[{"id": "99e27141c90d4c3dba0cfc7a7013bd11", "name": "Estonia 2025 Local Councils (Jaoskond)", "metadata": {"country": "Estonia", "year": 2025, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "VVK open data (CC BY 4.0): opendata.valimised.ee/api/KOV_2025/ DETAILED_RESULT_PARISH_*.xml (per-candidate J1..Jn cells = per-jaoskond PAPER votes), POLLING_STATION_LOCATIONS_et.csv (station names/addresses) and metadata.json (ehak<->name). Coordinates GEOCODED from the published addresses via the Maa-amet in-aadress gazetteer (614/614 exact matches), not published by the EMB. SCOPE: station rows carry PAPER votes cast in that station only - the KOV schema has no per-station e-vote cell, so parish-level e-votes (45.8% of all votes) and out-of-district paper votes are excluded from station rows. Per-station registered/cast/invalid are not published at any granularity finer than the electoral district, so registered=0 and valid is the station's party-vote sum. Reconciles exactly to the official station count and national valid-vote total, and to the independently built parish-level parquet in every parish. Replaces a broken build that held only J1 of each parish with parish-level registered/cast and no party columns.", "electoral_system": "open_list_pr", "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_eesti_keskerakond": "Eesti Keskerakond", "votes_eesti_rahvuslased_ja_konservatiivid": "Eesti Rahvuslased ja Konservatiivid", "votes_eesti_reformierakond": "Eesti Reformierakond", "votes_ekre_eesti_konservatiivne_rahvaerakond": "EKRE - Eesti Konservatiivne Rahvaerakond", "votes_erakond_eesti_200": "Erakond Eesti 200", "votes_erakond_eestimaa_rohelised": "Erakond Eestimaa Rohelised", "votes_erakond_parempoolsed": "Erakond Parempoolsed", "votes_isamaa_erakond": "ISAMAA Erakond", "votes_kodukoha_valimisliit": "Kodukoha Valimisliit", "votes_kogukondade_valimisliit": "KOGUKONDADE VALIMISLIIT", "votes_koos_organisatsioon_osutab_suveraansusele": "KOOS organisatsioon osutab suver\u00e4\u00e4nsusele", "votes_laaneranna_rahva_valimisliit": "L\u00e4\u00e4neranna Rahva Valimisliit", "votes_meie_valga_valimisliit": "MEIE VALGA valimisliit", "votes_plaan_b_narva_linna_pulss_valimisliit": "Plaan B Narva Linna Pulss valimisliit", "votes_plaan_b_valimisliit_0171": "Plaan B valimisliit (Elva vald)", "votes_plaan_b_valimisliit_0191": "Plaan B valimisliit (Haljala vald)", "votes_plaan_b_valimisliit_0528": "Plaan B valimisliit (N\u00f5o vald)", "votes_plaan_b_valimisliit_0618": "Plaan B valimisliit (P\u00f5ltsamaa vald)", "votes_plaan_b_valimisliit_0624": "Plaan B valimisliit (P\u00e4rnu linn)", "votes_plaan_b_valimisliit_0661": "Plaan B valimisliit (Rakvere vald)", "votes_plaan_b_valimisliit_0663": "Plaan B valimisliit (Rakvere linn)", "votes_plaan_b_valimisliit_0784": "Plaan B valimisliit (Haabersti linnaosa)", "votes_plaan_b_valimisliit_0793": "Plaan B valimisliit (Tartu linn)", "votes_raabisetee_valimisliit": "R\u00e4\u00e4bisetee Valimisliit", "votes_riidaja_podrala_valimisliit": "Riidaja-P\u00f5drala Valimisliit", "votes_saue_valimisliit_koostoo_meie_vald": "Saue valimisliit \"Koost\u00f6\u00f6 - Meie vald\"", "votes_siin_me_elame_valimisliit": "Siin me elame valimisliit", "votes_sotsiaaldemokraatlik_erakond": "Sotsiaaldemokraatlik Erakond", "votes_tallinlaste_valimisliit": "Tallinlaste Valimisliit", "votes_terve_vald_valimisliit": "Terve Vald Valimisliit", "votes_uksikkandidaadid": "\u00dcksikkandidaadid", "votes_vabaerakond_aru_pahe": "Vabaerakond Aru P\u00e4he", "votes_valimisliit_alutaguse": "Valimisliit Alutaguse", "votes_valimisliit_anija_uhendus": "Valimisliit Anija \u00dchendus", "votes_valimisliit_arenev_raasiku_vald": "Valimisliit Arenev Raasiku vald", "votes_valimisliit_elav_kihnu": "Valimisliit El\u00e4v Kihnu", "votes_valimisliit_elujouline_vormsi": "Valimisliit Eluj\u00f5uline Vormsi", "votes_valimisliit_ettevotlik_kambja": "Valimisliit Ettev\u00f5tlik Kambja", "votes_valimisliit_hari": "Valimisliit HARI", "votes_valimisliit_haridusreformi_tuhistamise_ja_venekeelse_hariduse_taastamise_eest": "Valimisliit haridusreformi t\u00fchistamise ja venekeelse hariduse taastamise eest", "votes_valimisliit_harku_liit": "Valimisliit Harku Liit", "votes_valimisliit_inimeste_eest": "Valimisliit \"Inimeste eest\"", "votes_valimisliit_ise_kutsusite": "Valimisliit Ise Kutsusite", "votes_valimisliit_jarva_valla_heaks": "Valimisliit J\u00e4rva valla heaks", "votes_valimisliit_katri_nimekiri": "Valimisliit Katri nimekiri", "votes_valimisliit_kiili_kulade_uhendus": "Valimisliit Kiili K\u00fclade \u00dchendus", "votes_valimisliit_kindel_tulevik": "Valimisliit Kindel Tulevik", "votes_valimisliit_kindel_valik": "Valimisliit Kindel Valik", "votes_valimisliit_kodu": "Valimisliit Kodu", "votes_valimisliit_kodukoht": "Valimisliit Kodukoht", "votes_valimisliit_kodukoht_kose": "Valimisliit Kodukoht Kose", "votes_valimisliit_kodune_peipsiaare": "Valimisliit Kodune Peipsi\u00e4\u00e4re", "votes_valimisliit_koduvald_0214": "Valimisliit Koduvald (H\u00e4\u00e4demeeste vald)", "votes_valimisliit_koduvald_0806": "Valimisliit Koduvald (Tori vald)", "votes_valimisliit_koduvald_marjamaa": "Valimisliit Koduvald M\u00e4rjamaa", "votes_valimisliit_koduvald_turi": "Valimisliit Koduvald T\u00fcri", "votes_valimisliit_koduvalla_heaks": "Valimisliit Koduvalla heaks", "votes_valimisliit_kogukond_uhendab": "Valimisliit Kogukond \u00dchendab", "votes_valimisliit_kogukondade_viimsi": "Valimisliit Kogukondade Viimsi", "votes_valimisliit_kogukonna_eest": "Valimisliit Kogukonna Eest", "votes_valimisliit_kogukonna_heaks": "Valimisliit Kogukonna Heaks", "votes_valimisliit_kohalik_elu": "Valimisliit Kohalik Elu", "votes_valimisliit_kohalikud": "Valimisliit Kohalikud", "votes_valimisliit_koik_algab_kogukonnast": "Valimisliit K\u00f5ik Algab Kogukonnast", "votes_valimisliit_koostoo_0214": "Valimisliit Koost\u00f6\u00f6 (H\u00e4\u00e4demeeste vald)", "votes_valimisliit_koostoo_0792": "Valimisliit Koost\u00f6\u00f6 (Tapa vald)", "votes_valimisliit_luunja_hooandjad": "Valimisliit Luunja Hooandjad", "votes_valimisliit_luunja_restart": "VALIMISLIIT LUUNJA RESTART", "votes_valimisliit_m_e_l_l": "Valimisliit M.E.L.L.", "votes_valimisliit_maardu_haal_golos_maardu": "Valimisliit Maardu H\u00e4\u00e4l - Golos Maardu", "votes_valimisliit_maheda": "Valimisliit Maheda", "votes_valimisliit_marjamaa_kogukonna_eest": "Valimisliit M\u00e4rjamaa Kogukonna Eest", "votes_valimisliit_me_armastame_harku_valda": "Valimisliit Me Armastame Harku Valda", "votes_valimisliit_meie_kodu_0291": "Valimisliit Meie Kodu (Kastre vald)", "votes_valimisliit_meie_kodu_0732": "Valimisliit Meie Kodu (Setomaa vald)", "votes_valimisliit_meie_kodu_vinni_vald": "Valimisliit Meie Kodu Vinni Vald", "votes_valimisliit_meie_kogukonnad": "Valimisliit Meie Kogukonnad", "votes_valimisliit_meie_kuusalu": "Valimisliit Meie Kuusalu", "votes_valimisliit_meie_luunja": "Valimisliit Meie Luunja", "votes_valimisliit_meie_maardu": "Valimisliit \u201eMEIE MAARDU\u201c", "votes_valimisliit_meie_mulgimaa": "Valimisliit Meie Mulgimaa", "votes_valimisliit_meie_pandivere": "Valimisliit MEIE PANDIVERE", "votes_valimisliit_meie_peipsiaare": "Valimisliit Meie Peipsi\u00e4\u00e4re", "votes_valimisliit_meie_pohja_sakala": "Valimisliit Meie P\u00f5hja-Sakala", "votes_valimisliit_meie_vald": "Valimisliit \"Meie Vald\"", "votes_valimisliit_meie_vald_2035": "Valimisliit \"Meie Vald 2035\"", "votes_valimisliit_meie_valga_eest_ja_heaks": "Valimisliit Meie Valga eest ja heaks", "votes_valimisliit_meie_valla_eest": "Valimisliit Meie Valla Eest!", "votes_valimisliit_mihhail_stalnuhhini_rahvanimekiri": "Valimisliit Mihhail Stalnuhhini rahvanimekiri", "votes_valimisliit_minu_kohila": "Valimisliit Minu Kohila", "votes_valimisliit_mote_moistlikult_ja_tegusalt": "Valimisliit M\u00d5TE - m\u00f5istlikult ja tegusalt", "votes_valimisliit_muhu": "Valimisliit Muhu", "votes_valimisliit_oma_inimesed": "Valimisliit Oma Inimesed", "votes_valimisliit_oma_vald": "Valimisliit Oma Vald", "votes_valimisliit_omad_inimesed": "Valimisliit Omad Inimesed", "votes_valimisliit_omakandi": "Valimisliit Omakandi", "votes_valimisliit_parem_kiili_restart": "Valimisliit Parem Kiili - Restart", "votes_valimisliit_parem_kohila": "Valimisliit PAREM KOHILA", "votes_valimisliit_parnu_uhendab": "Valimisliit P\u00e4rnu \u00dchendab", "votes_valimisliit_plaan_a": "Valimisliit PLAAN A", "votes_valimisliit_raasiku_vald": "Valimisliit Raasiku Vald", "votes_valimisliit_rahu": "Valimisliit RAHU", "votes_valimisliit_ranna_viru": "Valimisliit Ranna-Viru", "votes_valimisliit_rannamand": "Valimisliit Rannam\u00e4nd", "votes_valimisliit_rapla_vallakodanike_liit": "Valimisliit Rapla Vallakodanike Liit", "votes_valimisliit_restart": "Valimisliit Restart", "votes_valimisliit_restart_kohtla_jarve": "Valimisliit Restart Kohtla-J\u00e4rve", "votes_valimisliit_ruhnu_heaks": "Valimisliit Ruhnu Heaks", "votes_valimisliit_saarlased": "Valimisliit Saarlased", "votes_valimisliit_sakutajad": "Valimisliit Sakutajad", "votes_valimisliit_sidus_rapla": "Valimisliit Sidus Rapla", "votes_valimisliit_sillad": "Valimisliit Sillad", "votes_valimisliit_sillamae_heaks": "Valimisliit Sillam\u00e4e heaks", "votes_valimisliit_sinu_elva_vald": "Valimisliit Sinu Elva vald", "votes_valimisliit_sinu_noo": "Valimisliit Sinu N\u00f5o", "votes_valimisliit_sinu_ruhnu": "Valimisliit SINU RUHNU", "votes_valimisliit_sudamega_parnu": "Valimisliit S\u00fcdamega P\u00e4rnu", "votes_valimisliit_sudamega_saardes": "Valimisliit S\u00fcdamega Saardes", "votes_valimisliit_sudamega_viljandis": "Valimisliit S\u00fcdamega Viljandis", "votes_valimisliit_sudames_paide": "Valimisliit S\u00fcdames Paide", "votes_valimisliit_tasakaal_0338": "VALIMISLIIT TASAKAAL (Kose vald)", "votes_valimisliit_tasakaal_0637": "VALIMISLIIT TASAKAAL (P\u00f5hja-P\u00e4rnumaa vald)", "votes_valimisliit_tasakaal_0903": "VALIMISLIIT TASAKAAL (Viru-Nigula vald)", "votes_valimisliit_tasakaalus_vald": "Valimisliit Tasakaalus Vald", "votes_valimisliit_tegu_seob": "Valimisliit Tegu Seob", "votes_valimisliit_tegus_koduvald": "Valimisliit Tegus Koduvald", "votes_valimisliit_tegus_peipsiaare": "Valimisliit Tegus Peipsi\u00e4\u00e4re", "votes_valimisliit_tegusad": "Valimisliit Tegusad", "votes_valimisliit_terve_haapsalu": "Valimisliit Terve Haapsalu", "votes_valimisliit_terve_keila": "VALIMISLIIT TERVE KEILA", "votes_valimisliit_terve_koduvald_0272": "Valimisliit Terve Koduvald (Kadrina vald)", "votes_valimisliit_terve_koduvald_0806": "Valimisliit Terve Koduvald (Tori vald)", "votes_valimisliit_terve_kuusalu_vald": "Valimisliit Terve Kuusalu Vald", "votes_valimisliit_terve_saaremaa": "Valimisliit Terve Saaremaa", "votes_valimisliit_terve_torva": "Valimisliit Terve T\u00f5rva", "votes_valimisliit_tugev_vald": "Valimisliit Tugev Vald", "votes_valimisliit_tuleviku_keila": "VALIMISLIIT TULEVIKU KEILA", "votes_valimisliit_tuleviku_marjamaa": "VALIMISLIIT TULEVIKU M\u00c4RJAMAA", "votes_valimisliit_turi_valla_heaks": "Valimisliit T\u00fcri valla heaks", "votes_valimisliit_uheskoos": "Valimisliit \u00dcheskoos", "votes_valimisliit_uhine_hiiumaa": "Valimisliit \u00dchine Hiiumaa", "votes_valimisliit_uhine_kodu_0353": "valimisliit \u00dchine Kodu (Kuusalu vald)", "votes_valimisliit_uhine_kodu_0515": "valimisliit \u00dchine Kodu (Narva-J\u00f5esuu linn)", "votes_valimisliit_uhine_poltsamaa_vald": "Valimisliit \u00dchine P\u00f5ltsamaa Vald", "votes_valimisliit_uhine_ruhnu": "Valimisliit \u00dchine Ruhnu", "votes_valimisliit_uhine_setomaa": "Valimisliit \u00dchine Setomaa", "votes_valimisliit_uhine_siht": "Valimisliit \"\u00dchine Siht\"", "votes_valimisliit_uhise_valla_eest": "VALIMISLIIT \u00dcHISE VALLA EEST", "votes_valimisliit_uhiselt_johvi_eest": "Valimisliit \u00dcHISELT J\u00d5HVI EEST", "votes_valimisliit_uhiselt_tegus": "Valimisliit \u00dchiselt Tegus", "votes_valimisliit_uhtne_kihnu": "Valimisliit \u00dchtne Kihnu", "votes_valimisliit_uhtne_tartu_vald": "Valimisliit \u00dchtne Tartu Vald", "votes_valimisliit_uhtne_vald_0250": "Valimisliit \u00dchtne Vald (J\u00f5hvi vald)", "votes_valimisliit_uhtne_vald_0708": "Valimisliit \u00dchtne Vald (R\u00e4pina vald)", "votes_valimisliit_uhtne_viljandi_vald": "Valimisliit \u00dchtne Viljandi vald", "votes_valimisliit_uks_uhtne_vald": "Valimisliit \u00dcks \u00fchtne vald", "votes_valimisliit_uued_tuuled": "Valimisliit Uued Tuuled", "votes_valimisliit_uuenev_anija_vald": "Valimisliit Uuenev Anija Vald", "votes_valimisliit_uus_algus": "Valimisliit UUS ALGUS", "votes_valimisliit_uus_plaan": "Valimisliit Uus Plaan", "votes_valimisliit_uus_suund": "Valimisliit UUS SUUND", "votes_valimisliit_vaartuslik_kodupaik": "VALIMISLIIT V\u00c4\u00c4RTUSLIK KODUPAIK", "votes_valimisliit_vaikelinn_saku": "Valimisliit V\u00c4IKELINN SAKU", "votes_valimisliit_valgejogi": "Valimisliit Valgej\u00f5gi", "votes_valimisliit_vali_viimsi": "Valimisliit Vali Viimsi", "votes_valimisliit_varsked_tuuled": "Valimisliit V\u00e4rsked Tuuled", "votes_valimisliit_virulased_0661": "Valimisliit Virulased (Rakvere vald)", "votes_valimisliit_virulased_0663": "Valimisliit Virulased (Rakvere linn)", "votes_valimisliit_virulased_0903": "Valimisliit Virulased (Viru-Nigula vald)", "votes_valimisliit_vlu_uhendus": "Valimisliit VL\u00dc \u00dchendus", "votes_valimisliit_voit": "Valimisliit V\u00d5IT"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 356, "granularity": "polling_station", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 356, "cast_gt_registered": 355}, "n_stations_flagged": 356, "created_at": "2026-08-31T09:26:48.188968", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 356, "n_distinct_geometry": 429, "quality_index": 3.848, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.264, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.887, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.837, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.264, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.799, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.833, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.296, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.887, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.969, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.025, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.025, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.969, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 356}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d9177b4a0cfc462ab1cc3858a867638d", "name": "Estonia 2021 Local Councils (Jaoskond)", "metadata": {"country": "Estonia", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "VVK open data (CC BY 4.0): opendata.valimised.ee/api/KOV_2021/ DETAILED_RESULT_PARISH_*.xml (per-candidate J1..Jn cells = per-jaoskond PAPER votes), POLLING_STATION_LOCATIONS_et.csv (station names/addresses) and metadata.json (ehak<->name). Coordinates GEOCODED from the published addresses via the Maa-amet in-aadress gazetteer (614/614 exact matches), not published by the EMB. SCOPE: station rows carry PAPER votes cast in that station only - the KOV schema has no per-station e-vote cell, so parish-level e-votes (46.8% of all votes) and out-of-district paper votes are excluded from station rows. Per-station registered/cast/invalid are not published at any granularity finer than the electoral district, so registered=0 and valid is the station's party-vote sum. Reconciles exactly to the official station count and national valid-vote total, and to the independently built parish-level parquet in every parish. Replaces a broken build that held only J1 of each parish with parish-level registered/cast and no party columns.", "electoral_system": "open_list_pr", "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_eesti_keskerakond": "Eesti Keskerakond", "votes_eesti_konservatiivne_rahvaerakond": "Eesti Konservatiivne Rahvaerakond", "votes_eesti_reformierakond": "Eesti Reformierakond", "votes_eesti_tulevikuerakond": "Eesti Tulevikuerakond", "votes_erakond_eesti_200": "Erakond Eesti 200", "votes_erakond_eestimaa_rohelised": "Erakond Eestimaa Rohelised", "votes_isamaa_erakond": "ISAMAA Erakond", "votes_kodukoha_valimisliit": "Kodukoha Valimisliit", "votes_korgemaa_valimisliit": "K\u00f5rgemaa valimisliit", "votes_laaneranna_valimisliit": "L\u00e4\u00e4neranna valimisliit", "votes_saue_valimisliit_koostoo_meie_vald": "Saue valimisliit \"Koost\u00f6\u00f6 - Meie vald\"", "votes_siin_me_elame_valimisliit": "Siin me elame valimisliit", "votes_sotsiaaldemokraatlik_erakond": "Sotsiaaldemokraatlik Erakond", "votes_terve_meie_kogukond_valimisliit": "Terve meie kogukond valimisliit", "votes_uksikkandidaadid": "\u00dcksikkandidaadid", "votes_vaba_eesti_valimisliit": "Vaba Eesti valimisliit", "votes_valga_2_1_valimisliit": "Valga 2.1 valimisliit", "votes_valimisliit_4k": "Valimisliit 4K", "votes_valimisliit_alutaguse": "Valimisliit Alutaguse", "votes_valimisliit_anija_uhendus": "Valimisliit Anija \u00dchendus", "votes_valimisliit_antsla_urvaste": "Valimisliit ANTSLA -URVASTE", "votes_valimisliit_arenev_loksa": "Valimisliit \"Arenev Loksa\"", "votes_valimisliit_avatud_vormsi": "Valimisliit Avatud Vormsi", "votes_valimisliit_elagu_narva": "Valimisliit Elagu Narva", "votes_valimisliit_ettevotlik_kambja": "Valimisliit Ettev\u00f5tlik Kambja", "votes_valimisliit_ettevotlik_kuusalu": "Valimisliit Ettev\u00f5tlik Kuusalu", "votes_valimisliit_hari": "Valimisliit HARI", "votes_valimisliit_harku_liit": "Valimisliit Harku Liit", "votes_valimisliit_hea_valik": "Valimisliit HEA VALIK", "votes_valimisliit_hoiame_head": "Valimisliit Hoiame Head", "votes_valimisliit_inimeste_eest": "Valimisliit \"Inimeste eest\"", "votes_valimisliit_jarva_valla_heaks": "Valimisliit J\u00e4rva valla heaks", "votes_valimisliit_johvikad": "Valimisliit J\u00d5HVIKAD", "votes_valimisliit_katri_raigi_nimekiri": "Valimisliit \"Katri Raigi nimekiri\"", "votes_valimisliit_kiili_arenema_restart": "Valimisliit Kiili Arenema - RESTART", "votes_valimisliit_kiili_kulade_uhendus": "Valimisliit Kiili K\u00fclade \u00dchendus", "votes_valimisliit_kimmas_punt": "Valimisliit Kimm\u00e4s Punt", "votes_valimisliit_kodu": "Valimisliit Kodu", "votes_valimisliit_kodukant_puurmani": "Valimisliit Kodukant Puurmani", "votes_valimisliit_koduvald_0142": "Valimisliit KODUVALD (Antsla vald)", "votes_valimisliit_koduvald_0272": "Valimisliit KODUVALD (Kadrina vald)", "votes_valimisliit_koduvald_0809": "Valimisliit KODUVALD (Tori vald)", "votes_valimisliit_koduvald_turi": "Valimisliit Koduvald T\u00fcri", "votes_valimisliit_kogukond_uhendab": "Valimisliit Kogukond \u00dchendab", "votes_valimisliit_kogukondade_viimsi": "Valimisliit Kogukondade Viimsi", "votes_valimisliit_kogukonna_haal": "Valimisliit Kogukonna H\u00e4\u00e4l", "votes_valimisliit_kohalik_elu": "Valimisliit Kohalik Elu", "votes_valimisliit_koik_on_olulised": "Valimisliit K\u00d5IK ON OLULISED", "votes_valimisliit_koostoo_0214": "Valimisliit Koost\u00f6\u00f6 (H\u00e4\u00e4demeeste vald)", "votes_valimisliit_koostoo_0792": "Valimisliit Koost\u00f6\u00f6 (Tapa vald)", "votes_valimisliit_korruptsioonivaba_tartu_vald": "Valimisliit Korruptsioonivaba Tartu Vald", "votes_valimisliit_loome_koos": "Valimisliit Loome Koos", "votes_valimisliit_luunja_hooandjad": "Valimisliit Luunja Hooandjad", "votes_valimisliit_luunja_nahtamatu_kogukonna_eest": "Valimisliit Luunja n\u00e4htamatu kogukonna eest", "votes_valimisliit_maardu_haal_golos_maardu": "Valimisliit Maardu H\u00e4\u00e4l \u2013 Golos Maardu", "votes_valimisliit_maheda": "Valimisliit Maheda", "votes_valimisliit_meie_inimesed": "VALIMISLIIT MEIE INIMESED", "votes_valimisliit_meie_kodu_0291": "Valimisliit Meie Kodu (Kastre vald)", "votes_valimisliit_meie_kodu_0903": "Valimisliit Meie Kodu (Viru-Nigula vald)", "votes_valimisliit_meie_kodu_vinni_vald": "Valimisliit Meie Kodu Vinni Vald", "votes_valimisliit_meie_koduvald_luganuse": "Valimisliit Meie Koduvald L\u00fcganuse", "votes_valimisliit_meie_maardu": "Valimisliit \u201eMEIE MAARDU\u201c", "votes_valimisliit_meie_mulgimaa": "Valimisliit Meie Mulgimaa", "votes_valimisliit_meie_pandivere": "Valimisliit MEIE PANDIVERE", "votes_valimisliit_meie_ruhnu": "Valimisliit Meie Ruhnu", "votes_valimisliit_meie_vald_0442": "Valimisliit MEIE VALD (L\u00fcganuse vald)", "votes_valimisliit_meie_vald_0638": "Valimisliit MEIE VALD (P\u00f5hja-P\u00e4rnumaa vald)", "votes_valimisliit_meie_vald_2035": "Valimisliit Meie Vald 2035", "votes_valimisliit_meie_vald_kose": "Valimisliit Meie Vald Kose", "votes_valimisliit_muutuv_saarde": "Valimisliit Muutuv Saarde", "votes_valimisliit_narodnyi_sojuz_0511": "Valimisliit Narodnyi Sojuz (Narva linn)", "votes_valimisliit_narodnyi_sojuz_0784": "Valimisliit Narodnyi Sojuz (Haabersti linnaosa)", "votes_valimisliit_oma_rahva_eest": "Valimisliit OMA RAHVA EEST", "votes_valimisliit_oma_vald": "Valimisliit OMA VALD", "votes_valimisliit_omad_inimesed": "Valimisliit Omad Inimesed", "votes_valimisliit_paide_inimeste_linn": "Valimisliit Paide - Inimeste linn", "votes_valimisliit_parem_kihnu": "Valimisliit Parem Kihnu", "votes_valimisliit_parem_kohila": "Valimisliit PAREM KOHILA", "votes_valimisliit_parem_saarde": "Valimisliit Parem Saarde", "votes_valimisliit_parim_koduvald": "Valimisliit Parim Koduvald", "votes_valimisliit_parnu_uhendab": "Valimisliit P\u00e4rnu \u00dchendab", "votes_valimisliit_peipsiaare_uhinenud_kogukonnad": "Valimisliit Peipsi\u00e4\u00e4re \u00dchinenud Kogukonnad", "votes_valimisliit_plaan_a": "VALIMISLIIT PLAAN A", "votes_valimisliit_polva_areng": "Valimisliit P\u00f5lva Areng", "votes_valimisliit_progress": "Valimisliit PROGRESS", "votes_valimisliit_raasiku_vald": "VALIMISLIIT RAASIKU VALD", "votes_valimisliit_rakvere_heaks": "VALIMISLIIT RAKVERE HEAKS", "votes_valimisliit_rannamand": "Valimisliit Rannam\u00e4nd", "votes_valimisliit_rapla_vallakodanike_liit": "Valimisliit Rapla Vallakodanike Liit", "votes_valimisliit_restart_kohtla_jarve": "Valimisliit Restart Kohtla-J\u00e4rve", "votes_valimisliit_roheline_saku_vald": "Valimisliit Roheline Saku Vald", "votes_valimisliit_rouge_200": "Valimisliit R\u00f5uge 200", "votes_valimisliit_ruhnlased": "Valimisliit Ruhnlased", "votes_valimisliit_sidus_rapla": "Valimisliit Sidus Rapla", "votes_valimisliit_sinu_elva_vald": "Valimisliit Sinu Elva vald", "votes_valimisliit_sinu_otepaa": "Valimisliit Sinu Otep\u00e4\u00e4", "votes_valimisliit_sobralik_keila": "VALIMISLIIT S\u00d5BRALIK KEILA", "votes_valimisliit_sudamega_saardes": "Valimisliit S\u00fcdamega Saardes", "votes_valimisliit_sudamega_viljandis": "Valimisliit S\u00fcdamega Viljandis", "votes_valimisliit_tasakaal_0638": "Valimisliit Tasakaal (P\u00f5hja-P\u00e4rnumaa vald)", "votes_valimisliit_tasakaal_0903": "Valimisliit Tasakaal (Viru-Nigula vald)", "votes_valimisliit_tasakaalus_arenev_vormsi": "VALIMISLIIT TASAKAALUS ARENEV VORMSI", "votes_valimisliit_tegu_seob": "Valimisliit Tegu Seob", "votes_valimisliit_tegusad_kogukonnad": "Valimisliit Tegusad Kogukonnad", "votes_valimisliit_tegusalt_tulevikku": "Valimisliit Tegusalt Tulevikku", "votes_valimisliit_terve_koduvald": "Valimisliit Terve Koduvald", "votes_valimisliit_terve_saaremaa": "Valimisliit Terve Saaremaa", "votes_valimisliit_terve_vald": "Valimisliit Terve Vald", "votes_valimisliit_tugevad_kogukonnad": "Valimisliit Tugevad Kogukonnad", "votes_valimisliit_tuleviku_marjamaa": "VALIMISLIIT TULEVIKU M\u00c4RJAMAA", "votes_valimisliit_tulevikuvald_turi": "Valimisliit Tulevikuvald T\u00fcri", "votes_valimisliit_uhendus": "Valimisliit \u00dchendus", "votes_valimisliit_uheskoos": "Valimisliit \u00dcHESKOOS", "votes_valimisliit_uhine_hiiumaa": "Valimisliit \u00dchine Hiiumaa", "votes_valimisliit_uhine_kodu_0353": "Valimisliit \u00dchine Kodu (Kuusalu vald)", "votes_valimisliit_uhine_kodu_0514": "Valimisliit \u00dchine Kodu (Narva-J\u00f5esuu linn)", "votes_valimisliit_uhine_poltsamaa": "Valimisliit \u00dcHINE P\u00d5LTSAMAA", "votes_valimisliit_uhine_ruhnu": "Valimisliit \u00dchine Ruhnu", "votes_valimisliit_uhine_setomaa": "Valimisliit \u00dchine Setomaa", "votes_valimisliit_uhine_tee": "Valimisliit \u00dchine Tee", "votes_valimisliit_uhinenud_kogukonnad": "Valimisliit \"\u00dchinenud Kogukonnad\"", "votes_valimisliit_uhise_valla_eest": "VALIMISLIIT \u00dcHISE VALLA EEST", "votes_valimisliit_uhiselt_johvi_eest": "Valimisliit \u00dcHISELT J\u00d5HVI EEST", "votes_valimisliit_uhtne_ja_edumeelne_koduvald": "Valimisliit \u00dchtne ja Edumeelne Koduvald", "votes_valimisliit_uhtne_johvi": "Valimisliit \u00dchtne J\u00f5hvi", "votes_valimisliit_uhtne_kihnu": "Valimisliit \u00dchtne Kihnu", "votes_valimisliit_uhtne_koduvald": "Valimisliit \u00dchtne Koduvald", "votes_valimisliit_uhtne_kogukond": "Valimisliit \u00dchtne Kogukond", "votes_valimisliit_uhtne_noo_vald": "Valimisliit \"\u00dchtne N\u00f5o vald\"", "votes_valimisliit_uhtne_tartu_vald": "Valimisliit \u00dchtne Tartu Vald", "votes_valimisliit_uhtne_vald_0708": "Valimisliit \u00dchtne vald (R\u00e4pina vald)", "votes_valimisliit_uhtne_vald_0803": "Valimisliit \u00dchtne vald (Toila vald)", "votes_valimisliit_uks_kuusalu_vald": "Valimisliit \u00dcks Kuusalu vald", "votes_valimisliit_uksmeelne_koduvald": "VALIMISLIIT \u00dcKSMEELNE KODUVALD", "votes_valimisliit_uus_aeg": "Valimisliit Uus Aeg", "votes_valimisliit_uus_luunja": "Valimisliit Uus Luunja", "votes_valimisliit_uus_paide": "Valimisliit \"UUS Paide\"", "votes_valimisliit_uus_vald": "Valimisliit Uus Vald", "votes_valimisliit_vaartuslik_kodupaik": "VALIMISLIIT V\u00c4\u00c4RTUSLIK KODUPAIK", "votes_valimisliit_vaba_vallakodanik": "Valimisliit Vaba Vallakodanik", "votes_valimisliit_vaikelinn_saku": "Valimisliit V\u00e4ikelinn Saku", "votes_valimisliit_valgejogi": "Valimisliit Valgej\u00f5gi", "votes_valimisliit_vali_viimsi": "Valimisliit Vali Viimsi", "votes_valimisliit_vandra_noored": "Valimisliit V\u00e4ndra noored", "votes_valimisliit_varsked_sillamae_tuuled": "Valimisliit V\u00e4rsked Sillam\u00e4e Tuuled"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 448, "granularity": "polling_station", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 447, "registered_not_positive": 448}, "n_stations_flagged": 448, "created_at": "2026-08-31T09:26:44.872787", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 448, "n_distinct_geometry": 483, "quality_index": 3.873, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.948, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.9, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.853, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.833, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.517, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.629, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.816, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.031, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.031, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 448}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "86d2235fac234b7fa0c869c364f1d5c0", "name": "India 2011 local (overnight india_west_bengal_2011_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2011, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/West_Bengal/West_Bengal_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ABGL": "ABGL", "ABHM": "ABHM", "AIFB": "AIFB", "AIMF": "AIMF", "AITC": "AITC", "AJSU": "AJSU", "AJSUP": "AJSUP", "AMB": "AMB", "BJP": "BJP", "BSP": "BSP", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI_ML_L": "CPI_ML_L", "CPM": "CPM", "DSP_P": "DSP_P", "GNLF": "GNLF", "GOJAM": "GOJAM", "IJP": "IJP", "INC": "INC", "INL": "INL", "IPFB": "IPFB", "IUC": "IUC", "IUML": "IUML", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_100_2": "Independent_100_2", "Independent_101_1": "Independent_101_1", "Independent_101_2": "Independent_101_2", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_104_1": "Independent_104_1", "Independent_104_2": "Independent_104_2", "Independent_105_1": "Independent_105_1", "Independent_105_2": "Independent_105_2", "Independent_106_1": "Independent_106_1", "Independent_106_2": "Independent_106_2", "Independent_108_1": "Independent_108_1", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "Independent_10_3": "Independent_10_3", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "Independent_112_1": "Independent_112_1", "Independent_113_1": "Independent_113_1", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_115_2": "Independent_115_2", "Independent_115_3": "Independent_115_3", "Independent_115_4": "Independent_115_4", "Independent_115_5": "Independent_115_5", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "Independent_117_1": "Independent_117_1", "Independent_117_2": "Independent_117_2", "Independent_117_3": "Independent_117_3", "Independent_117_4": "Independent_117_4", "Independent_119_1": "Independent_119_1", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_120_1": "Independent_120_1", "Independent_120_2": "Independent_120_2", "Independent_121_1": "Independent_121_1", "Independent_122_1": "Independent_122_1", "Independent_123_1": "Independent_123_1", "Independent_123_2": "Independent_123_2", "Independent_123_3": "Independent_123_3", "Independent_124_1": "Independent_124_1", "Independent_126_1": "Independent_126_1", "Independent_128_1": "Independent_128_1", "Independent_129_1": "Independent_129_1", "Independent_129_2": "Independent_129_2", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "Independent_12_3": "Independent_12_3", "Independent_130_1": "Independent_130_1", "Independent_130_2": "Independent_130_2", "Independent_131_1": "Independent_131_1", "Independent_133_1": "Independent_133_1", "Independent_134_1": "Independent_134_1", "Independent_134_2": "Independent_134_2", "Independent_136_1": "Independent_136_1", "Independent_137_1": "Independent_137_1", "Independent_137_2": "Independent_137_2", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_140_1": "Independent_140_1", "Independent_140_2": "Independent_140_2", "Independent_141_1": "Independent_141_1", "Independent_141_2": "Independent_141_2", "Independent_142_1": "Independent_142_1", "Independent_142_2": "Independent_142_2", "Independent_142_3": "Independent_142_3", "Independent_144_1": "Independent_144_1", "Independent_145_1": "Independent_145_1", "Independent_145_2": "Independent_145_2", "Independent_145_3": "Independent_145_3", "Independent_146_1": "Independent_146_1", "Independent_147_1": "Independent_147_1", "Independent_147_2": "Independent_147_2", "Independent_148_1": "Independent_148_1", "Independent_149_1": "Independent_149_1", "Independent_149_2": "Independent_149_2", "Independent_149_3": "Independent_149_3", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_150_1": "Independent_150_1", "Independent_150_2": "Independent_150_2", "Independent_150_3": "Independent_150_3", "Independent_150_4": "Independent_150_4", "Independent_150_5": "Independent_150_5", "Independent_150_6": "Independent_150_6", "Independent_151_1": "Independent_151_1", "Independent_151_2": "Independent_151_2", "Independent_151_3": "Independent_151_3", "Independent_151_4": "Independent_151_4", "Independent_152_1": "Independent_152_1", "Independent_152_2": "Independent_152_2", "Independent_153_1": "Independent_153_1", "Independent_153_2": "Independent_153_2", "Independent_153_3": "Independent_153_3", "Independent_153_4": "Independent_153_4", "Independent_154_1": "Independent_154_1", "Independent_155_1": "Independent_155_1", "Independent_155_2": "Independent_155_2", "Independent_156_1": "Independent_156_1", "Independent_156_2": "Independent_156_2", "Independent_157_1": "Independent_157_1", "Independent_158_1": "Independent_158_1", "Independent_158_2": "Independent_158_2", "Independent_158_3": "Independent_158_3", "Independent_158_4": "Independent_158_4", "Independent_159_1": "Independent_159_1", "Independent_159_2": "Independent_159_2", "Independent_159_3": "Independent_159_3", "Independent_159_4": "Independent_159_4", "Independent_159_5": "Independent_159_5", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_160_1": "Independent_160_1", "Independent_160_2": "Independent_160_2", "Independent_161_1": "Independent_161_1", "Independent_161_2": "Independent_161_2", "Independent_162_1": "Independent_162_1", "Independent_162_2": "Independent_162_2", "Independent_162_3": "Independent_162_3", "Independent_162_4": "Independent_162_4", "Independent_163_1": "Independent_163_1", "Independent_163_2": "Independent_163_2", "Independent_163_3": "Independent_163_3", "Independent_163_4": "Independent_163_4", "Independent_164_1": "Independent_164_1", "Independent_164_2": "Independent_164_2", "Independent_164_3": "Independent_164_3", "Independent_165_1": "Independent_165_1", "Independent_165_2": "Independent_165_2", "Independent_165_3": "Independent_165_3", "Independent_165_4": "Independent_165_4", "Independent_165_5": "Independent_165_5", "Independent_165_6": "Independent_165_6", "Independent_165_7": "Independent_165_7", "Independent_166_1": "Independent_166_1", "Independent_166_2": "Independent_166_2", "Independent_166_3": "Independent_166_3", "Independent_166_4": "Independent_166_4", "Independent_166_5": "Independent_166_5", "Independent_166_6": "Independent_166_6", "Independent_167_1": "Independent_167_1", "Independent_167_2": "Independent_167_2", "Independent_167_3": "Independent_167_3", "Independent_168_1": "Independent_168_1", "Independent_168_2": "Independent_168_2", "Independent_169_1": "Independent_169_1", "Independent_169_2": "Independent_169_2", "Independent_169_3": "Independent_169_3", "Independent_169_4": "Independent_169_4", "Independent_169_5": "Independent_169_5", "Independent_169_6": "Independent_169_6", "Independent_169_7": "Independent_169_7", "Independent_169_8": "Independent_169_8", "Independent_169_9": "Independent_169_9", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_16_2": "Independent_16_2", "Independent_170_1": "Independent_170_1", "Independent_170_2": "Independent_170_2", "Independent_170_3": "Independent_170_3", "Independent_170_4": "Independent_170_4", "Independent_171_1": "Independent_171_1", "Independent_171_2": "Independent_171_2", "Independent_171_3": "Independent_171_3", "Independent_172_1": "Independent_172_1", "Independent_172_2": "Independent_172_2", "Independent_173_1": "Independent_173_1", "Independent_173_2": "Independent_173_2", "Independent_173_3": "Independent_173_3", "Independent_173_4": "Independent_173_4", "Independent_173_5": "Independent_173_5", "Independent_174_1": "Independent_174_1", "Independent_174_2": "Independent_174_2", "Independent_174_3": "Independent_174_3", "Independent_174_4": "Independent_174_4", "Independent_175_1": "Independent_175_1", "Independent_175_2": "Independent_175_2", "Independent_176_1": "Independent_176_1", "Independent_176_2": "Independent_176_2", "Independent_176_3": "Independent_176_3", "Independent_176_4": "Independent_176_4", "Independent_177_1": "Independent_177_1", "Independent_177_2": "Independent_177_2", "Independent_178_1": "Independent_178_1", "Independent_178_2": "Independent_178_2", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_180_1": "Independent_180_1", "Independent_180_2": "Independent_180_2", "Independent_180_3": "Independent_180_3", "Independent_181_1": "Independent_181_1", "Independent_181_2": "Independent_181_2", "Independent_181_3": "Independent_181_3", "Independent_182_1": "Independent_182_1", "Independent_182_2": "Independent_182_2", "Independent_183_1": "Independent_183_1", "Independent_183_2": "Independent_183_2", "Independent_183_3": "Independent_183_3", "Independent_184_1": "Independent_184_1", "Independent_184_2": "Independent_184_2", "Independent_184_3": "Independent_184_3", "Independent_184_4": "Independent_184_4", "Independent_187_1": "Independent_187_1", "Independent_187_2": "Independent_187_2", "Independent_189_1": "Independent_189_1", "Independent_190_1": "Independent_190_1", "Independent_191_1": "Independent_191_1", "Independent_195_1": "Independent_195_1", "Independent_195_2": "Independent_195_2", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "Independent_203_1": "Independent_203_1", "Independent_204_1": "Independent_204_1", "Independent_204_2": "Independent_204_2", "Independent_205_1": "Independent_205_1", "Independent_206_1": "Independent_206_1", "Independent_207_1": "Independent_207_1", "Independent_208_1": "Independent_208_1", "Independent_209_1": "Independent_209_1", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_211_1": "Independent_211_1", "Independent_212_1": "Independent_212_1", "Independent_212_2": "Independent_212_2", "Independent_212_3": "Independent_212_3", "Independent_213_1": "Independent_213_1", "Independent_215_1": "Independent_215_1", "Independent_216_1": "Independent_216_1", "Independent_216_2": "Independent_216_2", "Independent_217_1": "Independent_217_1", "Independent_218_1": "Independent_218_1", "Independent_219_1": "Independent_219_1", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_220_1": "Independent_220_1", "Independent_221_1": "Independent_221_1", "Independent_222_1": "Independent_222_1", "Independent_223_1": "Independent_223_1", "Independent_224_1": "Independent_224_1", "Independent_226_1": "Independent_226_1", "Independent_228_1": "Independent_228_1", "Independent_234_1": "Independent_234_1", "Independent_236_1": "Independent_236_1", "Independent_236_2": "Independent_236_2", "Independent_236_3": "Independent_236_3", "Independent_237_1": "Independent_237_1", "Independent_237_2": "Independent_237_2", "Independent_238_1": "Independent_238_1", "Independent_239_1": "Independent_239_1", "Independent_239_2": "Independent_239_2", "Independent_241_1": "Independent_241_1", "Independent_241_2": "Independent_241_2", "Independent_242_1": "Independent_242_1", "Independent_243_1": "Independent_243_1", "Independent_244_1": "Independent_244_1", "Independent_248_1": "Independent_248_1", "Independent_248_2": "Independent_248_2", "Independent_249_1": "Independent_249_1", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "Independent_250_1": "Independent_250_1", "Independent_250_2": "Independent_250_2", "Independent_250_3": "Independent_250_3", "Independent_252_1": "Independent_252_1", "Independent_252_2": "Independent_252_2", "Independent_252_3": "Independent_252_3", "Independent_253_1": "Independent_253_1", "Independent_253_2": "Independent_253_2", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_264_1": "Independent_264_1", "Independent_268_1": "Independent_268_1", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_270_1": "Independent_270_1", "Independent_270_2": "Independent_270_2", "Independent_271_1": "Independent_271_1", "Independent_273_1": "Independent_273_1", "Independent_275_1": "Independent_275_1", "Independent_275_2": "Independent_275_2", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "Independent_27_3": "Independent_27_3", "Independent_283_1": "Independent_283_1", "Independent_285_1": "Independent_285_1", "Independent_285_2": "Independent_285_2", "Independent_285_3": "Independent_285_3", "Independent_289_1": "Independent_289_1", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "Independent_291_1": "Independent_291_1", "Independent_292_1": "Independent_292_1", "Independent_292_2": "Independent_292_2", "Independent_293_1": "Independent_293_1", "Independent_293_2": "Independent_293_2", "Independent_293_3": "Independent_293_3", "Independent_294_1": "Independent_294_1", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_32_3": "Independent_32_3", "Independent_32_4": "Independent_32_4", "Independent_32_5": "Independent_32_5", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_34_3": "Independent_34_3", "Independent_34_4": "Independent_34_4", "Independent_34_5": "Independent_34_5", "Independent_34_6": "Independent_34_6", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "Independent_3_3": "Independent_3_3", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "Independent_41_3": "Independent_41_3", "Independent_41_4": "Independent_41_4", "Independent_41_5": "Independent_41_5", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_42_2": "Independent_42_2", "Independent_42_3": "Independent_42_3", "Independent_42_4": "Independent_42_4", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_45_2": "Independent_45_2", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_48_2": "Independent_48_2", "Independent_48_3": "Independent_48_3", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "Independent_4_4": "Independent_4_4", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "Independent_60_3": "Independent_60_3", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_62_3": "Independent_62_3", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "Independent_6_2": "Independent_6_2", "Independent_6_3": "Independent_6_3", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_75_2": "Independent_75_2", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_77_2": "Independent_77_2", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "Independent_7_2": "Independent_7_2", "Independent_7_3": "Independent_7_3", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_80_2": "Independent_80_2", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "Independent_81_2": "Independent_81_2", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_85_1": "Independent_85_1", "Independent_88_1": "Independent_88_1", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "Independent_94_1": "Independent_94_1", "Independent_97_1": "Independent_97_1", "Independent_97_2": "Independent_97_2", "Independent_99_1": "Independent_99_1", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "Independent_9_2": "Independent_9_2", "JDP": "JDP", "JD_S": "JD_S", "JD_U": "JD_U", "JGP": "JGP", "JHAP": "JHAP", "JKP_N": "JKP_N", "JMM": "JMM", "JP": "JP", "JVM": "JVM", "KPP": "KPP", "LJP": "LJP", "MUL": "MUL", "NCP": "NCP", "NSBP": "NSBP", "PBRML": "PBRML", "PDCI": "PDCI", "PDS": "PDS", "PPIS": "PPIS", "RADP": "RADP", "RCPI_R": "RCPI_R", "RJD": "RJD", "RJNP": "RJNP", "RPI": "RPI", "RPI_A": "RPI_A", "RSP": "RSP", "SAP": "SAP", "SDPI": "SDPI", "SJP_R": "SJP_R", "SP": "SP", "STPI": "STPI", "SUCI": "SUCI", "SWJP": "SWJP", "TRMRPPI": "TRMRPPI"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 294, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:06:48.907899", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.646, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.666, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.671, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.532, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.444, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.671, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.532, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.532, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.424, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.582, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 294}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "08b2edc89b9546aeaaf896d6d6c4638f", "name": "India 2013 parliamentary (overnight india_karnataka_2013_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/All_States/Karnataka_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"INC": "INC", "JD(S)": "JD(S)", "BJP": "BJP", "KJP": "KJP", "IND": "IND", "BSRCP": "BSRCP", "BSP": "BSP", "IND_2": "IND_2", "IND_3": "IND_3", "SKP": "SKP", "SP": "SP", "SDPI": "SDPI", "IND_4": "IND_4", "CPM": "CPM", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "LSP": "LSP", "IND_5": "IND_5", "KMP": "KMP", "IND_6": "IND_6", "CPI": "CPI", "IND_7": "IND_7", "KCVP": "KCVP", "NCP": "NCP", "IND_8": "IND_8", "RPI": "RPI", "BDBRAJP": "BDBRAJP", "SAJP": "SAJP", "ADMK": "ADMK", "WPOI": "WPOI", "NPP": "NPP", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "HND": "HND", "SJPA": "SJPA", "IND_9": "IND_9", "LJP": "LJP", "KRRS": "KRRS", "PPOI": "PPOI", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "ANC": "ANC", "SUCI": "SUCI", "HJP": "HJP", "IND_10": "IND_10", "RCMP": "RCMP", "IND_11": "IND_11", "SDP": "SDP", "IND_12": "IND_12", "BPJP": "BPJP", "IND_13": "IND_13", "NDEP": "NDEP", "AMJP": "AMJP", "IND_14": "IND_14", "IUML": "IUML", "RSPS": "RSPS", "BhJD": "BhJD", "SK": "SK", "IND_15": "IND_15", "DPPS": "DPPS", "ABML(S)": "ABML(S)", "BRPP": "BRPP", "CPM_2": "CPM_2", "KaSP": "KaSP", "BHPP": "BHPP", "IND_16": "IND_16", "MPHP": "MPHP", "IND_17": "IND_17", "KAP": "KAP", "IND_18": "IND_18", "ABHM": "ABHM", "AKBRP": "AKBRP", "IND_19": "IND_19", "KDC": "KDC", "VJCP": "VJCP", "SHS": "SHS", "PPIS": "PPIS", "INL": "INL", "SJKP": "SJKP", "AIFB(S)": "AIFB(S)", "JVBP": "JVBP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 224, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:06:46.508567", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.646, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.666, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.65, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.522, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.275, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.65, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.522, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.522, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.407, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.407, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.582, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 224}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "279db3cccbd442a5b964a128567d2782", "name": "India 2011 local (overnight india_kerala_2011_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2011, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Kerala/Kerala_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"MUL_P_B_ABDUL_RAZAK": "MUL_P_B_ABDUL_RAZAK", "BJP_K_SURENDRAN": "BJP_K_SURENDRAN", "CPM_ADV_C_H_KUNHAMBU": "CPM_ADV_C_H_KUNHAMBU", "IND_1_HAFSA_MUNEER": "IND_1_HAFSA_MUNEER", "BSP_ABDUL_MAJEED": "BSP_ABDUL_MAJEED", "IND_1_ABDULLA_TIMBER": "IND_1_ABDULLA_TIMBER", "IND_1_KUNHAMBU": "IND_1_KUNHAMBU", "IND_1_ABDUL_RAZAK_K": "IND_1_ABDUL_RAZAK_K", "IND_1_ABBAS_M": "IND_1_ABBAS_M", "IND_1_ABDULLA_P_M": "IND_1_ABDULLA_P_M", "MUL_N_A_NELLIKKUNNU": "MUL_N_A_NELLIKKUNNU", "BJP_JAYALAKSHMI_N_BHAT": "BJP_JAYALAKSHMI_N_BHAT", "INL_AZEEZ_KADAPPURAM": "INL_AZEEZ_KADAPPURAM", "SDPI_A_H_MUNEER": "SDPI_A_H_MUNEER", "IND_2_GOVINDA_RAJA_KUNTIKKANAMATA": "IND_2_GOVINDA_RAJA_KUNTIKKANAMATA", "BSP_SAIFUDEEN_K_MAKKODU": "BSP_SAIFUDEEN_K_MAKKODU", "IND_2_AJITH_KUMAR_AZAD": "IND_2_AJITH_KUMAR_AZAD", "IND_2_ABDULLA": "IND_2_ABDULLA", "CPM_K_KUNHIRAMAN_AC003": "CPM_K_KUNHIRAMAN_AC003", "CPM_K_KUNHIRAMAN_AC005": "CPM_K_KUNHIRAMAN_AC005", "INC_ADV_C_K_SREEDHARAN": "INC_ADV_C_K_SREEDHARAN", "BJP_SUNITHA_PRASANTH": "BJP_SUNITHA_PRASANTH", "SDPI_FAISAL_KOLIYADUKKAM": "SDPI_FAISAL_KOLIYADUKKAM", "BSP_P_DAMODARAN": "BSP_P_DAMODARAN", "IND_3_KRISHNANKUTTY": "IND_3_KRISHNANKUTTY", "IND_3_KUNHIRAMAN": "IND_3_KUNHIRAMAN", "CPI_E_CHANDRASHEKHARAN": "CPI_E_CHANDRASHEKHARAN", "INC_ADV_M_C_JOSE": "INC_ADV_M_C_JOSE", "BJP_MADIKAI_KAMMARAN": "BJP_MADIKAI_KAMMARAN", "IND_4_P_M_JOSEPH": "IND_4_P_M_JOSEPH", "BSP_GOPALAN_K": "BSP_GOPALAN_K", "INC_K_V_GANGADHARAN": "INC_K_V_GANGADHARAN", "BJP_T_RADHAKRISHNAN": "BJP_T_RADHAKRISHNAN", "SDPI_RAZAK_HAJI_PARAMBATH": "SDPI_RAZAK_HAJI_PARAMBATH", "BSP_ARUN_KUMAR": "BSP_ARUN_KUMAR", "IND_5_K_K_DILEEP_KUMAR": "IND_5_K_K_DILEEP_KUMAR", "CPM_C_KRISHNAN": "CPM_C_KRISHNAN", "INC_ADV_K_BRIJESH_KUMAR": "INC_ADV_K_BRIJESH_KUMAR", "BJP_C_K_RAMESAN_MASTER": "BJP_C_K_RAMESAN_MASTER", "BSP_GEETHA": "BSP_GEETHA", "IND_6_T_P_PADMANABHAN": "IND_6_T_P_PADMANABHAN", "SHS_KOTTAYODI_VISWANATHAN": "SHS_KOTTAYODI_VISWANATHAN", "CPM_T_V_RAJESH": "CPM_T_V_RAJESH", "INC_ADV_P_INDIRA": "INC_ADV_P_INDIRA", "BJP_ADV_SREEKANTH_RAVI_VARMA": "BJP_ADV_SREEKANTH_RAVI_VARMA", "SDPI_A_P_MAHAMOOD": "SDPI_A_P_MAHAMOOD", "BSP_K_GOPALAKRISHNAN": "BSP_K_GOPALAKRISHNAN", "CPM_JAMES_MATHEW": "CPM_JAMES_MATHEW", "KEC_M_ADV_JOB_MICHEL": "KEC_M_ADV_JOB_MICHEL", "BJP_K_JAYAPRAKASH": "BJP_K_JAYAPRAKASH", "SDPI_MUHAMMEDALI_S_P": "SDPI_MUHAMMEDALI_S_P", "BSP_NIDHEESH_THILLANKERI": "BSP_NIDHEESH_THILLANKERI", "IND_8_THOMAS_M_V": "IND_8_THOMAS_M_V", "INC_K_C_JOSEPH": "INC_K_C_JOSEPH", "CPI_ADV_P_SANTHOSH_KUMAR": "CPI_ADV_P_SANTHOSH_KUMAR", "BJP_M_G_RAMAKRISHNAN_NAIR": "BJP_M_G_RAMAKRISHNAN_NAIR", "IND_9_JOSEPH": "IND_9_JOSEPH", "IND_9_AMMINI_KRISHNAN": "IND_9_AMMINI_KRISHNAN", "BSP_BIJU_THOMAS": "BSP_BIJU_THOMAS", "MUL_K_M_SHAJI": "MUL_K_M_SHAJI", "CPM_M_PRAKASHAN_MASTER": "CPM_M_PRAKASHAN_MASTER", "BJP_M_K_SASEENDRAN_MASTER": "BJP_M_K_SASEENDRAN_MASTER", "IND_10_NOUSHAD_PUNNAKKAL": "IND_10_NOUSHAD_PUNNAKKAL", "IND_10_SHAJI_K_M": "IND_10_SHAJI_K_M", "BSP_C_BALAKRISHNAN": "BSP_C_BALAKRISHNAN", "SUCI_PAUL_T_SAMUEL": "SUCI_PAUL_T_SAMUEL", "IND_10_PRAKASHAN_KUZHIPARAMBIL": "IND_10_PRAKASHAN_KUZHIPARAMBIL", "INC_A_P_ABDULLAKUTTY": "INC_A_P_ABDULLAKUTTY", "IND_11_RAMACHANDRAN_KADANNAPPALLI": "IND_11_RAMACHANDRAN_KADANNAPPALLI", "BJP_U_T_JAYANDAN": "BJP_U_T_JAYANDAN", "SDPI_ADV_P_C_NOUSHAD": "SDPI_ADV_P_C_NOUSHAD", "IND_11_M_P_ABDULLAKUTTY": "IND_11_M_P_ABDULLAKUTTY", "IND_11_K_SUDHAKARAN": "IND_11_K_SUDHAKARAN", "BSP_S_NOORUDHEEN": "BSP_S_NOORUDHEEN", "CPM_K_K_NARAYANAN": "CPM_K_K_NARAYANAN", "IND_12_MAMBARAM_DIVAKARAN": "IND_12_MAMBARAM_DIVAKARAN", "BJP_C_P_SANGEETHA": "BJP_C_P_SANGEETHA", "IND_12_POYILORE_KUNNUMBROM_DIVAKARAN": "IND_12_POYILORE_KUNNUMBROM_DIVAKARAN", "BSP_MADHU_S_VAYANAN": "BSP_MADHU_S_VAYANAN", "CPM_KODIYERI_BALAKRISHNAN": "CPM_KODIYERI_BALAKRISHNAN", "INC_RIJIL_MAKKUTTY": "INC_RIJIL_MAKKUTTY", "BJP_ADV_V_RATHNAKARAN": "BJP_ADV_V_RATHNAKARAN", "SDPI_A_C_JALALUDDIN": "SDPI_A_C_JALALUDDIN", "BSP_K_RAGHUNATH": "BSP_K_RAGHUNATH", "IND_13_RIJIL_MULIYIL": "IND_13_RIJIL_MULIYIL", "IND_13_BALAKRISHNAN": "IND_13_BALAKRISHNAN", "SJD_K_P_MOHANAN_S_O_P_R_KURUP": "SJD_K_P_MOHANAN_S_O_P_R_KURUP", "IND_14_S_A_PUTHIYA_VALAPPIL": "IND_14_S_A_PUTHIYA_VALAPPIL", "BJP_O_K_VASU_MASTER": "BJP_O_K_VASU_MASTER", "IND_14_K_P_MOHANAN_S_O_KUNHIKANNAN": "IND_14_K_P_MOHANAN_S_O_KUNHIKANNAN", "IND_14_S_POOVALAPPIL": "IND_14_S_POOVALAPPIL", "IND_14_K_P_MOHANAN_S_O_NANU": "IND_14_K_P_MOHANAN_S_O_NANU", "IND_14_SULAIM_T_B": "IND_14_SULAIM_T_B", "CPM_E_P_JAYARAJAN": "CPM_E_P_JAYARAJAN", "SJD_JOSEPH_CHAAVARA": "SJD_JOSEPH_CHAAVARA", "BJP_BIJU_ELAKKUZHI": "BJP_BIJU_ELAKKUZHI", "SDPI_ADV_K_C_MUHAMMAD_SABEER": "SDPI_ADV_K_C_MUHAMMAD_SABEER", "IND_15_JOSEPH": "IND_15_JOSEPH", "BSP_HAMEED": "BSP_HAMEED", "INC_ADV_SUNNY_JOSEPH": "INC_ADV_SUNNY_JOSEPH", "CPM_K_K_SHAILAJA_TEACHER": "CPM_K_K_SHAILAJA_TEACHER", "BJP_P_K_VELAYUDHAN": "BJP_P_K_VELAYUDHAN", "SDPI_P_K_AYYAPPAN_MASTER": "SDPI_P_K_AYYAPPAN_MASTER", "IND_16_SUNNY_JOSEPH": "IND_16_SUNNY_JOSEPH", "IND_16_A_SHYLAJA": "IND_16_A_SHYLAJA", "BSP_RAGHAVAN": "BSP_RAGHAVAN", "IND_16_RADHAMANI_NARAYANA_KUMAR": "IND_16_RADHAMANI_NARAYANA_KUMAR", "INC_P_K_JAYALAKSHMI": "INC_P_K_JAYALAKSHMI", "CPM_K_C_KUNHIRAMAN": "CPM_K_C_KUNHIRAMAN", "BJP_IRUMUTTOOR_KUNHAMAN": "BJP_IRUMUTTOOR_KUNHAMAN", "SDPI_A_GOPAKUMAR": "SDPI_A_GOPAKUMAR", "IND_17_P_U_BABU": "IND_17_P_U_BABU", "BSP_ANNAN_MADAKKIMALA": "BSP_ANNAN_MADAKKIMALA", "INC_I_C_BALAKRISHNAN": "INC_I_C_BALAKRISHNAN", "CPM_E_A_SANKARAN": "CPM_E_A_SANKARAN", "BJP_PALLIYARA_RAMAN": "BJP_PALLIYARA_RAMAN", "BSP_MUKUNDAN_CHEENGERI": "BSP_MUKUNDAN_CHEENGERI", "SJD_M_V_SREYAMSKUMAR": "SJD_M_V_SREYAMSKUMAR", "CPM_P_A_MUHAMMED": "CPM_P_A_MUHAMMED", "BJP_ANAND_KUMAR_P_G": "BJP_ANAND_KUMAR_P_G", "SDPI_JAMEELA": "SDPI_JAMEELA", "IND_19_K_NASEERUDHEEN": "IND_19_K_NASEERUDHEEN", "IND_19_CLEATUS": "IND_19_CLEATUS", "BSP_MUJEEB_RAHMAN_ANJUKUNNU": "BSP_MUJEEB_RAHMAN_ANJUKUNNU", "JD_S_C_K_NANU": "JD_S_C_K_NANU", "SJD_ADV_M_K_PREMNATH": "SJD_ADV_M_K_PREMNATH", "IND_20_N_VENU": "IND_20_N_VENU", "BJP_M_P_RAJAN": "BJP_M_P_RAJAN", "SDPI_SAALIM_AZHIYUR": "SDPI_SAALIM_AZHIYUR", "IND_20_V_K_PREMANATHAN": "IND_20_V_K_PREMANATHAN", "CPM_K_K_LATHIKA": "CPM_K_K_LATHIKA", "MUL_SOOPI_NARIKKATTERI": "MUL_SOOPI_NARIKKATTERI", "BJP_V_K_SAJEEVAN": "BJP_V_K_SAJEEVAN", "SDPI_ABDUL_RAHEEM_MASTER": "SDPI_ABDUL_RAHEEM_MASTER", "BSP_M_SATHI": "BSP_M_SATHI", "IND_21_SOOPI_THODUVAYIL_VALAPPIL_MEETHAL": "IND_21_SOOPI_THODUVAYIL_VALAPPIL_MEETHAL", "IND_21_LATHIKA_VALIYAKULANGARA_KUNIYIL": "IND_21_LATHIKA_VALIYAKULANGARA_KUNIYIL", "IND_21_SOOPI_ALAKKATT": "IND_21_SOOPI_ALAKKATT", "IND_21_LATHIKA_NIDUMANALKUNI": "IND_21_LATHIKA_NIDUMANALKUNI", "SUCI_M_K_RAJAN": "SUCI_M_K_RAJAN", "CPI_E_K_VIJAYAN": "CPI_E_K_VIJAYAN", "INC_V_M_CHANDRAN": "INC_V_M_CHANDRAN", "BJP_ADV_PRAKASH_BABU": "BJP_ADV_PRAKASH_BABU", "SDPI_ISMAIL_KAMMANA": "SDPI_ISMAIL_KAMMANA", "IND_22_CHANDRAN": "IND_22_CHANDRAN", "IND_22_C_K_VIJAYAN": "IND_22_C_K_VIJAYAN", "IND_22_K_P_VIJAYAN": "IND_22_K_P_VIJAYAN", "CPM_K_DASAN": "CPM_K_DASAN", "INC_AD_K_P_ANIL_KUMAR": "INC_AD_K_P_ANIL_KUMAR", "BJP_T_P_JAYACHANDRAN_MASTER": "BJP_T_P_JAYACHANDRAN_MASTER", "IND_23_C_MUNEER": "IND_23_C_MUNEER", "SDPI_RASHID_P_T": "SDPI_RASHID_P_T", "IND_23_K_P_ANILKUMAR": "IND_23_K_P_ANILKUMAR", "BSP_K_V_KRISHNANKODUVAYAL": "BSP_K_V_KRISHNANKODUVAYAL", "IND_23_DASAN_M_K": "IND_23_DASAN_M_K", "IND_23_DASAN_V_K": "IND_23_DASAN_V_K", "CPM_K_KUNHAMMAD_MASTER": "CPM_K_KUNHAMMAD_MASTER", "KEC_M_ADV_MOHAMMED_IKBAL": "KEC_M_ADV_MOHAMMED_IKBAL", "BJP_P_CHANDRIKA_TEACHER": "BJP_P_CHANDRIKA_TEACHER", "SDPI_T_K_KUNHAMMAD_FAISY": "SDPI_T_K_KUNHAMMAD_FAISY", "IND_24_AKHILKUMAR": "IND_24_AKHILKUMAR", "BSP_K_K_VASU": "BSP_K_K_VASU", "CPM_PURUSHAN_KADALUNDI": "CPM_PURUSHAN_KADALUNDI", "INC_A_BALARAM": "INC_A_BALARAM", "BJP_ADV_T_K_RAMAN": "BJP_ADV_T_K_RAMAN", "SDPI_BHADRAN_M_P": "SDPI_BHADRAN_M_P", "BSP_K_K_SATHEESH": "BSP_K_K_SATHEESH", "NCP_A_K_SASEENDRAN": "NCP_A_K_SASEENDRAN", "SJD_SHAIK_P_HARRIZ": "SJD_SHAIK_P_HARRIZ", "BJP_V_V_RAJAN": "BJP_V_V_RAJAN", "IND_26_A_SASINDRAN": "IND_26_A_SASINDRAN", "BSP_RAMESH_NANMANDA": "BSP_RAMESH_NANMANDA", "CPM_A_PRADEEP_KUMAR": "CPM_A_PRADEEP_KUMAR", "INC_P_V_GANGADHARAN": "INC_P_V_GANGADHARAN", "BJP_P_REGHUNATH": "BJP_P_REGHUNATH", "IND_27_PRADEEP_KUMAR": "IND_27_PRADEEP_KUMAR", "IND_27_GANGADHARAN": "IND_27_GANGADHARAN", "BSP_LOOKA_JOSEPH": "BSP_LOOKA_JOSEPH", "SUCI_P_M_SREEKUMAR": "SUCI_P_M_SREEKUMAR", "MUL_DR_M_K_MUNEER": "MUL_DR_M_K_MUNEER", "CPM_C_P_MUSAFER_AHAMMED": "CPM_C_P_MUSAFER_AHAMMED", "BJP_JAYA_SADANANDAN": "BJP_JAYA_SADANANDAN", "SDPI_FAIZ_MOHAMMED": "SDPI_FAIZ_MOHAMMED", "IND_28_T_T_MUNEER": "IND_28_T_T_MUNEER", "IND_28_MUSSAFAR_AHAMMED": "IND_28_MUSSAFAR_AHAMMED", "BSP_MUHAMMED_ASHARAF_AC028": "BSP_MUHAMMED_ASHARAF_AC028", "BSP_MUHAMMED_ASHARAF_AC063": "BSP_MUHAMMED_ASHARAF_AC063", "CPM_ELAMARAM_KAREEM": "CPM_ELAMARAM_KAREEM", "INC_ADAM_MULSI_M_P": "INC_ADAM_MULSI_M_P", "BJP_K_P_SREESAN": "BJP_K_P_SREESAN", "SDPI_MUHAMMED_MUSTHAFA": "SDPI_MUHAMMED_MUSTHAFA", "IND_29_K_S_HARIHARAN": "IND_29_K_S_HARIHARAN", "BSP_K_T_LATHA": "BSP_K_T_LATHA", "IND_29_ADAM_MALIQUE_E": "IND_29_ADAM_MALIQUE_E", "IND_29_ABDUL_KAREEM": "IND_29_ABDUL_KAREEM", "IND_30_ADV_P_T_A_RAHIM": "IND_30_ADV_P_T_A_RAHIM", "IND_30_U_C_RAMAN": "IND_30_U_C_RAMAN", "BJP_C_K_PADMANABHAN": "BJP_C_K_PADMANABHAN", "SDPI_C_MUHAMMED_MASTER": "SDPI_C_MUHAMMED_MASTER", "IND_30_RAMAN_C_K": "IND_30_RAMAN_C_K", "IND_30_K_K_KUNHIKANARAN": "IND_30_K_K_KUNHIKANARAN", "IND_30_E_P_ABDUL_RAHEEM": "IND_30_E_P_ABDUL_RAHEEM", "IND_30_RAMAN_P_C": "IND_30_RAMAN_P_C", "IND_30_ABDU_RAHEEM_M_T": "IND_30_ABDU_RAHEEM_M_T", "SHS_M_P_BABURAJ": "SHS_M_P_BABURAJ", "BSP_O_P_SUNDARAN": "BSP_O_P_SUNDARAN", "MUL_V_M_UMMER_MASTER": "MUL_V_M_UMMER_MASTER", "CPM_M_MEHABOOB": "CPM_M_MEHABOOB", "BJP_GIREESH_THEVALLY": "BJP_GIREESH_THEVALLY", "SDPI_M_T_ABU_HAJI": "SDPI_M_T_ABU_HAJI", "BSP_ABOOBAKER": "BSP_ABOOBAKER", "IND_31_MEHABOOB_KANICHADIKKUZHI_VALEPARAMMEL": "IND_31_MEHABOOB_KANICHADIKKUZHI_VALEPARAMMEL", "IND_31_UMMER": "IND_31_UMMER", "IND_31_MEHABOOB_ILLIKKATHODI": "IND_31_MEHABOOB_ILLIKKATHODI", "MUL_C_MOYINKUTTY": "MUL_C_MOYINKUTTY", "CPM_GEORGE_M_THOMAS": "CPM_GEORGE_M_THOMAS", "BJP_JOSE_KAPPATTMALA": "BJP_JOSE_KAPPATTMALA", "SDPI_C_T_ASHRAF": "SDPI_C_T_ASHRAF", "IND_32_K_MOYINKUTTY": "IND_32_K_MOYINKUTTY", "IND_32_GEORGE_THOMAS": "IND_32_GEORGE_THOMAS", "IND_32_K_P_BASHEER_HAJI": "IND_32_K_P_BASHEER_HAJI", "BSP_GAFOOR_PUTHUPPADY": "BSP_GAFOOR_PUTHUPPADY", "MUL_K_MUHAMMEDUNNI_HAJI": "MUL_K_MUHAMMEDUNNI_HAJI", "CPM_P_C_NAUSHAD": "CPM_P_C_NAUSHAD", "BJP_DR_KUMARI_SUKUMARAN": "BJP_DR_KUMARI_SUKUMARAN", "SDPI_ABDU_RAHIMAN_P_T_BAPPU": "SDPI_ABDU_RAHIMAN_P_T_BAPPU", "IND_33_T_K_MAMMUNNI_HAJI": "IND_33_T_K_MAMMUNNI_HAJI", "BSP_E_P_MADHAVAN": "BSP_E_P_MADHAVAN", "IND_33_NOUSHAD_P": "IND_33_NOUSHAD_P", "MUL_P_K_BASHEER": "MUL_P_K_BASHEER", "IND_34_ANVER_P_V": "IND_34_ANVER_P_V", "BJP_K_P_BABURAJ_MASTER": "BJP_K_P_BABURAJ_MASTER", "CPI_ASHRAFALI_KALIYATH": "CPI_ASHRAFALI_KALIYATH", "SDPI_P_P_SHOWKATHALI": "SDPI_P_P_SHOWKATHALI", "INC_ARYADAN_MOHAMMED": "INC_ARYADAN_MOHAMMED", "IND_35_PROFESSOR_M_THOMAS_MATHEW": "IND_35_PROFESSOR_M_THOMAS_MATHEW", "BJP_K_C_VELAYUDHAN": "BJP_K_C_VELAYUDHAN", "SDPI_C_G_UNNI": "SDPI_C_G_UNNI", "BSP_THARIYAN_KILIYAN": "BSP_THARIYAN_KILIYAN", "IND_35_THOMAS_MATHEW": "IND_35_THOMAS_MATHEW", "INC_A_P_ANILKUMAR": "INC_A_P_ANILKUMAR", "CPM_V_RAMESAN": "CPM_V_RAMESAN", "BJP_KOTHERI_AYYAPPAN": "BJP_KOTHERI_AYYAPPAN", "SDPI_KRISHNAN_ERANHIKKAL": "SDPI_KRISHNAN_ERANHIKKAL", "IND_36_P_ANILKUMAR": "IND_36_P_ANILKUMAR", "IND_36_T_C_THEYYAN": "IND_36_T_C_THEYYAN", "MUL_ADV_M_UMMER": "MUL_ADV_M_UMMER", "CPI_PROF_P_GOURI": "CPI_PROF_P_GOURI", "BJP_P_G_UPENDRAN": "BJP_P_G_UPENDRAN", "SDPI_JALEEL_NEELAMBRA": "SDPI_JALEEL_NEELAMBRA", "IND_37_FEROZ_BABU_ISHTADANAM": "IND_37_FEROZ_BABU_ISHTADANAM", "BSP_SHAMSUDHEEN_ASLAMI": "BSP_SHAMSUDHEEN_ASLAMI", "MUL_MANJALAMKUZHI_ALI": "MUL_MANJALAMKUZHI_ALI", "CPM_SASIKUMAR": "CPM_SASIKUMAR", "BJP_C_K_KUNHIMUHAMMED": "BJP_C_K_KUNHIMUHAMMED", "SDPI_SAIDALIKKUTTY_SAEED_MADANI": "SDPI_SAIDALIKKUTTY_SAEED_MADANI", "IND_38_MOHAMMED_ALI": "IND_38_MOHAMMED_ALI", "MUL_T_A_AHMED_KABEER": "MUL_T_A_AHMED_KABEER", "CPM_KADEEJA_SATHAR": "CPM_KADEEJA_SATHAR", "BJP_MANIKANDAN_K": "BJP_MANIKANDAN_K", "SDPI_DR_C_H_ASHRAF": "SDPI_DR_C_H_ASHRAF", "IND_39_ANWAR_BABU": "IND_39_ANWAR_BABU", "MUL_P_UBAIDULLA": "MUL_P_UBAIDULLA", "JD_S_MADATHIL_SADIKALI": "JD_S_MADATHIL_SADIKALI", "SDPI_ADVOCATE_SADIK_NADUTHODI": "SDPI_ADVOCATE_SADIK_NADUTHODI", "BJP_K_VELAYUDHAN": "BJP_K_VELAYUDHAN", "IND_40_ABU_THWAHIR": "IND_40_ABU_THWAHIR", "IND_40_POOKK_ATTIL_ALI_HAJI": "IND_40_POOKK_ATTIL_ALI_HAJI", "MUL_P_K_KUNHALIKUTTY": "MUL_P_K_KUNHALIKUTTY", "INL_K_P_ISMAYIL": "INL_K_P_ISMAYIL", "SDPI_ABDUL_MAJEED_FAIZI": "SDPI_ABDUL_MAJEED_FAIZI", "BJP_SUBRAHMANIAN": "BJP_SUBRAHMANIAN", "IND_41_K_P_ISMAYIL_KALLUPARAMBA_N": "IND_41_K_P_ISMAYIL_KALLUPARAMBA_N", "IND_41_KUNHALIKUTTY_K_P": "IND_41_KUNHALIKUTTY_K_P", "BSP_SAFARUDEEN": "BSP_SAFARUDEEN", "IND_41_ISMAYIL_K_T": "IND_41_ISMAYIL_K_T", "MUL_ADV_K_N_A_KHADER": "MUL_ADV_K_N_A_KHADER", "IND_42_K_V_SANKARANARAYANAN": "IND_42_K_V_SANKARANARAYANAN", "BJP_PREMAN_MASTER": "BJP_PREMAN_MASTER", "PDP_SALAM_MOONNIYUR": "PDP_SALAM_MOONNIYUR", "SDPI_ABDUL_LATHEEF": "SDPI_ABDUL_LATHEEF", "BSP_NEELAKANTAN_CHELARI": "BSP_NEELAKANTAN_CHELARI", "MUL_P_K_ABDU_RABB": "MUL_P_K_ABDU_RABB", "CPI_ADV_K_K_ABDU_SAMAD": "CPI_ADV_K_K_ABDU_SAMAD", "BJP_SASIDHARAN_PUNNASSERY": "BJP_SASIDHARAN_PUNNASSERY", "PDP_IBRAHIM_THIRURANGADI": "PDP_IBRAHIM_THIRURANGADI", "SDPI_ADV_A_A_RAHIM": "SDPI_ADV_A_A_RAHIM", "BSP_ABUYAZAR": "BSP_ABUYAZAR", "MUL_ABDURAHIMAN_RANDATHANI": "MUL_ABDURAHIMAN_RANDATHANI", "CPM_E_JAYAN": "CPM_E_JAYAN", "BJP_RAVI_THELATH": "BJP_RAVI_THELATH", "SDPI_K_K_MAJEED_KHASIMI": "SDPI_K_K_MAJEED_KHASIMI", "MUL_C_MAMMOOTTY": "MUL_C_MAMMOOTTY", "CPM_P_P_ABDULLAKUTTY": "CPM_P_P_ABDULLAKUTTY", "BJP_P_T_ALI_HAJI": "BJP_P_T_ALI_HAJI", "SDPI_A_K_MAJEED_MASTER": "SDPI_A_K_MAJEED_MASTER", "PDP_ALIKUTTY_ALIAS_BAPPU_PUTHANATHANI": "PDP_ALIKUTTY_ALIAS_BAPPU_PUTHANATHANI", "IND_45_MOHANDAS": "IND_45_MOHANDAS", "BSP_T_AYYAPPAN": "BSP_T_AYYAPPAN", "MUL_ABDUSSAMAD_SAMADANI": "MUL_ABDUSSAMAD_SAMADANI", "NCP_DR_C_P_K_GURUKKAL": "NCP_DR_C_P_K_GURUKKAL", "BJP_K_K_SURENDRAN": "BJP_K_K_SURENDRAN", "PDP_ALI_KADAMPUZHA": "PDP_ALI_KADAMPUZHA", "SDPI_ADV_K_C_NASEER": "SDPI_ADV_K_C_NASEER", "IND_46_KADAMPUZHA_BINDHU_DEVARAJAN": "IND_46_KADAMPUZHA_BINDHU_DEVARAJAN", "BSP_MADATHIL_MUHAMMAD_ELLIAS": "BSP_MADATHIL_MUHAMMAD_ELLIAS", "IND_47_DR_K_T_JALEEL": "IND_47_DR_K_T_JALEEL", "INC_ADV_V_V_PRAKASH": "INC_ADV_V_V_PRAKASH", "BJP_NIRMALA_KUTTIKRISHNAN_PUNNAKKAL": "BJP_NIRMALA_KUTTIKRISHNAN_PUNNAKKAL", "SDPI_NURUL_HACK": "SDPI_NURUL_HACK", "IND_47_V_V_PRAKASHAN": "IND_47_V_V_PRAKASHAN", "IND_47_T_A_JALEEL": "IND_47_T_A_JALEEL", "IND_47_T_K_JALEEL": "IND_47_T_K_JALEEL", "BSP_NANDA_KUMAR": "BSP_NANDA_KUMAR", "CPM_P_SREERAMAKRISHNAN": "CPM_P_SREERAMAKRISHNAN", "INC_P_T_AJAY_MOHAN": "INC_P_T_AJAY_MOHAN", "BJP_V_T_JAYAPRAKASH_MASTER": "BJP_V_T_JAYAPRAKASH_MASTER", "SDPI_YAHIYA_KOYA_THANGAL": "SDPI_YAHIYA_KOYA_THANGAL", "IND_48_AJAYAN": "IND_48_AJAYAN", "INC_ADV_V_T_BALRAM": "INC_ADV_V_T_BALRAM", "CPM_MAMMIKUTTY_P": "CPM_MAMMIKUTTY_P", "BJP_V_RAMANKUTTY": "BJP_V_RAMANKUTTY", "SDPI_BABURAJAN_O_T": "SDPI_BABURAJAN_O_T", "IND_49_P_MAMMIKUTTY": "IND_49_P_MAMMIKUTTY", "PDP_P_SHAMSUDHEEN": "PDP_P_SHAMSUDHEEN", "BSP_RAMESAN_PERUMANNUR": "BSP_RAMESAN_PERUMANNUR", "IND_49_K_BALARAMAN": "IND_49_K_BALARAMAN", "INC_C_P_MOHAMMED": "INC_C_P_MOHAMMED", "CPI_K_P_SURESH_RAJ": "CPI_K_P_SURESH_RAJ", "BJP_POOKKATTIRI_BABU": "BJP_POOKKATTIRI_BABU", "SDPI_ADV_K_M_ASHARAF": "SDPI_ADV_K_M_ASHARAF", "IND_50_SURESH": "IND_50_SURESH", "BSP_ASHARAF_ALI_VALLAPPUZHA": "BSP_ASHARAF_ALI_VALLAPPUZHA", "PDP_MASEEF_HAJI": "PDP_MASEEF_HAJI", "CPM_K_S_SALEEKHA": "CPM_K_S_SALEEKHA", "INC_SANTHA_JAYARAM": "INC_SANTHA_JAYARAM", "BJP_V_B_MURALIDHARAN": "BJP_V_B_MURALIDHARAN", "SDPI_KHALID_A": "SDPI_KHALID_A", "BSP_M_C_VELAYUDHAN": "BSP_M_C_VELAYUDHAN", "CPM_M_HAMZA": "CPM_M_HAMZA", "INC_V_K_SREEKANDAN": "INC_V_K_SREEKANDAN", "BJP_P_VENUGOPALAN": "BJP_P_VENUGOPALAN", "SDPI_E_S_KAJAHUSSAIN": "SDPI_E_S_KAJAHUSSAIN", "IND_52_M_HAMZA": "IND_52_M_HAMZA", "BSP_K_T_PADMINI": "BSP_K_T_PADMINI", "IND_52_N_HAMZA": "IND_52_N_HAMZA", "IND_52_ARAVINDAN_KARIMPUZHA": "IND_52_ARAVINDAN_KARIMPUZHA", "CPM_K_V_VIJAYADAS": "CPM_K_V_VIJAYADAS", "INC_P_SWAMINATHAN": "INC_P_SWAMINATHAN", "BJP_V_DEVAYANI": "BJP_V_DEVAYANI", "IND_53_VIJAYADASAN": "IND_53_VIJAYADASAN", "BSP_K_VELAYUDHAN": "BSP_K_VELAYUDHAN", "MUL_ADVOCATE_N_SAMSUDHEEN": "MUL_ADVOCATE_N_SAMSUDHEEN", "CPI_V_CHAMUNNI": "CPI_V_CHAMUNNI", "BJP_O_P_VASUDEVANUNNI": "BJP_O_P_VASUDEVANUNNI", "IND_54_CHAMUNNI": "IND_54_CHAMUNNI", "SDPI_MUHAMMED_GAFOOR_MADANI": "SDPI_MUHAMMED_GAFOOR_MADANI", "BSP_RAMAKRISHNAN_A": "BSP_RAMAKRISHNAN_A", "CPM_V_S_ACHUTHANANDAN": "CPM_V_S_ACHUTHANANDAN", "INC_LATHIKA_SUBHASH": "INC_LATHIKA_SUBHASH", "JD_U_ADV_P_K_MAJEED_PEDIKKATT": "JD_U_ADV_P_K_MAJEED_PEDIKKATT", "BSP_RAVI_PALLATHERI": "BSP_RAVI_PALLATHERI", "INC_SHAFI_PARAMBIL": "INC_SHAFI_PARAMBIL", "CPM_K_K_DIVAKARAN": "CPM_K_K_DIVAKARAN", "BJP_C_UDAYBHASKAR": "BJP_C_UDAYBHASKAR", "IND_56_SHAJI_ABRAHAM": "IND_56_SHAJI_ABRAHAM", "BSP_HARI_ARUMBIL": "BSP_HARI_ARUMBIL", "IND_56_MUHAMMED_SHAFI_SHAFI_PURAKARA": "IND_56_MUHAMMED_SHAFI_SHAFI_PURAKARA", "ADMK_C_SAMPATH": "ADMK_C_SAMPATH", "IND_56_DIVAKARAN": "IND_56_DIVAKARAN", "CPM_A_K_BALAN": "CPM_A_K_BALAN", "KEC_J_N_VINESH": "KEC_J_N_VINESH", "BJP_M_LAKSHMANAN": "BJP_M_LAKSHMANAN", "BSP_P_C_NARAYANANKUTTY": "BSP_P_C_NARAYANANKUTTY", "IND_57_K_VINESH": "IND_57_K_VINESH", "INC_K_ACHUTHAN": "INC_K_ACHUTHAN", "CPM_S_SUBHASH_CHANDRABOSE": "CPM_S_SUBHASH_CHANDRABOSE", "BJP_A_K_OMANAKUTTAN": "BJP_A_K_OMANAKUTTAN", "IND_58_K_KALADHARAN": "IND_58_K_KALADHARAN", "SDPI_A_MUHAMED_HANEEFA": "SDPI_A_MUHAMED_HANEEFA", "BSP_V_LAKSHMI": "BSP_V_LAKSHMI", "IND_58_K_ACHUTHAN": "IND_58_K_ACHUTHAN", "SUCI_A_RAJEENA": "SUCI_A_RAJEENA", "CPM_V_CHENTHAMARAKSHAN": "CPM_V_CHENTHAMARAKSHAN", "CMPKSC_M_V_RAGHAVAN": "CMPKSC_M_V_RAGHAVAN", "BJP_N_SIVARAJAN": "BJP_N_SIVARAJAN", "SDPI_SAKKEER_HUSSAIN": "SDPI_SAKKEER_HUSSAIN", "BSP_CHANDRAN": "BSP_CHANDRAN", "ADMK_SUGUNAN_S": "ADMK_SUGUNAN_S", "CPI_ML_L_JOY_PETER_T": "CPI_ML_L_JOY_PETER_T", "CPM_M_CHANDRAN": "CPM_M_CHANDRAN", "KEC_M_ADV_K_KUSALA_KUMAR": "KEC_M_ADV_K_KUSALA_KUMAR", "BJP_K_A_SULAIMAN": "BJP_K_A_SULAIMAN", "BSP_P_D_PAULOSE": "BSP_P_D_PAULOSE", "CPM_K_RADHAKRISHNAN": "CPM_K_RADHAKRISHNAN", "INC_K_B_SASIKUMAR": "INC_K_B_SASIKUMAR", "BJP_V_A_KRISHNAKUMARAN": "BJP_V_A_KRISHNAKUMARAN", "SDPI_A_SUBRAHMANIAN": "SDPI_A_SUBRAHMANIAN", "BSP_SURESH_BABU": "BSP_SURESH_BABU", "CPM_BABU_M_PALISSERY": "CPM_BABU_M_PALISSERY", "CMPKSC_C_P_JOHN": "CMPKSC_C_P_JOHN", "BJP_ADV_K_K_ANEESHKUMAR": "BJP_ADV_K_K_ANEESHKUMAR", "IND_62_K_P_PREMAN": "IND_62_K_P_PREMAN", "IND_62_JOHN": "IND_62_JOHN", "BSP_UNNIKRISHNAN_VAROLI": "BSP_UNNIKRISHNAN_VAROLI", "CPM_K_V_ABDUL_KHADER": "CPM_K_V_ABDUL_KHADER", "MUL_ASHARAF_KOKKUR": "MUL_ASHARAF_KOKKUR", "BJP_DAYANANDAN_MAMPULLY": "BJP_DAYANANDAN_MAMPULLY", "SDPI_ASHARAFVADAKOOT": "SDPI_ASHARAFVADAKOOT", "IND_63_ADV_SHAMEERBABU": "IND_63_ADV_SHAMEERBABU", "IND_63_K_V_ABDULKHADER": "IND_63_K_V_ABDULKHADER", "IND_63_VIJAYANATH": "IND_63_VIJAYANATH", "SUCI_C_V_PREMRAJ": "SUCI_C_V_PREMRAJ", "INC_P_A_MADHAVAN": "INC_P_A_MADHAVAN", "CPM_BABY_JOHN": "CPM_BABY_JOHN", "BJP_P_M_GOPINATHAN": "BJP_P_M_GOPINATHAN", "SDPI_P_K_USMAN": "SDPI_P_K_USMAN", "BSP_SURESH_TACHAPPILLY": "BSP_SURESH_TACHAPPILLY", "KJ_ARAVINDAKSHAN_M_K": "KJ_ARAVINDAKSHAN_M_K", "INC_C_N_BALAKRISHNAN": "INC_C_N_BALAKRISHNAN", "CPM_N_R_BALAN": "CPM_N_R_BALAN", "BJP_SHAJUMON_VATTEKAD": "BJP_SHAJUMON_VATTEKAD", "BSP_GOVINDAN_MACHAD": "BSP_GOVINDAN_MACHAD", "IND_65_BALAKRISHNAN": "IND_65_BALAKRISHNAN", "INC_M_P_VINCENT": "INC_M_P_VINCENT", "CPI_RAJAJI_MATHEW_THOMAS": "CPI_RAJAJI_MATHEW_THOMAS", "BJP_SUNDARARAJAN_MASTER": "BJP_SUNDARARAJAN_MASTER", "IND_66_SURESH_M_R": "IND_66_SURESH_M_R", "BSP_SUNNY_K_JOHN": "BSP_SUNNY_K_JOHN", "IND_66_RATHEESH_T_NAIR": "IND_66_RATHEESH_T_NAIR", "INC_ADV_THERAMBIL_RAMAKRISHNAN": "INC_ADV_THERAMBIL_RAMAKRISHNAN", "CPI_P_BALACHANDRAN": "CPI_P_BALACHANDRAN", "BJP_ADV_RAVIKUMAR_UPPATH": "BJP_ADV_RAVIKUMAR_UPPATH", "IND_67_THERAMBIL_RAMAKRISHNAN": "IND_67_THERAMBIL_RAMAKRISHNAN", "BSP_ADV_A_JAYARAM": "BSP_ADV_A_JAYARAM", "CPI_GEETHA_GOPI": "CPI_GEETHA_GOPI", "IND_68_VIKAS_CHAKRAPANI": "IND_68_VIKAS_CHAKRAPANI", "BJP_SARJU_THOYAKKAVU": "BJP_SARJU_THOYAKKAVU", "IND_68_DINESH_KUMAR_E_V": "IND_68_DINESH_KUMAR_E_V", "IND_68_M_S_VASANTHY": "IND_68_M_S_VASANTHY", "BSP_P_K_SUBRAMANIAN": "BSP_P_K_SUBRAMANIAN", "IND_68_N_V_MANI": "IND_68_N_V_MANI", "IND_68_C_K_CHANDRAN": "IND_68_C_K_CHANDRAN", "IND_68_PUSHPAKARAN": "IND_68_PUSHPAKARAN", "CPI_ADV_V_S_SUNILKUMAR": "CPI_ADV_V_S_SUNILKUMAR", "JPSS_UMESH_CHALLIYIL": "JPSS_UMESH_CHALLIYIL", "BJP_A_N_RADHAKRISHNAN": "BJP_A_N_RADHAKRISHNAN", "IND_69_M_M_MANOJ": "IND_69_M_M_MANOJ", "BSP_P_A_KUTTAPPAN": "BSP_P_A_KUTTAPPAN", "IND_69_C_U_NIMI": "IND_69_C_U_NIMI", "KEC_M_ADV_THOMAS_UNNIYADAN": "KEC_M_ADV_THOMAS_UNNIYADAN", "CPM_ADV_K_R_VIJAYA": "CPM_ADV_K_R_VIJAYA", "BJP_K_C_VENU_MASTER": "BJP_K_C_VENU_MASTER", "IND_70_T_V_SIVADASAN": "IND_70_T_V_SIVADASAN", "BSP_SUBRAMANIAN": "BSP_SUBRAMANIAN", "CPM_PROF_C_RAVEENDRANATH": "CPM_PROF_C_RAVEENDRANATH", "INC_ADV_K_P_VISWANATHAN": "INC_ADV_K_P_VISWANATHAN", "BJP_SOBHA_SURENDRAN": "BJP_SOBHA_SURENDRAN", "IND_71_P_J_MONSY": "IND_71_P_J_MONSY", "BSP_P_C_PUSHPAKARAN": "BSP_P_C_PUSHPAKARAN", "IND_71_PAULSON_KALLOOR": "IND_71_PAULSON_KALLOOR", "IND_71_K_V_PURUSHOTHAMAN": "IND_71_K_V_PURUSHOTHAMAN", "CPM_DEVASSY_B_D": "CPM_DEVASSY_B_D", "INC_BENNY_K_T": "INC_BENNY_K_T", "BJP_ADV_SUDHEER_BABY": "BJP_ADV_SUDHEER_BABY", "IND_72_PUSHPANGADAN_P_M": "IND_72_PUSHPANGADAN_P_M", "BSP_SUBRAMANIAN_V_K": "BSP_SUBRAMANIAN_V_K", "IND_72_JAYAKUMAR_E": "IND_72_JAYAKUMAR_E", "INC_T_N_PRATHAPAN": "INC_T_N_PRATHAPAN", "CPI_K_G_SIVANANDHAN": "CPI_K_G_SIVANANDHAN", "BJP_I_R_VIJAYAN": "BJP_I_R_VIJAYAN", "BSP_AMBILY_UNNIKRISHNAN": "BSP_AMBILY_UNNIKRISHNAN", "IND_73_HARIDAS_K_B": "IND_73_HARIDAS_K_B", "IND_73_RAJESH_APPATT": "IND_73_RAJESH_APPATT", "IND_73_ALLY_RAVI": "IND_73_ALLY_RAVI", "SUCI_SUJA_ANTONY": "SUCI_SUJA_ANTONY", "IND_73_T_U_RADHAKRISHNAN": "IND_73_T_U_RADHAKRISHNAN", "CPM_SAJU_PAUL": "CPM_SAJU_PAUL", "INC_ADV_JAISON_JOSEPH": "INC_ADV_JAISON_JOSEPH", "BJP_O_C_ASOKAN": "BJP_O_C_ASOKAN", "SDPI_O_ALIYAR": "SDPI_O_ALIYAR", "PDP_N_K_MUHAMMED_HAJI": "PDP_N_K_MUHAMMED_HAJI", "SHS_P_N_SUNILKUMAR": "SHS_P_N_SUNILKUMAR", "CPI_ML_L_BINDU_JAYAN": "CPI_ML_L_BINDU_JAYAN", "JD_S_ADVOCATE_JOSE_THETTAYIL": "JD_S_ADVOCATE_JOSE_THETTAYIL", "KEC_J_ADVOCATE_JOHNY_NELLOOR": "KEC_J_ADVOCATE_JOHNY_NELLOOR", "BJP_M_A_BRAHMARAJ": "BJP_M_A_BRAHMARAJ", "IND_75_JOHNSON_I_T_INCHAKADAN_JOHNY": "IND_75_JOHNSON_I_T_INCHAKADAN_JOHNY", "BSP_M_G_PURUSHOTHAMAN": "BSP_M_G_PURUSHOTHAMAN", "KJ_POULOSE_KIDANGEN": "KJ_POULOSE_KIDANGEN", "SUCI_K_C_JAYAN": "SUCI_K_C_JAYAN", "SWJP_FRANCIS_NJALIYAN": "SWJP_FRANCIS_NJALIYAN", "IND_75_JOHNSON": "IND_75_JOHNSON", "IND_75_JOHN_CHACKO": "IND_75_JOHN_CHACKO", "INC_ANWAR_SADATH": "INC_ANWAR_SADATH", "CPM_A_M_YOUSAF": "CPM_A_M_YOUSAF", "BJP_M_N_GOPI": "BJP_M_N_GOPI", "SDPI_ROY_ARACKAL": "SDPI_ROY_ARACKAL", "IND_76_M_M_YOOSAF_MUNDAKKAL": "IND_76_M_M_YOOSAF_MUNDAKKAL", "IND_76_ANWAR_SADATH_PANACKAPARAMBIL": "IND_76_ANWAR_SADATH_PANACKAPARAMBIL", "SHS_K_Y_KUNJUMON": "SHS_K_Y_KUNJUMON", "BSP_ABDUL_AZEEZ": "BSP_ABDUL_AZEEZ", "IND_76_ANTONY_JOSEPH_MANJOORAN": "IND_76_ANTONY_JOSEPH_MANJOORAN", "SUCI_K_K_SOBHA": "SUCI_K_K_SOBHA", "MUL_V_K_EBRAHIM_KUNJU": "MUL_V_K_EBRAHIM_KUNJU", "CPM_K_CHANDRAN_PILLAI": "CPM_K_CHANDRAN_PILLAI", "BJP_ADV_P_KRISHNADAS": "BJP_ADV_P_KRISHNADAS", "SDPI_P_A_MUHAMMED_ASLAM": "SDPI_P_A_MUHAMMED_ASLAM", "IND_77_T_A_MUJEEB_RAHMAN": "IND_77_T_A_MUJEEB_RAHMAN", "IND_77_CHANDRASEKHARA_PILLAI": "IND_77_CHANDRASEKHARA_PILLAI", "BSP_GIREESH_BABU_G": "BSP_GIREESH_BABU_G", "IND_77_SHIBU_THATTAMPADI": "IND_77_SHIBU_THATTAMPADI", "ADMK_D_SUNDARA_MOORTHY": "ADMK_D_SUNDARA_MOORTHY", "IND_77_K_P_MOHANAN": "IND_77_K_P_MOHANAN", "INC_ADV_V_D_SATHEESAN": "INC_ADV_V_D_SATHEESAN", "CPI_PANNIAN_RAVEEDNRAN": "CPI_PANNIAN_RAVEEDNRAN", "BJP_E_S_PURUSHOTHAMAN": "BJP_E_S_PURUSHOTHAMAN", "IND_78_K_K_JYOTHIVAS": "IND_78_K_K_JYOTHIVAS", "IND_78_P_S_RAJENDRA_PRASAD": "IND_78_P_S_RAJENDRA_PRASAD", "IND_78_P_P_RAVEENDRAN": "IND_78_P_P_RAVEENDRAN", "BSP_M_MANOJ": "BSP_M_MANOJ", "CPM_S_SARMA": "CPM_S_SARMA", "INC_AJAY_THARAYIL": "INC_AJAY_THARAYIL", "BJP_T_G_SURENDRAN": "BJP_T_G_SURENDRAN", "BSP_T_K_SIVANANDAN": "BSP_T_K_SIVANANDAN", "IND_79_SANTHOSH_SARMA": "IND_79_SANTHOSH_SARMA", "IND_79_BENNY_JOSEPH": "IND_79_BENNY_JOSEPH", "INC_DOMINIC_PRESENTATION": "INC_DOMINIC_PRESENTATION", "CPM_M_C_JOSEPHINE": "CPM_M_C_JOSEPHINE", "BJP_K_SASIDHARAN_MASTER": "BJP_K_SASIDHARAN_MASTER", "SDPI_YOOSUF_MUFTHI": "SDPI_YOOSUF_MUFTHI", "IND_80_DOMINIC_C_J": "IND_80_DOMINIC_C_J", "BSP_KAMARUDHEEN_T_A": "BSP_KAMARUDHEEN_T_A", "IND_80_A_P_IBRAHIM_KUTTY": "IND_80_A_P_IBRAHIM_KUTTY", "IND_80_ADV_JACOB_PULIKKAN": "IND_80_ADV_JACOB_PULIKKAN", "IND_80_T_A_KRISHNAN_KUTTY": "IND_80_T_A_KRISHNAN_KUTTY", "INC_K_BABU": "INC_K_BABU", "CPM_C_M_DINESH_MANI": "CPM_C_M_DINESH_MANI", "BJP_ADV_SABU_VARGHEESE": "BJP_ADV_SABU_VARGHEESE", "BSP_KARTIKEYAN": "BSP_KARTIKEYAN", "IND_81_BABU_KEEZHATHUPARAMBU": "IND_81_BABU_KEEZHATHUPARAMBU", "IND_81_SAJU_KOLATTUKUDY": "IND_81_SAJU_KOLATTUKUDY", "SHS_SAJI_THURUTHIKUNNEL": "SHS_SAJI_THURUTHIKUNNEL", "IND_81_P_K_THANKAMANI": "IND_81_P_K_THANKAMANI", "IND_81_K_P_AYYAPPAN": "IND_81_K_P_AYYAPPAN", "INC_HIBI_EDEN": "INC_HIBI_EDEN", "IND_82_DR_SEBASTIAN_PAUL": "IND_82_DR_SEBASTIAN_PAUL", "BJP_C_G_RAJAGOPAL": "BJP_C_G_RAJAGOPAL", "IND_82_SEBASTIAN_NJALAMKUNNEL": "IND_82_SEBASTIAN_NJALAMKUNNEL", "BSP_IQBAL_THAMARASSERY": "BSP_IQBAL_THAMARASSERY", "SHS_T_R_VASUDEVAN": "SHS_T_R_VASUDEVAN", "INC_BENNY_BEHANAN": "INC_BENNY_BEHANAN", "CPM_M_E_HASSAINAR": "CPM_M_E_HASSAINAR", "BJP_N_SAJI_KUMAR": "BJP_N_SAJI_KUMAR", "IND_83_HASSAINAR": "IND_83_HASSAINAR", "SDPI_ABDUL_SALAM_PARAKKADAN": "SDPI_ABDUL_SALAM_PARAKKADAN", "IND_83_BENNY_GEORGE": "IND_83_BENNY_GEORGE", "BSP_SHEREEF_THANKAYATHIL": "BSP_SHEREEF_THANKAYATHIL", "INC_V_P_SAJEENDRAN": "INC_V_P_SAJEENDRAN", "CPM_M_A_SURENDRAN": "CPM_M_A_SURENDRAN", "BJP_M_RAVI": "BJP_M_RAVI", "SDPI_M_K_MANOJ_KUMAR": "SDPI_M_K_MANOJ_KUMAR", "BSP_RAJEEV_P_T": "BSP_RAJEEV_P_T", "KEC_J_T_M_JACOB": "KEC_J_T_M_JACOB", "CPM_M_J_JACOB": "CPM_M_J_JACOB", "BJP_M_N_MADHU": "BJP_M_N_MADHU", "BSP_JOSHY_JOSEPH": "BSP_JOSHY_JOSEPH", "IND_85_SABU_KUNJAPPAN": "IND_85_SABU_KUNJAPPAN", "SUCI_M_K_USHA": "SUCI_M_K_USHA", "INC_JOSEPH_VAZHACKKAN": "INC_JOSEPH_VAZHACKKAN", "CPI_BABU_PAUL": "CPI_BABU_PAUL", "BJP_JIJI_JOSEPH": "BJP_JIJI_JOSEPH", "IND_86_BIJU_SREEDHARAN": "IND_86_BIJU_SREEDHARAN", "BSP_BOBY_KALLOOR": "BSP_BOBY_KALLOOR", "KEC_M_SHEV_T_U_KURUVILLA": "KEC_M_SHEV_T_U_KURUVILLA", "IND_87_COMMANDER_SKARIAH_THOMAS": "IND_87_COMMANDER_SKARIAH_THOMAS", "BJP_ADV_K_RADHAKRISHNAN": "BJP_ADV_K_RADHAKRISHNAN", "SDPI_SHINE_MUHAMMED": "SDPI_SHINE_MUHAMMED", "IND_87_SKARIA_THOMAS": "IND_87_SKARIA_THOMAS", "IND_87_T_T_KURUVILA": "IND_87_T_T_KURUVILA", "IND_87_DEVAKI_NARAYANAN": "IND_87_DEVAKI_NARAYANAN", "IND_87_JOY_DAVASIA": "IND_87_JOY_DAVASIA", "IND_87_SKARIA_THOMMAN": "IND_87_SKARIA_THOMMAN", "BSP_SOMINI_PRABHAKARAN": "BSP_SOMINI_PRABHAKARAN", "CPM_S_RAJENDRAN": "CPM_S_RAJENDRAN", "INC_A_K_MONI": "INC_A_K_MONI", "BJP_S_RAJAGOPAL": "BJP_S_RAJAGOPAL", "IND_88_SELVARAJ_MADASWAMI": "IND_88_SELVARAJ_MADASWAMI", "BSP_T_C_THANKAPPAN": "BSP_T_C_THANKAPPAN", "ADMK_MALLIKA": "ADMK_MALLIKA", "SDPI_RAJU_AYYAPPAN": "SDPI_RAJU_AYYAPPAN", "IND_88_P_K_MANI": "IND_88_P_K_MANI", "IND_88_MANIKANDAN_K": "IND_88_MANIKANDAN_K", "CPM_K_K_JAYACHANDRAN": "CPM_K_K_JAYACHANDRAN", "INC_ADV_JOSSY_SEBASTIAN": "INC_ADV_JOSSY_SEBASTIAN", "BJP_NARAYANA_RAJU": "BJP_NARAYANA_RAJU", "SDPI_MUHAMMED_SHARAFUDHEEN": "SDPI_MUHAMMED_SHARAFUDHEEN", "BSP_BENNY_THOMAS": "BSP_BENNY_THOMAS", "IND_89_K_C_MAMMACHAN": "IND_89_K_C_MAMMACHAN", "KEC_M_P_J_JOSEPH": "KEC_M_P_J_JOSEPH", "IND_90_PROF_JOSEPH_AUGUSTINE": "IND_90_PROF_JOSEPH_AUGUSTINE", "BJP_P_M_VELAYUDHAN": "BJP_P_M_VELAYUDHAN", "SDPI_M_A_NAJEEB": "SDPI_M_A_NAJEEB", "BSP_BINU_SEBASTIAN": "BSP_BINU_SEBASTIAN", "IND_90_C_R_DILEEP_KUMAR": "IND_90_C_R_DILEEP_KUMAR", "IND_90_T_S_SREENIVASAN": "IND_90_T_S_SREENIVASAN", "IND_90_JOMON_JOHN": "IND_90_JOMON_JOHN", "SUCI_SIBY_C_MATHEW": "SUCI_SIBY_C_MATHEW", "KJ_SHIBU_MON": "KJ_SHIBU_MON", "KEC_M_ROSHY_AUGUSTINE": "KEC_M_ROSHY_AUGUSTINE", "CPM_C_V_VARGHESE": "CPM_C_V_VARGHESE", "BJP_C_C_KRISHNAN": "BJP_C_C_KRISHNAN", "IND_91_KANCHIYAR_PEETHAMBARAN": "IND_91_KANCHIYAR_PEETHAMBARAN", "IND_91_P_C_PRABHAKARAN": "IND_91_P_C_PRABHAKARAN", "IND_91_M_K_NARAYANAN": "IND_91_M_K_NARAYANAN", "IND_91_V_LAKSHMANAN": "IND_91_V_LAKSHMANAN", "CPI_E_S_BIJIMOL": "CPI_E_S_BIJIMOL", "INC_ADV_E_M_AUGUSTHY": "INC_ADV_E_M_AUGUSTHY", "BJP_P_P_SANU": "BJP_P_P_SANU", "IND_92_M_K_SUPPU_ROYAL": "IND_92_M_K_SUPPU_ROYAL", "IND_92_K_D_VASUDEVAN": "IND_92_K_D_VASUDEVAN", "BSP_BIJU_MATTAPPALLY": "BSP_BIJU_MATTAPPALLY", "SDPI_P_S_MADHU": "SDPI_P_S_MADHU", "IND_92_AUGUSTHY_M": "IND_92_AUGUSTHY_M", "IND_92_JOSEPH_JACOB": "IND_92_JOSEPH_JACOB", "KEC_M_K_M_MANI": "KEC_M_K_M_MANI", "NCP_MANI_C_KAPPEN": "NCP_MANI_C_KAPPEN", "BJP_PROF_B_VIJAYAKUMAR": "BJP_PROF_B_VIJAYAKUMAR", "IND_93_C_V_JOHN": "IND_93_C_V_JOHN", "IND_93_JAMES_JOSEPH": "IND_93_JAMES_JOSEPH", "KEC_M_ADV_MONS_JOSEPH": "KEC_M_ADV_MONS_JOSEPH", "KC_AMG_STEPHEN_GEORGE": "KC_AMG_STEPHEN_GEORGE", "BJP_P_G_BIJUKUMAR": "BJP_P_G_BIJUKUMAR", "BSP_M_D_THOMAS": "BSP_M_D_THOMAS", "CPI_K_AJITH": "CPI_K_AJITH", "INC_A_SANEESHKUMAR": "INC_A_SANEESHKUMAR", "BJP_RAMESH_KAVIMATTAM": "BJP_RAMESH_KAVIMATTAM", "IND_95_K_SANESH": "IND_95_K_SANESH", "BSP_P_K_PRAKASAN": "BSP_P_K_PRAKASAN", "SUCI_K_S_SASIKALA": "SUCI_K_S_SASIKALA", "IND_95_M_K_DASAN": "IND_95_M_K_DASAN", "CPM_ADV_K_SURESH_KURUP": "CPM_ADV_K_SURESH_KURUP", "KEC_M_THOMAS_CHAZHIKADAN": "KEC_M_THOMAS_CHAZHIKADAN", "BJP_V_G_GOPAKUMAR": "BJP_V_G_GOPAKUMAR", "BSP_K_T_THOMAS": "BSP_K_T_THOMAS", "IND_96_JUSTIN_MATHEW": "IND_96_JUSTIN_MATHEW", "SUCI_E_V_PRAKASH": "SUCI_E_V_PRAKASH", "IND_96_ANISH_KUMAR": "IND_96_ANISH_KUMAR", "INC_THIRUVANCHOOR_RADHAKRISHNAN": "INC_THIRUVANCHOOR_RADHAKRISHNAN", "CPM_V_N_VASAVAN": "CPM_V_N_VASAVAN", "BJP_ADV_NARAYANAN_NAMBOOTHIRI": "BJP_ADV_NARAYANAN_NAMBOOTHIRI", "BSP_V_S_SHAJAN": "BSP_V_S_SHAJAN", "IND_97_RAJEEV_ABRAHAM": "IND_97_RAJEEV_ABRAHAM", "SUCI_N_K_BIJU": "SUCI_N_K_BIJU", "IND_97_GEORGE_P_ELIAS": "IND_97_GEORGE_P_ELIAS", "INC_OOMMEN_CHANDY": "INC_OOMMEN_CHANDY", "CPM_SUJA_SUSAN_GEORGE": "CPM_SUJA_SUSAN_GEORGE", "BJP_P_SUNILKUMAR": "BJP_P_SUNILKUMAR", "BSP_ADV_SAJI_K_CHERAMAN": "BSP_ADV_SAJI_K_CHERAMAN", "IND_98_ADV_JAYAKUMAR_KAVUNKAL": "IND_98_ADV_JAYAKUMAR_KAVUNKAL", "KEC_M_C_F_THOMAS": "KEC_M_C_F_THOMAS", "CPM_DR_B_EKBAL": "CPM_DR_B_EKBAL", "BJP_M_B_RAJAGOPAL": "BJP_M_B_RAJAGOPAL", "BSP_MATHEWS_JOHN": "BSP_MATHEWS_JOHN", "SDPI_MANSOOR": "SDPI_MANSOOR", "SUCI_K_SADANANDAN": "SUCI_K_SADANANDAN", "IND_99_NASEER_K_M": "IND_99_NASEER_K_M", "KEC_M_DR_N_JAYARAJ": "KEC_M_DR_N_JAYARAJ", "CPI_ADV_SURESH_T_NAIR": "CPI_ADV_SURESH_T_NAIR", "BJP_RAJAMOHAN": "BJP_RAJAMOHAN", "BSP_ADV_P_K_GEETHA_KRISHNAN": "BSP_ADV_P_K_GEETHA_KRISHNAN", "KEC_M_P_C_GEORGE_PLATHOTTAM": "KEC_M_P_C_GEORGE_PLATHOTTAM", "IND_101_ADV_MOHAN_THOMAS": "IND_101_ADV_MOHAN_THOMAS", "BJP_K_M_SANTHOSHKUMAR": "BJP_K_M_SANTHOSHKUMAR", "SDPI_V_M_SULAIMAN_MOULAVI": "SDPI_V_M_SULAIMAN_MOULAVI", "BSP_P_P_JOSHY": "BSP_P_P_JOSHY", "IND_101_SIVAN": "IND_101_SIVAN", "IND_101_P_K_DIVAKARAN": "IND_101_P_K_DIVAKARAN", "IND_101_P_C_GEROGE_PONNATTU_PUTHENPURAYIL": "IND_101_P_C_GEROGE_PONNATTU_PUTHENPURAYIL", "IND_101_K_RAJAPPAN": "IND_101_K_RAJAPPAN", "SUCI_RAJU_VATTAPPARA": "SUCI_RAJU_VATTAPPARA", "IND_101_MANO_GEORGE": "IND_101_MANO_GEORGE", "IND_101_ANOOP_BHASKARAN": "IND_101_ANOOP_BHASKARAN", "IND_101_ANIL_MATHEW": "IND_101_ANIL_MATHEW", "CPM_ADV_AM_ARIFF": "CPM_ADV_AM_ARIFF", "INC_A_A_SHUKOOR": "INC_A_A_SHUKOOR", "BJP_T_SAJEEV_LAL": "BJP_T_SAJEEV_LAL", "BSP_V_LENIN": "BSP_V_LENIN", "IND_102_SURESH_BABU": "IND_102_SURESH_BABU", "SDPI_JAYAPRAKASH": "SDPI_JAYAPRAKASH", "IND_102_S_SARATH": "IND_102_S_SARATH", "IND_102_ADV_P_T_RADHAKRISHNAN": "IND_102_ADV_P_T_RADHAKRISHNAN", "CPI_P_THILOTHAMAN": "CPI_P_THILOTHAMAN", "JPSS_K_R_GOURIAMMA": "JPSS_K_R_GOURIAMMA", "BJP_ADV_P_K_BINOY": "BJP_ADV_P_K_BINOY", "BSP_K_R_RAJEEVAN": "BSP_K_R_RAJEEVAN", "IND_103_SHAJIMON": "IND_103_SHAJIMON", "CPM_DR_T_M_THOMAS_ISAAC": "CPM_DR_T_M_THOMAS_ISAAC", "INC_ADV_P_J_MATHEW": "INC_ADV_P_J_MATHEW", "BJP_KOTTARAM_UNNIKRISHNAN": "BJP_KOTTARAM_UNNIKRISHNAN", "SDPI_T_M_SAMAD": "SDPI_T_M_SAMAD", "IND_104_SEBASTIAN": "IND_104_SEBASTIAN", "BSP_C_P_THILAKAN": "BSP_C_P_THILAKAN", "CPM_G_SUDHAKARAN": "CPM_G_SUDHAKARAN", "INC_ADV_M_LIJU": "INC_ADV_M_LIJU", "BJP_P_K_VASUDEVAN": "BJP_P_K_VASUDEVAN", "SDPI_S_H_ALHADHI": "SDPI_S_H_ALHADHI", "BSP_OMANAKUTTAN": "BSP_OMANAKUTTAN", "SUCI_K_R_SASI": "SUCI_K_R_SASI", "IND_105_SIVAKUMAR": "IND_105_SIVAKUMAR", "IND_105_NAZEER_AHAMMED": "IND_105_NAZEER_AHAMMED", "NCP_THOMAS_CHANDY": "NCP_THOMAS_CHANDY", "KEC_M_DR_K_C_JOSEPH": "KEC_M_DR_K_C_JOSEPH", "BJP_K_SOMAN": "BJP_K_SOMAN", "BSP_SHIBU_VADAKKETTOM": "BSP_SHIBU_VADAKKETTOM", "SUCI_P_R_SATHEESAN": "SUCI_P_R_SATHEESAN", "IND_106_JOSEPH": "IND_106_JOSEPH", "IND_106_ASOK_KUMAR": "IND_106_ASOK_KUMAR", "INC_RAMESH_CHENNITHALA": "INC_RAMESH_CHENNITHALA", "CPI_G_KRISHNAPRASAD": "CPI_G_KRISHNAPRASAD", "BJP_ADV_AJITH_SANKAR": "BJP_ADV_AJITH_SANKAR", "IND_107_RAMESHAN": "IND_107_RAMESHAN", "BSP_SOMALAL_BABU": "BSP_SOMALAL_BABU", "IND_107_KRISHNAPRASAD": "IND_107_KRISHNAPRASAD", "SDPI_VENU": "SDPI_VENU", "SUCI_K_J_SHEELA": "SUCI_K_J_SHEELA", "IND_107_BIJU_J": "IND_107_BIJU_J", "IND_107_N_DIVAKARAN": "IND_107_N_DIVAKARAN", "CPM_C_K_SADASIVAN": "CPM_C_K_SADASIVAN", "INC_M_MURALI": "INC_M_MURALI", "BJP_ADV_T_O_NOUSHAD": "BJP_ADV_T_O_NOUSHAD", "IND_108_K_SADASIVAN": "IND_108_K_SADASIVAN", "IND_108_MURALI": "IND_108_MURALI", "BSP_AMBUJAN": "BSP_AMBUJAN", "IND_108_SHAL_MOHAN": "IND_108_SHAL_MOHAN", "IND_108_KALESH_MANIMANDIRAM": "IND_108_KALESH_MANIMANDIRAM", "CPM_R_RAJESH": "CPM_R_RAJESH", "JPSS_K_K_SHAJU": "JPSS_K_K_SHAJU", "BJP_S_GIRIJA": "BJP_S_GIRIJA", "IND_109_R_RAJEESH": "IND_109_R_RAJEESH", "BSP_SUBHASH_MANKAMKUZHY": "BSP_SUBHASH_MANKAMKUZHY", "INC_P_C_VISHNUNATH": "INC_P_C_VISHNUNATH", "CPM_ADV_C_S_SUJATHA": "CPM_ADV_C_S_SUJATHA", "BJP_B_RADHAKRISHNA_MENON": "BJP_B_RADHAKRISHNA_MENON", "IND_110_SURENDRAN_KARIPPUZHA": "IND_110_SURENDRAN_KARIPPUZHA", "SUCI_V_VENUGOPAL": "SUCI_V_VENUGOPAL", "JD_S_ADV_MATHEW_T_THOMAS": "JD_S_ADV_MATHEW_T_THOMAS", "KEC_M_VICTOR_T_THOMAS": "KEC_M_VICTOR_T_THOMAS", "BJP_RAJAN_MOOLAVEETTIL": "BJP_RAJAN_MOOLAVEETTIL", "BSP_ADV_KURIAN_JOSEPH": "BSP_ADV_KURIAN_JOSEPH", "SUCI_RADHAMANI_S": "SUCI_RADHAMANI_S", "IND_111_KATHIKAN_NIRANAM_RAJAN": "IND_111_KATHIKAN_NIRANAM_RAJAN", "IND_111_ADV_P_K_SUKUMARAN": "IND_111_ADV_P_K_SUKUMARAN", "SDPI_SAM_KUTTY_JACOB": "SDPI_SAM_KUTTY_JACOB", "CPM_RAJU_ABRHAM": "CPM_RAJU_ABRHAM", "INC_PEELIPOSE_THOMAS": "INC_PEELIPOSE_THOMAS", "BJP_SURESH_KADAMBARI": "BJP_SURESH_KADAMBARI", "BSP_V_D_SAJI_MON": "BSP_V_D_SAJI_MON", "SDPI_ADV_IBRAHIM_KUTTTY": "SDPI_ADV_IBRAHIM_KUTTTY", "IND_112_S_RADHAKRISHNAN": "IND_112_S_RADHAKRISHNAN", "IND_112_ULAKAN_THEVAN": "IND_112_ULAKAN_THEVAN", "INC_ADV_K_SIVADASAN_NAIR": "INC_ADV_K_SIVADASAN_NAIR", "CPM_K_C_RAJAGOPALAN": "CPM_K_C_RAJAGOPALAN", "BJP_ADV_K_HARIDAS": "BJP_ADV_K_HARIDAS", "BSP_AMRUTHAKUMAR_T": "BSP_AMRUTHAKUMAR_T", "SDPI_NAZURUDHEEN": "SDPI_NAZURUDHEEN", "IND_113_SUGATHAN_R": "IND_113_SUGATHAN_R", "IND_113_D_SIVADASAN_ACHARI": "IND_113_D_SIVADASAN_ACHARI", "IND_113_MADHU_G": "IND_113_MADHU_G", "SLAP_ADV_K_V_VARGHESE": "SLAP_ADV_K_V_VARGHESE", "IND_113_PUSHPANGADAN": "IND_113_PUSHPANGADAN", "INC_ADV_ADOOR_PRAKASH": "INC_ADV_ADOOR_PRAKASH", "CPM_M_S_RAJENDRAN": "CPM_M_S_RAJENDRAN", "BJP_V_S_HARISH_CHANDRAN": "BJP_V_S_HARISH_CHANDRAN", "IND_114_SINTO_STEPHEN": "IND_114_SINTO_STEPHEN", "IND_114_THATTAYIL_SARASWATHI": "IND_114_THATTAYIL_SARASWATHI", "SUCI_LEKSHMI_R_SEKHAR": "SUCI_LEKSHMI_R_SEKHAR", "IND_114_RENJINI_C_T": "IND_114_RENJINI_C_T", "CPI_CHITTAYAM_GOPAKUMAR": "CPI_CHITTAYAM_GOPAKUMAR", "INC_PANDALAM_SUDHAKARAN": "INC_PANDALAM_SUDHAKARAN", "BJP_K_K_SASI": "BJP_K_K_SASI", "IND_115_OLIKKULANGARA_SURENDRAN": "IND_115_OLIKKULANGARA_SURENDRAN", "BSP_KODUMON_RAMACHANDRAN": "BSP_KODUMON_RAMACHANDRAN", "IND_115_PIRAVANTHOOR_SREEDHARAN": "IND_115_PIRAVANTHOOR_SREEDHARAN", "IND_115_REMANAN": "IND_115_REMANAN", "IND_115_ANIL_K": "IND_115_ANIL_K", "CPI_C_DIVAKARAN": "CPI_C_DIVAKARAN", "JPSS_ADV_A_N_RAJANBABU": "JPSS_ADV_A_N_RAJANBABU", "SDPI_NAZARUDHEEN_ELAMARAM": "SDPI_NAZARUDHEEN_ELAMARAM", "BJP_MALUMEL_SURESH": "BJP_MALUMEL_SURESH", "IND_116_P_D_SUDHEER": "IND_116_P_D_SUDHEER", "SUCI_TWINKLE_PRABHAKARAN": "SUCI_TWINKLE_PRABHAKARAN", "KRSP_SHIBU_BABY_JOHN": "KRSP_SHIBU_BABY_JOHN", "RSP_N_K_PREMACHANDRAN": "RSP_N_K_PREMACHANDRAN", "BJP_NALINI_SANKARAMANGALAM": "BJP_NALINI_SANKARAMANGALAM", "IND_117_MANIYAN_G": "IND_117_MANIYAN_G", "BSP_V_VARADHARAJAN": "BSP_V_VARADHARAJAN", "RSP_KOVOOR_KUNJUMON": "RSP_KOVOOR_KUNJUMON", "INC_P_K_RAVI": "INC_P_K_RAVI", "BJP_RAJI_PRASAD": "BJP_RAJI_PRASAD", "SDPI_THULASEEDHARAN_PALLIKKAL": "SDPI_THULASEEDHARAN_PALLIKKAL", "IND_118_ADV_VALLIKUNNAM_PRASAD": "IND_118_ADV_VALLIKUNNAM_PRASAD", "BSP_PULIKUZHY_BALACHANDRAN": "BSP_PULIKUZHY_BALACHANDRAN", "IND_118_SHYLAJA_P": "IND_118_SHYLAJA_P", "IND_118_RAVI": "IND_118_RAVI", "IND_118_V_REMADEVI": "IND_118_V_REMADEVI", "CPM_ADV_P_AISHA_POTTY": "CPM_ADV_P_AISHA_POTTY", "KEC_B_DR_N_N_MURALI": "KEC_B_DR_N_N_MURALI", "BJP_VAYAKKAL_MADHU": "BJP_VAYAKKAL_MADHU", "IND_119_DHANESHLAL_PANAVELY": "IND_119_DHANESHLAL_PANAVELY", "BSP_P_T_PRASANNA_KUMAR": "BSP_P_T_PRASANNA_KUMAR", "IND_119_S_SOLOMON": "IND_119_S_SOLOMON", "IND_119_PRAKASH_V": "IND_119_PRAKASH_V", "IND_119_PRAKASH_R": "IND_119_PRAKASH_R", "KEC_B_K_B_GANESH_KUMAR": "KEC_B_K_B_GANESH_KUMAR", "CPM_K_RAJAGOPAL": "CPM_K_RAJAGOPAL", "BJP_R_SUBHASH_PATTAZHY": "BJP_R_SUBHASH_PATTAZHY", "IND_120_ANEESH_ANTONY": "IND_120_ANEESH_ANTONY", "BSP_PUNALUR_SALIM": "BSP_PUNALUR_SALIM", "IND_120_N_SUNILKUMAR": "IND_120_N_SUNILKUMAR", "CPI_ADV_K_RAJU": "CPI_ADV_K_RAJU", "INC_ADV_JOHNSON_ABRAHAM": "INC_ADV_JOHNSON_ABRAHAM", "BJP_B_RADHAMANI": "BJP_B_RADHAMANI", "IND_121_S_JAYAKUMAR": "IND_121_S_JAYAKUMAR", "BSP_KUZHICHAYIL_SUNIL": "BSP_KUZHICHAYIL_SUNIL", "SUCI_S_SHAILAJA": "SUCI_S_SHAILAJA", "CPI_MULLAKKARA_RATNAKARAN": "CPI_MULLAKKARA_RATNAKARAN", "INC_SHAHIDA_KAMAL": "INC_SHAHIDA_KAMAL", "BJP_T_C_SAJU_KUMAR": "BJP_T_C_SAJU_KUMAR", "SDPI_JALEEL_KADAKKAL": "SDPI_JALEEL_KADAKKAL", "IND_122_SHIBU_K_CHADAYAMANGALAM": "IND_122_SHIBU_K_CHADAYAMANGALAM", "BSP_KOOTTUKKAL_PRASAD": "BSP_KOOTTUKKAL_PRASAD", "IND_122_OYOOR_NAZEER": "IND_122_OYOOR_NAZEER", "CPM_M_A_BABY": "CPM_M_A_BABY", "INC_ADV_P_JERMIAS": "INC_ADV_P_JERMIAS", "BJP_VELLIMON_DILEEP": "BJP_VELLIMON_DILEEP", "IND_123_SANDHYA_PALLIMON": "IND_123_SANDHYA_PALLIMON", "BSP_SUSEELA_MOHAN": "BSP_SUSEELA_MOHAN", "SUCI_ANTONY_VINCENT": "SUCI_ANTONY_VINCENT", "CPM_P_K_GURUDASAN": "CPM_P_K_GURUDASAN", "INC_K_C_RAJAN": "INC_K_C_RAJAN", "BJP_G_HARI": "BJP_G_HARI", "SDPI_A_A_SHAFI": "SDPI_A_A_SHAFI", "BSP_MANGAD_THULASEEDHARAN": "BSP_MANGAD_THULASEEDHARAN", "IND_124_SANU_K": "IND_124_SANU_K", "IND_124_C_N_NARAYANAN_NAIR": "IND_124_C_N_NARAYANAN_NAIR", "IND_124_V_MOHANAN": "IND_124_V_MOHANAN", "RSP_A_A_AZEEZ": "RSP_A_A_AZEEZ", "MUL_P_K_K_BAVA": "MUL_P_K_K_BAVA", "BJP_PATTATHANAM_BABU": "BJP_PATTATHANAM_BABU", "IND_125_MYLAKKAD_SHAH": "IND_125_MYLAKKAD_SHAH", "BSP_SUSHAMA_VIJAYAN": "BSP_SUSHAMA_VIJAYAN", "IND_125_ABDUL_AZEEZ": "IND_125_ABDUL_AZEEZ", "IND_125_SAIJU_V": "IND_125_SAIJU_V", "IND_125_DEEPU_N": "IND_125_DEEPU_N", "CPI_G_S_JAYALAL": "CPI_G_S_JAYALAL", "INC_ADV_BINDU_KRISHNA": "INC_ADV_BINDU_KRISHNA", "BJP_ADV_KIZHAKKANELA_SUDHAKARAN": "BJP_ADV_KIZHAKKANELA_SUDHAKARAN", "IND_126_A_SASI": "IND_126_A_SASI", "IND_126_JAYALAL": "IND_126_JAYALAL", "BSP_MAILODE_SUDHAN": "BSP_MAILODE_SUDHAN", "SHS_SASIKUMAR": "SHS_SASIKUMAR", "INC_VARKALA_KAHAR": "INC_VARKALA_KAHAR", "CPM_A_A_RAHIM": "CPM_A_A_RAHIM", "BJP_ELAKAMAN_SATHEESAN": "BJP_ELAKAMAN_SATHEESAN", "IND_127_CHERUNNIYOOR_GANESH": "IND_127_CHERUNNIYOOR_GANESH", "SDPI_KUNNIL_SHAJAHAN": "SDPI_KUNNIL_SHAJAHAN", "IND_127_ANEESH_KUMAR": "IND_127_ANEESH_KUMAR", "CPM_ADVOCATE_B_SATYAN": "CPM_ADVOCATE_B_SATYAN", "INC_THANKAMONY_DIVAKARAN": "INC_THANKAMONY_DIVAKARAN", "IND_128_ATTINGAL_SURESH": "IND_128_ATTINGAL_SURESH", "BJP_DR_P_P_VAVA": "BJP_DR_P_P_VAVA", "IND_128_V_V_SELVARAJ": "IND_128_V_V_SELVARAJ", "SDPI_K_G_SOMAN": "SDPI_K_G_SOMAN", "BSP_DR_M_CHINNAMMA": "BSP_DR_M_CHINNAMMA", "IND_128_G_ANIRUDHAN": "IND_128_G_ANIRUDHAN", "CPI_V_SASI": "CPI_V_SASI", "INC_K_VIDYADHARAN": "INC_K_VIDYADHARAN", "IND_129_AYTHIYOOR_SURENDRAN": "IND_129_AYTHIYOOR_SURENDRAN", "BSP_ANIL_MANGALAPURAM": "BSP_ANIL_MANGALAPURAM", "IND_129_SAJIMON_CHELAYAM": "IND_129_SAJIMON_CHELAYAM", "LJP_ANILKUMAR_B": "LJP_ANILKUMAR_B", "INC_PALODE_RAVI": "INC_PALODE_RAVI", "CPI_ADV_P_RAMACHANDRAN_NAIR": "CPI_ADV_P_RAMACHANDRAN_NAIR", "BJP_ANJANA_K_S": "BJP_ANJANA_K_S", "IND_130_ANDOORKONAM_SULFI": "IND_130_ANDOORKONAM_SULFI", "SDPI_NOORJAHAN_A": "SDPI_NOORJAHAN_A", "BSP_IDAMMA_N": "BSP_IDAMMA_N", "IND_130_VAZHODE_RAVI": "IND_130_VAZHODE_RAVI", "IND_130_BIJU_A": "IND_130_BIJU_A", "IND_130_ANAD_G_RAMACHANDRAN_NAIR": "IND_130_ANAD_G_RAMACHANDRAN_NAIR", "IND_130_SAJI": "IND_130_SAJI", "CPM_KOLIAKODE_N_KRISHNAN_NAIR": "CPM_KOLIAKODE_N_KRISHNAN_NAIR", "INC_ADV_C_MOHANACHANDRAN": "INC_ADV_C_MOHANACHANDRAN", "BJP_KARETTE_SIVAPRASAD": "BJP_KARETTE_SIVAPRASAD", "SDPI_ADV_PIRAPPANKODE_SHAJAHAN": "SDPI_ADV_PIRAPPANKODE_SHAJAHAN", "IND_131_SELEENA_PRAKKANAM": "IND_131_SELEENA_PRAKKANAM", "BSP_SASI_R_CHERAMAN": "BSP_SASI_R_CHERAMAN", "IND_131_IRINCHAYAM_SURESH": "IND_131_IRINCHAYAM_SURESH", "IND_131_KRISHNAN_NAIR": "IND_131_KRISHNAN_NAIR", "IND_131_BHARATHANNOOR_BALAN": "IND_131_BHARATHANNOOR_BALAN", "INC_ADV_M_A_VAHEED": "INC_ADV_M_A_VAHEED", "CPM_C_AJAYAKUMAR": "CPM_C_AJAYAKUMAR", "BJP_ADV_PADMAKUMAR": "BJP_ADV_PADMAKUMAR", "IND_132_M_WAHID": "IND_132_M_WAHID", "BSP_K_BHUVANENDRAN_CHETTIAR": "BSP_K_BHUVANENDRAN_CHETTIAR", "SDPI_M_A_JALEEL": "SDPI_M_A_JALEEL", "IND_132_SUDARSHANAN_S": "IND_132_SUDARSHANAN_S", "IND_132_K_AJITHKUMAR": "IND_132_K_AJITHKUMAR", "INC_K_MURALIDHARAN": "INC_K_MURALIDHARAN", "IND_133_CHERIYAN_PHILIP": "IND_133_CHERIYAN_PHILIP", "BJP_ADV_V_V_RAJESH": "BJP_ADV_V_V_RAJESH", "BSP_KAITHAKODU_RADHAKRISHNAN": "BSP_KAITHAKODU_RADHAKRISHNAN", "IND_133_CHERIYAN_P_T": "IND_133_CHERIYAN_P_T", "IND_133_RAJAN_K": "IND_133_RAJAN_K", "KJ_G_BALAKRISHNAN_NAIR": "KJ_G_BALAKRISHNAN_NAIR", "INC_ADV_V_S_SIVAKUMAR": "INC_ADV_V_S_SIVAKUMAR", "KC_AMG_V_SURENDRAN_PILLAI": "KC_AMG_V_SURENDRAN_PILLAI", "BJP_B_K_SHEKHAR": "BJP_B_K_SHEKHAR", "SDPI_ABDU_RAZAK_A": "SDPI_ABDU_RAZAK_A", "IND_134_P_SURENDRAN_PILLAI": "IND_134_P_SURENDRAN_PILLAI", "IND_134_S_SIVAKUMAR": "IND_134_S_SIVAKUMAR", "SUCI_P_S_GOPAKUMAR": "SUCI_P_S_GOPAKUMAR", "IND_134_N_SIVAKUMAR": "IND_134_N_SIVAKUMAR", "IND_134_SUNDARAN_PILLAI": "IND_134_SUNDARAN_PILLAI", "IND_134_C_VASANTHA_KUMARI": "IND_134_C_VASANTHA_KUMARI", "IND_134_GEORGE_MANKIDIAN": "IND_134_GEORGE_MANKIDIAN", "CPM_V_SIVANKUTTY": "CPM_V_SIVANKUTTY", "BJP_O_RAJAGOPAL": "BJP_O_RAJAGOPAL", "SJD_CHARUPARA_RAVI": "SJD_CHARUPARA_RAVI", "IND_135_JAIN_WILSON": "IND_135_JAIN_WILSON", "BSP_O_MAHEEN": "BSP_O_MAHEEN", "IND_135_THIRUVALLAM_SREEKANTAN": "IND_135_THIRUVALLAM_SREEKANTAN", "DPSP_J_VIKRAMAN": "DPSP_J_VIKRAMAN", "IND_135_RAMACHANDRAN": "IND_135_RAMACHANDRAN", "INC_G_KARTHIKEYEN": "INC_G_KARTHIKEYEN", "RSP_AMBALATHARA_SREEDHARAN_NAIR": "RSP_AMBALATHARA_SREEDHARAN_NAIR", "BJP_SIVANKUTTY_C": "BJP_SIVANKUTTY_C", "BSP_A_BALAN": "BSP_A_BALAN", "IND_136_ADV_POOVATHOOR_S_RAJEEV": "IND_136_ADV_POOVATHOOR_S_RAJEEV", "IND_136_SANIL_V_O": "IND_136_SANIL_V_O", "IND_136_R_RAJAPPAN": "IND_136_R_RAJAPPAN", "IND_136_KARAKULAM_SATHYAKUMAR": "IND_136_KARAKULAM_SATHYAKUMAR", "SUCI_S_SREEKUMAR": "SUCI_S_SREEKUMAR", "IND_136_LATHA_B_VELLUMANNADI": "IND_136_LATHA_B_VELLUMANNADI", "INC_A_T_GEORGE": "INC_A_T_GEORGE", "CPM_ANAVOOR_NAGAPPAN": "CPM_ANAVOOR_NAGAPPAN", "BJP_ADV_S_SURESH": "BJP_ADV_S_SURESH", "BSP_J_SUDHAKARAN": "BSP_J_SUDHAKARAN", "IND_137_T_K_VISWAMBHARAN": "IND_137_T_K_VISWAMBHARAN", "SHS_OORUTTUKALA_ANIKUMAR": "SHS_OORUTTUKALA_ANIKUMAR", "INC_N_SAKTHAN": "INC_N_SAKTHAN", "IND_138_ADV_M_V_JAYADALI": "IND_138_ADV_M_V_JAYADALI", "BJP_P_K_KRISHNADAS": "BJP_P_K_KRISHNADAS", "BSP_VENGODE_SUNIL_KUMAR": "BSP_VENGODE_SUNIL_KUMAR", "SDPI_KATTAKKADA_RAJAN": "SDPI_KATTAKKADA_RAJAN", "IND_138_S_SUJITHRA": "IND_138_S_SUJITHRA", "IND_138_MALAYINKEEZH_RAJESH": "IND_138_MALAYINKEEZH_RAJESH", "JD_S_JAMEELA_PRAKASAM": "JD_S_JAMEELA_PRAKASAM", "INC_ADV_GEORGE_MERCIER": "INC_ADV_GEORGE_MERCIER", "BJP_VENGANOOR_SATHEESH": "BJP_VENGANOOR_SATHEESH", "IND_139_THANKA_BAI_T": "IND_139_THANKA_BAI_T", "SDPI_A_M_NIZAM": "SDPI_A_M_NIZAM", "BSP_MURALEEDHARAN": "BSP_MURALEEDHARAN", "DPSP_VAZHAMUTTOM_RAJENDRAN": "DPSP_VAZHAMUTTOM_RAJENDRAN", "CPM_R_SELVARAJ": "CPM_R_SELVARAJ", "INC_THAMPANOOR_RAVI": "INC_THAMPANOOR_RAVI", "BJP_ATHIYANNOOR_SREEKUMAR": "BJP_ATHIYANNOOR_SREEKUMAR", "BSP_KOVILLOOR_A_BABU": "BSP_KOVILLOOR_A_BABU", "IND_140_MOHANAN": "IND_140_MOHANAN", "IND_140_MANALOOR_B_VASANTHA": "IND_140_MANALOOR_B_VASANTHA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 140, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:06:45.560685", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.646, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.666, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.671, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.532, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.444, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.671, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.532, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.532, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.424, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.582, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 140}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "04a968d8115a40bb9fd2ac947f5487b6", "name": "Germany 2022 parliamentary (overnight germany_lower_saxony_2022_landtag_zweitstimmen.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://votemanager.kdo.de/20221009/<AGS>/praesentation/Open-Data-<AGS>-Landtagswahl-Wahlbezirk.csv (plus https://wahlergebnisse.region-hannover.de/20221009/<AGS>/daten/opendata/ and https://wahlergebnis.hannover-stadt.de/Wahl-2022-10-09/03241001/daten/opendata/); official totals cross-checked again", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"SPD": "SPD", "CDU": "CDU", "GR\u00dcNE": "GR\u00dcNE", "FDP": "FDP", "AfD": "AfD", "DIE LINKE.": "DIE LINKE.", "dieBasis": "dieBasis", "FREIE W\u00c4HLER": "FREIE W\u00c4HLER", "Die Humanisten Niedersachsen": "Die Humanisten Niedersachsen", "Die PARTEI": "Die PARTEI", "Gesundheitsforschung": "Gesundheitsforschung", "Tierschutzpartei": "Tierschutzpartei", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "Volt": "Volt"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8247, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1387, "cast_gt_registered": 1384}, "n_stations_flagged": 1387, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:06:16.239141", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.855, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.806, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.018, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8247}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8378a70d80ef44ceb80c8d8a940ff3fe", "name": "Germany 2022 parliamentary (overnight germany_lower_saxony_2022_landtag_erststimmen.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://votemanager.kdo.de/20221009/<AGS>/praesentation/Open-Data-<AGS>-Landtagswahl-Wahlbezirk.csv (plus https://wahlergebnisse.region-hannover.de/20221009/<AGS>/daten/opendata/ and https://wahlergebnis.hannover-stadt.de/Wahl-2022-10-09/03241001/daten/opendata/); official totals cross-checked again", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"SPD": "SPD", "CDU": "CDU", "GR\u00dcNE": "GR\u00dcNE", "FDP": "FDP", "AfD": "AfD", "DIE LINKE.": "DIE LINKE.", "dieBasis": "dieBasis", "FREIE W\u00c4HLER": "FREIE W\u00c4HLER", "\u00d6DP": "\u00d6DP", "Die Humanisten Niedersachsen": "Die Humanisten Niedersachsen", "Die PARTEI": "Die PARTEI", "Tierschutzpartei": "Tierschutzpartei", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "Volt": "Volt", "Einzelbewerber Meyer": "Einzelbewerber Meyer", "Einzelbewerberin Reese": "Einzelbewerberin Reese", "HAIE": "HAIE", "sonstige": "sonstige", "Einzelbewerber Hartmann": "Einzelbewerber Hartmann", "SGV": "SGV", "Weerda": "Weerda", "Die Friesen": "Die Friesen", "ZENTRUM": "ZENTRUM", "Einzelbewerber Walker": "Einzelbewerber Walker", "B\u00fcndnis C": "B\u00fcndnis C"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8247, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1387, "cast_gt_registered": 1384}, "n_stations_flagged": 1387, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:05:49.081518", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.855, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.806, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.018, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8247}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "337f8001d17b427fa65567816f043ac7", "name": "Germany 2021 parliamentary (overnight germany_2021_saxony_anhalt_landtag_zweitstimmen.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://wahlergebnisse.sachsen-anhalt.de/wahlen/lt21/erg/csv/LT2021_WBZ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CDU": "CDU", "AfD": "AfD", "DIE_LINKE": "DIE_LINKE", "SPD": "SPD", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "FDP": "FDP", "FREIE_WAEHLER": "FREIE_WAEHLER", "NPD": "NPD", "Tierschutzpartei": "Tierschutzpartei", "Tierschutzallianz": "Tierschutzallianz", "LKR": "LKR", "Die_PARTEI": "Die_PARTEI", "Gartenpartei": "Gartenpartei", "FBM": "FBM", "TIERSCHUTZ_hier": "TIERSCHUTZ_hier", "dieBasis": "dieBasis", "Klimaliste_ST": "Klimaliste_ST", "OEDP": "OEDP", "Die_Humanisten": "Die_Humanisten", "Gesundheitsforschung": "Gesundheitsforschung", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "WiR2020": "WiR2020"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2628, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 429, "cast_gt_registered": 429}, "n_stations_flagged": 429, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:05:38.807467", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.863, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.814, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.016, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2628}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "89096470847c4fd99bb1a08960a97753", "name": "Germany 2024 local (overnight germany_thuringia_2024_landtag_wahlbezirk_wahlkreisstimmen.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://wahlen.thueringen.de/downloads/LWInfoG12024.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"DIE LINKE": "DIE LINKE", "AfD": "AfD", "CDU": "CDU", "SPD": "SPD", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "FDP": "FDP", "TIERSCHUTZ_hier": "TIERSCHUTZ_hier", "OEDP_Familie": "OEDP_Familie", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "MLPD": "MLPD", "BUENDNIS_DEUTSCHLAND": "BUENDNIS_DEUTSCHLAND", "BSW": "BSW", "FAMILIE": "FAMILIE", "FREIE_WAEHLER": "FREIE_WAEHLER", "WerteUnion": "WerteUnion", "Einzelbewerber": "Einzelbewerber"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2998, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 488, "cast_gt_registered": 466}, "n_stations_flagged": 488, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:05:29.654630", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.825, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.778, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.567, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2998}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ad6185d2e39e45ad86a33413f38bb3aa", "name": "Germany 2024 local (overnight germany_thuringia_2024_landtag_wahlbezirk_landesstimmen.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://wahlen.thueringen.de/downloads/LWInfoG12024.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"DIE LINKE": "DIE LINKE", "AfD": "AfD", "CDU": "CDU", "SPD": "SPD", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "FDP": "FDP", "TIERSCHUTZ_hier": "TIERSCHUTZ_hier", "OEDP_Familie": "OEDP_Familie", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "MLPD": "MLPD", "BUENDNIS_DEUTSCHLAND": "BUENDNIS_DEUTSCHLAND", "BSW": "BSW", "FAMILIE": "FAMILIE", "FREIE_WAEHLER": "FREIE_WAEHLER", "WerteUnion": "WerteUnion"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2998, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 488, "cast_gt_registered": 466}, "n_stations_flagged": 488, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:05:20.687816", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.825, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.778, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.567, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2998}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fc2e4d8f7bd849fd944a8bc536e3f552", "name": "Germany 2022 parliamentary (overnight germany_schleswig_holstein_2022_landtag_erststimmen.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.statistik-nord.de/fileadmin/wahlen/sh/ltw22/ergebnis-download.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CDU": "CDU", "SPD": "SPD", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "FDP": "FDP", "AfD": "AfD", "DIE_LINKE": "DIE_LINKE", "SSW": "SSW", "FREIE_WAEHLER": "FREIE_WAEHLER", "Die_PARTEI": "Die_PARTEI", "Z": "Z", "dieBasis": "dieBasis", "Die_Humanisten": "Die_Humanisten", "Volt": "Volt", "Buendnis_C": "Buendnis_C", "FAMILIE": "FAMILIE", "LKR": "LKR", "Einzelbewerber": "Einzelbewerber"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2909, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 482, "registered_not_positive": 480}, "n_stations_flagged": 482, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:05:11.104788", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.855, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.806, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.018, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2909}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5fcca720d08d475795935e616b884d9d", "name": "Germany 2021 parliamentary (overnight germany_rlp_2021_landtag_landesstimmen.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.wahlen.rlp.de/fileadmin/wahlen.rlp.de/dokumente-wahlen/ltw/Ergebnisdateien/2021/LW2021_Endgueltiges_Ergebnis.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"SPD": "SPD", "CDU": "CDU", "AfD": "AfD", "FDP": "FDP", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "DIE_LINKE": "DIE_LINKE", "FREIE_WAEHLER": "FREIE_WAEHLER", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "OEDP": "OEDP", "Klimaliste": "Klimaliste", "Die_PARTEI": "Die_PARTEI", "Tierschutzpartei": "Tierschutzpartei", "VOLT": "VOLT"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4128, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:04:58.053437", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.863, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.814, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.016, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4128}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c47646821a7740489d0728b7238b5c78", "name": "Germany 2023 parliamentary (overnight germany_hesse_2023_landtag_erststimme.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://wahlen.hessen-ltw23.23degrees.eu/assets/Wahlergebnisse_Landtagswahl.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CDU": "CDU", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "SPD": "SPD", "AfD": "AfD", "FDP": "FDP", "DIE LINKE": "DIE LINKE", "FREIE WAEHLER": "FREIE WAEHLER", "Tierschutzpartei": "Tierschutzpartei", "Die PARTEI": "Die PARTEI", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "OEDP": "OEDP", "Verjuengungsforschung": "Verjuengungsforschung", "V-Partei3": "V-Partei3", "PdH": "PdH", "ABG": "ABG", "APPD": "APPD", "dieBasis": "dieBasis", "DKP": "DKP", "DIE NEUE MITTE": "DIE NEUE MITTE", "Volt": "Volt", "KLIMALISTE WAEHLERLISTE": "KLIMALISTE WAEHLERLISTE", "Buendnis C": "Buendnis C", "WDMR": "WDMR", "BUNDESPARTEI KLIMALISTE": "BUNDESPARTEI KLIMALISTE", "MERA25": "MERA25", "NEV": "NEV", "PP": "PP", "SGV": "SGV", "Solibew": "Solibew"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6954, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1946, "cast_gt_registered": 1881}, "n_stations_flagged": 1946, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:04:34.826337", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.855, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.812, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.015, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.015, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6954}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8936b4931b434626b82073859ea98494", "name": "Germany 2018 parliamentary (overnight germany_2018_bayern_landtag_zweitstimmen.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.statistik.bayern.de/mam/wahlen/landtagswahlen/ergebnisse/ltw_2018_stimmbezirksergebnisse.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CSU": "CSU", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "FREIE WAEHLER": "FREIE WAEHLER", "AfD": "AfD", "SPD": "SPD", "FDP": "FDP", "DIE LINKE": "DIE LINKE", "BP": "BP", "OEDP": "OEDP", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "FRANKEN": "FRANKEN", "LKR": "LKR", "mut": "mut", "Humanisten": "Humanisten", "Die PARTEI": "Die PARTEI", "Gesundheitsforschung": "Gesundheitsforschung", "Tierschutzpartei": "Tierschutzpartei", "V-Partei3": "V-Partei3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18055, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 382, "registered_not_positive": 5698, "cast_gt_registered": 5698}, "n_stations_flagged": 6078, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:03:37.495088", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.881, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.95, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.881, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.834, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.779, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.013, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.013, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18055}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d2a79df21f06400a8ad65555bd41bcf1", "name": "Germany 2018 parliamentary (overnight germany_2018_bayern_landtag_erststimmen.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.statistik.bayern.de/mam/wahlen/landtagswahlen/ergebnisse/ltw_2018_stimmbezirksergebnisse.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CSU": "CSU", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "FREIE WAEHLER": "FREIE WAEHLER", "AfD": "AfD", "SPD": "SPD", "FDP": "FDP", "DIE LINKE": "DIE LINKE", "BP": "BP", "OEDP": "OEDP", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "FRANKEN": "FRANKEN", "LKR": "LKR", "mut": "mut", "Humanisten": "Humanisten", "Die PARTEI": "Die PARTEI", "Gesundheitsforschung": "Gesundheitsforschung", "Tierschutzpartei": "Tierschutzpartei", "V-Partei3": "V-Partei3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18055, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 292, "registered_not_positive": 5698, "cast_gt_registered": 5698}, "n_stations_flagged": 5989, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:02:39.514072", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.881, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.95, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.881, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.834, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.779, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.013, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.013, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18055}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7e9d0c87174941d0a099687849134e55", "name": "Switzerland 2025 referendum (overnight switzerland_2025_referendum_20251130_social_climate_policy_future_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2025, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20251130-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:02:31.526820", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.843, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.02, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a1ddc869d7ce40b4ba4b2e43dbd1ac44", "name": "Switzerland 2025 referendum (overnight switzerland_2025_referendum_20251130_service_citoyen_civic_duty_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2025, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20251130-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:02:25.244586", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.843, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.02, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e2dc7330ab304d2ba17fda42d8eba0dc", "name": "Switzerland 2025 referendum (overnight switzerland_2025_referendum_20250928_e_id_act.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2025, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20250928-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:02:18.709177", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.843, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.02, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8cc49bcb6af8404baa7030dd855caacd", "name": "Switzerland 2025 referendum (overnight switzerland_2025_referendum_20250928_cantonal_property_tax_second_homes.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2025, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20250928-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:02:11.787086", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.843, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.02, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ace756d4d74d45ac817256945a0698f8", "name": "Switzerland 2025 referendum (overnight switzerland_2025_referendum_20250209_environmental_responsibility_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2025, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20250209-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:02:04.698208", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.843, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.02, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "402e2b8165c64a38b182c6ed2e9b1c80", "name": "Switzerland 2013 referendum (overnight switzerland_2013_referendum_20131124_one_to_twelve_fair_wages_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2013, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20131124-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2119, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:01:57.782991", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2119}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "58b23833de92493ba1e2c5527ffaaf2a", "name": "Switzerland 2013 referendum (overnight switzerland_2013_referendum_20131124_motorway_vignette_road_charge_act.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2013, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20131124-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2119, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:01:51.344452", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2119}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7d8a525966944d11b5e98dc28d9693da", "name": "Switzerland 2013 referendum (overnight switzerland_2013_referendum_20131124_family_initiative_tax_deduction.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2013, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20131124-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2119, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:01:44.356178", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2119}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6ce8b275306344f2af525fca0d598b87", "name": "Switzerland 2013 referendum (overnight switzerland_2013_referendum_20130922_shop_opening_hours_employment_act.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2013, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20130922-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2114, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:01:37.376633", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2114}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d9a05f8cc03a4dd496d468f93a4a5fb9", "name": "Switzerland 2013 referendum (overnight switzerland_2013_referendum_20130922_epidemics_act.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2013, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20130922-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2114, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:01:30.656324", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2114}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "31259ea818ab46d3a6185d28866debac", "name": "Switzerland 2013 referendum (overnight switzerland_2013_referendum_20130922_abolition_of_conscription_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2013, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20130922-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2114, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:01:24.030759", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2114}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "eb2796a21a794a70a41b5b3099202cd3", "name": "Switzerland 2013 referendum (overnight switzerland_2013_referendum_20130609_popular_election_of_the_federal_council_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2013, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20130609-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2119, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:01:17.435648", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2119}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "931d3e4ae4504511831365c1434dffdf", "name": "Switzerland 2013 referendum (overnight switzerland_2013_referendum_20130609_asylum_act_urgent_amendments.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2013, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20130609-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2119, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:01:10.421315", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2119}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6b96d7423b95458abbbe740622d5a557", "name": "Switzerland 2013 referendum (overnight switzerland_2013_referendum_20130303_spatial_planning_act.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2013, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20130303-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2114, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:01:03.728049", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2114}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "12d35217d0ca4bc987bac008cb72e132", "name": "Switzerland 2013 referendum (overnight switzerland_2013_referendum_20130303_family_policy_article.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2013, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20130303-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2114, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:00:57.071262", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2114}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "985e5fcf23964a9f849e45f8638bd5a7", "name": "Switzerland 2013 referendum (overnight switzerland_2013_referendum_20130303_abzockerei_executive_pay_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2013, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20130303-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2114, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:00:50.136066", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2114}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e76caf0fbb8448468d842ef45a8cd6eb", "name": "Switzerland 2012 referendum (overnight switzerland_2012_referendum_20121125_epizootic_diseases_act.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2012, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20121125-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2114, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:00:42.935784", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.862, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2114}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c3d5d6fe4ecf4ebf80dc41576bfc9a7b", "name": "Switzerland 2012 referendum (overnight switzerland_2012_referendum_20120923_youth_music_education.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2012, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20120923-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2119, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:00:36.354158", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.862, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2119}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2c590a5087e94da9b8c831fcc721a1e1", "name": "Switzerland 2012 referendum (overnight switzerland_2012_referendum_20120923_safe_living_in_old_age_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2012, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20120923-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2119, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:00:29.869649", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.862, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2119}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "aa93bd41eec34ef9a13c0aaeca817f26", "name": "Switzerland 2012 referendum (overnight switzerland_2012_referendum_20120923_protection_from_passive_smoking_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2012, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20120923-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2119, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:00:23.460703", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.862, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2119}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4537ac8dedc749cf96191d5541a56e09", "name": "Switzerland 2012 referendum (overnight switzerland_2012_referendum_20120617_treaties_before_the_people_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2012, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20120617-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2118, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:00:16.719088", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.862, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2118}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "826309a334ed4bb982be048328ebed5f", "name": "Switzerland 2012 referendum (overnight switzerland_2012_referendum_20120617_home_ownership_building_savings_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2012, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20120617-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2118, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:00:09.934320", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.862, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2118}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3008e2c235a848cca0ba1a7c7320897a", "name": "Switzerland 2012 referendum (overnight switzerland_2012_referendum_20120617_health_insurance_managed_care.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2012, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20120617-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2118, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T09:00:03.347613", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.862, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2118}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cbe9d74b514e42f8a2034f32b5bc2eba", "name": "Switzerland 2012 referendum (overnight switzerland_2012_referendum_20120311_six_weeks_holiday_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2012, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20120311-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2113, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T08:59:56.585460", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.862, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2113}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "18bec3a9b8384698be09555d8067fa28", "name": "Switzerland 2012 referendum (overnight switzerland_2012_referendum_20120311_second_homes_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2012, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20120311-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2113, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T08:59:50.038255", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.862, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2113}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5db6f7b55d7549aebe98aa9a8b7bccb7", "name": "Switzerland 2012 referendum (overnight switzerland_2012_referendum_20120311_home_purchase_savings_tax_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2012, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20120311-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2113, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T08:59:42.931822", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.862, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2113}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1649437524264fd295760cc2632c003c", "name": "Switzerland 2012 referendum (overnight switzerland_2012_referendum_20120311_gambling_for_charitable_purposes.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2012, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20120311-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2113, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T08:59:36.251885", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.862, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2113}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2ba6f939944145cba52784e4ac57af68", "name": "Switzerland 2012 referendum (overnight switzerland_2012_referendum_20120311_book_price_fixing_act.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2012, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20120311-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2113, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T08:59:29.888541", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.862, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2113}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9f64e3e477da4724a1bfda3ad3d362a2", "name": "Switzerland 2011 referendum (overnight switzerland_2011_referendum_20110213_weapons_initiative_protection_against_armed_violence.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2011, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20110213-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2112, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T08:59:23.734086", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.897, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.852, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2112}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3c5cfbc1903d4062879ad5c4aaff91e5", "name": "Switzerland 2010 referendum (overnight switzerland_2010_referendum_20101128_fair_taxes_stop_tax_competition_abuse_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2010, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20101128-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2112, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T08:59:17.415258", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.849, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.895, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.85, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.435, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.157, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.039, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2112}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "78091c8142d0440b96d85b8b05d0fd84", "name": "Switzerland 2010 referendum (overnight switzerland_2010_referendum_20101128_deportation_initiative_vs_counter_proposal_stichfrage.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2010, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20101128-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2112, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T08:59:10.701298", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.849, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.895, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.85, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.435, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.157, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.039, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2112}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2da8af182bd24de2bec7e0b425206a2a", "name": "Switzerland 2010 referendum (overnight switzerland_2010_referendum_20101128_deportation_initiative_criminal_foreigners.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2010, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20101128-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2112, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T08:59:04.396098", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.849, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.895, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.85, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.435, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.157, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.039, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2112}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "efaaea4a9b9b4df4bb6021f12cbb4627", "name": "Switzerland 2010 referendum (overnight switzerland_2010_referendum_20101128_deportation_counter_proposal_federal_decree.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2010, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20101128-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2112, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T08:58:58.172258", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.849, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.895, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.85, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.435, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.157, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.039, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2112}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3a4e828966d64b61aea2d5e641dd0649", "name": "Switzerland 2010 referendum (overnight switzerland_2010_referendum_20100926_unemployment_insurance_act_avig_revision.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2010, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20100926-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T08:58:51.322447", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.849, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.895, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.85, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.435, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.157, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.039, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fc3ec3a0b944430bbbcca254fe05e951", "name": "Switzerland 2010 referendum (overnight switzerland_2010_referendum_20100307_constitutional_article_on_human_research.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2010, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20100307-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2116, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T08:58:44.862384", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.849, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.895, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.85, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.435, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.157, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.039, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2116}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "978dc113fbf445dfbee2f056f3422f58", "name": "Switzerland 2010 referendum (overnight switzerland_2010_referendum_20100307_bvg_occupational_pension_minimum_conversion_rate_act.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2010, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20100307-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2116, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T08:58:38.236952", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.849, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.895, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.85, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.435, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.157, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.039, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2116}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f9d01d7e17b04fb3a01428c6a4e93c89", "name": "Switzerland 2010 referendum (overnight switzerland_2010_referendum_20100307_animal_welfare_lawyer_against_animal_cruelty_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2010, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20100307-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2116, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T08:58:32.066563", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.849, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.895, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.85, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.435, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.157, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.039, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2116}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "24daedc5dd32408d922617a39e22e8ec", "name": "Germany 2021 parliamentary (overnight germany_rlp_2021_landtag.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.wahlen.rlp.de/fileadmin/wahlen.rlp.de/dokumente-wahlen/ltw/Ergebnisdateien/2021/LW2021_Endgueltiges_Ergebnis.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"SPD": "SPD", "CDU": "CDU", "AfD": "AfD", "FDP": "FDP", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "DIE_LINKE": "DIE_LINKE", "FREIE_WAEHLER": "FREIE_WAEHLER", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "OEDP": "OEDP", "Klimaliste": "Klimaliste", "Die_PARTEI": "Die_PARTEI", "VOLT": "VOLT", "Basisdemokratie": "Basisdemokratie", "Dr_Moritz": "Dr_Moritz", "SIGGI_waehlen": "SIGGI_waehlen"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4128, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-25T08:58:20.309311", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.863, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.814, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.016, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4128}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7b728cf7387840ca8246c808daef3cda", "name": "Germany 2022 parliamentary (overnight germany_schleswig_holstein_2022_landtag.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.statistik-nord.de/fileadmin/wahlen/sh/ltw22/ergebnis-download.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CDU": "CDU", "SPD": "SPD", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "FDP": "FDP", "AfD": "AfD", "DIE_LINKE": "DIE_LINKE", "SSW": "SSW", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "FREIE_WAEHLER": "FREIE_WAEHLER", "Die_PARTEI": "Die_PARTEI", "Z": "Z", "dieBasis": "dieBasis", "Die_Humanisten": "Die_Humanisten", "Gesundheitsforschung": "Gesundheitsforschung", "Tierschutzpartei": "Tierschutzpartei", "Volt": "Volt"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2909, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 480, "cast_gt_registered": 482}, "n_stations_flagged": 482, "created_at": "2026-08-25T08:58:11.273998", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.855, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.806, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.018, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2909}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "08fb9c1ca3924407ae824f4f7e56810c", "name": "Germany 2021 parliamentary (overnight germany_baden_wuerttemberg_2021_landtag.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.statistik-bw.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Grafiken/200_Staat_Gesellschaft/240_Wahlen/242_Landtagswahl/LTW21_Bezirke.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"GRUENE": "GRUENE", "CDU": "CDU", "AfD": "AfD", "SPD": "SPD", "FDP": "FDP", "DIE LINKE": "DIE LINKE", "OEDP": "OEDP", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "Die PARTEI": "Die PARTEI", "FREIE WAEHLER": "FREIE WAEHLER", "MENSCHLICHE WELT": "MENSCHLICHE WELT", "Buendnis C": "Buendnis C", "DKP": "DKP", "dieBasis": "dieBasis", "DiB": "DiB", "Eine fuer Alle": "Eine fuer Alle", "KlimalisteBW": "KlimalisteBW", "Die Humanisten": "Die Humanisten", "Gesundheitsforschung": "Gesundheitsforschung", "W2020": "W2020", "Volt": "Volt", "Einzelbewerber": "Einzelbewerber"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10905, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 3455, "registered_not_positive": 3458}, "n_stations_flagged": 3458, "created_at": "2026-08-25T08:56:57.680843", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.863, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.814, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.016, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10905}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2b83db26405b43508f51a490eb8295d2", "name": "Germany 2023 parliamentary (overnight germany_hesse_2023_landtag_zweitstimme.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://wahlen.hessen-ltw23.23degrees.eu/assets/Wahlergebnisse_Landtagswahl.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CDU": "CDU", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "SPD": "SPD", "AfD": "AfD", "FDP": "FDP", "DIE LINKE": "DIE LINKE", "FREIE WAEHLER": "FREIE WAEHLER", "Tierschutzpartei": "Tierschutzpartei", "Die PARTEI": "Die PARTEI", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "OEDP": "OEDP", "Verjuengungsforschung": "Verjuengungsforschung", "V-Partei3": "V-Partei3", "PdH": "PdH", "ABG": "ABG", "APPD": "APPD", "dieBasis": "dieBasis", "DKP": "DKP", "DIE NEUE MITTE": "DIE NEUE MITTE", "Volt": "Volt", "KLIMALISTE WAEHLERLISTE": "KLIMALISTE WAEHLERLISTE", "Buendnis C": "Buendnis C", "WDMR": "WDMR", "BUNDESPARTEI KLIMALISTE": "BUNDESPARTEI KLIMALISTE", "MERA25": "MERA25", "NEV": "NEV", "PP": "PP", "SGV": "SGV", "Solibew": "Solibew"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6954, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1946, "cast_gt_registered": 1881}, "n_stations_flagged": 1946, "created_at": "2026-08-25T08:56:36.001804", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.855, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.812, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.015, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.015, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6954}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f2112152fbf345aaad750edc0ba93d72", "name": "Austria 2019 parliamentary (overnight austria_2019_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Austria", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.data.gv.at/datasets/8becadda-124e-43f3-900e-f1ab685574e5 (BMI \"Ergebnisse der Nationalratswahl 2019\", file wahl_20191007_163653.csv, CC-BY-4.0)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u00d6VP": "\u00d6VP", "SP\u00d6": "SP\u00d6", "FP\u00d6": "FP\u00d6", "NEOS": "NEOS", "JETZT": "JETZT", "GR\u00dcNE": "GR\u00dcNE", "KP\u00d6": "KP\u00d6", "WANDL": "WANDL", "BZ\u00d6": "BZ\u00d6", "BIER": "BIER", "CP\u00d6": "CP\u00d6", "GILT": "GILT", "SLP": "SLP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2282, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 160, "registered_not_positive": 164}, "n_stations_flagged": 164, "created_at": "2026-08-23T21:01:41.578164", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.881, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.862, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.793, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.325, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.074, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.074, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2282}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "061d9581f7384ccbbf59e1dcd3f15bb4", "name": "Austria 2017 parliamentary (overnight austria_2017_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Austria", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.data.gv.at/datasets/3179c5b2-9bb5-4a7f-a573-5491ccb0110b (BMI \"Ergebnisse der Nationalratswahl 2017\", file wahl_20171031_154920.csv \"Endergebnis inkl. Wahlkarten\", CC-BY-4.0)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"SP\u00d6": "SP\u00d6", "\u00d6VP": "\u00d6VP", "FP\u00d6": "FP\u00d6", "GR\u00dcNE": "GR\u00dcNE", "NEOS": "NEOS", "PILZ": "PILZ", "GILT": "GILT", "FL\u00d6": "FL\u00d6", "KP\u00d6": "KP\u00d6", "WEI\u00dfE": "WEI\u00dfE", "SLP": "SLP", "EUAUS": "EUAUS", "M": "M", "CP\u00d6": "CP\u00d6", "NBZ": "NBZ", "ODP": "ODP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2286, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 161, "registered_not_positive": 164}, "n_stations_flagged": 164, "created_at": "2026-08-23T21:01:35.682966", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.855, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.908, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.851, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.782, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.911, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.29, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.049, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.049, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2286}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6762cb625fc944f09faa4b2a3e75208b", "name": "Austria 2013 parliamentary (overnight austria_2013_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Austria", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.data.gv.at/datasets/09716341-2bea-4298-9525-e936d8247d19 (BMI \"Ergebnisse der Nationalratswahl 2013\", file nrw2013-wahlergebnisse-nach-gemeindekennzahl-geordnet_16102013-1525.csv, amtliches Endergebnis, CC-BY-4.0)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"SP\u00d6": "SP\u00d6", "\u00d6VP": "\u00d6VP", "FP\u00d6": "FP\u00d6", "BZ\u00d6": "BZ\u00d6", "GR\u00dcNE": "GR\u00dcNE", "FRANK": "FRANK", "NEOS": "NEOS", "KP\u00d6": "KP\u00d6", "PIRAT": "PIRAT", "CP\u00d6": "CP\u00d6", "WANDL": "WANDL", "M": "M", "EUAUS": "EUAUS", "SLP": "SLP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2541, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 163, "registered_not_positive": 165}, "n_stations_flagged": 165, "created_at": "2026-08-23T21:01:29.485992", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.848, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.9, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.875, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.807, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.9, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.807, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.043, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2541}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d58e5065d6ea417c9ac4c65460c70943", "name": "Italy 2020 referendum (overnight italy_2020_referendum_20200920_parliament_size_reduction.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2020, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://elezionistorico.interno.gov.it/daithome/documenti/opendata/referendum/referendum-20200920.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"si": "si", "no": "no"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7903, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T21:01:09.734744", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.904, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.963, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.857, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.774, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.621, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.796, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.164, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.164, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7903}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2dd3252c474946f9b7d1a15121501fbb", "name": "Italy 2016 referendum (overnight italy_2016_referendum_20161204_renzi_constitutional_reform.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2016, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://elezionistorico.interno.gov.it/daithome/documenti/opendata/referendum/referendum-20161204.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"si": "si", "no": "no"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7998, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T21:00:50.040917", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.891, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.963, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.869, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.791, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.563, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.694, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.044, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.511, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.791, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.194, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.194, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7998}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0bb14f18e0874a8499b1cb39b766bbad", "name": "Italy 2016 referendum (overnight italy_2016_referendum_20160417_offshore_drilling_concessions.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2016, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://elezionistorico.interno.gov.it/daithome/documenti/opendata/referendum/referendum-20160417.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"si": "si", "no": "no"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8000, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T21:00:29.626339", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.891, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.963, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.869, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.791, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.563, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.694, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.044, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.511, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.791, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.194, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.194, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8000}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "44ad6d4bdf234840b7d9126daf1254cf", "name": "New Zealand 2020 referendum (overnight newzealand_2020_referendum_end_of_life_choice.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "New Zealand", "year": 2020, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionresults.govt.nz/electionresults_2020/referendums-statistics/ElectorateReferendumResults.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"yes": "yes", "no": "no"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 137, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 137, "registered_not_positive": 137}, "n_stations_flagged": 137, "created_at": "2026-08-23T21:00:28.726982", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.863, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.933, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.826, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.777, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.742, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.475, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.009, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.009, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 137}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "78276ed54e23459c8e5260f8a80c7c22", "name": "New Zealand 2020 referendum (overnight newzealand_2020_referendum_cannabis.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "New Zealand", "year": 2020, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionresults.govt.nz/electionresults_2020/referendums-statistics/ElectorateReferendumResults.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"yes": "yes", "no": "no"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 137, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 137, "cast_gt_registered": 137}, "n_stations_flagged": 137, "created_at": "2026-08-23T21:00:28.278251", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.863, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.933, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.826, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.777, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.742, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.475, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.009, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.009, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 137}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a5d8e30dc7ef478caf7318dbf542d862", "name": "Ireland 2024 referendum (overnight ireland_2024_referendum_20240308_the_family.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Ireland", "year": 2024, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://assets.gov.ie/static/documents/referendum-results-1937-2024.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"yes": "yes", "no": "no"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 39, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T21:00:28.023289", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.831, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.895, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.83, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.766, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.269, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.067, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.032, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.032, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 39}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "67c9a792e8ed4992a1acf2aee776287e", "name": "Ireland 2024 referendum (overnight ireland_2024_referendum_20240308_care.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Ireland", "year": 2024, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://assets.gov.ie/static/documents/referendum-results-1937-2024.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"yes": "yes", "no": "no"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 39, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T21:00:27.797935", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.831, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.895, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.83, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.766, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.269, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.067, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.032, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.032, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 39}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c77d6e585ce24ebd8240bfb54c15b5a7", "name": "Ireland 2019 referendum (overnight ireland_2019_referendum_20190524_dissolution_of_marriage.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Ireland", "year": 2019, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://assets.gov.ie/static/documents/referendum-results-1937-2024.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"yes": "yes", "no": "no"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 31, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T21:00:27.608294", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.881, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.937, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.887, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.822, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.937, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.341, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.053, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.887, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.032, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.032, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.969, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 31}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "70228a8f56414a6eaccee22b1eeca7a0", "name": "Ireland 2018 referendum (overnight ireland_2018_referendum_20181026_blasphemy.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Ireland", "year": 2018, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://assets.gov.ie/static/documents/referendum-results-1937-2024.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"yes": "yes", "no": "no"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T21:00:27.368952", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.881, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.937, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.89, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.821, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.937, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.341, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.053, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.026, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 40}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ae59ac1bff6142aa8d57e685d2711b17", "name": "Ireland 2018 referendum (overnight ireland_2018_referendum_20180525_termination_of_pregnancy.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Ireland", "year": 2018, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://assets.gov.ie/static/documents/referendum-results-1937-2024.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"yes": "yes", "no": "no"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T21:00:27.145713", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.881, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.937, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.89, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.821, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.937, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.341, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.053, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.026, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 40}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e296341e617c4db8ae5196301369e406", "name": "Ireland 2015 referendum (overnight ireland_2015_referendum_20150522_presidential_candidate_age.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Ireland", "year": 2015, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://assets.gov.ie/static/documents/referendum-results-1937-2024.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"yes": "yes", "no": "no"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 43, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T21:00:26.925634", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.954, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.895, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.825, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.308, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.192, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.048, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 43}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7bebee42fa224b1989ef0fbd1aed6a42", "name": "Ireland 2015 referendum (overnight ireland_2015_referendum_20150522_marriage_equality.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Ireland", "year": 2015, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://assets.gov.ie/static/documents/referendum-results-1937-2024.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"yes": "yes", "no": "no"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 43, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T21:00:26.698911", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.954, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.895, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.825, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.308, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.192, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.048, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 43}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "93d9dc588a684068801d728fe9095a69", "name": "Spain 2021 local (overnight spain_catalonia_2021_parlament_per_mesa.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.gencat.cat/eleccions/resultatsparlament2021/pdf/ELECCIONS_PARLAMENT_CATALUNYA_2021_MESES.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"BLANC": "BLANC", "PSC": "PSC", "ERC": "ERC", "JxCat": "JxCat", "VOX": "VOX", "CUP-G": "CUP-G", "ECP-PEC": "ECP-PEC", "Cs": "Cs", "PP": "PP", "PDeCAT": "PDeCAT", "RECORTES CERO-GV-M": "RECORTES CERO-GV-M", "MPIC": "MPIC", "FNC": "FNC", "PNC": "PNC", "PCTC": "PCTC", "IZQP": "IZQP", "SOM TERRES DE L'EBRE": "SOM TERRES DE L'EBRE", "PUM+J": "PUM+J", "UEP": "UEP", "EB": "EB", "UNIDOS SI - DEf - PDSJE - SOMOS ESPA\u00d1A": "UNIDOS SI - DEf - PDSJE - SOMOS ESPA\u00d1A", "ALIANZA C V": "ALIANZA C V", "SCAT": "SCAT", "M.C.R.": "M.C.R."}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 9139, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:59:59.742745", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.945, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.908, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.85, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.775, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.036, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.036, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 9139}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c8146e08896a41a99d0c6c9799bcd5bb", "name": "Switzerland 2020 referendum (overnight switzerland_2020_referendum_20200927_paternity_leave_compensation_act.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2020, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20200927-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2116, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:59:53.480690", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.856, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2116}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e839b613018a468a8249401f2e682e89", "name": "Switzerland 2020 referendum (overnight switzerland_2020_referendum_20200927_new_fighter_aircraft_procurement.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2020, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20200927-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2116, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:59:48.079973", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.856, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2116}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ea2e373b94a24bd29f57c2dcb76459de", "name": "Switzerland 2020 referendum (overnight switzerland_2020_referendum_20200927_limitation_initiative_immigration.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2020, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20200927-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2116, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:59:42.220032", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.856, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2116}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d0a076867c77426187166120a7c980a5", "name": "Switzerland 2020 referendum (overnight switzerland_2020_referendum_20200927_hunting_act_amendment.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2020, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20200927-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2116, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:59:36.588543", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.856, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2116}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "802d2d3183fc4b17994c50c2cbac4180", "name": "Switzerland 2020 referendum (overnight switzerland_2020_referendum_20200927_child_deduction_direct_federal_tax.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2020, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20200927-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2116, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:59:30.802626", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.856, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2116}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "96fa69a637dd48f481725ea492cc82a1", "name": "Switzerland 2020 referendum (overnight switzerland_2020_referendum_20200209_anti_homophobia_criminal_code.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2020, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20200209-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2116, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:59:25.447007", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.856, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2116}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8bacc58a7ecd4618b612f44e7faa39ad", "name": "Switzerland 2020 referendum (overnight switzerland_2020_referendum_20200209_affordable_homes_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2020, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20200209-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2116, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:59:19.063473", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.856, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2116}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d1a49d068a344282b419ee4807707dd0", "name": "Switzerland 2019 referendum (overnight switzerland_2019_referendum_20190519_staf_tax_reform_ahv_financing.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2019, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20190519-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2121, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:59:13.346930", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.86, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2121}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5e3b301b41f84819aca4ec6813e23f16", "name": "Switzerland 2019 referendum (overnight switzerland_2019_referendum_20190519_eu_weapons_directive.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2019, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20190519-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2121, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:59:07.545477", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.86, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2121}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dcc95e9183e6419f9be8bc371d51901f", "name": "Switzerland 2019 referendum (overnight switzerland_2019_referendum_20190210_urban_sprawl_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2019, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20190210-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2121, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:59:02.090545", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.86, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2121}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7264601e1d054f958dd52aa3ff54f237", "name": "Switzerland 2018 referendum (overnight switzerland_2018_referendum_20181125_self_determination_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2018, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20181125-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2121, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:58:55.958365", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.86, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2121}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d0161cb7a95a4ee2a66a040db46de522", "name": "Switzerland 2018 referendum (overnight switzerland_2018_referendum_20181125_insurance_claimant_surveillance_act.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2018, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20181125-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2121, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:58:50.751761", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.86, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2121}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b1bde04764a24e518c569f4908b55028", "name": "Switzerland 2018 referendum (overnight switzerland_2018_referendum_20181125_horned_cow_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2018, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20181125-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2121, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:58:45.126196", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.86, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2121}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0a355a81550b4b9fa70e2d4f74ec77c7", "name": "Switzerland 2018 referendum (overnight switzerland_2018_referendum_20180923_food_sovereignty_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2018, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20180923-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2116, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:58:39.869271", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.86, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2116}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3135ca757b5243bbb1292d017d3b90f9", "name": "Switzerland 2018 referendum (overnight switzerland_2018_referendum_20180923_fair_food_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2018, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20180923-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2116, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:58:34.562196", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.86, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2116}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c1382fa6f5fd41eaafd4e447ad3fedc0", "name": "Switzerland 2018 referendum (overnight switzerland_2018_referendum_20180923_cycle_and_footpaths_counterproposal.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2018, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20180923-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2116, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:58:29.265440", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.86, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2116}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e8254e0604954cfebb03a59688785610", "name": "Switzerland 2018 referendum (overnight switzerland_2018_referendum_20180610_sovereign_money_initiative_vollgeld.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2018, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20180610-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2116, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:58:24.073008", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.86, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2116}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "07879b632d0942fab5397f73393bcaa7", "name": "Switzerland 2018 referendum (overnight switzerland_2018_referendum_20180610_gambling_act.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2018, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20180610-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2116, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:58:18.929915", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.86, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2116}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8ae19d29472b415f9772f77b98e4b0cd", "name": "Switzerland 2018 referendum (overnight switzerland_2018_referendum_20180304_no_billag_radio_tv_fee_abolition.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2018, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20180304-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2121, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:58:13.501543", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.86, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2121}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f419fa3855ce4e91a19354f6346582ea", "name": "Switzerland 2018 referendum (overnight switzerland_2018_referendum_20180304_new_financial_regime_2021.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2018, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20180304-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2121, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:58:08.171423", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.86, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2121}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "03aa604883cd4e568ef33ec61b7ac3b5", "name": "Switzerland 2017 referendum (overnight switzerland_2017_referendum_20170924_food_security.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2017, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20170924-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2115, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:58:02.492002", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.86, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2115}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "24ea97f2ebb9495bb4baee9268c1cf07", "name": "Switzerland 2017 referendum (overnight switzerland_2017_referendum_20170924_altersvorsorge_2020_pension_reform.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2017, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20170924-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2115, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:57:57.255624", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.86, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2115}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9967a9f9d1254a358679184fcf4b2273", "name": "Switzerland 2017 referendum (overnight switzerland_2017_referendum_20170924_ahv_vat_supplementary_financing.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2017, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20170924-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2115, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:57:52.104169", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.86, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2115}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3caee3d0691d4ecf9fb8e45bd5f913de", "name": "Switzerland 2017 referendum (overnight switzerland_2017_referendum_20170521_energy_act_2050.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2017, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20170521-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2115, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:57:46.538371", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.86, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2115}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "08cc8a7d71ba4ddd9d27ba44127de7f7", "name": "Switzerland 2017 referendum (overnight switzerland_2017_referendum_20170212_naf_road_and_agglomeration_traffic_fund.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2017, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20170212-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2120, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:57:41.434049", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.86, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2120}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f4f9785e08dd44d295ee1fea967038be", "name": "Switzerland 2017 referendum (overnight switzerland_2017_referendum_20170212_facilitated_naturalisation_third_generation.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2017, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20170212-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2120, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:57:36.088752", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.86, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2120}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bce5842805b04d7493b763399fe8e45c", "name": "Switzerland 2017 referendum (overnight switzerland_2017_referendum_20170212_corporate_tax_reform_iii.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2017, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20170212-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2120, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:57:31.048939", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.86, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2120}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e50d695c683a41569bff5e5dc5d66f7c", "name": "Switzerland 2016 referendum (overnight switzerland_2016_referendum_20161127_nuclear_phaseout_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2016, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20161127-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2120, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:57:25.642134", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.857, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2120}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b1d1b3084cb84823a24c9a5edf3e7acd", "name": "Switzerland 2016 referendum (overnight switzerland_2016_referendum_20160925_intelligence_service_act.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2016, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20160925-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2120, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:57:20.356256", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.857, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2120}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "70c754ac635b48ab9cee459754ec12e0", "name": "Switzerland 2016 referendum (overnight switzerland_2016_referendum_20160925_green_economy_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2016, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20160925-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2120, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:57:14.812229", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.857, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2120}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9010f3d2c0564ec1899133fec1ae8ea0", "name": "Switzerland 2016 referendum (overnight switzerland_2016_referendum_20160925_ahvplus_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2016, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20160925-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2120, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:57:09.380033", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.857, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2120}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "70bfc105474c49ccb43df7d2ca134f80", "name": "Switzerland 2016 referendum (overnight switzerland_2016_referendum_20160605_unconditional_basic_income_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2016, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20160605-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2115, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:57:03.964638", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.857, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2115}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2c283abb97c84303878b01c66b032e22", "name": "Switzerland 2016 referendum (overnight switzerland_2016_referendum_20160605_reproductive_medicine_act_pid.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2016, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20160605-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2115, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:56:58.865651", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.857, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2115}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0b8f990022bb46708d5df30572e784ad", "name": "Switzerland 2016 referendum (overnight switzerland_2016_referendum_20160605_pro_service_public_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2016, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20160605-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2115, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:56:53.296111", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.857, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2115}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a379264bdc904cd3844a4b3a4edb85e1", "name": "Switzerland 2016 referendum (overnight switzerland_2016_referendum_20160605_fair_transport_funding_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2016, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20160605-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2115, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:56:48.389001", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.857, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2115}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "622c974a69b2409495da55c0f3e91c04", "name": "Switzerland 2016 referendum (overnight switzerland_2016_referendum_20160605_asylum_act_amendment.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2016, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20160605-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2115, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:56:43.193370", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.857, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2115}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dbcba8e5d09e4c139f95f70bbbb7d930", "name": "Switzerland 2016 referendum (overnight switzerland_2016_referendum_20160228_marriage_penalty_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2016, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20160228-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2120, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:56:38.114007", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.857, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2120}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f6e45a3e50f64958aa2f71aef7bcc2d4", "name": "Switzerland 2016 referendum (overnight switzerland_2016_referendum_20160228_gotthard_road_tunnel_renovation.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2016, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20160228-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2120, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:56:33.031454", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.857, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2120}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "641387cea02e46fb8aebcb076a47f44c", "name": "Switzerland 2016 referendum (overnight switzerland_2016_referendum_20160228_food_speculation_ban_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2016, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20160228-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2120, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:56:27.990077", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.857, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2120}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d925cb07255e4f0490d54c046d199384", "name": "Switzerland 2016 referendum (overnight switzerland_2016_referendum_20160228_deportation_enforcement_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2016, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20160228-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2120, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:56:22.907828", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.857, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2120}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1331947e0c1146c18613490a800c7d26", "name": "Switzerland 2015 referendum (overnight switzerland_2015_referendum_20150614_scholarship_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2015, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20150614-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2115, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:56:17.597662", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.903, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.858, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.903, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2115}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e2289b8e1e54463ba70d7f574cd546f1", "name": "Switzerland 2015 referendum (overnight switzerland_2015_referendum_20150614_reproductive_medicine_pid_decree.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2015, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20150614-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2115, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:56:12.400394", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.903, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.858, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.903, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2115}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c614e27cbc764e719493c4d3d55d0346", "name": "Switzerland 2015 referendum (overnight switzerland_2015_referendum_20150614_radio_and_television_act_rtvg.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2015, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20150614-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2115, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:56:07.379063", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.903, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.858, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.903, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2115}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f092c8967d57450ba1be5e461c4bfe0d", "name": "Switzerland 2015 referendum (overnight switzerland_2015_referendum_20150614_inheritance_tax_reform_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2015, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20150614-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2115, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:56:01.824455", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.903, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.858, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.903, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2115}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "da4499ad4a0f4f9889d566a209b25673", "name": "Switzerland 2015 referendum (overnight switzerland_2015_referendum_20150308_tax_free_child_allowances_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2015, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20150308-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2115, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:55:56.700634", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.903, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.858, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.903, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2115}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0895c3e2da5b4c9487ed99f68189bdef", "name": "Switzerland 2015 referendum (overnight switzerland_2015_referendum_20150308_energy_tax_instead_of_vat_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2015, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20150308-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2115, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:55:51.468686", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.903, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.858, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.903, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2115}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ac0ad5225c6d482d927c0e98bfa2518b", "name": "Switzerland 2014 referendum (overnight switzerland_2014_referendum_20141130_save_our_swiss_gold_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2014, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20141130-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2120, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:55:46.284304", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2120}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7cae470e63b24e8baa7729f5f2e790d3", "name": "Switzerland 2014 referendum (overnight switzerland_2014_referendum_20141130_ecopop_stop_overpopulation_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2014, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20141130-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2120, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:55:41.132556", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2120}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d3919b07ad2b4d608c8faf757519ec02", "name": "Switzerland 2014 referendum (overnight switzerland_2014_referendum_20141130_abolition_of_lump_sum_taxation_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2014, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20141130-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2120, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:55:35.902486", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2120}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "27936d3511434612b4ae67e820411b94", "name": "Switzerland 2014 referendum (overnight switzerland_2014_referendum_20140518_paedophiles_no_work_with_children_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2014, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20140518-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2119, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:55:30.688118", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2119}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8f2527c45e2641eeaa1919f9b4d3fe2e", "name": "Switzerland 2014 referendum (overnight switzerland_2014_referendum_20140518_minimum_wage_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2014, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20140518-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2119, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:55:25.636033", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2119}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "03e8b715550d478c99c112a06ec090db", "name": "Switzerland 2014 referendum (overnight switzerland_2014_referendum_20140518_gripen_fighter_jet_fund_act.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2014, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20140518-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2119, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:55:20.674381", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2119}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "02cea04e65dc4253b1ab5bbe2d8d9017", "name": "Switzerland 2014 referendum (overnight switzerland_2014_referendum_20140518_family_doctors_basic_medical_care.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2014, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20140518-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2119, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:55:15.406278", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2119}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f7d4f46cd7d64919828c2e66de8a54da", "name": "Switzerland 2014 referendum (overnight switzerland_2014_referendum_20140209_fabi_rail_infrastructure_financing.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2014, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20140209-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2114, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:55:10.189380", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2114}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c4f81fe6c3304cc798d14ff167829133", "name": "Switzerland 2014 referendum (overnight switzerland_2014_referendum_20140209_against_mass_immigration_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2014, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20140209-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2114, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:55:04.924507", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2114}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d87a97a07bf54614a93cdb90c7f5596a", "name": "Switzerland 2014 referendum (overnight switzerland_2014_referendum_20140209_abortion_funding_private_matter_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2014, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20140209-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2114, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T20:54:59.014591", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2114}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "16339715bd6645239a6cc6317ada999c", "name": "Switzerland 2024 referendum (overnight switzerland_2024_referendum_20241124_tenancy_subletting.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2024, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20241124-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:11:03.245956", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.843, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5e46cd5272474b878cbf6042b9c072db", "name": "Switzerland 2024 referendum (overnight switzerland_2024_referendum_20241124_tenancy_personal_use.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2024, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20241124-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:10:56.673507", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.843, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6ec9ce7eac4140a098a82ec91bb9ca0c", "name": "Switzerland 2024 referendum (overnight switzerland_2024_referendum_20241124_motorway_expansion_2023.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2024, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20241124-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:10:50.375497", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.843, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2acf818469d749279de74bb618bddd64", "name": "Switzerland 2024 referendum (overnight switzerland_2024_referendum_20241124_efas_uniform_health_financing.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2024, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20241124-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:10:44.115476", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.843, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "197b50cd58f442679603079c3716b2b3", "name": "Switzerland 2024 referendum (overnight switzerland_2024_referendum_20240922_bvg_occupational_pension_reform.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2024, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20240922-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:10:37.877067", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.843, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "56623d6f34a3407cb6b9398ac73f9247", "name": "Switzerland 2024 referendum (overnight switzerland_2024_referendum_20240922_biodiversity_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2024, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20240922-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:10:31.761457", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.843, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7e6b4ed82cb440be8ad559d6b760d1b1", "name": "Switzerland 2024 referendum (overnight switzerland_2024_referendum_20240609_premium_relief_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2024, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20240609-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:10:25.485535", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.843, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bc20be1032ab43e0b3a141d6eac3a14e", "name": "Switzerland 2024 referendum (overnight switzerland_2024_referendum_20240609_freedom_bodily_integrity.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2024, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20240609-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:10:18.998986", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.843, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3cff89048f794bccbfb1af76aa3e06d2", "name": "Switzerland 2024 referendum (overnight switzerland_2024_referendum_20240609_electricity_act.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2024, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20240609-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:10:12.115465", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.843, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2142e8e1626444b48f3bd3212c66c50e", "name": "Switzerland 2024 referendum (overnight switzerland_2024_referendum_20240609_cost_brake_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2024, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20240609-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:10:05.478770", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.843, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3c61da03e4bc4286acef514a4e22e0ef", "name": "Switzerland 2024 referendum (overnight switzerland_2024_referendum_20240303_pensions_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2024, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20240303-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:09:58.605231", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.843, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4e7de02bc41c404e8a28b54e13472e48", "name": "Switzerland 2024 referendum (overnight switzerland_2024_referendum_20240303_13th_ahv_pension.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2024, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20240303-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:09:51.879582", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.843, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4255e1d5a5ca453eacd311d6b819b92e", "name": "Switzerland 2023 referendum (overnight switzerland_2023_referendum_20230618_oecd_minimum_tax.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2023, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20230618-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:09:45.132315", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.884, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.838, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.559, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fd870234dea741d0904895be5323b267", "name": "Switzerland 2023 referendum (overnight switzerland_2023_referendum_20230618_covid19_act.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2023, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20230618-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:09:38.711187", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.884, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.838, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.559, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "397da60a5d2e4e91bd65492cbdc0c0c5", "name": "Switzerland 2023 referendum (overnight switzerland_2023_referendum_20230618_climate_protection_act.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2023, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20230618-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:09:32.498879", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.884, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.838, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.559, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "eaabd7f6b0304259a80da56cd0c661d8", "name": "Switzerland 2022 referendum (overnight switzerland_2022_referendum_20220925_withholding_tax_act.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2022, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20220925-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:09:26.229532", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.848, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.02, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7ef107c022f64b90953299ad90ff7686", "name": "Switzerland 2022 referendum (overnight switzerland_2022_referendum_20220925_factory_farming_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2022, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20220925-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:09:19.665250", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.848, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.02, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dc13ed0857d44372b20b6673bc5fe26b", "name": "Switzerland 2022 referendum (overnight switzerland_2022_referendum_20220925_ahv_vat_supplementary_financing.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2022, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20220925-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:09:12.959246", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.848, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.02, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6cd40625a1c74ac99185d57639fe2721", "name": "Switzerland 2022 referendum (overnight switzerland_2022_referendum_20220925_ahv21_pension_reform.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2022, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20220925-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:09:06.206662", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.848, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.02, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c6ac4d0b158b4e4fa4ac5ba3f91cd190", "name": "Switzerland 2022 referendum (overnight switzerland_2022_referendum_20220515_transplantation_act.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2022, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20220515-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2122, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:08:59.885307", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.848, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.02, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2122}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8f1be45fff724d5bae85ccb17ef7796b", "name": "Switzerland 2022 referendum (overnight switzerland_2022_referendum_20220515_frontex_schengen.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2022, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20220515-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2122, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:08:53.033128", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.848, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.02, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2122}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a2e486fbad3c4ff5991ad2fc1a0ecc0e", "name": "Switzerland 2022 referendum (overnight switzerland_2022_referendum_20220515_film_act_lex_netflix.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2022, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20220515-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2122, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:08:46.878682", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.848, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.02, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2122}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "35e6faf7179b4105bd252048d49fa9ad", "name": "Switzerland 2022 referendum (overnight switzerland_2022_referendum_20220213_tobacco_advertising_ban.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2022, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20220213-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:08:40.721950", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.848, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.02, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c5348a72cf544912b678289e0a6e58b1", "name": "Switzerland 2022 referendum (overnight switzerland_2022_referendum_20220213_stamp_duty_abolition.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2022, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20220213-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:08:34.194769", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.848, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.02, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f39fa89f5b504bbc9d0deef1401effe1", "name": "Switzerland 2022 referendum (overnight switzerland_2022_referendum_20220213_media_support_package.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2022, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20220213-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:08:27.858456", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.848, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.02, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "786df5a718ec4100ac5977d356f7f9b7", "name": "Switzerland 2022 referendum (overnight switzerland_2022_referendum_20220213_animal_human_experiments_ban.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2022, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20220213-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:08:21.497867", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.848, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.02, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f33df170461d4f0bb3206d0d45fe22b4", "name": "Switzerland 2021 referendum (overnight switzerland_2021_referendum_20211128_nursing_care_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2021, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20211128-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:08:14.832089", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.851, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "43fe4b70809d4c62a196b177791f44a9", "name": "Switzerland 2021 referendum (overnight switzerland_2021_referendum_20211128_justice_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2021, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20211128-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:08:08.290710", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.851, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7416470714044c97bfb4be9c6d5f49c2", "name": "Switzerland 2021 referendum (overnight switzerland_2021_referendum_20211128_covid19_act_amendment.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2021, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20211128-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:08:01.680824", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.851, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ed51f72aa4c9434ba5a82c73a8f13aa1", "name": "Switzerland 2021 referendum (overnight switzerland_2021_referendum_20210926_marriage_for_all.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2021, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20210926-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:07:55.160789", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.851, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f95c39be9e384c61a83f8c72906143a5", "name": "Switzerland 2021 referendum (overnight switzerland_2021_referendum_20210926_99_percent_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2021, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20210926-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:07:48.634464", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.851, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "87d95f74cbd34ccdb4a2f6b5a7542480", "name": "Switzerland 2021 referendum (overnight switzerland_2021_referendum_20210613_synthetic_pesticides_ban_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2021, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20210613-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:07:42.286503", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.851, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "940c1ce30ede4a2986a31a9f23293309", "name": "Switzerland 2021 referendum (overnight switzerland_2021_referendum_20210613_police_counterterrorism_measures_act.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2021, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20210613-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:07:35.847531", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.851, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "07f871bd6caf47c3b36358a3d537343f", "name": "Switzerland 2021 referendum (overnight switzerland_2021_referendum_20210613_covid19_act.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2021, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20210613-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:07:29.507265", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.851, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6e1f62204b0c42eda79c91c0f72419f1", "name": "Switzerland 2021 referendum (overnight switzerland_2021_referendum_20210613_co2_act.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2021, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20210613-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:07:23.488254", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.851, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1ade3941fc9041e78dec6d1c8d79e8eb", "name": "Switzerland 2021 referendum (overnight switzerland_2021_referendum_20210613_clean_drinking_water_initiative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2021, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20210613-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:07:17.343350", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.851, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cb6afce72adb45ad8b3b908f1f68f597", "name": "Switzerland 2021 referendum (overnight switzerland_2021_referendum_20210307_indonesia_efta_trade_agreement.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2021, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20210307-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:07:10.974170", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.851, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d812343657a74cc6932ac4c6638b87f1", "name": "Switzerland 2021 referendum (overnight switzerland_2021_referendum_20210307_face_covering_ban.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2021, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20210307-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:07:04.911666", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.851, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0c37b87ed970413280c53f87b3a2e073", "name": "Switzerland 2021 referendum (overnight switzerland_2021_referendum_20210307_e_id_act.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2021, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ogd-static.voteinfo-app.ch/v1/ogd/sd-t-17-02-20210307-eidgAbstimmung.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ja": "ja", "nein": "nein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2117, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:06:59.016704", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.851, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6a61a61b254f4d1a99364a02d913281d", "name": "India 2017 local (overnight india_punjab_2017_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2017, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Punjab/Punjab_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AAAP": "AAAP", "ABSD": "ABSD", "AITC": "AITC", "APPA": "APPA", "BASD": "BASD", "BDPTY": "BDPTY", "BGTD": "BGTD", "BIRK": "BIRK", "BJP": "BJP", "BMUP": "BMUP", "BRP": "BRP", "BRPP": "BRPP", "BSP": "BSP", "BSP(A)": "BSP(A)", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "CPIM": "CPIM", "CPM": "CPM", "DBSP": "DBSP", "DCP": "DCP", "DEMSWP": "DEMSWP", "DPI": "DPI", "DPIN": "DPIN", "HINUP": "HINUP", "HND": "HND", "HSS": "HSS", "IKL": "IKL", "INC": "INC", "IUML": "IUML", "IVD": "IVD", "JJJKP": "JJJKP", "JKNPP": "JKNPP", "KYP": "KYP", "LIP": "LIP", "LPSP": "LPSP", "NAIP": "NAIP", "NCP": "NCP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "OP": "OP", "PDEMP": "PDEMP", "PLP": "PLP", "RKSP": "RKSP", "RMPOI": "RMPOI", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "RSP": "RSP", "SAD": "SAD", "SAD(M)": "SAD(M)", "SAKAP": "SAKAP", "SAPUNPA": "SAPUNPA", "SHS": "SHS", "SLDP": "SLDP", "SWAP": "SWAP", "Independent_1": "Independent_1", "Independent_2": "Independent_2", "Independent_3": "Independent_3", "Independent_4": "Independent_4", "Independent_5": "Independent_5", "Independent_6": "Independent_6", "Independent_7": "Independent_7", "Independent_8": "Independent_8", "Independent_9": "Independent_9", "Independent_10": "Independent_10"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 117, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:06:58.439653", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.604, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.56, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.488, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.069, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.124, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.488, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.287, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.287, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.619, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.568, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.568, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2c520a16c384478aa3ceeb7e5be37d11", "name": "Germany 2023 parliamentary (overnight germany_2023_bayern_landtag_erststimmen.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.statistik.bayern.de/mam/wahlen/landtagswahlen/ergebnisse/ltw_2023_stimmbezirksergebnisse.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CSU": "CSU", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "FREIE WAEHLER": "FREIE WAEHLER", "AfD": "AfD", "SPD": "SPD", "FDP": "FDP", "DIE LINKE": "DIE LINKE", "BP": "BP", "OEDP": "OEDP", "Die PARTEI": "Die PARTEI", "Tierschutzpartei": "Tierschutzpartei", "V-Partei3": "V-Partei3", "PdH": "PdH", "dieBasis": "dieBasis", "Volt": "Volt"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18806, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 8393, "cast_valid_mismatch": 256, "registered_not_positive": 8393}, "n_stations_flagged": 8647, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:06:05.395564", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.855, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.812, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.015, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.015, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18806}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6b3cae14025148fe85db8f4300335bdd", "name": "Germany 2023 parliamentary (overnight germany_2023_bayern_landtag_zweitstimmen.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.statistik.bayern.de/mam/wahlen/landtagswahlen/ergebnisse/ltw_2023_stimmbezirksergebnisse.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CSU": "CSU", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "FREIE WAEHLER": "FREIE WAEHLER", "AfD": "AfD", "SPD": "SPD", "FDP": "FDP", "DIE LINKE": "DIE LINKE", "BP": "BP", "OEDP": "OEDP", "Die PARTEI": "Die PARTEI", "Tierschutzpartei": "Tierschutzpartei", "V-Partei3": "V-Partei3", "PdH": "PdH", "dieBasis": "dieBasis", "Volt": "Volt"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18806, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 8393, "cast_valid_mismatch": 344, "registered_not_positive": 8393}, "n_stations_flagged": 8736, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:05:09.940330", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.855, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.812, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.015, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.015, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18806}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5e810e2af11840c0bc5654f001a0abe0", "name": "Canada 2022 local (overnight canada_2022_quebec_provincial.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://donnees.electionsquebec.qc.ca/production/provincial/resultats/archives/gen2022-10-03/resultats-bureau-vote.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"C.A.Q.-E.F.L.": "C.A.Q.-E.F.L.", "Q.S.": "Q.S.", "P.Q.": "P.Q.", "P.L.Q./Q.L.P.": "P.L.Q./Q.L.P.", "P.C.Q-E.E.D.": "P.C.Q-E.E.D.", "P.V.Q./G.P.Q.": "P.V.Q./G.P.Q.", "P.C.Q./C.P.Q": "P.C.Q./C.P.Q", "C.Q.": "C.Q.", "B.M.-E.B.H.": "B.M.-E.B.H.", "D.D.": "D.D.", "Ind.": "Ind.", "P.N.": "P.N.", "U.F.F.": "U.F.F.", "P51": "P51", "P.M.L.Q.": "P.M.L.Q.", "E.A.": "E.A.", "P.Cu.Q.": "P.Cu.Q.", "P.H.Q.": "P.H.Q.", "U.N.": "U.N.", "A.F.C.": "A.F.C.", "P.Li.Q.": "P.Li.Q.", "P.A.P.E.": "P.A.P.E."}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21765, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 3404, "cast_gt_registered": 3289}, "n_stations_flagged": 3405, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:04:06.768342", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.846, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.904, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.848, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.745, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.644, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.644, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.887, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21765}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "904fb632fca247af92c1c7bdf4799611", "name": "Australia 2025 parliamentary (overnight australia_2025_senate.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.aec.gov.au/31496/Website/External/aec-senate-formalpreferences-31496-NSW.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_ajp": "votes_ajp", "votes_alp": "votes_alp", "votes_asp": "votes_asp", "votes_auc": "votes_auc", "votes_aud": "votes_aud", "votes_av": "votes_av", "votes_cec": "votes_cec", "votes_clp": "votes_clp", "votes_cya": "votes_cya", "votes_davi": "votes_davi", "votes_ffpa": "votes_ffpa", "votes_gahe": "votes_gahe", "votes_gap": "votes_gap", "votes_grhe": "votes_grhe", "votes_grka": "votes_grka", "votes_grn": "votes_grn", "votes_grpf": "votes_grpf", "votes_hetp": "votes_hetp", "votes_hmp": "votes_hmp", "votes_iap": "votes_iap", "votes_jln": "votes_jln", "votes_lnp": "votes_lnp", "votes_lp": "votes_lp", "votes_lpnp": "votes_lpnp", "votes_ltp": "votes_ltp", "votes_np": "votes_np", "votes_on": "votes_on", "votes_pfhl": "votes_pfhl", "votes_sal": "votes_sal", "votes_sopa": "votes_sopa", "votes_spp": "votes_spp", "votes_unam": "votes_unam", "votes_vns": "votes_vns"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12831, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 12831, "cast_gt_registered": 12831}, "n_stations_flagged": 12831, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:03:27.154454", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.804, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.844, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.793, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.802, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.15, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.029, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.029, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 12831}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "abbcf252d7a646aca9f745cceac69b8c", "name": "Australia 2022 parliamentary (overnight australia_2022_senate.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.aec.gov.au/27966/Website/SenateDownloadsMenu-27966-Csv.htm (per-division files Downloads/SenateDivisionFirstPrefsByPollingPlaceDownload-27966-<DivisionID>.csv, 151 divisions; coords from Downloads/GeneralPollingPlacesDownload-27966.csv)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Animal_Justice_Party": "Animal_Justice_Party", "Australian_Christians": "Australian_Christians", "Australian_Democrats": "Australian_Democrats", "Australian_Federation_Party": "Australian_Federation_Party", "Australian_Progressives": "Australian_Progressives", "Australian_Values_Party": "Australian_Values_Party", "Citizens_Party": "Citizens_Party", "Country_Liberal_Party_NT": "Country_Liberal_Party_NT", "David_Pocock": "David_Pocock", "Drew_Pavlou_Democratic_Alliance": "Drew_Pavlou_Democratic_Alliance", "Federal_ICAC_Now": "Federal_ICAC_Now", "Fusion": "Fusion", "Great_Australian_Party": "Great_Australian_Party", "Greens": "Greens", "Hinch_Justice": "Hinch_Justice", "Indigenous_Aboriginal_Party": "Indigenous_Aboriginal_Party", "Informed_Medical_Options": "Informed_Medical_Options", "Jacqui_Lambie_Network": "Jacqui_Lambie_Network", "Kim_for_Canberra": "Kim_for_Canberra", "Labor": "Labor", "Legalise_Cannabis": "Legalise_Cannabis", "Liberal": "Liberal", "Liberal_Democrats": "Liberal_Democrats", "Liberal_National_Party_QLD": "Liberal_National_Party_QLD", "Liberal_Nationals_Coalition": "Liberal_Nationals_Coalition", "Nationals": "Nationals", "One_Nation": "One_Nation", "Reason_Australia": "Reason_Australia", "Rex_Patrick_Team": "Rex_Patrick_Team", "Seniors_United": "Seniors_United", "Shooters_Fishers_Farmers": "Shooters_Fishers_Farmers", "Socialist_Alliance": "Socialist_Alliance", "Sustainable_Australia": "Sustainable_Australia", "TNL": "TNL", "The_Local_Party": "The_Local_Party", "UG_ACT_Li": "UG_ACT_Li", "UG_NSW_Collins": "UG_NSW_Collins", "UG_NSW_Grzic": "UG_NSW_Grzic", "UG_NSW_Laing": "UG_NSW_Laing", "UG_NSW_Lim": "UG_NSW_Lim", "UG_NSW_Lu": "UG_NSW_Lu", "UG_NT_Rajwin": "UG_NT_Rajwin", "UG_QLD_Hamilton": "UG_QLD_Hamilton", "UG_QLD_Kochardy": "UG_QLD_Kochardy", "UG_QLD_Lyon": "UG_QLD_Lyon", "UG_QLD_Quinlivan": "UG_QLD_Quinlivan", "UG_QLD_Rogers": "UG_QLD_Rogers", "UG_QLD_Schefe": "UG_QLD_Schefe", "UG_QLD_Smith": "UG_QLD_Smith", "UG_QLD_Temple": "UG_QLD_Temple", "UG_SA_Hopper": "UG_SA_Hopper", "UG_TAS_Crothers": "UG_TAS_Crothers", "UG_TAS_Edwards": "UG_TAS_Edwards", "UG_VIC_Atkinson": "UG_VIC_Atkinson", "UG_VIC_Bond": "UG_VIC_Bond", "UG_VIC_De_Francesco": "UG_VIC_De_Francesco", "UG_VIC_Dicks": "UG_VIC_Dicks", "UG_VIC_Dillon": "UG_VIC_Dillon", "UG_VIC_Floyd": "UG_VIC_Floyd", "UG_VIC_Gonsalvez": "UG_VIC_Gonsalvez", "UG_VIC_Ridgeway": "UG_VIC_Ridgeway", "UG_VIC_Ross": "UG_VIC_Ross", "UG_VIC_Smith": "UG_VIC_Smith", "UG_VIC_Toscano": "UG_VIC_Toscano", "UG_VIC_Tran": "UG_VIC_Tran", "UG_WA_Buckle": "UG_WA_Buckle", "UG_WA_Burdett": "UG_WA_Burdett", "UG_WA_Mcdonald": "UG_WA_Mcdonald", "UG_WA_Murphy": "UG_WA_Murphy", "UG_WA_Pegrum": "UG_WA_Pegrum", "UG_WA_Vagh": "UG_WA_Vagh", "Unendorsed_Group_NSW_F": "Unendorsed_Group_NSW_F", "Unendorsed_Group_QLD_A": "Unendorsed_Group_QLD_A", "Unendorsed_Group_QLD_H": "Unendorsed_Group_QLD_H", "Unendorsed_Group_QLD_I": "Unendorsed_Group_QLD_I", "Unendorsed_Group_SA_E": "Unendorsed_Group_SA_E", "Unendorsed_Group_SA_M": "Unendorsed_Group_SA_M", "Unendorsed_Group_SA_O": "Unendorsed_Group_SA_O", "Unendorsed_Group_VIC_B": "Unendorsed_Group_VIC_B", "Unendorsed_Group_VIC_R": "Unendorsed_Group_VIC_R", "Unendorsed_Group_VIC_T": "Unendorsed_Group_VIC_T", "Unendorsed_Group_VIC_Y": "Unendorsed_Group_VIC_Y", "Unendorsed_Group_WA_K": "Unendorsed_Group_WA_K", "Unendorsed_Group_WA_P": "Unendorsed_Group_WA_P", "United_Australia_Party": "United_Australia_Party", "Victorian_Socialists": "Victorian_Socialists", "Western_Australia_Party": "Western_Australia_Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8479, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 8479, "cast_gt_registered": 8430}, "n_stations_flagged": 8479, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:03:01.584451", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.841, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.794, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.067, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.919, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.033, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.033, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8479}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e520717c1e044c919da4b84d44a6e27e", "name": "Iraq 2025 parliamentary (overnight iraq_2025_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Iraq", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ihec.iq/results-2025/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Kurdistan_Democratic_Party_KDP | \u067e\u0627\u0631\u062a\u06cc \u062f\u064a\u0645\u0648\u0643\u0631\u0627\u062a\u06cc \u0643\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646 [275]": "Kurdistan_Democratic_Party_KDP | \u067e\u0627\u0631\u062a\u06cc \u062f\u064a\u0645\u0648\u0643\u0631\u0627\u062a\u06cc \u0643\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646 [275]", "Patriotic_Union_of_Kurdistan_PUK | \u064a\u06d5\u06a9\u06ce\u062a\u06cc \u0646\u064a\u0634\u062a\u0645\u0627\u0646\u064a\u06cc \u06a9\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646 [222]": "Patriotic_Union_of_Kurdistan_PUK | \u064a\u06d5\u06a9\u06ce\u062a\u06cc \u0646\u064a\u0634\u062a\u0645\u0627\u0646\u064a\u06cc \u06a9\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646 [222]", "National_Stance_Movement | \u062a\u064a\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0642\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a / \u0631\u0647 \u0648 \u062a\u0649 \u0647\u06d5 \u06b5\u0648\u06ce\u0633\u062a\u06cc \u0646\u064a\u0634\u062a\u0645\u0627\u0646\u06cc / \u0647\u06d5 \u06b5\u0648\u06ce\u0633\u062a\u06cc [225]": "National_Stance_Movement | \u062a\u064a\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0642\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a / \u0631\u0647 \u0648 \u062a\u0649 \u0647\u06d5 \u06b5\u0648\u06ce\u0633\u062a\u06cc \u0646\u064a\u0634\u062a\u0645\u0627\u0646\u06cc / \u0647\u06d5 \u06b5\u0648\u06ce\u0633\u062a\u06cc [225]", "New_Generation_Movement | \u0646\u06d5\u0648\u06d5\u0649 \u0646\u0648\u06ce-\u0627\u0644\u062c\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u062f\u064a\u062f [288]": "New_Generation_Movement | \u0646\u06d5\u0648\u06d5\u0649 \u0646\u0648\u06ce-\u0627\u0644\u062c\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u062f\u064a\u062f [288]", "Kurdistan_Islamic_Union | \u0627\u0644\u0627\u062a\u062d\u0627\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646\u064a [278]": "Kurdistan_Islamic_Union | \u0627\u0644\u0627\u062a\u062d\u0627\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646\u064a [278]", "Kurdistan_Justice_Group | \u062c\u0645\u0627\u0639\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062f\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646\u064a\u0629 / \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 [285]": "Kurdistan_Justice_Group | \u062c\u0645\u0627\u0639\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062f\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646\u064a\u0629 / \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 [285]", "Our_Peoples_Front | \u062c\u0628\u0647\u0629 \u0634\u0639\u0628\u0646\u0627 / \u0628\u06d5\u0631\u06d5\u06cc \u06af\u06d5\u0644\u06d5\u06a9\u06d5\u0645\u0627\u0646 [261]": "Our_Peoples_Front | \u062c\u0628\u0647\u0629 \u0634\u0639\u0628\u0646\u0627 / \u0628\u06d5\u0631\u06d5\u06cc \u06af\u06d5\u0644\u06d5\u06a9\u06d5\u0645\u0627\u0646 [261]", "\u0631\u0639\u062f \u0631\u0641\u0639\u06d5 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0644\u0648\u062f \u06a9\u06c6\u06a9\u06c6\u064a\u06cc [247]": "\u0631\u0639\u062f \u0631\u0641\u0639\u06d5 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0644\u0648\u062f \u06a9\u06c6\u06a9\u06c6\u064a\u06cc [247]", "Iraqi_Turkmen_Front | \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0628\u0647\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0631\u0643\u0645\u0627\u0646\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a\u0629 [268]": "Iraqi_Turkmen_Front | \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0628\u0647\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0631\u0643\u0645\u0627\u0646\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a\u0629 [268]", "Kurdistan_Social_Democratic_Party | \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0634\u062a\u0631\u0627\u0643\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0645\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0637\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646\u064a [216]": "Kurdistan_Social_Democratic_Party | \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0634\u062a\u0631\u0627\u0643\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0645\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0637\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646\u064a [216]", "\u06a4\u064a\u0646\u0648\u0633 \u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0627\u0646 [232]": "\u06a4\u064a\u0646\u0648\u0633 \u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0627\u0646 [232]", "Taqaddum_Progress_Party | \u062d\u0632\u0628 \u062a\u0642\u062f\u0645 [255]": "Taqaddum_Progress_Party | \u062d\u0632\u0628 \u062a\u0642\u062f\u0645 [255]", "Anbar_Huwiyatuna | \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0646\u0628\u0627\u0631 \u0647\u0648\u064a\u062a\u0646\u0627 [205]": "Anbar_Huwiyatuna | \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0646\u0628\u0627\u0631 \u0647\u0648\u064a\u062a\u0646\u0627 [205]", "Qimam_Alliance | \u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0642\u0645\u0645 [283]": "Qimam_Alliance | \u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0642\u0645\u0645 [283]", "Azm_Alliance | \u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0639\u0632\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 /\u0639\u0632\u0645 [241]": "Azm_Alliance | \u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0639\u0632\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 /\u0639\u0632\u0645 [241]", "Tafawuq_Alliance | \u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0641\u0648\u0642 [266]": "Tafawuq_Alliance | \u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0641\u0648\u0642 [266]", "Siyada_National_Alliance | \u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0633\u064a\u0627\u062f\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a - \u062a\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0639 [221]": "Siyada_National_Alliance | \u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0633\u064a\u0627\u062f\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a - \u062a\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0639 [221]", "National_Resolution | \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a [269]": "National_Resolution | \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a [269]", "\u0627\u0644\u0642\u064a\u0627\u062f\u0629 [242]": "\u0627\u0644\u0642\u064a\u0627\u062f\u0629 [242]", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0645\u0631\u0627\u0646 [236]": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0645\u0631\u0627\u0646 [236]", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0646\u062a\u0634\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u0649 [246]": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0646\u062a\u0634\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u0649 [246]", "Tasmim_Alliance | \u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u062a\u0635\u0645\u064a\u0645 [252]": "Tasmim_Alliance | \u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u062a\u0635\u0645\u064a\u0645 [252]", "Sadiqoon_Movement | \u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642\u0648\u0646 [202]": "Sadiqoon_Movement | \u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642\u0648\u0646 [202]", "Reconstruction_and_Development_Coalition | \u0627\u0626\u062a\u0644\u0627\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0639\u0645\u0627\u0631 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0646\u0645\u064a\u0629 [207]": "Reconstruction_and_Development_Coalition | \u0627\u0626\u062a\u0644\u0627\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0639\u0645\u0627\u0631 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0646\u0645\u064a\u0629 [207]", "State_of_Law_Coalition | \u0627\u0626\u062a\u0644\u0627\u0641 \u062f\u0648\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u0646\u0648\u0646 [257]": "State_of_Law_Coalition | \u0627\u0626\u062a\u0644\u0627\u0641 \u062f\u0648\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u0646\u0648\u0646 [257]", "National_State_Forces_Alliance | \u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0642\u0648\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0629 [231]": "National_State_Forces_Alliance | \u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0642\u0648\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0629 [231]", "Huquq_Movement | \u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u062d\u0642\u0648\u0642 [251]": "Huquq_Movement | \u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u062d\u0642\u0648\u0642 [251]", "Badr_Organization | \u0645\u0646\u0638\u0645\u0629 \u0628\u062f\u0631 [218]": "Badr_Organization | \u0645\u0646\u0638\u0645\u0629 \u0628\u062f\u0631 [218]", "Abshir_Ya_Iraq | \u0627\u0628\u0634\u0631 \u064a\u0627 \u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 [224]": "Abshir_Ya_Iraq | \u0627\u0628\u0634\u0631 \u064a\u0627 \u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 [224]", "Faw_Zakho_Gathering | \u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0627\u0648 \u0632\u0627\u062e\u0648 [213]": "Faw_Zakho_Gathering | \u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0627\u0648 \u0632\u0627\u062e\u0648 [213]", "Iraqi_Foundation_Coalition | \u0627\u0626\u062a\u0644\u0627\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0633\u0627\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a [244]": "Iraqi_Foundation_Coalition | \u0627\u0626\u062a\u0644\u0627\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0633\u0627\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a [244]", "Khadamat_Alliance | \u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u062e\u062f\u0645\u0627\u062a [271]": "Khadamat_Alliance | \u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u062e\u062f\u0645\u0627\u062a [271]", "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0645\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a [259]": "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0645\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a [259]", "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u064a\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0634\u0627\u0626\u0631\u064a \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 [212]": "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u064a\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0634\u0627\u0626\u0631\u064a \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 [212]", "\u0643\u0627\u0648\u0647 \u0644\u0637\u064a\u0641 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u062f\u0627\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0646\u0643\u0646\u06d5 [208]": "\u0643\u0627\u0648\u0647 \u0644\u0637\u064a\u0641 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u062f\u0627\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0646\u0643\u0646\u06d5 [208]", "\u0626\u0627\u0643\u0627\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062a\u0648\u0641\u064a\u0642 \u062e\u0636\u0631 [253]": "\u0626\u0627\u0643\u0627\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062a\u0648\u0641\u064a\u0642 \u062e\u0636\u0631 [253]", "\u0647\u0627\u0648\u0627\u0631 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 [273]": "\u0647\u0627\u0648\u0627\u0631 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 [273]", "\u062f\u0644\u0634\u0627\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 [226]": "\u062f\u0644\u0634\u0627\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 [226]", "\u0627\u0634\u0631\u0627\u0642\u0629 \u0643\u0627\u0646\u0648\u0646 [245]": "\u0627\u0634\u0631\u0627\u0642\u0629 \u0643\u0627\u0646\u0648\u0646 [245]", "\u0634\u0639\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0648\u0627\u0646\u064a\u0629 [262]": "\u0634\u0639\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0648\u0627\u0646\u064a\u0629 [262]", "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u062f\u064a\u0644 [250]": "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u062f\u064a\u0644 [250]", "\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0633\u0627\u062f\u0629 \u0643\u0627\u0638\u0645 \u062c\u0627\u0631\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0643\u0631\u062d [293]": "\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0633\u0627\u062f\u0629 \u0643\u0627\u0638\u0645 \u062c\u0627\u0631\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0643\u0631\u062d [293]", "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0646\u0642\u0630\u0648\u0646 [209]": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0646\u0642\u0630\u0648\u0646 [209]", "\u0646\u0635\u064a\u0631 \u0646\u0635\u064a\u0641 \u062c\u0627\u0633\u0645 \u0646\u0635\u064a\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0643\u0627\u064a\u0634\u064a [214]": "\u0646\u0635\u064a\u0631 \u0646\u0635\u064a\u0641 \u062c\u0627\u0633\u0645 \u0646\u0635\u064a\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0643\u0627\u064a\u0634\u064a [214]", "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0633\u0648\u0645\u0631\u064a\u0648\u0646 [239]": "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0633\u0648\u0645\u0631\u064a\u0648\u0646 [239]", "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u0627\u0643 [210]": "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u0627\u0643 [210]", "\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0645\u0648\u0646 [223]": "\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0645\u0648\u0646 [223]", "\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u062c\u0627\u0633\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0646\u064a [238]": "\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u062c\u0627\u0633\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0646\u064a [238]", "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0648\u0627\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a [264]": "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0648\u0627\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a [264]", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 \u0644\u0644\u0625\u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d [270]": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 \u0644\u0644\u0625\u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d [270]", "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0645\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0637\u064a [206]": "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0645\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0637\u064a [206]", "\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0628\u0647\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u064a\u0644\u064a\u0629 [291]": "\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0628\u0647\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u064a\u0644\u064a\u0629 [291]", "\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u064a\u062f\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0631\u062c\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0628\u0648\u0631\u064a [215]": "\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u064a\u062f\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0631\u062c\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0628\u0648\u0631\u064a [215]", "\u062a\u064a\u0627\u0631 \u0642\u0636\u064a\u062a\u0646\u0627 [235]": "\u062a\u064a\u0627\u0631 \u0642\u0636\u064a\u062a\u0646\u0627 [235]", "\u0627\u0645\u0644 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 \u0630\u0631\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0642\u0627\u0628\u064a [227]": "\u0627\u0645\u0644 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 \u0630\u0631\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0642\u0627\u0628\u064a [227]", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0627\u0639\u064a [248]": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0627\u0639\u064a [248]", "\u0632\u064a\u062f \u0634\u0627\u0643\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0642\u064a\u0633\u064a [265]": "\u0632\u064a\u062f \u0634\u0627\u0643\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0642\u064a\u0633\u064a [265]", "\u0647\u064a\u0641\u0627\u0621 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 [274]": "\u0647\u064a\u0641\u0627\u0621 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 [274]", "\u0639\u0644\u064a \u062d\u0643\u0645\u062a \u062d\u0633\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0641\u062a\u062d\u064a \u0627\u0644 \u0639\u0627\u064a\u062f [276]": "\u0639\u0644\u064a \u062d\u0643\u0645\u062a \u062d\u0633\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0641\u062a\u062d\u064a \u0627\u0644 \u0639\u0627\u064a\u062f [276]", "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0639\u0644\u064a \u062d\u0633\u0646 [258]": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0639\u0644\u064a \u062d\u0633\u0646 [258]", "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u062f\u064a\u0627\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0648\u0644\u0627\u064b [249]": "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u062f\u064a\u0627\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0648\u0644\u0627\u064b [249]", "\u062b\u0627\u0628\u062a\u0648\u0646 [203]": "\u062b\u0627\u0628\u062a\u0648\u0646 [203]", "\u0635\u0642\u0648\u0631\u0646\u0627 [277]": "\u0635\u0642\u0648\u0631\u0646\u0627 [277]", "\u062c\u0627\u0633\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0627\u0635\u064a \u0631\u0627\u0636\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0645\u0627\u0634 [284]": "\u062c\u0627\u0633\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0627\u0635\u064a \u0631\u0627\u0636\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0645\u0627\u0634 [284]", "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u062d\u0627\u062a\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u062c\u0627\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0628\u0648\u0631\u064a [234]": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u062d\u0627\u062a\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u062c\u0627\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0628\u0648\u0631\u064a [234]", "\u0643\u062a\u0644\u0629 \u062f\u0639\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u0644\u0629 [289]": "\u0643\u062a\u0644\u0629 \u062f\u0639\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u0644\u0629 [289]", "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u0643\u0646\u0629 [233]": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u0643\u0646\u0629 [233]", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u064a\u062b\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a [230]": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u064a\u062b\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a [230]", "\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0645\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0629 [240]": "\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0645\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0629 [240]", "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u062d\u062f [279]": "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u062d\u062f [279]", "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0634\u0631\u0627\u0643\u062a\u0646\u0627 \u0641\u064a \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 [228]": "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0634\u0631\u0627\u0643\u062a\u0646\u0627 \u0641\u064a \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 [228]", "\u0627\u0644\u0634\u0631\u06af\u0627\u0637 \u0644\u0647\u0644\u0647\u0627 [243]": "\u0627\u0644\u0634\u0631\u06af\u0627\u0637 \u0644\u0647\u0644\u0647\u0627 [243]", "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0641\u0644\u064a\u062d \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0633\u062f\u064a [263]": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0641\u0644\u064a\u062d \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0633\u062f\u064a [263]", "\u062c\u0628\u0647\u0629 \u062a\u0631\u0643\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u062d\u062f [217]": "\u062c\u0628\u0647\u0629 \u062a\u0631\u0643\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u062d\u062f [217]", "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0628\u064a \u0641\u064a \u0643\u0631\u0643\u0648\u0643 [204]": "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0628\u064a \u0641\u064a \u0643\u0631\u0643\u0648\u0643 [204]", "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0646\u0642\u0627\u0630 \u062a\u0631\u0643\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0643\u0631\u0643\u0648\u0643 [229]": "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0646\u0642\u0627\u0630 \u062a\u0631\u0643\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0643\u0631\u0643\u0648\u0643 [229]", "\u0647\u06d5 \u0648\u0631\u064a \u0641\u062f\u0639\u0645 \u0631\u0636\u0627 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0627\u0641 [219]": "\u0647\u06d5 \u0648\u0631\u064a \u0641\u062f\u0639\u0645 \u0631\u0636\u0627 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0627\u0641 [219]", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0641\u0639\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a [282]": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0641\u0639\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a [282]", "\u063a\u0641\u0631\u0627\u0646 \u063a\u0636\u0628\u0627\u0646 \u0633\u0639\u062f\u064a \u0643\u0627\u0638\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0645\u064a\u0645\u064a [292]": "\u063a\u0641\u0631\u0627\u0646 \u063a\u0636\u0628\u0627\u0646 \u0633\u0639\u062f\u064a \u0643\u0627\u0638\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0645\u064a\u0645\u064a [292]", "\u0631\u0627\u0626\u062f \u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0627\u062c\u0628 \u0647\u0627\u0634\u0645 \u0645\u0627\u0644\u0643\u064a [287]": "\u0631\u0627\u0626\u062f \u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0627\u062c\u0628 \u0647\u0627\u0634\u0645 \u0645\u0627\u0644\u0643\u064a [287]", "\u0646\u064a\u0646\u0648\u0649 \u0644\u0627\u0647\u0644\u0647\u0627 [267]": "\u0646\u064a\u0646\u0648\u0649 \u0644\u0627\u0647\u0644\u0647\u0627 [267]", "\u0627\u062a\u062d\u0627\u062f \u0627\u0647\u0644 \u0646\u064a\u0646\u0648\u0649 [281]": "\u0627\u062a\u062d\u0627\u062f \u0627\u0647\u0644 \u0646\u064a\u0646\u0648\u0649 [281]", "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0634\u0631\u0648\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0628\u064a \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 [272]": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0634\u0631\u0648\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0628\u064a \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 [272]", "\u0627\u0644\u0647\u0648\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0629 [211]": "\u0627\u0644\u0647\u0648\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0629 [211]", "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0636\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u064a\u0632\u064a\u062f\u064a\u0629 [201]": "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0636\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u064a\u0632\u064a\u062f\u064a\u0629 [201]", "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0646\u064a\u0646\u0648\u0649 \u0623\u0648\u0644\u0627\u064b [290]": "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0646\u064a\u0646\u0648\u0649 \u0623\u0648\u0644\u0627\u064b [290]", "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u062f\u0628\u0627\u0621 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a [237]": "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u062f\u0628\u0627\u0621 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a [237]", "\u0645\u062f\u0646\u064a\u0648\u0646 [286]": "\u0645\u062f\u0646\u064a\u0648\u0646 [286]", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0648\u0627\u0621 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a [260]": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0648\u0627\u0621 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a [260]", "\u0633\u0644\u0648\u0649 \u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062c\u0627\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0628\u064a\u062f\u064a [280]": "\u0633\u0644\u0648\u0649 \u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062c\u0627\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0628\u064a\u062f\u064a [280]", "\u0648\u0627\u0633\u0637 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u062c\u0645\u0644 \u0628\u0627\u0644\u062e\u062f\u0645\u0627\u062a [220]": "\u0648\u0627\u0633\u0637 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u062c\u0645\u0644 \u0628\u0627\u0644\u062e\u062f\u0645\u0627\u062a [220]"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18, "granularity": "province", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:03:00.252631", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.364, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.016, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.369, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.22, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.364, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.016, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.794, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.635, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.409, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.032, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.508, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.008, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.445, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.361, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.369, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.369, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.22, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.22, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.197, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.197, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.521, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.356, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.356, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.571, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "72cf5770911c494cb6018ca5708f9d29", "name": "Iraq 2021 parliamentary (overnight iraq_2021_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Iraq", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ihec.iq/the-results-of-the-parliament-elections-2021/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u0627\u0626\u062a\u0644\u0627\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0645\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a": "\u0627\u0626\u062a\u0644\u0627\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0645\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a", "\u0627\u0626\u062a\u0644\u0627\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0629": "\u0627\u0626\u062a\u0644\u0627\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0629", "\u0627\u0626\u062a\u0644\u0627\u0641 \u062d\u0645\u0648\u0631\u0627\u0628\u064a": "\u0627\u0626\u062a\u0644\u0627\u0641 \u062d\u0645\u0648\u0631\u0627\u0628\u064a", "\u0627\u0626\u062a\u0644\u0627\u0641 \u062f\u0648\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u0646\u0648\u0646": "\u0627\u0626\u062a\u0644\u0627\u0641 \u062f\u0648\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u0646\u0648\u0646", "\u0627\u0626\u062a\u0644\u0627\u0641 \u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645\u0629 \u0648\u0637\u0646": "\u0627\u0626\u062a\u0644\u0627\u0641 \u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645\u0629 \u0648\u0637\u0646", "\u0627\u0626\u062a\u0644\u0627\u0641 \u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631\u0648\u0646": "\u0627\u0626\u062a\u0644\u0627\u0641 \u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631\u0648\u0646", "\u0627\u062a\u062d\u0627\u062f \u0628\u064a\u062b \u0646\u0647\u0631\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a": "\u0627\u062a\u062d\u0627\u062f \u0628\u064a\u062b \u0646\u0647\u0631\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a", "\u0627\u0634\u0631\u0627\u0642\u0629 \u0643\u0627\u0646\u0648\u0646": "\u0627\u0634\u0631\u0627\u0642\u0629 \u0643\u0627\u0646\u0648\u0646", "\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0646\u062a\u0641\u0627\u0636\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0639\u0628\u0627\u0646\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643\u0629 / \u0646\u062f\u0627\u0621 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642": "\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0646\u062a\u0641\u0627\u0636\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0639\u0628\u0627\u0646\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643\u0629 / \u0646\u062f\u0627\u0621 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642", "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639  \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a \u0644\u0623\u0647\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642": "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639  \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a \u0644\u0623\u0647\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642", "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0628\u064a \u0641\u064a \u0643\u0631\u0643\u0648\u0643": "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0628\u064a \u0641\u064a \u0643\u0631\u0643\u0648\u0643", "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0645\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0637\u064a": "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0645\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0637\u064a", "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0635\u062f\u064a": "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0635\u062f\u064a", "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u064a\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0634\u0627\u0626\u0631\u064a \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642": "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u064a\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0634\u0627\u0626\u0631\u064a \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642", "\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0628\u0647\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0631\u0643\u0645\u0627\u0646\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a\u0629": "\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0628\u0647\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0631\u0643\u0645\u0627\u0646\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a\u0629", "\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0628\u0647\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0628\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u062d\u062f\u0629": "\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0628\u0647\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0628\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u062d\u062f\u0629", "\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0645\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0629": "\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0645\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0629", "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0629 \u0641\u064a \u0643\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0629 \u0641\u064a \u0643\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642", "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u064a\u0632\u064a\u062f\u064a\u0629 \u0645\u0646 \u0627\u062c\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0625\u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d \u0648\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0642\u062f\u0645": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u064a\u0632\u064a\u062f\u064a\u0629 \u0645\u0646 \u0627\u062c\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0625\u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d \u0648\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0642\u062f\u0645", "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0645\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0637\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0622\u0634\u0648\u0631\u064a\u0629(\u0632\u0648\u0639\u0627)": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0645\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0637\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0622\u0634\u0648\u0631\u064a\u0629(\u0632\u0648\u0639\u0627)", "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0634\u062a\u0631\u0627\u0643\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0645\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0637\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646\u064a": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0634\u062a\u0631\u0627\u0643\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0645\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0637\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646\u064a", "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0645\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0637\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646\u064a": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0645\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0637\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646\u064a", "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u0648\u0639\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u0648\u0639\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a", "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u0648\u0639\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646\u064a_\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u0648\u0639\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646\u064a_\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642", "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f\u0646\u064a": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f\u0646\u064a", "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0634\u0648\u0631\u064a": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0634\u0648\u0631\u064a", "\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 \u0647\u0648\u064a\u062a\u0646\u0627": "\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 \u0647\u0648\u064a\u062a\u0646\u0627", "\u0627\u0644\u0643\u062a\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0629": "\u0627\u0644\u0643\u062a\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0629", "\u0627\u0644\u0643\u062a\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0631\u0629": "\u0627\u0644\u0643\u062a\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0631\u0629", "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u062c\u0644\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0639\u0628\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0644\u062f\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0631\u064a\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0634\u0648\u0631\u064a": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u062c\u0644\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0639\u0628\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0644\u062f\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0631\u064a\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0634\u0648\u0631\u064a", "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u062c\u0644\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0645\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0637\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u062d\u062f": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u062c\u0644\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0645\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0637\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u062d\u062f", "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u062d\u0627\u0641\u0638\u0648\u0646": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u062d\u0627\u0641\u0638\u0648\u0646", "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0634\u0631\u0648\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0634\u0631\u0648\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a", "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0646\u062a\u062c \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0646\u062a\u062c \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a", "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0646\u0642\u0630\u0648\u0646": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0646\u0642\u0630\u0648\u0646", "\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0626\u0627\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a": "\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0626\u0627\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a", "\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0639\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a": "\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0639\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a", "\u0627\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0646\u0635\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0642": "\u0627\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0646\u0635\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0642", "\u0627\u0647\u0627\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0631\u0642\u0627\u0637": "\u0627\u0647\u0627\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0631\u0642\u0627\u0637", "\u0628\u064a\u0627\u0631\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u064a\u0631": "\u0628\u064a\u0627\u0631\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u064a\u0631", "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0623\u0642\u062a\u062f\u0627\u0631 \u0648\u0637\u0646": "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0623\u0642\u062a\u062f\u0627\u0631 \u0648\u0637\u0646", "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0623\u0647\u0627\u0644\u064a \u0648\u0627\u0633\u0637 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0633\u062a\u0642\u0644": "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0623\u0647\u0627\u0644\u064a \u0648\u0627\u0633\u0637 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0633\u062a\u0642\u0644", "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u064a\u0627\u062f\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062e\u0644\u0635\u0629": "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u064a\u0627\u062f\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062e\u0644\u0635\u0629", "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0646\u0627\u0621 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d": "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0646\u0627\u0621 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d", "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0646\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a": "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0646\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a", "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062d\u0648\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a": "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062d\u0648\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a", "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0629 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u0648\u062d\u062f\u0629": "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0629 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u0648\u062d\u062f\u0629", "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u062f\u064a\u062f": "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u062f\u064a\u062f", "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0627\u0648 \u0632\u0627\u062e\u0648": "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0627\u0648 \u0632\u0627\u062e\u0648", "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0628\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u064a\u0636\u0627\u0621": "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0628\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u064a\u0636\u0627\u0621", "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0644\u0639\u0629": "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0644\u0639\u0629", "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0641\u0627\u0621\u0627\u062a \u0648\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0645\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0631": "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0641\u0627\u0621\u0627\u062a \u0648\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0645\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0631", "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0647\u0636\u0629 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0646\u0627\u0621": "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0647\u0636\u0629 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0646\u0627\u0621", "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u062d\u062f\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a\u0629": "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u062d\u062f\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a\u0629", "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0628\u0631\u0644\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0639\u0628": "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0628\u0631\u0644\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0639\u0628", "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u062a\u0631\u0628\u0648\u064a\u0648\u0646": "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u062a\u0631\u0628\u0648\u064a\u0648\u0646", "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u062a\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a": "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u062a\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a", "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0635\u0648\u062a \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0645\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0631": "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0635\u0648\u062a \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0645\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0631", "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0648\u0637\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a": "\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0648\u0637\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a", "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0622\u0645\u0627\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a": "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0622\u0645\u0627\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a", "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0642\u062a\u0635\u0627\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a/\u0627\u0642\u062a\u0635\u0627\u062f\u064a\u0648\u0646": "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0642\u062a\u0635\u0627\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a/\u0627\u0642\u062a\u0635\u0627\u062f\u064a\u0648\u0646", "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0642\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a": "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0642\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a", "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u062a\u062d": "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u062a\u062d", "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0648\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f\u0646\u064a\u0629": "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0648\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f\u0646\u064a\u0629", "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0647\u062c \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a": "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0647\u062c \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a", "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u062a\u0635\u0645\u064a\u0645": "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u062a\u0635\u0645\u064a\u0645", "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u062a\u0642\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a /\u062a\u0642\u062f\u0645": "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u062a\u0642\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a /\u062a\u0642\u062f\u0645", "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u062c\u0645\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0631\u0646\u0627 \u0647\u0648\u064a\u062a\u0646\u0627": "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u062c\u0645\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0631\u0646\u0627 \u0647\u0648\u064a\u062a\u0646\u0627", "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0639\u0632\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 /\u0639\u0632\u0645": "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0639\u0632\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 /\u0639\u0632\u0645", "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0642\u0648\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0629": "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0642\u0648\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0629", "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0643\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646/\u0647\u0627\u0648\u067e\u0647 \u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646\u0649 \u0643\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646": "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0643\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646/\u0647\u0627\u0648\u067e\u0647 \u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646\u0649 \u0643\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646", "\u062a\u0646\u0638\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0627\u062e\u0644": "\u062a\u0646\u0638\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0627\u062e\u0644", "\u062a\u064a\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u062d\u062f\u064a": "\u062a\u064a\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u062d\u062f\u064a", "\u062a\u064a\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0631\u0627\u062a\u064a\u0646": "\u062a\u064a\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0631\u0627\u062a\u064a\u0646", "\u062a\u064a\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0644\u0645\u0629": "\u062a\u064a\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0644\u0645\u0629", "\u062a\u064a\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a": "\u062a\u064a\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a", "\u062a\u064a\u0627\u0631 \u0648\u0644\u0627\u0626\u064a\u0648\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a": "\u062a\u064a\u0627\u0631 \u0648\u0644\u0627\u0626\u064a\u0648\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a", "\u062c\u0628\u0647\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0648\u0646": "\u062c\u0628\u0647\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0648\u0646", "\u062c\u0628\u0647\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u062d\u062f\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0629": "\u062c\u0628\u0647\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u062d\u062f\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0629", "\u062c\u0628\u0647\u0629 \u062a\u0631\u0643\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u062d\u062f": "\u062c\u0628\u0647\u0629 \u062a\u0631\u0643\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u062d\u062f", "\u062c\u0645\u0627\u0639\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062f\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646\u064a\u0629/\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642": "\u062c\u0645\u0627\u0639\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062f\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646\u064a\u0629/\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642", "\u062d\u0631\u0627\u0643 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u062f\u064a\u062f": "\u062d\u0631\u0627\u0643 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u062f\u064a\u062f", "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0625\u0645\u062a\u062f\u0627\u062f": "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0625\u0645\u062a\u062f\u0627\u062f", "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0625\u0646\u062c\u0627\u0632": "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0625\u0646\u062c\u0627\u0632", "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u063a\u0644\u0628\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0647": "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u063a\u0644\u0628\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0647", "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0628\u0627\u0628 \u0644\u0644\u062a\u063a\u064a\u0631": "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0628\u0627\u0628 \u0644\u0644\u062a\u063a\u064a\u0631", "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0629": "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0629", "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631-\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0646\u062a\u0641\u0627\u0636\u0647 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u062a\u063a\u064a\u064a\u0631": "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631-\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0646\u062a\u0641\u0627\u0636\u0647 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u062a\u063a\u064a\u064a\u0631", "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0641\u0627\u0621 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a\u0629": "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0641\u0627\u0621 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a\u0629", "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0644\u064a\u0648\u0646": "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0644\u064a\u0648\u0646", "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0628\u0644\u0627\u062f\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0629": "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0628\u0644\u0627\u062f\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0629", "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u062d\u0633\u0645 \u0644\u0644\u0627\u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d": "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u062d\u0633\u0645 \u0644\u0644\u0627\u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d", "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u062d\u0642\u0648\u0642": "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u062d\u0642\u0648\u0642", "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0643\u0641\u0649": "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0643\u0641\u0649", "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0646\u0627\u0632\u0644 \u0623\u062e\u0630 \u062d\u0642\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0645\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0637\u064a\u0629": "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0646\u0627\u0632\u0644 \u0623\u062e\u0630 \u062d\u0642\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0645\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0637\u064a\u0629", "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0648\u0639\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0629": "\u062d\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0648\u0639\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0629", "\u062d\u0632\u0628  \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u0627\u0646\u0629": "\u062d\u0632\u0628  \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u0627\u0646\u0629", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u062a\u0641\u0627\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u062a\u0641\u0627\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u064a\u0632\u064a\u062f\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0645\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0637\u064a": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u064a\u0632\u064a\u062f\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0645\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0637\u064a", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0645\u0647\u0648\u0631\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u062c\u0645\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0645\u0647\u0648\u0631\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0635\u062d\u064a\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a (\u062a\u0635\u062d\u064a\u062d)": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0635\u062d\u064a\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a (\u062a\u0635\u062d\u064a\u062d)", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0642\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u064a\u0632\u064a\u062f\u064a": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0642\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u064a\u0632\u064a\u062f\u064a", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0631\u064a\u0629 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0645\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0637\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u064a\u0632\u064a\u062f\u064a\u0629": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0631\u064a\u0629 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0645\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0637\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u064a\u0632\u064a\u062f\u064a\u0629", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0648\u0627\u0631 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u062a\u063a\u064a\u064a\u0631": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0648\u0627\u0631 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u062a\u063a\u064a\u064a\u0631", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0627\u0639\u064a": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0627\u0639\u064a", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0639\u0628 \u0644\u0644\u0625\u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0639\u0628 \u0644\u0644\u0625\u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0648\u0628\u064a\u0648\u0646": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0648\u0628\u064a\u0648\u0646", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062c\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062c\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0633\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f\u0646\u064a": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0633\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f\u0646\u064a", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0634\u0631\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0628\u064a": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0634\u0631\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0628\u064a", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u0646\u064a\u064a\u0646 \u0644\u0644\u0627\u0639\u0645\u0627\u0631": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u0646\u064a\u064a\u0646 \u0644\u0644\u0627\u0639\u0645\u0627\u0631", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u064a\u062f\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0631\u0643\u0645\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u064a\u062f\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0631\u0643\u0645\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u062e\u0628\u0629": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u062e\u0628\u0629", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0641\u0627\u0621 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0641\u0627\u0621 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0641\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0641\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642\u064a", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u064a\u0642\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u064a\u0642\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u062b\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0625\u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u062b\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0625\u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a", "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0643\u0627\u062f\u062d\u064a \u0643\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646": "\u062d\u0632\u0628 \u0643\u0627\u062f\u062d\u064a \u0643\u0648\u0631\u062f\u0633\u062a\u0627\u0646", "\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0645\u0648\u0646": "\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0645\u0648\u0646", "\u0643\u062a\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0633\u062a\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0631": "\u0643\u062a\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0633\u062a\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0631", "\u0643\u062a\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0636\u062d\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0629": "\u0643\u062a\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0636\u062d\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0637\u0646\u064a\u0629", "\u0643\u062a\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0641\u0627\u0621 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u062a\u063a\u064a\u064a\u0631": "\u0643\u062a\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0641\u0627\u0621 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u062a\u063a\u064a\u064a\u0631", "\u0643\u062a\u0644\u0629 \u062f\u0631\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642": "\u0643\u062a\u0644\u0629 \u062f\u0631\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642", "\u0643\u062a\u0644\u0629 \u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0647\u0636\u0629 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645": "\u0643\u062a\u0644\u0629 \u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0647\u0636\u0629 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645", "\u0643\u062a\u0644\u0629 \u0645\u0633\u062a\u0642\u0644\u0648\u0646": "\u0643\u062a\u0644\u0629 \u0645\u0633\u062a\u0642\u0644\u0648\u0646", "\u0644\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 \u0645\u062a\u062d\u062f\u0648\u0646": "\u0644\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0627\u0642 \u0645\u062a\u062d\u062f\u0648\u0646", "\u0645\u0631\u0634\u062d\u0648\u0646 \u0645\u0633\u062a\u0642\u0644\u0648\u0646": "\u0645\u0631\u0634\u062d\u0648\u0646 \u0645\u0633\u062a\u0642\u0644\u0648\u0646", "\u0645\u0634\u0631\u0648\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0625\u0631\u0627\u062f\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0639\u0628\u064a\u0629": "\u0645\u0634\u0631\u0648\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0625\u0631\u0627\u062f\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0639\u0628\u064a\u0629", "\u0648\u0627\u062b\u0642\u0648\u0646": "\u0648\u0627\u062b\u0642\u0648\u0646"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 92, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 92, "registered_not_positive": 92}, "n_stations_flagged": 92, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:02:58.966359", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.128, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.116, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.374, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.218, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.128, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.532, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.116, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.459, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.377, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.387, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.124, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.27, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.218, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.218, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.471, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.471, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.323, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.323, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.539, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.539, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 92}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dfe5825b50854c20a6c8d9b93aa41365", "name": "Australia 2022 local (overnight australia_victoria_2022_legislative_assembly_per_booth.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.vec.vic.gov.au/results/state-election-results/2022-state-election-results/results-by-district/<slug>-district-results/<slug>-district-results-by-voting-centre", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Angry_Victorians": "Angry_Victorians", "Animal_Justice": "Animal_Justice", "Companions_Pets": "Companions_Pets", "DLP": "DLP", "Family_First": "Family_First", "Freedom_Party": "Freedom_Party", "Greens": "Greens", "Health_Australia": "Health_Australia", "Hinch_Justice": "Hinch_Justice", "IND_Agirtan": "IND_Agirtan", "IND_Ainslie": "IND_Ainslie", "IND_Alsaimary": "IND_Alsaimary", "IND_Altmann": "IND_Altmann", "IND_Anger": "IND_Anger", "IND_Bakerpearce": "IND_Bakerpearce", "IND_Bansemer": "IND_Bansemer", "IND_Banwell": "IND_Banwell", "IND_Barcatta": "IND_Barcatta", "IND_Barton": "IND_Barton", "IND_Bauch": "IND_Bauch", "IND_Bergwerf": "IND_Bergwerf", "IND_Bingham": "IND_Bingham", "IND_Birchall": "IND_Birchall", "IND_Bolton": "IND_Bolton", "IND_Borsos": "IND_Borsos", "IND_Brymer": "IND_Brymer", "IND_Campbell": "IND_Campbell", "IND_Capon": "IND_Capon", "IND_Carr": "IND_Carr", "IND_Casley": "IND_Casley", "IND_Cole": "IND_Cole", "IND_Cook": "IND_Cook", "IND_Cordnerhunt": "IND_Cordnerhunt", "IND_Cupper": "IND_Cupper", "IND_Davis": "IND_Davis", "IND_Defrancesco": "IND_Defrancesco", "IND_Doukas": "IND_Doukas", "IND_Doyle": "IND_Doyle", "IND_Dragwidge": "IND_Dragwidge", "IND_Eckel": "IND_Eckel", "IND_Edwards": "IND_Edwards", "IND_Elmustapha": "IND_Elmustapha", "IND_Erciyas": "IND_Erciyas", "IND_Esler": "IND_Esler", "IND_Fenton": "IND_Fenton", "IND_Frederico": "IND_Frederico", "IND_French": "IND_French", "IND_Garra": "IND_Garra", "IND_Gibson": "IND_Gibson", "IND_Gnieslaw": "IND_Gnieslaw", "IND_Greco": "IND_Greco", "IND_Hathway": "IND_Hathway", "IND_Hawkins": "IND_Hawkins", "IND_Helou": "IND_Helou", "IND_Ho": "IND_Ho", "IND_Honey": "IND_Honey", "IND_Hopper": "IND_Hopper", "IND_Huybregts": "IND_Huybregts", "IND_Isma": "IND_Isma", "IND_Jobe": "IND_Jobe", "IND_Juhasz": "IND_Juhasz", "IND_Kaltmann": "IND_Kaltmann", "IND_Kelsall": "IND_Kelsall", "IND_King": "IND_King", "IND_Kioupelis": "IND_Kioupelis", "IND_Koelmeyer": "IND_Koelmeyer", "IND_Kwan": "IND_Kwan", "IND_Langdon": "IND_Langdon", "IND_Lardner": "IND_Lardner", "IND_Laurie": "IND_Laurie", "IND_Lee": "IND_Lee", "IND_Liston": "IND_Liston", "IND_Lowe": "IND_Lowe", "IND_Lund": "IND_Lund", "IND_Mackallah": "IND_Mackallah", "IND_Martin": "IND_Martin", "IND_Mccabe": "IND_Mccabe", "IND_Mccluskey": "IND_Mccluskey", "IND_Mead": "IND_Mead", "IND_Menadue": "IND_Menadue", "IND_Milne": "IND_Milne", "IND_Moinuddin": "IND_Moinuddin", "IND_Moody": "IND_Moody", "IND_Murphy": "IND_Murphy", "IND_Nuske": "IND_Nuske", "IND_Odonnell": "IND_Odonnell", "IND_Otto": "IND_Otto", "IND_Owen": "IND_Owen", "IND_Paredes": "IND_Paredes", "IND_Parel": "IND_Parel", "IND_Perera": "IND_Perera", "IND_Pilli": "IND_Pilli", "IND_Pincini": "IND_Pincini", "IND_Proctor": "IND_Proctor", "IND_Purcell": "IND_Purcell", "IND_Quince": "IND_Quince", "IND_Ragupathy": "IND_Ragupathy", "IND_Ray": "IND_Ray", "IND_Reid": "IND_Reid", "IND_Rigg": "IND_Rigg", "IND_Sabhlok": "IND_Sabhlok", "IND_Sagoo": "IND_Sagoo", "IND_Saloumi": "IND_Saloumi", "IND_Sanaghan": "IND_Sanaghan", "IND_Sawant": "IND_Sawant", "IND_Seymour": "IND_Seymour", "IND_Sheed": "IND_Sheed", "IND_Skelton": "IND_Skelton", "IND_Stefanopoulos": "IND_Stefanopoulos", "IND_Sullivan": "IND_Sullivan", "IND_Tachos": "IND_Tachos", "IND_Taylor": "IND_Taylor", "IND_Theodossopoulou": "IND_Theodossopoulou", "IND_Thornton": "IND_Thornton", "IND_Timms": "IND_Timms", "IND_Torney": "IND_Torney", "IND_Toscano": "IND_Toscano", "IND_Tseng": "IND_Tseng", "IND_Verma": "IND_Verma", "IND_Vincent": "IND_Vincent", "IND_Vo": "IND_Vo", "IND_White": "IND_White", "IND_Whitehead": "IND_Whitehead", "IND_Whitehill": "IND_Whitehill", "IND_Willis": "IND_Willis", "IND_Wolfe": "IND_Wolfe", "IND_Woolcock": "IND_Woolcock", "IND_Zhao": "IND_Zhao", "Labor": "Labor", "Legalise_Cannabis": "Legalise_Cannabis", "Liberal": "Liberal", "Liberal_Democrats": "Liberal_Democrats", "Nationals": "Nationals", "New_Democrats": "New_Democrats", "One_Nation": "One_Nation", "Reason": "Reason", "Shooters_Fishers_Farmers": "Shooters_Fishers_Farmers", "Transport_Matters": "Transport_Matters", "Victorian_Socialists": "Victorian_Socialists"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2206, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2193, "registered_not_positive": 2206}, "n_stations_flagged": 2206, "created_at": "2026-08-23T09:02:52.451968", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.841, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.794, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.067, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.919, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.033, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.033, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2206}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "22c62c588db94f0ca6a487301d061e78", "name": "India 2019 local (overnight india_odisha_2019_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2019, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Odisha/Odisha_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AAAP": "AAAP", "ABHM": "ABHM", "AIFB": "AIFB", "AITC": "AITC", "AKSJP": "AKSJP", "ANC": "ANC", "APoI": "APoI", "BAHUMP": "BAHUMP", "BJD": "BJD", "BJP": "BJP", "BMUP": "BMUP", "BMtrP": "BMtrP", "BSP": "BSP", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "CPIM": "CPIM", "CPM": "CPM", "FPI": "FPI", "GGP": "GGP", "HND": "HND", "ICPa": "ICPa", "INC": "INC", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_100_2": "Independent_100_2", "Independent_100_3": "Independent_100_3", "Independent_100_4": "Independent_100_4", "Independent_101_1": "Independent_101_1", "Independent_101_2": "Independent_101_2", "Independent_101_3": "Independent_101_3", "Independent_101_4": "Independent_101_4", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_103_2": "Independent_103_2", "Independent_107_1": "Independent_107_1", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "Independent_111_2": "Independent_111_2", "Independent_111_3": "Independent_111_3", "Independent_112_1": "Independent_112_1", "Independent_112_2": "Independent_112_2", "Independent_112_3": "Independent_112_3", "Independent_113_1": "Independent_113_1", "Independent_113_2": "Independent_113_2", "Independent_113_3": "Independent_113_3", "Independent_113_4": "Independent_113_4", "Independent_113_5": "Independent_113_5", "Independent_113_6": "Independent_113_6", "Independent_114_1": "Independent_114_1", "Independent_114_2": "Independent_114_2", "Independent_114_3": "Independent_114_3", "Independent_114_4": "Independent_114_4", "Independent_114_5": "Independent_114_5", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_115_2": "Independent_115_2", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "Independent_116_2": "Independent_116_2", "Independent_116_3": "Independent_116_3", "Independent_117_1": "Independent_117_1", "Independent_117_2": "Independent_117_2", "Independent_117_3": "Independent_117_3", "Independent_117_4": "Independent_117_4", "Independent_117_5": "Independent_117_5", "Independent_118_1": "Independent_118_1", "Independent_118_2": "Independent_118_2", "Independent_118_3": "Independent_118_3", "Independent_119_1": "Independent_119_1", "Independent_119_2": "Independent_119_2", "Independent_119_3": "Independent_119_3", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "Independent_11_3": "Independent_11_3", "Independent_120_1": "Independent_120_1", "Independent_121_1": "Independent_121_1", "Independent_122_1": "Independent_122_1", "Independent_122_2": "Independent_122_2", "Independent_122_3": "Independent_122_3", "Independent_122_4": "Independent_122_4", "Independent_123_1": "Independent_123_1", "Independent_124_1": "Independent_124_1", "Independent_124_2": "Independent_124_2", "Independent_124_3": "Independent_124_3", "Independent_124_4": "Independent_124_4", "Independent_125_1": "Independent_125_1", "Independent_126_1": "Independent_126_1", "Independent_127_1": "Independent_127_1", "Independent_127_2": "Independent_127_2", "Independent_127_3": "Independent_127_3", "Independent_128_1": "Independent_128_1", "Independent_129_1": "Independent_129_1", "Independent_129_2": "Independent_129_2", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "Independent_12_3": "Independent_12_3", "Independent_12_4": "Independent_12_4", "Independent_130_1": "Independent_130_1", "Independent_131_1": "Independent_131_1", "Independent_131_2": "Independent_131_2", "Independent_131_3": "Independent_131_3", "Independent_132_1": "Independent_132_1", "Independent_133_1": "Independent_133_1", "Independent_133_2": "Independent_133_2", "Independent_133_3": "Independent_133_3", "Independent_133_4": "Independent_133_4", "Independent_134_1": "Independent_134_1", "Independent_135_1": "Independent_135_1", "Independent_135_2": "Independent_135_2", "Independent_136_1": "Independent_136_1", "Independent_136_2": "Independent_136_2", "Independent_136_3": "Independent_136_3", "Independent_137_1": "Independent_137_1", "Independent_137_2": "Independent_137_2", "Independent_138_1": "Independent_138_1", "Independent_138_2": "Independent_138_2", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "Independent_13_3": "Independent_13_3", "Independent_13_4": "Independent_13_4", "Independent_13_5": "Independent_13_5", "Independent_13_6": "Independent_13_6", "Independent_13_7": "Independent_13_7", "Independent_13_8": "Independent_13_8", "Independent_140_1": "Independent_140_1", "Independent_142_1": "Independent_142_1", "Independent_143_1": "Independent_143_1", "Independent_143_2": "Independent_143_2", "Independent_144_1": "Independent_144_1", "Independent_144_2": "Independent_144_2", "Independent_145_1": "Independent_145_1", "Independent_145_2": "Independent_145_2", "Independent_146_1": "Independent_146_1", "Independent_146_2": "Independent_146_2", "Independent_147_1": "Independent_147_1", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "Independent_14_3": "Independent_14_3", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_16_2": "Independent_16_2", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "Independent_17_3": "Independent_17_3", "Independent_17_4": "Independent_17_4", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "Independent_19_3": "Independent_19_3", "Independent_19_4": "Independent_19_4", "Independent_19_5": "Independent_19_5", "Independent_19_6": "Independent_19_6", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "Independent_24_2": "Independent_24_2", "Independent_24_3": "Independent_24_3", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "Independent_25_4": "Independent_25_4", "Independent_25_5": "Independent_25_5", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "Independent_27_3": "Independent_27_3", "Independent_27_4": "Independent_27_4", "Independent_27_5": "Independent_27_5", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "Independent_29_4": "Independent_29_4", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "Independent_30_3": "Independent_30_3", "Independent_30_4": "Independent_30_4", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_32_3": "Independent_32_3", "Independent_32_4": "Independent_32_4", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_34_3": "Independent_34_3", "Independent_34_4": "Independent_34_4", "Independent_34_5": "Independent_34_5", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "Independent_35_2": "Independent_35_2", "Independent_35_3": "Independent_35_3", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "Independent_37_3": "Independent_37_3", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_39_2": "Independent_39_2", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_43_2": "Independent_43_2", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_54_3": "Independent_54_3", "Independent_54_4": "Independent_54_4", "Independent_54_5": "Independent_54_5", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_55_2": "Independent_55_2", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_57_2": "Independent_57_2", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_59_2": "Independent_59_2", "Independent_59_3": "Independent_59_3", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_64_2": "Independent_64_2", "Independent_64_3": "Independent_64_3", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_65_2": "Independent_65_2", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_66_2": "Independent_66_2", "Independent_66_3": "Independent_66_3", "Independent_66_4": "Independent_66_4", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_69_3": "Independent_69_3", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "Independent_6_2": "Independent_6_2", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "Independent_70_2": "Independent_70_2", "Independent_71_1": "Independent_71_1", "Independent_71_2": "Independent_71_2", "Independent_71_3": "Independent_71_3", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_72_2": "Independent_72_2", "Independent_72_3": "Independent_72_3", "Independent_72_4": "Independent_72_4", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_79_1": "Independent_79_1", "Independent_79_2": "Independent_79_2", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "Independent_7_2": "Independent_7_2", "Independent_7_3": "Independent_7_3", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "Independent_81_2": "Independent_81_2", "Independent_81_3": "Independent_81_3", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_83_2": "Independent_83_2", "Independent_83_3": "Independent_83_3", "Independent_84_1": "Independent_84_1", "Independent_84_2": "Independent_84_2", "Independent_84_3": "Independent_84_3", "Independent_84_4": "Independent_84_4", "Independent_84_5": "Independent_84_5", "Independent_85_1": "Independent_85_1", "Independent_85_2": "Independent_85_2", "Independent_86_1": "Independent_86_1", "Independent_87_1": "Independent_87_1", "Independent_87_2": "Independent_87_2", "Independent_87_3": "Independent_87_3", "Independent_87_4": "Independent_87_4", "Independent_87_5": "Independent_87_5", "Independent_87_6": "Independent_87_6", "Independent_88_1": "Independent_88_1", "Independent_88_2": "Independent_88_2", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_89_2": "Independent_89_2", "Independent_89_3": "Independent_89_3", "Independent_89_4": "Independent_89_4", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "Independent_90_1": "Independent_90_1", "Independent_91_1": "Independent_91_1", "Independent_91_2": "Independent_91_2", "Independent_91_3": "Independent_91_3", "Independent_91_4": "Independent_91_4", "Independent_91_5": "Independent_91_5", "Independent_93_1": "Independent_93_1", "Independent_94_1": "Independent_94_1", "Independent_94_2": "Independent_94_2", "Independent_94_3": "Independent_94_3", "Independent_95_1": "Independent_95_1", "Independent_95_2": "Independent_95_2", "Independent_97_1": "Independent_97_1", "Independent_97_2": "Independent_97_2", "Independent_97_3": "Independent_97_3", "Independent_97_4": "Independent_97_4", "Independent_98_1": "Independent_98_1", "Independent_98_2": "Independent_98_2", "Independent_98_3": "Independent_98_3", "Independent_98_4": "Independent_98_4", "Independent_99_1": "Independent_99_1", "Independent_99_2": "Independent_99_2", "JKPP": "JKPP", "JMM": "JMM", "JPJD": "JPJD", "KJD": "KJD", "KOKD": "KOKD", "KRUP": "KRUP", "KS": "KS", "MVD": "MVD", "NCP": "NCP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "OPD": "OPD", "PBI": "PBI", "PCHVP": "PCHVP", "PSPL": "PSPL", "PUJP": "PUJP", "RAIM": "RAIM", "SP": "SP", "SUCI(C)": "SUCI(C)", "US": "US", "skd": "skd"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 146, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-22T23:36:17.698040", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.43, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.324, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.656, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.664, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.43, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.43, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.324, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.324, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.563, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.527, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 146}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "26e98ac001c04897b38342c6ed792d02", "name": "South Africa 2014 parliamentary (overnight south_africa_2014_national_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://maps.elections.org.za/NPEResultsFinder/Handlers/NPEDataHandler.ashx?type=allnationalresults&vdnumber={VD}&delimID=54&natEEID=291&natBallot=1", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY": "AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY", "AFRICAN INDEPENDENT CONGRESS": "AFRICAN INDEPENDENT CONGRESS", "AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS": "AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS", "AFRICAN PEOPLE'S CONVENTION": "AFRICAN PEOPLE'S CONVENTION", "AGANG SOUTH AFRICA": "AGANG SOUTH AFRICA", "AL JAMA-AH": "AL JAMA-AH", "AZANIAN PEOPLE'S ORGANISATION": "AZANIAN PEOPLE'S ORGANISATION", "BUSHBUCKRIDGE RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION": "BUSHBUCKRIDGE RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION", "CONGRESS  OF THE PEOPLE": "CONGRESS  OF THE PEOPLE", "DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE": "DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE", "ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS": "ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS", "FIRST NATION LIBERATION ALLIANCE": "FIRST NATION LIBERATION ALLIANCE", "FRONT NASIONAAL/FRONT NATIONAL": "FRONT NASIONAAL/FRONT NATIONAL", "INDEPENDENT CIVIC ORGANISATION OF SOUTH AFRICA": "INDEPENDENT CIVIC ORGANISATION OF SOUTH AFRICA", "INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY": "INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY", "KEEP IT STRAIGHT AND SIMPLE": "KEEP IT STRAIGHT AND SIMPLE", "KINGDOM GOVERNANCE MOVEMENT": "KINGDOM GOVERNANCE MOVEMENT", "MINORITY FRONT": "MINORITY FRONT", "NATIONAL FREEDOM PARTY": "NATIONAL FREEDOM PARTY", "PAN AFRICANIST CONGRESS OF AZANIA": "PAN AFRICANIST CONGRESS OF AZANIA", "PAN AFRICANIST MOVEMENT": "PAN AFRICANIST MOVEMENT", "PATRIOTIC ALLIANCE": "PATRIOTIC ALLIANCE", "PEOPLES ALLIANCE": "PEOPLES ALLIANCE", "UBUNTU PARTY": "UBUNTU PARTY", "UNITED CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY": "UNITED CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY", "UNITED CONGRESS": "UNITED CONGRESS", "UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT": "UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT", "VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS": "VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS", "WORKERS AND SOCIALIST PARTY": "WORKERS AND SOCIALIST PARTY"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21275, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 21274, "registered_not_positive": 21275}, "n_stations_flagged": 21275, "created_at": "2026-08-22T23:30:32.399129", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.673, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.765, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.758, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.641, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.439, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.507, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.449, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.299, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.575, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.758, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.758, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.524, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.481, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.877, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21275}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bbd3a96323344c639d98ee673e753342", "name": "Netherlands 2021 parliamentary (overnight netherlands_2021_tweede_kamer.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Netherlands", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.overheid.nl/dataset/verkiezingsuitslag-tweede-kamer-2021", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"50PLUS": "50PLUS", "BBB": "BBB", "BIJ1": "BIJ1", "Blanco (Zeven, A.J.L.B.)": "Blanco (Zeven, A.J.L.B.)", "CDA": "CDA", "CODE ORANJE": "CODE ORANJE", "ChristenUnie": "ChristenUnie", "D66": "D66", "DE FEESTPARTIJ (DFP)": "DE FEESTPARTIJ (DFP)", "DENK": "DENK", "De Groenen": "De Groenen", "Forum voor Democratie": "Forum voor Democratie", "GROENLINKS": "GROENLINKS", "JA21": "JA21", "JEZUS LEEFT": "JEZUS LEEFT", "JONG": "JONG", "LP (Libertaire Partij)": "LP (Libertaire Partij)", "Lijst Henk Krol": "Lijst Henk Krol", "Modern Nederland": "Modern Nederland", "NIDA": "NIDA", "NLBeter": "NLBeter", "OPRECHT": "OPRECHT", "PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)": "PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)", "Partij van de Arbeid (P.v.d.A.)": "Partij van de Arbeid (P.v.d.A.)", "Partij van de Eenheid": "Partij van de Eenheid", "Partij voor de Dieren": "Partij voor de Dieren", "Partij voor de Republiek": "Partij voor de Republiek", "Piratenpartij": "Piratenpartij", "SP (Socialistische Partij)": "SP (Socialistische Partij)", "Splinter": "Splinter", "Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij (SGP)": "Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij (SGP)", "Trots op Nederland (TROTS)": "Trots op Nederland (TROTS)", "U-Buntu Connected Front": "U-Buntu Connected Front", "VVD": "VVD", "Volt": "Volt", "Vrij en Sociaal Nederland": "Vrij en Sociaal Nederland", "Wij zijn Nederland": "Wij zijn Nederland"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13824, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 5067, "registered_not_positive": 13824, "cast_gt_registered": 13791, "invalid_gt_cast": 9}, "n_stations_flagged": 13824, "created_at": "2026-08-22T23:29:53.726349", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.835, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.732, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.864, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.812, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.732, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.924, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.146, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.472, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.019, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.019, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 13824}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "616f4afe049e4d2a9c0d79ac107a40a9", "name": "Portugal 2022 parliamentary (overnight portugal_2022_legislative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.eleicoes.mai.gov.pt/legislativas2022/ (MAI static JSON API: assets/static/territory-results/territory-results-{LOCAL-key}-AR.json)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PS": "PS", "PPD/PSD": "PPD/PSD", "CH": "CH", "PCP-PEV": "PCP-PEV", "B.E.": "B.E.", "L": "L", "PAN": "PAN", "VP": "VP", "PCTP/MRPP": "PCTP/MRPP", "R.I.R.": "R.I.R.", "CDS-PP": "CDS-PP", "E": "E", "MAS": "MAS", "MPT": "MPT", "PTP": "PTP", "PPD/PSD.CDS-PP.PPM": "PPD/PSD.CDS-PP.PPM", "ADN": "ADN", "JPP": "JPP", "A": "A", "NC": "NC", "PPD/PSD.CDS-PP": "PPD/PSD.CDS-PP", "PPM": "PPM"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3092, "granularity": "parish", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-22T23:29:44.225895", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.7, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.951, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.847, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.758, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.7, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.814, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.563, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.758, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.758, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.917, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.139, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.139, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3092}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6f5c337a8aaa460cbc62758caa25bf6c", "name": "Japan 2017 parliamentary (overnight japan_2017_representatives.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.soumu.go.jp/senkyo/senkyo_s/data/shugiin48/index.html", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"LDP": "LDP", "CDP": "CDP", "Kibo": "Kibo", "Komeito": "Komeito", "JCP": "JCP", "Ishin": "Ishin", "SDP": "SDP", "NipponKokoro": "NipponKokoro", "HappinessRealization": "HappinessRealization", "ShintoDaichi": "ShintoDaichi", "ShijiSeitoNashi": "ShijiSeitoNashi"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 47, "granularity": "region", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-22T23:29:43.707585", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.87, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.933, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.821, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.744, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.789, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.567, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.247, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.744, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.743, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.093, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 47}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6003a4790e8a4d3c914c669da7de53c5", "name": "India 2014 parliamentary (overnight india_2014_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/All_States/All_States_GE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"A S P": "A S P", "AAAP": "AAAP", "AAMJP": "AAMJP", "AAP": "AAP", "ABAS": "ABAS", "ABCD(A)": "ABCD(A)", "ABHKP": "ABHKP", "ABHM": "ABHM", "ABJS": "ABJS", "ABML(S)": "ABML(S)", "ABMP": "ABMP", "ABRS": "ABRS", "ABSC": "ABSC", "ABSP": "ABSP", "ABSR": "ABSR", "ABVCP": "ABVCP", "AD": "AD", "ADMK": "ADMK", "ADPT": "ADPT", "ADSMK": "ADSMK", "ADSP": "ADSP", "ADUP": "ADUP", "AGP": "AGP", "AGRJP": "AGRJP", "AIACP": "AIACP", "AIFB": "AIFB", "AIMF": "AIMF", "AIMIM": "AIMIM", "AINRC": "AINRC", "AIPF": "AIPF", "AIRSP": "AIRSP", "AITC": "AITC", "AIUDF": "AIUDF", "AJKMP": "AJKMP", "AJSUP": "AJSUP", "AKAAD": "AKAAD", "AKAKRP": "AKAKRP", "AKBAP": "AKBAP", "AKBJHP": "AKBJHP", "AKBMP": "AKBMP", "ALHP": "ALHP", "AMB": "AMB", "AMP": "AMP", "AMS": "AMS", "ANC": "ANC", "AOP": "AOP", "APCP": "APCP", "APM": "APM", "APRSSP": "APRSSP", "APoI": "APoI", "ARP": "ARP", "ARPS": "ARPS", "ARVP": "ARVP", "ARWP": "ARWP", "ASP": "ASP", "ASaP": "ASaP", "ATBP": "ATBP", "AVIRP": "AVIRP", "Aa S P": "Aa S P", "AwVP": "AwVP", "BA S D": "BA S D", "BBC": "BBC", "BBM": "BBM", "BBMP": "BBMP", "BBPSP": "BBPSP", "BC": "BC", "BCBDP": "BCBDP", "BCP": "BCP", "BCUF": "BCUF", "BDBRAJP": "BDBRAJP", "BED": "BED", "BEMP": "BEMP", "BGTD": "BGTD", "BHBP": "BHBP", "BHNKP": "BHNKP", "BHPP": "BHPP", "BHSSP": "BHSSP", "BIP": "BIP", "BJD": "BJD", "BJJD": "BJJD", "BJKD": "BJKD", "BJKVP": "BJKVP", "BJM": "BJM", "BJP": "BJP", "BJPARTY": "BJPARTY", "BJSP": "BJSP", "BKLJP": "BKLJP", "BKP": "BKP", "BKPP": "BKPP", "BKSL": "BKSL", "BKrD": "BKrD", "BLSP": "BLSP", "BMF": "BMF", "BMNSP": "BMNSP", "BMSM": "BMSM", "BMUP": "BMUP", "BNIP": "BNIP", "BNJD": "BNJD", "BNNP": "BNNP", "BOPF": "BOPF", "BPC": "BPC", "BRABSVP": "BRABSVP", "BRAVP": "BRAVP", "BRMD": "BRMD", "BRPI": "BRPI", "BRPP": "BRPP", "BRVP": "BRVP", "BSCP": "BSCP", "BSD": "BSD", "BSDL": "BSDL", "BSDS": "BSDS", "BSKD": "BSKD", "BSKP": "BSKP", "BSP": "BSP", "BSP(A)": "BSP(A)", "BSP(K)": "BSP(K)", "BVA": "BVA", "BVLP": "BVLP", "BVM": "BVM", "BYS": "BYS", "BaSaP": "BaSaP", "BaVaP": "BaVaP", "BhJaSP": "BhJaSP", "BhNP": "BhNP", "BhNaP": "BhNaP", "BhSMP": "BhSMP", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "CPIM": "CPIM", "CPM": "CPM", "CSM": "CSM", "DABAP": "DABAP", "DBSP": "DBSP", "DCP": "DCP", "DESEP": "DESEP", "DFBL": "DFBL", "DMDK": "DMDK", "DMK": "DMK", "DND": "DND", "DNP": "DNP", "DPPS": "DPPS", "DaP": "DaP", "DaVP": "DaVP", "EKSP": "EKSP", "ESKP": "ESKP", "ETMK": "ETMK", "GGP": "GGP", "GOA": "GOA", "GRIP": "GRIP", "GSRP": "GSRP", "GaAP": "GaAP", "HEP": "HEP", "HJCBL": "HJCBL", "HJP": "HJP", "HKRD": "HKRD", "HND": "HND", "HSCP": "HSCP", "HVD": "HVD", "HiPPa": "HiPPa", "HiSP": "HiSP", "IBSP": "IBSP", "IBSPK": "IBSPK", "ICSP": "ICSP", "IJP": "IJP", "IKL": "IKL", "ILP(AP)": "ILP(AP)", "INC": "INC", "IND": "IND", "INL": "INL", "INLD": "INLD", "IOP": "IOP", "IPFT": "IPFT", "IPGP": "IPGP", "IPP": "IPP", "ISSP": "ISSP", "IUC": "IUC", "IUML": "IUML", "IVD": "IVD", "IVP": "IVP", "JAP": "JAP", "JBSP": "JBSP", "JD(S)": "JD(S)", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "JDP": "JDP", "JDR": "JDR", "JGP": "JGP", "JHAP": "JHAP", "JHP": "JHP", "JJ": "JJ", "JKM": "JKM", "JKN": "JKN", "JKNPP": "JKNPP", "JKP": "JKP", "JKP(N)": "JKP(N)", "JKPDP": "JKPDP", "JM": "JM", "JMBP": "JMBP", "JMM": "JMM", "JMM(U)": "JMM(U)", "JND": "JND", "JPC": "JPC", "JPJD": "JPJD", "JPS": "JPS", "JRPa": "JRPa", "JSEP": "JSEP", "JSK": "JSK", "JSMP": "JSMP", "JVBP": "JVBP", "JVD": "JVD", "JVM": "JVM", "JaRaP": "JaRaP", "JaRaPa": "JaRaPa", "JaSPa": "JaSPa", "JanSP": "JanSP", "JeSM": "JeSM", "KAP": "KAP", "KCVP": "KCVP", "KDC": "KDC", "KEC(M)": "KEC(M)", "KMBS": "KMBS", "KOKD": "KOKD", "KS": "KS", "KVD": "KVD", "LB": "LB", "LD": "LD", "LJP": "LJP", "LKJP": "LKJP", "LPI(V)": "LPI(V)", "LPR": "LPR", "LPSP": "LPSP", "LS": "LS", "LSP": "LSP", "LSWP": "LSWP", "LoRP": "LoRP", "MADP": "MADP", "MAHP": "MAHP", "MAMAK": "MAMAK", "MBCOI": "MBCOI", "MBT": "MBT", "MCO": "MCO", "MCPI": "MCPI", "MD": "MD", "MDMK": "MDMK", "MDPF": "MDPF", "MEDP": "MEDP", "MHD": "MHD", "MKUP": "MKUP", "MMKA": "MMKA", "MMM": "MMM", "MNDP": "MNDP", "MNS": "MNS", "MOP": "MOP", "MOSP": "MOSP", "MPS(T)": "MPS(T)", "MVA": "MVA", "MaJP": "MaJP", "MaSP": "MaSP", "MaSPa": "MaSPa", "MwSP": "MwSP", "NADP": "NADP", "NAJC": "NAJC", "NAP": "NAP", "NBDP": "NBDP", "NBNP": "NBNP", "NCP": "NCP", "NDEP": "NDEP", "NEP": "NEP", "NIP": "NIP", "NJC": "NJC", "NLP": "NLP", "NMK": "NMK", "NNP": "NNP", "NOC": "NOC", "NOTA": "NOTA", "NP": "NP", "NPEP": "NPEP", "NPF": "NPF", "NPT": "NPT", "NRSN": "NRSN", "NSBP": "NSBP", "NTP": "NTP", "NYP": "NYP", "NaLP": "NaLP", "PAP": "PAP", "PBI": "PBI", "PCHVP": "PCHVP", "PDS": "PDS", "PECP": "PECP", "PG": "PG", "PGSP": "PGSP", "PHRC": "PHRC", "PLP": "PLP", "PMK": "PMK", "PMSP": "PMSP", "PPA": "PPA", "PPI": "PPI", "PPIS": "PPIS", "PPOI": "PPOI", "PRCP": "PRCP", "PRISM": "PRISM", "PRSP": "PRSP", "PSJP": "PSJP", "PSS": "PSS", "PT": "PT", "PWPI": "PWPI", "QED": "QED", "RAC": "RAC", "RADP": "RADP", "RAHM": "RAHM", "RAIM": "RAIM", "RAKP": "RAKP", "RAPa": "RAPa", "RBC": "RBC", "RBCP": "RBCP", "RBHP": "RBHP", "RBS": "RBS", "RCMP": "RCMP", "RDHP": "RDHP", "REP": "REP", "RGD": "RGD", "RGOP": "RGOP", "RJ": "RJ", "RJAP": "RJAP", "RJAVP": "RJAVP", "RJD": "RJD", "RJJM": "RJJM", "RJM": "RJM", "RJNP": "RJNP", "RJP(E)": "RJP(E)", "RJPK": "RJPK", "RJVP": "RJVP", "RKEP": "RKEP", "RKSP": "RKSP", "RLD": "RLD", "RMGP": "RMGP", "RMOP": "RMOP", "RND": "RND", "RP(K)": "RP(K)", "RPC(S)": "RPC(S)", "RPD": "RPD", "RPI": "RPI", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "RPI(KH)": "RPI(KH)", "RPIE": "RPIE", "RPP(LB)": "RPP(LB)", "RPS": "RPS", "RRP": "RRP", "RSD": "RSD", "RSMD": "RSMD", "RSOSP": "RSOSP", "RSP": "RSP", "RSPK(B)": "RSPK(B)", "RSPS": "RSPS", "RSSDP": "RSSDP", "RSWD": "RSWD", "RTKP": "RTKP", "RUC": "RUC", "RVLP": "RVLP", "RVMP": "RVMP", "RVNP": "RVNP", "RVP": "RVP", "RWSP": "RWSP", "RaAD": "RaAD", "RaBaP": "RaBaP", "RaCP": "RaCP", "RaIP": "RaIP", "RaJPa": "RaJPa", "RaJSP": "RaJSP", "RaMSP": "RaMSP", "RrSP": "RrSP", "RsAD": "RsAD", "RshJP": "RshJP", "RtJP": "RtJP", "RtrJP": "RtrJP", "S(J)": "S(J)", "SAD": "SAD", "SAD(M)": "SAD(M)", "SAMO": "SAMO", "SAP": "SAP", "SARP": "SARP", "SBSP": "SBSP", "SDF": "SDF", "SDP": "SDP", "SDPI": "SDPI", "SHP": "SHP", "SHS": "SHS", "SJD": "SJD", "SJP(R)": "SJP(R)", "SJPA": "SJPA", "SKLP": "SKLP", "SKM": "SKM", "SLAP": "SLAP", "SLP(L)": "SLP(L)", "SP": "SP", "SP(I)": "SP(I)", "SPP": "SPP", "SRP": "SRP", "SSAD": "SSAD", "SSBD": "SSBD", "SSD": "SSD", "SSKP": "SSKP", "SSPD": "SSPD", "STR": "STR", "SUCI": "SUCI", "SVPP": "SVPP", "SVRP": "SVRP", "SWJP": "SWJP", "SWP": "SWP", "SWPI": "SWPI", "SWSP": "SWSP", "SaBP": "SaBP", "SaDa": "SaDa", "SaSaP": "SaSaP", "SaVP": "SaVP", "SamSP": "SamSP", "TDP": "TDP", "TECPI": "TECPI", "TLP": "TLP", "TNMC": "TNMC", "TPGC": "TPGC", "TRMRPPI": "TRMRPPI", "TRS": "TRS", "TTNC": "TTNC", "UCPI": "UCPI", "UDP": "UDP", "UMK": "UMK", "UPI": "UPI", "UPP": "UPP", "UPRP": "UPRP", "VAJP": "VAJP", "VCK": "VCK", "VHS": "VHS", "VIP": "VIP", "VJCP": "VJCP", "VSP": "VSP", "VoP": "VoP", "WPOI": "WPOI", "YSRCP": "YSRCP", "YuS": "YuS", "aicp": "aicp", "aimpr": "aimpr", "asdp": "asdp", "bhmm": "bhmm", "bhp": "bhp", "bjdi": "bjdi", "bjyp": "bjyp", "bns": "bns", "chp": "chp", "grac": "grac", "hkd": "hkd", "igp": "igp", "jhspt": "jhspt", "kajp": "kajp", "lpi": "lpi", "mmsp": "mmsp", "nuzp": "nuzp", "ojm": "ojm", "pjdl": "pjdl", "pms": "pms", "raup": "raup", "ravp": "ravp", "rdsc": "rdsc", "shsap": "shsap", "skd": "skd", "sps": "sps", "ssrd": "ssrd"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 543, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-22T23:29:41.910852", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.604, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.56, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.617, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.488, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.069, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.658, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.275, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.617, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.617, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.488, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.818, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.576, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.576, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 543}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f53f9fd5f1af4faf938173c12607af50", "name": "United Kingdom 2024 parliamentary (overnight uk_2024_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-10009/HoC-GE2024-results-by-constituency.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Con": "Con", "Lab": "Lab", "LD": "LD", "RUK": "RUK", "Green": "Green", "SNP": "SNP", "PC": "PC", "DUP": "DUP", "SF": "SF", "SDLP": "SDLP", "UUP": "UUP", "APNI": "APNI", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 650, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-22T23:29:37.929663", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.864, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.951, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.832, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.75, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.5, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.144, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.286, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.124, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.043, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 650}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "85750b42113d4f1caf2c90c9f72e4d57", "name": "Turkey 2023 presidential (overnight turkey_2023_presidential_r1_sandik.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Turkey", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://acikveri.ysk.gov.tr/  (YSK Acik Veri Portali; API /api/getSecimSandikSonucList?secimId=20230&secimTuru=9&sorguTuru=2 per il/ilce, secimCevresiId BLANK; abroad yurtIciDisi=2&ulkeId=-1; customs gumrukId=-1)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Erdogan": "Erdogan", "Ince": "Ince", "Kilicdaroglu": "Kilicdaroglu", "Ogan": "Ogan"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 192333, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 46, "cast_gt_registered": 3824}, "n_stations_flagged": 3824, "created_at": "2026-08-22T22:03:20.995816", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.462, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.85, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.285, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.108, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.462, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.474, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.747, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.366, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.342, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.995, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.222, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.285, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.285, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.108, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.108, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.193, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.388, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.178, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.178, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.177, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.177, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 192333}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "626ccff84d53488c8983be59ab86cb20", "name": "Mexico 2018 presidential (overnight mexico_2018_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2018, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://computos2018.ine.mx/20180708_2130_CW.zip (Cmputos Distritales 2018, archivoCorte 20180708_2130_CW; nested 20180708_2130_CW_presidencia.zip -> presidencia.csv)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"amlo_morena_pt_pes": "amlo_morena_pt_pes", "anaya_pan_prd_mc": "anaya_pan_prd_mc", "meade_pri_pvem_na": "meade_pri_pvem_na", "zavala_indep": "zavala_indep", "elbronco_indep": "elbronco_indep"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 156840, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1253, "cast_gt_registered": 1101}, "n_stations_flagged": 1312, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:56:31.025136", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.702, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.958, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.675, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.452, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.702, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.162, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.547, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.452, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.372, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.652, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "National Regeneration Movemenr (MORENA)", "winner_candidate": "Andr\u00e9s Manuel L\u00f3pez Obrador", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "National Action Party (PAN)", "margin": 30.91, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MEX", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 156840}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ae6441f80363405c92bcea10102c0a8c", "name": "Bolivia 2020 presidential (overnight bolivia_2020_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bolivia", "year": 2020, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ebol20/elec-bol20/master/elec_bol20/datos_1_intermedios/2020/comp/exportacion_EG2020_actual.csv (OEP SCORC final computo export EG2020, mirrored by ebol20/elec-bol20)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"MAS": "MAS", "CC": "CC", "CREEMOS": "CREEMOS", "FPV": "FPV", "PAN_BOL": "PAN_BOL"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 35597, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:54:37.648925", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.523, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.569, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.275, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.209, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.523, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.569, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.726, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.837, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.48, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.275, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.275, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.209, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.209, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.199, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.199, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.303, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.303, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.655, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.628, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 35597}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f2da9e7196bf4ecfbf2dbe1917a0b1cf", "name": "South Africa 2019 parliamentary (overnight south_africa_2019_national_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.elections.org.za/home/NPEPublicReports/699/Results%20Report/{PROV}/{MUNI}/{VD}.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ACDP": "ACDP", "A.C.D": "A.C.D", "ACM": "ACM", "ACO": "ACO", "ADEC": "ADEC", "AIC": "AIC", "ANC": "ANC", "APC": "APC", "ARU": "ARU", "ASC": "ASC", "ATM": "ATM", "AASD": "AASD", "AGANG SA": "AGANG SA", "ALJAMA": "ALJAMA", "ATA": "ATA", "AZAPO": "AZAPO", "BRA": "BRA", "BLF": "BLF", "ZACP": "ZACP", "CPM": "CPM", "CSA": "CSA", "COPE": "COPE", "DA": "DA", "DLC": "DLC", "ECOFORUM": "ECOFORUM", "EFF": "EFF", "F4SD": "F4SD", "FREE DEMS": "FREE DEMS", "FN": "FN", "GOOD": "GOOD", "ICOSA": "ICOSA", "IFP": "IFP", "IRC": "IRC", "LAND": "LAND", "MF": "MF", "NFP": "NFP", "NPA": "NPA", "NAPF": "NAPF", "PAC": "PAC", "PA": "PA", "PRM": "PRM", "PAU": "PAU", "SRWP": "SRWP", "SAMEBA": "SAMEBA", "SANCOTA": "SANCOTA", "UDM": "UDM", "VF Plus": "VF Plus", "WF": "WF"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 22920, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 640}, "n_stations_flagged": 640, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:53:40.046636", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.378, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.389, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.727, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.623, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.378, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.389, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.472, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.575, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.644, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.623, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.489, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.489, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.461, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.461, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 22920}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fdc9776cab61486bb9f47febe53395d1", "name": "Bangladesh 2018 parliamentary (overnight bangladesh_2018_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bangladesh", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Bangladeshi_general_election", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_AL": "votes_AL", "votes_BDB": "votes_BDB", "votes_BJP": "votes_BJP", "votes_BKM": "votes_BKM", "votes_BKP": "votes_BKP", "votes_BNP": "votes_BNP", "votes_BTF": "votes_BTF", "votes_GF": "votes_GF", "votes_IAB": "votes_IAB", "votes_Ind": "votes_Ind", "votes_JASAD": "votes_JASAD", "votes_JP(E)": "votes_JP(E)", "votes_JP(M)": "votes_JP(M)", "votes_JSD(Rab)": "votes_JSD(Rab)", "votes_JUI(B)": "votes_JUI(B)", "votes_JeI": "votes_JeI", "votes_KSJL": "votes_KSJL", "votes_LDP": "votes_LDP", "votes_WPB": "votes_WPB"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 300, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 284, "registered_not_positive": 285}, "n_stations_flagged": 285, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:52:42.890173", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.163, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 0.781, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.252, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.097, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.163, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.291, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.195, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.635, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.409, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.413, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.103, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.985, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.167, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.252, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.252, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.097, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.097, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.095, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.095, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.423, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.423, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.188, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.188, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.899, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.389, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.389, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 300}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f20ee6f2e5db4f3aa0e5e0100f8a1202", "name": "Kenya 2017 presidential (overnight kenya_2017oct_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Kenya", "year": 2017, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/s3.sourceafrica.net/documents/119942/IEBC-Data-Report-of-2017-Elections-April-2020.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_aukot_thirdway": "votes_aukot_thirdway", "votes_dida_arc": "votes_dida_arc", "votes_jirongo_udp": "votes_jirongo_udp", "votes_kaluyu_ind": "votes_kaluyu_ind", "votes_kenyatta_jubilee": "votes_kenyatta_jubilee", "votes_wainaina_ind": "votes_wainaina_ind", "votes_nyagah_ind": "votes_nyagah_ind", "votes_odinga_nasa": "votes_odinga_nasa"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 48, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:52:42.619443", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.985, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.12, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.512, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.408, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.985, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.12, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.53, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.273, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.426, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.588, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.483, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.322, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.322, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.657, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.657, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.773, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.773, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.601, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.601, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 48}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6c795d86091c408ab56ce3fd013a2e70", "name": "Kenya 2017 presidential (overnight kenya_2017aug_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Kenya", "year": 2017, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/cjwinchester/kenya-2017-votes/raw/master/kv.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_aukot_thirdway": "votes_aukot_thirdway", "votes_dida_arc": "votes_dida_arc", "votes_jirongo_udp": "votes_jirongo_udp", "votes_kaluyu_ind": "votes_kaluyu_ind", "votes_kenyatta_jubilee": "votes_kenyatta_jubilee", "votes_wainaina_ind": "votes_wainaina_ind", "votes_nyagah_ind": "votes_nyagah_ind", "votes_odinga_nasa": "votes_odinga_nasa"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 291, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:52:41.833728", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.985, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.12, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.512, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.408, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.985, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.12, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.53, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.273, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.426, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.588, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.483, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.322, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.322, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.657, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.657, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.773, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.773, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.601, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.601, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 291}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5901ef44a3d848089153171f9b66c2e4", "name": "Ethiopia 2021 parliamentary (overnight ethiopia_2021_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Ethiopia", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Ethiopian_general_election (per-constituency vote table transcribed from NEBE official results, https://nebe.org.et/index.php/am/electionresult)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PP": "PP", "ECSJ": "ECSJ", "NMA": "NMA", "EP": "EP", "BP": "BP", "FEP": "FEP", "AEUO": "AEUO", "ESDP": "ESDP", "GPDP": "GPDP", "HEDP": "HEDP", "ADPM": "ADPM", "NGP": "NGP", "APP": "APP", "KPDP": "KPDP", "EPRP": "EPRP", "WPDF": "WPDF", "ANC": "ANC", "GPLM": "GPLM", "EDU": "EDU", "GDP": "GDP", "ARDUF": "ARDUF", "ALF": "ALF", "RP": "RP", "PLM": "PLM", "KDP": "KDP", "SPUDO": "SPUDO", "SUP": "SUP", "MDP": "MDP", "EIP": "EIP", "OLM": "OLM", "EFDUF": "EFDUF", "WNM": "WNM", "GPLDM": "GPLDM", "ONLF": "ONLF", "KPDU": "KPDU", "KGP": "KGP", "RRDP": "RRDP", "BPFM": "BPFM", "WPDP": "WPDP", "ANDM": "ANDM", "DPDO": "DPDO", "ENUP": "ENUP", "HDO": "HDO", "WSDP": "WSDP", "Independent": "Independent"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 473, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 13}, "n_stations_flagged": 13, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:52:40.559984", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.777, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.639, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.29, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.136, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.777, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.444, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.161, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.707, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.955, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.489, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.241, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.29, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.29, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.136, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.199, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.199, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.462, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.462, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.563, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.39, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.39, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 473}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3eec58044f5a4b56b062bb0acf35fb6f", "name": "Senegal 2024 parliamentary (overnight senegal_2024_legislative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Senegal", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://conseilconstitutionnel.sn/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/RESULTTATS-DEPARTEMENTAL-ET-NATIONAL-1.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AND LIGUEY SUNU REW": "AND LIGUEY SUNU REW", "SENEGAAL KESE": "SENEGAAL KESE", "RV NAATANGUE": "RV NAATANGUE", "UNION DES GROUPES PATRIOTIQUES": "UNION DES GROUPES PATRIOTIQUES", "KIRAAY AK NATANGUE": "KIRAAY AK NATANGUE", "XAAL YOON": "XAAL YOON", "UNION CITOYENNE BUNT- BI": "UNION CITOYENNE BUNT- BI", "JUBANTI SENEGAL": "JUBANTI SENEGAL", "AND CI KOOLUTE AKS": "AND CI KOOLUTE AKS", "ALSAR": "ALSAR", "NAFOORE SENEGAL": "NAFOORE SENEGAL", "UNION NATIONALE POUR L'INTEGRATION, LE TRAVAIL ET L'EQUITE": "UNION NATIONALE POUR L'INTEGRATION, LE TRAVAIL ET L'EQUITE", "SAMM SA GAFAKA-SAMM SA ELLEG ACSIF": "SAMM SA GAFAKA-SAMM SA ELLEG ACSIF", "WAREEF": "WAREEF", "ACTIONS": "ACTIONS", "UNION NAATALL KAAW-GUI": "UNION NAATALL KAAW-GUI", "DUNDU LENEEN": "DUNDU LENEEN", "ANDU NAWLE": "ANDU NAWLE", "LES NATIONALISTES": "LES NATIONALISTES", "MANKOO LIGGEEYAL SENEGAAL": "MANKOO LIGGEEYAL SENEGAAL", "DEKKAL TERANGA": "DEKKAL TERANGA", "AND DOOLEL LIGUEY KAT YI": "AND DOOLEL LIGUEY KAT YI", "ENSEMBLE POUR LE SENEGAL": "ENSEMBLE POUR LE SENEGAL", "AND BEESAL SENEGAL": "AND BEESAL SENEGAL", "GARAP-ADS": "GARAP-ADS", "GOX YU BEES": "GOX YU BEES", "SAMM SUNU REW JOTALI KADDU ASKANWI": "SAMM SUNU REW JOTALI KADDU ASKANWI", "DEFAR SA GOKH": "DEFAR SA GOKH", "FEDERATION DU RENOUVEAU": "FEDERATION DU RENOUVEAU", "ALLIANCE JEF JEL": "ALLIANCE JEF JEL", "PASTEF": "PASTEF", "ALLIANCE NATIONALE POUR LA PATRIE": "ALLIANCE NATIONALE POUR LA PATRIE", "FARLU": "FARLU", "AND SUXALI PRODUCTION TRANSPORT AK COMMMERCE": "AND SUXALI PRODUCTION TRANSPORT AK COMMMERCE", "SECTEUR PRIV\u00c3\u2030": "SECTEUR PRIV\u00c3\u2030", "DIAM AK NJARIN": "DIAM AK NJARIN", "SAMM SA KAADU": "SAMM SA KAADU", "PARTI BES DU NIAKK": "PARTI BES DU NIAKK", "TAKKU WALLU": "TAKKU WALLU", "GRAND RASSEMBLEMENT DES ARTISANS DU SENEGAL": "GRAND RASSEMBLEMENT DES ARTISANS DU SENEGAL", "SOPI SENEGAL": "SOPI SENEGAL"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 54, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:52:40.158130", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.487, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.605, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.605, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.461, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.487, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.605, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.424, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.153, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.966, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.51, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.378, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.461, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.461, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.443, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.674, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 54}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a0b8728eb0694a71b3fe4cf97a47bf0f", "name": "Mozambique 2024 parliamentary (overnight mozambique_2024_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mozambique", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://university.open.ac.uk/technology/mozambique/sites/www.open.ac.uk.technology.mozambique/files/files/Resultados%20Eleitorais%202024(1).pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"MDM": "MDM", "FRELIMO": "FRELIMO", "RENAMO": "RENAMO", "PVM": "PVM", "MJRD": "MJRD", "MPD": "MPD", "PARENA": "PARENA", "PT": "PT", "PARESO": "PARESO", "UNAMO": "UNAMO", "PAREDE": "PAREDE", "RD": "RD", "UM": "UM", "ND": "ND", "PEC_MT": "PEC_MT", "PODEMOS": "PODEMOS", "PUN": "PUN", "PADELIMO": "PADELIMO", "UDM": "UDM", "MRM": "MRM", "PEMO": "PEMO", "PANAOC": "PANAOC", "PAHUMO": "PAHUMO", "PPD": "PPD", "PLD": "PLD", "PJDM": "PJDM", "MONARUMO": "MONARUMO", "PDD": "PDD", "PPPM": "PPPM", "PRDS": "PRDS", "PASOMO": "PASOMO", "PDM": "PDM", "CDU": "CDU", "PANAMO_CRD": "PANAMO_CRD", "AMUSI": "AMUSI"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13, "granularity": "province", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:52:39.929370", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.054, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.31, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.189, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.054, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.264, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.574, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.221, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.364, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.091, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.087, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.272, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.31, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.31, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.189, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.189, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.2, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.2, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.488, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.567, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.567, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.698, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.698, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.52, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.52, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 13}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "eb3aa369efb24588a2310a406c82d2b5", "name": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 2025 parliamentary (overnight st_vincent_2025_general.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electoral.gov.vc/electoral/images/PDF/results/2025_results/Election_2025_Final_Results_2.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ulp": "ulp", "ndp": "ndp", "independent": "independent"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 250, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:16:41.248112", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 250}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "088351e3faf34c18b9eb239b5399bfc2", "name": "Ecuador 2025 referendum (overnight ecuador_2025_referendum_constituyente.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Ecuador", "year": 2025, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.cne.gob.ec/download/referendum-y-consulta-popular-2025/?wpdmdl=62026", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_si": "votes_si", "votes_no": "votes_no"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2604, "granularity": "parish", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 696}, "n_stations_flagged": 696, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:16:33.364419", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.345, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.942, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.607, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.386, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.345, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.798, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.989, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.747, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.403, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.798, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.45, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.386, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.386, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.268, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.268, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.692, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.487, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.487, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.652, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.706, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2604}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f0cacb4135b84b9f905615972bf4efee", "name": "Cameroon 2025 presidential (overnight cameroon_2025_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cameroon", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://fr.journalducameroun.com/presidentielle-2025-au-cameroun-voici-lensemble-des-resultats-du-scrutin-proclames-par-le-conseil-constitutionnel/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ateki_seta_caxton": "ateki_seta_caxton", "bello_bouba_maigari": "bello_bouba_maigari", "biya_paul": "biya_paul", "bougha_hagbe_jacques": "bougha_hagbe_jacques", "issa_tchiroma_bakary": "issa_tchiroma_bakary", "iyodi_hiram_samuel": "iyodi_hiram_samuel", "kwemo_pierre": "kwemo_pierre", "libii_li_ngue_cabral": "libii_li_ngue_cabral", "matomba_serge_espoir": "matomba_serge_espoir", "muna_akere_tabeng": "muna_akere_tabeng", "osih_joshua_nambangi": "osih_joshua_nambangi", "tomaino_ndam_njoya": "tomaino_ndam_njoya"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": "region", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:16:33.064294", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.804, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.856, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.26, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.114, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.161, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.29, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.546, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.137, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.41, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.102, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.215, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.076, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.269, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.26, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.26, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.114, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.178, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.178, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.509, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.509, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.111, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.111, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.939, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.532, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.532, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 11}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f198cc3081604ed4abd7835a3f5c27a0", "name": "Gabon 2025 presidential (overnight gabon_2025_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Gabon", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://journal-officiel.ga/21807-028-cct-/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"bilie_by_nze_alain_claude": "bilie_by_nze_alain_claude", "boungoueres_alain_simplice": "boungoueres_alain_simplice", "essingone_joseph_lapensee": "essingone_joseph_lapensee", "gninga_chaning_zenaba": "gninga_chaning_zenaba", "ibinga_ibinga_axel_stophene": "ibinga_ibinga_axel_stophene", "iloko_boussengui_stephane_germain": "iloko_boussengui_stephane_germain", "ngoma_thierry_yvon_michel": "ngoma_thierry_yvon_michel", "oligui_nguema_brice_clotaire": "oligui_nguema_brice_clotaire"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "province", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:16:32.901483", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.756, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.834, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.302, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.178, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.756, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.194, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.298, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.543, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.386, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.221, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.305, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.302, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.302, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.178, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.178, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.788, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.266, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.266, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.72, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.72, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.748, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.748, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "971b4d16db984242a0d828cb19b673db", "name": "Comoros 2025 parliamentary (overnight comoros_2025_legislative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Comoros", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89lections_l%C3%A9gislatives_comoriennes_de_2025 (mirror of Cour Supreme Decision N.25-006/CS 2025-01-22 + N.25-023/CS 2025-02-06, cenivotecomores.com PDFs now 404)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"crc": "crc", "orange": "orange", "pari": "pari", "rdce": "rdce", "twamaya": "twamaya", "swauti": "swauti", "independent": "independent"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 33, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 28}, "n_stations_flagged": 28, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:16:32.665562", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.725, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.485, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.293, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.132, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.725, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.485, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.675, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.419, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.238, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.667, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.167, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.448, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.362, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.566, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.293, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.293, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.132, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.132, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.222, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.222, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.476, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.476, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.186, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.498, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.498, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 33}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bd12861720394f18848cc3db78b9046d", "name": "Suriname 2025 parliamentary (overnight suriname_2025_national_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Suriname", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://verkiezingen.gov.sr/ -> official preliminary-results PowerBI dashboard https://app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiY2ZlYTg4MjEtMzI4Yy00ODI3LThkMTQtZDBhYmM3N2E4YTkzIiwidCI6IjNmOGFhYzQ1LTU4N2MtNDgyZS04OTcwLTc3YTRjNDNkNDk4OCJ9 (queried via wabi-paas-1-scus-api.analysis.windows.net public querydata A", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"A20": "A20", "ABOP": "ABOP", "APP": "APP", "BEP": "BEP", "DA91": "DA91", "DNL": "DNL", "DUS": "DUS", "NDP": "NDP", "NPS": "NPS", "OPTSU": "OPTSU", "PL": "PL", "PVC": "PVC", "VHP": "VHP", "VLS2023": "VLS2023"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 673, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 319}, "n_stations_flagged": 319, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:16:30.520056", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.812, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.755, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.781, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.626, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.812, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.755, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.872, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.055, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.274, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.436, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.626, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.626, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.6, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.172, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 673}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "57c7423bb5484115aa7ac1a006bfe693", "name": "Trinidad and Tobago 2025 parliamentary (overnight trinidad_tobago_2025_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Trinidad and Tobago", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ebctt.com/wp-content/uploads/PE2025_Prelim_Election_Results_Detailed.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"APP": "APP", "CARM": "CARM", "COP": "COP", "HM": "HM", "IDA": "IDA", "MND": "MND", "NCT": "NCT", "NNV": "NNV", "NTA": "NTA", "PDP": "PDP", "PEP": "PEP", "PF": "PF", "PNM": "PNM", "THC": "THC", "TPP": "TPP", "UNC": "UNC", "UP": "UP", "IND_L_George": "IND_L_George", "IND_V_Johnson": "IND_V_Johnson", "IND_E_Singh": "IND_E_Singh"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 41, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:16:30.210416", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.897, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.914, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.786, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.668, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.257, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.467, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.314, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.109, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.786, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.668, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.888, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.1, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.1, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.888, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 41}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "af3d9bc3d3d64bfc96206bcb611e5a6e", "name": "Jamaica 2025 parliamentary (overnight jamaica_2025_general.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Jamaica", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.ecj.com.jm/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/2025-General-Election-Summary-Results-1.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"JLP": "JLP", "PNP": "PNP", "JPP": "JPP", "UIC": "UIC", "IND_A": "IND_A", "IND_B": "IND_B"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 63, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:16:29.845613", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.861, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.805, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.679, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.352, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.731, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.814, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.679, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.679, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.658, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.876, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.207, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.207, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.919, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 63}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2fa3a10fe57645438c2f801e59b42772", "name": "Ireland 2025 presidential (overnight ireland_2025_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Ireland", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.presidentialelection.ie/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Presidential-Elections-1938-2025.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"connolly_catherine_ind": "connolly_catherine_ind", "gavin_jim_ff": "gavin_jim_ff", "humphreys_heather_fg": "humphreys_heather_fg"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 43, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:16:29.577286", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.831, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.887, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.822, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.766, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.269, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.067, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.887, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.032, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.032, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 43}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "15f8dfb1696e42378f66c3d60bc798af", "name": "South Korea 2026 local (overnight southkorea_2026_local_governors.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 2026, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://info.nec.go.kr/main/showDocument.xhtml?electionId=0020260603&topMenuId=VC&secondMenuId=VCCP08", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_dp": "votes_dp", "votes_gukminyeonhap": "votes_gukminyeonhap", "votes_ind_kim_gwangman": "votes_ind_kim_gwangman", "votes_ind_kim_kwanyoung": "votes_ind_kim_kwanyoung", "votes_ind_kim_sungsoo": "votes_ind_kim_sungsoo", "votes_ind_park_maengwoo": "votes_ind_park_maengwoo", "votes_ind_yang_yunnyeong": "votes_ind_yang_yunnyeong", "votes_justice": "votes_justice", "votes_ppp": "votes_ppp", "votes_progressive": "votes_progressive", "votes_reform": "votes_reform", "votes_womens": "votes_womens"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7884, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 256, "cast_gt_registered": 258}, "n_stations_flagged": 264, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:16:00.573711", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.89, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.819, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.739, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.837, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.707, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.585, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.159, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.04, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.739, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.872, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.156, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.156, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7884}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "745e636956fb4872a0b707a18ce64c11", "name": "Colombia 2026 parliamentary (overnight colombia_2026_senate.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2026, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://huggingface.co/datasets/AprendeIngenia/votai-colombia-2026-electoral-aggregates (data/interim/m2_transfer_leg/senate_party_wide.parquet; CC-BY-4.0 mirror of Registraduria escrutinio MMV per-mesa CSVs, 2026-03-08 Congreso; original portal resultados.registraduria.gov.co /json/ACT/SE/ now offl", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"acmizsam": "acmizsam", "ahora_colombia": "ahora_colombia", "alianza_por_colombia": "alianza_por_colombia", "asociacion_de_autoridades_tradicionales_indigenas": "asociacion_de_autoridades_tradicionales_indigenas", "asociacion_de_cabildos_indigenas_por_colombia": "asociacion_de_cabildos_indigenas_por_colombia", "asociacion_nacional_indigena_de_colombia_anic": "asociacion_nacional_indigena_de_colombia_anic", "cabildo_indegena_tevis": "cabildo_indegena_tevis", "cabildo_indigena_tevis": "cabildo_indigena_tevis", "coalicion_cambio_radical_alma": "coalicion_cambio_radical_alma", "coalicion_fuerza_ciudadana": "coalicion_fuerza_ciudadana", "colombia_segura_y_prospera": "colombia_segura_y_prospera", "creemos": "creemos", "frente_amplio_unitario": "frente_amplio_unitario", "la_lista_de_oviedo_con_toda_por_colombia": "la_lista_de_oviedo_con_toda_por_colombia", "movimiento_alternativo_indigena_y_social_mais": "movimiento_alternativo_indigena_y_social_mais", "movimiento_autoridades_indigenas_de_colombia_aico": "movimiento_autoridades_indigenas_de_colombia_aico", "movimiento_salvacion_nacional": "movimiento_salvacion_nacional", "movimiento_si": "movimiento_si", "movimiento_unidad_en_minga_por_colombia": "movimiento_unidad_en_minga_por_colombia", "pacto_historico_senado": "pacto_historico_senado", "partido_centro_democratico": "partido_centro_democratico", "partido_conservador_colombiano": "partido_conservador_colombiano", "partido_de_la_union_por_la_gente_partido_de_la_u": "partido_de_la_union_por_la_gente_partido_de_la_u", "partido_liberal_colombiano": "partido_liberal_colombiano", "partido_politico_oxigeno": "partido_politico_oxigeno", "patriotas": "patriotas", "trietnico_gobernativo_trigo": "trietnico_gobernativo_trigo"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 126467, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 126467, "cast_gt_registered": 126467}, "n_stations_flagged": 126467, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:09:03.760486", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.679, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.555, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.679, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.679, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.405, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.405, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.388, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 126467}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8cc820f33b1747f7bd1c65531518a06f", "name": "Nepal 2026 parliamentary (overnight nepal_2026_hor_fptp.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Nepal", "year": 2026, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://result.election.gov.np/Handlers/SecureJson.ashx?file=JSONFiles/Election2082/HOR/FPTP/HOR-{district}-{const}.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u092e\u094d\u092f\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 (\u090f\u0915\u0940\u0915\u0943\u0924 \u092e\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u094d\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u0932\u0947\u0928\u093f\u0928\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940)": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u092e\u094d\u092f\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 (\u090f\u0915\u0940\u0915\u0943\u0924 \u092e\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u094d\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u0932\u0947\u0928\u093f\u0928\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940)", "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 \u0915\u093e\u0901\u0917\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0938": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 \u0915\u093e\u0901\u0917\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0938", "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 \u0915\u092e\u094d\u092f\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 \u0915\u092e\u094d\u092f\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0936\u094d\u0930\u092e \u0938\u0902\u0938\u094d\u0915\u0943\u0924\u093f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0936\u094d\u0930\u092e \u0938\u0902\u0938\u094d\u0915\u0943\u0924\u093f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0909\u091c\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0932\u094b \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0909\u091c\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0932\u094b \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u0902\u0918\u0940\u092f \u0932\u094b\u0915\u0924\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u092e\u091e\u094d\u091a": "\u0938\u0902\u0918\u0940\u092f \u0932\u094b\u0915\u0924\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u092e\u091e\u094d\u091a", "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u091c\u093e\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u091c\u093e\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u092e\u094d\u092f\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0938\u094d\u091f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 (\u092e\u093e\u0913\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940)": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u092e\u094d\u092f\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0938\u094d\u091f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 (\u092e\u093e\u0913\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940)", "\u091c\u0928\u0924\u093e \u0938\u092e\u093e\u091c\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940(\u090f\u0915\u0932 \u091a\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0935 \u091a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0939)": "\u091c\u0928\u0924\u093e \u0938\u092e\u093e\u091c\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940(\u090f\u0915\u0932 \u091a\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0935 \u091a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0939)", "\u091c\u0928\u0924\u093e \u0938\u092e\u093e\u091c\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940, \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932": "\u091c\u0928\u0924\u093e \u0938\u092e\u093e\u091c\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940, \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "\u092e\u0902\u0917\u094b\u0932 \u0928\u0947\u0936\u0928\u0932 \u0905\u0930\u094d\u0917\u0928\u093e\u0907\u091c\u0947\u0938\u0928": "\u092e\u0902\u0917\u094b\u0932 \u0928\u0947\u0936\u0928\u0932 \u0905\u0930\u094d\u0917\u0928\u093e\u0907\u091c\u0947\u0938\u0928", "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u091c\u0928\u092e\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u091c\u0928\u092e\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u0938\u093e\u091d\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u0938\u093e\u091d\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u0902\u092f\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0924 \u0928\u093e\u0917\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0938\u0902\u092f\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0924 \u0928\u093e\u0917\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342390_\u0938\u0941\u092c\u093e\u0938 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0915\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342390_\u0938\u0941\u092c\u093e\u0938 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0915\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 \u091c\u0928\u0936\u094d\u0930\u092e\u0926\u093e\u0928 \u0938\u0902\u0938\u094d\u0915\u0943\u0924\u093f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 \u091c\u0928\u0936\u094d\u0930\u092e\u0926\u093e\u0928 \u0938\u0902\u0938\u094d\u0915\u0943\u0924\u093f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339515_\u0926\u0947\u0909\u092e\u093e\u0928 \u0932\u093f\u092e\u094d\u092c\u0941": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339515_\u0926\u0947\u0909\u092e\u093e\u0928 \u0932\u093f\u092e\u094d\u092c\u0941", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342710_\u0938\u0941\u092e\u093f\u0924 \u0930\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342710_\u0938\u0941\u092e\u093f\u0924 \u0930\u093e\u0908", "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u092e\u091c\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u093f\u0938\u093e\u0928 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u092e\u091c\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u093f\u0938\u093e\u0928 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0906\u092e \u091c\u0928\u0924\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940(\u090f\u0915\u0932 \u091a\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0935 \u091a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0939)": "\u0906\u092e \u091c\u0928\u0924\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940(\u090f\u0915\u0932 \u091a\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0935 \u091a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0939)", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342657_\u091c\u093f\u0935\u0928 \u0915\u0932\u093e \u0930\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342657_\u091c\u093f\u0935\u0928 \u0915\u0932\u093e \u0930\u093e\u0908", "\u092e\u093f\u0924\u0947\u0930\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932": "\u092e\u093f\u0924\u0947\u0930\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342257_\u0936\u0947\u0937 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0930\u0947\u0917\u094d\u092e\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342257_\u0936\u0947\u0937 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0930\u0947\u0917\u094d\u092e\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342697_\u091a\u0947\u0924 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342697_\u091a\u0947\u0924 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342086_\u0913\u092e \u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0909\u0926\u093e\u0938": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342086_\u0913\u092e \u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0909\u0926\u093e\u0938", "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930 \u0928\u093f\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e\u0923 \u0926\u0932 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932": "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930 \u0928\u093f\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e\u0923 \u0926\u0932 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "\u091c\u0928\u092e\u0924 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u091c\u0928\u092e\u0924 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0917\u0924\u093f\u0936\u0940\u0932 \u0932\u094b\u0915\u0924\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0917\u0924\u093f\u0936\u0940\u0932 \u0932\u094b\u0915\u0924\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u092e\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932(\u090f\u0915\u0932 \u091a\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0935 \u091a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0939)": "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u092e\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932(\u090f\u0915\u0932 \u091a\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0935 \u091a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0939)", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340073_\u0907\u092b\u0924\u0916\u093e\u0930 \u0939\u0938\u0928 (\u0907\u0915\u0935\u093e\u0932)": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340073_\u0907\u092b\u0924\u0916\u093e\u0930 \u0939\u0938\u0928 (\u0907\u0915\u0935\u093e\u0932)", "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0932\u094b\u0915\u0924\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0932\u094b\u0915\u0924\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342461_\u0928\u0935\u0930\u093e\u091c \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342461_\u0928\u0935\u0930\u093e\u091c \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932", "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u092e\u094d\u092f\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 (\u0938\u0902\u092f\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0924)": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u092e\u094d\u092f\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 (\u0938\u0902\u092f\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0924)", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342336_\u0926\u0947\u0935\u0947\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342336_\u0926\u0947\u0935\u0947\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342576_\u0905\u0928\u094d\u091c\u0928\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0917\u0941\u092a\u094d\u0924\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342576_\u0905\u0928\u094d\u091c\u0928\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0917\u0941\u092a\u094d\u0924\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341814_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0916\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341814_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0916\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342031_\u0938\u0924\u094d\u092f \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092a\u0902\u0921\u093f\u0924": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342031_\u0938\u0924\u094d\u092f \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092a\u0902\u0921\u093f\u0924", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342681_\u0921\u092e\u094d\u200d\u092c\u0930 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092c\u0930\u093e\u0907\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342681_\u0921\u092e\u094d\u200d\u092c\u0930 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092c\u0930\u093e\u0907\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341975_\u092d\u0940\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0926\u093e\u0939\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341975_\u092d\u0940\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0926\u093e\u0939\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342597_\u0930\u094b\u0938\u0928\u0940 \u0930\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342597_\u0930\u094b\u0938\u0928\u0940 \u0930\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0935\u092d\u094c\u092e \u0928\u093e\u0917\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0938\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0935\u092d\u094c\u092e \u0928\u093e\u0917\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0935\u0947\u0936\u0940 \u0938\u092e\u093e\u091c\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0935\u0947\u0936\u0940 \u0938\u092e\u093e\u091c\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "\u0928\u093e\u0917\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u0909\u0928\u094d\u092e\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940, \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932(\u090f\u0915\u0932 \u091a\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0935 \u091a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0939)": "\u0928\u093e\u0917\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u0909\u0928\u094d\u092e\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940, \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932(\u090f\u0915\u0932 \u091a\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0935 \u091a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0939)", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341053_\u0915\u093e\u0938\u0928\u0940 \u0925\u0930\u0941\u0928\u093f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341053_\u0915\u093e\u0938\u0928\u0940 \u0925\u0930\u0941\u0928\u093f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340689_\u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0909\u0930\u093e\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340689_\u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0909\u0930\u093e\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341835_\u091a\u0940\u0924 \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341835_\u091a\u0940\u0924 \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342177_\u0936\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0941\u0921\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342177_\u0936\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0941\u0921\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341015_\u0938\u0941\u092e\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341015_\u0938\u0941\u092e\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342399_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0917\u094c\u0924\u092e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342399_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0917\u094c\u0924\u092e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340832_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u092a\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0941\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340832_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u092a\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0941\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342287_\u092e\u094b. \u0924\u091c\u092e\u0941\u0932 \u092e\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0901": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342287_\u092e\u094b. \u0924\u091c\u092e\u0941\u0932 \u092e\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0901", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340663_\u0930\u094b\u091c\u0928 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0915\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340663_\u0930\u094b\u091c\u0928 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0915\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340945_\u092e\u094b \u0917\u0941\u0932\u093e\u092c \u0905\u0902\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340945_\u092e\u094b \u0917\u0941\u0932\u093e\u092c \u0905\u0902\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u091c\u0928\u0924\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u091c\u0928\u0924\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341610_\u0905\u0902\u0915\u0940\u0924  \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940 ": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341610_\u0905\u0902\u0915\u0940\u0924  \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940 ", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342027_\u0924\u0947\u091c \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0917\u094b\u0908\u0924 ": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342027_\u0924\u0947\u091c \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0917\u094b\u0908\u0924 ", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342248_\u0915\u0941\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0928 \u0915\u094c\u0938\u093f\u0915": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342248_\u0915\u0941\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0928 \u0915\u094c\u0938\u093f\u0915", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341481_\u0909\u092a\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341481_\u0909\u092a\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341423_\u0926\u0947\u0935 \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341423_\u0926\u0947\u0935 \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341281_\u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e\u0928\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926 \u0916\u0924\u093f\u0935\u0921\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341281_\u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e\u0928\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926 \u0916\u0924\u093f\u0935\u0921\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341829_\u092e\u0939\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0938\u0941\u0928\u091a\u093e\u0948\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341829_\u092e\u0939\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0938\u0941\u0928\u091a\u093e\u0948\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341571_\u091c\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092e\u093f\u092f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341571_\u091c\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092e\u093f\u092f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342202_\u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0940 \u092e\u0941\u0916\u093f\u092f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342202_\u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0940 \u092e\u0941\u0916\u093f\u092f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341061_\u092f\u092e\u0941\u0928\u093e \u0915\u0947.\u0938\u0940.": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341061_\u092f\u092e\u0941\u0928\u093e \u0915\u0947.\u0938\u0940.", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342404_\u092b\u0941\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0916\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342404_\u092b\u0941\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0916\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342181_\u092c\u0941\u0927\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342181_\u092c\u0941\u0927\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u092a\u0930\u093f\u0935\u0930\u094d\u0924\u0928 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u092a\u0930\u093f\u0935\u0930\u094d\u0924\u0928 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341259_\u0924\u093f\u0932\u0915 \u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341259_\u0924\u093f\u0932\u0915 \u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341731_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341731_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0935\u0947\u0936\u0940 \u0938\u092e\u093e\u091c\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0935\u0947\u0936\u0940 \u0938\u092e\u093e\u091c\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u091c\u0928\u092e\u094b\u0930\u094d\u091a\u093e": "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u091c\u0928\u092e\u094b\u0930\u094d\u091a\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339634_\u092c\u093f\u0915\u094d\u0930\u092e \u0926\u093e\u0939\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339634_\u092c\u093f\u0915\u094d\u0930\u092e \u0926\u093e\u0939\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342604_\u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0915\u093e\u091c\u0940 \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919\u094d\u0917": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342604_\u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0915\u093e\u091c\u0940 \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919\u094d\u0917", "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 \u091c\u0928\u0924\u093e \u0926\u0932": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 \u091c\u0928\u0924\u093e \u0926\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339766_\u0926\u0947\u0935\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0930\u094b\u0915\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339766_\u0926\u0947\u0935\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0930\u094b\u0915\u093e", "\u0928\u093e\u0917\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u0938\u0930\u094d\u0935\u094b\u091a\u094d\u091a\u0924\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932(\u090f\u0915\u0932 \u091a\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0935 \u091a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0939)": "\u0928\u093e\u0917\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u0938\u0930\u094d\u0935\u094b\u091a\u094d\u091a\u0924\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932(\u090f\u0915\u0932 \u091a\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0935 \u091a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0939)", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342072_\u092e\u0947\u091c\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342072_\u092e\u0947\u091c\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u093e\u092d\u093f\u092e\u093e\u0928 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u093e\u092d\u093f\u092e\u093e\u0928 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u091c\u0928\u0924\u093e \u0938\u0902\u0930\u0915\u094d\u0937\u0923 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u091c\u0928\u0924\u093e \u0938\u0902\u0930\u0915\u094d\u0937\u0923 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341448_\u091c\u0917\u0926\u0947\u0935 \u0938\u0926\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341448_\u091c\u0917\u0926\u0947\u0935 \u0938\u0926\u093e", "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u090f\u0915\u0924\u093e \u0926\u0932": "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u090f\u0915\u0924\u093e \u0926\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342120_\u092e\u094b \u0905\u092e\u093f\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342120_\u092e\u094b \u0905\u092e\u093f\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341850_\u0930\u093f\u091c\u0935\u093e\u0928\u093e \u0916\u093e\u0924\u0941\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341850_\u0930\u093f\u091c\u0935\u093e\u0928\u093e \u0916\u093e\u0924\u0941\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340064_\u0938\u0902\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340064_\u0938\u0902\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341008_\u0909\u092e\u094d\u0926\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0938\u0926\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341008_\u0909\u092e\u094d\u0926\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0938\u0926\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340284_\u0932\u0947\u0916\u0928\u093e\u0925 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340284_\u0932\u0947\u0916\u0928\u093e\u0925 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342366_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0916\u0919": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342366_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0916\u0919", "\u091c\u0928 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u091c\u0928 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341291_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094b\u0937 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u091c\u0915": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341291_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094b\u0937 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u091c\u0915", "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0915\u093e \u0932\u093e\u0917\u093f \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0915\u093e \u0932\u093e\u0917\u093f \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340597_\u0935\u093f\u0936\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340597_\u0935\u093f\u0936\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u091c\u0928\u0924\u093e \u0932\u094b\u0915\u0924\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940, \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932": "\u091c\u0928\u0924\u093e \u0932\u094b\u0915\u0924\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940, \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341429_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094b\u0926\u093e\u0928\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u091d\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341429_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094b\u0926\u093e\u0928\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u091d\u093e", "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0938\u0902\u0918\u0940\u092f \u0938\u092e\u093e\u091c\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940(\u090f\u0915\u0932 \u091a\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0935 \u091a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0939)": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0938\u0902\u0918\u0940\u092f \u0938\u092e\u093e\u091c\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940(\u090f\u0915\u0932 \u091a\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0935 \u091a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0939)", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340126_\u091c\u093f\u0924\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340126_\u091c\u093f\u0924\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340412_\u092a\u093e\u0930\u0936\u092e\u0923\u093f \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340412_\u092a\u093e\u0930\u0936\u092e\u0923\u093f \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341584_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092c\u093f\u0932\u093e\u0938 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341584_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092c\u093f\u0932\u093e\u0938 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342323_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0941 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342323_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0941 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341666_\u0915\u093f\u0938\u0941\u0928\u0926\u0947\u0935 \u0930\u093e\u092e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341666_\u0915\u093f\u0938\u0941\u0928\u0926\u0947\u0935 \u0930\u093e\u092e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341880_\u0905\u092e\u094d\u200d\u0935\u093f\u0915\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0938\u093e\u092b\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341880_\u0905\u092e\u094d\u200d\u0935\u093f\u0915\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0938\u093e\u092b\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339917_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u092e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339917_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u092e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341488_\u0938\u0941\u0936\u0940\u0932\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341488_\u0938\u0941\u0936\u0940\u0932\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341331_\u0938\u0902\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341331_\u0938\u0902\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342275_\u0938\u093e\u0927\u0928\u093e  \u0926\u093e\u0938 ": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342275_\u0938\u093e\u0927\u0928\u093e  \u0926\u093e\u0938 ", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341946_\u0905\u092d\u093f\u0928\u093e\u0937 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341946_\u0905\u092d\u093f\u0928\u093e\u0937 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340814_\u0938\u0930\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340814_\u0938\u0930\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u092c\u0939\u0941\u091c\u0928 \u090f\u0915\u0924\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932(\u090f\u0915\u0932 \u091a\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0935 \u091a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0939)": "\u092c\u0939\u0941\u091c\u0928 \u090f\u0915\u0924\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932(\u090f\u0915\u0932 \u091a\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0935 \u091a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0939)", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340727_\u0915\u094b\u0936\u093f\u0932\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340727_\u0915\u094b\u0936\u093f\u0932\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341125_\u0939\u0930\u0940 \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341125_\u0939\u0930\u0940 \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342044_\u0915\u094c\u0936\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342044_\u0915\u094c\u0936\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340792_\u0926\u0941\u0935\u0940 \u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340792_\u0926\u0941\u0935\u0940 \u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341294_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u092d\u0941 \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341294_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u092d\u0941 \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340859_\u0930\u091c\u093f\u092f\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0938\u0926\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340859_\u0930\u091c\u093f\u092f\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0938\u0926\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341669_\u0913\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0915\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341669_\u0913\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0915\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342111_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094b\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0902\u0921\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342111_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094b\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0902\u0921\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340314_\u0938\u0902\u0924\u094b\u0937 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340314_\u0938\u0902\u0924\u094b\u0937 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341961_\u0936\u093f\u0935 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u092a\u0948\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341961_\u0936\u093f\u0935 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u092a\u0948\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341870_\u0938\u0902\u091c\u0940\u0935 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341870_\u0938\u0902\u091c\u0940\u0935 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341587_\u0936\u094d\u200d\u092f\u093e\u092e\u0938\u0941\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939\u0941": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341587_\u0936\u094d\u200d\u092f\u093e\u092e\u0938\u0941\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939\u0941", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340495_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u092e\u0902\u0921\u0932 \u0927\u093e\u0928\u0941\u0915": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340495_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u092e\u0902\u0921\u0932 \u0927\u093e\u0928\u0941\u0915", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341192_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u092e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341192_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u092e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341222_\u0926\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0917\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341222_\u0926\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0917\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340535_\u0938\u0928\u092e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940 ": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340535_\u0938\u0928\u092e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940 ", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340426_\u0938\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340426_\u0938\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341519_\u0915\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930  \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926  \u0938\u093e\u0939 ": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341519_\u0915\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930  \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926  \u0938\u093e\u0939 ", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342186_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094b\u0937 \u0938\u093f\u0932\u0935\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342186_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094b\u0937 \u0938\u093f\u0932\u0935\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341147_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u092f\u093e\u0917 \u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341147_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u092f\u093e\u0917 \u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342269_\u0926\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0917\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342269_\u0926\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0917\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340678_\u092a\u0902\u0915\u091c \u0917\u094b\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u093e\u092e\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340678_\u092a\u0902\u0915\u091c \u0917\u094b\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u093e\u092e\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341493_\u0906\u0936\u093f\u0937 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341493_\u0906\u0936\u093f\u0937 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342311_\u0930\u093e\u092e  \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930  \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b ": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342311_\u0930\u093e\u092e  \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930  \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b ", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341690_\u0906\u0928\u094d\u0928\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341690_\u0906\u0928\u094d\u0928\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342000_\u092d\u094b\u0932\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342000_\u092d\u094b\u0932\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342659_\u0938\u0941\u0932\u094b\u091a\u0928\u093e \u0915\u0941\u0936\u094d\u092e\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342659_\u0938\u0941\u0932\u094b\u091a\u0928\u093e \u0915\u0941\u0936\u094d\u092e\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342519_\u0926\u093f\u0928\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342519_\u0926\u093f\u0928\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341314_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341314_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341816_\u0905\u0936\u093f\u0937 \u0932\u093e\u0932 \u0926\u093e\u0938": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341816_\u0905\u0936\u093f\u0937 \u0932\u093e\u0932 \u0926\u093e\u0938", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341401_\u091c\u0941\u0917\u093e\u0908 \u092e\u0902\u0921\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341401_\u091c\u0941\u0917\u093e\u0908 \u092e\u0902\u0921\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342396_\u0907\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0926\u0947\u0935 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342396_\u0907\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0926\u0947\u0935 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341173_\u0928\u093e\u0917\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341173_\u0928\u093e\u0917\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342075_\u0936\u094d\u0930\u0940 \u0928\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u0938\u093e\u092b\u0940 \u0927\u094b\u0935\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342075_\u0936\u094d\u0930\u0940 \u0928\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u0938\u093e\u092b\u0940 \u0927\u094b\u0935\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342371_\u0935\u093e\u0932\u0947\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0930 \u0926\u093e\u0938 \u0924\u0924\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342371_\u0935\u093e\u0932\u0947\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0930 \u0926\u093e\u0938 \u0924\u0924\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340795_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u0926\u0947\u0935 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340795_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u0926\u0947\u0935 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340991_\u0915\u092a\u0932\u0947\u0936\u0935\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340991_\u0915\u092a\u0932\u0947\u0936\u0935\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341489_\u0935\u093f\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341489_\u0935\u093f\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341954_\u0905\u0928\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341954_\u0905\u0928\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341548_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341548_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341129_\u0936\u093f\u0935 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u092e\u0948\u0924": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341129_\u0936\u093f\u0935 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u092e\u0948\u0924", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342090_\u091c\u092f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0938 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342090_\u091c\u092f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0938 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341590_\u0930\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341590_\u0930\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340748_\u0909\u0937\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340748_\u0909\u0937\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342149_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0917\u0923\u0947\u0936 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342149_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0917\u0923\u0947\u0936 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342047_\u0909\u0926\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0917\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342047_\u0909\u0926\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0917\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340849_\u0930\u093e\u091c  \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930  \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940 ": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340849_\u0930\u093e\u091c  \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930  \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940 ", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341919_\u0930\u094b\u0935\u093f\u0928 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341919_\u0930\u094b\u0935\u093f\u0928 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341979_\u0930\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341979_\u0930\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340647_\u0936\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u0940 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340647_\u0936\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u0940 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342298_\u0915\u092a\u0932\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930\u0940 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342298_\u0915\u092a\u0932\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930\u0940 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340779_\u0926\u093f\u0932\u0940\u092a \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340779_\u0926\u093f\u0932\u0940\u092a \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340636_\u0905\u0930\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340636_\u0905\u0930\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341630_\u092c\u0948\u091c\u0928\u093e\u0925 \u0915\u093e\u092e\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341630_\u092c\u0948\u091c\u0928\u093e\u0925 \u0915\u093e\u092e\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341254_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u091a\u0930\u093f\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341254_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u091a\u0930\u093f\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341551_\u0909\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092c\u0930\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341551_\u0909\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092c\u0930\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341207_\u0905\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0941\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341207_\u0905\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0941\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341847_\u0905\u0936\u093f\u0937 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341847_\u0905\u0936\u093f\u0937 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342467_\u0907\u0928\u094d\u0926\u093f\u0932\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342467_\u0907\u0928\u094d\u0926\u093f\u0932\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342142_\u0938\u094b\u092d\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342142_\u0938\u094b\u092d\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342621_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342621_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340977_\u0926\u093f\u0928\u0947\u0936 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340977_\u0926\u093f\u0928\u0947\u0936 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341599_\u092c\u093f\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u092e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341599_\u092c\u093f\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u092e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342665_\u0928\u0935\u093f\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342665_\u0928\u0935\u093f\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342647_\u092c\u092c\u094d\u0932\u0941 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342647_\u092c\u092c\u094d\u0932\u0941 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341944_\u0905\u0902\u0915\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341944_\u0905\u0902\u0915\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342195_\u0926\u0941\u0937\u094d\u092f\u0928\u094d\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u0930\u094d\u0923": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342195_\u0926\u0941\u0937\u094d\u092f\u0928\u094d\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u0930\u094d\u0923", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341511_\u0906\u0928\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0915\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341511_\u0906\u0928\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0915\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342575_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u094d\u092f \u0926\u0947\u0935 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342575_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u094d\u092f \u0926\u0947\u0935 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342104_\u0938\u0947. \u091c\u0939\u0941\u0930 -": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342104_\u0938\u0947. \u091c\u0939\u0941\u0930 -", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341676_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092a\u0941\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u092e\u0924\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341676_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092a\u0941\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u092e\u0924\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341808_\u0930\u093e\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341808_\u0930\u093e\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341378_\u0926\u0940\u092a\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341378_\u0926\u0940\u092a\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342680_\u0930\u092e\u0947\u0936\u091a\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342680_\u0930\u092e\u0947\u0936\u091a\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341034_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0926\u093f\u092a \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341034_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0926\u093f\u092a \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342728_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342728_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341117_\u0938\u0941\u092e\u093f\u0924 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341117_\u0938\u0941\u092e\u093f\u0924 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340942_\u091c\u093f\u0935\u091b \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340942_\u091c\u093f\u0935\u091b \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341884_\u092e\u0928\u094d\u091a\u0928 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341884_\u092e\u0928\u094d\u091a\u0928 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341083_\u0938\u0924\u0940\u0936 \u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341083_\u0938\u0924\u0940\u0936 \u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342261_\u092d\u0930\u0924 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342261_\u092d\u0930\u0924 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u092c\u0939\u0941\u091c\u0928 \u0936\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u092c\u0939\u0941\u091c\u0928 \u0936\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342709_\u092e\u094b \u0930\u094d\u0907\u0935\u0930\u093e\u0907\u0928 \u0905\u0928\u094d\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342709_\u092e\u094b \u0930\u094d\u0907\u0935\u0930\u093e\u0907\u0928 \u0905\u0928\u094d\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342497_\u0930\u0941\u092a\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342497_\u0930\u0941\u092a\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340180_\u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930\u0940 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340180_\u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930\u0940 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341122_\u092b\u0941\u0932\u0926\u0947\u0935 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930 \u0939\u091c\u093e\u092e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341122_\u092b\u0941\u0932\u0926\u0947\u0935 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930 \u0939\u091c\u093e\u092e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342733_\u0915\u0941\u0936\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939 \u0938\u0941\u0921\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342733_\u0915\u0941\u0936\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939 \u0938\u0941\u0921\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341029_\u0906\u0928\u093f\u0932 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341029_\u0906\u0928\u093f\u0932 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342773_\u0930\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342773_\u0930\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340733_\u0935\u093f\u0938\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340733_\u0935\u093f\u0938\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341185_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094b\u0937 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341185_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094b\u0937 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342698_\u0928\u0925\u0941\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e \u0938\u0926\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342698_\u0928\u0925\u0941\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e \u0938\u0926\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342760_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0926\u0947\u0935 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342760_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0926\u0947\u0935 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342750_\u0909\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u092e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342750_\u0909\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u092e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342211_\u0915\u093e\u092e\u0947\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0930 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342211_\u0915\u093e\u092e\u0947\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0930 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342316_\u0915\u0947\u0926\u093e\u0930 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0915\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342316_\u0915\u0947\u0926\u093e\u0930 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0915\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341799_\u0927\u0928\u0935\u0940\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u092a\u0948\u0930 \u0915\u0947\u0935\u091f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341799_\u0927\u0928\u0935\u0940\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u092a\u0948\u0930 \u0915\u0947\u0935\u091f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342124_\u0938\u0941\u0936\u093f\u0932  \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930  \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342124_\u0938\u0941\u0936\u093f\u0932  \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930  \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342745_\u092f\u094b\u0917\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342745_\u092f\u094b\u0917\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342766_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0935\u0943\u0915\u094d\u0937 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342766_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0935\u0943\u0915\u094d\u0937 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341388_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0947\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341388_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0947\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342592_\u092d\u093e\u0917\u0947\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0930 \u0926\u093e\u0938": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342592_\u092d\u093e\u0917\u0947\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0930 \u0926\u093e\u0938", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340101_\u0930\u0902\u091c\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340101_\u0930\u0902\u091c\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342718_\u091c\u093f\u0935\u091b \u092e\u094b\u091a\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342718_\u091c\u093f\u0935\u091b \u092e\u094b\u091a\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341818_\u0915\u0930\u094d\u0923 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092b\u0941\u092f\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341818_\u0915\u0930\u094d\u0923 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092b\u0941\u092f\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341583_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094b\u0926 \u0918\u093f\u092e\u093f\u0930\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341583_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094b\u0926 \u0918\u093f\u092e\u093f\u0930\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341380_\u092e\u093e\u0927\u0935 \u0915\u094b\u0908\u0930\u093e\u0932\u093e \u0916\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341380_\u092e\u093e\u0927\u0935 \u0915\u094b\u0908\u0930\u093e\u0932\u093e \u0916\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342219_\u092a\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0923 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0936\u093f\u0935\u093e\u0915\u094b\u091f\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342219_\u092a\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0923 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0936\u093f\u0935\u093e\u0915\u094b\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342272_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u094b\u0907\u0930\u093e\u0932\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342272_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u094b\u0907\u0930\u093e\u0932\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339358_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u092c\u094b\u0932 \u092c\u0938\u094d\u0928\u0947\u0924": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339358_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u092c\u094b\u0932 \u092c\u0938\u094d\u0928\u0947\u0924", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341178_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0938 \u0909\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0924\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341178_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0938 \u0909\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0924\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342032_\u0938\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0940\u0932\u093e  \u092b\u0941\u092f\u093e\u0932 \u091a\u094c\u0932\u093e\u0917\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342032_\u0938\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0940\u0932\u093e  \u092b\u0941\u092f\u093e\u0932 \u091a\u094c\u0932\u093e\u0917\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339352_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u0926\u0939\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339352_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u0926\u0939\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340617_\u0938\u0902\u0917\u0940\u0924\u093e \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340617_\u0938\u0902\u0917\u0940\u0924\u093e \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340975_\u0938\u0941\u0926\u093f\u092a  \u0916\u0921\u094d\u200d\u0915\u093e ": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340975_\u0938\u0941\u0926\u093f\u092a  \u0916\u0921\u094d\u200d\u0915\u093e ", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340591_\u0930\u092e\u093f\u0932\u093e \u0938\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340591_\u0930\u092e\u093f\u0932\u093e \u0938\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341705_\u092a\u0941\u0938\u094d\u0915\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341705_\u092a\u0941\u0938\u094d\u0915\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341431_\u092e\u0939\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0916\u0921\u094d\u0915\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341431_\u092e\u0939\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0916\u0921\u094d\u0915\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341648_\u092d\u0930\u0924  \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930  \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341648_\u092d\u0930\u0924  \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930  \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339722_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u0915\u093e\u091c\u0940 \u0932\u093e\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339722_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u0915\u093e\u091c\u0940 \u0932\u093e\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341262_\u0930\u093f\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0913\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341262_\u0930\u093f\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0913\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340911_\u0932\u0941\u0915 \u0926\u094b\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0947 \u0936\u0947\u0930\u094d\u092a\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340911_\u0932\u0941\u0915 \u0926\u094b\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0947 \u0936\u0947\u0930\u094d\u092a\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339325_\u0938\u0941\u092e\u0928 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339325_\u0938\u0941\u092e\u0928 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340628_\u0905\u0930\u0941\u0923 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340628_\u0905\u0930\u0941\u0923 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940", "\u0928\u0947\u0936\u0928\u0932 \u0930\u093f\u092a\u092c\u094d\u0932\u093f\u0915 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932": "\u0928\u0947\u0936\u0928\u0932 \u0930\u093f\u092a\u092c\u094d\u0932\u093f\u0915 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341491_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094b\u0937 \u0918\u093f\u092e\u093f\u0930\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341491_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094b\u0937 \u0918\u093f\u092e\u093f\u0930\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341158_\u092c\u093e\u092c\u0941 \u0915\u093e\u0901\u091c\u0940 \u0916\u0921\u094d\u0915\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341158_\u092c\u093e\u092c\u0941 \u0915\u093e\u0901\u091c\u0940 \u0916\u0921\u094d\u0915\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342145_\u0905\u092e\u0943\u0924 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0915\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342145_\u0905\u092e\u0943\u0924 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0915\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341410_\u092e\u0939\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u0926\u093e\u0939\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341410_\u092e\u0939\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u0926\u093e\u0939\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341577_\u0916\u0921\u094d\u0917 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0935\u093e\u0908\u0935\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341577_\u0916\u0921\u094d\u0917 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0935\u093e\u0908\u0935\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342630_\u092e\u093e\u0927\u0935 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0928\u094d\u092f\u094c\u092a\u093e\u0928\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342630_\u092e\u093e\u0927\u0935 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0928\u094d\u092f\u094c\u092a\u093e\u0928\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342342_\u0938\u0930\u094b\u091c \u092c\u093f.\u0915.": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342342_\u0938\u0930\u094b\u091c \u092c\u093f.\u0915.", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341275_\u0928\u0930 \u0939\u0930\u0940 \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341275_\u0928\u0930 \u0939\u0930\u0940 \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340138_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340138_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341373_\u0936\u093e\u0930\u0926\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0918\u093f\u0938\u093f\u0919\u0917\u094d": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341373_\u0936\u093e\u0930\u0926\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0918\u093f\u0938\u093f\u0919\u0917\u094d", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339788_\u092a\u0930\u0936\u0941\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339788_\u092a\u0930\u0936\u0941\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342599_\u0930\u094b\u0936\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342599_\u0930\u094b\u0936\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341018_\u0905\u091c\u092f \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341018_\u0905\u091c\u092f \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341459_\u0915\u093f\u0930\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u092c": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341459_\u0915\u093f\u0930\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u092c", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342705_\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342705_\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341074_\u091c\u0917\u0930\u0928\u093e\u0925 \u092e\u0902\u0921\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341074_\u091c\u0917\u0930\u0928\u093e\u0925 \u092e\u0902\u0921\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342742_\u0938\u0941\u0926\u093f\u092a \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342742_\u0938\u0941\u0926\u093f\u092a \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0907\u0924\u093f\u0939\u093e\u0938\u093f\u0915 \u091c\u0928\u0924\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0907\u0924\u093f\u0939\u093e\u0938\u093f\u0915 \u091c\u0928\u0924\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342412_\u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u0926\u093e\u0938 \u0924\u0924\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342412_\u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u0926\u093e\u0938 \u0924\u0924\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342713_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0926\u0941\u0932\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342713_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0926\u0941\u0932\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342339_\u0915\u093f\u0930\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0915\u093e\u092a\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342339_\u0915\u093f\u0930\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0915\u093e\u092a\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341554_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u0939\u0928\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341554_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u0939\u0928\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342688_\u091c\u093f\u0924\u0928 \u0930\u093e\u092f \u0905\u092e\u093e\u0924": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342688_\u091c\u093f\u0924\u0928 \u0930\u093e\u092f \u0905\u092e\u093e\u0924", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342474_\u0914\u0924\u0940 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0915\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342474_\u0914\u0924\u0940 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0915\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342725_\u092c\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342725_\u092c\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342144_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u092a\u0943\u0924 \u0926\u093e\u0938 \u0924\u0924\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342144_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u092a\u0943\u0924 \u0926\u093e\u0938 \u0924\u0924\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339611_\u0935\u093f\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u092c": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339611_\u0935\u093f\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u092c", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341981_\u0938\u0941\u0926\u093f\u0936 \u092e\u0902\u0921\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341981_\u0938\u0941\u0926\u093f\u0936 \u092e\u0902\u0921\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341899_\u092e\u0928\u092e\u094b\u0939\u0928 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341899_\u092e\u0928\u092e\u094b\u0939\u0928 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341321_\u0930\u092e\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939\u0941 \u0938\u0941\u0921\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341321_\u0930\u092e\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939\u0941 \u0938\u0941\u0921\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339840_\u092a\u0930\u093f\u0915\u094d\u0937\u0923 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339840_\u092a\u0930\u093f\u0915\u094d\u0937\u0923 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342646_\u0915\u093f\u0930\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342646_\u0915\u093f\u0930\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342736_\u092a\u0935\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342736_\u092a\u0935\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342373_\u0932\u093e\u0932\u0947\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342373_\u0932\u093e\u0932\u0947\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340215_\u0938\u0941\u092e\u0928 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0915\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340215_\u0938\u0941\u092e\u0928 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0915\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341596_\u0915\u0915\u0941\u0932\u0924\u0940 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341596_\u0915\u0915\u0941\u0932\u0924\u0940 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342579_\u0938\u094b\u091a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342579_\u0938\u094b\u091a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342210_\u0938\u200c\u0902\u091c\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342210_\u0938\u200c\u0902\u091c\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340430_\u091c\u092f \u0928\u093e\u0925 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340430_\u091c\u092f \u0928\u093e\u0925 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342331_\u0932\u0915\u094d\u0937\u094d\u200d\u092e\u0940 \u092e\u0941\u0916\u093f\u092f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342331_\u0932\u0915\u094d\u0937\u094d\u200d\u092e\u0940 \u092e\u0941\u0916\u093f\u092f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341997_\u0909\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u0926\u093e\u0938": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341997_\u0909\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u0926\u093e\u0938", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341665_\u0905\u0928\u093f\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341665_\u0905\u0928\u093f\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341066_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341066_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342708_\u0921\u094b\u092e\u0940 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e \u091a\u092e\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342708_\u0921\u094b\u092e\u0940 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e \u091a\u092e\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341697_\u092d\u094b\u0932\u093e \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341697_\u092d\u094b\u0932\u093e \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342504_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u0938\u093e\u0917\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u092c": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342504_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u0938\u093e\u0917\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u092c", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342317_\u0905\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0926\u093e\u0938": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342317_\u0905\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0926\u093e\u0938", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340950_\u0938\u093e\u0927\u0941 \u0936\u0930\u0923 \u092e\u094b\u0930\u0935\u0948\u0924\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340950_\u0938\u093e\u0927\u0941 \u0936\u0930\u0923 \u092e\u094b\u0930\u0935\u0948\u0924\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342302_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342302_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342276_\u0930\u093f\u0902\u0915\u0941 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u092e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342276_\u0930\u093f\u0902\u0915\u0941 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u092e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342457_\u0920\u0915\u0928\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342457_\u0920\u0915\u0928\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342030_\u0936\u093f\u0935 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0917\u094b\u0939\u093f\u0935\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u092c": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342030_\u0936\u093f\u0935 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0917\u094b\u0939\u093f\u0935\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u092c", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341905_\u0938\u093e\u0917\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341905_\u0938\u093e\u0917\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341841_\u0905\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0930\u093f\u0915": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341841_\u0905\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0930\u093f\u0915", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341938_\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092c\u093e\u092c\u0941 \u092e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341938_\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092c\u093e\u092c\u0941 \u092e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339556_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094b\u0937 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935 \u092e\u0930\u093f\u0915": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339556_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094b\u0937 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935 \u092e\u0930\u093f\u0915", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341428_\u092e\u0941\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341428_\u092e\u0941\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341180_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0938\u0941\u092d\u0947\u0937 \u092e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0932 \u0916\u0924\u094d\u0935\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341180_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0938\u0941\u092d\u0947\u0937 \u092e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0932 \u0916\u0924\u094d\u0935\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342492_\u092d\u094b\u0932\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342492_\u092d\u094b\u0932\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342439_\u0938\u0930\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342439_\u0938\u0930\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342623_\u0938\u0941\u091c\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0926\u093e\u0938": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342623_\u0938\u0941\u091c\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0926\u093e\u0938", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342476_\u091c\u094d\u091e\u093e\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u092c": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342476_\u091c\u094d\u091e\u093e\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u092c", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340839_\u0930\u094b\u0936\u0928 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340839_\u0930\u094b\u0936\u0928 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341566_\u0926\u093f\u0935\u093e\u0915\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341566_\u0926\u093f\u0935\u093e\u0915\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342092_\u0938\u0940\u0924\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342092_\u0938\u0940\u0924\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341649_\u0936\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092e \u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341649_\u0936\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092e \u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340988_\u0928\u0935\u0940\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u0902\u091c\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340988_\u0928\u0935\u0940\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u0902\u091c\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341204_\u0905\u0930\u092c\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341204_\u0905\u0930\u092c\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342389_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0948\u0924 \u092e\u0902\u0921\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342389_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0948\u0924 \u092e\u0902\u0921\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339875_\u0905\u092e\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0920\u0915": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339875_\u0905\u092e\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0920\u0915", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341504_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341504_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341877_\u0938\u0940\u0924\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341877_\u0938\u0940\u0924\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342499_\u0906\u0928\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u0926\u093e\u0938 \u0924\u0924\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342499_\u0906\u0928\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u0926\u093e\u0938 \u0924\u0924\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340667_\u0928\u092c\u094b\u0928\u093e\u0925 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340667_\u0928\u092c\u094b\u0928\u093e\u0925 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342720_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u0941\u0932\u094d\u0924\u093e\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342720_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u0941\u0932\u094d\u0924\u093e\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341809_\u0905\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341809_\u0905\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342346_\u092e\u0941\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342346_\u092e\u0941\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342676_\u092c\u093f\u0915\u094d\u0930\u092e \u0938\u093e\u0939 ": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342676_\u092c\u093f\u0915\u094d\u0930\u092e \u0938\u093e\u0939 ", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341365_\u092d\u0930\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341365_\u092d\u0930\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341733_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341733_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342524_\u0938\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0932 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342524_\u0938\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0932 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342073_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342073_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341426_\u0915\u0947\u0935\u0932 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341426_\u0915\u0947\u0935\u0932 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341195_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0941 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341195_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0941 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341344_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u0938\u0930\u094b\u091c \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341344_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u0938\u0930\u094b\u091c \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342264_\u0938\u0941\u0935\u0926\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342264_\u0938\u0941\u0935\u0926\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341452_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341452_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342109_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094b\u0926 \u0915\u0930\u094d\u0923": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342109_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094b\u0926 \u0915\u0930\u094d\u0923", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341619_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341619_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342296_\u092e\u093e\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0926\u093e\u0938": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342296_\u092e\u093e\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0926\u093e\u0938", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341848_\u0938\u0940\u0924\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341848_\u0938\u0940\u0924\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341586_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u0939\u0943\u0926\u092f \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341586_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u0939\u0943\u0926\u092f \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341494_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094b\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341494_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094b\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341716_\u092c\u093f\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341716_\u092c\u093f\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341267_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b \u0915\u094b\u0907\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341267_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b \u0915\u094b\u0907\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341861_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u092e\u094b\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341861_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u092e\u094b\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341950_\u091c\u0902\u0917 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341950_\u091c\u0902\u0917 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340601_\u0905\u0928\u093f\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340601_\u0905\u0928\u093f\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341622_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341622_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342609_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342609_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342446_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342446_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342312_\u092e\u0941\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342312_\u092e\u0941\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342137_\u0935\u094c\u0935\u0947\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342137_\u0935\u094c\u0935\u0947\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342241_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0915 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342241_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0915 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340677_\u0938\u0924\u0940\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340677_\u0938\u0924\u0940\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340909_\u091c\u093e\u0917\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b \u0915\u094b\u0907\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340909_\u091c\u093e\u0917\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b \u0915\u094b\u0907\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340969_\u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0935\u093e\u0938\u094d\u0924\u094b\u0932\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340969_\u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0935\u093e\u0938\u094d\u0924\u094b\u0932\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342408_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u094d\u200d\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342408_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u094d\u200d\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341396_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u0936\u0902\u0915\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341396_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u0936\u0902\u0915\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342063_\u092e\u093f\u0925\u093f\u0932\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342063_\u092e\u093f\u0925\u093f\u0932\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342278_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342278_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341915_\u0930\u093e\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341915_\u0930\u093e\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340530_\u0935\u093e\u0901\u0935\u0940 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340530_\u0935\u093e\u0901\u0935\u0940 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341834_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341834_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342098_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0939\u0943\u0926\u092f \u092f\u093e\u0926\u092c": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342098_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0939\u0943\u0926\u092f \u092f\u093e\u0926\u092c", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342340_\u0938\u0941\u0928\u0948\u0928\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0915\u094b\u0907\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342340_\u0938\u0941\u0928\u0948\u0928\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0915\u094b\u0907\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342270_\u0936\u093f\u0935 \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342270_\u0936\u093f\u0935 \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341515_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0928\u093e \u092e\u0917\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341515_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0928\u093e \u092e\u0917\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342536_\u091c\u0940\u0935\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0917\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342536_\u091c\u0940\u0935\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0917\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339938_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339938_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340318_\u0938\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0932  \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930  \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340318_\u0938\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0932  \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930  \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342684_\u0928\u093f\u0930\u0941 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342684_\u0928\u093f\u0930\u0941 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342239_\u092a\u0930\u092e\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0928 \u0926\u0941\u0938\u093e\u0927": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342239_\u092a\u0930\u092e\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0928 \u0926\u0941\u0938\u093e\u0927", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341201_\u0938\u094b\u092e\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341201_\u0938\u094b\u092e\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341831_\u092c\u094c\u0935\u0947 \u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341831_\u092c\u094c\u0935\u0947 \u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339879_\u0938\u091a\u093f\u0928 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339879_\u0938\u091a\u093f\u0928 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340828_\u0938\u0935\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340828_\u0938\u0935\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342297_\u0938\u0915\u093f\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342297_\u0938\u0915\u093f\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e", "\u091c\u0928\u093e\u0926\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932(\u090f\u0915\u0932 \u091a\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0935 \u091a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0939)": "\u091c\u0928\u093e\u0926\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932(\u090f\u0915\u0932 \u091a\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0935 \u091a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0939)", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341032_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341032_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342664_\u0927\u0928\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0939\u093e\u0925\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342664_\u0927\u0928\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0939\u093e\u0925\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341895_\u092c\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341895_\u092c\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342631_\u0926\u0941\u0932\u0930\u0940 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0925\u093e\u0930\u0941": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342631_\u0926\u0941\u0932\u0930\u0940 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0925\u093e\u0930\u0941", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342423_\u092d\u0930\u0924 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342423_\u092d\u0930\u0924 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341724_\u0907\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u0938\u0939\u0928\u0940 \u092e\u0932\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341724_\u0907\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u0938\u0939\u0928\u0940 \u092e\u0932\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341507_\u0936\u094d\u0930\u0940 \u0930\u093e\u092e \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939 \u0926\u0928\u0941\u0935\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341507_\u0936\u094d\u0930\u0940 \u0930\u093e\u092e \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939 \u0926\u0928\u0941\u0935\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340113_\u091c\u092f \u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340113_\u091c\u092f \u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340447_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0917\u0941\u0930\u0941 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340447_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0917\u0941\u0930\u0941 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342535_\u0935\u093f\u0915\u0947 \u0906\u091c\u093e\u0926 \u0926\u093e\u0938": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342535_\u0935\u093f\u0915\u0947 \u0906\u091c\u093e\u0926 \u0926\u093e\u0938", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340145_\u0938\u0924\u093f\u0936 \u0938\u093e\u0939 \u0924\u0947\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340145_\u0938\u0924\u093f\u0936 \u0938\u093e\u0939 \u0924\u0947\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342513_\u092c\u093f\u0928\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342513_\u092c\u093f\u0928\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342393_\u091c\u093f\u0935\u0947\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342393_\u091c\u093f\u0935\u0947\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340879_\u092e\u0939\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340879_\u092e\u0939\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341865_\u0926\u093f\u0932\u093f\u092a \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341865_\u0926\u093f\u0932\u093f\u092a \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340285_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0935\u093f\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340285_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0935\u093f\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341553_\u092e\u0939\u0902\u0925 \u0938\u0926\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341553_\u092e\u0939\u0902\u0925 \u0938\u0926\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342615_\u0932\u0932\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092e\u0941\u0938\u0939\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342615_\u0932\u0932\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092e\u0941\u0938\u0939\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340027_\u0938\u0924\u094d\u200d\u092f \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0928 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340027_\u0938\u0924\u094d\u200d\u092f \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0928 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342173_\u0905\u0918\u0928\u0941 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342173_\u0905\u0918\u0928\u0941 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342598_\u0930\u0947\u0936\u092e\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342598_\u0930\u0947\u0936\u092e\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340816_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0906\u0927\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u092a\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340816_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0906\u0927\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u092a\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340033_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340033_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342559_\u0936\u092e\u094d\u092d\u0941 \u0915\u093e\u092a\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342559_\u0936\u092e\u094d\u092d\u0941 \u0915\u093e\u092a\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342215_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0928\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u0928 \u0930\u093e\u092f \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342215_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0928\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u0928 \u0930\u093e\u092f \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341232_\u0930\u0902\u091c\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u091d\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341232_\u0930\u0902\u091c\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u091d\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341110_\u092c\u0947\u091a\u0928 \u092e\u0923\u094d\u200d\u0921\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341110_\u092c\u0947\u091a\u0928 \u092e\u0923\u094d\u200d\u0921\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342537_\u092c\u0947\u091a\u0928 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092e\u0947\u0939\u0924\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342537_\u092c\u0947\u091a\u0928 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092e\u0947\u0939\u0924\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342577_\u0928\u0908\u092e \u0930\u093e\u0908\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342577_\u0928\u0908\u092e \u0930\u093e\u0908\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340784_\u0936\u094d\u200d\u092f\u093e\u092e \u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340784_\u0936\u094d\u200d\u092f\u093e\u092e \u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342527_\u0918\u0928\u0936\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092e \u091d\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342527_\u0918\u0928\u0936\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092e \u091d\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342551_\u0930\u093e\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342551_\u0930\u093e\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340698_\u092e\u094b\u0939\u0928 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340698_\u092e\u094b\u0939\u0928 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342614_\u092e\u094b\u0939\u092e\u094d\u092e\u0926 \u092b\u093f\u0930\u094b\u091c \u0905\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342614_\u092e\u094b\u0939\u092e\u094d\u092e\u0926 \u092b\u093f\u0930\u094b\u091c \u0905\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340891_\u092e\u0941\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0930\u093e\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340891_\u092e\u0941\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0930\u093e\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341810_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341810_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341175_\u0935\u0935\u093f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341175_\u0935\u0935\u093f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342602_\u0938\u0924\u093f\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342602_\u0938\u0924\u093f\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342101_\u0928\u093e\u0917\u0947\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342101_\u0928\u093e\u0917\u0947\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342395_\u0930\u092e\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342395_\u0930\u092e\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342693_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342693_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342325_\u0905\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342325_\u0905\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342176_\u092a\u0935\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342176_\u092a\u0935\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342634_\u092c\u093f\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0902\u0921\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342634_\u092c\u093f\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0902\u0921\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342662_\u092a\u0902\u0915\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0947\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342662_\u092a\u0902\u0915\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0947\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341956_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341956_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341058_\u0930\u0902\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u093f\u0936\u094d\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341058_\u0930\u0902\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u093f\u0936\u094d\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342749_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094b\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0902\u0921\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342749_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094b\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0902\u0921\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342737_\u0935\u093f\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342737_\u0935\u093f\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341397_\u0938\u0902\u091c\u092f \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341397_\u0938\u0902\u091c\u092f \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341478_\u092c\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0909 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341478_\u092c\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0909 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340331_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0928 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340331_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0928 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342747_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0935\u093f\u0928\u094b\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342747_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0935\u093f\u0928\u094b\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339650_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u092c": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339650_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u092c", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339622_\u0905\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339622_\u0905\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342765_\u0917\u0923\u0947\u0936 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930 \u0932\u094b\u0939\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342765_\u0917\u0923\u0947\u0936 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930 \u0932\u094b\u0939\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342783_\u0907\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u091c\u0940\u0924 \u0926\u093e\u0938": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342783_\u0907\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u091c\u0940\u0924 \u0926\u093e\u0938", "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u091c\u0928\u0924\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932": "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u091c\u0928\u0924\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341806_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0947\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341806_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0947\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342775_\u0930\u092e\u093f\u0928\u093e \u0916\u093e\u0924\u0941\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342775_\u0930\u092e\u093f\u0928\u093e \u0916\u093e\u0924\u0941\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342645_\u0938\u0941\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342645_\u0938\u0941\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342334_\u0917\u0902\u0917\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u092c": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342334_\u0917\u0902\u0917\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u092c", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342780_\u0930\u093f\u091c\u092c\u093e\u0928\u093e \u0916\u093e\u0924\u0941\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342780_\u0930\u093f\u091c\u092c\u093e\u0928\u093e \u0916\u093e\u0924\u0941\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342785_\u0938\u0924\u094d\u200d\u092f\u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342785_\u0938\u0924\u094d\u200d\u092f\u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342714_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092e\u0923\u094d\u200d\u0921\u0932 \u0916\u0924\u092c\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342714_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092e\u0923\u094d\u200d\u0921\u0932 \u0916\u0924\u092c\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342744_\u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939\u0947\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0930 \u0916\u0924\u094d\u092c\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342744_\u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939\u0947\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0930 \u0916\u0924\u094d\u092c\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342400_\u092e\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342400_\u092e\u0939\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u092e\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342787_\u0936\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u093f \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342787_\u0936\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u093f \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342761_\u0939\u0930\u0926\u0947\u092c \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e \u091a\u092e\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342761_\u0939\u0930\u0926\u0947\u092c \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e \u091a\u092e\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340013_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340013_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340919_\u0939\u0930\u093f\u0936\u094d\u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340919_\u0939\u0930\u093f\u0936\u094d\u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342753_\u0930\u0947\u0935\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342753_\u0930\u0947\u0935\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u092e\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u0906\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094b\u0932\u0928, \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932": "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u092e\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u0906\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094b\u0932\u0928, \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342784_\u092e\u094b\u0939\u0928 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342784_\u092e\u094b\u0939\u0928 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342627_\u0905\u0930\u0941\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094d\u0924\u094b  \u0938\u0941\u0921\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342627_\u0905\u0930\u0941\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094d\u0924\u094b  \u0938\u0941\u0921\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342673_\u0917\u092e\u094d\u092d\u0940\u0930 \u0939\u0930\u0940 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342673_\u0917\u092e\u094d\u092d\u0940\u0930 \u0939\u0930\u0940 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342794_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0926\u0941\u0932\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342794_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0926\u0941\u0932\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341876_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u092a\u0930\u093f\u0915\u094d\u0937\u0923 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341876_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u092a\u0930\u093f\u0915\u094d\u0937\u0923 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342777_\u092e\u093e\u0927\u094b \u092a\u093e\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0928 \u0926\u0941\u0938\u093e\u0927": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342777_\u092e\u093e\u0927\u094b \u092a\u093e\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0928 \u0926\u0941\u0938\u093e\u0927", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341119_\u092d\u0930\u0924  \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940 ": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341119_\u092d\u0930\u0924  \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940 ", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342792_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0915\u0932\u093e\u0938": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342792_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0915\u0932\u093e\u0938", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342388_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342388_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u092f", "\u0917\u0924\u093f\u0936\u0940\u0932 \u0932\u094b\u0915\u0924\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0917\u0924\u093f\u0936\u0940\u0932 \u0932\u094b\u0915\u0924\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340393_\u0905\u092c\u094d\u0926\u0941\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u0926\u0941\u0938 \u092e\u0902\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340393_\u0905\u092c\u094d\u0926\u0941\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u0926\u0941\u0938 \u092e\u0902\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340525_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0915\u0947\u0935\u0932 \u0930\u093e\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340525_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0915\u0947\u0935\u0932 \u0930\u093e\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342533_\u0924\u0947\u091c \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092e\u0941\u0938\u0939\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342533_\u0924\u0947\u091c \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092e\u0941\u0938\u0939\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342682_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u092c\u093e\u0935\u0941 \u0930\u093e\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342682_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u092c\u093e\u0935\u0941 \u0930\u093e\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341118_\u0917\u0941\u0928\u094d\u091c\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0936\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341118_\u0917\u0941\u0928\u094d\u091c\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0936\u093e\u0939", "\u092f\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0908\u091f\u0947\u0921 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0921\u093f\u092e\u094b\u0915\u094d\u0930\u092f\u093e\u091f\u0940\u0915 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u092f\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0908\u091f\u0947\u0921 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0921\u093f\u092e\u094b\u0915\u094d\u0930\u092f\u093e\u091f\u0940\u0915 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342660_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0930\u093e\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342660_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0930\u093e\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342486_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342486_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342643_\u0928\u093e\u0917\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342643_\u0928\u093e\u0917\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340435_\u0935\u093f\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930 \u0932\u094b\u0939\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340435_\u0935\u093f\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930 \u0932\u094b\u0939\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341035_\u0915\u0902\u091a\u0928 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341035_\u0915\u0902\u091a\u0928 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342611_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0928 \u0930\u093e\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342611_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0928 \u0930\u093e\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342586_\u0935\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0909 \u0930\u093e\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342586_\u0935\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0909 \u0930\u093e\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340482_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340482_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342626_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930  \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342626_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930  \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342156_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0928\u093e\u0925 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342156_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0928\u093e\u0925 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342703_\u0938\u0924\u094d\u092f \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940 \u0915\u0932\u0935\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342703_\u0938\u0924\u094d\u092f \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940 \u0915\u0932\u0935\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341462_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0923 \u0928\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0928 \u0930\u093e\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341462_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0923 \u0928\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0928 \u0930\u093e\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342695_\u092f\u0941\u0935\u0930\u093e\u091c \u092a\u093e\u0916\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342695_\u092f\u0941\u0935\u0930\u093e\u091c \u092a\u093e\u0916\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342734_\u092f\u0941\u0935\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0932\u0941\u0908\u091f\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342734_\u092f\u0941\u0935\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0932\u0941\u0908\u091f\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342538_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923\u093e  \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930  \u0936\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342538_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923\u093e  \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930  \u0936\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342722_\u092e\u0941\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342722_\u092e\u0941\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342740_\u0924\u091c\u0935\u093f\u091c \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342740_\u0924\u091c\u0935\u093f\u091c \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u092a\u094d\u0930\u091c\u093e\u0924\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932": "\u092a\u094d\u0930\u091c\u093e\u0924\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342489_\u0905\u0928\u093f\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342489_\u0905\u0928\u093f\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342512_\u091c\u092f \u0932\u093e\u0932 \u0938\u0939\u0928\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342512_\u091c\u092f \u0932\u093e\u0932 \u0938\u0939\u0928\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340757_\u092c\u0948\u091c\u0941 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340757_\u092c\u0948\u091c\u0941 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342625_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092a\u0943\u0924 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342625_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092a\u0943\u0924 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341856_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0926\u093f\u092a \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341856_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0926\u093f\u092a \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342653_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u092e\u094b\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342653_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u092e\u094b\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340527_\u0932\u0915\u094d\u0937\u094d\u092e\u0940 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340527_\u0932\u0915\u094d\u0937\u094d\u092e\u0940 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342607_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u091a\u092e\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342607_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u091a\u092e\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342729_\u0909\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342729_\u0909\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342102_\u0921\u092e\u094d\u0935\u0930 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0916\u0921\u094d\u0915\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342102_\u0921\u092e\u094d\u0935\u0930 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0916\u0921\u094d\u0915\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342256_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u092e\u094b\u0926 \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f\u0930\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342256_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u092e\u094b\u0926 \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f\u0930\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342161_\u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0928 \u0930\u093e\u091c\u0935\u0902\u0936\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342161_\u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0928 \u0930\u093e\u091c\u0935\u0902\u0936\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342738_\u0932\u094b\u0915 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0926\u0930\u094d\u0932\u093e\u092e\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342738_\u0932\u094b\u0915 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0926\u0930\u094d\u0932\u093e\u092e\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341496_\u0938\u091a\u093f\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u0938\u0939\u0928\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341496_\u0938\u091a\u093f\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u0938\u0939\u0928\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341162_\u091c\u094d\u091e\u093e\u0928\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u0936\u0935\u093e\u0939\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341162_\u091c\u094d\u091e\u093e\u0928\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u0936\u0935\u093e\u0939\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340740_\u092e\u0941\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u0936\u0935\u093e\u0939\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340740_\u092e\u0941\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u0936\u0935\u093e\u0939\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342194_\u0905\u091c\u092f \u0913\u091d\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342194_\u0905\u091c\u092f \u0913\u091d\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341687_\u0928\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341687_\u0928\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341709_\u0928\u093f\u0932\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341709_\u0928\u093f\u0932\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342696_\u091c\u092f \u0936\u0902\u0915\u0930 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939 \u0915\u0941\u0936\u0935\u093e\u0939\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342696_\u091c\u092f \u0936\u0902\u0915\u0930 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939 \u0915\u0941\u0936\u0935\u093e\u0939\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342590_\u092e\u0939\u0947\u0936 \u092e\u0902\u0921\u0932 \u0927\u093e\u0928\u0941\u0915": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342590_\u092e\u0939\u0947\u0936 \u092e\u0902\u0921\u0932 \u0927\u093e\u0928\u0941\u0915", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342686_\u0936\u0941\u0932\u092a\u093e\u0928\u0940 \u091d\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342686_\u0936\u0941\u0932\u092a\u093e\u0928\u0940 \u091d\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341826_\u0930\u092e\u0923 \u092e\u093f\u0936\u094d\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341826_\u0930\u092e\u0923 \u092e\u093f\u0936\u094d\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342677_\u0927\u093f\u0930\u091c \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342677_\u0927\u093f\u0930\u091c \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341801_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0935\u0947\u0936 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341801_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0935\u0947\u0936 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342541_\u0917\u0928\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342541_\u0917\u0928\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342163_\u091b\u094b\u091f\u0947\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342163_\u091b\u094b\u091f\u0947\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342015_\u0915\u092e\u0932\u0947\u0936 \u092e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342015_\u0915\u092e\u0932\u0947\u0936 \u092e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341464_\u0938\u0902\u0924\u094b\u0937 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0928\u093f\u0937\u093e\u0926": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341464_\u0938\u0902\u0924\u094b\u0937 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0928\u093f\u0937\u093e\u0926", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340787_\u0905\u092e\u093f\u0924 \u0930\u0902\u091c\u0928 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340787_\u0905\u092e\u093f\u0924 \u0930\u0902\u091c\u0928 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341985_\u091a\u0941\u0928 \u091a\u0941\u0928 \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341985_\u091a\u0941\u0928 \u091a\u0941\u0928 \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341585_\u092e\u0927\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0932\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341585_\u092e\u0927\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0932\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340999_\u0936\u093f\u0935 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340999_\u0936\u093f\u0935 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342356_\u0905\u092e\u094d\u092c\u0941\u091c \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342356_\u0905\u092e\u094d\u092c\u0941\u091c \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342506_\u0935\u093f\u0915\u094d\u0930\u092e \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342506_\u0935\u093f\u0915\u094d\u0930\u092e \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342134_\u0932\u0916\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342134_\u0932\u0916\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342386_\u0938\u0902\u091c\u093f\u0935 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342386_\u0938\u0902\u091c\u093f\u0935 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340399_\u0905\u0930\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340399_\u0905\u0930\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341319_\u0938\u093e\u0917\u0930 \u0932\u093e\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341319_\u0938\u093e\u0917\u0930 \u0932\u093e\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340755_\u091a\u093f\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0915\u094b\u091f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340755_\u091a\u093f\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0915\u094b\u091f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341569_\u0926\u093e\u0935\u093e \u092e\u093f\u0919\u092e\u0930 \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919\u094d\u0917": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341569_\u0926\u093e\u0935\u093e \u092e\u093f\u0919\u092e\u0930 \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919\u094d\u0917", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341628_\u0928\u093f\u0930\u0928\u094d\u200d\u091c\u0928 \u0938\u0902\u091c\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341628_\u0928\u093f\u0930\u0928\u094d\u200d\u091c\u0928 \u0938\u0902\u091c\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342403_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0936 \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f\u0930\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342403_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0936 \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f\u0930\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342493_\u0924\u092a\u0928 \u0909\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0924\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342493_\u0924\u092a\u0928 \u0909\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0924\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342357_\u0915\u0947\u0936\u0935 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0930\u0941\u092a\u093e\u0916\u0947\u0924\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342357_\u0915\u0947\u0936\u0935 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0930\u0941\u092a\u093e\u0916\u0947\u0924\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342306_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342306_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341573_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0915 \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341573_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0915 \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340960_\u0927\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0935\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u200d\u0921\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340960_\u0927\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0935\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u200d\u0921\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342678_\u0927\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342678_\u0927\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341234_\u0905\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0941\u0928 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0905\u0930\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341234_\u0905\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0941\u0928 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0905\u0930\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342443_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0923 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342443_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0923 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341142_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0915 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341142_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0915 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340827_\u0930\u0941\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0917\u0947\u0932\u093e\u0919 \u092e\u0917\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340827_\u0930\u0941\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0917\u0947\u0932\u093e\u0919 \u092e\u0917\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341411_\u0926\u093e\u092e\u094b\u0926\u0930 \u0930\u093f\u091c\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341411_\u0926\u093e\u092e\u094b\u0926\u0930 \u0930\u093f\u091c\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341270_\u0936\u093f\u0935\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0938\u093e\u092a\u0915\u094b\u091f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341270_\u0936\u093f\u0935\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0938\u093e\u092a\u0915\u094b\u091f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342001_\u092d\u0930\u0924 \u0922\u0941\u0902\u200c\u0917\u093e\u0928\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342001_\u092d\u0930\u0924 \u0922\u0941\u0902\u200c\u0917\u093e\u0928\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340593_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0923 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0915\u094b\u0907\u0930\u093e\u0932\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340593_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0923 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0915\u094b\u0907\u0930\u093e\u0932\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341014_\u0909\u091c\u094d\u0935\u0932 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341014_\u0909\u091c\u094d\u0935\u0932 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341298_\u0936\u093f\u0935 \u0928\u093f\u0927\u093f \u0916\u0928\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341298_\u0936\u093f\u0935 \u0928\u093f\u0927\u093f \u0916\u0928\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340578_\u0938\u0902\u091c\u093f\u0935 \u0917\u0941\u0930\u0941\u0919": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340578_\u0938\u0902\u091c\u093f\u0935 \u0917\u0941\u0930\u0941\u0919", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342253_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0941 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342253_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0941 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339559_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339559_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342162_\u092e\u093e\u0927\u0935 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342162_\u092e\u093e\u0927\u0935 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340439_\u091a\u0947\u092a\u0947 \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340439_\u091a\u0947\u092a\u0947 \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341274_\u0915\u0941\u0936\u0932 \u0916\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341274_\u0915\u0941\u0936\u0932 \u0916\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340337_\u0938\u093e\u0917\u0930 \u091c\u094b\u0936\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340337_\u0938\u093e\u0917\u0930 \u091c\u094b\u0936\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339780_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0922\u0915\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339780_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0922\u0915\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340900_\u0905\u0938\u093f\u092e \u092e\u093e\u0928 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939 \u0935\u0938\u094d\u0928\u092f\u093e\u0924": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340900_\u0905\u0938\u093f\u092e \u092e\u093e\u0928 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939 \u0935\u0938\u094d\u0928\u092f\u093e\u0924", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342502_\u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0936\u093e\u0939\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342502_\u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0936\u093e\u0939\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339489_\u0915\u092e\u0932 \u0915\u094b\u0907\u0930\u093e\u0932\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339489_\u0915\u092e\u0932 \u0915\u094b\u0907\u0930\u093e\u0932\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340248_\u0936\u092e\u094d\u092d\u0941 \u092a\u094b\u0916\u0930\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340248_\u0936\u092e\u094d\u092d\u0941 \u092a\u094b\u0916\u0930\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340065_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092c\u091c\u0917\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340065_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092c\u091c\u0917\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342419_\u0915\u093f\u0930\u0923 \u0936\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342419_\u0915\u093f\u0930\u0923 \u0936\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342337_\u0930\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091c\u094b\u0936\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342337_\u0930\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091c\u094b\u0936\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340007_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0941 \u092d\u0941\u091c\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340007_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0941 \u092d\u0941\u091c\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339825_\u0936\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u0940 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339825_\u0936\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u0940 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342385_\u0938\u0902\u0917\u093f\u0924 \u092c\u092e\u094d\u092e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342385_\u0938\u0902\u0917\u093f\u0924 \u092c\u092e\u094d\u092e", "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u091c\u0928\u0938\u0947\u0935\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u091c\u0928\u0938\u0947\u0935\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342198_\u092c\u093f\u0928\u094b\u0926 \u092c\u0941\u0922\u093e\u0925\u094b\u0915\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342198_\u092c\u093f\u0928\u094b\u0926 \u092c\u0941\u0922\u093e\u0925\u094b\u0915\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341918_\u0926\u0947\u0935 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341918_\u0926\u0947\u0935 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340404_\u0915\u092c\u093f\u0924\u093e \u092a\u0941\u0921\u093e\u0938\u0948\u0928\u0940 (\u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940)": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340404_\u0915\u092c\u093f\u0924\u093e \u092a\u0941\u0921\u093e\u0938\u0948\u0928\u0940 (\u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940)", "\u091c\u092f \u092e\u093e\u0924\u0943\u092d\u0942\u092e\u093f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u091c\u092f \u092e\u093e\u0924\u0943\u092d\u0942\u092e\u093f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342351_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0917\u093f\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342351_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0917\u093f\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342167_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0915 \u0930\u093e\u091c \u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342167_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0915 \u0930\u093e\u091c \u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341220_\u0905\u0928\u0941\u091c \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0927\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341220_\u0905\u0928\u0941\u091c \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0927\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340122_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340122_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342222_\u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0916\u093e\u0915\u0940 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342222_\u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0916\u093e\u0915\u0940 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340738_\u0938\u0941\u0932\u094b\u091a\u0928\u093e \u092a\u0930\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340738_\u0938\u0941\u0932\u094b\u091a\u0928\u093e \u092a\u0930\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339914_\u092e\u093f\u0928 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092c\u0941\u0922\u093e\u0925\u094b\u0915\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339914_\u092e\u093f\u0928 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092c\u0941\u0922\u093e\u0925\u094b\u0915\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342358_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342358_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341382_\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0932\u094b\u0915 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341382_\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0932\u094b\u0915 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341830_\u092c\u093f\u0938\u094d\u0935\u093e\u0938 \u092c\u0938\u094d\u0928\u0947\u0924": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341830_\u092c\u093f\u0938\u094d\u0935\u093e\u0938 \u092c\u0938\u094d\u0928\u0947\u0924", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341149_\u0935\u093f\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341149_\u0935\u093f\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339543_\u0930\u0941\u092a\u0915 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0916\u0921\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339543_\u0930\u0941\u092a\u0915 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0916\u0921\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340742_\u0924\u093f\u0930\u094d\u0925 \u0930\u093e\u091c \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340742_\u0924\u093f\u0930\u094d\u0925 \u0930\u093e\u091c \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341601_\u092e\u091e\u094d\u091c\u0941 \u0932\u093e\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341601_\u092e\u091e\u094d\u091c\u0941 \u0932\u093e\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339764_\u0905\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0941\u0928 \u0922\u0941\u0902\u0917\u093e\u0928\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339764_\u0905\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0941\u0928 \u0922\u0941\u0902\u0917\u093e\u0928\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342321_\u0930\u0941\u092a\u0915 \u092c\u0938\u094d\u0924\u093e\u0915\u094b\u091f\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342321_\u0930\u0941\u092a\u0915 \u092c\u0938\u094d\u0924\u093e\u0915\u094b\u091f\u0940", "\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092e\u0942\u0932 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932": "\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092e\u0942\u0932 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341036_\u091f\u092a \u0935\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341036_\u091f\u092a \u0935\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341228_\u0938\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0924\u093f\u0935\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341228_\u0938\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0924\u093f\u0935\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342180_\u0907\u0930\u093e \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342180_\u0907\u0930\u093e \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340288_\u0915\u0947\u0936\u0935 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340288_\u0915\u0947\u0936\u0935 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339394_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0922\u0941\u0919\u094d\u0917\u093e\u0928\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339394_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0922\u0941\u0919\u094d\u0917\u093e\u0928\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339459_\u0936\u094d\u0930\u0940\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0923 \u0935\u0930\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339459_\u0936\u094d\u0930\u0940\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0923 \u0935\u0930\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340144_\u0938\u091c\u094d\u200d\u091c\u0928 \u0906\u091a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340144_\u0938\u091c\u094d\u200d\u091c\u0928 \u0906\u091a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340684_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0923 \u092a\u0941\u091c\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340684_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0923 \u092a\u0941\u091c\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342431_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0926\u093f\u092a \u0915\u093e\u092b\u094d\u0932\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342431_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0926\u093f\u092a \u0915\u093e\u092b\u094d\u0932\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341139_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094b\u0926 \u092c\u093e\u092c\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0927\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341139_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094b\u0926 \u092c\u093e\u092c\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0927\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340985_\u0905\u0930\u094d\u091a\u0928 \u0936\u092e\u094d\u0936\u0947\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0923\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340985_\u0905\u0930\u094d\u091a\u0928 \u0936\u092e\u094d\u0936\u0947\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0923\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340821_\u092a\u0941\u091c\u0928 \u0917\u091c\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340821_\u092a\u0941\u091c\u0928 \u0917\u091c\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342460_\u0938\u0902\u091c\u093f\u0935 \u0926\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342460_\u0938\u0902\u091c\u093f\u0935 \u0926\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341712_\u0926\u0940\u092a\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u092b\u094d\u0932\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341712_\u0926\u0940\u092a\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u092b\u094d\u0932\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340460_\u0926\u0947\u0935\u0930\u093e\u091c \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340460_\u0926\u0947\u0935\u0930\u093e\u091c \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339792_\u092e\u0926\u0928 \u0926\u0947\u0935 \u0906\u091a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339792_\u092e\u0926\u0928 \u0926\u0947\u0935 \u0906\u091a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342613_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342613_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u091c\u0928\u092e\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u091c\u0928\u092e\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341789_\u0915\u0947\u0926\u093e\u0930 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341789_\u0915\u0947\u0926\u093e\u0930 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342188_\u0906\u0936\u093f\u0937 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342188_\u0906\u0936\u093f\u0937 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339569_\u0927\u0930\u094d\u092e \u0921\u0902\u0917\u094b\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339569_\u0927\u0930\u094d\u092e \u0921\u0902\u0917\u094b\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341246_\u0915\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092e\u0941\u0928\u093e \u092e\u093f\u091c\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341246_\u0915\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092e\u0941\u0928\u093e \u092e\u093f\u091c\u093e\u0930", "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u092e\u094d\u092f\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 (\u092e\u093e\u0915\u094d\u0930\u094d\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940)(\u090f\u0915\u0932 \u091a\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0935 \u091a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0939)": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u092e\u094d\u092f\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 (\u092e\u093e\u0915\u094d\u0930\u094d\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940)(\u090f\u0915\u0932 \u091a\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0935 \u091a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0939)", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340949_\u0922\u0915 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340949_\u0922\u0915 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341341_\u0930\u092e\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0938\u093e\u092a\u0915\u094b\u091f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341341_\u0930\u092e\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0938\u093e\u092a\u0915\u094b\u091f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341293_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u092d\u093e \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341293_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u092d\u093e \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340481_\u0905\u092e\u094d\u200d\u0935\u093f\u0915\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340481_\u0905\u092e\u094d\u200d\u0935\u093f\u0915\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342085_\u0938\u0930\u094b\u091c \u0925\u092a\u0932\u093f\u092f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342085_\u0938\u0930\u094b\u091c \u0925\u092a\u0932\u093f\u092f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342754_\u092c\u0932 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u0947.\u0938\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342754_\u092c\u0932 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u0947.\u0938\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342046_\u0938\u0902\u0917\u092e \u0905\u0930\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342046_\u0938\u0902\u0917\u092e \u0905\u0930\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340569_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0918\u093f\u092e\u093f\u0930\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340569_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0918\u093f\u092e\u093f\u0930\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341527_\u092d\u0930\u0924 \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341527_\u092d\u0930\u0924 \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340141_\u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093f\u0932\u093e \u092b\u0941\u092f\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340141_\u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093f\u0932\u093e \u092b\u0941\u092f\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340923_\u092c\u0941\u0926\u094d\u0927\u093f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0930\u0947\u0917\u094d\u092e\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340923_\u092c\u0941\u0926\u094d\u0927\u093f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0930\u0947\u0917\u094d\u092e\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341942_\u0905\u0928\u094d\u091c\u0932\u093e \u092c\u091c\u094d\u0930\u093e\u091a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341942_\u0905\u0928\u094d\u091c\u0932\u093e \u092c\u091c\u094d\u0930\u093e\u091a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341280_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0936  \u0915\u0941\u0901\u0935\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341280_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0936  \u0915\u0941\u0901\u0935\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341727_\u0938\u0941\u091c\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341727_\u0938\u0941\u091c\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342050_\u0905\u092e\u0928 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342050_\u0905\u092e\u0928 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342221_\u092a\u0941\u0937\u094d\u092a \u092c\u093e\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0901": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342221_\u092a\u0941\u0937\u094d\u092a \u092c\u093e\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0901", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341890_\u0938\u0941\u092e\u0928  \u092a\u0941\u0924\u0941\u0935\u093e\u0930  / \u092e\u0939\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0928 ": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341890_\u0938\u0941\u092e\u0928  \u092a\u0941\u0924\u0941\u0935\u093e\u0930  / \u092e\u0939\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0928 ", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341212_\u0938\u092c\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0917\u092e\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341212_\u0938\u092c\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0917\u092e\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342136_\u0938\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0924\u093e \u092e\u0939\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342136_\u0938\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0924\u093e \u092e\u0939\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342157_\u0936\u0941\u0936\u093f\u0932\u093e \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342157_\u0936\u0941\u0936\u093f\u0932\u093e \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340236_\u0935\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u0916\u0921\u094d\u0917\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340236_\u0935\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u0916\u0921\u094d\u0917\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342087_\u0924\u0941\u0932\u0938\u093e \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342087_\u0924\u0941\u0932\u0938\u093e \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342052_\u092e\u0941\u0928\u093e \u0928\u094d\u092f\u094c\u092a\u093e\u0928\u0947 (\u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0947)": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342052_\u092e\u0941\u0928\u093e \u0928\u094d\u092f\u094c\u092a\u093e\u0928\u0947 (\u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0947)", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340930_\u092a\u0902\u091a \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092e\u093e\u0928\u0928\u094d\u0927\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340930_\u092a\u0902\u091a \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092e\u093e\u0928\u0928\u094d\u0927\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341704_\u0938\u0941\u092e\u093f\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093e \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341704_\u0938\u0941\u092e\u093f\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093e \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341473_\u091c\u0941\u0927\u094d\u200d\u0926 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341473_\u091c\u0941\u0927\u094d\u200d\u0926 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341750_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0918\u093f\u092e\u093f\u0930\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341750_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0918\u093f\u092e\u093f\u0930\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341786_\u092a\u0941\u0928 \u092e\u093e\u092f\u093e \u092e\u0939\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341786_\u092a\u0941\u0928 \u092e\u093e\u092f\u093e \u092e\u0939\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341909_\u092e\u0927\u0941 \u0938\u0941\u0926\u0928 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341909_\u092e\u0927\u0941 \u0938\u0941\u0926\u0928 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340582_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u094b\u091c\u0941": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340582_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u094b\u091c\u0941", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340381_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0941 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340381_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0941 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339608_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0930\u0940 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u091c\u093e\u092a\u0924\u0940 ": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339608_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0930\u0940 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u091c\u093e\u092a\u0924\u0940 ", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340712_\u092c\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0916\u093e\u0907\u0924\u0941": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340712_\u092c\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0916\u093e\u0907\u0924\u0941", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339484_\u0938\u0941\u091c\u093f\u0924\u093e \u092c\u0941\u0922\u093e\u0925\u094b\u0915\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339484_\u0938\u0941\u091c\u093f\u0924\u093e \u092c\u0941\u0922\u093e\u0925\u094b\u0915\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340558_\u0926\u0936\u0930\u0925 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340558_\u0926\u0936\u0930\u0925 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339793_\u0938\u0941\u0926\u093f\u092a \u0928\u094d\u092f\u094c\u092a\u093e\u0928\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339793_\u0938\u0941\u0926\u093f\u092a \u0928\u094d\u092f\u094c\u092a\u093e\u0928\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339585_\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0923\u0941 \u0930\u093e\u092e \u0926\u0941\u092e\u0930\u0941": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339585_\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0923\u0941 \u0930\u093e\u092e \u0926\u0941\u092e\u0930\u0941", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340295_\u092a\u0941\u0928\u094d\u092f \u0930\u093e\u092e \u0938\u0941\u0935\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340295_\u092a\u0941\u0928\u094d\u092f \u0930\u093e\u092e \u0938\u0941\u0935\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341524_\u0906\u0928\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341524_\u0906\u0928\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340544_\u0938\u093e\u091c\u0928 \u0922\u0915\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340544_\u0938\u093e\u091c\u0928 \u0922\u0915\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339821_\u0935\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339821_\u0935\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341784_\u0905\u0930\u094d\u091a\u0928\u093e \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f\u0930\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341784_\u0905\u0930\u094d\u091a\u0928\u093e \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f\u0930\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341955_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0932\u093e\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341955_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0932\u093e\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341578_\u0938\u0935\u093f\u0928 \u092e\u0939\u0924": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341578_\u0938\u0935\u093f\u0928 \u092e\u0939\u0924", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341977_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0935\u0923 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341977_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0935\u0923 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339987_\u0913\u092e \u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u091f\u0941": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339987_\u0913\u092e \u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u091f\u0941", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341543_\u0930\u0947\u0923\u0941 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341543_\u0930\u0947\u0923\u0941 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340897_\u0928\u0935\u093f\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0924": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340897_\u0928\u0935\u093f\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0924", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339691_\u0932\u0915\u094d\u0937\u094d\u092e\u0940 \u0935\u093e\u0938\u094d\u0924\u094b\u0932\u093e \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339691_\u0932\u0915\u094d\u0937\u094d\u092e\u0940 \u0935\u093e\u0938\u094d\u0924\u094b\u0932\u093e \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342010_\u0905\u0928\u093f\u0924\u093e \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f\u0930\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342010_\u0905\u0928\u093f\u0924\u093e \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f\u0930\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341659_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0926\u093f\u092a \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u0941\u092a\u093e\u0916\u0947\u0924\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341659_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0926\u093f\u092a \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u0941\u092a\u093e\u0916\u0947\u0924\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339415_\u092e\u0927\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u0938\u093e\u0939\u0941\u0916\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339415_\u092e\u0927\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u0938\u093e\u0939\u0941\u0916\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339425_\u0936\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092e \u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0927\u0941\u0916\u094d\u0935\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339425_\u0936\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092e \u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0927\u0941\u0916\u094d\u0935\u093e", "\u092a\u093f\u092a\u0941\u0932 \u092b\u0930\u094d\u0937\u094d\u091f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u092a\u093f\u092a\u0941\u0932 \u092b\u0930\u094d\u0937\u094d\u091f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341525_\u0917\u0923\u0947\u0936 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0935\u0932 \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341525_\u0917\u0923\u0947\u0936 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0935\u0932 \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341309_\u0930\u093e\u0927\u093e \u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u092c\u0938\u094d\u0928\u0947\u0924": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341309_\u0930\u093e\u0927\u093e \u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u092c\u0938\u094d\u0928\u0947\u0924", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340253_\u0905\u0936\u094b\u0915 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340253_\u0905\u0936\u094b\u0915 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341458_\u0938\u0930\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092c\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341458_\u0938\u0930\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092c\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341009_\u0927\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0930\u093e\u091c \u092c\u094b\u0939\u0930\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341009_\u0927\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0930\u093e\u091c \u092c\u094b\u0939\u0930\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341205_\u0935\u093f\u0936\u093e\u0932 \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341205_\u0935\u093f\u0936\u093e\u0932 \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342281_\u0938\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093f\u0932\u093e \u092c\u0941\u0922\u093e\u0925\u094b\u0915\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342281_\u0938\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093f\u0932\u093e \u092c\u0941\u0922\u093e\u0925\u094b\u0915\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341264_\u0921\u093e\u0932 \u0928\u093e\u0925 \u0924\u093f\u092e\u0932\u094d\u0938\u093f\u0928\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341264_\u0921\u093e\u0932 \u0928\u093e\u0925 \u0924\u093f\u092e\u0932\u094d\u0938\u093f\u0928\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341406_\u092d\u0930\u0924 \u0926\u0941\u0932\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341406_\u092d\u0930\u0924 \u0926\u0941\u0932\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340547_\u0924\u093f\u0932\u0915 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092d\u0947\u093e\u0932\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340547_\u0924\u093f\u0932\u0915 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092d\u0947\u093e\u0932\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340322_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0916\u0921\u094d\u0915\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340322_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0916\u0921\u094d\u0915\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342477_\u0926\u0947\u092c\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0938\u093f\u0939\u0902": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342477_\u0926\u0947\u092c\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0938\u093f\u0939\u0902", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339805_\u0909\u092e\u0919\u094d\u0917 \u0915\u0947.\u0938\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339805_\u0909\u092e\u0919\u094d\u0917 \u0915\u0947.\u0938\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342324_\u092e\u0902\u0917\u0932 \u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342324_\u092e\u0902\u0917\u0932 \u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340269_\u092c\u093e\u092c\u0941 \u0930\u093e\u091c \u092c\u091c\u094d\u0930\u093e\u091a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340269_\u092c\u093e\u092c\u0941 \u0930\u093e\u091c \u092c\u091c\u094d\u0930\u093e\u091a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341923_\u0913\u092e \u0930\u093e\u091c \u092c\u091c\u094d\u0930\u093e\u091a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341923_\u0913\u092e \u0930\u093e\u091c \u092c\u091c\u094d\u0930\u093e\u091a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341986_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0916\u0921\u094d\u0915\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341986_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0916\u0921\u094d\u0915\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341854_\u0930\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0905\u092e\u093e\u0924\u094d\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341854_\u0930\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0905\u092e\u093e\u0924\u094d\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340528_\u0930\u092c\u093f\u0930\u093e\u091c \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340528_\u0930\u092c\u093f\u0930\u093e\u091c \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341924_\u0905\u0936\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341924_\u0905\u0936\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340941_\u0930\u0941\u092a\u0947\u0938 \u0936\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340941_\u0930\u0941\u092a\u0947\u0938 \u0936\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341544_\u0905\u0928\u094d\u091c\u0941 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u0928\u094d\u091c\u0940\u0924 (\u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e)": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341544_\u0905\u0928\u094d\u091c\u0941 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u0928\u094d\u091c\u0940\u0924 (\u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e)", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342115_\u0930\u093e\u0927\u0947 \u0936\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092e \u0916\u0921\u094d\u0915\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342115_\u0930\u093e\u0927\u0947 \u0936\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092e \u0916\u0921\u094d\u0915\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341858_\u092c\u093f\u092e\u0930\u094d\u0936 \u092e\u093f\u0936\u094d\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341858_\u092c\u093f\u092e\u0930\u094d\u0936 \u092e\u093f\u0936\u094d\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340906_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340906_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342122_\u091c\u0940\u0935\u0928 \u0932\u093e\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342122_\u091c\u0940\u0935\u0928 \u0932\u093e\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341883_\u092f\u0941\u0935\u0930\u093e\u091c \u091a\u094c\u0932\u093e\u0917\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341883_\u092f\u0941\u0935\u0930\u093e\u091c \u091a\u094c\u0932\u093e\u0917\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340908_\u0906\u0938\u093e \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340908_\u0906\u0938\u093e \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339436_\u0921\u093f\u0932\u094d\u0932\u0940\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0928\u094d\u092f\u094c\u092a\u093e\u0928\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339436_\u0921\u093f\u0932\u094d\u0932\u0940\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0928\u094d\u092f\u094c\u092a\u093e\u0928\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341614_\u0909\u092e\u0947\u0938 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341614_\u0909\u092e\u0947\u0938 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341827_\u0938\u0940\u0924\u093e \u0930\u093e\u092e \u092e\u0948\u0928\u093e\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341827_\u0938\u0940\u0924\u093e \u0930\u093e\u092e \u092e\u0948\u0928\u093e\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342279_\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u0923\u0941 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342279_\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u0923\u0941 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341536_\u0917\u0923\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341536_\u0917\u0923\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341904_\u0932\u0947\u0928\u093f\u0928  \u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u200d\u091f ": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341904_\u0932\u0947\u0928\u093f\u0928  \u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u200d\u091f ", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341738_\u0915\u0947\u0936\u0935\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0924\u093f\u092e\u0932\u094d\u0938\u093f\u0928\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341738_\u0915\u0947\u0936\u0935\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0924\u093f\u092e\u0932\u094d\u0938\u093f\u0928\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340889_\u0921\u093e\u0915 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0917\u094c\u0924\u092e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340889_\u0921\u093e\u0915 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0917\u094c\u0924\u092e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342013_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342013_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341521_\u092a\u0926\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341521_\u092a\u0926\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342280_\u0938\u093e\u0928\u0941 \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342280_\u0938\u093e\u0928\u0941 \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342515_\u0935\u093f\u091c\u0941 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342515_\u0935\u093f\u091c\u0941 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342557_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0915 \u0922\u0915\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342557_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0915 \u0922\u0915\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341261_\u0938\u0941\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u0930 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341261_\u0938\u0941\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u0930 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340560_\u091f\u093f\u0915\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091a\u094c\u0932\u093e\u0917\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340560_\u091f\u093f\u0915\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091a\u094c\u0932\u093e\u0917\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339946_\u092e\u0920\u0941 \u092a\u0941\u0932\u093e\u092e\u0940 \u092e\u0917\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339946_\u092e\u0920\u0941 \u092a\u0941\u0932\u093e\u092e\u0940 \u092e\u0917\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339598_\u0905\u092e\u093f\u0915 \u092a\u0930\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339598_\u0905\u092e\u093f\u0915 \u092a\u0930\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342266_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u092e\u093f\u0932\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0916\u0924\u093f\u0935\u0921\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342266_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u092e\u093f\u0932\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0916\u0924\u093f\u0935\u0921\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341336_\u091c\u094d\u091e\u093e\u0928 \u0938\u093e\u0917\u0930 \u0932\u093e\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341336_\u091c\u094d\u091e\u093e\u0928 \u0938\u093e\u0917\u0930 \u0932\u093e\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339819_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092c\u094b\u0917\u091f\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339819_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092c\u094b\u0917\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340316_\u0905\u092e\u0930 \u0926\u0902\u0917\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340316_\u0905\u092e\u0930 \u0926\u0902\u0917\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341219_\u0938\u0941\u0936\u093f\u0932\u093e \u0938\u0941\u0935\u0947\u0926\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341219_\u0938\u0941\u0936\u093f\u0932\u093e \u0938\u0941\u0935\u0947\u0926\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339354_\u0930\u093e\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339354_\u0930\u093e\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341351_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0916\u0921\u094d\u0915\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341351_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0916\u0921\u094d\u0915\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341910_\u0938\u093f\u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u092f\u093e \u092c\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341910_\u0938\u093f\u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u092f\u093e \u092c\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339957_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0924\u093f\u0915\u094d\u0937\u093e \u092c\u093e\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339957_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0924\u093f\u0915\u094d\u0937\u093e \u092c\u093e\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341191_\u0905\u092e\u0943\u0924 \u092c\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341191_\u0905\u092e\u0943\u0924 \u092c\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339798_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0923 \u0930\u093e\u092e \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339798_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0923 \u0930\u093e\u092e \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340022_\u0930\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u0906\u091a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340022_\u0930\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u0906\u091a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342517_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342517_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342247_\u0936\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092e \u0935\u093e\u0935\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342247_\u0936\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092e \u0935\u093e\u0935\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342201_\u0938\u0930\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u0936\u0935\u093e\u0939\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342201_\u0938\u0930\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u0936\u0935\u093e\u0939\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340648_\u0938\u0902\u091c\u0940\u0935 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340648_\u0938\u0902\u091c\u0940\u0935 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341253_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u0915\u0943\u0924 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341253_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u0915\u0943\u0924 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342600_\u0905\u092e\u0943\u0924\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342600_\u0905\u092e\u0943\u0924\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342581_\u0905\u092d\u093f\u0937\u0947\u0915 \u092e\u093f\u0936\u094d\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342581_\u0905\u092d\u093f\u0937\u0947\u0915 \u092e\u093f\u0936\u094d\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339799_\u0932\u0915\u094d\u0937\u094d\u200d\u092e\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339799_\u0932\u0915\u094d\u0937\u094d\u200d\u092e\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342420_\u0926\u093f\u0928\u0947\u0936 \u0930\u093e\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342420_\u0926\u093f\u0928\u0947\u0936 \u0930\u093e\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341900_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0941 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0941\u0916\u093f\u092f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341900_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0941 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092e\u0941\u0916\u093f\u092f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341625_\u092e\u0943\u0923\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0936\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341625_\u092e\u0943\u0923\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0936\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342658_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0938\u0947\u0935\u0915 \u0930\u093e\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342658_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0938\u0947\u0935\u0915 \u0930\u093e\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340987_\u092c\u093f\u092c\u0947\u0915 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340987_\u092c\u093f\u092c\u0947\u0915 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342375_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0928\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342375_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0928\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341766_\u0930\u093e\u0927\u0947\u0936\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092e \u0938\u093e\u0939 \u0924\u0947\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341766_\u0930\u093e\u0927\u0947\u0936\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092e \u0938\u093e\u0939 \u0924\u0947\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342113_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0928\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u0930\u093e\u092f  \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342113_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0928\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u0930\u093e\u092f  \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341454_\u0908\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u0941 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0917\u0941\u092a\u094d\u200d\u0924\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341454_\u0908\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u0941 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0917\u0941\u092a\u094d\u200d\u0924\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342640_\u0936\u092e\u094d\u092d\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342640_\u0936\u092e\u094d\u092d\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341176_\u0926\u093f\u0928\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341176_\u0926\u093f\u0928\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342159_\u092e\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342159_\u092e\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342449_\u0930\u0935\u093f \u0905\u0930\u094d\u091a\u0928\u092e\u094d \u0935\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342449_\u0930\u0935\u093f \u0905\u0930\u094d\u091a\u0928\u092e\u094d \u0935\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342313_\u0926\u093f\u0932\u093f\u092a \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091c\u0948\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342313_\u0926\u093f\u0932\u093f\u092a \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091c\u0948\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340551_\u092e\u094b. \u0907\u092e\u094d\u0930\u093e\u0928 \u0905\u0938\u0932\u092e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340551_\u092e\u094b. \u0907\u092e\u094d\u0930\u093e\u0928 \u0905\u0938\u0932\u092e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339885_\u0936\u0947\u0916 \u0930\u093e\u0939\u093f\u0932 \u0905\u0939\u092e\u0926": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339885_\u0936\u0947\u0916 \u0930\u093e\u0939\u093f\u0932 \u0905\u0939\u092e\u0926", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342564_\u092e\u094b. \u0928\u0938\u093f\u092e \u0905\u0916\u094d\u0924\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342564_\u092e\u094b. \u0928\u0938\u093f\u092e \u0905\u0916\u094d\u0924\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342397_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092c\u0948\u0920\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342397_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092c\u0948\u0920\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341832_\u091c\u0948\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u0936\u0935\u093e\u0939\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341832_\u091c\u0948\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u0936\u0935\u093e\u0939\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340016_\u0936\u0947\u0916 \u092e\u0939\u092e\u0926 \u0907\u092b\u0930\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340016_\u0936\u0947\u0916 \u092e\u0939\u092e\u0926 \u0907\u092b\u0930\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342091_\u0936\u0947\u0916 \u092e\u0941\u0938\u094d\u0924\u093e\u0915": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342091_\u0936\u0947\u0916 \u092e\u0941\u0938\u094d\u0924\u093e\u0915", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342622_\u092e\u094b. \u092b\u093f\u0930\u094b\u091c \u0905\u0916\u094d\u0924\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342622_\u092e\u094b. \u092b\u093f\u0930\u094b\u091c \u0905\u0916\u094d\u0924\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342348_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0915\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092a\u091f\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342348_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0915\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092a\u091f\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342526_\u0936\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092e\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u0938\u093e\u0939 \u0924\u0947\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342526_\u0936\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092e\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u0938\u093e\u0939 \u0924\u0947\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342242_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u091c\u0928\u094d\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342242_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u091c\u0928\u094d\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341862_\u0935\u093f\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939 \u0924\u0947\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341862_\u0935\u093f\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939 \u0924\u0947\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340458_\u092a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u091f\u0941 \u0926\u093e\u0938 \u0924\u0924\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340458_\u092a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u091f\u0941 \u0926\u093e\u0938 \u0924\u0924\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342421_\u0927\u093f\u0930\u091c \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342421_\u0927\u093f\u0930\u091c \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342633_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u092d\u0941 \u0930\u093e\u092f \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342633_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u092d\u0941 \u0930\u093e\u092f \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342514_\u0939\u093f\u0930\u093e\u092e\u0924\u0940 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0915\u094b\u0907\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342514_\u0939\u093f\u0930\u093e\u092e\u0924\u0940 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0915\u094b\u0907\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342106_\u0936\u093f\u0935 \u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0936\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342106_\u0936\u093f\u0935 \u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0936\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341637_\u091b\u0935\u093f\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341637_\u091b\u0935\u093f\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341795_\u092d\u094b\u0932\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0947\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341795_\u092d\u094b\u0932\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0947\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339594_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0936 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339594_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0936 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342442_\u0909\u092a\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u0902\u0921\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u094d\u0939\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342442_\u0909\u092a\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u0902\u0921\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u094d\u0939\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342620_\u0939\u0930\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u092f \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342620_\u0939\u0930\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u092f \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342484_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923\u093e \u0930\u093e\u092e \u091a\u092e\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342484_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923\u093e \u0930\u093e\u092e \u091a\u092e\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342637_\u0926\u0930\u094b\u0917\u093e \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342637_\u0926\u0930\u094b\u0917\u093e \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342053_\u092c\u093f\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342053_\u092c\u093f\u091c\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342612_\u092d\u093e\u0917\u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0930\u093e\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342612_\u092d\u093e\u0917\u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0930\u093e\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342648_\u0936\u0947\u0916 \u0913\u0938\u0940 \u092e\u0939\u092e\u0926": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342648_\u0936\u0947\u0916 \u0913\u0938\u0940 \u092e\u0939\u092e\u0926", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342187_\u092a\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0924 \u0930\u093e\u092e \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342187_\u092a\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0924 \u0930\u093e\u092e \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342580_\u092d\u0930\u0924 \u0930\u093e\u092f \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342580_\u092d\u0930\u0924 \u0930\u093e\u092f \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342532_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092c\u0948\u0920\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342532_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092c\u0948\u0920\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341430_\u0928\u0947\u091c\u093e\u092e \u092e\u0902\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341430_\u0928\u0947\u091c\u093e\u092e \u092e\u0902\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342672_\u091c\u0939\u0941\u0930 \u0906\u0932\u092e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342672_\u091c\u0939\u0941\u0930 \u0906\u0932\u092e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342547_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342547_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0930\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340392_\u0932\u093e\u0932\u092c\u093e\u092c\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u0936\u0935\u093e\u0939\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340392_\u0932\u093e\u0932\u092c\u093e\u092c\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u0936\u0935\u093e\u0939\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342603_\u0930\u0924\u0928\u0947\u0936 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b \u0915\u094b\u0907\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342603_\u0930\u0924\u0928\u0947\u0936 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b \u0915\u094b\u0907\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342207_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092a\u091f\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342207_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092a\u091f\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341681_\u092c\u0948\u091c\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092a\u091f\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341681_\u092c\u0948\u091c\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092a\u091f\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341934_\u0915\u093f\u0930\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u092b\u0932\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341934_\u0915\u093f\u0930\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u092b\u0932\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342012_\u0917\u094c\u0924\u092e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342012_\u0917\u094c\u0924\u092e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341276_\u0938\u092e\u0938\u0941\u0928 \u0916\u093e\u0924\u0941\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341276_\u0938\u092e\u0938\u0941\u0928 \u0916\u093e\u0924\u0941\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340274_\u091c\u093e\u0939\u093e\u0928\u093e \u0916\u093e\u0924\u0941\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340274_\u091c\u093e\u0939\u093e\u0928\u093e \u0916\u093e\u0924\u0941\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340343_\u092a\u0935\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340343_\u092a\u0935\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341447_\u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915\u093e \u0932\u093e\u0932 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341447_\u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915\u093e \u0932\u093e\u0932 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341901_\u0905\u0928\u094d\u091c\u0941 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341901_\u0905\u0928\u094d\u091c\u0941 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342121_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u092e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092a\u093e\u0920\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342121_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u092e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092a\u093e\u0920\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340484_\u092e\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340484_\u092e\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341602_\u0909\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u0926\u093e\u0939\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341602_\u0909\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u0926\u093e\u0939\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340313_\u0932\u0915\u094d\u0937\u094d\u092e\u0940\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340313_\u0932\u0915\u094d\u0937\u094d\u092e\u0940\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340048_\u0938\u0941\u091c\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0917\u094c\u0924\u092e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340048_\u0938\u0941\u091c\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0917\u094c\u0924\u092e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341845_\u0938\u092e\u093f\u0930 \u092c\u093e\u092c\u0941 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341845_\u0938\u092e\u093f\u0930 \u092c\u093e\u092c\u0941 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342190_\u0938\u094b\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0924\u093f\u092e\u0932\u0938\u0940\u0928\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342190_\u0938\u094b\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0924\u093f\u092e\u0932\u0938\u0940\u0928\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342243_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u093e \u0932\u093e\u0932 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342243_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u093e \u0932\u093e\u0932 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340694_\u0939\u0930\u093f\u0939\u0930 \u092e\u0941\u0916\u093f\u092f\u093e \u092c\u093f\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340694_\u0939\u0930\u093f\u0939\u0930 \u092e\u0941\u0916\u093f\u092f\u093e \u092c\u093f\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341984_\u091c\u093f\u0924\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092c\u0940\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341984_\u091c\u093f\u0924\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092c\u0940\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340199_\u0915\u0941\u0938\u0941\u092e \u0916\u093e\u0924\u0941\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340199_\u0915\u0941\u0938\u0941\u092e \u0916\u093e\u0924\u0941\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341991_\u091c\u092f \u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0947\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341991_\u091c\u092f \u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0947\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342080_\u0932\u0915\u094d\u0937\u094d\u092e\u0940 \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342080_\u0932\u0915\u094d\u0937\u094d\u092e\u0940 \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342507_\u092c\u093f\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0916\u0930\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342507_\u092c\u093f\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0916\u0930\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342330_\u0930\u092c\u093f\u0928\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342330_\u0930\u092c\u093f\u0928\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341067_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u092e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e \u0916\u0921\u0915\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341067_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u092e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e \u0916\u0921\u0915\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342572_\u0938\u0940\u092e\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0924\u093f\u092e\u093f\u0932\u094d\u0938\u0947\u0928\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342572_\u0938\u0940\u092e\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0924\u093f\u092e\u093f\u0932\u094d\u0938\u0947\u0928\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342694_\u0930\u094b\u0936\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0909\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0924\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342694_\u0930\u094b\u0936\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0909\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0924\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341322_\u0938\u0941\u0927\u093f\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341322_\u0938\u0941\u0927\u093f\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342649_\u0908\u0928\u094d\u091c\u093e\u0926 \u0905\u0902\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342649_\u0908\u0928\u094d\u091c\u093e\u0926 \u0905\u0902\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341654_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u092c\u0932\u0940 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341654_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u092c\u0932\u0940 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342436_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342436_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342540_\u0926\u093f\u0928\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342540_\u0926\u093f\u0928\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342382_\u092e\u0941\u0930\u0932\u0940 \u092e\u0928\u094b\u0939\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342382_\u092e\u0941\u0930\u0932\u0940 \u092e\u0928\u094b\u0939\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341726_\u091c\u093e\u0932\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341726_\u091c\u093e\u0932\u0928\u094d\u200d\u0926\u0930 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342406_\u092e\u0941\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u0936\u0935\u093e\u0939\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342406_\u092e\u0941\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u0936\u0935\u093e\u0939\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342226_\u0905\u0928\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342226_\u0905\u0928\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341842_\u0928\u0917\u093f\u0928\u093e \u0926\u0947\u092c\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341842_\u0928\u0917\u093f\u0928\u093e \u0926\u0947\u092c\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342360_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u092f\u093e\u0917 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342360_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u092f\u093e\u0917 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341595_\u091b\u094b\u091f\u0947\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341595_\u091b\u094b\u091f\u0947\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342332_\u091c\u093e\u0932\u092e\u0939\u092e\u0926 \u0905\u0902\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342332_\u091c\u093e\u0932\u092e\u0939\u092e\u0926 \u0905\u0902\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340498_\u0930\u093e\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939 \u0915\u093e\u0928\u0941": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340498_\u0930\u093e\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939 \u0915\u093e\u0928\u0941", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340690_\u0938\u0935\u093f\u0928\u093e \u0917\u094b\u0932\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340690_\u0938\u0935\u093f\u0928\u093e \u0917\u094b\u0932\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341372_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094b\u0937 \u092a\u0902\u0921\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u094d\u0939\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341372_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094b\u0937 \u092a\u0902\u0921\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u094d\u0939\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339303_\u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u0938\u0941\u0935\u0947\u0926\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339303_\u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u0938\u0941\u0935\u0947\u0926\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341736_\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092e\u0941\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341736_\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092e\u0941\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339878_\u0938\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0932 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339878_\u0938\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0932 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341522_\u0909\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0935\u0924\u0940 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341522_\u0909\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0935\u0924\u0940 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341693_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e \u0938\u0941\u0935\u0947\u0926\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341693_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e \u0938\u0941\u0935\u0947\u0926\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342398_\u092d\u094b\u0932\u093e \u092e\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0901": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342398_\u092d\u094b\u0932\u093e \u092e\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0901", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342465_\u0928\u093f\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342465_\u0928\u093f\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340895_\u0938\u0902\u091c\u0941 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340895_\u0938\u0902\u091c\u0941 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340221_\u0905\u0938\u0930\u093e\u0930 \u0906\u0932\u092e \u0920\u0915\u0941\u0930\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340221_\u0905\u0938\u0930\u093e\u0930 \u0906\u0932\u092e \u0920\u0915\u0941\u0930\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340118_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0926\u0947\u0935 \u0930\u093e\u092e \u0926\u0941\u0938\u093e\u0926": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340118_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0926\u0947\u0935 \u0930\u093e\u092e \u0926\u0941\u0938\u093e\u0926", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342183_\u0938\u093e\u0915\u093f\u092c \u0906\u0932\u092e \u092e\u0902\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342183_\u0938\u093e\u0915\u093f\u092c \u0906\u0932\u092e \u092e\u0902\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341962_\u0927\u093f\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341962_\u0927\u093f\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341815_\u092c\u0948\u0927\u0928\u093e\u0925 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341815_\u092c\u0948\u0927\u0928\u093e\u0925 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342206_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0915 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342206_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0915 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342435_\u0928\u0938\u093f\u092e\u093e \u0916\u093e\u0924\u0941\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342435_\u0928\u0938\u093f\u092e\u093e \u0916\u093e\u0924\u0941\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342064_\u0936\u092e\u094d\u200d\u092d\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342064_\u0936\u092e\u094d\u200d\u092d\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341857_\u0909\u0937\u093e \u092c\u0941\u0922\u093e\u0925\u094b\u0915\u0940 (\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0908)": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341857_\u0909\u0937\u093e \u092c\u0941\u0922\u093e\u0925\u094b\u0915\u0940 (\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0908)", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340957_\u092d\u0947\u0916\u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093e\u0939 \u0924\u0947\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340957_\u092d\u0947\u0916\u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093e\u0939 \u0924\u0947\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342454_\u0935\u093f\u092e\u0932\u093e \u0916\u0924\u093f\u0935\u0921\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342454_\u0935\u093f\u092e\u0932\u093e \u0916\u0924\u093f\u0935\u0921\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342475_\u092e\u0941\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u094c\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342475_\u092e\u0941\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u094c\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342542_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0926\u093f\u092a \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342542_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0926\u093f\u092a \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341896_\u092e\u094b\u0939\u0928 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091a\u094c\u0932\u093e\u0917\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341896_\u092e\u094b\u0939\u0928 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091a\u094c\u0932\u093e\u0917\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339719_\u092a\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0923 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092a\u0928\u094d\u0925": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339719_\u092a\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0923 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092a\u0928\u094d\u0925", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339656_\u092e\u0902\u0917\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u092a\u091f\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339656_\u092e\u0902\u0917\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u092a\u091f\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341781_\u0935\u093f\u0936\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341781_\u0935\u093f\u0936\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342267_\u092a\u0941\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342267_\u092a\u0941\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342518_\u092e. \u0938\u093e\u091c\u093f\u0926 \u0905\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342518_\u092e. \u0938\u093e\u091c\u093f\u0926 \u0905\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339816_\u0928\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339816_\u0928\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342078_\u0936\u093f\u0935 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0915\u094b\u0907\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342078_\u0936\u093f\u0935 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0915\u094b\u0907\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341098_\u0905\u0928\u093f\u0932 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341098_\u0905\u0928\u093f\u0932 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341958_\u0905\u092d\u093f\u0928\u093e\u0936 \u091a\u094c\u0930\u0938\u093f\u092f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341958_\u0905\u092d\u093f\u0928\u093e\u0936 \u091a\u094c\u0930\u0938\u093f\u092f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342545_\u0906\u0930\u094d\u092f\u0936\u0936\u093f\u0915\u0932\u093e \u0930\u093e\u0909\u0924": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342545_\u0906\u0930\u094d\u092f\u0936\u0936\u093f\u0915\u0932\u093e \u0930\u093e\u0909\u0924", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339781_\u0926\u0940\u092a \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092c\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339781_\u0926\u0940\u092a \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092c\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339697_\u0935\u093f\u0936\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u200d\u0921\u0947\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339697_\u0935\u093f\u0936\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u200d\u0921\u0947\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341699_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u092e \u092e\u0947\u0939\u0924\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341699_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u092e \u092e\u0947\u0939\u0924\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339566_\u0938\u0930\u094b\u091c \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339566_\u0938\u0930\u094b\u091c \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342025_\u0932\u0915\u094d\u0937\u094d\u200d\u092e\u0940 \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0917\u0941\u094d\u092a\u094d\u200d\u0924\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342025_\u0932\u0915\u094d\u0937\u094d\u200d\u092e\u0940 \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0917\u0941\u094d\u092a\u094d\u200d\u0924\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341822_\u0936\u093f\u0935 \u092c\u091a\u0928 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930 \u0932\u094b\u0939\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341822_\u0936\u093f\u0935 \u092c\u091a\u0928 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930 \u0932\u094b\u0939\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342437_\u0909\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093e\u0939 \u0924\u0947\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342437_\u0909\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093e\u0939 \u0924\u0947\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342381_\u0930\u092c\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342381_\u0930\u092c\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342352_\u0938\u0902\u0924\u094b\u0937 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342352_\u0938\u0902\u0924\u094b\u0937 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340096_\u0930\u093e\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u0939\u0928\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340096_\u0930\u093e\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u0939\u0928\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341603_\u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930\u0940 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341603_\u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930\u0940 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341855_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0938\u093e\u0939 \u0915\u093e\u0928\u0941": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341855_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0938\u093e\u0939 \u0915\u093e\u0928\u0941", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342478_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0923\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0917\u0940\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342478_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0923\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0917\u0940\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341638_\u092e\u0939\u0947\u0936 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b \u0927\u093e\u0928\u0941\u0915": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341638_\u092e\u0939\u0947\u0936 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b \u0927\u093e\u0928\u0941\u0915", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341894_\u0915\u093f\u0938\u092e\u0924\u0940 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341894_\u0915\u093f\u0938\u092e\u0924\u0940 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342112_\u0938\u093e\u0939\u0947\u0935 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0930\u093e\u092e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342112_\u0938\u093e\u0939\u0947\u0935 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0930\u093e\u092e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341767_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u0928\u0947\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091a\u094c\u0930\u0938\u093f\u092f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341767_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u0928\u0947\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091a\u094c\u0930\u0938\u093f\u092f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342328_\u0930\u094b\u0938\u0928 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0905\u0939\u093f\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342328_\u0930\u094b\u0938\u0928 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0905\u0939\u093f\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342482_\u0905\u091c\u093f\u091c \u092e\u093f\u092f\u093e \u0927\u0941\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342482_\u0905\u091c\u093f\u091c \u092e\u093f\u092f\u093e \u0927\u0941\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342429_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0926\u093f\u092a \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342429_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0926\u093f\u092a \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342326_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091a\u094c\u0939\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342326_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091a\u094c\u0939\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341980_\u092c\u0943\u091c\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091a\u094c\u0939\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341980_\u092c\u0943\u091c\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091a\u094c\u0939\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342277_\u0936\u0939\u093f\u0926 \u0905\u0902\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342277_\u0936\u0939\u093f\u0926 \u0905\u0902\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341866_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092c\u0930\u0948": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341866_\u0930\u093e\u092e\u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092c\u0930\u0948", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341609_\u0935\u0943\u091c \u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091a\u094c\u0930\u0938\u093f\u092f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341609_\u0935\u0943\u091c \u0915\u093f\u0936\u094b\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091a\u094c\u0930\u0938\u093f\u092f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342505_\u091c\u0948\u0928\u094b\u0926\u0940\u0928 \u092e\u093f\u092f\u093e \u0939\u0935\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342505_\u091c\u0948\u0928\u094b\u0926\u0940\u0928 \u092e\u093f\u092f\u093e \u0939\u0935\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342530_\u0936\u093f\u0935\u0936\u0902\u0915\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0930\u094c\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342530_\u0936\u093f\u0935\u0936\u0902\u0915\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0930\u094c\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341740_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u091c\u0940 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0928\u0941\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341740_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u091c\u0940 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0928\u0941\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342422_\u091f\u093f\u0915\u093e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0917\u0941\u0930\u0941\u0919": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342422_\u091f\u093f\u0915\u093e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0917\u0941\u0930\u0941\u0919", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342014_\u0917\u0940\u0924\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u092c\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342014_\u0917\u0940\u0924\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u092c\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342225_\u0908\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930\u0926\u0947\u0935 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342225_\u0908\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930\u0926\u0947\u0935 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342335_\u092a\u093e\u0930\u0938 \u0930\u093e\u0909\u0924 \u092c\u0930\u0948": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342335_\u092a\u093e\u0930\u0938 \u0930\u093e\u0909\u0924 \u092c\u0930\u0948", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341688_\u0909\u092e\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341688_\u0909\u092e\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342117_\u0915\u094b\u0930\u0948\u0938\u093e \u0916\u093e\u0924\u0941\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342117_\u0915\u094b\u0930\u0948\u0938\u093e \u0916\u093e\u0924\u0941\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341020_\u0932\u0941\u0915\u092e\u093e\u0928 \u092e\u093f\u092f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341020_\u0932\u0941\u0915\u092e\u093e\u0928 \u092e\u093f\u092f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340710_\u0938\u092e\u0938\u0941\u0932\u094d\u0939\u0915 \u092e\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0901 \u0927\u0941\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340710_\u0938\u092e\u0938\u0941\u0932\u094d\u0939\u0915 \u092e\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0901 \u0927\u0941\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340148_\u0938\u092c\u093f\u0930 \u0905\u0939\u092e\u0926": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340148_\u0938\u092c\u093f\u0930 \u0905\u0939\u092e\u0926", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342308_\u0915\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u093f \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0915\u0941\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342308_\u0915\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u093f \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0915\u0941\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341976_\u0938\u0902\u091c\u092f \u0930\u093f\u091c\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341976_\u0938\u0902\u091c\u092f \u0930\u093f\u091c\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340624_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0930\u0947\u0917\u094d\u092e\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340624_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0930\u0947\u0917\u094d\u092e\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340330_\u0938\u094c\u0930\u0935 \u0915\u0921\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340330_\u0938\u094c\u0930\u0935 \u0915\u0921\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339494_\u0907\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0938\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0919\u0924\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339494_\u0907\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0938\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0919\u0924\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340683_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091a\u093e\u092a\u093e\u0917\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340683_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091a\u093e\u092a\u093e\u0917\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342089_\u0936\u0902\u0915\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091c\u0948\u0938\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342089_\u0936\u0902\u0915\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091c\u0948\u0938\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342018_\u0930\u0935\u093f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342018_\u0930\u0935\u093f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341302_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0935\u093f\u0928 \u0938\u093e\u092a\u0915\u094b\u091f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341302_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0935\u093f\u0928 \u0938\u093e\u092a\u0915\u094b\u091f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339402_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0924\u093e\u092a \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939 \u0924\u092e\u093e\u0919\u094d\u0917": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339402_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0924\u093e\u092a \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939 \u0924\u092e\u093e\u0919\u094d\u0917", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339304_\u0907\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092e\u093e\u092f\u093e \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339304_\u0907\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092e\u093e\u092f\u093e \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341878_\u0930\u091e\u094d\u091c\u0928\u093e \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341878_\u0930\u091e\u094d\u091c\u0928\u093e \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339670_\u092e\u0927\u0941 \u092e\u093e\u092f\u093e \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339670_\u092e\u0927\u0941 \u092e\u093e\u092f\u093e \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940", " \u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u0928\u093e\u0917\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": " \u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u0928\u093e\u0917\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341743_\u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0940 \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932(\u0915\u093e\u092b\u094d\u0932\u0947)": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341743_\u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0940 \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932(\u0915\u093e\u092b\u094d\u0932\u0947)", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341286_\u0930\u094b\u0932 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0917\u0941\u0930\u0941\u0919\u094d\u0917": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341286_\u0930\u094b\u0932 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0917\u0941\u0930\u0941\u0919\u094d\u0917", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340532_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340532_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341807_\u0915\u0935\u093f\u0924\u093e \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f\u0930\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341807_\u0915\u0935\u093f\u0924\u093e \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f\u0930\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339310_\u091a\u0942\u0921\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0922\u0915\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339310_\u091a\u0942\u0921\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0922\u0915\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341552_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u092a\u094b\u0916\u0930\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341552_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u092a\u094b\u0916\u0930\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339439_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094b\u0937 \u0918\u093f\u092e\u093f\u0930\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339439_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094b\u0937 \u0918\u093f\u092e\u093f\u0930\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340548_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0909\u0924": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340548_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0909\u0924", "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u092e\u093e\u0928\u0935\u0924\u093e\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u092e\u093e\u0928\u0935\u0924\u093e\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339855_\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u0923\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0924\u093f\u0935\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339855_\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u0923\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0924\u093f\u0935\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341844_\u0935\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924 \u0930\u093e\u091c \u0918\u093f\u092e\u093f\u0930\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341844_\u0935\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924 \u0930\u093e\u091c \u0918\u093f\u092e\u093f\u0930\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341352_\u0928\u093f\u0930\u091e\u094d\u091c\u0928 \u0915\u094b\u0907\u0930\u093e\u0932\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341352_\u0928\u093f\u0930\u091e\u094d\u091c\u0928 \u0915\u094b\u0907\u0930\u093e\u0932\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340935_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0906\u091a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340935_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0906\u091a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341468_\u0928\u093f\u0930\u094d\u0926\u094b\u0937 \u0935\u093f\u0915\u094d\u0930\u092e \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341468_\u0928\u093f\u0930\u094d\u0926\u094b\u0937 \u0935\u093f\u0915\u094d\u0930\u092e \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932", "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u092e\u093e\u0924\u0943\u092d\u0942\u092e\u093f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u092e\u093e\u0924\u0943\u092d\u0942\u092e\u093f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0938\u0926\u094d\u092d\u093e\u0935\u0928\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0938\u0926\u094d\u092d\u093e\u0935\u0928\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339865_\u0926\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0917\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093e\u0901\u0935\u093e \u0932\u093f\u092e\u094d\u0935\u0941": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339865_\u0926\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0917\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0938\u093e\u0901\u0935\u093e \u0932\u093f\u092e\u094d\u0935\u0941", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340123_\u0917\u0923\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0916\u0930\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340123_\u0917\u0923\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0916\u0930\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339645_\u092f\u0941\u0935\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0938\u0902\u0917\u094d\u0930\u094c\u0932\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339645_\u092f\u0941\u0935\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0938\u0902\u0917\u094d\u0930\u094c\u0932\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340299_\u092a\u0941\u0923\u094d\u092f  \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0905\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091a\u093e\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340299_\u092a\u0941\u0923\u094d\u092f  \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0905\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091a\u093e\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341084_\u0930\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341084_\u0930\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341526_\u0905\u092d\u092f \u0930\u093e\u091c\u0935\u0902\u0936\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341526_\u0905\u092d\u092f \u0930\u093e\u091c\u0935\u0902\u0936\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341225_\u092e\u093e\u0928\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u0938\u0902\u0917\u094d\u0930\u094c\u0932\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341225_\u092e\u093e\u0928\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u0938\u0902\u0917\u094d\u0930\u094c\u0932\u093e", "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u092e\u094d\u092f\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u092e\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u094d\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 (\u092a\u0941\u0937\u094d\u092a\u0932\u093e\u0932)": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u092e\u094d\u092f\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u092e\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u094d\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 (\u092a\u0941\u0937\u094d\u092a\u0932\u093e\u0932)", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342097_\u0938\u093e\u091c\u0928 \u092e\u093e\u091d\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342097_\u0938\u093e\u091c\u0928 \u092e\u093e\u091d\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341042_\u0936\u094b\u092d\u093e \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341042_\u0936\u094b\u092d\u093e \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342521_\u0916\u0947\u092e\u0928\u093e\u0925 \u0936\u093f\u0935\u093e\u0915\u094b\u091f\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342521_\u0916\u0947\u092e\u0928\u093e\u0925 \u0936\u093f\u0935\u093e\u0915\u094b\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342687_\u0921\u092e\u094d\u0935\u0930 \u0936\u093e\u0939\u0941": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342687_\u0921\u092e\u094d\u0935\u0930 \u0936\u093e\u0939\u0941", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342498_\u092a\u0941\u0938\u094d\u0915\u0930 \u0916\u0924\u093f\u0935\u0921\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342498_\u092a\u0941\u0938\u094d\u0915\u0930 \u0916\u0924\u093f\u0935\u0921\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341971_\u0935\u093f\u092a\u0941\u0932 \u0917\u0941\u0930\u093e\u0917\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341971_\u0935\u093f\u092a\u0941\u0932 \u0917\u0941\u0930\u093e\u0917\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341581_\u0905\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0941\u0928 \u0938\u093e\u092a\u0915\u094b\u091f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341581_\u0905\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0941\u0928 \u0938\u093e\u092a\u0915\u094b\u091f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342192_\u0930\u091e\u094d\u091c\u0928\u093e \u0917\u094c\u0924\u092e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342192_\u0930\u091e\u094d\u091c\u0928\u093e \u0917\u094c\u0924\u092e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339787_\u092e\u093e\u0924\u0943\u0915\u093e \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f\u0930\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339787_\u092e\u093e\u0924\u0943\u0915\u093e \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f\u0930\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341230_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341230_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339562_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0915 \u0930\u093e\u091c \u091c\u094b\u0936\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339562_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0915 \u0930\u093e\u091c \u091c\u094b\u0936\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341418_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0947\u0936 \u0930\u093e\u0928\u093e\u092d\u093e\u091f \u0932\u094c\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341418_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0947\u0936 \u0930\u093e\u0928\u093e\u092d\u093e\u091f \u0932\u094c\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342096_\u0932\u0947\u0916 \u0928\u093e\u0925 \u0916\u0928\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342096_\u0932\u0947\u0916 \u0928\u093e\u0925 \u0916\u0928\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340823_\u0905\u0936\u094b\u0915 \u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340823_\u0905\u0936\u094b\u0915 \u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339676_\u0916\u093f\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u094d\u0937\u0947\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339676_\u0916\u093f\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u094d\u0937\u0947\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341013_\u0938\u093e\u0917\u0930 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e \u092e\u0917\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341013_\u0938\u093e\u0917\u0930 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e \u092e\u0917\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341273_\u0918\u0928 \u0936\u094d\u200d\u092f\u093e\u092e \u0917\u094c\u0924\u092e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341273_\u0918\u0928 \u0936\u094d\u200d\u092f\u093e\u092e \u0917\u094c\u0924\u092e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340242_\u091f\u094b\u092a \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340242_\u091f\u094b\u092a \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342043_\u091a\u0947\u0924\u0928 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092c\u0938\u094d\u0928\u0947\u0924": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342043_\u091a\u0947\u0924\u0928 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092c\u0938\u094d\u0928\u0947\u0924", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340700_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u092e\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092d\u0923\u094d\u200d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340700_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u092e\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092d\u0923\u094d\u200d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342105_\u0932\u0915\u094d\u0937\u094d\u092e\u0923 \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342105_\u0932\u0915\u094d\u0937\u094d\u092e\u0923 \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341115_\u092e\u0947\u0918 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0917\u093e\u0939\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341115_\u092e\u0947\u0918 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0917\u093e\u0939\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341702_\u092f\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341702_\u092f\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340910_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0938\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340910_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0938\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342009_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u094d\u092f \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0938\u094b\u0928\u0940 \u0938\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342009_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u094d\u092f \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0938\u094b\u0928\u0940 \u0938\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340500_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340500_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341064_\u0935\u093f\u092e\u0932 \u091c\u094d\u091e\u0935\u093e\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341064_\u0935\u093f\u092e\u0932 \u091c\u094d\u091e\u0935\u093e\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342008_\u092d\u093e\u0917\u093f\u0930\u0925 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342008_\u092d\u093e\u0917\u093f\u0930\u0925 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341456_\u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0939\u0930\u093f\u0915\u0932\u093e \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0940\u0938 \u092e\u0917\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341456_\u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0939\u0930\u093f\u0915\u0932\u093e \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0940\u0938 \u092e\u0917\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341785_\u0932\u094b\u0915 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092a\u0941\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341785_\u0932\u094b\u0915 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092a\u0941\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341383_\u092e\u093e\u0932\u0924\u093e \u0918\u093f\u092e\u093f\u0930\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341383_\u092e\u093e\u0932\u0924\u093e \u0918\u093f\u092e\u093f\u0930\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340753_\u0936\u094d\u0930\u0940 \u0916\u0941\u0935\u093f\u0930\u093e\u092e  \u0906\u091a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340753_\u0936\u094d\u0930\u0940 \u0916\u0941\u0935\u093f\u0930\u093e\u092e  \u0906\u091a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341038_\u092e\u0939\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u0918\u093f\u092e\u093f\u0930\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341038_\u092e\u0939\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u0918\u093f\u092e\u093f\u0930\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341096_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092a\u094b\u0916\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341096_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092a\u094b\u0916\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342038_\u0938\u0930\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0940 \u0932\u092e\u094d\u0938\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342038_\u0938\u0930\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0940 \u0932\u092e\u094d\u0938\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341821_\u0928\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0930\u093f\u091c\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341821_\u0928\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0930\u093f\u091c\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342114_\u092b\u0930\u094d\u0938\u0941\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0915\u0921\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342114_\u092b\u0930\u094d\u0938\u0941\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0915\u0921\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341214_\u092d\u0941\u092e\u093f\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0938\u093e\u092a\u0915\u094b\u091f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341214_\u092d\u0941\u092e\u093f\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0938\u093e\u092a\u0915\u094b\u091f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341558_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0947\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341558_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0947\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342414_\u0935\u093e\u091b\u093e \u0926\u0932\u0940 \u092e\u093f\u092f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342414_\u0935\u093e\u091b\u093e \u0926\u0932\u0940 \u092e\u093f\u092f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341921_\u0915\u094b\u0936\u0932 \u0905\u0930\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341921_\u0915\u094b\u0936\u0932 \u0905\u0930\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342019_\u0921\u093f\u0932\u094d\u0932\u0940 \u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u093e\u092b\u094d\u0932\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342019_\u0921\u093f\u0932\u094d\u0932\u0940 \u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u093e\u092b\u094d\u0932\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342234_\u092f\u0941\u0927\u094d\u0926 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0935\u093f\u0930\u0915\u091f\u094d\u091f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342234_\u092f\u0941\u0927\u094d\u0926 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0935\u093f\u0930\u0915\u091f\u094d\u091f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340850_\u092e\u094b\u0939\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u0935\u0930 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e \u092e\u0917\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340850_\u092e\u094b\u0939\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u0935\u0930 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e \u092e\u0917\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340496_\u0915\u0947\u0936\u0935 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0935\u0936\u094d\u200d\u092f\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340496_\u0915\u0947\u0936\u0935 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0935\u0936\u094d\u200d\u092f\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339782_\u0930\u0935\u093f \u0936\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339782_\u0930\u0935\u093f \u0936\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341541_\u0939\u093f\u092e\u093e\u0932 \u092d\u0941\u0938\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341541_\u0939\u093f\u092e\u093e\u0932 \u092d\u0941\u0938\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341993_\u092a\u092e\u094d\u092b\u093e \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341993_\u092a\u092e\u094d\u092b\u093e \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340462_\u0917\u094b\u0915\u0941\u0932 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340462_\u0917\u094b\u0915\u0941\u0932 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342227_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0941 \u0915\u0947.\u0938\u0940.": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342227_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0941 \u0915\u0947.\u0938\u0940.", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342450_\u0905\u0935\u093f\u0928\u093e\u0938 \u0938\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342450_\u0905\u0935\u093f\u0928\u093e\u0938 \u0938\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339612_\u092d\u0930\u0924 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0935\u0938\u094d\u0924\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339612_\u092d\u0930\u0924 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0935\u0938\u094d\u0924\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342562_\u092a\u0947\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u091c\u093e\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342562_\u092a\u0947\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u091c\u093e\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341355_\u0917\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0932\u093e\u092e\u093f\u091b\u093e\u0928\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341355_\u0917\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u0932\u093e\u092e\u093f\u091b\u093e\u0928\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342244_\u091f\u094b\u0932 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0932\u0941\u0902\u0917\u0947\u0932\u0940 \u092e\u0917\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342244_\u091f\u094b\u0932 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0932\u0941\u0902\u0917\u0947\u0932\u0940 \u092e\u0917\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340899_\u0938\u0936\u0940\u0932\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0915\u094b\u091f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340899_\u0938\u0936\u0940\u0932\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0915\u094b\u091f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340600_\u092d\u093f\u092e\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u093f \u092d\u0941\u0938\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340600_\u092d\u093f\u092e\u093e \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u093f \u092d\u0941\u0938\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339734_\u0927\u0930\u094d\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u0947.\u0938\u0940.": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339734_\u0927\u0930\u094d\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u0947.\u0938\u0940.", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342716_\u0926\u093f\u0928\u093e \u0928\u093e\u0925 \u0916\u0928\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342716_\u0926\u093f\u0928\u093e \u0928\u093e\u0925 \u0916\u0928\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342578_\u0915\u0947\u0936\u0935 \u0905\u0930\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342578_\u0915\u0947\u0936\u0935 \u0905\u0930\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341528_\u0917\u094b\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u092a\u0902\u0917\u0947\u0928\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341528_\u0917\u094b\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u092a\u0902\u0917\u0947\u0928\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339763_\u0936\u0902\u0915\u0930 \u0916\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339763_\u0936\u0902\u0915\u0930 \u0916\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342361_\u0938\u091a\u093f\u0928 \u0935\u093f.\u0915.": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342361_\u0938\u091a\u093f\u0928 \u0935\u093f.\u0915.", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342265_\u092e\u0939\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342265_\u092e\u0939\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341338_\u092e\u0915\u0938\u0941\u0926 \u0905\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341338_\u092e\u0915\u0938\u0941\u0926 \u0905\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342413_\u0938\u093e\u0917\u0930 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342413_\u0938\u093e\u0917\u0930 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342726_\u091f\u0947\u0915 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0935\u093f.\u0915": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342726_\u091f\u0947\u0915 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0935\u093f.\u0915", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339635_\u0917\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0938\u093e\u092a\u0915\u094b\u091f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339635_\u0917\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0938\u093e\u092a\u0915\u094b\u091f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339839_\u0936\u0928\u094d\u091c\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339839_\u0936\u0928\u094d\u091c\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340072_\u0938\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0938\u093e\u0939\u093f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340072_\u0938\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0938\u093e\u0939\u093f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341947_\u0932\u093f\u0932\u093e \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939 \u0930\u093e\u0928\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341947_\u0932\u093f\u0932\u093e \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939 \u0930\u093e\u0928\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339467_\u0936\u0941\u0936\u093f\u0932\u093e \u092a\u0941\u0932\u093e\u092e\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339467_\u0936\u0941\u0936\u093f\u0932\u093e \u092a\u0941\u0932\u093e\u092e\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340749_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0926\u093f\u092a \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340749_\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0926\u093f\u092a \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340819_\u092c\u0947\u0932 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340819_\u092c\u0947\u0932 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341891_\u0915\u0947\u0936\u0935 \u091f\u0923\u094d\u200d\u0921\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341891_\u0915\u0947\u0936\u0935 \u091f\u0923\u094d\u200d\u0921\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339480_\u0917\u094b\u0915\u0941\u0932 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339480_\u0917\u094b\u0915\u0941\u0932 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339644_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f\u0930\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339644_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f\u0930\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340852_\u0915\u092e\u0932\u093e \u0936\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340852_\u0915\u092e\u0932\u093e \u0936\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339512_\u092d\u093e\u0928\u0941\u092d\u0915\u094d\u0924 \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339512_\u092d\u093e\u0928\u0941\u092d\u0915\u094d\u0924 \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340095_\u0938\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0915\u0941\u0935\u0902\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340095_\u0938\u093f\u0924\u093e \u0915\u0941\u0935\u0902\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342231_\u0909\u0937\u093e \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f\u0930\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342231_\u0909\u0937\u093e \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f\u0930\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340155_\u0915\u092e\u0932\u093e \u092c\u094b\u0939\u0930\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340155_\u0915\u092e\u0932\u093e \u092c\u094b\u0939\u0930\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339495_\u092e\u0927\u0941\u0938\u0941\u0926\u0928 \u092a\u0928\u094d\u0925\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339495_\u092e\u0927\u0941\u0938\u0941\u0926\u0928 \u092a\u0928\u094d\u0925\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340723_\u091f\u093f\u0915\u093e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u094d\u0937\u0947\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340723_\u091f\u093f\u0915\u093e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u094d\u0937\u0947\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340132_\u0926\u093f\u0932\u0940\u092a \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340132_\u0926\u093f\u0932\u0940\u092a \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339600_\u092c\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u091c\u094d\u091e\u0935\u093e\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339600_\u092c\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u091c\u094d\u091e\u0935\u093e\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340082_\u0935\u093f\u092e\u0932\u093e \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f\u0930\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340082_\u0935\u093f\u092e\u0932\u093e \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f\u0930\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342024_\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u0923\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0935\u0938\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342024_\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u0923\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0935\u0938\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340021_\u091c\u0940\u0924 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0917\u0941\u092a\u094d\u200d\u0924\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340021_\u091c\u0940\u0924 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0917\u0941\u092a\u094d\u200d\u0924\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339399_\u0917\u094b\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339399_\u0917\u094b\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341851_\u092e\u0939\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341851_\u092e\u0939\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339761_\u0916\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0928\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u092d\u0941\u0937\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339761_\u0916\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0928\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u092d\u0941\u0937\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341671_\u0928\u092c\u093e\u092c \u092e\u0941\u0938\u0932\u092e\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341671_\u0928\u092c\u093e\u092c \u092e\u0941\u0938\u0932\u092e\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340783_\u0926\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0917\u093e \u0932\u093e\u0932 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340783_\u0926\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0917\u093e \u0932\u093e\u0932 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340456_\u0938\u091a\u093f\u0928 \u0930\u093e\u0928\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340456_\u0938\u091a\u093f\u0928 \u0930\u093e\u0928\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339830_\u091c\u094d\u091e\u093e\u0928 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092d\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0924\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339830_\u091c\u094d\u091e\u093e\u0928 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092d\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0924\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339560_\u0905\u0928\u094d\u091c\u0928\u093e \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339560_\u0905\u0928\u094d\u091c\u0928\u093e \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940 \u0925\u093e\u092a\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340170_\u092e\u094b\u0939\u092e\u094d\u092e\u0926\u092e\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0924\u091c\u093e \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340170_\u092e\u094b\u0939\u092e\u094d\u092e\u0926\u092e\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0924\u091c\u093e \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340537_\u0915\u0930\u092e \u0939\u0941\u0938\u0947\u0928 \u0916\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340537_\u0915\u0930\u092e \u0939\u0941\u0938\u0947\u0928 \u0916\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340841_\u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340841_\u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340408_\u0924\u0947\u091c\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092e\u0932\u094d\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340408_\u0924\u0947\u091c\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092e\u0932\u094d\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339899_\u0927\u0928 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092c\u0938\u094d\u0928\u0947\u0924": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339899_\u0927\u0928 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092c\u0938\u094d\u0928\u0947\u0924", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341444_\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u0923\u0941 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0928\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341444_\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u0923\u0941 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0928\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339982_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0915 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0926\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339982_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0915 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0926\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0940", "\u0917\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0927\u0940\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932": "\u0917\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0927\u0940\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341144_\u091c\u0941\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0924\u0940 \u0927\u0941\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e \u092e\u0941\u0938\u0932\u092e\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341144_\u091c\u0941\u092e\u0930\u093e\u0924\u0940 \u0927\u0941\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e \u092e\u0941\u0938\u0932\u092e\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342071_\u0935\u093f\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935 \u0928\u093e\u0925 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342071_\u0935\u093f\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935 \u0928\u093e\u0925 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340120_\u0930\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340120_\u0930\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341843_\u0930\u093e\u0927\u0947 \u0936\u094d\u200d\u092f\u093e\u092e \u0935\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341843_\u0930\u093e\u0927\u0947 \u0936\u094d\u200d\u092f\u093e\u092e \u0935\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342214_\u092e\u094b\u0939\u092e\u094d\u092e\u0926 \u0906\u0930\u093f\u092b \u092e\u0941\u0938\u0932\u092e\u093e\u0928 \u0916\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342214_\u092e\u094b\u0939\u092e\u094d\u092e\u0926 \u0906\u0930\u093f\u092b \u092e\u0941\u0938\u0932\u092e\u093e\u0928 \u0916\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342175_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342175_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u092f \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340184_\u0905\u0926\u093e\u0932\u0924 \u091a\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340184_\u0905\u0926\u093e\u0932\u0924 \u091a\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341010_\u0936\u0938\u093f\u0915\u0932\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0947\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341010_\u0936\u0938\u093f\u0915\u0932\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0947\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340754_\u091c\u092f \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0915\u093e\u092b\u094d\u0932\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340754_\u091c\u092f \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0915\u093e\u092b\u094d\u0932\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341780_\u091c\u0917\u0926\u0940\u0936 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341780_\u091c\u0917\u0926\u0940\u0936 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339340_\u092c\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339340_\u092c\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342378_\u0938\u0915\u093f\u0932 \u0905\u0939\u092e\u0926 \u0916\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342378_\u0938\u0915\u093f\u0932 \u0905\u0939\u092e\u0926 \u0916\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342026_\u092c\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924\u0940 \u091a\u092e\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342026_\u092c\u0938\u0928\u094d\u0924\u0940 \u091a\u092e\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341105_\u0932\u0915\u094d\u0937\u094d\u200d\u092e\u0923 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341105_\u0932\u0915\u094d\u0937\u094d\u200d\u092e\u0923 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339557_\u0935\u093f\u0915\u094d\u0930\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339557_\u0935\u093f\u0915\u094d\u0930\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339721_\u0927\u093f\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339721_\u0927\u093f\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340638_\u0906\u0936\u093f\u0937 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340638_\u0906\u0936\u093f\u0937 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339894_\u0915\u0948\u0938\u0930 \u091c\u0939\u093e \u092d\u0928\u094d\u0928\u0947 \u0938\u0915\u093f\u0928\u093e \u092e\u0941\u0938\u094d\u0932\u0940\u092e\u200b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339894_\u0915\u0948\u0938\u0930 \u091c\u0939\u093e \u092d\u0928\u094d\u0928\u0947 \u0938\u0915\u093f\u0928\u093e \u092e\u0941\u0938\u094d\u0932\u0940\u092e\u200b", "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u091c\u0928\u092e\u0924 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940": "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u091c\u0928\u092e\u0924 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340440_\u0936\u0902\u0915\u0930 \u092d\u093e\u091f\u0915\u094d\u0937\u0947\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340440_\u0936\u0902\u0915\u0930 \u092d\u093e\u091f\u0915\u094d\u0937\u0947\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341502_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0917\u094b\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341502_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0917\u094b\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342268_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0936\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342268_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0936\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340997_\u0928\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0935\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0935\u0947\u0932\u094d\u092c\u093e\u0938\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340997_\u0928\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0935\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0935\u0947\u0932\u094d\u092c\u093e\u0938\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341867_\u0915\u0932\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0923 \u091f\u0923\u094d\u200d\u0921\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341867_\u0915\u0932\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0923 \u091f\u0923\u094d\u200d\u0921\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342416_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u092d\u0941\u0938\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342416_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u092d\u0941\u0938\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342717_\u0927\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342717_\u0927\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340713_\u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092c\u0922\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340713_\u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092c\u0922\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340876_\u0935\u0941\u0926\u094d\u0927\u093f \u0928\u093e\u0925 \u092a\u094b\u0916\u0930\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340876_\u0935\u0941\u0926\u094d\u0927\u093f \u0928\u093e\u0925 \u092a\u094b\u0916\u0930\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341960_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u094d\u092f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092c\u0930\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341960_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u094d\u092f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092c\u0930\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342583_\u0905\u092c\u094d\u0926\u0941\u0932 \u0930\u0939\u092e\u093e\u0928 -": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342583_\u0905\u092c\u094d\u0926\u0941\u0932 \u0930\u0939\u092e\u093e\u0928 -", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341330_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0925\u093e\u0930\u0941": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341330_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0925\u093e\u0930\u0941", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339658_\u092e\u093e\u0927\u0935 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0916\u0928\u093e\u0932  (\u0909\u092a\u093e\u0927\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f)": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339658_\u092e\u093e\u0927\u0935 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0916\u0928\u093e\u0932  (\u0909\u092a\u093e\u0927\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f)", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341051_\u0905\u092c\u094d\u0926\u0941\u0932 \u0917\u092b\u094d\u092b\u093e\u0930 \u0905\u0928\u094d\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341051_\u0905\u092c\u094d\u0926\u0941\u0932 \u0917\u092b\u094d\u092b\u093e\u0930 \u0905\u0928\u094d\u0938\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341501_\u0905\u0930\u0941\u0923 \u0924\u093f\u0935\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341501_\u0905\u0930\u0941\u0923 \u0924\u093f\u0935\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340053_\u0938\u0930\u0924\u093e\u091c \u0905\u0939\u092e\u0926 \u092e\u0941": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340053_\u0938\u0930\u0924\u093e\u091c \u0905\u0939\u092e\u0926 \u092e\u0941", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340701_\u0935\u093f\u091c\u092f \u0928\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u091a\u094c\u0935\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340701_\u0935\u093f\u091c\u092f \u0928\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u091a\u094c\u0935\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340260_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340260_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340427_\u091f\u094b\u092e\u0928\u093e\u0925 \u0915\u0941\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340427_\u091f\u094b\u092e\u0928\u093e\u0925 \u0915\u0941\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339969_\u0930\u093e\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339969_\u0930\u093e\u0915\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340300_\u0924\u093e\u0930\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340300_\u0924\u093e\u0930\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341198_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0923 \u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341198_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0923 \u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0938\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339898_\u092e\u0939\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339898_\u092e\u0939\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340492_\u0908\u092c\u094d\u0930\u093e\u0939\u093f\u092e \u092a\u0920\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340492_\u0908\u092c\u094d\u0930\u093e\u0939\u093f\u092e \u092a\u0920\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340846_\u0907\u0928\u094d\u0924\u091c\u093e\u0930 \u0916\u093e\u0901": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340846_\u0907\u0928\u094d\u0924\u091c\u093e\u0930 \u0916\u093e\u0901", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342770_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u0913\u092e \u0924\u0941\u0932\u0938\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342770_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u0913\u092e \u0924\u0941\u0932\u0938\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341777_\u0926\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0917\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0909\u092a\u093e\u0927\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341777_\u0926\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0917\u093e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0909\u092a\u093e\u0927\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342791_\u0906\u0928\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342791_\u0906\u0928\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340222_\u091a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0924\u093e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0926\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340222_\u091a\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0924\u093e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0926\u0930\u094d\u091c\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342767_\u092c\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u093f\u0938\u0941\u0928 \u092e\u0941\u0930\u093e\u0909 (\u092e\u094c\u0930\u094d\u092f)": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342767_\u092c\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u093f\u0938\u0941\u0928 \u092e\u0941\u0930\u093e\u0909 (\u092e\u094c\u0930\u094d\u092f)", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340391_\u092c\u0941\u0926\u094d\u0927\u093f\u0938\u093e\u0917\u0930 \u0936\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340391_\u092c\u0941\u0926\u094d\u0927\u093f\u0938\u093e\u0917\u0930 \u0936\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340954_\u0936\u0930\u094d\u0935\u0947\u0938 \u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0947\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340954_\u0936\u0930\u094d\u0935\u0947\u0938 \u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u0921\u0947\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342727_\u0938\u0941\u0917\u094d\u0930\u0940\u092e \u0932\u094b\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342727_\u0938\u0941\u0917\u094d\u0930\u0940\u092e \u0932\u094b\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342704_\u0905\u092c\u094d\u0926\u0941\u0932\u0939\u092e\u0940\u0926 \u0935\u0947\u0917": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342704_\u0905\u092c\u094d\u0926\u0941\u0932\u0939\u092e\u0940\u0926 \u0935\u0947\u0917", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342755_\u092e\u0915\u0938\u0941\u0926 \u092e\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0901": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342755_\u092e\u0915\u0938\u0941\u0926 \u092e\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0901", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342776_\u0928\u0942\u0930\u0941\u0932 \u0915\u092e\u0930 \u0916\u093e\u0901": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342776_\u0928\u0942\u0930\u0941\u0932 \u0915\u092e\u0930 \u0916\u093e\u0901", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342732_\u092c\u093e\u0932\u091c\u0940 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342732_\u092c\u093e\u0932\u091c\u0940 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342394_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0909\u092a\u093e\u0927\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342394_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0909\u092a\u093e\u0927\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342759_\u0925\u0930\u094d\u0915 \u0935\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0916\u0928\u094d\u0917\u093e\u0939\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342759_\u0925\u0930\u094d\u0915 \u0935\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0916\u0928\u094d\u0917\u093e\u0939\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342762_\u092e\u0928\u0940\u0937 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u0928\u094b\u0921\u093f\u092f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342762_\u092e\u0928\u0940\u0937 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u0928\u094b\u0921\u093f\u092f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342781_\u092a\u0902\u0915\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342781_\u092a\u0902\u0915\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342509_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0928\u093f\u0935\u093e\u0938 \u0928\u093e\u090a": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342509_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0928\u093f\u0935\u093e\u0938 \u0928\u093e\u090a", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341474_\u0939\u0930\u093f\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0924\u0947\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341474_\u0939\u0930\u093f\u0930\u093e\u092e \u0924\u0947\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342772_\u0914\u0938\u093e\u092b \u0905\u0939\u092e\u0926 \u0916\u093e\u0901": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342772_\u0914\u0938\u093e\u092b \u0905\u0939\u092e\u0926 \u0916\u093e\u0901", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342347_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u091a\u0924\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0935\u0947\u0926\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342347_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u091a\u0924\u0941\u0930\u094d\u0935\u0947\u0926\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341059_\u092a\u0930\u092e\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u0926\u092f\u093e\u0932 \u092e\u093f\u0936\u094d\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341059_\u092a\u0930\u092e\u0947\u0936\u094d\u200d\u0935\u0930 \u0926\u092f\u093e\u0932 \u092e\u093f\u0936\u094d\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340639_\u0939\u0930\u0940\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340639_\u0939\u0930\u0940\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339417_\u092e\u0939\u093e\u0935\u0940\u0930 \u092a\u0941\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339417_\u092e\u0939\u093e\u0935\u0940\u0930 \u092a\u0941\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340212_\u0935\u093e\u0938\u0941\u0926\u0947\u092c \u0926\u093e\u0939\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340212_\u0935\u093e\u0938\u0941\u0926\u0947\u092c \u0926\u093e\u0939\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339668_\u092e\u093f\u0928\u093e \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932 (\u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e)": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339668_\u092e\u093f\u0928\u093e \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932 (\u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e)", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339754_\u0938\u0940\u0924\u093e \u0926\u0947\u092c\u0940 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339754_\u0938\u0940\u0924\u093e \u0926\u0947\u092c\u0940 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342363_\u0917\u0902\u0917\u093e \u0932\u093e\u0932 \u0930\u093f\u092e\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342363_\u0917\u0902\u0917\u093e \u0932\u093e\u0932 \u0930\u093f\u092e\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340012_\u0938\u093e\u0935\u093f\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340012_\u0938\u093e\u0935\u093f\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340745_\u0927\u094d\u0930\u0941\u0935 \u0930\u093e\u091c \u0935\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340745_\u0927\u094d\u0930\u0941\u0935 \u0930\u093e\u091c \u0935\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340768_\u091c\u0941\u0926\u094d\u0927 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340768_\u091c\u0941\u0926\u094d\u0927 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340883_\u0915\u0941\u0932 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0915\u0947.\u0938\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340883_\u0915\u0941\u0932 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0915\u0947.\u0938\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340995_\u092e\u093e\u0932\u093f\u0915\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340995_\u092e\u093e\u0932\u093f\u0915\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339916_\u092a\u0926\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u200d\u0921\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339916_\u092a\u0926\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092a\u093e\u0923\u094d\u200d\u0921\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340703_\u0927\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340703_\u0927\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339654_\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u0923\u0941 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092d\u0941\u0938\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339654_\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u0923\u0941 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0940 \u092d\u0941\u0938\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339686_\u0915\u0932\u094d\u200d\u092a\u0928\u093e \u0932\u093e\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339686_\u0915\u0932\u094d\u200d\u092a\u0928\u093e \u0932\u093e\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339577_\u092c\u093e\u0932\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339577_\u092c\u093e\u0932\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342354_\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0916\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342354_\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0916\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341202_\u092c\u093f\u0937\u094d\u0923\u0941 \u092c\u093f\u0915\u094d\u0930\u092e \u0938\u0947\u0928 \u0935\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341202_\u092c\u093f\u0937\u094d\u0923\u0941 \u092c\u093f\u0915\u094d\u0930\u092e \u0938\u0947\u0928 \u0935\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341518_\u0938\u092e\u093f\u0930 \u0935\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341518_\u0938\u092e\u093f\u0930 \u0935\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339395_\u092f\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0935\u0938\u094d\u0928\u0947\u0924": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339395_\u092f\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0935\u0938\u094d\u0928\u0947\u0924", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342452_\u0938\u092a\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u0915\u0902\u0921\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342452_\u0938\u092a\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u0915\u0902\u0921\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342147_\u092d\u093e\u0917\u093f\u0930\u093e\u092e \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342147_\u092d\u093e\u0917\u093f\u0930\u093e\u092e \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339968_\u0907\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092c\u0938\u094d\u0928\u0947\u0924": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339968_\u0907\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092c\u0938\u094d\u0928\u0947\u0924", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340473_\u092e\u0939\u0947\u0936 \u0921\u093e\u0901\u0917\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340473_\u092e\u0939\u0947\u0936 \u0921\u093e\u0901\u0917\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341728_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u092e \u0935\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0935\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341728_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u092e \u0935\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0935\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339625_\u092d\u0930\u0924 \u092a\u0930\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339625_\u092d\u0930\u0924 \u092a\u0930\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339708_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339708_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339460_\u0913\u092e\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u0947.\u0938\u0940.": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339460_\u0913\u092e\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u0947.\u0938\u0940.", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339827_\u092d\u0915\u094d\u0924 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0935\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339827_\u092d\u0915\u094d\u0924 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0935\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342769_\u0905\u0938\u094d\u092e\u093f\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342769_\u0905\u0938\u094d\u092e\u093f\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342702_\u092e\u093e\u0928 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0924\u093f\u0930\u0941\u0935\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342702_\u092e\u093e\u0928 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0924\u093f\u0930\u0941\u0935\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339841_\u0932\u094b\u0917 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092c\u094b\u0917\u091f\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339841_\u0932\u094b\u0917 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092c\u094b\u0917\u091f\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342445_\u0939\u093f\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0936\u093e\u0939\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342445_\u0939\u093f\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0936\u093e\u0939\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340984_\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u0920\u093e\u092f\u0924": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340984_\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u0920\u093e\u092f\u0924", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341113_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0916\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341113_\u0915\u0943\u0937\u094d\u0923 \u0916\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340604_\u0930\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u0930\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340604_\u0930\u092e\u0947\u0936 \u092a\u0930\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341154_\u0909\u0926\u0940\u0930\u093e\u092e \u091a\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341154_\u0909\u0926\u0940\u0930\u093e\u092e \u091a\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341420_\u0926\u093f\u0935\u093e\u0915\u0930\u200b \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341420_\u0926\u093f\u0935\u093e\u0915\u0930\u200b \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340273_\u0938\u094c\u092d\u093e\u0917\u094d\u092f \u091c\u0902\u0917 \u0936\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340273_\u0938\u094c\u092d\u093e\u0917\u094d\u092f \u091c\u0902\u0917 \u0936\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340809_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340809_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342654_\u0935\u093f\u092a\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0932\u093e\u092e\u093e \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919\u094d\u0917": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342654_\u0935\u093f\u092a\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0932\u093e\u092e\u093e \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919\u094d\u0917", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342752_\u0938\u0942\u0930\u094d\u092f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0930\u0947\u0917\u094d\u092e\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342752_\u0938\u0942\u0930\u094d\u092f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0930\u0947\u0917\u094d\u092e\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342629_\u092d\u0917\u0935\u0924\u0940 \u0936\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342629_\u092d\u0917\u0935\u0924\u0940 \u0936\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342438_\u092d\u093f\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0938\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342438_\u092d\u093f\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0938\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342236_\u092a\u0926\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0918\u0930\u094d\u0924\u0940 \u092e\u0917\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342236_\u092a\u0926\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0918\u0930\u094d\u0924\u0940 \u092e\u0917\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342374_\u091a\u0947\u0924 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0935\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342374_\u091a\u0947\u0924 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0935\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342249_\u092e\u094b\u0939\u0928 \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342249_\u092e\u094b\u0939\u0928 \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342756_\u0918\u0928\u0936\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092e \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342756_\u0918\u0928\u0936\u094d\u092f\u093e\u092e \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341251_\u0928\u093f\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0932 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341251_\u0928\u093f\u0930\u094d\u092e\u0932 \u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339518_\u0909\u092a\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0936\u093e\u0939\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339518_\u0909\u092a\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0936\u093e\u0939\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342315_\u092d\u093f\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u0901\u0935\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342315_\u092d\u093f\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u0901\u0935\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341978_\u092b\u093e\u0917\u0941 \u0930\u093e\u092e \u0925\u093e\u0930\u0941": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341978_\u092b\u093e\u0917\u0941 \u0930\u093e\u092e \u0925\u093e\u0930\u0941", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341398_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0936\u093e\u0939\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341398_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0936\u093e\u0939\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342070_\u0928\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u0930\u093e\u0935\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342070_\u0928\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u0930\u093e\u0935\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341922_\u0924\u092a\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0936\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341922_\u0924\u092a\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0936\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342552_\u0905\u0930\u0941\u0923 \u0920\u0915\u0941\u0932\u094d\u0932\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342552_\u0905\u0930\u0941\u0923 \u0920\u0915\u0941\u0932\u094d\u0932\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340429_\u0938\u0924\u094d\u092f \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f\u0930\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340429_\u0938\u0924\u094d\u092f \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f\u0930\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340384_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0936 \u092e\u092f\u093e\u0932 \u0935\u093f.\u0915.": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340384_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0936 \u092e\u092f\u093e\u0932 \u0935\u093f.\u0915.", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340353_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0915 \u0930\u093e\u0935\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340353_\u0926\u093f\u092a\u0915 \u0930\u093e\u0935\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339344_\u091b\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f \u0916\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339344_\u091b\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f \u0916\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339301_\u092a\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0930\u0947 \u0932\u093e\u0932 \u0930\u093e\u0928\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339301_\u092a\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0930\u0947 \u0932\u093e\u0932 \u0930\u093e\u0928\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340927_\u0907\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0930\u0940 \u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340927_\u0907\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0930\u0940 \u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340056_\u091c\u092f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u092a\u0928\u094d\u0924": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340056_\u091c\u092f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u092a\u0928\u094d\u0924", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341796_\u0917\u094b\u0930\u0916 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0910\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341796_\u0917\u094b\u0930\u0916 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0910\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339347_\u0924\u093f\u0930\u094d\u0925 \u0930\u093e\u091c \u0909\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0924\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339347_\u0924\u093f\u0930\u094d\u0925 \u0930\u093e\u091c \u0909\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0924\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341182_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0935\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341182_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0935\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341692_\u0930\u0941\u092a\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u092c\u093f\u0937\u094d\u200d\u091f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341692_\u0930\u0941\u092a\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u092c\u093f\u0937\u094d\u200d\u091f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340278_\u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340278_\u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340595_\u0905\u0928\u093f\u0932 \u0930\u093e\u0928\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340595_\u0905\u0928\u093f\u0932 \u0930\u093e\u0928\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341931_\u092e\u0928\u094d\u091c\u0941 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0938\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341931_\u092e\u0928\u094d\u091c\u0941 \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0938\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342246_\u092c\u093f\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0928\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342246_\u092c\u093f\u0930\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0928\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341995_\u0939\u0930\u093f\u0938 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341995_\u0939\u0930\u093f\u0938 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u092d\u091f\u094d\u091f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339369_\u092d\u093e\u0928\u0941 \u092d\u0915\u094d\u0924 \u0935\u094b\u0939\u0930\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339369_\u092d\u093e\u0928\u0941 \u092d\u0915\u094d\u0924 \u0935\u094b\u0939\u0930\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342320_\u0938\u093f\u0926\u094d\u0927\u0930\u093e\u091c \u091c\u094b\u0936\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342320_\u0938\u093f\u0926\u094d\u0927\u0930\u093e\u091c \u091c\u094b\u0936\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341538_\u0939\u0930\u094d\u0915 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0910\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341538_\u0939\u0930\u094d\u0915 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0910\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341967_\u0925\u093e\u0928\u0947\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0930 \u0932\u0947\u0916\u0915": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341967_\u0925\u093e\u0928\u0947\u0936\u094d\u0935\u0930 \u0932\u0947\u0916\u0915", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339464_\u0935\u0940\u0930 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939 \u0915\u094d\u0937\u0947\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339464_\u0935\u0940\u0930 \u0938\u093f\u0902\u0939 \u0915\u094d\u0937\u0947\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339639_\u092d\u093f\u092e\u0938\u0947\u0928 \u0938\u0941\u0924\u092a\u094d\u0930\u093e\u0908 \u092e\u0917\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339639_\u092d\u093f\u092e\u0938\u0947\u0928 \u0938\u0941\u0924\u092a\u094d\u0930\u093e\u0908 \u092e\u0917\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340450_\u091a\u093f\u0930\u0902\u091c\u0940\u0935\u0940 \u0916\u0930\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340450_\u091a\u093f\u0930\u0902\u091c\u0940\u0935\u0940 \u0916\u0930\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340570_\u0939\u094b\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0938\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340570_\u0939\u094b\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0938\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341258_\u0930\u093f\u0924\u092e\u093e\u0928 \u0915\u093e\u092e\u0941 \u092e\u0917\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341258_\u0930\u093f\u0924\u092e\u093e\u0928 \u0915\u093e\u092e\u0941 \u092e\u0917\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340400_\u0913\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940 \u0925\u093e\u0930\u0941": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340400_\u0913\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u091a\u094c\u0927\u0930\u0940 \u0925\u093e\u0930\u0941", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339444_\u092d\u0930\u0924 \u0932\u094b\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339444_\u092d\u0930\u0924 \u0932\u094b\u0928\u093f\u092f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339412_\u0905\u0932\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0938 \u092e\u093f\u092f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339412_\u0905\u0932\u093f\u092f\u093e\u0938 \u092e\u093f\u092f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340786_\u092e\u093f\u0928 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0922\u0915\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340786_\u092e\u093f\u0928 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0922\u0915\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341075_\u0917\u094b\u092a\u093f\u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0939\u0930\u093f\u091c\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341075_\u0917\u094b\u092a\u093f\u091a\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0939\u0930\u093f\u091c\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342077_\u0917\u0902\u0917\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0925\u093e\u0930\u0941 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342077_\u0917\u0902\u0917\u093e \u0926\u0947\u0935\u0940 \u0925\u093e\u0930\u0941 \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094b", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341598_\u0936\u0948\u0932\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0938\u093f\u0901\u0939 \u0938\u0926\u093e\u0938\u0902\u0915\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341598_\u0936\u0948\u0932\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0938\u093f\u0901\u0939 \u0938\u0926\u093e\u0938\u0902\u0915\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341682_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u0947\u0935\u091f": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341682_\u0930\u093e\u092e \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u0947\u0935\u091f", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342076_\u0905\u0936\u094b\u0915 \u0924\u0947\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342076_\u0905\u0936\u094b\u0915 \u0924\u0947\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342224_\u0909\u092e\u093e \u0936\u0902\u0915\u0930 \u0916\u0930\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342224_\u0909\u092e\u093e \u0936\u0902\u0915\u0930 \u0916\u0930\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094d\u0926", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340856_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0939\u0930\u093f\u091c\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340856_\u0939\u0930\u093f \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0939\u0930\u093f\u091c\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341813_\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0923\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0922\u0915\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341813_\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0923\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0922\u0915\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340929_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0939\u0930\u093f\u091c\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340929_\u092e\u0928\u094b\u091c \u0939\u0930\u093f\u091c\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342007_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342007_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341328_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u0924\u0947\u0932\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341328_\u0938\u0941\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u0924\u0947\u0932\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341604_\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u0935\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341604_\u0932\u093e\u0932 \u092c\u0939\u093e\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u0935\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341415_\u0926\u093e\u092e\u094b\u0926\u0930 \u092c\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e \u0938\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341415_\u0926\u093e\u092e\u094b\u0926\u0930 \u092c\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e \u0938\u0941\u0928\u093e\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342384_\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u0923\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342384_\u0935\u093f\u0937\u094d\u0923\u0941 \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092a\u094c\u0921\u0947\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341941_\u0939\u0926\u094d\u0926\u0940\u0938 \u0905\u0932\u093f \u092e\u093f\u092f\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341941_\u0939\u0926\u094d\u0926\u0940\u0938 \u0905\u0932\u093f \u092e\u093f\u092f\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342473_\u0932\u093e\u0915\u094d\u200d\u092a\u093e \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919\u094d\u0917": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342473_\u0932\u093e\u0915\u094d\u200d\u092a\u093e \u0924\u093e\u092e\u093e\u0919\u094d\u0917", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342229_\u091c\u0940\u0924\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0908": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342229_\u091c\u0940\u0924\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u0908", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341926_\u092e\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u094b\u091e\u094d\u091c\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341926_\u092e\u0928 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u094b\u091e\u094d\u091c\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340594_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u092e \u0935\u0930\u094d\u0926\u0947\u0935\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340594_\u092a\u094d\u0930\u0947\u092e \u0935\u0930\u094d\u0926\u0947\u0935\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341374_\u0908\u0936\u094b\u0930 \u0935\u093e\u0917\u094d\u0932\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341374_\u0908\u0936\u094b\u0930 \u0935\u093e\u0917\u094d\u0932\u0947", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339351_\u092f\u093e\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0926\u093e\u0939\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339351_\u092f\u093e\u092e \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u0926\u093e\u0939\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339740_\u092e\u093f\u0932\u0928 \u092d\u0923\u094d\u200d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339740_\u092e\u093f\u0932\u0928 \u092d\u0923\u094d\u200d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341097_\u092a\u0936\u0941\u092a\u0924\u093f \u0918\u093f\u092e\u0940\u0930\u0947": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341097_\u092a\u0936\u0941\u092a\u0924\u093f \u0918\u093f\u092e\u0940\u0930\u0947", "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u0909\u0930\u094d\u091c\u093e\u0936\u0940\u0932 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940, \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932": "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u0909\u0930\u094d\u091c\u093e\u0936\u0940\u0932 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940, \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341079_\u0905\u0928\u093f\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341079_\u0905\u0928\u093f\u0932 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342119_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0928 \u0928\u093f\u0930\u094c\u0932\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342119_\u0930\u093e\u091c\u0928 \u0928\u093f\u0930\u094c\u0932\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341706_\u092c\u0941\u0927\u0941 \u0930\u093f\u0937\u093f\u0926\u0947\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341706_\u092c\u0941\u0927\u0941 \u0930\u093f\u0937\u093f\u0926\u0947\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341437_\u0928\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341437_\u0928\u0930\u0947\u0936 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340756_\u0917\u0923\u0947\u0936 \u092e\u093f\u0936\u094d\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340756_\u0917\u0923\u0947\u0936 \u092e\u093f\u0936\u094d\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341752_\u0924\u0947\u091c \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341752_\u0924\u0947\u091c \u092a\u094d\u0930\u0938\u093e\u0926 \u092d\u0923\u094d\u0921\u093e\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342084_\u092d\u0915\u094d\u0924 \u092e\u0923\u0940 \u0926\u093e\u0939\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342084_\u092d\u0915\u094d\u0924 \u092e\u0923\u0940 \u0926\u093e\u0939\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342319_\u091c\u094d\u091e\u093e\u0928\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0916\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342319_\u091c\u094d\u091e\u093e\u0928\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930 \u0916\u0924\u094d\u0930\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342228_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094b\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_342228_\u0935\u093f\u0928\u094b\u0926 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0915\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339918_\u092e\u094b\u0939\u092e\u0926 \u0930\u0947\u091c\u093e \u0939\u0941\u0938\u0948\u0928": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339918_\u092e\u094b\u0939\u092e\u0926 \u0930\u0947\u091c\u093e \u0939\u0941\u0938\u0948\u0928", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339729_\u0905\u092e\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339729_\u0905\u092e\u0930 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340926_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u091c\u0935\u0902\u0936\u0940": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340926_\u0930\u093e\u091c \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0930\u093e\u091c\u0935\u0902\u0936\u0940", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341853_\u0938\u0941\u091c\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341853_\u0938\u0941\u091c\u093f\u0924 \u0915\u0941\u092e\u093e\u0930 \u0938\u093e\u0939", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341311_\u092e\u092e\u0924\u093e \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341311_\u092e\u092e\u0924\u093e \u092f\u093e\u0926\u0935", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341265_\u0935\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0920": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341265_\u0935\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0936 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0937\u094d\u200d\u0920", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341800_\u0938\u0942\u0930\u094d\u092f \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_341800_\u0938\u0942\u0930\u094d\u092f \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0920\u093e\u0915\u0941\u0930", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340835_\u091c\u092f \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340835_\u091c\u092f \u0928\u093e\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0923 \u0936\u0930\u094d\u092e\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340479_\u0909\u0924\u094d\u0924\u092e \u0926\u093e\u0939\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340479_\u0909\u0924\u094d\u0924\u092e \u0926\u093e\u0939\u093e\u0932", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339578_\u0915\u093f\u0930\u0923 \u0916\u0921\u0915\u093e": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_339578_\u0915\u093f\u0930\u0923 \u0916\u0921\u0915\u093e", "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340517_\u0916\u0921\u093e \u0928\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u0930\u093f\u091c\u093e\u0932": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930_340517_\u0916\u0921\u093e \u0928\u0928\u094d\u0926 \u0930\u093f\u091c\u093e\u0932"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 165, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 165, "registered_not_positive": 165}, "n_stations_flagged": 165, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:08:52.540680", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.502, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.705, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.656, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.505, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.502, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.705, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.151, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.836, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.626, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.656, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.505, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.422, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.742, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.764, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.561, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.813, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.813, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 165}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "05657e38545f4cb5bdf93023ab69e84e", "name": "Nicaragua 2021 presidential (overnight nicaragua_2021_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Nicaragua", "year": 2021, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/RRMaximiliano/eleccionesNic (data/elecciones2021.rda) \u2014 scraped from CSE Flourish visualisation https://flo.uri.sh/visualisation/7664211/embed (embedded CSE per-centro database, cse.gob.ni)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"plc": "plc", "fsln": "fsln", "ccn": "ccn", "aln": "aln", "apre": "apre", "pli": "pli"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3105, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 3105, "registered_not_positive": 3105}, "n_stations_flagged": 3105, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:08:38.629540", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.982, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.209, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.195, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.034, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.245, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.209, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.302, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.49, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.122, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.296, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.074, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.467, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.617, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.321, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.08, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.195, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.195, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.034, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.034, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.101, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.101, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.176, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.176, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.177, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.177, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3105}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "94599e8b5df14357bd8bc6bd1290cd68", "name": "Papua New Guinea 2022 parliamentary (overnight papua_new_guinea_2022_general.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Papua New Guinea", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://pngelections.devpolicy.org/datasets/ (PNG-Election-Database-15-10-25.xlsx, ANU Development Policy Centre)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Adore Papua New Guinea Party": "Adore Papua New Guinea Party", "Advance PNG Party": "Advance PNG Party", "Allegiance Party": "Allegiance Party", "Christian Democratic Party": "Christian Democratic Party", "Future of PNG Party": "Future of PNG Party", "Grassroots United Front Party": "Grassroots United Front Party", "Independent": "Independent", "Indigenous Liberation Party": "Indigenous Liberation Party", "League for National Advancement Party": "League for National Advancement Party", "Liberal Party": "Liberal Party", "Melanesian Alliance Party": "Melanesian Alliance Party", "Melanesian Liberal Party": "Melanesian Liberal Party", "Model Nation Party": "Model Nation Party", "Nation Action Party": "Nation Action Party", "National Alliance": "National Alliance", "New Generation Party": "New Generation Party", "Our Development Party": "Our Development Party", "PNG Country Party": "PNG Country Party", "PNG Destiny Party": "PNG Destiny Party", "PNG Greens Party": "PNG Greens Party", "PNG One Nation Party": "PNG One Nation Party", "PNG Party": "PNG Party", "PNG Youths Party": "PNG Youths Party", "Papua New Guinea First Party": "Papua New Guinea First Party", "Papua New Guinea Liberal Democratic Party": "Papua New Guinea Liberal Democratic Party", "Papua New Guinea National Party": "Papua New Guinea National Party", "Papua New Guinea Prosperity Party": "Papua New Guinea Prosperity Party", "Papua New Guinea Youth Empowerment Party": "Papua New Guinea Youth Empowerment Party", "Papua and Niugini Union Pati": "Papua and Niugini Union Pati", "Paradise Kingdom Party": "Paradise Kingdom Party", "People\u2019s Action Party": "People\u2019s Action Party", "People\u2019s Democratic Movement": "People\u2019s Democratic Movement", "People\u2019s Empowerment Party": "People\u2019s Empowerment Party", "People\u2019s Freedom Party": "People\u2019s Freedom Party", "People\u2019s Labour Party": "People\u2019s Labour Party", "People\u2019s Movement for Change Party": "People\u2019s Movement for Change Party", "People\u2019s National Congress Party": "People\u2019s National Congress Party", "People\u2019s Party": "People\u2019s Party", "People\u2019s Progress Party": "People\u2019s Progress Party", "People\u2019s Reform Party": "People\u2019s Reform Party", "People\u2019s Resources Awareness Party": "People\u2019s Resources Awareness Party", "People\u2019s Transformation Party": "People\u2019s Transformation Party", "Pipol First Party": "Pipol First Party", "Social Democratic Party": "Social Democratic Party", "The Levites Party": "The Levites Party", "The People\u2019s Alliance Party": "The People\u2019s Alliance Party", "Triumph Heritage Empowerment Party": "Triumph Heritage Empowerment Party", "Trust PNG Party": "Trust PNG Party", "United Labour Party": "United Labour Party", "United Party": "United Party", "United Resources Party": "United Resources Party", "Wantok In Godly Services Party": "Wantok In Godly Services Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 118, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 19, "cast_valid_mismatch": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 22, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:08:37.716852", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.398, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.828, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.467, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.369, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.398, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.349, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.828, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.707, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.563, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.431, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.608, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.567, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.729, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.432, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.369, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.369, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.266, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.266, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.813, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.813, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.718, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.718, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 118}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "14bb56638dfa43a79daebd42df5d3985", "name": "Burundi 2025 parliamentary (overnight burundi_2025_legislative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Burundi", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.ceniburundi.bi/resultas-provisoires-pour-lelection-des-desputes-2025", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CNDD_FDD": "CNDD_FDD", "UPRONA": "UPRONA", "CNL": "CNL", "UPD_ZIGAMIBANGA": "UPD_ZIGAMIBANGA", "APDR": "APDR", "FPI": "FPI", "RANAC": "RANAC", "ADR_IMVUGAKURI": "ADR_IMVUGAKURI", "CDP": "CDP", "PMP": "PMP", "FNL": "FNL", "RADEBU": "RADEBU", "PALIPE_AGAKIZA": "PALIPE_AGAKIZA", "SANGWE_PADER": "SANGWE_PADER", "PL": "PL", "AND_INTADOHOKA": "AND_INTADOHOKA", "RADDES": "RADDES", "FPN_IMBONEZA": "FPN_IMBONEZA", "KAZE_FDD": "KAZE_FDD", "FROLINA": "FROLINA", "BURUNDI_BWA_BOSE": "BURUNDI_BWA_BOSE", "IND_MANIRAMBONA_VIANNEY": "IND_MANIRAMBONA_VIANNEY", "IND_NIYONCUNGU_DAVID": "IND_NIYONCUNGU_DAVID", "IND_MINANI_VITAL": "IND_MINANI_VITAL", "IND_NIYONGABO_JULES": "IND_NIYONGABO_JULES", "IND_NSABIYUMVA_CHADRACK": "IND_NSABIYUMVA_CHADRACK", "IND_BUDA_EMMANUEL": "IND_BUDA_EMMANUEL", "IND_NZEYIMANA_THOMAS": "IND_NZEYIMANA_THOMAS", "IND_NAHIMANA_DIEUDONNE": "IND_NAHIMANA_DIEUDONNE", "IND_NIYUNGEKO_CYPRIEN": "IND_NIYUNGEKO_CYPRIEN", "IND_NIYIBIGIRA_ERNEST": "IND_NIYIBIGIRA_ERNEST", "IND_NTATAMASUMO_PASCAL": "IND_NTATAMASUMO_PASCAL"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "province", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 5, "cast_gt_registered": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-08-22T21:05:27.192142", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.599, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.842, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.185, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.06, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.599, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.15, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.842, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.461, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.345, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.368, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.092, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.655, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.664, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.28, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.07, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.185, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.185, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.096, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.096, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.271, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.271, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.164, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.164, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "116c1479a6d146958797d1443a6ad4b8", "name": "Jordan 2024 parliamentary (overnight jordan_2024_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Jordan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Jordanian_general_election", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ajloun__people_of_resolve": "ajloun__people_of_resolve", "ajloun__sons_of_ajloun_mountains": "ajloun__sons_of_ajloun_mountains", "ajloun__union": "ajloun__union", "ajloun__khait_al_laban_ajloun": "ajloun__khait_al_laban_ajloun", "ajloun__loyalty": "ajloun__loyalty", "ajloun__right": "ajloun__right", "ajloun__agreement": "ajloun__agreement", "amman_1__islamic_action_front": "amman_1__islamic_action_front", "amman_1__amman": "amman_1__amman", "amman_1__the_covenant": "amman_1__the_covenant", "amman_1__al_aqsa_mosque": "amman_1__al_aqsa_mosque", "amman_1__to_inspire": "amman_1__to_inspire", "amman_1__union": "amman_1__union", "amman_1__the_future": "amman_1__the_future", "amman_1__right": "amman_1__right", "amman_1__determination": "amman_1__determination", "amman_1__renewal": "amman_1__renewal", "amman_2__islamic_action_front": "amman_2__islamic_action_front", "amman_2__growth": "amman_2__growth", "amman_2__union": "amman_2__union", "amman_2__the_brave_ones": "amman_2__the_brave_ones", "amman_2__right": "amman_2__right", "amman_2__elite": "amman_2__elite", "amman_2__dignity": "amman_2__dignity", "amman_2__unity_wihda": "amman_2__unity_wihda", "amman_2__growth_and_work_alliance": "amman_2__growth_and_work_alliance", "amman_3__the_future": "amman_3__the_future", "amman_3__islamic_action_front": "amman_3__islamic_action_front", "amman_3__packages": "amman_3__packages", "amman_3__the_brave_ones": "amman_3__the_brave_ones", "amman_3__union": "amman_3__union", "amman_3__accord": "amman_3__accord", "amman_3__change": "amman_3__change", "amman_3__the_banner": "amman_3__the_banner", "amman_3__accomplishment": "amman_3__accomplishment", "amman_3__amman_people": "amman_3__amman_people", "amman_3__gaza_hashem": "amman_3__gaza_hashem", "amman_3__message": "amman_3__message", "amman_3__palm_tree": "amman_3__palm_tree", "aqaba__islamic_action_front": "aqaba__islamic_action_front", "aqaba__covenant": "aqaba__covenant", "aqaba__homeland": "aqaba__homeland", "aqaba__jordan_gap": "aqaba__jordan_gap", "aqaba__aqaba": "aqaba__aqaba", "aqaba__accord": "aqaba__accord", "aqaba__sincerity": "aqaba__sincerity", "aqaba__youth_of_the_country": "aqaba__youth_of_the_country", "balqa__covenant": "balqa__covenant", "balqa__justice": "balqa__justice", "balqa__blessing": "balqa__blessing", "balqa__loyalty": "balqa__loyalty", "balqa__list_of_goodness": "balqa__list_of_goodness", "balqa__sons_of_balqa": "balqa__sons_of_balqa", "balqa__islamic_action_front": "balqa__islamic_action_front", "balqa__change": "balqa__change", "balqa__the_sons_of_the_general": "balqa__the_sons_of_the_general", "balqa__peace": "balqa__peace", "balqa__nashmiyat_balqa": "balqa__nashmiyat_balqa", "irbid_1__justice": "irbid_1__justice", "irbid_1__the_audience": "irbid_1__the_audience", "irbid_1__islamic_action_front": "irbid_1__islamic_action_front", "irbid_1__the_covenant": "irbid_1__the_covenant", "irbid_1__the_future": "irbid_1__the_future", "irbid_1__cooperation": "irbid_1__cooperation", "irbid_1__dignity": "irbid_1__dignity", "irbid_1__loyalty": "irbid_1__loyalty", "irbid_1__homeland": "irbid_1__homeland", "irbid_1__the_brave_ones": "irbid_1__the_brave_ones", "irbid_1__the_poor": "irbid_1__the_poor", "irbid_1__accord": "irbid_1__accord", "irbid_2__knights": "irbid_2__knights", "irbid_2__the_people": "irbid_2__the_people", "irbid_2__the_covenant": "irbid_2__the_covenant", "irbid_2__justice": "irbid_2__justice", "irbid_2__loyalty": "irbid_2__loyalty", "irbid_2__progress": "irbid_2__progress", "irbid_2__change": "irbid_2__change", "irbid_2__the_brave_ones": "irbid_2__the_brave_ones", "irbid_2__youth": "irbid_2__youth", "irbid_2__hope_list": "irbid_2__hope_list", "irbid_2__gate_of_ar_rayyan": "irbid_2__gate_of_ar_rayyan", "jerash__people_of_determination": "jerash__people_of_determination", "jerash__jerash": "jerash__jerash", "jerash__the_country_deserves_it": "jerash__the_country_deserves_it", "jerash__jerash_will": "jerash__jerash_will", "jerash__loyalty": "jerash__loyalty", "jerash__the_brave_ones": "jerash__the_brave_ones", "jerash__islamic_action_front": "jerash__islamic_action_front", "jerash__renaissance": "jerash__renaissance", "jerash__message": "jerash__message", "karak__the_light": "karak__the_light", "karak__loyalty": "karak__loyalty", "karak__message": "karak__message", "karak__good": "karak__good", "karak__right_bloc": "karak__right_bloc", "karak__karak": "karak__karak", "karak__victory": "karak__victory", "karak__islamic_action_front": "karak__islamic_action_front", "karak__dawn_of_the_jordan_valley": "karak__dawn_of_the_jordan_valley", "karak__palm_block": "karak__palm_block", "karak__al_mizan": "karak__al_mizan", "karak__the_coffee_pot": "karak__the_coffee_pot", "karak__justice": "karak__justice", "karak__the_job": "karak__the_job", "karak__science_and_knowledge": "karak__science_and_knowledge", "karak__dignity": "karak__dignity", "karak__the_shemagh": "karak__the_shemagh", "ma_an__union": "ma_an__union", "ma_an__right": "ma_an__right", "ma_an__accord": "ma_an__accord", "ma_an__covenant": "ma_an__covenant", "ma_an__al_shoubak": "ma_an__al_shoubak", "ma_an__panic": "ma_an__panic", "madaba__madaba": "madaba__madaba", "madaba__loyalty": "madaba__loyalty", "madaba__covenant": "madaba__covenant", "madaba__thiban": "madaba__thiban", "madaba__dignity": "madaba__dignity", "madaba__national_unity": "madaba__national_unity", "madaba__islamic_action_front": "madaba__islamic_action_front", "madaba__determination": "madaba__determination", "madaba__jerusalem": "madaba__jerusalem", "madaba__al_mizan": "madaba__al_mizan", "mafraq__right_block": "mafraq__right_block", "mafraq__knights_of_mafraq": "mafraq__knights_of_mafraq", "mafraq__mafraq_brings_us_together": "mafraq__mafraq_brings_us_together", "mafraq__the_flag": "mafraq__the_flag", "mafraq__wisdom": "mafraq__wisdom", "mafraq__sons_of_ploughmen": "mafraq__sons_of_ploughmen", "tafilah__we_are_proud_of_the_country": "tafilah__we_are_proud_of_the_country", "tafilah__rain": "tafilah__rain", "tafilah__the_proud_tafilah": "tafilah__the_proud_tafilah", "tafilah__dawn": "tafilah__dawn", "tafilah__union": "tafilah__union", "tafilah__dignity": "tafilah__dignity", "tafilah__the_banner": "tafilah__the_banner", "tafilah__the_promise": "tafilah__the_promise", "tafilah__free_sound": "tafilah__free_sound", "tafilah__certainty": "tafilah__certainty", "tafilah__the_determination": "tafilah__the_determination", "zarqa__dignity": "zarqa__dignity", "zarqa__islamic_action_front": "zarqa__islamic_action_front", "zarqa__determination": "zarqa__determination", "zarqa__agreement": "zarqa__agreement", "zarqa__progress": "zarqa__progress", "zarqa__national_islamic_party": "zarqa__national_islamic_party", "zarqa__union": "zarqa__union", "zarqa__sons_of_the_country": "zarqa__sons_of_the_country", "zarqa__sons_of_zarqa": "zarqa__sons_of_zarqa", "zarqa__workers": "zarqa__workers", "zarqa__national_loyalty": "zarqa__national_loyalty", "bedouins_of_the_north__the_candle": "bedouins_of_the_north__the_candle", "bedouins_of_the_north__thunder_of_the_north": "bedouins_of_the_north__thunder_of_the_north", "bedouins_of_the_north__chivalry": "bedouins_of_the_north__chivalry", "bedouins_of_the_north__loyalty_and_covenant": "bedouins_of_the_north__loyalty_and_covenant", "bedouins_of_the_north__accord": "bedouins_of_the_north__accord", "bedouins_of_the_north__dignity": "bedouins_of_the_north__dignity", "bedouins_of_the_north__badia_union": "bedouins_of_the_north__badia_union", "bedouins_of_the_middle__blessing": "bedouins_of_the_middle__blessing", "bedouins_of_the_middle__determination": "bedouins_of_the_middle__determination", "bedouins_of_the_middle__accord": "bedouins_of_the_middle__accord", "bedouins_of_the_middle__dignity": "bedouins_of_the_middle__dignity", "bedouins_of_the_middle__honesty": "bedouins_of_the_middle__honesty", "bedouins_of_the_middle__the_future": "bedouins_of_the_middle__the_future", "bedouins_of_the_middle__renaissance": "bedouins_of_the_middle__renaissance", "bedouins_of_the_middle__one_body": "bedouins_of_the_middle__one_body", "bedouins_of_the_middle__justice": "bedouins_of_the_middle__justice", "bedouins_of_the_south__the_brave_ones": "bedouins_of_the_south__the_brave_ones", "bedouins_of_the_south__national_charter_party": "bedouins_of_the_south__national_charter_party", "bedouins_of_the_south__loyalty": "bedouins_of_the_south__loyalty", "bedouins_of_the_south__the_future": "bedouins_of_the_south__the_future", "bedouins_of_the_south__list_of_goodness": "bedouins_of_the_south__list_of_goodness"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-13T02:06:08.328662", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.002, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.457, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.274, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.27, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.002, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.457, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.336, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.48, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.662, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.023, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.608, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.402, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.274, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.274, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.27, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.27, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.211, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.211, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.676, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.43, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.43, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.575, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.575, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f661429f93c84d85961ce0eb6d267173", "name": "mongolia_2016_parliamentary.parquet 2016 parliamentary (overnight mongolia_2016_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mongolia", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ikon.mn/uix/result/2016", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u0410\u041d": "\u0410\u041d", "\u0410\u0422\u0425\u041d": "\u0410\u0422\u0425\u041d", "\u0411\u0414\u041d\u0414": "\u0411\u0414\u041d\u0414", "\u0411\u041d\u041d": "\u0411\u041d\u041d", "\u0418\u0417\u041d\u041d": "\u0418\u0417\u041d\u041d", "\u0418\u0425\u041d": "\u0418\u0425\u041d", "\u041c\u0410\u041d": "\u041c\u0410\u041d", "\u041c\u0410\u0425\u041d": "\u041c\u0410\u0425\u041d", "\u041c\u041a\u041d": "\u041c\u041a\u041d", "\u041c\u0421\u0414\u041d": "\u041c\u0421\u0414\u041d", "\u041c\u0423\u041d\u041d": "\u041c\u0423\u041d\u041d", "\u041c\u0430\u0425\u041d": "\u041c\u0430\u0425\u041d", "\u0422\u0422\u042d\u041d\u042d": "\u0422\u0422\u042d\u041d\u042d", "\u0425\u0410\u0410\u041d": "\u0425\u0410\u0410\u041d", "\u042d\u041e\u041d\u042d": "\u042d\u041e\u041d\u042d", "\u042d\u0427\u0425\u041d": "\u042d\u0427\u0425\u041d"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 76, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-13T02:06:07.690224", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 76}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8dedb8ac34674a9e9ad915b3531479af", "name": "Japan 2021 parliamentary (overnight japan_2021_representatives.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.soumu.go.jp/senkyo/senkyo_s/data/shugiin49/index.html", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"LDP": "LDP", "CDP": "CDP", "Ishin": "Ishin", "Komeito": "Komeito", "JCP": "JCP", "DPP": "DPP", "Reiwa": "Reiwa", "SDP": "SDP", "NHKParty": "NHKParty", "SupportNoParty": "SupportNoParty", "JapanFirst": "JapanFirst", "NewPartyYamato": "NewPartyYamato", "CoronaCountermeasures": "CoronaCountermeasures"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 47, "granularity": "region", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-13T02:06:07.429418", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.858, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.926, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.824, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.736, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.147, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.045, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.045, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 47}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9669a30f32764577bebb8aab3d1b9dcb", "name": "South Korea 2020 parliamentary (overnight southkorea_2020_legislative.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "http://data.nec.go.kr/open-data/file.do?dataId=9 (attachFileId=1, sheet \uc9c0\uc5ed\uad6c)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democratic": "votes_democratic", "votes_united_future": "votes_united_future", "votes_nrdp": "votes_nrdp", "votes_independent": "votes_independent", "votes_justice": "votes_justice", "votes_minjung": "votes_minjung", "votes_minsaeng": "votes_minsaeng", "votes_our_republican": "votes_our_republican", "votes_cluup": "votes_cluup", "votes_pro_park": "votes_pro_park", "votes_hannara": "votes_hannara", "votes_labor": "votes_labor", "votes_basic_income": "votes_basic_income", "votes_peace_hr": "votes_peace_hr", "votes_republican": "votes_republican", "votes_peoples_new": "votes_peoples_new", "votes_peoples_dem": "votes_peoples_dem", "votes_future": "votes_future", "votes_welfare": "votes_welfare", "votes_unification_dem": "votes_unification_dem", "votes_saenuri": "votes_saenuri", "votes_chungcheong": "votes_chungcheong"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18813, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 250, "registered_not_positive": 240}, "n_stations_flagged": 250, "created_at": "2026-07-13T02:05:11.841258", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.806, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.85, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.782, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.806, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.718, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.625, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.191, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.048, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.924, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.903, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.113, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.113, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18813}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a23f289ec3a6466fb8109bb3d55e9cb5", "name": "Taiwan 2016 presidential (overnight taiwan_2016_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Taiwan", "year": 2016, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/kiang/db.cec.gov.tw (voteData/2016\u7e3d\u7d71\u7acb\u59d4/\u7e3d\u7d71; mirror of CEC db.cec.gov.tw)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Eric_Chu_KMT": "Eric_Chu_KMT", "Tsai_Ing-wen_DPP": "Tsai_Ing-wen_DPP", "James_Soong_PFP": "James_Soong_PFP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15582, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-13T02:04:26.081888", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.906, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.912, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.835, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.727, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.605, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.348, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.346, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.743, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 15582}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "95d930ff95d24231aa91c14bd8ff7c14", "name": "Guatemala 2023 presidential (overnight guatemala_2023_presidential_r1.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Guatemala", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://primeraeleccion.trep.gt/ext/jsonData_gtm2023/1687736870/1688050101/GTM-pruebas.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Sandra_Torres_UNE": "Sandra_Torres_UNE", "Isaac_Farchi_AZUL": "Isaac_Farchi_AZUL", "Zury_Rios_VALOR_UNIONISTA": "Zury_Rios_VALOR_UNIONISTA", "Edmond_Mulet_CABAL": "Edmond_Mulet_CABAL", "Ricardo_Sagastume_TODOS": "Ricardo_Sagastume_TODOS", "Manuel_Conde_VAMOS": "Manuel_Conde_VAMOS", "Rudio_Lecsan_Merida_PHG": "Rudio_Lecsan_Merida_PHG", "Rafael_Espada_PR": "Rafael_Espada_PR", "Luis_Lam_Padilla_PIN": "Luis_Lam_Padilla_PIN", "Hugo_Pena_ELEFANTE": "Hugo_Pena_ELEFANTE", "Amilcar_Rivera_VICTORIA": "Amilcar_Rivera_VICTORIA", "Bernardo_Arevalo_SEMILLA": "Bernardo_Arevalo_SEMILLA", "Samuel_Morales_FCN_NACION": "Samuel_Morales_FCN_NACION", "Rudy_Guzman_PPN": "Rudy_Guzman_PPN", "Giulio_Talamonti_UR": "Giulio_Talamonti_UR", "Amilcar_Pop_URNG_WINAQ": "Amilcar_Pop_URNG_WINAQ", "Francisco_Arredondo_CREO": "Francisco_Arredondo_CREO", "Giovanni_Reyes_BIEN": "Giovanni_Reyes_BIEN", "Armando_Castillo_VIVA": "Armando_Castillo_VIVA", "Julio_Rivera_Claveria_MI_FAMILIA": "Julio_Rivera_Claveria_MI_FAMILIA", "Alvaro_Trujillo_CAMBIO": "Alvaro_Trujillo_CAMBIO", "Manuel_Villacorta_VOS": "Manuel_Villacorta_VOS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 24585, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 544, "invalid_gt_cast": 50, "cast_gt_registered": 14, "cast_valid_mismatch": 24030}, "n_stations_flagged": 24060, "created_at": "2026-07-13T02:03:01.140744", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.887, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.736, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.506, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.338, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.349, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.37, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.593, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.281, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.32, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.338, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.338, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.228, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.228, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.696, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 24585}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3cab6a0d743e44a4b1cee2648bc43047", "name": "Ecuador 2021 presidential (overnight ecuador_2021_r1_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Ecuador", "year": 2021, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/RickyTB/elecciones-2021/HEAD/src/data/elecciones_res_presidente.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_andres_arauz_galarza": "votes_andres_arauz_galarza", "votes_lucio_gutierrez": "votes_lucio_gutierrez", "votes_gerson_almeida": "votes_gerson_almeida", "votes_isidro_perfecto_romero_carbo": "votes_isidro_perfecto_romero_carbo", "votes_carlos_sagnay_de_la_bastida": "votes_carlos_sagnay_de_la_bastida", "votes_xavier_hervas": "votes_xavier_hervas", "votes_pedro_jose_freile": "votes_pedro_jose_freile", "votes_cesar_montufar": "votes_cesar_montufar", "votes_yaku_perez": "votes_yaku_perez", "votes_giovanny_andrade_salvador": "votes_giovanny_andrade_salvador", "votes_gustavo_larrea_cabrera": "votes_gustavo_larrea_cabrera", "votes_guillermo_lasso_mendoza": "votes_guillermo_lasso_mendoza", "votes_guillermo_celi": "votes_guillermo_celi", "votes_juan_fernando_velasco_torres": "votes_juan_fernando_velasco_torres", "votes_paul_ernesto_carrasco": "votes_paul_ernesto_carrasco", "votes_ximena_pena_pacheco": "votes_ximena_pena_pacheco"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 39983, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 39960, "cast_valid_mismatch": 37784, "registered_not_positive": 39983}, "n_stations_flagged": 39983, "created_at": "2026-07-13T02:01:02.041020", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.353, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.65, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.625, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.454, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.353, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.189, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.547, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.165, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.685, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.454, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.454, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.376, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.376, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.544, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.627, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.627, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 39983}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "30328f62a1a94eb7b8a16876571d5ea2", "name": "Panama 2024 presidential (overnight panama_2024_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Panama", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.datosabiertos.gob.pa/dataset/te-votos-por-candidatos-presidente-2024", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Carrizo_Jaen": "Carrizo_Jaen", "Mulino_Quintero": "Mulino_Quintero", "Roux_Moses": "Roux_Moses", "Lombana": "Lombana", "Torrijos": "Torrijos", "Arrocha": "Arrocha", "Rodriguez_Zulay": "Rodriguez_Zulay", "Gordon_Calderon": "Gordon_Calderon"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 40}, "n_stations_flagged": 40, "created_at": "2026-07-13T02:00:58.377017", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.751, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.945, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.728, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.578, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.751, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.826, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.553, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.24, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.479, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.42, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.578, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.578, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.471, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.471, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.888, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.484, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.484, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 40}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f8ba4273ac8e4830bf514ab76e9b213e", "name": "Paraguay 2023 presidential (overnight paraguay_2023_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Paraguay", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.datos.gov.py/dataset/resultados-de-elecciones-generales-2023-por-mesa (resource: resultados-2023-por-local.xlsx)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Santiago_Pena_ANR": "Santiago_Pena_ANR", "Efrain_Alegre_Concertacion": "Efrain_Alegre_Concertacion", "cand_UNACE": "cand_UNACE", "cand_MPNR": "cand_MPNR", "cand_MHS": "cand_MHS", "cand_PNU": "cand_PNU", "cand_PJFJ": "cand_PJFJ", "cand_PVP": "cand_PVP", "cand_PNG": "cand_PNG", "cand_CPC": "cand_CPC", "cand_PSDH": "cand_PSDH", "cand_UP": "cand_UP", "Paraguayo_Cubas_PCN": "Paraguayo_Cubas_PCN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12259, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 12259, "cast_gt_registered": 12234}, "n_stations_flagged": 12259, "created_at": "2026-07-13T01:59:59.804515", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.933, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.183, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.576, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.42, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.183, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.656, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.414, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.0, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.348, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.337, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.576, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.576, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.42, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.42, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.24, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.24, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.739, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 12259}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ce834a09d0264714b4323da9e8aa175f", "name": "Philippines 2022 presidential \u2014 per-clustered-precinct (105,613; ~98% transmitted, COMELEC transparency server)", "metadata": {"country": "Philippines", "year": 2022, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Ernesto Abella": "Ernesto Abella", "Leody de Guzman": "Leody de Guzman", "Isko Moreno Domagoso": "Isko Moreno Domagoso", "Norberto Gonzales": "Norberto Gonzales", "Panfilo Lacson": "Panfilo Lacson", "Faisal Mangondato": "Faisal Mangondato", "Bongbong Marcos": "Bongbong Marcos", "Jose Montemayor Jr": "Jose Montemayor Jr", "Manny Pacquiao": "Manny Pacquiao", "Leni Robredo": "Leni Robredo"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 105613, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 105613, "registered_not_positive": 105613}, "n_stations_flagged": 105613, "created_at": "2026-07-13T00:49:20.794866", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.172, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.781, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.411, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.277, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.384, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.596, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.058, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.265, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.602, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.558, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.39, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.512, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.411, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.411, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.277, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.277, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.178, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.178, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.657, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.657, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 105613}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "38bf553651de4e99a2c6ec200acd612f", "name": "Japan 2022 parliamentary (overnight japan_2022_hc_prefecture.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.soumu.go.jp/senkyo/senkyo_s/data/sangiin26/index.html (votes main_content/000825832.xls; cast/valid/invalid 000825836.xls; registered 000825821.xls)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"LDP": "LDP", "CDP": "CDP", "Ishin": "Ishin", "Komeito": "Komeito", "DPP": "DPP", "JCP": "JCP", "Reiwa": "Reiwa", "Sanseito": "Sanseito", "SDP": "SDP", "NHKParty": "NHKParty", "Happiness": "Happiness", "GobouParty": "GobouParty", "JapanFirst": "JapanFirst", "Kunimori": "Kunimori", "Shinpu": "Shinpu"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 47, "granularity": "region", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-07-13T00:49:12.611145", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.858, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.926, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.823, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.738, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.147, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.823, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.924, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.045, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.045, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 47}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1752a26426924ce5bcc73bede9ab5c16", "name": "Pakistan 2008 parliamentary (overnight pakistan_2008_na_general.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/colincookman/pakistan_elections", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PPPP": "PPPP", "PMLQ": "PMLQ", "PMLN": "PMLN", "Independent": "Independent", "MQM": "MQM", "JUIF": "JUIF", "ANP": "ANP", "PMLF": "PMLF", "QWP": "QWP", "NP": "NP", "BNPA": "BNPA", "Other": "Other", "PDP": "PDP", "NPP": "NPP", "SUP": "SUP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 268, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-13T00:49:11.692945", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.505, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.593, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.416, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.223, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.505, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.626, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.593, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.489, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.237, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.048, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.472, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.416, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.416, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.223, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.223, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.5, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.5, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 268}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6b2e5b2bc9544434bc690e1b6f484cd9", "name": "India 2019 local (overnight india_andhra_pradesh_2019_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2019, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Andhra_Pradesh/Andhra_Pradesh_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"TDP_ASHOK_BENDALAM": "TDP_ASHOK_BENDALAM", "YSRCP_PIRIYA_SAIRAJ": "YSRCP_PIRIYA_SAIRAJ", "JNP_DASARI_RAJU": "JNP_DASARI_RAJU", "NOTA_NOTA": "NOTA_NOTA", "INC_ESWARA_RAO_KOLLI": "INC_ESWARA_RAO_KOLLI", "BJP_JANNALA_SURYAVARA_PRASADA_RAO": "BJP_JANNALA_SURYAVARA_PRASADA_RAO", "IND_1_GANAPA_VANAJAKSHI": "IND_1_GANAPA_VANAJAKSHI", "YSRCP_APPALARAJU_SEEDIRI": "YSRCP_APPALARAJU_SEEDIRI", "TDP_GOUTHU_SIREESHA": "TDP_GOUTHU_SIREESHA", "JNP_KOTHA_PURNACHANDRA_RAO": "JNP_KOTHA_PURNACHANDRA_RAO", "BJP_KORRAYI_BALAKRISHNA": "BJP_KORRAYI_BALAKRISHNA", "INC_MAJJI_SARADA": "INC_MAJJI_SARADA", "IND_2_DUNNA_VASUDEVU": "IND_2_DUNNA_VASUDEVU", "IND_2_MANOJ_NALANAGULA": "IND_2_MANOJ_NALANAGULA", "CPI_ML_L_KAMESWARA_RAO_POTHANAPALLI": "CPI_ML_L_KAMESWARA_RAO_POTHANAPALLI", "IND_2_MAMIDI_PRASAD": "IND_2_MAMIDI_PRASAD", "TDP_ATCHANNAIDU_KINJARAPU": "TDP_ATCHANNAIDU_KINJARAPU", "YSRCP_PERADA_TILAK": "YSRCP_PERADA_TILAK", "JNP_KANITI_KIRAN_KUMAR": "JNP_KANITI_KIRAN_KUMAR", "INC_CHINTADA_DILEEP_KUMAR": "INC_CHINTADA_DILEEP_KUMAR", "BJP_HANUMANTHU_UDAY_BHASKAR": "BJP_HANUMANTHU_UDAY_BHASKAR", "IND_3_RAMU_GEDDEVALASA": "IND_3_RAMU_GEDDEVALASA", "IND_3_GUTLA_KANCHANA": "IND_3_GUTLA_KANCHANA", "AIFB_CHANDRASEKHARA_PATNAIK": "AIFB_CHANDRASEKHARA_PATNAIK", "YSRCP_REDDY_SHANTHI": "YSRCP_REDDY_SHANTHI", "TDP_KALAMATA_VENKATA_RAMANA_MURTHY": "TDP_KALAMATA_VENKATA_RAMANA_MURTHY", "JNP_GEDELA_GYANA_SAGAR": "JNP_GEDELA_GYANA_SAGAR", "INC_BANNA_RAMU": "INC_BANNA_RAMU", "BJP_RAGHAVA_RAO_SALANA": "BJP_RAGHAVA_RAO_SALANA", "ACP_KANTUBHUKTA_BHASKARA_RAO": "ACP_KANTUBHUKTA_BHASKARA_RAO", "IND_4_MULLETI_SRINIVAS_ACHARI": "IND_4_MULLETI_SRINIVAS_ACHARI", "IND_4_BHASKARARAO_BODDEPALLI": "IND_4_BHASKARARAO_BODDEPALLI", "YSRCP_DHARMANA_PRASADA_RAO": "YSRCP_DHARMANA_PRASADA_RAO", "TDP_GUNDA_LAKSHMI_DEVI": "TDP_GUNDA_LAKSHMI_DEVI", "JNP_KORADA_SARVESWARA_RAO": "JNP_KORADA_SARVESWARA_RAO", "INC_CHOWDARI_SATISH": "INC_CHOWDARI_SATISH", "BJP_CHALLA_VENKATESWARA_RAO": "BJP_CHALLA_VENKATESWARA_RAO", "IND_5_MYLAPILLI_TEJU": "IND_5_MYLAPILLI_TEJU", "JAJGP_RAGOLU_NAGA_SIVA": "JAJGP_RAGOLU_NAGA_SIVA", "PPOI_MAHESH_A": "PPOI_MAHESH_A", "YSRCP_THAMMINENI_SEETHARAM": "YSRCP_THAMMINENI_SEETHARAM", "TDP_KOONA_RAVIKUMAR": "TDP_KOONA_RAVIKUMAR", "JNP_PEDADA_RAMAMOHANA_RAO": "JNP_PEDADA_RAMAMOHANA_RAO", "INC_BODDEPALLI_SATYAVATHI": "INC_BODDEPALLI_SATYAVATHI", "BJP_GADDAYYA_PATINI": "BJP_GADDAYYA_PATINI", "IND_6_SATEESHKUMAR_TULUGU": "IND_6_SATEESHKUMAR_TULUGU", "YSRCP_GORLE_KIRAN_KUMAR": "YSRCP_GORLE_KIRAN_KUMAR", "TDP_KALAVENKATA_RAO_KIMIDI": "TDP_KALAVENKATA_RAO_KIMIDI", "JNP_BADANA_VENKATA_JANARDHANA_RAO": "JNP_BADANA_VENKATA_JANARDHANA_RAO", "INC_KOTTAKOTLA_SIMHADRI_NAIDU": "INC_KOTTAKOTLA_SIMHADRI_NAIDU", "BJP_ROKKAM_SURYAPRAKASH_RAO": "BJP_ROKKAM_SURYAPRAKASH_RAO", "IND_7_MAHANTHI_SATYANARAYANA": "IND_7_MAHANTHI_SATYANARAYANA", "IND_7_MUDILI_VENKATA_RAMANA": "IND_7_MUDILI_VENKATA_RAMANA", "IND_7_ANANTH_MAHANTHI": "IND_7_ANANTH_MAHANTHI", "PPOI_KARI_SIVA_RAO": "PPOI_KARI_SIVA_RAO", "YSRCP_DHARMANA_KRISHNA_DAS": "YSRCP_DHARMANA_KRISHNA_DAS", "TDP_BAGGU_RAMANA_MURTHY": "TDP_BAGGU_RAMANA_MURTHY", "INC_DOLA_UDAYABHASKARA_RAO": "INC_DOLA_UDAYABHASKARA_RAO", "JNP_METTA_VAIKUNTA_RAO": "JNP_METTA_VAIKUNTA_RAO", "BJP_REDDI_BHAGYA_LAKSHMI": "BJP_REDDI_BHAGYA_LAKSHMI", "IND_8_SATYA_TADI": "IND_8_SATYA_TADI", "IND_8_BHERI_VENKATA_RAMANA": "IND_8_BHERI_VENKATA_RAMANA", "JAJGP_DANDUPATI_KOTESHWAR_RAO": "JAJGP_DANDUPATI_KOTESHWAR_RAO", "IND_8_NAIDUGARI_RAJASEKHAR": "IND_8_NAIDUGARI_RAJASEKHAR", "YSRCP_KAMBALA_JOGULU": "YSRCP_KAMBALA_JOGULU", "TDP_KONDRU_MURALI_MOHAN": "TDP_KONDRU_MURALI_MOHAN", "JNP_MUTCHA_SRINIVASA_RAO": "JNP_MUTCHA_SRINIVASA_RAO", "INC_KAMBALA_RAJAVARDHANA": "INC_KAMBALA_RAJAVARDHANA", "BJP_CHAITANYA_KUMAR_MANNENA": "BJP_CHAITANYA_KUMAR_MANNENA", "PRSHP_MANNENA_RAMESH": "PRSHP_MANNENA_RAMESH", "YSRCP_VISWASARAYI_KALAVATHI": "YSRCP_VISWASARAYI_KALAVATHI", "TDP_JAYAKRISHNA_NIMMAKA": "TDP_JAYAKRISHNA_NIMMAKA", "CPI_DVG_SANKARA_RAO": "CPI_DVG_SANKARA_RAO", "BJP_SUNEETHA_THADANGI": "BJP_SUNEETHA_THADANGI", "INC_H_PRASAD_RAO": "INC_H_PRASAD_RAO", "IND_10_ARIKA_KRISHNA_RAO": "IND_10_ARIKA_KRISHNA_RAO", "IND_10_GANGAMMA_SAVARA": "IND_10_GANGAMMA_SAVARA", "YSRCP_PUSHPASREEVANI_PAMULA": "YSRCP_PUSHPASREEVANI_PAMULA", "TDP_VEERA_VARA_THODRAMAL_NARA_SIMHA_PRIYA_THATRAJ": "TDP_VEERA_VARA_THODRAMAL_NARA_SIMHA_PRIYA_THATRAJ", "CPM_AVINASH_KUMAR_KOLAKA": "CPM_AVINASH_KUMAR_KOLAKA", "BJP_NIMMAKA_JAYARAJU": "BJP_NIMMAKA_JAYARAJU", "INC_NIMMAKA_SIMHACHALAM": "INC_NIMMAKA_SIMHACHALAM", "IND_11_NIMMAKA_VASUDEVARAO": "IND_11_NIMMAKA_VASUDEVARAO", "YSRCP_ALAJANGI_JOGARAO": "YSRCP_ALAJANGI_JOGARAO", "TDP_BOBBILI_CHIRANJEEVULU": "TDP_BOBBILI_CHIRANJEEVULU", "JNP_GONGADA_GOWRI_SANKARA_RAO": "JNP_GONGADA_GOWRI_SANKARA_RAO", "INC_RAMUDU_HARIYALA": "INC_RAMUDU_HARIYALA", "BJP_SURAGALA_UMA_MAHESWARA_RAO": "BJP_SURAGALA_UMA_MAHESWARA_RAO", "IND_12_JAYARATNA_KUMAR_SAILA": "IND_12_JAYARATNA_KUMAR_SAILA", "IND_12_HARIYALA_PRAMEELA": "IND_12_HARIYALA_PRAMEELA", "YSRCP_PEEDIKA_RAJANNA_DORA": "YSRCP_PEEDIKA_RAJANNA_DORA", "TDP_R_P_BHANJ_DEO": "TDP_R_P_BHANJ_DEO", "JNP_BONELA_GOVINDAMMA": "JNP_BONELA_GOVINDAMMA", "BJP_KONDAGORRI_UDAY_KUMAR": "BJP_KONDAGORRI_UDAY_KUMAR", "INC_RAYALA_SUNDARA_RAO": "INC_RAYALA_SUNDARA_RAO", "IND_13_LACHAYYA_TELUGU": "IND_13_LACHAYYA_TELUGU", "IND_13_M_PARAMMA": "IND_13_M_PARAMMA", "IND_13_JANNI_SIMHACHALAM": "IND_13_JANNI_SIMHACHALAM", "YSRCP_SAMBANGI_VENKATACHINA_APPALA_NAIDU": "YSRCP_SAMBANGI_VENKATACHINA_APPALA_NAIDU", "TDP_VENKATA_SUJAY_KRISHNA_RANGA_RAO_RAVU": "TDP_VENKATA_SUJAY_KRISHNA_RANGA_RAO_RAVU", "JNP_APPALASWAMY_GIRADA": "JNP_APPALASWAMY_GIRADA", "BJP_DWARAPUREDDI_RAMA_MOHANA_RAO": "BJP_DWARAPUREDDI_RAMA_MOHANA_RAO", "INC_DR_NARAYANA_RAO_VENGALA": "INC_DR_NARAYANA_RAO_VENGALA", "PPOI_AYIKA_GNANESWARA_RAO": "PPOI_AYIKA_GNANESWARA_RAO", "YSRCP_BOTCHA_SATYANARAYANA": "YSRCP_BOTCHA_SATYANARAYANA", "TDP_NAGARJUNA_KIMIDI": "TDP_NAGARJUNA_KIMIDI", "INC_ADINARAYANA_JAMMU": "INC_ADINARAYANA_JAMMU", "JNP_MYLIPILLI_SRINIVASA_RAO": "JNP_MYLIPILLI_SRINIVASA_RAO", "BJP_SHANKAR_LAL_SHARMA_DHANDU": "BJP_SHANKAR_LAL_SHARMA_DHANDU", "IPBP_LANDA_RAJA_BABU": "IPBP_LANDA_RAJA_BABU", "JAJGP_VENKATARAO_DARIMIREDDI": "JAJGP_VENKATARAO_DARIMIREDDI", "PPOI_AMARA_SREEDEVI": "PPOI_AMARA_SREEDEVI", "YSRCP_APPALANARASAYYA_BOTCHA": "YSRCP_APPALANARASAYYA_BOTCHA", "TDP_APPALA_NAIDU_KONDAPALLI": "TDP_APPALA_NAIDU_KONDAPALLI", "JNP_RAJEEV_KUMAR_TALACHUTLA": "JNP_RAJEEV_KUMAR_TALACHUTLA", "BJP_JAGAN_MOHAN_RAO_PEDDINTI": "BJP_JAGAN_MOHAN_RAO_PEDDINTI", "INC_BOBBILI_SRINU": "INC_BOBBILI_SRINU", "IND_16_SREENIVASA_RAO_KOMMINENI": "IND_16_SREENIVASA_RAO_KOMMINENI", "PPOI_VALLURI_GAYATHRI": "PPOI_VALLURI_GAYATHRI", "ACP_KANTUBUKTHA_SUNITHA": "ACP_KANTUBUKTHA_SUNITHA", "JAJGP_GANIVADA_PRASANNAKUMAR": "JAJGP_GANIVADA_PRASANNAKUMAR", "YSRCP_APPALA_NAIDU_BADDUKONDA": "YSRCP_APPALA_NAIDU_BADDUKONDA", "TDP_NARAYANASWAMY_NAIDU_PATHIVADA": "TDP_NARAYANASWAMY_NAIDU_PATHIVADA", "JNP_NAGA_MADHAVI_LOKAM": "JNP_NAGA_MADHAVI_LOKAM", "INC_RAMESH_KUMAR_SARAGADA": "INC_RAMESH_KUMAR_SARAGADA", "BJP_PATHIVADA_RAMANA": "BJP_PATHIVADA_RAMANA", "IND_17_REDDI_SURYANARAYANA": "IND_17_REDDI_SURYANARAYANA", "SAPRP_PALLA_VENU_GOPALARAO": "SAPRP_PALLA_VENU_GOPALARAO", "IND_17_MYTHILI_PRATHYUSHA_BOTLAGUDURI": "IND_17_MYTHILI_PRATHYUSHA_BOTLAGUDURI", "IND_17_BAGGA_APPARAO": "IND_17_BAGGA_APPARAO", "PPOI_SAKINETI_LALITHA_KUMARI": "PPOI_SAKINETI_LALITHA_KUMARI", "JAJGP_CHELIBOINA_DURGARAO": "JAJGP_CHELIBOINA_DURGARAO", "YSRCP_VEERA_BHADRA_SWAMY_KOLAGATLA": "YSRCP_VEERA_BHADRA_SWAMY_KOLAGATLA", "TDP_ADITI_VIJAYALAKSHMI_GAJAPATHI_RAJU_PUSAPATI": "TDP_ADITI_VIJAYALAKSHMI_GAJAPATHI_RAJU_PUSAPATI", "JNP_PALAVALASA_YASASVI": "JNP_PALAVALASA_YASASVI", "BJP_KUSUMANCHI_SUBBA_RAO": "BJP_KUSUMANCHI_SUBBA_RAO", "INC_SATISH_KUMAR_SUNKARI": "INC_SATISH_KUMAR_SUNKARI", "IND_18_BHESETTY_APPARAO_BABJI": "IND_18_BHESETTY_APPARAO_BABJI", "IND_18_APPALARAMU_MANDAPAKA": "IND_18_APPALARAMU_MANDAPAKA", "IPBP_SWARNALATHA_REJETI": "IPBP_SWARNALATHA_REJETI", "JAJGP_ADINARAYANA_CHODI": "JAJGP_ADINARAYANA_CHODI", "YSRCP_KADUBANDI_SRINIVASA_RAO": "YSRCP_KADUBANDI_SRINIVASA_RAO", "TDP_KOLLA_LALITHA_KUMARI": "TDP_KOLLA_LALITHA_KUMARI", "CPI_KAMESWARA_RAO_PALIPUDI": "CPI_KAMESWARA_RAO_PALIPUDI", "BJP_C_P_PRASAD": "BJP_C_P_PRASAD", "INC_BOGI_RAMANA": "INC_BOGI_RAMANA", "IND_19_AITHAMSETTI_SRINIVAS": "IND_19_AITHAMSETTI_SRINIVAS", "JAJGP_GORLE_SURIBABU": "JAJGP_GORLE_SURIBABU", "IND_19_BEVARA_VENKATA_LAKSHMI": "IND_19_BEVARA_VENKATA_LAKSHMI", "PPOI_KALLA_SRINIVASA_RAO": "PPOI_KALLA_SRINIVASA_RAO", "YSRCP_MUTTAMSETTI_SRINIVASARAO_AVANTHI_SRINIVAS": "YSRCP_MUTTAMSETTI_SRINIVASARAO_AVANTHI_SRINIVAS", "TDP_SABBAM_HARI": "TDP_SABBAM_HARI", "JNP_NAGA_SANDEEP_PANCHAKARLA": "JNP_NAGA_SANDEEP_PANCHAKARLA", "BJP_APPARAO_KORADA": "BJP_APPARAO_KORADA", "INC_TEDDU_RAMADASU": "INC_TEDDU_RAMADASU", "SHS_GANDIKOTA_RAJESH": "SHS_GANDIKOTA_RAJESH", "IND_20_BANKA_VENKATA_APPARAO": "IND_20_BANKA_VENKATA_APPARAO", "PPOI_K_ATCHIM_NAIDU": "PPOI_K_ATCHIM_NAIDU", "IND_20_KUNA_BABURAO": "IND_20_KUNA_BABURAO", "JAJGP_D_PRABHA_GOUD": "JAJGP_D_PRABHA_GOUD", "TDP_RAMAKRISHNA_BABU_VELAGAPUDI": "TDP_RAMAKRISHNA_BABU_VELAGAPUDI", "YSRCP_AKKARAMANI_VIJAYA_NIRMALA": "YSRCP_AKKARAMANI_VIJAYA_NIRMALA", "JNP_TATARAO_KONA": "JNP_TATARAO_KONA", "BJP_SUHASINI_KOMARAGIRI": "BJP_SUHASINI_KOMARAGIRI", "INC_VAJJIPARTHI_SRINIVASA_RAO": "INC_VAJJIPARTHI_SRINIVASA_RAO", "SAPRP_VENKATA_SURYA_LALITHA_SRIDEVI_RALLAPALLI": "SAPRP_VENKATA_SURYA_LALITHA_SRIDEVI_RALLAPALLI", "IND_21_SHIVA_RAMAKRISHNA_ANAGANI": "IND_21_SHIVA_RAMAKRISHNA_ANAGANI", "IND_21_MATHE_SURESH": "IND_21_MATHE_SURESH", "MPP_KANTHARAO_BUTHADA": "MPP_KANTHARAO_BUTHADA", "ILP_AP_BODDETI_CHAYA_LAKSHMI": "ILP_AP_BODDETI_CHAYA_LAKSHMI", "IND_21_MAANAV": "IND_21_MAANAV", "IND_21_KONA_CHINNARAO": "IND_21_KONA_CHINNARAO", "IND_21_A_CHANDULAL_JASTI": "IND_21_A_CHANDULAL_JASTI", "IND_21_GAMPALA_SESHARATNAM": "IND_21_GAMPALA_SESHARATNAM", "ACP_SIRRA_ISSAKU": "ACP_SIRRA_ISSAKU", "TDP_GANESH_KUMAR_VASUPALLI": "TDP_GANESH_KUMAR_VASUPALLI", "YSRCP_DRONAMRAJU_SRINIVASA_RAO": "YSRCP_DRONAMRAJU_SRINIVASA_RAO", "JNP_GIRIDHAR_GAMPALA": "JNP_GIRIDHAR_GAMPALA", "BJP_KOPPALA_RAM_KUMAR": "BJP_KOPPALA_RAM_KUMAR", "INC_HYDER_ALI_SINKA": "INC_HYDER_ALI_SINKA", "SAPRP_DAGGULURI_VENKATA_RAMANA": "SAPRP_DAGGULURI_VENKATA_RAMANA", "IND_22_DURGA_PRASAD_GUNTU": "IND_22_DURGA_PRASAD_GUNTU", "JAJGP_KOTHAPALLI_GEETHA": "JAJGP_KOTHAPALLI_GEETHA", "IND_22_D_VENKATESWARA_RAO": "IND_22_D_VENKATESWARA_RAO", "IND_22_J_BIPIN_KUMAR_JAIN": "IND_22_J_BIPIN_KUMAR_JAIN", "IND_22_GOURI_SANKAR_DAS_JOSYULA": "IND_22_GOURI_SANKAR_DAS_JOSYULA", "PPOI_BODDETI_JAYA_VENUGOPAL": "PPOI_BODDETI_JAYA_VENUGOPAL", "IND_22_T_V_S_PRASAD": "IND_22_T_V_S_PRASAD", "IND_22_KASARAPU_SATYANARAYANA": "IND_22_KASARAPU_SATYANARAYANA", "TDP_GANTA_SRINIVASA_RAO": "TDP_GANTA_SRINIVASA_RAO", "YSRCP_KAMMILA_KANNAPARAJU_K_K_RAJU": "YSRCP_KAMMILA_KANNAPARAJU_K_K_RAJU", "JNP_PASUPULETI_USHA_KIRAN": "JNP_PASUPULETI_USHA_KIRAN", "BJP_VISHNU_KUMAR_RAJU_PENMETSA": "BJP_VISHNU_KUMAR_RAJU_PENMETSA", "INC_GOMPA_GOVINDA_RAJU": "INC_GOMPA_GOVINDA_RAJU", "SAPRP_ADI_BABU_KARRI": "SAPRP_ADI_BABU_KARRI", "IND_23_SONDI_KRISHNA": "IND_23_SONDI_KRISHNA", "DABAP_BANNA_RAMESH": "DABAP_BANNA_RAMESH", "MPP_NAKKA_NAMMI_GRACE": "MPP_NAKKA_NAMMI_GRACE", "IND_23_SREENU_SEERAPU": "IND_23_SREENU_SEERAPU", "IND_23_VADDI_HARI_GANESH": "IND_23_VADDI_HARI_GANESH", "IND_23_BORRA_RAMESH": "IND_23_BORRA_RAMESH", "IND_23_VINOD_KUMAR_SINGURU": "IND_23_VINOD_KUMAR_SINGURU", "PPOI_SRINIVAS_ADITYA_D": "PPOI_SRINIVAS_ADITYA_D", "YSRPP_GRANDHA_SATHEESH_KUMAR": "YSRPP_GRANDHA_SATHEESH_KUMAR", "IND_23_APPALARAJU_NAMMI": "IND_23_APPALARAJU_NAMMI", "TDP_P_G_V_R_NAIDU_GANA_BABU": "TDP_P_G_V_R_NAIDU_GANA_BABU", "YSRCP_VIJAY_PRASAD_MALLA": "YSRCP_VIJAY_PRASAD_MALLA", "CPI_JAMISETTI_VENKATA_SATYANARAYANA_MURTHY": "CPI_JAMISETTI_VENKATA_SATYANARAYANA_MURTHY", "BJP_BUDDA_CHANDRA_SEKHAR": "BJP_BUDDA_CHANDRA_SEKHAR", "IND_24_P_R_N_VINOD_KUMAR": "IND_24_P_R_N_VINOD_KUMAR", "INC_BHAGAT_PIRIDI": "INC_BHAGAT_PIRIDI", "IND_24_SIGILIPALLI_PAPARAO": "IND_24_SIGILIPALLI_PAPARAO", "IPBP_YENNETI_RAMU": "IPBP_YENNETI_RAMU", "MCPI_KOTA_SURYA_SANKARA_RAO": "MCPI_KOTA_SURYA_SANKARA_RAO", "IND_24_PEDIREDLA_NANAJI": "IND_24_PEDIREDLA_NANAJI", "RPI_PEYYALA_VEERA_VENKATA_SATYANARAYANA_MURTHY": "RPI_PEYYALA_VEERA_VENKATA_SATYANARAYANA_MURTHY", "IND_24_MAMIDI_RAMAKRISHNA": "IND_24_MAMIDI_RAMAKRISHNA", "YSRCP_NAGIREDDY_TIPPALA": "YSRCP_NAGIREDDY_TIPPALA", "JNP_PAWAN_KALYAN_KONIDALA": "JNP_PAWAN_KALYAN_KONIDALA", "TDP_PALLA_SRINIVASA_RAO": "TDP_PALLA_SRINIVASA_RAO", "BJP_PULUSU_JANARDHANA_RAO": "BJP_PULUSU_JANARDHANA_RAO", "INC_GOLLAKOTA_VENKATA_SUBBA_RAO": "INC_GOLLAKOTA_VENKATA_SUBBA_RAO", "SAPRP_KOSURI_JANARDHANA_RAO": "SAPRP_KOSURI_JANARDHANA_RAO", "IND_25_SATISH_D_V": "IND_25_SATISH_D_V", "JAJGP_PARAVADA_ESWARA_RAO": "JAJGP_PARAVADA_ESWARA_RAO", "RPI_A_T_APPALA_SWAMY": "RPI_A_T_APPALA_SWAMY", "IND_25_GATTIM_JYOTHYSWAR_RAO": "IND_25_GATTIM_JYOTHYSWAR_RAO", "PPOI_KEERANMAYI_B": "PPOI_KEERANMAYI_B", "MPP_PAVANI_PANTAGOLUSULA": "MPP_PAVANI_PANTAGOLUSULA", "YSRCP_KARANAM_DHARMASRI": "YSRCP_KARANAM_DHARMASRI", "TDP_KALIDINDI_SURYA_NAGA_SANYASI_RAJU": "TDP_KALIDINDI_SURYA_NAGA_SANYASI_RAJU", "JNP_P_V_S_N_RAJU": "JNP_P_V_S_N_RAJU", "INC_GUNURU_VENKATA_RAO": "INC_GUNURU_VENKATA_RAO", "IND_26_VENKATA_APPALARAJU_GANAPATHIRAJU": "IND_26_VENKATA_APPALARAJU_GANAPATHIRAJU", "BJP_MOLLI_VENKATA_RAMANA": "BJP_MOLLI_VENKATA_RAMANA", "IPBP_PADAVALA_CHAKRAVARTHY": "IPBP_PADAVALA_CHAKRAVARTHY", "IND_26_RAMACHANDRA_RAO_VANKAYALA": "IND_26_RAMACHANDRA_RAO_VANKAYALA", "JAJGP_GOLUKONDA_SRINIVASARAO": "JAJGP_GOLUKONDA_SRINIVASARAO", "YSRCP_BUDI_MUTYALA_NAIDU": "YSRCP_BUDI_MUTYALA_NAIDU", "TDP_GAVIREDDI_RAMANAIDU": "TDP_GAVIREDDI_RAMANAIDU", "JNP_SANYASINAIDU_GAVIREDDY": "JNP_SANYASINAIDU_GAVIREDDY", "INC_BODDU_SRINIVASA": "INC_BODDU_SRINIVASA", "IND_27_MATALA_ARI_NAIDU": "IND_27_MATALA_ARI_NAIDU", "BJP_MANDALA_SANTHOSHI_SUBHA_LAKSHMI": "BJP_MANDALA_SANTHOSHI_SUBHA_LAKSHMI", "IND_27_ALLU_BHANUMATHI": "IND_27_ALLU_BHANUMATHI", "IND_27_CHALLA_YERRU_NAIDU": "IND_27_CHALLA_YERRU_NAIDU", "PP_BARLA_KRISHNA": "PP_BARLA_KRISHNA", "PPOI_TADI_VEERA_JAGADEESWARI": "PPOI_TADI_VEERA_JAGADEESWARI", "JAJGP_BANDARU_VENKATARAMANA": "JAJGP_BANDARU_VENKATARAMANA", "YSRCP_CHETTI_PALGUNA": "YSRCP_CHETTI_PALGUNA", "IND_28_DONNU_DORA_SIYYARI": "IND_28_DONNU_DORA_SIYYARI", "TDP_KIDARI_SRAVAN_KUMAR": "TDP_KIDARI_SRAVAN_KUMAR", "IND_28_P_RAJA_RAO": "IND_28_P_RAJA_RAO", "CPM_SURENDRA_KILLO": "CPM_SURENDRA_KILLO", "IND_28_SURYA_NARAYANA_JARSINGI": "IND_28_SURYA_NARAYANA_JARSINGI", "BJP_ADAPA_BONJU_NAIDU": "BJP_ADAPA_BONJU_NAIDU", "IND_28_VENGADA_ANIL_KUMAR_MAJJI": "IND_28_VENGADA_ANIL_KUMAR_MAJJI", "INC_PACHIPENTA_SANTHA_KUMARI": "INC_PACHIPENTA_SANTHA_KUMARI", "PRSHP_RAJENDRA_PRASAD_BUKKA": "PRSHP_RAJENDRA_PRASAD_BUKKA", "JAJGP_DEVIKA_PADI": "JAJGP_DEVIKA_PADI", "YSRCP_BHAGYA_LAKSHMI_KOTTAGULLI": "YSRCP_BHAGYA_LAKSHMI_KOTTAGULLI", "TDP_ESWARI_GIDDI": "TDP_ESWARI_GIDDI", "IND_29_KUDA_KRISHNARAO": "IND_29_KUDA_KRISHNARAO", "JNP_BALARAJU_PASUPULETI": "JNP_BALARAJU_PASUPULETI", "INC_VANTHALA_SUBBARAO": "INC_VANTHALA_SUBBARAO", "BJP_GANDHI_LOKULA": "BJP_GANDHI_LOKULA", "IND_29_BOINA_SATYANARAYANA": "IND_29_BOINA_SATYANARAYANA", "IND_29_MUDILI_LAKSHMAYYA": "IND_29_MUDILI_LAKSHMAYYA", "IND_29_DONDA_LAKSHMI_VENKATA_RAM_PRASAD": "IND_29_DONDA_LAKSHMI_VENKATA_RAM_PRASAD", "IND_29_BUSARI_KRISHNA_KUMARI": "IND_29_BUSARI_KRISHNA_KUMARI", "IND_29_DADIYA_SATYANARAYANA": "IND_29_DADIYA_SATYANARAYANA", "JAJGP_GADUGU_BALAYYA_DORA": "JAJGP_GADUGU_BALAYYA_DORA", "IND_29_KANNA_BABU_KOKKULA": "IND_29_KANNA_BABU_KOKKULA", "IPBP_JOSEPH_KINTUKURI": "IPBP_JOSEPH_KINTUKURI", "YSRCP_AMARNATH_GUDIVADA": "YSRCP_AMARNATH_GUDIVADA", "TDP_PEELA_GOVINDA_SATYANARAYANA": "TDP_PEELA_GOVINDA_SATYANARAYANA", "JNP_PARUCHURI_BHASKARA_RAO": "JNP_PARUCHURI_BHASKARA_RAO", "BJP_APPARAO_PONNAGANTI": "BJP_APPARAO_PONNAGANTI", "INC_I_R_GANGADHAR": "INC_I_R_GANGADHAR", "IND_30_KONATHALA_SEETARAM": "IND_30_KONATHALA_SEETARAM", "RPI_KH_DOMMESI_APPARAO": "RPI_KH_DOMMESI_APPARAO", "IND_30_VENKATESH": "IND_30_VENKATESH", "IND_30_TAKASI_SURYA_PDHMA": "IND_30_TAKASI_SURYA_PDHMA", "IND_30_PENTAKOTA_RAMARAO": "IND_30_PENTAKOTA_RAMARAO", "PPOI_LAKSHMI_CH_S_N_V": "PPOI_LAKSHMI_CH_S_N_V", "JAJGP_N_NAGESWARA_RAO": "JAJGP_N_NAGESWARA_RAO", "YSRCP_ANNAMREDDY_ADEEP_RAJ": "YSRCP_ANNAMREDDY_ADEEP_RAJ", "TDP_BANDARU_SATYANARAYANA_MURTHY": "TDP_BANDARU_SATYANARAYANA_MURTHY", "JNP_CHINTALAPUDI_VENKATA_RAMAIAH": "JNP_CHINTALAPUDI_VENKATA_RAMAIAH", "BJP_DR_KASAPU_V_V_V_SATYANARAYANA": "BJP_DR_KASAPU_V_V_V_SATYANARAYANA", "INC_ADARI_RAMESH": "INC_ADARI_RAMESH", "IND_31_TATIPUDI_SREERAMULU": "IND_31_TATIPUDI_SREERAMULU", "IND_31_MOLLETI_ESWARA_RAO": "IND_31_MOLLETI_ESWARA_RAO", "IND_31_SK_SAFI_VULLA": "IND_31_SK_SAFI_VULLA", "JAJGP_DITTAKAVI_SWATHI": "JAJGP_DITTAKAVI_SWATHI", "PPOI_NAGESHWARA_RAO_PEELA": "PPOI_NAGESHWARA_RAO_PEELA", "IND_31_KUCHU_APPARAO": "IND_31_KUCHU_APPARAO", "YSRCP_UPPALAPATI_VENKATA_RAMANAMURTHY_RAJU": "YSRCP_UPPALAPATI_VENKATA_RAMANAMURTHY_RAJU", "TDP_PANCHAKARLA_RAMESH_BABU": "TDP_PANCHAKARLA_RAMESH_BABU", "JNP_SUNDARAPU_VIJAY_KUMAR": "JNP_SUNDARAPU_VIJAY_KUMAR", "INC_APPARAO_KUNDRAPU": "INC_APPARAO_KUNDRAPU", "BJP_MYLAPALLI_RAJARAO": "BJP_MYLAPALLI_RAJARAO", "IND_32_VEERA_BALAJI_SATYA_PRASAD_VEESAM": "IND_32_VEERA_BALAJI_SATYA_PRASAD_VEESAM", "SHS_KOLAGANI_NAGESWARARAO": "SHS_KOLAGANI_NAGESWARARAO", "IND_32_RAVI_DEMULLU": "IND_32_RAVI_DEMULLU", "IND_32_PRAGADA_ANNAPURNA": "IND_32_PRAGADA_ANNAPURNA", "IND_32_BOJA_NAGESWARA_RAO": "IND_32_BOJA_NAGESWARA_RAO", "IND_32_ESWARAPU_ASHOK": "IND_32_ESWARAPU_ASHOK", "RPI_LAMBA_SRINIVASARAO": "RPI_LAMBA_SRINIVASARAO", "YSRCP_GOLLA_BABURAO": "YSRCP_GOLLA_BABURAO", "TDP_B_BANGARAIAH": "TDP_B_BANGARAIAH", "JNP_NAKKA_RAJA_BABU": "JNP_NAKKA_RAJA_BABU", "BJP_KAKARA_NOOKA_RAJU": "BJP_KAKARA_NOOKA_RAJU", "INC_TALLURI_VIJAY_KUMAR": "INC_TALLURI_VIJAY_KUMAR", "DABAP_VADLAMURI_KRISHNA_SWAROOP": "DABAP_VADLAMURI_KRISHNA_SWAROOP", "IND_33_SURIBABU_JAKKALA": "IND_33_SURIBABU_JAKKALA", "IND_33_TALUPULU_CHEVVETI": "IND_33_TALUPULU_CHEVVETI", "JAJGP_MORTHA_SIMHACHALAM": "JAJGP_MORTHA_SIMHACHALAM", "YSRCP_UMA_SANKARA_GANESH_PETLA": "YSRCP_UMA_SANKARA_GANESH_PETLA", "TDP_AYYANNA_PATRUDU_CHINTAKAYALA": "TDP_AYYANNA_PATRUDU_CHINTAKAYALA", "BJP_GADE_SRINIVASARAO": "BJP_GADE_SRINIVASARAO", "INC_MEESALA_SUBBANNA": "INC_MEESALA_SUBBANNA", "IND_34_R_V_SURYA_CHANDRA": "IND_34_R_V_SURYA_CHANDRA", "IND_34_TAVVA_CHIRANJEEVI_RAO": "IND_34_TAVVA_CHIRANJEEVI_RAO", "JAJGP_BAYYAPUREDDY_SURESH": "JAJGP_BAYYAPUREDDY_SURESH", "IND_34_APPALANAIDU_ALLU": "IND_34_APPALANAIDU_ALLU", "YSRCP_DADISETTI_RAJA": "YSRCP_DADISETTI_RAJA", "TDP_YANAMALA_KRISHNUDU": "TDP_YANAMALA_KRISHNUDU", "JNP_VENKATA_KRISHNAMRAJU_SRI_RAJA_VATSAVAYI_ASHOKBABU": "JNP_VENKATA_KRISHNAMRAJU_SRI_RAJA_VATSAVAYI_ASHOKBABU", "BJP_ESWARARAO_VELAGA": "BJP_ESWARARAO_VELAGA", "INC_DOCTOR_PANDURANGARAO": "INC_DOCTOR_PANDURANGARAO", "MPP_APPANNA_GEDDAM": "MPP_APPANNA_GEDDAM", "CPI_ML_L_KUTTUMU_JANARDHAN": "CPI_ML_L_KUTTUMU_JANARDHAN", "DABAP_SAKA_RADHAKRISHNA": "DABAP_SAKA_RADHAKRISHNA", "IND_35_YADALA_RAMAKRISHNA": "IND_35_YADALA_RAMAKRISHNA", "PRSHP_UDAYA_BHASKARARAO_MADIKI": "PRSHP_UDAYA_BHASKARARAO_MADIKI", "IPBP_MUNASA_SATHIBABU": "IPBP_MUNASA_SATHIBABU", "IND_35_ANKAREDDI_RAJASESHU": "IND_35_ANKAREDDI_RAJASESHU", "RPI_KH_KRISHNAVENI_BURA": "RPI_KH_KRISHNAVENI_BURA", "JAJGP_TAMARANA_APPARAO": "JAJGP_TAMARANA_APPARAO", "PPOI_ASAPU_VENKATA_NAGA_SURYA_SATYA_PRASAD": "PPOI_ASAPU_VENKATA_NAGA_SURYA_SATYA_PRASAD", "YSRCP_SRI_PURNACHANDRA_PRASAD_PARVATHA": "YSRCP_SRI_PURNACHANDRA_PRASAD_PARVATHA", "TDP_VARUPULA_RAJA": "TDP_VARUPULA_RAJA", "JNP_VARUPULA_TAMMAYYABABU": "JNP_VARUPULA_TAMMAYYABABU", "INC_UMMIDI_VENKATRAO": "INC_UMMIDI_VENKATRAO", "BJP_CHILUKURI_RAM_KUMAR": "BJP_CHILUKURI_RAM_KUMAR", "CPI_ML_L_MANUKONDA_LATCHABABU": "CPI_ML_L_MANUKONDA_LATCHABABU", "MPP_DADISETTY_VEERABABU": "MPP_DADISETTY_VEERABABU", "IND_36_B_V_V_SATYANARAYANA_GORLA": "IND_36_B_V_V_SATYANARAYANA_GORLA", "PRSHP_PARVATHA_PRASAD": "PRSHP_PARVATHA_PRASAD", "YSRCP_DORABABU_PENDEM": "YSRCP_DORABABU_PENDEM", "TDP_S_V_S_N_VARMA": "TDP_S_V_S_N_VARMA", "JNP_MAKINEEDI_SESHU_KUMARI": "JNP_MAKINEEDI_SESHU_KUMARI", "INC_MEDIDI_VENKATA_SRINIVASA_RAO": "INC_MEDIDI_VENKATA_SRINIVASA_RAO", "BJP_BILLAKURTHI_RAMESWARA_REDDY": "BJP_BILLAKURTHI_RAMESWARA_REDDY", "IND_37_VENKATADRI_SURATHU_VENKATADRI_BARATEEYUDU": "IND_37_VENKATADRI_SURATHU_VENKATADRI_BARATEEYUDU", "CPI_ML_L_PILLA_CHANDRAM": "CPI_ML_L_PILLA_CHANDRAM", "JAJGP_RAPARTHI_VENKATA_RAMANA": "JAJGP_RAPARTHI_VENKATA_RAMANA", "PPOI_MADDURI_VEERABABU": "PPOI_MADDURI_VEERABABU", "IND_37_EETI_JAGADEESH": "IND_37_EETI_JAGADEESH", "YSRCP_KURASALA_KANNABABU": "YSRCP_KURASALA_KANNABABU", "TDP_ANANTHLAKSHMI_PILLI": "TDP_ANANTHLAKSHMI_PILLI", "JNP_PANTAM_VENKATESWARA_RAO_NANAJI": "JNP_PANTAM_VENKATESWARA_RAO_NANAJI", "INC_NURUKURTHI_VENKATESWARA_RAO": "INC_NURUKURTHI_VENKATESWARA_RAO", "BJP_KAVIKONDALA_BHIMA_SEKHAR": "BJP_KAVIKONDALA_BHIMA_SEKHAR", "IND_38_MURALASETTY_SUNIL_KUMAR": "IND_38_MURALASETTY_SUNIL_KUMAR", "MPP_JAGGARAPU_MALLIKHARJUNA": "MPP_JAGGARAPU_MALLIKHARJUNA", "PRSHP_SIRANGU_BHUDEVI": "PRSHP_SIRANGU_BHUDEVI", "IND_38_MUDUKI_PEDDIRAJU": "IND_38_MUDUKI_PEDDIRAJU", "PPOI_BONDA_VEKATA_RAMANA": "PPOI_BONDA_VEKATA_RAMANA", "AINPP_YENUGUPALLI_KRISHNA": "AINPP_YENUGUPALLI_KRISHNA", "IND_38_MARELLA_SATYANARAYANA": "IND_38_MARELLA_SATYANARAYANA", "JAJGP_KONKI_RAVITEJA": "JAJGP_KONKI_RAVITEJA", "IND_38_CHAGANTI_SURYANARYANA_MURTY": "IND_38_CHAGANTI_SURYANARYANA_MURTY", "IND_38_PEYYALA_DURGA_PRASAD": "IND_38_PEYYALA_DURGA_PRASAD", "TDP_NIMMAKAYALA_CHINA_RAJAPPA": "TDP_NIMMAKAYALA_CHINA_RAJAPPA", "YSRCP_THOTA_SARASWATHI_ANE_VANI": "YSRCP_THOTA_SARASWATHI_ANE_VANI", "JNP_TUMMALA_RAMASWAMY_BABU": "JNP_TUMMALA_RAMASWAMY_BABU", "INC_DORA_BABU_TUMMALA": "INC_DORA_BABU_TUMMALA", "BJP_YARLAGADDA_RAMKUMAR": "BJP_YARLAGADDA_RAMKUMAR", "JBNP_GORAKAPUDI_CHINNAYYA_DORA": "JBNP_GORAKAPUDI_CHINNAYYA_DORA", "JAJGP_K_RAMANAMMA": "JAJGP_K_RAMANAMMA", "MPP_DIVILI_SATISH": "MPP_DIVILI_SATISH", "IND_39_JOKA_VIJAY_KUMAR": "IND_39_JOKA_VIJAY_KUMAR", "PPOI_AMMANNA_VETUKURI": "PPOI_AMMANNA_VETUKURI", "YSRCP_DOCTOR_SATHI_SURYANARAYANA_REDDY": "YSRCP_DOCTOR_SATHI_SURYANARAYANA_REDDY", "TDP_NALLAMILLI_RAMAKRISHNA_REDDY": "TDP_NALLAMILLI_RAMAKRISHNA_REDDY", "JNP_RELANGI_NAGESWARA_RAO": "JNP_RELANGI_NAGESWARA_RAO", "INC_DR_II_Y_A_VADAYAR": "INC_DR_II_Y_A_VADAYAR", "BJP_MEDAPATI_HARINARAYANAREDDY": "BJP_MEDAPATI_HARINARAYANAREDDY", "JAJGP_AMARAVATHI_PUTHINEEDI": "JAJGP_AMARAVATHI_PUTHINEEDI", "PPOI_NARAYANAMMA_BATHINA": "PPOI_NARAYANAMMA_BATHINA", "IND_40_SATHI_DEVADANA_REDDY": "IND_40_SATHI_DEVADANA_REDDY", "IND_40_CHELLE_SRINU": "IND_40_CHELLE_SRINU", "IND_40_CHELLE_VEERRAJU": "IND_40_CHELLE_VEERRAJU", "IND_40_PADALA_KRISHNAREDDY": "IND_40_PADALA_KRISHNAREDDY", "YSRCP_DWARAMPUDI_CHANDRA_SEKHARA_REDDY": "YSRCP_DWARAMPUDI_CHANDRA_SEKHARA_REDDY", "TDP_VANAMADI_VENKATESWARA_RAO_KONDABABU": "TDP_VANAMADI_VENKATESWARA_RAO_KONDABABU", "JNP_MOOTHA_SASIDHER": "JNP_MOOTHA_SASIDHER", "INC_KOLA_VENKATA_VARAPRASAD_VARMA": "INC_KOLA_VENKATA_VARAPRASAD_VARMA", "BJP_PEDDIREDDI_RAVI_KIRAN": "BJP_PEDDIREDDI_RAVI_KIRAN", "AINPP_INAKOTI_KUMAR_RAMJEE": "AINPP_INAKOTI_KUMAR_RAMJEE", "IND_41_VADREVU_SATISH_KUMAR": "IND_41_VADREVU_SATISH_KUMAR", "PPOI_SOMAGANAPATHI": "PPOI_SOMAGANAPATHI", "IND_41_MUSLEY_HADDIN_SHIRAJI_MAHAMAD": "IND_41_MUSLEY_HADDIN_SHIRAJI_MAHAMAD", "MPP_VEERA_GANESH_SUDHA": "MPP_VEERA_GANESH_SUDHA", "IND_41_B_N_RAO": "IND_41_B_N_RAO", "IND_41_M_G_RAO": "IND_41_M_G_RAO", "IND_41_MADIKI_PRABHAKARA_RAO": "IND_41_MADIKI_PRABHAKARA_RAO", "IND_41_THATIKONDA_VIJAYAKUMAR": "IND_41_THATIKONDA_VIJAYAKUMAR", "IND_41_D_CHANDRA_SEKHAR_RAO": "IND_41_D_CHANDRA_SEKHAR_RAO", "YSRCP_CHELLUBOYINA_SRINIVASA_VENUGOPALAKRISHNA": "YSRCP_CHELLUBOYINA_SRINIVASA_VENUGOPALAKRISHNA", "TDP_THOTA_TRIMURTHULU": "TDP_THOTA_TRIMURTHULU", "JNP_POLISETTI_CHANDRA_SEKHAR": "JNP_POLISETTI_CHANDRA_SEKHAR", "INC_ISUKAPATLA_SATHISH_KUMAR": "INC_ISUKAPATLA_SATHISH_KUMAR", "BJP_DUDALA_SANKARANARAYANAMURTHY": "BJP_DUDALA_SANKARANARAYANAMURTHY", "IND_42_CHANDRASEKHAR_MADIKI": "IND_42_CHANDRASEKHAR_MADIKI", "IND_42_YARRAMSETTI_RAMARAJU": "IND_42_YARRAMSETTI_RAMARAJU", "IND_42_BABUJI_SRI_GUTHULA_JHAI_SRI_SURYENDRANAD": "IND_42_BABUJI_SRI_GUTHULA_JHAI_SRI_SURYENDRANAD", "PRSHP_PUVVALA_LAKSHMI": "PRSHP_PUVVALA_LAKSHMI", "JAJGP_KADA_VEERA_VENKATA_RAMANA": "JAJGP_KADA_VEERA_VENKATA_RAMANA", "IND_42_BOMMOTHULA_VENKATASRINIVASARAO": "IND_42_BOMMOTHULA_VENKATASRINIVASARAO", "IND_42_TRIMURTULU_BANDI": "IND_42_TRIMURTULU_BANDI", "PPOI_PICHIKA_HEMAMBARADHARARAO": "PPOI_PICHIKA_HEMAMBARADHARARAO", "YSRCP_PONNADA_VENKATA_SATISH_KUMAR": "YSRCP_PONNADA_VENKATA_SATISH_KUMAR", "TDP_DATLA_SUBBA_RAJU_BUTCHI_BABU": "TDP_DATLA_SUBBA_RAJU_BUTCHI_BABU", "JNP_PITHANI_BALA_KRISHNA": "JNP_PITHANI_BALA_KRISHNA", "INC_MOPURI_SRINIVAS_KIRAN": "INC_MOPURI_SRINIVAS_KIRAN", "BJP_CHITTI_BABU_KARRI": "BJP_CHITTI_BABU_KARRI", "IND_43_RAJ_KUMAR_BEERA": "IND_43_RAJ_KUMAR_BEERA", "IND_43_CHEEKURUMELLI_RAVIKUMAR": "IND_43_CHEEKURUMELLI_RAVIKUMAR", "IND_43_RAYUDU_SRI_RAMA_CHANDRA_MURTHY": "IND_43_RAYUDU_SRI_RAMA_CHANDRA_MURTHY", "IPBP_MANIKANTA_SWAMY_KANDREGULA": "IPBP_MANIKANTA_SWAMY_KANDREGULA", "RPI_KH_PANTHAGADA_VIJAYA_CHAKRAVARTHY": "RPI_KH_PANTHAGADA_VIJAYA_CHAKRAVARTHY", "PPOI_AADIMULAM_VENKATESWARA_RAO": "PPOI_AADIMULAM_VENKATESWARA_RAO", "YSRCP_VISWARUPU_PINIPE": "YSRCP_VISWARUPU_PINIPE", "TDP_AITHABATHULA_ANANDARAO": "TDP_AITHABATHULA_ANANDARAO", "JNP_SETTIBATHULA_RAJABABU": "JNP_SETTIBATHULA_RAJABABU", "INC_AITHABATHULA_SUBHASHINI": "INC_AITHABATHULA_SUBHASHINI", "BJP_PEYYALA_SYAMPRASAD": "BJP_PEYYALA_SYAMPRASAD", "IND_44_POTHUMUDI_RAVIKUMAR": "IND_44_POTHUMUDI_RAVIKUMAR", "IND_44_KASI_CHANDRAMOULI": "IND_44_KASI_CHANDRAMOULI", "VCK_BONTHU_VENKATA_RAMANA": "VCK_BONTHU_VENKATA_RAMANA", "PPOI_YADALA_DURGALAKSHMI": "PPOI_YADALA_DURGALAKSHMI", "JNP_RAPAKA_VARA_PRASADA_RAO": "JNP_RAPAKA_VARA_PRASADA_RAO", "YSRCP_RAJESWARA_RAO_BONTHU": "YSRCP_RAJESWARA_RAO_BONTHU", "TDP_GOLLAPALLI_SURYA_RAO": "TDP_GOLLAPALLI_SURYA_RAO", "BJP_BATHULA_LAKSHMI_KUMARI": "BJP_BATHULA_LAKSHMI_KUMARI", "INC_KASI_LAKSHMAN_SWAMMY": "INC_KASI_LAKSHMAN_SWAMMY", "DABAP_CHINTA_DORABABU": "DABAP_CHINTA_DORABABU", "IND_45_POTHUMUDI_ALIVELU_MANGA_TAYARU": "IND_45_POTHUMUDI_ALIVELU_MANGA_TAYARU", "PPOI_MATHA_BHAVANI": "PPOI_MATHA_BHAVANI", "NVSP_GOLLA_BHARATHI": "NVSP_GOLLA_BHARATHI", "PRSHP_BONTHU_RAJESWARA_RAO": "PRSHP_BONTHU_RAJESWARA_RAO", "YSRCP_KONDETI_CHITTI_BABU": "YSRCP_KONDETI_CHITTI_BABU", "TDP_NELAPUDI_STALIN_BABU": "TDP_NELAPUDI_STALIN_BABU", "JNP_PAMULA_RAJESWARI_DEVI": "JNP_PAMULA_RAJESWARI_DEVI", "BJP_KOLLI_SURYA_RAO_SUDHAKAR": "BJP_KOLLI_SURYA_RAO_SUDHAKAR", "IND_46_CHINNAM_RAMESH_BABU": "IND_46_CHINNAM_RAMESH_BABU", "INC_MULAPARTHI_MOHANA_RAO": "INC_MULAPARTHI_MOHANA_RAO", "IND_46_MAKEY_DAVY_PRASAD": "IND_46_MAKEY_DAVY_PRASAD", "IND_46_RAVI_KUMAR_BEERA": "IND_46_RAVI_KUMAR_BEERA", "IPBP_MADDELA_VERA_VENKATA_SATYANARAYANA": "IPBP_MADDELA_VERA_VENKATA_SATYANARAYANA", "PPOI_K_SURENDRA": "PPOI_K_SURENDRA", "YSRCP_CHIRLA_JAGGIREDDY": "YSRCP_CHIRLA_JAGGIREDDY", "TDP_BANDARU_SATYANANDA_RAO": "TDP_BANDARU_SATYANANDA_RAO", "JNP_BANDARU_SRINIVAS_RAO": "JNP_BANDARU_SRINIVAS_RAO", "IND_47_PONUGUPATI_SRINIVASU": "IND_47_PONUGUPATI_SRINIVASU", "BJP_P_SATYANANDAM": "BJP_P_SATYANANDAM", "INC_MUSHINI_RAMAKRISHNA_RAO": "INC_MUSHINI_RAMAKRISHNA_RAO", "IND_47_RAYUDU_CHANDRA_SEKHAR": "IND_47_RAYUDU_CHANDRA_SEKHAR", "PRSHP_SALADI_VEERA_VENKATA_DURGA_SATYANARAYANA_MURTHY": "PRSHP_SALADI_VEERA_VENKATA_DURGA_SATYANARAYANA_MURTHY", "IND_47_MERLA_SASTRULU": "IND_47_MERLA_SASTRULU", "IND_47_PAVULURI_VENKATRAO": "IND_47_PAVULURI_VENKATRAO", "RPI_A_KAPA_KALYAN": "RPI_A_KAPA_KALYAN", "TDP_JOGESWARA_RAO_V": "TDP_JOGESWARA_RAO_V", "YSRCP_PILLI_SUBHAS_CHANDRA_BOSE": "YSRCP_PILLI_SUBHAS_CHANDRA_BOSE", "JNP_LEELA_KRISHNA_VEGULLA": "JNP_LEELA_KRISHNA_VEGULLA", "INC_KAMANA_PRABHAKARARAO": "INC_KAMANA_PRABHAKARARAO", "BJP_KONA_SATYANARAYANA": "BJP_KONA_SATYANARAYANA", "IND_48_DASI_ESWARARAO": "IND_48_DASI_ESWARARAO", "PPOI_NALLAMILLI_VIJAYA_BHASKARA_REDDY": "PPOI_NALLAMILLI_VIJAYA_BHASKARA_REDDY", "IND_48_SATYANARAYANA_MARNI": "IND_48_SATYANARAYANA_MARNI", "IND_48_MANDAPALLI_RAVI": "IND_48_MANDAPALLI_RAVI", "IND_48_KONA_SURYA_BHASKARA_RAO": "IND_48_KONA_SURYA_BHASKARA_RAO", "IND_48_GUTTULA_SRINIVASU": "IND_48_GUTTULA_SRINIVASU", "YSRCP_JAKKAMPUDI_RAJA": "YSRCP_JAKKAMPUDI_RAJA", "TDP_PENDURTHI_VENKATESH": "TDP_PENDURTHI_VENKATESH", "JNP_RAYAPUREDDY_PRASAD_CHINNA": "JNP_RAYAPUREDDY_PRASAD_CHINNA", "INC_SODADASI_MARTIN_LUTHER": "INC_SODADASI_MARTIN_LUTHER", "BJP_A_P_R_CHOWDARY": "BJP_A_P_R_CHOWDARY", "RPC_S_KOTHAPALLI_BHASKARA_RAMAM": "RPC_S_KOTHAPALLI_BHASKARA_RAMAM", "IND_49_PALIVELA_VERABABU": "IND_49_PALIVELA_VERABABU", "APOI_BURIGA_YESUDAS_EX_SERVICE_MAN": "APOI_BURIGA_YESUDAS_EX_SERVICE_MAN", "PRSHP_JAJULA_SATHIBABU": "PRSHP_JAJULA_SATHIBABU", "IND_49_NUNNA_MOHANRAO_CHOWDARY": "IND_49_NUNNA_MOHANRAO_CHOWDARY", "MPP_CHANDRAMALLA_RADHA_RANI": "MPP_CHANDRAMALLA_RADHA_RANI", "PPOI_PUSALA_SITA_RAMBABU": "PPOI_PUSALA_SITA_RAMBABU", "TDP_ADIREDDY_BHAVANI": "TDP_ADIREDDY_BHAVANI", "YSRCP_ROUTHU_SURYA_PRAKASA_RAO": "YSRCP_ROUTHU_SURYA_PRAKASA_RAO", "JNP_ANUSRI_SATYANARAYANA": "JNP_ANUSRI_SATYANARAYANA", "BJP_BOMMULA_DATTU": "BJP_BOMMULA_DATTU", "INC_BODA_VENKAT": "INC_BODA_VENKAT", "RPC_S_MEDA_SRINIVASARAO": "RPC_S_MEDA_SRINIVASARAO", "IND_50_NUNNA_MOHANRAO_CHOWDARY": "IND_50_NUNNA_MOHANRAO_CHOWDARY", "IND_50_NUNNAM_RAMAKRISHNA": "IND_50_NUNNAM_RAMAKRISHNA", "PPOI_CHEKURI_SAIRAJU": "PPOI_CHEKURI_SAIRAJU", "IND_50_KANDAVALLI_SOLOMON_RAJU_SALMAN": "IND_50_KANDAVALLI_SOLOMON_RAJU_SALMAN", "MPP_PULAGURTHA_DOSALA_RAJU": "MPP_PULAGURTHA_DOSALA_RAJU", "TDP_GORANTLA_BUTCHAIAH_CHOUDARY": "TDP_GORANTLA_BUTCHAIAH_CHOUDARY", "YSRCP_AKULA_VEERRAJU": "YSRCP_AKULA_VEERRAJU", "JNP_KANDULA_DURGESH": "JNP_KANDULA_DURGESH", "INC_RAYUDU_RAJAVALLI": "INC_RAYUDU_RAJAVALLI", "BJP_AKULA_SRIDHAR": "BJP_AKULA_SRIDHAR", "DABAP_KONTHAM_DURGA_PRASAD": "DABAP_KONTHAM_DURGA_PRASAD", "IND_51_KADALI_VENKATESWARA_RAO": "IND_51_KADALI_VENKATESWARA_RAO", "JAJGP_DODDA_SRINIVASA_RAO": "JAJGP_DODDA_SRINIVASA_RAO", "IND_51_VENKATESHWARA_RAO_GALI": "IND_51_VENKATESHWARA_RAO_GALI", "IND_51_GOLLAPALLI_ATCHUTH_KUMAR": "IND_51_GOLLAPALLI_ATCHUTH_KUMAR", "IND_51_KIRAN_KUMAR_GUNIPE": "IND_51_KIRAN_KUMAR_GUNIPE", "PPOI_VIJAYADURGA_KASINADHUNI": "PPOI_VIJAYADURGA_KASINADHUNI", "MPP_P_V_L_PRASANNA_KUMARI": "MPP_P_V_L_PRASANNA_KUMARI", "WPOI_RICHMOND_CAREY_KOLLABATHULA": "WPOI_RICHMOND_CAREY_KOLLABATHULA", "YSRCP_JYOTHULA_CHANTI_BABU": "YSRCP_JYOTHULA_CHANTI_BABU", "TDP_JYOTHULA_NEHRU": "TDP_JYOTHULA_NEHRU", "JNP_PATAMSETTI_SURYA_CHANDRA": "JNP_PATAMSETTI_SURYA_CHANDRA", "INC_MAROTHI_SIVA_GANESH": "INC_MAROTHI_SIVA_GANESH", "BJP_VARALABABU_SRIVATSAVAYA": "BJP_VARALABABU_SRIVATSAVAYA", "SAPRP_BODDETI_APPARAO": "SAPRP_BODDETI_APPARAO", "PRSHP_KENNEDY_MUPPIDI": "PRSHP_KENNEDY_MUPPIDI", "PPOI_LOKESWARARAO_SANA": "PPOI_LOKESWARARAO_SANA", "MPP_PALURI_GANAPATHI": "MPP_PALURI_GANAPATHI", "CPI_ML_L_JAGGAMPUDI_RAJUBABU": "CPI_ML_L_JAGGAMPUDI_RAJUBABU", "RPI_NAGESWARARAO_JUTHUKA": "RPI_NAGESWARARAO_JUTHUKA", "YSRCP_NAGULAPALLI_DHANALAKSHMI": "YSRCP_NAGULAPALLI_DHANALAKSHMI", "TDP_VANTHALA_RAJESWARI": "TDP_VANTHALA_RAJESWARI", "CPM_RAJAIAH_SUNNAM": "CPM_RAJAIAH_SUNNAM", "INC_GONDI_BALAIAH": "INC_GONDI_BALAIAH", "IND_53_KUNJAM_V_V_S_N_DORA": "IND_53_KUNJAM_V_V_S_N_DORA", "IND_53_PALLALA_LATCHI_REDDY": "IND_53_PALLALA_LATCHI_REDDY", "IND_53_PALLALA_RAJAKUMAR_REDDY": "IND_53_PALLALA_RAJAKUMAR_REDDY", "BJP_TURSAM_SUBBA_RAO": "BJP_TURSAM_SUBBA_RAO", "IND_53_KOMARAM_PURNA_RADHA_KRISHNA_PHANEESWARI": "IND_53_KOMARAM_PURNA_RADHA_KRISHNA_PHANEESWARI", "IND_53_PARASIKKA_PRAKHASH_RAO": "IND_53_PARASIKKA_PRAKHASH_RAO", "IND_53_KUNJA_SRINU": "IND_53_KUNJA_SRINU", "IND_53_JULUVA_YETHI_RAJULU": "IND_53_JULUVA_YETHI_RAJULU", "IND_53_KODI_SUJATHA": "IND_53_KODI_SUJATHA", "PPOI_GADA_PARVATHI": "PPOI_GADA_PARVATHI", "CPI_ML_L_SOMALA_KUSALA": "CPI_ML_L_SOMALA_KUSALA", "YSRCP_TANETI_VANITA": "YSRCP_TANETI_VANITA", "TDP_ANITHA_VANGALAPUDI": "TDP_ANITHA_VANGALAPUDI", "BSP_RAVI_KUMAR_MURTHY_TAMBALLAPALLI": "BSP_RAVI_KUMAR_MURTHY_TAMBALLAPALLI", "INC_ARIGELA_ARUNA_KUMARI": "INC_ARIGELA_ARUNA_KUMARI", "BJP_BUSI_SURENDRANADH_BENARJI": "BJP_BUSI_SURENDRANADH_BENARJI", "JAJGP_ETHAKOTA_SAILA": "JAJGP_ETHAKOTA_SAILA", "IPBP_BONTA_SYAM_RAVI_PRAKASH": "IPBP_BONTA_SYAM_RAVI_PRAKASH", "IND_54_G_V_R": "IND_54_G_V_R", "IND_54_JALEM_MANOHAR": "IND_54_JALEM_MANOHAR", "IND_54_KOKKIRIPATI_CHINABABU": "IND_54_KOKKIRIPATI_CHINABABU", "IND_54_KVK": "IND_54_KVK", "YSRCP_G_SRINIVAS_NAIDU": "YSRCP_G_SRINIVAS_NAIDU", "TDP_BURUGUPALLI_SESHARAO": "TDP_BURUGUPALLI_SESHARAO", "JNP_ATIKALA_NAGA_VENKATA_KUSUMANJALI_RAMYA_SRI": "JNP_ATIKALA_NAGA_VENKATA_KUSUMANJALI_RAMYA_SRI", "BJP_LINGAMPALLI_VENKATESWARARAO": "BJP_LINGAMPALLI_VENKATESWARARAO", "INC_PEDDIREDDY_SUBBARAO": "INC_PEDDIREDDY_SUBBARAO", "IND_55_CHITTURI_SURYANARAYANA": "IND_55_CHITTURI_SURYANARAYANA", "IND_55_SHAIK_ASIF": "IND_55_SHAIK_ASIF", "PPOI_ANNAVARA_PRASAD_MUKKAMALA": "PPOI_ANNAVARA_PRASAD_MUKKAMALA", "PRSHP_GUDAPATI_SRINIVASU": "PRSHP_GUDAPATI_SRINIVASU", "IND_55_J_N_V_S_PRAKASH": "IND_55_J_N_V_S_PRAKASH", "YSRCP_CHERUKUVADA_SRIRANGANADHA_RAJU": "YSRCP_CHERUKUVADA_SRIRANGANADHA_RAJU", "TDP_SATYANARAYANA_PITHANI": "TDP_SATYANARAYANA_PITHANI", "JNP_JAVVADI_VIJAY_VENKATRAM": "JNP_JAVVADI_VIJAY_VENKATRAM", "INC_NEKKANTI_VENKATA_SATYANARAYANA_SATISH": "INC_NEKKANTI_VENKATA_SATYANARAYANA_SATISH", "BJP_YEDIDA_KODANDA_CHAKRAPANI": "BJP_YEDIDA_KODANDA_CHAKRAPANI", "IND_56_NANNETI_PUSHPA_RAJU": "IND_56_NANNETI_PUSHPA_RAJU", "IND_56_PALINGI_KANAKA_RATNAM": "IND_56_PALINGI_KANAKA_RATNAM", "IND_56_SIKILE_RATNA_RAJU": "IND_56_SIKILE_RATNA_RAJU", "IND_56_CHERUKUVADA_VENKATA_RAO": "IND_56_CHERUKUVADA_VENKATA_RAO", "IND_56_SRIVYSHNAVA_RAO_MURALI_NAKKA": "IND_56_SRIVYSHNAVA_RAO_MURALI_NAKKA", "PPOI_NEKKANTI_ANITHA": "PPOI_NEKKANTI_ANITHA", "IND_56_GOTTUMUKKALA_SHIVAJI_KING": "IND_56_GOTTUMUKKALA_SHIVAJI_KING", "IND_56_KARRI_NAGA_SATYANARAYANA_REDDY": "IND_56_KARRI_NAGA_SATYANARAYANA_REDDY", "TDP_DR_NIMMALA_RAMANAIDU": "TDP_DR_NIMMALA_RAMANAIDU", "YSRCP_DR_SATYANARAYANA_MURTY_CHAVATAPALLI_DR_BABJI": "YSRCP_DR_SATYANARAYANA_MURTY_CHAVATAPALLI_DR_BABJI", "JNP_GUNNAM_NARASIMHA_NAGENDRA_RAO_GUNNAM_NAGABABU": "JNP_GUNNAM_NARASIMHA_NAGENDRA_RAO_GUNNAM_NAGABABU", "SP_PONNAPALLI_RAMA_SACHITHANAND": "SP_PONNAPALLI_RAMA_SACHITHANAND", "INC_SATYANARAYANA_BABJI_VARDHINEEDI": "INC_SATYANARAYANA_BABJI_VARDHINEEDI", "BJP_RAVURI_LAKSHMANA_SWAMY_SUDHA": "BJP_RAVURI_LAKSHMANA_SWAMY_SUDHA", "IND_57_PALAPARTHI_JOHNSON": "IND_57_PALAPARTHI_JOHNSON", "PPOI_GAMPALA_MALLIKARJUNA_RAO": "PPOI_GAMPALA_MALLIKARJUNA_RAO", "IND_57_MEDIDHI_RAJA_BABU": "IND_57_MEDIDHI_RAJA_BABU", "IND_57_ADABALA_SATEESH": "IND_57_ADABALA_SATEESH", "IND_57_SRINIVAS_MANDELA": "IND_57_SRINIVAS_MANDELA", "IND_57_NAVUDURI_NARASIMHA_RAO": "IND_57_NAVUDURI_NARASIMHA_RAO", "IND_57_GOTTUMUKKALA_SHIVAJI": "IND_57_GOTTUMUKKALA_SHIVAJI", "YSRCP_MUDUNURI_PRASADA_RAJU": "YSRCP_MUDUNURI_PRASADA_RAJU", "JNP_BOMMIDI_NAYAKER": "JNP_BOMMIDI_NAYAKER", "TDP_BANDARU_MADHAVA_NAIDU": "TDP_BANDARU_MADHAVA_NAIDU", "INC_BOMMIDI_RAVI_SRINIVAS": "INC_BOMMIDI_RAVI_SRINIVAS", "BJP_PULAPARTHI_VENKATESWARA_RAO": "BJP_PULAPARTHI_VENKATESWARA_RAO", "IND_58_GADI_RAVI": "IND_58_GADI_RAVI", "IND_58_NALLI_RAJESH": "IND_58_NALLI_RAJESH", "PRSHP_K_A_PAUL": "PRSHP_K_A_PAUL", "PPOI_GOOTI_DURGARAO": "PPOI_GOOTI_DURGARAO", "IND_58_GOLLA_VIJAYABABU": "IND_58_GOLLA_VIJAYABABU", "SP_T_RAJESH_BABU": "SP_T_RAJESH_BABU", "IND_58_METLA_RAMANJANEYULU": "IND_58_METLA_RAMANJANEYULU", "NVSP_NALLI_RAJA_BABU": "NVSP_NALLI_RAJA_BABU", "IND_58_KADALI_VENKATA_LAKSHMI": "IND_58_KADALI_VENKATA_LAKSHMI", "YSRCP_GRANDHI_SRINIVAS": "YSRCP_GRANDHI_SRINIVAS", "TDP_RAMANJANEYULU_PULAPARTHI_ANJIBABU": "TDP_RAMANJANEYULU_PULAPARTHI_ANJIBABU", "BJP_KAAYITHA_SURENDRA": "BJP_KAAYITHA_SURENDRA", "INC_ADDANKI_DORA_BABU": "INC_ADDANKI_DORA_BABU", "IND_59_MAMIDI_SIVA_KUMAR": "IND_59_MAMIDI_SIVA_KUMAR", "PPOI_MOHANDAS_KARAMCHAND_GANDHI_KANCHERLA": "PPOI_MOHANDAS_KARAMCHAND_GANDHI_KANCHERLA", "IND_59_NALLI_RAJESH": "IND_59_NALLI_RAJESH", "IND_59_SANTHOSH_KUMAR_PENTAPATI": "IND_59_SANTHOSH_KUMAR_PENTAPATI", "IPBP_SRINIVAS_BONTHU": "IPBP_SRINIVAS_BONTHU", "IND_59_PAWAN_KUMAR_POLISETTY": "IND_59_PAWAN_KUMAR_POLISETTY", "IND_59_DR_JALLI_VENKATESH": "IND_59_DR_JALLI_VENKATESH", "IND_59_RAISINGSUN_GANAPUREDDY": "IND_59_RAISINGSUN_GANAPUREDDY", "TDP_MANTENA_RAMARAJU_KALAPUDI_RAMBABU": "TDP_MANTENA_RAMARAJU_KALAPUDI_RAMBABU", "YSRCP_P_V_L_NARASIMHA_RAJU": "YSRCP_P_V_L_NARASIMHA_RAJU", "CPM_BHUPATHIRAJU_BALARAM": "CPM_BHUPATHIRAJU_BALARAM", "INC_GADHIRAJU_LATCHIRAJU": "INC_GADHIRAJU_LATCHIRAJU", "BJP_ALLURI_VENKATA_SATYANARAYANA_RAJU": "BJP_ALLURI_VENKATA_SATYANARAYANA_RAJU", "IPBP_JOHN_RAJU_DAIVA_VANI_MERUGU": "IPBP_JOHN_RAJU_DAIVA_VANI_MERUGU", "IND_60_PALLEM_YESU_RATNAM": "IND_60_PALLEM_YESU_RATNAM", "IND_60_PRODDUVAKA_RAJKUMAR": "IND_60_PRODDUVAKA_RAJKUMAR", "RPI_A_RUDRARAJU_KASI_ANNAPURNA": "RPI_A_RUDRARAJU_KASI_ANNAPURNA", "PPOI_SATISH_CHANDRA_KUMAR_ALLURI": "PPOI_SATISH_CHANDRA_KUMAR_ALLURI", "YSRCP_KARUMURI_VENKATA_NAGESWARA_RAO": "YSRCP_KARUMURI_VENKATA_NAGESWARA_RAO", "TDP_ARIMILLI_RADHA_KRISHNA": "TDP_ARIMILLI_RADHA_KRISHNA", "JNP_PASUPULETI_VENKATA_RAMARAO_PVR": "JNP_PASUPULETI_VENKATA_RAMARAO_PVR", "BJP_MALLINA_VENKATA_RADHAKRISHNA_RAO": "BJP_MALLINA_VENKATA_RADHAKRISHNA_RAO", "INC_BOKKA_BHASKARA_RAO": "INC_BOKKA_BHASKARA_RAO", "IND_61_GULIPILLI_SRINIVASA_RAO": "IND_61_GULIPILLI_SRINIVASA_RAO", "IND_61_BEZAWADA_RAMA_SURYA_RAO": "IND_61_BEZAWADA_RAMA_SURYA_RAO", "IND_61_MALLINA_JANARDHANA_RAO": "IND_61_MALLINA_JANARDHANA_RAO", "IND_61_AKKINA_BAPINEEDU": "IND_61_AKKINA_BAPINEEDU", "IND_61_GANNAMANI_RAMAKRISHNA": "IND_61_GANNAMANI_RAMAKRISHNA", "IND_61_POLISETTY_SRINIVASA_RAO": "IND_61_POLISETTY_SRINIVASA_RAO", "IND_61_CHEGONDI_HARIBABU": "IND_61_CHEGONDI_HARIBABU", "YSRCP_KOTTU_SATYANARAYANA": "YSRCP_KOTTU_SATYANARAYANA", "TDP_ELI_VENKATA_MADHUSUDHANARAO_NANI": "TDP_ELI_VENKATA_MADHUSUDHANARAO_NANI", "JNP_BOLISETTI_SRINIVAS": "JNP_BOLISETTI_SRINIVAS", "BJP_GATTIM_MANIKYALA_RAO": "BJP_GATTIM_MANIKYALA_RAO", "INC_M_SEKHAR_BABJI": "INC_M_SEKHAR_BABJI", "RPI_MARAPATLA_RAJU": "RPI_MARAPATLA_RAJU", "IND_62_VEGI_SATYANARAYANA": "IND_62_VEGI_SATYANARAYANA", "IND_62_SIMHACHALAM_SIRIVARAPU": "IND_62_SIMHACHALAM_SIRIVARAPU", "IND_62_SRIRAMULA_NAGESWARARAO": "IND_62_SRIRAMULA_NAGESWARARAO", "IND_62_PYBOINA_BABLOO": "IND_62_PYBOINA_BABLOO", "PPOI_VENKATA_SOMESWARA_RAO_TATAVARTHI_SOMU": "PPOI_VENKATA_SOMESWARA_RAO_TATAVARTHI_SOMU", "IND_62_PALAPARTHI_VEERA_VENKATA_SATYANARAYANA_BADRAM": "IND_62_PALAPARTHI_VEERA_VENKATA_SATYANARAYANA_BADRAM", "IND_62_BUSANABOYINA_ANJANEYULU": "IND_62_BUSANABOYINA_ANJANEYULU", "YSRCP_PUPPALA_SRINIVASARAO_VASUBABU": "YSRCP_PUPPALA_SRINIVASARAO_VASUBABU", "TDP_GANNI_VEERANJANEYULU": "TDP_GANNI_VEERANJANEYULU", "JNP_NOWDU_VENKATA_RAMANA_RAMANA_BABU": "JNP_NOWDU_VENKATA_RAMANA_RAMANA_BABU", "BJP_INTI_UDAYA_BHASKARARAO": "BJP_INTI_UDAYA_BHASKARARAO", "INC_HARI_KUMARA_RAJU_PATHAPATI": "INC_HARI_KUMARA_RAJU_PATHAPATI", "IND_63_VUDATALA_SRINIVASARAO": "IND_63_VUDATALA_SRINIVASARAO", "NVSP_GEDDAM_NAGA_VIGNESWARA_RAO": "NVSP_GEDDAM_NAGA_VIGNESWARA_RAO", "IND_63_VUPPALA_SRINIVAS": "IND_63_VUPPALA_SRINIVAS", "YSRCP_ABBAYA_CHOWDARY_KOTHARI": "YSRCP_ABBAYA_CHOWDARY_KOTHARI", "TDP_CHINTHAMANENI_PRABHAKAR": "TDP_CHINTHAMANENI_PRABHAKAR", "JNP_GHANTASALA_VENKATA_LAKSHMI": "JNP_GHANTASALA_VENKATA_LAKSHMI", "INC_DOPPALAPUDI_VENKATA_RAMA_KRISHNA_CHOWDARY": "INC_DOPPALAPUDI_VENKATA_RAMA_KRISHNA_CHOWDARY", "IND_64_KOMMINA_AGASTEEN": "IND_64_KOMMINA_AGASTEEN", "BJP_BALAKRISHNA_YALAMARTHI": "BJP_BALAKRISHNA_YALAMARTHI", "IND_64_KONGARA_RAMESH": "IND_64_KONGARA_RAMESH", "PRSHP_AADHI_SRIMANNARAYANA_CHALLAGOLLA": "PRSHP_AADHI_SRIMANNARAYANA_CHALLAGOLLA", "IND_64_ADAM_DEVARAPALLI": "IND_64_ADAM_DEVARAPALLI", "NVSP_CHANDRA_MOULI_UDARAGONDI": "NVSP_CHANDRA_MOULI_UDARAGONDI", "IPBP_BUDDULA_ANITHA": "IPBP_BUDDULA_ANITHA", "PPOI_MEKA_VENKATESWARA_RAO": "PPOI_MEKA_VENKATESWARA_RAO", "YSRCP_ALLA_KALI_KRISHNA_SRINIVAS_ALLA_NANI": "YSRCP_ALLA_KALI_KRISHNA_SRINIVAS_ALLA_NANI", "TDP_BADETI_KOTA_RAMA_RAO_BUJJI": "TDP_BADETI_KOTA_RAMA_RAO_BUJJI", "JNP_APPALA_NAIDU_REDDY": "JNP_APPALA_NAIDU_REDDY", "INC_RAJANALA_RAMAMOHANA_RAO": "INC_RAJANALA_RAMAMOHANA_RAO", "BJP_NAGAM_CHANDRA_NAGA_SIVA_VARA_PRASAD_SIVA": "BJP_NAGAM_CHANDRA_NAGA_SIVA_VARA_PRASAD_SIVA", "PPOI_VEERA_RAGHAVULU_GODUGUPATI_RAGHAVA": "PPOI_VEERA_RAGHAVULU_GODUGUPATI_RAGHAVA", "IND_65_SITARAMAIAH_SUNKARA": "IND_65_SITARAMAIAH_SUNKARA", "IND_65_PALIPE_MYARIO": "IND_65_PALIPE_MYARIO", "YSRCP_VENKATRAO_TALARI": "YSRCP_VENKATRAO_TALARI", "TDP_MUPPIDI_VENKATESWARA_RAO": "TDP_MUPPIDI_VENKATESWARA_RAO", "BSP_SIRRA_BHARATHA_RAO": "BSP_SIRRA_BHARATHA_RAO", "INC_NUTHALAPATI_M_VARA_PRASAD": "INC_NUTHALAPATI_M_VARA_PRASAD", "BJP_DUNNA_SUMAN_BABU": "BJP_DUNNA_SUMAN_BABU", "IND_66_MARAPATLA_SRINIVASARAO": "IND_66_MARAPATLA_SRINIVASARAO", "MPP_IRLAPATI_PRAVEEN_KUMAR": "MPP_IRLAPATI_PRAVEEN_KUMAR", "YSRCP_TELLAM_BALA_RAJU": "YSRCP_TELLAM_BALA_RAJU", "TDP_BORAGAM_SRINIVASULU": "TDP_BORAGAM_SRINIVASULU", "JNP_CHIRRI_BALARAJU": "JNP_CHIRRI_BALARAJU", "INC_KANITHI_RAMA_CHANDRA_SEKHAR_CHANDRA_SEKHAR": "INC_KANITHI_RAMA_CHANDRA_SEKHAR_CHANDRA_SEKHAR", "IND_67_DHARMULA_SURESH": "IND_67_DHARMULA_SURESH", "BJP_BORAGAM_VENKATA_LAKSHMI": "BJP_BORAGAM_VENKATA_LAKSHMI", "IND_67_SUNNAM_SOMA_RAJU": "IND_67_SUNNAM_SOMA_RAJU", "IND_67_KAKA_NAGAMANI": "IND_67_KAKA_NAGAMANI", "AIFB_MADAKAM_VENKATESWARAO": "AIFB_MADAKAM_VENKATESWARAO", "NVSP_ANANDA_RAO_GAJJALA": "NVSP_ANANDA_RAO_GAJJALA", "IPBP_KAKA_JAYA_PRAVEEN_KUMAR": "IPBP_KAKA_JAYA_PRAVEEN_KUMAR", "YSRCP_VUNNAMATLA_RAKADA_ELIZA": "YSRCP_VUNNAMATLA_RAKADA_ELIZA", "TDP_KARRA_RAJARAO": "TDP_KARRA_RAJARAO", "JNP_MEKA_ESWARIAH": "JNP_MEKA_ESWARIAH", "INC_MARUMUDI_THOMAS": "INC_MARUMUDI_THOMAS", "BJP_CHOWTAPALLI_VIKRAM_KISHORE": "BJP_CHOWTAPALLI_VIKRAM_KISHORE", "IND_68_SONGA_KARTHEEK": "IND_68_SONGA_KARTHEEK", "PPOI_SIMHACHALAM_POTLURI": "PPOI_SIMHACHALAM_POTLURI", "IND_68_NALLAMELLI_SANKARA_RAO": "IND_68_NALLAMELLI_SANKARA_RAO", "IND_68_KALI_LAKSHMANARAJU": "IND_68_KALI_LAKSHMANARAJU", "IND_68_KALAPALA_PRASAD": "IND_68_KALAPALA_PRASAD", "YSRCP_KOKKILIGADDA_RAKSHANA_NIDHI": "YSRCP_KOKKILIGADDA_RAKSHANA_NIDHI", "TDP_KOTHAPALLI_SAMUEL_JAWAHAR": "TDP_KOTHAPALLI_SAMUEL_JAWAHAR", "BSP_NAMBURI_SRINIVASA_RAO": "BSP_NAMBURI_SRINIVASA_RAO", "INC_RAJIV_RATAN_PARASA": "INC_RAJIV_RATAN_PARASA", "IND_69_KOLIKAPOGU_VENKATA_RAO": "IND_69_KOLIKAPOGU_VENKATA_RAO", "BJP_POLE_SANTHI": "BJP_POLE_SANTHI", "RPI_DUBBAKU_SUDHAKAR": "RPI_DUBBAKU_SUDHAKAR", "IND_69_KALLEPALLI_TULASAMMA": "IND_69_KALLEPALLI_TULASAMMA", "IND_69_KOKKERAGADA_VENKATESWARA_RAO": "IND_69_KOKKERAGADA_VENKATESWARA_RAO", "MPP_MEKALA_NAGARAJU": "MPP_MEKALA_NAGARAJU", "IND_69_K_ANANTHA_RANI": "IND_69_K_ANANTHA_RANI", "PPOI_BADUGU_KRANTHI_KUMAR": "PPOI_BADUGU_KRANTHI_KUMAR", "YSRCP_MEKA_VENKATA_PRATAP_APPARAO": "YSRCP_MEKA_VENKATA_PRATAP_APPARAO", "TDP_MUDDARABOINA_VENKATESWARARAO": "TDP_MUDDARABOINA_VENKATESWARARAO", "JNP_BASAVA_VAYKUNTA_VENKATA_BHASKARA_RAO": "JNP_BASAVA_VAYKUNTA_VENKATA_BHASKARA_RAO", "INC_B_D_RAVI_KUMAR": "INC_B_D_RAVI_KUMAR", "BJP_BOMMAREDDY_VENKATA_NAGA_CHANDRAREDDY": "BJP_BOMMAREDDY_VENKATA_NAGA_CHANDRAREDDY", "ANC_KAPPAREDDY_PRAVEEN_KUMAR": "ANC_KAPPAREDDY_PRAVEEN_KUMAR", "IND_70_SOMU_VENKATA_SIVA_PURNA_CHANDRARAO": "IND_70_SOMU_VENKATA_SIVA_PURNA_CHANDRARAO", "IND_70_ANNE_VANAJA": "IND_70_ANNE_VANAJA", "IND_70_DURISETI_ASHOK_KUMAR": "IND_70_DURISETI_ASHOK_KUMAR", "RPI_PRATHIPATI_AMBEDKAR": "RPI_PRATHIPATI_AMBEDKAR", "PPOI_KHAMBHAMPATI_POORNA_CHANDRARAO": "PPOI_KHAMBHAMPATI_POORNA_CHANDRARAO", "TDP_VAMSI_VALLABHANENI": "TDP_VAMSI_VALLABHANENI", "YSRCP_YARLAGADDA_VENKATRAO": "YSRCP_YARLAGADDA_VENKATRAO", "CPI_AFSAR_SYED": "CPI_AFSAR_SYED", "INC_VEERA_BHADRA_PRASAD_SUNKARA": "INC_VEERA_BHADRA_PRASAD_SUNKARA", "DABAP_ADDANKI_AMOS": "DABAP_ADDANKI_AMOS", "BJP_DAMARLA_KOTESWARARAO": "BJP_DAMARLA_KOTESWARARAO", "IND_71_SURAPANENI_RAMAKRISHNA": "IND_71_SURAPANENI_RAMAKRISHNA", "IND_71_SUDHEER_KUMAR_GUDAPATI": "IND_71_SUDHEER_KUMAR_GUDAPATI", "PP_AJAY_KUMAR_GHOSH_ANNAM": "PP_AJAY_KUMAR_GHOSH_ANNAM", "IND_71_KOLLI_BRAHMARAO": "IND_71_KOLLI_BRAHMARAO", "PRSHP_YARLAGADDA_VENKATARAMAIAH_CHOWDARY": "PRSHP_YARLAGADDA_VENKATARAMAIAH_CHOWDARY", "PPOI_CHANGANTIPATI_GANDHI": "PPOI_CHANGANTIPATI_GANDHI", "IND_71_KALAPARTHI_BHASKARARAO": "IND_71_KALAPARTHI_BHASKARARAO", "MPP_DASARI_BHAGYALAKSHMI": "MPP_DASARI_BHAGYALAKSHMI", "YSRCP_KODALI_SRI_VENKATESWARA_RAO_NANI": "YSRCP_KODALI_SRI_VENKATESWARA_RAO_NANI", "TDP_DEVINENI_AVINASH": "TDP_DEVINENI_AVINASH", "INC_DATTATREYULU_SISTLA": "INC_DATTATREYULU_SISTLA", "BJP_SRI_RAJA_BABU_GUTTIKONDA": "BJP_SRI_RAJA_BABU_GUTTIKONDA", "IND_72_ESSAKU_MADDALI": "IND_72_ESSAKU_MADDALI", "IND_72_AVINASH_G": "IND_72_AVINASH_G", "PRSHP_KODALI_VENKATESWARA_RAO": "PRSHP_KODALI_VENKATESWARA_RAO", "PPOI_GUNDAPANENI_RAJAKUMARI": "PPOI_GUNDAPANENI_RAJAKUMARI", "IND_72_BOYINA_BOYINA_SRI_SIVA_VENKATA_SATYANARAYANA": "IND_72_BOYINA_BOYINA_SRI_SIVA_VENKATA_SATYANARAYANA", "IND_72_AMBEDKAR_GUNDABATHINA": "IND_72_AMBEDKAR_GUNDABATHINA", "IND_72_AHAMED_NOOR": "IND_72_AHAMED_NOOR", "IND_72_NAGARAJU_VADDADI": "IND_72_NAGARAJU_VADDADI", "YSRCP_DULAM_NAGESWARA_RAO_DNR": "YSRCP_DULAM_NAGESWARA_RAO_DNR", "TDP_JAYAMANGALA_VENKATA_RAMANA": "TDP_JAYAMANGALA_VENKATA_RAMANA", "JNP_B_V_RAO_BUSANABOYINA_VENKATESWARA_RAO": "JNP_B_V_RAO_BUSANABOYINA_VENKATESWARA_RAO", "BJP_KEERTHI_VENKATA_RAMAPRASAD": "BJP_KEERTHI_VENKATA_RAMAPRASAD", "INC_N_PETER_PAUL_PRASAD_CHITTI": "INC_N_PETER_PAUL_PRASAD_CHITTI", "IND_73_SUVARNA_RAJU_VEERABATTINA": "IND_73_SUVARNA_RAJU_VEERABATTINA", "IND_73_SONTI_KUMARA_SWAMY_KUMAR": "IND_73_SONTI_KUMARA_SWAMY_KUMAR", "IND_73_B_SITA_ANNAPURNA": "IND_73_B_SITA_ANNAPURNA", "RPI_A_DAVIDRAJU_SADEY": "RPI_A_DAVIDRAJU_SADEY", "IND_73_K_K_NAGARAJU": "IND_73_K_K_NAGARAJU", "PRSHP_SOMESWARA_RAO_ALUMOLU": "PRSHP_SOMESWARA_RAO_ALUMOLU", "PPOI_G_PRASUNAMBA": "PPOI_G_PRASUNAMBA", "IND_73_G_SATISH_KUMAR": "IND_73_G_SATISH_KUMAR", "IND_73_BHUPATHIRAJU_RAMESH_KUMAR_RAJU": "IND_73_BHUPATHIRAJU_RAMESH_KUMAR_RAJU", "YSRCP_JOGI_RAMESH": "YSRCP_JOGI_RAMESH", "TDP_KAGITHA_KRISHNA_PRASAD": "TDP_KAGITHA_KRISHNA_PRASAD", "JNP_ANKEM_LAKSHMI_SRINIVAS": "JNP_ANKEM_LAKSHMI_SRINIVAS", "INC_VENKATA_RAJU_SATTINENI": "INC_VENKATA_RAJU_SATTINENI", "BJP_SODESETTI_BALAJI_RAO": "BJP_SODESETTI_BALAJI_RAO", "IPBP_CHINTA_NAGA_RAJU": "IPBP_CHINTA_NAGA_RAJU", "IND_74_MURTY_RAJU_KOSANAM": "IND_74_MURTY_RAJU_KOSANAM", "PPOI_PUPPALA_VENKATA_SWAMY": "PPOI_PUPPALA_VENKATA_SWAMY", "AINPP_MUTYALA_VENKATA_SWAMI": "AINPP_MUTYALA_VENKATA_SWAMI", "YSRCP_PERNI_VENKATARAMAIAH_NANI": "YSRCP_PERNI_VENKATARAMAIAH_NANI", "TDP_KOLLU_RAVINDRA": "TDP_KOLLU_RAVINDRA", "JNP_BANDI_RAMA_KRISHNA": "JNP_BANDI_RAMA_KRISHNA", "INC_MAHAMMAD_DADA_SAHEB": "INC_MAHAMMAD_DADA_SAHEB", "BJP_PANTAM_VENKATA_GAJENDRA_RAO": "BJP_PANTAM_VENKATA_GAJENDRA_RAO", "PRSHP_PENTA_V_V_NAGA_MURALIDHAR": "PRSHP_PENTA_V_V_NAGA_MURALIDHAR", "IND_75_VADLAMUDI_SESHA_SAI_DURGA_RAO": "IND_75_VADLAMUDI_SESHA_SAI_DURGA_RAO", "PPOI_VADAPALLI_RAGHUNADH": "PPOI_VADAPALLI_RAGHUNADH", "YSRCP_RAMESH_BABU_SIMHADRI": "YSRCP_RAMESH_BABU_SIMHADRI", "TDP_BUDDHAPRASAD_MANDALI": "TDP_BUDDHAPRASAD_MANDALI", "JNP_MUTTAMSETTY_KRISHNA_RAO": "JNP_MUTTAMSETTY_KRISHNA_RAO", "AIFB_KANTAMNENI_RAVI_SHANKAR": "AIFB_KANTAMNENI_RAVI_SHANKAR", "INC_ANDE_SRIRAMA_MURTHY": "INC_ANDE_SRIRAMA_MURTHY", "BJP_G_V_NAGARAYALU": "BJP_G_V_NAGARAYALU", "PRSTP_GUDIVAKA_SRIMANNARAYANA": "PRSTP_GUDIVAKA_SRIMANNARAYANA", "IPBP_PARASA_NAGAMALLESWARARAO": "IPBP_PARASA_NAGAMALLESWARARAO", "IND_76_RAGHAVENDRARAO_SIMHADRI": "IND_76_RAGHAVENDRARAO_SIMHADRI", "IND_76_ANAND_KUMAR_VENTRAPRAGADA": "IND_76_ANAND_KUMAR_VENTRAPRAGADA", "PPOI_VENKATA_NANCHARAIAH_MUNGARA": "PPOI_VENKATA_NANCHARAIAH_MUNGARA", "IND_76_KODALI_SUNEELA": "IND_76_KODALI_SUNEELA", "YSRCP_ANIL_KUMAR_KAILE": "YSRCP_ANIL_KUMAR_KAILE", "TDP_UPPULETI_KALPANA": "TDP_UPPULETI_KALPANA", "BSP_JHANSI_RANI_MEDEPALLI": "BSP_JHANSI_RANI_MEDEPALLI", "INC_MOVVA_MOHANA_RAO": "INC_MOVVA_MOHANA_RAO", "BJP_VALAPARLA_VENKATESWARA_RAO": "BJP_VALAPARLA_VENKATESWARA_RAO", "IND_77_GANDRAPU_ASHOK_BABU": "IND_77_GANDRAPU_ASHOK_BABU", "IND_77_MANGAM_RAJA_MANOHAR": "IND_77_MANGAM_RAJA_MANOHAR", "RPI_REBBA_CHANDRA_RAO": "RPI_REBBA_CHANDRA_RAO", "IND_77_DOPPALAPUDI_AJAY_BABU": "IND_77_DOPPALAPUDI_AJAY_BABU", "AINPP_KOLLURI_BENARJI": "AINPP_KOLLURI_BENARJI", "IND_77_ARISE_KRISHNA_PRASAD": "IND_77_ARISE_KRISHNA_PRASAD", "YSRCP_KOLUSU_PARTHA_SARATHY": "YSRCP_KOLUSU_PARTHA_SARATHY", "TDP_BODE_PRASAD": "TDP_BODE_PRASAD", "BSP_KARUNAKAR_DAS_LANKA": "BSP_KARUNAKAR_DAS_LANKA", "INC_LAM_THANTIYA_KUMARI": "INC_LAM_THANTIYA_KUMARI", "BJP_GOPISETTY_DURGA_PRASAD": "BJP_GOPISETTY_DURGA_PRASAD", "RPI_KONA_VIJAYA_BABU": "RPI_KONA_VIJAYA_BABU", "PRSHP_PARTHASARADHI_VEMURI": "PRSHP_PARTHASARADHI_VEMURI", "IND_78_PADAMATA_KRISHNA_PRASAD": "IND_78_PADAMATA_KRISHNA_PRASAD", "ALLJP_AMBATI_SIVANAGA_MALLESWARA_RAO": "ALLJP_AMBATI_SIVANAGA_MALLESWARA_RAO", "PPOI_VALLURU_SAMRAJYAM": "PPOI_VALLURU_SAMRAJYAM", "NDDHP_KOKKIRIGADDA_SYAM_BABU": "NDDHP_KOKKIRIGADDA_SYAM_BABU", "IND_78_KAMALA": "IND_78_KAMALA", "IPBP_POKALA_RAJU": "IPBP_POKALA_RAJU", "YSRCP_VELAM_PALLI_SRINIVASA_RAO": "YSRCP_VELAM_PALLI_SRINIVASA_RAO", "TDP_SHABANA_MUSARAT_KHATOON": "TDP_SHABANA_MUSARAT_KHATOON", "JNP_POTHINA_VENKATA_MAHESH": "JNP_POTHINA_VENKATA_MAHESH", "IND_79_KORAADA_VIJAYA_KUMAR": "IND_79_KORAADA_VIJAYA_KUMAR", "BJP_PIYUSH_P_DESAI": "BJP_PIYUSH_P_DESAI", "INC_MATTA_JOB_RATNA_KUMAR": "INC_MATTA_JOB_RATNA_KUMAR", "IND_79_RATNAVATH_KISHORE_KUMAR": "IND_79_RATNAVATH_KISHORE_KUMAR", "IND_79_TALLURU_VENKATA_KRISHNA_RAO": "IND_79_TALLURU_VENKATA_KRISHNA_RAO", "PPOI_PONDUGULA_VENKATA_REDDY": "PPOI_PONDUGULA_VENKATA_REDDY", "NRCP_ABDUL_RAWOOF": "NRCP_ABDUL_RAWOOF", "IND_79_SRINIVAS_KONUMU": "IND_79_SRINIVAS_KONUMU", "IND_79_PRASANNA_DARLING": "IND_79_PRASANNA_DARLING", "IND_79_SHAIK_SHABASHI": "IND_79_SHAIK_SHABASHI", "IUML_SHAIK_ABDUL_KAREEM": "IUML_SHAIK_ABDUL_KAREEM", "IND_79_MOHAMMAD_RAFEEQ_UR_RAHMAN": "IND_79_MOHAMMAD_RAFEEQ_UR_RAHMAN", "IND_79_ARUGOLANU_ABRAHAM": "IND_79_ARUGOLANU_ABRAHAM", "IPBP_GUDAVALLI_MERY_RANI": "IPBP_GUDAVALLI_MERY_RANI", "ANC_KHIZRA_BEGUM": "ANC_KHIZRA_BEGUM", "JAJGP_KOPPOLU_VIJAYA_KUMAR": "JAJGP_KOPPOLU_VIJAYA_KUMAR", "AIFB_NAGENDLA_DEVA_SAHAYAM": "AIFB_NAGENDLA_DEVA_SAHAYAM", "IND_79_CHALUMURI_PRABHAKARA_RAO": "IND_79_CHALUMURI_PRABHAKARA_RAO", "IND_79_SARAGADA_VENKATESWARA_REDDY": "IND_79_SARAGADA_VENKATESWARA_REDDY", "YSRCP_MALLADI_VISHNU": "YSRCP_MALLADI_VISHNU", "TDP_BONDA_UMAMAHESWARA_RAO": "TDP_BONDA_UMAMAHESWARA_RAO", "CPM_CHIGURUPATI_BABURAO": "CPM_CHIGURUPATI_BABURAO", "BJP_SREE_SATYA_MURTHY_VAMARAJU": "BJP_SREE_SATYA_MURTHY_VAMARAJU", "INC_GURUNADHAM_VALIBOYINA": "INC_GURUNADHAM_VALIBOYINA", "IND_80_MALLADI_VISHNU_VARDHAN_VISHNU": "IND_80_MALLADI_VISHNU_VARDHAN_VISHNU", "JAJGP_KAMBHAMPATI_NARASIMHAM": "JAJGP_KAMBHAMPATI_NARASIMHAM", "IND_80_PEDAPATI_CHANDRA_SEKHAR": "IND_80_PEDAPATI_CHANDRA_SEKHAR", "PPOI_DILLI_KANAKA_DURGA": "PPOI_DILLI_KANAKA_DURGA", "NDDHP_CHINTHALACHERUVU_HEMALATHA": "NDDHP_CHINTHALACHERUVU_HEMALATHA", "IND_80_PEDDI_SRINIVASA_RAO": "IND_80_PEDDI_SRINIVASA_RAO", "MPP_KOLLIPARA_NAVIN_KUMAR": "MPP_KOLLIPARA_NAVIN_KUMAR", "IUML_SHAIK_SADDAM_HUSSAIN": "IUML_SHAIK_SADDAM_HUSSAIN", "IND_80_SUSARLA_VENKATA_PRASAD_RAVI_TEJA": "IND_80_SUSARLA_VENKATA_PRASAD_RAVI_TEJA", "IND_80_GONDESI_UMAMAHESWARA_REDDY": "IND_80_GONDESI_UMAMAHESWARA_REDDY", "JNVP_D_S_N_V_PRASAD_BABU": "JNVP_D_S_N_V_PRASAD_BABU", "VMRMP_A_V_V_K_VYSHALI": "VMRMP_A_V_V_K_VYSHALI", "TDP_GADDE_RAMA_MOHAN": "TDP_GADDE_RAMA_MOHAN", "YSRCP_BOPPANA_BHAVA_KUMAR": "YSRCP_BOPPANA_BHAVA_KUMAR", "JNP_BATTINA_RAMU": "JNP_BATTINA_RAMU", "BJP_NARENDRA_VANGAVEETI": "BJP_NARENDRA_VANGAVEETI", "INC_PONUGUPATI_NANCHARAYYA": "INC_PONUGUPATI_NANCHARAYYA", "VMRMP_ARZA_DILEEP_CHAITANYA": "VMRMP_ARZA_DILEEP_CHAITANYA", "IND_81_TAMMISETTY_CHAKRAVATHY": "IND_81_TAMMISETTY_CHAKRAVATHY", "MPP_JADA_SRAVAN_KUMAR": "MPP_JADA_SRAVAN_KUMAR", "PRSHP_AVINASH_SIDDELA": "PRSHP_AVINASH_SIDDELA", "PPOI_CHEKURI_PAVAN_VARMA": "PPOI_CHEKURI_PAVAN_VARMA", "NRCP_SUNDAR_RAJANIKANTH_PULAVARTHI": "NRCP_SUNDAR_RAJANIKANTH_PULAVARTHI", "IND_81_SIVA_KUMAR_B": "IND_81_SIVA_KUMAR_B", "YSRCP_VASANTHA_VENKATA_KRISHNA_PRASAD": "YSRCP_VASANTHA_VENKATA_KRISHNA_PRASAD", "TDP_UMA_MAHESWARARAO_DEVINENI": "TDP_UMA_MAHESWARARAO_DEVINENI", "JNP_AKKALA_RAMA_MOHANRAO_GANDHI": "JNP_AKKALA_RAMA_MOHANRAO_GANDHI", "INC_BORRA_KIRAN": "INC_BORRA_KIRAN", "BJP_BALA_KOTESWARARAO_NUTULAPATI": "BJP_BALA_KOTESWARARAO_NUTULAPATI", "IND_82_VENKATA_RAMARAO_GARIMELLA": "IND_82_VENKATA_RAMARAO_GARIMELLA", "IND_82_VALLABHANENI_NAGA_PAVAN_KUMAR_NANI": "IND_82_VALLABHANENI_NAGA_PAVAN_KUMAR_NANI", "IND_82_RAYALA_NARASIMHA_RAO": "IND_82_RAYALA_NARASIMHA_RAO", "IND_82_SHAREEF_SHAIK": "IND_82_SHAREEF_SHAIK", "IND_82_MAGANTI_VENKATA_RAMA_RAO": "IND_82_MAGANTI_VENKATA_RAMA_RAO", "PRSHP_VENKATA_KRISHNA_RAO": "PRSHP_VENKATA_KRISHNA_RAO", "IND_82_MANDAVA_SUBBARAO": "IND_82_MANDAVA_SUBBARAO", "IPBP_ERRAGUNTA_RAJA_RAO": "IPBP_ERRAGUNTA_RAJA_RAO", "PPOI_NAGARAJU_GUDIWADA": "PPOI_NAGARAJU_GUDIWADA", "IND_82_PRATHI_SAI_DASARADHI": "IND_82_PRATHI_SAI_DASARADHI", "IND_82_KOLLI_SAIDA_RAO": "IND_82_KOLLI_SAIDA_RAO", "IND_82_KRISHNA_PRASAD_PONNAGANTI": "IND_82_KRISHNA_PRASAD_PONNAGANTI", "RPI_A_PERAM_SIVA_NAGESWARARAO": "RPI_A_PERAM_SIVA_NAGESWARARAO", "YSRCP_MONDITOKA_JAGAN_MOHANA_RAO": "YSRCP_MONDITOKA_JAGAN_MOHANA_RAO", "TDP_TANGIRALA_SOWMYA": "TDP_TANGIRALA_SOWMYA", "BSP_BATCHALAKOOR_PUSHPA_RAJU": "BSP_BATCHALAKOOR_PUSHPA_RAJU", "INC_VELPULA_PARAMESWARARAO": "INC_VELPULA_PARAMESWARARAO", "BJP_JANGAM_SUNIL_RAJU": "BJP_JANGAM_SUNIL_RAJU", "IPBP_DONTAMALA_NAYANA_BABU": "IPBP_DONTAMALA_NAYANA_BABU", "IND_83_BONDALA_RAMA_KRISHNA": "IND_83_BONDALA_RAMA_KRISHNA", "IND_83_TANGIRALA_SHAILAJA": "IND_83_TANGIRALA_SHAILAJA", "PPOI_KUNDETI_MANGAMMA": "PPOI_KUNDETI_MANGAMMA", "YSRCP_UDAYABHANU_SAMINENI": "YSRCP_UDAYABHANU_SAMINENI", "TDP_RAJAGOPAL_SREERAM": "TDP_RAJAGOPAL_SREERAM", "JNP_VENKATA_RAMANA_KUMAR_DHARANIKOTA": "JNP_VENKATA_RAMANA_KUMAR_DHARANIKOTA", "INC_APPARAO_KARNATI": "INC_APPARAO_KARNATI", "BJP_A_P_SRIKANTH": "BJP_A_P_SRIKANTH", "IND_84_KASUKURTHI_DASARADHA_RAMARAO": "IND_84_KASUKURTHI_DASARADHA_RAMARAO", "IND_84_RAMAKRISHNA_SRIRAM": "IND_84_RAMAKRISHNA_SRIRAM", "IND_84_SAMINENI_UDAY_MADHAV": "IND_84_SAMINENI_UDAY_MADHAV", "IND_84_JAMA_ANANDARAO": "IND_84_JAMA_ANANDARAO", "IND_84_MUPARTHI_PHANI_CHAITANYA": "IND_84_MUPARTHI_PHANI_CHAITANYA", "YSRCP_NAMBURU_SANKARA_RAO": "YSRCP_NAMBURU_SANKARA_RAO", "TDP_KOMMALAPATI_SRIDHAR": "TDP_KOMMALAPATI_SRIDHAR", "JNP_PUTTI_SAMRAJYAM": "JNP_PUTTI_SAMRAJYAM", "INC_PAMIDI_NAGESWARA_RAO": "INC_PAMIDI_NAGESWARA_RAO", "BJP_GANDHAM_KOTESWARA_RAO": "BJP_GANDHAM_KOTESWARA_RAO", "IND_85_NAMBURU_KALYAN_CHAKRAVARTHI": "IND_85_NAMBURU_KALYAN_CHAKRAVARTHI", "SAPRP_POTHURAJU_KATAMRAJU": "SAPRP_POTHURAJU_KATAMRAJU", "PPOI_GANTA_VENKATESWARLU": "PPOI_GANTA_VENKATESWARLU", "IND_85_KANCHETI_SAI_BABU": "IND_85_KANCHETI_SAI_BABU", "MPP_CHINTHAPALLI_SRIDHAR": "MPP_CHINTHAPALLI_SRIDHAR", "NRCP_CHILAKA_RATNAM": "NRCP_CHILAKA_RATNAM", "YSRCP_VUNDAVALLI_SRIDEVI": "YSRCP_VUNDAVALLI_SRIDEVI", "TDP_TENALI_SRAVAN_KUMAR": "TDP_TENALI_SRAVAN_KUMAR", "BSP_NEELAM_RAVI_KIRAN": "BSP_NEELAM_RAVI_KIRAN", "INC_CHILAKA_VIJAY_KUMAR": "INC_CHILAKA_VIJAY_KUMAR", "BJP_ANANDA_BABU_SRUNGARAPATI": "BJP_ANANDA_BABU_SRUNGARAPATI", "IND_86_KORABANDI_VENKAIAH": "IND_86_KORABANDI_VENKAIAH", "IPBP_K_EMMANUEL": "IPBP_K_EMMANUEL", "IND_86_SARVA_SRINIVASARAO": "IND_86_SARVA_SRINIVASARAO", "MPP_BOKKA_SANGEETHA_RAO": "MPP_BOKKA_SANGEETHA_RAO", "PPOI_THALLURI_NAGARAJU": "PPOI_THALLURI_NAGARAJU", "AINPP_PILLI_BABURAO": "AINPP_PILLI_BABURAO", "YSRCP_ALLA_RAMA_KRISHNA_REDDY_RK": "YSRCP_ALLA_RAMA_KRISHNA_REDDY_RK", "TDP_NARA_LOKESH": "TDP_NARA_LOKESH", "CPI_MUPPALLA_NAGESWARA_RAO": "CPI_MUPPALLA_NAGESWARA_RAO", "INC_SHAIK_SALEEM": "INC_SHAIK_SALEEM", "BJP_JAGGARAPU_RAMOHAN_RAO": "BJP_JAGGARAPU_RAMOHAN_RAO", "IUML_SAIRA_BANU": "IUML_SAIRA_BANU", "IND_87_VIDELA_SAI_SRINIVAS": "IND_87_VIDELA_SAI_SRINIVAS", "IND_87_ALLA_RADHA_DEVI": "IND_87_ALLA_RADHA_DEVI", "AIP_SURABOINA_MURALI_KRISHNA": "AIP_SURABOINA_MURALI_KRISHNA", "ILP_AP_VINAY_KISHORE_MERIGALA": "ILP_AP_VINAY_KISHORE_MERIGALA", "IND_87_VALAPARLA_KISHORE": "IND_87_VALAPARLA_KISHORE", "PRSHP_SHAIK_SALEEM": "PRSHP_SHAIK_SALEEM", "IND_87_AKKISETTI_SRI_KRISHNA": "IND_87_AKKISETTI_SRI_KRISHNA", "IND_87_SHAIK_RAHEEM": "IND_87_SHAIK_RAHEEM", "IND_87_KAMMELA_SURI_BABU": "IND_87_KAMMELA_SURI_BABU", "PPOI_DEEPALA_SAMBHASHIVA_RAO": "PPOI_DEEPALA_SAMBHASHIVA_RAO", "NRCP_JALEEL_SHAIK": "NRCP_JALEEL_SHAIK", "NPT_G_PRASAD": "NPT_G_PRASAD", "SP_THOTA_SIVA_RAMA_PRASAD": "SP_THOTA_SIVA_RAMA_PRASAD", "CPI_ML_L_LOKAM_SESHA_SIVA_BHASKARA_RAO": "CPI_ML_L_LOKAM_SESHA_SIVA_BHASKARA_RAO", "NAVAP_VELALLA_SAI_SUBRAMANYAM": "NAVAP_VELALLA_SAI_SUBRAMANYAM", "IND_87_TARIQ_SHAIK": "IND_87_TARIQ_SHAIK", "IND_87_KARUMANCHI_RAMARAO": "IND_87_KARUMANCHI_RAMARAO", "NVSP_BABU_RAO_ITTA": "NVSP_BABU_RAO_ITTA", "IND_87_NAIDU_NAGARAJU": "IND_87_NAIDU_NAGARAJU", "IND_87_TAMANNA_SIMHADRI": "IND_87_TAMANNA_SIMHADRI", "IND_87_RAVURI_KISHORE_BABU_RK": "IND_87_RAVURI_KISHORE_BABU_RK", "IND_87_NANDIPALLI_SRINIVASA_RAO": "IND_87_NANDIPALLI_SRINIVASA_RAO", "IND_87_KASANI_SUDHAKAR_BABU": "IND_87_KASANI_SUDHAKAR_BABU", "JHUP_MACHIRAJU_BHEEMA_SANKARA_CHAITANYA": "JHUP_MACHIRAJU_BHEEMA_SANKARA_CHAITANYA", "IND_87_KOSANAM_SRINIVASA_RAO": "IND_87_KOSANAM_SRINIVASA_RAO", "IND_87_THONDAMALLU_VIJAYA_BHASKAR": "IND_87_THONDAMALLU_VIJAYA_BHASKAR", "YSRCP_KILARI_VENKATA_ROSHAIAH": "YSRCP_KILARI_VENKATA_ROSHAIAH", "TDP_DHULIPALLA_NARENDRA_KUMAR": "TDP_DHULIPALLA_NARENDRA_KUMAR", "JNP_BONI_PARVATHI_NAIDU": "JNP_BONI_PARVATHI_NAIDU", "INC_JAKKA_NAGA_SRINIVASA_VARA_PRASAD": "INC_JAKKA_NAGA_SRINIVASA_VARA_PRASAD", "BJP_CHEEDEPUDI_BALA_VIJAYA_BHASKARAA_REDDY": "BJP_CHEEDEPUDI_BALA_VIJAYA_BHASKARAA_REDDY", "DABAP_BURRA_NARESH_KUMAR": "DABAP_BURRA_NARESH_KUMAR", "IND_88_TIYYAGURA_LINGA_REDDY": "IND_88_TIYYAGURA_LINGA_REDDY", "ILP_AP_MODDU_SAMBASIVARAO": "ILP_AP_MODDU_SAMBASIVARAO", "IND_88_DASARI_VENKATESWARLU": "IND_88_DASARI_VENKATESWARLU", "IND_88_JINNI_SAI_BABU": "IND_88_JINNI_SAI_BABU", "PPOI_YENUMULA_SIVA_NAGESWARARAO": "PPOI_YENUMULA_SIVA_NAGESWARARAO", "YSRCP_MERUGU_NAGARJUNA": "YSRCP_MERUGU_NAGARJUNA", "TDP_ANANDA_BABU_NAKKA": "TDP_ANANDA_BABU_NAKKA", "JNP_APPIKATLA_BHARAT_BHUSHAN": "JNP_APPIKATLA_BHARAT_BHUSHAN", "INC_JALADI_SOBHAN_KUMAR": "INC_JALADI_SOBHAN_KUMAR", "BJP_DARSANAPU_SRINIVASA_RAO": "BJP_DARSANAPU_SRINIVASA_RAO", "IND_89_MANDE_PITCHAIAH": "IND_89_MANDE_PITCHAIAH", "ILP_AP_KOTARI_RANI": "ILP_AP_KOTARI_RANI", "PPOI_KAMALAKARA_RAO_GATTUPALLI": "PPOI_KAMALAKARA_RAO_GATTUPALLI", "IND_89_TULLIBILLI_ANIL_KUMAR": "IND_89_TULLIBILLI_ANIL_KUMAR", "NRCP_SAILAJA_BAKKA": "NRCP_SAILAJA_BAKKA", "TDP_ANAGANI_SATYA_PRASAD": "TDP_ANAGANI_SATYA_PRASAD", "YSRCP_VENKATA_RAMANA_RAO_MOPIDEVI": "YSRCP_VENKATA_RAMANA_RAO_MOPIDEVI", "JNP_KAMATHAM_SAMBASIVARAO": "JNP_KAMATHAM_SAMBASIVARAO", "INC_MOPIDEVI_SRINIVASARAO": "INC_MOPIDEVI_SRINIVASARAO", "BJP_HARSHA_VARDHAN_NAGISETTI": "BJP_HARSHA_VARDHAN_NAGISETTI", "IND_90_KOPANATHI_SRINIVASARAO": "IND_90_KOPANATHI_SRINIVASARAO", "IND_90_BODDU_NAGESWARARAO": "IND_90_BODDU_NAGESWARARAO", "IND_90_MEDIKONDA_RATNABABU": "IND_90_MEDIKONDA_RATNABABU", "IPBP_MERUGUPALA_SADASIVARAO": "IPBP_MERUGUPALA_SADASIVARAO", "ILP_AP_PARRE_KOTAIAH": "ILP_AP_PARRE_KOTAIAH", "NRCP_KONDETI_VENKATESWARA_RAO": "NRCP_KONDETI_VENKATESWARA_RAO", "IND_90_CHERUKURI_JAYAPAL": "IND_90_CHERUKURI_JAYAPAL", "IND_90_PADYALA_MANIKYARAO": "IND_90_PADYALA_MANIKYARAO", "PPOI_BELLAMKONDA_INDIRAMMA": "PPOI_BELLAMKONDA_INDIRAMMA", "RPI_A_MEKA_VENKATESWARA_RAO": "RPI_A_MEKA_VENKATESWARA_RAO", "YSRCP_ANNABATHUNI_SIVA_KUMAR": "YSRCP_ANNABATHUNI_SIVA_KUMAR", "TDP_ALAPATI_RAJENDRA_PRASAD": "TDP_ALAPATI_RAJENDRA_PRASAD", "JNP_NADENDLA_MANOHAR": "JNP_NADENDLA_MANOHAR", "INC_DR_CHANDU_SAMBASIVUDU": "INC_DR_CHANDU_SAMBASIVUDU", "BJP_RAMAKRISHNA_PATIBANDLA": "BJP_RAMAKRISHNA_PATIBANDLA", "PPOI_BOMMU_MANGAMMA": "PPOI_BOMMU_MANGAMMA", "CPI_ML_L_PILLI_RANA_PRATHAP": "CPI_ML_L_PILLI_RANA_PRATHAP", "ALPP_THOTA_SADASIVA_RAO": "ALPP_THOTA_SADASIVA_RAO", "VCK_KARUMANCHI_RAVI_KUMAR": "VCK_KARUMANCHI_RAVI_KUMAR", "IND_91_SK_TAYARUNNISA": "IND_91_SK_TAYARUNNISA", "NAVAP_S_B_M_VENKATESWARARAO": "NAVAP_S_B_M_VENKATESWARARAO", "IND_91_BH_SURESH_REDDY": "IND_91_BH_SURESH_REDDY", "NRCP_SYED_KHAMURUNNISSA": "NRCP_SYED_KHAMURUNNISSA", "YSRCP_KONA_RAGHUPATHI": "YSRCP_KONA_RAGHUPATHI", "TDP_ANNAM_SATISH_PRABHAKAR": "TDP_ANNAM_SATISH_PRABHAKAR", "JNP_LAKSHMI_NARASIMHA_IKKURTHI": "JNP_LAKSHMI_NARASIMHA_IKKURTHI", "INC_MOHAMMAD_MOHIDDIN_BAIG": "INC_MOHAMMAD_MOHIDDIN_BAIG", "BJP_SHAIK_KARIMULLA": "BJP_SHAIK_KARIMULLA", "IND_92_MALLISETTY_PRASANNALATHA": "IND_92_MALLISETTY_PRASANNALATHA", "IND_92_VEMAVARAPU_VIJAYA_KUMAR": "IND_92_VEMAVARAPU_VIJAYA_KUMAR", "IND_92_KATTA_RUBENU": "IND_92_KATTA_RUBENU", "IND_92_BHARGAVA_REDDY_DOMA_BHARGAVA_INDIAN": "IND_92_BHARGAVA_REDDY_DOMA_BHARGAVA_INDIAN", "IND_92_V_L_SRINIVASA_REDDY": "IND_92_V_L_SRINIVASA_REDDY", "IND_92_PULUGU_MADHU_SUDHANA_REDDY": "IND_92_PULUGU_MADHU_SUDHANA_REDDY", "IND_92_PULUGU_SUSEELA": "IND_92_PULUGU_SUSEELA", "PRSHP_BADUGU_VIJAYA_BHARATH": "PRSHP_BADUGU_VIJAYA_BHARATH", "HMRD_CHUKKA_WALTER": "HMRD_CHUKKA_WALTER", "ILP_AP_YENUMALA_BHASKARARAO": "ILP_AP_YENUMALA_BHASKARARAO", "IND_92_N_PRAKASARAO": "IND_92_N_PRAKASARAO", "PPOI_MARISETTY_VENKATASIVA_NAGESWARARAO": "PPOI_MARISETTY_VENKATASIVA_NAGESWARARAO", "AINPP_BABURAO_TUMATI": "AINPP_BABURAO_TUMATI", "IND_92_V_THULASI_RAO": "IND_92_V_THULASI_RAO", "YSRCP_MEKATHOTI_SUCHARITHA": "YSRCP_MEKATHOTI_SUCHARITHA", "TDP_DOKKA_MANIKYA_VARAPRASADA_RAO": "TDP_DOKKA_MANIKYA_VARAPRASADA_RAO", "JNP_RAVELA_KISHORE_BABU": "JNP_RAVELA_KISHORE_BABU", "INC_KORIVI_VINAY_KUMAR": "INC_KORIVI_VINAY_KUMAR", "BJP_DR_DARA_AMBEDKAR": "BJP_DR_DARA_AMBEDKAR", "CPIM_THIPPABATHINI_GOVINDU": "CPIM_THIPPABATHINI_GOVINDU", "PRSHP_ANUSHA_MYLA": "PRSHP_ANUSHA_MYLA", "ILP_AP_DODDA_NAGAMALLI_RAJU": "ILP_AP_DODDA_NAGAMALLI_RAJU", "NAVAP_MERUGA_VIJAYA_RAJU": "NAVAP_MERUGA_VIJAYA_RAJU", "IND_93_THANGIRALA_IRMIYA": "IND_93_THANGIRALA_IRMIYA", "IND_93_MARKU_BOUJANKU": "IND_93_MARKU_BOUJANKU", "PPOI_YDDU_KANTHARAO": "PPOI_YDDU_KANTHARAO", "IND_93_NAGA_PAPARAO_KOMMU": "IND_93_NAGA_PAPARAO_KOMMU", "TDP_MADDALI_GIRIDHARA_RAO": "TDP_MADDALI_GIRIDHARA_RAO", "YSRCP_CHANDRAGIRI_YESURATNAM": "YSRCP_CHANDRAGIRI_YESURATNAM", "JNP_DR_THOTA_CHANDRA_SHEKHAR": "JNP_DR_THOTA_CHANDRA_SHEKHAR", "BJP_MADHAVI_LATHA_PASUPULETI": "BJP_MADHAVI_LATHA_PASUPULETI", "INC_ROHIT_SAVARAM": "INC_ROHIT_SAVARAM", "VCK_SADHANALA_NAGESWARA_RAO": "VCK_SADHANALA_NAGESWARA_RAO", "PPOI_GUDUGUNTLA_RADHA": "PPOI_GUDUGUNTLA_RADHA", "IND_94_B_ANIL_KUMAR": "IND_94_B_ANIL_KUMAR", "IND_94_DR_T_SEVA_KUMAR_S_H_O_SEVA_KUMAR": "IND_94_DR_T_SEVA_KUMAR_S_H_O_SEVA_KUMAR", "ILP_AP_DR_ANKAIAH_MADDU": "ILP_AP_DR_ANKAIAH_MADDU", "DABAP_KALUKURI_NAGARJUNA_ALIAS_CHANTI": "DABAP_KALUKURI_NAGARJUNA_ALIAS_CHANTI", "NRCP_SHAIK_SHUKUR": "NRCP_SHAIK_SHUKUR", "IND_94_ATHUKURI_KRISHNAIAH": "IND_94_ATHUKURI_KRISHNAIAH", "IND_94_K_VENKATESWARLU": "IND_94_K_VENKATESWARLU", "IND_94_AKULA_YEDUKONDALU": "IND_94_AKULA_YEDUKONDALU", "CPIM_VENIGALLA_PUSHPALATHA": "CPIM_VENIGALLA_PUSHPALATHA", "IUML_ALTAF_HUSSAIN_SHAIK": "IUML_ALTAF_HUSSAIN_SHAIK", "IND_94_SAYYAD_MEHABOOBI": "IND_94_SAYYAD_MEHABOOBI", "IND_94_INDLA_SUNNY_DEOL": "IND_94_INDLA_SUNNY_DEOL", "IND_94_SIVAJI_KANCHIBHOTLA": "IND_94_SIVAJI_KANCHIBHOTLA", "IND_94_SANGATI_SRINIVASA_REDDY": "IND_94_SANGATI_SRINIVASA_REDDY", "IND_94_TANNIRU_SURESH_BABU": "IND_94_TANNIRU_SURESH_BABU", "IND_94_RAHEEM_SK": "IND_94_RAHEEM_SK", "IND_94_BALAJI_SINGH_RAJAPUTRA": "IND_94_BALAJI_SINGH_RAJAPUTRA", "JHUP_R_TRIKOTESWARA_RAO": "JHUP_R_TRIKOTESWARA_RAO", "NAVAP_VITTALADEVUNI_GANESH_KUMAR": "NAVAP_VITTALADEVUNI_GANESH_KUMAR", "IND_94_GANGARAJU_DINAKAR": "IND_94_GANGARAJU_DINAKAR", "RPI_A_KONDRAJU_SANTHI_BHARATH": "RPI_A_KONDRAJU_SANTHI_BHARATH", "SUCI_C_M_BASAVARAJU": "SUCI_C_M_BASAVARAJU", "IND_94_SHAIK_RAFI": "IND_94_SHAIK_RAFI", "IND_94_NARASIMHA_RAO_SATTENAPALLI": "IND_94_NARASIMHA_RAO_SATTENAPALLI", "IND_94_P_N_V_PAVAN_KUMAR": "IND_94_P_N_V_PAVAN_KUMAR", "IND_94_SK_MOULALI": "IND_94_SK_MOULALI", "NPT_NALLAKA_VIJAYA_RAJU": "NPT_NALLAKA_VIJAYA_RAJU", "YSRCP_MOHAMMED_MUSTAFA_SHAIK": "YSRCP_MOHAMMED_MUSTAFA_SHAIK", "TDP_MOHAMMED_NASEER": "TDP_MOHAMMED_NASEER", "JNP_ZIA_UR_RAHMAN_SHAIK": "JNP_ZIA_UR_RAHMAN_SHAIK", "BJP_NERELLA_V_S_SURESH": "BJP_NERELLA_V_S_SURESH", "INC_JAGAN_MOHAN_REDDY_MADDIREDDY": "INC_JAGAN_MOHAN_REDDY_MADDIREDDY", "IND_95_CHENNUPALLI_RAM_BHARATH": "IND_95_CHENNUPALLI_RAM_BHARATH", "PPOI_KAJA_VENKATA_RAGHAVENDRA_SANJEEVA_RAO": "PPOI_KAJA_VENKATA_RAGHAVENDRA_SANJEEVA_RAO", "IND_95_A_V_S_CHARI": "IND_95_A_V_S_CHARI", "IND_95_NARENDRA_YEPURI": "IND_95_NARENDRA_YEPURI", "IND_95_POTHURI_HIMABINDU": "IND_95_POTHURI_HIMABINDU", "NVSP_TULASI_PRAVEEN_KUMAR": "NVSP_TULASI_PRAVEEN_KUMAR", "IUML_MOHAMMAD_RIYAZ_BASHA": "IUML_MOHAMMAD_RIYAZ_BASHA", "CPIM_PILLI_CHENNAKESAVULU": "CPIM_PILLI_CHENNAKESAVULU", "IND_95_DURREY_SHAHAWAR_SHAIK": "IND_95_DURREY_SHAHAWAR_SHAIK", "IND_95_GRANDHI_PARDHASARADHI": "IND_95_GRANDHI_PARDHASARADHI", "IND_95_SHAIK_YASEEN": "IND_95_SHAIK_YASEEN", "IND_95_SHAIK_MOHAMMAD_ARIF_HUSSAIN_KHADARI": "IND_95_SHAIK_MOHAMMAD_ARIF_HUSSAIN_KHADARI", "IND_95_RUBENU_SAGGELA": "IND_95_RUBENU_SAGGELA", "ILP_AP_RAYAPUDI_JEEVAN_PERCIS": "ILP_AP_RAYAPUDI_JEEVAN_PERCIS", "IND_95_HAROON_RASHEED_SHAIK": "IND_95_HAROON_RASHEED_SHAIK", "NRCP_SYED_SAIDA": "NRCP_SYED_SAIDA", "IND_95_SHAIK_KHAJAVALI": "IND_95_SHAIK_KHAJAVALI", "IND_95_KROSURI_RAMU": "IND_95_KROSURI_RAMU", "RPI_A_VISHNUMOLAKALA_VENKATESWARA_RAO": "RPI_A_VISHNUMOLAKALA_VENKATESWARA_RAO", "IND_95_SYED_NAZEER": "IND_95_SYED_NAZEER", "IND_95_MURUGUDU_SURYA_NARAYANA": "IND_95_MURUGUDU_SURYA_NARAYANA", "NAVAP_SHAIK_KHADAR_BI": "NAVAP_SHAIK_KHADAR_BI", "YSRCP_RAJINI_VIDADALA": "YSRCP_RAJINI_VIDADALA", "TDP_PRATHIPATI_PULLARAO": "TDP_PRATHIPATI_PULLARAO", "JNP_NAGESWARA_RAO_GADE": "JNP_NAGESWARA_RAO_GADE", "INC_MADDULA_RADHA_KRISHNA": "INC_MADDULA_RADHA_KRISHNA", "BJP_ANNAM_SREENIVASARAO": "BJP_ANNAM_SREENIVASARAO", "AHNP_ABDUL_MUNAPH_SHEK": "AHNP_ABDUL_MUNAPH_SHEK", "IND_96_VALERU_ASHOK_KUMAR": "IND_96_VALERU_ASHOK_KUMAR", "IND_96_NAGARAJU_VARJABOYINA_NAGARAJU_MUDIRAJU_VARJABOYINA": "IND_96_NAGARAJU_VARJABOYINA_NAGARAJU_MUDIRAJU_VARJABOYINA", "IND_96_GUNJI_VENKATESWARLU": "IND_96_GUNJI_VENKATESWARLU", "IND_96_VEERAIAH_MANDA": "IND_96_VEERAIAH_MANDA", "IND_96_SIVA_RAMA_KRISHNA_THOTA": "IND_96_SIVA_RAMA_KRISHNA_THOTA", "IND_96_BAHUJANKU_RAJESH": "IND_96_BAHUJANKU_RAJESH", "IND_96_YEDUKONDALU_JANGA": "IND_96_YEDUKONDALU_JANGA", "RPI_A_MEKAPOTHULA_SANKAR_KUMAR": "RPI_A_MEKAPOTHULA_SANKAR_KUMAR", "IND_96_KATTA_KIRAN_KUMAR": "IND_96_KATTA_KIRAN_KUMAR", "PPOI_RATHNAKUMARI_THANNEERU": "PPOI_RATHNAKUMARI_THANNEERU", "IND_96_THANUBODDI_SUNDARA_RAMIREDDY": "IND_96_THANUBODDI_SUNDARA_RAMIREDDY", "NAVAP_SUBRAMANYAM_RAVU": "NAVAP_SUBRAMANYAM_RAVU", "IND_96_KOCHERLA_SRINIVASA_RAO": "IND_96_KOCHERLA_SRINIVASA_RAO", "YSRCP_GOPIREDDY_SRINIVASAREDDY": "YSRCP_GOPIREDDY_SRINIVASAREDDY", "TDP_ARAVINDA_BABU_CHADALAVADA": "TDP_ARAVINDA_BABU_CHADALAVADA", "JNP_JILANI_SYED": "JNP_JILANI_SYED", "INC_GARNEPUDI_ALEXANDER_SUDHAKAR": "INC_GARNEPUDI_ALEXANDER_SUDHAKAR", "BJP_CHIRUMAMILLA_RAMU": "BJP_CHIRUMAMILLA_RAMU", "IND_97_B_V_H_L_S_N_MURTHY": "IND_97_B_V_H_L_S_N_MURTHY", "IND_97_SRINIVASARAO_CHINDUKURI": "IND_97_SRINIVASARAO_CHINDUKURI", "IND_97_MOHAMMAD_MANJUR_SHAIK": "IND_97_MOHAMMAD_MANJUR_SHAIK", "IPBP_MATTA_PRASAD": "IPBP_MATTA_PRASAD", "PPOI_KAPULAPALLI_SATYANARAYANA_REDDY": "PPOI_KAPULAPALLI_SATYANARAYANA_REDDY", "NAVAP_GODA_RAMESH_KUMAR": "NAVAP_GODA_RAMESH_KUMAR", "IND_97_BUDALA_BABURAO": "IND_97_BUDALA_BABURAO", "IUML_SK_MOULALI": "IUML_SK_MOULALI", "IND_97_CHALLA_SUBBARAO": "IND_97_CHALLA_SUBBARAO", "IND_97_PULIMI_VENKATA_RAMI_REDDY": "IND_97_PULIMI_VENKATA_RAMI_REDDY", "YSRCP_AMBATI_RAMBABU": "YSRCP_AMBATI_RAMBABU", "TDP_KODELA_SIVA_PRASADA_RAO": "TDP_KODELA_SIVA_PRASADA_RAO", "JNP_YARRAM_VENKATESWARA_REDDY": "JNP_YARRAM_VENKATESWARA_REDDY", "INC_CHUKKA_CHANDRAPAUL": "INC_CHUKKA_CHANDRAPAUL", "BJP_KRISHNAM_RAJU_MADDULA_RAJA_YADAV": "BJP_KRISHNAM_RAJU_MADDULA_RAJA_YADAV", "IND_98_METTU_VENKATESWARA_REDDY": "IND_98_METTU_VENKATESWARA_REDDY", "AIFB_MADHAVARAO_PUTTI": "AIFB_MADHAVARAO_PUTTI", "IND_98_RAM_BABU_GADDAM": "IND_98_RAM_BABU_GADDAM", "IND_98_SAHAIK_DARIYAVALI": "IND_98_SAHAIK_DARIYAVALI", "PPOI_RANGISETTI_NAGESWARA_RAO": "PPOI_RANGISETTI_NAGESWARA_RAO", "IND_98_KUNDURU_SAMBI_REDDY": "IND_98_KUNDURU_SAMBI_REDDY", "IND_98_PILLUTLA_KRISHNA_MURTHY": "IND_98_PILLUTLA_KRISHNA_MURTHY", "IND_98_GARIKAPATI_RAVI_KUMAR_MRPS_RAVIKUMAR": "IND_98_GARIKAPATI_RAVI_KUMAR_MRPS_RAVIKUMAR", "IUML_SHAIK_SIRAJ_AHAMED": "IUML_SHAIK_SIRAJ_AHAMED", "IND_98_MADALA_SAGAR": "IND_98_MADALA_SAGAR", "YSRCP_BOLLA_BRAHMA_NAIDU": "YSRCP_BOLLA_BRAHMA_NAIDU", "TDP_G_V_AANZANEYULU": "TDP_G_V_AANZANEYULU", "JNP_CHENNA_SRINIVASARAO": "JNP_CHENNA_SRINIVASARAO", "INC_VIJAY_KUMAR_ATLURI": "INC_VIJAY_KUMAR_ATLURI", "BJP_NALABOTHU_VENKATA_RAO": "BJP_NALABOTHU_VENKATA_RAO", "IND_99_MANDA_VENKATRAO": "IND_99_MANDA_VENKATRAO", "IND_99_PASAM_NAGA_MALLESWARARAO": "IND_99_PASAM_NAGA_MALLESWARARAO", "PPOI_GADDAM_RAMANA": "PPOI_GADDAM_RAMANA", "IND_99_GANGINENI_BRAHMANAIDU": "IND_99_GANGINENI_BRAHMANAIDU", "SP_JANAPATI_PARAMESWARARAO": "SP_JANAPATI_PARAMESWARARAO", "IND_99_USTALA_CHINA_KASAIAH": "IND_99_USTALA_CHINA_KASAIAH", "NRCP_MEDIKONDA_LAKSHMI_KANTHARAO": "NRCP_MEDIKONDA_LAKSHMI_KANTHARAO", "NAVAP_VENKATA_RAVI_KUMAR_BATCHU_R_K_NAIDU": "NAVAP_VENKATA_RAVI_KUMAR_BATCHU_R_K_NAIDU", "YSRCP_KASU_MAHESH_REDDY": "YSRCP_KASU_MAHESH_REDDY", "TDP_YARAPATHINENI_SRINIVASA_RAO": "TDP_YARAPATHINENI_SRINIVASA_RAO", "JNP_CHINTALAPUDI_SRINIVASA_RAO": "JNP_CHINTALAPUDI_SRINIVASA_RAO", "INC_TIYYAGURA_YALAMANDA_REDDY": "INC_TIYYAGURA_YALAMANDA_REDDY", "BJP_PULLAIAH_JINUGU": "BJP_PULLAIAH_JINUGU", "PPOI_ANNAPAREDDY_SRINIVASA_REDDY": "PPOI_ANNAPAREDDY_SRINIVASA_REDDY", "IND_100_SRINIVASARAO_KOKKERA": "IND_100_SRINIVASARAO_KOKKERA", "IND_100_KOTHA_S_V_U_MAHESH": "IND_100_KOTHA_S_V_U_MAHESH", "NNKP_RAMANJANEYULU_PARIMI": "NNKP_RAMANJANEYULU_PARIMI", "IND_100_POTLA_NARASIMHARAO": "IND_100_POTLA_NARASIMHARAO", "IND_100_CHIDELLA_VENKATA_RAVI_BABU": "IND_100_CHIDELLA_VENKATA_RAVI_BABU", "NRCP_SHAIK_MAHABOOB_SUBHANI": "NRCP_SHAIK_MAHABOOB_SUBHANI", "IUML_SHAIK_NASAR_SAIDA": "IUML_SHAIK_NASAR_SAIDA", "IND_100_KUNDA_EDUKONDALU": "IND_100_KUNDA_EDUKONDALU", "YSRCP_RAMAKRISHNAREDDY_PINNELLI": "YSRCP_RAMAKRISHNAREDDY_PINNELLI", "TDP_ANJI_REDDY_ANNAPUREDDY": "TDP_ANJI_REDDY_ANNAPUREDDY", "JNP_MULLA_SRINIVASA_RAO": "JNP_MULLA_SRINIVASA_RAO", "INC_YARAMALA_RAMACHANDRAREDDY": "INC_YARAMALA_RAMACHANDRAREDDY", "BJP_AMARA_SAIDARAO_KARNA": "BJP_AMARA_SAIDARAO_KARNA", "PPOI_GARINE_RAJYALAKSHMI": "PPOI_GARINE_RAJYALAKSHMI", "IND_101_MOGILI_ADDAIAH": "IND_101_MOGILI_ADDAIAH", "IND_101_BOYA_SRINIVASAREDDY": "IND_101_BOYA_SRINIVASAREDDY", "IND_101_MADDIGAPU_VENKATARAMI_REDDY": "IND_101_MADDIGAPU_VENKATARAMI_REDDY", "IND_101_POKALA_VENKATESWARLU": "IND_101_POKALA_VENKATESWARLU", "IND_101_PANGULURI_ANJAIAH": "IND_101_PANGULURI_ANJAIAH", "IND_101_ANNAPUREDDY_ANJIREDDY": "IND_101_ANNAPUREDDY_ANJIREDDY", "IND_101_GOPALUNI_SRINIVASA_RAO": "IND_101_GOPALUNI_SRINIVASA_RAO", "YSRCP_AUDIMULAPU_SURESH": "YSRCP_AUDIMULAPU_SURESH", "TDP_BUDALA_AJITHA_RAO": "TDP_BUDALA_AJITHA_RAO", "JNP_GOWTHAM_RAJ_PAKANATI": "JNP_GOWTHAM_RAJ_PAKANATI", "INC_MEDABALIMI_VENKATESWARA_RAO": "INC_MEDABALIMI_VENKATESWARA_RAO", "BJP_ANGALAKURTHI_CHENNAIAH": "BJP_ANGALAKURTHI_CHENNAIAH", "IND_102_BANKA_RAJU": "IND_102_BANKA_RAJU", "IND_102_PRASADA_RAO_RACHETI": "IND_102_PRASADA_RAO_RACHETI", "IND_102_NALLURI_NAGAIAH": "IND_102_NALLURI_NAGAIAH", "NAVAP_GOTTIMUKKALA_SUJATHA": "NAVAP_GOTTIMUKKALA_SUJATHA", "IND_102_KOLA_SRINIVASULU": "IND_102_KOLA_SRINIVASULU", "NPT_BUDALA_ASEERVADAM": "NPT_BUDALA_ASEERVADAM", "YSRCP_MADDISETTY_VENUGOPAL": "YSRCP_MADDISETTY_VENUGOPAL", "TDP_KADIRI_BABU_RAO": "TDP_KADIRI_BABU_RAO", "JNP_BOTUKU_RAMESH_BABU": "JNP_BOTUKU_RAMESH_BABU", "INC_PUTLURI_KONDA_REDDY": "INC_PUTLURI_KONDA_REDDY", "IND_103_PARITALA_SURESH_RAO": "IND_103_PARITALA_SURESH_RAO", "BJP_YERUVA_LAKSHMI_NARAYANA_REDDY": "BJP_YERUVA_LAKSHMI_NARAYANA_REDDY", "IPBP_SAMUDRALA_NAIK_J": "IPBP_SAMUDRALA_NAIK_J", "YSRPP_CHOPPARA_THIRUPATHI_SWAMY": "YSRPP_CHOPPARA_THIRUPATHI_SWAMY", "TDP_YELURI_SAMBA_SIVARAO": "TDP_YELURI_SAMBA_SIVARAO", "YSRCP_DAGGUBATI_VENKATESWARA_RAO": "YSRCP_DAGGUBATI_VENKATESWARA_RAO", "BSP_PEDAPUDI_VIJAY_KUMAR": "BSP_PEDAPUDI_VIJAY_KUMAR", "INC_PONNAGANTI_JANAKI_RAMARAO": "INC_PONNAGANTI_JANAKI_RAMARAO", "IND_104_SANAM_SURESH": "IND_104_SANAM_SURESH", "BJP_CHERUKURI_RAMAYOGESWARA_RAO": "BJP_CHERUKURI_RAMAYOGESWARA_RAO", "IND_104_HITLER_RETURI": "IND_104_HITLER_RETURI", "PRSHP_DAGGUBATI_VENKATESWARLU": "PRSHP_DAGGUBATI_VENKATESWARLU", "IND_104_TADAVARTHI_SANTHI_SWAROOP": "IND_104_TADAVARTHI_SANTHI_SWAROOP", "IND_104_DUDDU_RAJEEV": "IND_104_DUDDU_RAJEEV", "IND_104_TEKKEM_ANANDABABU": "IND_104_TEKKEM_ANANDABABU", "PPOI_PRADEEP_KUMAR_ARVAPALLI": "PPOI_PRADEEP_KUMAR_ARVAPALLI", "JTSSJP_BACHINA_RAMBABU": "JTSSJP_BACHINA_RAMBABU", "MPP_YARLAGADDA_SINGARAO": "MPP_YARLAGADDA_SINGARAO", "IND_104_KONDURI_GOVINDU": "IND_104_KONDURI_GOVINDU", "TDP_GOTTIPATI_RAVIKUMAR": "TDP_GOTTIPATI_RAVIKUMAR", "YSRCP_BACHINA_CHENCHU_GARATAIAH": "YSRCP_BACHINA_CHENCHU_GARATAIAH", "JNP_KANCHARLA_SRIKRISHNA": "JNP_KANCHARLA_SRIKRISHNA", "INC_NANNURI_SITHARAMANJANEYULU": "INC_NANNURI_SITHARAMANJANEYULU", "BJP_VUNDAVALLI_KRISHNA_RAO": "BJP_VUNDAVALLI_KRISHNA_RAO", "IND_105_PARDHASARADHI_DASARI": "IND_105_PARDHASARADHI_DASARI", "IND_105_BETALA_RAGHAVENDRARAO": "IND_105_BETALA_RAGHAVENDRARAO", "IND_105_PASUPULETI_KOTISWAMY": "IND_105_PASUPULETI_KOTISWAMY", "IND_105_DUPATI_YESOBU": "IND_105_DUPATI_YESOBU", "IND_105_KONCHA_SRINIVASA_REDDY": "IND_105_KONCHA_SRINIVASA_REDDY", "TDP_KARANAM_BALARAMA_KRISHNA_MURTHY": "TDP_KARANAM_BALARAMA_KRISHNA_MURTHY", "YSRCP_AMANCHI_KRISHNA_MOHAN": "YSRCP_AMANCHI_KRISHNA_MOHAN", "BSP_KATTA_RAJ_VINAYA_KUMAR": "BSP_KATTA_RAJ_VINAYA_KUMAR", "INC_DEVARAPALLI_RANGA_RAO": "INC_DEVARAPALLI_RANGA_RAO", "BJP_MUVVALA_VENKATA_RAMANA_RAO": "BJP_MUVVALA_VENKATA_RAMANA_RAO", "IND_106_SHAIK_MAHABOOB_BASHA": "IND_106_SHAIK_MAHABOOB_BASHA", "IND_106_DANTAM_VENKATA_SUBBA_RAO": "IND_106_DANTAM_VENKATA_SUBBA_RAO", "IND_106_SURAGANI_LAKSHMI": "IND_106_SURAGANI_LAKSHMI", "IND_106_SANTHARAM_PINJALA": "IND_106_SANTHARAM_PINJALA", "PRSHP_KRISHNA_MOHANA_RAO_K": "PRSHP_KRISHNA_MOHANA_RAO_K", "PPOI_KOLLA_RATNA_KUMARI": "PPOI_KOLLA_RATNA_KUMARI", "IND_106_CHAPPIDI_PRIYATHAM": "IND_106_CHAPPIDI_PRIYATHAM", "IND_106_KASANI_RAMU": "IND_106_KASANI_RAMU", "IND_106_GAJAVALLI_SRINU": "IND_106_GAJAVALLI_SRINU", "IND_106_KRISHNAIAH_AMANCHI": "IND_106_KRISHNAIAH_AMANCHI", "YSRCP_T_J_R_SUDHAKAR_BABU": "YSRCP_T_J_R_SUDHAKAR_BABU", "TDP_VIJAY_KUMAR_B_N": "TDP_VIJAY_KUMAR_B_N", "CPM_ANJAIAH_JALA": "CPM_ANJAIAH_JALA", "INC_VEMA_SRINIVASA_RAO": "INC_VEMA_SRINIVASA_RAO", "BJP_NANNEPOGU_SUBBARAO": "BJP_NANNEPOGU_SUBBARAO", "MPP_KORISAPATI_VENKATARAO": "MPP_KORISAPATI_VENKATARAO", "IND_107_DASARI_LAKSHMI_NARAYANA": "IND_107_DASARI_LAKSHMI_NARAYANA", "IND_107_SWARNA_RAVINDRA_BABU": "IND_107_SWARNA_RAVINDRA_BABU", "IND_107_MENDEM_RAMBABU": "IND_107_MENDEM_RAMBABU", "IND_107_JAGANNADAM_KOTI_LINGAM": "IND_107_JAGANNADAM_KOTI_LINGAM", "YSRPP_DASARI_SUBBARAO": "YSRPP_DASARI_SUBBARAO", "IND_107_USURUPATI_ELIA": "IND_107_USURUPATI_ELIA", "YSRCP_BALINENI_SRINIVASA_REDDY_VASU": "YSRCP_BALINENI_SRINIVASA_REDDY_VASU", "TDP_DAMACHARLA_JANARDHANA_RAO": "TDP_DAMACHARLA_JANARDHANA_RAO", "JNP_SK_REYAZ": "JNP_SK_REYAZ", "INC_EDA_SUDHAKARA_REDDY": "INC_EDA_SUDHAKARA_REDDY", "BJP_BODDULURI_ANJANEYULU": "BJP_BODDULURI_ANJANEYULU", "PRSHP_BALINENI_SRINIVAS": "PRSHP_BALINENI_SRINIVAS", "IND_108_FIRDOUS_SHAIK": "IND_108_FIRDOUS_SHAIK", "IND_108_PERAVALI_CHANDRASEKHAR": "IND_108_PERAVALI_CHANDRASEKHAR", "IND_108_GANGADI_MALYADRI": "IND_108_GANGADI_MALYADRI", "IND_108_DHENUVAKONDA_SRINIVASA_MURTHY": "IND_108_DHENUVAKONDA_SRINIVASA_MURTHY", "IND_108_DASARI_SUNDARAM": "IND_108_DASARI_SUNDARAM", "IND_108_KANKANALA_GOPI": "IND_108_KANKANALA_GOPI", "YSRCP_MAHEEDHAR_REDDY_MANUGUNTA": "YSRCP_MAHEEDHAR_REDDY_MANUGUNTA", "TDP_POTHULA_RAMA_RAO": "TDP_POTHULA_RAMA_RAO", "JNP_PULI_MALLIKARJUNA_RAO": "JNP_PULI_MALLIKARJUNA_RAO", "INC_CHILAKAPATI_SUSHEELA": "INC_CHILAKAPATI_SUSHEELA", "BJP_CHANDRAGIRI_VENKATESWARA_RAO": "BJP_CHANDRAGIRI_VENKATESWARA_RAO", "IND_109_DANDE_SRINIVASA_MURTHY": "IND_109_DANDE_SRINIVASA_MURTHY", "RPI_A_PARRE_THIRUPATI_RAO": "RPI_A_PARRE_THIRUPATI_RAO", "IND_109_JAMEER_SHAIK": "IND_109_JAMEER_SHAIK", "IND_109_UNNAM_RADHAMMA": "IND_109_UNNAM_RADHAMMA", "IND_109_SYED_GOUSE_MOHIDDIN": "IND_109_SYED_GOUSE_MOHIDDIN", "IND_109_BEZAWADA_SESHAIAH": "IND_109_BEZAWADA_SESHAIAH", "IND_109_JANARDHANA_RAO_PULLAGURA": "IND_109_JANARDHANA_RAO_PULLAGURA", "IND_109_PARNA_SRIKANTH": "IND_109_PARNA_SRIKANTH", "IND_109_GUDIPUDI_NARASIMHA_RAO": "IND_109_GUDIPUDI_NARASIMHA_RAO", "IND_109_JAGANNADHAM_SURESH": "IND_109_JAGANNADHAM_SURESH", "PRSHP_SRIDHAR_LINGESWARA_RAO_KASUKURTHI": "PRSHP_SRIDHAR_LINGESWARA_RAO_KASUKURTHI", "IND_109_ORUGANTI_SIVA_RAMAIAH": "IND_109_ORUGANTI_SIVA_RAMAIAH", "IND_109_KOCHERLA_MALYADRI": "IND_109_KOCHERLA_MALYADRI", "PPOI_BALAKOTAIAH_MENDA": "PPOI_BALAKOTAIAH_MENDA", "IND_109_G_KARTHIK": "IND_109_G_KARTHIK", "TDP_DOCTOR_DOLA_SREE_BALA_VEERANJANEYA_SWAMY": "TDP_DOCTOR_DOLA_SREE_BALA_VEERANJANEYA_SWAMY", "YSRCP_MADASI_VENKAIAH": "YSRCP_MADASI_VENKAIAH", "BSP_KAKI_PRASAD": "BSP_KAKI_PRASAD", "INC_SRIPATHI_PRAKASAM": "INC_SRIPATHI_PRAKASAM", "IND_110_NALLAPU_VIJAYA_RAMARAJU": "IND_110_NALLAPU_VIJAYA_RAMARAJU", "BJP_KARATAPU_RAJU": "BJP_KARATAPU_RAJU", "IND_110_VENKATESWARLU_YANAMADNI": "IND_110_VENKATESWARLU_YANAMADNI", "IND_110_KONDRU_KOTAIAH": "IND_110_KONDRU_KOTAIAH", "YSRPP_ALLARI_RAMAIAH": "YSRPP_ALLARI_RAMAIAH", "IND_110_K_RAJU": "IND_110_K_RAJU", "IND_110_KOMMU_YOHANU": "IND_110_KOMMU_YOHANU", "PPOI_KOTTE_BALA_KRISHNA": "PPOI_KOTTE_BALA_KRISHNA", "YSRCP_KUNDURU_NAGARJUNA_REDDY": "YSRCP_KUNDURU_NAGARJUNA_REDDY", "TDP_KANDULA_NARAYANA_REDDY": "TDP_KANDULA_NARAYANA_REDDY", "JNP_EMMADI_KASINADH": "JNP_EMMADI_KASINADH", "INC_SHAIK_SAIDHA": "INC_SHAIK_SAIDHA", "BJP_MORRIBOYINA_CHENNAIAH": "BJP_MORRIBOYINA_CHENNAIAH", "IND_111_LAKSHMI_REDDY_YERUVA": "IND_111_LAKSHMI_REDDY_YERUVA", "PRSHP_ERUVA_NAGARJUNA_REDDY": "PRSHP_ERUVA_NAGARJUNA_REDDY", "IND_111_BARIGE_BALAIAH": "IND_111_BARIGE_BALAIAH", "SAPRP_KADIAM_RAMAIAH_YADAV": "SAPRP_KADIAM_RAMAIAH_YADAV", "IND_111_PARISINENI_VENKATESWARLU": "IND_111_PARISINENI_VENKATESWARLU", "IND_111_G_K_NAGENDRA_REDDY": "IND_111_G_K_NAGENDRA_REDDY", "IND_111_NAGASUNDARI_EMMADI": "IND_111_NAGASUNDARI_EMMADI", "NVSP_SANTHA_KUMAR_MALAPROLU": "NVSP_SANTHA_KUMAR_MALAPROLU", "IND_111_ORSU_ALLURAIAH_SWAMI": "IND_111_ORSU_ALLURAIAH_SWAMI", "PPOI_SURESH_KUMAR_NATHA": "PPOI_SURESH_KUMAR_NATHA", "YSRCP_ANNA_RAMBABU": "YSRCP_ANNA_RAMBABU", "TDP_ASHOK_REDDY_MUTHUMULA": "TDP_ASHOK_REDDY_MUTHUMULA", "JNP_BYRABOINA_CHANDRA_SEKHAR": "JNP_BYRABOINA_CHANDRA_SEKHAR", "INC_PAGADALA_PEDDA_RANGASWAMI": "INC_PAGADALA_PEDDA_RANGASWAMI", "BJP_PIDATALA_SARASWATHI": "BJP_PIDATALA_SARASWATHI", "IND_112_SARE_JANARDHAN_NAYUDU": "IND_112_SARE_JANARDHAN_NAYUDU", "IND_112_RAMANA_REDDY_UNDELA": "IND_112_RAMANA_REDDY_UNDELA", "IND_112_SK_RASHEED": "IND_112_SK_RASHEED", "NVSP_ANNAGAANI_SUDHAKAR": "NVSP_ANNAGAANI_SUDHAKAR", "IND_112_MUDAVATH_LAKSHMI_RAMA_NAIK": "IND_112_MUDAVATH_LAKSHMI_RAMA_NAIK", "IND_112_GOTHAM_PANDU_RANGAIAH": "IND_112_GOTHAM_PANDU_RANGAIAH", "IND_112_A_HARI_BABU": "IND_112_A_HARI_BABU", "IND_112_G_PULLA_REDDY": "IND_112_G_PULLA_REDDY", "YSRCP_BURRA_MADHU_SUDHAN_YADAV": "YSRCP_BURRA_MADHU_SUDHAN_YADAV", "TDP_DR_MUKKU_UGRA_NARASIMHA_REDDY": "TDP_DR_MUKKU_UGRA_NARASIMHA_REDDY", "CPI_MANNEPALLI_LAKSHMI_NARAYANA": "CPI_MANNEPALLI_LAKSHMI_NARAYANA", "BJP_PULI_KRISHNA_REDDY": "BJP_PULI_KRISHNA_REDDY", "INC_PASAM_VENKATESWARLU": "INC_PASAM_VENKATESWARLU", "IND_113_UMMADI_BHASKAR_RAO": "IND_113_UMMADI_BHASKAR_RAO", "IND_113_SHAIK_ALLA_BHASHA": "IND_113_SHAIK_ALLA_BHASHA", "ANC_KODAMALA_BENZIMEN": "ANC_KODAMALA_BENZIMEN", "IND_113_SRIDIVYA_BHUTALAPALLI": "IND_113_SRIDIVYA_BHUTALAPALLI", "AIFB_PALURI_VENKATA_RAMANA_REDDY": "AIFB_PALURI_VENKATA_RAMANA_REDDY", "IND_113_NELAPATI_VIJAY_KUMAR": "IND_113_NELAPATI_VIJAY_KUMAR", "IND_113_NAMBULA_VENKATESWARLU": "IND_113_NAMBULA_VENKATESWARLU", "YSRCP_RAMIREDDY_PRATAP_KUMAR_REDDY": "YSRCP_RAMIREDDY_PRATAP_KUMAR_REDDY", "TDP_KATAMREDDY_VISHNU_VARDHAN_REDDY": "TDP_KATAMREDDY_VISHNU_VARDHAN_REDDY", "JNP_PASUPULETI_SUDHAKAR": "JNP_PASUPULETI_SUDHAKAR", "BJP_KANDUKURI_VENKATA_SATYANARAYANA": "BJP_KANDUKURI_VENKATA_SATYANARAYANA", "INC_VENKATA_RAO_CHINTHALA": "INC_VENKATA_RAO_CHINTHALA", "IND_114_GARRE_SURESH_BABU": "IND_114_GARRE_SURESH_BABU", "IND_114_METHUKU_RAJESWARI": "IND_114_METHUKU_RAJESWARI", "PPOI_SABBELLA_VIJAYA_BHASKAR_REDDY": "PPOI_SABBELLA_VIJAYA_BHASKAR_REDDY", "YSRCP_MEKAPATI_GOUTHAM_REDDY": "YSRCP_MEKAPATI_GOUTHAM_REDDY", "TDP_BOLLINENI_KRISHNAIAH": "TDP_BOLLINENI_KRISHNAIAH", "BJP_ANJANEYA_REDDY_KARNATI": "BJP_ANJANEYA_REDDY_KARNATI", "BSP_MANDALA_PADMAJA": "BSP_MANDALA_PADMAJA", "JNP_CHEERLA_CHINNAA_REDDY": "JNP_CHEERLA_CHINNAA_REDDY", "INC_CHEVURU_SREEDHARA_REDDY": "INC_CHEVURU_SREEDHARA_REDDY", "IND_115_SURA_BHASKAR_REDDY": "IND_115_SURA_BHASKAR_REDDY", "IND_115_ULLADI_VENKATAIAH": "IND_115_ULLADI_VENKATAIAH", "IND_115_VALLURU_VIJAYA_BHASKAR_REDDY": "IND_115_VALLURU_VIJAYA_BHASKAR_REDDY", "IND_115_SUMAN_GADUPUDI": "IND_115_SUMAN_GADUPUDI", "PPOI_MURAMREDDY_VENKATESWARLU": "PPOI_MURAMREDDY_VENKATESWARLU", "IND_115_LALI_RAJENDRA": "IND_115_LALI_RAJENDRA", "IND_115_SHAIK_MOINUDDIN": "IND_115_SHAIK_MOINUDDIN", "YSRCP_NALLAPAREDDY_PRASANNA_KUMAR_REDDY": "YSRCP_NALLAPAREDDY_PRASANNA_KUMAR_REDDY", "TDP_POLAMREDDY_SRINIVASULU_REDDY": "TDP_POLAMREDDY_SRINIVASULU_REDDY", "JNP_THELAPALLI_RAGHAVAIAH": "JNP_THELAPALLI_RAGHAVAIAH", "INC_JANA_RAMACHANDRAIAH_GOUD": "INC_JANA_RAMACHANDRAIAH_GOUD", "BJP_MARAM_VIJAYA_LAKSHMI": "BJP_MARAM_VIJAYA_LAKSHMI", "PPOI_S_K_MUZIB_UR_RAHAMAN": "PPOI_S_K_MUZIB_UR_RAHAMAN", "VCK_KOPPALA_SREENIVASULU": "VCK_KOPPALA_SREENIVASULU", "YSRCP_ANIL_KUMAR_POLUBOINA": "YSRCP_ANIL_KUMAR_POLUBOINA", "TDP_NARAYANA_PONGURU": "TDP_NARAYANA_PONGURU", "JNP_KEATHAMREDDY_VINOD_REDDY": "JNP_KEATHAMREDDY_VINOD_REDDY", "BJP_KAKARAPARTHI_JAGANMOHAN_RAO": "BJP_KAKARAPARTHI_JAGANMOHAN_RAO", "INC_SHAIK_FAYAZ": "INC_SHAIK_FAYAZ", "IND_117_VITTAPU_LALITHARAM": "IND_117_VITTAPU_LALITHARAM", "IND_117_SYED_IBRAHIM": "IND_117_SYED_IBRAHIM", "VCK_EMBETI_JAYARAJU": "VCK_EMBETI_JAYARAJU", "IND_117_CHANDRASEKHAR_VINUKONDA": "IND_117_CHANDRASEKHAR_VINUKONDA", "IND_117_NEELLA_VENKAIAH": "IND_117_NEELLA_VENKAIAH", "PPOI_TELU_BALARAM": "PPOI_TELU_BALARAM", "RPI_SHAIK_MANJOOR": "RPI_SHAIK_MANJOOR", "YSRCP_KOTAMREDDY_SRIDHAR_REDDY": "YSRCP_KOTAMREDDY_SRIDHAR_REDDY", "TDP_ABDUL_AZIZ_SHAIK": "TDP_ABDUL_AZIZ_SHAIK", "JNP_CHENNAREDDY_MANUKRANTH": "JNP_CHENNAREDDY_MANUKRANTH", "BJP_BHASKAR_KARANAM": "BJP_BHASKAR_KARANAM", "INC_UDATHA_VENKATARAO": "INC_UDATHA_VENKATARAO", "IND_118_PULLURU_SUNEEL": "IND_118_PULLURU_SUNEEL", "IND_118_SHAIK_CHAN_BASHA": "IND_118_SHAIK_CHAN_BASHA", "IND_118_NAKKA_RAMA_MOHAN": "IND_118_NAKKA_RAMA_MOHAN", "PPOI_A_S_K_SIVA_KUMAR": "PPOI_A_S_K_SIVA_KUMAR", "JHUP_BANDI_MAHESH": "JHUP_BANDI_MAHESH", "IND_118_DEGAPOGU_PRAKASH_KUMAR": "IND_118_DEGAPOGU_PRAKASH_KUMAR", "JAJGP_BATTALA_GANGADHAR": "JAJGP_BATTALA_GANGADHAR", "YSRCP_KAKANI_GOVARDHAN_REDDY": "YSRCP_KAKANI_GOVARDHAN_REDDY", "TDP_CHANDRAMOHAN_REDDY_SOMIREDDY": "TDP_CHANDRAMOHAN_REDDY_SOMIREDDY", "JNP_SUNKARA_HEMALATHA": "JNP_SUNKARA_HEMALATHA", "INC_POOLA_CHANDRASEKHAR": "INC_POOLA_CHANDRASEKHAR", "BJP_MASTHANAIAH_PANDI": "BJP_MASTHANAIAH_PANDI", "PRSHP_JAGANMOHAN_REDDY_KADIYALA": "PRSHP_JAGANMOHAN_REDDY_KADIYALA", "IND_119_KURAPATI_VIJAYA_RAJU": "IND_119_KURAPATI_VIJAYA_RAJU", "PPOI_ANNAM_SRI_HARI": "PPOI_ANNAM_SRI_HARI", "ARPS_M_S_KARIMULLAH": "ARPS_M_S_KARIMULLAH", "VCK_DUDALA_SUDHAKAR": "VCK_DUDALA_SUDHAKAR", "YSRCP_VELAGAPALLI_VARAPRASAD_RAO": "YSRCP_VELAGAPALLI_VARAPRASAD_RAO", "TDP_PASIM_SUNIL_KUMAR": "TDP_PASIM_SUNIL_KUMAR", "BSP_PATTAPU_RAVI": "BSP_PATTAPU_RAVI", "BJP_BHYRAPPA_PARICHERLA": "BJP_BHYRAPPA_PARICHERLA", "INC_PARIMALA_VENKATESWARA_RAO": "INC_PARIMALA_VENKATESWARA_RAO", "DABAP_JUGUNTA_KRISHNAVENI": "DABAP_JUGUNTA_KRISHNAVENI", "IND_120_VADANALA_VENKAIAH": "IND_120_VADANALA_VENKAIAH", "IND_120_ARAVA_PARVATHAIAH": "IND_120_ARAVA_PARVATHAIAH", "IND_120_BODDU_VENKATA_KRISHNAIAH": "IND_120_BODDU_VENKATA_KRISHNAIAH", "IND_120_V_C_NAVEEN_GUPTA": "IND_120_V_C_NAVEEN_GUPTA", "IND_120_BANDI_SRINIVASULU": "IND_120_BANDI_SRINIVASULU", "PPOI_SADEPALLI_SRINIVASULU": "PPOI_SADEPALLI_SRINIVASULU", "YSRCP_KILIVETI_SANJEEVAIAH": "YSRCP_KILIVETI_SANJEEVAIAH", "TDP_DR_PARASA_VENKATA_RATHNAIAH": "TDP_DR_PARASA_VENKATA_RATHNAIAH", "JNP_UYYALA_PRAVEEN": "JNP_UYYALA_PRAVEEN", "INC_CHANDANAMUDI_PEDDA_ESWARAIAH": "INC_CHANDANAMUDI_PEDDA_ESWARAIAH", "BJP_DASARI_RATNAM": "BJP_DASARI_RATNAM", "JPD_KINTHADA_GURUMURTHY": "JPD_KINTHADA_GURUMURTHY", "IND_121_BIGUVA_SRINIVASULU": "IND_121_BIGUVA_SRINIVASULU", "PPOI_PANAKALA_RAMULAMMA": "PPOI_PANAKALA_RAMULAMMA", "IND_121_ADDANKI_CHANDRABABU": "IND_121_ADDANKI_CHANDRABABU", "YSRCP_ANAM_RAMANARAYANA_REDDY": "YSRCP_ANAM_RAMANARAYANA_REDDY", "TDP_KURUGONDLA_RAMAKRISHNA": "TDP_KURUGONDLA_RAMAKRISHNA", "BSP_PALLIPATI_RAJA": "BSP_PALLIPATI_RAJA", "INC_PANTA_SRINIVASULU_REDDY": "INC_PANTA_SRINIVASULU_REDDY", "BJP_S_S_R_NAIDU": "BJP_S_S_R_NAIDU", "IND_122_M_MASTHANAIAH": "IND_122_M_MASTHANAIAH", "IND_122_KONGA_RAMAKANTH": "IND_122_KONGA_RAMAKANTH", "VJNP_CHATLA_MUNIRAJA": "VJNP_CHATLA_MUNIRAJA", "IND_122_ARMUGON_VAYYUURU": "IND_122_ARMUGON_VAYYUURU", "JPD_GURU_PRASANNA_KUMAR_CHALLA": "JPD_GURU_PRASANNA_KUMAR_CHALLA", "PPOI_ATTIRALA_SIVA_KUMAR": "PPOI_ATTIRALA_SIVA_KUMAR", "YSRCP_MEKAPATI_CHANDRA_SEKHAR_REDDY": "YSRCP_MEKAPATI_CHANDRA_SEKHAR_REDDY", "TDP_BOLLINENI_VENKATA_RAMARAO": "TDP_BOLLINENI_VENKATA_RAMARAO", "BJP_GUNDLAPALLI_BHARATH_KUMAR": "BJP_GUNDLAPALLI_BHARATH_KUMAR", "INC_RAMESH_DUDDUKURU": "INC_RAMESH_DUDDUKURU", "IND_123_SWARNA_KONDAIAH": "IND_123_SWARNA_KONDAIAH", "IND_123_SHAIK_JALEEL_BASHA": "IND_123_SHAIK_JALEEL_BASHA", "AIFB_BAPATHI_MADHU": "AIFB_BAPATHI_MADHU", "PPOI_CHAGAM_MAHESWARA": "PPOI_CHAGAM_MAHESWARA", "PRSHP_MADDINENI_CHANDRAIAH": "PRSHP_MADDINENI_CHANDRAIAH", "IND_123_BOLLINENI_VENKATA_SATYANARAYANA": "IND_123_BOLLINENI_VENKATA_SATYANARAYANA", "IND_123_GOLLAPALLI_THIRUPATHAIAH": "IND_123_GOLLAPALLI_THIRUPATHAIAH", "IND_123_CHANGATTI_JAYARAMI_REDDY": "IND_123_CHANGATTI_JAYARAMI_REDDY", "IND_123_CHEJARLA_SUBBA_REDDY": "IND_123_CHEJARLA_SUBBA_REDDY", "YSRCP_DR_G_VENKATA_SUBBAIAH": "YSRCP_DR_G_VENKATA_SUBBAIAH", "TDP_DR_OBULAPURAM_RAJA_SEKHAR": "TDP_DR_OBULAPURAM_RAJA_SEKHAR", "IND_124_NEERUGATTU_DORA_VIJAYA_JYOTHI": "IND_124_NEERUGATTU_DORA_VIJAYA_JYOTHI", "INC_P_M_KAMALAMMA": "INC_P_M_KAMALAMMA", "BSP_NAGIPOGU_PRASAD": "BSP_NAGIPOGU_PRASAD", "BJP_THIRIVEEDI_JAYARAMULU": "BJP_THIRIVEEDI_JAYARAMULU", "IND_124_SEELAM_GANGANNA": "IND_124_SEELAM_GANGANNA", "YSRPP_KOTAPATI_NARASIMHULU": "YSRPP_KOTAPATI_NARASIMHULU", "HMRD_ZINKA_RAVEENDRA_BABU": "HMRD_ZINKA_RAVEENDRA_BABU", "IND_124_THIRIVEEDI_SUBAN": "IND_124_THIRIVEEDI_SUBAN", "ANC_MUTHYALA_PRASAD_RAO": "ANC_MUTHYALA_PRASAD_RAO", "IND_124_S_ABRAHAM": "IND_124_S_ABRAHAM", "IND_124_GUDIME_KISHORE": "IND_124_GUDIME_KISHORE", "PPOI_VELPULA_NARA_SUBBANNA": "PPOI_VELPULA_NARA_SUBBANNA", "YSRCP_MEDA_VENKATA_MALLIKARJUNA_REDDY": "YSRCP_MEDA_VENKATA_MALLIKARJUNA_REDDY", "TDP_BATHYALA_CHANGAL_RAYUDU": "TDP_BATHYALA_CHANGAL_RAYUDU", "INC_POOLA_BHASKAR": "INC_POOLA_BHASKAR", "JNP_PATHIPATI_KUSUMA_KUMARI": "JNP_PATHIPATI_KUSUMA_KUMARI", "BJP_POTHUGUNTA_RAMESH_NAIDU": "BJP_POTHUGUNTA_RAMESH_NAIDU", "ILP_AP_AKKIDASARI_CHANDRAMOHAN": "ILP_AP_AKKIDASARI_CHANDRAMOHAN", "IND_125_ARIGELA_DINESH_CHANDRANATH": "IND_125_ARIGELA_DINESH_CHANDRANATH", "DABAP_BANDI_ESWAR": "DABAP_BANDI_ESWAR", "BCUF_BOJJIREDDY_RAJAMOHAN_REDDY": "BCUF_BOJJIREDDY_RAJAMOHAN_REDDY", "ANC_J_V_RAMANA": "ANC_J_V_RAMANA", "MPP_SURENDRA_REDDY_DUGGANAPALLI": "MPP_SURENDRA_REDDY_DUGGANAPALLI", "PRSHP_O_MALLIKARJUNA_REDDY": "PRSHP_O_MALLIKARJUNA_REDDY", "NAVAP_MADHAN_MOHAN_REDDY_MUMMADI": "NAVAP_MADHAN_MOHAN_REDDY_MUMMADI", "YSRPP_KALADHAR_DASARI": "YSRPP_KALADHAR_DASARI", "PPOI_PENDYALA_VIJAY_KUMAR": "PPOI_PENDYALA_VIJAY_KUMAR", "YSRCP_AMZATH_BASHA_SHAIK_BEPARI": "YSRCP_AMZATH_BASHA_SHAIK_BEPARI", "TDP_AMEER_BABU_NAWABJAN": "TDP_AMEER_BABU_NAWABJAN", "JNP_SUNKARA_SREENIVAS": "JNP_SUNKARA_SREENIVAS", "INC_NAZEER_AHAMED_SHAIK": "INC_NAZEER_AHAMED_SHAIK", "BJP_SREENIVASULU_REDDY_KANDULA": "BJP_SREENIVASULU_REDDY_KANDULA", "IND_126_N_RAVI_SANKAR_REDDY": "IND_126_N_RAVI_SANKAR_REDDY", "IND_126_SYED_SALAUDDIN": "IND_126_SYED_SALAUDDIN", "IND_126_A_RAJAGOPAL_REDDY": "IND_126_A_RAJAGOPAL_REDDY", "IND_126_S_RAMACHANDRUDU": "IND_126_S_RAMACHANDRUDU", "IND_126_SETTYPALLE_SUBRAMANYAM": "IND_126_SETTYPALLE_SUBRAMANYAM", "PPOI_KANDALAM_LAKSHMI": "PPOI_KANDALAM_LAKSHMI", "AYSRCP_AKBER_MABASHA": "AYSRCP_AKBER_MABASHA", "JHUP_K_MAHAMMAD_BASHA": "JHUP_K_MAHAMMAD_BASHA", "IND_126_MOHAMMAD_ALI_SHAIK": "IND_126_MOHAMMAD_ALI_SHAIK", "IND_126_K_KUMARASWAMY": "IND_126_K_KUMARASWAMY", "YSRCP_KORAMUTLA_SREENIVASULU": "YSRCP_KORAMUTLA_SREENIVASULU", "TDP_PANTHAGANI_NARASIMHA_PRASAD": "TDP_PANTHAGANI_NARASIMHA_PRASAD", "JNP_BONASI_VENKATA_SUBBAIAH": "JNP_BONASI_VENKATA_SUBBAIAH", "INC_GOSALA_DEVI": "INC_GOSALA_DEVI", "BJP_PANATHALA_SURESH": "BJP_PANATHALA_SURESH", "IND_127_BONASI_KEERTHANA": "IND_127_BONASI_KEERTHANA", "IND_127_JOROPALLI_NARASIMHULU": "IND_127_JOROPALLI_NARASIMHULU", "IND_127_BANDELA_OBAIAH": "IND_127_BANDELA_OBAIAH", "PPOI_MANDAPALLE_SREENIVASULU": "PPOI_MANDAPALLE_SREENIVASULU", "IUML_MADDELA_RAMADEVI": "IUML_MADDELA_RAMADEVI", "IND_127_KARRATHOTI_HARINARAYANA": "IND_127_KARRATHOTI_HARINARAYANA", "ANC_K_RAMBABU": "ANC_K_RAMBABU", "IND_127_PILLI_RAMA_RAO": "IND_127_PILLI_RAMA_RAO", "IND_127_NAGIRIPATI_SIVAIAH": "IND_127_NAGIRIPATI_SIVAIAH", "IND_127_J_GANGULAIAH": "IND_127_J_GANGULAIAH", "YSRCP_GADIKOTA_SRIKANTH_REDDY": "YSRCP_GADIKOTA_SRIKANTH_REDDY", "TDP_RAMESH_KUMAR_REDDY_REDDAPPAGARI": "TDP_RAMESH_KUMAR_REDDY_REDDAPPAGARI", "INC_SHAIK_ALLABAKASH": "INC_SHAIK_ALLABAKASH", "JNP_S_HASAN_BASHA": "JNP_S_HASAN_BASHA", "BJP_PALAGIRI_SRINIVASA_KUMAR_RAJU": "BJP_PALAGIRI_SRINIVASA_KUMAR_RAJU", "BCUF_PAPIREDDY_MADAN_MOHAN_REDDY": "BCUF_PAPIREDDY_MADAN_MOHAN_REDDY", "PRSHP_K_VINAY_KUMAR_REDDY": "PRSHP_K_VINAY_KUMAR_REDDY", "PPOI_YADAGUTTA_JANGAMAIAH": "PPOI_YADAGUTTA_JANGAMAIAH", "AYSRCP_MANOHARA_REPANA": "AYSRCP_MANOHARA_REPANA", "YSRCP_Y_S_JAGAN_MOHAN_REDDY": "YSRCP_Y_S_JAGAN_MOHAN_REDDY", "TDP_SATISH_REDDY_SINGA_REDDY": "TDP_SATISH_REDDY_SINGA_REDDY", "BJP_PEDABALLI_SUSHMA": "BJP_PEDABALLI_SUSHMA", "INC_VELURU_SRINIVASA_REDDY": "INC_VELURU_SRINIVASA_REDDY", "IND_129_T_RAGHAVA_REDDY": "IND_129_T_RAGHAVA_REDDY", "PPOI_GAVI_REDDY_RAMESWARA_REDDY": "PPOI_GAVI_REDDY_RAMESWARA_REDDY", "IND_129_POREDDY_PRABHAKAR_REDDY": "IND_129_POREDDY_PRABHAKAR_REDDY", "PRSHP_A_VIJAY_KUMAR_REDDY": "PRSHP_A_VIJAY_KUMAR_REDDY", "SMFB_RAJULA_BHASKAR_REDDY": "SMFB_RAJULA_BHASKAR_REDDY", "IND_129_NANDYALA_HEMADRI_REDDY": "IND_129_NANDYALA_HEMADRI_REDDY", "IND_129_DANTHALURU_KRISHNA": "IND_129_DANTHALURU_KRISHNA", "AYSRCP_ANNA_SIVACHANDRA_REDDY": "AYSRCP_ANNA_SIVACHANDRA_REDDY", "YSRCP_POCHIMAREDDY_RAVINDRANATH_REDDY": "YSRCP_POCHIMAREDDY_RAVINDRANATH_REDDY", "TDP_NARASIMHA_REDDY_PUTHA": "TDP_NARASIMHA_REDDY_PUTHA", "BSP_OBAIAH_GUDISENAPALLI": "BSP_OBAIAH_GUDISENAPALLI", "INC_CHANDRA_SEKHAR_REDDY_POTTI_PATI": "INC_CHANDRA_SEKHAR_REDDY_POTTI_PATI", "BJP_PALEM_SURESH_KUMAR_REDDY": "BJP_PALEM_SURESH_KUMAR_REDDY", "AIFB_ABBIREDDY_VEERA_REDDY": "AIFB_ABBIREDDY_VEERA_REDDY", "IND_130_YAMAVARAM_CHANDRASEKHAR": "IND_130_YAMAVARAM_CHANDRASEKHAR", "IND_130_HRUSHIKESHAVA_REDDY_VALLAMBAI": "IND_130_HRUSHIKESHAVA_REDDY_VALLAMBAI", "RPI_A_TADIGOTLA_PRATAP_REDDY": "RPI_A_TADIGOTLA_PRATAP_REDDY", "IND_130_P_NAREN_RAMANJULA_REDDY": "IND_130_P_NAREN_RAMANJULA_REDDY", "IND_130_GANDHAM_MOHAN_BABU": "IND_130_GANDHAM_MOHAN_BABU", "IND_130_MACHUPALLE_VENKATA_SUBBA_REDDY": "IND_130_MACHUPALLE_VENKATA_SUBBA_REDDY", "JD_S_NAREDDY_KISHORE_REDDY": "JD_S_NAREDDY_KISHORE_REDDY", "AYSRCP_SUDHAKAR_REDDY_SINGAM": "AYSRCP_SUDHAKAR_REDDY_SINGAM", "PPOI_VADLAKUNTA_SURYA_PRAKASH": "PPOI_VADLAKUNTA_SURYA_PRAKASH", "YSRCP_MULE_SUDHEER_REDDY": "YSRCP_MULE_SUDHEER_REDDY", "TDP_RAMA_SUBBA_REDDY_PONNAPUREDDY": "TDP_RAMA_SUBBA_REDDY_PONNAPUREDDY", "JNP_ARIGELA_CHINNAGARI_VINAY_KUMAR": "JNP_ARIGELA_CHINNAGARI_VINAY_KUMAR", "INC_VENNAPUSA_SULOCHANA": "INC_VENNAPUSA_SULOCHANA", "BJP_ROTIKADI_RAMAKRISHNA": "BJP_ROTIKADI_RAMAKRISHNA", "IND_131_S_SUDHAKAR_REDDY": "IND_131_S_SUDHAKAR_REDDY", "IND_131_VENKATA_KRISHNAREDDY_LAKKIREDDY": "IND_131_VENKATA_KRISHNAREDDY_LAKKIREDDY", "PRSHP_SUDHEER_REDDY_MARAM_REDDY": "PRSHP_SUDHEER_REDDY_MARAM_REDDY", "IND_131_NAGA_SUBBA_REDDY_VELA": "IND_131_NAGA_SUBBA_REDDY_VELA", "IND_131_ABDUL_KHADHAR_SHAIK": "IND_131_ABDUL_KHADHAR_SHAIK", "SMFB_POREDDY_MAHESWARA_REDDY": "SMFB_POREDDY_MAHESWARA_REDDY", "AYSRCP_ANNA_VIJAYA_SHEKAR": "AYSRCP_ANNA_VIJAYA_SHEKAR", "PPOI_POGAKU_HANUMANTHA_REDDY": "PPOI_POGAKU_HANUMANTHA_REDDY", "BCUF_VONGALA_NAGENDRUDU": "BCUF_VONGALA_NAGENDRUDU", "RJD_VEMPALAKU_RAMANJANEYULU": "RJD_VEMPALAKU_RAMANJANEYULU", "YSRCP_RACHAMALLU_SIVA_PRASAD_REDDY": "YSRCP_RACHAMALLU_SIVA_PRASAD_REDDY", "TDP_MALLELA_LINGA_REDDY": "TDP_MALLELA_LINGA_REDDY", "INC_GORRE_SRINIVASULU": "INC_GORRE_SRINIVASULU", "JNP_ENJA_SOMA_SEKHAR_REDDY": "JNP_ENJA_SOMA_SEKHAR_REDDY", "BJP_KOVVURU_BALA_CHANDRA_REDDY": "BJP_KOVVURU_BALA_CHANDRA_REDDY", "BCUF_P_MUNIREDDY_BANGARU": "BCUF_P_MUNIREDDY_BANGARU", "IND_132_DWARSHALA_GOPINATH_REDDY": "IND_132_DWARSHALA_GOPINATH_REDDY", "PPOI_PALAGIRI_UMA_SANKAR_REDDY": "PPOI_PALAGIRI_UMA_SANKAR_REDDY", "IND_132_KANALA_SAMEL": "IND_132_KANALA_SAMEL", "IND_132_CHINTHALA_SHOBAN_BABU": "IND_132_CHINTHALA_SHOBAN_BABU", "ANC_P_GURAPPA": "ANC_P_GURAPPA", "AYSRCP_S_HAJIVALLI": "AYSRCP_S_HAJIVALLI", "YSRCP_RAGHURAMI_REDDY_SETTIPALLY": "YSRCP_RAGHURAMI_REDDY_SETTIPALLY", "TDP_PUTTA_SUDHAKAR_YADAV": "TDP_PUTTA_SUDHAKAR_YADAV", "INC_KOTAIAHGARI_MALLIKHARJUNA_MURTHY": "INC_KOTAIAHGARI_MALLIKHARJUNA_MURTHY", "JNP_PANDITI_MALHOTRA": "JNP_PANDITI_MALHOTRA", "BJP_B_P_VENKATA_PRATAP_REDDY": "BJP_B_P_VENKATA_PRATAP_REDDY", "IND_133_TUPAKULA_GANGADHAR_REDDY": "IND_133_TUPAKULA_GANGADHAR_REDDY", "IND_133_P_BALAIAH_YADAV": "IND_133_P_BALAIAH_YADAV", "IND_133_IRAGAMREDDY_PRIYADARSHINI_REDDY": "IND_133_IRAGAMREDDY_PRIYADARSHINI_REDDY", "IND_133_PUTTA_SANKAR": "IND_133_PUTTA_SANKAR", "AYSRCP_RAJARAMI_REDDY_SRIYAPUREDDY": "AYSRCP_RAJARAMI_REDDY_SRIYAPUREDDY", "PPOI_D_SREENIVASULU": "PPOI_D_SREENIVASULU", "YSRCP_GANGULA_BRIJENDRA_REDDY_NANI": "YSRCP_GANGULA_BRIJENDRA_REDDY_NANI", "TDP_AKHILA_PRIYA_BHUMA": "TDP_AKHILA_PRIYA_BHUMA", "INC_CHAKALI_PULLAIAH": "INC_CHAKALI_PULLAIAH", "JNP_SULAM_RAMAKRISHNUDU_R_K": "JNP_SULAM_RAMAKRISHNUDU_R_K", "IND_134_VARIKUTI_HANNAMMA": "IND_134_VARIKUTI_HANNAMMA", "BJP_BOREDDY_LAKSHMI_REDDY_ADVOCATE": "BJP_BOREDDY_LAKSHMI_REDDY_ADVOCATE", "IND_134_C_RAGHUNADHA_REDDY": "IND_134_C_RAGHUNADHA_REDDY", "IND_134_DR_YARRANAGU_PRASAD": "IND_134_DR_YARRANAGU_PRASAD", "IND_134_BOREDDY_RAJA_SEKHAR_REDDY": "IND_134_BOREDDY_RAJA_SEKHAR_REDDY", "IND_134_GOPIREDDY_PULLAREDDY": "IND_134_GOPIREDDY_PULLAREDDY", "IND_134_KUNDURU_RAMI_REDDY": "IND_134_KUNDURU_RAMI_REDDY", "IND_134_ANNEM_NAGA_PRATHAP_REDDY": "IND_134_ANNEM_NAGA_PRATHAP_REDDY", "IND_134_GANGULA_PRATHAP": "IND_134_GANGULA_PRATHAP", "IND_134_KAMATHAM_SUBBAAREDDY": "IND_134_KAMATHAM_SUBBAAREDDY", "IND_134_YEDDULA_VENKATESWARLU": "IND_134_YEDDULA_VENKATESWARLU", "YSRCP_SILPA_CHAKRAPANI_REDDY": "YSRCP_SILPA_CHAKRAPANI_REDDY", "TDP_BUDDA_RAJASEKHARA_REDDY": "TDP_BUDDA_RAJASEKHARA_REDDY", "JNP_SANNAPUREDDY_SUJALA": "JNP_SANNAPUREDDY_SUJALA", "INC_NAYAB_SYED_THASLIMA": "INC_NAYAB_SYED_THASLIMA", "BJP_BUDDA_SRIKANTH_REDDY": "BJP_BUDDA_SRIKANTH_REDDY", "IUML_ABDUL_HAKEEM": "IUML_ABDUL_HAKEEM", "IND_135_NARLA_VENKATA_RAGHAVA_REDDY": "IND_135_NARLA_VENKATA_RAGHAVA_REDDY", "IND_135_Y_LOKESWARA_REDDY": "IND_135_Y_LOKESWARA_REDDY", "IND_135_S_MEER_HUSSAIN": "IND_135_S_MEER_HUSSAIN", "PPOI_TALARI_VENKATESWARLU": "PPOI_TALARI_VENKATESWARLU", "RPC_S_CH_P_MALLESWARUDU": "RPC_S_CH_P_MALLESWARUDU", "YSRCP_THOGURU_ARTHUR": "YSRCP_THOGURU_ARTHUR", "TDP_BANDI_JAYARAJU": "TDP_BANDI_JAYARAJU", "JNP_ANNAPUREDDY_BALA_VENKAT": "JNP_ANNAPUREDDY_BALA_VENKAT", "INC_ASHOKARATHNAM_C": "INC_ASHOKARATHNAM_C", "IND_136_K_V_RAMANA": "IND_136_K_V_RAMANA", "IPBP_PALLE_NAGARAJU": "IPBP_PALLE_NAGARAJU", "IND_136_SAGINELA_VENKATESWARLU": "IND_136_SAGINELA_VENKATESWARLU", "IND_136_MURTHATI_RAJU": "IND_136_MURTHATI_RAJU", "YSRCP_ABDUL_HAFEEZ_KHAN": "YSRCP_ABDUL_HAFEEZ_KHAN", "TDP_T_G_BHARATH": "TDP_T_G_BHARATH", "CPM_TEETLA_SHADRACK": "CPM_TEETLA_SHADRACK", "INC_M_JOHN_WILSON": "INC_M_JOHN_WILSON", "BJP_VENKATA_SUBBA_REDDY_B": "BJP_VENKATA_SUBBA_REDDY_B", "IND_137_K_CHANDRAKANTH": "IND_137_K_CHANDRAKANTH", "BCUF_ABDUL_SATTAR_A_S_R": "BCUF_ABDUL_SATTAR_A_S_R", "IND_137_S_A_GAFFOOR": "IND_137_S_A_GAFFOOR", "IND_137_JANGAM_BHARATH_KUMAR": "IND_137_JANGAM_BHARATH_KUMAR", "PRSHP_DR_KAKARAWADA_CHINNA_VENKATA_SWAMY": "PRSHP_DR_KAKARAWADA_CHINNA_VENKATA_SWAMY", "IND_137_JALLI_VENKATESH_VALMIKI": "IND_137_JALLI_VENKATESH_VALMIKI", "IND_137_S_NAZEER_AHMMAD": "IND_137_S_NAZEER_AHMMAD", "IND_137_S_CHANDRA_SEKHAR": "IND_137_S_CHANDRA_SEKHAR", "AYSRCP_ABDUL_HAFEEZ_KHAN_B": "AYSRCP_ABDUL_HAFEEZ_KHAN_B", "IND_137_B_SREENIVASA_RAO": "IND_137_B_SREENIVASA_RAO", "IND_137_ISMAIL_MOHAMMED": "IND_137_ISMAIL_MOHAMMED", "RPI_A_MANCHALLA_BABUJI": "RPI_A_MANCHALLA_BABUJI", "IND_137_K_A_VIJAYA_SARATHI": "IND_137_K_A_VIJAYA_SARATHI", "SMFB_CHAKRAVARTHI_NAYAKANTI": "SMFB_CHAKRAVARTHI_NAYAKANTI", "IND_137_S_A_N_GANI": "IND_137_S_A_N_GANI", "RPI_KH_BANDAPALLI_SHIVA_KUMAR": "RPI_KH_BANDAPALLI_SHIVA_KUMAR", "RRS_GORANTLA_RAMANJANEYULU": "RRS_GORANTLA_RAMANJANEYULU", "IND_137_PULI_JACOB": "IND_137_PULI_JACOB", "ICF_PARADESI_YONATHAN": "ICF_PARADESI_YONATHAN", "IND_137_SHAIK_ABDUL_GAFOOR": "IND_137_SHAIK_ABDUL_GAFOOR", "IND_137_SANDYAPOGU_RAGHAVENDRA": "IND_137_SANDYAPOGU_RAGHAVENDRA", "IND_137_V_E_RAJU": "IND_137_V_E_RAJU", "IND_137_B_SURYA_PRAKASH_REDDY": "IND_137_B_SURYA_PRAKASH_REDDY", "YSRCP_KATASANI_RAMBHUPAL_REDDY": "YSRCP_KATASANI_RAMBHUPAL_REDDY", "TDP_GOWRU_CHARITHA_REDDY": "TDP_GOWRU_CHARITHA_REDDY", "JNP_CHINTHA_SURESH_BABU": "JNP_CHINTHA_SURESH_BABU", "INC_MADANABOINA_NAGA_MADHU_YADAV": "INC_MADANABOINA_NAGA_MADHU_YADAV", "BJP_G_S_NAGARAJU": "BJP_G_S_NAGARAJU", "IND_138_NAYAKANTI_KATTUBADI_JAYANNA": "IND_138_NAYAKANTI_KATTUBADI_JAYANNA", "IPBP_KUMAR_NAYAKANTI": "IPBP_KUMAR_NAYAKANTI", "IND_138_REDDYPOGU_AYYANNA": "IND_138_REDDYPOGU_AYYANNA", "WPOI_SHAIK_GULAM_MOHIDDIN_JAFURULLA": "WPOI_SHAIK_GULAM_MOHIDDIN_JAFURULLA", "IND_138_KURUVA_RAVIKUMAR": "IND_138_KURUVA_RAVIKUMAR", "SP_A_GOWTHAM_KRISHNA": "SP_A_GOWTHAM_KRISHNA", "AIFB_SHAIK_ABUBAKAR_BASHA": "AIFB_SHAIK_ABUBAKAR_BASHA", "AYSRCP_BATHULA_SESHASAYANA_REDDY": "AYSRCP_BATHULA_SESHASAYANA_REDDY", "YSRCP_SHILPA_RAVI_CHANDRA_KISHORE_REDDY": "YSRCP_SHILPA_RAVI_CHANDRA_KISHORE_REDDY", "TDP_BHUMA_BRAHMANANDHA_REDDY": "TDP_BHUMA_BRAHMANANDHA_REDDY", "JNP_SAJJALA_SREEDHAR_REDDY": "JNP_SAJJALA_SREEDHAR_REDDY", "SDPI_ATAULLAH_KHAN": "SDPI_ATAULLAH_KHAN", "BJP_MALIKIREDDY_SIVA_SANKAR_REDDY": "BJP_MALIKIREDDY_SIVA_SANKAR_REDDY", "INC_DR_CHINTHALA_MOHAN_RAO": "INC_DR_CHINTHALA_MOHAN_RAO", "BCUF_YELLA_SUBBARAYUDU": "BCUF_YELLA_SUBBARAYUDU", "IND_139_VANKIRI_RAMA_CHANDRUDU": "IND_139_VANKIRI_RAMA_CHANDRUDU", "IND_139_VADURI_UMAKANTH": "IND_139_VADURI_UMAKANTH", "IND_139_RAVI_CHANDRA_REDDY": "IND_139_RAVI_CHANDRA_REDDY", "SP_RAGHAVENDRA": "SP_RAGHAVENDRA", "IND_139_DERENGULA_CHANDRA_SEKHAR": "IND_139_DERENGULA_CHANDRA_SEKHAR", "IND_139_PERI_CHINNA_RAJU": "IND_139_PERI_CHINNA_RAJU", "IND_139_MANJULA_SUBBARAYUDU": "IND_139_MANJULA_SUBBARAYUDU", "IND_139_ATTAR_MOHAMMAD_PARVEZ": "IND_139_ATTAR_MOHAMMAD_PARVEZ", "YSRCP_KATASANI_RAMI_REDDY": "YSRCP_KATASANI_RAMI_REDDY", "TDP_B_C_JANARDHAN_REDDY": "TDP_B_C_JANARDHAN_REDDY", "INC_PUTLURU_HARI_PRASAD_REDDY": "INC_PUTLURU_HARI_PRASAD_REDDY", "JNP_ARAVINDA_RANI": "JNP_ARAVINDA_RANI", "IND_140_B_SURENDRANATHA_REDDY": "IND_140_B_SURENDRANATHA_REDDY", "BCUF_B_C_RAMANADHA_REDDY": "BCUF_B_C_RAMANADHA_REDDY", "BJP_B_LINGANNA": "BJP_B_LINGANNA", "IND_140_G_SUBBARAYUDU": "IND_140_G_SUBBARAYUDU", "IND_140_IDAMAKANTI_NADIPI_PAKKIR_REDDY": "IND_140_IDAMAKANTI_NADIPI_PAKKIR_REDDY", "JTSSJP_DATLA_SRIRAMULU_YADAV": "JTSSJP_DATLA_SRIRAMULU_YADAV", "IND_140_K_RAMUDU": "IND_140_K_RAMUDU", "IND_140_BANDI_BRAHMANANDA_REDDY": "IND_140_BANDI_BRAHMANANDA_REDDY", "AIFB_MALKIREDDY_ASWARDHA_REDDY": "AIFB_MALKIREDDY_ASWARDHA_REDDY", "RPI_GOPAGI_SATYAMANNA": "RPI_GOPAGI_SATYAMANNA", "SP_GOGULA_SUGUNAMMA": "SP_GOGULA_SUGUNAMMA", "YSRCP_BUGGANA_RAJA_REDDY": "YSRCP_BUGGANA_RAJA_REDDY", "TDP_KAMBALAPADU_EDIGA_PRATHAP": "TDP_KAMBALAPADU_EDIGA_PRATHAP", "CPI_K_RAMANJANEYULU": "CPI_K_RAMANJANEYULU", "INC_VENKATA_SIVA_REDDY_GUNAPALLE": "INC_VENKATA_SIVA_REDDY_GUNAPALLE", "BJP_S_V_RAMANA_RAYAL": "BJP_S_V_RAMANA_RAYAL", "IND_141_SUDHAKAR_REDDY": "IND_141_SUDHAKAR_REDDY", "IND_141_V_SREENIVASA_REDDY": "IND_141_V_SREENIVASA_REDDY", "IND_141_T_MADDILETI_NAIDU": "IND_141_T_MADDILETI_NAIDU", "IND_141_K_SRINIVASA_REDDY": "IND_141_K_SRINIVASA_REDDY", "PRSHP_BONALA_RAJENDRA": "PRSHP_BONALA_RAJENDRA", "IND_141_KRISHNA_PRASAD": "IND_141_KRISHNA_PRASAD", "IND_141_BOYA_HANUMANTHU": "IND_141_BOYA_HANUMANTHU", "IND_141_KAMIREDDY_RANGA_REDDY": "IND_141_KAMIREDDY_RANGA_REDDY", "PPOI_K_RAMACHANDRA_REDDY": "PPOI_K_RAMACHANDRA_REDDY", "NAVAP_I_J_VENKATA_RAMANA": "NAVAP_I_J_VENKATA_RAMANA", "YSRCP_KANGATI_SREEDEVI": "YSRCP_KANGATI_SREEDEVI", "TDP_K_E_SHYAM_KUMAR": "TDP_K_E_SHYAM_KUMAR", "INC_BOYA_KRANTHI_NAIDU": "INC_BOYA_KRANTHI_NAIDU", "JNP_K_L_MURTHI": "JNP_K_L_MURTHI", "BJP_EEDIGA_RANGA_GOUD": "BJP_EEDIGA_RANGA_GOUD", "PPOI_M_K_GEETHA_KARANAM": "PPOI_M_K_GEETHA_KARANAM", "IND_142_M_KASANNA": "IND_142_M_KASANNA", "IND_142_K_VIJAYA_BHASKAR": "IND_142_K_VIJAYA_BHASKAR", "IND_142_M_RAJU": "IND_142_M_RAJU", "YSRCP_JARADODDI_SUDHAKAR": "YSRCP_JARADODDI_SUDHAKAR", "TDP_BURLA_RAMANJANEYULU": "TDP_BURLA_RAMANJANEYULU", "BSP_AREKANTI_JEEVAN_RAJ": "BSP_AREKANTI_JEEVAN_RAJ", "INC_DAMODARAM_RADHAKRISHNA_MURTHY": "INC_DAMODARAM_RADHAKRISHNA_MURTHY", "BJP_MEESALA_PREM_KUMAR": "BJP_MEESALA_PREM_KUMAR", "PRSHP_JOSHUA_DANIEL": "PRSHP_JOSHUA_DANIEL", "IND_143_K_CHANDRA_SEKHAR": "IND_143_K_CHANDRA_SEKHAR", "SP_R_KALAVATHI": "SP_R_KALAVATHI", "PPOI_P_ELISHA": "PPOI_P_ELISHA", "YSRCP_K_CHENNAKESAVA_REDDY": "YSRCP_K_CHENNAKESAVA_REDDY", "TDP_B_JAYA_NAGESWARA_REDDY": "TDP_B_JAYA_NAGESWARA_REDDY", "BJP_K_R_MURAHARI_REDDY": "BJP_K_R_MURAHARI_REDDY", "JNP_REKHA_JAVVAJI": "JNP_REKHA_JAVVAJI", "INC_KADIMETLA_LAKSHMI_NARAYANA_REDDY": "INC_KADIMETLA_LAKSHMI_NARAYANA_REDDY", "SDPI_DEVANAKONDA_MOHAMMAD_YOUSUF": "SDPI_DEVANAKONDA_MOHAMMAD_YOUSUF", "IND_144_VADDE_URUKUNDU": "IND_144_VADDE_URUKUNDU", "IND_144_Y_J_ERANNA": "IND_144_Y_J_ERANNA", "YSRCP_Y_BALANAGI_REDDY": "YSRCP_Y_BALANAGI_REDDY", "TDP_PALAKURTHI_THIKKA_REDDY": "TDP_PALAKURTHI_THIKKA_REDDY", "INC_SHIVA_PRAKASH_REDDY_A_D": "INC_SHIVA_PRAKASH_REDDY_A_D", "BJP_JALLI_MADHUSUDAN": "BJP_JALLI_MADHUSUDAN", "JNP_B_LAKSHMANNA": "JNP_B_LAKSHMANNA", "IND_145_G_YELLA_REDDY": "IND_145_G_YELLA_REDDY", "IND_145_T_KESHAPPA": "IND_145_T_KESHAPPA", "PPOI_B_EEMANTU": "PPOI_B_EEMANTU", "YSRCP_Y_SAI_PRASAD_REDDY": "YSRCP_Y_SAI_PRASAD_REDDY", "TDP_KONKA_MEENAKSHI_NAIDU": "TDP_KONKA_MEENAKSHI_NAIDU", "JNP_N_MALLAPPA": "JNP_N_MALLAPPA", "BJP_KUNIGIRI_NEELAKANTA": "BJP_KUNIGIRI_NEELAKANTA", "INC_BOYA_NEELAKANTAPPA": "INC_BOYA_NEELAKANTAPPA", "IND_146_I_RAM_MOHAN_GOUD": "IND_146_I_RAM_MOHAN_GOUD", "IND_146_FAIYAZ_BASHA_AMLIVALE": "IND_146_FAIYAZ_BASHA_AMLIVALE", "IND_146_A_NOOR_AHMED": "IND_146_A_NOOR_AHMED", "IND_146_M_D_FAROOQ_HUSSAIN": "IND_146_M_D_FAROOQ_HUSSAIN", "IND_146_K_NARENDRA_YADAV": "IND_146_K_NARENDRA_YADAV", "IND_146_G_T_S_PRASAD_YADAV": "IND_146_G_T_S_PRASAD_YADAV", "YSRCP_GUMMANUR_JAYARAM": "YSRCP_GUMMANUR_JAYARAM", "TDP_KOTLA_SUJATHAMMA": "TDP_KOTLA_SUJATHAMMA", "JNP_S_VENKAPPA": "JNP_S_VENKAPPA", "INC_D_ASHA_BEGUM": "INC_D_ASHA_BEGUM", "BJP_DUMMA_VENKATARAMUDU": "BJP_DUMMA_VENKATARAMUDU", "PRSHP_B_JAYA_RAMUDU": "PRSHP_B_JAYA_RAMUDU", "IND_147_ATLA_BABUL_REDDY": "IND_147_ATLA_BABUL_REDDY", "IND_147_BASAVANA_GOUD": "IND_147_BASAVANA_GOUD", "IND_147_Y_JAYASREE": "IND_147_Y_JAYASREE", "IND_147_AVULA_CHANDRA_SEKHAR": "IND_147_AVULA_CHANDRA_SEKHAR", "YSRCP_KAPU_RAMACHANDRA_REDDY": "YSRCP_KAPU_RAMACHANDRA_REDDY", "TDP_KALAVA_SRINIVASULU": "TDP_KALAVA_SRINIVASULU", "JNP_MANJUNATH_GOWD": "JNP_MANJUNATH_GOWD", "INC_M_B_CHINNAPPAYYA": "INC_M_B_CHINNAPPAYYA", "IND_148_S_RAGHAVENDRA": "IND_148_S_RAGHAVENDRA", "BJP_J_VASUNDARA": "BJP_J_VASUNDARA", "IND_148_C_SRINIVASULU": "IND_148_C_SRINIVASULU", "IND_148_RAMCHANDRAREDDY_U": "IND_148_RAMCHANDRAREDDY_U", "IND_148_YADAV_SREENIVASULU": "IND_148_YADAV_SREENIVASULU", "IND_148_KAVALI_SREENIVASULU": "IND_148_KAVALI_SREENIVASULU", "PPOI_M_SRINIVASULU": "PPOI_M_SRINIVASULU", "TDP_PAYYAVULA_KESHAV": "TDP_PAYYAVULA_KESHAV", "YSRCP_Y_VISWESWARA_REDDY": "YSRCP_Y_VISWESWARA_REDDY", "INC_PODAPATI_RAMA_NAIDU": "INC_PODAPATI_RAMA_NAIDU", "JNP_SAKE_RAVIKUMAR": "JNP_SAKE_RAVIKUMAR", "BJP_KOTHA_SREENIVASULU": "BJP_KOTHA_SREENIVASULU", "IND_149_D_RADHA": "IND_149_D_RADHA", "IND_149_S_VENKATESWARA": "IND_149_S_VENKATESWARA", "PPOI_D_SHIVA_KUMAR": "PPOI_D_SHIVA_KUMAR", "IND_149_M_VISWESWARAIAH": "IND_149_M_VISWESWARAIAH", "IND_149_V_KESHAVA_NARAYANA": "IND_149_V_KESHAVA_NARAYANA", "PRSHP_VISWANATHA_REDDY_K": "PRSHP_VISWANATHA_REDDY_K", "IND_149_B_RAJESH": "IND_149_B_RAJESH", "IND_149_MOLAKA_BALA_RAMANJINEYULU": "IND_149_MOLAKA_BALA_RAMANJINEYULU", "IND_149_KURUBA_LALEPPA": "IND_149_KURUBA_LALEPPA", "IND_149_KUMMATHI_HANUMANTHA_REDDY": "IND_149_KUMMATHI_HANUMANTHA_REDDY", "YSRCP_Y_VENKATARAMA_REDDY": "YSRCP_Y_VENKATARAMA_REDDY", "TDP_R_JITENDRA_GOWD": "TDP_R_JITENDRA_GOWD", "JNP_KOTRIKE_MADHUSUDAN": "JNP_KOTRIKE_MADHUSUDAN", "INC_K_PRABHAKAR": "INC_K_PRABHAKAR", "BJP_PASUPULA_HARIHARANATH": "BJP_PASUPULA_HARIHARANATH", "IND_150_M_RAMANJANEYULU": "IND_150_M_RAMANJANEYULU", "IND_150_THANNIRU_SREENIVASULU": "IND_150_THANNIRU_SREENIVASULU", "IND_150_S_RAMMOHAN": "IND_150_S_RAMMOHAN", "PPOI_GOPA_HEMALATHA": "PPOI_GOPA_HEMALATHA", "JASWP_P_VENKATESH": "JASWP_P_VENKATESH", "IND_150_AKULA_MURALI_KRISHNA": "IND_150_AKULA_MURALI_KRISHNA", "IND_150_KALLAMADI_SATYA_SUDARSHAN_GUPTA": "IND_150_KALLAMADI_SATYA_SUDARSHAN_GUPTA", "YSRCP_K_PEDDA_REDDY": "YSRCP_K_PEDDA_REDDY", "TDP_ASHMIT_REDDY_J_C": "TDP_ASHMIT_REDDY_J_C", "JNP_KADIRI_SREEKANTH_REDDY": "JNP_KADIRI_SREEKANTH_REDDY", "INC_GUJJALA_NAGI_REDDY": "INC_GUJJALA_NAGI_REDDY", "BJP_JANGAMREDDY_ANKAL_REDDY": "BJP_JANGAMREDDY_ANKAL_REDDY", "IND_151_BINGI_PRASAD": "IND_151_BINGI_PRASAD", "IND_151_RAMINENI_RAMAMOHAN": "IND_151_RAMINENI_RAMAMOHAN", "AIFB_B_JAGADEESWARA_REDDY": "AIFB_B_JAGADEESWARA_REDDY", "IND_151_MAMILLA_NARAYANA_SWAMY": "IND_151_MAMILLA_NARAYANA_SWAMY", "IND_151_PALURU_NEELAKANTA_ACHARI": "IND_151_PALURU_NEELAKANTA_ACHARI", "YSRCP_PADMAVATHY_JONNALAGADDA": "YSRCP_PADMAVATHY_JONNALAGADDA", "TDP_BANDARU_SRAVANI_SREE": "TDP_BANDARU_SRAVANI_SREE", "INC_DR_SAKE_SAILAJANATH": "INC_DR_SAKE_SAILAJANATH", "BSP_MIDDE_RAVINDRA_BABU": "BSP_MIDDE_RAVINDRA_BABU", "BJP_CHALLA_CHINNA_VENKATESU": "BJP_CHALLA_CHINNA_VENKATESU", "IND_152_KODAMALA_OBULESU": "IND_152_KODAMALA_OBULESU", "IND_152_M_OBULAPATHI": "IND_152_M_OBULAPATHI", "PPOI_M_SURENDRA": "PPOI_M_SURENDRA", "IND_152_ADINARAYANA_S": "IND_152_ADINARAYANA_S", "YSRCP_ANANTHA_VENKATARAMI_REDDY": "YSRCP_ANANTHA_VENKATARAMI_REDDY", "TDP_PRABHAKAR_CHOWDARY_V": "TDP_PRABHAKAR_CHOWDARY_V", "JNP_T_C_VARUN": "JNP_T_C_VARUN", "INC_G_NAGA_RAJU": "INC_G_NAGA_RAJU", "BJP_AMARNATH_JANGATI": "BJP_AMARNATH_JANGATI", "IUML_RAHAMTHULLA": "IUML_RAHAMTHULLA", "IND_153_YELAMANJULA_RAJESH": "IND_153_YELAMANJULA_RAJESH", "IND_153_G_BALAJI_VISWANATH": "IND_153_G_BALAJI_VISWANATH", "IND_153_P_VENKATA_BABU_NAIDU": "IND_153_P_VENKATA_BABU_NAIDU", "SUCI_C_D_RAGHAVENDRA": "SUCI_C_D_RAGHAVENDRA", "IND_153_KATTAM_KARTHIK": "IND_153_KATTAM_KARTHIK", "NVSP_SIVAIAH": "NVSP_SIVAIAH", "YSRCP_K_V_USHA_SRICHARAN": "YSRCP_K_V_USHA_SRICHARAN", "TDP_UMAMAHESWARA_NAIDU_MADINENI": "TDP_UMAMAHESWARA_NAIDU_MADINENI", "INC_NEELAKANTAPURAM_RAGHUVEERA_REDDY": "INC_NEELAKANTAPURAM_RAGHUVEERA_REDDY", "JNP_RAHUL_KARANAM": "JNP_RAHUL_KARANAM", "BJP_MUPPURI_DEVARAJ": "BJP_MUPPURI_DEVARAJ", "IND_154_SREERANGARAJULA_GOPINATH_RAYAL": "IND_154_SREERANGARAJULA_GOPINATH_RAYAL", "IND_154_MANNILA_KISHOR": "IND_154_MANNILA_KISHOR", "PRSHP_Y_USHARANI": "PRSHP_Y_USHARANI", "IND_154_V_ADEPPA": "IND_154_V_ADEPPA", "IND_154_GOPARAM_GOVINDARAJULU": "IND_154_GOPARAM_GOVINDARAJULU", "IND_154_BALARAM_NAIK_N": "IND_154_BALARAM_NAIK_N", "VCK_M_RAMESH": "VCK_M_RAMESH", "IND_154_GONIMANATHOTA_PEDDA_OBALESU": "IND_154_GONIMANATHOTA_PEDDA_OBALESU", "IND_154_C_SREENIVASULU": "IND_154_C_SREENIVASULU", "PPOI_SHAIK_PAKRUDDIN": "PPOI_SHAIK_PAKRUDDIN", "YSRCP_THOPUDURTHI_PRAKASH_REDDY": "YSRCP_THOPUDURTHI_PRAKASH_REDDY", "TDP_PARITALA_SREERAM": "TDP_PARITALA_SREERAM", "JNP_SAKE_PAVAN_KUMAR": "JNP_SAKE_PAVAN_KUMAR", "BJP_BYALLA_ERRISWAMY": "BJP_BYALLA_ERRISWAMY", "IND_155_SURIPOKALA_CHINNA_PEDDANNA": "IND_155_SURIPOKALA_CHINNA_PEDDANNA", "IND_155_K_VIJAY_KUMAR_NAIK": "IND_155_K_VIJAY_KUMAR_NAIK", "IND_155_SAKE_POTHULAIAH": "IND_155_SAKE_POTHULAIAH", "IND_155_B_RAMADASU": "IND_155_B_RAMADASU", "IND_155_BANDARU_LINGANNA": "IND_155_BANDARU_LINGANNA", "IND_155_B_NARESH": "IND_155_B_NARESH", "YSRCP_M_THIPPESWAMY": "YSRCP_M_THIPPESWAMY", "TDP_K_ERANNA": "TDP_K_ERANNA", "INC_K_ASWARTHANARAYANA": "INC_K_ASWARTHANARAYANA", "BSP_MALA_SOMANNA": "BSP_MALA_SOMANNA", "BJP_N_HANUMANTHAPPA": "BJP_N_HANUMANTHAPPA", "IND_156_KONKALLU_H_HANUMANTHARAYA": "IND_156_KONKALLU_H_HANUMANTHARAYA", "IND_156_P_HANUMANTHA_RAJU": "IND_156_P_HANUMANTHA_RAJU", "TDP_NANDAMURI_BALAKRISHNA": "TDP_NANDAMURI_BALAKRISHNA", "YSRCP_SHAIK_MOHAMMED_IQBAL": "YSRCP_SHAIK_MOHAMMED_IQBAL", "JNP_AKULA_UMESH": "JNP_AKULA_UMESH", "INC_T_BALAJI_MANOHAR": "INC_T_BALAJI_MANOHAR", "BJP_P_D_PARTHA_SARATHY": "BJP_P_D_PARTHA_SARATHY", "IND_157_ADI_NARAYANA_B": "IND_157_ADI_NARAYANA_B", "SUCI_C_G_N_ASHOKA": "SUCI_C_G_N_ASHOKA", "IND_157_V_K_SRENIVASULU": "IND_157_V_K_SRENIVASULU", "IND_157_DUDHEKULA_GOUS_PEERA": "IND_157_DUDHEKULA_GOUS_PEERA", "IND_157_NARASIMHA_MURTHY_N": "IND_157_NARASIMHA_MURTHY_N", "IND_157_M_NARASIMHA_MURTHY": "IND_157_M_NARASIMHA_MURTHY", "YSRCP_MALAGUNDLA_SANKARANARAYANA": "YSRCP_MALAGUNDLA_SANKARANARAYANA", "TDP_B_K_PARTHASARATHI": "TDP_B_K_PARTHASARATHI", "JNP_PEDDI_REDDY_GARI_VARALAKSHMI": "JNP_PEDDI_REDDY_GARI_VARALAKSHMI", "INC_PURROLLA_NARASIMHAPPA": "INC_PURROLLA_NARASIMHAPPA", "BJP_GORANTLA_MOHAN_RAO_SEKHAR": "BJP_GORANTLA_MOHAN_RAO_SEKHAR", "NPT_E_NARASIMHULU": "NPT_E_NARASIMHULU", "IND_158_B_MAHESH": "IND_158_B_MAHESH", "IND_158_U_D_KULLAYAPPA": "IND_158_U_D_KULLAYAPPA", "IND_158_BOYA_ADISESHU": "IND_158_BOYA_ADISESHU", "IND_158_AVULA_RAGHAVENDRA_REDDY": "IND_158_AVULA_RAGHAVENDRA_REDDY", "PPOI_VATTI_JAYADEVA": "PPOI_VATTI_JAYADEVA", "YSRCP_DUDDUKUNTA_SREEDHAR_REDDY": "YSRCP_DUDDUKUNTA_SREEDHAR_REDDY", "TDP_PALLE_RAGHUNATHA_REDDY": "TDP_PALLE_RAGHUNATHA_REDDY", "JNP_PATTI_CHALAPATHI": "JNP_PATTI_CHALAPATHI", "INC_KOTA_SWETHA": "INC_KOTA_SWETHA", "BJP_HANUMANTHA_REDDY_YALAPALA": "BJP_HANUMANTHA_REDDY_YALAPALA", "IND_159_K_SREERAM_NAIK": "IND_159_K_SREERAM_NAIK", "IND_159_AMMINENI_YASODA": "IND_159_AMMINENI_YASODA", "IND_159_B_RAGHUNATHAREDDY": "IND_159_B_RAGHUNATHAREDDY", "IND_159_A_RAGHU_NATHA_REDDY": "IND_159_A_RAGHU_NATHA_REDDY", "IND_159_GODDENDLA_VENKATESH": "IND_159_GODDENDLA_VENKATESH", "IND_159_POOLA_SREENATH_REDDY": "IND_159_POOLA_SREENATH_REDDY", "IND_159_D_SHYAM_SUNDHAR_REDDY": "IND_159_D_SHYAM_SUNDHAR_REDDY", "PPOI_POTHURU_ARUNA": "PPOI_POTHURU_ARUNA", "IND_159_AMPAVATHINI_GOVINDU": "IND_159_AMPAVATHINI_GOVINDU", "YSRCP_KETHIREDDY_VENKATARAMI_REDDY": "YSRCP_KETHIREDDY_VENKATARAMI_REDDY", "TDP_GONUGUNTLA_SURYANARAYANA": "TDP_GONUGUNTLA_SURYANARAYANA", "JNP_CHILAKAM_MADHUSUDHANA_REDDY": "JNP_CHILAKAM_MADHUSUDHANA_REDDY", "INC_RANGANA_ASWARTHA_NARAYANA": "INC_RANGANA_ASWARTHA_NARAYANA", "BJP_E_SUDARSHAN_REDDY": "BJP_E_SUDARSHAN_REDDY", "IND_160_J_SURYA_NARAYANA": "IND_160_J_SURYA_NARAYANA", "IND_160_N_RAVEENDRA_REDDY": "IND_160_N_RAVEENDRA_REDDY", "AIFB_GADDAM_RAJAGOPAL": "AIFB_GADDAM_RAJAGOPAL", "IND_160_P_VENKATARAMI_REDDY": "IND_160_P_VENKATARAMI_REDDY", "IND_160_K_SUDHAKAR_REDDY": "IND_160_K_SUDHAKAR_REDDY", "PPOI_PETA_RAJESWARI": "PPOI_PETA_RAJESWARI", "IND_160_P_VENKATARAMI_REDDY_2": "IND_160_P_VENKATARAMI_REDDY_2", "IND_160_MANJULA_SREENIVASULU": "IND_160_MANJULA_SREENIVASULU", "IND_160_G_KESAVAIAH": "IND_160_G_KESAVAIAH", "IND_160_S_NARASIMHA_REDDY": "IND_160_S_NARASIMHA_REDDY", "YSRCP_P_V_SIDDA_REDDY": "YSRCP_P_V_SIDDA_REDDY", "TDP_KANDIKUNTA_VENKATA_PRASAD": "TDP_KANDIKUNTA_VENKATA_PRASAD", "AIFB_K_VAJRA_BHASKARAREDDY": "AIFB_K_VAJRA_BHASKARAREDDY", "JNP_BHYRAVA_PRASAD_PERUGU_CHINNA": "JNP_BHYRAVA_PRASAD_PERUGU_CHINNA", "INC_PATHAN_KHASEEM_KHAN": "INC_PATHAN_KHASEEM_KHAN", "BJP_S_V_NAGENDRA_PRASAD": "BJP_S_V_NAGENDRA_PRASAD", "IND_161_MARUVA_NAGAMALLU": "IND_161_MARUVA_NAGAMALLU", "IND_161_D_RAJA_SEKHAR_REDDY": "IND_161_D_RAJA_SEKHAR_REDDY", "IND_161_GODDENDLA_VENKATESH": "IND_161_GODDENDLA_VENKATESH", "PRSHP_CHANNKA_SIDDAREDDY": "PRSHP_CHANNKA_SIDDAREDDY", "PPOI_B_RAVISANKAR": "PPOI_B_RAVISANKAR", "YSRCP_PEDDIREDDY_DWARAKANATHA_REDDY": "YSRCP_PEDDIREDDY_DWARAKANATHA_REDDY", "TDP_GULLOLA_SHANKAR": "TDP_GULLOLA_SHANKAR", "JNP_MALIPEDDI_PRABHAKAR_REDDY": "JNP_MALIPEDDI_PRABHAKAR_REDDY", "INC_M_N_CHANDRA_SEKHAR_REDDY": "INC_M_N_CHANDRA_SEKHAR_REDDY", "ILP_AP_K_GANGARAJU": "ILP_AP_K_GANGARAJU", "IND_162_MUSALIKUNTA_MASTHAN_REDDY": "IND_162_MUSALIKUNTA_MASTHAN_REDDY", "IND_162_NAGURI_VISWANATHA_REDDY": "IND_162_NAGURI_VISWANATHA_REDDY", "IND_162_MUTRA_MADHAVA_REDDY": "IND_162_MUTRA_MADHAVA_REDDY", "JD_S_P_VENKATA_REDDY": "JD_S_P_VENKATA_REDDY", "IND_162_V_ASHRAF": "IND_162_V_ASHRAF", "IUML_SEETANNAGARI_REDDEPPA": "IUML_SEETANNAGARI_REDDEPPA", "PPOI_C_VENKATARAMANA_REDDY": "PPOI_C_VENKATARAMANA_REDDY", "YSRCP_CHINTHALA_RAMACHANDRA_REDDY": "YSRCP_CHINTHALA_RAMACHANDRA_REDDY", "TDP_NALLARI_KISHAN_KUMAR_REDDY": "TDP_NALLARI_KISHAN_KUMAR_REDDY", "INC_KHATIB_SYED_AGHA_MOHIUDDIN": "INC_KHATIB_SYED_AGHA_MOHIUDDIN", "JNP_B_DINESH": "JNP_B_DINESH", "BJP_PULI_REDDY_NARENDRA_KUMAR_REDDY": "BJP_PULI_REDDY_NARENDRA_KUMAR_REDDY", "IND_163_Y_RAMANJULAMMA": "IND_163_Y_RAMANJULAMMA", "IND_163_MANGIRA_RAMACHANDRA": "IND_163_MANGIRA_RAMACHANDRA", "IND_163_APRALA_SUDHAKARA": "IND_163_APRALA_SUDHAKARA", "PRSHP_CHINTHALA_RAMI_REDDY": "PRSHP_CHINTHALA_RAMI_REDDY", "DABAP_BATHALA_VINOD_KUMAR": "DABAP_BATHALA_VINOD_KUMAR", "IND_163_A_MOSES_KIRAN_KUMAR": "IND_163_A_MOSES_KIRAN_KUMAR", "IUML_POOLA_ANWAR_HUSSAIN": "IUML_POOLA_ANWAR_HUSSAIN", "IND_163_GADA_PUSHPALATHA": "IND_163_GADA_PUSHPALATHA", "IND_163_B_PADMAJA": "IND_163_B_PADMAJA", "YSRCP_M_NAWAZ_BASHA": "YSRCP_M_NAWAZ_BASHA", "TDP_DOMMALAPATI_RAMESH": "TDP_DOMMALAPATI_RAMESH", "JNP_GANGARAPU_SWATHI": "JNP_GANGARAPU_SWATHI", "INC_D_MOHANA_RAMI_REDDY": "INC_D_MOHANA_RAMI_REDDY", "BJP_BANDI_ANAND": "BJP_BANDI_ANAND", "IND_164_RATAKONDA_RAVINDRA_NAIDU": "IND_164_RATAKONDA_RAVINDRA_NAIDU", "IND_164_B_SREERAMULU": "IND_164_B_SREERAMULU", "IND_164_RAJESH_KUMAR_JANGALA": "IND_164_RAJESH_KUMAR_JANGALA", "IND_164_SHAIK_G_NAWAJ_HUSSAIN": "IND_164_SHAIK_G_NAWAJ_HUSSAIN", "IND_164_S_KHAJAPEER": "IND_164_S_KHAJAPEER", "IND_164_BOYANA_RAMESH_BABU": "IND_164_BOYANA_RAMESH_BABU", "IND_164_MODEM_MANJUNATHA": "IND_164_MODEM_MANJUNATHA", "IND_164_PULLAGURA_VENKATA_SIVA_RAJ_KUMAR": "IND_164_PULLAGURA_VENKATA_SIVA_RAJ_KUMAR", "IND_164_CHIPPILI_JAGANATHA_REDDY": "IND_164_CHIPPILI_JAGANATHA_REDDY", "IND_164_BOKYA_RAJASHEKHAR_NAICK": "IND_164_BOKYA_RAJASHEKHAR_NAICK", "NATWOMP_V_MANJULA": "NATWOMP_V_MANJULA", "IND_164_GINKA_ANANDA_KUMAR": "IND_164_GINKA_ANANDA_KUMAR", "PPOI_K_NAGA_BHUSHANAM": "PPOI_K_NAGA_BHUSHANAM", "IUML_SABEERA_SHAIK": "IUML_SABEERA_SHAIK", "YSRCP_PEDDIREDDI_RAMACHANDRA_REDDY": "YSRCP_PEDDIREDDI_RAMACHANDRA_REDDY", "TDP_N_ANESHA_REDDY": "TDP_N_ANESHA_REDDY", "JNP_BODE_RAMACHANDRA_YADAV": "JNP_BODE_RAMACHANDRA_YADAV", "INC_S_SAFIYA": "INC_S_SAFIYA", "BJP_GANNA_MADAN_MOHAN_BABU": "BJP_GANNA_MADAN_MOHAN_BABU", "IND_165_G_T_NARAYANA": "IND_165_G_T_NARAYANA", "IND_165_P_MUNIRATHNAM": "IND_165_P_MUNIRATHNAM", "IND_165_V_PATTABI": "IND_165_V_PATTABI", "PPOI_ADIVIPALLI_KRISHNAPPA": "PPOI_ADIVIPALLI_KRISHNAPPA", "YSRCP_DR_CHEVIREDDY_BHASKAR_REDDY": "YSRCP_DR_CHEVIREDDY_BHASKAR_REDDY", "TDP_PULLIVARTHI_VENKATA_MANI_PRASAD_NANI": "TDP_PULLIVARTHI_VENKATA_MANI_PRASAD_NANI", "JNP_SHITTI_SURENDRA": "JNP_SHITTI_SURENDRA", "INC_K_P_S_VASU": "INC_K_P_S_VASU", "BJP_DR_T_MADHU_BABU": "BJP_DR_T_MADHU_BABU", "IND_166_DR_PANDRETI_SIVA_KUMAR": "IND_166_DR_PANDRETI_SIVA_KUMAR", "DABAP_A_KIRAN_KUMAR": "DABAP_A_KIRAN_KUMAR", "IND_166_J_RAMESH_BABU": "IND_166_J_RAMESH_BABU", "IND_166_HARISH_NANI": "IND_166_HARISH_NANI", "IND_166_M_CHENGALRAYULU": "IND_166_M_CHENGALRAYULU", "IND_166_PALADUGU_SURESH": "IND_166_PALADUGU_SURESH", "IND_166_R_MOHANA": "IND_166_R_MOHANA", "IND_166_G_MUTHYALU": "IND_166_G_MUTHYALU", "VCK_BANDI_RAMESH_BABU": "VCK_BANDI_RAMESH_BABU", "IND_166_KANANGI_ESWAR_GOUD": "IND_166_KANANGI_ESWAR_GOUD", "MDSP_GURRAM_KONDA_FAROOQ": "MDSP_GURRAM_KONDA_FAROOQ", "JMMMP_D_BHARATH_KUMAR": "JMMMP_D_BHARATH_KUMAR", "IND_166_G_NAGENDRA_BABU": "IND_166_G_NAGENDRA_BABU", "IND_166_KALIMILI_POORNIMA": "IND_166_KALIMILI_POORNIMA", "IND_166_KONERU_BHASKAR_REDDY": "IND_166_KONERU_BHASKAR_REDDY", "JHUP_MUNEESWAR_BODAGALA": "JHUP_MUNEESWAR_BODAGALA", "NAVAP_B_LALITHA": "NAVAP_B_LALITHA", "YSRCP_BHUMANA_KARUNAKAR_REDDY": "YSRCP_BHUMANA_KARUNAKAR_REDDY", "TDP_M_SUGUNA": "TDP_M_SUGUNA", "JNP_CHADALAWADA_KRISHNAMURTHY": "JNP_CHADALAWADA_KRISHNAMURTHY", "INC_K_PRAMILA": "INC_K_PRAMILA", "BJP_BHAVANI_SANKAR_VALLAMCHETTY": "BJP_BHAVANI_SANKAR_VALLAMCHETTY", "JPD_KESARI_SWAPNA": "JPD_KESARI_SWAPNA", "IND_167_P_SAI_PRASANNA_KUMAR": "IND_167_P_SAI_PRASANNA_KUMAR", "IND_167_DR_BODAGALA_VENKATA_RAJARAO": "IND_167_DR_BODAGALA_VENKATA_RAJARAO", "IND_167_ANANDA_HARI_KRISHNA": "IND_167_ANANDA_HARI_KRISHNA", "IND_167_K_VIJAY_KIRAN": "IND_167_K_VIJAY_KIRAN", "VCK_MINCHALA_VENKATARATNAMMA": "VCK_MINCHALA_VENKATARATNAMMA", "IND_167_KATARI_KESAVULU_CHETTY": "IND_167_KATARI_KESAVULU_CHETTY", "IND_167_E_CHENNAKESAVULU": "IND_167_E_CHENNAKESAVULU", "JHUP_T_NARASIMHA_RAO": "JHUP_T_NARASIMHA_RAO", "IND_167_R_KRISHNA_CHAITANYA": "IND_167_R_KRISHNA_CHAITANYA", "YSRCP_BIYYAPU_MADHUSUDHAN_REDDY": "YSRCP_BIYYAPU_MADHUSUDHAN_REDDY", "TDP_BOJJALA_VENKATA_SUDHIR_REDDY": "TDP_BOJJALA_VENKATA_SUDHIR_REDDY", "JNP_VINITHA_NAGARAM": "JNP_VINITHA_NAGARAM", "BJP_ANANDHA_KUMAR_KOLA": "BJP_ANANDHA_KUMAR_KOLA", "INC_S_BATHAIAH_NAIDU": "INC_S_BATHAIAH_NAIDU", "PRSHP_KASUMURI_CHIRANJEEVI": "PRSHP_KASUMURI_CHIRANJEEVI", "NPRP_RAMESH_GANUGAPENTA": "NPRP_RAMESH_GANUGAPENTA", "IND_168_SINGAMALA_SUBRAMANYAM": "IND_168_SINGAMALA_SUBRAMANYAM", "SMFB_SAMA_RAVI_CHANDRA": "SMFB_SAMA_RAVI_CHANDRA", "IND_168_VENKATESH_G": "IND_168_VENKATESH_G", "IND_168_BALASUBRAMANYAM_E": "IND_168_BALASUBRAMANYAM_E", "IND_168_PATHIPATI_NAGESWARARAO": "IND_168_PATHIPATI_NAGESWARARAO", "PPOI_S_SATYANARAYANA": "PPOI_S_SATYANARAYANA", "IND_168_YELLAIAH_C": "IND_168_YELLAIAH_C", "IND_168_GIRI_D": "IND_168_GIRI_D", "YSRCP_ADIMULAM_KONETI": "YSRCP_ADIMULAM_KONETI", "TDP_JADDA_RAJASEKHAR": "TDP_JADDA_RAJASEKHAR", "INC_CHANDRASEKHAR_PENUBALA": "INC_CHANDRASEKHAR_PENUBALA", "BSP_N_VIJAY_KUMAR": "BSP_N_VIJAY_KUMAR", "BJP_VENKATAIAH_S": "BJP_VENKATAIAH_S", "IND_169_VATAMBETI_YUGANDHAR": "IND_169_VATAMBETI_YUGANDHAR", "IND_169_B_BABU": "IND_169_B_BABU", "VCK_M_PRABHU": "VCK_M_PRABHU", "IND_169_KOMMALAPUDI_NAGARAJU": "IND_169_KOMMALAPUDI_NAGARAJU", "IND_169_VADDIGALA_LOKESULU": "IND_169_VADDIGALA_LOKESULU", "IND_169_EMSURAJAN": "IND_169_EMSURAJAN", "JPD_P_VIVEK_KUMAR": "JPD_P_VIVEK_KUMAR", "YSRCP_R_K_ROJA": "YSRCP_R_K_ROJA", "TDP_GALI_BHANU_PRAKASH": "TDP_GALI_BHANU_PRAKASH", "INC_POCHAREDDY_RAKESH_REDDY": "INC_POCHAREDDY_RAKESH_REDDY", "BSP_NAGANABOYINA_PRAVALLIKA": "BSP_NAGANABOYINA_PRAVALLIKA", "BJP_NISHIDHA_M": "BJP_NISHIDHA_M", "JMMMP_APPANI_NIRANJAN_REDDY": "JMMMP_APPANI_NIRANJAN_REDDY", "IND_170_R_GNANAPRAKASH": "IND_170_R_GNANAPRAKASH", "IND_170_K_DHANASEKHAR_CHETTY": "IND_170_K_DHANASEKHAR_CHETTY", "IND_170_P_JAYARAMAIAH": "IND_170_P_JAYARAMAIAH", "IND_170_ECHA_VINAYAKAM": "IND_170_ECHA_VINAYAKAM", "IND_170_A_CHITTI_BABU": "IND_170_A_CHITTI_BABU", "IND_170_B_DILLI_BAABU": "IND_170_B_DILLI_BAABU", "YSRCP_K_NARAYANA_SWAMY": "YSRCP_K_NARAYANA_SWAMY", "TDP_ANAGANTI_HARIKRISHNA": "TDP_ANAGANTI_HARIKRISHNA", "JNP_DR_UGANDHAR_P": "JNP_DR_UGANDHAR_P", "INC_DR_SODEM_NARASIMHULU": "INC_DR_SODEM_NARASIMHULU", "BJP_V_RAJENDRAN": "BJP_V_RAJENDRAN", "MPP_PALLIPATTU_ABHINAV_VISHNU": "MPP_PALLIPATTU_ABHINAV_VISHNU", "IND_171_CHENJI_MADHU_BABU": "IND_171_CHENJI_MADHU_BABU", "ANC_G_PALANI": "ANC_G_PALANI", "IND_171_N_RAJESH": "IND_171_N_RAJESH", "JHUP_PERURU_RAMAIAH": "JHUP_PERURU_RAMAIAH", "IND_171_K_CHINNABBA": "IND_171_K_CHINNABBA", "YSRCP_ARANII_SRENEVASULU_JANGALAPALLI": "YSRCP_ARANII_SRENEVASULU_JANGALAPALLI", "TDP_A_S_MANOHAR": "TDP_A_S_MANOHAR", "JNP_N_DAYARAM": "JNP_N_DAYARAM", "INC_G_TIKARAM_TIKKI_ROYAL": "INC_G_TIKARAM_TIKKI_ROYAL", "BJP_ADVOCATE_JAYA_KUMAR_V": "BJP_ADVOCATE_JAYA_KUMAR_V", "IND_172_E_RAMESH": "IND_172_E_RAMESH", "PPOI_BABU_BALAKRISHNA_S": "PPOI_BABU_BALAKRISHNA_S", "JHUP_A_SURESH": "JHUP_A_SURESH", "IND_172_K_PRABHAKAR_REDDY": "IND_172_K_PRABHAKAR_REDDY", "IND_172_A_SRINIVASULU": "IND_172_A_SRINIVASULU", "IND_172_S_NAGARAJU": "IND_172_S_NAGARAJU", "YSRCP_M_BABU": "YSRCP_M_BABU", "TDP_LALITHA_KUMARI": "TDP_LALITHA_KUMARI", "BSP_MOTUKUR_JAGAPATHI": "BSP_MOTUKUR_JAGAPATHI", "INC_G_CHITTI_BABU": "INC_G_CHITTI_BABU", "BJP_BANU_PRAKASH_L": "BJP_BANU_PRAKASH_L", "VCK_KOMMITTA_DHANAMJAYA_RAO": "VCK_KOMMITTA_DHANAMJAYA_RAO", "MPP_A_PURUSHOTHAM": "MPP_A_PURUSHOTHAM", "IND_173_RANGA_ROHITH": "IND_173_RANGA_ROHITH", "IND_173_A_RAJENDRAN": "IND_173_A_RAJENDRAN", "IND_173_R_RAJA": "IND_173_R_RAJA", "YSRCP_N_VENKATE_GOWDA": "YSRCP_N_VENKATE_GOWDA", "TDP_AMARNATHA_REDDY_N": "TDP_AMARNATHA_REDDY_N", "JNP_SRIKANT_NAIDU": "JNP_SRIKANT_NAIDU", "INC_THIPPI_REDDYGARI_PARTHASARADHI_REDDY": "INC_THIPPI_REDDYGARI_PARTHASARADHI_REDDY", "BJP_P_C_ESWAR_REDDY": "BJP_P_C_ESWAR_REDDY", "PRSHP_N_VENKATRAMANA": "PRSHP_N_VENKATRAMANA", "VCK_N_SRIEENIVASULU": "VCK_N_SRIEENIVASULU", "IND_174_K_SURESH": "IND_174_K_SURESH", "IND_174_B_S_MOHAN": "IND_174_B_S_MOHAN", "IND_174_N_K_ABDULLA": "IND_174_N_K_ABDULLA", "TDP_NARA_CHANDRA_BABU_NAIDU": "TDP_NARA_CHANDRA_BABU_NAIDU", "YSRCP_KRISHNA_CHANDRA_MOULI": "YSRCP_KRISHNA_CHANDRA_MOULI", "INC_SURESH_DR_B_R_SURESH_BABU": "INC_SURESH_DR_B_R_SURESH_BABU", "JNP_VENKATARAMANA_MUDDHINENI": "JNP_VENKATARAMANA_MUDDHINENI", "BJP_N_S_THULASINATH": "BJP_N_S_THULASINATH", "IND_175_DR_T_P_SURYA_CHANDRA_RAO": "IND_175_DR_T_P_SURYA_CHANDRA_RAO", "VCK_C_GANESH": "VCK_C_GANESH", "IND_175_S_SATHISH": "IND_175_S_SATHISH", "IND_175_PADMAJA_K": "IND_175_PADMAJA_K"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 175, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-13T00:49:10.643577", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.43, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.324, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.656, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.664, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.43, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.43, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.324, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.324, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.563, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.527, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 175}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "19d619e53a0849a79de6478269de0672", "name": "Nepal 2022 other (overnight nepal_2022_provincial.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Nepal", "year": 2022, "election_type": "other", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://result.election.gov.np/JSONFiles/ElectionResultState2079.txt", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"province": "province", "nepali_congress": "nepali_congress", "cpn_uml": "cpn_uml", "cpn_maoist_centre": "cpn_maoist_centre", "cpn_unified_socialist": "cpn_unified_socialist", "rastriya_prajatantra": "rastriya_prajatantra", "janata_samajwadi": "janata_samajwadi", "loktantrik_samajwadi": "loktantrik_samajwadi", "nagarik_unmukti": "nagarik_unmukti", "janamat": "janamat", "rastriya_janamorcha": "rastriya_janamorcha", "nepal_mazdoor_kisan": "nepal_mazdoor_kisan", "independent_333200": "independent_333200", "independent_333207": "independent_333207", "independent_333219": "independent_333219", "independent_333236": "independent_333236", "independent_333249": "independent_333249", "independent_333263": "independent_333263", "independent_333265": "independent_333265", "independent_333267": "independent_333267", "independent_333279": "independent_333279", "independent_333280": "independent_333280", "independent_333296": "independent_333296", "independent_333305": "independent_333305", "independent_333307": "independent_333307", "independent_333308": "independent_333308", "independent_333312": "independent_333312", "independent_333315": "independent_333315", "independent_333327": "independent_333327", "independent_333328": "independent_333328", "independent_333340": "independent_333340", "independent_333344": "independent_333344", "independent_333348": "independent_333348", "independent_333349": "independent_333349", "independent_333352": "independent_333352", "independent_333358": "independent_333358", "independent_333368": "independent_333368", "independent_333372": "independent_333372", "independent_333376": "independent_333376", "independent_333379": "independent_333379", "independent_333386": "independent_333386", "independent_333397": "independent_333397", "independent_333406": "independent_333406", "independent_333407": "independent_333407", "independent_333419": "independent_333419", "independent_333422": "independent_333422", "independent_333423": "independent_333423", "independent_333431": "independent_333431", "independent_333444": "independent_333444", "independent_333450": "independent_333450", "independent_333458": "independent_333458", "independent_333478": "independent_333478", "independent_333492": "independent_333492", "independent_333513": "independent_333513", "independent_333515": "independent_333515", "independent_333517": "independent_333517", "independent_333526": "independent_333526", "independent_333529": "independent_333529", "independent_333532": "independent_333532", "independent_333535": "independent_333535", "independent_333553": "independent_333553", "independent_333566": "independent_333566", "independent_333578": "independent_333578", "independent_333587": "independent_333587", "independent_333589": "independent_333589", "independent_333598": "independent_333598", "independent_333603": "independent_333603", "independent_333604": "independent_333604", "independent_333606": "independent_333606", "independent_333618": "independent_333618", "independent_333626": "independent_333626", "independent_333632": "independent_333632", "independent_333639": "independent_333639", "independent_333642": "independent_333642", "independent_333645": "independent_333645", "independent_333654": "independent_333654", "independent_333663": "independent_333663", "independent_333671": "independent_333671", "independent_333672": "independent_333672", "independent_333674": "independent_333674", "independent_333679": "independent_333679", "independent_333685": "independent_333685", "independent_333687": "independent_333687", "independent_333689": "independent_333689", "independent_333691": "independent_333691", "independent_333692": "independent_333692", "independent_333699": "independent_333699", "independent_333704": "independent_333704", "independent_333711": "independent_333711", "independent_333719": "independent_333719", "independent_333720": "independent_333720", "independent_333725": "independent_333725", "independent_333726": "independent_333726", "independent_333731": "independent_333731", "independent_333737": "independent_333737", "independent_333740": "independent_333740", "independent_333741": "independent_333741", "independent_333747": "independent_333747", "independent_333750": "independent_333750", "independent_333752": "independent_333752", "independent_333757": "independent_333757", "independent_333758": "independent_333758", "independent_333780": "independent_333780", "independent_333788": "independent_333788", "independent_333792": "independent_333792", "independent_333795": "independent_333795", "independent_333800": "independent_333800", "independent_333804": "independent_333804", "independent_333806": "independent_333806", "independent_333814": "independent_333814", "independent_333816": "independent_333816", "independent_333817": "independent_333817", "independent_333835": "independent_333835", "independent_333837": "independent_333837", "independent_333842": "independent_333842", "independent_333844": "independent_333844", "independent_333858": "independent_333858", "independent_333871": "independent_333871", "independent_333872": "independent_333872", "independent_333875": "independent_333875", "independent_333884": "independent_333884", "independent_333888": "independent_333888", "independent_333890": "independent_333890", "independent_333892": "independent_333892", "independent_333896": "independent_333896", "independent_333902": "independent_333902", "independent_333907": "independent_333907", "independent_333911": "independent_333911", "independent_333916": "independent_333916", "independent_333919": "independent_333919", "independent_333941": "independent_333941", "independent_333954": "independent_333954", "independent_333957": "independent_333957", "independent_333966": "independent_333966", "independent_333967": "independent_333967", "independent_333974": "independent_333974", "independent_333975": "independent_333975", "independent_333992": "independent_333992", "independent_333995": "independent_333995", "independent_334003": "independent_334003", "independent_334005": "independent_334005", "independent_334015": "independent_334015", "independent_334024": "independent_334024", "independent_334034": "independent_334034", "independent_334040": "independent_334040", "independent_334044": "independent_334044", "independent_334045": "independent_334045", "independent_334050": "independent_334050", "independent_334057": "independent_334057", "independent_334062": "independent_334062", "independent_334068": "independent_334068", "independent_334101": "independent_334101", "independent_334106": "independent_334106", "independent_334111": "independent_334111", "independent_334129": "independent_334129", "independent_334133": "independent_334133", "independent_334134": "independent_334134", "independent_334145": "independent_334145", "independent_334156": "independent_334156", "independent_334180": "independent_334180", "independent_334186": "independent_334186", "independent_334188": "independent_334188", "independent_334190": "independent_334190", "independent_334195": "independent_334195", "independent_334199": "independent_334199", "independent_334212": "independent_334212", "independent_334214": "independent_334214", "independent_334215": "independent_334215", "independent_334220": "independent_334220", "independent_334223": "independent_334223", "independent_334224": "independent_334224", "independent_334227": "independent_334227", "independent_334232": "independent_334232", "independent_334243": "independent_334243", "independent_334245": "independent_334245", "independent_334262": "independent_334262", "independent_334265": "independent_334265", "independent_334268": "independent_334268", "independent_334272": "independent_334272", "independent_334279": "independent_334279", "independent_334285": "independent_334285", "independent_334286": "independent_334286", "independent_334307": "independent_334307", "independent_334311": "independent_334311", "independent_334312": "independent_334312", "independent_334314": "independent_334314", "independent_334315": "independent_334315", "independent_334327": "independent_334327", "independent_334330": "independent_334330", "independent_334338": "independent_334338", "independent_334342": "independent_334342", "independent_334345": "independent_334345", "independent_334347": "independent_334347", "independent_334351": "independent_334351", "independent_334354": "independent_334354", "independent_334355": "independent_334355", "independent_334356": "independent_334356", "independent_334359": "independent_334359", "independent_334372": "independent_334372", "independent_334376": "independent_334376", "independent_334378": "independent_334378", "independent_334379": "independent_334379", "independent_334387": "independent_334387", "independent_334389": "independent_334389", "independent_334395": "independent_334395", "independent_334399": "independent_334399", "independent_334400": "independent_334400", "independent_334405": "independent_334405", "independent_334406": "independent_334406", "independent_334407": "independent_334407", "independent_334409": "independent_334409", "independent_334414": "independent_334414", "independent_334417": "independent_334417", "independent_334422": "independent_334422", "independent_334429": "independent_334429", "independent_334434": "independent_334434", "independent_334436": "independent_334436", "independent_334437": "independent_334437", "independent_334439": "independent_334439", "independent_334441": "independent_334441", "independent_334447": "independent_334447", "independent_334448": "independent_334448", "independent_334453": "independent_334453", "independent_334458": "independent_334458", "independent_334460": "independent_334460", "independent_334462": "independent_334462", "independent_334474": "independent_334474", "independent_334480": "independent_334480", "independent_334483": "independent_334483", "independent_334485": "independent_334485", "independent_334508": "independent_334508", "independent_334518": "independent_334518", "independent_334523": "independent_334523", "independent_334527": "independent_334527", "independent_334528": "independent_334528", "independent_334530": "independent_334530", "independent_334540": "independent_334540", "independent_334543": "independent_334543", "independent_334551": "independent_334551", "independent_334562": "independent_334562", "independent_334565": "independent_334565", "independent_334587": "independent_334587", "independent_334589": "independent_334589", "independent_334610": "independent_334610", "independent_334613": "independent_334613", "independent_334616": "independent_334616", "independent_334623": "independent_334623", "independent_334624": "independent_334624", "independent_334625": "independent_334625", "independent_334627": "independent_334627", "independent_334628": "independent_334628", "independent_334657": "independent_334657", "independent_334668": "independent_334668", "independent_334671": "independent_334671", "independent_334672": "independent_334672", "independent_334674": "independent_334674", "independent_334682": "independent_334682", "independent_334694": "independent_334694", "independent_334696": "independent_334696", "independent_334704": "independent_334704", "independent_334708": "independent_334708", "independent_334711": "independent_334711", "independent_334723": "independent_334723", "independent_334725": "independent_334725", "independent_334733": "independent_334733", "independent_334736": "independent_334736", "independent_334741": "independent_334741", "independent_334746": "independent_334746", "independent_334748": "independent_334748", "independent_334761": "independent_334761", "independent_334764": "independent_334764", "independent_334765": "independent_334765", "independent_334780": "independent_334780", "independent_334798": "independent_334798", "independent_334803": "independent_334803", "independent_334810": "independent_334810", "independent_334812": "independent_334812", "independent_334817": "independent_334817", "independent_334824": "independent_334824", "independent_334837": "independent_334837", "independent_334850": "independent_334850", "independent_334859": "independent_334859", "independent_334860": "independent_334860", "independent_334862": "independent_334862", "independent_334867": "independent_334867", "independent_334876": "independent_334876", "independent_334879": "independent_334879", "independent_334903": "independent_334903", "independent_334908": "independent_334908", "independent_334911": "independent_334911", "independent_334914": "independent_334914", "independent_334926": "independent_334926", "independent_334928": "independent_334928", "independent_334935": "independent_334935", "independent_334942": "independent_334942", "independent_334949": "independent_334949", "independent_334961": "independent_334961", "independent_334963": "independent_334963", "independent_334964": "independent_334964", "independent_334976": "independent_334976", "independent_334978": "independent_334978", "independent_334981": "independent_334981", "independent_334983": "independent_334983", "independent_334994": "independent_334994", "independent_334999": "independent_334999", "independent_335000": "independent_335000", "independent_335001": "independent_335001", "independent_335002": "independent_335002", "independent_335018": "independent_335018", "independent_335024": "independent_335024", "independent_335025": "independent_335025", "independent_335026": "independent_335026", "independent_335030": "independent_335030", "independent_335031": "independent_335031", "independent_335032": "independent_335032", "independent_335035": "independent_335035", "independent_335037": "independent_335037", "independent_335049": "independent_335049", "independent_335050": "independent_335050", "independent_335051": "independent_335051", "independent_335060": "independent_335060", "independent_335066": "independent_335066", "independent_335068": "independent_335068", "independent_335081": "independent_335081", "independent_335083": "independent_335083", "independent_335102": "independent_335102", "independent_335112": "independent_335112", "independent_335117": "independent_335117", "independent_335120": "independent_335120", "independent_335121": "independent_335121", "independent_335126": "independent_335126", "independent_335143": "independent_335143", "independent_335144": "independent_335144", "independent_335145": "independent_335145", "independent_335150": "independent_335150", "independent_335153": "independent_335153", "independent_335158": "independent_335158", "independent_335159": "independent_335159", "independent_335161": "independent_335161", "independent_335163": "independent_335163", "independent_335198": "independent_335198", "independent_335203": "independent_335203", "independent_335204": "independent_335204", "independent_335205": "independent_335205", "independent_335209": "independent_335209", "independent_335212": "independent_335212", "independent_335216": "independent_335216", "independent_335217": "independent_335217", "independent_335244": "independent_335244", "independent_335245": "independent_335245", "independent_335248": "independent_335248", "independent_335249": "independent_335249", "independent_335277": "independent_335277", "independent_335291": "independent_335291", "independent_335295": "independent_335295", "independent_335296": "independent_335296", "independent_335302": "independent_335302", "independent_335303": "independent_335303", "independent_335305": "independent_335305", "independent_335315": "independent_335315", "independent_335319": "independent_335319", "independent_335321": "independent_335321", "independent_335326": "independent_335326", "independent_335330": "independent_335330", "independent_335345": "independent_335345", "independent_335346": "independent_335346", "independent_335348": "independent_335348", "independent_335357": "independent_335357", "independent_335375": "independent_335375", "independent_335392": "independent_335392", "independent_335403": "independent_335403", "independent_335412": "independent_335412", "independent_335415": "independent_335415", "independent_335420": "independent_335420", "independent_335421": "independent_335421", "independent_335428": "independent_335428", "independent_335437": "independent_335437", "independent_335443": "independent_335443", "independent_335446": "independent_335446", "independent_335453": "independent_335453", "independent_335459": "independent_335459", "independent_335463": "independent_335463", "independent_335468": "independent_335468", "independent_335476": "independent_335476", "independent_335479": "independent_335479", "independent_335495": "independent_335495", "independent_335496": "independent_335496", "independent_335504": "independent_335504", "independent_335505": "independent_335505", "independent_335506": "independent_335506", "independent_335508": "independent_335508", "independent_335515": "independent_335515", "independent_335516": "independent_335516", "independent_335517": "independent_335517", "independent_335519": "independent_335519", "independent_335522": "independent_335522", "independent_335533": "independent_335533", "independent_335539": "independent_335539", "independent_335541": "independent_335541", "independent_335544": "independent_335544", "independent_335553": "independent_335553", "independent_335560": "independent_335560", "independent_335583": "independent_335583", "independent_335585": "independent_335585", "independent_335586": "independent_335586", "independent_335588": "independent_335588", "independent_335589": "independent_335589", "independent_335598": "independent_335598", "independent_335602": "independent_335602", "independent_335613": "independent_335613", "independent_335614": "independent_335614", "independent_335617": "independent_335617", "independent_335622": "independent_335622", "independent_335626": "independent_335626", "independent_335631": "independent_335631", "independent_335636": "independent_335636", "independent_335640": "independent_335640", "independent_335641": "independent_335641", "independent_335652": "independent_335652", "independent_335653": "independent_335653", "independent_335656": "independent_335656", "independent_335658": "independent_335658", "independent_335660": "independent_335660", "independent_335666": "independent_335666", "independent_335667": "independent_335667", "independent_335670": "independent_335670", "independent_335675": "independent_335675", "independent_335696": "independent_335696", "independent_335698": "independent_335698", "independent_335703": "independent_335703", "independent_335715": "independent_335715", "independent_335727": "independent_335727", "independent_335728": "independent_335728", "independent_335734": "independent_335734", "independent_335742": "independent_335742", "independent_335744": "independent_335744", "independent_335747": "independent_335747", "independent_335749": "independent_335749", "independent_335773": "independent_335773", "independent_335774": "independent_335774", "independent_335779": "independent_335779", "independent_335782": "independent_335782", "independent_335787": "independent_335787", "independent_335792": "independent_335792", "independent_335795": "independent_335795", "independent_335812": "independent_335812", "independent_335824": "independent_335824", "independent_335837": "independent_335837", "independent_335848": "independent_335848", "independent_335856": "independent_335856", "independent_335861": "independent_335861", "independent_335871": "independent_335871", "independent_335876": "independent_335876", "independent_335879": "independent_335879", "independent_335881": "independent_335881", "independent_335896": "independent_335896", "independent_335902": "independent_335902", "independent_335907": "independent_335907", "independent_335910": "independent_335910", "independent_335912": "independent_335912", "independent_335915": "independent_335915", "independent_335929": "independent_335929", "independent_335932": "independent_335932", "independent_335934": "independent_335934", "independent_335938": "independent_335938", "independent_335941": "independent_335941", "independent_335950": "independent_335950", "independent_335961": "independent_335961", "independent_335965": "independent_335965", "independent_335970": "independent_335970", "independent_335976": "independent_335976", "independent_335980": "independent_335980", "independent_335985": "independent_335985", "independent_335992": "independent_335992", "independent_335994": "independent_335994", "independent_336003": "independent_336003", "independent_336005": "independent_336005", "independent_336009": "independent_336009", "independent_336013": "independent_336013", "independent_336014": "independent_336014", "independent_336015": "independent_336015", "independent_336026": "independent_336026", "independent_336031": "independent_336031", "independent_336035": "independent_336035", "independent_336040": "independent_336040", "independent_336041": "independent_336041", "independent_336059": "independent_336059", "independent_336063": "independent_336063", "independent_336065": "independent_336065", "independent_336073": "independent_336073", "independent_336078": "independent_336078", "independent_336085": "independent_336085", "independent_336100": "independent_336100", "independent_336101": "independent_336101", "independent_336108": "independent_336108", "independent_336126": "independent_336126", "independent_336130": "independent_336130", "independent_336136": "independent_336136", "independent_336142": "independent_336142", "independent_336150": "independent_336150", "independent_336158": "independent_336158", "independent_336161": "independent_336161", "independent_336162": "independent_336162", "independent_336181": "independent_336181", "independent_336188": "independent_336188", "independent_336189": "independent_336189", "independent_336199": "independent_336199", "independent_336205": "independent_336205", "independent_336207": "independent_336207", "independent_336211": "independent_336211", "independent_336227": "independent_336227", "independent_336229": "independent_336229", "independent_336232": "independent_336232", "independent_336253": "independent_336253", "independent_336254": "independent_336254", "independent_336255": "independent_336255", "independent_336261": "independent_336261", "independent_336262": "independent_336262", "independent_336272": "independent_336272", "independent_336276": "independent_336276", "independent_336279": "independent_336279", "independent_336282": "independent_336282", "independent_336299": "independent_336299", "independent_336305": "independent_336305", "independent_336314": "independent_336314", "independent_336327": "independent_336327", "independent_336329": "independent_336329", "independent_336335": "independent_336335", "independent_336340": "independent_336340", "independent_336342": "independent_336342", "independent_336355": "independent_336355", "independent_336356": "independent_336356", "independent_336362": "independent_336362", "independent_336366": "independent_336366", "independent_336367": "independent_336367", "independent_336368": "independent_336368", "independent_336376": "independent_336376", "independent_336386": "independent_336386", "independent_336387": "independent_336387", "independent_336402": "independent_336402", "independent_336406": "independent_336406", "independent_336424": "independent_336424", "independent_336429": "independent_336429", "independent_336432": "independent_336432", "independent_336434": "independent_336434", "independent_336438": "independent_336438", "independent_336453": "independent_336453", "independent_336454": "independent_336454", "independent_336461": "independent_336461", "independent_336471": "independent_336471", "independent_336483": "independent_336483", "independent_336487": "independent_336487", "independent_336488": "independent_336488", "independent_336495": "independent_336495", "independent_336496": "independent_336496", "independent_336501": "independent_336501", "independent_336506": "independent_336506", "independent_336507": "independent_336507", "independent_336510": "independent_336510", "independent_336520": "independent_336520", "independent_336523": "independent_336523", "independent_336543": "independent_336543", "independent_336546": "independent_336546", "independent_336558": "independent_336558", "independent_336560": "independent_336560", "independent_336566": "independent_336566", "independent_336569": "independent_336569", "independent_336575": "independent_336575", "independent_336586": "independent_336586", "independent_336587": "independent_336587", "independent_336590": "independent_336590", "independent_336608": "independent_336608", "independent_336609": "independent_336609", "independent_336612": "independent_336612", "independent_336617": "independent_336617", "independent_336620": "independent_336620", "independent_336625": "independent_336625", "independent_336635": "independent_336635", "independent_336654": "independent_336654", "independent_336656": "independent_336656", "independent_336659": "independent_336659", "independent_336665": "independent_336665", "independent_336667": "independent_336667", "independent_336675": "independent_336675", "independent_336679": "independent_336679", "independent_336681": "independent_336681", "independent_336688": "independent_336688", "independent_336696": "independent_336696", "independent_336719": "independent_336719", "independent_336722": "independent_336722", "independent_336728": "independent_336728", "independent_336730": "independent_336730", "independent_336733": "independent_336733", "independent_336736": "independent_336736", "independent_336738": "independent_336738", "independent_336749": "independent_336749", "independent_336751": "independent_336751", "independent_336757": "independent_336757", "independent_336760": "independent_336760", "independent_336765": "independent_336765", "independent_336766": "independent_336766", "independent_336770": "independent_336770", "independent_336771": "independent_336771", "independent_336789": "independent_336789", "independent_336792": "independent_336792", "independent_336795": "independent_336795", "independent_336796": "independent_336796", "independent_336806": "independent_336806", "independent_336809": "independent_336809", "independent_336814": "independent_336814", "independent_336816": "independent_336816", "independent_336817": "independent_336817", "independent_336819": "independent_336819", "independent_336823": "independent_336823", "independent_336830": "independent_336830", "independent_336839": "independent_336839", "independent_336860": "independent_336860", "independent_336872": "independent_336872", "independent_336874": "independent_336874", "independent_336883": "independent_336883", "independent_336885": "independent_336885", "independent_336889": "independent_336889", "independent_336898": "independent_336898", "independent_336916": "independent_336916", "independent_336918": "independent_336918", "independent_336920": "independent_336920", "independent_336921": "independent_336921", "independent_336926": "independent_336926", "independent_336931": "independent_336931", "independent_336936": "independent_336936", "independent_336939": "independent_336939", "independent_336940": "independent_336940", "independent_336948": "independent_336948", "independent_336955": "independent_336955", "independent_336959": "independent_336959", "independent_336967": "independent_336967", "independent_336968": "independent_336968", "independent_336970": "independent_336970", "independent_336973": "independent_336973", "independent_336978": "independent_336978", "independent_336979": "independent_336979", "independent_336980": "independent_336980", "independent_336981": "independent_336981", "independent_336984": "independent_336984", "independent_336985": "independent_336985", "independent_336991": "independent_336991", "independent_336994": "independent_336994", "independent_337000": "independent_337000", "independent_337014": "independent_337014", "independent_337017": "independent_337017", "independent_337020": "independent_337020", "independent_337024": "independent_337024", "independent_337026": "independent_337026", "independent_337029": "independent_337029", "independent_337036": "independent_337036", "independent_337037": "independent_337037", "independent_337040": "independent_337040", "independent_337042": "independent_337042", "independent_337051": "independent_337051", "independent_337060": "independent_337060", "independent_337068": "independent_337068", "independent_337070": "independent_337070", "independent_337073": "independent_337073", "independent_337085": "independent_337085", "independent_337093": "independent_337093", "independent_337095": "independent_337095", "independent_337100": "independent_337100", "independent_337104": "independent_337104", "independent_337105": "independent_337105", "independent_337117": "independent_337117", "independent_337118": "independent_337118", "independent_337139": "independent_337139", "independent_337147": "independent_337147", "independent_337163": "independent_337163", "independent_337169": "independent_337169", "independent_337172": "independent_337172", "independent_337180": "independent_337180", "independent_337186": "independent_337186", "independent_337188": "independent_337188", "independent_337189": "independent_337189", "independent_337192": "independent_337192", "independent_337195": "independent_337195", "independent_337202": "independent_337202", "independent_337205": "independent_337205", "independent_337212": "independent_337212", "independent_337215": "independent_337215", "independent_337222": "independent_337222", "independent_337223": "independent_337223", "independent_337228": "independent_337228", "independent_337230": "independent_337230", "independent_337233": "independent_337233", "independent_337235": "independent_337235", "independent_337238": "independent_337238", "independent_337241": "independent_337241", "independent_337245": "independent_337245", "independent_337249": "independent_337249", "independent_337250": "independent_337250", "independent_337254": "independent_337254", "independent_337256": "independent_337256", "independent_337260": "independent_337260", "independent_337261": "independent_337261", "independent_337264": "independent_337264", "independent_337265": "independent_337265", "independent_337267": "independent_337267", "independent_337274": "independent_337274", "independent_337280": "independent_337280", "independent_337284": "independent_337284", "independent_337287": "independent_337287", "independent_337295": "independent_337295", "independent_337296": "independent_337296", "independent_337299": "independent_337299", "independent_337306": "independent_337306", "independent_337311": "independent_337311", "independent_337312": "independent_337312", "independent_337316": "independent_337316", "independent_337317": "independent_337317", "independent_337330": "independent_337330", "independent_337331": "independent_337331", "independent_337340": "independent_337340", "independent_337348": "independent_337348", "independent_337349": "independent_337349", "independent_337352": "independent_337352", "independent_337382": "independent_337382", "independent_337383": "independent_337383", "independent_337389": "independent_337389", "independent_337403": "independent_337403", "independent_337414": "independent_337414", "independent_337415": "independent_337415", "independent_337421": "independent_337421", "independent_337429": "independent_337429", "independent_337447": "independent_337447", "independent_337448": "independent_337448", "independent_337450": "independent_337450", "independent_337452": "independent_337452", "independent_337456": "independent_337456", "independent_337457": "independent_337457", "independent_337462": "independent_337462", "independent_337465": "independent_337465", "independent_337468": "independent_337468", "independent_337472": "independent_337472", "independent_337479": "independent_337479", "independent_337485": "independent_337485", "independent_337487": "independent_337487", "independent_337491": "independent_337491", "independent_337492": "independent_337492", "independent_337494": "independent_337494", "independent_337506": "independent_337506", "independent_337512": "independent_337512", "independent_337516": "independent_337516", "independent_337517": "independent_337517", "independent_337528": "independent_337528", "independent_337534": "independent_337534", "independent_337538": "independent_337538", "independent_337541": "independent_337541", "independent_337545": "independent_337545", "independent_337550": "independent_337550", "independent_337553": "independent_337553", "independent_337555": "independent_337555", "independent_337556": "independent_337556", "independent_337562": "independent_337562", "independent_337563": "independent_337563", "independent_337566": "independent_337566", "independent_337567": "independent_337567", "independent_337569": "independent_337569", "independent_337573": "independent_337573", "independent_337586": "independent_337586", "independent_337591": "independent_337591", "independent_337593": "independent_337593", "independent_337601": "independent_337601", "independent_337603": "independent_337603", "independent_337606": "independent_337606", "independent_337611": "independent_337611", "independent_337618": "independent_337618", "independent_337620": "independent_337620", "independent_337621": "independent_337621", "independent_337630": "independent_337630", "independent_337632": "independent_337632", "independent_337633": "independent_337633", "independent_337634": "independent_337634", "independent_337635": "independent_337635", "independent_337636": "independent_337636", "independent_337641": "independent_337641", "independent_337642": "independent_337642", "independent_337644": "independent_337644", "independent_337649": "independent_337649", "independent_337653": "independent_337653", "independent_337654": "independent_337654", "independent_337656": "independent_337656", "independent_337657": "independent_337657", "independent_337662": "independent_337662", "independent_337665": "independent_337665", "independent_337671": "independent_337671", "independent_337673": "independent_337673", "independent_337683": "independent_337683", "independent_337694": "independent_337694", "independent_337702": "independent_337702", "independent_337703": "independent_337703", "independent_337708": "independent_337708", "independent_337711": "independent_337711", "independent_337715": "independent_337715", "independent_337718": "independent_337718", "independent_337733": "independent_337733", "independent_337741": "independent_337741", "independent_337749": "independent_337749", "independent_337752": "independent_337752", "independent_337756": "independent_337756", "independent_337761": "independent_337761", "independent_337766": "independent_337766", "independent_337777": "independent_337777", "independent_337778": "independent_337778", "independent_337780": "independent_337780", "independent_337791": "independent_337791", "independent_337797": "independent_337797", "independent_337802": "independent_337802", "independent_337809": "independent_337809", "independent_337814": "independent_337814", "independent_337834": "independent_337834", "independent_337845": "independent_337845", "independent_337850": "independent_337850", "independent_337852": "independent_337852", "independent_337853": "independent_337853", "independent_337854": "independent_337854", "independent_337858": "independent_337858", "independent_337860": "independent_337860", "independent_337861": "independent_337861", "independent_337864": "independent_337864", "independent_337867": "independent_337867", "independent_337868": "independent_337868", "independent_337869": "independent_337869", "independent_337871": "independent_337871", "independent_337874": "independent_337874", "independent_337876": "independent_337876", "independent_337885": "independent_337885", "independent_337897": "independent_337897", "independent_337898": "independent_337898", "independent_337900": "independent_337900", "independent_337907": "independent_337907", "independent_337909": "independent_337909", "independent_337910": "independent_337910", "independent_337919": "independent_337919", "independent_337927": "independent_337927", "independent_337930": "independent_337930", "independent_337937": "independent_337937", "independent_337938": "independent_337938", "independent_337939": "independent_337939", "independent_337940": "independent_337940", "independent_337952": "independent_337952", "independent_337953": "independent_337953", "independent_337958": "independent_337958", "independent_337965": "independent_337965", "independent_337971": "independent_337971", "independent_337972": "independent_337972", "independent_337974": "independent_337974", "independent_337981": "independent_337981", "independent_337985": "independent_337985", "independent_337989": "independent_337989", "independent_337992": "independent_337992", "independent_337993": "independent_337993", "independent_337996": "independent_337996", "independent_338002": "independent_338002", "independent_338011": "independent_338011", "independent_338021": "independent_338021", "independent_338023": "independent_338023", "independent_338027": "independent_338027", "independent_338031": "independent_338031", "independent_338041": "independent_338041", "independent_338042": "independent_338042", "independent_338044": "independent_338044", "independent_338048": "independent_338048", "independent_338052": "independent_338052", "independent_338053": "independent_338053", "independent_338060": "independent_338060", "independent_338061": "independent_338061", "independent_338063": "independent_338063", "independent_338065": "independent_338065", "independent_338066": "independent_338066", "independent_338086": "independent_338086", "independent_338090": "independent_338090", "independent_338091": "independent_338091", "independent_338095": "independent_338095", "independent_338097": "independent_338097", "independent_338109": "independent_338109", "independent_338110": "independent_338110", "independent_338114": "independent_338114", "independent_338120": "independent_338120", "independent_338132": "independent_338132", "independent_338139": "independent_338139", "independent_338148": "independent_338148", "independent_338149": "independent_338149", "independent_338154": "independent_338154", "independent_338155": "independent_338155", "independent_338156": "independent_338156", "independent_338158": "independent_338158", "independent_338162": "independent_338162", "independent_338164": "independent_338164", "independent_338173": "independent_338173", "independent_338176": "independent_338176", "independent_338177": "independent_338177", "independent_338178": "independent_338178", "independent_338206": "independent_338206", "independent_338209": "independent_338209", "independent_338211": "independent_338211", "independent_338212": "independent_338212", "independent_338214": "independent_338214", "independent_338215": "independent_338215", "independent_338219": "independent_338219", "independent_338231": "independent_338231", "independent_338233": "independent_338233", "independent_338242": "independent_338242", "independent_338244": "independent_338244", "independent_338253": "independent_338253", "independent_338256": "independent_338256", "independent_338261": "independent_338261", "independent_338262": "independent_338262", "independent_338271": "independent_338271", "independent_338276": "independent_338276", "independent_338278": "independent_338278", "independent_338281": "independent_338281", "independent_338287": "independent_338287", "independent_338288": "independent_338288", "independent_338290": "independent_338290", "independent_338300": "independent_338300", "independent_338309": "independent_338309", "independent_338317": "independent_338317", "independent_338318": "independent_338318", "independent_338321": "independent_338321", "independent_338324": "independent_338324", "independent_338325": "independent_338325", "independent_338329": "independent_338329", "independent_338332": "independent_338332", "independent_338333": "independent_338333", "independent_338339": "independent_338339", "independent_338341": "independent_338341", "independent_338352": "independent_338352", "independent_338363": "independent_338363", "independent_338365": "independent_338365", "independent_338376": "independent_338376", "independent_338379": "independent_338379", "independent_338382": "independent_338382", "independent_338385": "independent_338385", "independent_338391": "independent_338391", "independent_338392": "independent_338392", "independent_338399": "independent_338399", "independent_338402": "independent_338402", "independent_338405": "independent_338405", "independent_338407": "independent_338407", "independent_338409": "independent_338409", "independent_338430": "independent_338430", "independent_338432": "independent_338432", "independent_338459": "independent_338459", "independent_338460": "independent_338460", "independent_338461": "independent_338461", "independent_338464": "independent_338464", "independent_338467": "independent_338467", "independent_338469": "independent_338469", "independent_338470": "independent_338470", "independent_338481": "independent_338481", "independent_338484": "independent_338484", "independent_338485": "independent_338485", "independent_338489": "independent_338489", "independent_338492": "independent_338492", "independent_338494": "independent_338494", "independent_338495": "independent_338495", "independent_338496": "independent_338496", "independent_338506": "independent_338506", "independent_338507": "independent_338507", "independent_338510": "independent_338510", "independent_338511": "independent_338511", "independent_338516": "independent_338516", "independent_338517": "independent_338517", "independent_338547": "independent_338547", "independent_338554": "independent_338554", "independent_338557": "independent_338557", "independent_338563": "independent_338563", "independent_338570": "independent_338570", "independent_338571": "independent_338571", "independent_338573": "independent_338573", "independent_338580": "independent_338580", "independent_338591": "independent_338591", "independent_338594": "independent_338594", "independent_338595": "independent_338595", "independent_338597": "independent_338597", "independent_338601": "independent_338601", "independent_338603": "independent_338603", "independent_338605": "independent_338605", "independent_338612": "independent_338612", "independent_338622": "independent_338622", "independent_338635": "independent_338635", "independent_338648": "independent_338648", "independent_338651": "independent_338651", "independent_338654": "independent_338654", "independent_338663": "independent_338663", "independent_338664": "independent_338664", "independent_338665": "independent_338665", "independent_338674": "independent_338674", "independent_338682": "independent_338682", "independent_338684": "independent_338684", "independent_338687": "independent_338687", "independent_338690": "independent_338690", "independent_338693": "independent_338693", "independent_338714": "independent_338714", "independent_338717": "independent_338717", "independent_338720": "independent_338720", "independent_338722": "independent_338722", "independent_338738": "independent_338738", "independent_338750": "independent_338750", "independent_338751": "independent_338751", "independent_338756": "independent_338756", "independent_338762": "independent_338762", "independent_338764": "independent_338764", "independent_338766": "independent_338766", "independent_338775": "independent_338775", "independent_338778": "independent_338778", "independent_338785": "independent_338785", "independent_338786": "independent_338786", "independent_338788": "independent_338788", "independent_338792": "independent_338792", "independent_338801": "independent_338801", "independent_338802": "independent_338802", "independent_338806": "independent_338806", "independent_338811": "independent_338811", "independent_338812": "independent_338812", "independent_338814": "independent_338814", "independent_338818": "independent_338818", "independent_338827": "independent_338827", "independent_338828": "independent_338828", "independent_338836": "independent_338836", "independent_338843": "independent_338843", "independent_338844": "independent_338844", "independent_338846": "independent_338846", "independent_338853": "independent_338853", "independent_338859": "independent_338859", "independent_338863": "independent_338863", "independent_338870": "independent_338870", "independent_338872": "independent_338872", "independent_338877": "independent_338877", "independent_338883": "independent_338883", "independent_338885": "independent_338885", "independent_338887": "independent_338887", "independent_338899": "independent_338899", "independent_338905": "independent_338905", "independent_338907": "independent_338907", "independent_338909": "independent_338909", "independent_338910": "independent_338910", "independent_338913": "independent_338913", "independent_338917": "independent_338917", "independent_338919": "independent_338919", "independent_338920": "independent_338920", "independent_338925": "independent_338925", "independent_338928": "independent_338928", "independent_338931": "independent_338931", "independent_338936": "independent_338936", "independent_338944": "independent_338944", "independent_338945": "independent_338945", "independent_338948": "independent_338948", "independent_338949": "independent_338949", "independent_338953": "independent_338953", "independent_338957": "independent_338957", "independent_338958": "independent_338958", "independent_338960": "independent_338960", "independent_338967": "independent_338967", "independent_338974": "independent_338974", "independent_338976": "independent_338976", "independent_338995": "independent_338995", "independent_338997": "independent_338997", "independent_339009": "independent_339009", "independent_339010": "independent_339010", "independent_339021": "independent_339021", "independent_339022": "independent_339022", "independent_339027": "independent_339027", "independent_339028": "independent_339028", "independent_339036": "independent_339036", "independent_339039": "independent_339039", "independent_339040": "independent_339040", "independent_339044": "independent_339044", "independent_339045": "independent_339045", "independent_339053": "independent_339053", "independent_339055": "independent_339055", "independent_339063": "independent_339063", "independent_339065": "independent_339065", "independent_339066": "independent_339066", "independent_339083": "independent_339083", "independent_339091": "independent_339091", "independent_339097": "independent_339097", "independent_339100": "independent_339100", "independent_339101": "independent_339101", "independent_339103": "independent_339103", "independent_339105": "independent_339105", "independent_339107": "independent_339107", "independent_339109": "independent_339109", "independent_339111": "independent_339111", "independent_339115": "independent_339115", "independent_339117": "independent_339117", "independent_339118": "independent_339118", "independent_339120": "independent_339120", "independent_339123": "independent_339123", "independent_339134": "independent_339134", "independent_339138": "independent_339138", "independent_339139": "independent_339139", "independent_339148": "independent_339148", "independent_339158": "independent_339158", "independent_339177": "independent_339177", "independent_339195": "independent_339195", "independent_339198": "independent_339198", "independent_339204": "independent_339204", "independent_339223": "independent_339223", "other": "other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 330, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 330, "registered_not_positive": 330}, "n_stations_flagged": 330, "created_at": "2026-07-13T00:48:57.906235", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.502, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.705, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.631, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.501, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.502, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.705, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.151, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.181, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.836, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.626, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.501, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.501, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.412, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.773, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.773, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.613, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.613, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 330}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "81e320a3f26a4a44b8d3e3c0ac34a379", "name": "Mongolia 2020 parliamentary (overnight mongolia_2020_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mongolia", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "29 toirog (multi-member constituencies), 2020 MNTV block-vote: each voter casts up to `mandates` candidate-votes, so party columns are candidate-vote sums and sum/ballots != turnout. Do not reconcile candidate sums against registered. Same caveat as the 2020/2024 Mongolia builds. Source: GEC gec.gov.mn.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"mandates": "mandates", "\u041c\u043e\u043d\u0433\u043e\u043b \u0410\u0440\u0434\u044b\u043d \u043d\u0430\u043c": "\u041c\u043e\u043d\u0433\u043e\u043b \u0410\u0440\u0434\u044b\u043d \u043d\u0430\u043c", "\u0410\u0440\u0434\u0447\u0438\u043b\u0441\u0430\u043d \u043d\u0430\u043c": "\u0410\u0440\u0434\u0447\u0438\u043b\u0441\u0430\u043d \u043d\u0430\u043c", "\u0411\u0438\u0435 \u0434\u0430\u0430\u043d \u043d\u044d\u0440 \u0434\u044d\u0432\u0448\u0438\u0433\u0447": "\u0411\u0438\u0435 \u0434\u0430\u0430\u043d \u043d\u044d\u0440 \u0434\u044d\u0432\u0448\u0438\u0433\u0447", "\u0422\u0430 \u0431\u0438\u0434\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u044d\u0432\u0441\u044d\u043b": "\u0422\u0430 \u0431\u0438\u0434\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u044d\u0432\u0441\u044d\u043b", "\u0428\u0438\u043d\u044d \u044d\u0432\u0441\u044d\u043b": "\u0428\u0438\u043d\u044d \u044d\u0432\u0441\u044d\u043b", "\u0417\u04e9\u0432 \u0445\u04af\u043d \u044d\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0430\u0442 \u044d\u0432\u0441\u044d\u043b": "\u0417\u04e9\u0432 \u0445\u04af\u043d \u044d\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0442\u043e\u0440\u0430\u0442 \u044d\u0432\u0441\u044d\u043b", "\u0421\u0430\u0445\u0438\u0433\u0442\u0443\u043d! \u04ae\u043d\u0434\u0441\u044d\u043d \u0445\u0443\u0443\u043b\u0438\u0439\u043d 19 \u044d\u0432\u0441\u044d\u043b": "\u0421\u0430\u0445\u0438\u0433\u0442\u0443\u043d! \u04ae\u043d\u0434\u0441\u044d\u043d \u0445\u0443\u0443\u043b\u0438\u0439\u043d 19 \u044d\u0432\u0441\u044d\u043b", "\u041c\u043e\u043d\u0433\u043e\u043b\u044b\u043d \u041d\u043e\u0433\u043e\u043e\u043d \u043d\u0430\u043c": "\u041c\u043e\u043d\u0433\u043e\u043b\u044b\u043d \u041d\u043e\u0433\u043e\u043e\u043d \u043d\u0430\u043c", "\u0410\u0440\u0434 \u0422\u04af\u043c\u043d\u044d\u044d \u0425\u0430\u0439\u0440\u043b\u0430\u044f \u043d\u0430\u043c": "\u0410\u0440\u0434 \u0422\u04af\u043c\u043d\u044d\u044d \u0425\u0430\u0439\u0440\u043b\u0430\u044f \u043d\u0430\u043c", "\u0410\u0440\u0434 \u0422\u04af\u043c\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u041e\u043b\u043e\u043d\u0445\u0438\u0439\u043d \u0417\u0430\u0441\u0430\u0433\u043b\u0430\u043b \u043d\u0430\u043c": "\u0410\u0440\u0434 \u0422\u04af\u043c\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u041e\u043b\u043e\u043d\u0445\u0438\u0439\u043d \u0417\u0430\u0441\u0430\u0433\u043b\u0430\u043b \u043d\u0430\u043c", "\u0417\u043e\u043d \u041e\u043b\u043d\u044b \u043d\u0430\u043c": "\u0417\u043e\u043d \u041e\u043b\u043d\u044b \u043d\u0430\u043c", "\u042d\u0440\u0445 \u0427\u04e9\u043b\u04e9\u04e9\u0433 \u0425\u044d\u0440\u044d\u0433\u0436\u04af\u04af\u043b\u044d\u0433\u0447 \u043d\u0430\u043c": "\u042d\u0440\u0445 \u0427\u04e9\u043b\u04e9\u04e9\u0433 \u0425\u044d\u0440\u044d\u0433\u0436\u04af\u04af\u043b\u044d\u0433\u0447 \u043d\u0430\u043c", "\u0413\u044d\u0440 \u0445\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043e\u043b\u043e\u043b \u0445\u04e9\u0433\u0436\u043b\u0438\u0439\u043d \u043d\u0430\u043c": "\u0413\u044d\u0440 \u0445\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043e\u043b\u043e\u043b \u0445\u04e9\u0433\u0436\u043b\u0438\u0439\u043d \u043d\u0430\u043c", "\u0418\u0445 \u042d\u0432 \u043d\u0430\u043c": "\u0418\u0445 \u042d\u0432 \u043d\u0430\u043c", "\u0425\u04e9\u0433\u0436\u043b\u0438\u0439\u043d \u0425\u04e9\u0442\u04e9\u043b\u0431\u04e9\u0440 \u043d\u0430\u043c": "\u0425\u04e9\u0433\u0436\u043b\u0438\u0439\u043d \u0425\u04e9\u0442\u04e9\u043b\u0431\u04e9\u0440 \u043d\u0430\u043c", "\u0410\u0440\u0434 \u0422\u04af\u043c\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u043d\u0430\u043c": "\u0410\u0440\u0434 \u0422\u04af\u043c\u043d\u0438\u0439 \u043d\u0430\u043c", "\u0414\u044d\u043b\u0445\u0438\u0439\u043d \u041c\u043e\u043d\u0433\u043e\u043b\u0447\u0443\u0443\u0434 \u043d\u0430\u043c": "\u0414\u044d\u043b\u0445\u0438\u0439\u043d \u041c\u043e\u043d\u0433\u043e\u043b\u0447\u0443\u0443\u0434 \u043d\u0430\u043c", "\u042d\u0445 \u041e\u0440\u043e\u043d\u0447\u0434\u044b\u043d \u041d\u044d\u0433\u0434\u0441\u044d\u043d \u043d\u0430\u043c": "\u042d\u0445 \u041e\u0440\u043e\u043d\u0447\u0434\u044b\u043d \u041d\u044d\u0433\u0434\u0441\u044d\u043d \u043d\u0430\u043c"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 29, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 29, "registered_not_positive": 29}, "n_stations_flagged": 29, "created_at": "2026-07-13T00:48:53.708008", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.555, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.629, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.523, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.555, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.57, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.842, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.461, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.744, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.026, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.707, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.629, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.629, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.523, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.523, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.463, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.463, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 29}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "95038fb0fab048cb9ab9aece265790b5", "name": "Taiwan 2020 presidential (overnight taiwan_2020_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Taiwan", "year": 2020, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/kiang/vote2020 (result/final.json.gz, key P1) \u2014 CEC official TV-download JSON; data from Central Election Commission (CEC) Taiwan db.cec.gov.tw; code MIT / data CC BY 4.0", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Soong_Chu_yu_PFP": "Soong_Chu_yu_PFP", "Han_Kuo_yu_KMT": "Han_Kuo_yu_KMT", "Tsai_Ing_wen_DPP": "Tsai_Ing_wen_DPP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17226, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-13T00:48:04.709874", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.898, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.945, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.82, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.719, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.898, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.637, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.984, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.719, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.735, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.876, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.189, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.189, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17226}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ef713aa8e4774d7ab3d96ddbfb407881", "name": "Kyrgyzstan 2021 parliamentary (overnight kyrgyzstan_2021_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Kyrgyzstan", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ess.shailoo.gov.kg (CEC ESS API: /api/ele/20211128_3/bcr/sbj/2/protocol?pec_code={pec})", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u0410\u0422\u0410-\u041c\u0415\u041a\u0415\u041d": "\u0410\u0422\u0410-\u041c\u0415\u041a\u0415\u041d", "\u0411\u04ae\u0422\u04ae\u041d \u041a\u042b\u0420\u0413\u042b\u0417\u0421\u0422\u0410\u041d": "\u0411\u04ae\u0422\u04ae\u041d \u041a\u042b\u0420\u0413\u042b\u0417\u0421\u0422\u0410\u041d", "\u0410\u041b\u042c\u042f\u041d\u0421": "\u0410\u041b\u042c\u042f\u041d\u0421", "\u041b\u0415\u0413\u0410\u041b\u0410\u0419\u0417": "\u041b\u0415\u0413\u0410\u041b\u0410\u0419\u0417", "\u042b\u0419\u041c\u0410\u041d \u041d\u0423\u0420\u0423": "\u042b\u0419\u041c\u0410\u041d \u041d\u0423\u0420\u0423", "\u041a\u04ae\u0427\u0422\u04ae\u04ae \u0420\u0415\u0413\u0418\u041e\u041d": "\u041a\u04ae\u0427\u0422\u04ae\u04ae \u0420\u0415\u0413\u0418\u041e\u041d", "\u0411\u0410\u0413\u042b\u0422": "\u0411\u0410\u0413\u042b\u0422", "\u042b\u041d\u0422\u042b\u041c\u0410\u041a": "\u042b\u041d\u0422\u042b\u041c\u0410\u041a", "\u0418\u0428\u0415\u041d\u0418\u041c": "\u0418\u0428\u0415\u041d\u0418\u041c", "\u0410\u0417\u0410\u0422\u0422\u042b\u041a": "\u0410\u0417\u0410\u0422\u0422\u042b\u041a", "\u041c\u0415\u041a\u0415\u041d\u0427\u0418\u041b \u042d\u041b": "\u041c\u0415\u041a\u0415\u041d\u0427\u0418\u041b \u042d\u041b", "\u041a\u042b\u0420\u0413\u042b\u0417\u0421\u0422\u0410\u041d \u0416\u0410\u0428\u042b\u041b\u0414\u0410\u0420 \u041f\u0410\u0420\u0422\u0418\u042f\u0421\u042b": "\u041a\u042b\u0420\u0413\u042b\u0417\u0421\u0422\u0410\u041d \u0416\u0410\u0428\u042b\u041b\u0414\u0410\u0420 \u041f\u0410\u0420\u0422\u0418\u042f\u0421\u042b", "\u0416\u0410\u0428\u0410\u0421\u042b\u041d \u041a\u042b\u0420\u0413\u042b\u0417\u0421\u0422\u0410\u041d": "\u0416\u0410\u0428\u0410\u0421\u042b\u041d \u041a\u042b\u0420\u0413\u042b\u0417\u0421\u0422\u0410\u041d", "\u0421\u041e\u0426\u0418\u0410\u041b-\u0414\u0415\u041c\u041e\u041a\u0420\u0410\u0422\u0422\u0410\u0420": "\u0421\u041e\u0426\u0418\u0410\u041b-\u0414\u0415\u041c\u041e\u041a\u0420\u0410\u0422\u0422\u0410\u0420", "\u0410\u0420\u0423\u0423\u0417\u0410\u0422-\u042d\u041b \u041a\u0423\u0422\u0423": "\u0410\u0420\u0423\u0423\u0417\u0410\u0422-\u042d\u041b \u041a\u0423\u0422\u0423", "\u041f\u0410\u0422\u0420\u0418\u041e\u0422\u0418\u0427\u0415\u0421\u041a\u0410\u042f \u041f\u0410\u0420\u0422\u0418\u042f \u0415\u0414\u0418\u041d\u0415\u041d\u0418\u042f \u041a\u042b\u0420\u0413\u042b\u0417\u0421\u0422\u0410\u041d\u0410": "\u041f\u0410\u0422\u0420\u0418\u041e\u0422\u0418\u0427\u0415\u0421\u041a\u0410\u042f \u041f\u0410\u0420\u0422\u0418\u042f \u0415\u0414\u0418\u041d\u0415\u041d\u0418\u042f \u041a\u042b\u0420\u0413\u042b\u0417\u0421\u0422\u0410\u041d\u0410", "\u0423\u041b\u0423\u0422\u0422\u0410\u0420 \u0411\u0418\u0420\u0418\u041c\u0414\u0418\u0413\u0418": "\u0423\u041b\u0423\u0422\u0422\u0410\u0420 \u0411\u0418\u0420\u0418\u041c\u0414\u0418\u0413\u0418", "\u042d\u041b \u04ae\u041c\u04ae\u0422\u04ae": "\u042d\u041b \u04ae\u041c\u04ae\u0422\u04ae", "\u041e\u0420\u0414\u041e": "\u041e\u0420\u0414\u041e", "\u0423\u041b\u0423\u0423-\u0416\u0423\u0420\u0422": "\u0423\u041b\u0423\u0423-\u0416\u0423\u0420\u0422", "\u0410\u0422\u0410-\u0416\u0423\u0420\u0422 \u041a\u042b\u0420\u0413\u042b\u0417\u0421\u0422\u0410\u041d": "\u0410\u0422\u0410-\u0416\u0423\u0420\u0422 \u041a\u042b\u0420\u0413\u042b\u0417\u0421\u0422\u0410\u041d", "\u0411\u0410\u0410\u0420\u042b\u041d\u0410 \u041a\u0410\u0420\u0428\u042b": "\u0411\u0410\u0410\u0420\u042b\u041d\u0410 \u041a\u0410\u0420\u0428\u042b"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2494, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-07-13T00:47:56.484250", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.623, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.96, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.41, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.256, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.623, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.96, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.613, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.157, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.777, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.444, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.41, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.256, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.256, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.278, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.278, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.66, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.412, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.619, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2494}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "316632a5e478493f9d92720c1cc9f803", "name": "Taiwan 2024 parliamentary (overnight taiwan_2024_legislative_district.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Taiwan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.cec.gov.tw/ (\u9078\u8209\u8cc7\u6599\u5eab/votedata.zip, updated 2025-01-24) -> votedata/voteData/2024\u7e3d\u7d71\u7acb\u59d4/\u5340\u57df\u7acb\u59d4/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"party_\u4e2d\u570b\u570b\u6c11\u9ee8": "party_\u4e2d\u570b\u570b\u6c11\u9ee8", "party_\u4e2d\u83ef\u5a66\u5973\u9ee8": "party_\u4e2d\u83ef\u5a66\u5973\u9ee8", "party_\u4e2d\u83ef\u611b\u570b\u540c\u5fc3\u9ee8": "party_\u4e2d\u83ef\u611b\u570b\u540c\u5fc3\u9ee8", "party_\u4e2d\u83ef\u6587\u5316\u5171\u548c\u9ee8": "party_\u4e2d\u83ef\u6587\u5316\u5171\u548c\u9ee8", "party_\u4e2d\u83ef\u7d71\u4e00\u4fc3\u9032\u9ee8": "party_\u4e2d\u83ef\u7d71\u4e00\u4fc3\u9032\u9ee8", "party_\u4e2d\u83ef\u806f\u5408\u9ee8": "party_\u4e2d\u83ef\u806f\u5408\u9ee8", "party_\u4eba\u6c11\u6700\u5927\u9ee8": "party_\u4eba\u6c11\u6700\u5927\u9ee8", "party_\u4eba\u6c11\u6c11\u4e3b\u9ee8": "party_\u4eba\u6c11\u6c11\u4e3b\u9ee8", "party_\u5236\u5ea6\u6551\u4e16\u5cf6": "party_\u5236\u5ea6\u6551\u4e16\u5cf6", "party_\u52de\u52d5\u9ee8": "party_\u52de\u52d5\u9ee8", "party_\u53f0\u7063\u570b\u6c11\u9ee8": "party_\u53f0\u7063\u570b\u6c11\u9ee8", "party_\u53f0\u7063\u57fa\u9032": "party_\u53f0\u7063\u57fa\u9032", "party_\u53f0\u7063\u6574\u5fa9\u5e2b\u806f\u76df\u5de5\u9ee8": "party_\u53f0\u7063\u6574\u5fa9\u5e2b\u806f\u76df\u5de5\u9ee8", "party_\u53f0\u7063\u6c11\u773e\u9ee8": "party_\u53f0\u7063\u6c11\u773e\u9ee8", "party_\u53f0\u7063\u7da0\u9ee8": "party_\u53f0\u7063\u7da0\u9ee8", "party_\u53f0\u7063\u7dad\u65b0": "party_\u53f0\u7063\u7dad\u65b0", "party_\u53f0\u7063\u9769\u547d\u9ee8": "party_\u53f0\u7063\u9769\u547d\u9ee8", "party_\u53f0\u7063\u9ebb\u5c07\u6700\u5927\u9ee8": "party_\u53f0\u7063\u9ebb\u5c07\u6700\u5927\u9ee8", "party_\u53f8\u6cd5\u6539\u9769\u9ee8": "party_\u53f8\u6cd5\u6539\u9769\u9ee8", "party_\u53f8\u6cd5\u6b63\u7fa9\u9ee8": "party_\u53f8\u6cd5\u6b63\u7fa9\u9ee8", "party_\u5408\u4e00\u884c\u52d5\u806f\u76df": "party_\u5408\u4e00\u884c\u52d5\u806f\u76df", "party_\u559c\u6a02\u5cf6\u806f\u76df": "party_\u559c\u6a02\u5cf6\u806f\u76df", "party_\u5bb6\u5ead\u57fa\u672c\u6536\u5165": "party_\u5bb6\u5ead\u57fa\u672c\u6536\u5165", "party_\u5c0f\u6c11\u53c3\u653f\u6b50\u5df4\u6851\u806f\u76df": "party_\u5c0f\u6c11\u53c3\u653f\u6b50\u5df4\u6851\u806f\u76df", "party_\u5fa9\u5eb7\u806f\u76df\u9ee8": "party_\u5fa9\u5eb7\u806f\u76df\u9ee8", "party_\u65b0\u9ee8": "party_\u65b0\u9ee8", "party_\u6642\u4ee3\u529b\u91cf": "party_\u6642\u4ee3\u529b\u91cf", "party_\u6c11\u4e3b\u9032\u6b65\u9ee8": "party_\u6c11\u4e3b\u9032\u6b65\u9ee8", "party_\u7121\u9ee8\u7c4d\u53ca\u672a\u7d93\u653f\u9ee8\u63a8\u85a6": "party_\u7121\u9ee8\u7c4d\u53ca\u672a\u7d93\u653f\u9ee8\u63a8\u85a6", "party_\u793e\u6703\u6c11\u4e3b\u9ee8": "party_\u793e\u6703\u6c11\u4e3b\u9ee8", "party_\u7d93\u6fdf\u9ee8": "party_\u7d93\u6fdf\u9ee8", "party_\u81fa\u7063\u96d9\u8a9e\u7121\u6cd5\u9ee8": "party_\u81fa\u7063\u96d9\u8a9e\u7121\u6cd5\u9ee8", "party_\u8208\u4e2d\u540c\u76df\u6703": "party_\u8208\u4e2d\u540c\u76df\u6703"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17795, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-07-13T00:46:56.711865", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.877, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.941, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.804, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.707, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.294, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.462, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.707, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.707, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.22, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.22, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17795}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6c2f39e31b784540a1897b191bc50286", "name": "Taiwan 2024 parliamentary (overnight taiwan_2024_legislative_partylist.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Taiwan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.cec.gov.tw/ (\u9078\u8209\u8cc7\u6599\u5eab/votedata.zip, updated 2025-01-24) -> votedata/voteData/2024\u7e3d\u7d71\u7acb\u59d4/\u4e0d\u5206\u5340\u653f\u9ee8/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u5c0f\u6c11\u53c3\u653f\u6b50\u5df4\u6851\u806f\u76df": "\u5c0f\u6c11\u53c3\u653f\u6b50\u5df4\u6851\u806f\u76df", "\u53f0\u7063\u7da0\u9ee8": "\u53f0\u7063\u7da0\u9ee8", "\u81fa\u7063\u96d9\u8a9e\u7121\u6cd5\u9ee8": "\u81fa\u7063\u96d9\u8a9e\u7121\u6cd5\u9ee8", "\u53f0\u7063\u57fa\u9032": "\u53f0\u7063\u57fa\u9032", "\u4e2d\u83ef\u7d71\u4e00\u4fc3\u9032\u9ee8": "\u4e2d\u83ef\u7d71\u4e00\u4fc3\u9032\u9ee8", "\u6c11\u4e3b\u9032\u6b65\u9ee8": "\u6c11\u4e3b\u9032\u6b65\u9ee8", "\u5236\u5ea6\u6551\u4e16\u5cf6": "\u5236\u5ea6\u6551\u4e16\u5cf6", "\u6642\u4ee3\u529b\u91cf": "\u6642\u4ee3\u529b\u91cf", "\u4e2d\u570b\u570b\u6c11\u9ee8": "\u4e2d\u570b\u570b\u6c11\u9ee8", "\u53f8\u6cd5\u6539\u9769\u9ee8": "\u53f8\u6cd5\u6539\u9769\u9ee8", "\u65b0\u9ee8": "\u65b0\u9ee8", "\u53f0\u7063\u6c11\u773e\u9ee8": "\u53f0\u7063\u6c11\u773e\u9ee8", "\u53f0\u7063\u7dad\u65b0": "\u53f0\u7063\u7dad\u65b0", "\u89aa\u6c11\u9ee8": "\u89aa\u6c11\u9ee8", "\u4eba\u6c11\u6700\u5927\u9ee8": "\u4eba\u6c11\u6700\u5927\u9ee8", "\u53f0\u7063\u5718\u7d50\u806f\u76df": "\u53f0\u7063\u5718\u7d50\u806f\u76df"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17795, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-13T00:45:36.039188", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.877, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.941, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.804, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.707, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.294, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.462, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.707, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.707, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.22, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.22, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17795}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "150d5dbfdc4a4229b7f426dc29836db9", "name": "Lebanon 2022 parliamentary \u2014 Beirut II district per-qalam (811 stations; district-scoped)", "metadata": {"country": "Lebanon", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Beirut II district, per-qalam (811 stations). Lebanese OPEN-LIST PREFERENTIAL system: each valid ballot = 1 list vote + at most 1 preferential candidate vote, so the 87 candidate columns (preferential votes) sum to 0.79-1.0x of valid ballots BY DESIGN (list-only ballots cast no preferential). Not a double-count. Source: omarabboud/lebanon_elections mirror of MoIM (interior.gov.lb).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"abd_mutarji": "abd_mutarji", "abdellatif_itani": "abdellatif_itani", "abdelrahman_almubasher": "abdelrahman_almubasher", "adel_aldeek": "adel_aldeek", "adel_alhalabi": "adel_alhalabi", "adnan_traboulsi": "adnan_traboulsi", "ahmad_ayash": "ahmad_ayash", "ahmad_dabbagh": "ahmad_dabbagh", "ahmed_khalid": "ahmed_khalid", "alexei_alhaddad": "alexei_alhaddad", "ali_abbas": "ali_abbas", "ali_fasai": "ali_fasai", "almutasim_adham": "almutasim_adham", "amin_sherri": "amin_sherri", "ayman_ali": "ayman_ali", "bashir_itani": "bashir_itani", "dalal_alrahbani": "dalal_alrahbani", "edgard_traboulsi": "edgard_traboulsi", "emad_alhout": "emad_alhout", "faisal_alsayegh": "faisal_alsayegh", "faisal_altamrawi": "faisal_altamrawi", "fatima_meshref": "fatima_meshref", "fuad_haddad": "fuad_haddad", "fuad_makhzoumi": "fuad_makhzoumi", "hadi_alhusni": "hadi_alhusni", "haidar_bazzi": "haidar_bazzi", "hani_alhamdiye": "hani_alhamdiye", "harutioun_kozian": "harutioun_kozian", "hasan_kashli": "hasan_kashli", "huda_assi": "huda_assi", "ibrahim_mnaimneh": "ibrahim_mnaimneh", "iman_tabbara": "iman_tabbara", "iyad_albanna": "iyad_albanna", "jihad_hamoud": "jihad_hamoud", "karim_shabaqlo": "karim_shabaqlo", "khaled_qabbani": "khaled_qabbani", "khalid_hanqeer": "khalid_hanqeer", "khalil_broumana": "khalil_broumana", "lina_altannir": "lina_altannir", "lina_hamdan": "lina_hamdan", "maha_alrassi": "maha_alrassi", "maha_shati": "maha_shati", "mahmoud_aljamal": "mahmoud_aljamal", "mahmoud_fakih": "mahmoud_fakih", "mahmoud_merhi": "mahmoud_merhi", "majed_dimashkieh": "majed_dimashkieh", "malouf_ramzi": "malouf_ramzi", "marie_aljalakh": "marie_aljalakh", "marwan_salam": "marwan_salam", "maya_shatila": "maya_shatila", "mazen_shbarro": "mazen_shbarro", "melhem_khalaf": "melhem_khalaf", "michel_fallah": "michel_fallah", "mohamed_alarab": "mohamed_alarab", "mohamed_ardaroumli": "mohamed_ardaroumli", "mohamed_itani": "mohamed_itani", "mohamed_khawaja": "mohamed_khawaja", "mohamed_shihab": "mohamed_shihab", "muwaffak_alwatar": "muwaffak_alwatar", "nabil_badr": "nabil_badr", "nabil_itani": "nabil_itani", "nabil_naja": "nabil_naja", "nahida_khalil": "nahida_khalil", "naim_alayash": "naim_alayash", "najib_saba": "najib_saba", "nasib_aljawhari": "nasib_aljawhari", "nasir_mohamed": "nasir_mohamed", "nuhad_yazbek": "nuhad_yazbek", "omar_aldabghi": "omar_aldabghi", "omar_sabra": "omar_sabra", "paola_rebeiz": "paola_rebeiz", "rima_abuchakra": "rima_abuchakra", "rushdi_qabbani": "rushdi_qabbani", "samah_halwani": "samah_halwani", "samer_ghazi": "samer_ghazi", "sara_yasin": "sara_yasin", "shiran_ali": "shiran_ali", "ulfat_alsabi": "ulfat_alsabi", "waddah_alsadek": "waddah_alsadek", "walid_itani": "walid_itani", "wiam_dallal": "wiam_dallal", "wissam_fakhr": "wissam_fakhr", "yasin_fawaz": "yasin_fawaz", "yusra_altannir": "yusra_altannir", "zeina_almasri": "zeina_almasri", "zeina_majdalani": "zeina_majdalani", "zeina_munther": "zeina_munther"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 811, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 510, "registered_not_positive": 811, "cast_gt_registered": 805}, "n_stations_flagged": 811, "created_at": "2026-07-13T00:45:30.075835", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.796, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.831, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.405, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.25, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.796, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.232, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.223, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.398, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.349, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.404, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.405, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.405, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.25, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.25, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.253, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.253, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.648, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.502, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.502, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 811}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0fcf35251d8246418512ba324ff5546f", "name": "India 2024 Lok Sabha \u2014 Bengaluru + Chennai booth-level (7 metro PCs, 14,556 booths)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.opencity.in/dataset/parliamentary-elections-2024-form-20s", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"MANSOOR ALI KHAN [Bangalore Central]": "MANSOOR ALI KHAN [Bangalore Central]", "C P MOHAN [Bangalore Central]": "C P MOHAN [Bangalore Central]", "SATISH CHANDRA. M. [Bangalore Central]": "SATISH CHANDRA. M. [Bangalore Central]", "KARTHIK. K [Bangalore Central]": "KARTHIK. K [Bangalore Central]", "B. KRISHNA PRASAD [Bangalore Central]": "B. KRISHNA PRASAD [Bangalore Central]", "T.R. JAGANNATHA RAO [Bangalore Central]": "T.R. JAGANNATHA RAO [Bangalore Central]", "PRAKASH. K [Bangalore Central]": "PRAKASH. K [Bangalore Central]", "MUKTHAR ALI KHAN [Bangalore Central]": "MUKTHAR ALI KHAN [Bangalore Central]", "No. WHITEFIELD MURUGESH [Bangalore Central]": "No. WHITEFIELD MURUGESH [Bangalore Central]", "RANJITH VISHWA [Bangalore Central]": "RANJITH VISHWA [Bangalore Central]", "C.M. SHABAZ KHAN [Bangalore Central]": "C.M. SHABAZ KHAN [Bangalore Central]", "H. P. SHIVAPRAKASH [Bangalore Central]": "H. P. SHIVAPRAKASH [Bangalore Central]", "ABHAYA SHEELA. [Bangalore Central]": "ABHAYA SHEELA. [Bangalore Central]", "SURESH BABU. C M. [Bangalore Central]": "SURESH BABU. C M. [Bangalore Central]", "UMA. V. [Bangalore Central]": "UMA. V. [Bangalore Central]", "M. S. KRISHNA [Bangalore Central]": "M. S. KRISHNA [Bangalore Central]", "JAYALAKSHMI SUNDARA RAJAN [Bangalore Central]": "JAYALAKSHMI SUNDARA RAJAN [Bangalore Central]", "MURUGESH. R [Bangalore Central]": "MURUGESH. R [Bangalore Central]", "MODI SAIFULLA [Bangalore Central]": "MODI SAIFULLA [Bangalore Central]", "K. [Bangalore Central]": "K. [Bangalore Central]", "cand_21 [Bangalore Central]": "cand_21 [Bangalore Central]", "RUMAN SHARIFFE [Bangalore Central]": "RUMAN SHARIFFE [Bangalore Central]", "VASANTH KUMAR ERAPPA [Bangalore Central]": "VASANTH KUMAR ERAPPA [Bangalore Central]", "SYED ASIF BUKHARI [Bangalore Central]": "SYED ASIF BUKHARI [Bangalore Central]", "NOTA [Bangalore Central]": "NOTA [Bangalore Central]", "GOVINDAIAH [Bangalore North]": "GOVINDAIAH [Bangalore North]", "PROFESSOR M.V RAJEEV GOWDA [Bangalore North]": "PROFESSOR M.V RAJEEV GOWDA [Bangalore North]", "SHOBHA KARANDLAJE [Bangalore North]": "SHOBHA KARANDLAJE [Bangalore North]", "UDAYA [Bangalore North]": "UDAYA [Bangalore North]", "cand_05 [Bangalore North]": "cand_05 [Bangalore North]", "cand_06 [Bangalore North]": "cand_06 [Bangalore North]", "GLOBE J. STAR JAI SIMHA B E. [Bangalore North]": "GLOBE J. STAR JAI SIMHA B E. [Bangalore North]", "NIRMALA H.L [Bangalore North]": "NIRMALA H.L [Bangalore North]", "PARASAPPA BHEEMAPPA GAJJERI [Bangalore North]": "PARASAPPA BHEEMAPPA GAJJERI [Bangalore North]", "HEBBAL VENKATESH.J [Bangalore North]": "HEBBAL VENKATESH.J [Bangalore North]", "SHIVAKUMAR. B [Bangalore North]": "SHIVAKUMAR. B [Bangalore North]", "SHOBAN BABU V [Bangalore North]": "SHOBAN BABU V [Bangalore North]", "SANTHOSH M [Bangalore North]": "SANTHOSH M [Bangalore North]", "DILIP KUMAR I.S. [Bangalore North]": "DILIP KUMAR I.S. [Bangalore North]", "Pura [Bangalore North]": "Pura [Bangalore North]", "cand_16 [Bangalore North]": "cand_16 [Bangalore North]", "BHASKAR ANKALAMADUGU SHIVAREDDY [Bangalore North]": "BHASKAR ANKALAMADUGU SHIVAREDDY [Bangalore North]", "K.M.MAHADEVA [Bangalore North]": "K.M.MAHADEVA [Bangalore North]", "LAKSHMI [Bangalore North]": "LAKSHMI [Bangalore North]", "cand_20 [Bangalore North]": "cand_20 [Bangalore North]", "V [Bangalore North]": "V [Bangalore North]", "NOTA [Bangalore North]": "NOTA [Bangalore North]", "C DR N MANJUNATH [Bangalore Rural]": "C DR N MANJUNATH [Bangalore Rural]", "D K SURESH [Bangalore Rural]": "D K SURESH [Bangalore Rural]", "ABHISHEK K [Bangalore Rural]": "ABHISHEK K [Bangalore Rural]", "KUMAR L [Bangalore Rural]": "KUMAR L [Bangalore Rural]", "N KRISHNAPPA [Bangalore Rural]": "N KRISHNAPPA [Bangalore Rural]", "No. H V CHANDRASHEKAR [Bangalore Rural]": "No. H V CHANDRASHEKAR [Bangalore Rural]", "MAHAMAD MUSADIK PASHA [Bangalore Rural]": "MAHAMAD MUSADIK PASHA [Bangalore Rural]", "MOHAMMAD DASTAGEER [Bangalore Rural]": "MOHAMMAD DASTAGEER [Bangalore Rural]", "C N MANJUNATHA [Bangalore Rural]": "C N MANJUNATHA [Bangalore Rural]", "VASIST J [Bangalore Rural]": "VASIST J [Bangalore Rural]", "SURESH S [Bangalore Rural]": "SURESH S [Bangalore Rural]", "HEMAVATHI K [Bangalore Rural]": "HEMAVATHI K [Bangalore Rural]", "NARASIMHAMURTHY J P [Bangalore Rural]": "NARASIMHAMURTHY J P [Bangalore Rural]", "J T PRAKASH [Bangalore Rural]": "J T PRAKASH [Bangalore Rural]", "SURESH M N [Bangalore Rural]": "SURESH M N [Bangalore Rural]", "NOTA [Bangalore Rural]": "NOTA [Bangalore Rural]", "ARUN PRASAD.A [Bangalore South]": "ARUN PRASAD.A [Bangalore South]", "TEJASVI SURYA [Bangalore South]": "TEJASVI SURYA [Bangalore South]", "SOWMYA REDDY [Bangalore South]": "SOWMYA REDDY [Bangalore South]", "KEMPEGOWDA [Bangalore South]": "KEMPEGOWDA [Bangalore South]", "CHETAN [Bangalore South]": "CHETAN [Bangalore South]", "cand_06 [Bangalore South]": "cand_06 [Bangalore South]", "KARAVALI MANJUNATH. BE [Bangalore South]": "KARAVALI MANJUNATH. BE [Bangalore South]", "No. RAGHUPATHI BHAT [Bangalore South]": "No. RAGHUPATHI BHAT [Bangalore South]", "VATAL NAGARAJ [Bangalore South]": "VATAL NAGARAJ [Bangalore South]", "C M. SHABAZ KHAN [Bangalore South]": "C M. SHABAZ KHAN [Bangalore South]", "A ASGAR [Bangalore South]": "A ASGAR [Bangalore South]", "cand_12 [Bangalore South]": "cand_12 [Bangalore South]", "C. K. [Bangalore South]": "C. K. [Bangalore South]", "cand_14 [Bangalore South]": "cand_14 [Bangalore South]", "TINTISHA HEMACHANDRA SAGAR [Bangalore South]": "TINTISHA HEMACHANDRA SAGAR [Bangalore South]", "TEJASWINI DHANANJAY [Bangalore South]": "TEJASWINI DHANANJAY [Bangalore South]", "A RAJ. [Bangalore South]": "A RAJ. [Bangalore South]", "V.RAJKUMAR VCK [Bangalore South]": "V.RAJKUMAR VCK [Bangalore South]", "RANJITH GOWDA [Bangalore South]": "RANJITH GOWDA [Bangalore South]", "DR.R.SHEKAR THIRUMAVALVAN [Bangalore South]": "DR.R.SHEKAR THIRUMAVALVAN [Bangalore South]", "SUBRAHMANYA KUMAR KUNTIKANAMATA [Bangalore South]": "SUBRAHMANYA KUMAR KUNTIKANAMATA [Bangalore South]", "DR HARISH GOWDA [Bangalore South]": "DR HARISH GOWDA [Bangalore South]", "NOTA [Bangalore South]": "NOTA [Bangalore South]", "Party Samaj Bahujan [Chennai Central]": "Party Samaj Bahujan [Chennai Central]", "Munnetra Kazhagam Dravida [Chennai Central]": "Munnetra Kazhagam Dravida [Chennai Central]", "Kazhagam Murpokku Dravida Desiya [Chennai Central]": "Kazhagam Murpokku Dravida Desiya [Chennai Central]", "Party Janata Bharatiya [Chennai Central]": "Party Janata Bharatiya [Chennai Central]", "Sakthi Makkal Desiya Katchi [Chennai Central]": "Sakthi Makkal Desiya Katchi [Chennai Central]", "Dynamic Anticorruption Party [Chennai Central]": "Dynamic Anticorruption Party [Chennai Central]", "Katchi Tamilar Naam [Chennai Central]": "Katchi Tamilar Naam [Chennai Central]", "Makkal Naadaalum Katchi [Chennai Central]": "Makkal Naadaalum Katchi [Chennai Central]", "party Youth Chennai [Chennai Central]": "party Youth Chennai [Chennai Central]", "KATCHI THAKKAM [Chennai Central]": "KATCHI THAKKAM [Chennai Central]", "Party Sultan Tipu [Chennai Central]": "Party Sultan Tipu [Chennai Central]", "Independent [Chennai Central]": "Independent [Chennai Central]", "Independent #2 [Chennai Central]": "Independent #2 [Chennai Central]", "Independent #3 [Chennai Central]": "Independent #3 [Chennai Central]", "Independent #4 [Chennai Central]": "Independent #4 [Chennai Central]", "Independent #5 [Chennai Central]": "Independent #5 [Chennai Central]", "Independent #6 [Chennai Central]": "Independent #6 [Chennai Central]", "Independent #7 [Chennai Central]": "Independent #7 [Chennai Central]", "Independent #8 [Chennai Central]": "Independent #8 [Chennai Central]", "Independent #9 [Chennai Central]": "Independent #9 [Chennai Central]", "Independent #10 [Chennai Central]": "Independent #10 [Chennai Central]", "Independent #11 [Chennai Central]": "Independent #11 [Chennai Central]", "Independent #12 [Chennai Central]": "Independent #12 [Chennai Central]", "Independent #13 [Chennai Central]": "Independent #13 [Chennai Central]", "Independent #14 [Chennai Central]": "Independent #14 [Chennai Central]", "Independent #15 [Chennai Central]": "Independent #15 [Chennai Central]", "Independent #16 [Chennai Central]": "Independent #16 [Chennai Central]", "Independent #17 [Chennai Central]": "Independent #17 [Chennai Central]", "Independent #18 [Chennai Central]": "Independent #18 [Chennai Central]", "Periyakkam Makkal Tamilnadu Nalvazhvu [Chennai Central]": "Periyakkam Makkal Tamilnadu Nalvazhvu [Chennai Central]", "Independent #19 [Chennai Central]": "Independent #19 [Chennai Central]", "NOTA [Chennai Central]": "NOTA [Chennai Central]", "Party Samaj No. Bahujan [Chennai North]": "Party Samaj No. Bahujan [Chennai North]", "Munnetra Kazhagam Dravida [Chennai North]": "Munnetra Kazhagam Dravida [Chennai North]", "Party Janata Bharatiya [Chennai North]": "Party Janata Bharatiya [Chennai North]", "Dravida Anna India All [Chennai North]": "Dravida Anna India All [Chennai North]", "Katchi Kazhagam Tamilar Munnetra Naam [Chennai North]": "Katchi Kazhagam Tamilar Munnetra Naam [Chennai North]", "KATCHI THAKKAM [Chennai North]": "KATCHI THAKKAM [Chennai North]", "Makkal UNITY Naadaalum SOCIALIST Katchi [Chennai North]": "Makkal UNITY Naadaalum SOCIALIST Katchi [Chennai North]", "INDIA OF CENTRE [Chennai North]": "INDIA OF CENTRE [Chennai North]", "Party Republican [Chennai North]": "Party Republican [Chennai North]", "Independent [Chennai North]": "Independent [Chennai North]", "Independent #2 [Chennai North]": "Independent #2 [Chennai North]", "Independent #3 [Chennai North]": "Independent #3 [Chennai North]", "Independent #4 [Chennai North]": "Independent #4 [Chennai North]", "Independent #5 [Chennai North]": "Independent #5 [Chennai North]", "Independent #6 [Chennai North]": "Independent #6 [Chennai North]", "Independent #7 [Chennai North]": "Independent #7 [Chennai North]", "Independent #8 [Chennai North]": "Independent #8 [Chennai North]", "Independent #9 [Chennai North]": "Independent #9 [Chennai North]", "Independent #10 [Chennai North]": "Independent #10 [Chennai North]", "Independent #11 [Chennai North]": "Independent #11 [Chennai North]", "Independent #12 [Chennai North]": "Independent #12 [Chennai North]", "Independent #13 [Chennai North]": "Independent #13 [Chennai North]", "Independent #14 [Chennai North]": "Independent #14 [Chennai North]", "Independent #15 [Chennai North]": "Independent #15 [Chennai North]", "Independent #16 [Chennai North]": "Independent #16 [Chennai North]", "Independent #17 [Chennai North]": "Independent #17 [Chennai North]", "Independent #18 [Chennai North]": "Independent #18 [Chennai North]", "Independent #19 [Chennai North]": "Independent #19 [Chennai North]", "Independent #20 [Chennai North]": "Independent #20 [Chennai North]", "Independent #21 [Chennai North]": "Independent #21 [Chennai North]", "Independent #22 [Chennai North]": "Independent #22 [Chennai North]", "Independent #23 [Chennai North]": "Independent #23 [Chennai North]", "Independent #24 [Chennai North]": "Independent #24 [Chennai North]", "Independent #25 [Chennai North]": "Independent #25 [Chennai North]", "Independent #26 [Chennai North]": "Independent #26 [Chennai North]", "NOTA [Chennai North]": "NOTA [Chennai North]", "Munnetra Kazhagam No. Dravida [Chennai South]": "Munnetra Kazhagam No. Dravida [Chennai South]", "Party Janata Bharatiya [Chennai South]": "Party Janata Bharatiya [Chennai South]", "G.P. Party Samaj Bahujan [Chennai South]": "G.P. Party Samaj Bahujan [Chennai South]", "Dravida Kazhagam Anna Munnetra India All [Chennai South]": "Dravida Kazhagam Anna Munnetra India All [Chennai South]", "A.K.D. Kazhakam Makkal Mahathma Munnetra [Chennai South]": "A.K.D. Kazhakam Makkal Mahathma Munnetra [Chennai South]", "Murpokku yag Katchi Tamizhaga Makkal at Vee [Chennai South]": "Murpokku yag Katchi Tamizhaga Makkal at Vee [Chennai South]", "Katchi Viswanathadoss Thozhilalarkal [Chennai South]": "Katchi Viswanathadoss Thozhilalarkal [Chennai South]", "SASI Makkal Naadaalum Katchi [Chennai South]": "SASI Makkal Naadaalum Katchi [Chennai South]", "KATCHI THAKKAM [Chennai South]": "KATCHI THAKKAM [Chennai South]", "Katchi Tamilar Naam [Chennai South]": "Katchi Tamilar Naam [Chennai South]", "Sabha Maha National Party [Chennai South]": "Sabha Maha National Party [Chennai South]", "MUNNETRA KAZHAGAM ARAVOR [Chennai South]": "MUNNETRA KAZHAGAM ARAVOR [Chennai South]", "Party Indian Vir Ke Viro [Chennai South]": "Party Indian Vir Ke Viro [Chennai South]", "Janata Jebamani [Chennai South]": "Janata Jebamani [Chennai South]", "S.K.J Sakthi Makkal Desiya Katchi [Chennai South]": "S.K.J Sakthi Makkal Desiya Katchi [Chennai South]", "Independent [Chennai South]": "Independent [Chennai South]", "Independent #2 [Chennai South]": "Independent #2 [Chennai South]", "Independent #3 [Chennai South]": "Independent #3 [Chennai South]", "Independent #4 [Chennai South]": "Independent #4 [Chennai South]", "J. Independent [Chennai South]": "J. Independent [Chennai South]", "P. Independent [Chennai South]": "P. Independent [Chennai South]", "Independent #5 [Chennai South]": "Independent #5 [Chennai South]", "Independent #6 [Chennai South]": "Independent #6 [Chennai South]", "I. Independent [Chennai South]": "I. Independent [Chennai South]", "Independent #7 [Chennai South]": "Independent #7 [Chennai South]", "Independent #8 [Chennai South]": "Independent #8 [Chennai South]", "Independent #9 [Chennai South]": "Independent #9 [Chennai South]", "Independent #10 [Chennai South]": "Independent #10 [Chennai South]", "Independent #11 [Chennai South]": "Independent #11 [Chennai South]", "Independent #12 [Chennai South]": "Independent #12 [Chennai South]", "Independent #13 [Chennai South]": "Independent #13 [Chennai South]", "Independent #14 [Chennai South]": "Independent #14 [Chennai South]", "Independent #15 [Chennai South]": "Independent #15 [Chennai South]", "Independent #16 [Chennai South]": "Independent #16 [Chennai South]", "Independent #17 [Chennai South]": "Independent #17 [Chennai South]", "Independent #18 [Chennai South]": "Independent #18 [Chennai South]", "Independent #19 [Chennai South]": "Independent #19 [Chennai South]", "V.P. Independent [Chennai South]": "V.P. Independent [Chennai South]", "E Independent [Chennai South]": "E Independent [Chennai South]", "Independent #20 [Chennai South]": "Independent #20 [Chennai South]", "Independent #21 [Chennai South]": "Independent #21 [Chennai South]", "NOTA [Chennai South]": "NOTA [Chennai South]"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14556, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 14547, "registered_not_positive": 14556}, "n_stations_flagged": 14556, "created_at": "2026-07-13T00:00:30.315676", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.381, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.281, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.281, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 14556}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "782aa34885c341c987e1395f8f5e601c", "name": "Indonesia 2024 parliamentary (overnight indonesia_2024_dpr.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Indonesia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://jdih.kpu.go.id/data/data_kepkpu/2024kpt360_L2.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PKB": "PKB", "Gerindra": "Gerindra", "PDIP": "PDIP", "Golkar": "Golkar", "NasDem": "NasDem", "Buruh": "Buruh", "Gelora": "Gelora", "PKS": "PKS", "PKN": "PKN", "Hanura": "Hanura", "Garuda": "Garuda", "PAN": "PAN", "PBB": "PBB", "Demokrat": "Demokrat", "PSI": "PSI", "Perindo": "Perindo", "PPP": "PPP", "Ummat": "Ummat"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 84, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 84, "registered_not_positive": 84}, "n_stations_flagged": 84, "created_at": "2026-07-13T00:00:22.552640", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.768, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.522, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.332, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.117, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.301, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.067, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.332, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.332, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.3, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.3, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.7, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.741, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 84}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7f72f2e2df034ad697b10a79caa1c392", "name": "Iran 2017 presidential (overnight iran_2017_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Iran", "year": 2017, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/\u0627\u0646\u062a\u062e\u0627\u0628\u0627\u062a_\u0631\u06cc\u0627\u0633\u062a\u200c\u062c\u0645\u0647\u0648\u0631\u06cc_\u0627\u06cc\u0631\u0627\u0646_(\u06f1\u06f3\u06f9\u06f6)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Rouhani": "Rouhani", "Raisi": "Raisi", "Mirsalim": "Mirsalim", "Hashemitaba": "Hashemitaba"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 32, "granularity": "province", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 32, "cast_gt_registered": 32}, "n_stations_flagged": 32, "created_at": "2026-07-13T00:00:18.975410", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.972, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.864, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.185, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.134, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.972, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.493, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.282, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.015, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.504, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.147, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.481, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.222, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.056, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.185, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.185, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.134, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.165, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.165, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.272, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.272, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.158, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.158, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.214, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.214, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 32}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "86f5a04b96a9441e8a0023df5cf27ac1", "name": "Kazakhstan 2022 presidential (overnight kazakhstan_2022_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Kazakhstan", "year": 2022, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Kazakh_presidential_election (transcribing zakon.kz CEC-sourced regional table: https://kaz.zakon.kz/6016416-sailau-korytyndysy-elimizdin-onirleri-kalai-dauys-berdi.html)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Tokayev": "Tokayev", "Dairabayev": "Dairabayev", "Abden": "Abden", "Kazhyken": "Kazhyken", "Auesbayev": "Auesbayev", "Tursynbekova": "Tursynbekova", "ProtivVsekh": "ProtivVsekh"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20, "granularity": "region", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 20, "cast_gt_registered": 20}, "n_stations_flagged": 20, "created_at": "2026-07-13T00:00:18.012255", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.686, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.294, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.265, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.134, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.686, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.294, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.474, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.206, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.692, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.173, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.196, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.62, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.155, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.265, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.265, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.134, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.206, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.206, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.521, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.159, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.159, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.707, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.707, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.389, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.389, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 20}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "86adc0cfb2f7470b8db9e3dec2123aa3", "name": "Chile 2025 presidential_r1 (overnight chile_2025_presidential_r1.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Chile", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://elecciones.servel.cl/ (SERVEL Vite SPA, primera votacion 16-Nov-2025; per-mesa nomina zip + territorios/candidaturas, same channel as the R2 segundavotacion.servel.cl build). Long-format capture staged at chile-elections/output/chile_2025_presidente.parquet (327,200 rows = 40,900 mesas x 8 c", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"jara_jeannette": "jara_jeannette", "kast_jose_antonio": "kast_jose_antonio", "parisi_franco": "parisi_franco", "kaiser_johannes": "kaiser_johannes", "matthei_evelyn": "matthei_evelyn", "mayne_nicholls_harold": "mayne_nicholls_harold", "enriquez_ominami_marco": "enriquez_ominami_marco", "artes_eduardo": "artes_eduardo"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40900, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 46}, "n_stations_flagged": 46, "created_at": "2026-07-12T23:54:46.902208", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.841, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.921, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.839, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.781, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.727, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.64, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.64, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.075, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.075, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 40900}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "08f797c4939e4849981d3df592f4650a", "name": "Turkey 2023 presidential (overnight turkey_2023_presidential-r1.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Turkey", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/erdemcapci/elections", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"erdogan": "erdogan", "kilicdaroglu": "kilicdaroglu", "ogan": "ogan", "ince": "ince"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1100, "granularity": "county", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1097, "registered_not_positive": 1100}, "n_stations_flagged": 1100, "created_at": "2026-07-12T23:54:30.804259", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.462, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.85, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.285, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.108, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.462, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.474, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.747, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.366, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.342, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.995, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.222, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.285, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.285, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.108, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.108, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.193, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.388, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.178, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.178, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.177, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.177, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1100}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9735afe5d1994c07b3678d0b8826799c", "name": "Russia 2021 parliamentary (overnight russia_2021_duma.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/dkobak/elections/blob/master/data/2021.csv.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"KPRF": "KPRF", "Greens (Zelyonye)": "Greens (Zelyonye)", "LDPR": "LDPR", "New People": "New People", "United Russia": "United Russia", "Just Russia - For Truth": "Just Russia - For Truth", "Yabloko": "Yabloko", "Party of Growth": "Party of Growth", "Russian Party of Freedom and Justice": "Russian Party of Freedom and Justice", "Communists of Russia": "Communists of Russia", "Civic Platform": "Civic Platform", "Green Alternative": "Green Alternative", "Rodina": "Rodina", "Party of Pensioners": "Party of Pensioners"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 96325, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 17}, "n_stations_flagged": 17, "created_at": "2026-07-12T23:39:39.504090", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.482, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.616, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.245, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.094, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.482, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.616, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.566, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.039, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.26, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.112, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.286, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.01, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.253, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.245, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.245, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.094, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.094, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.188, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.188, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.424, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.701, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.271, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.271, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 96325}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "585b5362d3c84b8c8d3e94073cb5cf43", "name": "Russia 2012 presidential (overnight russia_2012_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 2012, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/dkobak/elections/blob/master/data/2012.csv.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Zhirinovsky": "Zhirinovsky", "Zyuganov": "Zyuganov", "Mironov": "Mironov", "Prokhorov": "Prokhorov", "Putin": "Putin"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 95415, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T23:16:10.979654", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.032, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.499, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.278, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.122, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.032, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.508, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.499, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.034, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.259, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.226, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.451, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.108, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.277, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.278, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.278, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.122, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.122, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.216, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.216, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.107, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.107, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "United Russia", "winner_candidate": "Vladimir Putin", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Communist Party of the Russian Federation", "margin": 46.42, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "RUS", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 95415}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2bc6bed34320429f9a0a4e77cc0d488e", "name": "Russia 2011 parliamentary (overnight russia_2011_duma.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/dkobak/elections/raw/master/data/2011.csv.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"just_russia": "just_russia", "ldpr": "ldpr", "patriots_of_russia": "patriots_of_russia", "kprf": "kprf", "yabloko": "yabloko", "united_russia": "united_russia", "right_cause": "right_cause"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 95225, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T23:11:45.621530", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.737, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.331, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.299, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.134, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.331, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.583, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.205, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.608, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.152, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.313, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.451, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.108, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.277, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.299, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.299, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.134, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.225, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.225, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.125, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.125, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.429, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "United Russia", "winner_candidate": "Vladimir Putin", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Communist Party of the Russian Federation", "margin": 46.42, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "RUS", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 95225}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f33c6bd0715f4cb3a034b235be7a6a4d", "name": "Russia 2018 presidential (overnight russia_2018_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 2018, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/dkobak/elections/raw/master/data/2018.csv.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Baburin": "Baburin", "Grudinin": "Grudinin", "Zhirinovsky": "Zhirinovsky", "Putin": "Putin", "Sobchak": "Sobchak", "Suraykin": "Suraykin", "Titov": "Titov", "Yavlinsky": "Yavlinsky"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 97699, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T23:07:14.185518", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.947, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.597, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.264, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.107, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.947, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.487, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.016, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.254, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.027, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.257, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.337, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.074, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.269, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.264, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.264, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.107, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.107, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.466, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.466, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.305, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.305, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "All-Russia People's Front (ONF)", "winner_candidate": "Vladimir Putin", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Communist Party of the Russian Federation", "margin": 64.92, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "RUS", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 97699}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "14b8a3d5da5047b892a5ba7954bccbbe", "name": "Russia 2024 presidential (overnight russia_2024_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/dkobak/elections (data/2024.csv.zip; scraped by Ivan Shukshin from vybory.izbirkom.ru CEC GAS-Vybory)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Putin": "Putin", "Kharitonov": "Kharitonov", "Davankov": "Davankov", "Slutsky": "Slutsky"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 91946, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 7}, "n_stations_flagged": 7, "created_at": "2026-07-12T23:02:37.968861", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.008, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.593, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.171, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.057, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.008, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.252, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.593, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 0.656, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.164, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.127, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.262, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.066, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.253, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.233, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.171, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.171, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.057, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.057, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.129, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.129, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.26, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.26, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.046, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.046, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.795, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.08, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.08, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 91946}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "06d095bffef744a696ff1dfa80f79132", "name": "Moldova 2024 presidential (overnight moldova_2024_presidential_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Moldova", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://rezultate.cec.md/api/api/GetReport?electionId=10083&electionRoundId=20170&electionCircumscriptionId={circ}&region={region}&number={stationKey}", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"sandu_maia": "sandu_maia", "stoianoglo_alexandr": "stoianoglo_alexandr"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2218, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T23:02:20.749572", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.688, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.196, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.622, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.503, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.196, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.274, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.527, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.382, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.425, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.31, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.388, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.622, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.503, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.493, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.493, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.325, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.325, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.674, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2218}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "113f594552da41aabb44bd3631f83e70", "name": "Moldova 2024 presidential (overnight moldova_2024_presidential_r1.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Moldova", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://rezultate.cec.md/api/api/GetReport?electionId=10083&electionRoundId=20166&electionCircumscriptionId={circ}&region={region}&number={stationKey}", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"sandu_maia": "sandu_maia", "stoianoglo_alexandr": "stoianoglo_alexandr", "usatii_renato": "usatii_renato", "vlah_irina": "vlah_irina", "tarlev_vasile": "tarlev_vasile", "chicu_ion": "chicu_ion", "furtuna_victoria": "furtuna_victoria", "ticu_octavian": "ticu_octavian", "morari_natalia": "morari_natalia", "ulianovschi_tudor": "ulianovschi_tudor", "nastase_andrei": "nastase_andrei"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2218, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T23:02:09.707620", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.688, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.196, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.622, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.503, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.196, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.274, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.527, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.382, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.425, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.31, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.388, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.622, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.503, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.493, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.493, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.325, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.325, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.674, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2218}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9645b33f89134b15b052893a20d6ea51", "name": "Mauritius 2014 parliamentary (overnight mu_2014_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mauritius", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "BLOCK VOTING: 3-member constituencies (Rodrigues 2): each voter casts up to 3 candidate-votes, so sum(candidates)/valid ballots = 2-3 by design. Do not reconcile candidate sums against ballots/registered. https://www.electionpassport.com/files/MU/MU.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ind-v1": "ind-v1", "ind-v2": "ind-v2", "ind-v3": "ind-v3", "ind-v4": "ind-v4", "ind-v5": "ind-v5", "ind-v6": "ind-v6", "ind-v7": "ind-v7", "ind-v8": "ind-v8", "ind-v9": "ind-v9", "ind-v10": "ind-v10", "ind-v11": "ind-v11", "ind-v12": "ind-v12", "ind-v13": "ind-v13", "ind-v14": "ind-v14", "ind-v15": "ind-v15", "ind-v16": "ind-v16", "ind-v17": "ind-v17", "ind-v18": "ind-v18", "ind-v19": "ind-v19", "ind-v20": "ind-v20", "ind-v21": "ind-v21", "ind-v22": "ind-v22", "ind-v23": "ind-v23", "ind-v24": "ind-v24", "ind-v25": "ind-v25", "ind-v26": "ind-v26", "ind-v27": "ind-v27", "ind-v28": "ind-v28", "ind-v29": "ind-v29", "ind-v30": "ind-v30", "ind-v31": "ind-v31", "ind-v32": "ind-v32", "ind-v33": "ind-v33", "ind-v34": "ind-v34", "ind-v35": "ind-v35", "ind-v36": "ind-v36", "ind-v37": "ind-v37", "ind-v38": "ind-v38", "ind-v39": "ind-v39", "ind-v40": "ind-v40", "ind-v41": "ind-v41", "ifb-v1": "ifb-v1", "mmr-v1": "mmr-v1", "opr-v1": "opr-v1", "opr-v2": "opr-v2", "fln-v1": "fln-v1", "fln-v2": "fln-v2", "l-v1": "l-v1", "l-v2": "l-v2", "l-v3": "l-v3", "ppm-v1": "ppm-v1", "ppm-v2": "ppm-v2", "ppm-v3": "ppm-v3", "apt-v1": "apt-v1", "apt-v2": "apt-v2", "apt-v3": "apt-v3", "pal-c1": "pal-c1", "pal-c2": "pal-c2", "pal-c3": "pal-c3", "dm-v1": "dm-v1", "dm-v2": "dm-v2", "dm-v3": "dm-v3", "mtm-v1": "mtm-v1", "mtm-v2": "mtm-v2", "mtm-v3": "mtm-v3", "mr-v1": "mr-v1", "mr-v2": "mr-v2", "cam-v1": "cam-v1", "cam-v2": "cam-v2", "mam-v1": "mam-v1", "mam-v2": "mam-v2", "mam-v3": "mam-v3", "fsm-v1": "fsm-v1", "fsm-v2": "fsm-v2", "fsm-v3": "fsm-v3", "rsm-v1": "rsm-v1", "rsm-v2": "rsm-v2", "ra-v1": "ra-v1", "mal-v1": "mal-v1", "mal-v2": "mal-v2", "upm-v1": "upm-v1", "fcl-v1": "fcl-v1", "fcl-v2": "fcl-v2", "fcl-v3": "fcl-v3", "fsoc-v1": "fsoc-v1", "fsoc-v2": "fsoc-v2", "fsoc-v3": "fsoc-v3", "vf-v1": "vf-v1", "vf-v2": "vf-v2", "vf-v3": "vf-v3", "ptd-v1": "ptd-v1", "ptd-v2": "ptd-v2", "ptd-v3": "ptd-v3", "upb-v1": "upb-v1", "upb-v2": "upb-v2", "upb-v3": "upb-v3", "man-v1": "man-v1", "fpr-v1": "fpr-v1", "fpr-v2": "fpr-v2", "cnm-v1": "cnm-v1", "edp-v1": "edp-v1", "edp-v2": "edp-v2", "ens-v1": "ens-v1", "fcp-v1": "fcp-v1", "fpm-v1-1": "fpm-v1-1", "lep-v1": "lep-v1", "lep-v2": "lep-v2", "lep-v3": "lep-v3", "mng-v1": "mng-v1", "mng-v2": "mng-v2", "mng-v3": "mng-v3", "lem-v1": "lem-v1", "lem-v2": "lem-v2", "lem-v3": "lem-v3", "mmsd-v1": "mmsd-v1", "mmsd-v2": "mmsd-v2", "mmsd-v3": "mmsd-v3", "lib-v1": "lib-v1", "msn-v1": "msn-v1", "mesd-v1": "mesd-v1", "mesd-v2": "mesd-v2", "mesd-v3": "mesd-v3", "mir-v1": "mir-v1", "mir-v2": "mir-v2", "trav-v1": "trav-v1", "trav-v2": "trav-v2", "trav-v3": "trav-v3", "pjs-v1": "pjs-v1", "pjs-v2": "pjs-v2", "poor-v1": "poor-v1", "poor-v2": "poor-v2", "poor-v3": "poor-v3", "rdj-v1": "rdj-v1", "tlib-v1": "tlib-v1", "zwa-v1": "zwa-v1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 21, "registered_not_positive": 21, "cast_gt_registered": 21}, "n_stations_flagged": 21, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:21:19.452013", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.707, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.723, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.617, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.707, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.576, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.377, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.477, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.369, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.617, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.617, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.587, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.44, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2c1e74c27ffb4632885d259e2f7c59c5", "name": "Mauritius 2010 parliamentary (overnight mu_2010_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mauritius", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "BLOCK VOTING: 3-member constituencies (Rodrigues 2): each voter casts up to 3 candidate-votes, so sum(candidates)/valid ballots = 2-3 by design. Do not reconcile candidate sums against ballots/registered. https://www.electionpassport.com/files/MU/MU.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ind-v1": "ind-v1", "ind-v2": "ind-v2", "ind-v3": "ind-v3", "ind-v4": "ind-v4", "ind-v5": "ind-v5", "ind-v6": "ind-v6", "ind-v7": "ind-v7", "ind-v8": "ind-v8", "ind-v9": "ind-v9", "ind-v10": "ind-v10", "ind-v11": "ind-v11", "ind-v12": "ind-v12", "ind-v13": "ind-v13", "ind-v14": "ind-v14", "ind-v15": "ind-v15", "ind-v16": "ind-v16", "ind-v17": "ind-v17", "ind-v18": "ind-v18", "ind-v19": "ind-v19", "ind-v20": "ind-v20", "mmr-v1": "mmr-v1", "opr-v1": "opr-v1", "opr-v2": "opr-v2", "msmt-v1": "msmt-v1", "msmt-v2": "msmt-v2", "msmt-v3": "msmt-v3", "mdm-v1": "mdm-v1", "mdm-v2": "mdm-v2", "mdm-v3": "mdm-v3", "ppm-v1": "ppm-v1", "ppm-v2": "ppm-v2", "ppm-v3": "ppm-v3", "mts-v1": "mts-v1", "pal-v1": "pal-v1", "pal-v2": "pal-v2", "pal-v3": "pal-v3", "dm-v1": "dm-v1", "dm-v2": "dm-v2", "mtm-v1": "mtm-v1", "mdl-v1": "mdl-v1", "mdl-v2": "mdl-v2", "mr-v1": "mr-v1", "mr-v2": "mr-v2", "mdn-v1": "mdn-v1", "mdn-v2": "mdn-v2", "mdn-v3": "mdn-v3", "mam-v1": "mam-v1", "mam-v2": "mam-v2", "mam-v3": "mam-v3", "fsm-v1": "fsm-v1", "fsm-v2": "fsm-v2", "fsm-v3": "fsm-v3", "rsm-v1": "rsm-v1", "cinq-v1": "cinq-v1", "mal-v1": "mal-v1", "mal-v2": "mal-v2", "upm-v1": "upm-v1", "mra-v1": "mra-v1", "fppr-v1": "fppr-v1", "fppr-v2": "fppr-v2", "amum-v1": "amum-v1", "amum-v2": "amum-v2", "amum-v3": "amum-v3", "fcl-v1": "fcl-v1", "fsoc-v1": "fsoc-v1", "fsoc-v2": "fsoc-v2", "fsoc-v3": "fsoc-v3", "vf-v1": "vf-v1", "vf-v2": "vf-v2", "vf-v3": "vf-v3", "mcm-v1": "mcm-v1", "mcm-v2": "mcm-v2", "mcm-v3": "mcm-v3", "prt-v1": "prt-v1", "prt-v2": "prt-v2", "psm-v1": "psm-v1", "ptd-v1": "ptd-v1", "ptd-v2": "ptd-v2", "ptd-v3": "ptd-v3", "plus-v1": "plus-v1", "plus-v2": "plus-v2", "plm-v1": "plm-v1", "ram-v1": "ram-v1", "rjsd-v1": "rjsd-v1", "slp-v1": "slp-v1", "slp-v2": "slp-v2", "udr-v1": "udr-v1", "udr-v2": "udr-v2", "upb-v1": "upb-v1", "upb-v2": "upb-v2", "upb-v3": "upb-v3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 21, "registered_not_positive": 21, "cast_gt_registered": 21}, "n_stations_flagged": 21, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:21:19.035534", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.464, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.77, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.746, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.655, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.77, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.516, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.029, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.539, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.385, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.746, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.655, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.424, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "428b04dbb9ca4f6580aab52ae2e4eb64", "name": "Mauritius 2005 parliamentary (overnight mu_2005_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mauritius", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "BLOCK VOTING: 3-member constituencies (Rodrigues 2): each voter casts up to 3 candidate-votes, so sum(candidates)/valid ballots = 2-3 by design. Do not reconcile candidate sums against ballots/registered. https://www.electionpassport.com/files/MU/MU.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ind-v1": "ind-v1", "ind-v2": "ind-v2", "ind-v3": "ind-v3", "ind-v4": "ind-v4", "ind-v5": "ind-v5", "ind-v6": "ind-v6", "ind-v7": "ind-v7", "ind-v8": "ind-v8", "ind-v9": "ind-v9", "ind-v10": "ind-v10", "ind-v11": "ind-v11", "ind-v12": "ind-v12", "ind-v13": "ind-v13", "ind-v14": "ind-v14", "ind-v15": "ind-v15", "ind-v16": "ind-v16", "ind-v17": "ind-v17", "ind-v18": "ind-v18", "ind-v19": "ind-v19", "ind-v20": "ind-v20", "ind-v21": "ind-v21", "ind-v22": "ind-v22", "ifb-v1": "ifb-v1", "mmr-v1": "mmr-v1", "opr-v1": "opr-v1", "opr-v2": "opr-v2", "mdm-v1": "mdm-v1", "mdm-v2": "mdm-v2", "mdm-v3": "mdm-v3", "l-v1": "l-v1", "l-v2": "l-v2", "l-v3": "l-v3", "ppm-v1": "ppm-v1", "ppm-v2": "ppm-v2", "ppm-v3": "ppm-v3", "mts-v1": "mts-v1", "amsm-v1": "amsm-v1", "amsm-v2": "amsm-v2", "amsm-v3": "amsm-v3", "fpm-v1": "fpm-v1", "fpm-v2": "fpm-v2", "fpm-v3": "fpm-v3", "dm-v1": "dm-v1", "mtm-v1": "mtm-v1", "mdl-v1": "mdl-v1", "mdl-v2": "mdl-v2", "mr-v1": "mr-v1", "mr-v2": "mr-v2", "mnm-v1": "mnm-v1", "mnm-v2": "mnm-v2", "mnm-v3": "mnm-v3", "mdn-v1": "mdn-v1", "mdn-v2": "mdn-v2", "mdn-v3": "mdn-v3", "um-v1": "um-v1", "tc-v1": "tc-v1", "tc-v2": "tc-v2", "tc-v3": "tc-v3", "soc-v1": "soc-v1", "soc-v2": "soc-v2", "soc-v3": "soc-v3", "fsm-v1": "fsm-v1", "fsm-v2": "fsm-v2", "fsm-v3": "fsm-v3", "msi-v1": "msi-v1", "msi-v2": "msi-v2", "msi-v3": "msi-v3", "dusm-v1": "dusm-v1", "dusm-v2": "dusm-v2", "apj-v1": "apj-v1", "apj-v2": "apj-v2", "mpe-v1": "mpe-v1", "mpe-v2": "mpe-v2", "mpe-v3": "mpe-v3", "mp-v1": "mp-v1", "rsm-v1": "rsm-v1", "rsm-v2": "rsm-v2", "cinq-v1": "cinq-v1", "cinq-v2": "cinq-v2", "cinq-v3": "cinq-v3", "camm-v1": "camm-v1", "camm-v2": "camm-v2", "camm-v3": "camm-v3", "ra-v1": "ra-v1", "ra-v2": "ra-v2", "ra-v3": "ra-v3", "tdvr-v1": "tdvr-v1", "pro-v1": "pro-v1", "cp-v1": "cp-v1", "cp-v2": "cp-v2", "cp-v3": "cp-v3", "ekta-v1": "ekta-v1", "ekta-v2": "ekta-v2", "ekta-v3": "ekta-v3", "mal-v1": "mal-v1", "mal-v2": "mal-v2", "mal-v3": "mal-v3", "rts-v1": "rts-v1", "upm-v1": "upm-v1", "mra-v1": "mra-v1", "rrr-v1": "rrr-v1", "fppr-v1": "fppr-v1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 21, "cast_gt_registered": 21, "votes_gt_valid": 21}, "n_stations_flagged": 21, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:21:18.694082", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.727, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.772, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.737, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.644, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.727, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.518, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.324, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.703, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.543, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.386, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.644, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.644, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.591, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.465, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.465, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cdc1e5dfd2434a739ae5bf46f25d7528", "name": "Mauritius 2000 parliamentary (overnight mu_2000_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mauritius", "year": 2000, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "BLOCK VOTING: 3-member constituencies (Rodrigues 2): each voter casts up to 3 candidate-votes, so sum(candidates)/valid ballots = 2-3 by design. Do not reconcile candidate sums against ballots/registered. https://www.electionpassport.com/files/MU/MU.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ind-v1": "ind-v1", "ind-v2": "ind-v2", "ind-v3": "ind-v3", "ind-v4": "ind-v4", "ind-v5": "ind-v5", "ind-v6": "ind-v6", "ind-v7": "ind-v7", "ind-v8": "ind-v8", "ind-v9": "ind-v9", "ind-v10": "ind-v10", "ind-v11": "ind-v11", "ind-v12": "ind-v12", "ind-v13": "ind-v13", "ind-v14": "ind-v14", "ind-v15": "ind-v15", "ind-v16": "ind-v16", "ind-v17": "ind-v17", "ind-v18": "ind-v18", "ind-v19": "ind-v19", "ind-v20": "ind-v20", "ind-v21": "ind-v21", "ind-v22": "ind-v22", "ind-v23": "ind-v23", "mmr-v1": "mmr-v1", "opr-v1": "opr-v1", "opr-v2": "opr-v2", "mdm-v1": "mdm-v1", "mdm-v2": "mdm-v2", "mdm-v3": "mdm-v3", "l-v1": "l-v1", "ppm-v1": "ppm-v1", "ppm-v2": "ppm-v2", "ppm-v3": "ppm-v3", "mts-v1": "mts-v1", "amsm-v1": "amsm-v1", "amsm-v2": "amsm-v2", "amsm-v3": "amsm-v3", "hiz-v1": "hiz-v1", "hiz-v2": "hiz-v2", "hiz-v3": "hiz-v3", "pal-v1": "pal-v1", "pal-v2": "pal-v2", "dm-v1": "dm-v1", "dm-v2": "dm-v2", "dm-v3": "dm-v3", "mr-v1": "mr-v1", "mr-v2": "mr-v2", "aptx-v1": "aptx-v1", "aptx-v2": "aptx-v2", "aptx-v3": "aptx-v3", "nl-v1": "nl-v1", "nl-v2": "nl-v2", "mnm-v1": "mnm-v1", "mnm-v2": "mnm-v2", "mnm-v3": "mnm-v3", "mdn-v1": "mdn-v1", "mdn-v2": "mdn-v2", "mdn-v3": "mdn-v3", "cam-v1": "cam-v1", "cam-v2": "cam-v2", "cam-v3": "cam-v3", "mam-v1": "mam-v1", "mam-v2": "mam-v2", "mam-v3": "mam-v3", "um-v1": "um-v1", "mpa-v1": "mpa-v1", "mpa-v2": "mpa-v2", "mpa-v3": "mpa-v3", "tc-v1": "tc-v1", "tc-v2": "tc-v2", "tc-v3": "tc-v3", "pmxd-v1": "pmxd-v1", "pmxd-v2": "pmxd-v2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 21, "registered_not_positive": 21, "votes_gt_valid": 21}, "n_stations_flagged": 21, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:21:18.335064", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.807, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.73, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.641, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.807, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.358, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.703, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.837, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.73, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.73, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.585, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.585, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.899, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.465, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.465, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e11ef5e92d164b7c973a2e0505ac2238", "name": "Mauritius 1995 parliamentary (overnight mu_1995_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mauritius", "year": 1995, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "BLOCK VOTING: 3-member constituencies (Rodrigues 2): each voter casts up to 3 candidate-votes, so sum(candidates)/valid ballots = 2-3 by design. Do not reconcile candidate sums against ballots/registered. https://www.electionpassport.com/files/MU/MU.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ind-v1": "ind-v1", "ind-v2": "ind-v2", "ind-v3": "ind-v3", "ind-v4": "ind-v4", "ind-v5": "ind-v5", "ind-v6": "ind-v6", "ind-v7": "ind-v7", "ind-v8": "ind-v8", "ind-v9": "ind-v9", "ind-v10": "ind-v10", "ind-v11": "ind-v11", "ind-v12": "ind-v12", "ind-v13": "ind-v13", "ind-v14": "ind-v14", "ind-v15": "ind-v15", "ind-v16": "ind-v16", "ind-v17": "ind-v17", "ind-v18": "ind-v18", "ind-v19": "ind-v19", "mup-v1": "mup-v1", "mmr-v1": "mmr-v1", "opr-v1": "opr-v1", "opr-v2": "opr-v2", "mdm-v1": "mdm-v1", "mdm-v2": "mdm-v2", "mdm-v3": "mdm-v3", "ppm-v1": "ppm-v1", "ppm-v2": "ppm-v2", "ppm-v3": "ppm-v3", "mss-v1": "mss-v1", "mss-v2": "mss-v2", "hiz-v1": "hiz-v1", "pal-v1": "pal-v1", "apt-v1-1": "apt-v1-1", "apt-v2-1": "apt-v2-1", "apt-v3-1": "apt-v3-1", "pgd-v1": "pgd-v1", "pgd-v2": "pgd-v2", "pgd-v3": "pgd-v3", "armm-v1": "armm-v1", "armm-v2": "armm-v2", "armm-v3": "armm-v3", "pln-v1": "pln-v1", "pln-v2": "pln-v2", "mmph-v1": "mmph-v1", "mmph-v2": "mmph-v2", "mmph-v3": "mmph-v3", "mmsm-v1": "mmsm-v1", "mmsm-v2": "mmsm-v2", "mmsm-v3": "mmsm-v3", "rep-v1": "rep-v1", "fpm-v1": "fpm-v1", "fpm-v2": "fpm-v2", "fpm-v3": "fpm-v3", "mpj-v1": "mpj-v1", "mpj-v2": "mpj-v2", "dm-v1": "dm-v1", "dm-v2": "dm-v2", "dm-v3": "dm-v3", "head-v1": "head-v1", "head-v2": "head-v2", "mtm-v1": "mtm-v1", "mdl-v1": "mdl-v1", "mdl-v2": "mdl-v2", "mdl-v3": "mdl-v3", "mmp-v1": "mmp-v1", "mmp-v2": "mmp-v2", "mr-v1": "mr-v1", "mr-v2": "mr-v2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 21, "registered_not_positive": 21, "cast_gt_registered": 21}, "n_stations_flagged": 21, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:21:18.024742", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.806, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.725, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.619, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.806, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.448, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.362, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.703, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.461, "year": 1995, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.725, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.725, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.619, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.564, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.564, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.465, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.465, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "48233759f4fc44fd8752d374d4759562", "name": "Mauritius 1991 parliamentary (overnight mu_1991_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mauritius", "year": 1991, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "BLOCK VOTING: 3-member constituencies (Rodrigues 2): each voter casts up to 3 candidate-votes, so sum(candidates)/valid ballots = 2-3 by design. Do not reconcile candidate sums against ballots/registered. https://www.electionpassport.com/files/MU/MU.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ind-v1": "ind-v1", "ind-v2": "ind-v2", "ind-v3": "ind-v3", "ind-v4": "ind-v4", "ind-v5": "ind-v5", "ind-v6": "ind-v6", "ind-v7": "ind-v7", "ind-v8": "ind-v8", "ind-v9": "ind-v9", "ind-v10": "ind-v10", "ind-v11": "ind-v11", "ind-v12": "ind-v12", "ind-v13": "ind-v13", "ind-v14": "ind-v14", "ind-v15": "ind-v15", "cpm-v1": "cpm-v1", "cpm-v2": "cpm-v2", "cpm-v3": "cpm-v3", "mup-v1": "mup-v1", "mmr-v1": "mmr-v1", "pdp-v1": "pdp-v1", "opr-v1": "opr-v1", "opr-v2": "opr-v2", "ppm-v1": "ppm-v1", "ppm-v2": "ppm-v2", "ppm-v3": "ppm-v3", "gss-v1": "gss-v1", "ftm-v1": "ftm-v1", "mss-n2": "mss-n2", "mss-n3": "mss-n3", "oum-n1": "oum-n1", "rpr-v1": "rpr-v1", "rpr-v2": "rpr-v2", "amsm-v1": "amsm-v1", "amsm-v2": "amsm-v2", "amsm-v3": "amsm-v3", "apt-v1": "apt-v1", "apt-v2": "apt-v2", "apt-v3": "apt-v3", "pmt-v1": "pmt-v1", "pmt-v2": "pmt-v2", "pmt-v3": "pmt-v3", "fts-v1": "fts-v1", "fts-v2": "fts-v2", "fts-v3": "fts-v3", "hiz-v1": "hiz-v1", "hiz-v2": "hiz-v2", "hiz-v3": "hiz-v3", "pal-v1": "pal-v1", "pal-v2": "pal-v2", "pal-v3": "pal-v3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 21, "registered_not_positive": 21, "votes_gt_valid": 21}, "n_stations_flagged": 21, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:21:17.724955", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.804, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.422, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.72, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.605, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.422, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.436, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.369, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.703, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.826, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 1991, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.72, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.72, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.56, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.465, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.465, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2101382be6c34803ade854a164204eaa", "name": "Mauritius 1987 parliamentary (overnight mu_1987_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mauritius", "year": 1987, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "BLOCK VOTING: 3-member constituencies (Rodrigues 2): each voter casts up to 3 candidate-votes, so sum(candidates)/valid ballots = 2-3 by design. Do not reconcile candidate sums against ballots/registered. https://www.electionpassport.com/files/MU/MU.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pmsd-v1": "pmsd-v1", "pmsd-v2": "pmsd-v2", "pmsd-v3": "pmsd-v3", "ind-v1": "ind-v1", "ind-v2": "ind-v2", "ind-v3": "ind-v3", "ind-v4": "ind-v4", "ind-v5": "ind-v5", "ind-v6": "ind-v6", "ind-v7": "ind-v7", "ind-v8": "ind-v8", "ind-v9": "ind-v9", "ind-v10": "ind-v10", "ind-v11": "ind-v11", "ind-v12": "ind-v12", "ind-v13": "ind-v13", "ind-v14": "ind-v14", "ind-v15": "ind-v15", "mup-v1": "mup-v1", "mmr-v1": "mmr-v1", "mmr-v2": "mmr-v2", "pdp-v1": "pdp-v1", "opr-v1": "opr-v1", "opr-v2": "opr-v2", "msmt-v1": "msmt-v1", "msmt-v2": "msmt-v2", "msmt-v3": "msmt-v3", "l-v1": "l-v1", "l-v2": "l-v2", "l-v3": "l-v3", "ppm-v1": "ppm-v1", "ppm-v2": "ppm-v2", "ppm-v3": "ppm-v3", "ummm-v1": "ummm-v1", "ummm-v2": "ummm-v2", "ummm-v3": "ummm-v3", "am-v1": "am-v1", "am-v2": "am-v2", "am-v3": "am-v3", "red-v1": "red-v1", "red-v2": "red-v2", "red-v3": "red-v3", "mem-v1": "mem-v1", "mem-v2": "mem-v2", "mem-v3": "mem-v3", "omt-v1": "omt-v1", "omt-v2": "omt-v2", "omt-v3": "omt-v3", "gmf-v1": "gmf-v1", "mts-v1": "mts-v1", "mts-v2": "mts-v2", "mts-v3": "mts-v3", "ftm-v1": "ftm-v1", "mpm-v1": "mpm-v1", "msp-v1": "msp-v1", "msp-v2": "msp-v2", "msp-v3": "msp-v3", "mss-v1": "mss-v1", "mss-v2": "mss-v2", "mss-v3": "mss-v3", "oum-v1": "oum-v1", "oum-v2": "oum-v2", "pnm-v1": "pnm-v1", "rpr-v1": "rpr-v1", "rpr-v2": "rpr-v2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 21, "cast_gt_registered": 21, "registered_not_positive": 21}, "n_stations_flagged": 21, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:21:17.462765", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.804, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.918, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.708, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.609, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.441, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.352, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.703, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.142, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 1987, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.609, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 1987, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.549, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 1987, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.541, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.541, "year": 1987, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e585530a4aa64ce1ba04c5135972fe4f", "name": "Mauritius 1983 parliamentary (overnight mu_1983_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mauritius", "year": 1983, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "BLOCK VOTING: 3-member constituencies (Rodrigues 2): each voter casts up to 3 candidate-votes, so sum(candidates)/valid ballots = 2-3 by design. Do not reconcile candidate sums against ballots/registered. https://www.electionpassport.com/files/MU/MU.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pmsd-v1": "pmsd-v1", "pmsd-v2": "pmsd-v2", "pmsd-v3": "pmsd-v3", "ind-v1": "ind-v1", "ind-v2": "ind-v2", "ind-v3": "ind-v3", "ind-v4": "ind-v4", "ind-v5": "ind-v5", "ind-v6": "ind-v6", "ind-v7": "ind-v7", "ind-v8": "ind-v8", "ind-v9": "ind-v9", "ind-v10": "ind-v10", "ind-v11": "ind-v11", "mmm-v1": "mmm-v1", "mmm-v2": "mmm-v2", "mmm-v3": "mmm-v3", "cpm-v1": "cpm-v1", "cpm-v2": "cpm-v2", "cpm-v3": "cpm-v3", "mmr-v1": "mmr-v1", "mmr-v2": "mmr-v2", "opr-v1": "opr-v1", "opr-v2": "opr-v2", "msmt-v1": "msmt-v1", "msmt-v2": "msmt-v2", "msmt-v3": "msmt-v3", "gm-v1": "gm-v1", "gm-v2": "gm-v2", "gm-v3": "gm-v3", "mdm-v1": "mdm-v1", "mdm-v2": "mdm-v2", "mdm-v3": "mdm-v3", "pop-v1": "pop-v1", "pop-v2": "pop-v2", "pop-v3": "pop-v3", "pop-v4": "pop-v4", "pop-v5": "pop-v5", "pop-v6": "pop-v6", "fmi-v1": "fmi-v1", "fmi-v2": "fmi-v2", "fmi-v3": "fmi-v3", "fmi-v4": "fmi-v4", "fmi-v5": "fmi-v5", "fmi-v6": "fmi-v6", "l-v1": "l-v1", "l-v2": "l-v2", "l-v3": "l-v3", "mlm-v1": "mlm-v1", "mlm-v2": "mlm-v2", "mlm-v3": "mlm-v3", "gp-v1": "gp-v1", "gp-v2": "gp-v2", "gp-v3": "gp-v3", "ppm-v1": "ppm-v1", "gss-v1": "gss-v1", "gss-v2": "gss-v2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 21, "cast_gt_registered": 21, "registered_not_positive": 21}, "n_stations_flagged": 21, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:21:17.164434", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.921, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.7, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.601, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.465, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.52, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.703, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 1983, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.7, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.601, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.601, "year": 1983, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 1983, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.541, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.541, "year": 1983, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6aaeda9c99b7490da44847aaacca4e2d", "name": "Mauritius 1982 parliamentary (overnight mu_1982_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mauritius", "year": 1982, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "BLOCK VOTING: 3-member constituencies (Rodrigues 2): each voter casts up to 3 candidate-votes, so sum(candidates)/valid ballots = 2-3 by design. Do not reconcile candidate sums against ballots/registered. https://www.electionpassport.com/files/MU/MU.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pmsd-v1": "pmsd-v1", "pmsd-v2": "pmsd-v2", "pmsd-v3": "pmsd-v3", "pmsd-v4": "pmsd-v4", "pr-v1": "pr-v1", "ind-v1": "ind-v1", "ind-v2": "ind-v2", "ind-v3": "ind-v3", "ind-v4": "ind-v4", "ind-v5": "ind-v5", "ind-v6": "ind-v6", "ind-v7": "ind-v7", "ind-v8": "ind-v8", "ind-v9": "ind-v9", "ind-v10": "ind-v10", "ind-v11": "ind-v11", "ind-v12": "ind-v12", "ind-v13": "ind-v13", "ind-v14": "ind-v14", "ind-v15": "ind-v15", "ind-v16": "ind-v16", "ind-v17": "ind-v17", "udm-v1": "udm-v1", "udm-v2": "udm-v2", "udm-v3": "udm-v3", "pcr-v1": "pcr-v1", "pcr-v2": "pcr-v2", "opr-v1": "opr-v1", "opr-v2": "opr-v2", "ammm-v1": "ammm-v1", "ammm-v2": "ammm-v2", "ammm-v3": "ammm-v3", "pan-v1": "pan-v1", "pan-v2": "pan-v2", "pan-v3": "pan-v3", "zs-v1": "zs-v1", "pim-v1": "pim-v1", "pim-v2": "pim-v2", "pim-v3": "pim-v3", "opm-v1": "opm-v1", "fln-v1": "fln-v1", "fln-v2": "fln-v2", "mylm-v1": "mylm-v1", "mylm-v2": "mylm-v2", "mln-v1": "mln-v1", "mln-v2": "mln-v2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 21, "registered_not_positive": 21, "votes_gt_valid": 21}, "n_stations_flagged": 21, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:21:16.881412", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.804, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.923, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.7, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.601, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.923, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.437, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.363, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 1982, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.703, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.839, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.46, "year": 1982, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.7, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 1982, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.601, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.601, "year": 1982, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.55, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 1982, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 1982, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.541, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.541, "year": 1982, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 1982, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2b446f6def7843978d0f7b56cbd9783f", "name": "Mauritius 1976 parliamentary (overnight mu_1976_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mauritius", "year": 1976, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "BLOCK VOTING: 3-member constituencies (Rodrigues 2): each voter casts up to 3 candidate-votes, so sum(candidates)/valid ballots = 2-3 by design. Do not reconcile candidate sums against ballots/registered. https://www.electionpassport.com/files/MU/MU.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pmsd-v1": "pmsd-v1", "pmsd-v2": "pmsd-v2", "pmsd-v3": "pmsd-v3", "ip-v1": "ip-v1", "ip-v2": "ip-v2", "ip-v3": "ip-v3", "ind-v1": "ind-v1", "ind-v2": "ind-v2", "ind-v3": "ind-v3", "ind-v4": "ind-v4", "ind-v5": "ind-v5", "ind-v6": "ind-v6", "ind-v7": "ind-v7", "ind-v8": "ind-v8", "mmm-v1": "mmm-v1", "mmm-v2": "mmm-v2", "mmm-v3": "mmm-v3", "udm-v1": "udm-v1", "udm-v2": "udm-v2", "udm-v3": "udm-v3", "mmsp-v1": "mmsp-v1", "mmsp-v2": "mmsp-v2", "mmsp-v3": "mmsp-v3", "cpm-v1": "cpm-v1", "ifb-v1": "ifb-v1", "ifb-v2": "ifb-v2", "ifb-v3": "ifb-v3", "mppp-v1": "mppp-v1", "mppp-v2": "mppp-v2", "mppp-v3": "mppp-v3", "mup-v1": "mup-v1", "mmdl-v1": "mmdl-v1", "mmdl-v2": "mmdl-v2", "mmdl-v3": "mmdl-v3", "mmr-v1": "mmr-v1", "mjsm-v1": "mjsm-v1", "psp-v1": "psp-v1", "psp-v2": "psp-v2", "psp-v3": "psp-v3", "upg-v1": "upg-v1", "pcr-v1": "pcr-v1", "pcr-v2": "pcr-v2", "pcr-v3": "pcr-v3", "pdp-v1": "pdp-v1", "pdp-v2": "pdp-v2", "sud-v1": "sud-v1", "sud-v2": "sud-v2", "sud-v3": "sud-v3", "utl-v1": "utl-v1", "utl-v2": "utl-v2", "utl-v3": "utl-v3", "opr-v1": "opr-v1", "opr-v2": "opr-v2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 21, "registered_not_positive": 21, "cast_gt_registered": 21}, "n_stations_flagged": 21, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:21:16.627784", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.438, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.652, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.56, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.35, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.703, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.463, "year": 1976, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.652, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.56, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.485, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 1976, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.541, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.541, "year": 1976, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "386fbd7fbf794978b36cde9f52e2109f", "name": "Mauritius 1967 parliamentary (overnight mu_1967_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mauritius", "year": 1967, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "BLOCK VOTING: 3-member constituencies (Rodrigues 2): each voter casts up to 3 candidate-votes, so sum(candidates)/valid ballots = 2-3 by design. Do not reconcile candidate sums against ballots/registered. https://www.electionpassport.com/files/MU/MU.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pmsd-v1": "pmsd-v1", "pmsd-v2": "pmsd-v2", "pmsd-v3": "pmsd-v3", "ip-v1": "ip-v1", "ip-v2": "ip-v2", "ip-v3": "ip-v3", "ip-v4": "ip-v4", "ip-v5": "ip-v5", "nswp-v1": "nswp-v1", "nswp-v2": "nswp-v2", "nswp-v3": "nswp-v3", "mycl-v1": "mycl-v1", "mlf-v1": "mlf-v1", "mwp-v1": "mwp-v1", "amhc-v1": "amhc-v1", "amhc-v2": "amhc-v2", "amhc-v3": "amhc-v3", "pr-v1": "pr-v1", "ind-v1": "ind-v1", "ind-v2": "ind-v2", "ind-v3": "ind-v3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 21, "registered_not_positive": 21, "votes_gt_valid": 21}, "n_stations_flagged": 21, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:21:16.379389", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.385, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.923, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.476, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.404, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.385, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 1967, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.923, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 1967, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1967, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.776, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 1967, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1967, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.422, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 1967, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 1967, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.476, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.476, "year": 1967, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 1967, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.274, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.274, "year": 1967, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 1967, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 1967, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.303, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.303, "year": 1967, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 1967, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ee638ec0c12e4c2985cde74a1f5bd8dc", "name": "Montserrat 2009 parliamentary (overnight ms_2009_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Montserrat", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "BLOCK VOTING: 2009: all 9 seats elected at-large, each voter up to 9 votes; sum(candidates)/ballots up to ~9 by design. Do not reconcile candidate sums against ballots/registered. https://www.electionpassport.com/files/MS/MS.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"mcp1": "mcp1", "mcp2": "mcp2", "mcp3": "mcp3", "mcp4": "mcp4", "mcp5": "mcp5", "mcp6": "mcp6", "mcp7": "mcp7", "mcp8": "mcp8", "mcp9": "mcp9", "mlp1": "mlp1", "mlp2": "mlp2", "mlp3": "mlp3", "mlp4": "mlp4", "mlp5": "mlp5", "fwp": "fwp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5", "ind6": "ind6", "ind7": "ind7", "ind8": "ind8", "ind9": "ind9"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 6, "registered_not_positive": 6, "cast_gt_registered": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:21:16.226603", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b5c50a9bf6bf40ba92562f401a7ed9ac", "name": "Cayman Islands 2013 parliamentary (overnight ky_2013_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cayman Islands", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "BLOCK VOTING: multi-member districts (up to 6 seats): block voting, sum(candidates)/valid ballots = seats by design. Do not reconcile candidate sums against ballots/registered. https://www.electionpassport.com/files/KY/KY.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ppm1": "ppm1", "ppm2": "ppm2", "ppm3": "ppm3", "ppm4": "ppm4", "ppm5": "ppm5", "ppm6": "ppm6", "udp1": "udp1", "udp2": "udp2", "udp3": "udp3", "udp4": "udp4", "udp5": "udp5", "udp6": "udp6", "pna1": "pna1", "pna2": "pna2", "c4c1": "c4c1", "c4c2": "c4c2", "c4c3": "c4c3", "c4c4": "c4c4", "c4c5": "c4c5", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:21:16.060841", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a8c3d090434745b9ad4033c5624d78ea", "name": "Cayman Islands 2009 parliamentary (overnight ky_2009_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cayman Islands", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "BLOCK VOTING: multi-member districts (up to 6 seats): block voting, sum(candidates)/valid ballots = seats by design. Do not reconcile candidate sums against ballots/registered. https://www.electionpassport.com/files/KY/KY.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ppm1": "ppm1", "ppm2": "ppm2", "ppm3": "ppm3", "ppm4": "ppm4", "udp1": "udp1", "udp2": "udp2", "udp3": "udp3", "udp4": "udp4", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5", "ind6": "ind6", "ind7": "ind7"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 6, "votes_gt_valid": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:21:15.899590", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "798ee79298d14f479ae1ce1027abd586", "name": "Bermuda 1998 parliamentary (overnight bm_1998_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bermuda", "year": 1998, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "BLOCK VOTING: pre-2003 dual-member constituencies: each voter casts 2 votes, sum(candidates)/valid ballots ~= 2 by design. Do not reconcile candidate sums against ballots/registered. https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BM/BM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ubp1": "ubp1", "ubp2": "ubp2", "plp1": "plp1", "plp2": "plp2", "nlp1": "nlp1", "nlp2": "nlp2", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1, "votes_gt_valid": 20}, "n_stations_flagged": 20, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:21:15.720100", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 20}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "91c3a7235e464114853f2774f6ade361", "name": "Bermuda 1993 parliamentary (overnight bm_1993_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bermuda", "year": 1993, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "BLOCK VOTING: pre-2003 dual-member constituencies: each voter casts 2 votes, sum(candidates)/valid ballots ~= 2 by design. Do not reconcile candidate sums against ballots/registered. https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BM/BM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ubp1": "ubp1", "ubp2": "ubp2", "plp1": "plp1", "plp2": "plp2", "nlp1": "nlp1", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 20, "cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 20, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:21:15.560367", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 20}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "012c9cec56044592a2270dcf45e58290", "name": "Bermuda 1989 parliamentary (overnight bm_1989_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bermuda", "year": 1989, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "BLOCK VOTING: pre-2003 dual-member constituencies: each voter casts 2 votes, sum(candidates)/valid ballots ~= 2 by design. Do not reconcile candidate sums against ballots/registered. https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BM/BM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ubp1": "ubp1", "ubp2": "ubp2", "plp1": "plp1", "plp2": "plp2", "nlp1": "nlp1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 20}, "n_stations_flagged": 20, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:21:15.417268", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 20}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "50d872e1ee08448eace24d02054fe2c0", "name": "Bermuda 1985 parliamentary (overnight bm_1985_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bermuda", "year": 1985, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "BLOCK VOTING: pre-2003 dual-member constituencies: each voter casts 2 votes, sum(candidates)/valid ballots ~= 2 by design. Do not reconcile candidate sums against ballots/registered. https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BM/BM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ubp1": "ubp1", "ubp2": "ubp2", "plp1": "plp1", "plp2": "plp2", "nlp1": "nlp1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 19}, "n_stations_flagged": 19, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:21:15.257165", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 20}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0e3ad3cad0f84928b6303cf77285f110", "name": "Bermuda 1983 parliamentary (overnight bm_1983_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bermuda", "year": 1983, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "BLOCK VOTING: pre-2003 dual-member constituencies: each voter casts 2 votes, sum(candidates)/valid ballots ~= 2 by design. Do not reconcile candidate sums against ballots/registered. https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BM/BM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ubp1": "ubp1", "ubp2": "ubp2", "plp1": "plp1", "plp2": "plp2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 20}, "n_stations_flagged": 20, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:21:15.106530", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 20}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b5e0d6837c2442d2b524d36773a28750", "name": "Bermuda 1980 parliamentary (overnight bm_1980_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bermuda", "year": 1980, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "BLOCK VOTING: pre-2003 dual-member constituencies: each voter casts 2 votes, sum(candidates)/valid ballots ~= 2 by design. Do not reconcile candidate sums against ballots/registered. https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BM/BM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ubp1": "ubp1", "ubp2": "ubp2", "plp1": "plp1", "plp2": "plp2", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 20}, "n_stations_flagged": 20, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:21:14.942417", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 20}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "eae4135c8cc74520a15bf94d558c01dc", "name": "Bermuda 1972 parliamentary (overnight bm_1972_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bermuda", "year": 1972, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "BLOCK VOTING: pre-2003 dual-member constituencies: each voter casts 2 votes, sum(candidates)/valid ballots ~= 2 by design. Do not reconcile candidate sums against ballots/registered. https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BM/BM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ubp1": "ubp1", "ubp2": "ubp2", "plp1": "plp1", "plp2": "plp2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 20}, "n_stations_flagged": 20, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:21:13.770041", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 20}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2492d2a3482744229d048718577c9ff7", "name": "Mexico 1988 presidential (overnight mexico_1988_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 1988, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Cantu (2019) Fingerprints of Fraud replication, Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/NNNPOU (CC0) - the se cayo el sistema election, digitized from original tally sheets. CAUTION: source valid column is NOT the party sum (1988 coalition-component reporting; ~8.8k casillas missing accounting) - valid mapped as sum of the 8 party columns; published cast/invalid kept.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "state", "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pan": "pan", "pri": "pri", "pps": "pps", "psm": "psm", "pms": "pms", "pfcrn": "pfcrn", "prt": "prt", "parm": "parm"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 53261, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 44995, "invalid_gt_cast": 1509, "registered_not_positive": 53261, "cast_valid_mismatch": 24424}, "n_stations_flagged": 53261, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:32.151047", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.211, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.629, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.345, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.159, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.211, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 1988, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.629, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.407, "year": 1988, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.589, "year": 1988, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.072, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.268, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.18, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.121, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 1988, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.23, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.345, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.345, "year": 1988, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.159, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.159, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.167, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.167, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.582, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 1988, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.325, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.325, "year": 1988, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.56, "year": 1988, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "PRI", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "NDF", "margin": 19.96, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MEX", "year": 1988, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 53261}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9d72c134347643aaa8199e47b82430fd", "name": "Samoa 2011 parliamentary (overnight ws_2011_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Samoa", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/WS/WS.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"hrpp1": "hrpp1", "hrpp2": "hrpp2", "hrpp3": "hrpp3", "hrpp4": "hrpp4", "hrpp5": "hrpp5", "ts1": "ts1", "ts2": "ts2", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5", "ind6": "ind6", "ind7": "ind7"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 42, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 40, "registered_not_positive": 42}, "n_stations_flagged": 42, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:27.879142", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 42}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fa93f404eda645dfb4749e10e3ffc605", "name": "Samoa 2006 parliamentary (overnight ws_2006_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Samoa", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/WS/WS.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"hrpp1": "hrpp1", "hrpp2": "hrpp2", "hrpp3": "hrpp3", "hrpp4": "hrpp4", "hrpp5": "hrpp5", "sdup1": "sdup1", "sdup2": "sdup2", "sdup3": "sdup3", "sp1": "sp1", "sp2": "sp2", "sppp": "sppp", "tcp": "tcp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 42, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 35, "registered_not_positive": 42, "cast_gt_registered": 41}, "n_stations_flagged": 42, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:27.662981", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 42}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c54b95925d304590a3a9e77077358ea6", "name": "Vanuatu 2012 parliamentary (overnight vu_2012_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Vanuatu", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/VU/VU.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ffvp": "ffvp", "fmp1": "fmp1", "fmp2": "fmp2", "gc": "gc", "gjp1": "gjp1", "gjp2": "gjp2", "iauko": "iauko", "imov": "imov", "kdp": "kdp", "mbc": "mbc", "mpp1": "mpp1", "mpp2": "mpp2", "mpp3": "mpp3", "mt": "mt", "nagr1": "nagr1", "nagr2": "nagr2", "nagr3": "nagr3", "nagr4": "nagr4", "nata": "nata", "nca": "nca", "nup1": "nup1", "nup2": "nup2", "nup3": "nup3", "pap": "pap", "ppp1": "ppp1", "ppp2": "ppp2", "ppp3": "ppp3", "ppp4": "ppp4", "psp1": "psp1", "psp2": "psp2", "rmc1": "rmc1", "rmc2": "rmc2", "rmc3": "rmc3", "tuf": "tuf", "ues": "ues", "ulf": "ulf", "ump1": "ump1", "ump2": "ump2", "ump3": "ump3", "ump4": "ump4", "van": "van", "vdlpc1": "vdlpc1", "vdlpc2": "vdlpc2", "vdp1": "vdp1", "vdp2": "vdp2", "vfp": "vfp", "vic1": "vic1", "vic2": "vic2", "vldp": "vldp", "vlib": "vlib", "vlp": "vlp", "vnp": "vnp", "vp1": "vp1", "vp2": "vp2", "vp3": "vp3", "vp4": "vp4", "vp5": "vp5", "vpdp": "vpdp", "vpp1": "vpp1", "vpp2": "vpp2", "vpp3": "vpp3", "vpp4": "vpp4", "vprp": "vprp", "vrdp1": "vrdp1", "vrdp2": "vrdp2", "vrp1": "vrp1", "vrp2": "vrp2", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5", "ind6": "ind6", "ind7": "ind7", "ind8": "ind8", "ind9": "ind9", "ind10": "ind10", "ind11": "ind11", "ind12": "ind12", "ind13": "ind13", "ind14": "ind14", "ind15": "ind15", "ind16": "ind16"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:27.494806", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.557, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.356, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.738, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.62, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.356, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.544, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.636, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.198, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.428, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.62, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.62, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.888, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.441, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.441, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "43c3233ac96a4d5ebbc23da04941fc9b", "name": "British Virgin Islands 2015 parliamentary (overnight vg_2015_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "British Virgin Islands", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/VG/VG.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"vip1": "vip1", "vip2": "vip2", "vip3": "vip3", "vip4": "vip4", "ndp1": "ndp1", "ndp2": "ndp2", "ndp3": "ndp3", "ndp4": "ndp4", "pep1": "pep1", "pep2": "pep2", "pep3": "pep3", "ppc1": "ppc1", "ppc2": "ppc2", "ppc3": "ppc3", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 9, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 9, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:27.206955", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b0c27736715640dba9539ba2cf8772cd", "name": "British Virgin Islands 2011 parliamentary (overnight vg_2011_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "British Virgin Islands", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/VG/VG.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"vip1": "vip1", "vip2": "vip2", "vip3": "vip3", "vip4": "vip4", "ndp1": "ndp1", "ndp2": "ndp2", "ndp3": "ndp3", "ndp4": "ndp4", "ppa1": "ppa1", "ppa2": "ppa2", "ppa3": "ppa3", "ppa4": "ppa4", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 10, "registered_not_positive": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:27.036543", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e921f57777954b6692d647c66a5b88c6", "name": "British Virgin Islands 2007 parliamentary (overnight vg_2007_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "British Virgin Islands", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/VG/VG.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"vip1": "vip1", "vip2": "vip2", "vip3": "vip3", "vip4": "vip4", "ndp1": "ndp1", "ndp2": "ndp2", "ndp3": "ndp3", "ndp4": "ndp4", "ipm": "ipm", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:26.901706", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6be6865dff12463faac393ff3fb83b30", "name": "British Virgin Islands 2003 parliamentary (overnight vg_2003_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "British Virgin Islands", "year": 2003, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/VG/VG.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"vip1": "vip1", "vip2": "vip2", "vip3": "vip3", "vip4": "vip4", "ndp1": "ndp1", "ndp2": "ndp2", "ndp3": "ndp3", "ndp4": "ndp4", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:26.765269", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cf96fe66aa4d40b2a6681d1660195998", "name": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 2015 parliamentary (overnight vc_2015_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/VC/VC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ndp": "ndp", "ulp": "ulp", "svg": "svg", "drp": "drp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:26.620085", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 15}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b238f54b4bce4d8f8fbafb797bab2b9d", "name": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 2010 parliamentary (overnight vc_2010_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/VC/VC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ndp": "ndp", "ulp": "ulp", "svg": "svg"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:26.484775", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 15}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6ab42b81eadb4407b1b953ccf12de0a7", "name": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 2005 parliamentary (overnight vc_2005_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/VC/VC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ndp": "ndp", "ulp": "ulp", "svg": "svg"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:26.355885", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 15}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b8c638cdd15c4963bdcd32417ffdb7aa", "name": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 2001 parliamentary (overnight vc_2001_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines", "year": 2001, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/VC/VC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ndp": "ndp", "ulp": "ulp", "pwp": "pwp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:26.223629", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 15}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9a56d7a7465444a3aaff0eff62925130", "name": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1998 parliamentary (overnight vc_1998_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines", "year": 1998, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/VC/VC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ndp": "ndp", "ulp": "ulp", "pwp": "pwp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:26.089021", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 15}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "89aa65a9c56e4ba7be4a0bdcf5f339c7", "name": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1994 parliamentary (overnight vc_1994_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines", "year": 1994, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/VC/VC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ndp": "ndp", "svlp": "svlp", "mnu": "mnu", "oth": "oth"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:25.939787", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 15}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e1f48385c5254ac5bd398070214f4750", "name": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1989 parliamentary (overnight vc_1989_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines", "year": 1989, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/VC/VC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ndp": "ndp", "svlp": "svlp", "upm": "upm", "mnu": "mnu"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:25.803750", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 15}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "eb007d73fbe94891a8f6dd1d20ab8eb5", "name": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1984 parliamentary (overnight vc_1984_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines", "year": 1984, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/VC/VC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ndp": "ndp", "svlp": "svlp", "upm": "upm", "mnu": "mnu", "pdp": "pdp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:25.668682", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 13}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c2a9cf06d0d149a98ade81738fabd8a8", "name": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1979 parliamentary (overnight vc_1979_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines", "year": 1979, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/VC/VC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ndp": "ndp", "ppp": "ppp", "svlp": "svlp", "upm": "upm", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:25.515997", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 13}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ef78cb04741f4834b18235d18c78b96c", "name": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1974 parliamentary (overnight vc_1974_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines", "year": 1974, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/VC/VC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"dfm": "dfm", "junta": "junta", "ppp": "ppp", "svlp": "svlp", "winp": "winp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 13, "cast_gt_registered": 13}, "n_stations_flagged": 13, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:25.376073", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 13}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d28f8bf202e54183ae21662e576bf275", "name": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1972 parliamentary (overnight vc_1972_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines", "year": 1972, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/VC/VC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ppp": "ppp", "svlp": "svlp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 13, "cast_gt_registered": 13}, "n_stations_flagged": 13, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:25.250686", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 13}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6ed459ae61e9424dba3e12555486e248", "name": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1967 parliamentary (overnight vc_1967_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines", "year": 1967, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/VC/VC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ppp": "ppp", "svlp": "svlp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 9, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 9, "registered_not_positive": 9}, "n_stations_flagged": 9, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:25.130955", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 9}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "00d333d5bb2e4f0e94a004e3a597fbdd", "name": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1966 parliamentary (overnight vc_1966_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines", "year": 1966, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/VC/VC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ppp": "ppp", "svlp": "svlp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 9, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 9, "cast_gt_registered": 9}, "n_stations_flagged": 9, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:25.015450", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 9}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ad3c29017069483184bb0300597a3561", "name": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1961 parliamentary (overnight vc_1961_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines", "year": 1961, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/VC/VC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ppp": "ppp", "svlp": "svlp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 9, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 9, "registered_not_positive": 9}, "n_stations_flagged": 9, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:24.890058", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 9}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c16b115515a446d39de0d72e59d5733c", "name": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1957 parliamentary (overnight vc_1957_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines", "year": 1957, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/VC/VC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"plm": "plm", "ppp": "ppp", "svlp": "svlp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 8, "registered_not_positive": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:24.764988", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d77735e573094d878c8f5cc7192b485b", "name": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1954 parliamentary (overnight vc_1954_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines", "year": 1954, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/VC/VC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ppp": "ppp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 8, "cast_gt_registered": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:24.642365", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8db2464ee33f428a9e209afea89328da", "name": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1951 parliamentary (overnight vc_1951_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines", "year": 1951, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/VC/VC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"wa": "wa", "wu": "wu", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 8, "registered_not_positive": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:24.508352", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d8e7b80db3ec49b0a8d63bb1efed9eaa", "name": "Trinidad and Tobago 2015 parliamentary (overnight tt_2015_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Trinidad and Tobago", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/TT/TT.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cop": "cop", "ddp": "ddp", "idp": "idp", "ilp": "ilp", "love": "love", "nct": "nct", "njac": "njac", "nnv": "nnv", "pnm": "pnm", "tf": "tf", "thc": "thc", "tnv": "tnv", "top": "top", "tpt": "tpt", "unc": "unc", "yep": "yep", "your": "your", "ind": "ind"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 41, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:24.295648", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.865, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.2, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.791, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.676, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.2, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.444, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.628, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.226, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.556, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.791, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.676, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.654, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.911, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.137, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.137, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 41}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8df773fa1cb041c7827417f063a01ec6", "name": "Trinidad and Tobago 2010 parliamentary (overnight tt_2010_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Trinidad and Tobago", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/TT/TT.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cop": "cop", "nnv": "nnv", "pnm": "pnm", "top": "top", "ttncp": "ttncp", "unc": "unc", "ind": "ind"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 41, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:24.059393", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.629, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.898, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.802, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.686, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.629, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.898, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.264, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.333, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.509, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.192, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.683, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.683, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.137, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.137, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.887, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 41}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e31fd13732da41e98875fa787321574b", "name": "Trinidad and Tobago 2007 parliamentary (overnight tt_2007_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Trinidad and Tobago", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/TT/TT.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cop": "cop", "dac": "dac", "dna": "dna", "pnm": "pnm", "unc": "unc", "ind": "ind"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 41, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:23.843705", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.778, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.921, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.781, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.666, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.79, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.333, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.509, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.191, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.666, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.658, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.13, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.13, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 41}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2c6b7c9bea3e48789f540b8d964fce84", "name": "Trinidad and Tobago 2002 parliamentary (overnight tt_2002_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Trinidad and Tobago", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/TT/TT.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ca": "ca", "dptt": "dptt", "mup": "mup", "nar": "nar", "njac": "njac", "nlp": "nlp", "ntm": "ntm", "pep": "pep", "pnm": "pnm", "tms": "tms", "tpv": "tpv", "unc": "unc", "ind": "ind"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 36, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:23.642526", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.096, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.838, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.766, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.643, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.096, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.788, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.697, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.333, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.509, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.131, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.533, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.643, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.643, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.638, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.13, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.13, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 36}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "455920afca6c4ed59e24cd4ab623e2a0", "name": "Trinidad and Tobago 2001 parliamentary (overnight tt_2001_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Trinidad and Tobago", "year": 2001, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/TT/TT.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"nar": "nar", "ndo": "ndo", "pnm": "pnm", "tu": "tu", "unc": "unc"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 36, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:23.407440", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.787, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.838, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.754, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.633, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.697, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.658, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.664, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.333, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.509, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.131, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.533, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.754, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.633, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.628, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.148, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.148, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 36}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d6798353aa9f46f7927ebdc6cb29d107", "name": "Trinidad and Tobago 2000 parliamentary (overnight tt_2000_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Trinidad and Tobago", "year": 2000, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/TT/TT.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"mup": "mup", "nar": "nar", "njac": "njac", "nlp": "nlp", "ntm": "ntm", "pep": "pep", "pnm": "pnm", "tms": "tms", "tpv": "tpv", "unc": "unc", "ind": "ind"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 36, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:23.192519", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.389, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.838, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.782, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.66, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.389, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.424, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.333, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.509, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.131, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.533, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.66, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.651, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.148, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.148, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 36}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3975e03f0c534c69b21993a6ec061fe4", "name": "Trinidad and Tobago 1995 parliamentary (overnight tt_1995_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Trinidad and Tobago", "year": 1995, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/TT/TT.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"mup": "mup", "nar": "nar", "njac": "njac", "nlp": "nlp", "ntm": "ntm", "pnm": "pnm", "tpv": "tpv", "unc": "unc", "ind": "ind"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 36, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:22.978537", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.637, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.84, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.772, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.646, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.637, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.84, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.701, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.767, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.333, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.509, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.132, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.533, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.638, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.894, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.148, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.148, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 36}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d030a06d49574063978bdecbfc6f059e", "name": "Trinidad and Tobago 1991 parliamentary (overnight tt_1991_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Trinidad and Tobago", "year": 1991, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/TT/TT.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"nar": "nar", "njac": "njac", "pnm": "pnm", "unc": "unc", "ind": "ind"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 36, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:22.772205", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.485, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.838, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.762, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.635, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.485, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.026, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.333, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.346, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.129, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.532, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.635, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.627, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.627, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.143, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.143, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 36}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "07e5957cfbc24eab8613fca162d750e1", "name": "Tonga 2014 parliamentary (overnight to_2014_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Tonga", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/TO/TO.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5", "ind6": "ind6", "ind7": "ind7", "ind8": "ind8", "ind9": "ind9", "ind10": "ind10", "ind11": "ind11", "ind12": "ind12"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 17, "cast_gt_registered": 17}, "n_stations_flagged": 17, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:22.619036", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "387d92ea63c546b5a841cc2ee2433845", "name": "Timor-Leste 2012 parliamentary (overnight tl_2012_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Timor-Leste", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/TL/TL.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"udt": "udt", "pr": "pr", "pdn": "pdn", "ad1": "ad1", "pun": "pun", "pd": "pd", "ptd": "ptd", "psd": "psd", "frntl": "frntl", "pkhunto": "pkhunto", "cnrt": "cnrt", "fretilin": "fretilin", "pdp": "pdp", "pmd-par": "pmd-par", "asdt": "asdt", "psd-1": "psd-1", "pst": "pst", "pdc": "pdc", "pdl": "pdl", "ampt": "ampt", "undertim": "undertim", "plpa-pdrt": "plpa-pdrt"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:22.446496", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.226, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.565, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.65, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.495, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.226, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.565, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.705, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.612, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.647, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.662, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.15, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.539, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.385, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.65, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.495, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.495, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "Taur Matan Ruak", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "FRETILIN", "margin": 22.46, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "TLS", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 13}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "84d3f05457f84dca87f2ed05b6fe164f", "name": "Togo 2007 parliamentary (overnight tg_2007_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Togo", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/TG/TG.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"addi": "addi", "adp": "adp", "atd": "atd", "car": "car", "cdpa": "cdpa", "cfn": "cfn", "cpda": "cpda", "cpp": "cpp", "fadd": "fadd", "jd": "jd", "juv": "juv", "mcd": "mcd", "mocep": "mocep", "mrc": "mrc", "ndp": "ndp", "nid": "nid", "pact": "pact", "pdp": "pdp", "pdr": "pdr", "pnts": "pnts", "prr": "prr", "psr": "psr", "purd": "purd", "rfvjc": "rfvjc", "rpt": "rpt", "udps": "udps", "uds": "uds", "ufc": "ufc", "upr": "upr", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5", "ind6": "ind6", "ind7": "ind7"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 31, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:22.261023", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.557, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.496, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.355, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.194, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.496, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.61, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.085, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.271, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.218, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.304, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.059, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.265, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.103, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.355, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.355, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.194, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.194, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.281, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.654, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.233, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.233, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 31}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6241f9267579496d8eca78fcffd7e9ce", "name": "Turks and Caicos Islands 2016 parliamentary (overnight tc_2016_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Turks and Caicos Islands", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/TC/TC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pnp1": "pnp1", "pnp2": "pnp2", "pnp3": "pnp3", "pnp4": "pnp4", "pnp5": "pnp5", "pdm1": "pdm1", "pdm2": "pdm2", "pdm3": "pdm3", "pdm4": "pdm4", "pdm5": "pdm5", "pda1": "pda1", "pda2": "pda2", "pda3": "pda3", "pda4": "pda4", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5", "ind6": "ind6", "ind7": "ind7"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:22.054962", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 11}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dba6bab32d384a798b37911b0a5ade65", "name": "Turks and Caicos Islands 2012 parliamentary (overnight tc_2012_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Turks and Caicos Islands", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/TC/TC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pnp1": "pnp1", "pnp2": "pnp2", "pnp3": "pnp3", "pnp4": "pnp4", "pnp5": "pnp5", "pdm1": "pdm1", "pdm2": "pdm2", "pdm3": "pdm3", "pdm4": "pdm4", "pdm5": "pdm5", "ppp": "ppp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 11, "registered_not_positive": 11}, "n_stations_flagged": 11, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:17:21.865890", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 11}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e31203208b814b0bbc4b936bd968c783", "name": "Turks and Caicos Islands 2007 parliamentary (overnight tc_2007_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Turks and Caicos Islands", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/TC/TC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pnp1": "pnp1", "pdm1": "pdm1", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 15, "cast_gt_registered": 15}, "n_stations_flagged": 15, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:05:09.464423", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 15}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e63a432dd5c445eeb7526df0bfa360fa", "name": "Eswatini 2013 parliamentary (overnight sz_2013_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Eswatini", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/SZ/SZ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5", "ind6": "ind6", "ind7": "ind7", "ind8": "ind8", "ind9": "ind9", "ind10": "ind10", "ind11": "ind11", "ind12": "ind12"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 107, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 107, "cast_gt_registered": 102}, "n_stations_flagged": 107, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:05:09.072456", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.166, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.331, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.13, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.097, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.166, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.291, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.331, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.583, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.805, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.451, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.168, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.542, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.214, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.797, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.139, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.13, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.13, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.097, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.097, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.092, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.092, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.31, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.31, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.314, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.314, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.493, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.493, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.199, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.199, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 107}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "36a1f784164e41c583b5815d372f05b8", "name": "Suriname 2015 parliamentary (overnight sr_2015_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Suriname", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/SR/SR.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"doe": "doe", "ac": "ac", "ndp": "ndp", "palu": "palu", "aps": "aps", "anc": "anc", "drs": "drs", "mf": "mf", "nop": "nop", "ping": "ping", "v7": "v7"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 10, "cast_gt_registered": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:05:08.923408", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.611, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.851, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.757, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.633, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.611, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.443, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.116, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.293, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.072, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.518, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.633, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.56, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.877, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.229, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.229, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5bc4c8c65b63457dad77c48f0dfe77c4", "name": "Suriname 2010 parliamentary (overnight sr_2010_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Suriname", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/SR/SR.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"megac": "megac", "nf2": "nf2", "volksall": "volksall", "doe": "doe", "bvd-pvf": "bvd-pvf", "ac": "ac", "dus": "dus", "pvrs": "pvrs", "nu": "nu"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:05:08.780991", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.437, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.864, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.752, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.632, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.437, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.572, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.462, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.116, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.293, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.18, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.632, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.557, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.209, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.209, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": null, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "SUR", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "44469b53d6a044f6a877d2a0d7fb0b7d", "name": "Suriname 2005 parliamentary (overnight sr_2005_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Suriname", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/SR/SR.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"nf1": "nf1", "ups-doe": "ups-doe", "ac": "ac", "ndp": "ndp", "nu": "nu", "vvv": "vvv", "a1": "a1", "palu": "palu", "ns": "ns", "ppp": "ppp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:05:08.645166", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.5, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.856, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.767, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.654, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.5, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.472, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.116, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.293, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.181, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.654, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.872, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.199, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.199, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.888, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "55c8bd1b2c56449c8ba0f840b4e44d8f", "name": "Suriname 2000 parliamentary (overnight sr_2000_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Suriname", "year": 2000, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/SR/SR.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"millc": "millc", "nf1": "nf1", "doe": "doe", "pvf": "pvf", "bvd": "bvd", "palu": "palu", "dnp2000": "dnp2000", "da91": "da91", "hpp": "hpp", "nk": "nk", "abop": "abop", "nhp": "nhp", "d21": "d21", "nplo": "nplo", "plima": "plima", "aps": "aps", "psv": "psv"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:05:08.483681", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.642, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.911, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.78, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.665, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.911, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.116, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.471, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.566, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.78, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.575, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.575, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.872, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.199, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.199, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.894, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c80cf6a5e081438784d25b0e209183ae", "name": "Seychelles 2016 parliamentary (overnight sc_2016_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Seychelles", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/SC/SC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ind": "ind", "pl": "pl", "spm": "spm", "lds": "lds"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 25, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:05:08.287478", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.329, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.059, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.585, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.491, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.329, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.059, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.124, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.474, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.987, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.747, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.384, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.562, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.391, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.585, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.585, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.491, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.491, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.206, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.206, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.651, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 25}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "64e4865ee3a74fb3bda578499d523bdf", "name": "Seychelles 2011 parliamentary (overnight sc_2011_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Seychelles", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/SC/SC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ind": "ind", "pdm": "pdm", "pl": "pl"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 25, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:05:08.114592", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.735, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.479, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.377, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.684, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.114, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.528, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.036, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.17, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.377, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.377, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.393, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.393, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.747, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.747, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.78, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.256, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.256, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.587, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "PL", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "SNP", "margin": 14.24, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SYC", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 25}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "567fe771828e4af392c850b4078304ee", "name": "Solomon Islands 2014 parliamentary (overnight sb_2014_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Solomon Islands", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/SB/SB.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"vote1": "vote1", "vote2": "vote2", "vote3": "vote3", "vote4": "vote4", "vote5": "vote5", "vote6": "vote6", "vote7": "vote7", "vote8": "vote8", "vote9": "vote9", "vote10": "vote10", "vote11": "vote11", "vote12": "vote12", "vote13": "vote13", "vote14": "vote14", "vote15": "vote15", "vote16": "vote16", "vote17": "vote17", "ddp": "ddp", "nnp": "nnp", "pap-v1": "pap-v1", "pra-v1": "pra-v1", "dap": "dap", "kad": "kad", "ntp": "ntp", "pmc": "pmc", "ppp": "ppp", "pfir": "pfir", "udp": "udp", "yoru": "yoru"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 50, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 50, "registered_not_positive": 50}, "n_stations_flagged": 50, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:05:07.876673", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.209, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.612, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.585, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.45, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.209, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.612, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.622, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.42, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.543, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.386, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.585, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.585, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.45, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.45, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.338, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.338, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.609, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 50}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "41bd95b421094d0383306df5da7a257d", "name": "Solomon Islands 2010 parliamentary (overnight sb_2010_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Solomon Islands", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/SB/SB.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"vote1": "vote1", "vote2": "vote2", "vote3": "vote3", "vote4": "vote4", "vote5": "vote5", "vote6": "vote6", "vote7": "vote7", "vote8": "vote8", "vote9": "vote9", "vote10": "vote10", "vote11": "vote11", "vote12": "vote12", "vote13": "vote13", "vote14": "vote14", "vote15": "vote15", "vote16": "vote16", "vote17": "vote17", "vote18": "vote18", "vote19": "vote19", "vote20": "vote20", "vote21": "vote21", "ddp": "ddp", "idp": "idp", "lib": "lib", "np-v1": "np-v1", "np-v2": "np-v2", "nnp": "nnp", "nnsi": "nnsi", "our-v1": "our-v1", "our-v2": "our-v2", "pap-v1": "pap-v1", "pap-v2": "pap-v2", "pcp": "pcp", "pfp": "pfp", "rdp": "rdp", "rup": "rup", "dev": "dev", "sdp": "sdp", "snp": "snp", "pra-v1": "pra-v1", "pra-v2": "pra-v2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 50, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 50, "cast_gt_registered": 50}, "n_stations_flagged": 50, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:05:07.593512", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.071, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.612, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.573, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.44, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.612, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.691, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.64, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.42, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.547, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.44, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.332, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.332, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.788, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.594, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.594, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 50}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "512487a3017646aa849d265e7c72b912", "name": "Solomon Islands 2006 parliamentary (overnight sb_2006_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Solomon Islands", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/SB/SB.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"vote1": "vote1", "vote2": "vote2", "vote3": "vote3", "vote4": "vote4", "vote5": "vote5", "vote6": "vote6", "vote7": "vote7", "vote8": "vote8", "vote9": "vote9", "vote10": "vote10", "vote11": "vote11", "vote12": "vote12", "vote13": "vote13", "vote14": "vote14", "vote15": "vote15", "vote16": "vote16", "vote17": "vote17", "vote18": "vote18", "vote19": "vote19", "vote20": "vote20", "vote21": "vote21"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 50, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 2, "registered_not_positive": 50, "cast_gt_registered": 49}, "n_stations_flagged": 50, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:05:07.290949", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.987, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.295, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.471, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.361, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.987, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.747, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.295, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.595, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.6, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.42, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.416, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.354, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.471, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.471, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.361, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.361, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.285, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.285, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.797, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 50}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "beb070d646694ea1801a290c060c951c", "name": "Solomon Islands 2001 parliamentary (overnight sb_2001_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Solomon Islands", "year": 2001, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/SB/SB.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"vote1": "vote1", "vote2": "vote2", "vote3": "vote3", "vote4": "vote4", "vote5": "vote5", "vote6": "vote6", "vote7": "vote7", "vote8": "vote8", "vote9": "vote9", "vote10": "vote10", "vote11": "vote11", "vote12": "vote12", "vote13": "vote13", "vote14": "vote14"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 50, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 50, "cast_valid_mismatch": 4, "registered_not_positive": 50}, "n_stations_flagged": 50, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:05:07.022972", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.375, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.053, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.273, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.184, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.375, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.594, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.053, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.477, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.235, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.42, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.725, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.181, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.184, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.643, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.643, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.521, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.755, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 50}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2834f4eae3554730a07e4359ee943b04", "name": "Solomon Islands 1997 parliamentary (overnight sb_1997_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Solomon Islands", "year": 1997, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/SB/SB.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"vote1": "vote1", "vote2": "vote2", "vote3": "vote3", "vote4": "vote4", "vote5": "vote5", "vote6": "vote6", "vote7": "vote7", "vote8": "vote8", "vote9": "vote9", "vote10": "vote10", "vote11": "vote11", "vote12": "vote12", "vote13": "vote13", "vote14": "vote14", "vote15": "vote15", "vote16": "vote16", "vote17": "vote17", "vote18": "vote18"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 50, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 10, "registered_not_positive": 50, "cast_gt_registered": 50}, "n_stations_flagged": 50, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:05:06.763559", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.383, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.039, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.526, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.409, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.383, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.596, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.039, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.474, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.122, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.42, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.182, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.526, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.526, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.409, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.409, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.313, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.313, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.788, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 50}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "51306d70d76b426b8ae428de24c5cabb", "name": "Solomon Islands 1993 parliamentary (overnight sb_1993_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Solomon Islands", "year": 1993, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/SB/SB.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"vote1": "vote1", "vote2": "vote2", "vote3": "vote3", "vote4": "vote4", "vote5": "vote5", "vote6": "vote6", "vote7": "vote7", "vote8": "vote8", "vote9": "vote9", "vote10": "vote10", "vote11": "vote11", "vote12": "vote12", "vote13": "vote13", "vote14": "vote14", "vote15": "vote15"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 47, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 4, "registered_not_positive": 47, "cast_gt_registered": 45}, "n_stations_flagged": 47, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:05:06.517117", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.382, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.037, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.532, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.413, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.382, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.596, "year": 1993, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.037, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.472, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.125, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 1993, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.42, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 1993, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.177, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.532, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.532, "year": 1993, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.413, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 1993, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.318, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 1993, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 1993, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.788, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 47}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "19e8988472e0424a92fa17080f0cc3f9", "name": "Solomon Islands 1989 parliamentary (overnight sb_1989_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Solomon Islands", "year": 1989, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/SB/SB.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"vote1": "vote1", "vote2": "vote2", "vote3": "vote3", "vote4": "vote4", "vote5": "vote5", "vote6": "vote6", "vote7": "vote7", "vote8": "vote8", "vote9": "vote9", "vote10": "vote10", "vote11": "vote11", "vote12": "vote12", "vote13": "vote13", "vote14": "vote14", "vote15": "vote15", "vote16": "vote16"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 38, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 36, "registered_not_positive": 38}, "n_stations_flagged": 38, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:05:06.309382", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.385, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.05, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.531, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.415, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.385, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.596, "year": 1989, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.05, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1989, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.467, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.122, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 1989, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.42, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 1989, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.718, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.179, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.531, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.531, "year": 1989, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.415, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 1989, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 1989, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 1989, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 1989, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.355, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.355, "year": 1989, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 1989, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 38}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3813585a3c2e45118529ef44713c2a1b", "name": "Solomon Islands 1984 parliamentary (overnight sb_1984_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Solomon Islands", "year": 1984, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/SB/SB.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"vote1": "vote1", "vote2": "vote2", "vote3": "vote3", "vote4": "vote4", "vote5": "vote5", "vote6": "vote6", "vote7": "vote7", "vote8": "vote8", "vote9": "vote9", "vote10": "vote10", "vote11": "vote11", "vote12": "vote12", "vote13": "vote13", "vote14": "vote14", "vote15": "vote15", "vote16": "vote16", "vote17": "vote17", "vote18": "vote18"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 38, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 4, "registered_not_positive": 38, "cast_gt_registered": 37}, "n_stations_flagged": 38, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:05:06.090401", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.717, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.058, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.537, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.421, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.679, "year": 1984, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.058, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 1984, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.483, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.275, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.319, "year": 1984, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 1984, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.42, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 1984, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.183, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.537, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 1984, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.421, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 1984, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.308, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.308, "year": 1984, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 1984, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 1984, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.356, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.356, "year": 1984, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 1984, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 38}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4f8b2bb193a945fdb011a347e713e4c8", "name": "Solomon Islands 1980 parliamentary (overnight sb_1980_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Solomon Islands", "year": 1980, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/SB/SB.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"vote1": "vote1", "vote2": "vote2", "vote3": "vote3", "vote4": "vote4", "vote5": "vote5", "vote6": "vote6", "vote7": "vote7", "vote8": "vote8", "vote9": "vote9", "vote10": "vote10", "vote11": "vote11", "vote12": "vote12"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 38, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 38, "cast_valid_mismatch": 4, "registered_not_positive": 38}, "n_stations_flagged": 38, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:05:05.859167", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.732, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.549, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.52, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.412, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.732, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.683, "year": 1980, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.549, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.48, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.251, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.313, "year": 1980, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 1980, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.42, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 1980, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.719, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.18, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.52, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.52, "year": 1980, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.412, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 1980, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.321, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.321, "year": 1980, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.281, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.731, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.731, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 38}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bded338fa9014d4fa262be7874357e65", "name": "Solomon Islands 1976 parliamentary (overnight sb_1976_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Solomon Islands", "year": 1976, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/SB/SB.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"vote1": "vote1", "vote2": "vote2", "vote3": "vote3", "vote4": "vote4", "vote5": "vote5", "vote6": "vote6", "vote7": "vote7", "vote8": "vote8", "vote9": "vote9", "vote10": "vote10", "vote11": "vote11", "vote12": "vote12", "vote13": "vote13"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 38, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 2, "registered_not_positive": 38, "cast_gt_registered": 37}, "n_stations_flagged": 38, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:05:05.639181", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.736, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.538, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.324, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.258, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.684, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.459, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.417, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.354, "year": 1976, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.131, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.533, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.42, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.181, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.324, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.324, "year": 1976, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.258, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.258, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.124, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.124, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 38}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c19300bfc3374c6d8e1f617375ba1bca", "name": "Solomon Islands 1973 parliamentary (overnight sb_1973_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Solomon Islands", "year": 1973, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/SB/SB.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"vote1": "vote1", "vote2": "vote2", "vote3": "vote3", "vote4": "vote4", "vote5": "vote5", "vote6": "vote6", "vote7": "vote7", "vote8": "vote8", "vote9": "vote9", "vote10": "vote10"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 24, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 2, "registered_not_positive": 24, "cast_gt_registered": 24}, "n_stations_flagged": 24, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:05:05.460009", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.711, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.558, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.261, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.23, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.678, "year": 1973, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.558, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.471, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.409, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.352, "year": 1973, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 1973, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.77, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.693, "year": 1973, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.72, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.18, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.261, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.261, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.23, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.23, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.164, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.164, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 1973, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 1973, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.124, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.124, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 1973, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 24}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c4e302c4ffa646b091451374edbcb714", "name": "Rwanda 2013 parliamentary (overnight rw_2013_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Rwanda", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/RW/RW.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"fpr13": "fpr13", "psd": "psd", "pl": "pl", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6, "granularity": "province", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1, "votes_gt_valid": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:05:05.318130", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.559, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.727, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.221, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.136, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.559, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.39, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.727, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.74, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.435, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.203, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.172, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.08, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.99, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.247, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.221, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.221, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.136, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.223, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.223, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.388, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.251, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.251, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.418, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.418, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.231, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.231, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1673dc593fad47b992d45593a8f62a5a", "name": "Rwanda 2008 parliamentary (overnight rw_2008_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Rwanda", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/RW/RW.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"fpr08": "fpr08", "psd": "psd", "pl": "pl", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5, "granularity": "province", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:05:04.132738", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.684, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.22, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.203, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.125, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.22, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.649, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.214, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.166, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.369, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.092, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.203, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.203, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.125, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.125, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.199, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.199, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.372, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.237, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.237, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.553, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.218, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.218, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 5}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4575d9356a4145b8b6035ecf83f91d15", "name": "Puerto Rico 2024 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2024_senate_district.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2024/escrutinio/legislativa.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PNP_1": "PNP_1", "PNP_2": "PNP_2", "PPD_1": "PPD_1", "PPD_2": "PPD_2", "MVC_1": "MVC_1", "PIP_1": "PIP_1", "PD_1": "PD_1", "PD_2": "PD_2", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7845, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 6839, "registered_not_positive": 3355, "cast_gt_registered": 2458, "invalid_gt_cast": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 7844, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:04:43.770180", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7845}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2b8b0e4d400b489385cf7db20e738b04", "name": "Puerto Rico 2024 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2024_senate_atlarge.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2024/escrutinio/legislativa.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PNP_1": "PNP_1", "PNP_2": "PNP_2", "PNP_3": "PNP_3", "PNP_4": "PNP_4", "PNP_5": "PNP_5", "PNP_6": "PNP_6", "PPD_1": "PPD_1", "PPD_2": "PPD_2", "PPD_3": "PPD_3", "PPD_4": "PPD_4", "PIP": "PIP", "PD": "PD", "IND_1": "IND_1", "IND_2": "IND_2", "IND_3": "IND_3", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7845, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2458, "invalid_gt_cast": 2, "cast_valid_mismatch": 5790, "registered_not_positive": 3355}, "n_stations_flagged": 7835, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:04:24.210034", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7845}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4841b454afa74148ac24bd1926195cfb", "name": "Puerto Rico 2024 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2024_resident_commissioner.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2024/escrutinio/estatal.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PNP": "PNP", "PPD": "PPD", "MVC": "MVC", "PIP": "PIP", "PD": "PD", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7845, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2498, "cast_valid_mismatch": 5793, "registered_not_positive": 3355}, "n_stations_flagged": 7827, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:04:03.969193", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7845}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9800190feb674591bae52e48d68390b8", "name": "Puerto Rico 2024 other (overnight puertorico_2024_president_straw.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "other", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2024/preliminares/presidencial.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"RPPR": "RPPR", "DPPR": "DPPR", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5408, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 4790, "registered_not_positive": 918, "cast_gt_registered": 504}, "n_stations_flagged": 5402, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:03:48.151896", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 5408}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fd4a236d2c3e4c10bcb084c1449c689c", "name": "Puerto Rico 2024 referendum (overnight puertorico_2024_plebiscite.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2024/preliminares/plebiscito.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"SLA": "SLA", "EST": "EST", "IND": "IND"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5408, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 4838, "registered_not_positive": 918, "cast_gt_registered": 502}, "n_stations_flagged": 5402, "created_at": "2026-07-12T20:03:34.090801", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 5408}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d2433d5fec97484e9ade1e96d507cc3a", "name": "Puerto Rico 2024 local (overnight puertorico_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2024/escrutinio/municipal.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PNP": "PNP", "PPD": "PPD", "MVC": "MVC", "PIP": "PIP", "PD": "PD", "IND": "IND", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7845, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2312, "cast_valid_mismatch": 4444, "registered_not_positive": 3355}, "n_stations_flagged": 7028, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:56:36.799772", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7845}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2cbad123ca894c89b34af49ae6707b1a", "name": "Puerto Rico 2024 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2024_house_district.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2024/escrutinio/legislativa.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PNP": "PNP", "PPD": "PPD", "MVC": "MVC", "PIP": "PIP", "PD": "PD", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7845, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 6054, "registered_not_positive": 3355, "cast_gt_registered": 2458}, "n_stations_flagged": 7843, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:56:11.556292", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7845}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f7db5930f3764518a8db5167e1ecf25f", "name": "Puerto Rico 2024 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2024_house_atlarge.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2024/escrutinio/legislativa.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PNP_1": "PNP_1", "PNP_2": "PNP_2", "PNP_3": "PNP_3", "PNP_4": "PNP_4", "PNP_5": "PNP_5", "PNP_6": "PNP_6", "PPD_1": "PPD_1", "PPD_2": "PPD_2", "PPD_3": "PPD_3", "PPD_4": "PPD_4", "PIP": "PIP", "PD": "PD", "IND": "IND", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7845, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2458, "invalid_gt_cast": 1, "cast_valid_mismatch": 5909, "registered_not_positive": 3355}, "n_stations_flagged": 7842, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:55:45.457498", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7845}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0552e52214b34aa7828d632b97e25146", "name": "Puerto Rico 2024 presidential (overnight puertorico_2024_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2024/escrutinio/estatal.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PNP": "PNP", "PPD": "PPD", "MVC": "MVC", "PIP": "PIP", "PD": "PD", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7845, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3771, "registered_not_positive": 3355, "cast_gt_registered": 2498}, "n_stations_flagged": 6374, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:55:13.177031", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7845}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bf9b57fd66b645a897723031995a78fd", "name": "Puerto Rico 2020 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2020_senate_district.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2020/escrutinio/Colegios.zip -> legislativa.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PNP_1": "PNP_1", "PNP_2": "PNP_2", "PPD_1": "PPD_1", "PPD_2": "PPD_2", "PIP_1": "PIP_1", "PIP_2": "PIP_2", "MVC_1": "MVC_1", "MVC_2": "MVC_2", "PD_1": "PD_1", "PD_2": "PD_2", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6327, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1220, "invalid_gt_cast": 4, "cast_valid_mismatch": 5723, "registered_not_positive": 1803}, "n_stations_flagged": 6323, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:54:49.025266", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6327}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "932991c153b8471aa905dc82c55cee1c", "name": "Puerto Rico 2020 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2020_senate_atlarge.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2020/escrutinio/Colegios.zip -> legislativa.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PNP_1": "PNP_1", "PNP_2": "PNP_2", "PNP_3": "PNP_3", "PNP_4": "PNP_4", "PNP_5": "PNP_5", "PNP_6": "PNP_6", "PPD_1": "PPD_1", "PPD_2": "PPD_2", "PPD_3": "PPD_3", "PPD_4": "PPD_4", "PPD_5": "PPD_5", "PPD_6": "PPD_6", "PIP": "PIP", "MVC_1": "MVC_1", "MVC_2": "MVC_2", "PD": "PD", "IND": "IND", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6327, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1220, "invalid_gt_cast": 2, "cast_valid_mismatch": 5435, "registered_not_positive": 1803}, "n_stations_flagged": 6300, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:54:26.765999", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6327}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a93a745577d04d3ba9f31fa51370fc9c", "name": "Puerto Rico 2020 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2020_resident_commissioner.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2020/escrutinio/Colegios.zip -> estatal.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PNP": "PNP", "PPD": "PPD", "PIP": "PIP", "MVC": "MVC", "PD": "PD", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6437, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1300, "cast_valid_mismatch": 5430, "registered_not_positive": 1913}, "n_stations_flagged": 6410, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:54:02.433639", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6437}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ad29c059bcc14aff8ecd59c695bdfe6d", "name": "Puerto Rico 2020 referendum (overnight puertorico_2020_plebiscite.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2020, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2020/escrutinio/Colegios.zip -> plebiscito.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"NO": "NO", "SI": "SI"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6327, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1216, "cast_valid_mismatch": 5187, "registered_not_positive": 1803}, "n_stations_flagged": 6221, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:53:37.972207", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6327}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d139541917b94b8cb96109378ef1d402", "name": "Puerto Rico 2020 local (overnight puertorico_2020_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2020, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2020/escrutinio/Colegios.zip -> municipal.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PNP": "PNP", "PPD": "PPD", "PIP": "PIP", "MVC": "MVC", "PD": "PD", "IND": "IND", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6327, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 4756, "registered_not_positive": 1803, "cast_gt_registered": 1277}, "n_stations_flagged": 5867, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:53:15.316749", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6327}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a50179f066d14931b1a5fb8377718e62", "name": "Puerto Rico 2020 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2020_house_district.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2020/escrutinio/Colegios.zip -> legislativa.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PNP": "PNP", "PPD": "PPD", "PIP": "PIP", "MVC": "MVC", "PD": "PD", "IND": "IND", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6327, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 5566, "registered_not_positive": 1803, "cast_gt_registered": 1220}, "n_stations_flagged": 6321, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:52:51.917103", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6327}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d5f83a046bc2481e8183fd57771ce132", "name": "Puerto Rico 2020 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2020_house_atlarge.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2020/escrutinio/Colegios.zip -> legislativa.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PNP_1": "PNP_1", "PNP_2": "PNP_2", "PNP_3": "PNP_3", "PNP_4": "PNP_4", "PNP_5": "PNP_5", "PNP_6": "PNP_6", "PPD_1": "PPD_1", "PPD_2": "PPD_2", "PPD_3": "PPD_3", "PPD_4": "PPD_4", "PPD_5": "PPD_5", "PPD_6": "PPD_6", "PIP": "PIP", "MVC_1": "MVC_1", "MVC_2": "MVC_2", "PD": "PD", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6327, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 5491, "registered_not_positive": 1803, "cast_gt_registered": 1220, "invalid_gt_cast": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 6319, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:52:29.297670", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6327}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "67758751e17d4bc4934b3d1f567bd98f", "name": "Puerto Rico 2020 presidential (overnight puertorico_2020_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2020, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2020/escrutinio/Colegios.zip -> estatal.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PNP": "PNP", "PPD": "PPD", "PIP": "PIP", "MVC": "MVC", "PD": "PD", "IND": "IND", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6437, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3488, "registered_not_positive": 1913, "cast_gt_registered": 1300}, "n_stations_flagged": 4911, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:52:05.219238", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6437}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "46e08d97ab3348a5b90edfd5aad70ab5", "name": "Puerto Rico 2016 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2016_senate_district.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2016/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PPD_1": "PPD_1", "PPD_2": "PPD_2", "PNP_1": "PNP_1", "PNP_2": "PNP_2", "PIP_1": "PIP_1", "PIP_2": "PIP_2", "PPT_1": "PPT_1", "PPT_2": "PPT_2", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1852, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1819, "registered_not_positive": 351, "cast_gt_registered": 331}, "n_stations_flagged": 1852, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:51:58.486528", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1852}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f5948336fbdb4a4bbb1fb04f46fb0184", "name": "Puerto Rico 2016 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2016_senate_atlarge.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2016/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PPD_1": "PPD_1", "PPD_2": "PPD_2", "PPD_3": "PPD_3", "PPD_4": "PPD_4", "PPD_5": "PPD_5", "PPD_6": "PPD_6", "PNP_1": "PNP_1", "PNP_2": "PNP_2", "PNP_3": "PNP_3", "PNP_4": "PNP_4", "PNP_5": "PNP_5", "PNP_6": "PNP_6", "PIP": "PIP", "PPT": "PPT", "IND": "IND", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1852, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1769, "registered_not_positive": 351, "cast_gt_registered": 331, "invalid_gt_cast": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1849, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:51:51.016833", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1852}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "78c93554e3954e4f8860fe572b19b8de", "name": "Puerto Rico 2016 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2016_resident_commissioner.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2016/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PPD": "PPD", "PNP": "PNP", "PIP": "PIP", "PPT": "PPT", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1852, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 335, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1792, "registered_not_positive": 351}, "n_stations_flagged": 1851, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:51:43.968292", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1852}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "322806681f6d4044a8e921003638fddd", "name": "Puerto Rico 2016 local (overnight puertorico_2016_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2016, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2016/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PPD": "PPD", "PNP": "PNP", "PIP": "PIP", "PPT": "PPT", "IND": "IND", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1852, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1689, "registered_not_positive": 351, "cast_gt_registered": 330, "invalid_gt_cast": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1810, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:51:37.265067", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1852}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e911ccca89ad42d1a67d6b15e0375243", "name": "Puerto Rico 2016 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2016_house_district.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2016/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PPD": "PPD", "PNP": "PNP", "PIP": "PIP", "PPT": "PPT", "IND": "IND", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1852, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1772, "registered_not_positive": 351, "cast_gt_registered": 331}, "n_stations_flagged": 1849, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:51:30.936462", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1852}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c4a3160c5a38429eb61fd9ca5fe3169a", "name": "Puerto Rico 2016 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2016_house_atlarge.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2016/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PPD_1": "PPD_1", "PPD_2": "PPD_2", "PPD_3": "PPD_3", "PPD_4": "PPD_4", "PPD_5": "PPD_5", "PPD_6": "PPD_6", "PNP_1": "PNP_1", "PNP_2": "PNP_2", "PNP_3": "PNP_3", "PNP_4": "PNP_4", "PNP_5": "PNP_5", "PNP_6": "PNP_6", "PIP": "PIP", "PPT": "PPT", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1852, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 331, "invalid_gt_cast": 1, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1781, "registered_not_positive": 351}, "n_stations_flagged": 1850, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:51:22.958057", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1852}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5f903932686048ea892904a22645b63c", "name": "Puerto Rico 2016 presidential (overnight puertorico_2016_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2016, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2016/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PPD": "PPD", "PNP": "PNP", "PIP": "PIP", "PPT": "PPT", "IND_1": "IND_1", "IND_2": "IND_2", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1852, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1614, "registered_not_positive": 351, "cast_gt_registered": 335}, "n_stations_flagged": 1742, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:51:16.512057", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1852}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cb3b8f130d6b482582783a913121e249", "name": "Puerto Rico 2012 referendum (overnight puertorico_2012_status_consulta_q2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2012, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2012/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"EST": "EST", "IND": "IND", "ELA": "ELA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1847, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1799, "registered_not_positive": 314, "cast_gt_registered": 272}, "n_stations_flagged": 1847, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:51:09.617329", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1847}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9cae8166a27944fca8cbe312ba290dc2", "name": "Puerto Rico 2012 referendum (overnight puertorico_2012_status_consulta_q1.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2012, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2012/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"SI": "SI", "NO": "NO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1847, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1787, "registered_not_positive": 314, "cast_gt_registered": 272}, "n_stations_flagged": 1846, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:51:02.096443", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1847}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2b721082d1a34ecd8e92d6760265772d", "name": "Puerto Rico 2012 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2012_senate_district.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2012/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PNP_1": "PNP_1", "PPD_1": "PPD_1", "PIP_1": "PIP_1", "MUS_1": "MUS_1", "PPR_1": "PPR_1", "PPT_1": "PPT_1", "IND": "IND", "OTR": "OTR", "PNP_2": "PNP_2", "PPD_2": "PPD_2", "PIP_2": "PIP_2", "MUS_2": "MUS_2", "PPR_2": "PPR_2", "PPT_2": "PPT_2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1847, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 272, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1824, "registered_not_positive": 314}, "n_stations_flagged": 1847, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:50:55.577031", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1847}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "aee9645b77604c19ad535c61d94a0bfd", "name": "Puerto Rico 2012 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2012_senate_atlarge.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2012/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PNP_1": "PNP_1", "PPD_1": "PPD_1", "PIP": "PIP", "MUS": "MUS", "PPR": "PPR", "PPT": "PPT", "IND": "IND", "OTR": "OTR", "PNP_2": "PNP_2", "PPD_2": "PPD_2", "PNP_3": "PNP_3", "PPD_3": "PPD_3", "PNP_4": "PNP_4", "PPD_4": "PPD_4", "PNP_5": "PNP_5", "PPD_5": "PPD_5", "PNP_6": "PNP_6", "PPD_6": "PPD_6"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1847, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1811, "registered_not_positive": 314, "cast_gt_registered": 272}, "n_stations_flagged": 1847, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:50:48.655537", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1847}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "031093d844544d82a1feac9c190ad9b6", "name": "Puerto Rico 2012 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2012_resident_commissioner.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2012/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PNP": "PNP", "PPD": "PPD", "PIP": "PIP", "MUS": "MUS", "PPR": "PPR", "PPT": "PPT", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1847, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 272, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1746, "registered_not_positive": 314}, "n_stations_flagged": 1837, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:50:41.593098", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1847}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c57ab66969af4abd8658dbff3792648a", "name": "Puerto Rico 2012 referendum (overnight puertorico_2012_referendum_legislatura.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2012, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2012/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"SI": "SI", "NO": "NO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1753, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 220, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1412, "registered_not_positive": 220}, "n_stations_flagged": 1503, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:50:35.064814", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1753}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8bc34d13d2fb4083b7837c5bca28c1e9", "name": "Puerto Rico 2012 referendum (overnight puertorico_2012_referendum_fianza.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2012, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2012/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"SI": "SI", "NO": "NO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1753, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 220, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1318, "registered_not_positive": 220}, "n_stations_flagged": 1422, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:50:28.767130", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1753}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "174c3725565b4069b03d5a129afdfb8b", "name": "Puerto Rico 2012 local (overnight puertorico_2012_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2012, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2012/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PNP": "PNP", "PPD": "PPD", "PIP": "PIP", "MUS": "MUS", "PPT": "PPT", "LCL": "LCL", "IND": "IND", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1847, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1761, "registered_not_positive": 314, "cast_gt_registered": 272, "invalid_gt_cast": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 1814, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:50:21.635430", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1847}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2e4a01da17054ef1ba70b0df55c1e8c1", "name": "Puerto Rico 2012 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2012_house_district.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2012/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PNP": "PNP", "PPD": "PPD", "PIP": "PIP", "MUS": "MUS", "PPR": "PPR", "PPT": "PPT", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1847, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1812, "registered_not_positive": 314, "cast_gt_registered": 272, "invalid_gt_cast": 19}, "n_stations_flagged": 1843, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:50:11.549541", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1847}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6babf127b7cf4fd7b66ffe73d02faad2", "name": "Puerto Rico 2012 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2012_house_atlarge.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2012/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PNP_1": "PNP_1", "PPD_1": "PPD_1", "PIP": "PIP", "MUS": "MUS", "PPR": "PPR", "PPT": "PPT", "IND": "IND", "OTR": "OTR", "PNP_2": "PNP_2", "PPD_2": "PPD_2", "PNP_3": "PNP_3", "PPD_3": "PPD_3", "PNP_4": "PNP_4", "PPD_4": "PPD_4", "PNP_5": "PNP_5", "PPD_5": "PPD_5", "PNP_6": "PNP_6", "PPD_6": "PPD_6"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1847, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 272, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1811, "registered_not_positive": 314}, "n_stations_flagged": 1845, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:49:59.627194", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1847}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "79eb3232b0234d3ea4ae2cd6ac0360bd", "name": "Puerto Rico 2012 presidential (overnight puertorico_2012_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2012, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2012/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PNP": "PNP", "PPD": "PPD", "PIP": "PIP", "MUS": "MUS", "PPR": "PPR", "PPT": "PPT", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1847, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1580, "registered_not_positive": 314, "cast_gt_registered": 272}, "n_stations_flagged": 1736, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:49:47.547412", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1847}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6790e18194624ff2a647fb3cf53b9323", "name": "Puerto Rico 2008 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2008_senate_district.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2008/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PPD_1": "PPD_1", "PNP_1": "PNP_1", "PIP_1": "PIP_1", "PPR_1": "PPR_1", "OTR": "OTR", "PPD_2": "PPD_2", "PNP_2": "PNP_2", "PIP_2": "PIP_2", "PPR_2": "PPR_2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1912, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1908, "registered_not_positive": 350, "cast_gt_registered": 347}, "n_stations_flagged": 1912, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:49:35.657155", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1912}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ac6ed9871f424c1f831f5d9fed47852f", "name": "Puerto Rico 2008 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2008_senate_atlarge.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2008/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PPD_1": "PPD_1", "PNP_1": "PNP_1", "PIP": "PIP", "PPR_1": "PPR_1", "IND": "IND", "OTR": "OTR", "PPD_2": "PPD_2", "PNP_2": "PNP_2", "PPR_2": "PPR_2", "PPD_3": "PPD_3", "PNP_3": "PNP_3", "PPR_3": "PPR_3", "PPD_4": "PPD_4", "PNP_4": "PNP_4", "PPR_4": "PPR_4", "PPD_5": "PPD_5", "PNP_5": "PNP_5", "PPD_6": "PPD_6", "PNP_6": "PNP_6"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1912, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 347, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1894, "registered_not_positive": 350}, "n_stations_flagged": 1911, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:49:24.128905", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1912}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "49ad992ed429454791411ef7803173a2", "name": "Puerto Rico 2008 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2008_resident_commissioner.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2008/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PPD": "PPD", "PNP": "PNP", "PIP": "PIP", "PPR": "PPR", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1912, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1856, "registered_not_positive": 350, "cast_gt_registered": 347}, "n_stations_flagged": 1906, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:49:11.851678", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1912}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "240068cc1ff242b6a88d985af0a39e3e", "name": "Puerto Rico 2008 local (overnight puertorico_2008_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2008, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2008/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PPD": "PPD", "PNP": "PNP", "PIP": "PIP", "LCL": "LCL", "IND": "IND", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1912, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1844, "registered_not_positive": 350, "cast_gt_registered": 347}, "n_stations_flagged": 1883, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:59.121999", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1912}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d1b50507bb9945c0af0cff7096602eb3", "name": "Puerto Rico 2008 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2008_house_district.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2008/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PPD": "PPD", "PNP": "PNP", "PIP": "PIP", "PPR": "PPR", "IND": "IND", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1912, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 347, "invalid_gt_cast": 2, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1883, "registered_not_positive": 350}, "n_stations_flagged": 1908, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:50.060569", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1912}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "05d5637ffcd54237913c580ca186cb58", "name": "Puerto Rico 2008 parliamentary (overnight puertorico_2008_house_atlarge.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2008/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PPD_1": "PPD_1", "PNP_1": "PNP_1", "PIP": "PIP", "PPR_1": "PPR_1", "OTR": "OTR", "PPD_2": "PPD_2", "PNP_2": "PNP_2", "PPR_2": "PPR_2", "PPD_3": "PPD_3", "PNP_3": "PNP_3", "PPR_3": "PPR_3", "PPD_4": "PPD_4", "PNP_4": "PNP_4", "PPR_4": "PPR_4", "PPD_5": "PPD_5", "PNP_5": "PNP_5", "PPR_5": "PPR_5", "PPD_6": "PPD_6", "PNP_6": "PNP_6"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1912, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1886, "registered_not_positive": 350, "cast_gt_registered": 347}, "n_stations_flagged": 1910, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:43.133749", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1912}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b1ca5e5eee9c474ebd868da42d515681", "name": "Puerto Rico 2008 presidential (overnight puertorico_2008_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Puerto Rico", "year": 2008, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionspuertorico.org/datos/2008/Unidades.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PPD": "PPD", "PNP": "PNP", "PIP": "PIP", "PPR": "PPR", "OTR": "OTR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1912, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 347, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1614, "registered_not_positive": 350}, "n_stations_flagged": 1761, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:37.011926", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1912}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9c672bad98704bd38a47bf173a229afc", "name": "Niger 2016 parliamentary (overnight ne_2016_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Niger", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/NE/NE.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"andp": "andp", "ard": "ard", "mnsd": "mnsd", "moden": "moden", "pna": "pna", "pnds": "pnds", "rsd": "rsd", "cds": "cds", "conir": "conir", "ppn-rda": "ppn-rda", "udr": "udr", "tele": "tele", "rdnc": "rdnc", "rdp": "rdp", "uni": "uni", "pdp": "pdp", "pund": "pund", "pcp": "pcp", "murna": "murna", "adn": "adn", "amen-amin": "amen-amin", "cdp": "cdp", "cdr": "cdr", "cpr": "cpr", "grb": "grb", "mnrd-psdn": "mnrd-psdn", "ipp": "ipp", "kuzari": "kuzari", "mota": "mota", "rakoumi": "rakoumi", "tanat": "tanat", "tartyt": "tartyt", "mdc": "mdc", "mdr": "mdr", "mncps": "mncps", "mpn": "mpn", "mpr": "mpr", "msrd": "msrd", "ngn": "ngn", "ps": "ps", "psd": "psd", "udps": "udps", "usdn": "usdn"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 2, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:36.738847", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.201, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.545, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.573, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.459, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.545, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.636, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.197, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.465, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.11, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.385, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.385, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.532, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.532, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Nigerien Party for Democracy and Socialism (PNDS)", "winner_candidate": "Mahamadou Issoufou", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Nigerien Democratic Movement for an African Federation (MODEN/FA Lumana)", "margin": 84.98, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "NER", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "60084d60b9804b0cbd9dd71f3b23be42", "name": "Niger 2011 parliamentary (overnight ne_2011_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Niger", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/NE/NE.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"andp": "andp", "ard": "ard", "mnsd": "mnsd", "moden": "moden", "pnds": "pnds", "rsd": "rsd", "cds": "cds", "psdn": "psdn", "conir": "conir", "ppn-rda": "ppn-rda", "udr": "udr", "pnd": "pnd", "tele": "tele", "pnrd": "pnrd", "racinn": "racinn", "udsn": "udsn", "cnrd": "cnrd", "rdnc": "rdnc", "rdp": "rdp", "uni": "uni", "pdp": "pdp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:36.530472", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.426, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.7, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.541, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.39, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.426, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.7, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.036, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.133, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.533, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.114, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.308, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.668, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.541, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.541, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.39, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.39, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.393, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.393, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.563, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.583, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.583, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": null, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "NER", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 14}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f9496605cb474d5294ee0d887e54ae9c", "name": "Niger 2004 parliamentary (overnight ne_2004_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Niger", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/NE/NE.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"andp": "andp", "mnsd": "mnsd", "pnds": "pnds", "rsd": "rsd", "cds": "cds", "psdn": "psdn", "udr": "udr", "udsn": "udsn", "rdp": "rdp", "pdp": "pdp", "pund": "pund", "daraja": "daraja", "rsd-rdp": "rsd-rdp", "pnds1": "pnds1", "mpsp": "mpsp", "udfp": "udfp", "pnds2": "pnds2", "pmt-andp": "pmt-andp", "katsina": "katsina", "updp": "updp", "pcp": "pcp", "murna": "murna", "pnds3": "pnds3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 16, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 16, "registered_not_positive": 16, "votes_gt_valid": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 16, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:36.347557", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.391, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.081, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.547, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.409, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.391, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.081, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.072, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.114, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.279, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.15, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.547, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.547, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.409, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.409, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.375, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.375, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.635, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.586, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.586, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 31.06, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "NER", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 16}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7f3f52c88a8e4c7b937ad37cd5da7867", "name": "Niger 1993 parliamentary (overnight ne_1993_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Niger", "year": 1993, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/NE/NE.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"andp": "andp", "mnsd": "mnsd", "pnds": "pnds", "upds": "upds", "cds": "cds", "psdn": "psdn", "ppn-rda": "ppn-rda", "pund": "pund", "udfp": "udfp", "pmt": "pmt", "updp": "updp", "mdp": "mdp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 16, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 1, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:36.164372", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.401, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.565, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.528, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.399, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.401, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.565, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.069, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.34, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.585, "year": 1993, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.874, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.528, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.528, "year": 1993, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.399, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.399, "year": 1993, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.37, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 1993, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.685, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 1993, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.548, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 1993, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.764, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "CDS-Rahama", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "MNSD-Nassara", "margin": 8.84, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "NER", "year": 1993, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 16}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "138af34d28cb49e9aa9a498eaa9578eb", "name": "Namibia 2014 parliamentary (overnight na_2014_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Namibia", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/NA/NA.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"dta": "dta", "swanu": "swanu", "swapo": "swapo", "udf": "udf", "nudo": "nudo", "rp": "rp", "app": "app", "dpn": "dpn", "ndp": "ndp", "rdp": "rdp", "cdv": "cdv", "neff": "neff", "upm": "upm", "wrp": "wrp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 122, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 9, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 9, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:35.669200", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.295, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.654, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.656, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.542, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.295, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.535, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.652, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.663, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.706, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.115, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.388, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.656, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.542, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.542, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.437, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.19, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.19, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "SWAPO", "winner_candidate": "Hage Geingob", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "DTA", "margin": 81.76, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "NAM", "year": 2014, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 122}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "96eeb27347fd4c2eafb92959f0494555", "name": "Namibia 2009 parliamentary (overnight na_2009_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Namibia", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/NA/NA.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"dta": "dta", "swanu": "swanu", "swapo": "swapo", "udf": "udf", "ndmc": "ndmc", "nudo": "nudo", "rp": "rp", "app": "app", "dpn": "dpn", "ndp": "ndp", "rdp": "rdp", "wrp": "wrp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 108, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 108, "cast_gt_registered": 108}, "n_stations_flagged": 108, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:35.203863", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.033, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.361, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.655, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.541, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.033, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.758, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.361, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.106, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.487, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.647, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.662, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.296, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.655, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.541, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.541, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.433, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.433, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.19, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.19, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "SWAPO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "RDP", "margin": 72.18, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "NAM", "year": 2009, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 108}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "70330f27d1ed42d79cad9c755e988224", "name": "Mozambique 2014 parliamentary (overnight mz_2014_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mozambique", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/MZ/MZ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pt": "pt", "sol": "sol", "renamo": "renamo", "ue": "ue", "frelimo": "frelimo", "pimo": "pimo", "panaoc": "panaoc", "pasomo": "pasomo", "alimo": "alimo", "parena": "parena", "pec-mt": "pec-mt", "ppd": "ppd", "um": "um", "pvm": "pvm", "mpd": "mpd", "pld": "pld", "pazs": "pazs", "prds": "prds", "mdm": "mdm", "mjrd": "mjrd", "uasp": "uasp", "pahumo": "pahumo", "pareso": "pareso", "pumild": "pumild", "monarumo": "monarumo", "pdd-ad": "pdd-ad", "pppm": "pppm", "pasdi": "pasdi", "pur": "pur"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": "province", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 1, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:35.045404", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.154, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.121, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.43, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.299, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.154, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.121, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.53, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.033, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.258, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.08, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.27, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.319, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.43, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.43, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.299, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.299, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.285, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.285, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.504, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.504, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.718, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.718, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "FRELIMO", "winner_candidate": "Filipe Nyusi", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "RENAMO", "margin": 20.42, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MOZ", "year": 2014, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 11}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1f0436b98e8143a39585b674dcc25410", "name": "Mozambique 2009 parliamentary (overnight mz_2009_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mozambique", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/MZ/MZ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pt": "pt", "renamo": "renamo", "ue": "ue", "frelimo": "frelimo", "panaoc": "panaoc", "alimo": "alimo", "udm": "udm", "parena": "parena", "pec-mt": "pec-mt", "pdd": "pdd", "ppd": "ppd", "um": "um", "pvm": "pvm", "mpd": "mpd", "pld": "pld", "pazs": "pazs", "prds": "prds", "mdm": "mdm", "adacd": "adacd"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13, "granularity": "province", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:34.854977", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.092, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.209, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.453, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.307, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.092, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.523, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.209, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.264, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.075, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.269, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.221, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.305, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.649, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.453, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.453, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.307, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.307, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.289, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.747, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.747, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.519, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.519, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "FRELIMO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "RENAMO", "margin": 58.6, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MOZ", "year": 2009, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 13}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "61eb9ba3949a431baf8677d417b78984", "name": "Mozambique 2004 parliamentary (overnight mz_2004_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mozambique", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/MZ/MZ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pt": "pt", "sol": "sol", "renamo-ue": "renamo-ue", "ud": "ud", "frelimo": "frelimo", "pimo": "pimo", "palmo": "palmo", "padelimo": "padelimo", "pasomo": "pasomo", "parena": "parena", "pec-mt": "pec-mt", "pdd": "pdd", "ppd": "ppd", "pvm": "pvm", "pazs": "pazs", "parede": "parede", "fao": "fao", "mbg": "mbg", "cdu": "cdu", "usamo": "usamo"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13, "granularity": "province", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:34.668103", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.609, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.581, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.425, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.296, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.693, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.46, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.285, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.321, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.261, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.315, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.432, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.358, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.425, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.425, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.296, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.296, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.283, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.283, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.69, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.69, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.519, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.519, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "FRELIMO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "RENAMO", "margin": 32.0, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MOZ", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 13}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ba70e91a44b84317b9443a2fb65b203a", "name": "Mozambique 1999 parliamentary (overnight mz_1999_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mozambique", "year": 1999, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/MZ/MZ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pt": "pt", "sol": "sol", "renamo-ue": "renamo-ue", "ud": "ud", "umo": "umo", "frelimo": "frelimo", "pimo": "pimo", "palmo": "palmo", "panaoc": "panaoc", "pplm": "pplm", "padelimo": "padelimo", "pasomo": "pasomo"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": "province", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:34.502801", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.738, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.208, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.453, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.298, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.208, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.512, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.273, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.285, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.321, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.324, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.433, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.358, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.453, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.453, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.298, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.298, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.295, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.682, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "FRELIMO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "RENAMO", "margin": 4.0, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MOZ", "year": 1999, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 11}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9594d750192f404c884ec8ce66bcba77", "name": "Montserrat 2014 parliamentary (overnight ms_2014_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Montserrat", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/MS/MS.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"mcp1": "mcp1", "mcp2": "mcp2", "mcp3": "mcp3", "mcp4": "mcp4", "mcp5": "mcp5", "mcp6": "mcp6", "mcp7": "mcp7", "mcp8": "mcp8", "mcp9": "mcp9", "aic1": "aic1", "aic2": "aic2", "aic3": "aic3", "pdm1": "pdm1", "pdm2": "pdm2", "pdm3": "pdm3", "pdm4": "pdm4", "pdm5": "pdm5", "pdm6": "pdm6", "pdm7": "pdm7", "pdm8": "pdm8", "pdm9": "pdm9", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5", "ind6": "ind6", "ind7": "ind7", "ind8": "ind8", "ind9": "ind9", "ind10": "ind10"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 6, "registered_not_positive": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:34.365194", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "05e10b68e1f5459ea1e3e2652fa46155", "name": "Marshall Islands 2011 parliamentary (overnight mh_2011_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Marshall Islands", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/MH/MH.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"abacca-anjain-maddison": "abacca-anjain-maddison", "aeto-bantol": "aeto-bantol", "alee-k-alik": "alee-k-alik", "alvin-t-jacklick": "alvin-t-jacklick", "amentha-matthew": "amentha-matthew", "ataji-balos": "ataji-balos", "atbi-a-riklon": "atbi-a-riklon", "atones-kaious": "atones-kaious", "augustine-b-nakamura": "augustine-b-nakamura", "brenson-s-wase": "brenson-s-wase", "bruce-bilimon": "bruce-bilimon", "caios-lucky": "caios-lucky", "caster-konou": "caster-konou", "christoper-j-loeak": "christoper-j-loeak", "christopher-debrum": "christopher-debrum", "clann-a-lewis": "clann-a-lewis", "clary-makroro": "clary-makroro", "daisy-alik-momotaro": "daisy-alik-momotaro", "danny-f-jack": "danny-f-jack", "darlene-kalise-korok": "darlene-kalise-korok", "david-kabua": "david-kabua", "david-kramer": "david-kramer", "dennis-momotaro": "dennis-momotaro", "donald-f-capelle": "donald-f-capelle", "emil-debrum": "emil-debrum", "evelyn-lanki": "evelyn-lanki", "fredrick-h-muller": "fredrick-h-muller", "fredrick-jitto-debrum": "fredrick-jitto-debrum", "gerald-m-zackios-451": "gerald-m-zackios-451", "gordon-note": "gordon-note", "hackney-takju": "hackney-takju", "harney-a-paul": "harney-a-paul", "helkena-anni": "helkena-anni", "hilda-heine": "hilda-heine", "hilton-tonton-kendall": "hilton-tonton-kendall", "hiroshi-vitus-yamamura": "hiroshi-vitus-yamamura", "jack-j-ading": "jack-j-ading", "jack-jorbon": "jack-jorbon", "james-capelle": "james-capelle", "jamurlok-k-kabua": "jamurlok-k-kabua", "jeban-riklon": "jeban-riklon", "jeimata-nokko-kabua": "jeimata-nokko-kabua", "jejwarik-h-anton": "jejwarik-h-anton", "jerakoj-jerry-bejang": "jerakoj-jerry-bejang", "jiba-b-kabua": "jiba-b-kabua", "jim-jemton-philippo": "jim-jemton-philippo", "jimmy-jonathan": "jimmy-jonathan", "joe-hanchor": "joe-hanchor", "john-bungitak": "john-bungitak", "john-m-silk": "john-m-silk", "johnny-choban": "johnny-choban", "juan-t-lokot": "juan-t-lokot", "jurelang-zedkaia": "jurelang-zedkaia", "justin-lani": "justin-lani", "kaiboke-j-kabua": "kaiboke-j-kabua", "kejjo-bien": "kejjo-bien", "kenneth-a-kedi": "kenneth-a-kedi", "kessai-h-note": "kessai-h-note", "langmos-hermios": "langmos-hermios", "litokwa-tomeing": "litokwa-tomeing", "losan-e-chinoska": "losan-e-chinoska", "luckner-k-abner": "luckner-k-abner", "march-samuel": "march-samuel", "marie-maddison": "marie-maddison", "marilyn-j-kabua": "marilyn-j-kabua", "mattlan-zackhras": "mattlan-zackhras", "maynard-alfred": "maynard-alfred", "michael-m-kabua": "michael-m-kabua", "michael-maika-konelious": "michael-maika-konelious", "mike-halferty": "mike-halferty", "nidel-lorak": "nidel-lorak", "obet-j-mote": "obet-j-mote", "phillip-muller": "phillip-muller", "rellong-d-lemari": "rellong-d-lemari", "richard-a-bruce": "richard-a-bruce", "rien-j-morris": "rien-j-morris", "rino-j-phillip": "rino-j-phillip", "rosalie-aten-konou": "rosalie-aten-konou", "ruben-r-zackhras": "ruben-r-zackhras", "rudloph-paul": "rudloph-paul", "russell-langrine": "russell-langrine", "tadashi-gushi-lometo": "tadashi-gushi-lometo", "thomas-heine": "thomas-heine", "tom-d-kijiner": "tom-d-kijiner", "tomaki-juda": "tomaki-juda", "tony-aiseia": "tony-aiseia", "tony-de-brum": "tony-de-brum", "tony-muller": "tony-muller", "wilbur-allen": "wilbur-allen", "wilbur-heine": "wilbur-heine", "william-j-swain": "william-j-swain", "yoster-ishmael-john": "yoster-ishmael-john"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 24, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 22, "registered_not_positive": 24}, "n_stations_flagged": 24, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:34.150107", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 24}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "644386107bbb48e589093ee1a2429d46", "name": "Marshall Islands 2007 parliamentary (overnight mh_2007_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Marshall Islands", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/MH/MH.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"abacca-anjain-maddison": "abacca-anjain-maddison", "abo-a-loeak": "abo-a-loeak", "alee-k-alik": "alee-k-alik", "alik-j-alik": "alik-j-alik", "alvin-t-jacklick": "alvin-t-jacklick", "amatlain-e-kabua": "amatlain-e-kabua", "amenta-matthew": "amenta-matthew", "anna-neiten-anien": "anna-neiten-anien", "ataji-l-balos": "ataji-l-balos", "atbi-a-riklon": "atbi-a-riklon", "billy-a-billy": "billy-a-billy", "biuma-samson": "biuma-samson", "brenson-s-wase": "brenson-s-wase", "caios-e-lucky": "caios-e-lucky", "carl-heine": "carl-heine", "charles-debrum": "charles-debrum", "christoper-j-loeak": "christoper-j-loeak", "danny-jack": "danny-jack", "david-kabua": "david-kabua", "david-kramer": "david-kramer", "dennis-momotaro": "dennis-momotaro", "donald-f-capelle": "donald-f-capelle", "edwin-c-lakien": "edwin-c-lakien", "elmer-l-langbata": "elmer-l-langbata", "emil-debrum": "emil-debrum", "francis-horiuchi": "francis-horiuchi", "frederick-kano-muller": "frederick-kano-muller", "fredrick-jitto-debrum": "fredrick-jitto-debrum", "gerald-zackios": "gerald-zackios", "gordon-note": "gordon-note", "hackney-takju": "hackney-takju", "harney-atjang-paul": "harney-atjang-paul", "helkena-j-anni": "helkena-j-anni", "hemos-a-jack": "hemos-a-jack", "heran-bellu": "heran-bellu", "hilda-cathy-heine": "hilda-cathy-heine", "hiroshi-vitus-yamamura": "hiroshi-vitus-yamamura", "homer-graham": "homer-graham", "irumne-bondrik": "irumne-bondrik", "jack-j-ading": "jack-j-ading", "jack-jorbon": "jack-jorbon", "jakeo-relang": "jakeo-relang", "jeban-riklon": "jeban-riklon", "jerakoj-jerry-bejang": "jerakoj-jerry-bejang", "jiba-kabua": "jiba-kabua", "john-kunar-bungitak": "john-kunar-bungitak", "john-m-silk": "john-m-silk", "jolbo-samuel": "jolbo-samuel", "juan-t-lokot": "juan-t-lokot", "jurelang-zedkaia": "jurelang-zedkaia", "kaiboke-j-kabua": "kaiboke-j-kabua", "kejjo-bien": "kejjo-bien", "kenneth-a-kedi": "kenneth-a-kedi", "kessai-note": "kessai-note", "lenest-lanki": "lenest-lanki", "litokwa-tomeing": "litokwa-tomeing", "luckner-kunar-abner": "luckner-kunar-abner", "marcella-jonathan-sakaio": "marcella-jonathan-sakaio", "march-j-samuel": "march-j-samuel", "mattlan-zackhras": "mattlan-zackhras", "maynard-alfred": "maynard-alfred", "melvin-narruhn": "melvin-narruhn", "michael-m-kabua": "michael-m-kabua", "micheal-m-konelios": "micheal-m-konelios", "mike-halferty": "mike-halferty", "mishael-john": "mishael-john", "namar-n-nashon": "namar-n-nashon", "nidel-lorak": "nidel-lorak", "norman-matthew": "norman-matthew", "patrick-bokedikdik-langmoir": "patrick-bokedikdik-langmoir", "phillip-muller": "phillip-muller", "rellong-d-lemari": "rellong-d-lemari", "rien-j-morris": "rien-j-morris", "rino-j-phillip": "rino-j-phillip", "rod-nakamura": "rod-nakamura", "rosalie-aten-konou": "rosalie-aten-konou", "ruben-r-zackhras": "ruben-r-zackhras", "ruman-jorbal": "ruman-jorbal", "sato-a-maie": "sato-a-maie", "stephen-kodi-dribo": "stephen-kodi-dribo", "tadashi-gushi-lometo": "tadashi-gushi-lometo", "tom-d-kijiner": "tom-d-kijiner", "tomaki-juda": "tomaki-juda", "tony-a-debrum": "tony-a-debrum", "tony-s-aiseia": "tony-s-aiseia", "weiner-lavin-kattil": "weiner-lavin-kattil", "wilfred-i-kendall": "wilfred-i-kendall", "william-j-swain": "william-j-swain", "witten-t-philippo": "witten-t-philippo"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 24, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 23, "registered_not_positive": 24}, "n_stations_flagged": 24, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:33.807454", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 24}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "836891fd84c0436b9dedd742725f6692", "name": "Marshall Islands 2003 parliamentary (overnight mh_2003_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Marshall Islands", "year": 2003, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/MH/MH.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"abacca-a-maddison": "abacca-a-maddison", "adelbert-laukon": "adelbert-laukon", "alden-jacklick": "alden-jacklick", "alee-alik": "alee-alik", "aless-leit": "aless-leit", "alik-j-alik": "alik-j-alik", "allen-lanki": "allen-lanki", "alvin-jacklick": "alvin-jacklick", "amentha-matthew": "amentha-matthew", "antionio-eliu": "antionio-eliu", "ataji-balos": "ataji-balos", "atbi-riklong": "atbi-riklong", "bill-capelle": "bill-capelle", "bobby-muller": "bobby-muller", "botlan-loeak": "botlan-loeak", "brenson-s-wase": "brenson-s-wase", "caious-lucky": "caious-lucky", "carl-lan-heine": "carl-lan-heine", "carmen-m-bigler": "carmen-m-bigler", "charles-t-domnick": "charles-t-domnick", "christopher-j-loeak": "christopher-j-loeak", "david-kabua": "david-kabua", "david-kramer": "david-kramer", "dennis-momotaro": "dennis-momotaro", "donald-f-capelle": "donald-f-capelle", "donsay-hemos": "donsay-hemos", "edwin-c-lakien": "edwin-c-lakien", "elson-helkena": "elson-helkena", "fountain-inok": "fountain-inok", "frank-a-horuichi": "frank-a-horuichi", "frederick-kano-muller": "frederick-kano-muller", "fredrick-j-debrum": "fredrick-j-debrum", "gerald-zackios": "gerald-zackios", "helkena-anni": "helkena-anni", "hemos-jack": "hemos-jack", "hiroshi-yamamura": "hiroshi-yamamura", "irumne-bondrik": "irumne-bondrik", "ishmael-john": "ishmael-john", "jack-jorbon": "jack-jorbon", "jeban-rikon": "jeban-rikon", "jerry-j-bejang": "jerry-j-bejang", "jiba-kabua": "jiba-kabua", "jien-lekka": "jien-lekka", "joe-e-riklon": "joe-e-riklon", "john-bungitak": "john-bungitak", "john-m-milne": "john-m-milne", "john-silk": "john-silk", "johnny-luther": "johnny-luther", "julian-lajar": "julian-lajar", "julian-riklong": "julian-riklong", "jurelang-zedkaia": "jurelang-zedkaia", "justin-debrum": "justin-debrum", "kaiboke-kabua": "kaiboke-kabua", "katzuo-j-kotjang": "katzuo-j-kotjang", "kenneth-a-kedi": "kenneth-a-kedi", "langinwos-lakjohn": "langinwos-lakjohn", "langmos-n-hermios": "langmos-n-hermios", "luckner-k-abner": "luckner-k-abner", "main-last": "main-last", "mattlan-zachras": "mattlan-zachras", "maynard-alfred": "maynard-alfred", "michael-kabua": "michael-kabua", "mike-konelious": "mike-konelious", "mokka-daniel": "mokka-daniel", "namar-nashon": "namar-nashon", "nan": "nan", "nidel-lorak": "nidel-lorak", "phillip-muller": "phillip-muller", "rellong-lemari": "rellong-lemari", "rien-morris": "rien-morris", "rimes-ring": "rimes-ring", "rino-phillip": "rino-phillip", "risen-hensen": "risen-hensen", "rosalie-aten-konou": "rosalie-aten-konou", "ruben-r-zachrias": "ruben-r-zachrias", "samson-yoshitaro": "samson-yoshitaro", "sapong-keju": "sapong-keju", "sato-maie": "sato-maie", "steve-k-dribo": "steve-k-dribo", "taji-anjo": "taji-anjo", "tani-heron": "tani-heron", "thomas-kijiner-jr": "thomas-kijiner-jr", "tom-d-kijiner": "tom-d-kijiner", "tony-debrum": "tony-debrum", "tony-sober-phillips": "tony-sober-phillips", "wallace-peter": "wallace-peter", "wilfred-i-kendall": "wilfred-i-kendall", "wilton-buruno": "wilton-buruno", "wine-leit": "wine-leit", "witten-t-phillipo": "witten-t-phillipo"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 24, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 24, "cast_gt_registered": 22}, "n_stations_flagged": 24, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:33.449180", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 24}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cbeceef613d64043a47e873bf861b504", "name": "Madagascar 2014 parliamentary (overnight mg_2014_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Madagascar", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/MG/MG.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ame": "ame", "amp": "amp", "antoko-maitso": "antoko-maitso", "antoko-maitso-hasin-i-madagasikara": "antoko-maitso-hasin-i-madagasikara", "arema": "arema", "avana": "avana", "emma": "emma", "enina": "enina", "f-soatra": "f-soatra", "fff": "fff", "g-f-f-m": "g-f-f-m", "gffm-gideona-fandresena-ny-fahantrana-eto-madagasikara": "gffm-gideona-fandresena-ny-fahantrana-eto-madagasikara", "gmt-gasy-manankarena-no-tanjona": "gmt-gasy-manankarena-no-tanjona", "harena": "harena", "hiaraka-isika": "hiaraka-isika", "ind-pendant-navony-sahoby": "ind-pendant-navony-sahoby", "ind-pendant-saia": "ind-pendant-saia", "independant": "independant", "independant-bakoize-lucien": "independant-bakoize-lucien", "independant-faharo": "independant-faharo", "independant-halidy": "independant-halidy", "independant-rakotondrazaka-samuel": "independant-rakotondrazaka-samuel", "independant-tarika": "independant-tarika", "leader-fanilo": "leader-fanilo", "les-as": "les-as", "malagasy-miara-miainga-mmm": "malagasy-miara-miainga-mmm", "malagasy-tonga-saina-mts": "malagasy-tonga-saina-mts", "mamafisoa": "mamafisoa", "maman": "maman", "mfm": "mfm", "miaraka-amin-i-andry-rajoelina": "miaraka-amin-i-andry-rajoelina", "miaraka-amin-i-prezida-andry-rajoelina": "miaraka-amin-i-prezida-andry-rajoelina", "miaraka-prezida-andry-rajoelina-mapar": "miaraka-prezida-andry-rajoelina-mapar", "mibanjina": "mibanjina", "mitm-malagasy-iray-tsy-mivaky": "mitm-malagasy-iray-tsy-mivaky", "mouvance-ravalomanana": "mouvance-ravalomanana", "mts": "mts", "obama": "obama", "parti-avana": "parti-avana", "pnj-mazava": "pnj-mazava", "rds": "rds", "tgv": "tgv", "vpm-mmm": "vpm-mmm", "vpmmmm": "vpmmmm", "zanak-i-dada": "zanak-i-dada"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:33.160940", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.142, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.245, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.463, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.232, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.142, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.245, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.453, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.712, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.428, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.309, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.327, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.112, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.278, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.463, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.463, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.232, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.232, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.223, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.223, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.747, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.747, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.28, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.28, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.77, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": null, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "MDG", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "764dfb9fccc64f3886761a13e39b4f74", "name": "Lesotho 2017 parliamentary (overnight ls_2017_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Lesotho", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LS/LS.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"bcp": "bcp", "mfp": "mfp", "bnp": "bnp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "pfd": "pfd", "nip": "nip", "lcd": "lcd", "lpc": "lpc", "lwp": "lwp", "bdnp": "bdnp", "abc": "abc", "adc": "adc", "aum": "aum", "lmm": "lmm", "ssd": "ssd", "whp": "whp", "baena": "baena", "banc": "banc", "cfm": "cfm", "dc-v-1": "dc-v-1", "hdp": "hdp", "rcl": "rcl", "tsd": "tsd", "ad": "ad", "bts": "bts", "dpl": "dpl", "mdm": "mdm", "mec": "mec", "tru": "tru"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 80, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:32.722135", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.89, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.316, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.501, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.372, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.316, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.713, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.678, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.346, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.286, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.962, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.49, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.501, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.501, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.372, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.421, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.697, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.697, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.495, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.495, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.688, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 80}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5a4cc1be42ff4d1399627332cfe55a4b", "name": "Lesotho 2015 parliamentary (overnight ls_2015_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Lesotho", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LS/LS.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"bcp": "bcp", "mfp": "mfp", "bnp": "bnp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "pfd": "pfd", "nip": "nip", "lcd": "lcd", "lpc": "lpc", "lwp": "lwp", "bdnp": "bdnp", "bbdp": "bbdp", "abc": "abc", "adc": "adc", "aum": "aum", "lmm": "lmm", "whp": "whp", "baena": "baena", "banc": "banc", "cfm": "cfm", "dc-v-1": "dc-v-1", "hdp": "hdp", "pd": "pd", "rcl": "rcl", "tsd": "tsd"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 80, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:32.339858", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.975, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.556, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.597, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.445, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.975, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.731, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.416, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.604, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.346, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.286, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.144, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.536, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.445, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.485, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.785, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.559, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.7, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 80}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6358627b800d44cf8816dbc8bace2419", "name": "Lesotho 1998 parliamentary (overnight ls_1998_parliamentary_pr.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Lesotho", "year": 1998, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LS/LS.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"kbp": "kbp", "sdu": "sdu"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 80, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:31.932295", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.148, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.859, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.371, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.288, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.148, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.859, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.465, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.153, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.952, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.611, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.417, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.288, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.328, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.735, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.592, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.592, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 80}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8f289c9fb69c467a96d0306ef96198b3", "name": "Lesotho 1998 parliamentary (overnight ls_1998_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Lesotho", "year": 1998, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LS/LS.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"bcp": "bcp", "mfp": "mfp", "bnp": "bnp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "pfd": "pfd", "nip": "nip", "lep": "lep", "kbp": "kbp", "lcd": "lcd", "npp": "npp", "llpudp": "llpudp", "sdu": "sdu", "cdp": "cdp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 80, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1, "registered_not_positive": 1, "votes_gt_valid": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:31.628757", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.148, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.859, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.371, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.288, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.148, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.859, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.465, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.153, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.952, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.611, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.417, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.288, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.328, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.735, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.592, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.592, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 80}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "85990b64e8284cc1bee5e45401c6c40d", "name": "Lesotho 1993 parliamentary (overnight ls_1993_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Lesotho", "year": 1993, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LS/LS.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"bcp": "bcp", "mfp": "mfp", "bnp": "bnp", "ind1": "ind1", "udp": "udp", "pfd": "pfd", "hb": "hb", "lpl": "lpl", "llp": "llp", "up": "up", "lep": "lep", "kbp": "kbp", "lcd": "lcd"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 65, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 65, "registered_not_positive": 65, "votes_gt_valid": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 65, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:31.321612", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.043, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.106, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.501, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.36, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.043, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.106, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.526, "year": 1993, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.595, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.153, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.952, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.611, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 1993, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 1993, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.501, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.501, "year": 1993, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.36, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.36, "year": 1993, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.412, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 1993, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 1993, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.682, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 1993, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 65}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3d2d2dcd3d0c454097e9e20f67a06291", "name": "Lesotho 1970 parliamentary (overnight ls_1970_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Lesotho", "year": 1970, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LS/LS.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"bcp": "bcp", "mfp": "mfp", "bnp": "bnp", "ind1": "ind1", "udp": "udp", "lcp": "lcp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 60, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 60, "registered_not_positive": 60}, "n_stations_flagged": 60, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:30.993270", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.619, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.779, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.141, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.111, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 1970, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.779, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 1970, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.093, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.773, "year": 1970, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.196, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 1970, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.235, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.309, "year": 1970, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 1970, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 1970, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.111, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.111, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.18, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.18, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.353, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.353, "year": 1970, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 1970, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.596, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.596, "year": 1970, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.248, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.248, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 60}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1e787f81c2b444c29d48d6503a1f5143", "name": "Lesotho 1965 parliamentary (overnight ls_1965_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Lesotho", "year": 1965, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LS/LS.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"bcp": "bcp", "mfp": "mfp", "bnp": "bnp", "mtp": "mtp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 60, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 58, "registered_not_positive": 60}, "n_stations_flagged": 60, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:30.724631", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.847, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.206, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.15, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.718, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.242, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.555, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 1965, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.212, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.797, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 1965, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.431, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.358, "year": 1965, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.206, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.206, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.15, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.15, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.135, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.135, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.34, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.34, "year": 1965, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 60}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "96397eb0f36741f3b337b6106a782da2", "name": "Liberia 2017 parliamentary (overnight lr_2017_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Liberia", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LR/LR.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cdc": "cdc", "gdpl": "gdpl", "linu": "linu", "lp": "lp", "lrp": "lrp", "ltp": "ltp", "mpc": "mpc", "up": "up", "vcp": "vcp", "alp": "alp", "anc": "anc", "cda": "cda", "clp": "clp", "djp": "djp", "lfp": "lfp", "lpp": "lpp", "mdr": "mdr", "movee": "movee", "nlp": "nlp", "pup": "pup", "rdc": "rdc", "twp": "twp", "upp": "upp", "volt": "volt", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5", "ind6": "ind6"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 73, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 73, "cast_gt_registered": 71}, "n_stations_flagged": 73, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:30.412065", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.891, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.719, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.62, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.459, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.719, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.621, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.486, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.605, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.267, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.567, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.606, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.402, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.62, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.62, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.649, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 73}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d62c4470292445649437481de91c8fd4", "name": "Liberia 2011 parliamentary (overnight lr_2011_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Liberia", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LR/LR.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"alcop": "alcop", "apd": "apd", "cdc": "cdc", "cup": "cup", "fapl": "fapl", "gdpl": "gdpl", "ldp": "ldp", "lep": "lep", "linu": "linu", "lp": "lp", "lrp": "lrp", "ltp": "ltp", "maj": "maj", "mpc": "mpc", "ndc": "ndc", "ndpl": "ndpl", "npp": "npp", "nrp": "nrp", "nsdpl": "nsdpl", "nudp": "nudp", "ocpol": "ocpol", "ppp": "ppp", "prodem": "prodem", "rpl": "rpl", "uld": "uld", "up": "up", "vcp": "vcp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5", "ind6": "ind6", "ind7": "ind7", "ind8": "ind8"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 73, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 73, "registered_not_positive": 73, "votes_gt_valid": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 73, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:30.043797", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.931, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.386, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.646, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.487, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.386, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.341, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.553, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.862, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.401, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.487, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.487, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "UP", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "CDC", "margin": 81.43, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "LBR", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 73}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2cf558da012246dda48d4563d2172536", "name": "Saint Lucia 2016 parliamentary (overnight lc_2016_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Lucia", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LC/LC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"uwp": "uwp", "slp": "slp", "lpm": "lpm", "ind-v1": "ind-v1", "ind-v2": "ind-v2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:29.817834", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fffadaa74c9d44a78fd8ed5ee3e350b1", "name": "Saint Lucia 2011 parliamentary (overnight lc_2011_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Lucia", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LC/LC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"uwp": "uwp", "slp": "slp", "lg": "lg", "lpm": "lpm", "ndm": "ndm", "ind-v1": "ind-v1", "ind-v2": "ind-v2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1, "cast_valid_mismatch": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:29.664976", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "15ed09768d27460c9fba55c28915701f", "name": "Saint Lucia 2006 parliamentary (overnight lc_2006_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Lucia", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LC/LC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"uwp": "uwp", "slp": "slp", "ind-v1": "ind-v1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:29.501496", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2d9b93ef5c114f328ec18327d3f7b1bc", "name": "Saint Lucia 2001 parliamentary (overnight lc_2001_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Lucia", "year": 2001, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LC/LC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"uwp": "uwp", "slp": "slp", "na": "na", "staff": "staff", "free": "free", "ind-v1": "ind-v1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:29.344802", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f1f47b5062be4533bb8124d1445649f1", "name": "Saint Lucia 1997 parliamentary (overnight lc_1997_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Lucia", "year": 1997, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LC/LC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"uwp": "uwp", "slp": "slp", "ind-v1": "ind-v1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:29.197922", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ed026413b1d14d998076468ae872efde", "name": "Saint Lucia 1992 parliamentary (overnight lc_1992_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Lucia", "year": 1992, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LC/LC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"uwp": "uwp", "slp": "slp", "plp": "plp", "na": "na"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:29.049999", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6091df358d664c3389f14ea401ed2944", "name": "Saint Lucia 1987 parliamentary (overnight lc_1987_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Lucia", "year": 1987, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LC/LC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"uwp": "uwp", "slp": "slp", "plp": "plp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 36, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:28.857077", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 36}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b6130134948a4219b8f849dce9f467b7", "name": "Saint Lucia 1982 parliamentary (overnight lc_1982_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Lucia", "year": 1982, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LC/LC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"uwp": "uwp", "slp": "slp", "plp": "plp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 17, "registered_not_positive": 17}, "n_stations_flagged": 17, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:28.702471", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7ba82e5f710b402e8eca3bea7a41f4cb", "name": "Saint Lucia 1979 parliamentary (overnight lc_1979_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Lucia", "year": 1979, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LC/LC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"uwp": "uwp", "slp": "slp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 17, "registered_not_positive": 17}, "n_stations_flagged": 17, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:28.555536", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3a13dd1cef004ae697335809f66555ef", "name": "Saint Lucia 1974 parliamentary (overnight lc_1974_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Lucia", "year": 1974, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LC/LC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"uwp": "uwp", "slp": "slp", "ind-v1": "ind-v1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:28.419583", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ed4b88d71dbc4ff98442228ffc5138b5", "name": "Saint Lucia 1969 parliamentary (overnight lc_1969_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Lucia", "year": 1969, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LC/LC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"uwp": "uwp", "slp": "slp", "slpuf": "slpuf"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 10, "cast_gt_registered": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:28.305373", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a84ce989570146f9bd8d9b99bc066c48", "name": "Saint Lucia 1964 parliamentary (overnight lc_1964_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Lucia", "year": 1964, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LC/LC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"uwp": "uwp", "slp": "slp", "ind-v1": "ind-v1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:28.177346", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "105556337ef04275af03213f2d9efd40", "name": "Saint Lucia 1961 parliamentary (overnight lc_1961_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Lucia", "year": 1961, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LC/LC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"slp": "slp", "ppp": "ppp", "ind-v1": "ind-v1", "ind-v2": "ind-v2", "ind-v3": "ind-v3", "ind-v4": "ind-v4"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 10, "cast_gt_registered": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:28.046651", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a60c1a5bb7d94cbe9a69beb9caad5178", "name": "Saint Lucia 1957 parliamentary (overnight lc_1957_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Lucia", "year": 1957, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LC/LC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"slp": "slp", "ppp": "ppp", "ind-v1": "ind-v1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:27.911182", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2756e4b8b152488eb9333699960f18ee", "name": "Saint Lucia 1954 parliamentary (overnight lc_1954_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Lucia", "year": 1954, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LC/LC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"slp": "slp", "ppp": "ppp", "ind-v1": "ind-v1", "ind-v2": "ind-v2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:27.786983", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3d0a95a5a46945f399708015cc44234b", "name": "Saint Lucia 1951 parliamentary (overnight lc_1951_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Lucia", "year": 1951, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/LC/LC.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"slp": "slp", "ppp": "ppp", "ind-v1": "ind-v1", "ind-v2": "ind-v2", "ind-v3": "ind-v3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:27.662105", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fe8cd1c551ca404c9b6c32f9927b2a32", "name": "Kazakhstan 2012 parliamentary (overnight kz_2012_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Kazakhstan", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/KZ/KZ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"notan": "notan", "ppk": "ppk", "dpkaz": "dpkaz", "ansdp": "ansdp", "cppk": "cppk", "ksdp": "ksdp", "dp": "dp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 16, "granularity": "region", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 16, "registered_not_positive": 16}, "n_stations_flagged": 16, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:27.521309", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.338, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.067, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.232, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.113, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.338, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.067, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.969, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.492, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.427, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.107, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.123, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.263, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.186, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.232, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.232, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.113, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.113, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.176, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.176, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.513, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.513, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.095, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.095, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.34, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.34, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Nur Otan", "winner_candidate": "Nursultan Nazarbaev", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Kazakhstan Patriots Party", "margin": 93.61, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "KAZ", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 16}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bbc0657459244878b409a42d93cc453a", "name": "Cayman Islands 2005 parliamentary (overnight ky_2005_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cayman Islands", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/KY/KY.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pda1": "pda1", "pda2": "pda2", "pda3": "pda3", "pda4": "pda4", "ppm1": "ppm1", "ppm2": "ppm2", "ppm3": "ppm3", "ppm4": "ppm4", "udp1": "udp1", "udp2": "udp2", "udp3": "udp3", "udp4": "udp4", "wba1": "wba1", "wba2": "wba2", "wba3": "wba3", "wba4": "wba4", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:27.392618", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "79e2797a17d34784b2fade9da2f5dd7e", "name": "Saint Kitts and Nevis 2015 parliamentary (overnight kn_2015_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Kitts and Nevis", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/KN/KN.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"lp": "lp", "pam": "pam", "pelp": "pelp", "nrp": "nrp", "ccm": "ccm"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:27.223370", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 11}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d9eb7b02e20f49349416d6c07f41cfd2", "name": "Saint Kitts and Nevis 2010 parliamentary (overnight kn_2010_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Kitts and Nevis", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/KN/KN.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"lp": "lp", "pam": "pam", "nrp": "nrp", "ccm": "ccm", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:27.081753", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 11}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ccdfb0e64aa44c50b0a2f59e84ef510c", "name": "Saint Kitts and Nevis 2004 parliamentary (overnight kn_2004_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Kitts and Nevis", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/KN/KN.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"lp": "lp", "pam": "pam", "nrp": "nrp", "ccm": "ccm", "unep": "unep", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:26.939774", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 11}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2b188bfda0414b0caefcece2d6b56a0e", "name": "Saint Kitts and Nevis 2000 parliamentary (overnight kn_2000_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Kitts and Nevis", "year": 2000, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/KN/KN.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"lp": "lp", "pam": "pam", "nrp": "nrp", "ccm": "ccm"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:26.803019", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 11}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "db50e3027ca94f7496f84fbf4a42acf5", "name": "Saint Kitts and Nevis 1995 parliamentary (overnight kn_1995_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Kitts and Nevis", "year": 1995, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/KN/KN.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"lp": "lp", "pam": "pam", "nrp": "nrp", "ccm": "ccm", "upp": "upp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:26.675660", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 11}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ef427b09b63b4a60bb8f614f3b02b2d9", "name": "Saint Kitts and Nevis 1993 parliamentary (overnight kn_1993_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Kitts and Nevis", "year": 1993, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/KN/KN.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"lp": "lp", "pam": "pam", "nrp": "nrp", "ccm": "ccm", "upp": "upp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:26.537346", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 11}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "517648226d10479e9338f813664b3966", "name": "Saint Kitts and Nevis 1989 parliamentary (overnight kn_1989_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Kitts and Nevis", "year": 1989, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/KN/KN.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"lp": "lp", "pam": "pam", "nrp": "nrp", "ccm": "ccm", "wkmb": "wkmb", "prlp": "prlp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:26.402622", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 11}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5a24f1e74a7a4c3eb556e0894f2a96f1", "name": "Saint Kitts and Nevis 1984 parliamentary (overnight kn_1984_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Kitts and Nevis", "year": 1984, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/KN/KN.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"lp": "lp", "pam": "pam", "nrp": "nrp", "wkmb": "wkmb", "prlp": "prlp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:26.274687", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "08250bf551b44735a4b846ab23f7f398", "name": "Saint Kitts and Nevis 1980 parliamentary (overnight kn_1980_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Kitts and Nevis", "year": 1980, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/KN/KN.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"lp": "lp", "nrp": "nrp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 9, "registered_not_positive": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:26.154742", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e419e4e8c4694a3bbdd02c8e39287f94", "name": "Saint Kitts and Nevis 1975 parliamentary (overnight kn_1975_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Kitts and Nevis", "year": 1975, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/KN/KN.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"lp": "lp", "nrp": "nrp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 10, "cast_gt_registered": 9}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:26.031465", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1ca34d942f9442c5a6acabcdcd22654f", "name": "Saint Kitts and Nevis 1971 parliamentary (overnight kn_1971_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Kitts and Nevis", "year": 1971, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/KN/KN.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"lp": "lp", "pam": "pam", "nrp": "nrp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 9, "registered_not_positive": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:25.909024", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c49323bb12514914897c480876e45052", "name": "Saint Kitts and Nevis 1966 parliamentary (overnight kn_1966_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Kitts and Nevis", "year": 1966, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/KN/KN.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"lp": "lp", "pam": "pam", "unm": "unm", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 10, "cast_gt_registered": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:25.779533", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d64fd5d9fc10408dbc87437ea0a8c090", "name": "Saint Kitts and Nevis 1961 parliamentary (overnight kn_1961_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Kitts and Nevis", "year": 1961, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/KN/KN.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"lp": "lp", "ppm": "ppm", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 10, "cast_gt_registered": 9}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:25.641271", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "24b1c88904764c3d9b9352aea2afc6e6", "name": "Saint Kitts and Nevis 1957 parliamentary (overnight kn_1957_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Kitts and Nevis", "year": 1957, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/KN/KN.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"dp": "dp", "npp": "npp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 7, "registered_not_positive": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:25.515238", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e581ffeffa5745b6982009355d0a30a0", "name": "Saint Kitts and Nevis 1952 parliamentary (overnight kn_1952_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Kitts and Nevis", "year": 1952, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/KN/KN.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"wl1": "wl1", "wl2": "wl2", "d1": "d1", "d2": "d2", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 7, "registered_not_positive": 7}, "n_stations_flagged": 7, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:25.395272", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4452a801363c4883b68faefcdac05907", "name": "Comoros 2015 parliamentary (overnight km_2015_parliamentary_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Comoros", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/KM/KM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"crc": "crc", "juwa": "juwa", "orange": "orange", "pec": "pec", "radhi": "radhi", "rdc": "rdc", "updc": "updc", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 23, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:25.209331", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.306, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.266, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.395, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.24, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.306, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.327, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.807, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.797, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.199, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.261, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.315, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.84, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.46, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.329, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.24, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.24, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.278, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.278, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.659, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.352, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.352, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.7, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Convention for the Renewal of the Comoros (CRC)", "winner_candidate": "Azali Assoumani", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Union for the Development of the Comoros (UPDC)", "margin": 1.77, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "COM", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 23}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1d86facf4fc64debb374b81c6e186265", "name": "Comoros 2015 parliamentary (overnight km_2015_parliamentary_r1.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Comoros", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/KM/KM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"anc": "anc", "basse": "basse", "chuma": "chuma", "crc": "crc", "djawabu": "djawabu", "fd": "fd", "juwa": "juwa", "mcjc": "mcjc", "mouroua": "mouroua", "mwash": "mwash", "orange": "orange", "pec": "pec", "psdc-d": "psdc-d", "radhi": "radhi", "rdc": "rdc", "rdr": "rdr", "ridja": "ridja", "rndr": "rndr", "udzima": "udzima", "undc": "undc", "updc": "updc", "www": "www", "ind": "ind", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5", "ind6": "ind6"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 23, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:25.020940", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.306, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.266, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.395, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.24, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.306, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.327, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.807, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.797, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.199, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.261, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.315, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.84, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.46, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.329, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.24, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.24, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.278, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.278, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.659, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.352, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.352, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.7, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Convention for the Renewal of the Comoros (CRC)", "winner_candidate": "Azali Assoumani", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Union for the Development of the Comoros (UPDC)", "margin": 1.77, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "COM", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 23}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e6ad413d3f5d4e2d8491de96a25080b0", "name": "Jamaica 2011 parliamentary (overnight jm_2011_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Jamaica", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/JM/JM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"jlp": "jlp", "ndm": "ndm", "pnp": "pnp", "mgppp": "mgppp", "jam": "jam", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 63, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:24.631734", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.784, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.788, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.767, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.651, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.788, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.981, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.338, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.511, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.651, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.583, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.583, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.888, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.169, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.169, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 63}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "544e6aa6e8754b58abac5847a44575aa", "name": "Jamaica 2007 parliamentary (overnight jm_2007_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Jamaica", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/JM/JM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"jlp": "jlp", "ndm": "ndm", "pnp": "pnp", "ind1": "ind1", "iewfipp": "iewfipp", "jbf": "jbf"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 60, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 60, "registered_not_positive": 60}, "n_stations_flagged": 60, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:24.325797", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.785, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.783, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.762, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.644, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.785, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.519, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.375, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.594, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.495, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.511, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.644, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.644, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.58, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.58, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.169, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.169, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 60}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0b64429caae24d16bc9741d469891c51", "name": "Jamaica 2002 parliamentary (overnight jm_2002_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Jamaica", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/JM/JM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"jlp": "jlp", "pnp": "pnp", "ind1": "ind1", "iewfipp": "iewfipp", "nja": "nja", "upp": "upp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 60, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 60, "cast_gt_registered": 60}, "n_stations_flagged": 60, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:24.043152", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.514, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.832, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.695, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.566, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.514, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.465, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.449, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.075, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.416, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.299, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.575, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.566, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.566, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.521, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.169, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.169, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 60}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9024e6a573c7416089fef2e6215d04cb", "name": "Jamaica 1997 parliamentary (overnight jm_1997_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Jamaica", "year": 1997, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/JM/JM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"jlp": "jlp", "ndm": "ndm", "pnp": "pnp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 60, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 60, "cast_gt_registered": 60}, "n_stations_flagged": 60, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:23.749313", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.827, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.781, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.642, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.499, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.827, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.707, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.096, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.987, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.747, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.459, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.642, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.642, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.499, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.499, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.169, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.169, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 60}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "47e145f93eda41a38e6e0faeb3b033e6", "name": "Jamaica 1993 parliamentary (overnight jm_1993_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Jamaica", "year": 1993, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/JM/JM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"jlp": "jlp", "pnp": "pnp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 60, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 60, "cast_gt_registered": 60}, "n_stations_flagged": 60, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:23.489821", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.83, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.782, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.608, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.473, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.349, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.12, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.53, "year": 1993, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.672, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 1993, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.475, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 1993, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.608, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.608, "year": 1993, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.473, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.473, "year": 1993, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.455, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 1993, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.169, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.169, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 60}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "38bf10668d2744f7835c477d5f22a02a", "name": "Jamaica 1989 parliamentary (overnight jm_1989_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Jamaica", "year": 1989, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/JM/JM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"jlp": "jlp", "pnp": "pnp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 60, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 60, "registered_not_positive": 60}, "n_stations_flagged": 60, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:23.173095", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.845, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.789, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.56, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.431, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 1989, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.789, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 1989, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.731, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.433, "year": 1989, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 1989, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.672, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 1989, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.129, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.532, "year": 1989, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.56, "year": 1989, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.431, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 1989, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.424, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 1989, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.191, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.191, "year": 1989, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.809, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 1989, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 60}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ba76c6855b624a598896bb9e686a6f0f", "name": "Jamaica 1983 parliamentary (overnight jm_1983_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Jamaica", "year": 1983, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/JM/JM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ccm": "ccm", "jlp": "jlp", "juf": "juf", "rp": "rp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 6, "registered_not_positive": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:23.032088", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.844, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.774, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.475, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.372, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.146, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.286, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.62, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 1983, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.672, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 1983, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.109, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 1983, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.475, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.475, "year": 1983, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.372, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 1983, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 1983, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.191, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.191, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.809, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fb06d2dc8fc04ea2a52b94d6eee52e4f", "name": "Jamaica 1980 parliamentary (overnight jm_1980_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Jamaica", "year": 1980, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/JM/JM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"jlp": "jlp", "pnp": "pnp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 60, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 60, "registered_not_positive": 60}, "n_stations_flagged": 60, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:22.731405", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.73, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.361, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.499, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.389, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 1980, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.361, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.626, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 1980, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.398, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.1, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.62, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 1980, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.672, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 1980, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.102, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 1980, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.499, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.499, "year": 1980, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.389, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.389, "year": 1980, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.383, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.383, "year": 1980, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.823, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.191, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.191, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 60}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "640fea7525e64f10ac27d93ab4d99908", "name": "Jamaica 1976 parliamentary (overnight jm_1976_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Jamaica", "year": 1976, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/JM/JM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"jlp": "jlp", "pnp": "pnp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 60, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 60, "registered_not_positive": 60}, "n_stations_flagged": 60, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:22.404013", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.753, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.745, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.511, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.397, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.753, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.745, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.635, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.378, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.344, "year": 1976, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.246, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.311, "year": 1976, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.483, "year": 1976, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.511, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.511, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.397, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.397, "year": 1976, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.39, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.39, "year": 1976, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.807, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.191, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.191, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.754, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 60}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d2d1789fd9d24f758a54fdb3c521daed", "name": "Jamaica 1972 parliamentary (overnight jm_1972_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Jamaica", "year": 1972, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/JM/JM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cdp": "cdp", "jlp": "jlp", "pnp": "pnp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 53, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 53, "cast_gt_registered": 53}, "n_stations_flagged": 53, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:22.118037", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.418, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.752, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.52, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.395, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 1972, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.789, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.697, "year": 1972, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.991, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.498, "year": 1972, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.246, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.311, "year": 1972, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.704, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 1972, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.478, "year": 1972, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.52, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.52, "year": 1972, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 1972, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.35, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.35, "year": 1972, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.191, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.191, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.78, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 53}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "39e41f06ce534cdfbe5fc095ff42a2e1", "name": "Jamaica 1967 parliamentary (overnight jm_1967_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Jamaica", "year": 1967, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/JM/JM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"jwp": "jwp", "jlp": "jlp", "jup": "jup", "pnp": "pnp", "rep": "rep", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 53, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 53, "registered_not_positive": 53}, "n_stations_flagged": 53, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:21.849325", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.389, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.752, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.515, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.383, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.389, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 1967, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 1967, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 1967, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 1967, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.246, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.311, "year": 1967, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 1967, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 1967, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.515, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.515, "year": 1967, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.383, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.383, "year": 1967, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.328, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 1967, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 1967, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 1967, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.191, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.191, "year": 1967, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.77, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 1967, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 53}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4fc03ae4474a4f5f9e3321405bc830c5", "name": "Jamaica 1962 parliamentary (overnight jm_1962_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Jamaica", "year": 1962, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/JM/JM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"jlp": "jlp", "pnp": "pnp", "ppp": "ppp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 45, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 45, "cast_gt_registered": 45}, "n_stations_flagged": 45, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:21.595313", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.408, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.754, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.543, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.403, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.408, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 1962, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.806, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 1962, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.238, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 1962, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.246, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.311, "year": 1962, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 1962, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.075, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.519, "year": 1962, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.543, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 1962, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.403, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 1962, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.336, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.336, "year": 1962, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 1962, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.189, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.189, "year": 1962, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.797, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 1962, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 45}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "66f22ba1deda4614a3185d9017cf4605", "name": "Jamaica 1955 parliamentary (overnight jm_1955_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Jamaica", "year": 1955, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/JM/JM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"fp": "fp", "jlp": "jlp", "nlp": "nlp", "pfm": "pfm", "pnp": "pnp", "rp": "rp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 32, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 32, "cast_gt_registered": 32}, "n_stations_flagged": 32, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:21.385749", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.18, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.785, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.494, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.345, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.18, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 1955, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.785, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1955, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.369, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 1955, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.213, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 1955, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.992, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.248, "year": 1955, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 1955, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.567, "year": 1955, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.494, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.494, "year": 1955, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.345, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.345, "year": 1955, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.262, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.262, "year": 1955, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1955, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.785, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 1955, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.158, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.158, "year": 1955, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 1955, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 32}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "04491e74a871428a80d8f6c4cd89a4d3", "name": "Jamaica 1949 parliamentary (overnight jm_1949_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Jamaica", "year": 1949, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/JM/JM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"aip": "aip", "lab1": "lab1", "lab2": "lab2", "pnp": "pnp", "upj": "upj", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 32, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 32, "cast_gt_registered": 32}, "n_stations_flagged": 32, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:21.186211", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.402, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.782, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.314, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.235, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.402, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.35, "year": 1949, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.8, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 1949, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.054, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.513, "year": 1949, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.992, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.248, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 1949, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.773, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 1949, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.314, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.314, "year": 1949, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.235, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.235, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.182, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.182, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 1949, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.77, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 1949, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.176, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.176, "year": 1949, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.696, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 1949, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 32}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bf474912e54e4b9eb21ba4e0915dce8b", "name": "Jamaica 1944 parliamentary (overnight jm_1944_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Jamaica", "year": 1944, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/JM/JM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"jdp": "jdp", "lab1": "lab1", "pnp": "pnp", "oth1": "oth1", "oth2": "oth2", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 32, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 32, "cast_gt_registered": 32}, "n_stations_flagged": 32, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:48:20.962682", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.17, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.786, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.289, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.219, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.17, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.542, "year": 1944, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1944, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.79, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.698, "year": 1944, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.409, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 1944, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.992, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.248, "year": 1944, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 1944, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1944, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.289, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 1944, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 1944, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.16, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.16, "year": 1944, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.657, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.657, "year": 1944, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.77, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 1944, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.176, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.176, "year": 1944, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 1944, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 32}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5b10abad78344e5cabe6b8fb78275d97", "name": "Israel 2022 parliamentary (overnight israel_2022_knesset25.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Israel", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.il/api/3/action/datastore_search?resource_id=cc223336-07bc-485d-b160-62df92967c0a", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Israeli Labor Party": "Israeli Labor Party", "Economic Freedom": "Economic Freedom", "The Jewish Home": "The Jewish Home", "United Torah Judaism": "United Torah Judaism", "Balad": "Balad", "Hadash\u2013Ta'al": "Hadash\u2013Ta'al", "\u05d6": "\u05d6", "\u05d6\u05da": "\u05d6\u05da", "\u05d6\u05e0": "\u05d6\u05e0", "\u05d6\u05e5": "\u05d6\u05e5", "Religious Zionism-Otzma Yehudit": "Religious Zionism-Otzma Yehudit", "Free Democratic Israel": "Free Democratic Israel", "New Economic Party": "New Economic Party", "\u05d9\u05e0": "\u05d9\u05e0", "\u05d9\u05e5": "\u05d9\u05e5", "\u05d9\u05e7": "\u05d9\u05e7", "National Unity": "National Unity", "Me and You": "Me and You", "Yisrael Beiteinu": "Yisrael Beiteinu", "Likud": "Likud", "Meretz": "Meretz", "\u05e0\u05d6": "\u05e0\u05d6", "Nativ": "Nativ", "\u05e0\u05e3": "\u05e0\u05e3", "The New Independents": "The New Independents", "There's a Direction": "There's a Direction", "\u05e0\u05e8": "\u05e0\u05e8", "United Arab List": "United Arab List", "Yesh Atid": "Yesh Atid", "Pirate Party": "Pirate Party", "Fiery Youth": "Fiery Youth", "Social Leadership": "Social Leadership", "Voice of the Environment and the Living": "Voice of the Environment and the Living", "\u05e7\u05d9": "\u05e7\u05d9", "New Order": "New Order", "Every Vote Counts": "Every Vote Counts", "With Courage for You": "With Courage for You", "30/40": "30/40", "Shas": "Shas", "Ale Yarok\u2013Islamic Family": "Ale Yarok\u2013Islamic Family"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12545, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 838, "cast_gt_registered": 838}, "n_stations_flagged": 838, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:47:37.806967", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.928, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.714, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.64, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.28, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.306, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.64, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.64, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.571, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.105, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.105, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 12545}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "aafb793010ba482798fc718cc7886818", "name": "Israel 2021 parliamentary (overnight israel_2021_knesset24.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Israel", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.il/api/3/action/datastore_search?resource_id=419be3b0-fd30-455a-afc0-034ec36be990", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Israeli Labor Party": "Israeli Labor Party", "Yamina": "Yamina", "United Torah Judaism": "United Torah Judaism", "Joint List": "Joint List", "\u05d6": "\u05d6", "Tzomet": "Tzomet", "Religious Zionist Party": "Religious Zionist Party", "Social Bang \u2013 Pensioners": "Social Bang \u2013 Pensioners", "New Economic Party": "New Economic Party", "\u05d9\u05e0": "\u05d9\u05e0", "\u05d9\u05e3": "\u05d9\u05e3", "\u05d9\u05e7": "\u05d9\u05e7", "\u05d9\u05e8": "\u05d9\u05e8", "\u05db": "\u05db", "Me and You": "Me and You", "Blue and White": "Blue and White", "Yisrael Beiteinu": "Yisrael Beiteinu", "Likud": "Likud", "Meretz": "Meretz", "\u05e0": "\u05e0", "\u05e0\u05d9": "\u05e0\u05d9", "\u05e0\u05e8": "\u05e0\u05e8", "United Arab List": "United Arab List", "Yesh Atid": "Yesh Atid", "Pirate Party": "Pirate Party", "\u05e6\u05d9": "\u05e6\u05d9", "\u05e6\u05db": "\u05e6\u05db", "\u05e6\u05e3": "\u05e6\u05e3", "\u05e5": "\u05e5", "\u05e7": "\u05e7", "\u05e7\u05d9": "\u05e7\u05d9", "New Order": "New Order", "Mishpat Tzedek": "Mishpat Tzedek", "Rapeh only Health": "Rapeh only Health", "Hope for Change": "Hope for Change", "Am Shalem": "Am Shalem", "\u05e8\u05e7": "\u05e8\u05e7", "Shas": "Shas", "New Hope": "New Hope"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12926, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 799, "cast_gt_registered": 799}, "n_stations_flagged": 799, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:46:47.055600", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.809, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.634, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.722, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.639, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.28, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.278, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.1, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.1, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 12926}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4cd659a26b0a4ef1bebe4f19b8eac284", "name": "Israel 2020 parliamentary (overnight israel_2020_knesset23.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Israel", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.il/api/3/action/datastore_search?resource_id=3b9e911a-2e90-4587-b209-84171664056b", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Labor-Gesher-Meretz": "Labor-Gesher-Meretz", "United Torah Judaism": "United Torah Judaism", "Joint List": "Joint List", "Liberal\u2013Economic Power": "Liberal\u2013Economic Power", "\u05e4\u05e2\u05d5\u05dc\u05d4 \u05dc\u05d9\u05e9\u05e8\u05d0\u05dc": "\u05e4\u05e2\u05d5\u05dc\u05d4 \u05dc\u05d9\u05e9\u05e8\u05d0\u05dc", "\u05d6\u05e5": "\u05d6\u05e5", "Yamina": "Yamina", "\u05d4\u05d7\u05d6\u05d5\u05df \u05d1\u05e8\u05d0\u05e9\u05d5\u05ea \u05e6\u05d9\u05d5\u05df \u05d0\u05dc\u05d5\u05df": "\u05d4\u05d7\u05d6\u05d5\u05df \u05d1\u05e8\u05d0\u05e9\u05d5\u05ea \u05e6\u05d9\u05d5\u05df \u05d0\u05dc\u05d5\u05df", "\u05d0\u05d3\u05d5\u05dd \u05dc\u05d1\u05df - \u05d7'\u05d9\u05e8\u05d1\u05ea \u05d3\u05d5\u05e8\u05d0\u05df \u05d1\u05e8\u05d0\u05e9\u05d5\u05ea \u05e2\u05de\u05d9 \u05e4\u05d9\u05e0\u05e9\u05d8\u05d9\u05d9\u05df \u05de\u05d7\u05db\u05d9\u05dd \u05dc\u05de\u05e9\u05d9\u05d7? \u05de\u05e9\u05d9": "\u05d0\u05d3\u05d5\u05dd \u05dc\u05d1\u05df - \u05d7'\u05d9\u05e8\u05d1\u05ea \u05d3\u05d5\u05e8\u05d0\u05df \u05d1\u05e8\u05d0\u05e9\u05d5\u05ea \u05e2\u05de\u05d9 \u05e4\u05d9\u05e0\u05e9\u05d8\u05d9\u05d9\u05df \u05de\u05d7\u05db\u05d9\u05dd \u05dc\u05de\u05e9\u05d9\u05d7? \u05de\u05e9\u05d9", "Ihud HaBrit VeHaShutafut": "Ihud HaBrit VeHaShutafut", "\u05db\u05d1\u05d5\u05d3 \u05d4\u05d0\u05d3\u05dd, \u05d1\u05e8\u05d0\u05e9\u05d5\u05ea \u05e2\u05d5\"\u05d3 \u05d0\u05e8\u05e7\u05d3\u05d9 \u05e4\u05d5\u05d2\u05e5'": "\u05db\u05d1\u05d5\u05d3 \u05d4\u05d0\u05d3\u05dd, \u05d1\u05e8\u05d0\u05e9\u05d5\u05ea \u05e2\u05d5\"\u05d3 \u05d0\u05e8\u05e7\u05d3\u05d9 \u05e4\u05d5\u05d2\u05e5'", "\u05de\u05e4\u05dc\u05d2\u05ea \u05d4\u05d2\u05d5\u05e9 \u05d4\u05ea\u05e0\"\u05db\u05d9": "\u05de\u05e4\u05dc\u05d2\u05ea \u05d4\u05d2\u05d5\u05e9 \u05d4\u05ea\u05e0\"\u05db\u05d9", "\u05de\u05e0\u05d4\u05d9\u05d2\u05d5\u05ea \u05d7\u05d1\u05e8\u05ea\u05d9\u05ea": "\u05de\u05e0\u05d4\u05d9\u05d2\u05d5\u05ea \u05d7\u05d1\u05e8\u05ea\u05d9\u05ea", "Jewish Heart": "Jewish Heart", "Me and You": "Me and You", "Yisrael Beiteinu": "Yisrael Beiteinu", "Likud": "Likud", "Women's Voice": "Women's Voice", "Koah Lehashpi'a": "Koah Lehashpi'a", "\u05e7\u05de\"\u05d4 - \u05e7\u05d9\u05d3\u05d5\u05dd \u05de\u05e2\u05de\u05d3 \u05d4\u05e4\u05e8\u05d8": "\u05e7\u05de\"\u05d4 - \u05e7\u05d9\u05d3\u05d5\u05dd \u05de\u05e2\u05de\u05d3 \u05d4\u05e4\u05e8\u05d8", "Otzma Yehudit": "Otzma Yehudit", "Mitkademet": "Mitkademet", "Blue and White": "Blue and White", "The Pirates \u2013 For Democracy Click Here": "The Pirates \u2013 For Democracy Click Here", "Da'am\u2013Green Economy\u2013One Nation": "Da'am\u2013Green Economy\u2013One Nation", "Israelist \u2013 Our Rights in Our Vote": "Israelist \u2013 Our Rights in Our Vote", "\u05e9\u05de\u05e2 \u05d1\u05e8\u05d0\u05e9\u05d5\u05ea \u05e0\u05e4\u05ea\u05dc\u05d9 \u05d2\u05d5\u05dc\u05d3\u05de\u05df": "\u05e9\u05de\u05e2 \u05d1\u05e8\u05d0\u05e9\u05d5\u05ea \u05e0\u05e4\u05ea\u05dc\u05d9 \u05d2\u05d5\u05dc\u05d3\u05de\u05df", "New Order": "New Order", "Mishpat Tzedek": "Mishpat Tzedek", "Shas": "Shas"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11179, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 548, "registered_not_positive": 548}, "n_stations_flagged": 548, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:46:07.604483", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.81, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.936, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.723, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.639, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.186, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.28, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.389, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.109, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.109, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 11179}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dda7bf9eb4054763acdca44afd8b4ce9", "name": "Israel 2019 parliamentary (overnight israel_2019sep_knesset22.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Israel", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.il/api/3/action/datastore_search?resource_id=22f3a195-3a79-436c-be23-cb606bc7b398", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Labor\u2013Gesher": "Labor\u2013Gesher", "United Torah Judaism": "United Torah Judaism", "Joint List": "Joint List", "Economic Power": "Economic Power", "Democracy Party": "Democracy Party", "\u05d6\u05df": "\u05d6\u05df", "Tzomet": "Tzomet", "Yamina": "Yamina", "\u05d9": "\u05d9", "Red and White": "Red and White", "Liberal Christian Movement": "Liberal Christian Movement", "Human Dignity": "Human Dignity", "\u05d9\u05e7": "\u05d9\u05e7", "\u05db": "\u05db", "Popular Unity": "Popular Unity", "Otzma Yehudit": "Otzma Yehudit", "Yisrael Beiteinu": "Yisrael Beiteinu", "Likud": "Likud", "Democratic Union": "Democratic Union", "Liberal Democratic Progressive Party": "Liberal Democratic Progressive Party", "Respect and Equality": "Respect and Equality", "\u05e0\u05e5": "\u05e0\u05e5", "Blue and White": "Blue and White", "Pirate Party": "Pirate Party", "Justice": "Justice", "North": "North", "Da'am Workers Party": "Da'am Workers Party", "Our Rights In Our Vote": "Our Rights In Our Vote", "New Order": "New Order", "Kama": "Kama", "Secular Right": "Secular Right", "Shas": "Shas"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10901, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 362, "cast_gt_registered": 364}, "n_stations_flagged": 364, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:45:29.223820", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.429, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.936, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.708, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.623, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.429, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.544, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.626, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.28, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.389, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.623, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.562, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.124, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.124, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10901}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2b0e85a60e2749c689eb0d145a1c7b4a", "name": "Israel 2019 parliamentary (overnight israel_2019apr_knesset21.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Israel", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.il/api/3/action/datastore_search?resource_id=f79f9ba5-fe12-4b90-96cc-916f1b7c1c34", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Labor Party": "Labor Party", "United Torah Judaism": "United Torah Judaism", "United Arab List\u2013Balad": "United Arab List\u2013Balad", "Hadash\u2013Ta'al": "Hadash\u2013Ta'al", "Zehut": "Zehut", "Veteran Civil": "Veteran Civil", "\u05d6\u05da": "\u05d6\u05da", "\u05d6\u05e0": "\u05d6\u05e0", "Tzomet": "Tzomet", "Union of Right-Wing Parties": "Union of Right-Wing Parties", "Yashar": "Yashar", "\u05d9\u05d6": "\u05d9\u05d6", "\u05d9\u05df": "\u05d9\u05df", "\u05d9\u05e5": "\u05d9\u05e5", "Kulanu": "Kulanu", "Hope for Change": "Hope for Change", "Yisrael Beiteinu": "Yisrael Beiteinu", "Likud": "Likud", "Meretz": "Meretz", "New Right": "New Right", "Zekhuyotenu BeKoleinu": "Zekhuyotenu BeKoleinu", "\u05e0\u05da": "\u05e0\u05da", "Shield of Israel": "Shield of Israel", "Gesher": "Gesher", "Social Security": "Social Security", "\u05df\u05da": "\u05df\u05da", "\u05df\u05e0": "\u05df\u05e0", "Blue and White": "Blue and White", "Pirate Party": "Pirate Party", "Pashut Ahava": "Pashut Ahava", "Education": "Education", "\u05e3\u05e0": "\u05e3\u05e0", "We are all friends Na Nach": "We are all friends Na Nach", "Social Justice": "Social Justice", "Green Economy \u2013 One Nation": "Green Economy \u2013 One Nation", "\u05e5\u05d6": "\u05e5\u05d6", "\u05e5\u05d9": "\u05e5\u05d9", "Justice for All": "Justice for All", "Eretz Yisrael Shelanu": "Eretz Yisrael Shelanu", "MeHathala": "MeHathala", "Kol Yisrael Ahim": "Kol Yisrael Ahim", "The Arab List (Mada\u2013ANP)": "The Arab List (Mada\u2013ANP)", "Shas": "Shas"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10765, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 305, "cast_gt_registered": 305}, "n_stations_flagged": 305, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:44:52.078955", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.429, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.936, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.708, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.623, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.429, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.544, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.626, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.28, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.389, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.623, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.562, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.124, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.124, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10765}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "54ae90f42ed24a679f83057322d84e8c", "name": "Israel 2015 parliamentary (overnight israel_2015_knesset20.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Israel", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.il/api/3/action/datastore_search?resource_id=c3db5581-f48d-45fc-b221-e7635e940c41", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Zionist Union": "Zionist Union", "United Torah Judaism": "United Torah Judaism", "Joint List": "Joint List", "\u05de\u05e4\u05dc\u05d2\u05ea \u05db\u05dc\u05db\u05dc\u05d4 \u05d1\u05e8\u05d0\u05e9\u05d5\u05ea \u05d4\u05d0\u05d7\u05d9\u05dd \u05d2\u05d5\u05dc\u05d3\u05e9\u05d8\u05d9\u05d9\u05df": "\u05de\u05e4\u05dc\u05d2\u05ea \u05db\u05dc\u05db\u05dc\u05d4 \u05d1\u05e8\u05d0\u05e9\u05d5\u05ea \u05d4\u05d0\u05d7\u05d9\u05dd \u05d2\u05d5\u05dc\u05d3\u05e9\u05d8\u05d9\u05d9\u05df", "\u05ea\u05d5\u05de\u05db\u05d9 \u05de\u05e4\u05dc\u05d2\u05ea \u05d4\u05d3\u05de\u05d5\u05e7\u05e8\u05d0\u05d8\u05d5\u05e8\u05d4": "\u05ea\u05d5\u05de\u05db\u05d9 \u05de\u05e4\u05dc\u05d2\u05ea \u05d4\u05d3\u05de\u05d5\u05e7\u05e8\u05d0\u05d8\u05d5\u05e8\u05d4", "Brit Olam": "Brit Olam", "The Jewish Home": "The Jewish Home", "\u05e9\u05db\u05d9\u05e8\u05d5\u05ea \u05d1\u05db\u05d1\u05d5\u05d3": "\u05e9\u05db\u05d9\u05e8\u05d5\u05ea \u05d1\u05db\u05d1\u05d5\u05d3", "\u05de\u05e0\u05d4\u05d9\u05d2\u05d5\u05ea \u05d7\u05d1\u05e8\u05ea\u05d9\u05ea": "\u05de\u05e0\u05d4\u05d9\u05d2\u05d5\u05ea \u05d7\u05d1\u05e8\u05ea\u05d9\u05ea", "\u05d9\u05da": "\u05d9\u05da", "Hope for Change": "Hope for Change", "Kulanu": "Kulanu", "Yisrael Beiteinu": "Yisrael Beiteinu", "Likud": "Likud", "Meretz": "Meretz", "U'Bizchutan": "U'Bizchutan", "Or": "Or", "Flower Party": "Flower Party", "Arab List (Mada\u2013Arab National Party)": "Arab List (Mada\u2013Arab National Party)", "Yesh Atid": "Yesh Atid", "Pirate Party": "Pirate Party", "We Are All Friends\u00a0Na Nach": "We Are All Friends\u00a0Na Nach", "Ale Yarok": "Ale Yarok", "Yachad": "Yachad", "The Greens": "The Greens", "Shas": "Shas"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10414, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 295, "cast_gt_registered": 295}, "n_stations_flagged": 295, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:44:16.568429", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.784, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.839, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.733, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.654, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.839, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.8, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.312, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.554, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.28, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.407, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.654, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.596, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.596, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.107, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.107, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10414}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "27abfb59a0c54976ac0796db1c209586", "name": "Israel 2013 parliamentary (overnight israel_2013_knesset19.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Israel", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.il/api/3/action/datastore_search?resource_id=432d3185-545a-41d9-8c72-d10ee515919c", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Labor Party": "Labor Party", "United Torah Judaism": "United Torah Judaism", "Balad": "Balad", "\u05de\u05d5\u05e8\u05e9\u05ea \u05d0\u05d1\u05d5\u05ea": "\u05de\u05d5\u05e8\u05e9\u05ea \u05d0\u05d1\u05d5\u05ea", "Living with Dignity": "Living with Dignity", "Hope for Change": "Hope for Change", "Hadash": "Hadash", "Eretz Hadasha": "Eretz Hadasha", "\u05d6\u05d4": "\u05d6\u05d4", "Dor": "Dor", "The Jewish Home": "The Jewish Home", "HaYisraelim": "HaYisraelim", "Kadima": "Kadima", "Likud Yisrael Beiteinu": "Likud Yisrael Beiteinu", "Meretz": "Meretz", "Brit Olam": "Brit Olam", "Or": "Or", "Otzma LeYisrael": "Otzma LeYisrael", "Leader": "Leader", "United Arab List": "United Arab List", "Pirate Party": "Pirate Party", "Yesh Atid": "Yesh Atid", "Koah Lehashpi'a": "Koah Lehashpi'a", "Finance Party": "Finance Party", "\u05e0\u05e6\u05d7 \u05d1\u05e0\u05d9 \u05ea\u05d5\u05e8\u05d4": "\u05e0\u05e6\u05d7 \u05d1\u05e0\u05d9 \u05ea\u05d5\u05e8\u05d4", "We are Brothers": "We are Brothers", "We are all Friends": "We are all Friends", "Am Shalem": "Am Shalem", "Hatnua": "Hatnua", "Social Justice": "Social Justice", "Da'am Workers Party": "Da'am Workers Party", "Ale Yarok\u2013The Liberal List": "Ale Yarok\u2013The Liberal List", "The Greens and the Youth": "The Greens and the Youth", "Shas": "Shas"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10109, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 228, "registered_not_positive": 228}, "n_stations_flagged": 228, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:43:41.774325", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.772, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.828, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.734, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.655, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.828, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.791, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.308, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.554, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.28, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.359, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.655, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.598, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.107, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.107, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10109}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ae9684cc001d492986cc15b2c45f8d03", "name": "Israel 2009 parliamentary (overnight israel_2009_knesset18.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Israel", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.il/api/3/action/datastore_search?resource_id=840edb33-90ac-4176-8ad9-4cdcb8e5caa5", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Labor Party": "Labor Party", "Or": "Or", "The Jewish Home": "The Jewish Home", "United Torah Judaism": "United Torah Judaism", "Balad": "Balad", "The Green Movement\u2013Meimad": "The Green Movement\u2013Meimad", "Hadash": "Hadash", "Gil": "Gil", "Yisrael Hazaka": "Yisrael Hazaka", "National Union": "National Union", "HaYisraelim": "HaYisraelim", "Lev LaOlim": "Lev LaOlim", "Holocaust Survivors and Grown-Up Green Leaf Party": "Holocaust Survivors and Grown-Up Green Leaf Party", "Kadima": "Kadima", "Yisrael Beiteinu": "Yisrael Beiteinu", "Likud": "Likud", "New Movement-Meretz": "New Movement-Meretz", "Yisrael HaMithadeshet": "Yisrael HaMithadeshet", "Ahrayut": "Ahrayut", "Lazuz": "Lazuz", "Lehem": "Lehem", "United Arab List\u2013Ta'al": "United Arab List\u2013Ta'al", "Koah LeHashpi'a": "Koah LeHashpi'a", "\u05e4\u05d7": "\u05e4\u05d7", "Brit Olam": "Brit Olam", "Man's Rights in the Family Party": "Man's Rights in the Family Party", "Tzomet": "Tzomet", "Tzabar": "Tzabar", "Da'am Workers Party": "Da'am Workers Party", "Ale Yarok": "Ale Yarok", "Koah HaKesef": "Koah HaKesef", "Leader": "Leader", "The Greens": "The Greens", "Shas": "Shas"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 9264, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:43:11.362525", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.844, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.756, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.68, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.364, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.554, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.466, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.477, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.68, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.621, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.901, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.104, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.104, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 9264}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "eca4943068d749bbab21c9c21dc66edd", "name": "Israel 2006 parliamentary (overnight israel_2006_knesset17.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Israel", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.il/api/3/action/datastore_search?resource_id=70f8bc93-8d98-4c20-ad7c-768af713f1c5", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Labor\u2013Meimad": "Labor\u2013Meimad", "United Torah Judaism": "United Torah Judaism", "Balad": "Balad", "Brit Olam": "Brit Olam", "Hadash": "Hadash", "Lehem": "Lehem", "Atid Ehad": "Atid Ehad", "Gil": "Gil", "Hetz": "Hetz", "National Union\u2013National Religious Party": "National Union\u2013National Religious Party", "Shinui": "Shinui", "Jewish National Front": "Jewish National Front", "Kadima": "Kadima", "Tzomet": "Tzomet", "Yisrael Beiteinu": "Yisrael Beiteinu", "Likud": "Likud", "Meretz-Yachad": "Meretz-Yachad", "Herut \u2013 The National Movement": "Herut \u2013 The National Movement", "United Arab List\u2013Ta'al": "United Arab List\u2013Ta'al", "Tafnit": "Tafnit", "Lev": "Lev", "Oz LaAniyim": "Oz LaAniyim", "HaLev": "HaLev", "Leader": "Leader", "The New Zionism": "The New Zionism", "Da'am Workers Party": "Da'am Workers Party", "Justice for All": "Justice for All", "Ale Yarok": "Ale Yarok", "Arab National Party": "Arab National Party", "Green Party": "Green Party", "Shas": "Shas"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8426, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 8425, "cast_valid_mismatch": 7884, "registered_not_positive": 8426}, "n_stations_flagged": 8426, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:43.323751", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.831, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.847, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.764, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.687, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.465, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.554, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.466, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.473, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.764, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.687, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.123, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.123, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.872, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8426}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d0cf7f58a592487087bb9af19c125131", "name": "Israel 2003 parliamentary (overnight israel_2003_knesset16.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Israel", "year": 2003, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.il/api/3/action/datastore_search?resource_id=498b48e9-5af6-474d-b7a4-5ac1e21d3a08", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Labor\u2013Meimad": "Labor\u2013Meimad", "National Religious Party": "National Religious Party", "United Torah Judaism": "United Torah Judaism", "Balad": "Balad", "Hadash\u2013Ta'al": "Hadash\u2013Ta'al", "Za'am": "Za'am", "\u05d6\u05da": "\u05d6\u05da", "Ahavat Yisrael": "Ahavat Yisrael", "Man's Rights in the Family Party": "Man's Rights in the Family Party", "Shinui": "Shinui", "Yisrael BaAliyah": "Yisrael BaAliyah", "National Union": "National Union", "One Nation": "One Nation", "Likud": "Likud", "Meretz - Democratic Choice - Shahar": "Meretz - Democratic Choice - Shahar", "Yisrael Aheret": "Yisrael Aheret", "Herut \u2013 The National Movement": "Herut \u2013 The National Movement", "United Arab List": "United Arab List", "Leader": "Leader", "Centre Party": "Centre Party", "Tzomet": "Tzomet", "Progressive National Alliance": "Progressive National Alliance", "Da'am Workers Party": "Da'am Workers Party", "Citizen and State": "Citizen and State", "Ale Yarok": "Ale Yarok", "Lahava": "Lahava", "The Greens": "The Greens", "Shas": "Shas"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7885, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:18.687469", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.854, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.885, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.76, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.683, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.828, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.27, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.554, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.466, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.415, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.604, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.683, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.683, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.627, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.627, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.12, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.12, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.872, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7885}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f92d93c109f74b8dbf237a04bb1b96b5", "name": "Iraq 2010 parliamentary (overnight iq_2010_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Iraq", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/IQ/IQ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ina": "ina", "ti": "ti", "solc": "solc", "kiu": "kiu", "cha": "cha", "kig": "kig", "ka": "ka", "ia": "ia", "cui": "cui", "rl-v-1": "rl-v-1", "ymfp": "ymfp", "cpasa": "cpasa", "ind": "ind"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18, "granularity": "province", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 18}, "n_stations_flagged": 18, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:17.685367", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.3, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.332, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.414, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.251, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.3, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.575, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.332, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.583, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.675, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.245, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.311, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.541, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.536, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.384, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.414, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.414, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.251, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.251, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.236, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.236, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.489, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.489, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.613, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.613, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "76c3001d588c43b893d4b3c90256edd9", "name": "Haiti 2015 parliamentary (overnight ht_2015_parliamentary_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Haiti", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/HT/HT.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"aaa": "aaa", "bouclier": "bouclier", "c-n-p-p-h": "c-n-p-p-h", "fanmi-lavalas": "fanmi-lavalas", "fusion": "fusion", "inite-patriyotik": "inite-patriyotik", "kid": "kid", "konsyans-patriyotik": "konsyans-patriyotik", "kontrapepla": "kontrapepla", "lapeh": "lapeh", "m-a-s": "m-a-s", "m-n": "m-n", "monha": "monha", "mopod": "mopod", "mosano": "mosano", "opl": "opl", "p-h-t-k": "p-h-t-k", "pf": "pf", "plateforme-politique-palmis": "plateforme-politique-palmis", "platf-m-leve-kanpe": "platf-m-leve-kanpe", "platf-m-pitit-dessalines": "platf-m-pitit-dessalines", "pont": "pont", "randevous": "randevous", "reklam": "reklam", "renmen-ayiti": "renmen-ayiti", "rph": "rph", "uncrh": "uncrh", "verite": "verite"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 84, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 84, "registered_not_positive": 84}, "n_stations_flagged": 84, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:17.301940", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.49, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.425, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.243, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.463, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.49, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.211, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.09, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.522, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.2, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.425, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.425, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.243, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.243, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.134, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.2, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.2, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": null, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "HTI", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 84}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6de25efaf36e4558bf1c7f3f39639a7d", "name": "Haiti 2015 parliamentary (overnight ht_2015_parliamentary_annulled-aug.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Haiti", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/HT/HT.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"aaa": "aaa", "adebha": "adebha", "adrena": "adrena", "ansanm-patriyot-pou-lavni-ayiti": "ansanm-patriyot-pou-lavni-ayiti", "ateri": "ateri", "bloc-20": "bloc-20", "bouclier": "bouclier", "c-n-p-p-h": "c-n-p-p-h", "canaan": "canaan", "conapph": "conapph", "delivrans": "delivrans", "entreh": "entreh", "fanmi-lavalas": "fanmi-lavalas", "force-democratique-haitien-integr": "force-democratique-haitien-integr", "fun": "fun", "furh": "furh", "fusion": "fusion", "inite-patriyotik": "inite-patriyotik", "k-l-e": "k-l-e", "kid": "kid", "kona": "kona", "konfyans": "konfyans", "konsyans-patriyotik": "konsyans-patriyotik", "kontrapepla": "kontrapepla", "lapeh": "lapeh", "m-a-s": "m-a-s", "m-n": "m-n", "m-u-r": "m-u-r", "mochrenha": "mochrenha", "monha": "monha", "mopam": "mopam", "mopod": "mopod", "nouvelle-haiti": "nouvelle-haiti", "olahh": "olahh", "opl": "opl", "p-h-t-k": "p-h-t-k", "p-n-c-h": "p-n-c-h", "pac": "pac", "panah": "panah", "pkn": "pkn", "plateforme-jistis": "plateforme-jistis", "plateforme-politique-palmis": "plateforme-politique-palmis", "plateforme-politique-solution": "plateforme-politique-solution", "plateforme-rapwoche": "plateforme-rapwoche", "platf-m-leve-kanpe": "platf-m-leve-kanpe", "platf-m-peyizan": "platf-m-peyizan", "platf-m-pitit-dessalines": "platf-m-pitit-dessalines", "pont": "pont", "ppff": "ppff", "ppg18": "ppg18", "ppra": "ppra", "prha": "prha", "psuh": "psuh", "randevous": "randevous", "renmen-ayiti": "renmen-ayiti", "reparen": "reparen", "respe": "respe", "tet-ansanm-pour-le-sauvetage-haiti": "tet-ansanm-pour-le-sauvetage-haiti", "u-p-a-n": "u-p-a-n", "uncrh": "uncrh", "undh": "undh", "unir-ayiti-ini": "unir-ayiti-ini", "verite": "verite"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 22, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 22, "cast_gt_registered": 22, "votes_gt_valid": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 22, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:17.063261", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.49, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.425, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.243, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.463, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.49, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.211, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.09, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.522, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.2, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.425, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.425, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.243, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.243, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.134, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.2, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.2, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": null, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "HTI", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 22}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3d755d8838ab4b85b40315ed4827471a", "name": "Guyana 2015 parliamentary (overnight gy_2015_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Guyana", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GY/GY.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"urp": "urp", "nip": "nip", "pppc": "pppc", "tuf": "tuf", "apnuafc": "apnuafc", "ip": "ip"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "region", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:16.812839", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.203, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.401, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.65, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.444, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.203, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.401, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.041, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.265, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.566, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.194, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.595, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.162, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.29, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.65, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.444, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.444, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.463, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.463, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.672, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.416, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.416, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "224c6722ed5a438d8ea20221eb85d3f1", "name": "Guyana 2011 parliamentary (overnight gy_2011_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Guyana", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GY/GY.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"afc": "afc", "apnu": "apnu", "pppc": "pppc", "tuf": "tuf"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "region", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 10, "cast_gt_registered": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:16.675725", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.115, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.123, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.582, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.369, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.115, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.123, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.285, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.018, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.504, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.191, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.298, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.582, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.369, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.369, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.399, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.399, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.626, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.626, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "adce069451124b3c8da996d3c03c5858", "name": "Guyana 2006 parliamentary (overnight gy_2006_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Guyana", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GY/GY.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"afc": "afc", "gap-roar": "gap-roar", "jfap": "jfap", "pncr-1g": "pncr-1g", "pppc": "pppc", "tuf": "tuf"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "region", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:16.544655", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.162, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.193, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.583, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.369, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.162, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.193, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.25, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.018, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.504, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.095, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.274, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.583, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.583, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.369, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.369, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.405, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.405, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.647, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.716, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ecb224bae6584cdc8de2f51a27f97ceb", "name": "Guyana 2001 parliamentary (overnight gy_2001_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Guyana", "year": 2001, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GY/GY.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"gap-wpa": "gap-wpa", "roar": "roar", "gdp": "gdp", "jfap": "jfap", "pncr": "pncr", "pppc": "pppc", "tuf": "tuf", "nfa": "nfa"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "region", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:16.405894", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.265, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.028, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.553, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.353, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.265, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.028, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.291, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.018, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.504, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.195, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.553, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.353, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.353, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.388, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.702, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.663, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.663, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "13f959b2a4504b2b9ac564bc088ef392", "name": "Guyana 1997 parliamentary (overnight gy_1997_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Guyana", "year": 1997, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GY/GY.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"afg": "afg", "aggg": "aggg", "gbg": "gbg", "gdp": "gdp", "jfap": "jfap", "ndf": "ndf", "nip": "nip", "pnc": "pnc", "pppc": "pppc", "tuf": "tuf"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": "region", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:16.253414", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.007, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.017, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.452, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.304, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.007, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.017, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.504, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.409, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.49, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.018, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.504, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.139, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.285, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.452, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.304, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.304, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.307, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.307, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.731, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.731, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.571, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 11}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6c99f58ee69f4eb1af935c138cae45cb", "name": "Guinea-Bissau 2014 parliamentary (overnight gw_2014_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Guinea-Bissau", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GW/GW.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"psgb": "psgb", "fds": "fds", "pusd": "pusd", "upg": "upg", "prn": "prn", "um": "um", "prs": "prs", "pcd": "pcd", "rgb": "rgb", "psd": "psd", "paigc": "paigc", "pnd": "pnd", "mp": "mp", "pt": "pt", "prid": "prid"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 29, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:16.049844", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.849, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.29, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.439, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.27, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.29, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.117, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.472, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.771, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.285, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.071, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.27, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.27, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.255, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.255, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.698, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.698, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.589, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.589, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.666, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "PAIGC", "winner_candidate": "Jos\u00e9 M\u00e1rio Vaz", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 23.84, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "GNB", "year": 2014, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 29}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "afbcb78a837e47abbec3118c3099ea85", "name": "Guinea 2013 parliamentary (overnight gn_2013_parliamentary_smd.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Guinea", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GN/GN.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"upr": "upr", "pedn": "pedn", "afia": "afia", "ngr": "ngr", "pgrp": "pgrp", "rdig": "rdig", "adcboc": "adcboc", "unr": "unr", "pts": "pts", "raec": "raec", "ugdd": "ugdd", "ufr": "ufr", "gpt": "gpt", "ufdg": "ufdg", "grup": "grup", "ufd": "ufd", "upg": "upg", "pdgrda": "pdgrda", "geci": "geci", "rgud": "rgud", "grd": "grd", "frondeg": "frondeg", "rgp": "rgp", "pdp": "pdp", "dg": "dg", "uned": "uned"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 37, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1, "cast_valid_mismatch": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:15.801939", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.139, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.498, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.322, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.117, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.139, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.229, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.49, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.285, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.419, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.355, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.266, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.322, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.322, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.117, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.117, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.198, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.578, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.578, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.685, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 37}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c884d79721ed4a40a9fa4abd43f5bd04", "name": "Guinea 2013 parliamentary (overnight gn_2013_parliamentary_pr.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Guinea", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GN/GN.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"upr": "upr", "pedn": "pedn", "afia": "afia", "ngr": "ngr", "pgrp": "pgrp", "rdig": "rdig", "pup": "pup", "adcboc": "adcboc", "unr": "unr", "pts": "pts", "raec": "raec", "ugdd": "ugdd", "ufr": "ufr", "gpt": "gpt", "gud": "gud", "ufdg": "ufdg", "grup": "grup", "pnr": "pnr", "ufd": "ufd", "upg": "upg", "pdgrda": "pdgrda", "ppg": "ppg"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 54, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:15.501493", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.139, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.498, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.322, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.117, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.139, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.229, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.49, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.285, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.419, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.355, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.266, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.322, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.322, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.117, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.117, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.198, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.578, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.578, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.685, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 54}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9e871d30b9dd497a86abe2001aaf41fa", "name": "Gambia 2017 parliamentary (overnight gm_2017_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Gambia", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GM/GM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"aprc": "aprc", "ppp": "ppp", "ncp": "ncp", "pdois": "pdois", "udp": "udp", "gdc": "gdc", "gpdp": "gpdp", "nrp-v-1": "nrp-v-1", "gmc-v-1": "gmc-v-1", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 53, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 53, "registered_not_positive": 53}, "n_stations_flagged": 53, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:15.215019", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "United Democratic Party (UDP) and 'Coalition 2016'", "winner_candidate": "Adama Barrow", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Alliance for Patriotic Reorientation and Construction (APRC)", "margin": 3.7, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "GMB", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 53}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b77515579fb24711bb807d6611145e36", "name": "Gambia 2012 parliamentary (overnight gm_2012_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Gambia", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GM/GM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"nrp": "nrp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 48, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 48, "cast_gt_registered": 23}, "n_stations_flagged": 48, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:14.979712", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "APRC", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "UDP", "margin": 54.18, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "GMB", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 48}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "49cd0c02cc004111977568cc9ee854ef", "name": "Gambia 1992 parliamentary (overnight gm_1992_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Gambia", "year": 1992, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GM/GM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ppp": "ppp", "ncp": "ncp", "upncp": "upncp", "gpp": "gpp", "pdois": "pdois", "pdp": "pdp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 36, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 36, "registered_not_positive": 36}, "n_stations_flagged": 36, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:14.761507", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "PPP", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "NCP", "margin": 36.4, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "GMB", "year": 1992, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 36}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ed04512ffb464dcf8fef1588c09c77cf", "name": "Gambia 1987 parliamentary (overnight gm_1987_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Gambia", "year": 1987, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GM/GM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ppp": "ppp", "ncp": "ncp", "upncp": "upncp", "gpp": "gpp", "pdois": "pdois", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 36, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 36, "cast_gt_registered": 36}, "n_stations_flagged": 36, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:14.541572", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "PPP", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "NCP", "margin": 31.0, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "GMB", "year": 1987, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 36}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "41006993181748d789b4a2925031d13f", "name": "Gambia 1982 parliamentary (overnight gm_1982_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Gambia", "year": 1982, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GM/GM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"up": "up", "ncp": "ncp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 35, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 31, "registered_not_positive": 35}, "n_stations_flagged": 35, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:14.352782", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "PPP", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "NCP", "margin": 44.88, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "GMB", "year": 1982, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 35}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6db5e2633ecb478ab2d8498cfea7cf38", "name": "Gambia 1977 parliamentary (overnight gm_1977_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Gambia", "year": 1977, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GM/GM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ppp": "ppp", "up": "up", "upnlp": "upnlp", "ncp": "ncp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 35, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 35, "registered_not_positive": 35}, "n_stations_flagged": 35, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:14.161989", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 35}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "16f07183c1d34029828700b9588cb627", "name": "Gambia 1972 parliamentary (overnight gm_1972_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Gambia", "year": 1972, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GM/GM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"up": "up", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 32, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 25, "registered_not_positive": 32}, "n_stations_flagged": 32, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:13.998089", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 32}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "61b4c1ef143049039d35ceb88c2153cd", "name": "Gambia 1966 parliamentary (overnight gm_1966_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Gambia", "year": 1966, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GM/GM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ppp": "ppp", "up": "up", "upgcp": "upgcp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 32, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 32, "registered_not_positive": 32}, "n_stations_flagged": 32, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:13.787271", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 32}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e4287772b94441f5974ac2506143b49f", "name": "Gambia 1962 parliamentary (overnight gm_1962_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Gambia", "year": 1962, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GM/GM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ppp": "ppp", "up": "up", "dca": "dca", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 32, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 32, "cast_gt_registered": 31}, "n_stations_flagged": 32, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:13.557246", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 32}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d5e13a2f1bf341acb90b782376a5734d", "name": "Gambia 1960 parliamentary (overnight gm_1960_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Gambia", "year": 1960, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GM/GM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ppp": "ppp", "indppp": "indppp", "up": "up", "indup": "indup", "dca": "dca", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 18, "registered_not_positive": 19}, "n_stations_flagged": 19, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:13.400532", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 19}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3d2d5741b6d643d987c5330c3e8328c2", "name": "Gambia 1954 parliamentary (overnight gm_1954_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Gambia", "year": 1954, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GM/GM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"up": "up", "gpp": "gpp", "gdp": "gdp", "gmc": "gmc", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 3, "cast_gt_registered": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:13.279467", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "18dd2f6e4a3a445584b5fc994aabc275", "name": "Gambia 1951 parliamentary (overnight gm_1951_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Gambia", "year": 1951, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GM/GM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"gdp": "gdp", "byms": "byms", "gnl": "gnl", "cpp1": "cpp1", "cpp2": "cpp2", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 3, "cast_gt_registered": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:13.170637", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8f1cdd432a484f4586b5875196df5b7c", "name": "Gambia 1947 parliamentary (overnight gm_1947_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Gambia", "year": 1947, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GM/GM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:13.052405", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "48ac9910e3ce4a0cb01b7cfd41dde972", "name": "Georgia 2024 parliamentary (overnight georgia_2024_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Georgia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://huggingface.co/datasets/Rexhaif/georgian-parliamentary-elections-2024-protocols", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"The Party of Georgian Unity and Development": "The Party of Georgian Unity and Development", "Coalition for Changes Gvaramia Melia Girchi Droa": "Coalition for Changes Gvaramia Melia Girchi Droa", "Unity-National Movement": "Unity-National Movement", "European Democrats": "European Democrats", "Alliance of Patriots of Georgia": "Alliance of Patriots of Georgia", "Strong Georgia - Lelo, For People, For Liberty!": "Strong Georgia - Lelo, For People, For Liberty!", "Georgian Labour Party": "Georgian Labour Party", "Our United Georgia": "Our United Georgia", "Change Georgia": "Change Georgia", "Sakartvelo": "Sakartvelo", "Free Georgia": "Free Georgia", "Tribune": "Tribune", "Chven": "Chven", "Gakharia for Georgia": "Gakharia for Georgia", "Left-Wing Alliance": "Left-Wing Alliance", "Unity of Georgian": "Unity of Georgian", "Girchi": "Girchi", "Georgian Dream": "Georgian Dream"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3109, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 3109, "registered_not_positive": 3109}, "n_stations_flagged": 3109, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:03.431211", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.642, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 0.436, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.48, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.327, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 0.436, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.109, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.121, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.53, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.177, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.599, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.168, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.542, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.48, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.48, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.327, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.327, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.443, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.188, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.188, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.701, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3109}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4f649bef4c28406da17654d92905b144", "name": "Grenada 2013 parliamentary (overnight gd_2013_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Grenada", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GD/GD.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"nnp": "nnp", "ndc": "ndc", "god": "god", "grp": "grp", "mic": "mic", "gupm": "gupm", "nuf": "nuf", "pulp": "pulp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:03.048540", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 15}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9f72154b74664eef94fcf914479e2762", "name": "Grenada 2008 parliamentary (overnight gd_2008_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Grenada", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GD/GD.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"nnp": "nnp", "ndc": "ndc", "ulp": "ulp", "god": "god", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 15, "registered_not_positive": 15}, "n_stations_flagged": 15, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:02.886350", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 15}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7a06b0d4cd094177bc06ea55a52e7ae2", "name": "Grenada 2003 parliamentary (overnight gd_2003_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Grenada", "year": 2003, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GD/GD.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"gulp": "gulp", "nnp": "nnp", "ndc": "ndc", "god": "god", "plm": "plm", "grp": "grp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 15, "cast_gt_registered": 15}, "n_stations_flagged": 15, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:02.745269", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 15}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d9cf42e5e2714e2d908a948d4451c972", "name": "Grenada 1999 parliamentary (overnight gd_1999_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Grenada", "year": 1999, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GD/GD.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"gulp": "gulp", "nnp": "nnp", "ndc": "ndc", "mbpm": "mbpm", "god": "god", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 15, "registered_not_positive": 15}, "n_stations_flagged": 15, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:02.606513", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 15}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "379159c910464587aeae7b51a131710c", "name": "Grenada 1995 parliamentary (overnight gd_1995_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Grenada", "year": 1995, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GD/GD.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"gulp": "gulp", "nnp": "nnp", "ndc": "ndc", "mbpm": "mbpm", "god": "god", "tnp": "tnp", "urp": "urp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 15, "registered_not_positive": 15}, "n_stations_flagged": 15, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:02.459913", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 15}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "12ab9ca06ceb4f2cbb8f8ec8aad79aa1", "name": "Grenada 1990 parliamentary (overnight gd_1990_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Grenada", "year": 1990, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GD/GD.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"gulp": "gulp", "nnp": "nnp", "ndc": "ndc", "mbpm": "mbpm", "god": "god", "tnp": "tnp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 15, "registered_not_positive": 15}, "n_stations_flagged": 15, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:02.318109", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 15}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a0e8573150b54b6cacc63ccd219e481b", "name": "Grenada 1984 parliamentary (overnight gd_1984_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Grenada", "year": 1984, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GD/GD.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"gflp": "gflp", "gulp": "gulp", "nnp": "nnp", "mbpm": "mbpm", "cdlp": "cdlp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 15, "registered_not_positive": 15}, "n_stations_flagged": 15, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:02.169866", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 15}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d08ee8f4a4a74f49a8c374b66743f855", "name": "Grenada 1976 parliamentary (overnight gd_1976_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Grenada", "year": 1976, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GD/GD.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"gulp": "gulp", "pa": "pa", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 15, "registered_not_positive": 15}, "n_stations_flagged": 15, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:02.014335", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 15}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "96552a0e3e04493b826a2df7bbc86518", "name": "Grenada 1972 parliamentary (overnight gd_1972_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Grenada", "year": 1972, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GD/GD.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"gnp": "gnp", "gulp": "gulp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 15, "cast_gt_registered": 15}, "n_stations_flagged": 15, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:01.879490", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 15}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0f85d20312794b73b3664be46b856698", "name": "Grenada 1967 parliamentary (overnight gd_1967_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Grenada", "year": 1967, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GD/GD.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"gnp": "gnp", "gulp": "gulp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 10, "registered_not_positive": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:01.748593", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bbdcadbc82714e4eaf0742d468d907b5", "name": "Grenada 1962 parliamentary (overnight gd_1962_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Grenada", "year": 1962, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GD/GD.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"gnp": "gnp", "gulp": "gulp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 10, "cast_gt_registered": 9}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:01.615668", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "27de81b729814e368877aa0420519579", "name": "Grenada 1961 parliamentary (overnight gd_1961_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Grenada", "year": 1961, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GD/GD.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"gnp": "gnp", "gulp": "gulp", "ppm": "ppm", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 10, "cast_gt_registered": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:01.492012", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7ee6469e4a9645e8aba9b2c1688677f7", "name": "Grenada 1957 parliamentary (overnight gd_1957_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Grenada", "year": 1957, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GD/GD.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"gflp": "gflp", "gnp": "gnp", "gulp": "gulp", "pdm": "pdm", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 8, "cast_gt_registered": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:01.374726", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "213f7d915e5748db90dfe8832c2122aa", "name": "Grenada 1954 parliamentary (overnight gd_1954_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Grenada", "year": 1954, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GD/GD.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"gulp": "gulp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 8, "registered_not_positive": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:01.254303", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "461fe310205d48f69cc42442f1690c0b", "name": "Grenada 1951 parliamentary (overnight gd_1951_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Grenada", "year": 1951, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/GD/GD.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ac": "ac", "mmwu": "mmwu", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 8, "registered_not_positive": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:01.133683", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f968c0276c4948eaa532ddd4061214a2", "name": "Dominican Republic 2010 parliamentary (overnight dr_2010_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominican Republic", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/DR/DR.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"prd": "prd", "asd": "asd", "pun": "pun", "prsc": "prsc", "ppc": "ppc", "pld": "pld", "bis": "bis", "apd": "apd", "pqd": "pqd", "pri": "pri", "pdp": "pdp", "ptd": "ptd", "pnvc": "pnvc", "miuca": "miuca", "udc": "udc", "prsd": "prsd", "pvud": "pvud", "plrd": "plrd", "phd": "phd", "dxc": "dxc", "fnp": "fnp", "moda": "moda", "pal": "pal", "pasove": "pasove", "pcr": "pcr", "pdi": "pdi"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 48, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:00.909603", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.145, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.784, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.625, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.145, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.537, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.662, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.516, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.629, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.204, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.568, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.326, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.326, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.417, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.417, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 48}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e514bd1465da48938de05c2deca3d112", "name": "Dominican Republic 2006 parliamentary (overnight dr_2006_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominican Republic", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/DR/DR.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"prd": "prd", "asd": "asd", "prn": "prn", "pun": "pun", "prsc": "prsc", "ppc": "ppc", "pld": "pld", "bis": "bis", "apd": "apd", "pqd": "pqd", "pri": "pri", "pdp": "pdp", "ptd": "ptd", "pnvc": "pnvc", "miuca": "miuca", "udc": "udc", "prsd": "prsd", "pvud": "pvud", "plrd": "plrd", "phd": "phd"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 47, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 47}, "n_stations_flagged": 47, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:00.634353", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.375, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.788, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.644, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.378, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.375, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.788, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.697, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.632, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.69, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.529, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.204, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.558, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.39, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.644, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.644, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.378, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.378, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.337, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.337, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.433, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.433, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 47}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "75ec6a0abec94854930c57205706ba0c", "name": "Dominican Republic 2002 parliamentary (overnight dr_2002_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominican Republic", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/DR/DR.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"prd": "prd", "asd": "asd", "prn": "prn", "pun": "pun", "prsc": "prsc", "ppc": "ppc", "pld": "pld", "bis": "bis", "apd": "apd", "pqd": "pqd", "pri": "pri", "pdp": "pdp", "ptd": "ptd", "pnvc": "pnvc", "miuca": "miuca", "udc": "udc", "fr": "fr", "pna": "pna", "misar": "misar"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 47, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 47, "cast_valid_mismatch": 47, "registered_not_positive": 47}, "n_stations_flagged": 47, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:00.353769", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.672, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.335, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.672, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.388, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.672, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.335, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.692, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.715, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.529, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.204, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.214, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.672, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.388, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.35, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.35, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.429, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 47}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2cc89389cf3a403fa3e5bbb0275b1ae6", "name": "Dominica 2014 parliamentary (overnight dm_2014_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominica", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/DM/DM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"dlp": "dlp", "uwp": "uwp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 18}, "n_stations_flagged": 18, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:42:00.141097", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6a9b19430aca45a3b626b34f3b0456a5", "name": "Dominica 2009 parliamentary (overnight dm_2009_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominica", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/DM/DM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"dfp": "dfp", "dlp": "dlp", "uwp": "uwp", "pdm": "pdm", "dpp": "dpp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 21, "registered_not_positive": 21}, "n_stations_flagged": 21, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:59.976999", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c6df9ac607bc4e39962a5894d2706002", "name": "Dominica 2005 parliamentary (overnight dm_2005_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominica", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/DM/DM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"dfp": "dfp", "dlp": "dlp", "uwp": "uwp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 21, "registered_not_positive": 21}, "n_stations_flagged": 21, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:59.796905", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "10549e0c9e98402a8d6c05c31d077cc4", "name": "Dominica 2000 parliamentary (overnight dm_2000_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominica", "year": 2000, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/DM/DM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"dfp": "dfp", "dlp": "dlp", "uwp": "uwp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 21, "cast_gt_registered": 21}, "n_stations_flagged": 21, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:59.618427", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "67a20198cd8f4e02af8e24b9a04edecc", "name": "Dominica 1995 parliamentary (overnight dm_1995_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominica", "year": 1995, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/DM/DM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"dfp": "dfp", "dlp": "dlp", "uwp": "uwp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 21, "cast_gt_registered": 21}, "n_stations_flagged": 21, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:59.440428", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d568817c3902489ea83f5a753a7f17ed", "name": "Dominica 1980 parliamentary (overnight dm_1980_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominica", "year": 1980, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/DM/DM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ddlp": "ddlp", "dfp": "dfp", "dlma": "dlma", "dlp": "dlp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 21, "registered_not_positive": 21}, "n_stations_flagged": 21, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:59.284385", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "322bf35e52fa45cd8b20151701b443f7", "name": "Dominica 1975 parliamentary (overnight dm_1975_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominica", "year": 1975, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/DM/DM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cfp": "cfp", "dfp": "dfp", "dlp": "dlp", "plp": "plp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 21, "registered_not_positive": 21}, "n_stations_flagged": 21, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:59.131084", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a095b766a8674c809a7f19f93fa79899", "name": "Dominica 1970 parliamentary (overnight dm_1970_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominica", "year": 1970, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/DM/DM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"dfp": "dfp", "dlp": "dlp", "llp": "llp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 11, "cast_gt_registered": 11}, "n_stations_flagged": 11, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:58.976885", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 11}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d6109f6dac6c47afaa49ab662717be39", "name": "Dominica 1966 parliamentary (overnight dm_1966_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominica", "year": 1966, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/DM/DM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"dlp": "dlp", "dupp": "dupp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 11, "registered_not_positive": 11}, "n_stations_flagged": 11, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:58.856448", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 11}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3ec6d5430b134aa2b1a76c020f2241b6", "name": "Dominica 1961 parliamentary (overnight dm_1961_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominica", "year": 1961, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/DM/DM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"aiifp": "aiifp", "ddp": "ddp", "dlp": "dlp", "dupp": "dupp", "pwm": "pwm", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 11, "cast_gt_registered": 11}, "n_stations_flagged": 11, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:58.735798", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 11}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fdc23015e86a4cb5931e248dd58531e7", "name": "Dominica 1957 parliamentary (overnight dm_1957_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominica", "year": 1957, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/DM/DM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"dlp": "dlp", "pnm": "pnm", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 8, "registered_not_positive": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:58.623654", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "640c5bbd2aa247ca95829f1d302b4970", "name": "Dominica 1954 parliamentary (overnight dm_1954_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominica", "year": 1954, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/DM/DM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 8, "registered_not_positive": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:58.505494", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d062cf6cc4234d389bf5da045e9459ca", "name": "Dominica 1951 parliamentary (overnight dm_1951_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominica", "year": 1951, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/DM/DM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"tu": "tu", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 8, "registered_not_positive": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:58.378276", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "017b299d2e094f94a079ce4703a1168e", "name": "Cyprus 2026 parliamentary (overnight cyprus_2026_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cyprus", "year": 2026, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.cy/el/resource/5312/download/file", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u0391\u0393\u03a1\u039f\u039d\u039f\u039c\u039f\u03a3 \u0391\u0393\u03a1\u039f\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u0395\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391": "\u0391\u0393\u03a1\u039f\u039d\u039f\u039c\u039f\u03a3 \u0391\u0393\u03a1\u039f\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u0395\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391", "\u0391\u039a\u0395\u039b - \u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u03a1\u0391 - \u039a\u039f\u0399\u039d\u03a9\u039d\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u03a3\u03a5\u039c\u039c\u0391\u03a7\u0399\u0391": "\u0391\u039a\u0395\u039b - \u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u03a1\u0391 - \u039a\u039f\u0399\u039d\u03a9\u039d\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u03a3\u03a5\u039c\u039c\u0391\u03a7\u0399\u0391", "\u0391\u039a\u03a1\u039f - \u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u03a1\u0397 \u0391\u039d\u03a4\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3\u0397 \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u039f\u03a5\u039d\u0399\u03a3\u039c\u039f\u03a3": "\u0391\u039a\u03a1\u039f - \u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u03a1\u0397 \u0391\u039d\u03a4\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3\u0397 \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u039f\u03a5\u039d\u0399\u03a3\u039c\u039f\u03a3", "\u0391\u039b\u039c\u0391 - \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u0395\u03a3 \u0393\u0399\u0391 \u03a4\u0397\u039d \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f": "\u0391\u039b\u039c\u0391 - \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u0395\u03a3 \u0393\u0399\u0391 \u03a4\u0397\u039d \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f", "\u0391\u039c\u0395\u03a3\u0397 \u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u0391 \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u03a5": "\u0391\u039c\u0395\u03a3\u0397 \u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u0391 \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u03a5", "\u0392\u039f\u039b\u03a4 \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u03a3": "\u0392\u039f\u039b\u03a4 \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u03a3", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u0391\u039b\u039b\u0391\u0393\u0397": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u0391\u039b\u039b\u0391\u0393\u0397", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u03a0\u0391\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0391\u039e\u0397 - \u03a3\u03a5\u039d. \u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1. \u0394\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u039c\u0395\u03a9\u039d": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u03a0\u0391\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0391\u039e\u0397 - \u03a3\u03a5\u039d. \u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1. \u0394\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u039c\u0395\u03a9\u039d", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 (\u0394\u0395\u039a)": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 (\u0394\u0395\u039a)", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0395\u03a1\u039c\u039f\u03a3": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0395\u03a1\u039c\u039f\u03a3", "\u0395\u0394\u0395\u039a \u03a3\u039f\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u039b\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391": "\u0395\u0394\u0395\u039a \u03a3\u039f\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u039b\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391", "\u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u039c\u0395\u03a4\u03a9\u03a0\u039f (\u0395.\u039b\u0391.\u039c.)": "\u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u039c\u0395\u03a4\u03a9\u03a0\u039f (\u0395.\u039b\u0391.\u039c.)", "\u0395\u039d\u0395\u03a1\u0393\u039f\u0399 \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u0395\u03a3 - \u039a\u0399\u039d. \u0395\u039d\u03a9\u039c. \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u0399\u03a9\u039d \u039a\u03a5\u039d\u0397\u0393\u03a9\u039d": "\u0395\u039d\u0395\u03a1\u0393\u039f\u0399 \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u0395\u03a3 - \u039a\u0399\u039d. \u0395\u039d\u03a9\u039c. \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u0399\u03a9\u039d \u039a\u03a5\u039d\u0397\u0393\u03a9\u039d", "\u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u03a4\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039f\u03a5 \u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3": "\u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u03a4\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039f\u03a5 \u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3", "\u039a\u0391\u03a4\u03a3\u0399\u0397 \u0399\u03a6\u0399\u0393\u0395\u039d\u0395\u0399\u0391": "\u039a\u0391\u03a4\u03a3\u0399\u0397 \u0399\u03a6\u0399\u0393\u0395\u039d\u0395\u0399\u0391", "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u03a9\u039d - \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0395\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u0391 \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u03a9\u039d": "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u03a9\u039d - \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0395\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u0391 \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u03a9\u039d", "\u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u0391\u0393\u03a9\u039d\u0391\u03a3 \u0395\u039b\u0395\u03a5\u0398\u0395\u03a1\u0399\u0391": "\u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u0391\u0393\u03a9\u039d\u0391\u03a3 \u0395\u039b\u0395\u03a5\u0398\u0395\u03a1\u0399\u0391", "\u039c\u0391\u039a\u03a1\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3 \u0391\u039b\u0395\u039e\u0397\u03a3": "\u039c\u0391\u039a\u03a1\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3 \u0391\u039b\u0395\u039e\u0397\u03a3", "\u039c\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391\u03a4\u0397\u03a3 \u039a\u03a9\u039d\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u039d\u03a4\u0399\u039d\u039f\u03a3": "\u039c\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391\u03a4\u0397\u03a3 \u039a\u03a9\u039d\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u039d\u03a4\u0399\u039d\u039f\u03a3", "\u03a0\u0391\u03a4\u03a1\u0399\u03a9\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039c\u0395\u03a4\u03a9\u03a0\u039f  <<\u039b\u0391\u039a\u0395\u0394\u0391\u0399\u039c\u039f\u039d\u0399\u039f\u0399>>": "\u03a0\u0391\u03a4\u03a1\u0399\u03a9\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039c\u0395\u03a4\u03a9\u03a0\u039f  <<\u039b\u0391\u039a\u0395\u0394\u0391\u0399\u039c\u039f\u039d\u0399\u039f\u0399>>", "\u03a1\u039f\u03a4\u03a3\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3 \u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u039a\u0397\u03a3": "\u03a1\u039f\u03a4\u03a3\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3 \u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u039a\u0397\u03a3", "\u03a3\u0391\u0392\u0392\u0391 \u039a\u03a5\u03a1\u0399\u0391\u039a\u039f\u03a3": "\u03a3\u0391\u0392\u0392\u0391 \u039a\u03a5\u03a1\u0399\u0391\u039a\u039f\u03a3", "\u03a3\u0397\u039a\u039f\u03a5 \u03a0\u0391\u039d\u03a9": "\u03a3\u0397\u039a\u039f\u03a5 \u03a0\u0391\u039d\u03a9", "\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a5 \u039b\u039f\u03a5\u039a\u0391\u03a3": "\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a5 \u039b\u039f\u03a5\u039a\u0391\u03a3", "\u03a4\u0395\u039d\u0399\u0396\u0397\u03a3 \u039c\u0391\u03a1\u0399\u039f\u03a3": "\u03a4\u0395\u039d\u0399\u0396\u0397\u03a3 \u039c\u0391\u03a1\u0399\u039f\u03a3", "\u03a4\u039f \u03a0\u03a1\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u039d\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 \u03a4\u0397\u03a3 \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u03a5": "\u03a4\u039f \u03a0\u03a1\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u039d\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 \u03a4\u0397\u03a3 \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u03a5", "\u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u0394\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a5 \u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u0394\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a3": "\u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u0394\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a5 \u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u0394\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1289, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 962, "registered_not_positive": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 968, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:54.428966", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.774, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.847, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.773, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.664, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.251, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.773, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.773, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.664, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.664, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.684, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.684, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.166, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.166, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1289}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fa49044e372248d18fba2c5398a7a005", "name": "Cyprus 2024 parliamentary (overnight cyprus_2024_ep.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cyprus", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.cy/el/resource/4108/download/file", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u0391\u039a\u0395\u039b (\u0391.\u039a.\u0395.\u039b)  \u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u03a1\u0391 - \u039a\u039f\u0399\u039d\u03a9\u039d\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u03a3\u03a5\u039c\u039c\u0391\u03a7\u0399\u0391": "\u0391\u039a\u0395\u039b (\u0391.\u039a.\u0395.\u039b)  \u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u03a1\u0391 - \u039a\u039f\u0399\u039d\u03a9\u039d\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u03a3\u03a5\u039c\u039c\u0391\u03a7\u0399\u0391", "\u0392\u039f\u039b\u03a4 \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u03a3": "\u0392\u039f\u039b\u03a4 \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u03a3", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u03a0\u0391\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0391\u039e\u0397 - \u03a3\u03a5\u039d. \u0394\u0397\u039c. \u0394\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u039c\u0395\u03a9\u039d": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u03a0\u0391\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0391\u039e\u0397 - \u03a3\u03a5\u039d. \u0394\u0397\u039c. \u0394\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u039c\u0395\u03a9\u039d", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0395\u03a1\u039c\u039f\u03a3": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0395\u03a1\u039c\u039f\u03a3", "\u0395\u0394\u0395\u039a \u03a3\u039f\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u039b\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391": "\u0395\u0394\u0395\u039a \u03a3\u039f\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u039b\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391", "\u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u039c\u0395\u03a4\u03a9\u03a0\u039f (\u0395.\u039b\u0391.\u039c)": "\u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u039c\u0395\u03a4\u03a9\u03a0\u039f (\u0395.\u039b\u0391.\u039c)", "\u0395\u039d\u0395\u03a1\u0393\u039f\u0399 \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u0395\u03a3 - \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u0395\u039d. \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u0399\u03a9\u039d \u039a\u03a5\u039d\u0397\u0393\u03a9\u039d": "\u0395\u039d\u0395\u03a1\u0393\u039f\u0399 \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u0395\u03a3 - \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u0395\u039d. \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u0399\u03a9\u039d \u039a\u03a5\u039d\u0397\u0393\u03a9\u039d", "\u0396\u0395\u03a1\u0392\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3 \u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u039f\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3": "\u0396\u0395\u03a1\u0392\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3 \u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u039f\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3", "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u0394\u03a1\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u03a3": "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u0394\u03a1\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u03a3", "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u03a9\u039d - \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0395\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u0391 \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u03a9\u039d": "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u03a9\u039d - \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0395\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u0391 \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u03a9\u039d", "\u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 \u0393\u0399\u0391 \u03a4\u0391 \u0396\u03a9\u0391 \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u03a5": "\u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 \u0393\u0399\u0391 \u03a4\u0391 \u0396\u03a9\u0391 \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u03a5", "\u039d\u0399\u039a\u0397": "\u039d\u0399\u039a\u0397", "\u03a0\u0391\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0399\u03a9\u03a4\u039f\u03a5 \u03a6\u0395\u0399\u0394\u0399\u0391\u03a3": "\u03a0\u0391\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0399\u03a9\u03a4\u039f\u03a5 \u03a6\u0395\u0399\u0394\u0399\u0391\u03a3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1598, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1598, "cast_gt_registered": 1580}, "n_stations_flagged": 1598, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:49.094462", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.774, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.847, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.777, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.653, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.251, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.653, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.687, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.161, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.161, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.823, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1598}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5fe1b45525224a39a64d5d69de36a57f", "name": "Cyprus 2023 presidential (overnight cyprus_2023_presidential_r2_ballotbox.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cyprus", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.cy/sites/default/files/results_0.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3 \u039c\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u0393\u0399\u0391\u039d\u039d\u0397\u03a3": "\u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3 \u039c\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u0393\u0399\u0391\u039d\u039d\u0397\u03a3", "\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u0394\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3": "\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u0394\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1147, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1011}, "n_stations_flagged": 1011, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:45.131003", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.774, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.847, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.777, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.643, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.251, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.643, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.643, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.674, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.196, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.196, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1147}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "57b9ad2bb54e4080af1891cb1e6618f6", "name": "Cyprus 2023 presidential (overnight cyprus_2023_presidential_r1_ballotbox.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cyprus", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.cy/sites/default/files/results.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u0391\u0392\u0395\u03a1\u03a9\u03a6 \u039d\u0395\u039f\u03a6\u03a5\u03a4\u039f\u03a5": "\u0391\u0392\u0395\u03a1\u03a9\u03a6 \u039d\u0395\u039f\u03a6\u03a5\u03a4\u039f\u03a5", "\u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a3 \u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a5": "\u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a3 \u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a5", "\u0399\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u0399\u0391 \u03a7\u039f\u0392\u03a1\u0399\u039d\u0391 \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039d\u0397\u039d\u039f\u03a3": "\u0399\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u0399\u0391 \u03a7\u039f\u0392\u03a1\u0399\u039d\u0391 \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039d\u0397\u039d\u039f\u03a3", "\u03a7\u0391\u03a1\u0391\u039b\u0391\u039c\u03a0\u039f\u03a3 \u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a4\u0395\u039b\u039f\u03a5\u03a3": "\u03a7\u0391\u03a1\u0391\u039b\u0391\u039c\u03a0\u039f\u03a3 \u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a4\u0395\u039b\u039f\u03a5\u03a3", "\u0391\u03a7\u0399\u039b\u039b\u0395\u0391\u03a3 \u0394\u0397\u039c\u0397\u03a4\u03a1\u0399\u0391\u0394\u0397\u03a3": "\u0391\u03a7\u0399\u039b\u039b\u0395\u0391\u03a3 \u0394\u0397\u039c\u0397\u03a4\u03a1\u0399\u0391\u0394\u0397\u03a3", "\u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3 \u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u03a4\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039f\u03a5": "\u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3 \u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u03a4\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039f\u03a5", "\u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u039f\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u0396\u0395\u03a1\u0392\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3": "\u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u039f\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u0396\u0395\u03a1\u0392\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3", "\u0393\u0399\u03a9\u03a1\u0393\u039f\u03a3 \u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u039a\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3": "\u0393\u0399\u03a9\u03a1\u0393\u039f\u03a3 \u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u039a\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3", "\u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3 \u039c\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u0393\u0399\u0391\u039d\u039d\u0397\u03a3": "\u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3 \u039c\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u0393\u0399\u0391\u039d\u039d\u0397\u03a3", "\u03a4\u03a3\u0395\u039b\u0395\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039d\u0391 \u039d\u03a4\u0395 \u03a0\u0395\u03a4\u03a1\u039f": "\u03a4\u03a3\u0395\u039b\u0395\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039d\u0391 \u039d\u03a4\u0395 \u03a0\u0395\u03a4\u03a1\u039f", "\u0391\u039b\u0395\u039e\u0399\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u0391\u0392\u0392\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3": "\u0391\u039b\u0395\u039e\u0399\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u0391\u0392\u0392\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3", "\u039b\u039f\u03a5\u039a\u0391\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a5": "\u039b\u039f\u03a5\u039a\u0391\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a5", "\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u0394\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3": "\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u0394\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3", "\u039a\u03a9\u039d\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u039d\u03a4\u0399\u039d\u039f\u03a3 \u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a6\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3": "\u039a\u03a9\u039d\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u039d\u03a4\u0399\u039d\u039f\u03a3 \u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a6\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1147, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 809}, "n_stations_flagged": 809, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:41.512890", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.774, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.847, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.777, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.643, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.251, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.643, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.643, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.674, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.196, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.196, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1147}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3bc58d1399f947d08051f3077497e6f3", "name": "Cyprus 2021 parliamentary (overnight cyprus_2021_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cyprus", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.cy/sites/default/files/Results.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u0391\u039a\u0395\u039b (\u0391\u039d\u039f\u03a1\u0398\u03a9\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 \u0395\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u0396\u039f\u039c\u0395\u039d\u039f\u03a5 \u039b\u0391\u039f\u03a5)": "\u0391\u039a\u0395\u039b (\u0391\u039d\u039f\u03a1\u0398\u03a9\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 \u0395\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u0396\u039f\u039c\u0395\u039d\u039f\u03a5 \u039b\u0391\u039f\u03a5)", "\u0391\u039b\u039b\u0391\u0393\u0397 \u0393\u0395\u039d\u0399\u0391\u03a3": "\u0391\u039b\u039b\u0391\u0393\u0397 \u0393\u0395\u039d\u0399\u0391\u03a3", "\u0391\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039b\u0395\u0393\u0393\u03a5\u0397": "\u0391\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039b\u0395\u0393\u0393\u03a5\u0397", "\u0391\u039c\u039c\u039f\u03a7\u03a9\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a3 \u0393\u0399\u0391 \u03a4\u0397\u039d \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f": "\u0391\u039c\u039c\u039f\u03a7\u03a9\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a3 \u0393\u0399\u0391 \u03a4\u0397\u039d \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f", "\u0391\u03a6\u03a5\u03a0\u039d\u0399\u03a3\u0397 -2020-": "\u0391\u03a6\u03a5\u03a0\u039d\u0399\u03a3\u0397 -2020-", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u03a0\u0391\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0391\u039e\u0397": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u03a0\u0391\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0391\u039e\u0397", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0395\u03a1\u039c\u039f\u03a3": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0395\u03a1\u039c\u039f\u03a3", "\u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u039c\u0395\u03a4\u03a9\u03a0\u039f (\u0395.\u039b\u0391.\u039c.)": "\u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u039c\u0395\u03a4\u03a9\u03a0\u039f (\u0395.\u039b\u0391.\u039c.)", "\u0395\u039d\u0395\u03a1\u0393\u039f\u0399 \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u0395\u03a3-\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u0395\u039d.\u039a\u03a5\u03a0. \u039a\u03a5\u039d\u0397\u0393\u03a9\u039d": "\u0395\u039d\u0395\u03a1\u0393\u039f\u0399 \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u0395\u03a3-\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u0395\u039d.\u039a\u03a5\u03a0. \u039a\u03a5\u039d\u0397\u0393\u03a9\u039d", "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u03a9\u039d-\u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0395\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u0391 \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u03a9\u039d": "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u03a9\u039d-\u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0395\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u0391 \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u03a9\u039d", "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u03a3\u039f\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u039b\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u03a9\u039d \u0395\u0394\u0395\u039a": "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u03a3\u039f\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u039b\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u03a9\u039d \u0395\u0394\u0395\u039a", "\u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 \u0393\u0399\u0391 \u03a4\u0391 \u0396\u03a9\u0391 \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u03a5": "\u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 \u0393\u0399\u0391 \u03a4\u0391 \u0396\u03a9\u0391 \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u03a5", "\u03a0\u0391\u03a4\u03a1\u0399\u03a9\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u03a3\u03a0\u0399\u03a3\u039c\u039f\u03a3": "\u03a0\u0391\u03a4\u03a1\u0399\u03a9\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u03a3\u03a0\u0399\u03a3\u039c\u039f\u03a3", "\u03a0\u039d\u039f\u0397 \u039b\u0391\u039f\u03a5": "\u03a0\u039d\u039f\u0397 \u039b\u0391\u039f\u03a5", "\u039c\u0391\u03a1\u0394\u0391\u03a0\u0397\u03a4\u03a4\u0391\u03a3 \u03a7\u03a1\u03a5\u03a3\u0391\u039d\u0398\u039f\u03a3": "\u039c\u0391\u03a1\u0394\u0391\u03a0\u0397\u03a4\u03a4\u0391\u03a3 \u03a7\u03a1\u03a5\u03a3\u0391\u039d\u0398\u039f\u03a3", "\u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a5 \u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3": "\u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a5 \u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3", "\u03a7\u03a1\u03a5\u03a3\u0391\u039d\u0398\u039f\u03a5 \u03a3\u03a0\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a3": "\u03a7\u03a1\u03a5\u03a3\u0391\u039d\u0398\u039f\u03a5 \u03a3\u03a0\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a3", "\u0398\u0395\u039c\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u039a\u039b\u0395\u039f\u03a5\u03a3 \u0391\u0392\u03a1\u0391\u0391\u039c": "\u0398\u0395\u039c\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u039a\u039b\u0395\u039f\u03a5\u03a3 \u0391\u0392\u03a1\u0391\u0391\u039c", "\u03a0\u039f\u03a5\u03a1\u0393\u039f\u03a5\u03a1\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3 \u0395\u03a5\u0391\u0393\u0393\u0395\u039b\u039f\u03a3": "\u03a0\u039f\u03a5\u03a1\u0393\u039f\u03a5\u03a1\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3 \u0395\u03a5\u0391\u0393\u0393\u0395\u039b\u039f\u03a3", "\u03a3\u03a0\u0391\u03a1\u039f\u03a3 \u03a6\u039f\u0399\u0392\u039f\u03a3": "\u03a3\u03a0\u0391\u03a1\u039f\u03a3 \u03a6\u039f\u0399\u0392\u039f\u03a3", "\u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u0394\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a5 \u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u0394\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a3": "\u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u0394\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a5 \u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u0394\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1236, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 918, "cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 919, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:37.559729", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.766, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.848, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.795, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.653, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.766, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.808, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.629, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.247, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.795, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.653, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.693, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.693, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.791, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.199, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.199, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1236}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "10e5b2ba76f54ad58fa4a6b991dfa66c", "name": "Cyprus 2019 parliamentary (overnight cyprus_2019_ep.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cyprus", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.cy/sites/default/files/ElectionsResults2019.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u0391\u039a\u0395\u039b - \u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u03a1\u0391 - \u039d\u0395\u0395\u03a3 \u0394\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u039c\u0395\u0399\u03a3": "\u0391\u039a\u0395\u039b - \u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u03a1\u0391 - \u039d\u0395\u0395\u03a3 \u0394\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u039c\u0395\u0399\u03a3", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u03a0\u0391\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0391\u039e\u0397": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u03a0\u0391\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0391\u039e\u0397", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0395\u03a1\u039c\u039f\u03a3": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0395\u03a1\u039c\u039f\u03a3", "\u0395\u0394\u0395\u039a \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u03a3\u039f\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u039b\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u03a9\u039d": "\u0395\u0394\u0395\u039a \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u03a3\u039f\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u039b\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u03a9\u039d", "\u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u039c\u0395\u03a4\u03a9\u03a0\u039f": "\u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u039c\u0395\u03a4\u03a9\u03a0\u039f", "\u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 \u0393\u0399\u0391 \u03a4\u0391 \u0396\u03a9\u0391 \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u03a5": "\u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 \u0393\u0399\u0391 \u03a4\u0391 \u0396\u03a9\u0391 \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u03a5", "\u039f\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u039d\u03a9\u03a3\u0397 \u0391\u0393\u03a9\u039d\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u03a9\u039d \u0394\u0399\u039a\u0391\u0399\u039f\u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0397\u03a3": "\u039f\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u039d\u03a9\u03a3\u0397 \u0391\u0393\u03a9\u039d\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u03a9\u039d \u0394\u0399\u039a\u0391\u0399\u039f\u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0397\u03a3", "\u03a0\u0391\u03a4\u03a1\u0399\u03a9\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391": "\u03a0\u0391\u03a4\u03a1\u0399\u03a9\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391", "\u03a3\u03a5\u039c\u039c\u0391\u03a7\u0399\u0391 - \u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u039f\u0399": "\u03a3\u03a5\u039c\u039c\u0391\u03a7\u0399\u0391 - \u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u039f\u0399", "\u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u0391\u03a0\u0395\u039b\u0395\u03a5\u0398\u0395\u03a1\u03a9\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391": "\u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u0391\u03a0\u0395\u039b\u0395\u03a5\u0398\u0395\u03a1\u03a9\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391", "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u0393\u0399\u0391\u03a3\u0395\u039c\u0399": "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u0393\u0399\u0391\u03a3\u0395\u039c\u0399", "\u03a3\u039f\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u039b\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u03a5": "\u03a3\u039f\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u039b\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u03a5", "\u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u0399\u0394\u039f\u03a5 \u03a7\u0391\u03a1\u0397\u03a3": "\u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u0399\u0394\u039f\u03a5 \u03a7\u0391\u03a1\u0397\u03a3", "\u039c\u0391\u03a1\u0394\u0391\u03a0\u0397\u03a4\u03a4\u0391\u03a3 \u03a7\u03a1\u03a5\u03a3\u0391\u039d\u0398\u039f\u03a3": "\u039c\u0391\u03a1\u0394\u0391\u03a0\u0397\u03a4\u03a4\u0391\u03a3 \u03a7\u03a1\u03a5\u03a3\u0391\u039d\u0398\u039f\u03a3", "\u03a0\u0391\u03a1\u0391\u03a3\u039a\u0395\u03a5\u0391 \u039c\u0399\u03a7\u0391\u039b\u0397\u03a3": "\u03a0\u0391\u03a1\u0391\u03a3\u039a\u0395\u03a5\u0391 \u039c\u0399\u03a7\u0391\u039b\u0397\u03a3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1078, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 807}, "n_stations_flagged": 807, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:34.291323", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.768, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.81, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.84, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.71, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.827, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.181, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.739, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.154, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.154, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Democratic Rally (DISY)", "winner_candidate": "Nicos Anastasiades", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Progressive Party of Working People (AKEL)", "margin": 11.98, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "CYP", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1078}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "76a149918cc84d7eb3c5177c9906496c", "name": "Cyprus 2018 presidential (overnight cyprus_2018_presidential_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cyprus", "year": 2018, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.cy/sites/default/files/Presidential2018_epan.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u0391\u039d\u0391\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u0394\u0397\u03a3": "\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u0391\u039d\u0391\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u0394\u0397\u03a3", "\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a3 \u039c\u0391\u039b\u0391\u03a3": "\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a3 \u039c\u0391\u039b\u0391\u03a3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1122, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1121, "registered_not_positive": 1122}, "n_stations_flagged": 1122, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:30.936671", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.768, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.81, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.836, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.722, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.827, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.181, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.73, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.73, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.147, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.147, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.917, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Democratic Rally (DISY)", "winner_candidate": "Nicos Anastasiades", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Progressive Party of Working People (AKEL)", "margin": 11.98, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "CYP", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1122}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "99657d7ba8894230a954656ec99df5cb", "name": "Cyprus 2018 presidential (overnight cyprus_2018_presidential_r1.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cyprus", "year": 2018, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.cy/sites/default/files/Presidential2018.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3 \u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u03a4\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039f\u03a5": "\u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3 \u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u03a4\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039f\u03a5", "\u0393\u0399\u03a9\u03a1\u0393\u039f\u03a3 \u039b\u0399\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039a\u0391\u03a3": "\u0393\u0399\u03a9\u03a1\u0393\u039f\u03a3 \u039b\u0399\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039a\u0391\u03a3", "\u039c\u0399\u03a7\u0391\u0397\u039b \u039c\u0397\u039d\u0391": "\u039c\u0399\u03a7\u0391\u0397\u039b \u039c\u0397\u039d\u0391", "\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u0391\u03a3 \u03a0\u0391\u03a0\u0391\u0394\u039f\u03a0\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a3": "\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u0391\u03a3 \u03a0\u0391\u03a0\u0391\u0394\u039f\u03a0\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a3", "\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u0391\u039d\u0391\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u0394\u0397\u03a3": "\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u0391\u039d\u0391\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u0394\u0397\u03a3", "\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a3 \u039c\u0391\u039b\u0391\u03a3": "\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a3 \u039c\u0391\u039b\u0391\u03a3", "\u03a7\u0391\u03a1\u0397\u03a3 \u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u0399\u0394\u039f\u03a5": "\u03a7\u0391\u03a1\u0397\u03a3 \u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u0399\u0394\u039f\u03a5", "\u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u039a\u0397\u03a3 \u039a\u0391\u03a0\u0397\u039b\u0399\u03a9\u03a4\u0397\u03a3": "\u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u039a\u0397\u03a3 \u039a\u0391\u03a0\u0397\u039b\u0399\u03a9\u03a4\u0397\u03a3", "\u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a3 \u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a5": "\u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a3 \u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a5"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1122, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1121, "registered_not_positive": 1122}, "n_stations_flagged": 1122, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:27.706055", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.768, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.81, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.836, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.722, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.827, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.181, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.73, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.73, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.147, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.147, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.917, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Democratic Rally (DISY)", "winner_candidate": "Nicos Anastasiades", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Progressive Party of Working People (AKEL)", "margin": 11.98, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "CYP", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1122}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7ab5f52a7d86485ea4698a98bd3d5f49", "name": "Cyprus 2016 parliamentary (overnight cyprus_2016_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cyprus", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.cy/sites/default/files/Parliamentary2016.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u0391\u0393\u0393\u0395\u039b\u0397 \u0391\u039d\u03a4\u03a9\u039d\u0397\u03a3": "\u0391\u0393\u0393\u0395\u039b\u0397 \u0391\u039d\u03a4\u03a9\u039d\u0397\u03a3", "\u0391\u039a\u0395\u039b - \u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u03a1\u0391 \u039d\u0395\u0395\u03a3 \u0394\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u039c\u0395\u0399\u03a3": "\u0391\u039a\u0395\u039b - \u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u03a1\u0391 \u039d\u0395\u0395\u03a3 \u0394\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u039c\u0395\u0399\u03a3", "\u0391\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039b\u0395\u0393\u0393\u03a5\u0397": "\u0391\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039b\u0395\u0393\u0393\u03a5\u0397", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 (\u0394\u0397.\u039a\u039f)": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 (\u0394\u0397.\u039a\u039f)", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0395\u03a1\u039c\u039f\u03a3 (\u0394\u0397.\u03a3\u03a5)": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0395\u03a1\u039c\u039f\u03a3 (\u0394\u0397.\u03a3\u03a5)", "\u0395\u0394\u0395\u039a \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u03a3\u039f\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u039b\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u03a9\u039d": "\u0395\u0394\u0395\u039a \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u03a3\u039f\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u039b\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u03a9\u039d", "\u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u039c\u0395\u03a4\u03a9\u03a0\u039f ( \u0395.\u039b\u0391.\u039c)": "\u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u039c\u0395\u03a4\u03a9\u03a0\u039f ( \u0395.\u039b\u0391.\u039c)", "\u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u03a4\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039f\u03a5 \u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3": "\u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u03a4\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039f\u03a5 \u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3", "\u0398\u0395\u039f\u0394\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a5 \u0398\u0395\u039f\u0394\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a3": "\u0398\u0395\u039f\u0394\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a5 \u0398\u0395\u039f\u0394\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a3", "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u03a9\u039d - \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0395\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u0391 \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u03a9\u039d": "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u03a9\u039d - \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0395\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u0391 \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u03a9\u039d", "\u039a\u039f\u0399\u039d\u03a9\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u03a3\u0397\u039c\u0391\u0399\u0391": "\u039a\u039f\u0399\u039d\u03a9\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u03a3\u0397\u039c\u0391\u0399\u0391", "\u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 \u0393\u0399\u0391 \u03a4\u0391 \u0396\u03a9\u0391 \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u03a5": "\u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 \u0393\u0399\u0391 \u03a4\u0391 \u0396\u03a9\u0391 \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u03a5", "\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0399 \u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u039d \u0391\u0393\u03a9\u039d\u0391": "\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0399 \u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u039d \u0391\u0393\u03a9\u039d\u0391", "\u039f\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u039d\u03a9\u03a3\u0397 \u0391\u0393\u03a9\u039d\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u03a9\u039d \u0394\u0399\u039a\u0391\u0399\u039f\u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0397\u03a3 (\u039f.\u0391.\u0394)": "\u039f\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u039d\u03a9\u03a3\u0397 \u0391\u0393\u03a9\u039d\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u03a9\u039d \u0394\u0399\u039a\u0391\u0399\u039f\u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0397\u03a3 (\u039f.\u0391.\u0394)", "\u03a0\u039d\u039f\u0397 \u039b\u0391\u039f\u03a5": "\u03a0\u039d\u039f\u0397 \u039b\u0391\u039f\u03a5", "\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a5 \u039b\u039f\u03a5\u039a\u0391\u03a3": "\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a5 \u039b\u039f\u03a5\u039a\u0391\u03a3", "\u03a3\u03a5\u039c\u039c\u0391\u03a7\u0399\u0391 \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u03a9\u039d": "\u03a3\u03a5\u039c\u039c\u0391\u03a7\u0399\u0391 \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u03a9\u039d", "\u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a6\u039f\u03a1\u039f\u03a5 \u0393\u0395\u03a9\u03a1\u0393\u0399\u039f\u03a3": "\u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a6\u039f\u03a1\u039f\u03a5 \u0393\u0395\u03a9\u03a1\u0393\u0399\u039f\u03a3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1213, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1204, "registered_not_positive": 1213}, "n_stations_flagged": 1213, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:23.755342", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.774, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.819, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.851, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.739, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.828, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.46, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.739, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.743, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.872, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.14, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.14, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.935, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1213}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "90d9275e7e3b49b5b7b883b237ea3afb", "name": "Cyprus 2014 parliamentary (overnight cyprus_2014_ep.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cyprus", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.cy/sites/default/files/%CE%91%CF%80%CE%BF%CF%84%CE%B5%CE%BB%CE%B5%CF%83%CE%BC%CE%B1%CF%84%CE%B1%20%CE%95%CF%85%CF%81%CF%89%CE%B5%CE%BA%CE%BB%CE%BF%CE%B3%CF%89%CE%BD%20%202014_0.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u0391\u039a\u0395\u039b - \u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u03a1\u0391 - \u039d\u0395\u0395\u03a3 \u0394\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u039c\u0395\u0399\u03a3": "\u0391\u039a\u0395\u039b - \u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u03a1\u0391 - \u039d\u0395\u0395\u03a3 \u0394\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u039c\u0395\u0399\u03a3", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0395\u03a1\u039c\u039f\u03a3": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0395\u03a1\u039c\u039f\u03a3", "\u0394\u03a1\u0391\u03a3\u03a5 -  EYLEM": "\u0394\u03a1\u0391\u03a3\u03a5 -  EYLEM", "\u0395\u0394\u0395\u039a - \u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u039f\u0399": "\u0395\u0394\u0395\u039a - \u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u039f\u0399", "\u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u039c\u0395\u03a4\u03a9\u03a0\u039f (\u0395.\u039b\u0391.\u039c)": "\u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u039c\u0395\u03a4\u03a9\u03a0\u039f (\u0395.\u039b\u0391.\u039c)", "\u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u03a4\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039f\u03a5 \u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3": "\u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u03a4\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039f\u03a5 \u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3", "\u0398\u0395\u039f\u0394\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a5 \u0398\u0395\u039f\u0394\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a3": "\u0398\u0395\u039f\u0394\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a5 \u0398\u0395\u039f\u0394\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a3", "\u0399\u03a9\u0391\u039d\u039d\u039f\u03a5 \u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3": "\u0399\u03a9\u0391\u039d\u039d\u039f\u03a5 \u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3", "\u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 \u0393\u0399\u0391 \u03a4\u0391 \u0396\u03a9\u0391 \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u03a5": "\u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 \u0393\u0399\u0391 \u03a4\u0391 \u0396\u03a9\u0391 \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u03a5", "\u039a\u03a5\u03a1\u0399\u0391\u039a\u039fY \u039a\u03a9\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3 (\u039f\u03a5\u03a4\u039f\u03a0\u039f\u03a3)": "\u039a\u03a5\u03a1\u0399\u0391\u039a\u039fY \u039a\u03a9\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3 (\u039f\u03a5\u03a4\u039f\u03a0\u039f\u03a3)", "\u039b\u0395\u0392\u0395\u039d\u03a4 \u03a3\u0395\u039d\u0395\u03a1": "\u039b\u0395\u0392\u0395\u039d\u03a4 \u03a3\u0395\u039d\u0395\u03a1", "\u039c\u0397\u039d\u0391\u03a3 \u039c\u0399\u03a7\u0391\u039b\u0397\u03a3": "\u039c\u0397\u039d\u0391\u03a3 \u039c\u0399\u03a7\u0391\u039b\u0397\u03a3", "\u039c\u0397\u039d\u03a5\u039c\u0391 \u0395\u039b\u03a0\u0399\u0394\u0391\u03a3": "\u039c\u0397\u039d\u03a5\u039c\u0391 \u0395\u039b\u03a0\u0399\u0394\u0391\u03a3", "\u03a3\u039f\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u039b\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u03a5": "\u03a3\u039f\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u039b\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 \u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u03a5", "\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a5 \u039b\u039f\u03a5\u039a\u0391\u03a3": "\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a5 \u039b\u039f\u03a5\u039a\u0391\u03a3", "\u03a3\u03a5\u039c\u039c\u0391\u03a7\u0399\u0391 \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u03a9\u039d": "\u03a3\u03a5\u039c\u039c\u0391\u03a7\u0399\u0391 \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u03a9\u039d", "\u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a6\u039f\u03a1\u039f\u03a5 \u0391\u0394\u0391\u039c\u039f\u03a3": "\u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a6\u039f\u03a1\u039f\u03a5 \u0391\u0394\u0391\u039c\u039f\u03a3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1087, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1087, "cast_gt_registered": 1048}, "n_stations_flagged": 1087, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:20.293862", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.773, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.821, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.733, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.773, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.629, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.872, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.142, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.142, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "DISY", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "AKEL", "margin": 14.97, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "CYP", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1087}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5332db4ba8d84a8c9206e64700a02eef", "name": "Cyprus 2013 presidential (overnight cyprus_2013_presidential_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cyprus", "year": 2013, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.cy/sites/default/files/Presidential2013_epan.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u0391\u039d\u0391\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u0394\u0397\u03a3": "\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u0391\u039d\u0391\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u0394\u0397\u03a3", "\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a3 \u039c\u0391\u039b\u0391\u03a3": "\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a3 \u039c\u0391\u039b\u0391\u03a3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1139, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1138, "registered_not_positive": 1139}, "n_stations_flagged": 1139, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:16.483549", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.773, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.821, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.847, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.732, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.773, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.629, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.872, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.137, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.137, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "DISY", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "AKEL", "margin": 14.97, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "CYP", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1139}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "73e0408c1b2c453bbd00cf984ae47d64", "name": "Cyprus 2013 presidential (overnight cyprus_2013_presidential_r1.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cyprus", "year": 2013, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.cy/sites/default/files/Presidential2013.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3 \u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u03a4\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039f\u03a5": "\u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3 \u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u03a4\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039f\u03a5", "\u0393\u0395\u03a9\u03a1\u0393\u0399\u039f\u03a3 \u03a7\u0391\u03a1\u0391\u039b\u0391\u039c\u03a0\u039f\u03a5\u03a3": "\u0393\u0395\u03a9\u03a1\u0393\u0399\u039f\u03a3 \u03a7\u0391\u03a1\u0391\u039b\u0391\u039c\u03a0\u039f\u03a5\u03a3", "\u0393\u0399\u03a9\u03a1\u0393\u039f\u03a3 \u039b\u0399\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039a\u0391\u03a3": "\u0393\u0399\u03a9\u03a1\u0393\u039f\u03a3 \u039b\u0399\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039a\u0391\u03a3", "\u039a\u03a9\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3 \u039a\u03a5\u03a1\u0399\u0391\u039a\u039f\u03a5(\u039f\u03a5\u03a4\u039f\u03a0\u039f\u03a3)": "\u039a\u03a9\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3 \u039a\u03a5\u03a1\u0399\u0391\u039a\u039f\u03a5(\u039f\u03a5\u03a4\u039f\u03a0\u039f\u03a3)", "\u039b\u0391\u039a\u0397\u03a3 \u0399\u03a9\u0391\u039d\u039d\u039f\u03a5": "\u039b\u0391\u039a\u0397\u03a3 \u0399\u03a9\u0391\u039d\u039d\u039f\u03a5", "\u039b\u039f\u03a5\u039a\u0391\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a5": "\u039b\u039f\u03a5\u039a\u0391\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a5", "\u039c\u0391\u039a\u0391\u03a1\u0399\u0391 \u0391\u039d\u03a4\u03a1\u0397 \u03a3\u03a4\u03a5\u039b\u0399\u0391\u039d\u039f\u03a5": "\u039c\u0391\u039a\u0391\u03a1\u0399\u0391 \u0391\u039d\u03a4\u03a1\u0397 \u03a3\u03a4\u03a5\u039b\u0399\u0391\u039d\u039f\u03a5", "\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u0391\u039d\u0391\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u0394\u0397\u03a3": "\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u0391\u039d\u0391\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u0394\u0397\u03a3", "\u03a0\u03a1\u0391\u039e\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u0391 \u0391\u039d\u03a4\u03a9\u039d\u0399\u0391\u0394\u039f\u03a5 \u039a\u03a5\u03a1\u0399\u0391\u039a\u039f\u03a5": "\u03a0\u03a1\u0391\u039e\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u0391 \u0391\u039d\u03a4\u03a9\u039d\u0399\u0391\u0394\u039f\u03a5 \u039a\u03a5\u03a1\u0399\u0391\u039a\u039f\u03a5", "\u03a3\u039f\u039b\u03a9\u039d \u0393\u03a1\u0397\u0393\u039f\u03a1\u0399\u039f\u03a5": "\u03a3\u039f\u039b\u03a9\u039d \u0393\u03a1\u0397\u0393\u039f\u03a1\u0399\u039f\u03a5", "\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a3 \u039c\u0391\u039b\u0391\u03a3": "\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a3 \u039c\u0391\u039b\u0391\u03a3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1139, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1138, "registered_not_positive": 1139}, "n_stations_flagged": 1139, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:12.853547", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.773, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.821, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.847, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.732, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.773, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.629, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.872, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.137, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.137, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "DISY", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "AKEL", "margin": 14.97, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "CYP", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1139}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "345c46f42edc4979b86b6f0be7d2b977", "name": "Cyprus 2011 parliamentary (overnight cyprus_2011_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cyprus", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.cy/sites/default/files/Parliamentary2011.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u0391\u039a\u0395\u039b-\u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u03a1\u0391-\u039d\u0395\u0395\u03a3 \u0394\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u039c\u0395\u0399\u03a3": "\u0391\u039a\u0395\u039b-\u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u03a1\u0391-\u039d\u0395\u0395\u03a3 \u0394\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u039c\u0395\u0399\u03a3", "\u0393\u03a1\u0391\u03a6\u0395\u0399\u039f \u0394\u0399\u039a\u0391\u0399\u03a9\u039c\u0391\u03a4\u03a9\u039d \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u0397 \u039b\u0391.\u03a3\u039f.\u039a": "\u0393\u03a1\u0391\u03a6\u0395\u0399\u039f \u0394\u0399\u039a\u0391\u0399\u03a9\u039c\u0391\u03a4\u03a9\u039d \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u0397 \u039b\u0391.\u03a3\u039f.\u039a", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 (\u0394\u0397.\u039a\u039f)": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 (\u0394\u0397.\u039a\u039f)", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0395\u03a1\u039c\u039f\u03a3 (\u0394\u0397.\u03a3\u03a5)": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0395\u03a1\u039c\u039f\u03a3 (\u0394\u0397.\u03a3\u03a5)", "\u0395\u0394\u0395\u039a \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u03a3\u039f\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u039b\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u03a9\u039d": "\u0395\u0394\u0395\u039a \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u03a3\u039f\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u039b\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u03a9\u039d", "\u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u039c\u0395\u03a4\u03a9\u03a0\u039f (\u0395.\u039b\u0391.\u039c)": "\u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u039c\u0395\u03a4\u03a9\u03a0\u039f (\u0395.\u039b\u0391.\u039c)", "\u0395\u03a5\u03a1\u03a9\u03a0\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 (\u0395\u03a5\u03a1\u03a9.\u039a\u039f)": "\u0395\u03a5\u03a1\u03a9\u03a0\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 (\u0395\u03a5\u03a1\u03a9.\u039a\u039f)", "\u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u03a4\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039f\u03a5 \u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3": "\u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u03a4\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039f\u03a5 \u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3", "\u0396\u03a5\u0393\u039f\u03a3 \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u0391\u039d\u0395\u039e\u0391\u03a1\u03a4\u0397\u03a4\u03a9\u039d \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u03a9\u039d": "\u0396\u03a5\u0393\u039f\u03a3 \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u0391\u039d\u0395\u039e\u0391\u03a1\u03a4\u0397\u03a4\u03a9\u039d \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u03a9\u039d", "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u03a9\u039d \u03a0\u0395\u03a1\u0399\u0392\u0391\u039b\u039b\u039f\u039d\u03a4\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u03a9\u039d": "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u03a9\u039d \u03a0\u0395\u03a1\u0399\u0392\u0391\u039b\u039b\u039f\u039d\u03a4\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u03a9\u039d", "\u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u0399\u0391\u039a\u0397 \u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u039f\u0394\u0395\u03a5\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0395\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u0391 (\u039a\u03a5.\u03a0\u03a1\u039f.\u03a3)": "\u039a\u03a5\u03a0\u03a1\u0399\u0391\u039a\u0397 \u03a0\u03a1\u039f\u039f\u0394\u0395\u03a5\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0395\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u0391 (\u039a\u03a5.\u03a0\u03a1\u039f.\u03a3)", "\u039a\u03a5\u03a1\u0399\u0391\u039a\u039f\u03a5 (\u039f\u03a5\u03a4\u039f\u03a0\u039f\u03a3) \u039a\u03a9\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3": "\u039a\u03a5\u03a1\u0399\u0391\u039a\u039f\u03a5 (\u039f\u03a5\u03a4\u039f\u03a0\u039f\u03a3) \u039a\u03a9\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3", "\u039a\u03a9\u039d\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u039d\u03a4\u0399\u039d\u039f\u03a5 \u039d\u0395\u039f\u03a6\u03a5\u03a4\u039f\u03a3": "\u039a\u03a9\u039d\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u039d\u03a4\u0399\u039d\u039f\u03a5 \u039d\u0395\u039f\u03a6\u03a5\u03a4\u039f\u03a3", "\u03a0\u0399\u0395\u03a1\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3 \u0391\u039d\u03a4\u03a9\u039d\u0397\u03a3": "\u03a0\u0399\u0395\u03a1\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3 \u0391\u039d\u03a4\u03a9\u039d\u0397\u03a3", "\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a5 \u039b\u039f\u03a5\u039a\u0391\u03a3": "\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a5 \u039b\u039f\u03a5\u039a\u0391\u03a3", "\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a5 \u03a0\u0391\u039c\u03a0\u039f\u03a3": "\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u03a5 \u03a0\u0391\u039c\u03a0\u039f\u03a3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1268, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1268, "cast_gt_registered": 1262}, "n_stations_flagged": 1268, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:08.620877", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.781, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.765, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.845, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.734, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.837, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.656, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.135, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.132, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.132, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1268}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4f18d88cafc047fd8477783c7161e1a7", "name": "Cyprus 2008 presidential (overnight cyprus_2008_presidential_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cyprus", "year": 2008, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.cy/sites/default/files/Presidential2008_epan.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u0394\u0397\u039c\u0397\u03a4\u03a1\u0397\u03a3 \u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a6\u0399\u0391\u03a3": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u0397\u03a4\u03a1\u0397\u03a3 \u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a6\u0399\u0391\u03a3", "\u0399\u03a9\u0391\u039d\u039d\u0397\u03a3 \u039a\u0391\u03a3\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3": "\u0399\u03a9\u0391\u039d\u039d\u0397\u03a3 \u039a\u0391\u03a3\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1159, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1157, "registered_not_positive": 1159}, "n_stations_flagged": 1159, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:05.166502", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.781, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.779, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.836, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.723, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.779, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.139, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.719, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.135, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.135, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "AKEL", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "DISY", "margin": 6.75, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "CYP", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1159}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4db1bc5bd10747ba95448eb7aafcb243", "name": "Cyprus 2008 presidential (overnight cyprus_2008_presidential_r1.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cyprus", "year": 2008, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.cy/sites/default/files/Presidential2008.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u0391\u039d\u0391\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3\u0397\u03a3 \u039c\u0399\u03a7\u0391\u0397\u039b": "\u0391\u039d\u0391\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3\u0397\u03a3 \u039c\u0399\u03a7\u0391\u0397\u039b", "\u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3 \u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u03a4\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039f\u03a5": "\u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3 \u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u03a4\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039f\u03a5", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u0397\u03a4\u03a1\u0397\u03a3 \u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a6\u0399\u0391\u03a3": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u0397\u03a4\u03a1\u0397\u03a3 \u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a6\u0399\u0391\u03a3", "\u0399\u03a9\u0391\u039d\u039d\u0397\u03a3 \u039a\u0391\u03a3\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3": "\u0399\u03a9\u0391\u039d\u039d\u0397\u03a3 \u039a\u0391\u03a3\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3", "\u039a\u03a9\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3 \u0398\u0395\u039c\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u039a\u039b\u0395\u039f\u03a5\u03a3": "\u039a\u03a9\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3 \u0398\u0395\u039c\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u039a\u039b\u0395\u039f\u03a5\u03a3", "\u039a\u03a9\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3 \u039a\u03a5\u03a1\u0399\u0391\u039a\u039f\u03a5 (\u039f\u03a5\u03a4\u039f\u03a0\u039f\u03a3)": "\u039a\u03a9\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3 \u039a\u03a5\u03a1\u0399\u0391\u039a\u039f\u03a5 (\u039f\u03a5\u03a4\u039f\u03a0\u039f\u03a3)", "\u039c\u0391\u03a1\u0399\u039f\u03a3 \u039c\u0391\u03a4\u03a3\u0391\u039a\u0397\u03a3": "\u039c\u0391\u03a1\u0399\u039f\u03a3 \u039c\u0391\u03a4\u03a3\u0391\u039a\u0397\u03a3", "\u03a4\u0391\u03a3\u03a3\u039f\u03a3 \u03a0\u0391\u03a0\u0391\u0394\u039f\u03a0\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a3": "\u03a4\u0391\u03a3\u03a3\u039f\u03a3 \u03a0\u0391\u03a0\u0391\u0394\u039f\u03a0\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a3", "\u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u0394\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a3 \u039d\u0395\u039f\u03a6\u03a5\u03a4\u039f\u03a5": "\u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u0394\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a3 \u039d\u0395\u039f\u03a6\u03a5\u03a4\u039f\u03a5"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1159, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1157, "registered_not_positive": 1159}, "n_stations_flagged": 1159, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:41:01.449837", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.781, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.779, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.836, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.723, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.779, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.139, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.719, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.135, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.135, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "AKEL", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "DISY", "margin": 6.75, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "CYP", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1159}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "77dd0a6c52c0495ea4d6561088d59b07", "name": "Cyprus 2006 parliamentary (overnight cyprus_2006_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cyprus", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.cy/sites/default/files/Parliamentary2006.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u0391\u039a\u0395\u039b-\u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u03a1\u0391 \u039d\u0395\u0395\u03a3 \u0394\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u039c\u0395\u0399\u03a3": "\u0391\u039a\u0395\u039b-\u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u03a1\u0391 \u039d\u0395\u0395\u03a3 \u0394\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u039c\u0395\u0399\u03a3", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0395\u03a1\u039c\u039f\u03a3": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0395\u03a1\u039c\u039f\u03a3", "\u0395\u0394\u0395\u039a \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u03a3\u039f\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u039b\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u03a9\u039d": "\u0395\u0394\u0395\u039a \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u03a3\u039f\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u039b\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u03a9\u039d", "\u0395\u039d\u03a9\u039c\u0395\u039d\u039f\u0399 \u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0395\u03a3": "\u0395\u039d\u03a9\u039c\u0395\u039d\u039f\u0399 \u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0395\u03a3", "\u0395\u03a5\u03a1\u03a9\u03a0\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u0397 \u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u0391": "\u0395\u03a5\u03a1\u03a9\u03a0\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u0397 \u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u0391", "\u0395\u03a5\u03a1\u03a9\u03a0\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391": "\u0395\u03a5\u03a1\u03a9\u03a0\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391", "\u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u03a4\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039f\u03a5 \u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3": "\u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u03a4\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039f\u03a5 \u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3", "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u0395\u039b\u0395\u03a5\u0398\u0395\u03a1\u039f\u0399 \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u0395\u03a3": "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u0395\u039b\u0395\u03a5\u0398\u0395\u03a1\u039f\u0399 \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u0395\u03a3", "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u03a9\u039d \u03a0\u0395\u03a1\u0399\u0392\u0391\u039b\u039b\u039f\u039d\u03a4\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u03a9\u039d": "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u03a9\u039d \u03a0\u0395\u03a1\u0399\u0392\u0391\u039b\u039b\u039f\u039d\u03a4\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u03a9\u039d", "\u039a\u03a5\u03a1\u0399\u0391\u039a\u039f\u03a5(\u039f\u03a5\u03a4\u039f\u03a0\u039f\u03a3) \u039a\u03a9\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3": "\u039a\u03a5\u03a1\u0399\u0391\u039a\u039f\u03a5(\u039f\u03a5\u03a4\u039f\u03a0\u039f\u03a3) \u039a\u03a9\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3", "\u039a\u03a9\u039d\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u039d\u03a4\u0399\u039d\u039f\u03a5 \u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3": "\u039a\u03a9\u039d\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u039d\u03a4\u0399\u039d\u039f\u03a5 \u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3", "\u039a\u03a9\u039d\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u039d\u03a4\u0399\u039d\u039f\u03a5 \u039c\u0391\u03a1\u0399\u039f\u03a3": "\u039a\u03a9\u039d\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u039d\u03a4\u0399\u039d\u039f\u03a5 \u039c\u0391\u03a1\u0399\u039f\u03a3", "\u039a\u03a9\u03a3\u03a4\u0391 \u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u039a\u0397\u03a3": "\u039a\u03a9\u03a3\u03a4\u0391 \u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u039a\u0397\u03a3", "\u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u03a3\u039f\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u039b\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391": "\u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u03a3\u039f\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u039b\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391", "\u039c\u0399\u03a7\u0391\u0397\u039b \u0391\u039d\u0391\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3\u0397\u03a3": "\u039c\u0399\u03a7\u0391\u0397\u039b \u0391\u039d\u0391\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3\u0397\u03a3", "\u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u039a\u03a5\u039d\u0397\u0393\u03a9\u039d": "\u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u039a\u03a5\u039d\u0397\u0393\u03a9\u039d"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1254, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1248, "registered_not_positive": 1254}, "n_stations_flagged": 1254, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:57.735083", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.777, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.776, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.834, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.713, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.777, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.776, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.836, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.652, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.716, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.14, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.14, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1254}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1d873651286941c8aabb00075e5f8cb3", "name": "Cyprus 2003 presidential (overnight cyprus_2003_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cyprus", "year": 2003, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.cy/sites/default/files/Presidential2003.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u0391\u0394\u0391\u039c\u039f\u03a3 \u039a\u0391\u03a4\u03a3\u0391\u039d\u03a4\u03a9\u039d\u0397\u03a3": "\u0391\u0394\u0391\u039c\u039f\u03a3 \u039a\u0391\u03a4\u03a3\u0391\u039d\u03a4\u03a9\u039d\u0397\u03a3", "\u0391\u039b\u0395\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u039c\u0391\u03a1\u039a\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3": "\u0391\u039b\u0395\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u039c\u0391\u03a1\u039a\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3", "\u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3 \u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u03a4\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039f\u03a5": "\u0391\u039d\u0394\u03a1\u0395\u0391\u03a3 \u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u03a4\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039f\u03a5", "\u0393\u0395\u03a9\u03a1\u0393\u0399\u039f\u03a3 \u039c\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u0393\u0395\u039d\u0397\u03a3": "\u0393\u0395\u03a9\u03a1\u0393\u0399\u039f\u03a3 \u039c\u0391\u03a5\u03a1\u039f\u0393\u0395\u039d\u0397\u03a3", "\u0393\u039b\u0391\u03a5\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u039a\u039b\u0397\u03a1\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3": "\u0393\u039b\u0391\u03a5\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u039a\u039b\u0397\u03a1\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3", "\u039a\u03a9\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3 \u039a\u03a5\u03a1\u0399\u0391\u039a\u039f\u03a5": "\u039a\u03a9\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3 \u039a\u03a5\u03a1\u0399\u0391\u039a\u039f\u03a5", "\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u039a\u039f\u03a5\u03a4\u03a3\u039f\u03a5": "\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u039a\u039f\u03a5\u03a4\u03a3\u039f\u03a5", "\u03a0\u0391\u039d\u03a4\u0395\u039b\u0397\u03a3 \u03a3\u039f\u03a6\u039f\u039a\u039b\u0395\u039f\u03a5\u03a3": "\u03a0\u0391\u039d\u03a4\u0395\u039b\u0397\u03a3 \u03a3\u039f\u03a6\u039f\u039a\u039b\u0395\u039f\u03a5\u03a3", "\u03a4\u0391\u03a3\u03a3\u039f\u03a3 \u03a0\u0391\u03a0\u0391\u0394\u039f\u03a0\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a3": "\u03a4\u0391\u03a3\u03a3\u039f\u03a3 \u03a0\u0391\u03a0\u0391\u0394\u039f\u03a0\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a3", "\u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a3 \u0399\u03a9\u03a3\u0397\u03a6\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3": "\u03a7\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u03a3 \u0399\u03a9\u03a3\u0397\u03a6\u0399\u0394\u0397\u03a3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1078, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1076, "registered_not_positive": 1078}, "n_stations_flagged": 1078, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:54.273740", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.664, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.669, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.805, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.668, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.664, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.776, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.546, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.211, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.668, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.184, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "AKEL/DIKO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "DISY", "margin": 13.11, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "CYP", "year": 2003, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1078}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "267f11597ede44aa9be467cb4acf9b0d", "name": "Curacao 2017 parliamentary (overnight cw_2017_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Curacao", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/CW/CW.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"mfk": "mfk", "ps": "ps", "man": "man", "par": "par", "pnp": "pnp", "pin": "pin", "fol-pan": "fol-pan", "kdnt": "kdnt", "ukh": "ukh", "mkp": "mkp", "mp": "mp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 107, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:13.248479", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 107}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "80a1c43d974449f99b114430b267c566", "name": "Curacao 2016 parliamentary (overnight cw_2016_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Curacao", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/CW/CW.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"mfk": "mfk", "ps": "ps", "man": "man", "par": "par", "dp": "dp", "pais": "pais", "pnp": "pnp", "kdnt": "kdnt", "ukh": "ukh", "mkp": "mkp", "mp": "mp", "pas": "pas", "pro-k": "pro-k"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 107, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:12.830100", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 107}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f5613f115cae440f9edb037b3cd774b9", "name": "Curacao 2012 parliamentary (overnight cw_2012_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Curacao", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/CW/CW.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"mfk": "mfk", "fol": "fol", "ps": "ps", "man": "man", "par": "par", "dp-l": "dp-l", "pais": "pais", "pnp": "pnp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 106, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1, "cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:12.438627", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 106}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d687ff194790458eb388a16beff01b0d", "name": "Curacao 2010 parliamentary (overnight cw_2010_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Curacao", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/CW/CW.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"mfk": "mfk", "fol": "fol", "ps": "ps", "man": "man", "par": "par", "dp": "dp", "pais": "pais", "pnp": "pnp", "plkp": "plkp", "npa": "npa"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 106, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1, "cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:12.070602", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 106}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "02bb4b445949442584d53a6e4d4e14c4", "name": "Curacao 2007 parliamentary (overnight cw_2007_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Curacao", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/CW/CW.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"fol": "fol", "ps": "ps", "man": "man", "par": "par", "dp": "dp", "pnp": "pnp", "plkp": "plkp", "npa": "npa", "msl": "msl", "upn": "upn", "fk": "fk"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 106, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:11.669742", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 106}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "adbbe6e2fac24753b932a199fe05cb74", "name": "Curacao 2003 parliamentary (overnight cw_2003_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Curacao", "year": 2003, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/CW/CW.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"fol": "fol", "man": "man", "par": "par", "dp": "dp", "pnp": "pnp", "plkp": "plkp", "npa": "npa", "ordu": "ordu"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 106, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 106, "registered_not_positive": 106}, "n_stations_flagged": 106, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:11.276674", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 106}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1d1a75a7d9af402b93e79cfce3b42c83", "name": "Cape Verde 2016 parliamentary (overnight cv_2016_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cape Verde", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/CV/CV.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"mpd": "mpd", "paicv": "paicv", "ucid": "ucid", "psd": "psd", "pts": "pts", "pp": "pp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:11.135852", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.887, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.94, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.8, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.713, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.982, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.091, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.773, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.068, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.472, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.637, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.637, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.921, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.207, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.207, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Movement for Democracy (MpD)", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent candidate (Albertino Gra\u00e7a)", "margin": 51.57, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "CPV", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 13}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "79c03f08944e42bbb4d776a5f0b880b6", "name": "Cape Verde 2011 parliamentary (overnight cv_2011_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cape Verde", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/CV/CV.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"mpd": "mpd", "paicv": "paicv", "ucid": "ucid", "psd": "psd", "pts": "pts"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:10.963353", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.779, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.947, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.788, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.702, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.779, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.947, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.872, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.969, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.091, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.773, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.802, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.451, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.788, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.702, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.188, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.188, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Movement for Democracy (MpD)", "winner_candidate": "J. Carlos Fonseca", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "African Party of Independence of Cape Verde (PAICV)", "margin": 8.53, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "CPV", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 13}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f884131964a742e1a1753b8fb18dc44d", "name": "Cape Verde 2006 parliamentary (overnight cv_2006_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cape Verde", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/CV/CV.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"mpd": "mpd", "paicv": "paicv", "ucid": "ucid", "psd": "psd", "prd": "prd"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:10.788909", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.779, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.946, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.778, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.693, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.779, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.984, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.801, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.454, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.693, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.693, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.619, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.207, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.207, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "African Party of Independence of Cape Verde (PAICV)", "winner_candidate": "P. Pires", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Movement for Democracy (MpD)", "margin": 1.96, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "CPV", "year": 2006, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 20}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6cc16a89b38249cc871c48612d1e3f81", "name": "Cape Verde 2001 parliamentary (overnight cv_2001_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cape Verde", "year": 2001, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/CV/CV.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"mpd": "mpd", "paicv": "paicv", "psd": "psd", "prd": "prd", "adm": "adm"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:10.629166", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.716, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.921, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.762, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.677, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.716, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.801, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.351, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.338, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.591, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.207, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.207, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "African Party of Independence of Cape Verde (PAICV)", "winner_candidate": "P. Pires", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Movement for Democracy (MpD)", "margin": 0.01, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "CPV", "year": 2001, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 20}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ecb071c036d542c3b71c03c7ac8c93c4", "name": "Cape Verde 1995 parliamentary (overnight cv_1995_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cape Verde", "year": 1995, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/CV/CV.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"mpd": "mpd", "paicv": "paicv", "ucid": "ucid", "psd": "psd", "pcd": "pcd"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 19, "registered_not_positive": 19}, "n_stations_flagged": 19, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:10.480675", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.709, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.924, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.732, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.649, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.924, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.801, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.34, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 1995, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.649, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.237, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.237, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Movement for Democracy (MpD)", "winner_candidate": "A. Mascarenhas Monteiro", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Against", "margin": 84.2, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "CPV", "year": 1996, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 19}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d8f0a41bb32a449aa1219f0f67834642", "name": "Cook Islands 2014 parliamentary (overnight ck_2014_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cook Islands", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/CK/CK.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cip": "cip", "demo": "demo", "one": "one", "titi": "titi", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 24, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 24, "cast_gt_registered": 23}, "n_stations_flagged": 24, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:10.290630", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 24}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "397eeacec5714724ab6ad302d8d08a19", "name": "Cook Islands 2010 parliamentary (overnight ck_2010_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cook Islands", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/CK/CK.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cip": "cip", "demo": "demo", "tkota": "tkota", "tumu": "tumu", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 24, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:10.100958", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 24}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7a857c7dc75e47d1b5eb67814fd44d0e", "name": "Cook Islands 2006 parliamentary (overnight ck_2006_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cook Islands", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/CK/CK.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cip": "cip", "demo": "demo", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 24, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:09.913290", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 24}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1d355e588e9b4308a4ab8d39ab9267e3", "name": "Ivory Coast 2016 parliamentary (overnight ci_2016_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cote d'Ivoire", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/CI/CI.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cap-udd": "cap-udd", "la": "la", "lider": "lider", "mds": "mds", "mei": "mei", "mnc": "mnc", "pcrci": "pcrci", "pia": "pia", "pidar": "pidar", "prci": "prci", "rdp": "rdp", "rhdp": "rhdp", "udcy": "udcy", "udp": "udp", "udpci": "udpci", "udtci": "udtci", "upci": "upci", "upn": "upn", "usp": "usp", "afd": "afd", "anaci": "anaci", "cdi": "cdi", "cpdl": "cpdl", "cri": "cri", "dlc": "dlc", "fndr": "fndr", "fpi": "fpi", "lcp": "lcp", "mpci": "mpci", "pivert": "pivert", "ppsd": "ppsd", "pupci": "pupci", "rpc": "rpc", "rpp": "rpp", "udl": "udl", "ump": "ump", "upp": "upp", "urd": "urd", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5", "ind6": "ind6", "ind7": "ind7", "ind8": "ind8", "ind9": "ind9"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 205, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:09.209580", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.816, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.746, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.529, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.335, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.746, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.29, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.29, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.323, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.335, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.327, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.327, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.798, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.518, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.518, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.691, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 205}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "28f06778b49b413eaf419d9541c06037", "name": "Belize 2015 parliamentary (overnight bz_2015_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Belize", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BZ/BZ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pup": "pup", "udp": "udp", "bpp": "bpp", "bgip": "bgip", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 31, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:08.924386", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 31}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "af480b5cb91e4bab881ee9109cdc1dab", "name": "Belize 2012 parliamentary (overnight bz_2012_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Belize", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BZ/BZ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pup": "pup", "udp": "udp", "vip": "vip", "pnp": "pnp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 31, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:08.733443", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 31}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6fc580f10b2e4882b3c43d0ebcaca920", "name": "Belize 2008 parliamentary (overnight bz_2008_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Belize", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BZ/BZ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pup": "pup", "udp": "udp", "vip": "vip", "nrp": "nrp", "nba": "nba", "pnp": "pnp", "nrtcp": "nrtcp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 31, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:08.518779", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 31}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a60ebd77ddfb40a1aa63501af0a8e2dd", "name": "Belize 2003 parliamentary (overnight bz_2003_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Belize", "year": 2003, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BZ/BZ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pup": "pup", "udp": "udp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 29, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 21}, "n_stations_flagged": 21, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:08.300336", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 29}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "30b60e4421774c929dc996fa934ca4f8", "name": "Belize 1998 parliamentary (overnight bz_1998_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Belize", "year": 1998, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BZ/BZ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pup": "pup", "udp": "udp", "nabr": "nabr", "pdp": "pdp", "nrtcp": "nrtcp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 29, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 29, "cast_gt_registered": 29}, "n_stations_flagged": 29, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:08.122316", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 29}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bea19500861b4dd5bdd76c16296cc011", "name": "Belize 1993 parliamentary (overnight bz_1993_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Belize", "year": 1993, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BZ/BZ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pup": "pup", "udp": "udp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 29, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:07.932653", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 29}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ae907b78dc394a51b4bfaf3af686cf24", "name": "Belize 1989 parliamentary (overnight bz_1989_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Belize", "year": 1989, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BZ/BZ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pup": "pup", "udp": "udp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 28, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:07.757197", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 28}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "478a4928b19a437cbc13ddb0f960079a", "name": "Belize 1984 parliamentary (overnight bz_1984_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Belize", "year": 1984, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BZ/BZ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pup": "pup", "udp": "udp", "cdp": "cdp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 28, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:07.574731", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 28}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c7ed11ea3c8c405b82b066afc5a8c14c", "name": "Belize 1979 parliamentary (overnight bz_1979_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Belize", "year": 1979, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BZ/BZ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pup": "pup", "udp": "udp", "tpp": "tpp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:07.406533", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1d895d7b24a447d2865f0fd2e163572c", "name": "Belize 1974 parliamentary (overnight bz_1974_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Belize", "year": 1974, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BZ/BZ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pup": "pup", "udp": "udp", "cuf": "cuf", "ubad": "ubad", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:07.248153", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ccef812c7fea4d08bab7566236691e43", "name": "Belize 1969 parliamentary (overnight bz_1969_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Belize", "year": 1969, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BZ/BZ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pup": "pup", "nip": "nip", "nipdm": "nipdm", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:07.090525", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "41ff24eea27d416ca949e6e3aefd115b", "name": "Belize 1965 parliamentary (overnight bz_1965_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Belize", "year": 1965, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BZ/BZ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pup": "pup", "nip": "nip", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:06.930039", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "29bccd1ce04e41d499044f535806fd0c", "name": "Belize 1961 parliamentary (overnight bz_1961_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Belize", "year": 1961, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BZ/BZ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"hip": "hip", "pup": "pup", "nip": "nip", "cdp": "cdp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:06.773365", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e1ac4b21a7494825af3adacbd1218ee1", "name": "Belize 1957 parliamentary (overnight bz_1957_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Belize", "year": 1957, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BZ/BZ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"np": "np", "hip": "hip", "pup": "pup", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 9, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:06.631260", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 9}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "30f6487adfe44ec8a03dc3397b804648", "name": "Belize 1954 parliamentary (overnight bz_1954_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Belize", "year": 1954, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BZ/BZ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"np": "np", "pup": "pup", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 9, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 9, "registered_not_positive": 9}, "n_stations_flagged": 9, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:06.489974", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 9}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "13e6ad9a52af4743840871666706f9d2", "name": "Botswana 2014 parliamentary (overnight bw_2014_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Botswana", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BW/BW.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"bcp": "bcp", "bdp": "bdp", "udc": "udc", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 57, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:06.227345", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.56, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.926, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.61, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.153, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.61, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.513, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.513, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.872, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.14, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.14, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 57}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1a41ea3e9b4747bbb78736749bc03513", "name": "Botswana 2009 parliamentary (overnight bw_2009_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Botswana", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BW/BW.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"bam": "bam", "bcp": "bcp", "bdp": "bdp", "bnf": "bnf", "bpp": "bpp", "btto": "btto", "mels": "mels", "udc": "udc", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 57, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 13, "registered_not_positive": 57, "cast_gt_registered": 57}, "n_stations_flagged": 57, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:05.929982", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.641, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.91, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.712, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.614, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.641, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.037, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.5, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.125, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.146, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.146, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.813, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.813, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 57}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a791ec904a9641e9ab1d02417a091984", "name": "Botswana 2004 parliamentary (overnight bw_2004_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Botswana", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BW/BW.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"bam": "bam", "bcp": "bcp", "bdp": "bdp", "bnf": "bnf", "bpp": "bpp", "mels": "mels", "ndf": "ndf", "udc": "udc", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 57, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 56, "votes_gt_valid": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 56, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:05.646099", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.696, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.785, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.713, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.615, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.696, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.785, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.007, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.37, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.092, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.615, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.511, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.511, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.145, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.145, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 57}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5000b03965db4dc2b7e95f50f162e406", "name": "Botswana 1999 parliamentary (overnight bw_1999_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Botswana", "year": 1999, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BW/BW.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"bam": "bam", "bcp": "bcp", "bdp": "bdp", "bnf": "bnf", "mels": "mels", "udc": "udc", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:05.410577", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.696, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.787, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.703, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.607, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.696, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.991, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.748, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.27, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.365, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.091, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.703, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.475, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.475, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.888, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.138, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.138, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 40}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "db2a556f642b476abb41b504f644cfa3", "name": "Botswana 1994 parliamentary (overnight bw_1994_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Botswana", "year": 1994, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BW/BW.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"bdp": "bdp", "bnf": "bnf", "bpp": "bpp", "ifp": "ifp", "bpu": "bpu", "llb": "llb", "udf": "udf", "blp": "blp", "usp": "usp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 1, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:05.153325", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.702, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.784, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.676, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.58, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.702, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.994, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.64, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.347, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.375, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.094, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.676, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.58, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.58, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.431, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.911, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.138, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.138, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 40}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4f46c193007943968da4369fae5b28e2", "name": "Botswana 1989 parliamentary (overnight bw_1989_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Botswana", "year": 1989, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BW/BW.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"bdp": "bdp", "bnf": "bnf", "bpp": "bpp", "bip": "bip", "bfp": "bfp", "bpu": "bpu", "blp": "blp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 34, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:04.926569", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.711, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.783, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.666, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.563, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.802, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 1989, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.64, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 1989, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 1989, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.372, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.666, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 1989, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.563, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 1989, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.411, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.411, "year": 1989, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.911, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.138, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.138, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 1989, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 34}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "20ceceaa6f0e4334b5dab158970d7d0b", "name": "Botswana 1965 parliamentary (overnight bw_1965_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Botswana", "year": 1965, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BW/BW.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"bdp": "bdp", "bpp": "bpp", "bppm": "bppm", "bip": "bip", "udc": "udc", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 31, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 1, "cast_gt_registered": 28, "registered_not_positive": 31}, "n_stations_flagged": 31, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:04.713936", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.65, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.78, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.271, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.192, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.686, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.337, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.084, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 1965, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.38, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.095, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.271, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.271, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.192, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.192, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.063, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.063, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.451, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.451, "year": 1965, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.046, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.046, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.206, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.206, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 31}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "05892fcbc09341c698a35178b588ead8", "name": "Bahamas 2017 parliamentary (overnight bs_2017_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bahamas", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BS/BS.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"fnm": "fnm", "plp": "plp", "dna": "dna", "bcp": "bcp", "bncp": "bncp", "tpm": "tpm", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 39, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 39, "cast_gt_registered": 39}, "n_stations_flagged": 39, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:04.499677", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 39}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e8ae1a1fc92c424f9df695dcc28dd8ed", "name": "Bahamas 2012 parliamentary (overnight bs_2012_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bahamas", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BS/BS.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"fnm": "fnm", "plp": "plp", "dna": "dna", "bcp": "bcp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 38, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:04.288168", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 38}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "292c8de0c99a4131ad04c47a495820a8", "name": "Bahamas 2007 parliamentary (overnight bs_2007_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bahamas", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BS/BS.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"fnm": "fnm", "plp": "plp", "bdm": "bdm", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 41, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 41, "cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 41, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:04.073752", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 41}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1b7a59a63868416981a4946d8785c6d5", "name": "Bahamas 2002 parliamentary (overnight bs_2002_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bahamas", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BS/BS.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"fnm": "fnm", "plp": "plp", "bcp": "bcp", "bdm": "bdm", "cl": "cl", "ospp": "ospp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:03.858104", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 40}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d94c606eafe14caaab681ab108bc762e", "name": "Bahamas 1997 parliamentary (overnight bs_1997_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bahamas", "year": 1997, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BS/BS.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"fnm": "fnm", "plp": "plp", "ospp": "ospp", "bfa": "bfa", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:03.552408", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 40}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "043b0f88902e44e5932b0e84dd248446", "name": "Bermuda 2017 parliamentary (overnight bm_2017_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bermuda", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BM/BM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"plp1": "plp1", "oba": "oba", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 36, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:03.360376", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 36}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8e6d6d30629f447cbbd9151bf5f45f78", "name": "Bermuda 2012 parliamentary (overnight bm_2012_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bermuda", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BM/BM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"plp1": "plp1", "oba": "oba", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 36, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:03.141180", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 36}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "720729a26faa4f6283a113298254db7f", "name": "Bermuda 2007 parliamentary (overnight bm_2007_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bermuda", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BM/BM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ubp1": "ubp1", "plp1": "plp1", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 36, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:02.940338", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 36}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c3b56e32bcd341f6b6c5c8aa92225942", "name": "Bermuda 2003 parliamentary (overnight bm_2003_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bermuda", "year": 2003, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BM/BM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ubp1": "ubp1", "plp1": "plp1", "nlp1": "nlp1", "glp": "glp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 36, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:02.724516", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 36}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "17dfb3a4a04e4e96b5cf16d927d97095", "name": "Bermuda 1963 parliamentary (overnight bm_1963_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bermuda", "year": 1963, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BM/BM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"plp1": "plp1", "plp2": "plp2", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4", "ind5": "ind5"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 18, "registered_not_positive": 18}, "n_stations_flagged": 18, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:02.556333", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9d93d10665cc40ec906c177c3cbb5a67", "name": "Benin 2011 parliamentary (overnight bj_2011_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Benin", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BJ/BJ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"rdl": "rdl", "upr-fe": "upr-fe", "fcbe": "fcbe", "aa": "aa", "afu": "afu", "pur": "pur", "ac2": "ac2", "mb-lcp": "mb-lcp", "rp": "rp", "fndd": "fndd", "used": "used", "mrdd": "mrdd", "faceen": "faceen", "ub": "ub", "ndc": "ndc", "ag13b": "ag13b", "un": "un", "anc11": "anc11", "anf11": "anf11"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 24, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 24, "cast_valid_mismatch": 24, "registered_not_positive": 24}, "n_stations_flagged": 24, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:02.360924", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.027, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.599, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.486, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.027, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.37, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.343, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.938, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.003, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.501, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.599, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.486, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.486, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.471, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.471, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.663, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.663, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent - Yayi Boni", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "PRD", "margin": 18.44, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "BEN", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 24}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9c2046afad3140509b81bdce25f39e52", "name": "Benin 1991 parliamentary (overnight bj_1991_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Benin", "year": 1991, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BJ/BJ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"utrd": "utrd", "undp": "undp", "udes": "udes", "rdl": "rdl", "psd-unsp": "psd-unsp", "uds": "uds", "rnd": "rnd", "asd-bsd": "asd-bsd", "pnt-urp": "pnt-urp", "prd-pndd": "prd-pndd", "adp-udrs": "adp-udrs", "all1": "all1", "bgld": "bgld", "ncc": "ncc"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 18, "cast_gt_registered": 18}, "n_stations_flagged": 18, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:02.158402", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.153, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.239, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.462, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.361, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.153, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.239, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.489, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.458, "year": 1991, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.473, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 1991, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 1991, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.728, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.432, "year": 1991, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.462, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.462, "year": 1991, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.361, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.361, "year": 1991, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.358, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.358, "year": 1991, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.557, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 1991, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Union for the Triumph of Democratic Renewal", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent - Mathieu Kerekou", "margin": 35.08, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "BEN", "year": 1991, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ef4b554ad3ab4bddbf9dd72c36680529", "name": "Burkina Faso 2015 parliamentary (overnight bf_2015_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Burkina Faso", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BF/BF.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"3p": "3p", "a-f-p": "a-f-p", "a-r-d": "a-r-d", "adefa": "adefa", "adf-rda": "adf-rda", "ajir": "ajir", "ardi": "ardi", "beogo-neere": "beogo-neere", "binidjo": "binidjo", "burkina-yirwa": "burkina-yirwa", "c-d-p": "c-d-p", "c-n": "c-n", "cadeauf": "cadeauf", "ced": "ced", "cmp": "cmp", "co-r-p": "co-r-p", "copac": "copac", "cpr-mp": "cpr-mp", "dt": "dt", "ecoculture": "ecoculture", "f-f-s": "f-f-s", "fp": "fp", "j-c-b": "j-c-b", "l-autre-burkina-psr": "l-autre-burkina-psr", "la-fraternite": "la-fraternite", "le-changement-positif": "le-changement-positif", "le-faso-autrement": "le-faso-autrement", "les-afranchis": "les-afranchis", "lijef": "lijef", "m-d-a": "m-d-a", "m-d-r": "m-d-r", "m-p": "m-p", "m-p-d": "m-p-d", "macenpol": "macenpol", "map": "map", "mdd": "mdd", "mln-bf": "mln-bf", "mpb": "mpb", "mpf": "mpf", "mpp": "mpp", "mpr-b": "mpr-b", "nafa": "nafa", "nds": "nds", "neerwaya": "neerwaya", "nid": "nid", "ntd": "ntd", "o-d-p": "o-d-p", "o-d-t": "o-d-t", "p-c-d-p": "p-c-d-p", "p-d": "p-d", "p-e-d-n": "p-e-d-n", "p-f": "p-f", "p-m-p": "p-m-p", "p-n-d-p": "p-n-d-p", "p-n-d-s": "p-n-d-s", "p-p-d": "p-p-d", "p-p-e-c-n": "p-p-e-c-n", "p-p-l-b": "p-p-l-b", "p-p-p": "p-p-p", "p-p-r-n": "p-p-r-n", "p-r-d-f": "p-r-d-f", "p-r-i-t-lannaya": "p-r-i-t-lannaya", "p-s-u": "p-s-u", "p-u-n-d": "p-u-n-d", "pa-r-i-s": "pa-r-i-s", "pa-re-n": "pa-re-n", "pbl": "pbl", "pcn": "pcn", "pdj": "pdj", "pdp-ps": "pdp-ps", "pds-metba": "pds-metba", "r-d-e-bf": "r-d-e-bf", "r-d-f": "r-d-f", "r-d-l": "r-d-l", "r-d-r": "r-d-r", "r-i-h": "r-i-h", "r-s-r": "r-s-r", "rdpf": "rdpf", "rds": "rds", "recit": "recit", "rfi-pjb": "rfi-pjb", "rid": "rid", "ripit": "ripit", "rpr": "rpr", "soleil-d-afrique": "soleil-d-afrique", "u-f-d-b": "u-f-d-b", "u-m-p": "u-m-p", "u-n-d-p": "u-n-d-p", "u-p-r": "u-p-r", "ubn": "ubn", "udb-r": "udb-r", "uds": "uds", "ufp": "ufp", "undd": "undd", "unic": "unic", "unir-ps": "unir-ps", "upc": "upc", "urdb": "urdb", "urefa": "urefa"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 45, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:01.897146", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.288, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.272, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.376, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.306, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.288, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.272, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.393, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.72, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.356, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.589, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.395, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.376, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.376, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.306, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.264, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.264, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.679, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.679, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.386, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.386, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "People's Movement for Progress (MPP)", "winner_candidate": "Roch Marc Christian Kabor\u00e9", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Union for Progress and Reform (UPC)", "margin": 23.84, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "BFA", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 45}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a82c3596da8b4cf1b80b3de5b1f184a1", "name": "Barbados 2013 parliamentary (overnight bb_2013_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Barbados", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BB/BB.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"blp": "blp", "dlp": "dlp", "pdc": "pdc", "bfp": "bfp", "ndka": "ndka", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 30, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 30, "cast_gt_registered": 30}, "n_stations_flagged": 30, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:01.295397", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.766, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.839, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.781, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.664, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.766, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.839, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.814, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.335, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.217, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.453, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.613, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.664, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.664, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.653, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.097, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.097, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 30}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ef0965a1a8724329b8e3b23d3f71f496", "name": "Barbados 2008 parliamentary (overnight bb_2008_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Barbados", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BB/BB.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"blp": "blp", "dlp": "dlp", "ndp": "ndp", "ppa": "ppa", "pdc": "pdc", "wpb": "wpb", "pep": "pep", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 30, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 30, "cast_gt_registered": 30}, "n_stations_flagged": 30, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:01.075103", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.748, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.843, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.783, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.665, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.748, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.898, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.335, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.217, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.656, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.091, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.091, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 30}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "adab095868e74bec900872b7c0a464f1", "name": "Barbados 2003 parliamentary (overnight bb_2003_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Barbados", "year": 2003, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BB/BB.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"blp": "blp", "dlp": "dlp", "ndp": "ndp", "ppa": "ppa", "pdc": "pdc", "wpb": "wpb", "pep": "pep", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 30, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 30, "cast_gt_registered": 30}, "n_stations_flagged": 30, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:00.864487", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.73, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.589, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.767, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.652, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.647, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.662, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.335, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.217, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.652, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.091, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.091, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 30}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bd061e5ed48141f8b79791c0af7ec37c", "name": "Barbados 1997 parliamentary (overnight bb_1997_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Barbados", "year": 1997, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BB/BB.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"blp": "blp", "dlp": "dlp", "ndp": "ndp", "ppa": "ppa", "pdc": "pdc", "wpb": "wpb", "pep": "pep", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 29, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 29, "registered_not_positive": 1, "cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 29, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:00.660983", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.732, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.584, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.762, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.647, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.732, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.584, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.732, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.655, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.664, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.335, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.217, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.647, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.62, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.62, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.091, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.091, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.888, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 29}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "552e6a360fed4df28bd7db28cff685ce", "name": "Barbados 1994 parliamentary (overnight bb_1994_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Barbados", "year": 1994, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BB/BB.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"blp": "blp", "dlp": "dlp", "ndp": "ndp", "ppa": "ppa", "pdc": "pdc", "wpb": "wpb", "pep": "pep", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 29, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1, "cast_valid_mismatch": 29, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 29, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:00.452399", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.732, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.584, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.762, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.646, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.732, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.584, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.732, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.655, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.664, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.335, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.217, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.62, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.62, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.091, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.091, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.888, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 29}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "99b53c097c37475f968365f296f11e81", "name": "Barbados 1991 parliamentary (overnight bb_1991_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Barbados", "year": 1991, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BB/BB.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"blp": "blp", "dlp": "dlp", "ndp": "ndp", "ppa": "ppa", "pdc": "pdc", "wpb": "wpb", "pep": "pep", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 29, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 29, "registered_not_positive": 1, "cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 29, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:00.267783", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.73, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.571, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.762, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.646, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.74, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.335, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.217, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.698, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.619, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.087, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.087, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.888, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 29}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9168c89b3ff44cec892849ea3ce41449", "name": "Barbados 1986 parliamentary (overnight bb_1986_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Barbados", "year": 1986, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BB/BB.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"blp": "blp", "dlp": "dlp", "ndp": "ndp", "ppa": "ppa", "pdc": "pdc", "wpb": "wpb", "pep": "pep", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 27, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:40:00.072608", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.733, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.572, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.744, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.625, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.733, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.572, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.746, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 1986, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 1986, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.294, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 1986, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.705, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 1986, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.744, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 1986, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 1986, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.601, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.601, "year": 1986, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.903, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.087, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.087, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.877, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 27}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0ac1572ef5234481b1f4ca65665b42d0", "name": "Barbados 1981 parliamentary (overnight bb_1981_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Barbados", "year": 1981, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BB/BB.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"blp": "blp", "dlp": "dlp", "ppa": "ppa", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 27, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 27, "cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 27, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:59.875733", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.729, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.58, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.744, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.629, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.729, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.58, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 1981, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 1981, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.294, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 1981, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.705, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 1981, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.744, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 1981, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.629, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.629, "year": 1981, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.599, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 1981, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.903, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.087, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.087, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.877, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 27}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f17b60067652494988fef6062375cf4c", "name": "Barbados 1976 parliamentary (overnight bb_1976_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Barbados", "year": 1976, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BB/BB.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"blp": "blp", "dlp": "dlp", "ndp": "ndp", "ppa": "ppa", "pdc": "pdc", "wpb": "wpb", "pep": "pep", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 24, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 24}, "n_stations_flagged": 24, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:59.705810", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.735, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.584, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.737, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.622, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.584, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.745, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.294, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.696, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.622, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.595, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.595, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.087, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.087, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 24}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c9c1f131b6124bfe810b8b5308868596", "name": "Barbados 1971 parliamentary (overnight bb_1971_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Barbados", "year": 1971, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BB/BB.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"blp": "blp", "dlp": "dlp", "ppa": "ppa", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 24, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1, "cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:59.499910", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.731, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.561, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.733, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.612, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.731, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.561, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 1971, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 1971, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.294, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 1971, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 1971, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1971, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 1971, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.592, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.592, "year": 1971, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.111, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.111, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 24}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "75dc1b6345e9434a92ffe38af1d1cebe", "name": "Barbados 1966 parliamentary (overnight bb_1966_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Barbados", "year": 1966, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/BB/BB.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"blp": "blp", "dlp": "dlp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 4, "registered_not_positive": 12, "cast_gt_registered": 12}, "n_stations_flagged": 12, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:59.339147", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.725, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.578, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.71, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.579, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.725, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.578, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.746, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 1966, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.622, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 1966, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 1966, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1966, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 1966, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 1966, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.543, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 1966, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.111, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.111, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1966, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 12}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a8f73a747839430fa1eb446d08a3afb4", "name": "Aruba 2017 parliamentary (overnight aw_2017_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Aruba", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AW/AW.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"curpa": "curpa", "mep": "mep", "avp": "avp", "red": "red", "raiz": "raiz", "upp-ppa": "upp-ppa", "por": "por", "mas": "mas"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 65, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 1, "registered_not_positive": 3, "cast_gt_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:59.117708", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 65}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "97a23fef65e44916bb259df1c4279690", "name": "Aruba 2013 parliamentary (overnight aw_2013_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Aruba", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AW/AW.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pdr": "pdr", "ppa": "ppa", "mep": "mep", "avp": "avp", "red": "red", "upp": "upp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 62, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1, "registered_not_positive": 3, "cast_gt_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:58.870392", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 62}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b5efb01694b845f5b994b7b6494bea81", "name": "Aruba 2009 parliamentary (overnight aw_2009_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Aruba", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AW/AW.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"curpa": "curpa", "pdr": "pdr", "ola-msi": "ola-msi", "ppa": "ppa", "mep": "mep", "avp": "avp", "mpa": "mpa", "red": "red"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 60, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:58.634130", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 60}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1067755171e342d38118695d1d1ef698", "name": "Aruba 2005 parliamentary (overnight aw_2005_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Aruba", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AW/AW.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pdr": "pdr", "ola": "ola", "ppa": "ppa", "mep": "mep", "avp": "avp", "mpa": "mpa", "red": "red", "ppt-sb": "ppt-sb", "a-msa": "a-msa"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 53, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 53, "cast_gt_registered": 53}, "n_stations_flagged": 53, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:58.403468", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 53}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9ff4f325a804410a82b2383af2556c0d", "name": "Angola 2017 parliamentary (overnight ao_2017_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Angola", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AO/AO.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"prs": "prs", "fnla": "fnla", "mpla": "mpla", "unita": "unita", "casa-ce": "casa-ce", "apn": "apn"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18, "granularity": "province", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:58.243719", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.858, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.081, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.307, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.139, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.465, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.081, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.492, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.148, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.287, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.718, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.179, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.439, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.36, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.081, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.307, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.307, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.139, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.139, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.111, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.111, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.21, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.21, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.407, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.407, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fbf4b0797c904b6eaf9e298bc96fd3de", "name": "Angola 2012 parliamentary (overnight ao_2012_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Angola", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AO/AO.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"prs": "prs", "fnla": "fnla", "nd": "nd", "mpla": "mpla", "unita": "unita", "casa-ce": "casa-ce", "papod": "papod", "fuma": "fuma", "cpo": "cpo"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18, "granularity": "province", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 18, "cast_gt_registered": 18}, "n_stations_flagged": 18, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:58.080863", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.789, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.909, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.294, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.121, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.789, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.447, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.207, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.342, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.086, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.425, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.356, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.294, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.294, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.121, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.121, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.094, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.094, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.231, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.231, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.366, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.366, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "afeb9e55693e49a9a0ff334cab7a85ab", "name": "Angola 2008 parliamentary (overnight ao_2008_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Angola", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AO/AO.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"prs": "prs", "pld": "pld", "fpd": "fpd", "pdp-ana": "pdp-ana", "ppe": "ppe", "fnla": "fnla", "pajoca": "pajoca", "fofac": "fofac", "nd": "nd", "mpla": "mpla", "unita": "unita", "padepa": "padepa", "prd": "prd", "ad": "ad"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18, "granularity": "province", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:57.898887", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.769, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.899, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.181, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.092, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.769, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.725, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.421, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.221, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.558, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.14, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.34, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.271, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.068, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.181, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.181, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.092, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.092, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.064, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.064, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.48, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.48, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.231, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.231, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.344, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.344, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f30cfa23179d4fb0b475a48cb9db75cc", "name": "Armenia 2012 parliamentary (overnight am_2012_parliamentary_smd.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Armenia", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AM/AM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"arfd": "arfd", "pcl": "pcl", "cpa": "cpa", "dfp": "dfp", "dwp": "dwp", "her": "her", "lib": "lib", "mpa": "mpa", "panm": "panm", "pap": "pap", "pp": "pp", "rep": "rep", "rpa1": "rpa1", "rpa2": "rpa2", "sdhp": "sdhp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 41, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 41}, "n_stations_flagged": 41, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:57.669819", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.046, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.343, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.353, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.201, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.046, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.262, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.343, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.336, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.302, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.576, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.216, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.093, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.345, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.983, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.353, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.353, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.294, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.294, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.21, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.21, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "RPA", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Heritage", "margin": 22.44, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "ARM", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 41}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a232f0dbc0894fb0ab8f95c3a94fcca0", "name": "Armenia 2012 parliamentary (overnight am_2012_parliamentary_pr.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Armenia", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AM/AM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pap": "pap", "her": "her", "ancpa": "ancpa", "arfd": "arfd", "dpa": "dpa", "cpa": "cpa", "rpa": "rpa", "uap": "uap", "pcl": "pcl"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 41, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 41}, "n_stations_flagged": 41, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:57.403563", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.046, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.343, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.353, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.201, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.046, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.262, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.343, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.336, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.302, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.576, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.216, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.093, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.345, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.983, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.353, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.353, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.294, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.294, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.21, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.21, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "RPA", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Heritage", "margin": 22.44, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "ARM", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 41}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2779d8e9b84143ad9b11fb8aa8c6c6da", "name": "Armenia 2007 parliamentary (overnight am_2007_parliamentary_smd.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Armenia", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AM/AM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"arfd": "arfd", "pcl": "pcl", "cpa": "cpa", "dwp": "dwp", "mpa": "mpa", "panm": "panm", "pap": "pap", "pp": "pp", "rpa1": "rpa1", "all": "all", "amp": "amp", "bnd": "bnd", "cdu": "cdu", "cru": "cru", "fsvu": "fsvu", "hay": "hay", "lpp": "lpp", "nup": "nup", "pucp": "pucp", "ypa": "ypa", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3", "ind4": "ind4"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 41, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 41}, "n_stations_flagged": 41, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:57.180866", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.215, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.489, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.347, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.188, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.215, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.304, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.489, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.253, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.161, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.212, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.25, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.965, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.491, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.347, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.347, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.188, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.188, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.288, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.213, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.213, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.567, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.567, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "RPA", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 34.4, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "ARM", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 41}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "47253452383c4fe38d2b872321dc2a38", "name": "Armenia 2007 parliamentary (overnight am_2007_parliamentary_pr.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Armenia", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AM/AM.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pap": "pap", "her": "her", "arfd": "arfd", "dpa": "dpa", "cpa": "cpa", "rpa": "rpa", "pcl": "pcl", "ndp": "ndp", "nap": "nap", "nup": "nup", "all": "all", "pp": "pp", "dwp": "dwp", "ia": "ia", "ypa": "ypa", "ppa": "ppa", "mpa": "mpa", "rep": "rep", "ulp": "ulp", "ulnp": "ulnp", "ntp": "ntp", "sdhp": "sdhp", "cdrp": "cdrp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 41, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 40}, "n_stations_flagged": 40, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:56.908766", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.215, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.489, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.347, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.188, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.215, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.304, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.489, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.253, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.161, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.212, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.25, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.965, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.491, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.347, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.347, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.188, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.188, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.288, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.213, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.213, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.567, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.567, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "RPA", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 34.4, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "ARM", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 41}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a23e44dc454b4b9499c9852e57a335be", "name": "Anguilla 2015 parliamentary (overnight ai_2015_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Anguilla", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AI/AI.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"auf": "auf", "aum": "aum", "ana": "ana", "dove": "dove", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:56.749882", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "98e90170b4fc45b9b2a1613044aa123b", "name": "Anguilla 2010 parliamentary (overnight ai_2010_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Anguilla", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AI/AI.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"auf": "auf", "app": "app", "aum": "aum", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:56.556604", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ff6ee4e393534960a8fcdb7005130074", "name": "Anguilla 2005 parliamentary (overnight ai_2005_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Anguilla", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AI/AI.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"auf": "auf", "app": "app", "aum": "aum", "ansa": "ansa", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 7, "registered_not_positive": 7}, "n_stations_flagged": 7, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:56.440319", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8234b90a35074eedab3d0fda8245521d", "name": "Anguilla 2000 parliamentary (overnight ai_2000_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Anguilla", "year": 2000, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AI/AI.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"aum": "aum", "ana": "ana", "apm": "apm", "mgrd": "mgrd", "adp": "adp", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 7, "registered_not_positive": 7}, "n_stations_flagged": 7, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:56.304149", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "96a479ff891044bbbfc97c4b5c2bb073", "name": "Anguilla 1999 parliamentary (overnight ai_1999_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Anguilla", "year": 1999, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AI/AI.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ana": "ana", "adp": "adp", "aup": "aup", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 7, "cast_gt_registered": 7}, "n_stations_flagged": 7, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:56.178001", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e331b44ad9c04102bd6c1fcb76cab563", "name": "Anguilla 1994 parliamentary (overnight ai_1994_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Anguilla", "year": 1994, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AI/AI.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ana": "ana", "adp": "adp", "aup": "aup", "agg": "agg", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 7, "registered_not_positive": 7}, "n_stations_flagged": 7, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:56.056104", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f5f375112304416c8dcae90bc6f1e121", "name": "Anguilla 1989 parliamentary (overnight ai_1989_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Anguilla", "year": 1989, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AI/AI.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ana": "ana", "adp": "adp", "aup": "aup", "pace": "pace", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 7, "cast_gt_registered": 7}, "n_stations_flagged": 7, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:55.926884", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "06446e44d8874f88b48773869ba58414", "name": "Antigua and Barbuda 2014 parliamentary (overnight ag_2014_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Antigua and Barbuda", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AG/AG.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"alp": "alp", "upp": "upp", "bpm": "bpm", "abtlp": "abtlp", "abpm": "abpm", "mlvop": "mlvop"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:55.780353", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "710775938c6742968daf238c199ac64e", "name": "Antigua and Barbuda 2009 parliamentary (overnight ag_2009_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Antigua and Barbuda", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AG/AG.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"alp": "alp", "upp": "upp", "ond": "ond", "bpm": "bpm", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:55.625900", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f3714590eecd4b1b826ecabea7702235", "name": "Antigua and Barbuda 2004 parliamentary (overnight ag_2004_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Antigua and Barbuda", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AG/AG.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"alp": "alp", "upp": "upp", "fdcm": "fdcm", "bpm": "bpm", "bpmc": "bpmc", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:55.477560", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d666384d692044519fc1006119f31b2b", "name": "Antigua and Barbuda 1999 parliamentary (overnight ag_1999_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Antigua and Barbuda", "year": 1999, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AG/AG.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"alp": "alp", "upp": "upp", "afp": "afp", "nrm": "nrm", "bpm": "bpm", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:55.314254", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cb5de8db60af4efa8c52c613506f3f89", "name": "Antigua and Barbuda 1994 parliamentary (overnight ag_1994_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Antigua and Barbuda", "year": 1994, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AG/AG.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"alp": "alp", "upp": "upp", "bpm": "bpm", "wacs": "wacs", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:55.121801", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "36d432884bc044a38d44303944859d28", "name": "Antigua and Barbuda 1989 parliamentary (overnight ag_1989_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Antigua and Barbuda", "year": 1989, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AG/AG.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"alp": "alp", "undp": "undp", "aclm": "aclm", "bim": "bim", "bpm": "bpm", "bdm": "bdm", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:54.969882", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3a50619a642a4aff8e8793fce039d920", "name": "Antigua and Barbuda 1984 parliamentary (overnight ag_1984_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Antigua and Barbuda", "year": 1984, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AG/AG.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"alp": "alp", "upm": "upm", "plm": "plm", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:54.789117", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 15}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "21b3f3630402475ba377c7ce9bd32bff", "name": "Antigua and Barbuda 1980 parliamentary (overnight ag_1980_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Antigua and Barbuda", "year": 1980, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AG/AG.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"alp": "alp", "plm": "plm", "aclm": "aclm", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 16, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2, "votes_gt_valid": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:54.610212", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 16}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "83b1e22c9c6c48c9a4d2ddbd81b1e59e", "name": "Antigua and Barbuda 1976 parliamentary (overnight ag_1976_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Antigua and Barbuda", "year": 1976, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AG/AG.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"alp": "alp", "plm": "plm", "ind1": "ind1", "ind2": "ind2", "ind3": "ind3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2, "votes_gt_valid": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:54.434368", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ef6d60434fc2400aa2b38313911fe080", "name": "Antigua and Barbuda 1971 parliamentary (overnight ag_1971_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Antigua and Barbuda", "year": 1971, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AG/AG.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"alp": "alp", "plm": "plm", "app": "app", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 3, "cast_gt_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:54.256257", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "44de859509414dbbbd4bb5914ecf57e8", "name": "Antigua and Barbuda 1965 parliamentary (overnight ag_1965_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Antigua and Barbuda", "year": 1965, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AG/AG.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"alp": "alp", "abdm": "abdm", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 2, "registered_not_positive": 10, "cast_gt_registered": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:54.109284", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "967af5c7eb1f452cac48092316f503c9", "name": "Antigua and Barbuda 1960 parliamentary (overnight ag_1960_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Antigua and Barbuda", "year": 1960, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AG/AG.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"alp": "alp", "bdm": "bdm", "adlp": "adlp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 1, "cast_gt_registered": 4, "registered_not_positive": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:53.970802", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "aaf401d5f9d64a98945692d1e174d2cf", "name": "Antigua and Barbuda 1956 parliamentary (overnight ag_1956_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Antigua and Barbuda", "year": 1956, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AG/AG.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"alp": "alp", "anp": "anp", "pu": "pu"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 5, "registered_not_positive": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:53.820580", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a6c98a5e2504442ea262e2c94ae0e60f", "name": "Antigua and Barbuda 1951 parliamentary (overnight ag_1951_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Antigua and Barbuda", "year": 1951, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpassport.com/files/AG/AG.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"alp": "alp", "ind1": "ind1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 4, "cast_gt_registered": 4, "registered_not_positive": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:39:53.676742", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5b37f1b3107d4be6803200e2e1aac03d", "name": "Seychelles 2025 parliamentary (overnight seychelles_2025_national_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Seychelles", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ecs.sc/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/PRESIDENTIAL-NATIONAL-ASSEMBLY-ELECTION-RESULTS-BY-POLITICAL-PARTY-AND-ELECTORAL-AREA-1-2-scaled.jpg", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"lds": "lds", "independents": "independents", "spnm": "spnm", "us": "us", "mls": "mls", "sum_party": "sum_party", "ibt": "ibt", "lns": "lns"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 26, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:28:20.372725", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.751, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.881, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.76, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.68, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.751, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.478, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.482, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.488, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.488, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.68, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.632, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.054, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.054, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 26}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6a1d33d1484749e0ad04d22cff8f5bd0", "name": "Seychelles 2025 presidential (overnight seychelles_2025_presidential_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Seychelles", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ecs.sc/2025-presidential-2nd-round-results/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"herminie_us": "herminie_us", "ramkalawan_lds": "ramkalawan_lds"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 26, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:28:20.180920", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.751, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.881, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.76, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.68, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.751, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.478, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.482, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.488, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.488, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.68, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.632, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.054, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.054, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 26}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "aebc7a84b36c4a76b4b3484e2817a9e4", "name": "Seychelles 2025 presidential (overnight seychelles_2025_presidential_r1.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Seychelles", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ecs.sc/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/PRESIDENTIAL-NATIONAL-ASSEMBLY-ELECTION-RESULTS-BY-POLITICAL-PARTY-AND-ELECTORAL-AREA-1-1-scaled.jpg", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"st_ange_lns": "st_ange_lns", "herminie_us": "herminie_us", "volcere_ic": "volcere_ic", "louise_ic": "louise_ic", "moumou_spnm": "moumou_spnm", "de_clarisse_ic": "de_clarisse_ic", "ramkalawan_lds": "ramkalawan_lds", "francis_sum": "francis_sum"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 26, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:28:19.979689", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.751, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.881, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.76, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.68, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.751, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.478, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.482, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.488, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.488, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.68, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.632, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.054, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.054, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 26}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "77764b830a0a458b89d25b081faab295", "name": "Portugal 2026 presidential (overnight portugal_2026_presidential_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 2026, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.eleicoes.mai.gov.pt/presidenciais2026_2S/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"is_foreign": "is_foreign", "Ant\u00f3nio Jos\u00e9 Seguro": "Ant\u00f3nio Jos\u00e9 Seguro", "Andr\u00e9 Ventura": "Andr\u00e9 Ventura"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3366, "granularity": "parish", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 107}, "n_stations_flagged": 107, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:28:09.349921", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.926, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.717, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.228, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.919, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.166, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.166, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.899, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3366}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "65163aaa91cc4e49b696b719f3390316", "name": "Peru 2026 presidential (overnight peru_2026_presidential_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Peru", "year": 2026, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://resultadosegundavuelta.onpe.gob.pe/ (ONPE presentacion-backend API; per-mesa mirror github.com/oscarzamora/onpe-scraper-2026-2)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_fuerza_popular": "votes_fuerza_popular", "votes_juntos_por_el_peru": "votes_juntos_por_el_peru"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 92766, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:23:30.563426", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.648, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.299, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.667, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.506, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.299, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.575, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.264, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.667, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.388, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.691, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 92766}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ba2a7b0998e84c24b537ef7e5876a02c", "name": "Peru 2026 presidential (overnight peru_2026_presidential_r1.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Peru", "year": 2026, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://resultadoelectoral.onpe.gob.pe/ (ONPE presentacion-backend API; per-mesa mirror github.com/oscarzamora/onpeescraper)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alianza_para_el_progreso": "votes_alianza_para_el_progreso", "votes_ahora_nacion_an": "votes_ahora_nacion_an", "votes_alianza_electoral_venceremos": "votes_alianza_electoral_venceremos", "votes_peru_moderno": "votes_peru_moderno", "votes_fe_en_el_peru": "votes_fe_en_el_peru", "votes_frente_popular_agricola_fia_del_peru": "votes_frente_popular_agricola_fia_del_peru", "votes_avanza_pais_partido_de_integracion_social": "votes_avanza_pais_partido_de_integracion_social", "votes_fuerza_popular": "votes_fuerza_popular", "votes_fuerza_y_libertad": "votes_fuerza_y_libertad", "votes_juntos_por_el_peru": "votes_juntos_por_el_peru", "votes_libertad_popular": "votes_libertad_popular", "votes_partido_aprista_peruano": "votes_partido_aprista_peruano", "votes_partido_ciudadanos_por_el_peru": "votes_partido_ciudadanos_por_el_peru", "votes_partido_civico_obras": "votes_partido_civico_obras", "votes_partido_de_los_trabajadores_y_emprendedores_pte_peru": "votes_partido_de_los_trabajadores_y_emprendedores_pte_peru", "votes_partido_del_buen_gobierno": "votes_partido_del_buen_gobierno", "votes_partido_democrata_unido_peru": "votes_partido_democrata_unido_peru", "votes_partido_democrata_verde": "votes_partido_democrata_verde", "votes_partido_democratico_federal": "votes_partido_democratico_federal", "votes_partido_democratico_somos_peru": "votes_partido_democratico_somos_peru", "votes_partido_frente_de_la_esperanza_2021": "votes_partido_frente_de_la_esperanza_2021", "votes_partido_morado": "votes_partido_morado", "votes_partido_pais_para_todos": "votes_partido_pais_para_todos", "votes_partido_patriotico_del_peru": "votes_partido_patriotico_del_peru", "votes_partido_politico_cooperacion_popular": "votes_partido_politico_cooperacion_popular", "votes_partido_politico_integridad_democratica": "votes_partido_politico_integridad_democratica", "votes_partido_politico_nacional_peru_libre": "votes_partido_politico_nacional_peru_libre", "votes_partido_politico_peru_accion": "votes_partido_politico_peru_accion", "votes_partido_politico_peru_primero": "votes_partido_politico_peru_primero", "votes_partido_politico_prin": "votes_partido_politico_prin", "votes_partido_sicreo": "votes_partido_sicreo", "votes_podemos_peru": "votes_podemos_peru", "votes_primero_la_gente_comunidad_ecologia_libertad_y_progreso": "votes_primero_la_gente_comunidad_ecologia_libertad_y_progreso", "votes_progresemos": "votes_progresemos", "votes_renovacion_popular": "votes_renovacion_popular", "votes_salvemos_al_peru": "votes_salvemos_al_peru", "votes_un_camino_diferente": "votes_un_camino_diferente", "votes_unidad_nacional": "votes_unidad_nacional"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 92766, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:18:20.848044", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.648, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.299, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.667, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.506, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.299, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.575, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.264, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.667, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.388, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.691, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 92766}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8206267d09324b7aabebcf7a62c4f036", "name": "Colombia 2026 presidential (overnight colombia_2026_presidential_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2026, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://resultados.registraduria.gov.co/v2/json/ACT/PR/{scope}.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ivan_cepeda_castro": "ivan_cepeda_castro", "abelardo_de_la_espriella": "abelardo_de_la_espriella", "votos_en_blanco": "votos_en_blanco"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1189, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:18:09.125666", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.679, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.555, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.679, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.679, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.405, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.405, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.388, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1189}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "07df5242db7b4bb5981d256026fd5011", "name": "Colombia 2026 presidential (overnight colombia_2026_presidential_r1.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2026, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://resultados.registraduria.gov.co/json/ACT/PR/{scope}.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"abelardo_de_la_espriella": "abelardo_de_la_espriella", "paloma_valencia_laserna": "paloma_valencia_laserna", "ivan_cepeda_castro": "ivan_cepeda_castro", "sergio_fajardo_valderrama": "sergio_fajardo_valderrama", "raul_santiago_botero_jaramillo": "raul_santiago_botero_jaramillo", "claudia_lopez": "claudia_lopez", "miguel_uribe_londono": "miguel_uribe_londono", "sondra_macollins_garvin_pinto": "sondra_macollins_garvin_pinto", "oscar_mauricio_lizcano_arango": "oscar_mauricio_lizcano_arango", "roy_leonardo_barreras_montealegre": "roy_leonardo_barreras_montealegre", "gustavo_matamoros_camacho": "gustavo_matamoros_camacho", "carlos_eduardo_caicedo_omar": "carlos_eduardo_caicedo_omar", "luis_gilberto_murillo_urrutia": "luis_gilberto_murillo_urrutia", "votos_en_blanco": "votos_en_blanco"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1189, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:18:05.607807", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.679, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.555, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.679, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.679, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.405, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.405, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.388, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1189}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "84d734f201224db19a9ead7acab87f11", "name": "Belgium 2024 parliamentary (overnight belgium_2024_chamber.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Belgium", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://api.electionresults.belgium.be/election-level?ElectionId=51207&Descriptions=Municipality&Detailed=true (IBZ/SPF Interieur official election-results API; XML mirror https://verkiezingsresultaten.belgium.be/xml/2024_Chamber.xml)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Agora": "Agora", "BELG.UNIE-BUB": "BELG.UNIE-BUB", "CD&V": "CD&V", "CHEZ NOUS": "CHEZ NOUS", "COLLECTIF CITOYEN": "COLLECTIF CITOYEN", "DierAnimal": "DierAnimal", "D\u00e9FI": "D\u00e9FI", "ECOLO": "ECOLO", "GROEN": "GROEN", "GV-GEZOND VERSTAND": "GV-GEZOND VERSTAND", "LES ENGAG\u00c9S": "LES ENGAG\u00c9S", "LUTTE OUVRIERE": "LUTTE OUVRIERE", "MR": "MR", "N-VA": "N-VA", "PS": "PS", "PTB": "PTB", "PTB-PVDA": "PTB-PVDA", "PVDA": "PVDA", "Parti.j BLANCO": "Parti.j BLANCO", "Partij BLANCO": "Partij BLANCO", "RMC": "RMC", "Team Fouad Ahidar": "Team Fouad Ahidar", "VLAAMS BELANG": "VLAAMS BELANG", "Volt Europa": "Volt Europa", "Voor U": "Voor U", "Voor U / Pour Vous": "Voor U / Pour Vous", "Vooruit": "Vooruit", "l'Unie": "l'Unie", "open vld": "open vld"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 592, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 592, "registered_not_positive": 592, "votes_gt_valid": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 592, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:18:03.681095", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.873, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.891, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.81, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.794, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.321, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.08, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.031, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.031, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.969, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 592}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cee545b18ab04da78d66185d1a4d1f89", "name": "Switzerland 2023 parliamentary (overnight switzerland_2023_national_council.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Per-commune National Council party Stimmen. CAUTION: Swiss NR uses open-list panachage \u2014 each voter casts as many candidate-votes as the canton has seats (1-36), so party columns are CANDIDATE-VOTE sums and sum(parties)/valid ballots ranges 1.0-36 by canton. Do NOT reconcile candidate sums against ballots/registered. Party vote shares (Parteistaerke) remain valid. Source: opendata.swiss/BFS sd-t-17.02-NRW2023.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CSP": "CSP", "EDU": "EDU", "EVP": "EVP", "FDP": "FDP", "FGA": "FGA", "GLP": "GLP", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "LEGA": "LEGA", "LPS": "LPS", "MCR": "MCR", "MITTE": "MITTE", "PDA_SOL": "PDA_SOL", "SD": "SD", "SP": "SP", "SVP": "SVP", "UEBRIGE": "UEBRIGE"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2143, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1286, "votes_gt_valid": 2076}, "n_stations_flagged": 2141, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:17:57.120002", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.884, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.838, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.559, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2143}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c22b085ce8ad44c497a9066b960a4e1f", "name": "Greece 2023 parliamentary (overnight greece_2023june_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Greece", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "http://ekloges-prev.singularlogic.eu/2023/june/ (Greek Ministry of Interior official June 2023 results; per-section files dyn/v/{EP_ID}/tm_{TM_ID}.js + stat/v/{EP_ID}/tm_{TM_ID}.js)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u039d.\u0394.": "\u039d.\u0394.", "\u03a3\u03a5\u03a1\u0399\u0396\u0391-\u03a0.\u03a3.": "\u03a3\u03a5\u03a1\u0399\u0396\u0391-\u03a0.\u03a3.", "\u03a0\u0391\u03a3\u039f\u039a-\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u0391\u039b\u039b\u0391\u0393\u0397\u03a3": "\u03a0\u0391\u03a3\u039f\u039a-\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u0391\u039b\u039b\u0391\u0393\u0397\u03a3", "\u0395\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039d\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u039b\u03a5\u03a3\u0397": "\u0395\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039d\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u039b\u03a5\u03a3\u0397", "\u039c\u0395\u03a1\u0391 25": "\u039c\u0395\u03a1\u0391 25", "\u039a\u039a\u0395": "\u039a\u039a\u0395", "\u03a3\u03a0\u0391\u03a1\u03a4\u0399\u0391\u03a4\u0395\u03a3": "\u03a3\u03a0\u0391\u03a1\u03a4\u0399\u0391\u03a4\u0395\u03a3", "\u039d\u0399\u039a\u0397": "\u039d\u0399\u039a\u0397", "\u03a0\u039b\u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u0397 \u0395\u039b\u0395\u03a5\u0398\u0395\u03a1\u0399\u0391\u03a3": "\u03a0\u039b\u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u0397 \u0395\u039b\u0395\u03a5\u0398\u0395\u03a1\u0399\u0391\u03a3", "\u03a6\u03a9\u039d\u0397 \u039b\u039f\u0393\u0399\u039a\u0397\u03a3 \u0391\u03a6\u03a1\u039f\u0394\u0399\u03a4\u0397 \u039b\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039d\u039f\u03a0\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a5": "\u03a6\u03a9\u039d\u0397 \u039b\u039f\u0393\u0399\u039a\u0397\u03a3 \u0391\u03a6\u03a1\u039f\u0394\u0399\u03a4\u0397 \u039b\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039d\u039f\u03a0\u039f\u03a5\u039b\u039f\u03a5", "\u039f\u03b9\u03ba\u03bf\u03bb\u03cc\u03b3\u03bf\u03b9 \u03a0\u03a1\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u039d\u039f\u0399-\u03a0\u03a1\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u039d\u0397 \u0395\u039d\u039f\u03a4\u0397\u03a4\u0391": "\u039f\u03b9\u03ba\u03bf\u03bb\u03cc\u03b3\u03bf\u03b9 \u03a0\u03a1\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u039d\u039f\u0399-\u03a0\u03a1\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u039d\u0397 \u0395\u039d\u039f\u03a4\u0397\u03a4\u0391", "\u0391\u039d\u03a4.\u0391\u03a1.\u03a3\u03a5.\u0391.": "\u0391\u039d\u03a4.\u0391\u03a1.\u03a3\u03a5.\u0391.", "\u0395\u03a5-\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u03a3\u0397": "\u0395\u03a5-\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u03a3\u0397", "\u03a0\u0391\u03a4\u03a1\u0399\u03a9\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u03a3\u03a0\u0399\u03a3\u039c\u039f\u03a3": "\u03a0\u0391\u03a4\u03a1\u0399\u03a9\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u03a3\u03a0\u0399\u03a3\u039c\u039f\u03a3", "\u03a0\u03a1\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u039d\u039f \u039a\u0391\u0399 \u039c\u03a9\u0392": "\u03a0\u03a1\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u039d\u039f \u039a\u0391\u0399 \u039c\u03a9\u0392", "\u0395\u039d\u03a9\u03a3\u0397 \u039a\u0395\u039d\u03a4\u03a1\u03a9\u03a9\u039d": "\u0395\u039d\u03a9\u03a3\u0397 \u039a\u0395\u039d\u03a4\u03a1\u03a9\u03a9\u039d", "\u039a.\u039a.\u0395. (\u03bc-\u03bb)": "\u039a.\u039a.\u0395. (\u03bc-\u03bb)", "\u039c-\u039b \u039a\u039a\u0395": "\u039c-\u039b \u039a\u039a\u0395", "\u039f\u0391\u039a\u039a\u0395": "\u039f\u0391\u039a\u039a\u0395", "\u039f.\u039a.\u0394.\u0395.": "\u039f.\u039a.\u0394.\u0395.", "\u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039c\u0395\u03a4\u03a9\u03a0\u039f": "\u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039c\u0395\u03a4\u03a9\u03a0\u039f", "\u0395\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039d\u03a9\u039d \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0395\u039b\u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u0399\u03a3": "\u0395\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039d\u03a9\u039d \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0395\u039b\u0395\u03a5\u03a3\u0399\u03a3", "\u03a0\u039d\u039f\u0397 \u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u0391\u03a3": "\u03a0\u039d\u039f\u0397 \u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u0391\u03a3", "\u03a1\u03b5\u03c0\u03bf\u03c5\u03bc\u03c0\u03bb\u03b9\u03ba\u03b1\u03bd\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc \u039a\u03cc\u03bc\u03bc\u03b1 \u0395\u03bb\u03bb\u03ac\u03b4\u03b1\u03c2-\u03a4.\u03a1.\u0391.\u039c.\u03a0.": "\u03a1\u03b5\u03c0\u03bf\u03c5\u03bc\u03c0\u03bb\u03b9\u03ba\u03b1\u03bd\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc \u039a\u03cc\u03bc\u03bc\u03b1 \u0395\u03bb\u03bb\u03ac\u03b4\u03b1\u03c2-\u03a4.\u03a1.\u0391.\u039c.\u03a0.", "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u03a6\u03a4\u03a9\u03a7\u03a9\u039d \u0395\u039b\u039b\u0391\u0394\u039f\u03a3": "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u03a6\u03a4\u03a9\u03a7\u03a9\u039d \u0395\u039b\u039b\u0391\u0394\u039f\u03a3", "\u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u0395\u03a5\u03a1\u03a9\u03a0\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391": "\u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u0395\u03a5\u03a1\u03a9\u03a0\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391", "\u039f\u03a1\u0391\u039c\u0391 \u0391\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0395\u039d\u039d\u0397\u03a3\u0397\u03a3 \u0395\u039b\u039b\u0391\u0394\u039f\u03a3": "\u039f\u03a1\u0391\u039c\u0391 \u0391\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0395\u039d\u039d\u0397\u03a3\u0397\u03a3 \u0395\u039b\u039b\u0391\u0394\u039f\u03a3", "\u03a0\u0391\u039d\u0391\u0398\u0397\u039d\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391": "\u03a0\u0391\u039d\u0391\u0398\u0397\u039d\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391", "\u0391\u03bd\u03b5\u03be\u03ac\u03c1\u03c4\u03b7\u03c4\u03bf\u03b9": "\u0391\u03bd\u03b5\u03be\u03ac\u03c1\u03c4\u03b7\u03c4\u03bf\u03b9", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u03a3\u0398\u0395\u039d\u0397\u03a3 \u0392\u0395\u03a1\u0393\u0397\u03a3 \u0395\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039d\u0395\u03a3 \u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u039f\u0399": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u03a3\u0398\u0395\u039d\u0397\u03a3 \u0392\u0395\u03a1\u0393\u0397\u03a3 \u0395\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039d\u0395\u03a3 \u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u039f\u0399", "\u03a8\u0397\u03a6\u0399\u0391\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u0395\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039d\u0399\u03a3\u039c\u039f\u03a3 \u0395\u039d \u03a4\u039f \u039f\u039b\u039f\u039d": "\u03a8\u0397\u03a6\u0399\u0391\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u0395\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039d\u0399\u03a3\u039c\u039f\u03a3 \u0395\u039d \u03a4\u039f \u039f\u039b\u039f\u039d"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21869, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1, "cast_valid_mismatch": 13973}, "n_stations_flagged": 13974, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:16:51.068315", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.946, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.735, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.573, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.771, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.443, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.644, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.253, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.735, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.807, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.24, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.24, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.798, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21869}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "41db6e796a3e4ed1b0ada9c1388bc646", "name": "Netherlands 2023 parliamentary (overnight netherlands_2023_tweede_kamer.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Netherlands", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.overheid.nl/dataset/verkiezingsuitslag-tweede-kamer-2023", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"VVD": "VVD", "D66": "D66", "GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)": "GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)", "PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)": "PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)", "CDA": "CDA", "SP (Socialistische Partij)": "SP (Socialistische Partij)", "Forum voor Democratie": "Forum voor Democratie", "Partij voor de Dieren": "Partij voor de Dieren", "ChristenUnie": "ChristenUnie", "Volt": "Volt", "JA21": "JA21", "Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij (SGP)": "Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij (SGP)", "DENK": "DENK", "50PLUS": "50PLUS", "BBB": "BBB", "BIJ1": "BIJ1", "Piratenpartij - De Groenen": "Piratenpartij - De Groenen", "BVNL / Groep Van Haga": "BVNL / Groep Van Haga", "Nieuw Sociaal Contract": "Nieuw Sociaal Contract", "Splinter": "Splinter", "LP (Libertaire Partij)": "LP (Libertaire Partij)", "LEF - Voor de Nieuwe Generatie": "LEF - Voor de Nieuwe Generatie", "Samen voor Nederland": "Samen voor Nederland", "Nederland met een PLAN": "Nederland met een PLAN", "PartijvdSport": "PartijvdSport", "Politieke Partij voor Basisinkomen": "Politieke Partij voor Basisinkomen"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10040, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 10036, "registered_not_positive": 10040}, "n_stations_flagged": 10040, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:16:17.966903", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.826, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.917, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.847, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.791, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.826, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.568, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.642, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.791, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.019, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.019, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10040}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5710f5c1f6574e6ca2f144e612f3af1b", "name": "Netherlands 2025 parliamentary (overnight netherlands_2025_tweede_kamer.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Netherlands", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.overheid.nl/dataset/verkiezingsuitslag-tweede-kamer-2025", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"50PLUS": "50PLUS", "BBB": "BBB", "BIJ1": "BIJ1", "Belang Van Nederland (BVNL)": "Belang Van Nederland (BVNL)", "CDA": "CDA", "ChristenUnie": "ChristenUnie", "D66": "D66", "DE LINIE": "DE LINIE", "DENK": "DENK", "ELLECT": "ELLECT", "FNP": "FNP", "Forum voor Democratie": "Forum voor Democratie", "GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)": "GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)", "JA21": "JA21", "LP (Libertaire Partij)": "LP (Libertaire Partij)", "NL PLAN": "NL PLAN", "Nieuw Sociaal Contract (NSC)": "Nieuw Sociaal Contract (NSC)", "PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)": "PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)", "Partij voor de Dieren": "Partij voor de Dieren", "Partij voor de Rechtsstaat": "Partij voor de Rechtsstaat", "Piratenpartij": "Piratenpartij", "SP (Socialistische Partij)": "SP (Socialistische Partij)", "Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij (SGP)": "Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij (SGP)", "VVD": "VVD", "Volt": "Volt", "Vrede voor Dieren": "Vrede voor Dieren", "Vrij Verbond": "Vrij Verbond"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10085, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 10082, "registered_not_positive": 10085}, "n_stations_flagged": 10085, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:15:36.056575", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.786, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.896, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.832, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.774, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.387, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.837, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.739, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.027, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.027, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10085}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "499cb044b276414c8a2edde0d09fab5e", "name": "Chile 2025 presidential_r2 (overnight chile_2025_presidential_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Chile", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://segundavotacion.servel.cl/ (Vite SPA; data files nomina_completa_4.zip [national, 40,473 mesas] + nomina_completa_ext_4.zip [overseas, 427 mesas], territorios.zip, candidaturas.zip)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"jara_jeannette": "jara_jeannette", "kast_jose_antonio": "kast_jose_antonio"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40900, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 17}, "n_stations_flagged": 17, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:13:14.099652", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.841, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.921, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.839, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.781, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.727, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.64, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.64, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.075, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.075, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 40900}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c9896086ccaf47e2a37acc3c52aac7e9", "name": "Moldova 2025 parliamentary (overnight moldova_2025_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Moldova", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://rezultate.cec.md/api/api/ (CEC results portal; GetReport SSRS HTML per circumscription/region/station; ElectionId=10090 ElectionRoundId=20179 Parlamentare 2025)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_p20": "votes_p20", "votes_p02": "votes_p02", "votes_p01": "votes_p01", "votes_p18": "votes_p18", "votes_p21": "votes_p21", "votes_p13": "votes_p13", "votes_p08": "votes_p08", "votes_p05": "votes_p05", "votes_p06": "votes_p06", "votes_p12": "votes_p12", "votes_p03": "votes_p03", "votes_p22": "votes_p22", "votes_p15": "votes_p15", "votes_p17": "votes_p17", "votes_p04": "votes_p04", "votes_p07": "votes_p07", "votes_p09": "votes_p09", "votes_p19": "votes_p19", "votes_p11": "votes_p11", "votes_p10": "votes_p10", "votes_p14": "votes_p14", "votes_p16": "votes_p16", "votes_p23": "votes_p23"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2273, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:13:05.017909", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.233, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.056, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.553, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.449, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.233, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.056, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.274, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.48, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.62, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.425, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.187, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.388, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.553, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.449, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.44, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.325, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.325, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.652, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2273}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2129ae8e282e4c62a1702901cb494291", "name": "Ivory Coast 2025 presidential (overnight cote_divoire_2025_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cote d'Ivoire", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.cei.ci/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/EPR_2025_RESULTAT_NATIONAL.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ouattara_alassane_rhdp": "ouattara_alassane_rhdp", "gbagbo_simone_mgc": "gbagbo_simone_mgc", "lagou_henriette_gppaix": "lagou_henriette_gppaix", "billon_jeanlouis_code": "billon_jeanlouis_code", "donmello_ahoua_ind": "donmello_ahoua_ind"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 142, "granularity": "county", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-12T19:13:03.344682", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.615, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.483, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.394, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.228, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.615, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.483, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.529, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.382, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.336, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.334, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.502, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.376, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.558, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.228, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.228, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.237, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.237, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.7, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.429, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.598, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 142}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "466cd919182b448f8bddc44e87054cff", "name": "India 2006 local (overnight india_kerala_2006_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2006, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Kerala/Kerala_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CPM_C_H_KUNHAMBU": "CPM_C_H_KUNHAMBU", "BJP_ADV_M_NARAYANA_BHAT": "BJP_ADV_M_NARAYANA_BHAT", "MUL_CHERKALAM_ABDULLAH": "MUL_CHERKALAM_ABDULLAH", "BSP_MADHAVA_MANJESHWAR": "BSP_MADHAVA_MANJESHWAR", "MUL_C_T_AHAMEDALI": "MUL_C_T_AHAMEDALI", "BJP_V_RAVINDRAN": "BJP_V_RAVINDRAN", "INL_N_A_NELLIKKUNNU": "INL_N_A_NELLIKKUNNU", "IND_2_T_A_AHAMMED": "IND_2_T_A_AHAMMED", "BSP_RAJARATNA_KOTEVALAP": "BSP_RAJARATNA_KOTEVALAP", "IND_2_ABBAS_MUTHALAPPARA": "IND_2_ABBAS_MUTHALAPPARA", "CPM_K_V_KUNHIRAMAN": "CPM_K_V_KUNHIRAMAN", "INC_P_GANGADHARAN_NAIR": "INC_P_GANGADHARAN_NAIR", "BJP_ADV_B_RAVEENDRAN_NAIR": "BJP_ADV_B_RAVEENDRAN_NAIR", "IND_3_ABDULLA": "IND_3_ABDULLA", "BSP_N_MANI": "BSP_N_MANI", "CPI_PALLIPRAM_BALAN": "CPI_PALLIPRAM_BALAN", "DIC_P_RAMACHANDRAN": "DIC_P_RAMACHANDRAN", "BJP_C_K_VALSALAN": "BJP_C_K_VALSALAN", "BSP_K_C_KUNJUKOCHU_MASTER": "BSP_K_C_KUNJUKOCHU_MASTER", "IND_4_C_RAGHAVAN": "IND_4_C_RAGHAVAN", "IND_4_K_V_RAMACHANDRAN": "IND_4_K_V_RAMACHANDRAN", "IND_4_P_K_RAMAN": "IND_4_P_K_RAMAN", "CPM_KUNHIRAMAN_K": "CPM_KUNHIRAMAN_K", "INC_ADV_VAMANA_KUMAR_A_V": "INC_ADV_VAMANA_KUMAR_A_V", "BJP_KUNHIRAMAN_T": "BJP_KUNHIRAMAN_T", "IND_5_HARIDAS_P": "IND_5_HARIDAS_P", "IND_5_THAMPAN_A_K": "IND_5_THAMPAN_A_K", "BSP_BALAKRISHNAN_U": "BSP_BALAKRISHNAN_U", "INC_ADVOCATE_K_C_JOSEPH": "INC_ADVOCATE_K_C_JOSEPH", "CPM_JAMES_MATHEW": "CPM_JAMES_MATHEW", "BJP_ANIAMMA_RAJENDRAN": "BJP_ANIAMMA_RAJENDRAN", "IND_6_K_C_JOSEPH": "IND_6_K_C_JOSEPH", "IND_6_M_K_JAYARAJAN": "IND_6_M_K_JAYARAJAN", "IND_6_THANKACHAN": "IND_6_THANKACHAN", "CPM_P_K_SREEMATHI_TEACHER": "CPM_P_K_SREEMATHI_TEACHER", "INC_K_SURENDRAN": "INC_K_SURENDRAN", "BJP_A_K_RAJAGOPALAN_MASTER": "BJP_A_K_RAJAGOPALAN_MASTER", "IND_7_K_DEVI": "IND_7_K_DEVI", "CPM_C_K_P_PADMANABHAN": "CPM_C_K_P_PADMANABHAN", "INC_CHANDRAN_THILLANKERI": "INC_CHANDRAN_THILLANKERI", "BJP_ADVOCATE_A_V_KESAVAN": "BJP_ADVOCATE_A_V_KESAVAN", "BSP_MADHU_S_VAYANAL": "BSP_MADHU_S_VAYANAL", "IND_8_PRABHAKARAN": "IND_8_PRABHAKARAN", "IND_8_CHANDRAN_CHALIL": "IND_8_CHANDRAN_CHALIL", "CPM_M_PRAKASAN_MASTER": "CPM_M_PRAKASAN_MASTER", "CMPKSC_K_K_NANU": "CMPKSC_K_K_NANU", "BJP_ADV_SREEKANTHRAVIVARMA": "BJP_ADV_SREEKANTHRAVIVARMA", "BSP_C_BALAKRISHNAN": "BSP_C_BALAKRISHNAN", "IND_9_T_KUNHAMBU": "IND_9_T_KUNHAMBU", "INC_K_SUDHAKARAN_S_ORAMUNNI": "INC_K_SUDHAKARAN_S_ORAMUNNI", "CPM_K_P_SAHADEVAN": "CPM_K_P_SAHADEVAN", "BJP_BHAGYASEELAN_CHALAD": "BJP_BHAGYASEELAN_CHALAD", "IND_10_K_SUDHAKARAN_S_OGOVINDAN": "IND_10_K_SUDHAKARAN_S_OGOVINDAN", "IND_10_V_RATHNAKARAN": "IND_10_V_RATHNAKARAN", "IND_10_SAHADEVAN": "IND_10_SAHADEVAN", "IND_10_SATHEESH_PAMBAN": "IND_10_SATHEESH_PAMBAN", "C_S_RAMACHANDRANKADANNAPALLY": "C_S_RAMACHANDRANKADANNAPALLY", "DIC_K_C_KADAMBOORAN": "DIC_K_C_KADAMBOORAN", "BJP_N_K_E_CHANDRASEKHARANMASTER": "BJP_N_K_E_CHANDRASEKHARANMASTER", "IND_11_M_V_PRADEEP_KUMAR": "IND_11_M_V_PRADEEP_KUMAR", "IND_11_C_M_RAMACHANDRAN": "IND_11_C_M_RAMACHANDRAN", "CPM_KODIYERI_BALAKRISHNAN": "CPM_KODIYERI_BALAKRISHNAN", "INC_RAJ_MOHAN_UNNITHAN": "INC_RAJ_MOHAN_UNNITHAN", "BJP_SATHYA_PRAKASHAN": "BJP_SATHYA_PRAKASHAN", "IND_12_RAJAGOPALAN_UNNITHAN": "IND_12_RAJAGOPALAN_UNNITHAN", "BSP_SAJEEVAN_PARAMBAN": "BSP_SAJEEVAN_PARAMBAN", "IND_12_K_BALAKRISHNAN": "IND_12_K_BALAKRISHNAN", "JD_S_K_P_MOHANAN_S_O_P_RKURUP": "JD_S_K_P_MOHANAN_S_O_P_RKURUP", "MUL_ABDUL_KHADER_S_OMUHAMMED": "MUL_ABDUL_KHADER_S_OMUHAMMED", "BJP_A_ASHOKAN": "BJP_A_ASHOKAN", "IND_13_MOHANAN_S_O_POKKAN": "IND_13_MOHANAN_S_O_POKKAN", "IND_13_MOHANAN_S_O_KUMARAN": "IND_13_MOHANAN_S_O_KUMARAN", "IND_13_ABDUL_KHADER_K_P_S_OMOIDEEN_HAJI": "IND_13_ABDUL_KHADER_K_P_S_OMOIDEEN_HAJI", "IND_13_ABDUL_KHADERMUSALIYAR_S_O_MAMMYMUSALIYAR": "IND_13_ABDUL_KHADERMUSALIYAR_S_O_MAMMYMUSALIYAR", "CPM_P_JAYARAJAN": "CPM_P_JAYARAJAN", "INC_ADV_SAJEEV_JOSEPH": "INC_ADV_SAJEEV_JOSEPH", "BJP_ADV_M_K_RANJITH": "BJP_ADV_M_K_RANJITH", "IND_14_SAJI_JOSEPH": "IND_14_SAJI_JOSEPH", "IND_14_JAYARAJ_K_G": "IND_14_JAYARAJ_K_G", "CPM_K_K_SHYLAJA_TEACHER": "CPM_K_K_SHYLAJA_TEACHER", "INC_PROFESSOR_A_D_MUSTAFA": "INC_PROFESSOR_A_D_MUSTAFA", "BJP_M_G_RAMAKRISHNAN": "BJP_M_G_RAMAKRISHNAN", "IND_15_MUSTAFFA": "IND_15_MUSTAFFA", "IND_15_K_K_SHYLA": "IND_15_K_K_SHYLA", "IND_15_RADHAMANINARAYANAKUMAR": "IND_15_RADHAMANINARAYANAKUMAR", "CPM_K_C_KUNHIRAMAN": "CPM_K_C_KUNHIRAMAN", "MUL_P_BALAN": "MUL_P_BALAN", "BJP_P_RAMACHANDRAN": "BJP_P_RAMACHANDRAN", "IND_16_BALAN_E_V": "IND_16_BALAN_E_V", "IND_16_C_K_JANU": "IND_16_C_K_JANU", "BSP_V_C_APPAYYAN": "BSP_V_C_APPAYYAN", "IND_16_C_P_MADHAVAN": "IND_16_C_P_MADHAVAN", "LJP_LISSY_P_JOSEPH": "LJP_LISSY_P_JOSEPH", "IND_16_A_K_BALAN": "IND_16_A_K_BALAN", "IND_16_K_A_KUNHIRAMAN": "IND_16_K_A_KUNHIRAMAN", "JD_S_ADVOCATE_M_K_PREMNATH": "JD_S_ADVOCATE_M_K_PREMNATH", "INC_PONNARATHBALAKRISHNAN": "INC_PONNARATHBALAKRISHNAN", "BJP_P_M_ASOKAN": "BJP_P_M_ASOKAN", "IND_17_EDACHERY_DASAN": "IND_17_EDACHERY_DASAN", "BSP_P_BHARATHAN": "BSP_P_BHARATHAN", "CPI_BINOY_VISWAM": "CPI_BINOY_VISWAM", "INC_ADVOCATE_MVEERANKUTTY": "INC_ADVOCATE_MVEERANKUTTY", "BJP_ADVOCATE_PRAKASH_BABU": "BJP_ADVOCATE_PRAKASH_BABU", "IND_18_P_P_SUDHAKARAN": "IND_18_P_P_SUDHAKARAN", "BSP_K_SASEENDRAN": "BSP_K_SASEENDRAN", "CPM_K_K_LATHIKA": "CPM_K_K_LATHIKA", "MUL_T_T_ISMAIL": "MUL_T_T_ISMAIL", "BJP_T_K_PRABHAKARANMASTER": "BJP_T_K_PRABHAKARANMASTER", "IND_19_M_K_RAJAN": "IND_19_M_K_RAJAN", "IND_19_ISMAIL_P_T": "IND_19_ISMAIL_P_T", "BSP_T_V_GEETHA": "BSP_T_V_GEETHA", "IND_19_KALANTHAN_HAJI": "IND_19_KALANTHAN_HAJI", "IND_19_E_C_JANAKI": "IND_19_E_C_JANAKI", "IND_19_RAJAN_UMMAR_KANDY": "IND_19_RAJAN_UMMAR_KANDY", "CPM_P_VISWAN": "CPM_P_VISWAN", "DIC_ADVOCATE_P_SANKARAN": "DIC_ADVOCATE_P_SANKARAN", "BJP_V_V_RAJAN": "BJP_V_V_RAJAN", "IND_20_ARANGIL_NANGILLERYGOPINATHAN": "IND_20_ARANGIL_NANGILLERYGOPINATHAN", "IND_20_P_SANKARAN": "IND_20_P_SANKARAN", "BSP_K_T_BALAN": "BSP_K_T_BALAN", "IND_20_NOCHIYIL_P_APPUNNINAIR": "IND_20_NOCHIYIL_P_APPUNNINAIR", "IND_20_P_VISWANATHAN": "IND_20_P_VISWANATHAN", "CPM_K_KUNHAMMED_MASTER": "CPM_K_KUNHAMMED_MASTER", "KEC_M_JAMES_THEKKANADAN": "KEC_M_JAMES_THEKKANADAN", "BJP_DR_RAJAN_K_ADIYODI": "BJP_DR_RAJAN_K_ADIYODI", "BSP_K_K_BALAKRISHNAN": "BSP_K_K_BALAKRISHNAN", "IND_21_PRAKASAN_KAPPUMMAL": "IND_21_PRAKASAN_KAPPUMMAL", "ADMK_N_C_NARAYANA_KURUP": "ADMK_N_C_NARAYANA_KURUP", "IND_21_V_K_CHANDRAN": "IND_21_V_K_CHANDRAN", "IND_21_V_K_KUNHAMMED": "IND_21_V_K_KUNHAMMED", "NCP_A_K_SASEENDRAN": "NCP_A_K_SASEENDRAN", "INC_K_BALAKRISHNAN_KIDAVU": "INC_K_BALAKRISHNAN_KIDAVU", "BJP_M_C_SASEENDRAN": "BJP_M_C_SASEENDRAN", "IND_22_V_M_SURESH_BABU": "IND_22_V_M_SURESH_BABU", "IND_22_SASI": "IND_22_SASI", "IND_22_K_P_GOPALAKRISHNAN_NAIR": "IND_22_K_P_GOPALAKRISHNAN_NAIR", "BSP_P_SATHEESH": "BSP_P_SATHEESH", "IND_23_ADVOCATE_P_T_A_RAHIM": "IND_23_ADVOCATE_P_T_A_RAHIM", "DIC_K_MURALEEDHARAN": "DIC_K_MURALEEDHARAN", "BJP_K_SAHADEVAN": "BJP_K_SAHADEVAN", "IND_23_KIZHAKKEDATHMURALEEDHARAN": "IND_23_KIZHAKKEDATHMURALEEDHARAN", "IND_23_MURALEEDHARAN_K_M": "IND_23_MURALEEDHARAN_K_M", "BSP_E_M_VIJAYAN": "BSP_E_M_VIJAYAN", "ADMK_SHIHABUDEEN": "ADMK_SHIHABUDEEN", "IND_23_P_P_ADU_RAHIM": "IND_23_P_P_ADU_RAHIM", "CPM_A_PRADEEP_KUMAR": "CPM_A_PRADEEP_KUMAR", "INC_ADVOCATE_A_SUJANAPAL": "INC_ADVOCATE_A_SUJANAPAL", "BJP_PROF_SUMATHI_HARIDAS": "BJP_PROF_SUMATHI_HARIDAS", "IND_24_K_PRADEEP_KUMAR": "IND_24_K_PRADEEP_KUMAR", "IND_24_SUJANABALAN_NAIR": "IND_24_SUJANABALAN_NAIR", "BSP_P_UMMAR_KHAN_HAJI": "BSP_P_UMMAR_KHAN_HAJI", "IND_24_A_M_MINI": "IND_24_A_M_MINI", "ADMK_E_P_VIJAYAN": "ADMK_E_P_VIJAYAN", "INL_ADVOCATE_P_M_A_SALAM": "INL_ADVOCATE_P_M_A_SALAM", "MUL_T_P_M_ZAHIR": "MUL_T_P_M_ZAHIR", "BJP_P_VELAYUDHAN": "BJP_P_VELAYUDHAN", "IND_25_K_P_M_SAHIR": "IND_25_K_P_M_SAHIR", "IND_25_P_M_A_SALAM": "IND_25_P_M_A_SALAM", "BSP_LATHA_K_T": "BSP_LATHA_K_T", "IND_25_M_P_A_SALAM": "IND_25_M_P_A_SALAM", "CPM_ELAMARAM_KAREEM": "CPM_ELAMARAM_KAREEM", "MUL_UMMER_PANDIKASALA": "MUL_UMMER_PANDIKASALA", "BJP_K_P_SREESAN": "BJP_K_P_SREESAN", "BSP_K_B_NALLALAM_ALIAABDUL_KHADAR": "BSP_K_B_NALLALAM_ALIAABDUL_KHADAR", "IND_26_UMMER_C_T": "IND_26_UMMER_C_T", "IND_27_U_C_RAMAN": "IND_27_U_C_RAMAN", "CPM_C_P_BALAN_VAIDYAR": "CPM_C_P_BALAN_VAIDYAR", "BJP_K_K_BHARATHAN": "BJP_K_K_BHARATHAN", "IND_27_RAMAN_M_K": "IND_27_RAMAN_M_K", "BSP_M_SUJATHA": "BSP_M_SUJATHA", "CPM_MATHAYI_CHACKO": "CPM_MATHAYI_CHACKO", "MUL_M_C_MAYIN_HAJEE": "MUL_M_C_MAYIN_HAJEE", "BJP_ADV_AJITH_KUMAR": "BJP_ADV_AJITH_KUMAR", "IND_28_MAYIN": "IND_28_MAYIN", "BSP_K_KAMALAM": "BSP_K_KAMALAM", "JD_S_M_V_SREYAMS_KUMAR": "JD_S_M_V_SREYAMS_KUMAR", "INC_K_K_RAMACHANDRANMASTER": "INC_K_K_RAMACHANDRANMASTER", "BJP_ADV_P_R_BALAKRISHNAN": "BJP_ADV_P_R_BALAKRISHNAN", "IND_29_P_K_SURESH_KUMAR": "IND_29_P_K_SURESH_KUMAR", "IND_29_SURENDRAN": "IND_29_SURENDRAN", "IND_29_P_K_RAMACHANDRAN": "IND_29_P_K_RAMACHANDRAN", "ADMK_SHYNA": "ADMK_SHYNA", "IND_29_SAM_P_MATHEW": "IND_29_SAM_P_MATHEW", "BSP_C_RAMANKUTTY": "BSP_C_RAMANKUTTY", "IND_29_RAMACHANDRAN": "IND_29_RAMACHANDRAN", "IND_29_THANKAMMA_AUGUSTIAN": "IND_29_THANKAMMA_AUGUSTIAN", "CPM_P_KRISHNA_PRASAD": "CPM_P_KRISHNA_PRASAD", "DIC_N_D_APPACHAN": "DIC_N_D_APPACHAN", "IND_30_A_C_VARKEY": "IND_30_A_C_VARKEY", "BJP_P_PADMANABHAN_MASTER": "BJP_P_PADMANABHAN_MASTER", "BSP_ANNAN": "BSP_ANNAN", "IND_30_AJAYA_KUMAR": "IND_30_AJAYA_KUMAR", "LJP_K_K_VASU": "LJP_K_K_VASU", "ADMK_KALADHARAN": "ADMK_KALADHARAN", "INC_A_P_ANILKUMAR": "INC_A_P_ANILKUMAR", "CPM_SANKARAN_KORAMBAYIL": "CPM_SANKARAN_KORAMBAYIL", "BJP_K_U_CHANDRAN": "BJP_K_U_CHANDRAN", "BSP_DR_P_C_VIJAYAN": "BSP_DR_P_C_VIJAYAN", "INC_ARYADAN_MUHAMMED": "INC_ARYADAN_MUHAMMED", "CPM_SREERAMAKRISHNAN": "CPM_SREERAMAKRISHNAN", "BJP_K_PRABHAKARAN": "BJP_K_PRABHAKARAN", "IND_32_BINOY_PATTATHIL": "IND_32_BINOY_PATTATHIL", "BSP_KILIYAN": "BSP_KILIYAN", "ADMK_C_T_YOOSUF": "ADMK_C_T_YOOSUF", "MUL_P_K_ABDU_RABB": "MUL_P_K_ABDU_RABB", "INL_A_P_ABDUL_WAHAB": "INL_A_P_ABDUL_WAHAB", "BJP_ADV_N_SREEPRAKASH": "BJP_ADV_N_SREEPRAKASH", "IND_33_K_K_MUJEEB_RAHMAN": "IND_33_K_K_MUJEEB_RAHMAN", "BSP_ADV_V_PRAVEEN": "BSP_ADV_V_PRAVEEN", "ADMK_ASHRAF_MADATHIL": "ADMK_ASHRAF_MADATHIL", "LJP_RAJEEV_K_K": "LJP_RAJEEV_K_K", "MUL_ADVOCATE_M_UMMER": "MUL_ADVOCATE_M_UMMER", "JD_S_ADVOCATE_P_M_SAFARULLA": "JD_S_ADVOCATE_P_M_SAFARULLA", "BJP_ADVOCATE_C_DINESH": "BJP_ADVOCATE_C_DINESH", "IND_34_ABDUL_MAJEED_T": "IND_34_ABDUL_MAJEED_T", "BSP_ASHRAF_THAZHEKKODE": "BSP_ASHRAF_THAZHEKKODE", "MUL_K_MUHAMMADUNNI_HAJI": "MUL_K_MUHAMMADUNNI_HAJI", "CPM_MOHAMMEDKUTTY_T_P": "CPM_MOHAMMEDKUTTY_T_P", "BJP_ARATHIL_SUBRAHMANIAN": "BJP_ARATHIL_SUBRAHMANIAN", "BSP_ADV_C_RAJAN": "BSP_ADV_C_RAJAN", "MUL_KUTTY_AHAMMED_KUTTY": "MUL_KUTTY_AHAMMED_KUTTY", "CPI_K_MOIDEENKOYA": "CPI_K_MOIDEENKOYA", "BJP_ADVOCATE_N_ARAVINDAN": "BJP_ADVOCATE_N_ARAVINDAN", "BSP_ABU_MALIYEKKAL": "BSP_ABU_MALIYEKKAL", "IND_36_MOIDEENKOYA_K": "IND_36_MOIDEENKOYA_K", "IND_36_ABOOBACKER_ALIS_K_K_ABU": "IND_36_ABOOBACKER_ALIS_K_K_ABU", "MUL_ABDURAHIMANRANDATHANI": "MUL_ABDURAHIMANRANDATHANI", "IND_37_P_K_MOHAMMEDKUTTYKOYAKUTTY": "IND_37_P_K_MOHAMMEDKUTTYKOYAKUTTY", "BJP_M_JAYACHANDRAN": "BJP_M_JAYACHANDRAN", "IND_37_P_K_MOHAMMEDKUTTYCHEKUTTY": "IND_37_P_K_MOHAMMEDKUTTYCHEKUTTY", "BSP_BABU_KARAT": "BSP_BABU_KARAT", "CPM_P_P_ABDULLAKKUTTY": "CPM_P_P_ABDULLAKKUTTY", "MUL_E_T_MOHAMMED_BASHEER": "MUL_E_T_MOHAMMED_BASHEER", "BJP_ADV_M_K_JAYASANKAR": "BJP_ADV_M_K_JAYASANKAR", "IND_38_YOOSUF_KILLATHPARAMBIL": "IND_38_YOOSUF_KILLATHPARAMBIL", "IND_38_K_SUDHA_DEVI": "IND_38_K_SUDHA_DEVI", "BSP_THERI_VELAYUDHANKUTTY": "BSP_THERI_VELAYUDHANKUTTY", "CPM_PALOLI_MOHAMEDKUTTY": "CPM_PALOLI_MOHAMEDKUTTY", "DIC_M_P_GANGADHARAN": "DIC_M_P_GANGADHARAN", "BJP_SHOBHA_SURENDRAN": "BJP_SHOBHA_SURENDRAN", "IND_39_ABDUL_SALEEM": "IND_39_ABDUL_SALEEM", "BSP_V_K_SUKU": "BSP_V_K_SUKU", "IND_40_K_T_JALEEL": "IND_40_K_T_JALEEL", "MUL_P_K_KUNHALIKUTTY": "MUL_P_K_KUNHALIKUTTY", "BJP_ANILKUMAR": "BJP_ANILKUMAR", "IND_40_KUNHALIKUTTY_K_P": "IND_40_KUNHALIKUTTY_K_P", "IND_40_K_A_JALEEL": "IND_40_K_A_JALEEL", "IND_40_ABU_NEDUMBA": "IND_40_ABU_NEDUMBA", "IND_40_ABDUL_JABBAR": "IND_40_ABDUL_JABBAR", "BSP_SURESH": "BSP_SURESH", "IND_40_K_P_A_JALEEL": "IND_40_K_P_A_JALEEL", "IND_41_MANJALAMKUZHI_ALI": "IND_41_MANJALAMKUZHI_ALI", "MUL_DR_M_K_MUNEER": "MUL_DR_M_K_MUNEER", "BJP_DR_KUMARI_SUKUMARAN": "BJP_DR_KUMARI_SUKUMARAN", "IND_41_A_M_MUNEER": "IND_41_A_M_MUNEER", "BSP_DHARMARAJAN": "BSP_DHARMARAJAN", "IND_41_M_ALI": "IND_41_M_ALI", "IND_41_K_P_A_MUNEER": "IND_41_K_P_A_MUNEER", "IND_41_D_E_K_MUNEER": "IND_41_D_E_K_MUNEER", "CPM_SASI_KUMAR": "CPM_SASI_KUMAR", "MUL_HAMEED_MASTER": "MUL_HAMEED_MASTER", "BJP_SATHIDEVI": "BJP_SATHIDEVI", "IND_42_ABDUL_HAMEED": "IND_42_ABDUL_HAMEED", "IND_42_KODAKKADAN_HAMZA": "IND_42_KODAKKADAN_HAMZA", "BSP_K_SHEEBA_KRISHNAN": "BSP_K_SHEEBA_KRISHNAN", "IND_42_AKBAR": "IND_42_AKBAR", "IND_42_UMMER_MOULAVI": "IND_42_UMMER_MOULAVI", "IND_42_MOIDEEN_SHAH": "IND_42_MOIDEEN_SHAH", "CPM_T_P_KUNJUNNI": "CPM_T_P_KUNJUNNI", "INC_P_BALAN": "INC_P_BALAN", "BJP_VILATHUR_KRISHNANKUTTY": "BJP_VILATHUR_KRISHNANKUTTY", "BSP_UNNIKRISHNAN": "BSP_UNNIKRISHNAN", "INC_C_P_MOHAMMED": "INC_C_P_MOHAMMED", "CPI_K_E_ESMAIL": "CPI_K_E_ESMAIL", "BJP_UMA_RAJENDRAN": "BJP_UMA_RAJENDRAN", "IND_44_A_P_MOHAMED": "IND_44_A_P_MOHAMED", "IND_44_K_ISMAIL": "IND_44_K_ISMAIL", "BSP_ADV_V_K_KRISHNAKUMARPATTAMBI": "BSP_ADV_V_K_KRISHNAKUMARPATTAMBI", "CPM_M_HAMSA": "CPM_M_HAMSA", "INC_V_C_KABEER_MASTER": "INC_V_C_KABEER_MASTER", "BJP_SIVADASAN_K": "BJP_SIVADASAN_K", "BSP_CHANDRAN_M_C": "BSP_CHANDRAN_M_C", "CPM_K_S_SALEEKA": "CPM_K_S_SALEEKA", "INC_ADV_K_P_ANILKUMAR": "INC_ADV_K_P_ANILKUMAR", "BJP_M_P_NARAYANAN_KUTTY_KOCHUNNY": "BJP_M_P_NARAYANAN_KUTTY_KOCHUNNY", "IND_46_SALEENA": "IND_46_SALEENA", "BSP_RAMESH_P_V_KANNAMBARIYARAM": "BSP_RAMESH_P_V_KANNAMBARIYARAM", "CPI_JOSE_BABY": "CPI_JOSE_BABY", "MUL_KALATHIL_ABDULLA": "MUL_KALATHIL_ABDULLA", "BJP_M_K_CHANDRAN": "BJP_M_K_CHANDRAN", "ADMK_SAILAJA_PURUSHOTHAMAN": "ADMK_SAILAJA_PURUSHOTHAMAN", "BSP_R_MARUTHACHALAM": "BSP_R_MARUTHACHALAM", "CPM_V_S_ACHUTHANANDAN": "CPM_V_S_ACHUTHANANDAN", "INC_SATHEESAN_PACHENI": "INC_SATHEESAN_PACHENI", "BJP_ADV_P_J_THOMAS": "BJP_ADV_P_J_THOMAS", "IND_48_V_K_RAMACHANDRAN": "IND_48_V_K_RAMACHANDRAN", "BSP_N_SUBRAMANIAN": "BSP_N_SUBRAMANIAN", "IND_48_RAJEEV_K_R": "IND_48_RAJEEV_K_R", "IND_48_C_ARUMUGHAN": "IND_48_C_ARUMUGHAN", "CPI_ML_L_M_VELAYUDHAN": "CPI_ML_L_M_VELAYUDHAN", "IND_48_N_AMARNATH": "IND_48_N_AMARNATH", "IND_48_T_ACHUTHAN": "IND_48_T_ACHUTHAN", "CPM_K_K_DIVAKARAN": "CPM_K_K_DIVAKARAN", "INC_A_V_GOPINATHAN": "INC_A_V_GOPINATHAN", "BJP_O_RAJAGOPAL": "BJP_O_RAJAGOPAL", "IND_49_ADV_VIJAYA_SARATHY": "IND_49_ADV_VIJAYA_SARATHY", "BSP_A_K_SALEEM_AAMAYUR": "BSP_A_K_SALEEM_AAMAYUR", "IND_49_A_GOPINATHAN": "IND_49_A_GOPINATHAN", "IND_49_RAVI_EZHAVAN": "IND_49_RAVI_EZHAVAN", "IND_49_V_V_GOPINATH": "IND_49_V_V_GOPINATH", "IND_49_M_J_JOSEPH": "IND_49_M_J_JOSEPH", "INC_K_ACHUTHAN": "INC_K_ACHUTHAN", "JD_S_EZHUTHANI_K_KRISHNANKUTTY": "JD_S_EZHUTHANI_K_KRISHNANKUTTY", "BJP_ADV_JAYAKRISHNAN": "BJP_ADV_JAYAKRISHNAN", "IND_50_BABU": "IND_50_BABU", "IND_50_A_ABDUL_HAMEED": "IND_50_A_ABDUL_HAMEED", "ADMK_ADV_P_A_VELAYUDHAN": "ADMK_ADV_P_A_VELAYUDHAN", "IND_50_C_ACHUTHAN": "IND_50_C_ACHUTHAN", "IND_50_K_KRISHNAN_KUTTYKUNNATHU": "IND_50_K_KRISHNAN_KUTTYKUNNATHU", "BSP_JAYAN": "BSP_JAYAN", "IND_50_A_KRISHNAN_KUTTY": "IND_50_A_KRISHNAN_KUTTY", "CPM_V_CHENTHAMARAKSHAN": "CPM_V_CHENTHAMARAKSHAN", "INC_K_A_CHANDRAN": "INC_K_A_CHANDRAN", "BJP_G_RAMACHANDRAN": "BJP_G_RAMACHANDRAN", "IND_51_SOORYANARAYANAN": "IND_51_SOORYANARAYANAN", "BSP_SIVADASAN": "BSP_SIVADASAN", "CPM_A_K_BALAN": "CPM_A_K_BALAN", "INC_C_PRAKASH": "INC_C_PRAKASH", "BJP_P_M_KRISHNASWAMY": "BJP_P_M_KRISHNASWAMY", "IND_52_C_PRAKASAN": "IND_52_C_PRAKASAN", "BSP_K_C_RAMESAN": "BSP_K_C_RAMESAN", "CPM_M_CHANDHRAN": "CPM_M_CHANDHRAN", "IND_53_A_RAGHAVAN": "IND_53_A_RAGHAVAN", "BJP_G_SALPRAKASH": "BJP_G_SALPRAKASH", "IND_53_M_RAGHAVAN": "IND_53_M_RAGHAVAN", "BSP_M_T_CHANDHRAN": "BSP_M_T_CHANDHRAN", "IND_53_SANKARAN": "IND_53_SANKARAN", "CPM_K_RADHAKRISHNAN": "CPM_K_RADHAKRISHNAN", "INC_P_C_MANIKANDAN": "INC_P_C_MANIKANDAN", "BJP_SHAJUMON_VATTEKAD": "BJP_SHAJUMON_VATTEKAD", "CPM_A_C_MOIDEEN": "CPM_A_C_MOIDEEN", "DIC_T_V_CHANDRA_MOHAN": "DIC_T_V_CHANDRA_MOHAN", "BJP_E_CHANDRAN": "BJP_E_CHANDRAN", "IND_55_CHANDRAN_VENGANALLUR": "IND_55_CHANDRAN_VENGANALLUR", "IND_55_C_L_OUSEP_C_L_BABY": "IND_55_C_L_OUSEP_C_L_BABY", "IND_55_A_V_KRISHNAN_MOOSAD": "IND_55_A_V_KRISHNAN_MOOSAD", "CPM_BABU_M_PALISSERY": "CPM_BABU_M_PALISSERY", "DIC_ADV_V_BALARAM": "DIC_ADV_V_BALARAM", "BJP_BALAKRISHNAN_NAIR": "BJP_BALAKRISHNAN_NAIR", "IND_56_BALARAM": "IND_56_BALARAM", "ADMK_N_VIJAYA": "ADMK_N_VIJAYA", "IND_56_K_N_SHAJI": "IND_56_K_N_SHAJI", "IND_56_SANTHOSH": "IND_56_SANTHOSH", "IND_56_N_BALARAM": "IND_56_N_BALARAM", "IND_56_M_P_BALARAMAN": "IND_56_M_P_BALARAMAN", "CPI_ADV_V_S_SUNILKUMAR": "CPI_ADV_V_S_SUNILKUMAR", "CMPKSC_M_K_KANNAN": "CMPKSC_M_K_KANNAN", "BJP_ENGINEER_C_G_UNNIRAJ": "BJP_ENGINEER_C_G_UNNIRAJ", "IND_57_A_S_SUNIL": "IND_57_A_S_SUNIL", "IND_57_K_UNNIKRISHNAN": "IND_57_K_UNNIKRISHNAN", "INC_ADV_THERAMBILRAMAKRISHNAN": "INC_ADV_THERAMBILRAMAKRISHNAN", "CPM_M_M_VARGHESE": "CPM_M_M_VARGHESE", "BJP_SURENDRANAYINIKUNNATH": "BJP_SURENDRANAYINIKUNNATH", "BSP_DASAN_KUTTUKKARAN": "BSP_DASAN_KUTTUKKARAN", "IND_58_C_A_SIVAN": "IND_58_C_A_SIVAN", "IND_58_BABY_PUTHIRY": "IND_58_BABY_PUTHIRY", "IND_58_JOSEPH_JOHN": "IND_58_JOSEPH_JOHN", "CPI_RAJAJI_MATHEW_THOMAS": "CPI_RAJAJI_MATHEW_THOMAS", "INC_LEELAMMA_TEACHER": "INC_LEELAMMA_TEACHER", "BJP_E_V_KRISHNAN_NAMBOODIRI": "BJP_E_V_KRISHNAN_NAMBOODIRI", "IND_59_M_K_NANDAKUMAR": "IND_59_M_K_NANDAKUMAR", "IND_59_C_K_DILIP_KUMAR": "IND_59_C_K_DILIP_KUMAR", "CPM_PROF_C_RAVEENDRANATH": "CPM_PROF_C_RAVEENDRANATH", "INC_ADV_K_P_VISWANATHAN": "INC_ADV_K_P_VISWANATHAN", "BJP_PARAMESWARAN_NAGESH": "BJP_PARAMESWARAN_NAGESH", "IND_60_SANRO_PUTHUKKAD": "IND_60_SANRO_PUTHUKKAD", "IND_60_P_RAVEENDRAN": "IND_60_P_RAVEENDRAN", "BSP_P_C_PUSHPAKARAN": "BSP_P_C_PUSHPAKARAN", "IND_60_KUMARAN": "IND_60_KUMARAN", "IND_60_JAYAN_KONIKKARA": "IND_60_JAYAN_KONIKKARA", "IND_60_BHASKARANCHULLIKKATTIL": "IND_60_BHASKARANCHULLIKKATTIL", "CPM_B_D_DEVASSY": "CPM_B_D_DEVASSY", "INC_PROF_SAVITHRILAKSHMANAN": "INC_PROF_SAVITHRILAKSHMANAN", "BJP_K_G_SUNDARAN": "BJP_K_G_SUNDARAN", "IND_61_C_C_MENAKA_TEACHER_M_A": "IND_61_C_C_MENAKA_TEACHER_M_A", "BSP_ADV_T_K_MANOJ": "BSP_ADV_T_K_MANOJ", "IND_61_ANTO_C_L": "IND_61_ANTO_C_L", "IND_61_E_S_GEORGE": "IND_61_E_S_GEORGE", "CPI_A_K_CHANDRAN": "CPI_A_K_CHANDRAN", "INC_T_U_RADHAKRISHNAN": "INC_T_U_RADHAKRISHNAN", "IND_62_A_A_ASHARAF": "IND_62_A_A_ASHARAF", "BJP_RADHA_VELAYUDHAN": "BJP_RADHA_VELAYUDHAN", "IND_62_ROSSY_CHERIYAN": "IND_62_ROSSY_CHERIYAN", "IND_62_TOBY_VARGHESSE": "IND_62_TOBY_VARGHESSE", "BSP_JOSHY_KUMAR": "BSP_JOSHY_KUMAR", "IND_62_T_K_MURALI": "IND_62_T_K_MURALI", "KEC_M_ADV_THOMAS_UNNIYADAN": "KEC_M_ADV_THOMAS_UNNIYADAN", "CPM_C_K_CHANDRAN_CHEMPARA": "CPM_C_K_CHANDRAN_CHEMPARA", "BJP_P_G_ANILKUMAR": "BJP_P_G_ANILKUMAR", "IND_63_C_K_CHANDRAN_CHENANGATH": "IND_63_C_K_CHANDRAN_CHENANGATH", "IND_63_THOMAS_OOLAKKADAN": "IND_63_THOMAS_OOLAKKADAN", "BSP_P_K_SUBRAHMANIAN": "BSP_P_K_SUBRAHMANIAN", "IND_63_P_N_SURAN": "IND_63_P_N_SURAN", "IND_63_A_A_THOMAS": "IND_63_A_A_THOMAS", "CPM_MURALI_PERUNELLI": "CPM_MURALI_PERUNELLI", "INC_M_K_PAULSON_MASTER": "INC_M_K_PAULSON_MASTER", "BJP_SUDHEER_G_KOLLARA": "BJP_SUDHEER_G_KOLLARA", "IND_64_BABU_ELAVALLY": "IND_64_BABU_ELAVALLY", "BSP_M_V_VIJAYAN": "BSP_M_V_VIJAYAN", "CPM_K_V_ABDUL_KHADER": "CPM_K_V_ABDUL_KHADER", "MUL_C_H_RASHEED": "MUL_C_H_RASHEED", "BJP_P_M_GOPINATHAN": "BJP_P_M_GOPINATHAN", "IND_65_GOPALAN_ALIAS_GANTHIKKAD": "IND_65_GOPALAN_ALIAS_GANTHIKKAD", "IND_65_ADV_P_K_YUSUF_ISUDHEEN": "IND_65_ADV_P_K_YUSUF_ISUDHEEN", "BSP_SASI_VETTIPPARA": "BSP_SASI_VETTIPPARA", "INC_T_N_PRATHAPAN": "INC_T_N_PRATHAPAN", "CPI_FATHIMA_ABDUL_KHADARPAMBINEZHATH": "CPI_FATHIMA_ABDUL_KHADARPAMBINEZHATH", "BJP_PREETHIHARAN": "BJP_PREETHIHARAN", "IND_66_RAJAN": "IND_66_RAJAN", "BSP_A_K_SHIVARATNAN": "BSP_A_K_SHIVARATNAN", "IND_66_FATHIMA_ABDUL_KHADERPANIKKAVEETTIL": "IND_66_FATHIMA_ABDUL_KHADERPANIKKAVEETTIL", "IND_66_PRATAPAN": "IND_66_PRATAPAN", "IND_66_FATHIMA_ABDUL_KHADERPALLIPARAMBIL": "IND_66_FATHIMA_ABDUL_KHADERPALLIPARAMBIL", "IND_66_ASHKAR": "IND_66_ASHKAR", "CPI_ADV_K_P_RAJENDRAN": "CPI_ADV_K_P_RAJENDRAN", "JPSS_UMESH_CHALLIYIL": "JPSS_UMESH_CHALLIYIL", "BJP_MOHAN_SANKAR": "BJP_MOHAN_SANKAR", "IND_67_K_RAJENDRAN": "IND_67_K_RAJENDRAN", "IND_67_RAGHAVAN": "IND_67_RAGHAVAN", "IND_67_RAJAPPAN": "IND_67_RAJAPPAN", "JD_S_JOSE_THETTAYIL": "JD_S_JOSE_THETTAYIL", "INC_P_J_JOY": "INC_P_J_JOY", "BJP_A_K_NAZEER": "BJP_A_K_NAZEER", "IND_68_M_R_SATHYADEVAN": "IND_68_M_R_SATHYADEVAN", "IND_68_P_D_JOY": "IND_68_P_D_JOY", "IND_68_JAYAN": "IND_68_JAYAN", "CPM_S_SHARMA": "CPM_S_SHARMA", "DIC_M_A_CHANDRASEKHARAN": "DIC_M_A_CHANDRASEKHARAN", "BJP_M_A_BRAHMARAJ": "BJP_M_A_BRAHMARAJ", "IND_69_K_V_PURUSHOTHAMAN": "IND_69_K_V_PURUSHOTHAMAN", "IND_69_M_A_CHANDRASEKHARANMANATHARA": "IND_69_M_A_CHANDRASEKHARANMANATHARA", "BSP_C_K_RAMESAN": "BSP_C_K_RAMESAN", "IND_69_SHASHIKALA": "IND_69_SHASHIKALA", "IND_69_ABDUL_RAHIMAN": "IND_69_ABDUL_RAHIMAN", "INC_ADV_V_D_SATHEESAN": "INC_ADV_V_D_SATHEESAN", "CPI_K_M_DINAKARAN": "CPI_K_M_DINAKARAN", "BJP_ADV_V_N_SUNIL_KUMAR": "BJP_ADV_V_N_SUNIL_KUMAR", "IND_70_SATHEESAN_V_T": "IND_70_SATHEESAN_V_T", "BSP_P_S_KALADHARAN": "BSP_P_S_KALADHARAN", "IND_70_M_K_VIJAYAN": "IND_70_M_K_VIJAYAN", "CPM_M_K_PURUSHOTHAMAN": "CPM_M_K_PURUSHOTHAMAN", "INC_ADV_P_V_SREENIJAN": "INC_ADV_P_V_SREENIJAN", "BJP_V_R_JIJESH": "BJP_V_R_JIJESH", "IND_71_PURUSHOTHAMAN": "IND_71_PURUSHOTHAMAN", "IND_71_C_A_KUMARI": "IND_71_C_A_KUMARI", "IND_71_K_D_VISHWANATHAN": "IND_71_K_D_VISHWANATHAN", "IND_71_PRASAD_K_C": "IND_71_PRASAD_K_C", "BSP_N_V_NANDANAN": "BSP_N_V_NANDANAN", "INC_PROF_K_V_THOMAS": "INC_PROF_K_V_THOMAS", "CPM_M_M_LOWRANACE": "CPM_M_M_LOWRANACE", "BJP_NEDUMBASSERI_RAVI": "BJP_NEDUMBASSERI_RAVI", "IND_72_PANJIMALA_BALAKRISHNAN": "IND_72_PANJIMALA_BALAKRISHNAN", "BSP_P_S_KARUNAKARAN": "BSP_P_S_KARUNAKARAN", "MUL_V_K_IBRAHIM_KUNJU": "MUL_V_K_IBRAHIM_KUNJU", "CPM_M_C_JOSEPHINE": "CPM_M_C_JOSEPHINE", "BJP_PROF_MATHEW_PAILI": "BJP_PROF_MATHEW_PAILI", "IND_73_JOSEPHINE": "IND_73_JOSEPHINE", "CPM_C_M_DINESH_MANI": "CPM_C_M_DINESH_MANI", "INC_DOMANIC_PRASENTATION": "INC_DOMANIC_PRASENTATION", "BJP_K_N_UNNI": "BJP_K_N_UNNI", "IND_74_DOMINIC_JOSEPH": "IND_74_DOMINIC_JOSEPH", "IND_74_BENNY_JOSEPH": "IND_74_BENNY_JOSEPH", "BSP_PURUSHAN": "BSP_PURUSHAN", "INC_K_BABU": "INC_K_BABU", "CPM_K_N_RAVEENDRANATH": "CPM_K_N_RAVEENDRANATH", "BJP_NSHANKARANARAYANAN": "BJP_NSHANKARANARAYANAN", "IND_75_RAVEENDRANATH_A_K": "IND_75_RAVEENDRANATH_A_K", "IND_75_RAVEENDRANATH_C_D": "IND_75_RAVEENDRANATH_C_D", "BSP_AMBALATHARA_VASU": "BSP_AMBALATHARA_VASU", "IND_75_BABU_KRISHNAN": "IND_75_BABU_KRISHNAN", "LJP_RAMACHANDRAN_P_H": "LJP_RAMACHANDRAN_P_H", "IND_75_AYYAPPAN": "IND_75_AYYAPPAN", "IND_75_P_T_POULOSE": "IND_75_P_T_POULOSE", "CPM_A_M_YOUSUF": "CPM_A_M_YOUSUF", "INC_K_MUHAMMADALI": "INC_K_MUHAMMADALI", "BJP_P_M_VELAYUDHAN": "BJP_P_M_VELAYUDHAN", "IND_76_EDAPPALLI_BASHEER": "IND_76_EDAPPALLI_BASHEER", "BSP_PADMAKUMAR": "BSP_PADMAKUMAR", "IND_76_A_A_MOHAMMEDALISUHASAM": "IND_76_A_A_MOHAMMEDALISUHASAM", "LJP_JACOB_PETER": "LJP_JACOB_PETER", "CPM_SAJU_PAUL": "CPM_SAJU_PAUL", "INC_ADV_SHANI_MOL_USMAN": "INC_ADV_SHANI_MOL_USMAN", "BJP_C_P_RADHAKRISHNAN": "BJP_C_P_RADHAKRISHNAN", "IND_77_JAYAN_K_A": "IND_77_JAYAN_K_A", "BSP_M_K_MANOJ_KUMAR": "BSP_M_K_MANOJ_KUMAR", "CPM_ADV_M_M_MONAYI": "CPM_ADV_M_M_MONAYI", "INC_P_P_THANKACHAN": "INC_P_P_THANKACHAN", "BJP_K_R_RAJAGOPAL": "BJP_K_R_RAJAGOPAL", "IND_78_K_JAFEERKHAN": "IND_78_K_JAFEERKHAN", "CPM_M_J_JACOB": "CPM_M_J_JACOB", "DIC_T_M_JACOB": "DIC_T_M_JACOB", "BJP_ADV_K_V_SABU": "BJP_ADV_K_V_SABU", "IND_79_C_P_SAJU": "IND_79_C_P_SAJU", "IND_79_M_K_USHA": "IND_79_M_K_USHA", "IND_79_JACOB_SEEMON": "IND_79_JACOB_SEEMON", "IND_79_GEETHA": "IND_79_GEETHA", "CPI_BABU_PAUL": "CPI_BABU_PAUL", "DIC_ADV_JOHNY_NELLOOR": "DIC_ADV_JOHNY_NELLOOR", "IND_80_P_C_CYRIAC": "IND_80_P_C_CYRIAC", "IND_80_JOHNY": "IND_80_JOHNY", "BJP_P_R_VIJAYAKUMAR": "BJP_P_R_VIJAYAKUMAR", "IND_80_THOMAS_KALLAN": "IND_80_THOMAS_KALLAN", "IND_80_TOM_JOSE": "IND_80_TOM_JOSE", "IND_80_YOKACHARYA_NEELANKALLARA": "IND_80_YOKACHARYA_NEELANKALLARA", "IND_80_SHIJU_KURIAKOSE": "IND_80_SHIJU_KURIAKOSE", "KEC_CHEV_T_U_KURUVILA": "KEC_CHEV_T_U_KURUVILA", "INC_V_J_PAULOSE": "INC_V_J_PAULOSE", "BJP_M_RAMACHANDRANMASTER": "BJP_M_RAMACHANDRANMASTER", "IND_81_KURUVILA_VARGHESE": "IND_81_KURUVILA_VARGHESE", "IND_81_SHAJI_CHERIYANPEECHAKKARA": "IND_81_SHAJI_CHERIYANPEECHAKKARA", "IND_81_APPUKUTTAN": "IND_81_APPUKUTTAN", "IND_81_POULOSE_JOSEPH": "IND_81_POULOSE_JOSEPH", "KEC_P_J_JOSEPH": "KEC_P_J_JOSEPH", "INC_ADV_P_T_THOMAS": "INC_ADV_P_T_THOMAS", "BJP_SURESH_KUMAR_K_S_AJI": "BJP_SURESH_KUMAR_K_S_AJI", "IND_82_SIBY_C_MATHEW": "IND_82_SIBY_C_MATHEW", "IND_82_KUTTAPPAN_NADUKANI": "IND_82_KUTTAPPAN_NADUKANI", "IND_82_A_N_ARAVINDAN": "IND_82_A_N_ARAVINDAN", "IND_82_M_H_SIDHIQUE": "IND_82_M_H_SIDHIQUE", "IND_82_M_T_THOMAS": "IND_82_M_T_THOMAS", "CPM_S_RAJENDRAN": "CPM_S_RAJENDRAN", "INC_A_K_MONI": "INC_A_K_MONI", "BJP_R_KANNIRAJ": "BJP_R_KANNIRAJ", "ADMK_G_SOUNDARA_RAJAN": "ADMK_G_SOUNDARA_RAJAN", "IND_83_S_RAJENDRAN_2": "IND_83_S_RAJENDRAN_2", "KEC_M_ROSHY_AUGUSTINE": "KEC_M_ROSHY_AUGUSTINE", "CPM_C_V_VARGHESE": "CPM_C_V_VARGHESE", "BJP_P_A_VELUKUTTAN": "BJP_P_A_VELUKUTTAN", "IND_84_BABY_THANNICKAL": "IND_84_BABY_THANNICKAL", "BSP_P_K_SAJEEVAN": "BSP_P_K_SAJEEVAN", "CPM_K_K_JAYACHANDRAN": "CPM_K_K_JAYACHANDRAN", "DIC_EBRAHIMKUTTY_KALLAR": "DIC_EBRAHIMKUTTY_KALLAR", "BJP_SHAJI_NELLIPARAMBIL": "BJP_SHAJI_NELLIPARAMBIL", "IND_85_EBRAHIMKUTTY": "IND_85_EBRAHIMKUTTY", "BSP_P_I_ANIL": "BSP_P_I_ANIL", "ADMK_K_P_RAJAPANDY": "ADMK_K_P_RAJAPANDY", "IND_85_K_R_JAYACHANDRAN": "IND_85_K_R_JAYACHANDRAN", "IND_85_KANCHIYARPEETHAMBARAN": "IND_85_KANCHIYARPEETHAMBARAN", "CPI_E_S_BIJIMOL": "CPI_E_S_BIJIMOL", "INC_ADV_E_M_AUGASTHY": "INC_ADV_E_M_AUGASTHY", "BJP_ADV_STEPHEN_ISSAC": "BJP_ADV_STEPHEN_ISSAC", "ADMK_SUPPUROYAL_M_K": "ADMK_SUPPUROYAL_M_K", "IND_87_ALPHONS_KANNANTHANAM": "IND_87_ALPHONS_KANNANTHANAM", "INC_JOSEPH_VAZHACKEN": "INC_JOSEPH_VAZHACKEN", "IND_87_GEORGEKUTTY_AUGUSTHY": "IND_87_GEORGEKUTTY_AUGUSTHY", "IND_87_K_P_SHOUKKATH": "IND_87_K_P_SHOUKKATH", "BJP_ANIYAN_ERUMELY": "BJP_ANIYAN_ERUMELY", "BSP_N_M_ENGELS": "BSP_N_M_ENGELS", "IND_87_C_T_ALEXANDER": "IND_87_C_T_ALEXANDER", "IND_87_T_J_THANKAPPAN": "IND_87_T_J_THANKAPPAN", "IND_87_RAJU_VATTAPPARA": "IND_87_RAJU_VATTAPPARA", "IND_87_AJUMON": "IND_87_AJUMON", "KEC_M_JAYARAJAN": "KEC_M_JAYARAJAN", "CPI_RAJENDRANPARAMESWARAN_NAIR": "CPI_RAJENDRANPARAMESWARAN_NAIR", "BJP_HARI": "BJP_HARI", "BSP_SIVADAS": "BSP_SIVADAS", "KEC_M_C_F_THOMAS": "KEC_M_C_F_THOMAS", "CPM_A_V_RUSSEL": "CPM_A_V_RUSSEL", "BJP_SHYLAMMA_RAJAPPAN": "BJP_SHYLAMMA_RAJAPPAN", "BSP_RAJEEV": "BSP_RAJEEV", "IND_89_K_SADANANDAN": "IND_89_K_SADANANDAN", "IND_89_RAGHUNATHAN": "IND_89_RAGHUNATHAN", "CPM_V_N_VASAVAN": "CPM_V_N_VASAVAN", "INC_AJAY_THARAYIL": "INC_AJAY_THARAYIL", "BJP_T_N_HARIKUMAR": "BJP_T_N_HARIKUMAR", "IND_90_E_SREEDHARAN": "IND_90_E_SREEDHARAN", "IND_90_T_M_KUNJUMOL": "IND_90_T_M_KUNJUMOL", "IND_90_T_J_JOHNYKUTTY": "IND_90_T_J_JOHNYKUTTY", "KEC_M_THOMAS_CHAZHIKKADAN": "KEC_M_THOMAS_CHAZHIKKADAN", "CPM_ADV_K_S_KRISHNANKUTTYNAIR": "CPM_ADV_K_S_KRISHNANKUTTYNAIR", "BJP_ETTUMANOORRADHAKRISHNAN": "BJP_ETTUMANOORRADHAKRISHNAN", "BSP_A_P_JAYAPRAKASH": "BSP_A_P_JAYAPRAKASH", "INC_OOMMEN_CHANDY": "INC_OOMMEN_CHANDY", "CPM_SINDHU_JOY": "CPM_SINDHU_JOY", "BJP_N_K_NARAYANANNAMBOOTHIRI": "BJP_N_K_NARAYANANNAMBOOTHIRI", "BSP_SREENI_K_JACOB": "BSP_SREENI_K_JACOB", "IND_92_THOMAS": "IND_92_THOMAS", "KCS_P_C_GEORGE_PLATHOTTAM": "KCS_P_C_GEORGE_PLATHOTTAM", "KEC_M_ADV_T_V_ABRAHAMKAIPANPLACKAL": "KEC_M_ADV_T_V_ABRAHAMKAIPANPLACKAL", "BJP_ADV_T_S_JAYAKUMAR": "BJP_ADV_T_S_JAYAKUMAR", "UIPP_P_C_GEORGEPADINJAREPURACKAL": "UIPP_P_C_GEORGEPADINJAREPURACKAL", "IND_93_P_V_ABRAHAM": "IND_93_P_V_ABRAHAM", "IND_93_SAJI_ABRAHAM": "IND_93_SAJI_ABRAHAM", "IND_93_P_C_GEORGE_PLAKUTTAM": "IND_93_P_C_GEORGE_PLAKUTTAM", "BSP_RAJENDRA_PRASAD": "BSP_RAJENDRA_PRASAD", "IND_93_T_S_ABRAHAM": "IND_93_T_S_ABRAHAM", "KEC_M_K_M_MANI": "KEC_M_K_M_MANI", "NCP_MANI_C_KAPPAN": "NCP_MANI_C_KAPPAN", "BJP_JAYASOORYAN": "BJP_JAYASOORYAN", "BSP_P_I_THANKACHAN": "BSP_P_I_THANKACHAN", "IND_94_SHIBY_M_AIKKARA": "IND_94_SHIBY_M_AIKKARA", "IND_94_K_T_MATHEW": "IND_94_K_T_MATHEW", "IND_94_PAUL": "IND_94_PAUL", "IND_94_V_A_SUNNY": "IND_94_V_A_SUNNY", "KEC_ADV_MONS_JOSEPH": "KEC_ADV_MONS_JOSEPH", "KEC_M_STEPHEN_GEORGE": "KEC_M_STEPHEN_GEORGE", "BJP_K_R_MADHU": "BJP_K_R_MADHU", "IND_95_MONSON_JOSEPH": "IND_95_MONSON_JOSEPH", "BSP_C_M_DEVASIA": "BSP_C_M_DEVASIA", "SWJP_E_V_JOSEPH": "SWJP_E_V_JOSEPH", "CPI_K_AJITH": "CPI_K_AJITH", "INC_ADV_V_P_SAJEENDRAN": "INC_ADV_V_P_SAJEENDRAN", "BJP_K_K_KARUNAKARAN": "BJP_K_K_KARUNAKARAN", "IND_96_V_JIJY": "IND_96_V_JIJY", "BSP_P_SHANMUGHAN": "BSP_P_SHANMUGHAN", "IND_96_AJITHKUMAR": "IND_96_AJITHKUMAR", "IND_96_T_AJI": "IND_96_T_AJI", "IND_96_K_K_JANARDHANAN": "IND_96_K_K_JANARDHANAN", "CPM_ADV_A_M_ARIFF": "CPM_ADV_A_M_ARIFF", "JPSS_K_R_GOWRIAMMA": "JPSS_K_R_GOWRIAMMA", "BJP_N_V_PRAKASAN": "BJP_N_V_PRAKASAN", "IND_97_GOWRI": "IND_97_GOWRI", "IND_97_K_PRATHAPAN": "IND_97_K_PRATHAPAN", "BSP_THURAVOOR_SURESH": "BSP_THURAVOOR_SURESH", "IND_97_K_C_KOCHAPPAN": "IND_97_K_C_KOCHAPPAN", "CPI_P_THILOTHAMAN": "CPI_P_THILOTHAMAN", "INC_C_K_SHAJIMOHAN": "INC_C_K_SHAJIMOHAN", "BJP_SAJEEVLAL": "BJP_SAJEEVLAL", "IND_98_SHAJIMON": "IND_98_SHAJIMON", "IND_98_CHACKO_GEORGE": "IND_98_CHACKO_GEORGE", "ADMK_RAVEENDRAN": "ADMK_RAVEENDRAN", "IND_98_UTHAMAN": "IND_98_UTHAMAN", "CPM_DR_THOMAS_ISSAC": "CPM_DR_THOMAS_ISSAC", "INC_SIMMI_ROSE_BELL_JOHN": "INC_SIMMI_ROSE_BELL_JOHN", "BJP_SANU_SUDHEENDRAN": "BJP_SANU_SUDHEENDRAN", "BSP_MOHANDAS": "BSP_MOHANDAS", "IND_99_SHYLAN_V": "IND_99_SHYLAN_V", "IND_99_PAVUMBAP_PADMANABHAN": "IND_99_PAVUMBAP_PADMANABHAN", "INC_K_C_VENUGOPAL": "INC_K_C_VENUGOPAL", "CPI_T_J_ANJALOSE": "CPI_T_J_ANJALOSE", "BJP_PARAYIL_RADHAKRISHNAN": "BJP_PARAYIL_RADHAKRISHNAN", "IND_100_P_C_VENUGOPAL": "IND_100_P_C_VENUGOPAL", "ADMK_A_P_ABRAHIMKUTTY": "ADMK_A_P_ABRAHIMKUTTY", "IND_100_ADV_M_A_BINDU": "IND_100_ADV_M_A_BINDU", "IND_100_ANJALOSE": "IND_100_ANJALOSE", "IND_100_RAJAN_KOCHI": "IND_100_RAJAN_KOCHI", "CPM_G_SUDHAKARAN": "CPM_G_SUDHAKARAN", "DIC_ADV_D_SUGATHAN": "DIC_ADV_D_SUGATHAN", "BJP_G_BALADEVAN": "BJP_G_BALADEVAN", "IND_101_K_R_SASI": "IND_101_K_R_SASI", "BSP_K_J_CHANDRAMOHAN": "BSP_K_J_CHANDRAMOHAN", "ADMK_SALEENA_REHIM": "ADMK_SALEENA_REHIM", "DIC_THOMAS_CHANDY": "DIC_THOMAS_CHANDY", "KEC_DR_K_C_JOSEPH": "KEC_DR_K_C_JOSEPH", "IND_102_THOMAS": "IND_102_THOMAS", "BJP_T_K_ARAVINDAKSHAN": "BJP_T_K_ARAVINDAKSHAN", "IND_102_V_R_ANIL": "IND_102_V_R_ANIL", "BSP_M_J_ALEX": "BSP_M_J_ALEX", "IND_102_K_D_JOSEPH": "IND_102_K_D_JOSEPH", "IND_102_JOSEPH": "IND_102_JOSEPH", "IND_102_ABRAHAM_HAIJIA_DOCTOR": "IND_102_ABRAHAM_HAIJIA_DOCTOR", "INC_ADV_B_BABUPRASAD": "INC_ADV_B_BABUPRASAD", "CPM_T_K_DEVAKUMAR": "CPM_T_K_DEVAKUMAR", "BJP_N_CHITHRANGATHAN": "BJP_N_CHITHRANGATHAN", "IND_103_RAMMOHAN": "IND_103_RAMMOHAN", "BSP_P_A_SHANAVAS": "BSP_P_A_SHANAVAS", "IND_103_K_J_SHEELA": "IND_103_K_J_SHEELA", "IND_103_SUDHAKARANASARI_BALAKRISHNAN": "IND_103_SUDHAKARANASARI_BALAKRISHNAN", "CPM_C_K_SADASIVAN": "CPM_C_K_SADASIVAN", "INC_ADV_C_R_JAYAPRAKASH": "INC_ADV_C_R_JAYAPRAKASH", "BJP_PALAMUTTATHUVIJAYAKUMAR": "BJP_PALAMUTTATHUVIJAYAKUMAR", "BSP_D_SURESH_KUMAR": "BSP_D_SURESH_KUMAR", "IND_104_K_SADASIVAN": "IND_104_K_SADASIVAN", "IND_104_C_N_JAYAPRAKASH": "IND_104_C_N_JAYAPRAKASH", "IND_104_E_N_SHANTHIRAJ": "IND_104_E_N_SHANTHIRAJ", "IND_104_DR_K_KISHORE_KUMAR": "IND_104_DR_K_KISHORE_KUMAR", "IND_104_K_B_JAYAPRAKASH": "IND_104_K_B_JAYAPRAKASH", "JD_S_MATHEW_T_THOMAS": "JD_S_MATHEW_T_THOMAS", "KEC_M_VICTOR_THOMAS": "KEC_M_VICTOR_THOMAS", "IND_105_SAM_EAPEN": "IND_105_SAM_EAPEN", "BJP_MADHU_PARUMALA": "BJP_MADHU_PARUMALA", "IND_105_SUBRAMONYANNAMPOOTHIRI": "IND_105_SUBRAMONYANNAMPOOTHIRI", "IND_105_ADV_MATHEW_P_THOMAS": "IND_105_ADV_MATHEW_P_THOMAS", "ADMK_AMBALAPPUZHANATESHAN": "ADMK_AMBALAPPUZHANATESHAN", "IND_105_KRISHNAN_KUTTY": "IND_105_KRISHNAN_KUTTY", "KEC_M_JOSEPH_M_PUTHUSSERI": "KEC_M_JOSEPH_M_PUTHUSSERI", "IND_106_CHERIAN_PHILIP": "IND_106_CHERIAN_PHILIP", "BJP_ADV_HARIDAS_P": "BJP_ADV_HARIDAS_P", "BSP_K_K_KRISHNAN_KUTTY": "BSP_K_K_KRISHNAN_KUTTY", "ADMK_GEETHA_SASI": "ADMK_GEETHA_SASI", "CPM_K_C_RAJAGOPALAN": "CPM_K_C_RAJAGOPALAN", "IND_107_K_R_RAJAPPAN": "IND_107_K_R_RAJAPPAN", "DIC_MALETHU_SARALADEVI": "DIC_MALETHU_SARALADEVI", "BJP_ASHOKAN_KULANADA": "BJP_ASHOKAN_KULANADA", "SLAP_THOMASKUTTY_RANNIACHAYAN": "SLAP_THOMASKUTTY_RANNIACHAYAN", "IND_107_V_R_SISILY": "IND_107_V_R_SISILY", "IND_107_RADHAKRISHNAN_S": "IND_107_RADHAKRISHNAN_S", "IND_107_C_C_KUTTAPPAN": "IND_107_C_C_KUTTAPPAN", "INC_P_C_VISHNUNATH": "INC_P_C_VISHNUNATH", "CPM_SAJI_CHERIAN": "CPM_SAJI_CHERIAN", "BJP_MANNAR_SATHEESH": "BJP_MANNAR_SATHEESH", "IND_108_SASI_E_T": "IND_108_SASI_E_T", "IND_108_V_VENUGOPAL": "IND_108_V_VENUGOPAL", "INC_M_MURALI": "INC_M_MURALI", "CPM_G_RAJAMMA": "CPM_G_RAJAMMA", "BJP_ADV_T_O_NOUSHAD": "BJP_ADV_T_O_NOUSHAD", "IND_109_VARGHESE_GEORGE": "IND_109_VARGHESE_GEORGE", "ADMK_THAJUDHEENALUMMOOTTIL": "ADMK_THAJUDHEENALUMMOOTTIL", "IND_109_PRASANNA_KUMAR": "IND_109_PRASANNA_KUMAR", "JPSS_K_K_SHAJU": "JPSS_K_K_SHAJU", "CPM_K_RAGHAVAN": "CPM_K_RAGHAVAN", "BJP_S_GIRIJA": "BJP_S_GIRIJA", "IND_110_P_C_SHYJU": "IND_110_P_C_SHYJU", "IND_110_N_RAGHAVAN": "IND_110_N_RAGHAVAN", "IND_110_M_SHYJU": "IND_110_M_SHYJU", "BSP_ADVOCATE_V_ANIL": "BSP_ADVOCATE_V_ANIL", "IND_110_P_K_SUKUMARAN": "IND_110_P_K_SUKUMARAN", "CPM_RAJU_ABRAHAM": "CPM_RAJU_ABRAHAM", "INC_ADV_PEELIPOSE_THOMAS": "INC_ADV_PEELIPOSE_THOMAS", "BJP_PRASAD_N_BHASKARAN": "BJP_PRASAD_N_BHASKARAN", "BSP_K_V_MATHEW": "BSP_K_V_MATHEW", "ADMK_LAIJU_KANNAMTHANAM": "ADMK_LAIJU_KANNAMTHANAM", "IND_111_SADANANDAN_M_S": "IND_111_SADANANDAN_M_S", "IND_111_ABRAHAM_THAMPI": "IND_111_ABRAHAM_THAMPI", "INC_ADV_K_SIVADASAN_NAIR": "INC_ADV_K_SIVADASAN_NAIR", "CPM_V_K_PURUSHOTHAMANPILLAI": "CPM_V_K_PURUSHOTHAMANPILLAI", "IND_112_K_K_NAIR": "IND_112_K_K_NAIR", "BJP_A_G_UNNIKRISHNAN": "BJP_A_G_UNNIKRISHNAN", "IND_112_P_P_GEORGEKUTTY": "IND_112_P_P_GEORGEKUTTY", "IND_112_ADV_M_S_MADHU": "IND_112_ADV_M_S_MADHU", "ADMK_BIJU_RAJAN": "ADMK_BIJU_RAJAN", "IND_112_BAIJU_BHASKAR": "IND_112_BAIJU_BHASKAR", "INC_ADOOR_PRAKASH": "INC_ADOOR_PRAKASH", "CPM_V_R_SIVARAJAN": "CPM_V_R_SIVARAJAN", "BJP_P_D_PADMAKUMAR": "BJP_P_D_PADMAKUMAR", "IND_113_PRAKASH": "IND_113_PRAKASH", "ADMK_RATHEESH_KUMAR": "ADMK_RATHEESH_KUMAR", "RJD_SIVAPRASAD_RAGHAVAN": "RJD_SIVAPRASAD_RAGHAVAN", "IND_113_M_K_PODIYAN": "IND_113_M_K_PODIYAN", "IND_113_K_G_ANILKUMAR": "IND_113_K_G_ANILKUMAR", "KEC_B_K_B_GANESH_KUMAR": "KEC_B_K_B_GANESH_KUMAR", "CPI_K_R_CHANDRAMOHANAN": "CPI_K_R_CHANDRAMOHANAN", "BJP_VILAKKUDI_CHANDRAN": "BJP_VILAKKUDI_CHANDRAN", "IND_114_ANEESH_ANTONY": "IND_114_ANEESH_ANTONY", "IND_114_MADAPPARAMURALEEDHARAN": "IND_114_MADAPPARAMURALEEDHARAN", "BSP_KUZHICHEYIL_SUNIL": "BSP_KUZHICHEYIL_SUNIL", "IND_114_S_KRISHNAN_KUTTY": "IND_114_S_KRISHNAN_KUTTY", "CPI_ADV_K_RAJU": "CPI_ADV_K_RAJU", "CMPKSC_M_V_RAGHAVAN": "CMPKSC_M_V_RAGHAVAN", "BSP_THOLLUR_RAJAGOPALAN": "BSP_THOLLUR_RAJAGOPALAN", "IND_115_KOTTIYAM_NAISAM": "IND_115_KOTTIYAM_NAISAM", "IND_115_SANTHOSH_S": "IND_115_SANTHOSH_S", "IND_115_MADAPPARAMURALEEDHARAN": "IND_115_MADAPPARAMURALEEDHARAN", "CPI_MULLAKKARARATHNAKARAN": "CPI_MULLAKKARARATHNAKARAN", "INC_PRAYAR_GOPALAKRISHNAN": "INC_PRAYAR_GOPALAKRISHNAN", "BJP_YEROOR_ANIL": "BJP_YEROOR_ANIL", "IND_116_KADACKAL_SUNDHARESAN": "IND_116_KADACKAL_SUNDHARESAN", "BSP_JOSE_SARANADH": "BSP_JOSE_SARANADH", "CPM_ADV_AISHA_POTTI": "CPM_ADV_AISHA_POTTI", "KEC_B_R_BALAKRISHNA_PILLAI": "KEC_B_R_BALAKRISHNA_PILLAI", "BJP_ADV_N_CHANDRAMOHANAN": "BJP_ADV_N_CHANDRAMOHANAN", "IND_117_C_D_MATHEW": "IND_117_C_D_MATHEW", "BSP_K_VISWANATHAN": "BSP_K_VISWANATHAN", "ADMK_BIJU": "ADMK_BIJU", "CPM_B_RAGHAVAN": "CPM_B_RAGHAVAN", "INC_EZHUKONE_NARAYANAN": "INC_EZHUKONE_NARAYANAN", "BJP_MADATHIL_SASI": "BJP_MADATHIL_SASI", "INC_THIRUVANCHOORRADHAKRISHNAN": "INC_THIRUVANCHOORRADHAKRISHNAN", "KEC_PROF_D_K_JOHN": "KEC_PROF_D_K_JOHN", "BJP_T_R_AJITH_KUMAR": "BJP_T_R_AJITH_KUMAR", "IND_119_MEENATHEPURARADHAKRISHNAN": "IND_119_MEENATHEPURARADHAKRISHNAN", "BSP_ENGINEER_M_S_BABU": "BSP_ENGINEER_M_S_BABU", "IND_119_S_V_JOHN": "IND_119_S_V_JOHN", "RSP_KOVOOR_KUNJUMON": "RSP_KOVOOR_KUNJUMON", "INC_P_RAMABHADRAN": "INC_P_RAMABHADRAN", "BJP_ADV_M_SARASWATHY": "BJP_ADV_M_SARASWATHY", "BSP_P_T_PRASANNAKUMAR": "BSP_P_T_PRASANNAKUMAR", "CPI_C_DIVAKARAN": "CPI_C_DIVAKARAN", "JPSS_ADV_A_N_RAJAN_BABU": "JPSS_ADV_A_N_RAJAN_BABU", "IND_121_N_PARAMESWARAN_POTTY": "IND_121_N_PARAMESWARAN_POTTY", "BJP_ANIL_VAZHAPPALLY": "BJP_ANIL_VAZHAPPALLY", "BSP_ADV_S_PRAHLADAN": "BSP_ADV_S_PRAHLADAN", "IND_121_T_H_MUHAMMED_KUNJU": "IND_121_T_H_MUHAMMED_KUNJU", "IND_121_N_GOPINATHAN": "IND_121_N_GOPINATHAN", "RSP_N_K_PREMACHANDRAN": "RSP_N_K_PREMACHANDRAN", "IND_122_SHIBU_BABY_JOHN": "IND_122_SHIBU_BABY_JOHN", "BJP_UDAYAKUMAR": "BJP_UDAYAKUMAR", "RSPK_B_SHIBU_BALAKRISHNAN": "RSPK_B_SHIBU_BALAKRISHNAN", "IND_122_ABU_MUHAMMED": "IND_122_ABU_MUHAMMED", "ADMK_K_MUHAMMED_KUNJU": "ADMK_K_MUHAMMED_KUNJU", "BSP_JAYAKUMAR": "BSP_JAYAKUMAR", "CPM_M_A_BABY": "CPM_M_A_BABY", "INC_KADAVOOR_SIVADASAN": "INC_KADAVOOR_SIVADASAN", "BJP_ADV_KALLADASUNILKUMAR": "BJP_ADV_KALLADASUNILKUMAR", "BSP_DILEEPKUMAR_S": "BSP_DILEEPKUMAR_S", "IND_123_SIVADASAN": "IND_123_SIVADASAN", "IND_123_BABY": "IND_123_BABY", "IND_123_V_ANTONY": "IND_123_V_ANTONY", "IND_123_JOHNSON_KALLADA": "IND_123_JOHNSON_KALLADA", "CPM_P_K_GURUDASAN": "CPM_P_K_GURUDASAN", "IND_124_BABU_DIVAKARAN": "IND_124_BABU_DIVAKARAN", "BJP_C_THAMPY": "BJP_C_THAMPY", "BSP_MANGADTHULASEEDHARAN": "BSP_MANGADTHULASEEDHARAN", "RSP_A_A_AZEEZ": "RSP_A_A_AZEEZ", "MUL_K_M_SHAJI": "MUL_K_M_SHAJI", "BJP_ADV_G_GOPAKUMAR": "BJP_ADV_G_GOPAKUMAR", "IND_125_S_RADHAKRISHNAN": "IND_125_S_RADHAKRISHNAN", "IND_125_ABDUL_AZEEZ": "IND_125_ABDUL_AZEEZ", "BSP_C_K_RAMANAN": "BSP_C_K_RAMANAN", "CPI_N_ANIRUDHAN": "CPI_N_ANIRUDHAN", "INC_DR_G_PRATHAPAVARMATHAMPAN": "INC_DR_G_PRATHAPAVARMATHAMPAN", "BJP_MURALEEDHARAN_PILLAI": "BJP_MURALEEDHARAN_PILLAI", "IND_126_ABDUL_RAHIM": "IND_126_ABDUL_RAHIM", "IND_126_N_GANAPATHY_PILLAI": "IND_126_N_GANAPATHY_PILLAI", "BSP_SUSHAMA_VIJAYAN": "BSP_SUSHAMA_VIJAYAN", "INC_VARKALA_KAHAR": "INC_VARKALA_KAHAR", "CPM_ADV_S_SUNDARESAN": "CPM_ADV_S_SUNDARESAN", "BJP_CHERUNNIYOORSIVAPRASAD": "BJP_CHERUNNIYOORSIVAPRASAD", "BSP_KUMAR_R": "BSP_KUMAR_R", "IND_127_SASIDHARAN": "IND_127_SASIDHARAN", "IND_127_KAHAR": "IND_127_KAHAR", "IND_127_K_R_ARAVINDAKSHANPILLAI": "IND_127_K_R_ARAVINDAKSHANPILLAI", "IND_127_ADV_SREEVALSAMGOPALKRISHNAN": "IND_127_ADV_SREEVALSAMGOPALKRISHNAN", "IND_127_VIVEKANANDAN": "IND_127_VIVEKANANDAN", "IND_127_K_OMANA": "IND_127_K_OMANA", "IND_127_MURALI_KUMAR": "IND_127_MURALI_KUMAR", "CPM_ANATHALAVATTOMANANDAN": "CPM_ANATHALAVATTOMANANDAN", "INC_ADV_CMOHANACHANDRAN": "INC_ADV_CMOHANACHANDRAN", "BJP_KIZHUVILAMRADHAKRISHNAN": "BJP_KIZHUVILAMRADHAKRISHNAN", "IND_128_VAKKOM_G_AJITH": "IND_128_VAKKOM_G_AJITH", "IND_128_SHIBU_B": "IND_128_SHIBU_B", "IND_128_MOHANACHANDRAN": "IND_128_MOHANACHANDRAN", "BSP_RAMLAL": "BSP_RAMLAL", "IND_128_CHITRAKUMARI_G_S": "IND_128_CHITRAKUMARI_G_S", "IND_128_ADV_CHIRAYINKILGOPINATHAN": "IND_128_ADV_CHIRAYINKILGOPINATHAN", "IND_128_ALAMCODE_DILSHAD": "IND_128_ALAMCODE_DILSHAD", "CPI_N_RAJAN": "CPI_N_RAJAN", "DIC_KAVALLOOR_MADHU": "DIC_KAVALLOOR_MADHU", "BJP_KINAKARI_JANARDANAN": "BJP_KINAKARI_JANARDANAN", "BSP_MADAVOOR_NANDAKUMAR": "BSP_MADAVOOR_NANDAKUMAR", "IND_129_K_RAVEENDRAN": "IND_129_K_RAVEENDRAN", "IND_129_BABU_T": "IND_129_BABU_T", "IND_129_G_ANANDAN": "IND_129_G_ANANDAN", "IND_129_PANDALAM_RAJENDRAN": "IND_129_PANDALAM_RAJENDRAN", "CPM_J_ARUNDHATHI": "CPM_J_ARUNDHATHI", "JPSS_ADV_S_SHINE": "JPSS_ADV_S_SHINE", "IND_130_ADV_S_ANILKUMAR": "IND_130_ADV_S_ANILKUMAR", "BJP_K_DAMODHARAN_POTTI": "BJP_K_DAMODHARAN_POTTI", "IND_130_ADV_SHINE_DINESH": "IND_130_ADV_SHINE_DINESH", "IND_130_ANILKUMAR": "IND_130_ANILKUMAR", "IND_130_ARUNDHATHI": "IND_130_ARUNDHATHI", "IND_130_ADV_SYAMLAL": "IND_130_ADV_SYAMLAL", "INC_G_KARTHIKEYAN_ARYANAD": "INC_G_KARTHIKEYAN_ARYANAD", "RSP_T_J_CHANDRACHOODAN": "RSP_T_J_CHANDRACHOODAN", "BJP_JOHN_THOMAS_ITHIYOOR": "BJP_JOHN_THOMAS_ITHIYOOR", "BSP_DR_P_D_RAJAN": "BSP_DR_P_D_RAJAN", "IND_131_RICHARD_BENNET": "IND_131_RICHARD_BENNET", "LJP_B_L_JOSE": "LJP_B_L_JOSE", "IND_131_KARTHIKEYAN": "IND_131_KARTHIKEYAN", "IND_131_B_MURALEEDHARAN_NAIR": "IND_131_B_MURALEEDHARAN_NAIR", "IND_131_G_KARTHIKEYAN_VARKALA": "IND_131_G_KARTHIKEYAN_VARKALA", "IND_131_MUNDELA_PRASAD": "IND_131_MUNDELA_PRASAD", "ADMK_B_SATHEESHKUMAR": "ADMK_B_SATHEESHKUMAR", "CPI_MANKODERADHAKRISHNAN": "CPI_MANKODERADHAKRISHNAN", "INC_PALODE_RAVI": "INC_PALODE_RAVI", "BJP_ADV_R_SUBRAMNIANPOTTY": "BJP_ADV_R_SUBRAMNIANPOTTY", "BSP_KARAKULAM_SAJAN": "BSP_KARAKULAM_SAJAN", "IND_132_S_SREEKUMAR": "IND_132_S_SREEKUMAR", "IND_132_RAVEENDRAN_NAIR": "IND_132_RAVEENDRAN_NAIR", "INC_M_A_VAHID": "INC_M_A_VAHID", "CPM_KADAKAMPALLYSURENDRAN": "CPM_KADAKAMPALLYSURENDRAN", "BJP_MADAVOORRADHAKRISHNANUNNITHAN": "BJP_MADAVOORRADHAKRISHNANUNNITHAN", "IND_133_H_P_SHAJI": "IND_133_H_P_SHAJI", "BSP_VENGODU_SUNIL_KUMAR": "BSP_VENGODU_SUNIL_KUMAR", "IND_133_B_K_SURENDRAN": "IND_133_B_K_SURENDRAN", "IND_133_SHAIJU_P": "IND_133_SHAIJU_P", "CPM_M_VIJAYAKUMAR": "CPM_M_VIJAYAKUMAR", "INC_ADV_K_MOHANKUMAR": "INC_ADV_K_MOHANKUMAR", "BJP_PRO_JAYALAKSHMI": "BJP_PRO_JAYALAKSHMI", "BSP_P_KAMALASANAN": "BSP_P_KAMALASANAN", "IND_134_M_ASHOKAN": "IND_134_M_ASHOKAN", "IND_134_V_T_CHERIAN": "IND_134_V_T_CHERIAN", "IND_134_R_RAJESH_CHANDRAN": "IND_134_R_RAJESH_CHANDRAN", "IND_134_MOHANAN": "IND_134_MOHANAN", "KEC_V_SURENDRAN_PILLAI": "KEC_V_SURENDRAN_PILLAI", "DIC_SHOBHANA_GEORGE": "DIC_SHOBHANA_GEORGE", "IND_135_T_SARATH_CHANDRAPRASAD": "IND_135_T_SARATH_CHANDRAPRASAD", "IND_135_S_DEVAN": "IND_135_S_DEVAN", "IND_135_P_S_GOPAKUMAR": "IND_135_P_S_GOPAKUMAR", "BSP_SEBASTIAN_G_T": "BSP_SEBASTIAN_G_T", "IND_135_PHILIP_JOSEPH": "IND_135_PHILIP_JOSEPH", "IND_135_V_S_GIREESHKUMAR": "IND_135_V_S_GIREESHKUMAR", "ADMK_M_D_WILLIAMS": "ADMK_M_D_WILLIAMS", "IND_135_V_HARIKUMAR": "IND_135_V_HARIKUMAR", "CPM_V_SIVANKUTTY": "CPM_V_SIVANKUTTY", "INC_B_VIJAYAKUMAR": "INC_B_VIJAYAKUMAR", "IND_136_JYODEENDRAKUMAR": "IND_136_JYODEENDRAKUMAR", "IND_136_T_MURUKESAN": "IND_136_T_MURUKESAN", "BSP_M_RAJEEV": "BSP_M_RAJEEV", "IND_136_THYCAUD_R_CHANDRN": "IND_136_THYCAUD_R_CHANDRN", "IND_136_VIJAYAKUMAR": "IND_136_VIJAYAKUMAR", "IND_136_ATTUKAL_VIKRAMAN": "IND_136_ATTUKAL_VIKRAMAN", "IND_136_BABINGTON": "IND_136_BABINGTON", "INC_N_SAKTHAN": "INC_N_SAKTHAN", "CPM_VENGANOOR_P_BHASKARAN": "CPM_VENGANOOR_P_BHASKARAN", "BJP_MALAYINKEEZHURADHAKRISHNAN": "BJP_MALAYINKEEZHURADHAKRISHNAN", "BSP_ADV_ROBINSON_DAVID": "BSP_ADV_ROBINSON_DAVID", "IND_137_SREEKUMAR": "IND_137_SREEKUMAR", "ADMK_RAJEEV_R_NAIR": "ADMK_RAJEEV_R_NAIR", "INC_ADV_GEORGE_MERCIER": "INC_ADV_GEORGE_MERCIER", "IND_138_DR_ANEELALOHITHADASANNADAR": "IND_138_DR_ANEELALOHITHADASANNADAR", "JD_S_RUFUS_DANIEL": "JD_S_RUFUS_DANIEL", "BJP_K_SATHEESH_KUMAR": "BJP_K_SATHEESH_KUMAR", "BSP_VANDITHADAMVALSARAJAN": "BSP_VANDITHADAMVALSARAJAN", "IND_138_ROSAMMA_T": "IND_138_ROSAMMA_T", "IND_138_J_SISUPALAN": "IND_138_J_SISUPALAN", "IND_138_FIROZ_KHAN": "IND_138_FIROZ_KHAN", "IND_138_K_ARUN_KUMAR": "IND_138_K_ARUN_KUMAR", "IND_138_JAPAMANI_CANAN": "IND_138_JAPAMANI_CANAN", "CPM_V_J_THANKAPPAN": "CPM_V_J_THANKAPPAN", "INC_THAMPANOOR_RAVI": "INC_THAMPANOOR_RAVI", "BJP_KKPARAMESHWARANKUTTY": "BJP_KKPARAMESHWARANKUTTY", "BSP_JYOTHIRAJ": "BSP_JYOTHIRAJ", "IND_139_S_KUNJUKRISHNAN": "IND_139_S_KUNJUKRISHNAN", "ADMK_MOHANKUMAR": "ADMK_MOHANKUMAR", "CPM_R_SELVARAJ": "CPM_R_SELVARAJ", "INC_N_SUNDARAN_NADAR": "INC_N_SUNDARAN_NADAR", "BSP_DR_G_SUDEVAN": "BSP_DR_G_SUDEVAN", "JD_U_V_ASOKAN": "JD_U_V_ASOKAN", "IND_140_K_HAREENDRABABU": "IND_140_K_HAREENDRABABU", "ADMK_K_SUKUMARAN": "ADMK_K_SUKUMARAN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 140, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 140, "cast_gt_registered": 140}, "n_stations_flagged": 140, "created_at": "2026-07-11T22:47:50.199153", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.768, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.854, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.721, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.569, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.111, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 140}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "998e5732535642f49ac0f34f2abe5ff0", "name": "India 2006 state assembly election (ae) (overnight india-tamil-nadu-2006-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2006, "election_type": "other", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/browse-data?et=SE (State: Tamil Nadu, Assembly Election 2006)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"JAYAKUMAR_D__ADMK": "JAYAKUMAR_D__ADMK", "SARKUNAPANDIAN_S_P__DMK": "SARKUNAPANDIAN_S_P__DMK", "ROYAPURAM_V_BABU__DMDK": "ROYAPURAM_V_BABU__DMDK", "KUMAR_V_C__BJP": "KUMAR_V_C__BJP", "SREENIVASULU_J__BSP": "SREENIVASULU_J__BSP", "ALEXANDER_G__LJP": "ALEXANDER_G__LJP", "SORNARAJ_N__IND": "SORNARAJ_N__IND", "ARIVUNITHI_K__IND": "ARIVUNITHI_K__IND", "SARAVANAN_P_V__IND": "SARAVANAN_P_V__IND", "SELVARAJ_M__IND": "SELVARAJ_M__IND", "ANBARASU_V__IND": "ANBARASU_V__IND", "SUDHAKAR_R__IND": "SUDHAKAR_R__IND", "ANBAZHAGAN_K__DMK": "ANBAZHAGAN_K__DMK", "SEEMA_BASHEER_H__MDMK": "SEEMA_BASHEER_H__MDMK", "CHANDRA_PRAKASAM_C__DMDK": "CHANDRA_PRAKASAM_C__DMDK", "VAITHIALINGAM_V__BJP": "VAITHIALINGAM_V__BJP", "VINOBA_GANDHI_C_H__IND": "VINOBA_GANDHI_C_H__IND", "MUNUSAMY_P__IND": "MUNUSAMY_P__IND", "MOHAMMED_ASKAR__IND": "MOHAMMED_ASKAR__IND", "SAKTHIVEL_K__IND": "SAKTHIVEL_K__IND", "INDRAKUMAR_S__IND": "INDRAKUMAR_S__IND", "MOHAMED_JAGUBAR__IND": "MOHAMED_JAGUBAR__IND", "SEKAR_BABU_P_K__ADMK": "SEKAR_BABU_P_K__ADMK", "MANOHAR_R__INC": "MANOHAR_R__INC", "MOHAMED_JAN_P__DMDK": "MOHAMED_JAN_P__DMDK", "PREM_ANANTH_K_P__BJP": "PREM_ANANTH_K_P__BJP", "RAJENDRAN_K__IND": "RAJENDRAN_K__IND", "SASIKUMAR_S__IND": "SASIKUMAR_S__IND", "GANGADURAI_G__JJ": "GANGADURAI_G__JJ", "MANOHARAN_S__IND": "MANOHARAN_S__IND", "MARIMUTHU_E__IND": "MARIMUTHU_E__IND", "MARIMUTHU_P__IND": "MARIMUTHU_P__IND", "KAJA_MOHIDEEN_S__IND": "KAJA_MOHIDEEN_S__IND", "DURAIVELU_T__IND": "DURAIVELU_T__IND", "SANTHOSH_KUMAR_S__IND": "SANTHOSH_KUMAR_S__IND", "SRINIVASAN_K__ADMK": "SRINIVASAN_K__ADMK", "RAHMANKHAN_A__DMK": "RAHMANKHAN_A__DMK", "BALASUBRAMANIAN_K__DMDK": "BALASUBRAMANIAN_K__DMDK", "KANTILAL_C__BJP": "KANTILAL_C__BJP", "HARIKRISHNAN_S__BSP": "HARIKRISHNAN_S__BSP", "SRINIVASAMOORTHY_C_R__TNJC": "SRINIVASAMOORTHY_C_R__TNJC", "VENKATESAN_P__IND": "VENKATESAN_P__IND", "VIJAYARAGAVAN_M__IND": "VIJAYARAGAVAN_M__IND", "PANNEERSELVAM_C__IND": "PANNEERSELVAM_C__IND", "NAGARAJAN_R_R__IND": "NAGARAJAN_R_R__IND", "YUVAKUMAR_P_N__IND": "YUVAKUMAR_P_N__IND", "KARUNAKARAN_D__IND": "KARUNAKARAN_D__IND", "SRINIVASAN_K_P__IND": "SRINIVASAN_K_P__IND", "DURAI_N_P__IND": "DURAI_N_P__IND", "SENTHILKUMARAN_S__IND": "SENTHILKUMARAN_S__IND", "MAHENDRAN_K__CPM": "MAHENDRAN_K__CPM", "MANIMARAN_P__MDMK": "MANIMARAN_P__MDMK", "LINGAM_J__DMDK": "LINGAM_J__DMDK", "PERUMAL_V__BSP": "PERUMAL_V__BSP", "VISWANATHAN_KAKKAN_P__JP": "VISWANATHAN_KAKKAN_P__JP", "JEENAPRIYA_I__SP": "JEENAPRIYA_I__SP", "RAVICHANDRAN_D__IND": "RAVICHANDRAN_D__IND", "PURUSHOTHAMAN_S__IND": "PURUSHOTHAMAN_S__IND", "MURTHY_G__IND": "MURTHY_G__IND", "DEIVA_SWARUP_CHANDRAN__IND": "DEIVA_SWARUP_CHANDRAN__IND", "BASKAR_E__IND": "BASKAR_E__IND", "KOTEESWARAN_MUNU__IND": "KOTEESWARAN_MUNU__IND", "SAMYDOSS__IND": "SAMYDOSS__IND", "BABU_V_S__DMK": "BABU_V_S__DMK", "VENKATESHBABU__ADMK": "VENKATESHBABU__ADMK", "JACQUELENE_GOMEZ__DMDK": "JACQUELENE_GOMEZ__DMDK", "ELUMALAI_V__BJP": "ELUMALAI_V__BJP", "KAMALAAKANNAN_J__SP": "KAMALAAKANNAN_J__SP", "RAJA_K__IND": "RAJA_K__IND", "PRATHABAN_S__IND": "PRATHABAN_S__IND", "VENKATESAN_G__IND": "VENKATESAN_G__IND", "BALACHANDAR_V_G__IND": "BALACHANDAR_V_G__IND", "SATHIYASEELAN_N__IND": "SATHIYASEELAN_N__IND", "BABU_M_R_S__IND": "BABU_M_R_S__IND", "VASANTHA_KUMARI_A__LJP": "VASANTHA_KUMARI_A__LJP", "SENTHIL_VADIVELAN_S_P__IND": "SENTHIL_VADIVELAN_S_P__IND", "BASKAR_B__IND": "BASKAR_B__IND", "SATHISH_KUMAR_V__IND": "SATHISH_KUMAR_V__IND", "GIRIJA__TNJC": "GIRIJA__TNJC", "AYYAVOO_V__IND": "AYYAVOO_V__IND", "SUGUMAR_P__IND": "SUGUMAR_P__IND", "KUMARAN_K__IND": "KUMARAN_K__IND", "GOPI_K__IND": "GOPI_K__IND", "PARITHI_ELLAMVAZHUTHI__DMK": "PARITHI_ELLAMVAZHUTHI__DMK", "SATHYA_C_E__MDMK": "SATHYA_C_E__MDMK", "ETHIRAJ_V__DMDK": "ETHIRAJ_V__DMDK", "SRIRANGAN_ALIAS_SRIRANGAN_PRAKASH__BJP": "SRIRANGAN_ALIAS_SRIRANGAN_PRAKASH__BJP", "ARUNKUMAR_S__BSP": "ARUNKUMAR_S__BSP", "VALLUVAN_A__IND": "VALLUVAN_A__IND", "ELAMBARETHY__IND": "ELAMBARETHY__IND", "SIVAKUMAR_V__IND": "SIVAKUMAR_V__IND", "GANGADURAI_S_P__IND": "GANGADURAI_S_P__IND", "SELVARAJ_P__LJP": "SELVARAJ_P__LJP", "CHANDRAN_M__IND": "CHANDRAN_M__IND", "SASIKUMAR_M__IND": "SASIKUMAR_M__IND", "GOPAL_K__IND": "GOPAL_K__IND", "ARCOT_VEERASAMY__DMK": "ARCOT_VEERASAMY__DMK", "VIJAYA_THAYANBAN__MDMK": "VIJAYA_THAYANBAN__MDMK", "RAJAMANY_K__LKPT": "RAJAMANY_K__LKPT", "HANDE_H_V__BJP": "HANDE_H_V__BJP", "SENTHAMARAI_KANNAN_K__DMDK": "SENTHAMARAI_KANNAN_K__DMDK", "LOGANATHAN_V__IND": "LOGANATHAN_V__IND", "BALAKRISHNAN_B__IND": "BALAKRISHNAN_B__IND", "NAGU_A__IND": "NAGU_A__IND", "PREMA_V__IND": "PREMA_V__IND", "HARI_T__IND": "HARI_T__IND", "SIVARAMAN_S__IND": "SIVARAMAN_S__IND", "SUGUMARAN_M__IND": "SUGUMARAN_M__IND", "NANMARAN_V__IND": "NANMARAN_V__IND", "SENTHIL_MURUGAN_S__IND": "SENTHIL_MURUGAN_S__IND", "KALAIRAJAN_V_P__ADMK": "KALAIRAJAN_V_P__ADMK", "ANBAZHAGAN_J__DMK": "ANBAZHAGAN_J__DMK", "PANDIAN_T__DMDK": "PANDIAN_T__DMDK", "ARVIND_S__LKPT": "ARVIND_S__LKPT", "MUKTHA_V_SRINIVASAN__BJP": "MUKTHA_V_SRINIVASAN__BJP", "VISWANATHAN_T__IND": "VISWANATHAN_T__IND", "RAJENDRA_PRASAD_S__BSP": "RAJENDRA_PRASAD_S__BSP", "RAJAN_R__IND": "RAJAN_R__IND", "ANBAZHAGAN_J__IND": "ANBAZHAGAN_J__IND", "DEVENDRAN_M__SP": "DEVENDRAN_M__SP", "HASAN_FAIZAL_L_S_M__IND": "HASAN_FAIZAL_L_S_M__IND", "NATARAJAN_V__IND": "NATARAJAN_V__IND", "APPU_VIMAL_J__IND": "APPU_VIMAL_J__IND", "MAHALINGAM_J_S__IND": "MAHALINGAM_J_S__IND", "PANDURANGAN_D_V__IND": "PANDURANGAN_D_V__IND", "DHANDAPANI_V_M__IND": "DHANDAPANI_V_M__IND", "STALIN_M_K__DMK": "STALIN_M_K__DMK", "ADHIRAJARAM__ADMK": "ADHIRAJARAM__ADMK", "THALAPATHY_M__DMDK": "THALAPATHY_M__DMDK", "SHRI_ISHRAYEL_MAHESWAR_A__LKPT": "SHRI_ISHRAYEL_MAHESWAR_A__LKPT", "SHIVALINGAM_M__BJP": "SHIVALINGAM_M__BJP", "PARBAN_D__IND": "PARBAN_D__IND", "SURESH_D__IND": "SURESH_D__IND", "PARTHASARATHY__IND": "PARTHASARATHY__IND", "MAHALINGAM_S__IND": "MAHALINGAM_S__IND", "JAYAKUMAR_T__IND": "JAYAKUMAR_T__IND", "NEELAN_G__IND": "NEELAN_G__IND", "DEVARAJAN_G__IND": "DEVARAJAN_G__IND", "KRISHNARAJA_G__IND": "KRISHNARAJA_G__IND", "BHAGAVATHI_M__IND": "BHAGAVATHI_M__IND", "SELVARAJ_K__IND": "SELVARAJ_K__IND", "PRABU_T__IND": "PRABU_T__IND", "MANI_D__IND": "MANI_D__IND", "MD_HASHIM__IND": "MD_HASHIM__IND", "RAJKAMAL_V__IND": "RAJKAMAL_V__IND", "CHANDRASEKARAN_P__IND": "CHANDRASEKARAN_P__IND", "GOVINDARAJAN_A__IND": "GOVINDARAJAN_A__IND", "GUNASEKARAN_R__IND": "GUNASEKARAN_R__IND", "THIRUMARAN_C__IND": "THIRUMARAN_C__IND", "RAJKUMAR_S__IND": "RAJKUMAR_S__IND", "MADHAVAN_R__IND": "MADHAVAN_R__IND", "MURTHY_P__IND": "MURTHY_P__IND", "KARUNANIDHI_M__DMK": "KARUNANIDHI_M__DMK", "DAWOON_MIAKHAN__IND": "DAWOON_MIAKHAN__IND", "NARAYANASAMY_B__DMDK": "NARAYANASAMY_B__DMDK", "SIVANESAN_R_N__BJP": "SIVANESAN_R_N__BJP", "ELANTHIRUMARAN__LKPT": "ELANTHIRUMARAN__LKPT", "MOHAMED_MEERA_A__IND": "MOHAMED_MEERA_A__IND", "MIA_KHAN__IND": "MIA_KHAN__IND", "SUBRAMANI_N__IND": "SUBRAMANI_N__IND", "KARUNANIDHI_M__IND": "KARUNANIDHI_M__IND", "DALIT_KUDIMAHAN_T_D_K_ALIAS_DAYA_KRISHNA__BSP": "DALIT_KUDIMAHAN_T_D_K_ALIAS_DAYA_KRISHNA__BSP", "SAI_GANESH__IND": "SAI_GANESH__IND", "PADMARAJAN_DR_K__IND": "PADMARAJAN_DR_K__IND", "JAFFAR_ALI_A__IND": "JAFFAR_ALI_A__IND", "BALAJI_VENKATESWARAN_G__IND": "BALAJI_VENKATESWARAN_G__IND", "BALAJI_B__RLD": "BALAJI_B__RLD", "RAGHURAMAN__IND": "RAGHURAMAN__IND", "AMEEDIUS_G__IND": "AMEEDIUS_G__IND", "SATHYAVELU_M__IND": "SATHYAVELU_M__IND", "VENUGOPAL_D_V__IND": "VENUGOPAL_D_V__IND", "SUBBIAH_J__IND": "SUBBIAH_J__IND", "BADER_SAYEED__ADMK": "BADER_SAYEED__ADMK", "NAGANATHAN_M__DMK": "NAGANATHAN_M__DMK", "SHIVAKUMAR_K__DMDK": "SHIVAKUMAR_K__DMDK", "SATHISH_KUMAR_S__BJP": "SATHISH_KUMAR_S__BJP", "VIVEKANANDAN_R__IND": "VIVEKANANDAN_R__IND", "SARAVANAN_K__BSP": "SARAVANAN_K__BSP", "SRINIVASAN_R__IND": "SRINIVASAN_R__IND", "SANTHANAM_M__IND": "SANTHANAM_M__IND", "SHANMUGAM_P__IND": "SHANMUGAM_P__IND", "SHEKHER_S_VE__ADMK": "SHEKHER_S_VE__ADMK", "NAPOLEON_D__DMK": "NAPOLEON_D__DMK", "SANTHANAGOPALAN__LKPT": "SANTHANAGOPALAN__LKPT", "RAJAN_V_N__DMDK": "RAJAN_V_N__DMDK", "CHANDRALEKHA_V_S__JP": "CHANDRALEKHA_V_S__JP", "NARAYANAN_AMERICAI_V__IND": "NARAYANAN_AMERICAI_V__IND", "VEERARAGHAVAN_P__IND": "VEERARAGHAVAN_P__IND", "PREMKUMAR_P__IND": "PREMKUMAR_P__IND", "ARUL_E__IND": "ARUL_E__IND", "SEKAR_C__IND": "SEKAR_C__IND", "PARTHIBAN_J__IND": "PARTHIBAN_J__IND", "MOHANRAJ_J__JJ": "MOHANRAJ_J__JJ", "DOMINIC__IND": "DOMINIC__IND", "CHANDRASEKAR_N__IND": "CHANDRASEKAR_N__IND", "GOKULNATHAN_B__IND": "GOKULNATHAN_B__IND", "DASAPRAKASH_T_S__RLD": "DASAPRAKASH_T_S__RLD", "SENTHAMIZHAN_G__ADMK": "SENTHAMIZHAN_G__ADMK", "BASKARAN_C_R__PMK": "BASKARAN_C_R__PMK", "VENUGOPAL_R__DMDK": "VENUGOPAL_R__DMDK", "RANGANATHAN_K__BJP": "RANGANATHAN_K__BJP", "RAVI_P_S__IND": "RAVI_P_S__IND", "NATARAJAN_G__IND": "NATARAJAN_G__IND", "KANDASAMY_P__IND": "KANDASAMY_P__IND", "MOHAN_M__IND": "MOHAN_M__IND", "RAMU_A__IND": "RAMU_A__IND", "VISWANATHAN_E__AIFB": "VISWANATHAN_E__AIFB", "SRIRAM_S__UCPI": "SRIRAM_S__UCPI", "SURESHBABU__IND": "SURESHBABU__IND", "MUNIAPPAN_M__IND": "MUNIAPPAN_M__IND", "JAISHANKAR_M__IND": "JAISHANKAR_M__IND", "TAMIL_SELVAN_M__IND": "TAMIL_SELVAN_M__IND", "PRAGALATHAN_M__IND": "PRAGALATHAN_M__IND", "ANANTHAKUMAR_G__IND": "ANANTHAKUMAR_G__IND", "VIJAYAKUMAR_S__IND": "VIJAYAKUMAR_S__IND", "THIRUVENGADAM_U__IND": "THIRUVENGADAM_U__IND", "RAJASEKAR__IND": "RAJASEKAR__IND", "ANAND_S__IND": "ANAND_S__IND", "VIJAYAKUMAR_K_S__ADMK": "VIJAYAKUMAR_K_S__ADMK", "DURAI_JEYAVELU__PMK": "DURAI_JEYAVELU__PMK", "SEKAR_C_H__DMDK": "SEKAR_C_H__DMDK", "SEKAR_R__IND": "SEKAR_R__IND", "SEKAR_K__SP": "SEKAR_K__SP", "MURUGESAN_T__IND": "MURUGESAN_T__IND", "NARASAIAH_L__BJP": "NARASAIAH_L__BJP", "MOHAMADYUSUF_A__NCP": "MOHAMADYUSUF_A__NCP", "ALEXANDER_A__BSP": "ALEXANDER_A__BSP", "BATHINNAIAH_V__IND": "BATHINNAIAH_V__IND", "SEKAR_K_C__IND": "SEKAR_K_C__IND", "PARASURAMAN_R__TNJC": "PARASURAMAN_R__TNJC", "RAGHUPATHY_G__IND": "RAGHUPATHY_G__IND", "SUNDARAMA_NAIDU_T__IND": "SUNDARAMA_NAIDU_T__IND", "GOPAL_G__IND": "GOPAL_G__IND", "BALARAMANAN_P__ADMK": "BALARAMANAN_P__ADMK", "ANBUVANAN_V__DMK": "ANBUVANAN_V__DMK", "ANGAMUTHU_S__DMDK": "ANGAMUTHU_S__DMDK", "MANI_E__IND": "MANI_E__IND", "JANAKIRAMAN_S__CPI_ML_L": "JANAKIRAMAN_S__CPI_ML_L", "NATARAJAN_S__BSP": "NATARAJAN_S__BSP", "ELUMALAI_K__IND": "ELUMALAI_K__IND", "SAMY_K_P_P__DMK": "SAMY_K_P_P__DMK", "MOORTHY_V__ADMK": "MOORTHY_V__ADMK", "MURUGAN_S__DMDK": "MURUGAN_S__DMDK", "GANESAN_K__BJP": "GANESAN_K__BJP", "BHUVANESWARAN_G__IND": "BHUVANESWARAN_G__IND", "SHANMUGAM_T_A__IND": "SHANMUGAM_T_A__IND", "RAJENDIRAN_A__AIFB": "RAJENDIRAN_A__AIFB", "SURESH_A__IND": "SURESH_A__IND", "RAJENDIRAN_N__IND": "RAJENDIRAN_N__IND", "RAJENDIRAN_V_S__IND": "RAJENDIRAN_V_S__IND", "ARUL_DOSS_J__IND": "ARUL_DOSS_J__IND", "RANGANATHAN_B__DMK": "RANGANATHAN_B__DMK", "KALAN_G__ADMK": "KALAN_G__ADMK", "VELMURUGAN_G__DMDK": "VELMURUGAN_G__DMDK", "RAVISUNDARAM_S__BJP": "RAVISUNDARAM_S__BJP", "PREMA_K__LKPT": "PREMA_K__LKPT", "THYAGARAJAN_J__IND": "THYAGARAJAN_J__IND", "SATHEESH_KUMAR_K_P__IND": "SATHEESH_KUMAR_K_P__IND", "MOHAN__IND": "MOHAN__IND", "SRINIVASAN_S__BSP": "SRINIVASAN_S__BSP", "SATHESH_KUMAR_S__IND": "SATHESH_KUMAR_S__IND", "MAHALAKSHIMI_B__SP": "MAHALAKSHIMI_B__SP", "PALANIVEL_K__CPI_ML_L": "PALANIVEL_K__CPI_ML_L", "GANESAN_K_R__AIFB": "GANESAN_K_R__AIFB", "VENKATESAN_N__LJP": "VENKATESAN_N__LJP", "JOSHI_K_A__IND": "JOSHI_K_A__IND", "KUMAR_N__IND": "KUMAR_N__IND", "BALAMURUGAN_B__IND": "BALAMURUGAN_B__IND", "MOHANKUMAR_S_P__IND": "MOHANKUMAR_S_P__IND", "KARUNAGARAN_P_V__IND": "KARUNAGARAN_P_V__IND", "RAJENDRAN_C__IND": "RAJENDRAN_C__IND", "ASHOK_S__IND": "ASHOK_S__IND", "GUNASEKARAN_M__IND": "GUNASEKARAN_M__IND", "ANBARASAN_T_M__DMK": "ANBARASAN_T_M__DMK", "VALARMATHI_B__ADMK": "VALARMATHI_B__ADMK", "VIJAYAKUMAR_R__DMDK": "VIJAYAKUMAR_R__DMDK", "RAJA_H__BJP": "RAJA_H__BJP", "VEMBULI_R__IND": "VEMBULI_R__IND", "ETHAYA_VENDAN_P__BSP": "ETHAYA_VENDAN_P__BSP", "GAJENDRA_KUMAR_D__IND": "GAJENDRA_KUMAR_D__IND", "AUGUSTIN_J__IND": "AUGUSTIN_J__IND", "RAMESH_K__IND": "RAMESH_K__IND", "VASANTHA_KUMAR_P__IND": "VASANTHA_KUMAR_P__IND", "VENKATESAN_M__IND": "VENKATESAN_M__IND", "MURUGAN_M__IND": "MURUGAN_M__IND", "SHANMUGAM_G__IND": "SHANMUGAM_G__IND", "MUNUSAMY_B__IND": "MUNUSAMY_B__IND", "ARUMUGAM_M__IND": "ARUMUGAM_M__IND", "RAJA_S_R__DMK": "RAJA_S_R__DMK", "SOMU_K__MDMK": "SOMU_K__MDMK", "DHARMA_K__DMDK": "DHARMA_K__DMDK", "SIVARAMAN_V_R__BJP": "SIVARAMAN_V_R__BJP", "AKBAR_M__TNJC": "AKBAR_M__TNJC", "SEKAR_V__SP": "SEKAR_V__SP", "SALEEM_M__IND": "SALEEM_M__IND", "ELIZABETH_RANI_P__IND": "ELIZABETH_RANI_P__IND", "RAJESH_N__IND": "RAJESH_N__IND", "MANIKANDAN_K__IND": "MANIKANDAN_K__IND", "PAKKIRI_A__IND": "PAKKIRI_A__IND", "PALRAJ_G__IND": "PALRAJ_G__IND", "NANDAKUMAR_P__IND": "NANDAKUMAR_P__IND", "KRISHNAN_M__IND": "KRISHNAN_M__IND", "MOORTHY_D__PMK": "MOORTHY_D__PMK", "DHANAPAL_M__ADMK": "DHANAPAL_M__ADMK", "KANNAPPAN_K__DMDK": "KANNAPPAN_K__DMDK", "PONVARATHARAJAN_M__BJP": "PONVARATHARAJAN_M__BJP", "SRINIVASAN_M__BSP": "SRINIVASAN_M__BSP", "ERANIAPPAN_C__CPI_ML_L": "ERANIAPPAN_C__CPI_ML_L", "JAGADEESAN_V__IND": "JAGADEESAN_V__IND", "BALU_V__LJP": "BALU_V__LJP", "PARKUNAN_S__IND": "PARKUNAN_S__IND", "SANDHIYAPPAN_S__IND": "SANDHIYAPPAN_S__IND", "DHANAPAL_K_S__IND": "DHANAPAL_K_S__IND", "ARUMUGAM_K__PMK": "ARUMUGAM_K__PMK", "ARUMUGAM_S__ADMK": "ARUMUGAM_S__ADMK", "MANJULA_S__DMDK": "MANJULA_S__DMDK", "JEEVARATHINAM_M__IND": "JEEVARATHINAM_M__IND", "PRAKASHBABU_P__IND": "PRAKASHBABU_P__IND", "SRIRAM_N__BJP": "SRIRAM_N__BJP", "AMOOR_BEEMRAO_A__BSP": "AMOOR_BEEMRAO_A__BSP", "VEDAPURI_M__PNK": "VEDAPURI_M__PNK", "DURAIRAJ_V__IND": "DURAIRAJ_V__IND", "PARAMASIVEM_N__TNJC": "PARAMASIVEM_N__TNJC", "THULASIAMMAL_R__SP": "THULASIAMMAL_R__SP", "GOVINDHAN_T__IND": "GOVINDHAN_T__IND", "ARASAN_A__IND": "ARASAN_A__IND", "CHITTYBABU_P__IND": "CHITTYBABU_P__IND", "ARUNAGIRI_K__IND": "ARUNAGIRI_K__IND", "GHAYATHRI_DEVI_K__INC": "GHAYATHRI_DEVI_K__INC", "APPADURAI_K__ADMK": "APPADURAI_K__ADMK", "GAJENDRAN_D__DMDK": "GAJENDRAN_D__DMDK", "SUNDARAMOORTHY_M__BJP": "SUNDARAMOORTHY_M__BJP", "MENAKA_S__IND": "MENAKA_S__IND", "NATARAJAN_C__IND": "NATARAJAN_C__IND", "DEVARAJ_M__IND": "DEVARAJ_M__IND", "RAJENDRABABU_P__BSP": "RAJENDRABABU_P__BSP", "SHANMUGAM_M__SP": "SHANMUGAM_M__SP", "AKBAR_K__TNJC": "AKBAR_K__TNJC", "SAMPATH_K_G__IND": "SAMPATH_K_G__IND", "SULTHANMOHIDEEN_A_L__IND": "SULTHANMOHIDEEN_A_L__IND", "RAMACHANDIRAN_S_P__IND": "RAMACHANDIRAN_S_P__IND", "LAKSHIMIPATHY_NAYAKER_R__VAK": "LAKSHIMIPATHY_NAYAKER_R__VAK", "SANKARA_VALLI_SANKARI_NARAYANAN__DMK": "SANKARA_VALLI_SANKARI_NARAYANAN__DMK", "SARASWATHI_M__ADMK": "SARASWATHI_M__ADMK", "KANTHAGURUNATHAN_S__DMDK": "KANTHAGURUNATHAN_S__DMDK", "BALASUNDARAM_R_K__IND": "BALASUNDARAM_R_K__IND", "SHANMUGAM_K_M__BJP": "SHANMUGAM_K_M__BJP", "ANANDAN_G__IND": "ANANDAN_G__IND", "SUNDAR_K__DMK": "SUNDAR_K__DMK", "SOMASUNDARAM_V__ADMK": "SOMASUNDARAM_V__ADMK", "MURUGESAN_D__DMDK": "MURUGESAN_D__DMDK", "VENKATESAN_K_K__IND": "VENKATESAN_K_K__IND", "LAKSHIMINARASIMAN_R__IND": "LAKSHIMINARASIMAN_R__IND", "RAJAVELU_T__BJP": "RAJAVELU_T__BJP", "GNANASEKARAN_K__SP": "GNANASEKARAN_K__SP", "NAGAPPAN_K__LJP": "NAGAPPAN_K__LJP", "RAMANATHAN_NAICKER_A__VAK": "RAMANATHAN_NAICKER_A__VAK", "RAJENDRAN_G__IND": "RAJENDRAN_G__IND", "SHANMUGAM_S_E__IND": "SHANMUGAM_S_E__IND", "KARTHIKEYAN_D__IND": "KARTHIKEYAN_D__IND", "KAMALAMBAL_P__PMK": "KAMALAMBAL_P__PMK", "MYTHILI_T__ADMK": "MYTHILI_T__ADMK", "EAGAMBARAM_S__DMDK": "EAGAMBARAM_S__DMDK", "MARI_G__IND": "MARI_G__IND", "RAGHAVAN_K_T__BJP": "RAGHAVAN_K_T__BJP", "MANOHARAN_T__IND": "MANOHARAN_T__IND", "IYYAPPAN_K__IND": "IYYAPPAN_K__IND", "SUBBAN_M__LJP": "SUBBAN_M__LJP", "SANKAR_M__IND": "SANKAR_M__IND", "SHANMUGAM_V__IND": "SHANMUGAM_V__IND", "SANKAR_V__IND": "SANKAR_V__IND", "KUPPAN_K__IND": "KUPPAN_K__IND", "YASODHA_D__INC": "YASODHA_D__INC", "BALAKRISHNAN_K__VCK": "BALAKRISHNAN_K__VCK", "PALANI_C__DMDK": "PALANI_C__DMDK", "SIVAKUMAR_G__BJP": "SIVAKUMAR_G__BJP", "RANGANATHAN_R__IND": "RANGANATHAN_R__IND", "ANBAZAGAN_A__IND": "ANBAZAGAN_A__IND", "KADIRVELU_M__IND": "KADIRVELU_M__IND", "SHANMUGAM_V_K__IND": "SHANMUGAM_V_K__IND", "SUDARSANAM_D__INC": "SUDARSANAM_D__INC", "SENGUTTUVAN_R__MDMK": "SENGUTTUVAN_R__MDMK", "CHANDRASEKAR_G__DMDK": "CHANDRASEKAR_G__DMDK", "MANOHARAN_N__BJP": "MANOHARAN_N__BJP", "JOTHIMANI_A_G__IND": "JOTHIMANI_A_G__IND", "JAYAKUMAR_P__BSP": "JAYAKUMAR_P__BSP", "RAYER_M__IND": "RAYER_M__IND", "VENKATESAN_K__IND": "VENKATESAN_K__IND", "SARAVANAN_M__IND": "SARAVANAN_M__IND", "PARTHASARATHY_K__IND": "PARTHASARATHY_K__IND", "VASUDEVAN_J__IND": "VASUDEVAN_J__IND", "MASILAMANI_N__IND": "MASILAMANI_N__IND", "SHIVAJI_E_A_P__DMK": "SHIVAJI_E_A_P__DMK", "RAMANA_B__ADMK": "RAMANA_B__ADMK", "PARATHASARATHI_B__DMDK": "PARATHASARATHI_B__DMDK", "JEGAJEEVANRAM_S__IND": "JEGAJEEVANRAM_S__IND", "VEERAMANI_R_S__BJP": "VEERAMANI_R_S__BJP", "VASAN_M__IND": "VASAN_M__IND", "SRINIVASAN_D__BSP": "SRINIVASAN_D__BSP", "CHIDHAMBARAM_S__IND": "CHIDHAMBARAM_S__IND", "SURIYAKUMAR_N__SP": "SURIYAKUMAR_N__SP", "MANI_L__IND": "MANI_L__IND", "SAGARIYA_D__IND": "SAGARIYA_D__IND", "SENTHIL_KUMAR_M__LJP": "SENTHIL_KUMAR_M__LJP", "ANBU_V__IND": "ANBU_V__IND", "RADHAKRISHNAN_D__IND": "RADHAKRISHNAN_D__IND", "HARI_G__ADMK": "HARI_G__ADMK", "ERAVIRAJ_G__PMK": "ERAVIRAJ_G__PMK", "SEKAR_R__DMDK": "SEKAR_R__DMDK", "RAJAPANDIYAN_D__IND": "RAJAPANDIYAN_D__IND", "SIRANJEEVULU_P__BJP": "SIRANJEEVULU_P__BJP", "RAGHU_G__IND": "RAGHU_G__IND", "HARI_C__IND": "HARI_C__IND", "PURUSHOTHAMAN_J__IND": "PURUSHOTHAMAN_J__IND", "RAVI_G_V__IND": "RAVI_G_V__IND", "SATHISHKUMAR_G__IND": "SATHISHKUMAR_G__IND", "JAYARAJ_D__BSP": "JAYARAJ_D__BSP", "ARPUTHAMMAL_G__IND": "ARPUTHAMMAL_G__IND", "KALAIVANAN_R__IND": "KALAIVANAN_R__IND", "DEVIKUMARI__IND": "DEVIKUMARI__IND", "RAMAN_E_S_S__INC": "RAMAN_E_S_S__INC", "NARASIMHAN_P_M__ADMK": "NARASIMHAN_P_M__ADMK", "NETHAJI_V__DMDK": "NETHAJI_V__DMDK", "VELU_A__IND": "VELU_A__IND", "RADHAKRISHNAN_R__BJP": "RADHAKRISHNAN_R__BJP", "PONRAMAR_S__IND": "PONRAMAR_S__IND", "KUMAR_V_G__IND": "KUMAR_V_G__IND", "VINAYAGAM_T_D__LJP": "VINAYAGAM_T_D__LJP", "RAMESH_KUMAR_M__IND": "RAMESH_KUMAR_M__IND", "SREENIVASALU_S__IND": "SREENIVASALU_S__IND", "CHINNAPPAN_M__IND": "CHINNAPPAN_M__IND", "JAGANMOORTHY_M__DMK": "JAGANMOORTHY_M__DMK", "RAVI_S__ADMK": "RAVI_S__ADMK", "USHA_RANI_R__DMDK": "USHA_RANI_R__DMDK", "RAVI_V__IND": "RAVI_V__IND", "VIJAYAN_C__BJP": "VIJAYAN_C__BJP", "AMUTHA_M__SP": "AMUTHA_M__SP", "BABU_C__IND": "BABU_C__IND", "MOHAN_S__IND": "MOHAN_S__IND", "DHANAPAL_M__IND": "DHANAPAL_M__IND", "ANNADURAI_P__IND": "ANNADURAI_P__IND", "SAMPATH_K__IND": "SAMPATH_K__IND", "KOTHANDAN_S__IND": "KOTHANDAN_S__IND", "ANBU_S__IND": "ANBU_S__IND", "ARUL_ANBARASU_D__INC": "ARUL_ANBARASU_D__INC", "GOPAL_C__ADMK": "GOPAL_C__ADMK", "PRABAKARAN_C_D__DMDK": "PRABAKARAN_C_D__DMDK", "VELU_V__IND": "VELU_V__IND", "GOPI_R__SP": "GOPI_R__SP", "MURUGESAN_D__BJP": "MURUGESAN_D__BJP", "SURESH_S__IND": "SURESH_S__IND", "DEVAN_P__LJP": "DEVAN_P__LJP", "KRISHNAN_S__IND": "KRISHNAN_S__IND", "GANDHI_R__DMK": "GANDHI_R__DMK", "THAMIZHARASAN_R__ADMK": "THAMIZHARASAN_R__ADMK", "PAARI_N__DMDK": "PAARI_N__DMDK", "SHAKTHIVEL_NATHAN_K__IND": "SHAKTHIVEL_NATHAN_K__IND", "RAJESH_KUMAR_R__IND": "RAJESH_KUMAR_R__IND", "KUPPUSAMY_V__BJP": "KUPPUSAMY_V__BJP", "TAMILARASAN_S__IND": "TAMILARASAN_S__IND", "NAGARATHINAM_M__IND": "NAGARATHINAM_M__IND", "ARUMUGAM_K__IND": "ARUMUGAM_K__IND", "SUNDARAVATHANAM_A__IND": "SUNDARAVATHANAM_A__IND", "ELAVAZHAGAN_K_L__PMK": "ELAVAZHAGAN_K_L__PMK", "CHANDRAN_V_R__ADMK": "CHANDRAN_V_R__ADMK", "VELU_V_B__DMDK": "VELU_V_B__DMDK", "SEDHUMADAVAN_S__SP": "SEDHUMADAVAN_S__SP", "KUPPUSAMY_P__IND": "KUPPUSAMY_P__IND", "THIYAGARAJAN_S__BJP": "THIYAGARAJAN_S__BJP", "KUBENDIRAN_V__IND": "KUBENDIRAN_V__IND", "MUNISAMY_C__LJP": "MUNISAMY_C__LJP", "DURAIMURUGAN__DMK": "DURAIMURUGAN__DMK", "NARAYANAN_B__ADMK": "NARAYANAN_B__ADMK", "RADHAKRISHANAN_S__DMDK": "RADHAKRISHANAN_S__DMDK", "SURESH_V_R__BJP": "SURESH_V_R__BJP", "JAGANATHAN_K__IND": "JAGANATHAN_K__IND", "STEEPAN_V_K__SP": "STEEPAN_V_K__SP", "MURALI_V__IND": "MURALI_V__IND", "MUTHIYAL_M__IND": "MUTHIYAL_M__IND", "PERRINBAM_A__IND": "PERRINBAM_A__IND", "PANDURANGAN_P__IND": "PANDURANGAN_P__IND", "PANCHATCHARAM_K__IND": "PANCHATCHARAM_K__IND", "KANNAN_K_A__IND": "KANNAN_K_A__IND", "LATHA_G__CPM": "LATHA_G__CPM", "PALANI_J_K_N__ADMK": "PALANI_J_K_N__ADMK", "SUDHISH_L_K__DMDK": "SUDHISH_L_K__DMDK", "NATARAJAN_S__IND": "NATARAJAN_S__IND", "GOVINDARAJI_P_V__SP": "GOVINDARAJI_P_V__SP", "KUMARAVELU_K_S__BJP": "KUMARAVELU_K_S__BJP", "KARUNANIDHI_E__BSP": "KARUNANIDHI_E__BSP", "GOVINDASAMY_M__IND": "GOVINDASAMY_M__IND", "SANKARAN_V_P__IND": "SANKARAN_V_P__IND", "TAMILSELVAN_V__IND": "TAMILSELVAN_V__IND", "CHINNASAMY_A__DMK": "CHINNASAMY_A__DMK", "CHANDRA_SETTU_S__ADMK": "CHANDRA_SETTU_S__ADMK", "KANDAPPAN_H__DMDK": "KANDAPPAN_H__DMDK", "CHINNUSWAMY__IND": "CHINNUSWAMY__IND", "SUBRAMANI_P__BSP": "SUBRAMANI_P__BSP", "PANNEERSELVAM_R__BJP": "PANNEERSELVAM_R__BJP", "KARUNANITHI_S__IND": "KARUNANITHI_S__IND", "ABDUL_BASITH_H__DMK": "ABDUL_BASITH_H__DMK", "MOHAMED_ALI_K__ADMK": "MOHAMED_ALI_K__ADMK", "ANWAR_UL_HAQUY_K__DMDK": "ANWAR_UL_HAQUY_K__DMDK", "RADHAKRISHANAN_N__IND": "RADHAKRISHANAN_N__IND", "ANANDAN_K__BJP": "ANANDAN_K__BJP", "JAISANKAR_G_S__ABHM": "JAISANKAR_G_S__ABHM", "RAJENDIRAN_P__BSP": "RAJENDIRAN_P__BSP", "NAGAPPAN_M__IND": "NAGAPPAN_M__IND", "SYED_MAROOF_AHMED__IND": "SYED_MAROOF_AHMED__IND", "SOORIYAKUMAR_N_K_R__DMK": "SOORIYAKUMAR_N_K_R__DMK", "SUBRAMANI_K_G__ADMK": "SUBRAMANI_K_G__ADMK", "FAYAS_BASHA_A__DMDK": "FAYAS_BASHA_A__DMDK", "PUSHPARAJ_P__BJP": "PUSHPARAJ_P__BJP", "VARADHARAJAN_S__IND": "VARADHARAJAN_S__IND", "PRAKASAM_M__IND": "PRAKASAM_M__IND", "SHAMARAJ_K__IND": "SHAMARAJ_K__IND", "PERUMAL_K__NCP": "PERUMAL_K__NCP", "RAMAMOORTHY_K__BSP": "RAMAMOORTHY_K__BSP", "DEVARAJ_K__IND": "DEVARAJ_K__IND", "CHINNATHAMBI_K__IND": "CHINNATHAMBI_K__IND", "RAJA_T_K__PMK": "RAJA_T_K__PMK", "AZHAGIRI_K_C__MDMK": "AZHAGIRI_K_C__MDMK", "SENTHILKUMAR_B_S__DMDK": "SENTHILKUMAR_B_S__DMDK", "SHIVASHANMUKAM_D__BJP": "SHIVASHANMUKAM_D__BJP", "AMUDANANDAN_D_N__IND": "AMUDANANDAN_D_N__IND", "MANI_K_E__IND": "MANI_K_E__IND", "GOPINATHAN_H__SP": "GOPINATHAN_H__SP", "SARAVANAN_T_R__BSP": "SARAVANAN_T_R__BSP", "SEKAR_N__IND": "SEKAR_N__IND", "THANGARAJ_P__IND": "THANGARAJ_P__IND", "POLUR_VARADHAN_M__INC": "POLUR_VARADHAN_M__INC", "SAKTHIVEL_P__VCK": "SAKTHIVEL_P__VCK", "SURESH_T__DMDK": "SURESH_T__DMDK", "THIRUPPATHI_V__BJP": "THIRUPPATHI_V__BJP", "JAGANATHAN_R__BSP": "JAGANATHAN_R__BSP", "RAMASAMY_V__IND": "RAMASAMY_V__IND", "SHAMALA_R__SP": "SHAMALA_R__SP", "SAROJA_B__IND": "SAROJA_B__IND", "VELU_E_V__DMK": "VELU_E_V__DMK", "RAMACHANDRAN_S__ADMK": "RAMACHANDRAN_S__ADMK", "MOHAMMAD_M__DMDK": "MOHAMMAD_M__DMDK", "MURUGESAN_A__IND": "MURUGESAN_A__IND", "KUPPAN_M__SP": "KUPPAN_M__SP", "DHARUMAN_M_R__BJP": "DHARUMAN_M_R__BJP", "RAJENDRAN_A_N__IND": "RAJENDRAN_A_N__IND", "PALANI_MOHAN_P__IND": "PALANI_MOHAN_P__IND", "BASKARAN_M_R__BSP": "BASKARAN_M_R__BSP", "MAYAVAN_N__IND": "MAYAVAN_N__IND", "MANI_M__IND": "MANI_M__IND", "SEKAR_G__IND": "SEKAR_G__IND", "KUZHENTHAI_R__IND": "KUZHENTHAI_R__IND", "ANNAMALAI_M__IND": "ANNAMALAI_M__IND", "PITCHANDI_K__DMK": "PITCHANDI_K__DMK", "PAVAN_KUMAR_V__ADMK": "PAVAN_KUMAR_V__ADMK", "KUMARAN_S__DMDK": "KUMARAN_S__DMDK", "NARAYANA_GANDHI_GANDHI_G__BJP": "NARAYANA_GANDHI_GANDHI_G__BJP", "KALINGAN_A__SP": "KALINGAN_A__SP", "PICHANDI_E__IND": "PICHANDI_E__IND", "RAMESH_S__IND": "RAMESH_S__IND", "BASKARAN_N__IND": "BASKARAN_N__IND", "EZILMARAN_M__IND": "EZILMARAN_M__IND", "ARUMUGAM_A__IND": "ARUMUGAM_A__IND", "THANGAVELU_K__IND": "THANGAVELU_K__IND", "KRISHNAMOORTHY_P__IND": "KRISHNAMOORTHY_P__IND", "SUBRAMANI_K__IND": "SUBRAMANI_K__IND", "SASIKUMAR_P__IND": "SASIKUMAR_P__IND", "KRISHNAMURTHY_AGRI_S_S__ADMK": "KRISHNAMURTHY_AGRI_S_S__ADMK", "KALODOSS_R__PMK": "KALODOSS_R__PMK", "SANKAR_L__DMDK": "SANKAR_L__DMDK", "JAGADEESWARAN_M__IND": "JAGADEESWARAN_M__IND", "RAMAKRISHNAN_V__BJP": "RAMAKRISHNAN_V__BJP", "ARUMUGAM_S__IND": "ARUMUGAM_S__IND", "SELVARAJ_S__IND": "SELVARAJ_S__IND", "SEKAR_V__IND": "SEKAR_V__IND", "VIJAYALAKSHMI_M__SP": "VIJAYALAKSHMI_M__SP", "KOTHANDAPANI_B__IND": "KOTHANDAPANI_B__IND", "VIJAYAKUMAR_P_S__INC": "VIJAYAKUMAR_P_S__INC", "VEDIYAPPAN_T__ADMK": "VEDIYAPPAN_T__ADMK", "PURUSHOTHAMAN_S_C__DMDK": "PURUSHOTHAMAN_S_C__DMDK", "ELANGESWARAN_G__BJP": "ELANGESWARAN_G__BJP", "LAKSHMANAN_M_B__IND": "LAKSHMANAN_M_B__IND", "SHANMUGAM_G__SP": "SHANMUGAM_G__SP", "DURAIRAJ_M__IND": "DURAIRAJ_M__IND", "SANKAR_C__IND": "SANKAR_C__IND", "PANDURANGAN_K__ADMK": "PANDURANGAN_K__ADMK", "VARALAKSHMI_M__PMK": "VARALAKSHMI_M__PMK", "VENKATASAN_M__DMDK": "VENKATASAN_M__DMDK", "VEERAMANI_G__IND": "VEERAMANI_G__IND", "KUMARESAN_J__BJP": "KUMARESAN_J__BJP", "PANNEERSELVAM_S__IND": "PANNEERSELVAM_S__IND", "SIVAM_C__BSP": "SIVAM_C__BSP", "NATARAJAN_T__IND": "NATARAJAN_T__IND", "DEIVASIGAMANI_B__IND": "DEIVASIGAMANI_B__IND", "KALAISELVAN_V__IND": "KALAISELVAN_V__IND", "GNANASEKARAN_C__INC": "GNANASEKARAN_C__INC", "SUBRAMANI_N__MDMK": "SUBRAMANI_N__MDMK", "RAVI_G_G__SP": "RAVI_G_G__SP", "RAJENDERAN_A__DMDK": "RAJENDERAN_A__DMDK", "KALAISELVI_K__BJP": "KALAISELVI_K__BJP", "JAYAPRAKASH_P_P__IND": "JAYAPRAKASH_P_P__IND", "BABU_J__IND": "BABU_J__IND", "SALMA_S__IND": "SALMA_S__IND", "VASUGI_V__IND": "VASUGI_V__IND", "KARTHIGEYAN_B__IND": "KARTHIGEYAN_B__IND", "NEETHIVENTHAN_E__IND": "NEETHIVENTHAN_E__IND", "SIVANANDAM_R__DMK": "SIVANANDAM_R__DMK", "SANTHANAM_A__ADMK": "SANTHANAM_A__ADMK", "RAMESH_D__DMDK": "RAMESH_D__DMDK", "GANGADHARAN_E__PNK": "GANGADHARAN_E__PNK", "NALLATHAMBI_R__IND": "NALLATHAMBI_R__IND", "NARAYANAN_K__BJP": "NARAYANAN_K__BJP", "THIRUGNANAM_D__IND": "THIRUGNANAM_D__IND", "VISHNUPRASAD_M_K__INC": "VISHNUPRASAD_M_K__INC", "PAVAI_R__ADMK": "PAVAI_R__ADMK", "SUBAMANGALAM_D__DMDK": "SUBAMANGALAM_D__DMDK", "RAVICHANDRAN_V__IND": "RAVICHANDRAN_V__IND", "LAKSHMANAN_G__BJP": "LAKSHMANAN_G__BJP", "PASAMIGU_ANNAN_VENKATESANNAR__IND": "PASAMIGU_ANNAN_VENKATESANNAR__IND", "TAMIZHINIYAN_T__IND": "TAMIZHINIYAN_T__IND", "PARTHASARATHY_N__IND": "PARTHASARATHY_N__IND", "DURAIKANNAN_M__IND": "DURAIKANNAN_M__IND", "DASS_U__IND": "DASS_U__IND", "JAYARAMAN_S_P__DMK": "JAYARAMAN_S_P__DMK", "CHAKKRAPANI_M__ADMK": "CHAKKRAPANI_M__ADMK", "SIVASHANMUGAM_N__DMDK": "SIVASHANMUGAM_N__DMDK", "JAYARAMAN_S__IND": "JAYARAMAN_S__IND", "RAJASEKAR_K__BJP": "RAJASEKAR_K__BJP", "MOHAN_M__SP": "MOHAN_M__SP", "MASILAMANI_M__IND": "MASILAMANI_M__IND", "RAVI_M__IND": "RAVI_M__IND", "SASIKUMAR_V__IND": "SASIKUMAR_V__IND", "EDIROLIMANIAN_G__PMK": "EDIROLIMANIAN_G__PMK", "ANBALAGAN_A_K_S__ADMK": "ANBALAGAN_A_K_S__ADMK", "GOPINATHAN_A__DMDK": "GOPINATHAN_A__DMDK", "MANI_L_K__IND": "MANI_L_K__IND", "ANBUKANNAN_K__BSP": "ANBUKANNAN_K__BSP", "VENGATESAN_P_M__BJP": "VENGATESAN_P_M__BJP", "MANI_K__IND": "MANI_K__IND", "DHANUSU_R__IND": "DHANUSU_R__IND", "SENTHAMIZHSELVAN_P__PMK": "SENTHAMIZHSELVAN_P__PMK", "TAMILMOZHI_RAJADATHAN_TMT_R__ADMK": "TAMILMOZHI_RAJADATHAN_TMT_R__ADMK", "CHANDIRA_DASS_C__DMDK": "CHANDIRA_DASS_C__DMDK", "MARIYAPPAN_S__IND": "MARIYAPPAN_S__IND", "ANTHONY_MARY_TMT_M__IND": "ANTHONY_MARY_TMT_M__IND", "MANIMARAN_S_R__IND": "MANIMARAN_S_R__IND", "DURAIKKANNU_T__BSP": "DURAIKKANNU_T__BSP", "BHASKARAN_B__BJP": "BHASKARAN_B__BJP", "KANNAN_M__IND": "KANNAN_M__IND", "CHANDRASEKARAN_C__SP": "CHANDRASEKARAN_C__SP", "THANGAVELU_R__IND": "THANGAVELU_R__IND", "GOVINDARASU_K__IND": "GOVINDARASU_K__IND", "KANNAN_V__DMK": "KANNAN_V__DMK", "MASILAMANI_DR_R__MDMK": "MASILAMANI_DR_R__MDMK", "RAJENDRAN_D__DMDK": "RAJENDRAN_D__DMDK", "MANIVANNAN_R__IND": "MANIVANNAN_R__IND", "RAJENDERAN_M_S__BJP": "RAJENDERAN_M_S__BJP", "KALIYAMURTHI_G__BSP": "KALIYAMURTHI_G__BSP", "GANESAN_C__IND": "GANESAN_C__IND", "POONGAVANAM_P__IND": "POONGAVANAM_P__IND", "SHANMUGAM_C_VE__ADMK": "SHANMUGAM_C_VE__ADMK", "KARUNANITHI_M__PMK": "KARUNANITHI_M__PMK", "LAKSHMANAN_K__DMDK": "LAKSHMANAN_K__DMDK", "MANICKAM_K__IND": "MANICKAM_K__IND", "THANASEKARAN_S__IND": "THANASEKARAN_S__IND", "SEKAR_NAYAKAR_I_M__BJP": "SEKAR_NAYAKAR_I_M__BJP", "GANESAN_R__IND": "GANESAN_R__IND", "INIYADHAYALAN_G__IND": "INIYADHAYALAN_G__IND", "STEEPHAN_RAJ_S__BSP": "STEEPHAN_RAJ_S__BSP", "SUBRAMANIYAN_E__IND": "SUBRAMANIYAN_E__IND", "SATHIYAMOORTHY_A__IND": "SATHIYAMOORTHY_A__IND", "GANAPATHY_N__ADMK": "GANAPATHY_N__ADMK", "SOUNDARARAJAN_N__PMK": "SOUNDARARAJAN_N__PMK", "RAJA_K__DMDK": "RAJA_K__DMDK", "JAYAPAL_M__IND": "JAYAPAL_M__IND", "GOVINDASAMY_A__BSP": "GOVINDASAMY_A__BSP", "PARAMASIVAM_D__BJP": "PARAMASIVAM_D__BJP", "KOTHANDARAMAN_S__IND": "KOTHANDARAMAN_S__IND", "KUMARASELVAM_M__IND": "KUMARASELVAM_M__IND", "AYYAPPAN_V__IND": "AYYAPPAN_V__IND", "PUSHPARAJ_S__DMK": "PUSHPARAJ_S__DMK", "SUBRAMANIYAN_V__ADMK": "SUBRAMANIYAN_V__ADMK", "RAJACHANDRA_SEKAR_P__DMDK": "RAJACHANDRA_SEKAR_P__DMDK", "VEERAMUTHU_V__IND": "VEERAMUTHU_V__IND", "PALARAMAN_K__AIVP": "PALARAMAN_K__AIVP", "SELVAM_P__BSP": "SELVAM_P__BSP", "DEVI_K__BJP": "DEVI_K__BJP", "SUDHAKAR_S__IND": "SUDHAKAR_S__IND", "SAKTHIVEL_J_M__IND": "SAKTHIVEL_J_M__IND", "TAMILARASAN_B__IND": "TAMILARASAN_B__IND", "SUBRAMANI_E__IND": "SUBRAMANI_E__IND", "PONMUDY_K__DMK": "PONMUDY_K__DMK", "PASUPATHY_R__ADMK": "PASUPATHY_R__ADMK", "DURAISAMY_D__DMDK": "DURAISAMY_D__DMDK", "VETRISELVAN_V__IND": "VETRISELVAN_V__IND", "SUKUMAR_V__BJP": "SUKUMAR_V__BJP", "MOHAMAD_JAKKIRIYA_M__IND": "MOHAMAD_JAKKIRIYA_M__IND", "VAIKUNTHAN_V__BSP": "VAIKUNTHAN_V__BSP", "PRAKASAM_V__IND": "PRAKASAM_V__IND", "MOHAMED_ALI_JINNA_M__IND": "MOHAMED_ALI_JINNA_M__IND", "ELANTHIRAIYAN_D__IND": "ELANTHIRAIYAN_D__IND", "PALANI_G__IND": "PALANI_G__IND", "KALIYAMOORTHY_E__IND": "KALIYAMOORTHY_E__IND", "SADAGOPAN_K__IND": "SADAGOPAN_K__IND", "KALIYAVARATHAN_V_A_T__PMK": "KALIYAVARATHAN_V_A_T__PMK", "SINTHANAISELVAN__VCK": "SINTHANAISELVAN__VCK", "VENGATESAN_L__DMDK": "VENGATESAN_L__DMDK", "SAMBATH_A_G__IND": "SAMBATH_A_G__IND", "RAGU_N__IND": "RAGU_N__IND", "SAMPATH_A_V__IND": "SAMPATH_A_V__IND", "SAMPATH_R__IND": "SAMPATH_R__IND", "KRISHNAMOORTHY_R__IND": "KRISHNAMOORTHY_R__IND", "SAKTHIVEL_R__IND": "SAKTHIVEL_R__IND", "KUMAR_K__SP": "KUMAR_K__SP", "SAMPATH_V__IND": "SAMPATH_V__IND", "NAGESWARARAO_S_U__BSP": "NAGESWARARAO_S_U__BSP", "JAYAKUMAR_K_P_J__BJP": "JAYAKUMAR_K_P_J__BJP", "KUMARAGURU_R__ADMK": "KUMARAGURU_R__ADMK", "VEERAPANDIAN_V_S__DMK": "VEERAPANDIAN_V_S__DMK", "UDHAYAKUMAR_M_S__DMDK": "UDHAYAKUMAR_M_S__DMDK", "VERAPATHIRAN_M__IND": "VERAPATHIRAN_M__IND", "MUTHUKUMAR_B__BJP": "MUTHUKUMAR_B__BJP", "PARTHEBAN_A__BSP": "PARTHEBAN_A__BSP", "PANDURNGAN_G_M__IND": "PANDURNGAN_G_M__IND", "SAMYKANNU_N__SP": "SAMYKANNU_N__SP", "VIJAYARAGAVAN_D__IND": "VIJAYARAGAVAN_D__IND", "KUMARAGURU_S__IND": "KUMARAGURU_S__IND", "PERIYASAMY_R__IND": "PERIYASAMY_R__IND", "ARUL_NEHRU_M_V__IND": "ARUL_NEHRU_M_V__IND", "THIRUNAVUKARASU_K__DMK": "THIRUNAVUKARASU_K__DMK", "VIJAYARAGHAVAN_E__VCK": "VIJAYARAGHAVAN_E__VCK", "SHANMUGAM_C__DMDK": "SHANMUGAM_C__DMDK", "RAMALINGAM_V__BJP": "RAMALINGAM_V__BJP", "KANNAN_A__IND": "KANNAN_A__IND", "RAJENDRAN_SABA__DMK": "RAJENDRAN_SABA__DMK", "SABAPATHI_MOHAN_R_T__MDMK": "SABAPATHI_MOHAN_R_T__MDMK", "SIVAKOLUNTHU_P__DMDK": "SIVAKOLUNTHU_P__DMDK", "SUGUMARAN_J__BJP": "SUGUMARAN_J__BJP", "IYAPPAN_K__BSP": "IYAPPAN_K__BSP", "SARANGAPANI_P__IND": "SARANGAPANI_P__IND", "KALIYAMOORTHY_N__CPI_ML_L": "KALIYAMOORTHY_N__CPI_ML_L", "KUMAR_A_K__SP": "KUMAR_A_K__SP", "ARULMURUGAN_K__IND": "ARULMURUGAN_K__IND", "IYAPPAN_G__DMK": "IYAPPAN_G__DMK", "KUMAR_G__ADMK": "KUMAR_G__ADMK", "JAYAKUMAR_G_V__DMDK": "JAYAKUMAR_G_V__DMDK", "SIVAKUMAR_P__BJP": "SIVAKUMAR_P__BJP", "SRIRAMULU_S__IND": "SRIRAMULU_S__IND", "SRIVATHSAN_J__IND": "SRIVATHSAN_J__IND", "AMUDHAN_A__BSP": "AMUDHAN_A__BSP", "SRIDHAR_G__IND": "SRIDHAR_G__IND", "ARUMUGAM_M__AIFB": "ARUMUGAM_M__AIFB", "VELMURUGAN_T__PMK": "VELMURUGAN_T__PMK", "RAJENDIRAN_R__ADMK": "RAJENDIRAN_R__ADMK", "RAMACHANDRAN_S__DMDK": "RAMACHANDRAN_S__DMDK", "BALU_S__IND": "BALU_S__IND", "KUMARAGURU_V_K__IND": "KUMARAGURU_V_K__IND", "SELVAKUMAR_R_M__BJP": "SELVAKUMAR_R_M__BJP", "RAMAMOORTHY_G__BSP": "RAMAMOORTHY_G__BSP", "KAMALAKANNAN_C__IND": "KAMALAKANNAN_C__IND", "PANNEERSELVAM_M_R_K__DMK": "PANNEERSELVAM_M_R_K__DMK", "RAMALINGAM_N__MDMK": "RAMALINGAM_N__MDMK", "SUNDARAMOORTHY_R__DMDK": "SUNDARAMOORTHY_R__DMDK", "SARAVANASUNDARAM_D__BJP": "SARAVANASUNDARAM_D__BJP", "HARI_KRISHNAN_G__BSP": "HARI_KRISHNAN_G__BSP", "KALIYAMOORTHY_C__RSP": "KALIYAMOORTHY_C__RSP", "BALASUBRAMANIAN_A__IND": "BALASUBRAMANIAN_A__IND", "PAZHNI_MURUGAN_V__IND": "PAZHNI_MURUGAN_V__IND", "KANTHARAJAN_B__IND": "KANTHARAJAN_B__IND", "CHANDRA_P__IND": "CHANDRA_P__IND", "MURALIDHARAN_S__JD_U": "MURALIDHARAN_S__JD_U", "KANNAPPAN_R__IND": "KANNAPPAN_R__IND", "SELVI_RAMAJAYAM__ADMK": "SELVI_RAMAJAYAM__ADMK", "DEVADASS_K__PMK": "DEVADASS_K__PMK", "SHAFIUDDIN_S__DMDK": "SHAFIUDDIN_S__DMDK", "ELUMALAI_S__BJP": "ELUMALAI_S__BJP", "VENKATACHALAPATHY_R__IND": "VENKATACHALAPATHY_R__IND", "BABU_S__IND": "BABU_S__IND", "JAYABALAN_K__BSP": "JAYABALAN_K__BSP", "BHUVANENDIRAN_A_G__IND": "BHUVANENDIRAN_A_G__IND", "VENKATESAN_V__SP": "VENKATESAN_V__SP", "RADHAKRISHNAN_R__IND": "RADHAKRISHNAN_R__IND", "BALASUBRAMANIYAN_K__IND": "BALASUBRAMANIYAN_K__IND", "BATCHAMIYAN_S__IND": "BATCHAMIYAN_S__IND", "ARUMUGAM_R__AIFB": "ARUMUGAM_R__AIFB", "SELVI_M__IND": "SELVI_M__IND", "RAVIKUMAR_D__VCK": "RAVIKUMAR_D__VCK", "VALLALPERUMAN_P__INC": "VALLALPERUMAN_P__INC", "UMANATH_R__DMDK": "UMANATH_R__DMDK", "SELLAKKANNU_S__AIVP": "SELLAKKANNU_S__AIVP", "VETRIKUMAR_P__IND": "VETRIKUMAR_P__IND", "VASANTHAKUMAR_A__BJP": "VASANTHAKUMAR_A__BJP", "MURUGANATHAM_M__IND": "MURUGANATHAM_M__IND", "BALAGURU_A__BSP": "BALAGURU_A__BSP", "ARUNMOZHIDEVAN_A__ADMK": "ARUNMOZHIDEVAN_A__ADMK", "BALAKRISHNAN_K__CPM": "BALAKRISHNAN_K__CPM", "RAJAMANNAN_P__DMDK": "RAJAMANNAN_P__DMDK", "SRINIVASAN_A__BJP": "SRINIVASAN_A__BJP", "VELMURUGAN_P__IND": "VELMURUGAN_P__IND", "VINOBA_C__IND": "VINOBA_C__IND", "BARATHIDASAN_K__BSP": "BARATHIDASAN_K__BSP", "SUNDARAVINAYAGAM_N__IND": "SUNDARAVINAYAGAM_N__IND", "BALAKRISHNAN_R__IND": "BALAKRISHNAN_R__IND", "JAISANKAR_P__IND": "JAISANKAR_P__IND", "BALAKRISHNAN_K__IND": "BALAKRISHNAN_K__IND", "VASU_S__SP": "VASU_S__SP", "BALAKRISHNAN_K__IND_1": "BALAKRISHNAN_K__IND_1", "BARATHIMOHAN_K__AIFB": "BARATHIMOHAN_K__AIFB", "RAMACHANDRAN_G__IND": "RAMACHANDRAN_G__IND", "ABDUL_ALI_A__IND": "ABDUL_ALI_A__IND", "ARCHUNAN_T__IND": "ARCHUNAN_T__IND", "ABDULHALIM_A__IND": "ABDULHALIM_A__IND", "VIJAYAKANTH_A__DMDK": "VIJAYAKANTH_A__DMDK", "GOVINDASAMY_R__PMK": "GOVINDASAMY_R__PMK", "KASINATHAN_R__ADMK": "KASINATHAN_R__ADMK", "ARAVIND_V__BJP": "ARAVIND_V__BJP", "VIJAYAKANTH_C__IND": "VIJAYAKANTH_C__IND", "MANGAPILLAI_K__SP": "MANGAPILLAI_K__SP", "VIJAYAKANTH_K__IND": "VIJAYAKANTH_K__IND", "SENTHILMURUGAN_S__BSP": "SENTHILMURUGAN_S__BSP", "VIJAYAKANTH_A__IND": "VIJAYAKANTH_A__IND", "SAMY_N__IND": "SAMY_N__IND", "DURAI_RAMACHANDARAN__IND": "DURAI_RAMACHANDARAN__IND", "PRADEEPKUMAR_S__IND": "PRADEEPKUMAR_S__IND", "SRINIVASAN_S__IND": "SRINIVASAN_S__IND", "DEVI_JARENA_C__IND": "DEVI_JARENA_C__IND", "SELVAM_K__VCK": "SELVAM_K__VCK", "GANESAN_V__DMK": "GANESAN_V__DMK", "MAHADEVAN_D__DMDK": "MAHADEVAN_D__DMDK", "THIRUVALLUVAN_K__IND": "THIRUVALLUVAN_K__IND", "NARENTHERAN_R__BJP": "NARENTHERAN_R__BJP", "ELAVARASAN_T__IND": "ELAVARASAN_T__IND", "KOLANJINATHAN_V__IND": "KOLANJINATHAN_V__IND", "SUBRAMANIAN_V__IND": "SUBRAMANIAN_V__IND", "KANNAN_K__IND": "KANNAN_K__IND", "GANESAN_P__IND": "GANESAN_P__IND", "GANESAN_G__IND": "GANESAN_G__IND", "SIVARAJ_S__INC": "SIVARAJ_S__INC", "ATHINARAYANAN_L__ADMK": "ATHINARAYANAN_L__ADMK", "GOVINDAN_T_K__DMDK": "GOVINDAN_T_K__DMDK", "GOVINDARAJ_M__IND": "GOVINDARAJ_M__IND", "RAJA_SUNDARAM_B__BJP": "RAJA_SUNDARAM_B__BJP", "DHARMALINGAM_MARUR_N__LJP": "DHARMALINGAM_MARUR_N__LJP", "UDHAYASOORIYAN_T__DMK": "UDHAYASOORIYAN_T__DMK", "MOHAN_P__ADMK": "MOHAN_P__ADMK", "SUBBARAYALU_R__DMDK": "SUBBARAYALU_R__DMDK", "MANNAN_M_P__IND": "MANNAN_M_P__IND", "KALAIVENDHAN_M__BSP": "KALAIVENDHAN_M__BSP", "BALASUBRAMANIAN_PON__BJP": "BALASUBRAMANIAN_PON__BJP", "MANAMOHANADOSS_A__LJP": "MANAMOHANADOSS_A__LJP", "SEKAR_K__IND": "SEKAR_K__IND", "ARUN_KENNADY_A__IND": "ARUN_KENNADY_A__IND", "ANGAIYARKANNI_A_SELVI__DMK": "ANGAIYARKANNI_A_SELVI__DMK", "SANNIYASI_P__ADMK": "SANNIYASI_P__ADMK", "CHEZHIYAN_R__DMDK": "CHEZHIYAN_R__DMDK", "ANNAMMAL_C_TMT__IND": "ANNAMMAL_C_TMT__IND", "POOBATHI_C__BSP": "POOBATHI_C__BSP", "AIYADURAI_V__IND": "AIYADURAI_V__IND", "AYYAKKANNU_S__SP": "AYYAKKANNU_S__SP", "RAJKUMAR_J__BJP": "RAJKUMAR_J__BJP", "GOPINATH_K__INC": "GOPINATH_K__INC", "SAMPANGIRAMAIAH_V__ADMK": "SAMPANGIRAMAIAH_V__ADMK", "VENKATASAMY_B__BJP": "VENKATASAMY_B__BJP", "CHANDIRAN_V__DMDK": "CHANDIRAN_V__DMDK", "RAMASAMY_G_C__IND": "RAMASAMY_G_C__IND", "CHITRAMBALAM_M__BSP": "CHITRAMBALAM_M__BSP", "KRISHNA_REDDY_N__TNJC": "KRISHNA_REDDY_N__TNJC", "BASHA_A__IND": "BASHA_A__IND", "GOWRAPPA_K__IND": "GOWRAPPA_K__IND", "RAMACHANDRAN_T__IND": "RAMACHANDRAN_T__IND", "NAGARAJA_REDDY_P__CPI": "NAGARAJA_REDDY_P__CPI", "GOWDA_N_S_M__JD_S": "GOWDA_N_S_M__JD_S", "BUTTANNA_Y__IND": "BUTTANNA_Y__IND", "MURALIDHARAN_K_V__BJP": "MURALIDHARAN_K_V__BJP", "HARI_V__DMDK": "HARI_V__DMDK", "VINDAI_VENDAN_V__IND": "VINDAI_VENDAN_V__IND", "MUNIRAJ_R__BSP": "MUNIRAJ_R__BSP", "SAKULAN_M__IND": "SAKULAN_M__IND", "MEGANATHAN_T_A__PMK": "MEGANATHAN_T_A__PMK", "MUNUSAMY_K_P__ADMK": "MUNUSAMY_K_P__ADMK", "CHINNARAJ_K_R__DMDK": "CHINNARAJ_K_R__DMDK", "VENKATESAN_V__IND": "VENKATESAN_V__IND", "RAJAMANI_T__IND": "RAJAMANI_T__IND", "ARUL_MOZHI_M__BSP": "ARUL_MOZHI_M__BSP", "KUPPUSAMY_D__IND": "KUPPUSAMY_D__IND", "KAVIARASU_S__IND": "KAVIARASU_S__IND", "MADAPPAN_K__BJP": "MADAPPAN_K__BJP", "SENGUTTUVAN_T__DMK": "SENGUTTUVAN_T__DMK", "GOVINDARAJ_V__ADMK": "GOVINDARAJ_V__ADMK", "GOVINDARAJ_R__DMDK": "GOVINDARAJ_R__DMDK", "DAVIT_P__NCP": "DAVIT_P__NCP", "RAJU_V__IND": "RAJU_V__IND", "ABIMANNAN_C__BSP": "ABIMANNAN_C__BSP", "CHENNAIYAN_C__IND": "CHENNAIYAN_C__IND", "MUNAVARIBEGUM_S__BJP": "MUNAVARIBEGUM_S__BJP", "KRISHNAMOORTHY_RAO_V_M__IND": "KRISHNAMOORTHY_RAO_V_M__IND", "GURU_RAJAN_M_R__UCPI": "GURU_RAJAN_M_R__UCPI", "THAMBIDURAI_M__ADMK": "THAMBIDURAI_M__ADMK", "VETRISELVAN_V__DMK": "VETRISELVAN_V__DMK", "GOVINDARAJ_K_V__DMDK": "GOVINDARAJ_K_V__DMDK", "NARAYANASAMY_C__IND": "NARAYANASAMY_C__IND", "MANI_R__NCP": "MANI_R__NCP", "SARAVANAN_R__IND": "SARAVANAN_R__IND", "ELAVARASAN_A__BSP": "ELAVARASAN_A__BSP", "SUBRAMANIAN_B__BJP": "SUBRAMANIAN_B__BJP", "ASOKHAN_K__IND": "ASOKHAN_K__IND", "GUNASEKARAN_K__IND": "GUNASEKARAN_K__IND", "DILLIBABU_P__CPM": "DILLIBABU_P__CPM", "GOVINDASAMY_K__VCK": "GOVINDASAMY_K__VCK", "ARJUNAN_P__DMDK": "ARJUNAN_P__DMDK", "AMBETHKAR_P__BJP": "AMBETHKAR_P__BJP", "MURUGAN_V_P__IND": "MURUGAN_V_P__IND", "RAJI_R__BSP": "RAJI_R__BSP", "THIRUMAL_M__IND": "THIRUMAL_M__IND", "KALAIMANI_V__IND": "KALAIMANI_V__IND", "MULLAIVENDHAN_V__DMK": "MULLAIVENDHAN_V__DMK", "SINGARAM_K__ADMK": "SINGARAM_K__ADMK", "SARAVANAN_S__DMDK": "SARAVANAN_S__DMDK", "PATHMANAPAN_R__IND": "PATHMANAPAN_R__IND", "JAYAKUMAR_S__BJP": "JAYAKUMAR_S__BJP", "THIRUMOORTHI_S__BSP": "THIRUMOORTHI_S__BSP", "ANBALAGAN_K_P__ADMK": "ANBALAGAN_K_P__ADMK", "MANNAN_K__PMK": "MANNAN_K__PMK", "VIJAYASHANKAR_P__DMDK": "VIJAYASHANKAR_P__DMDK", "RAJAGOPAL_P__IND": "RAJAGOPAL_P__IND", "RAVISHANKAR_P__IND": "RAVISHANKAR_P__IND", "MARAN_M__IND": "MARAN_M__IND", "MATHIVANAN_S__IND": "MATHIVANAN_S__IND", "RAMESHKUMAR_D__BJP": "RAMESHKUMAR_D__BJP", "SIDDAN_P__IND": "SIDDAN_P__IND", "ANTHONY_L__IND": "ANTHONY_L__IND", "ANBALAGAN_M__IND": "ANBALAGAN_M__IND", "VELUSAMY_L__PMK": "VELUSAMY_L__PMK", "SAMPATH_V_S__MDMK": "SAMPATH_V_S__MDMK", "BHASKAR_A__DMDK": "BHASKAR_A__DMDK", "JAGANATHAN_M__IND": "JAGANATHAN_M__IND", "BABU_BABUJI_D__IND": "BABU_BABUJI_D__IND", "GNANAVELAVAN_K__IND": "GNANAVELAVAN_K__IND", "R_BOOPATHI__BJP": "R_BOOPATHI__BJP", "GOVINDARAJ_K__CPI_ML_L": "GOVINDARAJ_K__CPI_ML_L", "SELVAM_K__BSP": "SELVAM_K__BSP", "SAMPATH_H_M__IND": "SAMPATH_H_M__IND", "PANDIARAJAN_J__BDMK": "PANDIARAJAN_J__BDMK", "KANDASAMY_M_K__IND": "KANDASAMY_M_K__IND", "MAHENDIRAN_D__IND": "MAHENDIRAN_D__IND", "RAMAKRISHNAN_P__IND": "RAMAKRISHNAN_P__IND", "SAMPATH_C__IND": "SAMPATH_C__IND", "PERIANNAN_P_N__DMK": "PERIANNAN_P_N__DMK", "VETRIVEL_S_R__ADMK": "VETRIVEL_S_R__ADMK", "DHANDAPANI_P__DMDK": "DHANDAPANI_P__DMDK", "MUTHULAKSHME_V__IND": "MUTHULAKSHME_V__IND", "BALAMURUGAN_M__IND": "BALAMURUGAN_M__IND", "PERIYANNAN_E__IND": "PERIYANNAN_E__IND", "MURUGAN_K__IND": "MURUGAN_K__IND", "KANDASAMI_K_P__BJP": "KANDASAMI_K_P__BJP", "BALU_R__IND": "BALU_R__IND", "SEKER_M__BSP": "SEKER_M__BSP", "SUGUMAR_M__IND": "SUGUMAR_M__IND", "UDHYASANKAR_A__IND": "UDHYASANKAR_A__IND", "MANIKAM_E_R__SP": "MANIKAM_E_R__SP", "PALANI_T__IND": "PALANI_T__IND", "CHINNASAMY_P__IND": "CHINNASAMY_P__IND", "ANDI__IND": "ANDI__IND", "MANI_G_K__PMK": "MANI_G_K__PMK", "KANDASAMY_K__ADMK": "KANDASAMY_K__ADMK", "DHANDAPANY_S__DMDK": "DHANDAPANY_S__DMDK", "MANI_M_S__IND": "MANI_M_S__IND", "PADMARAJAN_K__IND": "PADMARAJAN_K__IND", "MUTHUKUMARAN_M__BJP": "MUTHUKUMARAN_M__BJP", "SARAVANAN_T__IND": "SARAVANAN_T__IND", "ANBALAGAN_K_R__AIFB": "ANBALAGAN_K_R__AIFB", "KANDASAMY_V__IND": "KANDASAMY_V__IND", "KANDASAMY_K__IND": "KANDASAMY_K__IND", "KANNAN_P__PMK": "KANNAN_P__PMK", "GOVINDAN_P__IND": "GOVINDAN_P__IND", "THAMARAI_KANNAN_K_S_V__MDMK": "THAMARAI_KANNAN_K_S_V__MDMK", "SURESH_C_J__DMDK": "SURESH_C_J__DMDK", "RAJENDRA_KUMAR_A__IND": "RAJENDRA_KUMAR_A__IND", "MUTHUSAMY_P__BJP": "MUTHUSAMY_P__BJP", "GOVINDAN_P__IND_1": "GOVINDAN_P__IND_1", "PALANIVEL_M__IND": "PALANIVEL_M__IND", "GOVINDAN_M__IND": "GOVINDAN_M__IND", "GURUSAMY_K__IND": "GURUSAMY_K__IND", "TAMIZHARASU_A__PMK": "TAMIZHARASU_A__PMK", "KRISHNAN_C__ADMK": "KRISHNAN_C__ADMK", "KAMALAKKANNAN_S__DMDK": "KAMALAKKANNAN_S__DMDK", "RAJA_KRISHNAN_K__IND": "RAJA_KRISHNAN_K__IND", "SELLAMUTHU_M__BSP": "SELLAMUTHU_M__BSP", "TAMILARASI_G__IND": "TAMILARASI_G__IND", "MURUGASENAPATHY_R__IND": "MURUGASENAPATHY_R__IND", "CHINNARASU_P__IND": "CHINNARASU_P__IND", "SOUNDARARAJAN_M__NCP": "SOUNDARARAJAN_M__NCP", "MANIVANNAN_K__IND": "MANIVANNAN_K__IND", "SUNDARARAJAN_S__JP": "SUNDARARAJAN_S__JP", "RAJA_PANDIAN_K__IND": "RAJA_PANDIAN_K__IND", "SHANMUGAM_C__IND": "SHANMUGAM_C__IND", "ARUL_ROZARIO_I__IND": "ARUL_ROZARIO_I__IND", "TAMILSELVAN_C__DMK": "TAMILSELVAN_C__DMK", "ALAMELU_J__ADMK": "ALAMELU_J__ADMK", "RAMAKRISHNAN_V__DMDK": "RAMAKRISHNAN_V__DMDK", "SHANMUGAM_K__IND": "SHANMUGAM_K__IND", "RAJASEKARAN_T__IND": "RAJASEKARAN_T__IND", "CHELLAMMAL_P__BJP": "CHELLAMMAL_P__BJP", "MURUGESAN_V__IND": "MURUGESAN_V__IND", "KUPPAYEE_E__IND": "KUPPAYEE_E__IND", "RAMAR_R__IND": "RAMAR_R__IND", "DURAISAMY_C__IND": "DURAISAMY_C__IND", "CHANDRAN_D__IND": "CHANDRAN_D__IND", "RAVICHANDRAN_L__ADMK": "RAVICHANDRAN_L__ADMK", "SURESH_M_R__INC": "SURESH_M_R__INC", "DHANASEKAR_S_J__DMDK": "DHANASEKAR_S_J__DMDK", "ANNADURAI_N__BJP": "ANNADURAI_N__BJP", "SHAJAHAN_M_A__IND": "SHAJAHAN_M_A__IND", "POONGODI_V__LJP": "POONGODI_V__LJP", "SANAULLAKHAN_B__BSP": "SANAULLAKHAN_B__BSP", "SRINIVASAN_G__IND": "SRINIVASAN_G__IND", "MANICKAM_S__IND": "MANICKAM_S__IND", "MANI_S__UCPI": "MANI_S__UCPI", "ARUMUGAM_S__DMK": "ARUMUGAM_S__DMK", "SURESHKUMAR_R__ADMK": "SURESHKUMAR_R__ADMK", "GNANASEKARAN_K_V__DMDK": "GNANASEKARAN_K_V__DMDK", "ANANDHAN_P_T__BJP": "ANANDHAN_P_T__BJP", "PONNUSAMY_V__BSP": "PONNUSAMY_V__BSP", "SREEDHAR_N__IND": "SREEDHAR_N__IND", "SAMBU_K__IND": "SAMBU_K__IND", "ABDUL_KHADHAR_M_S__IND": "ABDUL_KHADHAR_M_S__IND", "KANDASAMY_S__IND": "KANDASAMY_S__IND", "ARIVALAGAN_P__IND": "ARIVALAGAN_P__IND", "ARUMUGAM_N__IND": "ARUMUGAM_N__IND", "ARUMUGAM_S__IND_1": "ARUMUGAM_S__IND_1", "RAJENDRAN_A__DMK": "RAJENDRAN_A__DMK", "VIJAYALAKSHMI_PALANISAMY_P__ADMK": "VIJAYALAKSHMI_PALANISAMY_P__ADMK", "SALEM_GOVINDARAJ_S__DMDK": "SALEM_GOVINDARAJ_S__DMDK", "ANNADURAI_A__BJP": "ANNADURAI_A__BJP", "RAJENDRAN_R__IND": "RAJENDRAN_R__IND", "RADHAKRISHNAN_G__IND": "RADHAKRISHNAN_G__IND", "BENJAMIN_K__IND": "BENJAMIN_K__IND", "ARATHANARI_A__IND": "ARATHANARI_A__IND", "NATARAJAN_R__IND": "NATARAJAN_R__IND", "SAMIYAPPAN_A__IND": "SAMIYAPPAN_A__IND", "SELVAGEATHAN_M__IND": "SELVAGEATHAN_M__IND", "SASI_V__IND": "SASI_V__IND", "SUBRAMANIAM_K__IND": "SUBRAMANIAM_K__IND", "RAJENDRAN_R__DMK": "RAJENDRAN_R__DMK", "ELANGOVAN_R__ADMK": "ELANGOVAN_R__ADMK", "SURESH_BABU_K__DMDK": "SURESH_BABU_K__DMDK", "RAJENDRAN_M__IND": "RAJENDRAN_M__IND", "RAJENDRAN_P__IND": "RAJENDRAN_P__IND", "VENKATACHALAM_K_S__BJP": "VENKATACHALAM_K_S__BJP", "VINAYAKAMOORTHI_T__BSP": "VINAYAKAMOORTHI_T__BSP", "GOVINDAN_A__SP": "GOVINDAN_A__SP", "ARIVAZHAHAN_C__IND": "ARIVAZHAHAN_C__IND", "RAJENDRAN_A__IND": "RAJENDRAN_A__IND", "PADMANAPAN_M__IND": "PADMANAPAN_M__IND", "ELANGOVAN_P__IND": "ELANGOVAN_P__IND", "ELANGOVAN_P__IND_1": "ELANGOVAN_P__IND_1", "RAJENDRAN_A__IND_1": "RAJENDRAN_A__IND_1", "ELANGOVAN_G__IND": "ELANGOVAN_G__IND", "SUNDARAM_M_R__INC": "SUNDARAM_M_R__INC", "MURUGESAN_A_K__ADMK": "MURUGESAN_A_K__ADMK", "ELANGOVAN_A_R__DMDK": "ELANGOVAN_A_R__DMDK", "KUMARAVEL_A__BJP": "KUMARAVEL_A__BJP", "LAXMANAN_N__IND": "LAXMANAN_N__IND", "MARIYAPPAN_M_P__BSP": "MARIYAPPAN_M_P__BSP", "SUNDARAM_K__IND": "SUNDARAM_K__IND", "ANTO_DAVID_S__IND": "ANTO_DAVID_S__IND", "SIVASUBRAMANIAM_S__IND": "SIVASUBRAMANIAM_S__IND", "CHINNADURAI_K__DMK": "CHINNADURAI_K__DMK", "ELANGOVAN_P__ADMK": "ELANGOVAN_P__ADMK", "GEETHA_K__DMDK": "GEETHA_K__DMDK", "RAJKUMAR_P__IND": "RAJKUMAR_P__IND", "PARAMASIVAM_M__IND": "PARAMASIVAM_M__IND", "SARAVANAN_S__BJP": "SARAVANAN_S__BJP", "MUTHAIYAN_K__IND": "MUTHAIYAN_K__IND", "MANIVANNAN_P__BSP": "MANIVANNAN_P__BSP", "RAJAMANI_J__IND": "RAJAMANI_J__IND", "CHELLAMUTHU_K__SP": "CHELLAMUTHU_K__SP", "POONGOTHAI_J__IND": "POONGOTHAI_J__IND", "RAMASWAMY_K_P__DMK": "RAMASWAMY_K_P__DMK", "SUNDARAM_P_R__ADMK": "SUNDARAM_P_R__ADMK", "RAJAGOUNDER_R__DMDK": "RAJAGOUNDER_R__DMDK", "RAMASAMY_K__IND": "RAMASAMY_K__IND", "RAJAMANI_VELU__BJP": "RAJAMANI_VELU__BJP", "VENKATACHALAM_P__IND": "VENKATACHALAM_P__IND", "DURAISAMY_P__IND": "DURAISAMY_P__IND", "CHINNUSAMY_R__IND": "CHINNUSAMY_R__IND", "SHANMUGAM_L__IND": "SHANMUGAM_L__IND", "GANAPATHY_R__IND": "GANAPATHY_R__IND", "GOVINDHASAMY_R__IND": "GOVINDHASAMY_R__IND", "KANDHASAMY_S__IND": "KANDHASAMY_S__IND", "PONNUSAMY_K__DMK": "PONNUSAMY_K__DMK", "CHANDRAN_P__ADMK": "CHANDRAN_P__ADMK", "SANTHI_TMT_R__DMDK": "SANTHI_TMT_R__DMDK", "KUPPUSAMY_K__BJP": "KUPPUSAMY_K__BJP", "CHANDRASEKARAN_C__IND": "CHANDRASEKARAN_C__IND", "CHANDRASEKARAN_C__IND_1": "CHANDRASEKARAN_C__IND_1", "JAYAKUMAR_K__INC": "JAYAKUMAR_K__INC", "SARADHA_TMT_R__ADMK": "SARADHA_TMT_R__ADMK", "AMUDHA_TMT_P__DMDK": "AMUDHA_TMT_P__DMDK", "NATARAJAN_M__BJP": "NATARAJAN_M__BJP", "NATARAJAN_A__IND": "NATARAJAN_A__IND", "VIJAYAMBAL_TMT_A__BSP": "VIJAYAMBAL_TMT_A__BSP", "RAMADOSS_K_D__IND": "RAMADOSS_K_D__IND", "KARALAN_R__IND": "KARALAN_R__IND", "KANNAN_P__LJP": "KANNAN_P__LJP", "DHANAPAL_T__IND": "DHANAPAL_T__IND", "SUBRAMANIAM_A__IND": "SUBRAMANIAM_A__IND", "ANNADURAI_S__IND": "ANNADURAI_S__IND", "VIJAYA_K__AIFB": "VIJAYA_K__AIFB", "NEDUNCHEZHIAN_K__PMK": "NEDUNCHEZHIAN_K__PMK", "GURUSWAMY_T_N__MDMK": "GURUSWAMY_T_N__MDMK", "SELVI_K__DMDK": "SELVI_K__DMDK", "VIJAYAKUMAR_K__IND": "VIJAYAKUMAR_K__IND", "RANGASAMY_E__IND": "RANGASAMY_E__IND", "RAJU_L__BJP": "RAJU_L__BJP", "EGAMBARAM_S__IND": "EGAMBARAM_S__IND", "DHARMALINGAM_M_P__IND": "DHARMALINGAM_M_P__IND", "YOGANATHAN_N__IND": "YOGANATHAN_N__IND", "SELVARASU_K__IND": "SELVARASU_K__IND", "PALANIVEL_A__IND": "PALANIVEL_A__IND", "MATHAIYAN_S__IND": "MATHAIYAN_S__IND", "SINGARAVELU_S__IND": "SINGARAVELU_S__IND", "THANNGAMANI_P__ADMK": "THANNGAMANI_P__ADMK", "GANDHISELVAN_S__DMK": "GANDHISELVAN_S__DMK", "PONGIYANNAN_S__DMDK": "PONGIYANNAN_S__DMDK", "LINGAPPAN_V__IND": "LINGAPPAN_V__IND", "DHANAGOPAL_P_T__BJP": "DHANAGOPAL_P_T__BJP", "THENMOZHI__CPI_ML_L": "THENMOZHI__CPI_ML_L", "MANOHARAN_P__IND": "MANOHARAN_P__IND", "ANNADURAI_K__IND": "ANNADURAI_K__IND", "SIVAMALAI_V__IND": "SIVAMALAI_V__IND", "NANDHAKUMAR_K_L__IND": "NANDHAKUMAR_K_L__IND", "DHANDAPANI_T_G_P__IND": "DHANDAPANI_T_G_P__IND", "SELVARAJ_P__IND": "SELVARAJ_P__IND", "CHINNUSAMY_N__IND": "CHINNUSAMY_N__IND", "DURAISAMY_V_P__DMK": "DURAISAMY_V_P__DMK", "SHANTHAMANI_S__ADMK": "SHANTHAMANI_S__ADMK", "EASWARAN_R__DMDK": "EASWARAN_R__DMDK", "SAKTHIVEL_P__IND": "SAKTHIVEL_P__IND", "PONNUSAMI_P__BSP": "PONNUSAMI_P__BSP", "KANDHASAMY_P__IND": "KANDHASAMY_P__IND", "MURUGAN_L__BJP": "MURUGAN_L__BJP", "RAMASAMY_A__IND": "RAMASAMY_A__IND", "MANICKAM_T_K__JD_U": "MANICKAM_T_K__JD_U", "RAMESH_A_K__IND": "RAMESH_A_K__IND", "ASHOKKUMAR_K_R__IND": "ASHOKKUMAR_K_R__IND", "KAVERI_V__PMK": "KAVERI_V__PMK", "PALANISWAMI_K__ADMK": "PALANISWAMI_K__ADMK", "RAJENDRAN_AK__DMDK": "RAJENDRAN_AK__DMDK", "GANESAN_I__IND": "GANESAN_I__IND", "RAVI_R__IND": "RAVI_R__IND", "THILLAIKKARASI_PONNUSAMY_S__BJP": "THILLAIKKARASI_PONNUSAMY_S__BJP", "MURUGESAN_N__JD_U": "MURUGESAN_N__JD_U", "SELVARAJU_V__IND": "SELVARAJU_V__IND", "PALANISAMY_P__IND": "PALANISAMY_P__IND", "RATHINAVEL_K__IND": "RATHINAVEL_K__IND", "SAKTHIVEL_S__IND": "SAKTHIVEL_S__IND", "PALANI_S__IND": "PALANI_S__IND", "DEVARAJAN_A__IND": "DEVARAJAN_A__IND", "CHINNARAJ_O_K__ADMK": "CHINNARAJ_O_K__ADMK", "ARUNKUMAR_B__DMK": "ARUNKUMAR_B__DMK", "SARASWATHI_V__DMDK": "SARASWATHI_V__DMDK", "JEGANATHAN_P__BJP": "JEGANATHAN_P__BJP", "PREMNATH_R__IND": "PREMNATH_R__IND", "PAPPANNAN_T_K__IND": "PAPPANNAN_T_K__IND", "VEERAKUMAR_N__JD_U": "VEERAKUMAR_N__JD_U", "CHINNARAJ_P_S__IND": "CHINNARAJ_P_S__IND", "PREMA_R__ADMK": "PREMA_R__ADMK", "ARUMUGAM_M__CPI": "ARUMUGAM_M__CPI", "ANANDHARAJ_M__DMDK": "ANANDHARAJ_M__DMDK", "MOHANRAJ_M__IND": "MOHANRAJ_M__IND", "RAMASAMY_P__BSP": "RAMASAMY_P__BSP", "NAINAN_K__IND": "NAINAN_K__IND", "RAVIRAJ_M_R__SP": "RAVIRAJ_M_R__SP", "CHELLADURAI_P__IND": "CHELLADURAI_P__IND", "GANESAN_A__IND": "GANESAN_A__IND", "KANNAPPAN_M__MDMK": "KANNAPPAN_M__MDMK", "BALASUBRAMONIYAN_S_R__INC": "BALASUBRAMONIYAN_S_R__INC", "DENNIS_KOVIL_PILLAI_E__DMDK": "DENNIS_KOVIL_PILLAI_E__DMDK", "CHINNARAJ_M__BJP": "CHINNARAJ_M__BJP", "VARADHARAJAN_K__IND": "VARADHARAJAN_K__IND", "JANAKI_D__BSP": "JANAKI_D__BSP", "SHANMUGASUNDARAM_S__IND": "SHANMUGASUNDARAM_S__IND", "RANGASWAMY_V_C__IND": "RANGASWAMY_V_C__IND", "MANIKANDAN_V__IND": "MANIKANDAN_V__IND", "KRISHNAN_V__AIFB": "KRISHNAN_V__AIFB", "BALU_C_ALIAS_C_BALAKRISHNAN_C_P_C__BDMK": "BALU_C_ALIAS_C_BALAKRISHNAN_C_P_C__BDMK", "NAGARAJAN_A__IND": "NAGARAJAN_A__IND", "SARAVANAKUMAR_R__IND": "SARAVANAKUMAR_R__IND", "JANAKI_V__LJP": "JANAKI_V__LJP", "SENTHILKUMAR_K__IND": "SENTHILKUMAR_K__IND", "AYYASAMY_T_A__IND": "AYYASAMY_T_A__IND", "CHINNASWAMY_R__ADMK": "CHINNASWAMY_R__ADMK", "SOUNDARARAJAN_A__CPM": "SOUNDARARAJAN_A__CPM", "PONNUSAMY_M__DMDK": "PONNUSAMY_M__DMDK", "VELUSAMY_V__BJP": "VELUSAMY_V__BJP", "NAKKEERAN_N__BSP": "NAKKEERAN_N__BSP", "MALARAVAN_T__ADMK": "MALARAVAN_T__ADMK", "MAHESWARI_A_S__INC": "MAHESWARI_A_S__INC", "AKBAR_A_S__DMDK": "AKBAR_A_S__DMDK", "KARUMUTHUTHIAGARAJAN_M__BJP": "KARUMUTHUTHIAGARAJAN_M__BJP", "MARUTHACHALAM_K__IND": "MARUTHACHALAM_K__IND", "MOOKAMBIKAIMANI_S__IND": "MOOKAMBIKAIMANI_S__IND", "KRISHNAN_R__BSP": "KRISHNAN_R__BSP", "VIJAY_M_R__IND": "VIJAY_M_R__IND", "YUVARAJ_S__IND": "YUVARAJ_S__IND", "SENTHIL_KUMAR_D__IND": "SENTHIL_KUMAR_D__IND", "KRISHNARAJ_G__BDMK": "KRISHNARAJ_G__BDMK", "ANATHAN_S__IND": "ANATHAN_S__IND", "ASHOK_CHAND_K__IND": "ASHOK_CHAND_K__IND", "RANGAN_N__IND": "RANGAN_N__IND", "PONGALUR_PALANISAMY_N__DMK": "PONGALUR_PALANISAMY_N__DMK", "GOPALAKRISHNAN_V__ADMK": "GOPALAKRISHNAN_V__ADMK", "MARY_G__DMDK": "MARY_G__DMDK", "SHANMUGAM_K__BJP": "SHANMUGAM_K__BJP", "RAMAMOORTHY_P_M__IND": "RAMAMOORTHY_P_M__IND", "ANBUSELVAM_S_B__JD_U": "ANBUSELVAM_S_B__JD_U", "SUBRAMANIAN_P__BSP": "SUBRAMANIAN_P__BSP", "SIVARAJASEKARAN_P__IND": "SIVARAJASEKARAN_P__IND", "VELUMANI_S_P__ADMK": "VELUMANI_S_P__ADMK", "RUKUMANI_N__DMK": "RUKUMANI_N__DMK", "RAJASEKAR_S__DMDK": "RAJASEKAR_S__DMDK", "RAMAMURTHY_K_P__BJP": "RAMAMURTHY_K_P__BJP", "SAMINATHAN_P__LJP": "SAMINATHAN_P__LJP", "VARADHARAJAN_V_V__IND": "VARADHARAJAN_V_V__IND", "JAYARAJ_M__IND": "JAYARAJ_M__IND", "VELUMANI_K__IND": "VELUMANI_K__IND", "SIVAKUMAR_K__BSP": "SIVAKUMAR_K__BSP", "RUKMANI_V__IND": "RUKMANI_V__IND", "NOORMOHAMMAD_A__AIFB": "NOORMOHAMMAD_A__AIFB", "RUKMANI_B__IND": "RUKMANI_B__IND", "SENTHILKUMAR_M__IND": "SENTHILKUMAR_M__IND", "VELUMANI_N__IND": "VELUMANI_N__IND", "RAVICHANDRAN_S__IND": "RAVICHANDRAN_S__IND", "THANGAVELU_G__IND": "THANGAVELU_G__IND", "DAMODARAN_S__ADMK": "DAMODARAN_S__ADMK", "KANDASAMY_K_V__DMK": "KANDASAMY_K_V__DMK", "LATHARANI_C_B__DMDK": "LATHARANI_C_B__DMDK", "MUTHURAMALINGAM_V__BJP": "MUTHURAMALINGAM_V__BJP", "RANGARASU_R__IND": "RANGARASU_R__IND", "AARAN_M__IND": "AARAN_M__IND", "AMIRTHALINGAM_V__IND": "AMIRTHALINGAM_V__IND", "LAKSHMI_V_P__BSP": "LAKSHMI_V_P__BSP", "POLLACHI_JAYARAMAN_V__ADMK": "POLLACHI_JAYARAMAN_V__ADMK", "SHANTHI_DEVI_D__DMK": "SHANTHI_DEVI_D__DMK", "MEENAKSHI_SUNDARAM_S__DMDK": "MEENAKSHI_SUNDARAM_S__DMDK", "RAGUNATHAN_V_K__BJP": "RAGUNATHAN_V_K__BJP", "JAYARAMAN_V_M__IND": "JAYARAMAN_V_M__IND", "GOKULRAJ_G_S__IND": "GOKULRAJ_G_S__IND", "MANIKANDAN_B__IND": "MANIKANDAN_B__IND", "JOSE_THOMAS_T__BSP": "JOSE_THOMAS_T__BSP", "SHANTHI_G__IND": "SHANTHI_G__IND", "NATARAJ_K__IND": "NATARAJ_K__IND", "ARUMUGAM_P_K__IND": "ARUMUGAM_P_K__IND", "KOVAITHANGAM_N__INC": "KOVAITHANGAM_N__INC", "KALAIYARASAN_SUSI_S__VCK": "KALAIYARASAN_SUSI_S__VCK", "MURUGARAJ_S__DMDK": "MURUGARAJ_S__DMDK", "THANGAVEL_M__BJP": "THANGAVEL_M__BJP", "SHREEDARAN_DR_A__IND": "SHREEDARAN_DR_A__IND", "DEVAKI_S__BSP": "DEVAKI_S__BSP", "THILAGAVATHI_S__JD_U": "THILAGAVATHI_S__JD_U", "BALASUBRAMANIAN_V__IND": "BALASUBRAMANIAN_V__IND", "KANAGARAJ_K__IND": "KANAGARAJ_K__IND", "SHANMUGAVELU_C__ADMK": "SHANMUGAVELU_C__ADMK", "VELUCHAMY_C__DMK": "VELUCHAMY_C__DMK", "GNANASAMBANDHAM_G_R__DMDK": "GNANASAMBANDHAM_G_R__DMDK", "KATHHIRVEL_K__IND": "KATHHIRVEL_K__IND", "KARTHIKEYAN_M_K__BJP": "KARTHIKEYAN_M_K__BJP", "VANJIMUTHU_N__IND": "VANJIMUTHU_N__IND", "RAMAGANAPATHY_K__BSP": "RAMAGANAPATHY_K__BSP", "KARUPPUSAMY_K__IND": "KARUPPUSAMY_K__IND", "AYYAPPAN_K__IND": "AYYAPPAN_K__IND", "ARIVUDAINAMBI_V__IND": "ARIVUDAINAMBI_V__IND", "GURUSAMY_M__IND": "GURUSAMY_M__IND", "PRABAVATHI_P__DMK": "PRABAVATHI_P__DMK", "RANGANAYAHI_M__ADMK": "RANGANAYAHI_M__ADMK", "JYOTHIPAANDIYAN_K_N_K__DMDK": "JYOTHIPAANDIYAN_K_N_K__DMDK", "SANTHI_E__BJP": "SANTHI_E__BJP", "PONNUSAMY_P__IND": "PONNUSAMY_P__IND", "JEYA_C__BSP": "JEYA_C__BSP", "NACHIMUTHU_D__IND": "NACHIMUTHU_D__IND", "KULANDAIVELU_M__IND": "KULANDAIVELU_M__IND", "SAMINATHAN_M_P__DMK": "SAMINATHAN_M_P__DMK", "GANESHAMURTHI_A__MDMK": "GANESHAMURTHI_A__MDMK", "JAGANATHAN_P__DMDK": "JAGANATHAN_P__DMDK", "VENGATESH_S__IND": "VENGATESH_S__IND", "SURIYAMOORTHI_S__BJP": "SURIYAMOORTHI_S__BJP", "SELVARAJ_PON__IND": "SELVARAJ_PON__IND", "CHELLAMUTHU_P__IND": "CHELLAMUTHU_P__IND", "ANNAMALAI_V__IND": "ANNAMALAI_V__IND", "SELVI_L__JD_U": "SELVI_L__JD_U", "SUGUMARAN_N__IND": "SUGUMARAN_N__IND", "GANAPATHI_R__SP": "GANAPATHI_R__SP", "MUNIYAMMAL_M__BSP": "MUNIYAMMAL_M__BSP", "ANBALAGAN_C__IND": "ANBALAGAN_C__IND", "MANI_S__DMK": "MANI_S__DMK", "DAMODARAN_P_V__ADMK": "DAMODARAN_P_V__ADMK", "RAMESH_C__DMDK": "RAMESH_C__DMDK", "UTHRAKUMAR_P__BJP": "UTHRAKUMAR_P__BJP", "GOVINDASAMY_S__IND": "GOVINDASAMY_S__IND", "SATHISHKUMAR_L__SP": "SATHISHKUMAR_L__SP", "UMAR_ALI_D__IND": "UMAR_ALI_D__IND", "KARTHIKEYAN_PON__IND": "KARTHIKEYAN_PON__IND", "VELUSAMY_S_M__ADMK": "VELUSAMY_S_M__ADMK", "PONMUDI_S_S__DMK": "PONMUDI_S_S__DMK", "SUBRAMANIAM_G__DMDK": "SUBRAMANIAM_G__DMDK", "THIRUMURTHY_P_M__BJP": "THIRUMURTHY_P_M__BJP", "MYLSWAMY_S_P__BSP": "MYLSWAMY_S_P__BSP", "RAJENDRAN_A_S__IND": "RAJENDRAN_A_S__IND", "MURUGESAN_K_P__IND": "MURUGESAN_K_P__IND", "SUBRAMANIAN_M__IND": "SUBRAMANIAN_M__IND", "GOVINDASAMY_C__CPM": "GOVINDASAMY_C__CPM", "DURAISAMY_S__MDMK": "DURAISAMY_S__MDMK", "PALANISAMY_K__DMDK": "PALANISAMY_K__DMDK", "KARTHIKKEYEAN_A_M__BJP": "KARTHIKKEYEAN_A_M__BJP", "SHANGER_M__IND": "SHANGER_M__IND", "SUKUMARAN_K__SP": "SUKUMARAN_K__SP", "VENKATESAN_B__IND": "VENKATESAN_B__IND", "LINGASAMY_A__IND": "LINGASAMY_A__IND", "MOORTHI_K__IND": "MOORTHI_K__IND", "SUNDARAPANDIYAN_S__AIFB_S": "SUNDARAPANDIYAN_S__AIFB_S", "ALAGAPPAN_PERIASAMY__IND": "ALAGAPPAN_PERIASAMY__IND", "BALAJI_K__IND": "BALAJI_K__IND", "SHANMUGAM_V_G__IND": "SHANMUGAM_V_G__IND", "SEKAR_S__INC": "SEKAR_S__INC", "PALANISWAMI_N_M_S__ADMK": "PALANISWAMI_N_M_S__ADMK", "KUMARASAMY_P__DMDK": "KUMARASAMY_P__DMDK", "SUBRAMANIYAM_K__JD_U": "SUBRAMANIYAM_K__JD_U", "PERUMAL_K__BSP": "PERUMAL_K__BSP", "PALANISAMY_K__IND": "PALANISAMY_K__IND", "SEKAR_M__IND": "SEKAR_M__IND", "KAMATCHIDEVI_S__IND": "KAMATCHIDEVI_S__IND", "PALANISAMI_R_M__INC": "PALANISAMI_R_M__INC", "NAMACHIVAYAM_V_P__ADMK": "NAMACHIVAYAM_V_P__ADMK", "VICTORIA_B__DMDK": "VICTORIA_B__DMDK", "NALLASAMY_P__BJP": "NALLASAMY_P__BJP", "THANGAVEL_K_S__IND": "THANGAVEL_K_S__IND", "SELLADURAI_K__IND": "SELLADURAI_K__IND", "GOVINDASAMY_S__BSP": "GOVINDASAMY_S__BSP", "POOVAI_G__IND": "POOVAI_G__IND", "NATARASAN_K_M__NCP": "NATARASAN_K_M__NCP", "MARIMUTHU_N__IND": "MARIMUTHU_N__IND", "KATHIRVEL_S_K__IND": "KATHIRVEL_S_K__IND", "MAYILSAMY_K__IND": "MAYILSAMY_K__IND", "GUNASEKARAN_T_K__IND": "GUNASEKARAN_T_K__IND", "SEGANATHAN_M__IND": "SEGANATHAN_M__IND", "SADAIAPPAN_C__IND": "SADAIAPPAN_C__IND", "PONNUDURAI_C__ADMK": "PONNUDURAI_C__ADMK", "PERIYASAMY_N__CPI": "PERIYASAMY_N__CPI", "RAVICHANDRAN_M__DMDK": "RAVICHANDRAN_M__DMDK", "SHRIGANDHEESWARAN_T__BJP": "SHRIGANDHEESWARAN_T__BJP", "PALANISAM_R__IND": "PALANISAM_R__IND", "DEVADASAN_B__JD_U": "DEVADASAN_B__JD_U", "KRISHNAMOORTHY_K__IND": "KRISHNAMOORTHY_K__IND", "SUBRAMANIAM_M_M_S__BSP": "SUBRAMANIAM_M_M_S__BSP", "SAMINATHAN_R__IND": "SAMINATHAN_R__IND", "SUBRAMANIAM_V_P__IND": "SUBRAMANIAM_V_P__IND", "PALANISAMY_M_S__NCP": "PALANISAMY_M_S__NCP", "DHANDAPANI_A__SP": "DHANDAPANI_A__SP", "RAAJA_NKK_P__DMK": "RAAJA_NKK_P__DMK", "SIVAKUMAR_E_R__ADMK": "SIVAKUMAR_E_R__ADMK", "CHANDHIRAKUMAR_V_C__DMDK": "CHANDHIRAKUMAR_V_C__DMDK", "CHAIRMAN_PON__BJP": "CHAIRMAN_PON__BJP", "MUTHUKUMAR_R__IND": "MUTHUKUMAR_R__IND", "SELLADURAI_K__BSP": "SELLADURAI_K__BSP", "SEKARAN_R__IND": "SEKARAN_R__IND", "SUKUMARAN_PON__IND": "SUKUMARAN_PON__IND", "BALAN_R__AIFB": "BALAN_R__AIFB", "TAMILRASU_M__IND": "TAMILRASU_M__IND", "SEERANGAN_A__IND": "SEERANGAN_A__IND", "CHRISTURAJ_M__IND": "CHRISTURAJ_M__IND", "KARNAN__IND": "KARNAN__IND", "SADHASIVAM_D__IND": "SADHASIVAM_D__IND", "KARTHIKEYAN_M__IND": "KARTHIKEYAN_M__IND", "K_V_RAMANATHAN__PMK": "K_V_RAMANATHAN__PMK", "KARUPPANAN_K_C__ADMK": "KARUPPANAN_K_C__ADMK", "GOPAL_P__DMDK": "GOPAL_P__DMDK", "PALANISAMY_K_A_P__BJP": "PALANISAMY_K_A_P__BJP", "ARULJOTHI_P_K__IND": "ARULJOTHI_P_K__IND", "PERUMAL_V_M__IND": "PERUMAL_V_M__IND", "RANGASAMY_P__IND": "RANGASAMY_P__IND", "KANDASAMY_S_K__BSP": "KANDASAMY_S_K__BSP", "RAJU_E__IND": "RAJU_E__IND", "PERUMAL_C__IND": "PERUMAL_C__IND", "THIYAGARAJAN_M__IND": "THIYAGARAJAN_M__IND", "SELVAM_C__IND": "SELVAM_C__IND", "KANNAIYAN_K_M__IND": "KANNAIYAN_K_M__IND", "GURUSAMY_S__DMK": "GURUSAMY_S__DMK", "SUBRAMANIAM_M__ADMK": "SUBRAMANIAM_M__ADMK", "JAGADEESWARAN_P__DMDK": "JAGADEESWARAN_P__DMDK", "RAJU_P__IND": "RAJU_P__IND", "PALANISAMY_V__BJP": "PALANISAMY_V__BJP", "MANNATHAN_P__IND": "MANNATHAN_P__IND", "GURUSAMY_P__IND": "GURUSAMY_P__IND", "GURUVAN_G__IND": "GURUVAN_G__IND", "SENGOTTAIYAN_K_A__ADMK": "SENGOTTAIYAN_K_A__ADMK", "V_MANIMARAN_G_V__DMK": "V_MANIMARAN_G_V__DMK", "NATARAJAN_G_S__DMDK": "NATARAJAN_G_S__DMDK", "RANGASAMY_R__IND": "RANGASAMY_R__IND", "VELLIANGIRI_R__BJP": "VELLIANGIRI_R__BJP", "PERIYASAMY_T__BSP": "PERIYASAMY_T__BSP", "MINIYAN__IND": "MINIYAN__IND", "SUBRAMANIAM_O__DMK": "SUBRAMANIAM_O__DMK", "SINDU_RAVICHANDARAN__ADMK": "SINDU_RAVICHANDARAN__ADMK", "SUBRAMANIAN_K__DMDK": "SUBRAMANIAN_K__DMDK", "ARUMUGAN__IND": "ARUMUGAN__IND", "VENKATRAJ__IND": "VENKATRAJ__IND", "THAMARAIMANALAN_P__BJP": "THAMARAIMANALAN_P__BJP", "VEERAN__IND": "VEERAN__IND", "RANGASAMY_V_T__BSP": "RANGASAMY_V_T__BSP", "PARAMESWARAMURTHY_M__IND": "PARAMESWARAMURTHY_M__IND", "DHARMALINGAM_L_P__DMK": "DHARMALINGAM_L_P__DMK", "SUBRAMANIAM_T_K__MDMK": "SUBRAMANIAM_T_K__MDMK", "MANOHARAN_D__DMDK": "MANOHARAN_D__DMDK", "SIVAKUMAR_S_N_R__BJP": "SIVAKUMAR_S_N_R__BJP", "RAMALINGAN_N_S__IND": "RAMALINGAN_N_S__IND", "PALANISAMY_R__SP": "PALANISAMY_R__SP", "SELVAN_K__IND": "SELVAN_K__IND", "GOPAL_B__IND": "GOPAL_B__IND", "SOUNDARAPANDIAN_A__DMK": "SOUNDARAPANDIAN_A__DMK", "SELVARAJ_M__ADMK": "SELVARAJ_M__ADMK", "CHIDAMBARAM_V__DMDK": "CHIDAMBARAM_V__DMDK", "ANBARASAN_ALIAS_ANBU_D__BJP": "ANBARASAN_ALIAS_ANBU_D__BJP", "RAMACHANDRAN_P__IND": "RAMACHANDRAN_P__IND", "THEINMATHI_P__BSP": "THEINMATHI_P__BSP", "ANNAKILI_A__IND": "ANNAKILI_A__IND", "ARUMUGAM_P__AIFB": "ARUMUGAM_P__AIFB", "GOPALAN_B__INC": "GOPALAN_B__INC", "DORAI_K_N__ADMK": "DORAI_K_N__ADMK", "BENJAMIN_JACOB_J__DMDK": "BENJAMIN_JACOB_J__DMDK", "MURUGESAN_R__BJP": "MURUGESAN_R__BJP", "ANAND_KUMAR_J__AIFB": "ANAND_KUMAR_J__AIFB", "SASI_KUMAR_A__IND": "SASI_KUMAR_A__IND", "KRISHNAN_R__IND": "KRISHNAN_R__IND", "PUKALENTHI_K__BSP": "PUKALENTHI_K__BSP", "SUBRAMANIAN_K__LJP": "SUBRAMANIAN_K__LJP", "RAMACHANDHIRAN_K__DMK": "RAMACHANDHIRAN_K__DMK", "MILLAR_A__ADMK": "MILLAR_A__ADMK", "KRISHNAMURTHY_L__DMDK": "KRISHNAMURTHY_L__DMDK", "KUMARAN_B__BJP": "KUMARAN_B__BJP", "JOHNSON_V_S__IND": "JOHNSON_V_S__IND", "RAJAMMAL_M__IND": "RAJAMMAL_M__IND", "DEVADASS_I__IND": "DEVADASS_I__IND", "DURAISWAMY_V__IND": "DURAISWAMY_V__IND", "ANBALAKAN_M__DMK": "ANBALAKAN_M__DMK", "PREMA_S__ADMK": "PREMA_S__ADMK", "SUNDARAM_P_K__DMDK": "SUNDARAM_P_K__DMDK", "CHINNAPPAN_RAJENDRAN__BJP": "CHINNAPPAN_RAJENDRAN__BJP", "PERIASAMY_S__IND": "PERIASAMY_S__IND", "VIJAYAKUMAR_S__BSP": "VIJAYAKUMAR_S__BSP", "SAMYKANNU_P__IND": "SAMYKANNU_P__IND", "THUNDAIYAN_K__IND": "THUNDAIYAN_K__IND", "KUMAR_K__IND": "KUMAR_K__IND", "KUPPUSAMY_M__IND": "KUPPUSAMY_M__IND", "SAKKARAPANI_R__DMK": "SAKKARAPANI_R__DMK", "NALLASAMY_K_P__ADMK": "NALLASAMY_K_P__ADMK", "BALASUBRAMANI_S__DMDK": "BALASUBRAMANI_S__DMDK", "KARUPPUSAMY_P__BJP": "KARUPPUSAMY_P__BJP", "MURUGAN_S__IND": "MURUGAN_S__IND", "INBARAJA_M__AIFB": "INBARAJA_M__AIFB", "CHELLAMUTHU_K__IND": "CHELLAMUTHU_K__IND", "SIVASUBRAMANI_S__IND": "SIVASUBRAMANI_S__IND", "SURESH_M__IND": "SURESH_M__IND", "SRINIVASAN_P__IND": "SRINIVASAN_P__IND", "SADAYAPPAN_K__IND": "SADAYAPPAN_K__IND", "SHANMUGAVEL_P__IND": "SHANMUGAVEL_P__IND", "PANNEER_SELVAM_O__ADMK": "PANNEER_SELVAM_O__ADMK", "MOOKAIAH_L__DMK": "MOOKAIAH_L__DMK", "ABDUL_KATHER_M__DMDK": "ABDUL_KATHER_M__DMDK", "RAJAPANDIYAN_P__BJP": "RAJAPANDIYAN_P__BJP", "SENTHIL_KUMAR_G__BSP": "SENTHIL_KUMAR_G__BSP", "RAJA_K_S__IND": "RAJA_K_S__IND", "RAJAGOPAL_C__IND": "RAJAGOPAL_C__IND", "JAWAHAR_N__IND": "JAWAHAR_N__IND", "ANANDA_MURUGAN_T__AIFB": "ANANDA_MURUGAN_T__AIFB", "POMMURASU_M__IND": "POMMURASU_M__IND", "PANNEER_SELVAM_P__IND": "PANNEER_SELVAM_P__IND", "PERIYA_SUBBAIYAN_P__IND": "PERIYA_SUBBAIYAN_P__IND", "SELVAMANI_RAJENDRAN__IND": "SELVAMANI_RAJENDRAN__IND", "PARAMASIVAM_T__IND": "PARAMASIVAM_T__IND", "ABDUL_RAHIM_S__IND": "ABDUL_RAHIM_S__IND", "SIVAKUMAR_A__IND": "SIVAKUMAR_A__IND", "GANESAN_RD__ADMK": "GANESAN_RD__ADMK", "DR_RAJKUMAR_N_R_T__INC": "DR_RAJKUMAR_N_R_T__INC", "MURUGESAN_P__DMDK": "MURUGESAN_P__DMDK", "LOGANDURAI_P__BJP": "LOGANDURAI_P__BJP", "CHINNAPANDI_M__BSP": "CHINNAPANDI_M__BSP", "VEERANAN_A__IND": "VEERANAN_A__IND", "SUBRAMANI_P__IND": "SUBRAMANI_P__IND", "PALPANDIAN_N__SP": "PALPANDIAN_N__SP", "VOLTAIRE_M_J__IND": "VOLTAIRE_M_J__IND", "KANNIARAJ_K__IND": "KANNIARAJ_K__IND", "PALPANDIAN_M__IND": "PALPANDIAN_M__IND", "PANDIAN_M__IND": "PANDIAN_M__IND", "LAKSHMANAN_S__DMK": "LAKSHMANAN_S__DMK", "PARTHIPAN_R__ADMK": "PARTHIPAN_R__ADMK", "MUTHUVELRAJ_P__IND": "MUTHUVELRAJ_P__IND", "ATCHAYAKANNAN_A__DMDK": "ATCHAYAKANNAN_A__DMDK", "SUBRAMANI_E__BJP": "SUBRAMANI_E__BJP", "THANGAPANDI_R__BSP": "THANGAPANDI_R__BSP", "BAGAVANDASS_S__IND": "BAGAVANDASS_S__IND", "RAMAKRISHNAN_C__IND": "RAMAKRISHNAN_C__IND", "ESWARAN_M__AIFB": "ESWARAN_M__AIFB", "NAGAMANISENTHIL_R__IND": "NAGAMANISENTHIL_R__IND", "PARTHIPAN_S__IND": "PARTHIPAN_S__IND", "ERAMAKRISHNAN_N__MDMK": "ERAMAKRISHNAN_N__MDMK", "SELVENDRAN_P__DMK": "SELVENDRAN_P__DMK", "JEGANATH_A__DMDK": "JEGANATH_A__DMDK", "SAKTHIVEL_A__BJP": "SAKTHIVEL_A__BJP", "VILANGUMANI_N__IND": "VILANGUMANI_N__IND", "SENTHIL_KUMAR_R__AIFB": "SENTHIL_KUMAR_R__AIFB", "PALANISAMY_S__IND": "PALANISAMY_S__IND", "EASWARAN_S__BSP": "EASWARAN_S__BSP", "AMBIKA_R__IND": "AMBIKA_R__IND", "SELVARAJ_T__IND": "SELVARAJ_T__IND", "KESAVAN_V__IND": "KESAVAN_V__IND", "KHAN_SHAHIB_N_K_P_P_S__IND": "KHAN_SHAHIB_N_K_P_P_S__IND", "RAJAKUMARI_A__IND": "RAJAKUMARI_A__IND", "JAYALALITHAA_J__ADMK": "JAYALALITHAA_J__ADMK", "SEEMAN__DMK": "SEEMAN__DMK", "CHANDRAN_V_S__DMDK": "CHANDRAN_V_S__DMDK", "SANTHAKUMAR_M__BJP": "SANTHAKUMAR_M__BJP", "BALASUNDARARAJ_P__BSP": "BALASUNDARARAJ_P__BSP", "MURUGAVELRAJAN_K__JD_U": "MURUGAVELRAJAN_K__JD_U", "RAJAMANI_S__IND": "RAJAMANI_S__IND", "JEYARAMAN_R__IND": "JEYARAMAN_R__IND", "RAJA_P__IND": "RAJA_P__IND", "PERIYASAMY_G__IND": "PERIYASAMY_G__IND", "BASKARAN_K_S__IND": "BASKARAN_K_S__IND", "PITCHAIMANI_M__IND": "PITCHAIMANI_M__IND", "SUBBURAJ_R__IND": "SUBBURAJ_R__IND", "PARAMESWARAN_A__IND": "PARAMESWARAN_A__IND", "DURAIRAJ_C__ADMK": "DURAIRAJ_C__ADMK", "THALAPATHI_G__DMK": "THALAPATHI_G__DMK", "SAMUNDEESWARI_A__DMDK": "SAMUNDEESWARI_A__DMDK", "SANTHAKUMAR_K__BJP": "SANTHAKUMAR_K__BJP", "RAMADURAI_P__AIFB": "RAMADURAI_P__AIFB", "VASIMALAI_P__IND": "VASIMALAI_P__IND", "DHAMOTHARAN_V__IND": "DHAMOTHARAN_V__IND", "SURESH_A__JD_U": "SURESH_A__JD_U", "SUNDARAMOORTHY_V__IND": "SUNDARAMOORTHY_V__IND", "MOHAMMED_SALEEM_M__IND": "MOHAMMED_SALEEM_M__IND", "NALLATHAMBI_N_S_V__TNJC": "NALLATHAMBI_N_S_V__TNJC", "ELAVARASAN_VEERA__MDMK": "ELAVARASAN_VEERA__MDMK", "VELUSAMY_V__DMK": "VELUSAMY_V__DMK", "DHANAPANDIYAN_T__DMDK": "DHANAPANDIYAN_T__DMDK", "OCHATHEVAR_T__BJP": "OCHATHEVAR_T__BJP", "SUNDARRAJ_C__IND": "SUNDARRAJ_C__IND", "VELUCHAMY_A__IND": "VELUCHAMY_A__IND", "GURUSAMY_P__JD_U": "GURUSAMY_P__JD_U", "RAJ_M__AIFB": "RAJ_M__AIFB", "RAMAIAH_G__BSP": "RAMAIAH_G__BSP", "MUTHUVEL_K__IND": "MUTHUVEL_K__IND", "THAVAMANI_S__IND": "THAVAMANI_S__IND", "ALAGARSAMY_P__IND": "ALAGARSAMY_P__IND", "MAHENDRAN_I__ADMK": "MAHENDRAN_I__ADMK", "KATHIRAVAN_P_V__DMK": "KATHIRAVAN_P_V__DMK", "RAJA_A_K_T__DMDK": "RAJA_A_K_T__DMDK", "SURENDRAN_K__MAG": "SURENDRAN_K__MAG", "PANNEER_SELVAM_V__BJP": "PANNEER_SELVAM_V__BJP", "MUTHIAH_PASUMPON_K__AIFB": "MUTHIAH_PASUMPON_K__AIFB", "THIRUMOORTHY_A__IND": "THIRUMOORTHY_A__IND", "SURYADEV_M__BSP": "SURYADEV_M__BSP", "ILAIYARASU_P_P__IND": "ILAIYARASU_P_P__IND", "DHANALAKSHMI_P__JD_U": "DHANALAKSHMI_P__JD_U", "THENMOZHI_S__ADMK": "THENMOZHI_S__ADMK", "SENTHILVEL_K__INC": "SENTHILVEL_K__INC", "PITCHAIAMMAL_P__BJP": "PITCHAIAMMAL_P__BJP", "SETHURAMAN_A__BSP": "SETHURAMAN_A__BSP", "PRAKALATHAN_S__IND": "PRAKALATHAN_S__IND", "NALLUSAMY_P__SP": "NALLUSAMY_P__SP", "DHANALAKSHMI_V__IND": "DHANALAKSHMI_V__IND", "SENTHILKUMAR_C__IND": "SENTHILKUMAR_C__IND", "RAJENDRAN_S__NCP": "RAJENDRAN_S__NCP", "MOORTHY_P__DMK": "MOORTHY_P__DMK", "SANTHANAM_L__ADMK": "SANTHANAM_L__ADMK", "RAJENDRAN_P__DMDK": "RAJENDRAN_P__DMDK", "KARUNANIDHI_PON__BJP": "KARUNANIDHI_PON__BJP", "AMMAVASI_P_N__AIFB": "AMMAVASI_P_N__AIFB", "MOORTHY_P__IND": "MOORTHY_P__IND", "KARADI_K__IND": "KARADI_K__IND", "NATARAJAN_M__IND": "NATARAJAN_M__IND", "SEENIVASAN_S__JD_U": "SEENIVASAN_S__JD_U", "AROCKIAMARY_T__CPI_ML_L": "AROCKIAMARY_T__CPI_ML_L", "BOSE_A_K__ADMK": "BOSE_A_K__ADMK", "VENKATESAN_S__CPM": "VENKATESAN_S__CPM", "RAJAMANICKAM_G__DMDK": "RAJAMANICKAM_G__DMDK", "SURENDRAN_S__BJP": "SURENDRAN_S__BJP", "MAHALINGAM_V_ALIAS_CHITTRARASU__BSP": "MAHALINGAM_V_ALIAS_CHITTRARASU__BSP", "ESWARAN_G__JD_U": "ESWARAN_G__JD_U", "SARATHBABU_C__IND": "SARATHBABU_C__IND", "JEYAKUMAR_M__IND": "JEYAKUMAR_M__IND", "PARAMAN_P__IND": "PARAMAN_P__IND", "SHANMUGAM_S_V__ADMK": "SHANMUGAM_S_V__ADMK", "PERUMAL_N__INC": "PERUMAL_N__INC", "MANIMARAN_DR_S__DMDK": "MANIMARAN_DR_S__DMDK", "BHAKAVATHI_P__BJP": "BHAKAVATHI_P__BJP", "RAMAKRISHNAN_B__IND": "RAMAKRISHNAN_B__IND", "SARAVANAN_L_K__AIFB": "SARAVANAN_L_K__AIFB", "KALYANASUNDARAM_T__JD_U": "KALYANASUNDARAM_T__JD_U", "SENTHUR_PANDIAN_S__IND": "SENTHUR_PANDIAN_S__IND", "PERUMAAL_D__IND": "PERUMAAL_D__IND", "MUTHUSAMY_P__IND": "MUTHUSAMY_P__IND", "SAKKANAN_V__IND": "SAKKANAN_V__IND", "TAMILMARAN_R__SBD": "TAMILMARAN_R__SBD", "RAMADASS_M__ABHM": "RAMADASS_M__ABHM", "PALANIVELRAJAN_T__DMK": "PALANIVELRAJAN_T__DMK", "JAKKAIYAN_S_T_K__ADMK": "JAKKAIYAN_S_T_K__ADMK", "SUNDARAJAN_R__DMDK": "SUNDARAJAN_R__DMDK", "JEYAKUMAR_P__IND": "JEYAKUMAR_P__IND", "MOHAMMED_RAFIK_M__IND": "MOHAMMED_RAFIK_M__IND", "SASIKUMAR_A__JP": "SASIKUMAR_A__JP", "RAJKUMAR_A__IND": "RAJKUMAR_A__IND", "GNANAPRAKASAM_J__AIFB": "GNANAPRAKASAM_J__AIFB", "INDRA_M_R__TNJC": "INDRA_M_R__TNJC", "RAJAGOPAL_R__IND": "RAJAGOPAL_R__IND", "SUDHA_P__JD_U": "SUDHA_P__JD_U", "ANAND_P__IND": "ANAND_P__IND", "BALASUBRAMANI_R__ABHM": "BALASUBRAMANI_R__ABHM", "BASKARAN_PON__SBD": "BASKARAN_PON__SBD", "KATHIRAVAN_G__IND": "KATHIRAVAN_G__IND", "NARAYANAN_M__IND": "NARAYANAN_M__IND", "SYED_ABBAS_S__IND": "SYED_ABBAS_S__IND", "NANMARAN_N__CPM": "NANMARAN_N__CPM", "BOOMINATHAN_M__MDMK": "BOOMINATHAN_M__MDMK", "DHAMODHARAN_A__DMDK": "DHAMODHARAN_A__DMDK", "PRABAKARAN_A_P__BJP": "PRABAKARAN_A_P__BJP", "SUBBAIAH_N__AIFB": "SUBBAIAH_N__AIFB", "THANGAVEL_L__IND": "THANGAVEL_L__IND", "RATHINAVELSAMY_R__IND": "RATHINAVELSAMY_R__IND", "EDWARD_P_S_P__JD_U": "EDWARD_P_S_P__JD_U", "TAMILARASI_R__DMK": "TAMILARASI_R__DMK", "LAKSHMI_P__ADMK": "LAKSHMI_P__ADMK", "BASKARAN_K__DMDK": "BASKARAN_K__DMDK", "PALANIVELUSWAMY_S__BJP": "PALANIVELUSWAMY_S__BJP", "VEERAPANDI_D__IND": "VEERAPANDI_D__IND", "RAJASINGH_R_G__AIFB": "RAJASINGH_R_G__AIFB", "PALANICHAMY_M__BSP": "PALANICHAMY_M__BSP", "MUTHUKRISHNAN_P__IND": "MUTHUKRISHNAN_P__IND", "THAMILAPPANDI_M_P__IND": "THAMILAPPANDI_M_P__IND", "SAMY_R__ADMK": "SAMY_R__ADMK", "RAVICHANDRAN_K_V_V__INC": "RAVICHANDRAN_K_V_V__INC", "RAJARAM_C_T__DMDK": "RAJARAM_C_T__DMDK", "PANNEER_SELVAM_M__BSP": "PANNEER_SELVAM_M__BSP", "VAIRAVAN_R__IND": "VAIRAVAN_R__IND", "SUBRAMANIAN_O__AIFB": "SUBRAMANIAN_O__AIFB", "PURUSHOTHAMAN_S__JP": "PURUSHOTHAMAN_S__JP", "SENGAIMUNI_R__IND": "SENGAIMUNI_R__IND", "PERIYASWAMY_C__IND": "PERIYASWAMY_C__IND", "SELVAGANESAN_K__IND": "SELVAGANESAN_K__IND", "VISWANATHAN_R__ADMK": "VISWANATHAN_R__ADMK", "ANDIAMBALAM_M_A__DMK": "ANDIAMBALAM_M_A__DMK", "GANESHAN_V__DMDK": "GANESHAN_V__DMDK", "VEDIKARAN_P__IND": "VEDIKARAN_P__IND", "SARAVANAN_A__BJP": "SARAVANAN_A__BJP", "MURUGESAN_A__BSP": "MURUGESAN_A__BSP", "ANNAMALAI_A__IND": "ANNAMALAI_A__IND", "DHAMOTHARAN_M__LJP": "DHAMOTHARAN_M__LJP", "SHEIK_MOHAMED_TAJUDEEN_S__IND": "SHEIK_MOHAMED_TAJUDEEN_S__IND", "CHANDRAN_C__IND": "CHANDRAN_C__IND", "BALABARATHI_K__CPM": "BALABARATHI_K__CPM", "SELVARAGAVAN_N__MDMK": "SELVARAGAVAN_N__MDMK", "KARTHIKEYAN_G__DMDK": "KARTHIKEYAN_G__DMDK", "PRABHAKAR_J_C_D__SP": "PRABHAKAR_J_C_D__SP", "THIRUMALAI_BALAJI_T_A__BJP": "THIRUMALAI_BALAJI_T_A__BJP", "SIVANATHAN_K__BSP": "SIVANATHAN_K__BSP", "MUTHUVEERAN_M__RSP": "MUTHUVEERAN_M__RSP", "ARUNACHALAM_M__PNK": "ARUNACHALAM_M__PNK", "PALANICHAMY_A__IND": "PALANICHAMY_A__IND", "THANIKODI_S__AIFB": "THANIKODI_S__AIFB", "NAGUCHAMY_NADAR_N__JD_U": "NAGUCHAMY_NADAR_N__JD_U", "PERIASAMY_I__DMK": "PERIASAMY_I__DMK", "SREENIVASAN_C__ADMK": "SREENIVASAN_C__ADMK", "RAJESH_PERUMAL_P__DMDK": "RAJESH_PERUMAL_P__DMDK", "MUTHURAMALINGAM_D__BJP": "MUTHURAMALINGAM_D__BJP", "MURUGANANDAM_S__IND": "MURUGANANDAM_S__IND", "SARAVANAKUMAR_P__BSP": "SARAVANAKUMAR_P__BSP", "PUTHUMAI_C__IND": "PUTHUMAI_C__IND", "POTHIRAJ_S__IND": "POTHIRAJ_S__IND", "BALUSAMY_C__IND": "BALUSAMY_C__IND", "SHANMUGAM_A__IND": "SHANMUGAM_A__IND", "SIVAKUMAR_S__IND": "SIVAKUMAR_S__IND", "SAVUBAR_NAVAHI_K_S__IND": "SAVUBAR_NAVAHI_K_S__IND", "DHANDAPANI_M__INC": "DHANDAPANI_M__INC", "PALANICHAMY_S__ADMK": "PALANICHAMY_S__ADMK", "VENKATACHALAM_S__DMDK": "VENKATACHALAM_S__DMDK", "PARAMAN_A__IND": "PARAMAN_A__IND", "PALANISAMY_N__BJP": "PALANISAMY_N__BJP", "DHAYALAN_D__BSP": "DHAYALAN_D__BSP", "THANDAPANI_S__IND": "THANDAPANI_S__IND", "SIVASUBRAMANI_DALIT_SIVA_P__IND": "SIVASUBRAMANI_DALIT_SIVA_P__IND", "RAJA_S__NCP": "RAJA_S__NCP", "RAJA_E__RLD": "RAJA_E__RLD", "ISMAIL_A__IND": "ISMAIL_A__IND", "KUMAR_P__JD_U": "KUMAR_P__JD_U", "KHALEELUR_RAHMAN_M_A__DMK": "KHALEELUR_RAHMAN_M_A__DMK", "MONJANUR_RAMASAMY_P__MDMK": "MONJANUR_RAMASAMY_P__MDMK", "BASHEER_MOHAMED_A__DMDK": "BASHEER_MOHAMED_A__DMDK", "MANOHARAN_K__BJP": "MANOHARAN_K__BJP", "RAMAMOORTHY_R__IND": "RAMAMOORTHY_R__IND", "DALIT_PANDIYAN_V__IND": "DALIT_PANDIYAN_V__IND", "BALA_SUBRAMANI_S__IND": "BALA_SUBRAMANI_S__IND", "KAJA_MOHIDEEN_M__IND": "KAJA_MOHIDEEN_M__IND", "MALLIKA_S__IND": "MALLIKA_S__IND", "DHAYALAN_R_M__IND": "DHAYALAN_R_M__IND", "SENTHIL_BALAJI_V__ADMK": "SENTHIL_BALAJI_V__ADMK", "VASUKI_MURUGESAN__DMK": "VASUKI_MURUGESAN__DMK", "RAVI_A__DMDK": "RAVI_A__DMDK", "MOHAN_P_K__BJP": "MOHAN_P_K__BJP", "VENKATARAMAN_M__IND": "VENKATARAMAN_M__IND", "JEGANATHAN_A_S__BSP": "JEGANATHAN_A_S__BSP", "MURUGESAN_RAMA__IND": "MURUGESAN_RAMA__IND", "KANAGARAJ_K__SP": "KANAGARAJ_K__SP", "MURUGESAN_M__IND": "MURUGESAN_M__IND", "BASKARAN_K__IND": "BASKARAN_K__IND", "BALUSAMY_K_P__IND": "BALUSAMY_K_P__IND", "SELVARAJ_R__IND": "SELVARAJ_R__IND", "PANDIAN_R__IND": "PANDIAN_R__IND", "SAKTHIVEL_A_K__IND": "SAKTHIVEL_A_K__IND", "SENTHIL_KUMAR_R__IND": "SENTHIL_KUMAR_R__IND", "KAMARAJ_P__DMK": "KAMARAJ_P__DMK", "SASIKALA_R__ADMK": "SASIKALA_R__ADMK", "MURUGAN_D__DMDK": "MURUGAN_D__DMDK", "LEELAVATHI_M__IND": "LEELAVATHI_M__IND", "MARUTHAVEERAN_N__IND": "MARUTHAVEERAN_N__IND", "SIVAKAMI_V__BSP": "SIVAKAMI_V__BSP", "SIVASUBRAMANIAN_A__BJP": "SIVASUBRAMANIAN_A__BJP", "PERIYASAMY_A__IND": "PERIYASAMY_A__IND", "ABIMANNAN_A__IND": "ABIMANNAN_A__IND", "PONNUSAMY_P__TNMC": "PONNUSAMY_P__TNMC", "KULANTHAVEL_R__IND": "KULANTHAVEL_R__IND", "CHINNASAMY_C__ADMK": "CHINNASAMY_C__ADMK", "ROKKAIAH_A__DMK": "ROKKAIAH_A__DMK", "KUMAR_T_KUMAR_B_T__BJP": "KUMAR_T_KUMAR_B_T__BJP", "JAMAL_MOHAMED_M__DMDK": "JAMAL_MOHAMED_M__DMDK", "PERIASAMY_V__IND": "PERIASAMY_V__IND", "FRANCIS_A__IND": "FRANCIS_A__IND", "SAKTHIVEL_C__LJP": "SAKTHIVEL_C__LJP", "PANDITHURAI_M__IND": "PANDITHURAI_M__IND", "PITCHAIMANI_S__IND": "PITCHAIMANI_S__IND", "ALAGAR_P__IND": "ALAGAR_P__IND", "AMIRTHARAJ_R__IND": "AMIRTHARAJ_R__IND", "MANICKAM_R__DMK": "MANICKAM_R__DMK", "PAPASUNDARAM_A__ADMK": "PAPASUNDARAM_A__ADMK", "VISWANATHAN_M__DMDK": "VISWANATHAN_M__DMDK", "RAJU_N_C__BJP": "RAJU_N_C__BJP", "MAHENDRAN_P__IND": "MAHENDRAN_P__IND", "NAGARAJAN_N__IND": "NAGARAJAN_N__IND", "KADIRVELU_K__BSP": "KADIRVELU_K__BSP", "BOOPATHI_R__IND": "BOOPATHI_R__IND", "MUNUSAMY_M__SP": "MUNUSAMY_M__SP", "CHINNASAMI_V__IND": "CHINNASAMI_V__IND", "KOTHAI_R__IND": "KOTHAI_R__IND", "EARACHI_P__IND": "EARACHI_P__IND", "RAJASEKHARAN_M__INC": "RAJASEKHARAN_M__INC", "NATARAJAN_R__MDMK": "NATARAJAN_R__MDMK", "KANNAIYAN_K__IND": "KANNAIYAN_K__IND", "MANOHARAN_P__DMDK": "MANOHARAN_P__DMDK", "BASKAR_V_P__IND": "BASKAR_V_P__IND", "NATESAN_N__BJP": "NATESAN_N__BJP", "SARASWATHI_G__BSP": "SARASWATHI_G__BSP", "SENTHILKUMAR_P__IND": "SENTHILKUMAR_P__IND", "USHA_C__IND": "USHA_C__IND", "RANI_R__DMK": "RANI_R__DMK", "MUTHUSAMY_P__ADMK": "MUTHUSAMY_P__ADMK", "MOOKAN__DMDK": "MOOKAN__DMDK", "RAJENDRAN__IND": "RAJENDRAN__IND", "SIVAKUMAR__BJP": "SIVAKUMAR__BJP", "RAVI_P__IND": "RAVI_P__IND", "CHELLADURAI__IND": "CHELLADURAI__IND", "SELVARAJ_N__DMK": "SELVARAJ_N__DMK", "POONACHI_T_P__ADMK": "POONACHI_T_P__ADMK", "RAJALINGAM_M__DMDK": "RAJALINGAM_M__DMDK", "VISWANATHAN_S__IND": "VISWANATHAN_S__IND", "NAGALINGAM_C__BJP": "NAGALINGAM_C__BJP", "GANESAN_S__IND": "GANESAN_S__IND", "SENTHILKUMAR_N__IND": "SENTHILKUMAR_N__IND", "ELANGO_VALLAL_P__IND": "ELANGO_VALLAL_P__IND", "SOUNDARA_PANDIAN_A__DMK": "SOUNDARA_PANDIAN_A__DMK", "RAJARAM_T__ADMK": "RAJARAM_T__ADMK", "RAMU_S__DMDK": "RAMU_S__DMDK", "RAJENDRAN_D__BJP": "RAJENDRAN_D__BJP", "GANAPATHI_A__BSP": "GANAPATHI_A__BSP", "RAJARAM_N__IND": "RAJARAM_N__IND", "MUTHUSAMY_A__IND": "MUTHUSAMY_A__IND", "DURAISAMY_P__SP": "DURAISAMY_P__SP", "KRISHNAMOORTHY_U__IND": "KRISHNAMOORTHY_U__IND", "NATARAJ_M__IND": "NATARAJ_M__IND", "BALASUBRAMANIAN_P__TNJC": "BALASUBRAMANIAN_P__TNJC", "ANBARASAN_G__IND": "ANBARASAN_G__IND", "RAJKUMAR_M__DMK": "RAJKUMAR_M__DMK", "SUNDARAM_M__ADMK": "SUNDARAM_M__ADMK", "MANIMEGALAI_P__DMDK": "MANIMEGALAI_P__DMDK", "PUGAZHENTHI_C__IND": "PUGAZHENTHI_C__IND", "BHASKARAN_K__IND": "BHASKARAN_K__IND", "PITCHAIMUTHU_R__BJP": "PITCHAIMUTHU_R__BJP", "NEETHIRAJA_P__IND": "NEETHIRAJA_P__IND", "STALIN_R__LJP": "STALIN_R__LJP", "RAJAPANDIYAN_R__BSP": "RAJAPANDIYAN_R__BSP", "SARAVANAN_K__IND": "SARAVANAN_K__IND", "CHANTHIRAKASI_M__ADMK": "CHANTHIRAKASI_M__ADMK", "GOPALAKRISHNAN_K__PMK": "GOPALAKRISHNAN_K__PMK", "GANAPATHI_M__DMDK": "GANAPATHI_M__DMDK", "JEEVA_P__IND": "JEEVA_P__IND", "CHELLASAMY_R__BSP": "CHELLASAMY_R__BSP", "PERIASAMY_D__BJP": "PERIASAMY_D__BJP", "PALANIMUTHU_M__LJP": "PALANIMUTHU_M__LJP", "AMARAMOORTHY_D__INC": "AMARAMOORTHY_D__INC", "RAVICHANDRAN_M__ADMK": "RAVICHANDRAN_M__ADMK", "JAYAVEL_RAMA__DMDK": "JAYAVEL_RAMA__DMDK", "MARIYAPPAN_K__IND": "MARIYAPPAN_K__IND", "SEKAR_K__BJP": "SEKAR_K__BJP", "SAMIDURAI_M__BSP": "SAMIDURAI_M__BSP", "SUKUMAR_G__IND": "SUKUMAR_G__IND", "CHANDRASEKAR_S_M__IND": "CHANDRASEKAR_S_M__IND", "SENTHIL_SENTHIL_KUMAR_V__IND": "SENTHIL_SENTHIL_KUMAR_V__IND", "MAHESHKUMAR_N__IND": "MAHESHKUMAR_N__IND", "SIVASANKAR_S_S__DMK": "SIVASANKAR_S_S__DMK", "PANNERSELVAM_K__ADMK": "PANNERSELVAM_K__ADMK", "PANNERSELVAM_M__DMDK": "PANNERSELVAM_M__DMDK", "RAJASEKARAN_M__BJP": "RAJASEKARAN_M__BJP", "MATHIYAZHAGAN_K__IND": "MATHIYAZHAGAN_K__IND", "SEKAR_K__BSP": "SEKAR_K__BSP", "AZHAGESAN_V_R__IND": "AZHAGESAN_V_R__IND", "SUBRAMANIYAN_M_K__IND": "SUBRAMANIYAN_M_K__IND", "RAJENDRAN_K__ADMK": "RAJENDRAN_K__ADMK", "GURU_GURUNATHAN_J__PMK": "GURU_GURUNATHAN_J__PMK", "JOHNSON_M__DMDK": "JOHNSON_M__DMDK", "SENTHAMILSELVI_K__IND": "SENTHAMILSELVI_K__IND", "SASIKUMAR_R__BJP": "SASIKUMAR_R__BJP", "UMAPATHI_V__BSP": "UMAPATHI_V__BSP", "KAVIYARASI_E__IND": "KAVIYARASI_E__IND", "AYYAPPAN_R__IND": "AYYAPPAN_R__IND", "PARANJOTHI_M__ADMK": "PARANJOTHI_M__ADMK", "JEROME_AROKIARAJ_G__INC": "JEROME_AROKIARAJ_G__INC", "RAMESH_A__DMDK": "RAMESH_A__DMDK", "PARTHIBAN_P__BJP": "PARTHIBAN_P__BJP", "MEIYANATHAN_K__IND": "MEIYANATHAN_K__IND", "RAVISANKAR_IYER_N__ABHM": "RAVISANKAR_IYER_N__ABHM", "DALIT_IILAYAMARAN_ALIAS_PALANIVEL__IND": "DALIT_IILAYAMARAN_ALIAS_PALANIVEL__IND", "PERIYASAMY_A__BSP": "PERIYASAMY_A__BSP", "MUNIYAPPAN_K__IND": "MUNIYAPPAN_K__IND", "MAHALAKSHMI_M__AIFB": "MAHALAKSHMI_M__AIFB", "VELUSAMY_S__SP": "VELUSAMY_S__SP", "MARIYA_RUSVELT_M__IND": "MARIYA_RUSVELT_M__IND", "CHINNADURAI_M_P__IND": "CHINNADURAI_M_P__IND", "THANGAVEL_S__IND": "THANGAVEL_S__IND", "ANBIL_PERIASAMY__DMK": "ANBIL_PERIASAMY__DMK", "MALARMANNAN_A__MDMK": "MALARMANNAN_A__MDMK", "UMA_P__DMDK": "UMA_P__DMDK", "THIRUMALAI_R__BJP": "THIRUMALAI_R__BJP", "RAMANAN_S__IND": "RAMANAN_S__IND", "MALARMANNAN_A__IND": "MALARMANNAN_A__IND", "RAFIQ_AHAMED_M__IND": "RAFIQ_AHAMED_M__IND", "KALIAMOORTHY_S__AIFB": "KALIAMOORTHY_S__AIFB", "SHAHUL_HAMEED_P_M__LJP": "SHAHUL_HAMEED_P_M__LJP", "RENGAN_M__ABHM": "RENGAN_M__ABHM", "SURESH_KUMAR_D__JD_U": "SURESH_KUMAR_D__JD_U", "NEHRU_K_N__DMK": "NEHRU_K_N__DMK", "MARIYAMPITCHAI_N__ADMK": "MARIYAMPITCHAI_N__ADMK", "SENDHURESWARAN_A_D__DMDK": "SENDHURESWARAN_A_D__DMDK", "MATHIARASAN_M__BJP": "MATHIARASAN_M__BJP", "ELANGOVAN_R__BSP": "ELANGOVAN_R__BSP", "RAJA_MOHAMED_A__IND": "RAJA_MOHAMED_A__IND", "RAVICHANDRAN_M__IND": "RAVICHANDRAN_M__IND", "BALAKRISHNAN_K__ABHM": "BALAKRISHNAN_K__ABHM", "MOHAN_D__IND": "MOHAN_D__IND", "MURUGAN_T__IND": "MURUGAN_T__IND", "MURALIDHARAN_S__IND": "MURALIDHARAN_S__IND", "SEKARAN_K_N__DMK": "SEKARAN_K_N__DMK", "SRIDHAR_VANDAYAR__ADMK": "SRIDHAR_VANDAYAR__ADMK", "THANGAMANI_K__DMDK": "THANGAMANI_K__DMDK", "PARVATHI_N__BJP": "PARVATHI_N__BJP", "MAYILSAMY_M__IND": "MAYILSAMY_M__IND", "MUTHUKUMAR_S__IND": "MUTHUKUMAR_S__IND", "MAHALAKSHMI_E__BSP": "MAHALAKSHMI_E__BSP", "SANTHI_V__IND": "SANTHI_V__IND", "MUTHUKUMARAN_M__IND": "MUTHUKUMARAN_M__IND", "PANNERSELVAM_M__DMK": "PANNERSELVAM_M__DMK", "DURAIRAJAN_P__VCK": "DURAIRAJAN_P__VCK", "BALAKRISHNAN_PON__DMDK": "BALAKRISHNAN_PON__DMDK", "GUNASEKARAN_N__CPI_ML_L": "GUNASEKARAN_N__CPI_ML_L", "MUTHUBALAKRISHNAN_M__IND": "MUTHUBALAKRISHNAN_M__IND", "ELAVAZHAGAN_S__BJP": "ELAVAZHAGAN_S__BJP", "TAMILMARAN_K__SP": "TAMILMARAN_K__SP", "DEVENDRAN_S__BSP": "DEVENDRAN_S__BSP", "PERIYASAMY_K__PMK": "PERIYASAMY_K__PMK", "POUNRAJ_S__ADMK": "POUNRAJ_S__ADMK", "MAYA_VENKATESAN_M__SP": "MAYA_VENKATESAN_M__SP", "PRABAKARAN_V_R__DMDK": "PRABAKARAN_V_R__DMDK", "KRISHNAMOORTHY_K_A__BJP": "KRISHNAMOORTHY_K_A__BJP", "VENGATESAN_MARI__IND": "VENGATESAN_MARI__IND", "KARUNANITHI_A__IJP": "KARUNANITHI_A__IJP", "CHAKRAVARTHI_K__IND": "CHAKRAVARTHI_K__IND", "SARASWATHI_M__BSP": "SARASWATHI_M__BSP", "MALARVIZHI_D__IND": "MALARVIZHI_D__IND", "RAJAKUMAR_S__INC": "RAJAKUMAR_S__INC", "MAHALINGAM_M__MDMK": "MAHALINGAM_M__MDMK", "RAJENDAR_T_VIJAYA__IND": "RAJENDAR_T_VIJAYA__IND", "THAVAMANI_P__DMDK": "THAVAMANI_P__DMDK", "VASUDEVAN_P__BJP": "VASUDEVAN_P__BJP", "MUTHUSAMY_P__BSP": "MUTHUSAMY_P__BSP", "AMEENULLAH_S__TNJC": "AMEENULLAH_S__TNJC", "RAJENDRAN_S__IND": "RAJENDRAN_S__IND", "SUBRAMANIYAN_A__SP": "SUBRAMANIYAN_A__SP", "ANBAZHAGAN_K_KUTTALAM__DMK": "ANBAZHAGAN_K_KUTTALAM__DMK", "RAJENDRAN_S__ADMK": "RAJENDRAN_S__ADMK", "SARANGAMBANI_K__DMDK": "SARANGAMBANI_K__DMDK", "KATHAMUTHUSHARMA_R__SP": "KATHAMUTHUSHARMA_R__SP", "MOHANASUNDARAM_T__BJP": "MOHANASUNDARAM_T__BJP", "KUDIYARASAN_R__BSP": "KUDIYARASAN_R__BSP", "PADMAVATHY_P__CPI": "PADMAVATHY_P__CPI", "ARIVANANDAM_K__ADMK": "ARIVANANDAM_K__ADMK", "RAJENDRAN_R__DMDK": "RAJENDRAN_R__DMDK", "SOORIYAMOORTHY_R__BJP": "SOORIYAMOORTHY_R__BJP", "MATHIVANAN_U__DMK": "MATHIVANAN_U__DMK", "THANGAMANI_A__ADMK": "THANGAMANI_A__ADMK", "MOHANKUMAR_N__DMDK": "MOHANKUMAR_N__DMDK", "DR_GANESAN_A__BJP": "DR_GANESAN_A__BJP", "VEERAMANI_A_P__IND": "VEERAMANI_A_P__IND", "RAMALINGAM_R__IND": "RAMALINGAM_R__IND", "RAJAPANDIYAN_S__BSP": "RAJAPANDIYAN_S__BSP", "MARIMUTHU_V__CPM": "MARIMUTHU_V__CPM", "JAYAPAL_K_A__ADMK": "JAYAPAL_K_A__ADMK", "MATHIYALAGAN_PERU__DMDK": "MATHIYALAGAN_PERU__DMDK", "KARTHIKEYAN_S__BJP": "KARTHIKEYAN_S__BJP", "BASHEER_S__NCP": "BASHEER_S__NCP", "PANNEERSELVAM_R__BSP": "PANNEERSELVAM_R__BSP", "VEDARATHINAM_S_K__DMK": "VEDARATHINAM_S_K__DMK", "MANIYAN_O_S__ADMK": "MANIYAN_O_S__ADMK", "VEERAVINAYAGAM_B__DMDK": "VEERAVINAYAGAM_B__DMDK", "UDAYAKUMAR_M__BJP": "UDAYAKUMAR_M__BJP", "MAHENDRAN_G__SP": "MAHENDRAN_G__SP", "VEDARATHINAM_G__IND": "VEDARATHINAM_G__IND", "SURYA_S_T__BSP": "SURYA_S_T__BSP", "KATHIRESAN_G__IND": "KATHIRESAN_G__IND", "SRINIVASAN_M__IND": "SRINIVASAN_M__IND", "RAMAMURTHI_R__IND": "RAMAMURTHI_R__IND", "ULAGANATHAN_K__CPI": "ULAGANATHAN_K__CPI", "UMADEVI_A__ADMK": "UMADEVI_A__ADMK", "MOHANKUMAR_K__DMDK": "MOHANKUMAR_K__DMDK", "SHIVASHANMUGAM_P__BJP": "SHIVASHANMUGAM_P__BJP", "JAYAKUMAR_M__NCP": "JAYAKUMAR_M__NCP", "RAJENDRAN_N__BSP": "RAJENDRAN_N__BSP", "SIVAPUNNIYAM_V__CPI": "SIVAPUNNIYAM_V__CPI", "KAMARAJ_R__ADMK": "KAMARAJ_R__ADMK", "MUTHIYA_N__DMDK": "MUTHIYA_N__DMDK", "KALAYANARAMAN_K__BJP": "KALAYANARAMAN_K__BJP", "MUTHULINGAM_V__IND": "MUTHULINGAM_V__IND", "NAGOOR_GANI_A__IND": "NAGOOR_GANI_A__IND", "GURUSAMI_K__IND": "GURUSAMI_K__IND", "RENGARAJAN_N_R__INC": "RENGARAJAN_N_R__INC", "VISWANATHAN_S__MDMK": "VISWANATHAN_S__MDMK", "SENTHILKUMAR_N__DMDK": "SENTHILKUMAR_N__DMDK", "JAYABAL_P__IND": "JAYABAL_P__IND", "THOUFEEQ_S__BSP": "THOUFEEQ_S__BSP", "RAVICHANDIRAN_M__BJP": "RAVICHANDIRAN_M__BJP", "SAMINATHAN_CHINNA__AIFB": "SAMINATHAN_CHINNA__AIFB", "VEERAKAPILAN_M_V_R__ADMK": "VEERAKAPILAN_M_V_R__ADMK", "THIRUGNANASAMBANDAM_S_V__INC": "THIRUGNANASAMBANDAM_S_V__INC", "PALANIVEL_V_S_K__DMDK": "PALANIVEL_V_S_K__DMDK", "THIYAGARAJAN_D__BJP": "THIYAGARAJAN_D__BJP", "SATHIYAMOORTHY_M__IND": "SATHIYAMOORTHY_M__IND", "ANTHONYRAJA_M__IND": "ANTHONYRAJA_M__IND", "VAITHILINGAM_R__ADMK": "VAITHILINGAM_R__ADMK", "RAJAMANICKAM_P__DMK": "RAJAMANICKAM_P__DMK", "RAMESH_R__DMDK": "RAMESH_R__DMDK", "MAHENDRAN_T__BJP": "MAHENDRAN_T__BJP", "MAHESH_KRISHNASAMY_T__DMK": "MAHESH_KRISHNASAMY_T__DMK", "THANGAMUTHU_K__ADMK": "THANGAMUTHU_K__ADMK", "SIVAKUMAR_M__DMDK": "SIVAKUMAR_M__DMDK", "GOVINDARAJ_S__IND": "GOVINDARAJ_S__IND", "MOOKKAIYAN_V__BJP": "MOOKKAIYAN_V__BJP", "ARJUNAN_MALAI__IND": "ARJUNAN_MALAI__IND", "SATHIYAMOORTHY_T__SP": "SATHIYAMOORTHY_T__SP", "RAVI_N__BSP": "RAVI_N__BSP", "UBAYADULLAH_S_N_M__DMK": "UBAYADULLAH_S_N_M__DMK", "RENGASAMY_M__ADMK": "RENGASAMY_M__ADMK", "SIVANESAN_P__DMDK": "SIVANESAN_P__DMDK", "RAMALINGAM_M_S__BJP": "RAMALINGAM_M_S__BJP", "NAGENDRAN_A__IND": "NAGENDRAN_A__IND", "PALANISAMY_M__SP": "PALANISAMY_M__SP", "SOZHAMANNAR_KANAKARAJA_K__IND": "SOZHAMANNAR_KANAKARAJA_K__IND", "CHANDRASEKARAN_DURAI__DMK": "CHANDRASEKARAN_DURAI__DMK", "GOVINDARAJAN_DURAI__ADMK": "GOVINDARAJAN_DURAI__ADMK", "MAHENDRAN_N__DMDK": "MAHENDRAN_N__DMDK", "KUMARAVELU_C__BJP": "KUMARAVELU_C__BJP", "SURESH_T__BSP": "SURESH_T__BSP", "RAJESH_K__IND": "RAJESH_K__IND", "MATHIAZHAGAN_A__IND": "MATHIAZHAGAN_A__IND", "DORAIKKANNU_R__ADMK": "DORAIKKANNU_R__ADMK", "RAMKUMAR_M__INC": "RAMKUMAR_M__INC", "MARUTHAIYAN_N__DMDK": "MARUTHAIYAN_N__DMDK", "VASUDEVAN_R__BJP": "VASUDEVAN_R__BJP", "SANGEETHA_R__BSP": "SANGEETHA_R__BSP", "MOHAN_A_M__AIFB": "MOHAN_A_M__AIFB", "DURAI_BURHANUDEEN_A__SP": "DURAI_BURHANUDEEN_A__SP", "ILAMATHI_SUBRAMANIAN__ADMK": "ILAMATHI_SUBRAMANIAN__ADMK", "SENTHAMIL_CHELVAN_S__DMK": "SENTHAMIL_CHELVAN_S__DMK", "SOORIYAMURTHI_R__DMDK": "SOORIYAMURTHI_R__DMDK", "SENTHILKUMAR_A__BSP": "SENTHILKUMAR_A__BSP", "PALANIAPPAN_PURATCHIKAVIDHASAN_M__BJP": "PALANIAPPAN_PURATCHIKAVIDHASAN_M__BJP", "MANI_KO_SI__DMK": "MANI_KO_SI__DMK", "ERAMANATHAN_RAMA__ADMK": "ERAMANATHAN_RAMA__ADMK", "DEVADOSS_KUPPAL_G__DMDK": "DEVADOSS_KUPPAL_G__DMDK", "GODHANDARAMAN_R__BJP": "GODHANDARAMAN_R__BJP", "VENKATRAMANI_R__IND": "VENKATRAMANI_R__IND", "RAMAKRISHNAN_T__BSP": "RAMAKRISHNAN_T__BSP", "SANKARANARAYANAN_A__SP": "SANKARANARAYANAN_A__SP", "BHARATHIMOHAN_R_K__ADMK": "BHARATHIMOHAN_R_K__ADMK", "ALAYAMANI_G__PMK": "ALAYAMANI_G__PMK", "SANKAR_G__DMDK": "SANKAR_G__DMDK", "VASUDEVAN_K__IND": "VASUDEVAN_K__IND", "ANSAR_ALI_H__IND": "ANSAR_ALI_H__IND", "ELANGO_S__SP": "ELANGO_S__SP", "SOWRIRAJAN_B__BJP": "SOWRIRAJAN_B__BJP", "NANTHA_GOPAL_G_E__IND": "NANTHA_GOPAL_G_E__IND", "KANNAN_M__BSP": "KANNAN_M__BSP", "PURATCHI_VENDHAN_S__IND": "PURATCHI_VENDHAN_S__IND", "GANESH_BABU_M__IND": "GANESH_BABU_M__IND", "JAYABAL_S_B__TNJC": "JAYABAL_S_B__TNJC", "PAZHANIVEL_K__IND": "PAZHANIVEL_K__IND", "SUBBURAM_RM__INC": "SUBBURAM_RM__INC", "RADHAKRISHNAN_M__ADMK": "RADHAKRISHNAN_M__ADMK", "KRISHNAN_KU_PA__BJP": "KRISHNAN_KU_PA__BJP", "MURUGESAN_R__DMDK": "MURUGESAN_R__DMDK", "CHELLAKKANNU_K__BSP": "CHELLAKKANNU_K__BSP", "RADHAKRISHNAN_A__IND": "RADHAKRISHNAN_A__IND", "VENGKATESAN_R__TNJC": "VENGKATESAN_R__TNJC", "NARAYANAN_S__IND": "NARAYANAN_S__IND", "RAVICHANDRAN_R__IND": "RAVICHANDRAN_R__IND", "SUBRAMANIAYAN_M__IND": "SUBRAMANIAYAN_M__IND", "SUBRAMANIAN_N__ADMK": "SUBRAMANIAN_N__ADMK", "PARANJOTHI_C__DMK": "PARANJOTHI_C__DMK", "UDAYAKUMAR_M__DMDK": "UDAYAKUMAR_M__DMDK", "VELUSAMY_N__BJP": "VELUSAMY_N__BJP", "MURUGESAN_P__IND": "MURUGESAN_P__IND", "PALANIVELU_A__IND": "PALANIVELU_A__IND", "RAJU_A__IND": "RAJU_A__IND", "NEDUNCHEZHIAN_R__ADMK": "NEDUNCHEZHIAN_R__ADMK", "JAFFARALI_M__DMK": "JAFFARALI_M__DMK", "DURAI_DHIVIYANATHAN__BJP": "DURAI_DHIVIYANATHAN__BJP", "JAVAHEER_S__DMDK": "JAVAHEER_S__DMDK", "ARUMUGAM_M__TNJC": "ARUMUGAM_M__TNJC", "VIJAYAKUMAR_P__IND": "VIJAYAKUMAR_P__IND", "VETRISELVAM_A__IND": "VETRISELVAM_A__IND", "KASI_VIDUTHALAIKKUMARAN__CPI_ML_L": "KASI_VIDUTHALAIKKUMARAN__CPI_ML_L", "LEO_RAMESH__IND": "LEO_RAMESH__IND", "RAJINIKANTH_M__IND": "RAJINIKANTH_M__IND", "SRINIVASAN_G__PNK": "SRINIVASAN_G__PNK", "MARIMUTHU_T__IND": "MARIMUTHU_T__IND", "PANDIAN_A__IND": "PANDIAN_A__IND", "RAJASEKARAN_S__CPI": "RAJASEKARAN_S__CPI", "VENKATACHALAM_A__ADMK": "VENKATACHALAM_A__ADMK", "SELVINRAJ_K__DMDK": "SELVINRAJ_K__DMDK", "RAJAPARAMASIVAM__IND": "RAJAPARAMASIVAM__IND", "JEEVANANDHAM_R__BJP": "JEEVANANDHAM_R__BJP", "KARUPPAIAH_K__BSP": "KARUPPAIAH_K__BSP", "SIVAKUMAR_DURAI__IND": "SIVAKUMAR_DURAI__IND", "UDAYAM_SHANMUGAM__DMK": "UDAYAM_SHANMUGAM__DMK", "KARTHIKEYAN_Y__ADMK": "KARTHIKEYAN_Y__ADMK", "MOHAMED_ALI_JINNAH_O_S_M__DMDK": "MOHAMED_ALI_JINNAH_O_S_M__DMDK", "KATHAMUTHU_KL__BJP": "KATHAMUTHU_KL__BJP", "RAMANATHAN_G__IND": "RAMANATHAN_G__IND", "MUDIAPPAN_G__IND": "MUDIAPPAN_G__IND", "MUNUSAMY_K__IND": "MUNUSAMY_K__IND", "HUSSAIN_BEEVI_K_P__IND": "HUSSAIN_BEEVI_K_P__IND", "MAHALINGAM_N__IND": "MAHALINGAM_N__IND", "SIVASUBRAMANIAN_R__IND": "SIVASUBRAMANIAN_R__IND", "SARAVANAKKUMAR_V__IND": "SARAVANAKKUMAR_V__IND", "KATHAMUTHU_M__IND": "KATHAMUTHU_M__IND", "PERIYAKARUPPAN_K_R__DMK": "PERIYAKARUPPAN_K_R__DMK", "UMADHEVAN_K_K__ADMK": "UMADHEVAN_K_K__ADMK", "ALAGURAJ_M__DMDK": "ALAGURAJ_M__DMDK", "SIVARAMAN_S__BJP": "SIVARAMAN_S__BJP", "LAKSHMI_G__IND": "LAKSHMI_G__IND", "AKBAR_A_P__BSP": "AKBAR_A_P__BSP", "SUNDARAM_N__INC": "SUNDARAM_N__INC", "VENKATACHALAM_O_L__ADMK": "VENKATACHALAM_O_L__ADMK", "BASKARAN_D__DMDK": "BASKARAN_D__DMDK", "RAMAN_NK__BJP": "RAMAN_NK__BJP", "MOHAMED_HANIFA_H__IND": "MOHAMED_HANIFA_H__IND", "ALAGAPPAN_PL__IND": "ALAGAPPAN_PL__IND", "RAMASAMY_K_R__INC": "RAMASAMY_K_R__INC", "ANIMUTHU_C__ADMK": "ANIMUTHU_C__ADMK", "THIRUVENGADAM_P__DMDK": "THIRUVENGADAM_P__DMDK", "ERULAIYA_S__BJP": "ERULAIYA_S__BJP", "SUBRAMANIAN_K__BSP": "SUBRAMANIAN_K__BSP", "LIYAKATH_ALI_R__IND": "LIYAKATH_ALI_R__IND", "ROWTHAR_NAINAR_MOHAMED_A__IND": "ROWTHAR_NAINAR_MOHAMED_A__IND", "SIVA_S__SP": "SIVA_S__SP", "RAJAKANNAPPAN_R_S__DMK": "RAJAKANNAPPAN_R_S__DMK", "AYYACHAMY_K__ADMK": "AYYACHAMY_K__ADMK", "MANIMARAN_V__DMDK": "MANIMARAN_V__DMDK", "DEIVENDRAN_M__BJP": "DEIVENDRAN_M__BJP", "MURUGESAN_R__IND": "MURUGESAN_R__IND", "SARAVANAN_M__AIFB": "SARAVANAN_M__AIFB", "SETHUBATHI_DURAI_S__BSP": "SETHUBATHI_DURAI_S__BSP", "AYYASAMY_S__IND": "AYYASAMY_S__IND", "BALAKRISHNAN_S_S__JD_U": "BALAKRISHNAN_S_S__JD_U", "BASKARAN_R__IND": "BASKARAN_R__IND", "KRISHNAN_S_A__IND": "KRISHNAN_S_A__IND", "GUNASEKARAN_S__CPI": "GUNASEKARAN_S__CPI", "SEVANTHIAPPAN_S__MDMK": "SEVANTHIAPPAN_S__MDMK", "RAJASEKARAN_V__IND": "RAJASEKARAN_V__IND", "BALU_CR__DMDK": "BALU_CR__DMDK", "DHANALAKSHMI__IND": "DHANALAKSHMI__IND", "SWAMINAATHAN_S_R__BJP": "SWAMINAATHAN_S_R__BJP", "SELVAM_M__IND": "SELVAM_M__IND", "SUNDARAPANDIAN_M__IND": "SUNDARAPANDIAN_M__IND", "SELVARAJ_M__BSP": "SELVARAJ_M__BSP", "RAJADURAI_P_R__AIFB": "RAJADURAI_P_R__AIFB", "GUNASEKARAN_M__ADMK": "GUNASEKARAN_M__ADMK", "PARAMALAI_K__INC": "PARAMALAI_K__INC", "MAYANDI_P__DMDK": "MAYANDI_P__DMDK", "AYYADURAI_R__BJP": "AYYADURAI_R__BJP", "ARUMUGAM_K__TNJC": "ARUMUGAM_K__TNJC", "KAMALAKANNAN_K__IND": "KAMALAKANNAN_K__IND", "ALWARSAMY_R__BSP": "ALWARSAMY_R__BSP", "RAMACHANDRAN_C__IND": "RAMACHANDRAN_C__IND", "RAMPRABHU_R__INC": "RAMPRABHU_R__INC", "SUNDARARAJ_DR_S__ADMK": "SUNDARARAJ_DR_S__ADMK", "THIRUMAMALAI_RAJA_A__DMDK": "THIRUMAMALAI_RAJA_A__DMDK", "UGRAPANDIAN_K__BJP": "UGRAPANDIAN_K__BJP", "KALIDASS_A__BSP": "KALIDASS_A__BSP", "KAMARASAN_U__IND": "KAMARASAN_U__IND", "SELVAM_L__IND": "SELVAM_L__IND", "KARUPPAIAH_C__IND": "KARUPPAIAH_C__IND", "PONVENDA_SOLAN_N__JD_U": "PONVENDA_SOLAN_N__JD_U", "ALAGU_M__IND": "ALAGU_M__IND", "HUSSAN_ALI_K__INC": "HUSSAN_ALI_K__INC", "PALANICHAMY_M__MDMK": "PALANICHAMY_M__MDMK", "DHARMARAJ_S__DMDK": "DHARMARAJ_S__DMDK", "SATHIAH_A__BJP": "SATHIAH_A__BJP", "RAJENDIRAN_C__IND": "RAJENDIRAN_C__IND", "MUTHUKUMAR_R__AIFB": "MUTHUKUMAR_R__AIFB", "VEERASEKARAN_R__JD_U": "VEERASEKARAN_R__JD_U", "MANICKAM_V__IND": "MANICKAM_V__IND", "MURUGESAN_A_M__IND": "MURUGESAN_A_M__IND", "JOTHIBALAN_K__TNJC": "JOTHIBALAN_K__TNJC", "ALLAPICHAI_E__IND": "ALLAPICHAI_E__IND", "MANI_A__IND": "MANI_A__IND", "SURESH_KUMAR_B__IND": "SURESH_KUMAR_B__IND", "ILANGOVAN_K__IND": "ILANGOVAN_K__IND", "THANGAVELAN_SUBA__DMK": "THANGAVELAN_SUBA__DMK", "SATHIAMOORTHY_V__ADMK": "SATHIAMOORTHY_V__ADMK", "SINGAI_JINNAH_S__DMDK": "SINGAI_JINNAH_S__DMDK", "SABAPATHY_K__SP": "SABAPATHY_K__SP", "SATISH_KUMAR_P__BSP": "SATISH_KUMAR_P__BSP", "THANGARAJ_PANDIAN_D__AIFB": "THANGARAJ_PANDIAN_D__AIFB", "SUDALAI_MADAN_R__BJP": "SUDALAI_MADAN_R__BJP", "NAGANATHAN_M_S__IND": "NAGANATHAN_M_S__IND", "MALAICHAMY_A__TNJC": "MALAICHAMY_A__TNJC", "MURUGAVEL_K__DMK": "MURUGAVEL_K__DMK", "KALIMUTHU_S_P__ADMK": "KALIMUTHU_S_P__ADMK", "SHANMUGARAJ_K__BJP": "SHANMUGARAJ_K__BJP", "THANIKODI_K__AIFB": "THANIKODI_K__AIFB", "MOHANDASS_P__BSP": "MOHANDASS_P__BSP", "BALAN_R__IND": "BALAN_R__IND", "GURUSAMY_V__IND": "GURUSAMY_V__IND", "VANCHI_NARAYANAN_P__LKPT": "VANCHI_NARAYANAN_P__LKPT", "BALAMUNIYANDI_M__JD_U": "BALAMUNIYANDI_M__JD_U", "THANGAM_THENNARASU__DMK": "THANGAM_THENNARASU__DMK", "MURUGAN_K__ADMK": "MURUGAN_K__ADMK", "BHARATHI_THASAN_A__DMDK": "BHARATHI_THASAN_A__DMDK", "KRISHNA_GHANDHI_P__AIFB": "KRISHNA_GHANDHI_P__AIFB", "CHELLA_DURAI_PANDIAN_E__BJP": "CHELLA_DURAI_PANDIAN_E__BJP", "MANNAN_K__IND": "MANNAN_K__IND", "MARUTHUPANDI_R__IND": "MARUTHUPANDI_R__IND", "SAMYRAJ_A__IND": "SAMYRAJ_A__IND", "KARUPPAIAH_V__IND": "KARUPPAIAH_V__IND", "KANNIAH_THEVAR_M__IND": "KANNIAH_THEVAR_M__IND", "RAMACHANDRAN_K_K_S_S_R__DMK": "RAMACHANDRAN_K_K_S_S_R__DMK", "CHOCKESWARAN_G__ADMK": "CHOCKESWARAN_G__ADMK", "SANKARALINGAM_S_S_K__DMDK": "SANKARALINGAM_S_S_K__DMDK", "RAJENDRAN_R__BSP": "RAJENDRAN_R__BSP", "SETHU_RAMALINGAM_G__AIFB": "SETHU_RAMALINGAM_G__AIFB", "VAIRAMUTHU_G__IND": "VAIRAMUTHU_G__IND", "VETRIVEL_R__BJP": "VETRIVEL_R__BJP", "RAMACHANDRAN_R__IND": "RAMACHANDRAN_R__IND", "MARIMUTHU_C__IND": "MARIMUTHU_C__IND", "MANOHARAN_K__IND": "MANOHARAN_K__IND", "BALAMURUGAN_N__IND": "BALAMURUGAN_N__IND", "SELVAM_SAVURIRAJ_J__IND": "SELVAM_SAVURIRAJ_J__IND", "RAMESH_R_R__IND": "RAMESH_R_R__IND", "AMUDHA_S__IND": "AMUDHA_S__IND", "MANOHARAN_V__IND": "MANOHARAN_V__IND", "VARADHARAJAN_R__MDMK": "VARADHARAJAN_R__MDMK", "DAMODARAN_S__INC": "DAMODARAN_S__INC", "SUBBURAJ_A__DMDK": "SUBBURAJ_A__DMDK", "SELVAKUMARESAN_A__BSP": "SELVAKUMARESAN_A__BSP", "SELVAM_A__AIFB": "SELVAM_A__AIFB", "ESWARAN_M__BJP": "ESWARAN_M__BJP", "RAMAR_P__IND": "RAMAR_P__IND", "DURAIRAJA_P_T_C__IND": "DURAIRAJA_P_T_C__IND", "MURUGAN_R__IND": "MURUGAN_R__IND", "GNANADOSS_R__MDMK": "GNANADOSS_R__MDMK", "THANGARAJ_V__DMK": "THANGARAJ_V__DMK", "RAJENDRAN_V__DMDK": "RAJENDRAN_V__DMDK", "MANIKANDAN_T__AIFB": "MANIKANDAN_T__AIFB", "RAJENDRAN_K__BSP": "RAJENDRAN_K__BSP", "RAGMATHULLAH_J__IND": "RAGMATHULLAH_J__IND", "PARATHASARATHY_G__BJP": "PARATHASARATHY_G__BJP", "AROKYIARAJ_V__IND": "AROKYIARAJ_V__IND", "KANIRAJAN_J__IND": "KANIRAJAN_J__IND", "THALAIMALAIRAJA_M__IND": "THALAIMALAIRAJA_M__IND", "KUMARESAN_R__IND": "KUMARESAN_R__IND", "THANGAMUNIYANDI_V__IND": "THANGAMUNIYANDI_V__IND", "SUBBURAJ_K__IND": "SUBBURAJ_K__IND", "RAMASAMY_T__CPI": "RAMASAMY_T__CPI", "VINAYAGAMOORTHY_R__ADMK": "VINAYAGAMOORTHY_R__ADMK", "DHAMOTHARAKANNAN_R__DMDK": "DHAMOTHARAKANNAN_R__DMDK", "RAMARAJ_T__BSP": "RAMARAJ_T__BSP", "MURUGAN_P__AIFB": "MURUGAN_P__AIFB", "GNANAPANDITHAN_P__BJP": "GNANAPANDITHAN_P__BJP", "MARIAPPAN_I__IND": "MARIAPPAN_I__IND", "RAMASAMY_M__IND": "RAMASAMY_M__IND", "KARMEGARAJAN_S__IND": "KARMEGARAJAN_S__IND", "ALAGARSAMY_V__IND": "ALAGARSAMY_V__IND", "MAHALINGAM_U__IND": "MAHALINGAM_U__IND", "CHANDRA_M__ADMK": "CHANDRA_M__ADMK", "RAJAN_V_P__DMK": "RAJAN_V_P__DMK", "KALIMUTHU_P__BSP": "KALIMUTHU_P__BSP", "AYYANAR_N__DMDK": "AYYANAR_N__DMDK", "VIJAYAKUMARI_R__AIFB": "VIJAYAKUMARI_R__AIFB", "CHELLAPANDI_M__BJP": "CHELLAPANDI_M__BJP", "MUNIASAMY_P__IND": "MUNIASAMY_P__IND", "MADASAMY_I__IND": "MADASAMY_I__IND", "MANMATHAN_M__IND": "MANMATHAN_M__IND", "PERIYASHAMY_A__IND": "PERIYASHAMY_A__IND", "DURAIBALAN_D__IND": "DURAIBALAN_D__IND", "SEEINIVASAN_V__IND": "SEEINIVASAN_V__IND", "THANGAMUTHU_M__IND": "THANGAMUTHU_M__IND", "CHINNAPPAN_P__ADMK": "CHINNAPPAN_P__ADMK", "RAJARAM_K__DMK": "RAJARAM_K__DMK", "BALAKRISHNAN_S__DMDK": "BALAKRISHNAN_S__DMDK", "LINGARAJ__BSP": "LINGARAJ__BSP", "JAYARAJ_V_P__BJP": "JAYARAJ_V_P__BJP", "NATARAJ_A__IND": "NATARAJ_A__IND", "MURUGAPANDIAN_R__AIFB": "MURUGAPANDIAN_R__AIFB", "GANDHI_M__IND": "GANDHI_M__IND", "THANGAMUTHU_T__JD_U": "THANGAMUTHU_T__JD_U", "ALAGESAN_L__IND": "ALAGESAN_L__IND", "KRISHNASAMY_K__BSP": "KRISHNASAMY_K__BSP", "RAJAMANNAR_S_X__DMK": "RAJAMANNAR_S_X__DMK", "MOHANRAJ_K__DMDK": "MOHANRAJ_K__DMDK", "KOTHANDARAMAN_V__AIFB": "KOTHANDARAMAN_V__AIFB", "MUTHURAJ__IND": "MUTHURAJ__IND", "SANTHANAKUMAR_A__BJP": "SANTHANAKUMAR_A__BJP", "MADASAMY__IND": "MADASAMY__IND", "SENDURPANDI_T__IND": "SENDURPANDI_T__IND", "SURESHKUMAR_R__IND": "SURESHKUMAR_R__IND", "PERUMAL__IND": "PERUMAL__IND", "RADHAKRISHNAN_L__ADMK": "RADHAKRISHNAN_L__ADMK", "RAJENDRAN_S__CPI": "RAJENDRAN_S__CPI", "SRINIVASARAGHAVAN_T__DMDK": "SRINIVASARAGHAVAN_T__DMDK", "KOVILSELVAN_K__BSP": "KOVILSELVAN_K__BSP", "CHELLADURAI_S__AIFB": "CHELLADURAI_S__AIFB", "VISWANATHAN_V__IND": "VISWANATHAN_V__IND", "SOMASUNDARAM_G__BJP": "SOMASUNDARAM_G__BJP", "MUTHUMARIAPPAN_R__IND": "MUTHUMARIAPPAN_R__IND", "KALYANASUNDARAM_S_D__IND": "KALYANASUNDARAM_S_D__IND", "LOGANATHAN_K_V_K__IND": "LOGANATHAN_K_V_K__IND", "MUTHURAJ_I__IND": "MUTHURAJ_I__IND", "KARUPPASAMY_C__ADMK": "KARUPPASAMY_C__ADMK", "THANGAVELU_S__DMK": "THANGAVELU_S__DMK", "KARUPPASAMY_A__BSP": "KARUPPASAMY_A__BSP", "SUBBULAKSHMI_P__AIFB": "SUBBULAKSHMI_P__AIFB", "MUTHUKUMAR_K__DMDK": "MUTHUKUMAR_K__DMDK", "SUBBULAKSHMI_K__IND": "SUBBULAKSHMI_K__IND", "KANAGARAJ_S__SP": "KANAGARAJ_S__SP", "SADHAN_THIRUMALAI_KUMAR_DR_T__MDMK": "SADHAN_THIRUMALAI_KUMAR_DR_T__MDMK", "KRISHNAN_R__CPM": "KRISHNAN_R__CPM", "ANANDAN_D__BSP": "ANANDAN_D__BSP", "PITCHAI_S__DMDK": "PITCHAI_S__DMDK", "BABU_K__AIFB": "BABU_K__AIFB", "SELVAKANI_C__BJP": "SELVAKANI_C__BJP", "CHANDRASEKARAN_K__IND": "CHANDRASEKARAN_K__IND", "PETER_ALPHONSE_S__INC": "PETER_ALPHONSE_S__INC", "KAMALUDEEN_U_H__ADMK": "KAMALUDEEN_U_H__ADMK", "ARUMUGASAMY_M__BSP": "ARUMUGASAMY_M__BSP", "THIRUPPATHY_V_S__IND": "THIRUPPATHY_V_S__IND", "SHANMUGAVELU_M__BJP": "SHANMUGAVELU_M__BJP", "RAJ_SHANMUGARAJ__SP": "RAJ_SHANMUGARAJ__SP", "MAGDOOM__IND": "MAGDOOM__IND", "PANDIAN_P_S__IND": "PANDIAN_P_S__IND", "SENTHIL_RAJ_V__IND": "SENTHIL_RAJ_V__IND", "KARUPPASAMY_PANDIAN_V__DMK": "KARUPPASAMY_PANDIAN_V__DMK", "UDAYASURIYAN_RAMA__MDMK": "UDAYASURIYAN_RAMA__MDMK", "RAVI_ARUNAN_K__BJP": "RAVI_ARUNAN_K__BJP", "KAMARAJ_S__DMDK": "KAMARAJ_S__DMDK", "CHANDRAN_S__BSP": "CHANDRAN_S__BSP", "MARIAPPAN_N__IND": "MARIAPPAN_N__IND", "MUTHURAJA_A__AIFB": "MUTHURAJA_A__AIFB", "BALASUBRAMANIAN_K__IND": "BALASUBRAMANIAN_K__IND", "THANGAPPAN_S_S__IND": "THANGAPPAN_S_S__IND", "RAVICHANDRAN_R__RLD": "RAVICHANDRAN_R__RLD", "ARUMUGASAMY_P__IND": "ARUMUGASAMY_P__IND", "POONGOTHAI_ALADIARUNA__DMK": "POONGOTHAI_ALADIARUNA__DMK", "PANDIARAJ_M__ADMK": "PANDIARAJ_M__ADMK", "SIVAKUMAR_M__BSP": "SIVAKUMAR_M__BSP", "SAMYNATHAN_P__AIFB": "SAMYNATHAN_P__AIFB", "MUTHUKUMARASAMY_DURAI_K__DMDK": "MUTHUKUMARASAMY_DURAI_K__DMDK", "ARULSELVAN_M__BJP": "ARULSELVAN_M__BJP", "MEERAN_A__IND": "MEERAN_A__IND", "MALAI_RAJA_N__DMK": "MALAI_RAJA_N__DMK", "NAINAR_NAGENTHRAN__ADMK": "NAINAR_NAGENTHRAN__ADMK", "JAYACHANDRAN_S__IND": "JAYACHANDRAN_S__IND", "NAMBIRAJAN_S__AIFB": "NAMBIRAJAN_S__AIFB", "SIVAKUMAR_K_M__BJP": "SIVAKUMAR_K_M__BJP", "JEYAKUMAR_A__BSP": "JEYAKUMAR_A__BSP", "RAJI_YADHAV__IND": "RAJI_YADHAV__IND", "RAJAMANICKAM_T__CPI_ML_L": "RAJAMANICKAM_T__CPI_ML_L", "CHELLADURAI_S__SP": "CHELLADURAI_S__SP", "SANKAR_KUMAR_M__IND": "SANKAR_KUMAR_M__IND", "INBARAJ_E__IND": "INBARAJ_E__IND", "MOHIDEEN_KHAN_T_P_M__DMK": "MOHIDEEN_KHAN_T_P_M__DMK", "NIJAMUDEEN_K_M__ADMK": "NIJAMUDEEN_K_M__ADMK", "KALEEL_RAGUMAN_K_A_K_K__DMDK": "KALEEL_RAGUMAN_K_A_K_K__DMDK", "MURUGAN_V__AIFB": "MURUGAN_V__AIFB", "PECHIMUTHU_ARUNACHALASAMY__BJP": "PECHIMUTHU_ARUNACHALASAMY__BJP", "EDWARD_RAJ_M__BSP": "EDWARD_RAJ_M__BSP", "SUBASH_SUNDAR_K__IND": "SUBASH_SUNDAR_K__IND", "JEBAKUMAR_K__IND": "JEBAKUMAR_K__IND", "NARESH_AMBEDKHAR_P__IND": "NARESH_AMBEDKHAR_P__IND", "VEDAMANICKAM_D__IND": "VEDAMANICKAM_D__IND", "NAMASIVAYA_SANKAR_H__IND": "NAMASIVAYA_SANKAR_H__IND", "VARGHESE_AMULRAJ_I__IND": "VARGHESE_AMULRAJ_I__IND", "SUDALAI_MANI_E__RLD": "SUDALAI_MANI_E__RLD", "TANGAVEL_P__IND": "TANGAVEL_P__IND", "GOMATHINAYAGAM_P__IND": "GOMATHINAYAGAM_P__IND", "VELDURAI_P__INC": "VELDURAI_P__INC", "PAUL_MANOJ_PANDIAN_P_H__ADMK": "PAUL_MANOJ_PANDIAN_P_H__ADMK", "RAJENDRANATHAN_S__DMDK": "RAJENDRANATHAN_S__DMDK", "PARAMASIVAN_A__AIFB": "PARAMASIVAN_A__AIFB", "UDAYAKUMAR_S__BSP": "UDAYAKUMAR_S__BSP", "ARUMUGANAINAR_P__BJP": "ARUMUGANAINAR_P__BJP", "ACHUTHAN_R__RLD": "ACHUTHAN_R__RLD", "PAULRATHINAM_A__IND": "PAULRATHINAM_A__IND", "CHARLES_R__IJP": "CHARLES_R__IJP", "AVUDAIYAPPAN_R__DMK": "AVUDAIYAPPAN_R__DMK", "MURUGAIAH_PANDIAN_R__ADMK": "MURUGAIAH_PANDIAN_R__ADMK", "NARAYANAN_A__JD_U": "NARAYANAN_A__JD_U", "PONRAJ_S__DMDK": "PONRAJ_S__DMDK", "VENKATASALAM_M__AIFB": "VENKATASALAM_M__AIFB", "ANBURAJ_SUBRAMANIAN_S_V__BJP": "ANBURAJ_SUBRAMANIAN_S_V__BJP", "GANESAN_E__BSP": "GANESAN_E__BSP", "VELMURUGAN__IND": "VELMURUGAN__IND", "VAITHIYALINGAM_R__IND": "VAITHIYALINGAM_R__IND", "RAMESH_R__IND": "RAMESH_R__IND", "RAVINDRAN_M_V__IND": "RAVINDRAN_M_V__IND", "RAJASINGH__IND": "RAJASINGH__IND", "MARIASINGAM_S__IND": "MARIASINGAM_S__IND", "ATHIMOOLAM_N__IND": "ATHIMOOLAM_N__IND", "VASANTHAKUMAR_H__INC": "VASANTHAKUMAR_H__INC", "SOORIYAKUMAR_S_P__ADMK": "SOORIYAKUMAR_S_P__ADMK", "SANKAR_R__AIFB": "SANKAR_R__AIFB", "PACKIA_RAJ_I__DMDK": "PACKIA_RAJ_I__DMDK", "NAVANEETHAKRISHNAN_A__IND": "NAVANEETHAKRISHNAN_A__IND", "PANDY_U__BSP": "PANDY_U__BSP", "SOLLALAGAN_R_NELLAI__BJP": "SOLLALAGAN_R_NELLAI__BJP", "YOUKENDRAN_K__IND": "YOUKENDRAN_K__IND", "SATHYANARAYANAN_S__IND": "SATHYANARAYANAN_S__IND", "ANANDAKUMAR_S__IJP": "ANANDAKUMAR_S__IJP", "SIVANANAINTHAPERUMALK__IND": "SIVANANAINTHAPERUMALK__IND", "APPAVU_M__DMK": "APPAVU_M__DMK", "GNANAPUNITHA_L__ADMK": "GNANAPUNITHA_L__ADMK", "SELVARAJ_K_P_K__IND": "SELVARAJ_K_P_K__IND", "SIVANAINTHA_PERUMAL_S__DMDK": "SIVANAINTHA_PERUMAL_S__DMDK", "THAMIZHISAI__BJP": "THAMIZHISAI__BJP", "PARVATHI_A__AIFB": "PARVATHI_A__AIFB", "SELVARAJ_A__IND": "SELVARAJ_A__IND", "THANAM_S__IND": "THANAM_S__IND", "THANGASAMY_P__IND": "THANGASAMY_P__IND", "RAJAMANICKAM_P__RLD": "RAJAMANICKAM_P__RLD", "RAJAMANI_S__ABHM": "RAJAMANI_S__ABHM", "SELVAKUMAR_A__IND": "SELVAKUMAR_A__IND", "RANI_VENKATESAN__INC": "RANI_VENKATESAN__INC", "NAZARETH_DURAI_P__MDMK": "NAZARETH_DURAI_P__MDMK", "DIAMOND_RAJA_V__DMDK": "DIAMOND_RAJA_V__DMDK", "MUTHURAMALINGAM_S__AIFB": "MUTHURAMALINGAM_S__AIFB", "SIVA_SUBRAMANIAN_T__BJP": "SIVA_SUBRAMANIAN_T__BJP", "THANGARAJ_M__BSP": "THANGARAJ_M__BSP", "JESUBASKAR_J__IND": "JESUBASKAR_J__IND", "PONPANDI_S__IND": "PONPANDI_S__IND", "MICHEAL_ANTONY_AINROSE_T__IND": "MICHEAL_ANTONY_AINROSE_T__IND", "BALAKRISHNAN_P__IND": "BALAKRISHNAN_P__IND", "SUGUMARAN_P__IND": "SUGUMARAN_P__IND", "ANITHA_R_RADHAKRISHNAN__ADMK": "ANITHA_R_RADHAKRISHNAN__ADMK", "JEYASEELAN_A_D_K__DMK": "JEYASEELAN_A_D_K__DMK", "GANESAN_A__DMDK": "GANESAN_A__DMDK", "VIVEKANTHASEKAR_N__IND": "VIVEKANTHASEKAR_N__IND", "KANNAN_DR_C__BJP": "KANNAN_DR_C__BJP", "PARISAMUTHU_S__AIFB": "PARISAMUTHU_S__AIFB", "KUMAR_V__BSP": "KUMAR_V__BSP", "NADARAJAN_G__IND": "NADARAJAN_G__IND", "CHIDAMBARAM_V__IND": "CHIDAMBARAM_V__IND", "AHAMED_ABDUL_KHADAR_N_M__IND": "AHAMED_ABDUL_KHADAR_N_M__IND", "KALEELRAHUMAN_M__IND": "KALEELRAHUMAN_M__IND", "AYYAKUTTI_K__IND": "AYYAKUTTI_K__IND", "SELVARAJ_D__INC": "SELVARAJ_D__INC", "SHANMUGANATHAN_S_P__ADMK": "SHANMUGANATHAN_S_P__ADMK", "ATHISAYAKUMAR_E__BSP": "ATHISAYAKUMAR_E__BSP", "SATHIYA_SEELAN_C__DMDK": "SATHIYA_SEELAN_C__DMDK", "PAULRAJ_P_M__BJP": "PAULRAJ_P_M__BJP", "FREDERICK_STANLEY_S__AIFB": "FREDERICK_STANLEY_S__AIFB", "GEORGE_BENNI_E__IND": "GEORGE_BENNI_E__IND", "RAJAGOPALAN_N__IND": "RAJAGOPALAN_N__IND", "THANGAPANDY_S__SP": "THANGAPANDY_S__SP", "AYYAPPAN_A__TNJC": "AYYAPPAN_A__TNJC", "KUMAR_G__LJP": "KUMAR_G__LJP", "GEETHA_JEEVAN_P__DMK": "GEETHA_JEEVAN_P__DMK", "DANIELRAJ_S__ADMK": "DANIELRAJ_S__ADMK", "PETERRAJ_G_V__DMDK": "PETERRAJ_G_V__DMDK", "SIVAMURUGAN_T__BJP": "SIVAMURUGAN_T__BJP", "KASIPANDIAN_T__BSP": "KASIPANDIAN_T__BSP", "SARAVANAMUTHU_M__AIFB": "SARAVANAMUTHU_M__AIFB", "RAMKUMAR_V__IND": "RAMKUMAR_V__IND", "MURUGAN_A__IND": "MURUGAN_A__IND", "NAGARAJAN_V__JD_U": "NAGARAJAN_V__JD_U", "SANKARALINGAM_P__IND": "SANKARALINGAM_P__IND", "JEYAMAL_ARPUTHARAJ_B__RLD": "JEYAMAL_ARPUTHARAJ_B__RLD", "ARUMUGANAINAR_A__IND": "ARUMUGANAINAR_A__IND", "BOMBAIDASAN_J__IJP": "BOMBAIDASAN_J__IJP", "GNANADURAI_S__IND": "GNANADURAI_S__IND", "SURESH_RAJAN_N__DMK": "SURESH_RAJAN_N__DMK", "THALAVAI_SUNDARAM_N__ADMK": "THALAVAI_SUNDARAM_N__ADMK", "ALEX_SHANTHA_SEKAR_A__DMDK": "ALEX_SHANTHA_SEKAR_A__DMDK", "THANU_KRISHNAN_N__BJP": "THANU_KRISHNAN_N__BJP", "RAJAN_K__IND": "RAJAN_K__IND", "SUBRAMANIAPILLAI_S__IND": "SUBRAMANIAPILLAI_S__IND", "UTHAMAN_T__AIFB": "UTHAMAN_T__AIFB", "KUMARASWAMY_S__IND": "KUMARASWAMY_S__IND", "VETRI_VELAYUTHA_PERUMAL_P__ABHM": "VETRI_VELAYUTHA_PERUMAL_P__ABHM", "KUMARISWAMY_NADAR_S__IND": "KUMARISWAMY_NADAR_S__IND", "RAJAN_A__DMK": "RAJAN_A__DMK", "AUSTIN_S__IVP": "AUSTIN_S__IVP", "RETHINARAJ_S__MDMK": "RETHINARAJ_S__MDMK", "UDHAYA_KUMAR_T__BJP": "UDHAYA_KUMAR_T__BJP", "BABU_M__IND": "BABU_M__IND", "LION_RAJAN_A_V_M__DMDK": "LION_RAJAN_A_V_M__DMDK", "MADHUSOOTHANA_PERUMAL_P__ABHM": "MADHUSOOTHANA_PERUMAL_P__ABHM", "RAMESH_P__IND": "RAMESH_P__IND", "NAHOOR_MEERAN_BEER_MOHAMMED_U__IND": "NAHOOR_MEERAN_BEER_MOHAMMED_U__IND", "MANIKANDAN_P__IND": "MANIKANDAN_P__IND", "JEYASEELAN_K_J__LJP": "JEYASEELAN_K_J__LJP", "SURESH_J__IND": "SURESH_J__IND", "CHITAMBARAPILLAI_P__IND": "CHITAMBARAPILLAI_P__IND", "ANNADHURAI_P__IND": "ANNADHURAI_P__IND", "ELANCHELIAN_R__IND": "ELANCHELIAN_R__IND", "JEYAPAUL_S__INC": "JEYAPAUL_S__INC", "GANDHI_M_R__BJP": "GANDHI_M_R__BJP", "PATCHAIMAL_K_T__ADMK": "PATCHAIMAL_K_T__ADMK", "WELLINGTON_S__DMDK": "WELLINGTON_S__DMDK", "LINGA_PERUMAL_C__IND": "LINGA_PERUMAL_C__IND", "SURENDRAN_NAIR_K__ABHM": "SURENDRAN_NAIR_K__ABHM", "DHARMENDRA_KUMAR_S_N__BSP": "DHARMENDRA_KUMAR_S_N__BSP", "THOMAS_S__IND": "THOMAS_S__IND", "KUMARASWAMY_H__IND": "KUMARASWAMY_H__IND", "KARUNAKARAN__IND": "KARUNAKARAN__IND", "BALAKRISHNAN_C__IND": "BALAKRISHNAN_C__IND", "THEODARE_REGINALD_T__DMK": "THEODARE_REGINALD_T__DMK", "RAJENDRA_PRASAD_K_P__ADMK": "RAJENDRA_PRASAD_K_P__ADMK", "VELAYUTHAM_C__BJP": "VELAYUTHAM_C__BJP", "SELVIN_C__DMDK": "SELVIN_C__DMDK", "LAL_BENSAM_Y__IND": "LAL_BENSAM_Y__IND", "KUMARASWAMY_V__BSP": "KUMARASWAMY_V__BSP", "ANTONY_M__IND": "ANTONY_M__IND", "MURUGESAN_C__IND": "MURUGESAN_C__IND", "LEEMA_ROSE_R__CPM": "LEEMA_ROSE_R__CPM", "SUJITH_KUMAR_G__BJP": "SUJITH_KUMAR_G__BJP", "THILAK_KUMAR_P_C_N__ADMK": "THILAK_KUMAR_P_C_N__ADMK", "JEGANATHAN_D__DMDK": "JEGANATHAN_D__DMDK", "MONI_N_S__IND": "MONI_N_S__IND", "MEENA_R__BSP": "MEENA_R__BSP", "JOHN_JOSEPH_G__CPM": "JOHN_JOSEPH_G__CPM", "FRANKLIN_F__ADMK": "FRANKLIN_F__ADMK", "VIJAYA_RAGHAVAN_PON__NCP": "VIJAYA_RAGHAVAN_PON__NCP", "DEVADHAS_L__BJP": "DEVADHAS_L__BJP", "IDAN_SONY_L__DMDK": "IDAN_SONY_L__DMDK", "GEORGE_E__IND": "GEORGE_E__IND", "RAJADHASAN_Y__BSP": "RAJADHASAN_Y__BSP", "VEL_KUMAR_P_S__ABHM": "VEL_KUMAR_P_S__ABHM", "PRABHAKARAN_K__IND": "PRABHAKARAN_K__IND", "GNANAMUTHAN_V__IND": "GNANAMUTHAN_V__IND", "JOHN_JACOB_S__INC": "JOHN_JACOB_S__INC", "CHANDRA_KUMAR_T__BJP": "CHANDRA_KUMAR_T__BJP", "KUMARADHAS_D__ADMK": "KUMARADHAS_D__ADMK", "RICHMOHANRAJ_A__DMDK": "RICHMOHANRAJ_A__DMDK", "STANLEY_GIPIRAJ_T__IND": "STANLEY_GIPIRAJ_T__IND", "REHU_ANANDHARAJ_A__IND": "REHU_ANANDHARAJ_A__IND", "JUSTIN_FELIX_A__IND": "JUSTIN_FELIX_A__IND", "SURESH_C__IND": "SURESH_C__IND"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 234, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 234, "registered_not_positive": 234}, "n_stations_flagged": 234, "created_at": "2026-07-11T22:47:44.098623", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.768, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.854, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.721, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.569, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.111, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 234}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "500aa280d57c4db8bbd2caeaf4c2cde9", "name": "India 2006 local (overnight india_west_bengal_2006_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2006, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/West_Bengal/West_Bengal_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AIFB": "AIFB", "AITC": "AITC", "AMB": "AMB", "BJP": "BJP", "BSP": "BSP", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI(M)(L)": "CPI(M)(L)", "CPI(ML)": "CPI(ML)", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "CPM": "CPM", "DSP(P)": "DSP(P)", "GNLF": "GNLF", "IJP": "IJP", "INC": "INC", "IPFB": "IPFB", "Independent_ALIPORE_1": "Independent_ALIPORE_1", "Independent_ALIPORE_2": "Independent_ALIPORE_2", "Independent_ALIPORE_3": "Independent_ALIPORE_3", "Independent_ALIPORE_4": "Independent_ALIPORE_4", "Independent_ALIPORE_5": "Independent_ALIPORE_5", "Independent_ALIPORE_6": "Independent_ALIPORE_6", "Independent_ALIPURDUARS_1": "Independent_ALIPURDUARS_1", "Independent_ALIPURDUARS_2": "Independent_ALIPURDUARS_2", "Independent_ALIPURDUARS_3": "Independent_ALIPURDUARS_3", "Independent_AMDANGA_1": "Independent_AMDANGA_1", "Independent_AMTA_1": "Independent_AMTA_1", "Independent_AMTA_2": "Independent_AMTA_2", "Independent_AMTA_3": "Independent_AMTA_3", "Independent_AMTA_4": "Independent_AMTA_4", "Independent_AMTA_5": "Independent_AMTA_5", "Independent_ARSA_1": "Independent_ARSA_1", "Independent_ARSA_2": "Independent_ARSA_2", "Independent_ARSA_3": "Independent_ARSA_3", "Independent_ARSA_4": "Independent_ARSA_4", "Independent_ASHOKENAGAR_1": "Independent_ASHOKENAGAR_1", "Independent_ASHOKENAGAR_2": "Independent_ASHOKENAGAR_2", "Independent_AURANGABAD_1": "Independent_AURANGABAD_1", "Independent_AURANGABAD_2": "Independent_AURANGABAD_2", "Independent_AURANGABAD_3": "Independent_AURANGABAD_3", "Independent_AUSGRAM_1": "Independent_AUSGRAM_1", "Independent_AUSGRAM_2": "Independent_AUSGRAM_2", "Independent_AUSGRAM_3": "Independent_AUSGRAM_3", "Independent_BAGNAN_1": "Independent_BAGNAN_1", "Independent_BAGNAN_2": "Independent_BAGNAN_2", "Independent_BAGNAN_3": "Independent_BAGNAN_3", "Independent_BALAGARH_1": "Independent_BALAGARH_1", "Independent_BALLYGUNGE_1": "Independent_BALLYGUNGE_1", "Independent_BALLYGUNGE_2": "Independent_BALLYGUNGE_2", "Independent_BALLYGUNGE_3": "Independent_BALLYGUNGE_3", "Independent_BALLYGUNGE_4": "Independent_BALLYGUNGE_4", "Independent_BALLYGUNGE_5": "Independent_BALLYGUNGE_5", "Independent_BALLY_1": "Independent_BALLY_1", "Independent_BALLY_2": "Independent_BALLY_2", "Independent_BALLY_3": "Independent_BALLY_3", "Independent_BALLY_4": "Independent_BALLY_4", "Independent_BALURGHAT_1": "Independent_BALURGHAT_1", "Independent_BANDUAN_1": "Independent_BANDUAN_1", "Independent_BANDUAN_2": "Independent_BANDUAN_2", "Independent_BANDUAN_3": "Independent_BANDUAN_3", "Independent_BANKURA_1": "Independent_BANKURA_1", "Independent_BANSBERIA_1": "Independent_BANSBERIA_1", "Independent_BARABANI_1": "Independent_BARABANI_1", "Independent_BARANAGAR_1": "Independent_BARANAGAR_1", "Independent_BARANAGAR_2": "Independent_BARANAGAR_2", "Independent_BARANAGAR_3": "Independent_BARANAGAR_3", "Independent_BARASAT_1": "Independent_BARASAT_1", "Independent_BARA_BAZAR_1": "Independent_BARA_BAZAR_1", "Independent_BARA_BAZAR_2": "Independent_BARA_BAZAR_2", "Independent_BARA_BAZAR_3": "Independent_BARA_BAZAR_3", "Independent_BARA_BAZAR_4": "Independent_BARA_BAZAR_4", "Independent_BARA_BAZAR_5": "Independent_BARA_BAZAR_5", "Independent_BARA_BAZAR_6": "Independent_BARA_BAZAR_6", "Independent_BARA_BAZAR_7": "Independent_BARA_BAZAR_7", "Independent_BARA_BAZAR_8": "Independent_BARA_BAZAR_8", "Independent_BARA_BAZAR_9": "Independent_BARA_BAZAR_9", "Independent_BARJORA_1": "Independent_BARJORA_1", "Independent_BARJORA_2": "Independent_BARJORA_2", "Independent_BARUIPUR_1": "Independent_BARUIPUR_1", "Independent_BARUIPUR_2": "Independent_BARUIPUR_2", "Independent_BARUIPUR_3": "Independent_BARUIPUR_3", "Independent_BARUIPUR_4": "Independent_BARUIPUR_4", "Independent_BARWAN_1": "Independent_BARWAN_1", "Independent_BARWAN_2": "Independent_BARWAN_2", "Independent_BASIRHAT_1": "Independent_BASIRHAT_1", "Independent_BEHALA_EAST_1": "Independent_BEHALA_EAST_1", "Independent_BEHALA_EAST_2": "Independent_BEHALA_EAST_2", "Independent_BEHALA_EAST_3": "Independent_BEHALA_EAST_3", "Independent_BEHALA_EAST_4": "Independent_BEHALA_EAST_4", "Independent_BEHALA_WEST_1": "Independent_BEHALA_WEST_1", "Independent_BEHALA_WEST_2": "Independent_BEHALA_WEST_2", "Independent_BEHALA_WEST_3": "Independent_BEHALA_WEST_3", "Independent_BELDANGA_1": "Independent_BELDANGA_1", "Independent_BELDANGA_2": "Independent_BELDANGA_2", "Independent_BELDANGA_3": "Independent_BELDANGA_3", "Independent_BELGACHIA_EAST_1": "Independent_BELGACHIA_EAST_1", "Independent_BELGACHIA_EAST_2": "Independent_BELGACHIA_EAST_2", "Independent_BELGACHIA_EAST_3": "Independent_BELGACHIA_EAST_3", "Independent_BELGACHIA_WEST_1": "Independent_BELGACHIA_WEST_1", "Independent_BELGACHIA_WEST_2": "Independent_BELGACHIA_WEST_2", "Independent_BELIAGHATA_1": "Independent_BELIAGHATA_1", "Independent_BELIAGHATA_2": "Independent_BELIAGHATA_2", "Independent_BELIAGHATA_3": "Independent_BELIAGHATA_3", "Independent_BERHAMPORE_1": "Independent_BERHAMPORE_1", "Independent_BERHAMPORE_2": "Independent_BERHAMPORE_2", "Independent_BERHAMPORE_3": "Independent_BERHAMPORE_3", "Independent_BERHAMPORE_4": "Independent_BERHAMPORE_4", "Independent_BHAGABANGOLA_1": "Independent_BHAGABANGOLA_1", "Independent_BHAGABANPUR_1": "Independent_BHAGABANPUR_1", "Independent_BHAGABANPUR_2": "Independent_BHAGABANPUR_2", "Independent_BHANGAR_1": "Independent_BHANGAR_1", "Independent_BHARATPUR_1": "Independent_BHARATPUR_1", "Independent_BHARATPUR_2": "Independent_BHARATPUR_2", "Independent_BHATAR_1": "Independent_BHATAR_1", "Independent_BHATPARA_1": "Independent_BHATPARA_1", "Independent_BHATPARA_2": "Independent_BHATPARA_2", "Independent_BHATPARA_3": "Independent_BHATPARA_3", "Independent_BHATPARA_4": "Independent_BHATPARA_4", "Independent_BHATPARA_5": "Independent_BHATPARA_5", "Independent_BHATPARA_6": "Independent_BHATPARA_6", "Independent_BHATPARA_7": "Independent_BHATPARA_7", "Independent_BIJPUR_1": "Independent_BIJPUR_1", "Independent_BIJPUR_2": "Independent_BIJPUR_2", "Independent_BINPUR_1": "Independent_BINPUR_1", "Independent_BISHNUPUR_WEST_1": "Independent_BISHNUPUR_WEST_1", "Independent_BISHNUPUR_WEST_2": "Independent_BISHNUPUR_WEST_2", "Independent_BOLPUR_1": "Independent_BOLPUR_1", "Independent_BOLPUR_2": "Independent_BOLPUR_2", "Independent_BOLPUR_3": "Independent_BOLPUR_3", "Independent_BONGAON_1": "Independent_BONGAON_1", "Independent_BOW_BAZAR_1": "Independent_BOW_BAZAR_1", "Independent_BOW_BAZAR_2": "Independent_BOW_BAZAR_2", "Independent_BOW_BAZAR_3": "Independent_BOW_BAZAR_3", "Independent_BOW_BAZAR_4": "Independent_BOW_BAZAR_4", "Independent_BOW_BAZAR_5": "Independent_BOW_BAZAR_5", "Independent_BOW_BAZAR_6": "Independent_BOW_BAZAR_6", "Independent_BOW_BAZAR_7": "Independent_BOW_BAZAR_7", "Independent_BUDGE_BUDGE_1": "Independent_BUDGE_BUDGE_1", "Independent_BUDGE_BUDGE_2": "Independent_BUDGE_BUDGE_2", "Independent_BURTOLA_1": "Independent_BURTOLA_1", "Independent_BURTOLA_2": "Independent_BURTOLA_2", "Independent_BURTOLA_3": "Independent_BURTOLA_3", "Independent_BURTOLA_4": "Independent_BURTOLA_4", "Independent_BURTOLA_5": "Independent_BURTOLA_5", "Independent_BURTOLA_6": "Independent_BURTOLA_6", "Independent_BURTOLA_7": "Independent_BURTOLA_7", "Independent_BURTOLA_8": "Independent_BURTOLA_8", "Independent_CANNING_WEST_1": "Independent_CANNING_WEST_1", "Independent_CANNING_WEST_2": "Independent_CANNING_WEST_2", "Independent_CHAKDAHA_1": "Independent_CHAKDAHA_1", "Independent_CHAMPDANI_1": "Independent_CHAMPDANI_1", "Independent_CHANDERNAGORE_1": "Independent_CHANDERNAGORE_1", "Independent_CHANDRAKONA_1": "Independent_CHANDRAKONA_1", "Independent_CHAPRA_1": "Independent_CHAPRA_1", "Independent_CHHATNA_1": "Independent_CHHATNA_1", "Independent_CHHATNA_2": "Independent_CHHATNA_2", "Independent_CHINSURAH_1": "Independent_CHINSURAH_1", "Independent_CHINSURAH_2": "Independent_CHINSURAH_2", "Independent_CHOWRINGHEE_1": "Independent_CHOWRINGHEE_1", "Independent_CHOWRINGHEE_2": "Independent_CHOWRINGHEE_2", "Independent_CHOWRINGHEE_3": "Independent_CHOWRINGHEE_3", "Independent_CHOWRINGHEE_4": "Independent_CHOWRINGHEE_4", "Independent_CHOWRINGHEE_5": "Independent_CHOWRINGHEE_5", "Independent_CONTAI_NORTH_1": "Independent_CONTAI_NORTH_1", "Independent_CONTAI_SOUTH_1": "Independent_CONTAI_SOUTH_1", "Independent_CONTAI_SOUTH_2": "Independent_CONTAI_SOUTH_2", "Independent_COOCH_BEHAR_NORTH_1": "Independent_COOCH_BEHAR_NORTH_1", "Independent_COOCH_BEHAR_WEST_1": "Independent_COOCH_BEHAR_WEST_1", "Independent_COOCH_BEHAR_WEST_2": "Independent_COOCH_BEHAR_WEST_2", "Independent_COSSIPUR_1": "Independent_COSSIPUR_1", "Independent_COSSIPUR_2": "Independent_COSSIPUR_2", "Independent_COSSIPUR_3": "Independent_COSSIPUR_3", "Independent_COSSIPUR_4": "Independent_COSSIPUR_4", "Independent_COSSIPUR_5": "Independent_COSSIPUR_5", "Independent_COSSIPUR_6": "Independent_COSSIPUR_6", "Independent_DARJEELING_1": "Independent_DARJEELING_1", "Independent_DHAKURIA_1": "Independent_DHAKURIA_1", "Independent_DHAKURIA_2": "Independent_DHAKURIA_2", "Independent_DHAKURIA_3": "Independent_DHAKURIA_3", "Independent_DHUPGURI_1": "Independent_DHUPGURI_1", "Independent_DHUPGURI_2": "Independent_DHUPGURI_2", "Independent_DHUPGURI_3": "Independent_DHUPGURI_3", "Independent_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_1": "Independent_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_1", "Independent_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_2": "Independent_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_2", "Independent_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_3": "Independent_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_3", "Independent_DINHATA_1": "Independent_DINHATA_1", "Independent_DINHATA_2": "Independent_DINHATA_2", "Independent_DOMJUR_1": "Independent_DOMJUR_1", "Independent_DOMJUR_2": "Independent_DOMJUR_2", "Independent_DOMJUR_3": "Independent_DOMJUR_3", "Independent_DOMJUR_4": "Independent_DOMJUR_4", "Independent_DOMJUR_5": "Independent_DOMJUR_5", "Independent_DOMKAL_1": "Independent_DOMKAL_1", "Independent_DUBRAJPUR_1": "Independent_DUBRAJPUR_1", "Independent_DUM_DUM_1": "Independent_DUM_DUM_1", "Independent_DURGAPUR_II_1": "Independent_DURGAPUR_II_1", "Independent_DURGAPUR_I_1": "Independent_DURGAPUR_I_1", "Independent_EGRA_1": "Independent_EGRA_1", "Independent_ENGLISHBAZAR_1": "Independent_ENGLISHBAZAR_1", "Independent_ENTALLY_1": "Independent_ENTALLY_1", "Independent_ENTALLY_2": "Independent_ENTALLY_2", "Independent_ENTALLY_3": "Independent_ENTALLY_3", "Independent_FALAKATA_1": "Independent_FALAKATA_1", "Independent_FALAKATA_2": "Independent_FALAKATA_2", "Independent_FARAKKA_1": "Independent_FARAKKA_1", "Independent_GAIGHATA_1": "Independent_GAIGHATA_1", "Independent_GAIGHATA_2": "Independent_GAIGHATA_2", "Independent_GAIGHATA_3": "Independent_GAIGHATA_3", "Independent_GAJOL_1": "Independent_GAJOL_1", "Independent_GAJOL_2": "Independent_GAJOL_2", "Independent_GAJOL_3": "Independent_GAJOL_3", "Independent_GALSI_1": "Independent_GALSI_1", "Independent_GANGARAMPUR_1": "Independent_GANGARAMPUR_1", "Independent_GANGARAMPUR_2": "Independent_GANGARAMPUR_2", "Independent_GARDEN_REACH_1": "Independent_GARDEN_REACH_1", "Independent_GARHBETA_WEST_1": "Independent_GARHBETA_WEST_1", "Independent_GARHBETA_WEST_2": "Independent_GARHBETA_WEST_2", "Independent_GHATAL_1": "Independent_GHATAL_1", "Independent_GOALPOKHAR_1": "Independent_GOALPOKHAR_1", "Independent_GOALPOKHAR_2": "Independent_GOALPOKHAR_2", "Independent_GOPIBALLAVPUR_1": "Independent_GOPIBALLAVPUR_1", "Independent_GOSABA_1": "Independent_GOSABA_1", "Independent_GOSABA_2": "Independent_GOSABA_2", "Independent_HABIBPUR_1": "Independent_HABIBPUR_1", "Independent_HABIBPUR_2": "Independent_HABIBPUR_2", "Independent_HABIBPUR_3": "Independent_HABIBPUR_3", "Independent_HABIBPUR_4": "Independent_HABIBPUR_4", "Independent_HABRA_1": "Independent_HABRA_1", "Independent_HANSAN_1": "Independent_HANSAN_1", "Independent_HANSKHALI_1": "Independent_HANSKHALI_1", "Independent_HANSKHALI_2": "Independent_HANSKHALI_2", "Independent_HARIHARPARA_1": "Independent_HARIHARPARA_1", "Independent_HARIHARPARA_2": "Independent_HARIHARPARA_2", "Independent_HARIHARPARA_3": "Independent_HARIHARPARA_3", "Independent_HARINGHATA_1": "Independent_HARINGHATA_1", "Independent_HARINGHATA_2": "Independent_HARINGHATA_2", "Independent_HARIPAL_1": "Independent_HARIPAL_1", "Independent_HARISHCHANDRAPUR_1": "Independent_HARISHCHANDRAPUR_1", "Independent_HARISHCHANDRAPUR_2": "Independent_HARISHCHANDRAPUR_2", "Independent_HASNABAD_1": "Independent_HASNABAD_1", "Independent_HASNABAD_2": "Independent_HASNABAD_2", "Independent_HASNABAD_3": "Independent_HASNABAD_3", "Independent_HASNABAD_4": "Independent_HASNABAD_4", "Independent_HINGALGANJ_1": "Independent_HINGALGANJ_1", "Independent_HIRAPUR_1": "Independent_HIRAPUR_1", "Independent_HOWRAH_CENTRAL_1": "Independent_HOWRAH_CENTRAL_1", "Independent_HOWRAH_CENTRAL_2": "Independent_HOWRAH_CENTRAL_2", "Independent_HOWRAH_CENTRAL_3": "Independent_HOWRAH_CENTRAL_3", "Independent_HOWRAH_NORTH_1": "Independent_HOWRAH_NORTH_1", "Independent_HOWRAH_NORTH_2": "Independent_HOWRAH_NORTH_2", "Independent_HOWRAH_NORTH_3": "Independent_HOWRAH_NORTH_3", "Independent_HOWRAH_NORTH_4": "Independent_HOWRAH_NORTH_4", "Independent_HOWRAH_NORTH_5": "Independent_HOWRAH_NORTH_5", "Independent_HOWRAH_SOUTH_1": "Independent_HOWRAH_SOUTH_1", "Independent_HOWRAH_SOUTH_2": "Independent_HOWRAH_SOUTH_2", "Independent_HOWRAH_SOUTH_3": "Independent_HOWRAH_SOUTH_3", "Independent_HURA_1": "Independent_HURA_1", "Independent_HURA_2": "Independent_HURA_2", "Independent_INDPUR_1": "Independent_INDPUR_1", "Independent_ITAHAR_1": "Independent_ITAHAR_1", "Independent_ITAHAR_2": "Independent_ITAHAR_2", "Independent_JADAVPUR_1": "Independent_JADAVPUR_1", "Independent_JAGATBALLAVPUR_1": "Independent_JAGATBALLAVPUR_1", "Independent_JAGATBALLAVPUR_2": "Independent_JAGATBALLAVPUR_2", "Independent_JAGATBALLAVPUR_3": "Independent_JAGATBALLAVPUR_3", "Independent_JAGATDAL_1": "Independent_JAGATDAL_1", "Independent_JAGATDAL_2": "Independent_JAGATDAL_2", "Independent_JAGATDAL_3": "Independent_JAGATDAL_3", "Independent_JAIPUR_1": "Independent_JAIPUR_1", "Independent_JAIPUR_2": "Independent_JAIPUR_2", "Independent_JAIPUR_3": "Independent_JAIPUR_3", "Independent_JAIPUR_4": "Independent_JAIPUR_4", "Independent_JAIPUR_5": "Independent_JAIPUR_5", "Independent_JALANGI_1": "Independent_JALANGI_1", "Independent_JALANGI_2": "Independent_JALANGI_2", "Independent_JALPAIGURI_1": "Independent_JALPAIGURI_1", "Independent_JALPAIGURI_2": "Independent_JALPAIGURI_2", "Independent_JALPAIGURI_3": "Independent_JALPAIGURI_3", "Independent_JAMALPUR_1": "Independent_JAMALPUR_1", "Independent_JAMURIA_1": "Independent_JAMURIA_1", "Independent_JANGIPUR_1": "Independent_JANGIPUR_1", "Independent_JANGIPUR_2": "Independent_JANGIPUR_2", "Independent_JANGIPUR_3": "Independent_JANGIPUR_3", "Independent_JHALDA_1": "Independent_JHALDA_1", "Independent_JHALDA_2": "Independent_JHALDA_2", "Independent_JHARGRAM_1": "Independent_JHARGRAM_1", "Independent_JORABAGAN_1": "Independent_JORABAGAN_1", "Independent_JORABAGAN_2": "Independent_JORABAGAN_2", "Independent_JORABAGAN_3": "Independent_JORABAGAN_3", "Independent_JORABAGAN_4": "Independent_JORABAGAN_4", "Independent_JORABAGAN_5": "Independent_JORABAGAN_5", "Independent_JORABAGAN_6": "Independent_JORABAGAN_6", "Independent_JORABAGAN_7": "Independent_JORABAGAN_7", "Independent_JORASANKO_1": "Independent_JORASANKO_1", "Independent_JORASANKO_2": "Independent_JORASANKO_2", "Independent_JORASANKO_3": "Independent_JORASANKO_3", "Independent_JORASANKO_4": "Independent_JORASANKO_4", "Independent_JORASANKO_5": "Independent_JORASANKO_5", "Independent_JORASANKO_6": "Independent_JORASANKO_6", "Independent_JORASANKO_7": "Independent_JORASANKO_7", "Independent_JORASANKO_8": "Independent_JORASANKO_8", "Independent_JOYNAGAR_1": "Independent_JOYNAGAR_1", "Independent_KABITIRTHA_1": "Independent_KABITIRTHA_1", "Independent_KABITIRTHA_2": "Independent_KABITIRTHA_2", "Independent_KABITIRTHA_3": "Independent_KABITIRTHA_3", "Independent_KABITIRTHA_4": "Independent_KABITIRTHA_4", "Independent_KABITIRTHA_5": "Independent_KABITIRTHA_5", "Independent_KABITIRTHA_6": "Independent_KABITIRTHA_6", "Independent_KABITIRTHA_7": "Independent_KABITIRTHA_7", "Independent_KABITIRTHA_8": "Independent_KABITIRTHA_8", "Independent_KAKDWIP_1": "Independent_KAKDWIP_1", "Independent_KALCHINI_1": "Independent_KALCHINI_1", "Independent_KALCHINI_2": "Independent_KALCHINI_2", "Independent_KALCHINI_3": "Independent_KALCHINI_3", "Independent_KALIACHAK_1": "Independent_KALIACHAK_1", "Independent_KALIAGANJ_1": "Independent_KALIAGANJ_1", "Independent_KALIAGANJ_2": "Independent_KALIAGANJ_2", "Independent_KALIGANJ_1": "Independent_KALIGANJ_1", "Independent_KALIMPONG_1": "Independent_KALIMPONG_1", "Independent_KALIMPONG_2": "Independent_KALIMPONG_2", "Independent_KALYANPUR_1": "Independent_KALYANPUR_1", "Independent_KAMARHATI_1": "Independent_KAMARHATI_1", "Independent_KANDI_1": "Independent_KANDI_1", "Independent_KANDI_2": "Independent_KANDI_2", "Independent_KANDI_3": "Independent_KANDI_3", "Independent_KANDI_4": "Independent_KANDI_4", "Independent_KANDI_5": "Independent_KANDI_5", "Independent_KANDI_6": "Independent_KANDI_6", "Independent_KANKSA_1": "Independent_KANKSA_1", "Independent_KARANDIGHI_1": "Independent_KARANDIGHI_1", "Independent_KARANDIGHI_2": "Independent_KARANDIGHI_2", "Independent_KARANDIGHI_3": "Independent_KARANDIGHI_3", "Independent_KARIMPUR_1": "Independent_KARIMPUR_1", "Independent_KASHIPUR_1": "Independent_KASHIPUR_1", "Independent_KASHIPUR_2": "Independent_KASHIPUR_2", "Independent_KATWA_1": "Independent_KATWA_1", "Independent_KESHIARI_1": "Independent_KESHIARI_1", "Independent_KHAJURI_1": "Independent_KHAJURI_1", "Independent_KHARAGPUR_RURAL_1": "Independent_KHARAGPUR_RURAL_1", "Independent_KHARAGPUR_TOWN_1": "Independent_KHARAGPUR_TOWN_1", "Independent_KHARDAH_1": "Independent_KHARDAH_1", "Independent_KRANTI_1": "Independent_KRANTI_1", "Independent_KRANTI_2": "Independent_KRANTI_2", "Independent_KRISHNAGANJ_1": "Independent_KRISHNAGANJ_1", "Independent_KRISHNAGAR_EAST_1": "Independent_KRISHNAGAR_EAST_1", "Independent_KRISHNAGAR_WEST_1": "Independent_KRISHNAGAR_WEST_1", "Independent_KULPI_1": "Independent_KULPI_1", "Independent_KULTALI_1": "Independent_KULTALI_1", "Independent_KULTI_1": "Independent_KULTI_1", "Independent_KULTI_2": "Independent_KULTI_2", "Independent_KUMARGANJ_1": "Independent_KUMARGANJ_1", "Independent_KUMARGANJ_2": "Independent_KUMARGANJ_2", "Independent_KURSEONG_1": "Independent_KURSEONG_1", "Independent_KUSHMANDI_1": "Independent_KUSHMANDI_1", "Independent_KUSHMANDI_2": "Independent_KUSHMANDI_2", "Independent_KUSHMANDI_3": "Independent_KUSHMANDI_3", "Independent_LABHPUR_1": "Independent_LABHPUR_1", "Independent_LALGOLA_1": "Independent_LALGOLA_1", "Independent_MADARIHAT_1": "Independent_MADARIHAT_1", "Independent_MADARIHAT_2": "Independent_MADARIHAT_2", "Independent_MADARIHAT_3": "Independent_MADARIHAT_3", "Independent_MAGRAHAT_EAST_1": "Independent_MAGRAHAT_EAST_1", "Independent_MAGRAHAT_WEST_1": "Independent_MAGRAHAT_WEST_1", "Independent_MAGRAHAT_WEST_2": "Independent_MAGRAHAT_WEST_2", "Independent_MAHAMMAD_BAZAR_1": "Independent_MAHAMMAD_BAZAR_1", "Independent_MAHISHADAL_1": "Independent_MAHISHADAL_1", "Independent_MAINAGURI_1": "Independent_MAINAGURI_1", "Independent_MAINAGURI_2": "Independent_MAINAGURI_2", "Independent_MAINAGURI_3": "Independent_MAINAGURI_3", "Independent_MALDA_1": "Independent_MALDA_1", "Independent_MALDA_2": "Independent_MALDA_2", "Independent_MAL_1": "Independent_MAL_1", "Independent_MANBAZAR_1": "Independent_MANBAZAR_1", "Independent_MANDIRBAZAR_1": "Independent_MANDIRBAZAR_1", "Independent_MANGALKOT_1": "Independent_MANGALKOT_1", "Independent_MANICKTOLA_1": "Independent_MANICKTOLA_1", "Independent_MANICKTOLA_2": "Independent_MANICKTOLA_2", "Independent_MANICKTOLA_3": "Independent_MANICKTOLA_3", "Independent_MANIKCHAK_1": "Independent_MANIKCHAK_1", "Independent_MANIKCHAK_2": "Independent_MANIKCHAK_2", "Independent_MATHABHANGA_1": "Independent_MATHABHANGA_1", "Independent_MATHABHANGA_2": "Independent_MATHABHANGA_2", "Independent_MATHABHANGA_3": "Independent_MATHABHANGA_3", "Independent_MATHURAPUR_1": "Independent_MATHURAPUR_1", "Independent_MATHURAPUR_2": "Independent_MATHURAPUR_2", "Independent_MATHURAPUR_3": "Independent_MATHURAPUR_3", "Independent_MAYURESWAR_1": "Independent_MAYURESWAR_1", "Independent_MEKLIGANJ_1": "Independent_MEKLIGANJ_1", "Independent_MEKLIGANJ_2": "Independent_MEKLIGANJ_2", "Independent_MEKLIGANJ_3": "Independent_MEKLIGANJ_3", "Independent_MIDNAPORE_1": "Independent_MIDNAPORE_1", "Independent_MIDNAPORE_2": "Independent_MIDNAPORE_2", "Independent_MOYNA_1": "Independent_MOYNA_1", "Independent_MOYNA_2": "Independent_MOYNA_2", "Independent_MURARAI_1": "Independent_MURARAI_1", "Independent_MURSHIDABAD_1": "Independent_MURSHIDABAD_1", "Independent_MURSHIDABAD_2": "Independent_MURSHIDABAD_2", "Independent_NABAGRAM_1": "Independent_NABAGRAM_1", "Independent_NABAGRAM_2": "Independent_NABAGRAM_2", "Independent_NABAGRAM_3": "Independent_NABAGRAM_3", "Independent_NABAGRAM_4": "Independent_NABAGRAM_4", "Independent_NADANGHAT_1": "Independent_NADANGHAT_1", "Independent_NAGRAKATA_1": "Independent_NAGRAKATA_1", "Independent_NAIHATI_1": "Independent_NAIHATI_1", "Independent_NAIHATI_2": "Independent_NAIHATI_2", "Independent_NAKASHIPARA_1": "Independent_NAKASHIPARA_1", "Independent_NALHATI_1": "Independent_NALHATI_1", "Independent_NANDANPUR_1": "Independent_NANDANPUR_1", "Independent_NANDIGRAM_1": "Independent_NANDIGRAM_1", "Independent_NANDIGRAM_2": "Independent_NANDIGRAM_2", "Independent_NAODA_1": "Independent_NAODA_1", "Independent_NAODA_2": "Independent_NAODA_2", "Independent_NARAYANGARH_1": "Independent_NARAYANGARH_1", "Independent_NATABARI_1": "Independent_NATABARI_1", "Independent_NAYAGRAM_1": "Independent_NAYAGRAM_1", "Independent_ONDA_1": "Independent_ONDA_1", "Independent_PALASHIPARA_1": "Independent_PALASHIPARA_1", "Independent_PALASHIPARA_2": "Independent_PALASHIPARA_2", "Independent_PANSKURA_EAST_1": "Independent_PANSKURA_EAST_1", "Independent_PANSKURA_EAST_2": "Independent_PANSKURA_EAST_2", "Independent_PANSKURA_WEST_1": "Independent_PANSKURA_WEST_1", "Independent_PARA_1": "Independent_PARA_1", "Independent_PATHARPRATIMA_1": "Independent_PATHARPRATIMA_1", "Independent_PHANSIDEWA_1": "Independent_PHANSIDEWA_1", "Independent_PHANSIDEWA_2": "Independent_PHANSIDEWA_2", "Independent_POLBA_1": "Independent_POLBA_1", "Independent_PURULIA_1": "Independent_PURULIA_1", "Independent_RAGHUNATHPUR_1": "Independent_RAGHUNATHPUR_1", "Independent_RAGHUNATHPUR_2": "Independent_RAGHUNATHPUR_2", "Independent_RAIGANJ_1": "Independent_RAIGANJ_1", "Independent_RAIGANJ_2": "Independent_RAIGANJ_2", "Independent_RAIGANJ_3": "Independent_RAIGANJ_3", "Independent_RAIGANJ_4": "Independent_RAIGANJ_4", "Independent_RAIGANJ_5": "Independent_RAIGANJ_5", "Independent_RAIPUR_1": "Independent_RAIPUR_1", "Independent_RAJARHAT_1": "Independent_RAJARHAT_1", "Independent_RAJGANJ_1": "Independent_RAJGANJ_1", "Independent_RAJGANJ_2": "Independent_RAJGANJ_2", "Independent_RAJGANJ_3": "Independent_RAJGANJ_3", "Independent_RAJNAGAR_1": "Independent_RAJNAGAR_1", "Independent_RAMPURHAT_1": "Independent_RAMPURHAT_1", "Independent_RAMPURHAT_2": "Independent_RAMPURHAT_2", "Independent_RAMPURHAT_3": "Independent_RAMPURHAT_3", "Independent_RANAGHAT_EAST_1": "Independent_RANAGHAT_EAST_1", "Independent_RANAGHAT_EAST_2": "Independent_RANAGHAT_EAST_2", "Independent_RANAGHAT_EAST_3": "Independent_RANAGHAT_EAST_3", "Independent_RANAGHAT_EAST_4": "Independent_RANAGHAT_EAST_4", "Independent_RANAGHAT_WEST_1": "Independent_RANAGHAT_WEST_1", "Independent_RANAGHAT_WEST_2": "Independent_RANAGHAT_WEST_2", "Independent_RANIBANDH_1": "Independent_RANIBANDH_1", "Independent_RASHBEHARI_AVENUE_1": "Independent_RASHBEHARI_AVENUE_1", "Independent_RASHBEHARI_AVENUE_2": "Independent_RASHBEHARI_AVENUE_2", "Independent_RASHBEHARI_AVENUE_3": "Independent_RASHBEHARI_AVENUE_3", "Independent_RASHBEHARI_AVENUE_4": "Independent_RASHBEHARI_AVENUE_4", "Independent_RASHBEHARI_AVENUE_5": "Independent_RASHBEHARI_AVENUE_5", "Independent_RATUA_1": "Independent_RATUA_1", "Independent_RATUA_2": "Independent_RATUA_2", "Independent_RATUA_3": "Independent_RATUA_3", "Independent_SABANG_1": "Independent_SABANG_1", "Independent_SAGARDIGHI_1": "Independent_SAGARDIGHI_1", "Independent_SAGAR_1": "Independent_SAGAR_1", "Independent_SALBANI_1": "Independent_SALBANI_1", "Independent_SALBANI_2": "Independent_SALBANI_2", "Independent_SALBANI_3": "Independent_SALBANI_3", "Independent_SANKRAIL_1": "Independent_SANKRAIL_1", "Independent_SANKRAIL_2": "Independent_SANKRAIL_2", "Independent_SANKRAIL_3": "Independent_SANKRAIL_3", "Independent_SANKRAIL_4": "Independent_SANKRAIL_4", "Independent_SANTIPUR_1": "Independent_SANTIPUR_1", "Independent_SATGACHIA_1": "Independent_SATGACHIA_1", "Independent_SATGACHIA_2": "Independent_SATGACHIA_2", "Independent_SATGACHIA_3": "Independent_SATGACHIA_3", "Independent_SATGACHIA_4": "Independent_SATGACHIA_4", "Independent_SATGACHIA_5": "Independent_SATGACHIA_5", "Independent_SEALDAH_1": "Independent_SEALDAH_1", "Independent_SEALDAH_2": "Independent_SEALDAH_2", "Independent_SEALDAH_3": "Independent_SEALDAH_3", "Independent_SEALDAH_4": "Independent_SEALDAH_4", "Independent_SEALDAH_5": "Independent_SEALDAH_5", "Independent_SERAMPORE_1": "Independent_SERAMPORE_1", "Independent_SHIBPUR_1": "Independent_SHIBPUR_1", "Independent_SHIBPUR_2": "Independent_SHIBPUR_2", "Independent_SHIBPUR_3": "Independent_SHIBPUR_3", "Independent_SHIBPUR_4": "Independent_SHIBPUR_4", "Independent_SHIBPUR_5": "Independent_SHIBPUR_5", "Independent_SHYAMPUKUR_1": "Independent_SHYAMPUKUR_1", "Independent_SHYAMPUKUR_2": "Independent_SHYAMPUKUR_2", "Independent_SHYAMPUKUR_3": "Independent_SHYAMPUKUR_3", "Independent_SHYAMPUKUR_4": "Independent_SHYAMPUKUR_4", "Independent_SHYAMPUKUR_5": "Independent_SHYAMPUKUR_5", "Independent_SHYAMPUKUR_6": "Independent_SHYAMPUKUR_6", "Independent_SHYAMPUR_1": "Independent_SHYAMPUR_1", "Independent_SILIGURI_1": "Independent_SILIGURI_1", "Independent_SILIGURI_2": "Independent_SILIGURI_2", "Independent_SITAI_1": "Independent_SITAI_1", "Independent_SITAI_2": "Independent_SITAI_2", "Independent_SITALKUCHI_1": "Independent_SITALKUCHI_1", "Independent_SITALKUCHI_2": "Independent_SITALKUCHI_2", "Independent_SONARPUR_1": "Independent_SONARPUR_1", "Independent_SONARPUR_2": "Independent_SONARPUR_2", "Independent_SURI_1": "Independent_SURI_1", "Independent_SURI_2": "Independent_SURI_2", "Independent_SUTAHATA_1": "Independent_SUTAHATA_1", "Independent_SUTAHATA_2": "Independent_SUTAHATA_2", "Independent_SUTI_1": "Independent_SUTI_1", "Independent_SUTI_2": "Independent_SUTI_2", "Independent_SUZAPUR_1": "Independent_SUZAPUR_1", "Independent_SWARUPNAGAR_1": "Independent_SWARUPNAGAR_1", "Independent_TALDANGRA_1": "Independent_TALDANGRA_1", "Independent_TALTOLA_1": "Independent_TALTOLA_1", "Independent_TALTOLA_2": "Independent_TALTOLA_2", "Independent_TALTOLA_3": "Independent_TALTOLA_3", "Independent_TAMLUK_1": "Independent_TAMLUK_1", "Independent_TAPAN_1": "Independent_TAPAN_1", "Independent_TAPAN_2": "Independent_TAPAN_2", "Independent_TARAKESWAR_1": "Independent_TARAKESWAR_1", "Independent_TOLLYGUNGE_1": "Independent_TOLLYGUNGE_1", "Independent_TUFANGANJ_1": "Independent_TUFANGANJ_1", "Independent_TUFANGANJ_2": "Independent_TUFANGANJ_2", "Independent_TUFANGANJ_3": "Independent_TUFANGANJ_3", "Independent_UDAYNARAYANPUR_1": "Independent_UDAYNARAYANPUR_1", "Independent_UDAYNARAYANPUR_2": "Independent_UDAYNARAYANPUR_2", "Independent_UDAYNARAYANPUR_3": "Independent_UDAYNARAYANPUR_3", "Independent_UDAYNARAYANPUR_4": "Independent_UDAYNARAYANPUR_4", "Independent_UDAYNARAYANPUR_5": "Independent_UDAYNARAYANPUR_5", "Independent_UDAYNARAYANPUR_6": "Independent_UDAYNARAYANPUR_6", "Independent_UDAYNARAYANPUR_7": "Independent_UDAYNARAYANPUR_7", "Independent_UKHRA_1": "Independent_UKHRA_1", "Independent_ULUBERIA_NORTH_1": "Independent_ULUBERIA_NORTH_1", "Independent_ULUBERIA_NORTH_2": "Independent_ULUBERIA_NORTH_2", "Independent_ULUBERIA_SOUTH_1": "Independent_ULUBERIA_SOUTH_1", "Independent_ULUBERIA_SOUTH_2": "Independent_ULUBERIA_SOUTH_2", "Independent_ULUBERIA_SOUTH_3": "Independent_ULUBERIA_SOUTH_3", "Independent_UTTARPARA_1": "Independent_UTTARPARA_1", "Independent_VIDYASAGAR_1": "Independent_VIDYASAGAR_1", "Independent_VIDYASAGAR_2": "Independent_VIDYASAGAR_2", "Independent_VIDYASAGAR_3": "Independent_VIDYASAGAR_3", "Independent_VIDYASAGAR_4": "Independent_VIDYASAGAR_4", "Independent_VIDYASAGAR_5": "Independent_VIDYASAGAR_5", "Independent_VIDYASAGAR_6": "Independent_VIDYASAGAR_6", "Independent_VIDYASAGAR_7": "Independent_VIDYASAGAR_7", "Independent_VISHNUPUR_1": "Independent_VISHNUPUR_1", "JD(S)": "JD(S)", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "JDP": "JDP", "JKP(N)": "JKP(N)", "JMM": "JMM", "JUM": "JUM", "LJP": "LJP", "MUL": "MUL", "NCP": "NCP", "PBRML": "PBRML", "PDS": "PDS", "RJD": "RJD", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "RSMP": "RSMP", "RSP": "RSP", "SHS": "SHS", "SHSP": "SHSP", "SJP": "SJP", "SP": "SP", "STPI": "STPI", "WBSP": "WBSP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 294, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 294, "registered_not_positive": 294}, "n_stations_flagged": 294, "created_at": "2026-07-11T22:47:23.323121", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.768, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.854, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.721, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.569, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.111, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 294}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7619f9045631446bae48821caac15074", "name": "India 2002 state legislative assembly (vidhan sabha) (overnight India_Gujarat_2002_Assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2002, "election_type": "other", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"district_name": "district_name", "BJP": "BJP", "INC": "INC", "IND_01": "IND_01", "SAP": "SAP", "IND_02": "IND_02", "IND_03": "IND_03", "BSP": "BSP", "NCP": "NCP", "IND_04": "IND_04", "IND_05": "IND_05", "SP": "SP", "IND_06": "IND_06", "RPI": "RPI", "RGJP": "RGJP", "PRBP": "PRBP", "CPI": "CPI", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "RKEP": "RKEP", "IND_07": "IND_07", "IND_08": "IND_08", "IND_09": "IND_09", "IND_10": "IND_10", "RPI(KH)": "RPI(KH)", "CPM": "CPM", "SHS": "SHS", "JD(S)": "JD(S)", "ABJS": "ABJS", "LSWP": "LSWP", "SJP(R)": "SJP(R)", "IND_11": "IND_11", "IND_12": "IND_12", "BNP": "BNP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 182, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-11T22:47:20.643297", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.76, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.847, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.739, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.587, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.082, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.117, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.029, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.739, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.587, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.483, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.483, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.748, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.748, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 182}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "56cc9ef97c3d434f8e4212272ff70766", "name": "India 2002 parliamentary (state legislative assembly / vidhan sabha) (overnight india-uttar-pradesh-2002-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Uttar_Pradesh/Uttar_Pradesh_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ABAS": "ABAS", "ABBP": "ABBP", "ABHM": "ABHM", "ABJS": "ABJS", "ABLTC": "ABLTC", "ABLTP": "ABLTP", "ABRRP(P)": "ABRRP(P)", "AD": "AD", "AGRJP": "AGRJP", "AIMLF": "AIMLF", "AIRKC": "AIRKC", "AKD": "AKD", "AP": "AP", "ASP": "ASP", "BCVD": "BCVD", "BJKP": "BJKP", "BJP": "BJP", "BJTP": "BJTP", "BJVP": "BJVP", "BKD": "BKD", "BKPP": "BKPP", "BKRP": "BKRP", "BLP": "BLP", "BMSKM": "BMSKM", "BRVP": "BRVP", "BSD": "BSD", "BSP": "BSP", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "CPM": "CPM", "DBJ": "DBJ", "EKD(UP)": "EKD(UP)", "FBL": "FBL", "GGP": "GGP", "GRC": "GRC", "HSPS(B)": "HSPS(B)", "IEP": "IEP", "INC": "INC", "IND": "IND", "INLD": "INLD", "JD(S)": "JD(S)", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "JP": "JP", "JSAP": "JSAP", "KMBP": "KMBP", "KMM": "KMM", "KNP": "KNP", "KRD": "KRD", "KVMP": "KVMP", "KVP": "KVP", "LD": "LD", "LJNSP": "LJNSP", "LPI(V)": "LPI(V)", "LPSP": "LPSP", "LS": "LS", "LSWP": "LSWP", "MBVP": "MBVP", "MC": "MC", "MNVP": "MNVP", "MUL": "MUL", "NBNP": "NBNP", "NCP": "NCP", "NINM": "NINM", "NJSP": "NJSP", "NLP": "NLP", "PMSP": "PMSP", "PSJP": "PSJP", "PSP": "PSP", "PTSS": "PTSS", "PVP": "PVP", "RDMP": "RDMP", "RJD": "RJD", "RLD": "RLD", "RPD": "RPD", "RPI": "RPI", "RSD": "RSD", "RTKP": "RTKP", "SAP": "SAP", "SD": "SD", "SHS": "SHS", "SHSP": "SHSP", "SJP": "SJP", "SJP(R)": "SJP(R)", "SP": "SP", "SPSP": "SPSP", "SSD": "SSD", "SSJP": "SSJP", "SWJP": "SWJP", "TKD": "TKD", "TSCB": "TSCB", "UCPI": "UCPI", "UPRP": "UPRP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 403, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 403, "cast_gt_registered": 403}, "n_stations_flagged": 403, "created_at": "2026-07-11T22:47:18.689136", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.76, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.847, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.739, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.587, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.082, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.117, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.029, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.739, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.587, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.483, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.483, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.748, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.748, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 403}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3078e545c5d44c5bafc7739252e37320", "name": "Israel 2021 parliamentary (overnight israel_2021_knesset.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Israel", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://media24.bechirot.gov.il/files/expc.csv (24th Knesset host media24.bechirot.gov.il)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Labor": "Labor", "Yamina": "Yamina", "United_Torah_Judaism": "United_Torah_Judaism", "Joint_List": "Joint_List", "Manhigut_Hevratit": "Manhigut_Hevratit", "Seder_Hadash": "Seder_Hadash", "Religious_Zionist": "Religious_Zionist", "Anahnu": "Anahnu", "Kavod_HaAdam": "Kavod_HaAdam", "Ihud_Bnei_HaBrit": "Ihud_Bnei_HaBrit", "Tzafona": "Tzafona", "Piratim": "Piratim", "Democratura": "Democratura", "New_Economic_One_Israel": "New_Economic_One_Israel", "Manhigut_Yehudit_Kach": "Manhigut_Yehudit_Kach", "Blue_and_White": "Blue_and_White", "Yisrael_Beiteinu": "Yisrael_Beiteinu", "Likud": "Likud", "Meretz": "Meretz", "Gesher_Ruach": "Gesher_Ruach", "Kama": "Kama", "Rappeh": "Rappeh", "Raam_United_Arab_List": "Raam_United_Arab_List", "Yesh_Atid": "Yesh_Atid", "Daat": "Daat", "Tzomet": "Tzomet", "Kvod_HaEzrach": "Kvod_HaEzrach", "Brit_Shivyon": "Brit_Shivyon", "Economic_Freedom": "Economic_Freedom", "Pnina_Rosenblum": "Pnina_Rosenblum", "Mishpat_Tzedek": "Mishpat_Tzedek", "Mitkademet": "Mitkademet", "Zchuyot_HaMevutahim": "Zchuyot_HaMevutahim", "Meshalim": "Meshalim", "Yisraelim": "Yisraelim", "Hetz": "Hetz", "Kalkala_Yerukah": "Kalkala_Yerukah", "Shas": "Shas", "New_Hope": "New_Hope"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1215, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-11T22:47:13.108770", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.809, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.634, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.722, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.639, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.28, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.278, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.1, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.1, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1215}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b07436b88ec9467a945837968c57327f", "name": "Sri Lanka 2010 presidential (overnight srilanka_2010_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Sri Lanka", "year": 2010, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://elections.gov.lk/web/wp-content/uploads/election-results/presidential-elections/PresidentialElections2010.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Mahinda_Rajapaksa": "Mahinda_Rajapaksa", "Sarath_Fonseka": "Sarath_Fonseka", "MCM_Ismail": "MCM_Ismail", "Achala_Suraweera": "Achala_Suraweera", "Channa_Gamage": "Channa_Gamage", "WV_Mahiman_Ranjith": "WV_Mahiman_Ranjith", "ASP_Liyanage": "ASP_Liyanage", "Sarath_Manamendra": "Sarath_Manamendra", "MK_Sivajilingam": "MK_Sivajilingam", "Ukkubanda_Wijekoon": "Ukkubanda_Wijekoon", "Lal_Perera": "Lal_Perera", "Sirithunga_Jayasuriya": "Sirithunga_Jayasuriya", "Vickramabahu_Karunaratna": "Vickramabahu_Karunaratna", "Aithurus_Ilias": "Aithurus_Ilias", "Wije_Dias": "Wije_Dias", "Sanath_Pinnaduwa": "Sanath_Pinnaduwa", "MB_Theminimulla": "MB_Theminimulla", "Upali_Kongahage": "Upali_Kongahage", "M_Musthaffa": "M_Musthaffa", "Seelarathana_Thero": "Seelarathana_Thero", "Senaratna_de_Silva": "Senaratna_de_Silva", "Aruna_de_Zoysa": "Aruna_de_Zoysa"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 187, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-11T22:47:12.093022", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.551, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.548, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.386, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.244, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.548, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.637, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.012, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.572, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.643, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.662, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.69, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.217, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.386, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.386, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.244, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.244, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.279, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.279, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.632, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.465, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.465, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "United People's Freedom Alliance", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "New Democratic Front", "margin": 18.01, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "LKA", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 187}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6f611738a16d4ceea676285d3bd03030", "name": "Pakistan 2018 provincial (overnight pakistan_2018_kp_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 2018, "election_type": "other", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/colincookman/pakistan_election_results_2018/master/pk_candidate_data_2018.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"constituency_number": "constituency_number", "ANP": "ANP", "APML": "APML", "Independent": "Independent", "MMA": "MMA", "Other": "Other", "PMLN": "PMLN", "PPPP": "PPPP", "PTI": "PTI", "QWP": "QWP", "TLP": "TLP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 97, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 97}, "n_stations_flagged": 97, "created_at": "2026-07-11T22:47:11.553998", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.98, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.493, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.395, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.25, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.98, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.495, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.493, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.104, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.526, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.159, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.869, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.435, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.25, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.25, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.134, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 97}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5e1026a23380485ea84044160d152dd5", "name": "Pakistan 2018 parliamentary (overnight pakistan_2018_sindh_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/colincookman/pakistan_election_results_2018 (pk_candidate_data_2018.csv, master)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"party_All_Pakistan_Muslim_League": "party_All_Pakistan_Muslim_League", "party_Allah_o_Akbar_Tehreek": "party_Allah_o_Akbar_Tehreek", "party_Amun_Taraqqi_Party": "party_Amun_Taraqqi_Party", "party_Awami_National_Party": "party_Awami_National_Party", "party_Awami_Workers_Party": "party_Awami_Workers_Party", "party_Balochistan_National_Party": "party_Balochistan_National_Party", "party_Barabri_Party_Pakistan": "party_Barabri_Party_Pakistan", "party_Grand_Democratic_Alliance": "party_Grand_Democratic_Alliance", "party_Independent": "party_Independent", "party_Jamiat_Ulama_e_Islam_Pakistan_S": "party_Jamiat_Ulama_e_Islam_Pakistan_S", "party_Jamiat_Ulama_e_Pakistan_Noorani": "party_Jamiat_Ulama_e_Pakistan_Noorani", "party_Majlis_e_Wahdat_e_Muslimeen_Pakistan": "party_Majlis_e_Wahdat_e_Muslimeen_Pakistan", "party_Mohajir_Qaumi_Movement_Pakistan": "party_Mohajir_Qaumi_Movement_Pakistan", "party_Move_on_Pakistan": "party_Move_on_Pakistan", "party_Mutahidda_Qabail_Party": "party_Mutahidda_Qabail_Party", "party_Muttahida_Majlis_e_Amal_Pakistan": "party_Muttahida_Majlis_e_Amal_Pakistan", "party_Muttahida_Qaumi_Movement_Pakistan": "party_Muttahida_Qaumi_Movement_Pakistan", "party_National_Party": "party_National_Party", "party_Pak_Sarzameen_Party": "party_Pak_Sarzameen_Party", "party_Pakistan_Citizen_Movement": "party_Pakistan_Citizen_Movement", "party_Pakistan_Conservative_Party": "party_Pakistan_Conservative_Party", "party_Pakistan_Falah_Party": "party_Pakistan_Falah_Party", "party_Pakistan_Justice_Democratic_Party": "party_Pakistan_Justice_Democratic_Party", "party_Pakistan_Kissan_Ittehad_Ch_Anwar": "party_Pakistan_Kissan_Ittehad_Ch_Anwar", "party_Pakistan_Muslim_Alliance": "party_Pakistan_Muslim_Alliance", "party_Pakistan_Muslim_League": "party_Pakistan_Muslim_League", "party_Pakistan_Muslim_League_N": "party_Pakistan_Muslim_League_N", "party_Pakistan_Muslim_League_Sher_e_Bangal": "party_Pakistan_Muslim_League_Sher_e_Bangal", "party_Pakistan_Peoples_Party_Shaheed_Bhutto": "party_Pakistan_Peoples_Party_Shaheed_Bhutto", "party_Pakistan_Peoples_Party_Parliamentarians": "party_Pakistan_Peoples_Party_Parliamentarians", "party_Pakistan_Rah_e_Haq_Party": "party_Pakistan_Rah_e_Haq_Party", "party_Pakistan_Siraiki_Party_T": "party_Pakistan_Siraiki_Party_T", "party_Pakistan_Sunni_Tehreek": "party_Pakistan_Sunni_Tehreek", "party_Pakistan_Tehreek_e_Insaf": "party_Pakistan_Tehreek_e_Insaf", "party_Pakistan_Tehreek_e_Insaf_Gulalai": "party_Pakistan_Tehreek_e_Insaf_Gulalai", "party_Pasban_Pakistan": "party_Pasban_Pakistan", "party_Pashtoonkhwa_Milli_Awami_Party": "party_Pashtoonkhwa_Milli_Awami_Party", "party_Peoples_Movement_of_Pakistan_PMP": "party_Peoples_Movement_of_Pakistan_PMP", "party_Sindh_United_Party": "party_Sindh_United_Party", "party_Tabdeeli_Pasand_Party_Pakistan": "party_Tabdeeli_Pasand_Party_Pakistan", "party_Tehreek_Jawanan_Pakistan": "party_Tehreek_Jawanan_Pakistan", "party_Tehreek_e_Labbaik_Islam": "party_Tehreek_e_Labbaik_Islam", "party_Tehreek_e_Labbaik_Pakistan": "party_Tehreek_e_Labbaik_Pakistan", "party_Tehreek_e_Suba_Hazara_Pakistan": "party_Tehreek_e_Suba_Hazara_Pakistan"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 129, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-11T22:47:10.871009", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.98, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.493, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.395, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.25, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.98, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.495, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.493, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.104, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.526, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.159, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.869, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.435, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.25, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.25, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.134, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 129}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "59164f8e4c254beebe1779259ceca76d", "name": "Pakistan 2018 provincial (overnight pakistan_2018_punjab_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 2018, "election_type": "other", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/colincookman/pakistan_election_results_2018/master/pk_candidate_data_2018.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"constituency_number": "constituency_number", "Aam Admi Tehreek Pakistan": "Aam Admi Tehreek Pakistan", "Aam Awam Party": "Aam Awam Party", "Aam Log Party Pakistan": "Aam Log Party Pakistan", "All Pakistan Minority Movement": "All Pakistan Minority Movement", "All Pakistan Muslim League": "All Pakistan Muslim League", "All Pakistan Muslim League (jinnah)": "All Pakistan Muslim League (jinnah)", "Allah-o-Akbar Tehreek": "Allah-o-Akbar Tehreek", "Amun Taraqqi Party": "Amun Taraqqi Party", "Awam League": "Awam League", "Awami Justice Party Pakistan": "Awami Justice Party Pakistan", "Awami National Party": "Awami National Party", "Awami Party Pakistan-S": "Awami Party Pakistan-S", "Awami Workers Party": "Awami Workers Party", "Barabri Party Pakistan": "Barabri Party Pakistan", "Front National (Pakistan)": "Front National (Pakistan)", "Grand Democratic Alliance": "Grand Democratic Alliance", "Independent": "Independent", "Islami Jamhoori Ittehad Pakistan": "Islami Jamhoori Ittehad Pakistan", "Jamhoori Wattan Party": "Jamhoori Wattan Party", "Jamiat Ulama-e-Islam Pakistan (S)": "Jamiat Ulama-e-Islam Pakistan (S)", "Jamiat Ulama-e-Pakistan (Noorani)": "Jamiat Ulama-e-Pakistan (Noorani)", "Jannat Pakistan Party": "Jannat Pakistan Party", "Move on Pakistan": "Move on Pakistan", "Mustaqbil Pakistan": "Mustaqbil Pakistan", "Mutahidda Qabail Party": "Mutahidda Qabail Party", "Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal Pakistan": "Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal Pakistan", "Muttahida Qaumi Movement Pakistan": "Muttahida Qaumi Movement Pakistan", "Muttahidda Ulema-e-Mashaikh Council of Pakistan": "Muttahidda Ulema-e-Mashaikh Council of Pakistan", "National Party": "National Party", "National Peace Council Party": "National Peace Council Party", "Pak Sarzameen Party": "Pak Sarzameen Party", "Pakistan Aman Party": "Pakistan Aman Party", "Pakistan Awami League": "Pakistan Awami League", "Pakistan Awami Raj": "Pakistan Awami Raj", "Pakistan Falah Party": "Pakistan Falah Party", "Pakistan Freedom Movement": "Pakistan Freedom Movement", "Pakistan Human Party": "Pakistan Human Party", "Pakistan Justice & Democratic Party": "Pakistan Justice & Democratic Party", "Pakistan Kissan Ittehad(Ch. Anwar)": "Pakistan Kissan Ittehad(Ch. Anwar)", "Pakistan Muslim Alliance": "Pakistan Muslim Alliance", "Pakistan Muslim League": "Pakistan Muslim League", "Pakistan Muslim League (N)": "Pakistan Muslim League (N)", "Pakistan Muslim League Orginization": "Pakistan Muslim League Orginization", "Pakistan Muslim League(Z)": "Pakistan Muslim League(Z)", "Pakistan National Muslim League": "Pakistan National Muslim League", "Pakistan Peoples Party": "Pakistan Peoples Party", "Pakistan Peoples Party (Shaheed Bhutto)": "Pakistan Peoples Party (Shaheed Bhutto)", "Pakistan Peoples Party Parliamentarians": "Pakistan Peoples Party Parliamentarians", "Pakistan Quami Yakjehti Party": "Pakistan Quami Yakjehti Party", "Pakistan Rah-e-Haq Party": "Pakistan Rah-e-Haq Party", "Pakistan Sunni Tehreek": "Pakistan Sunni Tehreek", "Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf": "Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf", "Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Nazriati": "Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Nazriati", "Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf-Gulalai": "Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf-Gulalai", "Pashtoonkhwa Milli Awami Party": "Pashtoonkhwa Milli Awami Party", "Peoples Movement of Pakistan (PMP)": "Peoples Movement of Pakistan (PMP)", "Roshan Pakistan League": "Roshan Pakistan League", "Saraiskistan Democratic Party": "Saraiskistan Democratic Party", "Sunni Ittehad Council": "Sunni Ittehad Council", "Tehreek Jawanan Pakistan": "Tehreek Jawanan Pakistan", "Tehreek Tabdili Nizam Pakistan": "Tehreek Tabdili Nizam Pakistan", "Tehreek-e-Labbaik Islam": "Tehreek-e-Labbaik Islam", "Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan": "Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 295, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-11T22:47:09.380211", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.98, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.493, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.395, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.25, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.98, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.495, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.493, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.104, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.526, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.159, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.869, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.435, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.25, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.25, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.134, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 295}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "575a5c3ff39b41d6b4113e3606d145b7", "name": "Singapore 2020 parliamentary (overnight singapore_2020_ge.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Singapore", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"INDP": "INDP", "NSP": "NSP", "PAP": "PAP", "PPP": "PPP", "PSP": "PSP", "PV": "PV", "RDU": "RDU", "RP": "RP", "SDA": "SDA", "SDP": "SDP", "SPP": "SPP", "WP": "WP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 31, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-11T22:47:08.984862", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.362, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.826, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.402, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.332, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.362, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.826, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.132, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.716, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.148, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.679, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.08, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.402, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.402, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.332, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.332, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.349, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.349, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.813, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.813, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.008, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.008, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.338, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.338, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 31}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a9aee6afcea24ef9869ce7636f5d7346", "name": "Thailand 2019 parliamentary (overnight thailand_2019_hor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Thailand", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/electinth/past-election-map/blob/master/tools/csv/candidate_result_2562.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e23\u0e31\u0e10": "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e23\u0e31\u0e10", "\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e32\u0e04\u0e15\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48": "\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e32\u0e04\u0e15\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48", "\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e31\u0e15\u0e22\u0e4c": "\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e31\u0e15\u0e22\u0e4c", "\u0e20\u0e39\u0e21\u0e34\u0e43\u0e08\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e20\u0e39\u0e21\u0e34\u0e43\u0e08\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e40\u0e2a\u0e23\u0e35\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e40\u0e2a\u0e23\u0e35\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e1e\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e32": "\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e1e\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e32", "\u0e40\u0e28\u0e23\u0e29\u0e10\u0e01\u0e34\u0e08\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48": "\u0e40\u0e28\u0e23\u0e29\u0e10\u0e01\u0e34\u0e08\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48", "\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34": "\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34", "\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34": "\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34", "\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e1e\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e32": "\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e1e\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e32", "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e17\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e16\u0e34\u0e48\u0e19\u0e44\u0e17": "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e17\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e16\u0e34\u0e48\u0e19\u0e44\u0e17", "\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e29\u0e4c\u0e1c\u0e37\u0e19\u0e1b\u0e48\u0e32\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e40\u0e17\u0e28\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e29\u0e4c\u0e1c\u0e37\u0e19\u0e1b\u0e48\u0e32\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e40\u0e17\u0e28\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e27\u0e07\u0e0a\u0e19\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e27\u0e07\u0e0a\u0e19\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e20\u0e34\u0e27\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e4c": "\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e20\u0e34\u0e27\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e4c", "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e28\u0e23\u0e35\u0e27\u0e34\u0e44\u0e25\u0e22\u0e4c": "\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e28\u0e23\u0e35\u0e27\u0e34\u0e44\u0e25\u0e22\u0e4c", "\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e19\u0e34\u0e22\u0e21": "\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e19\u0e34\u0e22\u0e21", "\u0e04\u0e23\u0e39\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e19": "\u0e04\u0e23\u0e39\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e19", "\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e19\u0e1b\u0e0f\u0e34\u0e23\u0e39\u0e1b": "\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e19\u0e1b\u0e0f\u0e34\u0e23\u0e39\u0e1b", "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e40\u0e21\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e40\u0e21\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e44\u0e15\u0e22\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48": "\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e44\u0e15\u0e22\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48", "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48": "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48", "\u0e44\u0e17\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21": "\u0e44\u0e17\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21", "\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e41\u0e1c\u0e48\u0e19\u0e14\u0e34\u0e19": "\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e41\u0e1c\u0e48\u0e19\u0e14\u0e34\u0e19", "\u0e17\u0e32\u0e07\u0e40\u0e25\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e01\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48": "\u0e17\u0e32\u0e07\u0e40\u0e25\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e01\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48", "\u0e20\u0e23\u0e32\u0e14\u0e23\u0e20\u0e32\u0e1e": "\u0e20\u0e23\u0e32\u0e14\u0e23\u0e20\u0e32\u0e1e", "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e44\u0e15\u0e22": "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e44\u0e15\u0e22", "\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e04\u0e19\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e04\u0e19\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e2a\u0e23\u0e49\u0e32\u0e07\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34": "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e2a\u0e23\u0e49\u0e32\u0e07\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34", "\u0e01\u0e23\u0e35\u0e19": "\u0e01\u0e23\u0e35\u0e19", "\u0e41\u0e1c\u0e48\u0e19\u0e14\u0e34\u0e19\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21": "\u0e41\u0e1c\u0e48\u0e19\u0e14\u0e34\u0e19\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21", "\u0e21\u0e2b\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e19": "\u0e21\u0e2b\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e19", "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e07\u0e04\u0e21": "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e07\u0e04\u0e21", "\u0e40\u0e04\u0e23\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e02\u0e48\u0e32\u0e22\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e27\u0e19\u0e32\u0e41\u0e2b\u0e48\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e40\u0e17\u0e28\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e40\u0e04\u0e23\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e02\u0e48\u0e32\u0e22\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e27\u0e19\u0e32\u0e41\u0e2b\u0e48\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e40\u0e17\u0e28\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e41\u0e17\u0e19\u0e04\u0e38\u0e13\u0e41\u0e1c\u0e48\u0e19\u0e14\u0e34\u0e19": "\u0e41\u0e17\u0e19\u0e04\u0e38\u0e13\u0e41\u0e1c\u0e48\u0e19\u0e14\u0e34\u0e19", "\u0e2a\u0e22\u0e32\u0e21\u0e1e\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e32": "\u0e2a\u0e22\u0e32\u0e21\u0e1e\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e32", "\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21": "\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21", "\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e43\u0e08\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e43\u0e08\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e04\u0e25\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e04\u0e25\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e1c\u0e36\u0e49\u0e07\u0e2b\u0e25\u0e27\u0e07": "\u0e1c\u0e36\u0e49\u0e07\u0e2b\u0e25\u0e27\u0e07", "\u0e20\u0e32\u0e04\u0e35\u0e40\u0e04\u0e23\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e02\u0e48\u0e32\u0e22\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e20\u0e32\u0e04\u0e35\u0e40\u0e04\u0e23\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e02\u0e48\u0e32\u0e22\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e01\u0e23\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e01\u0e23\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e1e\u0e31\u0e19\u0e18\u0e38\u0e4c\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e1e\u0e31\u0e19\u0e18\u0e38\u0e4c\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34": "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34", "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e28\u0e23\u0e31\u0e17\u0e18\u0e32": "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e28\u0e23\u0e31\u0e17\u0e18\u0e32", "\u0e04\u0e27\u0e32\u0e21\u0e2b\u0e27\u0e31\u0e07\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48": "\u0e04\u0e27\u0e32\u0e21\u0e2b\u0e27\u0e31\u0e07\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48", "\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e1e\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e32": "\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e1e\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e32", "\u0e16\u0e34\u0e48\u0e19\u0e01\u0e32\u0e02\u0e32\u0e27\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e27\u0e27\u0e34\u0e44\u0e25": "\u0e16\u0e34\u0e48\u0e19\u0e01\u0e32\u0e02\u0e32\u0e27\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e27\u0e27\u0e34\u0e44\u0e25", "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e04\u0e23\u0e39\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e04\u0e23\u0e39\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21": "\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21", "\u0e01\u0e25\u0e32\u0e07": "\u0e01\u0e25\u0e32\u0e07", "\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e07\u0e04\u0e21\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e44\u0e15\u0e22\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e07\u0e04\u0e21\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e44\u0e15\u0e22\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e2a\u0e32\u0e21\u0e31\u0e0d\u0e0a\u0e19": "\u0e2a\u0e32\u0e21\u0e31\u0e0d\u0e0a\u0e19", "\u0e10\u0e32\u0e19\u0e23\u0e32\u0e01\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e10\u0e32\u0e19\u0e23\u0e32\u0e01\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01": "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01", "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e41\u0e1c\u0e48\u0e19\u0e14\u0e34\u0e19\u0e17\u0e2d\u0e07": "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e41\u0e1c\u0e48\u0e19\u0e14\u0e34\u0e19\u0e17\u0e2d\u0e07", "\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e23\u0e38\u0e48\u0e07\u0e40\u0e23\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e07": "\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e23\u0e38\u0e48\u0e07\u0e40\u0e23\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e07", "\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e17\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e16\u0e34\u0e48\u0e19\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e17\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e16\u0e34\u0e48\u0e19\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e20\u0e39\u0e21\u0e34\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e40\u0e01\u0e29\u0e15\u0e23\u0e01\u0e23\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e20\u0e39\u0e21\u0e34\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e40\u0e01\u0e29\u0e15\u0e23\u0e01\u0e23\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e41\u0e23\u0e07\u0e07\u0e32\u0e19\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e41\u0e23\u0e07\u0e07\u0e32\u0e19\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e14\u0e35": "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e14\u0e35", "\u0e04\u0e19\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21\u0e14\u0e32\u0e41\u0e2b\u0e48\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e40\u0e17\u0e28\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e04\u0e19\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21\u0e14\u0e32\u0e41\u0e2b\u0e48\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e40\u0e17\u0e28\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e2a\u0e2b\u0e01\u0e23\u0e13\u0e4c": "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e2a\u0e2b\u0e01\u0e23\u0e13\u0e4c", "\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e0a\u0e35\u0e27\u0e34\u0e15\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48": "\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e0a\u0e35\u0e27\u0e34\u0e15\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48", "\u0e1e\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e32\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e40\u0e17\u0e28\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e1e\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e32\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e40\u0e17\u0e28\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e2a\u0e2b\u0e01\u0e23\u0e13\u0e4c\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e2a\u0e2b\u0e01\u0e23\u0e13\u0e4c\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e21\u0e15\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32": "\u0e21\u0e15\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32", "\u0e22\u0e32\u0e07\u0e1e\u0e32\u0e23\u0e32\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e22\u0e32\u0e07\u0e1e\u0e32\u0e23\u0e32\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e44\u0e15\u0e22\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e19": "\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e44\u0e15\u0e22\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e19", "\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e29\u0e4c\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21": "\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e29\u0e4c\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21", "\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e32\u0e04\u0e15\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e32\u0e04\u0e15\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e01\u0e2a\u0e34\u0e01\u0e23\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e01\u0e2a\u0e34\u0e01\u0e23\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e04\u0e19\u0e07\u0e32\u0e19\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e04\u0e19\u0e07\u0e32\u0e19\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e04\u0e19\u0e01\u0e35\u0e2c\u0e32": "\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e04\u0e19\u0e01\u0e35\u0e2c\u0e32", "\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e29\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34": "\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e29\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 350, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 350, "registered_not_positive": 350}, "n_stations_flagged": 350, "created_at": "2026-07-11T22:47:07.407361", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.124, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.645, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.208, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.184, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.124, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.476, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.307, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.077, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.252, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.313, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.208, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.208, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.184, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.159, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.159, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.445, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.621, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.696, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.455, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 350}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b0e465c86c1d4a7e8ad259ee3753a987", "name": "Malaysia 2018 parliamentary (overnight malaysia_2018_ge14.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/Thibico/malaysia-election-data-scraping", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AMANAH": "AMANAH", "ANAK NEGERI": "ANAK NEGERI", "BEBAS": "BEBAS", "BERJASA": "BERJASA", "BERSATU": "BERSATU", "DAP": "DAP", "GERAKAN": "GERAKAN", "HARAPAN RAKYAT": "HARAPAN RAKYAT", "IKATAN": "IKATAN", "LDP": "LDP", "MCA": "MCA", "MIC": "MIC", "MU": "MU", "MYPPP": "MYPPP", "PAP": "PAP", "PAS": "PAS", "PBB": "PBB", "PBDSB": "PBDSB", "PBK": "PBK", "PBRS": "PBRS", "PBS": "PBS", "PCM": "PCM", "PCS": "PCS", "PDP": "PDP", "PEACE": "PEACE", "PERPADUAN": "PERPADUAN", "PFP": "PFP", "PKR": "PKR", "PPRS": "PPRS", "PRM": "PRM", "PRS": "PRS", "PSM": "PSM", "SAPP": "SAPP", "SOLIDARITI": "SOLIDARITI", "SPDP": "SPDP", "STAR": "STAR", "SUPP": "SUPP", "UMNO": "UMNO", "UPKO": "UPKO", "WARISAN": "WARISAN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 222, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-11T22:47:06.201751", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.75, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.444, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.319, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.576, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.644, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.394, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.348, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.255, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.314, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.146, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.169, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.444, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.444, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.319, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.319, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.334, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.334, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.271, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.271, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.634, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.634, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 222}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e0a05a0d0c0a426b932eec4ecadde943", "name": "Thailand 2023 parliamentary (overnight thailand_2023_hor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Thailand", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/thanaphornkanking/thailand-election-2023-data/raw/main/ectreport66.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"party_10_\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e32\u0e04\u0e15\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "party_10_\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e32\u0e04\u0e15\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "party_11_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34": "party_11_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34", "party_12_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "party_12_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "party_13_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e0a\u0e19\u0e30": "party_13_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e0a\u0e19\u0e30", "party_14_\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e1e\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e32\u0e01\u0e25\u0e49\u0e32": "party_14_\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e1e\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e32\u0e01\u0e25\u0e49\u0e32", "party_15_\u0e01\u0e23\u0e35\u0e19": "party_15_\u0e01\u0e23\u0e35\u0e19", "party_16_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e2a\u0e22\u0e32\u0e21": "party_16_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e2a\u0e22\u0e32\u0e21", "party_17_\u0e40\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e2d\u0e20\u0e32\u0e04": "party_17_\u0e40\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e2d\u0e20\u0e32\u0e04", "party_18_\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e1e\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e32": "party_18_\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e1e\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e32", "party_19_\u0e20\u0e32\u0e04\u0e35\u0e40\u0e04\u0e23\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e02\u0e48\u0e32\u0e22\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "party_19_\u0e20\u0e32\u0e04\u0e35\u0e40\u0e04\u0e23\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e02\u0e48\u0e32\u0e22\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "party_1_\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48": "party_1_\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48", "party_20_\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e25\u0e35\u0e48\u0e22\u0e19": "party_20_\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e25\u0e35\u0e48\u0e22\u0e19", "party_21_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e20\u0e31\u0e01\u0e14\u0e35": "party_21_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e20\u0e31\u0e01\u0e14\u0e35", "party_22_\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e2a\u0e23\u0e49\u0e32\u0e07\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34": "party_22_\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e2a\u0e23\u0e49\u0e32\u0e07\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34", "party_23_\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e43\u0e08\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "party_23_\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e43\u0e08\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "party_24_\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34": "party_24_\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34", "party_25_\u0e40\u0e2a\u0e23\u0e35\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "party_25_\u0e40\u0e2a\u0e23\u0e35\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "party_26_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e31\u0e15\u0e22\u0e4c": "party_26_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e31\u0e15\u0e22\u0e4c", "party_27_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48": "party_27_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48", "party_28_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e1e\u0e23\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e21": "party_28_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e1e\u0e23\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e21", "party_29_\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "party_29_\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "party_2_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e44\u0e15\u0e22\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48": "party_2_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e44\u0e15\u0e22\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48", "party_30_\u0e17\u0e32\u0e07\u0e40\u0e25\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e01\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48": "party_30_\u0e17\u0e32\u0e07\u0e40\u0e25\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e01\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48", "party_31_\u0e01\u0e49\u0e32\u0e27\u0e44\u0e01\u0e25": "party_31_\u0e01\u0e49\u0e32\u0e27\u0e44\u0e01\u0e25", "party_32_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e2a\u0e23\u0e49\u0e32\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "party_32_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e2a\u0e23\u0e49\u0e32\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "party_33_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e47\u0e19\u0e2b\u0e19\u0e36\u0e48\u0e07": "party_33_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e47\u0e19\u0e2b\u0e19\u0e36\u0e48\u0e07", "party_34_\u0e41\u0e1c\u0e48\u0e19\u0e14\u0e34\u0e19\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21": "party_34_\u0e41\u0e1c\u0e48\u0e19\u0e14\u0e34\u0e19\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21", "party_35_\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07": "party_35_\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07", "party_36_\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "party_36_\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "party_37_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e23\u0e31\u0e10": "party_37_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e23\u0e31\u0e10", "party_38_\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e44\u0e17\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07": "party_38_\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e44\u0e17\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07", "party_39_\u0e21\u0e34\u0e15\u0e34\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48": "party_39_\u0e21\u0e34\u0e15\u0e34\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48", "party_3_\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e47\u0e19\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21": "party_3_\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e47\u0e19\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21", "party_40_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e20\u0e34\u0e27\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e4c": "party_40_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e20\u0e34\u0e27\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e4c", "party_41_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21": "party_41_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21", "party_42_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e28\u0e23\u0e35\u0e27\u0e34\u0e44\u0e25\u0e22\u0e4c": "party_42_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e28\u0e23\u0e35\u0e27\u0e34\u0e44\u0e25\u0e22\u0e4c", "party_43_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e2a\u0e2b\u0e01\u0e23\u0e13\u0e4c": "party_43_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e2a\u0e2b\u0e01\u0e23\u0e13\u0e4c", "party_44_\u0e23\u0e32\u0e29\u0e0e\u0e23\u0e4c\u0e27\u0e34\u0e16\u0e35": "party_44_\u0e23\u0e32\u0e29\u0e0e\u0e23\u0e4c\u0e27\u0e34\u0e16\u0e35", "party_45_\u0e41\u0e19\u0e27\u0e17\u0e32\u0e07\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48": "party_45_\u0e41\u0e19\u0e27\u0e17\u0e32\u0e07\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48", "party_46_\u0e16\u0e34\u0e48\u0e19\u0e01\u0e32\u0e02\u0e32\u0e27\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e27\u0e27\u0e34\u0e44\u0e25": "party_46_\u0e16\u0e34\u0e48\u0e19\u0e01\u0e32\u0e02\u0e32\u0e27\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e27\u0e27\u0e34\u0e44\u0e25", "party_47_\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e41\u0e1c\u0e48\u0e19\u0e14\u0e34\u0e19": "party_47_\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e41\u0e1c\u0e48\u0e19\u0e14\u0e34\u0e19", "party_48_\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e32\u0e04\u0e15\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "party_48_\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e32\u0e04\u0e15\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "party_49_\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e29\u0e4c\u0e1c\u0e37\u0e19\u0e1b\u0e48\u0e32\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e40\u0e17\u0e28\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "party_49_\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e29\u0e4c\u0e1c\u0e37\u0e19\u0e1b\u0e48\u0e32\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e40\u0e17\u0e28\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "party_4_\u0e17\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e17\u0e35\u0e48\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "party_4_\u0e17\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e17\u0e35\u0e48\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "party_50_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e27\u0e07\u0e0a\u0e19\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "party_50_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e27\u0e07\u0e0a\u0e19\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "party_51_\u0e2a\u0e32\u0e21\u0e31\u0e0d\u0e0a\u0e19": "party_51_\u0e2a\u0e32\u0e21\u0e31\u0e0d\u0e0a\u0e19", "party_52_\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e23\u0e38\u0e48\u0e07\u0e40\u0e23\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e07": "party_52_\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e23\u0e38\u0e48\u0e07\u0e40\u0e23\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e07", "party_53_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e07\u0e04\u0e21": "party_53_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e07\u0e04\u0e21", "party_54_\u0e20\u0e23\u0e32\u0e14\u0e23\u0e20\u0e32\u0e1e": "party_54_\u0e20\u0e23\u0e32\u0e14\u0e23\u0e20\u0e32\u0e1e", "party_55_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e01\u0e49\u0e32\u0e27\u0e2b\u0e19\u0e49\u0e32": "party_55_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e01\u0e49\u0e32\u0e27\u0e2b\u0e19\u0e49\u0e32", "party_56_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "party_56_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "party_57_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "party_57_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "party_58_\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e07\u0e04\u0e21\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e44\u0e15\u0e22\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "party_58_\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e07\u0e04\u0e21\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e44\u0e15\u0e22\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "party_59_\u0e0a\u0e48\u0e27\u0e22\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34": "party_59_\u0e0a\u0e48\u0e27\u0e22\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34", "party_5_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e07\u0e04\u0e21\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48": "party_5_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e07\u0e04\u0e21\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48", "party_60_\u0e04\u0e27\u0e32\u0e21\u0e2b\u0e27\u0e31\u0e07\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48": "party_60_\u0e04\u0e27\u0e32\u0e21\u0e2b\u0e27\u0e31\u0e07\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48", "party_61_\u0e04\u0e25\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "party_61_\u0e04\u0e25\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "party_62_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34": "party_62_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34", "party_63_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e01\u0e23\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "party_63_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e01\u0e23\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "party_64_\u0e40\u0e2a\u0e49\u0e19\u0e14\u0e49\u0e32\u0e22": "party_64_\u0e40\u0e2a\u0e49\u0e19\u0e14\u0e49\u0e32\u0e22", "party_65_\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e25\u0e35\u0e48\u0e22\u0e19\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e32\u0e04\u0e15": "party_65_\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e25\u0e35\u0e48\u0e22\u0e19\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e32\u0e04\u0e15", "party_66_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e44\u0e15\u0e22": "party_66_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e44\u0e15\u0e22", "party_67_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e32\u0e23\u0e4c\u0e17": "party_67_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e32\u0e23\u0e4c\u0e17", "party_6_\u0e04\u0e23\u0e39\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e19": "party_6_\u0e04\u0e23\u0e39\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e19", "party_7_\u0e20\u0e39\u0e21\u0e34\u0e43\u0e08\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "party_7_\u0e20\u0e39\u0e21\u0e34\u0e43\u0e08\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "party_8_\u0e41\u0e23\u0e07\u0e07\u0e32\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e23\u0e49\u0e32\u0e07\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34": "party_8_\u0e41\u0e23\u0e07\u0e07\u0e32\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e23\u0e49\u0e32\u0e07\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34", "party_9_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07": "party_9_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07", "party_id711_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e2a\u0e32\u0e21\u0e31\u0e04\u0e04\u0e35": "party_id711_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e2a\u0e32\u0e21\u0e31\u0e04\u0e04\u0e35", "party_id713_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e1a\u0e39\u0e23\u0e1e\u0e32": "party_id713_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e1a\u0e39\u0e23\u0e1e\u0e32", "party_id720_\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e29\u0e4c\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21": "party_id720_\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e29\u0e4c\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 400, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:32:50.479738", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.266, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.295, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.16, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.576, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.099, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.275, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.632, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.295, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.191, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.191, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.654, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.557, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 400}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "006bfe0342814b53a95fe3f9abda43c2", "name": "Myanmar 2020 parliamentary (overnight myanmar_2020_pyithu_hluttaw.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Myanmar", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ANP": "ANP", "Arakan_Front_Party_AFP": "Arakan_Front_Party_AFP", "Independent": "Independent", "KSPP": "KSPP", "KySDP": "KySDP", "MUP": "MUP", "NDF": "NDF", "NLD": "NLD", "NUP": "NUP", "Other": "Other", "PNO": "PNO", "PPP": "PPP", "SNDP": "SNDP", "SNLD": "SNLD", "TNP": "TNP", "UBP": "UBP", "USDP": "USDP", "Wa_National_Party": "Wa_National_Party", "ZCD": "ZCD"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 313, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:32:46.491263", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 313}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0530d5c27d96474594366b53b6fd3f1a", "name": "Pakistan 2018 parliamentary (overnight pakistan_2018_na_general.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/colincookman/pakistan_election_results_2018 (pk_candidate_data_2018.csv)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Allah-o-Akbar Tehreek": "Allah-o-Akbar Tehreek", "Awami Muslim League Pakistan": "Awami Muslim League Pakistan", "Awami National Party": "Awami National Party", "Balochistan Awami Party": "Balochistan Awami Party", "Balochistan National Party": "Balochistan National Party", "Grand Democratic Alliance": "Grand Democratic Alliance", "Independent": "Independent", "Jamhoori Wattan Party": "Jamhoori Wattan Party", "Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal Pakistan": "Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal Pakistan", "Muttahida Qaumi Movement Pakistan": "Muttahida Qaumi Movement Pakistan", "Pak Sarzameen Party": "Pak Sarzameen Party", "Pakistan Awami Raj": "Pakistan Awami Raj", "Pakistan Muslim League": "Pakistan Muslim League", "Pakistan Muslim League (F)": "Pakistan Muslim League (F)", "Pakistan Muslim League (N)": "Pakistan Muslim League (N)", "Pakistan Peoples Party Parliamentarians": "Pakistan Peoples Party Parliamentarians", "Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf": "Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf", "Pashtoonkhwa Milli Awami Party": "Pashtoonkhwa Milli Awami Party", "Qaumi Watan Party": "Qaumi Watan Party", "Sindh United Party": "Sindh United Party", "Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan": "Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan", "Other Parties": "Other Parties"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 270, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:32:44.849894", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.98, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.493, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.395, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.25, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.98, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.495, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.493, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.104, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.526, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.159, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.869, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.435, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.25, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.25, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.134, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 270}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b02ced13466648538c5d81d896e9d23a", "name": "Pakistan 2013 parliamentary (overnight pakistan_2013_na_general.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/colincookman/pakistan_elections", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AJIP": "AJIP", "ANP": "ANP", "APML": "APML", "Independent": "Independent", "JI": "JI", "JUIF": "JUIF", "JUIS": "JUIS", "MQM": "MQM", "NP": "NP", "NPP": "NPP", "Other": "Other", "PMLF": "PMLF", "PMLN": "PMLN", "PMLQ": "PMLQ", "PMLZ": "PMLZ", "PPPP": "PPPP", "PTI": "PTI", "PkMAP": "PkMAP", "QWP": "QWP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 268, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:32:42.993387", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.358, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.045, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.47, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.285, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.358, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.045, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.511, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.657, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.664, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.285, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.25, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.734, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.433, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.47, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.47, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.285, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.285, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.155, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.155, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.73, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.73, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 268}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6188ff09529a46b594e317a5a78fb11b", "name": "India 2008 local (overnight india-madhya-pradesh-2008-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2008, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Madhya_Pradesh/Madhya_Pradesh_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Independent_AGAR_1": "Independent_AGAR_1", "Independent_AGAR_2": "Independent_AGAR_2", "Independent_ALIRAJPUR_1": "Independent_ALIRAJPUR_1", "Independent_ALIRAJPUR_2": "Independent_ALIRAJPUR_2", "Independent_ALIRAJPUR_3": "Independent_ALIRAJPUR_3", "Independent_ALOTE_1": "Independent_ALOTE_1", "Independent_ALOTE_2": "Independent_ALOTE_2", "Independent_AMARPATAN_1": "Independent_AMARPATAN_1", "Independent_AMARPATAN_10": "Independent_AMARPATAN_10", "Independent_AMARPATAN_2": "Independent_AMARPATAN_2", "Independent_AMARPATAN_3": "Independent_AMARPATAN_3", "Independent_AMARPATAN_4": "Independent_AMARPATAN_4", "Independent_AMARPATAN_5": "Independent_AMARPATAN_5", "Independent_AMARPATAN_6": "Independent_AMARPATAN_6", "Independent_AMARPATAN_7": "Independent_AMARPATAN_7", "Independent_AMARPATAN_8": "Independent_AMARPATAN_8", "Independent_AMARPATAN_9": "Independent_AMARPATAN_9", "Independent_AMARWARA_1": "Independent_AMARWARA_1", "Independent_AMARWARA_2": "Independent_AMARWARA_2", "Independent_AMARWARA_3": "Independent_AMARWARA_3", "Independent_AMARWARA_4": "Independent_AMARWARA_4", "Independent_AMARWARA_5": "Independent_AMARWARA_5", "Independent_AMBAH_1": "Independent_AMBAH_1", "Independent_AMBAH_2": "Independent_AMBAH_2", "Independent_AMBAH_3": "Independent_AMBAH_3", "Independent_AMLA_1": "Independent_AMLA_1", "Independent_AMLA_2": "Independent_AMLA_2", "Independent_AMLA_3": "Independent_AMLA_3", "Independent_AMLA_4": "Independent_AMLA_4", "Independent_AMLA_5": "Independent_AMLA_5", "Independent_AMLA_6": "Independent_AMLA_6", "Independent_ANUPPUR_1": "Independent_ANUPPUR_1", "Independent_ANUPPUR_2": "Independent_ANUPPUR_2", "Independent_ASHOK_NAGAR_1": "Independent_ASHOK_NAGAR_1", "Independent_ASHOK_NAGAR_2": "Independent_ASHOK_NAGAR_2", "Independent_ASHOK_NAGAR_3": "Independent_ASHOK_NAGAR_3", "Independent_ASHOK_NAGAR_4": "Independent_ASHOK_NAGAR_4", "Independent_ASHTA_1": "Independent_ASHTA_1", "Independent_ASHTA_2": "Independent_ASHTA_2", "Independent_ASHTA_3": "Independent_ASHTA_3", "Independent_ATER_1": "Independent_ATER_1", "Independent_ATER_10": "Independent_ATER_10", "Independent_ATER_11": "Independent_ATER_11", "Independent_ATER_2": "Independent_ATER_2", "Independent_ATER_3": "Independent_ATER_3", "Independent_ATER_4": "Independent_ATER_4", "Independent_ATER_5": "Independent_ATER_5", "Independent_ATER_6": "Independent_ATER_6", "Independent_ATER_7": "Independent_ATER_7", "Independent_ATER_8": "Independent_ATER_8", "Independent_ATER_9": "Independent_ATER_9", "Independent_BADNAGAR_1": "Independent_BADNAGAR_1", "Independent_BADNAGAR_2": "Independent_BADNAGAR_2", "Independent_BADNAWAR_1": "Independent_BADNAWAR_1", "Independent_BADWAHA_1": "Independent_BADWAHA_1", "Independent_BADWAHA_2": "Independent_BADWAHA_2", "Independent_BADWARA_1": "Independent_BADWARA_1", "Independent_BADWARA_2": "Independent_BADWARA_2", "Independent_BAGLI_1": "Independent_BAGLI_1", "Independent_BAHORIBAND_1": "Independent_BAHORIBAND_1", "Independent_BAHORIBAND_2": "Independent_BAHORIBAND_2", "Independent_BAHORIBAND_3": "Independent_BAHORIBAND_3", "Independent_BAHORIBAND_4": "Independent_BAHORIBAND_4", "Independent_BAHORIBAND_5": "Independent_BAHORIBAND_5", "Independent_BAHORIBAND_6": "Independent_BAHORIBAND_6", "Independent_BAHORIBAND_7": "Independent_BAHORIBAND_7", "Independent_BAHORIBAND_8": "Independent_BAHORIBAND_8", "Independent_BAIHAR_1": "Independent_BAIHAR_1", "Independent_BAIHAR_2": "Independent_BAIHAR_2", "Independent_BAIHAR_3": "Independent_BAIHAR_3", "Independent_BAIHAR_4": "Independent_BAIHAR_4", "Independent_BAIHAR_5": "Independent_BAIHAR_5", "Independent_BALAGHAT_1": "Independent_BALAGHAT_1", "Independent_BALAGHAT_10": "Independent_BALAGHAT_10", "Independent_BALAGHAT_11": "Independent_BALAGHAT_11", "Independent_BALAGHAT_12": "Independent_BALAGHAT_12", "Independent_BALAGHAT_13": "Independent_BALAGHAT_13", "Independent_BALAGHAT_14": "Independent_BALAGHAT_14", "Independent_BALAGHAT_15": "Independent_BALAGHAT_15", "Independent_BALAGHAT_16": "Independent_BALAGHAT_16", "Independent_BALAGHAT_17": "Independent_BALAGHAT_17", "Independent_BALAGHAT_2": "Independent_BALAGHAT_2", "Independent_BALAGHAT_3": "Independent_BALAGHAT_3", "Independent_BALAGHAT_4": "Independent_BALAGHAT_4", "Independent_BALAGHAT_5": "Independent_BALAGHAT_5", "Independent_BALAGHAT_6": "Independent_BALAGHAT_6", "Independent_BALAGHAT_7": "Independent_BALAGHAT_7", "Independent_BALAGHAT_8": "Independent_BALAGHAT_8", "Independent_BALAGHAT_9": "Independent_BALAGHAT_9", "Independent_BAMORI_1": "Independent_BAMORI_1", "Independent_BAMORI_10": "Independent_BAMORI_10", "Independent_BAMORI_11": "Independent_BAMORI_11", "Independent_BAMORI_12": "Independent_BAMORI_12", "Independent_BAMORI_13": "Independent_BAMORI_13", "Independent_BAMORI_14": "Independent_BAMORI_14", "Independent_BAMORI_2": "Independent_BAMORI_2", "Independent_BAMORI_3": "Independent_BAMORI_3", "Independent_BAMORI_4": "Independent_BAMORI_4", "Independent_BAMORI_5": "Independent_BAMORI_5", "Independent_BAMORI_6": "Independent_BAMORI_6", "Independent_BAMORI_7": "Independent_BAMORI_7", "Independent_BAMORI_8": "Independent_BAMORI_8", "Independent_BAMORI_9": "Independent_BAMORI_9", "Independent_BANDA_1": "Independent_BANDA_1", "Independent_BANDA_2": "Independent_BANDA_2", "Independent_BANDA_3": "Independent_BANDA_3", "Independent_BANDA_4": "Independent_BANDA_4", "Independent_BANDA_5": "Independent_BANDA_5", "Independent_BANDA_6": "Independent_BANDA_6", "Independent_BANDA_7": "Independent_BANDA_7", "Independent_BANDHAVGARH_1": "Independent_BANDHAVGARH_1", "Independent_BANDHAVGARH_2": "Independent_BANDHAVGARH_2", "Independent_BARGHAT_1": "Independent_BARGHAT_1", "Independent_BARGHAT_2": "Independent_BARGHAT_2", "Independent_BARGHAT_3": "Independent_BARGHAT_3", "Independent_BARGHAT_4": "Independent_BARGHAT_4", "Independent_BARGHAT_5": "Independent_BARGHAT_5", "Independent_BARGHAT_6": "Independent_BARGHAT_6", "Independent_BARGI_1": "Independent_BARGI_1", "Independent_BARGI_10": "Independent_BARGI_10", "Independent_BARGI_2": "Independent_BARGI_2", "Independent_BARGI_3": "Independent_BARGI_3", "Independent_BARGI_4": "Independent_BARGI_4", "Independent_BARGI_5": "Independent_BARGI_5", "Independent_BARGI_6": "Independent_BARGI_6", "Independent_BARGI_7": "Independent_BARGI_7", "Independent_BARGI_8": "Independent_BARGI_8", "Independent_BARGI_9": "Independent_BARGI_9", "Independent_BARWANI_S_T_1": "Independent_BARWANI_S_T_1", "Independent_BARWANI_S_T_2": "Independent_BARWANI_S_T_2", "Independent_BASODA_1": "Independent_BASODA_1", "Independent_BASODA_2": "Independent_BASODA_2", "Independent_BASODA_3": "Independent_BASODA_3", "Independent_BASODA_4": "Independent_BASODA_4", "Independent_BEOHARI_1": "Independent_BEOHARI_1", "Independent_BEOHARI_2": "Independent_BEOHARI_2", "Independent_BEOHARI_3": "Independent_BEOHARI_3", "Independent_BEOHARI_4": "Independent_BEOHARI_4", "Independent_BEOHARI_5": "Independent_BEOHARI_5", "Independent_BERASIA_1": "Independent_BERASIA_1", "Independent_BERASIA_2": "Independent_BERASIA_2", "Independent_BERASIA_3": "Independent_BERASIA_3", "Independent_BETUL_1": "Independent_BETUL_1", "Independent_BETUL_2": "Independent_BETUL_2", "Independent_BETUL_3": "Independent_BETUL_3", "Independent_BETUL_4": "Independent_BETUL_4", "Independent_BHAINSDEHI_1": "Independent_BHAINSDEHI_1", "Independent_BHAINSDEHI_2": "Independent_BHAINSDEHI_2", "Independent_BHANDER_1": "Independent_BHANDER_1", "Independent_BHANDER_2": "Independent_BHANDER_2", "Independent_BHANDER_3": "Independent_BHANDER_3", "Independent_BHANDER_4": "Independent_BHANDER_4", "Independent_BHANDER_5": "Independent_BHANDER_5", "Independent_BHANDER_6": "Independent_BHANDER_6", "Independent_BHANDER_7": "Independent_BHANDER_7", "Independent_BHANDER_8": "Independent_BHANDER_8", "Independent_BHIKANGAON_1": "Independent_BHIKANGAON_1", "Independent_BHIND_1": "Independent_BHIND_1", "Independent_BHIND_10": "Independent_BHIND_10", "Independent_BHIND_2": "Independent_BHIND_2", "Independent_BHIND_3": "Independent_BHIND_3", "Independent_BHIND_4": "Independent_BHIND_4", "Independent_BHIND_5": "Independent_BHIND_5", "Independent_BHIND_6": "Independent_BHIND_6", "Independent_BHIND_7": "Independent_BHIND_7", "Independent_BHIND_8": "Independent_BHIND_8", "Independent_BHIND_9": "Independent_BHIND_9", "Independent_BHITRWAR_1": "Independent_BHITRWAR_1", "Independent_BHITRWAR_2": "Independent_BHITRWAR_2", "Independent_BHITRWAR_3": "Independent_BHITRWAR_3", "Independent_BHITRWAR_4": "Independent_BHITRWAR_4", "Independent_BHITRWAR_5": "Independent_BHITRWAR_5", "Independent_BHITRWAR_6": "Independent_BHITRWAR_6", "Independent_BHITRWAR_7": "Independent_BHITRWAR_7", "Independent_BHOJPUR_1": "Independent_BHOJPUR_1", "Independent_BHOJPUR_2": "Independent_BHOJPUR_2", "Independent_BHOJPUR_3": "Independent_BHOJPUR_3", "Independent_BHOJPUR_4": "Independent_BHOJPUR_4", "Independent_BHOPAL_DAKSHINA_PASHCHIM_1": "Independent_BHOPAL_DAKSHINA_PASHCHIM_1", "Independent_BHOPAL_DAKSHINA_PASHCHIM_2": "Independent_BHOPAL_DAKSHINA_PASHCHIM_2", "Independent_BHOPAL_DAKSHINA_PASHCHIM_3": "Independent_BHOPAL_DAKSHINA_PASHCHIM_3", "Independent_BHOPAL_DAKSHINA_PASHCHIM_4": "Independent_BHOPAL_DAKSHINA_PASHCHIM_4", "Independent_BHOPAL_DAKSHINA_PASHCHIM_5": "Independent_BHOPAL_DAKSHINA_PASHCHIM_5", "Independent_BHOPAL_DAKSHINA_PASHCHIM_6": "Independent_BHOPAL_DAKSHINA_PASHCHIM_6", "Independent_BHOPAL_MADHYA_1": "Independent_BHOPAL_MADHYA_1", "Independent_BHOPAL_MADHYA_2": "Independent_BHOPAL_MADHYA_2", "Independent_BHOPAL_MADHYA_3": "Independent_BHOPAL_MADHYA_3", "Independent_BHOPAL_MADHYA_4": "Independent_BHOPAL_MADHYA_4", "Independent_BHOPAL_MADHYA_5": "Independent_BHOPAL_MADHYA_5", "Independent_BHOPAL_UTTAR_1": "Independent_BHOPAL_UTTAR_1", "Independent_BHOPAL_UTTAR_2": "Independent_BHOPAL_UTTAR_2", "Independent_BIAORA_1": "Independent_BIAORA_1", "Independent_BIAORA_2": "Independent_BIAORA_2", "Independent_BIAORA_3": "Independent_BIAORA_3", "Independent_BIAORA_4": "Independent_BIAORA_4", "Independent_BICHHIYA_1": "Independent_BICHHIYA_1", "Independent_BICHHIYA_2": "Independent_BICHHIYA_2", "Independent_BICHHIYA_3": "Independent_BICHHIYA_3", "Independent_BICHHIYA_4": "Independent_BICHHIYA_4", "Independent_BIJAWAR_1": "Independent_BIJAWAR_1", "Independent_BIJAWAR_2": "Independent_BIJAWAR_2", "Independent_BIJAWAR_3": "Independent_BIJAWAR_3", "Independent_BIJAWAR_4": "Independent_BIJAWAR_4", "Independent_BIJAWAR_5": "Independent_BIJAWAR_5", "Independent_BIJAWAR_6": "Independent_BIJAWAR_6", "Independent_BIJAWAR_7": "Independent_BIJAWAR_7", "Independent_BIJAWAR_8": "Independent_BIJAWAR_8", "Independent_BIJAWAR_9": "Independent_BIJAWAR_9", "Independent_BUDHNI_1": "Independent_BUDHNI_1", "Independent_BUDHNI_2": "Independent_BUDHNI_2", "Independent_BUDHNI_3": "Independent_BUDHNI_3", "Independent_BUDHNI_4": "Independent_BUDHNI_4", "Independent_BURHANPUR_1": "Independent_BURHANPUR_1", "Independent_BURHANPUR_2": "Independent_BURHANPUR_2", "Independent_BURHANPUR_3": "Independent_BURHANPUR_3", "Independent_BURHANPUR_4": "Independent_BURHANPUR_4", "Independent_CHACHODA_1": "Independent_CHACHODA_1", "Independent_CHACHODA_2": "Independent_CHACHODA_2", "Independent_CHACHODA_3": "Independent_CHACHODA_3", "Independent_CHACHODA_4": "Independent_CHACHODA_4", "Independent_CHACHODA_5": "Independent_CHACHODA_5", "Independent_CHACHODA_6": "Independent_CHACHODA_6", "Independent_CHANDERI_1": "Independent_CHANDERI_1", "Independent_CHANDERI_2": "Independent_CHANDERI_2", "Independent_CHANDERI_3": "Independent_CHANDERI_3", "Independent_CHANDERI_4": "Independent_CHANDERI_4", "Independent_CHANDERI_5": "Independent_CHANDERI_5", "Independent_CHANDERI_6": "Independent_CHANDERI_6", "Independent_CHANDERI_7": "Independent_CHANDERI_7", "Independent_CHANDERI_8": "Independent_CHANDERI_8", "Independent_CHANDLA_1": "Independent_CHANDLA_1", "Independent_CHANDLA_10": "Independent_CHANDLA_10", "Independent_CHANDLA_11": "Independent_CHANDLA_11", "Independent_CHANDLA_12": "Independent_CHANDLA_12", "Independent_CHANDLA_13": "Independent_CHANDLA_13", "Independent_CHANDLA_14": "Independent_CHANDLA_14", "Independent_CHANDLA_2": "Independent_CHANDLA_2", "Independent_CHANDLA_3": "Independent_CHANDLA_3", "Independent_CHANDLA_4": "Independent_CHANDLA_4", "Independent_CHANDLA_5": "Independent_CHANDLA_5", "Independent_CHANDLA_6": "Independent_CHANDLA_6", "Independent_CHANDLA_7": "Independent_CHANDLA_7", "Independent_CHANDLA_8": "Independent_CHANDLA_8", "Independent_CHANDLA_9": "Independent_CHANDLA_9", "Independent_CHHATARPUR_1": "Independent_CHHATARPUR_1", "Independent_CHHATARPUR_2": "Independent_CHHATARPUR_2", "Independent_CHHATARPUR_3": "Independent_CHHATARPUR_3", "Independent_CHHATARPUR_4": "Independent_CHHATARPUR_4", "Independent_CHHATARPUR_5": "Independent_CHHATARPUR_5", "Independent_CHHATARPUR_6": "Independent_CHHATARPUR_6", "Independent_CHHATARPUR_7": "Independent_CHHATARPUR_7", "Independent_CHHATARPUR_8": "Independent_CHHATARPUR_8", "Independent_CHHATARPUR_9": "Independent_CHHATARPUR_9", "Independent_CHHINDWARA_1": "Independent_CHHINDWARA_1", "Independent_CHHINDWARA_2": "Independent_CHHINDWARA_2", "Independent_CHHINDWARA_3": "Independent_CHHINDWARA_3", "Independent_CHHINDWARA_4": "Independent_CHHINDWARA_4", "Independent_CHHINDWARA_5": "Independent_CHHINDWARA_5", "Independent_CHHINDWARA_6": "Independent_CHHINDWARA_6", "Independent_CHITRAKOOT_1": "Independent_CHITRAKOOT_1", "Independent_CHITRAKOOT_2": "Independent_CHITRAKOOT_2", "Independent_CHITRAKOOT_3": "Independent_CHITRAKOOT_3", "Independent_CHITRAKOOT_4": "Independent_CHITRAKOOT_4", "Independent_CHITRAKOOT_5": "Independent_CHITRAKOOT_5", "Independent_CHITRAKOOT_6": "Independent_CHITRAKOOT_6", "Independent_CHITRAKOOT_7": "Independent_CHITRAKOOT_7", "Independent_CHITRAKOOT_8": "Independent_CHITRAKOOT_8", "Independent_CHITRANGI_1": "Independent_CHITRANGI_1", "Independent_CHITRANGI_2": "Independent_CHITRANGI_2", "Independent_CHURAI_1": "Independent_CHURAI_1", "Independent_CHURAI_2": "Independent_CHURAI_2", "Independent_CHURAI_3": "Independent_CHURAI_3", "Independent_CHURAI_4": "Independent_CHURAI_4", "Independent_CHURAI_5": "Independent_CHURAI_5", "Independent_CHURAI_6": "Independent_CHURAI_6", "Independent_CHURAI_7": "Independent_CHURAI_7", "Independent_CHURAI_8": "Independent_CHURAI_8", "Independent_CHURHAT_1": "Independent_CHURHAT_1", "Independent_CHURHAT_2": "Independent_CHURHAT_2", "Independent_CHURHAT_3": "Independent_CHURHAT_3", "Independent_CHURHAT_4": "Independent_CHURHAT_4", "Independent_CHURHAT_5": "Independent_CHURHAT_5", "Independent_CHURHAT_6": "Independent_CHURHAT_6", "Independent_DABARA_1": "Independent_DABARA_1", "Independent_DABARA_2": "Independent_DABARA_2", "Independent_DABARA_3": "Independent_DABARA_3", "Independent_DABARA_4": "Independent_DABARA_4", "Independent_DABARA_5": "Independent_DABARA_5", "Independent_DABARA_6": "Independent_DABARA_6", "Independent_DABARA_7": "Independent_DABARA_7", "Independent_DABARA_8": "Independent_DABARA_8", "Independent_DABARA_9": "Independent_DABARA_9", "Independent_DAMOH_1": "Independent_DAMOH_1", "Independent_DAMOH_2": "Independent_DAMOH_2", "Independent_DAMOH_3": "Independent_DAMOH_3", "Independent_DAMOH_4": "Independent_DAMOH_4", "Independent_DAMOH_5": "Independent_DAMOH_5", "Independent_DAMOH_6": "Independent_DAMOH_6", "Independent_DATIA_1": "Independent_DATIA_1", "Independent_DATIA_2": "Independent_DATIA_2", "Independent_DATIA_3": "Independent_DATIA_3", "Independent_DATIA_4": "Independent_DATIA_4", "Independent_DATIA_5": "Independent_DATIA_5", "Independent_DATIA_6": "Independent_DATIA_6", "Independent_DATIA_7": "Independent_DATIA_7", "Independent_DATIA_8": "Independent_DATIA_8", "Independent_DATIA_9": "Independent_DATIA_9", "Independent_DEORI_1": "Independent_DEORI_1", "Independent_DEORI_2": "Independent_DEORI_2", "Independent_DEORI_3": "Independent_DEORI_3", "Independent_DEOTALAB_1": "Independent_DEOTALAB_1", "Independent_DEOTALAB_10": "Independent_DEOTALAB_10", "Independent_DEOTALAB_11": "Independent_DEOTALAB_11", "Independent_DEOTALAB_12": "Independent_DEOTALAB_12", "Independent_DEOTALAB_13": "Independent_DEOTALAB_13", "Independent_DEOTALAB_14": "Independent_DEOTALAB_14", "Independent_DEOTALAB_15": "Independent_DEOTALAB_15", "Independent_DEOTALAB_16": "Independent_DEOTALAB_16", "Independent_DEOTALAB_2": "Independent_DEOTALAB_2", "Independent_DEOTALAB_3": "Independent_DEOTALAB_3", "Independent_DEOTALAB_4": "Independent_DEOTALAB_4", "Independent_DEOTALAB_5": "Independent_DEOTALAB_5", "Independent_DEOTALAB_6": "Independent_DEOTALAB_6", "Independent_DEOTALAB_7": "Independent_DEOTALAB_7", "Independent_DEOTALAB_8": "Independent_DEOTALAB_8", "Independent_DEOTALAB_9": "Independent_DEOTALAB_9", "Independent_DEPALPUR_1": "Independent_DEPALPUR_1", "Independent_DEPALPUR_2": "Independent_DEPALPUR_2", "Independent_DEPALPUR_3": "Independent_DEPALPUR_3", "Independent_DEPALPUR_4": "Independent_DEPALPUR_4", "Independent_DEVSAR_1": "Independent_DEVSAR_1", "Independent_DEVSAR_2": "Independent_DEVSAR_2", "Independent_DEWAS_1": "Independent_DEWAS_1", "Independent_DEWAS_2": "Independent_DEWAS_2", "Independent_DEWAS_3": "Independent_DEWAS_3", "Independent_DHARAMPURI_1": "Independent_DHARAMPURI_1", "Independent_DHARAMPURI_2": "Independent_DHARAMPURI_2", "Independent_DHARAMPURI_3": "Independent_DHARAMPURI_3", "Independent_DHARAMPURI_4": "Independent_DHARAMPURI_4", "Independent_DHARAMPURI_5": "Independent_DHARAMPURI_5", "Independent_DHAR_1": "Independent_DHAR_1", "Independent_DHAR_2": "Independent_DHAR_2", "Independent_DHAR_3": "Independent_DHAR_3", "Independent_DHAR_4": "Independent_DHAR_4", "Independent_DHAR_5": "Independent_DHAR_5", "Independent_DHAR_6": "Independent_DHAR_6", "Independent_DHAR_7": "Independent_DHAR_7", "Independent_DHOUHANI_1": "Independent_DHOUHANI_1", "Independent_DHOUHANI_2": "Independent_DHOUHANI_2", "Independent_DHOUHANI_3": "Independent_DHOUHANI_3", "Independent_DIMANI_1": "Independent_DIMANI_1", "Independent_DIMANI_2": "Independent_DIMANI_2", "Independent_DIMANI_3": "Independent_DIMANI_3", "Independent_DIMANI_4": "Independent_DIMANI_4", "Independent_DIMANI_5": "Independent_DIMANI_5", "Independent_DIMANI_6": "Independent_DIMANI_6", "Independent_DIMANI_7": "Independent_DIMANI_7", "Independent_DIMANI_8": "Independent_DIMANI_8", "Independent_DIMANI_9": "Independent_DIMANI_9", "Independent_DINDORI_1": "Independent_DINDORI_1", "Independent_DR_AMBEDKAR_NAGAR_MHOW_1": "Independent_DR_AMBEDKAR_NAGAR_MHOW_1", "Independent_DR_AMBEDKAR_NAGAR_MHOW_2": "Independent_DR_AMBEDKAR_NAGAR_MHOW_2", "Independent_DR_AMBEDKAR_NAGAR_MHOW_3": "Independent_DR_AMBEDKAR_NAGAR_MHOW_3", "Independent_DR_AMBEDKAR_NAGAR_MHOW_4": "Independent_DR_AMBEDKAR_NAGAR_MHOW_4", "Independent_DR_AMBEDKAR_NAGAR_MHOW_5": "Independent_DR_AMBEDKAR_NAGAR_MHOW_5", "Independent_GADARWARA_1": "Independent_GADARWARA_1", "Independent_GADARWARA_2": "Independent_GADARWARA_2", "Independent_GANDHWANI_1": "Independent_GANDHWANI_1", "Independent_GANDHWANI_2": "Independent_GANDHWANI_2", "Independent_GANDHWANI_3": "Independent_GANDHWANI_3", "Independent_GANDHWANI_4": "Independent_GANDHWANI_4", "Independent_GAROTH_1": "Independent_GAROTH_1", "Independent_GAROTH_2": "Independent_GAROTH_2", "Independent_GAROTH_3": "Independent_GAROTH_3", "Independent_GHATIYA_1": "Independent_GHATIYA_1", "Independent_GHATIYA_2": "Independent_GHATIYA_2", "Independent_GHATIYA_3": "Independent_GHATIYA_3", "Independent_GHODADONGRI_1": "Independent_GHODADONGRI_1", "Independent_GOHAD_1": "Independent_GOHAD_1", "Independent_GOHAD_2": "Independent_GOHAD_2", "Independent_GOHAD_3": "Independent_GOHAD_3", "Independent_GOHAD_4": "Independent_GOHAD_4", "Independent_GOHAD_5": "Independent_GOHAD_5", "Independent_GOHAD_6": "Independent_GOHAD_6", "Independent_GOHAD_7": "Independent_GOHAD_7", "Independent_GOTEGAON_1": "Independent_GOTEGAON_1", "Independent_GOTEGAON_2": "Independent_GOTEGAON_2", "Independent_GOVINDPURA_1": "Independent_GOVINDPURA_1", "Independent_GOVINDPURA_2": "Independent_GOVINDPURA_2", "Independent_GOVINDPURA_3": "Independent_GOVINDPURA_3", "Independent_GOVINDPURA_4": "Independent_GOVINDPURA_4", "Independent_GUNA_1": "Independent_GUNA_1", "Independent_GUNA_10": "Independent_GUNA_10", "Independent_GUNA_2": "Independent_GUNA_2", "Independent_GUNA_3": "Independent_GUNA_3", "Independent_GUNA_4": "Independent_GUNA_4", "Independent_GUNA_5": "Independent_GUNA_5", "Independent_GUNA_6": "Independent_GUNA_6", "Independent_GUNA_7": "Independent_GUNA_7", "Independent_GUNA_8": "Independent_GUNA_8", "Independent_GUNA_9": "Independent_GUNA_9", "Independent_GURH_1": "Independent_GURH_1", "Independent_GURH_2": "Independent_GURH_2", "Independent_GURH_3": "Independent_GURH_3", "Independent_GURH_4": "Independent_GURH_4", "Independent_GURH_5": "Independent_GURH_5", "Independent_GURH_6": "Independent_GURH_6", "Independent_GURH_7": "Independent_GURH_7", "Independent_GWALIOR_1": "Independent_GWALIOR_1", "Independent_GWALIOR_2": "Independent_GWALIOR_2", "Independent_GWALIOR_3": "Independent_GWALIOR_3", "Independent_GWALIOR_4": "Independent_GWALIOR_4", "Independent_GWALIOR_5": "Independent_GWALIOR_5", "Independent_GWALIOR_6": "Independent_GWALIOR_6", "Independent_GWALIOR_7": "Independent_GWALIOR_7", "Independent_GWALIOR_8": "Independent_GWALIOR_8", "Independent_GWALIOR_EAST_1": "Independent_GWALIOR_EAST_1", "Independent_GWALIOR_EAST_2": "Independent_GWALIOR_EAST_2", "Independent_GWALIOR_EAST_3": "Independent_GWALIOR_EAST_3", "Independent_GWALIOR_EAST_4": "Independent_GWALIOR_EAST_4", "Independent_GWALIOR_RURAL_1": "Independent_GWALIOR_RURAL_1", "Independent_GWALIOR_SOUTH_1": "Independent_GWALIOR_SOUTH_1", "Independent_GWALIOR_SOUTH_2": "Independent_GWALIOR_SOUTH_2", "Independent_GWALIOR_SOUTH_3": "Independent_GWALIOR_SOUTH_3", "Independent_GWALIOR_SOUTH_4": "Independent_GWALIOR_SOUTH_4", "Independent_GWALIOR_SOUTH_5": "Independent_GWALIOR_SOUTH_5", "Independent_GWALIOR_SOUTH_6": "Independent_GWALIOR_SOUTH_6", "Independent_GWALIOR_SOUTH_7": "Independent_GWALIOR_SOUTH_7", "Independent_GWALIOR_SOUTH_8": "Independent_GWALIOR_SOUTH_8", "Independent_HARDA_1": "Independent_HARDA_1", "Independent_HARDA_2": "Independent_HARDA_2", "Independent_HARDA_3": "Independent_HARDA_3", "Independent_HARDA_4": "Independent_HARDA_4", "Independent_HARDA_5": "Independent_HARDA_5", "Independent_HARDA_6": "Independent_HARDA_6", "Independent_HARDA_7": "Independent_HARDA_7", "Independent_HARDA_8": "Independent_HARDA_8", "Independent_HARSUD_1": "Independent_HARSUD_1", "Independent_HATPIPLIYA_1": "Independent_HATPIPLIYA_1", "Independent_HATPIPLIYA_2": "Independent_HATPIPLIYA_2", "Independent_HATPIPLIYA_3": "Independent_HATPIPLIYA_3", "Independent_HATTA_1": "Independent_HATTA_1", "Independent_HATTA_2": "Independent_HATTA_2", "Independent_HATTA_3": "Independent_HATTA_3", "Independent_HOSHANGABAD_1": "Independent_HOSHANGABAD_1", "Independent_HOSHANGABAD_2": "Independent_HOSHANGABAD_2", "Independent_HOSHANGABAD_3": "Independent_HOSHANGABAD_3", "Independent_HUZUR_1": "Independent_HUZUR_1", "Independent_HUZUR_2": "Independent_HUZUR_2", "Independent_HUZUR_3": "Independent_HUZUR_3", "Independent_HUZUR_4": "Independent_HUZUR_4", "Independent_HUZUR_5": "Independent_HUZUR_5", "Independent_HUZUR_6": "Independent_HUZUR_6", "Independent_HUZUR_7": "Independent_HUZUR_7", "Independent_ICHHAWAR_1": "Independent_ICHHAWAR_1", "Independent_ICHHAWAR_10": "Independent_ICHHAWAR_10", "Independent_ICHHAWAR_2": "Independent_ICHHAWAR_2", "Independent_ICHHAWAR_3": "Independent_ICHHAWAR_3", "Independent_ICHHAWAR_4": "Independent_ICHHAWAR_4", "Independent_ICHHAWAR_5": "Independent_ICHHAWAR_5", "Independent_ICHHAWAR_6": "Independent_ICHHAWAR_6", "Independent_ICHHAWAR_7": "Independent_ICHHAWAR_7", "Independent_ICHHAWAR_8": "Independent_ICHHAWAR_8", "Independent_ICHHAWAR_9": "Independent_ICHHAWAR_9", "Independent_INDORE_1_1": "Independent_INDORE_1_1", "Independent_INDORE_1_2": "Independent_INDORE_1_2", "Independent_INDORE_1_3": "Independent_INDORE_1_3", "Independent_INDORE_1_4": "Independent_INDORE_1_4", "Independent_INDORE_2_1": "Independent_INDORE_2_1", "Independent_INDORE_2_2": "Independent_INDORE_2_2", "Independent_INDORE_2_3": "Independent_INDORE_2_3", "Independent_INDORE_2_4": "Independent_INDORE_2_4", "Independent_INDORE_3_1": "Independent_INDORE_3_1", "Independent_INDORE_3_2": "Independent_INDORE_3_2", "Independent_INDORE_4_1": "Independent_INDORE_4_1", "Independent_INDORE_4_2": "Independent_INDORE_4_2", "Independent_INDORE_4_3": "Independent_INDORE_4_3", "Independent_INDORE_4_4": "Independent_INDORE_4_4", "Independent_INDORE_4_5": "Independent_INDORE_4_5", "Independent_INDORE_4_6": "Independent_INDORE_4_6", "Independent_INDORE_5_1": "Independent_INDORE_5_1", "Independent_INDORE_5_2": "Independent_INDORE_5_2", "Independent_INDORE_5_3": "Independent_INDORE_5_3", "Independent_JABALPUR_CANTT_1": "Independent_JABALPUR_CANTT_1", "Independent_JABALPUR_CANTT_2": "Independent_JABALPUR_CANTT_2", "Independent_JABALPUR_CANTT_3": "Independent_JABALPUR_CANTT_3", "Independent_JABALPUR_CANTT_4": "Independent_JABALPUR_CANTT_4", "Independent_JABALPUR_EAST_1": "Independent_JABALPUR_EAST_1", "Independent_JABALPUR_EAST_2": "Independent_JABALPUR_EAST_2", "Independent_JABALPUR_EAST_3": "Independent_JABALPUR_EAST_3", "Independent_JABALPUR_NORTH_1": "Independent_JABALPUR_NORTH_1", "Independent_JABALPUR_NORTH_2": "Independent_JABALPUR_NORTH_2", "Independent_JABALPUR_NORTH_3": "Independent_JABALPUR_NORTH_3", "Independent_JABALPUR_NORTH_4": "Independent_JABALPUR_NORTH_4", "Independent_JABALPUR_NORTH_5": "Independent_JABALPUR_NORTH_5", "Independent_JABALPUR_WEST_1": "Independent_JABALPUR_WEST_1", "Independent_JABALPUR_WEST_2": "Independent_JABALPUR_WEST_2", "Independent_JABALPUR_WEST_3": "Independent_JABALPUR_WEST_3", "Independent_JABALPUR_WEST_4": "Independent_JABALPUR_WEST_4", "Independent_JABERA_1": "Independent_JABERA_1", "Independent_JABERA_2": "Independent_JABERA_2", "Independent_JABERA_3": "Independent_JABERA_3", "Independent_JABERA_4": "Independent_JABERA_4", "Independent_JAISINGHNAGAR_1": "Independent_JAISINGHNAGAR_1", "Independent_JAISINGHNAGAR_2": "Independent_JAISINGHNAGAR_2", "Independent_JAISINGHNAGAR_3": "Independent_JAISINGHNAGAR_3", "Independent_JAISINGHNAGAR_4": "Independent_JAISINGHNAGAR_4", "Independent_JAISINGHNAGAR_5": "Independent_JAISINGHNAGAR_5", "Independent_JAITPUR_1": "Independent_JAITPUR_1", "Independent_JAITPUR_2": "Independent_JAITPUR_2", "Independent_JAITPUR_3": "Independent_JAITPUR_3", "Independent_JAORA_1": "Independent_JAORA_1", "Independent_JAORA_2": "Independent_JAORA_2", "Independent_JAORA_3": "Independent_JAORA_3", "Independent_JATARA_1": "Independent_JATARA_1", "Independent_JATARA_10": "Independent_JATARA_10", "Independent_JATARA_11": "Independent_JATARA_11", "Independent_JATARA_12": "Independent_JATARA_12", "Independent_JATARA_13": "Independent_JATARA_13", "Independent_JATARA_14": "Independent_JATARA_14", "Independent_JATARA_15": "Independent_JATARA_15", "Independent_JATARA_2": "Independent_JATARA_2", "Independent_JATARA_3": "Independent_JATARA_3", "Independent_JATARA_4": "Independent_JATARA_4", "Independent_JATARA_5": "Independent_JATARA_5", "Independent_JATARA_6": "Independent_JATARA_6", "Independent_JATARA_7": "Independent_JATARA_7", "Independent_JATARA_8": "Independent_JATARA_8", "Independent_JATARA_9": "Independent_JATARA_9", "Independent_JAURA_1": "Independent_JAURA_1", "Independent_JAURA_10": "Independent_JAURA_10", "Independent_JAURA_2": "Independent_JAURA_2", "Independent_JAURA_3": "Independent_JAURA_3", "Independent_JAURA_4": "Independent_JAURA_4", "Independent_JAURA_5": "Independent_JAURA_5", "Independent_JAURA_6": "Independent_JAURA_6", "Independent_JAURA_7": "Independent_JAURA_7", "Independent_JAURA_8": "Independent_JAURA_8", "Independent_JAURA_9": "Independent_JAURA_9", "Independent_JAWAD_1": "Independent_JAWAD_1", "Independent_JHABUA_1": "Independent_JHABUA_1", "Independent_JHABUA_2": "Independent_JHABUA_2", "Independent_JHABUA_3": "Independent_JHABUA_3", "Independent_JHABUA_4": "Independent_JHABUA_4", "Independent_JHABUA_5": "Independent_JHABUA_5", "Independent_JHABUA_6": "Independent_JHABUA_6", "Independent_JOBAT_1": "Independent_JOBAT_1", "Independent_JUNNARDEO_1": "Independent_JUNNARDEO_1", "Independent_JUNNARDEO_2": "Independent_JUNNARDEO_2", "Independent_JUNNARDEO_3": "Independent_JUNNARDEO_3", "Independent_KALAPIPAL_1": "Independent_KALAPIPAL_1", "Independent_KALAPIPAL_2": "Independent_KALAPIPAL_2", "Independent_KALAPIPAL_3": "Independent_KALAPIPAL_3", "Independent_KALAPIPAL_4": "Independent_KALAPIPAL_4", "Independent_KALAPIPAL_5": "Independent_KALAPIPAL_5", "Independent_KALAPIPAL_6": "Independent_KALAPIPAL_6", "Independent_KARERA_1": "Independent_KARERA_1", "Independent_KARERA_10": "Independent_KARERA_10", "Independent_KARERA_11": "Independent_KARERA_11", "Independent_KARERA_12": "Independent_KARERA_12", "Independent_KARERA_13": "Independent_KARERA_13", "Independent_KARERA_14": "Independent_KARERA_14", "Independent_KARERA_2": "Independent_KARERA_2", "Independent_KARERA_3": "Independent_KARERA_3", "Independent_KARERA_4": "Independent_KARERA_4", "Independent_KARERA_5": "Independent_KARERA_5", "Independent_KARERA_6": "Independent_KARERA_6", "Independent_KARERA_7": "Independent_KARERA_7", "Independent_KARERA_8": "Independent_KARERA_8", "Independent_KARERA_9": "Independent_KARERA_9", "Independent_KASRAWAD_1": "Independent_KASRAWAD_1", "Independent_KASRAWAD_2": "Independent_KASRAWAD_2", "Independent_KASRAWAD_3": "Independent_KASRAWAD_3", "Independent_KASRAWAD_4": "Independent_KASRAWAD_4", "Independent_KASRAWAD_5": "Independent_KASRAWAD_5", "Independent_KASRAWAD_6": "Independent_KASRAWAD_6", "Independent_KASRAWAD_7": "Independent_KASRAWAD_7", "Independent_KASRAWAD_8": "Independent_KASRAWAD_8", "Independent_KATANGI_1": "Independent_KATANGI_1", "Independent_KATANGI_2": "Independent_KATANGI_2", "Independent_KATANGI_3": "Independent_KATANGI_3", "Independent_KATANGI_4": "Independent_KATANGI_4", "Independent_KATANGI_5": "Independent_KATANGI_5", "Independent_KEOLARI_1": "Independent_KEOLARI_1", "Independent_KEOLARI_2": "Independent_KEOLARI_2", "Independent_KEOLARI_3": "Independent_KEOLARI_3", "Independent_KEOLARI_4": "Independent_KEOLARI_4", "Independent_KEOLARI_5": "Independent_KEOLARI_5", "Independent_KEOLARI_6": "Independent_KEOLARI_6", "Independent_KEOLARI_7": "Independent_KEOLARI_7", "Independent_KEOLARI_8": "Independent_KEOLARI_8", "Independent_KEOLARI_9": "Independent_KEOLARI_9", "Independent_KHANDWA_1": "Independent_KHANDWA_1", "Independent_KHANDWA_2": "Independent_KHANDWA_2", "Independent_KHARGAPUR_1": "Independent_KHARGAPUR_1", "Independent_KHARGAPUR_10": "Independent_KHARGAPUR_10", "Independent_KHARGAPUR_11": "Independent_KHARGAPUR_11", "Independent_KHARGAPUR_12": "Independent_KHARGAPUR_12", "Independent_KHARGAPUR_13": "Independent_KHARGAPUR_13", "Independent_KHARGAPUR_14": "Independent_KHARGAPUR_14", "Independent_KHARGAPUR_15": "Independent_KHARGAPUR_15", "Independent_KHARGAPUR_16": "Independent_KHARGAPUR_16", "Independent_KHARGAPUR_17": "Independent_KHARGAPUR_17", "Independent_KHARGAPUR_18": "Independent_KHARGAPUR_18", "Independent_KHARGAPUR_19": "Independent_KHARGAPUR_19", "Independent_KHARGAPUR_2": "Independent_KHARGAPUR_2", "Independent_KHARGAPUR_20": "Independent_KHARGAPUR_20", "Independent_KHARGAPUR_21": "Independent_KHARGAPUR_21", "Independent_KHARGAPUR_3": "Independent_KHARGAPUR_3", "Independent_KHARGAPUR_4": "Independent_KHARGAPUR_4", "Independent_KHARGAPUR_5": "Independent_KHARGAPUR_5", "Independent_KHARGAPUR_6": "Independent_KHARGAPUR_6", "Independent_KHARGAPUR_7": "Independent_KHARGAPUR_7", "Independent_KHARGAPUR_8": "Independent_KHARGAPUR_8", "Independent_KHARGAPUR_9": "Independent_KHARGAPUR_9", "Independent_KHARGONE_1": "Independent_KHARGONE_1", "Independent_KHARGONE_2": "Independent_KHARGONE_2", "Independent_KHARGONE_3": "Independent_KHARGONE_3", "Independent_KHARGONE_4": "Independent_KHARGONE_4", "Independent_KHATEGAON_1": "Independent_KHATEGAON_1", "Independent_KHILCHIPUR_1": "Independent_KHILCHIPUR_1", "Independent_KHILCHIPUR_2": "Independent_KHILCHIPUR_2", "Independent_KHILCHIPUR_3": "Independent_KHILCHIPUR_3", "Independent_KHILCHIPUR_4": "Independent_KHILCHIPUR_4", "Independent_KHURAI_1": "Independent_KHURAI_1", "Independent_KHURAI_2": "Independent_KHURAI_2", "Independent_KHURAI_3": "Independent_KHURAI_3", "Independent_KHURAI_4": "Independent_KHURAI_4", "Independent_KHURAI_5": "Independent_KHURAI_5", "Independent_KHURAI_6": "Independent_KHURAI_6", "Independent_KOLARAS_1": "Independent_KOLARAS_1", "Independent_KOLARAS_10": "Independent_KOLARAS_10", "Independent_KOLARAS_11": "Independent_KOLARAS_11", "Independent_KOLARAS_12": "Independent_KOLARAS_12", "Independent_KOLARAS_13": "Independent_KOLARAS_13", "Independent_KOLARAS_14": "Independent_KOLARAS_14", "Independent_KOLARAS_15": "Independent_KOLARAS_15", "Independent_KOLARAS_16": "Independent_KOLARAS_16", "Independent_KOLARAS_17": "Independent_KOLARAS_17", "Independent_KOLARAS_18": "Independent_KOLARAS_18", "Independent_KOLARAS_19": "Independent_KOLARAS_19", "Independent_KOLARAS_2": "Independent_KOLARAS_2", "Independent_KOLARAS_20": "Independent_KOLARAS_20", "Independent_KOLARAS_21": "Independent_KOLARAS_21", "Independent_KOLARAS_22": "Independent_KOLARAS_22", "Independent_KOLARAS_23": "Independent_KOLARAS_23", "Independent_KOLARAS_24": "Independent_KOLARAS_24", "Independent_KOLARAS_25": "Independent_KOLARAS_25", "Independent_KOLARAS_26": "Independent_KOLARAS_26", "Independent_KOLARAS_3": "Independent_KOLARAS_3", "Independent_KOLARAS_4": "Independent_KOLARAS_4", "Independent_KOLARAS_5": "Independent_KOLARAS_5", "Independent_KOLARAS_6": "Independent_KOLARAS_6", "Independent_KOLARAS_7": "Independent_KOLARAS_7", "Independent_KOLARAS_8": "Independent_KOLARAS_8", "Independent_KOLARAS_9": "Independent_KOLARAS_9", "Independent_KOTAMA_1": "Independent_KOTAMA_1", "Independent_KOTAMA_10": "Independent_KOTAMA_10", "Independent_KOTAMA_11": "Independent_KOTAMA_11", "Independent_KOTAMA_12": "Independent_KOTAMA_12", "Independent_KOTAMA_13": "Independent_KOTAMA_13", "Independent_KOTAMA_14": "Independent_KOTAMA_14", "Independent_KOTAMA_2": "Independent_KOTAMA_2", "Independent_KOTAMA_3": "Independent_KOTAMA_3", "Independent_KOTAMA_4": "Independent_KOTAMA_4", "Independent_KOTAMA_5": "Independent_KOTAMA_5", "Independent_KOTAMA_6": "Independent_KOTAMA_6", "Independent_KOTAMA_7": "Independent_KOTAMA_7", "Independent_KOTAMA_8": "Independent_KOTAMA_8", "Independent_KOTAMA_9": "Independent_KOTAMA_9", "Independent_KUKSHI_1": "Independent_KUKSHI_1", "Independent_LAHAR_1": "Independent_LAHAR_1", "Independent_LAHAR_10": "Independent_LAHAR_10", "Independent_LAHAR_11": "Independent_LAHAR_11", "Independent_LAHAR_12": "Independent_LAHAR_12", "Independent_LAHAR_13": "Independent_LAHAR_13", "Independent_LAHAR_14": "Independent_LAHAR_14", "Independent_LAHAR_15": "Independent_LAHAR_15", "Independent_LAHAR_16": "Independent_LAHAR_16", "Independent_LAHAR_17": "Independent_LAHAR_17", "Independent_LAHAR_18": "Independent_LAHAR_18", "Independent_LAHAR_19": "Independent_LAHAR_19", "Independent_LAHAR_2": "Independent_LAHAR_2", "Independent_LAHAR_20": "Independent_LAHAR_20", "Independent_LAHAR_3": "Independent_LAHAR_3", "Independent_LAHAR_4": "Independent_LAHAR_4", "Independent_LAHAR_5": "Independent_LAHAR_5", "Independent_LAHAR_6": "Independent_LAHAR_6", "Independent_LAHAR_7": "Independent_LAHAR_7", "Independent_LAHAR_8": "Independent_LAHAR_8", "Independent_LAHAR_9": "Independent_LAHAR_9", "Independent_LAKHANADON_1": "Independent_LAKHANADON_1", "Independent_LAKHANADON_2": "Independent_LAKHANADON_2", "Independent_LAKHANADON_3": "Independent_LAKHANADON_3", "Independent_LAKHANADON_4": "Independent_LAKHANADON_4", "Independent_LAKHANADON_5": "Independent_LAKHANADON_5", "Independent_LAKHANADON_6": "Independent_LAKHANADON_6", "Independent_LAKHANADON_7": "Independent_LAKHANADON_7", "Independent_LAKHANADON_8": "Independent_LAKHANADON_8", "Independent_LANJI_1": "Independent_LANJI_1", "Independent_LANJI_2": "Independent_LANJI_2", "Independent_LANJI_3": "Independent_LANJI_3", "Independent_LANJI_4": "Independent_LANJI_4", "Independent_LANJI_5": "Independent_LANJI_5", "Independent_LANJI_6": "Independent_LANJI_6", "Independent_LANJI_7": "Independent_LANJI_7", "Independent_LANJI_8": "Independent_LANJI_8", "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_1": "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_1", "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_10": "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_10", "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_11": "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_11", "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_12": "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_12", "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_13": "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_13", "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_2": "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_2", "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_3": "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_3", "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_4": "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_4", "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_5": "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_5", "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_6": "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_6", "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_7": "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_7", "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_8": "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_8", "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_9": "Independent_MAHARAJPUR_9", "Independent_MAHESHWAR_1": "Independent_MAHESHWAR_1", "Independent_MAHESHWAR_2": "Independent_MAHESHWAR_2", "Independent_MAHESHWAR_3": "Independent_MAHESHWAR_3", "Independent_MAHESHWAR_4": "Independent_MAHESHWAR_4", "Independent_MAHESHWAR_5": "Independent_MAHESHWAR_5", "Independent_MAHIDPUR_1": "Independent_MAHIDPUR_1", "Independent_MAHIDPUR_2": "Independent_MAHIDPUR_2", "Independent_MAHIDPUR_3": "Independent_MAHIDPUR_3", "Independent_MAHIDPUR_4": "Independent_MAHIDPUR_4", "Independent_MAHIDPUR_5": "Independent_MAHIDPUR_5", "Independent_MAIHAR_1": "Independent_MAIHAR_1", "Independent_MAIHAR_10": "Independent_MAIHAR_10", "Independent_MAIHAR_11": "Independent_MAIHAR_11", "Independent_MAIHAR_12": "Independent_MAIHAR_12", "Independent_MAIHAR_2": "Independent_MAIHAR_2", "Independent_MAIHAR_3": "Independent_MAIHAR_3", "Independent_MAIHAR_4": "Independent_MAIHAR_4", "Independent_MAIHAR_5": "Independent_MAIHAR_5", "Independent_MAIHAR_6": "Independent_MAIHAR_6", "Independent_MAIHAR_7": "Independent_MAIHAR_7", "Independent_MAIHAR_8": "Independent_MAIHAR_8", "Independent_MAIHAR_9": "Independent_MAIHAR_9", "Independent_MALHARA_1": "Independent_MALHARA_1", "Independent_MALHARA_10": "Independent_MALHARA_10", "Independent_MALHARA_11": "Independent_MALHARA_11", "Independent_MALHARA_12": "Independent_MALHARA_12", "Independent_MALHARA_13": "Independent_MALHARA_13", "Independent_MALHARA_14": "Independent_MALHARA_14", "Independent_MALHARA_15": "Independent_MALHARA_15", "Independent_MALHARA_16": "Independent_MALHARA_16", "Independent_MALHARA_2": "Independent_MALHARA_2", "Independent_MALHARA_3": "Independent_MALHARA_3", "Independent_MALHARA_4": "Independent_MALHARA_4", "Independent_MALHARA_5": "Independent_MALHARA_5", "Independent_MALHARA_6": "Independent_MALHARA_6", "Independent_MALHARA_7": "Independent_MALHARA_7", "Independent_MALHARA_8": "Independent_MALHARA_8", "Independent_MALHARA_9": "Independent_MALHARA_9", "Independent_MALHARGARH_1": "Independent_MALHARGARH_1", "Independent_MALHARGARH_2": "Independent_MALHARGARH_2", "Independent_MALHARGARH_3": "Independent_MALHARGARH_3", "Independent_MANAPUR_1": "Independent_MANAPUR_1", "Independent_MANAPUR_2": "Independent_MANAPUR_2", "Independent_MANAPUR_3": "Independent_MANAPUR_3", "Independent_MANAWAR_1": "Independent_MANAWAR_1", "Independent_MANDHATA_1": "Independent_MANDHATA_1", "Independent_MANDHATA_2": "Independent_MANDHATA_2", "Independent_MANDHATA_3": "Independent_MANDHATA_3", "Independent_MANDLA_1": "Independent_MANDLA_1", "Independent_MANDLA_2": "Independent_MANDLA_2", "Independent_MANDLA_3": "Independent_MANDLA_3", "Independent_MANDLA_4": "Independent_MANDLA_4", "Independent_MANDLA_5": "Independent_MANDLA_5", "Independent_MANDLA_6": "Independent_MANDLA_6", "Independent_MANDSOUR_1": "Independent_MANDSOUR_1", "Independent_MANGAWAN_1": "Independent_MANGAWAN_1", "Independent_MANGAWAN_2": "Independent_MANGAWAN_2", "Independent_MANGAWAN_3": "Independent_MANGAWAN_3", "Independent_MANGAWAN_4": "Independent_MANGAWAN_4", "Independent_MANGAWAN_5": "Independent_MANGAWAN_5", "Independent_MANGAWAN_6": "Independent_MANGAWAN_6", "Independent_MANGAWAN_7": "Independent_MANGAWAN_7", "Independent_MANGAWAN_8": "Independent_MANGAWAN_8", "Independent_MAUGANJ_1": "Independent_MAUGANJ_1", "Independent_MAUGANJ_2": "Independent_MAUGANJ_2", "Independent_MAUGANJ_3": "Independent_MAUGANJ_3", "Independent_MAUGANJ_4": "Independent_MAUGANJ_4", "Independent_MAUGANJ_5": "Independent_MAUGANJ_5", "Independent_MAUGANJ_6": "Independent_MAUGANJ_6", "Independent_MAUGANJ_7": "Independent_MAUGANJ_7", "Independent_MAUGANJ_8": "Independent_MAUGANJ_8", "Independent_MEHGAON_1": "Independent_MEHGAON_1", "Independent_MEHGAON_10": "Independent_MEHGAON_10", "Independent_MEHGAON_11": "Independent_MEHGAON_11", "Independent_MEHGAON_12": "Independent_MEHGAON_12", "Independent_MEHGAON_13": "Independent_MEHGAON_13", "Independent_MEHGAON_14": "Independent_MEHGAON_14", "Independent_MEHGAON_15": "Independent_MEHGAON_15", "Independent_MEHGAON_2": "Independent_MEHGAON_2", "Independent_MEHGAON_3": "Independent_MEHGAON_3", "Independent_MEHGAON_4": "Independent_MEHGAON_4", "Independent_MEHGAON_5": "Independent_MEHGAON_5", "Independent_MEHGAON_6": "Independent_MEHGAON_6", "Independent_MEHGAON_7": "Independent_MEHGAON_7", "Independent_MEHGAON_8": "Independent_MEHGAON_8", "Independent_MEHGAON_9": "Independent_MEHGAON_9", "Independent_MORENA_1": "Independent_MORENA_1", "Independent_MORENA_2": "Independent_MORENA_2", "Independent_MORENA_3": "Independent_MORENA_3", "Independent_MORENA_4": "Independent_MORENA_4", "Independent_MORENA_5": "Independent_MORENA_5", "Independent_MORENA_6": "Independent_MORENA_6", "Independent_MORENA_7": "Independent_MORENA_7", "Independent_MORENA_8": "Independent_MORENA_8", "Independent_MORENA_9": "Independent_MORENA_9", "Independent_MUDWARA_1": "Independent_MUDWARA_1", "Independent_MUDWARA_2": "Independent_MUDWARA_2", "Independent_MUDWARA_3": "Independent_MUDWARA_3", "Independent_MUDWARA_4": "Independent_MUDWARA_4", "Independent_MUDWARA_5": "Independent_MUDWARA_5", "Independent_MUDWARA_6": "Independent_MUDWARA_6", "Independent_MUDWARA_7": "Independent_MUDWARA_7", "Independent_MUDWARA_8": "Independent_MUDWARA_8", "Independent_MULTAI_1": "Independent_MULTAI_1", "Independent_MULTAI_2": "Independent_MULTAI_2", "Independent_MULTAI_3": "Independent_MULTAI_3", "Independent_MULTAI_4": "Independent_MULTAI_4", "Independent_MULTAI_5": "Independent_MULTAI_5", "Independent_MULTAI_6": "Independent_MULTAI_6", "Independent_MUNGAOLI_1": "Independent_MUNGAOLI_1", "Independent_MUNGAOLI_2": "Independent_MUNGAOLI_2", "Independent_MUNGAOLI_3": "Independent_MUNGAOLI_3", "Independent_MUNGAOLI_4": "Independent_MUNGAOLI_4", "Independent_NAGADA_KHACHAROD_1": "Independent_NAGADA_KHACHAROD_1", "Independent_NAGADA_KHACHAROD_2": "Independent_NAGADA_KHACHAROD_2", "Independent_NAGADA_KHACHAROD_3": "Independent_NAGADA_KHACHAROD_3", "Independent_NAGOD_1": "Independent_NAGOD_1", "Independent_NAGOD_2": "Independent_NAGOD_2", "Independent_NAGOD_3": "Independent_NAGOD_3", "Independent_NAGOD_4": "Independent_NAGOD_4", "Independent_NAGOD_5": "Independent_NAGOD_5", "Independent_NARELA_1": "Independent_NARELA_1", "Independent_NARELA_2": "Independent_NARELA_2", "Independent_NARELA_3": "Independent_NARELA_3", "Independent_NARELA_4": "Independent_NARELA_4", "Independent_NARELA_5": "Independent_NARELA_5", "Independent_NARSINGHGARH_1": "Independent_NARSINGHGARH_1", "Independent_NARSINGHGARH_2": "Independent_NARSINGHGARH_2", "Independent_NARSINGHGARH_3": "Independent_NARSINGHGARH_3", "Independent_NARSINGPUR_1": "Independent_NARSINGPUR_1", "Independent_NARSINGPUR_2": "Independent_NARSINGPUR_2", "Independent_NARYAWALI_1": "Independent_NARYAWALI_1", "Independent_NEEMUCH_1": "Independent_NEEMUCH_1", "Independent_NEEMUCH_2": "Independent_NEEMUCH_2", "Independent_NEEMUCH_3": "Independent_NEEMUCH_3", "Independent_NEEMUCH_4": "Independent_NEEMUCH_4", "Independent_NEEMUCH_5": "Independent_NEEMUCH_5", "Independent_NIWARI_1": "Independent_NIWARI_1", "Independent_NIWARI_10": "Independent_NIWARI_10", "Independent_NIWARI_11": "Independent_NIWARI_11", "Independent_NIWARI_12": "Independent_NIWARI_12", "Independent_NIWARI_13": "Independent_NIWARI_13", "Independent_NIWARI_14": "Independent_NIWARI_14", "Independent_NIWARI_15": "Independent_NIWARI_15", "Independent_NIWARI_16": "Independent_NIWARI_16", "Independent_NIWARI_17": "Independent_NIWARI_17", "Independent_NIWARI_18": "Independent_NIWARI_18", "Independent_NIWARI_19": "Independent_NIWARI_19", "Independent_NIWARI_2": "Independent_NIWARI_2", "Independent_NIWARI_20": "Independent_NIWARI_20", "Independent_NIWARI_3": "Independent_NIWARI_3", "Independent_NIWARI_4": "Independent_NIWARI_4", "Independent_NIWARI_5": "Independent_NIWARI_5", "Independent_NIWARI_6": "Independent_NIWARI_6", "Independent_NIWARI_7": "Independent_NIWARI_7", "Independent_NIWARI_8": "Independent_NIWARI_8", "Independent_NIWARI_9": "Independent_NIWARI_9", "Independent_NIWAS_1": "Independent_NIWAS_1", "Independent_NIWAS_2": "Independent_NIWAS_2", "Independent_NIWAS_3": "Independent_NIWAS_3", "Independent_NIWAS_4": "Independent_NIWAS_4", "Independent_NIWAS_5": "Independent_NIWAS_5", "Independent_NIWAS_6": "Independent_NIWAS_6", "Independent_NIWAS_7": "Independent_NIWAS_7", "Independent_PANAGAR_1": "Independent_PANAGAR_1", "Independent_PANAGAR_2": "Independent_PANAGAR_2", "Independent_PANAGAR_3": "Independent_PANAGAR_3", "Independent_PANAGAR_4": "Independent_PANAGAR_4", "Independent_PANAGAR_5": "Independent_PANAGAR_5", "Independent_PANAGAR_6": "Independent_PANAGAR_6", "Independent_PANAGAR_7": "Independent_PANAGAR_7", "Independent_PANDHANA_1": "Independent_PANDHANA_1", "Independent_PANDHURNA_1": "Independent_PANDHURNA_1", "Independent_PANDHURNA_2": "Independent_PANDHURNA_2", "Independent_PANDHURNA_3": "Independent_PANDHURNA_3", "Independent_PANDHURNA_4": "Independent_PANDHURNA_4", "Independent_PANDHURNA_5": "Independent_PANDHURNA_5", "Independent_PANDHURNA_6": "Independent_PANDHURNA_6", "Independent_PANDHURNA_7": "Independent_PANDHURNA_7", "Independent_PANDHURNA_8": "Independent_PANDHURNA_8", "Independent_PANNA_1": "Independent_PANNA_1", "Independent_PANNA_10": "Independent_PANNA_10", "Independent_PANNA_2": "Independent_PANNA_2", "Independent_PANNA_3": "Independent_PANNA_3", "Independent_PANNA_4": "Independent_PANNA_4", "Independent_PANNA_5": "Independent_PANNA_5", "Independent_PANNA_6": "Independent_PANNA_6", "Independent_PANNA_7": "Independent_PANNA_7", "Independent_PANNA_8": "Independent_PANNA_8", "Independent_PANNA_9": "Independent_PANNA_9", "Independent_PANSEMAL_S_T_1": "Independent_PANSEMAL_S_T_1", "Independent_PANSEMAL_S_T_2": "Independent_PANSEMAL_S_T_2", "Independent_PANSEMAL_S_T_3": "Independent_PANSEMAL_S_T_3", "Independent_PARASIYA_1": "Independent_PARASIYA_1", "Independent_PARASIYA_2": "Independent_PARASIYA_2", "Independent_PARASIYA_3": "Independent_PARASIYA_3", "Independent_PARASIYA_4": "Independent_PARASIYA_4", "Independent_PARASIYA_5": "Independent_PARASIYA_5", "Independent_PARASIYA_6": "Independent_PARASIYA_6", "Independent_PARASWADA_1": "Independent_PARASWADA_1", "Independent_PARASWADA_10": "Independent_PARASWADA_10", "Independent_PARASWADA_11": "Independent_PARASWADA_11", "Independent_PARASWADA_12": "Independent_PARASWADA_12", "Independent_PARASWADA_13": "Independent_PARASWADA_13", "Independent_PARASWADA_14": "Independent_PARASWADA_14", "Independent_PARASWADA_15": "Independent_PARASWADA_15", "Independent_PARASWADA_16": "Independent_PARASWADA_16", "Independent_PARASWADA_2": "Independent_PARASWADA_2", "Independent_PARASWADA_3": "Independent_PARASWADA_3", "Independent_PARASWADA_4": "Independent_PARASWADA_4", "Independent_PARASWADA_5": "Independent_PARASWADA_5", "Independent_PARASWADA_6": "Independent_PARASWADA_6", "Independent_PARASWADA_7": "Independent_PARASWADA_7", "Independent_PARASWADA_8": "Independent_PARASWADA_8", "Independent_PARASWADA_9": "Independent_PARASWADA_9", "Independent_PATAN_1": "Independent_PATAN_1", "Independent_PATAN_2": "Independent_PATAN_2", "Independent_PATAN_3": "Independent_PATAN_3", "Independent_PATHARIYA_1": "Independent_PATHARIYA_1", "Independent_PATHARIYA_2": "Independent_PATHARIYA_2", "Independent_PATHARIYA_3": "Independent_PATHARIYA_3", "Independent_PATHARIYA_4": "Independent_PATHARIYA_4", "Independent_PATHARIYA_5": "Independent_PATHARIYA_5", "Independent_PATHARIYA_6": "Independent_PATHARIYA_6", "Independent_PATHARIYA_7": "Independent_PATHARIYA_7", "Independent_PATHARIYA_8": "Independent_PATHARIYA_8", "Independent_PAWAI_1": "Independent_PAWAI_1", "Independent_PAWAI_10": "Independent_PAWAI_10", "Independent_PAWAI_2": "Independent_PAWAI_2", "Independent_PAWAI_3": "Independent_PAWAI_3", "Independent_PAWAI_4": "Independent_PAWAI_4", "Independent_PAWAI_5": "Independent_PAWAI_5", "Independent_PAWAI_6": "Independent_PAWAI_6", "Independent_PAWAI_7": "Independent_PAWAI_7", "Independent_PAWAI_8": "Independent_PAWAI_8", "Independent_PAWAI_9": "Independent_PAWAI_9", "Independent_PETLAWAD_1": "Independent_PETLAWAD_1", "Independent_PETLAWAD_2": "Independent_PETLAWAD_2", "Independent_PETLAWAD_3": "Independent_PETLAWAD_3", "Independent_PETLAWAD_4": "Independent_PETLAWAD_4", "Independent_PETLAWAD_5": "Independent_PETLAWAD_5", "Independent_PETLAWAD_6": "Independent_PETLAWAD_6", "Independent_PETLAWAD_7": "Independent_PETLAWAD_7", "Independent_PICHHORE_1": "Independent_PICHHORE_1", "Independent_PICHHORE_10": "Independent_PICHHORE_10", "Independent_PICHHORE_11": "Independent_PICHHORE_11", "Independent_PICHHORE_12": "Independent_PICHHORE_12", "Independent_PICHHORE_13": "Independent_PICHHORE_13", "Independent_PICHHORE_14": "Independent_PICHHORE_14", "Independent_PICHHORE_15": "Independent_PICHHORE_15", "Independent_PICHHORE_16": "Independent_PICHHORE_16", "Independent_PICHHORE_17": "Independent_PICHHORE_17", "Independent_PICHHORE_18": "Independent_PICHHORE_18", "Independent_PICHHORE_19": "Independent_PICHHORE_19", "Independent_PICHHORE_2": "Independent_PICHHORE_2", "Independent_PICHHORE_20": "Independent_PICHHORE_20", "Independent_PICHHORE_21": "Independent_PICHHORE_21", "Independent_PICHHORE_22": "Independent_PICHHORE_22", "Independent_PICHHORE_23": "Independent_PICHHORE_23", "Independent_PICHHORE_24": "Independent_PICHHORE_24", "Independent_PICHHORE_25": "Independent_PICHHORE_25", "Independent_PICHHORE_26": "Independent_PICHHORE_26", "Independent_PICHHORE_3": "Independent_PICHHORE_3", "Independent_PICHHORE_4": "Independent_PICHHORE_4", "Independent_PICHHORE_5": "Independent_PICHHORE_5", "Independent_PICHHORE_6": "Independent_PICHHORE_6", "Independent_PICHHORE_7": "Independent_PICHHORE_7", "Independent_PICHHORE_8": "Independent_PICHHORE_8", "Independent_PICHHORE_9": "Independent_PICHHORE_9", "Independent_PIPARIYA_1": "Independent_PIPARIYA_1", "Independent_PIPARIYA_2": "Independent_PIPARIYA_2", "Independent_PIPARIYA_3": "Independent_PIPARIYA_3", "Independent_POHARI_1": "Independent_POHARI_1", "Independent_POHARI_10": "Independent_POHARI_10", "Independent_POHARI_11": "Independent_POHARI_11", "Independent_POHARI_12": "Independent_POHARI_12", "Independent_POHARI_13": "Independent_POHARI_13", "Independent_POHARI_14": "Independent_POHARI_14", "Independent_POHARI_15": "Independent_POHARI_15", "Independent_POHARI_16": "Independent_POHARI_16", "Independent_POHARI_17": "Independent_POHARI_17", "Independent_POHARI_18": "Independent_POHARI_18", "Independent_POHARI_19": "Independent_POHARI_19", "Independent_POHARI_2": "Independent_POHARI_2", "Independent_POHARI_20": "Independent_POHARI_20", "Independent_POHARI_21": "Independent_POHARI_21", "Independent_POHARI_22": "Independent_POHARI_22", "Independent_POHARI_3": "Independent_POHARI_3", "Independent_POHARI_4": "Independent_POHARI_4", "Independent_POHARI_5": "Independent_POHARI_5", "Independent_POHARI_6": "Independent_POHARI_6", "Independent_POHARI_7": "Independent_POHARI_7", "Independent_POHARI_8": "Independent_POHARI_8", "Independent_POHARI_9": "Independent_POHARI_9", "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_1": "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_1", "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_10": "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_10", "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_11": "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_11", "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_12": "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_12", "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_13": "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_13", "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_14": "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_14", "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_15": "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_15", "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_16": "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_16", "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_2": "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_2", "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_3": "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_3", "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_4": "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_4", "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_5": "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_5", "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_6": "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_6", "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_7": "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_7", "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_8": "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_8", "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_9": "Independent_PRITHVIPUR_9", "Independent_PUSPRAJGARH_1": "Independent_PUSPRAJGARH_1", "Independent_PUSPRAJGARH_2": "Independent_PUSPRAJGARH_2", "Independent_PUSPRAJGARH_3": "Independent_PUSPRAJGARH_3", "Independent_PUSPRAJGARH_4": "Independent_PUSPRAJGARH_4", "Independent_PUSPRAJGARH_5": "Independent_PUSPRAJGARH_5", "Independent_PUSPRAJGARH_6": "Independent_PUSPRAJGARH_6", "Independent_RAGHOGARH_1": "Independent_RAGHOGARH_1", "Independent_RAGHOGARH_2": "Independent_RAGHOGARH_2", "Independent_RAGHOGARH_3": "Independent_RAGHOGARH_3", "Independent_RAGHOGARH_4": "Independent_RAGHOGARH_4", "Independent_RAGHOGARH_5": "Independent_RAGHOGARH_5", "Independent_RAIGAON_1": "Independent_RAIGAON_1", "Independent_RAIGAON_2": "Independent_RAIGAON_2", "Independent_RAIGAON_3": "Independent_RAIGAON_3", "Independent_RAIGAON_4": "Independent_RAIGAON_4", "Independent_RAIGAON_5": "Independent_RAIGAON_5", "Independent_RAIGAON_6": "Independent_RAIGAON_6", "Independent_RAJGARH_1": "Independent_RAJGARH_1", "Independent_RAJGARH_10": "Independent_RAJGARH_10", "Independent_RAJGARH_11": "Independent_RAJGARH_11", "Independent_RAJGARH_2": "Independent_RAJGARH_2", "Independent_RAJGARH_3": "Independent_RAJGARH_3", "Independent_RAJGARH_4": "Independent_RAJGARH_4", "Independent_RAJGARH_5": "Independent_RAJGARH_5", "Independent_RAJGARH_6": "Independent_RAJGARH_6", "Independent_RAJGARH_7": "Independent_RAJGARH_7", "Independent_RAJGARH_8": "Independent_RAJGARH_8", "Independent_RAJGARH_9": "Independent_RAJGARH_9", "Independent_RAJNAGAR_1": "Independent_RAJNAGAR_1", "Independent_RAJNAGAR_2": "Independent_RAJNAGAR_2", "Independent_RAJNAGAR_3": "Independent_RAJNAGAR_3", "Independent_RAJNAGAR_4": "Independent_RAJNAGAR_4", "Independent_RAJNAGAR_5": "Independent_RAJNAGAR_5", "Independent_RAJNAGAR_6": "Independent_RAJNAGAR_6", "Independent_RAJNAGAR_7": "Independent_RAJNAGAR_7", "Independent_RAJPUR_S_T_1": "Independent_RAJPUR_S_T_1", "Independent_RAMPUR_BAGHELAN_1": "Independent_RAMPUR_BAGHELAN_1", "Independent_RAMPUR_BAGHELAN_2": "Independent_RAMPUR_BAGHELAN_2", "Independent_RAMPUR_BAGHELAN_3": "Independent_RAMPUR_BAGHELAN_3", "Independent_RAMPUR_BAGHELAN_4": "Independent_RAMPUR_BAGHELAN_4", "Independent_RAMPUR_BAGHELAN_5": "Independent_RAMPUR_BAGHELAN_5", "Independent_RAMPUR_BAGHELAN_6": "Independent_RAMPUR_BAGHELAN_6", "Independent_RATLAM_CITY_1": "Independent_RATLAM_CITY_1", "Independent_RATLAM_CITY_2": "Independent_RATLAM_CITY_2", "Independent_RATLAM_CITY_3": "Independent_RATLAM_CITY_3", "Independent_RATLAM_RURAL_1": "Independent_RATLAM_RURAL_1", "Independent_RATLAM_RURAL_2": "Independent_RATLAM_RURAL_2", "Independent_RATLAM_RURAL_3": "Independent_RATLAM_RURAL_3", "Independent_RAU_1": "Independent_RAU_1", "Independent_RAU_2": "Independent_RAU_2", "Independent_RAU_3": "Independent_RAU_3", "Independent_REHLI_1": "Independent_REHLI_1", "Independent_REHLI_2": "Independent_REHLI_2", "Independent_REHLI_3": "Independent_REHLI_3", "Independent_REHLI_4": "Independent_REHLI_4", "Independent_REHLI_5": "Independent_REHLI_5", "Independent_REWA_1": "Independent_REWA_1", "Independent_REWA_2": "Independent_REWA_2", "Independent_REWA_3": "Independent_REWA_3", "Independent_REWA_4": "Independent_REWA_4", "Independent_SABALAGADH_1": "Independent_SABALAGADH_1", "Independent_SABALAGADH_2": "Independent_SABALAGADH_2", "Independent_SABALAGADH_3": "Independent_SABALAGADH_3", "Independent_SABALAGADH_4": "Independent_SABALAGADH_4", "Independent_SABALAGADH_5": "Independent_SABALAGADH_5", "Independent_SABALAGADH_6": "Independent_SABALAGADH_6", "Independent_SAGAR_1": "Independent_SAGAR_1", "Independent_SAGAR_2": "Independent_SAGAR_2", "Independent_SAGAR_3": "Independent_SAGAR_3", "Independent_SAGAR_4": "Independent_SAGAR_4", "Independent_SAGAR_5": "Independent_SAGAR_5", "Independent_SAGAR_6": "Independent_SAGAR_6", "Independent_SAGAR_7": "Independent_SAGAR_7", "Independent_SAILANA_1": "Independent_SAILANA_1", "Independent_SAILANA_2": "Independent_SAILANA_2", "Independent_SAILANA_3": "Independent_SAILANA_3", "Independent_SANCHI_SC_1": "Independent_SANCHI_SC_1", "Independent_SANCHI_SC_2": "Independent_SANCHI_SC_2", "Independent_SANCHI_SC_3": "Independent_SANCHI_SC_3", "Independent_SANCHI_SC_4": "Independent_SANCHI_SC_4", "Independent_SANCHI_SC_5": "Independent_SANCHI_SC_5", "Independent_SANCHI_SC_6": "Independent_SANCHI_SC_6", "Independent_SANWER_1": "Independent_SANWER_1", "Independent_SANWER_2": "Independent_SANWER_2", "Independent_SANWER_3": "Independent_SANWER_3", "Independent_SANWER_4": "Independent_SANWER_4", "Independent_SANWER_5": "Independent_SANWER_5", "Independent_SARANGPUR_1": "Independent_SARANGPUR_1", "Independent_SARANGPUR_2": "Independent_SARANGPUR_2", "Independent_SARANGPUR_3": "Independent_SARANGPUR_3", "Independent_SARANGPUR_4": "Independent_SARANGPUR_4", "Independent_SARANGPUR_5": "Independent_SARANGPUR_5", "Independent_SARANGPUR_6": "Independent_SARANGPUR_6", "Independent_SARANGPUR_7": "Independent_SARANGPUR_7", "Independent_SARDARPUR_1": "Independent_SARDARPUR_1", "Independent_SARDARPUR_2": "Independent_SARDARPUR_2", "Independent_SARDARPUR_3": "Independent_SARDARPUR_3", "Independent_SARDARPUR_4": "Independent_SARDARPUR_4", "Independent_SATNA_1": "Independent_SATNA_1", "Independent_SATNA_10": "Independent_SATNA_10", "Independent_SATNA_11": "Independent_SATNA_11", "Independent_SATNA_2": "Independent_SATNA_2", "Independent_SATNA_3": "Independent_SATNA_3", "Independent_SATNA_4": "Independent_SATNA_4", "Independent_SATNA_5": "Independent_SATNA_5", "Independent_SATNA_6": "Independent_SATNA_6", "Independent_SATNA_7": "Independent_SATNA_7", "Independent_SATNA_8": "Independent_SATNA_8", "Independent_SATNA_9": "Independent_SATNA_9", "Independent_SAUSAR_1": "Independent_SAUSAR_1", "Independent_SAUSAR_2": "Independent_SAUSAR_2", "Independent_SAUSAR_3": "Independent_SAUSAR_3", "Independent_SAUSAR_4": "Independent_SAUSAR_4", "Independent_SAUSAR_5": "Independent_SAUSAR_5", "Independent_SAUSAR_6": "Independent_SAUSAR_6", "Independent_SAUSAR_7": "Independent_SAUSAR_7", "Independent_SAUSAR_8": "Independent_SAUSAR_8", "Independent_SEHORE_1": "Independent_SEHORE_1", "Independent_SEHORE_2": "Independent_SEHORE_2", "Independent_SEHORE_3": "Independent_SEHORE_3", "Independent_SEHORE_4": "Independent_SEHORE_4", "Independent_SEHORE_5": "Independent_SEHORE_5", "Independent_SEHORE_6": "Independent_SEHORE_6", "Independent_SEMARIYA_1": "Independent_SEMARIYA_1", "Independent_SEMARIYA_10": "Independent_SEMARIYA_10", "Independent_SEMARIYA_11": "Independent_SEMARIYA_11", "Independent_SEMARIYA_12": "Independent_SEMARIYA_12", "Independent_SEMARIYA_13": "Independent_SEMARIYA_13", "Independent_SEMARIYA_14": "Independent_SEMARIYA_14", "Independent_SEMARIYA_15": "Independent_SEMARIYA_15", "Independent_SEMARIYA_2": "Independent_SEMARIYA_2", "Independent_SEMARIYA_3": "Independent_SEMARIYA_3", "Independent_SEMARIYA_4": "Independent_SEMARIYA_4", "Independent_SEMARIYA_5": "Independent_SEMARIYA_5", "Independent_SEMARIYA_6": "Independent_SEMARIYA_6", "Independent_SEMARIYA_7": "Independent_SEMARIYA_7", "Independent_SEMARIYA_8": "Independent_SEMARIYA_8", "Independent_SEMARIYA_9": "Independent_SEMARIYA_9", "Independent_SENDHWA_S_T_1": "Independent_SENDHWA_S_T_1", "Independent_SENDHWA_S_T_2": "Independent_SENDHWA_S_T_2", "Independent_SENDHWA_S_T_3": "Independent_SENDHWA_S_T_3", "Independent_SENDHWA_S_T_4": "Independent_SENDHWA_S_T_4", "Independent_SEONI_1": "Independent_SEONI_1", "Independent_SEONI_2": "Independent_SEONI_2", "Independent_SEONI_3": "Independent_SEONI_3", "Independent_SEONI_4": "Independent_SEONI_4", "Independent_SEONI_5": "Independent_SEONI_5", "Independent_SEONI_6": "Independent_SEONI_6", "Independent_SEONI_7": "Independent_SEONI_7", "Independent_SEONI_MALWA_1": "Independent_SEONI_MALWA_1", "Independent_SEONI_MALWA_2": "Independent_SEONI_MALWA_2", "Independent_SEONI_MALWA_3": "Independent_SEONI_MALWA_3", "Independent_SEONI_MALWA_4": "Independent_SEONI_MALWA_4", "Independent_SEONI_MALWA_5": "Independent_SEONI_MALWA_5", "Independent_SEONI_MALWA_6": "Independent_SEONI_MALWA_6", "Independent_SEONI_MALWA_7": "Independent_SEONI_MALWA_7", "Independent_SEWDA_1": "Independent_SEWDA_1", "Independent_SEWDA_10": "Independent_SEWDA_10", "Independent_SEWDA_11": "Independent_SEWDA_11", "Independent_SEWDA_12": "Independent_SEWDA_12", "Independent_SEWDA_13": "Independent_SEWDA_13", "Independent_SEWDA_14": "Independent_SEWDA_14", "Independent_SEWDA_15": "Independent_SEWDA_15", "Independent_SEWDA_2": "Independent_SEWDA_2", "Independent_SEWDA_3": "Independent_SEWDA_3", "Independent_SEWDA_4": "Independent_SEWDA_4", "Independent_SEWDA_5": "Independent_SEWDA_5", "Independent_SEWDA_6": "Independent_SEWDA_6", "Independent_SEWDA_7": "Independent_SEWDA_7", "Independent_SEWDA_8": "Independent_SEWDA_8", "Independent_SEWDA_9": "Independent_SEWDA_9", "Independent_SHAHPURA_1": "Independent_SHAHPURA_1", "Independent_SHAHPURA_2": "Independent_SHAHPURA_2", "Independent_SHAHPURA_3": "Independent_SHAHPURA_3", "Independent_SHAHPURA_4": "Independent_SHAHPURA_4", "Independent_SHAJAPUR_1": "Independent_SHAJAPUR_1", "Independent_SHAJAPUR_2": "Independent_SHAJAPUR_2", "Independent_SHAJAPUR_3": "Independent_SHAJAPUR_3", "Independent_SHAJAPUR_4": "Independent_SHAJAPUR_4", "Independent_SHAJAPUR_5": "Independent_SHAJAPUR_5", "Independent_SHAJAPUR_6": "Independent_SHAJAPUR_6", "Independent_SHAMSHABAD_1": "Independent_SHAMSHABAD_1", "Independent_SHAMSHABAD_2": "Independent_SHAMSHABAD_2", "Independent_SHAMSHABAD_3": "Independent_SHAMSHABAD_3", "Independent_SHAMSHABAD_4": "Independent_SHAMSHABAD_4", "Independent_SHAMSHABAD_5": "Independent_SHAMSHABAD_5", "Independent_SHEOPUR_1": "Independent_SHEOPUR_1", "Independent_SHEOPUR_2": "Independent_SHEOPUR_2", "Independent_SHEOPUR_3": "Independent_SHEOPUR_3", "Independent_SHEOPUR_4": "Independent_SHEOPUR_4", "Independent_SHEOPUR_5": "Independent_SHEOPUR_5", "Independent_SHEOPUR_6": "Independent_SHEOPUR_6", "Independent_SHEOPUR_7": "Independent_SHEOPUR_7", "Independent_SHEOPUR_8": "Independent_SHEOPUR_8", "Independent_SHIVPURI_1": "Independent_SHIVPURI_1", "Independent_SHIVPURI_10": "Independent_SHIVPURI_10", "Independent_SHIVPURI_11": "Independent_SHIVPURI_11", "Independent_SHIVPURI_12": "Independent_SHIVPURI_12", "Independent_SHIVPURI_13": "Independent_SHIVPURI_13", "Independent_SHIVPURI_14": "Independent_SHIVPURI_14", "Independent_SHIVPURI_15": "Independent_SHIVPURI_15", "Independent_SHIVPURI_16": "Independent_SHIVPURI_16", "Independent_SHIVPURI_2": "Independent_SHIVPURI_2", "Independent_SHIVPURI_3": "Independent_SHIVPURI_3", "Independent_SHIVPURI_4": "Independent_SHIVPURI_4", "Independent_SHIVPURI_5": "Independent_SHIVPURI_5", "Independent_SHIVPURI_6": "Independent_SHIVPURI_6", "Independent_SHIVPURI_7": "Independent_SHIVPURI_7", "Independent_SHIVPURI_8": "Independent_SHIVPURI_8", "Independent_SHIVPURI_9": "Independent_SHIVPURI_9", "Independent_SHUJALPUR_1": "Independent_SHUJALPUR_1", "Independent_SHUJALPUR_2": "Independent_SHUJALPUR_2", "Independent_SHUJALPUR_3": "Independent_SHUJALPUR_3", "Independent_SHUJALPUR_4": "Independent_SHUJALPUR_4", "Independent_SIDHI_1": "Independent_SIDHI_1", "Independent_SIDHI_10": "Independent_SIDHI_10", "Independent_SIDHI_2": "Independent_SIDHI_2", "Independent_SIDHI_3": "Independent_SIDHI_3", "Independent_SIDHI_4": "Independent_SIDHI_4", "Independent_SIDHI_5": "Independent_SIDHI_5", "Independent_SIDHI_6": "Independent_SIDHI_6", "Independent_SIDHI_7": "Independent_SIDHI_7", "Independent_SIDHI_8": "Independent_SIDHI_8", "Independent_SIDHI_9": "Independent_SIDHI_9", "Independent_SIHAWAL_1": "Independent_SIHAWAL_1", "Independent_SIHAWAL_2": "Independent_SIHAWAL_2", "Independent_SIHAWAL_3": "Independent_SIHAWAL_3", "Independent_SIHAWAL_4": "Independent_SIHAWAL_4", "Independent_SIHAWAL_5": "Independent_SIHAWAL_5", "Independent_SIHAWAL_6": "Independent_SIHAWAL_6", "Independent_SIHAWAL_7": "Independent_SIHAWAL_7", "Independent_SIHAWAL_8": "Independent_SIHAWAL_8", "Independent_SIHORA_1": "Independent_SIHORA_1", "Independent_SILWANI_1": "Independent_SILWANI_1", "Independent_SILWANI_10": "Independent_SILWANI_10", "Independent_SILWANI_11": "Independent_SILWANI_11", "Independent_SILWANI_2": "Independent_SILWANI_2", "Independent_SILWANI_3": "Independent_SILWANI_3", "Independent_SILWANI_4": "Independent_SILWANI_4", "Independent_SILWANI_5": "Independent_SILWANI_5", "Independent_SILWANI_6": "Independent_SILWANI_6", "Independent_SILWANI_7": "Independent_SILWANI_7", "Independent_SILWANI_8": "Independent_SILWANI_8", "Independent_SILWANI_9": "Independent_SILWANI_9", "Independent_SINGAROULI_1": "Independent_SINGAROULI_1", "Independent_SINGAROULI_2": "Independent_SINGAROULI_2", "Independent_SINGAROULI_3": "Independent_SINGAROULI_3", "Independent_SINGAROULI_4": "Independent_SINGAROULI_4", "Independent_SINGAROULI_5": "Independent_SINGAROULI_5", "Independent_SINGAROULI_6": "Independent_SINGAROULI_6", "Independent_SINGAROULI_7": "Independent_SINGAROULI_7", "Independent_SIRMOUR_1": "Independent_SIRMOUR_1", "Independent_SIRMOUR_10": "Independent_SIRMOUR_10", "Independent_SIRMOUR_11": "Independent_SIRMOUR_11", "Independent_SIRMOUR_2": "Independent_SIRMOUR_2", "Independent_SIRMOUR_3": "Independent_SIRMOUR_3", "Independent_SIRMOUR_4": "Independent_SIRMOUR_4", "Independent_SIRMOUR_5": "Independent_SIRMOUR_5", "Independent_SIRMOUR_6": "Independent_SIRMOUR_6", "Independent_SIRMOUR_7": "Independent_SIRMOUR_7", "Independent_SIRMOUR_8": "Independent_SIRMOUR_8", "Independent_SIRMOUR_9": "Independent_SIRMOUR_9", "Independent_SIRONJ_1": "Independent_SIRONJ_1", "Independent_SIRONJ_2": "Independent_SIRONJ_2", "Independent_SIRONJ_3": "Independent_SIRONJ_3", "Independent_SIRONJ_4": "Independent_SIRONJ_4", "Independent_SIRONJ_5": "Independent_SIRONJ_5", "Independent_SIRONJ_6": "Independent_SIRONJ_6", "Independent_SIRONJ_7": "Independent_SIRONJ_7", "Independent_SOHAGPUR_1": "Independent_SOHAGPUR_1", "Independent_SOHAGPUR_2": "Independent_SOHAGPUR_2", "Independent_SOHAGPUR_3": "Independent_SOHAGPUR_3", "Independent_SOHAGPUR_4": "Independent_SOHAGPUR_4", "Independent_SOHAGPUR_5": "Independent_SOHAGPUR_5", "Independent_SOHAGPUR_6": "Independent_SOHAGPUR_6", "Independent_SOHAGPUR_7": "Independent_SOHAGPUR_7", "Independent_SOHAGPUR_8": "Independent_SOHAGPUR_8", "Independent_SOHAGPUR_9": "Independent_SOHAGPUR_9", "Independent_SONKATCH_1": "Independent_SONKATCH_1", "Independent_SONKATCH_2": "Independent_SONKATCH_2", "Independent_SONKATCH_3": "Independent_SONKATCH_3", "Independent_SONKATCH_4": "Independent_SONKATCH_4", "Independent_SUMAOLI_1": "Independent_SUMAOLI_1", "Independent_SUMAOLI_2": "Independent_SUMAOLI_2", "Independent_SUMAOLI_3": "Independent_SUMAOLI_3", "Independent_SUMAOLI_4": "Independent_SUMAOLI_4", "Independent_SUMAOLI_5": "Independent_SUMAOLI_5", "Independent_SUMAOLI_6": "Independent_SUMAOLI_6", "Independent_SURKHI_1": "Independent_SURKHI_1", "Independent_SURKHI_2": "Independent_SURKHI_2", "Independent_SURKHI_3": "Independent_SURKHI_3", "Independent_SURKHI_4": "Independent_SURKHI_4", "Independent_SUWASRA_1": "Independent_SUWASRA_1", "Independent_TARANA_1": "Independent_TARANA_1", "Independent_TARANA_2": "Independent_TARANA_2", "Independent_TARANA_3": "Independent_TARANA_3", "Independent_TENDUKHEDA_1": "Independent_TENDUKHEDA_1", "Independent_TENDUKHEDA_2": "Independent_TENDUKHEDA_2", "Independent_TENDUKHEDA_3": "Independent_TENDUKHEDA_3", "Independent_TENDUKHEDA_4": "Independent_TENDUKHEDA_4", "Independent_TENDUKHEDA_5": "Independent_TENDUKHEDA_5", "Independent_TENDUKHEDA_6": "Independent_TENDUKHEDA_6", "Independent_TEONTHAR_1": "Independent_TEONTHAR_1", "Independent_TEONTHAR_2": "Independent_TEONTHAR_2", "Independent_TEONTHAR_3": "Independent_TEONTHAR_3", "Independent_TEONTHAR_4": "Independent_TEONTHAR_4", "Independent_TEONTHAR_5": "Independent_TEONTHAR_5", "Independent_TEONTHAR_6": "Independent_TEONTHAR_6", "Independent_THANDLA_1": "Independent_THANDLA_1", "Independent_THANDLA_2": "Independent_THANDLA_2", "Independent_THANDLA_3": "Independent_THANDLA_3", "Independent_THANDLA_4": "Independent_THANDLA_4", "Independent_THANDLA_5": "Independent_THANDLA_5", "Independent_THANDLA_6": "Independent_THANDLA_6", "Independent_TIKAMGARH_1": "Independent_TIKAMGARH_1", "Independent_TIKAMGARH_10": "Independent_TIKAMGARH_10", "Independent_TIKAMGARH_11": "Independent_TIKAMGARH_11", "Independent_TIKAMGARH_12": "Independent_TIKAMGARH_12", "Independent_TIKAMGARH_13": "Independent_TIKAMGARH_13", "Independent_TIKAMGARH_14": "Independent_TIKAMGARH_14", "Independent_TIKAMGARH_15": "Independent_TIKAMGARH_15", "Independent_TIKAMGARH_16": "Independent_TIKAMGARH_16", "Independent_TIKAMGARH_17": "Independent_TIKAMGARH_17", "Independent_TIKAMGARH_18": "Independent_TIKAMGARH_18", "Independent_TIKAMGARH_19": "Independent_TIKAMGARH_19", "Independent_TIKAMGARH_2": "Independent_TIKAMGARH_2", "Independent_TIKAMGARH_3": "Independent_TIKAMGARH_3", "Independent_TIKAMGARH_4": "Independent_TIKAMGARH_4", "Independent_TIKAMGARH_5": "Independent_TIKAMGARH_5", "Independent_TIKAMGARH_6": "Independent_TIKAMGARH_6", "Independent_TIKAMGARH_7": "Independent_TIKAMGARH_7", "Independent_TIKAMGARH_8": "Independent_TIKAMGARH_8", "Independent_TIKAMGARH_9": "Independent_TIKAMGARH_9", "Independent_TIMARNI_1": "Independent_TIMARNI_1", "Independent_TIMARNI_2": "Independent_TIMARNI_2", "Independent_TIMARNI_3": "Independent_TIMARNI_3", "Independent_UDAIPURA_1": "Independent_UDAIPURA_1", "Independent_UJJAIN_NORTH_1": "Independent_UJJAIN_NORTH_1", "Independent_UJJAIN_NORTH_2": "Independent_UJJAIN_NORTH_2", "Independent_UJJAIN_NORTH_3": "Independent_UJJAIN_NORTH_3", "Independent_UJJAIN_NORTH_4": "Independent_UJJAIN_NORTH_4", "Independent_UJJAIN_NORTH_5": "Independent_UJJAIN_NORTH_5", "Independent_UJJAIN_SOUTH_1": "Independent_UJJAIN_SOUTH_1", "Independent_UJJAIN_SOUTH_2": "Independent_UJJAIN_SOUTH_2", "Independent_UJJAIN_SOUTH_3": "Independent_UJJAIN_SOUTH_3", "Independent_UJJAIN_SOUTH_4": "Independent_UJJAIN_SOUTH_4", "Independent_UJJAIN_SOUTH_5": "Independent_UJJAIN_SOUTH_5", "Independent_VIDISHA_1": "Independent_VIDISHA_1", "Independent_VIDISHA_2": "Independent_VIDISHA_2", "Independent_VIDISHA_3": "Independent_VIDISHA_3", "Independent_VIDISHA_4": "Independent_VIDISHA_4", "Independent_VIJAYPUR_1": "Independent_VIJAYPUR_1", "Independent_VIJAYPUR_2": "Independent_VIJAYPUR_2", "Independent_VIJAYPUR_3": "Independent_VIJAYPUR_3", "Independent_VIJAYPUR_4": "Independent_VIJAYPUR_4", "Independent_VIJAYPUR_5": "Independent_VIJAYPUR_5", "Independent_VIJAYPUR_6": "Independent_VIJAYPUR_6", "Independent_VIJAYPUR_7": "Independent_VIJAYPUR_7", "Independent_VIJAYPUR_8": "Independent_VIJAYPUR_8", "Independent_VIJAYRAGHAVGARH_1": "Independent_VIJAYRAGHAVGARH_1", "Independent_VIJAYRAGHAVGARH_2": "Independent_VIJAYRAGHAVGARH_2", "Independent_VIJAYRAGHAVGARH_3": "Independent_VIJAYRAGHAVGARH_3", "Independent_VIJAYRAGHAVGARH_4": "Independent_VIJAYRAGHAVGARH_4", "Independent_VIJAYRAGHAVGARH_5": "Independent_VIJAYRAGHAVGARH_5", "Independent_WARASEONI_1": "Independent_WARASEONI_1", "Independent_WARASEONI_2": "Independent_WARASEONI_2", "Independent_WARASEONI_3": "Independent_WARASEONI_3", "Independent_WARASEONI_4": "Independent_WARASEONI_4", "party_ABHM": "party_ABHM", "party_ABKP": "party_ABKP", "party_AD": "party_AD", "party_AIC": "party_AIC", "party_AIFB": "party_AIFB", "party_AMS": "party_AMS", "party_ASP": "party_ASP", "party_BAP": "party_BAP", "party_BHBP": "party_BHBP", "party_BHSSP": "party_BHSSP", "party_BJNKP": "party_BJNKP", "party_BJP": "party_BJP", "party_BJSH": "party_BJSH", "party_BMSM": "party_BMSM", "party_BRVP": "party_BRVP", "party_BSP": "party_BSP", "party_CPI": "party_CPI", "party_CPI(ML)(L)": "party_CPI(ML)(L)", "party_CPM": "party_CPM", "party_GGP": "party_GGP", "party_GMS": "party_GMS", "party_IJP": "party_IJP", "party_INC": "party_INC", "party_IVD": "party_IVD", "party_JD(S)": "party_JD(S)", "party_JD(U)": "party_JD(U)", "party_JMM": "party_JMM", "party_JMM(U)": "party_JMM(U)", "party_KKJHS": "party_KKJHS", "party_LJP": "party_LJP", "party_LPSP": "party_LPSP", "party_LSWP": "party_LSWP", "party_NCP": "party_NCP", "party_NLP": "party_NLP", "party_PRBP": "party_PRBP", "party_PRSP": "party_PRSP", "party_PSJP": "party_PSJP", "party_RDNBP": "party_RDNBP", "party_RGOP": "party_RGOP", "party_RJD": "party_RJD", "party_RLD": "party_RLD", "party_RPI": "party_RPI", "party_RPI(A)": "party_RPI(A)", "party_RSD": "party_RSD", "party_RSGP": "party_RSGP", "party_RSMD": "party_RSMD", "party_RSP": "party_RSP", "party_RTKP": "party_RTKP", "party_SAP": "party_SAP", "party_SHS": "party_SHS", "party_SP": "party_SP", "party_SVSP": "party_SVSP", "party_SWJP": "party_SWJP", "party_YVP": "party_YVP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 230, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 230, "cast_gt_registered": 230}, "n_stations_flagged": 230, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:32:40.959479", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.768, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.854, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.721, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.569, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.111, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 230}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "35f5c004b7824eba9f995b143c0e4bcb", "name": "Malaysia 2022 parliamentary (overnight malaysia_2022_ge15.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_BEBAS": "votes_BEBAS", "votes_BN": "votes_BN", "votes_DAP": "votes_DAP", "votes_GPS": "votes_GPS", "votes_GRS": "votes_GRS", "votes_KDM": "votes_KDM", "votes_MUDA": "votes_MUDA", "votes_PAS": "votes_PAS", "votes_PBDS": "votes_PBDS", "votes_PBK": "votes_PBK", "votes_PBM": "votes_PBM", "votes_PBRS": "votes_PBRS", "votes_PEJUANG": "votes_PEJUANG", "votes_PH": "votes_PH", "votes_PN": "votes_PN", "votes_PPRS": "votes_PPRS", "votes_PRM": "votes_PRM", "votes_PSB": "votes_PSB", "votes_PSM": "votes_PSM", "votes_PUR": "votes_PUR", "votes_PUTRA": "votes_PUTRA", "votes_SEDAR": "votes_SEDAR", "votes_WARISAN": "votes_WARISAN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 222, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:32:29.212726", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.615, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.647, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.459, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.316, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.615, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.647, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.21, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.012, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.561, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.39, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.226, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.343, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.343, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.368, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.615, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 222}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e7c8675929fe4831800c26c602860f01", "name": "India 2008 local (overnight india-rajasthan-2008-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2008, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Rajasthan/Rajasthan_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ABCD(A)": "ABCD(A)", "ABHM": "ABHM", "AIFB": "AIFB", "ASP": "ASP", "BHBP": "BHBP", "BJP": "BJP", "BJSH": "BJSH", "BRSP": "BRSP", "BRVP": "BRVP", "BSP": "BSP", "BVVP": "BVVP", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "CPM": "CPM", "DBSP": "DBSP", "DKD": "DKD", "DND": "DND", "FCI": "FCI", "IJP": "IJP", "INC": "INC", "INLD": "INLD", "IPC": "IPC", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_100_2": "Independent_100_2", "Independent_101_1": "Independent_101_1", "Independent_101_2": "Independent_101_2", "Independent_102_1": "Independent_102_1", "Independent_102_2": "Independent_102_2", "Independent_102_3": "Independent_102_3", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_103_2": "Independent_103_2", "Independent_103_3": "Independent_103_3", "Independent_103_4": "Independent_103_4", "Independent_103_5": "Independent_103_5", "Independent_104_1": "Independent_104_1", "Independent_104_2": "Independent_104_2", "Independent_104_3": "Independent_104_3", "Independent_105_1": "Independent_105_1", "Independent_105_2": "Independent_105_2", "Independent_105_3": "Independent_105_3", "Independent_105_4": "Independent_105_4", "Independent_105_5": "Independent_105_5", "Independent_105_6": "Independent_105_6", "Independent_105_7": "Independent_105_7", "Independent_106_1": "Independent_106_1", "Independent_106_2": "Independent_106_2", "Independent_107_1": "Independent_107_1", "Independent_107_2": "Independent_107_2", "Independent_108_1": "Independent_108_1", "Independent_108_2": "Independent_108_2", "Independent_108_3": "Independent_108_3", "Independent_109_1": "Independent_109_1", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "Independent_10_3": "Independent_10_3", "Independent_10_4": "Independent_10_4", "Independent_10_5": "Independent_10_5", "Independent_10_6": "Independent_10_6", "Independent_110_1": "Independent_110_1", "Independent_110_2": "Independent_110_2", "Independent_110_3": "Independent_110_3", "Independent_110_4": "Independent_110_4", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "Independent_111_2": "Independent_111_2", "Independent_111_3": "Independent_111_3", "Independent_111_4": "Independent_111_4", "Independent_112_1": "Independent_112_1", "Independent_113_1": "Independent_113_1", "Independent_113_2": "Independent_113_2", "Independent_113_3": "Independent_113_3", "Independent_114_1": "Independent_114_1", "Independent_114_2": "Independent_114_2", "Independent_114_3": "Independent_114_3", "Independent_114_4": "Independent_114_4", "Independent_114_5": "Independent_114_5", "Independent_114_6": "Independent_114_6", "Independent_114_7": "Independent_114_7", "Independent_114_8": "Independent_114_8", "Independent_114_9": "Independent_114_9", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_115_2": "Independent_115_2", "Independent_115_3": "Independent_115_3", "Independent_115_4": "Independent_115_4", "Independent_115_5": "Independent_115_5", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "Independent_116_2": "Independent_116_2", "Independent_116_3": "Independent_116_3", "Independent_116_4": "Independent_116_4", "Independent_116_5": "Independent_116_5", "Independent_117_1": "Independent_117_1", "Independent_117_10": "Independent_117_10", "Independent_117_11": "Independent_117_11", "Independent_117_2": "Independent_117_2", "Independent_117_3": "Independent_117_3", "Independent_117_4": "Independent_117_4", "Independent_117_5": "Independent_117_5", "Independent_117_6": "Independent_117_6", "Independent_117_7": "Independent_117_7", "Independent_117_8": "Independent_117_8", "Independent_117_9": "Independent_117_9", "Independent_118_1": "Independent_118_1", "Independent_118_2": "Independent_118_2", "Independent_119_1": "Independent_119_1", "Independent_119_2": "Independent_119_2", "Independent_119_3": "Independent_119_3", "Independent_119_4": "Independent_119_4", "Independent_119_5": "Independent_119_5", "Independent_119_6": "Independent_119_6", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "Independent_120_1": "Independent_120_1", "Independent_120_2": "Independent_120_2", "Independent_120_3": "Independent_120_3", "Independent_120_4": "Independent_120_4", "Independent_120_5": "Independent_120_5", "Independent_120_6": "Independent_120_6", "Independent_120_7": "Independent_120_7", "Independent_120_8": "Independent_120_8", "Independent_121_1": "Independent_121_1", "Independent_121_2": "Independent_121_2", "Independent_121_3": "Independent_121_3", "Independent_121_4": "Independent_121_4", "Independent_121_5": "Independent_121_5", "Independent_121_6": "Independent_121_6", "Independent_121_7": "Independent_121_7", "Independent_122_1": "Independent_122_1", "Independent_123_1": "Independent_123_1", "Independent_123_2": "Independent_123_2", "Independent_123_3": "Independent_123_3", "Independent_123_4": "Independent_123_4", "Independent_123_5": "Independent_123_5", "Independent_124_1": "Independent_124_1", "Independent_125_1": "Independent_125_1", "Independent_125_2": "Independent_125_2", "Independent_126_1": "Independent_126_1", "Independent_126_2": "Independent_126_2", "Independent_127_1": "Independent_127_1", "Independent_127_2": "Independent_127_2", "Independent_127_3": "Independent_127_3", "Independent_127_4": "Independent_127_4", "Independent_127_5": "Independent_127_5", "Independent_127_6": "Independent_127_6", "Independent_128_1": "Independent_128_1", "Independent_128_2": "Independent_128_2", "Independent_128_3": "Independent_128_3", "Independent_128_4": "Independent_128_4", "Independent_128_5": "Independent_128_5", "Independent_128_6": "Independent_128_6", "Independent_128_7": "Independent_128_7", "Independent_128_8": "Independent_128_8", "Independent_128_9": "Independent_128_9", "Independent_129_1": "Independent_129_1", "Independent_129_10": "Independent_129_10", "Independent_129_11": "Independent_129_11", "Independent_129_12": "Independent_129_12", "Independent_129_13": "Independent_129_13", "Independent_129_14": "Independent_129_14", "Independent_129_15": "Independent_129_15", "Independent_129_16": "Independent_129_16", "Independent_129_17": "Independent_129_17", "Independent_129_18": "Independent_129_18", "Independent_129_19": "Independent_129_19", "Independent_129_2": "Independent_129_2", "Independent_129_3": "Independent_129_3", "Independent_129_4": "Independent_129_4", "Independent_129_5": "Independent_129_5", "Independent_129_6": "Independent_129_6", "Independent_129_7": "Independent_129_7", "Independent_129_8": "Independent_129_8", "Independent_129_9": "Independent_129_9", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "Independent_12_3": "Independent_12_3", "Independent_12_4": "Independent_12_4", "Independent_12_5": "Independent_12_5", "Independent_130_1": "Independent_130_1", "Independent_130_2": "Independent_130_2", "Independent_130_3": "Independent_130_3", "Independent_130_4": "Independent_130_4", "Independent_131_1": "Independent_131_1", "Independent_131_2": "Independent_131_2", "Independent_131_3": "Independent_131_3", "Independent_131_4": "Independent_131_4", "Independent_131_5": "Independent_131_5", "Independent_131_6": "Independent_131_6", "Independent_132_1": "Independent_132_1", "Independent_132_2": "Independent_132_2", "Independent_132_3": "Independent_132_3", "Independent_132_4": "Independent_132_4", "Independent_133_1": "Independent_133_1", "Independent_133_2": "Independent_133_2", "Independent_134_1": "Independent_134_1", "Independent_134_2": "Independent_134_2", "Independent_134_3": "Independent_134_3", "Independent_134_4": "Independent_134_4", "Independent_135_1": "Independent_135_1", "Independent_135_2": "Independent_135_2", "Independent_136_1": "Independent_136_1", "Independent_136_2": "Independent_136_2", "Independent_136_3": "Independent_136_3", "Independent_137_1": "Independent_137_1", "Independent_137_2": "Independent_137_2", "Independent_137_3": "Independent_137_3", "Independent_137_4": "Independent_137_4", "Independent_138_1": "Independent_138_1", "Independent_138_2": "Independent_138_2", "Independent_138_3": "Independent_138_3", "Independent_138_4": "Independent_138_4", "Independent_138_5": "Independent_138_5", "Independent_138_6": "Independent_138_6", "Independent_138_7": "Independent_138_7", "Independent_139_1": "Independent_139_1", "Independent_139_2": "Independent_139_2", "Independent_139_3": "Independent_139_3", "Independent_139_4": "Independent_139_4", "Independent_139_5": "Independent_139_5", "Independent_139_6": "Independent_139_6", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_13_10": "Independent_13_10", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "Independent_13_3": "Independent_13_3", "Independent_13_4": "Independent_13_4", "Independent_13_5": "Independent_13_5", "Independent_13_6": "Independent_13_6", "Independent_13_7": "Independent_13_7", "Independent_13_8": "Independent_13_8", "Independent_13_9": "Independent_13_9", "Independent_140_1": "Independent_140_1", "Independent_140_2": "Independent_140_2", "Independent_141_1": "Independent_141_1", "Independent_141_10": "Independent_141_10", "Independent_141_2": "Independent_141_2", "Independent_141_3": "Independent_141_3", "Independent_141_4": "Independent_141_4", "Independent_141_5": "Independent_141_5", "Independent_141_6": "Independent_141_6", "Independent_141_7": "Independent_141_7", "Independent_141_8": "Independent_141_8", "Independent_141_9": "Independent_141_9", "Independent_142_1": "Independent_142_1", "Independent_142_2": "Independent_142_2", "Independent_142_3": "Independent_142_3", "Independent_142_4": "Independent_142_4", "Independent_143_1": "Independent_143_1", "Independent_143_2": "Independent_143_2", "Independent_143_3": "Independent_143_3", "Independent_143_4": "Independent_143_4", "Independent_143_5": "Independent_143_5", "Independent_143_6": "Independent_143_6", "Independent_143_7": "Independent_143_7", "Independent_143_8": "Independent_143_8", "Independent_143_9": "Independent_143_9", "Independent_144_1": "Independent_144_1", "Independent_144_2": "Independent_144_2", "Independent_145_1": "Independent_145_1", "Independent_145_2": "Independent_145_2", "Independent_145_3": "Independent_145_3", "Independent_146_1": "Independent_146_1", "Independent_146_2": "Independent_146_2", "Independent_146_3": "Independent_146_3", "Independent_146_4": "Independent_146_4", "Independent_146_5": "Independent_146_5", "Independent_146_6": "Independent_146_6", "Independent_147_1": "Independent_147_1", "Independent_147_2": "Independent_147_2", "Independent_148_1": "Independent_148_1", "Independent_148_2": "Independent_148_2", "Independent_148_3": "Independent_148_3", "Independent_149_1": "Independent_149_1", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "Independent_14_3": "Independent_14_3", "Independent_14_4": "Independent_14_4", "Independent_14_5": "Independent_14_5", "Independent_14_6": "Independent_14_6", "Independent_14_7": "Independent_14_7", "Independent_14_8": "Independent_14_8", "Independent_150_1": "Independent_150_1", "Independent_150_2": "Independent_150_2", "Independent_151_1": "Independent_151_1", "Independent_152_1": "Independent_152_1", "Independent_153_1": "Independent_153_1", "Independent_153_2": "Independent_153_2", "Independent_153_3": "Independent_153_3", "Independent_153_4": "Independent_153_4", "Independent_153_5": "Independent_153_5", "Independent_153_6": "Independent_153_6", "Independent_153_7": "Independent_153_7", "Independent_154_1": "Independent_154_1", "Independent_154_2": "Independent_154_2", "Independent_154_3": "Independent_154_3", "Independent_154_4": "Independent_154_4", "Independent_154_5": "Independent_154_5", "Independent_154_6": "Independent_154_6", "Independent_154_7": "Independent_154_7", "Independent_155_1": "Independent_155_1", "Independent_155_2": "Independent_155_2", "Independent_155_3": "Independent_155_3", "Independent_156_1": "Independent_156_1", "Independent_157_1": "Independent_157_1", "Independent_158_1": "Independent_158_1", "Independent_159_1": "Independent_159_1", "Independent_159_2": "Independent_159_2", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_161_1": "Independent_161_1", "Independent_161_2": "Independent_161_2", "Independent_162_1": "Independent_162_1", "Independent_162_2": "Independent_162_2", "Independent_162_3": "Independent_162_3", "Independent_163_1": "Independent_163_1", "Independent_163_2": "Independent_163_2", "Independent_163_3": "Independent_163_3", "Independent_163_4": "Independent_163_4", "Independent_164_1": "Independent_164_1", "Independent_165_1": "Independent_165_1", "Independent_166_1": "Independent_166_1", "Independent_166_2": "Independent_166_2", "Independent_166_3": "Independent_166_3", "Independent_167_1": "Independent_167_1", "Independent_167_2": "Independent_167_2", "Independent_168_1": "Independent_168_1", "Independent_168_2": "Independent_168_2", "Independent_168_3": "Independent_168_3", "Independent_168_4": "Independent_168_4", "Independent_169_1": "Independent_169_1", "Independent_169_2": "Independent_169_2", "Independent_169_3": "Independent_169_3", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_16_2": "Independent_16_2", "Independent_16_3": "Independent_16_3", "Independent_16_4": "Independent_16_4", "Independent_171_1": "Independent_171_1", "Independent_171_2": "Independent_171_2", "Independent_173_1": "Independent_173_1", "Independent_173_2": "Independent_173_2", "Independent_173_3": "Independent_173_3", "Independent_173_4": "Independent_173_4", "Independent_173_5": "Independent_173_5", "Independent_174_1": "Independent_174_1", "Independent_174_2": "Independent_174_2", "Independent_175_1": "Independent_175_1", "Independent_175_2": "Independent_175_2", "Independent_176_1": "Independent_176_1", "Independent_176_2": "Independent_176_2", "Independent_176_3": "Independent_176_3", "Independent_177_1": "Independent_177_1", "Independent_177_2": "Independent_177_2", "Independent_177_3": "Independent_177_3", "Independent_177_4": "Independent_177_4", "Independent_178_1": "Independent_178_1", "Independent_178_2": "Independent_178_2", "Independent_179_1": "Independent_179_1", "Independent_179_2": "Independent_179_2", "Independent_179_3": "Independent_179_3", "Independent_179_4": "Independent_179_4", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "Independent_180_1": "Independent_180_1", "Independent_180_2": "Independent_180_2", "Independent_180_3": "Independent_180_3", "Independent_180_4": "Independent_180_4", "Independent_180_5": "Independent_180_5", "Independent_180_6": "Independent_180_6", "Independent_180_7": "Independent_180_7", "Independent_180_8": "Independent_180_8", "Independent_181_1": "Independent_181_1", "Independent_182_1": "Independent_182_1", "Independent_182_2": "Independent_182_2", "Independent_182_3": "Independent_182_3", "Independent_183_1": "Independent_183_1", "Independent_183_2": "Independent_183_2", "Independent_183_3": "Independent_183_3", "Independent_183_4": "Independent_183_4", "Independent_183_5": "Independent_183_5", "Independent_183_6": "Independent_183_6", "Independent_183_7": "Independent_183_7", "Independent_184_1": "Independent_184_1", "Independent_184_2": "Independent_184_2", "Independent_185_1": "Independent_185_1", "Independent_186_1": "Independent_186_1", "Independent_186_2": "Independent_186_2", "Independent_186_3": "Independent_186_3", "Independent_186_4": "Independent_186_4", "Independent_186_5": "Independent_186_5", "Independent_187_1": "Independent_187_1", "Independent_187_2": "Independent_187_2", "Independent_188_1": "Independent_188_1", "Independent_188_2": "Independent_188_2", "Independent_188_3": "Independent_188_3", "Independent_188_4": "Independent_188_4", "Independent_188_5": "Independent_188_5", "Independent_188_6": "Independent_188_6", "Independent_189_1": "Independent_189_1", "Independent_189_2": "Independent_189_2", "Independent_189_3": "Independent_189_3", "Independent_189_4": "Independent_189_4", "Independent_189_5": "Independent_189_5", "Independent_189_6": "Independent_189_6", "Independent_189_7": "Independent_189_7", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_18_3": "Independent_18_3", "Independent_18_4": "Independent_18_4", "Independent_18_5": "Independent_18_5", "Independent_18_6": "Independent_18_6", "Independent_18_7": "Independent_18_7", "Independent_190_1": "Independent_190_1", "Independent_190_2": "Independent_190_2", "Independent_190_3": "Independent_190_3", "Independent_190_4": "Independent_190_4", "Independent_190_5": "Independent_190_5", "Independent_190_6": "Independent_190_6", "Independent_190_7": "Independent_190_7", "Independent_190_8": "Independent_190_8", "Independent_190_9": "Independent_190_9", "Independent_191_1": "Independent_191_1", "Independent_191_2": "Independent_191_2", "Independent_191_3": "Independent_191_3", "Independent_191_4": "Independent_191_4", "Independent_191_5": "Independent_191_5", "Independent_192_1": "Independent_192_1", "Independent_193_1": "Independent_193_1", "Independent_193_2": "Independent_193_2", "Independent_193_3": "Independent_193_3", "Independent_193_4": "Independent_193_4", "Independent_193_5": "Independent_193_5", "Independent_193_6": "Independent_193_6", "Independent_194_1": "Independent_194_1", "Independent_194_2": "Independent_194_2", "Independent_194_3": "Independent_194_3", "Independent_194_4": "Independent_194_4", "Independent_194_5": "Independent_194_5", "Independent_194_6": "Independent_194_6", "Independent_195_1": "Independent_195_1", "Independent_195_2": "Independent_195_2", "Independent_195_3": "Independent_195_3", "Independent_196_1": "Independent_196_1", "Independent_196_2": "Independent_196_2", "Independent_198_1": "Independent_198_1", "Independent_198_2": "Independent_198_2", "Independent_198_3": "Independent_198_3", "Independent_198_4": "Independent_198_4", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_10": "Independent_19_10", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "Independent_19_3": "Independent_19_3", "Independent_19_4": "Independent_19_4", "Independent_19_5": "Independent_19_5", "Independent_19_6": "Independent_19_6", "Independent_19_7": "Independent_19_7", "Independent_19_8": "Independent_19_8", "Independent_19_9": "Independent_19_9", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "Independent_1_3": "Independent_1_3", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_20_2": "Independent_20_2", "Independent_20_3": "Independent_20_3", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_21_2": "Independent_21_2", "Independent_21_3": "Independent_21_3", "Independent_21_4": "Independent_21_4", "Independent_21_5": "Independent_21_5", "Independent_21_6": "Independent_21_6", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_22_2": "Independent_22_2", "Independent_22_3": "Independent_22_3", "Independent_22_4": "Independent_22_4", "Independent_22_5": "Independent_22_5", "Independent_22_6": "Independent_22_6", "Independent_22_7": "Independent_22_7", "Independent_22_8": "Independent_22_8", "Independent_22_9": "Independent_22_9", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "Independent_24_2": "Independent_24_2", "Independent_24_3": "Independent_24_3", "Independent_24_4": "Independent_24_4", "Independent_24_5": "Independent_24_5", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_10": "Independent_25_10", "Independent_25_11": "Independent_25_11", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "Independent_25_4": "Independent_25_4", "Independent_25_5": "Independent_25_5", "Independent_25_6": "Independent_25_6", "Independent_25_7": "Independent_25_7", "Independent_25_8": "Independent_25_8", "Independent_25_9": "Independent_25_9", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "Independent_26_3": "Independent_26_3", "Independent_26_4": "Independent_26_4", "Independent_26_5": "Independent_26_5", "Independent_26_6": "Independent_26_6", "Independent_26_7": "Independent_26_7", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "Independent_27_3": "Independent_27_3", "Independent_27_4": "Independent_27_4", "Independent_27_5": "Independent_27_5", "Independent_27_6": "Independent_27_6", "Independent_27_7": "Independent_27_7", "Independent_27_8": "Independent_27_8", "Independent_27_9": "Independent_27_9", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "Independent_29_4": "Independent_29_4", "Independent_29_5": "Independent_29_5", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "Independent_2_10": "Independent_2_10", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "Independent_2_3": "Independent_2_3", "Independent_2_4": "Independent_2_4", "Independent_2_5": "Independent_2_5", "Independent_2_6": "Independent_2_6", "Independent_2_7": "Independent_2_7", "Independent_2_8": "Independent_2_8", "Independent_2_9": "Independent_2_9", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "Independent_30_10": "Independent_30_10", "Independent_30_11": "Independent_30_11", "Independent_30_12": "Independent_30_12", "Independent_30_13": "Independent_30_13", "Independent_30_14": "Independent_30_14", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "Independent_30_3": "Independent_30_3", "Independent_30_4": "Independent_30_4", "Independent_30_5": "Independent_30_5", "Independent_30_6": "Independent_30_6", "Independent_30_7": "Independent_30_7", "Independent_30_8": "Independent_30_8", "Independent_30_9": "Independent_30_9", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_31_2": "Independent_31_2", "Independent_31_3": "Independent_31_3", "Independent_31_4": "Independent_31_4", "Independent_31_5": "Independent_31_5", "Independent_31_6": "Independent_31_6", "Independent_31_7": "Independent_31_7", "Independent_31_8": "Independent_31_8", "Independent_31_9": "Independent_31_9", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_32_3": "Independent_32_3", "Independent_32_4": "Independent_32_4", "Independent_32_5": "Independent_32_5", "Independent_32_6": "Independent_32_6", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_10": "Independent_33_10", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "Independent_33_4": "Independent_33_4", "Independent_33_5": "Independent_33_5", "Independent_33_6": "Independent_33_6", "Independent_33_7": "Independent_33_7", "Independent_33_8": "Independent_33_8", "Independent_33_9": "Independent_33_9", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_34_3": "Independent_34_3", "Independent_34_4": "Independent_34_4", "Independent_34_5": "Independent_34_5", "Independent_34_6": "Independent_34_6", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "Independent_35_2": "Independent_35_2", "Independent_35_3": "Independent_35_3", "Independent_35_4": "Independent_35_4", "Independent_35_5": "Independent_35_5", "Independent_35_6": "Independent_35_6", "Independent_35_7": "Independent_35_7", "Independent_35_8": "Independent_35_8", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "Independent_37_3": "Independent_37_3", "Independent_37_4": "Independent_37_4", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_38_3": "Independent_38_3", "Independent_38_4": "Independent_38_4", "Independent_38_5": "Independent_38_5", "Independent_38_6": "Independent_38_6", "Independent_38_7": "Independent_38_7", "Independent_38_8": "Independent_38_8", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_39_2": "Independent_39_2", "Independent_39_3": "Independent_39_3", "Independent_39_4": "Independent_39_4", "Independent_39_5": "Independent_39_5", "Independent_39_6": "Independent_39_6", "Independent_39_7": "Independent_39_7", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "Independent_3_3": "Independent_3_3", "Independent_3_4": "Independent_3_4", "Independent_3_5": "Independent_3_5", "Independent_3_6": "Independent_3_6", "Independent_3_7": "Independent_3_7", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_10": "Independent_40_10", "Independent_40_11": "Independent_40_11", "Independent_40_12": "Independent_40_12", "Independent_40_13": "Independent_40_13", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_40_3": "Independent_40_3", "Independent_40_4": "Independent_40_4", "Independent_40_5": "Independent_40_5", "Independent_40_6": "Independent_40_6", "Independent_40_7": "Independent_40_7", "Independent_40_8": "Independent_40_8", "Independent_40_9": "Independent_40_9", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_10": "Independent_41_10", "Independent_41_11": "Independent_41_11", "Independent_41_12": "Independent_41_12", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "Independent_41_3": "Independent_41_3", "Independent_41_4": "Independent_41_4", "Independent_41_5": "Independent_41_5", "Independent_41_6": "Independent_41_6", "Independent_41_7": "Independent_41_7", "Independent_41_8": "Independent_41_8", "Independent_41_9": "Independent_41_9", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_42_2": "Independent_42_2", "Independent_42_3": "Independent_42_3", "Independent_42_4": "Independent_42_4", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_43_2": "Independent_43_2", "Independent_43_3": "Independent_43_3", "Independent_43_4": "Independent_43_4", "Independent_43_5": "Independent_43_5", "Independent_43_6": "Independent_43_6", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "Independent_44_3": "Independent_44_3", "Independent_44_4": "Independent_44_4", "Independent_44_5": "Independent_44_5", "Independent_44_6": "Independent_44_6", "Independent_44_7": "Independent_44_7", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "Independent_46_3": "Independent_46_3", "Independent_46_4": "Independent_46_4", "Independent_46_5": "Independent_46_5", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_47_10": "Independent_47_10", "Independent_47_11": "Independent_47_11", "Independent_47_12": "Independent_47_12", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "Independent_47_3": "Independent_47_3", "Independent_47_4": "Independent_47_4", "Independent_47_5": "Independent_47_5", "Independent_47_6": "Independent_47_6", "Independent_47_7": "Independent_47_7", "Independent_47_8": "Independent_47_8", "Independent_47_9": "Independent_47_9", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_48_2": "Independent_48_2", "Independent_48_3": "Independent_48_3", "Independent_48_4": "Independent_48_4", "Independent_48_5": "Independent_48_5", "Independent_48_6": "Independent_48_6", "Independent_48_7": "Independent_48_7", "Independent_48_8": "Independent_48_8", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "Independent_49_3": "Independent_49_3", "Independent_49_4": "Independent_49_4", "Independent_49_5": "Independent_49_5", "Independent_49_6": "Independent_49_6", "Independent_49_7": "Independent_49_7", "Independent_49_8": "Independent_49_8", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "Independent_4_4": "Independent_4_4", "Independent_4_5": "Independent_4_5", "Independent_4_6": "Independent_4_6", "Independent_4_7": "Independent_4_7", "Independent_4_8": "Independent_4_8", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_10": "Independent_50_10", "Independent_50_11": "Independent_50_11", "Independent_50_12": "Independent_50_12", "Independent_50_13": "Independent_50_13", "Independent_50_14": "Independent_50_14", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_50_3": "Independent_50_3", "Independent_50_4": "Independent_50_4", "Independent_50_5": "Independent_50_5", "Independent_50_6": "Independent_50_6", "Independent_50_7": "Independent_50_7", "Independent_50_8": "Independent_50_8", "Independent_50_9": "Independent_50_9", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_10": "Independent_52_10", "Independent_52_11": "Independent_52_11", "Independent_52_12": "Independent_52_12", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "Independent_52_3": "Independent_52_3", "Independent_52_4": "Independent_52_4", "Independent_52_5": "Independent_52_5", "Independent_52_6": "Independent_52_6", "Independent_52_7": "Independent_52_7", "Independent_52_8": "Independent_52_8", "Independent_52_9": "Independent_52_9", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "Independent_53_10": "Independent_53_10", "Independent_53_11": "Independent_53_11", "Independent_53_2": "Independent_53_2", "Independent_53_3": "Independent_53_3", "Independent_53_4": "Independent_53_4", "Independent_53_5": "Independent_53_5", "Independent_53_6": "Independent_53_6", "Independent_53_7": "Independent_53_7", "Independent_53_8": "Independent_53_8", "Independent_53_9": "Independent_53_9", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_54_10": "Independent_54_10", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_54_3": "Independent_54_3", "Independent_54_4": "Independent_54_4", "Independent_54_5": "Independent_54_5", "Independent_54_6": "Independent_54_6", "Independent_54_7": "Independent_54_7", "Independent_54_8": "Independent_54_8", "Independent_54_9": "Independent_54_9", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_55_2": "Independent_55_2", "Independent_55_3": "Independent_55_3", "Independent_55_4": "Independent_55_4", "Independent_55_5": "Independent_55_5", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_56_2": "Independent_56_2", "Independent_56_3": "Independent_56_3", "Independent_56_4": "Independent_56_4", "Independent_56_5": "Independent_56_5", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_57_2": "Independent_57_2", "Independent_57_3": "Independent_57_3", "Independent_57_4": "Independent_57_4", "Independent_57_5": "Independent_57_5", "Independent_57_6": "Independent_57_6", "Independent_57_7": "Independent_57_7", "Independent_57_8": "Independent_57_8", "Independent_57_9": "Independent_57_9", "Independent_58_1": "Independent_58_1", "Independent_58_2": "Independent_58_2", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_59_2": "Independent_59_2", "Independent_59_3": "Independent_59_3", "Independent_59_4": "Independent_59_4", "Independent_59_5": "Independent_59_5", "Independent_59_6": "Independent_59_6", "Independent_59_7": "Independent_59_7", "Independent_59_8": "Independent_59_8", "Independent_59_9": "Independent_59_9", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "Independent_5_2": "Independent_5_2", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_60_10": "Independent_60_10", "Independent_60_11": "Independent_60_11", "Independent_60_12": "Independent_60_12", "Independent_60_13": "Independent_60_13", "Independent_60_14": "Independent_60_14", "Independent_60_15": "Independent_60_15", "Independent_60_16": "Independent_60_16", "Independent_60_17": "Independent_60_17", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "Independent_60_3": "Independent_60_3", "Independent_60_4": "Independent_60_4", "Independent_60_5": "Independent_60_5", "Independent_60_6": "Independent_60_6", "Independent_60_7": "Independent_60_7", "Independent_60_8": "Independent_60_8", "Independent_60_9": "Independent_60_9", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "Independent_61_3": "Independent_61_3", "Independent_61_4": "Independent_61_4", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_62_3": "Independent_62_3", "Independent_62_4": "Independent_62_4", "Independent_62_5": "Independent_62_5", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "Independent_63_3": "Independent_63_3", "Independent_63_4": "Independent_63_4", "Independent_63_5": "Independent_63_5", "Independent_63_6": "Independent_63_6", "Independent_63_7": "Independent_63_7", "Independent_63_8": "Independent_63_8", "Independent_63_9": "Independent_63_9", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_64_2": "Independent_64_2", "Independent_64_3": "Independent_64_3", "Independent_64_4": "Independent_64_4", "Independent_64_5": "Independent_64_5", "Independent_64_6": "Independent_64_6", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_65_2": "Independent_65_2", "Independent_65_3": "Independent_65_3", "Independent_65_4": "Independent_65_4", "Independent_65_5": "Independent_65_5", "Independent_65_6": "Independent_65_6", "Independent_65_7": "Independent_65_7", "Independent_65_8": "Independent_65_8", "Independent_65_9": "Independent_65_9", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_66_10": "Independent_66_10", "Independent_66_11": "Independent_66_11", "Independent_66_12": "Independent_66_12", "Independent_66_13": "Independent_66_13", "Independent_66_2": "Independent_66_2", "Independent_66_3": "Independent_66_3", "Independent_66_4": "Independent_66_4", "Independent_66_5": "Independent_66_5", "Independent_66_6": "Independent_66_6", "Independent_66_7": "Independent_66_7", "Independent_66_8": "Independent_66_8", "Independent_66_9": "Independent_66_9", "Independent_67_1": "Independent_67_1", "Independent_67_10": "Independent_67_10", "Independent_67_11": "Independent_67_11", "Independent_67_12": "Independent_67_12", "Independent_67_13": "Independent_67_13", "Independent_67_2": "Independent_67_2", "Independent_67_3": "Independent_67_3", "Independent_67_4": "Independent_67_4", "Independent_67_5": "Independent_67_5", "Independent_67_6": "Independent_67_6", "Independent_67_7": "Independent_67_7", "Independent_67_8": "Independent_67_8", "Independent_67_9": "Independent_67_9", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "Independent_68_3": "Independent_68_3", "Independent_68_4": "Independent_68_4", "Independent_68_5": "Independent_68_5", "Independent_68_6": "Independent_68_6", "Independent_68_7": "Independent_68_7", "Independent_68_8": "Independent_68_8", "Independent_68_9": "Independent_68_9", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_69_3": "Independent_69_3", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "Independent_6_2": "Independent_6_2", "Independent_6_3": "Independent_6_3", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "Independent_70_2": "Independent_70_2", "Independent_70_3": "Independent_70_3", "Independent_70_4": "Independent_70_4", "Independent_70_5": "Independent_70_5", "Independent_70_6": "Independent_70_6", "Independent_70_7": "Independent_70_7", "Independent_71_1": "Independent_71_1", "Independent_71_10": "Independent_71_10", "Independent_71_11": "Independent_71_11", "Independent_71_12": "Independent_71_12", "Independent_71_13": "Independent_71_13", "Independent_71_14": "Independent_71_14", "Independent_71_15": "Independent_71_15", "Independent_71_2": "Independent_71_2", "Independent_71_3": "Independent_71_3", "Independent_71_4": "Independent_71_4", "Independent_71_5": "Independent_71_5", "Independent_71_6": "Independent_71_6", "Independent_71_7": "Independent_71_7", "Independent_71_8": "Independent_71_8", "Independent_71_9": "Independent_71_9", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_72_2": "Independent_72_2", "Independent_72_3": "Independent_72_3", "Independent_72_4": "Independent_72_4", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "Independent_73_3": "Independent_73_3", "Independent_73_4": "Independent_73_4", "Independent_73_5": "Independent_73_5", "Independent_73_6": "Independent_73_6", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_74_2": "Independent_74_2", "Independent_74_3": "Independent_74_3", "Independent_74_4": "Independent_74_4", "Independent_74_5": "Independent_74_5", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_76_3": "Independent_76_3", "Independent_76_4": "Independent_76_4", "Independent_76_5": "Independent_76_5", "Independent_76_6": "Independent_76_6", "Independent_76_7": "Independent_76_7", "Independent_76_8": "Independent_76_8", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_77_2": "Independent_77_2", "Independent_77_3": "Independent_77_3", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_78_2": "Independent_78_2", "Independent_78_3": "Independent_78_3", "Independent_78_4": "Independent_78_4", "Independent_78_5": "Independent_78_5", "Independent_78_6": "Independent_78_6", "Independent_78_7": "Independent_78_7", "Independent_79_1": "Independent_79_1", "Independent_79_2": "Independent_79_2", "Independent_79_3": "Independent_79_3", "Independent_79_4": "Independent_79_4", "Independent_79_5": "Independent_79_5", "Independent_79_6": "Independent_79_6", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "Independent_7_2": "Independent_7_2", "Independent_7_3": "Independent_7_3", "Independent_7_4": "Independent_7_4", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_80_2": "Independent_80_2", "Independent_80_3": "Independent_80_3", "Independent_80_4": "Independent_80_4", "Independent_80_5": "Independent_80_5", "Independent_80_6": "Independent_80_6", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "Independent_81_2": "Independent_81_2", "Independent_81_3": "Independent_81_3", "Independent_82_1": "Independent_82_1", "Independent_82_2": "Independent_82_2", "Independent_82_3": "Independent_82_3", "Independent_82_4": "Independent_82_4", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_83_2": "Independent_83_2", "Independent_83_3": "Independent_83_3", "Independent_83_4": "Independent_83_4", "Independent_83_5": "Independent_83_5", "Independent_83_6": "Independent_83_6", "Independent_83_7": "Independent_83_7", "Independent_84_1": "Independent_84_1", "Independent_84_2": "Independent_84_2", "Independent_84_3": "Independent_84_3", "Independent_84_4": "Independent_84_4", "Independent_84_5": "Independent_84_5", "Independent_84_6": "Independent_84_6", "Independent_84_7": "Independent_84_7", "Independent_84_8": "Independent_84_8", "Independent_85_1": "Independent_85_1", "Independent_85_2": "Independent_85_2", "Independent_85_3": "Independent_85_3", "Independent_85_4": "Independent_85_4", "Independent_85_5": "Independent_85_5", "Independent_86_1": "Independent_86_1", "Independent_86_10": "Independent_86_10", "Independent_86_2": "Independent_86_2", "Independent_86_3": "Independent_86_3", "Independent_86_4": "Independent_86_4", "Independent_86_5": "Independent_86_5", "Independent_86_6": "Independent_86_6", "Independent_86_7": "Independent_86_7", "Independent_86_8": "Independent_86_8", "Independent_86_9": "Independent_86_9", "Independent_87_1": "Independent_87_1", "Independent_88_1": "Independent_88_1", "Independent_88_2": "Independent_88_2", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_89_2": "Independent_89_2", "Independent_89_3": "Independent_89_3", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_90_1": "Independent_90_1", "Independent_90_10": "Independent_90_10", "Independent_90_2": "Independent_90_2", "Independent_90_3": "Independent_90_3", "Independent_90_4": "Independent_90_4", "Independent_90_5": "Independent_90_5", "Independent_90_6": "Independent_90_6", "Independent_90_7": "Independent_90_7", "Independent_90_8": "Independent_90_8", "Independent_90_9": "Independent_90_9", "Independent_91_1": "Independent_91_1", "Independent_91_2": "Independent_91_2", "Independent_91_3": "Independent_91_3", "Independent_91_4": "Independent_91_4", "Independent_91_5": "Independent_91_5", "Independent_91_6": "Independent_91_6", "Independent_91_7": "Independent_91_7", "Independent_91_8": "Independent_91_8", "Independent_91_9": "Independent_91_9", "Independent_92_1": "Independent_92_1", "Independent_92_10": "Independent_92_10", "Independent_92_11": "Independent_92_11", "Independent_92_12": "Independent_92_12", "Independent_92_2": "Independent_92_2", "Independent_92_3": "Independent_92_3", "Independent_92_4": "Independent_92_4", "Independent_92_5": "Independent_92_5", "Independent_92_6": "Independent_92_6", "Independent_92_7": "Independent_92_7", "Independent_92_8": "Independent_92_8", "Independent_92_9": "Independent_92_9", "Independent_93_1": "Independent_93_1", "Independent_93_2": "Independent_93_2", "Independent_93_3": "Independent_93_3", "Independent_93_4": "Independent_93_4", "Independent_94_1": "Independent_94_1", "Independent_94_2": "Independent_94_2", "Independent_94_3": "Independent_94_3", "Independent_94_4": "Independent_94_4", "Independent_94_5": "Independent_94_5", "Independent_94_6": "Independent_94_6", "Independent_94_7": "Independent_94_7", "Independent_94_8": "Independent_94_8", "Independent_95_1": "Independent_95_1", "Independent_95_2": "Independent_95_2", "Independent_95_3": "Independent_95_3", "Independent_96_1": "Independent_96_1", "Independent_96_2": "Independent_96_2", "Independent_96_3": "Independent_96_3", "Independent_96_4": "Independent_96_4", "Independent_97_1": "Independent_97_1", "Independent_97_2": "Independent_97_2", "Independent_97_3": "Independent_97_3", "Independent_98_1": "Independent_98_1", "Independent_98_2": "Independent_98_2", "Independent_98_3": "Independent_98_3", "Independent_98_4": "Independent_98_4", "Independent_98_5": "Independent_98_5", "Independent_99_1": "Independent_99_1", "Independent_99_2": "Independent_99_2", "Independent_99_3": "Independent_99_3", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "Independent_9_2": "Independent_9_2", "Independent_9_3": "Independent_9_3", "Independent_9_4": "Independent_9_4", "Independent_9_5": "Independent_9_5", "Independent_9_6": "Independent_9_6", "Independent_9_7": "Independent_9_7", "Independent_9_8": "Independent_9_8", "JD(S)": "JD(S)", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "JGP": "JGP", "LJP": "LJP", "LKPT": "LKPT", "LSWP": "LSWP", "NCP": "NCP", "NLHP": "NLHP", "NPSF": "NPSF", "RDSD": "RDSD", "RGD": "RGD", "RJVP": "RJVP", "RKSP": "RKSP", "RLD": "RLD", "RSD": "RSD", "RSMD": "RSMD", "SAP": "SAP", "SHS": "SHS", "SLP(L)": "SLP(L)", "SP": "SP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 200, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 200, "cast_gt_registered": 200}, "n_stations_flagged": 200, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:32:25.782834", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.768, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.854, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.721, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.569, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.111, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 200}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7b93337925124944be67483890ccde63", "name": "Sri Lanka 2020 parliamentary (overnight srilanka_2020_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Sri Lanka", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"All Are Citizens All Are Kings Organization": "All Are Citizens All Are Kings Organization", "All Ceylon Makkal Congress": "All Ceylon Makkal Congress", "All Lanka Tamil Mahasabha": "All Lanka Tamil Mahasabha", "Democratic Left Front": "Democratic Left Front", "Democratic United National Front": "Democratic United National Front", "Eelam People's Democratic Party": "Eelam People's Democratic Party", "Eelavar Democratic Front": "Eelavar Democratic Front", "Front Socialist Party": "Front Socialist Party", "Independent": "Independent", "Lanka Sama Samaja Party": "Lanka Sama Samaja Party", "Liberal Party": "Liberal Party", "Motherland People's Party": "Motherland People's Party", "Muslim National Alliance": "Muslim National Alliance", "National Congress": "National Congress", "National Democratic Front": "National Democratic Front", "National Development Front": "National Development Front", "National People's Party": "National People's Party", "National People's Power": "National People's Power", "New Democratic Front": "New Democratic Front", "New Sinhala Heritage": "New Sinhala Heritage", "Our Power of People's Party": "Our Power of People's Party", "People's Welfare Front": "People's Welfare Front", "Samagi Jana Balawegaya": "Samagi Jana Balawegaya", "Sinhalese National Front": "Sinhalese National Front", "Social Democratic Party of Tamils": "Social Democratic Party of Tamils", "Socialist Equality Party": "Socialist Equality Party", "Socialist Party of Sri Lanka": "Socialist Party of Sri Lanka", "Sri Lanka Freedom Party": "Sri Lanka Freedom Party", "Sri Lanka Labour Party": "Sri Lanka Labour Party", "Sri Lanka Muslim Congress": "Sri Lanka Muslim Congress", "Sri Lanka People's Freedom Alliance": "Sri Lanka People's Freedom Alliance", "Tamil Makkal Viduthalai Pulikal": "Tamil Makkal Viduthalai Pulikal", "Tamil National Alliance": "Tamil National Alliance", "Tamil National People's Front": "Tamil National People's Front", "Tamil People's National Alliance": "Tamil People's National Alliance", "Tamil United Liberation Front": "Tamil United Liberation Front", "United Left Front": "United Left Front", "United National Party": "United National Party", "United Peace Alliance": "United Peace Alliance", "United Socialist Party": "United Socialist Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 183, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 183, "registered_not_positive": 183}, "n_stations_flagged": 183, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:32:18.126410", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.682, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.9, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.579, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.379, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.9, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.69, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.593, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.757, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.23, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.307, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.379, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.379, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.385, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.385, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.611, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.611, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.657, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.657, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 183}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "380b734397884a1d9a511146d45d6f9a", "name": "Sri Lanka 2015 presidential (overnight srilanka-2015-presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Sri Lanka", "year": 2015, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Aithurus Mohamed Illias": "Aithurus Mohamed Illias", "Anuruddha Polgampala": "Anuruddha Polgampala", "Arachchige Rathnayaka Sirisena": "Arachchige Rathnayaka Sirisena", "Baththaramulle Seelarathana Thero": "Baththaramulle Seelarathana Thero", "Duminda Nagamuwa": "Duminda Nagamuwa", "Ibrahim Miflar": "Ibrahim Miflar", "Jayantha Kulathunga": "Jayantha Kulathunga", "M. B. Theminimulla": "M. B. Theminimulla", "Mahinda Rajapaksha": "Mahinda Rajapaksha", "Maithripala Sirisena": "Maithripala Sirisena", "Namal Rajapaksa": "Namal Rajapaksa", "Panagoda Don Prince Soloman Anura Liyanage": "Panagoda Don Prince Soloman Anura Liyanage", "Pani Wijesiriwardane": "Pani Wijesiriwardane", "Prasanna Priyankara": "Prasanna Priyankara", "Ruwanthilaka Peduru Arachchi": "Ruwanthilaka Peduru Arachchi", "Sarath Manamendra": "Sarath Manamendra", "Sirithunga Jayasuriya": "Sirithunga Jayasuriya", "Sundaram Mahendran": "Sundaram Mahendran", "Wimal Geeganage": "Wimal Geeganage"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 182, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:32:16.343274", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.168, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.036, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.55, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.397, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.168, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.036, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.401, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.731, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.192, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.55, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.397, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.397, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.361, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.361, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.735, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.515, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.515, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.692, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "New Democratic Front (NDF)", "winner_candidate": "Maithripala Sirisena", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "United People's Freedom Alliance (UPFA)", "margin": 3.7, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "LKA", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 182}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d9562bd150054641853b64e67993ecf3", "name": "Sri Lanka 2019 presidential (overnight srilanka_2019_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Sri Lanka", "year": 2019, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Aparakke_Pungngananda_Thero": "Aparakke_Pungngananda_Thero", "S_Amarasinghe": "S_Amarasinghe", "Idroos_Mohamadhu_Illiyas": "Idroos_Mohamadhu_Illiyas", "A_H_M_Alavi": "A_H_M_Alavi", "Ariyawansha_Dissanayake": "Ariyawansha_Dissanayake", "P_M_Edirisinghe": "P_M_Edirisinghe", "Sarath_Keerthirathne": "Sarath_Keerthirathne", "Chandrasekara_Herath_Hitihami_Koralalage_Samansiri": "Chandrasekara_Herath_Hitihami_Koralalage_Samansiri", "Sirithunga_Jayasuriya": "Sirithunga_Jayasuriya", "Ajantha_De_Zoysa": "Ajantha_De_Zoysa", "Aruna_De_Zoysa": "Aruna_De_Zoysa", "Anura_Kumara_Dissanayaka": "Anura_Kumara_Dissanayaka", "Duminda_Nagamuwa": "Duminda_Nagamuwa", "Rohan_Pallewatta": "Rohan_Pallewatta", "Ketagoda_Jayantha": "Ketagoda_Jayantha", "Saman_Perera": "Saman_Perera", "Anuruddha_Polgampala": "Anuruddha_Polgampala", "Warnakulasooriya_Milroy_Surgeus_Fernando": "Warnakulasooriya_Milroy_Surgeus_Fernando", "Sajith_Premadasa": "Sajith_Premadasa", "Battaramulle_Seelarathana_Thero": "Battaramulle_Seelarathana_Thero", "Badde_Gamage_Nandimithra": "Badde_Gamage_Nandimithra", "Sarath_Manamendra": "Sarath_Manamendra", "M_K_Shivajilingam": "M_K_Shivajilingam", "M_L_A_M_Hizbullah": "M_L_A_M_Hizbullah", "Gotabaya_Rajapaksa": "Gotabaya_Rajapaksa", "Namal_Rajapaksha": "Namal_Rajapaksha", "A_S_P_Liyanage": "A_S_P_Liyanage", "Ashoka_Wadigamangawa": "Ashoka_Wadigamangawa", "Piyasiri_Wijenayake": "Piyasiri_Wijenayake", "Ajantha_Perera": "Ajantha_Perera", "Rajiva_Wijesinha": "Rajiva_Wijesinha", "Pani_Wijesiriwardane": "Pani_Wijesiriwardane", "Samaraweera_Weerawanni": "Samaraweera_Weerawanni", "Subbramaniyam_Gunarathnam": "Subbramaniyam_Gunarathnam", "Mahesh_Senanayake": "Mahesh_Senanayake"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 182, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:32:14.513261", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.878, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.9, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.564, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.439, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.9, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.791, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.611, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.731, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.561, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.39, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.564, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.564, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.399, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.399, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.503, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.702, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 182}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d90d2d824f8440dba275da510d23a872", "name": "India 2007 state assembly election (vidhan sabha) (overnight india-punjab-2007-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2007, "election_type": "other", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"district_name": "district_name", "NIRMAL SINGH KAHLON (SAD)": "NIRMAL SINGH KAHLON (SAD)", "SUKHJINDER SINGH RANDHAWA DHAROWALI (INC)": "SUKHJINDER SINGH RANDHAWA DHAROWALI (INC)", "GULZAR SINGH (CPI)": "GULZAR SINGH (CPI)", "GURBAX SINGH (IND)": "GURBAX SINGH (IND)", "JASWINDER SINGH (LJP)": "JASWINDER SINGH (LJP)", "SUKHJINDER SINGH RANDHAWA (IND)": "SUKHJINDER SINGH RANDHAWA (IND)", "JAGIR SINGH (BSP)": "JAGIR SINGH (BSP)", "BALWINDER SINGH (SAD(M))": "BALWINDER SINGH (SAD(M))", "JAGDISH SAHNI (BJP)": "JAGDISH SAHNI (BJP)", "ASHWANI (INC)": "ASHWANI (INC)", "SURJIT SINGH (BSP)": "SURJIT SINGH (BSP)", "GURINDER SINGH (IND)": "GURINDER SINGH (IND)", "RANBIR SINGH (CPM)": "RANBIR SINGH (CPM)", "GURMIT SINGH (SAD(M))": "GURMIT SINGH (SAD(M))", "KARAN AHUJA (IND)": "KARAN AHUJA (IND)", "GURMIT SINGH S/O RAJWANT SINGH (IND)": "GURMIT SINGH S/O RAJWANT SINGH (IND)", "SURINDER SINGH (IND)": "SURINDER SINGH (IND)", "DALIP KUMAR (PBLP)": "DALIP KUMAR (PBLP)", "NIRMAL SINGH SADARANG (BSP(A))": "NIRMAL SINGH SADARANG (BSP(A))", "SAHIL (IND)": "SAHIL (IND)", "LAKHBIR SINGH LODHINANGAL (SAD)": "LAKHBIR SINGH LODHINANGAL (SAD)", "TRIPT RAJINDER SINGH BAJWA (INC)": "TRIPT RAJINDER SINGH BAJWA (INC)", "RAJINDER SINGH MARAR (BSP)": "RAJINDER SINGH MARAR (BSP)", "RANJIT SINGH SANGRAWAN (IND)": "RANJIT SINGH SANGRAWAN (IND)", "BALWINDER SINGH NANGAL (BSP(A))": "BALWINDER SINGH NANGAL (BSP(A))", "COMRADE SONA MASIH (CPI(ML)(L))": "COMRADE SONA MASIH (CPI(ML)(L))", "HARMIT SINGH (LJP)": "HARMIT SINGH (LJP)", "CAPT BALBIR SINGH BATH (SAD)": "CAPT BALBIR SINGH BATH (SAD)", "FATEH JANG SINGH BAJWA (INC)": "FATEH JANG SINGH BAJWA (INC)", "LOVELEEN CHAHAL (CPI)": "LOVELEEN CHAHAL (CPI)", "HARDEV SINGH PANNU (BSP)": "HARDEV SINGH PANNU (BSP)", "MUKHTAR SINGH (MUKHA KHUZALA) (IND)": "MUKHTAR SINGH (MUKHA KHUZALA) (IND)", "NAVNEET KAUR LADI (BSP(A))": "NAVNEET KAUR LADI (BSP(A))", "LAKHWINDER SINGH (IND)": "LAKHWINDER SINGH (IND)", "PALWINDER SINGH (IND)": "PALWINDER SINGH (IND)", "PARTAP SINGH BAJWA (INC)": "PARTAP SINGH BAJWA (INC)", "SEWA SINGH SEKHWAN (SAD)": "SEWA SINGH SEKHWAN (SAD)", "NARINDER KAUR (IND)": "NARINDER KAUR (IND)", "LAKHWINDER SINGH (BSP)": "LAKHWINDER SINGH (BSP)", "JOGINDER SINGH (IND)": "JOGINDER SINGH (IND)", "SEWA SINGH (IND)": "SEWA SINGH (IND)", "SANDEEP RAJ (IND)": "SANDEEP RAJ (IND)", "JAGTAR SINGH (SAD(M))": "JAGTAR SINGH (SAD(M))", "RAJESH SINGH (BGTD)": "RAJESH SINGH (BGTD)", "PALWINDER SINGH (LJP)": "PALWINDER SINGH (LJP)", "SUCHA SINGH LANGAH (SAD)": "SUCHA SINGH LANGAH (SAD)", "SUCHA SINGH CHHOTEPUR (IND)": "SUCHA SINGH CHHOTEPUR (IND)", "ABRAHAM IRSHAD (INC)": "ABRAHAM IRSHAD (INC)", "KULWANT SINGH (BSP)": "KULWANT SINGH (BSP)", "SUCHA SINGH (LJP)": "SUCHA SINGH (LJP)", "GURBACHAN SINGH (SAD)": "GURBACHAN SINGH (SAD)", "PRITAM SINGH BHINDER (INC)": "PRITAM SINGH BHINDER (INC)", "KAMALJIT SHARMA (IND)": "KAMALJIT SHARMA (IND)", "HARBALWINDER SINGH (LJP)": "HARBALWINDER SINGH (LJP)", "HARMINDER SINGH (IND)": "HARMINDER SINGH (IND)", "SHIV KUMAR (IND)": "SHIV KUMAR (IND)", "GURBHEJ SINGH (SAD(M))": "GURBHEJ SINGH (SAD(M))", "SHAMSHER SINGH (IND)": "SHAMSHER SINGH (IND)", "SITA RAM (BJP)": "SITA RAM (BJP)", "ARUNA CHOUDHRY (INC)": "ARUNA CHOUDHRY (INC)", "SUBASH CHANDER (CPI)": "SUBASH CHANDER (CPI)", "VARINDER BHARTI (LJP)": "VARINDER BHARTI (LJP)", "VED PAL (BSP)": "VED PAL (BSP)", "BISHAMBER DASS (BJP)": "BISHAMBER DASS (BJP)", "RUMAL CHAND (INC)": "RUMAL CHAND (INC)", "AMARJIT SINGH (BSP)": "AMARJIT SINGH (BSP)", "LAL CHAND (IND)": "LAL CHAND (IND)", "CHUNI LAL (IND)": "CHUNI LAL (IND)", "RAM LAL (BJSH)": "RAM LAL (BJSH)", "SAWATAM DASS (IND)": "SAWATAM DASS (IND)", "KEWAL RAJ (LJP)": "KEWAL RAJ (LJP)", "BHART MUNI (IND)": "BHART MUNI (IND)", "SAT PAL (IND)": "SAT PAL (IND)", "MASTER MOHAN LAL (BJP)": "MASTER MOHAN LAL (BJP)", "ASHOK SHARMA (INC)": "ASHOK SHARMA (INC)", "RAMESH KUMAR (IND)": "RAMESH KUMAR (IND)", "KRISHAN LAL MEHTA (BSP)": "KRISHAN LAL MEHTA (BSP)", "OM SHANKAR JAIDKA (NCP)": "OM SHANKAR JAIDKA (NCP)", "MANJU GUPTA (IND)": "MANJU GUPTA (IND)", "AMIT AGARWAL (IND)": "AMIT AGARWAL (IND)", "DINESH SINGH (BJP)": "DINESH SINGH (BJP)", "RAGHUNATH SAHAI PURI (INC)": "RAGHUNATH SAHAI PURI (INC)", "NARAIN SINGH (IND)": "NARAIN SINGH (IND)", "JAGDISH RAJ (BSP)": "JAGDISH RAJ (BSP)", "SUKRIT SHARDA (BJSH)": "SUKRIT SHARDA (BJSH)", "AVINASH CHANDER SHARMA (NCP)": "AVINASH CHANDER SHARMA (NCP)", "BANSO (LJP)": "BANSO (LJP)", "RAJIV KUMAR (SHS)": "RAJIV KUMAR (SHS)", "BIKRAM SINGH MAJITHIA (SAD)": "BIKRAM SINGH MAJITHIA (SAD)", "SUKHJINDER RAJ SINGH (LALLI) MAJITHIA (INC)": "SUKHJINDER RAJ SINGH (LALLI) MAJITHIA (INC)", "JAGTESHWAR SINGH MAJITHA (IND)": "JAGTESHWAR SINGH MAJITHA (IND)", "BALWINDER SINGH (CPI)": "BALWINDER SINGH (CPI)", "NATHA SINGH (BSP)": "NATHA SINGH (BSP)", "SUKHJINDER SINGH LALI (IND)": "SUKHJINDER SINGH LALI (IND)", "DALBIR SINGH (SAD)": "DALBIR SINGH (SAD)", "RAJ KUMAR (INC)": "RAJ KUMAR (INC)", "BHAJAN SINGH (BSP)": "BHAJAN SINGH (BSP)", "SURINDER SINGH (CPM)": "SURINDER SINGH (CPM)", "PURAN CHAND (IND)": "PURAN CHAND (IND)", "TARSEM SINGH (IND)": "TARSEM SINGH (IND)", "KAWALJIT SINGH (BSP(A))": "KAWALJIT SINGH (BSP(A))", "MALKIAT SINGH (SAD)": "MALKIAT SINGH (SAD)", "SARDUL SINGH (INC)": "SARDUL SINGH (INC)", "AJAIB SINGH (BSP)": "AJAIB SINGH (BSP)", "DILBAGH SINGH (IND)": "DILBAGH SINGH (IND)", "SARABJIT SINGH TAKHTU CHAK (BSP(A))": "SARABJIT SINGH TAKHTU CHAK (BSP(A))", "SAWINDER PAL SINGH BASARKE (SAD(M))": "SAWINDER PAL SINGH BASARKE (SAD(M))", "ANIL JOSHI (BJP)": "ANIL JOSHI (BJP)", "JUGAL KISHORE SHARMA (INC)": "JUGAL KISHORE SHARMA (INC)", "YOGINDER PAL DHINGRA (IND)": "YOGINDER PAL DHINGRA (IND)", "ASHU ARORA (DBSP)": "ASHU ARORA (DBSP)", "RAVI KUMAR (IND)": "RAVI KUMAR (IND)", "SALINDER SINGH (IND)": "SALINDER SINGH (IND)", "SATNAM SINGH (IND)": "SATNAM SINGH (IND)", "AKASHDEEP SETHI (IND)": "AKASHDEEP SETHI (IND)", "OM PARKASH SONI (INC)": "OM PARKASH SONI (INC)", "RAJINDER MOHAN SINGH CHHINA (BJP)": "RAJINDER MOHAN SINGH CHHINA (BJP)", "AMARJIT SINGH ASAL (CPI)": "AMARJIT SINGH ASAL (CPI)", "RAJINDER KUMAR (CAPTAIN) (NCP)": "RAJINDER KUMAR (CAPTAIN) (NCP)", "AJIT KUMAR MALIK (BSP)": "AJIT KUMAR MALIK (BSP)", "ARJINDER SINGH PANNU (IND)": "ARJINDER SINGH PANNU (IND)", "VIPAN KUMAR NAYYAR (SHS)": "VIPAN KUMAR NAYYAR (SHS)", "RAJ KUMAR BABI (BSP(A))": "RAJ KUMAR BABI (BSP(A))", "LAKSHMI KANTA CHAWLA (BJP)": "LAKSHMI KANTA CHAWLA (BJP)", "DARBARI LAL (INC)": "DARBARI LAL (INC)", "ARUN KUMAR PAPPAL (IND)": "ARUN KUMAR PAPPAL (IND)", "SURINDER ARJUN PANDIT (BSP)": "SURINDER ARJUN PANDIT (BSP)", "GOPI CHAND (IND)": "GOPI CHAND (IND)", "VIVEK SHARMA (IND)": "VIVEK SHARMA (IND)", "AJAY (IND)": "AJAY (IND)", "JASBIR KAUR (AIFB)": "JASBIR KAUR (AIFB)", "RAJINDER KHANNA (IND)": "RAJINDER KHANNA (IND)", "RAJAN SEHGAL (IND)": "RAJAN SEHGAL (IND)", "RAMINDER SINGH BOLARIA (SAD)": "RAMINDER SINGH BOLARIA (SAD)", "HARJINDER SINGH THEKEDAR (INC)": "HARJINDER SINGH THEKEDAR (INC)", "ASHWANI KUMAR (BSP)": "ASHWANI KUMAR (BSP)", "PAWAN KUMAR (IND)": "PAWAN KUMAR (IND)", "RAJVINDER KUMAR SEHDEV (RSP)": "RAJVINDER KUMAR SEHDEV (RSP)", "AMARPAL SINGH AJNALA (SAD)": "AMARPAL SINGH AJNALA (SAD)", "HARPARTAP SINGH AJNALA (INC)": "HARPARTAP SINGH AJNALA (INC)", "HARINDER SINGH HUNNY (IND)": "HARINDER SINGH HUNNY (IND)", "DALBIR MASIH (BSP)": "DALBIR MASIH (BSP)", "HARPARTAP SINGH (IND)": "HARPARTAP SINGH (IND)", "JAGDISH KAUR (BSP(A))": "JAGDISH KAUR (BSP(A))", "AMRATPAL SINGH (IND)": "AMRATPAL SINGH (IND)", "SUKHBINDER SINGH SARKARIA (INC)": "SUKHBINDER SINGH SARKARIA (INC)", "VIR SINGH LOPOKE (SAD)": "VIR SINGH LOPOKE (SAD)", "RAGHBIR SINGH (IND)": "RAGHBIR SINGH (IND)", "JOGINDER SINGH BHULLAR (BSP)": "JOGINDER SINGH BHULLAR (BSP)", "GURNAM SINGH GILL (BSP(A))": "GURNAM SINGH GILL (BSP(A))", "MAJOR SINGH (IND)": "MAJOR SINGH (IND)", "NANAK SINGH (IND)": "NANAK SINGH (IND)", "MANDEEP SINGH (IND)": "MANDEEP SINGH (IND)", "GULZAR SINGH RANIKE (SAD)": "GULZAR SINGH RANIKE (SAD)", "RATTAN SINGH (INC)": "RATTAN SINGH (INC)", "SUKHWANTJIT KAUR (BSP)": "SUKHWANTJIT KAUR (BSP)", "PURAN SINGH SEKH (BSP(A))": "PURAN SINGH SEKH (BSP(A))", "TEJINDER SINGH (IND)": "TEJINDER SINGH (IND)", "DESRAJ SINGH (IND)": "DESRAJ SINGH (IND)", "KULWANT SINGH MUHAWA (IND)": "KULWANT SINGH MUHAWA (IND)", "AMRIK SINGH SHERGILL (IND)": "AMRIK SINGH SHERGILL (IND)", "KASHMIR SINGH (IND)": "KASHMIR SINGH (IND)", "HARMEET SINGH (SAD)": "HARMEET SINGH (SAD)", "MANJIT SINGH (INC)": "MANJIT SINGH (INC)", "AMRIK SINGH (LBP)": "AMRIK SINGH (LBP)", "AVTAR SINGH (BSP)": "AVTAR SINGH (BSP)", "BALWANT SINGH (BSP(A))": "BALWANT SINGH (BSP(A))", "RAJBIR KAUR (IND)": "RAJBIR KAUR (IND)", "GURDEV SINGH (IND)": "GURDEV SINGH (IND)", "MANJIT SINGH MIANWIND (SAD)": "MANJIT SINGH MIANWIND (SAD)", "TARSEM SINGH (INC)": "TARSEM SINGH (INC)", "GURDIYAL SINGH (CPI)": "GURDIYAL SINGH (CPI)", "JAGTAR SINGH (BSP)": "JAGTAR SINGH (BSP)", "KAWALJIT SINGH GILL (BSP(A))": "KAWALJIT SINGH GILL (BSP(A))", "SURTA SINGH (IND)": "SURTA SINGH (IND)", "JASWANT SINGH (DBSP)": "JASWANT SINGH (DBSP)", "SUKHDEV SINGH (IND)": "SUKHDEV SINGH (IND)", "RANJIT SINGH BRAHAMPURA (SAD)": "RANJIT SINGH BRAHAMPURA (SAD)", "DHARAMBIR AGANIHOTRI SHERON (INC)": "DHARAMBIR AGANIHOTRI SHERON (INC)", "KULWINDER SINGH (BSP)": "KULWINDER SINGH (BSP)", "MILKHA SINGH (BSP(A))": "MILKHA SINGH (BSP(A))", "GURVAIL SINGH (LJP)": "GURVAIL SINGH (LJP)", "BALWANT SINGH (SAD(M))": "BALWANT SINGH (SAD(M))", "ADESH PARTAP SINGH (SAD)": "ADESH PARTAP SINGH (SAD)", "HARMINDER SINGH GILL (INC)": "HARMINDER SINGH GILL (INC)", "CHAMAN LAL (IND)": "CHAMAN LAL (IND)", "JASBIR SINGH (BSP)": "JASBIR SINGH (BSP)", "SUKHWANT SINGH (IND)": "SUKHWANT SINGH (IND)", "SUKHCHAIN SINGH (BSP(A))": "SUKHCHAIN SINGH (BSP(A))", "BALDEV SINGH (LJP)": "BALDEV SINGH (LJP)", "MANJIT SINGH (LPSP)": "MANJIT SINGH (LPSP)", "VIRSA SINGH (SAD)": "VIRSA SINGH (SAD)", "GURCHET SINGH (INC)": "GURCHET SINGH (INC)", "KIRANBIR KAUR (CPI)": "KIRANBIR KAUR (CPI)", "HARCHAND SINGH (IND)": "HARCHAND SINGH (IND)", "SWARAN SINGH (BSP)": "SWARAN SINGH (BSP)", "SARBJEET SINGH MAKKAR (SAD)": "SARBJEET SINGH MAKKAR (SAD)", "KANWALJIT SINGH LALLY (INC)": "KANWALJIT SINGH LALLY (INC)", "NUMBERDAR SURJIT SINGH PARHAR (BSP)": "NUMBERDAR SURJIT SINGH PARHAR (BSP)", "MANOJ KUMAR (IND)": "MANOJ KUMAR (IND)", "JASDYAL SINGH JAS (IND)": "JASDYAL SINGH JAS (IND)", "KULWINDER SINGH (DBSP)": "KULWINDER SINGH (DBSP)", "JAGBIR SINGH BRAR (SAD)": "JAGBIR SINGH BRAR (SAD)", "GURKANWAL KAUR (INC)": "GURKANWAL KAUR (INC)", "KAPIL BATRA (BSP)": "KAPIL BATRA (BSP)", "KEWAL SINGH (CPM)": "KEWAL SINGH (CPM)", "ANIL DUTTA (IND)": "ANIL DUTTA (IND)", "RAMESH SINGLA (IND)": "RAMESH SINGLA (IND)", "ONKAR DASS (JKNPP)": "ONKAR DASS (JKNPP)", "GURCHARAN SINGH (IND)": "GURCHARAN SINGH (IND)", "JASWANT SINGH (IND)": "JASWANT SINGH (IND)", "MANJIT KAUR (BSP(A))": "MANJIT KAUR (BSP(A))", "GURBINDER SINGH (BGTD)": "GURBINDER SINGH (BGTD)", "RAM SAROOP (DBSP)": "RAM SAROOP (DBSP)", "NARINDER PAL SINGH (JM)": "NARINDER PAL SINGH (JM)", "K.D BHANDARI (BJP)": "K.D BHANDARI (BJP)", "AVTAR HENRY (INC)": "AVTAR HENRY (INC)", "BACHAN LAL (BSP)": "BACHAN LAL (BSP)", "DHARMINDER KUMAR (IND)": "DHARMINDER KUMAR (IND)", "BADRI NARAYAN JHA (BJSH)": "BADRI NARAYAN JHA (BJSH)", "RASHPAL KOMAL (DBSP)": "RASHPAL KOMAL (DBSP)", "SURJIT SINGH (JM)": "SURJIT SINGH (JM)", "MANORANJAN KALIA (BJP)": "MANORANJAN KALIA (BJP)", "TAJINDER SINGH BITTU (INC)": "TAJINDER SINGH BITTU (INC)", "SHITAL VIJ (IND)": "SHITAL VIJ (IND)", "ASHOK KUMAR (BSP)": "ASHOK KUMAR (BSP)", "MALWINDERWANT SINGH (LBP)": "MALWINDERWANT SINGH (LBP)", "BRIJ MOHAN (IND)": "BRIJ MOHAN (IND)", "DHARMINDER (IND)": "DHARMINDER (IND)", "PANKAJ SONI (IND)": "PANKAJ SONI (IND)", "PYARE LAL (IND)": "PYARE LAL (IND)", "SHAM SHARMA (PVCP)": "SHAM SHARMA (PVCP)", "PARMINDER SINGH (LJP)": "PARMINDER SINGH (LJP)", "OM PARKASH (IND)": "OM PARKASH (IND)", "MANINDERJIT SINGH (BGTD)": "MANINDERJIT SINGH (BGTD)", "CHUNI LAL BHAGAT (BJP)": "CHUNI LAL BHAGAT (BJP)", "MOHINDER SINGH K.P (INC)": "MOHINDER SINGH K.P (INC)", "RAJ KUMAR HANS (BSP)": "RAJ KUMAR HANS (BSP)", "HARBHAJAN LAKHA (IND)": "HARBHAJAN LAKHA (IND)", "VINOD KUMAR MODI (BSP(A))": "VINOD KUMAR MODI (BSP(A))", "PARAMJIT (LJP)": "PARAMJIT (LJP)", "KASHMIR SINGH (JD(S))": "KASHMIR SINGH (JD(S))", "GEORGE (DBSP)": "GEORGE (DBSP)", "AVINASH CHANDER (SAD)": "AVINASH CHANDER (SAD)", "CH JAGJIT SINGH (INC)": "CH JAGJIT SINGH (INC)", "RAM PARKASH (BSP)": "RAM PARKASH (BSP)", "RAJINDER KUMAR (IND)": "RAJINDER KUMAR (IND)", "KASHMIR SINGH GHUGH SHORE (IND)": "KASHMIR SINGH GHUGH SHORE (IND)", "MAKHAN LAL (IND)": "MAKHAN LAL (IND)", "RAJ PAL SONDI (BSP(A))": "RAJ PAL SONDI (BSP(A))", "MOHAN LAL (IND)": "MOHAN LAL (IND)", "MOHINDER SINGH HAMIRA (DBSP)": "MOHINDER SINGH HAMIRA (DBSP)", "KARNAIL CHAND (RPI)": "KARNAIL CHAND (RPI)", "DES RAJ JASSAL (IND)": "DES RAJ JASSAL (IND)", "BALKAR SINGH (IND)": "BALKAR SINGH (IND)", "HARIMITTER (IND)": "HARIMITTER (IND)", "AJIT SINGH KOHAR (SAD)": "AJIT SINGH KOHAR (SAD)", "LTCOL C D SINGH KAMBOJ (INC)": "LTCOL C D SINGH KAMBOJ (INC)", "BALWANT SINGH LOHIAN (LBP)": "BALWANT SINGH LOHIAN (LBP)", "BALWINDER SINGH (BSP)": "BALWINDER SINGH (BSP)", "PRITAM CHAND MALSIAN (BSP(A))": "PRITAM CHAND MALSIAN (BSP(A))", "BIKKAR SINGH (IND)": "BIKKAR SINGH (IND)", "SURJIT SINGH (IND)": "SURJIT SINGH (IND)", "JOGINDER SINGH (DBSP)": "JOGINDER SINGH (DBSP)", "AMARJIT SINGH SAMRA (INC)": "AMARJIT SINGH SAMRA (INC)", "KULDIP SINGH WADALA (SAD)": "KULDIP SINGH WADALA (SAD)", "M.P SINGH GORAYA (BSP)": "M.P SINGH GORAYA (BSP)", "GURDIAL SINGH (CPI)": "GURDIAL SINGH (CPI)", "RAMAN KUMAR (SHS)": "RAMAN KUMAR (SHS)", "JOGINDER SINGH SIANIWAL (BSP(A))": "JOGINDER SINGH SIANIWAL (BSP(A))", "GURDIP SINGH BHULLAR (SAD)": "GURDIP SINGH BHULLAR (SAD)", "GURBINDER SINGH ATWAL (INC)": "GURBINDER SINGH ATWAL (INC)", "LEKH RAJ (BSP)": "LEKH RAJ (BSP)", "GURMEL SINGH JOHAL (CPM)": "GURMEL SINGH JOHAL (CPM)", "TARSEM PETER (IND)": "TARSEM PETER (IND)", "SURJIT BEETA (IND)": "SURJIT BEETA (IND)", "KAMALJIT SINGH (IND)": "KAMALJIT SINGH (IND)", "SAT PAL DHUGGAR (IND)": "SAT PAL DHUGGAR (IND)", "SUBEDAR MAJOR SINGH (SAD(M))": "SUBEDAR MAJOR SINGH (SAD(M))", "HARBANS KAUR (IND)": "HARBANS KAUR (IND)", "SHASI (IND)": "SHASI (IND)", "MOHAN LAL (SAD)": "MOHAN LAL (SAD)", "TARLOCHAN SINGH (INC)": "TARLOCHAN SINGH (INC)", "PARVEEN KUMAR (BSP)": "PARVEEN KUMAR (BSP)", "BALWINDER PAL (CPM)": "BALWINDER PAL (CPM)", "PAKHAR SINGH (IND)": "PAKHAR SINGH (IND)", "MAKHAN SINGH (IND)": "MAKHAN SINGH (IND)", "HARPAL SINGH (IND)": "HARPAL SINGH (IND)", "SWARAN SINGH (PBLP)": "SWARAN SINGH (PBLP)", "BALDEV SINGH GHAI (IND)": "BALDEV SINGH GHAI (IND)", "YASH PAL ATWAL (DBSP)": "YASH PAL ATWAL (DBSP)", "JATINDER SINGH KARIHA (SAD)": "JATINDER SINGH KARIHA (SAD)", "PARKASH SINGH (INC)": "PARKASH SINGH (INC)", "VINOD KUMAR (BSP)": "VINOD KUMAR (BSP)", "KULWINDER SINGH (IND)": "KULWINDER SINGH (IND)", "HARJINDER SINGH (NCP)": "HARJINDER SINGH (NCP)", "MEENA CHAUDHARY (IND)": "MEENA CHAUDHARY (IND)", "SATPAL (IND)": "SATPAL (IND)", "MAHINDER SINGH (DBSP)": "MAHINDER SINGH (DBSP)", "NASIB CHAND (LJP)": "NASIB CHAND (LJP)", "SUCHA BHAURIA (IND)": "SUCHA BHAURIA (IND)", "SARWAN SINGH (SAD)": "SARWAN SINGH (SAD)", "SANTOKH SIGNH CHAUDHARY (INC)": "SANTOKH SIGNH CHAUDHARY (INC)", "SOHAN LAL (BSP)": "SOHAN LAL (BSP)", "TEJ PARTAP MOMI (PBLP)": "TEJ PARTAP MOMI (PBLP)", "NANAK DASS (LJP)": "NANAK DASS (LJP)", "AMARJIT SINGH (IND)": "AMARJIT SINGH (IND)", "SUKHPAL SINGH (INC)": "SUKHPAL SINGH (INC)", "JAGIR KAUR (SAD)": "JAGIR KAUR (SAD)", "BALKAR SINGH (BGTD)": "BALKAR SINGH (BGTD)", "TILAK RAJ (BSP)": "TILAK RAJ (BSP)", "AMAR NATH (DBSP)": "AMAR NATH (DBSP)", "RANA RAJBANS KAUR (INC)": "RANA RAJBANS KAUR (INC)", "RAGHBIR SINGH (SAD)": "RAGHBIR SINGH (SAD)", "JIA LAL NAHAR (BSP(A))": "JIA LAL NAHAR (BSP(A))", "SUKHWINDER SINGH (BSP)": "SUKHWINDER SINGH (BSP)", "BALWINDER SINGH (IND)": "BALWINDER SINGH (IND)", "MOHAN SINGH (IND)": "MOHAN SINGH (IND)", "MANGAL SINGH (IND)": "MANGAL SINGH (IND)", "DARSHAN SINGH (IND)": "DARSHAN SINGH (IND)", "AMAR SINGH (IND)": "AMAR SINGH (IND)", "ARJAN SINGH (IND)": "ARJAN SINGH (IND)", "GULZAR SINGH (IND)": "GULZAR SINGH (IND)", "UPINDERJIT KAUR (SAD)": "UPINDERJIT KAUR (SAD)", "NAVTEJ SINGH (INC)": "NAVTEJ SINGH (INC)", "BALWANT SINGH SULTANPURI (BSP(A))": "BALWANT SINGH SULTANPURI (BSP(A))", "GURDAS RAM (BSP)": "GURDAS RAM (BSP)", "RANJIT SINGH (IND)": "RANJIT SINGH (IND)", "SWARNA RAM (BJP)": "SWARNA RAM (BJP)", "JOGINDER SINGH MANN (INC)": "JOGINDER SINGH MANN (INC)", "HARBHAJAN SINGH (BSP)": "HARBHAJAN SINGH (BSP)", "JASBIR SINGH (IND)": "JASBIR SINGH (IND)", "SUCHA SINGH (SAD(M))": "SUCHA SINGH (SAD(M))", "ASHWANI KUMAR (SHS)": "ASHWANI KUMAR (SHS)", "TULSI RAM KHOSLA (BSP(A))": "TULSI RAM KHOSLA (BSP(A))", "SANTOKH SINGH (DBSP)": "SANTOKH SINGH (DBSP)", "NAND LAL (SAD)": "NAND LAL (SAD)", "SANTOSH KUMARI (INC)": "SANTOSH KUMARI (INC)", "HARGOPAL SINGH (BSP)": "HARGOPAL SINGH (BSP)", "MAHAN SINGH (CPM)": "MAHAN SINGH (CPM)", "MANDHIR SINGH (SAD(M))": "MANDHIR SINGH (SAD(M))", "RAM LOK SINGH (IND)": "RAM LOK SINGH (IND)", "DILBAG CHAND (BSP(A))": "DILBAG CHAND (BSP(A))", "RANBIR SINGH BHATTI (IND)": "RANBIR SINGH BHATTI (IND)", "AVTAR SINGH (IND)": "AVTAR SINGH (IND)", "RAM SHAH (IND)": "RAM SHAH (IND)", "LOV KUMAR GOLDY (INC)": "LOV KUMAR GOLDY (INC)", "MOHINDER PAL MANN (BJP)": "MOHINDER PAL MANN (BJP)", "RASHPAL SINGH RAJU (BSP)": "RASHPAL SINGH RAJU (BSP)", "DARSHAN SINGH MATTU (CPM)": "DARSHAN SINGH MATTU (CPM)", "PARS RAM (IND)": "PARS RAM (IND)", "GURDEEP SINGH (IND)": "GURDEEP SINGH (IND)", "JATINDER KUMAR (SHS)": "JATINDER KUMAR (SHS)", "SOHAN SINGH THANDAL (SAD)": "SOHAN SINGH THANDAL (SAD)", "DR DILBAG RAI (INC)": "DR DILBAG RAI (INC)", "AVTAR SINGH KARIMPURI (BSP)": "AVTAR SINGH KARIMPURI (BSP)", "ANMOL SINGH (IND)": "ANMOL SINGH (IND)", "NIRMAL SINGH HAKUMATPURI (IND)": "NIRMAL SINGH HAKUMATPURI (IND)", "DALJIT SINGH (IND)": "DALJIT SINGH (IND)", "TIKSHAN SUD (BJP)": "TIKSHAN SUD (BJP)", "CHARANJIT SINGH CHANNI (INC)": "CHARANJIT SINGH CHANNI (INC)", "GURDEV SINGH SAINI (DHANOTA) (BSP)": "GURDEV SINGH SAINI (DHANOTA) (BSP)", "VARINDER SINGH BAINS (IND)": "VARINDER SINGH BAINS (IND)", "SANDEEP SINGH SAINI (IND)": "SANDEEP SINGH SAINI (IND)", "ADARSH GUPTA (LJP)": "ADARSH GUPTA (LJP)", "RAJINDER KUMAR (SHS)": "RAJINDER KUMAR (SHS)", "RAJ KUMAR (IND)": "RAJ KUMAR (IND)", "MANJIT SINGH (IND)": "MANJIT SINGH (IND)", "RAMESH CHAND (IND)": "RAMESH CHAND (IND)", "PAWAN KUMAR (DBSP)": "PAWAN KUMAR (DBSP)", "SADHU SINGH SAINI (IND)": "SADHU SINGH SAINI (IND)", "MOHINDER KAUR (SAD)": "MOHINDER KAUR (SAD)", "CHOUDHARY RAM LUBHAYA (INC)": "CHOUDHARY RAM LUBHAYA (INC)", "BHAGWAN SINGH CHAUHAN (BSP)": "BHAGWAN SINGH CHAUHAN (BSP)", "GURPAL CHAND (IND)": "GURPAL CHAND (IND)", "OM PARKASH JAKHU (LJP)": "OM PARKASH JAKHU (LJP)", "KAMAL JIT SINGH (IND)": "KAMAL JIT SINGH (IND)", "SANGAT SINGH GILZIAN (IND)": "SANGAT SINGH GILZIAN (IND)", "CHAUDHRI BALBIR SINGH MIANI (SAD)": "CHAUDHRI BALBIR SINGH MIANI (SAD)", "SUPINDER KAUR KALKAT CHEEMA (INC)": "SUPINDER KAUR KALKAT CHEEMA (INC)", "CAPT RAN SINGH (LBP)": "CAPT RAN SINGH (LBP)", "ADVOCATE JASPAL SINGH MANJHPUR (SAD(M))": "ADVOCATE JASPAL SINGH MANJHPUR (SAD(M))", "DES RAJ DHUGGA (SAD)": "DES RAJ DHUGGA (SAD)", "JASBIR SINGH PAL (INC)": "JASBIR SINGH PAL (INC)", "SHAMSHER SINGH (BSP)": "SHAMSHER SINGH (BSP)", "HARBHAJAN KAUR (IND)": "HARBHAJAN KAUR (IND)", "ASHOK KUMAR MALIK (DBSP)": "ASHOK KUMAR MALIK (DBSP)", "AMARJIT SINGH SAHI (BJP)": "AMARJIT SINGH SAHI (BJP)", "RAMESH CHANDER DOGRA (INC)": "RAMESH CHANDER DOGRA (INC)", "UJAGAR SINGH (BSP)": "UJAGAR SINGH (BSP)", "ARUNESH KUMAR (BJP)": "ARUNESH KUMAR (BJP)", "RAJNISH KUMAR (INC)": "RAJNISH KUMAR (INC)", "DARSHNA KUMARI (BSP)": "DARSHNA KUMARI (BSP)", "JAI SINGH (BJSH)": "JAI SINGH (BJSH)", "SURESH KUMAR (SJP(R))": "SURESH KUMAR (SJP(R))", "GURDEEP SINGH (DBSP)": "GURDEEP SINGH (DBSP)", "GURDEEP SINGH BHAINI (INC)": "GURDEEP SINGH BHAINI (INC)", "BHAG SINGH MALLAH (SAD)": "BHAG SINGH MALLAH (SAD)", "GURDEEP SINGH MOTI (CPI)": "GURDEEP SINGH MOTI (CPI)", "RAVINDER PAL SINGH (IND)": "RAVINDER PAL SINGH (IND)", "HARBANS SINGH (IND)": "HARBANS SINGH (IND)", "BIKRAM PAL (BSP)": "BIKRAM PAL (BSP)", "INDERJIT SINGH (IND)": "INDERJIT SINGH (IND)", "NARINDER SINGH (IND)": "NARINDER SINGH (IND)", "GURMAIL SINGH SIDHWAN BET (BSP(A))": "GURMAIL SINGH SIDHWAN BET (BSP(A))", "JATINDER PAL (IND)": "JATINDER PAL (IND)", "HARMOHINDER SINGH 'PARDHAAN' (INC)": "HARMOHINDER SINGH 'PARDHAAN' (INC)", "RANJIT SINGH 'TALWANDI' (SAD)": "RANJIT SINGH 'TALWANDI' (SAD)", "RAJWINDER SINGH (IND)": "RAJWINDER SINGH (IND)", "TARSEM JODHAN (CPI(ML)(L))": "TARSEM JODHAN (CPI(ML)(L))", "BALJIT SINGH (IND)": "BALJIT SINGH (IND)", "TARLOCHAN SINGH (IND)": "TARLOCHAN SINGH (IND)", "DARSHAN SINGH SHIVALIK (SAD)": "DARSHAN SINGH SHIVALIK (SAD)", "MALKIAT SINGH DAKHA (INC)": "MALKIAT SINGH DAKHA (INC)", "PARKASH SINGH JANDIALI (BSP)": "PARKASH SINGH JANDIALI (BSP)", "AMARJEET MATTU (CPM)": "AMARJEET MATTU (CPM)", "HARINDER SINGH KHALSA (IND)": "HARINDER SINGH KHALSA (IND)", "BALDEV SINGH (IND)": "BALDEV SINGH (IND)", "DHARAM PAUL MEHMI (IND)": "DHARAM PAUL MEHMI (IND)", "KARTINDER PAL SINGH (IND)": "KARTINDER PAL SINGH (IND)", "KAMLESH PARSAD (APP)": "KAMLESH PARSAD (APP)", "GURNAM SINGH (LJP)": "GURNAM SINGH (LJP)", "BALDEV SINGH (BJSH)": "BALDEV SINGH (BJSH)", "SHINGARA SINGH (IND)": "SHINGARA SINGH (IND)", "JASBIR SINGH KHANGURA (INC)": "JASBIR SINGH KHANGURA (INC)", "JAGDISH SINGH GARCHA (SAD)": "JAGDISH SINGH GARCHA (SAD)", "JASWANT SINGH (BSP)": "JASWANT SINGH (BSP)", "MAAN SINGH (IND)": "MAAN SINGH (IND)", "SHINDER SINGH (CPI(ML)(L))": "SHINDER SINGH (CPI(ML)(L))", "PUPINDER SINGH (IND)": "PUPINDER SINGH (IND)", "DHARAMJIT SINGH (IND)": "DHARAMJIT SINGH (IND)", "TARSEM LAL KHOSLA (IND)": "TARSEM LAL KHOSLA (IND)", "HARISH BEDI (BJP)": "HARISH BEDI (BJP)", "RAKESH PANDEY (INC)": "RAKESH PANDEY (INC)", "MADAN LAL BAGGA (IND)": "MADAN LAL BAGGA (IND)", "RAMANJIT LALLY (BSP)": "RAMANJIT LALLY (BSP)", "HARVINDER HAPPY (IND)": "HARVINDER HAPPY (IND)", "SACHIN TANDON (NCP)": "SACHIN TANDON (NCP)", "DAVINDER SINGH (JM)": "DAVINDER SINGH (JM)", "MOHAMMAD NASIM ANSARI (SP)": "MOHAMMAD NASIM ANSARI (SP)", "JASPAL SINGH WALIA (IND)": "JASPAL SINGH WALIA (IND)", "SURAJ WALIA (IND)": "SURAJ WALIA (IND)", "RAKESH JAIN (LJP)": "RAKESH JAIN (LJP)", "PARDEEP JINDAL (BJSH)": "PARDEEP JINDAL (BJSH)", "RAVINDER KUMAR (JKNPP)": "RAVINDER KUMAR (JKNPP)", "ASHA (IND)": "ASHA (IND)", "HARISH RAI DHANDA (SAD)": "HARISH RAI DHANDA (SAD)", "HARNAM DAS JOHAR (INC)": "HARNAM DAS JOHAR (INC)", "KHARATI LAL (BSP)": "KHARATI LAL (BSP)", "PROF JAGMOHAN SINGH (SAD(M))": "PROF JAGMOHAN SINGH (SAD(M))", "RULDU SINGH PARMAR (IND)": "RULDU SINGH PARMAR (IND)", "JASWINDER SINGH (IND)": "JASWINDER SINGH (IND)", "KAWALJIT SINGH NARULA (LJP)": "KAWALJIT SINGH NARULA (LJP)", "ANANTDEEP SINGH (IND)": "ANANTDEEP SINGH (IND)", "DAVINDER KUMAR (IND)": "DAVINDER KUMAR (IND)", "GULSHAN KUMAR (IND)": "GULSHAN KUMAR (IND)", "SATISH KUMAR (IND)": "SATISH KUMAR (IND)", "BALBIR KUMAR (BJSH)": "BALBIR KUMAR (BJSH)", "SAT PAL GOSAIN (BJP)": "SAT PAL GOSAIN (BJP)", "SURINDER KUMAR (INC)": "SURINDER KUMAR (INC)", "USHA (BSP)": "USHA (BSP)", "BALVINDER SINGH (SAD(M))": "BALVINDER SINGH (SAD(M))", "BOBBY (IND)": "BOBBY (IND)", "LAL CHAND RAO (IND)": "LAL CHAND RAO (IND)", "MOHINDER SINGH (NCP)": "MOHINDER SINGH (NCP)", "VARJINDER KUMAR MALHOTRA (IND)": "VARJINDER KUMAR MALHOTRA (IND)", "SUNIL KUMAR (IND)": "SUNIL KUMAR (IND)", "MANINDER SINGH (LJP)": "MANINDER SINGH (LJP)", "GURBINDER SOOD (JKNPP)": "GURBINDER SOOD (JKNPP)", "NIRMAL SINGH (IND)": "NIRMAL SINGH (IND)", "MANJIT SINGH (BGTD)": "MANJIT SINGH (BGTD)", "TEJA SINGH (IND)": "TEJA SINGH (IND)", "GAURAV GUPTA (IND)": "GAURAV GUPTA (IND)", "HIRA SINGH GABRIA (SAD)": "HIRA SINGH GABRIA (SAD)", "MALKIT SINGH BIRMI (INC)": "MALKIT SINGH BIRMI (INC)", "GURMAIL SINGH (BSP)": "GURMAIL SINGH (BSP)", "SHAMBU KUMAR SINGH (JM)": "SHAMBU KUMAR SINGH (JM)", "PARMINDER SINGH (RJD)": "PARMINDER SINGH (RJD)", "KIRPAL SINGH (IND)": "KIRPAL SINGH (IND)", "JASBIR SINGH THETHI (IND)": "JASBIR SINGH THETHI (IND)", "GURNAM SINGH CHAUHAN (IND)": "GURNAM SINGH CHAUHAN (IND)", "VARINDER KUMAR (IND)": "VARINDER KUMAR (IND)", "SUNDER LAL (SP)": "SUNDER LAL (SP)", "KUNAL (IND)": "KUNAL (IND)", "RAM PARKASH (NCP)": "RAM PARKASH (NCP)", "KISHORI LAL MEHTA (IND)": "KISHORI LAL MEHTA (IND)", "HARDEEP SINGH SAINI (IND)": "HARDEEP SINGH SAINI (IND)", "SATWANT SINGH (IND)": "SATWANT SINGH (IND)", "SHEELA (IND)": "SHEELA (IND)", "AZAD SHARMA (APP)": "AZAD SHARMA (APP)", "TEJ PARKASH SINGH (INC)": "TEJ PARKASH SINGH (INC)", "MAHESHINDER SINGH GREWAL (SAD)": "MAHESHINDER SINGH GREWAL (SAD)", "JAGJIVAN PAL SINGH GILL (IND)": "JAGJIVAN PAL SINGH GILL (IND)", "KARTAR SINGH (CPI)": "KARTAR SINGH (CPI)", "AMRIK SINGH (IND)": "AMRIK SINGH (IND)", "GURCHET SINGH (BSP)": "GURCHET SINGH (BSP)", "RAJINDER SINGH (IND)": "RAJINDER SINGH (IND)", "BARJINDER SINGH JANDU (IND)": "BARJINDER SINGH JANDU (IND)", "HARJIT SINGH (RSP)": "HARJIT SINGH (RSP)", "ISHAR SINGH (INC)": "ISHAR SINGH (INC)", "INDER IQBAL SINGH ATWAL (SAD)": "INDER IQBAL SINGH ATWAL (SAD)", "BALWINDER SINGH LALKA (LBP)": "BALWINDER SINGH LALKA (LBP)", "GIAN SINGH (BSP)": "GIAN SINGH (BSP)", "HARJIT SINGH BAWA (LJP)": "HARJIT SINGH BAWA (LJP)", "JAGJIWAN SINGH (SAD)": "JAGJIWAN SINGH (SAD)", "AMRIK SINGH S/O CHUHAR SINGH (INC)": "AMRIK SINGH S/O CHUHAR SINGH (INC)", "AVTAR SINGH S/O PIARA SINGH (IND)": "AVTAR SINGH S/O PIARA SINGH (IND)", "GURDIAL SINGH (IND)": "GURDIAL SINGH (IND)", "AVTAR SINGH S/O SARDUL SINGH (RSP)": "AVTAR SINGH S/O SARDUL SINGH (RSP)", "AMRIK SINGH SEKHON (IND)": "AMRIK SINGH SEKHON (IND)", "HIMMAT SINGH (SAD(M))": "HIMMAT SINGH (SAD(M))", "AMRIK SINGH S/O PRITPAL SINGH (IND)": "AMRIK SINGH S/O PRITPAL SINGH (IND)", "BIKRAMJIT SINGH (SAD)": "BIKRAMJIT SINGH (SAD)", "SHAMSHER SINGH DULLO (INC)": "SHAMSHER SINGH DULLO (INC)", "LAKHA RAM (IND)": "LAKHA RAM (IND)", "RANJIT SINGH (RSP)": "RANJIT SINGH (RSP)", "PIARA SINGH (IND)": "PIARA SINGH (IND)", "BHAJAN SINGH (IND)": "BHAJAN SINGH (IND)", "DALWARA SINGH (IND)": "DALWARA SINGH (IND)", "KANWAR PAL SINGH (INC)": "KANWAR PAL SINGH (INC)", "MADAN MOHAN MITTAL (BJP)": "MADAN MOHAN MITTAL (BJP)", "GURDIAL SINGH (CPM)": "GURDIAL SINGH (CPM)", "JAGAT SINGH (BSP)": "JAGAT SINGH (BSP)", "GIAN CHAND (IND)": "GIAN CHAND (IND)", "DIWAN CHAND (BJSH)": "DIWAN CHAND (BJSH)", "MAGHAR SINGH (LJP)": "MAGHAR SINGH (LJP)", "KULDEEP RAI (IND)": "KULDEEP RAI (IND)", "SANT AJIT SINGH (SAD)": "SANT AJIT SINGH (SAD)", "RAMESH DUTT SHARMA (INC)": "RAMESH DUTT SHARMA (INC)", "TARLOCHAN SINGH (BSP)": "TARLOCHAN SINGH (BSP)", "HARVINDER SINGH (SAD(M))": "HARVINDER SINGH (SAD(M))", "V P SAINI (AIFB)": "V P SAINI (AIFB)", "JAGJIT SINGH (NCP)": "JAGJIT SINGH (NCP)", "JASPAL SINGH (BGTD)": "JASPAL SINGH (BGTD)", "CHARANJIT SINGH CHANNI (IND)": "CHARANJIT SINGH CHANNI (IND)", "SATWANT KAUR (SAD)": "SATWANT KAUR (SAD)", "MANMOHAN SINGH (INC)": "MANMOHAN SINGH (INC)", "CHARANJIT SINGH GHAI (BSP)": "CHARANJIT SINGH GHAI (BSP)", "BHAG SINGH (IND)": "BHAG SINGH (IND)", "AJMER SINGH (BSP(A))": "AJMER SINGH (BSP(A))", "SUKHJIT KAUR (IND)": "SUKHJIT KAUR (IND)", "SAVINDER SINGH (IND)": "SAVINDER SINGH (IND)", "UJAGGAR SINGH (SAD)": "UJAGGAR SINGH (SAD)", "JAGMOHAN SINGH (INC)": "JAGMOHAN SINGH (INC)", "RAJINDER SINGH (BSP)": "RAJINDER SINGH (BSP)", "KULDEEP SINGH (SAD(M))": "KULDEEP SINGH (SAD(M))", "GURDEV SINGH (BSP(A))": "GURDEV SINGH (BSP(A))", "BALBIR SINGH (INC)": "BALBIR SINGH (INC)", "JASJIT SINGH (SAD)": "JASJIT SINGH (SAD)", "TARLOCHAN SINGH MANN (IND)": "TARLOCHAN SINGH MANN (IND)", "JASWINDER SINGH (BSP)": "JASWINDER SINGH (BSP)", "ANIL KUMAR (BJSH)": "ANIL KUMAR (BJSH)", "NACHHATAR SINGH BAIDWAN (IND)": "NACHHATAR SINGH BAIDWAN (IND)", "JOGINDER KAUR SAHOTA (SAD(M))": "JOGINDER KAUR SAHOTA (SAD(M))", "PARMOD KUMAR (IND)": "PARMOD KUMAR (IND)", "GURNAM SINGH SEWAK (IND)": "GURNAM SINGH SEWAK (IND)", "SWARN SINGH BANGAR (BSP(A))": "SWARN SINGH BANGAR (BSP(A))", "ISHWAR KAUR (IND)": "ISHWAR KAUR (IND)", "KANWALJIT SINGH (SAD)": "KANWALJIT SINGH (SAD)", "RAKESH SHARMA (INC)": "RAKESH SHARMA (INC)", "JASVIR SINGH (BSP)": "JASVIR SINGH (BSP)", "AVTAR SINGH (SAD(M))": "AVTAR SINGH (SAD(M))", "SUBHASH RANA (IND)": "SUBHASH RANA (IND)", "SHAM KUMAR (ARWP)": "SHAM KUMAR (ARWP)", "AVTAR SINGH GHUMAN (IND)": "AVTAR SINGH GHUMAN (IND)", "RAJ KHURANA (BJP)": "RAJ KHURANA (BJP)", "HARDIAL SINGH KAMBOJ (INC)": "HARDIAL SINGH KAMBOJ (INC)", "ASHOK ARORA (BSP)": "ASHOK ARORA (BSP)", "AVTAR SINGH HARPALPUR (IND)": "AVTAR SINGH HARPALPUR (IND)", "INDERJIT SINGH (CPM)": "INDERJIT SINGH (CPM)", "KARNAIL SINGH PANJOLI (IND)": "KARNAIL SINGH PANJOLI (IND)", "RANJAN HANS (IND)": "RANJAN HANS (IND)", "DR SURJIT SINGH (IND)": "DR SURJIT SINGH (IND)", "MADAN LAL THEKEDAR (IND)": "MADAN LAL THEKEDAR (IND)", "AJAIB SINGH MUKHMAILPURA (SAD)": "AJAIB SINGH MUKHMAILPURA (SAD)", "JASJIT SINGH RANDHAWA (INC)": "JASJIT SINGH RANDHAWA (INC)", "BABA GURDEV SINGH (BSP)": "BABA GURDEV SINGH (BSP)", "GURSEV SINGH (IND)": "GURSEV SINGH (IND)", "JEET SINGH PAWAR (IND)": "JEET SINGH PAWAR (IND)", "PARAMJIT SINGH MANDOULI (SAD(M))": "PARAMJIT SINGH MANDOULI (SAD(M))", "KULWANT SINGH (IND)": "KULWANT SINGH (IND)", "LAL SINGH (INC)": "LAL SINGH (INC)", "HARMAIL SINGH TOHRA (SAD)": "HARMAIL SINGH TOHRA (SAD)", "SURESH MEHRA (BSP)": "SURESH MEHRA (BSP)", "AMRIK SINGH DEELWAL (IND)": "AMRIK SINGH DEELWAL (IND)", "RAM LAL SHARMA (IND)": "RAM LAL SHARMA (IND)", "AMRIK SINGH (SP)": "AMRIK SINGH (SP)", "SATNAM SINGH (SAD(M))": "SATNAM SINGH (SAD(M))", "RAM ISHAR SINGH (IND)": "RAM ISHAR SINGH (IND)", "NIRMAL SINGH (INC)": "NIRMAL SINGH (INC)", "HAMIR SINGH GHAGGA (SAD)": "HAMIR SINGH GHAGGA (SAD)", "PARAMJIT SINGH KAINTH (BSP)": "PARAMJIT SINGH KAINTH (BSP)", "BALA SINGH (IND)": "BALA SINGH (IND)", "JARNAIL SINGH (SAD(M))": "JARNAIL SINGH (SAD(M))", "HARBHAJAN LAL (IND)": "HARBHAJAN LAL (IND)", "HARDAM SINGH (IND)": "HARDAM SINGH (IND)", "RAJ KAUR (LJP)": "RAJ KAUR (LJP)", "BRAHM MAHINDRA (INC)": "BRAHM MAHINDRA (INC)", "SURJEET SINGH RAKHRA (SAD)": "SURJEET SINGH RAKHRA (SAD)", "RAM KUMAR SINGLA (BSP)": "RAM KUMAR SINGLA (BSP)", "NIRMAL SINGH (CPI)": "NIRMAL SINGH (CPI)", "MOHINDER PAL SINGH (SAD(M))": "MOHINDER PAL SINGH (SAD(M))", "JARNAIL SINGH (LJP)": "JARNAIL SINGH (LJP)", "RAWEL SINGH (IND)": "RAWEL SINGH (IND)", "RESHAM LAL (IND)": "RESHAM LAL (IND)", "PRABHJI PAL SINGH (IND)": "PRABHJI PAL SINGH (IND)", "DEV SINGH (IND)": "DEV SINGH (IND)", "SURINDER KUMAR (IND)": "SURINDER KUMAR (IND)", "KARAMJIT SINGH (IND)": "KARAMJIT SINGH (IND)", "SARWAN SINGH (IND)": "SARWAN SINGH (IND)", "AMARINDER SINGH (INC)": "AMARINDER SINGH (INC)", "SURJIT SINGH KOHLI (SAD)": "SURJIT SINGH KOHLI (SAD)", "DR BHAI PARAMJIT SINGH (BSP)": "DR BHAI PARAMJIT SINGH (BSP)", "LALIT KUMAR (IND)": "LALIT KUMAR (IND)", "RAJESH KUMAR (IND)": "RAJESH KUMAR (IND)", "OM PARKASH SHARMA (NCP)": "OM PARKASH SHARMA (NCP)", "JAGDISH SINGH (SAD(M))": "JAGDISH SINGH (SAD(M))", "RANJEET KAUR (IND)": "RANJEET KAUR (IND)", "HARISH KUMAR (IND)": "HARISH KUMAR (IND)", "MOHINDER SINGH (IND)": "MOHINDER SINGH (IND)", "RAM CHAND (IND)": "RAM CHAND (IND)", "RAKESH KUMAR (IND)": "RAKESH KUMAR (IND)", "YOGESH KUMAR (IND)": "YOGESH KUMAR (IND)", "NARESH JAGGI (RSP)": "NARESH JAGGI (RSP)", "BUDH SINGH (IND)": "BUDH SINGH (IND)", "CHARANJIT SINGH (IND)": "CHARANJIT SINGH (IND)", "SARDAR SINGH (IND)": "SARDAR SINGH (IND)", "AMARJIT KAUR (IND)": "AMARJIT KAUR (IND)", "RANDEEP SINGH (INC)": "RANDEEP SINGH (INC)", "NARINDER SINGH (SAD)": "NARINDER SINGH (SAD)", "MAHANT HARVINDER SINGH (IND)": "MAHANT HARVINDER SINGH (IND)", "BHAGWANT SINGH (BSP)": "BHAGWANT SINGH (BSP)", "PARAMJIT SINGH (IND)": "PARAMJIT SINGH (IND)", "KAUR CHAND (IND)": "KAUR CHAND (IND)", "JAGMOHAN (JJJKMC)": "JAGMOHAN (JJJKMC)", "ASHOK KUMAR (IND)": "ASHOK KUMAR (IND)", "NAJAM SINGH (IND)": "NAJAM SINGH (IND)", "JOGA SINGH (IND)": "JOGA SINGH (IND)", "SOHAN LAL (IND)": "SOHAN LAL (IND)", "SADHU SINGH (INC)": "SADHU SINGH (INC)", "SATWINDER KAUR (SAD)": "SATWINDER KAUR (SAD)", "JEET SINGH (BSP)": "JEET SINGH (BSP)", "BHAG SINGH (SAD(M))": "BHAG SINGH (SAD(M))", "LACHHMAN SINGH (CPI)": "LACHHMAN SINGH (CPI)", "GURMEET SINGH (IND)": "GURMEET SINGH (IND)", "BALWANT SINGH (IND)": "BALWANT SINGH (IND)", "BALVIR SINGH (IND)": "BALVIR SINGH (IND)", "RAM SINGH (LJP)": "RAM SINGH (LJP)", "CHAMEL SINGH (IND)": "CHAMEL SINGH (IND)", "DIDAR SINGH (SAD)": "DIDAR SINGH (SAD)", "DR HARBANS LAL (INC)": "DR HARBANS LAL (INC)", "EMAAN SINGH MAAN (SAD(M))": "EMAAN SINGH MAAN (SAD(M))", "MAJOR SINGH (BSP)": "MAJOR SINGH (BSP)", "RAVINDER SINGH (IND)": "RAVINDER SINGH (IND)", "PRITPAL SINGH (IND)": "PRITPAL SINGH (IND)", "PUSHPA KUMARI (IND)": "PUSHPA KUMARI (IND)", "RAM SINGH (RSP)": "RAM SINGH (RSP)", "REKHA RANI (NCP)": "REKHA RANI (NCP)", "CHANDERPARKASH NAGPAL (IND)": "CHANDERPARKASH NAGPAL (IND)", "HARBANS LAL (IND)": "HARBANS LAL (IND)", "IQBAL SINGH JHUNDAN (IND)": "IQBAL SINGH JHUNDAN (IND)", "MAI ROOP KAUR (INC)": "MAI ROOP KAUR (INC)", "GAGANJIT SINGH (SAD)": "GAGANJIT SINGH (SAD)", "DHANWANT SINGH (BSP)": "DHANWANT SINGH (BSP)", "MANINDER SINGH (CPI)": "MANINDER SINGH (CPI)", "KARNAIL SINGH (SAD(M))": "KARNAIL SINGH (SAD(M))", "LACHHAMAN SINGH (IND)": "LACHHAMAN SINGH (IND)", "AMAR SINGH (LJP)": "AMAR SINGH (LJP)", "MOHD SAMSAD (IND)": "MOHD SAMSAD (IND)", "IQBAL SINGH (IND)": "IQBAL SINGH (IND)", "BALJEET SINGH (IND)": "BALJEET SINGH (IND)", "MANJINDER SINGH (IND)": "MANJINDER SINGH (IND)", "RAZIA SULTANA (INC)": "RAZIA SULTANA (INC)", "ABDUL GHAFFAR (SAD)": "ABDUL GHAFFAR (SAD)", "PARMINDER SINGH (BSP)": "PARMINDER SINGH (BSP)", "GURPREET SINGH (SHS)": "GURPREET SINGH (SHS)", "MOHAMMAD ANWAR (IND)": "MOHAMMAD ANWAR (IND)", "BANT SINGH (IND)": "BANT SINGH (IND)", "MAQSOOD-UL-HAQ (IND)": "MAQSOOD-UL-HAQ (IND)", "HAJI SULEMAN (IND)": "HAJI SULEMAN (IND)", "HARCHAND KAUR (INC)": "HARCHAND KAUR (INC)", "GOBIND SINGH (SAD)": "GOBIND SINGH (SAD)", "SUKHTEJ KAUR (BSP)": "SUKHTEJ KAUR (BSP)", "AMARJIT SINGH KILA HAKIMA (SAD(M))": "AMARJIT SINGH KILA HAKIMA (SAD(M))", "DIDAR SINGH (IND)": "DIDAR SINGH (IND)", "JAGGA SINGH (IND)": "JAGGA SINGH (IND)", "SHAMSHER SINGH (LJP)": "SHAMSHER SINGH (LJP)", "KEWAL SINGH DHILLON (INC)": "KEWAL SINGH DHILLON (INC)", "MALKIT SINGH KEETU (SAD)": "MALKIT SINGH KEETU (SAD)", "HARINDER SINGH SEERA DHILLON (IND)": "HARINDER SINGH SEERA DHILLON (IND)", "MALKIT SINGH TUNG (BSP)": "MALKIT SINGH TUNG (BSP)", "MALKIAT SINGH (IND)": "MALKIAT SINGH (IND)", "SURINDER SINGH SADDOWALIA (SAD(M))": "SURINDER SINGH SADDOWALIA (SAD(M))", "HARDAM SINGH WARAICH (IND)": "HARDAM SINGH WARAICH (IND)", "SINDER PAL (RSP)": "SINDER PAL (RSP)", "ANIL BHARTI (IND)": "ANIL BHARTI (IND)", "BALVIR SINGH GHUNAS (SAD)": "BALVIR SINGH GHUNAS (SAD)", "SURINDER KAUR BALIAN (INC)": "SURINDER KAUR BALIAN (INC)", "SARABJEET SINGH (IND)": "SARABJEET SINGH (IND)", "BALDEV SINGH (BSP)": "BALDEV SINGH (BSP)", "KHUSHIA SINGH (CPI)": "KHUSHIA SINGH (CPI)", "MAJAR SINGH (IND)": "MAJAR SINGH (IND)", "JARNAIL SINGH BHADAUR (IND)": "JARNAIL SINGH BHADAUR (IND)", "KULDIP SINGH BHATHAL (INC)": "KULDIP SINGH BHATHAL (INC)", "GOBIND SINGH LONGOWAL (SAD)": "GOBIND SINGH LONGOWAL (SAD)", "SIMRANJIT SINGH MANN (SAD(M))": "SIMRANJIT SINGH MANN (SAD(M))", "RAJWINDER KAUR ROZZY BHATHAL (IND)": "RAJWINDER KAUR ROZZY BHATHAL (IND)", "KARNAIL SINGH DULET (BSP)": "KARNAIL SINGH DULET (BSP)", "LABH SINGH AKLIA (CPI(ML)(L))": "LABH SINGH AKLIA (CPI(ML)(L))", "SURINDER PAL SINGH SIBIA (INC)": "SURINDER PAL SINGH SIBIA (INC)", "PRAKASH CHAND GARG (SAD)": "PRAKASH CHAND GARG (SAD)", "CHAMKAUR SINGH (CPM)": "CHAMKAUR SINGH (CPM)", "BHUPINDER SINGH (IND)": "BHUPINDER SINGH (IND)", "TALIB SINGH SANDHU (IND)": "TALIB SINGH SANDHU (IND)", "PRITAM SINGH (BSP(A))": "PRITAM SINGH (BSP(A))", "MANJU GILL (LJP)": "MANJU GILL (LJP)", "SURJIT SINGH DHIMAN (INC)": "SURJIT SINGH DHIMAN (INC)", "BALDEV SINGH MANN (SAD)": "BALDEV SINGH MANN (SAD)", "BHAGWAN SINGH (BSP)": "BHAGWAN SINGH (BSP)", "BABU SINGH (SAD(M))": "BABU SINGH (SAD(M))", "HARBHAGWAN BHIKHI (CPI(ML)(L))": "HARBHAGWAN BHIKHI (CPI(ML)(L))", "CHET SINGH ROGLA (BSP(A))": "CHET SINGH ROGLA (BSP(A))", "PARMINDER SINGH DHINDSA (SAD)": "PARMINDER SINGH DHINDSA (SAD)", "AMAN ARORA (INC)": "AMAN ARORA (INC)", "RAJINDER DEEPA (IND)": "RAJINDER DEEPA (IND)", "JAGJIT SINGH (BSP)": "JAGJIT SINGH (BSP)", "BANT SINGH (CPM)": "BANT SINGH (CPM)", "PARMINDER SINGH S/O LACHHMAN DASS (IND)": "PARMINDER SINGH S/O LACHHMAN DASS (IND)", "MALKIT SINGH (IND)": "MALKIT SINGH (IND)", "NARESH KUMAR (IND)": "NARESH KUMAR (IND)", "SUBEY RAM (IND)": "SUBEY RAM (IND)", "SHAHBAZ SINGH (SAD(M))": "SHAHBAZ SINGH (SAD(M))", "RAJINDER KAUR (INC)": "RAJINDER KAUR (INC)", "PROF PREM SINGH CHANDUMAJRA (SAD)": "PROF PREM SINGH CHANDUMAJRA (SAD)", "NARANJAN SINGH (IND)": "NARANJAN SINGH (IND)", "BALJIT SINGH (BSP)": "BALJIT SINGH (BSP)", "SATWANT SINGH (CPI)": "SATWANT SINGH (CPI)", "PREM SINGH (IND)": "PREM SINGH (IND)", "SUKHJINDER SINGH (LJP)": "SUKHJINDER SINGH (LJP)", "JAGTAR SINGH (IND)": "JAGTAR SINGH (IND)", "GIAN SINGH (SAD(M))": "GIAN SINGH (SAD(M))", "GURTEJ SINGH (SAD)": "GURTEJ SINGH (SAD)", "PARKASH SINGH BHATTI (INC)": "PARKASH SINGH BHATTI (INC)", "BABU RAM (IND)": "BABU RAM (IND)", "GIRDHARI LAL (BSP)": "GIRDHARI LAL (BSP)", "ACHHAR SINGH (CPM)": "ACHHAR SINGH (CPM)", "DALBIR SINGH (NCP)": "DALBIR SINGH (NCP)", "KARNAIL KAUR (IND)": "KARNAIL KAUR (IND)", "SUNIL KUMAR JAKHAR (INC)": "SUNIL KUMAR JAKHAR (INC)", "RAM KUMAR (BJP)": "RAM KUMAR (BJP)", "KASHMIR LAL (BSP)": "KASHMIR LAL (BSP)", "RAM KUMAR S/O SOHAN LAL (IND)": "RAM KUMAR S/O SOHAN LAL (IND)", "GURJANT SINGH (IND)": "GURJANT SINGH (IND)", "SURESH KUMAR SATIJA (IND)": "SURESH KUMAR SATIJA (IND)", "SUMAN (IND)": "SUMAN (IND)", "SURJEET KUMAR (BJP)": "SURJEET KUMAR (BJP)", "MOHINDER KUMAR (INC)": "MOHINDER KUMAR (INC)", "JASPINDER SINGH JAKHAR (IND)": "JASPINDER SINGH JAKHAR (IND)", "BANWARI LAL (BSP)": "BANWARI LAL (BSP)", "SURJIT KUMAR S/O SAHIB RAM (IND)": "SURJIT KUMAR S/O SAHIB RAM (IND)", "AMARJIT SINGH (DBSP)": "AMARJIT SINGH (DBSP)", "ARUN (IND)": "ARUN (IND)", "KRISHAN LAL (BJSH)": "KRISHAN LAL (BJSH)", "LAL CHAND (LPSP)": "LAL CHAND (LPSP)", "SHER SINGH (SAD)": "SHER SINGH (SAD)", "HANS RAJ JOSAN (INC)": "HANS RAJ JOSAN (INC)", "HANS RAJ (CPI)": "HANS RAJ (CPI)", "BOOTA SINGH (BSP)": "BOOTA SINGH (BSP)", "RAMESH SINGH (IND)": "RAMESH SINGH (IND)", "MUNSHA SINGH (IND)": "MUNSHA SINGH (IND)", "BAG CHAND (IND)": "BAG CHAND (IND)", "ANGREJ SINGH (IND)": "ANGREJ SINGH (IND)", "JAGDISH KUMAR (IND)": "JAGDISH KUMAR (IND)", "SHER CHAND (IND)": "SHER CHAND (IND)", "SURAIN SINGH (IND)": "SURAIN SINGH (IND)", "GURMEET SINGH (INC)": "GURMEET SINGH (INC)", "PARAMJIT SINGH SANDHU (SAD)": "PARAMJIT SINGH SANDHU (SAD)", "MOHAN SINGH PHALLIAN WALA (BSP)": "MOHAN SINGH PHALLIAN WALA (BSP)", "SURINDER KAMBOJ (SWAH WALA) (CPM)": "SURINDER KAMBOJ (SWAH WALA) (CPM)", "DHIAN SINGH MAND (SAD(M))": "DHIAN SINGH MAND (SAD(M))", "SONU KUMAR (IND)": "SONU KUMAR (IND)", "SAHAB SINGH (LJP)": "SAHAB SINGH (LJP)", "SURINDER PAL (IND)": "SURINDER PAL (IND)", "MANOJ MONGA (ABSR)": "MANOJ MONGA (ABSR)", "RATAN LAL (RPI)": "RATAN LAL (RPI)", "SUNIL KUMAR (RVNP)": "SUNIL KUMAR (RVNP)", "SUKHPAL SINGH (BJP)": "SUKHPAL SINGH (BJP)", "BAL MUKAND SHARMA (INC)": "BAL MUKAND SHARMA (INC)", "MUKHTIAR SINGH (BSP)": "MUKHTIAR SINGH (BSP)", "LAKHWINDER SINGH (SAD(M))": "LAKHWINDER SINGH (SAD(M))", "PURAN (IND)": "PURAN (IND)", "KANWARBIR INDER SINGH (IND)": "KANWARBIR INDER SINGH (IND)", "MATHURA DASS (PTSS)": "MATHURA DASS (PTSS)", "RAM SARUP SHARMA (APP)": "RAM SARUP SHARMA (APP)", "JANMEJA SINGH (SAD)": "JANMEJA SINGH (SAD)", "RAVINDER SINGH (INC)": "RAVINDER SINGH (INC)", "PARDEEP KUMAR (BSP)": "PARDEEP KUMAR (BSP)", "KULWINDER SINGH (LJP)": "KULWINDER SINGH (LJP)", "JASBIR SINGH BHULLAR (SAD(M))": "JASBIR SINGH BHULLAR (SAD(M))", "KANTA (IND)": "KANTA (IND)", "KULWANT RAI (IND)": "KULWANT RAI (IND)", "POORAN CHAND (APP)": "POORAN CHAND (APP)", "NARESH KUMAR (INC)": "NARESH KUMAR (INC)", "HARI SINGH ZIRA (SAD)": "HARI SINGH ZIRA (SAD)", "BALWANT SINGH (BSP)": "BALWANT SINGH (BSP)", "RASHPAL SINGH (IND)": "RASHPAL SINGH (IND)", "JASWINDER KAUR (IND)": "JASWINDER KAUR (IND)", "PUNJAB SINGH (LJP)": "PUNJAB SINGH (LJP)", "KANWAR PARTAP SINGH (IND)": "KANWAR PARTAP SINGH (IND)", "HARDIT SINGH (BSP(A))": "HARDIT SINGH (BSP(A))", "SEETAL SINGH (SAD)": "SEETAL SINGH (SAD)", "KEWAL SINGH (INC)": "KEWAL SINGH (INC)", "UJJAGAR SINGH (CPI)": "UJJAGAR SINGH (CPI)", "SHIVINDER SINGH (BSP)": "SHIVINDER SINGH (BSP)", "BALDEV SINGH GAGRA (SAD(M))": "BALDEV SINGH GAGRA (SAD(M))", "BALDEV SINGH DHARAMKOT (BSP(A))": "BALDEV SINGH DHARAMKOT (BSP(A))", "GURMAIL SINGH (IND)": "GURMAIL SINGH (IND)", "JOGINDER PAL JAIN (INC)": "JOGINDER PAL JAIN (INC)", "TOTA SINGH (SAD)": "TOTA SINGH (SAD)", "RANDHIR SINGH (CPI)": "RANDHIR SINGH (CPI)", "MEGHA SINGH (IND)": "MEGHA SINGH (IND)", "SUKHPAL SINGH (NCP)": "SUKHPAL SINGH (NCP)", "ANIL KUMAR (IND)": "ANIL KUMAR (IND)", "DARSHAN SINGH BRAR (KHOTE) (INC)": "DARSHAN SINGH BRAR (KHOTE) (INC)", "SADHU SINGH RAJIANA (SAD)": "SADHU SINGH RAJIANA (SAD)", "SUKHWINDER SINGH BRAR (LBP)": "SUKHWINDER SINGH BRAR (LBP)", "DARSHAN SINGH BRAR S/O S.GURDIAL SINGH (IND)": "DARSHAN SINGH BRAR S/O S.GURDIAL SINGH (IND)", "AJIT SINGH (IND)": "AJIT SINGH (IND)", "JARNAIL SINGH (SAD)": "JARNAIL SINGH (SAD)", "BABU SINGH (INC)": "BABU SINGH (INC)", "GURCHARAN SINGH (LBP)": "GURCHARAN SINGH (LBP)", "KEWAL SINGH (BSP)": "KEWAL SINGH (BSP)", "SEWAK SINGH (BSP(A))": "SEWAK SINGH (BSP(A))", "JOGINDER SINGH (INC)": "JOGINDER SINGH (INC)", "GURDEV SINGH BADAL (SAD)": "GURDEV SINGH BADAL (SAD)", "KEWAL SINGH PREMI (LBP)": "KEWAL SINGH PREMI (LBP)", "JASPAL SINGH (IND)": "JASPAL SINGH (IND)", "DARSHAN SINGH (BSP)": "DARSHAN SINGH (BSP)", "NIRMAL SINGH (LJP)": "NIRMAL SINGH (LJP)", "RIPJIT SINGH (INC)": "RIPJIT SINGH (INC)", "MANTAR SINGH (SAD)": "MANTAR SINGH (SAD)", "KRISHAN SINGLA (BSP)": "KRISHAN SINGLA (BSP)", "IKBAL SINGH (IND)": "IKBAL SINGH (IND)", "RANVIR SINGH (IND)": "RANVIR SINGH (IND)", "GURSEWAK SINGH (LBP)": "GURSEWAK SINGH (LBP)", "KULDEEP SINGH (IND)": "KULDEEP SINGH (IND)", "DIDAR SINGH (LJP)": "DIDAR SINGH (LJP)", "VARINDER (ABSR)": "VARINDER (ABSR)", "AVTAR SINGH BRAR (INC)": "AVTAR SINGH BRAR (INC)", "KUSHALDEEP SINGH (SAD)": "KUSHALDEEP SINGH (SAD)", "PAWANPREET SINGH (CPI)": "PAWANPREET SINGH (CPI)", "SOHAN SINGH (BSP)": "SOHAN SINGH (BSP)", "BOHAR SINGH (RJD)": "BOHAR SINGH (RJD)", "SADHON SINGH (SP)": "SADHON SINGH (SP)", "KULDEEP SINGH R/O FARIDKOT (LJP)": "KULDEEP SINGH R/O FARIDKOT (LJP)", "HARUN SINGH (AIDWC)": "HARUN SINGH (AIDWC)", "KULDEEP SINGH R/O MACHAKI MAL SINGH (IND)": "KULDEEP SINGH R/O MACHAKI MAL SINGH (IND)", "KANWARJIT SINGH (INC)": "KANWARJIT SINGH (INC)", "SUKHDARSHAN SINGH MARAR (SAD)": "SUKHDARSHAN SINGH MARAR (SAD)", "BHAI HARNIRPAL SINGH (IND)": "BHAI HARNIRPAL SINGH (IND)", "ANGREJ SINGH (BSP)": "ANGREJ SINGH (BSP)", "GURPREET SINGH (IND)": "GURPREET SINGH (IND)", "ROSHAN LAL (IND)": "ROSHAN LAL (IND)", "SUKHCHARAN SINGH (IND)": "SUKHCHARAN SINGH (IND)", "NEERAJ KUMAR (IND)": "NEERAJ KUMAR (IND)", "GURVINDER SINGH (IND)": "GURVINDER SINGH (IND)", "SHAM LAL (IND)": "SHAM LAL (IND)", "HARJINDER SINGH (IND)": "HARJINDER SINGH (IND)", "MANPREET SINGH BADAL (SAD)": "MANPREET SINGH BADAL (SAD)", "RAGHUBIR SINGH (INC)": "RAGHUBIR SINGH (INC)", "SANT SINGH BRAR (IND)": "SANT SINGH BRAR (IND)", "MANJEET KAUR (BSP)": "MANJEET KAUR (BSP)", "MAHINGA RAM (CPI)": "MAHINGA RAM (CPI)", "ATMA SINGH (IND)": "ATMA SINGH (IND)", "RAGHVIR SINGH (IND)": "RAGHVIR SINGH (IND)", "MEHAN SINGH (SAD(M))": "MEHAN SINGH (SAD(M))", "SANT SINGH (IND)": "SANT SINGH (IND)", "GURJIT SINGH (IND)": "GURJIT SINGH (IND)", "NAGINDER SINGH (IND)": "NAGINDER SINGH (IND)", "HARPREET SINGH (SAD)": "HARPREET SINGH (SAD)", "NATHU RAM (INC)": "NATHU RAM (INC)", "GURCHARAN SINGH (BSP)": "GURCHARAN SINGH (BSP)", "SUKHCHAIN SINGH (NCP)": "SUKHCHAIN SINGH (NCP)", "JAGDEV SINGH (IND)": "JAGDEV SINGH (IND)", "DHAKKER SINGH (IND)": "DHAKKER SINGH (IND)", "GURTEJ SINGH (IND)": "GURTEJ SINGH (IND)", "SIKANDER KUMAR (IND)": "SIKANDER KUMAR (IND)", "SUNDER LAL (IND)": "SUNDER LAL (IND)", "PARKASH SINGH BADAL (SAD)": "PARKASH SINGH BADAL (SAD)", "MAHESH INDER SINGH (INC)": "MAHESH INDER SINGH (INC)", "HARNEK SINGH (BSP)": "HARNEK SINGH (BSP)", "RAJU KUMAR (SP)": "RAJU KUMAR (SP)", "BALWINDER SINGH COMRADE (IND)": "BALWINDER SINGH COMRADE (IND)", "ATINDERPAL SINGH KHALSA (IND)": "ATINDERPAL SINGH KHALSA (IND)", "SURINDERPAL SINGH (IND)": "SURINDERPAL SINGH (IND)", "SAWARAN SINGH RAMGARIA (IND)": "SAWARAN SINGH RAMGARIA (IND)", "JEETMOHINDER SINGH SIDHU (INC)": "JEETMOHINDER SINGH SIDHU (INC)", "AMARJIT SINGH SIDHU (SAD)": "AMARJIT SINGH SIDHU (SAD)", "VIJAY MITTAL (IND)": "VIJAY MITTAL (IND)", "BHIM CHAND (IND)": "BHIM CHAND (IND)", "BALVEER SINGH (IND)": "BALVEER SINGH (IND)", "HARDEVINDER SINGH CHAHAL (IND)": "HARDEVINDER SINGH CHAHAL (IND)", "GURNAIB SINGH (IND)": "GURNAIB SINGH (IND)", "MAKHAN SINGH (INC)": "MAKHAN SINGH (INC)", "DARSHAN SINGH KOTFATTA (SAD)": "DARSHAN SINGH KOTFATTA (SAD)", "KIRANJIT SINGH (LJP)": "KIRANJIT SINGH (LJP)", "MEENA RANI (BSP)": "MEENA RANI (BSP)", "BARU SINGH (IND)": "BARU SINGH (IND)", "SURJIT SINGH (CPI)": "SURJIT SINGH (CPI)", "HARMINDER SINGH JASSI (INC)": "HARMINDER SINGH JASSI (INC)", "SARUP CHAND SINGLA (SAD)": "SARUP CHAND SINGLA (SAD)", "ER RAJBIR SINGH SIDHU (IND)": "ER RAJBIR SINGH SIDHU (IND)", "JAGJIT SINGH JOGA (CPI)": "JAGJIT SINGH JOGA (CPI)", "PAWAN KUMAR (BSP)": "PAWAN KUMAR (BSP)", "MAJOR SINGH BAWRA (IND)": "MAJOR SINGH BAWRA (IND)", "BHUPINDER BANSAL (IND)": "BHUPINDER BANSAL (IND)", "JAGJIT SINGH (IND)": "JAGJIT SINGH (IND)", "BABU LAL ARORA (IND)": "BABU LAL ARORA (IND)", "DEEPAK (IND)": "DEEPAK (IND)", "BHUPINDER KUMAR (IND)": "BHUPINDER KUMAR (IND)", "HARMAIL SINGH (IND)": "HARMAIL SINGH (IND)", "JAGRAJ SINGH (IND)": "JAGRAJ SINGH (IND)", "AJAIB SINGH BHATTI (INC)": "AJAIB SINGH BHATTI (INC)", "GURA SINGH TUNGWALI (SAD)": "GURA SINGH TUNGWALI (SAD)", "MAHINDER SINGH (BSP)": "MAHINDER SINGH (BSP)", "RAM KISHAN (IND)": "RAM KISHAN (IND)", "SURJAN SINGH JOGA (NCP)": "SURJAN SINGH JOGA (NCP)", "CHINDA SINGH (IND)": "CHINDA SINGH (IND)", "HARVINDER SINGH (CPI(ML)(L))": "HARVINDER SINGH (CPI(ML)(L))", "BUTA RAM (IND)": "BUTA RAM (IND)", "SHAM LAL BISHNANDI (IND)": "SHAM LAL BISHNANDI (IND)", "GURPREET SINGH KANGAR (INC)": "GURPREET SINGH KANGAR (INC)", "SIKANDER SINGH MALUKA (SAD)": "SIKANDER SINGH MALUKA (SAD)", "AMRIK SINGH (CPI)": "AMRIK SINGH (CPI)", "BHARPUR SINGH (BSP)": "BHARPUR SINGH (BSP)", "JAGSIR SINGH (IND)": "JAGSIR SINGH (IND)", "JASVIR KAUR (IND)": "JASVIR KAUR (IND)", "GURDITTA SINGH (IND)": "GURDITTA SINGH (IND)", "RAJINDER SINGH (DBSP)": "RAJINDER SINGH (DBSP)", "SIKANDER SINGH S/O RAM CHAND (IND)": "SIKANDER SINGH S/O RAM CHAND (IND)", "SIKANDER SINGH S/O SUKHDEV SINGH (IND)": "SIKANDER SINGH S/O SUKHDEV SINGH (IND)", "JAGDEEP SINGH NAKAI (SAD)": "JAGDEEP SINGH NAKAI (SAD)", "SUKHRAJ SINGH NATT (IND)": "SUKHRAJ SINGH NATT (IND)", "NARINDER SINGH (INC)": "NARINDER SINGH (INC)", "HARCHARN SINGH (SAD(M))": "HARCHARN SINGH (SAD(M))", "SURJIT SINGH (NCP)": "SURJIT SINGH (NCP)", "GURJANT SINGH (CPI(ML)(L))": "GURJANT SINGH (CPI(ML)(L))", "MALKIAT SINGH (LJP)": "MALKIAT SINGH (LJP)", "SHER SINGH (INC)": "SHER SINGH (INC)", "SUKHWINDER SINGH (SAD)": "SUKHWINDER SINGH (SAD)", "MANJIT SINGH JHALBUTI (IND)": "MANJIT SINGH JHALBUTI (IND)", "JAGPAL SINGH (IND)": "JAGPAL SINGH (IND)", "RAJWINDER SINGH (CPI(ML)(L))": "RAJWINDER SINGH (CPI(ML)(L))", "GURDEV SINGH (BSP)": "GURDEV SINGH (BSP)", "DALJIT SINGH (CPI)": "DALJIT SINGH (CPI)", "SHIVCHARAN DASS (IND)": "SHIVCHARAN DASS (IND)", "PARKASH CHAND JINDAL (IND)": "PARKASH CHAND JINDAL (IND)", "RAM CHAND (ABJP)": "RAM CHAND (ABJP)", "MANGAT RAI BANSAL (INC)": "MANGAT RAI BANSAL (INC)", "HARBANT SINGH (SAD)": "HARBANT SINGH (SAD)", "HARDEV SINGH ARSHI (CPI)": "HARDEV SINGH ARSHI (CPI)", "KARAM SINGH (BSP)": "KARAM SINGH (BSP)", "BHAGWANT SINGH (CPI(ML)(L))": "BHAGWANT SINGH (CPI(ML)(L))", "JASBIR KAUR (IND)": "JASBIR KAUR (IND)", "KARAM CHAND (IND)": "KARAM CHAND (IND)", "AJIT INDER SINGH (INC)": "AJIT INDER SINGH (INC)", "BALWINDER SINGH (SAD)": "BALWINDER SINGH (SAD)", "SATPAL SINGH (CPI(ML)(L))": "SATPAL SINGH (CPI(ML)(L))", "VEENA RANI (SP)": "VEENA RANI (SP)", "VINAY PRATAP SINGH (IND)": "VINAY PRATAP SINGH (IND)", "TEK SINGH (IND)": "TEK SINGH (IND)", "PREM KUMAR (IND)": "PREM KUMAR (IND)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 116, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 116, "cast_gt_registered": 116}, "n_stations_flagged": 116, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:32:11.753198", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.768, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.854, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.721, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.569, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.111, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 116}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "32eeb3d935cd459c87d3ffad93da3318", "name": "India 2008 assembly (state legislative assembly) (overnight india_chhattisgarh_2008_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ABHM": "ABHM", "ABMAD": "ABMAD", "ABSSP": "ABSSP", "AD": "AD", "APP": "APP", "BBP": "BBP", "BHBP": "BHBP", "BJP": "BJP", "BJSH": "BJSH", "BPSGKD": "BPSGKD", "BSP": "BSP", "BSSP": "BSSP", "CGVP": "CGVP", "CMM": "CMM", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "CPM": "CPM", "CSP": "CSP", "CVKP": "CVKP", "GGP": "GGP", "GMS": "GMS", "INC": "INC", "JCGP": "JCGP", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "JMM": "JMM", "KKJHS": "KKJHS", "LJP": "LJP", "LSWP": "LSWP", "NCP": "NCP", "PBRP": "PBRP", "RGOP": "RGOP", "RJD": "RJD", "RP(K)": "RP(K)", "RPI": "RPI", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "RPI(KM)": "RPI(KM)", "SHS": "SHS", "SJP(R)": "SJP(R)", "SP": "SP", "SUSP": "SUSP", "IND_1": "IND_1", "IND_2": "IND_2", "IND_3": "IND_3", "IND_4": "IND_4", "IND_5": "IND_5", "IND_6": "IND_6", "IND_7": "IND_7", "IND_8": "IND_8", "IND_9": "IND_9", "IND_10": "IND_10", "IND_11": "IND_11", "IND_12": "IND_12", "IND_13": "IND_13", "IND_14": "IND_14", "IND_15": "IND_15", "IND_16": "IND_16", "IND_17": "IND_17", "IND_18": "IND_18"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 90, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 90, "registered_not_positive": 90}, "n_stations_flagged": 90, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:32:04.109005", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.768, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.854, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.721, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.569, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.111, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 90}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5f773ccf60df40bea488d51672b831be", "name": "India 2008 local (overnight india_jammu_kashmir_2008_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2008, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AIFB": "AIFB", "AJKMP": "AJKMP", "ANC": "ANC", "APP": "APP", "BCDP": "BCDP", "BCP": "BCP", "BHBP": "BHBP", "BJP": "BJP", "BSKRP": "BSKRP", "BSP": "BSP", "CPI": "CPI", "CPM": "CPM", "DGPP": "DGPP", "INC": "INC", "IND_001_1": "IND_001_1", "IND_001_2": "IND_001_2", "IND_001_3": "IND_001_3", "IND_001_4": "IND_001_4", "IND_001_5": "IND_001_5", "IND_002_1": "IND_002_1", "IND_002_2": "IND_002_2", "IND_002_3": "IND_002_3", "IND_002_4": "IND_002_4", "IND_002_5": "IND_002_5", "IND_002_6": "IND_002_6", "IND_003_1": "IND_003_1", "IND_003_2": "IND_003_2", "IND_003_3": "IND_003_3", "IND_003_4": "IND_003_4", "IND_004_1": "IND_004_1", "IND_004_2": "IND_004_2", "IND_004_3": "IND_004_3", "IND_004_4": "IND_004_4", "IND_004_5": "IND_004_5", "IND_004_6": "IND_004_6", "IND_004_7": "IND_004_7", "IND_005_1": "IND_005_1", "IND_005_2": "IND_005_2", "IND_005_3": "IND_005_3", "IND_005_4": "IND_005_4", "IND_005_5": "IND_005_5", "IND_005_6": "IND_005_6", "IND_005_7": "IND_005_7", "IND_005_8": "IND_005_8", "IND_006_1": "IND_006_1", "IND_006_2": "IND_006_2", "IND_006_3": "IND_006_3", "IND_006_4": "IND_006_4", "IND_007_1": "IND_007_1", "IND_007_2": "IND_007_2", "IND_008_1": "IND_008_1", "IND_008_10": "IND_008_10", "IND_008_11": "IND_008_11", "IND_008_12": "IND_008_12", "IND_008_13": "IND_008_13", "IND_008_2": "IND_008_2", "IND_008_3": "IND_008_3", "IND_008_4": "IND_008_4", "IND_008_5": "IND_008_5", "IND_008_6": "IND_008_6", "IND_008_7": "IND_008_7", "IND_008_8": "IND_008_8", "IND_008_9": "IND_008_9", "IND_010_1": "IND_010_1", "IND_010_2": "IND_010_2", "IND_010_3": "IND_010_3", "IND_010_4": "IND_010_4", "IND_010_5": "IND_010_5", "IND_010_6": "IND_010_6", "IND_010_7": "IND_010_7", "IND_011_1": "IND_011_1", "IND_011_10": "IND_011_10", "IND_011_2": "IND_011_2", "IND_011_3": "IND_011_3", "IND_011_4": "IND_011_4", "IND_011_5": "IND_011_5", "IND_011_6": "IND_011_6", "IND_011_7": "IND_011_7", "IND_011_8": "IND_011_8", "IND_011_9": "IND_011_9", "IND_012_1": "IND_012_1", "IND_012_2": "IND_012_2", "IND_012_3": "IND_012_3", "IND_012_4": "IND_012_4", "IND_012_5": "IND_012_5", "IND_012_6": "IND_012_6", "IND_012_7": "IND_012_7", "IND_012_8": "IND_012_8", "IND_013_1": "IND_013_1", "IND_013_2": "IND_013_2", "IND_013_3": "IND_013_3", "IND_014_1": "IND_014_1", "IND_014_2": "IND_014_2", "IND_014_3": "IND_014_3", "IND_015_1": "IND_015_1", "IND_015_2": "IND_015_2", "IND_015_3": "IND_015_3", "IND_015_4": "IND_015_4", "IND_016_1": "IND_016_1", "IND_016_2": "IND_016_2", "IND_017_1": "IND_017_1", "IND_017_2": "IND_017_2", "IND_018_1": "IND_018_1", "IND_018_2": "IND_018_2", "IND_018_3": "IND_018_3", "IND_018_4": "IND_018_4", "IND_018_5": "IND_018_5", "IND_018_6": "IND_018_6", "IND_019_1": "IND_019_1", "IND_019_2": "IND_019_2", "IND_019_3": "IND_019_3", "IND_019_4": "IND_019_4", "IND_019_5": "IND_019_5", "IND_019_6": "IND_019_6", "IND_019_7": "IND_019_7", "IND_020_1": "IND_020_1", "IND_020_2": "IND_020_2", "IND_020_3": "IND_020_3", "IND_020_4": "IND_020_4", "IND_020_5": "IND_020_5", "IND_020_6": "IND_020_6", "IND_020_7": "IND_020_7", "IND_021_1": "IND_021_1", "IND_021_2": "IND_021_2", "IND_022_1": "IND_022_1", "IND_022_2": "IND_022_2", "IND_022_3": "IND_022_3", "IND_022_4": "IND_022_4", "IND_022_5": "IND_022_5", "IND_022_6": "IND_022_6", "IND_022_7": "IND_022_7", "IND_022_8": "IND_022_8", "IND_022_9": "IND_022_9", "IND_023_1": "IND_023_1", "IND_023_10": "IND_023_10", "IND_023_11": "IND_023_11", "IND_023_12": "IND_023_12", "IND_023_13": "IND_023_13", "IND_023_14": "IND_023_14", "IND_023_15": "IND_023_15", "IND_023_16": "IND_023_16", "IND_023_2": "IND_023_2", "IND_023_3": "IND_023_3", "IND_023_4": "IND_023_4", "IND_023_5": "IND_023_5", "IND_023_6": "IND_023_6", "IND_023_7": "IND_023_7", "IND_023_8": "IND_023_8", "IND_023_9": "IND_023_9", "IND_024_1": "IND_024_1", "IND_024_2": "IND_024_2", "IND_024_3": "IND_024_3", "IND_024_4": "IND_024_4", "IND_024_5": "IND_024_5", "IND_024_6": "IND_024_6", "IND_024_7": "IND_024_7", "IND_024_8": "IND_024_8", "IND_025_1": "IND_025_1", "IND_025_2": "IND_025_2", "IND_025_3": "IND_025_3", "IND_025_4": "IND_025_4", "IND_026_1": "IND_026_1", "IND_026_2": "IND_026_2", "IND_026_3": "IND_026_3", "IND_026_4": "IND_026_4", "IND_027_1": "IND_027_1", "IND_027_2": "IND_027_2", "IND_027_3": "IND_027_3", "IND_027_4": "IND_027_4", "IND_027_5": "IND_027_5", "IND_027_6": "IND_027_6", "IND_027_7": "IND_027_7", "IND_028_1": "IND_028_1", "IND_028_2": "IND_028_2", "IND_028_3": "IND_028_3", "IND_028_4": "IND_028_4", "IND_028_5": "IND_028_5", "IND_028_6": "IND_028_6", "IND_028_7": "IND_028_7", "IND_029_1": "IND_029_1", "IND_029_2": "IND_029_2", "IND_030_1": "IND_030_1", "IND_031_1": "IND_031_1", "IND_031_2": "IND_031_2", "IND_031_3": "IND_031_3", "IND_031_4": "IND_031_4", "IND_031_5": "IND_031_5", "IND_031_6": "IND_031_6", "IND_031_7": "IND_031_7", "IND_031_8": "IND_031_8", "IND_032_1": "IND_032_1", "IND_032_2": "IND_032_2", "IND_032_3": "IND_032_3", "IND_032_4": "IND_032_4", "IND_032_5": "IND_032_5", "IND_032_6": "IND_032_6", "IND_033_1": "IND_033_1", "IND_033_2": "IND_033_2", "IND_033_3": "IND_033_3", "IND_033_4": "IND_033_4", "IND_033_5": "IND_033_5", "IND_033_6": "IND_033_6", "IND_033_7": "IND_033_7", "IND_034_1": "IND_034_1", "IND_034_2": "IND_034_2", "IND_034_3": "IND_034_3", "IND_034_4": "IND_034_4", "IND_035_1": "IND_035_1", "IND_035_2": "IND_035_2", "IND_035_3": "IND_035_3", "IND_036_1": "IND_036_1", "IND_036_2": "IND_036_2", "IND_036_3": "IND_036_3", "IND_036_4": "IND_036_4", "IND_036_5": "IND_036_5", "IND_036_6": "IND_036_6", "IND_037_1": "IND_037_1", "IND_037_2": "IND_037_2", "IND_037_3": "IND_037_3", "IND_037_4": "IND_037_4", "IND_037_5": "IND_037_5", "IND_037_6": "IND_037_6", "IND_038_1": "IND_038_1", "IND_038_10": "IND_038_10", "IND_038_2": "IND_038_2", "IND_038_3": "IND_038_3", "IND_038_4": "IND_038_4", "IND_038_5": "IND_038_5", "IND_038_6": "IND_038_6", "IND_038_7": "IND_038_7", "IND_038_8": "IND_038_8", "IND_038_9": "IND_038_9", "IND_039_1": "IND_039_1", "IND_039_2": "IND_039_2", "IND_039_3": "IND_039_3", "IND_039_4": "IND_039_4", "IND_039_5": "IND_039_5", "IND_039_6": "IND_039_6", "IND_040_1": "IND_040_1", "IND_040_2": "IND_040_2", "IND_040_3": "IND_040_3", "IND_040_4": "IND_040_4", "IND_040_5": "IND_040_5", "IND_040_6": "IND_040_6", "IND_040_7": "IND_040_7", "IND_040_8": "IND_040_8", "IND_041_1": "IND_041_1", "IND_041_2": "IND_041_2", "IND_041_3": "IND_041_3", "IND_041_4": "IND_041_4", "IND_041_5": "IND_041_5", "IND_041_6": "IND_041_6", "IND_042_1": "IND_042_1", "IND_042_2": "IND_042_2", "IND_042_3": "IND_042_3", "IND_042_4": "IND_042_4", "IND_043_1": "IND_043_1", "IND_043_2": "IND_043_2", "IND_043_3": "IND_043_3", "IND_043_4": "IND_043_4", "IND_043_5": "IND_043_5", "IND_043_6": "IND_043_6", "IND_043_7": "IND_043_7", "IND_044_1": "IND_044_1", "IND_044_2": "IND_044_2", "IND_044_3": "IND_044_3", "IND_044_4": "IND_044_4", "IND_044_5": "IND_044_5", "IND_044_6": "IND_044_6", "IND_045_1": "IND_045_1", "IND_045_2": "IND_045_2", "IND_045_3": "IND_045_3", "IND_046_1": "IND_046_1", "IND_046_2": "IND_046_2", "IND_046_3": "IND_046_3", "IND_047_1": "IND_047_1", "IND_047_2": "IND_047_2", "IND_047_3": "IND_047_3", "IND_048_1": "IND_048_1", "IND_049_1": "IND_049_1", "IND_050_1": "IND_050_1", "IND_051_1": "IND_051_1", "IND_051_2": "IND_051_2", "IND_051_3": "IND_051_3", "IND_051_4": "IND_051_4", "IND_051_5": "IND_051_5", "IND_051_6": "IND_051_6", "IND_052_1": "IND_052_1", "IND_052_2": "IND_052_2", "IND_052_3": "IND_052_3", "IND_052_4": "IND_052_4", "IND_052_5": "IND_052_5", "IND_052_6": "IND_052_6", "IND_052_7": "IND_052_7", "IND_053_1": "IND_053_1", "IND_053_2": "IND_053_2", "IND_053_3": "IND_053_3", "IND_053_4": "IND_053_4", "IND_053_5": "IND_053_5", "IND_053_6": "IND_053_6", "IND_053_7": "IND_053_7", "IND_053_8": "IND_053_8", "IND_054_1": "IND_054_1", "IND_054_2": "IND_054_2", "IND_055_1": "IND_055_1", "IND_055_2": "IND_055_2", "IND_056_1": "IND_056_1", "IND_056_10": "IND_056_10", "IND_056_2": "IND_056_2", "IND_056_3": "IND_056_3", "IND_056_4": "IND_056_4", "IND_056_5": "IND_056_5", "IND_056_6": "IND_056_6", "IND_056_7": "IND_056_7", "IND_056_8": "IND_056_8", "IND_056_9": "IND_056_9", "IND_057_1": "IND_057_1", "IND_057_2": "IND_057_2", "IND_057_3": "IND_057_3", "IND_057_4": "IND_057_4", "IND_058_1": "IND_058_1", "IND_058_2": "IND_058_2", "IND_058_3": "IND_058_3", "IND_058_4": "IND_058_4", "IND_058_5": "IND_058_5", "IND_058_6": "IND_058_6", "IND_058_7": "IND_058_7", "IND_058_8": "IND_058_8", "IND_058_9": "IND_058_9", "IND_059_1": "IND_059_1", "IND_060_1": "IND_060_1", "IND_060_2": "IND_060_2", "IND_060_3": "IND_060_3", "IND_060_4": "IND_060_4", "IND_060_5": "IND_060_5", "IND_060_6": "IND_060_6", "IND_060_7": "IND_060_7", "IND_061_1": "IND_061_1", "IND_061_2": "IND_061_2", "IND_061_3": "IND_061_3", "IND_061_4": "IND_061_4", "IND_062_1": "IND_062_1", "IND_062_2": "IND_062_2", "IND_062_3": "IND_062_3", "IND_063_1": "IND_063_1", "IND_063_2": "IND_063_2", "IND_063_3": "IND_063_3", "IND_064_1": "IND_064_1", "IND_064_2": "IND_064_2", "IND_065_1": "IND_065_1", "IND_065_2": "IND_065_2", "IND_065_3": "IND_065_3", "IND_065_4": "IND_065_4", "IND_065_5": "IND_065_5", "IND_065_6": "IND_065_6", "IND_065_7": "IND_065_7", "IND_065_8": "IND_065_8", "IND_065_9": "IND_065_9", "IND_066_1": "IND_066_1", "IND_066_2": "IND_066_2", "IND_066_3": "IND_066_3", "IND_066_4": "IND_066_4", "IND_066_5": "IND_066_5", "IND_066_6": "IND_066_6", "IND_067_1": "IND_067_1", "IND_067_2": "IND_067_2", "IND_067_3": "IND_067_3", "IND_067_4": "IND_067_4", "IND_067_5": "IND_067_5", "IND_067_6": "IND_067_6", "IND_068_1": "IND_068_1", "IND_068_2": "IND_068_2", "IND_068_3": "IND_068_3", "IND_069_1": "IND_069_1", "IND_069_2": "IND_069_2", "IND_069_3": "IND_069_3", "IND_069_4": "IND_069_4", "IND_069_5": "IND_069_5", "IND_069_6": "IND_069_6", "IND_069_7": "IND_069_7", "IND_070_1": "IND_070_1", "IND_070_2": "IND_070_2", "IND_070_3": "IND_070_3", "IND_070_4": "IND_070_4", "IND_070_5": "IND_070_5", "IND_070_6": "IND_070_6", "IND_070_7": "IND_070_7", "IND_070_8": "IND_070_8", "IND_071_1": "IND_071_1", "IND_071_2": "IND_071_2", "IND_071_3": "IND_071_3", "IND_071_4": "IND_071_4", "IND_071_5": "IND_071_5", "IND_072_1": "IND_072_1", "IND_072_2": "IND_072_2", "IND_072_3": "IND_072_3", "IND_072_4": "IND_072_4", "IND_072_5": "IND_072_5", "IND_072_6": "IND_072_6", "IND_072_7": "IND_072_7", "IND_073_1": "IND_073_1", "IND_073_10": "IND_073_10", "IND_073_11": "IND_073_11", "IND_073_12": "IND_073_12", "IND_073_13": "IND_073_13", "IND_073_14": "IND_073_14", "IND_073_15": "IND_073_15", "IND_073_16": "IND_073_16", "IND_073_17": "IND_073_17", "IND_073_18": "IND_073_18", "IND_073_19": "IND_073_19", "IND_073_2": "IND_073_2", "IND_073_3": "IND_073_3", "IND_073_4": "IND_073_4", "IND_073_5": "IND_073_5", "IND_073_6": "IND_073_6", "IND_073_7": "IND_073_7", "IND_073_8": "IND_073_8", "IND_073_9": "IND_073_9", "IND_074_1": "IND_074_1", "IND_074_10": "IND_074_10", "IND_074_11": "IND_074_11", "IND_074_12": "IND_074_12", "IND_074_13": "IND_074_13", "IND_074_14": "IND_074_14", "IND_074_15": "IND_074_15", "IND_074_2": "IND_074_2", "IND_074_3": "IND_074_3", "IND_074_4": "IND_074_4", "IND_074_5": "IND_074_5", "IND_074_6": "IND_074_6", "IND_074_7": "IND_074_7", "IND_074_8": "IND_074_8", "IND_074_9": "IND_074_9", "IND_075_1": "IND_075_1", "IND_075_2": "IND_075_2", "IND_076_1": "IND_076_1", "IND_076_2": "IND_076_2", "IND_076_3": "IND_076_3", "IND_076_4": "IND_076_4", "IND_076_5": "IND_076_5", "IND_076_6": "IND_076_6", "IND_077_1": "IND_077_1", "IND_077_2": "IND_077_2", "IND_077_3": "IND_077_3", "IND_078_1": "IND_078_1", "IND_079_1": "IND_079_1", "IND_079_10": "IND_079_10", "IND_079_11": "IND_079_11", "IND_079_12": "IND_079_12", "IND_079_13": "IND_079_13", "IND_079_14": "IND_079_14", "IND_079_2": "IND_079_2", "IND_079_3": "IND_079_3", "IND_079_4": "IND_079_4", "IND_079_5": "IND_079_5", "IND_079_6": "IND_079_6", "IND_079_7": "IND_079_7", "IND_079_8": "IND_079_8", "IND_079_9": "IND_079_9", "IND_080_1": "IND_080_1", "IND_080_2": "IND_080_2", "IND_081_1": "IND_081_1", "IND_081_2": "IND_081_2", "IND_081_3": "IND_081_3", "IND_082_1": "IND_082_1", "IND_082_2": "IND_082_2", "IND_082_3": "IND_082_3", "IND_082_4": "IND_082_4", "IND_083_1": "IND_083_1", "IND_083_10": "IND_083_10", "IND_083_11": "IND_083_11", "IND_083_12": "IND_083_12", "IND_083_13": "IND_083_13", "IND_083_2": "IND_083_2", "IND_083_3": "IND_083_3", "IND_083_4": "IND_083_4", "IND_083_5": "IND_083_5", "IND_083_6": "IND_083_6", "IND_083_7": "IND_083_7", "IND_083_8": "IND_083_8", "IND_083_9": "IND_083_9", "IND_084_1": "IND_084_1", "IND_084_2": "IND_084_2", "IND_084_3": "IND_084_3", "IND_084_4": "IND_084_4", "IND_084_5": "IND_084_5", "IND_084_6": "IND_084_6", "IND_085_1": "IND_085_1", "IND_085_2": "IND_085_2", "IND_086_1": "IND_086_1", "IND_087_1": "IND_087_1", "IND_087_2": "IND_087_2", "IND_087_3": "IND_087_3", "IND_087_4": "IND_087_4", "JD(S)": "JD(S)", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "JKAL": "JKAL", "JKANC": "JKANC", "JKDPN": "JKDPN", "JKN": "JKN", "JKNPP": "JKNPP", "JKNUF": "JKNUF", "JKPDF": "JKPDF", "JKPDP": "JKPDP", "JP": "JP", "JSM(P)": "JSM(P)", "KRD": "KRD", "LJP": "LJP", "NCP": "NCP", "NDP": "NDP", "NLHP": "NLHP", "PDF": "PDF", "RJD": "RJD", "RKSP": "RKSP", "RLD": "RLD", "RNSP": "RNSP", "RPI": "RPI", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "RSP": "RSP", "SAP": "SAP", "SDP": "SDP", "SP": "SP", "UCP": "UCP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 87, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 87, "registered_not_positive": 87}, "n_stations_flagged": 87, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:32:02.308462", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.768, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.854, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.721, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.569, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.111, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 87}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3d5119ec9c19495992827233dcec7c28", "name": "India 2008 assembly (overnight india-delhi-2008-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"JASWANT SINGH (INC)": "JASWANT SINGH (INC)", "SHARAD KUMAR (BSP)": "SHARAD KUMAR (BSP)", "AJIT SINGH (BJP)": "AJIT SINGH (BJP)", "RAJ SINGH KHATRI (IND)": "RAJ SINGH KHATRI (IND)", "AMIT KUMAR (LJP)": "AMIT KUMAR (LJP)", "KULDEEP (RJD)": "KULDEEP (RJD)", "RISHA (IND)": "RISHA (IND)", "SHYAM LAL (CPI(ML)(L))": "SHYAM LAL (CPI(ML)(L))", "HARIOM SHARMA (SP)": "HARIOM SHARMA (SP)", "VISHAL (RWS)": "VISHAL (RWS)", "ANIL KUMAR (IND)": "ANIL KUMAR (IND)", "RAGHBIR SINGH (IND)": "RAGHBIR SINGH (IND)", "SHRI KRISHAN (BJP)": "SHRI KRISHAN (BJP)", "DEEPAK TYAGI (INC)": "DEEPAK TYAGI (INC)", "VINOD NAGAR (LJP)": "VINOD NAGAR (LJP)", "ANAND OHAN JOSHI (BSP)": "ANAND OHAN JOSHI (BSP)", "RAM KISHORE TYAGI (NCP)": "RAM KISHORE TYAGI (NCP)", "MANOJ KUMAR (RJD)": "MANOJ KUMAR (RJD)", "INDER SINGH (JD(U))": "INDER SINGH (JD(U))", "SANDEEP KUMAR (IND)": "SANDEEP KUMAR (IND)", "DHARMENDER SINGHAL (IND)": "DHARMENDER SINGHAL (IND)", "GANESH PAL (BSKP)": "GANESH PAL (BSKP)", "UNNA RAWAT (IJP)": "UNNA RAWAT (IJP)", "KAMLA RANI (IND)": "KAMLA RANI (IND)", "SADHNA SHARMA (IND)": "SADHNA SHARMA (IND)", "BHAGWAN SINGH (RWS)": "BHAGWAN SINGH (RWS)", "RAGINI SHARMA (IND)": "RAGINI SHARMA (IND)", "DEEN DAYAL SINGH (ABHM)": "DEEN DAYAL SINGH (ABHM)", "LAL BAHADUR SINGH (RMEP)": "LAL BAHADUR SINGH (RMEP)", "BABLI (SHS)": "BABLI (SHS)", "HARI KISHAN (NLHP)": "HARI KISHAN (NLHP)", "JAI RAM AURYA (IND)": "JAI RAM AURYA (IND)", "NAFE SINGH (IND)": "NAFE SINGH (IND)", "SURAJ PAL SINGH (SP)": "SURAJ PAL SINGH (SP)", "SHIVJI SHAH (IND)": "SHIVJI SHAH (IND)", "RAKESH KUMAR (IND)": "RAKESH KUMAR (IND)", "SURINDER PAL SINGH (INC)": "SURINDER PAL SINGH (INC)", "SURYA PRAKASH KHATRI (BJP)": "SURYA PRAKASH KHATRI (BJP)", "SANJEEV KUMAR (BSP)": "SANJEEV KUMAR (BSP)", "APRAMAY ISHRA (SP)": "APRAMAY ISHRA (SP)", "SHYAM GOPAL (ABHM)": "SHYAM GOPAL (ABHM)", "MOHD KAMIL (IND)": "MOHD KAMIL (IND)", "RAJU GUPTA (IND)": "RAJU GUPTA (IND)", "RANJIT SINGH (IND)": "RANJIT SINGH (IND)", "MAHFOOZ ALI (NCP)": "MAHFOOZ ALI (NCP)", "RAJESH KUMAR (IND)": "RAJESH KUMAR (IND)", "OHD RAZIUR REHMAN (LJP)": "OHD RAZIUR REHMAN (LJP)", "RAJESH SINGH (IND)": "RAJESH SINGH (IND)", "KRIPAL SINGH BITTOO (IND)": "KRIPAL SINGH BITTOO (IND)", "OOHD YAMEEN (IND)": "OOHD YAMEEN (IND)", "DROPTI (RVNP)": "DROPTI (RVNP)", "AJAY SINGH (IND)": "AJAY SINGH (IND)", "MANGAT RAM (INC)": "MANGAT RAM (INC)", "RAVINDER SINGH (KHURANA) (BJP)": "RAVINDER SINGH (KHURANA) (BJP)", "SANJAY NAGPAL (BSP)": "SANJAY NAGPAL (BSP)", "SUDHIR PATHAK (IND)": "SUDHIR PATHAK (IND)", "RAM SARAN RAM (CPI)": "RAM SARAN RAM (CPI)", "VIJAY SINGH SISODIA (LJP)": "VIJAY SINGH SISODIA (LJP)", "SHEKH ZAHID (IND)": "SHEKH ZAHID (IND)", "LAL SINGH (IND)": "LAL SINGH (IND)", "VINOD KUMAR (IND)": "VINOD KUMAR (IND)", "AJAY KUMAR (IND)": "AJAY KUMAR (IND)", "VIJENDER KUMAR (IND)": "VIJENDER KUMAR (IND)", "RAJEEV (IND)": "RAJEEV (IND)", "SUNIL KUMAR GUPTA (MBP)": "SUNIL KUMAR GUPTA (MBP)", "DEVENDER YADAV (INC)": "DEVENDER YADAV (INC)", "AJESH YADAV (BSP)": "AJESH YADAV (BSP)", "RAJESH YADAV (BJP)": "RAJESH YADAV (BJP)", "JITENDER KUMAR (NCP)": "JITENDER KUMAR (NCP)", "PARWINDER SINGH (RJD)": "PARWINDER SINGH (RJD)", "SUNDER SINGH (IND)": "SUNDER SINGH (IND)", "PARAS YADAV (IND)": "PARAS YADAV (IND)", "SURESH TOMAR (SP)": "SURESH TOMAR (SP)", "KAPIL DEV SINGH (LD)": "KAPIL DEV SINGH (LD)", "SAT PAL (IND)": "SAT PAL (IND)", "DEVENDER YADAV (IND)": "DEVENDER YADAV (IND)", "PANKAJ SHARMA (IND)": "PANKAJ SHARMA (IND)", "ZAHID HUSSAIN (IND)": "ZAHID HUSSAIN (IND)", "SUSHIL KUMAR KASHYAP (MKUP)": "SUSHIL KUMAR KASHYAP (MKUP)", "KULWANT RANA (BJP)": "KULWANT RANA (BJP)", "SHAMBHU DAYAL SHARMA (INC)": "SHAMBHU DAYAL SHARMA (INC)", "RANBIR SINGH SAROHA (BSP)": "RANBIR SINGH SAROHA (BSP)", "VIDYA PATTI (IND)": "VIDYA PATTI (IND)", "RAJESH KUMAR (LJP)": "RAJESH KUMAR (LJP)", "OM PRAKASH (ABHM)": "OM PRAKASH (ABHM)", "NARENDER PAL KASHYAP (IND)": "NARENDER PAL KASHYAP (IND)", "DHARAMBIR (IND)": "DHARAMBIR (IND)", "BHARAT NATH (JD(U))": "BHARAT NATH (JD(U))", "KAMLESH GOSWAMI (IND)": "KAMLESH GOSWAMI (IND)", "ASHOK ATTA (IND)": "ASHOK ATTA (IND)", "ABDUL RAHIM SAIFI (IND)": "ABDUL RAHIM SAIFI (IND)", "RAJHANS BANSAL (IJP)": "RAJHANS BANSAL (IJP)", "SURENDER KUMAR (INC)": "SURENDER KUMAR (INC)", "CHAND RAM (BJP)": "CHAND RAM (BJP)", "RAMCHANDER (BSP)": "RAMCHANDER (BSP)", "PHOOL KUMAR (LJP)": "PHOOL KUMAR (LJP)", "HARBIR SINGH (IND)": "HARBIR SINGH (IND)", "REKHA DEVI (BPC)": "REKHA DEVI (BPC)", "MANOJ KUMAR (BJP)": "MANOJ KUMAR (BJP)", "PREM CHANDER KAUSHIK (INC)": "PREM CHANDER KAUSHIK (INC)", "JASBIR (BSP)": "JASBIR (BSP)", "CHANDI RAM (NCP)": "CHANDI RAM (NCP)", "BHAGWAN SINGH (IND)": "BHAGWAN SINGH (IND)", "SHARAFAT ALI (ABSP)": "SHARAFAT ALI (ABSP)", "VIJAY KUMAR (IND)": "VIJAY KUMAR (IND)", "JAIDEEP SINGH (MKUP)": "JAIDEEP SINGH (MKUP)", "NAGENDRA SHARMA (RAM)": "NAGENDRA SHARMA (RAM)", "D. YASIN KHAN (IND)": "D. YASIN KHAN (IND)", "PREM NARAYAN (IND)": "PREM NARAYAN (IND)", "LAL CHAND (LPSP)": "LAL CHAND (LPSP)", "RAJ KUMAR PARIHAR (IND)": "RAJ KUMAR PARIHAR (IND)", "AHAVIR (AIFB)": "AHAVIR (AIFB)", "VIKRANT KAPOOR (SHS)": "VIKRANT KAPOOR (SHS)", "D. EHRAJ (UPUDF)": "D. EHRAJ (UPUDF)", "ANIL JHA (BJP)": "ANIL JHA (BJP)", "PUSHPRAJ (NCP)": "PUSHPRAJ (NCP)", "SHABNAM (INC)": "SHABNAM (INC)", "RAM PAL SINGH (BSP)": "RAM PAL SINGH (BSP)", "RAJ PAL (IND)": "RAJ PAL (IND)", "SHRIKANT SINGH YADAV (RJD)": "SHRIKANT SINGH YADAV (RJD)", "JUGBIR SINGH (IND)": "JUGBIR SINGH (IND)", "VIJAY KUMAR (LPSP)": "VIJAY KUMAR (LPSP)", "KAPTAN SINGH (RSMD)": "KAPTAN SINGH (RSMD)", "SHUBH KARAN (SP)": "SHUBH KARAN (SP)", "HOTI LAL (IND)": "HOTI LAL (IND)", "RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY (LJP)": "RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY (LJP)", "JASIM (ASP)": "JASIM (ASP)", "AHARAJ SINGH (BVP)": "AHARAJ SINGH (BVP)", "EERA GAUTAM (BSKP)": "EERA GAUTAM (BSKP)", "D RAHAMAT (UPUDF)": "D RAHAMAT (UPUDF)", "AWDESH SINGH (AIFB)": "AWDESH SINGH (AIFB)", "NAUSHAD ANSARI (RVNP)": "NAUSHAD ANSARI (RVNP)", "SUJAT HUSSAIN (JD(U))": "SUJAT HUSSAIN (JD(U))", "SHIVA KANT (IND)": "SHIVA KANT (IND)", "SHARWAN SINGH (JKNPP)": "SHARWAN SINGH (JKNPP)", "DHARAMVIR (UNLP)": "DHARAMVIR (UNLP)", "AHABIR SAH (RPI(A))": "AHABIR SAH (RPI(A))", "JAI KISHAN (INC)": "JAI KISHAN (INC)", "NAND RAM BAGRI (BJP)": "NAND RAM BAGRI (BJP)", "SATYA PAL SINGH (BSP)": "SATYA PAL SINGH (BSP)", "MEHAR SINGH (ABSP)": "MEHAR SINGH (ABSP)", "SONU (IND)": "SONU (IND)", "RAJESH (ASP)": "RAJESH (ASP)", "GEETA (RPI(A))": "GEETA (RPI(A))", "ZILE SINGH RANGA (SP)": "ZILE SINGH RANGA (SP)", "PAPPU SAGAR (IND)": "PAPPU SAGAR (IND)", "RAJENDER KHATIK (IJP)": "RAJENDER KHATIK (IJP)", "BIJENDER SINGH (INC)": "BIJENDER SINGH (INC)", "RAJ SINGH (BJP)": "RAJ SINGH (BJP)", "NARESH GOEL (BSP)": "NARESH GOEL (BSP)", "SUNIL KUMAR (IND)": "SUNIL KUMAR (IND)", "UDAY VEER SINGH (LJP)": "UDAY VEER SINGH (LJP)", "KULDEEP SINGH YADAV (IND)": "KULDEEP SINGH YADAV (IND)", "CHHATER PAL RATHORE (SP)": "CHHATER PAL RATHORE (SP)", "MANISH GUPTA (SHS)": "MANISH GUPTA (SHS)", "KAMAL SINGH (IND)": "KAMAL SINGH (IND)", "ANUJ (IND)": "ANUJ (IND)", "OM KRISHAN (JKNPP)": "OM KRISHAN (JKNPP)", "RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN (INC)": "RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN (INC)", "YOGESH AATRAY (BJP)": "YOGESH AATRAY (BJP)", "MUKESH KUMAR AHLAWAT (BSP)": "MUKESH KUMAR AHLAWAT (BSP)", "SANJAY BHARTI (IND)": "SANJAY BHARTI (IND)", "NAND KUMAR PASWAN (IND)": "NAND KUMAR PASWAN (IND)", "SHEESH PAL (IND)": "SHEESH PAL (IND)", "JAI BHAGWAN AGGARWAL (BJP)": "JAI BHAGWAN AGGARWAL (BJP)", "VIJENDER JINDAL (INC)": "VIJENDER JINDAL (INC)", "O.P.MALHOTRA (BSP)": "O.P.MALHOTRA (BSP)", "LABHU RAM GARG (IND)": "LABHU RAM GARG (IND)", "JHANKAR PRIYE CHATURVEDI (SHS)": "JHANKAR PRIYE CHATURVEDI (SHS)", "SANJAY SINGH (BJSH)": "SANJAY SINGH (BJSH)", "NARESH KUMAR GOYAL (IND)": "NARESH KUMAR GOYAL (IND)", "RAVINDER NATH BANSAL (BJP)": "RAVINDER NATH BANSAL (BJP)", "RAM KAILASH GUPTA (INC)": "RAM KAILASH GUPTA (INC)", "MUKESH RAJORE (BSP)": "MUKESH RAJORE (BSP)", "SAVITA (IND)": "SAVITA (IND)", "VINOD DUKHIYA (ABHM)": "VINOD DUKHIYA (ABHM)", "JAGBIR SINGH BHALLA (IND)": "JAGBIR SINGH BHALLA (IND)", "VED PRAKASH SINGHAL (RWS)": "VED PRAKASH SINGHAL (RWS)", "BASANT SAINI (IND)": "BASANT SAINI (IND)", "PANCHAM (IND)": "PANCHAM (IND)", "SHYAM LAL GARG (BJP)": "SHYAM LAL GARG (BJP)", "S. C. VATS (INC)": "S. C. VATS (INC)", "JAIDEEP DASS GUPTA (BSP)": "JAIDEEP DASS GUPTA (BSP)", "SMARTI GOEL (IND)": "SMARTI GOEL (IND)", "SANSAR CHAND (IND)": "SANSAR CHAND (IND)", "SUSHIL JAIN (IND)": "SUSHIL JAIN (IND)", "ANIL BHARDWAJ (INC)": "ANIL BHARDWAJ (INC)", "NAND KISHORE GARG (BJP)": "NAND KISHORE GARG (BJP)", "PURAN AL GOEL (BSP)": "PURAN AL GOEL (BSP)", "LALIT KUMAR SHARMA (SP)": "LALIT KUMAR SHARMA (SP)", "SUNDER SINGH KHARI (BJSH)": "SUNDER SINGH KHARI (BJSH)", "SANJAY KUMAR GAUTAM (IND)": "SANJAY KUMAR GAUTAM (IND)", "JAI BHAGWAN (IND)": "JAI BHAGWAN (IND)", "RAJ KUMAR (NCP)": "RAJ KUMAR (NCP)", "SHEELA DEVI (IND)": "SHEELA DEVI (IND)", "ANUJ KUMAR SINGH (LJP)": "ANUJ KUMAR SINGH (LJP)", "BABU LAL (IND)": "BABU LAL (IND)", "ANIL KUMAR (IND) #2": "ANIL KUMAR (IND) #2", "OM PARKASH (IND)": "OM PARKASH (IND)", "HARI SHANKER GUPTA (INC)": "HARI SHANKER GUPTA (INC)", "MANGE RAM GARG (BJP)": "MANGE RAM GARG (BJP)", "JANESH KUMAR BHADANA (BSP)": "JANESH KUMAR BHADANA (BSP)", "INDERJEET YADAV (RJD)": "INDERJEET YADAV (RJD)", "RAM AVADH (IND)": "RAM AVADH (IND)", "YOGESH (IND)": "YOGESH (IND)", "YOGINDER (IND)": "YOGINDER (IND)", "RAVI JAIN (IND)": "RAVI JAIN (IND)", "UNNA RAM (IND)": "UNNA RAM (IND)", "DHARAM PAL (IND)": "DHARAM PAL (IND)", "KANWAR KARAN SINGH (INC)": "KANWAR KARAN SINGH (INC)", "BHOLA NATH VIJ (BJP)": "BHOLA NATH VIJ (BJP)", "SOLOMON GEORGE (BSP)": "SOLOMON GEORGE (BSP)", "SAHANSAR PAL (IND)": "SAHANSAR PAL (IND)", "SATYA NARAYAIN YADAV (SP)": "SATYA NARAYAIN YADAV (SP)", "JAVED AALAM KHAN (LJP)": "JAVED AALAM KHAN (LJP)", "JAI VEER (RALP)": "JAI VEER (RALP)", "SUNIL TIWARI (MBP)": "SUNIL TIWARI (MBP)", "NOJ KAUSHIK (IND)": "NOJ KAUSHIK (IND)", "BAIJ NATH SINGH (IND)": "BAIJ NATH SINGH (IND)", "RAJESH JAIN (INC)": "RAJESH JAIN (INC)", "JAI PRAKASH (BJP)": "JAI PRAKASH (BJP)", "RAJENDRA KUMAR PRAJAPTI (BSP)": "RAJENDRA KUMAR PRAJAPTI (BSP)", "GANGA SINGH (SP)": "GANGA SINGH (SP)", "SHAKIL AHMED (IND)": "SHAKIL AHMED (IND)", "PRAHLAD (IND)": "PRAHLAD (IND)", "MOHD.GULAB (LJP)": "MOHD.GULAB (LJP)", "RAMESH KUMAR (JKNPP)": "RAMESH KUMAR (JKNPP)", "ASIF ALI (IND)": "ASIF ALI (IND)", "VIPIN SHARMA (IND)": "VIPIN SHARMA (IND)", "BRIJ OHAN (IND)": "BRIJ OHAN (IND)", "AVINASH PURI (IND)": "AVINASH PURI (IND)", "NAVEEN KUMAR JAIN (IJP)": "NAVEEN KUMAR JAIN (IJP)", "PARLAD SINGH SAWHNEY (INC)": "PARLAD SINGH SAWHNEY (INC)", "PRAVEEN KHANDELWAL (BJP)": "PRAVEEN KHANDELWAL (BJP)", "KHURRUM IQBAL (LJP)": "KHURRUM IQBAL (LJP)", "MOHD USHTAQ KHAN (BSP)": "MOHD USHTAQ KHAN (BSP)", "ABDUL RAIS (RPI(A))": "ABDUL RAIS (RPI(A))", "CHETAN TAANK (ABHM)": "CHETAN TAANK (ABHM)", "HARJEET SINGH LAMBA (SP)": "HARJEET SINGH LAMBA (SP)", "BALRAM BARI (IND)": "BALRAM BARI (IND)", "AJAY ITTAL (IND)": "AJAY ITTAL (IND)", "SALIM SAHRAJI (IND)": "SALIM SAHRAJI (IND)", "DEV RAJ (IND)": "DEV RAJ (IND)", "NASREEN ISAQ ALIK (AIMF)": "NASREEN ISAQ ALIK (AIMF)", "OHD SAMI (IND)": "OHD SAMI (IND)", "KHURSHED BANO KHAN (IND)": "KHURSHED BANO KHAN (IND)", "ANIL ANAND (IND)": "ANIL ANAND (IND)", "SHOAIB IQBAL (LJP)": "SHOAIB IQBAL (LJP)", "MEHMOOD ZIA (INC)": "MEHMOOD ZIA (INC)", "ABHEY SINGH YADAV (BSP)": "ABHEY SINGH YADAV (BSP)", "TALAT SULTANA (BJP)": "TALAT SULTANA (BJP)", "MOHD. SHAFIQ (IND)": "MOHD. SHAFIQ (IND)", "PURAN CHAND (NCP)": "PURAN CHAND (NCP)", "NASIRUDDIN (RPI(A))": "NASIRUDDIN (RPI(A))", "RUKHSANA (AIMF)": "RUKHSANA (AIMF)", "IKRAMUDDIN (JD(U))": "IKRAMUDDIN (JD(U))", "SMT. CHANDER KANTA BHARTI (IND)": "SMT. CHANDER KANTA BHARTI (IND)", "SATISH KUMAR DHAWAN (IND)": "SATISH KUMAR DHAWAN (IND)", "JAINI PRASAD (IND)": "JAINI PRASAD (IND)", "HAFIZUL HAQUE (IND)": "HAFIZUL HAQUE (IND)", "SIBGHAT ULLAH (IND)": "SIBGHAT ULLAH (IND)", "TARIQ IRZA (JKNPP)": "TARIQ IRZA (JKNPP)", "GANGA RAM (IJP)": "GANGA RAM (IJP)", "AHENDRA (RHC)": "AHENDRA (RHC)", "GURDEEP SINGH CHAWLA (SP)": "GURDEEP SINGH CHAWLA (SP)", "VIKRAM SINGH (IND)": "VIKRAM SINGH (IND)", "HAROON YASUF (INC)": "HAROON YASUF (INC)", "MOTI LAL SODHI (BJP)": "MOTI LAL SODHI (BJP)", "MUSHRAFIN (BSP)": "MUSHRAFIN (BSP)", "UBEAD IQBAL (LJP)": "UBEAD IQBAL (LJP)", "MD.SABAUDDIN (RJD)": "MD.SABAUDDIN (RJD)", "WASEEM QURESHI (IND)": "WASEEM QURESHI (IND)", "AJAY KUMAR (ABHM)": "AJAY KUMAR (ABHM)", "NOOR JAHAN (AIMF)": "NOOR JAHAN (AIMF)", "RAJENDER KUMAR (SP)": "RAJENDER KUMAR (SP)", "OHD. ABDULLAH (IND)": "OHD. ABDULLAH (IND)", "SHAFIQ KHAN (MBP)": "SHAFIQ KHAN (MBP)", "AIEMUDDIN (IJP)": "AIEMUDDIN (IJP)", "SURENDER PAL RATAWAL (BJP)": "SURENDER PAL RATAWAL (BJP)", "MADAN KHORWAL (INC)": "MADAN KHORWAL (INC)", "VEENA SINGH (BSP)": "VEENA SINGH (BSP)", "NATHU PRASAD (CPM)": "NATHU PRASAD (CPM)", "RAM BABU (IND)": "RAM BABU (IND)", "RAJESH KUMAR GIHARA (NCP)": "RAJESH KUMAR GIHARA (NCP)", "GYAN CHAND (LJP)": "GYAN CHAND (LJP)", "VIJAY KUMAR (AIMF)": "VIJAY KUMAR (AIMF)", "DAN LAL SURYAWANSHI (IND)": "DAN LAL SURYAWANSHI (IND)", "RAJESH LILOTHIA (INC)": "RAJESH LILOTHIA (INC)", "ANITA ARYA (BJP)": "ANITA ARYA (BJP)", "MADAN LAL (BSP)": "MADAN LAL (BSP)", "SUNIL PAWAR (IND)": "SUNIL PAWAR (IND)", "GHANSHYAM ORWAL (DBP)": "GHANSHYAM ORWAL (DBP)", "DR.BANARSI DASS (IND)": "DR.BANARSI DASS (IND)", "MADAN LAL (IND)": "MADAN LAL (IND)", "RITA (IND)": "RITA (IND)", "PURAN CHAND GAUTAM (IND)": "PURAN CHAND GAUTAM (IND)", "DAYANAND (IJP)": "DAYANAND (IJP)", "KIRAN KUMAR (IND)": "KIRAN KUMAR (IND)", "SUBHASH SACHDEVA (BJP)": "SUBHASH SACHDEVA (BJP)", "ANJALI RAI (INC)": "ANJALI RAI (INC)", "VIRENDER KUMAR AHAJAN (BSP)": "VIRENDER KUMAR AHAJAN (BSP)", "LAL BABU PANDEY (SP)": "LAL BABU PANDEY (SP)", "ABDUL WAHEED (LJP)": "ABDUL WAHEED (LJP)", "SANJEEV GUPTA (IND)": "SANJEEV GUPTA (IND)", "MATHURESH LAL (IND)": "MATHURESH LAL (IND)", "MANISH KUMAR SHARMA (IND)": "MANISH KUMAR SHARMA (IND)", "SUNITA DEVI (DBP)": "SUNITA DEVI (DBP)", "UMTAJ (IND)": "UMTAJ (IND)", "EKU RAM (RSMD)": "EKU RAM (RSMD)", "RAKESH SHARMA (IND)": "RAKESH SHARMA (IND)", "CHARANJEEV EHTA (IND)": "CHARANJEEV EHTA (IND)", "AMIT DUTT (IND)": "AMIT DUTT (IND)", "MALA RAM GANGWAL (INC)": "MALA RAM GANGWAL (INC)", "KAILASH SANKLA (BJP)": "KAILASH SANKLA (BJP)", "MOHAN LAL (BSP)": "MOHAN LAL (BSP)", "MALA RAM (IND)": "MALA RAM (IND)", "NIRMALA (IND)": "NIRMALA (IND)", "DEEPAK KUMAR (IND)": "DEEPAK KUMAR (IND)", "A DAYA NAND CHANDELA A (INC)": "A DAYA NAND CHANDELA A (INC)", "AVTAR SINGH HIT (SAD(M))": "AVTAR SINGH HIT (SAD(M))", "DULI CHAND (NCP)": "DULI CHAND (NCP)", "SHAMSHER SINGH EHENDI (BSP)": "SHAMSHER SINGH EHENDI (BSP)", "VINOD SHARMA (IND)": "VINOD SHARMA (IND)", "BALBIR SINGH BIR (IND)": "BALBIR SINGH BIR (IND)", "NAWAB SINGH (IND)": "NAWAB SINGH (IND)", "BAHAR IYA (RAM)": "BAHAR IYA (RAM)", "RAJINDAR KUMAR (IND)": "RAJINDAR KUMAR (IND)", "SARABJEET SINGH (IND)": "SARABJEET SINGH (IND)", "ARJEET KAUR (BPC)": "ARJEET KAUR (BPC)", "IT CHANDELA (IND)": "IT CHANDELA (IND)", "DALJEET SINGH (IND)": "DALJEET SINGH (IND)", "KULDEEP SINGH ANAND (IND)": "KULDEEP SINGH ANAND (IND)", "BHAGWAN DASS (HRS)": "BHAGWAN DASS (HRS)", "AVTAR SINGH DIWAN (IND)": "AVTAR SINGH DIWAN (IND)", "JAI PRAKASH DHIMAN (IND)": "JAI PRAKASH DHIMAN (IND)", "JAI PRAKASH LOHIA (IND)": "JAI PRAKASH LOHIA (IND)", "GAJENDRA YADAV (IND)": "GAJENDRA YADAV (IND)", "OM PRAKASH (IND)": "OM PRAKASH (IND)", "VIJENDER (IND)": "VIJENDER (IND)", "RASID KHAN (IND)": "RASID KHAN (IND)", "HARSHARAN SINGH BALLI (BJP)": "HARSHARAN SINGH BALLI (BJP)", "RAMESH LAMBA (INC)": "RAMESH LAMBA (INC)", "PREM SHARMA (BSP)": "PREM SHARMA (BSP)", "SUMIT CHUGH (IND)": "SUMIT CHUGH (IND)", "FEROZ KHAN (JD(U))": "FEROZ KHAN (JD(U))", "RAJINDER SINGH (IND)": "RAJINDER SINGH (IND)", "JASVINDER SINGH (IND)": "JASVINDER SINGH (IND)", "SATISH KAPOOR (IND)": "SATISH KAPOOR (IND)", "GURPREET SINGH (IND)": "GURPREET SINGH (IND)", "CHANDRA PRAKASH (IND)": "CHANDRA PRAKASH (IND)", "O P BABBAR (BJP)": "O P BABBAR (BJP)", "DR. ANITA BABBAR (INC)": "DR. ANITA BABBAR (INC)", "AJIT SINGH CHADHA (IND)": "AJIT SINGH CHADHA (IND)", "ARVINDER SINGH AKEN (BSP)": "ARVINDER SINGH AKEN (BSP)", "HERRY GULATI (IND)": "HERRY GULATI (IND)", "SURENDER YADAV (IND)": "SURENDER YADAV (IND)", "JAI BHAGWAN (MBP)": "JAI BHAGWAN (MBP)", "ANITA BABBAR (IND)": "ANITA BABBAR (IND)", "SHIV KUMAR TYAGI (IND)": "SHIV KUMAR TYAGI (IND)", "SUDHA POPLI (IND)": "SUDHA POPLI (IND)", "DINESH JAIN (IND)": "DINESH JAIN (IND)", "GURVINDER KAUR (IND)": "GURVINDER KAUR (IND)", "DEEPAK GUPTA (IND)": "DEEPAK GUPTA (IND)", "PROF JAGDISH UKHI (BJP)": "PROF JAGDISH UKHI (BJP)", "DEEPAK ARORA (INC)": "DEEPAK ARORA (INC)", "PREM CHAND DESWAL (BSP)": "PREM CHAND DESWAL (BSP)", "SHIV KUMAR (IND)": "SHIV KUMAR (IND)", "BHARAT PRASAD (IND)": "BHARAT PRASAD (IND)", "AAMIR ANJUM (SP)": "AAMIR ANJUM (SP)", "BALJIT SINGH (IND)": "BALJIT SINGH (IND)", "DEEPAK ARORA (IND)": "DEEPAK ARORA (IND)", "HARISH CHANDRA JOSHI (ABHM)": "HARISH CHANDRA JOSHI (ABHM)", "SIRAJUDDIN KHAN (LJP)": "SIRAJUDDIN KHAN (LJP)", "NAND KISHORE (INC)": "NAND KISHORE (INC)", "KRISHAN GAHLOT (BJP)": "KRISHAN GAHLOT (BJP)", "ASHOK KUMAR LAKRA (BSP)": "ASHOK KUMAR LAKRA (BSP)", "SANJAY SINGH (IND)": "SANJAY SINGH (IND)", "RAVINDER SINGH (IND)": "RAVINDER SINGH (IND)", "BRIJ BHUSHAN (NCP)": "BRIJ BHUSHAN (NCP)", "SHIV PRASAD (IND)": "SHIV PRASAD (IND)", "ITWARI (SP)": "ITWARI (SP)", "PREM VERMA (IND)": "PREM VERMA (IND)", "SHUSHIL KUMAR SHARMA (IND)": "SHUSHIL KUMAR SHARMA (IND)", "VIRENDER KUMAR (IND)": "VIRENDER KUMAR (IND)", "SATISH KUMAR (IND)": "SATISH KUMAR (IND)", "BISHAN SINGH (IND)": "BISHAN SINGH (IND)", "AHENDER KUMAR (BJSH)": "AHENDER KUMAR (BJSH)", "DILBAG SINGH (IND)": "DILBAG SINGH (IND)", "INDERJEET VERMA (IND)": "INDERJEET VERMA (IND)", "BHOPAL SINGH (ABHM)": "BHOPAL SINGH (ABHM)", "JITENDER SINGH (RSMD)": "JITENDER SINGH (RSMD)", "MUKESH SHARMA (INC)": "MUKESH SHARMA (INC)", "PAWAN SHARMA (BJP)": "PAWAN SHARMA (BJP)", "RAJENDER BHARDWAJ (NCP)": "RAJENDER BHARDWAJ (NCP)", "OM PRAKASH JAIN (BSP)": "OM PRAKASH JAIN (BSP)", "RAJ BALA (IND)": "RAJ BALA (IND)", "RAMESH KUMAR JAIN (IND)": "RAMESH KUMAR JAIN (IND)", "NAVEEN KUMAR (IND)": "NAVEEN KUMAR (IND)", "M R SHARMA (SP)": "M R SHARMA (SP)", "PREM CHAND PRAJAPATI (IJP)": "PREM CHAND PRAJAPATI (IJP)", "ZILEY SINGH (IND)": "ZILEY SINGH (IND)", "KISHAN LAL VERMA (RTKP)": "KISHAN LAL VERMA (RTKP)", "SITA SHARMA (LJP)": "SITA SHARMA (LJP)", "OM BIR (IND)": "OM BIR (IND)", "SHOBHA KAUSHIK (BPC)": "SHOBHA KAUSHIK (BPC)", "MAHABAL ISHRA (INC)": "MAHABAL ISHRA (INC)", "PARDUYMN RAJPUT (BJP)": "PARDUYMN RAJPUT (BJP)", "BABU RAM (BSP)": "BABU RAM (BSP)", "MUKESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY (CPM)": "MUKESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY (CPM)", "SUBHASH KUMAR CHAUDHARY (IND)": "SUBHASH KUMAR CHAUDHARY (IND)", "JOGENDRA SINGH (RJD)": "JOGENDRA SINGH (RJD)", "KAPIL KUMAR (SP)": "KAPIL KUMAR (SP)", "RAJESH SINHA (IND)": "RAJESH SINHA (IND)", "MUKESH KUMAR (IND)": "MUKESH KUMAR (IND)", "OM PRAKASH INDORA (IND)": "OM PRAKASH INDORA (IND)", "RAMESH KUMAR HOTLA (IND)": "RAMESH KUMAR HOTLA (IND)", "BISHNU PATHAK (LJP)": "BISHNU PATHAK (LJP)", "UKESH KUMAR (IND)": "UKESH KUMAR (IND)", "ANIL KUMAR SINGH (IND)": "ANIL KUMAR SINGH (IND)", "SUMESH (INC)": "SUMESH (INC)", "KAMAL JEET (BJP)": "KAMAL JEET (BJP)", "MANOJ BHARDWAJ (BSP)": "MANOJ BHARDWAJ (BSP)", "RAO SATVIR SINGH (IND)": "RAO SATVIR SINGH (IND)", "NIDHI AHAJAN (BRSP)": "NIDHI AHAJAN (BRSP)", "ANITA (SP)": "ANITA (SP)", "RANJEET SINGH (LJP)": "RANJEET SINGH (LJP)", "RAO RAMANAND (IND)": "RAO RAMANAND (IND)", "RANDHIR SINGH (IND)": "RANDHIR SINGH (IND)", "OP SHARMA (IND)": "OP SHARMA (IND)", "OHAMAD ANJOOR (IND)": "OHAMAD ANJOOR (IND)", "RAJESH KUMAR DUBEY (VAJP)": "RAJESH KUMAR DUBEY (VAJP)", "ANIL JINDAL (IND)": "ANIL JINDAL (IND)", "ANS RAJ TYAGI (IND)": "ANS RAJ TYAGI (IND)", "POORAN SINGH (IND)": "POORAN SINGH (IND)", "BHARAT SINGH (IND)": "BHARAT SINGH (IND)", "KANWAL SINGH YADAV (INC)": "KANWAL SINGH YADAV (INC)", "BIJANDER DUTT (BSP)": "BIJANDER DUTT (BSP)", "RAJESH SHARMA (BJP)": "RAJESH SHARMA (BJP)", "RANBIR SINGH KHARB (IND)": "RANBIR SINGH KHARB (IND)", "SHYAM KUMAR (IND)": "SHYAM KUMAR (IND)", "RAMPHAL SHAOKIN (IND)": "RAMPHAL SHAOKIN (IND)", "DINESH KUMAR (IND)": "DINESH KUMAR (IND)", "RAGHUNANDAN SHARMA (IND)": "RAGHUNANDAN SHARMA (IND)", "OM PRAKASH SINGH (SP)": "OM PRAKASH SINGH (SP)", "VEDPAL SINGH (IND)": "VEDPAL SINGH (IND)", "RAJ KUMAR (IND)": "RAJ KUMAR (IND)", "KRISHAN KUMAR (ABSP)": "KRISHAN KUMAR (ABSP)", "JITENDER KUMAR (IND)": "JITENDER KUMAR (IND)", "SAT PRAKASH RANA (BJP)": "SAT PRAKASH RANA (BJP)", "VIJAY SINGH LOCHAV (INC)": "VIJAY SINGH LOCHAV (INC)", "VINOD KUMAR YADAV (BSP)": "VINOD KUMAR YADAV (BSP)", "HARVINDER RANA (IND)": "HARVINDER RANA (IND)", "SURESH CHAND (LJP)": "SURESH CHAND (LJP)", "DHARAM DEV SOLANKI (BJP)": "DHARAM DEV SOLANKI (BJP)", "MAHENDER YADAV (INC)": "MAHENDER YADAV (INC)", "MADAN OHAN (BSP)": "MADAN OHAN (BSP)", "BHAIRAV DUTT DHYANI (CPI)": "BHAIRAV DUTT DHYANI (CPI)", "MAHESH KUMAR (IND)": "MAHESH KUMAR (IND)", "CHANCHAL SHARMA (SAP)": "CHANCHAL SHARMA (SAP)", "MOHAR PAL SANKHLA (LJP)": "MOHAR PAL SANKHLA (LJP)", "PAWAN KUMAR (IND)": "PAWAN KUMAR (IND)", "DEEPAK KUMAR (RJAP)": "DEEPAK KUMAR (RJAP)", "KARAN SINGH TANWAR (BJP)": "KARAN SINGH TANWAR (BJP)", "ASHOK AHUJA (INC)": "ASHOK AHUJA (INC)", "SHRICHAND CHAUHAN (BSP)": "SHRICHAND CHAUHAN (BSP)", "SANDEEP (IND)": "SANDEEP (IND)", "SANJAY ANGAL (IND)": "SANJAY ANGAL (IND)", "BAL KUMAR SINGH (IJP)": "BAL KUMAR SINGH (IJP)", "ISHWAR SINGH JAKHAR (RRD)": "ISHWAR SINGH JAKHAR (RRD)", "ANITA RAJ SHARMA (NSCP)": "ANITA RAJ SHARMA (NSCP)", "PREM RAVI (IND)": "PREM RAVI (IND)", "RAMESH LOHIA (IND)": "RAMESH LOHIA (IND)", "NARESH KUMAR (IND)": "NARESH KUMAR (IND)", "RAVINDER KUMAR TANWAR (IND)": "RAVINDER KUMAR TANWAR (IND)", "BHUPENDER ROHILA (IND)": "BHUPENDER ROHILA (IND)", "YOGINDER SINGH (IND)": "YOGINDER SINGH (IND)", "TANVIR SINGH DHAMA (IND)": "TANVIR SINGH DHAMA (IND)", "RAMA KANT GOSWAMI (INC)": "RAMA KANT GOSWAMI (INC)", "ASHA YOGI (BJP)": "ASHA YOGI (BJP)", "TRILOK CHAND SHARMA (BSP)": "TRILOK CHAND SHARMA (BSP)", "BHAGWAN DAS (NCP)": "BHAGWAN DAS (NCP)", "SANJAY SEHRAWAT (IND)": "SANJAY SEHRAWAT (IND)", "CHHOTE LAL (RSBP)": "CHHOTE LAL (RSBP)", "MAHENDER RAM (IND)": "MAHENDER RAM (IND)", "SANJEEV KUMAR (IDP)": "SANJEEV KUMAR (IDP)", "SANJAY KUMAR (SP)": "SANJAY KUMAR (SP)", "AUGUST DAGAR (IND)": "AUGUST DAGAR (IND)", "BHOJ KUMAR (JKNPP)": "BHOJ KUMAR (JKNPP)", "JITENDER SINGH (ABHM)": "JITENDER SINGH (ABHM)", "SHEILA DIKSHIT (INC)": "SHEILA DIKSHIT (INC)", "VIJAY JOLLY (BJP)": "VIJAY JOLLY (BJP)", "RAJIV SINGH (BSP)": "RAJIV SINGH (BSP)", "BRIJ OHAN UPRETI (IND)": "BRIJ OHAN UPRETI (IND)", "RAMANAND ADHWAL (IND)": "RAMANAND ADHWAL (IND)", "OM PRAKASH (SP)": "OM PRAKASH (SP)", "HARSH ALHOTRA (JKNPP)": "HARSH ALHOTRA (JKNPP)", "ANITA SINGH (RKJP)": "ANITA SINGH (RKJP)", "PRITHVI CHANDRA BAITHA (IND)": "PRITHVI CHANDRA BAITHA (IND)", "HARIOM SHARMA (IND)": "HARIOM SHARMA (IND)", "NIRUPMA SHARMA (IND)": "NIRUPMA SHARMA (IND)", "UKESH KUMAR SAXENA (ABHM)": "UKESH KUMAR SAXENA (ABHM)", "KUSUM BAHL (IND)": "KUSUM BAHL (IND)", "PRADEEP KUMAR SINGH (LJP)": "PRADEEP KUMAR SINGH (LJP)", "VED PAL SHASTRI (IND)": "VED PAL SHASTRI (IND)", "LILA DEVI (JD(U))": "LILA DEVI (JD(U))", "SHAKEEL AHMED (RBCP)": "SHAKEEL AHMED (RBCP)", "ABHISHEK KUMAR RAO (LKPT)": "ABHISHEK KUMAR RAO (LKPT)", "OHAMAD TAHIR (AIMF)": "OHAMAD TAHIR (AIMF)", "NIRAJA JHA (RVNP)": "NIRAJA JHA (RVNP)", "PRITI VADERA (IND)": "PRITI VADERA (IND)", "LAKSHMI BHARDWAJ (IND)": "LAKSHMI BHARDWAJ (IND)", "KALPANA GUPTA (RPI(A))": "KALPANA GUPTA (RPI(A))", "KARAM CHAND LATHWAL (BPC)": "KARAM CHAND LATHWAL (BPC)", "NIMMI SAYYED (NJD)": "NIMMI SAYYED (NJD)", "TARVINDER SINGH ARWAH (INC)": "TARVINDER SINGH ARWAH (INC)", "MANJINDER SINGH SIRSA (BJP)": "MANJINDER SINGH SIRSA (BJP)", "GAJE SINGH (BSP)": "GAJE SINGH (BSP)", "HASEEN AHMED SIDDIQI (LJP)": "HASEEN AHMED SIDDIQI (LJP)", "PRAVEEN KUMAR JAIN (IND)": "PRAVEEN KUMAR JAIN (IND)", "VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA (BPD)": "VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA (BPD)", "MD.KALEEM (RPI(A))": "MD.KALEEM (RPI(A))", "LAXMI (UWF)": "LAXMI (UWF)", "PUSHPA DEVI (LPSP)": "PUSHPA DEVI (LPSP)", "SURESH GUPTA (IJP)": "SURESH GUPTA (IJP)", "NEERAJ BASOYA (INC)": "NEERAJ BASOYA (INC)", "SUSHIL CHOUDHARY (BJP)": "SUSHIL CHOUDHARY (BJP)", "SATISH BASOYA (BSP)": "SATISH BASOYA (BSP)", "PREM BABBAR (SP)": "PREM BABBAR (SP)", "SURESH (IND)": "SURESH (IND)", "JAMEEL AHMAD (IND)": "JAMEEL AHMAD (IND)", "MANISH KATHURIA (IND)": "MANISH KATHURIA (IND)", "AMIT ISHRA (IND)": "AMIT ISHRA (IND)", "KIRAN WALIA (INC)": "KIRAN WALIA (INC)", "RAM BHAJ (BJP)": "RAM BHAJ (BJP)", "SHRI PAL SAINI (BSP)": "SHRI PAL SAINI (BSP)", "JAVED AROOQUI (LJP)": "JAVED AROOQUI (LJP)", "RAFIK (IND)": "RAFIK (IND)", "RAJIV ALHOTRA (IND)": "RAJIV ALHOTRA (IND)", "AJIT JOHN (IND)": "AJIT JOHN (IND)", "HANIF OHAMMAD KHAN (NJD)": "HANIF OHAMMAD KHAN (NJD)", "RAJEEV KHOSLA (JKNPP)": "RAJEEV KHOSLA (JKNPP)", "TULSI PRASAD YADAV (NSCP)": "TULSI PRASAD YADAV (NSCP)", "BARKHA SINGH (INC)": "BARKHA SINGH (INC)", "RADHEY SHYAM SHARMA (BJP)": "RADHEY SHYAM SHARMA (BJP)", "KULBIR SINGH (BSP)": "KULBIR SINGH (BSP)", "RAJA RAM (LJP)": "RAJA RAM (LJP)", "G SIVASANKARAN (IND)": "G SIVASANKARAN (IND)", "SATISH (IND)": "SATISH (IND)", "YAMUNA CHAND (IND)": "YAMUNA CHAND (IND)", "SURAJ BHAN (RJAP)": "SURAJ BHAN (RJAP)", "JASWANT RAI NIM (IND)": "JASWANT RAI NIM (IND)", "DR. YOGANAND SHASTRI (INC)": "DR. YOGANAND SHASTRI (INC)", "SHER SINGH DAGAR (BJP)": "SHER SINGH DAGAR (BJP)", "SATBIR SINGH (IND)": "SATBIR SINGH (IND)", "VED PARKASH (BSP)": "VED PARKASH (BSP)", "JAGDISH SINGH LOHIA (NCP)": "JAGDISH SINGH LOHIA (NCP)", "ARVIND GUPTA (RKJP)": "ARVIND GUPTA (RKJP)", "ABDUL SALEEM (IND)": "ABDUL SALEEM (IND)", "SANDEEP PNAWAR (IND)": "SANDEEP PNAWAR (IND)", "KUNWAR PAL SINGH (NJD)": "KUNWAR PAL SINGH (NJD)", "RAGHUNATH CHAUHAN (RJAP)": "RAGHUNATH CHAUHAN (RJAP)", "ANJU SINGH (IND)": "ANJU SINGH (IND)", "SHAHEEDA PARWIN (LJP)": "SHAHEEDA PARWIN (LJP)", "TRIBHUVAN SINGH (IND)": "TRIBHUVAN SINGH (IND)", "BALRAM TANWAR (INC)": "BALRAM TANWAR (INC)", "BRAHM SINGH TANWAR (BJP)": "BRAHM SINGH TANWAR (BJP)", "KANWAR SINGH TANWAR (BSP)": "KANWAR SINGH TANWAR (BSP)", "HIRA LAL SINGH (IND)": "HIRA LAL SINGH (IND)", "PREM RAJ (RLD)": "PREM RAJ (RLD)", "KIRAN SINGH (SHS)": "KIRAN SINGH (SHS)", "RAFIK AHMAD (IND)": "RAFIK AHMAD (IND)", "BIR SINGH (IND)": "BIR SINGH (IND)", "CH.PARTAP SINGH TANWAR (LJP)": "CH.PARTAP SINGH TANWAR (LJP)", "RAM SIRJAN BHAGAT (LPSP)": "RAM SIRJAN BHAGAT (LPSP)", "SANJAY SINGH (NJD)": "SANJAY SINGH (NJD)", "ARVINDER SINGH (INC)": "ARVINDER SINGH (INC)", "SHRI LAL (BSP)": "SHRI LAL (BSP)", "BHIM SINGH (BJP)": "BHIM SINGH (BJP)", "DAL CHAND KAPIL (LJP)": "DAL CHAND KAPIL (LJP)", "CHINKI DEVI (RBCP)": "CHINKI DEVI (RBCP)", "CH.PREM SINGH (INC)": "CH.PREM SINGH (INC)", "SURESH CHAND (BJP)": "SURESH CHAND (BJP)", "PRAHLAD KUMAR ALVIYA (BSP)": "PRAHLAD KUMAR ALVIYA (BSP)", "DALIP VALMIKI (LJP)": "DALIP VALMIKI (LJP)", "TRILOK (IND)": "TRILOK (IND)", "PRAVEEN PARCHA (RJAP)": "PRAVEEN PARCHA (RJAP)", "DR. S.C.L.GUPTA (BJP)": "DR. S.C.L.GUPTA (BJP)", "AMOD KUMAR KANTH (INC)": "AMOD KUMAR KANTH (INC)", "RANJIT SINGH (BSP)": "RANJIT SINGH (BSP)", "VIR SINGH (NCP)": "VIR SINGH (NCP)", "A.K.GUPTA (SP)": "A.K.GUPTA (SP)", "SURESH CHOUDHARY (LJP)": "SURESH CHOUDHARY (LJP)", "VIJAY DUA (IND)": "VIJAY DUA (IND)", "REKHA (IND)": "REKHA (IND)", "KARAN SINGH KADAM (RBCP)": "KARAN SINGH KADAM (RBCP)", "D.NASIR KHAN (NLHP)": "D.NASIR KHAN (NLHP)", "KAILASH GIRI (IND)": "KAILASH GIRI (IND)", "OHD.ANWAR ALAM (IND)": "OHD.ANWAR ALAM (IND)", "JAG PRASAD (IND)": "JAG PRASAD (IND)", "BIMAL GUPTA (IND)": "BIMAL GUPTA (IND)", "BRAHM PAL SINGH (IJP)": "BRAHM PAL SINGH (IJP)", "AHESH CHANDRA SINGH (JD(U))": "AHESH CHANDRA SINGH (JD(U))", "VIJAY KUMAR ALHOTRA (BJP)": "VIJAY KUMAR ALHOTRA (BJP)", "JITENDER KUMAR KOCHER (INC)": "JITENDER KUMAR KOCHER (INC)", "RAJENDRA KUMAR GUPTA (BSP)": "RAJENDRA KUMAR GUPTA (BSP)", "RAJU (SHS)": "RAJU (SHS)", "JITENDAR KUMAR GUPTA (BPC)": "JITENDAR KUMAR GUPTA (BPC)", "HARISH BHARDWAJ (IND)": "HARISH BHARDWAJ (IND)", "NEELAM SAXENA (SP)": "NEELAM SAXENA (SP)", "SURYA PRAKASH LOONKER (BPD)": "SURYA PRAKASH LOONKER (BPD)", "CHANDER KALA (IND)": "CHANDER KALA (IND)", "RAI ANOOP PRASAD (NSCP)": "RAI ANOOP PRASAD (NSCP)", "SUNITA CHAUDHARY (JKNPP)": "SUNITA CHAUDHARY (JKNPP)", "SUBHASH CHOPRA (INC)": "SUBHASH CHOPRA (INC)", "JAI GOPAL ABROL (BJP)": "JAI GOPAL ABROL (BJP)", "AVINASH KAUR (BSP)": "AVINASH KAUR (BSP)", "SUSHIL KUMAR AGARWAL (IND)": "SUSHIL KUMAR AGARWAL (IND)", "OM PRAKASH ABROL (IND)": "OM PRAKASH ABROL (IND)", "LAVESH KUMAR GAUTAM (IND)": "LAVESH KUMAR GAUTAM (IND)", "MOHD. ALAM (IND)": "MOHD. ALAM (IND)", "RAMESH BIDHURI (BJP)": "RAMESH BIDHURI (BJP)", "SAHI RAM (BSP)": "SAHI RAM (BSP)", "SHISH PAL SINGH (INC)": "SHISH PAL SINGH (INC)", "HANS RAJ NAGAR (IND)": "HANS RAJ NAGAR (IND)", "MUNNA (RBCP)": "MUNNA (RBCP)", "BIRJU NAYAK (IND)": "BIRJU NAYAK (IND)", "RAJESHWARI EENA (IND)": "RAJESHWARI EENA (IND)", "REKHA SINGH (IND)": "REKHA SINGH (IND)", "AMIT BIDHURI (IND)": "AMIT BIDHURI (IND)", "SUDESH (LJP)": "SUDESH (LJP)", "NARESH JAIN (IND)": "NARESH JAIN (IND)", "ATIBAL SINGH (IND)": "ATIBAL SINGH (IND)", "PRAKASH CHAND (IND)": "PRAKASH CHAND (IND)", "RAM SINGH NETAJI (BSP)": "RAM SINGH NETAJI (BSP)", "RAMBIR SINGH BIDHURI (INC)": "RAMBIR SINGH BIDHURI (INC)", "KHEM CHAND (BJP)": "KHEM CHAND (BJP)", "BINOD RAJ JHA (LJP)": "BINOD RAJ JHA (LJP)", "OM PRAKASH GUPTA (IND)": "OM PRAKASH GUPTA (IND)", "M.S.KHAN (SP)": "M.S.KHAN (SP)", "RAM NATH SHARMA (RBCP)": "RAM NATH SHARMA (RBCP)", "VIRENDER SINGH (JD(U))": "VIRENDER SINGH (JD(U))", "PARVEZ HASHMI (INC)": "PARVEZ HASHMI (INC)", "ASIF OHD.KHAN (RJD)": "ASIF OHD.KHAN (RJD)", "BRAHAM SINGH (BSP)": "BRAHAM SINGH (BSP)", "SURENDER KUMAR (BJP)": "SURENDER KUMAR (BJP)", "WASIM AHMED GHAZI (SP)": "WASIM AHMED GHAZI (SP)", "AMANAT ULLAH KHAN (LJP)": "AMANAT ULLAH KHAN (LJP)", "MOHD.KAMRAN SIDDIQUI (NLHP)": "MOHD.KAMRAN SIDDIQUI (NLHP)", "RAZA HAIDER (CPM)": "RAZA HAIDER (CPM)", "AMIRUDDIN (CPI)": "AMIRUDDIN (CPI)", "CHANDER PAL (IND)": "CHANDER PAL (IND)", "SANTOSH KUMAR (IND)": "SANTOSH KUMAR (IND)", "OHAMMAD AYUB (IND)": "OHAMMAD AYUB (IND)", "ANAND (IND)": "ANAND (IND)", "SYED OHAMMAD OHSIN (NADP)": "SYED OHAMMAD OHSIN (NADP)", "R ISLAM (AIMF)": "R ISLAM (AIMF)", "OHD.SHAHID (JD(U))": "OHD.SHAHID (JD(U))", "JAMALUDDIN (IND)": "JAMALUDDIN (IND)", "AKHAR ALAM (RPI(A))": "AKHAR ALAM (RPI(A))", "ALEEM (IND)": "ALEEM (IND)", "SUNIL KUMAR (BJP)": "SUNIL KUMAR (BJP)", "ANJANA (INC)": "ANJANA (INC)", "GANGA RAM (BSP)": "GANGA RAM (BSP)", "LOVEKUSH SAGAR (RPI(A))": "LOVEKUSH SAGAR (RPI(A))", "AJAY (IND)": "AJAY (IND)", "PREM CHAND (IND)": "PREM CHAND (IND)", "CHARAN DASS (IND)": "CHARAN DASS (IND)", "FATEH SINGH (IND)": "FATEH SINGH (IND)", "AMRISH SINGH GAUTAM (INC)": "AMRISH SINGH GAUTAM (INC)", "DUSHYANT GAUTAM (BJP)": "DUSHYANT GAUTAM (BJP)", "CHANDER PAL SINGH (BSP)": "CHANDER PAL SINGH (BSP)", "SHIV DUTT (IND)": "SHIV DUTT (IND)", "MADAN PAL SINGH (LJP)": "MADAN PAL SINGH (LJP)", "RAJAN (IND)": "RAJAN (IND)", "KANTA (JKNPP)": "KANTA (JKNPP)", "MADAN LAL (IJP)": "MADAN LAL (IJP)", "NARENDER KUMAR (IND)": "NARENDER KUMAR (IND)", "PARVEEN KUMAR KAIM (IND)": "PARVEEN KUMAR KAIM (IND)", "RAJENDER KUMAR (RPI(A))": "RAJENDER KUMAR (RPI(A))", "ANIL KUMAR (INC)": "ANIL KUMAR (INC)", "NAKUL BHARDWAJ (BJP)": "NAKUL BHARDWAJ (BJP)", "MADAN SINGH (BSP)": "MADAN SINGH (BSP)", "SHASHI KUMAR (CPI)": "SHASHI KUMAR (CPI)", "PARMOD (IND)": "PARMOD (IND)", "KRISHAN KAMAL (NCP)": "KRISHAN KAMAL (NCP)", "JAIVEER CHAUDHARY (SP)": "JAIVEER CHAUDHARY (SP)", "SHYAMJI RAI (ABHM)": "SHYAMJI RAI (ABHM)", "GOPAL LAL SHARMA (IND)": "GOPAL LAL SHARMA (IND)", "SHER OHAMMED (JD(U))": "SHER OHAMMED (JD(U))", "DR. ASHOK KUMAR WALIA (INC)": "DR. ASHOK KUMAR WALIA (INC)", "MURARI SINGH PANWAR (BJP)": "MURARI SINGH PANWAR (BJP)", "AVINASH SHARMA (BSP)": "AVINASH SHARMA (BSP)", "YASHODA RANI (IND)": "YASHODA RANI (IND)", "OMVIR SINGH YADAV (SP)": "OMVIR SINGH YADAV (SP)", "RAJU PRASAD GUPTA (RLD)": "RAJU PRASAD GUPTA (RLD)", "GULZAR AHMAD (IND)": "GULZAR AHMAD (IND)", "KANTA (UPUDF)": "KANTA (UPUDF)", "OM PRAKASH SINGH (IND)": "OM PRAKASH SINGH (IND)", "VINAY KUMAR SHARMA (JD(U))": "VINAY KUMAR SHARMA (JD(U))", "NASEEB SINGH (INC)": "NASEEB SINGH (INC)", "OM PRAKASH SHARMA (BJP)": "OM PRAKASH SHARMA (BJP)", "NARENDRA KUMAR PANDEY (BSP)": "NARENDRA KUMAR PANDEY (BSP)", "DEEPAK GUPTA (DBP)": "DEEPAK GUPTA (DBP)", "SUDESH KUMAR JAIN (IND)": "SUDESH KUMAR JAIN (IND)", "RAM KUMAR (IND)": "RAM KUMAR (IND)", "KAMAR AHMAD (IND)": "KAMAR AHMAD (IND)", "RAM SINGH (IND)": "RAM SINGH (IND)", "MOHD SHAH (IND)": "MOHD SHAH (IND)", "SANJAY SHARMA (RSSHP)": "SANJAY SHARMA (RSSHP)", "HENDER KUMAR RMA,ADVOCATE (SHS)": "HENDER KUMAR RMA,ADVOCATE (SHS)", "BRAHMJIT (IND)": "BRAHMJIT (IND)", "GIRJESH BAHADUR SINGH (IND)": "GIRJESH BAHADUR SINGH (IND)", "HARSH VARDHAN (BJP)": "HARSH VARDHAN (BJP)", "DEEPIKA KHULLAR (INC)": "DEEPIKA KHULLAR (INC)", "KAMRUDDIN (BSP)": "KAMRUDDIN (BSP)", "CHANDAN LAL PREMI (CPI)": "CHANDAN LAL PREMI (CPI)", "RADHA YADAV, ADVOCATE (BJSH)": "RADHA YADAV, ADVOCATE (BJSH)", "MONIKA AHAJAN (IND)": "MONIKA AHAJAN (IND)", "SANJAY KUMAR GUPTA (IND)": "SANJAY KUMAR GUPTA (IND)", "SURAJ PRAKASH (IND)": "SURAJ PRAKASH (IND)", "VED PRAKASH GUPTA (RWS)": "VED PRAKASH GUPTA (RWS)", "BALWANT SINGH PARWANA (IND)": "BALWANT SINGH PARWANA (IND)", "PRAFULLA CHANDER OHAN (IND)": "PRAFULLA CHANDER OHAN (IND)", "HENDER KUMAR JAIN (IND)": "HENDER KUMAR JAIN (IND)", "PRITHVI PAL SINGH (IND)": "PRITHVI PAL SINGH (IND)", "SHIV PRAKASH TIWARI (RSSHP)": "SHIV PRAKASH TIWARI (RSSHP)", "KUNJESH PASSI (IND)": "KUNJESH PASSI (IND)", "IRSHAD (IND)": "IRSHAD (IND)", "GOVIND SAHNI (IND)": "GOVIND SAHNI (IND)", "OHD ISLAM (IND)": "OHD ISLAM (IND)", "ARVINDER SINGH LOVELY (INC)": "ARVINDER SINGH LOVELY (INC)", "KAMAL KUMAR JAIN (BJP)": "KAMAL KUMAR JAIN (BJP)", "SANJAY GAUR (BSP)": "SANJAY GAUR (BSP)", "LEKH RAJ (BJSH)": "LEKH RAJ (BJSH)", "SAPAN KUMAR ARORA (LJP)": "SAPAN KUMAR ARORA (LJP)", "AJAY TOMAR (IND)": "AJAY TOMAR (IND)", "ANJUM BHARTI (BSP(K))": "ANJUM BHARTI (BSP(K))", "ABDUL QADIR (LPI(V))": "ABDUL QADIR (LPI(V))", "DR. NARENDER NATH (INC)": "DR. NARENDER NATH (INC)", "JITENDER SINGH SHUNTY (BJP)": "JITENDER SINGH SHUNTY (BJP)", "VIJAY PAL (BSP)": "VIJAY PAL (BSP)", "NEELAM KUMARI (RJD)": "NEELAM KUMARI (RJD)", "SURESH KUMAR (IND)": "SURESH KUMAR (IND)", "TAHIRA IRZA (IND)": "TAHIRA IRZA (IND)", "MAHANDRA ANCHANDA (SHS)": "MAHANDRA ANCHANDA (SHS)", "SUBHASH GAHLOT (VAJP)": "SUBHASH GAHLOT (VAJP)", "SANJAY LOHIA (IND)": "SANJAY LOHIA (IND)", "SUBHASH ISHRA (SP)": "SUBHASH ISHRA (SP)", "NAVEEN PARKASH GOYAL (IND)": "NAVEEN PARKASH GOYAL (IND)", "RANGI LAL YADAV (IND)": "RANGI LAL YADAV (IND)", "ANISH GUPTA (IND)": "ANISH GUPTA (IND)", "ASGAR ALIK (IND)": "ASGAR ALIK (IND)", "VEER SINGH DHINGAN (INC)": "VEER SINGH DHINGAN (INC)", "CHANDRA PAL SINGH (BJP)": "CHANDRA PAL SINGH (BJP)", "LALLAN PRASAD (BSP)": "LALLAN PRASAD (BSP)", "RAJ DULARI (NLHP)": "RAJ DULARI (NLHP)", "MANGE RAM (IND)": "MANGE RAM (IND)", "SANTOSH KUMAR (LJP)": "SANTOSH KUMAR (LJP)", "DEVENDER KUMAR (IDP)": "DEVENDER KUMAR (IDP)", "SUKKAN LAL (RWS)": "SUKKAN LAL (RWS)", "DHANI RAM (UNLP)": "DHANI RAM (UNLP)", "ARDEEP (IND)": "ARDEEP (IND)", "BHAGWAN SAHAI (IJP)": "BHAGWAN SAHAI (IJP)", "VIJAY KUMAR (VAJP)": "VIJAY KUMAR (VAJP)", "RAM BABU SHARMA (INC)": "RAM BABU SHARMA (INC)", "ALOK KUMAR (BJP)": "ALOK KUMAR (BJP)", "LOKESH DIXIT (BSP)": "LOKESH DIXIT (BSP)", "LAXMAN DASS (IND)": "LAXMAN DASS (IND)", "JITENDRA PANCHAL (SP)": "JITENDRA PANCHAL (SP)", "RAJU SONI (IND)": "RAJU SONI (IND)", "GULSHAN KUMAR RATRA (RWS)": "GULSHAN KUMAR RATRA (RWS)", "R. L. VERMA (RKAP)": "R. L. VERMA (RKAP)", "RAJEEV KUMAR (SHS)": "RAJEEV KUMAR (SHS)", "DHAYAN PAL SINGH (AGRJP)": "DHAYAN PAL SINGH (AGRJP)", "PARVEEN KUMAR (RLD)": "PARVEEN KUMAR (RLD)", "PARDEEP JAIN (LJP)": "PARDEEP JAIN (LJP)", "CHAUDHARY ATEEN AHMAD (INC)": "CHAUDHARY ATEEN AHMAD (INC)", "SITA RAM GUPTA (BJP)": "SITA RAM GUPTA (BJP)", "HAZI AFZZAL (BSP)": "HAZI AFZZAL (BSP)", "MASOOD ALI KHAN (SP)": "MASOOD ALI KHAN (SP)", "MOHD. BADRUL HAQ (RJD)": "MOHD. BADRUL HAQ (RJD)", "MOHD. YUSUF (JD(S))": "MOHD. YUSUF (JD(S))", "HAFIZ AHMED (IND)": "HAFIZ AHMED (IND)", "AYYUB ALI (IND)": "AYYUB ALI (IND)", "SALEEM KHAN (RPI(A))": "SALEEM KHAN (RPI(A))", "D. SABIR SIDDIQI (IND)": "D. SABIR SIDDIQI (IND)", "AFTAB AHMAD (IND)": "AFTAB AHMAD (IND)", "NASIM AHMAD HASHMI (BSP(K))": "NASIM AHMAD HASHMI (BSP(K))", "SHAKIR HUSAIN (LJP)": "SHAKIR HUSAIN (LJP)", "VIQAR AHMAD KHAN (IND)": "VIQAR AHMAD KHAN (IND)", "SHAKILA BEGUM (IND)": "SHAKILA BEGUM (IND)", "SAHAB SINGH CHAUHAN (BJP)": "SAHAB SINGH CHAUHAN (BJP)", "BHEESHMA SHARMA (INC)": "BHEESHMA SHARMA (INC)", "ROHTASH KUMAR (BSP)": "ROHTASH KUMAR (BSP)", "NARESH GAUR (BJP)": "NARESH GAUR (BJP)", "HAZI DILSHAD ALI (BSP)": "HAZI DILSHAD ALI (BSP)", "ANIL KUAMR VASHISHTH (INC)": "ANIL KUAMR VASHISHTH (INC)", "KAILASH CHAND JAIN (IND)": "KAILASH CHAND JAIN (IND)", "MOHD. SHER NABI CHAMAN (IND)": "MOHD. SHER NABI CHAMAN (IND)", "MOHD AHMED (SP)": "MOHD AHMED (SP)", "A K AGGARWAL (AGRJP)": "A K AGGARWAL (AGRJP)", "RAJ KUMAR BHATI (LJP)": "RAJ KUMAR BHATI (LJP)", "S. A. BETAB (IND)": "S. A. BETAB (IND)", "OHD IRFAN (IND)": "OHD IRFAN (IND)", "ABID KHAN (IND)": "ABID KHAN (IND)", "INAMUDDIN (IND)": "INAMUDDIN (IND)", "VIQAR HASHMI (UNLP)": "VIQAR HASHMI (UNLP)", "SURENDRA KUMAR (BSP)": "SURENDRA KUMAR (BSP)", "BALZOR SINGH (INC)": "BALZOR SINGH (INC)", "RANJEET SINGH (BJP)": "RANJEET SINGH (BJP)", "CH. ATEH SINGH (IND)": "CH. ATEH SINGH (IND)", "CHOUDHARY BALRAJ (IND)": "CHOUDHARY BALRAJ (IND)", "ROOP CHAND (RLD)": "ROOP CHAND (RLD)", "RUP KISHOR (IND)": "RUP KISHOR (IND)", "HARI BABU (IJP)": "HARI BABU (IJP)", "SURANDER SINGH (BSKP)": "SURANDER SINGH (BSKP)", "JAI PAL SINGH (SP)": "JAI PAL SINGH (SP)", "HASAN AHMED (INC)": "HASAN AHMED (INC)", "YOGENDER KUMAR SHARMA (BJP)": "YOGENDER KUMAR SHARMA (BJP)", "SHER KHAN ALIK (BSP)": "SHER KHAN ALIK (BSP)", "MD. RAHIS (IND)": "MD. RAHIS (IND)", "SUNIL DHYANI (IND)": "SUNIL DHYANI (IND)", "SAGEER AHMED (IND)": "SAGEER AHMED (IND)", "LAKSHMAN SINGH (IJP)": "LAKSHMAN SINGH (IJP)", "RAJESH KUMAR SHARMA (IND)": "RAJESH KUMAR SHARMA (IND)", "AHMAD SAEED (UNLP)": "AHMAD SAEED (UNLP)", "KRISHAN PAL (BSKP)": "KRISHAN PAL (BSKP)", "SHARAFAT ALI (SP)": "SHARAFAT ALI (SP)", "EENA BEGUM (IND)": "EENA BEGUM (IND)", "KRISHAN PAL (BJSSP)": "KRISHAN PAL (BJSSP)", "SALIMUDDIN (JD(S))": "SALIMUDDIN (JD(S))", "UMESH KAPOOR (IND)": "UMESH KAPOOR (IND)", "PREM PAL (JKNPP)": "PREM PAL (JKNPP)", "EHMOOD HASAN (NLHP)": "EHMOOD HASAN (NLHP)", "MOHAN SINGH BISHT (BJP)": "MOHAN SINGH BISHT (BJP)", "SATAN PAL DAYMA (IND)": "SATAN PAL DAYMA (IND)", "DIWAN SINGH NAYAL (INC)": "DIWAN SINGH NAYAL (INC)", "HARENDER KUMAR SHARMA (BSP)": "HARENDER KUMAR SHARMA (BSP)", "ANMOL CHOUDHARI (CPM)": "ANMOL CHOUDHARI (CPM)", "HASEEB (SP)": "HASEEB (SP)", "JUGAL KISHOR (IJP)": "JUGAL KISHOR (IJP)", "SANJAY SHARMA (SAP)": "SANJAY SHARMA (SAP)", "DESH RAJ (IND)": "DESH RAJ (IND)", "OHD NAFIS (NBNP)": "OHD NAFIS (NBNP)", "SHIV KUMAR SAHU (PSJP)": "SHIV KUMAR SAHU (PSJP)", "HARISH TYAGI (IND)": "HARISH TYAGI (IND)", "PARVEZ (JD(S))": "PARVEZ (JD(S))", "AFZAL AHMED (RJD)": "AFZAL AHMED (RJD)", "LATA SHARMA (IND)": "LATA SHARMA (IND)", "KAVITA TYAGI (IND)": "KAVITA TYAGI (IND)", "SABIR KHAN (IND)": "SABIR KHAN (IND)", "OHD. ABRAR (LJP)": "OHD. ABRAR (LJP)", "R. C. RAGAV (IND)": "R. C. RAGAV (IND)", "VIPIN SANDILYA (LSWP)": "VIPIN SANDILYA (LSWP)", "SANDHYA AGARWAL (UNLP)": "SANDHYA AGARWAL (UNLP)", "KAMLA DEVI (IND)": "KAMLA DEVI (IND)", "NEELAM SAIFI (IND)": "NEELAM SAIFI (IND)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 70, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 70, "registered_not_positive": 70}, "n_stations_flagged": 70, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:31:58.165631", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.768, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.854, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.721, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.569, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.111, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 70}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d8d643c943fa4e1291d4f40bbd29c1ed", "name": "Pakistan 2024 provincial (overnight pakistan_2024_balochistan_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "other", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpakistani.com/ge2024/pb/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"IND_Shah Zaman Kakar": "IND_Shah Zaman Kakar", "IND_Gul Khan Sherani": "IND_Gul Khan Sherani", "IND_Ali Muhammad": "IND_Ali Muhammad", "IND_Noor Ullah Khan": "IND_Noor Ullah Khan", "IND_Naseem Babar": "IND_Naseem Babar", "IND_Cheif Sher Hassan Sherani": "IND_Cheif Sher Hassan Sherani", "IND_Naseebullah Khan": "IND_Naseebullah Khan", "IND_Ghulab Khan": "IND_Ghulab Khan", "IND_Hayat Ullah Shah": "IND_Hayat Ullah Shah", "IND_Khaliq Dad": "IND_Khaliq Dad", "IND_Sadiq Muhammad": "IND_Sadiq Muhammad", "IND_Feroz Khan": "IND_Feroz Khan", "IND_Abdul Ahad": "IND_Abdul Ahad", "IND_Gulab Udin": "IND_Gulab Udin", "IND_Sardar Khan": "IND_Sardar Khan", "IND_Abdul Rahim": "IND_Abdul Rahim", "IND_Qutab Ud Din": "IND_Qutab Ud Din", "IND_Sadam Hussain": "IND_Sadam Hussain", "IND_Abdul Salam Akhundzada": "IND_Abdul Salam Akhundzada", "JUI-F": "JUI-F", "RJUI": "RJUI", "PKMAP": "PKMAP", "PML-N": "PML-N", "PPP": "PPP", "JUI-N": "JUI-N", "JIP": "JIP", "ANP": "ANP", "JUI-S": "JUI-S", "IND_Mitta Khan Kakar": "IND_Mitta Khan Kakar", "IND_Niaz Muhammad Khan": "IND_Niaz Muhammad Khan", "IND_Anwar Jan Kibzai": "IND_Anwar Jan Kibzai", "IND_Adnan Hussain": "IND_Adnan Hussain", "IND_Asfandyar": "IND_Asfandyar", "IND_Muhammad Majeed": "IND_Muhammad Majeed", "IND_Abdul Ghani": "IND_Abdul Ghani", "IND_Muhammad Nazeer": "IND_Muhammad Nazeer", "IND_Muhammad Yousaf": "IND_Muhammad Yousaf", "IND_Ajab Khan": "IND_Ajab Khan", "IND_Amir Khan": "IND_Amir Khan", "IND_Gul Marjan": "IND_Gul Marjan", "IND_Abdullah Khan": "IND_Abdullah Khan", "IND_Juma Gul": "IND_Juma Gul", "IND_Mola Dad": "IND_Mola Dad", "IND_Abdullah Khan (2)": "IND_Abdullah Khan (2)", "IND_Samad Khan": "IND_Samad Khan", "IND_Noor Ud Din": "IND_Noor Ud Din", "IND_Najam Uddin": "IND_Najam Uddin", "PKNAP": "PKNAP", "BAP": "BAP", "IND_Maulana Noor Ullah": "IND_Maulana Noor Ullah", "IND_Hayatullah": "IND_Hayatullah", "IND_Abdul Khaliq": "IND_Abdul Khaliq", "IND_Hifzanullah": "IND_Hifzanullah", "IND_Abdul Qadir": "IND_Abdul Qadir", "IND_Abdul Jalil": "IND_Abdul Jalil", "IND_Gull Zada": "IND_Gull Zada", "IND_Fareed Ahmad": "IND_Fareed Ahmad", "IND_Juma Khan": "IND_Juma Khan", "IND_Mamoon Khan Jogezai": "IND_Mamoon Khan Jogezai", "IND_Mati Ullah": "IND_Mati Ullah", "IND_Amir Zaman": "IND_Amir Zaman", "IND_Mir Masood Khan Khetran": "IND_Mir Masood Khan Khetran", "IND_Abdul Inam Shah Khetran": "IND_Abdul Inam Shah Khetran", "IND_Muhammad Tariq": "IND_Muhammad Tariq", "IND_Sardar Bibi": "IND_Sardar Bibi", "IND_Muhammad Arif": "IND_Muhammad Arif", "IND_Sardar Asmat Ullah Khan": "IND_Sardar Asmat Ullah Khan", "IND_Nazar Khan": "IND_Nazar Khan", "IND_Mir Shah Saifal": "IND_Mir Shah Saifal", "IND_Abdul Qasim Shah Khetran": "IND_Abdul Qasim Shah Khetran", "IND_Karamat Ali": "IND_Karamat Ali", "IND_Aurangzeb Khetran": "IND_Aurangzeb Khetran", "IND_Raheem Khan": "IND_Raheem Khan", "IND_Shazia Shah Jahan Khetran": "IND_Shazia Shah Jahan Khetran", "IND_Liaqat Khan": "IND_Liaqat Khan", "IND_Mir Jibran Khan Khetran": "IND_Mir Jibran Khan Khetran", "IND_Muhammad Umar Khan": "IND_Muhammad Umar Khan", "IND_Abdul Ghani Khetran": "IND_Abdul Ghani Khetran", "NP": "NP", "MOTP": "MOTP", "BNP": "BNP", "IND_Abdul Hassan": "IND_Abdul Hassan", "IND_Muhammad Khan": "IND_Muhammad Khan", "IND_Shams Ud Din": "IND_Shams Ud Din", "IND_Shams Ullah": "IND_Shams Ullah", "IND_Abdul Wahid": "IND_Abdul Wahid", "IND_Abdul Haq": "IND_Abdul Haq", "IND_Sikandar Hayat Khan Jogezai": "IND_Sikandar Hayat Khan Jogezai", "IND_Naqeebullah Khan": "IND_Naqeebullah Khan", "IND_Asghar Khan": "IND_Asghar Khan", "IND_Samiullah": "IND_Samiullah", "IND_Shahzad Khan": "IND_Shahzad Khan", "IND_Abdul Salam": "IND_Abdul Salam", "IND_Hayat Khan": "IND_Hayat Khan", "IND_Jalal Ud Din": "IND_Jalal Ud Din", "IND_Akhtar Gul": "IND_Akhtar Gul", "IND_Inayatullah": "IND_Inayatullah", "IND_Hafiz Sanzar Khan": "IND_Hafiz Sanzar Khan", "NDM": "NDM", "MQMP": "MQMP", "IND_Sardar Muhammad Anwar Nasar": "IND_Sardar Muhammad Anwar Nasar", "IND_Azam Khan Tareen": "IND_Azam Khan Tareen", "IND_Muhammad Ashraf": "IND_Muhammad Ashraf", "IND_Muhammad Ashraf Khan": "IND_Muhammad Ashraf Khan", "IND_Safdar Ali Loni": "IND_Safdar Ali Loni", "IND_Jahangir Khan": "IND_Jahangir Khan", "IND_Farooq Ahmed": "IND_Farooq Ahmed", "IND_Dilbar Khan": "IND_Dilbar Khan", "IND_Sardar Khushdil Khan": "IND_Sardar Khushdil Khan", "IND_Aamir Khan": "IND_Aamir Khan", "IND_Abdul Manan": "IND_Abdul Manan", "IND_Parviz Ahmad": "IND_Parviz Ahmad", "IND_Shadi Khan": "IND_Shadi Khan", "IND_Masoom Khan": "IND_Masoom Khan", "IND_Muhammad Javed": "IND_Muhammad Javed", "IND_Gohar Khan Luni": "IND_Gohar Khan Luni", "IND_Sardar Sher Afghan Zarkoon": "IND_Sardar Sher Afghan Zarkoon", "IND_Zia Ullah": "IND_Zia Ullah", "IND_Sarfaraz": "IND_Sarfaraz", "IND_Sardar Muhammad Israr Tareen": "IND_Sardar Muhammad Israr Tareen", "IND_Malak Muhammad Hanif": "IND_Malak Muhammad Hanif", "IND_Zafar Khan": "IND_Zafar Khan", "IND_Sher Afzal Khan": "IND_Sher Afzal Khan", "IND_Umer Waleed": "IND_Umer Waleed", "IND_Allah Dad": "IND_Allah Dad", "IND_Gul Nawaz Khajjak": "IND_Gul Nawaz Khajjak", "IND_Muhammad Anwar": "IND_Muhammad Anwar", "IND_Muhammad Mukhtar Khan Tareen": "IND_Muhammad Mukhtar Khan Tareen", "IND_Ali Jan": "IND_Ali Jan", "QWP": "QWP", "IND_Nawab Khan": "IND_Nawab Khan", "IND_Jan Muhammad": "IND_Jan Muhammad", "IND_Noor Muhammad": "IND_Noor Muhammad", "IND_Naseeb Ullah": "IND_Naseeb Ullah", "IND_Abdul Waheed": "IND_Abdul Waheed", "IND_Sadam Tareen": "IND_Sadam Tareen", "IND_Baz Muhammad S/O Abdullah": "IND_Baz Muhammad S/O Abdullah", "IND_Abdul Baqi Tareen": "IND_Abdul Baqi Tareen", "IND_Muhammad Akbar": "IND_Muhammad Akbar", "IND_Naseeb Ullah Khan": "IND_Naseeb Ullah Khan", "IND_Din Muhammad": "IND_Din Muhammad", "IND_Malak Aziz Ullah": "IND_Malak Aziz Ullah", "IND_Baaz Muhammad S/O Haji Ibrahim": "IND_Baaz Muhammad S/O Haji Ibrahim", "IND_Abdul Malik": "IND_Abdul Malik", "IND_Khudai Dost Kakar": "IND_Khudai Dost Kakar", "IND_Muhammad Yaseen": "IND_Muhammad Yaseen", "IND_Jamal Abdul Nasir": "IND_Jamal Abdul Nasir", "IND_Amo Jan": "IND_Amo Jan", "IND_Akhter Muhammad": "IND_Akhter Muhammad", "JUP-S": "JUP-S", "MJAHP": "MJAHP", "IND_Mir Muhammad Asghar Khan Marri": "IND_Mir Muhammad Asghar Khan Marri", "IND_Mir Sardar Khan Rind": "IND_Mir Sardar Khan Rind", "IND_Zubaida Khatoon": "IND_Zubaida Khatoon", "IND_Arifa Rakhshani": "IND_Arifa Rakhshani", "IND_Muhammad Malook": "IND_Muhammad Malook", "IND_Saeed Ahmad": "IND_Saeed Ahmad", "IND_Ameer Bakhsh Nashad": "IND_Ameer Bakhsh Nashad", "IND_Malik Arif Ali": "IND_Malik Arif Ali", "IND_Naseer Ahmad": "IND_Naseer Ahmad", "IND_Mir Kohyar Khan Domki": "IND_Mir Kohyar Khan Domki", "IND_Riaz Ali Riaz": "IND_Riaz Ali Riaz", "IND_Nawab Jangez Khan Marri": "IND_Nawab Jangez Khan Marri", "IND_Azad Khan": "IND_Azad Khan", "IND_Sardarzada Dinar Domki": "IND_Sardarzada Dinar Domki", "IND_Nawabzada Buzair Marri": "IND_Nawabzada Buzair Marri", "IND_Muhammad Faisal Tariq": "IND_Muhammad Faisal Tariq", "TLP": "TLP", "BNP-A": "BNP-A", "TJP": "TJP", "IND_Nawabzada Gazain Khan Marri": "IND_Nawabzada Gazain Khan Marri", "IND_Mir Liaqat Ali": "IND_Mir Liaqat Ali", "IND_Mir Sherin Khan": "IND_Mir Sherin Khan", "IND_Tanveer Marri": "IND_Tanveer Marri", "IND_Mir Danish Marri": "IND_Mir Danish Marri", "IND_Mir Abdul Nabi Khan": "IND_Mir Abdul Nabi Khan", "IND_Mir Muhammad": "IND_Mir Muhammad", "IND_Shahzain Khan Marri": "IND_Shahzain Khan Marri", "IND_Mir Bijar Khan Marri": "IND_Mir Bijar Khan Marri", "IND_Muhammad Wali (Retired)": "IND_Muhammad Wali (Retired)", "IND_Muhammad Qasim": "IND_Muhammad Qasim", "IND_Sabir Ali": "IND_Sabir Ali", "IND_Mirza Ghalib": "IND_Mirza Ghalib", "IND_Muhammad Jan (Retired)": "IND_Muhammad Jan (Retired)", "IND_Ghazi Khan": "IND_Ghazi Khan", "IND_Muhammad Tahir": "IND_Muhammad Tahir", "IND_Kohda Yar Marri": "IND_Kohda Yar Marri", "IND_Mir Miran Khan": "IND_Mir Miran Khan", "IND_Israr Ullah Zaib": "IND_Israr Ullah Zaib", "BPP": "BPP", "IND_Mir Aftab Ahmad Bugti": "IND_Mir Aftab Ahmad Bugti", "IND_Jalal Ur Rehman": "IND_Jalal Ur Rehman", "IND_Nawabzada Shahzain Bugti": "IND_Nawabzada Shahzain Bugti", "IND_Mir Jan Muhammad Bugti": "IND_Mir Jan Muhammad Bugti", "IND_Soorat Khan": "IND_Soorat Khan", "IND_Mir Chakar Bugti": "IND_Mir Chakar Bugti", "IND_Tariq Hussain": "IND_Tariq Hussain", "IND_Shah Jamal Bugti": "IND_Shah Jamal Bugti", "IND_Mir Liaqat Ali Khan": "IND_Mir Liaqat Ali Khan", "JWP": "JWP", "IND_Abdul Majeed": "IND_Abdul Majeed", "IND_Imdad Hussain": "IND_Imdad Hussain", "IND_Ashiq Hussain": "IND_Ashiq Hussain", "IND_Muhammad Rafique": "IND_Muhammad Rafique", "IND_Syed Walayat Hussain": "IND_Syed Walayat Hussain", "IND_Sikandar Ali": "IND_Sikandar Ali", "IND_Muhammad Zaman": "IND_Muhammad Zaman", "JQM": "JQM", "IND_Sardar Yar Muhammad Rind": "IND_Sardar Yar Muhammad Rind", "IND_Pir Bakhsh Jamot": "IND_Pir Bakhsh Jamot", "IND_Abdul Rasheed": "IND_Abdul Rasheed", "IND_Ghulam Rasool": "IND_Ghulam Rasool", "IND_Sardar Noor Ahmad Bangulzai": "IND_Sardar Noor Ahmad Bangulzai", "IND_Ghulam Farooq": "IND_Ghulam Farooq", "IND_Mir Beer Burg": "IND_Mir Beer Burg", "IND_Khuda Bakhsh": "IND_Khuda Bakhsh", "IND_Mir Farooq Aziz": "IND_Mir Farooq Aziz", "IND_Ghulam Haider": "IND_Ghulam Haider", "IND_Wadera Ameer Bakhsh Lashari": "IND_Wadera Ameer Bakhsh Lashari", "IND_Muhammad Momin Kurd": "IND_Muhammad Momin Kurd", "IND_Mir Ghulam Jan": "IND_Mir Ghulam Jan", "IND_Khan Muhammad": "IND_Khan Muhammad", "IND_Mir Hakim Miran": "IND_Mir Hakim Miran", "IND_Zaheer Ahmed": "IND_Zaheer Ahmed", "PRP": "PRP", "IND_Mir Sikandar Ali": "IND_Mir Sikandar Ali", "IND_Arshad Hussain": "IND_Arshad Hussain", "IND_Qadir Bakhsh": "IND_Qadir Bakhsh", "IND_Ghulam Nabi": "IND_Ghulam Nabi", "IND_Syed Kazim Hussain Shah": "IND_Syed Kazim Hussain Shah", "IND_Wahid Bakhsh": "IND_Wahid Bakhsh", "IND_Safdar Ali": "IND_Safdar Ali", "IND_Shabir Hussain Shah": "IND_Shabir Hussain Shah", "IND_Rehmatullah": "IND_Rehmatullah", "IND_Abdul Majeed Khosa": "IND_Abdul Majeed Khosa", "IND_Majida Abro": "IND_Majida Abro", "IND_Muhammad Bilal Umrani": "IND_Muhammad Bilal Umrani", "IND_Syed Yaqoob Shah": "IND_Syed Yaqoob Shah", "IND_Mir Saifullah Khan Domki": "IND_Mir Saifullah Khan Domki", "IND_Syed Haider Ali Shah": "IND_Syed Haider Ali Shah", "IND_Shah Nawaz": "IND_Shah Nawaz", "IND_Basheer Ahmed": "IND_Basheer Ahmed", "JUP-N": "JUP-N", "PML-Q": "PML-Q", "JUP-IN": "JUP-IN", "IND_Nazeer Ahmed": "IND_Nazeer Ahmed", "IND_Mir Muhammad Amin Umrani": "IND_Mir Muhammad Amin Umrani", "IND_Qurban Ali": "IND_Qurban Ali", "IND_Abdul Rauf": "IND_Abdul Rauf", "IND_Yar Muhammad": "IND_Yar Muhammad", "IND_Salar Aman": "IND_Salar Aman", "IND_Siraj Ali": "IND_Siraj Ali", "IND_Mir Naimatullah Zehri": "IND_Mir Naimatullah Zehri", "IND_Wahid": "IND_Wahid", "IND_Sajid Ali": "IND_Sajid Ali", "IND_Sabir Hussain": "IND_Sabir Hussain", "IND_Saadullah": "IND_Saadullah", "PPP-SB": "PPP-SB", "IND_Mir Iqbal Ahmed Khan Bajrani": "IND_Mir Iqbal Ahmed Khan Bajrani", "IND_Ali Murad": "IND_Ali Murad", "IND_Pervez Ahmad": "IND_Pervez Ahmad", "IND_Shakir Hussain": "IND_Shakir Hussain", "IND_Manzoor Ahmed": "IND_Manzoor Ahmed", "IND_Jaggan Khan": "IND_Jaggan Khan", "IND_Zahoor Ahmed": "IND_Zahoor Ahmed", "IND_Zakir Hussain": "IND_Zakir Hussain", "IND_Faisal Naseeb": "IND_Faisal Naseeb", "IND_Ali Haider": "IND_Ali Haider", "IND_Mir Ghulam Farooq Khan": "IND_Mir Ghulam Farooq Khan", "IND_Meer Umar Khan Jamali": "IND_Meer Umar Khan Jamali", "IND_Abdul Rahman": "IND_Abdul Rahman", "IND_Nasibullah": "IND_Nasibullah", "IND_Nisar Ahmed": "IND_Nisar Ahmed", "IND_Asfand Yar Jamali": "IND_Asfand Yar Jamali", "IND_Arz Muhammad": "IND_Arz Muhammad", "IND_Ameer Reza Jamali": "IND_Ameer Reza Jamali", "IND_Liaqat Ali": "IND_Liaqat Ali", "IND_Muhammad Najeeb": "IND_Muhammad Najeeb", "IND_Mitha Khan": "IND_Mitha Khan", "IND_Zameer Hussain": "IND_Zameer Hussain", "IND_Abdul Rasool": "IND_Abdul Rasool", "IND_Imran Khan": "IND_Imran Khan", "IND_Muhammad Younis": "IND_Muhammad Younis", "IND_Izhar Hussain": "IND_Izhar Hussain", "IND_Shahid Nawaz": "IND_Shahid Nawaz", "IND_Adam Khan": "IND_Adam Khan", "IND_Pervez Ahmed": "IND_Pervez Ahmed", "IND_Mir Mohammad Anwar": "IND_Mir Mohammad Anwar", "IND_Har Byar Jamali": "IND_Har Byar Jamali", "MWM": "MWM", "IND_Zareef Ahmad": "IND_Zareef Ahmad", "IND_Sana Jamali": "IND_Sana Jamali", "IND_Niaz Ahmed Khan": "IND_Niaz Ahmed Khan", "IND_Aamir Ali Khan Jamali": "IND_Aamir Ali Khan Jamali", "IND_Muhammad Raheem": "IND_Muhammad Raheem", "IND_Human Begum": "IND_Human Begum", "IND_Muhammad Asad Jamali": "IND_Muhammad Asad Jamali", "IND_Muhammad Naeem Umrani": "IND_Muhammad Naeem Umrani", "IND_Sardar Muhammad Haroon Jamali": "IND_Sardar Muhammad Haroon Jamali", "IND_Muhammad Siddique": "IND_Muhammad Siddique", "IND_Saleem Akhtar": "IND_Saleem Akhtar", "IND_Mir Godha Khan Hejwani": "IND_Mir Godha Khan Hejwani", "IND_Haider Ali Jamali": "IND_Haider Ali Jamali", "IND_Nawabzada Mir Israrullah Zehri": "IND_Nawabzada Mir Israrullah Zehri", "IND_Sardar Murad Khan": "IND_Sardar Murad Khan", "IND_Abdul Wahab": "IND_Abdul Wahab", "IND_Shafiullah": "IND_Shafiullah", "IND_Mir Zafarullah Khan Zehri": "IND_Mir Zafarullah Khan Zehri", "IND_Aurang Zaib": "IND_Aurang Zaib", "TLI": "TLI", "IND_Mir Muhammad Iqbal": "IND_Mir Muhammad Iqbal", "IND_Aurang Zaib Zehri": "IND_Aurang Zaib Zehri", "IND_Mir Aziz Muhammad": "IND_Mir Aziz Muhammad", "IND_Mir Masood Ahmed": "IND_Mir Masood Ahmed", "IND_Deedag Bizanjo": "IND_Deedag Bizanjo", "IND_Ellahi Bakhsh": "IND_Ellahi Bakhsh", "IND_Mehboob Ali": "IND_Mehboob Ali", "IND_Sardar Abdul Jalil": "IND_Sardar Abdul Jalil", "IND_Muhammad Khalid Bizenjo": "IND_Muhammad Khalid Bizenjo", "IND_Mir Shafiq Ur Rehman Mengal": "IND_Mir Shafiq Ur Rehman Mengal", "IND_Noor Ul Haq Mengal": "IND_Noor Ul Haq Mengal", "IND_Yasir Ahmad": "IND_Yasir Ahmad", "IND_Wazeer Ahmed Noorani": "IND_Wazeer Ahmed Noorani", "IND_Sikandar Khan": "IND_Sikandar Khan", "IND_Ghulam Mustafa Malik": "IND_Ghulam Mustafa Malik", "IND_Gulsher": "IND_Gulsher", "IND_Maria Kamal": "IND_Maria Kamal", "IND_Abdul Jabbar": "IND_Abdul Jabbar", "IND_Muhammad Karim Baloch": "IND_Muhammad Karim Baloch", "IND_Shah Nawaz Hassan": "IND_Shah Nawaz Hassan", "IND_Muhammad Anwar Roonjho": "IND_Muhammad Anwar Roonjho", "IND_Ghulam Ali": "IND_Ghulam Ali", "IND_Um E Safia": "IND_Um E Safia", "IND_Sher Muhammad": "IND_Sher Muhammad", "IND_Abull hassan": "IND_Abull hassan", "IND_Muhammad Akram": "IND_Muhammad Akram", "IND_Syed Moheem Jan": "IND_Syed Moheem Jan", "IND_Niamat Ullah": "IND_Niamat Ullah", "IND_Naveed Jan Baloch": "IND_Naveed Jan Baloch", "IND_Syed Noor Ali Shah": "IND_Syed Noor Ali Shah", "IND_Abdul Majid": "IND_Abdul Majid", "HDTB": "HDTB", "IND_Bibi Malik Naz": "IND_Bibi Malik Naz", "IND_Rehman Bakhsh": "IND_Rehman Bakhsh", "IND_Yaqoob Bizenjo": "IND_Yaqoob Bizenjo", "IND_Noor Jan": "IND_Noor Jan", "IND_Raheem Imam Bakhsh": "IND_Raheem Imam Bakhsh", "PMML": "PMML", "IND_Ayaz Qadir": "IND_Ayaz Qadir", "IND_Muhammad Yaqoob": "IND_Muhammad Yaqoob", "IND_Murad Jan": "IND_Murad Jan", "IND_Syed Taimoor Shah": "IND_Syed Taimoor Shah", "IND_Mir Chakar Piral": "IND_Mir Chakar Piral", "IND_Sadiq Ali": "IND_Sadiq Ali", "IND_Shah Bakhsh Shah": "IND_Shah Bakhsh Shah", "IND_Jameel Ahmad Dashti": "IND_Jameel Ahmad Dashti", "IND_Fida Ahmad": "IND_Fida Ahmad", "IND_Rahima Jalal": "IND_Rahima Jalal", "IND_Niaz Baloch": "IND_Niaz Baloch", "IND_Abdul Jabbar Rind": "IND_Abdul Jabbar Rind", "IND_Rustom Khan Bizenjo": "IND_Rustom Khan Bizenjo", "IND_Zahid": "IND_Zahid", "IND_Mir Zubair Rind": "IND_Mir Zubair Rind", "IND_Malik Shah": "IND_Malik Shah", "IND_Sajjad Ahmed": "IND_Sajjad Ahmed", "IND_Bashir Ahmad": "IND_Bashir Ahmad", "IND_Barkat Ali": "IND_Barkat Ali", "IND_Muhammad Ayub Baloch": "IND_Muhammad Ayub Baloch", "IND_Qamber Askani": "IND_Qamber Askani", "IND_Manzoor Ahmad": "IND_Manzoor Ahmad", "IND_Latifa": "IND_Latifa", "IND_Jasim": "IND_Jasim", "IND_Muhammad Noor": "IND_Muhammad Noor", "IND_Syed Muhammad": "IND_Syed Muhammad", "IND_Aziz Ahmed": "IND_Aziz Ahmed", "IND_Ghulam Yasin": "IND_Ghulam Yasin", "IND_Mir Abdul Malik": "IND_Mir Abdul Malik", "IND_Habib Ullah": "IND_Habib Ullah", "IND_Sardar Syed Fazal Muhammad": "IND_Sardar Syed Fazal Muhammad", "IND_Abdul Waseh": "IND_Abdul Waseh", "IND_Naeem Ullah": "IND_Naeem Ullah", "IND_Atiq ur Rehman Khan Mohammad Hassni": "IND_Atiq ur Rehman Khan Mohammad Hassni", "IND_Saif ur Rehman": "IND_Saif ur Rehman", "IND_Abdul Rab": "IND_Abdul Rab", "IND_Mir Ahmed Nawaz Muhammad Hassni": "IND_Mir Ahmed Nawaz Muhammad Hassni", "IND_Noor Ahmed": "IND_Noor Ahmed", "IND_Muneer Ahmed": "IND_Muneer Ahmed", "IND_Aziz Ahmad Muhammad Hassni": "IND_Aziz Ahmad Muhammad Hassni", "IND_Bisharat Ullah": "IND_Bisharat Ullah", "IND_Nezamuddin Barahuee": "IND_Nezamuddin Barahuee", "IND_Asghar Ali": "IND_Asghar Ali", "IND_Naseer Ahmed": "IND_Naseer Ahmed", "IND_Ejaz Sanjrani": "IND_Ejaz Sanjrani", "IND_Abdul Ghafoor": "IND_Abdul Ghafoor", "IND_Ghulam Dastgeer": "IND_Ghulam Dastgeer", "IND_Ali Ahmed": "IND_Ali Ahmed", "IND_Haji Arz Muhammad Barech": "IND_Haji Arz Muhammad Barech", "IND_Bismillah khan": "IND_Bismillah khan", "IND_Abdul Aziz": "IND_Abdul Aziz", "IND_Sardar Atta Ullah": "IND_Sardar Atta Ullah", "IND_Qadir Bakhsh Muhammad Hassani": "IND_Qadir Bakhsh Muhammad Hassani", "IND_Javed Ahmad": "IND_Javed Ahmad", "IND_Ahmed Nawaz Muhammad Hassni": "IND_Ahmed Nawaz Muhammad Hassni", "IND_Mir Muhammad Jummah Kubdani": "IND_Mir Muhammad Jummah Kubdani", "IND_Muhammad Ibrahim": "IND_Muhammad Ibrahim", "IND_Mir Abdul Noor Muhammad Hassni": "IND_Mir Abdul Noor Muhammad Hassni", "IND_Abdul Kareem Nosherwani": "IND_Abdul Kareem Nosherwani", "IND_Mir Shoukat Ali Mengal": "IND_Mir Shoukat Ali Mengal", "IND_Inayat Ullah": "IND_Inayat Ullah", "IND_Nazeer Ahmad": "IND_Nazeer Ahmad", "IND_Ameen Ullah": "IND_Ameen Ullah", "IND_Mir Muhammad Afzal": "IND_Mir Muhammad Afzal", "IND_Sana Ullah": "IND_Sana Ullah", "IND_Taj Muhammad": "IND_Taj Muhammad", "IND_Jeyand Khan": "IND_Jeyand Khan", "IND_Ameer Muhammad": "IND_Ameer Muhammad", "IND_Muhammad Ishaq": "IND_Muhammad Ishaq", "IND_Atta Ullah": "IND_Atta Ullah", "IND_Asfand Yar": "IND_Asfand Yar", "IND_Mehrab Khan": "IND_Mehrab Khan", "IND_Mir Maqbool Ahmad": "IND_Mir Maqbool Ahmad", "IND_Abdul Samad": "IND_Abdul Samad", "IND_Mohy Uddin": "IND_Mohy Uddin", "IND_Hafiz Abubakar": "IND_Hafiz Abubakar", "IND_Muhammad Iqbal": "IND_Muhammad Iqbal", "IND_Baloch Khan": "IND_Baloch Khan", "IND_Jahanzaib": "IND_Jahanzaib", "IND_Mir Sami Ullah": "IND_Mir Sami Ullah", "IND_Mir Munir Ahmad": "IND_Mir Munir Ahmad", "IND_Abdullah": "IND_Abdullah", "IND_Saddam Hussain": "IND_Saddam Hussain", "IND_Ahmad Nawaz Baloch": "IND_Ahmad Nawaz Baloch", "IND_Sultan Muhammad": "IND_Sultan Muhammad", "IND_Abdul Hameed": "IND_Abdul Hameed", "IND_Muhammad Zakria": "IND_Muhammad Zakria", "IND_Mir Atta Ullah": "IND_Mir Atta Ullah", "IND_Mir Tanveer Ahmed Langove": "IND_Mir Tanveer Ahmed Langove", "IND_Bibi Noor": "IND_Bibi Noor", "IND_Mir Munir Ahmed Shahwani": "IND_Mir Munir Ahmed Shahwani", "IND_Agha Muhammad Akram Ahmedzai": "IND_Agha Muhammad Akram Ahmedzai", "IND_Takari Shafqatullah Langove": "IND_Takari Shafqatullah Langove", "IND_Riaz Ahmed": "IND_Riaz Ahmed", "IND_Zulqarnain": "IND_Zulqarnain", "IND_Muhammad Farhan Sasoli": "IND_Muhammad Farhan Sasoli", "IND_Mir Ahmad Khan Mengal": "IND_Mir Ahmad Khan Mengal", "IND_Lal Jan": "IND_Lal Jan", "IND_Nawab Muhammad Khan Shahwani": "IND_Nawab Muhammad Khan Shahwani", "IND_Abdul Jaleel": "IND_Abdul Jaleel", "IND_Ahmad Khan Sarparah": "IND_Ahmad Khan Sarparah", "IND_Zulekha Aziz": "IND_Zulekha Aziz", "IND_Tariq Aziz": "IND_Tariq Aziz", "IND_Abdul Latif Muhammad Hassni": "IND_Abdul Latif Muhammad Hassni", "IND_Mir Ahmad": "IND_Mir Ahmad", "IND_Mir Hasil Khan": "IND_Mir Hasil Khan", "IND_Saif Ud Din": "IND_Saif Ud Din", "IND_Hazoor Bakhsh": "IND_Hazoor Bakhsh", "IND_Mir Muhammad Akbar Bangalzai": "IND_Mir Muhammad Akbar Bangalzai", "IND_Abdul Hanan": "IND_Abdul Hanan", "IND_Syed Muhammad Siddiq": "IND_Syed Muhammad Siddiq", "IND_Balach Khan": "IND_Balach Khan", "IND_Abdul Waseel": "IND_Abdul Waseel", "IND_Baz Muhammad": "IND_Baz Muhammad", "IND_Gul Muhammad": "IND_Gul Muhammad", "IND_Muhammad Hussain": "IND_Muhammad Hussain", "IND_Rozi Khan Kakar": "IND_Rozi Khan Kakar", "IND_Mehwand Khan": "IND_Mehwand Khan", "IND_Muhammad Shoaib": "IND_Muhammad Shoaib", "IND_Gul Baran": "IND_Gul Baran", "IND_Zubair Ahmad": "IND_Zubair Ahmad", "IND_Simtullah": "IND_Simtullah", "IND_Bakhat Muhammad": "IND_Bakhat Muhammad", "IND_Malik Abdullah Khan": "IND_Malik Abdullah Khan", "IND_Malik Khan Wali Nasar": "IND_Malik Khan Wali Nasar", "IND_Malik Muhammad Faisal Khan": "IND_Malik Muhammad Faisal Khan", "IND_Muhammad Hashim Khan": "IND_Muhammad Hashim Khan", "IND_Muhammad Saleem": "IND_Muhammad Saleem", "IND_Ali Tahir": "IND_Ali Tahir", "IND_Niaz Muhammad": "IND_Niaz Muhammad", "IND_Abdul Ali": "IND_Abdul Ali", "IND_Moin Ullah": "IND_Moin Ullah", "IND_Badin Khan": "IND_Badin Khan", "IND_Prince Faisal Dawood": "IND_Prince Faisal Dawood", "IND_Abdul Hadi": "IND_Abdul Hadi", "IND_Alamgir Khan Kakar": "IND_Alamgir Khan Kakar", "IND_Malik Naseeb Ullah": "IND_Malik Naseeb Ullah", "IND_Atif Ullah": "IND_Atif Ullah", "IND_Saif Ullah Khan": "IND_Saif Ullah Khan", "IND_Syed Hafeez Ullah": "IND_Syed Hafeez Ullah", "IND_Wazir Khan": "IND_Wazir Khan", "IND_Naqash Bhatti": "IND_Naqash Bhatti", "PNP": "PNP", "TTP": "TTP", "IND_Dawood Shah": "IND_Dawood Shah", "IND_Muhammad Asif": "IND_Muhammad Asif", "IND_Nawab Zafarullah Khan Shahwani": "IND_Nawab Zafarullah Khan Shahwani", "IND_Khadim Hussain Hazara": "IND_Khadim Hussain Hazara", "IND_Jaffar Ali": "IND_Jaffar Ali", "IND_Akbar Khan": "IND_Akbar Khan", "IND_Hameed Ullah": "IND_Hameed Ullah", "IND_Hafiz Naik Muhammad": "IND_Hafiz Naik Muhammad", "IND_Saleh Muhammad": "IND_Saleh Muhammad", "IND_Hasib Akram": "IND_Hasib Akram", "IND_Khadim Hussain Hazra": "IND_Khadim Hussain Hazra", "IND_Nazia Aslam": "IND_Nazia Aslam", "IND_Muhammad Jaffar": "IND_Muhammad Jaffar", "IND_Asmat Khan": "IND_Asmat Khan", "IND_Zulfiqar Ali Khan": "IND_Zulfiqar Ali Khan", "IND_Talib Hussain": "IND_Talib Hussain", "IND_Manzoor Hussain": "IND_Manzoor Hussain", "IND_Syed Mehmood Shah": "IND_Syed Mehmood Shah", "IND_Asmatullah": "IND_Asmatullah", "IND_Ali Hassan": "IND_Ali Hassan", "IND_Muhammad Hadi": "IND_Muhammad Hadi", "IND_Malik Nazar Khan Zadran": "IND_Malik Nazar Khan Zadran", "HDP": "HDP", "IND_Wali Muhammad": "IND_Wali Muhammad", "IND_Abdul Ghaffar Khan Kakar": "IND_Abdul Ghaffar Khan Kakar", "IND_Syed Abdul Sadiq": "IND_Syed Abdul Sadiq", "IND_Allah Daad": "IND_Allah Daad", "IND_Nizam ud Din": "IND_Nizam ud Din", "IND_Mirwiais": "IND_Mirwiais", "IND_Nida Muhammad": "IND_Nida Muhammad", "IND_Izat Ullah": "IND_Izat Ullah", "IND_Muhammad Tahir Khan": "IND_Muhammad Tahir Khan", "IND_Muhammad Hayat": "IND_Muhammad Hayat", "IND_Ameer Hamza": "IND_Ameer Hamza", "IND_Sardar Muhammad": "IND_Sardar Muhammad", "IND_Zain Ul Abidin Khan": "IND_Zain Ul Abidin Khan", "IND_Hazrat Khan": "IND_Hazrat Khan", "IND_Ahsam Uddin": "IND_Ahsam Uddin", "IND_Syed Meer Ali": "IND_Syed Meer Ali", "IND_Rozi Khan": "IND_Rozi Khan", "IND_Mohib Ullah Khan Durrani": "IND_Mohib Ullah Khan Durrani", "IND_Bismillah Khan": "IND_Bismillah Khan", "IND_Haibat Khan": "IND_Haibat Khan", "IND_Abdul Samad Khan": "IND_Abdul Samad Khan", "IND_Muhammad Hassan": "IND_Muhammad Hassan", "IND_Muhammad Usman": "IND_Muhammad Usman", "IND_Muhammad Alam": "IND_Muhammad Alam", "IND_Muhammad Jahangir": "IND_Muhammad Jahangir", "IND_Muhammad Naseem": "IND_Muhammad Naseem", "IND_Imran Hussain": "IND_Imran Hussain", "IND_Tahir Mehmood Khan": "IND_Tahir Mehmood Khan", "IND_Mudisar Sadiq": "IND_Mudisar Sadiq", "IND_Muhammad Imran": "IND_Muhammad Imran", "IND_Muhammad Hussain Khawari": "IND_Muhammad Hussain Khawari", "IND_Raza Ur Rehman": "IND_Raza Ur Rehman", "IND_Muhammad Aslam": "IND_Muhammad Aslam", "IND_Mudassar Ahmed Khan": "IND_Mudassar Ahmed Khan", "IND_Yasir Bashir": "IND_Yasir Bashir", "IND_Abdul Azim": "IND_Abdul Azim", "IND_Ali Yawar": "IND_Ali Yawar", "IND_Syed Raza": "IND_Syed Raza", "IND_Sardar Khadim Hussain Warduk": "IND_Sardar Khadim Hussain Warduk", "IND_Syedaal Khan": "IND_Syedaal Khan", "IND_Asif Masih": "IND_Asif Masih", "IND_Shoaib Nisar": "IND_Shoaib Nisar", "IND_Arbab Liaqat Ali": "IND_Arbab Liaqat Ali", "IND_Luqman Masud": "IND_Luqman Masud", "IND_Bilal Ahmed Khan": "IND_Bilal Ahmed Khan", "IND_Muhammad Rahim": "IND_Muhammad Rahim", "IND_Kaleemullah": "IND_Kaleemullah", "IND_Rizwan Uddin": "IND_Rizwan Uddin", "IND_Niamat Ullah Khan": "IND_Niamat Ullah Khan", "IND_Sher Ali": "IND_Sher Ali", "IND_Muhammad Zubair": "IND_Muhammad Zubair", "IND_Jumma Khan": "IND_Jumma Khan", "IND_Iqbal Ud Din": "IND_Iqbal Ud Din", "IND_Syed Jamil Ahmed": "IND_Syed Jamil Ahmed", "IND_Mahmood Khan": "IND_Mahmood Khan", "IND_Muhammad Younas": "IND_Muhammad Younas", "IND_Dost Muhammad": "IND_Dost Muhammad", "IND_Nawabzada Sharif Jogezai": "IND_Nawabzada Sharif Jogezai", "IND_Malik Zeeshan Hussain": "IND_Malik Zeeshan Hussain", "IND_Eid Muhammad": "IND_Eid Muhammad", "IND_Umer Khan Achakzai": "IND_Umer Khan Achakzai", "IND_Samit Khan": "IND_Samit Khan", "IND_Naveed Khan": "IND_Naveed Khan", "IND_Kamran Hussain": "IND_Kamran Hussain", "IND_Jamil Ahmed": "IND_Jamil Ahmed", "IND_Naeem Kareem": "IND_Naeem Kareem", "ITP": "ITP", "IND_Sardar Douda Khan": "IND_Sardar Douda Khan", "IND_Sheryar Khan": "IND_Sheryar Khan", "IND_Muhammad Ismail": "IND_Muhammad Ismail", "IND_Malik Muhammad Naeem Khan Bazai": "IND_Malik Muhammad Naeem Khan Bazai", "IND_Javed Ahmed Khan": "IND_Javed Ahmed Khan", "IND_Muhammad Asghar": "IND_Muhammad Asghar", "IND_Muhammad Idrees": "IND_Muhammad Idrees", "IND_Khan Daulat Khan": "IND_Khan Daulat Khan", "IND_Abdul Bari": "IND_Abdul Bari", "IND_Muhib Ullah": "IND_Muhib Ullah", "IND_Mir Tanveer Ahmad": "IND_Mir Tanveer Ahmad", "IND_Sana Wali Muhammad": "IND_Sana Wali Muhammad", "IND_Jahangir Ahmed": "IND_Jahangir Ahmed", "IND_Nawabzada Yadgar Raisani": "IND_Nawabzada Yadgar Raisani", "IND_Abdul saboor Khan": "IND_Abdul saboor Khan", "IND_Yasir Nazir": "IND_Yasir Nazir", "IND_Naeem Karim": "IND_Naeem Karim", "IND_Muhammad Ali": "IND_Muhammad Ali", "IND_Munawara Bibi Balouch": "IND_Munawara Bibi Balouch", "IND_Safia Shafqat": "IND_Safia Shafqat", "IND_Malik Muhammad Faisal Dehwar": "IND_Malik Muhammad Faisal Dehwar", "IND_Abdul Nasir Baloch": "IND_Abdul Nasir Baloch", "IND_Arbab Asif Nawaz Kasi": "IND_Arbab Asif Nawaz Kasi", "IND_Syed Abdullah Shah": "IND_Syed Abdullah Shah", "IND_Hayat Ullah": "IND_Hayat Ullah", "IND_Sadam": "IND_Sadam", "IND_Abdul Jabbar Khan": "IND_Abdul Jabbar Khan", "IND_Muhammad Ali Mahir": "IND_Muhammad Ali Mahir", "IND_Mir Tanveer Ahmed": "IND_Mir Tanveer Ahmed", "IND_Liaquat": "IND_Liaquat", "IND_Moosa Khan": "IND_Moosa Khan", "IND_Muhammad Qasim Pirkani": "IND_Muhammad Qasim Pirkani", "IND_Mir Humayun Aziz Kurd": "IND_Mir Humayun Aziz Kurd", "IND_Daro Khan": "IND_Daro Khan", "IND_Abdul Baseer": "IND_Abdul Baseer", "IND_Zia Ud Din": "IND_Zia Ud Din", "IND_Sardar Abdul Razzaq Satoryani": "IND_Sardar Abdul Razzaq Satoryani", "IND_Aman Ullah": "IND_Aman Ullah", "IND_Shams Ur Rehman": "IND_Shams Ur Rehman", "IND_Nazar Muhammad": "IND_Nazar Muhammad", "IND_Bangul Khan": "IND_Bangul Khan", "IND_Fazal Muhammad": "IND_Fazal Muhammad", "IND_Gul Shah": "IND_Gul Shah", "IND_Pasund Khan": "IND_Pasund Khan", "IND_Mir Nasir Ali Rind": "IND_Mir Nasir Ali Rind", "IND_Mir Muhammad Ullah": "IND_Mir Muhammad Ullah", "IND_Malik Faisal Jan": "IND_Malik Faisal Jan", "IND_Adil Imran": "IND_Adil Imran", "IND_Rameen Rustam": "IND_Rameen Rustam", "IND_Saeed Ahmed": "IND_Saeed Ahmed", "IND_Hidayat Ullah": "IND_Hidayat Ullah", "IND_Mir Naqeeb Ullah Shahwani": "IND_Mir Naqeeb Ullah Shahwani", "IND_Abdul Ghaffar": "IND_Abdul Ghaffar", "IND_Lashkar Khan": "IND_Lashkar Khan", "IND_Muhammad Nadeem Sabir": "IND_Muhammad Nadeem Sabir", "IND_Mir Bashir Ahmed": "IND_Mir Bashir Ahmed", "IND_Akhtar Rehman Shahwani": "IND_Akhtar Rehman Shahwani", "IND_MIr Naseeb Ullah Shahwani": "IND_MIr Naseeb Ullah Shahwani", "IND_Asfand Yar Khan Kakar": "IND_Asfand Yar Khan Kakar", "IND_Sultan Muhammad Khan": "IND_Sultan Muhammad Khan", "IND_Syed Khaliq Dad Shah": "IND_Syed Khaliq Dad Shah", "IND_Muhammad Bilal Khan": "IND_Muhammad Bilal Khan", "IND_Ahmad Yar Khan Kakar": "IND_Ahmad Yar Khan Kakar", "IND_Najeeb Ullah": "IND_Najeeb Ullah", "IND_Zain Ullah": "IND_Zain Ullah", "IND_Nasrullah": "IND_Nasrullah", "IND_Sobat Khan": "IND_Sobat Khan", "IND_Sher Zaman": "IND_Sher Zaman", "IND_Zaheer Khan": "IND_Zaheer Khan", "IND_Syed Shah Nawaz Kiral": "IND_Syed Shah Nawaz Kiral", "IND_Tariq Ahmed Khan": "IND_Tariq Ahmed Khan", "IND_Safar Muhammad Khan": "IND_Safar Muhammad Khan", "IND_Malak Amin Ullah": "IND_Malak Amin Ullah", "IND_Syed Anees ur Rehman": "IND_Syed Anees ur Rehman", "IND_Syed Fazal Muhammad Agha": "IND_Syed Fazal Muhammad Agha", "IND_Ahmed Yar Khan Kakar": "IND_Ahmed Yar Khan Kakar", "IND_Malak Taj Muhammad Kakar": "IND_Malak Taj Muhammad Kakar", "IND_Daulat Shah": "IND_Daulat Shah", "IND_Bibi Zarlashta": "IND_Bibi Zarlashta", "IND_Syed Abdul Hai": "IND_Syed Abdul Hai", "IND_Syed Abdul Baseer": "IND_Syed Abdul Baseer", "IND_Syed Abdul Jalil Bacha": "IND_Syed Abdul Jalil Bacha", "IND_Syed Rafi Ullah": "IND_Syed Rafi Ullah", "IND_Syed Sana Ullah": "IND_Syed Sana Ullah", "IND_Atta Ullah Khan": "IND_Atta Ullah Khan", "IND_Syed Aftab Ahmed": "IND_Syed Aftab Ahmed", "IND_Zakir Ullah Khan Tareen": "IND_Zakir Ullah Khan Tareen", "IND_Muhammad Afzal": "IND_Muhammad Afzal", "IND_Muhammad Zaman Khan": "IND_Muhammad Zaman Khan", "IND_Muhammad Zakaria Khan Kakar": "IND_Muhammad Zakaria Khan Kakar", "IND_Syed Allah Noor": "IND_Syed Allah Noor", "IND_Muhammad Sadiq": "IND_Muhammad Sadiq", "IND_Malik Asmatullah Khan Kakar": "IND_Malik Asmatullah Khan Kakar", "IND_Qiamuddin": "IND_Qiamuddin", "IND_Sadique Khan Tareen": "IND_Sadique Khan Tareen", "IND_Pashtoon Yar": "IND_Pashtoon Yar", "IND_Muhammad Saddique": "IND_Muhammad Saddique", "IND_Abdul Khaliq Khan": "IND_Abdul Khaliq Khan", "IND_Naseebullah": "IND_Naseebullah", "IND_Munawar Khan": "IND_Munawar Khan", "IND_Dad Muhammad": "IND_Dad Muhammad", "IND_Asmat Ullah": "IND_Asmat Ullah", "IND_Ghulam Jeelani": "IND_Ghulam Jeelani", "IND_Salahuddin Khan": "IND_Salahuddin Khan", "IND_Naimatullah": "IND_Naimatullah", "IND_Hussain Ahmad": "IND_Hussain Ahmad", "IND_Lala Jan": "IND_Lala Jan", "IND_Muhammad Ramzan": "IND_Muhammad Ramzan", "IND_Nasrrllah": "IND_Nasrrllah", "IND_Murad Khan": "IND_Murad Khan"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 51, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 51, "registered_not_positive": 51}, "n_stations_flagged": 51, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:31:51.833249", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.168, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.339, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.313, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.193, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.168, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.339, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.631, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.436, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.109, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.462, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.223, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.406, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.313, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.313, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.193, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.114, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.586, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.586, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.818, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.559, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 51}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "138e9703b9ff4a3d83900ed4a4780814", "name": "Timor-Leste 2023 parliamentary (overnight timor_leste_2023_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Timor-Leste", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.cne.tl/ap2023/telaNasional", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PDN": "PDN", "PLPA": "PLPA", "PLP": "PLP", "PD": "PD", "KHUNTO": "KHUNTO", "PVT": "PVT", "UDT": "UDT", "PUDD": "PUDD", "PR": "PR", "UNDERTIM": "UNDERTIM", "FRETILIN": "FRETILIN", "CNRT": "CNRT", "CASDT": "CASDT", "MLPM": "MLPM", "PST": "PST", "PDC": "PDC", "APMT": "APMT"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:31:47.529065", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.758, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.875, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.714, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.526, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.758, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.458, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.802, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.651, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.663, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.483, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.526, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.526, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.457, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.673, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.673, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.221, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.221, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 19}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "08270e82faf04f32af157943a93c7a39", "name": "India 2007 parliamentary (state legislative assembly / vidhan sabha) (overnight india_uttar_pradesh_2007_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Uttar_Pradesh/Uttar_Pradesh_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ABHM": "ABHM", "ABJS": "ABJS", "ABJSP": "ABJSP", "ABLTC": "ABLTC", "ABLTP": "ABLTP", "ABRS": "ABRS", "AD": "AD", "AHRBP": "AHRBP", "AIFB": "AIFB", "AIFB(S)": "AIFB(S)", "AIMF": "AIMF", "ALD": "ALD", "AMKD": "AMKD", "ANC": "ANC", "AP": "AP", "APP": "APP", "ASP": "ASP", "ASPI": "ASPI", "BEP": "BEP", "BGD": "BGD", "BJBCD": "BJBCD", "BJP": "BJP", "BJS": "BJS", "BJSH": "BJSH", "BKD": "BKD", "BKPP": "BKPP", "BKRP": "BKRP", "BND": "BND", "BNRP": "BNRP", "BP": "BP", "BPD": "BPD", "BRKD": "BRKD", "BRPP": "BRPP", "BRVP": "BRVP", "BSA": "BSA", "BSD": "BSD", "BSK": "BSK", "BSKP": "BSKP", "BSP": "BSP", "BSS": "BSS", "BUM": "BUM", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "CPM": "CPM", "DND": "DND", "EKD(UP)": "EKD(UP)", "FB(S)": "FB(S)", "GGP": "GGP", "HKMP": "HKMP", "IBSP": "IBSP", "IEMC": "IEMC", "IJP": "IJP", "INC": "INC", "IND": "IND", "INL": "INL", "IPH": "IPH", "IPI": "IPI", "JD(S)": "JD(S)", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "JHM": "JHM", "JJJKMC": "JJJKMC", "JKM": "JKM", "JM": "JM", "JPS": "JPS", "JSBSP": "JSBSP", "JSP": "JSP", "JVD": "JVD", "KSD": "KSD", "KVMP": "KVMP", "LD": "LD", "LJP": "LJP", "LKPT": "LKPT", "LPI(V)": "LPI(V)", "LPSP": "LPSP", "LSWP": "LSWP", "LTJF": "LTJF", "MC": "MC", "MMUP": "MMUP", "MNVP": "MNVP", "MOP": "MOP", "MUL": "MUL", "NBNP": "NBNP", "NCP": "NCP", "NLHP": "NLHP", "NLP": "NLP", "NNP": "NNP", "PDFO": "PDFO", "PHSP": "PHSP", "PLED": "PLED", "PMSP": "PMSP", "PPI": "PPI", "PSJP": "PSJP", "PTSS": "PTSS", "PVP": "PVP", "RCP": "RCP", "RDMP": "RDMP", "RJAP": "RJAP", "RJD": "RJD", "RJSA": "RJSA", "RKD": "RKD", "RKSP": "RKSP", "RLD": "RLD", "RMEP": "RMEP", "RPD": "RPD", "RPI": "RPI", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "RSAD": "RSAD", "RSBP": "RSBP", "RSMD": "RSMD", "RSP": "RSP", "RTKP": "RTKP", "RWSP": "RWSP", "SAP": "SAP", "SBSP": "SBSP", "SHS": "SHS", "SJP(R)": "SJP(R)", "SP": "SP", "SPSP": "SPSP", "SSAD": "SSAD", "SSD": "SSD", "SSVP": "SSVP", "SVRP": "SVRP", "SWJP": "SWJP", "THPI": "THPI", "UCP": "UCP", "UCPI": "UCPI", "UDP": "UDP", "UPRP": "UPRP", "UPUDF": "UPUDF", "VAJP": "VAJP", "VP": "VP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 403, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 403, "registered_not_positive": 403}, "n_stations_flagged": 403, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:16:55.421392", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.768, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.854, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.721, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.569, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.111, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 403}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6bec5ab1162d49abac31c59a7f25a2d9", "name": "Bangladesh 2024 parliamentary (overnight bangladesh_2024_js.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bangladesh", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ecs.gov.bd/page/result-for-12th-national-parliament-election", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"seat_no": "seat_no", "Awami_League_boat": "Awami_League_boat", "BJC_rocket": "BJC_rocket", "BJP_banyan": "BJP_banyan", "BJSD_gamcha": "BJSD_gamcha", "BKA_chair": "BKA_chair", "BKP_bicycle": "BKP_bicycle", "BMJP_flower_garland": "BMJP_flower_garland", "BMJP_jackfruit": "BMJP_jackfruit", "BNAP_rose": "BNAP_rose", "BNF_dheki": "BNF_dheki", "BNM_anchor": "BNM_anchor", "BSP_banana": "BSP_banana", "BSP_green_coconut": "BSP_green_coconut", "BSP_mathal": "BSP_mathal", "BSSD_television": "BSSD_television", "BTF_ektara": "BTF_ektara", "Bangladesh_Congress_dove": "Bangladesh_Congress_dove", "Bangladesh_Jatiya_Party_golden_fibre": "Bangladesh_Jatiya_Party_golden_fibre", "CPB_hammer": "CPB_hammer", "Gano_Front_fish": "Gano_Front_fish", "Gonotantri_hut": "Gonotantri_hut", "IOJ_minar": "IOJ_minar", "Independent_cauliflower": "Independent_cauliflower", "Independent_eagle": "Independent_eagle", "Independent_kettle": "Independent_kettle", "Independent_scissors": "Independent_scissors", "Independent_truck": "Independent_truck", "JASAD_torch": "JASAD_torch", "JSD_rising_sun": "JSD_rising_sun", "Jatiya_Party_plough": "Jatiya_Party_plough", "Kalyan_Party_kula": "Kalyan_Party_kula", "Muslim_League_stool": "Muslim_League_stool", "NPP_mango": "NPP_mango", "Sammilita_hand": "Sammilita_hand", "Tariqat_candle": "Tariqat_candle", "Trinamool_BNP_chhori": "Trinamool_BNP_chhori", "Zaker_Party_wristwatch": "Zaker_Party_wristwatch", "almirah": "almirah", "balloon": "balloon", "bench": "bench", "building": "building", "charger_light": "charger_light", "cradle": "cradle", "flute": "flute", "fridge": "fridge", "sofa": "sofa", "tabla": "tabla", "watermelon": "watermelon", "wheel_chaka": "wheel_chaka"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 299, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:16:53.131585", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.87, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.571, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.225, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.097, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.217, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.393, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.527, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.382, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.179, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.045, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.547, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.137, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.17, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.565, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.225, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.225, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.097, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.097, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.114, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.56, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.309, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.309, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.444, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.444, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 299}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ca250af066024de6aa6a82925220e930", "name": "Pakistan 2024 parliamentary (overnight pakistan_2024_punjab_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpakistani.com/ge2024/pp/index.html", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AATP": "AATP", "AML": "AML", "ATP": "ATP", "BPP": "BPP", "IPP": "IPP", "ITP": "ITP", "Independent": "Independent", "JIP": "JIP", "JUI-F": "JUI-F", "JUI-N": "JUI-N", "JUP-IN": "JUP-IN", "JUP-N": "JUP-N", "JWP": "JWP", "KI": "KI", "MP": "MP", "MQM-P": "MQM-P", "MWM": "MWM", "NP": "NP", "PAT": "PAT", "PFP": "PFP", "PKI-CA": "PKI-CA", "PML": "PML", "PML-N": "PML-N", "PML-Q": "PML-Q", "PML-Z": "PML-Z", "PMML": "PMML", "PNP": "PNP", "PPP": "PPP", "PPP-SB": "PPP-SB", "PRP": "PRP", "PSP-T": "PSP-T", "PTI-N": "PTI-N", "PTI-P": "PTI-P", "SDP": "SDP", "TJP": "TJP", "TLI": "TLI", "TLP": "TLP", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 297, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 297, "cast_gt_registered": 297}, "n_stations_flagged": 297, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:16:51.118064", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.168, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.339, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.313, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.193, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.168, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.339, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.631, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.436, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.109, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.462, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.223, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.406, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.313, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.313, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.193, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.114, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.586, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.586, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.818, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.559, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 297}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0c670be347e74b5384035831c836b871", "name": "Pakistan 2024 parliamentary (overnight pakistan_2024_na_general.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionpakistani.com/ge2024/result.html", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AJPP": "AJPP", "ANP": "ANP", "ATP": "ATP", "BAP": "BAP", "BNP": "BNP", "BNP-A": "BNP-A", "BPP": "BPP", "GDA": "GDA", "HQMP": "HQMP", "IPP": "IPP", "Independent": "Independent", "JIP": "JIP", "JUI-F": "JUI-F", "JUI-N": "JUI-N", "JUI-S": "JUI-S", "JUP-IN": "JUP-IN", "JUP-N": "JUP-N", "JWP": "JWP", "MJAH": "MJAH", "MOTP": "MOTP", "MQM": "MQM", "MQM-H": "MQM-H", "MQM-P": "MQM-P", "MWM": "MWM", "NDM": "NDM", "NP": "NP", "PAAM": "PAAM", "PAL": "PAL", "PAT": "PAT", "PCP": "PCP", "PDQM": "PDQM", "PFP": "PFP", "PIRP": "PIRP", "PKMAP": "PKMAP", "PMA": "PMA", "PML-KQK": "PML-KQK", "PML-N": "PML-N", "PML-Q": "PML-Q", "PML-Z": "PML-Z", "PMML": "PMML", "PNAP": "PNAP", "PNP": "PNP", "PPP": "PPP", "PPP-SB": "PPP-SB", "PRP": "PRP", "PTE": "PTE", "PTI-N": "PTI-N", "PTI-P": "PTI-P", "QWP": "QWP", "RJUI": "RJUI", "SDP": "SDP", "SKQM": "SKQM", "TDP": "TDP", "TJP": "TJP", "TLI": "TLI", "TLP": "TLP", "TTP": "TTP", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 264, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:16:49.262346", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.168, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.339, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.313, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.193, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.168, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.339, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.631, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.436, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.109, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.462, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.223, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.406, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.313, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.313, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.193, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.114, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.586, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.586, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.818, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.559, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 264}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "edb9dc28e3b141c6b5284278ffa686cd", "name": "India 2008 state assembly election (vidhan sabha) (overnight india_karnataka_2008_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2008, "election_type": "other", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Karnataka/Karnataka_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ABHM": "ABHM", "ABMSD": "ABMSD", "ADMK": "ADMK", "AIFB": "AIFB", "ANC": "ANC", "BJP": "BJP", "BPJP": "BPJP", "BSP": "BSP", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "CPM": "CPM", "IJP": "IJP", "INC": "INC", "IND_1": "IND_1", "IND_10": "IND_10", "IND_11": "IND_11", "IND_12": "IND_12", "IND_13": "IND_13", "IND_14": "IND_14", "IND_15": "IND_15", "IND_16": "IND_16", "IND_17": "IND_17", "IND_18": "IND_18", "IND_19": "IND_19", "IND_2": "IND_2", "IND_20": "IND_20", "IND_21": "IND_21", "IND_22": "IND_22", "IND_23": "IND_23", "IND_24": "IND_24", "IND_25": "IND_25", "IND_3": "IND_3", "IND_4": "IND_4", "IND_5": "IND_5", "IND_6": "IND_6", "IND_7": "IND_7", "IND_8": "IND_8", "IND_9": "IND_9", "INL": "INL", "IUML": "IUML", "JD(S)": "JD(S)", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "KCVP": "KCVP", "KP": "KP", "LJP": "LJP", "LKPT": "LKPT", "NDEP": "NDEP", "RAHS": "RAHS", "RPI": "RPI", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "SHS": "SHS", "SKP": "SKP", "SP": "SP", "SUP": "SUP", "SVP": "SVP", "TSNRP": "TSNRP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 224, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 224, "registered_not_positive": 224}, "n_stations_flagged": 224, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:16:46.861856", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.768, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.854, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.721, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.569, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.111, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 224}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0fa5e25a8f7b48f4b25395dbe58d7e74", "name": "India 2007 local (overnight india_gujarat_2007_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2007, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Gujarat/Gujarat_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ABCD(A)": "ABCD(A)", "ABHM": "ABHM", "ABJS": "ABJS", "ABMSD": "ABMSD", "ABRRP (P)": "ABRRP (P)", "ABRRP( P )": "ABRRP( P )", "ABRRP(P )": "ABRRP(P )", "ADSP": "ADSP", "APP": "APP", "BJNKP": "BJNKP", "BJP": "BJP", "BJSH": "BJSH", "BSP": "BSP", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI(ML)( L)": "CPI(ML)( L)", "CPM": "CPM", "GGP": "GGP", "GYVP": "GYVP", "IJP": "IJP", "INC": "INC", "Independent_ABDASA_1": "Independent_ABDASA_1", "Independent_ABDASA_2": "Independent_ABDASA_2", "Independent_AMRELI_1": "Independent_AMRELI_1", "Independent_AMRELI_2": "Independent_AMRELI_2", "Independent_ANAND_1": "Independent_ANAND_1", "Independent_ANAND_2": "Independent_ANAND_2", "Independent_ANAND_3": "Independent_ANAND_3", "Independent_ANAND_4": "Independent_ANAND_4", "Independent_ANJAR_1": "Independent_ANJAR_1", "Independent_ANJAR_2": "Independent_ANJAR_2", "Independent_ANJAR_3": "Independent_ANJAR_3", "Independent_ANJAR_4": "Independent_ANJAR_4", "Independent_ANJAR_5": "Independent_ANJAR_5", "Independent_ANJAR_6": "Independent_ANJAR_6", "Independent_ANJAR_7": "Independent_ANJAR_7", "Independent_ANKLESHWAR_1": "Independent_ANKLESHWAR_1", "Independent_ANKLESHWAR_2": "Independent_ANKLESHWAR_2", "Independent_ASARWA_1": "Independent_ASARWA_1", "Independent_ASARWA_2": "Independent_ASARWA_2", "Independent_ASARWA_3": "Independent_ASARWA_3", "Independent_ASARWA_4": "Independent_ASARWA_4", "Independent_ASARWA_5": "Independent_ASARWA_5", "Independent_ASARWA_6": "Independent_ASARWA_6", "Independent_BABRA_1": "Independent_BABRA_1", "Independent_BABRA_2": "Independent_BABRA_2", "Independent_BALASINOR_1": "Independent_BALASINOR_1", "Independent_BARDOLI_1": "Independent_BARDOLI_1", "Independent_BARODA_CITY_1": "Independent_BARODA_CITY_1", "Independent_BARODA_CITY_2": "Independent_BARODA_CITY_2", "Independent_BARODA_RURAL_1": "Independent_BARODA_RURAL_1", "Independent_BAYAD_1": "Independent_BAYAD_1", "Independent_BAYAD_2": "Independent_BAYAD_2", "Independent_BAYAD_3": "Independent_BAYAD_3", "Independent_BHADRAN_1": "Independent_BHADRAN_1", "Independent_BHADRAN_2": "Independent_BHADRAN_2", "Independent_BHANVAD_1": "Independent_BHANVAD_1", "Independent_BHANVAD_2": "Independent_BHANVAD_2", "Independent_BHANVAD_3": "Independent_BHANVAD_3", "Independent_BHANVAD_4": "Independent_BHANVAD_4", "Independent_BHANVAD_5": "Independent_BHANVAD_5", "Independent_BHANVAD_6": "Independent_BHANVAD_6", "Independent_BHANVAD_7": "Independent_BHANVAD_7", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_NORTH_1": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_NORTH_1", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_NORTH_2": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_NORTH_2", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_SOUTH_1": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_SOUTH_1", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_SOUTH_2": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_SOUTH_2", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_SOUTH_3": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_SOUTH_3", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_SOUTH_4": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_SOUTH_4", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_SOUTH_5": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_SOUTH_5", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_SOUTH_6": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_SOUTH_6", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_SOUTH_7": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_SOUTH_7", "Independent_BHILODA_1": "Independent_BHILODA_1", "Independent_BHILODA_2": "Independent_BHILODA_2", "Independent_BHILODA_3": "Independent_BHILODA_3", "Independent_BHILODA_4": "Independent_BHILODA_4", "Independent_BHILODA_5": "Independent_BHILODA_5", "Independent_BHILODA_6": "Independent_BHILODA_6", "Independent_BHUJ_1": "Independent_BHUJ_1", "Independent_BHUJ_2": "Independent_BHUJ_2", "Independent_BHUJ_3": "Independent_BHUJ_3", "Independent_BHUJ_4": "Independent_BHUJ_4", "Independent_BHUJ_5": "Independent_BHUJ_5", "Independent_BORSAD_1": "Independent_BORSAD_1", "Independent_BOTAD_1": "Independent_BOTAD_1", "Independent_BOTAD_2": "Independent_BOTAD_2", "Independent_BOTAD_3": "Independent_BOTAD_3", "Independent_BOTAD_4": "Independent_BOTAD_4", "Independent_BOTAD_5": "Independent_BOTAD_5", "Independent_BOTAD_6": "Independent_BOTAD_6", "Independent_BOTAD_7": "Independent_BOTAD_7", "Independent_BOTAD_8": "Independent_BOTAD_8", "Independent_BROACH_1": "Independent_BROACH_1", "Independent_BROACH_2": "Independent_BROACH_2", "Independent_BROACH_3": "Independent_BROACH_3", "Independent_BROACH_4": "Independent_BROACH_4", "Independent_BROACH_5": "Independent_BROACH_5", "Independent_CAMBAY_1": "Independent_CAMBAY_1", "Independent_CHANASMA_1": "Independent_CHANASMA_1", "Independent_CHANASMA_2": "Independent_CHANASMA_2", "Independent_CHANASMA_3": "Independent_CHANASMA_3", "Independent_CHANASMA_4": "Independent_CHANASMA_4", "Independent_CHHOTA_UDAIPUR_1": "Independent_CHHOTA_UDAIPUR_1", "Independent_CHIKHLI_1": "Independent_CHIKHLI_1", "Independent_CHORASI_1": "Independent_CHORASI_1", "Independent_CHORASI_2": "Independent_CHORASI_2", "Independent_CHORASI_3": "Independent_CHORASI_3", "Independent_CHORASI_4": "Independent_CHORASI_4", "Independent_CHORASI_5": "Independent_CHORASI_5", "Independent_CHORASI_6": "Independent_CHORASI_6", "Independent_CHOTILA_1": "Independent_CHOTILA_1", "Independent_CHOTILA_2": "Independent_CHOTILA_2", "Independent_CHOTILA_3": "Independent_CHOTILA_3", "Independent_DABHOI_1": "Independent_DABHOI_1", "Independent_DABHOI_2": "Independent_DABHOI_2", "Independent_DABHOI_3": "Independent_DABHOI_3", "Independent_DABHOI_4": "Independent_DABHOI_4", "Independent_DANTA_1": "Independent_DANTA_1", "Independent_DARIAPUR_KAZIPUR_1": "Independent_DARIAPUR_KAZIPUR_1", "Independent_DARIAPUR_KAZIPUR_2": "Independent_DARIAPUR_KAZIPUR_2", "Independent_DARIAPUR_KAZIPUR_3": "Independent_DARIAPUR_KAZIPUR_3", "Independent_DARIAPUR_KAZIPUR_4": "Independent_DARIAPUR_KAZIPUR_4", "Independent_DARIAPUR_KAZIPUR_5": "Independent_DARIAPUR_KAZIPUR_5", "Independent_DARIAPUR_KAZIPUR_6": "Independent_DARIAPUR_KAZIPUR_6", "Independent_DASADA_1": "Independent_DASADA_1", "Independent_DASADA_2": "Independent_DASADA_2", "Independent_DEDIAPADA_1": "Independent_DEDIAPADA_1", "Independent_DEDIAPADA_2": "Independent_DEDIAPADA_2", "Independent_DEDIAPADA_3": "Independent_DEDIAPADA_3", "Independent_DEDIAPADA_4": "Independent_DEDIAPADA_4", "Independent_DEESA_1": "Independent_DEESA_1", "Independent_DEESA_2": "Independent_DEESA_2", "Independent_DEHGAM_1": "Independent_DEHGAM_1", "Independent_DEHGAM_2": "Independent_DEHGAM_2", "Independent_DEODAR_1": "Independent_DEODAR_1", "Independent_DEVGADH_BARIA_1": "Independent_DEVGADH_BARIA_1", "Independent_DEVGADH_BARIA_2": "Independent_DEVGADH_BARIA_2", "Independent_DEVGADH_BARIA_3": "Independent_DEVGADH_BARIA_3", "Independent_DHANDHUKA_1": "Independent_DHANDHUKA_1", "Independent_DHANDHUKA_2": "Independent_DHANDHUKA_2", "Independent_DHANDHUKA_3": "Independent_DHANDHUKA_3", "Independent_DHANERA_1": "Independent_DHANERA_1", "Independent_DHANERA_2": "Independent_DHANERA_2", "Independent_DHANERA_3": "Independent_DHANERA_3", "Independent_DHANERA_4": "Independent_DHANERA_4", "Independent_DHANERA_5": "Independent_DHANERA_5", "Independent_DHARI_1": "Independent_DHARI_1", "Independent_DHARI_2": "Independent_DHARI_2", "Independent_DHARI_3": "Independent_DHARI_3", "Independent_DHARI_4": "Independent_DHARI_4", "Independent_DHARI_5": "Independent_DHARI_5", "Independent_DHARI_6": "Independent_DHARI_6", "Independent_DHARI_7": "Independent_DHARI_7", "Independent_DHOLKA_1": "Independent_DHOLKA_1", "Independent_DHOLKA_2": "Independent_DHOLKA_2", "Independent_DHOLKA_3": "Independent_DHOLKA_3", "Independent_DHORAJI_1": "Independent_DHORAJI_1", "Independent_DHORAJI_2": "Independent_DHORAJI_2", "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_1": "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_1", "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_2": "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_2", "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_3": "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_3", "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_4": "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_4", "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_5": "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_5", "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_6": "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_6", "Independent_DOHAD_1": "Independent_DOHAD_1", "Independent_DOHAD_2": "Independent_DOHAD_2", "Independent_DOHAD_3": "Independent_DOHAD_3", "Independent_DWARKA_1": "Independent_DWARKA_1", "Independent_DWARKA_2": "Independent_DWARKA_2", "Independent_DWARKA_3": "Independent_DWARKA_3", "Independent_DWARKA_4": "Independent_DWARKA_4", "Independent_DWARKA_5": "Independent_DWARKA_5", "Independent_DWARKA_6": "Independent_DWARKA_6", "Independent_ELLIS_BRIDGE_1": "Independent_ELLIS_BRIDGE_1", "Independent_ELLIS_BRIDGE_2": "Independent_ELLIS_BRIDGE_2", "Independent_GADHADA_1": "Independent_GADHADA_1", "Independent_GADHADA_2": "Independent_GADHADA_2", "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_1": "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_1", "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_2": "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_2", "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_3": "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_3", "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_4": "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_4", "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_5": "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_5", "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_6": "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_6", "Independent_GHOGHO_1": "Independent_GHOGHO_1", "Independent_GHOGHO_2": "Independent_GHOGHO_2", "Independent_GHOGHO_3": "Independent_GHOGHO_3", "Independent_GONDAL_1": "Independent_GONDAL_1", "Independent_GONDAL_2": "Independent_GONDAL_2", "Independent_GONDAL_3": "Independent_GONDAL_3", "Independent_GONDAL_4": "Independent_GONDAL_4", "Independent_HALVAD_1": "Independent_HALVAD_1", "Independent_HALVAD_2": "Independent_HALVAD_2", "Independent_HALVAD_3": "Independent_HALVAD_3", "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_1": "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_1", "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_2": "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_2", "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_3": "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_3", "Independent_JALALPORE_1": "Independent_JALALPORE_1", "Independent_JALALPORE_2": "Independent_JALALPORE_2", "Independent_JALALPORE_3": "Independent_JALALPORE_3", "Independent_JAMALPUR_1": "Independent_JAMALPUR_1", "Independent_JAMALPUR_2": "Independent_JAMALPUR_2", "Independent_JAMALPUR_3": "Independent_JAMALPUR_3", "Independent_JAMALPUR_4": "Independent_JAMALPUR_4", "Independent_JAMBUSAR_1": "Independent_JAMBUSAR_1", "Independent_JAMBUSAR_2": "Independent_JAMBUSAR_2", "Independent_JAMBUSAR_3": "Independent_JAMBUSAR_3", "Independent_JAMBUSAR_4": "Independent_JAMBUSAR_4", "Independent_JAMJODHPUR_1": "Independent_JAMJODHPUR_1", "Independent_JAMJODHPUR_2": "Independent_JAMJODHPUR_2", "Independent_JAMJODHPUR_3": "Independent_JAMJODHPUR_3", "Independent_JAMJODHPUR_4": "Independent_JAMJODHPUR_4", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_1": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_1", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_2": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_2", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_3": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_3", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_4": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_4", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_1": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_1", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_2": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_2", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_3": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_3", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_4": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_4", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_5": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_5", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_6": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_6", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_7": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_7", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_8": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_8", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_9": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_9", "Independent_JASDAN_1": "Independent_JASDAN_1", "Independent_JASDAN_2": "Independent_JASDAN_2", "Independent_JASDAN_3": "Independent_JASDAN_3", "Independent_JETPUR_1": "Independent_JETPUR_1", "Independent_JETPUR_2": "Independent_JETPUR_2", "Independent_JETPUR_3": "Independent_JETPUR_3", "Independent_JETPUR_4": "Independent_JETPUR_4", "Independent_JODIYA_1": "Independent_JODIYA_1", "Independent_JODIYA_2": "Independent_JODIYA_2", "Independent_JODIYA_3": "Independent_JODIYA_3", "Independent_JOTANA_1": "Independent_JOTANA_1", "Independent_JUNAGADH_1": "Independent_JUNAGADH_1", "Independent_JUNAGADH_2": "Independent_JUNAGADH_2", "Independent_JUNAGADH_3": "Independent_JUNAGADH_3", "Independent_JUNAGADH_4": "Independent_JUNAGADH_4", "Independent_JUNAGADH_5": "Independent_JUNAGADH_5", "Independent_KADI_1": "Independent_KADI_1", "Independent_KADI_2": "Independent_KADI_2", "Independent_KADI_3": "Independent_KADI_3", "Independent_KADI_4": "Independent_KADI_4", "Independent_KALAWAD_1": "Independent_KALAWAD_1", "Independent_KALAWAD_2": "Independent_KALAWAD_2", "Independent_KALAWAD_3": "Independent_KALAWAD_3", "Independent_KALAWAD_4": "Independent_KALAWAD_4", "Independent_KALAWAD_5": "Independent_KALAWAD_5", "Independent_KALAWAD_6": "Independent_KALAWAD_6", "Independent_KALAWAD_7": "Independent_KALAWAD_7", "Independent_KALOL_1": "Independent_KALOL_1", "Independent_KALOL_2": "Independent_KALOL_2", "Independent_KALOL_3": "Independent_KALOL_3", "Independent_KALOL_4": "Independent_KALOL_4", "Independent_KALOL_5": "Independent_KALOL_5", "Independent_KALUPUR_1": "Independent_KALUPUR_1", "Independent_KALUPUR_2": "Independent_KALUPUR_2", "Independent_KALUPUR_3": "Independent_KALUPUR_3", "Independent_KALUPUR_4": "Independent_KALUPUR_4", "Independent_KALUPUR_5": "Independent_KALUPUR_5", "Independent_KANKREJ_1": "Independent_KANKREJ_1", "Independent_KAPADVANJ_1": "Independent_KAPADVANJ_1", "Independent_KAPADVANJ_2": "Independent_KAPADVANJ_2", "Independent_KAPADVANJ_3": "Independent_KAPADVANJ_3", "Independent_KAPADVANJ_4": "Independent_KAPADVANJ_4", "Independent_KAPADVANJ_5": "Independent_KAPADVANJ_5", "Independent_KHADIA_1": "Independent_KHADIA_1", "Independent_KHADIA_2": "Independent_KHADIA_2", "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_1": "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_1", "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_2": "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_2", "Independent_KHERALU_1": "Independent_KHERALU_1", "Independent_KHERALU_2": "Independent_KHERALU_2", "Independent_KODINAR_1": "Independent_KODINAR_1", "Independent_KODINAR_2": "Independent_KODINAR_2", "Independent_KODINAR_3": "Independent_KODINAR_3", "Independent_KUNDLA_1": "Independent_KUNDLA_1", "Independent_KUNDLA_2": "Independent_KUNDLA_2", "Independent_KUNDLA_3": "Independent_KUNDLA_3", "Independent_KUNDLA_4": "Independent_KUNDLA_4", "Independent_KUNDLA_5": "Independent_KUNDLA_5", "Independent_KUNDLA_6": "Independent_KUNDLA_6", "Independent_KUNDLA_7": "Independent_KUNDLA_7", "Independent_KUTIYANA_1": "Independent_KUTIYANA_1", "Independent_KUTIYANA_2": "Independent_KUTIYANA_2", "Independent_KUTIYANA_3": "Independent_KUTIYANA_3", "Independent_KUTIYANA_4": "Independent_KUTIYANA_4", "Independent_LATHI_1": "Independent_LATHI_1", "Independent_LATHI_2": "Independent_LATHI_2", "Independent_LIMBDI_1": "Independent_LIMBDI_1", "Independent_LIMBDI_2": "Independent_LIMBDI_2", "Independent_LIMBDI_3": "Independent_LIMBDI_3", "Independent_LIMBDI_4": "Independent_LIMBDI_4", "Independent_LIMBDI_5": "Independent_LIMBDI_5", "Independent_LIMBDI_6": "Independent_LIMBDI_6", "Independent_LIMKHEDA_1": "Independent_LIMKHEDA_1", "Independent_LIMKHEDA_2": "Independent_LIMKHEDA_2", "Independent_MAHUDHA_1": "Independent_MAHUDHA_1", "Independent_MAHUDHA_2": "Independent_MAHUDHA_2", "Independent_MAHUDHA_3": "Independent_MAHUDHA_3", "Independent_MAHUVA_1": "Independent_MAHUVA_1", "Independent_MAHUVA_2": "Independent_MAHUVA_2", "Independent_MAHUVA_3": "Independent_MAHUVA_3", "Independent_MAHUVA_4": "Independent_MAHUVA_4", "Independent_MAHUVA_5": "Independent_MAHUVA_5", "Independent_MALIYA_1": "Independent_MALIYA_1", "Independent_MALIYA_2": "Independent_MALIYA_2", "Independent_MALIYA_3": "Independent_MALIYA_3", "Independent_MALIYA_4": "Independent_MALIYA_4", "Independent_MANAVADAR_1": "Independent_MANAVADAR_1", "Independent_MANAVADAR_2": "Independent_MANAVADAR_2", "Independent_MANAVADAR_3": "Independent_MANAVADAR_3", "Independent_MANAVADAR_4": "Independent_MANAVADAR_4", "Independent_MANAVADAR_5": "Independent_MANAVADAR_5", "Independent_MANAVADAR_6": "Independent_MANAVADAR_6", "Independent_MANAVADAR_7": "Independent_MANAVADAR_7", "Independent_MANAVADAR_8": "Independent_MANAVADAR_8", "Independent_MANAVADAR_9": "Independent_MANAVADAR_9", "Independent_MANDAL_1": "Independent_MANDAL_1", "Independent_MANDAL_2": "Independent_MANDAL_2", "Independent_MANDAL_3": "Independent_MANDAL_3", "Independent_MANDAL_4": "Independent_MANDAL_4", "Independent_MANDAL_5": "Independent_MANDAL_5", "Independent_MANDVI_1": "Independent_MANDVI_1", "Independent_MANDVI_2": "Independent_MANDVI_2", "Independent_MANDVI_3": "Independent_MANDVI_3", "Independent_MANDVI_4": "Independent_MANDVI_4", "Independent_MANDVI_5": "Independent_MANDVI_5", "Independent_MANGROL_1": "Independent_MANGROL_1", "Independent_MANGROL_2": "Independent_MANGROL_2", "Independent_MANGROL_3": "Independent_MANGROL_3", "Independent_MANGROL_4": "Independent_MANGROL_4", "Independent_MANINAGAR_1": "Independent_MANINAGAR_1", "Independent_MANSA_1": "Independent_MANSA_1", "Independent_MANSA_2": "Independent_MANSA_2", "Independent_MEGHRAJ_1": "Independent_MEGHRAJ_1", "Independent_MEGHRAJ_2": "Independent_MEGHRAJ_2", "Independent_MEHSANA_1": "Independent_MEHSANA_1", "Independent_MEHSANA_2": "Independent_MEHSANA_2", "Independent_MEHSANA_3": "Independent_MEHSANA_3", "Independent_MODASA_1": "Independent_MODASA_1", "Independent_MORVI_1": "Independent_MORVI_1", "Independent_MORVI_2": "Independent_MORVI_2", "Independent_MORVI_3": "Independent_MORVI_3", "Independent_MORVI_4": "Independent_MORVI_4", "Independent_MORVI_5": "Independent_MORVI_5", "Independent_MORVI_6": "Independent_MORVI_6", "Independent_MORVI_7": "Independent_MORVI_7", "Independent_MORVI_8": "Independent_MORVI_8", "Independent_MOTA_PONDHA_1": "Independent_MOTA_PONDHA_1", "Independent_MOTA_PONDHA_2": "Independent_MOTA_PONDHA_2", "Independent_MOTA_PONDHA_3": "Independent_MOTA_PONDHA_3", "Independent_NADIAD_1": "Independent_NADIAD_1", "Independent_NADIAD_2": "Independent_NADIAD_2", "Independent_NARODA_1": "Independent_NARODA_1", "Independent_NARODA_2": "Independent_NARODA_2", "Independent_NASVADI_1": "Independent_NASVADI_1", "Independent_NASVADI_2": "Independent_NASVADI_2", "Independent_NASVADI_3": "Independent_NASVADI_3", "Independent_NIJHAR_1": "Independent_NIJHAR_1", "Independent_NIJHAR_2": "Independent_NIJHAR_2", "Independent_NIJHAR_3": "Independent_NIJHAR_3", "Independent_OLPAD_1": "Independent_OLPAD_1", "Independent_PADRA_1": "Independent_PADRA_1", "Independent_PALANPUR_1": "Independent_PALANPUR_1", "Independent_PALANPUR_2": "Independent_PALANPUR_2", "Independent_PALANPUR_3": "Independent_PALANPUR_3", "Independent_PALANPUR_4": "Independent_PALANPUR_4", "Independent_PALANPUR_5": "Independent_PALANPUR_5", "Independent_PALANPUR_6": "Independent_PALANPUR_6", "Independent_PALITANA_1": "Independent_PALITANA_1", "Independent_PALITANA_2": "Independent_PALITANA_2", "Independent_PALITANA_3": "Independent_PALITANA_3", "Independent_PALITANA_4": "Independent_PALITANA_4", "Independent_PALITANA_5": "Independent_PALITANA_5", "Independent_PATAN_1": "Independent_PATAN_1", "Independent_PATAN_2": "Independent_PATAN_2", "Independent_PATAN_3": "Independent_PATAN_3", "Independent_PETLAD_1": "Independent_PETLAD_1", "Independent_PORBANDAR_1": "Independent_PORBANDAR_1", "Independent_PORBANDAR_10": "Independent_PORBANDAR_10", "Independent_PORBANDAR_11": "Independent_PORBANDAR_11", "Independent_PORBANDAR_2": "Independent_PORBANDAR_2", "Independent_PORBANDAR_3": "Independent_PORBANDAR_3", "Independent_PORBANDAR_4": "Independent_PORBANDAR_4", "Independent_PORBANDAR_5": "Independent_PORBANDAR_5", "Independent_PORBANDAR_6": "Independent_PORBANDAR_6", "Independent_PORBANDAR_7": "Independent_PORBANDAR_7", "Independent_PORBANDAR_8": "Independent_PORBANDAR_8", "Independent_PORBANDAR_9": "Independent_PORBANDAR_9", "Independent_RADHANPUR_1": "Independent_RADHANPUR_1", "Independent_RADHANPUR_2": "Independent_RADHANPUR_2", "Independent_RADHANPUR_3": "Independent_RADHANPUR_3", "Independent_RADHANPUR_4": "Independent_RADHANPUR_4", "Independent_RADHANPUR_5": "Independent_RADHANPUR_5", "Independent_RADHANPUR_6": "Independent_RADHANPUR_6", "Independent_RAJGADH_1": "Independent_RAJGADH_1", "Independent_RAJKOT_II_1": "Independent_RAJKOT_II_1", "Independent_RAJKOT_I_1": "Independent_RAJKOT_I_1", "Independent_RAJKOT_I_2": "Independent_RAJKOT_I_2", "Independent_RAJKOT_RURAL_1": "Independent_RAJKOT_RURAL_1", "Independent_RAJKOT_RURAL_2": "Independent_RAJKOT_RURAL_2", "Independent_RAJKOT_RURAL_3": "Independent_RAJKOT_RURAL_3", "Independent_RAJPIPLA_1": "Independent_RAJPIPLA_1", "Independent_RAJULA_1": "Independent_RAJULA_1", "Independent_RAJULA_2": "Independent_RAJULA_2", "Independent_RAKHIAL_1": "Independent_RAKHIAL_1", "Independent_RAKHIAL_2": "Independent_RAKHIAL_2", "Independent_RAKHIAL_3": "Independent_RAKHIAL_3", "Independent_RAKHIAL_4": "Independent_RAKHIAL_4", "Independent_RAKHIAL_5": "Independent_RAKHIAL_5", "Independent_RAKHIAL_6": "Independent_RAKHIAL_6", "Independent_RAKHIAL_7": "Independent_RAKHIAL_7", "Independent_RAOPURA_1": "Independent_RAOPURA_1", "Independent_RAPAR_1": "Independent_RAPAR_1", "Independent_SABARMATI_1": "Independent_SABARMATI_1", "Independent_SANKHEDA_1": "Independent_SANKHEDA_1", "Independent_SANKHEDA_2": "Independent_SANKHEDA_2", "Independent_SANKHEDA_3": "Independent_SANKHEDA_3", "Independent_SANTRAMPUR_1": "Independent_SANTRAMPUR_1", "Independent_SARKHEJ_1": "Independent_SARKHEJ_1", "Independent_SARKHEJ_2": "Independent_SARKHEJ_2", "Independent_SARKHEJ_3": "Independent_SARKHEJ_3", "Independent_SARKHEJ_4": "Independent_SARKHEJ_4", "Independent_SARSA_1": "Independent_SARSA_1", "Independent_SAYAJIGANJ_1": "Independent_SAYAJIGANJ_1", "Independent_SAYAJIGANJ_2": "Independent_SAYAJIGANJ_2", "Independent_SAYAJIGANJ_3": "Independent_SAYAJIGANJ_3", "Independent_SAYAJIGANJ_4": "Independent_SAYAJIGANJ_4", "Independent_SAYAJIGANJ_5": "Independent_SAYAJIGANJ_5", "Independent_SHAHPUR_1": "Independent_SHAHPUR_1", "Independent_SHAHPUR_2": "Independent_SHAHPUR_2", "Independent_SHAHPUR_3": "Independent_SHAHPUR_3", "Independent_SHAHPUR_4": "Independent_SHAHPUR_4", "Independent_SHAHPUR_5": "Independent_SHAHPUR_5", "Independent_SIDHPUR_1": "Independent_SIDHPUR_1", "Independent_SIHOR_1": "Independent_SIHOR_1", "Independent_SOMNATH_1": "Independent_SOMNATH_1", "Independent_SOMNATH_2": "Independent_SOMNATH_2", "Independent_SOMNATH_3": "Independent_SOMNATH_3", "Independent_SOMNATH_4": "Independent_SOMNATH_4", "Independent_SOMNATH_5": "Independent_SOMNATH_5", "Independent_SOMNATH_6": "Independent_SOMNATH_6", "Independent_SONGADH_1": "Independent_SONGADH_1", "Independent_SONGADH_2": "Independent_SONGADH_2", "Independent_SURAT_CITY_EAST_1": "Independent_SURAT_CITY_EAST_1", "Independent_SURAT_CITY_EAST_2": "Independent_SURAT_CITY_EAST_2", "Independent_SURAT_CITY_EAST_3": "Independent_SURAT_CITY_EAST_3", "Independent_SURAT_CITY_EAST_4": "Independent_SURAT_CITY_EAST_4", "Independent_SURAT_CITY_EAST_5": "Independent_SURAT_CITY_EAST_5", "Independent_SURAT_CITY_NORTH_1": "Independent_SURAT_CITY_NORTH_1", "Independent_SURAT_CITY_NORTH_2": "Independent_SURAT_CITY_NORTH_2", "Independent_SURAT_CITY_NORTH_3": "Independent_SURAT_CITY_NORTH_3", "Independent_SURAT_CITY_WEST_1": "Independent_SURAT_CITY_WEST_1", "Independent_SURAT_CITY_WEST_2": "Independent_SURAT_CITY_WEST_2", "Independent_SURAT_CITY_WEST_3": "Independent_SURAT_CITY_WEST_3", "Independent_SURAT_CITY_WEST_4": "Independent_SURAT_CITY_WEST_4", "Independent_TALAJA_1": "Independent_TALAJA_1", "Independent_TALAJA_2": "Independent_TALAJA_2", "Independent_TALALA_1": "Independent_TALALA_1", "Independent_TANKARA_1": "Independent_TANKARA_1", "Independent_TANKARA_2": "Independent_TANKARA_2", "Independent_UMBERGAON_1": "Independent_UMBERGAON_1", "Independent_UMBERGAON_2": "Independent_UMBERGAON_2", "Independent_UMRETH_1": "Independent_UMRETH_1", "Independent_UMRETH_2": "Independent_UMRETH_2", "Independent_UNA_1": "Independent_UNA_1", "Independent_VADGAM_1": "Independent_VADGAM_1", "Independent_VAGDOD_1": "Independent_VAGDOD_1", "Independent_VAGDOD_2": "Independent_VAGDOD_2", "Independent_VAGDOD_3": "Independent_VAGDOD_3", "Independent_VAGHODIA_1": "Independent_VAGHODIA_1", "Independent_VAGHODIA_2": "Independent_VAGHODIA_2", "Independent_VAGHODIA_3": "Independent_VAGHODIA_3", "Independent_VAGHODIA_4": "Independent_VAGHODIA_4", "Independent_VAGHODIA_5": "Independent_VAGHODIA_5", "Independent_VAGRA_1": "Independent_VAGRA_1", "Independent_VAGRA_2": "Independent_VAGRA_2", "Independent_VAGRA_3": "Independent_VAGRA_3", "Independent_VAGRA_4": "Independent_VAGRA_4", "Independent_VAGRA_5": "Independent_VAGRA_5", "Independent_VAV_1": "Independent_VAV_1", "Independent_VAV_2": "Independent_VAV_2", "Independent_VAV_3": "Independent_VAV_3", "Independent_VAV_4": "Independent_VAV_4", "Independent_VIJAPUR_1": "Independent_VIJAPUR_1", "Independent_VIJAPUR_2": "Independent_VIJAPUR_2", "Independent_VIRAMGAM_1": "Independent_VIRAMGAM_1", "Independent_VIRAMGAM_2": "Independent_VIRAMGAM_2", "Independent_VISAVADAR_1": "Independent_VISAVADAR_1", "Independent_VISNAGAR_1": "Independent_VISNAGAR_1", "Independent_VYARA_1": "Independent_VYARA_1", "Independent_VYARA_2": "Independent_VYARA_2", "Independent_WADHWAN_1": "Independent_WADHWAN_1", "Independent_WADHWAN_2": "Independent_WADHWAN_2", "Independent_WADHWAN_3": "Independent_WADHWAN_3", "Independent_WANKANER_1": "Independent_WANKANER_1", "Independent_WANKANER_2": "Independent_WANKANER_2", "Independent_WANKANER_3": "Independent_WANKANER_3", "Independent_WANKANER_4": "Independent_WANKANER_4", "Independent_WANKANER_5": "Independent_WANKANER_5", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "JMP": "JMP", "LJP": "LJP", "LKPT": "LKPT", "LPSP": "LPSP", "LSWP": "LSWP", "NCP": "NCP", "NLP": "NLP", "NSCP": "NSCP", "NSMP": "NSMP", "PRBP": "PRBP", "RJD": "RJD", "RKEP": "RKEP", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "RPI(KH)": "RPI(KH)", "RSDC": "RSDC", "SHS": "SHS", "SJP(R)": "SJP(R)", "SP": "SP", "SPCP": "SPCP", "VHS": "VHS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 182, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 182, "cast_gt_registered": 182}, "n_stations_flagged": 182, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:16:43.926348", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.768, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.854, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.721, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.569, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.111, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 182}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c88b520e1fb041aea210509033b57a26", "name": "Sri Lanka 2024 parliamentary (overnight srilanka_2024_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Sri Lanka", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.elections.gov.lk/pe2024/ (Election Commission of Sri Lanka official results portal)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ACMC": "ACMC", "ACTC": "ACTC", "AITM": "AITM", "AJP": "AJP", "APP": "APP", "DLF": "DLF", "DNA": "DNA", "DP": "DP", "DTNA": "DTNA", "DUA": "DUA", "DUNF": "DUNF", "ELPP": "ELPP", "EPDP": "EPDP", "ERDF": "ERDF", "FPF": "FPF", "IND01-01": "IND01-01", "IND01-02": "IND01-02", "IND01-03": "IND01-03", "IND01-04": "IND01-04", "IND01-05": "IND01-05", "IND01-06": "IND01-06", "IND01-07": "IND01-07", "IND01-08": "IND01-08", "IND01-09": "IND01-09", "IND01-10": "IND01-10", "IND01-11": "IND01-11", "IND01-12": "IND01-12", "IND01-13": "IND01-13", "IND01-14": "IND01-14", "IND01-15": "IND01-15", "IND01-16": "IND01-16", "IND01-17": "IND01-17", "IND01-18": "IND01-18", "IND01-19": "IND01-19", "IND01-20": "IND01-20", "IND01-21": "IND01-21", "IND01-22": "IND01-22", "IND02-01": "IND02-01", "IND02-02": "IND02-02", "IND02-03": "IND02-03", "IND02-04": "IND02-04", "IND02-05": "IND02-05", "IND02-06": "IND02-06", "IND02-07": "IND02-07", "IND02-08": "IND02-08", "IND02-09": "IND02-09", "IND02-10": "IND02-10", "IND02-11": "IND02-11", "IND02-12": "IND02-12", "IND02-13": "IND02-13", "IND02-14": "IND02-14", "IND02-15": "IND02-15", "IND02-16": "IND02-16", "IND02-17": "IND02-17", "IND02-18": "IND02-18", "IND02-19": "IND02-19", "IND02-20": "IND02-20", "IND02-21": "IND02-21", "IND02-22": "IND02-22", "IND03-01": "IND03-01", "IND03-02": "IND03-02", "IND03-03": "IND03-03", "IND03-04": "IND03-04", "IND03-05": "IND03-05", "IND03-06": "IND03-06", "IND03-07": "IND03-07", "IND03-08": "IND03-08", "IND03-09": "IND03-09", "IND03-10": "IND03-10", "IND03-11": "IND03-11", "IND03-12": "IND03-12", "IND03-13": "IND03-13", "IND03-14": "IND03-14", "IND03-15": "IND03-15", "IND03-16": "IND03-16", "IND03-17": "IND03-17", "IND03-19": "IND03-19", "IND03-20": "IND03-20", "IND03-21": "IND03-21", "IND03-22": "IND03-22", "IND04-01": "IND04-01", "IND04-02": "IND04-02", "IND04-03": "IND04-03", "IND04-04": "IND04-04", "IND04-05": "IND04-05", "IND04-06": "IND04-06", "IND04-07": "IND04-07", "IND04-08": "IND04-08", "IND04-09": "IND04-09", "IND04-10": "IND04-10", "IND04-11": "IND04-11", "IND04-12": "IND04-12", "IND04-13": "IND04-13", "IND04-14": "IND04-14", "IND04-15": "IND04-15", "IND04-16": "IND04-16", "IND04-17": "IND04-17", "IND04-19": "IND04-19", "IND04-21": "IND04-21", "IND04-22": "IND04-22", "IND05-01": "IND05-01", "IND05-02": "IND05-02", "IND05-03": "IND05-03", "IND05-04": "IND05-04", "IND05-05": "IND05-05", "IND05-06": "IND05-06", "IND05-07": "IND05-07", "IND05-08": "IND05-08", "IND05-09": "IND05-09", "IND05-10": "IND05-10", "IND05-11": "IND05-11", "IND05-12": "IND05-12", "IND05-13": "IND05-13", "IND05-14": "IND05-14", "IND05-15": "IND05-15", "IND05-16": "IND05-16", "IND05-17": "IND05-17", "IND05-19": "IND05-19", "IND05-21": "IND05-21", "IND06-01": "IND06-01", "IND06-02": "IND06-02", "IND06-03": "IND06-03", "IND06-04": "IND06-04", "IND06-05": "IND06-05", "IND06-06": "IND06-06", "IND06-08": "IND06-08", "IND06-09": "IND06-09", "IND06-10": "IND06-10", "IND06-11": "IND06-11", "IND06-12": "IND06-12", "IND06-13": "IND06-13", "IND06-14": "IND06-14", "IND06-15": "IND06-15", "IND06-16": "IND06-16", "IND06-17": "IND06-17", "IND06-21": "IND06-21", "IND07-01": "IND07-01", "IND07-02": "IND07-02", "IND07-03": "IND07-03", "IND07-04": "IND07-04", "IND07-05": "IND07-05", "IND07-06": "IND07-06", "IND07-08": "IND07-08", "IND07-09": "IND07-09", "IND07-10": "IND07-10", "IND07-11": "IND07-11", "IND07-12": "IND07-12", "IND07-13": "IND07-13", "IND07-14": "IND07-14", "IND07-15": "IND07-15", "IND07-16": "IND07-16", "IND07-17": "IND07-17", "IND07-21": "IND07-21", "IND08-01": "IND08-01", "IND08-02": "IND08-02", "IND08-03": "IND08-03", "IND08-04": "IND08-04", "IND08-06": "IND08-06", "IND08-09": "IND08-09", "IND08-10": "IND08-10", "IND08-11": "IND08-11", "IND08-12": "IND08-12", "IND08-13": "IND08-13", "IND08-14": "IND08-14", "IND08-15": "IND08-15", "IND08-16": "IND08-16", "IND08-17": "IND08-17", "IND09-01": "IND09-01", "IND09-02": "IND09-02", "IND09-03": "IND09-03", "IND09-04": "IND09-04", "IND09-06": "IND09-06", "IND09-09": "IND09-09", "IND09-10": "IND09-10", "IND09-11": "IND09-11", "IND09-12": "IND09-12", "IND09-13": "IND09-13", "IND09-14": "IND09-14", "IND09-15": "IND09-15", "IND09-16": "IND09-16", "IND09-17": "IND09-17", "IND10-01": "IND10-01", "IND10-02": "IND10-02", "IND10-03": "IND10-03", "IND10-04": "IND10-04", "IND10-06": "IND10-06", "IND10-10": "IND10-10", "IND10-11": "IND10-11", "IND10-12": "IND10-12", "IND10-13": "IND10-13", "IND10-14": "IND10-14", "IND10-16": "IND10-16", "IND11-01": "IND11-01", "IND11-02": "IND11-02", "IND11-03": "IND11-03", "IND11-04": "IND11-04", "IND11-06": "IND11-06", "IND11-10": "IND11-10", "IND11-11": "IND11-11", "IND11-12": "IND11-12", "IND11-13": "IND11-13", "IND11-14": "IND11-14", "IND11-16": "IND11-16", "IND12-01": "IND12-01", "IND12-02": "IND12-02", "IND12-04": "IND12-04", "IND12-10": "IND12-10", "IND12-11": "IND12-11", "IND12-12": "IND12-12", "IND12-13": "IND12-13", "IND12-14": "IND12-14", "IND12-16": "IND12-16", "IND13-01": "IND13-01", "IND13-02": "IND13-02", "IND13-10": "IND13-10", "IND13-11": "IND13-11", "IND13-12": "IND13-12", "IND13-13": "IND13-13", "IND13-14": "IND13-14", "IND13-16": "IND13-16", "IND14-01": "IND14-01", "IND14-02": "IND14-02", "IND14-10": "IND14-10", "IND14-11": "IND14-11", "IND14-12": "IND14-12", "IND14-13": "IND14-13", "IND14-14": "IND14-14", "IND14-16": "IND14-16", "IND15-01": "IND15-01", "IND15-02": "IND15-02", "IND15-10": "IND15-10", "IND15-11": "IND15-11", "IND15-12": "IND15-12", "IND15-13": "IND15-13", "IND15-16": "IND15-16", "IND16-01": "IND16-01", "IND16-02": "IND16-02", "IND16-10": "IND16-10", "IND16-11": "IND16-11", "IND16-12": "IND16-12", "IND16-13": "IND16-13", "IND17-01": "IND17-01", "IND17-02": "IND17-02", "IND17-10": "IND17-10", "IND17-11": "IND17-11", "IND17-12": "IND17-12", "IND17-13": "IND17-13", "IND18-01": "IND18-01", "IND18-10": "IND18-10", "IND18-11": "IND18-11", "IND18-12": "IND18-12", "IND18-13": "IND18-13", "IND19-01": "IND19-01", "IND19-10": "IND19-10", "IND19-11": "IND19-11", "IND19-12": "IND19-12", "IND19-13": "IND19-13", "IND20-10": "IND20-10", "IND20-11": "IND20-11", "IND20-12": "IND20-12", "IND20-13": "IND20-13", "IND21-10": "IND21-10", "IND21-11": "IND21-11", "IND21-12": "IND21-12", "IND21-13": "IND21-13", "IND22-11": "IND22-11", "IND22-12": "IND22-12", "IND22-13": "IND22-13", "IND23-11": "IND23-11", "IND23-12": "IND23-12", "IND23-13": "IND23-13", "IND24-11": "IND24-11", "IND24-12": "IND24-12", "IND24-13": "IND24-13", "IND25-11": "IND25-11", "IND25-12": "IND25-12", "IND25-13": "IND25-13", "IND26-12": "IND26-12", "IND26-13": "IND26-13", "IND27-12": "IND27-12", "IND27-13": "IND27-13", "IND28-13": "IND28-13", "IND29-13": "IND29-13", "IND30-13": "IND30-13", "IND31-13": "IND31-13", "IND32-13": "IND32-13", "IND33-13": "IND33-13", "IND34-13": "IND34-13", "IND35-13": "IND35-13", "IND36-13": "IND36-13", "IND37-13": "IND37-13", "IND38-13": "IND38-13", "IND39-13": "IND39-13", "IND40-13": "IND40-13", "IND41-13": "IND41-13", "IND42-13": "IND42-13", "IND43-13": "IND43-13", "ITAK": "ITAK", "JPF": "JPF", "JSP": "JSP", "JSWP": "JSWP", "LDP": "LDP", "LJP": "LJP", "NDF": "NDF", "NFGG": "NFGG", "NIF": "NIF", "NLNP": "NLNP", "NPP": "NPP", "NPPT": "NPPT", "NSSP": "NSSP", "PP": "PP", "PPP": "PPP", "PSA": "PSA", "SB": "SB", "SBP": "SBP", "SEP": "SEP", "SJB": "SJB", "SLLP": "SLLP", "SLMC": "SLMC", "SLMP": "SLMP", "SLPP": "SLPP", "SLSP": "SLSP", "TMK": "TMK", "TMVP": "TMVP", "TULF": "TULF", "UDV": "UDV", "UNA": "UNA", "UNFF": "UNFF", "UNP": "UNP", "UPA": "UPA", "USP": "USP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 182, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:16:39.908258", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.677, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.497, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.462, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.085, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.364, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.497, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.497, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.481, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 182}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2b4f269efe614486a007fa209b61519d", "name": "Sri Lanka 2024 presidential (overnight srilanka_2024_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Sri Lanka", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.elections.gov.lk/pre2024/ (Election Commission of Sri Lanka; via Wayback Machine snapshots Nov 2024)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"A.S.P. LIYANAGE (SLLP)": "A.S.P. LIYANAGE (SLLP)", "ABUBAKAR MOHAMED INFAS (DUA)": "ABUBAKAR MOHAMED INFAS (DUA)", "AGAMPODI PRASANGA SURANJEEWA ANOJ DE SILVA (DUNF)": "AGAMPODI PRASANGA SURANJEEWA ANOJ DE SILVA (DUNF)", "AJANTHA DE ZOYSA (RJA)": "AJANTHA DE ZOYSA (RJA)", "AKMEEMANA DAYARATHANA THERO (IND1)": "AKMEEMANA DAYARATHANA THERO (IND1)", "ANURA KUMARA DISSANAYAKE (NPP)": "ANURA KUMARA DISSANAYAKE (NPP)", "ANURUDDHA POLGAMPALA (IND11)": "ANURUDDHA POLGAMPALA (IND11)", "ANURUDDHA ROSHAN RANASINGHE (IND15)": "ANURUDDHA ROSHAN RANASINGHE (IND15)", "ARIYANETHIRAN PAKKIYASELVAM (IND9)": "ARIYANETHIRAN PAKKIYASELVAM (IND9)", "BATHTHARAMULLE SEELARATHANA THERO (JSP)": "BATHTHARAMULLE SEELARATHANA THERO (JSP)", "DILITH JAYAWEERA (SLCP)": "DILITH JAYAWEERA (SLCP)", "DISSANAYAKA MUDIYANSELAGE BANDARANAYAKE (IND13)": "DISSANAYAKA MUDIYANSELAGE BANDARANAYAKE (IND13)", "JANAKA RATNAYAKE (ELPP)": "JANAKA RATNAYAKE (ELPP)", "K.A. KULARATNA (IND6)": "K.A. KULARATNA (IND6)", "K.K. PIYADASA (IND4)": "K.K. PIYADASA (IND4)", "K.R. KRISHAN (APP)": "K.R. KRISHAN (APP)", "KEERTHIE WICKRAMARATNE (AJP)": "KEERTHIE WICKRAMARATNE (AJP)", "LALITH DE SILVA (UNFF)": "LALITH DE SILVA (UNFF)", "MAHINDA DEWAGE (SLSP)": "MAHINDA DEWAGE (SLSP)", "MYLVAGANAM THILAKARAJAH (IND8)": "MYLVAGANAM THILAKARAJAH (IND8)", "NAMAL RAJAPAKSA (SLPP)": "NAMAL RAJAPAKSA (SLPP)", "NAMAL RAJAPAKSHA (SBP)": "NAMAL RAJAPAKSHA (SBP)", "NUWAN BOPEGE (SPF)": "NUWAN BOPEGE (SPF)", "OSHALA HERATH (NIF)": "OSHALA HERATH (NIF)", "PALLIMULLA KAPUGAMAGE ANURA SIDNEY JAYARATHNA (IND7)": "PALLIMULLA KAPUGAMAGE ANURA SIDNEY JAYARATHNA (IND7)", "PANI WIJESIRIWARDENA (SEP)": "PANI WIJESIRIWARDENA (SEP)", "PEMASIRI MANAGE (IND14)": "PEMASIRI MANAGE (IND14)", "PRIYANTHA WICKRAMASINGHE (NSSP)": "PRIYANTHA WICKRAMASINGHE (NSSP)", "RANIL WICKREMESINGHE (IND16)": "RANIL WICKREMESINGHE (IND16)", "SAJITH PREMADASA (SJB)": "SAJITH PREMADASA (SJB)", "SARATH BANDARANAYAKE (NDF)": "SARATH BANDARANAYAKE (NDF)", "SARATH FONSEKA (IND12)": "SARATH FONSEKA (IND12)", "SARATH KEERTHIRATHNA (IND5)": "SARATH KEERTHIRATHNA (IND5)", "SARATH MANAMENDRA (NSU)": "SARATH MANAMENDRA (NSU)", "SIRIPALA AMARASINGHE (IND2)": "SIRIPALA AMARASINGHE (IND2)", "SIRITUNGA JAYASURIYA (USP)": "SIRITUNGA JAYASURIYA (USP)", "VICTOR PERERA (IND10)": "VICTOR PERERA (IND10)", "WIJEYADASA RAJAPAKSHE (JPF)": "WIJEYADASA RAJAPAKSHE (JPF)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 182, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:16:37.256726", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.677, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.497, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.462, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.085, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.364, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.497, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.497, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.481, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 182}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "434e5ac4badd407d96124d4677b45d17", "name": "Nepal 2022 parliamentary (overnight nepal_2022_hor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Nepal", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://result.election.gov.np/JSONFiles/ElectionResultCentral2079.txt", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"district_cd": "district_cd", "province": "province", "cpn_maoist_centre": "cpn_maoist_centre", "cpn_uml": "cpn_uml", "cpn_unified_socialist": "cpn_unified_socialist", "janamat": "janamat", "janata_samajwadi": "janata_samajwadi", "loktantrik_samajwadi": "loktantrik_samajwadi", "nagarik_unmukti": "nagarik_unmukti", "nepal_mazdoor_kisan": "nepal_mazdoor_kisan", "nepali_congress": "nepali_congress", "rastriya_janamorcha": "rastriya_janamorcha", "rastriya_prajatantra": "rastriya_prajatantra", "rastriya_swatantra": "rastriya_swatantra", "other": "other", "independent_333174": "independent_333174", "independent_333175": "independent_333175", "independent_333176": "independent_333176", "independent_333186": "independent_333186", "independent_333190": "independent_333190", "independent_333194": "independent_333194", "independent_333197": "independent_333197", "independent_333199": "independent_333199", "independent_333204": "independent_333204", "independent_333205": "independent_333205", "independent_333206": "independent_333206", "independent_333212": "independent_333212", "independent_333213": "independent_333213", "independent_333222": "independent_333222", "independent_333223": "independent_333223", "independent_333231": "independent_333231", "independent_333240": "independent_333240", "independent_333253": "independent_333253", "independent_333266": "independent_333266", "independent_333268": "independent_333268", "independent_333269": "independent_333269", "independent_333270": "independent_333270", "independent_333285": "independent_333285", "independent_333289": "independent_333289", "independent_333293": "independent_333293", "independent_333294": "independent_333294", "independent_333304": "independent_333304", "independent_333309": "independent_333309", "independent_333311": "independent_333311", "independent_333313": "independent_333313", "independent_333317": "independent_333317", "independent_333318": "independent_333318", "independent_333321": "independent_333321", "independent_333322": "independent_333322", "independent_333323": "independent_333323", "independent_333329": "independent_333329", "independent_333336": "independent_333336", "independent_333338": "independent_333338", "independent_333345": "independent_333345", "independent_333347": "independent_333347", "independent_333350": "independent_333350", "independent_333351": "independent_333351", "independent_333356": "independent_333356", "independent_333359": "independent_333359", "independent_333362": "independent_333362", "independent_333363": "independent_333363", "independent_333364": "independent_333364", "independent_333365": "independent_333365", "independent_333373": "independent_333373", "independent_333374": "independent_333374", "independent_333375": "independent_333375", "independent_333381": "independent_333381", "independent_333383": "independent_333383", "independent_333392": "independent_333392", "independent_333393": "independent_333393", "independent_333398": "independent_333398", "independent_333401": "independent_333401", "independent_333402": "independent_333402", "independent_333414": "independent_333414", "independent_333421": "independent_333421", "independent_333425": "independent_333425", "independent_333436": "independent_333436", "independent_333437": "independent_333437", "independent_333438": "independent_333438", "independent_333439": "independent_333439", "independent_333440": "independent_333440", "independent_333442": "independent_333442", "independent_333443": "independent_333443", "independent_333447": "independent_333447", "independent_333452": "independent_333452", "independent_333457": "independent_333457", "independent_333460": "independent_333460", "independent_333462": "independent_333462", "independent_333464": "independent_333464", "independent_333468": "independent_333468", "independent_333472": "independent_333472", "independent_333473": "independent_333473", "independent_333474": "independent_333474", "independent_333479": "independent_333479", "independent_333480": "independent_333480", "independent_333481": "independent_333481", "independent_333482": "independent_333482", "independent_333486": "independent_333486", "independent_333487": "independent_333487", "independent_333488": "independent_333488", "independent_333489": "independent_333489", "independent_333494": "independent_333494", "independent_333497": "independent_333497", "independent_333502": "independent_333502", "independent_333503": "independent_333503", "independent_333506": "independent_333506", "independent_333507": "independent_333507", "independent_333521": "independent_333521", "independent_333531": "independent_333531", "independent_333541": "independent_333541", "independent_333547": "independent_333547", "independent_333550": "independent_333550", "independent_333556": "independent_333556", "independent_333558": "independent_333558", "independent_333561": "independent_333561", "independent_333567": "independent_333567", "independent_333569": "independent_333569", "independent_333582": "independent_333582", "independent_333586": "independent_333586", "independent_333594": "independent_333594", "independent_333605": "independent_333605", "independent_333608": "independent_333608", "independent_333609": "independent_333609", "independent_333612": "independent_333612", "independent_333613": "independent_333613", "independent_333614": "independent_333614", "independent_333615": "independent_333615", "independent_333619": "independent_333619", "independent_333635": "independent_333635", "independent_333640": "independent_333640", "independent_333641": "independent_333641", "independent_333646": "independent_333646", "independent_333655": "independent_333655", "independent_333662": "independent_333662", "independent_333664": "independent_333664", "independent_333667": "independent_333667", "independent_333675": "independent_333675", "independent_333677": "independent_333677", "independent_333678": "independent_333678", "independent_333682": "independent_333682", "independent_333688": "independent_333688", "independent_333703": "independent_333703", "independent_333705": "independent_333705", "independent_333707": "independent_333707", "independent_333710": "independent_333710", "independent_333715": "independent_333715", "independent_333716": "independent_333716", "independent_333718": "independent_333718", "independent_333722": "independent_333722", "independent_333724": "independent_333724", "independent_333730": "independent_333730", "independent_333743": "independent_333743", "independent_333744": "independent_333744", "independent_333745": "independent_333745", "independent_333749": "independent_333749", "independent_333751": "independent_333751", "independent_333766": "independent_333766", "independent_333768": "independent_333768", "independent_333779": "independent_333779", "independent_333783": "independent_333783", "independent_333784": "independent_333784", "independent_333785": "independent_333785", "independent_333793": "independent_333793", "independent_333796": "independent_333796", "independent_333797": "independent_333797", "independent_333801": "independent_333801", "independent_333805": "independent_333805", "independent_333807": "independent_333807", "independent_333808": "independent_333808", "independent_333824": "independent_333824", "independent_333829": "independent_333829", "independent_333833": "independent_333833", "independent_333843": "independent_333843", "independent_333848": "independent_333848", "independent_333863": "independent_333863", "independent_333866": "independent_333866", "independent_333880": "independent_333880", "independent_333887": "independent_333887", "independent_333897": "independent_333897", "independent_333903": "independent_333903", "independent_333910": "independent_333910", "independent_333918": "independent_333918", "independent_333920": "independent_333920", "independent_333934": "independent_333934", "independent_333944": "independent_333944", "independent_333945": "independent_333945", "independent_333956": "independent_333956", "independent_333960": "independent_333960", "independent_333962": "independent_333962", "independent_333969": "independent_333969", "independent_333998": "independent_333998", "independent_334004": "independent_334004", "independent_334006": "independent_334006", "independent_334009": "independent_334009", "independent_334011": "independent_334011", "independent_334013": "independent_334013", "independent_334027": "independent_334027", "independent_334033": "independent_334033", "independent_334038": "independent_334038", "independent_334039": "independent_334039", "independent_334042": "independent_334042", "independent_334047": "independent_334047", "independent_334052": "independent_334052", "independent_334071": "independent_334071", "independent_334076": "independent_334076", "independent_334077": "independent_334077", "independent_334080": "independent_334080", "independent_334084": "independent_334084", "independent_334089": "independent_334089", "independent_334091": "independent_334091", "independent_334095": "independent_334095", "independent_334104": "independent_334104", "independent_334108": "independent_334108", "independent_334112": "independent_334112", "independent_334119": "independent_334119", "independent_334128": "independent_334128", "independent_334138": "independent_334138", "independent_334151": "independent_334151", "independent_334158": "independent_334158", "independent_334171": "independent_334171", "independent_334172": "independent_334172", "independent_334174": "independent_334174", "independent_334177": "independent_334177", "independent_334191": "independent_334191", "independent_334202": "independent_334202", "independent_334208": "independent_334208", "independent_334210": "independent_334210", "independent_334211": "independent_334211", "independent_334216": "independent_334216", "independent_334234": "independent_334234", "independent_334235": "independent_334235", "independent_334253": "independent_334253", "independent_334255": "independent_334255", "independent_334258": "independent_334258", "independent_334264": "independent_334264", "independent_334270": "independent_334270", "independent_334290": "independent_334290", "independent_334294": "independent_334294", "independent_334302": "independent_334302", "independent_334321": "independent_334321", "independent_334323": "independent_334323", "independent_334332": "independent_334332", "independent_334334": "independent_334334", "independent_334348": "independent_334348", "independent_334365": "independent_334365", "independent_334403": "independent_334403", "independent_334418": "independent_334418", "independent_334419": "independent_334419", "independent_334421": "independent_334421", "independent_334428": "independent_334428", "independent_334430": "independent_334430", "independent_334432": "independent_334432", "independent_334442": "independent_334442", "independent_334457": "independent_334457", "independent_334459": "independent_334459", "independent_334467": "independent_334467", "independent_334469": "independent_334469", "independent_334473": "independent_334473", "independent_334478": "independent_334478", "independent_334479": "independent_334479", "independent_334482": "independent_334482", "independent_334505": "independent_334505", "independent_334517": "independent_334517", "independent_334534": "independent_334534", "independent_334539": "independent_334539", "independent_334546": "independent_334546", "independent_334556": "independent_334556", "independent_334573": "independent_334573", "independent_334575": "independent_334575", "independent_334582": "independent_334582", "independent_334584": "independent_334584", "independent_334590": "independent_334590", "independent_334591": "independent_334591", "independent_334608": "independent_334608", "independent_334631": "independent_334631", "independent_334636": "independent_334636", "independent_334638": "independent_334638", "independent_334640": "independent_334640", "independent_334641": "independent_334641", "independent_334642": "independent_334642", "independent_334658": "independent_334658", "independent_334659": "independent_334659", "independent_334670": "independent_334670", "independent_334675": "independent_334675", "independent_334677": "independent_334677", "independent_334681": "independent_334681", "independent_334687": "independent_334687", "independent_334697": "independent_334697", "independent_334705": "independent_334705", "independent_334716": "independent_334716", "independent_334718": "independent_334718", "independent_334729": "independent_334729", "independent_334730": "independent_334730", "independent_334744": "independent_334744", "independent_334754": "independent_334754", "independent_334755": "independent_334755", "independent_334768": "independent_334768", "independent_334770": "independent_334770", "independent_334771": "independent_334771", "independent_334781": "independent_334781", "independent_334784": "independent_334784", "independent_334787": "independent_334787", "independent_334789": "independent_334789", "independent_334795": "independent_334795", "independent_334809": "independent_334809", "independent_334813": "independent_334813", "independent_334816": "independent_334816", "independent_334819": "independent_334819", "independent_334828": "independent_334828", "independent_334842": "independent_334842", "independent_334844": "independent_334844", "independent_334845": "independent_334845", "independent_334849": "independent_334849", "independent_334863": "independent_334863", "independent_334864": "independent_334864", "independent_334869": "independent_334869", "independent_334874": "independent_334874", "independent_334875": "independent_334875", "independent_334886": "independent_334886", "independent_334890": "independent_334890", "independent_334891": "independent_334891", "independent_334907": "independent_334907", "independent_334917": "independent_334917", "independent_334920": "independent_334920", "independent_334929": "independent_334929", "independent_334950": "independent_334950", "independent_334966": "independent_334966", "independent_334970": "independent_334970", "independent_334973": "independent_334973", "independent_334984": "independent_334984", "independent_334986": "independent_334986", "independent_334992": "independent_334992", "independent_335009": "independent_335009", "independent_335033": "independent_335033", "independent_335034": "independent_335034", "independent_335045": "independent_335045", "independent_335054": "independent_335054", "independent_335062": "independent_335062", "independent_335072": "independent_335072", "independent_335074": "independent_335074", "independent_335076": "independent_335076", "independent_335098": "independent_335098", "independent_335104": "independent_335104", "independent_335105": "independent_335105", "independent_335109": "independent_335109", "independent_335110": "independent_335110", "independent_335116": "independent_335116", "independent_335122": "independent_335122", "independent_335125": "independent_335125", "independent_335128": "independent_335128", "independent_335132": "independent_335132", "independent_335134": "independent_335134", "independent_335142": "independent_335142", "independent_335170": "independent_335170", "independent_335174": "independent_335174", "independent_335178": "independent_335178", "independent_335181": "independent_335181", "independent_335190": "independent_335190", "independent_335206": "independent_335206", "independent_335207": "independent_335207", "independent_335225": "independent_335225", "independent_335228": "independent_335228", "independent_335242": "independent_335242", "independent_335250": "independent_335250", "independent_335251": "independent_335251", "independent_335255": "independent_335255", "independent_335257": "independent_335257", "independent_335261": "independent_335261", "independent_335267": "independent_335267", "independent_335270": "independent_335270", "independent_335275": "independent_335275", "independent_335289": "independent_335289", "independent_335293": "independent_335293", "independent_335294": "independent_335294", "independent_335307": "independent_335307", "independent_335311": "independent_335311", "independent_335327": "independent_335327", "independent_335344": "independent_335344", "independent_335353": "independent_335353", "independent_335355": "independent_335355", "independent_335360": "independent_335360", "independent_335367": "independent_335367", "independent_335373": "independent_335373", "independent_335416": "independent_335416", "independent_335418": "independent_335418", "independent_335423": "independent_335423", "independent_335426": "independent_335426", "independent_335431": "independent_335431", "independent_335438": "independent_335438", "independent_335440": "independent_335440", "independent_335454": "independent_335454", "independent_335455": "independent_335455", "independent_335456": "independent_335456", "independent_335472": "independent_335472", "independent_335477": "independent_335477", "independent_335480": "independent_335480", "independent_335490": "independent_335490", "independent_335493": "independent_335493", "independent_335494": "independent_335494", "independent_335512": "independent_335512", "independent_335529": "independent_335529", "independent_335534": "independent_335534", "independent_335536": "independent_335536", "independent_335554": "independent_335554", "independent_335558": "independent_335558", "independent_335568": "independent_335568", "independent_335569": "independent_335569", "independent_335593": "independent_335593", "independent_335596": "independent_335596", "independent_335611": "independent_335611", "independent_335618": "independent_335618", "independent_335637": "independent_335637", "independent_335645": "independent_335645", "independent_335646": "independent_335646", "independent_335648": "independent_335648", "independent_335661": "independent_335661", "independent_335669": "independent_335669", "independent_335680": "independent_335680", "independent_335682": "independent_335682", "independent_335691": "independent_335691", "independent_335704": "independent_335704", "independent_335705": "independent_335705", "independent_335714": "independent_335714", "independent_335723": "independent_335723", "independent_335724": "independent_335724", "independent_335726": "independent_335726", "independent_335739": "independent_335739", "independent_335740": "independent_335740", "independent_335745": "independent_335745", "independent_335751": "independent_335751", "independent_335756": "independent_335756", "independent_335764": "independent_335764", "independent_335767": "independent_335767", "independent_335778": "independent_335778", "independent_335785": "independent_335785", "independent_335794": "independent_335794", "independent_335801": "independent_335801", "independent_335802": "independent_335802", "independent_335804": "independent_335804", "independent_335809": "independent_335809", "independent_335813": "independent_335813", "independent_335822": "independent_335822", "independent_335835": "independent_335835", "independent_335851": "independent_335851", "independent_335855": "independent_335855", "independent_335858": "independent_335858", "independent_335864": "independent_335864", "independent_335872": "independent_335872", "independent_335874": "independent_335874", "independent_335883": "independent_335883", "independent_335886": "independent_335886", "independent_335894": "independent_335894", "independent_335897": "independent_335897", "independent_335899": "independent_335899", "independent_335900": "independent_335900", "independent_335905": "independent_335905", "independent_335916": "independent_335916", "independent_335930": "independent_335930", "independent_335936": "independent_335936", "independent_335940": "independent_335940", "independent_335954": "independent_335954", "independent_335964": "independent_335964", "independent_335968": "independent_335968", "independent_335971": "independent_335971", "independent_335983": "independent_335983", "independent_335997": "independent_335997", "independent_336008": "independent_336008", "independent_336023": "independent_336023", "independent_336027": "independent_336027", "independent_336037": "independent_336037", "independent_336042": "independent_336042", "independent_336045": "independent_336045", "independent_336049": "independent_336049", "independent_336053": "independent_336053", "independent_336069": "independent_336069", "independent_336074": "independent_336074", "independent_336081": "independent_336081", "independent_336091": "independent_336091", "independent_336098": "independent_336098", "independent_336115": "independent_336115", "independent_336118": "independent_336118", "independent_336167": "independent_336167", "independent_336169": "independent_336169", "independent_336170": "independent_336170", "independent_336172": "independent_336172", "independent_336178": "independent_336178", "independent_336183": "independent_336183", "independent_336184": "independent_336184", "independent_336187": "independent_336187", "independent_336204": "independent_336204", "independent_336221": "independent_336221", "independent_336223": "independent_336223", "independent_336233": "independent_336233", "independent_336236": "independent_336236", "independent_336238": "independent_336238", "independent_336239": "independent_336239", "independent_336259": "independent_336259", "independent_336266": "independent_336266", "independent_336286": "independent_336286", "independent_336291": "independent_336291", "independent_336301": "independent_336301", "independent_336303": "independent_336303", "independent_336308": "independent_336308", "independent_336309": "independent_336309", "independent_336310": "independent_336310", "independent_336318": "independent_336318", "independent_336321": "independent_336321", "independent_336347": "independent_336347", "independent_336351": "independent_336351", "independent_336354": "independent_336354", "independent_336357": "independent_336357", "independent_336359": "independent_336359", "independent_336369": "independent_336369", "independent_336371": "independent_336371", "independent_336373": "independent_336373", "independent_336381": "independent_336381", "independent_336382": "independent_336382", "independent_336392": "independent_336392", "independent_336395": "independent_336395", "independent_336400": "independent_336400", "independent_336405": "independent_336405", "independent_336420": "independent_336420", "independent_336426": "independent_336426", "independent_336442": "independent_336442", "independent_336443": "independent_336443", "independent_336458": "independent_336458", "independent_336482": "independent_336482", "independent_336486": "independent_336486", "independent_336493": "independent_336493", "independent_336505": "independent_336505", "independent_336525": "independent_336525", "independent_336526": "independent_336526", "independent_336528": "independent_336528", "independent_336531": "independent_336531", "independent_336532": "independent_336532", "independent_336545": "independent_336545", "independent_336551": "independent_336551", "independent_336584": "independent_336584", "independent_336602": "independent_336602", "independent_336606": "independent_336606", "independent_336622": "independent_336622", "independent_336634": "independent_336634", "independent_336637": "independent_336637", "independent_336642": "independent_336642", "independent_336644": "independent_336644", "independent_336647": "independent_336647", "independent_336651": "independent_336651", "independent_336655": "independent_336655", "independent_336660": "independent_336660", "independent_336662": "independent_336662", "independent_336663": "independent_336663", "independent_336666": "independent_336666", "independent_336671": "independent_336671", "independent_336678": "independent_336678", "independent_336687": "independent_336687", "independent_336689": "independent_336689", "independent_336701": "independent_336701", "independent_336708": "independent_336708", "independent_336711": "independent_336711", "independent_336712": "independent_336712", "independent_336726": "independent_336726", "independent_336756": "independent_336756", "independent_336758": "independent_336758", "independent_336769": "independent_336769", "independent_336782": "independent_336782", "independent_336800": "independent_336800", "independent_336801": "independent_336801", "independent_336802": "independent_336802", "independent_336815": "independent_336815", "independent_336826": "independent_336826", "independent_336828": "independent_336828", "independent_336829": "independent_336829", "independent_336842": "independent_336842", "independent_336843": "independent_336843", "independent_336856": "independent_336856", "independent_336859": "independent_336859", "independent_336867": "independent_336867", "independent_336870": "independent_336870", "independent_336871": "independent_336871", "independent_336880": "independent_336880", "independent_336887": "independent_336887", "independent_336894": "independent_336894", "independent_336900": "independent_336900", "independent_336903": "independent_336903", "independent_336905": "independent_336905", "independent_336906": "independent_336906", "independent_336933": "independent_336933", "independent_336941": "independent_336941", "independent_336947": "independent_336947", "independent_336958": "independent_336958", "independent_336977": "independent_336977", "independent_336983": "independent_336983", "independent_336987": "independent_336987", "independent_336989": "independent_336989", "independent_336990": "independent_336990", "independent_336992": "independent_336992", "independent_337012": "independent_337012", "independent_337016": "independent_337016", "independent_337033": "independent_337033", "independent_337035": "independent_337035", "independent_337041": "independent_337041", "independent_337046": "independent_337046", "independent_337053": "independent_337053", "independent_337057": "independent_337057", "independent_337071": "independent_337071", "independent_337078": "independent_337078", "independent_337080": "independent_337080", "independent_337084": "independent_337084", "independent_337090": "independent_337090", "independent_337098": "independent_337098", "independent_337106": "independent_337106", "independent_337116": "independent_337116", "independent_337119": "independent_337119", "independent_337131": "independent_337131", "independent_337136": "independent_337136", "independent_337146": "independent_337146", "independent_337150": "independent_337150", "independent_337158": "independent_337158", "independent_337160": "independent_337160", "independent_337162": "independent_337162", "independent_337164": "independent_337164", "independent_337165": "independent_337165", "independent_337167": "independent_337167", "independent_337168": "independent_337168", "independent_337175": "independent_337175", "independent_337200": "independent_337200", "independent_337201": "independent_337201", "independent_337204": "independent_337204", "independent_337208": "independent_337208", "independent_337213": "independent_337213", "independent_337246": "independent_337246", "independent_337251": "independent_337251", "independent_337252": "independent_337252", "independent_337258": "independent_337258", "independent_337272": "independent_337272", "independent_337273": "independent_337273", "independent_337275": "independent_337275", "independent_337276": "independent_337276", "independent_337319": "independent_337319", "independent_337327": "independent_337327", "independent_337343": "independent_337343", "independent_337365": "independent_337365", "independent_337369": "independent_337369", "independent_337372": "independent_337372", "independent_337377": "independent_337377", "independent_337378": "independent_337378", "independent_337381": "independent_337381", "independent_337386": "independent_337386", "independent_337387": "independent_337387", "independent_337388": "independent_337388", "independent_337395": "independent_337395", "independent_337399": "independent_337399", "independent_337412": "independent_337412", "independent_337423": "independent_337423", "independent_337426": "independent_337426", "independent_337441": "independent_337441", "independent_337449": "independent_337449", "independent_337463": "independent_337463", "independent_337464": "independent_337464", "independent_337488": "independent_337488", "independent_337505": "independent_337505", "independent_337510": "independent_337510", "independent_337518": "independent_337518", "independent_337525": "independent_337525", "independent_337537": "independent_337537", "independent_337539": "independent_337539", "independent_337544": "independent_337544", "independent_337572": "independent_337572", "independent_337577": "independent_337577", "independent_337579": "independent_337579", "independent_337581": "independent_337581", "independent_337605": "independent_337605", "independent_337609": "independent_337609", "independent_337615": "independent_337615", "independent_337622": "independent_337622", "independent_337623": "independent_337623", "independent_337625": "independent_337625", "independent_337638": "independent_337638", "independent_337639": "independent_337639", "independent_337645": "independent_337645", "independent_337652": "independent_337652", "independent_337659": "independent_337659", "independent_337672": "independent_337672", "independent_337677": "independent_337677", "independent_337680": "independent_337680", "independent_337681": "independent_337681", "independent_337682": "independent_337682", "independent_337691": "independent_337691", "independent_337692": "independent_337692", "independent_337697": "independent_337697", "independent_337700": "independent_337700", "independent_337720": "independent_337720", "independent_337724": "independent_337724", "independent_337725": "independent_337725", "independent_337727": "independent_337727", "independent_337728": "independent_337728", "independent_337729": "independent_337729", "independent_337737": "independent_337737", "independent_337745": "independent_337745", "independent_337755": "independent_337755", "independent_337760": "independent_337760", "independent_337769": "independent_337769", "independent_337775": "independent_337775", "independent_337779": "independent_337779", "independent_337787": "independent_337787", "independent_337788": "independent_337788", "independent_337796": "independent_337796", "independent_337804": "independent_337804", "independent_337805": "independent_337805", "independent_337827": "independent_337827", "independent_337832": "independent_337832", "independent_337835": "independent_337835", "independent_337846": "independent_337846", "independent_337859": "independent_337859", "independent_337882": "independent_337882", "independent_337883": "independent_337883", "independent_337886": "independent_337886", "independent_337887": "independent_337887", "independent_337889": "independent_337889", "independent_337895": "independent_337895", "independent_337918": "independent_337918", "independent_337935": "independent_337935", "independent_337948": "independent_337948", "independent_337960": "independent_337960", "independent_337967": "independent_337967", "independent_337969": "independent_337969", "independent_337970": "independent_337970", "independent_337984": "independent_337984", "independent_337987": "independent_337987", "independent_337998": "independent_337998", "independent_338003": "independent_338003", "independent_338012": "independent_338012", "independent_338015": "independent_338015", "independent_338022": "independent_338022", "independent_338025": "independent_338025", "independent_338026": "independent_338026", "independent_338051": "independent_338051", "independent_338056": "independent_338056", "independent_338069": "independent_338069", "independent_338082": "independent_338082", "independent_338089": "independent_338089", "independent_338099": "independent_338099", "independent_338104": "independent_338104", "independent_338106": "independent_338106", "independent_338128": "independent_338128", "independent_338142": "independent_338142", "independent_338144": "independent_338144", "independent_338146": "independent_338146", "independent_338157": "independent_338157", "independent_338163": "independent_338163", "independent_338175": "independent_338175", "independent_338179": "independent_338179", "independent_338193": "independent_338193", "independent_338204": "independent_338204", "independent_338205": "independent_338205", "independent_338218": "independent_338218", "independent_338223": "independent_338223", "independent_338226": "independent_338226", "independent_338229": "independent_338229", "independent_338238": "independent_338238", "independent_338247": "independent_338247", "independent_338263": "independent_338263", "independent_338274": "independent_338274", "independent_338295": "independent_338295", "independent_338306": "independent_338306", "independent_338310": "independent_338310", "independent_338313": "independent_338313", "independent_338328": "independent_338328", "independent_338330": "independent_338330", "independent_338334": "independent_338334", "independent_338335": "independent_338335", "independent_338337": "independent_338337", "independent_338343": "independent_338343", "independent_338358": "independent_338358", "independent_338359": "independent_338359", "independent_338372": "independent_338372", "independent_338381": "independent_338381", "independent_338386": "independent_338386", "independent_338388": "independent_338388", "independent_338401": "independent_338401", "independent_338403": "independent_338403", "independent_338408": "independent_338408", "independent_338422": "independent_338422", "independent_338423": "independent_338423", "independent_338425": "independent_338425", "independent_338431": "independent_338431", "independent_338435": "independent_338435", "independent_338442": "independent_338442", "independent_338455": "independent_338455", "independent_338468": "independent_338468", "independent_338473": "independent_338473", "independent_338493": "independent_338493", "independent_338498": "independent_338498", "independent_338499": "independent_338499", "independent_338503": "independent_338503", "independent_338508": "independent_338508", "independent_338515": "independent_338515", "independent_338518": "independent_338518", "independent_338534": "independent_338534", "independent_338548": "independent_338548", "independent_338552": "independent_338552", "independent_338553": "independent_338553", "independent_338576": "independent_338576", "independent_338582": "independent_338582", "independent_338592": "independent_338592", "independent_338596": "independent_338596", "independent_338598": "independent_338598", "independent_338623": "independent_338623", "independent_338636": "independent_338636", "independent_338640": "independent_338640", "independent_338641": "independent_338641", "independent_338645": "independent_338645", "independent_338649": "independent_338649", "independent_338655": "independent_338655", "independent_338656": "independent_338656", "independent_338661": "independent_338661", "independent_338675": "independent_338675", "independent_338676": "independent_338676", "independent_338696": "independent_338696", "independent_338700": "independent_338700", "independent_338706": "independent_338706", "independent_338724": "independent_338724", "independent_338739": "independent_338739", "independent_338745": "independent_338745", "independent_338757": "independent_338757", "independent_338758": "independent_338758", "independent_338761": "independent_338761", "independent_338767": "independent_338767", "independent_338771": "independent_338771", "independent_338774": "independent_338774", "independent_338784": "independent_338784", "independent_338790": "independent_338790", "independent_338799": "independent_338799", "independent_338804": "independent_338804", "independent_338815": "independent_338815", "independent_338819": "independent_338819", "independent_338834": "independent_338834", "independent_338842": "independent_338842", "independent_338864": "independent_338864", "independent_338869": "independent_338869", "independent_338874": "independent_338874", "independent_338880": "independent_338880", "independent_338881": "independent_338881", "independent_338886": "independent_338886", "independent_338893": "independent_338893", "independent_338915": "independent_338915", "independent_338924": "independent_338924", "independent_338927": "independent_338927", "independent_338932": "independent_338932", "independent_338937": "independent_338937", "independent_338938": "independent_338938", "independent_338941": "independent_338941", "independent_338946": "independent_338946", "independent_338947": "independent_338947", "independent_338965": "independent_338965", "independent_338979": "independent_338979", "independent_338993": "independent_338993", "independent_338996": "independent_338996", "independent_339037": "independent_339037", "independent_339038": "independent_339038", "independent_339048": "independent_339048", "independent_339051": "independent_339051", "independent_339072": "independent_339072", "independent_339079": "independent_339079", "independent_339084": "independent_339084", "independent_339086": "independent_339086", "independent_339089": "independent_339089", "independent_339092": "independent_339092", "independent_339096": "independent_339096", "independent_339098": "independent_339098", "independent_339099": "independent_339099", "independent_339110": "independent_339110", "independent_339127": "independent_339127", "independent_339129": "independent_339129", "independent_339135": "independent_339135", "independent_339155": "independent_339155", "independent_339160": "independent_339160", "independent_339176": "independent_339176", "independent_339179": "independent_339179", "independent_339181": "independent_339181", "independent_339186": "independent_339186", "independent_339222": "independent_339222"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 165, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 165, "registered_not_positive": 165}, "n_stations_flagged": 165, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:16:35.533531", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.502, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.705, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.631, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.501, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.502, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.705, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.151, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.181, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.836, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.626, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.501, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.501, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.412, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.773, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.773, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.613, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.613, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 165}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "aa5f1038b64a4bbaaa08e3792b0a45af", "name": "Pakistan 2024 parliamentary (overnight pakistan_2024_sindh_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/nasirhussainn/General-Election-2024-Pakistan (file: Sindh_balochistan.csv)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AATP": "AATP", "AL": "AL", "ALI": "ALI", "ANP": "ANP", "APP-S": "APP-S", "AT": "AT", "AWP": "AWP", "BNP": "BNP", "BPP": "BPP", "GDA": "GDA", "HQM": "HQM", "IND": "IND", "IND-PTI": "IND-PTI", "IPP": "IPP", "ITP": "ITP", "JIP": "JIP", "JUI": "JUI", "JUI-N": "JUI-N", "JUI-NP": "JUI-NP", "JUIF": "JUIF", "JUP-S": "JUP-S", "JUPIN": "JUPIN", "JUPNI": "JUPNI", "JWP": "JWP", "KI": "KI", "KS": "KS", "MJAH-P": "MJAH-P", "MML": "MML", "MOTP": "MOTP", "MQM": "MQM", "MQM-P": "MQM-P", "MWM": "MWM", "NDM": "NDM", "PAT": "PAT", "PCP": "PCP", "PDP": "PDP", "PFP": "PFP", "PIRP": "PIRP", "PKMAP": "PKMAP", "PMA": "PMA", "PML": "PML", "PML-N": "PML-N", "PML-Qayyum": "PML-Qayyum", "PML-Z": "PML-Z", "PMLSAF": "PMLSAF", "PNAP": "PNAP", "PNP": "PNP", "PPP": "PPP", "PPP-SB": "PPP-SB", "PRP": "PRP", "PTI-N": "PTI-N", "RJUI": "RJUI", "SKQM": "SKQM", "TLP": "TLP", "TPP": "TPP", "TSH": "TSH", "TTP": "TTP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 130, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 130, "registered_not_positive": 130}, "n_stations_flagged": 130, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:16:30.407262", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.168, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.339, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.313, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.193, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.168, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.339, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.631, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.436, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.109, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.462, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.223, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.406, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.313, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.313, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.193, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.114, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.586, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.586, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.818, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.559, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 130}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a75586469249400f9ac95e1eaa65529d", "name": "Pakistan 2024 provincial (overnight pakistan_2024_kp_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "other", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ADP": "ADP", "ADPP": "ADPP", "ANP": "ANP", "ATP": "ATP", "AWP": "AWP", "BPP": "BPP", "GRDP": "GRDP", "HQM": "HQM", "HQMP": "HQMP", "Independent": "Independent", "JIP": "JIP", "JUI-F": "JUI-F", "JUI-N": "JUI-N", "JUI-S": "JUI-S", "JUI-SS": "JUI-SS", "JUP": "JUP", "JUP-N": "JUP-N", "JUS": "JUS", "JWP": "JWP", "MOTP": "MOTP", "MQM": "MQM", "MQM-P": "MQM-P", "MWM": "MWM", "NDM": "NDM", "PAAM": "PAAM", "PAIL": "PAIL", "PAT": "PAT", "PIRP": "PIRP", "PKMAP": "PKMAP", "PKNAP": "PKNAP", "PML-N": "PML-N", "PML-Q": "PML-Q", "PML-Z": "PML-Z", "PMML": "PMML", "PNP": "PNP", "PPP": "PPP", "PRP": "PRP", "PTI-N": "PTI-N", "PTI-P": "PTI-P", "PTSP": "PTSP", "QWP": "QWP", "RJUI": "RJUI", "RUJI": "RUJI", "SIC": "SIC", "SKQM": "SKQM", "TDP": "TDP", "TIPM": "TIPM", "TJP": "TJP", "TLP": "TLP", "TSH": "TSH", "TTP": "TTP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 115, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 115, "cast_gt_registered": 115}, "n_stations_flagged": 115, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:16:28.864484", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.168, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.339, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.313, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.193, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.168, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.339, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.631, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.436, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.109, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.462, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.223, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.406, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.313, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.313, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.193, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.114, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.586, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.586, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.818, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.559, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 115}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4a59eb4e782a4d60b162bc583af31027", "name": "Maldives 2024 parliamentary (overnight maldives_2024_majlis.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Maldives", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PNC": "PNC", "MDP": "MDP", "Democrats": "Democrats", "JP": "JP", "AP": "AP", "MDA": "MDA", "MNP": "MNP", "IND": "IND"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 93, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 93, "registered_not_positive": 93}, "n_stations_flagged": 93, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:16:27.346697", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.205, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.111, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.577, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.435, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.205, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.111, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.236, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.448, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.775, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.091, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.523, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.577, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.435, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.435, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.746, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.411, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.411, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 93}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9c7bce98701a4859bd73900dc2e37982", "name": "Bhutan 2024 parliamentary (overnight bhutan_2024_national_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bhutan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PDP": "PDP", "BTP": "BTP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 31, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-07T03:16:26.292594", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.709, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.88, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.565, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.457, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.807, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.454, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.154, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.232, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.565, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.565, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.457, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.478, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.478, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.148, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.148, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 31}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "33e8fdb952b544a9b2e83edb3b7ce9a9", "name": "India 2012 local (overnight india-uttar-pradesh-2012-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2012, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Uttar_Pradesh/Uttar_Pradesh_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"BSP": "BSP", "INC": "INC", "SP": "SP", "BJP": "BJP", "CPI": "CPI", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "MD": "MD", "RUC": "RUC", "ABHM": "ABHM", "NCP": "NCP", "VAJP": "VAJP", "RLM": "RLM", "LD": "LD", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "Independent_2_3": "Independent_2_3", "SHS": "SHS", "PECP": "PECP", "BRVP": "BRVP", "LJP": "LJP", "RJSWP": "RJSWP", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "BSP_A": "BSP_A", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "Independent_3_3": "Independent_3_3", "Independent_3_4": "Independent_3_4", "RVLP": "RVLP", "JaKP": "JaKP", "RPI_A": "RPI_A", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "Independent_4_4": "Independent_4_4", "AITC": "AITC", "Independent_4_5": "Independent_4_5", "Independent_4_6": "Independent_4_6", "RKSP": "RKSP", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "Independent_5_2": "Independent_5_2", "Independent_5_3": "Independent_5_3", "Independent_5_4": "Independent_5_4", "Independent_5_5": "Independent_5_5", "RMD": "RMD", "RLNP": "RLNP", "SDPI": "SDPI", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "Independent_7_2": "Independent_7_2", "ASP": "ASP", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "BhVSP": "BhVSP", "Independent_8_3": "Independent_8_3", "Independent_8_4": "Independent_8_4", "JD_U": "JD_U", "Independent_8_5": "Independent_8_5", "RLD": "RLD", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "JLKP": "JLKP", "AIRSP": "AIRSP", "IJP": "IJP", "MKUP": "MKUP", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "Independent_10_3": "Independent_10_3", "Independent_10_4": "Independent_10_4", "Independent_10_5": "Independent_10_5", "Independent_10_6": "Independent_10_6", "Independent_10_7": "Independent_10_7", "RPD": "RPD", "Independent_10_8": "Independent_10_8", "VIP": "VIP", "Independent_10_9": "Independent_10_9", "Independent_10_10": "Independent_10_10", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "RMGP": "RMGP", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "Independent_12_3": "Independent_12_3", "NLP": "NLP", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "Independent_14_3": "Independent_14_3", "Independent_14_4": "Independent_14_4", "NNP": "NNP", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_15_2": "Independent_15_2", "Independent_15_3": "Independent_15_3", "BSKP": "BSKP", "Independent_15_4": "Independent_15_4", "Independent_15_5": "Independent_15_5", "Independent_15_6": "Independent_15_6", "Independent_15_7": "Independent_15_7", "Independent_15_8": "Independent_15_8", "Independent_15_9": "Independent_15_9", "Independent_15_10": "Independent_15_10", "Independent_15_11": "Independent_15_11", "Independent_15_12": "Independent_15_12", "MUL": "MUL", "Independent_15_13": "Independent_15_13", "JSP": "JSP", "CPM": "CPM", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "Independent_17_3": "Independent_17_3", "Independent_17_4": "Independent_17_4", "RaNP": "RaNP", "SSD": "SSD", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "PHSP": "PHSP", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "ARVP": "ARVP", "Independent_19_3": "Independent_19_3", "Independent_19_4": "Independent_19_4", "ANC": "ANC", "AIMF": "AIMF", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_22_2": "Independent_22_2", "Independent_22_3": "Independent_22_3", "Independent_22_4": "Independent_22_4", "Independent_22_5": "Independent_22_5", "Independent_22_6": "Independent_22_6", "Independent_22_7": "Independent_22_7", "Independent_22_8": "Independent_22_8", "Independent_22_9": "Independent_22_9", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_23_2": "Independent_23_2", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "RSMD": "RSMD", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "UKDP": "UKDP", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "Independent_25_4": "Independent_25_4", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "KSJP": "KSJP", "ABML_S": "ABML_S", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "Independent_27_3": "Independent_27_3", "Independent_27_4": "Independent_27_4", "WPOI": "WPOI", "PBSD": "PBSD", "LPSP": "LPSP", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "IEMC": "IEMC", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "JaSD": "JaSD", "Independent_28_4": "Independent_28_4", "SUCI": "SUCI", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "BC": "BC", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "SSAD": "SSAD", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_31_2": "Independent_31_2", "IOP": "IOP", "KiS": "KiS", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_32_3": "Independent_32_3", "Independent_32_4": "Independent_32_4", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "MNDP": "MNDP", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "RSBP": "RSBP", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "Independent_35_2": "Independent_35_2", "Independent_35_3": "Independent_35_3", "Independent_35_4": "Independent_35_4", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "LPI_V": "LPI_V", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_36_3": "Independent_36_3", "Independent_36_4": "Independent_36_4", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "IUML": "IUML", "JKM": "JKM", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_39_2": "Independent_39_2", "IVD": "IVD", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "Aa_S_P": "Aa_S_P", "NBEP": "NBEP", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_43_2": "Independent_43_2", "Independent_43_3": "Independent_43_3", "Independent_43_4": "Independent_43_4", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "Independent_44_3": "Independent_44_3", "NYP": "NYP", "Independent_44_4": "Independent_44_4", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "BhJD": "BhJD", "RAJP": "RAJP", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "Independent_46_3": "Independent_46_3", "Independent_46_4": "Independent_46_4", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "Independent_47_3": "Independent_47_3", "Independent_47_4": "Independent_47_4", "Independent_47_5": "Independent_47_5", "Independent_47_6": "Independent_47_6", "Independent_47_7": "Independent_47_7", "Independent_47_8": "Independent_47_8", "Independent_47_9": "Independent_47_9", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_48_2": "Independent_48_2", "Independent_48_3": "Independent_48_3", "Independent_48_4": "Independent_48_4", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "Independent_49_3": "Independent_49_3", "Independent_49_4": "Independent_49_4", "Independent_49_5": "Independent_49_5", "ABLTP": "ABLTP", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "Independent_52_3": "Independent_52_3", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "Independent_53_2": "Independent_53_2", "Independent_53_3": "Independent_53_3", "BJVP": "BJVP", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_54_3": "Independent_54_3", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_55_2": "Independent_55_2", "Independent_55_3": "Independent_55_3", "HND": "HND", "Independent_55_4": "Independent_55_4", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_56_2": "Independent_56_2", "Independent_56_3": "Independent_56_3", "Independent_56_4": "Independent_56_4", "Independent_56_5": "Independent_56_5", "RJTP": "RJTP", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_57_2": "Independent_57_2", "BMKCP": "BMKCP", "Independent_58_1": "Independent_58_1", "Independent_58_2": "Independent_58_2", "Independent_58_3": "Independent_58_3", "Independent_58_4": "Independent_58_4", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "SJP_R": "SJP_R", "Independent_60_3": "Independent_60_3", "Independent_60_4": "Independent_60_4", "Independent_60_5": "Independent_60_5", "BHSVP": "BHSVP", "LSP": "LSP", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "JMBP": "JMBP", "JASP": "JASP", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "CPI_ML_L": "CPI_ML_L", "RtrJP": "RtrJP", "Independent_61_3": "Independent_61_3", "Independent_61_4": "Independent_61_4", "Independent_61_5": "Independent_61_5", "Independent_61_6": "Independent_61_6", "JKNPP": "JKNPP", "Independent_61_7": "Independent_61_7", "Independent_61_8": "Independent_61_8", "Independent_61_9": "Independent_61_9", "Independent_61_10": "Independent_61_10", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_62_3": "Independent_62_3", "Independent_62_4": "Independent_62_4", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "RJAP": "RJAP", "BRAVP": "BRAVP", "Independent_63_3": "Independent_63_3", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_64_2": "Independent_64_2", "Independent_64_3": "Independent_64_3", "Independent_64_4": "Independent_64_4", "Independent_64_5": "Independent_64_5", "Independent_64_6": "Independent_64_6", "Independent_64_7": "Independent_64_7", "Independent_64_8": "Independent_64_8", "Independent_64_9": "Independent_64_9", "Independent_64_10": "Independent_64_10", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_65_2": "Independent_65_2", "Independent_65_3": "Independent_65_3", "Independent_65_4": "Independent_65_4", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_66_2": "Independent_66_2", "Independent_67_1": "Independent_67_1", "Independent_67_2": "Independent_67_2", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "Independent_68_3": "Independent_68_3", "Independent_68_4": "Independent_68_4", "Independent_68_5": "Independent_68_5", "Independent_68_6": "Independent_68_6", "Independent_68_7": "Independent_68_7", "Independent_68_8": "Independent_68_8", "Independent_68_9": "Independent_68_9", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_69_3": "Independent_69_3", "Independent_69_4": "Independent_69_4", "PrDP": "PrDP", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "RtJP": "RtJP", "Independent_70_2": "Independent_70_2", "AWD": "AWD", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_72_2": "Independent_72_2", "QED": "QED", "Independent_72_3": "Independent_72_3", "Independent_72_4": "Independent_72_4", "Independent_72_5": "Independent_72_5", "Independent_72_6": "Independent_72_6", "RSD": "RSD", "Independent_72_7": "Independent_72_7", "A_S_P": "A_S_P", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "Independent_73_3": "Independent_73_3", "Independent_73_4": "Independent_73_4", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_74_2": "Independent_74_2", "LP_S": "LP_S", "Independent_74_3": "Independent_74_3", "Independent_74_4": "Independent_74_4", "Independent_74_5": "Independent_74_5", "Independent_74_6": "Independent_74_6", "Independent_74_7": "Independent_74_7", "Independent_74_8": "Independent_74_8", "Independent_74_9": "Independent_74_9", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_75_2": "Independent_75_2", "Independent_75_3": "Independent_75_3", "Independent_75_4": "Independent_75_4", "Independent_75_5": "Independent_75_5", "SNP": "SNP", "RSPS": "RSPS", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_76_3": "Independent_76_3", "Independent_76_4": "Independent_76_4", "Independent_76_5": "Independent_76_5", "Independent_76_6": "Independent_76_6", "Independent_76_7": "Independent_76_7", "Independent_76_8": "Independent_76_8", "Independent_76_9": "Independent_76_9", "IPP": "IPP", "Independent_76_10": "Independent_76_10", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_77_2": "Independent_77_2", "Independent_77_3": "Independent_77_3", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_78_2": "Independent_78_2", "Independent_78_3": "Independent_78_3", "Independent_78_4": "Independent_78_4", "Independent_79_1": "Independent_79_1", "Independent_79_2": "Independent_79_2", "Independent_79_3": "Independent_79_3", "Independent_79_4": "Independent_79_4", "Independent_79_5": "Independent_79_5", "Independent_79_6": "Independent_79_6", "AP": "AP", "Independent_79_7": "Independent_79_7", "Independent_79_8": "Independent_79_8", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_80_2": "Independent_80_2", "Independent_80_3": "Independent_80_3", "Independent_80_4": "Independent_80_4", "Independent_80_5": "Independent_80_5", "Independent_80_6": "Independent_80_6", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "Independent_81_2": "Independent_81_2", "Independent_81_3": "Independent_81_3", "Independent_81_4": "Independent_81_4", "Independent_81_5": "Independent_81_5", "Independent_82_1": "Independent_82_1", "Independent_82_2": "Independent_82_2", "RND": "RND", "Independent_82_3": "Independent_82_3", "Independent_82_4": "Independent_82_4", "Independent_82_5": "Independent_82_5", "Independent_82_6": "Independent_82_6", "Independent_82_7": "Independent_82_7", "Independent_82_8": "Independent_82_8", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_83_2": "Independent_83_2", "Independent_83_3": "Independent_83_3", "RALP": "RALP", "Independent_83_4": "Independent_83_4", "BSP_K": "BSP_K", "Independent_84_1": "Independent_84_1", "Independent_84_2": "Independent_84_2", "Independent_84_3": "Independent_84_3", "Independent_84_4": "Independent_84_4", "Independent_84_5": "Independent_84_5", "Independent_84_6": "Independent_84_6", "Independent_84_7": "Independent_84_7", "Independent_84_8": "Independent_84_8", "Independent_84_9": "Independent_84_9", "Independent_84_10": "Independent_84_10", "Independent_84_11": "Independent_84_11", "Independent_84_12": "Independent_84_12", "Independent_85_1": "Independent_85_1", "Independent_85_2": "Independent_85_2", "Independent_85_3": "Independent_85_3", "Independent_86_1": "Independent_86_1", "Independent_86_2": "Independent_86_2", "Independent_86_3": "Independent_86_3", "Independent_86_4": "Independent_86_4", "Independent_86_5": "Independent_86_5", "Independent_87_1": "Independent_87_1", "Independent_87_2": "Independent_87_2", "Independent_87_3": "Independent_87_3", "Independent_87_4": "Independent_87_4", "Independent_87_5": "Independent_87_5", "Independent_88_1": "Independent_88_1", "Independent_88_2": "Independent_88_2", "Independent_88_3": "Independent_88_3", "Independent_88_4": "Independent_88_4", "Independent_88_5": "Independent_88_5", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_89_2": "Independent_89_2", "Independent_89_3": "Independent_89_3", "Independent_89_4": "Independent_89_4", "Independent_89_5": "Independent_89_5", "BRKD": "BRKD", "Independent_89_6": "Independent_89_6", "Independent_90_1": "Independent_90_1", "Independent_90_2": "Independent_90_2", "Independent_90_3": "Independent_90_3", "Independent_90_4": "Independent_90_4", "Independent_91_1": "Independent_91_1", "JBSP": "JBSP", "JPS": "JPS", "Independent_92_1": "Independent_92_1", "Independent_92_2": "Independent_92_2", "Independent_92_3": "Independent_92_3", "Independent_92_4": "Independent_92_4", "Independent_94_1": "Independent_94_1", "Independent_94_2": "Independent_94_2", "RAJUP": "RAJUP", "Independent_94_3": "Independent_94_3", "Independent_94_4": "Independent_94_4", "Independent_94_5": "Independent_94_5", "Independent_94_6": "Independent_94_6", "Independent_95_1": "Independent_95_1", "Independent_95_2": "Independent_95_2", "Independent_95_3": "Independent_95_3", "Independent_95_4": "Independent_95_4", "BKPP": "BKPP", "Independent_95_5": "Independent_95_5", "Independent_96_1": "Independent_96_1", "Independent_96_2": "Independent_96_2", "Independent_97_1": "Independent_97_1", "Independent_97_2": "Independent_97_2", "MADP": "MADP", "Independent_97_3": "Independent_97_3", "RJPK": "RJPK", "Independent_98_1": "Independent_98_1", "Independent_98_2": "Independent_98_2", "Independent_98_3": "Independent_98_3", "Independent_98_4": "Independent_98_4", "Independent_98_5": "Independent_98_5", "Independent_98_6": "Independent_98_6", "Independent_98_7": "Independent_98_7", "Independent_99_1": "Independent_99_1", "Independent_99_2": "Independent_99_2", "Independent_99_3": "Independent_99_3", "Independent_99_4": "Independent_99_4", "Independent_99_5": "Independent_99_5", "Independent_99_6": "Independent_99_6", "Independent_99_7": "Independent_99_7", "Independent_99_8": "Independent_99_8", "Independent_99_9": "Independent_99_9", "Independent_99_10": "Independent_99_10", "Independent_99_11": "Independent_99_11", "Independent_99_12": "Independent_99_12", "Independent_99_13": "Independent_99_13", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_100_2": "Independent_100_2", "RBP": "RBP", "RSUPRP": "RSUPRP", "Independent_101_1": "Independent_101_1", "Independent_101_2": "Independent_101_2", "Independent_101_3": "Independent_101_3", "Independent_101_4": "Independent_101_4", "Independent_102_1": "Independent_102_1", "Independent_102_2": "Independent_102_2", "Independent_102_3": "Independent_102_3", "Independent_102_4": "Independent_102_4", "Independent_102_5": "Independent_102_5", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_103_2": "Independent_103_2", "Independent_103_3": "Independent_103_3", "Independent_103_4": "Independent_103_4", "Independent_103_5": "Independent_103_5", "Independent_104_1": "Independent_104_1", "Independent_104_2": "Independent_104_2", "Independent_105_1": "Independent_105_1", "Independent_105_2": "Independent_105_2", "Independent_105_3": "Independent_105_3", "Independent_105_4": "Independent_105_4", "Independent_105_5": "Independent_105_5", "Independent_106_1": "Independent_106_1", "Independent_106_2": "Independent_106_2", "Independent_107_1": "Independent_107_1", "Independent_107_2": "Independent_107_2", "Independent_107_3": "Independent_107_3", "Independent_107_4": "Independent_107_4", "JD_S": "JD_S", "Independent_108_1": "Independent_108_1", "NAP": "NAP", "Independent_110_1": "Independent_110_1", "Independent_110_2": "Independent_110_2", "Independent_110_3": "Independent_110_3", "Independent_110_4": "Independent_110_4", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "KrSaP": "KrSaP", "Independent_112_1": "Independent_112_1", "Independent_112_2": "Independent_112_2", "Independent_112_3": "Independent_112_3", "Independent_113_1": "Independent_113_1", "Independent_114_1": "Independent_114_1", "Independent_114_2": "Independent_114_2", "AD": "AD", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_115_2": "Independent_115_2", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "Independent_116_2": "Independent_116_2", "Independent_116_3": "Independent_116_3", "Independent_118_1": "Independent_118_1", "Independent_119_1": "Independent_119_1", "Independent_119_2": "Independent_119_2", "Independent_119_3": "Independent_119_3", "Independent_119_4": "Independent_119_4", "BKrD": "BKrD", "Independent_120_1": "Independent_120_1", "Independent_121_1": "Independent_121_1", "Independent_121_2": "Independent_121_2", "Independent_122_1": "Independent_122_1", "Independent_123_1": "Independent_123_1", "Independent_123_2": "Independent_123_2", "Independent_123_3": "Independent_123_3", "Independent_123_4": "Independent_123_4", "NP": "NP", "Independent_123_5": "Independent_123_5", "Independent_123_6": "Independent_123_6", "JSMP": "JSMP", "Independent_124_1": "Independent_124_1", "Independent_124_2": "Independent_124_2", "Independent_124_3": "Independent_124_3", "Independent_125_1": "Independent_125_1", "Independent_125_2": "Independent_125_2", "SP_I": "SP_I", "Independent_125_3": "Independent_125_3", "Independent_125_4": "Independent_125_4", "Independent_126_1": "Independent_126_1", "Independent_126_2": "Independent_126_2", "Independent_126_3": "Independent_126_3", "Independent_126_4": "Independent_126_4", "Independent_126_5": "Independent_126_5", "Independent_126_6": "Independent_126_6", "Independent_126_7": "Independent_126_7", "Independent_127_1": "Independent_127_1", "Independent_127_2": "Independent_127_2", "Independent_127_3": "Independent_127_3", "GMM": "GMM", "Independent_128_1": "Independent_128_1", "Independent_128_2": "Independent_128_2", "AIFB": "AIFB", "BSRD": "BSRD", "Independent_128_3": "Independent_128_3", "Independent_129_1": "Independent_129_1", "Independent_129_2": "Independent_129_2", "Independent_129_3": "Independent_129_3", "Independent_129_4": "Independent_129_4", "Independent_130_1": "Independent_130_1", "Independent_130_2": "Independent_130_2", "Independent_131_1": "Independent_131_1", "Independent_131_2": "Independent_131_2", "Independent_131_3": "Independent_131_3", "Independent_131_4": "Independent_131_4", "Independent_131_5": "Independent_131_5", "Independent_131_6": "Independent_131_6", "Independent_131_7": "Independent_131_7", "Independent_132_1": "Independent_132_1", "Independent_132_2": "Independent_132_2", "Independent_133_1": "Independent_133_1", "Independent_133_2": "Independent_133_2", "Independent_133_3": "Independent_133_3", "BSKD": "BSKD", "NSCBRP": "NSCBRP", "VP": "VP", "Independent_135_1": "Independent_135_1", "Independent_135_2": "Independent_135_2", "Independent_135_3": "Independent_135_3", "Independent_135_4": "Independent_135_4", "Independent_135_5": "Independent_135_5", "Independent_135_6": "Independent_135_6", "ABDBM": "ABDBM", "Independent_136_1": "Independent_136_1", "Independent_136_2": "Independent_136_2", "Independent_137_1": "Independent_137_1", "PaPOI": "PaPOI", "Independent_137_2": "Independent_137_2", "Independent_138_1": "Independent_138_1", "Independent_138_2": "Independent_138_2", "Independent_138_3": "Independent_138_3", "Independent_139_1": "Independent_139_1", "Independent_139_2": "Independent_139_2", "Independent_140_1": "Independent_140_1", "Independent_140_2": "Independent_140_2", "Independent_140_3": "Independent_140_3", "Independent_140_4": "Independent_140_4", "Independent_140_5": "Independent_140_5", "Independent_141_1": "Independent_141_1", "Independent_141_2": "Independent_141_2", "Independent_142_1": "Independent_142_1", "Independent_142_2": "Independent_142_2", "Independent_143_1": "Independent_143_1", "Independent_143_2": "Independent_143_2", "Independent_143_3": "Independent_143_3", "Independent_144_1": "Independent_144_1", "Independent_144_2": "Independent_144_2", "Independent_144_3": "Independent_144_3", "Independent_144_4": "Independent_144_4", "BKD": "BKD", "Independent_144_5": "Independent_144_5", "Independent_144_6": "Independent_144_6", "Independent_146_1": "Independent_146_1", "Independent_146_2": "Independent_146_2", "Independent_146_3": "Independent_146_3", "Independent_146_4": "Independent_146_4", "Independent_146_5": "Independent_146_5", "Independent_148_1": "Independent_148_1", "Independent_149_1": "Independent_149_1", "Independent_149_2": "Independent_149_2", "Independent_149_3": "Independent_149_3", "Independent_149_4": "Independent_149_4", "Independent_149_5": "Independent_149_5", "Independent_150_1": "Independent_150_1", "Independent_150_2": "Independent_150_2", "Independent_150_3": "Independent_150_3", "Independent_150_4": "Independent_150_4", "RCP": "RCP", "Independent_150_5": "Independent_150_5", "Independent_152_1": "Independent_152_1", "Independent_152_2": "Independent_152_2", "Independent_153_1": "Independent_153_1", "Independent_153_2": "Independent_153_2", "Independent_153_3": "Independent_153_3", "MwSP": "MwSP", "Independent_154_1": "Independent_154_1", "Independent_154_2": "Independent_154_2", "Independent_154_3": "Independent_154_3", "Independent_154_4": "Independent_154_4", "Independent_154_5": "Independent_154_5", "Independent_154_6": "Independent_154_6", "Independent_155_1": "Independent_155_1", "Independent_155_2": "Independent_155_2", "Independent_155_3": "Independent_155_3", "Independent_155_4": "Independent_155_4", "Independent_156_1": "Independent_156_1", "Independent_156_2": "Independent_156_2", "Independent_156_3": "Independent_156_3", "Independent_156_4": "Independent_156_4", "Independent_156_5": "Independent_156_5", "Independent_157_1": "Independent_157_1", "Independent_157_2": "Independent_157_2", "Independent_157_3": "Independent_157_3", "Independent_157_4": "Independent_157_4", "Independent_157_5": "Independent_157_5", "Independent_158_1": "Independent_158_1", "Independent_158_2": "Independent_158_2", "Independent_158_3": "Independent_158_3", "RPI": "RPI", "Independent_158_4": "Independent_158_4", "Independent_159_1": "Independent_159_1", "Independent_159_2": "Independent_159_2", "Independent_159_3": "Independent_159_3", "Independent_160_1": "Independent_160_1", "Independent_160_2": "Independent_160_2", "Independent_160_3": "Independent_160_3", "Independent_160_4": "Independent_160_4", "Independent_160_5": "Independent_160_5", "Independent_160_6": "Independent_160_6", "Independent_161_1": "Independent_161_1", "Independent_161_2": "Independent_161_2", "Independent_161_3": "Independent_161_3", "Independent_161_4": "Independent_161_4", "Independent_161_5": "Independent_161_5", "Independent_162_1": "Independent_162_1", "Independent_162_2": "Independent_162_2", "Independent_162_3": "Independent_162_3", "Independent_163_1": "Independent_163_1", "Independent_163_2": "Independent_163_2", "Independent_163_3": "Independent_163_3", "RJD": "RJD", "Independent_164_1": "Independent_164_1", "Independent_165_1": "Independent_165_1", "Independent_165_2": "Independent_165_2", "Independent_165_3": "Independent_165_3", "Independent_165_4": "Independent_165_4", "Independent_165_5": "Independent_165_5", "Independent_165_6": "Independent_165_6", "Independent_166_1": "Independent_166_1", "Independent_166_2": "Independent_166_2", "Independent_166_3": "Independent_166_3", "Independent_167_1": "Independent_167_1", "ABAS": "ABAS", "Independent_168_1": "Independent_168_1", "Independent_168_2": "Independent_168_2", "Independent_168_3": "Independent_168_3", "Independent_168_4": "Independent_168_4", "Independent_168_5": "Independent_168_5", "Independent_169_1": "Independent_169_1", "Independent_169_2": "Independent_169_2", "Independent_169_3": "Independent_169_3", "Independent_169_4": "Independent_169_4", "Independent_169_5": "Independent_169_5", "Independent_169_6": "Independent_169_6", "Independent_169_7": "Independent_169_7", "Independent_170_1": "Independent_170_1", "Independent_170_2": "Independent_170_2", "Independent_170_3": "Independent_170_3", "Independent_170_4": "Independent_170_4", "Independent_170_5": "Independent_170_5", "Independent_170_6": "Independent_170_6", "Independent_170_7": "Independent_170_7", "Independent_170_8": "Independent_170_8", "BKRP": "BKRP", "Independent_170_9": "Independent_170_9", "Independent_171_1": "Independent_171_1", "Independent_171_2": "Independent_171_2", "Independent_171_3": "Independent_171_3", "Independent_171_4": "Independent_171_4", "BJKD": "BJKD", "Independent_171_5": "Independent_171_5", "Independent_171_6": "Independent_171_6", "BCP": "BCP", "Independent_171_7": "Independent_171_7", "Independent_171_8": "Independent_171_8", "Independent_172_1": "Independent_172_1", "AlHP": "AlHP", "Independent_172_2": "Independent_172_2", "Independent_172_3": "Independent_172_3", "Independent_172_4": "Independent_172_4", "Independent_172_5": "Independent_172_5", "BhJaSaP": "BhJaSaP", "Independent_173_1": "Independent_173_1", "Independent_173_2": "Independent_173_2", "Independent_173_3": "Independent_173_3", "Independent_173_4": "Independent_173_4", "Independent_173_5": "Independent_173_5", "Independent_173_6": "Independent_173_6", "SWPI": "SWPI", "KiRP": "KiRP", "Independent_173_7": "Independent_173_7", "Independent_173_8": "Independent_173_8", "Independent_173_9": "Independent_173_9", "INL": "INL", "Independent_174_1": "Independent_174_1", "Independent_174_2": "Independent_174_2", "Independent_174_3": "Independent_174_3", "Independent_175_1": "Independent_175_1", "Independent_175_2": "Independent_175_2", "Independent_175_3": "Independent_175_3", "Independent_175_4": "Independent_175_4", "Independent_175_5": "Independent_175_5", "Independent_175_6": "Independent_175_6", "Independent_175_7": "Independent_175_7", "Independent_175_8": "Independent_175_8", "Independent_175_9": "Independent_175_9", "Independent_175_10": "Independent_175_10", "Independent_177_1": "Independent_177_1", "BRABSVP": "BRABSVP", "Independent_178_1": "Independent_178_1", "Independent_178_2": "Independent_178_2", "Independent_178_3": "Independent_178_3", "RaIP": "RaIP", "Independent_179_1": "Independent_179_1", "MBCOI": "MBCOI", "PMSP": "PMSP", "Independent_179_2": "Independent_179_2", "Independent_179_3": "Independent_179_3", "Independent_180_1": "Independent_180_1", "Independent_180_2": "Independent_180_2", "Independent_180_3": "Independent_180_3", "Independent_180_4": "Independent_180_4", "Independent_180_5": "Independent_180_5", "NJC": "NJC", "Independent_181_1": "Independent_181_1", "Independent_182_1": "Independent_182_1", "Independent_182_2": "Independent_182_2", "Independent_182_3": "Independent_182_3", "Independent_183_1": "Independent_183_1", "Independent_183_2": "Independent_183_2", "Independent_183_3": "Independent_183_3", "Independent_183_4": "Independent_183_4", "Independent_184_1": "Independent_184_1", "Independent_184_2": "Independent_184_2", "Independent_184_3": "Independent_184_3", "Independent_185_1": "Independent_185_1", "Independent_185_2": "Independent_185_2", "BPNP": "BPNP", "Independent_185_3": "Independent_185_3", "RaMSP": "RaMSP", "Independent_185_4": "Independent_185_4", "BRPP": "BRPP", "Independent_185_5": "Independent_185_5", "Independent_185_6": "Independent_185_6", "HD": "HD", "Independent_185_7": "Independent_185_7", "Independent_185_8": "Independent_185_8", "Independent_186_1": "Independent_186_1", "Independent_186_2": "Independent_186_2", "Independent_186_3": "Independent_186_3", "Independent_187_1": "Independent_187_1", "Independent_187_2": "Independent_187_2", "Independent_187_3": "Independent_187_3", "Independent_187_4": "Independent_187_4", "Independent_188_1": "Independent_188_1", "Independent_188_2": "Independent_188_2", "Independent_188_3": "Independent_188_3", "Independent_189_1": "Independent_189_1", "Independent_189_2": "Independent_189_2", "Independent_189_3": "Independent_189_3", "Independent_189_4": "Independent_189_4", "Independent_189_5": "Independent_189_5", "Independent_190_1": "Independent_190_1", "Independent_190_2": "Independent_190_2", "SMBHP": "SMBHP", "Independent_191_1": "Independent_191_1", "Independent_191_2": "Independent_191_2", "Independent_191_3": "Independent_191_3", "Independent_192_1": "Independent_192_1", "Independent_192_2": "Independent_192_2", "Independent_192_3": "Independent_192_3", "Independent_192_4": "Independent_192_4", "BMSKM": "BMSKM", "Independent_193_1": "Independent_193_1", "Independent_193_2": "Independent_193_2", "Independent_193_3": "Independent_193_3", "Independent_193_4": "Independent_193_4", "Independent_193_5": "Independent_193_5", "Independent_193_6": "Independent_193_6", "Independent_193_7": "Independent_193_7", "Independent_194_1": "Independent_194_1", "Independent_194_2": "Independent_194_2", "Independent_194_3": "Independent_194_3", "Independent_194_4": "Independent_194_4", "Independent_194_5": "Independent_194_5", "Independent_194_6": "Independent_194_6", "Independent_194_7": "Independent_194_7", "Independent_194_8": "Independent_194_8", "Independent_195_1": "Independent_195_1", "Independent_195_2": "Independent_195_2", "Independent_195_3": "Independent_195_3", "Independent_195_4": "Independent_195_4", "Independent_195_5": "Independent_195_5", "Independent_195_6": "Independent_195_6", "Independent_196_1": "Independent_196_1", "Independent_196_2": "Independent_196_2", "Independent_196_3": "Independent_196_3", "Independent_196_4": "Independent_196_4", "Independent_196_5": "Independent_196_5", "RPI_D": "RPI_D", "Independent_196_6": "Independent_196_6", "Independent_197_1": "Independent_197_1", "Independent_197_2": "Independent_197_2", "Independent_197_3": "Independent_197_3", "Independent_197_4": "Independent_197_4", "Independent_197_5": "Independent_197_5", "Independent_197_6": "Independent_197_6", "Independent_197_7": "Independent_197_7", "Independent_197_8": "Independent_197_8", "Independent_197_9": "Independent_197_9", "Independent_198_1": "Independent_198_1", "Independent_198_2": "Independent_198_2", "Independent_200_1": "Independent_200_1", "Independent_200_2": "Independent_200_2", "Independent_200_3": "Independent_200_3", "VoP": "VoP", "Independent_202_1": "Independent_202_1", "Independent_203_1": "Independent_203_1", "Independent_203_2": "Independent_203_2", "KMBS": "KMBS", "Independent_204_1": "Independent_204_1", "Independent_205_1": "Independent_205_1", "Independent_206_1": "Independent_206_1", "Independent_206_2": "Independent_206_2", "Independent_206_3": "Independent_206_3", "Independent_207_1": "Independent_207_1", "Independent_207_2": "Independent_207_2", "Independent_207_3": "Independent_207_3", "Independent_207_4": "Independent_207_4", "Independent_207_5": "Independent_207_5", "JaRaP": "JaRaP", "Independent_208_1": "Independent_208_1", "Independent_208_2": "Independent_208_2", "Independent_208_3": "Independent_208_3", "Independent_208_4": "Independent_208_4", "Independent_208_5": "Independent_208_5", "Independent_208_6": "Independent_208_6", "BRM": "BRM", "Independent_208_7": "Independent_208_7", "Independent_209_1": "Independent_209_1", "Independent_209_2": "Independent_209_2", "Independent_209_3": "Independent_209_3", "Independent_209_4": "Independent_209_4", "Independent_209_5": "Independent_209_5", "Independent_209_6": "Independent_209_6", "Independent_209_7": "Independent_209_7", "Independent_210_1": "Independent_210_1", "Independent_210_2": "Independent_210_2", "Independent_210_3": "Independent_210_3", "Independent_210_4": "Independent_210_4", "Independent_210_5": "Independent_210_5", "Independent_210_6": "Independent_210_6", "Independent_210_7": "Independent_210_7", "Independent_210_8": "Independent_210_8", "Independent_210_9": "Independent_210_9", "Independent_210_10": "Independent_210_10", "Independent_211_1": "Independent_211_1", "Independent_211_2": "Independent_211_2", "Independent_211_3": "Independent_211_3", "Independent_211_4": "Independent_211_4", "Independent_211_5": "Independent_211_5", "BPD": "BPD", "Independent_211_6": "Independent_211_6", "Independent_212_1": "Independent_212_1", "Independent_212_2": "Independent_212_2", "Independent_212_3": "Independent_212_3", "RWSP": "RWSP", "Independent_212_4": "Independent_212_4", "LSWP": "LSWP", "Independent_212_5": "Independent_212_5", "Independent_212_6": "Independent_212_6", "Independent_212_7": "Independent_212_7", "Independent_212_8": "Independent_212_8", "Independent_212_9": "Independent_212_9", "Independent_212_10": "Independent_212_10", "Independent_212_11": "Independent_212_11", "Independent_212_12": "Independent_212_12", "Independent_213_1": "Independent_213_1", "Independent_213_2": "Independent_213_2", "Independent_213_3": "Independent_213_3", "Independent_214_1": "Independent_214_1", "Independent_214_2": "Independent_214_2", "Independent_214_3": "Independent_214_3", "Independent_214_4": "Independent_214_4", "Independent_215_1": "Independent_215_1", "Independent_215_2": "Independent_215_2", "Independent_215_3": "Independent_215_3", "Independent_215_4": "Independent_215_4", "ABRS": "ABRS", "Independent_215_5": "Independent_215_5", "Independent_216_1": "Independent_216_1", "Independent_216_2": "Independent_216_2", "Independent_216_3": "Independent_216_3", "UPRP": "UPRP", "Independent_216_4": "Independent_216_4", "Independent_217_1": "Independent_217_1", "Independent_217_2": "Independent_217_2", "Independent_217_3": "Independent_217_3", "Independent_217_4": "Independent_217_4", "Independent_217_5": "Independent_217_5", "Independent_217_6": "Independent_217_6", "Independent_217_7": "Independent_217_7", "Independent_217_8": "Independent_217_8", "Independent_217_9": "Independent_217_9", "Independent_218_1": "Independent_218_1", "Independent_218_2": "Independent_218_2", "Independent_218_3": "Independent_218_3", "Independent_218_4": "Independent_218_4", "Independent_218_5": "Independent_218_5", "Independent_219_1": "Independent_219_1", "Independent_219_2": "Independent_219_2", "Independent_219_3": "Independent_219_3", "Independent_219_4": "Independent_219_4", "Independent_219_5": "Independent_219_5", "Independent_219_6": "Independent_219_6", "Independent_220_1": "Independent_220_1", "Independent_220_2": "Independent_220_2", "Independent_221_1": "Independent_221_1", "Independent_222_1": "Independent_222_1", "Independent_222_2": "Independent_222_2", "Independent_222_3": "Independent_222_3", "Independent_222_4": "Independent_222_4", "Independent_222_5": "Independent_222_5", "Independent_222_6": "Independent_222_6", "Independent_222_7": "Independent_222_7", "BMM": "BMM", "BHAPP": "BHAPP", "Independent_223_1": "Independent_223_1", "Independent_223_2": "Independent_223_2", "Independent_223_3": "Independent_223_3", "Independent_223_4": "Independent_223_4", "Independent_223_5": "Independent_223_5", "Independent_223_6": "Independent_223_6", "PSJP": "PSJP", "Independent_224_1": "Independent_224_1", "Independent_225_1": "Independent_225_1", "Independent_225_2": "Independent_225_2", "Independent_225_3": "Independent_225_3", "Independent_225_4": "Independent_225_4", "Independent_225_5": "Independent_225_5", "Independent_226_1": "Independent_226_1", "Independent_226_2": "Independent_226_2", "Independent_226_3": "Independent_226_3", "Independent_226_4": "Independent_226_4", "Independent_226_5": "Independent_226_5", "Independent_227_1": "Independent_227_1", "Independent_227_2": "Independent_227_2", "Independent_227_3": "Independent_227_3", "Independent_227_4": "Independent_227_4", "Independent_227_5": "Independent_227_5", "Independent_227_6": "Independent_227_6", "Independent_227_7": "Independent_227_7", "Independent_228_1": "Independent_228_1", "Independent_228_2": "Independent_228_2", "Independent_228_3": "Independent_228_3", "DBJ": "DBJ", "Independent_228_4": "Independent_228_4", "Independent_229_1": "Independent_229_1", "Independent_229_2": "Independent_229_2", "Independent_229_3": "Independent_229_3", "Independent_229_4": "Independent_229_4", "Independent_229_5": "Independent_229_5", "Independent_230_1": "Independent_230_1", "Independent_230_2": "Independent_230_2", "Independent_231_1": "Independent_231_1", "Independent_231_2": "Independent_231_2", "Independent_231_3": "Independent_231_3", "Independent_231_4": "Independent_231_4", "Independent_231_5": "Independent_231_5", "Independent_232_1": "Independent_232_1", "Independent_232_2": "Independent_232_2", "Independent_232_3": "Independent_232_3", "Independent_232_4": "Independent_232_4", "Independent_233_1": "Independent_233_1", "Independent_233_2": "Independent_233_2", "Independent_233_3": "Independent_233_3", "Independent_234_1": "Independent_234_1", "Independent_234_2": "Independent_234_2", "Independent_234_3": "Independent_234_3", "Independent_235_1": "Independent_235_1", "Independent_235_2": "Independent_235_2", "Independent_236_1": "Independent_236_1", "Independent_236_2": "Independent_236_2", "Independent_236_3": "Independent_236_3", "Independent_236_4": "Independent_236_4", "Independent_236_5": "Independent_236_5", "Independent_236_6": "Independent_236_6", "Independent_237_1": "Independent_237_1", "Independent_237_2": "Independent_237_2", "Independent_237_3": "Independent_237_3", "Independent_237_4": "Independent_237_4", "Independent_237_5": "Independent_237_5", "Independent_237_6": "Independent_237_6", "Independent_237_7": "Independent_237_7", "Independent_237_8": "Independent_237_8", "RsAD": "RsAD", "Independent_237_9": "Independent_237_9", "Independent_237_10": "Independent_237_10", "Independent_237_11": "Independent_237_11", "Independent_237_12": "Independent_237_12", "Independent_238_1": "Independent_238_1", "Independent_238_2": "Independent_238_2", "Independent_239_1": "Independent_239_1", "Independent_239_2": "Independent_239_2", "Independent_239_3": "Independent_239_3", "Independent_239_4": "Independent_239_4", "Independent_240_1": "Independent_240_1", "Independent_240_2": "Independent_240_2", "Independent_240_3": "Independent_240_3", "Independent_240_4": "Independent_240_4", "Independent_240_5": "Independent_240_5", "RDHP": "RDHP", "Independent_240_6": "Independent_240_6", "Independent_241_1": "Independent_241_1", "Independent_241_2": "Independent_241_2", "Independent_241_3": "Independent_241_3", "Independent_241_4": "Independent_241_4", "Independent_243_1": "Independent_243_1", "Independent_243_2": "Independent_243_2", "Independent_244_1": "Independent_244_1", "Independent_244_2": "Independent_244_2", "Independent_244_3": "Independent_244_3", "Independent_245_1": "Independent_245_1", "Independent_245_2": "Independent_245_2", "Independent_245_3": "Independent_245_3", "Independent_246_1": "Independent_246_1", "Independent_246_2": "Independent_246_2", "Independent_246_3": "Independent_246_3", "Independent_246_4": "Independent_246_4", "RBHP": "RBHP", "Independent_247_1": "Independent_247_1", "Independent_247_2": "Independent_247_2", "Independent_247_3": "Independent_247_3", "JMM": "JMM", "Independent_247_4": "Independent_247_4", "MC": "MC", "JaBhP": "JaBhP", "Independent_247_5": "Independent_247_5", "Independent_247_6": "Independent_247_6", "Independent_247_7": "Independent_247_7", "Independent_247_8": "Independent_247_8", "Independent_248_1": "Independent_248_1", "Independent_248_2": "Independent_248_2", "JaVM": "JaVM", "MeyP": "MeyP", "Independent_248_3": "Independent_248_3", "Independent_248_4": "Independent_248_4", "Independent_248_5": "Independent_248_5", "Independent_248_6": "Independent_248_6", "YVP": "YVP", "Independent_248_7": "Independent_248_7", "Independent_248_8": "Independent_248_8", "Independent_248_9": "Independent_248_9", "Independent_249_1": "Independent_249_1", "Independent_250_1": "Independent_250_1", "Independent_250_2": "Independent_250_2", "Independent_250_3": "Independent_250_3", "Independent_250_4": "Independent_250_4", "Independent_250_5": "Independent_250_5", "Independent_250_6": "Independent_250_6", "Independent_250_7": "Independent_250_7", "Independent_251_1": "Independent_251_1", "Independent_251_2": "Independent_251_2", "Independent_251_3": "Independent_251_3", "Independent_251_4": "Independent_251_4", "Independent_251_5": "Independent_251_5", "Independent_251_6": "Independent_251_6", "Independent_251_7": "Independent_251_7", "AMKP": "AMKP", "Independent_251_8": "Independent_251_8", "Independent_251_9": "Independent_251_9", "Independent_252_1": "Independent_252_1", "Independent_252_2": "Independent_252_2", "Independent_253_1": "Independent_253_1", "Independent_253_2": "Independent_253_2", "Independent_253_3": "Independent_253_3", "Independent_253_4": "Independent_253_4", "Independent_253_5": "Independent_253_5", "Independent_253_6": "Independent_253_6", "Independent_253_7": "Independent_253_7", "Independent_253_8": "Independent_253_8", "Independent_253_9": "Independent_253_9", "Independent_253_10": "Independent_253_10", "Independent_253_11": "Independent_253_11", "Independent_254_1": "Independent_254_1", "Independent_254_2": "Independent_254_2", "Independent_254_3": "Independent_254_3", "Independent_254_4": "Independent_254_4", "Independent_254_5": "Independent_254_5", "Independent_254_6": "Independent_254_6", "Independent_254_7": "Independent_254_7", "Independent_254_8": "Independent_254_8", "Independent_255_1": "Independent_255_1", "Independent_255_2": "Independent_255_2", "Independent_255_3": "Independent_255_3", "Independent_255_4": "Independent_255_4", "Independent_255_5": "Independent_255_5", "Independent_255_6": "Independent_255_6", "Independent_255_7": "Independent_255_7", "Independent_255_8": "Independent_255_8", "Independent_256_1": "Independent_256_1", "Independent_256_2": "Independent_256_2", "Independent_256_3": "Independent_256_3", "Independent_256_4": "Independent_256_4", "Independent_256_5": "Independent_256_5", "Independent_256_6": "Independent_256_6", "Independent_256_7": "Independent_256_7", "Independent_256_8": "Independent_256_8", "Independent_256_9": "Independent_256_9", "Independent_256_10": "Independent_256_10", "Independent_256_11": "Independent_256_11", "Independent_257_1": "Independent_257_1", "Independent_257_2": "Independent_257_2", "Independent_257_3": "Independent_257_3", "Independent_258_1": "Independent_258_1", "Independent_258_2": "Independent_258_2", "Independent_258_3": "Independent_258_3", "Independent_258_4": "Independent_258_4", "Independent_259_1": "Independent_259_1", "Independent_259_2": "Independent_259_2", "Independent_259_3": "Independent_259_3", "Independent_259_4": "Independent_259_4", "Independent_259_5": "Independent_259_5", "Independent_259_6": "Independent_259_6", "Independent_259_7": "Independent_259_7", "Independent_260_1": "Independent_260_1", "Independent_260_2": "Independent_260_2", "Independent_260_3": "Independent_260_3", "Independent_260_4": "Independent_260_4", "Independent_260_5": "Independent_260_5", "Independent_260_6": "Independent_260_6", "Independent_260_7": "Independent_260_7", "Independent_260_8": "Independent_260_8", "Independent_260_9": "Independent_260_9", "Independent_260_10": "Independent_260_10", "Independent_261_1": "Independent_261_1", "Independent_261_2": "Independent_261_2", "Independent_261_3": "Independent_261_3", "Independent_261_4": "Independent_261_4", "Independent_261_5": "Independent_261_5", "Independent_261_6": "Independent_261_6", "Independent_261_7": "Independent_261_7", "Independent_262_1": "Independent_262_1", "Independent_262_2": "Independent_262_2", "Independent_262_3": "Independent_262_3", "Independent_263_1": "Independent_263_1", "Independent_263_2": "Independent_263_2", "Independent_263_3": "Independent_263_3", "Independent_263_4": "Independent_263_4", "Independent_263_5": "Independent_263_5", "Independent_263_6": "Independent_263_6", "Independent_264_1": "Independent_264_1", "Independent_264_2": "Independent_264_2", "Independent_264_3": "Independent_264_3", "Independent_264_4": "Independent_264_4", "Independent_264_5": "Independent_264_5", "Independent_264_6": "Independent_264_6", "Independent_264_7": "Independent_264_7", "Independent_264_8": "Independent_264_8", "Independent_264_9": "Independent_264_9", "Independent_264_10": "Independent_264_10", "Independent_265_1": "Independent_265_1", "BSA": "BSA", "Independent_265_2": "Independent_265_2", "Independent_266_1": "Independent_266_1", "Independent_266_2": "Independent_266_2", "Independent_266_3": "Independent_266_3", "Independent_266_4": "Independent_266_4", "Independent_266_5": "Independent_266_5", "Independent_266_6": "Independent_266_6", "Independent_266_7": "Independent_266_7", "Independent_267_1": "Independent_267_1", "Independent_267_2": "Independent_267_2", "Independent_267_3": "Independent_267_3", "Independent_267_4": "Independent_267_4", "Independent_267_5": "Independent_267_5", "Independent_267_6": "Independent_267_6", "Independent_268_1": "Independent_268_1", "Independent_268_2": "Independent_268_2", "Independent_268_3": "Independent_268_3", "Independent_268_4": "Independent_268_4", "Independent_268_5": "Independent_268_5", "Independent_268_6": "Independent_268_6", "Independent_268_7": "Independent_268_7", "Independent_268_8": "Independent_268_8", "Independent_268_9": "Independent_268_9", "Independent_268_10": "Independent_268_10", "Independent_268_11": "Independent_268_11", "Independent_269_1": "Independent_269_1", "Independent_269_2": "Independent_269_2", "Independent_269_3": "Independent_269_3", "Independent_269_4": "Independent_269_4", "Independent_270_1": "Independent_270_1", "Independent_270_2": "Independent_270_2", "Independent_270_3": "Independent_270_3", "Independent_270_4": "Independent_270_4", "Independent_272_1": "Independent_272_1", "Independent_272_2": "Independent_272_2", "Independent_273_1": "Independent_273_1", "Independent_274_1": "Independent_274_1", "JND": "JND", "Independent_274_2": "Independent_274_2", "Independent_274_3": "Independent_274_3", "Independent_274_4": "Independent_274_4", "Independent_275_1": "Independent_275_1", "PAP": "PAP", "Independent_275_2": "Independent_275_2", "Independent_275_3": "Independent_275_3", "Independent_275_4": "Independent_275_4", "NRSN": "NRSN", "Independent_275_5": "Independent_275_5", "Independent_275_6": "Independent_275_6", "Independent_276_1": "Independent_276_1", "Independent_276_2": "Independent_276_2", "Independent_276_3": "Independent_276_3", "Independent_276_4": "Independent_276_4", "Independent_277_1": "Independent_277_1", "Independent_277_2": "Independent_277_2", "Independent_277_3": "Independent_277_3", "Independent_277_4": "Independent_277_4", "Independent_277_5": "Independent_277_5", "Independent_277_6": "Independent_277_6", "SBSP": "SBSP", "Independent_278_1": "Independent_278_1", "Independent_278_2": "Independent_278_2", "Independent_278_3": "Independent_278_3", "Independent_279_1": "Independent_279_1", "Independent_279_2": "Independent_279_2", "Independent_280_1": "Independent_280_1", "Independent_280_2": "Independent_280_2", "GSPS": "GSPS", "Independent_281_1": "Independent_281_1", "Independent_281_2": "Independent_281_2", "Independent_281_3": "Independent_281_3", "Independent_281_4": "Independent_281_4", "Independent_281_5": "Independent_281_5", "Independent_282_1": "Independent_282_1", "Independent_282_2": "Independent_282_2", "Independent_282_3": "Independent_282_3", "Independent_283_1": "Independent_283_1", "Independent_283_2": "Independent_283_2", "Independent_283_3": "Independent_283_3", "Independent_283_4": "Independent_283_4", "Independent_283_5": "Independent_283_5", "Independent_283_6": "Independent_283_6", "Independent_283_7": "Independent_283_7", "Independent_284_1": "Independent_284_1", "Independent_284_2": "Independent_284_2", "Independent_284_3": "Independent_284_3", "Independent_284_4": "Independent_284_4", "Independent_285_1": "Independent_285_1", "Independent_285_2": "Independent_285_2", "Independent_285_3": "Independent_285_3", "SHSP": "SHSP", "Independent_286_1": "Independent_286_1", "Independent_287_1": "Independent_287_1", "Independent_287_2": "Independent_287_2", "Independent_287_3": "Independent_287_3", "Independent_287_4": "Independent_287_4", "Independent_287_5": "Independent_287_5", "Independent_287_6": "Independent_287_6", "Independent_287_7": "Independent_287_7", "Independent_288_1": "Independent_288_1", "Independent_288_2": "Independent_288_2", "Independent_288_3": "Independent_288_3", "Independent_288_4": "Independent_288_4", "Independent_288_5": "Independent_288_5", "Independent_288_6": "Independent_288_6", "Independent_289_1": "Independent_289_1", "Independent_289_2": "Independent_289_2", "Independent_289_3": "Independent_289_3", "Independent_289_4": "Independent_289_4", "Independent_289_5": "Independent_289_5", "Independent_289_6": "Independent_289_6", "Independent_290_1": "Independent_290_1", "Independent_290_2": "Independent_290_2", "NDPF": "NDPF", "Independent_290_3": "Independent_290_3", "Independent_291_1": "Independent_291_1", "Independent_291_2": "Independent_291_2", "Independent_291_3": "Independent_291_3", "Independent_291_4": "Independent_291_4", "Independent_291_5": "Independent_291_5", "Independent_291_6": "Independent_291_6", "Independent_291_7": "Independent_291_7", "Independent_291_8": "Independent_291_8", "Independent_291_9": "Independent_291_9", "Independent_291_10": "Independent_291_10", "Independent_291_11": "Independent_291_11", "Independent_292_1": "Independent_292_1", "Independent_292_2": "Independent_292_2", "Independent_292_3": "Independent_292_3", "Independent_292_4": "Independent_292_4", "Independent_292_5": "Independent_292_5", "Independent_292_6": "Independent_292_6", "Independent_293_1": "Independent_293_1", "Independent_293_2": "Independent_293_2", "Independent_293_3": "Independent_293_3", "Independent_293_4": "Independent_293_4", "Independent_293_5": "Independent_293_5", "Independent_294_1": "Independent_294_1", "Independent_294_2": "Independent_294_2", "Independent_295_1": "Independent_295_1", "Independent_295_2": "Independent_295_2", "Independent_295_3": "Independent_295_3", "Independent_295_4": "Independent_295_4", "Independent_296_1": "Independent_296_1", "Independent_296_2": "Independent_296_2", "Independent_296_3": "Independent_296_3", "Independent_296_4": "Independent_296_4", "Independent_296_5": "Independent_296_5", "Independent_297_1": "Independent_297_1", "Independent_297_2": "Independent_297_2", "Independent_297_3": "Independent_297_3", "Independent_297_4": "Independent_297_4", "Independent_297_5": "Independent_297_5", "Independent_297_6": "Independent_297_6", "Independent_298_1": "Independent_298_1", "Independent_298_2": "Independent_298_2", "Independent_298_3": "Independent_298_3", "Independent_298_4": "Independent_298_4", "Independent_298_5": "Independent_298_5", "Independent_298_6": "Independent_298_6", "Independent_298_7": "Independent_298_7", "Independent_299_1": "Independent_299_1", "Independent_299_2": "Independent_299_2", "Independent_299_3": "Independent_299_3", "Independent_300_1": "Independent_300_1", "Independent_300_2": "Independent_300_2", "AMP": "AMP", "Independent_300_3": "Independent_300_3", "Independent_301_1": "Independent_301_1", "Independent_301_2": "Independent_301_2", "Independent_301_3": "Independent_301_3", "Independent_301_4": "Independent_301_4", "Independent_301_5": "Independent_301_5", "Independent_301_6": "Independent_301_6", "Independent_302_1": "Independent_302_1", "Independent_302_2": "Independent_302_2", "Independent_302_3": "Independent_302_3", "BJBCD": "BJBCD", "Independent_302_4": "Independent_302_4", "Independent_302_5": "Independent_302_5", "BEP": "BEP", "Independent_302_6": "Independent_302_6", "Independent_302_7": "Independent_302_7", "SPYSCB": "SPYSCB", "Independent_303_1": "Independent_303_1", "Independent_303_2": "Independent_303_2", "Independent_303_3": "Independent_303_3", "EKSP": "EKSP", "Independent_304_1": "Independent_304_1", "Independent_304_2": "Independent_304_2", "Independent_304_3": "Independent_304_3", "RVNP": "RVNP", "Independent_304_4": "Independent_304_4", "Independent_305_1": "Independent_305_1", "Independent_305_2": "Independent_305_2", "Independent_305_3": "Independent_305_3", "Independent_306_1": "Independent_306_1", "Independent_306_2": "Independent_306_2", "Independent_307_1": "Independent_307_1", "Independent_307_2": "Independent_307_2", "Independent_307_3": "Independent_307_3", "Independent_307_4": "Independent_307_4", "Independent_307_5": "Independent_307_5", "Independent_308_1": "Independent_308_1", "Independent_308_2": "Independent_308_2", "Independent_308_3": "Independent_308_3", "Independent_309_1": "Independent_309_1", "Independent_309_2": "Independent_309_2", "Independent_309_3": "Independent_309_3", "Independent_309_4": "Independent_309_4", "Independent_310_1": "Independent_310_1", "Independent_310_2": "Independent_310_2", "Independent_310_3": "Independent_310_3", "Independent_310_4": "Independent_310_4", "Independent_310_5": "Independent_310_5", "Independent_311_1": "Independent_311_1", "Independent_312_1": "Independent_312_1", "Independent_312_2": "Independent_312_2", "Independent_312_3": "Independent_312_3", "Independent_312_4": "Independent_312_4", "Independent_312_5": "Independent_312_5", "Independent_313_1": "Independent_313_1", "Independent_313_2": "Independent_313_2", "Independent_313_3": "Independent_313_3", "Independent_313_4": "Independent_313_4", "Independent_313_5": "Independent_313_5", "Independent_314_1": "Independent_314_1", "Independent_315_1": "Independent_315_1", "Independent_315_2": "Independent_315_2", "Independent_315_3": "Independent_315_3", "Independent_315_4": "Independent_315_4", "Independent_315_5": "Independent_315_5", "Independent_315_6": "Independent_315_6", "Independent_316_1": "Independent_316_1", "Independent_316_2": "Independent_316_2", "Independent_317_1": "Independent_317_1", "Independent_317_2": "Independent_317_2", "Independent_317_3": "Independent_317_3", "Independent_317_4": "Independent_317_4", "Independent_317_5": "Independent_317_5", "Independent_317_6": "Independent_317_6", "Independent_318_1": "Independent_318_1", "Independent_318_2": "Independent_318_2", "JKiP": "JKiP", "Independent_319_1": "Independent_319_1", "Independent_319_2": "Independent_319_2", "Independent_320_1": "Independent_320_1", "Independent_320_2": "Independent_320_2", "Independent_320_3": "Independent_320_3", "Independent_320_4": "Independent_320_4", "Independent_320_5": "Independent_320_5", "Independent_320_6": "Independent_320_6", "Independent_320_7": "Independent_320_7", "Independent_321_1": "Independent_321_1", "JD": "JD", "Independent_321_2": "Independent_321_2", "Independent_321_3": "Independent_321_3", "Independent_321_4": "Independent_321_4", "Independent_321_5": "Independent_321_5", "Independent_321_6": "Independent_321_6", "Independent_321_7": "Independent_321_7", "SWJP": "SWJP", "Independent_322_1": "Independent_322_1", "Independent_322_2": "Independent_322_2", "Independent_322_3": "Independent_322_3", "Independent_322_4": "Independent_322_4", "Independent_322_5": "Independent_322_5", "Independent_322_6": "Independent_322_6", "Independent_322_7": "Independent_322_7", "MMUP": "MMUP", "Independent_322_8": "Independent_322_8", "Independent_322_9": "Independent_322_9", "Independent_322_10": "Independent_322_10", "Independent_322_11": "Independent_322_11", "Independent_322_12": "Independent_322_12", "Independent_322_13": "Independent_322_13", "SWD": "SWD", "Independent_323_1": "Independent_323_1", "Independent_323_2": "Independent_323_2", "Independent_323_3": "Independent_323_3", "Independent_323_4": "Independent_323_4", "Independent_323_5": "Independent_323_5", "Independent_323_6": "Independent_323_6", "Independent_323_7": "Independent_323_7", "Independent_324_1": "Independent_324_1", "Independent_324_2": "Independent_324_2", "Independent_324_3": "Independent_324_3", "Independent_324_4": "Independent_324_4", "Independent_324_5": "Independent_324_5", "Independent_324_6": "Independent_324_6", "Independent_324_7": "Independent_324_7", "Independent_324_8": "Independent_324_8", "BUM": "BUM", "Independent_324_9": "Independent_324_9", "Independent_324_10": "Independent_324_10", "Independent_325_1": "Independent_325_1", "Independent_325_2": "Independent_325_2", "Independent_325_3": "Independent_325_3", "Independent_325_4": "Independent_325_4", "Independent_326_1": "Independent_326_1", "Independent_326_2": "Independent_326_2", "Independent_326_3": "Independent_326_3", "Independent_326_4": "Independent_326_4", "Independent_326_5": "Independent_326_5", "Independent_326_6": "Independent_326_6", "Independent_326_7": "Independent_326_7", "Independent_326_8": "Independent_326_8", "Independent_326_9": "Independent_326_9", "Independent_326_10": "Independent_326_10", "Independent_326_11": "Independent_326_11", "Independent_326_12": "Independent_326_12", "Independent_326_13": "Independent_326_13", "Independent_326_14": "Independent_326_14", "Independent_326_15": "Independent_326_15", "Independent_326_16": "Independent_326_16", "Independent_326_17": "Independent_326_17", "Independent_326_18": "Independent_326_18", "Independent_327_1": "Independent_327_1", "Independent_327_2": "Independent_327_2", "Independent_327_3": "Independent_327_3", "SSCP": "SSCP", "ABLTC": "ABLTC", "Independent_328_1": "Independent_328_1", "Independent_328_2": "Independent_328_2", "Independent_328_3": "Independent_328_3", "Independent_328_4": "Independent_328_4", "Independent_328_5": "Independent_328_5", "Independent_328_6": "Independent_328_6", "Independent_328_7": "Independent_328_7", "Independent_328_8": "Independent_328_8", "Independent_328_9": "Independent_328_9", "Independent_328_10": "Independent_328_10", "Independent_328_11": "Independent_328_11", "Independent_329_1": "Independent_329_1", "Independent_329_2": "Independent_329_2", "Independent_329_3": "Independent_329_3", "Independent_329_4": "Independent_329_4", "Independent_329_5": "Independent_329_5", "Independent_329_6": "Independent_329_6", "Independent_329_7": "Independent_329_7", "Independent_329_8": "Independent_329_8", "Independent_329_9": "Independent_329_9", "Independent_329_10": "Independent_329_10", "Independent_329_11": "Independent_329_11", "Independent_329_12": "Independent_329_12", "Independent_330_1": "Independent_330_1", "Independent_330_2": "Independent_330_2", "Independent_330_3": "Independent_330_3", "Independent_330_4": "Independent_330_4", "Independent_330_5": "Independent_330_5", "Independent_330_6": "Independent_330_6", "Independent_330_7": "Independent_330_7", "Independent_330_8": "Independent_330_8", "Independent_330_9": "Independent_330_9", "Independent_330_10": "Independent_330_10", "Independent_331_1": "Independent_331_1", "Independent_332_1": "Independent_332_1", "Independent_332_2": "Independent_332_2", "Independent_332_3": "Independent_332_3", "Independent_332_4": "Independent_332_4", "Independent_332_5": "Independent_332_5", "Independent_333_1": "Independent_333_1", "Independent_334_1": "Independent_334_1", "Independent_334_2": "Independent_334_2", "Independent_334_3": "Independent_334_3", "Independent_334_4": "Independent_334_4", "Independent_334_5": "Independent_334_5", "Independent_334_6": "Independent_334_6", "Independent_334_7": "Independent_334_7", "PRBD": "PRBD", "Independent_335_1": "Independent_335_1", "Independent_335_2": "Independent_335_2", "Independent_335_3": "Independent_335_3", "Independent_335_4": "Independent_335_4", "Independent_336_1": "Independent_336_1", "Independent_336_2": "Independent_336_2", "Independent_336_3": "Independent_336_3", "MOP": "MOP", "Independent_337_1": "Independent_337_1", "Independent_337_2": "Independent_337_2", "Independent_337_3": "Independent_337_3", "Independent_337_4": "Independent_337_4", "BhSaPa": "BhSaPa", "Independent_337_5": "Independent_337_5", "Independent_337_6": "Independent_337_6", "AHNP": "AHNP", "Independent_337_7": "Independent_337_7", "Independent_337_8": "Independent_337_8", "Independent_337_9": "Independent_337_9", "Independent_338_1": "Independent_338_1", "Independent_338_2": "Independent_338_2", "Independent_338_3": "Independent_338_3", "Independent_338_4": "Independent_338_4", "Independent_338_5": "Independent_338_5", "Independent_338_6": "Independent_338_6", "Independent_339_1": "Independent_339_1", "Independent_339_2": "Independent_339_2", "Independent_339_3": "Independent_339_3", "APVM": "APVM", "Independent_339_4": "Independent_339_4", "Independent_339_5": "Independent_339_5", "Independent_339_6": "Independent_339_6", "Independent_339_7": "Independent_339_7", "BJS": "BJS", "Independent_339_8": "Independent_339_8", "Independent_340_1": "Independent_340_1", "Independent_340_2": "Independent_340_2", "Independent_340_3": "Independent_340_3", "Independent_340_4": "Independent_340_4", "Independent_340_5": "Independent_340_5", "Independent_341_1": "Independent_341_1", "Independent_341_2": "Independent_341_2", "Independent_341_3": "Independent_341_3", "Independent_341_4": "Independent_341_4", "Independent_341_5": "Independent_341_5", "Independent_342_1": "Independent_342_1", "Independent_342_2": "Independent_342_2", "Independent_342_3": "Independent_342_3", "Independent_342_4": "Independent_342_4", "Independent_342_5": "Independent_342_5", "Independent_342_6": "Independent_342_6", "Independent_343_1": "Independent_343_1", "Independent_343_2": "Independent_343_2", "Independent_343_3": "Independent_343_3", "Independent_343_4": "Independent_343_4", "Independent_344_1": "Independent_344_1", "MOSP": "MOSP", "Independent_344_2": "Independent_344_2", "Independent_345_1": "Independent_345_1", "Independent_346_1": "Independent_346_1", "Independent_346_2": "Independent_346_2", "Independent_346_3": "Independent_346_3", "Independent_346_4": "Independent_346_4", "Independent_346_5": "Independent_346_5", "Independent_347_1": "Independent_347_1", "BhRapa": "BhRapa", "Independent_347_2": "Independent_347_2", "RSVC": "RSVC", "Independent_348_1": "Independent_348_1", "Independent_348_2": "Independent_348_2", "Independent_348_3": "Independent_348_3", "Independent_349_1": "Independent_349_1", "Independent_349_2": "Independent_349_2", "Independent_349_3": "Independent_349_3", "Independent_349_4": "Independent_349_4", "Independent_349_5": "Independent_349_5", "Independent_350_1": "Independent_350_1", "Independent_350_2": "Independent_350_2", "Independent_351_1": "Independent_351_1", "Independent_351_2": "Independent_351_2", "BeCP": "BeCP", "Independent_352_1": "Independent_352_1", "Independent_352_2": "Independent_352_2", "Independent_353_1": "Independent_353_1", "Independent_353_2": "Independent_353_2", "Independent_353_3": "Independent_353_3", "Independent_353_4": "Independent_353_4", "Independent_353_5": "Independent_353_5", "Independent_353_6": "Independent_353_6", "Independent_354_1": "Independent_354_1", "MSP": "MSP", "Independent_354_2": "Independent_354_2", "Independent_354_3": "Independent_354_3", "Independent_355_1": "Independent_355_1", "Independent_355_2": "Independent_355_2", "Independent_356_1": "Independent_356_1", "Independent_356_2": "Independent_356_2", "Independent_356_3": "Independent_356_3", "Independent_356_4": "Independent_356_4", "Independent_356_5": "Independent_356_5", "Independent_357_1": "Independent_357_1", "BSD": "BSD", "Independent_358_1": "Independent_358_1", "Independent_358_2": "Independent_358_2", "Independent_358_3": "Independent_358_3", "Independent_358_4": "Independent_358_4", "Independent_358_5": "Independent_358_5", "Independent_358_6": "Independent_358_6", "Independent_358_7": "Independent_358_7", "Independent_358_8": "Independent_358_8", "Independent_359_1": "Independent_359_1", "Independent_359_2": "Independent_359_2", "RGOP": "RGOP", "Independent_360_1": "Independent_360_1", "Independent_360_2": "Independent_360_2", "Independent_360_3": "Independent_360_3", "Independent_361_1": "Independent_361_1", "Independent_361_2": "Independent_361_2", "Independent_361_3": "Independent_361_3", "Independent_361_4": "Independent_361_4", "Independent_361_5": "Independent_361_5", "Independent_362_1": "Independent_362_1", "Independent_362_2": "Independent_362_2", "Independent_362_3": "Independent_362_3", "Independent_362_4": "Independent_362_4", "Independent_362_5": "Independent_362_5", "Independent_362_6": "Independent_362_6", "Independent_362_7": "Independent_362_7", "Independent_362_8": "Independent_362_8", "Independent_362_9": "Independent_362_9", "Independent_363_1": "Independent_363_1", "Independent_363_2": "Independent_363_2", "Independent_363_3": "Independent_363_3", "Independent_363_4": "Independent_363_4", "Independent_364_1": "Independent_364_1", "Independent_364_2": "Independent_364_2", "Independent_364_3": "Independent_364_3", "Independent_364_4": "Independent_364_4", "Independent_364_5": "Independent_364_5", "Independent_364_6": "Independent_364_6", "Independent_365_1": "Independent_365_1", "BHNKP": "BHNKP", "Independent_366_1": "Independent_366_1", "Independent_366_2": "Independent_366_2", "Independent_366_3": "Independent_366_3", "Independent_366_4": "Independent_366_4", "Independent_366_5": "Independent_366_5", "Independent_366_6": "Independent_366_6", "Independent_367_1": "Independent_367_1", "Independent_367_2": "Independent_367_2", "Independent_368_1": "Independent_368_1", "Independent_368_2": "Independent_368_2", "Independent_369_1": "Independent_369_1", "Independent_369_2": "Independent_369_2", "SaPP": "SaPP", "Independent_370_1": "Independent_370_1", "Independent_370_2": "Independent_370_2", "Independent_371_1": "Independent_371_1", "Independent_371_2": "Independent_371_2", "Independent_371_3": "Independent_371_3", "Independent_371_4": "Independent_371_4", "Independent_371_5": "Independent_371_5", "Independent_372_1": "Independent_372_1", "Independent_372_2": "Independent_372_2", "Independent_372_3": "Independent_372_3", "Independent_373_1": "Independent_373_1", "Independent_373_2": "Independent_373_2", "Independent_373_3": "Independent_373_3", "Independent_373_4": "Independent_373_4", "Independent_373_5": "Independent_373_5", "Independent_374_1": "Independent_374_1", "Independent_374_2": "Independent_374_2", "Independent_375_1": "Independent_375_1", "Independent_375_2": "Independent_375_2", "Independent_375_3": "Independent_375_3", "Independent_375_4": "Independent_375_4", "PSS": "PSS", "Independent_376_1": "Independent_376_1", "Independent_376_2": "Independent_376_2", "Independent_376_3": "Independent_376_3", "Independent_377_1": "Independent_377_1", "Independent_377_2": "Independent_377_2", "Independent_378_1": "Independent_378_1", "Independent_378_2": "Independent_378_2", "Independent_378_3": "Independent_378_3", "Independent_378_4": "Independent_378_4", "Independent_379_1": "Independent_379_1", "Independent_381_1": "Independent_381_1", "Independent_381_2": "Independent_381_2", "Independent_382_1": "Independent_382_1", "Independent_382_2": "Independent_382_2", "Independent_382_3": "Independent_382_3", "Independent_383_1": "Independent_383_1", "Independent_384_1": "Independent_384_1", "Independent_384_2": "Independent_384_2", "Independent_384_3": "Independent_384_3", "Independent_385_1": "Independent_385_1", "Independent_385_2": "Independent_385_2", "Independent_385_3": "Independent_385_3", "RaAD": "RaAD", "Independent_385_4": "Independent_385_4", "Independent_386_1": "Independent_386_1", "Independent_386_2": "Independent_386_2", "Independent_386_3": "Independent_386_3", "Independent_387_1": "Independent_387_1", "Independent_387_2": "Independent_387_2", "Independent_387_3": "Independent_387_3", "Independent_387_4": "Independent_387_4", "Independent_387_5": "Independent_387_5", "Independent_387_6": "Independent_387_6", "Independent_388_1": "Independent_388_1", "Independent_388_2": "Independent_388_2", "Independent_388_3": "Independent_388_3", "Independent_388_4": "Independent_388_4", "Independent_388_5": "Independent_388_5", "SM": "SM", "Independent_388_6": "Independent_388_6", "Independent_388_7": "Independent_388_7", "Independent_388_8": "Independent_388_8", "Independent_388_9": "Independent_388_9", "Independent_388_10": "Independent_388_10", "Independent_388_11": "Independent_388_11", "Independent_389_1": "Independent_389_1", "Independent_389_2": "Independent_389_2", "MaJP": "MaJP", "Independent_390_1": "Independent_390_1", "Independent_390_2": "Independent_390_2", "Independent_390_3": "Independent_390_3", "Independent_390_4": "Independent_390_4", "DSP": "DSP", "Independent_390_5": "Independent_390_5", "Independent_391_1": "Independent_391_1", "Independent_391_2": "Independent_391_2", "Independent_392_1": "Independent_392_1", "Independent_392_2": "Independent_392_2", "Independent_392_3": "Independent_392_3", "Independent_393_1": "Independent_393_1", "Independent_394_1": "Independent_394_1", "Independent_394_2": "Independent_394_2", "Independent_394_3": "Independent_394_3", "Independent_395_1": "Independent_395_1", "Independent_395_2": "Independent_395_2", "SwrJP": "SwrJP", "Independent_396_1": "Independent_396_1", "Independent_396_2": "Independent_396_2", "Independent_396_3": "Independent_396_3", "GASP": "GASP", "Independent_396_4": "Independent_396_4", "Independent_396_5": "Independent_396_5", "Independent_396_6": "Independent_396_6", "Independent_397_1": "Independent_397_1", "Independent_397_2": "Independent_397_2", "Independent_398_1": "Independent_398_1", "Independent_399_1": "Independent_399_1", "Independent_399_2": "Independent_399_2", "BCB": "BCB", "Independent_399_3": "Independent_399_3", "Independent_399_4": "Independent_399_4", "GGP": "GGP", "Independent_399_5": "Independent_399_5", "Independent_400_1": "Independent_400_1", "Independent_400_2": "Independent_400_2", "Independent_400_3": "Independent_400_3", "Independent_400_4": "Independent_400_4", "Independent_400_5": "Independent_400_5", "Independent_401_1": "Independent_401_1", "Independent_401_2": "Independent_401_2", "Independent_401_3": "Independent_401_3", "Independent_401_4": "Independent_401_4", "Independent_401_5": "Independent_401_5", "Independent_401_6": "Independent_401_6", "Independent_401_7": "Independent_401_7", "Independent_401_8": "Independent_401_8", "Independent_401_9": "Independent_401_9", "Independent_401_10": "Independent_401_10", "Independent_401_11": "Independent_401_11", "Independent_401_12": "Independent_401_12", "Independent_402_1": "Independent_402_1", "Independent_402_2": "Independent_402_2", "Independent_402_3": "Independent_402_3", "Independent_402_4": "Independent_402_4", "Independent_402_5": "Independent_402_5", "Independent_402_6": "Independent_402_6", "Independent_402_7": "Independent_402_7", "Independent_402_8": "Independent_402_8", "Independent_402_9": "Independent_402_9", "Independent_402_10": "Independent_402_10", "Independent_402_11": "Independent_402_11", "Independent_402_12": "Independent_402_12", "Independent_403_1": "Independent_403_1", "Independent_403_2": "Independent_403_2", "Independent_403_3": "Independent_403_3", "Independent_403_4": "Independent_403_4"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 403, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 403, "cast_gt_registered": 403}, "n_stations_flagged": 403, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:53:12.987843", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.646, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.666, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.659, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.525, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.444, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.659, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.409, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.409, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.582, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 403}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5ad8987812164e2c976ff545a03f167a", "name": "India 2011 local (overnight india-west-bengal-2011-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2011, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/West_Bengal/West_Bengal_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AIFB": "AIFB", "INC": "INC", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "BJP": "BJP", "BSP": "BSP", "SUCI": "SUCI", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "AMB": "AMB", "AITC": "AITC", "CPM": "CPM", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "RPI": "RPI", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "Independent_3_3": "Independent_3_3", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "Independent_4_4": "Independent_4_4", "PDCI": "PDCI", "JMM": "JMM", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "Independent_6_2": "Independent_6_2", "Independent_6_3": "Independent_6_3", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "NCP": "NCP", "Independent_7_2": "Independent_7_2", "IPFB": "IPFB", "Independent_7_3": "Independent_7_3", "JD_U": "JD_U", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "Independent_9_2": "Independent_9_2", "RSP": "RSP", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "Independent_10_3": "Independent_10_3", "RADP": "RADP", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "CPI_ML_L": "CPI_ML_L", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "Independent_12_3": "Independent_12_3", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "SWJP": "SWJP", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_16_2": "Independent_16_2", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "GOJAM": "GOJAM", "GNLF": "GNLF", "CPI": "CPI", "ABGL": "ABGL", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "KPP": "KPP", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "LJP": "LJP", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "Independent_27_3": "Independent_27_3", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "JDP": "JDP", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_32_3": "Independent_32_3", "Independent_32_4": "Independent_32_4", "Independent_32_5": "Independent_32_5", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "RPI_A": "RPI_A", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_34_3": "Independent_34_3", "Independent_34_4": "Independent_34_4", "Independent_34_5": "Independent_34_5", "Independent_34_6": "Independent_34_6", "SP": "SP", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "Independent_41_3": "Independent_41_3", "Independent_41_4": "Independent_41_4", "Independent_41_5": "Independent_41_5", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_42_2": "Independent_42_2", "Independent_42_3": "Independent_42_3", "Independent_42_4": "Independent_42_4", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_45_2": "Independent_45_2", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_48_2": "Independent_48_2", "Independent_48_3": "Independent_48_3", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "PBRML": "PBRML", "MUL": "MUL", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "IUC": "IUC", "SDPI": "SDPI", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "Independent_60_3": "Independent_60_3", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "IJP": "IJP", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_62_3": "Independent_62_3", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "PDS": "PDS", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_75_2": "Independent_75_2", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_77_2": "Independent_77_2", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_80_2": "Independent_80_2", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "Independent_81_2": "Independent_81_2", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_85_1": "Independent_85_1", "RCPI_R": "RCPI_R", "Independent_88_1": "Independent_88_1", "NSBP": "NSBP", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_94_1": "Independent_94_1", "TRMRPPI": "TRMRPPI", "Independent_97_1": "Independent_97_1", "Independent_97_2": "Independent_97_2", "Independent_99_1": "Independent_99_1", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_100_2": "Independent_100_2", "Independent_101_1": "Independent_101_1", "Independent_101_2": "Independent_101_2", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_104_1": "Independent_104_1", "Independent_104_2": "Independent_104_2", "Independent_105_1": "Independent_105_1", "Independent_105_2": "Independent_105_2", "Independent_106_1": "Independent_106_1", "Independent_106_2": "Independent_106_2", "Independent_108_1": "Independent_108_1", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "Independent_112_1": "Independent_112_1", "Independent_113_1": "Independent_113_1", "IUML": "IUML", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_115_2": "Independent_115_2", "Independent_115_3": "Independent_115_3", "Independent_115_4": "Independent_115_4", "Independent_115_5": "Independent_115_5", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "Independent_117_1": "Independent_117_1", "Independent_117_2": "Independent_117_2", "Independent_117_3": "Independent_117_3", "Independent_117_4": "Independent_117_4", "Independent_119_1": "Independent_119_1", "SAP": "SAP", "Independent_120_1": "Independent_120_1", "Independent_120_2": "Independent_120_2", "Independent_121_1": "Independent_121_1", "Independent_122_1": "Independent_122_1", "Independent_123_1": "Independent_123_1", "Independent_123_2": "Independent_123_2", "Independent_123_3": "Independent_123_3", "Independent_124_1": "Independent_124_1", "AIMF": "AIMF", "Independent_126_1": "Independent_126_1", "RJNP": "RJNP", "Independent_128_1": "Independent_128_1", "Independent_129_1": "Independent_129_1", "Independent_129_2": "Independent_129_2", "Independent_130_1": "Independent_130_1", "Independent_130_2": "Independent_130_2", "Independent_131_1": "Independent_131_1", "Independent_133_1": "Independent_133_1", "Independent_134_1": "Independent_134_1", "Independent_134_2": "Independent_134_2", "Independent_136_1": "Independent_136_1", "Independent_137_1": "Independent_137_1", "Independent_137_2": "Independent_137_2", "Independent_140_1": "Independent_140_1", "Independent_140_2": "Independent_140_2", "Independent_141_1": "Independent_141_1", "Independent_141_2": "Independent_141_2", "Independent_142_1": "Independent_142_1", "Independent_142_2": "Independent_142_2", "Independent_142_3": "Independent_142_3", "Independent_144_1": "Independent_144_1", "Independent_145_1": "Independent_145_1", "Independent_145_2": "Independent_145_2", "Independent_145_3": "Independent_145_3", "Independent_146_1": "Independent_146_1", "Independent_147_1": "Independent_147_1", "Independent_147_2": "Independent_147_2", "PPIS": "PPIS", "Independent_148_1": "Independent_148_1", "Independent_149_1": "Independent_149_1", "Independent_149_2": "Independent_149_2", "Independent_149_3": "Independent_149_3", "Independent_150_1": "Independent_150_1", "Independent_150_2": "Independent_150_2", "Independent_150_3": "Independent_150_3", "Independent_150_4": "Independent_150_4", "Independent_150_5": "Independent_150_5", "Independent_150_6": "Independent_150_6", "Independent_151_1": "Independent_151_1", "Independent_151_2": "Independent_151_2", "Independent_151_3": "Independent_151_3", "Independent_151_4": "Independent_151_4", "Independent_152_1": "Independent_152_1", "Independent_152_2": "Independent_152_2", "Independent_153_1": "Independent_153_1", "Independent_153_2": "Independent_153_2", "Independent_153_3": "Independent_153_3", "Independent_153_4": "Independent_153_4", "Independent_154_1": "Independent_154_1", "Independent_155_1": "Independent_155_1", "Independent_155_2": "Independent_155_2", "Independent_156_1": "Independent_156_1", "Independent_156_2": "Independent_156_2", "Independent_157_1": "Independent_157_1", "Independent_158_1": "Independent_158_1", "Independent_158_2": "Independent_158_2", "Independent_158_3": "Independent_158_3", "Independent_158_4": "Independent_158_4", "Independent_159_1": "Independent_159_1", "Independent_159_2": "Independent_159_2", "Independent_159_3": "Independent_159_3", "Independent_159_4": "Independent_159_4", "Independent_159_5": "Independent_159_5", "Independent_160_1": "Independent_160_1", "Independent_160_2": "Independent_160_2", "Independent_161_1": "Independent_161_1", "Independent_161_2": "Independent_161_2", "RJD": "RJD", "Independent_162_1": "Independent_162_1", "Independent_162_2": "Independent_162_2", "Independent_162_3": "Independent_162_3", "JGP": "JGP", "Independent_162_4": "Independent_162_4", "Independent_163_1": "Independent_163_1", "Independent_163_2": "Independent_163_2", "Independent_163_3": "Independent_163_3", "Independent_163_4": "Independent_163_4", "Independent_164_1": "Independent_164_1", "Independent_164_2": "Independent_164_2", "Independent_164_3": "Independent_164_3", "Independent_165_1": "Independent_165_1", "Independent_165_2": "Independent_165_2", "Independent_165_3": "Independent_165_3", "Independent_165_4": "Independent_165_4", "Independent_165_5": "Independent_165_5", "SJP_R": "SJP_R", "Independent_165_6": "Independent_165_6", "Independent_165_7": "Independent_165_7", "Independent_166_1": "Independent_166_1", "Independent_166_2": "Independent_166_2", "Independent_166_3": "Independent_166_3", "Independent_166_4": "Independent_166_4", "Independent_166_5": "Independent_166_5", "Independent_166_6": "Independent_166_6", "Independent_167_1": "Independent_167_1", "Independent_167_2": "Independent_167_2", "Independent_167_3": "Independent_167_3", "Independent_168_1": "Independent_168_1", "Independent_168_2": "Independent_168_2", "Independent_169_1": "Independent_169_1", "Independent_169_2": "Independent_169_2", "Independent_169_3": "Independent_169_3", "Independent_169_4": "Independent_169_4", "Independent_169_5": "Independent_169_5", "Independent_169_6": "Independent_169_6", "Independent_169_7": "Independent_169_7", "Independent_169_8": "Independent_169_8", "Independent_169_9": "Independent_169_9", "Independent_170_1": "Independent_170_1", "Independent_170_2": "Independent_170_2", "Independent_170_3": "Independent_170_3", "Independent_170_4": "Independent_170_4", "STPI": "STPI", "JD_S": "JD_S", "Independent_171_1": "Independent_171_1", "Independent_171_2": "Independent_171_2", "Independent_171_3": "Independent_171_3", "Independent_172_1": "Independent_172_1", "Independent_172_2": "Independent_172_2", "Independent_173_1": "Independent_173_1", "Independent_173_2": "Independent_173_2", "Independent_173_3": "Independent_173_3", "Independent_173_4": "Independent_173_4", "Independent_173_5": "Independent_173_5", "Independent_174_1": "Independent_174_1", "Independent_174_2": "Independent_174_2", "Independent_174_3": "Independent_174_3", "Independent_174_4": "Independent_174_4", "Independent_175_1": "Independent_175_1", "Independent_175_2": "Independent_175_2", "Independent_176_1": "Independent_176_1", "Independent_176_2": "Independent_176_2", "Independent_176_3": "Independent_176_3", "Independent_176_4": "Independent_176_4", "Independent_177_1": "Independent_177_1", "Independent_177_2": "Independent_177_2", "Independent_178_1": "Independent_178_1", "Independent_178_2": "Independent_178_2", "Independent_180_1": "Independent_180_1", "Independent_180_2": "Independent_180_2", "Independent_180_3": "Independent_180_3", "Independent_181_1": "Independent_181_1", "Independent_181_2": "Independent_181_2", "Independent_181_3": "Independent_181_3", "Independent_182_1": "Independent_182_1", "Independent_182_2": "Independent_182_2", "Independent_183_1": "Independent_183_1", "Independent_183_2": "Independent_183_2", "Independent_183_3": "Independent_183_3", "Independent_184_1": "Independent_184_1", "Independent_184_2": "Independent_184_2", "Independent_184_3": "Independent_184_3", "Independent_184_4": "Independent_184_4", "Independent_187_1": "Independent_187_1", "Independent_187_2": "Independent_187_2", "Independent_189_1": "Independent_189_1", "Independent_190_1": "Independent_190_1", "Independent_191_1": "Independent_191_1", "ABHM": "ABHM", "Independent_195_1": "Independent_195_1", "Independent_195_2": "Independent_195_2", "Independent_203_1": "Independent_203_1", "Independent_204_1": "Independent_204_1", "Independent_204_2": "Independent_204_2", "Independent_205_1": "Independent_205_1", "Independent_206_1": "Independent_206_1", "Independent_207_1": "Independent_207_1", "Independent_208_1": "Independent_208_1", "INL": "INL", "Independent_209_1": "Independent_209_1", "Independent_211_1": "Independent_211_1", "Independent_212_1": "Independent_212_1", "Independent_212_2": "Independent_212_2", "Independent_212_3": "Independent_212_3", "Independent_213_1": "Independent_213_1", "Independent_215_1": "Independent_215_1", "Independent_216_1": "Independent_216_1", "Independent_216_2": "Independent_216_2", "Independent_217_1": "Independent_217_1", "DSP_P": "DSP_P", "Independent_218_1": "Independent_218_1", "Independent_219_1": "Independent_219_1", "Independent_220_1": "Independent_220_1", "Independent_221_1": "Independent_221_1", "Independent_222_1": "Independent_222_1", "JHAP": "JHAP", "Independent_223_1": "Independent_223_1", "Independent_224_1": "Independent_224_1", "Independent_226_1": "Independent_226_1", "Independent_228_1": "Independent_228_1", "Independent_234_1": "Independent_234_1", "Independent_236_1": "Independent_236_1", "Independent_236_2": "Independent_236_2", "Independent_236_3": "Independent_236_3", "JKP_N": "JKP_N", "Independent_237_1": "Independent_237_1", "Independent_237_2": "Independent_237_2", "Independent_238_1": "Independent_238_1", "AJSU": "AJSU", "JVM": "JVM", "Independent_239_1": "Independent_239_1", "Independent_239_2": "Independent_239_2", "Independent_241_1": "Independent_241_1", "Independent_241_2": "Independent_241_2", "Independent_242_1": "Independent_242_1", "Independent_243_1": "Independent_243_1", "Independent_244_1": "Independent_244_1", "AJSUP": "AJSUP", "Independent_248_1": "Independent_248_1", "Independent_248_2": "Independent_248_2", "Independent_249_1": "Independent_249_1", "Independent_250_1": "Independent_250_1", "Independent_250_2": "Independent_250_2", "Independent_250_3": "Independent_250_3", "Independent_252_1": "Independent_252_1", "Independent_252_2": "Independent_252_2", "Independent_252_3": "Independent_252_3", "Independent_253_1": "Independent_253_1", "Independent_253_2": "Independent_253_2", "Independent_264_1": "Independent_264_1", "Independent_268_1": "Independent_268_1", "Independent_270_1": "Independent_270_1", "Independent_270_2": "Independent_270_2", "Independent_271_1": "Independent_271_1", "Independent_273_1": "Independent_273_1", "Independent_275_1": "Independent_275_1", "Independent_275_2": "Independent_275_2", "Independent_283_1": "Independent_283_1", "Independent_285_1": "Independent_285_1", "Independent_285_2": "Independent_285_2", "Independent_285_3": "Independent_285_3", "Independent_289_1": "Independent_289_1", "Independent_291_1": "Independent_291_1", "Independent_292_1": "Independent_292_1", "JP": "JP", "Independent_292_2": "Independent_292_2", "Independent_293_1": "Independent_293_1", "Independent_293_2": "Independent_293_2", "Independent_293_3": "Independent_293_3", "Independent_294_1": "Independent_294_1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 294, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 294, "registered_not_positive": 294}, "n_stations_flagged": 294, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:52:58.758987", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.646, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.666, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.671, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.532, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.444, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.671, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.532, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.532, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.424, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.582, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 294}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b0a1ec24cff743f1992c374951fd2187", "name": "India 2014 local (overnight india-maharashtra-2014-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2014, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Maharashtra/Maharashtra_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"INC": "INC", "NCP": "NCP", "BJP": "BJP", "SHS": "SHS", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "NOTA": "NOTA", "MNS": "MNS", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "Independent_1_3": "Independent_1_3", "BMUP": "BMUP", "CPM": "CPM", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "Independent_2_3": "Independent_2_3", "BSP": "BSP", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "PWPI": "PWPI", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "BBM": "BBM", "LB": "LB", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "Independent_5_2": "Independent_5_2", "Independent_5_3": "Independent_5_3", "Independent_5_4": "Independent_5_4", "STBP": "STBP", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "Independent_6_2": "Independent_6_2", "AIMIM": "AIMIM", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "Independent_7_2": "Independent_7_2", "Independent_7_3": "Independent_7_3", "CPI": "CPI", "SP": "SP", "Independent_7_4": "Independent_7_4", "Independent_7_5": "Independent_7_5", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "Independent_8_3": "Independent_8_3", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "APOI": "APOI", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "WPOI": "WPOI", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "MNDP": "MNDP", "RPI": "RPI", "Independent_11_3": "Independent_11_3", "Independent_11_4": "Independent_11_4", "Independent_11_5": "Independent_11_5", "RVNP": "RVNP", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "Independent_12_3": "Independent_12_3", "Independent_12_4": "Independent_12_4", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "Independent_13_3": "Independent_13_3", "Independent_13_4": "Independent_13_4", "ABHM": "ABHM", "Independent_13_5": "Independent_13_5", "RSP(S)": "RSP(S)", "Independent_13_6": "Independent_13_6", "Independent_13_7": "Independent_13_7", "Independent_13_8": "Independent_13_8", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "Independent_14_3": "Independent_14_3", "ARP": "ARP", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_15_2": "Independent_15_2", "Independent_15_3": "Independent_15_3", "Independent_15_4": "Independent_15_4", "Independent_15_5": "Independent_15_5", "Independent_15_6": "Independent_15_6", "Independent_15_7": "Independent_15_7", "Independent_15_8": "Independent_15_8", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_16_2": "Independent_16_2", "Independent_16_3": "Independent_16_3", "Independent_16_4": "Independent_16_4", "Independent_16_5": "Independent_16_5", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "Independent_19_3": "Independent_19_3", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_20_2": "Independent_20_2", "Independent_20_3": "Independent_20_3", "Independent_20_4": "Independent_20_4", "Independent_20_5": "Independent_20_5", "Independent_20_6": "Independent_20_6", "HJP": "HJP", "Independent_20_7": "Independent_20_7", "Independent_20_8": "Independent_20_8", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_21_2": "Independent_21_2", "Independent_21_3": "Independent_21_3", "Independent_21_4": "Independent_21_4", "Independent_21_5": "Independent_21_5", "Independent_21_6": "Independent_21_6", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_22_2": "Independent_22_2", "Independent_22_3": "Independent_22_3", "Independent_22_4": "Independent_22_4", "Independent_22_5": "Independent_22_5", "Independent_22_6": "Independent_22_6", "Independent_22_7": "Independent_22_7", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_23_2": "Independent_23_2", "Independent_23_3": "Independent_23_3", "RPSN": "RPSN", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "Independent_24_2": "Independent_24_2", "Independent_24_3": "Independent_24_3", "Independent_24_4": "Independent_24_4", "Independent_24_5": "Independent_24_5", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "Independent_25_4": "Independent_25_4", "Independent_25_5": "Independent_25_5", "Independent_25_6": "Independent_25_6", "Independent_25_7": "Independent_25_7", "Independent_25_8": "Independent_25_8", "Independent_25_9": "Independent_25_9", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "Independent_26_3": "Independent_26_3", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "Independent_27_3": "Independent_27_3", "Independent_27_4": "Independent_27_4", "Independent_27_5": "Independent_27_5", "Independent_27_6": "Independent_27_6", "Independent_27_7": "Independent_27_7", "Independent_27_8": "Independent_27_8", "Independent_27_9": "Independent_27_9", "Independent_27_10": "Independent_27_10", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "Independent_28_4": "Independent_28_4", "Independent_28_5": "Independent_28_5", "Independent_28_6": "Independent_28_6", "Independent_28_7": "Independent_28_7", "Independent_28_8": "Independent_28_8", "Independent_28_9": "Independent_28_9", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "Independent_29_4": "Independent_29_4", "Independent_29_5": "Independent_29_5", "Independent_29_6": "Independent_29_6", "Independent_29_7": "Independent_29_7", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "Independent_30_3": "Independent_30_3", "Independent_30_4": "Independent_30_4", "Independent_30_5": "Independent_30_5", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_31_2": "Independent_31_2", "Independent_31_3": "Independent_31_3", "Independent_31_4": "Independent_31_4", "Independent_31_5": "Independent_31_5", "Independent_31_6": "Independent_31_6", "Independent_31_7": "Independent_31_7", "Independent_31_8": "Independent_31_8", "Independent_31_9": "Independent_31_9", "Independent_31_10": "Independent_31_10", "Independent_31_11": "Independent_31_11", "Independent_31_12": "Independent_31_12", "Independent_31_13": "Independent_31_13", "Independent_31_14": "Independent_31_14", "Independent_31_15": "Independent_31_15", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_32_3": "Independent_32_3", "Independent_32_4": "Independent_32_4", "Independent_32_5": "Independent_32_5", "AIFB": "AIFB", "Independent_32_6": "Independent_32_6", "BVA": "BVA", "Independent_32_7": "Independent_32_7", "Independent_32_8": "Independent_32_8", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "RKCGP": "RKCGP", "Independent_33_4": "Independent_33_4", "Independent_33_5": "Independent_33_5", "Independent_33_6": "Independent_33_6", "Independent_33_7": "Independent_33_7", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_34_3": "Independent_34_3", "Independent_34_4": "Independent_34_4", "Independent_34_5": "Independent_34_5", "Independent_34_6": "Independent_34_6", "Independent_34_7": "Independent_34_7", "Independent_34_8": "Independent_34_8", "BSP(A)": "BSP(A)", "Independent_34_9": "Independent_34_9", "Independent_34_10": "Independent_34_10", "Independent_34_11": "Independent_34_11", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "CPIM": "CPIM", "Independent_35_2": "Independent_35_2", "Independent_35_3": "Independent_35_3", "Independent_35_4": "Independent_35_4", "Independent_35_5": "Independent_35_5", "Independent_35_6": "Independent_35_6", "Independent_35_7": "Independent_35_7", "Independent_35_8": "Independent_35_8", "Independent_35_9": "Independent_35_9", "Independent_35_10": "Independent_35_10", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_36_3": "Independent_36_3", "Independent_36_4": "Independent_36_4", "Independent_36_5": "Independent_36_5", "GGP": "GGP", "RP(K)": "RP(K)", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "Independent_37_3": "Independent_37_3", "Independent_37_4": "Independent_37_4", "Independent_37_5": "Independent_37_5", "Independent_37_6": "Independent_37_6", "Independent_37_7": "Independent_37_7", "Independent_37_8": "Independent_37_8", "IUML": "IUML", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_38_3": "Independent_38_3", "Independent_38_4": "Independent_38_4", "Independent_38_5": "Independent_38_5", "Independent_38_6": "Independent_38_6", "Independent_38_7": "Independent_38_7", "Independent_38_8": "Independent_38_8", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_39_2": "Independent_39_2", "Independent_39_3": "Independent_39_3", "Independent_39_4": "Independent_39_4", "Independent_39_5": "Independent_39_5", "Independent_39_6": "Independent_39_6", "Independent_39_7": "Independent_39_7", "Independent_39_8": "Independent_39_8", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_40_3": "Independent_40_3", "Independent_40_4": "Independent_40_4", "Independent_40_5": "Independent_40_5", "Independent_40_6": "Independent_40_6", "Independent_40_7": "Independent_40_7", "Independent_40_8": "Independent_40_8", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_42_2": "Independent_42_2", "Independent_42_3": "Independent_42_3", "Independent_42_4": "Independent_42_4", "Independent_42_5": "Independent_42_5", "Independent_42_6": "Independent_42_6", "Independent_42_7": "Independent_42_7", "Independent_42_8": "Independent_42_8", "Independent_42_9": "Independent_42_9", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_43_2": "Independent_43_2", "Independent_43_3": "Independent_43_3", "Independent_43_4": "Independent_43_4", "Independent_43_5": "Independent_43_5", "Independent_43_6": "Independent_43_6", "Independent_43_7": "Independent_43_7", "Independent_43_8": "Independent_43_8", "BDC": "BDC", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "Independent_44_3": "Independent_44_3", "Independent_44_4": "Independent_44_4", "Independent_44_5": "Independent_44_5", "Independent_44_6": "Independent_44_6", "Independent_44_7": "Independent_44_7", "Independent_44_8": "Independent_44_8", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_45_2": "Independent_45_2", "Independent_45_3": "Independent_45_3", "Independent_45_4": "Independent_45_4", "Independent_45_5": "Independent_45_5", "Independent_45_6": "Independent_45_6", "Independent_45_7": "Independent_45_7", "Independent_45_8": "Independent_45_8", "Independent_45_9": "Independent_45_9", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "Independent_46_3": "Independent_46_3", "Independent_46_4": "Independent_46_4", "Independent_46_5": "Independent_46_5", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "Independent_47_3": "Independent_47_3", "Independent_47_4": "Independent_47_4", "Independent_47_5": "Independent_47_5", "Independent_47_6": "Independent_47_6", "Independent_47_7": "Independent_47_7", "SARAPA": "SARAPA", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_48_2": "Independent_48_2", "Independent_48_3": "Independent_48_3", "Independent_48_4": "Independent_48_4", "Independent_48_5": "Independent_48_5", "Independent_48_6": "Independent_48_6", "Independent_48_7": "Independent_48_7", "Independent_48_8": "Independent_48_8", "RPI(KH)": "RPI(KH)", "Independent_48_9": "Independent_48_9", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "Independent_49_3": "Independent_49_3", "Independent_49_4": "Independent_49_4", "Independent_49_5": "Independent_49_5", "Independent_49_6": "Independent_49_6", "Independent_49_7": "Independent_49_7", "Independent_49_8": "Independent_49_8", "RPIE": "RPIE", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_50_3": "Independent_50_3", "Independent_50_4": "Independent_50_4", "Independent_50_5": "Independent_50_5", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_51_3": "Independent_51_3", "Independent_51_4": "Independent_51_4", "Independent_51_5": "Independent_51_5", "Independent_51_6": "Independent_51_6", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "Independent_52_3": "Independent_52_3", "Independent_52_4": "Independent_52_4", "Independent_52_5": "Independent_52_5", "Independent_52_6": "Independent_52_6", "CSM": "CSM", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "DESEP": "DESEP", "Independent_53_2": "Independent_53_2", "Independent_53_3": "Independent_53_3", "Independent_53_4": "Independent_53_4", "Independent_53_5": "Independent_53_5", "Independent_53_6": "Independent_53_6", "Independent_53_7": "Independent_53_7", "Independent_53_8": "Independent_53_8", "BPI": "BPI", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_54_3": "Independent_54_3", "Independent_54_4": "Independent_54_4", "Independent_54_5": "Independent_54_5", "Independent_54_6": "Independent_54_6", "Independent_54_7": "Independent_54_7", "Independent_54_8": "Independent_54_8", "Independent_54_9": "Independent_54_9", "SSRD": "SSRD", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_55_2": "Independent_55_2", "Independent_55_3": "Independent_55_3", "Independent_55_4": "Independent_55_4", "Independent_55_5": "Independent_55_5", "Independent_55_6": "Independent_55_6", "Independent_55_7": "Independent_55_7", "Independent_55_8": "Independent_55_8", "Independent_55_9": "Independent_55_9", "Independent_55_10": "Independent_55_10", "Independent_55_11": "Independent_55_11", "Independent_55_12": "Independent_55_12", "Independent_55_13": "Independent_55_13", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_56_2": "Independent_56_2", "Independent_56_3": "Independent_56_3", "Independent_56_4": "Independent_56_4", "Independent_56_5": "Independent_56_5", "BMSM": "BMSM", "Independent_56_6": "Independent_56_6", "Independent_56_7": "Independent_56_7", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_57_2": "Independent_57_2", "Independent_57_3": "Independent_57_3", "Independent_57_4": "Independent_57_4", "Independent_57_5": "Independent_57_5", "Independent_57_6": "Independent_57_6", "Independent_57_7": "Independent_57_7", "Independent_57_8": "Independent_57_8", "Independent_57_9": "Independent_57_9", "Independent_57_10": "Independent_57_10", "Independent_58_1": "Independent_58_1", "Independent_58_2": "Independent_58_2", "BREM": "BREM", "Independent_58_3": "Independent_58_3", "Independent_58_4": "Independent_58_4", "Independent_58_5": "Independent_58_5", "Independent_58_6": "Independent_58_6", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_59_2": "Independent_59_2", "Independent_59_3": "Independent_59_3", "Independent_59_4": "Independent_59_4", "Independent_59_5": "Independent_59_5", "Independent_59_6": "Independent_59_6", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "Independent_60_3": "Independent_60_3", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "Independent_61_3": "Independent_61_3", "Independent_61_4": "Independent_61_4", "Independent_61_5": "Independent_61_5", "Independent_61_6": "Independent_61_6", "Independent_61_7": "Independent_61_7", "Independent_61_8": "Independent_61_8", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_62_3": "Independent_62_3", "Independent_62_4": "Independent_62_4", "Independent_62_5": "Independent_62_5", "Independent_62_6": "Independent_62_6", "Independent_62_7": "Independent_62_7", "Independent_62_8": "Independent_62_8", "Independent_62_9": "Independent_62_9", "Independent_62_10": "Independent_62_10", "Independent_62_11": "Independent_62_11", "Independent_62_12": "Independent_62_12", "Independent_62_13": "Independent_62_13", "Independent_62_14": "Independent_62_14", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "Independent_63_3": "Independent_63_3", "Independent_63_4": "Independent_63_4", "Independent_63_5": "Independent_63_5", "Independent_63_6": "Independent_63_6", "Independent_63_7": "Independent_63_7", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_64_2": "Independent_64_2", "Independent_64_3": "Independent_64_3", "Independent_64_4": "Independent_64_4", "Independent_64_5": "Independent_64_5", "Independent_64_6": "Independent_64_6", "Independent_64_7": "Independent_64_7", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_65_2": "Independent_65_2", "Independent_65_3": "Independent_65_3", "Independent_65_4": "Independent_65_4", "Independent_65_5": "Independent_65_5", "Independent_65_6": "Independent_65_6", "Independent_65_7": "Independent_65_7", "Independent_65_8": "Independent_65_8", "Independent_65_9": "Independent_65_9", "Independent_65_10": "Independent_65_10", "Independent_65_11": "Independent_65_11", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_66_2": "Independent_66_2", "Independent_66_3": "Independent_66_3", "Independent_67_1": "Independent_67_1", "Independent_67_2": "Independent_67_2", "Independent_67_3": "Independent_67_3", "Independent_67_4": "Independent_67_4", "Independent_67_5": "Independent_67_5", "Independent_67_6": "Independent_67_6", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_69_3": "Independent_69_3", "Independent_69_4": "Independent_69_4", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "Independent_70_2": "Independent_70_2", "Independent_70_3": "Independent_70_3", "Independent_70_4": "Independent_70_4", "Independent_70_5": "Independent_70_5", "RBCP": "RBCP", "Independent_71_1": "Independent_71_1", "Independent_71_2": "Independent_71_2", "Independent_71_3": "Independent_71_3", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_72_2": "Independent_72_2", "Independent_72_3": "Independent_72_3", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "Independent_73_3": "Independent_73_3", "Independent_73_4": "Independent_73_4", "Independent_73_5": "Independent_73_5", "Independent_73_6": "Independent_73_6", "Independent_73_7": "Independent_73_7", "SP(I)": "SP(I)", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_74_2": "Independent_74_2", "Independent_74_3": "Independent_74_3", "Independent_74_4": "Independent_74_4", "Independent_74_5": "Independent_74_5", "Independent_74_6": "Independent_74_6", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "Independent_74_7": "Independent_74_7", "Independent_74_8": "Independent_74_8", "ABMP": "ABMP", "Independent_74_9": "Independent_74_9", "Independent_74_10": "Independent_74_10", "Independent_74_11": "Independent_74_11", "Independent_74_12": "Independent_74_12", "Independent_74_13": "Independent_74_13", "Independent_74_14": "Independent_74_14", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_75_2": "Independent_75_2", "Independent_75_3": "Independent_75_3", "Independent_75_4": "Independent_75_4", "Independent_75_5": "Independent_75_5", "Independent_75_6": "Independent_75_6", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_76_3": "Independent_76_3", "Independent_76_4": "Independent_76_4", "Independent_76_5": "Independent_76_5", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_77_2": "Independent_77_2", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_78_2": "Independent_78_2", "Independent_78_3": "Independent_78_3", "Independent_78_4": "Independent_78_4", "Independent_78_5": "Independent_78_5", "Independent_78_6": "Independent_78_6", "Independent_78_7": "Independent_78_7", "Independent_78_8": "Independent_78_8", "Independent_78_9": "Independent_78_9", "Independent_78_10": "Independent_78_10", "Independent_78_11": "Independent_78_11", "Independent_79_1": "Independent_79_1", "Independent_79_2": "Independent_79_2", "Independent_79_3": "Independent_79_3", "Independent_79_4": "Independent_79_4", "Independent_79_5": "Independent_79_5", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_80_2": "Independent_80_2", "PBI": "PBI", "Independent_80_3": "Independent_80_3", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "Independent_81_2": "Independent_81_2", "Independent_81_3": "Independent_81_3", "Independent_81_4": "Independent_81_4", "PRCP": "PRCP", "Independent_81_5": "Independent_81_5", "Independent_81_6": "Independent_81_6", "Independent_81_7": "Independent_81_7", "Independent_82_1": "Independent_82_1", "Independent_82_2": "Independent_82_2", "Independent_82_3": "Independent_82_3", "Independent_82_4": "Independent_82_4", "Independent_82_5": "Independent_82_5", "Independent_82_6": "Independent_82_6", "Independent_82_7": "Independent_82_7", "Independent_82_8": "Independent_82_8", "Independent_82_9": "Independent_82_9", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_83_2": "Independent_83_2", "Independent_83_3": "Independent_83_3", "Independent_83_4": "Independent_83_4", "Independent_83_5": "Independent_83_5", "Independent_83_6": "Independent_83_6", "Independent_83_7": "Independent_83_7", "AWVP": "AWVP", "Independent_84_1": "Independent_84_1", "Independent_84_2": "Independent_84_2", "RBS": "RBS", "Independent_85_1": "Independent_85_1", "Independent_85_2": "Independent_85_2", "Independent_86_1": "Independent_86_1", "Independent_86_2": "Independent_86_2", "Independent_86_3": "Independent_86_3", "Independent_86_4": "Independent_86_4", "Independent_86_5": "Independent_86_5", "Independent_86_6": "Independent_86_6", "MBT": "MBT", "Independent_86_7": "Independent_86_7", "Independent_86_8": "Independent_86_8", "Independent_86_9": "Independent_86_9", "Independent_86_10": "Independent_86_10", "Independent_86_11": "Independent_86_11", "Independent_86_12": "Independent_86_12", "Independent_86_13": "Independent_86_13", "Independent_86_14": "Independent_86_14", "Independent_86_15": "Independent_86_15", "RLD": "RLD", "Independent_87_1": "Independent_87_1", "Independent_87_2": "Independent_87_2", "Independent_87_3": "Independent_87_3", "Independent_87_4": "Independent_87_4", "Independent_87_5": "Independent_87_5", "Independent_87_6": "Independent_87_6", "Independent_87_7": "Independent_87_7", "Independent_87_8": "Independent_87_8", "Independent_87_9": "Independent_87_9", "Independent_87_10": "Independent_87_10", "Independent_87_11": "Independent_87_11", "Independent_87_12": "Independent_87_12", "Independent_87_13": "Independent_87_13", "Independent_87_14": "Independent_87_14", "Independent_87_15": "Independent_87_15", "Independent_87_16": "Independent_87_16", "Independent_87_17": "Independent_87_17", "Independent_87_18": "Independent_87_18", "Independent_87_19": "Independent_87_19", "Independent_87_20": "Independent_87_20", "Independent_87_21": "Independent_87_21", "Independent_87_22": "Independent_87_22", "Independent_87_23": "Independent_87_23", "Independent_88_1": "Independent_88_1", "JSS": "JSS", "Independent_88_2": "Independent_88_2", "Independent_88_3": "Independent_88_3", "Independent_88_4": "Independent_88_4", "Independent_88_5": "Independent_88_5", "Independent_88_6": "Independent_88_6", "JD(S)": "JD(S)", "Independent_88_7": "Independent_88_7", "Independent_88_8": "Independent_88_8", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_89_2": "Independent_89_2", "Independent_90_1": "Independent_90_1", "Independent_90_2": "Independent_90_2", "Independent_90_3": "Independent_90_3", "Independent_90_4": "Independent_90_4", "Independent_90_5": "Independent_90_5", "Independent_90_6": "Independent_90_6", "Independent_90_7": "Independent_90_7", "Independent_91_1": "Independent_91_1", "Independent_91_2": "Independent_91_2", "Independent_91_3": "Independent_91_3", "Independent_91_4": "Independent_91_4", "Independent_91_5": "Independent_91_5", "Independent_91_6": "Independent_91_6", "Independent_92_1": "Independent_92_1", "Independent_92_2": "Independent_92_2", "Independent_92_3": "Independent_92_3", "Independent_92_4": "Independent_92_4", "RSPS": "RSPS", "Independent_93_1": "Independent_93_1", "Independent_93_2": "Independent_93_2", "Independent_93_3": "Independent_93_3", "Independent_94_1": "Independent_94_1", "Independent_94_2": "Independent_94_2", "Independent_94_3": "Independent_94_3", "Independent_94_4": "Independent_94_4", "Independent_94_5": "Independent_94_5", "Independent_94_6": "Independent_94_6", "Independent_94_7": "Independent_94_7", "Independent_95_1": "Independent_95_1", "Independent_95_2": "Independent_95_2", "Independent_95_3": "Independent_95_3", "Independent_95_4": "Independent_95_4", "Independent_95_5": "Independent_95_5", "Independent_95_6": "Independent_95_6", "Independent_95_7": "Independent_95_7", "Independent_95_8": "Independent_95_8", "Independent_95_9": "Independent_95_9", "Independent_96_1": "Independent_96_1", "Independent_96_2": "Independent_96_2", "Independent_96_3": "Independent_96_3", "Independent_96_4": "Independent_96_4", "Independent_96_5": "Independent_96_5", "Independent_96_6": "Independent_96_6", "ANC": "ANC", "Independent_96_7": "Independent_96_7", "Independent_96_8": "Independent_96_8", "Independent_96_9": "Independent_96_9", "Independent_96_10": "Independent_96_10", "Independent_96_11": "Independent_96_11", "Independent_96_12": "Independent_96_12", "Independent_96_13": "Independent_96_13", "Independent_96_14": "Independent_96_14", "Independent_97_1": "Independent_97_1", "Independent_97_2": "Independent_97_2", "Independent_97_3": "Independent_97_3", "Independent_97_4": "Independent_97_4", "Independent_97_5": "Independent_97_5", "Independent_97_6": "Independent_97_6", "Independent_97_7": "Independent_97_7", "Independent_97_8": "Independent_97_8", "Independent_97_9": "Independent_97_9", "Independent_97_10": "Independent_97_10", "Independent_98_1": "Independent_98_1", "SWP": "SWP", "Independent_98_2": "Independent_98_2", "Independent_98_3": "Independent_98_3", "Independent_98_4": "Independent_98_4", "Independent_98_5": "Independent_98_5", "Independent_98_6": "Independent_98_6", "Independent_98_7": "Independent_98_7", "Independent_98_8": "Independent_98_8", "Independent_98_9": "Independent_98_9", "Independent_99_1": "Independent_99_1", "Independent_99_2": "Independent_99_2", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_100_2": "Independent_100_2", "Independent_100_3": "Independent_100_3", "Independent_100_4": "Independent_100_4", "Independent_100_5": "Independent_100_5", "Independent_101_1": "Independent_101_1", "Independent_101_2": "Independent_101_2", "Independent_101_3": "Independent_101_3", "Independent_101_4": "Independent_101_4", "Independent_101_5": "Independent_101_5", "Independent_101_6": "Independent_101_6", "NLP": "NLP", "Independent_102_1": "Independent_102_1", "Independent_102_2": "Independent_102_2", "Independent_102_3": "Independent_102_3", "Independent_102_4": "Independent_102_4", "Independent_102_5": "Independent_102_5", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_103_2": "Independent_103_2", "Independent_103_3": "Independent_103_3", "Independent_103_4": "Independent_103_4", "Independent_103_5": "Independent_103_5", "Independent_103_6": "Independent_103_6", "Independent_103_7": "Independent_103_7", "Independent_103_8": "Independent_103_8", "Independent_103_9": "Independent_103_9", "Independent_103_10": "Independent_103_10", "Independent_104_1": "Independent_104_1", "Independent_104_2": "Independent_104_2", "Independent_104_3": "Independent_104_3", "Independent_104_4": "Independent_104_4", "Independent_104_5": "Independent_104_5", "Independent_104_6": "Independent_104_6", "Independent_104_7": "Independent_104_7", "Independent_104_8": "Independent_104_8", "Independent_104_9": "Independent_104_9", "Independent_105_1": "Independent_105_1", "Independent_105_2": "Independent_105_2", "Independent_105_3": "Independent_105_3", "Independent_105_4": "Independent_105_4", "Independent_106_1": "Independent_106_1", "Independent_106_2": "Independent_106_2", "Independent_106_3": "Independent_106_3", "Independent_106_4": "Independent_106_4", "Independent_106_5": "Independent_106_5", "Independent_107_1": "Independent_107_1", "Independent_107_2": "Independent_107_2", "Independent_107_3": "Independent_107_3", "Independent_107_4": "Independent_107_4", "Independent_107_5": "Independent_107_5", "Independent_107_6": "Independent_107_6", "Independent_107_7": "Independent_107_7", "Independent_107_8": "Independent_107_8", "PREP": "PREP", "Independent_108_1": "Independent_108_1", "Independent_108_2": "Independent_108_2", "Independent_108_3": "Independent_108_3", "Independent_108_4": "Independent_108_4", "Independent_108_5": "Independent_108_5", "Independent_108_6": "Independent_108_6", "Independent_109_1": "Independent_109_1", "Independent_109_2": "Independent_109_2", "Independent_109_3": "Independent_109_3", "Independent_109_4": "Independent_109_4", "Independent_109_5": "Independent_109_5", "Independent_109_6": "Independent_109_6", "Independent_109_7": "Independent_109_7", "Independent_109_8": "Independent_109_8", "Independent_109_9": "Independent_109_9", "Independent_109_10": "Independent_109_10", "Independent_109_11": "Independent_109_11", "Independent_109_12": "Independent_109_12", "Independent_109_13": "Independent_109_13", "Independent_109_14": "Independent_109_14", "Independent_109_15": "Independent_109_15", "GAAP": "GAAP", "Independent_109_16": "Independent_109_16", "Independent_109_17": "Independent_109_17", "Independent_110_1": "Independent_110_1", "Independent_110_2": "Independent_110_2", "Independent_110_3": "Independent_110_3", "Independent_110_4": "Independent_110_4", "Independent_110_5": "Independent_110_5", "Independent_110_6": "Independent_110_6", "Independent_110_7": "Independent_110_7", "Independent_110_8": "Independent_110_8", "Independent_110_9": "Independent_110_9", "Independent_110_10": "Independent_110_10", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "Independent_111_2": "Independent_111_2", "Independent_111_3": "Independent_111_3", "Independent_111_4": "Independent_111_4", "Independent_111_5": "Independent_111_5", "Independent_111_6": "Independent_111_6", "Independent_111_7": "Independent_111_7", "Independent_112_1": "Independent_112_1", "Independent_112_2": "Independent_112_2", "Independent_112_3": "Independent_112_3", "Independent_112_4": "Independent_112_4", "Independent_112_5": "Independent_112_5", "Independent_113_1": "Independent_113_1", "Independent_113_2": "Independent_113_2", "Independent_113_3": "Independent_113_3", "Independent_113_4": "Independent_113_4", "Independent_113_5": "Independent_113_5", "Independent_113_6": "Independent_113_6", "Independent_113_7": "Independent_113_7", "Independent_114_1": "Independent_114_1", "Independent_114_2": "Independent_114_2", "Independent_114_3": "Independent_114_3", "Independent_114_4": "Independent_114_4", "Independent_114_5": "Independent_114_5", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_115_2": "Independent_115_2", "Independent_115_3": "Independent_115_3", "Independent_115_4": "Independent_115_4", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "Independent_116_2": "Independent_116_2", "Independent_116_3": "Independent_116_3", "Independent_116_4": "Independent_116_4", "Independent_116_5": "Independent_116_5", "Independent_117_1": "Independent_117_1", "Independent_118_1": "Independent_118_1", "Independent_118_2": "Independent_118_2", "Independent_118_3": "Independent_118_3", "Independent_118_4": "Independent_118_4", "Independent_119_1": "Independent_119_1", "Independent_119_2": "Independent_119_2", "Independent_119_3": "Independent_119_3", "Independent_119_4": "Independent_119_4", "Independent_119_5": "Independent_119_5", "Independent_119_6": "Independent_119_6", "Independent_120_1": "Independent_120_1", "Independent_120_2": "Independent_120_2", "Independent_121_1": "Independent_121_1", "Independent_122_1": "Independent_122_1", "Independent_122_2": "Independent_122_2", "Independent_122_3": "Independent_122_3", "Independent_123_1": "Independent_123_1", "Independent_123_2": "Independent_123_2", "Independent_123_3": "Independent_123_3", "Independent_123_4": "Independent_123_4", "HEAP": "HEAP", "Independent_123_5": "Independent_123_5", "Independent_124_1": "Independent_124_1", "Independent_124_2": "Independent_124_2", "Independent_124_3": "Independent_124_3", "Independent_124_4": "Independent_124_4", "Independent_124_5": "Independent_124_5", "Independent_125_1": "Independent_125_1", "Independent_125_2": "Independent_125_2", "Independent_125_3": "Independent_125_3", "Independent_126_1": "Independent_126_1", "Independent_126_2": "Independent_126_2", "Independent_126_3": "Independent_126_3", "Independent_126_4": "Independent_126_4", "Independent_126_5": "Independent_126_5", "Independent_126_6": "Independent_126_6", "Independent_126_7": "Independent_126_7", "Independent_126_8": "Independent_126_8", "Independent_127_1": "Independent_127_1", "Independent_127_2": "Independent_127_2", "Independent_127_3": "Independent_127_3", "Independent_127_4": "Independent_127_4", "Independent_127_5": "Independent_127_5", "Independent_127_6": "Independent_127_6", "Independent_128_1": "Independent_128_1", "Independent_128_2": "Independent_128_2", "Independent_128_3": "Independent_128_3", "Independent_128_4": "Independent_128_4", "Independent_129_1": "Independent_129_1", "Independent_129_2": "Independent_129_2", "Independent_129_3": "Independent_129_3", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "Independent_131_1": "Independent_131_1", "Independent_131_2": "Independent_131_2", "Independent_131_3": "Independent_131_3", "Independent_132_1": "Independent_132_1", "Independent_133_1": "Independent_133_1", "Independent_133_2": "Independent_133_2", "Independent_133_3": "Independent_133_3", "Independent_134_1": "Independent_134_1", "Independent_134_2": "Independent_134_2", "Independent_135_1": "Independent_135_1", "Independent_136_1": "Independent_136_1", "Independent_136_2": "Independent_136_2", "Independent_136_3": "Independent_136_3", "Independent_137_1": "Independent_137_1", "Independent_137_2": "Independent_137_2", "PECP": "PECP", "Independent_137_3": "Independent_137_3", "Independent_137_4": "Independent_137_4", "Independent_138_1": "Independent_138_1", "Independent_138_2": "Independent_138_2", "Independent_138_3": "Independent_138_3", "Independent_138_4": "Independent_138_4", "Independent_138_5": "Independent_138_5", "Independent_138_6": "Independent_138_6", "Independent_138_7": "Independent_138_7", "Independent_138_8": "Independent_138_8", "Independent_138_9": "Independent_138_9", "Independent_139_1": "Independent_139_1", "Independent_139_2": "Independent_139_2", "Independent_139_3": "Independent_139_3", "Independent_139_4": "Independent_139_4", "Independent_139_5": "Independent_139_5", "Independent_139_6": "Independent_139_6", "SAOI": "SAOI", "Independent_139_7": "Independent_139_7", "Independent_140_1": "Independent_140_1", "Independent_140_2": "Independent_140_2", "Independent_140_3": "Independent_140_3", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "Independent_140_4": "Independent_140_4", "Independent_140_5": "Independent_140_5", "Independent_140_6": "Independent_140_6", "Independent_141_1": "Independent_141_1", "Independent_141_2": "Independent_141_2", "Independent_141_3": "Independent_141_3", "Independent_141_4": "Independent_141_4", "Independent_141_5": "Independent_141_5", "Independent_141_6": "Independent_141_6", "Independent_141_7": "Independent_141_7", "Independent_141_8": "Independent_141_8", "Independent_141_9": "Independent_141_9", "Independent_141_10": "Independent_141_10", "Independent_141_11": "Independent_141_11", "Independent_141_12": "Independent_141_12", "Independent_141_13": "Independent_141_13", "Independent_141_14": "Independent_141_14", "Independent_142_1": "Independent_142_1", "Independent_142_2": "Independent_142_2", "Independent_143_1": "Independent_143_1", "Independent_143_2": "Independent_143_2", "Independent_143_3": "Independent_143_3", "Independent_143_4": "Independent_143_4", "Independent_144_1": "Independent_144_1", "Independent_144_2": "Independent_144_2", "Independent_144_3": "Independent_144_3", "Independent_145_1": "Independent_145_1", "Independent_145_2": "Independent_145_2", "Independent_145_3": "Independent_145_3", "Independent_146_1": "Independent_146_1", "Independent_146_2": "Independent_146_2", "Independent_146_3": "Independent_146_3", "Independent_146_4": "Independent_146_4", "Independent_146_5": "Independent_146_5", "Independent_147_1": "Independent_147_1", "Independent_147_2": "Independent_147_2", "Independent_147_3": "Independent_147_3", "Independent_148_1": "Independent_148_1", "Independent_148_2": "Independent_148_2", "Independent_148_3": "Independent_148_3", "Independent_149_1": "Independent_149_1", "Independent_149_2": "Independent_149_2", "Independent_149_3": "Independent_149_3", "Independent_149_4": "Independent_149_4", "Independent_149_5": "Independent_149_5", "Independent_149_6": "Independent_149_6", "Independent_150_1": "Independent_150_1", "Independent_150_2": "Independent_150_2", "Independent_150_3": "Independent_150_3", "Independent_150_4": "Independent_150_4", "Independent_150_5": "Independent_150_5", "RPI(KM)": "RPI(KM)", "Independent_151_1": "Independent_151_1", "Independent_151_2": "Independent_151_2", "Independent_151_3": "Independent_151_3", "Independent_151_4": "Independent_151_4", "Independent_151_5": "Independent_151_5", "Independent_151_6": "Independent_151_6", "Independent_151_7": "Independent_151_7", "Independent_151_8": "Independent_151_8", "Independent_152_1": "Independent_152_1", "Independent_152_2": "Independent_152_2", "Independent_152_3": "Independent_152_3", "LPI": "LPI", "Independent_153_1": "Independent_153_1", "Independent_153_2": "Independent_153_2", "Independent_153_3": "Independent_153_3", "Independent_153_4": "Independent_153_4", "Independent_153_5": "Independent_153_5", "ABJS": "ABJS", "Independent_154_1": "Independent_154_1", "Independent_154_2": "Independent_154_2", "Independent_154_3": "Independent_154_3", "Independent_154_4": "Independent_154_4", "Independent_154_5": "Independent_154_5", "Independent_155_1": "Independent_155_1", "Independent_155_2": "Independent_155_2", "Independent_155_3": "Independent_155_3", "Independent_156_1": "Independent_156_1", "Independent_156_2": "Independent_156_2", "Independent_156_3": "Independent_156_3", "Independent_156_4": "Independent_156_4", "Independent_157_1": "Independent_157_1", "Independent_157_2": "Independent_157_2", "Independent_157_3": "Independent_157_3", "Independent_157_4": "Independent_157_4", "Independent_157_5": "Independent_157_5", "Independent_157_6": "Independent_157_6", "Independent_158_1": "Independent_158_1", "Independent_158_2": "Independent_158_2", "Independent_159_1": "Independent_159_1", "NBPP": "NBPP", "Independent_159_2": "Independent_159_2", "Independent_159_3": "Independent_159_3", "Independent_159_4": "Independent_159_4", "Independent_159_5": "Independent_159_5", "Independent_160_1": "Independent_160_1", "Independent_160_2": "Independent_160_2", "Independent_160_3": "Independent_160_3", "Independent_160_4": "Independent_160_4", "Independent_160_5": "Independent_160_5", "SVPP": "SVPP", "Independent_160_6": "Independent_160_6", "Independent_161_1": "Independent_161_1", "Independent_161_2": "Independent_161_2", "Independent_161_3": "Independent_161_3", "Independent_161_4": "Independent_161_4", "Independent_162_1": "Independent_162_1", "Independent_162_2": "Independent_162_2", "Independent_162_3": "Independent_162_3", "Independent_162_4": "Independent_162_4", "Independent_163_1": "Independent_163_1", "Independent_163_2": "Independent_163_2", "Independent_163_3": "Independent_163_3", "Independent_163_4": "Independent_163_4", "Independent_163_5": "Independent_163_5", "RAPA": "RAPA", "HND": "HND", "Independent_164_1": "Independent_164_1", "RKSP": "RKSP", "Independent_164_2": "Independent_164_2", "Independent_165_1": "Independent_165_1", "Independent_165_2": "Independent_165_2", "AIKC": "AIKC", "RUC": "RUC", "Independent_166_1": "Independent_166_1", "Independent_166_2": "Independent_166_2", "Independent_166_3": "Independent_166_3", "Independent_167_1": "Independent_167_1", "Independent_167_2": "Independent_167_2", "Independent_167_3": "Independent_167_3", "KKJHS": "KKJHS", "Independent_168_1": "Independent_168_1", "Independent_168_2": "Independent_168_2", "Independent_168_3": "Independent_168_3", "Independent_168_4": "Independent_168_4", "SUCI": "SUCI", "Independent_168_5": "Independent_168_5", "Independent_169_1": "Independent_169_1", "Independent_169_2": "Independent_169_2", "Independent_169_3": "Independent_169_3", "Independent_169_4": "Independent_169_4", "Independent_169_5": "Independent_169_5", "Independent_169_6": "Independent_169_6", "Independent_169_7": "Independent_169_7", "Independent_169_8": "Independent_169_8", "Independent_169_9": "Independent_169_9", "Independent_170_1": "Independent_170_1", "Independent_170_2": "Independent_170_2", "Independent_170_3": "Independent_170_3", "Independent_170_4": "Independent_170_4", "Independent_170_5": "Independent_170_5", "Independent_170_6": "Independent_170_6", "Independent_170_7": "Independent_170_7", "Independent_171_1": "Independent_171_1", "Independent_171_2": "Independent_171_2", "Independent_171_3": "Independent_171_3", "Independent_171_4": "Independent_171_4", "Independent_171_5": "Independent_171_5", "Independent_171_6": "Independent_171_6", "Independent_171_7": "Independent_171_7", "Independent_171_8": "Independent_171_8", "Independent_171_9": "Independent_171_9", "Independent_171_10": "Independent_171_10", "Independent_172_1": "Independent_172_1", "Independent_172_2": "Independent_172_2", "Independent_172_3": "Independent_172_3", "Independent_172_4": "Independent_172_4", "Independent_172_5": "Independent_172_5", "Independent_173_1": "Independent_173_1", "Independent_173_2": "Independent_173_2", "Independent_174_1": "Independent_174_1", "Independent_174_2": "Independent_174_2", "Independent_174_3": "Independent_174_3", "Independent_174_4": "Independent_174_4", "Independent_174_5": "Independent_174_5", "Independent_174_6": "Independent_174_6", "Independent_174_7": "Independent_174_7", "Independent_175_1": "Independent_175_1", "Independent_175_2": "Independent_175_2", "Independent_175_3": "Independent_175_3", "Independent_175_4": "Independent_175_4", "Independent_175_5": "Independent_175_5", "Independent_175_6": "Independent_175_6", "Independent_175_7": "Independent_175_7", "Independent_175_8": "Independent_175_8", "Independent_175_9": "Independent_175_9", "Independent_175_10": "Independent_175_10", "Independent_175_11": "Independent_175_11", "AKBRP": "AKBRP", "Independent_176_1": "Independent_176_1", "Independent_176_2": "Independent_176_2", "Independent_176_3": "Independent_176_3", "Independent_176_4": "Independent_176_4", "Independent_176_5": "Independent_176_5", "Independent_177_1": "Independent_177_1", "Independent_177_2": "Independent_177_2", "Independent_178_1": "Independent_178_1", "Independent_178_2": "Independent_178_2", "Independent_178_3": "Independent_178_3", "Independent_178_4": "Independent_178_4", "Independent_178_5": "Independent_178_5", "Independent_178_6": "Independent_178_6", "Independent_179_1": "Independent_179_1", "Independent_179_2": "Independent_179_2", "Independent_179_3": "Independent_179_3", "Independent_179_4": "Independent_179_4", "Independent_180_1": "Independent_180_1", "Independent_180_2": "Independent_180_2", "Independent_180_3": "Independent_180_3", "Independent_180_4": "Independent_180_4", "Independent_180_5": "Independent_180_5", "Independent_180_6": "Independent_180_6", "Independent_181_1": "Independent_181_1", "Independent_182_1": "Independent_182_1", "Independent_182_2": "Independent_182_2", "Independent_182_3": "Independent_182_3", "Independent_182_4": "Independent_182_4", "Independent_182_5": "Independent_182_5", "ABHS": "ABHS", "Independent_184_1": "Independent_184_1", "Independent_184_2": "Independent_184_2", "Independent_184_3": "Independent_184_3", "Independent_185_1": "Independent_185_1", "Independent_185_2": "Independent_185_2", "Independent_185_3": "Independent_185_3", "Independent_185_4": "Independent_185_4", "MARP": "MARP", "Independent_185_5": "Independent_185_5", "Independent_185_6": "Independent_185_6", "Independent_185_7": "Independent_185_7", "Independent_185_8": "Independent_185_8", "Independent_185_9": "Independent_185_9", "Independent_185_10": "Independent_185_10", "Independent_185_11": "Independent_185_11", "Independent_185_12": "Independent_185_12", "Independent_185_13": "Independent_185_13", "Independent_186_1": "Independent_186_1", "Independent_186_2": "Independent_186_2", "Independent_186_3": "Independent_186_3", "Independent_186_4": "Independent_186_4", "Independent_186_5": "Independent_186_5", "Independent_186_6": "Independent_186_6", "Independent_186_7": "Independent_186_7", "Independent_187_1": "Independent_187_1", "Independent_187_2": "Independent_187_2", "Independent_187_3": "Independent_187_3", "Independent_187_4": "Independent_187_4", "Independent_188_1": "Independent_188_1", "Independent_188_2": "Independent_188_2", "Independent_188_3": "Independent_188_3", "Independent_188_4": "Independent_188_4", "Independent_188_5": "Independent_188_5", "Independent_188_6": "Independent_188_6", "Independent_189_1": "Independent_189_1", "Independent_190_1": "Independent_190_1", "Independent_190_2": "Independent_190_2", "Independent_190_3": "Independent_190_3", "Independent_190_4": "Independent_190_4", "Independent_190_5": "Independent_190_5", "Independent_190_6": "Independent_190_6", "Independent_190_7": "Independent_190_7", "Independent_190_8": "Independent_190_8", "Independent_190_9": "Independent_190_9", "Independent_190_10": "Independent_190_10", "Independent_190_11": "Independent_190_11", "Independent_190_12": "Independent_190_12", "Independent_190_13": "Independent_190_13", "Independent_191_1": "Independent_191_1", "Independent_191_2": "Independent_191_2", "Independent_192_1": "Independent_192_1", "Independent_192_2": "Independent_192_2", "Independent_192_3": "Independent_192_3", "Independent_192_4": "Independent_192_4", "Independent_192_5": "Independent_192_5", "Independent_192_6": "Independent_192_6", "Independent_192_7": "Independent_192_7", "Independent_193_1": "Independent_193_1", "Independent_193_2": "Independent_193_2", "Independent_193_3": "Independent_193_3", "Independent_194_1": "Independent_194_1", "Independent_195_1": "Independent_195_1", "Independent_195_2": "Independent_195_2", "HIPPA": "HIPPA", "Independent_195_3": "Independent_195_3", "Independent_196_1": "Independent_196_1", "Independent_196_2": "Independent_196_2", "Independent_196_3": "Independent_196_3", "Independent_197_1": "Independent_197_1", "Independent_197_2": "Independent_197_2", "Independent_197_3": "Independent_197_3", "Independent_197_4": "Independent_197_4", "Independent_197_5": "Independent_197_5", "Independent_198_1": "Independent_198_1", "Independent_198_2": "Independent_198_2", "Independent_198_3": "Independent_198_3", "Independent_198_4": "Independent_198_4", "Independent_198_5": "Independent_198_5", "Independent_198_6": "Independent_198_6", "Independent_199_1": "Independent_199_1", "Independent_199_2": "Independent_199_2", "Independent_199_3": "Independent_199_3", "Independent_199_4": "Independent_199_4", "Independent_199_5": "Independent_199_5", "Independent_199_6": "Independent_199_6", "Independent_199_7": "Independent_199_7", "Independent_199_8": "Independent_199_8", "Independent_199_9": "Independent_199_9", "Independent_199_10": "Independent_199_10", "Independent_200_1": "Independent_200_1", "Independent_200_2": "Independent_200_2", "Independent_200_3": "Independent_200_3", "LAP": "LAP", "Independent_200_4": "Independent_200_4", "Independent_200_5": "Independent_200_5", "Independent_200_6": "Independent_200_6", "Independent_200_7": "Independent_200_7", "Independent_200_8": "Independent_200_8", "Independent_200_9": "Independent_200_9", "Independent_200_10": "Independent_200_10", "Independent_200_11": "Independent_200_11", "Independent_200_12": "Independent_200_12", "Independent_200_13": "Independent_200_13", "Independent_201_1": "Independent_201_1", "Independent_201_2": "Independent_201_2", "Independent_201_3": "Independent_201_3", "Independent_201_4": "Independent_201_4", "Independent_201_5": "Independent_201_5", "Independent_201_6": "Independent_201_6", "Independent_201_7": "Independent_201_7", "Independent_201_8": "Independent_201_8", "Independent_202_1": "Independent_202_1", "Independent_202_2": "Independent_202_2", "Independent_202_3": "Independent_202_3", "Independent_202_4": "Independent_202_4", "Independent_202_5": "Independent_202_5", "Independent_202_6": "Independent_202_6", "Independent_202_7": "Independent_202_7", "Independent_202_8": "Independent_202_8", "Independent_202_9": "Independent_202_9", "Independent_203_1": "Independent_203_1", "Independent_203_2": "Independent_203_2", "Independent_203_3": "Independent_203_3", "Independent_204_1": "Independent_204_1", "Independent_204_2": "Independent_204_2", "Independent_204_3": "Independent_204_3", "Independent_205_1": "Independent_205_1", "Independent_205_2": "Independent_205_2", "Independent_205_3": "Independent_205_3", "Independent_205_4": "Independent_205_4", "Independent_205_5": "Independent_205_5", "Independent_205_6": "Independent_205_6", "Independent_205_7": "Independent_205_7", "Independent_205_8": "Independent_205_8", "Independent_205_9": "Independent_205_9", "Independent_205_10": "Independent_205_10", "Independent_205_11": "Independent_205_11", "Independent_205_12": "Independent_205_12", "BNS": "BNS", "Independent_205_13": "Independent_205_13", "Independent_205_14": "Independent_205_14", "Independent_205_15": "Independent_205_15", "Independent_205_16": "Independent_205_16", "Independent_206_1": "Independent_206_1", "Independent_206_2": "Independent_206_2", "RBSP": "RBSP", "Independent_206_3": "Independent_206_3", "Independent_206_4": "Independent_206_4", "Independent_206_5": "Independent_206_5", "Independent_206_6": "Independent_206_6", "Independent_206_7": "Independent_206_7", "Independent_206_8": "Independent_206_8", "Independent_206_9": "Independent_206_9", "Independent_206_10": "Independent_206_10", "Independent_206_11": "Independent_206_11", "Independent_206_12": "Independent_206_12", "Independent_206_13": "Independent_206_13", "Independent_206_14": "Independent_206_14", "Independent_207_1": "Independent_207_1", "Independent_207_2": "Independent_207_2", "Independent_207_3": "Independent_207_3", "Independent_207_4": "Independent_207_4", "Independent_207_5": "Independent_207_5", "Independent_207_6": "Independent_207_6", "Independent_207_7": "Independent_207_7", "Independent_207_8": "Independent_207_8", "Independent_208_1": "Independent_208_1", "Independent_208_2": "Independent_208_2", "Independent_208_3": "Independent_208_3", "Independent_208_4": "Independent_208_4", "Independent_208_5": "Independent_208_5", "Independent_208_6": "Independent_208_6", "Independent_208_7": "Independent_208_7", "Independent_209_1": "Independent_209_1", "Independent_209_2": "Independent_209_2", "Independent_209_3": "Independent_209_3", "Independent_209_4": "Independent_209_4", "Independent_209_5": "Independent_209_5", "Independent_209_6": "Independent_209_6", "Independent_209_7": "Independent_209_7", "Independent_209_8": "Independent_209_8", "Independent_209_9": "Independent_209_9", "Independent_210_1": "Independent_210_1", "Independent_210_2": "Independent_210_2", "Independent_210_3": "Independent_210_3", "Independent_210_4": "Independent_210_4", "Independent_210_5": "Independent_210_5", "Independent_210_6": "Independent_210_6", "Independent_211_1": "Independent_211_1", "Independent_211_2": "Independent_211_2", "Independent_211_3": "Independent_211_3", "Independent_211_4": "Independent_211_4", "Independent_211_5": "Independent_211_5", "Independent_212_1": "Independent_212_1", "Independent_212_2": "Independent_212_2", "Independent_212_3": "Independent_212_3", "Independent_212_4": "Independent_212_4", "Independent_212_5": "Independent_212_5", "Independent_213_1": "Independent_213_1", "Independent_213_2": "Independent_213_2", "Independent_213_3": "Independent_213_3", "Independent_213_4": "Independent_213_4", "Independent_213_5": "Independent_213_5", "SNS": "SNS", "Independent_213_6": "Independent_213_6", "Independent_214_1": "Independent_214_1", "Independent_214_2": "Independent_214_2", "Independent_214_3": "Independent_214_3", "Independent_214_4": "Independent_214_4", "Independent_214_5": "Independent_214_5", "Independent_214_6": "Independent_214_6", "Independent_214_7": "Independent_214_7", "Independent_215_1": "Independent_215_1", "Independent_215_2": "Independent_215_2", "Independent_215_3": "Independent_215_3", "Independent_215_4": "Independent_215_4", "Independent_215_5": "Independent_215_5", "Independent_217_1": "Independent_217_1", "Independent_217_2": "Independent_217_2", "Independent_217_3": "Independent_217_3", "Independent_217_4": "Independent_217_4", "Independent_218_1": "Independent_218_1", "Independent_218_2": "Independent_218_2", "Independent_219_1": "Independent_219_1", "Independent_219_2": "Independent_219_2", "Independent_219_3": "Independent_219_3", "Independent_219_4": "Independent_219_4", "Independent_219_5": "Independent_219_5", "Independent_219_6": "Independent_219_6", "Independent_219_7": "Independent_219_7", "Independent_219_8": "Independent_219_8", "Independent_219_9": "Independent_219_9", "Independent_219_10": "Independent_219_10", "Independent_220_1": "Independent_220_1", "Independent_220_2": "Independent_220_2", "Independent_220_3": "Independent_220_3", "Independent_220_4": "Independent_220_4", "Independent_220_5": "Independent_220_5", "Independent_220_6": "Independent_220_6", "Independent_220_7": "Independent_220_7", "Independent_221_1": "Independent_221_1", "Independent_221_2": "Independent_221_2", "Independent_221_3": "Independent_221_3", "Independent_221_4": "Independent_221_4", "Independent_222_1": "Independent_222_1", "Independent_222_2": "Independent_222_2", "Independent_222_3": "Independent_222_3", "Independent_222_4": "Independent_222_4", "Independent_222_5": "Independent_222_5", "Independent_223_1": "Independent_223_1", "Independent_223_2": "Independent_223_2", "Independent_223_3": "Independent_223_3", "Independent_223_4": "Independent_223_4", "Independent_223_5": "Independent_223_5", "Independent_223_6": "Independent_223_6", "Independent_224_1": "Independent_224_1", "Independent_224_2": "Independent_224_2", "Independent_224_3": "Independent_224_3", "Independent_224_4": "Independent_224_4", "NSAMP": "NSAMP", "Independent_224_5": "Independent_224_5", "Independent_225_1": "Independent_225_1", "Independent_225_2": "Independent_225_2", "Independent_225_3": "Independent_225_3", "Independent_225_4": "Independent_225_4", "Independent_225_5": "Independent_225_5", "Independent_226_1": "Independent_226_1", "Independent_226_2": "Independent_226_2", "Independent_226_3": "Independent_226_3", "Independent_226_4": "Independent_226_4", "Independent_226_5": "Independent_226_5", "Independent_226_6": "Independent_226_6", "Independent_226_7": "Independent_226_7", "Independent_226_8": "Independent_226_8", "Independent_226_9": "Independent_226_9", "Independent_227_1": "Independent_227_1", "Independent_227_2": "Independent_227_2", "Independent_227_3": "Independent_227_3", "Independent_227_4": "Independent_227_4", "Independent_227_5": "Independent_227_5", "Independent_227_6": "Independent_227_6", "Independent_228_1": "Independent_228_1", "Independent_228_2": "Independent_228_2", "Independent_228_3": "Independent_228_3", "Independent_228_4": "Independent_228_4", "Independent_229_1": "Independent_229_1", "Independent_229_2": "Independent_229_2", "Independent_229_3": "Independent_229_3", "Independent_229_4": "Independent_229_4", "Independent_229_5": "Independent_229_5", "Independent_229_6": "Independent_229_6", "Independent_229_7": "Independent_229_7", "Independent_229_8": "Independent_229_8", "Independent_229_9": "Independent_229_9", "Independent_229_10": "Independent_229_10", "Independent_229_11": "Independent_229_11", "Independent_229_12": "Independent_229_12", "Independent_229_13": "Independent_229_13", "Independent_229_14": "Independent_229_14", "Independent_229_15": "Independent_229_15", "Independent_229_16": "Independent_229_16", "Independent_230_1": "Independent_230_1", "Independent_230_2": "Independent_230_2", "Independent_230_3": "Independent_230_3", "Independent_230_4": "Independent_230_4", "Independent_230_5": "Independent_230_5", "Independent_230_6": "Independent_230_6", "Independent_230_7": "Independent_230_7", "Independent_230_8": "Independent_230_8", "Independent_230_9": "Independent_230_9", "Independent_230_10": "Independent_230_10", "Independent_230_11": "Independent_230_11", "Independent_230_12": "Independent_230_12", "Independent_230_13": "Independent_230_13", "Independent_230_14": "Independent_230_14", "Independent_230_15": "Independent_230_15", "Independent_231_1": "Independent_231_1", "Independent_231_2": "Independent_231_2", "Independent_231_3": "Independent_231_3", "Independent_231_4": "Independent_231_4", "Independent_232_1": "Independent_232_1", "Independent_232_2": "Independent_232_2", "Independent_232_3": "Independent_232_3", "Independent_232_4": "Independent_232_4", "Independent_232_5": "Independent_232_5", "Independent_232_6": "Independent_232_6", "Independent_232_7": "Independent_232_7", "Independent_232_8": "Independent_232_8", "Independent_232_9": "Independent_232_9", "Independent_233_1": "Independent_233_1", "Independent_233_2": "Independent_233_2", "Independent_233_3": "Independent_233_3", "Independent_233_4": "Independent_233_4", "Independent_233_5": "Independent_233_5", "Independent_233_6": "Independent_233_6", "Independent_233_7": "Independent_233_7", "Independent_233_8": "Independent_233_8", "Independent_234_1": "Independent_234_1", "Independent_234_2": "Independent_234_2", "Independent_234_3": "Independent_234_3", "Independent_234_4": "Independent_234_4", "Independent_234_5": "Independent_234_5", "Independent_234_6": "Independent_234_6", "Independent_235_1": "Independent_235_1", "Independent_235_2": "Independent_235_2", "MVA": "MVA", "Independent_235_3": "Independent_235_3", "Independent_235_4": "Independent_235_4", "Independent_235_5": "Independent_235_5", "Independent_235_6": "Independent_235_6", "Independent_235_7": "Independent_235_7", "Independent_235_8": "Independent_235_8", "Independent_235_9": "Independent_235_9", "Independent_235_10": "Independent_235_10", "Independent_235_11": "Independent_235_11", "Independent_235_12": "Independent_235_12", "Independent_235_13": "Independent_235_13", "Independent_235_14": "Independent_235_14", "Independent_235_15": "Independent_235_15", "Independent_236_1": "Independent_236_1", "Independent_236_2": "Independent_236_2", "Independent_236_3": "Independent_236_3", "Independent_236_4": "Independent_236_4", "Independent_237_1": "Independent_237_1", "Independent_237_2": "Independent_237_2", "Independent_237_3": "Independent_237_3", "Independent_238_1": "Independent_238_1", "Independent_238_2": "Independent_238_2", "Independent_238_3": "Independent_238_3", "Independent_238_4": "Independent_238_4", "Independent_238_5": "Independent_238_5", "Independent_238_6": "Independent_238_6", "Independent_239_1": "Independent_239_1", "Independent_239_2": "Independent_239_2", "Independent_239_3": "Independent_239_3", "Independent_239_4": "Independent_239_4", "Independent_239_5": "Independent_239_5", "Independent_239_6": "Independent_239_6", "Independent_239_7": "Independent_239_7", "Independent_240_1": "Independent_240_1", "Independent_240_2": "Independent_240_2", "Independent_240_3": "Independent_240_3", "Independent_240_4": "Independent_240_4", "Independent_240_5": "Independent_240_5", "Independent_241_1": "Independent_241_1", "Independent_241_2": "Independent_241_2", "Independent_241_3": "Independent_241_3", "Independent_241_4": "Independent_241_4", "Independent_241_5": "Independent_241_5", "Independent_242_1": "Independent_242_1", "Independent_242_2": "Independent_242_2", "Independent_242_3": "Independent_242_3", "Independent_242_4": "Independent_242_4", "Independent_242_5": "Independent_242_5", "Independent_242_6": "Independent_242_6", "Independent_242_7": "Independent_242_7", "Independent_242_8": "Independent_242_8", "Independent_243_1": "Independent_243_1", "Independent_243_2": "Independent_243_2", "Independent_243_3": "Independent_243_3", "Independent_244_1": "Independent_244_1", "Independent_244_2": "Independent_244_2", "Independent_244_3": "Independent_244_3", "Independent_244_4": "Independent_244_4", "Independent_244_5": "Independent_244_5", "Independent_244_6": "Independent_244_6", "Independent_245_1": "Independent_245_1", "Independent_245_2": "Independent_245_2", "Independent_245_3": "Independent_245_3", "Independent_245_4": "Independent_245_4", "Independent_245_5": "Independent_245_5", "Independent_245_6": "Independent_245_6", "Independent_245_7": "Independent_245_7", "Independent_246_1": "Independent_246_1", "Independent_246_2": "Independent_246_2", "Independent_246_3": "Independent_246_3", "BHCP": "BHCP", "Independent_246_4": "Independent_246_4", "Independent_246_5": "Independent_246_5", "Independent_247_1": "Independent_247_1", "Independent_247_2": "Independent_247_2", "Independent_247_3": "Independent_247_3", "Independent_247_4": "Independent_247_4", "Independent_247_5": "Independent_247_5", "Independent_247_6": "Independent_247_6", "Independent_247_7": "Independent_247_7", "Independent_247_8": "Independent_247_8", "Independent_247_9": "Independent_247_9", "Independent_248_1": "Independent_248_1", "Independent_248_2": "Independent_248_2", "Independent_248_3": "Independent_248_3", "Independent_248_4": "Independent_248_4", "Independent_248_5": "Independent_248_5", "Independent_248_6": "Independent_248_6", "Independent_248_7": "Independent_248_7", "Independent_248_8": "Independent_248_8", "Independent_248_9": "Independent_248_9", "Independent_248_10": "Independent_248_10", "Independent_248_11": "Independent_248_11", "Independent_249_1": "Independent_249_1", "Independent_249_2": "Independent_249_2", "Independent_249_3": "Independent_249_3", "Independent_249_4": "Independent_249_4", "Independent_249_5": "Independent_249_5", "Independent_249_6": "Independent_249_6", "Independent_249_7": "Independent_249_7", "Independent_249_8": "Independent_249_8", "Independent_249_9": "Independent_249_9", "Independent_249_10": "Independent_249_10", "Independent_249_11": "Independent_249_11", "Independent_249_12": "Independent_249_12", "Independent_249_13": "Independent_249_13", "Independent_249_14": "Independent_249_14", "Independent_249_15": "Independent_249_15", "Independent_249_16": "Independent_249_16", "Independent_249_17": "Independent_249_17", "Independent_250_1": "Independent_250_1", "Independent_250_2": "Independent_250_2", "Independent_250_3": "Independent_250_3", "Independent_250_4": "Independent_250_4", "Independent_251_1": "Independent_251_1", "Independent_251_2": "Independent_251_2", "Independent_251_3": "Independent_251_3", "Independent_251_4": "Independent_251_4", "Independent_251_5": "Independent_251_5", "Independent_251_6": "Independent_251_6", "Independent_251_7": "Independent_251_7", "Independent_251_8": "Independent_251_8", "Independent_251_9": "Independent_251_9", "Independent_251_10": "Independent_251_10", "Independent_251_11": "Independent_251_11", "Independent_251_12": "Independent_251_12", "Independent_251_13": "Independent_251_13", "Independent_251_14": "Independent_251_14", "Independent_251_15": "Independent_251_15", "Independent_251_16": "Independent_251_16", "Independent_251_17": "Independent_251_17", "Independent_251_18": "Independent_251_18", "Independent_251_19": "Independent_251_19", "Independent_251_20": "Independent_251_20", "Independent_252_1": "Independent_252_1", "Independent_252_2": "Independent_252_2", "Independent_252_3": "Independent_252_3", "Independent_252_4": "Independent_252_4", "Independent_252_5": "Independent_252_5", "Independent_252_6": "Independent_252_6", "Independent_252_7": "Independent_252_7", "Independent_252_8": "Independent_252_8", "Independent_252_9": "Independent_252_9", "Independent_252_10": "Independent_252_10", "Independent_252_11": "Independent_252_11", "Independent_252_12": "Independent_252_12", "Independent_253_1": "Independent_253_1", "Independent_253_2": "Independent_253_2", "Independent_253_3": "Independent_253_3", "Independent_253_4": "Independent_253_4", "Independent_253_5": "Independent_253_5", "Independent_253_6": "Independent_253_6", "Independent_253_7": "Independent_253_7", "Independent_253_8": "Independent_253_8", "Independent_254_1": "Independent_254_1", "Independent_254_2": "Independent_254_2", "Independent_254_3": "Independent_254_3", "Independent_254_4": "Independent_254_4", "Independent_254_5": "Independent_254_5", "Independent_254_6": "Independent_254_6", "Independent_254_7": "Independent_254_7", "Independent_254_8": "Independent_254_8", "Independent_254_9": "Independent_254_9", "Independent_254_10": "Independent_254_10", "Independent_254_11": "Independent_254_11", "Independent_254_12": "Independent_254_12", "Independent_254_13": "Independent_254_13", "Independent_254_14": "Independent_254_14", "Independent_255_1": "Independent_255_1", "Independent_255_2": "Independent_255_2", "Independent_255_3": "Independent_255_3", "Independent_255_4": "Independent_255_4", "Independent_255_5": "Independent_255_5", "Independent_255_6": "Independent_255_6", "Independent_255_7": "Independent_255_7", "Independent_256_1": "Independent_256_1", "Independent_256_2": "Independent_256_2", "Independent_256_3": "Independent_256_3", "Independent_256_4": "Independent_256_4", "Independent_257_1": "Independent_257_1", "Independent_258_1": "Independent_258_1", "Independent_258_2": "Independent_258_2", "Independent_258_3": "Independent_258_3", "Independent_258_4": "Independent_258_4", "Independent_258_5": "Independent_258_5", "Independent_258_6": "Independent_258_6", "Independent_260_1": "Independent_260_1", "Independent_260_2": "Independent_260_2", "Independent_260_3": "Independent_260_3", "Independent_260_4": "Independent_260_4", "Independent_260_5": "Independent_260_5", "Independent_261_1": "Independent_261_1", "Independent_261_2": "Independent_261_2", "Independent_261_3": "Independent_261_3", "Independent_261_4": "Independent_261_4", "Independent_261_5": "Independent_261_5", "Independent_261_6": "Independent_261_6", "Independent_262_1": "Independent_262_1", "Independent_262_2": "Independent_262_2", "Independent_263_1": "Independent_263_1", "Independent_263_2": "Independent_263_2", "Independent_263_3": "Independent_263_3", "Independent_265_1": "Independent_265_1", "Independent_265_2": "Independent_265_2", "Independent_266_1": "Independent_266_1", "Independent_266_2": "Independent_266_2", "Independent_266_3": "Independent_266_3", "Independent_266_4": "Independent_266_4", "Independent_266_5": "Independent_266_5", "Independent_267_1": "Independent_267_1", "Independent_268_1": "Independent_268_1", "Independent_268_2": "Independent_268_2", "Independent_269_1": "Independent_269_1", "Independent_270_1": "Independent_270_1", "Independent_270_2": "Independent_270_2", "Independent_270_3": "Independent_270_3", "Independent_271_1": "Independent_271_1", "Independent_271_2": "Independent_271_2", "Independent_271_3": "Independent_271_3", "Independent_271_4": "Independent_271_4", "Independent_271_5": "Independent_271_5", "Independent_271_6": "Independent_271_6", "Independent_271_7": "Independent_271_7", "Independent_272_1": "Independent_272_1", "Independent_272_2": "Independent_272_2", "Independent_272_3": "Independent_272_3", "Independent_273_1": "Independent_273_1", "Independent_273_2": "Independent_273_2", "Independent_274_1": "Independent_274_1", "Independent_274_2": "Independent_274_2", "Independent_274_3": "Independent_274_3", "Independent_274_4": "Independent_274_4", "Independent_275_1": "Independent_275_1", "Independent_275_2": "Independent_275_2", "Independent_276_1": "Independent_276_1", "Independent_276_2": "Independent_276_2", "Independent_276_3": "Independent_276_3", "Independent_276_4": "Independent_276_4", "Independent_276_5": "Independent_276_5", "Independent_276_6": "Independent_276_6", "Independent_276_7": "Independent_276_7", "Independent_276_8": "Independent_276_8", "Independent_276_9": "Independent_276_9", "Independent_277_1": "Independent_277_1", "Independent_277_2": "Independent_277_2", "Independent_277_3": "Independent_277_3", "Independent_278_1": "Independent_278_1", "Independent_278_2": "Independent_278_2", "Independent_278_3": "Independent_278_3", "JJP": "JJP", "Independent_279_1": "Independent_279_1", "Independent_279_2": "Independent_279_2", "Independent_279_3": "Independent_279_3", "Independent_280_1": "Independent_280_1", "Independent_280_2": "Independent_280_2", "Independent_280_3": "Independent_280_3", "Independent_281_1": "Independent_281_1", "Independent_281_2": "Independent_281_2", "Independent_281_3": "Independent_281_3", "Independent_281_4": "Independent_281_4", "Independent_281_5": "Independent_281_5", "Independent_281_6": "Independent_281_6", "Independent_281_7": "Independent_281_7", "Independent_281_8": "Independent_281_8", "Independent_281_9": "Independent_281_9", "Independent_282_1": "Independent_282_1", "Independent_282_2": "Independent_282_2", "Independent_282_3": "Independent_282_3", "Independent_282_4": "Independent_282_4", "Independent_282_5": "Independent_282_5", "Independent_282_6": "Independent_282_6", "Independent_282_7": "Independent_282_7", "Independent_282_8": "Independent_282_8", "Independent_282_9": "Independent_282_9", "Independent_282_10": "Independent_282_10", "Independent_282_11": "Independent_282_11", "Independent_283_1": "Independent_283_1", "Independent_283_2": "Independent_283_2", "Independent_283_3": "Independent_283_3", "Independent_283_4": "Independent_283_4", "Independent_283_5": "Independent_283_5", "Independent_283_6": "Independent_283_6", "Independent_283_7": "Independent_283_7", "Independent_283_8": "Independent_283_8", "Independent_283_9": "Independent_283_9", "Independent_284_1": "Independent_284_1", "Independent_284_2": "Independent_284_2", "Independent_284_3": "Independent_284_3", "Independent_284_4": "Independent_284_4", "Independent_285_1": "Independent_285_1", "Independent_285_2": "Independent_285_2", "Independent_285_3": "Independent_285_3", "Independent_285_4": "Independent_285_4", "Independent_286_1": "Independent_286_1", "Independent_286_2": "Independent_286_2", "Independent_286_3": "Independent_286_3", "Independent_286_4": "Independent_286_4", "Independent_286_5": "Independent_286_5", "Independent_287_1": "Independent_287_1", "Independent_287_2": "Independent_287_2", "Independent_287_3": "Independent_287_3", "Independent_287_4": "Independent_287_4", "Independent_287_5": "Independent_287_5", "Independent_287_6": "Independent_287_6", "Independent_287_7": "Independent_287_7", "Independent_287_8": "Independent_287_8", "Independent_288_1": "Independent_288_1", "Independent_288_2": "Independent_288_2", "Independent_288_3": "Independent_288_3", "Independent_288_4": "Independent_288_4"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 288, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 288, "registered_not_positive": 288}, "n_stations_flagged": 288, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:52:54.496715", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.604, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.56, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.617, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.488, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.069, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.658, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.275, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.617, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.617, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.488, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.818, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.576, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.576, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 288}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d8d05026bf514a80a54848c0b01c3793", "name": "India 2011 local (overnight india_tamil_nadu_2011_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2011, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Tamil_Nadu/Tamil_Nadu_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"BJP": "BJP", "BSP": "BSP", "DMDK": "DMDK", "JMM": "JMM", "PB": "PB", "PMK": "PMK", "RPI": "RPI", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "Independent_1_3": "Independent_1_3", "Independent_1_4": "Independent_1_4", "Independent_1_5": "Independent_1_5", "ADMK": "ADMK", "DMK": "DMK", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "Independent_2_3": "Independent_2_3", "Independent_2_4": "Independent_2_4", "Independent_2_5": "Independent_2_5", "Independent_2_6": "Independent_2_6", "IJK": "IJK", "INC": "INC", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "Independent_3_3": "Independent_3_3", "Independent_3_4": "Independent_3_4", "Independent_3_5": "Independent_3_5", "Independent_3_6": "Independent_3_6", "RJD": "RJD", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "Independent_4_4": "Independent_4_4", "Independent_4_5": "Independent_4_5", "Independent_4_6": "Independent_4_6", "Independent_4_7": "Independent_4_7", "Independent_4_8": "Independent_4_8", "Independent_4_9": "Independent_4_9", "Independent_4_10": "Independent_4_10", "Independent_4_11": "Independent_4_11", "Independent_4_12": "Independent_4_12", "Independent_4_13": "Independent_4_13", "Independent_4_14": "Independent_4_14", "Independent_4_15": "Independent_4_15", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "LSP": "LSP", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "Independent_6_2": "Independent_6_2", "Independent_6_3": "Independent_6_3", "Independent_6_4": "Independent_6_4", "Independent_6_5": "Independent_6_5", "Independent_6_6": "Independent_6_6", "Independent_6_7": "Independent_6_7", "Independent_6_8": "Independent_6_8", "Independent_6_9": "Independent_6_9", "Independent_6_10": "Independent_6_10", "Independent_6_11": "Independent_6_11", "Independent_6_12": "Independent_6_12", "CPM": "CPM", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "Independent_7_2": "Independent_7_2", "Independent_7_3": "Independent_7_3", "Independent_7_4": "Independent_7_4", "Independent_7_5": "Independent_7_5", "Independent_7_6": "Independent_7_6", "Independent_7_7": "Independent_7_7", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "Independent_8_3": "Independent_8_3", "Independent_8_4": "Independent_8_4", "Independent_8_5": "Independent_8_5", "Independent_8_6": "Independent_8_6", "Independent_8_7": "Independent_8_7", "Independent_8_8": "Independent_8_8", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "Independent_9_2": "Independent_9_2", "Independent_9_3": "Independent_9_3", "Independent_9_4": "Independent_9_4", "Independent_9_5": "Independent_9_5", "Independent_9_6": "Independent_9_6", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "Independent_10_3": "Independent_10_3", "Independent_10_4": "Independent_10_4", "Independent_10_5": "Independent_10_5", "MMKA": "MMKA", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "Independent_11_3": "Independent_11_3", "Independent_11_4": "Independent_11_4", "Independent_11_5": "Independent_11_5", "Independent_11_6": "Independent_11_6", "Independent_11_7": "Independent_11_7", "Independent_11_8": "Independent_11_8", "Independent_11_9": "Independent_11_9", "Independent_11_10": "Independent_11_10", "Independent_11_11": "Independent_11_11", "Independent_11_12": "Independent_11_12", "Independent_11_13": "Independent_11_13", "Independent_11_14": "Independent_11_14", "Independent_11_15": "Independent_11_15", "Independent_11_16": "Independent_11_16", "Independent_11_17": "Independent_11_17", "Independent_11_18": "Independent_11_18", "Independent_11_19": "Independent_11_19", "Independent_11_20": "Independent_11_20", "Independent_11_21": "Independent_11_21", "Independent_11_22": "Independent_11_22", "Independent_11_23": "Independent_11_23", "Independent_11_24": "Independent_11_24", "Independent_11_25": "Independent_11_25", "MSK": "MSK", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "Independent_12_3": "Independent_12_3", "Independent_12_4": "Independent_12_4", "Independent_12_5": "Independent_12_5", "Independent_12_6": "Independent_12_6", "Independent_12_7": "Independent_12_7", "Independent_12_8": "Independent_12_8", "Independent_12_9": "Independent_12_9", "Independent_12_10": "Independent_12_10", "Independent_12_11": "Independent_12_11", "Independent_12_12": "Independent_12_12", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "Independent_13_3": "Independent_13_3", "Independent_13_4": "Independent_13_4", "Independent_13_5": "Independent_13_5", "Independent_13_6": "Independent_13_6", "Independent_13_7": "Independent_13_7", "Independent_13_8": "Independent_13_8", "Independent_13_9": "Independent_13_9", "Independent_13_10": "Independent_13_10", "Independent_13_11": "Independent_13_11", "Independent_13_12": "Independent_13_12", "Independent_13_13": "Independent_13_13", "Independent_13_14": "Independent_13_14", "Independent_13_15": "Independent_13_15", "Independent_13_16": "Independent_13_16", "Independent_13_17": "Independent_13_17", "Independent_13_18": "Independent_13_18", "Independent_13_19": "Independent_13_19", "Independent_13_20": "Independent_13_20", "Independent_13_21": "Independent_13_21", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "Independent_14_3": "Independent_14_3", "Independent_14_4": "Independent_14_4", "Independent_14_5": "Independent_14_5", "Independent_14_6": "Independent_14_6", "Independent_14_7": "Independent_14_7", "Independent_14_8": "Independent_14_8", "LJP": "LJP", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_15_2": "Independent_15_2", "Independent_15_3": "Independent_15_3", "Independent_15_4": "Independent_15_4", "Independent_15_5": "Independent_15_5", "Independent_15_6": "Independent_15_6", "Independent_15_7": "Independent_15_7", "Independent_15_8": "Independent_15_8", "Independent_15_9": "Independent_15_9", "Independent_15_10": "Independent_15_10", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_16_2": "Independent_16_2", "Independent_16_3": "Independent_16_3", "Independent_16_4": "Independent_16_4", "Independent_16_5": "Independent_16_5", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "Independent_17_3": "Independent_17_3", "Independent_17_4": "Independent_17_4", "Independent_17_5": "Independent_17_5", "Independent_17_6": "Independent_17_6", "Independent_17_7": "Independent_17_7", "Independent_17_8": "Independent_17_8", "Independent_17_9": "Independent_17_9", "SDPI": "SDPI", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_18_3": "Independent_18_3", "Independent_18_4": "Independent_18_4", "Independent_18_5": "Independent_18_5", "Independent_18_6": "Independent_18_6", "Independent_18_7": "Independent_18_7", "Independent_18_8": "Independent_18_8", "Independent_18_9": "Independent_18_9", "INL": "INL", "MAMAK": "MAMAK", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "Independent_19_3": "Independent_19_3", "Independent_19_4": "Independent_19_4", "Independent_19_5": "Independent_19_5", "Independent_19_6": "Independent_19_6", "Independent_19_7": "Independent_19_7", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_20_2": "Independent_20_2", "Independent_20_3": "Independent_20_3", "Independent_20_4": "Independent_20_4", "Independent_20_5": "Independent_20_5", "Independent_20_6": "Independent_20_6", "Independent_20_7": "Independent_20_7", "Independent_20_8": "Independent_20_8", "Independent_20_9": "Independent_20_9", "Independent_20_10": "Independent_20_10", "YSP": "YSP", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_21_2": "Independent_21_2", "Independent_21_3": "Independent_21_3", "Independent_21_4": "Independent_21_4", "Independent_21_5": "Independent_21_5", "Independent_21_6": "Independent_21_6", "Independent_21_7": "Independent_21_7", "Independent_21_8": "Independent_21_8", "Independent_21_9": "Independent_21_9", "Independent_21_10": "Independent_21_10", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_22_2": "Independent_22_2", "Independent_22_3": "Independent_22_3", "Independent_22_4": "Independent_22_4", "Independent_22_5": "Independent_22_5", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_23_2": "Independent_23_2", "Independent_23_3": "Independent_23_3", "Independent_23_4": "Independent_23_4", "Independent_23_5": "Independent_23_5", "Independent_23_6": "Independent_23_6", "Independent_23_7": "Independent_23_7", "Independent_23_8": "Independent_23_8", "Independent_23_9": "Independent_23_9", "Independent_23_10": "Independent_23_10", "Independent_23_11": "Independent_23_11", "Independent_23_12": "Independent_23_12", "Independent_23_13": "Independent_23_13", "Independent_23_14": "Independent_23_14", "SUCI": "SUCI", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "Independent_24_2": "Independent_24_2", "Independent_24_3": "Independent_24_3", "Independent_24_4": "Independent_24_4", "Independent_24_5": "Independent_24_5", "Independent_24_6": "Independent_24_6", "Independent_24_7": "Independent_24_7", "Independent_24_8": "Independent_24_8", "Independent_24_9": "Independent_24_9", "Independent_24_10": "Independent_24_10", "Independent_24_11": "Independent_24_11", "Independent_24_12": "Independent_24_12", "JJ": "JJ", "PPIS": "PPIS", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "Independent_25_4": "Independent_25_4", "Independent_25_5": "Independent_25_5", "Independent_25_6": "Independent_25_6", "Independent_25_7": "Independent_25_7", "Independent_25_8": "Independent_25_8", "Independent_25_9": "Independent_25_9", "Independent_25_10": "Independent_25_10", "Independent_25_11": "Independent_25_11", "APM": "APM", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "Independent_26_3": "Independent_26_3", "Independent_26_4": "Independent_26_4", "Independent_26_5": "Independent_26_5", "MGRTK": "MGRTK", "VCK": "VCK", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "Independent_27_3": "Independent_27_3", "Independent_27_4": "Independent_27_4", "AIPPMR": "AIPPMR", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "Independent_28_4": "Independent_28_4", "Independent_28_5": "Independent_28_5", "Independent_28_6": "Independent_28_6", "Independent_28_7": "Independent_28_7", "Independent_28_8": "Independent_28_8", "Independent_28_9": "Independent_28_9", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "Independent_30_3": "Independent_30_3", "Independent_30_4": "Independent_30_4", "Independent_30_5": "Independent_30_5", "Independent_30_6": "Independent_30_6", "Independent_30_7": "Independent_30_7", "Independent_30_8": "Independent_30_8", "SHS": "SHS", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_31_2": "Independent_31_2", "Independent_31_3": "Independent_31_3", "Independent_31_4": "Independent_31_4", "Independent_31_5": "Independent_31_5", "Independent_31_6": "Independent_31_6", "Independent_31_7": "Independent_31_7", "AIJMK": "AIJMK", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_32_3": "Independent_32_3", "Independent_32_4": "Independent_32_4", "Independent_32_5": "Independent_32_5", "Independent_32_6": "Independent_32_6", "Independent_32_7": "Independent_32_7", "Independent_32_8": "Independent_32_8", "Independent_32_9": "Independent_32_9", "JMM(U)": "JMM(U)", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "Independent_33_4": "Independent_33_4", "Independent_33_5": "Independent_33_5", "Independent_33_6": "Independent_33_6", "Independent_33_7": "Independent_33_7", "Independent_33_8": "Independent_33_8", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_34_3": "Independent_34_3", "Independent_34_4": "Independent_34_4", "Independent_34_5": "Independent_34_5", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "Independent_35_2": "Independent_35_2", "Independent_35_3": "Independent_35_3", "Independent_35_4": "Independent_35_4", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_36_3": "Independent_36_3", "Independent_36_4": "Independent_36_4", "Independent_36_5": "Independent_36_5", "Independent_36_6": "Independent_36_6", "Independent_36_7": "Independent_36_7", "Independent_36_8": "Independent_36_8", "ADSMK": "ADSMK", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "Independent_37_3": "Independent_37_3", "Independent_37_4": "Independent_37_4", "Independent_37_5": "Independent_37_5", "Independent_37_6": "Independent_37_6", "Independent_37_7": "Independent_37_7", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_39_2": "Independent_39_2", "Independent_39_3": "Independent_39_3", "Independent_39_4": "Independent_39_4", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_40_3": "Independent_40_3", "Independent_40_4": "Independent_40_4", "Independent_40_5": "Independent_40_5", "Independent_40_6": "Independent_40_6", "Independent_40_7": "Independent_40_7", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "Independent_41_3": "Independent_41_3", "Independent_41_4": "Independent_41_4", "Independent_41_5": "Independent_41_5", "Independent_41_6": "Independent_41_6", "Independent_41_7": "Independent_41_7", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_42_2": "Independent_42_2", "Independent_42_3": "Independent_42_3", "Independent_42_4": "Independent_42_4", "Independent_42_5": "Independent_42_5", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_43_2": "Independent_43_2", "Independent_43_3": "Independent_43_3", "Independent_43_4": "Independent_43_4", "Independent_43_5": "Independent_43_5", "Independent_43_6": "Independent_43_6", "Independent_43_7": "Independent_43_7", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "Independent_44_3": "Independent_44_3", "Independent_44_4": "Independent_44_4", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_45_2": "Independent_45_2", "Independent_45_3": "Independent_45_3", "Independent_45_4": "Independent_45_4", "Independent_45_5": "Independent_45_5", "Independent_45_6": "Independent_45_6", "CPI": "CPI", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "Independent_46_3": "Independent_46_3", "Independent_46_4": "Independent_46_4", "Independent_46_5": "Independent_46_5", "Independent_46_6": "Independent_46_6", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_48_2": "Independent_48_2", "Independent_48_3": "Independent_48_3", "Independent_48_4": "Independent_48_4", "Independent_48_5": "Independent_48_5", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "Independent_49_3": "Independent_49_3", "Independent_49_4": "Independent_49_4", "Independent_49_5": "Independent_49_5", "Independent_49_6": "Independent_49_6", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_50_3": "Independent_50_3", "Independent_50_4": "Independent_50_4", "Independent_50_5": "Independent_50_5", "Independent_50_6": "Independent_50_6", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_51_3": "Independent_51_3", "Independent_51_4": "Independent_51_4", "UMK": "UMK", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "Independent_52_3": "Independent_52_3", "Independent_52_4": "Independent_52_4", "Independent_52_5": "Independent_52_5", "Independent_52_6": "Independent_52_6", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "Independent_53_2": "Independent_53_2", "Independent_53_3": "Independent_53_3", "Independent_53_4": "Independent_53_4", "Independent_53_5": "Independent_53_5", "Independent_53_6": "Independent_53_6", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_55_2": "Independent_55_2", "Independent_55_3": "Independent_55_3", "Independent_55_4": "Independent_55_4", "Independent_55_5": "Independent_55_5", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_56_2": "Independent_56_2", "Independent_56_3": "Independent_56_3", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_57_2": "Independent_57_2", "Independent_57_3": "Independent_57_3", "Independent_57_4": "Independent_57_4", "Independent_57_5": "Independent_57_5", "Independent_57_6": "Independent_57_6", "Independent_58_1": "Independent_58_1", "Independent_58_2": "Independent_58_2", "Independent_58_3": "Independent_58_3", "Independent_58_4": "Independent_58_4", "Independent_58_5": "Independent_58_5", "Independent_58_6": "Independent_58_6", "Independent_58_7": "Independent_58_7", "Independent_58_8": "Independent_58_8", "Independent_58_9": "Independent_58_9", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_59_2": "Independent_59_2", "Independent_59_3": "Independent_59_3", "Independent_59_4": "Independent_59_4", "Independent_59_5": "Independent_59_5", "Independent_59_6": "Independent_59_6", "Independent_59_7": "Independent_59_7", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "Independent_60_3": "Independent_60_3", "Independent_60_4": "Independent_60_4", "Independent_60_5": "Independent_60_5", "Independent_60_6": "Independent_60_6", "Independent_60_7": "Independent_60_7", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "Independent_61_3": "Independent_61_3", "Independent_61_4": "Independent_61_4", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_62_3": "Independent_62_3", "Independent_62_4": "Independent_62_4", "Independent_62_5": "Independent_62_5", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "Independent_63_3": "Independent_63_3", "Independent_63_4": "Independent_63_4", "Independent_63_5": "Independent_63_5", "Independent_63_6": "Independent_63_6", "Independent_63_7": "Independent_63_7", "Independent_63_8": "Independent_63_8", "Independent_63_9": "Independent_63_9", "Independent_63_10": "Independent_63_10", "Independent_63_11": "Independent_63_11", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_64_2": "Independent_64_2", "Independent_64_3": "Independent_64_3", "Independent_64_4": "Independent_64_4", "Independent_64_5": "Independent_64_5", "Independent_64_6": "Independent_64_6", "Independent_64_7": "Independent_64_7", "Independent_64_8": "Independent_64_8", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_65_2": "Independent_65_2", "Independent_65_3": "Independent_65_3", "Independent_65_4": "Independent_65_4", "Independent_65_5": "Independent_65_5", "Independent_65_6": "Independent_65_6", "Independent_65_7": "Independent_65_7", "Independent_65_8": "Independent_65_8", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_66_2": "Independent_66_2", "Independent_66_3": "Independent_66_3", "Independent_66_4": "Independent_66_4", "Independent_66_5": "Independent_66_5", "Independent_66_6": "Independent_66_6", "Independent_66_7": "Independent_66_7", "Independent_66_8": "Independent_66_8", "Independent_67_1": "Independent_67_1", "Independent_67_2": "Independent_67_2", "Independent_67_3": "Independent_67_3", "Independent_67_4": "Independent_67_4", "Independent_67_5": "Independent_67_5", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "Independent_68_3": "Independent_68_3", "Independent_68_4": "Independent_68_4", "Independent_68_5": "Independent_68_5", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_69_3": "Independent_69_3", "Independent_69_4": "Independent_69_4", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "Independent_70_2": "Independent_70_2", "Independent_70_3": "Independent_70_3", "Independent_70_4": "Independent_70_4", "Independent_70_5": "Independent_70_5", "Independent_70_6": "Independent_70_6", "Independent_71_1": "Independent_71_1", "Independent_71_2": "Independent_71_2", "Independent_71_3": "Independent_71_3", "Independent_71_4": "Independent_71_4", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_72_2": "Independent_72_2", "Independent_72_3": "Independent_72_3", "Independent_72_4": "Independent_72_4", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "Independent_73_3": "Independent_73_3", "Independent_73_4": "Independent_73_4", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_74_2": "Independent_74_2", "Independent_74_3": "Independent_74_3", "Independent_74_4": "Independent_74_4", "Independent_74_5": "Independent_74_5", "Independent_74_6": "Independent_74_6", "Independent_74_7": "Independent_74_7", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_75_2": "Independent_75_2", "Independent_75_3": "Independent_75_3", "Independent_75_4": "Independent_75_4", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_77_2": "Independent_77_2", "Independent_77_3": "Independent_77_3", "Independent_77_4": "Independent_77_4", "Independent_77_5": "Independent_77_5", "Independent_77_6": "Independent_77_6", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_78_2": "Independent_78_2", "Independent_78_3": "Independent_78_3", "Independent_78_4": "Independent_78_4", "Independent_79_1": "Independent_79_1", "Independent_79_2": "Independent_79_2", "Independent_79_3": "Independent_79_3", "Independent_79_4": "Independent_79_4", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_80_2": "Independent_80_2", "Independent_80_3": "Independent_80_3", "Independent_80_4": "Independent_80_4", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "Independent_81_2": "Independent_81_2", "Independent_81_3": "Independent_81_3", "Independent_81_4": "Independent_81_4", "Independent_82_1": "Independent_82_1", "Independent_82_2": "Independent_82_2", "Independent_82_3": "Independent_82_3", "Independent_82_4": "Independent_82_4", "Independent_82_5": "Independent_82_5", "Independent_82_6": "Independent_82_6", "Independent_82_7": "Independent_82_7", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_83_2": "Independent_83_2", "JKNPP": "JKNPP", "Independent_84_1": "Independent_84_1", "Independent_84_2": "Independent_84_2", "Independent_84_3": "Independent_84_3", "Independent_85_1": "Independent_85_1", "Independent_85_2": "Independent_85_2", "Independent_85_3": "Independent_85_3", "Independent_85_4": "Independent_85_4", "Independent_85_5": "Independent_85_5", "Independent_85_6": "Independent_85_6", "Independent_85_7": "Independent_85_7", "Independent_85_8": "Independent_85_8", "Independent_85_9": "Independent_85_9", "Independent_85_10": "Independent_85_10", "Independent_86_1": "Independent_86_1", "Independent_86_2": "Independent_86_2", "Independent_86_3": "Independent_86_3", "Independent_86_4": "Independent_86_4", "Independent_86_5": "Independent_86_5", "Independent_87_1": "Independent_87_1", "Independent_87_2": "Independent_87_2", "Independent_87_3": "Independent_87_3", "Independent_87_4": "Independent_87_4", "Independent_87_5": "Independent_87_5", "Independent_87_6": "Independent_87_6", "Independent_87_7": "Independent_87_7", "Independent_87_8": "Independent_87_8", "Independent_87_9": "Independent_87_9", "Independent_88_1": "Independent_88_1", "Independent_88_2": "Independent_88_2", "Independent_88_3": "Independent_88_3", "Independent_88_4": "Independent_88_4", "Independent_88_5": "Independent_88_5", "Independent_88_6": "Independent_88_6", "Independent_88_7": "Independent_88_7", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_89_2": "Independent_89_2", "Independent_89_3": "Independent_89_3", "Independent_89_4": "Independent_89_4", "Independent_89_5": "Independent_89_5", "Independent_89_6": "Independent_89_6", "Independent_89_7": "Independent_89_7", "Independent_89_8": "Independent_89_8", "Independent_89_9": "Independent_89_9", "UCPI": "UCPI", "Independent_90_1": "Independent_90_1", "Independent_90_2": "Independent_90_2", "Independent_90_3": "Independent_90_3", "Independent_90_4": "Independent_90_4", "Independent_90_5": "Independent_90_5", "Independent_90_6": "Independent_90_6", "Independent_90_7": "Independent_90_7", "Independent_91_1": "Independent_91_1", "Independent_91_2": "Independent_91_2", "Independent_91_3": "Independent_91_3", "Independent_91_4": "Independent_91_4", "Independent_91_5": "Independent_91_5", "Independent_91_6": "Independent_91_6", "Independent_91_7": "Independent_91_7", "Independent_91_8": "Independent_91_8", "Independent_92_1": "Independent_92_1", "Independent_92_2": "Independent_92_2", "Independent_92_3": "Independent_92_3", "Independent_93_1": "Independent_93_1", "Independent_93_2": "Independent_93_2", "Independent_93_3": "Independent_93_3", "KNMK": "KNMK", "Independent_94_1": "Independent_94_1", "Independent_94_2": "Independent_94_2", "Independent_94_3": "Independent_94_3", "Independent_94_4": "Independent_94_4", "Independent_94_5": "Independent_94_5", "Independent_94_6": "Independent_94_6", "Independent_94_7": "Independent_94_7", "Independent_94_8": "Independent_94_8", "Independent_94_9": "Independent_94_9", "Independent_94_10": "Independent_94_10", "Independent_94_11": "Independent_94_11", "Independent_95_1": "Independent_95_1", "Independent_95_2": "Independent_95_2", "Independent_95_3": "Independent_95_3", "Independent_95_4": "Independent_95_4", "Independent_95_5": "Independent_95_5", "Independent_95_6": "Independent_95_6", "Independent_95_7": "Independent_95_7", "Independent_95_8": "Independent_95_8", "Independent_95_9": "Independent_95_9", "Independent_95_10": "Independent_95_10", "Independent_96_1": "Independent_96_1", "Independent_96_2": "Independent_96_2", "Independent_96_3": "Independent_96_3", "Independent_96_4": "Independent_96_4", "Independent_96_5": "Independent_96_5", "Independent_96_6": "Independent_96_6", "Independent_96_7": "Independent_96_7", "Independent_96_8": "Independent_96_8", "Independent_97_1": "Independent_97_1", "Independent_97_2": "Independent_97_2", "Independent_97_3": "Independent_97_3", "Independent_97_4": "Independent_97_4", "Independent_97_5": "Independent_97_5", "Independent_97_6": "Independent_97_6", "Independent_98_1": "Independent_98_1", "Independent_98_2": "Independent_98_2", "Independent_98_3": "Independent_98_3", "Independent_98_4": "Independent_98_4", "Independent_98_5": "Independent_98_5", "Independent_98_6": "Independent_98_6", "Independent_98_7": "Independent_98_7", "Independent_99_1": "Independent_99_1", "Independent_99_2": "Independent_99_2", "Independent_99_3": "Independent_99_3", "Independent_99_4": "Independent_99_4", "Independent_99_5": "Independent_99_5", "Independent_99_6": "Independent_99_6", "Independent_99_7": "Independent_99_7", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_100_2": "Independent_100_2", "Independent_100_3": "Independent_100_3", "Independent_100_4": "Independent_100_4", "Independent_100_5": "Independent_100_5", "Independent_100_6": "Independent_100_6", "Independent_100_7": "Independent_100_7", "Independent_100_8": "Independent_100_8", "Independent_100_9": "Independent_100_9", "Independent_100_10": "Independent_100_10", "Independent_101_1": "Independent_101_1", "Independent_101_2": "Independent_101_2", "Independent_101_3": "Independent_101_3", "Independent_102_1": "Independent_102_1", "Independent_102_2": "Independent_102_2", "Independent_102_3": "Independent_102_3", "Independent_102_4": "Independent_102_4", "Independent_102_5": "Independent_102_5", "Independent_102_6": "Independent_102_6", "Independent_102_7": "Independent_102_7", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_103_2": "Independent_103_2", "Independent_103_3": "Independent_103_3", "Independent_103_4": "Independent_103_4", "Independent_103_5": "Independent_103_5", "Independent_103_6": "Independent_103_6", "Independent_103_7": "Independent_103_7", "Independent_103_8": "Independent_103_8", "Independent_104_1": "Independent_104_1", "Independent_104_2": "Independent_104_2", "Independent_104_3": "Independent_104_3", "Independent_104_4": "Independent_104_4", "Independent_104_5": "Independent_104_5", "Independent_104_6": "Independent_104_6", "Independent_104_7": "Independent_104_7", "Independent_104_8": "Independent_104_8", "Independent_104_9": "Independent_104_9", "Independent_105_1": "Independent_105_1", "Independent_105_2": "Independent_105_2", "Independent_105_3": "Independent_105_3", "Independent_105_4": "Independent_105_4", "Independent_105_5": "Independent_105_5", "Independent_105_6": "Independent_105_6", "Independent_105_7": "Independent_105_7", "Independent_105_8": "Independent_105_8", "Independent_106_1": "Independent_106_1", "Independent_106_2": "Independent_106_2", "Independent_106_3": "Independent_106_3", "Independent_106_4": "Independent_106_4", "Independent_106_5": "Independent_106_5", "Independent_106_6": "Independent_106_6", "Independent_106_7": "Independent_106_7", "Independent_106_8": "Independent_106_8", "Independent_106_9": "Independent_106_9", "Independent_107_1": "Independent_107_1", "Independent_107_2": "Independent_107_2", "Independent_107_3": "Independent_107_3", "Independent_107_4": "Independent_107_4", "Independent_107_5": "Independent_107_5", "Independent_107_6": "Independent_107_6", "Independent_107_7": "Independent_107_7", "Independent_108_1": "Independent_108_1", "Independent_108_2": "Independent_108_2", "Independent_108_3": "Independent_108_3", "Independent_108_4": "Independent_108_4", "Independent_108_5": "Independent_108_5", "Independent_108_6": "Independent_108_6", "Independent_108_7": "Independent_108_7", "Independent_109_1": "Independent_109_1", "Independent_109_2": "Independent_109_2", "Independent_110_1": "Independent_110_1", "Independent_110_2": "Independent_110_2", "Independent_110_3": "Independent_110_3", "Independent_110_4": "Independent_110_4", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "Independent_111_2": "Independent_111_2", "Independent_112_1": "Independent_112_1", "Independent_112_2": "Independent_112_2", "Independent_113_1": "Independent_113_1", "Independent_113_2": "Independent_113_2", "Independent_113_3": "Independent_113_3", "Independent_113_4": "Independent_113_4", "Independent_113_5": "Independent_113_5", "Independent_114_1": "Independent_114_1", "Independent_114_2": "Independent_114_2", "Independent_114_3": "Independent_114_3", "Independent_114_4": "Independent_114_4", "Independent_114_5": "Independent_114_5", "Independent_114_6": "Independent_114_6", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_115_2": "Independent_115_2", "Independent_115_3": "Independent_115_3", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "Independent_116_2": "Independent_116_2", "Independent_116_3": "Independent_116_3", "Independent_116_4": "Independent_116_4", "Independent_116_5": "Independent_116_5", "Independent_116_6": "Independent_116_6", "Independent_116_7": "Independent_116_7", "Independent_117_1": "Independent_117_1", "Independent_117_2": "Independent_117_2", "Independent_117_3": "Independent_117_3", "Independent_118_1": "Independent_118_1", "Independent_119_1": "Independent_119_1", "Independent_119_2": "Independent_119_2", "Independent_119_3": "Independent_119_3", "ATMK": "ATMK", "Independent_120_1": "Independent_120_1", "Independent_120_2": "Independent_120_2", "Independent_120_3": "Independent_120_3", "Independent_120_4": "Independent_120_4", "Independent_120_5": "Independent_120_5", "Independent_120_6": "Independent_120_6", "Independent_120_7": "Independent_120_7", "Independent_121_1": "Independent_121_1", "Independent_121_2": "Independent_121_2", "Independent_121_3": "Independent_121_3", "Independent_121_4": "Independent_121_4", "Independent_121_5": "Independent_121_5", "Independent_122_1": "Independent_122_1", "Independent_122_2": "Independent_122_2", "Independent_122_3": "Independent_122_3", "Independent_123_1": "Independent_123_1", "Independent_123_2": "Independent_123_2", "Independent_124_1": "Independent_124_1", "Independent_124_2": "Independent_124_2", "Independent_125_1": "Independent_125_1", "Independent_125_2": "Independent_125_2", "Independent_125_3": "Independent_125_3", "Independent_126_1": "Independent_126_1", "Independent_126_2": "Independent_126_2", "Independent_126_3": "Independent_126_3", "Independent_126_4": "Independent_126_4", "Independent_126_5": "Independent_126_5", "Independent_126_6": "Independent_126_6", "Independent_126_7": "Independent_126_7", "Independent_127_1": "Independent_127_1", "Independent_127_2": "Independent_127_2", "Independent_127_3": "Independent_127_3", "Independent_127_4": "Independent_127_4", "Independent_127_5": "Independent_127_5", "Independent_127_6": "Independent_127_6", "Independent_127_7": "Independent_127_7", "Independent_127_8": "Independent_127_8", "Independent_127_9": "Independent_127_9", "Independent_127_10": "Independent_127_10", "Independent_128_1": "Independent_128_1", "Independent_128_2": "Independent_128_2", "Independent_128_3": "Independent_128_3", "Independent_128_4": "Independent_128_4", "Independent_128_5": "Independent_128_5", "Independent_128_6": "Independent_128_6", "Independent_128_7": "Independent_128_7", "Independent_128_8": "Independent_128_8", "Independent_128_9": "Independent_128_9", "Independent_129_1": "Independent_129_1", "Independent_129_2": "Independent_129_2", "Independent_129_3": "Independent_129_3", "Independent_129_4": "Independent_129_4", "Independent_129_5": "Independent_129_5", "Independent_129_6": "Independent_129_6", "Independent_129_7": "Independent_129_7", "Independent_129_8": "Independent_129_8", "PT": "PT", "TMMK": "TMMK", "Independent_130_1": "Independent_130_1", "Independent_131_1": "Independent_131_1", "Independent_131_2": "Independent_131_2", "Independent_131_3": "Independent_131_3", "Independent_131_4": "Independent_131_4", "Independent_131_5": "Independent_131_5", "Independent_131_6": "Independent_131_6", "Independent_131_7": "Independent_131_7", "Independent_131_8": "Independent_131_8", "Independent_131_9": "Independent_131_9", "Independent_131_10": "Independent_131_10", "Independent_131_11": "Independent_131_11", "Independent_131_12": "Independent_131_12", "Independent_131_13": "Independent_131_13", "Independent_131_14": "Independent_131_14", "Independent_131_15": "Independent_131_15", "Independent_131_16": "Independent_131_16", "ABHM": "ABHM", "RSP": "RSP", "Independent_132_1": "Independent_132_1", "Independent_132_2": "Independent_132_2", "Independent_132_3": "Independent_132_3", "Independent_132_4": "Independent_132_4", "Independent_132_5": "Independent_132_5", "Independent_132_6": "Independent_132_6", "Independent_133_1": "Independent_133_1", "Independent_133_2": "Independent_133_2", "Independent_133_3": "Independent_133_3", "Independent_133_4": "Independent_133_4", "Independent_133_5": "Independent_133_5", "Independent_133_6": "Independent_133_6", "Independent_133_7": "Independent_133_7", "Independent_133_8": "Independent_133_8", "Independent_134_1": "Independent_134_1", "Independent_134_2": "Independent_134_2", "Independent_134_3": "Independent_134_3", "Independent_134_4": "Independent_134_4", "Independent_134_5": "Independent_134_5", "Independent_134_6": "Independent_134_6", "Independent_134_7": "Independent_134_7", "Independent_134_8": "Independent_134_8", "Independent_134_9": "Independent_134_9", "Independent_134_10": "Independent_134_10", "Independent_134_11": "Independent_134_11", "Independent_134_12": "Independent_134_12", "Independent_135_1": "Independent_135_1", "Independent_135_2": "Independent_135_2", "Independent_135_3": "Independent_135_3", "Independent_135_4": "Independent_135_4", "Independent_135_5": "Independent_135_5", "Independent_135_6": "Independent_135_6", "Independent_135_7": "Independent_135_7", "Independent_135_8": "Independent_135_8", "Independent_135_9": "Independent_135_9", "Independent_135_10": "Independent_135_10", "Independent_135_11": "Independent_135_11", "Independent_135_12": "Independent_135_12", "Independent_135_13": "Independent_135_13", "Independent_135_14": "Independent_135_14", "Independent_136_1": "Independent_136_1", "Independent_136_2": "Independent_136_2", "Independent_136_3": "Independent_136_3", "Independent_136_4": "Independent_136_4", "Independent_136_5": "Independent_136_5", "Independent_136_6": "Independent_136_6", "Independent_137_1": "Independent_137_1", "Independent_137_2": "Independent_137_2", "Independent_138_1": "Independent_138_1", "Independent_138_2": "Independent_138_2", "Independent_138_3": "Independent_138_3", "Independent_138_4": "Independent_138_4", "Independent_138_5": "Independent_138_5", "Independent_138_6": "Independent_138_6", "Independent_138_7": "Independent_138_7", "Independent_138_8": "Independent_138_8", "Independent_139_1": "Independent_139_1", "Independent_139_2": "Independent_139_2", "Independent_139_3": "Independent_139_3", "Independent_139_4": "Independent_139_4", "Independent_139_5": "Independent_139_5", "Independent_139_6": "Independent_139_6", "Independent_139_7": "Independent_139_7", "Independent_139_8": "Independent_139_8", "Independent_139_9": "Independent_139_9", "Independent_139_10": "Independent_139_10", "Independent_139_11": "Independent_139_11", "Independent_139_12": "Independent_139_12", "Independent_139_13": "Independent_139_13", "Independent_139_14": "Independent_139_14", "Independent_139_15": "Independent_139_15", "Independent_139_16": "Independent_139_16", "Independent_139_17": "Independent_139_17", "AIDMK": "AIDMK", "UUK": "UUK", "Independent_140_1": "Independent_140_1", "Independent_140_2": "Independent_140_2", "Independent_140_3": "Independent_140_3", "Independent_140_4": "Independent_140_4", "Independent_140_5": "Independent_140_5", "Independent_140_6": "Independent_140_6", "Independent_140_7": "Independent_140_7", "Independent_140_8": "Independent_140_8", "Independent_140_9": "Independent_140_9", "Independent_140_10": "Independent_140_10", "Independent_140_11": "Independent_140_11", "Independent_141_1": "Independent_141_1", "Independent_141_2": "Independent_141_2", "Independent_141_3": "Independent_141_3", "Independent_141_4": "Independent_141_4", "Independent_141_5": "Independent_141_5", "Independent_141_6": "Independent_141_6", "Independent_141_7": "Independent_141_7", "Independent_141_8": "Independent_141_8", "Independent_142_1": "Independent_142_1", "Independent_142_2": "Independent_142_2", "Independent_142_3": "Independent_142_3", "Independent_142_4": "Independent_142_4", "Independent_142_5": "Independent_142_5", "Independent_142_6": "Independent_142_6", "Independent_143_1": "Independent_143_1", "Independent_143_2": "Independent_143_2", "Independent_143_3": "Independent_143_3", "Independent_143_4": "Independent_143_4", "Independent_143_5": "Independent_143_5", "Independent_143_6": "Independent_143_6", "Independent_143_7": "Independent_143_7", "Independent_144_1": "Independent_144_1", "Independent_144_2": "Independent_144_2", "Independent_144_3": "Independent_144_3", "Independent_144_4": "Independent_144_4", "Independent_144_5": "Independent_144_5", "Independent_144_6": "Independent_144_6", "Independent_145_1": "Independent_145_1", "Independent_145_2": "Independent_145_2", "Independent_145_3": "Independent_145_3", "Independent_145_4": "Independent_145_4", "Independent_145_5": "Independent_145_5", "Independent_145_6": "Independent_145_6", "Independent_145_7": "Independent_145_7", "Independent_145_8": "Independent_145_8", "Independent_146_1": "Independent_146_1", "Independent_146_2": "Independent_146_2", "Independent_146_3": "Independent_146_3", "Independent_146_4": "Independent_146_4", "Independent_146_5": "Independent_146_5", "Independent_147_1": "Independent_147_1", "Independent_147_2": "Independent_147_2", "Independent_147_3": "Independent_147_3", "Independent_147_4": "Independent_147_4", "Independent_148_1": "Independent_148_1", "Independent_148_2": "Independent_148_2", "Independent_148_3": "Independent_148_3", "Independent_148_4": "Independent_148_4", "Independent_149_1": "Independent_149_1", "Independent_149_2": "Independent_149_2", "Independent_149_3": "Independent_149_3", "Independent_150_1": "Independent_150_1", "Independent_150_2": "Independent_150_2", "Independent_150_3": "Independent_150_3", "Independent_150_4": "Independent_150_4", "Independent_151_1": "Independent_151_1", "Independent_151_2": "Independent_151_2", "Independent_151_3": "Independent_151_3", "Independent_151_4": "Independent_151_4", "Independent_151_5": "Independent_151_5", "Independent_152_1": "Independent_152_1", "Independent_152_2": "Independent_152_2", "Independent_152_3": "Independent_152_3", "Independent_152_4": "Independent_152_4", "Independent_153_1": "Independent_153_1", "Independent_153_2": "Independent_153_2", "Independent_154_1": "Independent_154_1", "Independent_154_2": "Independent_154_2", "Independent_154_3": "Independent_154_3", "Independent_154_4": "Independent_154_4", "Independent_154_5": "Independent_154_5", "Independent_155_1": "Independent_155_1", "Independent_155_2": "Independent_155_2", "Independent_156_1": "Independent_156_1", "Independent_157_1": "Independent_157_1", "Independent_157_2": "Independent_157_2", "Independent_157_3": "Independent_157_3", "Independent_157_4": "Independent_157_4", "Independent_157_5": "Independent_157_5", "Independent_157_6": "Independent_157_6", "Independent_158_1": "Independent_158_1", "Independent_158_2": "Independent_158_2", "Independent_158_3": "Independent_158_3", "Independent_158_4": "Independent_158_4", "Independent_159_1": "Independent_159_1", "Independent_159_2": "Independent_159_2", "Independent_159_3": "Independent_159_3", "Independent_160_1": "Independent_160_1", "Independent_160_2": "Independent_160_2", "Independent_160_3": "Independent_160_3", "Independent_160_4": "Independent_160_4", "Independent_160_5": "Independent_160_5", "Independent_160_6": "Independent_160_6", "Independent_161_1": "Independent_161_1", "Independent_161_2": "Independent_161_2", "Independent_161_3": "Independent_161_3", "Independent_161_4": "Independent_161_4", "Independent_161_5": "Independent_161_5", "Independent_161_6": "Independent_161_6", "Independent_161_7": "Independent_161_7", "Independent_161_8": "Independent_161_8", "Independent_161_9": "Independent_161_9", "Independent_161_10": "Independent_161_10", "Independent_162_1": "Independent_162_1", "Independent_164_1": "Independent_164_1", "Independent_164_2": "Independent_164_2", "Independent_164_3": "Independent_164_3", "Independent_165_1": "Independent_165_1", "Independent_165_2": "Independent_165_2", "Independent_165_3": "Independent_165_3", "Independent_165_4": "Independent_165_4", "Independent_165_5": "Independent_165_5", "Independent_165_6": "Independent_165_6", "Independent_165_7": "Independent_165_7", "Independent_165_8": "Independent_165_8", "Independent_165_9": "Independent_165_9", "Independent_166_1": "Independent_166_1", "Independent_166_2": "Independent_166_2", "Independent_166_3": "Independent_166_3", "Independent_166_4": "Independent_166_4", "Independent_167_1": "Independent_167_1", "Independent_167_2": "Independent_167_2", "Independent_167_3": "Independent_167_3", "Independent_167_4": "Independent_167_4", "Independent_167_5": "Independent_167_5", "Independent_167_6": "Independent_167_6", "Independent_167_7": "Independent_167_7", "Independent_167_8": "Independent_167_8", "Independent_168_1": "Independent_168_1", "Independent_168_2": "Independent_168_2", "Independent_168_3": "Independent_168_3", "Independent_168_4": "Independent_168_4", "Independent_168_5": "Independent_168_5", "Independent_168_6": "Independent_168_6", "Independent_169_1": "Independent_169_1", "Independent_169_2": "Independent_169_2", "Independent_169_3": "Independent_169_3", "Independent_169_4": "Independent_169_4", "Independent_170_1": "Independent_170_1", "Independent_170_2": "Independent_170_2", "Independent_170_3": "Independent_170_3", "Independent_170_4": "Independent_170_4", "Independent_170_5": "Independent_170_5", "Independent_171_1": "Independent_171_1", "Independent_171_2": "Independent_171_2", "Independent_171_3": "Independent_171_3", "Independent_171_4": "Independent_171_4", "Independent_172_1": "Independent_172_1", "Independent_172_2": "Independent_172_2", "Independent_172_3": "Independent_172_3", "Independent_172_4": "Independent_172_4", "Independent_172_5": "Independent_172_5", "Independent_172_6": "Independent_172_6", "LCOP": "LCOP", "Independent_174_1": "Independent_174_1", "Independent_174_2": "Independent_174_2", "Independent_174_3": "Independent_174_3", "Independent_175_1": "Independent_175_1", "Independent_175_2": "Independent_175_2", "Independent_176_1": "Independent_176_1", "Independent_176_2": "Independent_176_2", "Independent_176_3": "Independent_176_3", "Independent_176_4": "Independent_176_4", "Independent_177_1": "Independent_177_1", "Independent_177_2": "Independent_177_2", "Independent_177_3": "Independent_177_3", "Independent_177_4": "Independent_177_4", "Independent_177_5": "Independent_177_5", "Independent_178_1": "Independent_178_1", "Independent_178_2": "Independent_178_2", "Independent_178_3": "Independent_178_3", "Independent_179_1": "Independent_179_1", "Independent_179_2": "Independent_179_2", "Independent_179_3": "Independent_179_3", "Independent_179_4": "Independent_179_4", "Independent_179_5": "Independent_179_5", "Independent_180_1": "Independent_180_1", "Independent_180_2": "Independent_180_2", "Independent_180_3": "Independent_180_3", "Independent_180_4": "Independent_180_4", "Independent_180_5": "Independent_180_5", "Independent_181_1": "Independent_181_1", "Independent_181_2": "Independent_181_2", "Independent_181_3": "Independent_181_3", "Independent_181_4": "Independent_181_4", "Independent_181_5": "Independent_181_5", "Independent_181_6": "Independent_181_6", "Independent_182_1": "Independent_182_1", "Independent_182_2": "Independent_182_2", "Independent_183_1": "Independent_183_1", "Independent_183_2": "Independent_183_2", "Independent_183_3": "Independent_183_3", "Independent_183_4": "Independent_183_4", "Independent_184_1": "Independent_184_1", "Independent_184_2": "Independent_184_2", "Independent_184_3": "Independent_184_3", "Independent_184_4": "Independent_184_4", "Independent_185_1": "Independent_185_1", "Independent_185_2": "Independent_185_2", "Independent_185_3": "Independent_185_3", "Independent_185_4": "Independent_185_4", "Independent_185_5": "Independent_185_5", "Independent_185_6": "Independent_185_6", "Independent_185_7": "Independent_185_7", "Independent_186_1": "Independent_186_1", "Independent_186_2": "Independent_186_2", "Independent_187_1": "Independent_187_1", "Independent_187_2": "Independent_187_2", "Independent_187_3": "Independent_187_3", "Independent_187_4": "Independent_187_4", "Independent_187_5": "Independent_187_5", "Independent_188_1": "Independent_188_1", "Independent_188_2": "Independent_188_2", "Independent_188_3": "Independent_188_3", "Independent_188_4": "Independent_188_4", "Independent_188_5": "Independent_188_5", "Independent_188_6": "Independent_188_6", "Independent_189_1": "Independent_189_1", "Independent_189_2": "Independent_189_2", "Independent_189_3": "Independent_189_3", "Independent_189_4": "Independent_189_4", "Independent_189_5": "Independent_189_5", "Independent_189_6": "Independent_189_6", "Independent_190_1": "Independent_190_1", "Independent_190_2": "Independent_190_2", "Independent_190_3": "Independent_190_3", "Independent_190_4": "Independent_190_4", "Independent_190_5": "Independent_190_5", "Independent_190_6": "Independent_190_6", "Independent_190_7": "Independent_190_7", "Independent_190_8": "Independent_190_8", "Independent_190_9": "Independent_190_9", "Independent_191_1": "Independent_191_1", "Independent_191_2": "Independent_191_2", "Independent_191_3": "Independent_191_3", "Independent_191_4": "Independent_191_4", "Independent_191_5": "Independent_191_5", "Independent_191_6": "Independent_191_6", "Independent_192_1": "Independent_192_1", "Independent_192_2": "Independent_192_2", "Independent_193_1": "Independent_193_1", "Independent_193_2": "Independent_193_2", "Independent_193_3": "Independent_193_3", "Independent_193_4": "Independent_193_4", "Independent_193_5": "Independent_193_5", "Independent_193_6": "Independent_193_6", "Independent_193_7": "Independent_193_7", "Independent_193_8": "Independent_193_8", "Independent_194_1": "Independent_194_1", "Independent_194_2": "Independent_194_2", "Independent_194_3": "Independent_194_3", "Independent_194_4": "Independent_194_4", "Independent_194_5": "Independent_194_5", "Independent_195_1": "Independent_195_1", "Independent_195_2": "Independent_195_2", "Independent_195_3": "Independent_195_3", "Independent_195_4": "Independent_195_4", "Independent_195_5": "Independent_195_5", "Independent_195_6": "Independent_195_6", "Independent_195_7": "Independent_195_7", "Independent_195_8": "Independent_195_8", "Independent_196_1": "Independent_196_1", "Independent_196_2": "Independent_196_2", "Independent_196_3": "Independent_196_3", "Independent_196_4": "Independent_196_4", "Independent_196_5": "Independent_196_5", "Independent_196_6": "Independent_196_6", "Independent_196_7": "Independent_196_7", "Independent_196_8": "Independent_196_8", "Independent_196_9": "Independent_196_9", "AIFB": "AIFB", "Independent_197_1": "Independent_197_1", "Independent_197_2": "Independent_197_2", "Independent_197_3": "Independent_197_3", "Independent_197_4": "Independent_197_4", "Independent_197_5": "Independent_197_5", "Independent_198_1": "Independent_198_1", "Independent_198_2": "Independent_198_2", "Independent_198_3": "Independent_198_3", "Independent_198_4": "Independent_198_4", "Independent_198_5": "Independent_198_5", "Independent_198_6": "Independent_198_6", "Independent_198_7": "Independent_198_7", "Independent_198_8": "Independent_198_8", "Independent_198_9": "Independent_198_9", "Independent_198_10": "Independent_198_10", "Independent_198_11": "Independent_198_11", "Independent_198_12": "Independent_198_12", "Independent_198_13": "Independent_198_13", "Independent_198_14": "Independent_198_14", "Independent_198_15": "Independent_198_15", "Independent_198_16": "Independent_198_16", "Independent_199_1": "Independent_199_1", "Independent_199_2": "Independent_199_2", "Independent_199_3": "Independent_199_3", "Independent_199_4": "Independent_199_4", "Independent_199_5": "Independent_199_5", "Independent_199_6": "Independent_199_6", "Independent_199_7": "Independent_199_7", "Independent_199_8": "Independent_199_8", "Independent_200_1": "Independent_200_1", "Independent_200_2": "Independent_200_2", "Independent_200_3": "Independent_200_3", "Independent_200_4": "Independent_200_4", "Independent_200_5": "Independent_200_5", "Independent_200_6": "Independent_200_6", "Independent_200_7": "Independent_200_7", "Independent_200_8": "Independent_200_8", "Independent_200_9": "Independent_200_9", "Independent_200_10": "Independent_200_10", "Independent_200_11": "Independent_200_11", "Independent_200_12": "Independent_200_12", "Independent_200_13": "Independent_200_13", "Independent_200_14": "Independent_200_14", "Independent_200_15": "Independent_200_15", "Independent_200_16": "Independent_200_16", "Independent_200_17": "Independent_200_17", "Independent_200_18": "Independent_200_18", "Independent_201_1": "Independent_201_1", "Independent_201_2": "Independent_201_2", "Independent_201_3": "Independent_201_3", "Independent_201_4": "Independent_201_4", "Independent_201_5": "Independent_201_5", "Independent_201_6": "Independent_201_6", "Independent_202_1": "Independent_202_1", "Independent_202_2": "Independent_202_2", "Independent_202_3": "Independent_202_3", "Independent_202_4": "Independent_202_4", "Independent_202_5": "Independent_202_5", "Independent_202_6": "Independent_202_6", "Independent_202_7": "Independent_202_7", "Independent_202_8": "Independent_202_8", "Independent_202_9": "Independent_202_9", "Independent_202_10": "Independent_202_10", "Independent_202_11": "Independent_202_11", "Independent_203_1": "Independent_203_1", "Independent_203_2": "Independent_203_2", "Independent_203_3": "Independent_203_3", "Independent_203_4": "Independent_203_4", "Independent_203_5": "Independent_203_5", "Independent_203_6": "Independent_203_6", "Independent_203_7": "Independent_203_7", "Independent_204_1": "Independent_204_1", "Independent_204_2": "Independent_204_2", "Independent_204_3": "Independent_204_3", "Independent_204_4": "Independent_204_4", "Independent_204_5": "Independent_204_5", "Independent_204_6": "Independent_204_6", "Independent_204_7": "Independent_204_7", "Independent_204_8": "Independent_204_8", "Independent_205_1": "Independent_205_1", "Independent_205_2": "Independent_205_2", "Independent_205_3": "Independent_205_3", "Independent_205_4": "Independent_205_4", "Independent_205_5": "Independent_205_5", "Independent_205_6": "Independent_205_6", "Independent_205_7": "Independent_205_7", "Independent_205_8": "Independent_205_8", "Independent_205_9": "Independent_205_9", "Independent_205_10": "Independent_205_10", "Independent_205_11": "Independent_205_11", "Independent_205_12": "Independent_205_12", "Independent_206_1": "Independent_206_1", "Independent_206_2": "Independent_206_2", "Independent_206_3": "Independent_206_3", "Independent_206_4": "Independent_206_4", "Independent_206_5": "Independent_206_5", "Independent_206_6": "Independent_206_6", "Independent_206_7": "Independent_206_7", "Independent_206_8": "Independent_206_8", "Independent_206_9": "Independent_206_9", "Independent_206_10": "Independent_206_10", "Independent_207_1": "Independent_207_1", "Independent_207_2": "Independent_207_2", "Independent_207_3": "Independent_207_3", "Independent_207_4": "Independent_207_4", "Independent_207_5": "Independent_207_5", "Independent_207_6": "Independent_207_6", "Independent_207_7": "Independent_207_7", "Independent_207_8": "Independent_207_8", "Independent_207_9": "Independent_207_9", "Independent_207_10": "Independent_207_10", "Independent_207_11": "Independent_207_11", "Independent_208_1": "Independent_208_1", "Independent_208_2": "Independent_208_2", "Independent_208_3": "Independent_208_3", "Independent_208_4": "Independent_208_4", "Independent_208_5": "Independent_208_5", "Independent_208_6": "Independent_208_6", "Independent_208_7": "Independent_208_7", "Independent_208_8": "Independent_208_8", "Independent_209_1": "Independent_209_1", "Independent_209_2": "Independent_209_2", "Independent_209_3": "Independent_209_3", "Independent_209_4": "Independent_209_4", "Independent_209_5": "Independent_209_5", "Independent_209_6": "Independent_209_6", "IDP": "IDP", "Independent_210_1": "Independent_210_1", "Independent_210_2": "Independent_210_2", "Independent_210_3": "Independent_210_3", "Independent_210_4": "Independent_210_4", "Independent_210_5": "Independent_210_5", "Independent_210_6": "Independent_210_6", "Independent_210_7": "Independent_210_7", "Independent_210_8": "Independent_210_8", "Independent_210_9": "Independent_210_9", "Independent_210_10": "Independent_210_10", "Independent_211_1": "Independent_211_1", "Independent_211_2": "Independent_211_2", "Independent_211_3": "Independent_211_3", "Independent_211_4": "Independent_211_4", "Independent_211_5": "Independent_211_5", "Independent_211_6": "Independent_211_6", "Independent_211_7": "Independent_211_7", "Independent_211_8": "Independent_211_8", "Independent_211_9": "Independent_211_9", "Independent_211_10": "Independent_211_10", "Independent_211_11": "Independent_211_11", "Independent_212_1": "Independent_212_1", "Independent_212_2": "Independent_212_2", "Independent_212_3": "Independent_212_3", "Independent_213_1": "Independent_213_1", "Independent_213_2": "Independent_213_2", "Independent_213_3": "Independent_213_3", "Independent_213_4": "Independent_213_4", "Independent_213_5": "Independent_213_5", "Independent_213_6": "Independent_213_6", "Independent_213_7": "Independent_213_7", "Independent_214_1": "Independent_214_1", "Independent_214_2": "Independent_214_2", "Independent_214_3": "Independent_214_3", "Independent_214_4": "Independent_214_4", "Independent_214_5": "Independent_214_5", "Independent_214_6": "Independent_214_6", "Independent_214_7": "Independent_214_7", "Independent_214_8": "Independent_214_8", "Independent_215_1": "Independent_215_1", "Independent_215_2": "Independent_215_2", "Independent_215_3": "Independent_215_3", "Independent_215_4": "Independent_215_4", "Independent_215_5": "Independent_215_5", "Independent_215_6": "Independent_215_6", "Independent_215_7": "Independent_215_7", "Independent_215_8": "Independent_215_8", "Independent_215_9": "Independent_215_9", "Independent_215_10": "Independent_215_10", "AIMF": "AIMF", "Independent_216_1": "Independent_216_1", "Independent_217_1": "Independent_217_1", "Independent_217_2": "Independent_217_2", "Independent_217_3": "Independent_217_3", "Independent_217_4": "Independent_217_4", "Independent_217_5": "Independent_217_5", "Independent_217_6": "Independent_217_6", "Independent_218_1": "Independent_218_1", "Independent_218_2": "Independent_218_2", "Independent_218_3": "Independent_218_3", "Independent_218_4": "Independent_218_4", "Independent_218_5": "Independent_218_5", "Independent_218_6": "Independent_218_6", "Independent_218_7": "Independent_218_7", "Independent_218_8": "Independent_218_8", "Independent_218_9": "Independent_218_9", "Independent_218_10": "Independent_218_10", "Independent_219_1": "Independent_219_1", "Independent_219_2": "Independent_219_2", "Independent_219_3": "Independent_219_3", "Independent_219_4": "Independent_219_4", "Independent_219_5": "Independent_219_5", "Independent_219_6": "Independent_219_6", "Independent_219_7": "Independent_219_7", "Independent_219_8": "Independent_219_8", "Independent_219_9": "Independent_219_9", "Independent_219_10": "Independent_219_10", "Independent_220_1": "Independent_220_1", "Independent_220_2": "Independent_220_2", "Independent_220_3": "Independent_220_3", "Independent_220_4": "Independent_220_4", "Independent_221_1": "Independent_221_1", "Independent_221_2": "Independent_221_2", "Independent_221_3": "Independent_221_3", "Independent_221_4": "Independent_221_4", "Independent_221_5": "Independent_221_5", "Independent_221_6": "Independent_221_6", "Independent_221_7": "Independent_221_7", "Independent_221_8": "Independent_221_8", "Independent_221_9": "Independent_221_9", "Independent_221_10": "Independent_221_10", "Independent_221_11": "Independent_221_11", "Independent_222_1": "Independent_222_1", "Independent_222_2": "Independent_222_2", "Independent_222_3": "Independent_222_3", "Independent_222_4": "Independent_222_4", "Independent_223_1": "Independent_223_1", "Independent_223_2": "Independent_223_2", "Independent_223_3": "Independent_223_3", "Independent_223_4": "Independent_223_4", "Independent_223_5": "Independent_223_5", "Independent_223_6": "Independent_223_6", "Independent_223_7": "Independent_223_7", "Independent_223_8": "Independent_223_8", "Independent_224_1": "Independent_224_1", "Independent_224_2": "Independent_224_2", "Independent_224_3": "Independent_224_3", "Independent_224_4": "Independent_224_4", "Independent_224_5": "Independent_224_5", "Independent_224_6": "Independent_224_6", "Independent_224_7": "Independent_224_7", "Independent_224_8": "Independent_224_8", "Independent_224_9": "Independent_224_9", "Independent_224_10": "Independent_224_10", "Independent_225_1": "Independent_225_1", "Independent_225_2": "Independent_225_2", "Independent_225_3": "Independent_225_3", "Independent_225_4": "Independent_225_4", "Independent_225_5": "Independent_225_5", "Independent_225_6": "Independent_225_6", "Independent_225_7": "Independent_225_7", "Independent_225_8": "Independent_225_8", "Independent_226_1": "Independent_226_1", "Independent_226_2": "Independent_226_2", "Independent_226_3": "Independent_226_3", "Independent_226_4": "Independent_226_4", "Independent_226_5": "Independent_226_5", "Independent_226_6": "Independent_226_6", "Independent_226_7": "Independent_226_7", "Independent_226_8": "Independent_226_8", "Independent_227_1": "Independent_227_1", "Independent_227_2": "Independent_227_2", "Independent_228_1": "Independent_228_1", "Independent_228_2": "Independent_228_2", "Independent_228_3": "Independent_228_3", "Independent_228_4": "Independent_228_4", "Independent_228_5": "Independent_228_5", "Independent_228_6": "Independent_228_6", "Independent_228_7": "Independent_228_7", "Independent_228_8": "Independent_228_8", "Independent_228_9": "Independent_228_9", "Independent_229_1": "Independent_229_1", "Independent_229_2": "Independent_229_2", "Independent_229_3": "Independent_229_3", "Independent_229_4": "Independent_229_4", "Independent_229_5": "Independent_229_5", "Independent_229_6": "Independent_229_6", "Independent_229_7": "Independent_229_7", "Independent_229_8": "Independent_229_8", "Independent_229_9": "Independent_229_9", "Independent_229_10": "Independent_229_10", "Independent_229_11": "Independent_229_11", "Independent_230_1": "Independent_230_1", "Independent_230_2": "Independent_230_2", "Independent_230_3": "Independent_230_3", "Independent_230_4": "Independent_230_4", "Independent_230_5": "Independent_230_5", "Independent_230_6": "Independent_230_6", "Independent_230_7": "Independent_230_7", "Independent_231_1": "Independent_231_1", "Independent_231_2": "Independent_231_2", "Independent_232_1": "Independent_232_1", "Independent_232_2": "Independent_232_2", "Independent_232_3": "Independent_232_3", "Independent_232_4": "Independent_232_4", "Independent_232_5": "Independent_232_5", "Independent_232_6": "Independent_232_6", "Independent_232_7": "Independent_232_7", "Independent_232_8": "Independent_232_8", "Independent_233_1": "Independent_233_1", "Independent_233_2": "Independent_233_2", "Independent_233_3": "Independent_233_3", "Independent_233_4": "Independent_233_4", "Independent_234_1": "Independent_234_1", "Independent_234_2": "Independent_234_2", "Independent_234_3": "Independent_234_3", "Independent_234_4": "Independent_234_4", "Independent_234_5": "Independent_234_5", "Independent_234_6": "Independent_234_6"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 234, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 234, "cast_gt_registered": 234}, "n_stations_flagged": 234, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:52:42.072873", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.646, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.666, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.671, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.532, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.444, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.671, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.532, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.532, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.424, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.582, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 234}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1ce9e0b2aed644099390df9f894610be", "name": "India 2013 local (overnight india-madhya-pradesh-2013-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2013, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Madhya_Pradesh/Madhya_Pradesh_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"party_BJP": "party_BJP", "party_BSP": "party_BSP", "party_INC": "party_INC", "party_NOTA": "party_NOTA", "party_NCP": "party_NCP", "party_SDPI": "party_SDPI", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "party_SP": "party_SP", "party_BA_S_D": "party_BA_S_D", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "Independent_1_3": "Independent_1_3", "party_RKSP": "party_RKSP", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "Independent_2_3": "Independent_2_3", "Independent_2_4": "Independent_2_4", "party_SAMSP": "party_SAMSP", "Independent_2_5": "Independent_2_5", "party_MD": "party_MD", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "party_CPM": "party_CPM", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "Independent_4_4": "Independent_4_4", "Independent_4_5": "Independent_4_5", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "Independent_5_2": "Independent_5_2", "Independent_5_3": "Independent_5_3", "Independent_5_4": "Independent_5_4", "Independent_5_5": "Independent_5_5", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "Independent_6_2": "Independent_6_2", "Independent_6_3": "Independent_6_3", "Independent_6_4": "Independent_6_4", "Independent_6_5": "Independent_6_5", "Independent_6_6": "Independent_6_6", "Independent_6_7": "Independent_6_7", "Independent_6_8": "Independent_6_8", "Independent_6_9": "Independent_6_9", "party_RSMD": "party_RSMD", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "Independent_7_2": "Independent_7_2", "Independent_7_3": "Independent_7_3", "Independent_7_4": "Independent_7_4", "Independent_7_5": "Independent_7_5", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "Independent_9_2": "Independent_9_2", "party_GMS": "party_GMS", "Independent_9_3": "Independent_9_3", "Independent_9_4": "Independent_9_4", "Independent_9_5": "Independent_9_5", "Independent_9_6": "Independent_9_6", "Independent_9_7": "Independent_9_7", "Independent_9_8": "Independent_9_8", "Independent_9_9": "Independent_9_9", "Independent_9_10": "Independent_9_10", "Independent_9_11": "Independent_9_11", "party_AASP": "party_AASP", "Independent_9_12": "Independent_9_12", "Independent_9_13": "Independent_9_13", "Independent_9_14": "Independent_9_14", "Independent_9_15": "Independent_9_15", "Independent_9_16": "Independent_9_16", "Independent_9_17": "Independent_9_17", "Independent_9_18": "Independent_9_18", "Independent_9_19": "Independent_9_19", "Independent_9_20": "Independent_9_20", "party_LJP": "party_LJP", "Independent_9_21": "Independent_9_21", "Independent_9_22": "Independent_9_22", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "Independent_10_3": "Independent_10_3", "Independent_10_4": "Independent_10_4", "Independent_10_5": "Independent_10_5", "Independent_10_6": "Independent_10_6", "party_CPI_ML_L": "party_CPI_ML_L", "Independent_10_7": "Independent_10_7", "party_ABGP": "party_ABGP", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "Independent_11_3": "Independent_11_3", "Independent_11_4": "Independent_11_4", "Independent_11_5": "Independent_11_5", "Independent_11_6": "Independent_11_6", "Independent_11_7": "Independent_11_7", "party_NLP": "party_NLP", "Independent_11_8": "Independent_11_8", "Independent_11_9": "Independent_11_9", "Independent_11_10": "Independent_11_10", "Independent_11_11": "Independent_11_11", "Independent_11_12": "Independent_11_12", "Independent_11_13": "Independent_11_13", "Independent_11_14": "Independent_11_14", "Independent_11_15": "Independent_11_15", "Independent_11_16": "Independent_11_16", "Independent_11_17": "Independent_11_17", "Independent_11_18": "Independent_11_18", "Independent_11_19": "Independent_11_19", "Independent_11_20": "Independent_11_20", "party_LSWP": "party_LSWP", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "Independent_12_3": "Independent_12_3", "Independent_12_4": "Independent_12_4", "Independent_12_5": "Independent_12_5", "Independent_12_6": "Independent_12_6", "Independent_12_7": "Independent_12_7", "party_AIFB": "party_AIFB", "Independent_12_8": "Independent_12_8", "party_ASP": "party_ASP", "Independent_12_9": "Independent_12_9", "Independent_12_10": "Independent_12_10", "Independent_12_11": "Independent_12_11", "Independent_12_12": "Independent_12_12", "Independent_12_13": "Independent_12_13", "Independent_12_14": "Independent_12_14", "Independent_12_15": "Independent_12_15", "Independent_12_16": "Independent_12_16", "Independent_12_17": "Independent_12_17", "party_IVD": "party_IVD", "Independent_12_18": "Independent_12_18", "Independent_12_19": "Independent_12_19", "Independent_12_20": "Independent_12_20", "Independent_12_21": "Independent_12_21", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "Independent_13_3": "Independent_13_3", "party_IJP": "party_IJP", "Independent_13_4": "Independent_13_4", "Independent_13_5": "Independent_13_5", "Independent_13_6": "Independent_13_6", "Independent_13_7": "Independent_13_7", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "Independent_14_3": "Independent_14_3", "Independent_14_4": "Independent_14_4", "Independent_14_5": "Independent_14_5", "party_BRMD": "party_BRMD", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_15_2": "Independent_15_2", "Independent_15_3": "Independent_15_3", "Independent_15_4": "Independent_15_4", "party_SUCI": "party_SUCI", "Independent_15_5": "Independent_15_5", "Independent_15_6": "Independent_15_6", "Independent_15_7": "Independent_15_7", "Independent_15_8": "Independent_15_8", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_16_2": "Independent_16_2", "Independent_16_3": "Independent_16_3", "party_RPI_A": "party_RPI_A", "Independent_16_4": "Independent_16_4", "Independent_16_5": "Independent_16_5", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "Independent_17_3": "Independent_17_3", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_18_3": "Independent_18_3", "Independent_18_4": "Independent_18_4", "Independent_18_5": "Independent_18_5", "Independent_18_6": "Independent_18_6", "Independent_18_7": "Independent_18_7", "Independent_18_8": "Independent_18_8", "Independent_18_9": "Independent_18_9", "Independent_18_10": "Independent_18_10", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "Independent_19_3": "Independent_19_3", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_20_2": "Independent_20_2", "Independent_20_3": "Independent_20_3", "Independent_20_4": "Independent_20_4", "Independent_20_5": "Independent_20_5", "Independent_20_6": "Independent_20_6", "Independent_20_7": "Independent_20_7", "Independent_20_8": "Independent_20_8", "Independent_20_9": "Independent_20_9", "Independent_20_10": "Independent_20_10", "Independent_20_11": "Independent_20_11", "party_BSCP": "party_BSCP", "Independent_20_12": "Independent_20_12", "Independent_20_13": "Independent_20_13", "Independent_20_14": "Independent_20_14", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_21_2": "Independent_21_2", "Independent_21_3": "Independent_21_3", "Independent_21_4": "Independent_21_4", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_22_2": "Independent_22_2", "Independent_22_3": "Independent_22_3", "Independent_22_4": "Independent_22_4", "Independent_22_5": "Independent_22_5", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_23_2": "Independent_23_2", "Independent_23_3": "Independent_23_3", "Independent_23_4": "Independent_23_4", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "Independent_24_2": "Independent_24_2", "Independent_24_3": "Independent_24_3", "Independent_24_4": "Independent_24_4", "Independent_24_5": "Independent_24_5", "Independent_24_6": "Independent_24_6", "Independent_24_7": "Independent_24_7", "Independent_24_8": "Independent_24_8", "Independent_24_9": "Independent_24_9", "Independent_24_10": "Independent_24_10", "Independent_24_11": "Independent_24_11", "Independent_24_12": "Independent_24_12", "Independent_24_13": "Independent_24_13", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "Independent_25_4": "Independent_25_4", "Independent_25_5": "Independent_25_5", "Independent_25_6": "Independent_25_6", "Independent_25_7": "Independent_25_7", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "Independent_26_3": "Independent_26_3", "Independent_26_4": "Independent_26_4", "Independent_26_5": "Independent_26_5", "Independent_26_6": "Independent_26_6", "party_NRSN": "party_NRSN", "Independent_26_7": "Independent_26_7", "Independent_26_8": "Independent_26_8", "Independent_26_9": "Independent_26_9", "Independent_26_10": "Independent_26_10", "Independent_26_11": "Independent_26_11", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "Independent_27_3": "Independent_27_3", "party_SHS": "party_SHS", "Independent_27_4": "Independent_27_4", "Independent_27_5": "Independent_27_5", "Independent_27_6": "Independent_27_6", "Independent_27_7": "Independent_27_7", "Independent_27_8": "Independent_27_8", "Independent_27_9": "Independent_27_9", "Independent_27_10": "Independent_27_10", "party_CPI": "party_CPI", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "Independent_28_4": "Independent_28_4", "Independent_28_5": "Independent_28_5", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "Independent_29_4": "Independent_29_4", "Independent_29_5": "Independent_29_5", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_31_2": "Independent_31_2", "Independent_31_3": "Independent_31_3", "Independent_31_4": "Independent_31_4", "Independent_31_5": "Independent_31_5", "Independent_31_6": "Independent_31_6", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_32_3": "Independent_32_3", "Independent_32_4": "Independent_32_4", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "Independent_33_4": "Independent_33_4", "Independent_33_5": "Independent_33_5", "Independent_33_6": "Independent_33_6", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_34_3": "Independent_34_3", "Independent_34_4": "Independent_34_4", "Independent_34_5": "Independent_34_5", "Independent_34_6": "Independent_34_6", "Independent_34_7": "Independent_34_7", "Independent_34_8": "Independent_34_8", "Independent_34_9": "Independent_34_9", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_36_3": "Independent_36_3", "Independent_36_4": "Independent_36_4", "Independent_36_5": "Independent_36_5", "Independent_36_6": "Independent_36_6", "Independent_36_7": "Independent_36_7", "Independent_36_8": "Independent_36_8", "Independent_36_9": "Independent_36_9", "Independent_36_10": "Independent_36_10", "Independent_36_11": "Independent_36_11", "Independent_36_12": "Independent_36_12", "party_JD_U": "party_JD_U", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "Independent_37_3": "Independent_37_3", "Independent_37_4": "Independent_37_4", "Independent_37_5": "Independent_37_5", "party_GGP": "party_GGP", "Independent_37_6": "Independent_37_6", "party_JND": "party_JND", "party_KMPP": "party_KMPP", "party_AD": "party_AD", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_38_3": "Independent_38_3", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_39_2": "Independent_39_2", "Independent_39_3": "Independent_39_3", "Independent_39_4": "Independent_39_4", "Independent_39_5": "Independent_39_5", "Independent_39_6": "Independent_39_6", "Independent_39_7": "Independent_39_7", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "party_MNDP": "party_MNDP", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_42_2": "Independent_42_2", "Independent_42_3": "Independent_42_3", "Independent_42_4": "Independent_42_4", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_43_2": "Independent_43_2", "Independent_43_3": "Independent_43_3", "Independent_43_4": "Independent_43_4", "Independent_43_5": "Independent_43_5", "Independent_43_6": "Independent_43_6", "Independent_43_7": "Independent_43_7", "Independent_43_8": "Independent_43_8", "Independent_43_9": "Independent_43_9", "Independent_43_10": "Independent_43_10", "Independent_43_11": "Independent_43_11", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "Independent_44_3": "Independent_44_3", "Independent_44_4": "Independent_44_4", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_45_2": "Independent_45_2", "Independent_45_3": "Independent_45_3", "Independent_45_4": "Independent_45_4", "Independent_45_5": "Independent_45_5", "Independent_45_6": "Independent_45_6", "Independent_45_7": "Independent_45_7", "party_MNNS": "party_MNNS", "Independent_45_8": "Independent_45_8", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "party_BC": "party_BC", "Independent_46_3": "Independent_46_3", "Independent_46_4": "Independent_46_4", "Independent_46_5": "Independent_46_5", "Independent_46_6": "Independent_46_6", "Independent_46_7": "Independent_46_7", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "Independent_47_3": "Independent_47_3", "Independent_47_4": "Independent_47_4", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_48_2": "Independent_48_2", "Independent_48_3": "Independent_48_3", "Independent_48_4": "Independent_48_4", "Independent_48_5": "Independent_48_5", "Independent_48_6": "Independent_48_6", "Independent_48_7": "Independent_48_7", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_50_3": "Independent_50_3", "Independent_50_4": "Independent_50_4", "Independent_50_5": "Independent_50_5", "Independent_50_6": "Independent_50_6", "Independent_50_7": "Independent_50_7", "Independent_50_8": "Independent_50_8", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_51_3": "Independent_51_3", "Independent_51_4": "Independent_51_4", "Independent_51_5": "Independent_51_5", "Independent_51_6": "Independent_51_6", "Independent_51_7": "Independent_51_7", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "Independent_52_3": "Independent_52_3", "Independent_52_4": "Independent_52_4", "Independent_52_5": "Independent_52_5", "Independent_52_6": "Independent_52_6", "Independent_52_7": "Independent_52_7", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "Independent_53_2": "Independent_53_2", "Independent_53_3": "Independent_53_3", "Independent_53_4": "Independent_53_4", "Independent_53_5": "Independent_53_5", "Independent_53_6": "Independent_53_6", "Independent_53_7": "Independent_53_7", "Independent_53_8": "Independent_53_8", "Independent_53_9": "Independent_53_9", "Independent_53_10": "Independent_53_10", "Independent_53_11": "Independent_53_11", "Independent_53_12": "Independent_53_12", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_54_3": "Independent_54_3", "Independent_54_4": "Independent_54_4", "Independent_54_5": "Independent_54_5", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_55_2": "Independent_55_2", "Independent_55_3": "Independent_55_3", "Independent_55_4": "Independent_55_4", "Independent_55_5": "Independent_55_5", "Independent_55_6": "Independent_55_6", "Independent_55_7": "Independent_55_7", "party_SVSP": "party_SVSP", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_56_2": "Independent_56_2", "Independent_56_3": "Independent_56_3", "party_RPI_KH": "party_RPI_KH", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_57_2": "Independent_57_2", "Independent_57_3": "Independent_57_3", "Independent_58_1": "Independent_58_1", "Independent_58_2": "Independent_58_2", "Independent_58_3": "Independent_58_3", "Independent_58_4": "Independent_58_4", "Independent_58_5": "Independent_58_5", "Independent_58_6": "Independent_58_6", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_59_2": "Independent_59_2", "Independent_59_3": "Independent_59_3", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "Independent_60_3": "Independent_60_3", "Independent_60_4": "Independent_60_4", "Independent_60_5": "Independent_60_5", "Independent_60_6": "Independent_60_6", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "party_RPD": "party_RPD", "party_SAP": "party_SAP", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "Independent_61_3": "Independent_61_3", "Independent_61_4": "Independent_61_4", "party_RBCP": "party_RBCP", "party_RSAD": "party_RSAD", "Independent_61_5": "Independent_61_5", "party_JD_S": "party_JD_S", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_62_3": "Independent_62_3", "Independent_62_4": "Independent_62_4", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "party_ABHM": "party_ABHM", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "Independent_63_3": "Independent_63_3", "Independent_63_4": "Independent_63_4", "Independent_63_5": "Independent_63_5", "Independent_63_6": "Independent_63_6", "Independent_63_7": "Independent_63_7", "Independent_63_8": "Independent_63_8", "party_NPEP": "party_NPEP", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_64_2": "Independent_64_2", "Independent_64_3": "Independent_64_3", "Independent_64_4": "Independent_64_4", "Independent_64_5": "Independent_64_5", "Independent_64_6": "Independent_64_6", "Independent_64_7": "Independent_64_7", "Independent_64_8": "Independent_64_8", "Independent_64_9": "Independent_64_9", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_65_2": "Independent_65_2", "Independent_65_3": "Independent_65_3", "Independent_65_4": "Independent_65_4", "Independent_65_5": "Independent_65_5", "Independent_65_6": "Independent_65_6", "party_HJP": "party_HJP", "Independent_65_7": "Independent_65_7", "Independent_65_8": "Independent_65_8", "Independent_65_9": "Independent_65_9", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_66_2": "Independent_66_2", "Independent_67_1": "Independent_67_1", "Independent_67_2": "Independent_67_2", "Independent_67_3": "Independent_67_3", "Independent_67_4": "Independent_67_4", "Independent_67_5": "Independent_67_5", "Independent_67_6": "Independent_67_6", "Independent_67_7": "Independent_67_7", "Independent_67_8": "Independent_67_8", "Independent_67_9": "Independent_67_9", "Independent_67_10": "Independent_67_10", "Independent_67_11": "Independent_67_11", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "Independent_68_3": "Independent_68_3", "Independent_68_4": "Independent_68_4", "Independent_68_5": "Independent_68_5", "Independent_68_6": "Independent_68_6", "Independent_68_7": "Independent_68_7", "Independent_68_8": "Independent_68_8", "Independent_68_9": "Independent_68_9", "Independent_68_10": "Independent_68_10", "Independent_68_11": "Independent_68_11", "Independent_68_12": "Independent_68_12", "Independent_68_13": "Independent_68_13", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_69_3": "Independent_69_3", "Independent_69_4": "Independent_69_4", "Independent_69_5": "Independent_69_5", "Independent_69_6": "Independent_69_6", "Independent_69_7": "Independent_69_7", "Independent_69_8": "Independent_69_8", "Independent_69_9": "Independent_69_9", "Independent_69_10": "Independent_69_10", "Independent_69_11": "Independent_69_11", "Independent_69_12": "Independent_69_12", "party_RPI": "party_RPI", "Independent_69_13": "Independent_69_13", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "Independent_70_2": "Independent_70_2", "Independent_70_3": "Independent_70_3", "Independent_70_4": "Independent_70_4", "Independent_70_5": "Independent_70_5", "Independent_70_6": "Independent_70_6", "party_PMSP": "party_PMSP", "Independent_70_7": "Independent_70_7", "Independent_71_1": "Independent_71_1", "Independent_71_2": "Independent_71_2", "Independent_71_3": "Independent_71_3", "Independent_71_4": "Independent_71_4", "Independent_71_5": "Independent_71_5", "Independent_71_6": "Independent_71_6", "Independent_71_7": "Independent_71_7", "Independent_71_8": "Independent_71_8", "Independent_71_9": "Independent_71_9", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_72_2": "Independent_72_2", "Independent_72_3": "Independent_72_3", "Independent_72_4": "Independent_72_4", "Independent_72_5": "Independent_72_5", "Independent_72_6": "Independent_72_6", "Independent_72_7": "Independent_72_7", "Independent_72_8": "Independent_72_8", "Independent_72_9": "Independent_72_9", "Independent_72_10": "Independent_72_10", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "Independent_73_3": "Independent_73_3", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_74_2": "Independent_74_2", "Independent_74_3": "Independent_74_3", "Independent_74_4": "Independent_74_4", "Independent_74_5": "Independent_74_5", "party_RKIVP": "party_RKIVP", "Independent_74_6": "Independent_74_6", "Independent_74_7": "Independent_74_7", "party_SP_I": "party_SP_I", "Independent_74_8": "Independent_74_8", "Independent_74_9": "Independent_74_9", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_75_2": "Independent_75_2", "Independent_75_3": "Independent_75_3", "Independent_75_4": "Independent_75_4", "Independent_75_5": "Independent_75_5", "Independent_75_6": "Independent_75_6", "Independent_75_7": "Independent_75_7", "Independent_75_8": "Independent_75_8", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_76_3": "Independent_76_3", "Independent_76_4": "Independent_76_4", "party_SBHSP": "party_SBHSP", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_77_2": "Independent_77_2", "Independent_77_3": "Independent_77_3", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_78_2": "Independent_78_2", "Independent_79_1": "Independent_79_1", "Independent_79_2": "Independent_79_2", "Independent_79_3": "Independent_79_3", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_80_2": "Independent_80_2", "Independent_80_3": "Independent_80_3", "Independent_80_4": "Independent_80_4", "Independent_80_5": "Independent_80_5", "Independent_80_6": "Independent_80_6", "Independent_80_7": "Independent_80_7", "Independent_80_8": "Independent_80_8", "Independent_80_9": "Independent_80_9", "Independent_80_10": "Independent_80_10", "Independent_80_11": "Independent_80_11", "Independent_80_12": "Independent_80_12", "Independent_80_13": "Independent_80_13", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "Independent_81_2": "Independent_81_2", "Independent_81_3": "Independent_81_3", "Independent_81_4": "Independent_81_4", "Independent_81_5": "Independent_81_5", "Independent_81_6": "Independent_81_6", "Independent_81_7": "Independent_81_7", "Independent_82_1": "Independent_82_1", "Independent_82_2": "Independent_82_2", "Independent_82_3": "Independent_82_3", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_83_2": "Independent_83_2", "Independent_83_3": "Independent_83_3", "Independent_84_1": "Independent_84_1", "Independent_84_2": "Independent_84_2", "Independent_84_3": "Independent_84_3", "Independent_84_4": "Independent_84_4", "Independent_85_1": "Independent_85_1", "Independent_85_2": "Independent_85_2", "Independent_85_3": "Independent_85_3", "Independent_85_4": "Independent_85_4", "Independent_85_5": "Independent_85_5", "Independent_85_6": "Independent_85_6", "Independent_85_7": "Independent_85_7", "Independent_85_8": "Independent_85_8", "Independent_85_9": "Independent_85_9", "Independent_86_1": "Independent_86_1", "Independent_86_2": "Independent_86_2", "Independent_86_3": "Independent_86_3", "party_RSPI": "party_RSPI", "Independent_86_4": "Independent_86_4", "Independent_86_5": "Independent_86_5", "Independent_88_1": "Independent_88_1", "Independent_88_2": "Independent_88_2", "Independent_88_3": "Independent_88_3", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_89_2": "Independent_89_2", "Independent_89_3": "Independent_89_3", "Independent_90_1": "Independent_90_1", "Independent_90_2": "Independent_90_2", "Independent_90_3": "Independent_90_3", "Independent_90_4": "Independent_90_4", "Independent_92_1": "Independent_92_1", "Independent_92_2": "Independent_92_2", "Independent_92_3": "Independent_92_3", "Independent_93_1": "Independent_93_1", "Independent_93_2": "Independent_93_2", "Independent_93_3": "Independent_93_3", "Independent_94_1": "Independent_94_1", "Independent_94_2": "Independent_94_2", "Independent_94_3": "Independent_94_3", "Independent_95_1": "Independent_95_1", "Independent_95_2": "Independent_95_2", "Independent_95_3": "Independent_95_3", "Independent_95_4": "Independent_95_4", "Independent_95_5": "Independent_95_5", "Independent_95_6": "Independent_95_6", "Independent_95_7": "Independent_95_7", "Independent_95_8": "Independent_95_8", "Independent_96_1": "Independent_96_1", "Independent_97_1": "Independent_97_1", "Independent_97_2": "Independent_97_2", "Independent_97_3": "Independent_97_3", "Independent_97_4": "Independent_97_4", "Independent_98_1": "Independent_98_1", "Independent_98_2": "Independent_98_2", "Independent_98_3": "Independent_98_3", "party_IUML": "party_IUML", "Independent_98_4": "Independent_98_4", "Independent_98_5": "Independent_98_5", "Independent_98_6": "Independent_98_6", "Independent_99_1": "Independent_99_1", "Independent_99_2": "Independent_99_2", "Independent_99_3": "Independent_99_3", "Independent_99_4": "Independent_99_4", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_100_2": "Independent_100_2", "party_PBI": "party_PBI", "Independent_100_3": "Independent_100_3", "Independent_101_1": "Independent_101_1", "Independent_102_1": "Independent_102_1", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_103_2": "Independent_103_2", "Independent_104_1": "Independent_104_1", "Independent_104_2": "Independent_104_2", "Independent_104_3": "Independent_104_3", "Independent_105_1": "Independent_105_1", "Independent_106_1": "Independent_106_1", "Independent_106_2": "Independent_106_2", "Independent_106_3": "Independent_106_3", "Independent_106_4": "Independent_106_4", "Independent_106_5": "Independent_106_5", "Independent_106_6": "Independent_106_6", "Independent_106_7": "Independent_106_7", "Independent_106_8": "Independent_106_8", "Independent_106_9": "Independent_106_9", "Independent_107_1": "Independent_107_1", "Independent_108_1": "Independent_108_1", "Independent_108_2": "Independent_108_2", "Independent_108_3": "Independent_108_3", "Independent_108_4": "Independent_108_4", "Independent_109_1": "Independent_109_1", "Independent_109_2": "Independent_109_2", "Independent_109_3": "Independent_109_3", "Independent_109_4": "Independent_109_4", "Independent_109_5": "Independent_109_5", "Independent_109_6": "Independent_109_6", "Independent_109_7": "Independent_109_7", "Independent_109_8": "Independent_109_8", "Independent_109_9": "Independent_109_9", "Independent_110_1": "Independent_110_1", "Independent_110_2": "Independent_110_2", "Independent_110_3": "Independent_110_3", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "Independent_111_2": "Independent_111_2", "Independent_111_3": "Independent_111_3", "Independent_111_4": "Independent_111_4", "Independent_111_5": "Independent_111_5", "Independent_111_6": "Independent_111_6", "Independent_111_7": "Independent_111_7", "Independent_111_8": "Independent_111_8", "Independent_111_9": "Independent_111_9", "Independent_111_10": "Independent_111_10", "Independent_112_1": "Independent_112_1", "Independent_112_2": "Independent_112_2", "Independent_112_3": "Independent_112_3", "Independent_112_4": "Independent_112_4", "Independent_113_1": "Independent_113_1", "Independent_113_2": "Independent_113_2", "Independent_113_3": "Independent_113_3", "Independent_113_4": "Independent_113_4", "Independent_114_1": "Independent_114_1", "Independent_114_2": "Independent_114_2", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_115_2": "Independent_115_2", "Independent_115_3": "Independent_115_3", "Independent_115_4": "Independent_115_4", "Independent_115_5": "Independent_115_5", "Independent_115_6": "Independent_115_6", "Independent_115_7": "Independent_115_7", "Independent_115_8": "Independent_115_8", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "Independent_116_2": "Independent_116_2", "Independent_116_3": "Independent_116_3", "Independent_116_4": "Independent_116_4", "Independent_116_5": "Independent_116_5", "Independent_117_1": "Independent_117_1", "Independent_117_2": "Independent_117_2", "Independent_118_1": "Independent_118_1", "Independent_118_2": "Independent_118_2", "Independent_119_1": "Independent_119_1", "Independent_119_2": "Independent_119_2", "Independent_120_1": "Independent_120_1", "Independent_121_1": "Independent_121_1", "Independent_121_2": "Independent_121_2", "Independent_122_1": "Independent_122_1", "Independent_122_2": "Independent_122_2", "Independent_122_3": "Independent_122_3", "Independent_122_4": "Independent_122_4", "Independent_123_1": "Independent_123_1", "Independent_123_2": "Independent_123_2", "Independent_123_3": "Independent_123_3", "Independent_124_1": "Independent_124_1", "Independent_124_2": "Independent_124_2", "Independent_124_3": "Independent_124_3", "Independent_124_4": "Independent_124_4", "Independent_124_5": "Independent_124_5", "Independent_124_6": "Independent_124_6", "Independent_124_7": "Independent_124_7", "Independent_125_1": "Independent_125_1", "Independent_125_2": "Independent_125_2", "Independent_125_3": "Independent_125_3", "Independent_125_4": "Independent_125_4", "Independent_125_5": "Independent_125_5", "Independent_125_6": "Independent_125_6", "Independent_126_1": "Independent_126_1", "Independent_126_2": "Independent_126_2", "Independent_126_3": "Independent_126_3", "Independent_126_4": "Independent_126_4", "Independent_126_5": "Independent_126_5", "Independent_126_6": "Independent_126_6", "Independent_126_7": "Independent_126_7", "Independent_126_8": "Independent_126_8", "Independent_127_1": "Independent_127_1", "Independent_127_2": "Independent_127_2", "Independent_127_3": "Independent_127_3", "Independent_127_4": "Independent_127_4", "Independent_128_1": "Independent_128_1", "Independent_128_2": "Independent_128_2", "Independent_128_3": "Independent_128_3", "Independent_128_4": "Independent_128_4", "Independent_128_5": "Independent_128_5", "Independent_128_6": "Independent_128_6", "Independent_128_7": "Independent_128_7", "Independent_129_1": "Independent_129_1", "Independent_129_2": "Independent_129_2", "Independent_130_1": "Independent_130_1", "Independent_130_2": "Independent_130_2", "Independent_130_3": "Independent_130_3", "Independent_130_4": "Independent_130_4", "Independent_130_5": "Independent_130_5", "Independent_130_6": "Independent_130_6", "Independent_130_7": "Independent_130_7", "Independent_131_1": "Independent_131_1", "Independent_131_2": "Independent_131_2", "Independent_131_3": "Independent_131_3", "party_SWJP": "party_SWJP", "Independent_133_1": "Independent_133_1", "Independent_133_2": "Independent_133_2", "Independent_134_1": "Independent_134_1", "Independent_134_2": "Independent_134_2", "Independent_135_1": "Independent_135_1", "Independent_135_2": "Independent_135_2", "Independent_135_3": "Independent_135_3", "Independent_135_4": "Independent_135_4", "Independent_135_5": "Independent_135_5", "Independent_135_6": "Independent_135_6", "Independent_135_7": "Independent_135_7", "Independent_136_1": "Independent_136_1", "Independent_136_2": "Independent_136_2", "Independent_136_3": "Independent_136_3", "Independent_136_4": "Independent_136_4", "Independent_137_1": "Independent_137_1", "Independent_137_2": "Independent_137_2", "Independent_138_1": "Independent_138_1", "Independent_138_2": "Independent_138_2", "Independent_138_3": "Independent_138_3", "Independent_138_4": "Independent_138_4", "Independent_138_5": "Independent_138_5", "Independent_138_6": "Independent_138_6", "Independent_139_1": "Independent_139_1", "Independent_139_2": "Independent_139_2", "Independent_139_3": "Independent_139_3", "Independent_140_1": "Independent_140_1", "Independent_140_2": "Independent_140_2", "Independent_140_3": "Independent_140_3", "Independent_141_1": "Independent_141_1", "Independent_141_2": "Independent_141_2", "Independent_141_3": "Independent_141_3", "Independent_141_4": "Independent_141_4", "Independent_141_5": "Independent_141_5", "Independent_142_1": "Independent_142_1", "Independent_142_2": "Independent_142_2", "Independent_142_3": "Independent_142_3", "Independent_142_4": "Independent_142_4", "party_MPTY": "party_MPTY", "party_PRBP": "party_PRBP", "Independent_143_1": "Independent_143_1", "Independent_143_2": "Independent_143_2", "Independent_143_3": "Independent_143_3", "Independent_143_4": "Independent_143_4", "Independent_143_5": "Independent_143_5", "party_RAP": "party_RAP", "Independent_143_6": "Independent_143_6", "Independent_143_7": "Independent_143_7", "Independent_144_1": "Independent_144_1", "Independent_144_2": "Independent_144_2", "Independent_144_3": "Independent_144_3", "Independent_144_4": "Independent_144_4", "Independent_145_1": "Independent_145_1", "Independent_145_2": "Independent_145_2", "Independent_145_3": "Independent_145_3", "Independent_146_1": "Independent_146_1", "Independent_146_2": "Independent_146_2", "Independent_147_1": "Independent_147_1", "Independent_147_2": "Independent_147_2", "Independent_147_3": "Independent_147_3", "Independent_147_4": "Independent_147_4", "Independent_147_5": "Independent_147_5", "Independent_147_6": "Independent_147_6", "Independent_148_1": "Independent_148_1", "Independent_148_2": "Independent_148_2", "Independent_150_1": "Independent_150_1", "Independent_150_2": "Independent_150_2", "Independent_150_3": "Independent_150_3", "Independent_150_4": "Independent_150_4", "Independent_150_5": "Independent_150_5", "Independent_151_1": "Independent_151_1", "Independent_151_2": "Independent_151_2", "party_BHBP": "party_BHBP", "Independent_151_3": "Independent_151_3", "party_RSP": "party_RSP", "Independent_152_1": "Independent_152_1", "Independent_152_2": "Independent_152_2", "Independent_152_3": "Independent_152_3", "party_JAMP": "party_JAMP", "Independent_152_4": "Independent_152_4", "Independent_153_1": "Independent_153_1", "Independent_153_2": "Independent_153_2", "Independent_153_3": "Independent_153_3", "Independent_154_1": "Independent_154_1", "Independent_154_2": "Independent_154_2", "Independent_154_3": "Independent_154_3", "Independent_154_4": "Independent_154_4", "Independent_154_5": "Independent_154_5", "Independent_154_6": "Independent_154_6", "Independent_155_1": "Independent_155_1", "Independent_155_2": "Independent_155_2", "party_PRSP": "party_PRSP", "Independent_156_1": "Independent_156_1", "Independent_156_2": "Independent_156_2", "Independent_156_3": "Independent_156_3", "Independent_156_4": "Independent_156_4", "Independent_156_5": "Independent_156_5", "Independent_156_6": "Independent_156_6", "Independent_157_1": "Independent_157_1", "Independent_158_1": "Independent_158_1", "Independent_158_2": "Independent_158_2", "Independent_158_3": "Independent_158_3", "Independent_158_4": "Independent_158_4", "Independent_158_5": "Independent_158_5", "Independent_158_6": "Independent_158_6", "Independent_158_7": "Independent_158_7", "Independent_159_1": "Independent_159_1", "Independent_159_2": "Independent_159_2", "Independent_159_3": "Independent_159_3", "Independent_159_4": "Independent_159_4", "Independent_160_1": "Independent_160_1", "Independent_160_2": "Independent_160_2", "Independent_160_3": "Independent_160_3", "Independent_160_4": "Independent_160_4", "Independent_161_1": "Independent_161_1", "Independent_161_2": "Independent_161_2", "Independent_161_3": "Independent_161_3", "Independent_161_4": "Independent_161_4", "Independent_161_5": "Independent_161_5", "Independent_162_1": "Independent_162_1", "Independent_162_2": "Independent_162_2", "Independent_162_3": "Independent_162_3", "Independent_162_4": "Independent_162_4", "Independent_162_5": "Independent_162_5", "Independent_163_1": "Independent_163_1", "Independent_163_2": "Independent_163_2", "Independent_164_1": "Independent_164_1", "Independent_164_2": "Independent_164_2", "Independent_164_3": "Independent_164_3", "Independent_165_1": "Independent_165_1", "Independent_165_2": "Independent_165_2", "Independent_165_3": "Independent_165_3", "Independent_165_4": "Independent_165_4", "Independent_166_1": "Independent_166_1", "Independent_166_2": "Independent_166_2", "Independent_167_1": "Independent_167_1", "Independent_167_2": "Independent_167_2", "Independent_167_3": "Independent_167_3", "Independent_167_4": "Independent_167_4", "Independent_167_5": "Independent_167_5", "Independent_167_6": "Independent_167_6", "Independent_167_7": "Independent_167_7", "Independent_168_1": "Independent_168_1", "Independent_168_2": "Independent_168_2", "Independent_168_3": "Independent_168_3", "Independent_169_1": "Independent_169_1", "Independent_169_2": "Independent_169_2", "Independent_169_3": "Independent_169_3", "Independent_169_4": "Independent_169_4", "Independent_169_5": "Independent_169_5", "Independent_169_6": "Independent_169_6", "Independent_170_1": "Independent_170_1", "Independent_170_2": "Independent_170_2", "Independent_170_3": "Independent_170_3", "Independent_170_4": "Independent_170_4", "Independent_170_5": "Independent_170_5", "Independent_170_6": "Independent_170_6", "Independent_171_1": "Independent_171_1", "Independent_171_2": "Independent_171_2", "Independent_171_3": "Independent_171_3", "Independent_171_4": "Independent_171_4", "Independent_171_5": "Independent_171_5", "Independent_171_6": "Independent_171_6", "Independent_172_1": "Independent_172_1", "Independent_172_2": "Independent_172_2", "Independent_172_3": "Independent_172_3", "Independent_173_1": "Independent_173_1", "Independent_173_2": "Independent_173_2", "Independent_173_3": "Independent_173_3", "Independent_174_1": "Independent_174_1", "Independent_174_2": "Independent_174_2", "Independent_175_1": "Independent_175_1", "Independent_175_2": "Independent_175_2", "Independent_176_1": "Independent_176_1", "Independent_176_2": "Independent_176_2", "Independent_176_3": "Independent_176_3", "Independent_180_1": "Independent_180_1", "Independent_180_2": "Independent_180_2", "Independent_180_3": "Independent_180_3", "Independent_182_1": "Independent_182_1", "Independent_182_2": "Independent_182_2", "Independent_182_3": "Independent_182_3", "Independent_182_4": "Independent_182_4", "Independent_183_1": "Independent_183_1", "Independent_183_2": "Independent_183_2", "Independent_183_3": "Independent_183_3", "Independent_183_4": "Independent_183_4", "Independent_183_5": "Independent_183_5", "Independent_183_6": "Independent_183_6", "Independent_183_7": "Independent_183_7", "Independent_184_1": "Independent_184_1", "Independent_184_2": "Independent_184_2", "Independent_184_3": "Independent_184_3", "Independent_184_4": "Independent_184_4", "Independent_185_1": "Independent_185_1", "Independent_185_2": "Independent_185_2", "Independent_185_3": "Independent_185_3", "Independent_185_4": "Independent_185_4", "Independent_185_5": "Independent_185_5", "Independent_185_6": "Independent_185_6", "Independent_186_1": "Independent_186_1", "Independent_186_2": "Independent_186_2", "Independent_186_3": "Independent_186_3", "Independent_186_4": "Independent_186_4", "Independent_187_1": "Independent_187_1", "Independent_187_2": "Independent_187_2", "Independent_188_1": "Independent_188_1", "Independent_188_2": "Independent_188_2", "Independent_190_1": "Independent_190_1", "Independent_191_1": "Independent_191_1", "Independent_192_1": "Independent_192_1", "Independent_192_2": "Independent_192_2", "Independent_193_1": "Independent_193_1", "Independent_193_2": "Independent_193_2", "Independent_193_3": "Independent_193_3", "Independent_193_4": "Independent_193_4", "Independent_193_5": "Independent_193_5", "Independent_194_1": "Independent_194_1", "Independent_194_2": "Independent_194_2", "Independent_194_3": "Independent_194_3", "Independent_194_4": "Independent_194_4", "Independent_196_1": "Independent_196_1", "Independent_197_1": "Independent_197_1", "Independent_197_2": "Independent_197_2", "Independent_198_1": "Independent_198_1", "Independent_199_1": "Independent_199_1", "Independent_199_2": "Independent_199_2", "Independent_199_3": "Independent_199_3", "Independent_199_4": "Independent_199_4", "Independent_201_1": "Independent_201_1", "Independent_201_2": "Independent_201_2", "Independent_201_3": "Independent_201_3", "Independent_201_4": "Independent_201_4", "Independent_201_5": "Independent_201_5", "Independent_201_6": "Independent_201_6", "Independent_201_7": "Independent_201_7", "Independent_201_8": "Independent_201_8", "Independent_201_9": "Independent_201_9", "Independent_201_10": "Independent_201_10", "Independent_201_11": "Independent_201_11", "Independent_202_1": "Independent_202_1", "Independent_202_2": "Independent_202_2", "Independent_202_3": "Independent_202_3", "Independent_202_4": "Independent_202_4", "Independent_203_1": "Independent_203_1", "Independent_203_2": "Independent_203_2", "Independent_203_3": "Independent_203_3", "Independent_203_4": "Independent_203_4", "Independent_203_5": "Independent_203_5", "Independent_203_6": "Independent_203_6", "Independent_204_1": "Independent_204_1", "Independent_204_2": "Independent_204_2", "Independent_204_3": "Independent_204_3", "Independent_204_4": "Independent_204_4", "party_SBI": "party_SBI", "Independent_204_5": "Independent_204_5", "Independent_205_1": "Independent_205_1", "Independent_205_2": "Independent_205_2", "Independent_205_3": "Independent_205_3", "Independent_206_1": "Independent_206_1", "Independent_206_2": "Independent_206_2", "Independent_206_3": "Independent_206_3", "Independent_206_4": "Independent_206_4", "Independent_206_5": "Independent_206_5", "Independent_206_6": "Independent_206_6", "Independent_206_7": "Independent_206_7", "Independent_206_8": "Independent_206_8", "Independent_206_9": "Independent_206_9", "Independent_207_1": "Independent_207_1", "Independent_207_2": "Independent_207_2", "Independent_208_1": "Independent_208_1", "Independent_208_2": "Independent_208_2", "Independent_208_3": "Independent_208_3", "Independent_208_4": "Independent_208_4", "Independent_208_5": "Independent_208_5", "Independent_208_6": "Independent_208_6", "Independent_208_7": "Independent_208_7", "Independent_208_8": "Independent_208_8", "Independent_208_9": "Independent_208_9", "Independent_208_10": "Independent_208_10", "Independent_209_1": "Independent_209_1", "Independent_209_2": "Independent_209_2", "Independent_209_3": "Independent_209_3", "Independent_209_4": "Independent_209_4", "Independent_210_1": "Independent_210_1", "Independent_210_2": "Independent_210_2", "Independent_211_1": "Independent_211_1", "Independent_211_2": "Independent_211_2", "Independent_211_3": "Independent_211_3", "Independent_212_1": "Independent_212_1", "Independent_212_2": "Independent_212_2", "Independent_212_3": "Independent_212_3", "Independent_212_4": "Independent_212_4", "Independent_212_5": "Independent_212_5", "Independent_212_6": "Independent_212_6", "Independent_212_7": "Independent_212_7", "Independent_212_8": "Independent_212_8", "Independent_213_1": "Independent_213_1", "Independent_213_2": "Independent_213_2", "Independent_213_3": "Independent_213_3", "Independent_214_1": "Independent_214_1", "Independent_215_1": "Independent_215_1", "Independent_215_2": "Independent_215_2", "Independent_215_3": "Independent_215_3", "Independent_216_1": "Independent_216_1", "Independent_216_2": "Independent_216_2", "Independent_217_1": "Independent_217_1", "Independent_217_2": "Independent_217_2", "Independent_217_3": "Independent_217_3", "Independent_217_4": "Independent_217_4", "Independent_218_1": "Independent_218_1", "Independent_218_2": "Independent_218_2", "Independent_218_3": "Independent_218_3", "Independent_220_1": "Independent_220_1", "Independent_220_2": "Independent_220_2", "Independent_220_3": "Independent_220_3", "Independent_220_4": "Independent_220_4", "Independent_220_5": "Independent_220_5", "Independent_220_6": "Independent_220_6", "Independent_220_7": "Independent_220_7", "Independent_220_8": "Independent_220_8", "Independent_220_9": "Independent_220_9", "Independent_220_10": "Independent_220_10", "Independent_221_1": "Independent_221_1", "Independent_221_2": "Independent_221_2", "Independent_221_3": "Independent_221_3", "Independent_222_1": "Independent_222_1", "Independent_223_1": "Independent_223_1", "Independent_223_2": "Independent_223_2", "Independent_223_3": "Independent_223_3", "Independent_223_4": "Independent_223_4", "Independent_223_5": "Independent_223_5", "Independent_224_1": "Independent_224_1", "Independent_224_2": "Independent_224_2", "Independent_224_3": "Independent_224_3", "Independent_224_4": "Independent_224_4", "Independent_224_5": "Independent_224_5", "party_BMSM": "party_BMSM", "Independent_224_6": "Independent_224_6", "Independent_224_7": "Independent_224_7", "Independent_225_1": "Independent_225_1", "Independent_225_2": "Independent_225_2", "Independent_226_1": "Independent_226_1", "Independent_226_2": "Independent_226_2", "Independent_227_1": "Independent_227_1", "Independent_227_2": "Independent_227_2", "Independent_227_3": "Independent_227_3", "Independent_228_1": "Independent_228_1", "Independent_228_2": "Independent_228_2", "Independent_229_1": "Independent_229_1", "Independent_229_2": "Independent_229_2", "Independent_229_3": "Independent_229_3", "Independent_229_4": "Independent_229_4", "Independent_230_1": "Independent_230_1", "Independent_230_2": "Independent_230_2", "Independent_230_3": "Independent_230_3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 230, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 230, "cast_gt_registered": 230}, "n_stations_flagged": 230, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:52:26.565873", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.646, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.666, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.65, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.522, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.275, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.65, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.522, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.522, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.407, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.407, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.582, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 230}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1e1a1c6a58204ede93d1379d3f68dd71", "name": "India 2013 local (overnight india-karnataka-2013-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2013, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Karnataka/Karnataka_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"BJP": "BJP", "INC": "INC", "BSP": "BSP", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "Independent_1_3": "Independent_1_3", "JD(S)": "JD(S)", "KJP": "KJP", "BSRCP": "BSRCP", "Independent_1_4": "Independent_1_4", "Independent_1_5": "Independent_1_5", "Independent_1_6": "Independent_1_6", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "LJP": "LJP", "Independent_2_3": "Independent_2_3", "Independent_2_4": "Independent_2_4", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "LSP": "LSP", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "NCP": "NCP", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "Independent_4_4": "Independent_4_4", "Independent_4_5": "Independent_4_5", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "KaSP": "KaSP", "Independent_5_2": "Independent_5_2", "Independent_5_3": "Independent_5_3", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "Independent_6_2": "Independent_6_2", "Independent_6_3": "Independent_6_3", "Independent_6_4": "Independent_6_4", "Independent_6_5": "Independent_6_5", "NPP": "NPP", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "SKP": "SKP", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "SJPA": "SJPA", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "Independent_9_2": "Independent_9_2", "Independent_9_3": "Independent_9_3", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "Independent_11_3": "Independent_11_3", "IUML": "IUML", "Independent_11_4": "Independent_11_4", "Independent_11_5": "Independent_11_5", "HJP": "HJP", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "SHS": "SHS", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "Independent_13_3": "Independent_13_3", "Independent_13_4": "Independent_13_4", "Independent_13_5": "Independent_13_5", "Independent_13_6": "Independent_13_6", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "Independent_14_3": "Independent_14_3", "Independent_14_4": "Independent_14_4", "Independent_14_5": "Independent_14_5", "Independent_14_6": "Independent_14_6", "Independent_14_7": "Independent_14_7", "Independent_14_8": "Independent_14_8", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_15_2": "Independent_15_2", "Independent_15_3": "Independent_15_3", "Independent_15_4": "Independent_15_4", "Independent_15_5": "Independent_15_5", "KAP": "KAP", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "SP": "SP", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_18_3": "Independent_18_3", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_21_2": "Independent_21_2", "Independent_21_3": "Independent_21_3", "Independent_21_4": "Independent_21_4", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_22_2": "Independent_22_2", "Independent_22_3": "Independent_22_3", "Independent_22_4": "Independent_22_4", "Independent_22_5": "Independent_22_5", "Independent_22_6": "Independent_22_6", "Independent_22_7": "Independent_22_7", "Independent_22_8": "Independent_22_8", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "WPOI": "WPOI", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "Independent_26_3": "Independent_26_3", "Independent_26_4": "Independent_26_4", "Independent_26_5": "Independent_26_5", "Independent_26_6": "Independent_26_6", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "Independent_27_3": "Independent_27_3", "Independent_27_4": "Independent_27_4", "Independent_27_5": "Independent_27_5", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "Independent_28_4": "Independent_28_4", "Independent_28_5": "Independent_28_5", "Independent_28_6": "Independent_28_6", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "Independent_29_4": "Independent_29_4", "Independent_29_5": "Independent_29_5", "Independent_29_6": "Independent_29_6", "Independent_29_7": "Independent_29_7", "Independent_29_8": "Independent_29_8", "Independent_29_9": "Independent_29_9", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "Independent_30_3": "Independent_30_3", "Independent_30_4": "Independent_30_4", "SDPI": "SDPI", "Independent_30_5": "Independent_30_5", "SUCI": "SUCI", "Independent_30_6": "Independent_30_6", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_31_2": "Independent_31_2", "Independent_31_3": "Independent_31_3", "Independent_31_4": "Independent_31_4", "Independent_31_5": "Independent_31_5", "Independent_31_6": "Independent_31_6", "Independent_31_7": "Independent_31_7", "Independent_31_8": "Independent_31_8", "Independent_31_9": "Independent_31_9", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "BDBRAJP": "BDBRAJP", "Independent_32_3": "Independent_32_3", "Independent_32_4": "Independent_32_4", "Independent_32_5": "Independent_32_5", "Independent_32_6": "Independent_32_6", "Independent_32_7": "Independent_32_7", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "Independent_33_4": "Independent_33_4", "Independent_33_5": "Independent_33_5", "Independent_33_6": "Independent_33_6", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_34_3": "Independent_34_3", "Independent_34_4": "Independent_34_4", "Independent_34_5": "Independent_34_5", "Independent_34_6": "Independent_34_6", "Independent_34_7": "Independent_34_7", "Independent_34_8": "Independent_34_8", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "CPI": "CPI", "Independent_35_2": "Independent_35_2", "Independent_35_3": "Independent_35_3", "Independent_35_4": "Independent_35_4", "Independent_35_5": "Independent_35_5", "Independent_35_6": "Independent_35_6", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_36_3": "Independent_36_3", "Independent_36_4": "Independent_36_4", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "Independent_37_3": "Independent_37_3", "Independent_37_4": "Independent_37_4", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_38_3": "Independent_38_3", "Independent_38_4": "Independent_38_4", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_39_2": "Independent_39_2", "Independent_39_3": "Independent_39_3", "Independent_39_4": "Independent_39_4", "Independent_39_5": "Independent_39_5", "Independent_39_6": "Independent_39_6", "KMP": "KMP", "Independent_39_7": "Independent_39_7", "Independent_39_8": "Independent_39_8", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_40_3": "Independent_40_3", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "Independent_41_3": "Independent_41_3", "Independent_41_4": "Independent_41_4", "Independent_41_5": "Independent_41_5", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_42_2": "Independent_42_2", "Independent_42_3": "Independent_42_3", "Independent_42_4": "Independent_42_4", "CPM": "CPM", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_43_2": "Independent_43_2", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "BHPP": "BHPP", "Independent_43_3": "Independent_43_3", "Independent_43_4": "Independent_43_4", "Independent_43_5": "Independent_43_5", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "SAJP": "SAJP", "Independent_44_3": "Independent_44_3", "Independent_44_4": "Independent_44_4", "Independent_44_5": "Independent_44_5", "Independent_44_6": "Independent_44_6", "Independent_44_7": "Independent_44_7", "Independent_44_8": "Independent_44_8", "Independent_44_9": "Independent_44_9", "Independent_44_10": "Independent_44_10", "Independent_44_11": "Independent_44_11", "Independent_44_12": "Independent_44_12", "Independent_44_13": "Independent_44_13", "Independent_44_14": "Independent_44_14", "INL": "INL", "NDEP": "NDEP", "AIFB(S)": "AIFB(S)", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_45_2": "Independent_45_2", "Independent_45_3": "Independent_45_3", "Independent_45_4": "Independent_45_4", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "RSPS": "RSPS", "Independent_46_3": "Independent_46_3", "Independent_46_4": "Independent_46_4", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "Independent_47_3": "Independent_47_3", "Independent_47_4": "Independent_47_4", "Independent_47_5": "Independent_47_5", "RPI": "RPI", "Independent_47_6": "Independent_47_6", "Independent_47_7": "Independent_47_7", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_48_2": "Independent_48_2", "Independent_48_3": "Independent_48_3", "Independent_48_4": "Independent_48_4", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "ABML(S)": "ABML(S)", "Independent_49_3": "Independent_49_3", "Independent_49_4": "Independent_49_4", "Independent_49_5": "Independent_49_5", "ANC": "ANC", "Independent_49_6": "Independent_49_6", "BPJP": "BPJP", "Independent_49_7": "Independent_49_7", "PPOI": "PPOI", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_50_3": "Independent_50_3", "Independent_50_4": "Independent_50_4", "Independent_50_5": "Independent_50_5", "Independent_50_6": "Independent_50_6", "Independent_50_7": "Independent_50_7", "Independent_50_8": "Independent_50_8", "Independent_50_9": "Independent_50_9", "Independent_50_10": "Independent_50_10", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_51_3": "Independent_51_3", "Independent_51_4": "Independent_51_4", "Independent_51_5": "Independent_51_5", "Independent_51_6": "Independent_51_6", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "Independent_52_3": "Independent_52_3", "Independent_52_4": "Independent_52_4", "Independent_52_5": "Independent_52_5", "Independent_52_6": "Independent_52_6", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "Independent_53_2": "Independent_53_2", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_54_3": "Independent_54_3", "Independent_54_4": "Independent_54_4", "Independent_54_5": "Independent_54_5", "Independent_54_6": "Independent_54_6", "Independent_54_7": "Independent_54_7", "Independent_54_8": "Independent_54_8", "Independent_54_9": "Independent_54_9", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_55_2": "Independent_55_2", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_57_2": "Independent_57_2", "Independent_57_3": "Independent_57_3", "KRRS": "KRRS", "Independent_57_4": "Independent_57_4", "Independent_57_5": "Independent_57_5", "Independent_58_1": "Independent_58_1", "Independent_58_2": "Independent_58_2", "Independent_58_3": "Independent_58_3", "Independent_58_4": "Independent_58_4", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_59_2": "Independent_59_2", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "Independent_60_3": "Independent_60_3", "Independent_60_4": "Independent_60_4", "Independent_60_5": "Independent_60_5", "Independent_60_6": "Independent_60_6", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "Independent_61_3": "Independent_61_3", "Independent_61_4": "Independent_61_4", "Independent_61_5": "Independent_61_5", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "Independent_61_6": "Independent_61_6", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "Independent_63_3": "Independent_63_3", "Independent_63_4": "Independent_63_4", "Independent_63_5": "Independent_63_5", "Independent_63_6": "Independent_63_6", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_65_2": "Independent_65_2", "Independent_65_3": "Independent_65_3", "Independent_65_4": "Independent_65_4", "Independent_65_5": "Independent_65_5", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "SK": "SK", "Independent_67_1": "Independent_67_1", "Independent_67_2": "Independent_67_2", "Independent_67_3": "Independent_67_3", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "Independent_68_3": "Independent_68_3", "Independent_68_4": "Independent_68_4", "RCMP": "RCMP", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_69_3": "Independent_69_3", "Independent_69_4": "Independent_69_4", "Independent_69_5": "Independent_69_5", "Independent_69_6": "Independent_69_6", "Independent_69_7": "Independent_69_7", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "Independent_70_2": "Independent_70_2", "Independent_70_3": "Independent_70_3", "Independent_71_1": "Independent_71_1", "Independent_71_2": "Independent_71_2", "Independent_71_3": "Independent_71_3", "Independent_71_4": "Independent_71_4", "Independent_71_5": "Independent_71_5", "Independent_71_6": "Independent_71_6", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_72_2": "Independent_72_2", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "Independent_73_3": "Independent_73_3", "Independent_73_4": "Independent_73_4", "Independent_73_5": "Independent_73_5", "Independent_73_6": "Independent_73_6", "Independent_73_7": "Independent_73_7", "Independent_73_8": "Independent_73_8", "Independent_73_9": "Independent_73_9", "Independent_73_10": "Independent_73_10", "Independent_73_11": "Independent_73_11", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_74_2": "Independent_74_2", "Independent_74_3": "Independent_74_3", "Independent_74_4": "Independent_74_4", "Independent_74_5": "Independent_74_5", "Independent_74_6": "Independent_74_6", "BhJD": "BhJD", "Independent_74_7": "Independent_74_7", "Independent_74_8": "Independent_74_8", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_75_2": "Independent_75_2", "Independent_75_3": "Independent_75_3", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_76_3": "Independent_76_3", "Independent_76_4": "Independent_76_4", "Independent_76_5": "Independent_76_5", "Independent_76_6": "Independent_76_6", "Independent_76_7": "Independent_76_7", "Independent_76_8": "Independent_76_8", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_77_2": "Independent_77_2", "Independent_77_3": "Independent_77_3", "Independent_77_4": "Independent_77_4", "Independent_77_5": "Independent_77_5", "Independent_77_6": "Independent_77_6", "Independent_77_7": "Independent_77_7", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "HND": "HND", "Independent_78_2": "Independent_78_2", "Independent_78_3": "Independent_78_3", "Independent_79_1": "Independent_79_1", "Independent_79_2": "Independent_79_2", "Independent_79_3": "Independent_79_3", "Independent_79_4": "Independent_79_4", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "Independent_81_2": "Independent_81_2", "Independent_81_3": "Independent_81_3", "Independent_81_4": "Independent_81_4", "Independent_81_5": "Independent_81_5", "Independent_81_6": "Independent_81_6", "Independent_82_1": "Independent_82_1", "Independent_82_2": "Independent_82_2", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_83_2": "Independent_83_2", "Independent_83_3": "Independent_83_3", "Independent_84_1": "Independent_84_1", "Independent_84_2": "Independent_84_2", "Independent_84_3": "Independent_84_3", "Independent_85_1": "Independent_85_1", "Independent_85_2": "Independent_85_2", "Independent_85_3": "Independent_85_3", "Independent_85_4": "Independent_85_4", "Independent_85_5": "Independent_85_5", "Independent_85_6": "Independent_85_6", "Independent_86_1": "Independent_86_1", "Independent_86_2": "Independent_86_2", "Independent_86_3": "Independent_86_3", "Independent_86_4": "Independent_86_4", "Independent_86_5": "Independent_86_5", "Independent_86_6": "Independent_86_6", "Independent_86_7": "Independent_86_7", "Independent_86_8": "Independent_86_8", "Independent_86_9": "Independent_86_9", "Independent_87_1": "Independent_87_1", "Independent_87_2": "Independent_87_2", "Independent_87_3": "Independent_87_3", "Independent_87_4": "Independent_87_4", "Independent_87_5": "Independent_87_5", "Independent_87_6": "Independent_87_6", "Independent_88_1": "Independent_88_1", "Independent_88_2": "Independent_88_2", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_89_2": "Independent_89_2", "Independent_89_3": "Independent_89_3", "Independent_89_4": "Independent_89_4", "Independent_89_5": "Independent_89_5", "Independent_89_6": "Independent_89_6", "Independent_90_1": "Independent_90_1", "Independent_90_2": "Independent_90_2", "Independent_90_3": "Independent_90_3", "Independent_90_4": "Independent_90_4", "Independent_90_5": "Independent_90_5", "Independent_90_6": "Independent_90_6", "Independent_90_7": "Independent_90_7", "Independent_90_8": "Independent_90_8", "Independent_90_9": "Independent_90_9", "Independent_90_10": "Independent_90_10", "Independent_90_11": "Independent_90_11", "Independent_90_12": "Independent_90_12", "Independent_91_1": "Independent_91_1", "Independent_91_2": "Independent_91_2", "Independent_91_3": "Independent_91_3", "Independent_92_1": "Independent_92_1", "Independent_93_1": "Independent_93_1", "Independent_93_2": "Independent_93_2", "Independent_93_3": "Independent_93_3", "Independent_93_4": "Independent_93_4", "Independent_93_5": "Independent_93_5", "AMJP": "AMJP", "Independent_94_1": "Independent_94_1", "Independent_94_2": "Independent_94_2", "Independent_94_3": "Independent_94_3", "Independent_94_4": "Independent_94_4", "Independent_94_5": "Independent_94_5", "Independent_94_6": "Independent_94_6", "Independent_94_7": "Independent_94_7", "Independent_94_8": "Independent_94_8", "Independent_94_9": "Independent_94_9", "Independent_94_10": "Independent_94_10", "Independent_94_11": "Independent_94_11", "Independent_94_12": "Independent_94_12", "Independent_94_13": "Independent_94_13", "Independent_94_14": "Independent_94_14", "Independent_94_15": "Independent_94_15", "Independent_94_16": "Independent_94_16", "Independent_94_17": "Independent_94_17", "Independent_94_18": "Independent_94_18", "Independent_94_19": "Independent_94_19", "Independent_95_1": "Independent_95_1", "Independent_95_2": "Independent_95_2", "Independent_95_3": "Independent_95_3", "Independent_96_1": "Independent_96_1", "Independent_96_2": "Independent_96_2", "Independent_96_3": "Independent_96_3", "Independent_96_4": "Independent_96_4", "Independent_96_5": "Independent_96_5", "Independent_96_6": "Independent_96_6", "Independent_97_1": "Independent_97_1", "Independent_97_2": "Independent_97_2", "Independent_97_3": "Independent_97_3", "Independent_97_4": "Independent_97_4", "Independent_97_5": "Independent_97_5", "Independent_97_6": "Independent_97_6", "Independent_97_7": "Independent_97_7", "Independent_98_1": "Independent_98_1", "Independent_98_2": "Independent_98_2", "Independent_98_3": "Independent_98_3", "Independent_99_1": "Independent_99_1", "Independent_99_2": "Independent_99_2", "Independent_99_3": "Independent_99_3", "Independent_99_4": "Independent_99_4", "Independent_99_5": "Independent_99_5", "Independent_99_6": "Independent_99_6", "Independent_99_7": "Independent_99_7", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_100_2": "Independent_100_2", "Independent_100_3": "Independent_100_3", "Independent_100_4": "Independent_100_4", "Independent_100_5": "Independent_100_5", "Independent_100_6": "Independent_100_6", "Independent_100_7": "Independent_100_7", "Independent_101_1": "Independent_101_1", "Independent_101_2": "Independent_101_2", "Independent_101_3": "Independent_101_3", "Independent_102_1": "Independent_102_1", "Independent_102_2": "Independent_102_2", "Independent_102_3": "Independent_102_3", "Independent_102_4": "Independent_102_4", "Independent_102_5": "Independent_102_5", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_103_2": "Independent_103_2", "Independent_103_3": "Independent_103_3", "Independent_103_4": "Independent_103_4", "Independent_103_5": "Independent_103_5", "Independent_103_6": "Independent_103_6", "Independent_104_1": "Independent_104_1", "Independent_104_2": "Independent_104_2", "Independent_104_3": "Independent_104_3", "Independent_104_4": "Independent_104_4", "Independent_104_5": "Independent_104_5", "Independent_104_6": "Independent_104_6", "Independent_105_1": "Independent_105_1", "Independent_105_2": "Independent_105_2", "Independent_105_3": "Independent_105_3", "Independent_105_4": "Independent_105_4", "Independent_105_5": "Independent_105_5", "Independent_106_1": "Independent_106_1", "Independent_106_2": "Independent_106_2", "VJCP": "VJCP", "Independent_106_3": "Independent_106_3", "Independent_106_4": "Independent_106_4", "Independent_106_5": "Independent_106_5", "Independent_106_6": "Independent_106_6", "Independent_106_7": "Independent_106_7", "Independent_106_8": "Independent_106_8", "Independent_106_9": "Independent_106_9", "Independent_107_1": "Independent_107_1", "Independent_107_2": "Independent_107_2", "Independent_107_3": "Independent_107_3", "Independent_107_4": "Independent_107_4", "Independent_107_5": "Independent_107_5", "Independent_108_1": "Independent_108_1", "Independent_108_2": "Independent_108_2", "Independent_108_3": "Independent_108_3", "Independent_108_4": "Independent_108_4", "Independent_108_5": "Independent_108_5", "Independent_108_6": "Independent_108_6", "Independent_108_7": "Independent_108_7", "KCVP": "KCVP", "Independent_108_8": "Independent_108_8", "Independent_108_9": "Independent_108_9", "Independent_109_1": "Independent_109_1", "Independent_109_2": "Independent_109_2", "Independent_109_3": "Independent_109_3", "Independent_109_4": "Independent_109_4", "Independent_110_1": "Independent_110_1", "Independent_110_2": "Independent_110_2", "Independent_110_3": "Independent_110_3", "Independent_110_4": "Independent_110_4", "Independent_110_5": "Independent_110_5", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "Independent_111_2": "Independent_111_2", "Independent_111_3": "Independent_111_3", "Independent_111_4": "Independent_111_4", "Independent_111_5": "Independent_111_5", "Independent_112_1": "Independent_112_1", "Independent_112_2": "Independent_112_2", "Independent_112_3": "Independent_112_3", "Independent_112_4": "Independent_112_4", "Independent_112_5": "Independent_112_5", "Independent_112_6": "Independent_112_6", "Independent_112_7": "Independent_112_7", "Independent_112_8": "Independent_112_8", "Independent_112_9": "Independent_112_9", "Independent_113_1": "Independent_113_1", "Independent_113_2": "Independent_113_2", "Independent_113_3": "Independent_113_3", "Independent_113_4": "Independent_113_4", "Independent_113_5": "Independent_113_5", "Independent_113_6": "Independent_113_6", "Independent_113_7": "Independent_113_7", "Independent_114_1": "Independent_114_1", "Independent_114_2": "Independent_114_2", "Independent_114_3": "Independent_114_3", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_115_2": "Independent_115_2", "Independent_115_3": "Independent_115_3", "Independent_115_4": "Independent_115_4", "Independent_115_5": "Independent_115_5", "Independent_115_6": "Independent_115_6", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "Independent_116_2": "Independent_116_2", "Independent_116_3": "Independent_116_3", "Independent_116_4": "Independent_116_4", "Independent_117_1": "Independent_117_1", "Independent_117_2": "Independent_117_2", "Independent_117_3": "Independent_117_3", "Independent_118_1": "Independent_118_1", "Independent_118_2": "Independent_118_2", "Independent_118_3": "Independent_118_3", "Independent_118_4": "Independent_118_4", "Independent_118_5": "Independent_118_5", "Independent_118_6": "Independent_118_6", "Independent_119_1": "Independent_119_1", "Independent_119_2": "Independent_119_2", "Independent_119_3": "Independent_119_3", "Independent_120_1": "Independent_120_1", "Independent_120_2": "Independent_120_2", "Independent_120_3": "Independent_120_3", "Independent_121_1": "Independent_121_1", "Independent_121_2": "Independent_121_2", "Independent_121_3": "Independent_121_3", "Independent_121_4": "Independent_121_4", "Independent_121_5": "Independent_121_5", "Independent_121_6": "Independent_121_6", "Independent_121_7": "Independent_121_7", "Independent_122_1": "Independent_122_1", "Independent_122_2": "Independent_122_2", "Independent_122_3": "Independent_122_3", "Independent_122_4": "Independent_122_4", "Independent_123_1": "Independent_123_1", "Independent_123_2": "Independent_123_2", "Independent_123_3": "Independent_123_3", "Independent_124_1": "Independent_124_1", "Independent_124_2": "Independent_124_2", "Independent_125_1": "Independent_125_1", "Independent_125_2": "Independent_125_2", "Independent_125_3": "Independent_125_3", "Independent_125_4": "Independent_125_4", "Independent_125_5": "Independent_125_5", "Independent_125_6": "Independent_125_6", "Independent_125_7": "Independent_125_7", "Independent_126_1": "Independent_126_1", "Independent_126_2": "Independent_126_2", "Independent_126_3": "Independent_126_3", "Independent_126_4": "Independent_126_4", "Independent_126_5": "Independent_126_5", "Independent_126_6": "Independent_126_6", "Independent_126_7": "Independent_126_7", "Independent_126_8": "Independent_126_8", "Independent_126_9": "Independent_126_9", "Independent_127_1": "Independent_127_1", "Independent_127_2": "Independent_127_2", "Independent_127_3": "Independent_127_3", "Independent_128_1": "Independent_128_1", "Independent_128_2": "Independent_128_2", "Independent_129_1": "Independent_129_1", "Independent_129_2": "Independent_129_2", "Independent_129_3": "Independent_129_3", "Independent_129_4": "Independent_129_4", "Independent_130_1": "Independent_130_1", "Independent_130_2": "Independent_130_2", "Independent_130_3": "Independent_130_3", "Independent_130_4": "Independent_130_4", "Independent_130_5": "Independent_130_5", "Independent_130_6": "Independent_130_6", "Independent_131_1": "Independent_131_1", "Independent_131_2": "Independent_131_2", "Independent_131_3": "Independent_131_3", "Independent_132_1": "Independent_132_1", "Independent_132_2": "Independent_132_2", "Independent_132_3": "Independent_132_3", "Independent_132_4": "Independent_132_4", "Independent_132_5": "Independent_132_5", "Independent_132_6": "Independent_132_6", "Independent_132_7": "Independent_132_7", "Independent_133_1": "Independent_133_1", "Independent_133_2": "Independent_133_2", "Independent_133_3": "Independent_133_3", "Independent_133_4": "Independent_133_4", "Independent_133_5": "Independent_133_5", "Independent_133_6": "Independent_133_6", "Independent_133_7": "Independent_133_7", "Independent_133_8": "Independent_133_8", "Independent_134_1": "Independent_134_1", "Independent_134_2": "Independent_134_2", "Independent_134_3": "Independent_134_3", "Independent_134_4": "Independent_134_4", "Independent_134_5": "Independent_134_5", "Independent_134_6": "Independent_134_6", "Independent_135_1": "Independent_135_1", "Independent_135_2": "Independent_135_2", "Independent_135_3": "Independent_135_3", "Independent_135_4": "Independent_135_4", "Independent_135_5": "Independent_135_5", "Independent_135_6": "Independent_135_6", "Independent_135_7": "Independent_135_7", "Independent_136_1": "Independent_136_1", "Independent_136_2": "Independent_136_2", "Independent_136_3": "Independent_136_3", "Independent_136_4": "Independent_136_4", "Independent_136_5": "Independent_136_5", "Independent_137_1": "Independent_137_1", "Independent_137_2": "Independent_137_2", "Independent_137_3": "Independent_137_3", "Independent_137_4": "Independent_137_4", "Independent_137_5": "Independent_137_5", "Independent_138_1": "Independent_138_1", "Independent_138_2": "Independent_138_2", "Independent_138_3": "Independent_138_3", "Independent_138_4": "Independent_138_4", "Independent_138_5": "Independent_138_5", "Independent_138_6": "Independent_138_6", "Independent_138_7": "Independent_138_7", "Independent_138_8": "Independent_138_8", "Independent_138_9": "Independent_138_9", "Independent_138_10": "Independent_138_10", "Independent_138_11": "Independent_138_11", "Independent_138_12": "Independent_138_12", "Independent_138_13": "Independent_138_13", "Independent_138_14": "Independent_138_14", "Independent_138_15": "Independent_138_15", "Independent_139_1": "Independent_139_1", "Independent_139_2": "Independent_139_2", "Independent_139_3": "Independent_139_3", "Independent_139_4": "Independent_139_4", "Independent_139_5": "Independent_139_5", "Independent_139_6": "Independent_139_6", "Independent_139_7": "Independent_139_7", "Independent_140_1": "Independent_140_1", "Independent_140_2": "Independent_140_2", "Independent_140_3": "Independent_140_3", "Independent_140_4": "Independent_140_4", "Independent_140_5": "Independent_140_5", "Independent_140_6": "Independent_140_6", "Independent_140_7": "Independent_140_7", "Independent_140_8": "Independent_140_8", "Independent_140_9": "Independent_140_9", "Independent_140_10": "Independent_140_10", "Independent_140_11": "Independent_140_11", "Independent_140_12": "Independent_140_12", "Independent_140_13": "Independent_140_13", "Independent_140_14": "Independent_140_14", "Independent_140_15": "Independent_140_15", "Independent_140_16": "Independent_140_16", "Independent_140_17": "Independent_140_17", "Independent_140_18": "Independent_140_18", "Independent_140_19": "Independent_140_19", "Independent_141_1": "Independent_141_1", "Independent_141_2": "Independent_141_2", "Independent_141_3": "Independent_141_3", "Independent_141_4": "Independent_141_4", "Independent_141_5": "Independent_141_5", "Independent_141_6": "Independent_141_6", "Independent_142_1": "Independent_142_1", "Independent_142_2": "Independent_142_2", "Independent_142_3": "Independent_142_3", "Independent_142_4": "Independent_142_4", "Independent_143_1": "Independent_143_1", "Independent_143_2": "Independent_143_2", "Independent_143_3": "Independent_143_3", "Independent_143_4": "Independent_143_4", "Independent_143_5": "Independent_143_5", "Independent_143_6": "Independent_143_6", "Independent_143_7": "Independent_143_7", "Independent_143_8": "Independent_143_8", "Independent_144_1": "Independent_144_1", "Independent_144_2": "Independent_144_2", "Independent_145_1": "Independent_145_1", "Independent_145_2": "Independent_145_2", "Independent_145_3": "Independent_145_3", "Independent_145_4": "Independent_145_4", "Independent_145_5": "Independent_145_5", "Independent_145_6": "Independent_145_6", "Independent_145_7": "Independent_145_7", "Independent_145_8": "Independent_145_8", "Independent_145_9": "Independent_145_9", "Independent_145_10": "Independent_145_10", "Independent_145_11": "Independent_145_11", "Independent_145_12": "Independent_145_12", "ADMK": "ADMK", "Independent_146_1": "Independent_146_1", "Independent_146_2": "Independent_146_2", "BRPP": "BRPP", "Independent_146_3": "Independent_146_3", "Independent_146_4": "Independent_146_4", "Independent_146_5": "Independent_146_5", "Independent_146_6": "Independent_146_6", "Independent_146_7": "Independent_146_7", "Independent_146_8": "Independent_146_8", "Independent_147_1": "Independent_147_1", "Independent_147_2": "Independent_147_2", "Independent_147_3": "Independent_147_3", "Independent_147_4": "Independent_147_4", "Independent_147_5": "Independent_147_5", "Independent_147_6": "Independent_147_6", "Independent_148_1": "Independent_148_1", "Independent_148_2": "Independent_148_2", "Independent_148_3": "Independent_148_3", "Independent_148_4": "Independent_148_4", "Independent_148_5": "Independent_148_5", "Independent_148_6": "Independent_148_6", "Independent_148_7": "Independent_148_7", "Independent_148_8": "Independent_148_8", "Independent_148_9": "Independent_148_9", "Independent_149_1": "Independent_149_1", "Independent_149_2": "Independent_149_2", "Independent_149_3": "Independent_149_3", "Independent_149_4": "Independent_149_4", "Independent_149_5": "Independent_149_5", "Independent_149_6": "Independent_149_6", "Independent_149_7": "Independent_149_7", "Independent_149_8": "Independent_149_8", "Independent_150_1": "Independent_150_1", "Independent_150_2": "Independent_150_2", "Independent_150_3": "Independent_150_3", "Independent_150_4": "Independent_150_4", "Independent_150_5": "Independent_150_5", "Independent_150_6": "Independent_150_6", "Independent_150_7": "Independent_150_7", "Independent_151_1": "Independent_151_1", "Independent_151_2": "Independent_151_2", "Independent_151_3": "Independent_151_3", "Independent_151_4": "Independent_151_4", "Independent_151_5": "Independent_151_5", "Independent_151_6": "Independent_151_6", "Independent_151_7": "Independent_151_7", "Independent_151_8": "Independent_151_8", "Independent_151_9": "Independent_151_9", "Independent_151_10": "Independent_151_10", "Independent_151_11": "Independent_151_11", "Independent_151_12": "Independent_151_12", "Independent_151_13": "Independent_151_13", "Independent_151_14": "Independent_151_14", "Independent_151_15": "Independent_151_15", "Independent_151_16": "Independent_151_16", "Independent_151_17": "Independent_151_17", "Independent_152_1": "Independent_152_1", "Independent_152_2": "Independent_152_2", "Independent_152_3": "Independent_152_3", "Independent_152_4": "Independent_152_4", "MPHP": "MPHP", "Independent_152_5": "Independent_152_5", "Independent_152_6": "Independent_152_6", "Independent_152_7": "Independent_152_7", "Independent_153_1": "Independent_153_1", "Independent_153_2": "Independent_153_2", "Independent_153_3": "Independent_153_3", "Independent_153_4": "Independent_153_4", "Independent_153_5": "Independent_153_5", "Independent_153_6": "Independent_153_6", "Independent_154_1": "Independent_154_1", "Independent_154_2": "Independent_154_2", "Independent_154_3": "Independent_154_3", "Independent_154_4": "Independent_154_4", "Independent_154_5": "Independent_154_5", "Independent_154_6": "Independent_154_6", "Independent_154_7": "Independent_154_7", "Independent_154_8": "Independent_154_8", "KDC": "KDC", "PPIS": "PPIS", "Independent_155_1": "Independent_155_1", "Independent_155_2": "Independent_155_2", "Independent_155_3": "Independent_155_3", "Independent_155_4": "Independent_155_4", "Independent_155_5": "Independent_155_5", "Independent_155_6": "Independent_155_6", "Independent_155_7": "Independent_155_7", "Independent_155_8": "Independent_155_8", "Independent_155_9": "Independent_155_9", "Independent_155_10": "Independent_155_10", "Independent_155_11": "Independent_155_11", "Independent_155_12": "Independent_155_12", "Independent_155_13": "Independent_155_13", "Independent_156_1": "Independent_156_1", "Independent_156_2": "Independent_156_2", "Independent_156_3": "Independent_156_3", "Independent_156_4": "Independent_156_4", "Independent_156_5": "Independent_156_5", "Independent_156_6": "Independent_156_6", "Independent_156_7": "Independent_156_7", "Independent_157_1": "Independent_157_1", "Independent_157_2": "Independent_157_2", "Independent_157_3": "Independent_157_3", "Independent_157_4": "Independent_157_4", "Independent_157_5": "Independent_157_5", "Independent_157_6": "Independent_157_6", "Independent_158_1": "Independent_158_1", "Independent_158_2": "Independent_158_2", "Independent_158_3": "Independent_158_3", "Independent_158_4": "Independent_158_4", "Independent_158_5": "Independent_158_5", "Independent_158_6": "Independent_158_6", "Independent_158_7": "Independent_158_7", "Independent_158_8": "Independent_158_8", "Independent_158_9": "Independent_158_9", "Independent_158_10": "Independent_158_10", "Independent_158_11": "Independent_158_11", "Independent_158_12": "Independent_158_12", "Independent_158_13": "Independent_158_13", "Independent_158_14": "Independent_158_14", "Independent_159_1": "Independent_159_1", "Independent_159_2": "Independent_159_2", "Independent_159_3": "Independent_159_3", "Independent_159_4": "Independent_159_4", "Independent_159_5": "Independent_159_5", "Independent_160_1": "Independent_160_1", "Independent_160_2": "Independent_160_2", "Independent_160_3": "Independent_160_3", "Independent_161_1": "Independent_161_1", "Independent_161_2": "Independent_161_2", "Independent_161_3": "Independent_161_3", "Independent_162_1": "Independent_162_1", "Independent_162_2": "Independent_162_2", "Independent_162_3": "Independent_162_3", "Independent_162_4": "Independent_162_4", "Independent_162_5": "Independent_162_5", "Independent_162_6": "Independent_162_6", "Independent_162_7": "Independent_162_7", "Independent_162_8": "Independent_162_8", "Independent_162_9": "Independent_162_9", "Independent_162_10": "Independent_162_10", "Independent_163_1": "Independent_163_1", "Independent_163_2": "Independent_163_2", "Independent_163_3": "Independent_163_3", "Independent_163_4": "Independent_163_4", "Independent_163_5": "Independent_163_5", "Independent_163_6": "Independent_163_6", "Independent_163_7": "Independent_163_7", "Independent_163_8": "Independent_163_8", "Independent_164_1": "Independent_164_1", "Independent_164_2": "Independent_164_2", "Independent_164_3": "Independent_164_3", "Independent_164_4": "Independent_164_4", "Independent_164_5": "Independent_164_5", "Independent_165_1": "Independent_165_1", "Independent_165_2": "Independent_165_2", "Independent_165_3": "Independent_165_3", "Independent_165_4": "Independent_165_4", "Independent_165_5": "Independent_165_5", "Independent_165_6": "Independent_165_6", "Independent_165_7": "Independent_165_7", "JVBP": "JVBP", "Independent_165_8": "Independent_165_8", "Independent_165_9": "Independent_165_9", "Independent_166_1": "Independent_166_1", "Independent_166_2": "Independent_166_2", "Independent_166_3": "Independent_166_3", "Independent_166_4": "Independent_166_4", "Independent_167_1": "Independent_167_1", "Independent_167_2": "Independent_167_2", "Independent_167_3": "Independent_167_3", "Independent_167_4": "Independent_167_4", "Independent_167_5": "Independent_167_5", "Independent_167_6": "Independent_167_6", "Independent_167_7": "Independent_167_7", "Independent_167_8": "Independent_167_8", "Independent_167_9": "Independent_167_9", "Independent_167_10": "Independent_167_10", "Independent_167_11": "Independent_167_11", "Independent_167_12": "Independent_167_12", "Independent_167_13": "Independent_167_13", "Independent_167_14": "Independent_167_14", "SDP": "SDP", "Independent_168_1": "Independent_168_1", "Independent_168_2": "Independent_168_2", "Independent_168_3": "Independent_168_3", "Independent_168_4": "Independent_168_4", "Independent_168_5": "Independent_168_5", "Independent_168_6": "Independent_168_6", "Independent_168_7": "Independent_168_7", "Independent_168_8": "Independent_168_8", "Independent_168_9": "Independent_168_9", "Independent_168_10": "Independent_168_10", "Independent_168_11": "Independent_168_11", "Independent_168_12": "Independent_168_12", "Independent_168_13": "Independent_168_13", "Independent_169_1": "Independent_169_1", "Independent_169_2": "Independent_169_2", "Independent_169_3": "Independent_169_3", "Independent_169_4": "Independent_169_4", "Independent_169_5": "Independent_169_5", "Independent_169_6": "Independent_169_6", "Independent_169_7": "Independent_169_7", "Independent_169_8": "Independent_169_8", "Independent_169_9": "Independent_169_9", "Independent_169_10": "Independent_169_10", "Independent_169_11": "Independent_169_11", "Independent_170_1": "Independent_170_1", "Independent_170_2": "Independent_170_2", "Independent_170_3": "Independent_170_3", "Independent_170_4": "Independent_170_4", "Independent_170_5": "Independent_170_5", "Independent_170_6": "Independent_170_6", "Independent_170_7": "Independent_170_7", "Independent_170_8": "Independent_170_8", "Independent_171_1": "Independent_171_1", "Independent_171_2": "Independent_171_2", "Independent_171_3": "Independent_171_3", "Independent_171_4": "Independent_171_4", "Independent_171_5": "Independent_171_5", "Independent_171_6": "Independent_171_6", "Independent_171_7": "Independent_171_7", "Independent_171_8": "Independent_171_8", "Independent_172_1": "Independent_172_1", "Independent_172_2": "Independent_172_2", "Independent_173_1": "Independent_173_1", "Independent_173_2": "Independent_173_2", "Independent_173_3": "Independent_173_3", "Independent_173_4": "Independent_173_4", "Independent_173_5": "Independent_173_5", "Independent_173_6": "Independent_173_6", "Independent_173_7": "Independent_173_7", "Independent_173_8": "Independent_173_8", "Independent_173_9": "Independent_173_9", "Independent_173_10": "Independent_173_10", "Independent_174_1": "Independent_174_1", "Independent_174_2": "Independent_174_2", "Independent_174_3": "Independent_174_3", "Independent_175_1": "Independent_175_1", "Independent_175_2": "Independent_175_2", "Independent_175_3": "Independent_175_3", "Independent_176_1": "Independent_176_1", "Independent_176_2": "Independent_176_2", "Independent_176_3": "Independent_176_3", "Independent_176_4": "Independent_176_4", "Independent_176_5": "Independent_176_5", "Independent_176_6": "Independent_176_6", "Independent_176_7": "Independent_176_7", "Independent_177_1": "Independent_177_1", "Independent_177_2": "Independent_177_2", "Independent_178_1": "Independent_178_1", "Independent_178_2": "Independent_178_2", "Independent_178_3": "Independent_178_3", "Independent_178_4": "Independent_178_4", "Independent_178_5": "Independent_178_5", "Independent_178_6": "Independent_178_6", "Independent_178_7": "Independent_178_7", "Independent_179_1": "Independent_179_1", "Independent_179_2": "Independent_179_2", "Independent_179_3": "Independent_179_3", "Independent_179_4": "Independent_179_4", "Independent_179_5": "Independent_179_5", "Independent_180_1": "Independent_180_1", "Independent_181_1": "Independent_181_1", "Independent_181_2": "Independent_181_2", "Independent_181_3": "Independent_181_3", "Independent_181_4": "Independent_181_4", "Independent_181_5": "Independent_181_5", "Independent_181_6": "Independent_181_6", "Independent_181_7": "Independent_181_7", "Independent_181_8": "Independent_181_8", "Independent_182_1": "Independent_182_1", "Independent_182_2": "Independent_182_2", "Independent_182_3": "Independent_182_3", "Independent_182_4": "Independent_182_4", "Independent_182_5": "Independent_182_5", "Independent_182_6": "Independent_182_6", "Independent_182_7": "Independent_182_7", "Independent_182_8": "Independent_182_8", "Independent_182_9": "Independent_182_9", "Independent_183_1": "Independent_183_1", "Independent_183_2": "Independent_183_2", "Independent_183_3": "Independent_183_3", "Independent_183_4": "Independent_183_4", "Independent_183_5": "Independent_183_5", "Independent_184_1": "Independent_184_1", "Independent_184_2": "Independent_184_2", "Independent_184_3": "Independent_184_3", "Independent_184_4": "Independent_184_4", "Independent_184_5": "Independent_184_5", "Independent_184_6": "Independent_184_6", "Independent_185_1": "Independent_185_1", "Independent_185_2": "Independent_185_2", "Independent_185_3": "Independent_185_3", "Independent_185_4": "Independent_185_4", "Independent_185_5": "Independent_185_5", "Independent_186_1": "Independent_186_1", "Independent_186_2": "Independent_186_2", "Independent_186_3": "Independent_186_3", "Independent_187_1": "Independent_187_1", "Independent_187_2": "Independent_187_2", "Independent_187_3": "Independent_187_3", "Independent_187_4": "Independent_187_4", "Independent_187_5": "Independent_187_5", "Independent_187_6": "Independent_187_6", "Independent_188_1": "Independent_188_1", "Independent_188_2": "Independent_188_2", "Independent_188_3": "Independent_188_3", "Independent_188_4": "Independent_188_4", "Independent_188_5": "Independent_188_5", "Independent_188_6": "Independent_188_6", "Independent_189_1": "Independent_189_1", "Independent_189_2": "Independent_189_2", "Independent_189_3": "Independent_189_3", "Independent_189_4": "Independent_189_4", "Independent_189_5": "Independent_189_5", "Independent_189_6": "Independent_189_6", "Independent_189_7": "Independent_189_7", "Independent_189_8": "Independent_189_8", "Independent_189_9": "Independent_189_9", "Independent_189_10": "Independent_189_10", "SJKP": "SJKP", "Independent_189_11": "Independent_189_11", "Independent_190_1": "Independent_190_1", "Independent_190_2": "Independent_190_2", "Independent_190_3": "Independent_190_3", "Independent_190_4": "Independent_190_4", "Independent_190_5": "Independent_190_5", "Independent_191_1": "Independent_191_1", "Independent_191_2": "Independent_191_2", "Independent_191_3": "Independent_191_3", "Independent_191_4": "Independent_191_4", "AKBRP": "AKBRP", "Independent_192_1": "Independent_192_1", "Independent_192_2": "Independent_192_2", "Independent_192_3": "Independent_192_3", "Independent_192_4": "Independent_192_4", "Independent_193_1": "Independent_193_1", "Independent_193_2": "Independent_193_2", "Independent_193_3": "Independent_193_3", "Independent_194_1": "Independent_194_1", "Independent_194_2": "Independent_194_2", "Independent_195_1": "Independent_195_1", "Independent_195_2": "Independent_195_2", "Independent_195_3": "Independent_195_3", "Independent_196_1": "Independent_196_1", "Independent_196_2": "Independent_196_2", "Independent_196_3": "Independent_196_3", "Independent_196_4": "Independent_196_4", "Independent_196_5": "Independent_196_5", "Independent_197_1": "Independent_197_1", "Independent_197_2": "Independent_197_2", "Independent_197_3": "Independent_197_3", "Independent_198_1": "Independent_198_1", "Independent_198_2": "Independent_198_2", "Independent_198_3": "Independent_198_3", "Independent_198_4": "Independent_198_4", "Independent_199_1": "Independent_199_1", "Independent_199_2": "Independent_199_2", "Independent_199_3": "Independent_199_3", "Independent_199_4": "Independent_199_4", "Independent_201_1": "Independent_201_1", "Independent_202_1": "Independent_202_1", "Independent_202_2": "Independent_202_2", "Independent_202_3": "Independent_202_3", "Independent_203_1": "Independent_203_1", "Independent_203_2": "Independent_203_2", "Independent_203_3": "Independent_203_3", "Independent_203_4": "Independent_203_4", "Independent_203_5": "Independent_203_5", "Independent_204_1": "Independent_204_1", "Independent_204_2": "Independent_204_2", "Independent_204_3": "Independent_204_3", "Independent_204_4": "Independent_204_4", "Independent_204_5": "Independent_204_5", "Independent_204_6": "Independent_204_6", "Independent_204_7": "Independent_204_7", "Independent_204_8": "Independent_204_8", "Independent_206_1": "Independent_206_1", "Independent_207_1": "Independent_207_1", "Independent_207_2": "Independent_207_2", "Independent_207_3": "Independent_207_3", "Independent_207_4": "Independent_207_4", "Independent_208_1": "Independent_208_1", "Independent_208_2": "Independent_208_2", "Independent_208_3": "Independent_208_3", "Independent_208_4": "Independent_208_4", "Independent_208_5": "Independent_208_5", "Independent_208_6": "Independent_208_6", "Independent_208_7": "Independent_208_7", "Independent_209_1": "Independent_209_1", "Independent_209_2": "Independent_209_2", "Independent_209_3": "Independent_209_3", "Independent_210_1": "Independent_210_1", "Independent_211_1": "Independent_211_1", "Independent_212_1": "Independent_212_1", "Independent_212_2": "Independent_212_2", "DPPS": "DPPS", "Independent_212_3": "Independent_212_3", "Independent_212_4": "Independent_212_4", "Independent_212_5": "Independent_212_5", "Independent_212_6": "Independent_212_6", "Independent_212_7": "Independent_212_7", "Independent_214_1": "Independent_214_1", "Independent_214_2": "Independent_214_2", "Independent_214_3": "Independent_214_3", "Independent_214_4": "Independent_214_4", "Independent_215_1": "Independent_215_1", "Independent_215_2": "Independent_215_2", "Independent_215_3": "Independent_215_3", "Independent_215_4": "Independent_215_4", "Independent_215_5": "Independent_215_5", "Independent_216_1": "Independent_216_1", "Independent_216_2": "Independent_216_2", "Independent_216_3": "Independent_216_3", "Independent_216_4": "Independent_216_4", "Independent_216_5": "Independent_216_5", "Independent_216_6": "Independent_216_6", "Independent_216_7": "Independent_216_7", "Independent_216_8": "Independent_216_8", "Independent_216_9": "Independent_216_9", "Independent_216_10": "Independent_216_10", "Independent_217_1": "Independent_217_1", "Independent_217_2": "Independent_217_2", "Independent_217_3": "Independent_217_3", "Independent_217_4": "Independent_217_4", "Independent_217_5": "Independent_217_5", "Independent_217_6": "Independent_217_6", "Independent_217_7": "Independent_217_7", "Independent_217_8": "Independent_217_8", "Independent_217_9": "Independent_217_9", "Independent_218_1": "Independent_218_1", "Independent_218_2": "Independent_218_2", "Independent_218_3": "Independent_218_3", "Independent_218_4": "Independent_218_4", "Independent_218_5": "Independent_218_5", "Independent_218_6": "Independent_218_6", "Independent_219_1": "Independent_219_1", "Independent_219_2": "Independent_219_2", "Independent_219_3": "Independent_219_3", "Independent_219_4": "Independent_219_4", "Independent_219_5": "Independent_219_5", "Independent_219_6": "Independent_219_6", "Independent_219_7": "Independent_219_7", "Independent_219_8": "Independent_219_8", "Independent_219_9": "Independent_219_9", "Independent_219_10": "Independent_219_10", "Independent_219_11": "Independent_219_11", "Independent_219_12": "Independent_219_12", "Independent_219_13": "Independent_219_13", "Independent_219_14": "Independent_219_14", "ABHM": "ABHM", "Independent_219_15": "Independent_219_15", "Independent_220_1": "Independent_220_1", "Independent_220_2": "Independent_220_2", "Independent_220_3": "Independent_220_3", "Independent_220_4": "Independent_220_4", "Independent_220_5": "Independent_220_5", "Independent_220_6": "Independent_220_6", "Independent_220_7": "Independent_220_7", "Independent_220_8": "Independent_220_8", "Independent_221_1": "Independent_221_1", "Independent_221_2": "Independent_221_2", "Independent_221_3": "Independent_221_3", "Independent_221_4": "Independent_221_4", "Independent_221_5": "Independent_221_5", "Independent_222_1": "Independent_222_1", "Independent_222_2": "Independent_222_2", "Independent_222_3": "Independent_222_3", "Independent_223_1": "Independent_223_1", "Independent_223_2": "Independent_223_2", "Independent_223_3": "Independent_223_3", "Independent_223_4": "Independent_223_4", "Independent_223_5": "Independent_223_5", "Independent_224_1": "Independent_224_1", "Independent_224_2": "Independent_224_2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 224, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 224, "registered_not_positive": 224}, "n_stations_flagged": 224, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:52:18.953538", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.646, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.666, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.65, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.522, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.275, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.65, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.522, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.522, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.407, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.407, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.582, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 224}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cf03cd891764465c9cf682144b16beff", "name": "India 2013 local (overnight india-rajasthan-2013-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2013, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Rajasthan/Rajasthan_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"party_BJP": "party_BJP", "party_INC": "party_INC", "party_NUZP": "party_NUZP", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "party_CPM": "party_CPM", "party_NOTA": "party_NOTA", "party_BSP": "party_BSP", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "party_BHBP": "party_BHBP", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "party_JGP": "party_JGP", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "Independent_2_3": "Independent_2_3", "Independent_2_4": "Independent_2_4", "Independent_2_5": "Independent_2_5", "Independent_2_6": "Independent_2_6", "Independent_2_7": "Independent_2_7", "party_RJVP": "party_RJVP", "Independent_2_8": "Independent_2_8", "Independent_2_9": "Independent_2_9", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "party_NPEP": "party_NPEP", "Independent_3_3": "Independent_3_3", "Independent_3_4": "Independent_3_4", "party_HJP": "party_HJP", "party_MEDP": "party_MEDP", "party_CPI": "party_CPI", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "party_NCP": "party_NCP", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "party_SHS": "party_SHS", "Independent_4_4": "Independent_4_4", "Independent_4_5": "Independent_4_5", "Independent_4_6": "Independent_4_6", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "party_BA_S_D": "party_BA_S_D", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "Independent_7_2": "Independent_7_2", "party_BHSMP": "party_BHSMP", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "Independent_8_3": "Independent_8_3", "Independent_8_4": "Independent_8_4", "Independent_8_5": "Independent_8_5", "party_BHPJP": "party_BHPJP", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "party_NLP": "party_NLP", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "Independent_11_3": "Independent_11_3", "Independent_11_4": "Independent_11_4", "Independent_11_5": "Independent_11_5", "Independent_11_6": "Independent_11_6", "party_RLD": "party_RLD", "party_BNNP": "party_BNNP", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "party_KMPP": "party_KMPP", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "Independent_13_3": "Independent_13_3", "Independent_13_4": "Independent_13_4", "Independent_13_5": "Independent_13_5", "Independent_13_6": "Independent_13_6", "party_LJP": "party_LJP", "Independent_13_7": "Independent_13_7", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "Independent_14_3": "Independent_14_3", "Independent_14_4": "Independent_14_4", "Independent_14_5": "Independent_14_5", "party_SP": "party_SP", "Independent_14_6": "Independent_14_6", "Independent_14_7": "Independent_14_7", "Independent_14_8": "Independent_14_8", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_15_2": "Independent_15_2", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "party_SMBHP": "party_SMBHP", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "Independent_17_3": "Independent_17_3", "Independent_17_4": "Independent_17_4", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_18_3": "Independent_18_3", "Independent_18_4": "Independent_18_4", "Independent_18_5": "Independent_18_5", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "Independent_19_3": "Independent_19_3", "Independent_19_4": "Independent_19_4", "Independent_19_5": "Independent_19_5", "Independent_19_6": "Independent_19_6", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_20_2": "Independent_20_2", "party_BYS": "party_BYS", "party_LD": "party_LD", "party_BRPP": "party_BRPP", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_22_2": "Independent_22_2", "Independent_22_3": "Independent_22_3", "Independent_22_4": "Independent_22_4", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_23_2": "Independent_23_2", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "party_SUCI": "party_SUCI", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "Independent_26_3": "Independent_26_3", "party_CPI_ML_L": "party_CPI_ML_L", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "party_JD_U": "party_JD_U", "Independent_27_3": "Independent_27_3", "party_WPOI": "party_WPOI", "party_IPGP": "party_IPGP", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "Independent_29_4": "Independent_29_4", "Independent_29_5": "Independent_29_5", "Independent_29_6": "Independent_29_6", "Independent_29_7": "Independent_29_7", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "Independent_30_3": "Independent_30_3", "Independent_30_4": "Independent_30_4", "Independent_30_5": "Independent_30_5", "Independent_30_6": "Independent_30_6", "Independent_30_7": "Independent_30_7", "Independent_30_8": "Independent_30_8", "Independent_30_9": "Independent_30_9", "party_AKBAP": "party_AKBAP", "Independent_30_10": "Independent_30_10", "Independent_30_11": "Independent_30_11", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_31_2": "Independent_31_2", "party_JKNPP": "party_JKNPP", "Independent_31_3": "Independent_31_3", "Independent_31_4": "Independent_31_4", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "party_VIP": "party_VIP", "Independent_33_4": "Independent_33_4", "Independent_33_5": "Independent_33_5", "Independent_33_6": "Independent_33_6", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_34_3": "Independent_34_3", "Independent_34_4": "Independent_34_4", "Independent_34_5": "Independent_34_5", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "Independent_35_2": "Independent_35_2", "Independent_35_3": "Independent_35_3", "Independent_35_4": "Independent_35_4", "Independent_35_5": "Independent_35_5", "Independent_35_6": "Independent_35_6", "Independent_35_7": "Independent_35_7", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_36_3": "Independent_36_3", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "Independent_37_3": "Independent_37_3", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_38_3": "Independent_38_3", "Independent_38_4": "Independent_38_4", "Independent_38_5": "Independent_38_5", "Independent_38_6": "Independent_38_6", "party_JD_S": "party_JD_S", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_39_2": "Independent_39_2", "Independent_39_3": "Independent_39_3", "Independent_39_4": "Independent_39_4", "Independent_39_5": "Independent_39_5", "Independent_39_6": "Independent_39_6", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_40_3": "Independent_40_3", "Independent_40_4": "Independent_40_4", "Independent_40_5": "Independent_40_5", "Independent_40_6": "Independent_40_6", "Independent_40_7": "Independent_40_7", "Independent_40_8": "Independent_40_8", "Independent_40_9": "Independent_40_9", "Independent_40_10": "Independent_40_10", "Independent_40_11": "Independent_40_11", "Independent_40_12": "Independent_40_12", "Independent_40_13": "Independent_40_13", "Independent_40_14": "Independent_40_14", "Independent_40_15": "Independent_40_15", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "Independent_41_3": "Independent_41_3", "Independent_41_4": "Independent_41_4", "Independent_41_5": "Independent_41_5", "Independent_41_6": "Independent_41_6", "Independent_41_7": "Independent_41_7", "Independent_41_8": "Independent_41_8", "Independent_41_9": "Independent_41_9", "Independent_41_10": "Independent_41_10", "Independent_41_11": "Independent_41_11", "Independent_41_12": "Independent_41_12", "Independent_41_13": "Independent_41_13", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_43_2": "Independent_43_2", "Independent_43_3": "Independent_43_3", "Independent_43_4": "Independent_43_4", "Independent_43_5": "Independent_43_5", "Independent_43_6": "Independent_43_6", "Independent_43_7": "Independent_43_7", "Independent_43_8": "Independent_43_8", "Independent_43_9": "Independent_43_9", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_45_2": "Independent_45_2", "Independent_45_3": "Independent_45_3", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "Independent_46_3": "Independent_46_3", "Independent_46_4": "Independent_46_4", "Independent_46_5": "Independent_46_5", "Independent_46_6": "Independent_46_6", "Independent_46_7": "Independent_46_7", "Independent_46_8": "Independent_46_8", "Independent_46_9": "Independent_46_9", "Independent_46_10": "Independent_46_10", "Independent_46_11": "Independent_46_11", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "Independent_47_3": "Independent_47_3", "Independent_47_4": "Independent_47_4", "Independent_47_5": "Independent_47_5", "Independent_47_6": "Independent_47_6", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_48_2": "Independent_48_2", "Independent_48_3": "Independent_48_3", "Independent_48_4": "Independent_48_4", "Independent_48_5": "Independent_48_5", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "Independent_49_3": "Independent_49_3", "Independent_49_4": "Independent_49_4", "Independent_49_5": "Independent_49_5", "Independent_49_6": "Independent_49_6", "Independent_49_7": "Independent_49_7", "Independent_49_8": "Independent_49_8", "Independent_49_9": "Independent_49_9", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_50_3": "Independent_50_3", "Independent_50_4": "Independent_50_4", "Independent_50_5": "Independent_50_5", "Independent_50_6": "Independent_50_6", "party_RPI_A": "party_RPI_A", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_51_3": "Independent_51_3", "Independent_51_4": "Independent_51_4", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "Independent_52_3": "Independent_52_3", "Independent_52_4": "Independent_52_4", "Independent_52_5": "Independent_52_5", "Independent_52_6": "Independent_52_6", "Independent_52_7": "Independent_52_7", "Independent_52_8": "Independent_52_8", "Independent_52_9": "Independent_52_9", "party_AIFB": "party_AIFB", "Independent_52_10": "Independent_52_10", "Independent_52_11": "Independent_52_11", "Independent_52_12": "Independent_52_12", "Independent_52_13": "Independent_52_13", "Independent_52_14": "Independent_52_14", "Independent_52_15": "Independent_52_15", "Independent_52_16": "Independent_52_16", "Independent_52_17": "Independent_52_17", "Independent_52_18": "Independent_52_18", "Independent_52_19": "Independent_52_19", "party_AAP": "party_AAP", "Independent_52_20": "Independent_52_20", "Independent_52_21": "Independent_52_21", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "Independent_53_2": "Independent_53_2", "Independent_53_3": "Independent_53_3", "Independent_53_4": "Independent_53_4", "Independent_53_5": "Independent_53_5", "Independent_53_6": "Independent_53_6", "Independent_53_7": "Independent_53_7", "Independent_53_8": "Independent_53_8", "Independent_53_9": "Independent_53_9", "Independent_53_10": "Independent_53_10", "Independent_53_11": "Independent_53_11", "Independent_53_12": "Independent_53_12", "Independent_53_13": "Independent_53_13", "Independent_53_14": "Independent_53_14", "party_BRSP": "party_BRSP", "Independent_53_15": "Independent_53_15", "Independent_53_16": "Independent_53_16", "Independent_53_17": "Independent_53_17", "Independent_53_18": "Independent_53_18", "Independent_53_19": "Independent_53_19", "Independent_53_20": "Independent_53_20", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_54_3": "Independent_54_3", "Independent_54_4": "Independent_54_4", "Independent_54_5": "Independent_54_5", "Independent_54_6": "Independent_54_6", "Independent_54_7": "Independent_54_7", "Independent_54_8": "Independent_54_8", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_55_2": "Independent_55_2", "Independent_55_3": "Independent_55_3", "party_RBD": "party_RBD", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_57_2": "Independent_57_2", "Independent_57_3": "Independent_57_3", "Independent_57_4": "Independent_57_4", "Independent_57_5": "Independent_57_5", "Independent_57_6": "Independent_57_6", "Independent_57_7": "Independent_57_7", "Independent_57_8": "Independent_57_8", "Independent_58_1": "Independent_58_1", "Independent_58_2": "Independent_58_2", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_59_2": "Independent_59_2", "Independent_59_3": "Independent_59_3", "Independent_59_4": "Independent_59_4", "Independent_59_5": "Independent_59_5", "Independent_59_6": "Independent_59_6", "Independent_59_7": "Independent_59_7", "Independent_59_8": "Independent_59_8", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "Independent_61_3": "Independent_61_3", "Independent_61_4": "Independent_61_4", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_62_3": "Independent_62_3", "Independent_62_4": "Independent_62_4", "Independent_62_5": "Independent_62_5", "Independent_62_6": "Independent_62_6", "Independent_62_7": "Independent_62_7", "Independent_62_8": "Independent_62_8", "Independent_62_9": "Independent_62_9", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "Independent_63_3": "Independent_63_3", "Independent_63_4": "Independent_63_4", "Independent_63_5": "Independent_63_5", "Independent_63_6": "Independent_63_6", "Independent_63_7": "Independent_63_7", "party_ASP": "party_ASP", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_64_2": "Independent_64_2", "Independent_64_3": "Independent_64_3", "Independent_64_4": "Independent_64_4", "Independent_64_5": "Independent_64_5", "Independent_64_6": "Independent_64_6", "Independent_64_7": "Independent_64_7", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_65_2": "Independent_65_2", "Independent_65_3": "Independent_65_3", "party_RJNSP": "party_RJNSP", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_66_2": "Independent_66_2", "Independent_66_3": "Independent_66_3", "Independent_66_4": "Independent_66_4", "Independent_66_5": "Independent_66_5", "Independent_66_6": "Independent_66_6", "Independent_67_1": "Independent_67_1", "Independent_67_2": "Independent_67_2", "Independent_67_3": "Independent_67_3", "Independent_67_4": "Independent_67_4", "Independent_67_5": "Independent_67_5", "Independent_67_6": "Independent_67_6", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "Independent_68_3": "Independent_68_3", "Independent_68_4": "Independent_68_4", "Independent_68_5": "Independent_68_5", "Independent_68_6": "Independent_68_6", "Independent_68_7": "Independent_68_7", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_69_3": "Independent_69_3", "Independent_69_4": "Independent_69_4", "Independent_69_5": "Independent_69_5", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "Independent_70_2": "Independent_70_2", "Independent_70_3": "Independent_70_3", "Independent_70_4": "Independent_70_4", "party_SDPI": "party_SDPI", "Independent_70_5": "Independent_70_5", "Independent_70_6": "Independent_70_6", "Independent_70_7": "Independent_70_7", "Independent_70_8": "Independent_70_8", "party_TOP": "party_TOP", "Independent_71_1": "Independent_71_1", "Independent_71_2": "Independent_71_2", "Independent_71_3": "Independent_71_3", "Independent_71_4": "Independent_71_4", "Independent_71_5": "Independent_71_5", "Independent_71_6": "Independent_71_6", "Independent_71_7": "Independent_71_7", "Independent_71_8": "Independent_71_8", "Independent_71_9": "Independent_71_9", "Independent_71_10": "Independent_71_10", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_72_2": "Independent_72_2", "Independent_72_3": "Independent_72_3", "Independent_72_4": "Independent_72_4", "party_BSDL": "party_BSDL", "Independent_72_5": "Independent_72_5", "party_JBSP": "party_JBSP", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "Independent_73_3": "Independent_73_3", "Independent_73_4": "Independent_73_4", "Independent_73_5": "Independent_73_5", "Independent_73_6": "Independent_73_6", "Independent_73_7": "Independent_73_7", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_74_2": "Independent_74_2", "Independent_74_3": "Independent_74_3", "Independent_74_4": "Independent_74_4", "Independent_74_5": "Independent_74_5", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_75_2": "Independent_75_2", "party_IVD": "party_IVD", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_76_3": "Independent_76_3", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_78_2": "Independent_78_2", "Independent_79_1": "Independent_79_1", "Independent_79_2": "Independent_79_2", "Independent_79_3": "Independent_79_3", "Independent_79_4": "Independent_79_4", "Independent_79_5": "Independent_79_5", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_80_2": "Independent_80_2", "party_RSMD": "party_RSMD", "Independent_80_3": "Independent_80_3", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "party_BHJD": "party_BHJD", "Independent_82_1": "Independent_82_1", "Independent_82_2": "Independent_82_2", "Independent_82_3": "Independent_82_3", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_83_2": "Independent_83_2", "Independent_83_3": "Independent_83_3", "Independent_83_4": "Independent_83_4", "Independent_85_1": "Independent_85_1", "Independent_85_2": "Independent_85_2", "Independent_85_3": "Independent_85_3", "Independent_85_4": "Independent_85_4", "Independent_85_5": "Independent_85_5", "Independent_85_6": "Independent_85_6", "Independent_86_1": "Independent_86_1", "Independent_86_2": "Independent_86_2", "Independent_87_1": "Independent_87_1", "Independent_87_2": "Independent_87_2", "Independent_88_1": "Independent_88_1", "party_SP_I": "party_SP_I", "Independent_88_2": "Independent_88_2", "Independent_88_3": "Independent_88_3", "Independent_88_4": "Independent_88_4", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_89_2": "Independent_89_2", "Independent_90_1": "Independent_90_1", "Independent_90_2": "Independent_90_2", "Independent_90_3": "Independent_90_3", "Independent_90_4": "Independent_90_4", "Independent_90_5": "Independent_90_5", "Independent_91_1": "Independent_91_1", "Independent_91_2": "Independent_91_2", "Independent_91_3": "Independent_91_3", "party_NYP": "party_NYP", "Independent_92_1": "Independent_92_1", "Independent_92_2": "Independent_92_2", "Independent_92_3": "Independent_92_3", "Independent_92_4": "Independent_92_4", "Independent_93_1": "Independent_93_1", "Independent_93_2": "Independent_93_2", "Independent_93_3": "Independent_93_3", "Independent_94_1": "Independent_94_1", "Independent_94_2": "Independent_94_2", "Independent_94_3": "Independent_94_3", "Independent_96_1": "Independent_96_1", "Independent_96_2": "Independent_96_2", "Independent_98_1": "Independent_98_1", "Independent_98_2": "Independent_98_2", "Independent_98_3": "Independent_98_3", "Independent_98_4": "Independent_98_4", "Independent_98_5": "Independent_98_5", "Independent_99_1": "Independent_99_1", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_100_2": "Independent_100_2", "Independent_100_3": "Independent_100_3", "Independent_100_4": "Independent_100_4", "Independent_100_5": "Independent_100_5", "Independent_100_6": "Independent_100_6", "Independent_101_1": "Independent_101_1", "Independent_101_2": "Independent_101_2", "Independent_102_1": "Independent_102_1", "Independent_102_2": "Independent_102_2", "Independent_102_3": "Independent_102_3", "Independent_102_4": "Independent_102_4", "Independent_102_5": "Independent_102_5", "Independent_102_6": "Independent_102_6", "Independent_102_7": "Independent_102_7", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_103_2": "Independent_103_2", "Independent_103_3": "Independent_103_3", "Independent_104_1": "Independent_104_1", "Independent_104_2": "Independent_104_2", "Independent_104_3": "Independent_104_3", "Independent_104_4": "Independent_104_4", "Independent_104_5": "Independent_104_5", "Independent_104_6": "Independent_104_6", "Independent_104_7": "Independent_104_7", "Independent_104_8": "Independent_104_8", "Independent_104_9": "Independent_104_9", "Independent_105_1": "Independent_105_1", "Independent_105_2": "Independent_105_2", "Independent_106_1": "Independent_106_1", "Independent_106_2": "Independent_106_2", "Independent_106_3": "Independent_106_3", "Independent_106_4": "Independent_106_4", "Independent_107_1": "Independent_107_1", "Independent_107_2": "Independent_107_2", "Independent_107_3": "Independent_107_3", "Independent_107_4": "Independent_107_4", "Independent_107_5": "Independent_107_5", "Independent_107_6": "Independent_107_6", "Independent_109_1": "Independent_109_1", "Independent_109_2": "Independent_109_2", "Independent_109_3": "Independent_109_3", "Independent_109_4": "Independent_109_4", "Independent_109_5": "Independent_109_5", "Independent_110_1": "Independent_110_1", "Independent_110_2": "Independent_110_2", "Independent_110_3": "Independent_110_3", "Independent_110_4": "Independent_110_4", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "Independent_111_2": "Independent_111_2", "Independent_111_3": "Independent_111_3", "party_ABHM": "party_ABHM", "Independent_112_1": "Independent_112_1", "Independent_113_1": "Independent_113_1", "Independent_113_2": "Independent_113_2", "Independent_113_3": "Independent_113_3", "Independent_113_4": "Independent_113_4", "Independent_113_5": "Independent_113_5", "Independent_114_1": "Independent_114_1", "Independent_114_2": "Independent_114_2", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_115_2": "Independent_115_2", "Independent_115_3": "Independent_115_3", "Independent_115_4": "Independent_115_4", "Independent_115_5": "Independent_115_5", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "Independent_116_2": "Independent_116_2", "Independent_116_3": "Independent_116_3", "Independent_116_4": "Independent_116_4", "Independent_116_5": "Independent_116_5", "Independent_116_6": "Independent_116_6", "Independent_116_7": "Independent_116_7", "Independent_116_8": "Independent_116_8", "Independent_116_9": "Independent_116_9", "Independent_116_10": "Independent_116_10", "Independent_116_11": "Independent_116_11", "Independent_116_12": "Independent_116_12", "Independent_116_13": "Independent_116_13", "Independent_117_1": "Independent_117_1", "Independent_119_1": "Independent_119_1", "Independent_119_2": "Independent_119_2", "Independent_119_3": "Independent_119_3", "Independent_119_4": "Independent_119_4", "Independent_119_5": "Independent_119_5", "Independent_120_1": "Independent_120_1", "Independent_121_1": "Independent_121_1", "Independent_121_2": "Independent_121_2", "Independent_121_3": "Independent_121_3", "Independent_121_4": "Independent_121_4", "Independent_122_1": "Independent_122_1", "Independent_122_2": "Independent_122_2", "Independent_122_3": "Independent_122_3", "Independent_122_4": "Independent_122_4", "Independent_122_5": "Independent_122_5", "Independent_123_1": "Independent_123_1", "Independent_124_1": "Independent_124_1", "Independent_124_2": "Independent_124_2", "Independent_125_1": "Independent_125_1", "Independent_125_2": "Independent_125_2", "Independent_125_3": "Independent_125_3", "Independent_126_1": "Independent_126_1", "Independent_126_2": "Independent_126_2", "Independent_126_3": "Independent_126_3", "Independent_127_1": "Independent_127_1", "Independent_127_2": "Independent_127_2", "Independent_127_3": "Independent_127_3", "Independent_127_4": "Independent_127_4", "Independent_127_5": "Independent_127_5", "Independent_128_1": "Independent_128_1", "Independent_128_2": "Independent_128_2", "Independent_128_3": "Independent_128_3", "Independent_128_4": "Independent_128_4", "Independent_128_5": "Independent_128_5", "Independent_128_6": "Independent_128_6", "Independent_128_7": "Independent_128_7", "Independent_128_8": "Independent_128_8", "Independent_129_1": "Independent_129_1", "Independent_129_2": "Independent_129_2", "Independent_129_3": "Independent_129_3", "Independent_129_4": "Independent_129_4", "Independent_129_5": "Independent_129_5", "Independent_129_6": "Independent_129_6", "Independent_129_7": "Independent_129_7", "Independent_129_8": "Independent_129_8", "Independent_130_1": "Independent_130_1", "Independent_130_2": "Independent_130_2", "Independent_130_3": "Independent_130_3", "Independent_130_4": "Independent_130_4", "Independent_132_1": "Independent_132_1", "Independent_133_1": "Independent_133_1", "Independent_133_2": "Independent_133_2", "Independent_134_1": "Independent_134_1", "Independent_135_1": "Independent_135_1", "Independent_135_2": "Independent_135_2", "Independent_135_3": "Independent_135_3", "Independent_135_4": "Independent_135_4", "Independent_135_5": "Independent_135_5", "Independent_135_6": "Independent_135_6", "Independent_137_1": "Independent_137_1", "Independent_137_2": "Independent_137_2", "Independent_137_3": "Independent_137_3", "Independent_137_4": "Independent_137_4", "Independent_137_5": "Independent_137_5", "Independent_137_6": "Independent_137_6", "Independent_138_1": "Independent_138_1", "Independent_138_2": "Independent_138_2", "Independent_139_1": "Independent_139_1", "Independent_140_1": "Independent_140_1", "Independent_141_1": "Independent_141_1", "Independent_141_2": "Independent_141_2", "Independent_141_3": "Independent_141_3", "Independent_141_4": "Independent_141_4", "Independent_141_5": "Independent_141_5", "Independent_141_6": "Independent_141_6", "Independent_141_7": "Independent_141_7", "Independent_141_8": "Independent_141_8", "Independent_141_9": "Independent_141_9", "Independent_141_10": "Independent_141_10", "Independent_141_11": "Independent_141_11", "Independent_141_12": "Independent_141_12", "Independent_142_1": "Independent_142_1", "Independent_142_2": "Independent_142_2", "Independent_143_1": "Independent_143_1", "Independent_143_2": "Independent_143_2", "Independent_143_3": "Independent_143_3", "Independent_143_4": "Independent_143_4", "Independent_143_5": "Independent_143_5", "Independent_143_6": "Independent_143_6", "Independent_143_7": "Independent_143_7", "party_IJP": "party_IJP", "Independent_145_1": "Independent_145_1", "Independent_146_1": "Independent_146_1", "Independent_146_2": "Independent_146_2", "Independent_146_3": "Independent_146_3", "Independent_146_4": "Independent_146_4", "Independent_146_5": "Independent_146_5", "Independent_146_6": "Independent_146_6", "Independent_146_7": "Independent_146_7", "Independent_146_8": "Independent_146_8", "Independent_147_1": "Independent_147_1", "Independent_147_2": "Independent_147_2", "Independent_148_1": "Independent_148_1", "Independent_148_2": "Independent_148_2", "Independent_148_3": "Independent_148_3", "Independent_148_4": "Independent_148_4", "Independent_150_1": "Independent_150_1", "Independent_151_1": "Independent_151_1", "Independent_152_1": "Independent_152_1", "Independent_153_1": "Independent_153_1", "Independent_153_2": "Independent_153_2", "Independent_153_3": "Independent_153_3", "Independent_153_4": "Independent_153_4", "Independent_154_1": "Independent_154_1", "Independent_155_1": "Independent_155_1", "Independent_157_1": "Independent_157_1", "Independent_158_1": "Independent_158_1", "Independent_158_2": "Independent_158_2", "Independent_160_1": "Independent_160_1", "Independent_162_1": "Independent_162_1", "Independent_163_1": "Independent_163_1", "Independent_163_2": "Independent_163_2", "Independent_164_1": "Independent_164_1", "Independent_167_1": "Independent_167_1", "Independent_167_2": "Independent_167_2", "Independent_167_3": "Independent_167_3", "Independent_167_4": "Independent_167_4", "party_ABCD_A": "party_ABCD_A", "Independent_168_1": "Independent_168_1", "Independent_168_2": "Independent_168_2", "Independent_168_3": "Independent_168_3", "Independent_168_4": "Independent_168_4", "Independent_168_5": "Independent_168_5", "Independent_169_1": "Independent_169_1", "Independent_169_2": "Independent_169_2", "Independent_169_3": "Independent_169_3", "Independent_169_4": "Independent_169_4", "Independent_170_1": "Independent_170_1", "Independent_170_2": "Independent_170_2", "Independent_170_3": "Independent_170_3", "Independent_170_4": "Independent_170_4", "Independent_171_1": "Independent_171_1", "Independent_171_2": "Independent_171_2", "Independent_171_3": "Independent_171_3", "Independent_171_4": "Independent_171_4", "Independent_172_1": "Independent_172_1", "Independent_173_1": "Independent_173_1", "Independent_173_2": "Independent_173_2", "Independent_173_3": "Independent_173_3", "Independent_173_4": "Independent_173_4", "Independent_173_5": "Independent_173_5", "Independent_173_6": "Independent_173_6", "Independent_174_1": "Independent_174_1", "Independent_174_2": "Independent_174_2", "Independent_174_3": "Independent_174_3", "Independent_176_1": "Independent_176_1", "Independent_176_2": "Independent_176_2", "Independent_176_3": "Independent_176_3", "Independent_177_1": "Independent_177_1", "Independent_177_2": "Independent_177_2", "Independent_177_3": "Independent_177_3", "Independent_177_4": "Independent_177_4", "Independent_177_5": "Independent_177_5", "Independent_177_6": "Independent_177_6", "Independent_178_1": "Independent_178_1", "Independent_178_2": "Independent_178_2", "Independent_178_3": "Independent_178_3", "Independent_178_4": "Independent_178_4", "Independent_178_5": "Independent_178_5", "Independent_179_1": "Independent_179_1", "Independent_179_2": "Independent_179_2", "Independent_179_3": "Independent_179_3", "Independent_180_1": "Independent_180_1", "Independent_180_2": "Independent_180_2", "party_IUML": "party_IUML", "Independent_181_1": "Independent_181_1", "Independent_182_1": "Independent_182_1", "Independent_182_2": "Independent_182_2", "Independent_182_3": "Independent_182_3", "Independent_182_4": "Independent_182_4", "Independent_182_5": "Independent_182_5", "Independent_183_1": "Independent_183_1", "Independent_184_1": "Independent_184_1", "Independent_184_2": "Independent_184_2", "Independent_184_3": "Independent_184_3", "Independent_186_1": "Independent_186_1", "Independent_187_1": "Independent_187_1", "Independent_187_2": "Independent_187_2", "Independent_188_1": "Independent_188_1", "Independent_188_2": "Independent_188_2", "Independent_189_1": "Independent_189_1", "Independent_189_2": "Independent_189_2", "Independent_190_1": "Independent_190_1", "Independent_190_2": "Independent_190_2", "Independent_190_3": "Independent_190_3", "Independent_190_4": "Independent_190_4", "Independent_190_5": "Independent_190_5", "Independent_191_1": "Independent_191_1", "Independent_191_2": "Independent_191_2", "Independent_191_3": "Independent_191_3", "Independent_191_4": "Independent_191_4", "Independent_192_1": "Independent_192_1", "Independent_192_2": "Independent_192_2", "Independent_192_3": "Independent_192_3", "Independent_192_4": "Independent_192_4", "Independent_192_5": "Independent_192_5", "Independent_193_1": "Independent_193_1", "Independent_193_2": "Independent_193_2", "Independent_193_3": "Independent_193_3", "Independent_194_1": "Independent_194_1", "Independent_194_2": "Independent_194_2", "Independent_194_3": "Independent_194_3", "Independent_196_1": "Independent_196_1", "Independent_196_2": "Independent_196_2", "Independent_197_1": "Independent_197_1", "Independent_198_1": "Independent_198_1", "Independent_198_2": "Independent_198_2", "Independent_198_3": "Independent_198_3", "Independent_199_1": "Independent_199_1", "Independent_199_2": "Independent_199_2", "Independent_200_1": "Independent_200_1", "Independent_200_2": "Independent_200_2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 200, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 200, "registered_not_positive": 200}, "n_stations_flagged": 200, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:52:10.570996", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.646, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.666, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.65, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.522, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.275, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.65, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.522, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.522, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.407, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.407, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.582, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 200}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0f9467719f7249eb946cd0997d88c42f", "name": "India 2012 local (overnight india_gujarat_2012_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2012, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Gujarat/Gujarat_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"INC": "INC", "BJP": "BJP", "GPP": "GPP", "Independent_ABDASA_1": "Independent_ABDASA_1", "BSP": "BSP", "LJP": "LJP", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "Independent_MANDVI_1": "Independent_MANDVI_1", "Independent_MANDVI_2": "Independent_MANDVI_2", "Independent_MANDVI_3": "Independent_MANDVI_3", "Independent_MANDVI_4": "Independent_MANDVI_4", "Independent_BHUJ_1": "Independent_BHUJ_1", "Independent_BHUJ_2": "Independent_BHUJ_2", "Independent_BHUJ_3": "Independent_BHUJ_3", "SP": "SP", "Independent_ANJAR_1": "Independent_ANJAR_1", "MaJP": "MaJP", "Independent_GANDHIDHAM_1": "Independent_GANDHIDHAM_1", "Independent_RAPAR_1": "Independent_RAPAR_1", "Independent_RAPAR_2": "Independent_RAPAR_2", "Independent_RAPAR_3": "Independent_RAPAR_3", "Independent_RAPAR_4": "Independent_RAPAR_4", "IJP": "IJP", "NCP": "NCP", "Independent_VAV_1": "Independent_VAV_1", "Independent_THARAD_1": "Independent_THARAD_1", "Independent_THARAD_2": "Independent_THARAD_2", "Independent_THARAD_3": "Independent_THARAD_3", "Independent_DHANERA_1": "Independent_DHANERA_1", "Independent_DANTA_1": "Independent_DANTA_1", "Independent_DANTA_2": "Independent_DANTA_2", "Independent_VADGAM_1": "Independent_VADGAM_1", "Independent_PALANPUR_1": "Independent_PALANPUR_1", "Independent_PALANPUR_2": "Independent_PALANPUR_2", "Independent_PALANPUR_3": "Independent_PALANPUR_3", "Independent_PALANPUR_4": "Independent_PALANPUR_4", "Independent_PALANPUR_5": "Independent_PALANPUR_5", "Independent_PALANPUR_6": "Independent_PALANPUR_6", "Independent_PALANPUR_7": "Independent_PALANPUR_7", "Independent_DEESA_1": "Independent_DEESA_1", "Independent_DEESA_2": "Independent_DEESA_2", "Independent_DEESA_3": "Independent_DEESA_3", "Independent_DEESA_4": "Independent_DEESA_4", "Independent_DEESA_5": "Independent_DEESA_5", "Independent_DEESA_6": "Independent_DEESA_6", "Independent_DEESA_7": "Independent_DEESA_7", "Independent_DEODAR_1": "Independent_DEODAR_1", "Independent_DEODAR_2": "Independent_DEODAR_2", "Independent_DEODAR_3": "Independent_DEODAR_3", "Independent_RADHANPUR_1": "Independent_RADHANPUR_1", "Independent_RADHANPUR_2": "Independent_RADHANPUR_2", "Independent_RADHANPUR_3": "Independent_RADHANPUR_3", "Independent_RADHANPUR_4": "Independent_RADHANPUR_4", "Independent_CHANASMA_1": "Independent_CHANASMA_1", "Independent_CHANASMA_2": "Independent_CHANASMA_2", "Independent_CHANASMA_3": "Independent_CHANASMA_3", "Independent_CHANASMA_4": "Independent_CHANASMA_4", "Independent_CHANASMA_5": "Independent_CHANASMA_5", "Independent_PATAN_1": "Independent_PATAN_1", "Independent_PATAN_2": "Independent_PATAN_2", "Independent_PATAN_3": "Independent_PATAN_3", "Independent_PATAN_4": "Independent_PATAN_4", "Independent_PATAN_5": "Independent_PATAN_5", "Independent_PATAN_6": "Independent_PATAN_6", "Independent_PATAN_7": "Independent_PATAN_7", "Independent_PATAN_8": "Independent_PATAN_8", "VHS": "VHS", "Independent_SIDHPUR_1": "Independent_SIDHPUR_1", "Independent_SIDHPUR_2": "Independent_SIDHPUR_2", "Independent_SIDHPUR_3": "Independent_SIDHPUR_3", "Independent_SIDHPUR_4": "Independent_SIDHPUR_4", "Independent_SIDHPUR_5": "Independent_SIDHPUR_5", "Independent_KHERALU_1": "Independent_KHERALU_1", "SVPP": "SVPP", "Independent_UNJHA_1": "Independent_UNJHA_1", "Independent_UNJHA_2": "Independent_UNJHA_2", "Independent_UNJHA_3": "Independent_UNJHA_3", "Independent_VISNAGAR_1": "Independent_VISNAGAR_1", "Independent_VISNAGAR_2": "Independent_VISNAGAR_2", "RLD": "RLD", "Independent_BECHARAJI_1": "Independent_BECHARAJI_1", "Independent_BECHARAJI_2": "Independent_BECHARAJI_2", "Independent_KADI_1": "Independent_KADI_1", "Independent_KADI_2": "Independent_KADI_2", "Independent_MEHSANA_1": "Independent_MEHSANA_1", "Independent_MEHSANA_2": "Independent_MEHSANA_2", "Independent_MEHSANA_3": "Independent_MEHSANA_3", "Independent_MEHSANA_4": "Independent_MEHSANA_4", "Independent_MEHSANA_5": "Independent_MEHSANA_5", "Independent_MEHSANA_6": "Independent_MEHSANA_6", "Independent_MEHSANA_7": "Independent_MEHSANA_7", "Independent_MEHSANA_8": "Independent_MEHSANA_8", "Independent_MEHSANA_9": "Independent_MEHSANA_9", "Independent_MEHSANA_10": "Independent_MEHSANA_10", "Independent_MEHSANA_11": "Independent_MEHSANA_11", "Independent_VIJAPUR_1": "Independent_VIJAPUR_1", "Independent_VIJAPUR_2": "Independent_VIJAPUR_2", "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_1": "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_1", "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_2": "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_2", "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_3": "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_3", "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_4": "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_4", "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_5": "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_5", "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_6": "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_6", "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_7": "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_7", "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_8": "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_8", "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_9": "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_9", "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_10": "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_10", "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_11": "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_11", "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_12": "Independent_HIMATNAGAR_12", "Independent_IDAR_1": "Independent_IDAR_1", "Independent_IDAR_2": "Independent_IDAR_2", "Independent_KHEDBRAHMA_1": "Independent_KHEDBRAHMA_1", "CPM": "CPM", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "BNJD": "BNJD", "Independent_BHILODA_1": "Independent_BHILODA_1", "Independent_BHILODA_2": "Independent_BHILODA_2", "Independent_MODASA_1": "Independent_MODASA_1", "Independent_BAYAD_1": "Independent_BAYAD_1", "Independent_BAYAD_2": "Independent_BAYAD_2", "Independent_BAYAD_3": "Independent_BAYAD_3", "Independent_PRANTIJ_1": "Independent_PRANTIJ_1", "Independent_PRANTIJ_2": "Independent_PRANTIJ_2", "LoRP": "LoRP", "BhJD": "BhJD", "Independent_DEHGAM_1": "Independent_DEHGAM_1", "Independent_DEHGAM_2": "Independent_DEHGAM_2", "PAP": "PAP", "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_SOUTH_1": "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_SOUTH_1", "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_SOUTH_2": "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_SOUTH_2", "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_NORTH_1": "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_NORTH_1", "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_NORTH_2": "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_NORTH_2", "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_NORTH_3": "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_NORTH_3", "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_NORTH_4": "Independent_GANDHINAGAR_NORTH_4", "Independent_MANSA_1": "Independent_MANSA_1", "Independent_MANSA_2": "Independent_MANSA_2", "Independent_MANSA_3": "Independent_MANSA_3", "Independent_KALOL_1": "Independent_KALOL_1", "Independent_KALOL_2": "Independent_KALOL_2", "Independent_KALOL_3": "Independent_KALOL_3", "Independent_KALOL_4": "Independent_KALOL_4", "Independent_KALOL_5": "Independent_KALOL_5", "Independent_KALOL_6": "Independent_KALOL_6", "Independent_KALOL_7": "Independent_KALOL_7", "Independent_KALOL_8": "Independent_KALOL_8", "Independent_KALOL_9": "Independent_KALOL_9", "Independent_KALOL_10": "Independent_KALOL_10", "Independent_VIRAMGAM_1": "Independent_VIRAMGAM_1", "Independent_SANAND_1": "Independent_SANAND_1", "Independent_SANAND_2": "Independent_SANAND_2", "Independent_SANAND_3": "Independent_SANAND_3", "Independent_SANAND_4": "Independent_SANAND_4", "Independent_GHATLODIA_1": "Independent_GHATLODIA_1", "Independent_GHATLODIA_2": "Independent_GHATLODIA_2", "Independent_GHATLODIA_3": "Independent_GHATLODIA_3", "Independent_GHATLODIA_4": "Independent_GHATLODIA_4", "Independent_GHATLODIA_5": "Independent_GHATLODIA_5", "Independent_VEJALPUR_1": "Independent_VEJALPUR_1", "Independent_VEJALPUR_2": "Independent_VEJALPUR_2", "Independent_VEJALPUR_3": "Independent_VEJALPUR_3", "Independent_VEJALPUR_4": "Independent_VEJALPUR_4", "SP(I)": "SP(I)", "Independent_VEJALPUR_5": "Independent_VEJALPUR_5", "Independent_VATVA_1": "Independent_VATVA_1", "Independent_VATVA_2": "Independent_VATVA_2", "Independent_VATVA_3": "Independent_VATVA_3", "Independent_VATVA_4": "Independent_VATVA_4", "Independent_VATVA_5": "Independent_VATVA_5", "Independent_VATVA_6": "Independent_VATVA_6", "Independent_VATVA_7": "Independent_VATVA_7", "Independent_VATVA_8": "Independent_VATVA_8", "SUCI": "SUCI", "Independent_NARANPURA_1": "Independent_NARANPURA_1", "Independent_NARANPURA_2": "Independent_NARANPURA_2", "Independent_NARANPURA_3": "Independent_NARANPURA_3", "Independent_NARANPURA_4": "Independent_NARANPURA_4", "Independent_NARANPURA_5": "Independent_NARANPURA_5", "Independent_NIKOL_1": "Independent_NIKOL_1", "Independent_NIKOL_2": "Independent_NIKOL_2", "Independent_NIKOL_3": "Independent_NIKOL_3", "Independent_NIKOL_4": "Independent_NIKOL_4", "Independent_NARODA_1": "Independent_NARODA_1", "Independent_NARODA_2": "Independent_NARODA_2", "Independent_THAKKARBAPA_NAGAR_1": "Independent_THAKKARBAPA_NAGAR_1", "CPI": "CPI", "Independent_THAKKARBAPA_NAGAR_2": "Independent_THAKKARBAPA_NAGAR_2", "RSP(S)": "RSP(S)", "Independent_THAKKARBAPA_NAGAR_3": "Independent_THAKKARBAPA_NAGAR_3", "Independent_BAPUNAGAR_1": "Independent_BAPUNAGAR_1", "Independent_BAPUNAGAR_2": "Independent_BAPUNAGAR_2", "Independent_BAPUNAGAR_3": "Independent_BAPUNAGAR_3", "Independent_BAPUNAGAR_4": "Independent_BAPUNAGAR_4", "Independent_BAPUNAGAR_5": "Independent_BAPUNAGAR_5", "BSDL": "BSDL", "Independent_BAPUNAGAR_6": "Independent_BAPUNAGAR_6", "Independent_AMRAIWADI_1": "Independent_AMRAIWADI_1", "Independent_AMRAIWADI_2": "Independent_AMRAIWADI_2", "Independent_DARIAPUR_1": "Independent_DARIAPUR_1", "Independent_DARIAPUR_2": "Independent_DARIAPUR_2", "Independent_DARIAPUR_3": "Independent_DARIAPUR_3", "DBSP": "DBSP", "Independent_DARIAPUR_4": "Independent_DARIAPUR_4", "Independent_DARIAPUR_5": "Independent_DARIAPUR_5", "Independent_DARIAPUR_6": "Independent_DARIAPUR_6", "Independent_DARIAPUR_7": "Independent_DARIAPUR_7", "Independent_DARIAPUR_8": "Independent_DARIAPUR_8", "Independent_DARIAPUR_9": "Independent_DARIAPUR_9", "Independent_DARIAPUR_10": "Independent_DARIAPUR_10", "Independent_DARIAPUR_11": "Independent_DARIAPUR_11", "Independent_JAMALPUR_KHADIA_1": "Independent_JAMALPUR_KHADIA_1", "Independent_JAMALPUR_KHADIA_2": "Independent_JAMALPUR_KHADIA_2", "Independent_JAMALPUR_KHADIA_3": "Independent_JAMALPUR_KHADIA_3", "Independent_JAMALPUR_KHADIA_4": "Independent_JAMALPUR_KHADIA_4", "Independent_MANINAGAR_1": "Independent_MANINAGAR_1", "Independent_MANINAGAR_2": "Independent_MANINAGAR_2", "NBN": "NBN", "Independent_DANILIMDA_1": "Independent_DANILIMDA_1", "LSWP": "LSWP", "Independent_DANILIMDA_2": "Independent_DANILIMDA_2", "Independent_DANILIMDA_3": "Independent_DANILIMDA_3", "NSM": "NSM", "Independent_ASARWA_1": "Independent_ASARWA_1", "Independent_ASARWA_2": "Independent_ASARWA_2", "BhDC": "BhDC", "Independent_ASARWA_3": "Independent_ASARWA_3", "Independent_DASKROI_1": "Independent_DASKROI_1", "Independent_DASKROI_2": "Independent_DASKROI_2", "Independent_DASKROI_3": "Independent_DASKROI_3", "Independent_DASKROI_4": "Independent_DASKROI_4", "Independent_DASKROI_5": "Independent_DASKROI_5", "Independent_DHOLKA_1": "Independent_DHOLKA_1", "Independent_DHOLKA_2": "Independent_DHOLKA_2", "Independent_DHOLKA_3": "Independent_DHOLKA_3", "Independent_DHOLKA_4": "Independent_DHOLKA_4", "Independent_DHANDHUKA_1": "Independent_DHANDHUKA_1", "Independent_DHANDHUKA_2": "Independent_DHANDHUKA_2", "Independent_DHANDHUKA_3": "Independent_DHANDHUKA_3", "Independent_DHANDHUKA_4": "Independent_DHANDHUKA_4", "Independent_DASADA_1": "Independent_DASADA_1", "Independent_DASADA_2": "Independent_DASADA_2", "Independent_DASADA_3": "Independent_DASADA_3", "Independent_LIMBDI_1": "Independent_LIMBDI_1", "Independent_LIMBDI_2": "Independent_LIMBDI_2", "Independent_LIMBDI_3": "Independent_LIMBDI_3", "Independent_LIMBDI_4": "Independent_LIMBDI_4", "Independent_LIMBDI_5": "Independent_LIMBDI_5", "Independent_LIMBDI_6": "Independent_LIMBDI_6", "Independent_LIMBDI_7": "Independent_LIMBDI_7", "Independent_WADHWAN_1": "Independent_WADHWAN_1", "Independent_WADHWAN_2": "Independent_WADHWAN_2", "Independent_WADHWAN_3": "Independent_WADHWAN_3", "Independent_WADHWAN_4": "Independent_WADHWAN_4", "Independent_WADHWAN_5": "Independent_WADHWAN_5", "Independent_WADHWAN_6": "Independent_WADHWAN_6", "Independent_WADHWAN_7": "Independent_WADHWAN_7", "Independent_CHOTILA_1": "Independent_CHOTILA_1", "ASP": "ASP", "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_1": "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_1", "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_2": "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_2", "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_3": "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_3", "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_4": "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_4", "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_5": "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_5", "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_6": "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_6", "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_7": "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_7", "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_8": "Independent_DHRANGADHRA_8", "Independent_MORVI_1": "Independent_MORVI_1", "Independent_MORVI_2": "Independent_MORVI_2", "ABMSD": "ABMSD", "Independent_MORVI_3": "Independent_MORVI_3", "Independent_TANKARA_1": "Independent_TANKARA_1", "Independent_TANKARA_2": "Independent_TANKARA_2", "Independent_TANKARA_3": "Independent_TANKARA_3", "Independent_TANKARA_4": "Independent_TANKARA_4", "Independent_TANKARA_5": "Independent_TANKARA_5", "Independent_TANKARA_6": "Independent_TANKARA_6", "Independent_TANKARA_7": "Independent_TANKARA_7", "Independent_TANKARA_8": "Independent_TANKARA_8", "Independent_WANKANER_1": "Independent_WANKANER_1", "Independent_WANKANER_2": "Independent_WANKANER_2", "Independent_WANKANER_3": "Independent_WANKANER_3", "Independent_WANKANER_4": "Independent_WANKANER_4", "Independent_RAJKOT_EAST_1": "Independent_RAJKOT_EAST_1", "Independent_RAJKOT_EAST_2": "Independent_RAJKOT_EAST_2", "Independent_RAJKOT_WEST_1": "Independent_RAJKOT_WEST_1", "Independent_RAJKOT_WEST_2": "Independent_RAJKOT_WEST_2", "Independent_RAJKOT_WEST_3": "Independent_RAJKOT_WEST_3", "Independent_RAJKOT_WEST_4": "Independent_RAJKOT_WEST_4", "Independent_RAJKOT_WEST_5": "Independent_RAJKOT_WEST_5", "Independent_RAJKOT_WEST_6": "Independent_RAJKOT_WEST_6", "RKSP": "RKSP", "Independent_RAJKOT_WEST_7": "Independent_RAJKOT_WEST_7", "Independent_RAJKOT_WEST_8": "Independent_RAJKOT_WEST_8", "Independent_RAJKOT_SOUTH_1": "Independent_RAJKOT_SOUTH_1", "Independent_RAJKOT_SOUTH_2": "Independent_RAJKOT_SOUTH_2", "Independent_RAJKOT_RURAL_1": "Independent_RAJKOT_RURAL_1", "Independent_RAJKOT_RURAL_2": "Independent_RAJKOT_RURAL_2", "Independent_RAJKOT_RURAL_3": "Independent_RAJKOT_RURAL_3", "Independent_RAJKOT_RURAL_4": "Independent_RAJKOT_RURAL_4", "Independent_JASDAN_1": "Independent_JASDAN_1", "Independent_JASDAN_2": "Independent_JASDAN_2", "Independent_JASDAN_3": "Independent_JASDAN_3", "Independent_JASDAN_4": "Independent_JASDAN_4", "Independent_JASDAN_5": "Independent_JASDAN_5", "Independent_JASDAN_6": "Independent_JASDAN_6", "Independent_JASDAN_7": "Independent_JASDAN_7", "Independent_JASDAN_8": "Independent_JASDAN_8", "Independent_JASDAN_9": "Independent_JASDAN_9", "Independent_JASDAN_10": "Independent_JASDAN_10", "Independent_GONDAL_1": "Independent_GONDAL_1", "Independent_GONDAL_2": "Independent_GONDAL_2", "Independent_JETPUR_1": "Independent_JETPUR_1", "Independent_JETPUR_2": "Independent_JETPUR_2", "Independent_JETPUR_3": "Independent_JETPUR_3", "Independent_JETPUR_4": "Independent_JETPUR_4", "Independent_JETPUR_5": "Independent_JETPUR_5", "Independent_JETPUR_6": "Independent_JETPUR_6", "Independent_JETPUR_7": "Independent_JETPUR_7", "Independent_JETPUR_8": "Independent_JETPUR_8", "Independent_JETPUR_9": "Independent_JETPUR_9", "Independent_JETPUR_10": "Independent_JETPUR_10", "Independent_JETPUR_11": "Independent_JETPUR_11", "Independent_JETPUR_12": "Independent_JETPUR_12", "Independent_JETPUR_13": "Independent_JETPUR_13", "Independent_DHORAJI_1": "Independent_DHORAJI_1", "Independent_DHORAJI_2": "Independent_DHORAJI_2", "Independent_DHORAJI_3": "Independent_DHORAJI_3", "Independent_DHORAJI_4": "Independent_DHORAJI_4", "Independent_DHORAJI_5": "Independent_DHORAJI_5", "Independent_DHORAJI_6": "Independent_DHORAJI_6", "Independent_DHORAJI_7": "Independent_DHORAJI_7", "Independent_DHORAJI_8": "Independent_DHORAJI_8", "Independent_DHORAJI_9": "Independent_DHORAJI_9", "Independent_DHORAJI_10": "Independent_DHORAJI_10", "Independent_DHORAJI_11": "Independent_DHORAJI_11", "Independent_KALAWAD_1": "Independent_KALAWAD_1", "Independent_KALAWAD_2": "Independent_KALAWAD_2", "Independent_KALAWAD_3": "Independent_KALAWAD_3", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_1": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_1", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_2": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_2", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_3": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_3", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_4": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_4", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_5": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_5", "RKEP": "RKEP", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_6": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_6", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_7": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_7", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_8": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_RURAL_8", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_NORTH_1": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_NORTH_1", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_NORTH_2": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_NORTH_2", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_NORTH_3": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_NORTH_3", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_NORTH_4": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_NORTH_4", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_NORTH_5": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_NORTH_5", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_NORTH_6": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_NORTH_6", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_NORTH_7": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_NORTH_7", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_SOUTH_1": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_SOUTH_1", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_SOUTH_2": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_SOUTH_2", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_SOUTH_3": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_SOUTH_3", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_SOUTH_4": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_SOUTH_4", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_SOUTH_5": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_SOUTH_5", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_SOUTH_6": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_SOUTH_6", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_SOUTH_7": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_SOUTH_7", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_SOUTH_8": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_SOUTH_8", "Independent_JAMNAGAR_SOUTH_9": "Independent_JAMNAGAR_SOUTH_9", "Independent_JAMJODHPUR_1": "Independent_JAMJODHPUR_1", "Independent_JAMJODHPUR_2": "Independent_JAMJODHPUR_2", "Independent_JAMJODHPUR_3": "Independent_JAMJODHPUR_3", "Independent_JAMJODHPUR_4": "Independent_JAMJODHPUR_4", "Independent_JAMJODHPUR_5": "Independent_JAMJODHPUR_5", "Independent_JAMJODHPUR_6": "Independent_JAMJODHPUR_6", "Independent_JAMJODHPUR_7": "Independent_JAMJODHPUR_7", "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_1": "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_1", "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_2": "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_2", "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_3": "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_3", "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_4": "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_4", "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_5": "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_5", "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_6": "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_6", "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_7": "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_7", "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_8": "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_8", "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_9": "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_9", "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_10": "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_10", "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_11": "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_11", "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_12": "Independent_KHAMBHALIA_12", "Independent_DWARKA_1": "Independent_DWARKA_1", "Independent_DWARKA_2": "Independent_DWARKA_2", "Independent_DWARKA_3": "Independent_DWARKA_3", "Independent_DWARKA_4": "Independent_DWARKA_4", "Independent_DWARKA_5": "Independent_DWARKA_5", "Independent_DWARKA_6": "Independent_DWARKA_6", "Independent_DWARKA_7": "Independent_DWARKA_7", "Independent_DWARKA_8": "Independent_DWARKA_8", "Independent_DWARKA_9": "Independent_DWARKA_9", "Independent_DWARKA_10": "Independent_DWARKA_10", "Independent_DWARKA_11": "Independent_DWARKA_11", "Independent_PORBANDAR_1": "Independent_PORBANDAR_1", "Independent_PORBANDAR_2": "Independent_PORBANDAR_2", "Independent_PORBANDAR_3": "Independent_PORBANDAR_3", "Independent_PORBANDAR_4": "Independent_PORBANDAR_4", "Independent_KUTIYANA_1": "Independent_KUTIYANA_1", "Independent_KUTIYANA_2": "Independent_KUTIYANA_2", "Independent_KUTIYANA_3": "Independent_KUTIYANA_3", "Independent_KUTIYANA_4": "Independent_KUTIYANA_4", "Independent_KUTIYANA_5": "Independent_KUTIYANA_5", "Independent_KUTIYANA_6": "Independent_KUTIYANA_6", "Independent_KUTIYANA_7": "Independent_KUTIYANA_7", "Independent_MANAVADAR_1": "Independent_MANAVADAR_1", "Independent_MANAVADAR_2": "Independent_MANAVADAR_2", "Independent_MANAVADAR_3": "Independent_MANAVADAR_3", "Independent_JUNAGADH_1": "Independent_JUNAGADH_1", "Independent_JUNAGADH_2": "Independent_JUNAGADH_2", "Independent_JUNAGADH_3": "Independent_JUNAGADH_3", "HND": "HND", "Independent_JUNAGADH_4": "Independent_JUNAGADH_4", "Independent_VISAVADAR_1": "Independent_VISAVADAR_1", "Independent_VISAVADAR_2": "Independent_VISAVADAR_2", "Independent_VISAVADAR_3": "Independent_VISAVADAR_3", "Independent_VISAVADAR_4": "Independent_VISAVADAR_4", "Independent_VISAVADAR_5": "Independent_VISAVADAR_5", "Independent_VISAVADAR_6": "Independent_VISAVADAR_6", "Independent_VISAVADAR_7": "Independent_VISAVADAR_7", "Independent_KESHOD_1": "Independent_KESHOD_1", "Independent_KESHOD_2": "Independent_KESHOD_2", "Independent_KESHOD_3": "Independent_KESHOD_3", "Independent_MANGROL_1": "Independent_MANGROL_1", "Independent_MANGROL_2": "Independent_MANGROL_2", "Independent_MANGROL_3": "Independent_MANGROL_3", "Independent_MANGROL_4": "Independent_MANGROL_4", "Independent_SOMNATH_1": "Independent_SOMNATH_1", "Independent_SOMNATH_2": "Independent_SOMNATH_2", "Independent_SOMNATH_3": "Independent_SOMNATH_3", "Independent_SOMNATH_4": "Independent_SOMNATH_4", "Independent_SOMNATH_5": "Independent_SOMNATH_5", "Independent_SOMNATH_6": "Independent_SOMNATH_6", "Independent_SOMNATH_7": "Independent_SOMNATH_7", "Independent_SOMNATH_8": "Independent_SOMNATH_8", "Independent_SOMNATH_9": "Independent_SOMNATH_9", "Independent_SOMNATH_10": "Independent_SOMNATH_10", "Independent_TALALA_1": "Independent_TALALA_1", "Independent_TALALA_2": "Independent_TALALA_2", "Independent_KODINAR_1": "Independent_KODINAR_1", "Independent_KODINAR_2": "Independent_KODINAR_2", "Independent_KODINAR_3": "Independent_KODINAR_3", "Independent_KODINAR_4": "Independent_KODINAR_4", "Independent_UNA_1": "Independent_UNA_1", "Independent_DHARI_1": "Independent_DHARI_1", "Independent_DHARI_2": "Independent_DHARI_2", "Independent_DHARI_3": "Independent_DHARI_3", "Independent_DHARI_4": "Independent_DHARI_4", "Independent_DHARI_5": "Independent_DHARI_5", "Independent_AMRELI_1": "Independent_AMRELI_1", "Independent_AMRELI_2": "Independent_AMRELI_2", "Independent_AMRELI_3": "Independent_AMRELI_3", "Independent_AMRELI_4": "Independent_AMRELI_4", "Independent_AMRELI_5": "Independent_AMRELI_5", "Independent_AMRELI_6": "Independent_AMRELI_6", "Independent_LATHI_1": "Independent_LATHI_1", "Independent_LATHI_2": "Independent_LATHI_2", "Independent_LATHI_3": "Independent_LATHI_3", "Independent_LATHI_4": "Independent_LATHI_4", "Independent_SAVARKUNDLA_1": "Independent_SAVARKUNDLA_1", "Independent_SAVARKUNDLA_2": "Independent_SAVARKUNDLA_2", "Independent_SAVARKUNDLA_3": "Independent_SAVARKUNDLA_3", "Independent_SAVARKUNDLA_4": "Independent_SAVARKUNDLA_4", "Independent_SAVARKUNDLA_5": "Independent_SAVARKUNDLA_5", "Independent_RAJULA_1": "Independent_RAJULA_1", "Independent_RAJULA_2": "Independent_RAJULA_2", "Independent_RAJULA_3": "Independent_RAJULA_3", "Independent_RAJULA_4": "Independent_RAJULA_4", "Independent_RAJULA_5": "Independent_RAJULA_5", "Independent_RAJULA_6": "Independent_RAJULA_6", "Independent_MAHUVA_1": "Independent_MAHUVA_1", "Independent_MAHUVA_2": "Independent_MAHUVA_2", "Independent_TALAJA_1": "Independent_TALAJA_1", "Independent_TALAJA_2": "Independent_TALAJA_2", "Independent_TALAJA_3": "Independent_TALAJA_3", "Independent_TALAJA_4": "Independent_TALAJA_4", "Independent_GARIADHAR_1": "Independent_GARIADHAR_1", "Independent_GARIADHAR_2": "Independent_GARIADHAR_2", "Independent_GARIADHAR_3": "Independent_GARIADHAR_3", "Independent_GARIADHAR_4": "Independent_GARIADHAR_4", "Independent_GARIADHAR_5": "Independent_GARIADHAR_5", "Independent_GARIADHAR_6": "Independent_GARIADHAR_6", "Independent_GARIADHAR_7": "Independent_GARIADHAR_7", "Independent_PALITANA_1": "Independent_PALITANA_1", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_RURAL_1": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_RURAL_1", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_RURAL_2": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_RURAL_2", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_RURAL_3": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_RURAL_3", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_RURAL_4": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_RURAL_4", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_RURAL_5": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_RURAL_5", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_RURAL_6": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_RURAL_6", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_RURAL_7": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_RURAL_7", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_RURAL_8": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_RURAL_8", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_RURAL_9": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_RURAL_9", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_RURAL_10": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_RURAL_10", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_EAST_1": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_EAST_1", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_EAST_2": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_EAST_2", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_EAST_3": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_EAST_3", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_EAST_4": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_EAST_4", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_EAST_5": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_EAST_5", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_WEST_1": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_WEST_1", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_WEST_2": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_WEST_2", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_WEST_3": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_WEST_3", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_WEST_4": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_WEST_4", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_WEST_5": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_WEST_5", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_WEST_6": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_WEST_6", "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_WEST_7": "Independent_BHAVNAGAR_WEST_7", "Independent_GADHADA_1": "Independent_GADHADA_1", "Independent_GADHADA_2": "Independent_GADHADA_2", "Independent_GADHADA_3": "Independent_GADHADA_3", "Independent_GADHADA_4": "Independent_GADHADA_4", "Independent_GADHADA_5": "Independent_GADHADA_5", "Independent_BOTAD_1": "Independent_BOTAD_1", "Independent_BOTAD_2": "Independent_BOTAD_2", "Independent_BOTAD_3": "Independent_BOTAD_3", "Independent_BOTAD_4": "Independent_BOTAD_4", "Independent_BOTAD_5": "Independent_BOTAD_5", "Independent_BOTAD_6": "Independent_BOTAD_6", "Independent_BOTAD_7": "Independent_BOTAD_7", "Independent_BOTAD_8": "Independent_BOTAD_8", "Independent_BORSAD_1": "Independent_BORSAD_1", "Independent_ANKLAV_1": "Independent_ANKLAV_1", "Independent_UMRETH_1": "Independent_UMRETH_1", "Independent_UMRETH_2": "Independent_UMRETH_2", "Independent_UMRETH_3": "Independent_UMRETH_3", "Independent_UMRETH_4": "Independent_UMRETH_4", "Independent_UMRETH_5": "Independent_UMRETH_5", "Independent_ANAND_1": "Independent_ANAND_1", "Independent_ANAND_2": "Independent_ANAND_2", "Independent_ANAND_3": "Independent_ANAND_3", "Independent_ANAND_4": "Independent_ANAND_4", "ABJS": "ABJS", "Independent_SOJITRA_1": "Independent_SOJITRA_1", "Independent_SOJITRA_2": "Independent_SOJITRA_2", "Independent_MATAR_1": "Independent_MATAR_1", "Independent_MATAR_2": "Independent_MATAR_2", "Independent_MATAR_3": "Independent_MATAR_3", "Independent_MATAR_4": "Independent_MATAR_4", "Independent_NADIAD_1": "Independent_NADIAD_1", "Independent_NADIAD_2": "Independent_NADIAD_2", "Independent_NADIAD_3": "Independent_NADIAD_3", "Independent_NADIAD_4": "Independent_NADIAD_4", "Independent_NADIAD_5": "Independent_NADIAD_5", "Independent_NADIAD_6": "Independent_NADIAD_6", "Independent_NADIAD_7": "Independent_NADIAD_7", "Independent_NADIAD_8": "Independent_NADIAD_8", "Independent_MAHUDHA_1": "Independent_MAHUDHA_1", "Independent_MAHUDHA_2": "Independent_MAHUDHA_2", "Independent_MAHUDHA_3": "Independent_MAHUDHA_3", "Independent_THASRA_1": "Independent_THASRA_1", "Independent_THASRA_2": "Independent_THASRA_2", "Independent_THASRA_3": "Independent_THASRA_3", "Independent_KAPADWANJ_1": "Independent_KAPADWANJ_1", "Independent_KAPADWANJ_2": "Independent_KAPADWANJ_2", "Independent_BALASINOR_1": "Independent_BALASINOR_1", "Independent_BALASINOR_2": "Independent_BALASINOR_2", "Independent_BALASINOR_3": "Independent_BALASINOR_3", "Independent_BALASINOR_4": "Independent_BALASINOR_4", "Independent_LUNAWADA_1": "Independent_LUNAWADA_1", "Independent_MORVA_HADAF_1": "Independent_MORVA_HADAF_1", "Independent_GODHRA_1": "Independent_GODHRA_1", "Independent_GODHRA_2": "Independent_GODHRA_2", "Independent_GODHRA_3": "Independent_GODHRA_3", "Independent_JHALOD_1": "Independent_JHALOD_1", "Independent_LIMKHEDA_1": "Independent_LIMKHEDA_1", "Independent_DAHOD_1": "Independent_DAHOD_1", "Independent_DAHOD_2": "Independent_DAHOD_2", "Independent_DAHOD_3": "Independent_DAHOD_3", "Independent_DEVGADH_BARIA_1": "Independent_DEVGADH_BARIA_1", "Independent_DEVGADH_BARIA_2": "Independent_DEVGADH_BARIA_2", "Independent_SAVLI_1": "Independent_SAVLI_1", "Independent_SAVLI_2": "Independent_SAVLI_2", "Independent_SAVLI_3": "Independent_SAVLI_3", "Independent_SAVLI_4": "Independent_SAVLI_4", "Independent_VAGHODIA_1": "Independent_VAGHODIA_1", "Independent_VAGHODIA_2": "Independent_VAGHODIA_2", "Independent_VAGHODIA_3": "Independent_VAGHODIA_3", "Independent_CHHOTA_UDAIPUR_1": "Independent_CHHOTA_UDAIPUR_1", "Independent_JETPUR_ST_1": "Independent_JETPUR_ST_1", "Independent_JETPUR_ST_2": "Independent_JETPUR_ST_2", "Independent_SANKHEDA_1": "Independent_SANKHEDA_1", "Independent_DABHOI_1": "Independent_DABHOI_1", "Independent_DABHOI_2": "Independent_DABHOI_2", "Independent_DABHOI_3": "Independent_DABHOI_3", "Independent_DABHOI_4": "Independent_DABHOI_4", "Independent_VADODARA_CITY_1": "Independent_VADODARA_CITY_1", "Independent_VADODARA_CITY_2": "Independent_VADODARA_CITY_2", "Independent_SAYAJIGANJ_1": "Independent_SAYAJIGANJ_1", "Independent_SAYAJIGANJ_2": "Independent_SAYAJIGANJ_2", "Independent_SAYAJIGANJ_3": "Independent_SAYAJIGANJ_3", "RSPS": "RSPS", "Independent_AKOTA_1": "Independent_AKOTA_1", "Independent_AKOTA_2": "Independent_AKOTA_2", "Independent_AKOTA_3": "Independent_AKOTA_3", "Independent_AKOTA_4": "Independent_AKOTA_4", "Independent_RAOPURA_1": "Independent_RAOPURA_1", "Independent_RAOPURA_2": "Independent_RAOPURA_2", "Independent_MANJALPUR_1": "Independent_MANJALPUR_1", "Independent_MANJALPUR_2": "Independent_MANJALPUR_2", "Independent_PADRA_1": "Independent_PADRA_1", "Independent_PADRA_2": "Independent_PADRA_2", "Independent_PADRA_3": "Independent_PADRA_3", "Independent_PADRA_4": "Independent_PADRA_4", "Independent_PADRA_5": "Independent_PADRA_5", "Independent_KARJAN_1": "Independent_KARJAN_1", "Independent_KARJAN_2": "Independent_KARJAN_2", "Independent_KARJAN_3": "Independent_KARJAN_3", "Independent_KARJAN_4": "Independent_KARJAN_4", "Independent_KARJAN_5": "Independent_KARJAN_5", "Independent_NANDOD_1": "Independent_NANDOD_1", "Independent_NANDOD_2": "Independent_NANDOD_2", "Independent_NANDOD_3": "Independent_NANDOD_3", "Independent_DEDIAPADA_1": "Independent_DEDIAPADA_1", "Independent_DEDIAPADA_2": "Independent_DEDIAPADA_2", "Independent_DEDIAPADA_3": "Independent_DEDIAPADA_3", "Independent_DEDIAPADA_4": "Independent_DEDIAPADA_4", "Independent_JAMBUSAR_1": "Independent_JAMBUSAR_1", "Independent_JAMBUSAR_2": "Independent_JAMBUSAR_2", "Independent_VAGRA_1": "Independent_VAGRA_1", "Independent_VAGRA_2": "Independent_VAGRA_2", "Independent_BHARUCH_1": "Independent_BHARUCH_1", "Independent_BHARUCH_2": "Independent_BHARUCH_2", "Independent_BHARUCH_3": "Independent_BHARUCH_3", "Independent_BHARUCH_4": "Independent_BHARUCH_4", "Independent_ANKLESHWAR_1": "Independent_ANKLESHWAR_1", "Independent_ANKLESHWAR_2": "Independent_ANKLESHWAR_2", "Independent_ANKLESHWAR_3": "Independent_ANKLESHWAR_3", "Independent_ANKLESHWAR_4": "Independent_ANKLESHWAR_4", "Independent_OLPAD_1": "Independent_OLPAD_1", "Independent_OLPAD_2": "Independent_OLPAD_2", "Independent_OLPAD_3": "Independent_OLPAD_3", "IF": "IF", "YuS": "YuS", "Independent_OLPAD_4": "Independent_OLPAD_4", "Independent_OLPAD_5": "Independent_OLPAD_5", "Independent_MANGROL_ST_1": "Independent_MANGROL_ST_1", "Independent_MANDVI_ST_1": "Independent_MANDVI_ST_1", "Independent_KAMREJ_1": "Independent_KAMREJ_1", "Independent_KAMREJ_2": "Independent_KAMREJ_2", "Independent_SURAT_EAST_1": "Independent_SURAT_EAST_1", "Independent_SURAT_EAST_2": "Independent_SURAT_EAST_2", "Independent_SURAT_EAST_3": "Independent_SURAT_EAST_3", "Independent_SURAT_EAST_4": "Independent_SURAT_EAST_4", "Independent_SURAT_EAST_5": "Independent_SURAT_EAST_5", "Independent_SURAT_EAST_6": "Independent_SURAT_EAST_6", "Independent_SURAT_EAST_7": "Independent_SURAT_EAST_7", "Independent_SURAT_EAST_8": "Independent_SURAT_EAST_8", "Independent_SURAT_EAST_9": "Independent_SURAT_EAST_9", "Independent_SURAT_EAST_10": "Independent_SURAT_EAST_10", "Independent_SURAT_NORTH_1": "Independent_SURAT_NORTH_1", "Independent_SURAT_NORTH_2": "Independent_SURAT_NORTH_2", "Independent_SURAT_NORTH_3": "Independent_SURAT_NORTH_3", "Independent_SURAT_NORTH_4": "Independent_SURAT_NORTH_4", "Independent_SURAT_NORTH_5": "Independent_SURAT_NORTH_5", "Independent_SURAT_NORTH_6": "Independent_SURAT_NORTH_6", "Independent_SURAT_NORTH_7": "Independent_SURAT_NORTH_7", "Independent_SURAT_NORTH_8": "Independent_SURAT_NORTH_8", "Independent_SURAT_NORTH_9": "Independent_SURAT_NORTH_9", "Independent_VARACHHA_ROAD_1": "Independent_VARACHHA_ROAD_1", "Independent_LIMBAYAT_1": "Independent_LIMBAYAT_1", "Independent_LIMBAYAT_2": "Independent_LIMBAYAT_2", "Independent_LIMBAYAT_3": "Independent_LIMBAYAT_3", "Independent_LIMBAYAT_4": "Independent_LIMBAYAT_4", "Independent_LIMBAYAT_5": "Independent_LIMBAYAT_5", "Independent_LIMBAYAT_6": "Independent_LIMBAYAT_6", "Independent_LIMBAYAT_7": "Independent_LIMBAYAT_7", "Independent_LIMBAYAT_8": "Independent_LIMBAYAT_8", "Independent_LIMBAYAT_9": "Independent_LIMBAYAT_9", "Independent_LIMBAYAT_10": "Independent_LIMBAYAT_10", "Independent_LIMBAYAT_11": "Independent_LIMBAYAT_11", "Independent_UDHNA_1": "Independent_UDHNA_1", "Independent_UDHNA_2": "Independent_UDHNA_2", "Independent_UDHNA_3": "Independent_UDHNA_3", "Independent_KATARGAM_1": "Independent_KATARGAM_1", "Independent_SURAT_WEST_1": "Independent_SURAT_WEST_1", "Independent_CHORASI_1": "Independent_CHORASI_1", "Independent_CHORASI_2": "Independent_CHORASI_2", "Independent_CHORASI_3": "Independent_CHORASI_3", "Independent_CHORASI_4": "Independent_CHORASI_4", "Independent_CHORASI_5": "Independent_CHORASI_5", "Independent_BARDOLI_1": "Independent_BARDOLI_1", "Independent_MAHUVA_ST_1": "Independent_MAHUVA_ST_1", "Independent_MAHUVA_ST_2": "Independent_MAHUVA_ST_2", "Independent_VYARA_1": "Independent_VYARA_1", "Independent_VYARA_2": "Independent_VYARA_2", "AJKP": "AJKP", "Independent_VYARA_3": "Independent_VYARA_3", "Independent_VYARA_4": "Independent_VYARA_4", "Independent_NIZAR_1": "Independent_NIZAR_1", "Independent_NIZAR_2": "Independent_NIZAR_2", "Independent_DANGS_1": "Independent_DANGS_1", "Independent_JALALPORE_1": "Independent_JALALPORE_1", "Independent_NAVSARI_1": "Independent_NAVSARI_1", "Independent_NAVSARI_2": "Independent_NAVSARI_2", "Independent_NAVSARI_3": "Independent_NAVSARI_3", "Independent_NAVSARI_4": "Independent_NAVSARI_4", "Independent_NAVSARI_5": "Independent_NAVSARI_5", "Independent_VANSDA_1": "Independent_VANSDA_1", "Independent_VANSDA_2": "Independent_VANSDA_2", "Independent_VALSAD_1": "Independent_VALSAD_1", "Independent_PARDI_1": "Independent_PARDI_1", "Independent_PARDI_2": "Independent_PARDI_2", "Independent_PARDI_3": "Independent_PARDI_3", "Independent_KAPRADA_1": "Independent_KAPRADA_1", "Independent_KAPRADA_2": "Independent_KAPRADA_2", "Independent_UMBERGAON_1": "Independent_UMBERGAON_1", "Independent_UMBERGAON_2": "Independent_UMBERGAON_2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 182, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 182, "registered_not_positive": 182}, "n_stations_flagged": 182, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:52:04.156124", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.646, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.666, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.659, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.525, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.444, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.659, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.409, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.409, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.582, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 182}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "15fca5bd2e2d4fcdae928c7c45c518b8", "name": "India 2011 local (overnight kerala_2011.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2011, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Kerala/Kerala_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"MUL_P_B_ABDUL_RAZAK": "MUL_P_B_ABDUL_RAZAK", "BJP_K_SURENDRAN": "BJP_K_SURENDRAN", "CPM_ADV_C_H_KUNHAMBU": "CPM_ADV_C_H_KUNHAMBU", "IND_HAFSA_MUNEER": "IND_HAFSA_MUNEER", "BSP_ABDUL_MAJEED": "BSP_ABDUL_MAJEED", "IND_ABDULLA_TIMBER": "IND_ABDULLA_TIMBER", "IND_KUNHAMBU": "IND_KUNHAMBU", "IND_ABDUL_RAZAK_K": "IND_ABDUL_RAZAK_K", "IND_ABBAS_M": "IND_ABBAS_M", "IND_ABDULLA_P_M": "IND_ABDULLA_P_M", "MUL_N_A_NELLIKKUNNU": "MUL_N_A_NELLIKKUNNU", "BJP_JAYALAKSHMI_N_BHAT": "BJP_JAYALAKSHMI_N_BHAT", "INL_AZEEZ_KADAPPURAM": "INL_AZEEZ_KADAPPURAM", "SDPI_A_H_MUNEER": "SDPI_A_H_MUNEER", "IND_GOVINDA_RAJA_KUNTIKKANAMATA": "IND_GOVINDA_RAJA_KUNTIKKANAMATA", "BSP_SAIFUDEEN_K_MAKKODU": "BSP_SAIFUDEEN_K_MAKKODU", "IND_AJITH_KUMAR_AZAD": "IND_AJITH_KUMAR_AZAD", "IND_ABDULLA": "IND_ABDULLA", "CPM_K_KUNHIRAMAN": "CPM_K_KUNHIRAMAN", "INC_ADV_C_K_SREEDHARAN": "INC_ADV_C_K_SREEDHARAN", "BJP_SUNITHA_PRASANTH": "BJP_SUNITHA_PRASANTH", "SDPI_FAISAL_KOLIYADUKKAM": "SDPI_FAISAL_KOLIYADUKKAM", "BSP_P_DAMODARAN": "BSP_P_DAMODARAN", "IND_KRISHNANKUTTY": "IND_KRISHNANKUTTY", "IND_KUNHIRAMAN": "IND_KUNHIRAMAN", "CPI_E_CHANDRASHEKHARAN": "CPI_E_CHANDRASHEKHARAN", "INC_ADV_M_C_JOSE": "INC_ADV_M_C_JOSE", "BJP_MADIKAI_KAMMARAN": "BJP_MADIKAI_KAMMARAN", "IND_P_M_JOSEPH": "IND_P_M_JOSEPH", "BSP_GOPALAN_K": "BSP_GOPALAN_K", "INC_K_V_GANGADHARAN": "INC_K_V_GANGADHARAN", "BJP_T_RADHAKRISHNAN": "BJP_T_RADHAKRISHNAN", "SDPI_RAZAK_HAJI_PARAMBATH": "SDPI_RAZAK_HAJI_PARAMBATH", "BSP_ARUN_KUMAR": "BSP_ARUN_KUMAR", "IND_K_K_DILEEP_KUMAR": "IND_K_K_DILEEP_KUMAR", "CPM_C_KRISHNAN": "CPM_C_KRISHNAN", "INC_ADV_K_BRIJESH_KUMAR": "INC_ADV_K_BRIJESH_KUMAR", "BJP_C_K_RAMESAN_MASTER": "BJP_C_K_RAMESAN_MASTER", "BSP_GEETHA": "BSP_GEETHA", "IND_T_P_PADMANABHAN": "IND_T_P_PADMANABHAN", "SHS_KOTTAYODI_VISWANATHAN": "SHS_KOTTAYODI_VISWANATHAN", "CPM_T_V_RAJESH": "CPM_T_V_RAJESH", "INC_ADV_P_INDIRA": "INC_ADV_P_INDIRA", "BJP_ADV_SREEKANTH_RAVI_VARMA": "BJP_ADV_SREEKANTH_RAVI_VARMA", "SDPI_A_P_MAHAMOOD": "SDPI_A_P_MAHAMOOD", "BSP_K_GOPALAKRISHNAN": "BSP_K_GOPALAKRISHNAN", "CPM_JAMES_MATHEW": "CPM_JAMES_MATHEW", "KEC_M_ADV_JOB_MICHEL": "KEC_M_ADV_JOB_MICHEL", "BJP_K_JAYAPRAKASH": "BJP_K_JAYAPRAKASH", "SDPI_MUHAMMEDALI_S_P": "SDPI_MUHAMMEDALI_S_P", "BSP_NIDHEESH_THILLANKERI": "BSP_NIDHEESH_THILLANKERI", "IND_THOMAS_M_V": "IND_THOMAS_M_V", "INC_K_C_JOSEPH": "INC_K_C_JOSEPH", "CPI_ADV_P_SANTHOSH_KUMAR": "CPI_ADV_P_SANTHOSH_KUMAR", "BJP_M_G_RAMAKRISHNAN_NAIR": "BJP_M_G_RAMAKRISHNAN_NAIR", "IND_JOSEPH": "IND_JOSEPH", "IND_AMMINI_KRISHNAN": "IND_AMMINI_KRISHNAN", "BSP_BIJU_THOMAS": "BSP_BIJU_THOMAS", "MUL_K_M_SHAJI": "MUL_K_M_SHAJI", "CPM_M_PRAKASHAN_MASTER": "CPM_M_PRAKASHAN_MASTER", "BJP_M_K_SASEENDRAN_MASTER": "BJP_M_K_SASEENDRAN_MASTER", "IND_NOUSHAD_PUNNAKKAL": "IND_NOUSHAD_PUNNAKKAL", "IND_SHAJI_K_M": "IND_SHAJI_K_M", "BSP_C_BALAKRISHNAN": "BSP_C_BALAKRISHNAN", "SUCI_PAUL_T_SAMUEL": "SUCI_PAUL_T_SAMUEL", "IND_PRAKASHAN_KUZHIPARAMBIL": "IND_PRAKASHAN_KUZHIPARAMBIL", "INC_A_P_ABDULLAKUTTY": "INC_A_P_ABDULLAKUTTY", "IND_RAMACHANDRAN_KADANNAPPALLI": "IND_RAMACHANDRAN_KADANNAPPALLI", "BJP_U_T_JAYANDAN": "BJP_U_T_JAYANDAN", "SDPI_ADV_P_C_NOUSHAD": "SDPI_ADV_P_C_NOUSHAD", "IND_M_P_ABDULLAKUTTY": "IND_M_P_ABDULLAKUTTY", "IND_K_SUDHAKARAN": "IND_K_SUDHAKARAN", "BSP_S_NOORUDHEEN": "BSP_S_NOORUDHEEN", "CPM_K_K_NARAYANAN": "CPM_K_K_NARAYANAN", "IND_MAMBARAM_DIVAKARAN": "IND_MAMBARAM_DIVAKARAN", "BJP_C_P_SANGEETHA": "BJP_C_P_SANGEETHA", "IND_POYILORE_KUNNUMBROM_DIVAKARAN": "IND_POYILORE_KUNNUMBROM_DIVAKARAN", "BSP_MADHU_S_VAYANAN": "BSP_MADHU_S_VAYANAN", "CPM_KODIYERI_BALAKRISHNAN": "CPM_KODIYERI_BALAKRISHNAN", "INC_RIJIL_MAKKUTTY": "INC_RIJIL_MAKKUTTY", "BJP_ADV_V_RATHNAKARAN": "BJP_ADV_V_RATHNAKARAN", "SDPI_A_C_JALALUDDIN": "SDPI_A_C_JALALUDDIN", "BSP_K_RAGHUNATH": "BSP_K_RAGHUNATH", "IND_RIJIL_MULIYIL": "IND_RIJIL_MULIYIL", "IND_BALAKRISHNAN": "IND_BALAKRISHNAN", "SJD_K_P_MOHANAN_S_O_P_R_KURUP": "SJD_K_P_MOHANAN_S_O_P_R_KURUP", "IND_S_A_PUTHIYA_VALAPPIL": "IND_S_A_PUTHIYA_VALAPPIL", "BJP_O_K_VASU_MASTER": "BJP_O_K_VASU_MASTER", "IND_K_P_MOHANAN_S_O_KUNHIKANNAN": "IND_K_P_MOHANAN_S_O_KUNHIKANNAN", "IND_S_POOVALAPPIL": "IND_S_POOVALAPPIL", "IND_K_P_MOHANAN_S_O_NANU": "IND_K_P_MOHANAN_S_O_NANU", "IND_SULAIM_T_B": "IND_SULAIM_T_B", "CPM_E_P_JAYARAJAN": "CPM_E_P_JAYARAJAN", "SJD_JOSEPH_CHAAVARA": "SJD_JOSEPH_CHAAVARA", "BJP_BIJU_ELAKKUZHI": "BJP_BIJU_ELAKKUZHI", "SDPI_ADV_K_C_MUHAMMAD_SABEER": "SDPI_ADV_K_C_MUHAMMAD_SABEER", "BSP_HAMEED": "BSP_HAMEED", "INC_ADV_SUNNY_JOSEPH": "INC_ADV_SUNNY_JOSEPH", "CPM_K_K_SHAILAJA_TEACHER": "CPM_K_K_SHAILAJA_TEACHER", "BJP_P_K_VELAYUDHAN": "BJP_P_K_VELAYUDHAN", "SDPI_P_K_AYYAPPAN_MASTER": "SDPI_P_K_AYYAPPAN_MASTER", "IND_SUNNY_JOSEPH": "IND_SUNNY_JOSEPH", "IND_A_SHYLAJA": "IND_A_SHYLAJA", "BSP_RAGHAVAN": "BSP_RAGHAVAN", "IND_RADHAMANI_NARAYANA_KUMAR": "IND_RADHAMANI_NARAYANA_KUMAR", "INC_P_K_JAYALAKSHMI": "INC_P_K_JAYALAKSHMI", "CPM_K_C_KUNHIRAMAN": "CPM_K_C_KUNHIRAMAN", "BJP_IRUMUTTOOR_KUNHAMAN": "BJP_IRUMUTTOOR_KUNHAMAN", "SDPI_A_GOPAKUMAR": "SDPI_A_GOPAKUMAR", "IND_P_U_BABU": "IND_P_U_BABU", "BSP_ANNAN_MADAKKIMALA": "BSP_ANNAN_MADAKKIMALA", "INC_I_C_BALAKRISHNAN": "INC_I_C_BALAKRISHNAN", "CPM_E_A_SANKARAN": "CPM_E_A_SANKARAN", "BJP_PALLIYARA_RAMAN": "BJP_PALLIYARA_RAMAN", "BSP_MUKUNDAN_CHEENGERI": "BSP_MUKUNDAN_CHEENGERI", "SJD_M_V_SREYAMSKUMAR": "SJD_M_V_SREYAMSKUMAR", "CPM_P_A_MUHAMMED": "CPM_P_A_MUHAMMED", "BJP_ANAND_KUMAR_P_G": "BJP_ANAND_KUMAR_P_G", "SDPI_JAMEELA": "SDPI_JAMEELA", "IND_K_NASEERUDHEEN": "IND_K_NASEERUDHEEN", "IND_CLEATUS": "IND_CLEATUS", "BSP_MUJEEB_RAHMAN_ANJUKUNNU": "BSP_MUJEEB_RAHMAN_ANJUKUNNU", "JD_S_C_K_NANU": "JD_S_C_K_NANU", "SJD_ADV_M_K_PREMNATH": "SJD_ADV_M_K_PREMNATH", "IND_N_VENU": "IND_N_VENU", "BJP_M_P_RAJAN": "BJP_M_P_RAJAN", "SDPI_SAALIM_AZHIYUR": "SDPI_SAALIM_AZHIYUR", "IND_V_K_PREMANATHAN": "IND_V_K_PREMANATHAN", "CPM_K_K_LATHIKA": "CPM_K_K_LATHIKA", "MUL_SOOPI_NARIKKATTERI": "MUL_SOOPI_NARIKKATTERI", "BJP_V_K_SAJEEVAN": "BJP_V_K_SAJEEVAN", "SDPI_ABDUL_RAHEEM_MASTER": "SDPI_ABDUL_RAHEEM_MASTER", "BSP_M_SATHI": "BSP_M_SATHI", "IND_SOOPI_THODUVAYIL_VALAPPIL_MEETHAL": "IND_SOOPI_THODUVAYIL_VALAPPIL_MEETHAL", "IND_LATHIKA_VALIYAKULANGARA_KUNIYIL": "IND_LATHIKA_VALIYAKULANGARA_KUNIYIL", "IND_SOOPI_ALAKKATT": "IND_SOOPI_ALAKKATT", "IND_LATHIKA_NIDUMANALKUNI": "IND_LATHIKA_NIDUMANALKUNI", "SUCI_M_K_RAJAN": "SUCI_M_K_RAJAN", "CPI_E_K_VIJAYAN": "CPI_E_K_VIJAYAN", "INC_V_M_CHANDRAN": "INC_V_M_CHANDRAN", "BJP_ADV_PRAKASH_BABU": "BJP_ADV_PRAKASH_BABU", "SDPI_ISMAIL_KAMMANA": "SDPI_ISMAIL_KAMMANA", "IND_CHANDRAN": "IND_CHANDRAN", "IND_C_K_VIJAYAN": "IND_C_K_VIJAYAN", "IND_K_P_VIJAYAN": "IND_K_P_VIJAYAN", "CPM_K_DASAN": "CPM_K_DASAN", "INC_AD_K_P_ANIL_KUMAR": "INC_AD_K_P_ANIL_KUMAR", "BJP_T_P_JAYACHANDRAN_MASTER": "BJP_T_P_JAYACHANDRAN_MASTER", "IND_C_MUNEER": "IND_C_MUNEER", "SDPI_RASHID_P_T": "SDPI_RASHID_P_T", "IND_K_P_ANILKUMAR": "IND_K_P_ANILKUMAR", "BSP_K_V_KRISHNANKODUVAYAL": "BSP_K_V_KRISHNANKODUVAYAL", "IND_DASAN_M_K": "IND_DASAN_M_K", "IND_DASAN_V_K": "IND_DASAN_V_K", "CPM_K_KUNHAMMAD_MASTER": "CPM_K_KUNHAMMAD_MASTER", "KEC_M_ADV_MOHAMMED_IKBAL": "KEC_M_ADV_MOHAMMED_IKBAL", "BJP_P_CHANDRIKA_TEACHER": "BJP_P_CHANDRIKA_TEACHER", "SDPI_T_K_KUNHAMMAD_FAISY": "SDPI_T_K_KUNHAMMAD_FAISY", "IND_AKHILKUMAR": "IND_AKHILKUMAR", "BSP_K_K_VASU": "BSP_K_K_VASU", "CPM_PURUSHAN_KADALUNDI": "CPM_PURUSHAN_KADALUNDI", "INC_A_BALARAM": "INC_A_BALARAM", "BJP_ADV_T_K_RAMAN": "BJP_ADV_T_K_RAMAN", "SDPI_BHADRAN_M_P": "SDPI_BHADRAN_M_P", "BSP_K_K_SATHEESH": "BSP_K_K_SATHEESH", "NCP_A_K_SASEENDRAN": "NCP_A_K_SASEENDRAN", "SJD_SHAIK_P_HARRIZ": "SJD_SHAIK_P_HARRIZ", "BJP_V_V_RAJAN": "BJP_V_V_RAJAN", "IND_A_SASINDRAN": "IND_A_SASINDRAN", "BSP_RAMESH_NANMANDA": "BSP_RAMESH_NANMANDA", "CPM_A_PRADEEP_KUMAR": "CPM_A_PRADEEP_KUMAR", "INC_P_V_GANGADHARAN": "INC_P_V_GANGADHARAN", "BJP_P_REGHUNATH": "BJP_P_REGHUNATH", "IND_PRADEEP_KUMAR": "IND_PRADEEP_KUMAR", "IND_GANGADHARAN": "IND_GANGADHARAN", "BSP_LOOKA_JOSEPH": "BSP_LOOKA_JOSEPH", "SUCI_P_M_SREEKUMAR": "SUCI_P_M_SREEKUMAR", "MUL_DR_M_K_MUNEER": "MUL_DR_M_K_MUNEER", "CPM_C_P_MUSAFER_AHAMMED": "CPM_C_P_MUSAFER_AHAMMED", "BJP_JAYA_SADANANDAN": "BJP_JAYA_SADANANDAN", "SDPI_FAIZ_MOHAMMED": "SDPI_FAIZ_MOHAMMED", "IND_T_T_MUNEER": "IND_T_T_MUNEER", "IND_MUSSAFAR_AHAMMED": "IND_MUSSAFAR_AHAMMED", "BSP_MUHAMMED_ASHARAF": "BSP_MUHAMMED_ASHARAF", "CPM_ELAMARAM_KAREEM": "CPM_ELAMARAM_KAREEM", "INC_ADAM_MULSI_M_P": "INC_ADAM_MULSI_M_P", "BJP_K_P_SREESAN": "BJP_K_P_SREESAN", "SDPI_MUHAMMED_MUSTHAFA": "SDPI_MUHAMMED_MUSTHAFA", "IND_K_S_HARIHARAN": "IND_K_S_HARIHARAN", "BSP_K_T_LATHA": "BSP_K_T_LATHA", "IND_ADAM_MALIQUE_E": "IND_ADAM_MALIQUE_E", "IND_ABDUL_KAREEM": "IND_ABDUL_KAREEM", "IND_ADV_P_T_A_RAHIM": "IND_ADV_P_T_A_RAHIM", "IND_U_C_RAMAN": "IND_U_C_RAMAN", "BJP_C_K_PADMANABHAN": "BJP_C_K_PADMANABHAN", "SDPI_C_MUHAMMED_MASTER": "SDPI_C_MUHAMMED_MASTER", "IND_RAMAN_C_K": "IND_RAMAN_C_K", "IND_K_K_KUNHIKANARAN": "IND_K_K_KUNHIKANARAN", "IND_E_P_ABDUL_RAHEEM": "IND_E_P_ABDUL_RAHEEM", "IND_RAMAN_P_C": "IND_RAMAN_P_C", "IND_ABDU_RAHEEM_M_T": "IND_ABDU_RAHEEM_M_T", "SHS_M_P_BABURAJ": "SHS_M_P_BABURAJ", "BSP_O_P_SUNDARAN": "BSP_O_P_SUNDARAN", "MUL_V_M_UMMER_MASTER": "MUL_V_M_UMMER_MASTER", "CPM_M_MEHABOOB": "CPM_M_MEHABOOB", "BJP_GIREESH_THEVALLY": "BJP_GIREESH_THEVALLY", "SDPI_M_T_ABU_HAJI": "SDPI_M_T_ABU_HAJI", "BSP_ABOOBAKER": "BSP_ABOOBAKER", "IND_MEHABOOB_KANICHADIKKUZHI_VALEPARAMMEL": "IND_MEHABOOB_KANICHADIKKUZHI_VALEPARAMMEL", "IND_UMMER": "IND_UMMER", "IND_MEHABOOB_ILLIKKATHODI": "IND_MEHABOOB_ILLIKKATHODI", "MUL_C_MOYINKUTTY": "MUL_C_MOYINKUTTY", "CPM_GEORGE_M_THOMAS": "CPM_GEORGE_M_THOMAS", "BJP_JOSE_KAPPATTMALA": "BJP_JOSE_KAPPATTMALA", "SDPI_C_T_ASHRAF": "SDPI_C_T_ASHRAF", "IND_K_MOYINKUTTY": "IND_K_MOYINKUTTY", "IND_GEORGE_THOMAS": "IND_GEORGE_THOMAS", "IND_K_P_BASHEER_HAJI": "IND_K_P_BASHEER_HAJI", "BSP_GAFOOR_PUTHUPPADY": "BSP_GAFOOR_PUTHUPPADY", "MUL_K_MUHAMMEDUNNI_HAJI": "MUL_K_MUHAMMEDUNNI_HAJI", "CPM_P_C_NAUSHAD": "CPM_P_C_NAUSHAD", "BJP_DR_KUMARI_SUKUMARAN": "BJP_DR_KUMARI_SUKUMARAN", "SDPI_ABDU_RAHIMAN_P_T_BAPPU": "SDPI_ABDU_RAHIMAN_P_T_BAPPU", "IND_T_K_MAMMUNNI_HAJI": "IND_T_K_MAMMUNNI_HAJI", "BSP_E_P_MADHAVAN": "BSP_E_P_MADHAVAN", "IND_NOUSHAD_P": "IND_NOUSHAD_P", "MUL_P_K_BASHEER": "MUL_P_K_BASHEER", "IND_ANVER_P_V": "IND_ANVER_P_V", "BJP_K_P_BABURAJ_MASTER": "BJP_K_P_BABURAJ_MASTER", "CPI_ASHRAFALI_KALIYATH": "CPI_ASHRAFALI_KALIYATH", "SDPI_P_P_SHOWKATHALI": "SDPI_P_P_SHOWKATHALI", "INC_ARYADAN_MOHAMMED": "INC_ARYADAN_MOHAMMED", "IND_PROFESSOR_M_THOMAS_MATHEW": "IND_PROFESSOR_M_THOMAS_MATHEW", "BJP_K_C_VELAYUDHAN": "BJP_K_C_VELAYUDHAN", "SDPI_C_G_UNNI": "SDPI_C_G_UNNI", "BSP_THARIYAN_KILIYAN": "BSP_THARIYAN_KILIYAN", "IND_THOMAS_MATHEW": "IND_THOMAS_MATHEW", "INC_A_P_ANILKUMAR": "INC_A_P_ANILKUMAR", "CPM_V_RAMESAN": "CPM_V_RAMESAN", "BJP_KOTHERI_AYYAPPAN": "BJP_KOTHERI_AYYAPPAN", "SDPI_KRISHNAN_ERANHIKKAL": "SDPI_KRISHNAN_ERANHIKKAL", "IND_P_ANILKUMAR": "IND_P_ANILKUMAR", "IND_T_C_THEYYAN": "IND_T_C_THEYYAN", "MUL_ADV_M_UMMER": "MUL_ADV_M_UMMER", "CPI_PROF_P_GOURI": "CPI_PROF_P_GOURI", "BJP_P_G_UPENDRAN": "BJP_P_G_UPENDRAN", "SDPI_JALEEL_NEELAMBRA": "SDPI_JALEEL_NEELAMBRA", "IND_FEROZ_BABU_ISHTADANAM": "IND_FEROZ_BABU_ISHTADANAM", "BSP_SHAMSUDHEEN_ASLAMI": "BSP_SHAMSUDHEEN_ASLAMI", "MUL_MANJALAMKUZHI_ALI": "MUL_MANJALAMKUZHI_ALI", "CPM_SASIKUMAR": "CPM_SASIKUMAR", "BJP_C_K_KUNHIMUHAMMED": "BJP_C_K_KUNHIMUHAMMED", "SDPI_SAIDALIKKUTTY_SAEED_MADANI": "SDPI_SAIDALIKKUTTY_SAEED_MADANI", "IND_MOHAMMED_ALI": "IND_MOHAMMED_ALI", "MUL_T_A_AHMED_KABEER": "MUL_T_A_AHMED_KABEER", "CPM_KADEEJA_SATHAR": "CPM_KADEEJA_SATHAR", "BJP_MANIKANDAN_K": "BJP_MANIKANDAN_K", "SDPI_DR_C_H_ASHRAF": "SDPI_DR_C_H_ASHRAF", "IND_ANWAR_BABU": "IND_ANWAR_BABU", "MUL_P_UBAIDULLA": "MUL_P_UBAIDULLA", "JD_S_MADATHIL_SADIKALI": "JD_S_MADATHIL_SADIKALI", "SDPI_ADVOCATE_SADIK_NADUTHODI": "SDPI_ADVOCATE_SADIK_NADUTHODI", "BJP_K_VELAYUDHAN": "BJP_K_VELAYUDHAN", "IND_ABU_THWAHIR": "IND_ABU_THWAHIR", "IND_POOKK_ATTIL_ALI_HAJI": "IND_POOKK_ATTIL_ALI_HAJI", "MUL_P_K_KUNHALIKUTTY": "MUL_P_K_KUNHALIKUTTY", "INL_K_P_ISMAYIL": "INL_K_P_ISMAYIL", "SDPI_ABDUL_MAJEED_FAIZI": "SDPI_ABDUL_MAJEED_FAIZI", "BJP_SUBRAHMANIAN": "BJP_SUBRAHMANIAN", "IND_K_P_ISMAYIL_KALLUPARAMBA_N": "IND_K_P_ISMAYIL_KALLUPARAMBA_N", "IND_KUNHALIKUTTY_K_P": "IND_KUNHALIKUTTY_K_P", "BSP_SAFARUDEEN": "BSP_SAFARUDEEN", "IND_ISMAYIL_K_T": "IND_ISMAYIL_K_T", "MUL_ADV_K_N_A_KHADER": "MUL_ADV_K_N_A_KHADER", "IND_K_V_SANKARANARAYANAN": "IND_K_V_SANKARANARAYANAN", "BJP_PREMAN_MASTER": "BJP_PREMAN_MASTER", "PDP_SALAM_MOONNIYUR": "PDP_SALAM_MOONNIYUR", "SDPI_ABDUL_LATHEEF": "SDPI_ABDUL_LATHEEF", "BSP_NEELAKANTAN_CHELARI": "BSP_NEELAKANTAN_CHELARI", "MUL_P_K_ABDU_RABB": "MUL_P_K_ABDU_RABB", "CPI_ADV_K_K_ABDU_SAMAD": "CPI_ADV_K_K_ABDU_SAMAD", "BJP_SASIDHARAN_PUNNASSERY": "BJP_SASIDHARAN_PUNNASSERY", "PDP_IBRAHIM_THIRURANGADI": "PDP_IBRAHIM_THIRURANGADI", "SDPI_ADV_A_A_RAHIM": "SDPI_ADV_A_A_RAHIM", "BSP_ABUYAZAR": "BSP_ABUYAZAR", "MUL_ABDURAHIMAN_RANDATHANI": "MUL_ABDURAHIMAN_RANDATHANI", "CPM_E_JAYAN": "CPM_E_JAYAN", "BJP_RAVI_THELATH": "BJP_RAVI_THELATH", "SDPI_K_K_MAJEED_KHASIMI": "SDPI_K_K_MAJEED_KHASIMI", "MUL_C_MAMMOOTTY": "MUL_C_MAMMOOTTY", "CPM_P_P_ABDULLAKUTTY": "CPM_P_P_ABDULLAKUTTY", "BJP_P_T_ALI_HAJI": "BJP_P_T_ALI_HAJI", "SDPI_A_K_MAJEED_MASTER": "SDPI_A_K_MAJEED_MASTER", "PDP_ALIKUTTY_ALIAS_BAPPU_PUTHANATHANI": "PDP_ALIKUTTY_ALIAS_BAPPU_PUTHANATHANI", "IND_MOHANDAS": "IND_MOHANDAS", "BSP_T_AYYAPPAN": "BSP_T_AYYAPPAN", "MUL_ABDUSSAMAD_SAMADANI": "MUL_ABDUSSAMAD_SAMADANI", "NCP_DR_C_P_K_GURUKKAL": "NCP_DR_C_P_K_GURUKKAL", "BJP_K_K_SURENDRAN": "BJP_K_K_SURENDRAN", "PDP_ALI_KADAMPUZHA": "PDP_ALI_KADAMPUZHA", "SDPI_ADV_K_C_NASEER": "SDPI_ADV_K_C_NASEER", "IND_KADAMPUZHA_BINDHU_DEVARAJAN": "IND_KADAMPUZHA_BINDHU_DEVARAJAN", "BSP_MADATHIL_MUHAMMAD_ELLIAS": "BSP_MADATHIL_MUHAMMAD_ELLIAS", "IND_DR_K_T_JALEEL": "IND_DR_K_T_JALEEL", "INC_ADV_V_V_PRAKASH": "INC_ADV_V_V_PRAKASH", "BJP_NIRMALA_KUTTIKRISHNAN_PUNNAKKAL": "BJP_NIRMALA_KUTTIKRISHNAN_PUNNAKKAL", "SDPI_NURUL_HACK": "SDPI_NURUL_HACK", "IND_V_V_PRAKASHAN": "IND_V_V_PRAKASHAN", "IND_T_A_JALEEL": "IND_T_A_JALEEL", "IND_T_K_JALEEL": "IND_T_K_JALEEL", "BSP_NANDA_KUMAR": "BSP_NANDA_KUMAR", "CPM_P_SREERAMAKRISHNAN": "CPM_P_SREERAMAKRISHNAN", "INC_P_T_AJAY_MOHAN": "INC_P_T_AJAY_MOHAN", "BJP_V_T_JAYAPRAKASH_MASTER": "BJP_V_T_JAYAPRAKASH_MASTER", "SDPI_YAHIYA_KOYA_THANGAL": "SDPI_YAHIYA_KOYA_THANGAL", "IND_AJAYAN": "IND_AJAYAN", "INC_ADV_V_T_BALRAM": "INC_ADV_V_T_BALRAM", "CPM_MAMMIKUTTY_P": "CPM_MAMMIKUTTY_P", "BJP_V_RAMANKUTTY": "BJP_V_RAMANKUTTY", "SDPI_BABURAJAN_O_T": "SDPI_BABURAJAN_O_T", "IND_P_MAMMIKUTTY": "IND_P_MAMMIKUTTY", "PDP_P_SHAMSUDHEEN": "PDP_P_SHAMSUDHEEN", "BSP_RAMESAN_PERUMANNUR": "BSP_RAMESAN_PERUMANNUR", "IND_K_BALARAMAN": "IND_K_BALARAMAN", "INC_C_P_MOHAMMED": "INC_C_P_MOHAMMED", "CPI_K_P_SURESH_RAJ": "CPI_K_P_SURESH_RAJ", "BJP_POOKKATTIRI_BABU": "BJP_POOKKATTIRI_BABU", "SDPI_ADV_K_M_ASHARAF": "SDPI_ADV_K_M_ASHARAF", "IND_SURESH": "IND_SURESH", "BSP_ASHARAF_ALI_VALLAPPUZHA": "BSP_ASHARAF_ALI_VALLAPPUZHA", "PDP_MASEEF_HAJI": "PDP_MASEEF_HAJI", "CPM_K_S_SALEEKHA": "CPM_K_S_SALEEKHA", "INC_SANTHA_JAYARAM": "INC_SANTHA_JAYARAM", "BJP_V_B_MURALIDHARAN": "BJP_V_B_MURALIDHARAN", "SDPI_KHALID_A": "SDPI_KHALID_A", "BSP_M_C_VELAYUDHAN": "BSP_M_C_VELAYUDHAN", "CPM_M_HAMZA": "CPM_M_HAMZA", "INC_V_K_SREEKANDAN": "INC_V_K_SREEKANDAN", "BJP_P_VENUGOPALAN": "BJP_P_VENUGOPALAN", "SDPI_E_S_KAJAHUSSAIN": "SDPI_E_S_KAJAHUSSAIN", "IND_M_HAMZA": "IND_M_HAMZA", "BSP_K_T_PADMINI": "BSP_K_T_PADMINI", "IND_N_HAMZA": "IND_N_HAMZA", "IND_ARAVINDAN_KARIMPUZHA": "IND_ARAVINDAN_KARIMPUZHA", "CPM_K_V_VIJAYADAS": "CPM_K_V_VIJAYADAS", "INC_P_SWAMINATHAN": "INC_P_SWAMINATHAN", "BJP_V_DEVAYANI": "BJP_V_DEVAYANI", "IND_VIJAYADASAN": "IND_VIJAYADASAN", "BSP_K_VELAYUDHAN": "BSP_K_VELAYUDHAN", "MUL_ADVOCATE_N_SAMSUDHEEN": "MUL_ADVOCATE_N_SAMSUDHEEN", "CPI_V_CHAMUNNI": "CPI_V_CHAMUNNI", "BJP_O_P_VASUDEVANUNNI": "BJP_O_P_VASUDEVANUNNI", "IND_CHAMUNNI": "IND_CHAMUNNI", "SDPI_MUHAMMED_GAFOOR_MADANI": "SDPI_MUHAMMED_GAFOOR_MADANI", "BSP_RAMAKRISHNAN_A": "BSP_RAMAKRISHNAN_A", "CPM_V_S_ACHUTHANANDAN": "CPM_V_S_ACHUTHANANDAN", "INC_LATHIKA_SUBHASH": "INC_LATHIKA_SUBHASH", "JD_U_ADV_P_K_MAJEED_PEDIKKATT": "JD_U_ADV_P_K_MAJEED_PEDIKKATT", "BSP_RAVI_PALLATHERI": "BSP_RAVI_PALLATHERI", "INC_SHAFI_PARAMBIL": "INC_SHAFI_PARAMBIL", "CPM_K_K_DIVAKARAN": "CPM_K_K_DIVAKARAN", "BJP_C_UDAYBHASKAR": "BJP_C_UDAYBHASKAR", "IND_SHAJI_ABRAHAM": "IND_SHAJI_ABRAHAM", "BSP_HARI_ARUMBIL": "BSP_HARI_ARUMBIL", "IND_MUHAMMED_SHAFI_SHAFI_PURAKARA": "IND_MUHAMMED_SHAFI_SHAFI_PURAKARA", "ADMK_C_SAMPATH": "ADMK_C_SAMPATH", "IND_DIVAKARAN": "IND_DIVAKARAN", "CPM_A_K_BALAN": "CPM_A_K_BALAN", "KEC_J_N_VINESH": "KEC_J_N_VINESH", "BJP_M_LAKSHMANAN": "BJP_M_LAKSHMANAN", "BSP_P_C_NARAYANANKUTTY": "BSP_P_C_NARAYANANKUTTY", "IND_K_VINESH": "IND_K_VINESH", "INC_K_ACHUTHAN": "INC_K_ACHUTHAN", "CPM_S_SUBHASH_CHANDRABOSE": "CPM_S_SUBHASH_CHANDRABOSE", "BJP_A_K_OMANAKUTTAN": "BJP_A_K_OMANAKUTTAN", "IND_K_KALADHARAN": "IND_K_KALADHARAN", "SDPI_A_MUHAMED_HANEEFA": "SDPI_A_MUHAMED_HANEEFA", "BSP_V_LAKSHMI": "BSP_V_LAKSHMI", "IND_K_ACHUTHAN": "IND_K_ACHUTHAN", "SUCI_A_RAJEENA": "SUCI_A_RAJEENA", "CPM_V_CHENTHAMARAKSHAN": "CPM_V_CHENTHAMARAKSHAN", "CMPKSC_M_V_RAGHAVAN": "CMPKSC_M_V_RAGHAVAN", "BJP_N_SIVARAJAN": "BJP_N_SIVARAJAN", "SDPI_SAKKEER_HUSSAIN": "SDPI_SAKKEER_HUSSAIN", "BSP_CHANDRAN": "BSP_CHANDRAN", "ADMK_SUGUNAN_S": "ADMK_SUGUNAN_S", "CPI_ML_L_JOY_PETER_T": "CPI_ML_L_JOY_PETER_T", "CPM_M_CHANDRAN": "CPM_M_CHANDRAN", "KEC_M_ADV_K_KUSALA_KUMAR": "KEC_M_ADV_K_KUSALA_KUMAR", "BJP_K_A_SULAIMAN": "BJP_K_A_SULAIMAN", "BSP_P_D_PAULOSE": "BSP_P_D_PAULOSE", "CPM_K_RADHAKRISHNAN": "CPM_K_RADHAKRISHNAN", "INC_K_B_SASIKUMAR": "INC_K_B_SASIKUMAR", "BJP_V_A_KRISHNAKUMARAN": "BJP_V_A_KRISHNAKUMARAN", "SDPI_A_SUBRAHMANIAN": "SDPI_A_SUBRAHMANIAN", "BSP_SURESH_BABU": "BSP_SURESH_BABU", "CPM_BABU_M_PALISSERY": "CPM_BABU_M_PALISSERY", "CMPKSC_C_P_JOHN": "CMPKSC_C_P_JOHN", "BJP_ADV_K_K_ANEESHKUMAR": "BJP_ADV_K_K_ANEESHKUMAR", "IND_K_P_PREMAN": "IND_K_P_PREMAN", "IND_JOHN": "IND_JOHN", "BSP_UNNIKRISHNAN_VAROLI": "BSP_UNNIKRISHNAN_VAROLI", "CPM_K_V_ABDUL_KHADER": "CPM_K_V_ABDUL_KHADER", "MUL_ASHARAF_KOKKUR": "MUL_ASHARAF_KOKKUR", "BJP_DAYANANDAN_MAMPULLY": "BJP_DAYANANDAN_MAMPULLY", "SDPI_ASHARAFVADAKOOT": "SDPI_ASHARAFVADAKOOT", "IND_ADV_SHAMEERBABU": "IND_ADV_SHAMEERBABU", "IND_K_V_ABDULKHADER": "IND_K_V_ABDULKHADER", "IND_VIJAYANATH": "IND_VIJAYANATH", "SUCI_C_V_PREMRAJ": "SUCI_C_V_PREMRAJ", "INC_P_A_MADHAVAN": "INC_P_A_MADHAVAN", "CPM_BABY_JOHN": "CPM_BABY_JOHN", "BJP_P_M_GOPINATHAN": "BJP_P_M_GOPINATHAN", "SDPI_P_K_USMAN": "SDPI_P_K_USMAN", "BSP_SURESH_TACHAPPILLY": "BSP_SURESH_TACHAPPILLY", "KJ_ARAVINDAKSHAN_M_K": "KJ_ARAVINDAKSHAN_M_K", "INC_C_N_BALAKRISHNAN": "INC_C_N_BALAKRISHNAN", "CPM_N_R_BALAN": "CPM_N_R_BALAN", "BJP_SHAJUMON_VATTEKAD": "BJP_SHAJUMON_VATTEKAD", "BSP_GOVINDAN_MACHAD": "BSP_GOVINDAN_MACHAD", "INC_M_P_VINCENT": "INC_M_P_VINCENT", "CPI_RAJAJI_MATHEW_THOMAS": "CPI_RAJAJI_MATHEW_THOMAS", "BJP_SUNDARARAJAN_MASTER": "BJP_SUNDARARAJAN_MASTER", "IND_SURESH_M_R": "IND_SURESH_M_R", "BSP_SUNNY_K_JOHN": "BSP_SUNNY_K_JOHN", "IND_RATHEESH_T_NAIR": "IND_RATHEESH_T_NAIR", "INC_ADV_THERAMBIL_RAMAKRISHNAN": "INC_ADV_THERAMBIL_RAMAKRISHNAN", "CPI_P_BALACHANDRAN": "CPI_P_BALACHANDRAN", "BJP_ADV_RAVIKUMAR_UPPATH": "BJP_ADV_RAVIKUMAR_UPPATH", "IND_THERAMBIL_RAMAKRISHNAN": "IND_THERAMBIL_RAMAKRISHNAN", "BSP_ADV_A_JAYARAM": "BSP_ADV_A_JAYARAM", "CPI_GEETHA_GOPI": "CPI_GEETHA_GOPI", "IND_VIKAS_CHAKRAPANI": "IND_VIKAS_CHAKRAPANI", "BJP_SARJU_THOYAKKAVU": "BJP_SARJU_THOYAKKAVU", "IND_DINESH_KUMAR_E_V": "IND_DINESH_KUMAR_E_V", "IND_M_S_VASANTHY": "IND_M_S_VASANTHY", "BSP_P_K_SUBRAMANIAN": "BSP_P_K_SUBRAMANIAN", "IND_N_V_MANI": "IND_N_V_MANI", "IND_C_K_CHANDRAN": "IND_C_K_CHANDRAN", "IND_PUSHPAKARAN": "IND_PUSHPAKARAN", "CPI_ADV_V_S_SUNILKUMAR": "CPI_ADV_V_S_SUNILKUMAR", "JPSS_UMESH_CHALLIYIL": "JPSS_UMESH_CHALLIYIL", "BJP_A_N_RADHAKRISHNAN": "BJP_A_N_RADHAKRISHNAN", "IND_M_M_MANOJ": "IND_M_M_MANOJ", "BSP_P_A_KUTTAPPAN": "BSP_P_A_KUTTAPPAN", "IND_C_U_NIMI": "IND_C_U_NIMI", "KEC_M_ADV_THOMAS_UNNIYADAN": "KEC_M_ADV_THOMAS_UNNIYADAN", "CPM_ADV_K_R_VIJAYA": "CPM_ADV_K_R_VIJAYA", "BJP_K_C_VENU_MASTER": "BJP_K_C_VENU_MASTER", "IND_T_V_SIVADASAN": "IND_T_V_SIVADASAN", "BSP_SUBRAMANIAN": "BSP_SUBRAMANIAN", "CPM_PROF_C_RAVEENDRANATH": "CPM_PROF_C_RAVEENDRANATH", "INC_ADV_K_P_VISWANATHAN": "INC_ADV_K_P_VISWANATHAN", "BJP_SOBHA_SURENDRAN": "BJP_SOBHA_SURENDRAN", "IND_P_J_MONSY": "IND_P_J_MONSY", "BSP_P_C_PUSHPAKARAN": "BSP_P_C_PUSHPAKARAN", "IND_PAULSON_KALLOOR": "IND_PAULSON_KALLOOR", "IND_K_V_PURUSHOTHAMAN": "IND_K_V_PURUSHOTHAMAN", "CPM_DEVASSY_B_D": "CPM_DEVASSY_B_D", "INC_BENNY_K_T": "INC_BENNY_K_T", "BJP_ADV_SUDHEER_BABY": "BJP_ADV_SUDHEER_BABY", "IND_PUSHPANGADAN_P_M": "IND_PUSHPANGADAN_P_M", "BSP_SUBRAMANIAN_V_K": "BSP_SUBRAMANIAN_V_K", "IND_JAYAKUMAR_E": "IND_JAYAKUMAR_E", "INC_T_N_PRATHAPAN": "INC_T_N_PRATHAPAN", "CPI_K_G_SIVANANDHAN": "CPI_K_G_SIVANANDHAN", "BJP_I_R_VIJAYAN": "BJP_I_R_VIJAYAN", "BSP_AMBILY_UNNIKRISHNAN": "BSP_AMBILY_UNNIKRISHNAN", "IND_HARIDAS_K_B": "IND_HARIDAS_K_B", "IND_RAJESH_APPATT": "IND_RAJESH_APPATT", "IND_ALLY_RAVI": "IND_ALLY_RAVI", "SUCI_SUJA_ANTONY": "SUCI_SUJA_ANTONY", "IND_T_U_RADHAKRISHNAN": "IND_T_U_RADHAKRISHNAN", "CPM_SAJU_PAUL": "CPM_SAJU_PAUL", "INC_ADV_JAISON_JOSEPH": "INC_ADV_JAISON_JOSEPH", "BJP_O_C_ASOKAN": "BJP_O_C_ASOKAN", "SDPI_O_ALIYAR": "SDPI_O_ALIYAR", "PDP_N_K_MUHAMMED_HAJI": "PDP_N_K_MUHAMMED_HAJI", "SHS_P_N_SUNILKUMAR": "SHS_P_N_SUNILKUMAR", "CPI_ML_L_BINDU_JAYAN": "CPI_ML_L_BINDU_JAYAN", "JD_S_ADVOCATE_JOSE_THETTAYIL": "JD_S_ADVOCATE_JOSE_THETTAYIL", "KEC_J_ADVOCATE_JOHNY_NELLOOR": "KEC_J_ADVOCATE_JOHNY_NELLOOR", "BJP_M_A_BRAHMARAJ": "BJP_M_A_BRAHMARAJ", "IND_JOHNSON_I_T_INCHAKADAN_JOHNY": "IND_JOHNSON_I_T_INCHAKADAN_JOHNY", "BSP_M_G_PURUSHOTHAMAN": "BSP_M_G_PURUSHOTHAMAN", "KJ_POULOSE_KIDANGEN": "KJ_POULOSE_KIDANGEN", "SUCI_K_C_JAYAN": "SUCI_K_C_JAYAN", "SWJP_FRANCIS_NJALIYAN": "SWJP_FRANCIS_NJALIYAN", "IND_JOHNSON": "IND_JOHNSON", "IND_JOHN_CHACKO": "IND_JOHN_CHACKO", "INC_ANWAR_SADATH": "INC_ANWAR_SADATH", "CPM_A_M_YOUSAF": "CPM_A_M_YOUSAF", "BJP_M_N_GOPI": "BJP_M_N_GOPI", "SDPI_ROY_ARACKAL": "SDPI_ROY_ARACKAL", "IND_M_M_YOOSAF_MUNDAKKAL": "IND_M_M_YOOSAF_MUNDAKKAL", "IND_ANWAR_SADATH_PANACKAPARAMBIL": "IND_ANWAR_SADATH_PANACKAPARAMBIL", "SHS_K_Y_KUNJUMON": "SHS_K_Y_KUNJUMON", "BSP_ABDUL_AZEEZ": "BSP_ABDUL_AZEEZ", "IND_ANTONY_JOSEPH_MANJOORAN": "IND_ANTONY_JOSEPH_MANJOORAN", "SUCI_K_K_SOBHA": "SUCI_K_K_SOBHA", "MUL_V_K_EBRAHIM_KUNJU": "MUL_V_K_EBRAHIM_KUNJU", "CPM_K_CHANDRAN_PILLAI": "CPM_K_CHANDRAN_PILLAI", "BJP_ADV_P_KRISHNADAS": "BJP_ADV_P_KRISHNADAS", "SDPI_P_A_MUHAMMED_ASLAM": "SDPI_P_A_MUHAMMED_ASLAM", "IND_T_A_MUJEEB_RAHMAN": "IND_T_A_MUJEEB_RAHMAN", "IND_CHANDRASEKHARA_PILLAI": "IND_CHANDRASEKHARA_PILLAI", "BSP_GIREESH_BABU_G": "BSP_GIREESH_BABU_G", "IND_SHIBU_THATTAMPADI": "IND_SHIBU_THATTAMPADI", "ADMK_D_SUNDARA_MOORTHY": "ADMK_D_SUNDARA_MOORTHY", "IND_K_P_MOHANAN": "IND_K_P_MOHANAN", "INC_ADV_V_D_SATHEESAN": "INC_ADV_V_D_SATHEESAN", "CPI_PANNIAN_RAVEEDNRAN": "CPI_PANNIAN_RAVEEDNRAN", "BJP_E_S_PURUSHOTHAMAN": "BJP_E_S_PURUSHOTHAMAN", "IND_K_K_JYOTHIVAS": "IND_K_K_JYOTHIVAS", "IND_P_S_RAJENDRA_PRASAD": "IND_P_S_RAJENDRA_PRASAD", "IND_P_P_RAVEENDRAN": "IND_P_P_RAVEENDRAN", "BSP_M_MANOJ": "BSP_M_MANOJ", "CPM_S_SARMA": "CPM_S_SARMA", "INC_AJAY_THARAYIL": "INC_AJAY_THARAYIL", "BJP_T_G_SURENDRAN": "BJP_T_G_SURENDRAN", "BSP_T_K_SIVANANDAN": "BSP_T_K_SIVANANDAN", "IND_SANTHOSH_SARMA": "IND_SANTHOSH_SARMA", "IND_BENNY_JOSEPH": "IND_BENNY_JOSEPH", "INC_DOMINIC_PRESENTATION": "INC_DOMINIC_PRESENTATION", "CPM_M_C_JOSEPHINE": "CPM_M_C_JOSEPHINE", "BJP_K_SASIDHARAN_MASTER": "BJP_K_SASIDHARAN_MASTER", "SDPI_YOOSUF_MUFTHI": "SDPI_YOOSUF_MUFTHI", "IND_DOMINIC_C_J": "IND_DOMINIC_C_J", "BSP_KAMARUDHEEN_T_A": "BSP_KAMARUDHEEN_T_A", "IND_A_P_IBRAHIM_KUTTY": "IND_A_P_IBRAHIM_KUTTY", "IND_ADV_JACOB_PULIKKAN": "IND_ADV_JACOB_PULIKKAN", "IND_T_A_KRISHNAN_KUTTY": "IND_T_A_KRISHNAN_KUTTY", "INC_K_BABU": "INC_K_BABU", "CPM_C_M_DINESH_MANI": "CPM_C_M_DINESH_MANI", "BJP_ADV_SABU_VARGHEESE": "BJP_ADV_SABU_VARGHEESE", "BSP_KARTIKEYAN": "BSP_KARTIKEYAN", "IND_BABU_KEEZHATHUPARAMBU": "IND_BABU_KEEZHATHUPARAMBU", "IND_SAJU_KOLATTUKUDY": "IND_SAJU_KOLATTUKUDY", "SHS_SAJI_THURUTHIKUNNEL": "SHS_SAJI_THURUTHIKUNNEL", "IND_P_K_THANKAMANI": "IND_P_K_THANKAMANI", "IND_K_P_AYYAPPAN": "IND_K_P_AYYAPPAN", "INC_HIBI_EDEN": "INC_HIBI_EDEN", "IND_DR_SEBASTIAN_PAUL": "IND_DR_SEBASTIAN_PAUL", "BJP_C_G_RAJAGOPAL": "BJP_C_G_RAJAGOPAL", "IND_SEBASTIAN_NJALAMKUNNEL": "IND_SEBASTIAN_NJALAMKUNNEL", "BSP_IQBAL_THAMARASSERY": "BSP_IQBAL_THAMARASSERY", "SHS_T_R_VASUDEVAN": "SHS_T_R_VASUDEVAN", "INC_BENNY_BEHANAN": "INC_BENNY_BEHANAN", "CPM_M_E_HASSAINAR": "CPM_M_E_HASSAINAR", "BJP_N_SAJI_KUMAR": "BJP_N_SAJI_KUMAR", "IND_HASSAINAR": "IND_HASSAINAR", "SDPI_ABDUL_SALAM_PARAKKADAN": "SDPI_ABDUL_SALAM_PARAKKADAN", "IND_BENNY_GEORGE": "IND_BENNY_GEORGE", "BSP_SHEREEF_THANKAYATHIL": "BSP_SHEREEF_THANKAYATHIL", "INC_V_P_SAJEENDRAN": "INC_V_P_SAJEENDRAN", "CPM_M_A_SURENDRAN": "CPM_M_A_SURENDRAN", "BJP_M_RAVI": "BJP_M_RAVI", "SDPI_M_K_MANOJ_KUMAR": "SDPI_M_K_MANOJ_KUMAR", "BSP_RAJEEV_P_T": "BSP_RAJEEV_P_T", "KEC_J_T_M_JACOB": "KEC_J_T_M_JACOB", "CPM_M_J_JACOB": "CPM_M_J_JACOB", "BJP_M_N_MADHU": "BJP_M_N_MADHU", "BSP_JOSHY_JOSEPH": "BSP_JOSHY_JOSEPH", "IND_SABU_KUNJAPPAN": "IND_SABU_KUNJAPPAN", "SUCI_M_K_USHA": "SUCI_M_K_USHA", "INC_JOSEPH_VAZHACKKAN": "INC_JOSEPH_VAZHACKKAN", "CPI_BABU_PAUL": "CPI_BABU_PAUL", "BJP_JIJI_JOSEPH": "BJP_JIJI_JOSEPH", "IND_BIJU_SREEDHARAN": "IND_BIJU_SREEDHARAN", "BSP_BOBY_KALLOOR": "BSP_BOBY_KALLOOR", "KEC_M_SHEV_T_U_KURUVILLA": "KEC_M_SHEV_T_U_KURUVILLA", "IND_COMMANDER_SKARIAH_THOMAS": "IND_COMMANDER_SKARIAH_THOMAS", "BJP_ADV_K_RADHAKRISHNAN": "BJP_ADV_K_RADHAKRISHNAN", "SDPI_SHINE_MUHAMMED": "SDPI_SHINE_MUHAMMED", "IND_SKARIA_THOMAS": "IND_SKARIA_THOMAS", "IND_T_T_KURUVILA": "IND_T_T_KURUVILA", "IND_DEVAKI_NARAYANAN": "IND_DEVAKI_NARAYANAN", "IND_JOY_DAVASIA": "IND_JOY_DAVASIA", "IND_SKARIA_THOMMAN": "IND_SKARIA_THOMMAN", "BSP_SOMINI_PRABHAKARAN": "BSP_SOMINI_PRABHAKARAN", "CPM_S_RAJENDRAN": "CPM_S_RAJENDRAN", "INC_A_K_MONI": "INC_A_K_MONI", "BJP_S_RAJAGOPAL": "BJP_S_RAJAGOPAL", "IND_SELVARAJ_MADASWAMI": "IND_SELVARAJ_MADASWAMI", "BSP_T_C_THANKAPPAN": "BSP_T_C_THANKAPPAN", "ADMK_MALLIKA": "ADMK_MALLIKA", "SDPI_RAJU_AYYAPPAN": "SDPI_RAJU_AYYAPPAN", "IND_P_K_MANI": "IND_P_K_MANI", "IND_MANIKANDAN_K": "IND_MANIKANDAN_K", "CPM_K_K_JAYACHANDRAN": "CPM_K_K_JAYACHANDRAN", "INC_ADV_JOSSY_SEBASTIAN": "INC_ADV_JOSSY_SEBASTIAN", "BJP_NARAYANA_RAJU": "BJP_NARAYANA_RAJU", "SDPI_MUHAMMED_SHARAFUDHEEN": "SDPI_MUHAMMED_SHARAFUDHEEN", "BSP_BENNY_THOMAS": "BSP_BENNY_THOMAS", "IND_K_C_MAMMACHAN": "IND_K_C_MAMMACHAN", "KEC_M_P_J_JOSEPH": "KEC_M_P_J_JOSEPH", "IND_PROF_JOSEPH_AUGUSTINE": "IND_PROF_JOSEPH_AUGUSTINE", "BJP_P_M_VELAYUDHAN": "BJP_P_M_VELAYUDHAN", "SDPI_M_A_NAJEEB": "SDPI_M_A_NAJEEB", "BSP_BINU_SEBASTIAN": "BSP_BINU_SEBASTIAN", "IND_C_R_DILEEP_KUMAR": "IND_C_R_DILEEP_KUMAR", "IND_T_S_SREENIVASAN": "IND_T_S_SREENIVASAN", "IND_JOMON_JOHN": "IND_JOMON_JOHN", "SUCI_SIBY_C_MATHEW": "SUCI_SIBY_C_MATHEW", "KJ_SHIBU_MON": "KJ_SHIBU_MON", "KEC_M_ROSHY_AUGUSTINE": "KEC_M_ROSHY_AUGUSTINE", "CPM_C_V_VARGHESE": "CPM_C_V_VARGHESE", "BJP_C_C_KRISHNAN": "BJP_C_C_KRISHNAN", "IND_KANCHIYAR_PEETHAMBARAN": "IND_KANCHIYAR_PEETHAMBARAN", "IND_P_C_PRABHAKARAN": "IND_P_C_PRABHAKARAN", "IND_M_K_NARAYANAN": "IND_M_K_NARAYANAN", "IND_V_LAKSHMANAN": "IND_V_LAKSHMANAN", "CPI_E_S_BIJIMOL": "CPI_E_S_BIJIMOL", "INC_ADV_E_M_AUGUSTHY": "INC_ADV_E_M_AUGUSTHY", "BJP_P_P_SANU": "BJP_P_P_SANU", "IND_M_K_SUPPU_ROYAL": "IND_M_K_SUPPU_ROYAL", "IND_K_D_VASUDEVAN": "IND_K_D_VASUDEVAN", "BSP_BIJU_MATTAPPALLY": "BSP_BIJU_MATTAPPALLY", "SDPI_P_S_MADHU": "SDPI_P_S_MADHU", "IND_AUGUSTHY_M": "IND_AUGUSTHY_M", "IND_JOSEPH_JACOB": "IND_JOSEPH_JACOB", "KEC_M_K_M_MANI": "KEC_M_K_M_MANI", "NCP_MANI_C_KAPPEN": "NCP_MANI_C_KAPPEN", "BJP_PROF_B_VIJAYAKUMAR": "BJP_PROF_B_VIJAYAKUMAR", "IND_C_V_JOHN": "IND_C_V_JOHN", "IND_JAMES_JOSEPH": "IND_JAMES_JOSEPH", "KEC_M_ADV_MONS_JOSEPH": "KEC_M_ADV_MONS_JOSEPH", "KC_AMG_STEPHEN_GEORGE": "KC_AMG_STEPHEN_GEORGE", "BJP_P_G_BIJUKUMAR": "BJP_P_G_BIJUKUMAR", "BSP_M_D_THOMAS": "BSP_M_D_THOMAS", "CPI_K_AJITH": "CPI_K_AJITH", "INC_A_SANEESHKUMAR": "INC_A_SANEESHKUMAR", "BJP_RAMESH_KAVIMATTAM": "BJP_RAMESH_KAVIMATTAM", "IND_K_SANESH": "IND_K_SANESH", "BSP_P_K_PRAKASAN": "BSP_P_K_PRAKASAN", "SUCI_K_S_SASIKALA": "SUCI_K_S_SASIKALA", "IND_M_K_DASAN": "IND_M_K_DASAN", "CPM_ADV_K_SURESH_KURUP": "CPM_ADV_K_SURESH_KURUP", "KEC_M_THOMAS_CHAZHIKADAN": "KEC_M_THOMAS_CHAZHIKADAN", "BJP_V_G_GOPAKUMAR": "BJP_V_G_GOPAKUMAR", "BSP_K_T_THOMAS": "BSP_K_T_THOMAS", "IND_JUSTIN_MATHEW": "IND_JUSTIN_MATHEW", "SUCI_E_V_PRAKASH": "SUCI_E_V_PRAKASH", "IND_ANISH_KUMAR": "IND_ANISH_KUMAR", "INC_THIRUVANCHOOR_RADHAKRISHNAN": "INC_THIRUVANCHOOR_RADHAKRISHNAN", "CPM_V_N_VASAVAN": "CPM_V_N_VASAVAN", "BJP_ADV_NARAYANAN_NAMBOOTHIRI": "BJP_ADV_NARAYANAN_NAMBOOTHIRI", "BSP_V_S_SHAJAN": "BSP_V_S_SHAJAN", "IND_RAJEEV_ABRAHAM": "IND_RAJEEV_ABRAHAM", "SUCI_N_K_BIJU": "SUCI_N_K_BIJU", "IND_GEORGE_P_ELIAS": "IND_GEORGE_P_ELIAS", "INC_OOMMEN_CHANDY": "INC_OOMMEN_CHANDY", "CPM_SUJA_SUSAN_GEORGE": "CPM_SUJA_SUSAN_GEORGE", "BJP_P_SUNILKUMAR": "BJP_P_SUNILKUMAR", "BSP_ADV_SAJI_K_CHERAMAN": "BSP_ADV_SAJI_K_CHERAMAN", "IND_ADV_JAYAKUMAR_KAVUNKAL": "IND_ADV_JAYAKUMAR_KAVUNKAL", "KEC_M_C_F_THOMAS": "KEC_M_C_F_THOMAS", "CPM_DR_B_EKBAL": "CPM_DR_B_EKBAL", "BJP_M_B_RAJAGOPAL": "BJP_M_B_RAJAGOPAL", "BSP_MATHEWS_JOHN": "BSP_MATHEWS_JOHN", "SDPI_MANSOOR": "SDPI_MANSOOR", "SUCI_K_SADANANDAN": "SUCI_K_SADANANDAN", "IND_NASEER_K_M": "IND_NASEER_K_M", "KEC_M_DR_N_JAYARAJ": "KEC_M_DR_N_JAYARAJ", "CPI_ADV_SURESH_T_NAIR": "CPI_ADV_SURESH_T_NAIR", "BJP_RAJAMOHAN": "BJP_RAJAMOHAN", "BSP_ADV_P_K_GEETHA_KRISHNAN": "BSP_ADV_P_K_GEETHA_KRISHNAN", "KEC_M_P_C_GEORGE_PLATHOTTAM": "KEC_M_P_C_GEORGE_PLATHOTTAM", "IND_ADV_MOHAN_THOMAS": "IND_ADV_MOHAN_THOMAS", "BJP_K_M_SANTHOSHKUMAR": "BJP_K_M_SANTHOSHKUMAR", "SDPI_V_M_SULAIMAN_MOULAVI": "SDPI_V_M_SULAIMAN_MOULAVI", "BSP_P_P_JOSHY": "BSP_P_P_JOSHY", "IND_SIVAN": "IND_SIVAN", "IND_P_K_DIVAKARAN": "IND_P_K_DIVAKARAN", "IND_P_C_GEROGE_PONNATTU_PUTHENPURAYIL": "IND_P_C_GEROGE_PONNATTU_PUTHENPURAYIL", "IND_K_RAJAPPAN": "IND_K_RAJAPPAN", "SUCI_RAJU_VATTAPPARA": "SUCI_RAJU_VATTAPPARA", "IND_MANO_GEORGE": "IND_MANO_GEORGE", "IND_ANOOP_BHASKARAN": "IND_ANOOP_BHASKARAN", "IND_ANIL_MATHEW": "IND_ANIL_MATHEW", "CPM_ADV_AM_ARIFF": "CPM_ADV_AM_ARIFF", "INC_A_A_SHUKOOR": "INC_A_A_SHUKOOR", "BJP_T_SAJEEV_LAL": "BJP_T_SAJEEV_LAL", "BSP_V_LENIN": "BSP_V_LENIN", "IND_SURESH_BABU": "IND_SURESH_BABU", "SDPI_JAYAPRAKASH": "SDPI_JAYAPRAKASH", "IND_S_SARATH": "IND_S_SARATH", "IND_ADV_P_T_RADHAKRISHNAN": "IND_ADV_P_T_RADHAKRISHNAN", "CPI_P_THILOTHAMAN": "CPI_P_THILOTHAMAN", "JPSS_K_R_GOURIAMMA": "JPSS_K_R_GOURIAMMA", "BJP_ADV_P_K_BINOY": "BJP_ADV_P_K_BINOY", "BSP_K_R_RAJEEVAN": "BSP_K_R_RAJEEVAN", "IND_SHAJIMON": "IND_SHAJIMON", "CPM_DR_T_M_THOMAS_ISAAC": "CPM_DR_T_M_THOMAS_ISAAC", "INC_ADV_P_J_MATHEW": "INC_ADV_P_J_MATHEW", "BJP_KOTTARAM_UNNIKRISHNAN": "BJP_KOTTARAM_UNNIKRISHNAN", "SDPI_T_M_SAMAD": "SDPI_T_M_SAMAD", "IND_SEBASTIAN": "IND_SEBASTIAN", "BSP_C_P_THILAKAN": "BSP_C_P_THILAKAN", "CPM_G_SUDHAKARAN": "CPM_G_SUDHAKARAN", "INC_ADV_M_LIJU": "INC_ADV_M_LIJU", "BJP_P_K_VASUDEVAN": "BJP_P_K_VASUDEVAN", "SDPI_S_H_ALHADHI": "SDPI_S_H_ALHADHI", "BSP_OMANAKUTTAN": "BSP_OMANAKUTTAN", "SUCI_K_R_SASI": "SUCI_K_R_SASI", "IND_SIVAKUMAR": "IND_SIVAKUMAR", "IND_NAZEER_AHAMMED": "IND_NAZEER_AHAMMED", "NCP_THOMAS_CHANDY": "NCP_THOMAS_CHANDY", "KEC_M_DR_K_C_JOSEPH": "KEC_M_DR_K_C_JOSEPH", "BJP_K_SOMAN": "BJP_K_SOMAN", "BSP_SHIBU_VADAKKETTOM": "BSP_SHIBU_VADAKKETTOM", "SUCI_P_R_SATHEESAN": "SUCI_P_R_SATHEESAN", "IND_ASOK_KUMAR": "IND_ASOK_KUMAR", "INC_RAMESH_CHENNITHALA": "INC_RAMESH_CHENNITHALA", "CPI_G_KRISHNAPRASAD": "CPI_G_KRISHNAPRASAD", "BJP_ADV_AJITH_SANKAR": "BJP_ADV_AJITH_SANKAR", "IND_RAMESHAN": "IND_RAMESHAN", "BSP_SOMALAL_BABU": "BSP_SOMALAL_BABU", "IND_KRISHNAPRASAD": "IND_KRISHNAPRASAD", "SDPI_VENU": "SDPI_VENU", "SUCI_K_J_SHEELA": "SUCI_K_J_SHEELA", "IND_BIJU_J": "IND_BIJU_J", "IND_N_DIVAKARAN": "IND_N_DIVAKARAN", "CPM_C_K_SADASIVAN": "CPM_C_K_SADASIVAN", "INC_M_MURALI": "INC_M_MURALI", "BJP_ADV_T_O_NOUSHAD": "BJP_ADV_T_O_NOUSHAD", "IND_K_SADASIVAN": "IND_K_SADASIVAN", "IND_MURALI": "IND_MURALI", "BSP_AMBUJAN": "BSP_AMBUJAN", "IND_SHAL_MOHAN": "IND_SHAL_MOHAN", "IND_KALESH_MANIMANDIRAM": "IND_KALESH_MANIMANDIRAM", "CPM_R_RAJESH": "CPM_R_RAJESH", "JPSS_K_K_SHAJU": "JPSS_K_K_SHAJU", "BJP_S_GIRIJA": "BJP_S_GIRIJA", "IND_R_RAJEESH": "IND_R_RAJEESH", "BSP_SUBHASH_MANKAMKUZHY": "BSP_SUBHASH_MANKAMKUZHY", "INC_P_C_VISHNUNATH": "INC_P_C_VISHNUNATH", "CPM_ADV_C_S_SUJATHA": "CPM_ADV_C_S_SUJATHA", "BJP_B_RADHAKRISHNA_MENON": "BJP_B_RADHAKRISHNA_MENON", "IND_SURENDRAN_KARIPPUZHA": "IND_SURENDRAN_KARIPPUZHA", "SUCI_V_VENUGOPAL": "SUCI_V_VENUGOPAL", "JD_S_ADV_MATHEW_T_THOMAS": "JD_S_ADV_MATHEW_T_THOMAS", "KEC_M_VICTOR_T_THOMAS": "KEC_M_VICTOR_T_THOMAS", "BJP_RAJAN_MOOLAVEETTIL": "BJP_RAJAN_MOOLAVEETTIL", "BSP_ADV_KURIAN_JOSEPH": "BSP_ADV_KURIAN_JOSEPH", "SUCI_RADHAMANI_S": "SUCI_RADHAMANI_S", "IND_KATHIKAN_NIRANAM_RAJAN": "IND_KATHIKAN_NIRANAM_RAJAN", "IND_ADV_P_K_SUKUMARAN": "IND_ADV_P_K_SUKUMARAN", "SDPI_SAM_KUTTY_JACOB": "SDPI_SAM_KUTTY_JACOB", "CPM_RAJU_ABRHAM": "CPM_RAJU_ABRHAM", "INC_PEELIPOSE_THOMAS": "INC_PEELIPOSE_THOMAS", "BJP_SURESH_KADAMBARI": "BJP_SURESH_KADAMBARI", "BSP_V_D_SAJI_MON": "BSP_V_D_SAJI_MON", "SDPI_ADV_IBRAHIM_KUTTTY": "SDPI_ADV_IBRAHIM_KUTTTY", "IND_S_RADHAKRISHNAN": "IND_S_RADHAKRISHNAN", "IND_ULAKAN_THEVAN": "IND_ULAKAN_THEVAN", "INC_ADV_K_SIVADASAN_NAIR": "INC_ADV_K_SIVADASAN_NAIR", "CPM_K_C_RAJAGOPALAN": "CPM_K_C_RAJAGOPALAN", "BJP_ADV_K_HARIDAS": "BJP_ADV_K_HARIDAS", "BSP_AMRUTHAKUMAR_T": "BSP_AMRUTHAKUMAR_T", "SDPI_NAZURUDHEEN": "SDPI_NAZURUDHEEN", "IND_SUGATHAN_R": "IND_SUGATHAN_R", "IND_D_SIVADASAN_ACHARI": "IND_D_SIVADASAN_ACHARI", "IND_MADHU_G": "IND_MADHU_G", "SLAP_ADV_K_V_VARGHESE": "SLAP_ADV_K_V_VARGHESE", "IND_PUSHPANGADAN": "IND_PUSHPANGADAN", "INC_ADV_ADOOR_PRAKASH": "INC_ADV_ADOOR_PRAKASH", "CPM_M_S_RAJENDRAN": "CPM_M_S_RAJENDRAN", "BJP_V_S_HARISH_CHANDRAN": "BJP_V_S_HARISH_CHANDRAN", "IND_SINTO_STEPHEN": "IND_SINTO_STEPHEN", "IND_THATTAYIL_SARASWATHI": "IND_THATTAYIL_SARASWATHI", "SUCI_LEKSHMI_R_SEKHAR": "SUCI_LEKSHMI_R_SEKHAR", "IND_RENJINI_C_T": "IND_RENJINI_C_T", "CPI_CHITTAYAM_GOPAKUMAR": "CPI_CHITTAYAM_GOPAKUMAR", "INC_PANDALAM_SUDHAKARAN": "INC_PANDALAM_SUDHAKARAN", "BJP_K_K_SASI": "BJP_K_K_SASI", "IND_OLIKKULANGARA_SURENDRAN": "IND_OLIKKULANGARA_SURENDRAN", "BSP_KODUMON_RAMACHANDRAN": "BSP_KODUMON_RAMACHANDRAN", "IND_PIRAVANTHOOR_SREEDHARAN": "IND_PIRAVANTHOOR_SREEDHARAN", "IND_REMANAN": "IND_REMANAN", "IND_ANIL_K": "IND_ANIL_K", "CPI_C_DIVAKARAN": "CPI_C_DIVAKARAN", "JPSS_ADV_A_N_RAJANBABU": "JPSS_ADV_A_N_RAJANBABU", "SDPI_NAZARUDHEEN_ELAMARAM": "SDPI_NAZARUDHEEN_ELAMARAM", "BJP_MALUMEL_SURESH": "BJP_MALUMEL_SURESH", "IND_P_D_SUDHEER": "IND_P_D_SUDHEER", "SUCI_TWINKLE_PRABHAKARAN": "SUCI_TWINKLE_PRABHAKARAN", "KRSP_SHIBU_BABY_JOHN": "KRSP_SHIBU_BABY_JOHN", "RSP_N_K_PREMACHANDRAN": "RSP_N_K_PREMACHANDRAN", "BJP_NALINI_SANKARAMANGALAM": "BJP_NALINI_SANKARAMANGALAM", "IND_MANIYAN_G": "IND_MANIYAN_G", "BSP_V_VARADHARAJAN": "BSP_V_VARADHARAJAN", "RSP_KOVOOR_KUNJUMON": "RSP_KOVOOR_KUNJUMON", "INC_P_K_RAVI": "INC_P_K_RAVI", "BJP_RAJI_PRASAD": "BJP_RAJI_PRASAD", "SDPI_THULASEEDHARAN_PALLIKKAL": "SDPI_THULASEEDHARAN_PALLIKKAL", "IND_ADV_VALLIKUNNAM_PRASAD": "IND_ADV_VALLIKUNNAM_PRASAD", "BSP_PULIKUZHY_BALACHANDRAN": "BSP_PULIKUZHY_BALACHANDRAN", "IND_SHYLAJA_P": "IND_SHYLAJA_P", "IND_RAVI": "IND_RAVI", "IND_V_REMADEVI": "IND_V_REMADEVI", "CPM_ADV_P_AISHA_POTTY": "CPM_ADV_P_AISHA_POTTY", "KEC_B_DR_N_N_MURALI": "KEC_B_DR_N_N_MURALI", "BJP_VAYAKKAL_MADHU": "BJP_VAYAKKAL_MADHU", "IND_DHANESHLAL_PANAVELY": "IND_DHANESHLAL_PANAVELY", "BSP_P_T_PRASANNA_KUMAR": "BSP_P_T_PRASANNA_KUMAR", "IND_S_SOLOMON": "IND_S_SOLOMON", "IND_PRAKASH_V": "IND_PRAKASH_V", "IND_PRAKASH_R": "IND_PRAKASH_R", "KEC_B_K_B_GANESH_KUMAR": "KEC_B_K_B_GANESH_KUMAR", "CPM_K_RAJAGOPAL": "CPM_K_RAJAGOPAL", "BJP_R_SUBHASH_PATTAZHY": "BJP_R_SUBHASH_PATTAZHY", "IND_ANEESH_ANTONY": "IND_ANEESH_ANTONY", "BSP_PUNALUR_SALIM": "BSP_PUNALUR_SALIM", "IND_N_SUNILKUMAR": "IND_N_SUNILKUMAR", "CPI_ADV_K_RAJU": "CPI_ADV_K_RAJU", "INC_ADV_JOHNSON_ABRAHAM": "INC_ADV_JOHNSON_ABRAHAM", "BJP_B_RADHAMANI": "BJP_B_RADHAMANI", "IND_S_JAYAKUMAR": "IND_S_JAYAKUMAR", "BSP_KUZHICHAYIL_SUNIL": "BSP_KUZHICHAYIL_SUNIL", "SUCI_S_SHAILAJA": "SUCI_S_SHAILAJA", "CPI_MULLAKKARA_RATNAKARAN": "CPI_MULLAKKARA_RATNAKARAN", "INC_SHAHIDA_KAMAL": "INC_SHAHIDA_KAMAL", "BJP_T_C_SAJU_KUMAR": "BJP_T_C_SAJU_KUMAR", "SDPI_JALEEL_KADAKKAL": "SDPI_JALEEL_KADAKKAL", "IND_SHIBU_K_CHADAYAMANGALAM": "IND_SHIBU_K_CHADAYAMANGALAM", "BSP_KOOTTUKKAL_PRASAD": "BSP_KOOTTUKKAL_PRASAD", "IND_OYOOR_NAZEER": "IND_OYOOR_NAZEER", "CPM_M_A_BABY": "CPM_M_A_BABY", "INC_ADV_P_JERMIAS": "INC_ADV_P_JERMIAS", "BJP_VELLIMON_DILEEP": "BJP_VELLIMON_DILEEP", "IND_SANDHYA_PALLIMON": "IND_SANDHYA_PALLIMON", "BSP_SUSEELA_MOHAN": "BSP_SUSEELA_MOHAN", "SUCI_ANTONY_VINCENT": "SUCI_ANTONY_VINCENT", "CPM_P_K_GURUDASAN": "CPM_P_K_GURUDASAN", "INC_K_C_RAJAN": "INC_K_C_RAJAN", "BJP_G_HARI": "BJP_G_HARI", "SDPI_A_A_SHAFI": "SDPI_A_A_SHAFI", "BSP_MANGAD_THULASEEDHARAN": "BSP_MANGAD_THULASEEDHARAN", "IND_SANU_K": "IND_SANU_K", "IND_C_N_NARAYANAN_NAIR": "IND_C_N_NARAYANAN_NAIR", "IND_V_MOHANAN": "IND_V_MOHANAN", "RSP_A_A_AZEEZ": "RSP_A_A_AZEEZ", "MUL_P_K_K_BAVA": "MUL_P_K_K_BAVA", "BJP_PATTATHANAM_BABU": "BJP_PATTATHANAM_BABU", "IND_MYLAKKAD_SHAH": "IND_MYLAKKAD_SHAH", "BSP_SUSHAMA_VIJAYAN": "BSP_SUSHAMA_VIJAYAN", "IND_ABDUL_AZEEZ": "IND_ABDUL_AZEEZ", "IND_SAIJU_V": "IND_SAIJU_V", "IND_DEEPU_N": "IND_DEEPU_N", "CPI_G_S_JAYALAL": "CPI_G_S_JAYALAL", "INC_ADV_BINDU_KRISHNA": "INC_ADV_BINDU_KRISHNA", "BJP_ADV_KIZHAKKANELA_SUDHAKARAN": "BJP_ADV_KIZHAKKANELA_SUDHAKARAN", "IND_A_SASI": "IND_A_SASI", "IND_JAYALAL": "IND_JAYALAL", "BSP_MAILODE_SUDHAN": "BSP_MAILODE_SUDHAN", "SHS_SASIKUMAR": "SHS_SASIKUMAR", "INC_VARKALA_KAHAR": "INC_VARKALA_KAHAR", "CPM_A_A_RAHIM": "CPM_A_A_RAHIM", "BJP_ELAKAMAN_SATHEESAN": "BJP_ELAKAMAN_SATHEESAN", "IND_CHERUNNIYOOR_GANESH": "IND_CHERUNNIYOOR_GANESH", "SDPI_KUNNIL_SHAJAHAN": "SDPI_KUNNIL_SHAJAHAN", "IND_ANEESH_KUMAR": "IND_ANEESH_KUMAR", "CPM_ADVOCATE_B_SATYAN": "CPM_ADVOCATE_B_SATYAN", "INC_THANKAMONY_DIVAKARAN": "INC_THANKAMONY_DIVAKARAN", "IND_ATTINGAL_SURESH": "IND_ATTINGAL_SURESH", "BJP_DR_P_P_VAVA": "BJP_DR_P_P_VAVA", "IND_V_V_SELVARAJ": "IND_V_V_SELVARAJ", "SDPI_K_G_SOMAN": "SDPI_K_G_SOMAN", "BSP_DR_M_CHINNAMMA": "BSP_DR_M_CHINNAMMA", "IND_G_ANIRUDHAN": "IND_G_ANIRUDHAN", "CPI_V_SASI": "CPI_V_SASI", "INC_K_VIDYADHARAN": "INC_K_VIDYADHARAN", "IND_AYTHIYOOR_SURENDRAN": "IND_AYTHIYOOR_SURENDRAN", "BSP_ANIL_MANGALAPURAM": "BSP_ANIL_MANGALAPURAM", "IND_SAJIMON_CHELAYAM": "IND_SAJIMON_CHELAYAM", "LJP_ANILKUMAR_B": "LJP_ANILKUMAR_B", "INC_PALODE_RAVI": "INC_PALODE_RAVI", "CPI_ADV_P_RAMACHANDRAN_NAIR": "CPI_ADV_P_RAMACHANDRAN_NAIR", "BJP_ANJANA_K_S": "BJP_ANJANA_K_S", "IND_ANDOORKONAM_SULFI": "IND_ANDOORKONAM_SULFI", "SDPI_NOORJAHAN_A": "SDPI_NOORJAHAN_A", "BSP_IDAMMA_N": "BSP_IDAMMA_N", "IND_VAZHODE_RAVI": "IND_VAZHODE_RAVI", "IND_BIJU_A": "IND_BIJU_A", "IND_ANAD_G_RAMACHANDRAN_NAIR": "IND_ANAD_G_RAMACHANDRAN_NAIR", "IND_SAJI": "IND_SAJI", "CPM_KOLIAKODE_N_KRISHNAN_NAIR": "CPM_KOLIAKODE_N_KRISHNAN_NAIR", "INC_ADV_C_MOHANACHANDRAN": "INC_ADV_C_MOHANACHANDRAN", "BJP_KARETTE_SIVAPRASAD": "BJP_KARETTE_SIVAPRASAD", "SDPI_ADV_PIRAPPANKODE_SHAJAHAN": "SDPI_ADV_PIRAPPANKODE_SHAJAHAN", "IND_SELEENA_PRAKKANAM": "IND_SELEENA_PRAKKANAM", "BSP_SASI_R_CHERAMAN": "BSP_SASI_R_CHERAMAN", "IND_IRINCHAYAM_SURESH": "IND_IRINCHAYAM_SURESH", "IND_KRISHNAN_NAIR": "IND_KRISHNAN_NAIR", "IND_BHARATHANNOOR_BALAN": "IND_BHARATHANNOOR_BALAN", "INC_ADV_M_A_VAHEED": "INC_ADV_M_A_VAHEED", "CPM_C_AJAYAKUMAR": "CPM_C_AJAYAKUMAR", "BJP_ADV_PADMAKUMAR": "BJP_ADV_PADMAKUMAR", "IND_M_WAHID": "IND_M_WAHID", "BSP_K_BHUVANENDRAN_CHETTIAR": "BSP_K_BHUVANENDRAN_CHETTIAR", "SDPI_M_A_JALEEL": "SDPI_M_A_JALEEL", "IND_SUDARSHANAN_S": "IND_SUDARSHANAN_S", "IND_K_AJITHKUMAR": "IND_K_AJITHKUMAR", "INC_K_MURALIDHARAN": "INC_K_MURALIDHARAN", "IND_CHERIYAN_PHILIP": "IND_CHERIYAN_PHILIP", "BJP_ADV_V_V_RAJESH": "BJP_ADV_V_V_RAJESH", "BSP_KAITHAKODU_RADHAKRISHNAN": "BSP_KAITHAKODU_RADHAKRISHNAN", "IND_CHERIYAN_P_T": "IND_CHERIYAN_P_T", "IND_RAJAN_K": "IND_RAJAN_K", "KJ_G_BALAKRISHNAN_NAIR": "KJ_G_BALAKRISHNAN_NAIR", "INC_ADV_V_S_SIVAKUMAR": "INC_ADV_V_S_SIVAKUMAR", "KC_AMG_V_SURENDRAN_PILLAI": "KC_AMG_V_SURENDRAN_PILLAI", "BJP_B_K_SHEKHAR": "BJP_B_K_SHEKHAR", "SDPI_ABDU_RAZAK_A": "SDPI_ABDU_RAZAK_A", "IND_P_SURENDRAN_PILLAI": "IND_P_SURENDRAN_PILLAI", "IND_S_SIVAKUMAR": "IND_S_SIVAKUMAR", "SUCI_P_S_GOPAKUMAR": "SUCI_P_S_GOPAKUMAR", "IND_N_SIVAKUMAR": "IND_N_SIVAKUMAR", "IND_SUNDARAN_PILLAI": "IND_SUNDARAN_PILLAI", "IND_C_VASANTHA_KUMARI": "IND_C_VASANTHA_KUMARI", "IND_GEORGE_MANKIDIAN": "IND_GEORGE_MANKIDIAN", "CPM_V_SIVANKUTTY": "CPM_V_SIVANKUTTY", "BJP_O_RAJAGOPAL": "BJP_O_RAJAGOPAL", "SJD_CHARUPARA_RAVI": "SJD_CHARUPARA_RAVI", "IND_JAIN_WILSON": "IND_JAIN_WILSON", "BSP_O_MAHEEN": "BSP_O_MAHEEN", "IND_THIRUVALLAM_SREEKANTAN": "IND_THIRUVALLAM_SREEKANTAN", "DPSP_J_VIKRAMAN": "DPSP_J_VIKRAMAN", "IND_RAMACHANDRAN": "IND_RAMACHANDRAN", "INC_G_KARTHIKEYEN": "INC_G_KARTHIKEYEN", "RSP_AMBALATHARA_SREEDHARAN_NAIR": "RSP_AMBALATHARA_SREEDHARAN_NAIR", "BJP_SIVANKUTTY_C": "BJP_SIVANKUTTY_C", "BSP_A_BALAN": "BSP_A_BALAN", "IND_ADV_POOVATHOOR_S_RAJEEV": "IND_ADV_POOVATHOOR_S_RAJEEV", "IND_SANIL_V_O": "IND_SANIL_V_O", "IND_R_RAJAPPAN": "IND_R_RAJAPPAN", "IND_KARAKULAM_SATHYAKUMAR": "IND_KARAKULAM_SATHYAKUMAR", "SUCI_S_SREEKUMAR": "SUCI_S_SREEKUMAR", "IND_LATHA_B_VELLUMANNADI": "IND_LATHA_B_VELLUMANNADI", "INC_A_T_GEORGE": "INC_A_T_GEORGE", "CPM_ANAVOOR_NAGAPPAN": "CPM_ANAVOOR_NAGAPPAN", "BJP_ADV_S_SURESH": "BJP_ADV_S_SURESH", "BSP_J_SUDHAKARAN": "BSP_J_SUDHAKARAN", "IND_T_K_VISWAMBHARAN": "IND_T_K_VISWAMBHARAN", "SHS_OORUTTUKALA_ANIKUMAR": "SHS_OORUTTUKALA_ANIKUMAR", "INC_N_SAKTHAN": "INC_N_SAKTHAN", "IND_ADV_M_V_JAYADALI": "IND_ADV_M_V_JAYADALI", "BJP_P_K_KRISHNADAS": "BJP_P_K_KRISHNADAS", "BSP_VENGODE_SUNIL_KUMAR": "BSP_VENGODE_SUNIL_KUMAR", "SDPI_KATTAKKADA_RAJAN": "SDPI_KATTAKKADA_RAJAN", "IND_S_SUJITHRA": "IND_S_SUJITHRA", "IND_MALAYINKEEZH_RAJESH": "IND_MALAYINKEEZH_RAJESH", "JD_S_JAMEELA_PRAKASAM": "JD_S_JAMEELA_PRAKASAM", "INC_ADV_GEORGE_MERCIER": "INC_ADV_GEORGE_MERCIER", "BJP_VENGANOOR_SATHEESH": "BJP_VENGANOOR_SATHEESH", "IND_THANKA_BAI_T": "IND_THANKA_BAI_T", "SDPI_A_M_NIZAM": "SDPI_A_M_NIZAM", "BSP_MURALEEDHARAN": "BSP_MURALEEDHARAN", "DPSP_VAZHAMUTTOM_RAJENDRAN": "DPSP_VAZHAMUTTOM_RAJENDRAN", "CPM_R_SELVARAJ": "CPM_R_SELVARAJ", "INC_THAMPANOOR_RAVI": "INC_THAMPANOOR_RAVI", "BJP_ATHIYANNOOR_SREEKUMAR": "BJP_ATHIYANNOOR_SREEKUMAR", "BSP_KOVILLOOR_A_BABU": "BSP_KOVILLOOR_A_BABU", "IND_MOHANAN": "IND_MOHANAN", "IND_MANALOOR_B_VASANTHA": "IND_MANALOOR_B_VASANTHA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 140, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 140, "registered_not_positive": 140}, "n_stations_flagged": 140, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:51:58.697060", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.646, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.666, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.671, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.532, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.444, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.671, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.532, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.532, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.424, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.582, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 140}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3c78e308b3df4701b7bb7dcfed0c8b91", "name": "India 2012 local (overnight india-punjab-2012-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2012, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Punjab/Punjab_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"BJP_001_SUJANPUR": "BJP_001_SUJANPUR", "Independent_001_SUJANPUR_1": "Independent_001_SUJANPUR_1", "INC_001_SUJANPUR": "INC_001_SUJANPUR", "BSP_001_SUJANPUR": "BSP_001_SUJANPUR", "CPI_001_SUJANPUR": "CPI_001_SUJANPUR", "Independent_001_SUJANPUR_2": "Independent_001_SUJANPUR_2", "Independent_001_SUJANPUR_3": "Independent_001_SUJANPUR_3", "Independent_001_SUJANPUR_4": "Independent_001_SUJANPUR_4", "Independent_001_SUJANPUR_5": "Independent_001_SUJANPUR_5", "BJP_002_BHOA": "BJP_002_BHOA", "INC_002_BHOA": "INC_002_BHOA", "Independent_002_BHOA_1": "Independent_002_BHOA_1", "Independent_002_BHOA_2": "Independent_002_BHOA_2", "BSP_002_BHOA": "BSP_002_BHOA", "CPM_002_BHOA": "CPM_002_BHOA", "Independent_002_BHOA_3": "Independent_002_BHOA_3", "BJP_003_PATHANKOT": "BJP_003_PATHANKOT", "INC_003_PATHANKOT": "INC_003_PATHANKOT", "Independent_003_PATHANKOT_1": "Independent_003_PATHANKOT_1", "PPOP_003_PATHANKOT": "PPOP_003_PATHANKOT", "BSP_003_PATHANKOT": "BSP_003_PATHANKOT", "Independent_003_PATHANKOT_2": "Independent_003_PATHANKOT_2", "SHS_003_PATHANKOT": "SHS_003_PATHANKOT", "Independent_003_PATHANKOT_3": "Independent_003_PATHANKOT_3", "Independent_003_PATHANKOT_4": "Independent_003_PATHANKOT_4", "NCP_003_PATHANKOT": "NCP_003_PATHANKOT", "SAD_004_GURDASPUR": "SAD_004_GURDASPUR", "INC_004_GURDASPUR": "INC_004_GURDASPUR", "PPOP_004_GURDASPUR": "PPOP_004_GURDASPUR", "SSPD_004_GURDASPUR": "SSPD_004_GURDASPUR", "Independent_004_GURDASPUR_1": "Independent_004_GURDASPUR_1", "BSP_004_GURDASPUR": "BSP_004_GURDASPUR", "SHS_004_GURDASPUR": "SHS_004_GURDASPUR", "SAD_M_004_GURDASPUR": "SAD_M_004_GURDASPUR", "Independent_004_GURDASPUR_2": "Independent_004_GURDASPUR_2", "INC_005_DINA_NAGAR": "INC_005_DINA_NAGAR", "BJP_005_DINA_NAGAR": "BJP_005_DINA_NAGAR", "CPI_005_DINA_NAGAR": "CPI_005_DINA_NAGAR", "Independent_005_DINA_NAGAR_1": "Independent_005_DINA_NAGAR_1", "BSP_005_DINA_NAGAR": "BSP_005_DINA_NAGAR", "INC_006_QADIAN": "INC_006_QADIAN", "SAD_006_QADIAN": "SAD_006_QADIAN", "Independent_006_QADIAN_1": "Independent_006_QADIAN_1", "PPOP_006_QADIAN": "PPOP_006_QADIAN", "BSP_006_QADIAN": "BSP_006_QADIAN", "INC_007_BATALA": "INC_007_BATALA", "SAD_007_BATALA": "SAD_007_BATALA", "PPOP_007_BATALA": "PPOP_007_BATALA", "BSP_007_BATALA": "BSP_007_BATALA", "Independent_007_BATALA_1": "Independent_007_BATALA_1", "Independent_007_BATALA_2": "Independent_007_BATALA_2", "BSA_007_BATALA": "BSA_007_BATALA", "Independent_007_BATALA_3": "Independent_007_BATALA_3", "SAD_008_SRI_HARGOBINDPUR": "SAD_008_SRI_HARGOBINDPUR", "INC_008_SRI_HARGOBINDPUR": "INC_008_SRI_HARGOBINDPUR", "PPOP_008_SRI_HARGOBINDPUR": "PPOP_008_SRI_HARGOBINDPUR", "BSP_008_SRI_HARGOBINDPUR": "BSP_008_SRI_HARGOBINDPUR", "Independent_008_SRI_HARGOBINDPUR_1": "Independent_008_SRI_HARGOBINDPUR_1", "Independent_008_SRI_HARGOBINDPUR_2": "Independent_008_SRI_HARGOBINDPUR_2", "Independent_008_SRI_HARGOBINDPUR_3": "Independent_008_SRI_HARGOBINDPUR_3", "BSA_008_SRI_HARGOBINDPUR": "BSA_008_SRI_HARGOBINDPUR", "INC_009_FATEHGARH_CHURIAN": "INC_009_FATEHGARH_CHURIAN", "SAD_009_FATEHGARH_CHURIAN": "SAD_009_FATEHGARH_CHURIAN", "Independent_009_FATEHGARH_CHURIAN_1": "Independent_009_FATEHGARH_CHURIAN_1", "PPOP_009_FATEHGARH_CHURIAN": "PPOP_009_FATEHGARH_CHURIAN", "BSP_009_FATEHGARH_CHURIAN": "BSP_009_FATEHGARH_CHURIAN", "SAD_M_009_FATEHGARH_CHURIAN": "SAD_M_009_FATEHGARH_CHURIAN", "INC_010_DERA_BABA_NANAK": "INC_010_DERA_BABA_NANAK", "SAD_010_DERA_BABA_NANAK": "SAD_010_DERA_BABA_NANAK", "BSP_010_DERA_BABA_NANAK": "BSP_010_DERA_BABA_NANAK", "Independent_010_DERA_BABA_NANAK_1": "Independent_010_DERA_BABA_NANAK_1", "SHS_010_DERA_BABA_NANAK": "SHS_010_DERA_BABA_NANAK", "SAD_011_AJNALA": "SAD_011_AJNALA", "INC_011_AJNALA": "INC_011_AJNALA", "Independent_011_AJNALA_1": "Independent_011_AJNALA_1", "Independent_011_AJNALA_2": "Independent_011_AJNALA_2", "BSP_011_AJNALA": "BSP_011_AJNALA", "PPOP_011_AJNALA": "PPOP_011_AJNALA", "SSPD_011_AJNALA": "SSPD_011_AJNALA", "SAD_M_011_AJNALA": "SAD_M_011_AJNALA", "BSP_A_011_AJNALA": "BSP_A_011_AJNALA", "Independent_011_AJNALA_3": "Independent_011_AJNALA_3", "INC_012_RAJA_SANSI": "INC_012_RAJA_SANSI", "SAD_012_RAJA_SANSI": "SAD_012_RAJA_SANSI", "PPOP_012_RAJA_SANSI": "PPOP_012_RAJA_SANSI", "BSP_012_RAJA_SANSI": "BSP_012_RAJA_SANSI", "Independent_012_RAJA_SANSI_1": "Independent_012_RAJA_SANSI_1", "RBCP_012_RAJA_SANSI": "RBCP_012_RAJA_SANSI", "Independent_012_RAJA_SANSI_2": "Independent_012_RAJA_SANSI_2", "SAD_013_MAJITHA": "SAD_013_MAJITHA", "Independent_013_MAJITHA_1": "Independent_013_MAJITHA_1", "INC_013_MAJITHA": "INC_013_MAJITHA", "CPI_013_MAJITHA": "CPI_013_MAJITHA", "Independent_013_MAJITHA_2": "Independent_013_MAJITHA_2", "BSP_013_MAJITHA": "BSP_013_MAJITHA", "Independent_013_MAJITHA_3": "Independent_013_MAJITHA_3", "Independent_013_MAJITHA_4": "Independent_013_MAJITHA_4", "Independent_013_MAJITHA_5": "Independent_013_MAJITHA_5", "Independent_013_MAJITHA_6": "Independent_013_MAJITHA_6", "Independent_013_MAJITHA_7": "Independent_013_MAJITHA_7", "SAD_014_JANDIALA": "SAD_014_JANDIALA", "INC_014_JANDIALA": "INC_014_JANDIALA", "Independent_014_JANDIALA_1": "Independent_014_JANDIALA_1", "PPOP_014_JANDIALA": "PPOP_014_JANDIALA", "BSP_014_JANDIALA": "BSP_014_JANDIALA", "BSP_A_014_JANDIALA": "BSP_A_014_JANDIALA", "Independent_014_JANDIALA_2": "Independent_014_JANDIALA_2", "BJP_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH": "BJP_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH", "INC_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH": "INC_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH", "PPOP_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH": "PPOP_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH", "BSP_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH": "BSP_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH", "Independent_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH_1": "Independent_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH_1", "Independent_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH_2": "Independent_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH_2", "Independent_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH_3": "Independent_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH_3", "BCP_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH": "BCP_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH", "Independent_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH_4": "Independent_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH_4", "SSPD_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH": "SSPD_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH", "SAD_M_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH": "SAD_M_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH", "Independent_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH_5": "Independent_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH_5", "BGTD_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH": "BGTD_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH", "INC_016_AMRITSAR_WEST": "INC_016_AMRITSAR_WEST", "BJP_016_AMRITSAR_WEST": "BJP_016_AMRITSAR_WEST", "CPI_016_AMRITSAR_WEST": "CPI_016_AMRITSAR_WEST", "BSP_016_AMRITSAR_WEST": "BSP_016_AMRITSAR_WEST", "NCP_016_AMRITSAR_WEST": "NCP_016_AMRITSAR_WEST", "Independent_016_AMRITSAR_WEST_1": "Independent_016_AMRITSAR_WEST_1", "BCP_016_AMRITSAR_WEST": "BCP_016_AMRITSAR_WEST", "Independent_016_AMRITSAR_WEST_2": "Independent_016_AMRITSAR_WEST_2", "INC_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL": "INC_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL", "BJP_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL": "BJP_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL", "CPM_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL": "CPM_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL", "BSP_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL": "BSP_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL", "Independent_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL_1": "Independent_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL_1", "Independent_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL_2": "Independent_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL_2", "BCP_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL": "BCP_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL", "Independent_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL_3": "Independent_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL_3", "Independent_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL_4": "Independent_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL_4", "BJP_018_AMRITSAR_EAST": "BJP_018_AMRITSAR_EAST", "Independent_018_AMRITSAR_EAST_1": "Independent_018_AMRITSAR_EAST_1", "INC_018_AMRITSAR_EAST": "INC_018_AMRITSAR_EAST", "CPI_018_AMRITSAR_EAST": "CPI_018_AMRITSAR_EAST", "BSP_018_AMRITSAR_EAST": "BSP_018_AMRITSAR_EAST", "Independent_018_AMRITSAR_EAST_2": "Independent_018_AMRITSAR_EAST_2", "Independent_018_AMRITSAR_EAST_3": "Independent_018_AMRITSAR_EAST_3", "NCP_018_AMRITSAR_EAST": "NCP_018_AMRITSAR_EAST", "SAD_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH": "SAD_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH", "INC_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH": "INC_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH", "Independent_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH_1": "Independent_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH_1", "Independent_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH_2": "Independent_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH_2", "BSP_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH": "BSP_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH", "Independent_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH_3": "Independent_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH_3", "PPOP_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH": "PPOP_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH", "DCP_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH": "DCP_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH", "SAD_M_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH": "SAD_M_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH", "Independent_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH_4": "Independent_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH_4", "SAD_020_ATTARI": "SAD_020_ATTARI", "INC_020_ATTARI": "INC_020_ATTARI", "PPOP_020_ATTARI": "PPOP_020_ATTARI", "BSP_020_ATTARI": "BSP_020_ATTARI", "SAD_021_TARN_TARAN": "SAD_021_TARN_TARAN", "INC_021_TARN_TARAN": "INC_021_TARN_TARAN", "Independent_021_TARN_TARAN_1": "Independent_021_TARN_TARAN_1", "PPOP_021_TARN_TARAN": "PPOP_021_TARN_TARAN", "BSP_021_TARN_TARAN": "BSP_021_TARN_TARAN", "BSP_A_021_TARN_TARAN": "BSP_A_021_TARN_TARAN", "BSA_021_TARN_TARAN": "BSA_021_TARN_TARAN", "SAD_022_KHEM_KARAN": "SAD_022_KHEM_KARAN", "INC_022_KHEM_KARAN": "INC_022_KHEM_KARAN", "PnPP_022_KHEM_KARAN": "PnPP_022_KHEM_KARAN", "Independent_022_KHEM_KARAN_1": "Independent_022_KHEM_KARAN_1", "Independent_022_KHEM_KARAN_2": "Independent_022_KHEM_KARAN_2", "BSP_022_KHEM_KARAN": "BSP_022_KHEM_KARAN", "Independent_022_KHEM_KARAN_3": "Independent_022_KHEM_KARAN_3", "Independent_022_KHEM_KARAN_4": "Independent_022_KHEM_KARAN_4", "BSP_A_022_KHEM_KARAN": "BSP_A_022_KHEM_KARAN", "LJP_022_KHEM_KARAN": "LJP_022_KHEM_KARAN", "SAD_M_022_KHEM_KARAN": "SAD_M_022_KHEM_KARAN", "SAD_023_PATTI": "SAD_023_PATTI", "INC_023_PATTI": "INC_023_PATTI", "CPM_023_PATTI": "CPM_023_PATTI", "Independent_023_PATTI_1": "Independent_023_PATTI_1", "BSP_023_PATTI": "BSP_023_PATTI", "Independent_023_PATTI_2": "Independent_023_PATTI_2", "BSP_A_023_PATTI": "BSP_A_023_PATTI", "INC_024_KHADOOR_SAHIB": "INC_024_KHADOOR_SAHIB", "SAD_024_KHADOOR_SAHIB": "SAD_024_KHADOOR_SAHIB", "PPOP_024_KHADOOR_SAHIB": "PPOP_024_KHADOOR_SAHIB", "Independent_024_KHADOOR_SAHIB_1": "Independent_024_KHADOOR_SAHIB_1", "LJP_024_KHADOOR_SAHIB": "LJP_024_KHADOOR_SAHIB", "BSP_024_KHADOOR_SAHIB": "BSP_024_KHADOOR_SAHIB", "BSP_A_024_KHADOOR_SAHIB": "BSP_A_024_KHADOOR_SAHIB", "SAD_025_BABA_BAKALA": "SAD_025_BABA_BAKALA", "INC_025_BABA_BAKALA": "INC_025_BABA_BAKALA", "Independent_025_BABA_BAKALA_1": "Independent_025_BABA_BAKALA_1", "Independent_025_BABA_BAKALA_2": "Independent_025_BABA_BAKALA_2", "PnPP_025_BABA_BAKALA": "PnPP_025_BABA_BAKALA", "Independent_025_BABA_BAKALA_3": "Independent_025_BABA_BAKALA_3", "Independent_025_BABA_BAKALA_4": "Independent_025_BABA_BAKALA_4", "BSP_025_BABA_BAKALA": "BSP_025_BABA_BAKALA", "BSP_A_025_BABA_BAKALA": "BSP_A_025_BABA_BAKALA", "SSPD_025_BABA_BAKALA": "SSPD_025_BABA_BAKALA", "Independent_025_BABA_BAKALA_5": "Independent_025_BABA_BAKALA_5", "SAD_026_BHOLATH": "SAD_026_BHOLATH", "INC_026_BHOLATH": "INC_026_BHOLATH", "PPOP_026_BHOLATH": "PPOP_026_BHOLATH", "BSP_026_BHOLATH": "BSP_026_BHOLATH", "Independent_026_BHOLATH_1": "Independent_026_BHOLATH_1", "DBSP_026_BHOLATH": "DBSP_026_BHOLATH", "BGTD_026_BHOLATH": "BGTD_026_BHOLATH", "Independent_026_BHOLATH_2": "Independent_026_BHOLATH_2", "INC_027_KAPURTHALA": "INC_027_KAPURTHALA", "SAD_027_KAPURTHALA": "SAD_027_KAPURTHALA", "BSP_027_KAPURTHALA": "BSP_027_KAPURTHALA", "PPOP_027_KAPURTHALA": "PPOP_027_KAPURTHALA", "BSP_A_027_KAPURTHALA": "BSP_A_027_KAPURTHALA", "Independent_027_KAPURTHALA_1": "Independent_027_KAPURTHALA_1", "BGTD_027_KAPURTHALA": "BGTD_027_KAPURTHALA", "INC_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI": "INC_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI", "SAD_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI": "SAD_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI", "PPOP_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI": "PPOP_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI", "BSP_A_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI": "BSP_A_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI", "BSP_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI": "BSP_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI", "Independent_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI_1": "Independent_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI_1", "Independent_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI_2": "Independent_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI_2", "Independent_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI_3": "Independent_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI_3", "SAD_M_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI": "SAD_M_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI", "Independent_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI_4": "Independent_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI_4", "RVLP_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI": "RVLP_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI", "BJP_029_PHAGWARA": "BJP_029_PHAGWARA", "INC_029_PHAGWARA": "INC_029_PHAGWARA", "BSP_029_PHAGWARA": "BSP_029_PHAGWARA", "PPOP_029_PHAGWARA": "PPOP_029_PHAGWARA", "Independent_029_PHAGWARA_1": "Independent_029_PHAGWARA_1", "SHS_029_PHAGWARA": "SHS_029_PHAGWARA", "BSP_A_029_PHAGWARA": "BSP_A_029_PHAGWARA", "Independent_029_PHAGWARA_2": "Independent_029_PHAGWARA_2", "Independent_029_PHAGWARA_3": "Independent_029_PHAGWARA_3", "Independent_029_PHAGWARA_4": "Independent_029_PHAGWARA_4", "Independent_029_PHAGWARA_5": "Independent_029_PHAGWARA_5", "SAD_030_PHILLAUR": "SAD_030_PHILLAUR", "INC_030_PHILLAUR": "INC_030_PHILLAUR", "BSP_030_PHILLAUR": "BSP_030_PHILLAUR", "Independent_030_PHILLAUR_1": "Independent_030_PHILLAUR_1", "CPM_030_PHILLAUR": "CPM_030_PHILLAUR", "Independent_030_PHILLAUR_2": "Independent_030_PHILLAUR_2", "Independent_030_PHILLAUR_3": "Independent_030_PHILLAUR_3", "Independent_030_PHILLAUR_4": "Independent_030_PHILLAUR_4", "Independent_030_PHILLAUR_5": "Independent_030_PHILLAUR_5", "SAD_031_NAKODAR": "SAD_031_NAKODAR", "INC_031_NAKODAR": "INC_031_NAKODAR", "BSP_031_NAKODAR": "BSP_031_NAKODAR", "Independent_031_NAKODAR_1": "Independent_031_NAKODAR_1", "PPOP_031_NAKODAR": "PPOP_031_NAKODAR", "Independent_031_NAKODAR_2": "Independent_031_NAKODAR_2", "BSP_A_031_NAKODAR": "BSP_A_031_NAKODAR", "DBSP_031_NAKODAR": "DBSP_031_NAKODAR", "SAD_032_SHAHKOT": "SAD_032_SHAHKOT", "INC_032_SHAHKOT": "INC_032_SHAHKOT", "PPOP_032_SHAHKOT": "PPOP_032_SHAHKOT", "BSP_032_SHAHKOT": "BSP_032_SHAHKOT", "Independent_032_SHAHKOT_1": "Independent_032_SHAHKOT_1", "BSP_A_032_SHAHKOT": "BSP_A_032_SHAHKOT", "Independent_032_SHAHKOT_2": "Independent_032_SHAHKOT_2", "RVLP_032_SHAHKOT": "RVLP_032_SHAHKOT", "SAD_033_KARTARPUR": "SAD_033_KARTARPUR", "INC_033_KARTARPUR": "INC_033_KARTARPUR", "BSP_033_KARTARPUR": "BSP_033_KARTARPUR", "PnPP_033_KARTARPUR": "PnPP_033_KARTARPUR", "Independent_033_KARTARPUR_1": "Independent_033_KARTARPUR_1", "Independent_033_KARTARPUR_2": "Independent_033_KARTARPUR_2", "Independent_033_KARTARPUR_3": "Independent_033_KARTARPUR_3", "DBSP_033_KARTARPUR": "DBSP_033_KARTARPUR", "Independent_033_KARTARPUR_4": "Independent_033_KARTARPUR_4", "Independent_033_KARTARPUR_5": "Independent_033_KARTARPUR_5", "Independent_033_KARTARPUR_6": "Independent_033_KARTARPUR_6", "BJP_034_JALANDHAR_WEST": "BJP_034_JALANDHAR_WEST", "INC_034_JALANDHAR_WEST": "INC_034_JALANDHAR_WEST", "BSP_034_JALANDHAR_WEST": "BSP_034_JALANDHAR_WEST", "PPOP_034_JALANDHAR_WEST": "PPOP_034_JALANDHAR_WEST", "Independent_034_JALANDHAR_WEST_1": "Independent_034_JALANDHAR_WEST_1", "BSA_034_JALANDHAR_WEST": "BSA_034_JALANDHAR_WEST", "LJP_034_JALANDHAR_WEST": "LJP_034_JALANDHAR_WEST", "BJP_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL": "BJP_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL", "INC_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL": "INC_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL", "BSP_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL": "BSP_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL", "PPOP_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL": "PPOP_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL", "SHS_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL": "SHS_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL", "Independent_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL_1": "Independent_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL_1", "NCP_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL": "NCP_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL", "DBSP_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL": "DBSP_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL", "Independent_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL_2": "Independent_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL_2", "Independent_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL_3": "Independent_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL_3", "SAD_M_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL": "SAD_M_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL", "BJP_036_JALANDHAR_NORTH": "BJP_036_JALANDHAR_NORTH", "INC_036_JALANDHAR_NORTH": "INC_036_JALANDHAR_NORTH", "BSP_036_JALANDHAR_NORTH": "BSP_036_JALANDHAR_NORTH", "Independent_036_JALANDHAR_NORTH_1": "Independent_036_JALANDHAR_NORTH_1", "PnPP_036_JALANDHAR_NORTH": "PnPP_036_JALANDHAR_NORTH", "Independent_036_JALANDHAR_NORTH_2": "Independent_036_JALANDHAR_NORTH_2", "Independent_036_JALANDHAR_NORTH_3": "Independent_036_JALANDHAR_NORTH_3", "SAD_037_JALANDHAR_CANTT": "SAD_037_JALANDHAR_CANTT", "INC_037_JALANDHAR_CANTT": "INC_037_JALANDHAR_CANTT", "BSP_037_JALANDHAR_CANTT": "BSP_037_JALANDHAR_CANTT", "PPOP_037_JALANDHAR_CANTT": "PPOP_037_JALANDHAR_CANTT", "BSP_A_037_JALANDHAR_CANTT": "BSP_A_037_JALANDHAR_CANTT", "Independent_037_JALANDHAR_CANTT_1": "Independent_037_JALANDHAR_CANTT_1", "Independent_037_JALANDHAR_CANTT_2": "Independent_037_JALANDHAR_CANTT_2", "SAD_038_ADAMPUR": "SAD_038_ADAMPUR", "INC_038_ADAMPUR": "INC_038_ADAMPUR", "BSP_038_ADAMPUR": "BSP_038_ADAMPUR", "Independent_038_ADAMPUR_1": "Independent_038_ADAMPUR_1", "PnPP_038_ADAMPUR": "PnPP_038_ADAMPUR", "Independent_038_ADAMPUR_2": "Independent_038_ADAMPUR_2", "Independent_038_ADAMPUR_3": "Independent_038_ADAMPUR_3", "Independent_038_ADAMPUR_4": "Independent_038_ADAMPUR_4", "DBSP_038_ADAMPUR": "DBSP_038_ADAMPUR", "BSP_A_038_ADAMPUR": "BSP_A_038_ADAMPUR", "Independent_038_ADAMPUR_5": "Independent_038_ADAMPUR_5", "Independent_039_MUKERIAN_1": "Independent_039_MUKERIAN_1", "BJP_039_MUKERIAN": "BJP_039_MUKERIAN", "INC_039_MUKERIAN": "INC_039_MUKERIAN", "PPOP_039_MUKERIAN": "PPOP_039_MUKERIAN", "BSP_039_MUKERIAN": "BSP_039_MUKERIAN", "Independent_039_MUKERIAN_2": "Independent_039_MUKERIAN_2", "SAD_M_039_MUKERIAN": "SAD_M_039_MUKERIAN", "DBSP_039_MUKERIAN": "DBSP_039_MUKERIAN", "BJP_040_DASUYA": "BJP_040_DASUYA", "INC_040_DASUYA": "INC_040_DASUYA", "PPOP_040_DASUYA": "PPOP_040_DASUYA", "BSP_040_DASUYA": "BSP_040_DASUYA", "Independent_040_DASUYA_1": "Independent_040_DASUYA_1", "SAD_M_040_DASUYA": "SAD_M_040_DASUYA", "DBSP_040_DASUYA": "DBSP_040_DASUYA", "INC_041_URMAR": "INC_041_URMAR", "SAD_041_URMAR": "SAD_041_URMAR", "Independent_041_URMAR_1": "Independent_041_URMAR_1", "BSP_041_URMAR": "BSP_041_URMAR", "PPOP_041_URMAR": "PPOP_041_URMAR", "SHS_041_URMAR": "SHS_041_URMAR", "SAD_M_041_URMAR": "SAD_M_041_URMAR", "SAD_042_SHAM_CHAURASI": "SAD_042_SHAM_CHAURASI", "INC_042_SHAM_CHAURASI": "INC_042_SHAM_CHAURASI", "BSP_042_SHAM_CHAURASI": "BSP_042_SHAM_CHAURASI", "PPOP_042_SHAM_CHAURASI": "PPOP_042_SHAM_CHAURASI", "SAD_M_042_SHAM_CHAURASI": "SAD_M_042_SHAM_CHAURASI", "Independent_042_SHAM_CHAURASI_1": "Independent_042_SHAM_CHAURASI_1", "BhJaSP_042_SHAM_CHAURASI": "BhJaSP_042_SHAM_CHAURASI", "INC_043_HOSHIARPUR": "INC_043_HOSHIARPUR", "BJP_043_HOSHIARPUR": "BJP_043_HOSHIARPUR", "BSP_043_HOSHIARPUR": "BSP_043_HOSHIARPUR", "PPOP_043_HOSHIARPUR": "PPOP_043_HOSHIARPUR", "SHS_043_HOSHIARPUR": "SHS_043_HOSHIARPUR", "Independent_043_HOSHIARPUR_1": "Independent_043_HOSHIARPUR_1", "Independent_043_HOSHIARPUR_2": "Independent_043_HOSHIARPUR_2", "SAD_M_043_HOSHIARPUR": "SAD_M_043_HOSHIARPUR", "BGTD_043_HOSHIARPUR": "BGTD_043_HOSHIARPUR", "DBSP_043_HOSHIARPUR": "DBSP_043_HOSHIARPUR", "SAD_044_CHABBEWAL": "SAD_044_CHABBEWAL", "INC_044_CHABBEWAL": "INC_044_CHABBEWAL", "BSP_044_CHABBEWAL": "BSP_044_CHABBEWAL", "Independent_044_CHABBEWAL_1": "Independent_044_CHABBEWAL_1", "PPOP_044_CHABBEWAL": "PPOP_044_CHABBEWAL", "Independent_044_CHABBEWAL_2": "Independent_044_CHABBEWAL_2", "Independent_044_CHABBEWAL_3": "Independent_044_CHABBEWAL_3", "Independent_044_CHABBEWAL_4": "Independent_044_CHABBEWAL_4", "Independent_044_CHABBEWAL_5": "Independent_044_CHABBEWAL_5", "LJP_044_CHABBEWAL": "LJP_044_CHABBEWAL", "SAD_M_044_CHABBEWAL": "SAD_M_044_CHABBEWAL", "SAD_045_GARHSHANKAR": "SAD_045_GARHSHANKAR", "INC_045_GARHSHANKAR": "INC_045_GARHSHANKAR", "BSP_045_GARHSHANKAR": "BSP_045_GARHSHANKAR", "CPM_045_GARHSHANKAR": "CPM_045_GARHSHANKAR", "SAD_M_045_GARHSHANKAR": "SAD_M_045_GARHSHANKAR", "INC_046_BANGA": "INC_046_BANGA", "SAD_046_BANGA": "SAD_046_BANGA", "BSP_046_BANGA": "BSP_046_BANGA", "PPOP_046_BANGA": "PPOP_046_BANGA", "Independent_046_BANGA_1": "Independent_046_BANGA_1", "Independent_046_BANGA_2": "Independent_046_BANGA_2", "Independent_046_BANGA_3": "Independent_046_BANGA_3", "Independent_046_BANGA_4": "Independent_046_BANGA_4", "BSA_046_BANGA": "BSA_046_BANGA", "LJP_046_BANGA": "LJP_046_BANGA", "INC_047_NAWAN_SHAHR": "INC_047_NAWAN_SHAHR", "SAD_047_NAWAN_SHAHR": "SAD_047_NAWAN_SHAHR", "BSP_047_NAWAN_SHAHR": "BSP_047_NAWAN_SHAHR", "PPOP_047_NAWAN_SHAHR": "PPOP_047_NAWAN_SHAHR", "Independent_047_NAWAN_SHAHR_1": "Independent_047_NAWAN_SHAHR_1", "Independent_047_NAWAN_SHAHR_2": "Independent_047_NAWAN_SHAHR_2", "Independent_047_NAWAN_SHAHR_3": "Independent_047_NAWAN_SHAHR_3", "NCP_047_NAWAN_SHAHR": "NCP_047_NAWAN_SHAHR", "Independent_047_NAWAN_SHAHR_4": "Independent_047_NAWAN_SHAHR_4", "SAD_M_047_NAWAN_SHAHR": "SAD_M_047_NAWAN_SHAHR", "BSA_047_NAWAN_SHAHR": "BSA_047_NAWAN_SHAHR", "SAD_048_BALACHAUR": "SAD_048_BALACHAUR", "BSP_048_BALACHAUR": "BSP_048_BALACHAUR", "INC_048_BALACHAUR": "INC_048_BALACHAUR", "PPOP_048_BALACHAUR": "PPOP_048_BALACHAUR", "Independent_048_BALACHAUR_1": "Independent_048_BALACHAUR_1", "Independent_048_BALACHAUR_2": "Independent_048_BALACHAUR_2", "BJP_049_ANANDPUR_SAHIB": "BJP_049_ANANDPUR_SAHIB", "INC_049_ANANDPUR_SAHIB": "INC_049_ANANDPUR_SAHIB", "BSP_049_ANANDPUR_SAHIB": "BSP_049_ANANDPUR_SAHIB", "CPM_049_ANANDPUR_SAHIB": "CPM_049_ANANDPUR_SAHIB", "Independent_049_ANANDPUR_SAHIB_1": "Independent_049_ANANDPUR_SAHIB_1", "SAD_M_049_ANANDPUR_SAHIB": "SAD_M_049_ANANDPUR_SAHIB", "Independent_049_ANANDPUR_SAHIB_2": "Independent_049_ANANDPUR_SAHIB_2", "BGTD_049_ANANDPUR_SAHIB": "BGTD_049_ANANDPUR_SAHIB", "SAD_050_RUPNAGAR": "SAD_050_RUPNAGAR", "INC_050_RUPNAGAR": "INC_050_RUPNAGAR", "PPOP_050_RUPNAGAR": "PPOP_050_RUPNAGAR", "BSP_050_RUPNAGAR": "BSP_050_RUPNAGAR", "Independent_050_RUPNAGAR_1": "Independent_050_RUPNAGAR_1", "Independent_050_RUPNAGAR_2": "Independent_050_RUPNAGAR_2", "Independent_050_RUPNAGAR_3": "Independent_050_RUPNAGAR_3", "Independent_050_RUPNAGAR_4": "Independent_050_RUPNAGAR_4", "SAD_M_050_RUPNAGAR": "SAD_M_050_RUPNAGAR", "BRSP_050_RUPNAGAR": "BRSP_050_RUPNAGAR", "INC_051_CHAMKAUR_SAHIB": "INC_051_CHAMKAUR_SAHIB", "SAD_051_CHAMKAUR_SAHIB": "SAD_051_CHAMKAUR_SAHIB", "PPOP_051_CHAMKAUR_SAHIB": "PPOP_051_CHAMKAUR_SAHIB", "BSP_051_CHAMKAUR_SAHIB": "BSP_051_CHAMKAUR_SAHIB", "Independent_051_CHAMKAUR_SAHIB_1": "Independent_051_CHAMKAUR_SAHIB_1", "LJP_051_CHAMKAUR_SAHIB": "LJP_051_CHAMKAUR_SAHIB", "SAD_M_051_CHAMKAUR_SAHIB": "SAD_M_051_CHAMKAUR_SAHIB", "Independent_051_CHAMKAUR_SAHIB_2": "Independent_051_CHAMKAUR_SAHIB_2", "INC_052_KHARAR": "INC_052_KHARAR", "SAD_052_KHARAR": "SAD_052_KHARAR", "BSP_052_KHARAR": "BSP_052_KHARAR", "Independent_052_KHARAR_1": "Independent_052_KHARAR_1", "PPOP_052_KHARAR": "PPOP_052_KHARAR", "Independent_052_KHARAR_2": "Independent_052_KHARAR_2", "Independent_052_KHARAR_3": "Independent_052_KHARAR_3", "NCP_052_KHARAR": "NCP_052_KHARAR", "Independent_052_KHARAR_4": "Independent_052_KHARAR_4", "SAD_M_052_KHARAR": "SAD_M_052_KHARAR", "ARWP_052_KHARAR": "ARWP_052_KHARAR", "INC_053_S_A_S_NAGAR": "INC_053_S_A_S_NAGAR", "SAD_053_S_A_S_NAGAR": "SAD_053_S_A_S_NAGAR", "PPOP_053_S_A_S_NAGAR": "PPOP_053_S_A_S_NAGAR", "BSP_053_S_A_S_NAGAR": "BSP_053_S_A_S_NAGAR", "Independent_053_S_A_S_NAGAR_1": "Independent_053_S_A_S_NAGAR_1", "Independent_053_S_A_S_NAGAR_2": "Independent_053_S_A_S_NAGAR_2", "SAD_M_053_S_A_S_NAGAR": "SAD_M_053_S_A_S_NAGAR", "Independent_053_S_A_S_NAGAR_3": "Independent_053_S_A_S_NAGAR_3", "Independent_053_S_A_S_NAGAR_4": "Independent_053_S_A_S_NAGAR_4", "ARWP_053_S_A_S_NAGAR": "ARWP_053_S_A_S_NAGAR", "SAD_054_BASSI_PATHANA": "SAD_054_BASSI_PATHANA", "INC_054_BASSI_PATHANA": "INC_054_BASSI_PATHANA", "PPOP_054_BASSI_PATHANA": "PPOP_054_BASSI_PATHANA", "BSP_054_BASSI_PATHANA": "BSP_054_BASSI_PATHANA", "Independent_054_BASSI_PATHANA_1": "Independent_054_BASSI_PATHANA_1", "SAD_M_054_BASSI_PATHANA": "SAD_M_054_BASSI_PATHANA", "INC_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB": "INC_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB", "SAD_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB": "SAD_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB", "PPOP_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB": "PPOP_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB", "SAD_M_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB": "SAD_M_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB", "Independent_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB_1": "Independent_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB_1", "BSP_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB": "BSP_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB", "Independent_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB_2": "Independent_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB_2", "Independent_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB_3": "Independent_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB_3", "Independent_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB_4": "Independent_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB_4", "NCP_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB": "NCP_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB", "Independent_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB_5": "Independent_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB_5", "Independent_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB_6": "Independent_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB_6", "Independent_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB_7": "Independent_055_FATEHGARH_SAHIB_7", "INC_056_AMLOH": "INC_056_AMLOH", "SAD_056_AMLOH": "SAD_056_AMLOH", "PPOP_056_AMLOH": "PPOP_056_AMLOH", "BSP_056_AMLOH": "BSP_056_AMLOH", "Independent_056_AMLOH_1": "Independent_056_AMLOH_1", "Independent_056_AMLOH_2": "Independent_056_AMLOH_2", "SAD_M_056_AMLOH": "SAD_M_056_AMLOH", "Independent_056_AMLOH_3": "Independent_056_AMLOH_3", "Independent_056_AMLOH_4": "Independent_056_AMLOH_4", "INC_057_KHANNA": "INC_057_KHANNA", "SAD_057_KHANNA": "SAD_057_KHANNA", "PPOP_057_KHANNA": "PPOP_057_KHANNA", "BSP_057_KHANNA": "BSP_057_KHANNA", "Independent_057_KHANNA_1": "Independent_057_KHANNA_1", "Independent_057_KHANNA_2": "Independent_057_KHANNA_2", "SAD_M_057_KHANNA": "SAD_M_057_KHANNA", "Independent_057_KHANNA_3": "Independent_057_KHANNA_3", "Independent_057_KHANNA_4": "Independent_057_KHANNA_4", "Independent_057_KHANNA_5": "Independent_057_KHANNA_5", "INC_058_SAMRALA": "INC_058_SAMRALA", "SAD_058_SAMRALA": "SAD_058_SAMRALA", "Independent_058_SAMRALA_1": "Independent_058_SAMRALA_1", "PPOP_058_SAMRALA": "PPOP_058_SAMRALA", "BSP_058_SAMRALA": "BSP_058_SAMRALA", "Independent_058_SAMRALA_2": "Independent_058_SAMRALA_2", "SAD_M_058_SAMRALA": "SAD_M_058_SAMRALA", "Independent_058_SAMRALA_3": "Independent_058_SAMRALA_3", "Independent_058_SAMRALA_4": "Independent_058_SAMRALA_4", "SAD_059_SAHNEWAL": "SAD_059_SAHNEWAL", "INC_059_SAHNEWAL": "INC_059_SAHNEWAL", "BSP_059_SAHNEWAL": "BSP_059_SAHNEWAL", "Independent_059_SAHNEWAL_1": "Independent_059_SAHNEWAL_1", "CPM_059_SAHNEWAL": "CPM_059_SAHNEWAL", "Independent_059_SAHNEWAL_2": "Independent_059_SAHNEWAL_2", "RJD_059_SAHNEWAL": "RJD_059_SAHNEWAL", "Independent_059_SAHNEWAL_3": "Independent_059_SAHNEWAL_3", "SAD_M_059_SAHNEWAL": "SAD_M_059_SAHNEWAL", "ADJSP_059_SAHNEWAL": "ADJSP_059_SAHNEWAL", "BHSVP_059_SAHNEWAL": "BHSVP_059_SAHNEWAL", "NCP_059_SAHNEWAL": "NCP_059_SAHNEWAL", "LJP_059_SAHNEWAL": "LJP_059_SAHNEWAL", "SAD_060_LUDHIANA_EAST": "SAD_060_LUDHIANA_EAST", "INC_060_LUDHIANA_EAST": "INC_060_LUDHIANA_EAST", "Independent_060_LUDHIANA_EAST_1": "Independent_060_LUDHIANA_EAST_1", "BSP_060_LUDHIANA_EAST": "BSP_060_LUDHIANA_EAST", "PPOP_060_LUDHIANA_EAST": "PPOP_060_LUDHIANA_EAST", "Independent_060_LUDHIANA_EAST_2": "Independent_060_LUDHIANA_EAST_2", "SAD_M_060_LUDHIANA_EAST": "SAD_M_060_LUDHIANA_EAST", "Independent_060_LUDHIANA_EAST_3": "Independent_060_LUDHIANA_EAST_3", "Independent_060_LUDHIANA_EAST_4": "Independent_060_LUDHIANA_EAST_4", "BSP_K_060_LUDHIANA_EAST": "BSP_K_060_LUDHIANA_EAST", "Independent_060_LUDHIANA_EAST_5": "Independent_060_LUDHIANA_EAST_5", "SHS_060_LUDHIANA_EAST": "SHS_060_LUDHIANA_EAST", "Independent_060_LUDHIANA_EAST_6": "Independent_060_LUDHIANA_EAST_6", "Independent_060_LUDHIANA_EAST_7": "Independent_060_LUDHIANA_EAST_7", "ABSR_060_LUDHIANA_EAST": "ABSR_060_LUDHIANA_EAST", "BGTD_060_LUDHIANA_EAST": "BGTD_060_LUDHIANA_EAST", "Independent_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH_1": "Independent_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH_1", "SAD_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH": "SAD_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH", "INC_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH": "INC_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH", "BSP_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH": "BSP_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH", "Independent_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH_2": "Independent_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH_2", "Independent_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH_3": "Independent_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH_3", "PPOP_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH": "PPOP_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH", "Independent_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH_4": "Independent_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH_4", "Independent_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH_5": "Independent_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH_5", "Independent_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH_6": "Independent_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH_6", "Independent_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH_7": "Independent_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH_7", "NCP_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH": "NCP_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH", "RASAP_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH": "RASAP_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH", "Independent_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH_8": "Independent_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH_8", "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_1": "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_1", "SAD_062_ATAM_NAGAR": "SAD_062_ATAM_NAGAR", "INC_062_ATAM_NAGAR": "INC_062_ATAM_NAGAR", "PPOP_062_ATAM_NAGAR": "PPOP_062_ATAM_NAGAR", "BSP_062_ATAM_NAGAR": "BSP_062_ATAM_NAGAR", "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_2": "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_2", "NCP_062_ATAM_NAGAR": "NCP_062_ATAM_NAGAR", "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_3": "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_3", "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_4": "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_4", "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_5": "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_5", "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_6": "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_6", "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_7": "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_7", "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_8": "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_8", "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_9": "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_9", "BGTD_062_ATAM_NAGAR": "BGTD_062_ATAM_NAGAR", "INC_063_LUDHIANA_CENTRAL": "INC_063_LUDHIANA_CENTRAL", "BJP_063_LUDHIANA_CENTRAL": "BJP_063_LUDHIANA_CENTRAL", "Independent_063_LUDHIANA_CENTRAL_1": "Independent_063_LUDHIANA_CENTRAL_1", "BSP_063_LUDHIANA_CENTRAL": "BSP_063_LUDHIANA_CENTRAL", "PPOP_063_LUDHIANA_CENTRAL": "PPOP_063_LUDHIANA_CENTRAL", "Independent_063_LUDHIANA_CENTRAL_2": "Independent_063_LUDHIANA_CENTRAL_2", "Independent_063_LUDHIANA_CENTRAL_3": "Independent_063_LUDHIANA_CENTRAL_3", "SSPD_063_LUDHIANA_CENTRAL": "SSPD_063_LUDHIANA_CENTRAL", "BGTD_063_LUDHIANA_CENTRAL": "BGTD_063_LUDHIANA_CENTRAL", "Independent_063_LUDHIANA_CENTRAL_4": "Independent_063_LUDHIANA_CENTRAL_4", "Independent_063_LUDHIANA_CENTRAL_5": "Independent_063_LUDHIANA_CENTRAL_5", "INC_064_LUDHIANA_WEST": "INC_064_LUDHIANA_WEST", "BJP_064_LUDHIANA_WEST": "BJP_064_LUDHIANA_WEST", "CPI_064_LUDHIANA_WEST": "CPI_064_LUDHIANA_WEST", "BSP_064_LUDHIANA_WEST": "BSP_064_LUDHIANA_WEST", "Independent_064_LUDHIANA_WEST_1": "Independent_064_LUDHIANA_WEST_1", "Independent_064_LUDHIANA_WEST_2": "Independent_064_LUDHIANA_WEST_2", "INC_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH": "INC_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH", "BJP_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH": "BJP_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH", "BSP_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH": "BSP_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH", "Independent_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH_1": "Independent_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH_1", "PPOP_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH": "PPOP_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH", "Independent_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH_2": "Independent_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH_2", "SHS_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH": "SHS_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH", "Independent_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH_3": "Independent_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH_3", "NCP_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH": "NCP_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH", "Independent_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH_4": "Independent_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH_4", "BHSVP_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH": "BHSVP_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH", "BGTD_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH": "BGTD_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH", "SAD_066_GILL": "SAD_066_GILL", "INC_066_GILL": "INC_066_GILL", "PPOP_066_GILL": "PPOP_066_GILL", "BSP_066_GILL": "BSP_066_GILL", "Independent_066_GILL_1": "Independent_066_GILL_1", "Independent_066_GILL_2": "Independent_066_GILL_2", "Independent_066_GILL_3": "Independent_066_GILL_3", "SAD_067_PAYAL": "SAD_067_PAYAL", "INC_067_PAYAL": "INC_067_PAYAL", "PPOP_067_PAYAL": "PPOP_067_PAYAL", "BSP_067_PAYAL": "BSP_067_PAYAL", "SAD_M_067_PAYAL": "SAD_M_067_PAYAL", "Independent_067_PAYAL_1": "Independent_067_PAYAL_1", "BSP_K_067_PAYAL": "BSP_K_067_PAYAL", "Independent_067_PAYAL_2": "Independent_067_PAYAL_2", "SAD_068_DAKHA": "SAD_068_DAKHA", "INC_068_DAKHA": "INC_068_DAKHA", "PPOP_068_DAKHA": "PPOP_068_DAKHA", "BSP_068_DAKHA": "BSP_068_DAKHA", "Independent_068_DAKHA_1": "Independent_068_DAKHA_1", "INC_069_RAIKOT": "INC_069_RAIKOT", "SAD_069_RAIKOT": "SAD_069_RAIKOT", "PPOP_069_RAIKOT": "PPOP_069_RAIKOT", "BSP_069_RAIKOT": "BSP_069_RAIKOT", "Independent_069_RAIKOT_1": "Independent_069_RAIKOT_1", "SAD_070_JAGRAON": "SAD_070_JAGRAON", "INC_070_JAGRAON": "INC_070_JAGRAON", "PPOP_070_JAGRAON": "PPOP_070_JAGRAON", "Independent_070_JAGRAON_1": "Independent_070_JAGRAON_1", "Independent_070_JAGRAON_2": "Independent_070_JAGRAON_2", "BSP_070_JAGRAON": "BSP_070_JAGRAON", "Independent_070_JAGRAON_3": "Independent_070_JAGRAON_3", "SAD_M_070_JAGRAON": "SAD_M_070_JAGRAON", "SAD_071_NIHAL_SINGH_WALA": "SAD_071_NIHAL_SINGH_WALA", "INC_071_NIHAL_SINGH_WALA": "INC_071_NIHAL_SINGH_WALA", "CPI_071_NIHAL_SINGH_WALA": "CPI_071_NIHAL_SINGH_WALA", "Independent_071_NIHAL_SINGH_WALA_1": "Independent_071_NIHAL_SINGH_WALA_1", "BSP_071_NIHAL_SINGH_WALA": "BSP_071_NIHAL_SINGH_WALA", "SAD_M_071_NIHAL_SINGH_WALA": "SAD_M_071_NIHAL_SINGH_WALA", "Independent_071_NIHAL_SINGH_WALA_2": "Independent_071_NIHAL_SINGH_WALA_2", "SAD_072_BHAGHA_PURANA": "SAD_072_BHAGHA_PURANA", "INC_072_BHAGHA_PURANA": "INC_072_BHAGHA_PURANA", "PPOP_072_BHAGHA_PURANA": "PPOP_072_BHAGHA_PURANA", "Independent_072_BHAGHA_PURANA_1": "Independent_072_BHAGHA_PURANA_1", "BSP_072_BHAGHA_PURANA": "BSP_072_BHAGHA_PURANA", "Independent_072_BHAGHA_PURANA_2": "Independent_072_BHAGHA_PURANA_2", "Independent_072_BHAGHA_PURANA_3": "Independent_072_BHAGHA_PURANA_3", "Independent_072_BHAGHA_PURANA_4": "Independent_072_BHAGHA_PURANA_4", "INC_073_MOGA": "INC_073_MOGA", "SAD_073_MOGA": "SAD_073_MOGA", "PPOP_073_MOGA": "PPOP_073_MOGA", "BSP_073_MOGA": "BSP_073_MOGA", "Independent_073_MOGA_1": "Independent_073_MOGA_1", "SHS_073_MOGA": "SHS_073_MOGA", "Independent_073_MOGA_2": "Independent_073_MOGA_2", "Independent_073_MOGA_3": "Independent_073_MOGA_3", "SAD_074_DHARAMKOT": "SAD_074_DHARAMKOT", "INC_074_DHARAMKOT": "INC_074_DHARAMKOT", "PPOP_074_DHARAMKOT": "PPOP_074_DHARAMKOT", "BSP_074_DHARAMKOT": "BSP_074_DHARAMKOT", "Independent_074_DHARAMKOT_1": "Independent_074_DHARAMKOT_1", "MB_S_P_074_DHARAMKOT": "MB_S_P_074_DHARAMKOT", "SAD_M_074_DHARAMKOT": "SAD_M_074_DHARAMKOT", "Independent_074_DHARAMKOT_2": "Independent_074_DHARAMKOT_2", "Independent_074_DHARAMKOT_3": "Independent_074_DHARAMKOT_3", "SAD_075_ZIRA": "SAD_075_ZIRA", "INC_075_ZIRA": "INC_075_ZIRA", "PPOP_075_ZIRA": "PPOP_075_ZIRA", "BSP_075_ZIRA": "BSP_075_ZIRA", "Independent_075_ZIRA_1": "Independent_075_ZIRA_1", "INC_076_FIROZPUR_CITY": "INC_076_FIROZPUR_CITY", "BJP_076_FIROZPUR_CITY": "BJP_076_FIROZPUR_CITY", "Independent_076_FIROZPUR_CITY_1": "Independent_076_FIROZPUR_CITY_1", "PPOP_076_FIROZPUR_CITY": "PPOP_076_FIROZPUR_CITY", "BSP_076_FIROZPUR_CITY": "BSP_076_FIROZPUR_CITY", "Independent_076_FIROZPUR_CITY_2": "Independent_076_FIROZPUR_CITY_2", "Independent_076_FIROZPUR_CITY_3": "Independent_076_FIROZPUR_CITY_3", "Independent_076_FIROZPUR_CITY_4": "Independent_076_FIROZPUR_CITY_4", "SAD_M_076_FIROZPUR_CITY": "SAD_M_076_FIROZPUR_CITY", "Independent_076_FIROZPUR_CITY_5": "Independent_076_FIROZPUR_CITY_5", "LJP_076_FIROZPUR_CITY": "LJP_076_FIROZPUR_CITY", "Independent_076_FIROZPUR_CITY_6": "Independent_076_FIROZPUR_CITY_6", "SAD_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL": "SAD_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL", "INC_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL": "INC_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL", "PPOP_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL": "PPOP_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL", "BSP_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL": "BSP_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL", "Independent_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL_1": "Independent_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL_1", "SAD_M_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL": "SAD_M_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL", "LJP_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL": "LJP_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL", "AIKMM_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL": "AIKMM_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL", "INC_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI": "INC_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI", "SAD_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI": "SAD_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI", "CPI_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI": "CPI_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI", "BSP_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI": "BSP_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI", "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_1": "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_1", "SAD_M_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI": "SAD_M_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI", "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_2": "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_2", "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_3": "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_3", "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_4": "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_4", "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_5": "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_5", "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_6": "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_6", "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_7": "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_7", "SAD_079_JALALABAD": "SAD_079_JALALABAD", "Independent_079_JALALABAD_1": "Independent_079_JALALABAD_1", "INC_079_JALALABAD": "INC_079_JALALABAD", "PPOP_079_JALALABAD": "PPOP_079_JALALABAD", "Independent_079_JALALABAD_2": "Independent_079_JALALABAD_2", "BSP_079_JALALABAD": "BSP_079_JALALABAD", "Independent_079_JALALABAD_3": "Independent_079_JALALABAD_3", "Independent_079_JALALABAD_4": "Independent_079_JALALABAD_4", "Independent_079_JALALABAD_5": "Independent_079_JALALABAD_5", "Independent_079_JALALABAD_6": "Independent_079_JALALABAD_6", "Independent_079_JALALABAD_7": "Independent_079_JALALABAD_7", "Independent_079_JALALABAD_8": "Independent_079_JALALABAD_8", "Independent_079_JALALABAD_9": "Independent_079_JALALABAD_9", "Independent_079_JALALABAD_10": "Independent_079_JALALABAD_10", "Independent_079_JALALABAD_11": "Independent_079_JALALABAD_11", "Independent_079_JALALABAD_12": "Independent_079_JALALABAD_12", "BJP_080_FAZILKA": "BJP_080_FAZILKA", "Independent_080_FAZILKA_1": "Independent_080_FAZILKA_1", "INC_080_FAZILKA": "INC_080_FAZILKA", "BSP_080_FAZILKA": "BSP_080_FAZILKA", "Independent_080_FAZILKA_2": "Independent_080_FAZILKA_2", "CPI_080_FAZILKA": "CPI_080_FAZILKA", "Independent_080_FAZILKA_3": "Independent_080_FAZILKA_3", "Independent_080_FAZILKA_4": "Independent_080_FAZILKA_4", "Independent_080_FAZILKA_5": "Independent_080_FAZILKA_5", "Independent_080_FAZILKA_6": "Independent_080_FAZILKA_6", "INC_081_ABOHAR": "INC_081_ABOHAR", "Independent_081_ABOHAR_1": "Independent_081_ABOHAR_1", "BJP_081_ABOHAR": "BJP_081_ABOHAR", "Independent_081_ABOHAR_2": "Independent_081_ABOHAR_2", "BSP_081_ABOHAR": "BSP_081_ABOHAR", "Independent_081_ABOHAR_3": "Independent_081_ABOHAR_3", "Independent_081_ABOHAR_4": "Independent_081_ABOHAR_4", "Independent_081_ABOHAR_5": "Independent_081_ABOHAR_5", "Independent_081_ABOHAR_6": "Independent_081_ABOHAR_6", "Independent_081_ABOHAR_7": "Independent_081_ABOHAR_7", "Independent_081_ABOHAR_8": "Independent_081_ABOHAR_8", "Independent_081_ABOHAR_9": "Independent_081_ABOHAR_9", "SAD_082_BALLUANA": "SAD_082_BALLUANA", "INC_082_BALLUANA": "INC_082_BALLUANA", "Independent_082_BALLUANA_1": "Independent_082_BALLUANA_1", "PPOP_082_BALLUANA": "PPOP_082_BALLUANA", "BSP_082_BALLUANA": "BSP_082_BALLUANA", "SAD_083_LAMBI": "SAD_083_LAMBI", "INC_083_LAMBI": "INC_083_LAMBI", "PPOP_083_LAMBI": "PPOP_083_LAMBI", "BSP_083_LAMBI": "BSP_083_LAMBI", "Independent_083_LAMBI_1": "Independent_083_LAMBI_1", "Independent_083_LAMBI_2": "Independent_083_LAMBI_2", "SAD_M_083_LAMBI": "SAD_M_083_LAMBI", "Independent_083_LAMBI_3": "Independent_083_LAMBI_3", "Independent_083_LAMBI_4": "Independent_083_LAMBI_4", "PLP_083_LAMBI": "PLP_083_LAMBI", "LJP_083_LAMBI": "LJP_083_LAMBI", "INC_084_GIDDERBAHA": "INC_084_GIDDERBAHA", "SAD_084_GIDDERBAHA": "SAD_084_GIDDERBAHA", "PPOP_084_GIDDERBAHA": "PPOP_084_GIDDERBAHA", "BSP_084_GIDDERBAHA": "BSP_084_GIDDERBAHA", "Independent_084_GIDDERBAHA_1": "Independent_084_GIDDERBAHA_1", "Independent_084_GIDDERBAHA_2": "Independent_084_GIDDERBAHA_2", "Independent_084_GIDDERBAHA_3": "Independent_084_GIDDERBAHA_3", "SAD_M_084_GIDDERBAHA": "SAD_M_084_GIDDERBAHA", "Independent_084_GIDDERBAHA_4": "Independent_084_GIDDERBAHA_4", "Independent_084_GIDDERBAHA_5": "Independent_084_GIDDERBAHA_5", "BGTD_084_GIDDERBAHA": "BGTD_084_GIDDERBAHA", "SAD_085_MALOUT": "SAD_085_MALOUT", "INC_085_MALOUT": "INC_085_MALOUT", "PPOP_085_MALOUT": "PPOP_085_MALOUT", "Independent_085_MALOUT_1": "Independent_085_MALOUT_1", "BSP_085_MALOUT": "BSP_085_MALOUT", "Independent_085_MALOUT_2": "Independent_085_MALOUT_2", "Independent_085_MALOUT_3": "Independent_085_MALOUT_3", "Independent_085_MALOUT_4": "Independent_085_MALOUT_4", "LJP_085_MALOUT": "LJP_085_MALOUT", "Independent_085_MALOUT_5": "Independent_085_MALOUT_5", "Independent_085_MALOUT_6": "Independent_085_MALOUT_6", "INC_086_MUKTSAR": "INC_086_MUKTSAR", "SAD_086_MUKTSAR": "SAD_086_MUKTSAR", "PPOP_086_MUKTSAR": "PPOP_086_MUKTSAR", "BSP_086_MUKTSAR": "BSP_086_MUKTSAR", "Independent_086_MUKTSAR_1": "Independent_086_MUKTSAR_1", "Independent_086_MUKTSAR_2": "Independent_086_MUKTSAR_2", "Independent_086_MUKTSAR_3": "Independent_086_MUKTSAR_3", "LJP_086_MUKTSAR": "LJP_086_MUKTSAR", "SAD_M_086_MUKTSAR": "SAD_M_086_MUKTSAR", "SAD_087_FARIDKOT": "SAD_087_FARIDKOT", "INC_087_FARIDKOT": "INC_087_FARIDKOT", "PPOP_087_FARIDKOT": "PPOP_087_FARIDKOT", "BSP_087_FARIDKOT": "BSP_087_FARIDKOT", "Independent_087_FARIDKOT_1": "Independent_087_FARIDKOT_1", "Independent_087_FARIDKOT_2": "Independent_087_FARIDKOT_2", "Independent_087_FARIDKOT_3": "Independent_087_FARIDKOT_3", "SAD_M_087_FARIDKOT": "SAD_M_087_FARIDKOT", "Independent_087_FARIDKOT_4": "Independent_087_FARIDKOT_4", "Independent_087_FARIDKOT_5": "Independent_087_FARIDKOT_5", "Independent_087_FARIDKOT_6": "Independent_087_FARIDKOT_6", "Independent_087_FARIDKOT_7": "Independent_087_FARIDKOT_7", "Independent_087_FARIDKOT_8": "Independent_087_FARIDKOT_8", "SAD_088_KOTKAPURA": "SAD_088_KOTKAPURA", "INC_088_KOTKAPURA": "INC_088_KOTKAPURA", "Independent_088_KOTKAPURA_1": "Independent_088_KOTKAPURA_1", "PPOP_088_KOTKAPURA": "PPOP_088_KOTKAPURA", "CPI_088_KOTKAPURA": "CPI_088_KOTKAPURA", "BSP_088_KOTKAPURA": "BSP_088_KOTKAPURA", "Independent_088_KOTKAPURA_2": "Independent_088_KOTKAPURA_2", "Independent_088_KOTKAPURA_3": "Independent_088_KOTKAPURA_3", "LJP_088_KOTKAPURA": "LJP_088_KOTKAPURA", "SAD_M_088_KOTKAPURA": "SAD_M_088_KOTKAPURA", "Independent_088_KOTKAPURA_4": "Independent_088_KOTKAPURA_4", "INC_089_JAITU": "INC_089_JAITU", "SAD_089_JAITU": "SAD_089_JAITU", "PPOP_089_JAITU": "PPOP_089_JAITU", "BSP_089_JAITU": "BSP_089_JAITU", "Independent_089_JAITU_1": "Independent_089_JAITU_1", "Independent_089_JAITU_2": "Independent_089_JAITU_2", "Independent_089_JAITU_3": "Independent_089_JAITU_3", "LJP_089_JAITU": "LJP_089_JAITU", "Independent_089_JAITU_4": "Independent_089_JAITU_4", "SAD_090_RAMPURA_PHUL": "SAD_090_RAMPURA_PHUL", "INC_090_RAMPURA_PHUL": "INC_090_RAMPURA_PHUL", "PPOP_090_RAMPURA_PHUL": "PPOP_090_RAMPURA_PHUL", "BSP_090_RAMPURA_PHUL": "BSP_090_RAMPURA_PHUL", "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_1": "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_1", "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_2": "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_2", "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_3": "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_3", "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_4": "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_4", "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_5": "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_5", "SAD_M_090_RAMPURA_PHUL": "SAD_M_090_RAMPURA_PHUL", "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_6": "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_6", "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_7": "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_7", "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_8": "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_8", "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_9": "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_9", "INC_091_BHUCHO_MANDI": "INC_091_BHUCHO_MANDI", "SAD_091_BHUCHO_MANDI": "SAD_091_BHUCHO_MANDI", "PPOP_091_BHUCHO_MANDI": "PPOP_091_BHUCHO_MANDI", "LJP_091_BHUCHO_MANDI": "LJP_091_BHUCHO_MANDI", "BSP_091_BHUCHO_MANDI": "BSP_091_BHUCHO_MANDI", "NCP_091_BHUCHO_MANDI": "NCP_091_BHUCHO_MANDI", "PLP_091_BHUCHO_MANDI": "PLP_091_BHUCHO_MANDI", "CPI_ML_L_091_BHUCHO_MANDI": "CPI_ML_L_091_BHUCHO_MANDI", "SAD_M_091_BHUCHO_MANDI": "SAD_M_091_BHUCHO_MANDI", "SAD_092_BATHINDA_URBAN": "SAD_092_BATHINDA_URBAN", "INC_092_BATHINDA_URBAN": "INC_092_BATHINDA_URBAN", "PPOP_092_BATHINDA_URBAN": "PPOP_092_BATHINDA_URBAN", "Independent_092_BATHINDA_URBAN_1": "Independent_092_BATHINDA_URBAN_1", "BSP_092_BATHINDA_URBAN": "BSP_092_BATHINDA_URBAN", "SHS_092_BATHINDA_URBAN": "SHS_092_BATHINDA_URBAN", "Independent_092_BATHINDA_URBAN_2": "Independent_092_BATHINDA_URBAN_2", "JanSP_092_BATHINDA_URBAN": "JanSP_092_BATHINDA_URBAN", "LJP_092_BATHINDA_URBAN": "LJP_092_BATHINDA_URBAN", "Independent_092_BATHINDA_URBAN_3": "Independent_092_BATHINDA_URBAN_3", "Independent_092_BATHINDA_URBAN_4": "Independent_092_BATHINDA_URBAN_4", "Independent_092_BATHINDA_URBAN_5": "Independent_092_BATHINDA_URBAN_5", "ABSR_092_BATHINDA_URBAN": "ABSR_092_BATHINDA_URBAN", "SAD_093_BATHINDA_RURAL": "SAD_093_BATHINDA_RURAL", "INC_093_BATHINDA_RURAL": "INC_093_BATHINDA_RURAL", "CPI_093_BATHINDA_RURAL": "CPI_093_BATHINDA_RURAL", "LJP_093_BATHINDA_RURAL": "LJP_093_BATHINDA_RURAL", "BSP_093_BATHINDA_RURAL": "BSP_093_BATHINDA_RURAL", "Independent_093_BATHINDA_RURAL_1": "Independent_093_BATHINDA_RURAL_1", "JanSP_093_BATHINDA_RURAL": "JanSP_093_BATHINDA_RURAL", "INC_094_TALWANDI_SABO": "INC_094_TALWANDI_SABO", "SAD_094_TALWANDI_SABO": "SAD_094_TALWANDI_SABO", "PPOP_094_TALWANDI_SABO": "PPOP_094_TALWANDI_SABO", "BSP_094_TALWANDI_SABO": "BSP_094_TALWANDI_SABO", "Independent_094_TALWANDI_SABO_1": "Independent_094_TALWANDI_SABO_1", "Independent_094_TALWANDI_SABO_2": "Independent_094_TALWANDI_SABO_2", "Independent_094_TALWANDI_SABO_3": "Independent_094_TALWANDI_SABO_3", "LJP_094_TALWANDI_SABO": "LJP_094_TALWANDI_SABO", "Independent_094_TALWANDI_SABO_4": "Independent_094_TALWANDI_SABO_4", "SAD_095_MAUR": "SAD_095_MAUR", "INC_095_MAUR": "INC_095_MAUR", "PPOP_095_MAUR": "PPOP_095_MAUR", "BSP_095_MAUR": "BSP_095_MAUR", "CPI_ML_L_095_MAUR": "CPI_ML_L_095_MAUR", "Independent_095_MAUR_1": "Independent_095_MAUR_1", "LJP_095_MAUR": "LJP_095_MAUR", "Independent_095_MAUR_2": "Independent_095_MAUR_2", "SAD_096_MANSA": "SAD_096_MANSA", "INC_096_MANSA": "INC_096_MANSA", "CPI_096_MANSA": "CPI_096_MANSA", "CPI_ML_L_096_MANSA": "CPI_ML_L_096_MANSA", "BSP_096_MANSA": "BSP_096_MANSA", "SP_I_096_MANSA": "SP_I_096_MANSA", "INC_097_SARDULGARH": "INC_097_SARDULGARH", "SAD_097_SARDULGARH": "SAD_097_SARDULGARH", "PPOP_097_SARDULGARH": "PPOP_097_SARDULGARH", "BSP_097_SARDULGARH": "BSP_097_SARDULGARH", "CPI_ML_L_097_SARDULGARH": "CPI_ML_L_097_SARDULGARH", "Independent_097_SARDULGARH_1": "Independent_097_SARDULGARH_1", "SAD_M_097_SARDULGARH": "SAD_M_097_SARDULGARH", "Independent_097_SARDULGARH_2": "Independent_097_SARDULGARH_2", "SAD_098_BUDHLADA": "SAD_098_BUDHLADA", "INC_098_BUDHLADA": "INC_098_BUDHLADA", "PPOP_098_BUDHLADA": "PPOP_098_BUDHLADA", "BSP_098_BUDHLADA": "BSP_098_BUDHLADA", "CPI_ML_L_098_BUDHLADA": "CPI_ML_L_098_BUDHLADA", "Independent_098_BUDHLADA_1": "Independent_098_BUDHLADA_1", "SAD_M_098_BUDHLADA": "SAD_M_098_BUDHLADA", "INC_099_LEHRA": "INC_099_LEHRA", "SAD_099_LEHRA": "SAD_099_LEHRA", "PPOP_099_LEHRA": "PPOP_099_LEHRA", "BSP_099_LEHRA": "BSP_099_LEHRA", "Independent_099_LEHRA_1": "Independent_099_LEHRA_1", "Independent_099_LEHRA_2": "Independent_099_LEHRA_2", "Independent_099_LEHRA_3": "Independent_099_LEHRA_3", "Independent_099_LEHRA_4": "Independent_099_LEHRA_4", "Independent_099_LEHRA_5": "Independent_099_LEHRA_5", "Independent_099_LEHRA_6": "Independent_099_LEHRA_6", "SAD_100_DIRBA": "SAD_100_DIRBA", "INC_100_DIRBA": "INC_100_DIRBA", "PPOP_100_DIRBA": "PPOP_100_DIRBA", "BSP_100_DIRBA": "BSP_100_DIRBA", "Independent_100_DIRBA_1": "Independent_100_DIRBA_1", "SAD_M_100_DIRBA": "SAD_M_100_DIRBA", "CPI_ML_L_100_DIRBA": "CPI_ML_L_100_DIRBA", "Independent_100_DIRBA_2": "Independent_100_DIRBA_2", "Independent_100_DIRBA_3": "Independent_100_DIRBA_3", "BSP_A_100_DIRBA": "BSP_A_100_DIRBA", "Independent_100_DIRBA_4": "Independent_100_DIRBA_4", "SAD_101_SUNAM": "SAD_101_SUNAM", "INC_101_SUNAM": "INC_101_SUNAM", "PPOP_101_SUNAM": "PPOP_101_SUNAM", "BSP_101_SUNAM": "BSP_101_SUNAM", "Independent_101_SUNAM_1": "Independent_101_SUNAM_1", "SAD_M_101_SUNAM": "SAD_M_101_SUNAM", "Independent_101_SUNAM_2": "Independent_101_SUNAM_2", "Independent_101_SUNAM_3": "Independent_101_SUNAM_3", "Independent_101_SUNAM_4": "Independent_101_SUNAM_4", "Independent_101_SUNAM_5": "Independent_101_SUNAM_5", "INC_102_BHADAUR": "INC_102_BHADAUR", "SAD_102_BHADAUR": "SAD_102_BHADAUR", "CPI_102_BHADAUR": "CPI_102_BHADAUR", "BSP_102_BHADAUR": "BSP_102_BHADAUR", "SAD_M_102_BHADAUR": "SAD_M_102_BHADAUR", "CPI_ML_L_102_BHADAUR": "CPI_ML_L_102_BHADAUR", "Independent_102_BHADAUR_1": "Independent_102_BHADAUR_1", "Independent_102_BHADAUR_2": "Independent_102_BHADAUR_2", "Independent_102_BHADAUR_3": "Independent_102_BHADAUR_3", "LJP_102_BHADAUR": "LJP_102_BHADAUR", "Independent_102_BHADAUR_4": "Independent_102_BHADAUR_4", "BSP_A_102_BHADAUR": "BSP_A_102_BHADAUR", "INC_103_BARNALA": "INC_103_BARNALA", "SAD_103_BARNALA": "SAD_103_BARNALA", "PPOP_103_BARNALA": "PPOP_103_BARNALA", "BSP_103_BARNALA": "BSP_103_BARNALA", "Independent_103_BARNALA_1": "Independent_103_BARNALA_1", "SAD_M_103_BARNALA": "SAD_M_103_BARNALA", "Independent_103_BARNALA_2": "Independent_103_BARNALA_2", "LJP_103_BARNALA": "LJP_103_BARNALA", "Independent_103_BARNALA_3": "Independent_103_BARNALA_3", "Independent_103_BARNALA_4": "Independent_103_BARNALA_4", "Independent_103_BARNALA_5": "Independent_103_BARNALA_5", "INC_104_MEHAL_KALAN": "INC_104_MEHAL_KALAN", "SAD_104_MEHAL_KALAN": "SAD_104_MEHAL_KALAN", "PPOP_104_MEHAL_KALAN": "PPOP_104_MEHAL_KALAN", "BSP_104_MEHAL_KALAN": "BSP_104_MEHAL_KALAN", "SAD_M_104_MEHAL_KALAN": "SAD_M_104_MEHAL_KALAN", "AISBJSMD_104_MEHAL_KALAN": "AISBJSMD_104_MEHAL_KALAN", "LJP_104_MEHAL_KALAN": "LJP_104_MEHAL_KALAN", "SAD_105_MALERKOTLA": "SAD_105_MALERKOTLA", "INC_105_MALERKOTLA": "INC_105_MALERKOTLA", "BSP_105_MALERKOTLA": "BSP_105_MALERKOTLA", "CPM_105_MALERKOTLA": "CPM_105_MALERKOTLA", "Independent_105_MALERKOTLA_1": "Independent_105_MALERKOTLA_1", "LJP_105_MALERKOTLA": "LJP_105_MALERKOTLA", "Independent_105_MALERKOTLA_2": "Independent_105_MALERKOTLA_2", "Independent_105_MALERKOTLA_3": "Independent_105_MALERKOTLA_3", "Independent_105_MALERKOTLA_4": "Independent_105_MALERKOTLA_4", "Independent_105_MALERKOTLA_5": "Independent_105_MALERKOTLA_5", "SAD_106_AMARGARH": "SAD_106_AMARGARH", "INC_106_AMARGARH": "INC_106_AMARGARH", "PPOP_106_AMARGARH": "PPOP_106_AMARGARH", "BSP_106_AMARGARH": "BSP_106_AMARGARH", "Independent_106_AMARGARH_1": "Independent_106_AMARGARH_1", "Independent_106_AMARGARH_2": "Independent_106_AMARGARH_2", "Independent_106_AMARGARH_3": "Independent_106_AMARGARH_3", "Independent_106_AMARGARH_4": "Independent_106_AMARGARH_4", "Independent_106_AMARGARH_5": "Independent_106_AMARGARH_5", "SAD_M_106_AMARGARH": "SAD_M_106_AMARGARH", "Independent_106_AMARGARH_6": "Independent_106_AMARGARH_6", "LJP_106_AMARGARH": "LJP_106_AMARGARH", "Independent_106_AMARGARH_7": "Independent_106_AMARGARH_7", "INC_107_DHURI": "INC_107_DHURI", "SAD_107_DHURI": "SAD_107_DHURI", "PPOP_107_DHURI": "PPOP_107_DHURI", "BSP_107_DHURI": "BSP_107_DHURI", "Independent_107_DHURI_1": "Independent_107_DHURI_1", "Independent_107_DHURI_2": "Independent_107_DHURI_2", "Independent_107_DHURI_3": "Independent_107_DHURI_3", "LJP_107_DHURI": "LJP_107_DHURI", "SAD_108_SANGRUR": "SAD_108_SANGRUR", "INC_108_SANGRUR": "INC_108_SANGRUR", "PPOP_108_SANGRUR": "PPOP_108_SANGRUR", "BSP_108_SANGRUR": "BSP_108_SANGRUR", "Independent_108_SANGRUR_1": "Independent_108_SANGRUR_1", "SAD_M_108_SANGRUR": "SAD_M_108_SANGRUR", "Independent_108_SANGRUR_2": "Independent_108_SANGRUR_2", "Independent_108_SANGRUR_3": "Independent_108_SANGRUR_3", "INC_109_NABHA": "INC_109_NABHA", "SAD_109_NABHA": "SAD_109_NABHA", "CPI_109_NABHA": "CPI_109_NABHA", "BSP_109_NABHA": "BSP_109_NABHA", "Independent_109_NABHA_1": "Independent_109_NABHA_1", "Independent_109_NABHA_2": "Independent_109_NABHA_2", "SAD_M_109_NABHA": "SAD_M_109_NABHA", "Independent_109_NABHA_3": "Independent_109_NABHA_3", "LJP_109_NABHA": "LJP_109_NABHA", "Independent_109_NABHA_4": "Independent_109_NABHA_4", "Independent_109_NABHA_5": "Independent_109_NABHA_5", "INC_110_PATIALA_RURAL": "INC_110_PATIALA_RURAL", "SAD_110_PATIALA_RURAL": "SAD_110_PATIALA_RURAL", "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_1": "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_1", "PPOP_110_PATIALA_RURAL": "PPOP_110_PATIALA_RURAL", "BSP_110_PATIALA_RURAL": "BSP_110_PATIALA_RURAL", "BRSP_110_PATIALA_RURAL": "BRSP_110_PATIALA_RURAL", "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_2": "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_2", "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_3": "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_3", "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_4": "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_4", "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_5": "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_5", "NCP_110_PATIALA_RURAL": "NCP_110_PATIALA_RURAL", "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_6": "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_6", "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_7": "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_7", "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_8": "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_8", "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_9": "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_9", "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_10": "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_10", "INC_111_RAJPURA": "INC_111_RAJPURA", "BJP_111_RAJPURA": "BJP_111_RAJPURA", "PPOP_111_RAJPURA": "PPOP_111_RAJPURA", "BSP_111_RAJPURA": "BSP_111_RAJPURA", "Independent_111_RAJPURA_1": "Independent_111_RAJPURA_1", "Independent_111_RAJPURA_2": "Independent_111_RAJPURA_2", "SHS_111_RAJPURA": "SHS_111_RAJPURA", "Independent_111_RAJPURA_3": "Independent_111_RAJPURA_3", "SAD_M_111_RAJPURA": "SAD_M_111_RAJPURA", "Independent_111_RAJPURA_4": "Independent_111_RAJPURA_4", "BRSP_111_RAJPURA": "BRSP_111_RAJPURA", "Independent_111_RAJPURA_5": "Independent_111_RAJPURA_5", "SAD_112_DERA_BASSI": "SAD_112_DERA_BASSI", "Independent_112_DERA_BASSI_1": "Independent_112_DERA_BASSI_1", "INC_112_DERA_BASSI": "INC_112_DERA_BASSI", "Independent_112_DERA_BASSI_2": "Independent_112_DERA_BASSI_2", "BSP_112_DERA_BASSI": "BSP_112_DERA_BASSI", "PPOP_112_DERA_BASSI": "PPOP_112_DERA_BASSI", "Independent_112_DERA_BASSI_3": "Independent_112_DERA_BASSI_3", "Independent_112_DERA_BASSI_4": "Independent_112_DERA_BASSI_4", "Independent_112_DERA_BASSI_5": "Independent_112_DERA_BASSI_5", "SAD_113_GHANAUR": "SAD_113_GHANAUR", "INC_113_GHANAUR": "INC_113_GHANAUR", "BSP_113_GHANAUR": "BSP_113_GHANAUR", "Independent_113_GHANAUR_1": "Independent_113_GHANAUR_1", "Independent_113_GHANAUR_2": "Independent_113_GHANAUR_2", "CPM_113_GHANAUR": "CPM_113_GHANAUR", "Independent_113_GHANAUR_3": "Independent_113_GHANAUR_3", "SAD_M_113_GHANAUR": "SAD_M_113_GHANAUR", "Independent_113_GHANAUR_4": "Independent_113_GHANAUR_4", "INC_114_SANOUR": "INC_114_SANOUR", "SAD_114_SANOUR": "SAD_114_SANOUR", "BSP_114_SANOUR": "BSP_114_SANOUR", "Independent_114_SANOUR_1": "Independent_114_SANOUR_1", "SAD_M_114_SANOUR": "SAD_M_114_SANOUR", "Independent_114_SANOUR_2": "Independent_114_SANOUR_2", "Independent_114_SANOUR_3": "Independent_114_SANOUR_3", "Independent_114_SANOUR_4": "Independent_114_SANOUR_4", "BRSP_114_SANOUR": "BRSP_114_SANOUR", "INC_115_PATIALA": "INC_115_PATIALA", "SAD_115_PATIALA": "SAD_115_PATIALA", "PPOP_115_PATIALA": "PPOP_115_PATIALA", "BSP_115_PATIALA": "BSP_115_PATIALA", "Independent_115_PATIALA_1": "Independent_115_PATIALA_1", "Independent_115_PATIALA_2": "Independent_115_PATIALA_2", "BRSP_115_PATIALA": "BRSP_115_PATIALA", "Independent_115_PATIALA_3": "Independent_115_PATIALA_3", "Independent_115_PATIALA_4": "Independent_115_PATIALA_4", "SAD_116_SAMANA": "SAD_116_SAMANA", "INC_116_SAMANA": "INC_116_SAMANA", "BSP_116_SAMANA": "BSP_116_SAMANA", "PPOP_116_SAMANA": "PPOP_116_SAMANA", "Independent_116_SAMANA_1": "Independent_116_SAMANA_1", "SAD_M_116_SAMANA": "SAD_M_116_SAMANA", "BRSP_116_SAMANA": "BRSP_116_SAMANA", "Independent_116_SAMANA_2": "Independent_116_SAMANA_2", "SAD_117_SHUTRANA": "SAD_117_SHUTRANA", "INC_117_SHUTRANA": "INC_117_SHUTRANA", "PPOP_117_SHUTRANA": "PPOP_117_SHUTRANA", "BSP_117_SHUTRANA": "BSP_117_SHUTRANA", "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_1": "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_1", "SAD_M_117_SHUTRANA": "SAD_M_117_SHUTRANA", "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_2": "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_2", "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_3": "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_3", "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_4": "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_4", "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_5": "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_5", "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_6": "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_6", "BSP_A_117_SHUTRANA": "BSP_A_117_SHUTRANA", "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_7": "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_7"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 117, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 117, "registered_not_positive": 117}, "n_stations_flagged": 117, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:51:52.885326", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.646, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.666, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.659, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.525, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.444, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.659, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.409, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.409, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.582, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "96c16c3e2a90442a90fa45d24f1782b0", "name": "India 2014 local (overnight india-haryana-2014-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2014, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Haryana/Haryana_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"BJP": "BJP", "INLD": "INLD", "INC": "INC", "BSP": "BSP", "HJCPV": "HJCPV", "Independent_001_1": "Independent_001_1", "Independent_001_2": "Independent_001_2", "NOTA": "NOTA", "Independent_001_3": "Independent_001_3", "Independent_001_4": "Independent_001_4", "HALP": "HALP", "RASLP": "RASLP", "SMBHP": "SMBHP", "Independent_002_1": "Independent_002_1", "HJCBL": "HJCBL", "Independent_002_2": "Independent_002_2", "CPM": "CPM", "Independent_002_3": "Independent_002_3", "CPI": "CPI", "Independent_002_4": "Independent_002_4", "Independent_002_5": "Independent_002_5", "Independent_002_6": "Independent_002_6", "Independent_002_7": "Independent_002_7", "Independent_002_8": "Independent_002_8", "Independent_002_9": "Independent_002_9", "BSCP": "BSCP", "Independent_004_1": "Independent_004_1", "Independent_004_2": "Independent_004_2", "Independent_004_3": "Independent_004_3", "NAJC": "NAJC", "Independent_004_4": "Independent_004_4", "Independent_004_5": "Independent_004_5", "SAD": "SAD", "Independent_005_1": "Independent_005_1", "Independent_005_2": "Independent_005_2", "Independent_005_3": "Independent_005_3", "Independent_005_4": "Independent_005_4", "Independent_005_5": "Independent_005_5", "Independent_005_6": "Independent_005_6", "Independent_005_7": "Independent_005_7", "Independent_006_1": "Independent_006_1", "Independent_006_2": "Independent_006_2", "Independent_007_1": "Independent_007_1", "SP": "SP", "Independent_007_2": "Independent_007_2", "HRKD": "HRKD", "Independent_008_1": "Independent_008_1", "Independent_008_2": "Independent_008_2", "Independent_008_3": "Independent_008_3", "Independent_008_4": "Independent_008_4", "Independent_008_5": "Independent_008_5", "Independent_008_6": "Independent_008_6", "Independent_008_7": "Independent_008_7", "Independent_008_8": "Independent_008_8", "Independent_008_9": "Independent_008_9", "Independent_008_10": "Independent_008_10", "Independent_009_1": "Independent_009_1", "Independent_009_2": "Independent_009_2", "Independent_010_1": "Independent_010_1", "Independent_010_2": "Independent_010_2", "Independent_010_3": "Independent_010_3", "Independent_010_4": "Independent_010_4", "Independent_010_5": "Independent_010_5", "Independent_011_1": "Independent_011_1", "Independent_011_2": "Independent_011_2", "Independent_011_3": "Independent_011_3", "Independent_011_4": "Independent_011_4", "Independent_011_5": "Independent_011_5", "RJP_E": "RJP_E", "Independent_013_1": "Independent_013_1", "Independent_013_2": "Independent_013_2", "Independent_013_3": "Independent_013_3", "BMUP": "BMUP", "SAD_M": "SAD_M", "Independent_013_4": "Independent_013_4", "Independent_013_5": "Independent_013_5", "Independent_014_1": "Independent_014_1", "SUCI": "SUCI", "Independent_014_2": "Independent_014_2", "Independent_014_3": "Independent_014_3", "Independent_014_4": "Independent_014_4", "Independent_015_1": "Independent_015_1", "Independent_015_2": "Independent_015_2", "Independent_015_3": "Independent_015_3", "Independent_016_1": "Independent_016_1", "Independent_016_2": "Independent_016_2", "Independent_016_3": "Independent_016_3", "Independent_016_4": "Independent_016_4", "Independent_016_5": "Independent_016_5", "Independent_016_6": "Independent_016_6", "Independent_016_7": "Independent_016_7", "Independent_016_8": "Independent_016_8", "Independent_016_9": "Independent_016_9", "Independent_016_10": "Independent_016_10", "Independent_016_11": "Independent_016_11", "Independent_017_1": "Independent_017_1", "Independent_017_2": "Independent_017_2", "Independent_017_3": "Independent_017_3", "Independent_017_4": "Independent_017_4", "Independent_017_5": "Independent_017_5", "Independent_018_1": "Independent_018_1", "Independent_018_2": "Independent_018_2", "Independent_018_3": "Independent_018_3", "Independent_018_4": "Independent_018_4", "Independent_018_5": "Independent_018_5", "Independent_018_6": "Independent_018_6", "Independent_018_7": "Independent_018_7", "Independent_018_8": "Independent_018_8", "Independent_018_9": "Independent_018_9", "Independent_018_10": "Independent_018_10", "Independent_018_11": "Independent_018_11", "Independent_018_12": "Independent_018_12", "Independent_019_1": "Independent_019_1", "Independent_019_2": "Independent_019_2", "Independent_019_3": "Independent_019_3", "Independent_019_4": "Independent_019_4", "Independent_019_5": "Independent_019_5", "RGD": "RGD", "Independent_019_6": "Independent_019_6", "Independent_019_7": "Independent_019_7", "BIP": "BIP", "Independent_020_1": "Independent_020_1", "Independent_020_2": "Independent_020_2", "Independent_020_3": "Independent_020_3", "Independent_020_4": "Independent_020_4", "Independent_020_5": "Independent_020_5", "Independent_020_6": "Independent_020_6", "Independent_020_7": "Independent_020_7", "Independent_020_8": "Independent_020_8", "Independent_020_9": "Independent_020_9", "Independent_021_1": "Independent_021_1", "Independent_021_2": "Independent_021_2", "Independent_021_3": "Independent_021_3", "Independent_021_4": "Independent_021_4", "SJSP": "SJSP", "CPI_ML_L": "CPI_ML_L", "Independent_022_1": "Independent_022_1", "Independent_022_2": "Independent_022_2", "Independent_022_3": "Independent_022_3", "RARS": "RARS", "Independent_022_4": "Independent_022_4", "Independent_023_1": "Independent_023_1", "Independent_023_2": "Independent_023_2", "Independent_023_3": "Independent_023_3", "Independent_023_4": "Independent_023_4", "Independent_023_5": "Independent_023_5", "Independent_023_6": "Independent_023_6", "Independent_023_7": "Independent_023_7", "Independent_023_8": "Independent_023_8", "Independent_023_9": "Independent_023_9", "Independent_023_10": "Independent_023_10", "Independent_023_11": "Independent_023_11", "Independent_023_12": "Independent_023_12", "Independent_023_13": "Independent_023_13", "Independent_023_14": "Independent_023_14", "AJNSP": "AJNSP", "Independent_023_15": "Independent_023_15", "Independent_023_16": "Independent_023_16", "Independent_023_17": "Independent_023_17", "Independent_024_1": "Independent_024_1", "Independent_024_2": "Independent_024_2", "Independent_024_3": "Independent_024_3", "Independent_024_4": "Independent_024_4", "Independent_024_5": "Independent_024_5", "Independent_024_6": "Independent_024_6", "Independent_024_7": "Independent_024_7", "Independent_024_8": "Independent_024_8", "Independent_024_9": "Independent_024_9", "Independent_024_10": "Independent_024_10", "Independent_024_11": "Independent_024_11", "Independent_024_12": "Independent_024_12", "Independent_024_13": "Independent_024_13", "Independent_025_1": "Independent_025_1", "RPI_A": "RPI_A", "Independent_025_2": "Independent_025_2", "Independent_025_3": "Independent_025_3", "Independent_027_1": "Independent_027_1", "Independent_027_2": "Independent_027_2", "Independent_027_3": "Independent_027_3", "Independent_027_4": "Independent_027_4", "Independent_027_5": "Independent_027_5", "Independent_028_1": "Independent_028_1", "Independent_028_2": "Independent_028_2", "Independent_028_3": "Independent_028_3", "RVNP": "RVNP", "Independent_029_1": "Independent_029_1", "Independent_029_2": "Independent_029_2", "Independent_029_3": "Independent_029_3", "Independent_029_4": "Independent_029_4", "Independent_029_5": "Independent_029_5", "Independent_029_6": "Independent_029_6", "Independent_029_7": "Independent_029_7", "Independent_029_8": "Independent_029_8", "Independent_030_1": "Independent_030_1", "Independent_030_2": "Independent_030_2", "PHRC": "PHRC", "Independent_031_1": "Independent_031_1", "Independent_031_2": "Independent_031_2", "Independent_031_3": "Independent_031_3", "Independent_031_4": "Independent_031_4", "Independent_031_5": "Independent_031_5", "Independent_031_6": "Independent_031_6", "Independent_031_7": "Independent_031_7", "Independent_031_8": "Independent_031_8", "Independent_031_9": "Independent_031_9", "Independent_031_10": "Independent_031_10", "Independent_031_11": "Independent_031_11", "Independent_032_1": "Independent_032_1", "Independent_032_2": "Independent_032_2", "Independent_032_3": "Independent_032_3", "Independent_032_4": "Independent_032_4", "Independent_032_5": "Independent_032_5", "Independent_032_6": "Independent_032_6", "Independent_032_7": "Independent_032_7", "Independent_033_1": "Independent_033_1", "Independent_033_2": "Independent_033_2", "Independent_033_3": "Independent_033_3", "Independent_033_4": "Independent_033_4", "Independent_033_5": "Independent_033_5", "KAJP": "KAJP", "Independent_033_6": "Independent_033_6", "Independent_033_7": "Independent_033_7", "Independent_033_8": "Independent_033_8", "Independent_033_9": "Independent_033_9", "Independent_033_10": "Independent_033_10", "Independent_034_1": "Independent_034_1", "Independent_034_2": "Independent_034_2", "Independent_034_3": "Independent_034_3", "Independent_035_1": "Independent_035_1", "Independent_035_2": "Independent_035_2", "Independent_035_3": "Independent_035_3", "Independent_035_4": "Independent_035_4", "Independent_035_5": "Independent_035_5", "RMEP": "RMEP", "Independent_036_1": "Independent_036_1", "Independent_036_2": "Independent_036_2", "Independent_036_3": "Independent_036_3", "Independent_036_4": "Independent_036_4", "Independent_036_5": "Independent_036_5", "Independent_036_6": "Independent_036_6", "Independent_036_7": "Independent_036_7", "Independent_037_1": "Independent_037_1", "Independent_037_2": "Independent_037_2", "RASAP": "RASAP", "Independent_038_1": "Independent_038_1", "Independent_038_2": "Independent_038_2", "Independent_038_3": "Independent_038_3", "Independent_038_4": "Independent_038_4", "Independent_038_5": "Independent_038_5", "Independent_039_1": "Independent_039_1", "Independent_039_2": "Independent_039_2", "Independent_039_3": "Independent_039_3", "Independent_039_4": "Independent_039_4", "Independent_039_5": "Independent_039_5", "Independent_039_6": "Independent_039_6", "Independent_039_7": "Independent_039_7", "Independent_039_8": "Independent_039_8", "Independent_039_9": "Independent_039_9", "Independent_039_10": "Independent_039_10", "RBC": "RBC", "Independent_040_1": "Independent_040_1", "Independent_040_2": "Independent_040_2", "Independent_040_3": "Independent_040_3", "Independent_040_4": "Independent_040_4", "Independent_040_5": "Independent_040_5", "Independent_040_6": "Independent_040_6", "Independent_040_7": "Independent_040_7", "Independent_040_8": "Independent_040_8", "Independent_040_9": "Independent_040_9", "Independent_040_10": "Independent_040_10", "Independent_040_11": "Independent_040_11", "BHSMP": "BHSMP", "Independent_040_12": "Independent_040_12", "Independent_040_13": "Independent_040_13", "Independent_040_14": "Independent_040_14", "Independent_040_15": "Independent_040_15", "Independent_040_16": "Independent_040_16", "Independent_040_17": "Independent_040_17", "Independent_041_1": "Independent_041_1", "Independent_041_2": "Independent_041_2", "Independent_041_3": "Independent_041_3", "Independent_041_4": "Independent_041_4", "Independent_041_5": "Independent_041_5", "Independent_041_6": "Independent_041_6", "Independent_041_7": "Independent_041_7", "Independent_042_1": "Independent_042_1", "Independent_043_1": "Independent_043_1", "Independent_043_2": "Independent_043_2", "Independent_043_3": "Independent_043_3", "Independent_043_4": "Independent_043_4", "Independent_043_5": "Independent_043_5", "Independent_043_6": "Independent_043_6", "Independent_043_7": "Independent_043_7", "Independent_044_1": "Independent_044_1", "Independent_045_1": "Independent_045_1", "Independent_045_2": "Independent_045_2", "Independent_045_3": "Independent_045_3", "Independent_045_4": "Independent_045_4", "Independent_045_5": "Independent_045_5", "Independent_045_6": "Independent_045_6", "Independent_045_7": "Independent_045_7", "Independent_045_8": "Independent_045_8", "Independent_046_1": "Independent_046_1", "Independent_046_2": "Independent_046_2", "Independent_046_3": "Independent_046_3", "Independent_046_4": "Independent_046_4", "Independent_046_5": "Independent_046_5", "Independent_046_6": "Independent_046_6", "Independent_046_7": "Independent_046_7", "Independent_046_8": "Independent_046_8", "Independent_047_1": "Independent_047_1", "Independent_047_2": "Independent_047_2", "Independent_047_3": "Independent_047_3", "Independent_047_4": "Independent_047_4", "Independent_047_5": "Independent_047_5", "Independent_048_1": "Independent_048_1", "Independent_048_2": "Independent_048_2", "Independent_049_1": "Independent_049_1", "Independent_049_2": "Independent_049_2", "Independent_049_3": "Independent_049_3", "Independent_049_4": "Independent_049_4", "Independent_049_5": "Independent_049_5", "Independent_049_6": "Independent_049_6", "Independent_049_7": "Independent_049_7", "Independent_049_8": "Independent_049_8", "Independent_049_9": "Independent_049_9", "Independent_049_10": "Independent_049_10", "Independent_049_11": "Independent_049_11", "Independent_049_12": "Independent_049_12", "Independent_049_13": "Independent_049_13", "Independent_049_14": "Independent_049_14", "Independent_050_1": "Independent_050_1", "RPP_LB": "RPP_LB", "Independent_050_2": "Independent_050_2", "Independent_050_3": "Independent_050_3", "Independent_050_4": "Independent_050_4", "Independent_050_5": "Independent_050_5", "Independent_050_6": "Independent_050_6", "Independent_050_7": "Independent_050_7", "Independent_050_8": "Independent_050_8", "Independent_050_9": "Independent_050_9", "Independent_051_1": "Independent_051_1", "Independent_051_2": "Independent_051_2", "Independent_051_3": "Independent_051_3", "Independent_051_4": "Independent_051_4", "Independent_051_5": "Independent_051_5", "Independent_051_6": "Independent_051_6", "Independent_051_7": "Independent_051_7", "Independent_051_8": "Independent_051_8", "Independent_051_9": "Independent_051_9", "Independent_052_1": "Independent_052_1", "Independent_052_2": "Independent_052_2", "Independent_052_3": "Independent_052_3", "Independent_052_4": "Independent_052_4", "Independent_052_5": "Independent_052_5", "Independent_052_6": "Independent_052_6", "Independent_052_7": "Independent_052_7", "Independent_052_8": "Independent_052_8", "Independent_052_9": "Independent_052_9", "Independent_052_10": "Independent_052_10", "Independent_052_11": "Independent_052_11", "Independent_052_12": "Independent_052_12", "Independent_052_13": "Independent_052_13", "Independent_052_14": "Independent_052_14", "Independent_052_15": "Independent_052_15", "Independent_053_1": "Independent_053_1", "Independent_053_2": "Independent_053_2", "Independent_053_3": "Independent_053_3", "Independent_053_4": "Independent_053_4", "Independent_053_5": "Independent_053_5", "Independent_053_6": "Independent_053_6", "Independent_053_7": "Independent_053_7", "Independent_053_8": "Independent_053_8", "Independent_053_9": "Independent_053_9", "Independent_053_10": "Independent_053_10", "Independent_054_1": "Independent_054_1", "Independent_054_2": "Independent_054_2", "Independent_054_3": "Independent_054_3", "Independent_054_4": "Independent_054_4", "Independent_054_5": "Independent_054_5", "Independent_054_6": "Independent_054_6", "Independent_054_7": "Independent_054_7", "Independent_054_8": "Independent_054_8", "Independent_054_9": "Independent_054_9", "Independent_054_10": "Independent_054_10", "Independent_054_11": "Independent_054_11", "Independent_054_12": "Independent_054_12", "Independent_055_1": "Independent_055_1", "Independent_055_2": "Independent_055_2", "Independent_055_3": "Independent_055_3", "Independent_055_4": "Independent_055_4", "Independent_055_5": "Independent_055_5", "Independent_056_1": "Independent_056_1", "Independent_056_2": "Independent_056_2", "Independent_056_3": "Independent_056_3", "Independent_056_4": "Independent_056_4", "Independent_056_5": "Independent_056_5", "Independent_056_6": "Independent_056_6", "Independent_056_7": "Independent_056_7", "Independent_056_8": "Independent_056_8", "Independent_057_1": "Independent_057_1", "Independent_057_2": "Independent_057_2", "Independent_057_3": "Independent_057_3", "Independent_057_4": "Independent_057_4", "Independent_057_5": "Independent_057_5", "Independent_057_6": "Independent_057_6", "Independent_057_7": "Independent_057_7", "Independent_057_8": "Independent_057_8", "Independent_057_9": "Independent_057_9", "Independent_057_10": "Independent_057_10", "Independent_057_11": "Independent_057_11", "Independent_057_12": "Independent_057_12", "Independent_057_13": "Independent_057_13", "Independent_057_14": "Independent_057_14", "Independent_057_15": "Independent_057_15", "Independent_057_16": "Independent_057_16", "Independent_057_17": "Independent_057_17", "Independent_057_18": "Independent_057_18", "Independent_057_19": "Independent_057_19", "Independent_058_1": "Independent_058_1", "Independent_058_2": "Independent_058_2", "Independent_058_3": "Independent_058_3", "Independent_058_4": "Independent_058_4", "Independent_058_5": "Independent_058_5", "Independent_058_6": "Independent_058_6", "Independent_058_7": "Independent_058_7", "Independent_058_8": "Independent_058_8", "RKSP": "RKSP", "Independent_058_9": "Independent_058_9", "Independent_058_10": "Independent_058_10", "VIP": "VIP", "Independent_058_11": "Independent_058_11", "Independent_059_1": "Independent_059_1", "Independent_059_2": "Independent_059_2", "Independent_059_3": "Independent_059_3", "Independent_059_4": "Independent_059_4", "Independent_059_5": "Independent_059_5", "Independent_059_6": "Independent_059_6", "Independent_059_7": "Independent_059_7", "Independent_059_8": "Independent_059_8", "Independent_059_9": "Independent_059_9", "Independent_059_10": "Independent_059_10", "Independent_059_11": "Independent_059_11", "Independent_059_12": "Independent_059_12", "Independent_060_1": "Independent_060_1", "Independent_060_2": "Independent_060_2", "Independent_060_3": "Independent_060_3", "Independent_060_4": "Independent_060_4", "Independent_060_5": "Independent_060_5", "Independent_060_6": "Independent_060_6", "Independent_060_7": "Independent_060_7", "Independent_060_8": "Independent_060_8", "Independent_061_1": "Independent_061_1", "Independent_061_2": "Independent_061_2", "Independent_061_3": "Independent_061_3", "Independent_061_4": "Independent_061_4", "Independent_061_5": "Independent_061_5", "Independent_061_6": "Independent_061_6", "Independent_061_7": "Independent_061_7", "Independent_061_8": "Independent_061_8", "Independent_062_1": "Independent_062_1", "Independent_062_2": "Independent_062_2", "Independent_062_3": "Independent_062_3", "Independent_062_4": "Independent_062_4", "Independent_062_5": "Independent_062_5", "Independent_062_6": "Independent_062_6", "Independent_062_7": "Independent_062_7", "Independent_062_8": "Independent_062_8", "Independent_062_9": "Independent_062_9", "Independent_062_10": "Independent_062_10", "Independent_063_1": "Independent_063_1", "Independent_063_2": "Independent_063_2", "Independent_063_3": "Independent_063_3", "Independent_063_4": "Independent_063_4", "Independent_063_5": "Independent_063_5", "AIFB": "AIFB", "Independent_063_6": "Independent_063_6", "Independent_064_1": "Independent_064_1", "Independent_064_2": "Independent_064_2", "Independent_064_3": "Independent_064_3", "Independent_064_4": "Independent_064_4", "Independent_064_5": "Independent_064_5", "Independent_064_6": "Independent_064_6", "Independent_064_7": "Independent_064_7", "Independent_064_8": "Independent_064_8", "Independent_065_1": "Independent_065_1", "Independent_065_2": "Independent_065_2", "Independent_065_3": "Independent_065_3", "Independent_065_4": "Independent_065_4", "Independent_065_5": "Independent_065_5", "Independent_066_1": "Independent_066_1", "Independent_066_2": "Independent_066_2", "Independent_066_3": "Independent_066_3", "Independent_066_4": "Independent_066_4", "Independent_066_5": "Independent_066_5", "Independent_066_6": "Independent_066_6", "Independent_066_7": "Independent_066_7", "Independent_067_1": "Independent_067_1", "Independent_067_2": "Independent_067_2", "Independent_068_1": "Independent_068_1", "Independent_068_2": "Independent_068_2", "Independent_068_3": "Independent_068_3", "Independent_068_4": "Independent_068_4", "Independent_068_5": "Independent_068_5", "Independent_068_6": "Independent_068_6", "Independent_068_7": "Independent_068_7", "Independent_068_8": "Independent_068_8", "Independent_068_9": "Independent_068_9", "Independent_069_1": "Independent_069_1", "Independent_069_2": "Independent_069_2", "Independent_069_3": "Independent_069_3", "Independent_069_4": "Independent_069_4", "Independent_069_5": "Independent_069_5", "JD_U": "JD_U", "Independent_070_1": "Independent_070_1", "Independent_070_2": "Independent_070_2", "Independent_070_3": "Independent_070_3", "Independent_070_4": "Independent_070_4", "Independent_070_5": "Independent_070_5", "Independent_070_6": "Independent_070_6", "Independent_070_7": "Independent_070_7", "Independent_071_1": "Independent_071_1", "Independent_071_2": "Independent_071_2", "Independent_071_3": "Independent_071_3", "Independent_071_4": "Independent_071_4", "Independent_071_5": "Independent_071_5", "Independent_071_6": "Independent_071_6", "Independent_071_7": "Independent_071_7", "Independent_072_1": "Independent_072_1", "Independent_072_2": "Independent_072_2", "Independent_072_3": "Independent_072_3", "Independent_072_4": "Independent_072_4", "Independent_072_5": "Independent_072_5", "Independent_072_6": "Independent_072_6", "Independent_072_7": "Independent_072_7", "Independent_072_8": "Independent_072_8", "Independent_072_9": "Independent_072_9", "Independent_073_1": "Independent_073_1", "Independent_073_2": "Independent_073_2", "Independent_073_3": "Independent_073_3", "Independent_073_4": "Independent_073_4", "Independent_073_5": "Independent_073_5", "Independent_073_6": "Independent_073_6", "Independent_073_7": "Independent_073_7", "Independent_073_8": "Independent_073_8", "Independent_074_1": "Independent_074_1", "Independent_074_2": "Independent_074_2", "Independent_074_3": "Independent_074_3", "Independent_074_4": "Independent_074_4", "Independent_074_5": "Independent_074_5", "Independent_074_6": "Independent_074_6", "Independent_075_1": "Independent_075_1", "Independent_075_2": "Independent_075_2", "Independent_075_3": "Independent_075_3", "Independent_076_1": "Independent_076_1", "Independent_076_2": "Independent_076_2", "Independent_076_3": "Independent_076_3", "Independent_076_4": "Independent_076_4", "Independent_076_5": "Independent_076_5", "Independent_076_6": "Independent_076_6", "Independent_076_7": "Independent_076_7", "Independent_076_8": "Independent_076_8", "Independent_077_1": "Independent_077_1", "Independent_077_2": "Independent_077_2", "Independent_077_3": "Independent_077_3", "Independent_077_4": "Independent_077_4", "Independent_077_5": "Independent_077_5", "Independent_077_6": "Independent_077_6", "Independent_077_7": "Independent_077_7", "Independent_077_8": "Independent_077_8", "Independent_077_9": "Independent_077_9", "Independent_077_10": "Independent_077_10", "Independent_078_1": "Independent_078_1", "Independent_078_2": "Independent_078_2", "Independent_078_3": "Independent_078_3", "Independent_078_4": "Independent_078_4", "Independent_078_5": "Independent_078_5", "Independent_078_6": "Independent_078_6", "Independent_078_7": "Independent_078_7", "Independent_078_8": "Independent_078_8", "Independent_078_9": "Independent_078_9", "Independent_078_10": "Independent_078_10", "Independent_078_11": "Independent_078_11", "Independent_080_1": "Independent_080_1", "Independent_080_2": "Independent_080_2", "Independent_080_3": "Independent_080_3", "Independent_080_4": "Independent_080_4", "Independent_080_5": "Independent_080_5", "Independent_080_6": "Independent_080_6", "Independent_080_7": "Independent_080_7", "Independent_080_8": "Independent_080_8", "Independent_081_1": "Independent_081_1", "Independent_081_2": "Independent_081_2", "Independent_081_3": "Independent_081_3", "Independent_081_4": "Independent_081_4", "Independent_081_5": "Independent_081_5", "Independent_081_6": "Independent_081_6", "Independent_081_7": "Independent_081_7", "Independent_082_1": "Independent_082_1", "Independent_082_2": "Independent_082_2", "Independent_082_3": "Independent_082_3", "Independent_082_4": "Independent_082_4", "Independent_082_5": "Independent_082_5", "RMGP": "RMGP", "Independent_082_6": "Independent_082_6", "Independent_083_1": "Independent_083_1", "Independent_083_2": "Independent_083_2", "Independent_083_3": "Independent_083_3", "TOP": "TOP", "Independent_083_4": "Independent_083_4", "Independent_084_1": "Independent_084_1", "Independent_084_2": "Independent_084_2", "Independent_084_3": "Independent_084_3", "Independent_084_4": "Independent_084_4", "Independent_084_5": "Independent_084_5", "Independent_084_6": "Independent_084_6", "Independent_085_1": "Independent_085_1", "Independent_085_2": "Independent_085_2", "Independent_085_3": "Independent_085_3", "Independent_085_4": "Independent_085_4", "Independent_086_1": "Independent_086_1", "Independent_086_2": "Independent_086_2", "Independent_086_3": "Independent_086_3", "Independent_086_4": "Independent_086_4", "Independent_086_5": "Independent_086_5", "Independent_086_6": "Independent_086_6", "Independent_086_7": "Independent_086_7", "Independent_086_8": "Independent_086_8", "Independent_086_9": "Independent_086_9", "RND": "RND", "Independent_087_1": "Independent_087_1", "Independent_087_2": "Independent_087_2", "Independent_087_3": "Independent_087_3", "Independent_087_4": "Independent_087_4", "Independent_087_5": "Independent_087_5", "Independent_088_1": "Independent_088_1", "Independent_088_2": "Independent_088_2", "Independent_088_3": "Independent_088_3", "Independent_088_4": "Independent_088_4", "AVIRP": "AVIRP", "Independent_089_1": "Independent_089_1", "Independent_089_2": "Independent_089_2", "Independent_090_1": "Independent_090_1", "Independent_090_2": "Independent_090_2", "Independent_090_3": "Independent_090_3", "Independent_090_4": "Independent_090_4", "Independent_090_5": "Independent_090_5"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 90, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 90, "registered_not_positive": 90}, "n_stations_flagged": 90, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:51:46.325095", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.604, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.56, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.617, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.488, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.069, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.658, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.275, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.617, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.617, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.488, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.818, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.576, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.576, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 90}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ba2c5e7179f64c41886f5ff2376416a4", "name": "India 2013 local (overnight india-chhattisgarh-2013-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2013, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Chhattisgarh/Chhattisgarh_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"BJP": "BJP", "INC": "INC", "GGP": "GGP", "Independent_1_BHARATPUR_SONHAT_1": "Independent_1_BHARATPUR_SONHAT_1", "BSP": "BSP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "Independent_1_BHARATPUR_SONHAT_2": "Independent_1_BHARATPUR_SONHAT_2", "Independent_1_BHARATPUR_SONHAT_3": "Independent_1_BHARATPUR_SONHAT_3", "SHS": "SHS", "NCP": "NCP", "Independent_2_MANENDRAGARH_1": "Independent_2_MANENDRAGARH_1", "SP": "SP", "Independent_2_MANENDRAGARH_2": "Independent_2_MANENDRAGARH_2", "SP_I": "SP_I", "CSM": "CSM", "Independent_2_MANENDRAGARH_3": "Independent_2_MANENDRAGARH_3", "RGOP": "RGOP", "Independent_4_PREMNAGAR_1": "Independent_4_PREMNAGAR_1", "JD_U": "JD_U", "Independent_4_PREMNAGAR_2": "Independent_4_PREMNAGAR_2", "Independent_4_PREMNAGAR_3": "Independent_4_PREMNAGAR_3", "CPM": "CPM", "Independent_5_BHATGAON_1": "Independent_5_BHATGAON_1", "Independent_5_BHATGAON_2": "Independent_5_BHATGAON_2", "NPEP": "NPEP", "Independent_5_BHATGAON_3": "Independent_5_BHATGAON_3", "Independent_5_BHATGAON_4": "Independent_5_BHATGAON_4", "Independent_5_BHATGAON_5": "Independent_5_BHATGAON_5", "Independent_5_BHATGAON_6": "Independent_5_BHATGAON_6", "Independent_6_PRATAPPUR_1": "Independent_6_PRATAPPUR_1", "CPI": "CPI", "Independent_6_PRATAPPUR_2": "Independent_6_PRATAPPUR_2", "Independent_6_PRATAPPUR_3": "Independent_6_PRATAPPUR_3", "Independent_6_PRATAPPUR_4": "Independent_6_PRATAPPUR_4", "Independent_6_PRATAPPUR_5": "Independent_6_PRATAPPUR_5", "Independent_6_PRATAPPUR_6": "Independent_6_PRATAPPUR_6", "Independent_6_PRATAPPUR_7": "Independent_6_PRATAPPUR_7", "Independent_7_RAMANUJGANJ_1": "Independent_7_RAMANUJGANJ_1", "Independent_7_RAMANUJGANJ_2": "Independent_7_RAMANUJGANJ_2", "Independent_7_RAMANUJGANJ_3": "Independent_7_RAMANUJGANJ_3", "Independent_7_RAMANUJGANJ_4": "Independent_7_RAMANUJGANJ_4", "Independent_7_RAMANUJGANJ_5": "Independent_7_RAMANUJGANJ_5", "Independent_7_RAMANUJGANJ_6": "Independent_7_RAMANUJGANJ_6", "Independent_7_RAMANUJGANJ_7": "Independent_7_RAMANUJGANJ_7", "Independent_8_SAMRI_1": "Independent_8_SAMRI_1", "Independent_8_SAMRI_2": "Independent_8_SAMRI_2", "Independent_8_SAMRI_3": "Independent_8_SAMRI_3", "Independent_8_SAMRI_4": "Independent_8_SAMRI_4", "Independent_9_LUNDRA_1": "Independent_9_LUNDRA_1", "Independent_9_LUNDRA_2": "Independent_9_LUNDRA_2", "Independent_9_LUNDRA_3": "Independent_9_LUNDRA_3", "Independent_9_LUNDRA_4": "Independent_9_LUNDRA_4", "Independent_10_AMBIKAPUR_1": "Independent_10_AMBIKAPUR_1", "Independent_10_AMBIKAPUR_2": "Independent_10_AMBIKAPUR_2", "Independent_10_AMBIKAPUR_3": "Independent_10_AMBIKAPUR_3", "Independent_10_AMBIKAPUR_4": "Independent_10_AMBIKAPUR_4", "BHDC": "BHDC", "Independent_10_AMBIKAPUR_5": "Independent_10_AMBIKAPUR_5", "Independent_10_AMBIKAPUR_6": "Independent_10_AMBIKAPUR_6", "Independent_11_SITAPUR_1": "Independent_11_SITAPUR_1", "Independent_11_SITAPUR_2": "Independent_11_SITAPUR_2", "Independent_11_SITAPUR_3": "Independent_11_SITAPUR_3", "Independent_11_SITAPUR_4": "Independent_11_SITAPUR_4", "Independent_11_SITAPUR_5": "Independent_11_SITAPUR_5", "Independent_11_SITAPUR_6": "Independent_11_SITAPUR_6", "Independent_12_JASHPUR_1": "Independent_12_JASHPUR_1", "Independent_12_JASHPUR_2": "Independent_12_JASHPUR_2", "Independent_12_JASHPUR_3": "Independent_12_JASHPUR_3", "Independent_13_KUNKURI_1": "Independent_13_KUNKURI_1", "Independent_13_KUNKURI_2": "Independent_13_KUNKURI_2", "Independent_13_KUNKURI_3": "Independent_13_KUNKURI_3", "CSP": "CSP", "Independent_14_PATHALGAON_1": "Independent_14_PATHALGAON_1", "LCPY": "LCPY", "Independent_16_RAIGARH_1": "Independent_16_RAIGARH_1", "Independent_16_RAIGARH_2": "Independent_16_RAIGARH_2", "Independent_16_RAIGARH_3": "Independent_16_RAIGARH_3", "Independent_16_RAIGARH_4": "Independent_16_RAIGARH_4", "Independent_16_RAIGARH_5": "Independent_16_RAIGARH_5", "Independent_16_RAIGARH_6": "Independent_16_RAIGARH_6", "Independent_17_SARANGARH_1": "Independent_17_SARANGARH_1", "Independent_17_SARANGARH_2": "Independent_17_SARANGARH_2", "Independent_17_SARANGARH_3": "Independent_17_SARANGARH_3", "Independent_17_SARANGARH_4": "Independent_17_SARANGARH_4", "BASMM": "BASMM", "SUSP": "SUSP", "Independent_18_KHARSIA_1": "Independent_18_KHARSIA_1", "Independent_18_KHARSIA_2": "Independent_18_KHARSIA_2", "ABGP": "ABGP", "Independent_19_DHARAMJAIGARH_1": "Independent_19_DHARAMJAIGARH_1", "Independent_19_DHARAMJAIGARH_2": "Independent_19_DHARAMJAIGARH_2", "Independent_20_RAMPUR_1": "Independent_20_RAMPUR_1", "Independent_21_KORBA_1": "Independent_21_KORBA_1", "Independent_21_KORBA_2": "Independent_21_KORBA_2", "Independent_21_KORBA_3": "Independent_21_KORBA_3", "Independent_21_KORBA_4": "Independent_21_KORBA_4", "Independent_21_KORBA_5": "Independent_21_KORBA_5", "Independent_21_KORBA_6": "Independent_21_KORBA_6", "RPI_A": "RPI_A", "RABP": "RABP", "LJP": "LJP", "Independent_22_KATGHORA_1": "Independent_22_KATGHORA_1", "Independent_22_KATGHORA_2": "Independent_22_KATGHORA_2", "Independent_22_KATGHORA_3": "Independent_22_KATGHORA_3", "PRCP": "PRCP", "Independent_23_PALI_TANAKHAR_1": "Independent_23_PALI_TANAKHAR_1", "GMS": "GMS", "Independent_24_MARWAHI_1": "Independent_24_MARWAHI_1", "Independent_24_MARWAHI_2": "Independent_24_MARWAHI_2", "Independent_24_MARWAHI_3": "Independent_24_MARWAHI_3", "Independent_24_MARWAHI_4": "Independent_24_MARWAHI_4", "Independent_24_MARWAHI_5": "Independent_24_MARWAHI_5", "Independent_25_KOTA_1": "Independent_25_KOTA_1", "Independent_25_KOTA_2": "Independent_25_KOTA_2", "Independent_25_KOTA_3": "Independent_25_KOTA_3", "Independent_25_KOTA_4": "Independent_25_KOTA_4", "Independent_25_KOTA_5": "Independent_25_KOTA_5", "Independent_25_KOTA_6": "Independent_25_KOTA_6", "Independent_25_KOTA_7": "Independent_25_KOTA_7", "Independent_25_KOTA_8": "Independent_25_KOTA_8", "Independent_25_KOTA_9": "Independent_25_KOTA_9", "Independent_25_KOTA_10": "Independent_25_KOTA_10", "Independent_25_KOTA_11": "Independent_25_KOTA_11", "Independent_25_KOTA_12": "Independent_25_KOTA_12", "Independent_25_KOTA_13": "Independent_25_KOTA_13", "Independent_26_LORMI_1": "Independent_26_LORMI_1", "Independent_26_LORMI_2": "Independent_26_LORMI_2", "Independent_26_LORMI_3": "Independent_26_LORMI_3", "Independent_26_LORMI_4": "Independent_26_LORMI_4", "Independent_26_LORMI_5": "Independent_26_LORMI_5", "Independent_26_LORMI_6": "Independent_26_LORMI_6", "Independent_26_LORMI_7": "Independent_26_LORMI_7", "BHPD": "BHPD", "Independent_26_LORMI_8": "Independent_26_LORMI_8", "Independent_27_MUNGELI_1": "Independent_27_MUNGELI_1", "Independent_27_MUNGELI_2": "Independent_27_MUNGELI_2", "BHBP": "BHBP", "Independent_28_TAKHATPUR_1": "Independent_28_TAKHATPUR_1", "Independent_28_TAKHATPUR_2": "Independent_28_TAKHATPUR_2", "Independent_28_TAKHATPUR_3": "Independent_28_TAKHATPUR_3", "Independent_28_TAKHATPUR_4": "Independent_28_TAKHATPUR_4", "Independent_28_TAKHATPUR_5": "Independent_28_TAKHATPUR_5", "Independent_29_BILHA_1": "Independent_29_BILHA_1", "Independent_29_BILHA_2": "Independent_29_BILHA_2", "Independent_29_BILHA_3": "Independent_29_BILHA_3", "Independent_29_BILHA_4": "Independent_29_BILHA_4", "CPIM": "CPIM", "HJP": "HJP", "Independent_30_BILASPUR_1": "Independent_30_BILASPUR_1", "Independent_30_BILASPUR_2": "Independent_30_BILASPUR_2", "Independent_30_BILASPUR_3": "Independent_30_BILASPUR_3", "Independent_30_BILASPUR_4": "Independent_30_BILASPUR_4", "Independent_30_BILASPUR_5": "Independent_30_BILASPUR_5", "MNDP": "MNDP", "AVIRP": "AVIRP", "Independent_30_BILASPUR_6": "Independent_30_BILASPUR_6", "BSSP": "BSSP", "Independent_31_BELTARA_1": "Independent_31_BELTARA_1", "Independent_31_BELTARA_2": "Independent_31_BELTARA_2", "Independent_31_BELTARA_3": "Independent_31_BELTARA_3", "Independent_31_BELTARA_4": "Independent_31_BELTARA_4", "Independent_31_BELTARA_5": "Independent_31_BELTARA_5", "Independent_31_BELTARA_6": "Independent_31_BELTARA_6", "Independent_31_BELTARA_7": "Independent_31_BELTARA_7", "Independent_32_MASTURI_1": "Independent_32_MASTURI_1", "Independent_32_MASTURI_2": "Independent_32_MASTURI_2", "Independent_32_MASTURI_3": "Independent_32_MASTURI_3", "Independent_33_AKALTARA_1": "Independent_33_AKALTARA_1", "Independent_34_JANJGIR_CHAMPA_1": "Independent_34_JANJGIR_CHAMPA_1", "AA_S_P": "AA_S_P", "Independent_35_SAKTI_1": "Independent_35_SAKTI_1", "Independent_35_SAKTI_2": "Independent_35_SAKTI_2", "Independent_35_SAKTI_3": "Independent_35_SAKTI_3", "Independent_35_SAKTI_4": "Independent_35_SAKTI_4", "Independent_35_SAKTI_5": "Independent_35_SAKTI_5", "Independent_36_CHANDRAPUR_1": "Independent_36_CHANDRAPUR_1", "Independent_36_CHANDRAPUR_2": "Independent_36_CHANDRAPUR_2", "Independent_36_CHANDRAPUR_3": "Independent_36_CHANDRAPUR_3", "BSCP": "BSCP", "SBSP": "SBSP", "Independent_37_JAIJAIPUR_1": "Independent_37_JAIJAIPUR_1", "Independent_37_JAIJAIPUR_2": "Independent_37_JAIJAIPUR_2", "Independent_37_JAIJAIPUR_3": "Independent_37_JAIJAIPUR_3", "Independent_37_JAIJAIPUR_4": "Independent_37_JAIJAIPUR_4", "Independent_38_PAMGARH_1": "Independent_38_PAMGARH_1", "BBP": "BBP", "Independent_39_SARAIPALI_1": "Independent_39_SARAIPALI_1", "AD": "AD", "Independent_41_KHALLARI_1": "Independent_41_KHALLARI_1", "Independent_41_KHALLARI_2": "Independent_41_KHALLARI_2", "Independent_41_KHALLARI_3": "Independent_41_KHALLARI_3", "Independent_41_KHALLARI_4": "Independent_41_KHALLARI_4", "Independent_41_KHALLARI_5": "Independent_41_KHALLARI_5", "Independent_42_MAHASAMUND_1": "Independent_42_MAHASAMUND_1", "Independent_42_MAHASAMUND_2": "Independent_42_MAHASAMUND_2", "Independent_42_MAHASAMUND_3": "Independent_42_MAHASAMUND_3", "Independent_42_MAHASAMUND_4": "Independent_42_MAHASAMUND_4", "Independent_43_BILAIGARH_1": "Independent_43_BILAIGARH_1", "Independent_43_BILAIGARH_2": "Independent_43_BILAIGARH_2", "Independent_44_KASDOL_1": "Independent_44_KASDOL_1", "Independent_44_KASDOL_2": "Independent_44_KASDOL_2", "Independent_44_KASDOL_3": "Independent_44_KASDOL_3", "Independent_44_KASDOL_4": "Independent_44_KASDOL_4", "Independent_44_KASDOL_5": "Independent_44_KASDOL_5", "Independent_44_KASDOL_6": "Independent_44_KASDOL_6", "Independent_44_KASDOL_7": "Independent_44_KASDOL_7", "Independent_44_KASDOL_8": "Independent_44_KASDOL_8", "Independent_44_KASDOL_9": "Independent_44_KASDOL_9", "Independent_44_KASDOL_10": "Independent_44_KASDOL_10", "Independent_45_BALODA_BAZAR_1": "Independent_45_BALODA_BAZAR_1", "Independent_45_BALODA_BAZAR_2": "Independent_45_BALODA_BAZAR_2", "Independent_45_BALODA_BAZAR_3": "Independent_45_BALODA_BAZAR_3", "Independent_45_BALODA_BAZAR_4": "Independent_45_BALODA_BAZAR_4", "Independent_45_BALODA_BAZAR_5": "Independent_45_BALODA_BAZAR_5", "Independent_46_BHATAPARA_1": "Independent_46_BHATAPARA_1", "Independent_46_BHATAPARA_2": "Independent_46_BHATAPARA_2", "Independent_46_BHATAPARA_3": "Independent_46_BHATAPARA_3", "Independent_46_BHATAPARA_4": "Independent_46_BHATAPARA_4", "Independent_46_BHATAPARA_5": "Independent_46_BHATAPARA_5", "Independent_46_BHATAPARA_6": "Independent_46_BHATAPARA_6", "Independent_47_DHARSIWA_1": "Independent_47_DHARSIWA_1", "Independent_47_DHARSIWA_2": "Independent_47_DHARSIWA_2", "CPI_ML_L": "CPI_ML_L", "Independent_48_RAIPUR_CITY_GRAMIN_1": "Independent_48_RAIPUR_CITY_GRAMIN_1", "Independent_48_RAIPUR_CITY_GRAMIN_2": "Independent_48_RAIPUR_CITY_GRAMIN_2", "SSBD": "SSBD", "Independent_48_RAIPUR_CITY_GRAMIN_3": "Independent_48_RAIPUR_CITY_GRAMIN_3", "Independent_48_RAIPUR_CITY_GRAMIN_4": "Independent_48_RAIPUR_CITY_GRAMIN_4", "Independent_49_RAIPUR_CITY_WEST_1": "Independent_49_RAIPUR_CITY_WEST_1", "Independent_49_RAIPUR_CITY_WEST_2": "Independent_49_RAIPUR_CITY_WEST_2", "Independent_49_RAIPUR_CITY_WEST_3": "Independent_49_RAIPUR_CITY_WEST_3", "BSHSP": "BSHSP", "Independent_49_RAIPUR_CITY_WEST_4": "Independent_49_RAIPUR_CITY_WEST_4", "Independent_49_RAIPUR_CITY_WEST_5": "Independent_49_RAIPUR_CITY_WEST_5", "Independent_50_RAIPUR_CITY_NORTH_1": "Independent_50_RAIPUR_CITY_NORTH_1", "Independent_50_RAIPUR_CITY_NORTH_2": "Independent_50_RAIPUR_CITY_NORTH_2", "Independent_50_RAIPUR_CITY_NORTH_3": "Independent_50_RAIPUR_CITY_NORTH_3", "Independent_50_RAIPUR_CITY_NORTH_4": "Independent_50_RAIPUR_CITY_NORTH_4", "Independent_50_RAIPUR_CITY_NORTH_5": "Independent_50_RAIPUR_CITY_NORTH_5", "Independent_50_RAIPUR_CITY_NORTH_6": "Independent_50_RAIPUR_CITY_NORTH_6", "Independent_50_RAIPUR_CITY_NORTH_7": "Independent_50_RAIPUR_CITY_NORTH_7", "Independent_50_RAIPUR_CITY_NORTH_8": "Independent_50_RAIPUR_CITY_NORTH_8", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_1": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_1", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_2": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_2", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_3": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_3", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_4": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_4", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_5": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_5", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_6": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_6", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_7": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_7", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_8": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_8", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_9": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_9", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_10": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_10", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_11": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_11", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_12": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_12", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_13": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_13", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_14": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_14", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_15": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_15", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_16": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_16", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_17": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_17", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_18": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_18", "CHSJP": "CHSJP", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_19": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_19", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_20": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_20", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_21": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_21", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_22": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_22", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_23": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_23", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_24": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_24", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_25": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_25", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_26": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_26", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_27": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_27", "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_28": "Independent_51_RAIPUR_CITY_SOUTH_28", "Independent_52_ARANG_1": "Independent_52_ARANG_1", "Independent_52_ARANG_2": "Independent_52_ARANG_2", "Independent_52_ARANG_3": "Independent_52_ARANG_3", "Independent_52_ARANG_4": "Independent_52_ARANG_4", "Independent_53_ABHANPUR_1": "Independent_53_ABHANPUR_1", "Independent_53_ABHANPUR_2": "Independent_53_ABHANPUR_2", "Independent_54_RAJIM_1": "Independent_54_RAJIM_1", "Independent_54_RAJIM_2": "Independent_54_RAJIM_2", "Independent_55_BINDRANAWAGARH_1": "Independent_55_BINDRANAWAGARH_1", "Independent_56_SIHAWA_1": "Independent_56_SIHAWA_1", "Independent_57_KURUD_1": "Independent_57_KURUD_1", "Independent_57_KURUD_2": "Independent_57_KURUD_2", "Independent_57_KURUD_3": "Independent_57_KURUD_3", "Independent_57_KURUD_4": "Independent_57_KURUD_4", "Independent_57_KURUD_5": "Independent_57_KURUD_5", "BHMP": "BHMP", "Independent_57_KURUD_6": "Independent_57_KURUD_6", "Independent_58_DHAMTARI_1": "Independent_58_DHAMTARI_1", "Independent_58_DHAMTARI_2": "Independent_58_DHAMTARI_2", "Independent_58_DHAMTARI_3": "Independent_58_DHAMTARI_3", "Independent_58_DHAMTARI_4": "Independent_58_DHAMTARI_4", "Independent_58_DHAMTARI_5": "Independent_58_DHAMTARI_5", "Independent_58_DHAMTARI_6": "Independent_58_DHAMTARI_6", "Independent_59_SANJARI_BALOD_1": "Independent_59_SANJARI_BALOD_1", "Independent_59_SANJARI_BALOD_2": "Independent_59_SANJARI_BALOD_2", "CMM": "CMM", "Independent_60_DONDI_LAHARA_1": "Independent_60_DONDI_LAHARA_1", "Independent_60_DONDI_LAHARA_2": "Independent_60_DONDI_LAHARA_2", "Independent_60_DONDI_LAHARA_3": "Independent_60_DONDI_LAHARA_3", "Independent_60_DONDI_LAHARA_4": "Independent_60_DONDI_LAHARA_4", "Independent_61_GUNDERDEHI_1": "Independent_61_GUNDERDEHI_1", "Independent_61_GUNDERDEHI_2": "Independent_61_GUNDERDEHI_2", "Independent_61_GUNDERDEHI_3": "Independent_61_GUNDERDEHI_3", "Independent_61_GUNDERDEHI_4": "Independent_61_GUNDERDEHI_4", "Independent_62_PATAN_1": "Independent_62_PATAN_1", "Independent_62_PATAN_2": "Independent_62_PATAN_2", "Independent_62_PATAN_3": "Independent_62_PATAN_3", "Independent_62_PATAN_4": "Independent_62_PATAN_4", "Independent_62_PATAN_5": "Independent_62_PATAN_5", "Independent_63_DURG_GRAMIN_1": "Independent_63_DURG_GRAMIN_1", "Independent_63_DURG_GRAMIN_2": "Independent_63_DURG_GRAMIN_2", "Independent_63_DURG_GRAMIN_3": "Independent_63_DURG_GRAMIN_3", "Independent_64_DURG_CITY_1": "Independent_64_DURG_CITY_1", "Independent_64_DURG_CITY_2": "Independent_64_DURG_CITY_2", "Independent_64_DURG_CITY_3": "Independent_64_DURG_CITY_3", "AJP": "AJP", "Independent_64_DURG_CITY_4": "Independent_64_DURG_CITY_4", "Independent_64_DURG_CITY_5": "Independent_64_DURG_CITY_5", "Independent_64_DURG_CITY_6": "Independent_64_DURG_CITY_6", "Independent_64_DURG_CITY_7": "Independent_64_DURG_CITY_7", "Independent_64_DURG_CITY_8": "Independent_64_DURG_CITY_8", "Independent_64_DURG_CITY_9": "Independent_64_DURG_CITY_9", "Independent_65_BHILAI_NAGAR_1": "Independent_65_BHILAI_NAGAR_1", "Independent_65_BHILAI_NAGAR_2": "Independent_65_BHILAI_NAGAR_2", "Independent_65_BHILAI_NAGAR_3": "Independent_65_BHILAI_NAGAR_3", "Independent_65_BHILAI_NAGAR_4": "Independent_65_BHILAI_NAGAR_4", "Independent_65_BHILAI_NAGAR_5": "Independent_65_BHILAI_NAGAR_5", "Independent_65_BHILAI_NAGAR_6": "Independent_65_BHILAI_NAGAR_6", "Independent_65_BHILAI_NAGAR_7": "Independent_65_BHILAI_NAGAR_7", "Independent_65_BHILAI_NAGAR_8": "Independent_65_BHILAI_NAGAR_8", "Independent_65_BHILAI_NAGAR_9": "Independent_65_BHILAI_NAGAR_9", "Independent_66_VAISHALI_NAGAR_1": "Independent_66_VAISHALI_NAGAR_1", "Independent_66_VAISHALI_NAGAR_2": "Independent_66_VAISHALI_NAGAR_2", "Independent_66_VAISHALI_NAGAR_3": "Independent_66_VAISHALI_NAGAR_3", "Independent_66_VAISHALI_NAGAR_4": "Independent_66_VAISHALI_NAGAR_4", "Independent_66_VAISHALI_NAGAR_5": "Independent_66_VAISHALI_NAGAR_5", "Independent_66_VAISHALI_NAGAR_6": "Independent_66_VAISHALI_NAGAR_6", "Independent_66_VAISHALI_NAGAR_7": "Independent_66_VAISHALI_NAGAR_7", "Independent_66_VAISHALI_NAGAR_8": "Independent_66_VAISHALI_NAGAR_8", "BHMM": "BHMM", "Independent_67_AHIWARA_1": "Independent_67_AHIWARA_1", "Independent_67_AHIWARA_2": "Independent_67_AHIWARA_2", "Independent_68_SAJA_1": "Independent_68_SAJA_1", "Independent_68_SAJA_2": "Independent_68_SAJA_2", "Independent_68_SAJA_3": "Independent_68_SAJA_3", "Independent_69_BEMETARA_1": "Independent_69_BEMETARA_1", "Independent_69_BEMETARA_2": "Independent_69_BEMETARA_2", "Independent_69_BEMETARA_3": "Independent_69_BEMETARA_3", "Independent_69_BEMETARA_4": "Independent_69_BEMETARA_4", "Independent_69_BEMETARA_5": "Independent_69_BEMETARA_5", "Independent_70_NAVAGARH_1": "Independent_70_NAVAGARH_1", "Independent_70_NAVAGARH_2": "Independent_70_NAVAGARH_2", "Independent_70_NAVAGARH_3": "Independent_70_NAVAGARH_3", "Independent_71_PANDARIYA_1": "Independent_71_PANDARIYA_1", "Independent_71_PANDARIYA_2": "Independent_71_PANDARIYA_2", "Independent_71_PANDARIYA_3": "Independent_71_PANDARIYA_3", "Independent_71_PANDARIYA_4": "Independent_71_PANDARIYA_4", "Independent_71_PANDARIYA_5": "Independent_71_PANDARIYA_5", "Independent_71_PANDARIYA_6": "Independent_71_PANDARIYA_6", "Independent_72_KAWARDHA_1": "Independent_72_KAWARDHA_1", "Independent_72_KAWARDHA_2": "Independent_72_KAWARDHA_2", "Independent_72_KAWARDHA_3": "Independent_72_KAWARDHA_3", "Independent_73_KHAIRAGARH_1": "Independent_73_KHAIRAGARH_1", "Independent_74_DONGARGARH_1": "Independent_74_DONGARGARH_1", "Independent_74_DONGARGARH_2": "Independent_74_DONGARGARH_2", "Independent_74_DONGARGARH_3": "Independent_74_DONGARGARH_3", "Independent_75_RAJNANDGAON_1": "Independent_75_RAJNANDGAON_1", "Independent_75_RAJNANDGAON_2": "Independent_75_RAJNANDGAON_2", "Independent_75_RAJNANDGAON_3": "Independent_75_RAJNANDGAON_3", "Independent_75_RAJNANDGAON_4": "Independent_75_RAJNANDGAON_4", "Independent_75_RAJNANDGAON_5": "Independent_75_RAJNANDGAON_5", "Independent_75_RAJNANDGAON_6": "Independent_75_RAJNANDGAON_6", "Independent_75_RAJNANDGAON_7": "Independent_75_RAJNANDGAON_7", "Independent_76_DONGARGAON_1": "Independent_76_DONGARGAON_1", "Independent_77_KHUJJI_1": "Independent_77_KHUJJI_1", "Independent_77_KHUJJI_2": "Independent_77_KHUJJI_2", "Independent_77_KHUJJI_3": "Independent_77_KHUJJI_3", "Independent_78_MOHALA_MANPUR_1": "Independent_78_MOHALA_MANPUR_1", "Independent_78_MOHALA_MANPUR_2": "Independent_78_MOHALA_MANPUR_2", "Independent_78_MOHALA_MANPUR_3": "Independent_78_MOHALA_MANPUR_3", "Independent_80_BHANUPRATAPPUR_1": "Independent_80_BHANUPRATAPPUR_1", "Independent_81_KANKER_1": "Independent_81_KANKER_1", "Independent_81_KANKER_2": "Independent_81_KANKER_2", "Independent_82_KESHKAL_1": "Independent_82_KESHKAL_1", "Independent_82_KESHKAL_2": "Independent_82_KESHKAL_2", "Independent_82_KESHKAL_3": "Independent_82_KESHKAL_3", "Independent_83_KONDAGAON_1": "Independent_83_KONDAGAON_1", "Independent_83_KONDAGAON_2": "Independent_83_KONDAGAON_2", "Independent_84_NARAINPUR_1": "Independent_84_NARAINPUR_1", "Independent_84_NARAINPUR_2": "Independent_84_NARAINPUR_2", "Independent_85_BASTAR_1": "Independent_85_BASTAR_1", "Independent_86_JAGDALPUR_1": "Independent_86_JAGDALPUR_1", "Independent_86_JAGDALPUR_2": "Independent_86_JAGDALPUR_2", "Independent_86_JAGDALPUR_3": "Independent_86_JAGDALPUR_3", "Independent_86_JAGDALPUR_4": "Independent_86_JAGDALPUR_4", "Independent_86_JAGDALPUR_5": "Independent_86_JAGDALPUR_5", "Independent_87_CHITRAKOT_1": "Independent_87_CHITRAKOT_1", "Independent_88_DANTEWARA_1": "Independent_88_DANTEWARA_1", "Independent_89_BIJAPUR_1": "Independent_89_BIJAPUR_1", "Independent_89_BIJAPUR_2": "Independent_89_BIJAPUR_2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 90, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 90, "cast_gt_registered": 90}, "n_stations_flagged": 90, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:51:41.971251", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.646, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.666, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.65, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.522, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.275, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.65, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.522, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.522, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.407, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.407, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.582, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 90}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ffef5ad6f87a497face40348d3d2cf17", "name": "India 2014 local (overnight india-jammu-kashmir-2014-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2014, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"JKPDP": "JKPDP", "JKN": "JKN", "INC": "INC", "JPC": "JPC", "BJP": "BJP", "JKNPP": "JKNPP", "AJKMP": "AJKMP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "IND_002_1": "IND_002_1", "IND_002_2": "IND_002_2", "IND_002_3": "IND_002_3", "BSP": "BSP", "NCP": "NCP", "RPI": "RPI", "IND_004_1": "IND_004_1", "IND_004_2": "IND_004_2", "IND_004_3": "IND_004_3", "IND_004_4": "IND_004_4", "IND_004_5": "IND_004_5", "IND_005_1": "IND_005_1", "IND_005_2": "IND_005_2", "IND_005_3": "IND_005_3", "IND_005_4": "IND_005_4", "IND_005_5": "IND_005_5", "IND_007_1": "IND_007_1", "IND_007_2": "IND_007_2", "IND_007_3": "IND_007_3", "IND_007_4": "IND_007_4", "IND_007_5": "IND_007_5", "IND_007_6": "IND_007_6", "IND_008_1": "IND_008_1", "IND_008_2": "IND_008_2", "IND_008_3": "IND_008_3", "IND_008_4": "IND_008_4", "IND_008_5": "IND_008_5", "IND_008_6": "IND_008_6", "IND_008_7": "IND_008_7", "IND_008_8": "IND_008_8", "IND_008_9": "IND_008_9", "IND_008_10": "IND_008_10", "IND_009_1": "IND_009_1", "IND_010_1": "IND_010_1", "IND_010_2": "IND_010_2", "IND_010_3": "IND_010_3", "IND_010_4": "IND_010_4", "IND_010_5": "IND_010_5", "AIFB": "AIFB", "IND_011_1": "IND_011_1", "IND_011_2": "IND_011_2", "IND_012_1": "IND_012_1", "IND_012_2": "IND_012_2", "IND_012_3": "IND_012_3", "IND_012_4": "IND_012_4", "IND_013_1": "IND_013_1", "IND_013_2": "IND_013_2", "IND_013_3": "IND_013_3", "IND_013_4": "IND_013_4", "IND_013_5": "IND_013_5", "JKDPN": "JKDPN", "IND_014_1": "IND_014_1", "IND_014_2": "IND_014_2", "IND_014_3": "IND_014_3", "IND_015_1": "IND_015_1", "IND_015_2": "IND_015_2", "IND_015_3": "IND_015_3", "IND_015_4": "IND_015_4", "IND_015_5": "IND_015_5", "IND_015_6": "IND_015_6", "IND_016_1": "IND_016_1", "IND_016_2": "IND_016_2", "IND_017_1": "IND_017_1", "IND_017_2": "IND_017_2", "IND_017_3": "IND_017_3", "IND_017_4": "IND_017_4", "IND_017_5": "IND_017_5", "IND_017_6": "IND_017_6", "IND_017_7": "IND_017_7", "IND_018_1": "IND_018_1", "IND_018_2": "IND_018_2", "RAJPA": "RAJPA", "IND_018_3": "IND_018_3", "ABHM": "ABHM", "IND_018_4": "IND_018_4", "IND_019_1": "IND_019_1", "IND_019_2": "IND_019_2", "IND_019_3": "IND_019_3", "IND_019_4": "IND_019_4", "IND_019_5": "IND_019_5", "IND_019_6": "IND_019_6", "IND_019_7": "IND_019_7", "IND_020_1": "IND_020_1", "IND_020_2": "IND_020_2", "IND_020_3": "IND_020_3", "IND_021_1": "IND_021_1", "IND_021_2": "IND_021_2", "LJP": "LJP", "IND_022_1": "IND_022_1", "IND_022_2": "IND_022_2", "IND_022_3": "IND_022_3", "IND_022_4": "IND_022_4", "IND_022_5": "IND_022_5", "IND_023_1": "IND_023_1", "IND_023_2": "IND_023_2", "IND_023_3": "IND_023_3", "IND_023_4": "IND_023_4", "IND_023_5": "IND_023_5", "IND_023_6": "IND_023_6", "IND_023_7": "IND_023_7", "IND_023_8": "IND_023_8", "IND_024_1": "IND_024_1", "IND_024_2": "IND_024_2", "IND_024_3": "IND_024_3", "IND_024_4": "IND_024_4", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "IND_025_1": "IND_025_1", "IND_025_2": "IND_025_2", "SP": "SP", "IND_025_3": "IND_025_3", "JKPPS": "JKPPS", "IND_025_4": "IND_025_4", "IND_025_5": "IND_025_5", "IND_026_1": "IND_026_1", "IND_026_2": "IND_026_2", "JKPDF": "JKPDF", "IND_027_1": "IND_027_1", "IND_028_1": "IND_028_1", "IND_029_1": "IND_029_1", "IND_029_2": "IND_029_2", "IND_030_1": "IND_030_1", "IND_030_2": "IND_030_2", "IND_031_1": "IND_031_1", "IND_031_2": "IND_031_2", "IND_032_1": "IND_032_1", "IND_032_2": "IND_032_2", "IND_033_1": "IND_033_1", "IND_033_2": "IND_033_2", "IND_033_3": "IND_033_3", "IND_033_4": "IND_033_4", "IND_034_1": "IND_034_1", "IND_034_2": "IND_034_2", "IND_034_3": "IND_034_3", "IND_034_4": "IND_034_4", "CPM": "CPM", "IND_035_1": "IND_035_1", "IND_035_2": "IND_035_2", "AKAKRP": "AKAKRP", "IND_036_1": "IND_036_1", "IND_036_2": "IND_036_2", "CPI": "CPI", "IND_036_3": "IND_036_3", "IND_037_1": "IND_037_1", "IND_037_2": "IND_037_2", "IND_037_3": "IND_037_3", "IND_037_4": "IND_037_4", "IND_037_5": "IND_037_5", "IND_037_6": "IND_037_6", "IND_037_7": "IND_037_7", "IND_037_8": "IND_037_8", "IND_037_9": "IND_037_9", "IND_038_1": "IND_038_1", "IND_038_2": "IND_038_2", "IND_039_1": "IND_039_1", "IND_040_1": "IND_040_1", "IND_040_2": "IND_040_2", "IND_041_1": "IND_041_1", "IND_041_2": "IND_041_2", "IND_042_1": "IND_042_1", "IND_042_2": "IND_042_2", "HJP": "HJP", "IPCP": "IPCP", "IND_043_1": "IND_043_1", "IND_044_1": "IND_044_1", "IND_044_2": "IND_044_2", "IND_044_3": "IND_044_3", "IND_046_1": "IND_046_1", "IND_047_1": "IND_047_1", "IND_047_2": "IND_047_2", "IND_050_1": "IND_050_1", "IND_051_1": "IND_051_1", "IND_051_2": "IND_051_2", "IND_051_3": "IND_051_3", "JD(S)": "JD(S)", "RKSP": "RKSP", "IND_052_1": "IND_052_1", "IND_052_2": "IND_052_2", "IND_052_3": "IND_052_3", "IND_052_4": "IND_052_4", "IND_052_5": "IND_052_5", "IND_053_1": "IND_053_1", "IND_053_2": "IND_053_2", "IND_053_3": "IND_053_3", "IND_053_4": "IND_053_4", "IND_053_5": "IND_053_5", "IND_053_6": "IND_053_6", "IND_054_1": "IND_054_1", "IND_054_2": "IND_054_2", "IND_054_3": "IND_054_3", "IND_054_4": "IND_054_4", "IND_055_1": "IND_055_1", "IND_058_1": "IND_058_1", "IND_058_2": "IND_058_2", "IND_058_3": "IND_058_3", "IND_058_4": "IND_058_4", "IND_058_5": "IND_058_5", "IND_058_6": "IND_058_6", "IND_058_7": "IND_058_7", "IND_058_8": "IND_058_8", "IND_059_1": "IND_059_1", "IND_059_2": "IND_059_2", "IND_059_3": "IND_059_3", "IND_059_4": "IND_059_4", "IND_060_1": "IND_060_1", "IND_060_2": "IND_060_2", "IND_060_3": "IND_060_3", "IND_062_1": "IND_062_1", "IND_063_1": "IND_063_1", "IND_063_2": "IND_063_2", "IND_063_3": "IND_063_3", "IND_063_4": "IND_063_4", "IND_063_5": "IND_063_5", "IND_064_1": "IND_064_1", "IND_064_2": "IND_064_2", "IND_064_3": "IND_064_3", "IND_064_4": "IND_064_4", "IND_064_5": "IND_064_5", "IND_064_6": "IND_064_6", "IND_065_1": "IND_065_1", "IND_065_2": "IND_065_2", "IND_065_3": "IND_065_3", "IND_065_4": "IND_065_4", "BMUP": "BMUP", "IND_065_5": "IND_065_5", "IND_065_6": "IND_065_6", "IND_066_1": "IND_066_1", "IND_066_2": "IND_066_2", "IND_067_1": "IND_067_1", "IND_067_2": "IND_067_2", "IND_069_1": "IND_069_1", "IND_069_2": "IND_069_2", "IND_069_3": "IND_069_3", "IND_069_4": "IND_069_4", "IND_069_5": "IND_069_5", "IND_069_6": "IND_069_6", "IND_070_1": "IND_070_1", "IND_070_2": "IND_070_2", "JSM(P)": "JSM(P)", "IND_071_1": "IND_071_1", "IND_071_2": "IND_071_2", "IND_071_3": "IND_071_3", "BHBP": "BHBP", "IND_072_1": "IND_072_1", "IND_072_2": "IND_072_2", "IND_072_3": "IND_072_3", "IND_072_4": "IND_072_4", "IND_073_1": "IND_073_1", "IND_073_2": "IND_073_2", "IND_073_3": "IND_073_3", "IND_073_4": "IND_073_4", "IND_073_5": "IND_073_5", "IND_073_6": "IND_073_6", "DGPP": "DGPP", "IND_074_1": "IND_074_1", "IND_075_1": "IND_075_1", "IND_075_2": "IND_075_2", "IND_075_3": "IND_075_3", "IND_075_4": "IND_075_4", "IND_076_1": "IND_076_1", "IND_076_2": "IND_076_2", "IND_076_3": "IND_076_3", "IND_076_4": "IND_076_4", "IND_077_1": "IND_077_1", "IND_078_1": "IND_078_1", "AAAP": "AAAP", "IND_078_2": "IND_078_2", "IND_078_3": "IND_078_3", "IND_079_1": "IND_079_1", "IND_079_2": "IND_079_2", "IND_080_1": "IND_080_1", "IND_080_2": "IND_080_2", "IND_081_1": "IND_081_1", "IND_081_2": "IND_081_2", "IND_081_3": "IND_081_3", "IND_081_4": "IND_081_4", "IND_082_1": "IND_082_1", "IND_082_2": "IND_082_2", "HKRD": "HKRD", "IND_082_3": "IND_082_3", "IND_082_4": "IND_082_4", "IND_083_1": "IND_083_1", "IND_083_2": "IND_083_2", "IND_083_3": "IND_083_3", "IND_083_4": "IND_083_4", "IND_083_5": "IND_083_5", "IND_083_6": "IND_083_6", "IND_083_7": "IND_083_7", "IND_084_1": "IND_084_1", "IND_084_2": "IND_084_2", "IND_085_1": "IND_085_1", "IND_085_2": "IND_085_2", "IND_085_3": "IND_085_3", "IND_086_1": "IND_086_1", "IND_086_2": "IND_086_2", "IND_086_3": "IND_086_3", "JKPPAP": "JKPPAP", "IND_086_4": "IND_086_4", "IND_087_1": "IND_087_1", "IND_087_2": "IND_087_2", "IND_087_3": "IND_087_3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 87, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 87, "cast_gt_registered": 87}, "n_stations_flagged": 87, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:51:37.758284", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.604, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.56, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.617, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.488, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.069, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.658, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.275, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.617, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.617, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.488, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.818, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.576, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.576, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 87}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e75b1e7f8e1943c686d3cc3ee0cd0302", "name": "India 2014 local (overnight india-jharkhand-2014-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2014, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Jharkhand/Jharkhand_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AAMP": "AAMP", "ABHM": "ABHM", "ABJS": "ABJS", "AHNP": "AHNP", "AIFB": "AIFB", "AITC": "AITC", "AJSUP": "AJSUP", "AKBJHP": "AKBJHP", "AMB": "AMB", "APOI": "APOI", "AWVP": "AWVP", "BASAPA": "BASAPA", "BJP": "BJP", "BMUP": "BMUP", "BSP": "BSP", "BSSPA": "BSSPA", "BSUD": "BSUD", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI( (LML)": "CPI( (LML)", "CPI( ML (L)": "CPI( ML (L)", "CPI(M (L)L)": "CPI(M (L)L)", "CPI(ML (L))": "CPI(ML (L))", "CPIM": "CPIM", "CPM": "CPM", "DESP": "DESP", "GAAP": "GAAP", "GGP": "GGP", "HJP": "HJP", "HKIP": "HKIP", "INC": "INC", "IUML": "IUML", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "Independent_10_3": "Independent_10_3", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "Independent_11_3": "Independent_11_3", "Independent_11_4": "Independent_11_4", "Independent_11_5": "Independent_11_5", "Independent_11_6": "Independent_11_6", "Independent_11_7": "Independent_11_7", "Independent_11_8": "Independent_11_8", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "Independent_12_3": "Independent_12_3", "Independent_12_4": "Independent_12_4", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "Independent_13_3": "Independent_13_3", "Independent_13_4": "Independent_13_4", "Independent_13_5": "Independent_13_5", "Independent_13_6": "Independent_13_6", "Independent_13_7": "Independent_13_7", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "Independent_14_3": "Independent_14_3", "Independent_14_4": "Independent_14_4", "Independent_14_5": "Independent_14_5", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_15_2": "Independent_15_2", "Independent_15_3": "Independent_15_3", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_16_2": "Independent_16_2", "Independent_16_3": "Independent_16_3", "Independent_16_4": "Independent_16_4", "Independent_16_5": "Independent_16_5", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "Independent_17_3": "Independent_17_3", "Independent_17_4": "Independent_17_4", "Independent_17_5": "Independent_17_5", "Independent_17_6": "Independent_17_6", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_18_3": "Independent_18_3", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "Independent_19_3": "Independent_19_3", "Independent_19_4": "Independent_19_4", "Independent_19_5": "Independent_19_5", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_20_2": "Independent_20_2", "Independent_20_3": "Independent_20_3", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_21_2": "Independent_21_2", "Independent_21_3": "Independent_21_3", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_22_2": "Independent_22_2", "Independent_22_3": "Independent_22_3", "Independent_22_4": "Independent_22_4", "Independent_22_5": "Independent_22_5", "Independent_22_6": "Independent_22_6", "Independent_22_7": "Independent_22_7", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_23_2": "Independent_23_2", "Independent_23_3": "Independent_23_3", "Independent_23_4": "Independent_23_4", "Independent_23_5": "Independent_23_5", "Independent_23_6": "Independent_23_6", "Independent_23_7": "Independent_23_7", "Independent_23_8": "Independent_23_8", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "Independent_24_2": "Independent_24_2", "Independent_24_3": "Independent_24_3", "Independent_24_4": "Independent_24_4", "Independent_24_5": "Independent_24_5", "Independent_24_6": "Independent_24_6", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "Independent_25_4": "Independent_25_4", "Independent_25_5": "Independent_25_5", "Independent_25_6": "Independent_25_6", "Independent_25_7": "Independent_25_7", "Independent_25_8": "Independent_25_8", "Independent_25_9": "Independent_25_9", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "Independent_26_3": "Independent_26_3", "Independent_26_4": "Independent_26_4", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "Independent_28_4": "Independent_28_4", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "Independent_29_4": "Independent_29_4", "Independent_29_5": "Independent_29_5", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_31_2": "Independent_31_2", "Independent_31_3": "Independent_31_3", "Independent_31_4": "Independent_31_4", "Independent_31_5": "Independent_31_5", "Independent_31_6": "Independent_31_6", "Independent_31_7": "Independent_31_7", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "Independent_33_4": "Independent_33_4", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_34_3": "Independent_34_3", "Independent_34_4": "Independent_34_4", "Independent_34_5": "Independent_34_5", "Independent_34_6": "Independent_34_6", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "Independent_35_2": "Independent_35_2", "Independent_35_3": "Independent_35_3", "Independent_35_4": "Independent_35_4", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_10": "Independent_36_10", "Independent_36_11": "Independent_36_11", "Independent_36_12": "Independent_36_12", "Independent_36_13": "Independent_36_13", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_36_3": "Independent_36_3", "Independent_36_4": "Independent_36_4", "Independent_36_5": "Independent_36_5", "Independent_36_6": "Independent_36_6", "Independent_36_7": "Independent_36_7", "Independent_36_8": "Independent_36_8", "Independent_36_9": "Independent_36_9", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_38_3": "Independent_38_3", "Independent_38_4": "Independent_38_4", "Independent_38_5": "Independent_38_5", "Independent_38_6": "Independent_38_6", "Independent_38_7": "Independent_38_7", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_39_2": "Independent_39_2", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "Independent_3_3": "Independent_3_3", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_40_3": "Independent_40_3", "Independent_40_4": "Independent_40_4", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "Independent_41_3": "Independent_41_3", "Independent_41_4": "Independent_41_4", "Independent_41_5": "Independent_41_5", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_42_2": "Independent_42_2", "Independent_42_3": "Independent_42_3", "Independent_42_4": "Independent_42_4", "Independent_42_5": "Independent_42_5", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_45_2": "Independent_45_2", "Independent_45_3": "Independent_45_3", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "Independent_46_3": "Independent_46_3", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_48_2": "Independent_48_2", "Independent_48_3": "Independent_48_3", "Independent_48_4": "Independent_48_4", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_10": "Independent_50_10", "Independent_50_11": "Independent_50_11", "Independent_50_12": "Independent_50_12", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_50_3": "Independent_50_3", "Independent_50_4": "Independent_50_4", "Independent_50_5": "Independent_50_5", "Independent_50_6": "Independent_50_6", "Independent_50_7": "Independent_50_7", "Independent_50_8": "Independent_50_8", "Independent_50_9": "Independent_50_9", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_51_3": "Independent_51_3", "Independent_51_4": "Independent_51_4", "Independent_51_5": "Independent_51_5", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "Independent_52_3": "Independent_52_3", "Independent_52_4": "Independent_52_4", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_55_2": "Independent_55_2", "Independent_55_3": "Independent_55_3", "Independent_55_4": "Independent_55_4", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_56_2": "Independent_56_2", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_58_1": "Independent_58_1", "Independent_58_2": "Independent_58_2", "Independent_58_3": "Independent_58_3", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "Independent_5_2": "Independent_5_2", "Independent_5_3": "Independent_5_3", "Independent_5_4": "Independent_5_4", "Independent_5_5": "Independent_5_5", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_62_3": "Independent_62_3", "Independent_62_4": "Independent_62_4", "Independent_62_5": "Independent_62_5", "Independent_62_6": "Independent_62_6", "Independent_62_7": "Independent_62_7", "Independent_62_8": "Independent_62_8", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "Independent_63_3": "Independent_63_3", "Independent_63_4": "Independent_63_4", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_64_10": "Independent_64_10", "Independent_64_11": "Independent_64_11", "Independent_64_12": "Independent_64_12", "Independent_64_13": "Independent_64_13", "Independent_64_2": "Independent_64_2", "Independent_64_3": "Independent_64_3", "Independent_64_4": "Independent_64_4", "Independent_64_5": "Independent_64_5", "Independent_64_6": "Independent_64_6", "Independent_64_7": "Independent_64_7", "Independent_64_8": "Independent_64_8", "Independent_64_9": "Independent_64_9", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_65_2": "Independent_65_2", "Independent_65_3": "Independent_65_3", "Independent_65_4": "Independent_65_4", "Independent_65_5": "Independent_65_5", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_66_2": "Independent_66_2", "Independent_66_3": "Independent_66_3", "Independent_66_4": "Independent_66_4", "Independent_66_5": "Independent_66_5", "Independent_66_6": "Independent_66_6", "Independent_66_7": "Independent_66_7", "Independent_67_1": "Independent_67_1", "Independent_67_2": "Independent_67_2", "Independent_67_3": "Independent_67_3", "Independent_67_4": "Independent_67_4", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "Independent_68_3": "Independent_68_3", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_69_3": "Independent_69_3", "Independent_69_4": "Independent_69_4", "Independent_69_5": "Independent_69_5", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "Independent_6_2": "Independent_6_2", "Independent_6_3": "Independent_6_3", "Independent_6_4": "Independent_6_4", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "Independent_70_2": "Independent_70_2", "Independent_70_3": "Independent_70_3", "Independent_70_4": "Independent_70_4", "Independent_71_1": "Independent_71_1", "Independent_71_2": "Independent_71_2", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_72_2": "Independent_72_2", "Independent_72_3": "Independent_72_3", "Independent_72_4": "Independent_72_4", "Independent_72_5": "Independent_72_5", "Independent_72_6": "Independent_72_6", "Independent_72_7": "Independent_72_7", "Independent_72_8": "Independent_72_8", "Independent_72_9": "Independent_72_9", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "Independent_73_3": "Independent_73_3", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_75_2": "Independent_75_2", "Independent_75_3": "Independent_75_3", "Independent_75_4": "Independent_75_4", "Independent_75_5": "Independent_75_5", "Independent_75_6": "Independent_75_6", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_10": "Independent_76_10", "Independent_76_11": "Independent_76_11", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_76_3": "Independent_76_3", "Independent_76_4": "Independent_76_4", "Independent_76_5": "Independent_76_5", "Independent_76_6": "Independent_76_6", "Independent_76_7": "Independent_76_7", "Independent_76_8": "Independent_76_8", "Independent_76_9": "Independent_76_9", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_77_2": "Independent_77_2", "Independent_77_3": "Independent_77_3", "Independent_77_4": "Independent_77_4", "Independent_77_5": "Independent_77_5", "Independent_77_6": "Independent_77_6", "Independent_77_7": "Independent_77_7", "Independent_77_8": "Independent_77_8", "Independent_77_9": "Independent_77_9", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_78_2": "Independent_78_2", "Independent_78_3": "Independent_78_3", "Independent_79_1": "Independent_79_1", "Independent_79_2": "Independent_79_2", "Independent_79_3": "Independent_79_3", "Independent_79_4": "Independent_79_4", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "Independent_7_2": "Independent_7_2", "Independent_7_3": "Independent_7_3", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_80_10": "Independent_80_10", "Independent_80_2": "Independent_80_2", "Independent_80_3": "Independent_80_3", "Independent_80_4": "Independent_80_4", "Independent_80_5": "Independent_80_5", "Independent_80_6": "Independent_80_6", "Independent_80_7": "Independent_80_7", "Independent_80_8": "Independent_80_8", "Independent_80_9": "Independent_80_9", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "Independent_81_2": "Independent_81_2", "Independent_81_3": "Independent_81_3", "Independent_81_4": "Independent_81_4", "Independent_81_5": "Independent_81_5", "Independent_81_6": "Independent_81_6", "Independent_81_7": "Independent_81_7", "Independent_81_8": "Independent_81_8", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "Independent_8_3": "Independent_8_3", "Independent_8_4": "Independent_8_4", "Independent_8_5": "Independent_8_5", "Independent_8_6": "Independent_8_6", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "Independent_9_2": "Independent_9_2", "Independent_9_3": "Independent_9_3", "Independent_9_4": "Independent_9_4", "JBSP": "JBSP", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "JDR": "JDR", "JJKM": "JJKM", "JKKP": "JKKP", "JKP": "JKP", "JKP(N)": "JKP(N)", "JKPP": "JKPP", "JMM": "JMM", "JPS": "JPS", "JVD": "JVD", "JVM": "JVM", "LJP": "LJP", "LJVM": "LJVM", "MCO": "MCO", "MMM": "MMM", "NCP": "NCP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "NSAM": "NSAM", "NYP": "NYP", "PMS": "PMS", "RADP": "RADP", "RAJPA": "RAJPA", "RAJSP": "RAJSP", "RGD": "RGD", "RJD": "RJD", "RKSP": "RKSP", "RMKPP": "RMKPP", "RPI": "RPI", "RSP": "RSP", "SAP": "SAP", "SHS": "SHS", "SP": "SP", "SP(I)": "SP(I)", "SSD": "SSD", "SUCI": "SUCI", "SVKP": "SVKP", "SWRP": "SWRP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 81, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 81, "cast_gt_registered": 81}, "n_stations_flagged": 81, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:51:35.190349", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.604, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.56, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.617, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.488, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.069, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.658, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.275, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.617, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.617, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.488, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.818, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.576, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.576, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 81}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bc0a780ebaba48999902b8fdd9f3de1b", "name": "India 2013 local (overnight india-delhi-2013-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2013, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Delhi/Delhi_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AA S P": "AA S P", "AAAP": "AAAP", "AACP": "AACP", "ABHM": "ABHM", "ABSPAR": "ABSPAR", "ABVCP Tel": "ABVCP Tel", "AIBS": "AIBS", "AICP": "AICP", "AIFB": "AIFB", "ANC": "ANC", "AP": "AP", "ATBP": "ATBP", "AVIRP": "AVIRP", "BASMM": "BASMM", "BASPB": "BASPB", "BHBP": "BHBP", "BJDI": "BJDI", "BJP": "BJP", "BNIP": "BNIP", "BPC": "BPC", "BSKP": "BSKP", "BSKRP": "BSKRP", "BSP": "BSP", "BSVPT": "BSVPT", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "CPM": "CPM", "DJP": "DJP", "DMDK": "DMDK", "HJP": "HJP", "HND": "HND", "IBSP": "IBSP", "IDP": "IDP", "IJP": "IJP", "INC": "INC", "INLD": "INLD", "IPP": "IPP", "IUML": "IUML", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "Independent_11_3": "Independent_11_3", "Independent_11_4": "Independent_11_4", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_15_2": "Independent_15_2", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_16_2": "Independent_16_2", "Independent_16_3": "Independent_16_3", "Independent_16_4": "Independent_16_4", "Independent_16_5": "Independent_16_5", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "Independent_17_3": "Independent_17_3", "Independent_17_4": "Independent_17_4", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_18_3": "Independent_18_3", "Independent_18_4": "Independent_18_4", "Independent_18_5": "Independent_18_5", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "Independent_19_3": "Independent_19_3", "Independent_19_4": "Independent_19_4", "Independent_19_5": "Independent_19_5", "Independent_19_6": "Independent_19_6", "Independent_19_7": "Independent_19_7", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_20_2": "Independent_20_2", "Independent_20_3": "Independent_20_3", "Independent_20_4": "Independent_20_4", "Independent_20_5": "Independent_20_5", "Independent_20_6": "Independent_20_6", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_21_2": "Independent_21_2", "Independent_21_3": "Independent_21_3", "Independent_21_4": "Independent_21_4", "Independent_21_5": "Independent_21_5", "Independent_21_6": "Independent_21_6", "Independent_21_7": "Independent_21_7", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_22_2": "Independent_22_2", "Independent_22_3": "Independent_22_3", "Independent_22_4": "Independent_22_4", "Independent_22_5": "Independent_22_5", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_23_2": "Independent_23_2", "Independent_23_3": "Independent_23_3", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "Independent_25_4": "Independent_25_4", "Independent_25_5": "Independent_25_5", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "Independent_27_3": "Independent_27_3", "Independent_27_4": "Independent_27_4", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "Independent_29_4": "Independent_29_4", "Independent_29_5": "Independent_29_5", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "Independent_2_3": "Independent_2_3", "Independent_2_4": "Independent_2_4", "Independent_2_5": "Independent_2_5", "Independent_2_6": "Independent_2_6", "Independent_2_7": "Independent_2_7", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "Independent_30_3": "Independent_30_3", "Independent_30_4": "Independent_30_4", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_31_2": "Independent_31_2", "Independent_31_3": "Independent_31_3", "Independent_31_4": "Independent_31_4", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_32_3": "Independent_32_3", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_34_3": "Independent_34_3", "Independent_34_4": "Independent_34_4", "Independent_34_5": "Independent_34_5", "Independent_34_6": "Independent_34_6", "Independent_34_7": "Independent_34_7", "Independent_34_8": "Independent_34_8", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "Independent_35_2": "Independent_35_2", "Independent_35_3": "Independent_35_3", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_38_3": "Independent_38_3", "Independent_38_4": "Independent_38_4", "Independent_38_5": "Independent_38_5", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_39_2": "Independent_39_2", "Independent_39_3": "Independent_39_3", "Independent_39_4": "Independent_39_4", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_40_3": "Independent_40_3", "Independent_40_4": "Independent_40_4", "Independent_40_5": "Independent_40_5", "Independent_40_6": "Independent_40_6", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "Independent_41_3": "Independent_41_3", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_42_2": "Independent_42_2", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_43_2": "Independent_43_2", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_45_2": "Independent_45_2", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_48_2": "Independent_48_2", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "Independent_49_3": "Independent_49_3", "Independent_49_4": "Independent_49_4", "Independent_49_5": "Independent_49_5", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_51_3": "Independent_51_3", "Independent_51_4": "Independent_51_4", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "Independent_52_3": "Independent_52_3", "Independent_52_4": "Independent_52_4", "Independent_52_5": "Independent_52_5", "Independent_52_6": "Independent_52_6", "Independent_52_7": "Independent_52_7", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "Independent_53_2": "Independent_53_2", "Independent_53_3": "Independent_53_3", "Independent_53_4": "Independent_53_4", "Independent_53_5": "Independent_53_5", "Independent_53_6": "Independent_53_6", "Independent_53_7": "Independent_53_7", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_54_3": "Independent_54_3", "Independent_54_4": "Independent_54_4", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_55_2": "Independent_55_2", "Independent_55_3": "Independent_55_3", "Independent_55_4": "Independent_55_4", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_57_2": "Independent_57_2", "Independent_58_1": "Independent_58_1", "Independent_58_2": "Independent_58_2", "Independent_58_3": "Independent_58_3", "Independent_58_4": "Independent_58_4", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_59_2": "Independent_59_2", "Independent_59_3": "Independent_59_3", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "Independent_5_2": "Independent_5_2", "Independent_5_3": "Independent_5_3", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "Independent_60_3": "Independent_60_3", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "Independent_61_3": "Independent_61_3", "Independent_61_4": "Independent_61_4", "Independent_61_5": "Independent_61_5", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_62_3": "Independent_62_3", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_64_2": "Independent_64_2", "Independent_64_3": "Independent_64_3", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_65_2": "Independent_65_2", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_67_1": "Independent_67_1", "Independent_67_2": "Independent_67_2", "Independent_67_3": "Independent_67_3", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "Independent_6_2": "Independent_6_2", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "Independent_70_2": "Independent_70_2", "Independent_70_3": "Independent_70_3", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "Independent_7_2": "Independent_7_2", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "Independent_8_3": "Independent_8_3", "Independent_8_4": "Independent_8_4", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "Independent_9_2": "Independent_9_2", "Independent_9_3": "Independent_9_3", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "JKNPP": "JKNPP", "JSHSP": "JSHSP", "JSMP": "JSMP", "KAJP": "KAJP", "LJP": "LJP", "LPSP": "LPSP", "LSWP": "LSWP", "NADP": "NADP", "NALP": "NALP", "NCP": "NCP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "NYP": "NYP", "PBI": "PBI", "PECP": "PECP", "PHRC": "PHRC", "PPGP": "PPGP", "RAJSP": "RAJSP", "RAM": "RAM", "RAMSP Gas": "RAMSP Gas", "RBHP": "RBHP", "RDPI": "RDPI", "RJ": "RJ", "RJAP": "RJAP", "RKSP": "RKSP", "RLD": "RLD", "RMEP": "RMEP", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "RPIE": "RPIE", "RUC": "RUC", "RVNP": "RVNP", "RVNP R": "RVNP R", "SAD": "SAD", "SDPI": "SDPI", "SHS": "SHS", "SOJP": "SOJP", "SP": "SP", "SP(I)": "SP(I)", "SSGP": "SSGP", "SUCI": "SUCI", "VSP": "VSP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 70, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 70, "registered_not_positive": 70}, "n_stations_flagged": 70, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:51:32.297230", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.646, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.666, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.65, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.522, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.275, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.65, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.522, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.522, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.407, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.407, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.582, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 70}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1f67cff3bc584a46928de5024348e051", "name": "India 2012 local (overnight india-uttarakhand-2012-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2012, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Uttarakhand/Uttarakhand_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"party_BJP": "party_BJP", "Independent_PUROLA_1": "Independent_PUROLA_1", "party_INC": "party_INC", "party_BSP": "party_BSP", "party_UTPP": "party_UTPP", "party_UKDP": "party_UKDP", "Independent_YAMUNOTRI_1": "Independent_YAMUNOTRI_1", "party_JD_U": "party_JD_U", "party_UTRM": "party_UTRM", "Independent_GANGOTRI_1": "Independent_GANGOTRI_1", "Independent_GANGOTRI_2": "Independent_GANGOTRI_2", "Independent_GANGOTRI_3": "Independent_GANGOTRI_3", "party_CPI": "party_CPI", "party_UPP": "party_UPP", "party_LJP": "party_LJP", "Independent_BADRINATH_1": "Independent_BADRINATH_1", "Independent_BADRINATH_2": "Independent_BADRINATH_2", "party_SP": "party_SP", "party_CPM": "party_CPM", "Independent_THARALI_1": "Independent_THARALI_1", "Independent_THARALI_2": "Independent_THARALI_2", "Independent_THARALI_3": "Independent_THARALI_3", "Independent_THARALI_4": "Independent_THARALI_4", "party_NCP": "party_NCP", "Independent_THARALI_5": "Independent_THARALI_5", "Independent_KARNPRAYAG_1": "Independent_KARNPRAYAG_1", "Independent_KARNPRAYAG_2": "Independent_KARNPRAYAG_2", "Independent_KARNPRAYAG_3": "Independent_KARNPRAYAG_3", "Independent_KARNPRAYAG_4": "Independent_KARNPRAYAG_4", "Independent_KARNPRAYAG_5": "Independent_KARNPRAYAG_5", "party_CPI_ML_L": "party_CPI_ML_L", "Independent_KEDARNATH_1": "Independent_KEDARNATH_1", "Independent_KEDARNATH_2": "Independent_KEDARNATH_2", "Independent_RUDRAPRAYAG_1": "Independent_RUDRAPRAYAG_1", "Independent_RUDRAPRAYAG_2": "Independent_RUDRAPRAYAG_2", "Independent_RUDRAPRAYAG_3": "Independent_RUDRAPRAYAG_3", "Independent_RUDRAPRAYAG_4": "Independent_RUDRAPRAYAG_4", "Independent_GHANSHALI_1": "Independent_GHANSHALI_1", "party_ABHM": "party_ABHM", "Independent_DEOPRAYAG_1": "Independent_DEOPRAYAG_1", "Independent_DEOPRAYAG_2": "Independent_DEOPRAYAG_2", "Independent_DEOPRAYAG_3": "Independent_DEOPRAYAG_3", "Independent_DEOPRAYAG_4": "Independent_DEOPRAYAG_4", "party_SHS": "party_SHS", "party_RLD": "party_RLD", "Independent_NARENDRANAGAR_1": "Independent_NARENDRANAGAR_1", "Independent_NARENDRANAGAR_2": "Independent_NARENDRANAGAR_2", "Independent_PRATAPNAGAR_1": "Independent_PRATAPNAGAR_1", "Independent_PRATAPNAGAR_2": "Independent_PRATAPNAGAR_2", "Independent_TEHRI_1": "Independent_TEHRI_1", "Independent_TEHRI_2": "Independent_TEHRI_2", "Independent_TEHRI_3": "Independent_TEHRI_3", "Independent_TEHRI_4": "Independent_TEHRI_4", "Independent_DHANOLTI_1": "Independent_DHANOLTI_1", "Independent_DHANOLTI_2": "Independent_DHANOLTI_2", "Independent_DHANOLTI_3": "Independent_DHANOLTI_3", "Independent_DHANOLTI_4": "Independent_DHANOLTI_4", "Independent_DHANOLTI_5": "Independent_DHANOLTI_5", "Independent_DHANOLTI_6": "Independent_DHANOLTI_6", "Independent_DHANOLTI_7": "Independent_DHANOLTI_7", "party_UJP": "party_UJP", "Independent_CHAKRATA_1": "Independent_CHAKRATA_1", "Independent_VIKASNAGAR_1": "Independent_VIKASNAGAR_1", "Independent_VIKASNAGAR_2": "Independent_VIKASNAGAR_2", "Independent_VIKASNAGAR_3": "Independent_VIKASNAGAR_3", "Independent_VIKASNAGAR_4": "Independent_VIKASNAGAR_4", "party_SASP": "party_SASP", "Independent_VIKASNAGAR_5": "Independent_VIKASNAGAR_5", "Independent_VIKASNAGAR_6": "Independent_VIKASNAGAR_6", "Independent_VIKASNAGAR_7": "Independent_VIKASNAGAR_7", "Independent_VIKASNAGAR_8": "Independent_VIKASNAGAR_8", "party_MKD": "party_MKD", "party_JD_S": "party_JD_S", "Independent_SAHASPUR_1": "Independent_SAHASPUR_1", "Independent_SAHASPUR_2": "Independent_SAHASPUR_2", "Independent_SAHASPUR_3": "Independent_SAHASPUR_3", "Independent_SAHASPUR_4": "Independent_SAHASPUR_4", "Independent_SAHASPUR_5": "Independent_SAHASPUR_5", "Independent_SAHASPUR_6": "Independent_SAHASPUR_6", "party_GDP": "party_GDP", "Independent_SAHASPUR_7": "Independent_SAHASPUR_7", "Independent_SAHASPUR_8": "Independent_SAHASPUR_8", "party_AITC": "party_AITC", "Independent_SAHASPUR_9": "Independent_SAHASPUR_9", "Independent_SAHASPUR_10": "Independent_SAHASPUR_10", "Independent_SAHASPUR_11": "Independent_SAHASPUR_11", "Independent_SAHASPUR_12": "Independent_SAHASPUR_12", "party_JLKP": "party_JLKP", "party_MUL": "party_MUL", "Independent_DHARAMPUR_1": "Independent_DHARAMPUR_1", "Independent_DHARAMPUR_2": "Independent_DHARAMPUR_2", "party_BSP_K": "party_BSP_K", "Independent_DHARAMPUR_3": "Independent_DHARAMPUR_3", "party_JMBP": "party_JMBP", "Independent_RAIPUR_1": "Independent_RAIPUR_1", "Independent_RAIPUR_2": "Independent_RAIPUR_2", "Independent_RAIPUR_3": "Independent_RAIPUR_3", "Independent_RAIPUR_4": "Independent_RAIPUR_4", "Independent_RAIPUR_5": "Independent_RAIPUR_5", "Independent_RAIPUR_6": "Independent_RAIPUR_6", "Independent_RAIPUR_7": "Independent_RAIPUR_7", "Independent_RAIPUR_8": "Independent_RAIPUR_8", "Independent_RAIPUR_9": "Independent_RAIPUR_9", "party_JKNPP": "party_JKNPP", "Independent_RAJPUR_ROAD_1": "Independent_RAJPUR_ROAD_1", "Independent_RAJPUR_ROAD_2": "Independent_RAJPUR_ROAD_2", "party_RJKP": "party_RJKP", "Independent_DEHRADUN_CANTT_1": "Independent_DEHRADUN_CANTT_1", "Independent_DEHRADUN_CANTT_2": "Independent_DEHRADUN_CANTT_2", "Independent_DEHRADUN_CANTT_3": "Independent_DEHRADUN_CANTT_3", "party_RJSD": "party_RJSD", "party_IJP": "party_IJP", "Independent_MUSSOORIE_1": "Independent_MUSSOORIE_1", "Independent_MUSSOORIE_2": "Independent_MUSSOORIE_2", "Independent_MUSSOORIE_3": "Independent_MUSSOORIE_3", "Independent_MUSSOORIE_4": "Independent_MUSSOORIE_4", "Independent_MUSSOORIE_5": "Independent_MUSSOORIE_5", "Independent_DOIWALA_1": "Independent_DOIWALA_1", "Independent_DOIWALA_2": "Independent_DOIWALA_2", "party_MOSP": "party_MOSP", "Independent_DOIWALA_3": "Independent_DOIWALA_3", "Independent_DOIWALA_4": "Independent_DOIWALA_4", "Independent_DOIWALA_5": "Independent_DOIWALA_5", "Independent_DOIWALA_6": "Independent_DOIWALA_6", "Independent_DOIWALA_7": "Independent_DOIWALA_7", "Independent_RISHIKESH_1": "Independent_RISHIKESH_1", "Independent_RISHIKESH_2": "Independent_RISHIKESH_2", "Independent_RISHIKESH_3": "Independent_RISHIKESH_3", "Independent_RISHIKESH_4": "Independent_RISHIKESH_4", "Independent_RISHIKESH_5": "Independent_RISHIKESH_5", "Independent_RISHIKESH_6": "Independent_RISHIKESH_6", "Independent_RISHIKESH_7": "Independent_RISHIKESH_7", "Independent_RISHIKESH_8": "Independent_RISHIKESH_8", "Independent_RISHIKESH_9": "Independent_RISHIKESH_9", "Independent_HARDWAR_1": "Independent_HARDWAR_1", "Independent_HARDWAR_2": "Independent_HARDWAR_2", "Independent_HARDWAR_3": "Independent_HARDWAR_3", "party_RKSP": "party_RKSP", "Independent_HARDWAR_4": "Independent_HARDWAR_4", "Independent_HARDWAR_5": "Independent_HARDWAR_5", "Independent_HARDWAR_6": "Independent_HARDWAR_6", "party_MAJP": "party_MAJP", "Independent_HARDWAR_7": "Independent_HARDWAR_7", "Independent_HARDWAR_8": "Independent_HARDWAR_8", "Independent_B_H_E_L_RANIPUR_1": "Independent_B_H_E_L_RANIPUR_1", "Independent_B_H_E_L_RANIPUR_2": "Independent_B_H_E_L_RANIPUR_2", "Independent_B_H_E_L_RANIPUR_3": "Independent_B_H_E_L_RANIPUR_3", "Independent_B_H_E_L_RANIPUR_4": "Independent_B_H_E_L_RANIPUR_4", "Independent_B_H_E_L_RANIPUR_5": "Independent_B_H_E_L_RANIPUR_5", "Independent_B_H_E_L_RANIPUR_6": "Independent_B_H_E_L_RANIPUR_6", "Independent_B_H_E_L_RANIPUR_7": "Independent_B_H_E_L_RANIPUR_7", "Independent_B_H_E_L_RANIPUR_8": "Independent_B_H_E_L_RANIPUR_8", "Independent_B_H_E_L_RANIPUR_9": "Independent_B_H_E_L_RANIPUR_9", "party_RLNP": "party_RLNP", "Independent_JWALAPUR_1": "Independent_JWALAPUR_1", "Independent_JWALAPUR_2": "Independent_JWALAPUR_2", "Independent_JWALAPUR_3": "Independent_JWALAPUR_3", "Independent_JHABRERA_1": "Independent_JHABRERA_1", "Independent_JHABRERA_2": "Independent_JHABRERA_2", "party_IVD": "party_IVD", "Independent_PIRANKALIYAR_1": "Independent_PIRANKALIYAR_1", "Independent_PIRANKALIYAR_2": "Independent_PIRANKALIYAR_2", "Independent_PIRANKALIYAR_3": "Independent_PIRANKALIYAR_3", "Independent_PIRANKALIYAR_4": "Independent_PIRANKALIYAR_4", "party_MD": "party_MD", "Independent_PIRANKALIYAR_5": "Independent_PIRANKALIYAR_5", "Independent_ROORKEE_1": "Independent_ROORKEE_1", "Independent_ROORKEE_2": "Independent_ROORKEE_2", "Independent_ROORKEE_3": "Independent_ROORKEE_3", "Independent_ROORKEE_4": "Independent_ROORKEE_4", "Independent_ROORKEE_5": "Independent_ROORKEE_5", "Independent_ROORKEE_6": "Independent_ROORKEE_6", "Independent_ROORKEE_7": "Independent_ROORKEE_7", "Independent_KHANPUR_1": "Independent_KHANPUR_1", "Independent_KHANPUR_2": "Independent_KHANPUR_2", "Independent_MANGLORE_1": "Independent_MANGLORE_1", "Independent_MANGLORE_2": "Independent_MANGLORE_2", "Independent_MANGLORE_3": "Independent_MANGLORE_3", "Independent_LAKSAR_1": "Independent_LAKSAR_1", "Independent_LAKSAR_2": "Independent_LAKSAR_2", "Independent_LAKSAR_3": "Independent_LAKSAR_3", "Independent_LAKSAR_4": "Independent_LAKSAR_4", "party_NAP": "party_NAP", "Independent_HARDWAR_RURAL_1": "Independent_HARDWAR_RURAL_1", "Independent_HARDWAR_RURAL_2": "Independent_HARDWAR_RURAL_2", "Independent_HARDWAR_RURAL_3": "Independent_HARDWAR_RURAL_3", "Independent_HARDWAR_RURAL_4": "Independent_HARDWAR_RURAL_4", "Independent_HARDWAR_RURAL_5": "Independent_HARDWAR_RURAL_5", "Independent_HARDWAR_RURAL_6": "Independent_HARDWAR_RURAL_6", "Independent_YAMKESHWAR_1": "Independent_YAMKESHWAR_1", "Independent_YAMKESHWAR_2": "Independent_YAMKESHWAR_2", "Independent_YAMKESHWAR_3": "Independent_YAMKESHWAR_3", "Independent_YAMKESHWAR_4": "Independent_YAMKESHWAR_4", "Independent_YAMKESHWAR_5": "Independent_YAMKESHWAR_5", "Independent_YAMKESHWAR_6": "Independent_YAMKESHWAR_6", "Independent_PAURI_1": "Independent_PAURI_1", "Independent_PAURI_2": "Independent_PAURI_2", "Independent_PAURI_3": "Independent_PAURI_3", "Independent_SRINAGAR_1": "Independent_SRINAGAR_1", "Independent_SRINAGAR_2": "Independent_SRINAGAR_2", "Independent_SRINAGAR_3": "Independent_SRINAGAR_3", "Independent_CHAUBATTAKHAL_1": "Independent_CHAUBATTAKHAL_1", "Independent_CHAUBATTAKHAL_2": "Independent_CHAUBATTAKHAL_2", "Independent_CHAUBATTAKHAL_3": "Independent_CHAUBATTAKHAL_3", "Independent_CHAUBATTAKHAL_4": "Independent_CHAUBATTAKHAL_4", "Independent_CHAUBATTAKHAL_5": "Independent_CHAUBATTAKHAL_5", "Independent_LANSDOWNE_1": "Independent_LANSDOWNE_1", "Independent_LANSDOWNE_2": "Independent_LANSDOWNE_2", "Independent_LANSDOWNE_3": "Independent_LANSDOWNE_3", "Independent_LANSDOWNE_4": "Independent_LANSDOWNE_4", "Independent_KOTDWAR_1": "Independent_KOTDWAR_1", "Independent_KOTDWAR_2": "Independent_KOTDWAR_2", "Independent_DHARCHULA_1": "Independent_DHARCHULA_1", "Independent_DHARCHULA_2": "Independent_DHARCHULA_2", "Independent_DHARCHULA_3": "Independent_DHARCHULA_3", "Independent_DHARCHULA_4": "Independent_DHARCHULA_4", "Independent_DHARCHULA_5": "Independent_DHARCHULA_5", "Independent_DIDIHAT_1": "Independent_DIDIHAT_1", "Independent_PITHORAGARH_1": "Independent_PITHORAGARH_1", "Independent_GANGOLIHAT_1": "Independent_GANGOLIHAT_1", "Independent_KAPKOTE_1": "Independent_KAPKOTE_1", "Independent_KAPKOTE_2": "Independent_KAPKOTE_2", "Independent_KAPKOTE_3": "Independent_KAPKOTE_3", "Independent_KAPKOTE_4": "Independent_KAPKOTE_4", "party_HND": "party_HND", "Independent_BAGESHWAR_1": "Independent_BAGESHWAR_1", "Independent_BAGESHWAR_2": "Independent_BAGESHWAR_2", "Independent_DWARAHAT_1": "Independent_DWARAHAT_1", "Independent_DWARAHAT_2": "Independent_DWARAHAT_2", "Independent_DWARAHAT_3": "Independent_DWARAHAT_3", "Independent_DWARAHAT_4": "Independent_DWARAHAT_4", "Independent_SALT_1": "Independent_SALT_1", "Independent_RANIKHET_1": "Independent_RANIKHET_1", "Independent_RANIKHET_2": "Independent_RANIKHET_2", "Independent_SOMESHWAR_1": "Independent_SOMESHWAR_1", "Independent_ALMORA_1": "Independent_ALMORA_1", "Independent_ALMORA_2": "Independent_ALMORA_2", "Independent_ALMORA_3": "Independent_ALMORA_3", "Independent_ALMORA_4": "Independent_ALMORA_4", "Independent_JAGESHWAR_1": "Independent_JAGESHWAR_1", "Independent_CHAMPAWAT_1": "Independent_CHAMPAWAT_1", "Independent_CHAMPAWAT_2": "Independent_CHAMPAWAT_2", "Independent_CHAMPAWAT_3": "Independent_CHAMPAWAT_3", "Independent_CHAMPAWAT_4": "Independent_CHAMPAWAT_4", "Independent_CHAMPAWAT_5": "Independent_CHAMPAWAT_5", "Independent_CHAMPAWAT_6": "Independent_CHAMPAWAT_6", "Independent_LALKUWA_1": "Independent_LALKUWA_1", "Independent_LALKUWA_2": "Independent_LALKUWA_2", "Independent_LALKUWA_3": "Independent_LALKUWA_3", "Independent_LALKUWA_4": "Independent_LALKUWA_4", "Independent_LALKUWA_5": "Independent_LALKUWA_5", "party_BCP": "party_BCP", "Independent_BHIMTAL_1": "Independent_BHIMTAL_1", "Independent_BHIMTAL_2": "Independent_BHIMTAL_2", "Independent_BHIMTAL_3": "Independent_BHIMTAL_3", "Independent_BHIMTAL_4": "Independent_BHIMTAL_4", "Independent_BHIMTAL_5": "Independent_BHIMTAL_5", "Independent_NAINITAL_1": "Independent_NAINITAL_1", "Independent_HALDWANI_1": "Independent_HALDWANI_1", "Independent_HALDWANI_2": "Independent_HALDWANI_2", "Independent_HALDWANI_3": "Independent_HALDWANI_3", "Independent_HALDWANI_4": "Independent_HALDWANI_4", "Independent_KALADHUNGI_1": "Independent_KALADHUNGI_1", "Independent_KALADHUNGI_2": "Independent_KALADHUNGI_2", "Independent_KALADHUNGI_3": "Independent_KALADHUNGI_3", "Independent_KALADHUNGI_4": "Independent_KALADHUNGI_4", "Independent_RAMNAGAR_1": "Independent_RAMNAGAR_1", "Independent_RAMNAGAR_2": "Independent_RAMNAGAR_2", "Independent_RAMNAGAR_3": "Independent_RAMNAGAR_3", "Independent_RAMNAGAR_4": "Independent_RAMNAGAR_4", "Independent_RAMNAGAR_5": "Independent_RAMNAGAR_5", "Independent_RAMNAGAR_6": "Independent_RAMNAGAR_6", "Independent_JASPUR_1": "Independent_JASPUR_1", "Independent_JASPUR_2": "Independent_JASPUR_2", "Independent_JASPUR_3": "Independent_JASPUR_3", "Independent_JASPUR_4": "Independent_JASPUR_4", "Independent_JASPUR_5": "Independent_JASPUR_5", "Independent_JASPUR_6": "Independent_JASPUR_6", "Independent_KASHIPUR_1": "Independent_KASHIPUR_1", "Independent_KASHIPUR_2": "Independent_KASHIPUR_2", "Independent_KASHIPUR_3": "Independent_KASHIPUR_3", "Independent_KASHIPUR_4": "Independent_KASHIPUR_4", "Independent_BAJPUR_1": "Independent_BAJPUR_1", "Independent_BAJPUR_2": "Independent_BAJPUR_2", "Independent_GADARPUR_1": "Independent_GADARPUR_1", "Independent_GADARPUR_2": "Independent_GADARPUR_2", "party_SBSP": "party_SBSP", "Independent_RUDRAPUR_1": "Independent_RUDRAPUR_1", "Independent_RUDRAPUR_2": "Independent_RUDRAPUR_2", "Independent_RUDRAPUR_3": "Independent_RUDRAPUR_3", "Independent_RUDRAPUR_4": "Independent_RUDRAPUR_4", "party_PECP": "party_PECP", "Independent_KICHHA_1": "Independent_KICHHA_1", "Independent_KICHHA_2": "Independent_KICHHA_2", "Independent_SITARGANJ_1": "Independent_SITARGANJ_1", "Independent_SITARGANJ_2": "Independent_SITARGANJ_2", "Independent_NANAK_MATTA_1": "Independent_NANAK_MATTA_1", "Independent_NANAK_MATTA_2": "Independent_NANAK_MATTA_2", "Independent_KHATIMA_1": "Independent_KHATIMA_1", "Independent_KHATIMA_2": "Independent_KHATIMA_2", "Independent_KHATIMA_3": "Independent_KHATIMA_3", "Independent_KHATIMA_4": "Independent_KHATIMA_4", "Independent_KHATIMA_5": "Independent_KHATIMA_5", "party_ARVP": "party_ARVP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 70, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 70, "registered_not_positive": 70}, "n_stations_flagged": 70, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:51:29.877921", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.646, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.666, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.659, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.525, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.444, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.659, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.409, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.409, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.582, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 70}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ff03d53eb9544170a020cf7627dda076", "name": "India 2017 local (overnight india-uttar-pradesh-2017-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2017, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Uttar_Pradesh/Uttar_Pradesh_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"INC": "INC", "BJP": "BJP", "BSP": "BSP", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "NOTA": "NOTA", "BHASP": "BHASP", "RLD": "RLD", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "Independent_1_3": "Independent_1_3", "Independent_1_4": "Independent_1_4", "Independent_1_5": "Independent_1_5", "BHATARSP": "BHATARSP", "BMUP": "BMUP", "Independent_1_6": "Independent_1_6", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "Independent_2_3": "Independent_2_3", "ASP": "ASP", "Independent_2_4": "Independent_2_4", "Independent_2_5": "Independent_2_5", "SP": "SP", "AIMIM": "AIMIM", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "PBI": "PBI", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "Independent_3_3": "Independent_3_3", "SWAJANPA": "SWAJANPA", "OP": "OP", "SHS": "SHS", "Independent_3_4": "Independent_3_4", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "LD": "LD", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "Independent_4_4": "Independent_4_4", "JANADIP": "JANADIP", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "Independent_5_2": "Independent_5_2", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "Independent_6_2": "Independent_6_2", "RGD": "RGD", "KSJP": "KSJP", "IVD": "IVD", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "SARSAMP": "SARSAMP", "Independent_7_2": "Independent_7_2", "Independent_7_3": "Independent_7_3", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "Independent_8_3": "Independent_8_3", "BAVAP": "BAVAP", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "Independent_9_2": "Independent_9_2", "Independent_9_3": "Independent_9_3", "Independent_9_4": "Independent_9_4", "Independent_9_5": "Independent_9_5", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "PECP": "PECP", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "Independent_10_3": "Independent_10_3", "Independent_10_4": "Independent_10_4", "BJD_T": "BJD_T", "Independent_10_5": "Independent_10_5", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "NINSHAD": "NINSHAD", "NALP": "NALP", "RKMP": "RKMP", "Independent_11_3": "Independent_11_3", "Independent_11_4": "Independent_11_4", "Independent_11_5": "Independent_11_5", "Independent_11_6": "Independent_11_6", "Independent_11_7": "Independent_11_7", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "JSP": "JSP", "ABVCP": "ABVCP", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "CPI": "CPI", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "Independent_14_3": "Independent_14_3", "Independent_14_4": "Independent_14_4", "BLOKSP": "BLOKSP", "Independent_14_5": "Independent_14_5", "ABHM": "ABHM", "BRJ": "BRJ", "Independent_14_6": "Independent_14_6", "HINUP": "HINUP", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "BBPP": "BBPP", "Independent_15_2": "Independent_15_2", "Independent_15_3": "Independent_15_3", "Independent_15_4": "Independent_15_4", "BASAPA": "BASAPA", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_16_2": "Independent_16_2", "Independent_16_3": "Independent_16_3", "MKUP": "MKUP", "Independent_16_4": "Independent_16_4", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "SAMSAMPA": "SAMSAMPA", "Independent_17_3": "Independent_17_3", "ADPT": "ADPT", "BMF": "BMF", "GKP": "GKP", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_18_3": "Independent_18_3", "BLSP": "BLSP", "Independent_18_4": "Independent_18_4", "VIP": "VIP", "NAAP": "NAAP", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "BAHAP": "BAHAP", "Independent_19_3": "Independent_19_3", "Independent_19_4": "Independent_19_4", "Independent_19_5": "Independent_19_5", "Independent_19_6": "Independent_19_6", "Independent_19_7": "Independent_19_7", "Independent_19_8": "Independent_19_8", "Independent_19_9": "Independent_19_9", "Independent_19_10": "Independent_19_10", "BSRD": "BSRD", "Independent_19_11": "Independent_19_11", "Independent_19_12": "Independent_19_12", "Independent_19_13": "Independent_19_13", "ANC": "ANC", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_20_2": "Independent_20_2", "AKSP": "AKSP", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_21_2": "Independent_21_2", "Independent_21_3": "Independent_21_3", "Independent_21_4": "Independent_21_4", "UPRP": "UPRP", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_22_2": "Independent_22_2", "AIMF": "AIMF", "RMGP": "RMGP", "CPM": "CPM", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_23_2": "Independent_23_2", "Independent_23_3": "Independent_23_3", "Independent_23_4": "Independent_23_4", "MD": "MD", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "Independent_24_2": "Independent_24_2", "Independent_24_3": "Independent_24_3", "Independent_24_4": "Independent_24_4", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "NCP": "NCP", "Independent_25_4": "Independent_25_4", "RACP": "RACP", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "Independent_26_3": "Independent_26_3", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "Independent_27_3": "Independent_27_3", "Independent_27_4": "Independent_27_4", "Independent_27_5": "Independent_27_5", "Independent_27_6": "Independent_27_6", "AVIRP": "AVIRP", "RPI_A": "RPI_A", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "SUCI": "SUCI", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "RAC": "RAC", "RMEP": "RMEP", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "Independent_29_4": "Independent_29_4", "Independent_29_5": "Independent_29_5", "JASD": "JASD", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "Independent_30_3": "Independent_30_3", "Independent_30_4": "Independent_30_4", "Independent_30_5": "Independent_30_5", "Independent_30_6": "Independent_30_6", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_31_2": "Independent_31_2", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_32_3": "Independent_32_3", "Independent_32_4": "Independent_32_4", "Independent_32_5": "Independent_32_5", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "MNDP": "MNDP", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "JASSP": "JASSP", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "Independent_35_2": "Independent_35_2", "LPI_V": "LPI_V", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "SKLP": "SKLP", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_40_3": "Independent_40_3", "AICP": "AICP", "RMJP": "RMJP", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "Independent_41_3": "Independent_41_3", "Independent_41_4": "Independent_41_4", "Independent_41_5": "Independent_41_5", "Independent_41_6": "Independent_41_6", "RJSNP": "RJSNP", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "RLRP": "RLRP", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_43_2": "Independent_43_2", "Independent_43_3": "Independent_43_3", "Independent_43_4": "Independent_43_4", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "Independent_44_3": "Independent_44_3", "UDFS": "UDFS", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "Independent_46_3": "Independent_46_3", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "Independent_47_3": "Independent_47_3", "HND": "HND", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_48_2": "Independent_48_2", "Independent_48_3": "Independent_48_3", "Independent_48_4": "Independent_48_4", "Independent_48_5": "Independent_48_5", "Independent_48_6": "Independent_48_6", "Independent_48_7": "Independent_48_7", "Independent_48_8": "Independent_48_8", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "Independent_49_3": "Independent_49_3", "Independent_49_4": "Independent_49_4", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "SASPA": "SASPA", "IEMC": "IEMC", "SABHP": "SABHP", "AJPR": "AJPR", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "SWPI": "SWPI", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "Independent_52_3": "Independent_52_3", "BNIP": "BNIP", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "Independent_53_2": "Independent_53_2", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_54_3": "Independent_54_3", "LOMP": "LOMP", "Independent_54_4": "Independent_54_4", "Independent_54_5": "Independent_54_5", "Independent_54_6": "Independent_54_6", "NYP": "NYP", "Independent_54_7": "Independent_54_7", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "AZAD": "AZAD", "Independent_55_2": "Independent_55_2", "Independent_55_3": "Independent_55_3", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_56_2": "Independent_56_2", "Independent_56_3": "Independent_56_3", "Independent_56_4": "Independent_56_4", "Independent_56_5": "Independent_56_5", "BJVP": "BJVP", "RPDL": "RPDL", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_57_2": "Independent_57_2", "Independent_57_3": "Independent_57_3", "Independent_58_1": "Independent_58_1", "RSHP": "RSHP", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_59_2": "Independent_59_2", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "Independent_60_3": "Independent_60_3", "Independent_60_4": "Independent_60_4", "Independent_60_5": "Independent_60_5", "BAJD": "BAJD", "Independent_60_6": "Independent_60_6", "RAJP": "RAJP", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "BDSAP": "BDSAP", "JAM": "JAM", "BHABHAPA": "BHABHAPA", "PUPVP": "PUPVP", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_62_3": "Independent_62_3", "Independent_62_4": "Independent_62_4", "Independent_62_5": "Independent_62_5", "HCP": "HCP", "RKIVP": "RKIVP", "Independent_62_6": "Independent_62_6", "RPSN": "RPSN", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "VP": "VP", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_66_2": "Independent_66_2", "Independent_66_3": "Independent_66_3", "SDU": "SDU", "RTKP": "RTKP", "Independent_67_1": "Independent_67_1", "Independent_67_2": "Independent_67_2", "Independent_67_3": "Independent_67_3", "Independent_67_4": "Independent_67_4", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_69_3": "Independent_69_3", "RAJADP": "RAJADP", "Independent_69_4": "Independent_69_4", "Independent_69_5": "Independent_69_5", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "RTJP": "RTJP", "SAJPCS": "SAJPCS", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_72_2": "Independent_72_2", "KMSUP": "KMSUP", "SSKP": "SSKP", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "RPD": "RPD", "Independent_73_3": "Independent_73_3", "RSD": "RSD", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_74_2": "Independent_74_2", "Independent_74_3": "Independent_74_3", "Independent_74_4": "Independent_74_4", "Independent_74_5": "Independent_74_5", "Independent_74_6": "Independent_74_6", "MHP": "MHP", "SARP": "SARP", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_75_2": "Independent_75_2", "Independent_75_3": "Independent_75_3", "Independent_75_4": "Independent_75_4", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_76_3": "Independent_76_3", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_77_2": "Independent_77_2", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_78_2": "Independent_78_2", "Independent_78_3": "Independent_78_3", "ADRSP": "ADRSP", "Independent_79_1": "Independent_79_1", "Independent_79_2": "Independent_79_2", "Independent_79_3": "Independent_79_3", "Independent_79_4": "Independent_79_4", "Independent_79_5": "Independent_79_5", "Independent_79_6": "Independent_79_6", "Independent_79_7": "Independent_79_7", "SAMAP": "SAMAP", "Independent_79_8": "Independent_79_8", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_80_2": "Independent_80_2", "Independent_80_3": "Independent_80_3", "Independent_80_4": "Independent_80_4", "Independent_80_5": "Independent_80_5", "Independent_80_6": "Independent_80_6", "Independent_80_7": "Independent_80_7", "AIFB": "AIFB", "Independent_80_8": "Independent_80_8", "Independent_80_9": "Independent_80_9", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "Independent_81_2": "Independent_81_2", "Independent_81_3": "Independent_81_3", "Independent_81_4": "Independent_81_4", "Independent_82_1": "Independent_82_1", "Independent_82_2": "Independent_82_2", "Independent_82_3": "Independent_82_3", "RSOSP": "RSOSP", "Independent_82_4": "Independent_82_4", "BHAKALP": "BHAKALP", "Independent_82_5": "Independent_82_5", "Independent_82_6": "Independent_82_6", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_83_2": "Independent_83_2", "Independent_83_3": "Independent_83_3", "ALHP": "ALHP", "Independent_84_1": "Independent_84_1", "Independent_84_2": "Independent_84_2", "Independent_84_3": "Independent_84_3", "Independent_84_4": "Independent_84_4", "RSP_S": "RSP_S", "Independent_85_1": "Independent_85_1", "Independent_85_2": "Independent_85_2", "Independent_85_3": "Independent_85_3", "Independent_85_4": "Independent_85_4", "Independent_85_5": "Independent_85_5", "RKSP": "RKSP", "Independent_86_1": "Independent_86_1", "Independent_86_2": "Independent_86_2", "Independent_86_3": "Independent_86_3", "Independent_86_4": "Independent_86_4", "RPIE": "RPIE", "Independent_87_1": "Independent_87_1", "Independent_87_2": "Independent_87_2", "APOI": "APOI", "Independent_87_3": "Independent_87_3", "Independent_87_4": "Independent_87_4", "Independent_87_5": "Independent_87_5", "RSMD": "RSMD", "Independent_88_1": "Independent_88_1", "Independent_88_2": "Independent_88_2", "MAHISAP": "MAHISAP", "Independent_88_3": "Independent_88_3", "Independent_88_4": "Independent_88_4", "Independent_88_5": "Independent_88_5", "Independent_88_6": "Independent_88_6", "Independent_88_7": "Independent_88_7", "Independent_88_8": "Independent_88_8", "Independent_88_9": "Independent_88_9", "BKS": "BKS", "Independent_88_10": "Independent_88_10", "Independent_88_11": "Independent_88_11", "Independent_88_12": "Independent_88_12", "BRKD": "BRKD", "Independent_88_13": "Independent_88_13", "Independent_88_14": "Independent_88_14", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_89_2": "Independent_89_2", "Independent_89_3": "Independent_89_3", "Independent_89_4": "Independent_89_4", "Independent_89_5": "Independent_89_5", "Independent_89_6": "Independent_89_6", "BSCP": "BSCP", "Independent_90_1": "Independent_90_1", "Independent_90_2": "Independent_90_2", "Independent_90_3": "Independent_90_3", "Independent_90_4": "Independent_90_4", "Independent_91_1": "Independent_91_1", "Independent_91_2": "Independent_91_2", "Independent_91_3": "Independent_91_3", "Independent_92_1": "Independent_92_1", "Independent_92_2": "Independent_92_2", "Independent_92_3": "Independent_92_3", "Independent_92_4": "Independent_92_4", "Independent_92_5": "Independent_92_5", "Independent_92_6": "Independent_92_6", "Independent_92_7": "Independent_92_7", "Independent_92_8": "Independent_92_8", "Independent_93_1": "Independent_93_1", "SSAD": "SSAD", "Independent_94_1": "Independent_94_1", "Independent_94_2": "Independent_94_2", "Independent_94_3": "Independent_94_3", "Independent_94_4": "Independent_94_4", "Independent_94_5": "Independent_94_5", "UNP": "UNP", "Independent_94_6": "Independent_94_6", "Independent_95_1": "Independent_95_1", "Independent_95_2": "Independent_95_2", "Independent_95_3": "Independent_95_3", "Independent_95_4": "Independent_95_4", "Independent_95_5": "Independent_95_5", "Independent_96_1": "Independent_96_1", "Independent_96_2": "Independent_96_2", "Independent_96_3": "Independent_96_3", "HDVP": "HDVP", "Independent_97_1": "Independent_97_1", "Independent_97_2": "Independent_97_2", "IUML": "IUML", "BKPP": "BKPP", "MNVP": "MNVP", "Independent_98_1": "Independent_98_1", "Independent_98_2": "Independent_98_2", "Independent_98_3": "Independent_98_3", "Independent_98_4": "Independent_98_4", "Independent_99_1": "Independent_99_1", "Independent_99_2": "Independent_99_2", "Independent_99_3": "Independent_99_3", "Independent_99_4": "Independent_99_4", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_100_2": "Independent_100_2", "Independent_100_3": "Independent_100_3", "Independent_100_4": "Independent_100_4", "Independent_100_5": "Independent_100_5", "Independent_101_1": "Independent_101_1", "Independent_101_2": "Independent_101_2", "Independent_102_1": "Independent_102_1", "Independent_102_2": "Independent_102_2", "Independent_102_3": "Independent_102_3", "Independent_102_4": "Independent_102_4", "Independent_102_5": "Independent_102_5", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_103_2": "Independent_103_2", "Independent_103_3": "Independent_103_3", "Independent_103_4": "Independent_103_4", "Independent_103_5": "Independent_103_5", "Independent_103_6": "Independent_103_6", "Independent_103_7": "Independent_103_7", "Independent_103_8": "Independent_103_8", "Independent_103_9": "Independent_103_9", "Independent_103_10": "Independent_103_10", "Independent_104_1": "Independent_104_1", "Independent_104_2": "Independent_104_2", "Independent_104_3": "Independent_104_3", "Independent_104_4": "Independent_104_4", "Independent_104_5": "Independent_104_5", "VPI": "VPI", "Independent_104_6": "Independent_104_6", "Independent_105_1": "Independent_105_1", "Independent_105_2": "Independent_105_2", "Independent_105_3": "Independent_105_3", "Independent_106_1": "Independent_106_1", "Independent_106_2": "Independent_106_2", "Independent_106_3": "Independent_106_3", "Independent_106_4": "Independent_106_4", "Independent_106_5": "Independent_106_5", "Independent_107_1": "Independent_107_1", "Independent_107_2": "Independent_107_2", "Independent_107_3": "Independent_107_3", "Independent_107_4": "Independent_107_4", "Independent_107_5": "Independent_107_5", "Independent_108_1": "Independent_108_1", "Independent_108_2": "Independent_108_2", "Independent_108_3": "Independent_108_3", "Independent_109_1": "Independent_109_1", "Independent_109_2": "Independent_109_2", "Independent_109_3": "Independent_109_3", "Independent_109_4": "Independent_109_4", "FJP": "FJP", "Independent_110_1": "Independent_110_1", "Independent_110_2": "Independent_110_2", "Independent_110_3": "Independent_110_3", "Independent_110_4": "Independent_110_4", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "Independent_111_2": "Independent_111_2", "Independent_111_3": "Independent_111_3", "PPS": "PPS", "Independent_112_1": "Independent_112_1", "Independent_114_1": "Independent_114_1", "Independent_114_2": "Independent_114_2", "Independent_114_3": "Independent_114_3", "Independent_114_4": "Independent_114_4", "Independent_114_5": "Independent_114_5", "Independent_114_6": "Independent_114_6", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_115_2": "Independent_115_2", "Independent_115_3": "Independent_115_3", "Independent_115_4": "Independent_115_4", "Independent_115_5": "Independent_115_5", "KAJP": "KAJP", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "DESP": "DESP", "Independent_117_1": "Independent_117_1", "Independent_117_2": "Independent_117_2", "Independent_118_1": "Independent_118_1", "Independent_118_2": "Independent_118_2", "Independent_118_3": "Independent_118_3", "Independent_118_4": "Independent_118_4", "JSEP": "JSEP", "Independent_118_5": "Independent_118_5", "BHIP": "BHIP", "Independent_119_1": "Independent_119_1", "Independent_119_2": "Independent_119_2", "Independent_120_1": "Independent_120_1", "Independent_120_2": "Independent_120_2", "Independent_120_3": "Independent_120_3", "Independent_120_4": "Independent_120_4", "Independent_121_1": "Independent_121_1", "Independent_121_2": "Independent_121_2", "Independent_121_3": "Independent_121_3", "Independent_121_4": "Independent_121_4", "Independent_122_1": "Independent_122_1", "Independent_123_1": "Independent_123_1", "LPSP": "LPSP", "Independent_124_1": "Independent_124_1", "Independent_124_2": "Independent_124_2", "Independent_124_3": "Independent_124_3", "Independent_124_4": "Independent_124_4", "Independent_125_1": "Independent_125_1", "PLM": "PLM", "JANJAN": "JANJAN", "Independent_126_1": "Independent_126_1", "Independent_126_2": "Independent_126_2", "Independent_127_1": "Independent_127_1", "Independent_127_2": "Independent_127_2", "Independent_127_3": "Independent_127_3", "Independent_127_4": "Independent_127_4", "Independent_128_1": "Independent_128_1", "Independent_128_2": "Independent_128_2", "Independent_128_3": "Independent_128_3", "Independent_128_4": "Independent_128_4", "MANKP": "MANKP", "CPI_ML_L": "CPI_ML_L", "Independent_129_1": "Independent_129_1", "Independent_130_1": "Independent_130_1", "Independent_130_2": "Independent_130_2", "Independent_131_1": "Independent_131_1", "Independent_131_2": "Independent_131_2", "RAJAP": "RAJAP", "Independent_131_3": "Independent_131_3", "Independent_131_4": "Independent_131_4", "Independent_131_5": "Independent_131_5", "Independent_132_1": "Independent_132_1", "Independent_132_2": "Independent_132_2", "RVNP": "RVNP", "Independent_133_1": "Independent_133_1", "BKRD": "BKRD", "Independent_133_2": "Independent_133_2", "Independent_133_3": "Independent_133_3", "Independent_133_4": "Independent_133_4", "Independent_134_1": "Independent_134_1", "Independent_134_2": "Independent_134_2", "Independent_134_3": "Independent_134_3", "Independent_134_4": "Independent_134_4", "Independent_135_1": "Independent_135_1", "Independent_135_2": "Independent_135_2", "Independent_135_3": "Independent_135_3", "Independent_135_4": "Independent_135_4", "Independent_135_5": "Independent_135_5", "Independent_136_1": "Independent_136_1", "Independent_136_2": "Independent_136_2", "Independent_136_3": "Independent_136_3", "Independent_136_4": "Independent_136_4", "Independent_137_1": "Independent_137_1", "Independent_137_2": "Independent_137_2", "Independent_137_3": "Independent_137_3", "RVIP": "RVIP", "KISP": "KISP", "Independent_138_1": "Independent_138_1", "PMHP": "PMHP", "Independent_139_1": "Independent_139_1", "Independent_139_2": "Independent_139_2", "RALOPA": "RALOPA", "RBCP": "RBCP", "Independent_141_1": "Independent_141_1", "Independent_142_1": "Independent_142_1", "BHAJSP": "BHAJSP", "Independent_143_1": "Independent_143_1", "Independent_144_1": "Independent_144_1", "Independent_144_2": "Independent_144_2", "Independent_144_3": "Independent_144_3", "Independent_145_1": "Independent_145_1", "Independent_145_2": "Independent_145_2", "Independent_145_3": "Independent_145_3", "Independent_145_4": "Independent_145_4", "JHSPT": "JHSPT", "Independent_145_5": "Independent_145_5", "Independent_146_1": "Independent_146_1", "Independent_146_2": "Independent_146_2", "Independent_146_3": "Independent_146_3", "Independent_146_4": "Independent_146_4", "AIPJSP": "AIPJSP", "Independent_146_5": "Independent_146_5", "Independent_147_1": "Independent_147_1", "LOGAP": "LOGAP", "Independent_148_1": "Independent_148_1", "Independent_148_2": "Independent_148_2", "Independent_148_3": "Independent_148_3", "ASAP": "ASAP", "Independent_148_4": "Independent_148_4", "Independent_148_5": "Independent_148_5", "Independent_149_1": "Independent_149_1", "Independent_149_2": "Independent_149_2", "Independent_149_3": "Independent_149_3", "Independent_149_4": "Independent_149_4", "Independent_150_1": "Independent_150_1", "Independent_150_2": "Independent_150_2", "SP_I": "SP_I", "Independent_151_1": "Independent_151_1", "Independent_152_1": "Independent_152_1", "Independent_153_1": "Independent_153_1", "Independent_153_2": "Independent_153_2", "Independent_153_3": "Independent_153_3", "Independent_154_1": "Independent_154_1", "Independent_154_2": "Independent_154_2", "Independent_154_3": "Independent_154_3", "Independent_154_4": "Independent_154_4", "RASHVIP": "RASHVIP", "Independent_155_1": "Independent_155_1", "Independent_155_2": "Independent_155_2", "Independent_155_3": "Independent_155_3", "BAHUMP": "BAHUMP", "Independent_156_1": "Independent_156_1", "Independent_156_2": "Independent_156_2", "Independent_156_3": "Independent_156_3", "Independent_156_4": "Independent_156_4", "Independent_156_5": "Independent_156_5", "Independent_156_6": "Independent_156_6", "Independent_156_7": "Independent_156_7", "Independent_156_8": "Independent_156_8", "Independent_157_1": "Independent_157_1", "Independent_157_2": "Independent_157_2", "Independent_157_3": "Independent_157_3", "Independent_157_4": "Independent_157_4", "Independent_158_1": "Independent_158_1", "Independent_158_2": "Independent_158_2", "Independent_158_3": "Independent_158_3", "Independent_158_4": "Independent_158_4", "Independent_158_5": "Independent_158_5", "Independent_158_6": "Independent_158_6", "Independent_159_1": "Independent_159_1", "Independent_159_2": "Independent_159_2", "Independent_159_3": "Independent_159_3", "Independent_159_4": "Independent_159_4", "Independent_159_5": "Independent_159_5", "Independent_160_1": "Independent_160_1", "Independent_160_2": "Independent_160_2", "Independent_160_3": "Independent_160_3", "Independent_161_1": "Independent_161_1", "Independent_161_2": "Independent_161_2", "Independent_161_3": "Independent_161_3", "Independent_161_4": "Independent_161_4", "Independent_161_5": "Independent_161_5", "Independent_161_6": "Independent_161_6", "Independent_162_1": "Independent_162_1", "Independent_162_2": "Independent_162_2", "Independent_162_3": "Independent_162_3", "Independent_162_4": "Independent_162_4", "Independent_162_5": "Independent_162_5", "HKRD": "HKRD", "MWSP": "MWSP", "Independent_163_1": "Independent_163_1", "Independent_163_2": "Independent_163_2", "Independent_163_3": "Independent_163_3", "Independent_164_1": "Independent_164_1", "Independent_164_2": "Independent_164_2", "Independent_165_1": "Independent_165_1", "Independent_165_2": "Independent_165_2", "RVLP": "RVLP", "Independent_165_3": "Independent_165_3", "Independent_165_4": "Independent_165_4", "Independent_165_5": "Independent_165_5", "Independent_166_1": "Independent_166_1", "RSPS": "RSPS", "Independent_167_1": "Independent_167_1", "Independent_168_1": "Independent_168_1", "Independent_168_2": "Independent_168_2", "PDD": "PDD", "Independent_169_1": "Independent_169_1", "Independent_169_2": "Independent_169_2", "Independent_170_1": "Independent_170_1", "Independent_170_2": "Independent_170_2", "Independent_170_3": "Independent_170_3", "Independent_170_4": "Independent_170_4", "Independent_170_5": "Independent_170_5", "BKRP": "BKRP", "Independent_170_6": "Independent_170_6", "RSJNP": "RSJNP", "Independent_171_1": "Independent_171_1", "Independent_171_2": "Independent_171_2", "Independent_171_3": "Independent_171_3", "BHKRDL": "BHKRDL", "Independent_171_4": "Independent_171_4", "Independent_171_5": "Independent_171_5", "Independent_172_1": "Independent_172_1", "Independent_172_2": "Independent_172_2", "ABJS": "ABJS", "Independent_172_3": "Independent_172_3", "ISSP": "ISSP", "MANBP": "MANBP", "Independent_173_1": "Independent_173_1", "Independent_173_2": "Independent_173_2", "UKKD": "UKKD", "JSK": "JSK", "Independent_173_3": "Independent_173_3", "NEP": "NEP", "JSVP": "JSVP", "MASPA": "MASPA", "RAIP": "RAIP", "Independent_175_1": "Independent_175_1", "Independent_175_2": "Independent_175_2", "Independent_175_3": "Independent_175_3", "SASEPA": "SASEPA", "ADVP": "ADVP", "LSWP": "LSWP", "Independent_176_1": "Independent_176_1", "Independent_176_2": "Independent_176_2", "Independent_176_3": "Independent_176_3", "Independent_176_4": "Independent_176_4", "Independent_176_5": "Independent_176_5", "Independent_176_6": "Independent_176_6", "Independent_176_7": "Independent_176_7", "MAKDL": "MAKDL", "Independent_176_8": "Independent_176_8", "Independent_177_1": "Independent_177_1", "Independent_177_2": "Independent_177_2", "Independent_177_3": "Independent_177_3", "Independent_177_4": "Independent_177_4", "Independent_177_5": "Independent_177_5", "Independent_177_6": "Independent_177_6", "Independent_178_1": "Independent_178_1", "MADP": "MADP", "Independent_178_2": "Independent_178_2", "Independent_178_3": "Independent_178_3", "Independent_178_4": "Independent_178_4", "Independent_178_5": "Independent_178_5", "LSPS": "LSPS", "Independent_179_1": "Independent_179_1", "Independent_179_2": "Independent_179_2", "Independent_179_3": "Independent_179_3", "Independent_179_4": "Independent_179_4", "AABHAP": "AABHAP", "Independent_180_1": "Independent_180_1", "Independent_180_2": "Independent_180_2", "Independent_180_3": "Independent_180_3", "JUSTIP": "JUSTIP", "Independent_181_1": "Independent_181_1", "Independent_181_2": "Independent_181_2", "Independent_181_3": "Independent_181_3", "Independent_181_4": "Independent_181_4", "Independent_182_1": "Independent_182_1", "Independent_182_2": "Independent_182_2", "Independent_183_1": "Independent_183_1", "Independent_183_2": "Independent_183_2", "RJAP": "RJAP", "Independent_183_3": "Independent_183_3", "MBCOI": "MBCOI", "Independent_184_1": "Independent_184_1", "Independent_184_2": "Independent_184_2", "Independent_184_3": "Independent_184_3", "KTKD": "KTKD", "Independent_184_4": "Independent_184_4", "Independent_185_1": "Independent_185_1", "Independent_185_2": "Independent_185_2", "Independent_185_3": "Independent_185_3", "Independent_185_4": "Independent_185_4", "Independent_185_5": "Independent_185_5", "Independent_185_6": "Independent_185_6", "MANPA": "MANPA", "Independent_186_1": "Independent_186_1", "Independent_186_2": "Independent_186_2", "Independent_186_3": "Independent_186_3", "Independent_186_4": "Independent_186_4", "Independent_186_5": "Independent_186_5", "Independent_186_6": "Independent_186_6", "Independent_186_7": "Independent_186_7", "Independent_186_8": "Independent_186_8", "Independent_186_9": "Independent_186_9", "Independent_186_10": "Independent_186_10", "Independent_186_11": "Independent_186_11", "Independent_186_12": "Independent_186_12", "JPS": "JPS", "Independent_186_13": "Independent_186_13", "RSHJP": "RSHJP", "BHANYD": "BHANYD", "Independent_187_1": "Independent_187_1", "Independent_187_2": "Independent_187_2", "Independent_187_3": "Independent_187_3", "Independent_187_4": "Independent_187_4", "PMSP": "PMSP", "Independent_188_1": "Independent_188_1", "Independent_188_2": "Independent_188_2", "Independent_188_3": "Independent_188_3", "SATSHIP": "SATSHIP", "Independent_189_1": "Independent_189_1", "Independent_189_2": "Independent_189_2", "Independent_189_3": "Independent_189_3", "Independent_189_4": "Independent_189_4", "Independent_189_5": "Independent_189_5", "Independent_189_6": "Independent_189_6", "Independent_190_1": "Independent_190_1", "Independent_190_2": "Independent_190_2", "Independent_190_3": "Independent_190_3", "SSSP": "SSSP", "PSAVKP": "PSAVKP", "Independent_190_4": "Independent_190_4", "Independent_191_1": "Independent_191_1", "Independent_191_2": "Independent_191_2", "Independent_191_3": "Independent_191_3", "Independent_192_1": "Independent_192_1", "Independent_192_2": "Independent_192_2", "Independent_193_1": "Independent_193_1", "PSWAM": "PSWAM", "Independent_193_2": "Independent_193_2", "Independent_193_3": "Independent_193_3", "Independent_193_4": "Independent_193_4", "Independent_194_1": "Independent_194_1", "Independent_194_2": "Independent_194_2", "Independent_194_3": "Independent_194_3", "Independent_194_4": "Independent_194_4", "Independent_194_5": "Independent_194_5", "Independent_194_6": "Independent_194_6", "Independent_194_7": "Independent_194_7", "Independent_194_8": "Independent_194_8", "Independent_194_9": "Independent_194_9", "RPI": "RPI", "Independent_194_10": "Independent_194_10", "Independent_194_11": "Independent_194_11", "Independent_195_1": "Independent_195_1", "Independent_195_2": "Independent_195_2", "Independent_195_3": "Independent_195_3", "Independent_195_4": "Independent_195_4", "Independent_195_5": "Independent_195_5", "Independent_195_6": "Independent_195_6", "Independent_195_7": "Independent_195_7", "Independent_195_8": "Independent_195_8", "Independent_195_9": "Independent_195_9", "Independent_196_1": "Independent_196_1", "Independent_196_2": "Independent_196_2", "Independent_196_3": "Independent_196_3", "Independent_196_4": "Independent_196_4", "Independent_196_5": "Independent_196_5", "Independent_196_6": "Independent_196_6", "Independent_197_1": "Independent_197_1", "Independent_197_2": "Independent_197_2", "SANVP": "SANVP", "Independent_197_3": "Independent_197_3", "Independent_197_4": "Independent_197_4", "Independent_197_5": "Independent_197_5", "Independent_197_6": "Independent_197_6", "Independent_198_1": "Independent_198_1", "Independent_198_2": "Independent_198_2", "Independent_198_3": "Independent_198_3", "AD": "AD", "Independent_198_4": "Independent_198_4", "Independent_199_1": "Independent_199_1", "Independent_199_2": "Independent_199_2", "Independent_199_3": "Independent_199_3", "Independent_199_4": "Independent_199_4", "BNAVP": "BNAVP", "Independent_200_1": "Independent_200_1", "Independent_200_2": "Independent_200_2", "Independent_200_3": "Independent_200_3", "Independent_200_4": "Independent_200_4", "NASHMBP": "NASHMBP", "LRAP": "LRAP", "Independent_202_1": "Independent_202_1", "Independent_202_2": "Independent_202_2", "Independent_203_1": "Independent_203_1", "Independent_203_2": "Independent_203_2", "Independent_203_3": "Independent_203_3", "Independent_203_4": "Independent_203_4", "Independent_203_5": "Independent_203_5", "Independent_203_6": "Independent_203_6", "Independent_204_1": "Independent_204_1", "Independent_205_1": "Independent_205_1", "Independent_206_1": "Independent_206_1", "Independent_206_2": "Independent_206_2", "SSD": "SSD", "Independent_207_1": "Independent_207_1", "Independent_207_2": "Independent_207_2", "NSPI": "NSPI", "Independent_208_1": "Independent_208_1", "BIRK": "BIRK", "Independent_208_2": "Independent_208_2", "Independent_208_3": "Independent_208_3", "Independent_208_4": "Independent_208_4", "Independent_208_5": "Independent_208_5", "NAPT": "NAPT", "Independent_209_1": "Independent_209_1", "Independent_210_1": "Independent_210_1", "Independent_210_2": "Independent_210_2", "Independent_210_3": "Independent_210_3", "Independent_210_4": "Independent_210_4", "JHJBP": "JHJBP", "Independent_210_5": "Independent_210_5", "BHAIP": "BHAIP", "Independent_211_1": "Independent_211_1", "AAPA": "AAPA", "Independent_213_1": "Independent_213_1", "BPA": "BPA", "RUC": "RUC", "Independent_214_1": "Independent_214_1", "Independent_214_2": "Independent_214_2", "Independent_214_3": "Independent_214_3", "Independent_215_1": "Independent_215_1", "Independent_215_2": "Independent_215_2", "Independent_216_1": "Independent_216_1", "NPPS": "NPPS", "Independent_217_1": "Independent_217_1", "Independent_217_2": "Independent_217_2", "Independent_217_3": "Independent_217_3", "Independent_217_4": "Independent_217_4", "Independent_218_1": "Independent_218_1", "Independent_219_1": "Independent_219_1", "KMBS": "KMBS", "Independent_219_2": "Independent_219_2", "Independent_219_3": "Independent_219_3", "Independent_220_1": "Independent_220_1", "JAPL": "JAPL", "Independent_220_2": "Independent_220_2", "Independent_222_1": "Independent_222_1", "Independent_222_2": "Independent_222_2", "Independent_222_3": "Independent_222_3", "Independent_222_4": "Independent_222_4", "RRSP": "RRSP", "PSJP": "PSJP", "Independent_223_1": "Independent_223_1", "Independent_223_2": "Independent_223_2", "BUNKD": "BUNKD", "Independent_223_3": "Independent_223_3", "Independent_223_4": "Independent_223_4", "Independent_223_5": "Independent_223_5", "Independent_223_6": "Independent_223_6", "HJC": "HJC", "Independent_224_1": "Independent_224_1", "Independent_224_2": "Independent_224_2", "VKP": "VKP", "Independent_225_1": "Independent_225_1", "Independent_225_2": "Independent_225_2", "Independent_225_3": "Independent_225_3", "Independent_225_4": "Independent_225_4", "Independent_226_1": "Independent_226_1", "Independent_226_2": "Independent_226_2", "Independent_226_3": "Independent_226_3", "Independent_226_4": "Independent_226_4", "Independent_227_1": "Independent_227_1", "Independent_227_2": "Independent_227_2", "Independent_227_3": "Independent_227_3", "Independent_227_4": "Independent_227_4", "Independent_227_5": "Independent_227_5", "Independent_227_6": "Independent_227_6", "Independent_228_1": "Independent_228_1", "Independent_228_2": "Independent_228_2", "Independent_229_1": "Independent_229_1", "Independent_230_1": "Independent_230_1", "Independent_230_2": "Independent_230_2", "Independent_230_3": "Independent_230_3", "Independent_231_1": "Independent_231_1", "Independent_231_2": "Independent_231_2", "Independent_231_3": "Independent_231_3", "Independent_231_4": "Independent_231_4", "Independent_231_5": "Independent_231_5", "Independent_232_1": "Independent_232_1", "Independent_232_2": "Independent_232_2", "KYP": "KYP", "Independent_233_1": "Independent_233_1", "Independent_234_1": "Independent_234_1", "Independent_234_2": "Independent_234_2", "Independent_234_3": "Independent_234_3", "Independent_234_4": "Independent_234_4", "Independent_234_5": "Independent_234_5", "Independent_234_6": "Independent_234_6", "Independent_235_1": "Independent_235_1", "Independent_235_2": "Independent_235_2", "Independent_235_3": "Independent_235_3", "Independent_235_4": "Independent_235_4", "Independent_235_5": "Independent_235_5", "Independent_235_6": "Independent_235_6", "Independent_236_1": "Independent_236_1", "Independent_236_2": "Independent_236_2", "RAJSPTY": "RAJSPTY", "Independent_237_1": "Independent_237_1", "Independent_237_2": "Independent_237_2", "Independent_237_3": "Independent_237_3", "SWAP": "SWAP", "Independent_237_4": "Independent_237_4", "ADAL": "ADAL", "AKBSD": "AKBSD", "SADA": "SADA", "Independent_238_1": "Independent_238_1", "Independent_239_1": "Independent_239_1", "Independent_240_1": "Independent_240_1", "Independent_240_2": "Independent_240_2", "Independent_240_3": "Independent_240_3", "Independent_240_4": "Independent_240_4", "Independent_240_5": "Independent_240_5", "Independent_241_1": "Independent_241_1", "Independent_241_2": "Independent_241_2", "Independent_241_3": "Independent_241_3", "Independent_241_4": "Independent_241_4", "Independent_241_5": "Independent_241_5", "Independent_241_6": "Independent_241_6", "Independent_241_7": "Independent_241_7", "Independent_241_8": "Independent_241_8", "Independent_242_1": "Independent_242_1", "Independent_242_2": "Independent_242_2", "BSP_K": "BSP_K", "ALD": "ALD", "BRABSVP": "BRABSVP", "Independent_244_1": "Independent_244_1", "PUPP": "PUPP", "ARK": "ARK", "Independent_245_1": "Independent_245_1", "Independent_245_2": "Independent_245_2", "Independent_245_3": "Independent_245_3", "Independent_245_4": "Independent_245_4", "Independent_246_1": "Independent_246_1", "Independent_246_2": "Independent_246_2", "Independent_246_3": "Independent_246_3", "Independent_247_1": "Independent_247_1", "RTRJP": "RTRJP", "Independent_247_2": "Independent_247_2", "Independent_247_3": "Independent_247_3", "Independent_247_4": "Independent_247_4", "Independent_248_1": "Independent_248_1", "Independent_248_2": "Independent_248_2", "Independent_248_3": "Independent_248_3", "Independent_248_4": "Independent_248_4", "Independent_248_5": "Independent_248_5", "Independent_249_1": "Independent_249_1", "Independent_249_2": "Independent_249_2", "Independent_250_1": "Independent_250_1", "Independent_250_2": "Independent_250_2", "Independent_250_3": "Independent_250_3", "Independent_250_4": "Independent_250_4", "Independent_250_5": "Independent_250_5", "Independent_250_6": "Independent_250_6", "PGSP": "PGSP", "Independent_251_1": "Independent_251_1", "Independent_251_2": "Independent_251_2", "Independent_251_3": "Independent_251_3", "Independent_251_4": "Independent_251_4", "Independent_252_1": "Independent_252_1", "Independent_253_1": "Independent_253_1", "Independent_253_2": "Independent_253_2", "Independent_253_3": "Independent_253_3", "Independent_253_4": "Independent_253_4", "Independent_253_5": "Independent_253_5", "JANKP": "JANKP", "BHSVP": "BHSVP", "Independent_254_1": "Independent_254_1", "BHASAP": "BHASAP", "Independent_254_2": "Independent_254_2", "Independent_254_3": "Independent_254_3", "YVP": "YVP", "BAWPA": "BAWPA", "Independent_255_1": "Independent_255_1", "Independent_255_2": "Independent_255_2", "Independent_256_1": "Independent_256_1", "Independent_256_2": "Independent_256_2", "AYP": "AYP", "Independent_256_3": "Independent_256_3", "Independent_257_1": "Independent_257_1", "Independent_257_2": "Independent_257_2", "Independent_257_3": "Independent_257_3", "Independent_257_4": "Independent_257_4", "Independent_257_5": "Independent_257_5", "Independent_257_6": "Independent_257_6", "Independent_257_7": "Independent_257_7", "Independent_258_1": "Independent_258_1", "Independent_258_2": "Independent_258_2", "NAVSAD": "NAVSAD", "Independent_258_3": "Independent_258_3", "Independent_259_1": "Independent_259_1", "Independent_259_2": "Independent_259_2", "Independent_259_3": "Independent_259_3", "Independent_259_4": "Independent_259_4", "Independent_259_5": "Independent_259_5", "Independent_259_6": "Independent_259_6", "Independent_260_1": "Independent_260_1", "Independent_260_2": "Independent_260_2", "Independent_260_3": "Independent_260_3", "Independent_260_4": "Independent_260_4", "Independent_260_5": "Independent_260_5", "Independent_260_6": "Independent_260_6", "Independent_260_7": "Independent_260_7", "BKSL": "BKSL", "Independent_260_8": "Independent_260_8", "Independent_261_1": "Independent_261_1", "Independent_261_2": "Independent_261_2", "Independent_261_3": "Independent_261_3", "Independent_261_4": "Independent_261_4", "AWVP": "AWVP", "Independent_261_5": "Independent_261_5", "Independent_262_1": "Independent_262_1", "Independent_262_2": "Independent_262_2", "Independent_262_3": "Independent_262_3", "Independent_262_4": "Independent_262_4", "Independent_262_5": "Independent_262_5", "Independent_262_6": "Independent_262_6", "Independent_262_7": "Independent_262_7", "Independent_262_8": "Independent_262_8", "Independent_262_9": "Independent_262_9", "Independent_262_10": "Independent_262_10", "Independent_262_11": "Independent_262_11", "Independent_262_12": "Independent_262_12", "Independent_262_13": "Independent_262_13", "Independent_262_14": "Independent_262_14", "RABAP": "RABAP", "RSAD": "RSAD", "Independent_263_1": "Independent_263_1", "Independent_263_2": "Independent_263_2", "Independent_263_3": "Independent_263_3", "Independent_263_4": "Independent_263_4", "Independent_263_5": "Independent_263_5", "Independent_264_1": "Independent_264_1", "Independent_264_2": "Independent_264_2", "Independent_264_3": "Independent_264_3", "Independent_264_4": "Independent_264_4", "Independent_265_1": "Independent_265_1", "Independent_265_2": "Independent_265_2", "AASAMP": "AASAMP", "Independent_266_1": "Independent_266_1", "Independent_266_2": "Independent_266_2", "Independent_266_3": "Independent_266_3", "HAPA": "HAPA", "BMD": "BMD", "Independent_267_1": "Independent_267_1", "Independent_267_2": "Independent_267_2", "Independent_268_1": "Independent_268_1", "EKSP": "EKSP", "Independent_268_2": "Independent_268_2", "Independent_268_3": "Independent_268_3", "Independent_269_1": "Independent_269_1", "Independent_269_2": "Independent_269_2", "Independent_270_1": "Independent_270_1", "Independent_270_2": "Independent_270_2", "Independent_271_1": "Independent_271_1", "Independent_271_2": "Independent_271_2", "Independent_271_3": "Independent_271_3", "Independent_273_1": "Independent_273_1", "Independent_273_2": "Independent_273_2", "Independent_274_1": "Independent_274_1", "Independent_274_2": "Independent_274_2", "AACP": "AACP", "ADHIKAR": "ADHIKAR", "Independent_275_1": "Independent_275_1", "Independent_276_1": "Independent_276_1", "Independent_277_1": "Independent_277_1", "Independent_278_1": "Independent_278_1", "Independent_279_1": "Independent_279_1", "Independent_279_2": "Independent_279_2", "Independent_280_1": "Independent_280_1", "Independent_280_2": "Independent_280_2", "Independent_281_1": "Independent_281_1", "Independent_281_2": "Independent_281_2", "Independent_281_3": "Independent_281_3", "Independent_281_4": "Independent_281_4", "Independent_282_1": "Independent_282_1", "Independent_282_2": "Independent_282_2", "Independent_282_3": "Independent_282_3", "Independent_282_4": "Independent_282_4", "Independent_282_5": "Independent_282_5", "Independent_283_1": "Independent_283_1", "Independent_283_2": "Independent_283_2", "Independent_283_3": "Independent_283_3", "Independent_284_1": "Independent_284_1", "Independent_284_2": "Independent_284_2", "Independent_284_3": "Independent_284_3", "Independent_284_4": "Independent_284_4", "Independent_284_5": "Independent_284_5", "Independent_285_1": "Independent_285_1", "Independent_285_2": "Independent_285_2", "Independent_285_3": "Independent_285_3", "Independent_285_4": "Independent_285_4", "Independent_285_5": "Independent_285_5", "Independent_286_1": "Independent_286_1", "Independent_286_2": "Independent_286_2", "BDPTY": "BDPTY", "Independent_286_3": "Independent_286_3", "NAP": "NAP", "Independent_287_1": "Independent_287_1", "Independent_287_2": "Independent_287_2", "Independent_287_3": "Independent_287_3", "Independent_288_1": "Independent_288_1", "Independent_289_1": "Independent_289_1", "Independent_289_2": "Independent_289_2", "Independent_289_3": "Independent_289_3", "Independent_289_4": "Independent_289_4", "Independent_289_5": "Independent_289_5", "Independent_289_6": "Independent_289_6", "Independent_290_1": "Independent_290_1", "Independent_290_2": "Independent_290_2", "Independent_290_3": "Independent_290_3", "Independent_290_4": "Independent_290_4", "BKJP": "BKJP", "Independent_290_5": "Independent_290_5", "Independent_291_1": "Independent_291_1", "Independent_291_2": "Independent_291_2", "Independent_291_3": "Independent_291_3", "Independent_291_4": "Independent_291_4", "Independent_291_5": "Independent_291_5", "Independent_291_6": "Independent_291_6", "Independent_291_7": "Independent_291_7", "Independent_292_1": "Independent_292_1", "Independent_292_2": "Independent_292_2", "Independent_292_3": "Independent_292_3", "Independent_292_4": "Independent_292_4", "Independent_292_5": "Independent_292_5", "Independent_292_6": "Independent_292_6", "Independent_292_7": "Independent_292_7", "Independent_293_1": "Independent_293_1", "Independent_293_2": "Independent_293_2", "Independent_293_3": "Independent_293_3", "Independent_293_4": "Independent_293_4", "Independent_293_5": "Independent_293_5", "Independent_293_6": "Independent_293_6", "MAHAD": "MAHAD", "Independent_294_1": "Independent_294_1", "Independent_294_2": "Independent_294_2", "Independent_294_3": "Independent_294_3", "BHASSS": "BHASSS", "Independent_295_1": "Independent_295_1", "Independent_295_2": "Independent_295_2", "Independent_295_3": "Independent_295_3", "Independent_295_4": "Independent_295_4", "Independent_295_5": "Independent_295_5", "Independent_295_6": "Independent_295_6", "Independent_295_7": "Independent_295_7", "Independent_295_8": "Independent_295_8", "Independent_296_1": "Independent_296_1", "Independent_296_2": "Independent_296_2", "Independent_296_3": "Independent_296_3", "Independent_296_4": "Independent_296_4", "Independent_296_5": "Independent_296_5", "Independent_296_6": "Independent_296_6", "Independent_296_7": "Independent_296_7", "Independent_296_8": "Independent_296_8", "Independent_297_1": "Independent_297_1", "Independent_297_2": "Independent_297_2", "Independent_297_3": "Independent_297_3", "Independent_297_4": "Independent_297_4", "Independent_297_5": "Independent_297_5", "Independent_298_1": "Independent_298_1", "Independent_298_2": "Independent_298_2", "Independent_298_3": "Independent_298_3", "Independent_298_4": "Independent_298_4", "Independent_298_5": "Independent_298_5", "Independent_298_6": "Independent_298_6", "Independent_298_7": "Independent_298_7", "Independent_298_8": "Independent_298_8", "Independent_298_9": "Independent_298_9", "Independent_299_1": "Independent_299_1", "Independent_299_2": "Independent_299_2", "Independent_299_3": "Independent_299_3", "Independent_299_4": "Independent_299_4", "Independent_299_5": "Independent_299_5", "Independent_299_6": "Independent_299_6", "Independent_300_1": "Independent_300_1", "Independent_300_2": "Independent_300_2", "Independent_300_3": "Independent_300_3", "Independent_300_4": "Independent_300_4", "Independent_301_1": "Independent_301_1", "Independent_301_2": "Independent_301_2", "Independent_301_3": "Independent_301_3", "Independent_301_4": "Independent_301_4", "Independent_301_5": "Independent_301_5", "Independent_301_6": "Independent_301_6", "Independent_301_7": "Independent_301_7", "Independent_302_1": "Independent_302_1", "Independent_302_2": "Independent_302_2", "Independent_302_3": "Independent_302_3", "Independent_302_4": "Independent_302_4", "AAMJP": "AAMJP", "BJBCD": "BJBCD", "Independent_303_1": "Independent_303_1", "Independent_303_2": "Independent_303_2", "Independent_304_1": "Independent_304_1", "Independent_304_2": "Independent_304_2", "Independent_304_3": "Independent_304_3", "BEP": "BEP", "Independent_305_1": "Independent_305_1", "Independent_306_1": "Independent_306_1", "Independent_306_2": "Independent_306_2", "Independent_307_1": "Independent_307_1", "Independent_307_2": "Independent_307_2", "Independent_307_3": "Independent_307_3", "Independent_307_4": "Independent_307_4", "Independent_307_5": "Independent_307_5", "Independent_307_6": "Independent_307_6", "Independent_308_1": "Independent_308_1", "Independent_308_2": "Independent_308_2", "Independent_309_1": "Independent_309_1", "BASAP": "BASAP", "Independent_309_2": "Independent_309_2", "Independent_309_3": "Independent_309_3", "Independent_310_1": "Independent_310_1", "Independent_310_2": "Independent_310_2", "Independent_310_3": "Independent_310_3", "ABSKP": "ABSKP", "Independent_311_1": "Independent_311_1", "Independent_311_2": "Independent_311_2", "Independent_311_3": "Independent_311_3", "Independent_312_1": "Independent_312_1", "Independent_312_2": "Independent_312_2", "Independent_312_3": "Independent_312_3", "Independent_312_4": "Independent_312_4", "Independent_312_5": "Independent_312_5", "Independent_312_6": "Independent_312_6", "Independent_313_1": "Independent_313_1", "Independent_313_2": "Independent_313_2", "Independent_313_3": "Independent_313_3", "Independent_313_4": "Independent_313_4", "Independent_313_5": "Independent_313_5", "Independent_313_6": "Independent_313_6", "PPI": "PPI", "SASEP": "SASEP", "Independent_313_7": "Independent_313_7", "Independent_313_8": "Independent_313_8", "Independent_313_9": "Independent_313_9", "Independent_313_10": "Independent_313_10", "Independent_314_1": "Independent_314_1", "SHSP": "SHSP", "Independent_314_2": "Independent_314_2", "Independent_315_1": "Independent_315_1", "Independent_316_1": "Independent_316_1", "Independent_317_1": "Independent_317_1", "Independent_317_2": "Independent_317_2", "Independent_317_3": "Independent_317_3", "Independent_318_1": "Independent_318_1", "Independent_318_2": "Independent_318_2", "Independent_319_1": "Independent_319_1", "Independent_319_2": "Independent_319_2", "Independent_319_3": "Independent_319_3", "ABHASP": "ABHASP", "Independent_319_4": "Independent_319_4", "Independent_319_5": "Independent_319_5", "Independent_320_1": "Independent_320_1", "Independent_320_2": "Independent_320_2", "Independent_320_3": "Independent_320_3", "Independent_321_1": "Independent_321_1", "Independent_321_2": "Independent_321_2", "Independent_321_3": "Independent_321_3", "Independent_321_4": "Independent_321_4", "Independent_321_5": "Independent_321_5", "SWJP": "SWJP", "Independent_321_6": "Independent_321_6", "Independent_321_7": "Independent_321_7", "Independent_321_8": "Independent_321_8", "Independent_322_1": "Independent_322_1", "Independent_322_2": "Independent_322_2", "Independent_322_3": "Independent_322_3", "Independent_322_4": "Independent_322_4", "Independent_322_5": "Independent_322_5", "Independent_322_6": "Independent_322_6", "SATKP": "SATKP", "Independent_322_7": "Independent_322_7", "Independent_322_8": "Independent_322_8", "GGP": "GGP", "Independent_322_9": "Independent_322_9", "Independent_322_10": "Independent_322_10", "Independent_322_11": "Independent_322_11", "ADUP": "ADUP", "Independent_323_1": "Independent_323_1", "Independent_323_2": "Independent_323_2", "Independent_324_1": "Independent_324_1", "Independent_324_2": "Independent_324_2", "Independent_324_3": "Independent_324_3", "Independent_325_1": "Independent_325_1", "Independent_325_2": "Independent_325_2", "Independent_326_1": "Independent_326_1", "Independent_326_2": "Independent_326_2", "Independent_326_3": "Independent_326_3", "Independent_326_4": "Independent_326_4", "Independent_326_5": "Independent_326_5", "Independent_326_6": "Independent_326_6", "Independent_326_7": "Independent_326_7", "Independent_327_1": "Independent_327_1", "Independent_328_1": "Independent_328_1", "Independent_328_2": "Independent_328_2", "Independent_328_3": "Independent_328_3", "Independent_329_1": "Independent_329_1", "Independent_329_2": "Independent_329_2", "Independent_329_3": "Independent_329_3", "Independent_329_4": "Independent_329_4", "Independent_329_5": "Independent_329_5", "Independent_329_6": "Independent_329_6", "Independent_330_1": "Independent_330_1", "Independent_330_2": "Independent_330_2", "Independent_330_3": "Independent_330_3", "Independent_330_4": "Independent_330_4", "Independent_330_5": "Independent_330_5", "Independent_330_6": "Independent_330_6", "Independent_330_7": "Independent_330_7", "Independent_330_8": "Independent_330_8", "Independent_331_1": "Independent_331_1", "Independent_331_2": "Independent_331_2", "Independent_331_3": "Independent_331_3", "Independent_331_4": "Independent_331_4", "POOPEP": "POOPEP", "Independent_332_1": "Independent_332_1", "Independent_332_2": "Independent_332_2", "Independent_332_3": "Independent_332_3", "Independent_332_4": "Independent_332_4", "Independent_332_5": "Independent_332_5", "Independent_332_6": "Independent_332_6", "Independent_333_1": "Independent_333_1", "Independent_333_2": "Independent_333_2", "Independent_333_3": "Independent_333_3", "Independent_334_1": "Independent_334_1", "Independent_334_2": "Independent_334_2", "SBSP": "SBSP", "Independent_335_1": "Independent_335_1", "Independent_335_2": "Independent_335_2", "Independent_335_3": "Independent_335_3", "Independent_336_1": "Independent_336_1", "Independent_336_2": "Independent_336_2", "Independent_336_3": "Independent_336_3", "BSNPTY": "BSNPTY", "Independent_337_1": "Independent_337_1", "Independent_337_2": "Independent_337_2", "Independent_337_3": "Independent_337_3", "MOP": "MOP", "Independent_337_4": "Independent_337_4", "Independent_338_1": "Independent_338_1", "Independent_338_2": "Independent_338_2", "BJDI": "BJDI", "BJS": "BJS", "Independent_339_1": "Independent_339_1", "Independent_339_2": "Independent_339_2", "Independent_339_3": "Independent_339_3", "Independent_340_1": "Independent_340_1", "Independent_340_2": "Independent_340_2", "Independent_340_3": "Independent_340_3", "Independent_340_4": "Independent_340_4", "Independent_340_5": "Independent_340_5", "Independent_341_1": "Independent_341_1", "Independent_342_1": "Independent_342_1", "Independent_342_2": "Independent_342_2", "HJ": "HJ", "SASAP": "SASAP", "Independent_343_1": "Independent_343_1", "Independent_343_2": "Independent_343_2", "FDDP": "FDDP", "ASSP": "ASSP", "Independent_344_1": "Independent_344_1", "Independent_345_1": "Independent_345_1", "Independent_345_2": "Independent_345_2", "Independent_345_3": "Independent_345_3", "Independent_346_1": "Independent_346_1", "IPH": "IPH", "Independent_346_2": "Independent_346_2", "RASJM": "RASJM", "Independent_348_1": "Independent_348_1", "Independent_348_2": "Independent_348_2", "Independent_348_3": "Independent_348_3", "Independent_348_4": "Independent_348_4", "Independent_348_5": "Independent_348_5", "Independent_349_1": "Independent_349_1", "Independent_349_2": "Independent_349_2", "Independent_349_3": "Independent_349_3", "Independent_349_4": "Independent_349_4", "Independent_350_1": "Independent_350_1", "Independent_350_2": "Independent_350_2", "Independent_351_1": "Independent_351_1", "MHD": "MHD", "NADEF": "NADEF", "Independent_353_1": "Independent_353_1", "Independent_353_2": "Independent_353_2", "Independent_353_3": "Independent_353_3", "Independent_353_4": "Independent_353_4", "DNP": "DNP", "Independent_354_1": "Independent_354_1", "Independent_354_2": "Independent_354_2", "Independent_354_3": "Independent_354_3", "Independent_354_4": "Independent_354_4", "Independent_354_5": "Independent_354_5", "Independent_354_6": "Independent_354_6", "Independent_354_7": "Independent_354_7", "Independent_356_1": "Independent_356_1", "Independent_356_2": "Independent_356_2", "Independent_357_1": "Independent_357_1", "Independent_357_2": "Independent_357_2", "Independent_357_3": "Independent_357_3", "PAJD": "PAJD", "Independent_357_4": "Independent_357_4", "Independent_358_1": "Independent_358_1", "Independent_358_2": "Independent_358_2", "Independent_358_3": "Independent_358_3", "RJBVP": "RJBVP", "Independent_359_1": "Independent_359_1", "Independent_359_2": "Independent_359_2", "Independent_359_3": "Independent_359_3", "Independent_359_4": "Independent_359_4", "Independent_360_1": "Independent_360_1", "Independent_360_2": "Independent_360_2", "Independent_360_3": "Independent_360_3", "Independent_360_4": "Independent_360_4", "Independent_361_1": "Independent_361_1", "Independent_361_2": "Independent_361_2", "Independent_361_3": "Independent_361_3", "Independent_361_4": "Independent_361_4", "Independent_361_5": "Independent_361_5", "Independent_362_1": "Independent_362_1", "Independent_362_2": "Independent_362_2", "Independent_362_3": "Independent_362_3", "Independent_362_4": "Independent_362_4", "BJKD": "BJKD", "Independent_362_5": "Independent_362_5", "Independent_362_6": "Independent_362_6", "Independent_362_7": "Independent_362_7", "Independent_362_8": "Independent_362_8", "Independent_362_9": "Independent_362_9", "Independent_362_10": "Independent_362_10", "Independent_363_1": "Independent_363_1", "Independent_363_2": "Independent_363_2", "Independent_363_3": "Independent_363_3", "Independent_363_4": "Independent_363_4", "Independent_363_5": "Independent_363_5", "Independent_363_6": "Independent_363_6", "Independent_363_7": "Independent_363_7", "Independent_363_8": "Independent_363_8", "Independent_364_1": "Independent_364_1", "HUSP": "HUSP", "BHANVIP": "BHANVIP", "NDPF": "NDPF", "Independent_365_1": "Independent_365_1", "Independent_365_2": "Independent_365_2", "Independent_365_3": "Independent_365_3", "AIJCP": "AIJCP", "Independent_365_4": "Independent_365_4", "Independent_365_5": "Independent_365_5", "Independent_366_1": "Independent_366_1", "Independent_366_2": "Independent_366_2", "Independent_367_1": "Independent_367_1", "Independent_367_2": "Independent_367_2", "Independent_368_1": "Independent_368_1", "Independent_368_2": "Independent_368_2", "Independent_368_3": "Independent_368_3", "SAPP": "SAPP", "Independent_369_1": "Independent_369_1", "Independent_369_2": "Independent_369_2", "Independent_369_3": "Independent_369_3", "Independent_370_1": "Independent_370_1", "Independent_370_2": "Independent_370_2", "Independent_370_3": "Independent_370_3", "Independent_370_4": "Independent_370_4", "Independent_370_5": "Independent_370_5", "Independent_370_6": "Independent_370_6", "Independent_370_7": "Independent_370_7", "Independent_370_8": "Independent_370_8", "Independent_370_9": "Independent_370_9", "Independent_371_1": "Independent_371_1", "Independent_371_2": "Independent_371_2", "Independent_371_3": "Independent_371_3", "Independent_371_4": "Independent_371_4", "Independent_371_5": "Independent_371_5", "JRPA": "JRPA", "Independent_375_1": "Independent_375_1", "Independent_376_1": "Independent_376_1", "Independent_377_1": "Independent_377_1", "Independent_377_2": "Independent_377_2", "Independent_377_3": "Independent_377_3", "Independent_377_4": "Independent_377_4", "Independent_377_5": "Independent_377_5", "Independent_378_1": "Independent_378_1", "Independent_378_2": "Independent_378_2", "Independent_379_1": "Independent_379_1", "Independent_380_1": "Independent_380_1", "Independent_380_2": "Independent_380_2", "Independent_380_3": "Independent_380_3", "Independent_381_1": "Independent_381_1", "BSD": "BSD", "Independent_382_1": "Independent_382_1", "Independent_382_2": "Independent_382_2", "Independent_382_3": "Independent_382_3", "BMTP": "BMTP", "Independent_382_4": "Independent_382_4", "Independent_382_5": "Independent_382_5", "Independent_382_6": "Independent_382_6", "Independent_383_1": "Independent_383_1", "LEP": "LEP", "Independent_384_1": "Independent_384_1", "Independent_384_2": "Independent_384_2", "Independent_384_3": "Independent_384_3", "Independent_385_1": "Independent_385_1", "Independent_385_2": "Independent_385_2", "Independent_385_3": "Independent_385_3", "BSKD": "BSKD", "Independent_386_1": "Independent_386_1", "RVMP": "RVMP", "GEKP": "GEKP", "Independent_387_1": "Independent_387_1", "Independent_387_2": "Independent_387_2", "Independent_387_3": "Independent_387_3", "Independent_387_4": "Independent_387_4", "Independent_387_5": "Independent_387_5", "Independent_388_1": "Independent_388_1", "Independent_388_2": "Independent_388_2", "Independent_388_3": "Independent_388_3", "NJAP": "NJAP", "MAJP": "MAJP", "MAKM": "MAKM", "NLIP": "NLIP", "Independent_389_1": "Independent_389_1", "Independent_389_2": "Independent_389_2", "Independent_389_3": "Independent_389_3", "Independent_389_4": "Independent_389_4", "Independent_389_5": "Independent_389_5", "Independent_389_6": "Independent_389_6", "Independent_390_1": "Independent_390_1", "Independent_390_2": "Independent_390_2", "Independent_390_3": "Independent_390_3", "Independent_390_4": "Independent_390_4", "RTSJP": "RTSJP", "Independent_390_5": "Independent_390_5", "Independent_390_6": "Independent_390_6", "SSCP": "SSCP", "Independent_390_7": "Independent_390_7", "Independent_390_8": "Independent_390_8", "Independent_390_9": "Independent_390_9", "Independent_390_10": "Independent_390_10", "Independent_391_1": "Independent_391_1", "Independent_391_2": "Independent_391_2", "Independent_391_3": "Independent_391_3", "Independent_391_4": "Independent_391_4", "Independent_391_5": "Independent_391_5", "Independent_392_1": "Independent_392_1", "Independent_392_2": "Independent_392_2", "SHSAP": "SHSAP", "Independent_392_3": "Independent_392_3", "Independent_392_4": "Independent_392_4", "Independent_392_5": "Independent_392_5", "Independent_393_1": "Independent_393_1", "Independent_393_2": "Independent_393_2", "Independent_393_3": "Independent_393_3", "Independent_393_4": "Independent_393_4", "BRPI": "BRPI", "Independent_396_1": "Independent_396_1", "Independent_396_2": "Independent_396_2", "Independent_396_3": "Independent_396_3", "BCB": "BCB", "Independent_396_4": "Independent_396_4", "Independent_396_5": "Independent_396_5", "SURSAP": "SURSAP", "Independent_396_6": "Independent_396_6", "Independent_396_7": "Independent_396_7", "Independent_396_8": "Independent_396_8", "Independent_397_1": "Independent_397_1", "Independent_397_2": "Independent_397_2", "Independent_397_3": "Independent_397_3", "Independent_397_4": "Independent_397_4", "Independent_397_5": "Independent_397_5", "Independent_398_1": "Independent_398_1", "Independent_398_2": "Independent_398_2", "Independent_398_3": "Independent_398_3", "Independent_398_4": "Independent_398_4", "Independent_398_5": "Independent_398_5", "Independent_399_1": "Independent_399_1", "Independent_399_2": "Independent_399_2", "Independent_399_3": "Independent_399_3", "Independent_399_4": "Independent_399_4", "Independent_399_5": "Independent_399_5", "Independent_400_1": "Independent_400_1", "Independent_400_2": "Independent_400_2", "Independent_400_3": "Independent_400_3", "Independent_400_4": "Independent_400_4", "Independent_400_5": "Independent_400_5", "Independent_401_1": "Independent_401_1", "Independent_401_2": "Independent_401_2", "Independent_401_3": "Independent_401_3", "Independent_401_4": "Independent_401_4", "Independent_401_5": "Independent_401_5", "Independent_401_6": "Independent_401_6", "Independent_401_7": "Independent_401_7", "Independent_401_8": "Independent_401_8", "Independent_401_9": "Independent_401_9", "AMKP": "AMKP", "Independent_402_1": "Independent_402_1", "Independent_402_2": "Independent_402_2", "AIPF": "AIPF", "Independent_402_3": "Independent_402_3", "Independent_402_4": "Independent_402_4", "Independent_402_5": "Independent_402_5", "Independent_403_1": "Independent_403_1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 403, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 403, "registered_not_positive": 403}, "n_stations_flagged": 403, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:40:46.695647", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.604, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.56, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.488, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.069, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.124, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.488, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.287, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.287, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.619, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.568, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.568, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 403}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1e582aa5f434418890b799ad908f4eac", "name": "India 2016 local (overnight india_west_bengal_2016_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2016, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/West_Bengal/West_Bengal_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AITC": "AITC", "AIFB": "AIFB", "BJP": "BJP", "BSP": "BSP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "SUCI": "SUCI", "AMB": "AMB", "Independent_001_MEKLIGANJ_1": "Independent_001_MEKLIGANJ_1", "Independent_001_MEKLIGANJ_2": "Independent_001_MEKLIGANJ_2", "KPPU": "KPPU", "CPM": "CPM", "Independent_002_MATHABHANGA_1": "Independent_002_MATHABHANGA_1", "Independent_002_MATHABHANGA_2": "Independent_002_MATHABHANGA_2", "Independent_003_COOCH_BEHAR_UTTAR_1": "Independent_003_COOCH_BEHAR_UTTAR_1", "Independent_003_COOCH_BEHAR_UTTAR_2": "Independent_003_COOCH_BEHAR_UTTAR_2", "Independent_003_COOCH_BEHAR_UTTAR_3": "Independent_003_COOCH_BEHAR_UTTAR_3", "Independent_005_SITALKUCHI_1": "Independent_005_SITALKUCHI_1", "INC": "INC", "Independent_007_DINHATA_1": "Independent_007_DINHATA_1", "WPOI": "WPOI", "Independent_007_DINHATA_2": "Independent_007_DINHATA_2", "Independent_007_DINHATA_3": "Independent_007_DINHATA_3", "Independent_009_TUFANGANJ_1": "Independent_009_TUFANGANJ_1", "RSP": "RSP", "JMM": "JMM", "Independent_011_KALCHINI_1": "Independent_011_KALCHINI_1", "Independent_011_KALCHINI_2": "Independent_011_KALCHINI_2", "Independent_011_KALCHINI_3": "Independent_011_KALCHINI_3", "Independent_011_KALCHINI_4": "Independent_011_KALCHINI_4", "Independent_011_KALCHINI_5": "Independent_011_KALCHINI_5", "Independent_011_KALCHINI_6": "Independent_011_KALCHINI_6", "Independent_012_ALIPURDUARS_1": "Independent_012_ALIPURDUARS_1", "Independent_013_FALAKATA_1": "Independent_013_FALAKATA_1", "Independent_013_FALAKATA_2": "Independent_013_FALAKATA_2", "Independent_013_FALAKATA_3": "Independent_013_FALAKATA_3", "CPI_ML_L": "CPI_ML_L", "Independent_019_DABGRAM_PHULBARI_1": "Independent_019_DABGRAM_PHULBARI_1", "ABGL": "ABGL", "Independent_021_NAGRAKATA_1": "Independent_021_NAGRAKATA_1", "Independent_021_NAGRAKATA_2": "Independent_021_NAGRAKATA_2", "GOJAM": "GOJAM", "Independent_022_KALIMPONG_1": "Independent_022_KALIMPONG_1", "Independent_022_KALIMPONG_2": "Independent_022_KALIMPONG_2", "GRAC": "GRAC", "Independent_022_KALIMPONG_3": "Independent_022_KALIMPONG_3", "Independent_023_DARJEELING_1": "Independent_023_DARJEELING_1", "Independent_024_KURSEONG_1": "Independent_024_KURSEONG_1", "Independent_025_MATIGARA_NAXALBARI_1": "Independent_025_MATIGARA_NAXALBARI_1", "Independent_026_SILIGURI_1": "Independent_026_SILIGURI_1", "ABHM": "ABHM", "Independent_027_PHANSIDEWA_1": "Independent_027_PHANSIDEWA_1", "BMUP": "BMUP", "Independent_027_PHANSIDEWA_2": "Independent_027_PHANSIDEWA_2", "Independent_028_CHOPRA_1": "Independent_028_CHOPRA_1", "JDP": "JDP", "Independent_028_CHOPRA_2": "Independent_028_CHOPRA_2", "JD_U": "JD_U", "SP": "SP", "Independent_030_GOALPOKHAR_1": "Independent_030_GOALPOKHAR_1", "Independent_031_CHAKULIA_1": "Independent_031_CHAKULIA_1", "Independent_032_KARANDIGHI_1": "Independent_032_KARANDIGHI_1", "Independent_032_KARANDIGHI_2": "Independent_032_KARANDIGHI_2", "Independent_032_KARANDIGHI_3": "Independent_032_KARANDIGHI_3", "Independent_033_HEMTABAD_1": "Independent_033_HEMTABAD_1", "Independent_033_HEMTABAD_2": "Independent_033_HEMTABAD_2", "SWJP": "SWJP", "Independent_035_RAIGANJ_1": "Independent_035_RAIGANJ_1", "CPI": "CPI", "Independent_037_KUSHMANDI_1": "Independent_037_KUSHMANDI_1", "Independent_037_KUSHMANDI_2": "Independent_037_KUSHMANDI_2", "Independent_038_KUMARGANJ_1": "Independent_038_KUMARGANJ_1", "CPIM": "CPIM", "Independent_041_GANGARAMPUR_1": "Independent_041_GANGARAMPUR_1", "Independent_043_HABIBPUR_1": "Independent_043_HABIBPUR_1", "Independent_043_HABIBPUR_2": "Independent_043_HABIBPUR_2", "Independent_044_GAZOLE_1": "Independent_044_GAZOLE_1", "HKRD": "HKRD", "SDPI": "SDPI", "Independent_048_RATUA_1": "Independent_048_RATUA_1", "RPI_A": "RPI_A", "Independent_049_MANICKCHAK_1": "Independent_049_MANICKCHAK_1", "Independent_050_MALDAHA_1": "Independent_050_MALDAHA_1", "Independent_051_ENGLISHBAZAR_1": "Independent_051_ENGLISHBAZAR_1", "Independent_051_ENGLISHBAZAR_2": "Independent_051_ENGLISHBAZAR_2", "Independent_052_MOTHABARI_1": "Independent_052_MOTHABARI_1", "SHS": "SHS", "Independent_052_MOTHABARI_2": "Independent_052_MOTHABARI_2", "Independent_053_SUJAPUR_1": "Independent_053_SUJAPUR_1", "Independent_053_SUJAPUR_2": "Independent_053_SUJAPUR_2", "Independent_053_SUJAPUR_3": "Independent_053_SUJAPUR_3", "JESM": "JESM", "Independent_053_SUJAPUR_4": "Independent_053_SUJAPUR_4", "PDS": "PDS", "Independent_053_SUJAPUR_5": "Independent_053_SUJAPUR_5", "Independent_053_SUJAPUR_6": "Independent_053_SUJAPUR_6", "Independent_053_SUJAPUR_7": "Independent_053_SUJAPUR_7", "Independent_054_BAISHNAB_NAGAR_1": "Independent_054_BAISHNAB_NAGAR_1", "Independent_055_FARAKKA_1": "Independent_055_FARAKKA_1", "Independent_056_SAMSERGANJ_1": "Independent_056_SAMSERGANJ_1", "Independent_056_SAMSERGANJ_2": "Independent_056_SAMSERGANJ_2", "Independent_057_SUTI_1": "Independent_057_SUTI_1", "Independent_058_JANGIPUR_1": "Independent_058_JANGIPUR_1", "Independent_058_JANGIPUR_2": "Independent_058_JANGIPUR_2", "Independent_058_JANGIPUR_3": "Independent_058_JANGIPUR_3", "Independent_058_JANGIPUR_4": "Independent_058_JANGIPUR_4", "Independent_060_SAGARDIGHI_1": "Independent_060_SAGARDIGHI_1", "Independent_060_SAGARDIGHI_2": "Independent_060_SAGARDIGHI_2", "Independent_062_BHAGABANGOLA_1": "Independent_062_BHAGABANGOLA_1", "IUML": "IUML", "MPOI": "MPOI", "Independent_062_BHAGABANGOLA_2": "Independent_062_BHAGABANGOLA_2", "Independent_062_BHAGABANGOLA_3": "Independent_062_BHAGABANGOLA_3", "Independent_063_RANINAGAR_1": "Independent_063_RANINAGAR_1", "Independent_064_MURSHIDABAD_1": "Independent_064_MURSHIDABAD_1", "LJP": "LJP", "Independent_064_MURSHIDABAD_2": "Independent_064_MURSHIDABAD_2", "Independent_066_KHARGRAM_1": "Independent_066_KHARGRAM_1", "Independent_067_BURWAN_1": "Independent_067_BURWAN_1", "Independent_068_KANDI_1": "Independent_068_KANDI_1", "Independent_068_KANDI_2": "Independent_068_KANDI_2", "Independent_070_REJINAGAR_1": "Independent_070_REJINAGAR_1", "Independent_072_BAHARAMPUR_1": "Independent_072_BAHARAMPUR_1", "Independent_073_HARIHARPARA_1": "Independent_073_HARIHARPARA_1", "Independent_073_HARIHARPARA_2": "Independent_073_HARIHARPARA_2", "Independent_074_NAODA_1": "Independent_074_NAODA_1", "Independent_075_DOMKAL_1": "Independent_075_DOMKAL_1", "Independent_075_DOMKAL_2": "Independent_075_DOMKAL_2", "Independent_075_DOMKAL_3": "Independent_075_DOMKAL_3", "Independent_075_DOMKAL_4": "Independent_075_DOMKAL_4", "Independent_076_JALANGI_1": "Independent_076_JALANGI_1", "Independent_076_JALANGI_2": "Independent_076_JALANGI_2", "Independent_076_JALANGI_3": "Independent_076_JALANGI_3", "GMM": "GMM", "NDPOI": "NDPOI", "Independent_090_RANAGHAT_DAKSHIN_1": "Independent_090_RANAGHAT_DAKSHIN_1", "Independent_090_RANAGHAT_DAKSHIN_2": "Independent_090_RANAGHAT_DAKSHIN_2", "Independent_090_RANAGHAT_DAKSHIN_3": "Independent_090_RANAGHAT_DAKSHIN_3", "Independent_094_BAGDAH_1": "Independent_094_BAGDAH_1", "TRMRPPI": "TRMRPPI", "Independent_097_GAIGHATA_1": "Independent_097_GAIGHATA_1", "Independent_097_GAIGHATA_2": "Independent_097_GAIGHATA_2", "Independent_100_HABRA_1": "Independent_100_HABRA_1", "Independent_101_ASHOKNAGAR_1": "Independent_101_ASHOKNAGAR_1", "Independent_102_AMDANGA_1": "Independent_102_AMDANGA_1", "Independent_103_BIJPUR_1": "Independent_103_BIJPUR_1", "Independent_104_NAIHATI_1": "Independent_104_NAIHATI_1", "Independent_104_NAIHATI_2": "Independent_104_NAIHATI_2", "Independent_104_NAIHATI_3": "Independent_104_NAIHATI_3", "Independent_105_BHATPARA_1": "Independent_105_BHATPARA_1", "Independent_105_BHATPARA_2": "Independent_105_BHATPARA_2", "Independent_105_BHATPARA_3": "Independent_105_BHATPARA_3", "Independent_105_BHATPARA_4": "Independent_105_BHATPARA_4", "Independent_106_JAGATDAL_1": "Independent_106_JAGATDAL_1", "Independent_106_JAGATDAL_2": "Independent_106_JAGATDAL_2", "Independent_106_JAGATDAL_3": "Independent_106_JAGATDAL_3", "Independent_107_NOAPARA_1": "Independent_107_NOAPARA_1", "Independent_108_BARRACKPUR_1": "Independent_108_BARRACKPUR_1", "AAAP": "AAAP", "Independent_112_KAMARHATI_1": "Independent_112_KAMARHATI_1", "Independent_112_KAMARHATI_2": "Independent_112_KAMARHATI_2", "Independent_112_KAMARHATI_3": "Independent_112_KAMARHATI_3", "RAJSP": "RAJSP", "Independent_113_BARANAGAR_1": "Independent_113_BARANAGAR_1", "Independent_114_DUM_DUM_1": "Independent_114_DUM_DUM_1", "Independent_115_RAJARHAT_NEW_TOWN_1": "Independent_115_RAJARHAT_NEW_TOWN_1", "Independent_116_BIDHANNAGAR_1": "Independent_116_BIDHANNAGAR_1", "Independent_116_BIDHANNAGAR_2": "Independent_116_BIDHANNAGAR_2", "Independent_116_BIDHANNAGAR_3": "Independent_116_BIDHANNAGAR_3", "Independent_117_RAJARHAT_GOPALPUR_1": "Independent_117_RAJARHAT_GOPALPUR_1", "Independent_117_RAJARHAT_GOPALPUR_2": "Independent_117_RAJARHAT_GOPALPUR_2", "Independent_123_SANDESHKHALI_1": "Independent_123_SANDESHKHALI_1", "Independent_126_HINGALGANJ_1": "Independent_126_HINGALGANJ_1", "Independent_128_BASANTI_1": "Independent_128_BASANTI_1", "Independent_129_KULTALI_1": "Independent_129_KULTALI_1", "Independent_132_SAGAR_1": "Independent_132_SAGAR_1", "Independent_134_RAIDIGHI_1": "Independent_134_RAIDIGHI_1", "Independent_134_RAIDIGHI_2": "Independent_134_RAIDIGHI_2", "Independent_134_RAIDIGHI_3": "Independent_134_RAIDIGHI_3", "Independent_135_MANDIRBAZAR_1": "Independent_135_MANDIRBAZAR_1", "Independent_136_JAQYNAGAR_1": "Independent_136_JAQYNAGAR_1", "Independent_136_JAQYNAGAR_2": "Independent_136_JAQYNAGAR_2", "Independent_136_JAQYNAGAR_3": "Independent_136_JAQYNAGAR_3", "Independent_136_JAQYNAGAR_4": "Independent_136_JAQYNAGAR_4", "Independent_137_BARUIPUR_PURBA_1": "Independent_137_BARUIPUR_PURBA_1", "Independent_137_BARUIPUR_PURBA_2": "Independent_137_BARUIPUR_PURBA_2", "Independent_138_CANNING_PASCHIM_1": "Independent_138_CANNING_PASCHIM_1", "Independent_140_BARUIPUR_PASCHIM_1": "Independent_140_BARUIPUR_PASCHIM_1", "Independent_140_BARUIPUR_PASCHIM_2": "Independent_140_BARUIPUR_PASCHIM_2", "Independent_141_MAGRAHAT_PURBA_1": "Independent_141_MAGRAHAT_PURBA_1", "Independent_142_MAGRAHAT_PASCHIM_1": "Independent_142_MAGRAHAT_PASCHIM_1", "Independent_142_MAGRAHAT_PASCHIM_2": "Independent_142_MAGRAHAT_PASCHIM_2", "Independent_142_MAGRAHAT_PASCHIM_3": "Independent_142_MAGRAHAT_PASCHIM_3", "Independent_142_MAGRAHAT_PASCHIM_4": "Independent_142_MAGRAHAT_PASCHIM_4", "Independent_143_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_1": "Independent_143_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_1", "Independent_143_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_2": "Independent_143_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_2", "Independent_143_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_3": "Independent_143_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_3", "Independent_143_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_4": "Independent_143_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_4", "IUC": "IUC", "Independent_145_SATGACHIA_1": "Independent_145_SATGACHIA_1", "Independent_146_BISHNUPUR_SC_1": "Independent_146_BISHNUPUR_SC_1", "Independent_147_SONARPUR_DAKSHIN_1": "Independent_147_SONARPUR_DAKSHIN_1", "Independent_147_SONARPUR_DAKSHIN_2": "Independent_147_SONARPUR_DAKSHIN_2", "Independent_148_BHANGORE_1": "Independent_148_BHANGORE_1", "Independent_149_KASBA_1": "Independent_149_KASBA_1", "Independent_149_KASBA_2": "Independent_149_KASBA_2", "Independent_149_KASBA_3": "Independent_149_KASBA_3", "Independent_149_KASBA_4": "Independent_149_KASBA_4", "Independent_149_KASBA_5": "Independent_149_KASBA_5", "Independent_150_JADAVPUR_1": "Independent_150_JADAVPUR_1", "Independent_150_JADAVPUR_2": "Independent_150_JADAVPUR_2", "Independent_150_JADAVPUR_3": "Independent_150_JADAVPUR_3", "Independent_150_JADAVPUR_4": "Independent_150_JADAVPUR_4", "Independent_151_SONARPUR_UTTAR_1": "Independent_151_SONARPUR_UTTAR_1", "Independent_152_TOLLYGUNJ_1": "Independent_152_TOLLYGUNJ_1", "Independent_152_TOLLYGUNJ_2": "Independent_152_TOLLYGUNJ_2", "Independent_152_TOLLYGUNJ_3": "Independent_152_TOLLYGUNJ_3", "Independent_153_BEHALA_PURBA_1": "Independent_153_BEHALA_PURBA_1", "Independent_153_BEHALA_PURBA_2": "Independent_153_BEHALA_PURBA_2", "Independent_153_BEHALA_PURBA_3": "Independent_153_BEHALA_PURBA_3", "Independent_153_BEHALA_PURBA_4": "Independent_153_BEHALA_PURBA_4", "Independent_154_BEHALA_PASCHIM_1": "Independent_154_BEHALA_PASCHIM_1", "Independent_154_BEHALA_PASCHIM_2": "Independent_154_BEHALA_PASCHIM_2", "Independent_154_BEHALA_PASCHIM_3": "Independent_154_BEHALA_PASCHIM_3", "Independent_155_MAHESHTALA_1": "Independent_155_MAHESHTALA_1", "Independent_156_BUDGE_BUDGE_1": "Independent_156_BUDGE_BUDGE_1", "Independent_157_METIABURUZ_1": "Independent_157_METIABURUZ_1", "RLD": "RLD", "Independent_158_KOLKATA_PORT_1": "Independent_158_KOLKATA_PORT_1", "Independent_158_KOLKATA_PORT_2": "Independent_158_KOLKATA_PORT_2", "Independent_158_KOLKATA_PORT_3": "Independent_158_KOLKATA_PORT_3", "Independent_158_KOLKATA_PORT_4": "Independent_158_KOLKATA_PORT_4", "Independent_158_KOLKATA_PORT_5": "Independent_158_KOLKATA_PORT_5", "Independent_158_KOLKATA_PORT_6": "Independent_158_KOLKATA_PORT_6", "Independent_158_KOLKATA_PORT_7": "Independent_158_KOLKATA_PORT_7", "Independent_159_BHABANIPUR_1": "Independent_159_BHABANIPUR_1", "Independent_159_BHABANIPUR_2": "Independent_159_BHABANIPUR_2", "Independent_159_BHABANIPUR_3": "Independent_159_BHABANIPUR_3", "Independent_159_BHABANIPUR_4": "Independent_159_BHABANIPUR_4", "Independent_159_BHABANIPUR_5": "Independent_159_BHABANIPUR_5", "Independent_159_BHABANIPUR_6": "Independent_159_BHABANIPUR_6", "Independent_160_RASHBEHARI_1": "Independent_160_RASHBEHARI_1", "Independent_160_RASHBEHARI_2": "Independent_160_RASHBEHARI_2", "Independent_161_BALLYGUNGE_1": "Independent_161_BALLYGUNGE_1", "Independent_161_BALLYGUNGE_2": "Independent_161_BALLYGUNGE_2", "Independent_161_BALLYGUNGE_3": "Independent_161_BALLYGUNGE_3", "Independent_162_CHOWRANGEE_1": "Independent_162_CHOWRANGEE_1", "Independent_162_CHOWRANGEE_2": "Independent_162_CHOWRANGEE_2", "Independent_162_CHOWRANGEE_3": "Independent_162_CHOWRANGEE_3", "Independent_163_ENTALLY_1": "Independent_163_ENTALLY_1", "Independent_163_ENTALLY_2": "Independent_163_ENTALLY_2", "Independent_163_ENTALLY_3": "Independent_163_ENTALLY_3", "Independent_163_ENTALLY_4": "Independent_163_ENTALLY_4", "Independent_163_ENTALLY_5": "Independent_163_ENTALLY_5", "Independent_164_BELEGHATA_1": "Independent_164_BELEGHATA_1", "Independent_164_BELEGHATA_2": "Independent_164_BELEGHATA_2", "Independent_164_BELEGHATA_3": "Independent_164_BELEGHATA_3", "RJD": "RJD", "Independent_165_JORASANKO_1": "Independent_165_JORASANKO_1", "Independent_165_JORASANKO_2": "Independent_165_JORASANKO_2", "JD_S": "JD_S", "Independent_165_JORASANKO_3": "Independent_165_JORASANKO_3", "Independent_165_JORASANKO_4": "Independent_165_JORASANKO_4", "Independent_165_JORASANKO_5": "Independent_165_JORASANKO_5", "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_1": "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_1", "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_2": "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_2", "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_3": "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_3", "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_4": "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_4", "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_5": "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_5", "Independent_167_MANIKTALA_1": "Independent_167_MANIKTALA_1", "Independent_167_MANIKTALA_2": "Independent_167_MANIKTALA_2", "Independent_167_MANIKTALA_3": "Independent_167_MANIKTALA_3", "Independent_167_MANIKTALA_4": "Independent_167_MANIKTALA_4", "Independent_168_KASHIPUR_BELGACHIA_1": "Independent_168_KASHIPUR_BELGACHIA_1", "Independent_168_KASHIPUR_BELGACHIA_2": "Independent_168_KASHIPUR_BELGACHIA_2", "Independent_168_KASHIPUR_BELGACHIA_3": "Independent_168_KASHIPUR_BELGACHIA_3", "Independent_169_BALLY_1": "Independent_169_BALLY_1", "Independent_169_BALLY_2": "Independent_169_BALLY_2", "Independent_169_BALLY_3": "Independent_169_BALLY_3", "Independent_169_BALLY_4": "Independent_169_BALLY_4", "Independent_169_BALLY_5": "Independent_169_BALLY_5", "Independent_169_BALLY_6": "Independent_169_BALLY_6", "Independent_169_BALLY_7": "Independent_169_BALLY_7", "Independent_169_BALLY_8": "Independent_169_BALLY_8", "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_1": "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_1", "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_2": "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_2", "MHB": "MHB", "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_3": "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_3", "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_4": "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_4", "STPI": "STPI", "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_5": "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_5", "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_6": "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_6", "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_7": "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_7", "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_8": "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_8", "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_9": "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_9", "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_1": "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_1", "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_2": "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_2", "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_3": "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_3", "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_4": "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_4", "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_5": "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_5", "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_6": "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_6", "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_7": "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_7", "Independent_172_SHIBPUR_1": "Independent_172_SHIBPUR_1", "Independent_172_SHIBPUR_2": "Independent_172_SHIBPUR_2", "Independent_173_HOWRAH_DAKSHIN_1": "Independent_173_HOWRAH_DAKSHIN_1", "Independent_173_HOWRAH_DAKSHIN_2": "Independent_173_HOWRAH_DAKSHIN_2", "Independent_173_HOWRAH_DAKSHIN_3": "Independent_173_HOWRAH_DAKSHIN_3", "Independent_174_SANKRAIL_1": "Independent_174_SANKRAIL_1", "Independent_174_SANKRAIL_2": "Independent_174_SANKRAIL_2", "Independent_174_SANKRAIL_3": "Independent_174_SANKRAIL_3", "Independent_174_SANKRAIL_4": "Independent_174_SANKRAIL_4", "Independent_175_PANCHLA_1": "Independent_175_PANCHLA_1", "Independent_175_PANCHLA_2": "Independent_175_PANCHLA_2", "Independent_176_ULUBERIA_PURBA_1": "Independent_176_ULUBERIA_PURBA_1", "Independent_176_ULUBERIA_PURBA_2": "Independent_176_ULUBERIA_PURBA_2", "Independent_176_ULUBERIA_PURBA_3": "Independent_176_ULUBERIA_PURBA_3", "Independent_176_ULUBERIA_PURBA_4": "Independent_176_ULUBERIA_PURBA_4", "Independent_176_ULUBERIA_PURBA_5": "Independent_176_ULUBERIA_PURBA_5", "Independent_177_ULUBERIA_UTTAR_1": "Independent_177_ULUBERIA_UTTAR_1", "Independent_177_ULUBERIA_UTTAR_2": "Independent_177_ULUBERIA_UTTAR_2", "Independent_177_ULUBERIA_UTTAR_3": "Independent_177_ULUBERIA_UTTAR_3", "Independent_177_ULUBERIA_UTTAR_4": "Independent_177_ULUBERIA_UTTAR_4", "Independent_178_ULUBERIA_DAKSHIN_1": "Independent_178_ULUBERIA_DAKSHIN_1", "Independent_179_SHYAMPUR_1": "Independent_179_SHYAMPUR_1", "Independent_179_SHYAMPUR_2": "Independent_179_SHYAMPUR_2", "Independent_180_BAGNAN_1": "Independent_180_BAGNAN_1", "Independent_180_BAGNAN_2": "Independent_180_BAGNAN_2", "Independent_180_BAGNAN_3": "Independent_180_BAGNAN_3", "Independent_181_AMTA_1": "Independent_181_AMTA_1", "Independent_181_AMTA_2": "Independent_181_AMTA_2", "Independent_182_UDAYNARAYANPUR_1": "Independent_182_UDAYNARAYANPUR_1", "Independent_182_UDAYNARAYANPUR_2": "Independent_182_UDAYNARAYANPUR_2", "Independent_182_UDAYNARAYANPUR_3": "Independent_182_UDAYNARAYANPUR_3", "Independent_183_JAGATBALLAVPUR_1": "Independent_183_JAGATBALLAVPUR_1", "Independent_183_JAGATBALLAVPUR_2": "Independent_183_JAGATBALLAVPUR_2", "Independent_183_JAGATBALLAVPUR_3": "Independent_183_JAGATBALLAVPUR_3", "Independent_183_JAGATBALLAVPUR_4": "Independent_183_JAGATBALLAVPUR_4", "Independent_184_DOMJUR_1": "Independent_184_DOMJUR_1", "Independent_184_DOMJUR_2": "Independent_184_DOMJUR_2", "Independent_184_DOMJUR_3": "Independent_184_DOMJUR_3", "Independent_184_DOMJUR_4": "Independent_184_DOMJUR_4", "Independent_184_DOMJUR_5": "Independent_184_DOMJUR_5", "Independent_185_UTTARPARA_1": "Independent_185_UTTARPARA_1", "Independent_186_SREERAMPUR_1": "Independent_186_SREERAMPUR_1", "Independent_188_SINGUR_1": "Independent_188_SINGUR_1", "FDLP": "FDLP", "Independent_189_CHANDANNAGORE_1": "Independent_189_CHANDANNAGORE_1", "Independent_190_CHUNCHURA_1": "Independent_190_CHUNCHURA_1", "Independent_192_PANDUA_1": "Independent_192_PANDUA_1", "Independent_195_JANGIPARA_1": "Independent_195_JANGIPARA_1", "Independent_197_DHANEKHALI_1": "Independent_197_DHANEKHALI_1", "NCP": "NCP", "Independent_199_PURSURAH_1": "Independent_199_PURSURAH_1", "Independent_202_KHANAKUL_1": "Independent_202_KHANAKUL_1", "Independent_202_KHANAKUL_2": "Independent_202_KHANAKUL_2", "Independent_202_KHANAKUL_3": "Independent_202_KHANAKUL_3", "Independent_203_TAMLUK_1": "Independent_203_TAMLUK_1", "BHNP": "BHNP", "Independent_205_PANSKURA_PASCHIM_1": "Independent_205_PANSKURA_PASCHIM_1", "Independent_205_PANSKURA_PASCHIM_2": "Independent_205_PANSKURA_PASCHIM_2", "Independent_207_NANDAKUMAR_1": "Independent_207_NANDAKUMAR_1", "Independent_207_NANDAKUMAR_2": "Independent_207_NANDAKUMAR_2", "Independent_208_MAHISADAL_1": "Independent_208_MAHISADAL_1", "Independent_208_MAHISADAL_2": "Independent_208_MAHISADAL_2", "Independent_211_CHANDIPUR_1": "Independent_211_CHANDIPUR_1", "Independent_212_PATASHPUR_1": "Independent_212_PATASHPUR_1", "Independent_214_BHAGABANPUR_1": "Independent_214_BHAGABANPUR_1", "Independent_215_KHEJURI_1": "Independent_215_KHEJURI_1", "Independent_217_RAMNAGAR_1": "Independent_217_RAMNAGAR_1", "DSP_P": "DSP_P", "Independent_220_NAYAGRAM_1": "Independent_220_NAYAGRAM_1", "Independent_220_NAYAGRAM_2": "Independent_220_NAYAGRAM_2", "Independent_221_GOPIBALLAVPUR_1": "Independent_221_GOPIBALLAVPUR_1", "AJSUP": "AJSUP", "JKP_N": "JKP_N", "Independent_222_JHARGRAM_1": "Independent_222_JHARGRAM_1", "Independent_223_KESHIARY_1": "Independent_223_KESHIARY_1", "Independent_223_KESHIARY_2": "Independent_223_KESHIARY_2", "Independent_224_KHARAGPUR_SADAR_1": "Independent_224_KHARAGPUR_SADAR_1", "Independent_227_PINGLA_1": "Independent_227_PINGLA_1", "Independent_228_KHARAGPUR_1": "Independent_228_KHARAGPUR_1", "Independent_231_GHATAL_1": "Independent_231_GHATAL_1", "Independent_234_SALBONI_1": "Independent_234_SALBONI_1", "Independent_238_BANDWAN_1": "Independent_238_BANDWAN_1", "Independent_238_BANDWAN_2": "Independent_238_BANDWAN_2", "AKBJHP": "AKBJHP", "Independent_239_BALARAMPUR_1": "Independent_239_BALARAMPUR_1", "Independent_239_BALARAMPUR_2": "Independent_239_BALARAMPUR_2", "Independent_240_BAGHMUNDI_1": "Independent_240_BAGHMUNDI_1", "Independent_241_JOYPUR_1": "Independent_241_JOYPUR_1", "Independent_242_PURULIA_1": "Independent_242_PURULIA_1", "Independent_242_PURULIA_2": "Independent_242_PURULIA_2", "Independent_242_PURULIA_3": "Independent_242_PURULIA_3", "Independent_242_PURULIA_4": "Independent_242_PURULIA_4", "Independent_242_PURULIA_5": "Independent_242_PURULIA_5", "Independent_245_PARA_1": "Independent_245_PARA_1", "Independent_247_SALTORA_1": "Independent_247_SALTORA_1", "Independent_248_CHHATNA_1": "Independent_248_CHHATNA_1", "JHAP": "JHAP", "Independent_250_RAIPUR_1": "Independent_250_RAIPUR_1", "Independent_251_TALDANGRA_1": "Independent_251_TALDANGRA_1", "Independent_253_BARJORA_1": "Independent_253_BARJORA_1", "Independent_254_ONDA_1": "Independent_254_ONDA_1", "Independent_257_INDUS_1": "Independent_257_INDUS_1", "Independent_260_BARDHAMAN_DAKSHIN_1": "Independent_260_BARDHAMAN_DAKSHIN_1", "Independent_262_JAMALPUR_1": "Independent_262_JAMALPUR_1", "CPI_Marxist": "CPI_Marxist", "Independent_265_MEMARI_1": "Independent_265_MEMARI_1", "Independent_267_BHATAR_1": "Independent_267_BHATAR_1", "Independent_268_PURBASTHALI_DAKSHIN_1": "Independent_268_PURBASTHALI_DAKSHIN_1", "Independent_268_PURBASTHALI_DAKSHIN_2": "Independent_268_PURBASTHALI_DAKSHIN_2", "SP_I": "SP_I", "Independent_273_AUSGRAM_1": "Independent_273_AUSGRAM_1", "Independent_275_PANDABESWAR_1": "Independent_275_PANDABESWAR_1", "Independent_276_DURGAPUR_PURBA_1": "Independent_276_DURGAPUR_PURBA_1", "Independent_276_DURGAPUR_PURBA_2": "Independent_276_DURGAPUR_PURBA_2", "Independent_277_DURGAPUR_PASCHIM_1": "Independent_277_DURGAPUR_PASCHIM_1", "Independent_279_JAMURIA_1": "Independent_279_JAMURIA_1", "Independent_282_KULTI_1": "Independent_282_KULTI_1", "Independent_284_DUBRAJPUR_1": "Independent_284_DUBRAJPUR_1", "Independent_285_SURI_1": "Independent_285_SURI_1", "Independent_286_BOLPUR_1": "Independent_286_BOLPUR_1", "Independent_287_NANOOR_1": "Independent_287_NANOOR_1", "Independent_289_SAINTHIA_1": "Independent_289_SAINTHIA_1", "Independent_290_MAYURESWAR_1": "Independent_290_MAYURESWAR_1", "Independent_291_RAMPURHAT_1": "Independent_291_RAMPURHAT_1", "RCPI_R": "RCPI_R", "Independent_293_NALHATI_1": "Independent_293_NALHATI_1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 294, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 294, "registered_not_positive": 294}, "n_stations_flagged": 294, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:40:33.326976", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.604, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.56, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.524, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.406, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.069, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.314, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.323, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.524, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.406, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.406, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.311, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.311, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.628, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.616, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 294}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ca252e0c952747b2a076fae044664e0c", "name": "India 2019 local (overnight india-maharashtra-2019-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2019, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Maharashtra/Maharashtra_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"INC": "INC", "SHS": "SHS", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "NOTA": "NOTA", "AAAP": "AAAP", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "BTP": "BTP", "BJP": "BJP", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "CPIM": "CPIM", "VBA": "VBA", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "BSP": "BSP", "SWP": "SWP", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "Independent_4_4": "Independent_4_4", "PPID": "PPID", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "Independent_5_2": "Independent_5_2", "Independent_5_3": "Independent_5_3", "Independent_5_4": "Independent_5_4", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "AIMIM": "AIMIM", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "LKSGM": "LKSGM", "Independent_7_2": "Independent_7_2", "Independent_7_3": "Independent_7_3", "SP": "SP", "MNS": "MNS", "Independent_7_4": "Independent_7_4", "NCP": "NCP", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "CPI": "CPI", "MEP": "MEP", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "Independent_10_3": "Independent_10_3", "Independent_10_4": "Independent_10_4", "Independent_10_5": "Independent_10_5", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "Independent_11_3": "Independent_11_3", "Independent_11_4": "Independent_11_4", "Independent_11_5": "Independent_11_5", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "Independent_12_3": "Independent_12_3", "Independent_12_4": "Independent_12_4", "IUML": "IUML", "BMUP": "BMUP", "Independent_12_5": "Independent_12_5", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "MAHKRS": "MAHKRS", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "Independent_13_3": "Independent_13_3", "Independent_13_4": "Independent_13_4", "Independent_13_5": "Independent_13_5", "Independent_13_6": "Independent_13_6", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "Independent_14_3": "Independent_14_3", "Independent_14_4": "Independent_14_4", "PWPI": "PWPI", "Independent_14_5": "Independent_14_5", "Independent_14_6": "Independent_14_6", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_15_2": "Independent_15_2", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_16_2": "Independent_16_2", "Independent_16_3": "Independent_16_3", "Independent_16_4": "Independent_16_4", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "Independent_17_3": "Independent_17_3", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "BAHUMP": "BAHUMP", "RaJPa": "RaJPa", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "Independent_19_3": "Independent_19_3", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_20_2": "Independent_20_2", "Independent_20_3": "Independent_20_3", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_21_2": "Independent_21_2", "Independent_21_3": "Independent_21_3", "Independent_21_4": "Independent_21_4", "Independent_21_5": "Independent_21_5", "Independent_21_6": "Independent_21_6", "Independent_21_7": "Independent_21_7", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_22_2": "Independent_22_2", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_23_2": "Independent_23_2", "Independent_23_3": "Independent_23_3", "Independent_23_4": "Independent_23_4", "Independent_23_5": "Independent_23_5", "Independent_23_6": "Independent_23_6", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "Independent_24_2": "Independent_24_2", "Independent_24_3": "Independent_24_3", "Independent_24_4": "Independent_24_4", "Independent_24_5": "Independent_24_5", "Independent_24_6": "Independent_24_6", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "TPSTP": "TPSTP", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "Independent_26_3": "Independent_26_3", "Independent_26_4": "Independent_26_4", "Independent_26_5": "Independent_26_5", "Independent_26_6": "Independent_26_6", "Independent_26_7": "Independent_26_7", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "PHJSP": "PHJSP", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "MPS(T)": "MPS(T)", "Independent_28_4": "Independent_28_4", "VMP": "VMP", "Independent_28_5": "Independent_28_5", "Independent_28_6": "Independent_28_6", "Independent_28_7": "Independent_28_7", "Independent_28_8": "Independent_28_8", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "Independent_29_4": "Independent_29_4", "Independent_29_5": "Independent_29_5", "Independent_29_6": "Independent_29_6", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "RSSDP": "RSSDP", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "SBBGP": "SBBGP", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "RPIS": "RPIS", "Independent_31_2": "Independent_31_2", "Independent_31_3": "Independent_31_3", "Independent_31_4": "Independent_31_4", "Independent_31_5": "Independent_31_5", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "BVA": "BVA", "Independent_32_3": "Independent_32_3", "Independent_32_4": "Independent_32_4", "Independent_32_5": "Independent_32_5", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "Independent_33_4": "Independent_33_4", "Independent_33_5": "Independent_33_5", "Independent_33_6": "Independent_33_6", "Independent_33_7": "Independent_33_7", "Independent_33_8": "Independent_33_8", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_34_3": "Independent_34_3", "Independent_34_4": "Independent_34_4", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "Independent_35_2": "Independent_35_2", "Independent_35_3": "Independent_35_3", "RUC": "RUC", "RPIR": "RPIR", "VINPA": "VINPA", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_36_3": "Independent_36_3", "Independent_36_4": "Independent_36_4", "Independent_36_5": "Independent_36_5", "ABHM": "ABHM", "Independent_36_6": "Independent_36_6", "Independent_36_7": "Independent_36_7", "JANADIP": "JANADIP", "Independent_36_8": "Independent_36_8", "Independent_36_9": "Independent_36_9", "RP(K)": "RP(K)", "Independent_36_10": "Independent_36_10", "Independent_36_11": "Independent_36_11", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "Independent_37_3": "Independent_37_3", "Independent_37_4": "Independent_37_4", "Independent_37_5": "Independent_37_5", "Independent_37_6": "Independent_37_6", "KiSP": "KiSP", "Independent_37_7": "Independent_37_7", "Independent_37_8": "Independent_37_8", "Independent_37_9": "Independent_37_9", "GGP": "GGP", "Independent_37_10": "Independent_37_10", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_38_3": "Independent_38_3", "Independent_38_4": "Independent_38_4", "Independent_38_5": "Independent_38_5", "Independent_38_6": "Independent_38_6", "Independent_38_7": "Independent_38_7", "Independent_38_8": "Independent_38_8", "Independent_38_9": "Independent_38_9", "RJanPty": "RJanPty", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_39_2": "Independent_39_2", "Independent_39_3": "Independent_39_3", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "RPI": "RPI", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_40_3": "Independent_40_3", "ARP": "ARP", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "Independent_41_3": "Independent_41_3", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_42_2": "Independent_42_2", "Independent_42_3": "Independent_42_3", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_43_2": "Independent_43_2", "Independent_43_3": "Independent_43_3", "Independent_43_4": "Independent_43_4", "PSPU": "PSPU", "Independent_43_5": "Independent_43_5", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "Independent_44_3": "Independent_44_3", "Independent_44_4": "Independent_44_4", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_45_2": "Independent_45_2", "Independent_45_3": "Independent_45_3", "SVPP": "SVPP", "Independent_45_4": "Independent_45_4", "Independent_45_5": "Independent_45_5", "Independent_45_6": "Independent_45_6", "Independent_45_7": "Independent_45_7", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "Independent_46_3": "Independent_46_3", "Independent_46_4": "Independent_46_4", "Independent_46_5": "Independent_46_5", "Independent_46_6": "Independent_46_6", "Independent_46_7": "Independent_46_7", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "Independent_47_3": "Independent_47_3", "Independent_47_4": "Independent_47_4", "Independent_47_5": "Independent_47_5", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_48_2": "Independent_48_2", "STBP": "STBP", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_50_3": "Independent_50_3", "Independent_50_4": "Independent_50_4", "Independent_50_5": "Independent_50_5", "Independent_50_6": "Independent_50_6", "SUCI(C)": "SUCI(C)", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "APoI": "APoI", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "RJBP": "RJBP", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "Independent_52_3": "Independent_52_3", "RPI(KH)": "RPI(KH)", "MHBHVCAG": "MHBHVCAG", "Independent_52_4": "Independent_52_4", "Independent_52_5": "Independent_52_5", "BARESP": "BARESP", "Independent_52_6": "Independent_52_6", "Independent_52_7": "Independent_52_7", "BALP": "BALP", "Independent_52_8": "Independent_52_8", "RKBP": "RKBP", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "Independent_53_2": "Independent_53_2", "Independent_53_3": "Independent_53_3", "Independent_53_4": "Independent_53_4", "Independent_53_5": "Independent_53_5", "Independent_53_6": "Independent_53_6", "PHSP": "PHSP", "DJHP": "DJHP", "HBP": "HBP", "BMFP": "BMFP", "CSM": "CSM", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_54_3": "Independent_54_3", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "MNDP": "MNDP", "Independent_55_2": "Independent_55_2", "Independent_55_3": "Independent_55_3", "Independent_55_4": "Independent_55_4", "Independent_55_5": "Independent_55_5", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_56_2": "Independent_56_2", "Independent_56_3": "Independent_56_3", "Independent_56_4": "Independent_56_4", "Independent_56_5": "Independent_56_5", "Independent_56_6": "Independent_56_6", "Independent_56_7": "Independent_56_7", "Independent_56_8": "Independent_56_8", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_57_2": "Independent_57_2", "Independent_57_3": "Independent_57_3", "Independent_57_4": "Independent_57_4", "Independent_57_5": "Independent_57_5", "Independent_58_1": "Independent_58_1", "Independent_58_2": "Independent_58_2", "Independent_58_3": "Independent_58_3", "Independent_58_4": "Independent_58_4", "Independent_58_5": "Independent_58_5", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_59_2": "Independent_59_2", "Independent_59_3": "Independent_59_3", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "Independent_60_3": "Independent_60_3", "Independent_60_4": "Independent_60_4", "Independent_60_5": "Independent_60_5", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "Independent_61_3": "Independent_61_3", "Independent_61_4": "Independent_61_4", "Independent_61_5": "Independent_61_5", "Independent_61_6": "Independent_61_6", "Independent_61_7": "Independent_61_7", "HJP": "HJP", "Independent_61_8": "Independent_61_8", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_62_3": "Independent_62_3", "Independent_62_4": "Independent_62_4", "Independent_62_5": "Independent_62_5", "JMBP": "JMBP", "Independent_62_6": "Independent_62_6", "Independent_62_7": "Independent_62_7", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "Independent_63_3": "Independent_63_3", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_64_2": "Independent_64_2", "Independent_64_3": "Independent_64_3", "Independent_64_4": "Independent_64_4", "Independent_64_5": "Independent_64_5", "Independent_64_6": "Independent_64_6", "Independent_64_7": "Independent_64_7", "Independent_64_8": "Independent_64_8", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_65_2": "Independent_65_2", "Independent_65_3": "Independent_65_3", "Independent_65_4": "Independent_65_4", "Independent_65_5": "Independent_65_5", "Independent_65_6": "Independent_65_6", "Independent_65_7": "Independent_65_7", "Independent_65_8": "Independent_65_8", "Independent_65_9": "Independent_65_9", "Independent_65_10": "Independent_65_10", "Independent_65_11": "Independent_65_11", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_66_2": "Independent_66_2", "Independent_66_3": "Independent_66_3", "Independent_66_4": "Independent_66_4", "Independent_67_1": "Independent_67_1", "Independent_67_2": "Independent_67_2", "Independent_67_3": "Independent_67_3", "VRA": "VRA", "Independent_67_4": "Independent_67_4", "Independent_67_5": "Independent_67_5", "Independent_67_6": "Independent_67_6", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "Independent_68_3": "Independent_68_3", "Independent_68_4": "Independent_68_4", "Independent_68_5": "Independent_68_5", "Independent_68_6": "Independent_68_6", "Independent_68_7": "Independent_68_7", "Independent_68_8": "Independent_68_8", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_69_3": "Independent_69_3", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "Independent_70_2": "Independent_70_2", "Independent_70_3": "Independent_70_3", "Independent_70_4": "Independent_70_4", "Independent_70_5": "Independent_70_5", "Independent_71_1": "Independent_71_1", "Independent_71_2": "Independent_71_2", "Independent_71_3": "Independent_71_3", "Independent_71_4": "Independent_71_4", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_72_2": "Independent_72_2", "Independent_72_3": "Independent_72_3", "Independent_72_4": "Independent_72_4", "Independent_72_5": "Independent_72_5", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "Independent_73_3": "Independent_73_3", "Independent_73_4": "Independent_73_4", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_74_2": "Independent_74_2", "Independent_74_3": "Independent_74_3", "Independent_74_4": "Independent_74_4", "ABMP": "ABMP", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_75_2": "Independent_75_2", "Independent_75_3": "Independent_75_3", "Independent_75_4": "Independent_75_4", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_76_3": "Independent_76_3", "Independent_76_4": "Independent_76_4", "Independent_76_5": "Independent_76_5", "Independent_76_6": "Independent_76_6", "Independent_76_7": "Independent_76_7", "Independent_76_8": "Independent_76_8", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_77_2": "Independent_77_2", "Independent_77_3": "Independent_77_3", "SaRaPa": "SaRaPa", "Independent_77_4": "Independent_77_4", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_78_2": "Independent_78_2", "Independent_78_3": "Independent_78_3", "Independent_78_4": "Independent_78_4", "Independent_79_1": "Independent_79_1", "Independent_79_2": "Independent_79_2", "Independent_79_3": "Independent_79_3", "Independent_79_4": "Independent_79_4", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_80_2": "Independent_80_2", "Independent_80_3": "Independent_80_3", "Independent_80_4": "Independent_80_4", "Independent_80_5": "Independent_80_5", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "PRCP": "PRCP", "DONP": "DONP", "Independent_82_1": "Independent_82_1", "Independent_82_2": "Independent_82_2", "Independent_82_3": "Independent_82_3", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_83_2": "Independent_83_2", "Independent_83_3": "Independent_83_3", "Independent_83_4": "Independent_83_4", "JJJKP": "JJJKP", "Independent_83_5": "Independent_83_5", "Independent_84_1": "Independent_84_1", "Independent_84_2": "Independent_84_2", "Independent_84_3": "Independent_84_3", "Independent_84_4": "Independent_84_4", "Independent_84_5": "Independent_84_5", "Independent_84_6": "Independent_84_6", "Independent_84_7": "Independent_84_7", "Independent_84_8": "Independent_84_8", "Independent_84_9": "Independent_84_9", "RBS": "RBS", "Independent_85_1": "Independent_85_1", "Independent_85_2": "Independent_85_2", "Independent_86_1": "Independent_86_1", "Independent_86_2": "Independent_86_2", "Independent_86_3": "Independent_86_3", "Independent_86_4": "Independent_86_4", "Independent_86_5": "Independent_86_5", "Independent_86_6": "Independent_86_6", "Independent_86_7": "Independent_86_7", "Independent_86_8": "Independent_86_8", "Independent_86_9": "Independent_86_9", "Independent_86_10": "Independent_86_10", "RASMARP": "RASMARP", "ANC": "ANC", "Independent_86_11": "Independent_86_11", "Independent_87_1": "Independent_87_1", "Independent_87_2": "Independent_87_2", "Independent_87_3": "Independent_87_3", "Independent_87_4": "Independent_87_4", "Independent_87_5": "Independent_87_5", "Independent_87_6": "Independent_87_6", "Independent_87_7": "Independent_87_7", "Independent_87_8": "Independent_87_8", "Independent_87_9": "Independent_87_9", "Independent_87_10": "Independent_87_10", "Independent_87_11": "Independent_87_11", "Independent_87_12": "Independent_87_12", "Independent_87_13": "Independent_87_13", "Independent_87_14": "Independent_87_14", "Independent_87_15": "Independent_87_15", "Independent_87_16": "Independent_87_16", "Independent_87_17": "Independent_87_17", "Independent_87_18": "Independent_87_18", "Independent_87_19": "Independent_87_19", "Independent_87_20": "Independent_87_20", "Independent_87_21": "Independent_87_21", "Independent_87_22": "Independent_87_22", "Independent_87_23": "Independent_87_23", "Independent_87_24": "Independent_87_24", "Independent_87_25": "Independent_87_25", "Independent_87_26": "Independent_87_26", "Independent_87_27": "Independent_87_27", "Independent_87_28": "Independent_87_28", "Independent_87_29": "Independent_87_29", "Independent_88_1": "Independent_88_1", "Independent_88_2": "Independent_88_2", "JD(S)": "JD(S)", "Independent_88_3": "Independent_88_3", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_89_2": "Independent_89_2", "NSPU": "NSPU", "Independent_89_3": "Independent_89_3", "Independent_89_4": "Independent_89_4", "Independent_89_5": "Independent_89_5", "BHAPRAP": "BHAPRAP", "Independent_90_1": "Independent_90_1", "Independent_90_2": "Independent_90_2", "Independent_90_3": "Independent_90_3", "Independent_90_4": "Independent_90_4", "Independent_92_1": "Independent_92_1", "Independent_92_2": "Independent_92_2", "Independent_92_3": "Independent_92_3", "Independent_92_4": "Independent_92_4", "Independent_92_5": "Independent_92_5", "Independent_92_6": "Independent_92_6", "Independent_93_1": "Independent_93_1", "Independent_93_2": "Independent_93_2", "Independent_94_1": "Independent_94_1", "Independent_94_2": "Independent_94_2", "BHJSRP": "BHJSRP", "Independent_94_3": "Independent_94_3", "Independent_94_4": "Independent_94_4", "Independent_94_5": "Independent_94_5", "Independent_95_1": "Independent_95_1", "Independent_95_2": "Independent_95_2", "Independent_95_3": "Independent_95_3", "Independent_95_4": "Independent_95_4", "Independent_95_5": "Independent_95_5", "Independent_96_1": "Independent_96_1", "Independent_96_2": "Independent_96_2", "Independent_96_3": "Independent_96_3", "Independent_96_4": "Independent_96_4", "Independent_96_5": "Independent_96_5", "Independent_96_6": "Independent_96_6", "Independent_96_7": "Independent_96_7", "RSPS": "RSPS", "Independent_97_1": "Independent_97_1", "Independent_97_2": "Independent_97_2", "Independent_97_3": "Independent_97_3", "Independent_97_4": "Independent_97_4", "Independent_97_5": "Independent_97_5", "Independent_97_6": "Independent_97_6", "Independent_97_7": "Independent_97_7", "Independent_98_1": "Independent_98_1", "Independent_98_2": "Independent_98_2", "Independent_98_3": "Independent_98_3", "Independent_98_4": "Independent_98_4", "Independent_99_1": "Independent_99_1", "Independent_99_2": "Independent_99_2", "Independent_99_3": "Independent_99_3", "Independent_99_4": "Independent_99_4", "Independent_99_5": "Independent_99_5", "Independent_99_6": "Independent_99_6", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_100_2": "Independent_100_2", "Independent_100_3": "Independent_100_3", "Independent_100_4": "Independent_100_4", "Independent_100_5": "Independent_100_5", "Independent_100_6": "Independent_100_6", "Independent_100_7": "Independent_100_7", "Independent_101_1": "Independent_101_1", "Independent_101_2": "Independent_101_2", "Independent_101_3": "Independent_101_3", "Independent_101_4": "Independent_101_4", "Independent_101_5": "Independent_101_5", "Independent_101_6": "Independent_101_6", "Independent_101_7": "Independent_101_7", "Independent_101_8": "Independent_101_8", "Independent_101_9": "Independent_101_9", "POUI": "POUI", "Independent_101_10": "Independent_101_10", "Independent_101_11": "Independent_101_11", "Independent_101_12": "Independent_101_12", "Independent_101_13": "Independent_101_13", "Independent_101_14": "Independent_101_14", "Independent_101_15": "Independent_101_15", "Independent_101_16": "Independent_101_16", "Independent_101_17": "Independent_101_17", "Independent_101_18": "Independent_101_18", "Independent_101_19": "Independent_101_19", "Independent_101_20": "Independent_101_20", "Independent_101_21": "Independent_101_21", "Independent_101_22": "Independent_101_22", "Independent_102_1": "Independent_102_1", "Independent_102_2": "Independent_102_2", "Independent_102_3": "Independent_102_3", "Independent_102_4": "Independent_102_4", "Independent_102_5": "Independent_102_5", "Independent_102_6": "Independent_102_6", "Independent_102_7": "Independent_102_7", "Independent_102_8": "Independent_102_8", "Independent_102_9": "Independent_102_9", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_104_1": "Independent_104_1", "Independent_104_2": "Independent_104_2", "Independent_104_3": "Independent_104_3", "Independent_105_1": "Independent_105_1", "Independent_105_2": "Independent_105_2", "Independent_105_3": "Independent_105_3", "Independent_105_4": "Independent_105_4", "Independent_106_1": "Independent_106_1", "Independent_106_2": "Independent_106_2", "Independent_106_3": "Independent_106_3", "Independent_106_4": "Independent_106_4", "Independent_106_5": "Independent_106_5", "PRBP": "PRBP", "Independent_106_6": "Independent_106_6", "Independent_107_1": "Independent_107_1", "Independent_107_2": "Independent_107_2", "Independent_107_3": "Independent_107_3", "Independent_107_4": "Independent_107_4", "Independent_107_5": "Independent_107_5", "Independent_107_6": "Independent_107_6", "Independent_108_1": "Independent_108_1", "Independent_108_2": "Independent_108_2", "Independent_108_3": "Independent_108_3", "Independent_108_4": "Independent_108_4", "Independent_108_5": "Independent_108_5", "Independent_108_6": "Independent_108_6", "MBT": "MBT", "Independent_109_1": "Independent_109_1", "Independent_109_2": "Independent_109_2", "Independent_109_3": "Independent_109_3", "Independent_109_4": "Independent_109_4", "Independent_109_5": "Independent_109_5", "Independent_109_6": "Independent_109_6", "Independent_109_7": "Independent_109_7", "Independent_109_8": "Independent_109_8", "Independent_109_9": "Independent_109_9", "Independent_109_10": "Independent_109_10", "Independent_109_11": "Independent_109_11", "Independent_109_12": "Independent_109_12", "Independent_109_13": "Independent_109_13", "Independent_109_14": "Independent_109_14", "Independent_109_15": "Independent_109_15", "Independent_109_16": "Independent_109_16", "Independent_109_17": "Independent_109_17", "Independent_109_18": "Independent_109_18", "Independent_109_19": "Independent_109_19", "Independent_109_20": "Independent_109_20", "Independent_109_21": "Independent_109_21", "Independent_109_22": "Independent_109_22", "Independent_109_23": "Independent_109_23", "Independent_109_24": "Independent_109_24", "Independent_110_1": "Independent_110_1", "Independent_110_2": "Independent_110_2", "Independent_110_3": "Independent_110_3", "Independent_110_4": "Independent_110_4", "SMFB": "SMFB", "Independent_110_5": "Independent_110_5", "Independent_110_6": "Independent_110_6", "Independent_110_7": "Independent_110_7", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "Independent_111_2": "Independent_111_2", "Independent_111_3": "Independent_111_3", "Independent_111_4": "Independent_111_4", "Independent_111_5": "Independent_111_5", "Independent_111_6": "Independent_111_6", "Independent_111_7": "Independent_111_7", "Independent_112_1": "Independent_112_1", "Independent_112_2": "Independent_112_2", "Independent_112_3": "Independent_112_3", "Independent_112_4": "Independent_112_4", "Independent_112_5": "Independent_112_5", "Independent_112_6": "Independent_112_6", "Independent_112_7": "Independent_112_7", "Independent_112_8": "Independent_112_8", "Independent_112_9": "Independent_112_9", "Independent_113_1": "Independent_113_1", "Independent_113_2": "Independent_113_2", "Independent_113_3": "Independent_113_3", "Independent_113_4": "Independent_113_4", "Independent_113_5": "Independent_113_5", "Independent_113_6": "Independent_113_6", "Independent_113_7": "Independent_113_7", "Independent_113_8": "Independent_113_8", "Independent_113_9": "Independent_113_9", "Independent_113_10": "Independent_113_10", "Independent_114_1": "Independent_114_1", "Independent_114_2": "Independent_114_2", "Independent_114_3": "Independent_114_3", "Independent_114_4": "Independent_114_4", "Independent_114_5": "Independent_114_5", "Independent_114_6": "Independent_114_6", "Independent_114_7": "Independent_114_7", "Independent_114_8": "Independent_114_8", "Independent_114_9": "Independent_114_9", "Independent_114_10": "Independent_114_10", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_115_2": "Independent_115_2", "Independent_115_3": "Independent_115_3", "Independent_115_4": "Independent_115_4", "Independent_115_5": "Independent_115_5", "Independent_115_6": "Independent_115_6", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "Independent_116_2": "Independent_116_2", "Independent_116_3": "Independent_116_3", "Independent_117_1": "Independent_117_1", "Independent_118_1": "Independent_118_1", "Independent_118_2": "Independent_118_2", "Independent_118_3": "Independent_118_3", "Independent_118_4": "Independent_118_4", "Independent_119_1": "Independent_119_1", "Independent_119_2": "Independent_119_2", "Independent_119_3": "Independent_119_3", "Independent_120_1": "Independent_120_1", "Independent_120_2": "Independent_120_2", "Independent_120_3": "Independent_120_3", "Independent_121_1": "Independent_121_1", "Independent_123_1": "Independent_123_1", "Independent_123_2": "Independent_123_2", "Independent_123_3": "Independent_123_3", "Independent_123_4": "Independent_123_4", "Independent_123_5": "Independent_123_5", "Independent_123_6": "Independent_123_6", "Independent_123_7": "Independent_123_7", "Independent_124_1": "Independent_124_1", "Independent_124_2": "Independent_124_2", "Independent_124_3": "Independent_124_3", "Independent_124_4": "Independent_124_4", "Independent_125_1": "Independent_125_1", "Independent_125_2": "Independent_125_2", "Independent_125_3": "Independent_125_3", "Independent_125_4": "Independent_125_4", "Independent_125_5": "Independent_125_5", "Independent_125_6": "Independent_125_6", "Independent_125_7": "Independent_125_7", "Independent_125_8": "Independent_125_8", "Independent_125_9": "Independent_125_9", "Independent_125_10": "Independent_125_10", "Independent_125_11": "Independent_125_11", "Independent_126_1": "Independent_126_1", "Independent_126_2": "Independent_126_2", "Independent_126_3": "Independent_126_3", "Independent_126_4": "Independent_126_4", "Independent_127_1": "Independent_127_1", "Independent_127_2": "Independent_127_2", "Independent_127_3": "Independent_127_3", "Independent_127_4": "Independent_127_4", "Independent_128_1": "Independent_128_1", "Independent_128_2": "Independent_128_2", "RMPOI": "RMPOI", "Independent_129_1": "Independent_129_1", "MLPOIRF": "MLPOIRF", "Independent_129_2": "Independent_129_2", "Independent_131_1": "Independent_131_1", "SanS": "SanS", "Independent_132_1": "Independent_132_1", "Independent_132_2": "Independent_132_2", "Independent_132_3": "Independent_132_3", "Independent_132_4": "Independent_132_4", "Independent_132_5": "Independent_132_5", "Independent_132_6": "Independent_132_6", "Independent_132_7": "Independent_132_7", "Independent_133_1": "Independent_133_1", "Independent_134_1": "Independent_134_1", "Independent_135_1": "Independent_135_1", "Independent_136_1": "Independent_136_1", "Independent_136_2": "Independent_136_2", "PECP": "PECP", "Independent_137_1": "Independent_137_1", "Independent_137_2": "Independent_137_2", "Independent_137_3": "Independent_137_3", "Independent_137_4": "Independent_137_4", "Independent_137_5": "Independent_137_5", "Independent_138_1": "Independent_138_1", "Independent_138_2": "Independent_138_2", "Independent_138_3": "Independent_138_3", "Independent_138_4": "Independent_138_4", "Independent_138_5": "Independent_138_5", "Independent_138_6": "Independent_138_6", "Independent_138_7": "Independent_138_7", "Independent_138_8": "Independent_138_8", "Independent_138_9": "Independent_138_9", "Independent_139_1": "Independent_139_1", "Independent_140_1": "Independent_140_1", "Independent_140_2": "Independent_140_2", "Independent_140_3": "Independent_140_3", "Independent_140_4": "Independent_140_4", "Independent_140_5": "Independent_140_5", "Independent_140_6": "Independent_140_6", "Independent_140_7": "Independent_140_7", "Independent_140_8": "Independent_140_8", "Independent_141_1": "Independent_141_1", "Independent_141_2": "Independent_141_2", "Independent_141_3": "Independent_141_3", "Independent_141_4": "Independent_141_4", "Independent_141_5": "Independent_141_5", "Independent_141_6": "Independent_141_6", "Independent_141_7": "Independent_141_7", "Independent_141_8": "Independent_141_8", "Independent_141_9": "Independent_141_9", "Independent_141_10": "Independent_141_10", "Independent_141_11": "Independent_141_11", "Independent_141_12": "Independent_141_12", "Independent_142_1": "Independent_142_1", "Independent_142_2": "Independent_142_2", "Independent_142_3": "Independent_142_3", "Independent_142_4": "Independent_142_4", "Independent_142_5": "Independent_142_5", "Independent_142_6": "Independent_142_6", "Independent_142_7": "Independent_142_7", "Independent_142_8": "Independent_142_8", "Independent_142_9": "Independent_142_9", "Independent_142_10": "Independent_142_10", "Independent_142_11": "Independent_142_11", "Independent_143_1": "Independent_143_1", "Independent_144_1": "Independent_144_1", "Independent_144_2": "Independent_144_2", "Independent_144_3": "Independent_144_3", "AIFB": "AIFB", "Independent_144_4": "Independent_144_4", "Independent_144_5": "Independent_144_5", "Independent_145_1": "Independent_145_1", "Independent_145_2": "Independent_145_2", "NAP": "NAP", "Independent_145_3": "Independent_145_3", "Independent_145_4": "Independent_145_4", "SBSP": "SBSP", "Independent_146_1": "Independent_146_1", "Independent_146_2": "Independent_146_2", "Independent_146_3": "Independent_146_3", "Independent_146_4": "Independent_146_4", "JP": "JP", "RMGP": "RMGP", "Independent_147_1": "Independent_147_1", "Independent_147_2": "Independent_147_2", "Independent_148_1": "Independent_148_1", "Independent_149_1": "Independent_149_1", "Independent_149_2": "Independent_149_2", "Independent_149_3": "Independent_149_3", "Independent_149_4": "Independent_149_4", "Independent_149_5": "Independent_149_5", "Independent_150_1": "Independent_150_1", "INNP": "INNP", "Independent_150_2": "Independent_150_2", "Independent_150_3": "Independent_150_3", "Independent_151_1": "Independent_151_1", "Independent_151_2": "Independent_151_2", "Independent_151_3": "Independent_151_3", "Independent_151_4": "Independent_151_4", "Independent_151_5": "Independent_151_5", "JUVJANP": "JUVJANP", "Independent_151_6": "Independent_151_6", "Independent_151_7": "Independent_151_7", "Independent_151_8": "Independent_151_8", "Independent_151_9": "Independent_151_9", "RRP": "RRP", "NJANP": "NJANP", "Independent_153_1": "Independent_153_1", "Independent_154_1": "Independent_154_1", "Independent_154_2": "Independent_154_2", "Independent_154_3": "Independent_154_3", "Independent_155_1": "Independent_155_1", "Independent_155_2": "Independent_155_2", "Independent_155_3": "Independent_155_3", "Independent_155_4": "Independent_155_4", "Independent_155_5": "Independent_155_5", "Independent_155_6": "Independent_155_6", "Independent_156_1": "Independent_156_1", "PRBHPRP": "PRBHPRP", "Independent_157_1": "Independent_157_1", "Independent_158_1": "Independent_158_1", "Independent_158_2": "Independent_158_2", "Independent_159_1": "Independent_159_1", "Independent_159_2": "Independent_159_2", "AAPP": "AAPP", "Independent_161_1": "Independent_161_1", "Independent_162_1": "Independent_162_1", "Independent_162_2": "Independent_162_2", "Independent_162_3": "Independent_162_3", "Independent_162_4": "Independent_162_4", "Independent_163_1": "Independent_163_1", "Independent_163_2": "Independent_163_2", "Independent_163_3": "Independent_163_3", "Independent_164_1": "Independent_164_1", "Independent_164_2": "Independent_164_2", "Independent_164_3": "Independent_164_3", "JAC": "JAC", "Independent_165_1": "Independent_165_1", "Independent_165_2": "Independent_165_2", "Independent_166_1": "Independent_166_1", "Independent_166_2": "Independent_166_2", "Independent_166_3": "Independent_166_3", "Independent_167_1": "Independent_167_1", "Independent_168_1": "Independent_168_1", "LD": "LD", "Independent_168_2": "Independent_168_2", "Independent_168_3": "Independent_168_3", "UnCP": "UnCP", "Independent_168_4": "Independent_168_4", "Independent_168_5": "Independent_168_5", "Independent_168_6": "Independent_168_6", "Independent_168_7": "Independent_168_7", "Independent_169_1": "Independent_169_1", "Independent_169_2": "Independent_169_2", "Independent_169_3": "Independent_169_3", "Independent_169_4": "Independent_169_4", "Independent_169_5": "Independent_169_5", "Independent_169_6": "Independent_169_6", "Independent_169_7": "Independent_169_7", "Independent_170_1": "Independent_170_1", "Independent_170_2": "Independent_170_2", "Independent_170_3": "Independent_170_3", "Independent_171_1": "Independent_171_1", "Independent_171_2": "Independent_171_2", "Independent_171_3": "Independent_171_3", "Independent_171_4": "Independent_171_4", "Independent_172_1": "Independent_172_1", "Independent_172_2": "Independent_172_2", "Independent_172_3": "Independent_172_3", "ABHS": "ABHS", "Independent_172_4": "Independent_172_4", "Independent_172_5": "Independent_172_5", "Independent_172_6": "Independent_172_6", "Independent_172_7": "Independent_172_7", "Independent_173_1": "Independent_173_1", "Independent_173_2": "Independent_173_2", "Independent_173_3": "Independent_173_3", "Independent_175_1": "Independent_175_1", "Independent_175_2": "Independent_175_2", "Independent_175_3": "Independent_175_3", "BHABHAPA": "BHABHAPA", "Independent_176_1": "Independent_176_1", "Independent_176_2": "Independent_176_2", "Independent_176_3": "Independent_176_3", "Independent_178_1": "Independent_178_1", "Independent_178_2": "Independent_178_2", "Independent_178_3": "Independent_178_3", "Independent_178_4": "Independent_178_4", "Independent_180_1": "Independent_180_1", "AIMF": "AIMF", "Independent_180_2": "Independent_180_2", "Independent_181_1": "Independent_181_1", "Independent_182_1": "Independent_182_1", "Independent_182_2": "Independent_182_2", "Independent_182_3": "Independent_182_3", "Independent_182_4": "Independent_182_4", "Independent_182_5": "Independent_182_5", "BMSM": "BMSM", "Independent_182_6": "Independent_182_6", "Independent_182_7": "Independent_182_7", "Independent_184_1": "Independent_184_1", "Independent_184_2": "Independent_184_2", "Independent_184_3": "Independent_184_3", "AimPP": "AimPP", "Independent_185_1": "Independent_185_1", "Independent_185_2": "Independent_185_2", "NYP": "NYP", "Independent_185_3": "Independent_185_3", "Independent_186_1": "Independent_186_1", "Independent_187_1": "Independent_187_1", "KKJHS": "KKJHS", "Independent_187_2": "Independent_187_2", "Independent_188_1": "Independent_188_1", "Independent_188_2": "Independent_188_2", "Independent_188_3": "Independent_188_3", "Independent_188_4": "Independent_188_4", "Independent_189_1": "Independent_189_1", "Independent_189_2": "Independent_189_2", "Independent_189_3": "Independent_189_3", "JALOP": "JALOP", "Independent_190_1": "Independent_190_1", "Independent_190_2": "Independent_190_2", "Independent_190_3": "Independent_190_3", "Independent_191_1": "Independent_191_1", "Independent_191_2": "Independent_191_2", "Independent_191_3": "Independent_191_3", "Independent_191_4": "Independent_191_4", "Independent_191_5": "Independent_191_5", "Independent_191_6": "Independent_191_6", "Independent_191_7": "Independent_191_7", "Independent_192_1": "Independent_192_1", "Independent_192_2": "Independent_192_2", "Independent_192_3": "Independent_192_3", "Independent_192_4": "Independent_192_4", "Independent_192_5": "Independent_192_5", "LB": "LB", "Independent_192_6": "Independent_192_6", "Independent_193_1": "Independent_193_1", "Independent_193_2": "Independent_193_2", "Independent_193_3": "Independent_193_3", "Independent_193_4": "Independent_193_4", "Independent_193_5": "Independent_193_5", "Independent_193_6": "Independent_193_6", "Independent_193_7": "Independent_193_7", "Independent_193_8": "Independent_193_8", "Independent_194_1": "Independent_194_1", "Independent_194_2": "Independent_194_2", "Independent_194_3": "Independent_194_3", "Independent_195_1": "Independent_195_1", "Independent_195_2": "Independent_195_2", "Independent_195_3": "Independent_195_3", "Independent_195_4": "Independent_195_4", "Independent_195_5": "Independent_195_5", "Independent_195_6": "Independent_195_6", "Independent_195_7": "Independent_195_7", "Independent_196_1": "Independent_196_1", "RTORP": "RTORP", "bns": "bns", "Independent_197_1": "Independent_197_1", "Independent_197_2": "Independent_197_2", "Independent_197_3": "Independent_197_3", "HAPa": "HAPa", "Independent_198_1": "Independent_198_1", "Independent_198_2": "Independent_198_2", "Independent_198_3": "Independent_198_3", "Independent_199_1": "Independent_199_1", "Independent_199_2": "Independent_199_2", "Independent_199_3": "Independent_199_3", "Independent_199_4": "Independent_199_4", "Independent_199_5": "Independent_199_5", "Independent_199_6": "Independent_199_6", "Independent_199_7": "Independent_199_7", "Independent_200_1": "Independent_200_1", "Independent_200_2": "Independent_200_2", "Independent_200_3": "Independent_200_3", "Independent_200_4": "Independent_200_4", "Independent_200_5": "Independent_200_5", "Independent_200_6": "Independent_200_6", "Independent_200_7": "Independent_200_7", "Independent_200_8": "Independent_200_8", "Independent_200_9": "Independent_200_9", "Independent_200_10": "Independent_200_10", "Independent_201_1": "Independent_201_1", "Independent_201_2": "Independent_201_2", "Independent_201_3": "Independent_201_3", "Independent_201_4": "Independent_201_4", "Independent_201_5": "Independent_201_5", "Independent_202_1": "Independent_202_1", "Independent_202_2": "Independent_202_2", "Independent_202_3": "Independent_202_3", "Independent_202_4": "Independent_202_4", "Independent_202_5": "Independent_202_5", "Independent_203_1": "Independent_203_1", "Independent_203_2": "Independent_203_2", "Independent_204_1": "Independent_204_1", "Independent_204_2": "Independent_204_2", "Independent_204_3": "Independent_204_3", "Independent_205_1": "Independent_205_1", "Independent_205_2": "Independent_205_2", "BhaRP": "BhaRP", "Independent_205_3": "Independent_205_3", "Independent_205_4": "Independent_205_4", "Independent_205_5": "Independent_205_5", "Independent_206_1": "Independent_206_1", "Independent_206_2": "Independent_206_2", "Independent_206_3": "Independent_206_3", "Independent_206_4": "Independent_206_4", "Independent_206_5": "Independent_206_5", "Independent_206_6": "Independent_206_6", "Independent_206_7": "Independent_206_7", "Independent_206_8": "Independent_206_8", "Independent_206_9": "Independent_206_9", "Independent_206_10": "Independent_206_10", "BDNP": "BDNP", "Independent_206_11": "Independent_206_11", "Independent_206_12": "Independent_206_12", "Independent_207_1": "Independent_207_1", "Independent_207_2": "Independent_207_2", "Independent_207_3": "Independent_207_3", "Independent_207_4": "Independent_207_4", "Independent_207_5": "Independent_207_5", "Independent_207_6": "Independent_207_6", "Independent_208_1": "Independent_208_1", "Independent_208_2": "Independent_208_2", "Independent_208_3": "Independent_208_3", "Independent_209_1": "Independent_209_1", "Independent_209_2": "Independent_209_2", "Independent_209_3": "Independent_209_3", "Independent_209_4": "Independent_209_4", "Independent_209_5": "Independent_209_5", "Independent_209_6": "Independent_209_6", "Independent_210_1": "Independent_210_1", "Independent_210_2": "Independent_210_2", "pbpa": "pbpa", "Independent_210_3": "Independent_210_3", "Independent_210_4": "Independent_210_4", "Independent_210_5": "Independent_210_5", "Independent_211_1": "Independent_211_1", "Independent_211_2": "Independent_211_2", "Independent_212_1": "Independent_212_1", "Independent_212_2": "Independent_212_2", "Independent_212_3": "Independent_212_3", "Independent_212_4": "Independent_212_4", "Independent_212_5": "Independent_212_5", "Independent_213_1": "Independent_213_1", "Independent_213_2": "Independent_213_2", "Independent_213_3": "Independent_213_3", "Independent_213_4": "Independent_213_4", "Independent_213_5": "Independent_213_5", "Independent_213_6": "Independent_213_6", "Independent_213_7": "Independent_213_7", "Independent_214_1": "Independent_214_1", "Independent_214_2": "Independent_214_2", "Independent_214_3": "Independent_214_3", "Independent_214_4": "Independent_214_4", "Independent_214_5": "Independent_214_5", "Independent_214_6": "Independent_214_6", "Independent_214_7": "Independent_214_7", "Independent_214_8": "Independent_214_8", "Independent_214_9": "Independent_214_9", "Independent_214_10": "Independent_214_10", "Independent_214_11": "Independent_214_11", "Independent_214_12": "Independent_214_12", "Independent_214_13": "Independent_214_13", "Independent_214_14": "Independent_214_14", "Independent_214_15": "Independent_214_15", "Independent_214_16": "Independent_214_16", "Independent_214_17": "Independent_214_17", "Independent_215_1": "Independent_215_1", "Independent_215_2": "Independent_215_2", "Independent_215_3": "Independent_215_3", "Independent_215_4": "Independent_215_4", "Independent_215_5": "Independent_215_5", "Independent_215_6": "Independent_215_6", "Independent_216_1": "Independent_216_1", "Independent_217_1": "Independent_217_1", "Independent_217_2": "Independent_217_2", "Independent_217_3": "Independent_217_3", "Independent_218_1": "Independent_218_1", "Independent_219_1": "Independent_219_1", "Independent_219_2": "Independent_219_2", "Independent_219_3": "Independent_219_3", "Independent_219_4": "Independent_219_4", "Independent_219_5": "Independent_219_5", "Independent_219_6": "Independent_219_6", "Independent_219_7": "Independent_219_7", "Independent_219_8": "Independent_219_8", "Independent_219_9": "Independent_219_9", "Independent_220_1": "Independent_220_1", "Independent_220_2": "Independent_220_2", "Independent_220_3": "Independent_220_3", "Independent_220_4": "Independent_220_4", "KTSTP": "KTSTP", "Independent_221_1": "Independent_221_1", "Independent_221_2": "Independent_221_2", "Independent_221_3": "Independent_221_3", "Independent_221_4": "Independent_221_4", "Independent_221_5": "Independent_221_5", "Independent_221_6": "Independent_221_6", "Independent_221_7": "Independent_221_7", "Independent_221_8": "Independent_221_8", "Independent_221_9": "Independent_221_9", "Independent_221_10": "Independent_221_10", "Independent_222_1": "Independent_222_1", "Independent_222_2": "Independent_222_2", "Independent_222_3": "Independent_222_3", "Independent_222_4": "Independent_222_4", "Independent_223_1": "Independent_223_1", "Independent_223_2": "Independent_223_2", "Independent_223_3": "Independent_223_3", "Independent_223_4": "Independent_223_4", "Independent_223_5": "Independent_223_5", "Independent_224_1": "Independent_224_1", "Independent_225_1": "Independent_225_1", "Independent_225_2": "Independent_225_2", "Independent_225_3": "Independent_225_3", "Independent_225_4": "Independent_225_4", "Independent_225_5": "Independent_225_5", "Independent_226_1": "Independent_226_1", "Independent_226_2": "Independent_226_2", "Independent_226_3": "Independent_226_3", "Independent_226_4": "Independent_226_4", "Independent_227_1": "Independent_227_1", "Independent_227_2": "Independent_227_2", "Independent_227_3": "Independent_227_3", "Independent_227_4": "Independent_227_4", "Independent_227_5": "Independent_227_5", "Independent_227_6": "Independent_227_6", "Independent_228_1": "Independent_228_1", "Independent_228_2": "Independent_228_2", "Independent_228_3": "Independent_228_3", "Independent_228_4": "Independent_228_4", "Independent_228_5": "Independent_228_5", "Independent_228_6": "Independent_228_6", "Independent_228_7": "Independent_228_7", "Independent_228_8": "Independent_228_8", "Independent_228_9": "Independent_228_9", "Independent_228_10": "Independent_228_10", "Independent_228_11": "Independent_228_11", "Independent_229_1": "Independent_229_1", "Independent_229_2": "Independent_229_2", "Independent_229_3": "Independent_229_3", "Independent_229_4": "Independent_229_4", "Independent_229_5": "Independent_229_5", "Independent_229_6": "Independent_229_6", "Independent_229_7": "Independent_229_7", "Independent_229_8": "Independent_229_8", "BHYS": "BHYS", "Independent_229_9": "Independent_229_9", "Independent_229_10": "Independent_229_10", "Independent_229_11": "Independent_229_11", "Independent_229_12": "Independent_229_12", "Independent_229_13": "Independent_229_13", "Independent_229_14": "Independent_229_14", "Independent_229_15": "Independent_229_15", "Independent_229_16": "Independent_229_16", "Independent_230_1": "Independent_230_1", "Independent_230_2": "Independent_230_2", "Independent_230_3": "Independent_230_3", "Independent_230_4": "Independent_230_4", "Independent_230_5": "Independent_230_5", "Independent_230_6": "Independent_230_6", "Independent_230_7": "Independent_230_7", "Independent_230_8": "Independent_230_8", "Independent_230_9": "Independent_230_9", "Independent_230_10": "Independent_230_10", "Independent_230_11": "Independent_230_11", "Independent_230_12": "Independent_230_12", "Independent_230_13": "Independent_230_13", "Independent_230_14": "Independent_230_14", "Independent_230_15": "Independent_230_15", "Independent_230_16": "Independent_230_16", "Independent_230_17": "Independent_230_17", "Independent_230_18": "Independent_230_18", "Independent_230_19": "Independent_230_19", "Independent_230_20": "Independent_230_20", "LJD": "LJD", "Independent_231_1": "Independent_231_1", "Independent_231_2": "Independent_231_2", "LKSNP": "LKSNP", "Independent_232_1": "Independent_232_1", "Independent_232_2": "Independent_232_2", "Independent_232_3": "Independent_232_3", "Independent_232_4": "Independent_232_4", "Independent_232_5": "Independent_232_5", "Independent_232_6": "Independent_232_6", "Independent_233_1": "Independent_233_1", "Independent_233_2": "Independent_233_2", "Independent_233_3": "Independent_233_3", "Independent_233_4": "Independent_233_4", "Independent_233_5": "Independent_233_5", "Independent_233_6": "Independent_233_6", "Independent_233_7": "Independent_233_7", "Independent_233_8": "Independent_233_8", "Independent_233_9": "Independent_233_9", "Independent_233_10": "Independent_233_10", "Independent_234_1": "Independent_234_1", "Independent_234_2": "Independent_234_2", "Independent_234_3": "Independent_234_3", "Independent_234_4": "Independent_234_4", "LJGP": "LJGP", "Independent_234_5": "Independent_234_5", "Independent_234_6": "Independent_234_6", "Independent_235_1": "Independent_235_1", "Independent_235_2": "Independent_235_2", "Independent_235_3": "Independent_235_3", "Independent_235_4": "Independent_235_4", "Independent_235_5": "Independent_235_5", "Independent_235_6": "Independent_235_6", "Independent_235_7": "Independent_235_7", "Independent_235_8": "Independent_235_8", "Independent_235_9": "Independent_235_9", "Independent_235_10": "Independent_235_10", "Independent_235_11": "Independent_235_11", "Independent_236_1": "Independent_236_1", "Independent_236_2": "Independent_236_2", "Independent_236_3": "Independent_236_3", "Independent_237_1": "Independent_237_1", "Independent_237_2": "Independent_237_2", "Independent_237_3": "Independent_237_3", "Independent_237_4": "Independent_237_4", "Independent_237_5": "Independent_237_5", "Independent_237_6": "Independent_237_6", "Independent_238_1": "Independent_238_1", "Independent_238_2": "Independent_238_2", "Independent_238_3": "Independent_238_3", "Independent_238_4": "Independent_238_4", "Independent_239_1": "Independent_239_1", "Independent_239_2": "Independent_239_2", "Independent_239_3": "Independent_239_3", "Independent_239_4": "Independent_239_4", "Independent_239_5": "Independent_239_5", "Independent_239_6": "Independent_239_6", "Independent_239_7": "Independent_239_7", "Independent_239_8": "Independent_239_8", "Independent_239_9": "Independent_239_9", "Independent_240_1": "Independent_240_1", "Independent_240_2": "Independent_240_2", "Independent_240_3": "Independent_240_3", "Independent_240_4": "Independent_240_4", "Independent_241_1": "Independent_241_1", "Independent_241_2": "Independent_241_2", "Independent_241_3": "Independent_241_3", "ABEP": "ABEP", "Independent_241_4": "Independent_241_4", "Independent_241_5": "Independent_241_5", "Independent_241_6": "Independent_241_6", "Independent_241_7": "Independent_241_7", "Independent_241_8": "Independent_241_8", "Independent_241_9": "Independent_241_9", "Independent_242_1": "Independent_242_1", "Independent_242_2": "Independent_242_2", "Independent_242_3": "Independent_242_3", "Independent_243_1": "Independent_243_1", "Independent_243_2": "Independent_243_2", "Independent_243_3": "Independent_243_3", "Independent_243_4": "Independent_243_4", "Independent_244_1": "Independent_244_1", "Independent_244_2": "Independent_244_2", "Independent_244_3": "Independent_244_3", "Independent_244_4": "Independent_244_4", "Independent_245_1": "Independent_245_1", "Independent_245_2": "Independent_245_2", "Independent_245_3": "Independent_245_3", "Independent_245_4": "Independent_245_4", "Independent_245_5": "Independent_245_5", "Independent_246_1": "Independent_246_1", "Independent_246_2": "Independent_246_2", "Independent_246_3": "Independent_246_3", "Independent_246_4": "Independent_246_4", "Independent_246_5": "Independent_246_5", "Independent_246_6": "Independent_246_6", "Independent_246_7": "Independent_246_7", "Independent_246_8": "Independent_246_8", "Independent_246_9": "Independent_246_9", "Independent_247_1": "Independent_247_1", "Independent_247_2": "Independent_247_2", "Independent_247_3": "Independent_247_3", "Independent_247_4": "Independent_247_4", "Independent_247_5": "Independent_247_5", "Independent_247_6": "Independent_247_6", "Independent_247_7": "Independent_247_7", "Independent_248_1": "Independent_248_1", "Independent_248_2": "Independent_248_2", "Independent_248_3": "Independent_248_3", "Independent_248_4": "Independent_248_4", "Independent_248_5": "Independent_248_5", "Independent_248_6": "Independent_248_6", "Independent_248_7": "Independent_248_7", "Independent_249_1": "Independent_249_1", "Independent_249_2": "Independent_249_2", "Independent_249_3": "Independent_249_3", "Independent_249_4": "Independent_249_4", "Independent_249_5": "Independent_249_5", "Independent_249_6": "Independent_249_6", "Independent_249_7": "Independent_249_7", "Independent_249_8": "Independent_249_8", "Independent_249_9": "Independent_249_9", "Independent_249_10": "Independent_249_10", "Independent_249_11": "Independent_249_11", "Independent_250_1": "Independent_250_1", "Independent_250_2": "Independent_250_2", "Independent_250_3": "Independent_250_3", "Independent_250_4": "Independent_250_4", "Independent_251_1": "Independent_251_1", "Independent_251_2": "Independent_251_2", "Independent_251_3": "Independent_251_3", "Independent_251_4": "Independent_251_4", "Independent_251_5": "Independent_251_5", "Independent_251_6": "Independent_251_6", "Independent_251_7": "Independent_251_7", "Independent_251_8": "Independent_251_8", "Independent_252_1": "Independent_252_1", "Independent_252_2": "Independent_252_2", "Independent_252_3": "Independent_252_3", "Independent_252_4": "Independent_252_4", "Independent_252_5": "Independent_252_5", "Independent_252_6": "Independent_252_6", "Independent_252_7": "Independent_252_7", "Independent_252_8": "Independent_252_8", "Independent_252_9": "Independent_252_9", "Independent_252_10": "Independent_252_10", "Independent_252_11": "Independent_252_11", "Independent_252_12": "Independent_252_12", "Independent_252_13": "Independent_252_13", "Independent_253_1": "Independent_253_1", "Independent_253_2": "Independent_253_2", "Independent_253_3": "Independent_253_3", "Independent_253_4": "Independent_253_4", "NRSP": "NRSP", "Independent_253_5": "Independent_253_5", "Independent_253_6": "Independent_253_6", "Independent_253_7": "Independent_253_7", "Independent_253_8": "Independent_253_8", "Independent_253_9": "Independent_253_9", "Independent_253_10": "Independent_253_10", "Independent_253_11": "Independent_253_11", "Independent_253_12": "Independent_253_12", "BPSJP": "BPSJP", "Independent_254_1": "Independent_254_1", "Independent_254_2": "Independent_254_2", "Independent_254_3": "Independent_254_3", "Independent_255_1": "Independent_255_1", "Independent_255_2": "Independent_255_2", "Independent_255_3": "Independent_255_3", "Independent_255_4": "Independent_255_4", "Independent_255_5": "Independent_255_5", "Independent_255_6": "Independent_255_6", "Independent_256_1": "Independent_256_1", "Independent_256_2": "Independent_256_2", "Independent_256_3": "Independent_256_3", "Independent_257_1": "Independent_257_1", "Independent_257_2": "Independent_257_2", "Independent_257_3": "Independent_257_3", "Independent_258_1": "Independent_258_1", "Independent_258_2": "Independent_258_2", "Independent_258_3": "Independent_258_3", "Independent_258_4": "Independent_258_4", "Independent_259_1": "Independent_259_1", "Independent_259_2": "Independent_259_2", "Independent_260_1": "Independent_260_1", "Independent_260_2": "Independent_260_2", "Independent_260_3": "Independent_260_3", "Independent_260_4": "Independent_260_4", "Independent_260_5": "Independent_260_5", "Independent_260_6": "Independent_260_6", "Independent_260_7": "Independent_260_7", "Independent_261_1": "Independent_261_1", "Independent_261_2": "Independent_261_2", "Independent_261_3": "Independent_261_3", "SERSNMH": "SERSNMH", "Independent_262_1": "Independent_262_1", "Independent_262_2": "Independent_262_2", "Independent_262_3": "Independent_262_3", "Independent_263_1": "Independent_263_1", "Independent_263_2": "Independent_263_2", "Independent_263_3": "Independent_263_3", "Independent_263_4": "Independent_263_4", "Independent_263_5": "Independent_263_5", "Independent_263_6": "Independent_263_6", "Independent_263_7": "Independent_263_7", "Independent_266_1": "Independent_266_1", "Independent_267_1": "Independent_267_1", "Independent_267_2": "Independent_267_2", "Independent_269_1": "Independent_269_1", "Independent_269_2": "Independent_269_2", "Independent_269_3": "Independent_269_3", "Independent_270_1": "Independent_270_1", "Independent_270_2": "Independent_270_2", "Independent_271_1": "Independent_271_1", "JSS": "JSS", "Independent_271_2": "Independent_271_2", "Independent_271_3": "Independent_271_3", "Independent_271_4": "Independent_271_4", "Independent_271_5": "Independent_271_5", "Independent_271_6": "Independent_271_6", "Independent_271_7": "Independent_271_7", "Independent_271_8": "Independent_271_8", "Independent_271_9": "Independent_271_9", "Independent_272_1": "Independent_272_1", "Independent_272_2": "Independent_272_2", "Independent_272_3": "Independent_272_3", "Independent_272_4": "Independent_272_4", "Independent_272_5": "Independent_272_5", "Independent_272_6": "Independent_272_6", "Independent_272_7": "Independent_272_7", "Independent_273_1": "Independent_273_1", "Independent_273_2": "Independent_273_2", "Independent_274_1": "Independent_274_1", "Independent_274_2": "Independent_274_2", "Independent_274_3": "Independent_274_3", "Independent_275_1": "Independent_275_1", "Independent_276_1": "Independent_276_1", "Independent_276_2": "Independent_276_2", "Independent_276_3": "Independent_276_3", "Independent_277_1": "Independent_277_1", "Independent_277_2": "Independent_277_2", "Independent_277_3": "Independent_277_3", "Independent_277_4": "Independent_277_4", "Independent_277_5": "Independent_277_5", "Independent_277_6": "Independent_277_6", "TRPK": "TRPK", "Independent_278_1": "Independent_278_1", "Independent_278_2": "Independent_278_2", "Independent_278_3": "Independent_278_3", "Independent_278_4": "Independent_278_4", "Independent_278_5": "Independent_278_5", "Independent_278_6": "Independent_278_6", "Independent_278_7": "Independent_278_7", "Independent_278_8": "Independent_278_8", "Independent_278_9": "Independent_278_9", "Independent_279_1": "Independent_279_1", "Independent_279_2": "Independent_279_2", "SWARAJ": "SWARAJ", "Independent_279_3": "Independent_279_3", "Independent_279_4": "Independent_279_4", "Independent_279_5": "Independent_279_5", "Independent_279_6": "Independent_279_6", "Independent_279_7": "Independent_279_7", "Independent_279_8": "Independent_279_8", "Independent_280_1": "Independent_280_1", "Independent_280_2": "Independent_280_2", "Independent_280_3": "Independent_280_3", "Independent_280_4": "Independent_280_4", "Independent_281_1": "Independent_281_1", "Independent_282_1": "Independent_282_1", "Independent_282_2": "Independent_282_2", "Independent_282_3": "Independent_282_3", "Independent_282_4": "Independent_282_4", "Independent_282_5": "Independent_282_5", "Independent_282_6": "Independent_282_6", "Independent_282_7": "Independent_282_7", "Independent_282_8": "Independent_282_8", "Independent_283_1": "Independent_283_1", "Independent_283_2": "Independent_283_2", "Independent_283_3": "Independent_283_3", "Independent_284_1": "Independent_284_1", "Independent_284_2": "Independent_284_2", "Independent_284_3": "Independent_284_3", "Independent_285_1": "Independent_285_1", "Independent_285_2": "Independent_285_2", "Independent_285_3": "Independent_285_3", "Independent_285_4": "Independent_285_4", "Independent_285_5": "Independent_285_5", "Independent_286_1": "Independent_286_1", "Independent_286_2": "Independent_286_2", "Independent_286_3": "Independent_286_3", "Independent_286_4": "Independent_286_4", "Independent_286_5": "Independent_286_5", "Independent_287_1": "Independent_287_1", "Independent_288_1": "Independent_288_1", "Independent_288_2": "Independent_288_2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 288, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 288, "registered_not_positive": 288}, "n_stations_flagged": 288, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:40:29.452302", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.43, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.324, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.656, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.664, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.43, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.43, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.324, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.324, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.563, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.527, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 288}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "874a82d6c2034a8e938c0528f27868f8", "name": "India 2015 local (overnight india-bihar-2015-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2015, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Bihar/Bihar_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AAHPTY": "AAHPTY", "AAMJP": "AAMJP", "ABHKP": "ABHKP", "ABHM": "ABHM", "ABJS": "ABJS", "ABRS": "ABRS", "AD": "AD", "AHFBK": "AHFBK", "AICP": "AICP", "AIFB": "AIFB", "AIFB_S": "AIFB_S", "AIMIM": "AIMIM", "AJPR": "AJPR", "AKBMP": "AKBMP", "AMIP": "AMIP", "ATBP": "ATBP", "AVIRP": "AVIRP", "BAJAP": "BAJAP", "BBC": "BBC", "BBMP": "BBMP", "BDBP": "BDBP", "BDEP": "BDEP", "BDLP": "BDLP", "BED": "BED", "BHASP": "BHASP", "BHNP": "BHNP", "BIP": "BIP", "BJHP": "BJHP", "BJJD": "BJJD", "BJKD": "BJKD", "BJKVP": "BJKVP", "BJND": "BJND", "BJP": "BJP", "BJPART_Y": "BJPART_Y", "BKKMP": "BKKMP", "BKP": "BKP", "BKVP": "BKVP", "BLRP": "BLRP", "BLSP": "BLSP", "BMF": "BMF", "BMTRP": "BMTRP", "BMUP": "BMUP", "BNDL": "BNDL", "BNSKP": "BNSKP", "BSP": "BSP", "BVM": "BVM", "BYPD": "BYPD", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI_ML_L": "CPI_ML_L", "CPI_M_L_L": "CPI_M_L_L", "CPM": "CPM", "C_S": "C_S", "DKP": "DKP", "DSP": "DSP", "GAAP": "GAAP", "GJDS": "GJDS", "GJNP": "GJNP", "HAMS": "HAMS", "HCP": "HCP", "HKRD": "HKRD", "HMSP": "HMSP", "HND": "HND", "HVD": "HVD", "IEMC": "IEMC", "INC": "INC", "IPTY": "IPTY", "IPty": "IPty", "IUML": "IUML", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_100_2": "Independent_100_2", "Independent_100_3": "Independent_100_3", "Independent_100_4": "Independent_100_4", "Independent_100_5": "Independent_100_5", "Independent_100_6": "Independent_100_6", "Independent_100_7": "Independent_100_7", "Independent_101_1": "Independent_101_1", "Independent_101_2": "Independent_101_2", "Independent_101_3": "Independent_101_3", "Independent_101_4": "Independent_101_4", "Independent_101_5": "Independent_101_5", "Independent_102_1": "Independent_102_1", "Independent_102_2": "Independent_102_2", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_103_2": "Independent_103_2", "Independent_103_3": "Independent_103_3", "Independent_104_1": "Independent_104_1", "Independent_104_2": "Independent_104_2", "Independent_104_3": "Independent_104_3", "Independent_104_4": "Independent_104_4", "Independent_105_1": "Independent_105_1", "Independent_105_2": "Independent_105_2", "Independent_105_3": "Independent_105_3", "Independent_105_4": "Independent_105_4", "Independent_105_5": "Independent_105_5", "Independent_105_6": "Independent_105_6", "Independent_105_7": "Independent_105_7", "Independent_106_1": "Independent_106_1", "Independent_106_2": "Independent_106_2", "Independent_106_3": "Independent_106_3", "Independent_106_4": "Independent_106_4", "Independent_106_5": "Independent_106_5", "Independent_106_6": "Independent_106_6", "Independent_106_7": "Independent_106_7", "Independent_107_1": "Independent_107_1", "Independent_107_2": "Independent_107_2", "Independent_108_1": "Independent_108_1", "Independent_108_2": "Independent_108_2", "Independent_108_3": "Independent_108_3", "Independent_108_4": "Independent_108_4", "Independent_109_1": "Independent_109_1", "Independent_109_2": "Independent_109_2", "Independent_109_3": "Independent_109_3", "Independent_109_4": "Independent_109_4", "Independent_109_5": "Independent_109_5", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "Independent_10_3": "Independent_10_3", "Independent_10_4": "Independent_10_4", "Independent_110_1": "Independent_110_1", "Independent_110_2": "Independent_110_2", "Independent_110_3": "Independent_110_3", "Independent_110_4": "Independent_110_4", "Independent_110_5": "Independent_110_5", "Independent_110_6": "Independent_110_6", "Independent_110_7": "Independent_110_7", "Independent_110_8": "Independent_110_8", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "Independent_111_2": "Independent_111_2", "Independent_111_3": "Independent_111_3", "Independent_111_4": "Independent_111_4", "Independent_111_5": "Independent_111_5", "Independent_111_6": "Independent_111_6", "Independent_111_7": "Independent_111_7", "Independent_111_8": "Independent_111_8", "Independent_112_1": "Independent_112_1", "Independent_112_2": "Independent_112_2", "Independent_112_3": "Independent_112_3", "Independent_112_4": "Independent_112_4", "Independent_112_5": "Independent_112_5", "Independent_113_1": "Independent_113_1", "Independent_113_2": "Independent_113_2", "Independent_113_3": "Independent_113_3", "Independent_113_4": "Independent_113_4", "Independent_113_5": "Independent_113_5", "Independent_114_1": "Independent_114_1", "Independent_114_2": "Independent_114_2", "Independent_114_3": "Independent_114_3", "Independent_114_4": "Independent_114_4", "Independent_114_5": "Independent_114_5", "Independent_114_6": "Independent_114_6", "Independent_114_7": "Independent_114_7", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_115_2": "Independent_115_2", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "Independent_116_2": "Independent_116_2", "Independent_116_3": "Independent_116_3", "Independent_117_1": "Independent_117_1", "Independent_117_2": "Independent_117_2", "Independent_117_3": "Independent_117_3", "Independent_117_4": "Independent_117_4", "Independent_118_1": "Independent_118_1", "Independent_118_2": "Independent_118_2", "Independent_118_3": "Independent_118_3", "Independent_118_4": "Independent_118_4", "Independent_118_5": "Independent_118_5", "Independent_118_6": "Independent_118_6", "Independent_118_7": "Independent_118_7", "Independent_118_8": "Independent_118_8", "Independent_118_9": "Independent_118_9", "Independent_119_1": "Independent_119_1", "Independent_119_2": "Independent_119_2", "Independent_119_3": "Independent_119_3", "Independent_119_4": "Independent_119_4", "Independent_119_5": "Independent_119_5", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "Independent_11_3": "Independent_11_3", "Independent_11_4": "Independent_11_4", "Independent_11_5": "Independent_11_5", "Independent_11_6": "Independent_11_6", "Independent_11_7": "Independent_11_7", "Independent_11_8": "Independent_11_8", "Independent_120_1": "Independent_120_1", "Independent_120_2": "Independent_120_2", "Independent_120_3": "Independent_120_3", "Independent_120_4": "Independent_120_4", "Independent_120_5": "Independent_120_5", "Independent_120_6": "Independent_120_6", "Independent_120_7": "Independent_120_7", "Independent_121_1": "Independent_121_1", "Independent_121_2": "Independent_121_2", "Independent_121_3": "Independent_121_3", "Independent_121_4": "Independent_121_4", "Independent_121_5": "Independent_121_5", "Independent_122_1": "Independent_122_1", "Independent_122_2": "Independent_122_2", "Independent_122_3": "Independent_122_3", "Independent_122_4": "Independent_122_4", "Independent_122_5": "Independent_122_5", "Independent_123_1": "Independent_123_1", "Independent_123_2": "Independent_123_2", "Independent_123_3": "Independent_123_3", "Independent_123_4": "Independent_123_4", "Independent_123_5": "Independent_123_5", "Independent_123_6": "Independent_123_6", "Independent_123_7": "Independent_123_7", "Independent_124_1": "Independent_124_1", "Independent_124_2": "Independent_124_2", "Independent_124_3": "Independent_124_3", "Independent_124_4": "Independent_124_4", "Independent_124_5": "Independent_124_5", "Independent_124_6": "Independent_124_6", "Independent_124_7": "Independent_124_7", "Independent_125_1": "Independent_125_1", "Independent_125_2": "Independent_125_2", "Independent_125_3": "Independent_125_3", "Independent_125_4": "Independent_125_4", "Independent_125_5": "Independent_125_5", "Independent_126_1": "Independent_126_1", "Independent_126_2": "Independent_126_2", "Independent_126_3": "Independent_126_3", "Independent_126_4": "Independent_126_4", "Independent_126_5": "Independent_126_5", "Independent_126_6": "Independent_126_6", "Independent_126_7": "Independent_126_7", "Independent_126_8": "Independent_126_8", "Independent_126_9": "Independent_126_9", "Independent_127_1": "Independent_127_1", "Independent_127_2": "Independent_127_2", "Independent_127_3": "Independent_127_3", "Independent_127_4": "Independent_127_4", "Independent_127_5": "Independent_127_5", "Independent_127_6": "Independent_127_6", "Independent_127_7": "Independent_127_7", "Independent_128_1": "Independent_128_1", "Independent_128_2": "Independent_128_2", "Independent_128_3": "Independent_128_3", "Independent_128_4": "Independent_128_4", "Independent_129_1": "Independent_129_1", "Independent_129_2": "Independent_129_2", "Independent_129_3": "Independent_129_3", "Independent_129_4": "Independent_129_4", "Independent_129_5": "Independent_129_5", "Independent_129_6": "Independent_129_6", "Independent_129_7": "Independent_129_7", "Independent_129_8": "Independent_129_8", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "Independent_12_3": "Independent_12_3", "Independent_12_4": "Independent_12_4", "Independent_12_5": "Independent_12_5", "Independent_130_1": "Independent_130_1", "Independent_130_2": "Independent_130_2", "Independent_130_3": "Independent_130_3", "Independent_130_4": "Independent_130_4", "Independent_130_5": "Independent_130_5", "Independent_130_6": "Independent_130_6", "Independent_130_7": "Independent_130_7", "Independent_130_8": "Independent_130_8", "Independent_131_1": "Independent_131_1", "Independent_131_2": "Independent_131_2", "Independent_131_3": "Independent_131_3", "Independent_132_1": "Independent_132_1", "Independent_132_2": "Independent_132_2", "Independent_133_1": "Independent_133_1", "Independent_133_2": "Independent_133_2", "Independent_133_3": "Independent_133_3", "Independent_134_1": "Independent_134_1", "Independent_134_2": "Independent_134_2", "Independent_134_3": "Independent_134_3", "Independent_134_4": "Independent_134_4", "Independent_135_1": "Independent_135_1", "Independent_135_2": "Independent_135_2", "Independent_135_3": "Independent_135_3", "Independent_135_4": "Independent_135_4", "Independent_135_5": "Independent_135_5", "Independent_135_6": "Independent_135_6", "Independent_135_7": "Independent_135_7", "Independent_136_1": "Independent_136_1", "Independent_137_1": "Independent_137_1", "Independent_137_2": "Independent_137_2", "Independent_137_3": "Independent_137_3", "Independent_137_4": "Independent_137_4", "Independent_137_5": "Independent_137_5", "Independent_137_6": "Independent_137_6", "Independent_137_7": "Independent_137_7", "Independent_138_1": "Independent_138_1", "Independent_138_2": "Independent_138_2", "Independent_139_1": "Independent_139_1", "Independent_139_2": "Independent_139_2", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_140_1": "Independent_140_1", "Independent_140_2": "Independent_140_2", "Independent_141_1": "Independent_141_1", "Independent_141_2": "Independent_141_2", "Independent_142_1": "Independent_142_1", "Independent_142_2": "Independent_142_2", "Independent_142_3": "Independent_142_3", "Independent_142_4": "Independent_142_4", "Independent_143_1": "Independent_143_1", "Independent_143_2": "Independent_143_2", "Independent_143_3": "Independent_143_3", "Independent_144_1": "Independent_144_1", "Independent_144_2": "Independent_144_2", "Independent_144_3": "Independent_144_3", "Independent_145_1": "Independent_145_1", "Independent_145_2": "Independent_145_2", "Independent_146_1": "Independent_146_1", "Independent_146_2": "Independent_146_2", "Independent_146_3": "Independent_146_3", "Independent_146_4": "Independent_146_4", "Independent_147_1": "Independent_147_1", "Independent_147_2": "Independent_147_2", "Independent_148_1": "Independent_148_1", "Independent_148_2": "Independent_148_2", "Independent_148_3": "Independent_148_3", "Independent_148_4": "Independent_148_4", "Independent_149_1": "Independent_149_1", "Independent_149_2": "Independent_149_2", "Independent_149_3": "Independent_149_3", "Independent_149_4": "Independent_149_4", "Independent_149_5": "Independent_149_5", "Independent_149_6": "Independent_149_6", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "Independent_150_1": "Independent_150_1", "Independent_150_2": "Independent_150_2", "Independent_150_3": "Independent_150_3", "Independent_150_4": "Independent_150_4", "Independent_151_1": "Independent_151_1", "Independent_151_2": "Independent_151_2", "Independent_151_3": "Independent_151_3", "Independent_151_4": "Independent_151_4", "Independent_151_5": "Independent_151_5", "Independent_152_1": "Independent_152_1", "Independent_152_2": "Independent_152_2", "Independent_152_3": "Independent_152_3", "Independent_152_4": "Independent_152_4", "Independent_152_5": "Independent_152_5", "Independent_152_6": "Independent_152_6", "Independent_152_7": "Independent_152_7", "Independent_153_1": "Independent_153_1", "Independent_153_2": "Independent_153_2", "Independent_153_3": "Independent_153_3", "Independent_153_4": "Independent_153_4", "Independent_153_5": "Independent_153_5", "Independent_153_6": "Independent_153_6", "Independent_153_7": "Independent_153_7", "Independent_154_1": "Independent_154_1", "Independent_154_2": "Independent_154_2", "Independent_154_3": "Independent_154_3", "Independent_154_4": "Independent_154_4", "Independent_155_1": "Independent_155_1", "Independent_155_2": "Independent_155_2", "Independent_155_3": "Independent_155_3", "Independent_155_4": "Independent_155_4", "Independent_155_5": "Independent_155_5", "Independent_156_1": "Independent_156_1", "Independent_156_2": "Independent_156_2", "Independent_156_3": "Independent_156_3", "Independent_157_1": "Independent_157_1", "Independent_157_2": "Independent_157_2", "Independent_157_3": "Independent_157_3", "Independent_157_4": "Independent_157_4", "Independent_158_1": "Independent_158_1", "Independent_158_2": "Independent_158_2", "Independent_159_1": "Independent_159_1", "Independent_159_2": "Independent_159_2", "Independent_159_3": "Independent_159_3", "Independent_159_4": "Independent_159_4", "Independent_159_5": "Independent_159_5", "Independent_159_6": "Independent_159_6", "Independent_159_7": "Independent_159_7", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_161_1": "Independent_161_1", "Independent_161_2": "Independent_161_2", "Independent_161_3": "Independent_161_3", "Independent_161_4": "Independent_161_4", "Independent_161_5": "Independent_161_5", "Independent_162_1": "Independent_162_1", "Independent_162_2": "Independent_162_2", "Independent_162_3": "Independent_162_3", "Independent_163_1": "Independent_163_1", "Independent_163_2": "Independent_163_2", "Independent_163_3": "Independent_163_3", "Independent_163_4": "Independent_163_4", "Independent_163_5": "Independent_163_5", "Independent_164_1": "Independent_164_1", "Independent_164_2": "Independent_164_2", "Independent_164_3": "Independent_164_3", "Independent_165_1": "Independent_165_1", "Independent_165_2": "Independent_165_2", "Independent_165_3": "Independent_165_3", "Independent_165_4": "Independent_165_4", "Independent_165_5": "Independent_165_5", "Independent_166_1": "Independent_166_1", "Independent_166_2": "Independent_166_2", "Independent_166_3": "Independent_166_3", "Independent_166_4": "Independent_166_4", "Independent_167_1": "Independent_167_1", "Independent_167_2": "Independent_167_2", "Independent_167_3": "Independent_167_3", "Independent_167_4": "Independent_167_4", "Independent_167_5": "Independent_167_5", "Independent_167_6": "Independent_167_6", "Independent_167_7": "Independent_167_7", "Independent_167_8": "Independent_167_8", "Independent_168_1": "Independent_168_1", "Independent_168_2": "Independent_168_2", "Independent_169_1": "Independent_169_1", "Independent_169_2": "Independent_169_2", "Independent_169_3": "Independent_169_3", "Independent_169_4": "Independent_169_4", "Independent_169_5": "Independent_169_5", "Independent_169_6": "Independent_169_6", "Independent_169_7": "Independent_169_7", "Independent_169_8": "Independent_169_8", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_16_2": "Independent_16_2", "Independent_170_1": "Independent_170_1", "Independent_170_2": "Independent_170_2", "Independent_170_3": "Independent_170_3", "Independent_170_4": "Independent_170_4", "Independent_170_5": "Independent_170_5", "Independent_170_6": "Independent_170_6", "Independent_171_1": "Independent_171_1", "Independent_171_2": "Independent_171_2", "Independent_171_3": "Independent_171_3", "Independent_172_1": "Independent_172_1", "Independent_172_2": "Independent_172_2", "Independent_172_3": "Independent_172_3", "Independent_172_4": "Independent_172_4", "Independent_172_5": "Independent_172_5", "Independent_172_6": "Independent_172_6", "Independent_172_7": "Independent_172_7", "Independent_172_8": "Independent_172_8", "Independent_173_1": "Independent_173_1", "Independent_173_2": "Independent_173_2", "Independent_173_3": "Independent_173_3", "Independent_173_4": "Independent_173_4", "Independent_174_1": "Independent_174_1", "Independent_174_2": "Independent_174_2", "Independent_174_3": "Independent_174_3", "Independent_174_4": "Independent_174_4", "Independent_174_5": "Independent_174_5", "Independent_174_6": "Independent_174_6", "Independent_174_7": "Independent_174_7", "Independent_174_8": "Independent_174_8", "Independent_174_9": "Independent_174_9", "Independent_175_1": "Independent_175_1", "Independent_175_2": "Independent_175_2", "Independent_175_3": "Independent_175_3", "Independent_175_4": "Independent_175_4", "Independent_175_5": "Independent_175_5", "Independent_176_1": "Independent_176_1", "Independent_176_2": "Independent_176_2", "Independent_177_1": "Independent_177_1", "Independent_177_2": "Independent_177_2", "Independent_177_3": "Independent_177_3", "Independent_177_4": "Independent_177_4", "Independent_177_5": "Independent_177_5", "Independent_177_6": "Independent_177_6", "Independent_178_1": "Independent_178_1", "Independent_178_2": "Independent_178_2", "Independent_178_3": "Independent_178_3", "Independent_178_4": "Independent_178_4", "Independent_178_5": "Independent_178_5", "Independent_178_6": "Independent_178_6", "Independent_179_1": "Independent_179_1", "Independent_179_2": "Independent_179_2", "Independent_179_3": "Independent_179_3", "Independent_179_4": "Independent_179_4", "Independent_179_5": "Independent_179_5", "Independent_179_6": "Independent_179_6", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "Independent_17_3": "Independent_17_3", "Independent_17_4": "Independent_17_4", "Independent_17_5": "Independent_17_5", "Independent_180_1": "Independent_180_1", "Independent_180_2": "Independent_180_2", "Independent_180_3": "Independent_180_3", "Independent_180_4": "Independent_180_4", "Independent_180_5": "Independent_180_5", "Independent_180_6": "Independent_180_6", "Independent_181_1": "Independent_181_1", "Independent_181_2": "Independent_181_2", "Independent_181_3": "Independent_181_3", "Independent_181_4": "Independent_181_4", "Independent_181_5": "Independent_181_5", "Independent_181_6": "Independent_181_6", "Independent_181_7": "Independent_181_7", "Independent_182_1": "Independent_182_1", "Independent_182_2": "Independent_182_2", "Independent_182_3": "Independent_182_3", "Independent_182_4": "Independent_182_4", "Independent_182_5": "Independent_182_5", "Independent_183_1": "Independent_183_1", "Independent_183_10": "Independent_183_10", "Independent_183_11": "Independent_183_11", "Independent_183_2": "Independent_183_2", "Independent_183_3": "Independent_183_3", "Independent_183_4": "Independent_183_4", "Independent_183_5": "Independent_183_5", "Independent_183_6": "Independent_183_6", "Independent_183_7": "Independent_183_7", "Independent_183_8": "Independent_183_8", "Independent_183_9": "Independent_183_9", "Independent_184_1": "Independent_184_1", "Independent_184_2": "Independent_184_2", "Independent_185_1": "Independent_185_1", "Independent_185_2": "Independent_185_2", "Independent_185_3": "Independent_185_3", "Independent_186_1": "Independent_186_1", "Independent_186_2": "Independent_186_2", "Independent_186_3": "Independent_186_3", "Independent_186_4": "Independent_186_4", "Independent_187_1": "Independent_187_1", "Independent_187_2": "Independent_187_2", "Independent_187_3": "Independent_187_3", "Independent_188_1": "Independent_188_1", "Independent_188_2": "Independent_188_2", "Independent_188_3": "Independent_188_3", "Independent_188_4": "Independent_188_4", "Independent_188_5": "Independent_188_5", "Independent_189_1": "Independent_189_1", "Independent_189_2": "Independent_189_2", "Independent_189_3": "Independent_189_3", "Independent_189_4": "Independent_189_4", "Independent_189_5": "Independent_189_5", "Independent_189_6": "Independent_189_6", "Independent_189_7": "Independent_189_7", "Independent_189_8": "Independent_189_8", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_18_3": "Independent_18_3", "Independent_190_1": "Independent_190_1", "Independent_190_2": "Independent_190_2", "Independent_190_3": "Independent_190_3", "Independent_190_4": "Independent_190_4", "Independent_190_5": "Independent_190_5", "Independent_191_1": "Independent_191_1", "Independent_191_2": "Independent_191_2", "Independent_191_3": "Independent_191_3", "Independent_191_4": "Independent_191_4", "Independent_191_5": "Independent_191_5", "Independent_192_1": "Independent_192_1", "Independent_192_2": "Independent_192_2", "Independent_193_1": "Independent_193_1", "Independent_193_2": "Independent_193_2", "Independent_193_3": "Independent_193_3", "Independent_194_1": "Independent_194_1", "Independent_194_2": "Independent_194_2", "Independent_194_3": "Independent_194_3", "Independent_195_1": "Independent_195_1", "Independent_196_1": "Independent_196_1", "Independent_196_2": "Independent_196_2", "Independent_196_3": "Independent_196_3", "Independent_196_4": "Independent_196_4", "Independent_196_5": "Independent_196_5", "Independent_197_1": "Independent_197_1", "Independent_197_10": "Independent_197_10", "Independent_197_2": "Independent_197_2", "Independent_197_3": "Independent_197_3", "Independent_197_4": "Independent_197_4", "Independent_197_5": "Independent_197_5", "Independent_197_6": "Independent_197_6", "Independent_197_7": "Independent_197_7", "Independent_197_8": "Independent_197_8", "Independent_197_9": "Independent_197_9", "Independent_198_1": "Independent_198_1", "Independent_198_2": "Independent_198_2", "Independent_198_3": "Independent_198_3", "Independent_198_4": "Independent_198_4", "Independent_198_5": "Independent_198_5", "Independent_198_6": "Independent_198_6", "Independent_199_1": "Independent_199_1", "Independent_199_2": "Independent_199_2", "Independent_199_3": "Independent_199_3", "Independent_199_4": "Independent_199_4", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "Independent_1_3": "Independent_1_3", "Independent_1_4": "Independent_1_4", "Independent_1_5": "Independent_1_5", "Independent_200_1": "Independent_200_1", "Independent_200_10": "Independent_200_10", "Independent_200_11": "Independent_200_11", "Independent_200_12": "Independent_200_12", "Independent_200_13": "Independent_200_13", "Independent_200_14": "Independent_200_14", "Independent_200_15": "Independent_200_15", "Independent_200_2": "Independent_200_2", "Independent_200_3": "Independent_200_3", "Independent_200_4": "Independent_200_4", "Independent_200_5": "Independent_200_5", "Independent_200_6": "Independent_200_6", "Independent_200_7": "Independent_200_7", "Independent_200_8": "Independent_200_8", "Independent_200_9": "Independent_200_9", "Independent_201_1": "Independent_201_1", "Independent_201_10": "Independent_201_10", "Independent_201_2": "Independent_201_2", "Independent_201_3": "Independent_201_3", "Independent_201_4": "Independent_201_4", "Independent_201_5": "Independent_201_5", "Independent_201_6": "Independent_201_6", "Independent_201_7": "Independent_201_7", "Independent_201_8": "Independent_201_8", "Independent_201_9": "Independent_201_9", "Independent_202_1": "Independent_202_1", "Independent_202_2": "Independent_202_2", "Independent_202_3": "Independent_202_3", "Independent_202_4": "Independent_202_4", "Independent_203_1": "Independent_203_1", "Independent_203_2": "Independent_203_2", "Independent_203_3": "Independent_203_3", "Independent_203_4": "Independent_203_4", "Independent_203_5": "Independent_203_5", "Independent_204_1": "Independent_204_1", "Independent_204_2": "Independent_204_2", "Independent_204_3": "Independent_204_3", "Independent_204_4": "Independent_204_4", "Independent_204_5": "Independent_204_5", "Independent_204_6": "Independent_204_6", "Independent_205_1": "Independent_205_1", "Independent_205_2": "Independent_205_2", "Independent_205_3": "Independent_205_3", "Independent_205_4": "Independent_205_4", "Independent_205_5": "Independent_205_5", "Independent_205_6": "Independent_205_6", "Independent_205_7": "Independent_205_7", "Independent_206_1": "Independent_206_1", "Independent_206_2": "Independent_206_2", "Independent_206_3": "Independent_206_3", "Independent_206_4": "Independent_206_4", "Independent_206_5": "Independent_206_5", "Independent_206_6": "Independent_206_6", "Independent_207_1": "Independent_207_1", "Independent_207_2": "Independent_207_2", "Independent_208_1": "Independent_208_1", "Independent_208_2": "Independent_208_2", "Independent_208_3": "Independent_208_3", "Independent_208_4": "Independent_208_4", "Independent_208_5": "Independent_208_5", "Independent_208_6": "Independent_208_6", "Independent_208_7": "Independent_208_7", "Independent_209_1": "Independent_209_1", "Independent_209_2": "Independent_209_2", "Independent_209_3": "Independent_209_3", "Independent_209_4": "Independent_209_4", "Independent_209_5": "Independent_209_5", "Independent_209_6": "Independent_209_6", "Independent_209_7": "Independent_209_7", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_20_2": "Independent_20_2", "Independent_20_3": "Independent_20_3", "Independent_20_4": "Independent_20_4", "Independent_20_5": "Independent_20_5", "Independent_210_1": "Independent_210_1", "Independent_210_2": "Independent_210_2", "Independent_210_3": "Independent_210_3", "Independent_210_4": "Independent_210_4", "Independent_210_5": "Independent_210_5", "Independent_210_6": "Independent_210_6", "Independent_210_7": "Independent_210_7", "Independent_210_8": "Independent_210_8", "Independent_211_1": "Independent_211_1", "Independent_211_2": "Independent_211_2", "Independent_211_3": "Independent_211_3", "Independent_211_4": "Independent_211_4", "Independent_211_5": "Independent_211_5", "Independent_212_1": "Independent_212_1", "Independent_212_2": "Independent_212_2", "Independent_212_3": "Independent_212_3", "Independent_212_4": "Independent_212_4", "Independent_212_5": "Independent_212_5", "Independent_212_6": "Independent_212_6", "Independent_213_1": "Independent_213_1", "Independent_213_2": "Independent_213_2", "Independent_213_3": "Independent_213_3", "Independent_213_4": "Independent_213_4", "Independent_213_5": "Independent_213_5", "Independent_214_1": "Independent_214_1", "Independent_214_2": "Independent_214_2", "Independent_214_3": "Independent_214_3", "Independent_215_1": "Independent_215_1", "Independent_215_2": "Independent_215_2", "Independent_215_3": "Independent_215_3", "Independent_215_4": "Independent_215_4", "Independent_215_5": "Independent_215_5", "Independent_215_6": "Independent_215_6", "Independent_215_7": "Independent_215_7", "Independent_215_8": "Independent_215_8", "Independent_216_1": "Independent_216_1", "Independent_216_2": "Independent_216_2", "Independent_216_3": "Independent_216_3", "Independent_216_4": "Independent_216_4", "Independent_217_1": "Independent_217_1", "Independent_219_1": "Independent_219_1", "Independent_219_10": "Independent_219_10", "Independent_219_11": "Independent_219_11", "Independent_219_2": "Independent_219_2", "Independent_219_3": "Independent_219_3", "Independent_219_4": "Independent_219_4", "Independent_219_5": "Independent_219_5", "Independent_219_6": "Independent_219_6", "Independent_219_7": "Independent_219_7", "Independent_219_8": "Independent_219_8", "Independent_219_9": "Independent_219_9", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_21_2": "Independent_21_2", "Independent_21_3": "Independent_21_3", "Independent_21_4": "Independent_21_4", "Independent_220_1": "Independent_220_1", "Independent_220_2": "Independent_220_2", "Independent_220_3": "Independent_220_3", "Independent_220_4": "Independent_220_4", "Independent_220_5": "Independent_220_5", "Independent_221_1": "Independent_221_1", "Independent_221_2": "Independent_221_2", "Independent_221_3": "Independent_221_3", "Independent_221_4": "Independent_221_4", "Independent_221_5": "Independent_221_5", "Independent_221_6": "Independent_221_6", "Independent_221_7": "Independent_221_7", "Independent_222_1": "Independent_222_1", "Independent_222_2": "Independent_222_2", "Independent_223_1": "Independent_223_1", "Independent_223_10": "Independent_223_10", "Independent_223_2": "Independent_223_2", "Independent_223_3": "Independent_223_3", "Independent_223_4": "Independent_223_4", "Independent_223_5": "Independent_223_5", "Independent_223_6": "Independent_223_6", "Independent_223_7": "Independent_223_7", "Independent_223_8": "Independent_223_8", "Independent_223_9": "Independent_223_9", "Independent_224_1": "Independent_224_1", "Independent_224_2": "Independent_224_2", "Independent_224_3": "Independent_224_3", "Independent_224_4": "Independent_224_4", "Independent_224_5": "Independent_224_5", "Independent_225_1": "Independent_225_1", "Independent_226_1": "Independent_226_1", "Independent_226_2": "Independent_226_2", "Independent_226_3": "Independent_226_3", "Independent_226_4": "Independent_226_4", "Independent_228_1": "Independent_228_1", "Independent_229_1": "Independent_229_1", "Independent_229_2": "Independent_229_2", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_22_2": "Independent_22_2", "Independent_22_3": "Independent_22_3", "Independent_22_4": "Independent_22_4", "Independent_230_1": "Independent_230_1", "Independent_230_2": "Independent_230_2", "Independent_230_3": "Independent_230_3", "Independent_230_4": "Independent_230_4", "Independent_230_5": "Independent_230_5", "Independent_230_6": "Independent_230_6", "Independent_231_1": "Independent_231_1", "Independent_231_2": "Independent_231_2", "Independent_231_3": "Independent_231_3", "Independent_232_1": "Independent_232_1", "Independent_233_1": "Independent_233_1", "Independent_233_2": "Independent_233_2", "Independent_233_3": "Independent_233_3", "Independent_233_4": "Independent_233_4", "Independent_233_5": "Independent_233_5", "Independent_233_6": "Independent_233_6", "Independent_233_7": "Independent_233_7", "Independent_234_1": "Independent_234_1", "Independent_236_1": "Independent_236_1", "Independent_236_2": "Independent_236_2", "Independent_237_1": "Independent_237_1", "Independent_237_2": "Independent_237_2", "Independent_237_3": "Independent_237_3", "Independent_237_4": "Independent_237_4", "Independent_237_5": "Independent_237_5", "Independent_237_6": "Independent_237_6", "Independent_238_1": "Independent_238_1", "Independent_238_2": "Independent_238_2", "Independent_238_3": "Independent_238_3", "Independent_238_4": "Independent_238_4", "Independent_238_5": "Independent_238_5", "Independent_239_1": "Independent_239_1", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_23_2": "Independent_23_2", "Independent_23_3": "Independent_23_3", "Independent_23_4": "Independent_23_4", "Independent_23_5": "Independent_23_5", "Independent_23_6": "Independent_23_6", "Independent_23_7": "Independent_23_7", "Independent_240_1": "Independent_240_1", "Independent_241_1": "Independent_241_1", "Independent_241_2": "Independent_241_2", "Independent_241_3": "Independent_241_3", "Independent_241_4": "Independent_241_4", "Independent_241_5": "Independent_241_5", "Independent_241_6": "Independent_241_6", "Independent_241_7": "Independent_241_7", "Independent_241_8": "Independent_241_8", "Independent_241_9": "Independent_241_9", "Independent_242_1": "Independent_242_1", "Independent_242_2": "Independent_242_2", "Independent_242_3": "Independent_242_3", "Independent_242_4": "Independent_242_4", "Independent_242_5": "Independent_242_5", "Independent_243_1": "Independent_243_1", "Independent_243_2": "Independent_243_2", "Independent_243_3": "Independent_243_3", "Independent_243_4": "Independent_243_4", "Independent_243_5": "Independent_243_5", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "Independent_24_2": "Independent_24_2", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_10": "Independent_26_10", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "Independent_26_3": "Independent_26_3", "Independent_26_4": "Independent_26_4", "Independent_26_5": "Independent_26_5", "Independent_26_6": "Independent_26_6", "Independent_26_7": "Independent_26_7", "Independent_26_8": "Independent_26_8", "Independent_26_9": "Independent_26_9", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_10": "Independent_27_10", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "Independent_27_3": "Independent_27_3", "Independent_27_4": "Independent_27_4", "Independent_27_5": "Independent_27_5", "Independent_27_6": "Independent_27_6", "Independent_27_7": "Independent_27_7", "Independent_27_8": "Independent_27_8", "Independent_27_9": "Independent_27_9", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "Independent_28_4": "Independent_28_4", "Independent_28_5": "Independent_28_5", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "Independent_29_4": "Independent_29_4", "Independent_29_5": "Independent_29_5", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "Independent_2_3": "Independent_2_3", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "Independent_30_3": "Independent_30_3", "Independent_30_4": "Independent_30_4", "Independent_30_5": "Independent_30_5", "Independent_30_6": "Independent_30_6", "Independent_30_7": "Independent_30_7", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_31_2": "Independent_31_2", "Independent_31_3": "Independent_31_3", "Independent_31_4": "Independent_31_4", "Independent_31_5": "Independent_31_5", "Independent_31_6": "Independent_31_6", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_32_3": "Independent_32_3", "Independent_32_4": "Independent_32_4", "Independent_32_5": "Independent_32_5", "Independent_32_6": "Independent_32_6", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "Independent_33_4": "Independent_33_4", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_34_3": "Independent_34_3", "Independent_34_4": "Independent_34_4", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "Independent_35_2": "Independent_35_2", "Independent_35_3": "Independent_35_3", "Independent_35_4": "Independent_35_4", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_36_3": "Independent_36_3", "Independent_36_4": "Independent_36_4", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "Independent_37_3": "Independent_37_3", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_38_3": "Independent_38_3", "Independent_38_4": "Independent_38_4", "Independent_38_5": "Independent_38_5", "Independent_38_6": "Independent_38_6", "Independent_38_7": "Independent_38_7", "Independent_38_8": "Independent_38_8", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_39_2": "Independent_39_2", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "Independent_3_3": "Independent_3_3", "Independent_3_4": "Independent_3_4", "Independent_3_5": "Independent_3_5", "Independent_3_6": "Independent_3_6", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_40_3": "Independent_40_3", "Independent_40_4": "Independent_40_4", "Independent_40_5": "Independent_40_5", "Independent_40_6": "Independent_40_6", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_42_2": "Independent_42_2", "Independent_42_3": "Independent_42_3", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_45_2": "Independent_45_2", "Independent_45_3": "Independent_45_3", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_48_2": "Independent_48_2", "Independent_48_3": "Independent_48_3", "Independent_48_4": "Independent_48_4", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "Independent_49_3": "Independent_49_3", "Independent_49_4": "Independent_49_4", "Independent_49_5": "Independent_49_5", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "Independent_4_4": "Independent_4_4", "Independent_4_5": "Independent_4_5", "Independent_4_6": "Independent_4_6", "Independent_4_7": "Independent_4_7", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_50_3": "Independent_50_3", "Independent_50_4": "Independent_50_4", "Independent_50_5": "Independent_50_5", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "Independent_52_3": "Independent_52_3", "Independent_52_4": "Independent_52_4", "Independent_52_5": "Independent_52_5", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "Independent_53_2": "Independent_53_2", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_54_3": "Independent_54_3", "Independent_54_4": "Independent_54_4", "Independent_54_5": "Independent_54_5", "Independent_54_6": "Independent_54_6", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_56_2": "Independent_56_2", "Independent_56_3": "Independent_56_3", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_57_2": "Independent_57_2", "Independent_58_1": "Independent_58_1", "Independent_58_2": "Independent_58_2", "Independent_58_3": "Independent_58_3", "Independent_58_4": "Independent_58_4", "Independent_58_5": "Independent_58_5", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_59_2": "Independent_59_2", "Independent_59_3": "Independent_59_3", "Independent_59_4": "Independent_59_4", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "Independent_5_2": "Independent_5_2", "Independent_5_3": "Independent_5_3", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_60_10": "Independent_60_10", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "Independent_60_3": "Independent_60_3", "Independent_60_4": "Independent_60_4", "Independent_60_5": "Independent_60_5", "Independent_60_6": "Independent_60_6", "Independent_60_7": "Independent_60_7", "Independent_60_8": "Independent_60_8", "Independent_60_9": "Independent_60_9", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "Independent_61_10": "Independent_61_10", "Independent_61_11": "Independent_61_11", "Independent_61_12": "Independent_61_12", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "Independent_61_3": "Independent_61_3", "Independent_61_4": "Independent_61_4", "Independent_61_5": "Independent_61_5", "Independent_61_6": "Independent_61_6", "Independent_61_7": "Independent_61_7", "Independent_61_8": "Independent_61_8", "Independent_61_9": "Independent_61_9", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_10": "Independent_62_10", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_62_3": "Independent_62_3", "Independent_62_4": "Independent_62_4", "Independent_62_5": "Independent_62_5", "Independent_62_6": "Independent_62_6", "Independent_62_7": "Independent_62_7", "Independent_62_8": "Independent_62_8", "Independent_62_9": "Independent_62_9", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_63_10": "Independent_63_10", "Independent_63_11": "Independent_63_11", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "Independent_63_3": "Independent_63_3", "Independent_63_4": "Independent_63_4", "Independent_63_5": "Independent_63_5", "Independent_63_6": "Independent_63_6", "Independent_63_7": "Independent_63_7", "Independent_63_8": "Independent_63_8", "Independent_63_9": "Independent_63_9", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_64_2": "Independent_64_2", "Independent_64_3": "Independent_64_3", "Independent_64_4": "Independent_64_4", "Independent_64_5": "Independent_64_5", "Independent_64_6": "Independent_64_6", "Independent_64_7": "Independent_64_7", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_65_2": "Independent_65_2", "Independent_65_3": "Independent_65_3", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_66_2": "Independent_66_2", "Independent_66_3": "Independent_66_3", "Independent_66_4": "Independent_66_4", "Independent_66_5": "Independent_66_5", "Independent_66_6": "Independent_66_6", "Independent_66_7": "Independent_66_7", "Independent_66_8": "Independent_66_8", "Independent_67_1": "Independent_67_1", "Independent_67_2": "Independent_67_2", "Independent_67_3": "Independent_67_3", "Independent_67_4": "Independent_67_4", "Independent_67_5": "Independent_67_5", "Independent_67_6": "Independent_67_6", "Independent_67_7": "Independent_67_7", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "Independent_68_3": "Independent_68_3", "Independent_68_4": "Independent_68_4", "Independent_68_5": "Independent_68_5", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_69_3": "Independent_69_3", "Independent_69_4": "Independent_69_4", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "Independent_6_2": "Independent_6_2", "Independent_6_3": "Independent_6_3", "Independent_6_4": "Independent_6_4", "Independent_6_5": "Independent_6_5", "Independent_6_6": "Independent_6_6", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "Independent_70_2": "Independent_70_2", "Independent_70_3": "Independent_70_3", "Independent_70_4": "Independent_70_4", "Independent_70_5": "Independent_70_5", "Independent_70_6": "Independent_70_6", "Independent_71_1": "Independent_71_1", "Independent_71_2": "Independent_71_2", "Independent_71_3": "Independent_71_3", "Independent_71_4": "Independent_71_4", "Independent_71_5": "Independent_71_5", "Independent_71_6": "Independent_71_6", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_72_2": "Independent_72_2", "Independent_72_3": "Independent_72_3", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "Independent_73_3": "Independent_73_3", "Independent_73_4": "Independent_73_4", "Independent_73_5": "Independent_73_5", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_75_2": "Independent_75_2", "Independent_75_3": "Independent_75_3", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_76_3": "Independent_76_3", "Independent_76_4": "Independent_76_4", "Independent_76_5": "Independent_76_5", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_77_2": "Independent_77_2", "Independent_77_3": "Independent_77_3", "Independent_77_4": "Independent_77_4", "Independent_77_5": "Independent_77_5", "Independent_77_6": "Independent_77_6", "Independent_77_7": "Independent_77_7", "Independent_77_8": "Independent_77_8", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_78_2": "Independent_78_2", "Independent_78_3": "Independent_78_3", "Independent_79_1": "Independent_79_1", "Independent_79_2": "Independent_79_2", "Independent_79_3": "Independent_79_3", "Independent_79_4": "Independent_79_4", "Independent_79_5": "Independent_79_5", "Independent_79_6": "Independent_79_6", "Independent_79_7": "Independent_79_7", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "Independent_7_2": "Independent_7_2", "Independent_7_3": "Independent_7_3", "Independent_7_4": "Independent_7_4", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_80_2": "Independent_80_2", "Independent_80_3": "Independent_80_3", "Independent_80_4": "Independent_80_4", "Independent_80_5": "Independent_80_5", "Independent_80_6": "Independent_80_6", "Independent_80_7": "Independent_80_7", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "Independent_81_2": "Independent_81_2", "Independent_81_3": "Independent_81_3", "Independent_81_4": "Independent_81_4", "Independent_81_5": "Independent_81_5", "Independent_82_1": "Independent_82_1", "Independent_82_2": "Independent_82_2", "Independent_82_3": "Independent_82_3", "Independent_82_4": "Independent_82_4", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_83_2": "Independent_83_2", "Independent_83_3": "Independent_83_3", "Independent_83_4": "Independent_83_4", "Independent_83_5": "Independent_83_5", "Independent_84_1": "Independent_84_1", "Independent_84_2": "Independent_84_2", "Independent_84_3": "Independent_84_3", "Independent_84_4": "Independent_84_4", "Independent_84_5": "Independent_84_5", "Independent_84_6": "Independent_84_6", "Independent_85_1": "Independent_85_1", "Independent_85_2": "Independent_85_2", "Independent_85_3": "Independent_85_3", "Independent_85_4": "Independent_85_4", "Independent_86_1": "Independent_86_1", "Independent_86_2": "Independent_86_2", "Independent_87_1": "Independent_87_1", "Independent_88_1": "Independent_88_1", "Independent_88_2": "Independent_88_2", "Independent_88_3": "Independent_88_3", "Independent_88_4": "Independent_88_4", "Independent_88_5": "Independent_88_5", "Independent_88_6": "Independent_88_6", "Independent_88_7": "Independent_88_7", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_89_2": "Independent_89_2", "Independent_89_3": "Independent_89_3", "Independent_89_4": "Independent_89_4", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "Independent_8_3": "Independent_8_3", "Independent_8_4": "Independent_8_4", "Independent_90_1": "Independent_90_1", "Independent_90_2": "Independent_90_2", "Independent_90_3": "Independent_90_3", "Independent_90_4": "Independent_90_4", "Independent_90_5": "Independent_90_5", "Independent_91_1": "Independent_91_1", "Independent_91_2": "Independent_91_2", "Independent_91_3": "Independent_91_3", "Independent_91_4": "Independent_91_4", "Independent_92_1": "Independent_92_1", "Independent_92_2": "Independent_92_2", "Independent_93_1": "Independent_93_1", "Independent_93_10": "Independent_93_10", "Independent_93_11": "Independent_93_11", "Independent_93_2": "Independent_93_2", "Independent_93_3": "Independent_93_3", "Independent_93_4": "Independent_93_4", "Independent_93_5": "Independent_93_5", "Independent_93_6": "Independent_93_6", "Independent_93_7": "Independent_93_7", "Independent_93_8": "Independent_93_8", "Independent_93_9": "Independent_93_9", "Independent_94_1": "Independent_94_1", "Independent_94_2": "Independent_94_2", "Independent_94_3": "Independent_94_3", "Independent_94_4": "Independent_94_4", "Independent_94_5": "Independent_94_5", "Independent_95_1": "Independent_95_1", "Independent_95_2": "Independent_95_2", "Independent_95_3": "Independent_95_3", "Independent_95_4": "Independent_95_4", "Independent_95_5": "Independent_95_5", "Independent_95_6": "Independent_95_6", "Independent_95_7": "Independent_95_7", "Independent_95_8": "Independent_95_8", "Independent_96_1": "Independent_96_1", "Independent_96_2": "Independent_96_2", "Independent_97_1": "Independent_97_1", "Independent_97_2": "Independent_97_2", "Independent_97_3": "Independent_97_3", "Independent_97_4": "Independent_97_4", "Independent_97_5": "Independent_97_5", "Independent_98_1": "Independent_98_1", "Independent_98_2": "Independent_98_2", "Independent_98_3": "Independent_98_3", "Independent_98_4": "Independent_98_4", "Independent_99_1": "Independent_99_1", "Independent_99_2": "Independent_99_2", "Independent_99_3": "Independent_99_3", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "Independent_9_2": "Independent_9_2", "Independent_9_3": "Independent_9_3", "Independent_9_4": "Independent_9_4", "Independent_9_5": "Independent_9_5", "JAPL": "JAPL", "JDP": "JDP", "JDR": "JDR", "JD_U": "JD_U", "JHD": "JHD", "JHP": "JHP", "JHSPT": "JHSPT", "JKM": "JKM", "JKNPP": "JKNPP", "JMM": "JMM", "JPS": "JPS", "JRVP": "JRVP", "KS": "KS", "KSJP": "KSJP", "KSVP": "KSVP", "KVD": "KVD", "LAD": "LAD", "LD": "LD", "LJP": "LJP", "LKJP": "LKJP", "LKSE": "LKSE", "LPSP": "LPSP", "LSD": "LSD", "LSSP": "LSSP", "LTSD": "LTSD", "MAJP": "MAJP", "MANJP": "MANJP", "MCPI": "MCPI", "MOSP": "MOSP", "MVM": "MVM", "NADP": "NADP", "NALP": "NALP", "NATP": "NATP", "NCP": "NCP", "NJP": "NJP", "NJPI": "NJPI", "NOTA": "NOTA", "NPEP": "NPEP", "NTP": "NTP", "NYP": "NYP", "PBI": "PBI", "PMP": "PMP", "PMS": "PMS", "PRRP": "PRRP", "RAHM": "RAHM", "RAIP": "RAIP", "RAJPA": "RAJPA", "RAVP": "RAVP", "RGD": "RGD", "RJD": "RJD", "RJJM": "RJJM", "RJNJNP": "RJNJNP", "RJPD": "RJPD", "RJPTY": "RJPTY", "RKSP": "RKSP", "RMEP": "RMEP", "RMGP": "RMGP", "RPI": "RPI", "RPI_A": "RPI_A", "RPP": "RPP", "RSADP": "RSADP", "RSHJP": "RSHJP", "RSJNP": "RSJNP", "RSMD": "RSMD", "RSP": "RSP", "RSPTY": "RSPTY", "RSWD": "RSWD", "RVNP": "RVNP", "RYP": "RYP", "SAAFP": "SAAFP", "SABJAN": "SABJAN", "SABP": "SABP", "SAKD": "SAKD", "SAP": "SAP", "SASAPT": "SASAPT", "SBSP": "SBSP", "SDPI": "SDPI", "SHD": "SHD", "SHS": "SHS", "SJDD": "SJDD", "SKLP": "SKLP", "SOJP": "SOJP", "SP": "SP", "SPL": "SPL", "SP_I": "SP_I", "SSD": "SSD", "SUCI": "SUCI", "SWAP": "SWAP", "SWSP": "SWSP", "TNRMPI": "TNRMPI", "VIP": "VIP", "VKAM": "VKAM", "pms": "pms"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 243, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 243, "cast_gt_registered": 243}, "n_stations_flagged": 243, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:40:19.718561", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.604, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.56, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.543, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.417, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.069, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.314, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.323, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.543, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.417, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.417, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.318, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.66, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.616, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.658, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 243}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "565f5735eb5340659230679382b8937d", "name": "India 2016 local (overnight india_tamil_nadu_2016_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2016, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Tamil_Nadu/Tamil_Nadu_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ADMK": "ADMK", "DMK": "DMK", "PMK": "PMK", "DMDK": "DMDK", "BJP": "BJP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "BSP": "BSP", "NTK": "NTK", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "YSP": "YSP", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "Independent_1_3": "Independent_1_3", "Independent_1_4": "Independent_1_4", "Independent_1_5": "Independent_1_5", "Independent_1_6": "Independent_1_6", "GOKMK": "GOKMK", "VCK": "VCK", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "Independent_2_3": "Independent_2_3", "Independent_2_4": "Independent_2_4", "Independent_2_5": "Independent_2_5", "Independent_2_6": "Independent_2_6", "INC": "INC", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "Independent_3_3": "Independent_3_3", "Independent_3_4": "Independent_3_4", "Independent_3_5": "Independent_3_5", "Independent_3_6": "Independent_3_6", "Independent_3_7": "Independent_3_7", "Independent_3_8": "Independent_3_8", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "VBMP": "VBMP", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "LJP": "LJP", "Independent_4_4": "Independent_4_4", "Independent_4_5": "Independent_4_5", "Independent_4_6": "Independent_4_6", "VTIP": "VTIP", "Independent_4_7": "Independent_4_7", "Independent_4_8": "Independent_4_8", "Independent_4_9": "Independent_4_9", "Independent_4_10": "Independent_4_10", "Independent_4_11": "Independent_4_11", "MDMK": "MDMK", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "SHS": "SHS", "Independent_5_2": "Independent_5_2", "Independent_5_3": "Independent_5_3", "Independent_5_4": "Independent_5_4", "Independent_5_5": "Independent_5_5", "Independent_5_6": "Independent_5_6", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "Independent_6_2": "Independent_6_2", "Independent_6_3": "Independent_6_3", "Independent_6_4": "Independent_6_4", "Independent_6_5": "Independent_6_5", "Independent_6_6": "Independent_6_6", "Independent_6_7": "Independent_6_7", "Independent_6_8": "Independent_6_8", "Independent_6_9": "Independent_6_9", "Independent_6_10": "Independent_6_10", "Independent_6_11": "Independent_6_11", "Independent_6_12": "Independent_6_12", "SAP": "SAP", "CPM": "CPM", "IJK": "IJK", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "Independent_7_2": "Independent_7_2", "KMDK": "KMDK", "Independent_7_3": "Independent_7_3", "Independent_7_4": "Independent_7_4", "Independent_7_5": "Independent_7_5", "NCP": "NCP", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "Independent_8_3": "Independent_8_3", "Independent_8_4": "Independent_8_4", "Independent_8_5": "Independent_8_5", "Independent_8_6": "Independent_8_6", "Independent_8_7": "Independent_8_7", "Independent_8_8": "Independent_8_8", "Independent_8_9": "Independent_8_9", "Independent_8_10": "Independent_8_10", "Independent_8_11": "Independent_8_11", "VTK": "VTK", "Independent_8_12": "Independent_8_12", "Independent_8_13": "Independent_8_13", "Independent_8_14": "Independent_8_14", "PPIS": "PPIS", "Independent_8_15": "Independent_8_15", "CPI": "CPI", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "FIP": "FIP", "Independent_9_2": "Independent_9_2", "Independent_9_3": "Independent_9_3", "Independent_9_4": "Independent_9_4", "Independent_9_5": "Independent_9_5", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "Independent_10_3": "Independent_10_3", "Independent_10_4": "Independent_10_4", "Independent_10_5": "Independent_10_5", "Independent_10_6": "Independent_10_6", "Independent_10_7": "Independent_10_7", "Independent_10_8": "Independent_10_8", "Independent_10_9": "Independent_10_9", "Independent_10_10": "Independent_10_10", "Independent_10_11": "Independent_10_11", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "Independent_11_3": "Independent_11_3", "Independent_11_4": "Independent_11_4", "Independent_11_5": "Independent_11_5", "SUCI": "SUCI", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "Independent_11_6": "Independent_11_6", "Independent_11_7": "Independent_11_7", "Independent_11_8": "Independent_11_8", "Independent_11_9": "Independent_11_9", "Independent_11_10": "Independent_11_10", "Independent_11_11": "Independent_11_11", "Independent_11_12": "Independent_11_12", "Independent_11_13": "Independent_11_13", "Independent_11_14": "Independent_11_14", "Independent_11_15": "Independent_11_15", "Independent_11_16": "Independent_11_16", "Independent_11_17": "Independent_11_17", "Independent_11_18": "Independent_11_18", "Independent_11_19": "Independent_11_19", "Independent_11_20": "Independent_11_20", "Independent_11_21": "Independent_11_21", "AUK": "AUK", "JJ": "JJ", "Independent_11_22": "Independent_11_22", "Independent_11_23": "Independent_11_23", "MKAT": "MKAT", "Independent_11_24": "Independent_11_24", "Independent_11_25": "Independent_11_25", "Independent_11_26": "Independent_11_26", "Independent_11_27": "Independent_11_27", "Independent_11_28": "Independent_11_28", "Independent_11_29": "Independent_11_29", "Independent_11_30": "Independent_11_30", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "Independent_12_3": "Independent_12_3", "Independent_12_4": "Independent_12_4", "Independent_12_5": "Independent_12_5", "Independent_12_6": "Independent_12_6", "Independent_12_7": "Independent_12_7", "Independent_12_8": "Independent_12_8", "Independent_12_9": "Independent_12_9", "Independent_12_10": "Independent_12_10", "Independent_12_11": "Independent_12_11", "Independent_12_12": "Independent_12_12", "Independent_12_13": "Independent_12_13", "Independent_12_14": "Independent_12_14", "Independent_12_15": "Independent_12_15", "Independent_12_16": "Independent_12_16", "Independent_12_17": "Independent_12_17", "AIWUP": "AIWUP", "Independent_12_18": "Independent_12_18", "Independent_12_19": "Independent_12_19", "Independent_12_20": "Independent_12_20", "Independent_12_21": "Independent_12_21", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "Independent_13_3": "Independent_13_3", "Independent_13_4": "Independent_13_4", "Independent_13_5": "Independent_13_5", "Independent_13_6": "Independent_13_6", "Independent_13_7": "Independent_13_7", "Independent_13_8": "Independent_13_8", "Independent_13_9": "Independent_13_9", "Independent_13_10": "Independent_13_10", "Independent_13_11": "Independent_13_11", "Independent_13_12": "Independent_13_12", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "Independent_14_3": "Independent_14_3", "Independent_14_4": "Independent_14_4", "Independent_14_5": "Independent_14_5", "Independent_14_6": "Independent_14_6", "Independent_14_7": "Independent_14_7", "Independent_14_8": "Independent_14_8", "SDPI": "SDPI", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_15_2": "Independent_15_2", "Independent_15_3": "Independent_15_3", "Independent_15_4": "Independent_15_4", "Independent_15_5": "Independent_15_5", "Independent_15_6": "Independent_15_6", "Independent_15_7": "Independent_15_7", "Independent_15_8": "Independent_15_8", "Independent_15_9": "Independent_15_9", "Independent_15_10": "Independent_15_10", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_16_2": "Independent_16_2", "Independent_16_3": "Independent_16_3", "Independent_16_4": "Independent_16_4", "Independent_16_5": "Independent_16_5", "JASD": "JASD", "Independent_16_6": "Independent_16_6", "Independent_16_7": "Independent_16_7", "Independent_16_8": "Independent_16_8", "Independent_16_9": "Independent_16_9", "Independent_16_10": "Independent_16_10", "TMC(M)": "TMC(M)", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "Independent_17_3": "Independent_17_3", "Independent_17_4": "Independent_17_4", "Independent_17_5": "Independent_17_5", "Independent_17_6": "Independent_17_6", "Independent_17_7": "Independent_17_7", "Independent_17_8": "Independent_17_8", "Independent_17_9": "Independent_17_9", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_18_3": "Independent_18_3", "Independent_18_4": "Independent_18_4", "Independent_18_5": "Independent_18_5", "GMI": "GMI", "Independent_18_6": "Independent_18_6", "DMSK": "DMSK", "Independent_18_7": "Independent_18_7", "Independent_18_8": "Independent_18_8", "Independent_18_9": "Independent_18_9", "Independent_18_10": "Independent_18_10", "Independent_18_11": "Independent_18_11", "Independent_18_12": "Independent_18_12", "Independent_18_13": "Independent_18_13", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "Independent_19_3": "Independent_19_3", "Independent_19_4": "Independent_19_4", "Independent_19_5": "Independent_19_5", "Independent_19_6": "Independent_19_6", "EDP": "EDP", "Independent_19_7": "Independent_19_7", "Independent_19_8": "Independent_19_8", "Independent_19_9": "Independent_19_9", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_20_2": "Independent_20_2", "Independent_20_3": "Independent_20_3", "Independent_20_4": "Independent_20_4", "Independent_20_5": "Independent_20_5", "Independent_20_6": "Independent_20_6", "Independent_20_7": "Independent_20_7", "Independent_20_8": "Independent_20_8", "Independent_20_9": "Independent_20_9", "Independent_20_10": "Independent_20_10", "Independent_20_11": "Independent_20_11", "Independent_20_12": "Independent_20_12", "Independent_20_13": "Independent_20_13", "Independent_20_14": "Independent_20_14", "Independent_20_15": "Independent_20_15", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_21_2": "Independent_21_2", "CDF": "CDF", "Independent_21_3": "Independent_21_3", "Independent_21_4": "Independent_21_4", "TSC": "TSC", "Independent_21_5": "Independent_21_5", "Independent_21_6": "Independent_21_6", "Independent_21_7": "Independent_21_7", "Independent_21_8": "Independent_21_8", "Independent_21_9": "Independent_21_9", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_22_2": "Independent_22_2", "Independent_22_3": "Independent_22_3", "Independent_22_4": "Independent_22_4", "Independent_22_5": "Independent_22_5", "Independent_22_6": "Independent_22_6", "Independent_22_7": "Independent_22_7", "Independent_22_8": "Independent_22_8", "Independent_22_9": "Independent_22_9", "Independent_22_10": "Independent_22_10", "Independent_22_11": "Independent_22_11", "Independent_22_12": "Independent_22_12", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_23_2": "Independent_23_2", "Independent_23_3": "Independent_23_3", "Independent_23_4": "Independent_23_4", "Independent_23_5": "Independent_23_5", "Independent_23_6": "Independent_23_6", "Independent_23_7": "Independent_23_7", "Independent_23_8": "Independent_23_8", "Independent_23_9": "Independent_23_9", "Independent_23_10": "Independent_23_10", "Independent_23_11": "Independent_23_11", "Independent_23_12": "Independent_23_12", "Independent_23_13": "Independent_23_13", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "Independent_24_2": "Independent_24_2", "Independent_24_3": "Independent_24_3", "Independent_24_4": "Independent_24_4", "Independent_24_5": "Independent_24_5", "Independent_24_6": "Independent_24_6", "Independent_24_7": "Independent_24_7", "Independent_24_8": "Independent_24_8", "Independent_24_9": "Independent_24_9", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "Independent_25_4": "Independent_25_4", "Independent_25_5": "Independent_25_5", "Independent_25_6": "Independent_25_6", "Independent_25_7": "Independent_25_7", "Independent_25_8": "Independent_25_8", "Independent_25_9": "Independent_25_9", "Independent_25_10": "Independent_25_10", "Independent_25_11": "Independent_25_11", "Independent_25_12": "Independent_25_12", "Independent_25_13": "Independent_25_13", "Independent_25_14": "Independent_25_14", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "Independent_26_3": "Independent_26_3", "GAPP": "GAPP", "Independent_26_4": "Independent_26_4", "Independent_26_5": "Independent_26_5", "Independent_26_6": "Independent_26_6", "Independent_26_7": "Independent_26_7", "MMKA": "MMKA", "Independent_26_8": "Independent_26_8", "Independent_26_9": "Independent_26_9", "Independent_26_10": "Independent_26_10", "Independent_26_11": "Independent_26_11", "Independent_26_12": "Independent_26_12", "Independent_26_13": "Independent_26_13", "Independent_26_14": "Independent_26_14", "Independent_26_15": "Independent_26_15", "Independent_26_16": "Independent_26_16", "Independent_26_17": "Independent_26_17", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "Independent_27_3": "Independent_27_3", "Independent_27_4": "Independent_27_4", "Independent_27_5": "Independent_27_5", "Independent_27_6": "Independent_27_6", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "Independent_28_4": "Independent_28_4", "Independent_28_5": "Independent_28_5", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "Independent_29_4": "Independent_29_4", "Independent_29_5": "Independent_29_5", "Independent_29_6": "Independent_29_6", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "THP": "THP", "Independent_30_3": "Independent_30_3", "Independent_30_4": "Independent_30_4", "Independent_30_5": "Independent_30_5", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_31_2": "Independent_31_2", "Independent_31_3": "Independent_31_3", "Independent_31_4": "Independent_31_4", "Independent_31_5": "Independent_31_5", "Independent_31_6": "Independent_31_6", "Independent_31_7": "Independent_31_7", "Independent_31_8": "Independent_31_8", "Independent_31_9": "Independent_31_9", "Independent_31_10": "Independent_31_10", "Independent_31_11": "Independent_31_11", "Independent_31_12": "Independent_31_12", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_32_3": "Independent_32_3", "Independent_32_4": "Independent_32_4", "Independent_32_5": "Independent_32_5", "Independent_32_6": "Independent_32_6", "Independent_32_7": "Independent_32_7", "AIJMK": "AIJMK", "Independent_32_8": "Independent_32_8", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "Independent_33_4": "Independent_33_4", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_34_3": "Independent_34_3", "Independent_34_4": "Independent_34_4", "Independent_34_5": "Independent_34_5", "AIPMK": "AIPMK", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "Independent_35_2": "Independent_35_2", "Independent_35_3": "Independent_35_3", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_36_3": "Independent_36_3", "Independent_36_4": "Independent_36_4", "Independent_36_5": "Independent_36_5", "SP": "SP", "Independent_36_6": "Independent_36_6", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "Independent_37_3": "Independent_37_3", "Independent_37_4": "Independent_37_4", "Independent_37_5": "Independent_37_5", "Independent_37_6": "Independent_37_6", "Independent_37_7": "Independent_37_7", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_38_3": "Independent_38_3", "Independent_38_4": "Independent_38_4", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_39_2": "Independent_39_2", "Independent_39_3": "Independent_39_3", "Independent_39_4": "Independent_39_4", "Independent_39_5": "Independent_39_5", "Independent_39_6": "Independent_39_6", "Independent_39_7": "Independent_39_7", "Independent_39_8": "Independent_39_8", "Independent_39_9": "Independent_39_9", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_40_3": "Independent_40_3", "Independent_40_4": "Independent_40_4", "Independent_40_5": "Independent_40_5", "Independent_40_6": "Independent_40_6", "Independent_40_7": "Independent_40_7", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "Independent_41_3": "Independent_41_3", "Independent_41_4": "Independent_41_4", "Independent_41_5": "Independent_41_5", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_42_2": "Independent_42_2", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_43_2": "Independent_43_2", "Independent_43_3": "Independent_43_3", "Independent_43_4": "Independent_43_4", "Independent_43_5": "Independent_43_5", "Independent_43_6": "Independent_43_6", "Independent_43_7": "Independent_43_7", "Independent_43_8": "Independent_43_8", "APNP": "APNP", "Independent_43_9": "Independent_43_9", "Independent_43_10": "Independent_43_10", "Independent_43_11": "Independent_43_11", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "Independent_44_3": "Independent_44_3", "UMK": "UMK", "Independent_44_4": "Independent_44_4", "Independent_44_5": "Independent_44_5", "Independent_44_6": "Independent_44_6", "NMK": "NMK", "GPI": "GPI", "Independent_44_7": "Independent_44_7", "Independent_44_8": "Independent_44_8", "Independent_44_9": "Independent_44_9", "Independent_44_10": "Independent_44_10", "RSPS": "RSPS", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_45_2": "Independent_45_2", "Independent_45_3": "Independent_45_3", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "Independent_46_3": "Independent_46_3", "Independent_46_4": "Independent_46_4", "Independent_46_5": "Independent_46_5", "IUML": "IUML", "AIMIM": "AIMIM", "WPOI": "WPOI", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "Independent_47_3": "Independent_47_3", "Independent_47_4": "Independent_47_4", "MAMAK": "MAMAK", "SUNP": "SUNP", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_48_2": "Independent_48_2", "Independent_48_3": "Independent_48_3", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "Independent_49_3": "Independent_49_3", "Independent_49_4": "Independent_49_4", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_50_3": "Independent_50_3", "Independent_50_4": "Independent_50_4", "Independent_50_5": "Independent_50_5", "Independent_50_6": "Independent_50_6", "UCPI": "UCPI", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "Independent_52_3": "Independent_52_3", "Independent_52_4": "Independent_52_4", "PTK": "PTK", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "Independent_53_2": "Independent_53_2", "Independent_53_3": "Independent_53_3", "Independent_53_4": "Independent_53_4", "Independent_53_5": "Independent_53_5", "Independent_53_6": "Independent_53_6", "Independent_53_7": "Independent_53_7", "FDLP": "FDLP", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_54_3": "Independent_54_3", "Independent_54_4": "Independent_54_4", "Independent_54_5": "Independent_54_5", "Independent_54_6": "Independent_54_6", "Independent_54_7": "Independent_54_7", "RPSN": "RPSN", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_55_2": "Independent_55_2", "Independent_55_3": "Independent_55_3", "Independent_55_4": "Independent_55_4", "Independent_55_5": "Independent_55_5", "Independent_55_6": "Independent_55_6", "Independent_55_7": "Independent_55_7", "Independent_55_8": "Independent_55_8", "Independent_55_9": "Independent_55_9", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_56_2": "Independent_56_2", "Independent_56_3": "Independent_56_3", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "TMK": "TMK", "Independent_57_2": "Independent_57_2", "Independent_57_3": "Independent_57_3", "Independent_57_4": "Independent_57_4", "Independent_57_5": "Independent_57_5", "Independent_58_1": "Independent_58_1", "Independent_58_2": "Independent_58_2", "Independent_58_3": "Independent_58_3", "Independent_58_4": "Independent_58_4", "Independent_58_5": "Independent_58_5", "Independent_58_6": "Independent_58_6", "Independent_58_7": "Independent_58_7", "JD(S)": "JD(S)", "Independent_58_8": "Independent_58_8", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_59_2": "Independent_59_2", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "Independent_60_3": "Independent_60_3", "Independent_60_4": "Independent_60_4", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "Independent_61_3": "Independent_61_3", "Independent_61_4": "Independent_61_4", "Independent_61_5": "Independent_61_5", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_62_3": "Independent_62_3", "Independent_62_4": "Independent_62_4", "Independent_62_5": "Independent_62_5", "VVIP": "VVIP", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "Independent_63_3": "Independent_63_3", "Independent_63_4": "Independent_63_4", "Independent_63_5": "Independent_63_5", "Independent_63_6": "Independent_63_6", "Independent_63_7": "Independent_63_7", "Independent_63_8": "Independent_63_8", "Independent_63_9": "Independent_63_9", "Independent_63_10": "Independent_63_10", "Independent_63_11": "Independent_63_11", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_64_2": "Independent_64_2", "Independent_64_3": "Independent_64_3", "Independent_64_4": "Independent_64_4", "Independent_64_5": "Independent_64_5", "Independent_64_6": "Independent_64_6", "Independent_64_7": "Independent_64_7", "Independent_64_8": "Independent_64_8", "Independent_64_9": "Independent_64_9", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_65_2": "Independent_65_2", "Independent_65_3": "Independent_65_3", "Independent_65_4": "Independent_65_4", "Independent_65_5": "Independent_65_5", "Independent_65_6": "Independent_65_6", "Independent_65_7": "Independent_65_7", "Independent_65_8": "Independent_65_8", "Independent_65_9": "Independent_65_9", "Independent_65_10": "Independent_65_10", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_66_2": "Independent_66_2", "Independent_66_3": "Independent_66_3", "Independent_66_4": "Independent_66_4", "Independent_66_5": "Independent_66_5", "Independent_66_6": "Independent_66_6", "RPI": "RPI", "Independent_66_7": "Independent_66_7", "Independent_67_1": "Independent_67_1", "Independent_67_2": "Independent_67_2", "Independent_67_3": "Independent_67_3", "Independent_67_4": "Independent_67_4", "Independent_67_5": "Independent_67_5", "Independent_67_6": "Independent_67_6", "Independent_67_7": "Independent_67_7", "Independent_67_8": "Independent_67_8", "Independent_67_9": "Independent_67_9", "Independent_67_10": "Independent_67_10", "Independent_67_11": "Independent_67_11", "SASP": "SASP", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "Independent_68_3": "Independent_68_3", "Independent_68_4": "Independent_68_4", "Independent_68_5": "Independent_68_5", "Independent_68_6": "Independent_68_6", "Independent_68_7": "Independent_68_7", "Independent_68_8": "Independent_68_8", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_69_3": "Independent_69_3", "Independent_69_4": "Independent_69_4", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "Independent_70_2": "Independent_70_2", "Independent_70_3": "Independent_70_3", "Independent_70_4": "Independent_70_4", "Independent_70_5": "Independent_70_5", "Independent_70_6": "Independent_70_6", "Independent_70_7": "Independent_70_7", "Independent_71_1": "Independent_71_1", "Independent_71_2": "Independent_71_2", "Independent_71_3": "Independent_71_3", "Independent_71_4": "Independent_71_4", "Independent_71_5": "Independent_71_5", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_72_2": "Independent_72_2", "Independent_72_3": "Independent_72_3", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_74_2": "Independent_74_2", "Independent_74_3": "Independent_74_3", "Independent_74_4": "Independent_74_4", "Independent_74_5": "Independent_74_5", "Independent_74_6": "Independent_74_6", "Independent_74_7": "Independent_74_7", "Independent_74_8": "Independent_74_8", "Independent_74_9": "Independent_74_9", "Independent_74_10": "Independent_74_10", "Independent_74_11": "Independent_74_11", "Independent_74_12": "Independent_74_12", "Independent_74_13": "Independent_74_13", "Independent_74_14": "Independent_74_14", "Independent_74_15": "Independent_74_15", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_75_2": "Independent_75_2", "Independent_75_3": "Independent_75_3", "Independent_75_4": "Independent_75_4", "Independent_75_5": "Independent_75_5", "Independent_75_6": "Independent_75_6", "Independent_75_7": "Independent_75_7", "Independent_75_8": "Independent_75_8", "Independent_75_9": "Independent_75_9", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_76_3": "Independent_76_3", "Independent_76_4": "Independent_76_4", "Independent_76_5": "Independent_76_5", "Independent_76_6": "Independent_76_6", "Independent_76_7": "Independent_76_7", "Independent_76_8": "Independent_76_8", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_77_2": "Independent_77_2", "Independent_77_3": "Independent_77_3", "Independent_77_4": "Independent_77_4", "Independent_77_5": "Independent_77_5", "Independent_77_6": "Independent_77_6", "Independent_77_7": "Independent_77_7", "Independent_77_8": "Independent_77_8", "Independent_77_9": "Independent_77_9", "Independent_77_10": "Independent_77_10", "Independent_77_11": "Independent_77_11", "Independent_77_12": "Independent_77_12", "Independent_77_13": "Independent_77_13", "Independent_77_14": "Independent_77_14", "Independent_77_15": "Independent_77_15", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_78_2": "Independent_78_2", "Independent_78_3": "Independent_78_3", "Independent_78_4": "Independent_78_4", "Independent_78_5": "Independent_78_5", "Independent_78_6": "Independent_78_6", "Independent_78_7": "Independent_78_7", "Independent_78_8": "Independent_78_8", "Independent_78_9": "Independent_78_9", "Independent_78_10": "Independent_78_10", "Independent_79_1": "Independent_79_1", "Independent_79_2": "Independent_79_2", "Independent_79_3": "Independent_79_3", "Independent_79_4": "Independent_79_4", "Independent_79_5": "Independent_79_5", "Independent_79_6": "Independent_79_6", "Independent_79_7": "Independent_79_7", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_80_2": "Independent_80_2", "Independent_80_3": "Independent_80_3", "Independent_80_4": "Independent_80_4", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "Independent_81_2": "Independent_81_2", "Independent_81_3": "Independent_81_3", "Independent_81_4": "Independent_81_4", "Independent_81_5": "Independent_81_5", "Independent_81_6": "Independent_81_6", "Independent_82_1": "Independent_82_1", "Independent_82_2": "Independent_82_2", "Independent_82_3": "Independent_82_3", "Independent_82_4": "Independent_82_4", "Independent_82_5": "Independent_82_5", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_83_2": "Independent_83_2", "Independent_83_3": "Independent_83_3", "Independent_83_4": "Independent_83_4", "Independent_83_5": "Independent_83_5", "Independent_83_6": "Independent_83_6", "Independent_84_1": "Independent_84_1", "Independent_84_2": "Independent_84_2", "Independent_84_3": "Independent_84_3", "Independent_84_4": "Independent_84_4", "Independent_84_5": "Independent_84_5", "Independent_84_6": "Independent_84_6", "Independent_84_7": "Independent_84_7", "Independent_84_8": "Independent_84_8", "Independent_84_9": "Independent_84_9", "Independent_84_10": "Independent_84_10", "Independent_85_1": "Independent_85_1", "Independent_85_2": "Independent_85_2", "Independent_85_3": "Independent_85_3", "Independent_85_4": "Independent_85_4", "Independent_85_5": "Independent_85_5", "Independent_85_6": "Independent_85_6", "Independent_85_7": "Independent_85_7", "Independent_85_8": "Independent_85_8", "Independent_85_9": "Independent_85_9", "Independent_85_10": "Independent_85_10", "Independent_85_11": "Independent_85_11", "Independent_85_12": "Independent_85_12", "Independent_85_13": "Independent_85_13", "Independent_86_1": "Independent_86_1", "Independent_86_2": "Independent_86_2", "Independent_86_3": "Independent_86_3", "Independent_86_4": "Independent_86_4", "Independent_86_5": "Independent_86_5", "Independent_86_6": "Independent_86_6", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "Independent_87_1": "Independent_87_1", "Independent_87_2": "Independent_87_2", "Independent_87_3": "Independent_87_3", "Independent_87_4": "Independent_87_4", "Independent_87_5": "Independent_87_5", "Independent_87_6": "Independent_87_6", "Independent_87_7": "Independent_87_7", "Independent_88_1": "Independent_88_1", "Independent_88_2": "Independent_88_2", "Independent_88_3": "Independent_88_3", "Independent_88_4": "Independent_88_4", "Independent_88_5": "Independent_88_5", "Independent_88_6": "Independent_88_6", "Independent_88_7": "Independent_88_7", "Independent_88_8": "Independent_88_8", "Independent_88_9": "Independent_88_9", "Independent_88_10": "Independent_88_10", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_89_2": "Independent_89_2", "Independent_89_3": "Independent_89_3", "Independent_89_4": "Independent_89_4", "Independent_89_5": "Independent_89_5", "Independent_89_6": "Independent_89_6", "Independent_89_7": "Independent_89_7", "Independent_89_8": "Independent_89_8", "Independent_89_9": "Independent_89_9", "Independent_89_10": "Independent_89_10", "Independent_90_1": "Independent_90_1", "Independent_90_2": "Independent_90_2", "Independent_90_3": "Independent_90_3", "Independent_90_4": "Independent_90_4", "Independent_90_5": "Independent_90_5", "Independent_90_6": "Independent_90_6", "Independent_90_7": "Independent_90_7", "Independent_90_8": "Independent_90_8", "Independent_90_9": "Independent_90_9", "Independent_91_1": "Independent_91_1", "Independent_91_2": "Independent_91_2", "Independent_91_3": "Independent_91_3", "Independent_91_4": "Independent_91_4", "Independent_91_5": "Independent_91_5", "Independent_91_6": "Independent_91_6", "Independent_91_7": "Independent_91_7", "Independent_92_1": "Independent_92_1", "Independent_92_2": "Independent_92_2", "Independent_92_3": "Independent_92_3", "Independent_92_4": "Independent_92_4", "Independent_93_1": "Independent_93_1", "Independent_93_2": "Independent_93_2", "Independent_93_3": "Independent_93_3", "Independent_94_1": "Independent_94_1", "Independent_94_2": "Independent_94_2", "Independent_94_3": "Independent_94_3", "Independent_94_4": "Independent_94_4", "Independent_94_5": "Independent_94_5", "Independent_94_6": "Independent_94_6", "Independent_95_1": "Independent_95_1", "Independent_95_2": "Independent_95_2", "Independent_95_3": "Independent_95_3", "Independent_95_4": "Independent_95_4", "Independent_95_5": "Independent_95_5", "Independent_95_6": "Independent_95_6", "Independent_95_7": "Independent_95_7", "Independent_95_8": "Independent_95_8", "Independent_95_9": "Independent_95_9", "Independent_95_10": "Independent_95_10", "Independent_95_11": "Independent_95_11", "Independent_96_1": "Independent_96_1", "Independent_96_2": "Independent_96_2", "Independent_96_3": "Independent_96_3", "Independent_96_4": "Independent_96_4", "Independent_96_5": "Independent_96_5", "Independent_96_6": "Independent_96_6", "Independent_96_7": "Independent_96_7", "Independent_96_8": "Independent_96_8", "Independent_96_9": "Independent_96_9", "Independent_96_10": "Independent_96_10", "Independent_96_11": "Independent_96_11", "Independent_96_12": "Independent_96_12", "Independent_96_13": "Independent_96_13", "Independent_96_14": "Independent_96_14", "Independent_96_15": "Independent_96_15", "Independent_97_1": "Independent_97_1", "Independent_97_2": "Independent_97_2", "Independent_97_3": "Independent_97_3", "Independent_97_4": "Independent_97_4", "Independent_97_5": "Independent_97_5", "Independent_97_6": "Independent_97_6", "Independent_97_7": "Independent_97_7", "Independent_97_8": "Independent_97_8", "Independent_97_9": "Independent_97_9", "Independent_97_10": "Independent_97_10", "Independent_97_11": "Independent_97_11", "Independent_97_12": "Independent_97_12", "Independent_97_13": "Independent_97_13", "Independent_97_14": "Independent_97_14", "Independent_98_1": "Independent_98_1", "Independent_98_2": "Independent_98_2", "SMK": "SMK", "Independent_99_1": "Independent_99_1", "Independent_99_2": "Independent_99_2", "Independent_99_3": "Independent_99_3", "IDMMK": "IDMMK", "Independent_99_4": "Independent_99_4", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_100_2": "Independent_100_2", "Independent_100_3": "Independent_100_3", "Independent_101_1": "Independent_101_1", "Independent_101_2": "Independent_101_2", "Independent_101_3": "Independent_101_3", "Independent_101_4": "Independent_101_4", "TMMK": "TMMK", "Independent_102_1": "Independent_102_1", "Independent_102_2": "Independent_102_2", "Independent_102_3": "Independent_102_3", "Independent_102_4": "Independent_102_4", "Independent_102_5": "Independent_102_5", "Independent_102_6": "Independent_102_6", "Independent_102_7": "Independent_102_7", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_103_2": "Independent_103_2", "Independent_103_3": "Independent_103_3", "Independent_103_4": "Independent_103_4", "Independent_103_5": "Independent_103_5", "Independent_103_6": "Independent_103_6", "Independent_103_7": "Independent_103_7", "Independent_103_8": "Independent_103_8", "Independent_103_9": "Independent_103_9", "INMMK": "INMMK", "Independent_104_1": "Independent_104_1", "Independent_104_2": "Independent_104_2", "Independent_105_1": "Independent_105_1", "Independent_105_2": "Independent_105_2", "Independent_105_3": "Independent_105_3", "Independent_105_4": "Independent_105_4", "Independent_105_5": "Independent_105_5", "Independent_106_1": "Independent_106_1", "Independent_106_2": "Independent_106_2", "Independent_106_3": "Independent_106_3", "Independent_106_4": "Independent_106_4", "Independent_106_5": "Independent_106_5", "Independent_106_6": "Independent_106_6", "Independent_107_1": "Independent_107_1", "Independent_107_2": "Independent_107_2", "Independent_107_3": "Independent_107_3", "Independent_108_1": "Independent_108_1", "Independent_108_2": "Independent_108_2", "Independent_109_1": "Independent_109_1", "Independent_109_2": "Independent_109_2", "Independent_110_1": "Independent_110_1", "Independent_110_2": "Independent_110_2", "Independent_110_3": "Independent_110_3", "Independent_110_4": "Independent_110_4", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "Independent_111_2": "Independent_111_2", "Independent_111_3": "Independent_111_3", "Independent_111_4": "Independent_111_4", "Independent_111_5": "Independent_111_5", "Independent_111_6": "Independent_111_6", "Independent_111_7": "Independent_111_7", "Independent_112_1": "Independent_112_1", "Independent_112_2": "Independent_112_2", "Independent_112_3": "Independent_112_3", "Independent_113_1": "Independent_113_1", "Independent_113_2": "Independent_113_2", "Independent_113_3": "Independent_113_3", "Independent_113_4": "Independent_113_4", "Independent_113_5": "Independent_113_5", "Independent_113_6": "Independent_113_6", "Independent_113_7": "Independent_113_7", "Independent_113_8": "Independent_113_8", "Independent_113_9": "Independent_113_9", "Independent_114_1": "Independent_114_1", "Independent_114_2": "Independent_114_2", "Independent_114_3": "Independent_114_3", "Independent_114_4": "Independent_114_4", "Independent_114_5": "Independent_114_5", "Independent_114_6": "Independent_114_6", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_115_2": "Independent_115_2", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "Independent_116_2": "Independent_116_2", "AIFB": "AIFB", "Independent_117_1": "Independent_117_1", "Independent_117_2": "Independent_117_2", "Independent_117_3": "Independent_117_3", "Independent_117_4": "Independent_117_4", "Independent_117_5": "Independent_117_5", "Independent_118_1": "Independent_118_1", "Independent_118_2": "Independent_118_2", "Independent_118_3": "Independent_118_3", "Independent_118_4": "Independent_118_4", "Independent_119_1": "Independent_119_1", "Independent_119_2": "Independent_119_2", "Independent_119_3": "Independent_119_3", "Independent_119_4": "Independent_119_4", "Independent_119_5": "Independent_119_5", "Independent_120_1": "Independent_120_1", "Independent_120_2": "Independent_120_2", "Independent_120_3": "Independent_120_3", "Independent_120_4": "Independent_120_4", "Independent_120_5": "Independent_120_5", "Independent_120_6": "Independent_120_6", "Independent_121_1": "Independent_121_1", "Independent_121_2": "Independent_121_2", "Independent_121_3": "Independent_121_3", "Independent_121_4": "Independent_121_4", "Independent_121_5": "Independent_121_5", "Independent_122_1": "Independent_122_1", "Independent_122_2": "Independent_122_2", "Independent_122_3": "Independent_122_3", "Independent_123_1": "Independent_123_1", "Independent_123_2": "Independent_123_2", "Independent_123_3": "Independent_123_3", "Independent_123_4": "Independent_123_4", "Independent_123_5": "Independent_123_5", "Independent_123_6": "Independent_123_6", "Independent_124_1": "Independent_124_1", "Independent_125_1": "Independent_125_1", "Independent_125_2": "Independent_125_2", "Independent_126_1": "Independent_126_1", "Independent_126_2": "Independent_126_2", "Independent_126_3": "Independent_126_3", "Independent_126_4": "Independent_126_4", "Independent_127_1": "Independent_127_1", "Independent_127_2": "Independent_127_2", "Independent_127_3": "Independent_127_3", "Independent_127_4": "Independent_127_4", "Independent_127_5": "Independent_127_5", "Independent_127_6": "Independent_127_6", "Independent_127_7": "Independent_127_7", "Independent_127_8": "Independent_127_8", "Independent_127_9": "Independent_127_9", "Independent_127_10": "Independent_127_10", "ICF": "ICF", "Independent_127_11": "Independent_127_11", "Independent_127_12": "Independent_127_12", "Independent_127_13": "Independent_127_13", "Independent_128_1": "Independent_128_1", "Independent_128_2": "Independent_128_2", "Independent_128_3": "Independent_128_3", "Independent_128_4": "Independent_128_4", "Independent_128_5": "Independent_128_5", "Independent_128_6": "Independent_128_6", "Independent_128_7": "Independent_128_7", "Independent_129_1": "Independent_129_1", "Independent_129_2": "Independent_129_2", "Independent_129_3": "Independent_129_3", "Independent_129_4": "Independent_129_4", "Independent_129_5": "Independent_129_5", "Independent_129_6": "Independent_129_6", "Independent_129_7": "Independent_129_7", "TAVK": "TAVK", "Independent_130_1": "Independent_130_1", "Independent_130_2": "Independent_130_2", "Independent_130_3": "Independent_130_3", "Independent_130_4": "Independent_130_4", "Independent_130_5": "Independent_130_5", "Independent_131_1": "Independent_131_1", "Independent_131_2": "Independent_131_2", "Independent_131_3": "Independent_131_3", "Independent_131_4": "Independent_131_4", "Independent_131_5": "Independent_131_5", "Independent_131_6": "Independent_131_6", "Independent_131_7": "Independent_131_7", "Independent_131_8": "Independent_131_8", "Independent_131_9": "Independent_131_9", "Independent_131_10": "Independent_131_10", "Independent_131_11": "Independent_131_11", "Independent_132_1": "Independent_132_1", "Independent_132_2": "Independent_132_2", "Independent_132_3": "Independent_132_3", "Independent_132_4": "Independent_132_4", "Independent_132_5": "Independent_132_5", "Independent_132_6": "Independent_132_6", "Independent_133_1": "Independent_133_1", "Independent_133_2": "Independent_133_2", "Independent_133_3": "Independent_133_3", "Independent_133_4": "Independent_133_4", "Independent_133_5": "Independent_133_5", "Independent_135_1": "Independent_135_1", "Independent_135_2": "Independent_135_2", "Independent_135_3": "Independent_135_3", "Independent_135_4": "Independent_135_4", "Independent_135_5": "Independent_135_5", "Independent_135_6": "Independent_135_6", "Independent_135_7": "Independent_135_7", "Independent_135_8": "Independent_135_8", "Independent_135_9": "Independent_135_9", "Independent_135_10": "Independent_135_10", "Independent_135_11": "Independent_135_11", "Independent_135_12": "Independent_135_12", "PT": "PT", "Independent_136_1": "Independent_136_1", "Independent_136_2": "Independent_136_2", "Independent_136_3": "Independent_136_3", "Independent_136_4": "Independent_136_4", "Independent_136_5": "Independent_136_5", "Independent_137_1": "Independent_137_1", "Independent_137_2": "Independent_137_2", "Independent_137_3": "Independent_137_3", "Independent_138_1": "Independent_138_1", "AIFB(S)": "AIFB(S)", "Independent_138_2": "Independent_138_2", "ETMK": "ETMK", "Independent_138_3": "Independent_138_3", "AMMK": "AMMK", "Independent_139_1": "Independent_139_1", "Independent_139_2": "Independent_139_2", "Independent_139_3": "Independent_139_3", "Independent_139_4": "Independent_139_4", "Independent_139_5": "Independent_139_5", "Independent_139_6": "Independent_139_6", "Independent_140_1": "Independent_140_1", "Independent_140_2": "Independent_140_2", "Independent_140_3": "Independent_140_3", "Independent_140_4": "Independent_140_4", "Independent_140_5": "Independent_140_5", "Independent_140_6": "Independent_140_6", "Independent_141_1": "Independent_141_1", "Independent_141_2": "Independent_141_2", "Independent_141_3": "Independent_141_3", "Independent_141_4": "Independent_141_4", "Independent_142_1": "Independent_142_1", "Independent_142_2": "Independent_142_2", "Independent_142_3": "Independent_142_3", "Independent_142_4": "Independent_142_4", "Independent_142_5": "Independent_142_5", "Independent_142_6": "Independent_142_6", "Independent_142_7": "Independent_142_7", "Independent_143_1": "Independent_143_1", "Independent_143_2": "Independent_143_2", "Independent_143_3": "Independent_143_3", "Independent_143_4": "Independent_143_4", "Independent_143_5": "Independent_143_5", "Independent_143_6": "Independent_143_6", "Independent_144_1": "Independent_144_1", "Independent_144_2": "Independent_144_2", "Independent_144_3": "Independent_144_3", "Independent_144_4": "Independent_144_4", "Independent_144_5": "Independent_144_5", "Independent_145_1": "Independent_145_1", "Independent_145_2": "Independent_145_2", "Independent_145_3": "Independent_145_3", "Independent_145_4": "Independent_145_4", "Independent_145_5": "Independent_145_5", "Independent_145_6": "Independent_145_6", "Independent_145_7": "Independent_145_7", "Independent_145_8": "Independent_145_8", "Independent_146_1": "Independent_146_1", "Independent_146_2": "Independent_146_2", "Independent_146_3": "Independent_146_3", "Independent_146_4": "Independent_146_4", "Independent_147_1": "Independent_147_1", "Independent_147_2": "Independent_147_2", "Independent_147_3": "Independent_147_3", "Independent_148_1": "Independent_148_1", "Independent_148_2": "Independent_148_2", "Independent_148_3": "Independent_148_3", "Independent_148_4": "Independent_148_4", "Independent_148_5": "Independent_148_5", "Independent_148_6": "Independent_148_6", "Independent_149_1": "Independent_149_1", "Independent_149_2": "Independent_149_2", "Independent_149_3": "Independent_149_3", "Independent_149_4": "Independent_149_4", "Independent_149_5": "Independent_149_5", "Independent_150_1": "Independent_150_1", "Independent_150_2": "Independent_150_2", "Independent_150_3": "Independent_150_3", "Independent_150_4": "Independent_150_4", "Independent_150_5": "Independent_150_5", "Independent_150_6": "Independent_150_6", "Independent_151_1": "Independent_151_1", "Independent_151_2": "Independent_151_2", "Independent_151_3": "Independent_151_3", "Independent_151_4": "Independent_151_4", "Independent_151_5": "Independent_151_5", "Independent_151_6": "Independent_151_6", "Independent_151_7": "Independent_151_7", "Independent_151_8": "Independent_151_8", "Independent_152_1": "Independent_152_1", "Independent_152_2": "Independent_152_2", "Independent_152_3": "Independent_152_3", "Independent_152_4": "Independent_152_4", "Independent_152_5": "Independent_152_5", "Independent_153_1": "Independent_153_1", "Independent_153_2": "Independent_153_2", "Independent_153_3": "Independent_153_3", "Independent_153_4": "Independent_153_4", "Independent_154_1": "Independent_154_1", "Independent_154_2": "Independent_154_2", "Independent_154_3": "Independent_154_3", "Independent_154_4": "Independent_154_4", "Independent_154_5": "Independent_154_5", "Independent_154_6": "Independent_154_6", "Independent_155_1": "Independent_155_1", "Independent_155_2": "Independent_155_2", "Independent_155_3": "Independent_155_3", "Independent_155_4": "Independent_155_4", "Independent_155_5": "Independent_155_5", "Independent_155_6": "Independent_155_6", "Independent_155_7": "Independent_155_7", "Independent_155_8": "Independent_155_8", "Independent_156_1": "Independent_156_1", "Independent_156_2": "Independent_156_2", "Independent_156_3": "Independent_156_3", "Independent_156_4": "Independent_156_4", "Independent_156_5": "Independent_156_5", "Independent_156_6": "Independent_156_6", "Independent_156_7": "Independent_156_7", "Independent_157_1": "Independent_157_1", "Independent_157_2": "Independent_157_2", "Independent_157_3": "Independent_157_3", "Independent_157_4": "Independent_157_4", "Independent_157_5": "Independent_157_5", "Independent_157_6": "Independent_157_6", "Independent_157_7": "Independent_157_7", "Independent_157_8": "Independent_157_8", "Independent_157_9": "Independent_157_9", "Independent_157_10": "Independent_157_10", "Independent_158_1": "Independent_158_1", "Independent_158_2": "Independent_158_2", "Independent_158_3": "Independent_158_3", "Independent_158_4": "Independent_158_4", "Independent_158_5": "Independent_158_5", "Independent_158_6": "Independent_158_6", "Independent_159_1": "Independent_159_1", "Independent_159_2": "Independent_159_2", "Independent_159_3": "Independent_159_3", "Independent_160_1": "Independent_160_1", "Independent_160_2": "Independent_160_2", "Independent_160_3": "Independent_160_3", "Independent_161_1": "Independent_161_1", "Independent_162_1": "Independent_162_1", "Independent_162_2": "Independent_162_2", "Independent_162_3": "Independent_162_3", "Independent_163_1": "Independent_163_1", "Independent_163_2": "Independent_163_2", "Independent_163_3": "Independent_163_3", "Independent_163_4": "Independent_163_4", "Independent_163_5": "Independent_163_5", "Independent_163_6": "Independent_163_6", "Independent_163_7": "Independent_163_7", "Independent_163_8": "Independent_163_8", "Independent_164_1": "Independent_164_1", "Independent_165_1": "Independent_165_1", "Independent_165_2": "Independent_165_2", "Independent_165_3": "Independent_165_3", "Independent_166_1": "Independent_166_1", "Independent_166_2": "Independent_166_2", "Independent_166_3": "Independent_166_3", "Independent_166_4": "Independent_166_4", "Independent_167_1": "Independent_167_1", "Independent_167_2": "Independent_167_2", "Independent_167_3": "Independent_167_3", "Independent_167_4": "Independent_167_4", "Independent_167_5": "Independent_167_5", "Independent_168_1": "Independent_168_1", "Independent_168_2": "Independent_168_2", "Independent_168_3": "Independent_168_3", "Independent_168_4": "Independent_168_4", "Independent_168_5": "Independent_168_5", "Independent_168_6": "Independent_168_6", "Independent_169_1": "Independent_169_1", "Independent_169_2": "Independent_169_2", "Independent_169_3": "Independent_169_3", "Independent_169_4": "Independent_169_4", "Independent_169_5": "Independent_169_5", "Independent_169_6": "Independent_169_6", "Independent_170_1": "Independent_170_1", "Independent_170_2": "Independent_170_2", "Independent_170_3": "Independent_170_3", "Independent_170_4": "Independent_170_4", "Independent_171_1": "Independent_171_1", "Independent_171_2": "Independent_171_2", "Independent_171_3": "Independent_171_3", "Independent_171_4": "Independent_171_4", "MSKK": "MSKK", "Independent_172_1": "Independent_172_1", "Independent_172_2": "Independent_172_2", "Independent_172_3": "Independent_172_3", "Independent_172_4": "Independent_172_4", "Independent_173_1": "Independent_173_1", "Independent_173_2": "Independent_173_2", "Independent_175_1": "Independent_175_1", "Independent_175_2": "Independent_175_2", "Independent_175_3": "Independent_175_3", "Independent_176_1": "Independent_176_1", "Independent_177_1": "Independent_177_1", "Independent_177_2": "Independent_177_2", "Independent_178_1": "Independent_178_1", "Independent_178_2": "Independent_178_2", "Independent_179_1": "Independent_179_1", "Independent_179_2": "Independent_179_2", "Independent_179_3": "Independent_179_3", "Independent_179_4": "Independent_179_4", "Independent_179_5": "Independent_179_5", "Independent_180_1": "Independent_180_1", "Independent_180_2": "Independent_180_2", "Independent_180_3": "Independent_180_3", "Independent_180_4": "Independent_180_4", "Independent_180_5": "Independent_180_5", "Independent_180_6": "Independent_180_6", "Independent_180_7": "Independent_180_7", "Independent_180_8": "Independent_180_8", "Independent_180_9": "Independent_180_9", "Independent_181_1": "Independent_181_1", "Independent_181_2": "Independent_181_2", "Independent_181_3": "Independent_181_3", "Independent_181_4": "Independent_181_4", "Independent_182_1": "Independent_182_1", "Independent_182_2": "Independent_182_2", "Independent_182_3": "Independent_182_3", "Independent_182_4": "Independent_182_4", "Independent_183_1": "Independent_183_1", "Independent_183_2": "Independent_183_2", "Independent_183_3": "Independent_183_3", "Independent_183_4": "Independent_183_4", "Independent_183_5": "Independent_183_5", "Independent_183_6": "Independent_183_6", "Independent_183_7": "Independent_183_7", "Independent_183_8": "Independent_183_8", "Independent_183_9": "Independent_183_9", "Independent_183_10": "Independent_183_10", "Independent_184_1": "Independent_184_1", "Independent_184_2": "Independent_184_2", "Independent_184_3": "Independent_184_3", "Independent_184_4": "Independent_184_4", "Independent_184_5": "Independent_184_5", "Independent_185_1": "Independent_185_1", "Independent_185_2": "Independent_185_2", "Independent_185_3": "Independent_185_3", "Independent_185_4": "Independent_185_4", "Independent_185_5": "Independent_185_5", "Independent_185_6": "Independent_185_6", "Independent_185_7": "Independent_185_7", "Independent_185_8": "Independent_185_8", "Independent_186_1": "Independent_186_1", "Independent_186_2": "Independent_186_2", "Independent_186_3": "Independent_186_3", "Independent_186_4": "Independent_186_4", "Independent_186_5": "Independent_186_5", "Independent_187_1": "Independent_187_1", "Independent_187_2": "Independent_187_2", "Independent_188_1": "Independent_188_1", "Independent_188_2": "Independent_188_2", "Independent_188_3": "Independent_188_3", "Independent_188_4": "Independent_188_4", "Independent_188_5": "Independent_188_5", "Independent_188_6": "Independent_188_6", "Independent_188_7": "Independent_188_7", "Independent_188_8": "Independent_188_8", "Independent_188_9": "Independent_188_9", "Independent_188_10": "Independent_188_10", "RJD": "RJD", "Independent_189_1": "Independent_189_1", "Independent_189_2": "Independent_189_2", "Independent_189_3": "Independent_189_3", "Independent_189_4": "Independent_189_4", "RTRJP": "RTRJP", "Independent_189_5": "Independent_189_5", "SASAP": "SASAP", "Independent_189_6": "Independent_189_6", "Independent_190_1": "Independent_190_1", "Independent_190_2": "Independent_190_2", "Independent_190_3": "Independent_190_3", "Independent_190_4": "Independent_190_4", "Independent_190_5": "Independent_190_5", "Independent_191_1": "Independent_191_1", "Independent_191_2": "Independent_191_2", "Independent_191_3": "Independent_191_3", "Independent_191_4": "Independent_191_4", "Independent_191_5": "Independent_191_5", "Independent_191_6": "Independent_191_6", "Independent_191_7": "Independent_191_7", "Independent_191_8": "Independent_191_8", "Independent_191_9": "Independent_191_9", "SDP": "SDP", "Independent_192_1": "Independent_192_1", "Independent_192_2": "Independent_192_2", "Independent_192_3": "Independent_192_3", "Independent_192_4": "Independent_192_4", "Independent_193_1": "Independent_193_1", "Independent_193_2": "Independent_193_2", "Independent_193_3": "Independent_193_3", "Independent_193_4": "Independent_193_4", "Independent_193_5": "Independent_193_5", "Independent_193_6": "Independent_193_6", "Independent_193_7": "Independent_193_7", "Independent_193_8": "Independent_193_8", "Independent_193_9": "Independent_193_9", "Independent_194_1": "Independent_194_1", "Independent_194_2": "Independent_194_2", "Independent_194_3": "Independent_194_3", "Independent_194_4": "Independent_194_4", "Independent_194_5": "Independent_194_5", "Independent_194_6": "Independent_194_6", "Independent_194_7": "Independent_194_7", "Independent_194_8": "Independent_194_8", "Independent_194_9": "Independent_194_9", "Independent_195_1": "Independent_195_1", "Independent_195_2": "Independent_195_2", "Independent_195_3": "Independent_195_3", "Independent_195_4": "Independent_195_4", "Independent_195_5": "Independent_195_5", "Independent_195_6": "Independent_195_6", "Independent_196_1": "Independent_196_1", "Independent_196_2": "Independent_196_2", "Independent_196_3": "Independent_196_3", "Independent_196_4": "Independent_196_4", "Independent_196_5": "Independent_196_5", "Independent_196_6": "Independent_196_6", "Independent_196_7": "Independent_196_7", "Independent_196_8": "Independent_196_8", "Independent_196_9": "Independent_196_9", "Independent_197_1": "Independent_197_1", "Independent_197_2": "Independent_197_2", "Independent_197_3": "Independent_197_3", "Independent_197_4": "Independent_197_4", "Independent_197_5": "Independent_197_5", "Independent_198_1": "Independent_198_1", "Independent_198_2": "Independent_198_2", "Independent_198_3": "Independent_198_3", "Independent_198_4": "Independent_198_4", "Independent_198_5": "Independent_198_5", "Independent_198_6": "Independent_198_6", "Independent_198_7": "Independent_198_7", "Independent_198_8": "Independent_198_8", "Independent_199_1": "Independent_199_1", "Independent_199_2": "Independent_199_2", "Independent_199_3": "Independent_199_3", "Independent_199_4": "Independent_199_4", "Independent_199_5": "Independent_199_5", "Independent_199_6": "Independent_199_6", "Independent_199_7": "Independent_199_7", "Independent_199_8": "Independent_199_8", "Independent_199_9": "Independent_199_9", "Independent_199_10": "Independent_199_10", "Independent_200_1": "Independent_200_1", "Independent_200_2": "Independent_200_2", "Independent_200_3": "Independent_200_3", "Independent_200_4": "Independent_200_4", "Independent_200_5": "Independent_200_5", "Independent_200_6": "Independent_200_6", "Independent_200_7": "Independent_200_7", "Independent_200_8": "Independent_200_8", "Independent_200_9": "Independent_200_9", "Independent_201_1": "Independent_201_1", "Independent_201_2": "Independent_201_2", "Independent_201_3": "Independent_201_3", "Independent_201_4": "Independent_201_4", "Independent_201_5": "Independent_201_5", "Independent_201_6": "Independent_201_6", "Independent_201_7": "Independent_201_7", "Independent_201_8": "Independent_201_8", "Independent_202_1": "Independent_202_1", "MAKKK": "MAKKK", "Independent_202_2": "Independent_202_2", "Independent_202_3": "Independent_202_3", "Independent_202_4": "Independent_202_4", "Independent_202_5": "Independent_202_5", "Independent_202_6": "Independent_202_6", "Independent_202_7": "Independent_202_7", "Independent_202_8": "Independent_202_8", "Independent_202_9": "Independent_202_9", "Independent_202_10": "Independent_202_10", "Independent_202_11": "Independent_202_11", "Independent_203_1": "Independent_203_1", "Independent_203_2": "Independent_203_2", "Independent_203_3": "Independent_203_3", "Independent_203_4": "Independent_203_4", "Independent_203_5": "Independent_203_5", "Independent_203_6": "Independent_203_6", "Independent_203_7": "Independent_203_7", "Independent_203_8": "Independent_203_8", "Independent_203_9": "Independent_203_9", "Independent_203_10": "Independent_203_10", "Independent_204_1": "Independent_204_1", "Independent_204_2": "Independent_204_2", "Independent_204_3": "Independent_204_3", "Independent_204_4": "Independent_204_4", "Independent_204_5": "Independent_204_5", "Independent_204_6": "Independent_204_6", "Independent_204_7": "Independent_204_7", "Independent_204_8": "Independent_204_8", "Independent_204_9": "Independent_204_9", "Independent_204_10": "Independent_204_10", "Independent_205_1": "Independent_205_1", "Independent_205_2": "Independent_205_2", "Independent_205_3": "Independent_205_3", "Independent_205_4": "Independent_205_4", "Independent_205_5": "Independent_205_5", "Independent_205_6": "Independent_205_6", "Independent_205_7": "Independent_205_7", "JKNPP": "JKNPP", "Independent_205_8": "Independent_205_8", "Independent_205_9": "Independent_205_9", "Independent_205_10": "Independent_205_10", "Independent_205_11": "Independent_205_11", "Independent_205_12": "Independent_205_12", "Independent_205_13": "Independent_205_13", "Independent_206_1": "Independent_206_1", "Independent_206_2": "Independent_206_2", "Independent_206_3": "Independent_206_3", "Independent_206_4": "Independent_206_4", "Independent_206_5": "Independent_206_5", "DMMK": "DMMK", "Independent_206_6": "Independent_206_6", "Independent_207_1": "Independent_207_1", "Independent_207_2": "Independent_207_2", "Independent_207_3": "Independent_207_3", "Independent_207_4": "Independent_207_4", "Independent_207_5": "Independent_207_5", "Independent_208_1": "Independent_208_1", "Independent_208_2": "Independent_208_2", "Independent_208_3": "Independent_208_3", "Independent_208_4": "Independent_208_4", "Independent_208_5": "Independent_208_5", "Independent_208_6": "Independent_208_6", "Independent_208_7": "Independent_208_7", "Independent_208_8": "Independent_208_8", "Independent_208_9": "Independent_208_9", "Independent_208_10": "Independent_208_10", "Independent_209_1": "Independent_209_1", "Independent_209_2": "Independent_209_2", "Independent_209_3": "Independent_209_3", "Independent_209_4": "Independent_209_4", "Independent_209_5": "Independent_209_5", "Independent_209_6": "Independent_209_6", "Independent_209_7": "Independent_209_7", "Independent_210_1": "Independent_210_1", "Independent_210_2": "Independent_210_2", "Independent_210_3": "Independent_210_3", "Independent_210_4": "Independent_210_4", "Independent_210_5": "Independent_210_5", "Independent_210_6": "Independent_210_6", "Independent_210_7": "Independent_210_7", "Independent_210_8": "Independent_210_8", "Independent_210_9": "Independent_210_9", "Independent_210_10": "Independent_210_10", "Independent_211_1": "Independent_211_1", "Independent_211_2": "Independent_211_2", "Independent_211_3": "Independent_211_3", "Independent_211_4": "Independent_211_4", "Independent_211_5": "Independent_211_5", "Independent_211_6": "Independent_211_6", "Independent_211_7": "Independent_211_7", "Independent_211_8": "Independent_211_8", "Independent_212_1": "Independent_212_1", "Independent_212_2": "Independent_212_2", "Independent_212_3": "Independent_212_3", "Independent_212_4": "Independent_212_4", "Independent_212_5": "Independent_212_5", "Independent_213_1": "Independent_213_1", "Independent_213_2": "Independent_213_2", "Independent_213_3": "Independent_213_3", "Independent_213_4": "Independent_213_4", "Independent_213_5": "Independent_213_5", "Independent_214_1": "Independent_214_1", "Independent_214_2": "Independent_214_2", "Independent_214_3": "Independent_214_3", "Independent_215_1": "Independent_215_1", "Independent_215_2": "Independent_215_2", "Independent_215_3": "Independent_215_3", "Independent_215_4": "Independent_215_4", "Independent_215_5": "Independent_215_5", "Independent_215_6": "Independent_215_6", "Independent_216_1": "Independent_216_1", "Independent_216_2": "Independent_216_2", "Independent_216_3": "Independent_216_3", "Independent_216_4": "Independent_216_4", "Independent_216_5": "Independent_216_5", "Independent_216_6": "Independent_216_6", "Independent_216_7": "Independent_216_7", "Independent_216_8": "Independent_216_8", "Independent_216_9": "Independent_216_9", "Independent_217_1": "Independent_217_1", "Independent_217_2": "Independent_217_2", "Independent_217_3": "Independent_217_3", "Independent_217_4": "Independent_217_4", "Independent_217_5": "Independent_217_5", "Independent_217_6": "Independent_217_6", "Independent_218_1": "Independent_218_1", "Independent_218_2": "Independent_218_2", "Independent_218_3": "Independent_218_3", "ABHM": "ABHM", "Independent_219_1": "Independent_219_1", "Independent_219_2": "Independent_219_2", "Independent_219_3": "Independent_219_3", "Independent_219_4": "Independent_219_4", "Independent_220_1": "Independent_220_1", "Independent_220_2": "Independent_220_2", "Independent_220_3": "Independent_220_3", "Independent_221_1": "Independent_221_1", "Independent_221_2": "Independent_221_2", "Independent_221_3": "Independent_221_3", "Independent_221_4": "Independent_221_4", "Independent_221_5": "Independent_221_5", "Independent_221_6": "Independent_221_6", "Independent_222_1": "Independent_222_1", "Independent_222_2": "Independent_222_2", "Independent_222_3": "Independent_222_3", "Independent_223_1": "Independent_223_1", "Independent_223_2": "Independent_223_2", "Independent_223_3": "Independent_223_3", "Independent_223_4": "Independent_223_4", "Independent_223_5": "Independent_223_5", "Independent_224_1": "Independent_224_1", "Independent_224_2": "Independent_224_2", "Independent_224_3": "Independent_224_3", "Independent_224_4": "Independent_224_4", "Independent_224_5": "Independent_224_5", "Independent_224_6": "Independent_224_6", "Independent_224_7": "Independent_224_7", "Independent_224_8": "Independent_224_8", "Independent_225_1": "Independent_225_1", "Independent_225_2": "Independent_225_2", "Independent_225_3": "Independent_225_3", "Independent_225_4": "Independent_225_4", "Independent_225_5": "Independent_225_5", "Independent_225_6": "Independent_225_6", "Independent_225_7": "Independent_225_7", "Independent_225_8": "Independent_225_8", "Independent_225_9": "Independent_225_9", "Independent_225_10": "Independent_225_10", "Independent_226_1": "Independent_226_1", "Independent_226_2": "Independent_226_2", "Independent_226_3": "Independent_226_3", "Independent_226_4": "Independent_226_4", "Independent_226_5": "Independent_226_5", "Independent_226_6": "Independent_226_6", "Independent_227_1": "Independent_227_1", "Independent_227_2": "Independent_227_2", "Independent_227_3": "Independent_227_3", "Independent_227_4": "Independent_227_4", "Independent_227_5": "Independent_227_5", "Independent_228_1": "Independent_228_1", "Independent_228_2": "Independent_228_2", "Independent_228_3": "Independent_228_3", "Independent_228_4": "Independent_228_4", "Independent_228_5": "Independent_228_5", "Independent_228_6": "Independent_228_6", "Independent_228_7": "Independent_228_7", "Independent_229_1": "Independent_229_1", "Independent_229_2": "Independent_229_2", "Independent_229_3": "Independent_229_3", "Independent_229_4": "Independent_229_4", "Independent_229_5": "Independent_229_5", "Independent_229_6": "Independent_229_6", "Independent_229_7": "Independent_229_7", "DCLF": "DCLF", "Independent_230_1": "Independent_230_1", "CPIM": "CPIM", "Independent_230_2": "Independent_230_2", "Independent_230_3": "Independent_230_3", "Independent_230_4": "Independent_230_4", "Independent_230_5": "Independent_230_5", "Independent_230_6": "Independent_230_6", "Independent_230_7": "Independent_230_7", "Independent_231_1": "Independent_231_1", "Independent_231_2": "Independent_231_2", "Independent_231_3": "Independent_231_3", "Independent_232_1": "Independent_232_1", "Independent_232_2": "Independent_232_2", "Independent_232_3": "Independent_232_3", "Independent_232_4": "Independent_232_4", "Independent_233_1": "Independent_233_1", "Independent_233_2": "Independent_233_2", "Independent_233_3": "Independent_233_3", "Independent_233_4": "Independent_233_4", "Independent_233_5": "Independent_233_5", "Independent_233_6": "Independent_233_6", "Independent_233_7": "Independent_233_7", "Independent_233_8": "Independent_233_8", "Independent_234_1": "Independent_234_1", "Independent_234_2": "Independent_234_2", "Independent_234_3": "Independent_234_3", "Independent_234_4": "Independent_234_4", "Independent_234_5": "Independent_234_5", "Independent_234_6": "Independent_234_6"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 232, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 232, "registered_not_positive": 232}, "n_stations_flagged": 232, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:40:10.936853", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.604, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.56, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.524, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.406, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.069, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.314, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.323, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.524, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.406, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.406, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.311, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.311, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.628, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.616, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 232}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f026793211f340d09e5981f1513eb7d9", "name": "India 2018 local (overnight india-madhya-pradesh-2018-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2018, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Madhya_Pradesh/Madhya_Pradesh_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"INC": "INC", "BJP": "BJP", "BSP": "BSP", "AAP": "AAP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "BMUP": "BMUP", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "JPJD": "JPJD", "RKSP": "RKSP", "IVD": "IVD", "JANADIP": "JANADIP", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "Independent_2_3": "Independent_2_3", "Independent_2_4": "Independent_2_4", "Independent_2_5": "Independent_2_5", "Independent_2_6": "Independent_2_6", "Independent_2_7": "Independent_2_7", "Independent_2_8": "Independent_2_8", "BHVD": "BHVD", "Independent_2_9": "Independent_2_9", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "SHS": "SHS", "SP": "SP", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "Independent_3_3": "Independent_3_3", "Independent_3_4": "Independent_3_4", "AIFB": "AIFB", "BGSP": "BGSP", "BPCP": "BPCP", "MD": "MD", "CPM": "CPM", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "SPKP": "SPKP", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "Independent_4_4": "Independent_4_4", "Independent_4_5": "Independent_4_5", "BASD": "BASD", "RSPS": "RSPS", "Independent_4_6": "Independent_4_6", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "Independent_5_2": "Independent_5_2", "Independent_5_3": "Independent_5_3", "Independent_5_4": "Independent_5_4", "Independent_5_5": "Independent_5_5", "RRM": "RRM", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "Independent_6_2": "Independent_6_2", "Independent_6_3": "Independent_6_3", "Independent_6_4": "Independent_6_4", "Independent_6_5": "Independent_6_5", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "Independent_7_2": "Independent_7_2", "Independent_7_3": "Independent_7_3", "SAMSAMPA": "SAMSAMPA", "Independent_7_4": "Independent_7_4", "RLSP": "RLSP", "BJYP": "BJYP", "Independent_7_5": "Independent_7_5", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "Independent_8_3": "Independent_8_3", "Independent_8_4": "Independent_8_4", "HCP": "HCP", "Independent_8_5": "Independent_8_5", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "LSWP": "LSWP", "Independent_9_2": "Independent_9_2", "Independent_9_3": "Independent_9_3", "Independent_9_4": "Independent_9_4", "Independent_9_5": "Independent_9_5", "Independent_9_6": "Independent_9_6", "Independent_9_7": "Independent_9_7", "Independent_9_8": "Independent_9_8", "SSKP": "SSKP", "Independent_9_9": "Independent_9_9", "RTKP": "RTKP", "Independent_9_10": "Independent_9_10", "Independent_9_11": "Independent_9_11", "Independent_9_12": "Independent_9_12", "Independent_9_13": "Independent_9_13", "Independent_9_14": "Independent_9_14", "Independent_9_15": "Independent_9_15", "Independent_9_16": "Independent_9_16", "Independent_9_17": "Independent_9_17", "Independent_9_18": "Independent_9_18", "Independent_9_19": "Independent_9_19", "Independent_9_20": "Independent_9_20", "Independent_9_21": "Independent_9_21", "Independent_9_22": "Independent_9_22", "Independent_9_23": "Independent_9_23", "Independent_9_24": "Independent_9_24", "Independent_9_25": "Independent_9_25", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "Independent_10_3": "Independent_10_3", "BSVSP": "BSVSP", "Independent_10_4": "Independent_10_4", "Independent_10_5": "Independent_10_5", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "Independent_11_3": "Independent_11_3", "Independent_11_4": "Independent_11_4", "Independent_11_5": "Independent_11_5", "Independent_11_6": "Independent_11_6", "Independent_11_7": "Independent_11_7", "Independent_11_8": "Independent_11_8", "Independent_11_9": "Independent_11_9", "Independent_11_10": "Independent_11_10", "Independent_11_11": "Independent_11_11", "Independent_11_12": "Independent_11_12", "Independent_11_13": "Independent_11_13", "Independent_11_14": "Independent_11_14", "Independent_11_15": "Independent_11_15", "Independent_11_16": "Independent_11_16", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "RSYSP": "RSYSP", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "Independent_12_3": "Independent_12_3", "Independent_12_4": "Independent_12_4", "Independent_12_5": "Independent_12_5", "Independent_12_6": "Independent_12_6", "Independent_12_7": "Independent_12_7", "Independent_12_8": "Independent_12_8", "Independent_12_9": "Independent_12_9", "Independent_12_10": "Independent_12_10", "Independent_12_11": "Independent_12_11", "Independent_12_12": "Independent_12_12", "Independent_12_13": "Independent_12_13", "Independent_12_14": "Independent_12_14", "Independent_12_15": "Independent_12_15", "Independent_12_16": "Independent_12_16", "Independent_12_17": "Independent_12_17", "Independent_12_18": "Independent_12_18", "Independent_12_19": "Independent_12_19", "Independent_12_20": "Independent_12_20", "Independent_12_21": "Independent_12_21", "Independent_12_22": "Independent_12_22", "Independent_12_23": "Independent_12_23", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "Independent_13_3": "Independent_13_3", "Independent_13_4": "Independent_13_4", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "AVIRP": "AVIRP", "Independent_14_3": "Independent_14_3", "Independent_14_4": "Independent_14_4", "Independent_14_5": "Independent_14_5", "Independent_14_6": "Independent_14_6", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_15_2": "Independent_15_2", "Independent_15_3": "Independent_15_3", "Independent_15_4": "Independent_15_4", "JLP": "JLP", "Independent_15_5": "Independent_15_5", "BAAP": "BAAP", "Independent_15_6": "Independent_15_6", "RP_B": "RP_B", "Independent_15_7": "Independent_15_7", "RSMD": "RSMD", "Independent_15_8": "Independent_15_8", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_16_2": "Independent_16_2", "Independent_16_3": "Independent_16_3", "Independent_16_4": "Independent_16_4", "BHAPP": "BHAPP", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "SUCI": "SUCI", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "ABHM": "ABHM", "Independent_17_3": "Independent_17_3", "Independent_17_4": "Independent_17_4", "Independent_17_5": "Independent_17_5", "Independent_17_6": "Independent_17_6", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_18_3": "Independent_18_3", "JSVP": "JSVP", "Independent_18_4": "Independent_18_4", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "Independent_19_3": "Independent_19_3", "Independent_19_4": "Independent_19_4", "Independent_19_5": "Independent_19_5", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_20_2": "Independent_20_2", "Independent_20_3": "Independent_20_3", "BSCP": "BSCP", "Independent_20_4": "Independent_20_4", "SNVRP": "SNVRP", "Independent_20_5": "Independent_20_5", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_21_2": "Independent_21_2", "Independent_21_3": "Independent_21_3", "Independent_21_4": "Independent_21_4", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "RSOSP": "RSOSP", "AABHP": "AABHP", "Independent_23_2": "Independent_23_2", "Independent_23_3": "Independent_23_3", "Independent_23_4": "Independent_23_4", "BRMD": "BRMD", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "Independent_24_2": "Independent_24_2", "Independent_24_3": "Independent_24_3", "Independent_24_4": "Independent_24_4", "SBIP": "SBIP", "Independent_24_5": "Independent_24_5", "Independent_24_6": "Independent_24_6", "Independent_24_7": "Independent_24_7", "Independent_24_8": "Independent_24_8", "Independent_24_9": "Independent_24_9", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "Independent_25_4": "Independent_25_4", "Independent_25_5": "Independent_25_5", "Independent_25_6": "Independent_25_6", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "PMSP": "PMSP", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "Independent_26_3": "Independent_26_3", "Independent_26_4": "Independent_26_4", "Independent_26_5": "Independent_26_5", "Independent_26_6": "Independent_26_6", "Independent_26_7": "Independent_26_7", "Independent_26_8": "Independent_26_8", "Independent_26_9": "Independent_26_9", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "Independent_27_3": "Independent_27_3", "Independent_27_4": "Independent_27_4", "Independent_27_5": "Independent_27_5", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "CPI": "CPI", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "Independent_28_4": "Independent_28_4", "PHSP_U": "PHSP_U", "RAJPA": "RAJPA", "ABGP": "ABGP", "Independent_28_5": "Independent_28_5", "KJSP": "KJSP", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "Independent_29_4": "Independent_29_4", "Independent_29_5": "Independent_29_5", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "Independent_30_3": "Independent_30_3", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_31_2": "Independent_31_2", "Independent_31_3": "Independent_31_3", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "MPTY": "MPTY", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "Independent_33_4": "Independent_33_4", "Independent_33_5": "Independent_33_5", "RAVNP": "RAVNP", "Independent_33_6": "Independent_33_6", "Independent_33_7": "Independent_33_7", "RmGP": "RmGP", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_34_3": "Independent_34_3", "Independent_34_4": "Independent_34_4", "Independent_34_5": "Independent_34_5", "Independent_34_6": "Independent_34_6", "Independent_34_7": "Independent_34_7", "Independent_34_8": "Independent_34_8", "Independent_34_9": "Independent_34_9", "RPI_A": "RPI_A", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_36_3": "Independent_36_3", "Independent_36_4": "Independent_36_4", "Independent_36_5": "Independent_36_5", "Independent_36_6": "Independent_36_6", "GGP": "GGP", "Independent_36_7": "Independent_36_7", "Independent_36_8": "Independent_36_8", "Independent_36_9": "Independent_36_9", "Independent_36_10": "Independent_36_10", "Independent_36_11": "Independent_36_11", "Independent_36_12": "Independent_36_12", "Independent_36_13": "Independent_36_13", "Independent_36_14": "Independent_36_14", "Independent_36_15": "Independent_36_15", "Independent_36_16": "Independent_36_16", "Independent_36_17": "Independent_36_17", "Independent_36_18": "Independent_36_18", "Independent_36_19": "Independent_36_19", "RJSMP": "RJSMP", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "Independent_37_3": "Independent_37_3", "Independent_37_4": "Independent_37_4", "Independent_37_5": "Independent_37_5", "Independent_37_6": "Independent_37_6", "Independent_37_7": "Independent_37_7", "Independent_37_8": "Independent_37_8", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_38_3": "Independent_38_3", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_39_2": "Independent_39_2", "Independent_39_3": "Independent_39_3", "Independent_39_4": "Independent_39_4", "Independent_39_5": "Independent_39_5", "Independent_39_6": "Independent_39_6", "Independent_39_7": "Independent_39_7", "Independent_39_8": "Independent_39_8", "Independent_39_9": "Independent_39_9", "Independent_39_10": "Independent_39_10", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "Independent_41_3": "Independent_41_3", "Independent_41_4": "Independent_41_4", "Independent_41_5": "Independent_41_5", "Independent_41_6": "Independent_41_6", "Independent_41_7": "Independent_41_7", "Independent_41_8": "Independent_41_8", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_42_2": "Independent_42_2", "Independent_42_3": "Independent_42_3", "Independent_42_4": "Independent_42_4", "Independent_42_5": "Independent_42_5", "Independent_42_6": "Independent_42_6", "Independent_42_7": "Independent_42_7", "Independent_42_8": "Independent_42_8", "Independent_42_9": "Independent_42_9", "Independent_42_10": "Independent_42_10", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_43_2": "Independent_43_2", "Independent_43_3": "Independent_43_3", "Independent_43_4": "Independent_43_4", "Independent_43_5": "Independent_43_5", "Independent_43_6": "Independent_43_6", "Independent_43_7": "Independent_43_7", "Independent_43_8": "Independent_43_8", "Independent_43_9": "Independent_43_9", "Independent_43_10": "Independent_43_10", "Independent_43_11": "Independent_43_11", "LJD": "LJD", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "Independent_44_3": "Independent_44_3", "Independent_44_4": "Independent_44_4", "Independent_44_5": "Independent_44_5", "Independent_44_6": "Independent_44_6", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_45_2": "Independent_45_2", "Independent_45_3": "Independent_45_3", "Independent_45_4": "Independent_45_4", "NINSHAD": "NINSHAD", "Independent_45_5": "Independent_45_5", "Independent_45_6": "Independent_45_6", "Independent_45_7": "Independent_45_7", "NYBP": "NYBP", "Independent_45_8": "Independent_45_8", "Independent_45_9": "Independent_45_9", "Independent_45_10": "Independent_45_10", "Independent_45_11": "Independent_45_11", "Independent_45_12": "Independent_45_12", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "Independent_46_3": "Independent_46_3", "Independent_46_4": "Independent_46_4", "Independent_46_5": "Independent_46_5", "Independent_46_6": "Independent_46_6", "Independent_46_7": "Independent_46_7", "Independent_46_8": "Independent_46_8", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "Independent_47_3": "Independent_47_3", "Independent_47_4": "Independent_47_4", "Independent_47_5": "Independent_47_5", "Independent_47_6": "Independent_47_6", "Independent_47_7": "Independent_47_7", "Independent_47_8": "Independent_47_8", "Independent_47_9": "Independent_47_9", "Independent_47_10": "Independent_47_10", "Independent_47_11": "Independent_47_11", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_48_2": "Independent_48_2", "Independent_48_3": "Independent_48_3", "Independent_48_4": "Independent_48_4", "Independent_48_5": "Independent_48_5", "Independent_48_6": "Independent_48_6", "BUNKD": "BUNKD", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "ADAL": "ADAL", "Independent_49_3": "Independent_49_3", "MPJVP": "MPJVP", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_50_3": "Independent_50_3", "Independent_50_4": "Independent_50_4", "Independent_50_5": "Independent_50_5", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_51_3": "Independent_51_3", "Independent_51_4": "Independent_51_4", "Independent_51_5": "Independent_51_5", "Independent_51_6": "Independent_51_6", "Independent_51_7": "Independent_51_7", "Independent_51_8": "Independent_51_8", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "ABASP": "ABASP", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "Independent_52_3": "Independent_52_3", "Independent_52_4": "Independent_52_4", "Independent_52_5": "Independent_52_5", "Independent_52_6": "Independent_52_6", "Independent_52_7": "Independent_52_7", "Independent_52_8": "Independent_52_8", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "Independent_53_2": "Independent_53_2", "Independent_53_3": "Independent_53_3", "Independent_53_4": "Independent_53_4", "Independent_53_5": "Independent_53_5", "Independent_53_6": "Independent_53_6", "Independent_53_7": "Independent_53_7", "BUMM": "BUMM", "Independent_53_8": "Independent_53_8", "Independent_53_9": "Independent_53_9", "Independent_53_10": "Independent_53_10", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_54_3": "Independent_54_3", "Independent_54_4": "Independent_54_4", "Independent_54_5": "Independent_54_5", "Independent_54_6": "Independent_54_6", "Independent_54_7": "Independent_54_7", "Independent_54_8": "Independent_54_8", "Independent_54_9": "Independent_54_9", "Independent_54_10": "Independent_54_10", "Independent_54_11": "Independent_54_11", "Independent_54_12": "Independent_54_12", "Independent_54_13": "Independent_54_13", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_55_2": "Independent_55_2", "Independent_55_3": "Independent_55_3", "Independent_55_4": "Independent_55_4", "Independent_55_5": "Independent_55_5", "Independent_55_6": "Independent_55_6", "Independent_55_7": "Independent_55_7", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_56_2": "Independent_56_2", "Independent_56_3": "Independent_56_3", "Independent_56_4": "Independent_56_4", "Independent_56_5": "Independent_56_5", "SP_MP": "SP_MP", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_58_1": "Independent_58_1", "Independent_58_2": "Independent_58_2", "Independent_58_3": "Independent_58_3", "Independent_58_4": "Independent_58_4", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "Independent_60_3": "Independent_60_3", "Independent_60_4": "Independent_60_4", "Independent_60_5": "Independent_60_5", "Independent_60_6": "Independent_60_6", "Independent_60_7": "Independent_60_7", "Independent_60_8": "Independent_60_8", "Independent_60_9": "Independent_60_9", "Independent_60_10": "Independent_60_10", "BBPSP": "BBPSP", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "Independent_61_3": "Independent_61_3", "Independent_61_4": "Independent_61_4", "Independent_61_5": "Independent_61_5", "Independent_61_6": "Independent_61_6", "Independent_61_7": "Independent_61_7", "Independent_61_8": "Independent_61_8", "BJMP": "BJMP", "PPID": "PPID", "JC": "JC", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_62_3": "Independent_62_3", "Independent_62_4": "Independent_62_4", "Independent_62_5": "Independent_62_5", "Independent_62_6": "Independent_62_6", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "ANASP": "ANASP", "ADVIP": "ADVIP", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "Independent_63_3": "Independent_63_3", "Independent_63_4": "Independent_63_4", "Independent_63_5": "Independent_63_5", "Independent_63_6": "Independent_63_6", "Independent_63_7": "Independent_63_7", "Independent_63_8": "Independent_63_8", "Independent_63_9": "Independent_63_9", "Independent_63_10": "Independent_63_10", "Independent_63_11": "Independent_63_11", "Independent_63_12": "Independent_63_12", "Independent_63_13": "Independent_63_13", "Independent_63_14": "Independent_63_14", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_64_2": "Independent_64_2", "Independent_64_3": "Independent_64_3", "Independent_64_4": "Independent_64_4", "ABAD": "ABAD", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_66_2": "Independent_66_2", "Independent_66_3": "Independent_66_3", "Independent_67_1": "Independent_67_1", "Independent_67_2": "Independent_67_2", "Independent_67_3": "Independent_67_3", "Independent_67_4": "Independent_67_4", "Independent_67_5": "Independent_67_5", "Independent_67_6": "Independent_67_6", "LPSP": "LPSP", "Independent_67_7": "Independent_67_7", "Independent_67_8": "Independent_67_8", "Independent_67_9": "Independent_67_9", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "JD_S": "JD_S", "PuPP": "PuPP", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "ABHKP": "ABHKP", "Independent_68_3": "Independent_68_3", "RsAD": "RsAD", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "ADSMP": "ADSMP", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_69_3": "Independent_69_3", "Independent_69_4": "Independent_69_4", "Independent_69_5": "Independent_69_5", "Independent_69_6": "Independent_69_6", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "Independent_70_2": "Independent_70_2", "Independent_70_3": "Independent_70_3", "Independent_70_4": "Independent_70_4", "Independent_70_5": "Independent_70_5", "Independent_70_6": "Independent_70_6", "Independent_70_7": "Independent_70_7", "Independent_70_8": "Independent_70_8", "Independent_70_9": "Independent_70_9", "Independent_70_10": "Independent_70_10", "Independent_71_1": "Independent_71_1", "Independent_71_2": "Independent_71_2", "Independent_71_3": "Independent_71_3", "Independent_71_4": "Independent_71_4", "Independent_71_5": "Independent_71_5", "Independent_71_6": "Independent_71_6", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_72_2": "Independent_72_2", "Independent_72_3": "Independent_72_3", "Independent_72_4": "Independent_72_4", "Independent_72_5": "Independent_72_5", "Independent_72_6": "Independent_72_6", "Independent_72_7": "Independent_72_7", "Independent_72_8": "Independent_72_8", "Independent_72_9": "Independent_72_9", "Independent_72_10": "Independent_72_10", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "JSMP": "JSMP", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "Independent_73_3": "Independent_73_3", "Independent_73_4": "Independent_73_4", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_74_2": "Independent_74_2", "Independent_74_3": "Independent_74_3", "SSAD": "SSAD", "Independent_74_4": "Independent_74_4", "RKIVP": "RKIVP", "Independent_74_5": "Independent_74_5", "Independent_74_6": "Independent_74_6", "Independent_74_7": "Independent_74_7", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_75_2": "Independent_75_2", "Independent_75_3": "Independent_75_3", "Independent_75_4": "Independent_75_4", "Independent_75_5": "Independent_75_5", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_76_3": "Independent_76_3", "Independent_76_4": "Independent_76_4", "SAMSP": "SAMSP", "Independent_76_5": "Independent_76_5", "Independent_76_6": "Independent_76_6", "Independent_76_7": "Independent_76_7", "Independent_76_8": "Independent_76_8", "VSP": "VSP", "Independent_76_9": "Independent_76_9", "Independent_76_10": "Independent_76_10", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_77_2": "Independent_77_2", "Independent_77_3": "Independent_77_3", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_78_2": "Independent_78_2", "Independent_78_3": "Independent_78_3", "Independent_78_4": "Independent_78_4", "Independent_78_5": "Independent_78_5", "Independent_79_1": "Independent_79_1", "JANKP": "JANKP", "SMASP": "SMASP", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_80_2": "Independent_80_2", "Independent_80_3": "Independent_80_3", "Independent_80_4": "Independent_80_4", "Independent_80_5": "Independent_80_5", "Independent_80_6": "Independent_80_6", "Independent_82_1": "Independent_82_1", "Independent_82_2": "Independent_82_2", "Independent_82_3": "Independent_82_3", "Independent_82_4": "Independent_82_4", "Independent_82_5": "Independent_82_5", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_83_2": "Independent_83_2", "Independent_83_3": "Independent_83_3", "Independent_84_1": "Independent_84_1", "Independent_84_2": "Independent_84_2", "Independent_85_1": "Independent_85_1", "Independent_85_2": "Independent_85_2", "Independent_85_3": "Independent_85_3", "Independent_85_4": "Independent_85_4", "Independent_85_5": "Independent_85_5", "Independent_85_6": "Independent_85_6", "Independent_86_1": "Independent_86_1", "Independent_86_2": "Independent_86_2", "Independent_86_3": "Independent_86_3", "Independent_86_4": "Independent_86_4", "Independent_86_5": "Independent_86_5", "Independent_86_6": "Independent_86_6", "Independent_86_7": "Independent_86_7", "Independent_87_1": "Independent_87_1", "Independent_87_2": "Independent_87_2", "Independent_87_3": "Independent_87_3", "Independent_87_4": "Independent_87_4", "Independent_88_1": "Independent_88_1", "Independent_88_2": "Independent_88_2", "Independent_88_3": "Independent_88_3", "RAMJP": "RAMJP", "RsJnP": "RsJnP", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_89_2": "Independent_89_2", "Independent_90_1": "Independent_90_1", "Independent_90_2": "Independent_90_2", "Independent_91_1": "Independent_91_1", "Independent_91_2": "Independent_91_2", "Independent_91_3": "Independent_91_3", "Independent_91_4": "Independent_91_4", "Independent_92_1": "Independent_92_1", "Independent_92_2": "Independent_92_2", "Independent_92_3": "Independent_92_3", "Independent_92_4": "Independent_92_4", "Independent_92_5": "Independent_92_5", "Independent_92_6": "Independent_92_6", "Independent_92_7": "Independent_92_7", "Independent_92_8": "Independent_92_8", "Independent_93_1": "Independent_93_1", "Independent_93_2": "Independent_93_2", "Independent_93_3": "Independent_93_3", "Independent_93_4": "Independent_93_4", "Independent_93_5": "Independent_93_5", "IPBP": "IPBP", "Independent_94_1": "Independent_94_1", "Independent_94_2": "Independent_94_2", "Independent_94_3": "Independent_94_3", "Independent_94_4": "Independent_94_4", "Independent_94_5": "Independent_94_5", "Independent_94_6": "Independent_94_6", "Independent_94_7": "Independent_94_7", "Independent_94_8": "Independent_94_8", "Independent_95_1": "Independent_95_1", "Independent_95_2": "Independent_95_2", "Independent_95_3": "Independent_95_3", "Independent_95_4": "Independent_95_4", "Independent_95_5": "Independent_95_5", "Independent_95_6": "Independent_95_6", "Independent_96_1": "Independent_96_1", "Independent_96_2": "Independent_96_2", "Independent_96_3": "Independent_96_3", "Independent_96_4": "Independent_96_4", "Independent_96_5": "Independent_96_5", "Independent_96_6": "Independent_96_6", "Independent_97_1": "Independent_97_1", "Independent_97_2": "Independent_97_2", "IUML": "IUML", "BSKRP": "BSKRP", "Independent_98_1": "Independent_98_1", "Independent_98_2": "Independent_98_2", "Independent_98_3": "Independent_98_3", "Independent_98_4": "Independent_98_4", "Independent_98_5": "Independent_98_5", "Independent_98_6": "Independent_98_6", "Independent_98_7": "Independent_98_7", "Independent_98_8": "Independent_98_8", "Independent_98_9": "Independent_98_9", "Independent_98_10": "Independent_98_10", "Independent_98_11": "Independent_98_11", "Independent_99_1": "Independent_99_1", "Independent_99_2": "Independent_99_2", "BJSMP": "BJSMP", "Independent_99_3": "Independent_99_3", "Independent_99_4": "Independent_99_4", "SBI": "SBI", "Independent_99_5": "Independent_99_5", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_100_2": "Independent_100_2", "Independent_100_3": "Independent_100_3", "Independent_100_4": "Independent_100_4", "Independent_101_1": "Independent_101_1", "Independent_101_2": "Independent_101_2", "Independent_101_3": "Independent_101_3", "Independent_101_4": "Independent_101_4", "Independent_101_5": "Independent_101_5", "PHSP": "PHSP", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_103_2": "Independent_103_2", "Independent_105_1": "Independent_105_1", "Independent_105_2": "Independent_105_2", "Independent_105_3": "Independent_105_3", "Independent_105_4": "Independent_105_4", "Independent_105_5": "Independent_105_5", "RGOP": "RGOP", "Independent_106_1": "Independent_106_1", "Independent_108_1": "Independent_108_1", "Independent_108_2": "Independent_108_2", "Independent_109_1": "Independent_109_1", "Independent_109_2": "Independent_109_2", "Independent_109_3": "Independent_109_3", "Independent_109_4": "Independent_109_4", "Independent_109_5": "Independent_109_5", "BRPP": "BRPP", "Independent_109_6": "Independent_109_6", "Independent_110_1": "Independent_110_1", "Independent_110_2": "Independent_110_2", "Independent_110_3": "Independent_110_3", "Independent_110_4": "Independent_110_4", "Independent_110_5": "Independent_110_5", "Independent_110_6": "Independent_110_6", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "Independent_111_2": "Independent_111_2", "Independent_111_3": "Independent_111_3", "Independent_111_4": "Independent_111_4", "Independent_111_5": "Independent_111_5", "Independent_111_6": "Independent_111_6", "Independent_111_7": "Independent_111_7", "Independent_111_8": "Independent_111_8", "Independent_112_1": "Independent_112_1", "Independent_112_2": "Independent_112_2", "Independent_112_3": "Independent_112_3", "Independent_112_4": "Independent_112_4", "Independent_112_5": "Independent_112_5", "API": "API", "Independent_113_1": "Independent_113_1", "Independent_113_2": "Independent_113_2", "Independent_113_3": "Independent_113_3", "Independent_113_4": "Independent_113_4", "Independent_113_5": "Independent_113_5", "Independent_113_6": "Independent_113_6", "Independent_113_7": "Independent_113_7", "Independent_113_8": "Independent_113_8", "Independent_113_9": "Independent_113_9", "Independent_113_10": "Independent_113_10", "PBI": "PBI", "Independent_114_1": "Independent_114_1", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_115_2": "Independent_115_2", "Independent_115_3": "Independent_115_3", "Independent_115_4": "Independent_115_4", "Independent_115_5": "Independent_115_5", "Independent_115_6": "Independent_115_6", "Independent_115_7": "Independent_115_7", "Independent_115_8": "Independent_115_8", "Independent_115_9": "Independent_115_9", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "Independent_116_2": "Independent_116_2", "Independent_116_3": "Independent_116_3", "Independent_116_4": "Independent_116_4", "Independent_116_5": "Independent_116_5", "Independent_118_1": "Independent_118_1", "Independent_118_2": "Independent_118_2", "Independent_119_1": "Independent_119_1", "Independent_119_2": "Independent_119_2", "Independent_120_1": "Independent_120_1", "Independent_120_2": "Independent_120_2", "Independent_121_1": "Independent_121_1", "Independent_121_2": "Independent_121_2", "Independent_122_1": "Independent_122_1", "Independent_122_2": "Independent_122_2", "Independent_122_3": "Independent_122_3", "Independent_122_4": "Independent_122_4", "Independent_123_1": "Independent_123_1", "Independent_123_2": "Independent_123_2", "Independent_123_3": "Independent_123_3", "Independent_124_1": "Independent_124_1", "Independent_124_2": "Independent_124_2", "Independent_124_3": "Independent_124_3", "Independent_124_4": "Independent_124_4", "Independent_124_5": "Independent_124_5", "Independent_124_6": "Independent_124_6", "Independent_124_7": "Independent_124_7", "Independent_125_1": "Independent_125_1", "Independent_125_2": "Independent_125_2", "Independent_125_3": "Independent_125_3", "Independent_125_4": "Independent_125_4", "Independent_125_5": "Independent_125_5", "Independent_125_6": "Independent_125_6", "Independent_125_7": "Independent_125_7", "Independent_125_8": "Independent_125_8", "Independent_125_9": "Independent_125_9", "Independent_125_10": "Independent_125_10", "Independent_126_1": "Independent_126_1", "Independent_126_2": "Independent_126_2", "Independent_126_3": "Independent_126_3", "Independent_126_4": "Independent_126_4", "Independent_126_5": "Independent_126_5", "AHSP": "AHSP", "Independent_127_1": "Independent_127_1", "Independent_127_2": "Independent_127_2", "Independent_127_3": "Independent_127_3", "Independent_128_1": "Independent_128_1", "Independent_128_2": "Independent_128_2", "Independent_128_3": "Independent_128_3", "Independent_128_4": "Independent_128_4", "Independent_128_5": "Independent_128_5", "Independent_129_1": "Independent_129_1", "Independent_129_2": "Independent_129_2", "Independent_129_3": "Independent_129_3", "Independent_129_4": "Independent_129_4", "Independent_129_5": "Independent_129_5", "Independent_129_6": "Independent_129_6", "Independent_130_1": "Independent_130_1", "Independent_130_2": "Independent_130_2", "Independent_130_3": "Independent_130_3", "Independent_130_4": "Independent_130_4", "Independent_130_5": "Independent_130_5", "Independent_130_6": "Independent_130_6", "Independent_130_7": "Independent_130_7", "Independent_131_1": "Independent_131_1", "Independent_131_2": "Independent_131_2", "Independent_131_3": "Independent_131_3", "Independent_131_4": "Independent_131_4", "Independent_131_5": "Independent_131_5", "Independent_131_6": "Independent_131_6", "Independent_131_7": "Independent_131_7", "Independent_132_1": "Independent_132_1", "Independent_132_2": "Independent_132_2", "Independent_132_3": "Independent_132_3", "Independent_132_4": "Independent_132_4", "Independent_132_5": "Independent_132_5", "Independent_132_6": "Independent_132_6", "Independent_133_1": "Independent_133_1", "Independent_134_1": "Independent_134_1", "Independent_134_2": "Independent_134_2", "Independent_135_1": "Independent_135_1", "Independent_135_2": "Independent_135_2", "Independent_135_3": "Independent_135_3", "Independent_135_4": "Independent_135_4", "Independent_135_5": "Independent_135_5", "Independent_136_1": "Independent_136_1", "SWJP": "SWJP", "Independent_136_2": "Independent_136_2", "Independent_136_3": "Independent_136_3", "Independent_136_4": "Independent_136_4", "Independent_137_1": "Independent_137_1", "Independent_137_2": "Independent_137_2", "PTSS": "PTSS", "Independent_137_3": "Independent_137_3", "Independent_137_4": "Independent_137_4", "Independent_138_1": "Independent_138_1", "Independent_138_2": "Independent_138_2", "Independent_138_3": "Independent_138_3", "Independent_138_4": "Independent_138_4", "Independent_138_5": "Independent_138_5", "Independent_138_6": "Independent_138_6", "Independent_138_7": "Independent_138_7", "Independent_138_8": "Independent_138_8", "Independent_139_1": "Independent_139_1", "Independent_140_1": "Independent_140_1", "Independent_140_2": "Independent_140_2", "Independent_140_3": "Independent_140_3", "AIDP": "AIDP", "Independent_141_1": "Independent_141_1", "Independent_141_2": "Independent_141_2", "Independent_141_3": "Independent_141_3", "Independent_142_1": "Independent_142_1", "Independent_142_2": "Independent_142_2", "Independent_142_3": "Independent_142_3", "Independent_142_4": "Independent_142_4", "Independent_142_5": "Independent_142_5", "Independent_143_1": "Independent_143_1", "Independent_143_2": "Independent_143_2", "Independent_143_3": "Independent_143_3", "Independent_143_4": "Independent_143_4", "Independent_143_5": "Independent_143_5", "Independent_143_6": "Independent_143_6", "Independent_143_7": "Independent_143_7", "Independent_143_8": "Independent_143_8", "Independent_143_9": "Independent_143_9", "Independent_143_10": "Independent_143_10", "Independent_143_11": "Independent_143_11", "Independent_144_1": "Independent_144_1", "Independent_144_2": "Independent_144_2", "Independent_144_3": "Independent_144_3", "Independent_144_4": "Independent_144_4", "Independent_144_5": "Independent_144_5", "PRBP": "PRBP", "Independent_145_1": "Independent_145_1", "Independent_145_2": "Independent_145_2", "Independent_145_3": "Independent_145_3", "Independent_146_1": "Independent_146_1", "Independent_147_1": "Independent_147_1", "Independent_147_2": "Independent_147_2", "Independent_147_3": "Independent_147_3", "Independent_147_4": "Independent_147_4", "Independent_147_5": "Independent_147_5", "Independent_147_6": "Independent_147_6", "Independent_148_1": "Independent_148_1", "Independent_148_2": "Independent_148_2", "Independent_148_3": "Independent_148_3", "Independent_149_1": "Independent_149_1", "Independent_149_2": "Independent_149_2", "Independent_150_1": "Independent_150_1", "Independent_150_2": "Independent_150_2", "Independent_150_3": "Independent_150_3", "Independent_150_4": "Independent_150_4", "Independent_151_1": "Independent_151_1", "Independent_151_2": "Independent_151_2", "Independent_151_3": "Independent_151_3", "Independent_151_4": "Independent_151_4", "Independent_151_5": "Independent_151_5", "Independent_151_6": "Independent_151_6", "Independent_151_7": "Independent_151_7", "Independent_151_8": "Independent_151_8", "Independent_151_9": "Independent_151_9", "Independent_151_10": "Independent_151_10", "SJP_C": "SJP_C", "Independent_151_11": "Independent_151_11", "Independent_151_12": "Independent_151_12", "Independent_151_13": "Independent_151_13", "Independent_151_14": "Independent_151_14", "Independent_151_15": "Independent_151_15", "Independent_151_16": "Independent_151_16", "Independent_151_17": "Independent_151_17", "Independent_151_18": "Independent_151_18", "Independent_151_19": "Independent_151_19", "Independent_151_20": "Independent_151_20", "Independent_152_1": "Independent_152_1", "Independent_152_2": "Independent_152_2", "Independent_152_3": "Independent_152_3", "Independent_152_4": "Independent_152_4", "RJAWP": "RJAWP", "Independent_152_5": "Independent_152_5", "DVP_B": "DVP_B", "RSGP": "RSGP", "Independent_153_1": "Independent_153_1", "Independent_153_2": "Independent_153_2", "Independent_153_3": "Independent_153_3", "Independent_153_4": "Independent_153_4", "Independent_154_1": "Independent_154_1", "Independent_154_2": "Independent_154_2", "Independent_154_3": "Independent_154_3", "Independent_154_4": "Independent_154_4", "Independent_154_5": "Independent_154_5", "Independent_154_6": "Independent_154_6", "Independent_154_7": "Independent_154_7", "INCP": "INCP", "Independent_154_8": "Independent_154_8", "Independent_155_1": "Independent_155_1", "Independent_155_2": "Independent_155_2", "SVSP": "SVSP", "Independent_155_3": "Independent_155_3", "Independent_155_4": "Independent_155_4", "Independent_156_1": "Independent_156_1", "Independent_156_2": "Independent_156_2", "Independent_156_3": "Independent_156_3", "Independent_156_4": "Independent_156_4", "Independent_156_5": "Independent_156_5", "BRSP": "BRSP", "Independent_156_6": "Independent_156_6", "Independent_156_7": "Independent_156_7", "PRSP": "PRSP", "Independent_157_1": "Independent_157_1", "Independent_157_2": "Independent_157_2", "Independent_157_3": "Independent_157_3", "Independent_158_1": "Independent_158_1", "Independent_158_2": "Independent_158_2", "Independent_158_3": "Independent_158_3", "Independent_158_4": "Independent_158_4", "Independent_158_5": "Independent_158_5", "Independent_158_6": "Independent_158_6", "Independent_158_7": "Independent_158_7", "Independent_158_8": "Independent_158_8", "Independent_158_9": "Independent_158_9", "Independent_159_1": "Independent_159_1", "Independent_159_2": "Independent_159_2", "Independent_159_3": "Independent_159_3", "Independent_159_4": "Independent_159_4", "Independent_160_1": "Independent_160_1", "Independent_160_2": "Independent_160_2", "Independent_160_3": "Independent_160_3", "Independent_160_4": "Independent_160_4", "Independent_160_5": "Independent_160_5", "Independent_161_1": "Independent_161_1", "Independent_161_2": "Independent_161_2", "Independent_161_3": "Independent_161_3", "Independent_161_4": "Independent_161_4", "Independent_161_5": "Independent_161_5", "Independent_161_6": "Independent_161_6", "Independent_162_1": "Independent_162_1", "Independent_162_2": "Independent_162_2", "Independent_162_3": "Independent_162_3", "Independent_162_4": "Independent_162_4", "Independent_162_5": "Independent_162_5", "Independent_162_6": "Independent_162_6", "Independent_163_1": "Independent_163_1", "Independent_163_2": "Independent_163_2", "Independent_164_1": "Independent_164_1", "Independent_164_2": "Independent_164_2", "Independent_165_1": "Independent_165_1", "Independent_165_2": "Independent_165_2", "Independent_165_3": "Independent_165_3", "Independent_166_1": "Independent_166_1", "Independent_166_2": "Independent_166_2", "Independent_167_1": "Independent_167_1", "Independent_167_2": "Independent_167_2", "Independent_167_3": "Independent_167_3", "Independent_167_4": "Independent_167_4", "Independent_167_5": "Independent_167_5", "Independent_167_6": "Independent_167_6", "Independent_168_1": "Independent_168_1", "Independent_168_2": "Independent_168_2", "Independent_170_1": "Independent_170_1", "Independent_170_2": "Independent_170_2", "Independent_170_3": "Independent_170_3", "Independent_170_4": "Independent_170_4", "Independent_170_5": "Independent_170_5", "Independent_170_6": "Independent_170_6", "Independent_171_1": "Independent_171_1", "Independent_171_2": "Independent_171_2", "Independent_171_3": "Independent_171_3", "Independent_171_4": "Independent_171_4", "Independent_172_1": "Independent_172_1", "Independent_172_2": "Independent_172_2", "Independent_172_3": "Independent_172_3", "Independent_173_1": "Independent_173_1", "Independent_173_2": "Independent_173_2", "Independent_174_1": "Independent_174_1", "Independent_174_2": "Independent_174_2", "Independent_174_3": "Independent_174_3", "Independent_174_4": "Independent_174_4", "Independent_175_1": "Independent_175_1", "Independent_176_1": "Independent_176_1", "Independent_176_2": "Independent_176_2", "Independent_177_1": "Independent_177_1", "Independent_177_2": "Independent_177_2", "Independent_177_3": "Independent_177_3", "Independent_178_1": "Independent_178_1", "Independent_178_2": "Independent_178_2", "Independent_178_3": "Independent_178_3", "Independent_179_1": "Independent_179_1", "Independent_179_2": "Independent_179_2", "Independent_180_1": "Independent_180_1", "Independent_180_2": "Independent_180_2", "Independent_180_3": "Independent_180_3", "Independent_180_4": "Independent_180_4", "Independent_180_5": "Independent_180_5", "Independent_180_6": "Independent_180_6", "Independent_181_1": "Independent_181_1", "Independent_181_2": "Independent_181_2", "Independent_181_3": "Independent_181_3", "Independent_181_4": "Independent_181_4", "Independent_182_1": "Independent_182_1", "Independent_182_2": "Independent_182_2", "Independent_182_3": "Independent_182_3", "Independent_182_4": "Independent_182_4", "Independent_182_5": "Independent_182_5", "Independent_183_1": "Independent_183_1", "Independent_183_2": "Independent_183_2", "Independent_183_3": "Independent_183_3", "Independent_184_1": "Independent_184_1", "Independent_184_2": "Independent_184_2", "Independent_185_1": "Independent_185_1", "Independent_185_2": "Independent_185_2", "Independent_185_3": "Independent_185_3", "Independent_185_4": "Independent_185_4", "Independent_185_5": "Independent_185_5", "Independent_186_1": "Independent_186_1", "Independent_186_2": "Independent_186_2", "Independent_187_1": "Independent_187_1", "Independent_189_1": "Independent_189_1", "Independent_190_1": "Independent_190_1", "Independent_190_2": "Independent_190_2", "Independent_190_3": "Independent_190_3", "Independent_191_1": "Independent_191_1", "Independent_191_2": "Independent_191_2", "Independent_192_1": "Independent_192_1", "Independent_192_2": "Independent_192_2", "Independent_192_3": "Independent_192_3", "Independent_192_4": "Independent_192_4", "Independent_192_5": "Independent_192_5", "Independent_193_1": "Independent_193_1", "Independent_193_2": "Independent_193_2", "Independent_193_3": "Independent_193_3", "AINHCP": "AINHCP", "Independent_194_1": "Independent_194_1", "Independent_194_2": "Independent_194_2", "Independent_194_3": "Independent_194_3", "Independent_195_1": "Independent_195_1", "Independent_195_2": "Independent_195_2", "BHBP": "BHBP", "Independent_197_1": "Independent_197_1", "Independent_200_1": "Independent_200_1", "Independent_200_2": "Independent_200_2", "BTP": "BTP", "Independent_200_3": "Independent_200_3", "Independent_201_1": "Independent_201_1", "Independent_201_2": "Independent_201_2", "Independent_201_3": "Independent_201_3", "Independent_202_1": "Independent_202_1", "Independent_202_2": "Independent_202_2", "Independent_203_1": "Independent_203_1", "Independent_203_2": "Independent_203_2", "Independent_203_3": "Independent_203_3", "Independent_203_4": "Independent_203_4", "Independent_203_5": "Independent_203_5", "Independent_203_6": "Independent_203_6", "Independent_204_1": "Independent_204_1", "Independent_204_2": "Independent_204_2", "Independent_204_3": "Independent_204_3", "Independent_205_1": "Independent_205_1", "Independent_205_2": "Independent_205_2", "Independent_205_3": "Independent_205_3", "Independent_206_1": "Independent_206_1", "SP_I": "SP_I", "Independent_207_1": "Independent_207_1", "Independent_207_2": "Independent_207_2", "Independent_207_3": "Independent_207_3", "MNDP": "MNDP", "TIPI": "TIPI", "Independent_208_1": "Independent_208_1", "Independent_208_2": "Independent_208_2", "Independent_209_1": "Independent_209_1", "Independent_209_2": "Independent_209_2", "Independent_209_3": "Independent_209_3", "Independent_210_1": "Independent_210_1", "Independent_210_2": "Independent_210_2", "Independent_210_3": "Independent_210_3", "Independent_210_4": "Independent_210_4", "Independent_211_1": "Independent_211_1", "Independent_211_2": "Independent_211_2", "Independent_212_1": "Independent_212_1", "Independent_212_2": "Independent_212_2", "Independent_212_3": "Independent_212_3", "Independent_212_4": "Independent_212_4", "Independent_212_5": "Independent_212_5", "Independent_213_1": "Independent_213_1", "Independent_213_2": "Independent_213_2", "Independent_214_1": "Independent_214_1", "Independent_214_2": "Independent_214_2", "Independent_214_3": "Independent_214_3", "Independent_214_4": "Independent_214_4", "Independent_215_1": "Independent_215_1", "Independent_215_2": "Independent_215_2", "Independent_215_3": "Independent_215_3", "Independent_215_4": "Independent_215_4", "Independent_215_5": "Independent_215_5", "Independent_216_1": "Independent_216_1", "Independent_216_2": "Independent_216_2", "Independent_216_3": "Independent_216_3", "Independent_217_1": "Independent_217_1", "Independent_217_2": "Independent_217_2", "Independent_217_3": "Independent_217_3", "Independent_217_4": "Independent_217_4", "Independent_218_1": "Independent_218_1", "Independent_218_2": "Independent_218_2", "BJJP": "BJJP", "Independent_221_1": "Independent_221_1", "Independent_221_2": "Independent_221_2", "Independent_221_3": "Independent_221_3", "Independent_222_1": "Independent_222_1", "Independent_222_2": "Independent_222_2", "Independent_224_1": "Independent_224_1", "Independent_224_2": "Independent_224_2", "Independent_224_3": "Independent_224_3", "Independent_225_1": "Independent_225_1", "Independent_225_2": "Independent_225_2", "Independent_225_3": "Independent_225_3", "Independent_226_1": "Independent_226_1", "Independent_226_2": "Independent_226_2", "RPI": "RPI", "Independent_227_1": "Independent_227_1", "Independent_227_2": "Independent_227_2", "Independent_227_3": "Independent_227_3", "Independent_227_4": "Independent_227_4", "Independent_227_5": "Independent_227_5", "Independent_227_6": "Independent_227_6", "Independent_227_7": "Independent_227_7", "Independent_229_1": "Independent_229_1", "Independent_229_2": "Independent_229_2", "Independent_229_3": "Independent_229_3", "Independent_230_1": "Independent_230_1", "Independent_230_2": "Independent_230_2", "Independent_230_3": "Independent_230_3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 230, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 230, "cast_gt_registered": 230}, "n_stations_flagged": 230, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:39:58.340194", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.604, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.56, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.482, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.363, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.069, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.482, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.482, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.363, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.277, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.277, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.623, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.546, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.546, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 230}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "28852bae91524c3881c1bed3995e3814", "name": "India 2018 local (overnight india-karnataka-2018-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2018, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Karnataka/Karnataka_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Independent_001_1": "Independent_001_1", "Independent_001_2": "Independent_001_2", "Independent_001_3": "Independent_001_3", "Independent_001_4": "Independent_001_4", "Independent_002_1": "Independent_002_1", "Independent_002_2": "Independent_002_2", "Independent_002_3": "Independent_002_3", "Independent_002_4": "Independent_002_4", "Independent_002_5": "Independent_002_5", "Independent_003_1": "Independent_003_1", "Independent_003_2": "Independent_003_2", "Independent_003_3": "Independent_003_3", "Independent_004_1": "Independent_004_1", "Independent_004_2": "Independent_004_2", "Independent_005_1": "Independent_005_1", "Independent_005_2": "Independent_005_2", "Independent_005_3": "Independent_005_3", "Independent_005_4": "Independent_005_4", "Independent_005_5": "Independent_005_5", "Independent_005_6": "Independent_005_6", "Independent_005_7": "Independent_005_7", "Independent_005_8": "Independent_005_8", "Independent_005_9": "Independent_005_9", "Independent_006_1": "Independent_006_1", "Independent_006_2": "Independent_006_2", "Independent_006_3": "Independent_006_3", "Independent_006_4": "Independent_006_4", "Independent_006_5": "Independent_006_5", "Independent_006_6": "Independent_006_6", "Independent_006_7": "Independent_006_7", "Independent_007_1": "Independent_007_1", "Independent_007_2": "Independent_007_2", "Independent_007_3": "Independent_007_3", "Independent_007_4": "Independent_007_4", "Independent_007_5": "Independent_007_5", "Independent_007_6": "Independent_007_6", "Independent_008_1": "Independent_008_1", "Independent_008_2": "Independent_008_2", "Independent_009_1": "Independent_009_1", "Independent_009_2": "Independent_009_2", "Independent_009_3": "Independent_009_3", "Independent_009_4": "Independent_009_4", "Independent_009_5": "Independent_009_5", "Independent_010_1": "Independent_010_1", "Independent_011_1": "Independent_011_1", "Independent_011_2": "Independent_011_2", "Independent_011_3": "Independent_011_3", "Independent_011_4": "Independent_011_4", "Independent_012_1": "Independent_012_1", "Independent_012_2": "Independent_012_2", "Independent_012_3": "Independent_012_3", "Independent_012_4": "Independent_012_4", "Independent_012_5": "Independent_012_5", "Independent_012_6": "Independent_012_6", "Independent_012_7": "Independent_012_7", "Independent_013_1": "Independent_013_1", "Independent_013_2": "Independent_013_2", "Independent_013_3": "Independent_013_3", "Independent_013_4": "Independent_013_4", "Independent_013_5": "Independent_013_5", "Independent_013_6": "Independent_013_6", "Independent_014_1": "Independent_014_1", "Independent_014_2": "Independent_014_2", "Independent_014_3": "Independent_014_3", "Independent_014_4": "Independent_014_4", "Independent_014_5": "Independent_014_5", "Independent_014_6": "Independent_014_6", "Independent_014_7": "Independent_014_7", "Independent_015_1": "Independent_015_1", "Independent_015_2": "Independent_015_2", "Independent_015_3": "Independent_015_3", "Independent_015_4": "Independent_015_4", "Independent_016_1": "Independent_016_1", "Independent_016_2": "Independent_016_2", "Independent_016_3": "Independent_016_3", "Independent_017_1": "Independent_017_1", "Independent_017_2": "Independent_017_2", "Independent_018_1": "Independent_018_1", "Independent_018_2": "Independent_018_2", "Independent_018_3": "Independent_018_3", "Independent_018_4": "Independent_018_4", "Independent_018_5": "Independent_018_5", "Independent_018_6": "Independent_018_6", "Independent_019_1": "Independent_019_1", "Independent_020_1": "Independent_020_1", "Independent_021_1": "Independent_021_1", "Independent_021_10": "Independent_021_10", "Independent_021_11": "Independent_021_11", "Independent_021_12": "Independent_021_12", "Independent_021_2": "Independent_021_2", "Independent_021_3": "Independent_021_3", "Independent_021_4": "Independent_021_4", "Independent_021_5": "Independent_021_5", "Independent_021_6": "Independent_021_6", "Independent_021_7": "Independent_021_7", "Independent_021_8": "Independent_021_8", "Independent_021_9": "Independent_021_9", "Independent_022_1": "Independent_022_1", "Independent_022_2": "Independent_022_2", "Independent_022_3": "Independent_022_3", "Independent_022_4": "Independent_022_4", "Independent_022_5": "Independent_022_5", "Independent_022_6": "Independent_022_6", "Independent_023_1": "Independent_023_1", "Independent_023_2": "Independent_023_2", "Independent_023_3": "Independent_023_3", "Independent_023_4": "Independent_023_4", "Independent_023_5": "Independent_023_5", "Independent_023_6": "Independent_023_6", "Independent_023_7": "Independent_023_7", "Independent_024_1": "Independent_024_1", "Independent_024_2": "Independent_024_2", "Independent_024_3": "Independent_024_3", "Independent_024_4": "Independent_024_4", "Independent_024_5": "Independent_024_5", "Independent_024_6": "Independent_024_6", "Independent_025_1": "Independent_025_1", "Independent_025_2": "Independent_025_2", "Independent_026_1": "Independent_026_1", "Independent_026_2": "Independent_026_2", "Independent_026_3": "Independent_026_3", "Independent_027_1": "Independent_027_1", "Independent_027_2": "Independent_027_2", "Independent_027_3": "Independent_027_3", "Independent_027_4": "Independent_027_4", "Independent_027_5": "Independent_027_5", "Independent_027_6": "Independent_027_6", "Independent_028_1": "Independent_028_1", "Independent_028_2": "Independent_028_2", "Independent_028_3": "Independent_028_3", "Independent_029_1": "Independent_029_1", "Independent_029_2": "Independent_029_2", "Independent_029_3": "Independent_029_3", "Independent_029_4": "Independent_029_4", "Independent_029_5": "Independent_029_5", "Independent_029_6": "Independent_029_6", "Independent_029_7": "Independent_029_7", "Independent_030_1": "Independent_030_1", "Independent_030_2": "Independent_030_2", "Independent_030_3": "Independent_030_3", "Independent_030_4": "Independent_030_4", "Independent_031_1": "Independent_031_1", "Independent_031_2": "Independent_031_2", "Independent_031_3": "Independent_031_3", "Independent_032_1": "Independent_032_1", "Independent_032_2": "Independent_032_2", "Independent_032_3": "Independent_032_3", "Independent_032_4": "Independent_032_4", "Independent_032_5": "Independent_032_5", "Independent_032_6": "Independent_032_6", "Independent_032_7": "Independent_032_7", "Independent_033_1": "Independent_033_1", "Independent_033_2": "Independent_033_2", "Independent_033_3": "Independent_033_3", "Independent_034_1": "Independent_034_1", "Independent_034_2": "Independent_034_2", "Independent_035_1": "Independent_035_1", "Independent_035_2": "Independent_035_2", "Independent_035_3": "Independent_035_3", "Independent_035_4": "Independent_035_4", "Independent_035_5": "Independent_035_5", "Independent_035_6": "Independent_035_6", "Independent_036_1": "Independent_036_1", "Independent_036_2": "Independent_036_2", "Independent_036_3": "Independent_036_3", "Independent_036_4": "Independent_036_4", "Independent_036_5": "Independent_036_5", "Independent_037_1": "Independent_037_1", "Independent_037_2": "Independent_037_2", "Independent_037_3": "Independent_037_3", "Independent_037_4": "Independent_037_4", "Independent_038_1": "Independent_038_1", "Independent_040_1": "Independent_040_1", "Independent_040_2": "Independent_040_2", "Independent_040_3": "Independent_040_3", "Independent_040_4": "Independent_040_4", "Independent_042_1": "Independent_042_1", "Independent_042_2": "Independent_042_2", "Independent_043_1": "Independent_043_1", "Independent_043_2": "Independent_043_2", "Independent_043_3": "Independent_043_3", "Independent_043_4": "Independent_043_4", "Independent_043_5": "Independent_043_5", "Independent_043_6": "Independent_043_6", "Independent_044_1": "Independent_044_1", "Independent_044_2": "Independent_044_2", "Independent_044_3": "Independent_044_3", "Independent_044_4": "Independent_044_4", "Independent_044_5": "Independent_044_5", "Independent_045_1": "Independent_045_1", "Independent_045_2": "Independent_045_2", "Independent_045_3": "Independent_045_3", "Independent_045_4": "Independent_045_4", "Independent_045_5": "Independent_045_5", "Independent_046_1": "Independent_046_1", "Independent_046_2": "Independent_046_2", "Independent_046_3": "Independent_046_3", "Independent_047_1": "Independent_047_1", "Independent_047_2": "Independent_047_2", "Independent_047_3": "Independent_047_3", "Independent_047_4": "Independent_047_4", "Independent_047_5": "Independent_047_5", "Independent_048_1": "Independent_048_1", "Independent_049_1": "Independent_049_1", "Independent_049_2": "Independent_049_2", "Independent_049_3": "Independent_049_3", "Independent_049_4": "Independent_049_4", "Independent_049_5": "Independent_049_5", "Independent_049_6": "Independent_049_6", "Independent_050_1": "Independent_050_1", "Independent_050_2": "Independent_050_2", "Independent_050_3": "Independent_050_3", "Independent_050_4": "Independent_050_4", "Independent_051_1": "Independent_051_1", "Independent_051_2": "Independent_051_2", "Independent_051_3": "Independent_051_3", "Independent_051_4": "Independent_051_4", "Independent_051_5": "Independent_051_5", "Independent_052_1": "Independent_052_1", "Independent_052_2": "Independent_052_2", "Independent_053_1": "Independent_053_1", "Independent_054_1": "Independent_054_1", "Independent_054_10": "Independent_054_10", "Independent_054_11": "Independent_054_11", "Independent_054_12": "Independent_054_12", "Independent_054_13": "Independent_054_13", "Independent_054_14": "Independent_054_14", "Independent_054_15": "Independent_054_15", "Independent_054_16": "Independent_054_16", "Independent_054_2": "Independent_054_2", "Independent_054_3": "Independent_054_3", "Independent_054_4": "Independent_054_4", "Independent_054_5": "Independent_054_5", "Independent_054_6": "Independent_054_6", "Independent_054_7": "Independent_054_7", "Independent_054_8": "Independent_054_8", "Independent_054_9": "Independent_054_9", "Independent_055_1": "Independent_055_1", "Independent_055_2": "Independent_055_2", "Independent_056_1": "Independent_056_1", "Independent_056_2": "Independent_056_2", "Independent_056_3": "Independent_056_3", "Independent_057_1": "Independent_057_1", "Independent_057_2": "Independent_057_2", "Independent_057_3": "Independent_057_3", "Independent_057_4": "Independent_057_4", "Independent_057_5": "Independent_057_5", "Independent_058_1": "Independent_058_1", "Independent_058_2": "Independent_058_2", "Independent_058_3": "Independent_058_3", "Independent_058_4": "Independent_058_4", "Independent_058_5": "Independent_058_5", "Independent_058_6": "Independent_058_6", "Independent_058_7": "Independent_058_7", "Independent_058_8": "Independent_058_8", "Independent_058_9": "Independent_058_9", "Independent_059_1": "Independent_059_1", "Independent_059_2": "Independent_059_2", "Independent_060_1": "Independent_060_1", "Independent_060_2": "Independent_060_2", "Independent_060_3": "Independent_060_3", "Independent_061_1": "Independent_061_1", "Independent_061_2": "Independent_061_2", "Independent_061_3": "Independent_061_3", "Independent_062_1": "Independent_062_1", "Independent_062_2": "Independent_062_2", "Independent_062_3": "Independent_062_3", "Independent_062_4": "Independent_062_4", "Independent_062_5": "Independent_062_5", "Independent_062_6": "Independent_062_6", "Independent_063_1": "Independent_063_1", "Independent_063_2": "Independent_063_2", "Independent_063_3": "Independent_063_3", "Independent_063_4": "Independent_063_4", "Independent_063_5": "Independent_063_5", "Independent_064_1": "Independent_064_1", "Independent_064_2": "Independent_064_2", "Independent_064_3": "Independent_064_3", "Independent_064_4": "Independent_064_4", "Independent_064_5": "Independent_064_5", "Independent_065_1": "Independent_065_1", "Independent_065_2": "Independent_065_2", "Independent_066_1": "Independent_066_1", "Independent_066_2": "Independent_066_2", "Independent_066_3": "Independent_066_3", "Independent_067_1": "Independent_067_1", "Independent_067_2": "Independent_067_2", "Independent_067_3": "Independent_067_3", "Independent_067_4": "Independent_067_4", "Independent_067_5": "Independent_067_5", "Independent_068_1": "Independent_068_1", "Independent_069_1": "Independent_069_1", "Independent_069_2": "Independent_069_2", "Independent_069_3": "Independent_069_3", "Independent_069_4": "Independent_069_4", "Independent_069_5": "Independent_069_5", "Independent_069_6": "Independent_069_6", "Independent_070_1": "Independent_070_1", "Independent_070_2": "Independent_070_2", "Independent_070_3": "Independent_070_3", "Independent_070_4": "Independent_070_4", "Independent_070_5": "Independent_070_5", "Independent_070_6": "Independent_070_6", "Independent_071_1": "Independent_071_1", "Independent_071_2": "Independent_071_2", "Independent_071_3": "Independent_071_3", "Independent_072_1": "Independent_072_1", "Independent_072_2": "Independent_072_2", "Independent_072_3": "Independent_072_3", "Independent_073_1": "Independent_073_1", "Independent_073_10": "Independent_073_10", "Independent_073_11": "Independent_073_11", "Independent_073_12": "Independent_073_12", "Independent_073_13": "Independent_073_13", "Independent_073_14": "Independent_073_14", "Independent_073_15": "Independent_073_15", "Independent_073_16": "Independent_073_16", "Independent_073_17": "Independent_073_17", "Independent_073_18": "Independent_073_18", "Independent_073_2": "Independent_073_2", "Independent_073_3": "Independent_073_3", "Independent_073_4": "Independent_073_4", "Independent_073_5": "Independent_073_5", "Independent_073_6": "Independent_073_6", "Independent_073_7": "Independent_073_7", "Independent_073_8": "Independent_073_8", "Independent_073_9": "Independent_073_9", "Independent_074_1": "Independent_074_1", "Independent_074_2": "Independent_074_2", "Independent_074_3": "Independent_074_3", "Independent_074_4": "Independent_074_4", "Independent_075_1": "Independent_075_1", "Independent_075_2": "Independent_075_2", "Independent_075_3": "Independent_075_3", "Independent_075_4": "Independent_075_4", "Independent_075_5": "Independent_075_5", "Independent_075_6": "Independent_075_6", "Independent_076_1": "Independent_076_1", "Independent_076_2": "Independent_076_2", "Independent_077_1": "Independent_077_1", "Independent_078_1": "Independent_078_1", "Independent_078_2": "Independent_078_2", "Independent_078_3": "Independent_078_3", "Independent_078_4": "Independent_078_4", "Independent_078_5": "Independent_078_5", "Independent_078_6": "Independent_078_6", "Independent_079_1": "Independent_079_1", "Independent_079_2": "Independent_079_2", "Independent_079_3": "Independent_079_3", "Independent_080_1": "Independent_080_1", "Independent_081_1": "Independent_081_1", "Independent_081_2": "Independent_081_2", "Independent_082_1": "Independent_082_1", "Independent_082_2": "Independent_082_2", "Independent_082_3": "Independent_082_3", "Independent_082_4": "Independent_082_4", "Independent_082_5": "Independent_082_5", "Independent_082_6": "Independent_082_6", "Independent_082_7": "Independent_082_7", "Independent_082_8": "Independent_082_8", "Independent_083_1": "Independent_083_1", "Independent_083_2": "Independent_083_2", "Independent_083_3": "Independent_083_3", "Independent_083_4": "Independent_083_4", "Independent_083_5": "Independent_083_5", "Independent_083_6": "Independent_083_6", "Independent_083_7": "Independent_083_7", "Independent_084_1": "Independent_084_1", "Independent_084_2": "Independent_084_2", "Independent_084_3": "Independent_084_3", "Independent_084_4": "Independent_084_4", "Independent_085_1": "Independent_085_1", "Independent_085_2": "Independent_085_2", "Independent_085_3": "Independent_085_3", "Independent_086_1": "Independent_086_1", "Independent_086_2": "Independent_086_2", "Independent_086_3": "Independent_086_3", "Independent_087_1": "Independent_087_1", "Independent_087_2": "Independent_087_2", "Independent_087_3": "Independent_087_3", "Independent_087_4": "Independent_087_4", "Independent_087_5": "Independent_087_5", "Independent_088_1": "Independent_088_1", "Independent_089_1": "Independent_089_1", "Independent_090_1": "Independent_090_1", "Independent_090_2": "Independent_090_2", "Independent_090_3": "Independent_090_3", "Independent_090_4": "Independent_090_4", "Independent_090_5": "Independent_090_5", "Independent_090_6": "Independent_090_6", "Independent_090_7": "Independent_090_7", "Independent_090_8": "Independent_090_8", "Independent_091_1": "Independent_091_1", "Independent_092_1": "Independent_092_1", "Independent_092_2": "Independent_092_2", "Independent_092_3": "Independent_092_3", "Independent_093_1": "Independent_093_1", "Independent_093_2": "Independent_093_2", "Independent_093_3": "Independent_093_3", "Independent_094_1": "Independent_094_1", "Independent_094_10": "Independent_094_10", "Independent_094_11": "Independent_094_11", "Independent_094_12": "Independent_094_12", "Independent_094_13": "Independent_094_13", "Independent_094_2": "Independent_094_2", "Independent_094_3": "Independent_094_3", "Independent_094_4": "Independent_094_4", "Independent_094_5": "Independent_094_5", "Independent_094_6": "Independent_094_6", "Independent_094_7": "Independent_094_7", "Independent_094_8": "Independent_094_8", "Independent_094_9": "Independent_094_9", "Independent_095_1": "Independent_095_1", "Independent_096_1": "Independent_096_1", "Independent_096_2": "Independent_096_2", "Independent_097_1": "Independent_097_1", "Independent_097_2": "Independent_097_2", "Independent_097_3": "Independent_097_3", "Independent_097_4": "Independent_097_4", "Independent_097_5": "Independent_097_5", "Independent_097_6": "Independent_097_6", "Independent_099_1": "Independent_099_1", "Independent_099_2": "Independent_099_2", "Independent_099_3": "Independent_099_3", "Independent_099_4": "Independent_099_4", "Independent_099_5": "Independent_099_5", "Independent_099_6": "Independent_099_6", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_100_2": "Independent_100_2", "Independent_100_3": "Independent_100_3", "Independent_101_1": "Independent_101_1", "Independent_101_2": "Independent_101_2", "Independent_101_3": "Independent_101_3", "Independent_101_4": "Independent_101_4", "Independent_101_5": "Independent_101_5", "Independent_101_6": "Independent_101_6", "Independent_102_1": "Independent_102_1", "Independent_102_10": "Independent_102_10", "Independent_102_2": "Independent_102_2", "Independent_102_3": "Independent_102_3", "Independent_102_4": "Independent_102_4", "Independent_102_5": "Independent_102_5", "Independent_102_6": "Independent_102_6", "Independent_102_7": "Independent_102_7", "Independent_102_8": "Independent_102_8", "Independent_102_9": "Independent_102_9", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_103_2": "Independent_103_2", "Independent_103_3": "Independent_103_3", "Independent_103_4": "Independent_103_4", "Independent_103_5": "Independent_103_5", "Independent_103_6": "Independent_103_6", "Independent_104_1": "Independent_104_1", "Independent_104_2": "Independent_104_2", "Independent_104_3": "Independent_104_3", "Independent_104_4": "Independent_104_4", "Independent_104_5": "Independent_104_5", "Independent_105_1": "Independent_105_1", "Independent_105_2": "Independent_105_2", "Independent_105_3": "Independent_105_3", "Independent_105_4": "Independent_105_4", "Independent_105_5": "Independent_105_5", "Independent_106_1": "Independent_106_1", "Independent_106_2": "Independent_106_2", "Independent_106_3": "Independent_106_3", "Independent_106_4": "Independent_106_4", "Independent_106_5": "Independent_106_5", "Independent_107_1": "Independent_107_1", "Independent_107_2": "Independent_107_2", "Independent_108_1": "Independent_108_1", "Independent_108_2": "Independent_108_2", "Independent_108_3": "Independent_108_3", "Independent_109_1": "Independent_109_1", "Independent_109_2": "Independent_109_2", "Independent_109_3": "Independent_109_3", "Independent_110_1": "Independent_110_1", "Independent_110_2": "Independent_110_2", "Independent_110_3": "Independent_110_3", "Independent_110_4": "Independent_110_4", "Independent_110_5": "Independent_110_5", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "Independent_111_2": "Independent_111_2", "Independent_112_1": "Independent_112_1", "Independent_112_2": "Independent_112_2", "Independent_112_3": "Independent_112_3", "Independent_112_4": "Independent_112_4", "Independent_112_5": "Independent_112_5", "Independent_112_6": "Independent_112_6", "Independent_112_7": "Independent_112_7", "Independent_112_8": "Independent_112_8", "Independent_112_9": "Independent_112_9", "Independent_113_1": "Independent_113_1", "Independent_113_10": "Independent_113_10", "Independent_113_11": "Independent_113_11", "Independent_113_12": "Independent_113_12", "Independent_113_2": "Independent_113_2", "Independent_113_3": "Independent_113_3", "Independent_113_4": "Independent_113_4", "Independent_113_5": "Independent_113_5", "Independent_113_6": "Independent_113_6", "Independent_113_7": "Independent_113_7", "Independent_113_8": "Independent_113_8", "Independent_113_9": "Independent_113_9", "Independent_114_1": "Independent_114_1", "Independent_114_2": "Independent_114_2", "Independent_114_3": "Independent_114_3", "Independent_114_4": "Independent_114_4", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_115_2": "Independent_115_2", "Independent_115_3": "Independent_115_3", "Independent_115_4": "Independent_115_4", "Independent_115_5": "Independent_115_5", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "Independent_116_2": "Independent_116_2", "Independent_116_3": "Independent_116_3", "Independent_117_1": "Independent_117_1", "Independent_117_2": "Independent_117_2", "Independent_117_3": "Independent_117_3", "Independent_118_1": "Independent_118_1", "Independent_118_2": "Independent_118_2", "Independent_118_3": "Independent_118_3", "Independent_118_4": "Independent_118_4", "Independent_120_1": "Independent_120_1", "Independent_120_2": "Independent_120_2", "Independent_122_1": "Independent_122_1", "Independent_122_2": "Independent_122_2", "Independent_122_3": "Independent_122_3", "Independent_123_1": "Independent_123_1", "Independent_123_2": "Independent_123_2", "Independent_123_3": "Independent_123_3", "Independent_124_1": "Independent_124_1", "Independent_124_2": "Independent_124_2", "Independent_124_3": "Independent_124_3", "Independent_124_4": "Independent_124_4", "Independent_125_1": "Independent_125_1", "Independent_125_10": "Independent_125_10", "Independent_125_11": "Independent_125_11", "Independent_125_12": "Independent_125_12", "Independent_125_13": "Independent_125_13", "Independent_125_2": "Independent_125_2", "Independent_125_3": "Independent_125_3", "Independent_125_4": "Independent_125_4", "Independent_125_5": "Independent_125_5", "Independent_125_6": "Independent_125_6", "Independent_125_7": "Independent_125_7", "Independent_125_8": "Independent_125_8", "Independent_125_9": "Independent_125_9", "Independent_126_1": "Independent_126_1", "Independent_126_2": "Independent_126_2", "Independent_126_3": "Independent_126_3", "Independent_126_4": "Independent_126_4", "Independent_126_5": "Independent_126_5", "Independent_126_6": "Independent_126_6", "Independent_127_1": "Independent_127_1", "Independent_127_2": "Independent_127_2", "Independent_127_3": "Independent_127_3", "Independent_127_4": "Independent_127_4", "Independent_127_5": "Independent_127_5", "Independent_127_6": "Independent_127_6", "Independent_128_1": "Independent_128_1", "Independent_128_2": "Independent_128_2", "Independent_128_3": "Independent_128_3", "Independent_128_4": "Independent_128_4", "Independent_129_1": "Independent_129_1", "Independent_129_10": "Independent_129_10", "Independent_129_2": "Independent_129_2", "Independent_129_3": "Independent_129_3", "Independent_129_4": "Independent_129_4", "Independent_129_5": "Independent_129_5", "Independent_129_6": "Independent_129_6", "Independent_129_7": "Independent_129_7", "Independent_129_8": "Independent_129_8", "Independent_129_9": "Independent_129_9", "Independent_130_1": "Independent_130_1", "Independent_130_2": "Independent_130_2", "Independent_130_3": "Independent_130_3", "Independent_130_4": "Independent_130_4", "Independent_130_5": "Independent_130_5", "Independent_130_6": "Independent_130_6", "Independent_130_7": "Independent_130_7", "Independent_130_8": "Independent_130_8", "Independent_131_1": "Independent_131_1", "Independent_131_2": "Independent_131_2", "Independent_131_3": "Independent_131_3", "Independent_131_4": "Independent_131_4", "Independent_132_1": "Independent_132_1", "Independent_132_2": "Independent_132_2", "Independent_132_3": "Independent_132_3", "Independent_133_1": "Independent_133_1", "Independent_133_2": "Independent_133_2", "Independent_133_3": "Independent_133_3", "Independent_133_4": "Independent_133_4", "Independent_133_5": "Independent_133_5", "Independent_133_6": "Independent_133_6", "Independent_133_7": "Independent_133_7", "Independent_134_1": "Independent_134_1", "Independent_134_2": "Independent_134_2", "Independent_134_3": "Independent_134_3", "Independent_134_4": "Independent_134_4", "Independent_134_5": "Independent_134_5", "Independent_134_6": "Independent_134_6", "Independent_134_7": "Independent_134_7", "Independent_135_1": "Independent_135_1", "Independent_135_2": "Independent_135_2", "Independent_135_3": "Independent_135_3", "Independent_135_4": "Independent_135_4", "Independent_135_5": "Independent_135_5", "Independent_135_6": "Independent_135_6", "Independent_135_7": "Independent_135_7", "Independent_136_1": "Independent_136_1", "Independent_136_10": "Independent_136_10", "Independent_136_2": "Independent_136_2", "Independent_136_3": "Independent_136_3", "Independent_136_4": "Independent_136_4", "Independent_136_5": "Independent_136_5", "Independent_136_6": "Independent_136_6", "Independent_136_7": "Independent_136_7", "Independent_136_8": "Independent_136_8", "Independent_136_9": "Independent_136_9", "Independent_137_1": "Independent_137_1", "Independent_137_2": "Independent_137_2", "Independent_137_3": "Independent_137_3", "Independent_137_4": "Independent_137_4", "Independent_137_5": "Independent_137_5", "Independent_138_1": "Independent_138_1", "Independent_138_2": "Independent_138_2", "Independent_138_3": "Independent_138_3", "Independent_138_4": "Independent_138_4", "Independent_138_5": "Independent_138_5", "Independent_138_6": "Independent_138_6", "Independent_138_7": "Independent_138_7", "Independent_138_8": "Independent_138_8", "Independent_138_9": "Independent_138_9", "Independent_139_1": "Independent_139_1", "Independent_139_2": "Independent_139_2", "Independent_139_3": "Independent_139_3", "Independent_139_4": "Independent_139_4", "Independent_140_1": "Independent_140_1", "Independent_140_2": "Independent_140_2", "Independent_140_3": "Independent_140_3", "Independent_140_4": "Independent_140_4", "Independent_140_5": "Independent_140_5", "Independent_140_6": "Independent_140_6", "Independent_141_1": "Independent_141_1", "Independent_141_2": "Independent_141_2", "Independent_141_3": "Independent_141_3", "Independent_141_4": "Independent_141_4", "Independent_141_5": "Independent_141_5", "Independent_141_6": "Independent_141_6", "Independent_142_1": "Independent_142_1", "Independent_142_2": "Independent_142_2", "Independent_142_3": "Independent_142_3", "Independent_142_4": "Independent_142_4", "Independent_142_5": "Independent_142_5", "Independent_142_6": "Independent_142_6", "Independent_142_7": "Independent_142_7", "Independent_143_1": "Independent_143_1", "Independent_143_10": "Independent_143_10", "Independent_143_11": "Independent_143_11", "Independent_143_12": "Independent_143_12", "Independent_143_2": "Independent_143_2", "Independent_143_3": "Independent_143_3", "Independent_143_4": "Independent_143_4", "Independent_143_5": "Independent_143_5", "Independent_143_6": "Independent_143_6", "Independent_143_7": "Independent_143_7", "Independent_143_8": "Independent_143_8", "Independent_143_9": "Independent_143_9", "Independent_144_1": "Independent_144_1", "Independent_144_2": "Independent_144_2", "Independent_144_3": "Independent_144_3", "Independent_144_4": "Independent_144_4", "Independent_144_5": "Independent_144_5", "Independent_144_6": "Independent_144_6", "Independent_145_1": "Independent_145_1", "Independent_145_10": "Independent_145_10", "Independent_145_11": "Independent_145_11", "Independent_145_12": "Independent_145_12", "Independent_145_13": "Independent_145_13", "Independent_145_14": "Independent_145_14", "Independent_145_15": "Independent_145_15", "Independent_145_16": "Independent_145_16", "Independent_145_17": "Independent_145_17", "Independent_145_18": "Independent_145_18", "Independent_145_19": "Independent_145_19", "Independent_145_2": "Independent_145_2", "Independent_145_20": "Independent_145_20", "Independent_145_21": "Independent_145_21", "Independent_145_22": "Independent_145_22", "Independent_145_23": "Independent_145_23", "Independent_145_24": "Independent_145_24", "Independent_145_25": "Independent_145_25", "Independent_145_26": "Independent_145_26", "Independent_145_27": "Independent_145_27", "Independent_145_28": "Independent_145_28", "Independent_145_29": "Independent_145_29", "Independent_145_3": "Independent_145_3", "Independent_145_30": "Independent_145_30", "Independent_145_31": "Independent_145_31", "Independent_145_32": "Independent_145_32", "Independent_145_33": "Independent_145_33", "Independent_145_34": "Independent_145_34", "Independent_145_35": "Independent_145_35", "Independent_145_4": "Independent_145_4", "Independent_145_5": "Independent_145_5", "Independent_145_6": "Independent_145_6", "Independent_145_7": "Independent_145_7", "Independent_145_8": "Independent_145_8", "Independent_145_9": "Independent_145_9", "Independent_146_1": "Independent_146_1", "Independent_146_2": "Independent_146_2", "Independent_146_3": "Independent_146_3", "Independent_146_4": "Independent_146_4", "Independent_146_5": "Independent_146_5", "Independent_147_1": "Independent_147_1", "Independent_147_2": "Independent_147_2", "Independent_147_3": "Independent_147_3", "Independent_147_4": "Independent_147_4", "Independent_147_5": "Independent_147_5", "Independent_148_1": "Independent_148_1", "Independent_148_10": "Independent_148_10", "Independent_148_11": "Independent_148_11", "Independent_148_12": "Independent_148_12", "Independent_148_13": "Independent_148_13", "Independent_148_2": "Independent_148_2", "Independent_148_3": "Independent_148_3", "Independent_148_4": "Independent_148_4", "Independent_148_5": "Independent_148_5", "Independent_148_6": "Independent_148_6", "Independent_148_7": "Independent_148_7", "Independent_148_8": "Independent_148_8", "Independent_148_9": "Independent_148_9", "Independent_149_1": "Independent_149_1", "Independent_149_2": "Independent_149_2", "Independent_149_3": "Independent_149_3", "Independent_149_4": "Independent_149_4", "Independent_149_5": "Independent_149_5", "Independent_150_1": "Independent_150_1", "Independent_150_2": "Independent_150_2", "Independent_150_3": "Independent_150_3", "Independent_150_4": "Independent_150_4", "Independent_150_5": "Independent_150_5", "Independent_151_1": "Independent_151_1", "Independent_151_10": "Independent_151_10", "Independent_151_11": "Independent_151_11", "Independent_151_2": "Independent_151_2", "Independent_151_3": "Independent_151_3", "Independent_151_4": "Independent_151_4", "Independent_151_5": "Independent_151_5", "Independent_151_6": "Independent_151_6", "Independent_151_7": "Independent_151_7", "Independent_151_8": "Independent_151_8", "Independent_151_9": "Independent_151_9", "Independent_152_1": "Independent_152_1", "Independent_152_10": "Independent_152_10", "Independent_152_2": "Independent_152_2", "Independent_152_3": "Independent_152_3", "Independent_152_4": "Independent_152_4", "Independent_152_5": "Independent_152_5", "Independent_152_6": "Independent_152_6", "Independent_152_7": "Independent_152_7", "Independent_152_8": "Independent_152_8", "Independent_152_9": "Independent_152_9", "Independent_153_1": "Independent_153_1", "Independent_153_10": "Independent_153_10", "Independent_153_2": "Independent_153_2", "Independent_153_3": "Independent_153_3", "Independent_153_4": "Independent_153_4", "Independent_153_5": "Independent_153_5", "Independent_153_6": "Independent_153_6", "Independent_153_7": "Independent_153_7", "Independent_153_8": "Independent_153_8", "Independent_153_9": "Independent_153_9", "Independent_154_1": "Independent_154_1", "Independent_154_2": "Independent_154_2", "Independent_154_3": "Independent_154_3", "Independent_154_4": "Independent_154_4", "Independent_155_1": "Independent_155_1", "Independent_155_2": "Independent_155_2", "Independent_155_3": "Independent_155_3", "Independent_155_4": "Independent_155_4", "Independent_155_5": "Independent_155_5", "Independent_155_6": "Independent_155_6", "Independent_155_7": "Independent_155_7", "Independent_155_8": "Independent_155_8", "Independent_156_1": "Independent_156_1", "Independent_156_2": "Independent_156_2", "Independent_156_3": "Independent_156_3", "Independent_157_1": "Independent_157_1", "Independent_157_2": "Independent_157_2", "Independent_157_3": "Independent_157_3", "Independent_157_4": "Independent_157_4", "Independent_158_1": "Independent_158_1", "Independent_158_10": "Independent_158_10", "Independent_158_11": "Independent_158_11", "Independent_158_12": "Independent_158_12", "Independent_158_13": "Independent_158_13", "Independent_158_2": "Independent_158_2", "Independent_158_3": "Independent_158_3", "Independent_158_4": "Independent_158_4", "Independent_158_5": "Independent_158_5", "Independent_158_6": "Independent_158_6", "Independent_158_7": "Independent_158_7", "Independent_158_8": "Independent_158_8", "Independent_158_9": "Independent_158_9", "Independent_159_1": "Independent_159_1", "Independent_159_2": "Independent_159_2", "Independent_159_3": "Independent_159_3", "Independent_159_4": "Independent_159_4", "Independent_160_1": "Independent_160_1", "Independent_160_2": "Independent_160_2", "Independent_160_3": "Independent_160_3", "Independent_160_4": "Independent_160_4", "Independent_160_5": "Independent_160_5", "Independent_161_1": "Independent_161_1", "Independent_161_2": "Independent_161_2", "Independent_161_3": "Independent_161_3", "Independent_162_1": "Independent_162_1", "Independent_162_2": "Independent_162_2", "Independent_162_3": "Independent_162_3", "Independent_162_4": "Independent_162_4", "Independent_162_5": "Independent_162_5", "Independent_163_1": "Independent_163_1", "Independent_163_10": "Independent_163_10", "Independent_163_2": "Independent_163_2", "Independent_163_3": "Independent_163_3", "Independent_163_4": "Independent_163_4", "Independent_163_5": "Independent_163_5", "Independent_163_6": "Independent_163_6", "Independent_163_7": "Independent_163_7", "Independent_163_8": "Independent_163_8", "Independent_163_9": "Independent_163_9", "Independent_164_1": "Independent_164_1", "Independent_164_2": "Independent_164_2", "Independent_164_3": "Independent_164_3", "Independent_164_4": "Independent_164_4", "Independent_165_1": "Independent_165_1", "Independent_165_2": "Independent_165_2", "Independent_165_3": "Independent_165_3", "Independent_165_4": "Independent_165_4", "Independent_165_5": "Independent_165_5", "Independent_166_1": "Independent_166_1", "Independent_166_2": "Independent_166_2", "Independent_166_3": "Independent_166_3", "Independent_166_4": "Independent_166_4", "Independent_166_5": "Independent_166_5", "Independent_166_6": "Independent_166_6", "Independent_166_7": "Independent_166_7", "Independent_166_8": "Independent_166_8", "Independent_167_1": "Independent_167_1", "Independent_167_2": "Independent_167_2", "Independent_167_3": "Independent_167_3", "Independent_167_4": "Independent_167_4", "Independent_168_1": "Independent_168_1", "Independent_168_10": "Independent_168_10", "Independent_168_11": "Independent_168_11", "Independent_168_2": "Independent_168_2", "Independent_168_3": "Independent_168_3", "Independent_168_4": "Independent_168_4", "Independent_168_5": "Independent_168_5", "Independent_168_6": "Independent_168_6", "Independent_168_7": "Independent_168_7", "Independent_168_8": "Independent_168_8", "Independent_168_9": "Independent_168_9", "Independent_169_1": "Independent_169_1", "Independent_169_10": "Independent_169_10", "Independent_169_11": "Independent_169_11", "Independent_169_12": "Independent_169_12", "Independent_169_13": "Independent_169_13", "Independent_169_14": "Independent_169_14", "Independent_169_15": "Independent_169_15", "Independent_169_16": "Independent_169_16", "Independent_169_17": "Independent_169_17", "Independent_169_18": "Independent_169_18", "Independent_169_19": "Independent_169_19", "Independent_169_2": "Independent_169_2", "Independent_169_3": "Independent_169_3", "Independent_169_4": "Independent_169_4", "Independent_169_5": "Independent_169_5", "Independent_169_6": "Independent_169_6", "Independent_169_7": "Independent_169_7", "Independent_169_8": "Independent_169_8", "Independent_169_9": "Independent_169_9", "Independent_170_1": "Independent_170_1", "Independent_170_2": "Independent_170_2", "Independent_170_3": "Independent_170_3", "Independent_170_4": "Independent_170_4", "Independent_170_5": "Independent_170_5", "Independent_171_1": "Independent_171_1", "Independent_171_2": "Independent_171_2", "Independent_171_3": "Independent_171_3", "Independent_171_4": "Independent_171_4", "Independent_171_5": "Independent_171_5", "Independent_171_6": "Independent_171_6", "Independent_171_7": "Independent_171_7", "Independent_171_8": "Independent_171_8", "Independent_172_1": "Independent_172_1", "Independent_172_2": "Independent_172_2", "Independent_172_3": "Independent_172_3", "Independent_172_4": "Independent_172_4", "Independent_172_5": "Independent_172_5", "Independent_173_1": "Independent_173_1", "Independent_173_2": "Independent_173_2", "Independent_173_3": "Independent_173_3", "Independent_173_4": "Independent_173_4", "Independent_173_5": "Independent_173_5", "Independent_173_6": "Independent_173_6", "Independent_173_7": "Independent_173_7", "Independent_173_8": "Independent_173_8", "Independent_173_9": "Independent_173_9", "Independent_174_1": "Independent_174_1", "Independent_174_2": "Independent_174_2", "Independent_174_3": "Independent_174_3", "Independent_174_4": "Independent_174_4", "Independent_174_5": "Independent_174_5", "Independent_175_1": "Independent_175_1", "Independent_175_10": "Independent_175_10", "Independent_175_11": "Independent_175_11", "Independent_175_2": "Independent_175_2", "Independent_175_3": "Independent_175_3", "Independent_175_4": "Independent_175_4", "Independent_175_5": "Independent_175_5", "Independent_175_6": "Independent_175_6", "Independent_175_7": "Independent_175_7", "Independent_175_8": "Independent_175_8", "Independent_175_9": "Independent_175_9", "Independent_176_1": "Independent_176_1", "Independent_176_2": "Independent_176_2", "Independent_176_3": "Independent_176_3", "Independent_176_4": "Independent_176_4", "Independent_176_5": "Independent_176_5", "Independent_176_6": "Independent_176_6", "Independent_176_7": "Independent_176_7", "Independent_177_1": "Independent_177_1", "Independent_177_2": "Independent_177_2", "Independent_177_3": "Independent_177_3", "Independent_177_4": "Independent_177_4", "Independent_178_1": "Independent_178_1", "Independent_178_2": "Independent_178_2", "Independent_178_3": "Independent_178_3", "Independent_178_4": "Independent_178_4", "Independent_178_5": "Independent_178_5", "Independent_178_6": "Independent_178_6", "Independent_178_7": "Independent_178_7", "Independent_178_8": "Independent_178_8", "Independent_179_1": "Independent_179_1", "Independent_179_2": "Independent_179_2", "Independent_179_3": "Independent_179_3", "Independent_179_4": "Independent_179_4", "Independent_180_1": "Independent_180_1", "Independent_180_2": "Independent_180_2", "Independent_180_3": "Independent_180_3", "Independent_180_4": "Independent_180_4", "Independent_180_5": "Independent_180_5", "Independent_181_1": "Independent_181_1", "Independent_181_2": "Independent_181_2", "Independent_181_3": "Independent_181_3", "Independent_182_1": "Independent_182_1", "Independent_182_2": "Independent_182_2", "Independent_182_3": "Independent_182_3", "Independent_182_4": "Independent_182_4", "Independent_182_5": "Independent_182_5", "Independent_183_1": "Independent_183_1", "Independent_183_2": "Independent_183_2", "Independent_183_3": "Independent_183_3", "Independent_183_4": "Independent_183_4", "Independent_183_5": "Independent_183_5", "Independent_183_6": "Independent_183_6", "Independent_183_7": "Independent_183_7", "Independent_183_8": "Independent_183_8", "Independent_183_9": "Independent_183_9", "Independent_184_1": "Independent_184_1", "Independent_184_2": "Independent_184_2", "Independent_184_3": "Independent_184_3", "Independent_184_4": "Independent_184_4", "Independent_184_5": "Independent_184_5", "Independent_184_6": "Independent_184_6", "Independent_185_1": "Independent_185_1", "Independent_185_2": "Independent_185_2", "Independent_185_3": "Independent_185_3", "Independent_185_4": "Independent_185_4", "Independent_185_5": "Independent_185_5", "Independent_185_6": "Independent_185_6", "Independent_186_1": "Independent_186_1", "Independent_186_2": "Independent_186_2", "Independent_186_3": "Independent_186_3", "Independent_186_4": "Independent_186_4", "Independent_186_5": "Independent_186_5", "Independent_187_1": "Independent_187_1", "Independent_187_2": "Independent_187_2", "Independent_187_3": "Independent_187_3", "Independent_187_4": "Independent_187_4", "Independent_187_5": "Independent_187_5", "Independent_187_6": "Independent_187_6", "Independent_188_1": "Independent_188_1", "Independent_188_2": "Independent_188_2", "Independent_188_3": "Independent_188_3", "Independent_188_4": "Independent_188_4", "Independent_188_5": "Independent_188_5", "Independent_188_6": "Independent_188_6", "Independent_189_1": "Independent_189_1", "Independent_189_2": "Independent_189_2", "Independent_189_3": "Independent_189_3", "Independent_189_4": "Independent_189_4", "Independent_189_5": "Independent_189_5", "Independent_189_6": "Independent_189_6", "Independent_189_7": "Independent_189_7", "Independent_189_8": "Independent_189_8", "Independent_190_1": "Independent_190_1", "Independent_190_2": "Independent_190_2", "Independent_190_3": "Independent_190_3", "Independent_190_4": "Independent_190_4", "Independent_190_5": "Independent_190_5", "Independent_191_1": "Independent_191_1", "Independent_191_2": "Independent_191_2", "Independent_191_3": "Independent_191_3", "Independent_191_4": "Independent_191_4", "Independent_191_5": "Independent_191_5", "Independent_192_1": "Independent_192_1", "Independent_192_2": "Independent_192_2", "Independent_192_3": "Independent_192_3", "Independent_192_4": "Independent_192_4", "Independent_192_5": "Independent_192_5", "Independent_192_6": "Independent_192_6", "Independent_195_1": "Independent_195_1", "Independent_195_2": "Independent_195_2", "Independent_196_1": "Independent_196_1", "Independent_196_2": "Independent_196_2", "Independent_196_3": "Independent_196_3", "Independent_196_4": "Independent_196_4", "Independent_197_1": "Independent_197_1", "Independent_197_2": "Independent_197_2", "Independent_197_3": "Independent_197_3", "Independent_199_1": "Independent_199_1", "Independent_199_2": "Independent_199_2", "Independent_199_3": "Independent_199_3", "Independent_200_1": "Independent_200_1", "Independent_200_2": "Independent_200_2", "Independent_201_1": "Independent_201_1", "Independent_201_2": "Independent_201_2", "Independent_202_1": "Independent_202_1", "Independent_203_1": "Independent_203_1", "Independent_203_2": "Independent_203_2", "Independent_203_3": "Independent_203_3", "Independent_203_4": "Independent_203_4", "Independent_205_1": "Independent_205_1", "Independent_206_1": "Independent_206_1", "Independent_206_2": "Independent_206_2", "Independent_206_3": "Independent_206_3", "Independent_206_4": "Independent_206_4", "Independent_207_1": "Independent_207_1", "Independent_207_2": "Independent_207_2", "Independent_207_3": "Independent_207_3", "Independent_208_1": "Independent_208_1", "Independent_208_2": "Independent_208_2", "Independent_208_3": "Independent_208_3", "Independent_208_4": "Independent_208_4", "Independent_208_5": "Independent_208_5", "Independent_209_1": "Independent_209_1", "Independent_209_2": "Independent_209_2", "Independent_210_1": "Independent_210_1", "Independent_210_2": "Independent_210_2", "Independent_211_1": "Independent_211_1", "Independent_211_2": "Independent_211_2", "Independent_211_3": "Independent_211_3", "Independent_212_1": "Independent_212_1", "Independent_212_2": "Independent_212_2", "Independent_212_3": "Independent_212_3", "Independent_212_4": "Independent_212_4", "Independent_212_5": "Independent_212_5", "Independent_212_6": "Independent_212_6", "Independent_212_7": "Independent_212_7", "Independent_212_8": "Independent_212_8", "Independent_213_1": "Independent_213_1", "Independent_214_1": "Independent_214_1", "Independent_214_2": "Independent_214_2", "Independent_214_3": "Independent_214_3", "Independent_214_4": "Independent_214_4", "Independent_215_1": "Independent_215_1", "Independent_215_2": "Independent_215_2", "Independent_215_3": "Independent_215_3", "Independent_215_4": "Independent_215_4", "Independent_215_5": "Independent_215_5", "Independent_215_6": "Independent_215_6", "Independent_215_7": "Independent_215_7", "Independent_215_8": "Independent_215_8", "Independent_215_9": "Independent_215_9", "Independent_216_1": "Independent_216_1", "Independent_216_10": "Independent_216_10", "Independent_216_2": "Independent_216_2", "Independent_216_3": "Independent_216_3", "Independent_216_4": "Independent_216_4", "Independent_216_5": "Independent_216_5", "Independent_216_6": "Independent_216_6", "Independent_216_7": "Independent_216_7", "Independent_216_8": "Independent_216_8", "Independent_216_9": "Independent_216_9", "Independent_217_1": "Independent_217_1", "Independent_217_2": "Independent_217_2", "Independent_217_3": "Independent_217_3", "Independent_217_4": "Independent_217_4", "Independent_217_5": "Independent_217_5", "Independent_217_6": "Independent_217_6", "Independent_217_7": "Independent_217_7", "Independent_218_1": "Independent_218_1", "Independent_218_2": "Independent_218_2", "Independent_218_3": "Independent_218_3", "Independent_218_4": "Independent_218_4", "Independent_218_5": "Independent_218_5", "Independent_218_6": "Independent_218_6", "Independent_219_1": "Independent_219_1", "Independent_219_10": "Independent_219_10", "Independent_219_11": "Independent_219_11", "Independent_219_12": "Independent_219_12", "Independent_219_2": "Independent_219_2", "Independent_219_3": "Independent_219_3", "Independent_219_4": "Independent_219_4", "Independent_219_5": "Independent_219_5", "Independent_219_6": "Independent_219_6", "Independent_219_7": "Independent_219_7", "Independent_219_8": "Independent_219_8", "Independent_219_9": "Independent_219_9", "Independent_220_1": "Independent_220_1", "Independent_220_2": "Independent_220_2", "Independent_220_3": "Independent_220_3", "Independent_220_4": "Independent_220_4", "Independent_221_1": "Independent_221_1", "Independent_221_2": "Independent_221_2", "Independent_221_3": "Independent_221_3", "Independent_221_4": "Independent_221_4", "Independent_221_5": "Independent_221_5", "Independent_221_6": "Independent_221_6", "Independent_221_7": "Independent_221_7", "Independent_222_1": "Independent_222_1", "Independent_223_1": "Independent_223_1", "Independent_223_2": "Independent_223_2", "Independent_223_3": "Independent_223_3", "Independent_223_4": "Independent_223_4", "Independent_223_5": "Independent_223_5", "Independent_223_6": "Independent_223_6", "Independent_224_1": "Independent_224_1", "Independent_224_2": "Independent_224_2", "NOTA": "NOTA", "party_AAP": "party_AAP", "party_ABHM": "party_ABHM", "party_ABML_S": "party_ABML_S", "party_ADMK": "party_ADMK", "party_AIADMK_JG": "party_AIADMK_JG", "party_AIFB": "party_AIFB", "party_AIJRP": "party_AIJRP", "party_AIMEP": "party_AIMEP", "party_AINHCP": "party_AINHCP", "party_AIUC": "party_AIUC", "party_AMKP": "party_AMKP", "party_AMPEP": "party_AMPEP", "party_ANC": "party_ANC", "party_API": "party_API", "party_ASDP": "party_ASDP", "party_ASP": "party_ASP", "party_AVIRP": "party_AVIRP", "party_BBKD": "party_BBKD", "party_BDBJP": "party_BDBJP", "party_BHPP": "party_BHPP", "party_BJP": "party_BJP", "party_BJSC": "party_BJSC", "party_BMUP": "party_BMUP", "party_BPJP": "party_BPJP", "party_BPKP": "party_BPKP", "party_BRMSC": "party_BRMSC", "party_BRPP": "party_BRPP", "party_BRP_I": "party_BRP_I", "party_BSP": "party_BSP", "party_CPI": "party_CPI", "party_CPI_ML_L": "party_CPI_ML_L", "party_CPI_M_RS": "party_CPI_M_RS", "party_CPM": "party_CPM", "party_DPPS": "party_DPPS", "party_FCI": "party_FCI", "party_GAP": "party_GAP", "party_HJP": "party_HJP", "party_INC": "party_INC", "party_INCP": "party_INCP", "party_JBJSP": "party_JBJSP", "party_JD_S": "party_JD_S", "party_JD_U": "party_JD_U", "party_JPK": "party_JPK", "party_JSMP_K": "party_JSMP_K", "party_JSTP": "party_JSTP", "party_JVBP": "party_JVBP", "party_KAP": "party_KAP", "party_KCVP": "party_KCVP", "party_KDC": "party_KDC", "party_KJP": "party_KJP", "party_KP": "party_KP", "party_KPJP": "party_KPJP", "party_KRRS": "party_KRRS", "party_KSRKP": "party_KSRKP", "party_LAD": "party_LAD", "party_NCP": "party_NCP", "party_NDEP": "party_NDEP", "party_NmC": "party_NmC", "party_PBI": "party_PBI", "party_PM": "party_PM", "party_PPOI": "party_PPOI", "party_PPP": "party_PPP", "party_PRARP": "party_PRARP", "party_PRCP": "party_PRCP", "party_PRRJP": "party_PRRJP", "party_PTSS": "party_PTSS", "party_RCMP": "party_RCMP", "party_RJSMP": "party_RJSMP", "party_RMVP": "party_RMVP", "party_RPI": "party_RPI", "party_RPI_A": "party_RPI_A", "party_RSPS": "party_RSPS", "party_SAJP_L": "party_SAJP_L", "party_SBKP": "party_SBKP", "party_SDPI": "party_SDPI", "party_SHP": "party_SHP", "party_SHS": "party_SHS", "party_SJPA": "party_SJPA", "party_SJPL": "party_SJPL", "party_SP": "party_SP", "party_SUCI": "party_SUCI", "party_SWI": "party_SWI", "party_VJCP": "party_VJCP", "party_WPOI": "party_WPOI", "party_kajp": "party_kajp", "party_rpsn": "party_rpsn"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 224, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 224, "registered_not_positive": 224}, "n_stations_flagged": 224, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:39:50.429882", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.604, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.56, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.482, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.363, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.069, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.482, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.482, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.363, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.277, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.277, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.623, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.546, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.546, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 224}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b5db9fbe288f42c6ae711352d31f2f21", "name": "India 2018 local (overnight india-rajasthan-2018-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2018, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Rajasthan/Rajasthan_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"INC": "INC", "BJP": "BJP", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "CPM": "CPM", "CPI": "CPI", "ABRJP": "ABRJP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "BSP": "BSP", "AAP": "AAP", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "SAD_A_SSM": "SAD_A_SSM", "RPI_A": "RPI_A", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "NUZP": "NUZP", "Independent_2_3": "Independent_2_3", "Independent_2_4": "Independent_2_4", "Independent_2_5": "Independent_2_5", "Independent_2_6": "Independent_2_6", "Independent_2_7": "Independent_2_7", "LJP": "LJP", "Independent_2_8": "Independent_2_8", "Independent_2_9": "Independent_2_9", "MHKRP": "MHKRP", "Independent_2_10": "Independent_2_10", "DKD": "DKD", "BLSP": "BLSP", "Independent_2_11": "Independent_2_11", "JWCP": "JWCP", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "Independent_3_3": "Independent_3_3", "Independent_3_4": "Independent_3_4", "Independent_3_5": "Independent_3_5", "Independent_3_6": "Independent_3_6", "Independent_3_7": "Independent_3_7", "Independent_3_8": "Independent_3_8", "Independent_3_9": "Independent_3_9", "Independent_3_10": "Independent_3_10", "BRPP": "BRPP", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "AINHCP": "AINHCP", "BYS": "BYS", "Independent_4_4": "Independent_4_4", "Independent_4_5": "Independent_4_5", "Independent_4_6": "Independent_4_6", "Independent_4_7": "Independent_4_7", "Independent_4_8": "Independent_4_8", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "Independent_5_2": "Independent_5_2", "Independent_5_3": "Independent_5_3", "BRSP": "BRSP", "Independent_5_4": "Independent_5_4", "Independent_5_5": "Independent_5_5", "Independent_5_6": "Independent_5_6", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "Independent_7_2": "Independent_7_2", "Independent_7_3": "Independent_7_3", "BMUP": "BMUP", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "Independent_8_3": "Independent_8_3", "RaLtP": "RaLtP", "Independent_8_4": "Independent_8_4", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "Independent_9_2": "Independent_9_2", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "BVHNP": "BVHNP", "Independent_10_3": "Independent_10_3", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "Independent_11_3": "Independent_11_3", "Independent_11_4": "Independent_11_4", "Independent_11_5": "Independent_11_5", "Independent_11_6": "Independent_11_6", "Independent_11_7": "Independent_11_7", "Independent_11_8": "Independent_11_8", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "Independent_13_3": "Independent_13_3", "Independent_13_4": "Independent_13_4", "SHS": "SHS", "ANASP": "ANASP", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "Independent_14_3": "Independent_14_3", "Independent_14_4": "Independent_14_4", "API": "API", "Independent_14_5": "Independent_14_5", "Independent_14_6": "Independent_14_6", "Independent_14_7": "Independent_14_7", "Independent_14_8": "Independent_14_8", "Independent_14_9": "Independent_14_9", "Independent_14_10": "Independent_14_10", "Independent_14_11": "Independent_14_11", "Independent_14_12": "Independent_14_12", "Independent_14_13": "Independent_14_13", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_15_2": "Independent_15_2", "NYBP": "NYBP", "Independent_15_3": "Independent_15_3", "Independent_15_4": "Independent_15_4", "Independent_15_5": "Independent_15_5", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_16_2": "Independent_16_2", "Independent_16_3": "Independent_16_3", "ASSP": "ASSP", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_18_3": "Independent_18_3", "Independent_18_4": "Independent_18_4", "Independent_18_5": "Independent_18_5", "BPCP": "BPCP", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "Independent_19_3": "Independent_19_3", "Independent_19_4": "Independent_19_4", "Independent_19_5": "Independent_19_5", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_20_2": "Independent_20_2", "KJSP": "KJSP", "Independent_20_3": "Independent_20_3", "Independent_20_4": "Independent_20_4", "Independent_20_5": "Independent_20_5", "Independent_20_6": "Independent_20_6", "Independent_20_7": "Independent_20_7", "BASD": "BASD", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_21_2": "Independent_21_2", "Independent_21_3": "Independent_21_3", "Independent_21_4": "Independent_21_4", "Independent_21_5": "Independent_21_5", "NPSF": "NPSF", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_22_2": "Independent_22_2", "Independent_22_3": "Independent_22_3", "Independent_22_4": "Independent_22_4", "Independent_22_5": "Independent_22_5", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_23_2": "Independent_23_2", "JD_U": "JD_U", "Independent_23_3": "Independent_23_3", "Independent_23_4": "Independent_23_4", "Independent_23_5": "Independent_23_5", "Independent_23_6": "Independent_23_6", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "Independent_24_2": "Independent_24_2", "Independent_24_3": "Independent_24_3", "RSVP": "RSVP", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "CPI_ML_L": "CPI_ML_L", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "BHBP": "BHBP", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "Independent_26_3": "Independent_26_3", "Independent_26_4": "Independent_26_4", "Independent_26_5": "Independent_26_5", "RAYP": "RAYP", "Independent_26_6": "Independent_26_6", "Independent_26_7": "Independent_26_7", "Independent_26_8": "Independent_26_8", "DSPVAD": "DSPVAD", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "Independent_27_3": "Independent_27_3", "Independent_27_4": "Independent_27_4", "Independent_27_5": "Independent_27_5", "Independent_27_6": "Independent_27_6", "Independent_27_7": "Independent_27_7", "Independent_27_8": "Independent_27_8", "Independent_27_9": "Independent_27_9", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "Independent_29_4": "Independent_29_4", "Independent_29_5": "Independent_29_5", "Independent_29_6": "Independent_29_6", "Independent_29_7": "Independent_29_7", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "LJD": "LJD", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "Independent_30_3": "Independent_30_3", "Independent_30_4": "Independent_30_4", "Independent_30_5": "Independent_30_5", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_31_2": "Independent_31_2", "Independent_31_3": "Independent_31_3", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_32_3": "Independent_32_3", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "Independent_33_4": "Independent_33_4", "Independent_33_5": "Independent_33_5", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_34_3": "Independent_34_3", "Independent_34_4": "Independent_34_4", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "Independent_35_2": "Independent_35_2", "Independent_35_3": "Independent_35_3", "Independent_35_4": "Independent_35_4", "IPGP": "IPGP", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_36_3": "Independent_36_3", "Independent_36_4": "Independent_36_4", "Independent_36_5": "Independent_36_5", "Independent_36_6": "Independent_36_6", "Independent_36_7": "Independent_36_7", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "Independent_37_3": "Independent_37_3", "Independent_37_4": "Independent_37_4", "Independent_37_5": "Independent_37_5", "Independent_37_6": "Independent_37_6", "Independent_37_7": "Independent_37_7", "Independent_37_8": "Independent_37_8", "Independent_37_9": "Independent_37_9", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "SWI": "SWI", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_38_3": "Independent_38_3", "Independent_38_4": "Independent_38_4", "Independent_38_5": "Independent_38_5", "Independent_38_6": "Independent_38_6", "Independent_38_7": "Independent_38_7", "Independent_38_8": "Independent_38_8", "BHTYP": "BHTYP", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_39_2": "Independent_39_2", "Independent_39_3": "Independent_39_3", "Independent_39_4": "Independent_39_4", "Independent_39_5": "Independent_39_5", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "Independent_41_3": "Independent_41_3", "Independent_41_4": "Independent_41_4", "Independent_41_5": "Independent_41_5", "Independent_41_6": "Independent_41_6", "Independent_41_7": "Independent_41_7", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_42_2": "Independent_42_2", "Independent_42_3": "Independent_42_3", "Independent_42_4": "Independent_42_4", "Independent_42_5": "Independent_42_5", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_43_2": "Independent_43_2", "Independent_43_3": "Independent_43_3", "Independent_43_4": "Independent_43_4", "Independent_43_5": "Independent_43_5", "Independent_43_6": "Independent_43_6", "Independent_43_7": "Independent_43_7", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "Independent_44_3": "Independent_44_3", "Independent_44_4": "Independent_44_4", "JGP": "JGP", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_45_2": "Independent_45_2", "ABAP": "ABAP", "KHLKP": "KHLKP", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "Independent_46_3": "Independent_46_3", "Independent_46_4": "Independent_46_4", "Independent_46_5": "Independent_46_5", "RJANP": "RJANP", "Independent_46_6": "Independent_46_6", "Independent_46_7": "Independent_46_7", "Independent_46_8": "Independent_46_8", "BJKD_D": "BJKD_D", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "Independent_47_3": "Independent_47_3", "Independent_47_4": "Independent_47_4", "Independent_47_5": "Independent_47_5", "Independent_47_6": "Independent_47_6", "PCHP": "PCHP", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_48_2": "Independent_48_2", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "Independent_49_3": "Independent_49_3", "Independent_49_4": "Independent_49_4", "Independent_49_5": "Independent_49_5", "Independent_49_6": "Independent_49_6", "Independent_49_7": "Independent_49_7", "Independent_49_8": "Independent_49_8", "JD_S": "JD_S", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_50_3": "Independent_50_3", "PTSS": "PTSS", "Independent_50_4": "Independent_50_4", "Independent_50_5": "Independent_50_5", "Independent_50_6": "Independent_50_6", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_51_3": "Independent_51_3", "HJP": "HJP", "Independent_51_4": "Independent_51_4", "Independent_51_5": "Independent_51_5", "Independent_51_6": "Independent_51_6", "Independent_51_7": "Independent_51_7", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "Independent_52_3": "Independent_52_3", "Independent_52_4": "Independent_52_4", "Independent_52_5": "Independent_52_5", "Independent_52_6": "Independent_52_6", "Independent_52_7": "Independent_52_7", "Independent_52_8": "Independent_52_8", "Independent_52_9": "Independent_52_9", "Independent_52_10": "Independent_52_10", "Independent_52_11": "Independent_52_11", "Independent_52_12": "Independent_52_12", "Independent_52_13": "Independent_52_13", "Independent_52_14": "Independent_52_14", "Independent_52_15": "Independent_52_15", "Independent_52_16": "Independent_52_16", "Independent_52_17": "Independent_52_17", "Independent_52_18": "Independent_52_18", "Independent_52_19": "Independent_52_19", "Independent_52_20": "Independent_52_20", "Independent_52_21": "Independent_52_21", "Independent_52_22": "Independent_52_22", "Independent_52_23": "Independent_52_23", "Independent_52_24": "Independent_52_24", "Independent_52_25": "Independent_52_25", "Independent_52_26": "Independent_52_26", "Independent_52_27": "Independent_52_27", "Independent_52_28": "Independent_52_28", "Independent_52_29": "Independent_52_29", "Independent_52_30": "Independent_52_30", "Independent_52_31": "Independent_52_31", "Independent_52_32": "Independent_52_32", "Independent_52_33": "Independent_52_33", "Independent_52_34": "Independent_52_34", "Independent_52_35": "Independent_52_35", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "Independent_53_2": "Independent_53_2", "Independent_53_3": "Independent_53_3", "Independent_53_4": "Independent_53_4", "Independent_53_5": "Independent_53_5", "Independent_53_6": "Independent_53_6", "Independent_53_7": "Independent_53_7", "Independent_53_8": "Independent_53_8", "Independent_53_9": "Independent_53_9", "Independent_53_10": "Independent_53_10", "Independent_53_11": "Independent_53_11", "Independent_53_12": "Independent_53_12", "Independent_53_13": "Independent_53_13", "Independent_53_14": "Independent_53_14", "Independent_53_15": "Independent_53_15", "Independent_53_16": "Independent_53_16", "Independent_53_17": "Independent_53_17", "Independent_53_18": "Independent_53_18", "Independent_53_19": "Independent_53_19", "Independent_53_20": "Independent_53_20", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_54_3": "Independent_54_3", "Independent_54_4": "Independent_54_4", "Independent_54_5": "Independent_54_5", "Independent_54_6": "Independent_54_6", "Independent_54_7": "Independent_54_7", "BHKP": "BHKP", "Independent_54_8": "Independent_54_8", "Independent_54_9": "Independent_54_9", "PPID": "PPID", "Independent_54_10": "Independent_54_10", "HSS": "HSS", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_55_2": "Independent_55_2", "BJSTP": "BJSTP", "SRVSD": "SRVSD", "Independent_55_3": "Independent_55_3", "Independent_55_4": "Independent_55_4", "BJHP": "BJHP", "Independent_55_5": "Independent_55_5", "Independent_55_6": "Independent_55_6", "Independent_55_7": "Independent_55_7", "Independent_55_8": "Independent_55_8", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_56_2": "Independent_56_2", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_57_2": "Independent_57_2", "Independent_57_3": "Independent_57_3", "Independent_57_4": "Independent_57_4", "Independent_57_5": "Independent_57_5", "JANADIP": "JANADIP", "SP": "SP", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_59_2": "Independent_59_2", "AKSMP": "AKSMP", "Independent_59_3": "Independent_59_3", "Independent_59_4": "Independent_59_4", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "Independent_61_3": "Independent_61_3", "Independent_61_4": "Independent_61_4", "Independent_61_5": "Independent_61_5", "Independent_61_6": "Independent_61_6", "Independent_61_7": "Independent_61_7", "Independent_61_8": "Independent_61_8", "Independent_61_9": "Independent_61_9", "Independent_61_10": "Independent_61_10", "Independent_61_11": "Independent_61_11", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "Independent_63_3": "Independent_63_3", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_64_2": "Independent_64_2", "Independent_64_3": "Independent_64_3", "Independent_64_4": "Independent_64_4", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_65_2": "Independent_65_2", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "ABHM": "ABHM", "Independent_66_2": "Independent_66_2", "Independent_66_3": "Independent_66_3", "Independent_66_4": "Independent_66_4", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "GGP": "GGP", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_69_3": "Independent_69_3", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "Independent_70_2": "Independent_70_2", "Independent_70_3": "Independent_70_3", "Independent_70_4": "Independent_70_4", "Independent_71_1": "Independent_71_1", "Independent_71_2": "Independent_71_2", "Independent_71_3": "Independent_71_3", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_72_2": "Independent_72_2", "Independent_72_3": "Independent_72_3", "RLD": "RLD", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "Independent_73_3": "Independent_73_3", "Independent_73_4": "Independent_73_4", "Independent_73_5": "Independent_73_5", "Independent_73_6": "Independent_73_6", "Independent_73_7": "Independent_73_7", "Independent_73_8": "Independent_73_8", "Independent_73_9": "Independent_73_9", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_74_2": "Independent_74_2", "Independent_74_3": "Independent_74_3", "Independent_74_4": "Independent_74_4", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_77_2": "Independent_77_2", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_78_2": "Independent_78_2", "Independent_78_3": "Independent_78_3", "Independent_78_4": "Independent_78_4", "Independent_78_5": "Independent_78_5", "Independent_78_6": "Independent_78_6", "Independent_79_1": "Independent_79_1", "Independent_79_2": "Independent_79_2", "Independent_79_3": "Independent_79_3", "Independent_79_4": "Independent_79_4", "Independent_79_5": "Independent_79_5", "Independent_79_6": "Independent_79_6", "Independent_79_7": "Independent_79_7", "Independent_79_8": "Independent_79_8", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_80_2": "Independent_80_2", "Independent_80_3": "Independent_80_3", "Independent_80_4": "Independent_80_4", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "Independent_81_2": "Independent_81_2", "Independent_81_3": "Independent_81_3", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_83_2": "Independent_83_2", "Independent_83_3": "Independent_83_3", "Independent_83_4": "Independent_83_4", "Independent_83_5": "Independent_83_5", "Independent_83_6": "Independent_83_6", "Independent_84_1": "Independent_84_1", "Independent_84_2": "Independent_84_2", "Independent_84_3": "Independent_84_3", "Independent_84_4": "Independent_84_4", "Independent_84_5": "Independent_84_5", "Independent_84_6": "Independent_84_6", "Independent_85_1": "Independent_85_1", "Independent_85_2": "Independent_85_2", "Independent_85_3": "Independent_85_3", "Independent_85_4": "Independent_85_4", "Independent_85_5": "Independent_85_5", "Independent_85_6": "Independent_85_6", "Independent_85_7": "Independent_85_7", "Independent_85_8": "Independent_85_8", "Independent_86_1": "Independent_86_1", "Independent_86_2": "Independent_86_2", "Independent_86_3": "Independent_86_3", "Independent_86_4": "Independent_86_4", "Independent_86_5": "Independent_86_5", "Independent_86_6": "Independent_86_6", "Independent_86_7": "Independent_86_7", "Independent_88_1": "Independent_88_1", "Independent_88_2": "Independent_88_2", "Independent_88_3": "Independent_88_3", "Independent_88_4": "Independent_88_4", "Independent_90_1": "Independent_90_1", "Independent_90_2": "Independent_90_2", "Independent_90_3": "Independent_90_3", "Independent_90_4": "Independent_90_4", "Independent_90_5": "Independent_90_5", "Independent_90_6": "Independent_90_6", "Independent_90_7": "Independent_90_7", "Independent_91_1": "Independent_91_1", "Independent_91_2": "Independent_91_2", "Independent_91_3": "Independent_91_3", "Independent_92_1": "Independent_92_1", "Independent_92_2": "Independent_92_2", "Independent_92_3": "Independent_92_3", "Independent_92_4": "Independent_92_4", "Independent_92_5": "Independent_92_5", "Independent_92_6": "Independent_92_6", "Independent_92_7": "Independent_92_7", "Independent_93_1": "Independent_93_1", "Independent_93_2": "Independent_93_2", "Independent_94_1": "Independent_94_1", "Independent_94_2": "Independent_94_2", "Independent_94_3": "Independent_94_3", "INCP": "INCP", "Independent_95_1": "Independent_95_1", "Independent_96_1": "Independent_96_1", "Independent_96_2": "Independent_96_2", "Independent_97_1": "Independent_97_1", "Independent_97_2": "Independent_97_2", "Independent_98_1": "Independent_98_1", "Independent_98_2": "Independent_98_2", "Independent_98_3": "Independent_98_3", "Independent_98_4": "Independent_98_4", "Independent_98_5": "Independent_98_5", "Independent_98_6": "Independent_98_6", "Independent_98_7": "Independent_98_7", "Independent_98_8": "Independent_98_8", "Independent_99_1": "Independent_99_1", "Independent_99_2": "Independent_99_2", "Independent_99_3": "Independent_99_3", "Independent_99_4": "Independent_99_4", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_100_2": "Independent_100_2", "NFTP": "NFTP", "Independent_100_3": "Independent_100_3", "Independent_100_4": "Independent_100_4", "Independent_100_5": "Independent_100_5", "Independent_101_1": "Independent_101_1", "BPULP": "BPULP", "Independent_102_1": "Independent_102_1", "Independent_102_2": "Independent_102_2", "Independent_102_3": "Independent_102_3", "Independent_102_4": "Independent_102_4", "Independent_102_5": "Independent_102_5", "Independent_102_6": "Independent_102_6", "Independent_102_7": "Independent_102_7", "Independent_102_8": "Independent_102_8", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_103_2": "Independent_103_2", "Independent_103_3": "Independent_103_3", "Independent_103_4": "Independent_103_4", "Independent_103_5": "Independent_103_5", "Independent_103_6": "Independent_103_6", "Independent_104_1": "Independent_104_1", "Independent_104_2": "Independent_104_2", "Independent_104_3": "Independent_104_3", "Independent_105_1": "Independent_105_1", "Independent_105_2": "Independent_105_2", "Independent_105_3": "Independent_105_3", "Independent_105_4": "Independent_105_4", "Independent_106_1": "Independent_106_1", "Independent_106_2": "Independent_106_2", "Independent_106_3": "Independent_106_3", "Independent_106_4": "Independent_106_4", "Independent_106_5": "Independent_106_5", "Independent_106_6": "Independent_106_6", "Independent_106_7": "Independent_106_7", "Independent_106_8": "Independent_106_8", "Independent_107_1": "Independent_107_1", "Independent_107_2": "Independent_107_2", "Independent_107_3": "Independent_107_3", "Independent_107_4": "Independent_107_4", "Independent_108_1": "Independent_108_1", "Independent_108_2": "Independent_108_2", "Independent_109_1": "Independent_109_1", "Independent_109_2": "Independent_109_2", "Independent_109_3": "Independent_109_3", "Independent_109_4": "Independent_109_4", "SP_MP": "SP_MP", "Independent_110_1": "Independent_110_1", "Independent_110_2": "Independent_110_2", "Independent_110_3": "Independent_110_3", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "Independent_112_1": "Independent_112_1", "Independent_112_2": "Independent_112_2", "Independent_112_3": "Independent_112_3", "ANJUP": "ANJUP", "Independent_113_1": "Independent_113_1", "Independent_113_2": "Independent_113_2", "Independent_113_3": "Independent_113_3", "Independent_113_4": "Independent_113_4", "Independent_113_5": "Independent_113_5", "Independent_113_6": "Independent_113_6", "Independent_113_7": "Independent_113_7", "Independent_114_1": "Independent_114_1", "Independent_114_2": "Independent_114_2", "Independent_114_3": "Independent_114_3", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_115_2": "Independent_115_2", "Independent_115_3": "Independent_115_3", "Independent_115_4": "Independent_115_4", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "Independent_116_2": "Independent_116_2", "Independent_116_3": "Independent_116_3", "Independent_116_4": "Independent_116_4", "Independent_116_5": "Independent_116_5", "Independent_116_6": "Independent_116_6", "Independent_116_7": "Independent_116_7", "Independent_116_8": "Independent_116_8", "HCP": "HCP", "Independent_116_9": "Independent_116_9", "Independent_116_10": "Independent_116_10", "Independent_117_1": "Independent_117_1", "Independent_117_2": "Independent_117_2", "Independent_117_3": "Independent_117_3", "Independent_117_4": "Independent_117_4", "Independent_117_5": "Independent_117_5", "Independent_117_6": "Independent_117_6", "IIC_R": "IIC_R", "Independent_117_7": "Independent_117_7", "Independent_117_8": "Independent_117_8", "Independent_118_1": "Independent_118_1", "Independent_118_2": "Independent_118_2", "Independent_118_3": "Independent_118_3", "Independent_119_1": "Independent_119_1", "Independent_119_2": "Independent_119_2", "Independent_119_3": "Independent_119_3", "Independent_119_4": "Independent_119_4", "Independent_119_5": "Independent_119_5", "AVIRP": "AVIRP", "NCP": "NCP", "Independent_120_1": "Independent_120_1", "Independent_120_2": "Independent_120_2", "Independent_120_3": "Independent_120_3", "Independent_120_4": "Independent_120_4", "Independent_120_5": "Independent_120_5", "RSPS": "RSPS", "Independent_121_1": "Independent_121_1", "Independent_121_2": "Independent_121_2", "Independent_121_3": "Independent_121_3", "Independent_122_1": "Independent_122_1", "Independent_122_2": "Independent_122_2", "Independent_122_3": "Independent_122_3", "Independent_123_1": "Independent_123_1", "Independent_123_2": "Independent_123_2", "Independent_123_3": "Independent_123_3", "Independent_124_1": "Independent_124_1", "Independent_124_2": "Independent_124_2", "Independent_125_1": "Independent_125_1", "Independent_125_2": "Independent_125_2", "Independent_126_1": "Independent_126_1", "Independent_126_2": "Independent_126_2", "Independent_127_1": "Independent_127_1", "Independent_127_2": "Independent_127_2", "Independent_127_3": "Independent_127_3", "Independent_127_4": "Independent_127_4", "Independent_127_5": "Independent_127_5", "Independent_127_6": "Independent_127_6", "Independent_127_7": "Independent_127_7", "Independent_127_8": "Independent_127_8", "Independent_127_9": "Independent_127_9", "Independent_127_10": "Independent_127_10", "Independent_128_1": "Independent_128_1", "Independent_128_2": "Independent_128_2", "Independent_128_3": "Independent_128_3", "Independent_128_4": "Independent_128_4", "Independent_128_5": "Independent_128_5", "Independent_128_6": "Independent_128_6", "Independent_128_7": "Independent_128_7", "PLBP": "PLBP", "Independent_129_1": "Independent_129_1", "Independent_129_2": "Independent_129_2", "Independent_129_3": "Independent_129_3", "Independent_129_4": "Independent_129_4", "Independent_129_5": "Independent_129_5", "Independent_129_6": "Independent_129_6", "Independent_129_7": "Independent_129_7", "RPI_R": "RPI_R", "Independent_129_8": "Independent_129_8", "Independent_130_1": "Independent_130_1", "Independent_130_2": "Independent_130_2", "Independent_131_1": "Independent_131_1", "Independent_132_1": "Independent_132_1", "Independent_132_2": "Independent_132_2", "Independent_133_1": "Independent_133_1", "Independent_133_2": "Independent_133_2", "Independent_135_1": "Independent_135_1", "Independent_135_2": "Independent_135_2", "Independent_135_3": "Independent_135_3", "Independent_136_1": "Independent_136_1", "Independent_136_2": "Independent_136_2", "RAJPA": "RAJPA", "Independent_137_1": "Independent_137_1", "Independent_137_2": "Independent_137_2", "Independent_137_3": "Independent_137_3", "Independent_138_1": "Independent_138_1", "Independent_138_2": "Independent_138_2", "Independent_138_3": "Independent_138_3", "Independent_138_4": "Independent_138_4", "Independent_138_5": "Independent_138_5", "Independent_138_6": "Independent_138_6", "Independent_138_7": "Independent_138_7", "Independent_139_1": "Independent_139_1", "Independent_141_1": "Independent_141_1", "Independent_141_2": "Independent_141_2", "Independent_141_3": "Independent_141_3", "Independent_141_4": "Independent_141_4", "Independent_143_1": "Independent_143_1", "Independent_143_2": "Independent_143_2", "Independent_143_3": "Independent_143_3", "Independent_143_4": "Independent_143_4", "Independent_143_5": "Independent_143_5", "Independent_144_1": "Independent_144_1", "Independent_144_2": "Independent_144_2", "Independent_144_3": "Independent_144_3", "Independent_144_4": "Independent_144_4", "Independent_145_1": "Independent_145_1", "Independent_145_2": "Independent_145_2", "Independent_145_3": "Independent_145_3", "Independent_146_1": "Independent_146_1", "Independent_146_2": "Independent_146_2", "HND": "HND", "Independent_146_3": "Independent_146_3", "Independent_146_4": "Independent_146_4", "Independent_146_5": "Independent_146_5", "Independent_146_6": "Independent_146_6", "Independent_146_7": "Independent_146_7", "BTP": "BTP", "Independent_147_1": "Independent_147_1", "Independent_147_2": "Independent_147_2", "Independent_147_3": "Independent_147_3", "Independent_147_4": "Independent_147_4", "Independent_148_1": "Independent_148_1", "Independent_149_1": "Independent_149_1", "Independent_149_2": "Independent_149_2", "JNSR": "JNSR", "Independent_150_1": "Independent_150_1", "Independent_153_1": "Independent_153_1", "Independent_153_2": "Independent_153_2", "Independent_153_3": "Independent_153_3", "Independent_153_4": "Independent_153_4", "Independent_154_1": "Independent_154_1", "Independent_155_1": "Independent_155_1", "Independent_155_2": "Independent_155_2", "Independent_156_1": "Independent_156_1", "Independent_158_1": "Independent_158_1", "Independent_159_1": "Independent_159_1", "Independent_160_1": "Independent_160_1", "Independent_160_2": "Independent_160_2", "Independent_161_1": "Independent_161_1", "Independent_161_2": "Independent_161_2", "Independent_161_3": "Independent_161_3", "Independent_162_1": "Independent_162_1", "Independent_162_2": "Independent_162_2", "Independent_162_3": "Independent_162_3", "Independent_164_1": "Independent_164_1", "Independent_164_2": "Independent_164_2", "Independent_165_1": "Independent_165_1", "Independent_165_2": "Independent_165_2", "Independent_166_1": "Independent_166_1", "Independent_166_2": "Independent_166_2", "Independent_166_3": "Independent_166_3", "Independent_166_4": "Independent_166_4", "Independent_167_1": "Independent_167_1", "Independent_168_1": "Independent_168_1", "Independent_169_1": "Independent_169_1", "Independent_169_2": "Independent_169_2", "Independent_169_3": "Independent_169_3", "Independent_170_1": "Independent_170_1", "Independent_170_2": "Independent_170_2", "Independent_170_3": "Independent_170_3", "Independent_170_4": "Independent_170_4", "Independent_171_1": "Independent_171_1", "Independent_171_2": "Independent_171_2", "Independent_171_3": "Independent_171_3", "Independent_171_4": "Independent_171_4", "UNP": "UNP", "Independent_172_1": "Independent_172_1", "Independent_172_2": "Independent_172_2", "Independent_173_1": "Independent_173_1", "Independent_173_2": "Independent_173_2", "Independent_173_3": "Independent_173_3", "Independent_173_4": "Independent_173_4", "Independent_173_5": "Independent_173_5", "Independent_173_6": "Independent_173_6", "Independent_173_7": "Independent_173_7", "Independent_174_1": "Independent_174_1", "Independent_174_2": "Independent_174_2", "Independent_174_3": "Independent_174_3", "Independent_174_4": "Independent_174_4", "Independent_175_1": "Independent_175_1", "Independent_175_2": "Independent_175_2", "Independent_175_3": "Independent_175_3", "Independent_176_1": "Independent_176_1", "Independent_176_2": "Independent_176_2", "Independent_176_3": "Independent_176_3", "MNP": "MNP", "RKSP": "RKSP", "ASP": "ASP", "Independent_177_1": "Independent_177_1", "Independent_178_1": "Independent_178_1", "Independent_178_2": "Independent_178_2", "Independent_178_3": "Independent_178_3", "Independent_178_4": "Independent_178_4", "Independent_178_5": "Independent_178_5", "Independent_179_1": "Independent_179_1", "Independent_179_2": "Independent_179_2", "Independent_179_3": "Independent_179_3", "Independent_179_4": "Independent_179_4", "Independent_180_1": "Independent_180_1", "SDPI": "SDPI", "Independent_180_2": "Independent_180_2", "Independent_180_3": "Independent_180_3", "Independent_180_4": "Independent_180_4", "Independent_180_5": "Independent_180_5", "Independent_180_6": "Independent_180_6", "Independent_180_7": "Independent_180_7", "Independent_180_8": "Independent_180_8", "Independent_181_1": "Independent_181_1", "Independent_181_2": "Independent_181_2", "Independent_181_3": "Independent_181_3", "Independent_181_4": "Independent_181_4", "Independent_181_5": "Independent_181_5", "Independent_182_1": "Independent_182_1", "Independent_182_2": "Independent_182_2", "Independent_183_1": "Independent_183_1", "Independent_183_2": "Independent_183_2", "Independent_183_3": "Independent_183_3", "Independent_183_4": "Independent_183_4", "Independent_183_5": "Independent_183_5", "Independent_183_6": "Independent_183_6", "Independent_183_7": "Independent_183_7", "Independent_183_8": "Independent_183_8", "Independent_184_1": "Independent_184_1", "Independent_184_2": "Independent_184_2", "IVD": "IVD", "RMKP": "RMKP", "Independent_185_1": "Independent_185_1", "Independent_185_2": "Independent_185_2", "Independent_185_3": "Independent_185_3", "Independent_186_1": "Independent_186_1", "Independent_186_2": "Independent_186_2", "Independent_186_3": "Independent_186_3", "Independent_186_4": "Independent_186_4", "Independent_186_5": "Independent_186_5", "Independent_186_6": "Independent_186_6", "Independent_186_7": "Independent_186_7", "Independent_186_8": "Independent_186_8", "Independent_186_9": "Independent_186_9", "Independent_187_1": "Independent_187_1", "Independent_188_1": "Independent_188_1", "Independent_188_2": "Independent_188_2", "WPOI": "WPOI", "Independent_189_1": "Independent_189_1", "Independent_189_2": "Independent_189_2", "Independent_189_3": "Independent_189_3", "Independent_189_4": "Independent_189_4", "Independent_190_1": "Independent_190_1", "Independent_190_2": "Independent_190_2", "Independent_190_3": "Independent_190_3", "Independent_190_4": "Independent_190_4", "Independent_190_5": "Independent_190_5", "Independent_190_6": "Independent_190_6", "Independent_190_7": "Independent_190_7", "Independent_190_8": "Independent_190_8", "Independent_191_1": "Independent_191_1", "Independent_191_2": "Independent_191_2", "Independent_193_1": "Independent_193_1", "Independent_193_2": "Independent_193_2", "Independent_193_3": "Independent_193_3", "Independent_194_1": "Independent_194_1", "Independent_195_1": "Independent_195_1", "Independent_195_2": "Independent_195_2", "Independent_196_1": "Independent_196_1", "Independent_196_2": "Independent_196_2", "Independent_198_1": "Independent_198_1", "Independent_198_2": "Independent_198_2", "Independent_198_3": "Independent_198_3", "Independent_198_4": "Independent_198_4", "Independent_199_1": "Independent_199_1", "Independent_199_2": "Independent_199_2", "Independent_199_3": "Independent_199_3", "Independent_199_4": "Independent_199_4", "Independent_200_1": "Independent_200_1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 199, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 199, "registered_not_positive": 199}, "n_stations_flagged": 199, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:39:42.474237", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.604, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.56, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.482, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.363, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.069, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.482, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.482, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.363, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.277, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.277, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.623, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.546, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.546, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 199}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0d2e79d0318848738fafefad589f84a8", "name": "India 2017 local (overnight india-gujarat-2017-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2017, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Gujarat/Gujarat_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AAAP": "AAAP", "ABCD(A)": "ABCD(A)", "ABHM": "ABHM", "ADPT": "ADPT", "AINHCP": "AINHCP", "AKHP": "AKHP", "ASAPA": "ASAPA", "ASP": "ASP", "BARESP": "BARESP", "BBC": "BBC", "BHARP": "BHARP", "BJP": "BJP", "BMUP": "BMUP", "BNJD": "BNJD", "BRP": "BRP", "BSAP": "BSAP", "BSDL": "BSDL", "BSP": "BSP", "BTP": "BTP", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "CPM": "CPM", "DBSP": "DBSP", "GJCP": "GJCP", "INC": "INC", "INCP": "INCP", "INL": "INL", "ISP": "ISP", "Independent_001_1": "Independent_001_1", "Independent_001_2": "Independent_001_2", "Independent_001_3": "Independent_001_3", "Independent_001_4": "Independent_001_4", "Independent_001_5": "Independent_001_5", "Independent_002_1": "Independent_002_1", "Independent_002_10": "Independent_002_10", "Independent_002_11": "Independent_002_11", "Independent_002_2": "Independent_002_2", "Independent_002_3": "Independent_002_3", "Independent_002_4": "Independent_002_4", "Independent_002_5": "Independent_002_5", "Independent_002_6": "Independent_002_6", "Independent_002_7": "Independent_002_7", "Independent_002_8": "Independent_002_8", "Independent_002_9": "Independent_002_9", "Independent_003_1": "Independent_003_1", "Independent_003_2": "Independent_003_2", "Independent_003_3": "Independent_003_3", "Independent_003_4": "Independent_003_4", "Independent_003_5": "Independent_003_5", "Independent_003_6": "Independent_003_6", "Independent_003_7": "Independent_003_7", "Independent_003_8": "Independent_003_8", "Independent_004_1": "Independent_004_1", "Independent_004_2": "Independent_004_2", "Independent_004_3": "Independent_004_3", "Independent_004_4": "Independent_004_4", "Independent_004_5": "Independent_004_5", "Independent_004_6": "Independent_004_6", "Independent_004_7": "Independent_004_7", "Independent_005_1": "Independent_005_1", "Independent_005_2": "Independent_005_2", "Independent_005_3": "Independent_005_3", "Independent_005_4": "Independent_005_4", "Independent_005_5": "Independent_005_5", "Independent_005_6": "Independent_005_6", "Independent_006_1": "Independent_006_1", "Independent_006_2": "Independent_006_2", "Independent_006_3": "Independent_006_3", "Independent_006_4": "Independent_006_4", "Independent_006_5": "Independent_006_5", "Independent_006_6": "Independent_006_6", "Independent_007_1": "Independent_007_1", "Independent_007_2": "Independent_007_2", "Independent_007_3": "Independent_007_3", "Independent_008_1": "Independent_008_1", "Independent_008_2": "Independent_008_2", "Independent_008_3": "Independent_008_3", "Independent_009_1": "Independent_009_1", "Independent_010_1": "Independent_010_1", "Independent_010_2": "Independent_010_2", "Independent_010_3": "Independent_010_3", "Independent_010_4": "Independent_010_4", "Independent_011_1": "Independent_011_1", "Independent_011_2": "Independent_011_2", "Independent_011_3": "Independent_011_3", "Independent_011_4": "Independent_011_4", "Independent_011_5": "Independent_011_5", "Independent_012_1": "Independent_012_1", "Independent_012_2": "Independent_012_2", "Independent_012_3": "Independent_012_3", "Independent_012_4": "Independent_012_4", "Independent_012_5": "Independent_012_5", "Independent_012_6": "Independent_012_6", "Independent_012_7": "Independent_012_7", "Independent_013_1": "Independent_013_1", "Independent_013_2": "Independent_013_2", "Independent_013_3": "Independent_013_3", "Independent_013_4": "Independent_013_4", "Independent_014_1": "Independent_014_1", "Independent_015_1": "Independent_015_1", "Independent_016_1": "Independent_016_1", "Independent_016_10": "Independent_016_10", "Independent_016_2": "Independent_016_2", "Independent_016_3": "Independent_016_3", "Independent_016_4": "Independent_016_4", "Independent_016_5": "Independent_016_5", "Independent_016_6": "Independent_016_6", "Independent_016_7": "Independent_016_7", "Independent_016_8": "Independent_016_8", "Independent_016_9": "Independent_016_9", "Independent_017_1": "Independent_017_1", "Independent_017_2": "Independent_017_2", "Independent_017_3": "Independent_017_3", "Independent_017_4": "Independent_017_4", "Independent_017_5": "Independent_017_5", "Independent_018_1": "Independent_018_1", "Independent_018_2": "Independent_018_2", "Independent_018_3": "Independent_018_3", "Independent_018_4": "Independent_018_4", "Independent_018_5": "Independent_018_5", "Independent_019_1": "Independent_019_1", "Independent_019_2": "Independent_019_2", "Independent_019_3": "Independent_019_3", "Independent_019_4": "Independent_019_4", "Independent_019_5": "Independent_019_5", "Independent_019_6": "Independent_019_6", "Independent_019_7": "Independent_019_7", "Independent_020_1": "Independent_020_1", "Independent_020_2": "Independent_020_2", "Independent_020_3": "Independent_020_3", "Independent_020_4": "Independent_020_4", "Independent_021_1": "Independent_021_1", "Independent_021_2": "Independent_021_2", "Independent_021_3": "Independent_021_3", "Independent_021_4": "Independent_021_4", "Independent_022_1": "Independent_022_1", "Independent_022_2": "Independent_022_2", "Independent_022_3": "Independent_022_3", "Independent_023_1": "Independent_023_1", "Independent_023_2": "Independent_023_2", "Independent_023_3": "Independent_023_3", "Independent_023_4": "Independent_023_4", "Independent_023_5": "Independent_023_5", "Independent_023_6": "Independent_023_6", "Independent_024_1": "Independent_024_1", "Independent_024_2": "Independent_024_2", "Independent_024_3": "Independent_024_3", "Independent_024_4": "Independent_024_4", "Independent_025_1": "Independent_025_1", "Independent_025_10": "Independent_025_10", "Independent_025_11": "Independent_025_11", "Independent_025_12": "Independent_025_12", "Independent_025_13": "Independent_025_13", "Independent_025_14": "Independent_025_14", "Independent_025_15": "Independent_025_15", "Independent_025_16": "Independent_025_16", "Independent_025_17": "Independent_025_17", "Independent_025_18": "Independent_025_18", "Independent_025_19": "Independent_025_19", "Independent_025_2": "Independent_025_2", "Independent_025_20": "Independent_025_20", "Independent_025_21": "Independent_025_21", "Independent_025_22": "Independent_025_22", "Independent_025_23": "Independent_025_23", "Independent_025_24": "Independent_025_24", "Independent_025_25": "Independent_025_25", "Independent_025_3": "Independent_025_3", "Independent_025_4": "Independent_025_4", "Independent_025_5": "Independent_025_5", "Independent_025_6": "Independent_025_6", "Independent_025_7": "Independent_025_7", "Independent_025_8": "Independent_025_8", "Independent_025_9": "Independent_025_9", "Independent_026_1": "Independent_026_1", "Independent_026_2": "Independent_026_2", "Independent_026_3": "Independent_026_3", "Independent_026_4": "Independent_026_4", "Independent_026_5": "Independent_026_5", "Independent_026_6": "Independent_026_6", "Independent_027_1": "Independent_027_1", "Independent_028_1": "Independent_028_1", "Independent_028_2": "Independent_028_2", "Independent_028_3": "Independent_028_3", "Independent_028_4": "Independent_028_4", "Independent_028_5": "Independent_028_5", "Independent_029_1": "Independent_029_1", "Independent_029_2": "Independent_029_2", "Independent_030_1": "Independent_030_1", "Independent_030_2": "Independent_030_2", "Independent_030_3": "Independent_030_3", "Independent_031_1": "Independent_031_1", "Independent_031_2": "Independent_031_2", "Independent_032_1": "Independent_032_1", "Independent_032_2": "Independent_032_2", "Independent_033_1": "Independent_033_1", "Independent_033_2": "Independent_033_2", "Independent_033_3": "Independent_033_3", "Independent_034_1": "Independent_034_1", "Independent_035_1": "Independent_035_1", "Independent_035_2": "Independent_035_2", "Independent_035_3": "Independent_035_3", "Independent_036_1": "Independent_036_1", "Independent_036_2": "Independent_036_2", "Independent_036_3": "Independent_036_3", "Independent_036_4": "Independent_036_4", "Independent_037_1": "Independent_037_1", "Independent_037_2": "Independent_037_2", "Independent_037_3": "Independent_037_3", "Independent_037_4": "Independent_037_4", "Independent_037_5": "Independent_037_5", "Independent_037_6": "Independent_037_6", "Independent_037_7": "Independent_037_7", "Independent_037_8": "Independent_037_8", "Independent_038_1": "Independent_038_1", "Independent_038_2": "Independent_038_2", "Independent_038_3": "Independent_038_3", "Independent_038_4": "Independent_038_4", "Independent_039_1": "Independent_039_1", "Independent_039_10": "Independent_039_10", "Independent_039_11": "Independent_039_11", "Independent_039_12": "Independent_039_12", "Independent_039_13": "Independent_039_13", "Independent_039_14": "Independent_039_14", "Independent_039_2": "Independent_039_2", "Independent_039_3": "Independent_039_3", "Independent_039_4": "Independent_039_4", "Independent_039_5": "Independent_039_5", "Independent_039_6": "Independent_039_6", "Independent_039_7": "Independent_039_7", "Independent_039_8": "Independent_039_8", "Independent_039_9": "Independent_039_9", "Independent_040_1": "Independent_040_1", "Independent_040_2": "Independent_040_2", "Independent_040_3": "Independent_040_3", "Independent_040_4": "Independent_040_4", "Independent_040_5": "Independent_040_5", "Independent_041_1": "Independent_041_1", "Independent_041_10": "Independent_041_10", "Independent_041_2": "Independent_041_2", "Independent_041_3": "Independent_041_3", "Independent_041_4": "Independent_041_4", "Independent_041_5": "Independent_041_5", "Independent_041_6": "Independent_041_6", "Independent_041_7": "Independent_041_7", "Independent_041_8": "Independent_041_8", "Independent_041_9": "Independent_041_9", "Independent_042_1": "Independent_042_1", "Independent_042_2": "Independent_042_2", "Independent_042_3": "Independent_042_3", "Independent_043_1": "Independent_043_1", "Independent_043_10": "Independent_043_10", "Independent_043_11": "Independent_043_11", "Independent_043_12": "Independent_043_12", "Independent_043_2": "Independent_043_2", "Independent_043_3": "Independent_043_3", "Independent_043_4": "Independent_043_4", "Independent_043_5": "Independent_043_5", "Independent_043_6": "Independent_043_6", "Independent_043_7": "Independent_043_7", "Independent_043_8": "Independent_043_8", "Independent_043_9": "Independent_043_9", "Independent_044_1": "Independent_044_1", "Independent_044_2": "Independent_044_2", "Independent_045_1": "Independent_045_1", "Independent_045_2": "Independent_045_2", "Independent_045_3": "Independent_045_3", "Independent_045_4": "Independent_045_4", "Independent_046_1": "Independent_046_1", "Independent_046_2": "Independent_046_2", "Independent_046_3": "Independent_046_3", "Independent_046_4": "Independent_046_4", "Independent_046_5": "Independent_046_5", "Independent_046_6": "Independent_046_6", "Independent_047_1": "Independent_047_1", "Independent_047_2": "Independent_047_2", "Independent_047_3": "Independent_047_3", "Independent_048_1": "Independent_048_1", "Independent_048_2": "Independent_048_2", "Independent_048_3": "Independent_048_3", "Independent_048_4": "Independent_048_4", "Independent_049_1": "Independent_049_1", "Independent_049_2": "Independent_049_2", "Independent_049_3": "Independent_049_3", "Independent_049_4": "Independent_049_4", "Independent_049_5": "Independent_049_5", "Independent_049_6": "Independent_049_6", "Independent_050_1": "Independent_050_1", "Independent_050_2": "Independent_050_2", "Independent_050_3": "Independent_050_3", "Independent_050_4": "Independent_050_4", "Independent_051_1": "Independent_051_1", "Independent_051_2": "Independent_051_2", "Independent_051_3": "Independent_051_3", "Independent_051_4": "Independent_051_4", "Independent_051_5": "Independent_051_5", "Independent_052_1": "Independent_052_1", "Independent_052_2": "Independent_052_2", "Independent_052_3": "Independent_052_3", "Independent_052_4": "Independent_052_4", "Independent_052_5": "Independent_052_5", "Independent_053_1": "Independent_053_1", "Independent_053_2": "Independent_053_2", "Independent_054_1": "Independent_054_1", "Independent_054_2": "Independent_054_2", "Independent_055_1": "Independent_055_1", "Independent_055_2": "Independent_055_2", "Independent_055_3": "Independent_055_3", "Independent_056_1": "Independent_056_1", "Independent_056_2": "Independent_056_2", "Independent_056_3": "Independent_056_3", "Independent_057_1": "Independent_057_1", "Independent_057_2": "Independent_057_2", "Independent_057_3": "Independent_057_3", "Independent_058_1": "Independent_058_1", "Independent_058_2": "Independent_058_2", "Independent_058_3": "Independent_058_3", "Independent_058_4": "Independent_058_4", "Independent_058_5": "Independent_058_5", "Independent_058_6": "Independent_058_6", "Independent_058_7": "Independent_058_7", "Independent_058_8": "Independent_058_8", "Independent_059_1": "Independent_059_1", "Independent_059_2": "Independent_059_2", "Independent_059_3": "Independent_059_3", "Independent_059_4": "Independent_059_4", "Independent_059_5": "Independent_059_5", "Independent_059_6": "Independent_059_6", "Independent_059_7": "Independent_059_7", "Independent_059_8": "Independent_059_8", "Independent_060_1": "Independent_060_1", "Independent_060_2": "Independent_060_2", "Independent_060_3": "Independent_060_3", "Independent_060_4": "Independent_060_4", "Independent_061_1": "Independent_061_1", "Independent_061_2": "Independent_061_2", "Independent_061_3": "Independent_061_3", "Independent_061_4": "Independent_061_4", "Independent_061_5": "Independent_061_5", "Independent_061_6": "Independent_061_6", "Independent_061_7": "Independent_061_7", "Independent_062_1": "Independent_062_1", "Independent_062_10": "Independent_062_10", "Independent_062_11": "Independent_062_11", "Independent_062_2": "Independent_062_2", "Independent_062_3": "Independent_062_3", "Independent_062_4": "Independent_062_4", "Independent_062_5": "Independent_062_5", "Independent_062_6": "Independent_062_6", "Independent_062_7": "Independent_062_7", "Independent_062_8": "Independent_062_8", "Independent_062_9": "Independent_062_9", "Independent_063_1": "Independent_063_1", "Independent_063_2": "Independent_063_2", "Independent_063_3": "Independent_063_3", "Independent_063_4": "Independent_063_4", "Independent_063_5": "Independent_063_5", "Independent_063_6": "Independent_063_6", "Independent_064_1": "Independent_064_1", "Independent_064_2": "Independent_064_2", "Independent_064_3": "Independent_064_3", "Independent_064_4": "Independent_064_4", "Independent_064_5": "Independent_064_5", "Independent_065_1": "Independent_065_1", "Independent_065_2": "Independent_065_2", "Independent_065_3": "Independent_065_3", "Independent_065_4": "Independent_065_4", "Independent_066_1": "Independent_066_1", "Independent_066_2": "Independent_066_2", "Independent_066_3": "Independent_066_3", "Independent_066_4": "Independent_066_4", "Independent_066_5": "Independent_066_5", "Independent_067_1": "Independent_067_1", "Independent_067_2": "Independent_067_2", "Independent_067_3": "Independent_067_3", "Independent_067_4": "Independent_067_4", "Independent_067_5": "Independent_067_5", "Independent_067_6": "Independent_067_6", "Independent_068_1": "Independent_068_1", "Independent_068_2": "Independent_068_2", "Independent_068_3": "Independent_068_3", "Independent_068_4": "Independent_068_4", "Independent_068_5": "Independent_068_5", "Independent_068_6": "Independent_068_6", "Independent_069_1": "Independent_069_1", "Independent_069_2": "Independent_069_2", "Independent_069_3": "Independent_069_3", "Independent_069_4": "Independent_069_4", "Independent_069_5": "Independent_069_5", "Independent_069_6": "Independent_069_6", "Independent_069_7": "Independent_069_7", "Independent_069_8": "Independent_069_8", "Independent_069_9": "Independent_069_9", "Independent_070_1": "Independent_070_1", "Independent_070_2": "Independent_070_2", "Independent_070_3": "Independent_070_3", "Independent_070_4": "Independent_070_4", "Independent_071_1": "Independent_071_1", "Independent_071_2": "Independent_071_2", "Independent_071_3": "Independent_071_3", "Independent_071_4": "Independent_071_4", "Independent_071_5": "Independent_071_5", "Independent_071_6": "Independent_071_6", "Independent_071_7": "Independent_071_7", "Independent_071_8": "Independent_071_8", "Independent_071_9": "Independent_071_9", "Independent_072_1": "Independent_072_1", "Independent_072_2": "Independent_072_2", "Independent_072_3": "Independent_072_3", "Independent_072_4": "Independent_072_4", "Independent_072_5": "Independent_072_5", "Independent_072_6": "Independent_072_6", "Independent_072_7": "Independent_072_7", "Independent_072_8": "Independent_072_8", "Independent_073_1": "Independent_073_1", "Independent_073_2": "Independent_073_2", "Independent_073_3": "Independent_073_3", "Independent_073_4": "Independent_073_4", "Independent_074_1": "Independent_074_1", "Independent_074_2": "Independent_074_2", "Independent_074_3": "Independent_074_3", "Independent_074_4": "Independent_074_4", "Independent_074_5": "Independent_074_5", "Independent_075_1": "Independent_075_1", "Independent_075_2": "Independent_075_2", "Independent_075_3": "Independent_075_3", "Independent_075_4": "Independent_075_4", "Independent_075_5": "Independent_075_5", "Independent_075_6": "Independent_075_6", "Independent_076_1": "Independent_076_1", "Independent_076_2": "Independent_076_2", "Independent_076_3": "Independent_076_3", "Independent_076_4": "Independent_076_4", "Independent_077_1": "Independent_077_1", "Independent_077_10": "Independent_077_10", "Independent_077_11": "Independent_077_11", "Independent_077_12": "Independent_077_12", "Independent_077_13": "Independent_077_13", "Independent_077_14": "Independent_077_14", "Independent_077_15": "Independent_077_15", "Independent_077_16": "Independent_077_16", "Independent_077_17": "Independent_077_17", "Independent_077_18": "Independent_077_18", "Independent_077_2": "Independent_077_2", "Independent_077_3": "Independent_077_3", "Independent_077_4": "Independent_077_4", "Independent_077_5": "Independent_077_5", "Independent_077_6": "Independent_077_6", "Independent_077_7": "Independent_077_7", "Independent_077_8": "Independent_077_8", "Independent_077_9": "Independent_077_9", "Independent_078_1": "Independent_078_1", "Independent_078_10": "Independent_078_10", "Independent_078_11": "Independent_078_11", "Independent_078_12": "Independent_078_12", "Independent_078_13": "Independent_078_13", "Independent_078_14": "Independent_078_14", "Independent_078_15": "Independent_078_15", "Independent_078_16": "Independent_078_16", "Independent_078_17": "Independent_078_17", "Independent_078_2": "Independent_078_2", "Independent_078_3": "Independent_078_3", "Independent_078_4": "Independent_078_4", "Independent_078_5": "Independent_078_5", "Independent_078_6": "Independent_078_6", "Independent_078_7": "Independent_078_7", "Independent_078_8": "Independent_078_8", "Independent_078_9": "Independent_078_9", "Independent_079_1": "Independent_079_1", "Independent_079_2": "Independent_079_2", "Independent_079_3": "Independent_079_3", "Independent_079_4": "Independent_079_4", "Independent_080_1": "Independent_080_1", "Independent_080_2": "Independent_080_2", "Independent_080_3": "Independent_080_3", "Independent_080_4": "Independent_080_4", "Independent_080_5": "Independent_080_5", "Independent_080_6": "Independent_080_6", "Independent_080_7": "Independent_080_7", "Independent_080_8": "Independent_080_8", "Independent_081_1": "Independent_081_1", "Independent_081_10": "Independent_081_10", "Independent_081_11": "Independent_081_11", "Independent_081_12": "Independent_081_12", "Independent_081_13": "Independent_081_13", "Independent_081_2": "Independent_081_2", "Independent_081_3": "Independent_081_3", "Independent_081_4": "Independent_081_4", "Independent_081_5": "Independent_081_5", "Independent_081_6": "Independent_081_6", "Independent_081_7": "Independent_081_7", "Independent_081_8": "Independent_081_8", "Independent_081_9": "Independent_081_9", "Independent_082_1": "Independent_082_1", "Independent_082_2": "Independent_082_2", "Independent_082_3": "Independent_082_3", "Independent_082_4": "Independent_082_4", "Independent_082_5": "Independent_082_5", "Independent_082_6": "Independent_082_6", "Independent_082_7": "Independent_082_7", "Independent_083_1": "Independent_083_1", "Independent_083_2": "Independent_083_2", "Independent_083_3": "Independent_083_3", "Independent_083_4": "Independent_083_4", "Independent_083_5": "Independent_083_5", "Independent_084_1": "Independent_084_1", "Independent_084_2": "Independent_084_2", "Independent_084_3": "Independent_084_3", "Independent_084_4": "Independent_084_4", "Independent_084_5": "Independent_084_5", "Independent_084_6": "Independent_084_6", "Independent_084_7": "Independent_084_7", "Independent_084_8": "Independent_084_8", "Independent_085_1": "Independent_085_1", "Independent_085_2": "Independent_085_2", "Independent_085_3": "Independent_085_3", "Independent_086_1": "Independent_086_1", "Independent_086_2": "Independent_086_2", "Independent_086_3": "Independent_086_3", "Independent_086_4": "Independent_086_4", "Independent_086_5": "Independent_086_5", "Independent_087_1": "Independent_087_1", "Independent_087_2": "Independent_087_2", "Independent_087_3": "Independent_087_3", "Independent_088_1": "Independent_088_1", "Independent_088_2": "Independent_088_2", "Independent_088_3": "Independent_088_3", "Independent_088_4": "Independent_088_4", "Independent_088_5": "Independent_088_5", "Independent_088_6": "Independent_088_6", "Independent_089_1": "Independent_089_1", "Independent_089_2": "Independent_089_2", "Independent_089_3": "Independent_089_3", "Independent_090_1": "Independent_090_1", "Independent_090_10": "Independent_090_10", "Independent_090_11": "Independent_090_11", "Independent_090_2": "Independent_090_2", "Independent_090_3": "Independent_090_3", "Independent_090_4": "Independent_090_4", "Independent_090_5": "Independent_090_5", "Independent_090_6": "Independent_090_6", "Independent_090_7": "Independent_090_7", "Independent_090_8": "Independent_090_8", "Independent_090_9": "Independent_090_9", "Independent_091_1": "Independent_091_1", "Independent_091_2": "Independent_091_2", "Independent_091_3": "Independent_091_3", "Independent_092_1": "Independent_092_1", "Independent_093_1": "Independent_093_1", "Independent_093_2": "Independent_093_2", "Independent_094_1": "Independent_094_1", "Independent_094_2": "Independent_094_2", "Independent_094_3": "Independent_094_3", "Independent_094_4": "Independent_094_4", "Independent_094_5": "Independent_094_5", "Independent_094_6": "Independent_094_6", "Independent_094_7": "Independent_094_7", "Independent_095_1": "Independent_095_1", "Independent_095_2": "Independent_095_2", "Independent_095_3": "Independent_095_3", "Independent_096_1": "Independent_096_1", "Independent_096_2": "Independent_096_2", "Independent_096_3": "Independent_096_3", "Independent_097_1": "Independent_097_1", "Independent_097_2": "Independent_097_2", "Independent_097_3": "Independent_097_3", "Independent_097_4": "Independent_097_4", "Independent_097_5": "Independent_097_5", "Independent_097_6": "Independent_097_6", "Independent_097_7": "Independent_097_7", "Independent_098_1": "Independent_098_1", "Independent_098_2": "Independent_098_2", "Independent_098_3": "Independent_098_3", "Independent_099_1": "Independent_099_1", "Independent_099_2": "Independent_099_2", "Independent_099_3": "Independent_099_3", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_100_2": "Independent_100_2", "Independent_100_3": "Independent_100_3", "Independent_100_4": "Independent_100_4", "Independent_100_5": "Independent_100_5", "Independent_100_6": "Independent_100_6", "Independent_100_7": "Independent_100_7", "Independent_101_1": "Independent_101_1", "Independent_101_2": "Independent_101_2", "Independent_101_3": "Independent_101_3", "Independent_101_4": "Independent_101_4", "Independent_102_1": "Independent_102_1", "Independent_102_2": "Independent_102_2", "Independent_102_3": "Independent_102_3", "Independent_102_4": "Independent_102_4", "Independent_102_5": "Independent_102_5", "Independent_102_6": "Independent_102_6", "Independent_102_7": "Independent_102_7", "Independent_102_8": "Independent_102_8", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_103_2": "Independent_103_2", "Independent_103_3": "Independent_103_3", "Independent_103_4": "Independent_103_4", "Independent_104_1": "Independent_104_1", "Independent_105_1": "Independent_105_1", "Independent_105_2": "Independent_105_2", "Independent_105_3": "Independent_105_3", "Independent_105_4": "Independent_105_4", "Independent_106_1": "Independent_106_1", "Independent_106_2": "Independent_106_2", "Independent_107_1": "Independent_107_1", "Independent_107_10": "Independent_107_10", "Independent_107_11": "Independent_107_11", "Independent_107_12": "Independent_107_12", "Independent_107_13": "Independent_107_13", "Independent_107_14": "Independent_107_14", "Independent_107_15": "Independent_107_15", "Independent_107_16": "Independent_107_16", "Independent_107_17": "Independent_107_17", "Independent_107_2": "Independent_107_2", "Independent_107_3": "Independent_107_3", "Independent_107_4": "Independent_107_4", "Independent_107_5": "Independent_107_5", "Independent_107_6": "Independent_107_6", "Independent_107_7": "Independent_107_7", "Independent_107_8": "Independent_107_8", "Independent_107_9": "Independent_107_9", "Independent_108_1": "Independent_108_1", "Independent_109_1": "Independent_109_1", "Independent_109_2": "Independent_109_2", "Independent_110_1": "Independent_110_1", "Independent_110_2": "Independent_110_2", "Independent_110_3": "Independent_110_3", "Independent_110_4": "Independent_110_4", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "Independent_111_2": "Independent_111_2", "Independent_111_3": "Independent_111_3", "Independent_111_4": "Independent_111_4", "Independent_112_1": "Independent_112_1", "Independent_113_1": "Independent_113_1", "Independent_113_2": "Independent_113_2", "Independent_113_3": "Independent_113_3", "Independent_113_4": "Independent_113_4", "Independent_114_1": "Independent_114_1", "Independent_114_2": "Independent_114_2", "Independent_114_3": "Independent_114_3", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_115_2": "Independent_115_2", "Independent_115_3": "Independent_115_3", "Independent_115_4": "Independent_115_4", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "Independent_116_2": "Independent_116_2", "Independent_116_3": "Independent_116_3", "Independent_116_4": "Independent_116_4", "Independent_116_5": "Independent_116_5", "Independent_116_6": "Independent_116_6", "Independent_117_1": "Independent_117_1", "Independent_118_1": "Independent_118_1", "Independent_118_2": "Independent_118_2", "Independent_119_1": "Independent_119_1", "Independent_120_1": "Independent_120_1", "Independent_120_2": "Independent_120_2", "Independent_121_1": "Independent_121_1", "Independent_122_1": "Independent_122_1", "Independent_122_2": "Independent_122_2", "Independent_122_3": "Independent_122_3", "Independent_122_4": "Independent_122_4", "Independent_122_5": "Independent_122_5", "Independent_125_1": "Independent_125_1", "Independent_126_1": "Independent_126_1", "Independent_126_2": "Independent_126_2", "Independent_126_3": "Independent_126_3", "Independent_126_4": "Independent_126_4", "Independent_126_5": "Independent_126_5", "Independent_126_6": "Independent_126_6", "Independent_127_1": "Independent_127_1", "Independent_128_1": "Independent_128_1", "Independent_128_2": "Independent_128_2", "Independent_131_1": "Independent_131_1", "Independent_131_2": "Independent_131_2", "Independent_132_1": "Independent_132_1", "Independent_132_2": "Independent_132_2", "Independent_134_1": "Independent_134_1", "Independent_135_1": "Independent_135_1", "Independent_136_1": "Independent_136_1", "Independent_136_2": "Independent_136_2", "Independent_136_3": "Independent_136_3", "Independent_136_4": "Independent_136_4", "Independent_137_1": "Independent_137_1", "Independent_138_1": "Independent_138_1", "Independent_138_2": "Independent_138_2", "Independent_138_3": "Independent_138_3", "Independent_139_1": "Independent_139_1", "Independent_139_2": "Independent_139_2", "Independent_139_3": "Independent_139_3", "Independent_140_1": "Independent_140_1", "Independent_140_2": "Independent_140_2", "Independent_140_3": "Independent_140_3", "Independent_140_4": "Independent_140_4", "Independent_140_5": "Independent_140_5", "Independent_141_1": "Independent_141_1", "Independent_141_2": "Independent_141_2", "Independent_142_1": "Independent_142_1", "Independent_143_1": "Independent_143_1", "Independent_143_2": "Independent_143_2", "Independent_144_1": "Independent_144_1", "Independent_144_2": "Independent_144_2", "Independent_144_3": "Independent_144_3", "Independent_145_1": "Independent_145_1", "Independent_145_2": "Independent_145_2", "Independent_145_3": "Independent_145_3", "Independent_145_4": "Independent_145_4", "Independent_146_1": "Independent_146_1", "Independent_146_2": "Independent_146_2", "Independent_146_3": "Independent_146_3", "Independent_147_1": "Independent_147_1", "Independent_147_2": "Independent_147_2", "Independent_147_3": "Independent_147_3", "Independent_147_4": "Independent_147_4", "Independent_147_5": "Independent_147_5", "Independent_148_1": "Independent_148_1", "Independent_148_2": "Independent_148_2", "Independent_148_3": "Independent_148_3", "Independent_149_1": "Independent_149_1", "Independent_149_2": "Independent_149_2", "Independent_149_3": "Independent_149_3", "Independent_150_1": "Independent_150_1", "Independent_150_2": "Independent_150_2", "Independent_150_3": "Independent_150_3", "Independent_150_4": "Independent_150_4", "Independent_151_1": "Independent_151_1", "Independent_151_2": "Independent_151_2", "Independent_151_3": "Independent_151_3", "Independent_151_4": "Independent_151_4", "Independent_151_5": "Independent_151_5", "Independent_153_1": "Independent_153_1", "Independent_153_2": "Independent_153_2", "Independent_154_1": "Independent_154_1", "Independent_154_2": "Independent_154_2", "Independent_154_3": "Independent_154_3", "Independent_154_4": "Independent_154_4", "Independent_155_1": "Independent_155_1", "Independent_155_2": "Independent_155_2", "Independent_156_1": "Independent_156_1", "Independent_156_2": "Independent_156_2", "Independent_157_1": "Independent_157_1", "Independent_157_2": "Independent_157_2", "Independent_158_1": "Independent_158_1", "Independent_158_2": "Independent_158_2", "Independent_158_3": "Independent_158_3", "Independent_158_4": "Independent_158_4", "Independent_158_5": "Independent_158_5", "Independent_159_1": "Independent_159_1", "Independent_159_2": "Independent_159_2", "Independent_159_3": "Independent_159_3", "Independent_159_4": "Independent_159_4", "Independent_159_5": "Independent_159_5", "Independent_159_6": "Independent_159_6", "Independent_159_7": "Independent_159_7", "Independent_159_8": "Independent_159_8", "Independent_160_1": "Independent_160_1", "Independent_160_2": "Independent_160_2", "Independent_160_3": "Independent_160_3", "Independent_160_4": "Independent_160_4", "Independent_160_5": "Independent_160_5", "Independent_160_6": "Independent_160_6", "Independent_160_7": "Independent_160_7", "Independent_161_1": "Independent_161_1", "Independent_162_1": "Independent_162_1", "Independent_162_2": "Independent_162_2", "Independent_162_3": "Independent_162_3", "Independent_162_4": "Independent_162_4", "Independent_162_5": "Independent_162_5", "Independent_163_1": "Independent_163_1", "Independent_163_2": "Independent_163_2", "Independent_163_3": "Independent_163_3", "Independent_163_4": "Independent_163_4", "Independent_163_5": "Independent_163_5", "Independent_164_1": "Independent_164_1", "Independent_164_2": "Independent_164_2", "Independent_164_3": "Independent_164_3", "Independent_164_4": "Independent_164_4", "Independent_164_5": "Independent_164_5", "Independent_165_1": "Independent_165_1", "Independent_165_2": "Independent_165_2", "Independent_166_1": "Independent_166_1", "Independent_166_2": "Independent_166_2", "Independent_166_3": "Independent_166_3", "Independent_166_4": "Independent_166_4", "Independent_167_1": "Independent_167_1", "Independent_167_2": "Independent_167_2", "Independent_167_3": "Independent_167_3", "Independent_167_4": "Independent_167_4", "Independent_167_5": "Independent_167_5", "Independent_167_6": "Independent_167_6", "Independent_167_7": "Independent_167_7", "Independent_168_1": "Independent_168_1", "Independent_168_2": "Independent_168_2", "Independent_168_3": "Independent_168_3", "Independent_169_1": "Independent_169_1", "Independent_169_2": "Independent_169_2", "Independent_171_1": "Independent_171_1", "Independent_171_2": "Independent_171_2", "Independent_171_3": "Independent_171_3", "Independent_172_1": "Independent_172_1", "Independent_172_2": "Independent_172_2", "Independent_173_1": "Independent_173_1", "Independent_174_1": "Independent_174_1", "Independent_174_2": "Independent_174_2", "Independent_174_3": "Independent_174_3", "Independent_174_4": "Independent_174_4", "Independent_175_1": "Independent_175_1", "Independent_175_2": "Independent_175_2", "Independent_175_3": "Independent_175_3", "Independent_175_4": "Independent_175_4", "Independent_175_5": "Independent_175_5", "Independent_175_6": "Independent_175_6", "Independent_176_1": "Independent_176_1", "Independent_179_1": "Independent_179_1", "Independent_179_2": "Independent_179_2", "Independent_180_1": "Independent_180_1", "Independent_180_2": "Independent_180_2", "Independent_180_3": "Independent_180_3", "Independent_180_4": "Independent_180_4", "Independent_180_5": "Independent_180_5", "Independent_182_1": "Independent_182_1", "Independent_182_2": "Independent_182_2", "JANSAPP": "JANSAPP", "JASP": "JASP", "JD(S)": "JD(S)", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "LOGAP": "LOGAP", "LOKSP": "LOKSP", "LSPS": "LSPS", "LSWP": "LSWP", "LVM": "LVM", "MANPA": "MANPA", "NBNM": "NBNM", "NCP": "NCP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "PAP": "PAP", "PPS": "PPS", "RAJPA": "RAJPA", "REALDP": "REALDP", "RKEP": "RKEP", "RKSP": "RKSP", "RMGP": "RMGP", "RMNMP": "RMNMP", "RPI": "RPI", "RPIR": "RPIR", "RSP(S)": "RSP(S)", "RSPS": "RSPS", "RVZP": "RVZP", "SAJPCS": "SAJPCS", "SHS": "SHS", "SP": "SP", "SP(I)": "SP(I)", "STBSP": "STBSP", "SUCI": "SUCI", "SVPP": "SVPP", "VHS": "VHS", "VPP": "VPP", "YJJP": "YJJP", "YPD": "YPD", "YUS": "YUS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 182, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 182, "cast_gt_registered": 182}, "n_stations_flagged": 182, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:39:33.657229", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.604, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.56, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.488, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.069, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.124, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.488, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.287, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.287, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.619, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.568, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.568, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 182}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f374b52735864095b0e613263185ff50", "name": "India 2016 local (overnight india_kerala_2016_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2016, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Kerala/Kerala_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Turnout_Percentage": "Turnout_Percentage", "IUML": "IUML", "BJP": "BJP", "CPM": "CPM", "PDP": "PDP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "BSP": "BSP", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "Independent_1_3": "Independent_1_3", "INL": "INL", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "Independent_2_3": "Independent_2_3", "INC": "INC", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "SDPI": "SDPI", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "APOI": "APOI", "Independent_3_3": "Independent_3_3", "Independent_3_4": "Independent_3_4", "CPI": "CPI", "BDJS": "BDJS", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "SHS": "SHS", "Independent_4_4": "Independent_4_4", "Independent_4_5": "Independent_4_5", "WPOI": "WPOI", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "Independent_5_2": "Independent_5_2", "Independent_5_3": "Independent_5_3", "Independent_5_4": "Independent_5_4", "CPIM": "CPIM", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "KEC(M)": "KEC(M)", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "Independent_8_3": "Independent_8_3", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "Independent_9_2": "Independent_9_2", "Independent_9_3": "Independent_9_3", "Independent_9_4": "Independent_9_4", "Independent_9_5": "Independent_9_5", "Independent_9_6": "Independent_9_6", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "SUCI": "SUCI", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "Independent_10_3": "Independent_10_3", "Independent_10_4": "Independent_10_4", "C(S)": "C(S)", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "Independent_11_3": "Independent_11_3", "Independent_11_4": "Independent_11_4", "Independent_11_5": "Independent_11_5", "Independent_11_6": "Independent_11_6", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "Independent_13_3": "Independent_13_3", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "Independent_14_3": "Independent_14_3", "Independent_14_4": "Independent_14_4", "Independent_14_5": "Independent_14_5", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_16_2": "Independent_16_2", "Independent_16_3": "Independent_16_3", "Independent_16_4": "Independent_16_4", "Independent_16_5": "Independent_16_5", "Independent_16_6": "Independent_16_6", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "Independent_17_3": "Independent_17_3", "Independent_17_4": "Independent_17_4", "Independent_17_5": "Independent_17_5", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "SP": "SP", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "Independent_19_3": "Independent_19_3", "Independent_19_4": "Independent_19_4", "JD(S)": "JD(S)", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_20_2": "Independent_20_2", "Independent_20_3": "Independent_20_3", "Independent_20_4": "Independent_20_4", "Independent_20_5": "Independent_20_5", "Independent_20_6": "Independent_20_6", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_21_2": "Independent_21_2", "Independent_21_3": "Independent_21_3", "Independent_21_4": "Independent_21_4", "Independent_21_5": "Independent_21_5", "Independent_21_6": "Independent_21_6", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_22_2": "Independent_22_2", "Independent_22_3": "Independent_22_3", "Independent_22_4": "Independent_22_4", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_23_2": "Independent_23_2", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "Independent_24_2": "Independent_24_2", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "Independent_25_4": "Independent_25_4", "NCP": "NCP", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "KLJP": "KLJP", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "Independent_28_4": "Independent_28_4", "Independent_28_5": "Independent_28_5", "Independent_28_6": "Independent_28_6", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "Independent_29_4": "Independent_29_4", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "Independent_30_3": "Independent_30_3", "Independent_30_4": "Independent_30_4", "Independent_30_5": "Independent_30_5", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_31_2": "Independent_31_2", "Independent_31_3": "Independent_31_3", "Independent_31_4": "Independent_31_4", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_32_3": "Independent_32_3", "Independent_32_4": "Independent_32_4", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "Independent_33_4": "Independent_33_4", "Independent_33_5": "Independent_33_5", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_34_3": "Independent_34_3", "Independent_34_4": "Independent_34_4", "Independent_34_5": "Independent_34_5", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_39_2": "Independent_39_2", "Independent_39_3": "Independent_39_3", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_42_2": "Independent_42_2", "Independent_42_3": "Independent_42_3", "Independent_42_4": "Independent_42_4", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_43_2": "Independent_43_2", "Independent_43_3": "Independent_43_3", "Independent_43_4": "Independent_43_4", "NSC": "NSC", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "Independent_44_3": "Independent_44_3", "Independent_44_4": "Independent_44_4", "Independent_44_5": "Independent_44_5", "Independent_44_6": "Independent_44_6", "Independent_44_7": "Independent_44_7", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_45_2": "Independent_45_2", "Independent_45_3": "Independent_45_3", "Independent_45_4": "Independent_45_4", "Independent_45_5": "Independent_45_5", "Independent_45_6": "Independent_45_6", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "Independent_46_3": "Independent_46_3", "Independent_46_4": "Independent_46_4", "Independent_46_5": "Independent_46_5", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "Independent_47_3": "Independent_47_3", "Independent_47_4": "Independent_47_4", "Independent_47_5": "Independent_47_5", "Independent_47_6": "Independent_47_6", "Independent_47_7": "Independent_47_7", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_48_2": "Independent_48_2", "Independent_48_3": "Independent_48_3", "Independent_48_4": "Independent_48_4", "Independent_48_5": "Independent_48_5", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_50_3": "Independent_50_3", "Independent_50_4": "Independent_50_4", "Independent_50_5": "Independent_50_5", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_51_3": "Independent_51_3", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "ADMK": "ADMK", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_55_2": "Independent_55_2", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_58_1": "Independent_58_1", "Independent_58_2": "Independent_58_2", "Independent_58_3": "Independent_58_3", "Independent_58_4": "Independent_58_4", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_59_2": "Independent_59_2", "Independent_59_3": "Independent_59_3", "Independent_59_4": "Independent_59_4", "Independent_59_5": "Independent_59_5", "Independent_59_6": "Independent_59_6", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "CMPKSC": "CMPKSC", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_64_2": "Independent_64_2", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_66_2": "Independent_66_2", "Independent_66_3": "Independent_66_3", "Independent_67_1": "Independent_67_1", "Independent_67_2": "Independent_67_2", "IGP": "IGP", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "Independent_68_3": "Independent_68_3", "RSP": "RSP", "SDP": "SDP", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "Independent_71_1": "Independent_71_1", "Independent_71_2": "Independent_71_2", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_72_2": "Independent_72_2", "Independent_72_3": "Independent_72_3", "Independent_72_4": "Independent_72_4", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "Independent_73_3": "Independent_73_3", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_74_2": "Independent_74_2", "Independent_74_3": "Independent_74_3", "KEC": "KEC", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_75_2": "Independent_75_2", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_76_3": "Independent_76_3", "Independent_76_4": "Independent_76_4", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_77_2": "Independent_77_2", "Independent_77_3": "Independent_77_3", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_78_2": "Independent_78_2", "MCPI": "MCPI", "Independent_79_1": "Independent_79_1", "Independent_79_2": "Independent_79_2", "Independent_79_3": "Independent_79_3", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_80_2": "Independent_80_2", "Independent_80_3": "Independent_80_3", "Independent_80_4": "Independent_80_4", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "Independent_81_2": "Independent_81_2", "Independent_81_3": "Independent_81_3", "Independent_81_4": "Independent_81_4", "Independent_81_5": "Independent_81_5", "Independent_81_6": "Independent_81_6", "Independent_82_1": "Independent_82_1", "Independent_82_2": "Independent_82_2", "Independent_82_3": "Independent_82_3", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_83_2": "Independent_83_2", "Independent_83_3": "Independent_83_3", "Independent_83_4": "Independent_83_4", "Independent_83_5": "Independent_83_5", "Independent_83_6": "Independent_83_6", "Independent_84_1": "Independent_84_1", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "KEC(J)": "KEC(J)", "PPGP": "PPGP", "Independent_85_1": "Independent_85_1", "Independent_85_2": "Independent_85_2", "Independent_86_1": "Independent_86_1", "Independent_87_1": "Independent_87_1", "Independent_87_2": "Independent_87_2", "Independent_87_3": "Independent_87_3", "Independent_87_4": "Independent_87_4", "Independent_88_1": "Independent_88_1", "Independent_88_2": "Independent_88_2", "Independent_88_3": "Independent_88_3", "Independent_88_4": "Independent_88_4", "Independent_88_5": "Independent_88_5", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_90_1": "Independent_90_1", "Independent_90_2": "Independent_90_2", "Independent_90_3": "Independent_90_3", "Independent_90_4": "Independent_90_4", "Independent_91_1": "Independent_91_1", "Independent_91_2": "Independent_91_2", "Independent_91_3": "Independent_91_3", "Independent_92_1": "Independent_92_1", "Independent_92_2": "Independent_92_2", "Independent_93_1": "Independent_93_1", "Independent_93_2": "Independent_93_2", "Independent_93_3": "Independent_93_3", "Independent_93_4": "Independent_93_4", "Independent_93_5": "Independent_93_5", "KCST": "KCST", "Independent_94_1": "Independent_94_1", "Independent_95_1": "Independent_95_1", "Independent_96_1": "Independent_96_1", "Independent_97_1": "Independent_97_1", "Independent_97_2": "Independent_97_2", "Independent_98_1": "Independent_98_1", "Independent_98_2": "Independent_98_2", "Independent_98_3": "Independent_98_3", "Independent_98_4": "Independent_98_4", "Independent_99_1": "Independent_99_1", "Independent_99_2": "Independent_99_2", "Independent_99_3": "Independent_99_3", "KCS": "KCS", "Independent_99_4": "Independent_99_4", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_100_2": "Independent_100_2", "Independent_100_3": "Independent_100_3", "Independent_101_1": "Independent_101_1", "Independent_101_2": "Independent_101_2", "Independent_101_3": "Independent_101_3", "Independent_101_4": "Independent_101_4", "Independent_101_5": "Independent_101_5", "Independent_101_6": "Independent_101_6", "Independent_101_7": "Independent_101_7", "Independent_101_8": "Independent_101_8", "Independent_101_9": "Independent_101_9", "Independent_101_10": "Independent_101_10", "Independent_102_1": "Independent_102_1", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_103_2": "Independent_103_2", "Independent_103_3": "Independent_103_3", "Independent_103_4": "Independent_103_4", "Independent_104_1": "Independent_104_1", "Independent_104_2": "Independent_104_2", "Independent_105_1": "Independent_105_1", "Independent_105_2": "Independent_105_2", "Independent_105_3": "Independent_105_3", "Independent_106_1": "Independent_106_1", "Independent_106_2": "Independent_106_2", "Independent_106_3": "Independent_106_3", "Independent_107_1": "Independent_107_1", "Independent_107_2": "Independent_107_2", "Independent_107_3": "Independent_107_3", "Independent_107_4": "Independent_107_4", "Independent_107_5": "Independent_107_5", "Independent_107_6": "Independent_107_6", "Independent_108_1": "Independent_108_1", "Independent_108_2": "Independent_108_2", "Independent_108_3": "Independent_108_3", "Independent_108_4": "Independent_108_4", "Independent_109_1": "Independent_109_1", "Independent_110_1": "Independent_110_1", "Independent_110_2": "Independent_110_2", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "Independent_112_1": "Independent_112_1", "Independent_112_2": "Independent_112_2", "Independent_113_1": "Independent_113_1", "Independent_113_2": "Independent_113_2", "Independent_114_1": "Independent_114_1", "Independent_114_2": "Independent_114_2", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "Independent_117_1": "Independent_117_1", "Independent_117_2": "Independent_117_2", "Independent_117_3": "Independent_117_3", "Independent_117_4": "Independent_117_4", "Independent_117_5": "Independent_117_5", "Independent_118_1": "Independent_118_1", "Independent_118_2": "Independent_118_2", "Independent_118_3": "Independent_118_3", "Independent_119_1": "Independent_119_1", "Independent_119_2": "Independent_119_2", "Independent_119_3": "Independent_119_3", "KEC(B)": "KEC(B)", "Independent_120_1": "Independent_120_1", "Independent_120_2": "Independent_120_2", "Independent_120_3": "Independent_120_3", "Independent_121_1": "Independent_121_1", "Independent_121_2": "Independent_121_2", "Independent_122_1": "Independent_122_1", "Independent_123_1": "Independent_123_1", "Independent_124_1": "Independent_124_1", "Independent_124_2": "Independent_124_2", "Independent_124_3": "Independent_124_3", "Independent_125_1": "Independent_125_1", "Independent_126_1": "Independent_126_1", "Independent_127_1": "Independent_127_1", "Independent_127_2": "Independent_127_2", "Independent_127_3": "Independent_127_3", "Independent_127_4": "Independent_127_4", "Independent_127_5": "Independent_127_5", "Independent_127_6": "Independent_127_6", "Independent_128_1": "Independent_128_1", "Independent_128_2": "Independent_128_2", "Independent_128_3": "Independent_128_3", "Independent_129_1": "Independent_129_1", "Independent_129_2": "Independent_129_2", "Independent_129_3": "Independent_129_3", "Independent_129_4": "Independent_129_4", "Independent_130_1": "Independent_130_1", "Independent_130_2": "Independent_130_2", "Independent_130_3": "Independent_130_3", "Independent_130_4": "Independent_130_4", "Independent_130_5": "Independent_130_5", "Independent_131_1": "Independent_131_1", "Independent_131_2": "Independent_131_2", "Independent_131_3": "Independent_131_3", "Independent_131_4": "Independent_131_4", "Independent_132_1": "Independent_132_1", "Independent_132_2": "Independent_132_2", "Independent_132_3": "Independent_132_3", "Independent_132_4": "Independent_132_4", "Independent_132_5": "Independent_132_5", "Independent_132_6": "Independent_132_6", "Independent_132_7": "Independent_132_7", "Independent_132_8": "Independent_132_8", "Independent_133_1": "Independent_133_1", "Independent_133_2": "Independent_133_2", "Independent_133_3": "Independent_133_3", "Independent_133_4": "Independent_133_4", "Independent_133_5": "Independent_133_5", "Independent_134_1": "Independent_134_1", "Independent_134_2": "Independent_134_2", "Independent_134_3": "Independent_134_3", "Independent_134_4": "Independent_134_4", "Independent_134_5": "Independent_134_5", "Independent_134_6": "Independent_134_6", "Independent_134_7": "Independent_134_7", "AKTP": "AKTP", "Independent_135_1": "Independent_135_1", "Independent_135_2": "Independent_135_2", "Independent_135_3": "Independent_135_3", "Independent_135_4": "Independent_135_4", "Independent_136_1": "Independent_136_1", "Independent_136_2": "Independent_136_2", "Independent_136_3": "Independent_136_3", "Independent_136_4": "Independent_136_4", "Independent_136_5": "Independent_136_5", "Independent_137_1": "Independent_137_1", "Independent_137_2": "Independent_137_2", "Independent_137_3": "Independent_137_3", "Independent_137_4": "Independent_137_4", "Independent_137_5": "Independent_137_5", "Independent_138_1": "Independent_138_1", "Independent_139_1": "Independent_139_1", "Independent_139_2": "Independent_139_2", "Independent_139_3": "Independent_139_3", "Independent_139_4": "Independent_139_4", "Independent_140_1": "Independent_140_1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 140, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 140, "registered_not_positive": 140}, "n_stations_flagged": 140, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:39:28.228125", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.604, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.56, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.524, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.406, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.069, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.314, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.323, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.524, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.406, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.406, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.311, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.311, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.628, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.616, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 140}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e3f4725216084db0a2ae2c102063b23f", "name": "India 2018 local (overnight india-telangana-2018-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2018, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Telangana/Telangana_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"TRS": "TRS", "INC": "INC", "BJP": "BJP", "BSP": "BSP", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "NOTA": "NOTA", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "PPOI": "PPOI", "API": "API", "Independent_1_3": "Independent_1_3", "BMUP": "BMUP", "BJLP": "BJLP", "PRBP": "PRBP", "RPI_KH": "RPI_KH", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "NPRP": "NPRP", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "RPI_A": "RPI_A", "Independent_2_3": "Independent_2_3", "NCP": "NCP", "NIP": "NIP", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "CPI": "CPI", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "Independent_3_3": "Independent_3_3", "Independent_3_4": "Independent_3_4", "Independent_3_5": "Independent_3_5", "AAP": "AAP", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "Independent_4_4": "Independent_4_4", "Independent_4_5": "Independent_4_5", "Independent_4_6": "Independent_4_6", "Independent_4_7": "Independent_4_7", "Independent_4_8": "Independent_4_8", "IPBP": "IPBP", "SHS": "SHS", "TPGS": "TPGS", "Independent_4_9": "Independent_4_9", "TJS": "TJS", "BBKD": "BBKD", "BHRJP": "BHRJP", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "CPM": "CPM", "Independent_6_2": "Independent_6_2", "PJD": "PJD", "TPJP": "TPJP", "Rasyadhikara_Party": "Rasyadhikara_Party", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "Independent_7_2": "Independent_7_2", "Independent_7_3": "Independent_7_3", "GGP": "GGP", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "Independent_10_3": "Independent_10_3", "Independent_10_4": "Independent_10_4", "Independent_10_5": "Independent_10_5", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "ANC": "ANC", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "Independent_12_3": "Independent_12_3", "SP": "SP", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_15_2": "Independent_15_2", "NVSMP": "NVSMP", "SWFB": "SWFB", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_16_2": "Independent_16_2", "AIFB": "AIFB", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "Independent_17_3": "Independent_17_3", "Independent_17_4": "Independent_17_4", "Independent_17_5": "Independent_17_5", "Independent_17_6": "Independent_17_6", "Independent_17_7": "Independent_17_7", "Independent_17_8": "Independent_17_8", "Independent_17_9": "Independent_17_9", "Independent_17_10": "Independent_17_10", "AIJHP": "AIJHP", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_18_3": "Independent_18_3", "Independent_18_4": "Independent_18_4", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "TPS_KRaK": "TPS_KRaK", "Independent_19_3": "Independent_19_3", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_20_2": "Independent_20_2", "BHRHS": "BHRHS", "Independent_20_3": "Independent_20_3", "Independent_20_4": "Independent_20_4", "Independent_20_5": "Independent_20_5", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_21_2": "Independent_21_2", "Independent_21_3": "Independent_21_3", "Independent_21_4": "Independent_21_4", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_22_2": "Independent_22_2", "JISWP": "JISWP", "NYBP": "NYBP", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_23_2": "Independent_23_2", "Independent_23_3": "Independent_23_3", "Independent_23_4": "Independent_23_4", "Independent_23_5": "Independent_23_5", "Independent_23_6": "Independent_23_6", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "Independent_24_2": "Independent_24_2", "TKRRP": "TKRRP", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "Independent_25_4": "Independent_25_4", "Independent_25_5": "Independent_25_5", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "Independent_26_3": "Independent_26_3", "Independent_26_4": "Independent_26_4", "Independent_26_5": "Independent_26_5", "Independent_26_6": "Independent_26_6", "Independent_26_7": "Independent_26_7", "Independent_26_8": "Independent_26_8", "RPI": "RPI", "Independent_26_9": "Independent_26_9", "Independent_26_10": "Independent_26_10", "DABAP": "DABAP", "Independent_26_11": "Independent_26_11", "Independent_26_12": "Independent_26_12", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "Independent_27_3": "Independent_27_3", "MCPI_U": "MCPI_U", "Independent_27_4": "Independent_27_4", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "Independent_28_4": "Independent_28_4", "Independent_28_5": "Independent_28_5", "TLCP": "TLCP", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "ABDBM": "ABDBM", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "JMBP": "JMBP", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "ABJS": "ABJS", "TLIP": "TLIP", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "AISMP": "AISMP", "Independent_32_3": "Independent_32_3", "Independent_32_4": "Independent_32_4", "SHP": "SHP", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "Independent_33_4": "Independent_33_4", "Independent_33_5": "Independent_33_5", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "Independent_35_2": "Independent_35_2", "MANP": "MANP", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_38_3": "Independent_38_3", "Independent_38_4": "Independent_38_4", "Independent_38_5": "Independent_38_5", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_39_2": "Independent_39_2", "Independent_39_3": "Independent_39_3", "Independent_39_4": "Independent_39_4", "TCPI": "TCPI", "AYSRCP": "AYSRCP", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_40_3": "Independent_40_3", "Independent_40_4": "Independent_40_4", "Independent_40_5": "Independent_40_5", "SUCI": "SUCI", "Independent_40_6": "Independent_40_6", "Independent_40_7": "Independent_40_7", "Independent_40_8": "Independent_40_8", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "Independent_41_3": "Independent_41_3", "Independent_41_4": "Independent_41_4", "Independent_41_5": "Independent_41_5", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_42_2": "Independent_42_2", "Independent_42_3": "Independent_42_3", "Independent_42_4": "Independent_42_4", "Independent_42_5": "Independent_42_5", "Independent_42_6": "Independent_42_6", "Independent_42_7": "Independent_42_7", "PRSTP": "PRSTP", "ILP_AP": "ILP_AP", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_43_2": "Independent_43_2", "Independent_43_3": "Independent_43_3", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "PRSWP": "PRSWP", "Independent_44_3": "Independent_44_3", "Independent_44_4": "Independent_44_4", "JVHNP": "JVHNP", "Independent_44_5": "Independent_44_5", "Independent_44_6": "Independent_44_6", "Independent_44_7": "Independent_44_7", "Independent_44_8": "Independent_44_8", "Independent_44_9": "Independent_44_9", "Independent_44_10": "Independent_44_10", "Independent_44_11": "Independent_44_11", "SWBP": "SWBP", "Independent_44_12": "Independent_44_12", "Independent_44_13": "Independent_44_13", "Independent_44_14": "Independent_44_14", "Independent_44_15": "Independent_44_15", "JBJSP": "JBJSP", "Independent_44_16": "Independent_44_16", "Independent_44_17": "Independent_44_17", "Independent_44_18": "Independent_44_18", "Independent_44_19": "Independent_44_19", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_45_2": "Independent_45_2", "Independent_45_3": "Independent_45_3", "Independent_45_4": "Independent_45_4", "Independent_45_5": "Independent_45_5", "Independent_45_6": "Independent_45_6", "Independent_45_7": "Independent_45_7", "Independent_45_8": "Independent_45_8", "Independent_45_9": "Independent_45_9", "TDP": "TDP", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "ANASP": "ANASP", "Independent_46_3": "Independent_46_3", "Independent_46_4": "Independent_46_4", "SPS": "SPS", "Independent_46_5": "Independent_46_5", "Independent_46_6": "Independent_46_6", "Independent_46_7": "Independent_46_7", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "ICSP": "ICSP", "Independent_47_3": "Independent_47_3", "TFIP": "TFIP", "Independent_47_4": "Independent_47_4", "Independent_47_5": "Independent_47_5", "SJUP": "SJUP", "Independent_47_6": "Independent_47_6", "Independent_47_7": "Independent_47_7", "Independent_47_8": "Independent_47_8", "Independent_47_9": "Independent_47_9", "Independent_47_10": "Independent_47_10", "Independent_47_11": "Independent_47_11", "Independent_47_12": "Independent_47_12", "Independent_47_13": "Independent_47_13", "Independent_47_14": "Independent_47_14", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "JPS": "JPS", "Independent_48_2": "Independent_48_2", "Independent_48_3": "Independent_48_3", "Independent_48_4": "Independent_48_4", "Independent_48_5": "Independent_48_5", "Independent_48_6": "Independent_48_6", "Independent_48_7": "Independent_48_7", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "TLBP": "TLBP", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "Independent_49_3": "Independent_49_3", "Independent_49_4": "Independent_49_4", "Independent_49_5": "Independent_49_5", "Independent_49_6": "Independent_49_6", "Independent_49_7": "Independent_49_7", "Independent_49_8": "Independent_49_8", "Independent_49_9": "Independent_49_9", "Independent_49_10": "Independent_49_10", "Independent_49_11": "Independent_49_11", "Independent_49_12": "Independent_49_12", "Independent_49_13": "Independent_49_13", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_50_3": "Independent_50_3", "Independent_50_4": "Independent_50_4", "Independent_50_5": "Independent_50_5", "Independent_50_6": "Independent_50_6", "AIMIM": "AIMIM", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_51_3": "Independent_51_3", "Independent_51_4": "Independent_51_4", "Independent_51_5": "Independent_51_5", "Independent_51_6": "Independent_51_6", "Independent_51_7": "Independent_51_7", "Independent_51_8": "Independent_51_8", "Independent_51_9": "Independent_51_9", "Independent_51_10": "Independent_51_10", "Independent_51_11": "Independent_51_11", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "Independent_52_3": "Independent_52_3", "Independent_52_4": "Independent_52_4", "Independent_52_5": "Independent_52_5", "Independent_52_6": "Independent_52_6", "Independent_52_7": "Independent_52_7", "Independent_52_8": "Independent_52_8", "Independent_52_9": "Independent_52_9", "Independent_52_10": "Independent_52_10", "Independent_52_11": "Independent_52_11", "Independent_52_12": "Independent_52_12", "Independent_52_13": "Independent_52_13", "Independent_52_14": "Independent_52_14", "Independent_52_15": "Independent_52_15", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "LSSP": "LSSP", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_54_3": "Independent_54_3", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_55_2": "Independent_55_2", "Independent_55_3": "Independent_55_3", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_56_2": "Independent_56_2", "Independent_56_3": "Independent_56_3", "Independent_56_4": "Independent_56_4", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "TYS": "TYS", "YP": "YP", "Independent_57_2": "Independent_57_2", "Independent_57_3": "Independent_57_3", "Independent_57_4": "Independent_57_4", "Independent_57_5": "Independent_57_5", "Independent_57_6": "Independent_57_6", "Independent_57_7": "Independent_57_7", "Independent_57_8": "Independent_57_8", "HEAP": "HEAP", "Independent_58_1": "Independent_58_1", "Independent_58_2": "Independent_58_2", "Independent_58_3": "Independent_58_3", "LSP": "LSP", "JD_S": "JD_S", "RJD": "RJD", "Independent_58_4": "Independent_58_4", "Independent_58_5": "Independent_58_5", "Independent_58_6": "Independent_58_6", "Independent_58_7": "Independent_58_7", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_59_2": "Independent_59_2", "Independent_59_3": "Independent_59_3", "Independent_59_4": "Independent_59_4", "Independent_59_5": "Independent_59_5", "BRPP": "BRPP", "Independent_59_6": "Independent_59_6", "Independent_59_7": "Independent_59_7", "Independent_59_8": "Independent_59_8", "Independent_59_9": "Independent_59_9", "Independent_59_10": "Independent_59_10", "Independent_59_11": "Independent_59_11", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "ABML_S": "ABML_S", "MMP": "MMP", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "Independent_60_3": "Independent_60_3", "Independent_60_4": "Independent_60_4", "Independent_60_5": "Independent_60_5", "Independent_60_6": "Independent_60_6", "Independent_60_7": "Independent_60_7", "Independent_60_8": "Independent_60_8", "Independent_60_9": "Independent_60_9", "Independent_60_10": "Independent_60_10", "Independent_60_11": "Independent_60_11", "Independent_60_12": "Independent_60_12", "NBNAP": "NBNAP", "Independent_60_13": "Independent_60_13", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "Independent_61_3": "Independent_61_3", "Independent_61_4": "Independent_61_4", "Independent_61_5": "Independent_61_5", "Independent_61_6": "Independent_61_6", "Independent_61_7": "Independent_61_7", "Independent_61_8": "Independent_61_8", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_62_3": "Independent_62_3", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "Independent_63_3": "Independent_63_3", "Independent_63_4": "Independent_63_4", "Independent_63_5": "Independent_63_5", "Independent_63_6": "Independent_63_6", "Independent_63_7": "Independent_63_7", "Independent_63_8": "Independent_63_8", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_64_2": "Independent_64_2", "MBT": "MBT", "SP_I": "SP_I", "Independent_64_3": "Independent_64_3", "NYP": "NYP", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "DEPI": "DEPI", "Independent_65_2": "Independent_65_2", "Independent_65_3": "Independent_65_3", "Independent_65_4": "Independent_65_4", "Independent_65_5": "Independent_65_5", "WPOI": "WPOI", "Independent_65_6": "Independent_65_6", "Independent_65_7": "Independent_65_7", "Independent_65_8": "Independent_65_8", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_66_2": "Independent_66_2", "Independent_66_3": "Independent_66_3", "Independent_66_4": "Independent_66_4", "Independent_66_5": "Independent_66_5", "Independent_66_6": "Independent_66_6", "Independent_66_7": "Independent_66_7", "Independent_66_8": "Independent_66_8", "Independent_67_1": "Independent_67_1", "Independent_67_2": "Independent_67_2", "Independent_67_3": "Independent_67_3", "Independent_67_4": "Independent_67_4", "Independent_67_5": "Independent_67_5", "Independent_67_6": "Independent_67_6", "Independent_67_7": "Independent_67_7", "Independent_67_8": "Independent_67_8", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "Independent_68_3": "Independent_68_3", "Independent_68_4": "Independent_68_4", "TMOR": "TMOR", "Independent_68_5": "Independent_68_5", "Independent_68_6": "Independent_68_6", "Independent_68_7": "Independent_68_7", "Independent_68_8": "Independent_68_8", "Independent_68_9": "Independent_68_9", "Independent_68_10": "Independent_68_10", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "Independent_70_2": "Independent_70_2", "Independent_70_3": "Independent_70_3", "Independent_70_4": "Independent_70_4", "Independent_70_5": "Independent_70_5", "Independent_70_6": "Independent_70_6", "Independent_70_7": "Independent_70_7", "Independent_70_8": "Independent_70_8", "Independent_70_9": "Independent_70_9", "Independent_70_10": "Independent_70_10", "Independent_70_11": "Independent_70_11", "Independent_70_12": "Independent_70_12", "Independent_70_13": "Independent_70_13", "Independent_71_1": "Independent_71_1", "Independent_71_2": "Independent_71_2", "Independent_71_3": "Independent_71_3", "Independent_71_4": "Independent_71_4", "Independent_71_5": "Independent_71_5", "Independent_71_6": "Independent_71_6", "Independent_71_7": "Independent_71_7", "Independent_71_8": "Independent_71_8", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_72_2": "Independent_72_2", "Independent_72_3": "Independent_72_3", "TCP": "TCP", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_74_2": "Independent_74_2", "Independent_74_3": "Independent_74_3", "Independent_74_4": "Independent_74_4", "Independent_74_5": "Independent_74_5", "Independent_74_6": "Independent_74_6", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_75_2": "Independent_75_2", "Independent_75_3": "Independent_75_3", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_76_3": "Independent_76_3", "Independent_76_4": "Independent_76_4", "Independent_76_5": "Independent_76_5", "Independent_76_6": "Independent_76_6", "Independent_76_7": "Independent_76_7", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_77_2": "Independent_77_2", "Independent_77_3": "Independent_77_3", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_78_2": "Independent_78_2", "Independent_78_3": "Independent_78_3", "Independent_78_4": "Independent_78_4", "Independent_79_1": "Independent_79_1", "Independent_79_2": "Independent_79_2", "Independent_79_3": "Independent_79_3", "Independent_79_4": "Independent_79_4", "Independent_79_5": "Independent_79_5", "Independent_79_6": "Independent_79_6", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_80_2": "Independent_80_2", "Independent_80_3": "Independent_80_3", "Independent_80_4": "Independent_80_4", "Independent_80_5": "Independent_80_5", "Independent_80_6": "Independent_80_6", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "Independent_81_2": "Independent_81_2", "Independent_81_3": "Independent_81_3", "Independent_81_4": "Independent_81_4", "Independent_81_5": "Independent_81_5", "Independent_81_6": "Independent_81_6", "Independent_82_1": "Independent_82_1", "Independent_82_2": "Independent_82_2", "Independent_82_3": "Independent_82_3", "Independent_82_4": "Independent_82_4", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_83_2": "Independent_83_2", "Independent_83_3": "Independent_83_3", "Independent_83_4": "Independent_83_4", "Independent_84_1": "Independent_84_1", "Independent_84_2": "Independent_84_2", "Independent_84_3": "Independent_84_3", "Independent_84_4": "Independent_84_4", "Independent_85_1": "Independent_85_1", "Independent_85_2": "Independent_85_2", "Independent_85_3": "Independent_85_3", "Independent_85_4": "Independent_85_4", "Independent_86_1": "Independent_86_1", "Independent_86_2": "Independent_86_2", "Independent_86_3": "Independent_86_3", "Independent_87_1": "Independent_87_1", "Independent_87_2": "Independent_87_2", "Independent_87_3": "Independent_87_3", "Independent_87_4": "Independent_87_4", "Independent_87_5": "Independent_87_5", "Independent_87_6": "Independent_87_6", "Independent_88_1": "Independent_88_1", "Independent_88_2": "Independent_88_2", "Independent_88_3": "Independent_88_3", "Independent_88_4": "Independent_88_4", "Independent_88_5": "Independent_88_5", "Independent_88_6": "Independent_88_6", "Independent_88_7": "Independent_88_7", "Independent_88_8": "Independent_88_8", "Independent_88_9": "Independent_88_9", "Independent_88_10": "Independent_88_10", "Independent_88_11": "Independent_88_11", "Independent_88_12": "Independent_88_12", "Independent_88_13": "Independent_88_13", "Independent_88_14": "Independent_88_14", "NVDMP": "NVDMP", "Independent_88_15": "Independent_88_15", "Independent_88_16": "Independent_88_16", "Independent_88_17": "Independent_88_17", "Independent_88_18": "Independent_88_18", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_89_2": "Independent_89_2", "Independent_89_3": "Independent_89_3", "Independent_89_4": "Independent_89_4", "Independent_89_5": "Independent_89_5", "Independent_89_6": "Independent_89_6", "Independent_89_7": "Independent_89_7", "Independent_89_8": "Independent_89_8", "Independent_90_1": "Independent_90_1", "Independent_90_2": "Independent_90_2", "Independent_90_3": "Independent_90_3", "Independent_90_4": "Independent_90_4", "Independent_90_5": "Independent_90_5", "Independent_90_6": "Independent_90_6", "Independent_90_7": "Independent_90_7", "Independent_90_8": "Independent_90_8", "Independent_91_1": "Independent_91_1", "Independent_91_2": "Independent_91_2", "Independent_91_3": "Independent_91_3", "Independent_91_4": "Independent_91_4", "Independent_91_5": "Independent_91_5", "Independent_91_6": "Independent_91_6", "Independent_91_7": "Independent_91_7", "rpsn": "rpsn", "Independent_91_8": "Independent_91_8", "Independent_91_9": "Independent_91_9", "Independent_91_10": "Independent_91_10", "Independent_91_11": "Independent_91_11", "Independent_91_12": "Independent_91_12", "Independent_91_13": "Independent_91_13", "Independent_92_1": "Independent_92_1", "Independent_92_2": "Independent_92_2", "Independent_92_3": "Independent_92_3", "Independent_92_4": "Independent_92_4", "Independent_92_5": "Independent_92_5", "Independent_92_6": "Independent_92_6", "Independent_92_7": "Independent_92_7", "Independent_92_8": "Independent_92_8", "Independent_92_9": "Independent_92_9", "Independent_92_10": "Independent_92_10", "Independent_92_11": "Independent_92_11", "Independent_93_1": "Independent_93_1", "Independent_93_2": "Independent_93_2", "Independent_93_3": "Independent_93_3", "Independent_93_4": "Independent_93_4", "Independent_93_5": "Independent_93_5", "Independent_93_6": "Independent_93_6", "YTP": "YTP", "Independent_94_1": "Independent_94_1", "Independent_94_2": "Independent_94_2", "Independent_94_3": "Independent_94_3", "Independent_94_4": "Independent_94_4", "Independent_95_1": "Independent_95_1", "YSRPP": "YSRPP", "Independent_95_2": "Independent_95_2", "Independent_96_1": "Independent_96_1", "Independent_96_2": "Independent_96_2", "Independent_96_3": "Independent_96_3", "Independent_96_4": "Independent_96_4", "Independent_96_5": "Independent_96_5", "Independent_96_6": "Independent_96_6", "Independent_96_7": "Independent_96_7", "Independent_97_1": "Independent_97_1", "Independent_97_2": "Independent_97_2", "Independent_97_3": "Independent_97_3", "Independent_97_4": "Independent_97_4", "Independent_97_5": "Independent_97_5", "Independent_98_1": "Independent_98_1", "Independent_98_2": "Independent_98_2", "Independent_98_3": "Independent_98_3", "Independent_98_4": "Independent_98_4", "Independent_98_5": "Independent_98_5", "Independent_99_1": "Independent_99_1", "Independent_99_2": "Independent_99_2", "Independent_99_3": "Independent_99_3", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_100_2": "Independent_100_2", "CPI_ML_L": "CPI_ML_L", "Independent_100_3": "Independent_100_3", "Independent_100_4": "Independent_100_4", "Independent_100_5": "Independent_100_5", "Independent_100_6": "Independent_100_6", "Independent_101_1": "Independent_101_1", "Independent_101_2": "Independent_101_2", "Independent_101_3": "Independent_101_3", "Independent_101_4": "Independent_101_4", "Independent_101_5": "Independent_101_5", "Independent_101_6": "Independent_101_6", "Independent_102_1": "Independent_102_1", "Independent_102_2": "Independent_102_2", "Independent_102_3": "Independent_102_3", "Independent_102_4": "Independent_102_4", "Independent_102_5": "Independent_102_5", "Independent_102_6": "Independent_102_6", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_103_2": "Independent_103_2", "Independent_103_3": "Independent_103_3", "Independent_103_4": "Independent_103_4", "Independent_104_1": "Independent_104_1", "Independent_104_2": "Independent_104_2", "Independent_104_3": "Independent_104_3", "Independent_104_4": "Independent_104_4", "Independent_104_5": "Independent_104_5", "INCP": "INCP", "Independent_105_1": "Independent_105_1", "Independent_105_2": "Independent_105_2", "Independent_105_3": "Independent_105_3", "Independent_105_4": "Independent_105_4", "Independent_105_5": "Independent_105_5", "Independent_105_6": "Independent_105_6", "Independent_105_7": "Independent_105_7", "Independent_105_8": "Independent_105_8", "Independent_106_1": "Independent_106_1", "Independent_106_2": "Independent_106_2", "Independent_106_3": "Independent_106_3", "Independent_106_4": "Independent_106_4", "Independent_106_5": "Independent_106_5", "Independent_106_6": "Independent_106_6", "Independent_106_7": "Independent_106_7", "Independent_106_8": "Independent_106_8", "Independent_106_9": "Independent_106_9", "Independent_106_10": "Independent_106_10", "Independent_106_11": "Independent_106_11", "Independent_106_12": "Independent_106_12", "Independent_106_13": "Independent_106_13", "Independent_106_14": "Independent_106_14", "Independent_107_1": "Independent_107_1", "Independent_107_2": "Independent_107_2", "Independent_107_3": "Independent_107_3", "Independent_107_4": "Independent_107_4", "Independent_107_5": "Independent_107_5", "Independent_107_6": "Independent_107_6", "Independent_108_1": "Independent_108_1", "Independent_108_2": "Independent_108_2", "Independent_108_3": "Independent_108_3", "Independent_108_4": "Independent_108_4", "Independent_108_5": "Independent_108_5", "Independent_108_6": "Independent_108_6", "Independent_109_1": "Independent_109_1", "Independent_109_2": "Independent_109_2", "Independent_109_3": "Independent_109_3", "Independent_109_4": "Independent_109_4", "Independent_109_5": "Independent_109_5", "Independent_109_6": "Independent_109_6", "Independent_109_7": "Independent_109_7", "Independent_110_1": "Independent_110_1", "Independent_110_2": "Independent_110_2", "Independent_110_3": "Independent_110_3", "Independent_110_4": "Independent_110_4", "Independent_110_5": "Independent_110_5", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "Independent_111_2": "Independent_111_2", "Independent_111_3": "Independent_111_3", "Independent_111_4": "Independent_111_4", "Independent_111_5": "Independent_111_5", "Independent_111_6": "Independent_111_6", "Independent_111_7": "Independent_111_7", "Independent_111_8": "Independent_111_8", "Independent_111_9": "Independent_111_9", "Independent_111_10": "Independent_111_10", "Independent_111_11": "Independent_111_11", "Independent_111_12": "Independent_111_12", "Independent_112_1": "Independent_112_1", "Independent_112_2": "Independent_112_2", "Independent_112_3": "Independent_112_3", "Independent_112_4": "Independent_112_4", "Independent_112_5": "Independent_112_5", "Independent_112_6": "Independent_112_6", "Independent_112_7": "Independent_112_7", "Independent_113_1": "Independent_113_1", "Independent_113_2": "Independent_113_2", "Independent_113_3": "Independent_113_3", "Independent_113_4": "Independent_113_4", "Independent_113_5": "Independent_113_5", "Independent_113_6": "Independent_113_6", "Independent_114_1": "Independent_114_1", "Independent_114_2": "Independent_114_2", "Independent_114_3": "Independent_114_3", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_115_2": "Independent_115_2", "Independent_115_3": "Independent_115_3", "Independent_115_4": "Independent_115_4", "Independent_115_5": "Independent_115_5", "Independent_115_6": "Independent_115_6", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "Independent_116_2": "Independent_116_2", "Independent_116_3": "Independent_116_3", "Independent_117_1": "Independent_117_1", "Independent_117_2": "Independent_117_2", "Independent_117_3": "Independent_117_3", "Independent_117_4": "Independent_117_4", "Independent_117_5": "Independent_117_5", "Independent_117_6": "Independent_117_6", "Independent_117_7": "Independent_117_7", "Independent_117_8": "Independent_117_8", "Independent_117_9": "Independent_117_9", "Independent_118_1": "Independent_118_1", "Independent_118_2": "Independent_118_2", "Independent_118_3": "Independent_118_3", "Independent_118_4": "Independent_118_4", "Independent_119_1": "Independent_119_1", "Independent_119_2": "Independent_119_2", "Independent_119_3": "Independent_119_3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 119, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 119, "cast_gt_registered": 119}, "n_stations_flagged": 119, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:39:22.324630", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.604, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.56, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.482, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.363, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.069, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.482, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.482, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.363, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.277, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.277, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.623, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.546, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.546, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 119}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ac0b71934962469f82d993c15649c073", "name": "India 2017 local (overnight india-punjab-2017-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2017, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Punjab/Punjab_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"BJP_DINESH_SINGH": "BJP_DINESH_SINGH", "INC_AMIT_SINGH": "INC_AMIT_SINGH", "Independent_001_SUJANPUR_1": "Independent_001_SUJANPUR_1", "RMPOI_NATHA_SINGH": "RMPOI_NATHA_SINGH", "AAAP_KULBHUSHAN_SINGH": "AAAP_KULBHUSHAN_SINGH", "BSP_KARNAIL_CHAND": "BSP_KARNAIL_CHAND", "NOTA_None_of_the_Above": "NOTA_None_of_the_Above", "APPA_ROMESH_SINGH_JASROTIA": "APPA_ROMESH_SINGH_JASROTIA", "SHS_SAURAB_DUBEY": "SHS_SAURAB_DUBEY", "Independent_001_SUJANPUR_2": "Independent_001_SUJANPUR_2", "INC_JOGINDER_PAL": "INC_JOGINDER_PAL", "BJP_SEEMA_KUMARI": "BJP_SEEMA_KUMARI", "RMPOI_LAL_CHAND_KATARUCHAK": "RMPOI_LAL_CHAND_KATARUCHAK", "AAAP_AMARJEET_SINGH": "AAAP_AMARJEET_SINGH", "Independent_002_BHOA_1": "Independent_002_BHOA_1", "BSP_CHAIN_SINGH": "BSP_CHAIN_SINGH", "Independent_002_BHOA_2": "Independent_002_BHOA_2", "AITC_MASTER_SAMPURAN_SINGH_SAIDIPUR": "AITC_MASTER_SAMPURAN_SINGH_SAIDIPUR", "HINUP_BALBIR_SINGH": "HINUP_BALBIR_SINGH", "Independent_002_BHOA_3": "Independent_002_BHOA_3", "APPA_ANIKA_RAY": "APPA_ANIKA_RAY", "Independent_002_BHOA_4": "Independent_002_BHOA_4", "Independent_002_BHOA_5": "Independent_002_BHOA_5", "Independent_002_BHOA_6": "Independent_002_BHOA_6", "SHS_BOBBY_SANDHU": "SHS_BOBBY_SANDHU", "Independent_002_BHOA_7": "Independent_002_BHOA_7", "INC_AMIT": "INC_AMIT", "BJP_ASHWANI_KUMAR": "BJP_ASHWANI_KUMAR", "AAAP_RAJ_KUMAR": "AAAP_RAJ_KUMAR", "Independent_003_PATHANKOT_1": "Independent_003_PATHANKOT_1", "BSP_ANKUR_KHAJURIA": "BSP_ANKUR_KHAJURIA", "SHS_SAT_PAL": "SHS_SAT_PAL", "Independent_003_PATHANKOT_2": "Independent_003_PATHANKOT_2", "APPA_SUNITA_DEVI": "APPA_SUNITA_DEVI", "HINUP_RAVI_KUMAR": "HINUP_RAVI_KUMAR", "HSS_KIRAN_BALA": "HSS_KIRAN_BALA", "INC_BARINDERMEET_SINGH_PAHRA": "INC_BARINDERMEET_SINGH_PAHRA", "SAD_GURBACHAN_SINGH_BABEHALI": "SAD_GURBACHAN_SINGH_BABEHALI", "AAAP_AMARJIT_SINGH_CHAHAL": "AAAP_AMARJIT_SINGH_CHAHAL", "APPA_SUCHA_SINGH_CHHOTEPUR": "APPA_SUCHA_SINGH_CHHOTEPUR", "HSS_SANDEEP_KUMAR": "HSS_SANDEEP_KUMAR", "BSP_MAJOR_SOM_NATH": "BSP_MAJOR_SOM_NATH", "HINUP_PANKAJ": "HINUP_PANKAJ", "Independent_004_GURDASPUR_1": "Independent_004_GURDASPUR_1", "INC_ARUNA_CHAUDHARY": "INC_ARUNA_CHAUDHARY", "BJP_BISHAN_DASS": "BJP_BISHAN_DASS", "AAAP_JOGINDER_SINGH": "AAAP_JOGINDER_SINGH", "CPI_SUBASH_CHANDER": "CPI_SUBASH_CHANDER", "Independent_005_DINA_NAGAR_1": "Independent_005_DINA_NAGAR_1", "APPA_SARWAN_SINGH": "APPA_SARWAN_SINGH", "BSP_RAJ_KUMAR": "BSP_RAJ_KUMAR", "Independent_005_DINA_NAGAR_2": "Independent_005_DINA_NAGAR_2", "HINUP_RAJINDER_KUMAR": "HINUP_RAJINDER_KUMAR", "INC_FATEHJANG_SINGH_BAJWA": "INC_FATEHJANG_SINGH_BAJWA", "SAD_SEWA_SINGH": "SAD_SEWA_SINGH", "AAAP_KANWAL_PREET_SINGH": "AAAP_KANWAL_PREET_SINGH", "BSP_MOHINDER_SINGH": "BSP_MOHINDER_SINGH", "SAD_M_GURBACHAN_SINGH": "SAD_M_GURBACHAN_SINGH", "Independent_006_QADIAN_1": "Independent_006_QADIAN_1", "Independent_006_QADIAN_2": "Independent_006_QADIAN_2", "CPI_ML_L_VIJAY_KUMAR": "CPI_ML_L_VIJAY_KUMAR", "Independent_006_QADIAN_3": "Independent_006_QADIAN_3", "HSS_ROHIT_GUPTA": "HSS_ROHIT_GUPTA", "APPA_KULWANT_SINGH": "APPA_KULWANT_SINGH", "HINUP_RAMAN_KUMAR": "HINUP_RAMAN_KUMAR", "SAD_LAKHBIR_SINGH_LODHINANGAL": "SAD_LAKHBIR_SINGH_LODHINANGAL", "INC_ASHWANI_SEKHRI": "INC_ASHWANI_SEKHRI", "AAAP_GURPREET_SINGH_GHUGGI": "AAAP_GURPREET_SINGH_GHUGGI", "APPA_INDER_SEKHRI": "APPA_INDER_SEKHRI", "Independent_007_BATALA_1": "Independent_007_BATALA_1", "BSP_BAKHSHIS_SINGH": "BSP_BAKHSHIS_SINGH", "Independent_007_BATALA_2": "Independent_007_BATALA_2", "Independent_007_BATALA_3": "Independent_007_BATALA_3", "CPM_AVTAR_SINGH": "CPM_AVTAR_SINGH", "Independent_007_BATALA_4": "Independent_007_BATALA_4", "Independent_007_BATALA_5": "Independent_007_BATALA_5", "Independent_007_BATALA_6": "Independent_007_BATALA_6", "Independent_007_BATALA_7": "Independent_007_BATALA_7", "INC_BALWINDER_SINGH": "INC_BALWINDER_SINGH", "SAD_MANJIT_SINGH": "SAD_MANJIT_SINGH", "AAAP_AMARPAL_SINGH": "AAAP_AMARPAL_SINGH", "APPA_OM_PARKASH": "APPA_OM_PARKASH", "BSP_GURMEET_SINGH": "BSP_GURMEET_SINGH", "Independent_008_SRI_HARGOBINDPUR_1": "Independent_008_SRI_HARGOBINDPUR_1", "Independent_008_SRI_HARGOBINDPUR_2": "Independent_008_SRI_HARGOBINDPUR_2", "INC_TRIPT_RAJINDER_SINGH_BAJWA": "INC_TRIPT_RAJINDER_SINGH_BAJWA", "SAD_NIRMAL_SINGH_KAHLON": "SAD_NIRMAL_SINGH_KAHLON", "AAAP_GURVINDER_SINGH_SHAMPURA": "AAAP_GURVINDER_SINGH_SHAMPURA", "CPI_ML_L_GULZAR_SINGH": "CPI_ML_L_GULZAR_SINGH", "BSP_AMARJIT_SINGH": "BSP_AMARJIT_SINGH", "APPA_PETER_MASIH": "APPA_PETER_MASIH", "Independent_009_FATEHGARH_CHURIAN_1": "Independent_009_FATEHGARH_CHURIAN_1", "INC_SUKHJINDER_SINGH_RANDHAWA": "INC_SUKHJINDER_SINGH_RANDHAWA", "SAD_SUCHA_SINGH_LANGAH": "SAD_SUCHA_SINGH_LANGAH", "AAAP_GURPARTAP_SINGH_KHUSHALPUR": "AAAP_GURPARTAP_SINGH_KHUSHALPUR", "APPA_DEEPINDER_SINGH": "APPA_DEEPINDER_SINGH", "Independent_010_DERA_BABA_NANAK_1": "Independent_010_DERA_BABA_NANAK_1", "Independent_010_DERA_BABA_NANAK_2": "Independent_010_DERA_BABA_NANAK_2", "Independent_010_DERA_BABA_NANAK_3": "Independent_010_DERA_BABA_NANAK_3", "BSP_JASBIR_SINGH": "BSP_JASBIR_SINGH", "AITC_BALJIT_SINGH": "AITC_BALJIT_SINGH", "HINUP_SURJIT_SINGH": "HINUP_SURJIT_SINGH", "INC_HARPARTAP_SINGH": "INC_HARPARTAP_SINGH", "SAD_AMARPAL_SINGH_BONY_AJNALA": "SAD_AMARPAL_SINGH_BONY_AJNALA", "AAAP_RAJPREET_SINGH": "AAAP_RAJPREET_SINGH", "BSP_BALWINDER_SINGH": "BSP_BALWINDER_SINGH", "Independent_011_AJNALA_1": "Independent_011_AJNALA_1", "RMPOI_GURNAM_SINGH": "RMPOI_GURNAM_SINGH", "Independent_011_AJNALA_2": "Independent_011_AJNALA_2", "SAD_M_AMRIK_SINGH": "SAD_M_AMRIK_SINGH", "Independent_011_AJNALA_3": "Independent_011_AJNALA_3", "SHS_PAWAN_SAREEN": "SHS_PAWAN_SAREEN", "APPA_RABART_MASIH": "APPA_RABART_MASIH", "BSP_A_SATNAM_SINGH": "BSP_A_SATNAM_SINGH", "Independent_011_AJNALA_4": "Independent_011_AJNALA_4", "Independent_011_AJNALA_5": "Independent_011_AJNALA_5", "BMUP_HARPREET_SINGH": "BMUP_HARPREET_SINGH", "INC_SUKHBINDER_SINGH_SARKARIA": "INC_SUKHBINDER_SINGH_SARKARIA", "SAD_VIR_SINGH_LOPOKE": "SAD_VIR_SINGH_LOPOKE", "AAAP_JAGJOT_SINGH_DHILLON": "AAAP_JAGJOT_SINGH_DHILLON", "RMPOI_VIRSA_SINGH": "RMPOI_VIRSA_SINGH", "DPIN_SARDOOL_SINGH": "DPIN_SARDOOL_SINGH", "BSP_LAKHBIR_SINGH": "BSP_LAKHBIR_SINGH", "Independent_012_RAJA_SANSI_1": "Independent_012_RAJA_SANSI_1", "Independent_012_RAJA_SANSI_2": "Independent_012_RAJA_SANSI_2", "Independent_012_RAJA_SANSI_3": "Independent_012_RAJA_SANSI_3", "SAD_BIKRAM_SINGH_MAJITHIA": "SAD_BIKRAM_SINGH_MAJITHIA", "INC_SUKHJINDER_RAJ_SINGH_LALLI": "INC_SUKHJINDER_RAJ_SINGH_LALLI", "AAAP_HIMMAT_SINGH_SHERGILL": "AAAP_HIMMAT_SINGH_SHERGILL", "BSP_SURJIT_SINGH": "BSP_SURJIT_SINGH", "SAD_M_KULWANT_SINGH": "SAD_M_KULWANT_SINGH", "Independent_013_MAJITHA_1": "Independent_013_MAJITHA_1", "Independent_013_MAJITHA_2": "Independent_013_MAJITHA_2", "Independent_013_MAJITHA_3": "Independent_013_MAJITHA_3", "Independent_013_MAJITHA_4": "Independent_013_MAJITHA_4", "Independent_013_MAJITHA_5": "Independent_013_MAJITHA_5", "INC_SUKHWINDER_SINGH_DANNY_BANDALA": "INC_SUKHWINDER_SINGH_DANNY_BANDALA", "SAD_DALBIR_SINGH": "SAD_DALBIR_SINGH", "AAAP_HARBHAJAN_SINGH_E_T_O": "AAAP_HARBHAJAN_SINGH_E_T_O", "BSP_SATPAL_SINGH_PAKHOKE": "BSP_SATPAL_SINGH_PAKHOKE", "BSP_A_HARDEEP_SINGH": "BSP_A_HARDEEP_SINGH", "DPIN_VIKRAMJIT_SINGH": "DPIN_VIKRAMJIT_SINGH", "Independent_014_JANDIALA_1": "Independent_014_JANDIALA_1", "APPA_DALIP_SINGH": "APPA_DALIP_SINGH", "INC_SUNIL_DUTTI": "INC_SUNIL_DUTTI", "BJP_ANIL_JOSHI": "BJP_ANIL_JOSHI", "AAAP_MANISH_AGGARWAL": "AAAP_MANISH_AGGARWAL", "BSP_MANJIT_SINGH": "BSP_MANJIT_SINGH", "Independent_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH_1": "Independent_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH_1", "ABSD_SUSHIL_KUMAR": "ABSD_SUSHIL_KUMAR", "Independent_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH_2": "Independent_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH_2", "Independent_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH_3": "Independent_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH_3", "HSS_RAHUL_KHOSLA": "HSS_RAHUL_KHOSLA", "SLDP_GAURAV_MEHRA": "SLDP_GAURAV_MEHRA", "APPA_MANISH_SHRIDHAR": "APPA_MANISH_SHRIDHAR", "Independent_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH_4": "Independent_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH_4", "Independent_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH_5": "Independent_015_AMRITSAR_NORTH_5", "INC_RAJ_KUMAR_VERKA": "INC_RAJ_KUMAR_VERKA", "BJP_RAKESH_GILL": "BJP_RAKESH_GILL", "AAAP_BALWINDER_SINGH_SAHOTA": "AAAP_BALWINDER_SINGH_SAHOTA", "CPI_GURNAM_KAUR": "CPI_GURNAM_KAUR", "BSP_JASWANT_SINGH": "BSP_JASWANT_SINGH", "ABSD_SATNAM_SINGH": "ABSD_SATNAM_SINGH", "DEMSWP_BALWINDER_SINGH": "DEMSWP_BALWINDER_SINGH", "SLDP_LAKHBIR_SINGH": "SLDP_LAKHBIR_SINGH", "Independent_016_AMRITSAR_WEST_1": "Independent_016_AMRITSAR_WEST_1", "DCP_SHAM_LAL_GANDHIWADI": "DCP_SHAM_LAL_GANDHIWADI", "INC_OM_PARKASH_SONI": "INC_OM_PARKASH_SONI", "BJP_TARUN_CHUGH": "BJP_TARUN_CHUGH", "AAAP_AJAY_GUPTA": "AAAP_AJAY_GUPTA", "BSP_RAJESH_KUMAR": "BSP_RAJESH_KUMAR", "Independent_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL_1": "Independent_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL_1", "Independent_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL_2": "Independent_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL_2", "DEMSWP_ASHOK_KUMAR": "DEMSWP_ASHOK_KUMAR", "APPA_KESHAV_KOHLI": "APPA_KESHAV_KOHLI", "Independent_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL_3": "Independent_017_AMRITSAR_CENTRAL_3", "INC_NAVJOT_SINGH_SIDHU": "INC_NAVJOT_SINGH_SIDHU", "BJP_RAJESH_KUMAR_HONEY": "BJP_RAJESH_KUMAR_HONEY", "AAAP_SARABJOT_SINGH_DHANJAL": "AAAP_SARABJOT_SINGH_DHANJAL", "Independent_018_AMRITSAR_EAST_1": "Independent_018_AMRITSAR_EAST_1", "CPI_BALDEV_SINGH": "CPI_BALDEV_SINGH", "BSP_TARSEM_SINGH": "BSP_TARSEM_SINGH", "Independent_018_AMRITSAR_EAST_2": "Independent_018_AMRITSAR_EAST_2", "APPA_NARINDER_SINGH": "APPA_NARINDER_SINGH", "RPI_A_SANDEEP_SINGH": "RPI_A_SANDEEP_SINGH", "DPIN_AMITA": "DPIN_AMITA", "Independent_018_AMRITSAR_EAST_3": "Independent_018_AMRITSAR_EAST_3", "Independent_018_AMRITSAR_EAST_4": "Independent_018_AMRITSAR_EAST_4", "ABSD_SANT_BALDEV_SINGH_RATHOR": "ABSD_SANT_BALDEV_SINGH_RATHOR", "BMUP_TARSEM_LAL": "BMUP_TARSEM_LAL", "Independent_018_AMRITSAR_EAST_5": "Independent_018_AMRITSAR_EAST_5", "INC_INDERBIR_SINGH_BOLARIA": "INC_INDERBIR_SINGH_BOLARIA", "AAAP_INDERBIR_SINGH_NIJJAR": "AAAP_INDERBIR_SINGH_NIJJAR", "SAD_GURPARTAP_SINGH_TIKKA": "SAD_GURPARTAP_SINGH_TIKKA", "Independent_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH_1": "Independent_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH_1", "CPI_LAKHWINDER_SINGH": "CPI_LAKHWINDER_SINGH", "BSP_SUSHIL_KUMAR": "BSP_SUSHIL_KUMAR", "DEMSWP_DR_SUBA_SINGH": "DEMSWP_DR_SUBA_SINGH", "Independent_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH_2": "Independent_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH_2", "APPA_KULDIP_SINGH": "APPA_KULDIP_SINGH", "Independent_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH_3": "Independent_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH_3", "Independent_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH_4": "Independent_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH_4", "Independent_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH_5": "Independent_019_AMRITSAR_SOUTH_5", "INC_TARSEM_SINGH_D_C": "INC_TARSEM_SINGH_D_C", "SAD_GULZAR_SINGH_RANIKE": "SAD_GULZAR_SINGH_RANIKE", "AAAP_JASWINDER_SINGH_JAHANGIR": "AAAP_JASWINDER_SINGH_JAHANGIR", "CPI_GURDEEP_SINGH": "CPI_GURDEEP_SINGH", "BSP_SUKHWANTJIT_KAUR": "BSP_SUKHWANTJIT_KAUR", "BSP_A_SARBJIT_KUMAR": "BSP_A_SARBJIT_KUMAR", "SLDP_MANJIT_SINGH": "SLDP_MANJIT_SINGH", "DEMSWP_JAGTAR_SINGH_GILL": "DEMSWP_JAGTAR_SINGH_GILL", "Independent_020_ATTARI_1": "Independent_020_ATTARI_1", "DPIN_MOHINDER_SINGH": "DPIN_MOHINDER_SINGH", "APPA_HARDEV_SINGH": "APPA_HARDEV_SINGH", "INC_DR_DHARAMBIR_AGNIHOTRI": "INC_DR_DHARAMBIR_AGNIHOTRI", "SAD_HARMEET_SINGH_SANDHU": "SAD_HARMEET_SINGH_SANDHU", "AAAP_KARTAR_SINGH_PEHALWAN": "AAAP_KARTAR_SINGH_PEHALWAN", "CPM_SUKHDEV_SINGH": "CPM_SUKHDEV_SINGH", "SAD_M_GURJINDER_SINGH": "SAD_M_GURJINDER_SINGH", "APPA_GURWINDER_SINGH": "APPA_GURWINDER_SINGH", "BSP_ANANTJIT_SINGH": "BSP_ANANTJIT_SINGH", "BSP_A_BALBIR_SINGH_TIRATH_PADHRI": "BSP_A_BALBIR_SINGH_TIRATH_PADHRI", "INC_SUKHPAL_SINGH_BHULLAR": "INC_SUKHPAL_SINGH_BHULLAR", "SAD_VIRSA_SINGH": "SAD_VIRSA_SINGH", "AAAP_BIKRAMAJIT_SINGH": "AAAP_BIKRAMAJIT_SINGH", "RMPOI_DALJIT_SINGH": "RMPOI_DALJIT_SINGH", "Independent_022_KHEM_KARAN_1": "Independent_022_KHEM_KARAN_1", "INC_HARMINDER_SINGH_GILL": "INC_HARMINDER_SINGH_GILL", "SAD_ADESH_PARTAP_SINGH_KAIRON": "SAD_ADESH_PARTAP_SINGH_KAIRON", "AAAP_RANJIT_SINGH_CHEEMA": "AAAP_RANJIT_SINGH_CHEEMA", "BSP_AVTAR_SINGH": "BSP_AVTAR_SINGH", "Independent_023_PATTI_1": "Independent_023_PATTI_1", "Independent_023_PATTI_2": "Independent_023_PATTI_2", "Independent_023_PATTI_3": "Independent_023_PATTI_3", "SAD_M_BHUPINDER_SINGH": "SAD_M_BHUPINDER_SINGH", "BSP_A_JATINDER_SINGH_PANNU": "BSP_A_JATINDER_SINGH_PANNU", "INC_RAMANJEET_SINGH_SAHOTA_SIKKI": "INC_RAMANJEET_SINGH_SAHOTA_SIKKI", "SAD_RAVINDER_SINGH_BRAHAMPURA": "SAD_RAVINDER_SINGH_BRAHAMPURA", "AAAP_BHUPINDER_SINGH": "AAAP_BHUPINDER_SINGH", "CPI_BALDEV_SINGH_DHUNDA": "CPI_BALDEV_SINGH_DHUNDA", "SAD_M_KARAM_SINGH_BHOIAN": "SAD_M_KARAM_SINGH_BHOIAN", "BSP_DYAL_SINGH": "BSP_DYAL_SINGH", "APPA_DALJIT_SINGH": "APPA_DALJIT_SINGH", "Independent_024_KHADOOR_SAHIB_1": "Independent_024_KHADOOR_SAHIB_1", "INC_SANTOKH_SINGH": "INC_SANTOKH_SINGH", "AAAP_DALBIR_SINGH_TONG": "AAAP_DALBIR_SINGH_TONG", "SAD_MALKIAT_SINGH": "SAD_MALKIAT_SINGH", "RMPOI_AMRIK_SINGH": "RMPOI_AMRIK_SINGH", "APPA_BALJIT_SINGH_BHATTI": "APPA_BALJIT_SINGH_BHATTI", "DEMSWP_KAMALJIT_SINGH": "DEMSWP_KAMALJIT_SINGH", "BSP_SWINDER_SINGH": "BSP_SWINDER_SINGH", "AAAP_SUKHPAL_SINGH_KHAIRA": "AAAP_SUKHPAL_SINGH_KHAIRA", "SAD_YUVRAJ_BHUPINDER_SINGH": "SAD_YUVRAJ_BHUPINDER_SINGH", "INC_RANJIT_SINGH_RANA": "INC_RANJIT_SINGH_RANA", "SAD_M_RAJINDER_SINGH_FAUJI": "SAD_M_RAJINDER_SINGH_FAUJI", "BSP_SATPAL": "BSP_SATPAL", "APPA_GURBINDER_SINGH": "APPA_GURBINDER_SINGH", "DBSP_GURDEEP_SINGH": "DBSP_GURDEEP_SINGH", "DPIN_SATPAL_KIMTI": "DPIN_SATPAL_KIMTI", "NCP_RAMAN_KUMAR": "NCP_RAMAN_KUMAR", "INC_RANA_GURJIT_SINGH": "INC_RANA_GURJIT_SINGH", "SAD_ADVOCATE_PARAMJIT_SINGH": "SAD_ADVOCATE_PARAMJIT_SINGH", "AAAP_SUKHWANT_SINGH_PADDA": "AAAP_SUKHWANT_SINGH_PADDA", "BSP_A_MANOJ_KUMAR_NAHAR": "BSP_A_MANOJ_KUMAR_NAHAR", "SAD_M_NARINDER_SINGH": "SAD_M_NARINDER_SINGH", "Independent_027_KAPURTHALA_1": "Independent_027_KAPURTHALA_1", "RKSP_SATISH_KUMAR_NAHAR": "RKSP_SATISH_KUMAR_NAHAR", "Independent_027_KAPURTHALA_2": "Independent_027_KAPURTHALA_2", "INC_NAVTEJ_SINGH_CHEEMA": "INC_NAVTEJ_SINGH_CHEEMA", "SAD_UPINDERJIT_KAUR": "SAD_UPINDERJIT_KAUR", "AAAP_SAJJAN_SINGH_CHEEMA": "AAAP_SAJJAN_SINGH_CHEEMA", "BSP_PIYARA_SINGH_JAINPURI": "BSP_PIYARA_SINGH_JAINPURI", "RMPOI_BALDEV_SINGH": "RMPOI_BALDEV_SINGH", "BSP_A_BALWANT_SINGH_SULTANPURI": "BSP_A_BALWANT_SINGH_SULTANPURI", "Independent_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI_1": "Independent_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI_1", "SAD_M_MUKHTIYAR_SINGH": "SAD_M_MUKHTIYAR_SINGH", "Independent_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI_2": "Independent_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI_2", "Independent_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI_3": "Independent_028_SULTANPUR_LODHI_3", "APPA_SURAT_SINGH": "APPA_SURAT_SINGH", "BJP_SOM_PARKASH": "BJP_SOM_PARKASH", "INC_JOGINDER_SINGH_MANN": "INC_JOGINDER_SINGH_MANN", "AAAP_JARNAIL_NANGAL": "AAAP_JARNAIL_NANGAL", "BSP_SURINDER_DHANDA": "BSP_SURINDER_DHANDA", "Independent_029_PHAGWARA_1": "Independent_029_PHAGWARA_1", "BMUP_TIRATH_RAM": "BMUP_TIRATH_RAM", "BSP_A_TULSI_RAM_KHOSLA": "BSP_A_TULSI_RAM_KHOSLA", "SAD_BALDEV_SINGH_KHAIRA": "SAD_BALDEV_SINGH_KHAIRA", "INC_VIKRAMJIT_SINGH_CHAUDHARY": "INC_VIKRAMJIT_SINGH_CHAUDHARY", "AAAP_SAROOP_SINGH_KADIANA": "AAAP_SAROOP_SINGH_KADIANA", "BSP_AVTAR_SINGH_KARIMPURI": "BSP_AVTAR_SINGH_KARIMPURI", "RMPOI_PARMJIT_RANDHAWA": "RMPOI_PARMJIT_RANDHAWA", "LIP_SANJAY_KUMAR_SHALU": "LIP_SANJAY_KUMAR_SHALU", "BRP_BALWINDER_SINGH": "BRP_BALWINDER_SINGH", "Independent_030_PHILLAUR_1": "Independent_030_PHILLAUR_1", "SAD_GURPRATAP_SINGH_WADALA": "SAD_GURPRATAP_SINGH_WADALA", "AAAP_SARWAN_SINGH_HAYER": "AAAP_SARWAN_SINGH_HAYER", "INC_JAGBIR_SINGH_BRAR": "INC_JAGBIR_SINGH_BRAR", "BSP_TARANPAL_SINGH": "BSP_TARANPAL_SINGH", "Independent_031_NAKODAR_1": "Independent_031_NAKODAR_1", "RMPOI_SANTOKH_SINGH_BILGA": "RMPOI_SANTOKH_SINGH_BILGA", "BSP_A_INDERJIT_KAUR": "BSP_A_INDERJIT_KAUR", "Independent_031_NAKODAR_2": "Independent_031_NAKODAR_2", "APPA_GURMAIL_SINGH_KALER": "APPA_GURMAIL_SINGH_KALER", "SAD_AJIT_SINGH_KOHAR": "SAD_AJIT_SINGH_KOHAR", "INC_HARDEV_SINGH_LADI": "INC_HARDEV_SINGH_LADI", "AAAP_AMARJIT_SINGH_MEHATPUR": "AAAP_AMARJIT_SINGH_MEHATPUR", "BSP_CHARANJIT_KUMAR_NAHAR": "BSP_CHARANJIT_KUMAR_NAHAR", "CPM_BACHITTAR_SINGH": "CPM_BACHITTAR_SINGH", "Independent_032_SHAHKOT_1": "Independent_032_SHAHKOT_1", "BSP_A_TARA_SINGH_GILL": "BSP_A_TARA_SINGH_GILL", "SAD_M_SULAKHAN_SINGH": "SAD_M_SULAKHAN_SINGH", "APPA_HARSHDEEP_SINGH_SANDHU": "APPA_HARSHDEEP_SINGH_SANDHU", "IKL_GURCHARAN_SINGH": "IKL_GURCHARAN_SINGH", "AITC_PAL_SINGH": "AITC_PAL_SINGH", "INC_CHAUDHARY_SURINDER_SINGH": "INC_CHAUDHARY_SURINDER_SINGH", "SAD_SETH_SAT_PAUL": "SAD_SETH_SAT_PAUL", "AAAP_CHANDER_KUMAR_GREWAL": "AAAP_CHANDER_KUMAR_GREWAL", "BSP_BALWINDER_KUMAR": "BSP_BALWINDER_KUMAR", "Independent_033_KARTARPUR_1": "Independent_033_KARTARPUR_1", "Independent_033_KARTARPUR_2": "Independent_033_KARTARPUR_2", "DBSP_GURMUKH_SINGH_KHOSLA": "DBSP_GURMUKH_SINGH_KHOSLA", "Independent_033_KARTARPUR_3": "Independent_033_KARTARPUR_3", "BSP_A_PARAMJOT_GILL": "BSP_A_PARAMJOT_GILL", "Independent_033_KARTARPUR_4": "Independent_033_KARTARPUR_4", "RKSP_BALVIR_KAUR": "RKSP_BALVIR_KAUR", "INC_SUSHIL_KUMAR_RINKU": "INC_SUSHIL_KUMAR_RINKU", "BJP_MAHINDER_PAL_BHAGAT": "BJP_MAHINDER_PAL_BHAGAT", "AAAP_DARSHAN_LAL_BHAGAT": "AAAP_DARSHAN_LAL_BHAGAT", "Independent_034_JALANDHAR_WEST_1": "Independent_034_JALANDHAR_WEST_1", "BSP_PARAMJEET_MALL": "BSP_PARAMJEET_MALL", "SHS_SUBHASH_GORIA": "SHS_SUBHASH_GORIA", "APPA_JUGAL_KISHORE": "APPA_JUGAL_KISHORE", "INC_RAJINDER_BERI": "INC_RAJINDER_BERI", "BJP_MANORANJAN_KALIA": "BJP_MANORANJAN_KALIA", "AAAP_DR_SANJIV_SHARMA": "AAAP_DR_SANJIV_SHARMA", "BSP_MADAN_BHATTI": "BSP_MADAN_BHATTI", "AITC_TARANDIP_SINGH": "AITC_TARANDIP_SINGH", "SAD_M_PARMINDER_SINGH_CHEEMA": "SAD_M_PARMINDER_SINGH_CHEEMA", "SHS_ROHIT_JOSHI": "SHS_ROHIT_JOSHI", "NCP_RANVIR_SINGH": "NCP_RANVIR_SINGH", "Independent_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL_1": "Independent_035_JALANDHAR_CENTRAL_1", "KYP_VIKRAM_KULJIT_SINGH": "KYP_VIKRAM_KULJIT_SINGH", "INC_AVTAR_SINGH_JUNIOR": "INC_AVTAR_SINGH_JUNIOR", "BJP_K_D_BHANDARI": "BJP_K_D_BHANDARI", "AAAP_GULSHAN_SHARMA": "AAAP_GULSHAN_SHARMA", "BSP_HARDWARI_LAL": "BSP_HARDWARI_LAL", "Independent_036_JALANDHAR_NORTH_1": "Independent_036_JALANDHAR_NORTH_1", "NCP_SURINDER_SINGH_ARORA": "NCP_SURINDER_SINGH_ARORA", "APPA_NARESH_GUPTA": "APPA_NARESH_GUPTA", "KYP_ANTARJOT_SINGH": "KYP_ANTARJOT_SINGH", "Independent_036_JALANDHAR_NORTH_2": "Independent_036_JALANDHAR_NORTH_2", "BMUP_KEWAL_BHATTI": "BMUP_KEWAL_BHATTI", "HSS_KEWAL_SINGH_BHASULLA": "HSS_KEWAL_SINGH_BHASULLA", "INC_PARGAT_SINGH_POWAR": "INC_PARGAT_SINGH_POWAR", "SAD_SARABJIT_SINGH_MAKKAR": "SAD_SARABJIT_SINGH_MAKKAR", "AAAP_HARKRISHAN_SINGH_WALIA": "AAAP_HARKRISHAN_SINGH_WALIA", "BSP_Amrik_Bagri": "BSP_Amrik_Bagri", "BSP_A_DHARAM_PAL": "BSP_A_DHARAM_PAL", "DPI_HARVINDER_SINGH": "DPI_HARVINDER_SINGH", "SAD_M_GURMUKH_SINGH": "SAD_M_GURMUKH_SINGH", "BRPP_MANJIT_SINGH": "BRPP_MANJIT_SINGH", "SAD_PAWAN_KUMAR_TINU": "SAD_PAWAN_KUMAR_TINU", "INC_MOHINDER_SINGH_KAYPEE": "INC_MOHINDER_SINGH_KAYPEE", "AAAP_HANS_RAJ_RANA": "AAAP_HANS_RAJ_RANA", "BSP_SEWA_SINGH": "BSP_SEWA_SINGH", "CPM_GURDIAL_BAINS": "CPM_GURDIAL_BAINS", "SAD_M_NIRMAL_SINGH_BOLINA": "SAD_M_NIRMAL_SINGH_BOLINA", "BRPP_SURJIT_SINGH": "BRPP_SURJIT_SINGH", "JJJKP_MANJIT_KAUR": "JJJKP_MANJIT_KAUR", "INC_RAJNISH_KUMAR_BABBI": "INC_RAJNISH_KUMAR_BABBI", "BJP_ARUNESH_KUMAR": "BJP_ARUNESH_KUMAR", "Independent_039_MUKERIAN_1": "Independent_039_MUKERIAN_1", "AAAP_SULAKHAN_SINGH": "AAAP_SULAKHAN_SINGH", "BSP_KARAMJIT_SINGH": "BSP_KARAMJIT_SINGH", "SAD_M_GURVATAN_SINGH": "SAD_M_GURVATAN_SINGH", "RMPOI_DHARMINDER_SINGH": "RMPOI_DHARMINDER_SINGH", "APPA_RAJ_MAL": "APPA_RAJ_MAL", "SHS_SUMITRI_DEVI": "SHS_SUMITRI_DEVI", "BDPTY_BHAJAN_SINGH": "BDPTY_BHAJAN_SINGH", "HSS_KULDEEP_KUMAR": "HSS_KULDEEP_KUMAR", "INC_ARUN_DOGRA": "INC_ARUN_DOGRA", "BJP_SUKHJIT_KAUR": "BJP_SUKHJIT_KAUR", "AAAP_BALBIR_KAUR": "AAAP_BALBIR_KAUR", "Independent_040_DASUYA_1": "Independent_040_DASUYA_1", "BSP_JAGPREET_SINGH_SAHI": "BSP_JAGPREET_SINGH_SAHI", "Independent_040_DASUYA_2": "Independent_040_DASUYA_2", "Independent_040_DASUYA_3": "Independent_040_DASUYA_3", "APPA_LAWRENCE_CHAUDHARY": "APPA_LAWRENCE_CHAUDHARY", "CPI_SUKHA_SINGH": "CPI_SUKHA_SINGH", "DPIN_CHARANJIT_SINGH": "DPIN_CHARANJIT_SINGH", "HSS_SARBJIT_SINGH": "HSS_SARBJIT_SINGH", "SAPUNPA_MANJIT_SINGH": "SAPUNPA_MANJIT_SINGH", "INC_SANGAT_SINGH_GILZIAN": "INC_SANGAT_SINGH_GILZIAN", "SAD_ARBINDER_SINGH_RASULPUR": "SAD_ARBINDER_SINGH_RASULPUR", "AAAP_JASVIR_SINGH_GILL_RAJA": "AAAP_JASVIR_SINGH_GILL_RAJA", "BSP_GURBAKHASH_SINGH": "BSP_GURBAKHASH_SINGH", "SAD_M_KULDIP_SINGH": "SAD_M_KULDIP_SINGH", "HSS_VIKAS_JASRA": "HSS_VIKAS_JASRA", "APPA_VIRENDER_KUMAR": "APPA_VIRENDER_KUMAR", "BDPTY_GURDIAL_SINGH": "BDPTY_GURDIAL_SINGH", "DPIN_SUGRIV_SINGH": "DPIN_SUGRIV_SINGH", "INC_PAWAN_KUMAR_ADIA": "INC_PAWAN_KUMAR_ADIA", "AAAP_DR_RAVJOT_SINGH": "AAAP_DR_RAVJOT_SINGH", "SAD_MOHINDER_KAUR_JOSH": "SAD_MOHINDER_KAUR_JOSH", "BSP_BHAGWAN_DASS": "BSP_BHAGWAN_DASS", "APPA_SATISH_LAMBA": "APPA_SATISH_LAMBA", "BDPTY_KEWAL_LAL_HEER": "BDPTY_KEWAL_LAL_HEER", "INC_SUNDER_SHAM_ARORA": "INC_SUNDER_SHAM_ARORA", "BJP_TIKSHAN_SUD": "BJP_TIKSHAN_SUD", "AAAP_PARAMJIT_SINGH_SACHDEVA": "AAAP_PARAMJIT_SINGH_SACHDEVA", "BSP_SURINDER_KUMAR": "BSP_SURINDER_KUMAR", "APPA_MOHINDER_SINGH": "APPA_MOHINDER_SINGH", "DEMSWP_MANINDER_PAL": "DEMSWP_MANINDER_PAL", "Independent_043_HOSHIARPUR_1": "Independent_043_HOSHIARPUR_1", "BDPTY_AJIT_RAM": "BDPTY_AJIT_RAM", "Independent_043_HOSHIARPUR_2": "Independent_043_HOSHIARPUR_2", "HND_PARAMJIT_SINGH": "HND_PARAMJIT_SINGH", "DPIN_JASPREET_KAUR": "DPIN_JASPREET_KAUR", "INC_DR_RAJ_KUMAR": "INC_DR_RAJ_KUMAR", "SAD_SOHAN_SINGH_THANDAL": "SAD_SOHAN_SINGH_THANDAL", "AAAP_RAMAN_KUMAR": "AAAP_RAMAN_KUMAR", "BSP_GURLAL_SAILA": "BSP_GURLAL_SAILA", "Independent_044_CHABBEWAL_1": "Independent_044_CHABBEWAL_1", "BDPTY_GURNAM_SINGH": "BDPTY_GURNAM_SINGH", "IVD_SURINDER_SINGH": "IVD_SURINDER_SINGH", "SAD_M_JAGDISH_SINGH": "SAD_M_JAGDISH_SINGH", "APPA_GURJIT_SINGH": "APPA_GURJIT_SINGH", "AAAP_JAI_KRISHAN": "AAAP_JAI_KRISHAN", "SAD_SURINDER_SINGH_HEER": "SAD_SURINDER_SINGH_HEER", "INC_LOV_KUMAR_GOLDY": "INC_LOV_KUMAR_GOLDY", "BSP_BAKHSHISH_SINGH": "BSP_BAKHSHISH_SINGH", "CPM_HARBHAJAN_SINGH": "CPM_HARBHAJAN_SINGH", "APPA_SURJIT_SINGH_RANDHAWA": "APPA_SURJIT_SINGH_RANDHAWA", "Independent_045_GARHSHANKAR_1": "Independent_045_GARHSHANKAR_1", "SAD_M_PASHORA_SINGH": "SAD_M_PASHORA_SINGH", "AITC_MANJIT_SINGH": "AITC_MANJIT_SINGH", "Independent_045_GARHSHANKAR_2": "Independent_045_GARHSHANKAR_2", "BDPTY_BISHAN_DASS": "BDPTY_BISHAN_DASS", "Independent_045_GARHSHANKAR_3": "Independent_045_GARHSHANKAR_3", "SAD_SUKHWINDER_KUMAR": "SAD_SUKHWINDER_KUMAR", "AAAP_HARJOT": "AAAP_HARJOT", "INC_SATNAM_SINGH_KAINTH": "INC_SATNAM_SINGH_KAINTH", "BSP_RAJINDER_SINGH": "BSP_RAJINDER_SINGH", "Independent_046_BANGA_1": "Independent_046_BANGA_1", "CPI_PAUL_RAM": "CPI_PAUL_RAM", "APPA_SARABJIT_SINGH": "APPA_SARABJIT_SINGH", "INC_ANGAD_SINGH": "INC_ANGAD_SINGH", "SAD_JARNAIL_SINGH_WAHID": "SAD_JARNAIL_SINGH_WAHID", "AAAP_CHARANJIT_SINGH_CHANNI": "AAAP_CHARANJIT_SINGH_CHANNI", "BSP_DR_NACHHATAR_PAL": "BSP_DR_NACHHATAR_PAL", "CPM_HITESH_KUMAR_PATHAK": "CPM_HITESH_KUMAR_PATHAK", "Independent_047_NAWAN_SHAHR_1": "Independent_047_NAWAN_SHAHR_1", "Independent_047_NAWAN_SHAHR_2": "Independent_047_NAWAN_SHAHR_2", "APPA_ASHWANI_JOSHI": "APPA_ASHWANI_JOSHI", "Independent_047_NAWAN_SHAHR_3": "Independent_047_NAWAN_SHAHR_3", "INC_DARSHAN_LAL": "INC_DARSHAN_LAL", "SAD_NAND_LAL": "SAD_NAND_LAL", "BSP_BALJIT_SINGH": "BSP_BALJIT_SINGH", "CPM_PARMJIT_SINGH": "CPM_PARMJIT_SINGH", "APPA_JARNAIL_SINGH": "APPA_JARNAIL_SINGH", "Independent_048_BALACHAUR_1": "Independent_048_BALACHAUR_1", "Independent_048_BALACHAUR_2": "Independent_048_BALACHAUR_2", "Independent_048_BALACHAUR_3": "Independent_048_BALACHAUR_3", "Independent_048_BALACHAUR_4": "Independent_048_BALACHAUR_4", "INC_KANWAR_PAL_SINGH": "INC_KANWAR_PAL_SINGH", "BJP_DR_PARMINDER_SHARMA": "BJP_DR_PARMINDER_SHARMA", "AAAP_SANJEEV_GAUTAM": "AAAP_SANJEEV_GAUTAM", "Independent_049_ANANDPUR_SAHIB_1": "Independent_049_ANANDPUR_SAHIB_1", "BSP_GURCHARAN_SINGH_KHALSA": "BSP_GURCHARAN_SINGH_KHALSA", "CPM_MOHINDER_SINGH": "CPM_MOHINDER_SINGH", "Independent_049_ANANDPUR_SAHIB_2": "Independent_049_ANANDPUR_SAHIB_2", "PDEMP_SUBHASH_CHANDER_SHARMA": "PDEMP_SUBHASH_CHANDER_SHARMA", "SAD_M_HARBHJN_SINGH": "SAD_M_HARBHJN_SINGH", "AAAP_AMARJIT_SINGH_SANDOA": "AAAP_AMARJIT_SINGH_SANDOA", "INC_BRINDER_SINGH_DHILLON": "INC_BRINDER_SINGH_DHILLON", "SAD_DR_DALJIT_SINGH_CHEEMA": "SAD_DR_DALJIT_SINGH_CHEEMA", "BSP_MAKHAN_SINGH": "BSP_MAKHAN_SINGH", "CPI_B_S_SAINI": "CPI_B_S_SAINI", "DEMSWP_JORAWAR_SINGH": "DEMSWP_JORAWAR_SINGH", "Independent_050_RUPNAGAR_1": "Independent_050_RUPNAGAR_1", "INC_CHARANJIT_SINGH_CHANNI": "INC_CHARANJIT_SINGH_CHANNI", "AAAP_CHARANJIT_SINGH": "AAAP_CHARANJIT_SINGH", "SAD_JUSTICE_NIRMAL_SINGH": "SAD_JUSTICE_NIRMAL_SINGH", "PDEMP_HARJINDER_SINGH": "PDEMP_HARJINDER_SINGH", "Independent_051_CHAMKAUR_SAHIB_1": "Independent_051_CHAMKAUR_SAHIB_1", "APPA_PARMINDER_KAUR": "APPA_PARMINDER_KAUR", "JJJKP_SHINDERPAL_SINGH": "JJJKP_SHINDERPAL_SINGH", "AAAP_KANWAR_SANDHU": "AAAP_KANWAR_SANDHU", "INC_JAGMOHAN_SINGH_KANG": "INC_JAGMOHAN_SINGH_KANG", "SAD_RANJIT_SINGH_GILL": "SAD_RANJIT_SINGH_GILL", "BSP_HARBHAJAN_SINGH": "BSP_HARBHAJAN_SINGH", "SAD_M_JAGWINDER_SINGH": "SAD_M_JAGWINDER_SINGH", "APPA_SUDESH_KUMAR": "APPA_SUDESH_KUMAR", "Independent_052_KHARAR_1": "Independent_052_KHARAR_1", "Independent_052_KHARAR_2": "Independent_052_KHARAR_2", "PDEMP_GURJEET_SINGH": "PDEMP_GURJEET_SINGH", "JJJKP_SURJIT_SINGH": "JJJKP_SURJIT_SINGH", "INC_BALBIR_SINGH_SIDHU": "INC_BALBIR_SINGH_SIDHU", "AAAP_NARINDER_SINGH": "AAAP_NARINDER_SINGH", "SAD_TEJINDER_PAL_SINGH": "SAD_TEJINDER_PAL_SINGH", "BSP_SARBJIT_SINGH": "BSP_SARBJIT_SINGH", "HSS_AMIT_SHARMA": "HSS_AMIT_SHARMA", "Independent_053_S_A_S_NAGAR_1": "Independent_053_S_A_S_NAGAR_1", "AITC_JASWINDER_SINGH": "AITC_JASWINDER_SINGH", "Independent_053_S_A_S_NAGAR_2": "Independent_053_S_A_S_NAGAR_2", "PDEMP_GURKIRPAL_SINGH_MANN": "PDEMP_GURKIRPAL_SINGH_MANN", "APPA_MAHINDER_PAL_SINGH": "APPA_MAHINDER_PAL_SINGH", "Independent_053_S_A_S_NAGAR_3": "Independent_053_S_A_S_NAGAR_3", "Independent_053_S_A_S_NAGAR_4": "Independent_053_S_A_S_NAGAR_4", "BMUP_KISHOR_KUMAR_PAL": "BMUP_KISHOR_KUMAR_PAL", "BIRK_KRISHAN_GOPAL_SHARMA": "BIRK_KRISHAN_GOPAL_SHARMA", "INC_GURPREET_SINGH": "INC_GURPREET_SINGH", "AAAP_SANTOKH_SINGH": "AAAP_SANTOKH_SINGH", "SAD_DARBARA_SINGH_GURU": "SAD_DARBARA_SINGH_GURU", "SAD_M_DHARAM_SINGH": "SAD_M_DHARAM_SINGH", "Independent_054_BASSI_PATHANA_1": "Independent_054_BASSI_PATHANA_1", "Independent_054_BASSI_PATHANA_2": "Independent_054_BASSI_PATHANA_2", "SAKAP_SAMUNDER_SINGH": "SAKAP_SAMUNDER_SINGH", "APPA_MANJINDER_SINGH": "APPA_MANJINDER_SINGH", "INC_KULJIT_SINGH_NAGRA": "INC_KULJIT_SINGH_NAGRA", "SAD_DIDAR_SINGH_BHATTI": "SAD_DIDAR_SINGH_BHATTI", "AAAP_LAKHVIR_SINGH_RAI": "AAAP_LAKHVIR_SINGH_RAI", "APPA_TARLOCHAN_SINGH": "APPA_TARLOCHAN_SINGH", "INC_RANDEEP_SINGH": "INC_RANDEEP_SINGH", "SAD_GURPREET_SINGH_RAJU_KHANNA": "SAD_GURPREET_SINGH_RAJU_KHANNA", "AAAP_GURPREET_SINGH_BHATTI": "AAAP_GURPREET_SINGH_BHATTI", "Independent_056_AMLOH_1": "Independent_056_AMLOH_1", "SAD_M_LAKHVIR_SINGH": "SAD_M_LAKHVIR_SINGH", "BSP_RAM_SINGH": "BSP_RAM_SINGH", "Independent_056_AMLOH_2": "Independent_056_AMLOH_2", "Independent_056_AMLOH_3": "Independent_056_AMLOH_3", "HSS_SANJIV_KUMAR_PILOT": "HSS_SANJIV_KUMAR_PILOT", "Independent_056_AMLOH_4": "Independent_056_AMLOH_4", "JJJKP_GURJINDER_SINGH": "JJJKP_GURJINDER_SINGH", "INC_GURKIRAT_SINGH_KOTLI": "INC_GURKIRAT_SINGH_KOTLI", "AAAP_ANIL_DUTT_PHALLY": "AAAP_ANIL_DUTT_PHALLY", "SAD_RANJIT_SINGH_TALWANDI": "SAD_RANJIT_SINGH_TALWANDI", "BSP_SHASHI_VARDHAN": "BSP_SHASHI_VARDHAN", "APPA_VIJAY_DIAMOND": "APPA_VIJAY_DIAMOND", "SAD_M_RAJIV_VIJAN": "SAD_M_RAJIV_VIJAN", "Independent_057_KHANNA_1": "Independent_057_KHANNA_1", "SAPUNPA_DHARAMJIT_SINGH": "SAPUNPA_DHARAMJIT_SINGH", "Independent_057_KHANNA_2": "Independent_057_KHANNA_2", "RSP_BALJIT_SINGH_SANDHU": "RSP_BALJIT_SINGH_SANDHU", "INC_AMRIK_SINGH_DHILLON": "INC_AMRIK_SINGH_DHILLON", "AAAP_SARBANS_SINGH_MANKI": "AAAP_SARBANS_SINGH_MANKI", "SAD_SANTA_SINGH_UMAIDPUR": "SAD_SANTA_SINGH_UMAIDPUR", "SAD_M_SHINGARA_SINGH": "SAD_M_SHINGARA_SINGH", "BSP_DALVIR_SINGH": "BSP_DALVIR_SINGH", "APPA_BHUPINDER_SINGH": "APPA_BHUPINDER_SINGH", "DPI_MANOHAR_LAL": "DPI_MANOHAR_LAL", "SAKAP_DILBAG_SINGH": "SAKAP_DILBAG_SINGH", "RSP_ASHWANI_KUMAR_DHAND": "RSP_ASHWANI_KUMAR_DHAND", "SAD_SHARANJIT_SINGH_DHILLON": "SAD_SHARANJIT_SINGH_DHILLON", "INC_SATWINDER_KAUR_BITTI": "INC_SATWINDER_KAUR_BITTI", "AAAP_HARJOT_SINGH_BAINS": "AAAP_HARJOT_SINGH_BAINS", "Independent_059_SAHNEWAL_1": "Independent_059_SAHNEWAL_1", "SAD_M_MANBIR_SINGH_GREWAL": "SAD_M_MANBIR_SINGH_GREWAL", "JKNPP_SUSHIL_KUMAR": "JKNPP_SUSHIL_KUMAR", "Independent_059_SAHNEWAL_2": "Independent_059_SAHNEWAL_2", "SAPUNPA_JAGVIR_SINGH_JAGGI": "SAPUNPA_JAGVIR_SINGH_JAGGI", "Independent_059_SAHNEWAL_3": "Independent_059_SAHNEWAL_3", "HSS_NAGENDER_KUMAR": "HSS_NAGENDER_KUMAR", "BASD_RANDHIR_SINGH": "BASD_RANDHIR_SINGH", "INC_SANJEEV_TALWAR": "INC_SANJEEV_TALWAR", "AAAP_DALJIT_SINGH_GREWAL_BHOLA": "AAAP_DALJIT_SINGH_GREWAL_BHOLA", "SAD_RANJIT_SINGH_DHILLON": "SAD_RANJIT_SINGH_DHILLON", "BSP_GURPREET_SINGH": "BSP_GURPREET_SINGH", "SAD_M_JASWANT_SINGH_CHEEMA": "SAD_M_JASWANT_SINGH_CHEEMA", "AITC_HARDEEP_SINGH_BAWA": "AITC_HARDEEP_SINGH_BAWA", "Independent_060_LUDHIANA_EAST_1": "Independent_060_LUDHIANA_EAST_1", "LIP_BALVINDER_SINGH_BAINS": "LIP_BALVINDER_SINGH_BAINS", "INC_BHUPINDER_SINGH_SIDHU": "INC_BHUPINDER_SINGH_SIDHU", "SAD_HIRA_SINGH_GABRIA": "SAD_HIRA_SINGH_GABRIA", "BSP_CHARAN_SINGH": "BSP_CHARAN_SINGH", "Independent_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH_1": "Independent_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH_1", "Independent_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH_2": "Independent_061_LUDHIANA_SOUTH_2", "DEMSWP_KUNVAR_RANJAN_SINGH": "DEMSWP_KUNVAR_RANJAN_SINGH", "APPA_PARMINDER_SINGH_KUKI": "APPA_PARMINDER_SINGH_KUKI", "JJJKP_DARSHAN_SINGH_DABA": "JJJKP_DARSHAN_SINGH_DABA", "LIP_SIMARJEET_SINGH_BAINS": "LIP_SIMARJEET_SINGH_BAINS", "INC_KAMAL_JIT_SINGH_KARWAL": "INC_KAMAL_JIT_SINGH_KARWAL", "SAD_GURMEET_SINGH_KULAR": "SAD_GURMEET_SINGH_KULAR", "SAKAP_AVTAR_SINGH": "SAKAP_AVTAR_SINGH", "SWAP_RAVI_KUMAR_VAID": "SWAP_RAVI_KUMAR_VAID", "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_1": "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_1", "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_2": "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_2", "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_3": "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_3", "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_4": "Independent_062_ATAM_NAGAR_4", "NCP_DEEPAK": "NCP_DEEPAK", "INC_SURINDER_KUMAR_DAWAR": "INC_SURINDER_KUMAR_DAWAR", "BJP_GURDEV_SHARMA_DEBI": "BJP_GURDEV_SHARMA_DEBI", "LIP_VIPAN_SOOD_KAKA": "LIP_VIPAN_SOOD_KAKA", "AITC_SUSHIL_KUMAR": "AITC_SUSHIL_KUMAR", "DEMSWP_RAJEEV_KUMAR": "DEMSWP_RAJEEV_KUMAR", "BSP_AKHLESH_SINGH": "BSP_AKHLESH_SINGH", "INC_BHARAT_BHUSHAN_ASHU": "INC_BHARAT_BHUSHAN_ASHU", "AAAP_AHBAAB_SINGH_GREWAL": "AAAP_AHBAAB_SINGH_GREWAL", "BJP_KAMAL_CHATLY": "BJP_KAMAL_CHATLY", "BSP_KUNAL": "BSP_KUNAL", "NCP_ARUN_KUMAR": "NCP_ARUN_KUMAR", "RPI_A_JAGROOP_SINGH_KARARA": "RPI_A_JAGROOP_SINGH_KARARA", "Independent_064_LUDHIANA_WEST_1": "Independent_064_LUDHIANA_WEST_1", "Independent_064_LUDHIANA_WEST_2": "Independent_064_LUDHIANA_WEST_2", "Independent_064_LUDHIANA_WEST_3": "Independent_064_LUDHIANA_WEST_3", "APPA_BALKAUR_SINGH_GILL": "APPA_BALKAUR_SINGH_GILL", "Independent_064_LUDHIANA_WEST_4": "Independent_064_LUDHIANA_WEST_4", "LPSP_RAM_KUMAR": "LPSP_RAM_KUMAR", "SWAP_MANDEEP_SINGH_DHALIWAL": "SWAP_MANDEEP_SINGH_DHALIWAL", "BMUP_VAID_RAM_SINGH_DEEPAK": "BMUP_VAID_RAM_SINGH_DEEPAK", "INC_RAKESH_PANDEY": "INC_RAKESH_PANDEY", "BJP_PARVEEN_BANSAL": "BJP_PARVEEN_BANSAL", "LIP_RANDHIR_SINGH_SIVIA": "LIP_RANDHIR_SINGH_SIVIA", "Independent_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH_1": "Independent_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH_1", "Independent_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH_2": "Independent_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH_2", "BSP_RAJINDER_KUMAR": "BSP_RAJINDER_KUMAR", "Independent_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH_3": "Independent_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH_3", "JKNPP_JEET_SHARMA": "JKNPP_JEET_SHARMA", "Independent_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH_4": "Independent_065_LUDHIANA_NORTH_4", "SHS_PREM_BHUSHAN_JAIN": "SHS_PREM_BHUSHAN_JAIN", "BMUP_JOGINDER_LAL": "BMUP_JOGINDER_LAL", "INC_KULDEEP_SINGH_VAID_BULARA": "INC_KULDEEP_SINGH_VAID_BULARA", "AAAP_JIWAN_SINGH_SANGOWAL": "AAAP_JIWAN_SINGH_SANGOWAL", "SAD_DARSHAN_SINGH_SHIVALIK": "SAD_DARSHAN_SINGH_SHIVALIK", "BSP_BIKKER_SINGH": "BSP_BIKKER_SINGH", "Independent_066_GILL_1": "Independent_066_GILL_1", "Independent_066_GILL_2": "Independent_066_GILL_2", "Independent_066_GILL_3": "Independent_066_GILL_3", "APPA_SUKHPREET_SINGH": "APPA_SUKHPREET_SINGH", "BMUP_HARBANS_SINGH": "BMUP_HARBANS_SINGH", "Independent_066_GILL_4": "Independent_066_GILL_4", "INC_LAKHVIR_SINGH_LAKHA": "INC_LAKHVIR_SINGH_LAKHA", "AAAP_GURPREET_SINGH_LAPRAN": "AAAP_GURPREET_SINGH_LAPRAN", "SAD_ISHER_SINGH_MEHARBAN": "SAD_ISHER_SINGH_MEHARBAN", "SAD_M_GURVINDER_SINGH": "SAD_M_GURVINDER_SINGH", "BSP_DALBARA_SINGH": "BSP_DALBARA_SINGH", "DEMSWP_ADVOCATE_INDERJIT_SINGH": "DEMSWP_ADVOCATE_INDERJIT_SINGH", "Independent_067_PAYAL_1": "Independent_067_PAYAL_1", "APPA_CAPTAIN_RAMPAL_SINGH": "APPA_CAPTAIN_RAMPAL_SINGH", "AITC_SANDEEP_SINGH": "AITC_SANDEEP_SINGH", "Independent_067_PAYAL_2": "Independent_067_PAYAL_2", "Independent_067_PAYAL_3": "Independent_067_PAYAL_3", "NCP_KULWANT_SINGH_CHEEMA": "NCP_KULWANT_SINGH_CHEEMA", "Independent_067_PAYAL_4": "Independent_067_PAYAL_4", "AAAP_HARVINDER_SINGH_PHOOLKA": "AAAP_HARVINDER_SINGH_PHOOLKA", "SAD_MANPREET_SINGH_AYALI": "SAD_MANPREET_SINGH_AYALI", "INC_MAJOR_SINGH_BHAINI": "INC_MAJOR_SINGH_BHAINI", "DEMSWP_TARSEM_JODHAN": "DEMSWP_TARSEM_JODHAN", "BSP_JASWINDER_SINGH": "BSP_JASWINDER_SINGH", "Independent_068_DAKHA_1": "Independent_068_DAKHA_1", "SAD_M_JOGINDER_SINGH": "SAD_M_JOGINDER_SINGH", "JKNPP_GURSHARAN_SINGH_JASSAL": "JKNPP_GURSHARAN_SINGH_JASSAL", "AAAP_JAGTAR_SINGH_JAGGA_HISSOWAL": "AAAP_JAGTAR_SINGH_JAGGA_HISSOWAL", "INC_AMAR_SINGH": "INC_AMAR_SINGH", "SAD_INDER_IQBAL_SINGH_ATWAL": "SAD_INDER_IQBAL_SINGH_ATWAL", "BSP_SURINDER_SINGH": "BSP_SURINDER_SINGH", "CPM_MOTA_SINGH": "CPM_MOTA_SINGH", "Independent_069_RAIKOT_1": "Independent_069_RAIKOT_1", "BMUP_SIKANDAR_SINGH": "BMUP_SIKANDAR_SINGH", "AAAP_SARAVJIT_KAUR_MANUKE": "AAAP_SARAVJIT_KAUR_MANUKE", "INC_MALKIT_SINGH_DAKHA": "INC_MALKIT_SINGH_DAKHA", "SAD_AMARJIT_KAUR_SAHOKE": "SAD_AMARJIT_KAUR_SAHOKE", "Independent_070_JAGRAON_1": "Independent_070_JAGRAON_1", "BSP_SUBEDAR_SADHU_SINGH_TAPPAR": "BSP_SUBEDAR_SADHU_SINGH_TAPPAR", "CPM_BALJIT_SINGH": "CPM_BALJIT_SINGH", "Independent_070_JAGRAON_2": "Independent_070_JAGRAON_2", "APPA_JASVIR_SINGH": "APPA_JASVIR_SINGH", "Independent_070_JAGRAON_3": "Independent_070_JAGRAON_3", "AAAP_MANJIT_SINGH": "AAAP_MANJIT_SINGH", "INC_RAJWINDER_KAUR": "INC_RAJWINDER_KAUR", "SAD_S_R_KALER": "SAD_S_R_KALER", "CPI_MOHINDER_SINGH": "CPI_MOHINDER_SINGH", "SAD_M_KUBDEEP_SINGH": "SAD_M_KUBDEEP_SINGH", "BSP_KEWAL_SINGH": "BSP_KEWAL_SINGH", "Independent_071_NIHAL_SINGH_WALA_1": "Independent_071_NIHAL_SINGH_WALA_1", "Independent_071_NIHAL_SINGH_WALA_2": "Independent_071_NIHAL_SINGH_WALA_2", "DEMSWP_JARMANJIT_SINGH": "DEMSWP_JARMANJIT_SINGH", "Independent_071_NIHAL_SINGH_WALA_3": "Independent_071_NIHAL_SINGH_WALA_3", "Independent_071_NIHAL_SINGH_WALA_4": "Independent_071_NIHAL_SINGH_WALA_4", "INC_DARSHAN_SINGH_BRAR": "INC_DARSHAN_SINGH_BRAR", "AAAP_GURBINDER_SINGH_KANG": "AAAP_GURBINDER_SINGH_KANG", "SAD_TIRATH_SINGH_MAHLA": "SAD_TIRATH_SINGH_MAHLA", "Independent_072_BHAGHA_PURANA_1": "Independent_072_BHAGHA_PURANA_1", "BSP_MANDER_SINGH": "BSP_MANDER_SINGH", "NAIP_NIRMAL_SINGH": "NAIP_NIRMAL_SINGH", "OP_SUKHDEV_RAJ": "OP_SUKHDEV_RAJ", "INC_HARJOT_KAMAL_SINGH": "INC_HARJOT_KAMAL_SINGH", "AAAP_RAMESH_GROVER": "AAAP_RAMESH_GROVER", "SAD_BARJINDER_SINGH_MAKHAN_BRAR": "SAD_BARJINDER_SINGH_MAKHAN_BRAR", "Independent_073_MOGA_1": "Independent_073_MOGA_1", "BSP_KULWANT_SINGH": "BSP_KULWANT_SINGH", "AITC_SANDHURA_SINGH_DAULATPURA": "AITC_SANDHURA_SINGH_DAULATPURA", "SHS_AMAR_KUMAR": "SHS_AMAR_KUMAR", "Independent_073_MOGA_2": "Independent_073_MOGA_2", "Independent_073_MOGA_3": "Independent_073_MOGA_3", "Independent_073_MOGA_4": "Independent_073_MOGA_4", "HSS_SHRIRAM_DANWAL": "HSS_SHRIRAM_DANWAL", "Independent_073_MOGA_5": "Independent_073_MOGA_5", "INC_SUKHJIT_SINGH": "INC_SUKHJIT_SINGH", "SAD_TOTA_SINGH": "SAD_TOTA_SINGH", "AAAP_DALJIT_SINGH": "AAAP_DALJIT_SINGH", "CPI_SURAT_SINGH": "CPI_SURAT_SINGH", "SAD_M_BALRAJ_SINGH": "SAD_M_BALRAJ_SINGH", "BSP_JAGGA_SINGH": "BSP_JAGGA_SINGH", "Independent_074_DHARAMKOT_1": "Independent_074_DHARAMKOT_1", "IKL_BALJIT_SINGH": "IKL_BALJIT_SINGH", "APPA_SUKHPAL_SINGH": "APPA_SUKHPAL_SINGH", "Independent_074_DHARAMKOT_2": "Independent_074_DHARAMKOT_2", "BMUP_GURDEEP_SINGH": "BMUP_GURDEEP_SINGH", "INC_KULBIR_SINGH": "INC_KULBIR_SINGH", "SAD_HARI_SINGH_ZIRA": "SAD_HARI_SINGH_ZIRA", "AAAP_GURPREET_SINGH": "AAAP_GURPREET_SINGH", "SHS_STEPHEN_BHATTI": "SHS_STEPHEN_BHATTI", "BSP_SUKHWINDER_SINGH": "BSP_SUKHWINDER_SINGH", "Independent_075_ZIRA_1": "Independent_075_ZIRA_1", "Independent_075_ZIRA_2": "Independent_075_ZIRA_2", "Independent_075_ZIRA_3": "Independent_075_ZIRA_3", "Independent_075_ZIRA_4": "Independent_075_ZIRA_4", "Independent_075_ZIRA_5": "Independent_075_ZIRA_5", "Independent_075_ZIRA_6": "Independent_075_ZIRA_6", "Independent_075_ZIRA_7": "Independent_075_ZIRA_7", "INC_PARMINDER_SINGH_PINKI": "INC_PARMINDER_SINGH_PINKI", "BJP_SUKHPAL_SINGH": "BJP_SUKHPAL_SINGH", "BSP_RAKESH": "BSP_RAKESH", "SAD_M_TEJINDER_SINGH": "SAD_M_TEJINDER_SINGH", "Independent_076_FIROZPUR_CITY_1": "Independent_076_FIROZPUR_CITY_1", "SHS_MUKESH_KUMAR": "SHS_MUKESH_KUMAR", "Independent_076_FIROZPUR_CITY_2": "Independent_076_FIROZPUR_CITY_2", "Independent_076_FIROZPUR_CITY_3": "Independent_076_FIROZPUR_CITY_3", "Independent_076_FIROZPUR_CITY_4": "Independent_076_FIROZPUR_CITY_4", "Independent_076_FIROZPUR_CITY_5": "Independent_076_FIROZPUR_CITY_5", "INC_SATKAR_KAUR": "INC_SATKAR_KAUR", "SAD_JOGINDER_SINGH_JINDU": "SAD_JOGINDER_SINGH_JINDU", "AAAP_MOHAN_SINGH_PHALLIAN_WALA": "AAAP_MOHAN_SINGH_PHALLIAN_WALA", "Independent_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL_1": "Independent_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL_1", "BSP_PURAN": "BSP_PURAN", "SAD_M_LAL_SINGH_SULHANI": "SAD_M_LAL_SINGH_SULHANI", "Independent_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL_2": "Independent_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL_2", "SWAP_BADAL_SINGH": "SWAP_BADAL_SINGH", "Independent_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL_3": "Independent_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL_3", "Independent_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL_4": "Independent_077_FIROZPUR_RURAL_4", "INC_GURMEET_SINGH_SODHI": "INC_GURMEET_SINGH_SODHI", "SAD_VARDEV_SINGH": "SAD_VARDEV_SINGH", "AAAP_MALKIT_CHAND": "AAAP_MALKIT_CHAND", "BSP_GURMUKH_SINGH": "BSP_GURMUKH_SINGH", "SAD_M_IQBAL_SINGH": "SAD_M_IQBAL_SINGH", "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_1": "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_1", "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_2": "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_2", "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_3": "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_3", "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_4": "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_4", "IKL_HARBHAJAN_SINGH": "IKL_HARBHAJAN_SINGH", "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_5": "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_5", "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_6": "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_6", "APPA_RAJ_KUMAR": "APPA_RAJ_KUMAR", "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_7": "Independent_078_GURU_HAR_SAHAI_7", "SAPUNPA_KULWANT_SINGH": "SAPUNPA_KULWANT_SINGH", "SAD_SUKHBIR_SINGH_BADAL": "SAD_SUKHBIR_SINGH_BADAL", "AAAP_BHAGWANT_MANN": "AAAP_BHAGWANT_MANN", "INC_RAVNEET_SINGH_BITTU": "INC_RAVNEET_SINGH_BITTU", "CPI_SURINDER_SINGH": "CPI_SURINDER_SINGH", "Independent_079_JALALABAD_1": "Independent_079_JALALABAD_1", "BSP_MALKIT_SINGH": "BSP_MALKIT_SINGH", "APPA_BAKHSHISH_SINGH": "APPA_BAKHSHISH_SINGH", "Independent_079_JALALABAD_2": "Independent_079_JALALABAD_2", "SAD_M_GURMIT_SINGH": "SAD_M_GURMIT_SINGH", "Independent_079_JALALABAD_3": "Independent_079_JALALABAD_3", "Independent_079_JALALABAD_4": "Independent_079_JALALABAD_4", "INC_DAVINDER_SINGH_GHUBAYA": "INC_DAVINDER_SINGH_GHUBAYA", "BJP_SURJIT_KUMAR_JYANI": "BJP_SURJIT_KUMAR_JYANI", "Independent_080_FAZILKA_1": "Independent_080_FAZILKA_1", "AAAP_SAMARBIR_SINGH_SIDHU": "AAAP_SAMARBIR_SINGH_SIDHU", "APPA_KIRTI_CHOUDHARY": "APPA_KIRTI_CHOUDHARY", "Independent_080_FAZILKA_2": "Independent_080_FAZILKA_2", "Independent_080_FAZILKA_3": "Independent_080_FAZILKA_3", "BSP_HARJEET_SINGH": "BSP_HARJEET_SINGH", "Independent_080_FAZILKA_4": "Independent_080_FAZILKA_4", "Independent_080_FAZILKA_5": "Independent_080_FAZILKA_5", "Independent_080_FAZILKA_6": "Independent_080_FAZILKA_6", "IKL_GURJINDER_SINGH": "IKL_GURJINDER_SINGH", "SAD_M_MAKHAN_SINGH": "SAD_M_MAKHAN_SINGH", "Independent_080_FAZILKA_7": "Independent_080_FAZILKA_7", "Independent_080_FAZILKA_8": "Independent_080_FAZILKA_8", "BJP_ARUN_NARANG": "BJP_ARUN_NARANG", "INC_SUNIL_JAKHAR": "INC_SUNIL_JAKHAR", "AAAP_ATUL_NAGPAL": "AAAP_ATUL_NAGPAL", "BSP_PRITHI_RAJ": "BSP_PRITHI_RAJ", "Independent_081_ABOHAR_1": "Independent_081_ABOHAR_1", "Independent_081_ABOHAR_2": "Independent_081_ABOHAR_2", "RMPOI_RAM_KUMAR": "RMPOI_RAM_KUMAR", "Independent_081_ABOHAR_3": "Independent_081_ABOHAR_3", "Independent_081_ABOHAR_4": "Independent_081_ABOHAR_4", "Independent_081_ABOHAR_5": "Independent_081_ABOHAR_5", "Independent_081_ABOHAR_6": "Independent_081_ABOHAR_6", "INC_NATHU_RAM": "INC_NATHU_RAM", "SAD_PARKASH_SINGH_BHATTI": "SAD_PARKASH_SINGH_BHATTI", "AAAP_SIMARJEET_SINGH": "AAAP_SIMARJEET_SINGH", "AITC_GIRI_RAJ_RAJORA": "AITC_GIRI_RAJ_RAJORA", "BSP_SATISH_KUMAR": "BSP_SATISH_KUMAR", "Independent_082_BALLUANA_1": "Independent_082_BALLUANA_1", "NAIP_GURMAIL_SINGH": "NAIP_GURMAIL_SINGH", "SAD_PARKASH_SINGH": "SAD_PARKASH_SINGH", "INC_AMARINDER_SINGH": "INC_AMARINDER_SINGH", "AAAP_JARNAIL_SINGH": "AAAP_JARNAIL_SINGH", "PLP_GURMEET_SINGH_RANGHRETA": "PLP_GURMEET_SINGH_RANGHRETA", "SAD_M_BALJINDER_SINGH": "SAD_M_BALJINDER_SINGH", "APPA_MANMANDER_SINGH": "APPA_MANMANDER_SINGH", "INC_AMRINDER_SINGH_RAJA_WARRING": "INC_AMRINDER_SINGH_RAJA_WARRING", "SAD_HARDEEP_SINGH_DIMPY_DHILLON": "SAD_HARDEEP_SINGH_DIMPY_DHILLON", "AAAP_JAGDEEP_SINGH": "AAAP_JAGDEEP_SINGH", "CPI_JAGRUP_SINGH": "CPI_JAGRUP_SINGH", "BSP_SHEELA_RANI": "BSP_SHEELA_RANI", "Independent_084_GIDDERBAHA_1": "Independent_084_GIDDERBAHA_1", "NAIP_TEK_SINGH": "NAIP_TEK_SINGH", "INC_AJAIB_SINGH_BHATTI": "INC_AJAIB_SINGH_BHATTI", "SAD_DARSHAN_SINGH": "SAD_DARSHAN_SINGH", "AAAP_PRINCIPAL_BALDEV_SINGH": "AAAP_PRINCIPAL_BALDEV_SINGH", "CPI_GURTEJ_SINGH": "CPI_GURTEJ_SINGH", "BSP_SUKHDEV_SINGH": "BSP_SUKHDEV_SINGH", "Independent_085_MALOUT_1": "Independent_085_MALOUT_1", "Independent_085_MALOUT_2": "Independent_085_MALOUT_2", "SAD_KANWARJIT_SINGH": "SAD_KANWARJIT_SINGH", "INC_KARAN_KAUR": "INC_KARAN_KAUR", "AAAP_JAGDEEP_SINGH_KAKA_BRAR": "AAAP_JAGDEEP_SINGH_KAKA_BRAR", "Independent_086_MUKTSAR_1": "Independent_086_MUKTSAR_1", "BSP_ASHOK_KUMAR": "BSP_ASHOK_KUMAR", "Independent_086_MUKTSAR_2": "Independent_086_MUKTSAR_2", "RMPOI_HARJIT_SINGH": "RMPOI_HARJIT_SINGH", "Independent_086_MUKTSAR_3": "Independent_086_MUKTSAR_3", "Independent_086_MUKTSAR_4": "Independent_086_MUKTSAR_4", "APPA_RAJESH_GARG": "APPA_RAJESH_GARG", "INC_KUSALDEEP_SINGH_KIKI_DHILLON": "INC_KUSALDEEP_SINGH_KIKI_DHILLON", "AAAP_GURDIT_SINGH_SEKHON": "AAAP_GURDIT_SINGH_SEKHON", "SAD_PARAMBANS_SINGH_BUNTY_ROMANA": "SAD_PARAMBANS_SINGH_BUNTY_ROMANA", "BSP_GURBAX_SINGH_CHAUHAN": "BSP_GURBAX_SINGH_CHAUHAN", "APPA_HARDIP_SINGH_KINGRA": "APPA_HARDIP_SINGH_KINGRA", "Independent_087_FARIDKOT_1": "Independent_087_FARIDKOT_1", "DEMSWP_RAVINDER_PAL_KAUR": "DEMSWP_RAVINDER_PAL_KAUR", "Independent_087_FARIDKOT_2": "Independent_087_FARIDKOT_2", "Independent_087_FARIDKOT_3": "Independent_087_FARIDKOT_3", "AAAP_KULTAR_SINGH_SANDHWAN": "AAAP_KULTAR_SINGH_SANDHWAN", "INC_BHAI_HARNIRPAL_SINGH_KUKKU": "INC_BHAI_HARNIRPAL_SINGH_KUKKU", "SAD_MANTAR_SINGH_BRAR": "SAD_MANTAR_SINGH_BRAR", "BSP_AVTAR_KRISHAN": "BSP_AVTAR_KRISHAN", "Independent_088_KOTKAPURA_1": "Independent_088_KOTKAPURA_1", "APPA_SURINDER_KUMAR_DWIVEDI": "APPA_SURINDER_KUMAR_DWIVEDI", "NAIP_JAGROOP_SINGH": "NAIP_JAGROOP_SINGH", "Independent_088_KOTKAPURA_2": "Independent_088_KOTKAPURA_2", "AAAP_BALDEV_SINGH": "AAAP_BALDEV_SINGH", "INC_MOHAMMAD_SADIQUE": "INC_MOHAMMAD_SADIQUE", "SAD_MANJIT_SINGH_SUBA_SINGH": "SAD_MANJIT_SINGH_SUBA_SINGH", "CPI_BALVIR_SINGH": "CPI_BALVIR_SINGH", "BSP_KIKAR_SINGH": "BSP_KIKAR_SINGH", "SAD_M_GURDEEP_SINGH": "SAD_M_GURDEEP_SINGH", "APPA_HARPAL_SINGH": "APPA_HARPAL_SINGH", "AITC_AVTAR_SINGH_SAHOTA": "AITC_AVTAR_SINGH_SAHOTA", "Independent_089_JAITU_1": "Independent_089_JAITU_1", "RPI_A_PYARA_SINGH": "RPI_A_PYARA_SINGH", "Independent_089_JAITU_2": "Independent_089_JAITU_2", "INC_GURPREET_SINGH_KANGAR": "INC_GURPREET_SINGH_KANGAR", "SAD_SIKANDER_SINGH_MALUKA": "SAD_SIKANDER_SINGH_MALUKA", "AAAP_MANJIT_SINGH_SIDHU": "AAAP_MANJIT_SINGH_SIDHU", "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_1": "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_1", "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_2": "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_2", "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_3": "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_3", "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_4": "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_4", "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_5": "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_5", "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_6": "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_6", "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_7": "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_7", "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_8": "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_8", "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_9": "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_9", "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_10": "Independent_090_RAMPURA_PHUL_10", "INC_PRITAM_SINGH_KOTBHAI": "INC_PRITAM_SINGH_KOTBHAI", "AAAP_JAGSIR_SINGH": "AAAP_JAGSIR_SINGH", "SAD_HARPREET_SINGH": "SAD_HARPREET_SINGH", "Independent_091_BHUCHO_MANDI_1": "Independent_091_BHUCHO_MANDI_1", "BSP_MUMTAJ": "BSP_MUMTAJ", "AITC_SURINDER_PAL_SOMI_TUNGWALIA": "AITC_SURINDER_PAL_SOMI_TUNGWALIA", "Independent_091_BHUCHO_MANDI_2": "Independent_091_BHUCHO_MANDI_2", "INC_MANPREET_SINGH_BADAL": "INC_MANPREET_SINGH_BADAL", "AAAP_DEEPAK_BANSAL": "AAAP_DEEPAK_BANSAL", "SAD_SARUP_CHAND_SINGLA": "SAD_SARUP_CHAND_SINGLA", "BSP_SURESH_KUMAR": "BSP_SURESH_KUMAR", "Independent_092_BATHINDA_URBAN_1": "Independent_092_BATHINDA_URBAN_1", "SHS_PARVEEN_HITESHI": "SHS_PARVEEN_HITESHI", "BMUP_SANT_LAL": "BMUP_SANT_LAL", "Independent_092_BATHINDA_URBAN_2": "Independent_092_BATHINDA_URBAN_2", "APPA_JATINDER_ROY_KHATTAR": "APPA_JATINDER_ROY_KHATTAR", "DEMSWP_GIAN_CHAND_BANSAL": "DEMSWP_GIAN_CHAND_BANSAL", "HSS_SUKHCHAIN_SINGH": "HSS_SUKHCHAIN_SINGH", "SAD_M_HARVINDER_SINGH_HARRY": "SAD_M_HARVINDER_SINGH_HARRY", "JJJKP_HARDEEP_KUMAR_SHARMA": "JJJKP_HARDEEP_KUMAR_SHARMA", "AAAP_RUPINDER_KAUR_RUBY": "AAAP_RUPINDER_KAUR_RUBY", "SAD_ER_AMIT_RATTAN_KOTFATTA": "SAD_ER_AMIT_RATTAN_KOTFATTA", "INC_HARVINDER_SINGH_LADDI": "INC_HARVINDER_SINGH_LADDI", "BSP_DAVINDERPAL_SINGH": "BSP_DAVINDERPAL_SINGH", "Independent_093_BATHINDA_RURAL_1": "Independent_093_BATHINDA_RURAL_1", "CPI_SURJEET_SINGH_SOHI": "CPI_SURJEET_SINGH_SOHI", "APPA_JASWINDER_SINGH_GILL": "APPA_JASWINDER_SINGH_GILL", "AITC_JAGTAR_SINGH": "AITC_JAGTAR_SINGH", "Independent_093_BATHINDA_RURAL_2": "Independent_093_BATHINDA_RURAL_2", "AAAP_PROF_BALJINDER_KAUR": "AAAP_PROF_BALJINDER_KAUR", "INC_KHUSHBAZ_SINGH_JATANA": "INC_KHUSHBAZ_SINGH_JATANA", "SAD_JEETMOHINDER_SINGH_SIDHU": "SAD_JEETMOHINDER_SINGH_SIDHU", "BSP_HARJINDER_SINGH_MITHAN": "BSP_HARJINDER_SINGH_MITHAN", "Independent_094_TALWANDI_SABO_1": "Independent_094_TALWANDI_SABO_1", "SAD_M_AVTAR_SINGH_CHOPRA": "SAD_M_AVTAR_SINGH_CHOPRA", "Independent_094_TALWANDI_SABO_2": "Independent_094_TALWANDI_SABO_2", "Independent_094_TALWANDI_SABO_3": "Independent_094_TALWANDI_SABO_3", "APPA_VARINDER_SINGH_DHILLON": "APPA_VARINDER_SINGH_DHILLON", "AAAP_JAGDEV_SINGH": "AAAP_JAGDEV_SINGH", "SAD_JANMEJA_SINGH_SEKHON": "SAD_JANMEJA_SINGH_SEKHON", "INC_HARMINDER_SINGH_JASSI": "INC_HARMINDER_SINGH_JASSI", "Independent_095_MAUR_1": "Independent_095_MAUR_1", "CPI_ML_L_HARVINDER_SINGH": "CPI_ML_L_HARVINDER_SINGH", "AITC_TARANPAL_SINGH_DHILLON": "AITC_TARANPAL_SINGH_DHILLON", "BSP_DUSAHIRA_SINGH": "BSP_DUSAHIRA_SINGH", "AAAP_NAZAR_SINGH_MANSHAHIA": "AAAP_NAZAR_SINGH_MANSHAHIA", "INC_MANOJ_BALA": "INC_MANOJ_BALA", "SAD_JAGDEEP_SINGH_NAKAI": "SAD_JAGDEEP_SINGH_NAKAI", "CPI_ML_L_RANJIT_SINGH_TAMKOT": "CPI_ML_L_RANJIT_SINGH_TAMKOT", "SAD_M_JASKARAN_SINGH_KAHAN_SINGH_WALA": "SAD_M_JASKARAN_SINGH_KAHAN_SINGH_WALA", "BSP_BHUPINDER_SINGH_BIRVAL": "BSP_BHUPINDER_SINGH_BIRVAL", "Independent_096_MANSA_1": "Independent_096_MANSA_1", "APPA_MANGU_SINGH": "APPA_MANGU_SINGH", "SAD_DILRAJ_SINGH": "SAD_DILRAJ_SINGH", "INC_AJIT_INDER_SINGH": "INC_AJIT_INDER_SINGH", "AAAP_SUKHWINDER_SINGH_BHOLA_MANN": "AAAP_SUKHWINDER_SINGH_BHOLA_MANN", "BSP_JASVEER_SINGH": "BSP_JASVEER_SINGH", "CPI_ML_L_SURJIT_SINGH": "CPI_ML_L_SURJIT_SINGH", "RMPOI_LAL_CHAND": "RMPOI_LAL_CHAND", "AITC_PARMINDER_SINGH": "AITC_PARMINDER_SINGH", "APPA_JASWANT_SINGH": "APPA_JASWANT_SINGH", "SAD_M_RAJINDER_SINGH": "SAD_M_RAJINDER_SINGH", "AAAP_BUDH_RAM": "AAAP_BUDH_RAM", "INC_RANJIT_KAUR_BHATTI": "INC_RANJIT_KAUR_BHATTI", "SAD_NISHAN_SINGH": "SAD_NISHAN_SINGH", "CPI_KRISHAN_SINGH": "CPI_KRISHAN_SINGH", "CPI_ML_L_BHAGWANT_SINGH_SAMAO": "CPI_ML_L_BHAGWANT_SINGH_SAMAO", "SAD_M_RANJIT_SINGH": "SAD_M_RANJIT_SINGH", "BSP_SHER_SINGH": "BSP_SHER_SINGH", "Independent_098_BUDHLADA_1": "Independent_098_BUDHLADA_1", "APPA_KIRPAL_SINGH": "APPA_KIRPAL_SINGH", "AITC_LACHHMAN_SINGH_MAL_SINGH_WALA": "AITC_LACHHMAN_SINGH_MAL_SINGH_WALA", "SAD_PARMINDER_SINGH_DHINDSA": "SAD_PARMINDER_SINGH_DHINDSA", "INC_RAJINDER_KAUR_BHATTAL": "INC_RAJINDER_KAUR_BHATTAL", "AAAP_JASVIR_SINGH": "AAAP_JASVIR_SINGH", "BSP_RAM_DASS": "BSP_RAM_DASS", "Independent_099_LEHRA_1": "Independent_099_LEHRA_1", "CPI_SATWANT_SINGH": "CPI_SATWANT_SINGH", "DEMSWP_RAJ_KUMAR": "DEMSWP_RAJ_KUMAR", "Independent_099_LEHRA_2": "Independent_099_LEHRA_2", "SAD_M_GIAN_SINGH": "SAD_M_GIAN_SINGH", "AAAP_HARPAL_SINGH_CHEEMA": "AAAP_HARPAL_SINGH_CHEEMA", "INC_AJAIB_SINGH_RATOLAN": "INC_AJAIB_SINGH_RATOLAN", "SAD_GULZAR_SINGH": "SAD_GULZAR_SINGH", "Independent_100_DIRBA_1": "Independent_100_DIRBA_1", "BSP_HARWINDER_SINGH": "BSP_HARWINDER_SINGH", "SAD_M_MANDEEP_SINGH": "SAD_M_MANDEEP_SINGH", "CPI_ML_L_GHAMAND_SINGH": "CPI_ML_L_GHAMAND_SINGH", "Independent_100_DIRBA_2": "Independent_100_DIRBA_2", "APPA_JAGTAR_SINGH": "APPA_JAGTAR_SINGH", "AAAP_AMAN_ARORA": "AAAP_AMAN_ARORA", "SAD_GOBIND_SINGH_LONGOWAL": "SAD_GOBIND_SINGH_LONGOWAL", "INC_DAAMAN_THIND_BAJWA": "INC_DAAMAN_THIND_BAJWA", "Independent_101_SUNAM_1": "Independent_101_SUNAM_1", "SAD_M_SAHBAJ_SINGH_DASKA": "SAD_M_SAHBAJ_SINGH_DASKA", "Independent_101_SUNAM_2": "Independent_101_SUNAM_2", "CPM_JARNAIL_SINGH": "CPM_JARNAIL_SINGH", "Independent_101_SUNAM_3": "Independent_101_SUNAM_3", "Independent_101_SUNAM_4": "Independent_101_SUNAM_4", "Independent_101_SUNAM_5": "Independent_101_SUNAM_5", "APPA_RANDHIR_SINGH": "APPA_RANDHIR_SINGH", "AAAP_PIRMAL_SINGH_DHAULA": "AAAP_PIRMAL_SINGH_DHAULA", "SAD_SANT_BALVIR_SINGH_GHUNAS": "SAD_SANT_BALVIR_SINGH_GHUNAS", "INC_JOGINDER_SINGH": "INC_JOGINDER_SINGH", "SAD_M_PARAMJIT_SINGH": "SAD_M_PARAMJIT_SINGH", "Independent_102_BHADAUR_1": "Independent_102_BHADAUR_1", "CPI_ML_L_SAVARAN_SINGH": "CPI_ML_L_SAVARAN_SINGH", "Independent_102_BHADAUR_2": "Independent_102_BHADAUR_2", "Independent_102_BHADAUR_3": "Independent_102_BHADAUR_3", "CPIM_JAGDEEP_SINGH": "CPIM_JAGDEEP_SINGH", "APPA_GURMIT_SINGH": "APPA_GURMIT_SINGH", "AAAP_GURMEET_SINGH_MEET_HAHER": "AAAP_GURMEET_SINGH_MEET_HAHER", "INC_KEWAL_SINGH_DHILLON": "INC_KEWAL_SINGH_DHILLON", "SAD_SURINDER_PAL_SINGH_SIBIA": "SAD_SURINDER_PAL_SINGH_SIBIA", "SAD_M_SIMRANJIT_SINGH_MANN": "SAD_M_SIMRANJIT_SINGH_MANN", "BSP_PARAMJIT_KAUR": "BSP_PARAMJIT_KAUR", "AITC_GURKIMAT_SINGH": "AITC_GURKIMAT_SINGH", "Independent_103_BARNALA_1": "Independent_103_BARNALA_1", "BMUP_JASPAL_SINGH": "BMUP_JASPAL_SINGH", "IVD_RAJ_KUMAR": "IVD_RAJ_KUMAR", "AAAP_KULWANT_SINGH_PANDORI": "AAAP_KULWANT_SINGH_PANDORI", "SAD_AJIT_SINGH_SHANT": "SAD_AJIT_SINGH_SHANT", "INC_HARCHAND_KAUR": "INC_HARCHAND_KAUR", "Independent_104_MEHAL_KALAN_1": "Independent_104_MEHAL_KALAN_1", "CPI_KHUSIA_SINGH": "CPI_KHUSIA_SINGH", "Independent_104_MEHAL_KALAN_2": "Independent_104_MEHAL_KALAN_2", "Independent_104_MEHAL_KALAN_3": "Independent_104_MEHAL_KALAN_3", "BMUP_SARABJIT_SINGH": "BMUP_SARABJIT_SINGH", "INC_RAZIA_SULTANA": "INC_RAZIA_SULTANA", "SAD_MOHAMMAD_OWAIS": "SAD_MOHAMMAD_OWAIS", "AAAP_MOHAMAD_ARSHAD": "AAAP_MOHAMAD_ARSHAD", "BSP_SHAMSHAD_ALI": "BSP_SHAMSHAD_ALI", "IUML_MAHMOOD_AHMED_THIND": "IUML_MAHMOOD_AHMED_THIND", "Independent_105_MALERKOTLA_1": "Independent_105_MALERKOTLA_1", "Independent_105_MALERKOTLA_2": "Independent_105_MALERKOTLA_2", "AITC_PARVEEN_NUSRAT": "AITC_PARVEEN_NUSRAT", "Independent_105_MALERKOTLA_3": "Independent_105_MALERKOTLA_3", "Independent_105_MALERKOTLA_4": "Independent_105_MALERKOTLA_4", "NCP_MAKSOOD_UL_HAK": "NCP_MAKSOOD_UL_HAK", "INC_SURJIT_SINGH_DHIMAN": "INC_SURJIT_SINGH_DHIMAN", "SAD_IQBAL_SINGH_JHUNDAN": "SAD_IQBAL_SINGH_JHUNDAN", "LIP_PROF_JASWANT_SINGH_GAJJANMAJRA": "LIP_PROF_JASWANT_SINGH_GAJJANMAJRA", "CPI_PRITAM_SINGH": "CPI_PRITAM_SINGH", "Independent_106_AMARGARH_1": "Independent_106_AMARGARH_1", "DEMSWP_GURDARSHAN_SINGH": "DEMSWP_GURDARSHAN_SINGH", "SAD_M_KARNAIL_SINGH": "SAD_M_KARNAIL_SINGH", "Independent_106_AMARGARH_2": "Independent_106_AMARGARH_2", "Independent_106_AMARGARH_3": "Independent_106_AMARGARH_3", "Independent_106_AMARGARH_4": "Independent_106_AMARGARH_4", "Independent_106_AMARGARH_5": "Independent_106_AMARGARH_5", "INC_DALVIR_SINGH_GOLDY": "INC_DALVIR_SINGH_GOLDY", "AAAP_JASVIR_SINGH_JASSI_SEKHON": "AAAP_JASVIR_SINGH_JASSI_SEKHON", "SAD_HARI_SINGH": "SAD_HARI_SINGH", "SAD_M_SURJIT_SINGH_KALABULA": "SAD_M_SURJIT_SINGH_KALABULA", "BSP_BHOLA_SINGH": "BSP_BHOLA_SINGH", "Independent_107_DHURI_1": "Independent_107_DHURI_1", "INC_VIJAY_INDER_SINGLA": "INC_VIJAY_INDER_SINGLA", "AAAP_DINESH_BANSAL": "AAAP_DINESH_BANSAL", "SAD_PARKASH_CHAND_GARG": "SAD_PARKASH_CHAND_GARG", "SAD_M_GURNAIB_SINGH": "SAD_M_GURNAIB_SINGH", "BSP_ATMA_SINGH": "BSP_ATMA_SINGH", "Independent_108_SANGRUR_1": "Independent_108_SANGRUR_1", "INC_SADHU_SINGH": "INC_SADHU_SINGH", "AAAP_GURDEV_SINGH_DEV_MANN": "AAAP_GURDEV_SINGH_DEV_MANN", "SAD_KABIR_DASS": "SAD_KABIR_DASS", "Independent_109_NABHA_1": "Independent_109_NABHA_1", "CPI_KASHMIR_SINGH": "CPI_KASHMIR_SINGH", "BSP_JAGTAR_SINGH": "BSP_JAGTAR_SINGH", "Independent_109_NABHA_2": "Independent_109_NABHA_2", "INC_BRAHM_MOHINDRA": "INC_BRAHM_MOHINDRA", "AAAP_KARANVIR_SINGH_TIWANA": "AAAP_KARANVIR_SINGH_TIWANA", "SAD_SATBIR_SINGH_KHATRA": "SAD_SATBIR_SINGH_KHATRA", "CPI_UTTAM_SINGH_BAGRI": "CPI_UTTAM_SINGH_BAGRI", "BSP_SUKH_LAL": "BSP_SUKH_LAL", "APPA_SHAMINDER_KAUR": "APPA_SHAMINDER_KAUR", "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_1": "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_1", "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_2": "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_2", "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_3": "Independent_110_PATIALA_RURAL_3", "BGTD_RANJIT_KAUR": "BGTD_RANJIT_KAUR", "SHS_SHANKAR_BHARADWAJ": "SHS_SHANKAR_BHARADWAJ", "HSS_BHARATDEEP_THAKUR": "HSS_BHARATDEEP_THAKUR", "SAKAP_SOHAN_LAL_SHARMA": "SAKAP_SOHAN_LAL_SHARMA", "INC_HARDIAL_SINGH_KAMBOJ": "INC_HARDIAL_SINGH_KAMBOJ", "AAAP_ASHUTOSH_JOSHI": "AAAP_ASHUTOSH_JOSHI", "BJP_HARJIT_SINGH_GREWAL": "BJP_HARJIT_SINGH_GREWAL", "Independent_111_RAJPURA_1": "Independent_111_RAJPURA_1", "Independent_111_RAJPURA_2": "Independent_111_RAJPURA_2", "BSP_RAVINDER_JAIN": "BSP_RAVINDER_JAIN", "SAD_M_SOBHA_SINGH": "SAD_M_SOBHA_SINGH", "Independent_111_RAJPURA_3": "Independent_111_RAJPURA_3", "Independent_111_RAJPURA_4": "Independent_111_RAJPURA_4", "APPA_RAJINDER_KUMAR": "APPA_RAJINDER_KUMAR", "JJJKP_SHER_SINGH": "JJJKP_SHER_SINGH", "SAD_NARINDER_KUMAR_SHARMA": "SAD_NARINDER_KUMAR_SHARMA", "INC_DEEPINDER_SINGH": "INC_DEEPINDER_SINGH", "AAAP_SARABJIT_KAUR": "AAAP_SARABJIT_KAUR", "SHS_DHARMINDER_KUMAR": "SHS_DHARMINDER_KUMAR", "APPA_AMRIK_SINGH": "APPA_AMRIK_SINGH", "Independent_112_DERA_BASSI_1": "Independent_112_DERA_BASSI_1", "SAKAP_MANJU_KAUSHAL": "SAKAP_MANJU_KAUSHAL", "Independent_112_DERA_BASSI_2": "Independent_112_DERA_BASSI_2", "INC_THEKEDAR_MADAN_LAL_JALALPUR": "INC_THEKEDAR_MADAN_LAL_JALALPUR", "SAD_HARPREET_KAUR_MUKHMAILPUR": "SAD_HARPREET_KAUR_MUKHMAILPUR", "AAAP_ANU_RANDHAWA": "AAAP_ANU_RANDHAWA", "Independent_113_GHANAUR_1": "Independent_113_GHANAUR_1", "BSP_JAGJEET_SINGH": "BSP_JAGJEET_SINGH", "DEMSWP_GURSEWAK_SINGH": "DEMSWP_GURSEWAK_SINGH", "JJJKP_BALJIT_SINGH": "JJJKP_BALJIT_SINGH", "Independent_113_GHANAUR_2": "Independent_113_GHANAUR_2", "SAD_HARINDER_PAL_SINGH_CHANDUMAJRA": "SAD_HARINDER_PAL_SINGH_CHANDUMAJRA", "INC_HARINDER_PAL_SINGH_MANN": "INC_HARINDER_PAL_SINGH_MANN", "AAAP_KULDEEP_KAUR_TOHRA": "AAAP_KULDEEP_KAUR_TOHRA", "Independent_114_SANOUR_1": "Independent_114_SANOUR_1", "Independent_114_SANOUR_2": "Independent_114_SANOUR_2", "Independent_114_SANOUR_3": "Independent_114_SANOUR_3", "BSP_GURPINDER_SINGH_CHHINA": "BSP_GURPINDER_SINGH_CHHINA", "Independent_114_SANOUR_4": "Independent_114_SANOUR_4", "Independent_114_SANOUR_5": "Independent_114_SANOUR_5", "SAD_M_BHUPINDER_SINGH_MASSINGAN": "SAD_M_BHUPINDER_SINGH_MASSINGAN", "Independent_114_SANOUR_6": "Independent_114_SANOUR_6", "SHS_RAJINDER_SINGH": "SHS_RAJINDER_SINGH", "Independent_114_SANOUR_7": "Independent_114_SANOUR_7", "CPM_RAMESH_SINGH": "CPM_RAMESH_SINGH", "Independent_114_SANOUR_8": "Independent_114_SANOUR_8", "Independent_114_SANOUR_9": "Independent_114_SANOUR_9", "Independent_114_SANOUR_10": "Independent_114_SANOUR_10", "BMUP_GURMAIL_SINGH": "BMUP_GURMAIL_SINGH", "AAAP_DR_BALBIR_SINGH": "AAAP_DR_BALBIR_SINGH", "SAD_JOGINDER_JASWANT_SINGH": "SAD_JOGINDER_JASWANT_SINGH", "HSS_KSHAMA_KANT_PANDEY": "HSS_KSHAMA_KANT_PANDEY", "Independent_115_PATIALA_1": "Independent_115_PATIALA_1", "APPA_AKSHNINDER_SINGH": "APPA_AKSHNINDER_SINGH", "INC_RAJINDER_SINGH": "INC_RAJINDER_SINGH", "SAD_SURJIT_SINGH_RAKHRA": "SAD_SURJIT_SINGH_RAKHRA", "AAAP_JAGTAR_SINGH_RAJLA": "AAAP_JAGTAR_SINGH_RAJLA", "BSP_DAVINDER_SINGH_DHIMAN": "BSP_DAVINDER_SINGH_DHIMAN", "Independent_116_SAMANA_1": "Independent_116_SAMANA_1", "Independent_116_SAMANA_2": "Independent_116_SAMANA_2", "Independent_116_SAMANA_3": "Independent_116_SAMANA_3", "INC_NIRMAL_SINGH": "INC_NIRMAL_SINGH", "SAD_VANINDER_KAUR_LOOMBA": "SAD_VANINDER_KAUR_LOOMBA", "AAAP_PALWINDER_KAUR": "AAAP_PALWINDER_KAUR", "SAD_M_AMARJIT_SINGH": "SAD_M_AMARJIT_SINGH", "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_1": "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_1", "BSP_SARDEEP_SINGH": "BSP_SARDEEP_SINGH", "CPI_NARANJAN_SINGH": "CPI_NARANJAN_SINGH", "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_2": "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_2", "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_3": "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_3", "AITC_BALDEV_RAM": "AITC_BALDEV_RAM", "DEMSWP_KULWINDER_SINGH": "DEMSWP_KULWINDER_SINGH", "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_4": "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_4", "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_5": "Independent_117_SHUTRANA_5"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 117, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 117, "registered_not_positive": 117}, "n_stations_flagged": 117, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:39:17.123681", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.604, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.56, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.488, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.069, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.124, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.488, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.287, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.287, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.619, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.568, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.568, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "063847831f7944d69348d37934f3bc85", "name": "India 2019 local (overnight india-haryana-2019-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2019, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Haryana/Haryana_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AAAAP": "AAAAP", "AAAP": "AAAP", "ABHM": "ABHM", "ABKMP": "ABKMP", "ADBNP": "ADBNP", "AIFB": "AIFB", "APoI": "APoI", "AVIRP": "AVIRP", "BAHUMP": "BAHUMP", "BC(M)": "BC(M)", "BHSMWPA": "BHSMWPA", "BHTJP": "BHTJP", "BJP": "BJP", "BJSAP": "BJSAP", "BKNP": "BKNP", "BMFP": "BMFP", "BMUP": "BMUP", "BSCP": "BSCP", "BSP": "BSP", "BVD": "BVD", "BaSaPa": "BaSaPa", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "CPIM": "CPIM", "DSPVAD": "DSPVAD", "HaLP": "HaLP", "INC": "INC", "INLD": "INLD", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "Independent_13_3": "Independent_13_3", "Independent_13_4": "Independent_13_4", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "Independent_14_3": "Independent_14_3", "Independent_14_4": "Independent_14_4", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_15_2": "Independent_15_2", "Independent_15_3": "Independent_15_3", "Independent_15_4": "Independent_15_4", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_16_2": "Independent_16_2", "Independent_16_3": "Independent_16_3", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "Independent_17_3": "Independent_17_3", "Independent_17_4": "Independent_17_4", "Independent_17_5": "Independent_17_5", "Independent_17_6": "Independent_17_6", "Independent_17_7": "Independent_17_7", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_18_3": "Independent_18_3", "Independent_18_4": "Independent_18_4", "Independent_18_5": "Independent_18_5", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "Independent_19_3": "Independent_19_3", "Independent_19_4": "Independent_19_4", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_20_2": "Independent_20_2", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_21_2": "Independent_21_2", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_22_2": "Independent_22_2", "Independent_22_3": "Independent_22_3", "Independent_22_4": "Independent_22_4", "Independent_22_5": "Independent_22_5", "Independent_22_6": "Independent_22_6", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_23_2": "Independent_23_2", "Independent_23_3": "Independent_23_3", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "Independent_24_2": "Independent_24_2", "Independent_24_3": "Independent_24_3", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "Independent_25_4": "Independent_25_4", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "Independent_27_3": "Independent_27_3", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "Independent_2_3": "Independent_2_3", "Independent_2_4": "Independent_2_4", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_31_2": "Independent_31_2", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_32_3": "Independent_32_3", "Independent_32_4": "Independent_32_4", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_34_3": "Independent_34_3", "Independent_34_4": "Independent_34_4", "Independent_34_5": "Independent_34_5", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_36_3": "Independent_36_3", "Independent_36_4": "Independent_36_4", "Independent_36_5": "Independent_36_5", "Independent_36_6": "Independent_36_6", "Independent_36_7": "Independent_36_7", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "Independent_37_3": "Independent_37_3", "Independent_37_4": "Independent_37_4", "Independent_37_5": "Independent_37_5", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_38_3": "Independent_38_3", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_39_2": "Independent_39_2", "Independent_39_3": "Independent_39_3", "Independent_39_4": "Independent_39_4", "Independent_39_5": "Independent_39_5", "Independent_39_6": "Independent_39_6", "Independent_39_7": "Independent_39_7", "Independent_39_8": "Independent_39_8", "Independent_39_9": "Independent_39_9", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "Independent_3_3": "Independent_3_3", "Independent_3_4": "Independent_3_4", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_40_3": "Independent_40_3", "Independent_40_4": "Independent_40_4", "Independent_40_5": "Independent_40_5", "Independent_40_6": "Independent_40_6", "Independent_40_7": "Independent_40_7", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "Independent_41_3": "Independent_41_3", "Independent_41_4": "Independent_41_4", "Independent_41_5": "Independent_41_5", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_42_2": "Independent_42_2", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_43_2": "Independent_43_2", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "Independent_44_3": "Independent_44_3", "Independent_44_4": "Independent_44_4", "Independent_44_5": "Independent_44_5", "Independent_44_6": "Independent_44_6", "Independent_44_7": "Independent_44_7", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_45_10": "Independent_45_10", "Independent_45_11": "Independent_45_11", "Independent_45_2": "Independent_45_2", "Independent_45_3": "Independent_45_3", "Independent_45_4": "Independent_45_4", "Independent_45_5": "Independent_45_5", "Independent_45_6": "Independent_45_6", "Independent_45_7": "Independent_45_7", "Independent_45_8": "Independent_45_8", "Independent_45_9": "Independent_45_9", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "Independent_46_3": "Independent_46_3", "Independent_46_4": "Independent_46_4", "Independent_46_5": "Independent_46_5", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "Independent_47_3": "Independent_47_3", "Independent_47_4": "Independent_47_4", "Independent_47_5": "Independent_47_5", "Independent_47_6": "Independent_47_6", "Independent_47_7": "Independent_47_7", "Independent_47_8": "Independent_47_8", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_48_2": "Independent_48_2", "Independent_48_3": "Independent_48_3", "Independent_48_4": "Independent_48_4", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_49_10": "Independent_49_10", "Independent_49_11": "Independent_49_11", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "Independent_49_3": "Independent_49_3", "Independent_49_4": "Independent_49_4", "Independent_49_5": "Independent_49_5", "Independent_49_6": "Independent_49_6", "Independent_49_7": "Independent_49_7", "Independent_49_8": "Independent_49_8", "Independent_49_9": "Independent_49_9", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_10": "Independent_50_10", "Independent_50_11": "Independent_50_11", "Independent_50_12": "Independent_50_12", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_50_3": "Independent_50_3", "Independent_50_4": "Independent_50_4", "Independent_50_5": "Independent_50_5", "Independent_50_6": "Independent_50_6", "Independent_50_7": "Independent_50_7", "Independent_50_8": "Independent_50_8", "Independent_50_9": "Independent_50_9", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_51_3": "Independent_51_3", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "Independent_52_3": "Independent_52_3", "Independent_52_4": "Independent_52_4", "Independent_52_5": "Independent_52_5", "Independent_52_6": "Independent_52_6", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "Independent_53_2": "Independent_53_2", "Independent_53_3": "Independent_53_3", "Independent_53_4": "Independent_53_4", "Independent_53_5": "Independent_53_5", "Independent_53_6": "Independent_53_6", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_54_3": "Independent_54_3", "Independent_54_4": "Independent_54_4", "Independent_54_5": "Independent_54_5", "Independent_54_6": "Independent_54_6", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_55_2": "Independent_55_2", "Independent_55_3": "Independent_55_3", "Independent_55_4": "Independent_55_4", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_56_2": "Independent_56_2", "Independent_56_3": "Independent_56_3", "Independent_56_4": "Independent_56_4", "Independent_56_5": "Independent_56_5", "Independent_56_6": "Independent_56_6", "Independent_56_7": "Independent_56_7", "Independent_56_8": "Independent_56_8", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_57_2": "Independent_57_2", "Independent_57_3": "Independent_57_3", "Independent_57_4": "Independent_57_4", "Independent_57_5": "Independent_57_5", "Independent_58_1": "Independent_58_1", "Independent_58_2": "Independent_58_2", "Independent_58_3": "Independent_58_3", "Independent_58_4": "Independent_58_4", "Independent_58_5": "Independent_58_5", "Independent_58_6": "Independent_58_6", "Independent_58_7": "Independent_58_7", "Independent_58_8": "Independent_58_8", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_59_2": "Independent_59_2", "Independent_59_3": "Independent_59_3", "Independent_59_4": "Independent_59_4", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "Independent_5_2": "Independent_5_2", "Independent_5_3": "Independent_5_3", "Independent_5_4": "Independent_5_4", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_60_10": "Independent_60_10", "Independent_60_11": "Independent_60_11", "Independent_60_12": "Independent_60_12", "Independent_60_13": "Independent_60_13", "Independent_60_14": "Independent_60_14", "Independent_60_15": "Independent_60_15", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "Independent_60_3": "Independent_60_3", "Independent_60_4": "Independent_60_4", "Independent_60_5": "Independent_60_5", "Independent_60_6": "Independent_60_6", "Independent_60_7": "Independent_60_7", "Independent_60_8": "Independent_60_8", "Independent_60_9": "Independent_60_9", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "Independent_61_3": "Independent_61_3", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_62_3": "Independent_62_3", "Independent_62_4": "Independent_62_4", "Independent_62_5": "Independent_62_5", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_64_2": "Independent_64_2", "Independent_64_3": "Independent_64_3", "Independent_64_4": "Independent_64_4", "Independent_64_5": "Independent_64_5", "Independent_64_6": "Independent_64_6", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_65_2": "Independent_65_2", "Independent_65_3": "Independent_65_3", "Independent_65_4": "Independent_65_4", "Independent_65_5": "Independent_65_5", "Independent_65_6": "Independent_65_6", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_66_2": "Independent_66_2", "Independent_66_3": "Independent_66_3", "Independent_67_1": "Independent_67_1", "Independent_67_2": "Independent_67_2", "Independent_67_3": "Independent_67_3", "Independent_67_4": "Independent_67_4", "Independent_67_5": "Independent_67_5", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "Independent_68_3": "Independent_68_3", "Independent_68_4": "Independent_68_4", "Independent_68_5": "Independent_68_5", "Independent_68_6": "Independent_68_6", "Independent_68_7": "Independent_68_7", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_69_3": "Independent_69_3", "Independent_69_4": "Independent_69_4", "Independent_69_5": "Independent_69_5", "Independent_69_6": "Independent_69_6", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "Independent_6_2": "Independent_6_2", "Independent_6_3": "Independent_6_3", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_72_2": "Independent_72_2", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "Independent_73_3": "Independent_73_3", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_74_2": "Independent_74_2", "Independent_74_3": "Independent_74_3", "Independent_74_4": "Independent_74_4", "Independent_74_5": "Independent_74_5", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_75_2": "Independent_75_2", "Independent_75_3": "Independent_75_3", "Independent_75_4": "Independent_75_4", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_76_3": "Independent_76_3", "Independent_76_4": "Independent_76_4", "Independent_76_5": "Independent_76_5", "Independent_76_6": "Independent_76_6", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_77_2": "Independent_77_2", "Independent_77_3": "Independent_77_3", "Independent_77_4": "Independent_77_4", "Independent_77_5": "Independent_77_5", "Independent_77_6": "Independent_77_6", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_78_2": "Independent_78_2", "Independent_79_1": "Independent_79_1", "Independent_79_2": "Independent_79_2", "Independent_79_3": "Independent_79_3", "Independent_79_4": "Independent_79_4", "Independent_79_5": "Independent_79_5", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "Independent_7_2": "Independent_7_2", "Independent_7_3": "Independent_7_3", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "Independent_81_2": "Independent_81_2", "Independent_81_3": "Independent_81_3", "Independent_81_4": "Independent_81_4", "Independent_82_1": "Independent_82_1", "Independent_82_2": "Independent_82_2", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_83_2": "Independent_83_2", "Independent_83_3": "Independent_83_3", "Independent_83_4": "Independent_83_4", "Independent_83_5": "Independent_83_5", "Independent_84_1": "Independent_84_1", "Independent_84_2": "Independent_84_2", "Independent_84_3": "Independent_84_3", "Independent_84_4": "Independent_84_4", "Independent_85_1": "Independent_85_1", "Independent_85_2": "Independent_85_2", "Independent_85_3": "Independent_85_3", "Independent_85_4": "Independent_85_4", "Independent_85_5": "Independent_85_5", "Independent_86_1": "Independent_86_1", "Independent_86_2": "Independent_86_2", "Independent_86_3": "Independent_86_3", "Independent_86_4": "Independent_86_4", "Independent_86_5": "Independent_86_5", "Independent_86_6": "Independent_86_6", "Independent_87_1": "Independent_87_1", "Independent_88_1": "Independent_88_1", "Independent_88_2": "Independent_88_2", "Independent_88_3": "Independent_88_3", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_89_2": "Independent_89_2", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "Independent_90_1": "Independent_90_1", "Independent_90_2": "Independent_90_2", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "Independent_9_2": "Independent_9_2", "Independent_9_3": "Independent_9_3", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "JDKRP": "JDKRP", "JMBP": "JMBP", "JNJP": "JNJP", "JanSP": "JanSP", "LD": "LD", "LTSP": "LTSP", "MANAWP": "MANAWP", "MYSP": "MYSP", "NCP": "NCP", "NNMP": "NNMP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "PPID": "PPID", "RABSP": "RABSP", "RAM": "RAM", "RBC": "RBC", "RBJJP": "RBJJP", "RGD": "RGD", "RJAVP": "RJAVP", "RJP(E)": "RJP(E)", "RLKP": "RLKP", "RMDVP": "RMDVP", "RMEP": "RMEP", "RMPOI": "RMPOI", "RPI": "RPI", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "RPPRINAT": "RPPRINAT", "RasLP": "RasLP", "RtrJP": "RtrJP", "SAD": "SAD", "SAD(M)": "SAD(M)", "SHPP": "SHPP", "SHS": "SHS", "SP": "SP", "SPAKP": "SPAKP", "SUCI(C)": "SUCI(C)", "SWARAJ": "SWARAJ", "ToP": "ToP", "VINPA": "VINPA", "VIP": "VIP", "VoP": "VoP", "ZKP": "ZKP", "sjsp": "sjsp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 90, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 90, "registered_not_positive": 90}, "n_stations_flagged": 90, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:39:09.896530", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.43, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.324, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.656, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.664, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.43, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.43, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.324, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.324, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.563, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.527, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 90}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e38d8ea3bc8e47ceb679ffb51ee462f8", "name": "India 2018 local (overnight india-chhattisgarh-2018-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2018, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Chhattisgarh/Chhattisgarh_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"INC": "INC", "BJP": "BJP", "GGP": "GGP", "BSP": "BSP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "AAP": "AAP", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "CVGRP": "CVGRP", "BPCP": "BPCP", "PHSP(U)": "PHSP(U)", "JCC(J)": "JCC(J)", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "RGOP": "RGOP", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "Independent_3_3": "Independent_3_3", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "Independent_4_4": "Independent_4_4", "Independent_4_5": "Independent_4_5", "Independent_4_6": "Independent_4_6", "SP": "SP", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "CPM": "CPM", "Independent_5_2": "Independent_5_2", "Independent_5_3": "Independent_5_3", "Independent_5_4": "Independent_5_4", "Independent_5_5": "Independent_5_5", "Independent_5_6": "Independent_5_6", "Independent_5_7": "Independent_5_7", "Independent_5_8": "Independent_5_8", "SHS": "SHS", "Independent_5_9": "Independent_5_9", "Independent_5_10": "Independent_5_10", "Independent_5_11": "Independent_5_11", "Independent_5_12": "Independent_5_12", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "Independent_6_2": "Independent_6_2", "API": "API", "Independent_6_3": "Independent_6_3", "BMUP": "BMUP", "Independent_6_4": "Independent_6_4", "Independent_6_5": "Independent_6_5", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "Independent_7_2": "Independent_7_2", "Independent_7_3": "Independent_7_3", "Independent_7_4": "Independent_7_4", "Independent_7_5": "Independent_7_5", "Independent_7_6": "Independent_7_6", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "Independent_8_3": "Independent_8_3", "Independent_8_4": "Independent_8_4", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "Independent_9_2": "Independent_9_2", "NCP": "NCP", "Independent_9_3": "Independent_9_3", "Independent_9_4": "Independent_9_4", "Independent_9_5": "Independent_9_5", "Independent_9_6": "Independent_9_6", "Independent_9_7": "Independent_9_7", "Independent_9_8": "Independent_9_8", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "Independent_10_3": "Independent_10_3", "Independent_10_4": "Independent_10_4", "Independent_10_5": "Independent_10_5", "Independent_10_6": "Independent_10_6", "CSM": "CSM", "Independent_10_7": "Independent_10_7", "Independent_10_8": "Independent_10_8", "Independent_10_9": "Independent_10_9", "Independent_10_10": "Independent_10_10", "RmGP": "RmGP", "JC": "JC", "Independent_10_11": "Independent_10_11", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "Independent_11_3": "Independent_11_3", "Independent_11_4": "Independent_11_4", "Independent_11_5": "Independent_11_5", "Independent_11_6": "Independent_11_6", "Independent_11_7": "Independent_11_7", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "Independent_12_3": "Independent_12_3", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "Independent_12_4": "Independent_12_4", "BTP": "BTP", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "Independent_13_3": "Independent_13_3", "Independent_13_4": "Independent_13_4", "CSP": "CSP", "Independent_13_5": "Independent_13_5", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "Independent_14_3": "Independent_14_3", "Independent_14_4": "Independent_14_4", "BBC": "BBC", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_15_2": "Independent_15_2", "Independent_15_3": "Independent_15_3", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_16_2": "Independent_16_2", "Independent_16_3": "Independent_16_3", "Independent_16_4": "Independent_16_4", "Independent_16_5": "Independent_16_5", "BRSP": "BRSP", "Independent_16_6": "Independent_16_6", "Independent_16_7": "Independent_16_7", "Independent_16_8": "Independent_16_8", "Independent_16_9": "Independent_16_9", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "Independent_17_3": "Independent_17_3", "Independent_17_4": "Independent_17_4", "Independent_17_5": "Independent_17_5", "BLRP": "BLRP", "SUSP": "SUSP", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_18_3": "Independent_18_3", "Independent_18_4": "Independent_18_4", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_20_2": "Independent_20_2", "ADVIP": "ADVIP", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_21_2": "Independent_21_2", "Independent_21_3": "Independent_21_3", "Independent_21_4": "Independent_21_4", "Independent_21_5": "Independent_21_5", "Independent_21_6": "Independent_21_6", "Independent_21_7": "Independent_21_7", "Independent_21_8": "Independent_21_8", "Independent_21_9": "Independent_21_9", "Independent_21_10": "Independent_21_10", "Independent_21_11": "Independent_21_11", "BBHP": "BBHP", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "Independent_24_2": "Independent_24_2", "Independent_24_3": "Independent_24_3", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "Independent_26_3": "Independent_26_3", "Independent_26_4": "Independent_26_4", "Independent_26_5": "Independent_26_5", "Independent_26_6": "Independent_26_6", "Independent_26_7": "Independent_26_7", "Independent_26_8": "Independent_26_8", "Independent_26_9": "Independent_26_9", "Independent_26_10": "Independent_26_10", "Independent_26_11": "Independent_26_11", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "Independent_27_3": "Independent_27_3", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "RtJP": "RtJP", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "BSCP": "BSCP", "Independent_28_4": "Independent_28_4", "Independent_28_5": "Independent_28_5", "Independent_28_6": "Independent_28_6", "ASBAP": "ASBAP", "Independent_28_7": "Independent_28_7", "Independent_28_8": "Independent_28_8", "Independent_28_9": "Independent_28_9", "Independent_28_10": "Independent_28_10", "Independent_28_11": "Independent_28_11", "Independent_28_12": "Independent_28_12", "Independent_28_13": "Independent_28_13", "Independent_28_14": "Independent_28_14", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "Independent_29_4": "Independent_29_4", "Independent_29_5": "Independent_29_5", "Independent_29_6": "Independent_29_6", "Independent_29_7": "Independent_29_7", "Independent_29_8": "Independent_29_8", "Independent_29_9": "Independent_29_9", "Independent_29_10": "Independent_29_10", "Independent_29_11": "Independent_29_11", "Independent_29_12": "Independent_29_12", "Independent_29_13": "Independent_29_13", "BSSP": "BSSP", "Independent_29_14": "Independent_29_14", "Independent_29_15": "Independent_29_15", "Independent_29_16": "Independent_29_16", "Independent_29_17": "Independent_29_17", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "Independent_30_3": "Independent_30_3", "Independent_30_4": "Independent_30_4", "ABSDSP": "ABSDSP", "Independent_30_5": "Independent_30_5", "Independent_30_6": "Independent_30_6", "Independent_30_7": "Independent_30_7", "Independent_30_8": "Independent_30_8", "Independent_30_9": "Independent_30_9", "IPBP": "IPBP", "Independent_30_10": "Independent_30_10", "Independent_30_11": "Independent_30_11", "Independent_30_12": "Independent_30_12", "Independent_30_13": "Independent_30_13", "Independent_30_14": "Independent_30_14", "Independent_30_15": "Independent_30_15", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_31_2": "Independent_31_2", "Independent_31_3": "Independent_31_3", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_32_3": "Independent_32_3", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "Independent_33_4": "Independent_33_4", "NDPF": "NDPF", "BHKP": "BHKP", "Independent_33_5": "Independent_33_5", "CPI": "CPI", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_34_3": "Independent_34_3", "Independent_34_4": "Independent_34_4", "NINSHAD": "NINSHAD", "Independent_34_5": "Independent_34_5", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "Independent_35_2": "Independent_35_2", "Independent_35_3": "Independent_35_3", "Independent_35_4": "Independent_35_4", "Independent_35_5": "Independent_35_5", "KMZSP": "KMZSP", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_36_3": "Independent_36_3", "Independent_36_4": "Independent_36_4", "Independent_36_5": "Independent_36_5", "Independent_36_6": "Independent_36_6", "Independent_36_7": "Independent_36_7", "Independent_36_8": "Independent_36_8", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "Independent_37_3": "Independent_37_3", "Independent_37_4": "Independent_37_4", "Independent_37_5": "Independent_37_5", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_38_3": "Independent_38_3", "BPSGKD": "BPSGKD", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_40_3": "Independent_40_3", "Independent_40_4": "Independent_40_4", "Independent_40_5": "Independent_40_5", "Independent_40_6": "Independent_40_6", "Independent_40_7": "Independent_40_7", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "Independent_41_3": "Independent_41_3", "Independent_41_4": "Independent_41_4", "Independent_41_5": "Independent_41_5", "Independent_41_6": "Independent_41_6", "Independent_41_7": "Independent_41_7", "Independent_41_8": "Independent_41_8", "Independent_41_9": "Independent_41_9", "Independent_41_10": "Independent_41_10", "Independent_41_11": "Independent_41_11", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_42_2": "Independent_42_2", "Independent_42_3": "Independent_42_3", "Independent_42_4": "Independent_42_4", "Independent_42_5": "Independent_42_5", "Independent_42_6": "Independent_42_6", "Independent_42_7": "Independent_42_7", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_43_2": "Independent_43_2", "Independent_43_3": "Independent_43_3", "Independent_43_4": "Independent_43_4", "Independent_43_5": "Independent_43_5", "Independent_43_6": "Independent_43_6", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "Independent_44_3": "Independent_44_3", "Independent_44_4": "Independent_44_4", "Independent_44_5": "Independent_44_5", "Independent_44_6": "Independent_44_6", "Independent_44_7": "Independent_44_7", "Independent_44_8": "Independent_44_8", "Independent_44_9": "Independent_44_9", "Independent_44_10": "Independent_44_10", "Independent_44_11": "Independent_44_11", "Independent_44_12": "Independent_44_12", "Independent_44_13": "Independent_44_13", "Independent_44_14": "Independent_44_14", "Independent_44_15": "Independent_44_15", "Independent_44_16": "Independent_44_16", "Independent_44_17": "Independent_44_17", "Independent_44_18": "Independent_44_18", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_45_2": "Independent_45_2", "Independent_45_3": "Independent_45_3", "Independent_45_4": "Independent_45_4", "Independent_45_5": "Independent_45_5", "BHMM": "BHMM", "Independent_45_6": "Independent_45_6", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "Independent_46_3": "Independent_46_3", "Independent_46_4": "Independent_46_4", "Independent_46_5": "Independent_46_5", "ASSP": "ASSP", "Independent_46_6": "Independent_46_6", "Independent_46_7": "Independent_46_7", "Independent_46_8": "Independent_46_8", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "Independent_47_3": "Independent_47_3", "Independent_47_4": "Independent_47_4", "Independent_47_5": "Independent_47_5", "Independent_47_6": "Independent_47_6", "Independent_47_7": "Independent_47_7", "Independent_47_8": "Independent_47_8", "Independent_47_9": "Independent_47_9", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_48_2": "Independent_48_2", "Independent_48_3": "Independent_48_3", "Independent_48_4": "Independent_48_4", "Independent_48_5": "Independent_48_5", "Independent_48_6": "Independent_48_6", "Independent_48_7": "Independent_48_7", "Independent_48_8": "Independent_48_8", "BHBP": "BHBP", "Independent_48_9": "Independent_48_9", "Independent_48_10": "Independent_48_10", "Independent_48_11": "Independent_48_11", "Independent_48_12": "Independent_48_12", "Independent_48_13": "Independent_48_13", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "Independent_49_3": "Independent_49_3", "Independent_49_4": "Independent_49_4", "Independent_49_5": "Independent_49_5", "Independent_49_6": "Independent_49_6", "Independent_49_7": "Independent_49_7", "Independent_49_8": "Independent_49_8", "Independent_49_9": "Independent_49_9", "Independent_49_10": "Independent_49_10", "Independent_49_11": "Independent_49_11", "Independent_49_12": "Independent_49_12", "Independent_49_13": "Independent_49_13", "Independent_49_14": "Independent_49_14", "Independent_49_15": "Independent_49_15", "Independent_49_16": "Independent_49_16", "Independent_49_17": "Independent_49_17", "Independent_49_18": "Independent_49_18", "Independent_49_19": "Independent_49_19", "Independent_49_20": "Independent_49_20", "CSJP": "CSJP", "Independent_49_21": "Independent_49_21", "Independent_49_22": "Independent_49_22", "Independent_49_23": "Independent_49_23", "Independent_49_24": "Independent_49_24", "Independent_49_25": "Independent_49_25", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_50_3": "Independent_50_3", "Independent_50_4": "Independent_50_4", "Independent_50_5": "Independent_50_5", "Independent_50_6": "Independent_50_6", "ABHM": "ABHM", "Independent_50_7": "Independent_50_7", "Independent_50_8": "Independent_50_8", "Independent_50_9": "Independent_50_9", "Independent_50_10": "Independent_50_10", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_51_3": "Independent_51_3", "Independent_51_4": "Independent_51_4", "Independent_51_5": "Independent_51_5", "Independent_51_6": "Independent_51_6", "Independent_51_7": "Independent_51_7", "Independent_51_8": "Independent_51_8", "Independent_51_9": "Independent_51_9", "Independent_51_10": "Independent_51_10", "Independent_51_11": "Independent_51_11", "BSHSP": "BSHSP", "Independent_51_12": "Independent_51_12", "Independent_51_13": "Independent_51_13", "Independent_51_14": "Independent_51_14", "ANAP": "ANAP", "Independent_51_15": "Independent_51_15", "Independent_51_16": "Independent_51_16", "Independent_51_17": "Independent_51_17", "Independent_51_18": "Independent_51_18", "Independent_51_19": "Independent_51_19", "Independent_51_20": "Independent_51_20", "Independent_51_21": "Independent_51_21", "Independent_51_22": "Independent_51_22", "Independent_51_23": "Independent_51_23", "Independent_51_24": "Independent_51_24", "Independent_51_25": "Independent_51_25", "Independent_51_26": "Independent_51_26", "Independent_51_27": "Independent_51_27", "Independent_51_28": "Independent_51_28", "Independent_51_29": "Independent_51_29", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "CGVP": "CGVP", "Independent_52_3": "Independent_52_3", "Independent_52_4": "Independent_52_4", "Independent_52_5": "Independent_52_5", "Independent_52_6": "Independent_52_6", "Independent_52_7": "Independent_52_7", "SS(BD)": "SS(BD)", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "Independent_53_2": "Independent_53_2", "Independent_53_3": "Independent_53_3", "Independent_53_4": "Independent_53_4", "Independent_53_5": "Independent_53_5", "Independent_53_6": "Independent_53_6", "Independent_53_7": "Independent_53_7", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "CPI(M)RS": "CPI(M)RS", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_54_3": "Independent_54_3", "Independent_54_4": "Independent_54_4", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "LSWP": "LSWP", "Independent_56_2": "Independent_56_2", "Independent_56_3": "Independent_56_3", "Independent_56_4": "Independent_56_4", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_57_2": "Independent_57_2", "Independent_57_3": "Independent_57_3", "Independent_57_4": "Independent_57_4", "Independent_57_5": "Independent_57_5", "Independent_57_6": "Independent_57_6", "Independent_57_7": "Independent_57_7", "Independent_58_1": "Independent_58_1", "Independent_58_2": "Independent_58_2", "Independent_58_3": "Independent_58_3", "Independent_58_4": "Independent_58_4", "Independent_58_5": "Independent_58_5", "Independent_58_6": "Independent_58_6", "Independent_58_7": "Independent_58_7", "Independent_58_8": "Independent_58_8", "Independent_58_9": "Independent_58_9", "Independent_58_10": "Independent_58_10", "Independent_58_11": "Independent_58_11", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_59_2": "Independent_59_2", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "Independent_60_3": "Independent_60_3", "SWAP": "SWAP", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "Independent_61_3": "Independent_61_3", "Independent_61_4": "Independent_61_4", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_62_3": "Independent_62_3", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "DEPI": "DEPI", "Independent_63_3": "Independent_63_3", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_64_2": "Independent_64_2", "Independent_64_3": "Independent_64_3", "Independent_64_4": "Independent_64_4", "SUCI": "SUCI", "Independent_64_5": "Independent_64_5", "Independent_64_6": "Independent_64_6", "Independent_64_7": "Independent_64_7", "Independent_64_8": "Independent_64_8", "Independent_64_9": "Independent_64_9", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_65_2": "Independent_65_2", "Independent_65_3": "Independent_65_3", "Independent_65_4": "Independent_65_4", "Independent_65_5": "Independent_65_5", "RSSM": "RSSM", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_66_2": "Independent_66_2", "Independent_66_3": "Independent_66_3", "Independent_66_4": "Independent_66_4", "Independent_66_5": "Independent_66_5", "Independent_66_6": "Independent_66_6", "Independent_67_1": "Independent_67_1", "Independent_67_2": "Independent_67_2", "Independent_67_3": "Independent_67_3", "Independent_67_4": "Independent_67_4", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "Independent_68_3": "Independent_68_3", "Independent_68_4": "Independent_68_4", "Independent_68_5": "Independent_68_5", "Independent_68_6": "Independent_68_6", "Independent_68_7": "Independent_68_7", "Independent_68_8": "Independent_68_8", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_69_3": "Independent_69_3", "Independent_69_4": "Independent_69_4", "Independent_69_5": "Independent_69_5", "Independent_69_6": "Independent_69_6", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "Independent_70_2": "Independent_70_2", "Independent_70_3": "Independent_70_3", "Independent_70_4": "Independent_70_4", "Independent_70_5": "Independent_70_5", "Independent_70_6": "Independent_70_6", "Independent_70_7": "Independent_70_7", "Independent_70_8": "Independent_70_8", "Independent_70_9": "Independent_70_9", "Independent_70_10": "Independent_70_10", "Independent_71_1": "Independent_71_1", "Independent_71_2": "Independent_71_2", "Independent_71_3": "Independent_71_3", "Independent_71_4": "Independent_71_4", "Independent_71_5": "Independent_71_5", "Independent_71_6": "Independent_71_6", "Independent_71_7": "Independent_71_7", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_72_2": "Independent_72_2", "Independent_72_3": "Independent_72_3", "Independent_72_4": "Independent_72_4", "Independent_72_5": "Independent_72_5", "Independent_72_6": "Independent_72_6", "Independent_72_7": "Independent_72_7", "Independent_72_8": "Independent_72_8", "Independent_72_9": "Independent_72_9", "Independent_72_10": "Independent_72_10", "Independent_72_11": "Independent_72_11", "Independent_72_12": "Independent_72_12", "Independent_72_13": "Independent_72_13", "Independent_72_14": "Independent_72_14", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "Independent_73_3": "Independent_73_3", "Independent_73_4": "Independent_73_4", "Independent_73_5": "Independent_73_5", "Independent_73_6": "Independent_73_6", "Independent_73_7": "Independent_73_7", "Independent_73_8": "Independent_73_8", "Independent_73_9": "Independent_73_9", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_74_2": "Independent_74_2", "Independent_74_3": "Independent_74_3", "Independent_74_4": "Independent_74_4", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_75_2": "Independent_75_2", "Independent_75_3": "Independent_75_3", "Independent_75_4": "Independent_75_4", "Independent_75_5": "Independent_75_5", "Independent_75_6": "Independent_75_6", "Independent_75_7": "Independent_75_7", "RP(K)": "RP(K)", "Independent_75_8": "Independent_75_8", "CMM": "CMM", "Independent_75_9": "Independent_75_9", "Independent_75_10": "Independent_75_10", "Independent_75_11": "Independent_75_11", "Independent_75_12": "Independent_75_12", "Independent_75_13": "Independent_75_13", "Independent_75_14": "Independent_75_14", "Independent_75_15": "Independent_75_15", "Independent_75_16": "Independent_75_16", "Independent_75_17": "Independent_75_17", "Independent_75_18": "Independent_75_18", "Independent_75_19": "Independent_75_19", "Independent_75_20": "Independent_75_20", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_76_3": "Independent_76_3", "Independent_76_4": "Independent_76_4", "Independent_76_5": "Independent_76_5", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_77_2": "Independent_77_2", "Independent_77_3": "Independent_77_3", "Independent_77_4": "Independent_77_4", "Independent_77_5": "Independent_77_5", "Independent_77_6": "Independent_77_6", "Independent_77_7": "Independent_77_7", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_78_2": "Independent_78_2", "Independent_78_3": "Independent_78_3", "Independent_79_1": "Independent_79_1", "Independent_79_2": "Independent_79_2", "Independent_79_3": "Independent_79_3", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "Independent_82_1": "Independent_82_1", "Independent_82_2": "Independent_82_2", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_84_1": "Independent_84_1", "Independent_85_1": "Independent_85_1", "Independent_86_1": "Independent_86_1", "Independent_86_2": "Independent_86_2", "Independent_86_3": "Independent_86_3", "RJSMP": "RJSMP", "Independent_86_4": "Independent_86_4", "Independent_86_5": "Independent_86_5", "ABSKP": "ABSKP", "Independent_86_6": "Independent_86_6", "BNIP": "BNIP", "Independent_86_7": "Independent_86_7", "Independent_87_1": "Independent_87_1", "Independent_88_1": "Independent_88_1", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_89_2": "Independent_89_2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 90, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 90, "registered_not_positive": 90}, "n_stations_flagged": 90, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:39:06.734944", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.604, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.56, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.482, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.363, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.069, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.482, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.482, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.363, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.277, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.277, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.623, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.546, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.546, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 90}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "09785d66f7e049f48ae3796fc8c74986", "name": "India 2019 local (overnight india_jharkhand_2019_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2019, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Jharkhand/Jharkhand_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"BJP_RAJMAHAL": "BJP_RAJMAHAL", "AJSUP_RAJMAHAL": "AJSUP_RAJMAHAL", "JMM_RAJMAHAL": "JMM_RAJMAHAL", "BSP_RAJMAHAL": "BSP_RAJMAHAL", "Independent_RAJMAHAL_1": "Independent_RAJMAHAL_1", "Independent_RAJMAHAL_2": "Independent_RAJMAHAL_2", "Independent_RAJMAHAL_3": "Independent_RAJMAHAL_3", "Independent_RAJMAHAL_4": "Independent_RAJMAHAL_4", "Independent_RAJMAHAL_5": "Independent_RAJMAHAL_5", "AIMIM_RAJMAHAL": "AIMIM_RAJMAHAL", "NOTA_RAJMAHAL": "NOTA_RAJMAHAL", "Independent_RAJMAHAL_6": "Independent_RAJMAHAL_6", "RPPRINAT_RAJMAHAL": "RPPRINAT_RAJMAHAL", "JVM_RAJMAHAL": "JVM_RAJMAHAL", "Independent_RAJMAHAL_7": "Independent_RAJMAHAL_7", "Independent_RAJMAHAL_8": "Independent_RAJMAHAL_8", "RJBP_RAJMAHAL": "RJBP_RAJMAHAL", "LJP_RAJMAHAL": "LJP_RAJMAHAL", "PPID_RAJMAHAL": "PPID_RAJMAHAL", "SHS_RAJMAHAL": "SHS_RAJMAHAL", "Independent_RAJMAHAL_9": "Independent_RAJMAHAL_9", "Independent_RAJMAHAL_10": "Independent_RAJMAHAL_10", "Independent_RAJMAHAL_11": "Independent_RAJMAHAL_11", "RKSP_RAJMAHAL": "RKSP_RAJMAHAL", "JMM_BORIO": "JMM_BORIO", "BJP_BORIO": "BJP_BORIO", "AJSUP_BORIO": "AJSUP_BORIO", "CPI_BORIO": "CPI_BORIO", "NOTA_BORIO": "NOTA_BORIO", "JD_U_BORIO": "JD_U_BORIO", "BSP_BORIO": "BSP_BORIO", "PPID_BORIO": "PPID_BORIO", "Independent_BORIO_1": "Independent_BORIO_1", "JVM_BORIO": "JVM_BORIO", "Independent_BORIO_2": "Independent_BORIO_2", "RTMP_BORIO": "RTMP_BORIO", "AITC_BORIO": "AITC_BORIO", "JMM_BARHAIT": "JMM_BARHAIT", "BJP_BARHAIT": "BJP_BARHAIT", "JVM_BARHAIT": "JVM_BARHAIT", "AJSUP_BARHAIT": "AJSUP_BARHAIT", "NOTA_BARHAIT": "NOTA_BARHAIT", "LJP_BARHAIT": "LJP_BARHAIT", "Independent_BARHAIT_1": "Independent_BARHAIT_1", "Independent_BARHAIT_2": "Independent_BARHAIT_2", "Independent_BARHAIT_3": "Independent_BARHAIT_3", "AITC_BARHAIT": "AITC_BARHAIT", "PPID_BARHAIT": "PPID_BARHAIT", "BSP_BARHAIT": "BSP_BARHAIT", "SHS_BARHAIT": "SHS_BARHAIT", "JMM_LITIPARA": "JMM_LITIPARA", "BJP_LITIPARA": "BJP_LITIPARA", "JVM_LITIPARA": "JVM_LITIPARA", "CPM_LITIPARA": "CPM_LITIPARA", "NOTA_LITIPARA": "NOTA_LITIPARA", "AITC_LITIPARA": "AITC_LITIPARA", "Independent_LITIPARA_1": "Independent_LITIPARA_1", "Independent_LITIPARA_2": "Independent_LITIPARA_2", "Independent_LITIPARA_3": "Independent_LITIPARA_3", "Independent_LITIPARA_4": "Independent_LITIPARA_4", "LJP_LITIPARA": "LJP_LITIPARA", "JD_U_LITIPARA": "JD_U_LITIPARA", "INC_PAKHUR": "INC_PAKHUR", "BJP_PAKHUR": "BJP_PAKHUR", "AJSUP_PAKHUR": "AJSUP_PAKHUR", "CPM_PAKHUR": "CPM_PAKHUR", "Independent_PAKHUR_1": "Independent_PAKHUR_1", "NOTA_PAKHUR": "NOTA_PAKHUR", "AITC_PAKHUR": "AITC_PAKHUR", "JVM_PAKHUR": "JVM_PAKHUR", "JP_PAKHUR": "JP_PAKHUR", "SHS_PAKHUR": "SHS_PAKHUR", "LJP_PAKHUR": "LJP_PAKHUR", "AIFB_PAKHUR": "AIFB_PAKHUR", "JMM_MAHESHPUR": "JMM_MAHESHPUR", "BJP_MAHESHPUR": "BJP_MAHESHPUR", "CPM_MAHESHPUR": "CPM_MAHESHPUR", "JVM_MAHESHPUR": "JVM_MAHESHPUR", "AJSUP_MAHESHPUR": "AJSUP_MAHESHPUR", "NOTA_MAHESHPUR": "NOTA_MAHESHPUR", "Independent_MAHESHPUR_1": "Independent_MAHESHPUR_1", "JKPP_MAHESHPUR": "JKPP_MAHESHPUR", "JD_U_MAHESHPUR": "JD_U_MAHESHPUR", "BSP_MAHESHPUR": "BSP_MAHESHPUR", "Independent_MAHESHPUR_2": "Independent_MAHESHPUR_2", "AITC_MAHESHPUR": "AITC_MAHESHPUR", "Independent_MAHESHPUR_3": "Independent_MAHESHPUR_3", "JMM_SHIKARIPARA": "JMM_SHIKARIPARA", "BJP_SHIKARIPARA": "BJP_SHIKARIPARA", "JVM_SHIKARIPARA": "JVM_SHIKARIPARA", "JD_U_SHIKARIPARA": "JD_U_SHIKARIPARA", "NOTA_SHIKARIPARA": "NOTA_SHIKARIPARA", "Independent_SHIKARIPARA_1": "Independent_SHIKARIPARA_1", "AITC_SHIKARIPARA": "AITC_SHIKARIPARA", "Independent_SHIKARIPARA_2": "Independent_SHIKARIPARA_2", "AJSUP_SHIKARIPARA": "AJSUP_SHIKARIPARA", "JKPP_SHIKARIPARA": "JKPP_SHIKARIPARA", "Independent_SHIKARIPARA_3": "Independent_SHIKARIPARA_3", "LJP_SHIKARIPARA": "LJP_SHIKARIPARA", "RJBP_SHIKARIPARA": "RJBP_SHIKARIPARA", "JKKP_SHIKARIPARA": "JKKP_SHIKARIPARA", "JMM_NALA": "JMM_NALA", "BJP_NALA": "BJP_NALA", "CPI_NALA": "CPI_NALA", "AJSUP_NALA": "AJSUP_NALA", "JVM_NALA": "JVM_NALA", "LJP_NALA": "LJP_NALA", "Independent_NALA_1": "Independent_NALA_1", "BRRTD_NALA": "BRRTD_NALA", "AAAP_NALA": "AAAP_NALA", "APoI_NALA": "APoI_NALA", "LOKJANP_NALA": "LOKJANP_NALA", "AITC_NALA": "AITC_NALA", "NPEP_NALA": "NPEP_NALA", "JD_U_NALA": "JD_U_NALA", "BSP_NALA": "BSP_NALA", "BLRP_NALA": "BLRP_NALA", "NOTA_NALA": "NOTA_NALA", "INC_JAMTARA": "INC_JAMTARA", "BJP_JAMTARA": "BJP_JAMTARA", "Independent_JAMTARA_1": "Independent_JAMTARA_1", "AJSUP_JAMTARA": "AJSUP_JAMTARA", "Independent_JAMTARA_2": "Independent_JAMTARA_2", "NOTA_JAMTARA": "NOTA_JAMTARA", "JVM_JAMTARA": "JVM_JAMTARA", "Independent_JAMTARA_3": "Independent_JAMTARA_3", "Independent_JAMTARA_4": "Independent_JAMTARA_4", "SP_JAMTARA": "SP_JAMTARA", "BSP_JAMTARA": "BSP_JAMTARA", "RTMP_JAMTARA": "RTMP_JAMTARA", "LOKJANP_JAMTARA": "LOKJANP_JAMTARA", "LJP_JAMTARA": "LJP_JAMTARA", "JMM_DUMKA": "JMM_DUMKA", "BJP_DUMKA": "BJP_DUMKA", "JVM_DUMKA": "JVM_DUMKA", "JD_U_DUMKA": "JD_U_DUMKA", "NOTA_DUMKA": "NOTA_DUMKA", "LOKJANP_DUMKA": "LOKJANP_DUMKA", "Independent_DUMKA_1": "Independent_DUMKA_1", "Independent_DUMKA_2": "Independent_DUMKA_2", "JMM_U_DUMKA": "JMM_U_DUMKA", "Independent_DUMKA_3": "Independent_DUMKA_3", "CPI_DUMKA": "CPI_DUMKA", "BSP_DUMKA": "BSP_DUMKA", "LJP_DUMKA": "LJP_DUMKA", "AAAP_DUMKA": "AAAP_DUMKA", "JMM_JAMA": "JMM_JAMA", "BJP_JAMA": "BJP_JAMA", "JVM_JAMA": "JVM_JAMA", "Independent_JAMA_1": "Independent_JAMA_1", "AJSUP_JAMA": "AJSUP_JAMA", "Independent_JAMA_2": "Independent_JAMA_2", "NOTA_JAMA": "NOTA_JAMA", "Independent_JAMA_3": "Independent_JAMA_3", "BSP_JAMA": "BSP_JAMA", "Independent_JAMA_4": "Independent_JAMA_4", "Independent_JAMA_5": "Independent_JAMA_5", "Independent_JAMA_6": "Independent_JAMA_6", "Independent_JAMA_7": "Independent_JAMA_7", "LJP_JAMA": "LJP_JAMA", "Independent_JAMA_8": "Independent_JAMA_8", "Independent_JAMA_9": "Independent_JAMA_9", "INC_JARMUNDI": "INC_JARMUNDI", "BJP_JARMUNDI": "BJP_JARMUNDI", "Independent_JARMUNDI_1": "Independent_JARMUNDI_1", "JVM_JARMUNDI": "JVM_JARMUNDI", "Independent_JARMUNDI_2": "Independent_JARMUNDI_2", "Independent_JARMUNDI_3": "Independent_JARMUNDI_3", "Independent_JARMUNDI_4": "Independent_JARMUNDI_4", "Independent_JARMUNDI_5": "Independent_JARMUNDI_5", "IUML_JARMUNDI": "IUML_JARMUNDI", "LJP_JARMUNDI": "LJP_JARMUNDI", "BSP_JARMUNDI": "BSP_JARMUNDI", "Independent_JARMUNDI_6": "Independent_JARMUNDI_6", "AITC_JARMUNDI": "AITC_JARMUNDI", "NOTA_JARMUNDI": "NOTA_JARMUNDI", "HAMS_JARMUNDI": "HAMS_JARMUNDI", "Independent_JARMUNDI_7": "Independent_JARMUNDI_7", "SP_JARMUNDI": "SP_JARMUNDI", "Independent_JARMUNDI_8": "Independent_JARMUNDI_8", "MCO_JARMUNDI": "MCO_JARMUNDI", "Independent_JARMUNDI_9": "Independent_JARMUNDI_9", "JD_U_JARMUNDI": "JD_U_JARMUNDI", "Independent_JARMUNDI_10": "Independent_JARMUNDI_10", "Independent_JARMUNDI_11": "Independent_JARMUNDI_11", "BALP_JARMUNDI": "BALP_JARMUNDI", "SAP_JARMUNDI": "SAP_JARMUNDI", "JKPP_JARMUNDI": "JKPP_JARMUNDI", "Independent_JARMUNDI_12": "Independent_JARMUNDI_12", "JMM_MADHUPUR": "JMM_MADHUPUR", "BJP_MADHUPUR": "BJP_MADHUPUR", "AJSUP_MADHUPUR": "AJSUP_MADHUPUR", "AIMIM_MADHUPUR": "AIMIM_MADHUPUR", "NOTA_MADHUPUR": "NOTA_MADHUPUR", "JVM_MADHUPUR": "JVM_MADHUPUR", "Independent_MADHUPUR_1": "Independent_MADHUPUR_1", "BSP_MADHUPUR": "BSP_MADHUPUR", "BALP_MADHUPUR": "BALP_MADHUPUR", "HAMS_MADHUPUR": "HAMS_MADHUPUR", "MCO_MADHUPUR": "MCO_MADHUPUR", "AITC_MADHUPUR": "AITC_MADHUPUR", "BLokSP_MADHUPUR": "BLokSP_MADHUPUR", "SP_MADHUPUR": "SP_MADHUPUR", "BJP_SARATH": "BJP_SARATH", "JVM_SARATH": "JVM_SARATH", "JMM_SARATH": "JMM_SARATH", "AIMIM_SARATH": "AIMIM_SARATH", "Independent_SARATH_1": "Independent_SARATH_1", "Independent_SARATH_2": "Independent_SARATH_2", "Independent_SARATH_3": "Independent_SARATH_3", "AJSUP_SARATH": "AJSUP_SARATH", "Independent_SARATH_4": "Independent_SARATH_4", "AAAP_SARATH": "AAAP_SARATH", "Independent_SARATH_5": "Independent_SARATH_5", "Independent_SARATH_6": "Independent_SARATH_6", "NOTA_SARATH": "NOTA_SARATH", "LJP_SARATH": "LJP_SARATH", "Independent_SARATH_7": "Independent_SARATH_7", "RJBP_SARATH": "RJBP_SARATH", "JKPP_SARATH": "JKPP_SARATH", "SP_SARATH": "SP_SARATH", "Independent_SARATH_8": "Independent_SARATH_8", "Independent_SARATH_9": "Independent_SARATH_9", "BALP_SARATH": "BALP_SARATH", "Independent_SARATH_10": "Independent_SARATH_10", "BJP_DEOGHAR": "BJP_DEOGHAR", "RJD_DEOGHAR": "RJD_DEOGHAR", "JVM_DEOGHAR": "JVM_DEOGHAR", "LJP_DEOGHAR": "LJP_DEOGHAR", "NOTA_DEOGHAR": "NOTA_DEOGHAR", "AJSUP_DEOGHAR": "AJSUP_DEOGHAR", "Independent_DEOGHAR_1": "Independent_DEOGHAR_1", "BSP_DEOGHAR": "BSP_DEOGHAR", "BMUP_DEOGHAR": "BMUP_DEOGHAR", "JD_U_DEOGHAR": "JD_U_DEOGHAR", "CPI_ML_L_DEOGHAR": "CPI_ML_L_DEOGHAR", "BDlP_DEOGHAR": "BDlP_DEOGHAR", "AIFB_DEOGHAR": "AIFB_DEOGHAR", "JVM_POREYAHAT": "JVM_POREYAHAT", "BJP_POREYAHAT": "BJP_POREYAHAT", "JMM_POREYAHAT": "JMM_POREYAHAT", "NOTA_POREYAHAT": "NOTA_POREYAHAT", "Independent_POREYAHAT_1": "Independent_POREYAHAT_1", "BNJD_POREYAHAT": "BNJD_POREYAHAT", "BDlP_POREYAHAT": "BDlP_POREYAHAT", "BSP_POREYAHAT": "BSP_POREYAHAT", "RTSMJD_POREYAHAT": "RTSMJD_POREYAHAT", "BJP_GODDA": "BJP_GODDA", "RJD_GODDA": "RJD_GODDA", "JD_U_GODDA": "JD_U_GODDA", "NOTA_GODDA": "NOTA_GODDA", "JVM_GODDA": "JVM_GODDA", "PECP_GODDA": "PECP_GODDA", "AJSUP_GODDA": "AJSUP_GODDA", "AAAP_GODDA": "AAAP_GODDA", "BSP_GODDA": "BSP_GODDA", "NCP_GODDA": "NCP_GODDA", "Independent_GODDA_1": "Independent_GODDA_1", "AMB_GODDA": "AMB_GODDA", "Independent_GODDA_2": "Independent_GODDA_2", "Independent_GODDA_3": "Independent_GODDA_3", "JRJP_GODDA": "JRJP_GODDA", "INC_MAHAGAMA": "INC_MAHAGAMA", "BJP_MAHAGAMA": "BJP_MAHAGAMA", "AIMIM_MAHAGAMA": "AIMIM_MAHAGAMA", "Independent_MAHAGAMA_1": "Independent_MAHAGAMA_1", "CPM_MAHAGAMA": "CPM_MAHAGAMA", "JVM_MAHAGAMA": "JVM_MAHAGAMA", "AJSUP_MAHAGAMA": "AJSUP_MAHAGAMA", "LJP_MAHAGAMA": "LJP_MAHAGAMA", "Independent_MAHAGAMA_2": "Independent_MAHAGAMA_2", "NOTA_MAHAGAMA": "NOTA_MAHAGAMA", "Independent_MAHAGAMA_3": "Independent_MAHAGAMA_3", "Independent_MAHAGAMA_4": "Independent_MAHAGAMA_4", "NCP_MAHAGAMA": "NCP_MAHAGAMA", "Independent_MAHAGAMA_5": "Independent_MAHAGAMA_5", "JD_U_MAHAGAMA": "JD_U_MAHAGAMA", "BSP_MAHAGAMA": "BSP_MAHAGAMA", "Independent_MAHAGAMA_6": "Independent_MAHAGAMA_6", "BALP_MAHAGAMA": "BALP_MAHAGAMA", "BJP_KODARMA": "BJP_KODARMA", "RJD_KODARMA": "RJD_KODARMA", "AJSUP_KODARMA": "AJSUP_KODARMA", "JVM_KODARMA": "JVM_KODARMA", "Independent_KODARMA_1": "Independent_KODARMA_1", "BSP_KODARMA": "BSP_KODARMA", "Independent_KODARMA_2": "Independent_KODARMA_2", "Independent_KODARMA_3": "Independent_KODARMA_3", "Independent_KODARMA_4": "Independent_KODARMA_4", "NOTA_KODARMA": "NOTA_KODARMA", "Independent_KODARMA_5": "Independent_KODARMA_5", "Independent_KODARMA_6": "Independent_KODARMA_6", "LJP_KODARMA": "LJP_KODARMA", "Independent_KODARMA_7": "Independent_KODARMA_7", "MOSP_KODARMA": "MOSP_KODARMA", "SP_KODARMA": "SP_KODARMA", "AAAP_KODARMA": "AAAP_KODARMA", "PSPL_KODARMA": "PSPL_KODARMA", "Independent_BARKATHA_1": "Independent_BARKATHA_1", "BJP_BARKATHA": "BJP_BARKATHA", "JVM_BARKATHA": "JVM_BARKATHA", "AIMIM_BARKATHA": "AIMIM_BARKATHA", "CPI_BARKATHA": "CPI_BARKATHA", "Independent_BARKATHA_2": "Independent_BARKATHA_2", "RJD_BARKATHA": "RJD_BARKATHA", "AJSUP_BARKATHA": "AJSUP_BARKATHA", "Independent_BARKATHA_3": "Independent_BARKATHA_3", "BALP_BARKATHA": "BALP_BARKATHA", "BSP_BARKATHA": "BSP_BARKATHA", "CPI_ML_L_BARKATHA": "CPI_ML_L_BARKATHA", "Independent_BARKATHA_4": "Independent_BARKATHA_4", "NOTA_BARKATHA": "NOTA_BARKATHA", "Independent_BARKATHA_5": "Independent_BARKATHA_5", "Independent_BARKATHA_6": "Independent_BARKATHA_6", "AAAP_BARKATHA": "AAAP_BARKATHA", "Independent_BARKATHA_7": "Independent_BARKATHA_7", "Independent_BARKATHA_8": "Independent_BARKATHA_8", "Independent_BARKATHA_9": "Independent_BARKATHA_9", "Independent_BARKATHA_10": "Independent_BARKATHA_10", "INC_BARHI": "INC_BARHI", "BJP_BARHI": "BJP_BARHI", "JVM_BARHI": "JVM_BARHI", "Independent_BARHI_1": "Independent_BARHI_1", "Independent_BARHI_2": "Independent_BARHI_2", "CPI_BARHI": "CPI_BARHI", "BSP_BARHI": "BSP_BARHI", "NOTA_BARHI": "NOTA_BARHI", "Independent_BARHI_3": "Independent_BARHI_3", "AITC_BARHI": "AITC_BARHI", "HAMS_BARHI": "HAMS_BARHI", "AAAP_BARHI": "AAAP_BARHI", "Independent_BARHI_4": "Independent_BARHI_4", "RTMP_BARHI": "RTMP_BARHI", "PPID_BARHI": "PPID_BARHI", "INC_BARKAGAON": "INC_BARKAGAON", "AJSUP_BARKAGAON": "AJSUP_BARKAGAON", "BJP_BARKAGAON": "BJP_BARKAGAON", "JVM_BARKAGAON": "JVM_BARKAGAON", "JMM_U_BARKAGAON": "JMM_U_BARKAGAON", "AIMIM_BARKAGAON": "AIMIM_BARKAGAON", "CPI_BARKAGAON": "CPI_BARKAGAON", "JD_U_BARKAGAON": "JD_U_BARKAGAON", "Independent_BARKAGAON_1": "Independent_BARKAGAON_1", "Independent_BARKAGAON_2": "Independent_BARKAGAON_2", "CPI_ML_L_BARKAGAON": "CPI_ML_L_BARKAGAON", "NOTA_BARKAGAON": "NOTA_BARKAGAON", "JKP_BARKAGAON": "JKP_BARKAGAON", "Independent_BARKAGAON_3": "Independent_BARKAGAON_3", "Independent_BARKAGAON_4": "Independent_BARKAGAON_4", "RJBP_BARKAGAON": "RJBP_BARKAGAON", "APoI_BARKAGAON": "APoI_BARKAGAON", "AITC_BARKAGAON": "AITC_BARKAGAON", "JKPS_BARKAGAON": "JKPS_BARKAGAON", "BSP_BARKAGAON": "BSP_BARKAGAON", "PPID_BARKAGAON": "PPID_BARKAGAON", "Independent_BARKAGAON_5": "Independent_BARKAGAON_5", "Independent_BARKAGAON_6": "Independent_BARKAGAON_6", "Independent_BARKAGAON_7": "Independent_BARKAGAON_7", "INC_RAMGARH": "INC_RAMGARH", "AJSUP_RAMGARH": "AJSUP_RAMGARH", "BJP_RAMGARH": "BJP_RAMGARH", "Independent_RAMGARH_1": "Independent_RAMGARH_1", "CPI_RAMGARH": "CPI_RAMGARH", "JD_U_RAMGARH": "JD_U_RAMGARH", "BSP_RAMGARH": "BSP_RAMGARH", "Independent_RAMGARH_2": "Independent_RAMGARH_2", "HSP_RAMGARH": "HSP_RAMGARH", "SHS_RAMGARH": "SHS_RAMGARH", "CPI_ML_L_RAMGARH": "CPI_ML_L_RAMGARH", "APoI_RAMGARH": "APoI_RAMGARH", "NOTA_RAMGARH": "NOTA_RAMGARH", "JVM_RAMGARH": "JVM_RAMGARH", "Independent_RAMGARH_3": "Independent_RAMGARH_3", "RJBP_RAMGARH": "RJBP_RAMGARH", "Independent_RAMGARH_4": "Independent_RAMGARH_4", "JMM_U_RAMGARH": "JMM_U_RAMGARH", "LJP_RAMGARH": "LJP_RAMGARH", "Independent_RAMGARH_5": "Independent_RAMGARH_5", "BHAZS_RAMGARH": "BHAZS_RAMGARH", "Independent_RAMGARH_6": "Independent_RAMGARH_6", "Independent_RAMGARH_7": "Independent_RAMGARH_7", "Independent_RAMGARH_8": "Independent_RAMGARH_8", "Independent_RAMGARH_9": "Independent_RAMGARH_9", "Independent_RAMGARH_10": "Independent_RAMGARH_10", "BJP_MANDHU": "BJP_MANDHU", "AJSUP_MANDHU": "AJSUP_MANDHU", "JMM_MANDHU": "JMM_MANDHU", "Independent_MANDHU_1": "Independent_MANDHU_1", "JVM_MANDHU": "JVM_MANDHU", "AIMIM_MANDHU": "AIMIM_MANDHU", "JD_U_MANDHU": "JD_U_MANDHU", "CPI_ML_L_MANDHU": "CPI_ML_L_MANDHU", "MCO_MANDHU": "MCO_MANDHU", "CPI_MANDHU": "CPI_MANDHU", "BAHUMP_MANDHU": "BAHUMP_MANDHU", "BSP_MANDHU": "BSP_MANDHU", "JMM_U_MANDHU": "JMM_U_MANDHU", "NOTA_MANDHU": "NOTA_MANDHU", "LJP_MANDHU": "LJP_MANDHU", "PSPL_MANDHU": "PSPL_MANDHU", "Independent_MANDHU_2": "Independent_MANDHU_2", "Independent_MANDHU_3": "Independent_MANDHU_3", "PPID_MANDHU": "PPID_MANDHU", "AAAP_MANDHU": "AAAP_MANDHU", "Independent_MANDHU_4": "Independent_MANDHU_4", "IUML_MANDHU": "IUML_MANDHU", "SBSP_MANDHU": "SBSP_MANDHU", "BJP_HAZARIBAGH": "BJP_HAZARIBAGH", "INC_HAZARIBAGH": "INC_HAZARIBAGH", "JVM_HAZARIBAGH": "JVM_HAZARIBAGH", "AIMIM_HAZARIBAGH": "AIMIM_HAZARIBAGH", "Independent_HAZARIBAGH_1": "Independent_HAZARIBAGH_1", "Independent_HAZARIBAGH_2": "Independent_HAZARIBAGH_2", "NOTA_HAZARIBAGH": "NOTA_HAZARIBAGH", "Independent_HAZARIBAGH_3": "Independent_HAZARIBAGH_3", "NCP_HAZARIBAGH": "NCP_HAZARIBAGH", "BSP_HAZARIBAGH": "BSP_HAZARIBAGH", "Independent_HAZARIBAGH_4": "Independent_HAZARIBAGH_4", "Independent_HAZARIBAGH_5": "Independent_HAZARIBAGH_5", "LJP_HAZARIBAGH": "LJP_HAZARIBAGH", "PPID_HAZARIBAGH": "PPID_HAZARIBAGH", "Independent_HAZARIBAGH_6": "Independent_HAZARIBAGH_6", "AIFB_HAZARIBAGH": "AIFB_HAZARIBAGH", "BJP_SIMARIA": "BJP_SIMARIA", "AJSUP_SIMARIA": "AJSUP_SIMARIA", "JVM_SIMARIA": "JVM_SIMARIA", "INC_SIMARIA": "INC_SIMARIA", "Independent_SIMARIA_1": "Independent_SIMARIA_1", "Independent_SIMARIA_2": "Independent_SIMARIA_2", "JKP_SIMARIA": "JKP_SIMARIA", "CPI_SIMARIA": "CPI_SIMARIA", "RPI_A_SIMARIA": "RPI_A_SIMARIA", "BSP_SIMARIA": "BSP_SIMARIA", "SP_SIMARIA": "SP_SIMARIA", "Independent_SIMARIA_3": "Independent_SIMARIA_3", "NOTA_SIMARIA": "NOTA_SIMARIA", "Independent_SIMARIA_4": "Independent_SIMARIA_4", "APoI_SIMARIA": "APoI_SIMARIA", "NAGADHP_SIMARIA": "NAGADHP_SIMARIA", "BaSaPa_SIMARIA": "BaSaPa_SIMARIA", "PPID_SIMARIA": "PPID_SIMARIA", "Independent_SIMARIA_5": "Independent_SIMARIA_5", "RJD_CHATRA": "RJD_CHATRA", "BJP_CHATRA": "BJP_CHATRA", "JD_U_CHATRA": "JD_U_CHATRA", "JVM_CHATRA": "JVM_CHATRA", "NOTA_CHATRA": "NOTA_CHATRA", "BSP_CHATRA": "BSP_CHATRA", "CPM_CHATRA": "CPM_CHATRA", "NAGADHP_CHATRA": "NAGADHP_CHATRA", "Independent_CHATRA_1": "Independent_CHATRA_1", "RJBP_CHATRA": "RJBP_CHATRA", "JVM_DHANWAR": "JVM_DHANWAR", "BJP_DHANWAR": "BJP_DHANWAR", "CPI_ML_L_DHANWAR": "CPI_ML_L_DHANWAR", "Independent_DHANWAR_1": "Independent_DHANWAR_1", "AIMIM_DHANWAR": "AIMIM_DHANWAR", "JMM_DHANWAR": "JMM_DHANWAR", "Independent_DHANWAR_2": "Independent_DHANWAR_2", "Independent_DHANWAR_3": "Independent_DHANWAR_3", "NOTA_DHANWAR": "NOTA_DHANWAR", "BSP_DHANWAR": "BSP_DHANWAR", "Independent_DHANWAR_4": "Independent_DHANWAR_4", "Independent_DHANWAR_5": "Independent_DHANWAR_5", "Independent_DHANWAR_6": "Independent_DHANWAR_6", "SP_DHANWAR": "SP_DHANWAR", "Independent_DHANWAR_7": "Independent_DHANWAR_7", "CPI_ML_L_BAGODAR": "CPI_ML_L_BAGODAR", "BJP_BAGODAR": "BJP_BAGODAR", "JVM_BAGODAR": "JVM_BAGODAR", "AJSUP_BAGODAR": "AJSUP_BAGODAR", "NOTA_BAGODAR": "NOTA_BAGODAR", "Independent_BAGODAR_1": "Independent_BAGODAR_1", "Independent_BAGODAR_2": "Independent_BAGODAR_2", "INC_BAGODAR": "INC_BAGODAR", "AIFB_BAGODAR": "AIFB_BAGODAR", "Independent_BAGODAR_3": "Independent_BAGODAR_3", "Independent_BAGODAR_4": "Independent_BAGODAR_4", "Independent_BAGODAR_5": "Independent_BAGODAR_5", "LJP_BAGODAR": "LJP_BAGODAR", "BJP_JAMUA": "BJP_JAMUA", "INC_JAMUA": "INC_JAMUA", "JVM_JAMUA": "JVM_JAMUA", "CPI_ML_L_JAMUA": "CPI_ML_L_JAMUA", "AJSUP_JAMUA": "AJSUP_JAMUA", "Independent_JAMUA_1": "Independent_JAMUA_1", "NOTA_JAMUA": "NOTA_JAMUA", "LOKJANP_JAMUA": "LOKJANP_JAMUA", "BMUP_JAMUA": "BMUP_JAMUA", "Independent_JAMUA_2": "Independent_JAMUA_2", "JP_JAMUA": "JP_JAMUA", "BSP_JAMUA": "BSP_JAMUA", "AAAP_JAMUA": "AAAP_JAMUA", "LJP_JAMUA": "LJP_JAMUA", "BLSP_JAMUA": "BLSP_JAMUA", "JMM_GANDEY": "JMM_GANDEY", "BJP_GANDEY": "BJP_GANDEY", "AJSUP_GANDEY": "AJSUP_GANDEY", "Independent_GANDEY_1": "Independent_GANDEY_1", "Independent_GANDEY_2": "Independent_GANDEY_2", "JVM_GANDEY": "JVM_GANDEY", "CPI_ML_L_GANDEY": "CPI_ML_L_GANDEY", "AIMIM_GANDEY": "AIMIM_GANDEY", "NOTA_GANDEY": "NOTA_GANDEY", "Independent_GANDEY_3": "Independent_GANDEY_3", "Independent_GANDEY_4": "Independent_GANDEY_4", "BSP_GANDEY": "BSP_GANDEY", "SHS_GANDEY": "SHS_GANDEY", "JMM_GIRIDIH": "JMM_GIRIDIH", "BJP_GIRIDIH": "BJP_GIRIDIH", "JVM_GIRIDIH": "JVM_GIRIDIH", "NOTA_GIRIDIH": "NOTA_GIRIDIH", "Independent_GIRIDIH_1": "Independent_GIRIDIH_1", "LJP_GIRIDIH": "LJP_GIRIDIH", "Independent_GIRIDIH_2": "Independent_GIRIDIH_2", "BSP_GIRIDIH": "BSP_GIRIDIH", "AAAP_GIRIDIH": "AAAP_GIRIDIH", "MCO_GIRIDIH": "MCO_GIRIDIH", "Independent_GIRIDIH_3": "Independent_GIRIDIH_3", "CPI_ML_L_GIRIDIH": "CPI_ML_L_GIRIDIH", "AITC_GIRIDIH": "AITC_GIRIDIH", "JMM_DUMRI": "JMM_DUMRI", "AJSUP_DUMRI": "AJSUP_DUMRI", "BJP_DUMRI": "BJP_DUMRI", "AIMIM_DUMRI": "AIMIM_DUMRI", "JD_U_DUMRI": "JD_U_DUMRI", "CPI_DUMRI": "CPI_DUMRI", "Independent_DUMRI_1": "Independent_DUMRI_1", "NOTA_DUMRI": "NOTA_DUMRI", "BSP_DUMRI": "BSP_DUMRI", "SHS_DUMRI": "SHS_DUMRI", "AAAP_DUMRI": "AAAP_DUMRI", "JVM_DUMRI": "JVM_DUMRI", "Independent_DUMRI_2": "Independent_DUMRI_2", "BALP_DUMRI": "BALP_DUMRI", "PSPL_DUMRI": "PSPL_DUMRI", "JMM_U_DUMRI": "JMM_U_DUMRI", "AJSUP_GOMIYA": "AJSUP_GOMIYA", "JMM_GOMIYA": "JMM_GOMIYA", "Independent_GOMIYA_1": "Independent_GOMIYA_1", "BJP_GOMIYA": "BJP_GOMIYA", "Independent_GOMIYA_2": "Independent_GOMIYA_2", "Independent_GOMIYA_3": "Independent_GOMIYA_3", "NOTA_GOMIYA": "NOTA_GOMIYA", "Independent_GOMIYA_4": "Independent_GOMIYA_4", "JVM_GOMIYA": "JVM_GOMIYA", "BSP_GOMIYA": "BSP_GOMIYA", "Independent_GOMIYA_5": "Independent_GOMIYA_5", "IUML_GOMIYA": "IUML_GOMIYA", "JD_U_GOMIYA": "JD_U_GOMIYA", "PPID_GOMIYA": "PPID_GOMIYA", "LJP_GOMIYA": "LJP_GOMIYA", "JMM_U_GOMIYA": "JMM_U_GOMIYA", "INC_BERMO": "INC_BERMO", "BJP_BERMO": "BJP_BERMO", "AJSUP_BERMO": "AJSUP_BERMO", "CPI_BERMO": "CPI_BERMO", "JVM_BERMO": "JVM_BERMO", "JKPS_BERMO": "JKPS_BERMO", "Independent_BERMO_1": "Independent_BERMO_1", "Independent_BERMO_2": "Independent_BERMO_2", "Independent_BERMO_3": "Independent_BERMO_3", "NOTA_BERMO": "NOTA_BERMO", "Independent_BERMO_4": "Independent_BERMO_4", "SHS_BERMO": "SHS_BERMO", "Independent_BERMO_5": "Independent_BERMO_5", "Independent_BERMO_6": "Independent_BERMO_6", "JMM_U_BERMO": "JMM_U_BERMO", "AMB_BERMO": "AMB_BERMO", "BSP_BERMO": "BSP_BERMO", "Independent_BERMO_7": "Independent_BERMO_7", "LJP_BERMO": "LJP_BERMO", "PPID_BERMO": "PPID_BERMO", "RPI_A_BERMO": "RPI_A_BERMO", "BJP_BOKARO": "BJP_BOKARO", "INC_BOKARO": "INC_BOKARO", "AJSUP_BOKARO": "AJSUP_BOKARO", "JVM_BOKARO": "JVM_BOKARO", "AIMIM_BOKARO": "AIMIM_BOKARO", "Independent_BOKARO_1": "Independent_BOKARO_1", "NOTA_BOKARO": "NOTA_BOKARO", "Independent_BOKARO_2": "Independent_BOKARO_2", "JD_S_BOKARO": "JD_S_BOKARO", "AAAP_BOKARO": "AAAP_BOKARO", "Independent_BOKARO_3": "Independent_BOKARO_3", "Independent_BOKARO_4": "Independent_BOKARO_4", "APoI_BOKARO": "APoI_BOKARO", "AITC_BOKARO": "AITC_BOKARO", "HAMS_BOKARO": "HAMS_BOKARO", "JP_BOKARO": "JP_BOKARO", "Independent_BOKARO_5": "Independent_BOKARO_5", "Independent_BOKARO_6": "Independent_BOKARO_6", "Independent_BOKARO_7": "Independent_BOKARO_7", "SWARAJ_BOKARO": "SWARAJ_BOKARO", "SUCI_C_BOKARO": "SUCI_C_BOKARO", "Independent_BOKARO_8": "Independent_BOKARO_8", "Independent_BOKARO_9": "Independent_BOKARO_9", "Independent_BOKARO_10": "Independent_BOKARO_10", "PPID_BOKARO": "PPID_BOKARO", "Independent_BOKARO_11": "Independent_BOKARO_11", "BJP_CHANDANKYARI": "BJP_CHANDANKYARI", "AJSUP_CHANDANKYARI": "AJSUP_CHANDANKYARI", "JMM_CHANDANKYARI": "JMM_CHANDANKYARI", "NOTA_CHANDANKYARI": "NOTA_CHANDANKYARI", "Independent_CHANDANKYARI_1": "Independent_CHANDANKYARI_1", "Independent_CHANDANKYARI_2": "Independent_CHANDANKYARI_2", "JVM_CHANDANKYARI": "JVM_CHANDANKYARI", "MCO_CHANDANKYARI": "MCO_CHANDANKYARI", "APoI_CHANDANKYARI": "APoI_CHANDANKYARI", "AITC_CHANDANKYARI": "AITC_CHANDANKYARI", "PPID_CHANDANKYARI": "PPID_CHANDANKYARI", "JKP_CHANDANKYARI": "JKP_CHANDANKYARI", "SUCI_C_CHANDANKYARI": "SUCI_C_CHANDANKYARI", "AMB_CHANDANKYARI": "AMB_CHANDANKYARI", "BSP_CHANDANKYARI": "BSP_CHANDANKYARI", "AIFB_CHANDANKYARI": "AIFB_CHANDANKYARI", "BJP_SINDRI": "BJP_SINDRI", "MCO_SINDRI": "MCO_SINDRI", "JMM_SINDRI": "JMM_SINDRI", "AJSUP_SINDRI": "AJSUP_SINDRI", "JVM_SINDRI": "JVM_SINDRI", "AAAP_SINDRI": "AAAP_SINDRI", "Independent_SINDRI_1": "Independent_SINDRI_1", "LJP_SINDRI": "LJP_SINDRI", "BSP_SINDRI": "BSP_SINDRI", "NOTA_SINDRI": "NOTA_SINDRI", "Independent_SINDRI_2": "Independent_SINDRI_2", "Independent_SINDRI_3": "Independent_SINDRI_3", "SP_SINDRI": "SP_SINDRI", "AITC_SINDRI": "AITC_SINDRI", "SHS_SINDRI": "SHS_SINDRI", "Independent_SINDRI_4": "Independent_SINDRI_4", "AIFB_SINDRI": "AIFB_SINDRI", "BJP_NIRSA": "BJP_NIRSA", "MCO_NIRSA": "MCO_NIRSA", "JMM_NIRSA": "JMM_NIRSA", "NOTA_NIRSA": "NOTA_NIRSA", "JVM_NIRSA": "JVM_NIRSA", "Independent_NIRSA_1": "Independent_NIRSA_1", "BSP_NIRSA": "BSP_NIRSA", "AIFB_NIRSA": "AIFB_NIRSA", "NCP_NIRSA": "NCP_NIRSA", "BJP_DHANBAD": "BJP_DHANBAD", "INC_DHANBAD": "INC_DHANBAD", "Independent_DHANBAD_1": "Independent_DHANBAD_1", "LJP_DHANBAD": "LJP_DHANBAD", "JD_U_DHANBAD": "JD_U_DHANBAD", "AJSUP_DHANBAD": "AJSUP_DHANBAD", "NOTA_DHANBAD": "NOTA_DHANBAD", "JVM_DHANBAD": "JVM_DHANBAD", "BSP_DHANBAD": "BSP_DHANBAD", "CPI_ML_L_DHANBAD": "CPI_ML_L_DHANBAD", "Independent_DHANBAD_2": "Independent_DHANBAD_2", "Independent_DHANBAD_3": "Independent_DHANBAD_3", "AAAP_DHANBAD": "AAAP_DHANBAD", "Independent_DHANBAD_4": "Independent_DHANBAD_4", "MCO_DHANBAD": "MCO_DHANBAD", "JMM_U_DHANBAD": "JMM_U_DHANBAD", "HAMS_DHANBAD": "HAMS_DHANBAD", "Independent_DHANBAD_5": "Independent_DHANBAD_5", "SP_DHANBAD": "SP_DHANBAD", "PPID_DHANBAD": "PPID_DHANBAD", "Independent_DHANBAD_6": "Independent_DHANBAD_6", "BDlP_DHANBAD": "BDlP_DHANBAD", "Independent_DHANBAD_7": "Independent_DHANBAD_7", "INC_JHARIA": "INC_JHARIA", "BJP_JHARIA": "BJP_JHARIA", "JVM_JHARIA": "JVM_JHARIA", "AJSUP_JHARIA": "AJSUP_JHARIA", "Independent_JHARIA_1": "Independent_JHARIA_1", "HAMS_JHARIA": "HAMS_JHARIA", "JSVP_JHARIA": "JSVP_JHARIA", "NOTA_JHARIA": "NOTA_JHARIA", "BSP_JHARIA": "BSP_JHARIA", "Independent_JHARIA_2": "Independent_JHARIA_2", "RUC_JHARIA": "RUC_JHARIA", "APoI_JHARIA": "APoI_JHARIA", "Independent_JHARIA_3": "Independent_JHARIA_3", "AITC_JHARIA": "AITC_JHARIA", "LJP_JHARIA": "LJP_JHARIA", "SP_JHARIA": "SP_JHARIA", "Independent_JHARIA_4": "Independent_JHARIA_4", "Independent_JHARIA_5": "Independent_JHARIA_5", "JMM_TUNDI": "JMM_TUNDI", "BJP_TUNDI": "BJP_TUNDI", "JVM_TUNDI": "JVM_TUNDI", "AJSUP_TUNDI": "AJSUP_TUNDI", "AAAP_TUNDI": "AAAP_TUNDI", "Independent_TUNDI_1": "Independent_TUNDI_1", "JD_U_TUNDI": "JD_U_TUNDI", "BSP_TUNDI": "BSP_TUNDI", "NOTA_TUNDI": "NOTA_TUNDI", "Independent_TUNDI_2": "Independent_TUNDI_2", "Independent_TUNDI_3": "Independent_TUNDI_3", "Independent_TUNDI_4": "Independent_TUNDI_4", "CPI_TUNDI": "CPI_TUNDI", "AIFB_TUNDI": "AIFB_TUNDI", "BJP_BAGHMARA": "BJP_BAGHMARA", "INC_BAGHMARA": "INC_BAGHMARA", "JD_U_BAGHMARA": "JD_U_BAGHMARA", "Independent_BAGHMARA_1": "Independent_BAGHMARA_1", "JVM_BAGHMARA": "JVM_BAGHMARA", "BSP_BAGHMARA": "BSP_BAGHMARA", "Independent_BAGHMARA_2": "Independent_BAGHMARA_2", "Independent_BAGHMARA_3": "Independent_BAGHMARA_3", "NOTA_BAGHMARA": "NOTA_BAGHMARA", "Independent_BAGHMARA_4": "Independent_BAGHMARA_4", "HAMS_BAGHMARA": "HAMS_BAGHMARA", "Independent_BAGHMARA_5": "Independent_BAGHMARA_5", "AAAP_BAGHMARA": "AAAP_BAGHMARA", "Independent_BAGHMARA_6": "Independent_BAGHMARA_6", "Independent_BAGHMARA_7": "Independent_BAGHMARA_7", "SP_BAGHMARA": "SP_BAGHMARA", "JMM_BAHARAGORA": "JMM_BAHARAGORA", "BJP_BAHARAGORA": "BJP_BAHARAGORA", "CPM_BAHARAGORA": "CPM_BAHARAGORA", "CPI_BAHARAGORA": "CPI_BAHARAGORA", "Independent_BAHARAGORA_1": "Independent_BAHARAGORA_1", "NOTA_BAHARAGORA": "NOTA_BAHARAGORA", "JVM_BAHARAGORA": "JVM_BAHARAGORA", "Independent_BAHARAGORA_2": "Independent_BAHARAGORA_2", "Independent_BAHARAGORA_3": "Independent_BAHARAGORA_3", "APoI_BAHARAGORA": "APoI_BAHARAGORA", "AITC_BAHARAGORA": "AITC_BAHARAGORA", "Independent_BAHARAGORA_4": "Independent_BAHARAGORA_4", "Independent_BAHARAGORA_5": "Independent_BAHARAGORA_5", "SUCI_C_BAHARAGORA": "SUCI_C_BAHARAGORA", "AMB_BAHARAGORA": "AMB_BAHARAGORA", "JMM_GHATSHILA": "JMM_GHATSHILA", "BJP_GHATSHILA": "BJP_GHATSHILA", "AJSUP_GHATSHILA": "AJSUP_GHATSHILA", "Independent_GHATSHILA_1": "Independent_GHATSHILA_1", "JKPP_GHATSHILA": "JKPP_GHATSHILA", "CPI_GHATSHILA": "CPI_GHATSHILA", "JVM_GHATSHILA": "JVM_GHATSHILA", "JD_U_GHATSHILA": "JD_U_GHATSHILA", "Independent_GHATSHILA_2": "Independent_GHATSHILA_2", "Independent_GHATSHILA_3": "Independent_GHATSHILA_3", "Independent_GHATSHILA_4": "Independent_GHATSHILA_4", "Independent_GHATSHILA_5": "Independent_GHATSHILA_5", "Independent_GHATSHILA_6": "Independent_GHATSHILA_6", "NOTA_GHATSHILA": "NOTA_GHATSHILA", "Independent_GHATSHILA_7": "Independent_GHATSHILA_7", "SUCI_C_GHATSHILA": "SUCI_C_GHATSHILA", "BHAZS_GHATSHILA": "BHAZS_GHATSHILA", "JMM_POTKA": "JMM_POTKA", "BJP_POTKA": "BJP_POTKA", "AJSUP_POTKA": "AJSUP_POTKA", "JVM_POTKA": "JVM_POTKA", "NOTA_POTKA": "NOTA_POTKA", "JD_U_POTKA": "JD_U_POTKA", "RTORP_POTKA": "RTORP_POTKA", "Independent_POTKA_1": "Independent_POTKA_1", "SUCI_C_POTKA": "SUCI_C_POTKA", "Independent_POTKA_2": "Independent_POTKA_2", "JKPP_POTKA": "JKPP_POTKA", "JMM_JUGASHLAI": "JMM_JUGASHLAI", "BJP_JUGASHLAI": "BJP_JUGASHLAI", "AJSUP_JUGASHLAI": "AJSUP_JUGASHLAI", "NOTA_JUGASHLAI": "NOTA_JUGASHLAI", "JVM_JUGASHLAI": "JVM_JUGASHLAI", "APoI_JUGASHLAI": "APoI_JUGASHLAI", "Independent_JUGASHLAI_1": "Independent_JUGASHLAI_1", "SHS_JUGASHLAI": "SHS_JUGASHLAI", "PPID_JUGASHLAI": "PPID_JUGASHLAI", "BSP_JUGASHLAI": "BSP_JUGASHLAI", "AMB_JUGASHLAI": "AMB_JUGASHLAI", "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST_1": "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST_1", "BJP_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST": "BJP_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST", "INC_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST": "INC_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST", "JVM_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST": "JVM_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST", "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST_2": "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST_2", "NOTA_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST": "NOTA_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST", "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST_3": "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST_3", "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST_4": "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST_4", "BSP_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST": "BSP_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST", "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST_5": "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST_5", "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST_6": "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST_6", "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST_7": "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST_7", "APoI_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST": "APoI_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST", "RJBP_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST": "RJBP_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST", "YKP_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST": "YKP_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST", "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST_8": "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST_8", "RADP_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST": "RADP_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST", "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST_9": "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST_9", "AMB_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST": "AMB_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST", "RTORP_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST": "RTORP_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST", "SHS_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST": "SHS_JAMSHEDPUR_EAST", "INC_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST": "INC_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST", "BJP_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST": "BJP_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST", "AIMIM_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST": "AIMIM_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST", "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST_1": "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST_1", "AAAP_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST": "AAAP_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST", "NOTA_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST": "NOTA_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST", "AJSUP_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST": "AJSUP_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST", "JVM_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST": "JVM_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST", "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST_2": "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST_2", "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST_3": "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST_3", "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST_4": "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST_4", "APoI_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST": "APoI_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST", "AITC_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST": "AITC_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST", "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST_5": "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST_5", "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST_6": "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST_6", "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST_7": "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST_7", "RTORP_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST": "RTORP_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST", "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST_8": "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST_8", "IUML_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST": "IUML_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST", "AHNP_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST": "AHNP_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST", "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST_9": "Independent_JAMSHEDPUR_WEST_9", "JMM_ICHAGARH": "JMM_ICHAGARH", "AJSUP_ICHAGARH": "AJSUP_ICHAGARH", "BJP_ICHAGARH": "BJP_ICHAGARH", "Independent_ICHAGARH_1": "Independent_ICHAGARH_1", "Independent_ICHAGARH_2": "Independent_ICHAGARH_2", "Independent_ICHAGARH_3": "Independent_ICHAGARH_3", "LJP_ICHAGARH": "LJP_ICHAGARH", "JVM_ICHAGARH": "JVM_ICHAGARH", "Independent_ICHAGARH_4": "Independent_ICHAGARH_4", "PSPL_ICHAGARH": "PSPL_ICHAGARH", "Independent_ICHAGARH_5": "Independent_ICHAGARH_5", "AMB_ICHAGARH": "AMB_ICHAGARH", "RPI_A_ICHAGARH": "RPI_A_ICHAGARH", "JKP_N_ICHAGARH": "JKP_N_ICHAGARH", "Independent_ICHAGARH_6": "Independent_ICHAGARH_6", "Independent_ICHAGARH_7": "Independent_ICHAGARH_7", "NOTA_ICHAGARH": "NOTA_ICHAGARH", "JD_U_ICHAGARH": "JD_U_ICHAGARH", "Independent_ICHAGARH_8": "Independent_ICHAGARH_8", "SUCI_C_ICHAGARH": "SUCI_C_ICHAGARH", "Independent_ICHAGARH_9": "Independent_ICHAGARH_9", "BSP_ICHAGARH": "BSP_ICHAGARH", "APoI_ICHAGARH": "APoI_ICHAGARH", "SHS_ICHAGARH": "SHS_ICHAGARH", "Independent_ICHAGARH_10": "Independent_ICHAGARH_10", "NAGADHP_ICHAGARH": "NAGADHP_ICHAGARH", "AIFB_ICHAGARH": "AIFB_ICHAGARH", "Independent_ICHAGARH_11": "Independent_ICHAGARH_11", "Independent_ICHAGARH_12": "Independent_ICHAGARH_12", "RAIM_ICHAGARH": "RAIM_ICHAGARH", "AHNP_ICHAGARH": "AHNP_ICHAGARH", "BHAZS_ICHAGARH": "BHAZS_ICHAGARH", "JMM_SARAIKELLA": "JMM_SARAIKELLA", "BJP_SARAIKELLA": "BJP_SARAIKELLA", "AJSUP_SARAIKELLA": "AJSUP_SARAIKELLA", "NOTA_SARAIKELLA": "NOTA_SARAIKELLA", "BSP_SARAIKELLA": "BSP_SARAIKELLA", "APoI_SARAIKELLA": "APoI_SARAIKELLA", "JVM_SARAIKELLA": "JVM_SARAIKELLA", "JD_U_SARAIKELLA": "JD_U_SARAIKELLA", "JMM_CHAIBASA": "JMM_CHAIBASA", "BJP_CHAIBASA": "BJP_CHAIBASA", "JVM_CHAIBASA": "JVM_CHAIBASA", "Independent_CHAIBASA_1": "Independent_CHAIBASA_1", "NOTA_CHAIBASA": "NOTA_CHAIBASA", "AITC_CHAIBASA": "AITC_CHAIBASA", "JD_U_CHAIBASA": "JD_U_CHAIBASA", "Independent_CHAIBASA_2": "Independent_CHAIBASA_2", "BSP_CHAIBASA": "BSP_CHAIBASA", "Independent_CHAIBASA_3": "Independent_CHAIBASA_3", "BHAZS_CHAIBASA": "BHAZS_CHAIBASA", "APoI_CHAIBASA": "APoI_CHAIBASA", "SUCI_C_CHAIBASA": "SUCI_C_CHAIBASA", "AAAP_CHAIBASA": "AAAP_CHAIBASA", "JMM_MAJHGANON": "JMM_MAJHGANON", "BJP_MAJHGANON": "BJP_MAJHGANON", "BHAZS_MAJHGANON": "BHAZS_MAJHGANON", "AJSUP_MAJHGANON": "AJSUP_MAJHGANON", "Independent_MAJHGANON_1": "Independent_MAJHGANON_1", "JVM_MAJHGANON": "JVM_MAJHGANON", "Independent_MAJHGANON_2": "Independent_MAJHGANON_2", "Independent_MAJHGANON_3": "Independent_MAJHGANON_3", "JD_U_MAJHGANON": "JD_U_MAJHGANON", "Independent_MAJHGANON_4": "Independent_MAJHGANON_4", "BSP_MAJHGANON": "BSP_MAJHGANON", "AAAP_MAJHGANON": "AAAP_MAJHGANON", "JKP_MAJHGANON": "JKP_MAJHGANON", "APoI_MAJHGANON": "APoI_MAJHGANON", "JKPP_MAJHGANON": "JKPP_MAJHGANON", "NOTA_MAJHGANON": "NOTA_MAJHGANON", "JMM_U_MAJHGANON": "JMM_U_MAJHGANON", "INC_JAGANATHPUR": "INC_JAGANATHPUR", "JVM_JAGANATHPUR": "JVM_JAGANATHPUR", "BJP_JAGANATHPUR": "BJP_JAGANATHPUR", "AJSUP_JAGANATHPUR": "AJSUP_JAGANATHPUR", "Independent_JAGANATHPUR_1": "Independent_JAGANATHPUR_1", "AITC_JAGANATHPUR": "AITC_JAGANATHPUR", "Independent_JAGANATHPUR_2": "Independent_JAGANATHPUR_2", "NOTA_JAGANATHPUR": "NOTA_JAGANATHPUR", "Independent_JAGANATHPUR_3": "Independent_JAGANATHPUR_3", "Independent_JAGANATHPUR_4": "Independent_JAGANATHPUR_4", "APoI_JAGANATHPUR": "APoI_JAGANATHPUR", "RPI_A_JAGANATHPUR": "RPI_A_JAGANATHPUR", "BSP_JAGANATHPUR": "BSP_JAGANATHPUR", "Independent_JAGANATHPUR_5": "Independent_JAGANATHPUR_5", "JMM_MANOHARPUR": "JMM_MANOHARPUR", "BJP_MANOHARPUR": "BJP_MANOHARPUR", "AJSUP_MANOHARPUR": "AJSUP_MANOHARPUR", "NOTA_MANOHARPUR": "NOTA_MANOHARPUR", "JVM_MANOHARPUR": "JVM_MANOHARPUR", "APoI_MANOHARPUR": "APoI_MANOHARPUR", "JKP_MANOHARPUR": "JKP_MANOHARPUR", "JD_U_MANOHARPUR": "JD_U_MANOHARPUR", "BHAZS_MANOHARPUR": "BHAZS_MANOHARPUR", "BSP_MANOHARPUR": "BSP_MANOHARPUR", "SUCI_C_MANOHARPUR": "SUCI_C_MANOHARPUR", "BTP_MANOHARPUR": "BTP_MANOHARPUR", "AAAP_MANOHARPUR": "AAAP_MANOHARPUR", "SHS_MANOHARPUR": "SHS_MANOHARPUR", "HBP_MANOHARPUR": "HBP_MANOHARPUR", "JMM_CHAKRADHARPUR": "JMM_CHAKRADHARPUR", "BJP_CHAKRADHARPUR": "BJP_CHAKRADHARPUR", "JVM_CHAKRADHARPUR": "JVM_CHAKRADHARPUR", "AJSUP_CHAKRADHARPUR": "AJSUP_CHAKRADHARPUR", "NOTA_CHAKRADHARPUR": "NOTA_CHAKRADHARPUR", "APoI_CHAKRADHARPUR": "APoI_CHAKRADHARPUR", "Independent_CHAKRADHARPUR_1": "Independent_CHAKRADHARPUR_1", "JKP_CHAKRADHARPUR": "JKP_CHAKRADHARPUR", "Independent_CHAKRADHARPUR_2": "Independent_CHAKRADHARPUR_2", "BSP_CHAKRADHARPUR": "BSP_CHAKRADHARPUR", "Independent_CHAKRADHARPUR_3": "Independent_CHAKRADHARPUR_3", "Independent_CHAKRADHARPUR_4": "Independent_CHAKRADHARPUR_4", "JP_CHAKRADHARPUR": "JP_CHAKRADHARPUR", "JMM_KHARASAWAN": "JMM_KHARASAWAN", "BJP_KHARASAWAN": "BJP_KHARASAWAN", "AJSUP_KHARASAWAN": "AJSUP_KHARASAWAN", "JVM_KHARASAWAN": "JVM_KHARASAWAN", "Independent_KHARASAWAN_1": "Independent_KHARASAWAN_1", "Independent_KHARASAWAN_2": "Independent_KHARASAWAN_2", "JD_U_KHARASAWAN": "JD_U_KHARASAWAN", "NOTA_KHARASAWAN": "NOTA_KHARASAWAN", "Independent_KHARASAWAN_3": "Independent_KHARASAWAN_3", "Independent_KHARASAWAN_4": "Independent_KHARASAWAN_4", "BSP_KHARASAWAN": "BSP_KHARASAWAN", "JKP_KHARASAWAN": "JKP_KHARASAWAN", "Independent_KHARASAWAN_5": "Independent_KHARASAWAN_5", "Independent_KHARASAWAN_6": "Independent_KHARASAWAN_6", "JP_KHARASAWAN": "JP_KHARASAWAN", "PPID_KHARASAWAN": "PPID_KHARASAWAN", "AMB_KHARASAWAN": "AMB_KHARASAWAN", "JMM_TAMAR": "JMM_TAMAR", "AJSUP_TAMAR": "AJSUP_TAMAR", "BJP_TAMAR": "BJP_TAMAR", "NCP_TAMAR": "NCP_TAMAR", "JVM_TAMAR": "JVM_TAMAR", "Independent_TAMAR_1": "Independent_TAMAR_1", "JKP_TAMAR": "JKP_TAMAR", "Independent_TAMAR_2": "Independent_TAMAR_2", "AITC_TAMAR": "AITC_TAMAR", "JD_U_TAMAR": "JD_U_TAMAR", "JKPS_TAMAR": "JKPS_TAMAR", "BSP_TAMAR": "BSP_TAMAR", "Independent_TAMAR_3": "Independent_TAMAR_3", "APoI_TAMAR": "APoI_TAMAR", "RTMP_TAMAR": "RTMP_TAMAR", "Independent_TAMAR_4": "Independent_TAMAR_4", "NOTA_TAMAR": "NOTA_TAMAR", "Independent_TAMAR_5": "Independent_TAMAR_5", "BJP_TORPA": "BJP_TORPA", "JMM_TORPA": "JMM_TORPA", "Independent_TORPA_1": "Independent_TORPA_1", "JKP_TORPA": "JKP_TORPA", "JVM_TORPA": "JVM_TORPA", "JD_U_TORPA": "JD_U_TORPA", "NOTA_TORPA": "NOTA_TORPA", "Independent_TORPA_2": "Independent_TORPA_2", "LJP_TORPA": "LJP_TORPA", "BJP_KHUNTI": "BJP_KHUNTI", "JMM_KHUNTI": "JMM_KHUNTI", "JVM_KHUNTI": "JVM_KHUNTI", "Independent_KHUNTI_1": "Independent_KHUNTI_1", "NOTA_KHUNTI": "NOTA_KHUNTI", "Independent_KHUNTI_2": "Independent_KHUNTI_2", "BTP_KHUNTI": "BTP_KHUNTI", "BSP_KHUNTI": "BSP_KHUNTI", "JKP_KHUNTI": "JKP_KHUNTI", "APoI_KHUNTI": "APoI_KHUNTI", "JD_U_KHUNTI": "JD_U_KHUNTI", "AKBJHP_KHUNTI": "AKBJHP_KHUNTI", "AJSUP_SILLI": "AJSUP_SILLI", "JMM_SILLI": "JMM_SILLI", "CPM_SILLI": "CPM_SILLI", "Independent_SILLI_1": "Independent_SILLI_1", "Independent_SILLI_2": "Independent_SILLI_2", "NOTA_SILLI": "NOTA_SILLI", "PPID_SILLI": "PPID_SILLI", "JVM_SILLI": "JVM_SILLI", "PBI_SILLI": "PBI_SILLI", "Independent_SILLI_3": "Independent_SILLI_3", "PSS_SILLI": "PSS_SILLI", "JKP_SILLI": "JKP_SILLI", "Independent_SILLI_4": "Independent_SILLI_4", "BSP_SILLI": "BSP_SILLI", "SWRP_SILLI": "SWRP_SILLI", "RPI_A_SILLI": "RPI_A_SILLI", "INC_KHIJRI": "INC_KHIJRI", "BJP_KHIJRI": "BJP_KHIJRI", "AJSUP_KHIJRI": "AJSUP_KHIJRI", "JVM_KHIJRI": "JVM_KHIJRI", "Independent_KHIJRI_1": "Independent_KHIJRI_1", "NOTA_KHIJRI": "NOTA_KHIJRI", "CPM_KHIJRI": "CPM_KHIJRI", "JKP_KHIJRI": "JKP_KHIJRI", "LJVM_KHIJRI": "LJVM_KHIJRI", "APoI_KHIJRI": "APoI_KHIJRI", "RTMP_KHIJRI": "RTMP_KHIJRI", "CPI_ML_L_KHIJRI": "CPI_ML_L_KHIJRI", "RPI_A_KHIJRI": "RPI_A_KHIJRI", "NAGADHP_KHIJRI": "NAGADHP_KHIJRI", "PPID_KHIJRI": "PPID_KHIJRI", "BJP_RANCHI": "BJP_RANCHI", "JMM_RANCHI": "JMM_RANCHI", "Independent_RANCHI_1": "Independent_RANCHI_1", "AJSUP_RANCHI": "AJSUP_RANCHI", "JVM_RANCHI": "JVM_RANCHI", "NOTA_RANCHI": "NOTA_RANCHI", "JD_U_RANCHI": "JD_U_RANCHI", "AAAP_RANCHI": "AAAP_RANCHI", "Independent_RANCHI_2": "Independent_RANCHI_2", "AITC_RANCHI": "AITC_RANCHI", "BSP_RANCHI": "BSP_RANCHI", "LJP_RANCHI": "LJP_RANCHI", "RTMP_RANCHI": "RTMP_RANCHI", "BJP_HATIA": "BJP_HATIA", "INC_HATIA": "INC_HATIA", "CPM_HATIA": "CPM_HATIA", "AJSUP_HATIA": "AJSUP_HATIA", "JVM_HATIA": "JVM_HATIA", "NOTA_HATIA": "NOTA_HATIA", "Independent_HATIA_1": "Independent_HATIA_1", "Independent_HATIA_2": "Independent_HATIA_2", "Independent_HATIA_3": "Independent_HATIA_3", "NAGADHP_HATIA": "NAGADHP_HATIA", "JD_U_HATIA": "JD_U_HATIA", "SUCI_C_HATIA": "SUCI_C_HATIA", "Independent_HATIA_4": "Independent_HATIA_4", "AAAP_HATIA": "AAAP_HATIA", "PPID_HATIA": "PPID_HATIA", "SVKP_HATIA": "SVKP_HATIA", "IUML_HATIA": "IUML_HATIA", "Independent_HATIA_5": "Independent_HATIA_5", "Independent_HATIA_6": "Independent_HATIA_6", "Independent_HATIA_7": "Independent_HATIA_7", "Independent_HATIA_8": "Independent_HATIA_8", "JMM_U_HATIA": "JMM_U_HATIA", "SP_HATIA": "SP_HATIA", "BJP_KANKE": "BJP_KANKE", "INC_KANKE": "INC_KANKE", "AJSUP_KANKE": "AJSUP_KANKE", "JVM_KANKE": "JVM_KANKE", "NOTA_KANKE": "NOTA_KANKE", "JD_U_KANKE": "JD_U_KANKE", "LJP_KANKE": "LJP_KANKE", "RTJHPR_KANKE": "RTJHPR_KANKE", "PPID_KANKE": "PPID_KANKE", "BSP_KANKE": "BSP_KANKE", "LJVM_KANKE": "LJVM_KANKE", "RRP_KANKE": "RRP_KANKE", "CPIM_KANKE": "CPIM_KANKE", "JVM_MANDAR": "JVM_MANDAR", "BJP_MANDAR": "BJP_MANDAR", "AIMIM_MANDAR": "AIMIM_MANDAR", "AJSUP_MANDAR": "AJSUP_MANDAR", "INC_MANDAR": "INC_MANDAR", "NOTA_MANDAR": "NOTA_MANDAR", "Independent_MANDAR_1": "Independent_MANDAR_1", "AITC_MANDAR": "AITC_MANDAR", "BSP_MANDAR": "BSP_MANDAR", "SHS_MANDAR": "SHS_MANDAR", "PPID_MANDAR": "PPID_MANDAR", "Independent_MANDAR_2": "Independent_MANDAR_2", "LJVM_MANDAR": "LJVM_MANDAR", "RTMP_MANDAR": "RTMP_MANDAR", "JMM_SISAI": "JMM_SISAI", "BJP_SISAI": "BJP_SISAI", "NOTA_SISAI": "NOTA_SISAI", "JVM_SISAI": "JVM_SISAI", "Independent_SISAI_1": "Independent_SISAI_1", "JKP_SISAI": "JKP_SISAI", "Independent_SISAI_2": "Independent_SISAI_2", "RADP_SISAI": "RADP_SISAI", "NAGADHP_SISAI": "NAGADHP_SISAI", "BSP_SISAI": "BSP_SISAI", "RTMP_SISAI": "RTMP_SISAI", "JMM_GUMLA": "JMM_GUMLA", "BJP_GUMLA": "BJP_GUMLA", "NOTA_GUMLA": "NOTA_GUMLA", "JVM_GUMLA": "JVM_GUMLA", "CPI_GUMLA": "CPI_GUMLA", "Independent_GUMLA_1": "Independent_GUMLA_1", "RADP_GUMLA": "RADP_GUMLA", "JKP_GUMLA": "JKP_GUMLA", "Independent_GUMLA_2": "Independent_GUMLA_2", "Independent_GUMLA_3": "Independent_GUMLA_3", "BTP_GUMLA": "BTP_GUMLA", "JD_U_GUMLA": "JD_U_GUMLA", "JAC_GUMLA": "JAC_GUMLA", "JMM_BISHUNPUR": "JMM_BISHUNPUR", "BJP_BISHUNPUR": "BJP_BISHUNPUR", "JVM_BISHUNPUR": "JVM_BISHUNPUR", "NOTA_BISHUNPUR": "NOTA_BISHUNPUR", "Independent_BISHUNPUR_1": "Independent_BISHUNPUR_1", "Independent_BISHUNPUR_2": "Independent_BISHUNPUR_2", "Independent_BISHUNPUR_3": "Independent_BISHUNPUR_3", "BTP_BISHUNPUR": "BTP_BISHUNPUR", "BSP_BISHUNPUR": "BSP_BISHUNPUR", "BRJNJGGWP_BISHUNPUR": "BRJNJGGWP_BISHUNPUR", "Independent_BISHUNPUR_4": "Independent_BISHUNPUR_4", "JD_U_BISHUNPUR": "JD_U_BISHUNPUR", "JAC_BISHUNPUR": "JAC_BISHUNPUR", "INC_SIMDEGA": "INC_SIMDEGA", "BJP_SIMDEGA": "BJP_SIMDEGA", "JKP_SIMDEGA": "JKP_SIMDEGA", "NOTA_SIMDEGA": "NOTA_SIMDEGA", "RTSGP_SIMDEGA": "RTSGP_SIMDEGA", "JVM_SIMDEGA": "JVM_SIMDEGA", "Independent_SIMDEGA_1": "Independent_SIMDEGA_1", "JD_U_SIMDEGA": "JD_U_SIMDEGA", "Independent_SIMDEGA_2": "Independent_SIMDEGA_2", "AAAP_SIMDEGA": "AAAP_SIMDEGA", "BRJNJGGWP_SIMDEGA": "BRJNJGGWP_SIMDEGA", "GGP_SIMDEGA": "GGP_SIMDEGA", "INC_KOLEBIRA": "INC_KOLEBIRA", "BJP_KOLEBIRA": "BJP_KOLEBIRA", "JKP_KOLEBIRA": "JKP_KOLEBIRA", "RTSGP_KOLEBIRA": "RTSGP_KOLEBIRA", "NOTA_KOLEBIRA": "NOTA_KOLEBIRA", "BSP_KOLEBIRA": "BSP_KOLEBIRA", "Independent_KOLEBIRA_1": "Independent_KOLEBIRA_1", "Independent_KOLEBIRA_2": "Independent_KOLEBIRA_2", "JVM_KOLEBIRA": "JVM_KOLEBIRA", "Independent_KOLEBIRA_3": "Independent_KOLEBIRA_3", "INC_LOHARDAGA": "INC_LOHARDAGA", "BJP_LOHARDAGA": "BJP_LOHARDAGA", "AJSUP_LOHARDAGA": "AJSUP_LOHARDAGA", "BTP_LOHARDAGA": "BTP_LOHARDAGA", "NOTA_LOHARDAGA": "NOTA_LOHARDAGA", "JVM_LOHARDAGA": "JVM_LOHARDAGA", "JD_U_LOHARDAGA": "JD_U_LOHARDAGA", "Independent_LOHARDAGA_1": "Independent_LOHARDAGA_1", "BSP_LOHARDAGA": "BSP_LOHARDAGA", "Independent_LOHARDAGA_2": "Independent_LOHARDAGA_2", "Independent_LOHARDAGA_3": "Independent_LOHARDAGA_3", "Independent_LOHARDAGA_4": "Independent_LOHARDAGA_4", "INC_MANIKA": "INC_MANIKA", "BJP_MANIKA": "BJP_MANIKA", "NOTA_MANIKA": "NOTA_MANIKA", "SP_MANIKA": "SP_MANIKA", "BSP_MANIKA": "BSP_MANIKA", "Independent_MANIKA_1": "Independent_MANIKA_1", "CPI_ML_L_MANIKA": "CPI_ML_L_MANIKA", "JVM_MANIKA": "JVM_MANIKA", "JD_U_MANIKA": "JD_U_MANIKA", "PPID_MANIKA": "PPID_MANIKA", "BRJNJGGWP_MANIKA": "BRJNJGGWP_MANIKA", "JMM_LATEHAR": "JMM_LATEHAR", "BJP_LATEHAR": "BJP_LATEHAR", "Independent_LATEHAR_1": "Independent_LATEHAR_1", "JVM_LATEHAR": "JVM_LATEHAR", "NOTA_LATEHAR": "NOTA_LATEHAR", "Independent_LATEHAR_2": "Independent_LATEHAR_2", "BSP_LATEHAR": "BSP_LATEHAR", "Independent_LATEHAR_3": "Independent_LATEHAR_3", "Independent_LATEHAR_4": "Independent_LATEHAR_4", "HAMS_LATEHAR": "HAMS_LATEHAR", "Independent_LATEHAR_5": "Independent_LATEHAR_5", "JD_U_LATEHAR": "JD_U_LATEHAR", "BJP_PANKI": "BJP_PANKI", "INC_PANKI": "INC_PANKI", "Independent_PANKI_1": "Independent_PANKI_1", "Independent_PANKI_2": "Independent_PANKI_2", "Independent_PANKI_3": "Independent_PANKI_3", "CPI_PANKI": "CPI_PANKI", "BSP_PANKI": "BSP_PANKI", "NOTA_PANKI": "NOTA_PANKI", "Independent_PANKI_4": "Independent_PANKI_4", "JVM_PANKI": "JVM_PANKI", "AITC_PANKI": "AITC_PANKI", "JD_U_PANKI": "JD_U_PANKI", "RTMP_PANKI": "RTMP_PANKI", "BLSP_PANKI": "BLSP_PANKI", "LJP_PANKI": "LJP_PANKI", "DD_PANKI": "DD_PANKI", "BJP_DALTONGANJ": "BJP_DALTONGANJ", "INC_DALTONGANJ": "INC_DALTONGANJ", "JVM_DALTONGANJ": "JVM_DALTONGANJ", "NOTA_DALTONGANJ": "NOTA_DALTONGANJ", "Independent_DALTONGANJ_1": "Independent_DALTONGANJ_1", "Independent_DALTONGANJ_2": "Independent_DALTONGANJ_2", "BSP_DALTONGANJ": "BSP_DALTONGANJ", "NCP_DALTONGANJ": "NCP_DALTONGANJ", "Independent_DALTONGANJ_3": "Independent_DALTONGANJ_3", "Independent_DALTONGANJ_4": "Independent_DALTONGANJ_4", "Independent_DALTONGANJ_5": "Independent_DALTONGANJ_5", "RJBP_DALTONGANJ": "RJBP_DALTONGANJ", "BMUP_DALTONGANJ": "BMUP_DALTONGANJ", "Independent_DALTONGANJ_6": "Independent_DALTONGANJ_6", "SHS_DALTONGANJ": "SHS_DALTONGANJ", "SP_DALTONGANJ": "SP_DALTONGANJ", "BJP_BISHRAMPUR": "BJP_BISHRAMPUR", "BSP_BISHRAMPUR": "BSP_BISHRAMPUR", "Independent_BISHRAMPUR_1": "Independent_BISHRAMPUR_1", "INC_BISHRAMPUR": "INC_BISHRAMPUR", "JVM_BISHRAMPUR": "JVM_BISHRAMPUR", "AIMIM_BISHRAMPUR": "AIMIM_BISHRAMPUR", "JD_U_BISHRAMPUR": "JD_U_BISHRAMPUR", "Independent_BISHRAMPUR_2": "Independent_BISHRAMPUR_2", "CPIM_BISHRAMPUR": "CPIM_BISHRAMPUR", "Independent_BISHRAMPUR_3": "Independent_BISHRAMPUR_3", "BMUP_BISHRAMPUR": "BMUP_BISHRAMPUR", "NOTA_BISHRAMPUR": "NOTA_BISHRAMPUR", "AAAP_BISHRAMPUR": "AAAP_BISHRAMPUR", "NYP_BISHRAMPUR": "NYP_BISHRAMPUR", "Independent_BISHRAMPUR_4": "Independent_BISHRAMPUR_4", "Independent_BISHRAMPUR_5": "Independent_BISHRAMPUR_5", "SP_BISHRAMPUR": "SP_BISHRAMPUR", "Independent_BISHRAMPUR_6": "Independent_BISHRAMPUR_6", "PPID_BISHRAMPUR": "PPID_BISHRAMPUR", "Independent_BISHRAMPUR_7": "Independent_BISHRAMPUR_7", "BJP_CHATTARPUR": "BJP_CHATTARPUR", "RJD_CHATTARPUR": "RJD_CHATTARPUR", "AJSUP_CHATTARPUR": "AJSUP_CHATTARPUR", "JVM_CHATTARPUR": "JVM_CHATTARPUR", "JD_U_CHATTARPUR": "JD_U_CHATTARPUR", "BSP_CHATTARPUR": "BSP_CHATTARPUR", "LJP_CHATTARPUR": "LJP_CHATTARPUR", "NOTA_CHATTARPUR": "NOTA_CHATTARPUR", "CPI_CHATTARPUR": "CPI_CHATTARPUR", "SP_CHATTARPUR": "SP_CHATTARPUR", "JSVP_CHATTARPUR": "JSVP_CHATTARPUR", "JPJD_CHATTARPUR": "JPJD_CHATTARPUR", "PPID_CHATTARPUR": "PPID_CHATTARPUR", "NCP_HUSSAINABAD": "NCP_HUSSAINABAD", "RJD_HUSSAINABAD": "RJD_HUSSAINABAD", "BSP_HUSSAINABAD": "BSP_HUSSAINABAD", "Independent_HUSSAINABAD_1": "Independent_HUSSAINABAD_1", "AJSUP_HUSSAINABAD": "AJSUP_HUSSAINABAD", "Independent_HUSSAINABAD_2": "Independent_HUSSAINABAD_2", "Independent_HUSSAINABAD_3": "Independent_HUSSAINABAD_3", "JPJD_HUSSAINABAD": "JPJD_HUSSAINABAD", "SBSP_HUSSAINABAD": "SBSP_HUSSAINABAD", "Independent_HUSSAINABAD_4": "Independent_HUSSAINABAD_4", "JVM_HUSSAINABAD": "JVM_HUSSAINABAD", "JD_U_HUSSAINABAD": "JD_U_HUSSAINABAD", "NOTA_HUSSAINABAD": "NOTA_HUSSAINABAD", "Independent_HUSSAINABAD_5": "Independent_HUSSAINABAD_5", "APoI_HUSSAINABAD": "APoI_HUSSAINABAD", "LJP_HUSSAINABAD": "LJP_HUSSAINABAD", "AAAP_HUSSAINABAD": "AAAP_HUSSAINABAD", "Independent_HUSSAINABAD_6": "Independent_HUSSAINABAD_6", "Independent_HUSSAINABAD_7": "Independent_HUSSAINABAD_7", "BaSaPa_HUSSAINABAD": "BaSaPa_HUSSAINABAD", "JMM_GARHWA": "JMM_GARHWA", "BJP_GARHWA": "BJP_GARHWA", "BSP_GARHWA": "BSP_GARHWA", "AITC_GARHWA": "AITC_GARHWA", "AIMIM_GARHWA": "AIMIM_GARHWA", "JVM_GARHWA": "JVM_GARHWA", "Independent_GARHWA_1": "Independent_GARHWA_1", "Independent_GARHWA_2": "Independent_GARHWA_2", "Independent_GARHWA_3": "Independent_GARHWA_3", "Independent_GARHWA_4": "Independent_GARHWA_4", "Independent_GARHWA_5": "Independent_GARHWA_5", "RJBP_GARHWA": "RJBP_GARHWA", "NOTA_GARHWA": "NOTA_GARHWA", "Independent_GARHWA_6": "Independent_GARHWA_6", "JD_U_GARHWA": "JD_U_GARHWA", "SHS_GARHWA": "SHS_GARHWA", "PPID_GARHWA": "PPID_GARHWA", "BJP_BHAWANATHPUR": "BJP_BHAWANATHPUR", "BSP_BHAWANATHPUR": "BSP_BHAWANATHPUR", "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_1": "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_1", "INC_BHAWANATHPUR": "INC_BHAWANATHPUR", "JVM_BHAWANATHPUR": "JVM_BHAWANATHPUR", "LJP_BHAWANATHPUR": "LJP_BHAWANATHPUR", "CPI_BHAWANATHPUR": "CPI_BHAWANATHPUR", "AITC_BHAWANATHPUR": "AITC_BHAWANATHPUR", "JD_U_BHAWANATHPUR": "JD_U_BHAWANATHPUR", "NOTA_BHAWANATHPUR": "NOTA_BHAWANATHPUR", "SUCI_C_BHAWANATHPUR": "SUCI_C_BHAWANATHPUR", "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_2": "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_2", "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_3": "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_3", "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_4": "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_4", "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_5": "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_5", "JP_BHAWANATHPUR": "JP_BHAWANATHPUR", "CPI_ML_L_BHAWANATHPUR": "CPI_ML_L_BHAWANATHPUR", "SP_BHAWANATHPUR": "SP_BHAWANATHPUR", "VPI_BHAWANATHPUR": "VPI_BHAWANATHPUR", "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_6": "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_6", "AAAP_BHAWANATHPUR": "AAAP_BHAWANATHPUR", "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_7": "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_7", "CPIM_BHAWANATHPUR": "CPIM_BHAWANATHPUR", "JRJP_BHAWANATHPUR": "JRJP_BHAWANATHPUR", "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_8": "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_8", "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_9": "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_9", "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_10": "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_10", "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_11": "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_11", "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_12": "Independent_BHAWANATHPUR_12"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 81, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 81, "cast_gt_registered": 81}, "n_stations_flagged": 81, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:39:02.658444", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.43, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.324, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.656, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.664, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.43, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.43, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.324, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.324, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.563, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.527, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 81}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "77b965f0d98c4621a5d8f4a5d20d0acd", "name": "India 2020 local (overnight india-delhi-2020-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2020, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Delhi/Delhi_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AAAP": "AAAP", "BJP": "BJP", "INC": "INC", "LTSP": "LTSP", "BSP": "BSP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "SHtP": "SHtP", "AAPP": "AAPP", "PPID": "PPID", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "RAJSPty": "RAJSPty", "BSNP": "BSNP", "JD_U": "JD_U", "SHS": "SHS", "RJD": "RJD", "UKKD": "UKKD", "RLD": "RLD", "SUCI": "SUCI", "SatBP": "SatBP", "BhaRP": "BhaRP", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "RPPRINAT": "RPPRINAT", "HND": "HND", "JANADIP": "JANADIP", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "AASPS": "AASPS", "RAM": "RAM", "RSPS": "RSPS", "RJSPS": "RJSPS", "CPI": "CPI", "TPSTP": "TPSTP", "AKBHJSP": "AKBHJSP", "bjdi": "bjdi", "RVNP": "RVNP", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "Independent_5_2": "Independent_5_2", "Independent_5_3": "Independent_5_3", "Independent_5_4": "Independent_5_4", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "Independent_6_2": "Independent_6_2", "BSKRP": "BSKRP", "Independent_6_3": "Independent_6_3", "RaNP": "RaNP", "ASSP": "ASSP", "BPC": "BPC", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "Independent_9_2": "Independent_9_2", "Independent_9_3": "Independent_9_3", "Independent_9_4": "Independent_9_4", "LJP": "LJP", "svjn": "svjn", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "SWAP": "SWAP", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "DJP": "DJP", "VSP": "VSP", "SWARAJ": "SWARAJ", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "BHUDRP": "BHUDRP", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "Independent_14_3": "Independent_14_3", "Independent_14_4": "Independent_14_4", "Independent_14_5": "Independent_14_5", "BLokSP": "BLokSP", "Independent_14_6": "Independent_14_6", "JKiP": "JKiP", "PMPT": "PMPT", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "VPI": "VPI", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "CPIM": "CPIM", "Independent_17_3": "Independent_17_3", "Independent_17_4": "Independent_17_4", "ABHM": "ABHM", "AIFB": "AIFB", "PHRC": "PHRC", "BSKP": "BSKP", "RRP": "RRP", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "Independent_19_3": "Independent_19_3", "Independent_19_4": "Independent_19_4", "Independent_19_5": "Independent_19_5", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_20_2": "Independent_20_2", "Independent_20_3": "Independent_20_3", "Independent_20_4": "Independent_20_4", "RTPP": "RTPP", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_21_2": "Independent_21_2", "BRRTD": "BRRTD", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_23_2": "Independent_23_2", "Independent_23_3": "Independent_23_3", "Independent_23_4": "Independent_23_4", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "Independent_25_4": "Independent_25_4", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "APoI": "APoI", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "Independent_27_3": "Independent_27_3", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "NYP": "NYP", "Independent_28_4": "Independent_28_4", "Independent_28_5": "Independent_28_5", "Independent_28_6": "Independent_28_6", "Independent_28_7": "Independent_28_7", "Independent_28_8": "Independent_28_8", "Independent_28_9": "Independent_28_9", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "AJPI": "AJPI", "AJPSH": "AJPSH", "PBI": "PBI", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "RJAP": "RJAP", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "JDNTP": "JDNTP", "MZEKP": "MZEKP", "RMEP": "RMEP", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "Independent_35_2": "Independent_35_2", "Independent_35_3": "Independent_35_3", "Independent_35_4": "Independent_35_4", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "ANC": "ANC", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "Independent_37_3": "Independent_37_3", "Independent_37_4": "Independent_37_4", "RPI_A": "RPI_A", "NCP": "NCP", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_38_3": "Independent_38_3", "Independent_38_4": "Independent_38_4", "Independent_38_5": "Independent_38_5", "PUJP": "PUJP", "JAVP": "JAVP", "AnAP": "AnAP", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_40_3": "Independent_40_3", "RTORP": "RTORP", "Independent_40_4": "Independent_40_4", "Independent_40_5": "Independent_40_5", "Independent_40_6": "Independent_40_6", "AHNP": "AHNP", "HAMS": "HAMS", "Independent_40_7": "Independent_40_7", "Independent_40_8": "Independent_40_8", "Independent_40_9": "Independent_40_9", "Independent_40_10": "Independent_40_10", "BLPGL": "BLPGL", "VIJAYBHA": "VIJAYBHA", "Independent_40_11": "Independent_40_11", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "Independent_46_3": "Independent_46_3", "INDPJC": "INDPJC", "SDPI": "SDPI", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "MaNPa": "MaNPa", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "SSBDP": "SSBDP", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "PSJP": "PSJP", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "SJSMP": "SJSMP", "Independent_52_3": "Independent_52_3", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "Independent_53_2": "Independent_53_2", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "JRJP": "JRJP", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_54_3": "Independent_54_3", "Independent_54_4": "Independent_54_4", "LPOI": "LPOI", "AP": "AP", "JSPR": "JSPR", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_56_2": "Independent_56_2", "JmtP": "JmtP", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_57_2": "Independent_57_2", "Independent_57_3": "Independent_57_3", "LKSHPLK": "LKSHPLK", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "JDKRP": "JDKRP", "Independent_59_2": "Independent_59_2", "BALP": "BALP", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "Independent_61_3": "Independent_61_3", "RJBP": "RJBP", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "JaSSP": "JaSSP", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_64_2": "Independent_64_2", "Independent_64_3": "Independent_64_3", "NYAYPR": "NYAYPR", "BAHUMP": "BAHUMP", "MKDVP": "MKDVP", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_67_1": "Independent_67_1", "Independent_67_2": "Independent_67_2", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "RJ": "RJ", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "Independent_70_2": "Independent_70_2", "Independent_70_3": "Independent_70_3", "SP_I": "SP_I", "Independent_70_4": "Independent_70_4", "SPRP": "SPRP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 70, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 70, "registered_not_positive": 70}, "n_stations_flagged": 70, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:38:54.684319", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.39, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.292, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.209, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.304, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.39, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.39, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.292, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.221, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.221, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.753, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.753, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.663, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.663, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.449, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 70}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e1c5e37909f84b9ca4f61e02f9c9d6eb", "name": "India 2024 local (overnight india-arunachal-2024-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Arunachal_Democratic_Party": "Arunachal_Democratic_Party", "Bharatiya_Janata_Party": "Bharatiya_Janata_Party", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "Indian_National_Congress": "Indian_National_Congress", "Lok_Janshakti_Party_Ram_Vilas": "Lok_Janshakti_Party_Ram_Vilas", "National_People_s_Party": "National_People_s_Party", "Nationalist_Congress_Party": "Nationalist_Congress_Party", "People_s_Party_of_Arunachal": "People_s_Party_of_Arunachal", "NOTA": "NOTA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 60, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 60, "cast_gt_registered": 60}, "n_stations_flagged": 60, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:32:32.454842", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.381, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.281, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.281, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 60}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "11d4e9bd5a8242cdac0977359dba269e", "name": "India 2022 local (overnight india_uttar_pradesh_2022_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Uttar_Pradesh/Uttar_Pradesh_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"party_SP": "party_SP", "party_BJP": "party_BJP", "party_BSP": "party_BSP", "party_INC": "party_INC", "party_AAAP": "party_AAAP", "party_NOTA": "party_NOTA", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "Independent_1_3": "Independent_1_3", "party_AIMIM": "party_AIMIM", "party_ASPKR": "party_ASPKR", "party_Inqalab_Vikas_Dal": "party_Inqalab_Vikas_Dal", "party_Jai_Maha_Bharath_Party": "party_Jai_Maha_Bharath_Party", "party_Aamjan_Ekta_Party": "party_Aamjan_Ekta_Party", "party_Lok_Dal": "party_Lok_Dal", "party_Akhand_Bharat_Vikas_Party": "party_Akhand_Bharat_Vikas_Party", "party_Bahujan_Mukti_Party": "party_Bahujan_Mukti_Party", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "party_Sanyukt_Vikas_Party": "party_Sanyukt_Vikas_Party", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "party_Log_Party": "party_Log_Party", "Independent_4_4": "Independent_4_4", "party_Bharatrashtra_Democratic_Party": "party_Bharatrashtra_Democratic_Party", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "party_Jansatta_Party": "party_Jansatta_Party", "party_RLD": "party_RLD", "party_India_Janshakti_Party": "party_India_Janshakti_Party", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "Independent_8_3": "Independent_8_3", "Independent_8_4": "Independent_8_4", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "party_SDPI": "party_SDPI", "Independent_9_2": "Independent_9_2", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "party_Sarvjan_Lok_Shakti_Party": "party_Sarvjan_Lok_Shakti_Party", "Independent_10_3": "Independent_10_3", "Independent_10_4": "Independent_10_4", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "Independent_11_3": "Independent_11_3", "party_Jai_Samta_Party": "party_Jai_Samta_Party", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "party_RSPS": "party_RSPS", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "Independent_12_3": "Independent_12_3", "Independent_12_4": "Independent_12_4", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "Independent_13_3": "Independent_13_3", "party_Majdoor_Kisan_Union_Party": "party_Majdoor_Kisan_Union_Party", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "Independent_14_3": "Independent_14_3", "Independent_14_4": "Independent_14_4", "party_Bharat_Lok_Sewak_Party": "party_Bharat_Lok_Sewak_Party", "Independent_14_5": "Independent_14_5", "Independent_14_6": "Independent_14_6", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "party_Bharatiya_Sarvodaya_Kranti_Party": "party_Bharatiya_Sarvodaya_Kranti_Party", "Independent_15_2": "Independent_15_2", "party_SHS": "party_SHS", "party_Pichhra_Samaj_Party": "party_Pichhra_Samaj_Party", "Independent_15_3": "Independent_15_3", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "party_Rashtra_Nirman_Party": "party_Rashtra_Nirman_Party", "Independent_16_2": "Independent_16_2", "Independent_16_3": "Independent_16_3", "Independent_16_4": "Independent_16_4", "party_Rashtriya_Samaj_Dal_R": "party_Rashtriya_Samaj_Dal_R", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "party_Gareeb_Kranti_Party": "party_Gareeb_Kranti_Party", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "Independent_17_3": "Independent_17_3", "party_Rashtriya_mahan_Gantantra_Party": "party_Rashtriya_mahan_Gantantra_Party", "party_Ambedkar_Samaj_Party": "party_Ambedkar_Samaj_Party", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_18_3": "Independent_18_3", "party_Peoples_Party_of_India_Democratic": "party_Peoples_Party_of_India_Democratic", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "party_Loktanter_Suraksha_Party": "party_Loktanter_Suraksha_Party", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "party_Bhartiya_Jan_Samman_Party": "party_Bhartiya_Jan_Samman_Party", "party_Jan_Adhikar_Party": "party_Jan_Adhikar_Party", "party_Bhartiya_Damitjan_Party": "party_Bhartiya_Damitjan_Party", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "party_Rashtrawadi_Janlok_Party_Satya": "party_Rashtrawadi_Janlok_Party_Satya", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_22_2": "Independent_22_2", "Independent_22_3": "Independent_22_3", "Independent_22_4": "Independent_22_4", "Independent_22_5": "Independent_22_5", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_23_2": "Independent_23_2", "party_Samajwadi_Andolan_Party": "party_Samajwadi_Andolan_Party", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "Independent_24_2": "Independent_24_2", "Independent_24_3": "Independent_24_3", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "Independent_25_4": "Independent_25_4", "Independent_25_5": "Independent_25_5", "party_Peace_Party": "party_Peace_Party", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "party_Rashtriya_Samanta_Dal": "party_Rashtriya_Samanta_Dal", "Independent_26_3": "Independent_26_3", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "party_Nagrik_Ekta_Party": "party_Nagrik_Ekta_Party", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "party_Lok_Janshakti_Party_Ram_Vilas": "party_Lok_Janshakti_Party_Ram_Vilas", "party_SUCI": "party_SUCI", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "Independent_29_4": "Independent_29_4", "party_Rashtriya_Parivartan_Dal": "party_Rashtriya_Parivartan_Dal", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_31_2": "Independent_31_2", "Independent_31_3": "Independent_31_3", "Independent_31_4": "Independent_31_4", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_32_3": "Independent_32_3", "Independent_32_4": "Independent_32_4", "Independent_32_5": "Independent_32_5", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "Independent_33_4": "Independent_33_4", "party_ADS": "party_ADS", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_34_3": "Independent_34_3", "party_Minorities_Democratic_Party": "party_Minorities_Democratic_Party", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "party_Sabka_Dal_United": "party_Sabka_Dal_United", "Independent_35_2": "Independent_35_2", "Independent_35_3": "Independent_35_3", "Independent_35_4": "Independent_35_4", "party_Jagrook_Janta_Party": "party_Jagrook_Janta_Party", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "party_JD_U": "party_JD_U", "party_Bharatiya_Subhash_Sena": "party_Bharatiya_Subhash_Sena", "Independent_36_3": "Independent_36_3", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "party_Lok_Shakti": "party_Lok_Shakti", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_39_2": "Independent_39_2", "Independent_39_3": "Independent_39_3", "Independent_39_4": "Independent_39_4", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_40_3": "Independent_40_3", "Independent_40_4": "Independent_40_4", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "party_Pachchasi_Parivartan_Samaj_Party": "party_Pachchasi_Parivartan_Samaj_Party", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_42_2": "Independent_42_2", "party_Vikas_India_Party": "party_Vikas_India_Party", "party_Naki_Bharatiya_Ekta_Party": "party_Naki_Bharatiya_Ekta_Party", "party_AIFB": "party_AIFB", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_43_2": "Independent_43_2", "party_Bhartiya_Janta_Dal": "party_Bhartiya_Janta_Dal", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "Independent_44_3": "Independent_44_3", "party_Bhartiya_Veer_Dal": "party_Bhartiya_Veer_Dal", "party_Bharatiya_Jan_Jagriti_Party": "party_Bharatiya_Jan_Jagriti_Party", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "party_LJP": "party_LJP", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "party_Apni_Janta_Party": "party_Apni_Janta_Party", "party_Nyay_Party": "party_Nyay_Party", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "party_Samagra_Vikas_Party": "party_Samagra_Vikas_Party", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_48_2": "Independent_48_2", "party_Sabse_Achchhi_Party": "party_Sabse_Achchhi_Party", "party_Mihir_Sena": "party_Mihir_Sena", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "Independent_49_3": "Independent_49_3", "party_VIP": "party_VIP", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "party_Bhartiya_Tarak_Samaj_Party": "party_Bhartiya_Tarak_Samaj_Party", "party_Indian_Nationalist_Alliance_Party_India": "party_Indian_Nationalist_Alliance_Party_India", "party_Akhil_Bhartiya_Lok_Dal": "party_Akhil_Bhartiya_Lok_Dal", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "Independent_52_3": "Independent_52_3", "party_Secular_Inqlab_Party": "party_Secular_Inqlab_Party", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "party_Hindusthan_Nirman_Dal": "party_Hindusthan_Nirman_Dal", "party_Subhashwadi_Bhartiya_Samajwadi_Party_Subhas_Party": "party_Subhashwadi_Bhartiya_Samajwadi_Party_Subhas_Party", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "party_Vijay_Bharat_Party": "party_Vijay_Bharat_Party", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_55_2": "Independent_55_2", "party_Right_to_Recall_Party": "party_Right_to_Recall_Party", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_56_2": "Independent_56_2", "Independent_56_3": "Independent_56_3", "Independent_56_4": "Independent_56_4", "Independent_56_5": "Independent_56_5", "Independent_56_6": "Independent_56_6", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_58_1": "Independent_58_1", "Independent_58_2": "Independent_58_2", "Independent_58_3": "Independent_58_3", "party_Nagrik_Chetna_Party": "party_Nagrik_Chetna_Party", "party_Swatantra_Jantaraj_Party": "party_Swatantra_Jantaraj_Party", "Independent_58_4": "Independent_58_4", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_59_2": "Independent_59_2", "Independent_59_3": "Independent_59_3", "Independent_59_4": "Independent_59_4", "party_All_India_Hindustan_Congress_Party": "party_All_India_Hindustan_Congress_Party", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "party_Liberal_Party_of_India": "party_Liberal_Party_of_India", "party_Loktantrik_Janshakti_Party": "party_Loktantrik_Janshakti_Party", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "Independent_61_3": "Independent_61_3", "party_Rashtriya_Janta_Party": "party_Rashtriya_Janta_Party", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_62_3": "Independent_62_3", "Independent_62_4": "Independent_62_4", "party_Sarv_Samaj_Party": "party_Sarv_Samaj_Party", "party_Bahujan_Andolan_Party": "party_Bahujan_Andolan_Party", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "Independent_63_3": "Independent_63_3", "Independent_63_4": "Independent_63_4", "Independent_63_5": "Independent_63_5", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_65_2": "Independent_65_2", "party_All_India_Minorities_Front": "party_All_India_Minorities_Front", "Independent_65_3": "Independent_65_3", "Independent_65_4": "Independent_65_4", "party_Hindustan_Utthan_Party": "party_Hindustan_Utthan_Party", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_66_2": "Independent_66_2", "party_NCP": "party_NCP", "Independent_67_1": "Independent_67_1", "Independent_67_2": "Independent_67_2", "Independent_67_3": "Independent_67_3", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "Independent_70_2": "Independent_70_2", "Independent_70_3": "Independent_70_3", "Independent_71_1": "Independent_71_1", "Independent_71_2": "Independent_71_2", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "Independent_73_3": "Independent_73_3", "Independent_73_4": "Independent_73_4", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_74_2": "Independent_74_2", "Independent_74_3": "Independent_74_3", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_75_2": "Independent_75_2", "Independent_75_3": "Independent_75_3", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_76_3": "Independent_76_3", "Independent_76_4": "Independent_76_4", "Independent_76_5": "Independent_76_5", "Independent_76_6": "Independent_76_6", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_78_2": "Independent_78_2", "Independent_78_3": "Independent_78_3", "Independent_78_4": "Independent_78_4", "Independent_78_5": "Independent_78_5", "Independent_79_1": "Independent_79_1", "Independent_79_2": "Independent_79_2", "Independent_79_3": "Independent_79_3", "Independent_79_4": "Independent_79_4", "party_Rashtriya_Shoshit_Samaj_Party": "party_Rashtriya_Shoshit_Samaj_Party", "Independent_79_5": "Independent_79_5", "party_Swadeshi_Hind_Party": "party_Swadeshi_Hind_Party", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_80_2": "Independent_80_2", "Independent_80_3": "Independent_80_3", "Independent_80_4": "Independent_80_4", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "party_CPI": "party_CPI", "Independent_81_2": "Independent_81_2", "Independent_81_3": "Independent_81_3", "Independent_81_4": "Independent_81_4", "Independent_81_5": "Independent_81_5", "Independent_82_1": "Independent_82_1", "Independent_82_2": "Independent_82_2", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_83_2": "Independent_83_2", "Independent_83_3": "Independent_83_3", "Independent_83_4": "Independent_83_4", "Independent_83_5": "Independent_83_5", "party_Rashtriya_Samta_Vikas_Party": "party_Rashtriya_Samta_Vikas_Party", "Independent_84_1": "Independent_84_1", "Independent_84_2": "Independent_84_2", "Independent_84_3": "Independent_84_3", "party_Anarakshit_Samaj_Party": "party_Anarakshit_Samaj_Party", "Independent_84_4": "Independent_84_4", "Independent_86_1": "Independent_86_1", "Independent_86_2": "Independent_86_2", "Independent_86_3": "Independent_86_3", "party_Rashtriya_Vyapari_Party": "party_Rashtriya_Vyapari_Party", "Independent_86_4": "Independent_86_4", "Independent_86_5": "Independent_86_5", "Independent_87_1": "Independent_87_1", "Independent_87_2": "Independent_87_2", "party_Bharatiya_Majdoor_Janta_Party": "party_Bharatiya_Majdoor_Janta_Party", "Independent_87_3": "Independent_87_3", "party_Lokpriya_Rashtrawadi_Party": "party_Lokpriya_Rashtrawadi_Party", "party_IUML": "party_IUML", "party_Adarsh_Samaj_Party": "party_Adarsh_Samaj_Party", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_89_2": "Independent_89_2", "Independent_89_3": "Independent_89_3", "party_Jan_Abhiyan_Party": "party_Jan_Abhiyan_Party", "Independent_89_4": "Independent_89_4", "party_Saman_Adhikar_Party": "party_Saman_Adhikar_Party", "Independent_90_1": "Independent_90_1", "Independent_90_2": "Independent_90_2", "Independent_90_3": "Independent_90_3", "Independent_91_1": "Independent_91_1", "Independent_91_2": "Independent_91_2", "party_VANCHITSAMAJ_INSAAF_PARTY": "party_VANCHITSAMAJ_INSAAF_PARTY", "Independent_91_3": "Independent_91_3", "Independent_91_4": "Independent_91_4", "Independent_92_1": "Independent_92_1", "Independent_92_2": "Independent_92_2", "Independent_92_3": "Independent_92_3", "Independent_92_4": "Independent_92_4", "Independent_92_5": "Independent_92_5", "Independent_92_6": "Independent_92_6", "Independent_93_1": "Independent_93_1", "Independent_93_2": "Independent_93_2", "Independent_93_3": "Independent_93_3", "Independent_94_1": "Independent_94_1", "Independent_94_2": "Independent_94_2", "Independent_94_3": "Independent_94_3", "Independent_94_4": "Independent_94_4", "Independent_94_5": "Independent_94_5", "Independent_94_6": "Independent_94_6", "Independent_94_7": "Independent_94_7", "Independent_95_1": "Independent_95_1", "party_Bharatiya_Kisan_Parivartan_Party": "party_Bharatiya_Kisan_Parivartan_Party", "Independent_95_2": "Independent_95_2", "Independent_96_1": "Independent_96_1", "Independent_96_2": "Independent_96_2", "Independent_96_3": "Independent_96_3", "Independent_96_4": "Independent_96_4", "Independent_97_1": "Independent_97_1", "Independent_97_2": "Independent_97_2", "party_Moulik_Adhikar_Party": "party_Moulik_Adhikar_Party", "party_Bhartiya_Shakti_Chetna_Party": "party_Bhartiya_Shakti_Chetna_Party", "Independent_99_1": "Independent_99_1", "Independent_99_2": "Independent_99_2", "Independent_99_3": "Independent_99_3", "party_Adarsh_Janta_Party": "party_Adarsh_Janta_Party", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_100_2": "Independent_100_2", "party_Rashtriya_Surya_Prakash_Party": "party_Rashtriya_Surya_Prakash_Party", "Independent_101_1": "Independent_101_1", "Independent_101_2": "Independent_101_2", "Independent_101_3": "Independent_101_3", "Independent_101_4": "Independent_101_4", "Independent_101_5": "Independent_101_5", "Independent_102_1": "Independent_102_1", "Independent_102_2": "Independent_102_2", "Independent_102_3": "Independent_102_3", "Independent_102_4": "Independent_102_4", "party_Rashtriya_Backward_Party": "party_Rashtriya_Backward_Party", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_103_2": "Independent_103_2", "Independent_103_3": "Independent_103_3", "Independent_103_4": "Independent_103_4", "Independent_103_5": "Independent_103_5", "Independent_103_6": "Independent_103_6", "Independent_104_1": "Independent_104_1", "Independent_104_2": "Independent_104_2", "Independent_104_3": "Independent_104_3", "Independent_104_4": "Independent_104_4", "Independent_104_5": "Independent_104_5", "party_Voters_Party_International": "party_Voters_Party_International", "Independent_104_6": "Independent_104_6", "Independent_104_7": "Independent_104_7", "Independent_104_8": "Independent_104_8", "Independent_105_1": "Independent_105_1", "Independent_105_2": "Independent_105_2", "Independent_105_3": "Independent_105_3", "Independent_106_1": "Independent_106_1", "Independent_106_2": "Independent_106_2", "Independent_106_3": "Independent_106_3", "party_JDL": "party_JDL", "party_Bhartiya_Jan_Nayak_Party": "party_Bhartiya_Jan_Nayak_Party", "Independent_108_1": "Independent_108_1", "Independent_108_2": "Independent_108_2", "Independent_109_1": "Independent_109_1", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "Independent_111_2": "Independent_111_2", "Independent_111_3": "Independent_111_3", "Independent_112_1": "Independent_112_1", "party_Sanyukt_Samajwadi_Dal": "party_Sanyukt_Samajwadi_Dal", "Independent_112_2": "Independent_112_2", "Independent_113_1": "Independent_113_1", "Independent_113_2": "Independent_113_2", "Independent_113_3": "Independent_113_3", "party_Jan_Seva_Sahayak_Party": "party_Jan_Seva_Sahayak_Party", "Independent_114_1": "Independent_114_1", "Independent_114_2": "Independent_114_2", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "party_Garib_Berozgar_Vikas_Party": "party_Garib_Berozgar_Vikas_Party", "party_Rashtra_Uday_Party": "party_Rashtra_Uday_Party", "Independent_118_1": "Independent_118_1", "Independent_118_2": "Independent_118_2", "Independent_118_3": "Independent_118_3", "Independent_118_4": "Independent_118_4", "Independent_119_1": "Independent_119_1", "Independent_121_1": "Independent_121_1", "Independent_121_2": "Independent_121_2", "Independent_121_3": "Independent_121_3", "Independent_121_4": "Independent_121_4", "Independent_122_1": "Independent_122_1", "Independent_122_2": "Independent_122_2", "Independent_122_3": "Independent_122_3", "Independent_123_1": "Independent_123_1", "Independent_123_2": "Independent_123_2", "party_Rashtriya_Mazdoor_Ekta_Party": "party_Rashtriya_Mazdoor_Ekta_Party", "Independent_123_3": "Independent_123_3", "Independent_123_4": "Independent_123_4", "Independent_123_5": "Independent_123_5", "party_Jan_Shakti_Ekta_Party": "party_Jan_Shakti_Ekta_Party", "Independent_124_1": "Independent_124_1", "party_Mera_Adhikaar_Rashtriya_Dal": "party_Mera_Adhikaar_Rashtriya_Dal", "Independent_125_1": "Independent_125_1", "Independent_125_2": "Independent_125_2", "Independent_125_3": "Independent_125_3", "Independent_125_4": "Independent_125_4", "Independent_125_5": "Independent_125_5", "Independent_126_1": "Independent_126_1", "Independent_126_2": "Independent_126_2", "Independent_127_1": "Independent_127_1", "Independent_127_2": "Independent_127_2", "Independent_129_1": "Independent_129_1", "Independent_129_2": "Independent_129_2", "Independent_129_3": "Independent_129_3", "Independent_129_4": "Independent_129_4", "party_Rashtriya_Teesara_Vikalp_Party": "party_Rashtriya_Teesara_Vikalp_Party", "Independent_130_1": "Independent_130_1", "Independent_130_2": "Independent_130_2", "Independent_130_3": "Independent_130_3", "Independent_130_4": "Independent_130_4", "party_Naitik_Party": "party_Naitik_Party", "Independent_131_1": "Independent_131_1", "Independent_131_2": "Independent_131_2", "Independent_131_3": "Independent_131_3", "Independent_131_4": "Independent_131_4", "Independent_132_1": "Independent_132_1", "Independent_132_2": "Independent_132_2", "Independent_132_3": "Independent_132_3", "party_Bhartiya_Krishak_Dal": "party_Bhartiya_Krishak_Dal", "Independent_133_1": "Independent_133_1", "Independent_133_2": "Independent_133_2", "Independent_133_3": "Independent_133_3", "Independent_133_4": "Independent_133_4", "Independent_134_1": "Independent_134_1", "Independent_134_2": "Independent_134_2", "Independent_134_3": "Independent_134_3", "Independent_134_4": "Independent_134_4", "Independent_135_1": "Independent_135_1", "Independent_135_2": "Independent_135_2", "Independent_135_3": "Independent_135_3", "Independent_135_4": "Independent_135_4", "Independent_135_5": "Independent_135_5", "Independent_136_1": "Independent_136_1", "Independent_136_2": "Independent_136_2", "Independent_136_3": "Independent_136_3", "party_CPI_ML_L": "party_CPI_ML_L", "Independent_138_1": "Independent_138_1", "party_Nai_Kranti_Party": "party_Nai_Kranti_Party", "Independent_139_1": "Independent_139_1", "Independent_140_1": "Independent_140_1", "Independent_140_2": "Independent_140_2", "party_Asankhya_Samaj_Party": "party_Asankhya_Samaj_Party", "Independent_141_1": "Independent_141_1", "Independent_141_2": "Independent_141_2", "Independent_141_3": "Independent_141_3", "party_Rashtriya_Lokshakti_Party": "party_Rashtriya_Lokshakti_Party", "party_Aam_Aadmi_Parivartan_Party": "party_Aam_Aadmi_Parivartan_Party", "Independent_142_1": "Independent_142_1", "party_Loktantrik_Janwadi_Party": "party_Loktantrik_Janwadi_Party", "party_Bharat_Swabhiman_Party": "party_Bharat_Swabhiman_Party", "Independent_143_1": "Independent_143_1", "party_Uttar_Pradesh_Republican_Party": "party_Uttar_Pradesh_Republican_Party", "Independent_143_2": "Independent_143_2", "party_Janta_Rakshak_Party": "party_Janta_Rakshak_Party", "party_Action_Party": "party_Action_Party", "Independent_144_1": "Independent_144_1", "party_Bharatiya_Jan_Kranti_Dal_Democratic": "party_Bharatiya_Jan_Kranti_Dal_Democratic", "Independent_145_1": "Independent_145_1", "party_Prajashakti_Party_Samdarshi": "party_Prajashakti_Party_Samdarshi", "Independent_145_2": "Independent_145_2", "Independent_145_3": "Independent_145_3", "Independent_145_4": "Independent_145_4", "Independent_146_1": "Independent_146_1", "Independent_146_2": "Independent_146_2", "Independent_146_3": "Independent_146_3", "Independent_146_4": "Independent_146_4", "Independent_146_5": "Independent_146_5", "party_All_India_Peoples_Front_Radical": "party_All_India_Peoples_Front_Radical", "Independent_146_6": "Independent_146_6", "Independent_147_1": "Independent_147_1", "party_Lok_Bandhu_Party": "party_Lok_Bandhu_Party", "Independent_148_1": "Independent_148_1", "Independent_148_2": "Independent_148_2", "Independent_148_3": "Independent_148_3", "Independent_149_1": "Independent_149_1", "Independent_149_2": "Independent_149_2", "Independent_149_3": "Independent_149_3", "Independent_149_4": "Independent_149_4", "Independent_149_5": "Independent_149_5", "Independent_150_1": "Independent_150_1", "Independent_151_1": "Independent_151_1", "party_Bhartiya_Rashtrawadi_Party": "party_Bhartiya_Rashtrawadi_Party", "Independent_151_2": "Independent_151_2", "Independent_151_3": "Independent_151_3", "Independent_152_1": "Independent_152_1", "Independent_152_2": "Independent_152_2", "Independent_152_3": "Independent_152_3", "Independent_152_4": "Independent_152_4", "party_Awami_Samta_Party": "party_Awami_Samta_Party", "party_Sarv_Rajya_Party": "party_Sarv_Rajya_Party", "party_SBSP": "party_SBSP", "Independent_153_1": "Independent_153_1", "Independent_153_2": "Independent_153_2", "Independent_153_3": "Independent_153_3", "Independent_154_1": "Independent_154_1", "Independent_154_2": "Independent_154_2", "Independent_154_3": "Independent_154_3", "Independent_154_4": "Independent_154_4", "Independent_154_5": "Independent_154_5", "Independent_154_6": "Independent_154_6", "Independent_154_7": "Independent_154_7", "Independent_155_1": "Independent_155_1", "Independent_155_2": "Independent_155_2", "Independent_155_3": "Independent_155_3", "Independent_155_4": "Independent_155_4", "party_Manuvadi_Party": "party_Manuvadi_Party", "party_Akhil_Bhartiya_Naitik_Party": "party_Akhil_Bhartiya_Naitik_Party", "Independent_157_1": "Independent_157_1", "Independent_157_2": "Independent_157_2", "Independent_158_1": "Independent_158_1", "Independent_158_2": "Independent_158_2", "Independent_158_3": "Independent_158_3", "Independent_158_4": "Independent_158_4", "party_Bahujan_Party": "party_Bahujan_Party", "Independent_158_5": "Independent_158_5", "Independent_159_1": "Independent_159_1", "Independent_159_2": "Independent_159_2", "Independent_159_3": "Independent_159_3", "Independent_159_4": "Independent_159_4", "party_Satya_Bahumat_Party": "party_Satya_Bahumat_Party", "Independent_159_5": "Independent_159_5", "Independent_159_6": "Independent_159_6", "Independent_160_1": "Independent_160_1", "Independent_160_2": "Independent_160_2", "Independent_160_3": "Independent_160_3", "Independent_161_1": "Independent_161_1", "Independent_161_2": "Independent_161_2", "party_Socialist_Party_India": "party_Socialist_Party_India", "Independent_162_1": "Independent_162_1", "Independent_162_2": "Independent_162_2", "Independent_163_1": "Independent_163_1", "Independent_164_1": "Independent_164_1", "party_Al_Hind_Party": "party_Al_Hind_Party", "party_RASHTRIYA_VIKLANG_PARTY": "party_RASHTRIYA_VIKLANG_PARTY", "Independent_165_1": "Independent_165_1", "Independent_165_2": "Independent_165_2", "Independent_166_1": "Independent_166_1", "Independent_167_1": "Independent_167_1", "Independent_167_2": "Independent_167_2", "Independent_167_3": "Independent_167_3", "Independent_167_4": "Independent_167_4", "party_Bhartiya_Samta_Party": "party_Bhartiya_Samta_Party", "party_Manviya_Bharat_Party": "party_Manviya_Bharat_Party", "Independent_168_1": "Independent_168_1", "Independent_168_2": "Independent_168_2", "party_Bahujan_Awam_Party": "party_Bahujan_Awam_Party", "party_Gandhiyan_Peoples_Party": "party_Gandhiyan_Peoples_Party", "party_Samdarshi_Samaj_Party": "party_Samdarshi_Samaj_Party", "party_Rashtriya_Rashtrawadi_Party": "party_Rashtriya_Rashtrawadi_Party", "party_Kishore_Raj_Party": "party_Kishore_Raj_Party", "Independent_170_1": "Independent_170_1", "party_Rashtriya_Jatigat_Aarakshan_Virodhi_Party": "party_Rashtriya_Jatigat_Aarakshan_Virodhi_Party", "party_Apna_Bharatiya_Sanatan_Party": "party_Apna_Bharatiya_Sanatan_Party", "party_Manavtawadi_Kranti_Dal": "party_Manavtawadi_Kranti_Dal", "Independent_171_1": "Independent_171_1", "Independent_171_2": "Independent_171_2", "Independent_171_3": "Independent_171_3", "Independent_172_1": "Independent_172_1", "Independent_172_2": "Independent_172_2", "party_Bhartiya_Sarvdharm_Party": "party_Bhartiya_Sarvdharm_Party", "Independent_172_3": "Independent_172_3", "Independent_173_1": "Independent_173_1", "party_Samaj_Sevak_Party": "party_Samaj_Sevak_Party", "Independent_173_2": "Independent_173_2", "Independent_174_1": "Independent_174_1", "Independent_174_2": "Independent_174_2", "party_Bharatiya_Jan_Morcha_Party": "party_Bharatiya_Jan_Morcha_Party", "party_Janta_Brigade_Party": "party_Janta_Brigade_Party", "Independent_175_1": "Independent_175_1", "party_Suraksha_Samaj_Party": "party_Suraksha_Samaj_Party", "Independent_176_1": "Independent_176_1", "party_Bhartiya_Dharmanirpeksha_Party": "party_Bhartiya_Dharmanirpeksha_Party", "party_Aam_Janta_Party_India": "party_Aam_Janta_Party_India", "Independent_177_1": "Independent_177_1", "Independent_177_2": "Independent_177_2", "Independent_178_1": "Independent_178_1", "Independent_178_2": "Independent_178_2", "Independent_178_3": "Independent_178_3", "Independent_178_4": "Independent_178_4", "Independent_178_5": "Independent_178_5", "party_Akhil_Bhartiya_Jansatta_Party": "party_Akhil_Bhartiya_Jansatta_Party", "Independent_178_6": "Independent_178_6", "Independent_179_1": "Independent_179_1", "Independent_179_2": "Independent_179_2", "Independent_179_3": "Independent_179_3", "party_Parivartan_Samaj_Party": "party_Parivartan_Samaj_Party", "Independent_179_4": "Independent_179_4", "Independent_179_5": "Independent_179_5", "Independent_180_1": "Independent_180_1", "Independent_180_2": "Independent_180_2", "Independent_180_3": "Independent_180_3", "party_Akhil_Bhartiya_Apna_Dal": "party_Akhil_Bhartiya_Apna_Dal", "Independent_180_4": "Independent_180_4", "party_Hindustan_Samaj_Party": "party_Hindustan_Samaj_Party", "Independent_181_1": "Independent_181_1", "Independent_181_2": "Independent_181_2", "party_Bhartiya_Panchsheel_Party": "party_Bhartiya_Panchsheel_Party", "party_Pragatisheel_Samaj_Party": "party_Pragatisheel_Samaj_Party", "Independent_182_1": "Independent_182_1", "Independent_182_2": "Independent_182_2", "Independent_182_3": "Independent_182_3", "party_Vikassheel_Janta_Party": "party_Vikassheel_Janta_Party", "party_India_Praja_Bandhu_Party": "party_India_Praja_Bandhu_Party", "party_Rashtrawadi_Party_of_India": "party_Rashtrawadi_Party_of_India", "Independent_183_1": "Independent_183_1", "Independent_183_2": "Independent_183_2", "Independent_183_3": "Independent_183_3", "Independent_183_4": "Independent_183_4", "Independent_183_5": "Independent_183_5", "Independent_183_6": "Independent_183_6", "Independent_183_7": "Independent_183_7", "Independent_184_1": "Independent_184_1", "Independent_184_2": "Independent_184_2", "Independent_184_3": "Independent_184_3", "Independent_184_4": "Independent_184_4", "Independent_185_1": "Independent_185_1", "Independent_185_2": "Independent_185_2", "Independent_186_1": "Independent_186_1", "Independent_186_2": "Independent_186_2", "Independent_186_3": "Independent_186_3", "party_Rashtriya_Democratic_Front": "party_Rashtriya_Democratic_Front", "Independent_187_1": "Independent_187_1", "party_Apna_Desh_Party": "party_Apna_Desh_Party", "Independent_187_2": "Independent_187_2", "Independent_188_1": "Independent_188_1", "party_Most_Backward_Classes_Of_India": "party_Most_Backward_Classes_Of_India", "Independent_191_1": "Independent_191_1", "Independent_191_2": "Independent_191_2", "Independent_192_1": "Independent_192_1", "Independent_193_1": "Independent_193_1", "Independent_193_2": "Independent_193_2", "Independent_193_3": "Independent_193_3", "Independent_193_4": "Independent_193_4", "Independent_193_5": "Independent_193_5", "party_Bharatiya_Nagrik_Party": "party_Bharatiya_Nagrik_Party", "Independent_193_6": "Independent_193_6", "Independent_194_1": "Independent_194_1", "Independent_194_2": "Independent_194_2", "party_Swatantra_Indian_Labour_Party": "party_Swatantra_Indian_Labour_Party", "Independent_195_1": "Independent_195_1", "Independent_195_2": "Independent_195_2", "Independent_195_3": "Independent_195_3", "Independent_195_4": "Independent_195_4", "Independent_196_1": "Independent_196_1", "Independent_196_2": "Independent_196_2", "Independent_196_3": "Independent_196_3", "Independent_196_4": "Independent_196_4", "Independent_196_5": "Independent_196_5", "Independent_197_1": "Independent_197_1", "Independent_197_2": "Independent_197_2", "Independent_197_3": "Independent_197_3", "party_Vikas_Insaf_Party": "party_Vikas_Insaf_Party", "party_Bhartiya_Vanchitsamaj_Party": "party_Bhartiya_Vanchitsamaj_Party", "Independent_198_1": "Independent_198_1", "Independent_198_2": "Independent_198_2", "Independent_198_3": "Independent_198_3", "Independent_199_1": "Independent_199_1", "Independent_199_2": "Independent_199_2", "Independent_200_1": "Independent_200_1", "Independent_200_2": "Independent_200_2", "Independent_200_3": "Independent_200_3", "Independent_201_1": "Independent_201_1", "Independent_201_2": "Independent_201_2", "Independent_202_1": "Independent_202_1", "Independent_202_2": "Independent_202_2", "party_Kisan_Majdoor_Berojgar_Sangh": "party_Kisan_Majdoor_Berojgar_Sangh", "Independent_203_1": "Independent_203_1", "Independent_203_2": "Independent_203_2", "Independent_204_1": "Independent_204_1", "Independent_204_2": "Independent_204_2", "Independent_204_3": "Independent_204_3", "Independent_204_4": "Independent_204_4", "Independent_205_1": "Independent_205_1", "Independent_205_2": "Independent_205_2", "Independent_205_3": "Independent_205_3", "Independent_205_4": "Independent_205_4", "Independent_205_5": "Independent_205_5", "Independent_206_1": "Independent_206_1", "Independent_206_2": "Independent_206_2", "Independent_206_3": "Independent_206_3", "Independent_207_1": "Independent_207_1", "Independent_207_2": "Independent_207_2", "Independent_207_3": "Independent_207_3", "Independent_208_1": "Independent_208_1", "Independent_208_2": "Independent_208_2", "Independent_209_1": "Independent_209_1", "Independent_209_2": "Independent_209_2", "Independent_209_3": "Independent_209_3", "party_Proutist_Bloc_India": "party_Proutist_Bloc_India", "Independent_213_1": "Independent_213_1", "Independent_214_1": "Independent_214_1", "party_Jan_Sangh_Party": "party_Jan_Sangh_Party", "Independent_215_1": "Independent_215_1", "party_Sabhi_Jan_Party": "party_Sabhi_Jan_Party", "Independent_216_1": "Independent_216_1", "party_Akhil_Bharatiya_Socialist_Party": "party_Akhil_Bharatiya_Socialist_Party", "party_Rashtriya_Ulama_Council": "party_Rashtriya_Ulama_Council", "Independent_217_1": "Independent_217_1", "Independent_217_2": "Independent_217_2", "party_Rashtriya_Janutthan_Party": "party_Rashtriya_Janutthan_Party", "party_Arjak_Adhikar_Dal": "party_Arjak_Adhikar_Dal", "Independent_218_1": "Independent_218_1", "Independent_219_1": "Independent_219_1", "Independent_219_2": "Independent_219_2", "Independent_219_3": "Independent_219_3", "Independent_219_4": "Independent_219_4", "Independent_219_5": "Independent_219_5", "party_NINSHAD": "party_NINSHAD", "Independent_220_1": "Independent_220_1", "Independent_220_2": "Independent_220_2", "Independent_220_3": "Independent_220_3", "party_Desh_Shakti_Party": "party_Desh_Shakti_Party", "party_Rashtriya_Jan_Manch": "party_Rashtriya_Jan_Manch", "Independent_221_1": "Independent_221_1", "Independent_221_2": "Independent_221_2", "Independent_221_3": "Independent_221_3", "Independent_222_1": "Independent_222_1", "Independent_222_2": "Independent_222_2", "Independent_222_3": "Independent_222_3", "party_Rashtriya_Sarvajan_Party": "party_Rashtriya_Sarvajan_Party", "Independent_223_1": "Independent_223_1", "party_Bundelkhand_Kranti_Dal": "party_Bundelkhand_Kranti_Dal", "Independent_224_1": "Independent_224_1", "Independent_225_1": "Independent_225_1", "Independent_225_2": "Independent_225_2", "Independent_225_3": "Independent_225_3", "party_Kisan_Raksha_Party": "party_Kisan_Raksha_Party", "Independent_225_4": "Independent_225_4", "Independent_225_5": "Independent_225_5", "Independent_225_6": "Independent_225_6", "Independent_226_1": "Independent_226_1", "Independent_226_2": "Independent_226_2", "Independent_226_3": "Independent_226_3", "Independent_226_4": "Independent_226_4", "party_Bhartiya_Lok_Satta_Party": "party_Bhartiya_Lok_Satta_Party", "Independent_227_1": "Independent_227_1", "Independent_227_2": "Independent_227_2", "Independent_227_3": "Independent_227_3", "Independent_227_4": "Independent_227_4", "Independent_227_5": "Independent_227_5", "Independent_229_1": "Independent_229_1", "Independent_229_2": "Independent_229_2", "Independent_230_1": "Independent_230_1", "Independent_230_2": "Independent_230_2", "Independent_230_3": "Independent_230_3", "Independent_230_4": "Independent_230_4", "Independent_230_5": "Independent_230_5", "Independent_230_6": "Independent_230_6", "Independent_231_1": "Independent_231_1", "Independent_231_2": "Independent_231_2", "Independent_232_1": "Independent_232_1", "Independent_232_2": "Independent_232_2", "Independent_232_3": "Independent_232_3", "Independent_236_1": "Independent_236_1", "party_Bundelkhand_Vikas_Dal": "party_Bundelkhand_Vikas_Dal", "Independent_237_1": "Independent_237_1", "Independent_237_2": "Independent_237_2", "party_Bharatiya_Samta_Samaj_Party": "party_Bharatiya_Samta_Samaj_Party", "party_Desh_Bachao_Party": "party_Desh_Bachao_Party", "Independent_239_1": "Independent_239_1", "Independent_240_1": "Independent_240_1", "party_Apni_Zindgi_Apna_Dal": "party_Apni_Zindgi_Apna_Dal", "Independent_241_1": "Independent_241_1", "Independent_241_2": "Independent_241_2", "party_Rashtriya_Krantikari_Samajwadi_Party": "party_Rashtriya_Krantikari_Samajwadi_Party", "Independent_242_1": "Independent_242_1", "Independent_243_1": "Independent_243_1", "Independent_243_2": "Independent_243_2", "Independent_243_3": "Independent_243_3", "Independent_244_1": "Independent_244_1", "Independent_244_2": "Independent_244_2", "party_Sarvodaya_Bharat_Party": "party_Sarvodaya_Bharat_Party", "party_Apana_Dal_Balihari_Party": "party_Apana_Dal_Balihari_Party", "Independent_245_1": "Independent_245_1", "Independent_245_2": "Independent_245_2", "Independent_246_1": "Independent_246_1", "Independent_246_2": "Independent_246_2", "Independent_246_3": "Independent_246_3", "Independent_246_4": "Independent_246_4", "Independent_246_5": "Independent_246_5", "Independent_247_1": "Independent_247_1", "party_Bharatiya_Sarvjan_Vikas_Party": "party_Bharatiya_Sarvjan_Vikas_Party", "Independent_247_2": "Independent_247_2", "Independent_247_3": "Independent_247_3", "Independent_247_4": "Independent_247_4", "party_Rashtriya_Janshanti_Party": "party_Rashtriya_Janshanti_Party", "party_Apna_Dal_Kamerawadi": "party_Apna_Dal_Kamerawadi", "Independent_248_1": "Independent_248_1", "Independent_248_2": "Independent_248_2", "Independent_248_3": "Independent_248_3", "party_Kisan_Party_Loktantrik": "party_Kisan_Party_Loktantrik", "Independent_249_1": "Independent_249_1", "Independent_250_1": "Independent_250_1", "party_Atal_Janshakti_Party": "party_Atal_Janshakti_Party", "Independent_250_2": "Independent_250_2", "party_Meydhaa_Party": "party_Meydhaa_Party", "Independent_251_1": "Independent_251_1", "Independent_251_2": "Independent_251_2", "Independent_251_3": "Independent_251_3", "Independent_251_4": "Independent_251_4", "Independent_251_5": "Independent_251_5", "party_Samarth_Kisan_Party": "party_Samarth_Kisan_Party", "Independent_252_1": "Independent_252_1", "Independent_252_2": "Independent_252_2", "Independent_252_3": "Independent_252_3", "Independent_253_1": "Independent_253_1", "Independent_253_2": "Independent_253_2", "Independent_253_3": "Independent_253_3", "Independent_253_4": "Independent_253_4", "Independent_253_5": "Independent_253_5", "Independent_254_1": "Independent_254_1", "Independent_254_2": "Independent_254_2", "Independent_254_3": "Independent_254_3", "party_Yuva_Vikas_Party": "party_Yuva_Vikas_Party", "Independent_254_4": "Independent_254_4", "Independent_254_5": "Independent_254_5", "Independent_254_6": "Independent_254_6", "party_Jan_Jan_United_Party": "party_Jan_Jan_United_Party", "Independent_254_7": "Independent_254_7", "party_Samyak_Party": "party_Samyak_Party", "Independent_255_1": "Independent_255_1", "party_Ambedkarite_Party_of_India": "party_Ambedkarite_Party_of_India", "party_Lok_Samaj_Party": "party_Lok_Samaj_Party", "Independent_256_1": "Independent_256_1", "Independent_256_2": "Independent_256_2", "Independent_256_3": "Independent_256_3", "party_Bhartiya_Kamgar_Party": "party_Bhartiya_Kamgar_Party", "party_Bharat_Vaibhav_Party": "party_Bharat_Vaibhav_Party", "Independent_257_1": "Independent_257_1", "party_Janadhar_Shakti_Party": "party_Janadhar_Shakti_Party", "party_Pragatisheel_Manav_Samaj_Party": "party_Pragatisheel_Manav_Samaj_Party", "Independent_257_2": "Independent_257_2", "Independent_257_3": "Independent_257_3", "Independent_257_4": "Independent_257_4", "Independent_257_5": "Independent_257_5", "Independent_257_6": "Independent_257_6", "Independent_257_7": "Independent_257_7", "Independent_257_8": "Independent_257_8", "Independent_258_1": "Independent_258_1", "Independent_258_2": "Independent_258_2", "Independent_258_3": "Independent_258_3", "Independent_258_4": "Independent_258_4", "Independent_260_1": "Independent_260_1", "Independent_260_2": "Independent_260_2", "party_Sanatan_Sanskriti_Raksha_Dal": "party_Sanatan_Sanskriti_Raksha_Dal", "Independent_261_1": "Independent_261_1", "Independent_261_2": "Independent_261_2", "Independent_261_3": "Independent_261_3", "Independent_261_4": "Independent_261_4", "party_National_Democratic_Peoples_Front": "party_National_Democratic_Peoples_Front", "party_Rashtravadi_Vikas_Party": "party_Rashtravadi_Vikas_Party", "Independent_262_1": "Independent_262_1", "Independent_263_1": "Independent_263_1", "Independent_263_2": "Independent_263_2", "Independent_263_3": "Independent_263_3", "party_Ambedkar_Yug_Party": "party_Ambedkar_Yug_Party", "Independent_264_1": "Independent_264_1", "party_Jan_Kalyan_Party": "party_Jan_Kalyan_Party", "Independent_264_2": "Independent_264_2", "Independent_264_3": "Independent_264_3", "party_CPM": "party_CPM", "Independent_266_1": "Independent_266_1", "Independent_267_1": "Independent_267_1", "Independent_267_2": "Independent_267_2", "party_Bhartiya_Drishtigochar_Party": "party_Bhartiya_Drishtigochar_Party", "Independent_270_1": "Independent_270_1", "party_Rashtrawadi_Kisan_Kranti_Dal": "party_Rashtrawadi_Kisan_Kranti_Dal", "Independent_271_1": "Independent_271_1", "Independent_272_1": "Independent_272_1", "Independent_273_1": "Independent_273_1", "party_Rashtriya_Bhagidari_Party": "party_Rashtriya_Bhagidari_Party", "Independent_274_1": "Independent_274_1", "party_Jan_Adhikar_Party_Loktantrik": "party_Jan_Adhikar_Party_Loktantrik", "party_Adarshwaadi_Congress_Party": "party_Adarshwaadi_Congress_Party", "Independent_276_1": "Independent_276_1", "Independent_278_1": "Independent_278_1", "Independent_278_2": "Independent_278_2", "Independent_279_1": "Independent_279_1", "Independent_280_1": "Independent_280_1", "Independent_281_1": "Independent_281_1", "Independent_281_2": "Independent_281_2", "party_Rashtriya_Jan_Sahyog_Party": "party_Rashtriya_Jan_Sahyog_Party", "Independent_282_1": "Independent_282_1", "Independent_282_2": "Independent_282_2", "Independent_282_3": "Independent_282_3", "Independent_283_1": "Independent_283_1", "Independent_283_2": "Independent_283_2", "Independent_283_3": "Independent_283_3", "Independent_283_4": "Independent_283_4", "Independent_283_5": "Independent_283_5", "Independent_284_1": "Independent_284_1", "Independent_284_2": "Independent_284_2", "Independent_284_3": "Independent_284_3", "Independent_284_4": "Independent_284_4", "party_Sarvajan_Hitay_Party": "party_Sarvajan_Hitay_Party", "Independent_285_1": "Independent_285_1", "Independent_286_1": "Independent_286_1", "Independent_286_2": "Independent_286_2", "Independent_287_1": "Independent_287_1", "Independent_287_2": "Independent_287_2", "Independent_288_1": "Independent_288_1", "Independent_288_2": "Independent_288_2", "Independent_288_3": "Independent_288_3", "Independent_288_4": "Independent_288_4", "Independent_289_1": "Independent_289_1", "party_Bahujan_Maha_Party": "party_Bahujan_Maha_Party", "Independent_289_2": "Independent_289_2", "party_Rashtriya_Jantantrik_Bharat_Vikas_Party": "party_Rashtriya_Jantantrik_Bharat_Vikas_Party", "Independent_290_1": "Independent_290_1", "Independent_291_1": "Independent_291_1", "Independent_291_2": "Independent_291_2", "Independent_291_3": "Independent_291_3", "Independent_291_4": "Independent_291_4", "Independent_291_5": "Independent_291_5", "Independent_291_6": "Independent_291_6", "Independent_291_7": "Independent_291_7", "Independent_291_8": "Independent_291_8", "Independent_292_1": "Independent_292_1", "party_Republican_Sena": "party_Republican_Sena", "Independent_293_1": "Independent_293_1", "Independent_293_2": "Independent_293_2", "Independent_293_3": "Independent_293_3", "Independent_293_4": "Independent_293_4", "Independent_293_5": "Independent_293_5", "Independent_294_1": "Independent_294_1", "Independent_294_2": "Independent_294_2", "Independent_295_1": "Independent_295_1", "Independent_295_2": "Independent_295_2", "Independent_295_3": "Independent_295_3", "Independent_296_1": "Independent_296_1", "Independent_296_2": "Independent_296_2", "Independent_296_3": "Independent_296_3", "Independent_296_4": "Independent_296_4", "Independent_296_5": "Independent_296_5", "Independent_296_6": "Independent_296_6", "Independent_296_7": "Independent_296_7", "Independent_297_1": "Independent_297_1", "Independent_297_2": "Independent_297_2", "Independent_297_3": "Independent_297_3", "Independent_297_4": "Independent_297_4", "Independent_297_5": "Independent_297_5", "Independent_297_6": "Independent_297_6", "Independent_297_7": "Independent_297_7", "Independent_298_1": "Independent_298_1", "Independent_298_2": "Independent_298_2", "Independent_298_3": "Independent_298_3", "Independent_298_4": "Independent_298_4", "Independent_299_1": "Independent_299_1", "Independent_299_2": "Independent_299_2", "Independent_299_3": "Independent_299_3", "Independent_299_4": "Independent_299_4", "party_Samrat_Ashok_Sena_Party": "party_Samrat_Ashok_Sena_Party", "Independent_300_1": "Independent_300_1", "Independent_300_2": "Independent_300_2", "Independent_300_3": "Independent_300_3", "Independent_300_4": "Independent_300_4", "Independent_301_1": "Independent_301_1", "Independent_301_2": "Independent_301_2", "Independent_301_3": "Independent_301_3", "Independent_302_1": "Independent_302_1", "Independent_302_2": "Independent_302_2", "Independent_302_3": "Independent_302_3", "party_Nationalist_Janshakti_Party": "party_Nationalist_Janshakti_Party", "Independent_303_1": "Independent_303_1", "party_Samajhdar_Party": "party_Samajhdar_Party", "Independent_304_1": "Independent_304_1", "party_Bharatiya_Eklavya_Party": "party_Bharatiya_Eklavya_Party", "Independent_304_2": "Independent_304_2", "party_Abhay_Samaj_Party": "party_Abhay_Samaj_Party", "Independent_305_1": "Independent_305_1", "Independent_306_1": "Independent_306_1", "Independent_306_2": "Independent_306_2", "party_Republican_Bahujan_Sena": "party_Republican_Bahujan_Sena", "Independent_306_3": "Independent_306_3", "Independent_307_1": "Independent_307_1", "Independent_307_2": "Independent_307_2", "Independent_307_3": "Independent_307_3", "Independent_308_1": "Independent_308_1", "Independent_308_2": "Independent_308_2", "Independent_308_3": "Independent_308_3", "Independent_309_1": "Independent_309_1", "Independent_309_2": "Independent_309_2", "Independent_309_3": "Independent_309_3", "Independent_309_4": "Independent_309_4", "party_Bharat_Mahaparivar_Party": "party_Bharat_Mahaparivar_Party", "Independent_310_1": "Independent_310_1", "party_Janhit_Kisan_Party": "party_Janhit_Kisan_Party", "Independent_311_1": "Independent_311_1", "Independent_312_1": "Independent_312_1", "Independent_312_2": "Independent_312_2", "party_Sarvjan_Awaz_Party": "party_Sarvjan_Awaz_Party", "Independent_313_1": "Independent_313_1", "Independent_313_2": "Independent_313_2", "party_INL": "party_INL", "Independent_313_3": "Independent_313_3", "Independent_313_4": "Independent_313_4", "Independent_313_5": "Independent_313_5", "Independent_314_1": "Independent_314_1", "Independent_314_2": "Independent_314_2", "party_Shoshit_Samaj_Dal": "party_Shoshit_Samaj_Dal", "Independent_314_3": "Independent_314_3", "Independent_315_1": "Independent_315_1", "Independent_316_1": "Independent_316_1", "Independent_316_2": "Independent_316_2", "Independent_316_3": "Independent_316_3", "Independent_317_1": "Independent_317_1", "Independent_317_2": "Independent_317_2", "Independent_317_3": "Independent_317_3", "Independent_317_4": "Independent_317_4", "party_LJD": "party_LJD", "Independent_318_1": "Independent_318_1", "Independent_318_2": "Independent_318_2", "Independent_319_1": "Independent_319_1", "Independent_319_2": "Independent_319_2", "Independent_319_3": "Independent_319_3", "Independent_319_4": "Independent_319_4", "Independent_319_5": "Independent_319_5", "party_Bharatiya_Apna_Samaj_Party": "party_Bharatiya_Apna_Samaj_Party", "Independent_320_1": "Independent_320_1", "party_Bhartiya_Kisan_Union_Samaj_Party": "party_Bhartiya_Kisan_Union_Samaj_Party", "Independent_320_2": "Independent_320_2", "Independent_320_3": "Independent_320_3", "Independent_321_1": "Independent_321_1", "Independent_321_2": "Independent_321_2", "party_Lokpriya_Samaj_Party": "party_Lokpriya_Samaj_Party", "Independent_321_3": "Independent_321_3", "Independent_321_4": "Independent_321_4", "Independent_322_1": "Independent_322_1", "Independent_322_2": "Independent_322_2", "Independent_322_3": "Independent_322_3", "Independent_323_1": "Independent_323_1", "Independent_323_2": "Independent_323_2", "Independent_324_1": "Independent_324_1", "Independent_324_2": "Independent_324_2", "Independent_324_3": "Independent_324_3", "Independent_325_1": "Independent_325_1", "party_Adim_Bhartiya_Dal": "party_Adim_Bhartiya_Dal", "Independent_326_1": "Independent_326_1", "Independent_326_2": "Independent_326_2", "Independent_326_3": "Independent_326_3", "Independent_327_1": "Independent_327_1", "Independent_329_1": "Independent_329_1", "Independent_329_2": "Independent_329_2", "Independent_329_3": "Independent_329_3", "Independent_330_1": "Independent_330_1", "Independent_330_2": "Independent_330_2", "Independent_330_3": "Independent_330_3", "Independent_330_4": "Independent_330_4", "Independent_330_5": "Independent_330_5", "Independent_330_6": "Independent_330_6", "party_Aam_Janata_Party": "party_Aam_Janata_Party", "Independent_330_7": "Independent_330_7", "Independent_331_1": "Independent_331_1", "Independent_331_2": "Independent_331_2", "Independent_331_3": "Independent_331_3", "Independent_332_1": "Independent_332_1", "Independent_332_2": "Independent_332_2", "Independent_332_3": "Independent_332_3", "Independent_332_4": "Independent_332_4", "Independent_332_5": "Independent_332_5", "Independent_332_6": "Independent_332_6", "Independent_333_1": "Independent_333_1", "Independent_333_2": "Independent_333_2", "Independent_333_3": "Independent_333_3", "Independent_333_4": "Independent_333_4", "Independent_333_5": "Independent_333_5", "party_Bharatiya_Swajivi_Nagrik_Party": "party_Bharatiya_Swajivi_Nagrik_Party", "Independent_334_1": "Independent_334_1", "Independent_334_2": "Independent_334_2", "Independent_334_3": "Independent_334_3", "party_Satya_Kranti_Party": "party_Satya_Kranti_Party", "Independent_335_1": "Independent_335_1", "Independent_335_2": "Independent_335_2", "Independent_335_3": "Independent_335_3", "Independent_336_1": "Independent_336_1", "Independent_336_2": "Independent_336_2", "Independent_336_3": "Independent_336_3", "Independent_336_4": "Independent_336_4", "party_Rastriya_Hind_Samaj_Party": "party_Rastriya_Hind_Samaj_Party", "party_Bhartiya_Sarvjan_Party": "party_Bhartiya_Sarvjan_Party", "Independent_337_1": "Independent_337_1", "party_Moderate_Party": "party_Moderate_Party", "party_Hindu_Samaj_Party": "party_Hindu_Samaj_Party", "party_Apna_Dal_United_Party": "party_Apna_Dal_United_Party", "Independent_339_1": "Independent_339_1", "Independent_339_2": "Independent_339_2", "Independent_339_3": "Independent_339_3", "party_Hindustan_Janmorcha": "party_Hindustan_Janmorcha", "Independent_342_1": "Independent_342_1", "Independent_342_2": "Independent_342_2", "Independent_343_1": "Independent_343_1", "Independent_343_2": "Independent_343_2", "party_Rashtrawadi_Janwadi_Manch": "party_Rashtrawadi_Janwadi_Manch", "Independent_344_1": "Independent_344_1", "Independent_345_1": "Independent_345_1", "Independent_345_2": "Independent_345_2", "Independent_345_3": "Independent_345_3", "Independent_345_4": "Independent_345_4", "Independent_346_1": "Independent_346_1", "Independent_346_2": "Independent_346_2", "party_Jan_Raajya_Party": "party_Jan_Raajya_Party", "party_Bhartiya_Sabka_Dal": "party_Bhartiya_Sabka_Dal", "Independent_347_1": "Independent_347_1", "party_Bhartiya_Gadar_Party_S": "party_Bhartiya_Gadar_Party_S", "Independent_348_1": "Independent_348_1", "Independent_348_2": "Independent_348_2", "party_Bahujan_Kranti_Party_Marxwad_Ambedkarwad": "party_Bahujan_Kranti_Party_Marxwad_Ambedkarwad", "Independent_349_1": "Independent_349_1", "Independent_349_2": "Independent_349_2", "Independent_349_3": "Independent_349_3", "Independent_349_4": "Independent_349_4", "party_Sarva_Samaj_Janata_Party": "party_Sarva_Samaj_Janata_Party", "Independent_350_1": "Independent_350_1", "Independent_350_2": "Independent_350_2", "Independent_350_3": "Independent_350_3", "Independent_350_4": "Independent_350_4", "Independent_351_1": "Independent_351_1", "Independent_353_1": "Independent_353_1", "Independent_353_2": "Independent_353_2", "Independent_353_3": "Independent_353_3", "Independent_353_4": "Independent_353_4", "party_Watan_Janta_Party": "party_Watan_Janta_Party", "Independent_354_1": "Independent_354_1", "Independent_355_1": "Independent_355_1", "Independent_355_2": "Independent_355_2", "party_Janta_Kranti_Party_Rashtravadi": "party_Janta_Kranti_Party_Rashtravadi", "Independent_356_1": "Independent_356_1", "Independent_356_2": "Independent_356_2", "Independent_356_3": "Independent_356_3", "Independent_356_4": "Independent_356_4", "Independent_357_1": "Independent_357_1", "Independent_357_2": "Independent_357_2", "Independent_357_3": "Independent_357_3", "Independent_357_4": "Independent_357_4", "Independent_357_5": "Independent_357_5", "Independent_357_6": "Independent_357_6", "party_Janlok_Vikas_Party": "party_Janlok_Vikas_Party", "Independent_358_1": "Independent_358_1", "Independent_358_2": "Independent_358_2", "Independent_358_3": "Independent_358_3", "Independent_358_4": "Independent_358_4", "Independent_359_1": "Independent_359_1", "Independent_359_2": "Independent_359_2", "Independent_359_3": "Independent_359_3", "Independent_359_4": "Independent_359_4", "Independent_360_1": "Independent_360_1", "party_Bharatiya_Suheldev_Janata_Party": "party_Bharatiya_Suheldev_Janata_Party", "Independent_360_2": "Independent_360_2", "Independent_360_3": "Independent_360_3", "party_Rashtriya_Yuva_Morcha_Dal": "party_Rashtriya_Yuva_Morcha_Dal", "Independent_361_1": "Independent_361_1", "Independent_361_2": "Independent_361_2", "Independent_361_3": "Independent_361_3", "party_Swadesh_Jan_Sewak_Party": "party_Swadesh_Jan_Sewak_Party", "Independent_362_1": "Independent_362_1", "Independent_362_2": "Independent_362_2", "Independent_362_3": "Independent_362_3", "party_Hum_Sabki_Party": "party_Hum_Sabki_Party", "Independent_364_1": "Independent_364_1", "Independent_364_2": "Independent_364_2", "party_Aapki_Apni_Party_Peoples": "party_Aapki_Apni_Party_Peoples", "party_Bharatiya_Nav_Kranti_Party": "party_Bharatiya_Nav_Kranti_Party", "Independent_365_1": "Independent_365_1", "party_Rashtriya_Jan_Gaurav_Party": "party_Rashtriya_Jan_Gaurav_Party", "Independent_366_1": "Independent_366_1", "Independent_366_2": "Independent_366_2", "Independent_366_3": "Independent_366_3", "Independent_366_4": "Independent_366_4", "Independent_366_5": "Independent_366_5", "Independent_367_1": "Independent_367_1", "Independent_368_1": "Independent_368_1", "Independent_368_2": "Independent_368_2", "party_Moolniwasi_Samaj_Party": "party_Moolniwasi_Samaj_Party", "party_Samaj_Parivartan_Party": "party_Samaj_Parivartan_Party", "Independent_370_1": "Independent_370_1", "Independent_371_1": "Independent_371_1", "Independent_372_1": "Independent_372_1", "party_Marxist_Communist_Party_of_India_United": "party_Marxist_Communist_Party_of_India_United", "Independent_373_1": "Independent_373_1", "Independent_374_1": "Independent_374_1", "Independent_374_2": "Independent_374_2", "Independent_374_3": "Independent_374_3", "Independent_375_1": "Independent_375_1", "Independent_375_2": "Independent_375_2", "Independent_375_3": "Independent_375_3", "Independent_375_4": "Independent_375_4", "Independent_375_5": "Independent_375_5", "party_Hamdard_Party": "party_Hamdard_Party", "Independent_375_6": "Independent_375_6", "Independent_376_1": "Independent_376_1", "Independent_376_2": "Independent_376_2", "party_Rashtriya_Lok_Janta_Party": "party_Rashtriya_Lok_Janta_Party", "Independent_378_1": "Independent_378_1", "Independent_378_2": "Independent_378_2", "Independent_378_3": "Independent_378_3", "Independent_379_1": "Independent_379_1", "Independent_379_2": "Independent_379_2", "Independent_379_3": "Independent_379_3", "Independent_379_4": "Independent_379_4", "Independent_379_5": "Independent_379_5", "party_Samagra_Utthan_Party": "party_Samagra_Utthan_Party", "Independent_380_1": "Independent_380_1", "Independent_380_2": "Independent_380_2", "party_Rashtriya_Krishak_Dal": "party_Rashtriya_Krishak_Dal", "party_Janta_Raj_Party": "party_Janta_Raj_Party", "Independent_382_1": "Independent_382_1", "Independent_382_2": "Independent_382_2", "Independent_382_3": "Independent_382_3", "Independent_383_1": "Independent_383_1", "Independent_383_2": "Independent_383_2", "party_Sarvjan_Sanatan_Party": "party_Sarvjan_Sanatan_Party", "Independent_384_1": "Independent_384_1", "Independent_385_1": "Independent_385_1", "Independent_385_2": "Independent_385_2", "party_Rashtriya_Vikas_Manch_Party": "party_Rashtriya_Vikas_Manch_Party", "Independent_387_1": "Independent_387_1", "Independent_388_1": "Independent_388_1", "Independent_389_1": "Independent_389_1", "Independent_390_1": "Independent_390_1", "Independent_391_1": "Independent_391_1", "party_Insaafwadi_Party": "party_Insaafwadi_Party", "Independent_392_1": "Independent_392_1", "party_Swarna_Bharat_Party": "party_Swarna_Bharat_Party", "party_Bhartiya_Manav_Samaj_Party": "party_Bhartiya_Manav_Samaj_Party", "Independent_393_1": "Independent_393_1", "party_Anjaan_Aadmi_Party": "party_Anjaan_Aadmi_Party", "Independent_396_1": "Independent_396_1", "Independent_396_2": "Independent_396_2", "party_Gareeb_Samana_Party": "party_Gareeb_Samana_Party", "Independent_397_1": "Independent_397_1", "Independent_398_1": "Independent_398_1", "party_Bhartiya_Republican_Party_Insan": "party_Bhartiya_Republican_Party_Insan", "Independent_400_1": "Independent_400_1", "Independent_400_2": "Independent_400_2", "Independent_401_1": "Independent_401_1", "Independent_402_1": "Independent_402_1", "Independent_403_1": "Independent_403_1", "Independent_403_2": "Independent_403_2", "Independent_403_3": "Independent_403_3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 403, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 403, "registered_not_positive": 403}, "n_stations_flagged": 403, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:30:39.181194", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.384, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.291, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.384, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.384, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.291, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.291, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.553, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.764, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.442, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 403}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3614580b440a4e59a4ab0a95d1c6cd9b", "name": "India 2021 local (overnight india-west-bengal-2021-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/West_Bengal/West_Bengal_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AITC": "AITC", "BJP": "BJP", "AIFB": "AIFB", "NOTA": "NOTA", "SUCI": "SUCI", "BSP": "BSP", "Independent_1_MEKLIGANJ_1": "Independent_1_MEKLIGANJ_1", "Kamatapur_People_s_Party_United": "Kamatapur_People_s_Party_United", "Independent_1_MEKLIGANJ_2": "Independent_1_MEKLIGANJ_2", "Amra_Bangalee": "Amra_Bangalee", "CPM": "CPM", "Independent_2_MATHABHANGA_1": "Independent_2_MATHABHANGA_1", "Independent_2_MATHABHANGA_2": "Independent_2_MATHABHANGA_2", "Independent_3_COOCH_BEHAR_UTTAR_1": "Independent_3_COOCH_BEHAR_UTTAR_1", "Independent_4_COOCH_BEHAR_DAKSHIN_1": "Independent_4_COOCH_BEHAR_DAKSHIN_1", "Independent_4_COOCH_BEHAR_DAKSHIN_2": "Independent_4_COOCH_BEHAR_DAKSHIN_2", "Independent_4_COOCH_BEHAR_DAKSHIN_3": "Independent_4_COOCH_BEHAR_DAKSHIN_3", "Independent_5_SITALKUCHI_1": "Independent_5_SITALKUCHI_1", "INC": "INC", "Independent_6_SITAI_1": "Independent_6_SITAI_1", "Independent_6_SITAI_2": "Independent_6_SITAI_2", "Independent_6_SITAI_3": "Independent_6_SITAI_3", "LJP": "LJP", "Independent_7_DINHATA_1": "Independent_7_DINHATA_1", "Independent_7_DINHATA_2": "Independent_7_DINHATA_2", "Independent_8_NATABARI_1": "Independent_8_NATABARI_1", "United_Socialist_Party": "United_Socialist_Party", "Independent_9_TUFANGANJ_1": "Independent_9_TUFANGANJ_1", "Independent_9_TUFANGANJ_2": "Independent_9_TUFANGANJ_2", "Independent_9_TUFANGANJ_3": "Independent_9_TUFANGANJ_3", "RSP": "RSP", "Independent_10_KUMARGRAM_1": "Independent_10_KUMARGRAM_1", "JD_U": "JD_U", "Bahujan_Mukti_Party": "Bahujan_Mukti_Party", "Independent_11_KALCHINI_1": "Independent_11_KALCHINI_1", "Independent_11_KALCHINI_2": "Independent_11_KALCHINI_2", "Independent_11_KALCHINI_3": "Independent_11_KALCHINI_3", "Independent_11_KALCHINI_4": "Independent_11_KALCHINI_4", "NPP": "NPP", "Independent_12_ALIPURDUARS_1": "Independent_12_ALIPURDUARS_1", "Independent_12_ALIPURDUARS_2": "Independent_12_ALIPURDUARS_2", "Independent_12_ALIPURDUARS_3": "Independent_12_ALIPURDUARS_3", "Independent_12_ALIPURDUARS_4": "Independent_12_ALIPURDUARS_4", "Independent_12_ALIPURDUARS_5": "Independent_12_ALIPURDUARS_5", "Independent_13_FALAKATA_1": "Independent_13_FALAKATA_1", "Independent_13_FALAKATA_2": "Independent_13_FALAKATA_2", "Samajwadi_Jan_Parishad": "Samajwadi_Jan_Parishad", "Bhartiya_Tribal_Party": "Bhartiya_Tribal_Party", "Independent_15_DHUPGURI_1": "Independent_15_DHUPGURI_1", "Independent_15_DHUPGURI_2": "Independent_15_DHUPGURI_2", "CPI_ML_L": "CPI_ML_L", "Independent_16_MAYNAGURI_1": "Independent_16_MAYNAGURI_1", "Independent_17_JALPAIGURI_1": "Independent_17_JALPAIGURI_1", "Independent_17_JALPAIGURI_2": "Independent_17_JALPAIGURI_2", "Independent_17_JALPAIGURI_3": "Independent_17_JALPAIGURI_3", "Independent_17_JALPAIGURI_4": "Independent_17_JALPAIGURI_4", "Independent_18_RAJGANJ_1": "Independent_18_RAJGANJ_1", "Independent_19_DABGRAM_PHULBARI_1": "Independent_19_DABGRAM_PHULBARI_1", "Independent_19_DABGRAM_PHULBARI_2": "Independent_19_DABGRAM_PHULBARI_2", "Independent_19_DABGRAM_PHULBARI_3": "Independent_19_DABGRAM_PHULBARI_3", "Republican_Party_of_India_A": "Republican_Party_of_India_A", "Independent_20_MAL_1": "Independent_20_MAL_1", "Independent_21_NAGRAKATA_1": "Independent_21_NAGRAKATA_1", "Progressive_People_s_Party": "Progressive_People_s_Party", "Independent_21_NAGRAKATA_2": "Independent_21_NAGRAKATA_2", "Independent_22_KALIMPONG_1": "Independent_22_KALIMPONG_1", "Independent_22_KALIMPONG_2": "Independent_22_KALIMPONG_2", "Independent_22_KALIMPONG_3": "Independent_22_KALIMPONG_3", "Independent_22_KALIMPONG_4": "Independent_22_KALIMPONG_4", "Independent_22_KALIMPONG_5": "Independent_22_KALIMPONG_5", "Independent_23_DARJEELING_1": "Independent_23_DARJEELING_1", "Independent_23_DARJEELING_2": "Independent_23_DARJEELING_2", "Independent_23_DARJEELING_3": "Independent_23_DARJEELING_3", "Independent_23_DARJEELING_4": "Independent_23_DARJEELING_4", "Independent_23_DARJEELING_5": "Independent_23_DARJEELING_5", "Independent_23_DARJEELING_6": "Independent_23_DARJEELING_6", "Independent_23_DARJEELING_7": "Independent_23_DARJEELING_7", "Independent_24_KURSEONG_1": "Independent_24_KURSEONG_1", "Independent_24_KURSEONG_2": "Independent_24_KURSEONG_2", "Independent_24_KURSEONG_3": "Independent_24_KURSEONG_3", "Independent_24_KURSEONG_4": "Independent_24_KURSEONG_4", "Independent_24_KURSEONG_5": "Independent_24_KURSEONG_5", "Independent_24_KURSEONG_6": "Independent_24_KURSEONG_6", "Independent_25_MATIGARA_NAXALBARI_1": "Independent_25_MATIGARA_NAXALBARI_1", "Independent_26_SILIGURI_1": "Independent_26_SILIGURI_1", "RPI_A": "RPI_A", "Independent_28_CHOPRA_1": "Independent_28_CHOPRA_1", "Independent_29_ISLAMPUR_1": "Independent_29_ISLAMPUR_1", "Independent_30_GOALPOKHAR_1": "Independent_30_GOALPOKHAR_1", "Independent_30_GOALPOKHAR_2": "Independent_30_GOALPOKHAR_2", "Independent_31_CHAKULIA_1": "Independent_31_CHAKULIA_1", "Independent_32_KARANDIGHI_1": "Independent_32_KARANDIGHI_1", "Independent_32_KARANDIGHI_2": "Independent_32_KARANDIGHI_2", "Independent_32_KARANDIGHI_3": "Independent_32_KARANDIGHI_3", "Independent_32_KARANDIGHI_4": "Independent_32_KARANDIGHI_4", "Independent_33_HEMTABAD_1": "Independent_33_HEMTABAD_1", "Independent_33_HEMTABAD_2": "Independent_33_HEMTABAD_2", "Independent_34_KALIAGANJ_1": "Independent_34_KALIAGANJ_1", "Independent_34_KALIAGANJ_2": "Independent_34_KALIAGANJ_2", "Independent_34_KALIAGANJ_3": "Independent_34_KALIAGANJ_3", "Independent_34_KALIAGANJ_4": "Independent_34_KALIAGANJ_4", "Independent_34_KALIAGANJ_5": "Independent_34_KALIAGANJ_5", "Independent_35_RAIGANJ_1": "Independent_35_RAIGANJ_1", "Independent_35_RAIGANJ_2": "Independent_35_RAIGANJ_2", "Independent_35_RAIGANJ_3": "Independent_35_RAIGANJ_3", "Independent_35_RAIGANJ_4": "Independent_35_RAIGANJ_4", "Independent_35_RAIGANJ_5": "Independent_35_RAIGANJ_5", "CPI": "CPI", "Independent_36_ITAHAR_1": "Independent_36_ITAHAR_1", "AIMIM": "AIMIM", "Independent_36_ITAHAR_2": "Independent_36_ITAHAR_2", "Independent_36_ITAHAR_3": "Independent_36_ITAHAR_3", "Independent_36_ITAHAR_4": "Independent_36_ITAHAR_4", "Independent_37_KUSHMANDI_1": "Independent_37_KUSHMANDI_1", "Communist_Party_of_India_Marxist_Leninist_Red_Star": "Communist_Party_of_India_Marxist_Leninist_Red_Star", "Independent_42_HARIRAMPUR_1": "Independent_42_HARIRAMPUR_1", "Independent_42_HARIRAMPUR_2": "Independent_42_HARIRAMPUR_2", "Independent_42_HARIRAMPUR_3": "Independent_42_HARIRAMPUR_3", "Ambedkarite_Party_of_India": "Ambedkarite_Party_of_India", "Independent_43_HABIBPUR_1": "Independent_43_HABIBPUR_1", "Independent_43_HABIBPUR_2": "Independent_43_HABIBPUR_2", "Independent_43_HABIBPUR_3": "Independent_43_HABIBPUR_3", "Independent_44_GAZOLE_1": "Independent_44_GAZOLE_1", "Independent_45_CHANCHAL_1": "Independent_45_CHANCHAL_1", "Independent_46_HARISCHANDRAPUR_1": "Independent_46_HARISCHANDRAPUR_1", "Independent_46_HARISCHANDRAPUR_2": "Independent_46_HARISCHANDRAPUR_2", "Independent_48_RATUA_1": "Independent_48_RATUA_1", "Welfare_Party_Of_India": "Welfare_Party_Of_India", "Independent_48_RATUA_2": "Independent_48_RATUA_2", "Independent_48_RATUA_3": "Independent_48_RATUA_3", "Independent_48_RATUA_4": "Independent_48_RATUA_4", "Independent_49_MANICKCHAK_1": "Independent_49_MANICKCHAK_1", "Independent_49_MANICKCHAK_2": "Independent_49_MANICKCHAK_2", "Independent_49_MANICKCHAK_3": "Independent_49_MANICKCHAK_3", "Independent_50_MALDAHA_1": "Independent_50_MALDAHA_1", "Independent_50_MALDAHA_2": "Independent_50_MALDAHA_2", "Independent_51_ENGLISHBAZAR_1": "Independent_51_ENGLISHBAZAR_1", "Independent_51_ENGLISHBAZAR_2": "Independent_51_ENGLISHBAZAR_2", "Independent_51_ENGLISHBAZAR_3": "Independent_51_ENGLISHBAZAR_3", "Independent_51_ENGLISHBAZAR_4": "Independent_51_ENGLISHBAZAR_4", "RSSCMJP": "RSSCMJP", "Independent_52_MOTHABARI_1": "Independent_52_MOTHABARI_1", "Independent_52_MOTHABARI_2": "Independent_52_MOTHABARI_2", "IUML": "IUML", "Independent_52_MOTHABARI_3": "Independent_52_MOTHABARI_3", "Independent_53_SUJAPUR_1": "Independent_53_SUJAPUR_1", "Party_for_Democratic_Socialism": "Party_for_Democratic_Socialism", "Independent_53_SUJAPUR_2": "Independent_53_SUJAPUR_2", "Independent_53_SUJAPUR_3": "Independent_53_SUJAPUR_3", "Jamat_E_Seratul_Mustakim": "Jamat_E_Seratul_Mustakim", "Independent_54_BAISHNAB_NAGAR_1": "Independent_54_BAISHNAB_NAGAR_1", "Independent_54_BAISHNAB_NAGAR_2": "Independent_54_BAISHNAB_NAGAR_2", "Independent_54_BAISHNAB_NAGAR_3": "Independent_54_BAISHNAB_NAGAR_3", "Independent_55_FARAKKA_1": "Independent_55_FARAKKA_1", "Independent_55_FARAKKA_2": "Independent_55_FARAKKA_2", "Independent_56_SAMSERGANJ_1": "Independent_56_SAMSERGANJ_1", "SDPI": "SDPI", "Independent_57_SUTI_1": "Independent_57_SUTI_1", "Independent_57_SUTI_2": "Independent_57_SUTI_2", "Independent_57_SUTI_3": "Independent_57_SUTI_3", "Independent_58_JANGIPUR_1": "Independent_58_JANGIPUR_1", "Independent_58_JANGIPUR_2": "Independent_58_JANGIPUR_2", "JSTDVPMTP": "JSTDVPMTP", "Independent_58_JANGIPUR_3": "Independent_58_JANGIPUR_3", "BAHUMP": "BAHUMP", "Independent_59_RAGHUNATHGANJ_1": "Independent_59_RAGHUNATHGANJ_1", "Independent_60_SAGARDIGHI_1": "Independent_60_SAGARDIGHI_1", "Independent_61_LALGOLA_1": "Independent_61_LALGOLA_1", "Independent_62_BHAGABANGOLA_1": "Independent_62_BHAGABANGOLA_1", "Independent_62_BHAGABANGOLA_2": "Independent_62_BHAGABANGOLA_2", "Bahujan_Maha_Party": "Bahujan_Maha_Party", "Independent_62_BHAGABANGOLA_3": "Independent_62_BHAGABANGOLA_3", "Independent_63_RANINAGAR_1": "Independent_63_RANINAGAR_1", "Independent_63_RANINAGAR_2": "Independent_63_RANINAGAR_2", "Independent_63_RANINAGAR_3": "Independent_63_RANINAGAR_3", "Independent_64_MURSHIDABAD_1": "Independent_64_MURSHIDABAD_1", "Independent_64_MURSHIDABAD_2": "Independent_64_MURSHIDABAD_2", "Independent_64_MURSHIDABAD_3": "Independent_64_MURSHIDABAD_3", "Independent_64_MURSHIDABAD_4": "Independent_64_MURSHIDABAD_4", "Democratic_Socialist_Party_of_India": "Democratic_Socialist_Party_of_India", "Independent_67_BURWAN_1": "Independent_67_BURWAN_1", "Independent_68_KANDI_1": "Independent_68_KANDI_1", "Independent_68_KANDI_2": "Independent_68_KANDI_2", "Justice_and_Development_Party": "Justice_and_Development_Party", "Independent_68_KANDI_3": "Independent_68_KANDI_3", "Independent_69_BHARATPUR_1": "Independent_69_BHARATPUR_1", "HAM": "HAM", "Independent_71_BELDANGA_1": "Independent_71_BELDANGA_1", "Independent_71_BELDANGA_2": "Independent_71_BELDANGA_2", "Independent_72_BAHARAMPUR_1": "Independent_72_BAHARAMPUR_1", "Independent_73_HARIHARPARA_1": "Independent_73_HARIHARPARA_1", "Independent_73_HARIHARPARA_2": "Independent_73_HARIHARPARA_2", "Independent_73_HARIHARPARA_3": "Independent_73_HARIHARPARA_3", "Independent_73_HARIHARPARA_4": "Independent_73_HARIHARPARA_4", "Independent_73_HARIHARPARA_5": "Independent_73_HARIHARPARA_5", "Independent_73_HARIHARPARA_6": "Independent_73_HARIHARPARA_6", "Independent_73_HARIHARPARA_7": "Independent_73_HARIHARPARA_7", "Independent_74_NAODA_1": "Independent_74_NAODA_1", "Independent_74_NAODA_2": "Independent_74_NAODA_2", "Independent_74_NAODA_3": "Independent_74_NAODA_3", "Independent_74_NAODA_4": "Independent_74_NAODA_4", "Independent_75_DOMKAL_1": "Independent_75_DOMKAL_1", "Independent_75_DOMKAL_2": "Independent_75_DOMKAL_2", "Independent_75_DOMKAL_3": "Independent_75_DOMKAL_3", "Independent_76_JALANGI_1": "Independent_76_JALANGI_1", "Independent_76_JALANGI_2": "Independent_76_JALANGI_2", "Independent_77_KARIMPUR_1": "Independent_77_KARIMPUR_1", "Independent_77_KARIMPUR_2": "Independent_77_KARIMPUR_2", "Independent_78_TEHATTA_1": "Independent_78_TEHATTA_1", "Purvanchal_Mahapanchayat": "Purvanchal_Mahapanchayat", "Independent_78_TEHATTA_2": "Independent_78_TEHATTA_2", "Independent_79_PALASHIPARA_1": "Independent_79_PALASHIPARA_1", "Independent_79_PALASHIPARA_2": "Independent_79_PALASHIPARA_2", "Independent_79_PALASHIPARA_3": "Independent_79_PALASHIPARA_3", "Independent_80_KALIGANJ_1": "Independent_80_KALIGANJ_1", "Bharatiya_Nyay_Adhikar_Raksha_Party": "Bharatiya_Nyay_Adhikar_Raksha_Party", "Independent_80_KALIGANJ_2": "Independent_80_KALIGANJ_2", "Independent_81_NAKASHIPARA_1": "Independent_81_NAKASHIPARA_1", "Independent_82_CHAPRA_1": "Independent_82_CHAPRA_1", "Independent_83_KRISHNANAGAR_UTTAR_1": "Independent_83_KRISHNANAGAR_UTTAR_1", "Independent_84_NABADWIP_1": "Independent_84_NABADWIP_1", "Independent_85_KRISHNANAGAR_DAKSHIN_1": "Independent_85_KRISHNANAGAR_DAKSHIN_1", "Independent_85_KRISHNANAGAR_DAKSHIN_2": "Independent_85_KRISHNANAGAR_DAKSHIN_2", "Jan_Sangh_Party": "Jan_Sangh_Party", "Independent_87_RANAGHAT_UTTAR_PASCHIM_1": "Independent_87_RANAGHAT_UTTAR_PASCHIM_1", "Independent_87_RANAGHAT_UTTAR_PASCHIM_2": "Independent_87_RANAGHAT_UTTAR_PASCHIM_2", "Independent_87_RANAGHAT_UTTAR_PASCHIM_3": "Independent_87_RANAGHAT_UTTAR_PASCHIM_3", "Socialist_Party_India": "Socialist_Party_India", "Independent_88_KRISHNAGANJ_1": "Independent_88_KRISHNAGANJ_1", "New_Democratic_Party_of_India": "New_Democratic_Party_of_India", "Independent_89_RANAGHAT_UTTAR_PURBA_1": "Independent_89_RANAGHAT_UTTAR_PURBA_1", "Independent_89_RANAGHAT_UTTAR_PURBA_2": "Independent_89_RANAGHAT_UTTAR_PURBA_2", "Independent_91_CHAKDAHA_1": "Independent_91_CHAKDAHA_1", "Independent_91_CHAKDAHA_2": "Independent_91_CHAKDAHA_2", "Independent_91_CHAKDAHA_3": "Independent_91_CHAKDAHA_3", "Independent_92_KALYANI_1": "Independent_92_KALYANI_1", "Independent_92_KALYANI_2": "Independent_92_KALYANI_2", "Independent_93_HARINGHATA_1": "Independent_93_HARINGHATA_1", "Independent_93_HARINGHATA_2": "Independent_93_HARINGHATA_2", "Independent_94_BAGDAH_1": "Independent_94_BAGDAH_1", "Independent_95_BONGAON_UTTAR_1": "Independent_95_BONGAON_UTTAR_1", "Independent_95_BONGAON_UTTAR_2": "Independent_95_BONGAON_UTTAR_2", "Independent_95_BONGAON_UTTAR_3": "Independent_95_BONGAON_UTTAR_3", "Independent_96_BONGAON_DAKSHIN_1": "Independent_96_BONGAON_DAKSHIN_1", "Independent_96_BONGAON_DAKSHIN_2": "Independent_96_BONGAON_DAKSHIN_2", "Independent_97_GAIGHATA_1": "Independent_97_GAIGHATA_1", "Independent_97_GAIGHATA_2": "Independent_97_GAIGHATA_2", "Independent_97_GAIGHATA_3": "Independent_97_GAIGHATA_3", "Independent_98_SWARUPNAGAR_1": "Independent_98_SWARUPNAGAR_1", "Independent_98_SWARUPNAGAR_2": "Independent_98_SWARUPNAGAR_2", "Independent_99_BADURIA_1": "Independent_99_BADURIA_1", "Independent_100_HABRA_1": "Independent_100_HABRA_1", "Independent_101_ASHOKNAGAR_1": "Independent_101_ASHOKNAGAR_1", "Guru_Chand_Mukti_Morcha": "Guru_Chand_Mukti_Morcha", "Independent_101_ASHOKNAGAR_2": "Independent_101_ASHOKNAGAR_2", "Independent_102_AMDANGA_1": "Independent_102_AMDANGA_1", "Independent_102_AMDANGA_2": "Independent_102_AMDANGA_2", "Independent_103_BIJPUR_1": "Independent_103_BIJPUR_1", "Independent_103_BIJPUR_2": "Independent_103_BIJPUR_2", "Independent_104_NAIHATI_1": "Independent_104_NAIHATI_1", "Independent_105_BHATPARA_1": "Independent_105_BHATPARA_1", "Independent_105_BHATPARA_2": "Independent_105_BHATPARA_2", "Independent_105_BHATPARA_3": "Independent_105_BHATPARA_3", "Independent_105_BHATPARA_4": "Independent_105_BHATPARA_4", "Independent_106_JAGATDAL_1": "Independent_106_JAGATDAL_1", "Independent_106_JAGATDAL_2": "Independent_106_JAGATDAL_2", "Independent_106_JAGATDAL_3": "Independent_106_JAGATDAL_3", "Independent_106_JAGATDAL_4": "Independent_106_JAGATDAL_4", "Independent_106_JAGATDAL_5": "Independent_106_JAGATDAL_5", "Independent_106_JAGATDAL_6": "Independent_106_JAGATDAL_6", "Revolutionary_Socialist_Party_of_India_Marxist": "Revolutionary_Socialist_Party_of_India_Marxist", "Independent_107_NOAPARA_1": "Independent_107_NOAPARA_1", "Independent_107_NOAPARA_2": "Independent_107_NOAPARA_2", "Independent_107_NOAPARA_3": "Independent_107_NOAPARA_3", "Independent_107_NOAPARA_4": "Independent_107_NOAPARA_4", "Independent_107_NOAPARA_5": "Independent_107_NOAPARA_5", "Independent_108_BARRACKPUR_1": "Independent_108_BARRACKPUR_1", "Independent_109_KHARDAHA_1": "Independent_109_KHARDAHA_1", "Independent_109_KHARDAHA_2": "Independent_109_KHARDAHA_2", "Independent_111_PANIHATI_1": "Independent_111_PANIHATI_1", "Independent_112_KAMARHATI_1": "Independent_112_KAMARHATI_1", "Independent_112_KAMARHATI_2": "Independent_112_KAMARHATI_2", "Independent_112_KAMARHATI_3": "Independent_112_KAMARHATI_3", "Independent_112_KAMARHATI_4": "Independent_112_KAMARHATI_4", "Independent_113_BARANAGAR_1": "Independent_113_BARANAGAR_1", "National_Republic_Party_Of_India": "National_Republic_Party_Of_India", "Independent_113_BARANAGAR_2": "Independent_113_BARANAGAR_2", "Independent_114_DUM_DUM_1": "Independent_114_DUM_DUM_1", "Independent_114_DUM_DUM_2": "Independent_114_DUM_DUM_2", "Independent_114_DUM_DUM_3": "Independent_114_DUM_DUM_3", "Independent_115_RAJARHAT_NEW_TOWN_1": "Independent_115_RAJARHAT_NEW_TOWN_1", "Independent_115_RAJARHAT_NEW_TOWN_2": "Independent_115_RAJARHAT_NEW_TOWN_2", "Independent_116_BIDHANNAGAR_1": "Independent_116_BIDHANNAGAR_1", "Independent_116_BIDHANNAGAR_2": "Independent_116_BIDHANNAGAR_2", "Independent_116_BIDHANNAGAR_3": "Independent_116_BIDHANNAGAR_3", "Independent_116_BIDHANNAGAR_4": "Independent_116_BIDHANNAGAR_4", "Independent_116_BIDHANNAGAR_5": "Independent_116_BIDHANNAGAR_5", "Independent_117_RAJARHAT_GOPALPUR_1": "Independent_117_RAJARHAT_GOPALPUR_1", "Independent_117_RAJARHAT_GOPALPUR_2": "Independent_117_RAJARHAT_GOPALPUR_2", "Independent_117_RAJARHAT_GOPALPUR_3": "Independent_117_RAJARHAT_GOPALPUR_3", "Independent_117_RAJARHAT_GOPALPUR_4": "Independent_117_RAJARHAT_GOPALPUR_4", "Independent_117_RAJARHAT_GOPALPUR_5": "Independent_117_RAJARHAT_GOPALPUR_5", "Independent_117_RAJARHAT_GOPALPUR_6": "Independent_117_RAJARHAT_GOPALPUR_6", "Independent_117_RAJARHAT_GOPALPUR_7": "Independent_117_RAJARHAT_GOPALPUR_7", "Independent_118_MADHYAMGRAM_1": "Independent_118_MADHYAMGRAM_1", "Independent_119_BARASAT_1": "Independent_119_BARASAT_1", "Independent_119_BARASAT_2": "Independent_119_BARASAT_2", "Independent_121_HAROA_1": "Independent_121_HAROA_1", "Independent_123_SANDESHKHALI_1": "Independent_123_SANDESHKHALI_1", "Independent_123_SANDESHKHALI_2": "Independent_123_SANDESHKHALI_2", "Independent_123_SANDESHKHALI_3": "Independent_123_SANDESHKHALI_3", "Independent_125_BASIRHAT_UTTAR_1": "Independent_125_BASIRHAT_UTTAR_1", "Independent_125_BASIRHAT_UTTAR_2": "Independent_125_BASIRHAT_UTTAR_2", "Independent_126_HINGALGANJ_1": "Independent_126_HINGALGANJ_1", "Independent_128_BASANTI_1": "Independent_128_BASANTI_1", "Independent_128_BASANTI_2": "Independent_128_BASANTI_2", "Independent_129_KULTALI_1": "Independent_129_KULTALI_1", "Independent_129_KULTALI_2": "Independent_129_KULTALI_2", "Lok_Samya_Party": "Lok_Samya_Party", "Independent_133_KULPI_1": "Independent_133_KULPI_1", "Independent_134_RAIDIGHI_1": "Independent_134_RAIDIGHI_1", "Independent_134_RAIDIGHI_2": "Independent_134_RAIDIGHI_2", "Independent_135_MANDIRBAZAR_1": "Independent_135_MANDIRBAZAR_1", "Independent_135_MANDIRBAZAR_2": "Independent_135_MANDIRBAZAR_2", "Independent_135_MANDIRBAZAR_3": "Independent_135_MANDIRBAZAR_3", "Independent_136_JAQYNAGAR_1": "Independent_136_JAQYNAGAR_1", "Independent_137_BARUIPUR_PURBA_1": "Independent_137_BARUIPUR_PURBA_1", "Independent_137_BARUIPUR_PURBA_2": "Independent_137_BARUIPUR_PURBA_2", "Independent_138_CANNING_PASCHIM_1": "Independent_138_CANNING_PASCHIM_1", "Independent_138_CANNING_PASCHIM_2": "Independent_138_CANNING_PASCHIM_2", "Independent_138_CANNING_PASCHIM_3": "Independent_138_CANNING_PASCHIM_3", "Independent_139_CANNING_PURBA_1": "Independent_139_CANNING_PURBA_1", "Independent_140_BARUIPUR_PASCHIM_1": "Independent_140_BARUIPUR_PASCHIM_1", "Independent_140_BARUIPUR_PASCHIM_2": "Independent_140_BARUIPUR_PASCHIM_2", "Independent_140_BARUIPUR_PASCHIM_3": "Independent_140_BARUIPUR_PASCHIM_3", "Independent_140_BARUIPUR_PASCHIM_4": "Independent_140_BARUIPUR_PASCHIM_4", "Independent_141_MAGRAHAT_PURBA_1": "Independent_141_MAGRAHAT_PURBA_1", "Independent_141_MAGRAHAT_PURBA_2": "Independent_141_MAGRAHAT_PURBA_2", "Independent_141_MAGRAHAT_PURBA_3": "Independent_141_MAGRAHAT_PURBA_3", "Independent_142_MAGRAHAT_PASCHIM_1": "Independent_142_MAGRAHAT_PASCHIM_1", "Independent_142_MAGRAHAT_PASCHIM_2": "Independent_142_MAGRAHAT_PASCHIM_2", "Independent_142_MAGRAHAT_PASCHIM_3": "Independent_142_MAGRAHAT_PASCHIM_3", "Independent_142_MAGRAHAT_PASCHIM_4": "Independent_142_MAGRAHAT_PASCHIM_4", "Independent_142_MAGRAHAT_PASCHIM_5": "Independent_142_MAGRAHAT_PASCHIM_5", "Independent_143_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_1": "Independent_143_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_1", "Independent_143_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_2": "Independent_143_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_2", "Independent_143_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_3": "Independent_143_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_3", "Independent_143_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_4": "Independent_143_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_4", "Independent_143_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_5": "Independent_143_DIAMOND_HARBOUR_5", "Independent_144_FALTA_1": "Independent_144_FALTA_1", "Independent_144_FALTA_2": "Independent_144_FALTA_2", "Independent_144_FALTA_3": "Independent_144_FALTA_3", "Independent_144_FALTA_4": "Independent_144_FALTA_4", "Independent_144_FALTA_5": "Independent_144_FALTA_5", "Independent_144_FALTA_6": "Independent_144_FALTA_6", "Independent_145_SATGACHIA_1": "Independent_145_SATGACHIA_1", "Independent_146_BISHNUPUR_SC_1": "Independent_146_BISHNUPUR_SC_1", "Independent_147_SONARPUR_DAKSHIN_1": "Independent_147_SONARPUR_DAKSHIN_1", "Independent_147_SONARPUR_DAKSHIN_2": "Independent_147_SONARPUR_DAKSHIN_2", "Independent_147_SONARPUR_DAKSHIN_3": "Independent_147_SONARPUR_DAKSHIN_3", "Independent_147_SONARPUR_DAKSHIN_4": "Independent_147_SONARPUR_DAKSHIN_4", "Right_to_Recall_Party": "Right_to_Recall_Party", "Independent_147_SONARPUR_DAKSHIN_5": "Independent_147_SONARPUR_DAKSHIN_5", "Independent_147_SONARPUR_DAKSHIN_6": "Independent_147_SONARPUR_DAKSHIN_6", "Independent_148_BHANGORE_1": "Independent_148_BHANGORE_1", "Independent_148_BHANGORE_2": "Independent_148_BHANGORE_2", "Independent_149_KASBA_1": "Independent_149_KASBA_1", "Independent_149_KASBA_2": "Independent_149_KASBA_2", "Independent_149_KASBA_3": "Independent_149_KASBA_3", "Independent_149_KASBA_4": "Independent_149_KASBA_4", "Independent_149_KASBA_5": "Independent_149_KASBA_5", "Independent_150_JADAVPUR_1": "Independent_150_JADAVPUR_1", "Independent_150_JADAVPUR_2": "Independent_150_JADAVPUR_2", "Independent_150_JADAVPUR_3": "Independent_150_JADAVPUR_3", "Independent_150_JADAVPUR_4": "Independent_150_JADAVPUR_4", "Independent_150_JADAVPUR_5": "Independent_150_JADAVPUR_5", "Independent_150_JADAVPUR_6": "Independent_150_JADAVPUR_6", "Independent_151_SONARPUR_UTTAR_1": "Independent_151_SONARPUR_UTTAR_1", "Independent_151_SONARPUR_UTTAR_2": "Independent_151_SONARPUR_UTTAR_2", "Independent_151_SONARPUR_UTTAR_3": "Independent_151_SONARPUR_UTTAR_3", "Independent_151_SONARPUR_UTTAR_4": "Independent_151_SONARPUR_UTTAR_4", "Independent_152_TOLLYGUNJ_1": "Independent_152_TOLLYGUNJ_1", "Independent_152_TOLLYGUNJ_2": "Independent_152_TOLLYGUNJ_2", "Independent_152_TOLLYGUNJ_3": "Independent_152_TOLLYGUNJ_3", "Independent_152_TOLLYGUNJ_4": "Independent_152_TOLLYGUNJ_4", "Independent_152_TOLLYGUNJ_5": "Independent_152_TOLLYGUNJ_5", "Independent_152_TOLLYGUNJ_6": "Independent_152_TOLLYGUNJ_6", "Independent_152_TOLLYGUNJ_7": "Independent_152_TOLLYGUNJ_7", "Independent_152_TOLLYGUNJ_8": "Independent_152_TOLLYGUNJ_8", "Independent_153_BEHALA_PURBA_1": "Independent_153_BEHALA_PURBA_1", "Independent_153_BEHALA_PURBA_2": "Independent_153_BEHALA_PURBA_2", "Independent_153_BEHALA_PURBA_3": "Independent_153_BEHALA_PURBA_3", "Independent_153_BEHALA_PURBA_4": "Independent_153_BEHALA_PURBA_4", "Independent_153_BEHALA_PURBA_5": "Independent_153_BEHALA_PURBA_5", "Independent_153_BEHALA_PURBA_6": "Independent_153_BEHALA_PURBA_6", "Independent_154_BEHALA_PASCHIM_1": "Independent_154_BEHALA_PASCHIM_1", "Independent_154_BEHALA_PASCHIM_2": "Independent_154_BEHALA_PASCHIM_2", "Independent_154_BEHALA_PASCHIM_3": "Independent_154_BEHALA_PASCHIM_3", "Independent_154_BEHALA_PASCHIM_4": "Independent_154_BEHALA_PASCHIM_4", "Independent_155_MAHESHTALA_1": "Independent_155_MAHESHTALA_1", "Independent_155_MAHESHTALA_2": "Independent_155_MAHESHTALA_2", "Independent_156_BUDGE_BUDGE_1": "Independent_156_BUDGE_BUDGE_1", "Independent_156_BUDGE_BUDGE_2": "Independent_156_BUDGE_BUDGE_2", "Independent_156_BUDGE_BUDGE_3": "Independent_156_BUDGE_BUDGE_3", "Independent_157_METIABURUZ_1": "Independent_157_METIABURUZ_1", "Independent_157_METIABURUZ_2": "Independent_157_METIABURUZ_2", "All_India_Minorities_Front": "All_India_Minorities_Front", "Independent_157_METIABURUZ_3": "Independent_157_METIABURUZ_3", "Independent_158_KOLKATA_PORT_1": "Independent_158_KOLKATA_PORT_1", "Independent_158_KOLKATA_PORT_2": "Independent_158_KOLKATA_PORT_2", "Independent_158_KOLKATA_PORT_3": "Independent_158_KOLKATA_PORT_3", "Independent_158_KOLKATA_PORT_4": "Independent_158_KOLKATA_PORT_4", "Independent_159_BHABANIPUR_1": "Independent_159_BHABANIPUR_1", "Independent_159_BHABANIPUR_2": "Independent_159_BHABANIPUR_2", "Independent_159_BHABANIPUR_3": "Independent_159_BHABANIPUR_3", "Independent_159_BHABANIPUR_4": "Independent_159_BHABANIPUR_4", "Independent_159_BHABANIPUR_5": "Independent_159_BHABANIPUR_5", "Independent_160_RASHBEHARI_1": "Independent_160_RASHBEHARI_1", "Independent_160_RASHBEHARI_2": "Independent_160_RASHBEHARI_2", "Independent_160_RASHBEHARI_3": "Independent_160_RASHBEHARI_3", "Independent_160_RASHBEHARI_4": "Independent_160_RASHBEHARI_4", "Independent_160_RASHBEHARI_5": "Independent_160_RASHBEHARI_5", "Independent_160_RASHBEHARI_6": "Independent_160_RASHBEHARI_6", "Independent_161_BALLYGUNGE_1": "Independent_161_BALLYGUNGE_1", "Independent_161_BALLYGUNGE_2": "Independent_161_BALLYGUNGE_2", "Independent_161_BALLYGUNGE_3": "Independent_161_BALLYGUNGE_3", "Independent_161_BALLYGUNGE_4": "Independent_161_BALLYGUNGE_4", "Independent_162_CHOWRANGEE_1": "Independent_162_CHOWRANGEE_1", "Independent_162_CHOWRANGEE_2": "Independent_162_CHOWRANGEE_2", "Independent_162_CHOWRANGEE_3": "Independent_162_CHOWRANGEE_3", "Independent_162_CHOWRANGEE_4": "Independent_162_CHOWRANGEE_4", "Bharatiya_Momin_Front": "Bharatiya_Momin_Front", "Independent_163_ENTALLY_1": "Independent_163_ENTALLY_1", "West_Bengal_Socialist_Party": "West_Bengal_Socialist_Party", "Independent_163_ENTALLY_2": "Independent_163_ENTALLY_2", "Independent_163_ENTALLY_3": "Independent_163_ENTALLY_3", "Independent_163_ENTALLY_4": "Independent_163_ENTALLY_4", "Independent_163_ENTALLY_5": "Independent_163_ENTALLY_5", "Independent_163_ENTALLY_6": "Independent_163_ENTALLY_6", "Independent_163_ENTALLY_7": "Independent_163_ENTALLY_7", "Independent_164_BELEGHATA_1": "Independent_164_BELEGHATA_1", "Independent_164_BELEGHATA_2": "Independent_164_BELEGHATA_2", "Independent_164_BELEGHATA_3": "Independent_164_BELEGHATA_3", "Akhil_Bharat_Hindu_Mahasabha": "Akhil_Bharat_Hindu_Mahasabha", "Independent_164_BELEGHATA_4": "Independent_164_BELEGHATA_4", "Independent_164_BELEGHATA_5": "Independent_164_BELEGHATA_5", "Independent_164_BELEGHATA_6": "Independent_164_BELEGHATA_6", "Independent_164_BELEGHATA_7": "Independent_164_BELEGHATA_7", "Independent_165_JORASANKO_1": "Independent_165_JORASANKO_1", "Independent_165_JORASANKO_2": "Independent_165_JORASANKO_2", "Independent_165_JORASANKO_3": "Independent_165_JORASANKO_3", "Independent_165_JORASANKO_4": "Independent_165_JORASANKO_4", "Independent_165_JORASANKO_5": "Independent_165_JORASANKO_5", "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_1": "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_1", "Sajag_Samaj_Party": "Sajag_Samaj_Party", "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_2": "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_2", "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_3": "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_3", "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_4": "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_4", "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_5": "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_5", "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_6": "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_6", "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_7": "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_7", "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_8": "Independent_166_SHYAMPUKUR_8", "Independent_167_MANIKTALA_1": "Independent_167_MANIKTALA_1", "Independent_167_MANIKTALA_2": "Independent_167_MANIKTALA_2", "Independent_167_MANIKTALA_3": "Independent_167_MANIKTALA_3", "Independent_167_MANIKTALA_4": "Independent_167_MANIKTALA_4", "Independent_167_MANIKTALA_5": "Independent_167_MANIKTALA_5", "Independent_168_KASHIPUR_BELGACHIA_1": "Independent_168_KASHIPUR_BELGACHIA_1", "Independent_168_KASHIPUR_BELGACHIA_2": "Independent_168_KASHIPUR_BELGACHIA_2", "Independent_168_KASHIPUR_BELGACHIA_3": "Independent_168_KASHIPUR_BELGACHIA_3", "Independent_168_KASHIPUR_BELGACHIA_4": "Independent_168_KASHIPUR_BELGACHIA_4", "Independent_168_KASHIPUR_BELGACHIA_5": "Independent_168_KASHIPUR_BELGACHIA_5", "Independent_169_BALLY_1": "Independent_169_BALLY_1", "Independent_169_BALLY_2": "Independent_169_BALLY_2", "Independent_169_BALLY_3": "Independent_169_BALLY_3", "Independent_169_BALLY_4": "Independent_169_BALLY_4", "Independent_169_BALLY_5": "Independent_169_BALLY_5", "Independent_169_BALLY_6": "Independent_169_BALLY_6", "Independent_169_BALLY_7": "Independent_169_BALLY_7", "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_1": "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_1", "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_2": "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_2", "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_3": "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_3", "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_4": "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_4", "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_5": "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_5", "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_6": "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_6", "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_7": "Independent_170_HOWRAH_UTTAR_7", "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_1": "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_1", "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_2": "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_2", "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_3": "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_3", "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_4": "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_4", "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_5": "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_5", "Vikas_India_Party": "Vikas_India_Party", "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_6": "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_6", "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_7": "Independent_171_HOWRAH_MADHYA_7", "Independent_172_SHIBPUR_1": "Independent_172_SHIBPUR_1", "Independent_172_SHIBPUR_2": "Independent_172_SHIBPUR_2", "Independent_172_SHIBPUR_3": "Independent_172_SHIBPUR_3", "Independent_172_SHIBPUR_4": "Independent_172_SHIBPUR_4", "Independent_172_SHIBPUR_5": "Independent_172_SHIBPUR_5", "Independent_172_SHIBPUR_6": "Independent_172_SHIBPUR_6", "Independent_173_HOWRAH_DAKSHIN_1": "Independent_173_HOWRAH_DAKSHIN_1", "Independent_173_HOWRAH_DAKSHIN_2": "Independent_173_HOWRAH_DAKSHIN_2", "Independent_173_HOWRAH_DAKSHIN_3": "Independent_173_HOWRAH_DAKSHIN_3", "Independent_173_HOWRAH_DAKSHIN_4": "Independent_173_HOWRAH_DAKSHIN_4", "Independent_173_HOWRAH_DAKSHIN_5": "Independent_173_HOWRAH_DAKSHIN_5", "Independent_173_HOWRAH_DAKSHIN_6": "Independent_173_HOWRAH_DAKSHIN_6", "Independent_173_HOWRAH_DAKSHIN_7": "Independent_173_HOWRAH_DAKSHIN_7", "Independent_174_SANKRAIL_1": "Independent_174_SANKRAIL_1", "Independent_174_SANKRAIL_2": "Independent_174_SANKRAIL_2", "Independent_174_SANKRAIL_3": "Independent_174_SANKRAIL_3", "Independent_174_SANKRAIL_4": "Independent_174_SANKRAIL_4", "Independent_174_SANKRAIL_5": "Independent_174_SANKRAIL_5", "Independent_175_PANCHLA_1": "Independent_175_PANCHLA_1", "Independent_176_ULUBERIA_PURBA_1": "Independent_176_ULUBERIA_PURBA_1", "Indian_Unity_Centre": "Indian_Unity_Centre", "Independent_176_ULUBERIA_PURBA_2": "Independent_176_ULUBERIA_PURBA_2", "Independent_176_ULUBERIA_PURBA_3": "Independent_176_ULUBERIA_PURBA_3", "Independent_177_ULUBERIA_UTTAR_1": "Independent_177_ULUBERIA_UTTAR_1", "Independent_177_ULUBERIA_UTTAR_2": "Independent_177_ULUBERIA_UTTAR_2", "Independent_177_ULUBERIA_UTTAR_3": "Independent_177_ULUBERIA_UTTAR_3", "Independent_177_ULUBERIA_UTTAR_4": "Independent_177_ULUBERIA_UTTAR_4", "Independent_178_ULUBERIA_DAKSHIN_1": "Independent_178_ULUBERIA_DAKSHIN_1", "Independent_178_ULUBERIA_DAKSHIN_2": "Independent_178_ULUBERIA_DAKSHIN_2", "Independent_179_SHYAMPUR_1": "Independent_179_SHYAMPUR_1", "Independent_179_SHYAMPUR_2": "Independent_179_SHYAMPUR_2", "Independent_180_BAGNAN_1": "Independent_180_BAGNAN_1", "Independent_180_BAGNAN_2": "Independent_180_BAGNAN_2", "Independent_180_BAGNAN_3": "Independent_180_BAGNAN_3", "Independent_181_AMTA_1": "Independent_181_AMTA_1", "Independent_181_AMTA_2": "Independent_181_AMTA_2", "Independent_181_AMTA_3": "Independent_181_AMTA_3", "Independent_182_UDAYNARAYANPUR_1": "Independent_182_UDAYNARAYANPUR_1", "Independent_182_UDAYNARAYANPUR_2": "Independent_182_UDAYNARAYANPUR_2", "Independent_183_JAGATBALLAVPUR_1": "Independent_183_JAGATBALLAVPUR_1", "Independent_184_DOMJUR_1": "Independent_184_DOMJUR_1", "Independent_184_DOMJUR_2": "Independent_184_DOMJUR_2", "Independent_184_DOMJUR_3": "Independent_184_DOMJUR_3", "Independent_184_DOMJUR_4": "Independent_184_DOMJUR_4", "Independent_184_DOMJUR_5": "Independent_184_DOMJUR_5", "Independent_184_DOMJUR_6": "Independent_184_DOMJUR_6", "Independent_184_DOMJUR_7": "Independent_184_DOMJUR_7", "Independent_184_DOMJUR_8": "Independent_184_DOMJUR_8", "Independent_184_DOMJUR_9": "Independent_184_DOMJUR_9", "Independent_184_DOMJUR_10": "Independent_184_DOMJUR_10", "Independent_185_UTTARPARA_1": "Independent_185_UTTARPARA_1", "Independent_186_SREERAMPUR_1": "Independent_186_SREERAMPUR_1", "Independent_186_SREERAMPUR_2": "Independent_186_SREERAMPUR_2", "Independent_187_CHAMPDANI_1": "Independent_187_CHAMPDANI_1", "Independent_187_CHAMPDANI_2": "Independent_187_CHAMPDANI_2", "Independent_187_CHAMPDANI_3": "Independent_187_CHAMPDANI_3", "Independent_189_CHANDANNAGORE_1": "Independent_189_CHANDANNAGORE_1", "Independent_189_CHANDANNAGORE_2": "Independent_189_CHANDANNAGORE_2", "Independent_189_CHANDANNAGORE_3": "Independent_189_CHANDANNAGORE_3", "Independent_189_CHANDANNAGORE_4": "Independent_189_CHANDANNAGORE_4", "Independent_189_CHANDANNAGORE_5": "Independent_189_CHANDANNAGORE_5", "Independent_190_CHUNCHURA_1": "Independent_190_CHUNCHURA_1", "Independent_190_CHUNCHURA_2": "Independent_190_CHUNCHURA_2", "Independent_190_CHUNCHURA_3": "Independent_190_CHUNCHURA_3", "Independent_193_SAPTAGRAM_1": "Independent_193_SAPTAGRAM_1", "Independent_193_SAPTAGRAM_2": "Independent_193_SAPTAGRAM_2", "Independent_193_SAPTAGRAM_3": "Independent_193_SAPTAGRAM_3", "Independent_193_SAPTAGRAM_4": "Independent_193_SAPTAGRAM_4", "Independent_193_SAPTAGRAM_5": "Independent_193_SAPTAGRAM_5", "Independent_194_CHANDITALA_1": "Independent_194_CHANDITALA_1", "Independent_194_CHANDITALA_2": "Independent_194_CHANDITALA_2", "Independent_195_JANGIPARA_1": "Independent_195_JANGIPARA_1", "Independent_195_JANGIPARA_2": "Independent_195_JANGIPARA_2", "Independent_195_JANGIPARA_3": "Independent_195_JANGIPARA_3", "Independent_195_JANGIPARA_4": "Independent_195_JANGIPARA_4", "Independent_198_TARAKESWAR_1": "Independent_198_TARAKESWAR_1", "Independent_199_PURSURAH_1": "Independent_199_PURSURAH_1", "Independent_202_KHANAKUL_1": "Independent_202_KHANAKUL_1", "Independent_202_KHANAKUL_2": "Independent_202_KHANAKUL_2", "Independent_202_KHANAKUL_3": "Independent_202_KHANAKUL_3", "Independent_203_TAMLUK_1": "Independent_203_TAMLUK_1", "Independent_203_TAMLUK_2": "Independent_203_TAMLUK_2", "Independent_204_PANSKURA_PURBA_1": "Independent_204_PANSKURA_PURBA_1", "Independent_205_PANSKURA_PASCHIM_1": "Independent_205_PANSKURA_PASCHIM_1", "Independent_206_MOYNA_1": "Independent_206_MOYNA_1", "Independent_206_MOYNA_2": "Independent_206_MOYNA_2", "Independent_207_NANDAKUMAR_1": "Independent_207_NANDAKUMAR_1", "Independent_208_MAHISADAL_1": "Independent_208_MAHISADAL_1", "Independent_208_MAHISADAL_2": "Independent_208_MAHISADAL_2", "Independent_210_NANDIGRAM_1": "Independent_210_NANDIGRAM_1", "Independent_210_NANDIGRAM_2": "Independent_210_NANDIGRAM_2", "Independent_210_NANDIGRAM_3": "Independent_210_NANDIGRAM_3", "Independent_210_NANDIGRAM_4": "Independent_210_NANDIGRAM_4", "Independent_211_CHANDIPUR_1": "Independent_211_CHANDIPUR_1", "Independent_213_KANTHI_UTTAR_1": "Independent_213_KANTHI_UTTAR_1", "Independent_213_KANTHI_UTTAR_2": "Independent_213_KANTHI_UTTAR_2", "Independent_213_KANTHI_UTTAR_3": "Independent_213_KANTHI_UTTAR_3", "Independent_220_NAYAGRAM_1": "Independent_220_NAYAGRAM_1", "Independent_220_NAYAGRAM_2": "Independent_220_NAYAGRAM_2", "Independent_221_GOPIBALLAVPUR_1": "Independent_221_GOPIBALLAVPUR_1", "Independent_221_GOPIBALLAVPUR_2": "Independent_221_GOPIBALLAVPUR_2", "Independent_221_GOPIBALLAVPUR_3": "Independent_221_GOPIBALLAVPUR_3", "Independent_221_GOPIBALLAVPUR_4": "Independent_221_GOPIBALLAVPUR_4", "Independent_221_GOPIBALLAVPUR_5": "Independent_221_GOPIBALLAVPUR_5", "Independent_222_JHARGRAM_1": "Independent_222_JHARGRAM_1", "Independent_222_JHARGRAM_2": "Independent_222_JHARGRAM_2", "Independent_222_JHARGRAM_3": "Independent_222_JHARGRAM_3", "Independent_222_JHARGRAM_4": "Independent_222_JHARGRAM_4", "Humanity_Universal_Motion_Party": "Humanity_Universal_Motion_Party", "Independent_225_NARAYANGARH_1": "Independent_225_NARAYANGARH_1", "Independent_229_DEBRA_1": "Independent_229_DEBRA_1", "Independent_231_GHATAL_1": "Independent_231_GHATAL_1", "Independent_232_CHANDRAKONA_1": "Independent_232_CHANDRAKONA_1", "Independent_233_GARBETA_1": "Independent_233_GARBETA_1", "Independent_234_SALBONI_1": "Independent_234_SALBONI_1", "Independent_234_SALBONI_2": "Independent_234_SALBONI_2", "Independent_234_SALBONI_3": "Independent_234_SALBONI_3", "Independent_236_MEDINIPUR_1": "Independent_236_MEDINIPUR_1", "Independent_237_BINPUR_1": "Independent_237_BINPUR_1", "Independent_237_BINPUR_2": "Independent_237_BINPUR_2", "Independent_237_BINPUR_3": "Independent_237_BINPUR_3", "Independent_238_BANDWAN_1": "Independent_238_BANDWAN_1", "Independent_239_BALARAMPUR_1": "Independent_239_BALARAMPUR_1", "Bharateeya_Manavadhikar_party": "Bharateeya_Manavadhikar_party", "AJSUP": "AJSUP", "Independent_241_JOYPUR_1": "Independent_241_JOYPUR_1", "Mulnibasi_Party_of_India": "Mulnibasi_Party_of_India", "Independent_241_JOYPUR_2": "Independent_241_JOYPUR_2", "Independent_241_JOYPUR_3": "Independent_241_JOYPUR_3", "Independent_241_JOYPUR_4": "Independent_241_JOYPUR_4", "Independent_242_PURULIA_1": "Independent_242_PURULIA_1", "Independent_242_PURULIA_2": "Independent_242_PURULIA_2", "Independent_242_PURULIA_3": "Independent_242_PURULIA_3", "Independent_242_PURULIA_4": "Independent_242_PURULIA_4", "Independent_243_MANBAZAR_1": "Independent_243_MANBAZAR_1", "Independent_245_PARA_1": "Independent_245_PARA_1", "Independent_245_PARA_2": "Independent_245_PARA_2", "Independent_246_RAGHUNATHPUR_1": "Independent_246_RAGHUNATHPUR_1", "Independent_246_RAGHUNATHPUR_2": "Independent_246_RAGHUNATHPUR_2", "Independent_248_CHHATNA_1": "Independent_248_CHHATNA_1", "Independent_248_CHHATNA_2": "Independent_248_CHHATNA_2", "Independent_248_CHHATNA_3": "Independent_248_CHHATNA_3", "Independent_248_CHHATNA_4": "Independent_248_CHHATNA_4", "Independent_249_RANIBUNDH_1": "Independent_249_RANIBUNDH_1", "Independent_250_RAIPUR_1": "Independent_250_RAIPUR_1", "Independent_251_TALDANGRA_1": "Independent_251_TALDANGRA_1", "Independent_251_TALDANGRA_2": "Independent_251_TALDANGRA_2", "Independent_251_TALDANGRA_3": "Independent_251_TALDANGRA_3", "Independent_252_BANKURA_1": "Independent_252_BANKURA_1", "Independent_252_BANKURA_2": "Independent_252_BANKURA_2", "Independent_252_BANKURA_3": "Independent_252_BANKURA_3", "Independent_252_BANKURA_4": "Independent_252_BANKURA_4", "Independent_252_BANKURA_5": "Independent_252_BANKURA_5", "Independent_253_BARJORA_1": "Independent_253_BARJORA_1", "Independent_253_BARJORA_2": "Independent_253_BARJORA_2", "Independent_254_ONDA_1": "Independent_254_ONDA_1", "Independent_254_ONDA_2": "Independent_254_ONDA_2", "Independent_255_BISHNUPUR_1": "Independent_255_BISHNUPUR_1", "Independent_258_SONAMUKHI_1": "Independent_258_SONAMUKHI_1", "Independent_260_BARDHAMAN_DAKSHIN_1": "Independent_260_BARDHAMAN_DAKSHIN_1", "Independent_265_MEMARI_1": "Independent_265_MEMARI_1", "Independent_267_BHATAR_1": "Independent_267_BHATAR_1", "Independent_267_BHATAR_2": "Independent_267_BHATAR_2", "Independent_267_BHATAR_3": "Independent_267_BHATAR_3", "Independent_269_PURBASTHALI_UTTAR_1": "Independent_269_PURBASTHALI_UTTAR_1", "Independent_275_PANDABESWAR_1": "Independent_275_PANDABESWAR_1", "Independent_275_PANDABESWAR_2": "Independent_275_PANDABESWAR_2", "Independent_276_DURGAPUR_PURBA_1": "Independent_276_DURGAPUR_PURBA_1", "Independent_276_DURGAPUR_PURBA_2": "Independent_276_DURGAPUR_PURBA_2", "Independent_277_DURGAPUR_PASCHIM_1": "Independent_277_DURGAPUR_PASCHIM_1", "Independent_277_DURGAPUR_PASCHIM_2": "Independent_277_DURGAPUR_PASCHIM_2", "Independent_277_DURGAPUR_PASCHIM_3": "Independent_277_DURGAPUR_PASCHIM_3", "Independent_281_ASANSOL_UTTAR_1": "Independent_281_ASANSOL_UTTAR_1", "Independent_281_ASANSOL_UTTAR_2": "Independent_281_ASANSOL_UTTAR_2", "Independent_282_KULTI_1": "Independent_282_KULTI_1", "Independent_283_BARBANI_1": "Independent_283_BARBANI_1", "Independent_285_SURI_1": "Independent_285_SURI_1", "Paradise_Party": "Paradise_Party", "Rashtravadi_Janata_Party": "Rashtravadi_Janata_Party", "Independent_288_LABHPUR_1": "Independent_288_LABHPUR_1", "Independent_293_NALHATI_1": "Independent_293_NALHATI_1", "Independent_293_NALHATI_2": "Independent_293_NALHATI_2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 294, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 294, "registered_not_positive": 294}, "n_stations_flagged": 294, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:30:29.756181", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.398, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.307, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.398, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.398, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.307, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.307, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.234, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.234, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.687, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.466, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.466, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 294}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "43cfc3e2c02d4d498e7e89faeb726ed0", "name": "India 2020 local (overnight india_bihar_2020_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2020, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Bihar/Bihar_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AAAAP": "AAAAP", "AAM": "AAM", "ABMVMP": "ABMVMP", "ACDP": "ACDP", "AHFBK": "AHFBK", "AIFB": "AIFB", "AIMEIEM": "AIMEIEM", "AIMF": "AIMF", "AIMIM": "AIMIM", "AJPR": "AJPR", "AJPS": "AJPS", "AKBHAD": "AKBHAD", "AKBMP": "AKBMP", "AKHDBRYVP": "AKHDBRYVP", "AKNDBHRJNP": "AKNDBHRJNP", "AMJNMTP": "AMJNMTP", "AMiP": "AMiP", "ANC": "ANC", "APADP": "APADP", "APKSP": "APKSP", "APoI": "APoI", "ASDHP": "ASDHP", "ASPKR": "ASPKR", "AZSP": "AZSP", "AngSP": "AngSP", "BAHUMP": "BAHUMP", "BAJVP": "BAJVP", "BBC": "BBC", "BBMP": "BBMP", "BDlP": "BDlP", "BGMP": "BGMP", "BHAIP": "BHAIP", "BHJJP": "BHJJP", "BHRTLKCHTP": "BHRTLKCHTP", "BHRTSBLP": "BHRTSBLP", "BHRTSYTKP": "BHRTSYTKP", "BHULKD": "BHULKD", "BIP": "BIP", "BJJD": "BJJD", "BJKD": "BJKD", "BJKVP": "BJKVP", "BJNJGD": "BJNJGD", "BJNP": "BJNP", "BJP": "BJP", "BKKMP": "BKKMP", "BKVP": "BKVP", "BLND": "BLND", "BLRP": "BLRP", "BMF": "BMF", "BMUP": "BMUP", "BNDl": "BNDl", "BPL": "BPL", "BRCTP": "BRCTP", "BRMNP": "BRMNP", "BRRTD": "BRRTD", "BRTYLKNYKP": "BRTYLKNYKP", "BSP": "BSP", "BSSPA": "BSSPA", "BTMSP": "BTMSP", "BVDU": "BVDU", "BYPP": "BYPP", "BaSaPa": "BaSaPa", "BhAmAP": "BhAmAP", "BhNP": "BhNP", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "CPIM": "CPIM", "FJKSP": "FJKSP", "GGP": "GGP", "GJKP": "GJKP", "GJNP": "GJNP", "HAMS": "HAMS", "HNDUAWMMNC": "HNDUAWMMNC", "HSAP": "HSAP", "HSP": "HSP", "HVD": "HVD", "INC": "INC", "INL": "INL", "Independent_100_10": "Independent_100_10", "Independent_100_14": "Independent_100_14", "Independent_100_15": "Independent_100_15", "Independent_100_3": "Independent_100_3", "Independent_100_4": "Independent_100_4", "Independent_100_6": "Independent_100_6", "Independent_100_7": "Independent_100_7", "Independent_100_8": "Independent_100_8", "Independent_100_9": "Independent_100_9", "Independent_101_10": "Independent_101_10", "Independent_101_12": "Independent_101_12", "Independent_101_16": "Independent_101_16", "Independent_101_21": "Independent_101_21", "Independent_101_5": "Independent_101_5", "Independent_101_6": "Independent_101_6", "Independent_101_8": "Independent_101_8", "Independent_101_9": "Independent_101_9", "Independent_102_10": "Independent_102_10", "Independent_102_12": "Independent_102_12", "Independent_102_5": "Independent_102_5", "Independent_102_7": "Independent_102_7", "Independent_102_8": "Independent_102_8", "Independent_103_10": "Independent_103_10", "Independent_103_7": "Independent_103_7", "Independent_104_10": "Independent_104_10", "Independent_104_5": "Independent_104_5", "Independent_104_7": "Independent_104_7", "Independent_104_8": "Independent_104_8", "Independent_104_9": "Independent_104_9", "Independent_105_13": "Independent_105_13", "Independent_105_14": "Independent_105_14", "Independent_105_15": "Independent_105_15", "Independent_105_3": "Independent_105_3", "Independent_105_4": "Independent_105_4", "Independent_105_6": "Independent_105_6", "Independent_105_7": "Independent_105_7", "Independent_105_9": "Independent_105_9", "Independent_106_12": "Independent_106_12", "Independent_106_4": "Independent_106_4", "Independent_106_5": "Independent_106_5", "Independent_106_7": "Independent_106_7", "Independent_106_9": "Independent_106_9", "Independent_107_4": "Independent_107_4", "Independent_109_10": "Independent_109_10", "Independent_109_3": "Independent_109_3", "Independent_109_5": "Independent_109_5", "Independent_109_7": "Independent_109_7", "Independent_109_9": "Independent_109_9", "Independent_10_13": "Independent_10_13", "Independent_10_3": "Independent_10_3", "Independent_10_6": "Independent_10_6", "Independent_10_7": "Independent_10_7", "Independent_10_8": "Independent_10_8", "Independent_110_10": "Independent_110_10", "Independent_110_11": "Independent_110_11", "Independent_110_14": "Independent_110_14", "Independent_110_15": "Independent_110_15", "Independent_110_6": "Independent_110_6", "Independent_110_7": "Independent_110_7", "Independent_110_8": "Independent_110_8", "Independent_110_9": "Independent_110_9", "Independent_111_10": "Independent_111_10", "Independent_111_13": "Independent_111_13", "Independent_111_16": "Independent_111_16", "Independent_111_20": "Independent_111_20", "Independent_111_21": "Independent_111_21", "Independent_111_22": "Independent_111_22", "Independent_111_3": "Independent_111_3", "Independent_111_4": "Independent_111_4", "Independent_111_5": "Independent_111_5", "Independent_111_6": "Independent_111_6", "Independent_111_9": "Independent_111_9", "Independent_112_11": "Independent_112_11", "Independent_112_12": "Independent_112_12", "Independent_112_16": "Independent_112_16", "Independent_112_17": "Independent_112_17", "Independent_112_18": "Independent_112_18", "Independent_112_20": "Independent_112_20", "Independent_112_23": "Independent_112_23", "Independent_112_26": "Independent_112_26", "Independent_112_27": "Independent_112_27", "Independent_112_8": "Independent_112_8", "Independent_113_11": "Independent_113_11", "Independent_113_12": "Independent_113_12", "Independent_113_4": "Independent_113_4", "Independent_113_6": "Independent_113_6", "Independent_113_8": "Independent_113_8", "Independent_113_9": "Independent_113_9", "Independent_114_10": "Independent_114_10", "Independent_114_11": "Independent_114_11", "Independent_114_14": "Independent_114_14", "Independent_114_15": "Independent_114_15", "Independent_114_2": "Independent_114_2", "Independent_114_5": "Independent_114_5", "Independent_114_7": "Independent_114_7", "Independent_114_8": "Independent_114_8", "Independent_115_14": "Independent_115_14", "Independent_115_4": "Independent_115_4", "Independent_115_6": "Independent_115_6", "Independent_115_7": "Independent_115_7", "Independent_115_8": "Independent_115_8", "Independent_115_9": "Independent_115_9", "Independent_116_10": "Independent_116_10", "Independent_116_14": "Independent_116_14", "Independent_116_15": "Independent_116_15", "Independent_116_17": "Independent_116_17", "Independent_116_3": "Independent_116_3", "Independent_116_4": "Independent_116_4", "Independent_116_5": "Independent_116_5", "Independent_116_6": "Independent_116_6", "Independent_116_7": "Independent_116_7", "Independent_116_8": "Independent_116_8", "Independent_117_10": "Independent_117_10", "Independent_117_13": "Independent_117_13", "Independent_117_18": "Independent_117_18", "Independent_117_19": "Independent_117_19", "Independent_117_20": "Independent_117_20", "Independent_117_21": "Independent_117_21", "Independent_117_23": "Independent_117_23", "Independent_117_4": "Independent_117_4", "Independent_117_5": "Independent_117_5", "Independent_117_6": "Independent_117_6", "Independent_117_7": "Independent_117_7", "Independent_117_8": "Independent_117_8", "Independent_118_11": "Independent_118_11", "Independent_118_12": "Independent_118_12", "Independent_118_13": "Independent_118_13", "Independent_118_14": "Independent_118_14", "Independent_118_16": "Independent_118_16", "Independent_118_3": "Independent_118_3", "Independent_118_4": "Independent_118_4", "Independent_118_5": "Independent_118_5", "Independent_118_8": "Independent_118_8", "Independent_118_9": "Independent_118_9", "Independent_119_10": "Independent_119_10", "Independent_119_5": "Independent_119_5", "Independent_119_6": "Independent_119_6", "Independent_119_9": "Independent_119_9", "Independent_11_10": "Independent_11_10", "Independent_11_11": "Independent_11_11", "Independent_11_12": "Independent_11_12", "Independent_11_15": "Independent_11_15", "Independent_11_7": "Independent_11_7", "Independent_120_11": "Independent_120_11", "Independent_120_13": "Independent_120_13", "Independent_120_14": "Independent_120_14", "Independent_120_3": "Independent_120_3", "Independent_120_5": "Independent_120_5", "Independent_120_7": "Independent_120_7", "Independent_120_8": "Independent_120_8", "Independent_120_9": "Independent_120_9", "Independent_121_5": "Independent_121_5", "Independent_121_6": "Independent_121_6", "Independent_121_7": "Independent_121_7", "Independent_121_9": "Independent_121_9", "Independent_122_11": "Independent_122_11", "Independent_122_13": "Independent_122_13", "Independent_122_3": "Independent_122_3", "Independent_122_4": "Independent_122_4", "Independent_122_5": "Independent_122_5", "Independent_122_6": "Independent_122_6", "Independent_122_7": "Independent_122_7", "Independent_123_15": "Independent_123_15", "Independent_123_3": "Independent_123_3", "Independent_123_4": "Independent_123_4", "Independent_123_6": "Independent_123_6", "Independent_123_8": "Independent_123_8", "Independent_123_9": "Independent_123_9", "Independent_124_10": "Independent_124_10", "Independent_124_11": "Independent_124_11", "Independent_124_12": "Independent_124_12", "Independent_124_14": "Independent_124_14", "Independent_124_18": "Independent_124_18", "Independent_124_19": "Independent_124_19", "Independent_124_22": "Independent_124_22", "Independent_124_23": "Independent_124_23", "Independent_124_24": "Independent_124_24", "Independent_124_3": "Independent_124_3", "Independent_124_5": "Independent_124_5", "Independent_124_6": "Independent_124_6", "Independent_124_7": "Independent_124_7", "Independent_124_8": "Independent_124_8", "Independent_125_11": "Independent_125_11", "Independent_125_4": "Independent_125_4", "Independent_125_6": "Independent_125_6", "Independent_125_7": "Independent_125_7", "Independent_126_10": "Independent_126_10", "Independent_126_12": "Independent_126_12", "Independent_126_14": "Independent_126_14", "Independent_126_18": "Independent_126_18", "Independent_126_22": "Independent_126_22", "Independent_126_23": "Independent_126_23", "Independent_126_5": "Independent_126_5", "Independent_126_6": "Independent_126_6", "Independent_126_7": "Independent_126_7", "Independent_127_10": "Independent_127_10", "Independent_127_5": "Independent_127_5", "Independent_127_6": "Independent_127_6", "Independent_127_8": "Independent_127_8", "Independent_128_11": "Independent_128_11", "Independent_128_12": "Independent_128_12", "Independent_128_14": "Independent_128_14", "Independent_128_5": "Independent_128_5", "Independent_128_7": "Independent_128_7", "Independent_128_8": "Independent_128_8", "Independent_128_9": "Independent_128_9", "Independent_129_10": "Independent_129_10", "Independent_12_13": "Independent_12_13", "Independent_12_14": "Independent_12_14", "Independent_12_4": "Independent_12_4", "Independent_12_6": "Independent_12_6", "Independent_12_7": "Independent_12_7", "Independent_12_9": "Independent_12_9", "Independent_130_10": "Independent_130_10", "Independent_130_12": "Independent_130_12", "Independent_130_3": "Independent_130_3", "Independent_130_4": "Independent_130_4", "Independent_130_6": "Independent_130_6", "Independent_131_9": "Independent_131_9", "Independent_132_12": "Independent_132_12", "Independent_132_13": "Independent_132_13", "Independent_132_14": "Independent_132_14", "Independent_132_15": "Independent_132_15", "Independent_132_19": "Independent_132_19", "Independent_132_20": "Independent_132_20", "Independent_132_5": "Independent_132_5", "Independent_132_6": "Independent_132_6", "Independent_132_8": "Independent_132_8", "Independent_133_10": "Independent_133_10", "Independent_133_11": "Independent_133_11", "Independent_133_15": "Independent_133_15", "Independent_133_17": "Independent_133_17", "Independent_133_19": "Independent_133_19", "Independent_133_20": "Independent_133_20", "Independent_133_21": "Independent_133_21", "Independent_133_27": "Independent_133_27", "Independent_133_4": "Independent_133_4", "Independent_133_6": "Independent_133_6", "Independent_133_9": "Independent_133_9", "Independent_134_10": "Independent_134_10", "Independent_134_11": "Independent_134_11", "Independent_134_19": "Independent_134_19", "Independent_134_3": "Independent_134_3", "Independent_134_4": "Independent_134_4", "Independent_134_6": "Independent_134_6", "Independent_134_9": "Independent_134_9", "Independent_135_11": "Independent_135_11", "Independent_135_12": "Independent_135_12", "Independent_135_19": "Independent_135_19", "Independent_135_4": "Independent_135_4", "Independent_136_8": "Independent_136_8", "Independent_137_10": "Independent_137_10", "Independent_137_4": "Independent_137_4", "Independent_137_5": "Independent_137_5", "Independent_137_6": "Independent_137_6", "Independent_137_7": "Independent_137_7", "Independent_137_8": "Independent_137_8", "Independent_138_11": "Independent_138_11", "Independent_138_4": "Independent_138_4", "Independent_138_5": "Independent_138_5", "Independent_138_7": "Independent_138_7", "Independent_139_5": "Independent_139_5", "Independent_139_6": "Independent_139_6", "Independent_139_8": "Independent_139_8", "Independent_13_5": "Independent_13_5", "Independent_13_6": "Independent_13_6", "Independent_140_8": "Independent_140_8", "Independent_141_11": "Independent_141_11", "Independent_141_5": "Independent_141_5", "Independent_141_6": "Independent_141_6", "Independent_141_7": "Independent_141_7", "Independent_141_8": "Independent_141_8", "Independent_142_12": "Independent_142_12", "Independent_142_13": "Independent_142_13", "Independent_142_15": "Independent_142_15", "Independent_142_3": "Independent_142_3", "Independent_142_4": "Independent_142_4", "Independent_142_6": "Independent_142_6", "Independent_142_7": "Independent_142_7", "Independent_142_9": "Independent_142_9", "Independent_143_4": "Independent_143_4", "Independent_143_5": "Independent_143_5", "Independent_143_8": "Independent_143_8", "Independent_144_13": "Independent_144_13", "Independent_144_5": "Independent_144_5", "Independent_144_6": "Independent_144_6", "Independent_144_7": "Independent_144_7", "Independent_144_9": "Independent_144_9", "Independent_145_6": "Independent_145_6", "Independent_145_7": "Independent_145_7", "Independent_146_10": "Independent_146_10", "Independent_146_3": "Independent_146_3", "Independent_146_5": "Independent_146_5", "Independent_146_6": "Independent_146_6", "Independent_146_7": "Independent_146_7", "Independent_146_8": "Independent_146_8", "Independent_147_11": "Independent_147_11", "Independent_147_4": "Independent_147_4", "Independent_148_5": "Independent_148_5", "Independent_148_6": "Independent_148_6", "Independent_148_8": "Independent_148_8", "Independent_149_11": "Independent_149_11", "Independent_149_12": "Independent_149_12", "Independent_149_15": "Independent_149_15", "Independent_149_18": "Independent_149_18", "Independent_149_21": "Independent_149_21", "Independent_149_22": "Independent_149_22", "Independent_149_5": "Independent_149_5", "Independent_149_6": "Independent_149_6", "Independent_149_7": "Independent_149_7", "Independent_149_9": "Independent_149_9", "Independent_14_10": "Independent_14_10", "Independent_14_11": "Independent_14_11", "Independent_14_4": "Independent_14_4", "Independent_14_7": "Independent_14_7", "Independent_14_8": "Independent_14_8", "Independent_150_10": "Independent_150_10", "Independent_150_11": "Independent_150_11", "Independent_150_13": "Independent_150_13", "Independent_150_5": "Independent_150_5", "Independent_150_7": "Independent_150_7", "Independent_150_8": "Independent_150_8", "Independent_151_10": "Independent_151_10", "Independent_151_11": "Independent_151_11", "Independent_151_4": "Independent_151_4", "Independent_151_5": "Independent_151_5", "Independent_151_9": "Independent_151_9", "Independent_152_5": "Independent_152_5", "Independent_152_7": "Independent_152_7", "Independent_153_6": "Independent_153_6", "Independent_154_15": "Independent_154_15", "Independent_154_16": "Independent_154_16", "Independent_154_20": "Independent_154_20", "Independent_154_3": "Independent_154_3", "Independent_154_4": "Independent_154_4", "Independent_154_5": "Independent_154_5", "Independent_154_7": "Independent_154_7", "Independent_155_10": "Independent_155_10", "Independent_155_3": "Independent_155_3", "Independent_155_6": "Independent_155_6", "Independent_155_9": "Independent_155_9", "Independent_156_11": "Independent_156_11", "Independent_156_4": "Independent_156_4", "Independent_157_10": "Independent_157_10", "Independent_157_12": "Independent_157_12", "Independent_157_7": "Independent_157_7", "Independent_157_8": "Independent_157_8", "Independent_157_9": "Independent_157_9", "Independent_158_10": "Independent_158_10", "Independent_158_12": "Independent_158_12", "Independent_158_13": "Independent_158_13", "Independent_158_5": "Independent_158_5", "Independent_158_7": "Independent_158_7", "Independent_158_8": "Independent_158_8", "Independent_158_9": "Independent_158_9", "Independent_159_11": "Independent_159_11", "Independent_159_13": "Independent_159_13", "Independent_159_5": "Independent_159_5", "Independent_159_7": "Independent_159_7", "Independent_159_8": "Independent_159_8", "Independent_15_11": "Independent_15_11", "Independent_15_18": "Independent_15_18", "Independent_15_5": "Independent_15_5", "Independent_15_7": "Independent_15_7", "Independent_15_8": "Independent_15_8", "Independent_160_6": "Independent_160_6", "Independent_160_8": "Independent_160_8", "Independent_160_9": "Independent_160_9", "Independent_161_10": "Independent_161_10", "Independent_161_12": "Independent_161_12", "Independent_161_15": "Independent_161_15", "Independent_161_4": "Independent_161_4", "Independent_161_5": "Independent_161_5", "Independent_161_6": "Independent_161_6", "Independent_161_7": "Independent_161_7", "Independent_161_8": "Independent_161_8", "Independent_161_9": "Independent_161_9", "Independent_163_10": "Independent_163_10", "Independent_163_4": "Independent_163_4", "Independent_163_6": "Independent_163_6", "Independent_164_10": "Independent_164_10", "Independent_164_13": "Independent_164_13", "Independent_164_14": "Independent_164_14", "Independent_164_15": "Independent_164_15", "Independent_164_20": "Independent_164_20", "Independent_164_22": "Independent_164_22", "Independent_164_23": "Independent_164_23", "Independent_164_24": "Independent_164_24", "Independent_164_25": "Independent_164_25", "Independent_164_26": "Independent_164_26", "Independent_164_4": "Independent_164_4", "Independent_164_8": "Independent_164_8", "Independent_164_9": "Independent_164_9", "Independent_165_10": "Independent_165_10", "Independent_165_12": "Independent_165_12", "Independent_165_13": "Independent_165_13", "Independent_165_3": "Independent_165_3", "Independent_165_5": "Independent_165_5", "Independent_165_7": "Independent_165_7", "Independent_166_10": "Independent_166_10", "Independent_166_12": "Independent_166_12", "Independent_166_13": "Independent_166_13", "Independent_166_15": "Independent_166_15", "Independent_166_16": "Independent_166_16", "Independent_166_18": "Independent_166_18", "Independent_166_5": "Independent_166_5", "Independent_166_6": "Independent_166_6", "Independent_166_8": "Independent_166_8", "Independent_167_10": "Independent_167_10", "Independent_167_11": "Independent_167_11", "Independent_167_13": "Independent_167_13", "Independent_167_14": "Independent_167_14", "Independent_167_16": "Independent_167_16", "Independent_167_4": "Independent_167_4", "Independent_167_6": "Independent_167_6", "Independent_167_7": "Independent_167_7", "Independent_167_9": "Independent_167_9", "Independent_168_10": "Independent_168_10", "Independent_168_11": "Independent_168_11", "Independent_168_14": "Independent_168_14", "Independent_168_15": "Independent_168_15", "Independent_168_16": "Independent_168_16", "Independent_168_17": "Independent_168_17", "Independent_168_18": "Independent_168_18", "Independent_168_19": "Independent_168_19", "Independent_168_3": "Independent_168_3", "Independent_168_4": "Independent_168_4", "Independent_168_5": "Independent_168_5", "Independent_168_7": "Independent_168_7", "Independent_168_8": "Independent_168_8", "Independent_169_11": "Independent_169_11", "Independent_169_4": "Independent_169_4", "Independent_169_8": "Independent_169_8", "Independent_169_9": "Independent_169_9", "Independent_16_6": "Independent_16_6", "Independent_16_7": "Independent_16_7", "Independent_16_8": "Independent_16_8", "Independent_170_10": "Independent_170_10", "Independent_170_4": "Independent_170_4", "Independent_170_7": "Independent_170_7", "Independent_170_9": "Independent_170_9", "Independent_171_12": "Independent_171_12", "Independent_171_4": "Independent_171_4", "Independent_171_5": "Independent_171_5", "Independent_171_6": "Independent_171_6", "Independent_171_7": "Independent_171_7", "Independent_171_9": "Independent_171_9", "Independent_172_11": "Independent_172_11", "Independent_172_13": "Independent_172_13", "Independent_172_16": "Independent_172_16", "Independent_172_17": "Independent_172_17", "Independent_172_18": "Independent_172_18", "Independent_172_22": "Independent_172_22", "Independent_172_3": "Independent_172_3", "Independent_172_5": "Independent_172_5", "Independent_172_9": "Independent_172_9", "Independent_173_10": "Independent_173_10", "Independent_173_16": "Independent_173_16", "Independent_173_17": "Independent_173_17", "Independent_173_22": "Independent_173_22", "Independent_173_23": "Independent_173_23", "Independent_173_5": "Independent_173_5", "Independent_173_7": "Independent_173_7", "Independent_174_11": "Independent_174_11", "Independent_174_4": "Independent_174_4", "Independent_174_6": "Independent_174_6", "Independent_174_8": "Independent_174_8", "Independent_175_10": "Independent_175_10", "Independent_175_11": "Independent_175_11", "Independent_175_14": "Independent_175_14", "Independent_175_5": "Independent_175_5", "Independent_175_6": "Independent_175_6", "Independent_176_12": "Independent_176_12", "Independent_176_16": "Independent_176_16", "Independent_176_19": "Independent_176_19", "Independent_176_20": "Independent_176_20", "Independent_176_6": "Independent_176_6", "Independent_176_8": "Independent_176_8", "Independent_177_11": "Independent_177_11", "Independent_177_12": "Independent_177_12", "Independent_177_15": "Independent_177_15", "Independent_177_19": "Independent_177_19", "Independent_177_23": "Independent_177_23", "Independent_177_24": "Independent_177_24", "Independent_177_25": "Independent_177_25", "Independent_177_5": "Independent_177_5", "Independent_178_6": "Independent_178_6", "Independent_178_7": "Independent_178_7", "Independent_178_8": "Independent_178_8", "Independent_179_10": "Independent_179_10", "Independent_179_13": "Independent_179_13", "Independent_179_15": "Independent_179_15", "Independent_179_16": "Independent_179_16", "Independent_179_19": "Independent_179_19", "Independent_179_3": "Independent_179_3", "Independent_179_4": "Independent_179_4", "Independent_179_5": "Independent_179_5", "Independent_179_9": "Independent_179_9", "Independent_17_10": "Independent_17_10", "Independent_17_13": "Independent_17_13", "Independent_17_16": "Independent_17_16", "Independent_17_3": "Independent_17_3", "Independent_17_5": "Independent_17_5", "Independent_17_8": "Independent_17_8", "Independent_180_12": "Independent_180_12", "Independent_180_5": "Independent_180_5", "Independent_180_7": "Independent_180_7", "Independent_180_9": "Independent_180_9", "Independent_181_18": "Independent_181_18", "Independent_181_19": "Independent_181_19", "Independent_181_6": "Independent_181_6", "Independent_182_10": "Independent_182_10", "Independent_182_11": "Independent_182_11", "Independent_182_15": "Independent_182_15", "Independent_182_18": "Independent_182_18", "Independent_182_19": "Independent_182_19", "Independent_182_22": "Independent_182_22", "Independent_182_23": "Independent_182_23", "Independent_182_6": "Independent_182_6", "Independent_183_11": "Independent_183_11", "Independent_183_12": "Independent_183_12", "Independent_183_15": "Independent_183_15", "Independent_183_25": "Independent_183_25", "Independent_183_5": "Independent_183_5", "Independent_184_11": "Independent_184_11", "Independent_184_4": "Independent_184_4", "Independent_184_6": "Independent_184_6", "Independent_184_7": "Independent_184_7", "Independent_185_11": "Independent_185_11", "Independent_185_14": "Independent_185_14", "Independent_185_3": "Independent_185_3", "Independent_185_4": "Independent_185_4", "Independent_185_5": "Independent_185_5", "Independent_185_6": "Independent_185_6", "Independent_185_8": "Independent_185_8", "Independent_186_12": "Independent_186_12", "Independent_186_14": "Independent_186_14", "Independent_186_20": "Independent_186_20", "Independent_186_5": "Independent_186_5", "Independent_186_7": "Independent_186_7", "Independent_186_8": "Independent_186_8", "Independent_186_9": "Independent_186_9", "Independent_187_10": "Independent_187_10", "Independent_187_17": "Independent_187_17", "Independent_187_20": "Independent_187_20", "Independent_187_3": "Independent_187_3", "Independent_187_4": "Independent_187_4", "Independent_187_5": "Independent_187_5", "Independent_187_6": "Independent_187_6", "Independent_187_7": "Independent_187_7", "Independent_187_8": "Independent_187_8", "Independent_187_9": "Independent_187_9", "Independent_188_14": "Independent_188_14", "Independent_188_17": "Independent_188_17", "Independent_188_22": "Independent_188_22", "Independent_188_23": "Independent_188_23", "Independent_188_26": "Independent_188_26", "Independent_188_27": "Independent_188_27", "Independent_188_8": "Independent_188_8", "Independent_189_11": "Independent_189_11", "Independent_189_7": "Independent_189_7", "Independent_189_8": "Independent_189_8", "Independent_18_11": "Independent_18_11", "Independent_18_4": "Independent_18_4", "Independent_18_7": "Independent_18_7", "Independent_190_12": "Independent_190_12", "Independent_190_14": "Independent_190_14", "Independent_190_16": "Independent_190_16", "Independent_190_18": "Independent_190_18", "Independent_190_19": "Independent_190_19", "Independent_190_21": "Independent_190_21", "Independent_190_22": "Independent_190_22", "Independent_190_25": "Independent_190_25", "Independent_190_5": "Independent_190_5", "Independent_190_6": "Independent_190_6", "Independent_190_9": "Independent_190_9", "Independent_191_11": "Independent_191_11", "Independent_191_14": "Independent_191_14", "Independent_191_16": "Independent_191_16", "Independent_191_2": "Independent_191_2", "Independent_191_4": "Independent_191_4", "Independent_191_6": "Independent_191_6", "Independent_191_7": "Independent_191_7", "Independent_192_11": "Independent_192_11", "Independent_193_10": "Independent_193_10", "Independent_193_3": "Independent_193_3", "Independent_193_5": "Independent_193_5", "Independent_193_8": "Independent_193_8", "Independent_194_11": "Independent_194_11", "Independent_194_13": "Independent_194_13", "Independent_194_14": "Independent_194_14", "Independent_194_15": "Independent_194_15", "Independent_194_16": "Independent_194_16", "Independent_194_3": "Independent_194_3", "Independent_194_4": "Independent_194_4", "Independent_195_10": "Independent_195_10", "Independent_195_8": "Independent_195_8", "Independent_195_9": "Independent_195_9", "Independent_196_2": "Independent_196_2", "Independent_196_7": "Independent_196_7", "Independent_196_8": "Independent_196_8", "Independent_197_10": "Independent_197_10", "Independent_197_14": "Independent_197_14", "Independent_197_4": "Independent_197_4", "Independent_197_7": "Independent_197_7", "Independent_197_8": "Independent_197_8", "Independent_198_10": "Independent_198_10", "Independent_198_13": "Independent_198_13", "Independent_198_15": "Independent_198_15", "Independent_198_17": "Independent_198_17", "Independent_198_19": "Independent_198_19", "Independent_198_2": "Independent_198_2", "Independent_198_21": "Independent_198_21", "Independent_198_22": "Independent_198_22", "Independent_198_4": "Independent_198_4", "Independent_198_6": "Independent_198_6", "Independent_198_9": "Independent_198_9", "Independent_199_12": "Independent_199_12", "Independent_199_13": "Independent_199_13", "Independent_199_5": "Independent_199_5", "Independent_199_7": "Independent_199_7", "Independent_199_8": "Independent_199_8", "Independent_19_10": "Independent_19_10", "Independent_19_5": "Independent_19_5", "Independent_19_6": "Independent_19_6", "Independent_1_10": "Independent_1_10", "Independent_1_11": "Independent_1_11", "Independent_1_12": "Independent_1_12", "Independent_1_13": "Independent_1_13", "Independent_200_12": "Independent_200_12", "Independent_200_13": "Independent_200_13", "Independent_200_14": "Independent_200_14", "Independent_200_4": "Independent_200_4", "Independent_200_6": "Independent_200_6", "Independent_200_7": "Independent_200_7", "Independent_200_8": "Independent_200_8", "Independent_200_9": "Independent_200_9", "Independent_201_11": "Independent_201_11", "Independent_201_13": "Independent_201_13", "Independent_201_14": "Independent_201_14", "Independent_201_15": "Independent_201_15", "Independent_201_17": "Independent_201_17", "Independent_201_18": "Independent_201_18", "Independent_201_19": "Independent_201_19", "Independent_201_4": "Independent_201_4", "Independent_201_5": "Independent_201_5", "Independent_201_7": "Independent_201_7", "Independent_201_8": "Independent_201_8", "Independent_202_5": "Independent_202_5", "Independent_202_7": "Independent_202_7", "Independent_202_8": "Independent_202_8", "Independent_202_9": "Independent_202_9", "Independent_203_10": "Independent_203_10", "Independent_203_11": "Independent_203_11", "Independent_203_12": "Independent_203_12", "Independent_203_13": "Independent_203_13", "Independent_203_5": "Independent_203_5", "Independent_203_7": "Independent_203_7", "Independent_203_9": "Independent_203_9", "Independent_204_11": "Independent_204_11", "Independent_204_12": "Independent_204_12", "Independent_204_13": "Independent_204_13", "Independent_204_6": "Independent_204_6", "Independent_204_7": "Independent_204_7", "Independent_204_8": "Independent_204_8", "Independent_205_11": "Independent_205_11", "Independent_205_12": "Independent_205_12", "Independent_205_4": "Independent_205_4", "Independent_205_6": "Independent_205_6", "Independent_205_8": "Independent_205_8", "Independent_206_15": "Independent_206_15", "Independent_206_16": "Independent_206_16", "Independent_206_19": "Independent_206_19", "Independent_206_3": "Independent_206_3", "Independent_206_5": "Independent_206_5", "Independent_206_6": "Independent_206_6", "Independent_206_7": "Independent_206_7", "Independent_206_9": "Independent_206_9", "Independent_207_10": "Independent_207_10", "Independent_207_11": "Independent_207_11", "Independent_207_15": "Independent_207_15", "Independent_207_6": "Independent_207_6", "Independent_207_7": "Independent_207_7", "Independent_207_9": "Independent_207_9", "Independent_208_14": "Independent_208_14", "Independent_208_16": "Independent_208_16", "Independent_208_18": "Independent_208_18", "Independent_208_4": "Independent_208_4", "Independent_208_5": "Independent_208_5", "Independent_208_6": "Independent_208_6", "Independent_208_7": "Independent_208_7", "Independent_208_8": "Independent_208_8", "Independent_209_10": "Independent_209_10", "Independent_209_11": "Independent_209_11", "Independent_209_12": "Independent_209_12", "Independent_209_13": "Independent_209_13", "Independent_209_15": "Independent_209_15", "Independent_209_5": "Independent_209_5", "Independent_209_6": "Independent_209_6", "Independent_209_8": "Independent_209_8", "Independent_20_10": "Independent_20_10", "Independent_20_13": "Independent_20_13", "Independent_20_14": "Independent_20_14", "Independent_20_16": "Independent_20_16", "Independent_20_22": "Independent_20_22", "Independent_20_24": "Independent_20_24", "Independent_20_3": "Independent_20_3", "Independent_20_4": "Independent_20_4", "Independent_20_5": "Independent_20_5", "Independent_20_7": "Independent_20_7", "Independent_210_10": "Independent_210_10", "Independent_210_11": "Independent_210_11", "Independent_210_13": "Independent_210_13", "Independent_210_14": "Independent_210_14", "Independent_210_5": "Independent_210_5", "Independent_210_6": "Independent_210_6", "Independent_210_8": "Independent_210_8", "Independent_210_9": "Independent_210_9", "Independent_211_5": "Independent_211_5", "Independent_211_7": "Independent_211_7", "Independent_212_10": "Independent_212_10", "Independent_212_11": "Independent_212_11", "Independent_212_12": "Independent_212_12", "Independent_212_13": "Independent_212_13", "Independent_212_5": "Independent_212_5", "Independent_212_7": "Independent_212_7", "Independent_212_8": "Independent_212_8", "Independent_213_10": "Independent_213_10", "Independent_213_11": "Independent_213_11", "Independent_213_12": "Independent_213_12", "Independent_213_13": "Independent_213_13", "Independent_213_6": "Independent_213_6", "Independent_213_7": "Independent_213_7", "Independent_213_8": "Independent_213_8", "Independent_214_13": "Independent_214_13", "Independent_214_17": "Independent_214_17", "Independent_214_20": "Independent_214_20", "Independent_214_22": "Independent_214_22", "Independent_214_23": "Independent_214_23", "Independent_214_24": "Independent_214_24", "Independent_214_6": "Independent_214_6", "Independent_214_7": "Independent_214_7", "Independent_215_10": "Independent_215_10", "Independent_215_12": "Independent_215_12", "Independent_215_15": "Independent_215_15", "Independent_215_17": "Independent_215_17", "Independent_215_5": "Independent_215_5", "Independent_215_7": "Independent_215_7", "Independent_215_8": "Independent_215_8", "Independent_216_7": "Independent_216_7", "Independent_216_8": "Independent_216_8", "Independent_217_11": "Independent_217_11", "Independent_217_12": "Independent_217_12", "Independent_217_5": "Independent_217_5", "Independent_217_6": "Independent_217_6", "Independent_217_7": "Independent_217_7", "Independent_217_9": "Independent_217_9", "Independent_218_4": "Independent_218_4", "Independent_218_7": "Independent_218_7", "Independent_218_9": "Independent_218_9", "Independent_219_10": "Independent_219_10", "Independent_219_12": "Independent_219_12", "Independent_219_13": "Independent_219_13", "Independent_219_15": "Independent_219_15", "Independent_219_18": "Independent_219_18", "Independent_219_4": "Independent_219_4", "Independent_219_5": "Independent_219_5", "Independent_219_7": "Independent_219_7", "Independent_219_8": "Independent_219_8", "Independent_21_5": "Independent_21_5", "Independent_21_8": "Independent_21_8", "Independent_21_9": "Independent_21_9", "Independent_220_5": "Independent_220_5", "Independent_221_10": "Independent_221_10", "Independent_221_6": "Independent_221_6", "Independent_221_8": "Independent_221_8", "Independent_221_9": "Independent_221_9", "Independent_222_10": "Independent_222_10", "Independent_222_15": "Independent_222_15", "Independent_222_3": "Independent_222_3", "Independent_222_6": "Independent_222_6", "Independent_222_9": "Independent_222_9", "Independent_223_4": "Independent_223_4", "Independent_224_12": "Independent_224_12", "Independent_224_2": "Independent_224_2", "Independent_224_6": "Independent_224_6", "Independent_224_8": "Independent_224_8", "Independent_225_13": "Independent_225_13", "Independent_225_17": "Independent_225_17", "Independent_225_18": "Independent_225_18", "Independent_225_23": "Independent_225_23", "Independent_225_6": "Independent_225_6", "Independent_225_8": "Independent_225_8", "Independent_225_9": "Independent_225_9", "Independent_226_12": "Independent_226_12", "Independent_226_7": "Independent_226_7", "Independent_226_8": "Independent_226_8", "Independent_226_9": "Independent_226_9", "Independent_227_8": "Independent_227_8", "Independent_227_9": "Independent_227_9", "Independent_228_5": "Independent_228_5", "Independent_228_6": "Independent_228_6", "Independent_228_9": "Independent_228_9", "Independent_229_12": "Independent_229_12", "Independent_229_13": "Independent_229_13", "Independent_229_4": "Independent_229_4", "Independent_229_6": "Independent_229_6", "Independent_22_10": "Independent_22_10", "Independent_22_11": "Independent_22_11", "Independent_22_4": "Independent_22_4", "Independent_22_6": "Independent_22_6", "Independent_230_11": "Independent_230_11", "Independent_230_22": "Independent_230_22", "Independent_230_25": "Independent_230_25", "Independent_230_26": "Independent_230_26", "Independent_230_27": "Independent_230_27", "Independent_230_28": "Independent_230_28", "Independent_230_4": "Independent_230_4", "Independent_230_9": "Independent_230_9", "Independent_231_10": "Independent_231_10", "Independent_231_13": "Independent_231_13", "Independent_231_14": "Independent_231_14", "Independent_231_24": "Independent_231_24", "Independent_231_25": "Independent_231_25", "Independent_232_4": "Independent_232_4", "Independent_232_7": "Independent_232_7", "Independent_232_8": "Independent_232_8", "Independent_232_9": "Independent_232_9", "Independent_233_11": "Independent_233_11", "Independent_233_12": "Independent_233_12", "Independent_233_6": "Independent_233_6", "Independent_233_7": "Independent_233_7", "Independent_233_8": "Independent_233_8", "Independent_233_9": "Independent_233_9", "Independent_234_10": "Independent_234_10", "Independent_234_14": "Independent_234_14", "Independent_234_15": "Independent_234_15", "Independent_234_20": "Independent_234_20", "Independent_234_22": "Independent_234_22", "Independent_234_3": "Independent_234_3", "Independent_234_7": "Independent_234_7", "Independent_234_8": "Independent_234_8", "Independent_234_9": "Independent_234_9", "Independent_235_11": "Independent_235_11", "Independent_235_12": "Independent_235_12", "Independent_235_14": "Independent_235_14", "Independent_235_16": "Independent_235_16", "Independent_235_3": "Independent_235_3", "Independent_235_4": "Independent_235_4", "Independent_235_5": "Independent_235_5", "Independent_235_6": "Independent_235_6", "Independent_235_7": "Independent_235_7", "Independent_235_8": "Independent_235_8", "Independent_236_5": "Independent_236_5", "Independent_236_8": "Independent_236_8", "Independent_237_10": "Independent_237_10", "Independent_237_11": "Independent_237_11", "Independent_237_12": "Independent_237_12", "Independent_237_13": "Independent_237_13", "Independent_237_14": "Independent_237_14", "Independent_237_2": "Independent_237_2", "Independent_237_4": "Independent_237_4", "Independent_237_5": "Independent_237_5", "Independent_237_9": "Independent_237_9", "Independent_238_11": "Independent_238_11", "Independent_238_13": "Independent_238_13", "Independent_238_15": "Independent_238_15", "Independent_238_5": "Independent_238_5", "Independent_238_7": "Independent_238_7", "Independent_238_8": "Independent_238_8", "Independent_239_3": "Independent_239_3", "Independent_239_8": "Independent_239_8", "Independent_23_11": "Independent_23_11", "Independent_23_18": "Independent_23_18", "Independent_23_19": "Independent_23_19", "Independent_23_20": "Independent_23_20", "Independent_23_23": "Independent_23_23", "Independent_23_4": "Independent_23_4", "Independent_23_6": "Independent_23_6", "Independent_23_7": "Independent_23_7", "Independent_240_10": "Independent_240_10", "Independent_240_11": "Independent_240_11", "Independent_240_3": "Independent_240_3", "Independent_240_5": "Independent_240_5", "Independent_240_7": "Independent_240_7", "Independent_240_8": "Independent_240_8", "Independent_241_14": "Independent_241_14", "Independent_241_15": "Independent_241_15", "Independent_241_4": "Independent_241_4", "Independent_241_6": "Independent_241_6", "Independent_241_9": "Independent_241_9", "Independent_242_10": "Independent_242_10", "Independent_242_11": "Independent_242_11", "Independent_242_6": "Independent_242_6", "Independent_242_7": "Independent_242_7", "Independent_242_8": "Independent_242_8", "Independent_243_1": "Independent_243_1", "Independent_243_13": "Independent_243_13", "Independent_243_7": "Independent_243_7", "Independent_243_9": "Independent_243_9", "Independent_24_12": "Independent_24_12", "Independent_24_5": "Independent_24_5", "Independent_24_6": "Independent_24_6", "Independent_24_7": "Independent_24_7", "Independent_24_9": "Independent_24_9", "Independent_25_10": "Independent_25_10", "Independent_25_11": "Independent_25_11", "Independent_25_6": "Independent_25_6", "Independent_25_7": "Independent_25_7", "Independent_26_4": "Independent_26_4", "Independent_26_5": "Independent_26_5", "Independent_26_6": "Independent_26_6", "Independent_27_11": "Independent_27_11", "Independent_27_13": "Independent_27_13", "Independent_27_18": "Independent_27_18", "Independent_27_6": "Independent_27_6", "Independent_27_7": "Independent_27_7", "Independent_27_8": "Independent_27_8", "Independent_28_5": "Independent_28_5", "Independent_28_9": "Independent_28_9", "Independent_29_7": "Independent_29_7", "Independent_2_10": "Independent_2_10", "Independent_2_11": "Independent_2_11", "Independent_2_7": "Independent_2_7", "Independent_2_9": "Independent_2_9", "Independent_30_10": "Independent_30_10", "Independent_30_11": "Independent_30_11", "Independent_30_13": "Independent_30_13", "Independent_30_6": "Independent_30_6", "Independent_30_7": "Independent_30_7", "Independent_31_10": "Independent_31_10", "Independent_31_11": "Independent_31_11", "Independent_31_13": "Independent_31_13", "Independent_31_15": "Independent_31_15", "Independent_31_3": "Independent_31_3", "Independent_31_6": "Independent_31_6", "Independent_31_7": "Independent_31_7", "Independent_31_9": "Independent_31_9", "Independent_32_11": "Independent_32_11", "Independent_32_12": "Independent_32_12", "Independent_32_14": "Independent_32_14", "Independent_32_15": "Independent_32_15", "Independent_32_16": "Independent_32_16", "Independent_32_3": "Independent_32_3", "Independent_32_4": "Independent_32_4", "Independent_32_5": "Independent_32_5", "Independent_32_6": "Independent_32_6", "Independent_32_7": "Independent_32_7", "Independent_33_11": "Independent_33_11", "Independent_33_20": "Independent_33_20", "Independent_33_21": "Independent_33_21", "Independent_33_22": "Independent_33_22", "Independent_33_23": "Independent_33_23", "Independent_33_4": "Independent_33_4", "Independent_33_5": "Independent_33_5", "Independent_33_7": "Independent_33_7", "Independent_34_7": "Independent_34_7", "Independent_35_10": "Independent_35_10", "Independent_35_12": "Independent_35_12", "Independent_35_13": "Independent_35_13", "Independent_35_14": "Independent_35_14", "Independent_35_4": "Independent_35_4", "Independent_35_5": "Independent_35_5", "Independent_35_9": "Independent_35_9", "Independent_36_10": "Independent_36_10", "Independent_36_13": "Independent_36_13", "Independent_36_4": "Independent_36_4", "Independent_36_6": "Independent_36_6", "Independent_37_4": "Independent_37_4", "Independent_37_7": "Independent_37_7", "Independent_38_10": "Independent_38_10", "Independent_38_15": "Independent_38_15", "Independent_38_18": "Independent_38_18", "Independent_38_3": "Independent_38_3", "Independent_38_4": "Independent_38_4", "Independent_38_6": "Independent_38_6", "Independent_38_7": "Independent_38_7", "Independent_38_9": "Independent_38_9", "Independent_39_10": "Independent_39_10", "Independent_39_15": "Independent_39_15", "Independent_39_4": "Independent_39_4", "Independent_39_6": "Independent_39_6", "Independent_39_9": "Independent_39_9", "Independent_3_14": "Independent_3_14", "Independent_3_15": "Independent_3_15", "Independent_3_19": "Independent_3_19", "Independent_3_3": "Independent_3_3", "Independent_3_6": "Independent_3_6", "Independent_3_7": "Independent_3_7", "Independent_3_9": "Independent_3_9", "Independent_40_4": "Independent_40_4", "Independent_40_6": "Independent_40_6", "Independent_40_9": "Independent_40_9", "Independent_41_7": "Independent_41_7", "Independent_41_8": "Independent_41_8", "Independent_41_9": "Independent_41_9", "Independent_42_13": "Independent_42_13", "Independent_42_6": "Independent_42_6", "Independent_42_9": "Independent_42_9", "Independent_43_4": "Independent_43_4", "Independent_45_11": "Independent_45_11", "Independent_45_12": "Independent_45_12", "Independent_45_13": "Independent_45_13", "Independent_45_14": "Independent_45_14", "Independent_45_17": "Independent_45_17", "Independent_45_18": "Independent_45_18", "Independent_45_20": "Independent_45_20", "Independent_45_3": "Independent_45_3", "Independent_45_5": "Independent_45_5", "Independent_45_6": "Independent_45_6", "Independent_45_7": "Independent_45_7", "Independent_45_8": "Independent_45_8", "Independent_46_13": "Independent_46_13", "Independent_46_14": "Independent_46_14", "Independent_46_4": "Independent_46_4", "Independent_46_7": "Independent_46_7", "Independent_46_8": "Independent_46_8", "Independent_47_6": "Independent_47_6", "Independent_47_8": "Independent_47_8", "Independent_48_3": "Independent_48_3", "Independent_48_7": "Independent_48_7", "Independent_49_12": "Independent_49_12", "Independent_49_7": "Independent_49_7", "Independent_49_8": "Independent_49_8", "Independent_49_9": "Independent_49_9", "Independent_4_13": "Independent_4_13", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "Independent_4_6": "Independent_4_6", "Independent_50_4": "Independent_50_4", "Independent_51_11": "Independent_51_11", "Independent_51_12": "Independent_51_12", "Independent_51_13": "Independent_51_13", "Independent_51_14": "Independent_51_14", "Independent_51_3": "Independent_51_3", "Independent_51_4": "Independent_51_4", "Independent_51_5": "Independent_51_5", "Independent_51_7": "Independent_51_7", "Independent_51_8": "Independent_51_8", "Independent_52_8": "Independent_52_8", "Independent_52_9": "Independent_52_9", "Independent_53_11": "Independent_53_11", "Independent_53_2": "Independent_53_2", "Independent_53_6": "Independent_53_6", "Independent_54_10": "Independent_54_10", "Independent_54_11": "Independent_54_11", "Independent_54_12": "Independent_54_12", "Independent_54_13": "Independent_54_13", "Independent_54_4": "Independent_54_4", "Independent_54_5": "Independent_54_5", "Independent_54_6": "Independent_54_6", "Independent_54_8": "Independent_54_8", "Independent_55_10": "Independent_55_10", "Independent_55_12": "Independent_55_12", "Independent_55_13": "Independent_55_13", "Independent_55_5": "Independent_55_5", "Independent_55_7": "Independent_55_7", "Independent_55_8": "Independent_55_8", "Independent_56_11": "Independent_56_11", "Independent_56_9": "Independent_56_9", "Independent_57_11": "Independent_57_11", "Independent_57_12": "Independent_57_12", "Independent_57_4": "Independent_57_4", "Independent_57_6": "Independent_57_6", "Independent_58_4": "Independent_58_4", "Independent_59_4": "Independent_59_4", "Independent_59_6": "Independent_59_6", "Independent_59_8": "Independent_59_8", "Independent_5_5": "Independent_5_5", "Independent_5_6": "Independent_5_6", "Independent_5_8": "Independent_5_8", "Independent_60_14": "Independent_60_14", "Independent_60_4": "Independent_60_4", "Independent_60_5": "Independent_60_5", "Independent_60_7": "Independent_60_7", "Independent_60_9": "Independent_60_9", "Independent_61_10": "Independent_61_10", "Independent_61_12": "Independent_61_12", "Independent_61_13": "Independent_61_13", "Independent_61_4": "Independent_61_4", "Independent_61_6": "Independent_61_6", "Independent_61_7": "Independent_61_7", "Independent_61_8": "Independent_61_8", "Independent_62_13": "Independent_62_13", "Independent_62_16": "Independent_62_16", "Independent_62_17": "Independent_62_17", "Independent_62_22": "Independent_62_22", "Independent_62_23": "Independent_62_23", "Independent_62_5": "Independent_62_5", "Independent_62_7": "Independent_62_7", "Independent_62_8": "Independent_62_8", "Independent_62_9": "Independent_62_9", "Independent_63_12": "Independent_63_12", "Independent_63_14": "Independent_63_14", "Independent_63_15": "Independent_63_15", "Independent_63_16": "Independent_63_16", "Independent_63_3": "Independent_63_3", "Independent_63_5": "Independent_63_5", "Independent_63_6": "Independent_63_6", "Independent_63_7": "Independent_63_7", "Independent_63_8": "Independent_63_8", "Independent_64_11": "Independent_64_11", "Independent_64_4": "Independent_64_4", "Independent_64_5": "Independent_64_5", "Independent_64_6": "Independent_64_6", "Independent_64_8": "Independent_64_8", "Independent_64_9": "Independent_64_9", "Independent_65_12": "Independent_65_12", "Independent_65_13": "Independent_65_13", "Independent_65_4": "Independent_65_4", "Independent_65_7": "Independent_65_7", "Independent_66_10": "Independent_66_10", "Independent_66_11": "Independent_66_11", "Independent_66_3": "Independent_66_3", "Independent_66_4": "Independent_66_4", "Independent_66_5": "Independent_66_5", "Independent_66_6": "Independent_66_6", "Independent_67_5": "Independent_67_5", "Independent_67_7": "Independent_67_7", "Independent_67_8": "Independent_67_8", "Independent_68_6": "Independent_68_6", "Independent_68_9": "Independent_68_9", "Independent_69_6": "Independent_69_6", "Independent_69_8": "Independent_69_8", "Independent_69_9": "Independent_69_9", "Independent_6_11": "Independent_6_11", "Independent_6_13": "Independent_6_13", "Independent_6_14": "Independent_6_14", "Independent_6_3": "Independent_6_3", "Independent_6_5": "Independent_6_5", "Independent_6_6": "Independent_6_6", "Independent_6_8": "Independent_6_8", "Independent_71_15": "Independent_71_15", "Independent_71_18": "Independent_71_18", "Independent_71_22": "Independent_71_22", "Independent_71_23": "Independent_71_23", "Independent_71_8": "Independent_71_8", "Independent_73_11": "Independent_73_11", "Independent_73_12": "Independent_73_12", "Independent_73_13": "Independent_73_13", "Independent_73_14": "Independent_73_14", "Independent_73_15": "Independent_73_15", "Independent_73_19": "Independent_73_19", "Independent_73_5": "Independent_73_5", "Independent_73_6": "Independent_73_6", "Independent_73_7": "Independent_73_7", "Independent_73_8": "Independent_73_8", "Independent_73_9": "Independent_73_9", "Independent_74_10": "Independent_74_10", "Independent_74_13": "Independent_74_13", "Independent_74_4": "Independent_74_4", "Independent_74_6": "Independent_74_6", "Independent_74_7": "Independent_74_7", "Independent_74_9": "Independent_74_9", "Independent_75_13": "Independent_75_13", "Independent_75_3": "Independent_75_3", "Independent_75_4": "Independent_75_4", "Independent_75_6": "Independent_75_6", "Independent_75_7": "Independent_75_7", "Independent_76_14": "Independent_76_14", "Independent_76_21": "Independent_76_21", "Independent_76_22": "Independent_76_22", "Independent_76_23": "Independent_76_23", "Independent_76_5": "Independent_76_5", "Independent_76_7": "Independent_76_7", "Independent_76_8": "Independent_76_8", "Independent_76_9": "Independent_76_9", "Independent_77_4": "Independent_77_4", "Independent_77_5": "Independent_77_5", "Independent_77_9": "Independent_77_9", "Independent_78_10": "Independent_78_10", "Independent_78_4": "Independent_78_4", "Independent_78_5": "Independent_78_5", "Independent_79_17": "Independent_79_17", "Independent_79_19": "Independent_79_19", "Independent_79_21": "Independent_79_21", "Independent_79_24": "Independent_79_24", "Independent_79_25": "Independent_79_25", "Independent_79_4": "Independent_79_4", "Independent_79_5": "Independent_79_5", "Independent_79_6": "Independent_79_6", "Independent_79_8": "Independent_79_8", "Independent_79_9": "Independent_79_9", "Independent_7_11": "Independent_7_11", "Independent_7_3": "Independent_7_3", "Independent_7_6": "Independent_7_6", "Independent_7_7": "Independent_7_7", "Independent_7_8": "Independent_7_8", "Independent_80_11": "Independent_80_11", "Independent_80_12": "Independent_80_12", "Independent_80_14": "Independent_80_14", "Independent_80_15": "Independent_80_15", "Independent_80_4": "Independent_80_4", "Independent_80_7": "Independent_80_7", "Independent_80_8": "Independent_80_8", "Independent_81_13": "Independent_81_13", "Independent_81_5": "Independent_81_5", "Independent_81_7": "Independent_81_7", "Independent_81_8": "Independent_81_8", "Independent_81_9": "Independent_81_9", "Independent_82_5": "Independent_82_5", "Independent_82_6": "Independent_82_6", "Independent_83_14": "Independent_83_14", "Independent_83_3": "Independent_83_3", "Independent_83_4": "Independent_83_4", "Independent_83_6": "Independent_83_6", "Independent_84_4": "Independent_84_4", "Independent_84_6": "Independent_84_6", "Independent_84_7": "Independent_84_7", "Independent_84_8": "Independent_84_8", "Independent_85_4": "Independent_85_4", "Independent_85_6": "Independent_85_6", "Independent_85_8": "Independent_85_8", "Independent_86_11": "Independent_86_11", "Independent_86_12": "Independent_86_12", "Independent_86_13": "Independent_86_13", "Independent_86_3": "Independent_86_3", "Independent_86_6": "Independent_86_6", "Independent_86_7": "Independent_86_7", "Independent_87_10": "Independent_87_10", "Independent_87_4": "Independent_87_4", "Independent_87_6": "Independent_87_6", "Independent_87_8": "Independent_87_8", "Independent_87_9": "Independent_87_9", "Independent_88_10": "Independent_88_10", "Independent_88_13": "Independent_88_13", "Independent_88_14": "Independent_88_14", "Independent_88_15": "Independent_88_15", "Independent_88_19": "Independent_88_19", "Independent_88_20": "Independent_88_20", "Independent_88_22": "Independent_88_22", "Independent_88_26": "Independent_88_26", "Independent_88_28": "Independent_88_28", "Independent_88_29": "Independent_88_29", "Independent_88_31": "Independent_88_31", "Independent_88_32": "Independent_88_32", "Independent_88_4": "Independent_88_4", "Independent_88_6": "Independent_88_6", "Independent_89_11": "Independent_89_11", "Independent_89_13": "Independent_89_13", "Independent_89_3": "Independent_89_3", "Independent_89_4": "Independent_89_4", "Independent_8_7": "Independent_8_7", "Independent_90_12": "Independent_90_12", "Independent_90_13": "Independent_90_13", "Independent_90_17": "Independent_90_17", "Independent_90_4": "Independent_90_4", "Independent_90_7": "Independent_90_7", "Independent_90_8": "Independent_90_8", "Independent_90_9": "Independent_90_9", "Independent_91_10": "Independent_91_10", "Independent_91_6": "Independent_91_6", "Independent_91_7": "Independent_91_7", "Independent_91_8": "Independent_91_8", "Independent_92_5": "Independent_92_5", "Independent_92_6": "Independent_92_6", "Independent_93_4": "Independent_93_4", "Independent_93_7": "Independent_93_7", "Independent_93_9": "Independent_93_9", "Independent_94_11": "Independent_94_11", "Independent_94_16": "Independent_94_16", "Independent_94_18": "Independent_94_18", "Independent_94_20": "Independent_94_20", "Independent_94_23": "Independent_94_23", "Independent_94_27": "Independent_94_27", "Independent_94_28": "Independent_94_28", "Independent_94_29": "Independent_94_29", "Independent_95_10": "Independent_95_10", "Independent_95_19": "Independent_95_19", "Independent_95_2": "Independent_95_2", "Independent_95_20": "Independent_95_20", "Independent_95_5": "Independent_95_5", "Independent_96_4": "Independent_96_4", "Independent_96_6": "Independent_96_6", "Independent_96_7": "Independent_96_7", "Independent_96_8": "Independent_96_8", "Independent_96_9": "Independent_96_9", "Independent_97_12": "Independent_97_12", "Independent_97_2": "Independent_97_2", "Independent_97_6": "Independent_97_6", "Independent_97_8": "Independent_97_8", "Independent_97_9": "Independent_97_9", "Independent_98_10": "Independent_98_10", "Independent_98_19": "Independent_98_19", "Independent_98_20": "Independent_98_20", "Independent_98_21": "Independent_98_21", "Independent_98_8": "Independent_98_8", "Independent_99_11": "Independent_99_11", "Independent_99_12": "Independent_99_12", "Independent_99_13": "Independent_99_13", "Independent_99_3": "Independent_99_3", "Independent_99_5": "Independent_99_5", "Independent_99_6": "Independent_99_6", "Independent_99_8": "Independent_99_8", "Independent_9_14": "Independent_9_14", "Independent_9_2": "Independent_9_2", "Independent_9_5": "Independent_9_5", "Independent_9_7": "Independent_9_7", "Independent_9_8": "Independent_9_8", "Independent_9_9": "Independent_9_9", "JAC": "JAC", "JANADIP": "JANADIP", "JAPL": "JAPL", "JASP": "JASP", "JD(S)": "JD(S)", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "JDR": "JDR", "JGHTP": "JGHTP", "JHP": "JHP", "JKM": "JKM", "JKiP": "JKiP", "JMBP": "JMBP", "JMM": "JMM", "JMVP": "JMVP", "JNSHKVPD": "JNSHKVPD", "JNSNGHDL": "JNSNGHDL", "JP": "JP", "JPJD": "JPJD", "JPS": "JPS", "JRJP": "JRJP", "JRVP": "JRVP", "JSVP": "JSVP", "JTLP": "JTLP", "JTVP": "JTVP", "JmtP": "JmtP", "KPOI": "KPOI", "KSLJNP": "KSLJNP", "LAJSP": "LAJSP", "LCD": "LCD", "LGJNPSCL": "LGJNPSCL", "LJD": "LJD", "LJP": "LJP", "LJVM": "LJVM", "LKSHPLK": "LKSHPLK", "LOKJANP": "LOKJANP", "LPSP": "LPSP", "LSD": "LSD", "LSMP": "LSMP", "LSSP": "LSSP", "LSWP": "LSWP", "MADP": "MADP", "MKDVP": "MKDVP", "MOSP": "MOSP", "MZEKP": "MZEKP", "ManJP": "ManJP", "NCP": "NCP", "NFDEP": "NFDEP", "NJANP": "NJANP", "NJP": "NJP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "NPEP": "NPEP", "NTP": "NTP", "PBI": "PBI", "PBLBRP": "PBLBRP", "PECP": "PECP", "PMP": "PMP", "PMPT": "PMPT", "PPID": "PPID", "PRAJAP": "PRAJAP", "PSS": "PSS", "RAUNTP": "RAUNTP", "RDU": "RDU", "RGPP": "RGPP", "RJANSWP": "RJANSWP", "RJBP": "RJBP", "RJCHD": "RJCHD", "RJD": "RJD", "RJJM": "RJJM", "RJKPS": "RJKPS", "RJPD": "RJPD", "RJPty": "RJPty", "RJSPS": "RJSPS", "RJnJnP": "RJnJnP", "RLSP": "RLSP", "RMGP": "RMGP", "RPI": "RPI", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "RPIRASH": "RPIRASH", "RPPRINAT": "RPPRINAT", "RSMD": "RSMD", "RSPS": "RSPS", "RSSCMJP": "RSSCMJP", "RSTJLKPS": "RSTJLKPS", "RSTJNVKSP": "RSTJNVKSP", "RSTSAHP": "RSTSAHP", "RSTSWNTP": "RSTSWNTP", "RSTWDMNRTP": "RSTWDMNRTP", "RSWD": "RSWD", "RTJHPR": "RTJHPR", "RTJPS": "RTJPS", "RTMNSWP": "RTMNSWP", "RTORP": "RTORP", "RTPP": "RTPP", "RTSHD": "RTSHD", "RTSMJD": "RTSMJD", "RUC": "RUC", "RVNP": "RVNP", "RWJS": "RWJS", "RaJPa": "RaJPa", "SAAFP": "SAAFP", "SAMDAL": "SAMDAL", "SANKISVP": "SANKISVP", "SANVP": "SANVP", "SAP": "SAP", "SBSP": "SBSP", "SBSPSP": "SBSPSP", "SDPI": "SDPI", "SHD": "SHD", "SHS": "SHS", "SHtP": "SHtP", "SJDD": "SJDD", "SJPB": "SJPB", "SP(I)": "SP(I)", "SPAKP": "SPAKP", "SPL": "SPL", "SRSMJNP": "SRSMJNP", "SSD": "SSD", "SUCI": "SUCI", "SWAP": "SWAP", "SWARAJ": "SWARAJ", "SWSP": "SWSP", "SaBP": "SaBP", "SatBP": "SatBP", "TPLRSP": "TPLRSP", "VBA": "VBA", "VCSMP": "VCSMP", "VPI": "VPI", "VSIP": "VSIP", "WAP": "WAP", "YBS": "YBS", "YGKRTDL": "YGKRTDL", "YKP": "YKP", "mimm": "mimm", "pms": "pms"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 243, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 243, "cast_gt_registered": 243}, "n_stations_flagged": 243, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:30:24.126788", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.39, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.292, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.209, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.304, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.39, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.39, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.292, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.221, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.221, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.753, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.753, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.663, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.663, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.449, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 243}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "91cc336d3a7f4359a31277a2f9d894e1", "name": "India 2021 local (overnight india-tamil-nadu-2021-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Tamil_Nadu/Tamil_Nadu_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"DMK": "DMK", "PMK": "PMK", "NTK": "NTK", "DMDK": "DMDK", "NOTA": "NOTA", "BSP": "BSP", "IJK": "IJK", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "Independent_1_3": "Independent_1_3", "Independent_1_4": "Independent_1_4", "Anaithu Makkal Arasiyal Katchi": "Anaithu Makkal Arasiyal Katchi", "Independent_1_5": "Independent_1_5", "INC": "INC", "ADMK": "ADMK", "MNM": "MNM", "AMMK": "AMMK", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "Anna MGR Dravida Makkal Kalgam": "Anna MGR Dravida Makkal Kalgam", "Independent_2_3": "Independent_2_3", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "Independent_3_3": "Independent_3_3", "Independent_3_4": "Independent_3_4", "Independent_3_5": "Independent_3_5", "All India Jananayaka Makkal Kazhagam": "All India Jananayaka Makkal Kazhagam", "Independent_3_6": "Independent_3_6", "Independent_3_7": "Independent_3_7", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "Independent_4_4": "Independent_4_4", "Independent_4_5": "Independent_4_5", "Independent_4_6": "Independent_4_6", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "Independent_5_2": "Independent_5_2", "Independent_5_3": "Independent_5_3", "My India Party": "My India Party", "Independent_5_4": "Independent_5_4", "Independent_5_5": "Independent_5_5", "Independent_5_6": "Independent_5_6", "Independent_5_7": "Independent_5_7", "Tamil Nadu Ilangyar Katchi": "Tamil Nadu Ilangyar Katchi", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "Independent_6_2": "Independent_6_2", "Independent_6_3": "Independent_6_3", "Independent_6_4": "Independent_6_4", "Independent_6_5": "Independent_6_5", "Independent_6_6": "Independent_6_6", "Tamilnadu Makkal Nalvazhvu Periyakkam": "Tamilnadu Makkal Nalvazhvu Periyakkam", "MGR Makkal Katchi": "MGR Makkal Katchi", "Independent_6_7": "Independent_6_7", "Independent_6_8": "Independent_6_8", "Independent_6_9": "Independent_6_9", "Independent_6_10": "Independent_6_10", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "NCP": "NCP", "Independent_7_2": "Independent_7_2", "Independent_7_3": "Independent_7_3", "Independent_7_4": "Independent_7_4", "Independent_7_5": "Independent_7_5", "Independent_7_6": "Independent_7_6", "Independent_7_7": "Independent_7_7", "Independent_7_8": "Independent_7_8", "Bahujan Dravida Party": "Bahujan Dravida Party", "Independent_7_9": "Independent_7_9", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "Independent_8_3": "Independent_8_3", "Independent_8_4": "Independent_8_4", "Independent_8_5": "Independent_8_5", "Independent_8_6": "Independent_8_6", "Independent_8_7": "Independent_8_7", "Independent_8_8": "Independent_8_8", "Independent_8_9": "Independent_8_9", "Independent_8_10": "Independent_8_10", "Independent_8_11": "Independent_8_11", "Independent_8_12": "Independent_8_12", "Independent_8_13": "Independent_8_13", "Independent_8_14": "Independent_8_14", "Independent_8_15": "Independent_8_15", "Independent_8_16": "Independent_8_16", "Desiya Makkal Sakthi Katchi": "Desiya Makkal Sakthi Katchi", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "Independent_9_2": "Independent_9_2", "Independent_9_3": "Independent_9_3", "SHS": "SHS", "Independent_9_4": "Independent_9_4", "Independent_9_5": "Independent_9_5", "Naadaalum Makkal Katchi": "Naadaalum Makkal Katchi", "Independent_9_6": "Independent_9_6", "Independent_9_7": "Independent_9_7", "Independent_9_8": "Independent_9_8", "Independent_9_9": "Independent_9_9", "Independent_9_10": "Independent_9_10", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "Samata Party": "Samata Party", "Independent_10_3": "Independent_10_3", "Independent_10_4": "Independent_10_4", "Independent_10_5": "Independent_10_5", "Independent_10_6": "Independent_10_6", "Independent_10_7": "Independent_10_7", "Independent_10_8": "Independent_10_8", "Independent_10_9": "Independent_10_9", "Independent_10_10": "Independent_10_10", "Independent_10_11": "Independent_10_11", "Independent_10_12": "Independent_10_12", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "Independent_11_3": "Independent_11_3", "SUCI": "SUCI", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "Independent_11_4": "Independent_11_4", "Makkal Nalvaazhvuk Katchi": "Makkal Nalvaazhvuk Katchi", "Independent_11_5": "Independent_11_5", "United States of India Party": "United States of India Party", "Independent_11_6": "Independent_11_6", "Independent_11_7": "Independent_11_7", "Independent_11_8": "Independent_11_8", "Independent_11_9": "Independent_11_9", "Independent_11_10": "Independent_11_10", "Independent_11_11": "Independent_11_11", "Independent_11_12": "Independent_11_12", "Independent_11_13": "Independent_11_13", "Independent_11_14": "Independent_11_14", "Independent_11_15": "Independent_11_15", "Independent_11_16": "Independent_11_16", "Independent_11_17": "Independent_11_17", "Independent_11_18": "Independent_11_18", "Independent_11_19": "Independent_11_19", "Independent_11_20": "Independent_11_20", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "Independent_12_3": "Independent_12_3", "Independent_12_4": "Independent_12_4", "Independent_12_5": "Independent_12_5", "Independent_12_6": "Independent_12_6", "Independent_12_7": "Independent_12_7", "Independent_12_8": "Independent_12_8", "Independent_12_9": "Independent_12_9", "Independent_12_10": "Independent_12_10", "Independent_12_11": "Independent_12_11", "Independent_12_12": "Independent_12_12", "Independent_12_13": "Independent_12_13", "Independent_12_14": "Independent_12_14", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "New Generation People\u2019s Party": "New Generation People\u2019s Party", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "Independent_13_3": "Independent_13_3", "Independent_13_4": "Independent_13_4", "Thamizhaga Munnetra Congress": "Thamizhaga Munnetra Congress", "Independent_13_5": "Independent_13_5", "Independent_13_6": "Independent_13_6", "Independent_13_7": "Independent_13_7", "Independent_13_8": "Independent_13_8", "Veerath Thiyagi Viswanathadoss Thozhilalarkal Katchi": "Veerath Thiyagi Viswanathadoss Thozhilalarkal Katchi", "National Democratic Party of South India": "National Democratic Party of South India", "Independent_13_9": "Independent_13_9", "Independent_13_10": "Independent_13_10", "Independent_13_11": "Independent_13_11", "Makkalatchi Katchi": "Makkalatchi Katchi", "Independent_13_12": "Independent_13_12", "Independent_13_13": "Independent_13_13", "Independent_13_14": "Independent_13_14", "Independent_13_15": "Independent_13_15", "Independent_13_16": "Independent_13_16", "Independent_13_17": "Independent_13_17", "Independent_13_18": "Independent_13_18", "Independent_13_19": "Independent_13_19", "Independent_13_20": "Independent_13_20", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Valamaana  Tamizhagam   Katchi": "Valamaana  Tamizhagam   Katchi", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "Independent_14_3": "Independent_14_3", "Nam India Naam Indiyar Katchi": "Nam India Naam Indiyar Katchi", "Independent_14_4": "Independent_14_4", "Independent_14_5": "Independent_14_5", "Independent_14_6": "Independent_14_6", "Independent_14_7": "Independent_14_7", "Independent_14_8": "Independent_14_8", "Independent_14_9": "Independent_14_9", "Independent_14_10": "Independent_14_10", "Independent_14_11": "Independent_14_11", "Independent_14_12": "Independent_14_12", "Independent_14_13": "Independent_14_13", "Independent_14_14": "Independent_14_14", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_15_2": "Independent_15_2", "Independent_15_3": "Independent_15_3", "Independent_15_4": "Independent_15_4", "Independent_15_5": "Independent_15_5", "Independent_15_6": "Independent_15_6", "Independent_15_7": "Independent_15_7", "Independent_15_8": "Independent_15_8", "Republican Party of India  (Sivaraj)": "Republican Party of India  (Sivaraj)", "Independent_15_9": "Independent_15_9", "Independent_15_10": "Independent_15_10", "Independent_15_11": "Independent_15_11", "Independent_15_12": "Independent_15_12", "Independent_15_13": "Independent_15_13", "Independent_15_14": "Independent_15_14", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_16_2": "Independent_16_2", "Independent_16_3": "Independent_16_3", "Independent_16_4": "Independent_16_4", "LJP": "LJP", "Independent_16_5": "Independent_16_5", "Independent_16_6": "Independent_16_6", "Independent_16_7": "Independent_16_7", "Independent_16_8": "Independent_16_8", "Independent_16_9": "Independent_16_9", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Tipu Sultan Party": "Tipu Sultan Party", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "Independent_17_3": "Independent_17_3", "Independent_17_4": "Independent_17_4", "Independent_17_5": "Independent_17_5", "Independent_17_6": "Independent_17_6", "Independent_17_7": "Independent_17_7", "Independent_17_8": "Independent_17_8", "Independent_17_9": "Independent_17_9", "Independent_17_10": "Independent_17_10", "Independent_17_11": "Independent_17_11", "Independent_17_12": "Independent_17_12", "Independent_17_13": "Independent_17_13", "Independent_17_14": "Independent_17_14", "Independent_17_15": "Independent_17_15", "Independent_17_16": "Independent_17_16", "Independent_17_17": "Independent_17_17", "Independent_17_18": "Independent_17_18", "BJP": "BJP", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_18_3": "Independent_18_3", "Independent_18_4": "Independent_18_4", "Independent_18_5": "Independent_18_5", "Independent_18_6": "Independent_18_6", "Independent_18_7": "Independent_18_7", "Independent_18_8": "Independent_18_8", "Independent_18_9": "Independent_18_9", "Independent_18_10": "Independent_18_10", "Independent_18_11": "Independent_18_11", "Independent_18_12": "Independent_18_12", "Independent_18_13": "Independent_18_13", "Independent_18_14": "Independent_18_14", "Independent_18_15": "Independent_18_15", "Independent_18_16": "Independent_18_16", "Independent_18_17": "Independent_18_17", "Independent_18_18": "Independent_18_18", "Independent_18_19": "Independent_18_19", "Independent_18_20": "Independent_18_20", "Independent_18_21": "Independent_18_21", "Independent_18_22": "Independent_18_22", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "Independent_19_3": "Independent_19_3", "Independent_19_4": "Independent_19_4", "Independent_19_5": "Independent_19_5", "Independent_19_6": "Independent_19_6", "Independent_19_7": "Independent_19_7", "Independent_19_8": "Independent_19_8", "Independent_19_9": "Independent_19_9", "Independent_19_10": "Independent_19_10", "Independent_19_11": "Independent_19_11", "Independent_19_12": "Independent_19_12", "Independent_19_13": "Independent_19_13", "Independent_19_14": "Independent_19_14", "Independent_19_15": "Independent_19_15", "Independent_19_16": "Independent_19_16", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_20_2": "Independent_20_2", "Independent_20_3": "Independent_20_3", "Independent_20_4": "Independent_20_4", "Independent_20_5": "Independent_20_5", "Independent_20_6": "Independent_20_6", "Independent_20_7": "Independent_20_7", "Independent_20_8": "Independent_20_8", "Independent_20_9": "Independent_20_9", "Independent_20_10": "Independent_20_10", "Independent_20_11": "Independent_20_11", "Independent_20_12": "Independent_20_12", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_21_2": "Independent_21_2", "Independent_21_3": "Independent_21_3", "Independent_21_4": "Independent_21_4", "Independent_21_5": "Independent_21_5", "Independent_21_6": "Independent_21_6", "Independent_21_7": "Independent_21_7", "Independent_21_8": "Independent_21_8", "Independent_21_9": "Independent_21_9", "Independent_21_10": "Independent_21_10", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_22_2": "Independent_22_2", "Independent_22_3": "Independent_22_3", "Independent_22_4": "Independent_22_4", "Independent_22_5": "Independent_22_5", "Independent_22_6": "Independent_22_6", "Independent_22_7": "Independent_22_7", "RJD": "RJD", "Independent_22_8": "Independent_22_8", "Independent_22_9": "Independent_22_9", "Tamizhaga Murpokku Makkal Katchi": "Tamizhaga Murpokku Makkal Katchi", "Independent_22_10": "Independent_22_10", "Independent_22_11": "Independent_22_11", "Independent_22_12": "Independent_22_12", "Independent_22_13": "Independent_22_13", "Independent_22_14": "Independent_22_14", "Independent_22_15": "Independent_22_15", "Independent_22_16": "Independent_22_16", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_23_2": "Independent_23_2", "Independent_23_3": "Independent_23_3", "Independent_23_4": "Independent_23_4", "Independent_23_5": "Independent_23_5", "Independent_23_6": "Independent_23_6", "Independent_23_7": "Independent_23_7", "Independent_23_8": "Independent_23_8", "Independent_23_9": "Independent_23_9", "Independent_23_10": "Independent_23_10", "Independent_23_11": "Independent_23_11", "Independent_23_12": "Independent_23_12", "Independent_23_13": "Independent_23_13", "Independent_23_14": "Independent_23_14", "Independent_23_15": "Independent_23_15", "Independent_23_16": "Independent_23_16", "Independent_23_17": "Independent_23_17", "Independent_23_18": "Independent_23_18", "Independent_23_19": "Independent_23_19", "Independent_23_20": "Independent_23_20", "Independent_23_21": "Independent_23_21", "Independent_23_22": "Independent_23_22", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "Independent_24_2": "Independent_24_2", "Independent_24_3": "Independent_24_3", "Mahathma Makkal Munnetra Kazhakam": "Mahathma Makkal Munnetra Kazhakam", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "Independent_25_4": "Independent_25_4", "Jebamani Janata": "Jebamani Janata", "Independent_25_5": "Independent_25_5", "Independent_25_6": "Independent_25_6", "Independent_25_7": "Independent_25_7", "Independent_25_8": "Independent_25_8", "Independent_25_9": "Independent_25_9", "Independent_25_10": "Independent_25_10", "Independent_25_11": "Independent_25_11", "Independent_25_12": "Independent_25_12", "Independent_25_13": "Independent_25_13", "Independent_25_14": "Independent_25_14", "Independent_25_15": "Independent_25_15", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "Independent_26_3": "Independent_26_3", "Independent_26_4": "Independent_26_4", "Independent_26_5": "Independent_26_5", "Independent_26_6": "Independent_26_6", "Independent_26_7": "Independent_26_7", "Independent_26_8": "Independent_26_8", "Independent_26_9": "Independent_26_9", "Independent_26_10": "Independent_26_10", "Independent_26_11": "Independent_26_11", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "Independent_27_3": "Independent_27_3", "Independent_27_4": "Independent_27_4", "Independent_27_5": "Independent_27_5", "Independent_27_6": "Independent_27_6", "Anna MGR Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam": "Anna MGR Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "Independent_27_7": "Independent_27_7", "Independent_27_8": "Independent_27_8", "Independent_27_9": "Independent_27_9", "Independent_27_10": "Independent_27_10", "Independent_27_11": "Independent_27_11", "Independent_27_12": "Independent_27_12", "Independent_27_13": "Independent_27_13", "Independent_27_14": "Independent_27_14", "Independent_27_15": "Independent_27_15", "Independent_27_16": "Independent_27_16", "Independent_27_17": "Independent_27_17", "Independent_27_18": "Independent_27_18", "SDPI": "SDPI", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "Independent_28_4": "Independent_28_4", "Independent_28_5": "Independent_28_5", "Independent_28_6": "Independent_28_6", "Independent_28_7": "Independent_28_7", "Independent_28_8": "Independent_28_8", "Independent_28_9": "Independent_28_9", "Independent_28_10": "Independent_28_10", "Bhartiya Manavadhikaar Federal Party": "Bhartiya Manavadhikaar Federal Party", "Independent_28_11": "Independent_28_11", "Independent_28_12": "Independent_28_12", "Independent_28_13": "Independent_28_13", "Independent_28_14": "Independent_28_14", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "Independent_29_4": "Independent_29_4", "Independent_29_5": "Independent_29_5", "Independent_29_6": "Independent_29_6", "Independent_29_7": "Independent_29_7", "Independent_29_8": "Independent_29_8", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "Puthiya Tamilagam": "Puthiya Tamilagam", "Independent_30_3": "Independent_30_3", "Independent_30_4": "Independent_30_4", "Independent_30_5": "Independent_30_5", "Independent_30_6": "Independent_30_6", "Independent_30_7": "Independent_30_7", "Dravida Murpokku Makkal Katchi": "Dravida Murpokku Makkal Katchi", "Independent_30_8": "Independent_30_8", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_31_2": "Independent_31_2", "Independent_31_3": "Independent_31_3", "Independent_31_4": "Independent_31_4", "Independent_31_5": "Independent_31_5", "Independent_31_6": "Independent_31_6", "Independent_31_7": "Independent_31_7", "Independent_31_8": "Independent_31_8", "Independent_31_9": "Independent_31_9", "Independent_31_10": "Independent_31_10", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_32_3": "Independent_32_3", "Independent_32_4": "Independent_32_4", "VCK": "VCK", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "Independent_33_4": "Independent_33_4", "Independent_33_5": "Independent_33_5", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_34_3": "Independent_34_3", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "Desiya Sirupanmayinar Makkal Iyakkam": "Desiya Sirupanmayinar Makkal Iyakkam", "Independent_35_2": "Independent_35_2", "Makkal Munnetra Peravai": "Makkal Munnetra Peravai", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_36_3": "Independent_36_3", "Independent_36_4": "Independent_36_4", "Independent_36_5": "Independent_36_5", "Independent_36_6": "Independent_36_6", "Independent_36_7": "Independent_36_7", "Independent_36_8": "Independent_36_8", "Independent_36_9": "Independent_36_9", "Independent_36_10": "Independent_36_10", "Independent_36_11": "Independent_36_11", "Independent_36_12": "Independent_36_12", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "Independent_37_3": "Independent_37_3", "Independent_37_4": "Independent_37_4", "Independent_37_5": "Independent_37_5", "Independent_37_6": "Independent_37_6", "Independent_37_7": "Independent_37_7", "Independent_37_8": "Independent_37_8", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_38_3": "Independent_38_3", "Independent_38_4": "Independent_38_4", "Independent_38_5": "Independent_38_5", "Independent_38_6": "Independent_38_6", "Independent_38_7": "Independent_38_7", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_39_2": "Independent_39_2", "Independent_39_3": "Independent_39_3", "Independent_39_4": "Independent_39_4", "Independent_39_5": "Independent_39_5", "Independent_39_6": "Independent_39_6", "Independent_39_7": "Independent_39_7", "Independent_39_8": "Independent_39_8", "Independent_39_9": "Independent_39_9", "Independent_39_10": "Independent_39_10", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_40_3": "Independent_40_3", "Independent_40_4": "Independent_40_4", "Independent_40_5": "Independent_40_5", "Independent_40_6": "Independent_40_6", "Independent_40_7": "Independent_40_7", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "Independent_41_3": "Independent_41_3", "Independent_41_4": "Independent_41_4", "Independent_41_5": "Independent_41_5", "Independent_41_6": "Independent_41_6", "Independent_41_7": "Independent_41_7", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_42_2": "Independent_42_2", "Independent_42_3": "Independent_42_3", "Independent_42_4": "Independent_42_4", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_43_2": "Independent_43_2", "Independent_43_3": "Independent_43_3", "Independent_43_4": "Independent_43_4", "Kamarajar Deseeya Congress": "Kamarajar Deseeya Congress", "Independent_43_5": "Independent_43_5", "Independent_43_6": "Independent_43_6", "Independent_43_7": "Independent_43_7", "Independent_43_8": "Independent_43_8", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "Independent_44_3": "Independent_44_3", "Independent_44_4": "Independent_44_4", "Independent_44_5": "Independent_44_5", "Independent_44_6": "Independent_44_6", "Independent_44_7": "Independent_44_7", "Independent_44_8": "Independent_44_8", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_45_2": "Independent_45_2", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "Independent_46_3": "Independent_46_3", "Independent_46_4": "Independent_46_4", "All Pensioner\u2019s Party": "All Pensioner\u2019s Party", "Independent_46_5": "Independent_46_5", "Independent_46_6": "Independent_46_6", "Independent_46_7": "Independent_46_7", "IUML": "IUML", "AIMIM": "AIMIM", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha": "Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "Independent_47_3": "Independent_47_3", "Independent_47_4": "Independent_47_4", "All India Youth Development Party": "All India Youth Development Party", "Independent_47_5": "Independent_47_5", "Anaithu Makkal Puratchi Katchi": "Anaithu Makkal Puratchi Katchi", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_48_2": "Independent_48_2", "Independent_48_3": "Independent_48_3", "Rashtriya Ulama Council": "Rashtriya Ulama Council", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "All India Uzhavargal Uzhaippalargal Katchi": "All India Uzhavargal Uzhaippalargal Katchi", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "Independent_49_3": "Independent_49_3", "Independent_49_4": "Independent_49_4", "Independent_49_5": "Independent_49_5", "Independent_49_6": "Independent_49_6", "Independent_49_7": "Independent_49_7", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Makkal Nala Kazhagam": "Makkal Nala Kazhagam", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_50_3": "Independent_50_3", "Independent_50_4": "Independent_50_4", "Independent_50_5": "Independent_50_5", "Independent_50_6": "Independent_50_6", "Samaniya Makkal Nala Katchi": "Samaniya Makkal Nala Katchi", "Independent_50_7": "Independent_50_7", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Anna Puratchi Thalaivar Amma Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam": "Anna Puratchi Thalaivar Amma Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "Independent_51_3": "Independent_51_3", "Independent_51_4": "Independent_51_4", "Independent_51_5": "Independent_51_5", "NPP": "NPP", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "Independent_52_3": "Independent_52_3", "Independent_52_4": "Independent_52_4", "Independent_52_5": "Independent_52_5", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "Independent_53_2": "Independent_53_2", "Independent_53_3": "Independent_53_3", "Independent_53_4": "Independent_53_4", "Independent_53_5": "Independent_53_5", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_54_3": "Independent_54_3", "Independent_54_4": "Independent_54_4", "Independent_54_5": "Independent_54_5", "Independent_54_6": "Independent_54_6", "Independent_54_7": "Independent_54_7", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_55_2": "Independent_55_2", "Independent_55_3": "Independent_55_3", "Independent_55_4": "Independent_55_4", "Independent_55_5": "Independent_55_5", "Independent_55_6": "Independent_55_6", "Independent_55_7": "Independent_55_7", "Independent_55_8": "Independent_55_8", "Independent_55_9": "Independent_55_9", "CPI": "CPI", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_56_2": "Independent_56_2", "Independent_56_3": "Independent_56_3", "Independent_56_4": "Independent_56_4", "SP": "SP", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_57_2": "Independent_57_2", "Independent_57_3": "Independent_57_3", "Independent_57_4": "Independent_57_4", "Independent_57_5": "Independent_57_5", "Independent_57_6": "Independent_57_6", "Independent_58_1": "Independent_58_1", "Independent_58_2": "Independent_58_2", "Independent_58_3": "Independent_58_3", "Independent_58_4": "Independent_58_4", "Independent_58_5": "Independent_58_5", "Independent_58_6": "Independent_58_6", "Independent_58_7": "Independent_58_7", "Independent_58_8": "Independent_58_8", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_59_2": "Independent_59_2", "Independent_59_3": "Independent_59_3", "Independent_59_4": "Independent_59_4", "Independent_59_5": "Independent_59_5", "Independent_59_6": "Independent_59_6", "Dhesiya Makkal Kazhagam": "Dhesiya Makkal Kazhagam", "Independent_59_7": "Independent_59_7", "Independent_59_8": "Independent_59_8", "Independent_59_9": "Independent_59_9", "Independent_59_10": "Independent_59_10", "Independent_59_11": "Independent_59_11", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "Independent_60_3": "Independent_60_3", "Independent_60_4": "Independent_60_4", "Independent_60_5": "Independent_60_5", "Independent_60_6": "Independent_60_6", "Independent_60_7": "Independent_60_7", "Independent_60_8": "Independent_60_8", "CPM": "CPM", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "Independent_61_3": "Independent_61_3", "Independent_61_4": "Independent_61_4", "Independent_61_5": "Independent_61_5", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_62_3": "Independent_62_3", "Independent_62_4": "Independent_62_4", "Independent_62_5": "Independent_62_5", "Independent_62_6": "Independent_62_6", "Independent_62_7": "Independent_62_7", "Independent_62_8": "Independent_62_8", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "Independent_63_3": "Independent_63_3", "Independent_63_4": "Independent_63_4", "Independent_63_5": "Independent_63_5", "Independent_63_6": "Independent_63_6", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_64_2": "Independent_64_2", "Independent_64_3": "Independent_64_3", "Independent_64_4": "Independent_64_4", "Independent_64_5": "Independent_64_5", "Independent_64_6": "Independent_64_6", "Independent_64_7": "Independent_64_7", "Independent_64_8": "Independent_64_8", "Independent_64_9": "Independent_64_9", "Independent_64_10": "Independent_64_10", "Independent_64_11": "Independent_64_11", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_65_2": "Independent_65_2", "Independent_65_3": "Independent_65_3", "Independent_65_4": "Independent_65_4", "Independent_65_5": "Independent_65_5", "Independent_65_6": "Independent_65_6", "Independent_65_7": "Independent_65_7", "Anna Dravidar Kazhagam": "Anna Dravidar Kazhagam", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_66_2": "Independent_66_2", "Independent_66_3": "Independent_66_3", "Independent_66_4": "Independent_66_4", "Independent_66_5": "Independent_66_5", "Independent_66_6": "Independent_66_6", "Independent_66_7": "Independent_66_7", "Independent_66_8": "Independent_66_8", "Independent_66_9": "Independent_66_9", "Independent_67_1": "Independent_67_1", "Independent_67_2": "Independent_67_2", "Independent_67_3": "Independent_67_3", "Independent_67_4": "Independent_67_4", "Independent_67_5": "Independent_67_5", "Independent_67_6": "Independent_67_6", "Independent_67_7": "Independent_67_7", "Independent_67_8": "Independent_67_8", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "Independent_68_3": "Independent_68_3", "Independent_68_4": "Independent_68_4", "Ganasangam Party of India": "Ganasangam Party of India", "Anaithindia Samudaya Munnetra Kazhagam": "Anaithindia Samudaya Munnetra Kazhagam", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_69_3": "Independent_69_3", "Independent_69_4": "Independent_69_4", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "Independent_70_2": "Independent_70_2", "Independent_70_3": "Independent_70_3", "Independent_70_4": "Independent_70_4", "Independent_70_5": "Independent_70_5", "Independent_70_6": "Independent_70_6", "Independent_71_1": "Independent_71_1", "Independent_71_2": "Independent_71_2", "Independent_71_3": "Independent_71_3", "Independent_71_4": "Independent_71_4", "Independent_71_5": "Independent_71_5", "Independent_71_6": "Independent_71_6", "Independent_71_7": "Independent_71_7", "Independent_71_8": "Independent_71_8", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_72_2": "Independent_72_2", "All  India  Pattali  Munnetra Katchi": "All  India  Pattali  Munnetra Katchi", "Independent_72_3": "Independent_72_3", "Independent_72_4": "Independent_72_4", "MAKKAL SAKTHI KATCHI": "MAKKAL SAKTHI KATCHI", "Independent_72_5": "Independent_72_5", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_74_2": "Independent_74_2", "Independent_74_3": "Independent_74_3", "Independent_74_4": "Independent_74_4", "Independent_74_5": "Independent_74_5", "Independent_74_6": "Independent_74_6", "Independent_74_7": "Independent_74_7", "Independent_74_8": "Independent_74_8", "Independent_74_9": "Independent_74_9", "Independent_74_10": "Independent_74_10", "Independent_74_11": "Independent_74_11", "Independent_74_12": "Independent_74_12", "Independent_74_13": "Independent_74_13", "Independent_74_14": "Independent_74_14", "Independent_74_15": "Independent_74_15", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_75_2": "Independent_75_2", "Independent_75_3": "Independent_75_3", "Independent_75_4": "Independent_75_4", "Independent_75_5": "Independent_75_5", "Independent_75_6": "Independent_75_6", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_76_3": "Independent_76_3", "Independent_76_4": "Independent_76_4", "Independent_76_5": "Independent_76_5", "Independent_76_6": "Independent_76_6", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_77_2": "Independent_77_2", "Independent_77_3": "Independent_77_3", "Indhia Kudiarasu Katchi": "Indhia Kudiarasu Katchi", "Independent_77_4": "Independent_77_4", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_78_2": "Independent_78_2", "Independent_78_3": "Independent_78_3", "Independent_78_4": "Independent_78_4", "Independent_78_5": "Independent_78_5", "Independent_79_1": "Independent_79_1", "Independent_79_2": "Independent_79_2", "Independent_79_3": "Independent_79_3", "Independent_79_4": "Independent_79_4", "Independent_79_5": "Independent_79_5", "Independent_79_6": "Independent_79_6", "Independent_79_7": "Independent_79_7", "Independent_79_8": "Independent_79_8", "Independent_79_9": "Independent_79_9", "Independent_79_10": "Independent_79_10", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_80_2": "Independent_80_2", "Independent_80_3": "Independent_80_3", "Independent_80_4": "Independent_80_4", "Independent_80_5": "Independent_80_5", "Independent_80_6": "Independent_80_6", "Independent_80_7": "Independent_80_7", "Independent_80_8": "Independent_80_8", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "Independent_81_2": "Independent_81_2", "Independent_81_3": "Independent_81_3", "Independent_81_4": "Independent_81_4", "Independent_82_1": "Independent_82_1", "Ambedkarite Party of India": "Ambedkarite Party of India", "Independent_82_2": "Independent_82_2", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_83_2": "Independent_83_2", "Independent_83_3": "Independent_83_3", "Independent_83_4": "Independent_83_4", "Independent_83_5": "Independent_83_5", "Independent_83_6": "Independent_83_6", "Independent_83_7": "Independent_83_7", "Independent_84_1": "Independent_84_1", "Independent_84_2": "Independent_84_2", "Independent_84_3": "Independent_84_3", "Independent_84_4": "Independent_84_4", "Independent_84_5": "Independent_84_5", "Independent_84_6": "Independent_84_6", "Independent_84_7": "Independent_84_7", "Independent_85_1": "Independent_85_1", "Independent_85_2": "Independent_85_2", "Independent_85_3": "Independent_85_3", "Independent_85_4": "Independent_85_4", "Independent_85_5": "Independent_85_5", "Independent_85_6": "Independent_85_6", "Independent_86_1": "Independent_86_1", "Independent_86_2": "Independent_86_2", "Independent_86_3": "Independent_86_3", "Independent_86_4": "Independent_86_4", "Independent_86_5": "Independent_86_5", "Independent_86_6": "Independent_86_6", "Independent_86_7": "Independent_86_7", "Independent_86_8": "Independent_86_8", "Independent_86_9": "Independent_86_9", "Independent_86_10": "Independent_86_10", "Independent_86_11": "Independent_86_11", "Independent_86_12": "Independent_86_12", "Independent_86_13": "Independent_86_13", "Independent_86_14": "Independent_86_14", "Independent_86_15": "Independent_86_15", "Independent_86_16": "Independent_86_16", "Independent_86_17": "Independent_86_17", "Independent_87_1": "Independent_87_1", "Tamilaga Makkal Thannurimai Katchi": "Tamilaga Makkal Thannurimai Katchi", "Independent_87_2": "Independent_87_2", "Independent_87_3": "Independent_87_3", "Independent_87_4": "Independent_87_4", "Independent_87_5": "Independent_87_5", "Independent_87_6": "Independent_87_6", "Independent_87_7": "Independent_87_7", "Independent_87_8": "Independent_87_8", "Independent_87_9": "Independent_87_9", "Independent_87_10": "Independent_87_10", "Independent_87_11": "Independent_87_11", "Independent_87_12": "Independent_87_12", "Independent_87_13": "Independent_87_13", "Independent_87_14": "Independent_87_14", "Independent_87_15": "Independent_87_15", "Independent_88_1": "Independent_88_1", "Independent_88_2": "Independent_88_2", "Independent_88_3": "Independent_88_3", "Independent_88_4": "Independent_88_4", "Independent_88_5": "Independent_88_5", "Independent_88_6": "Independent_88_6", "Independent_88_7": "Independent_88_7", "Independent_88_8": "Independent_88_8", "Independent_88_9": "Independent_88_9", "Independent_88_10": "Independent_88_10", "Independent_88_11": "Independent_88_11", "Independent_88_12": "Independent_88_12", "Independent_88_13": "Independent_88_13", "Independent_88_14": "Independent_88_14", "Independent_88_15": "Independent_88_15", "Independent_88_16": "Independent_88_16", "Independent_88_17": "Independent_88_17", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_89_2": "Independent_89_2", "Independent_89_3": "Independent_89_3", "Independent_89_4": "Independent_89_4", "Independent_89_5": "Independent_89_5", "Independent_89_6": "Independent_89_6", "Independent_89_7": "Independent_89_7", "Independent_89_8": "Independent_89_8", "Independent_89_9": "Independent_89_9", "Independent_90_1": "Independent_90_1", "Independent_90_2": "Independent_90_2", "Independent_90_3": "Independent_90_3", "Independent_90_4": "Independent_90_4", "Independent_90_5": "Independent_90_5", "Independent_90_6": "Independent_90_6", "Independent_90_7": "Independent_90_7", "Independent_90_8": "Independent_90_8", "Independent_90_9": "Independent_90_9", "Independent_90_10": "Independent_90_10", "Independent_90_11": "Independent_90_11", "Independent_90_12": "Independent_90_12", "Independent_90_13": "Independent_90_13", "Independent_91_1": "Independent_91_1", "Independent_91_2": "Independent_91_2", "Independent_91_3": "Independent_91_3", "Independent_91_4": "Independent_91_4", "Independent_91_5": "Independent_91_5", "Independent_91_6": "Independent_91_6", "Independent_91_7": "Independent_91_7", "Independent_91_8": "Independent_91_8", "Independent_91_9": "Independent_91_9", "Independent_92_1": "Independent_92_1", "Independent_92_2": "Independent_92_2", "Independent_92_3": "Independent_92_3", "Independent_92_4": "Independent_92_4", "Independent_92_5": "Independent_92_5", "Independent_92_6": "Independent_92_6", "Independent_93_1": "Independent_93_1", "Independent_93_2": "Independent_93_2", "Independent_93_3": "Independent_93_3", "Independent_93_4": "Independent_93_4", "Independent_93_5": "Independent_93_5", "Independent_93_6": "Independent_93_6", "Independent_93_7": "Independent_93_7", "Independent_93_8": "Independent_93_8", "Independent_93_9": "Independent_93_9", "Independent_93_10": "Independent_93_10", "Ahimsa Socialist Party": "Ahimsa Socialist Party", "Independent_94_1": "Independent_94_1", "Independent_94_2": "Independent_94_2", "Independent_94_3": "Independent_94_3", "Independent_94_4": "Independent_94_4", "Independent_94_5": "Independent_94_5", "Manitha Urimaigal Kalaagam": "Manitha Urimaigal Kalaagam", "Independent_94_6": "Independent_94_6", "Independent_94_7": "Independent_94_7", "Independent_94_8": "Independent_94_8", "Independent_94_9": "Independent_94_9", "Independent_94_10": "Independent_94_10", "Independent_94_11": "Independent_94_11", "Independent_95_1": "Independent_95_1", "Independent_95_2": "Independent_95_2", "Independent_95_3": "Independent_95_3", "Independent_95_4": "Independent_95_4", "Independent_95_5": "Independent_95_5", "Independent_95_6": "Independent_95_6", "Independent_95_7": "Independent_95_7", "Independent_95_8": "Independent_95_8", "Independent_95_9": "Independent_95_9", "Independent_95_10": "Independent_95_10", "Independent_95_11": "Independent_95_11", "Independent_95_12": "Independent_95_12", "Independent_95_13": "Independent_95_13", "Independent_95_14": "Independent_95_14", "Independent_95_15": "Independent_95_15", "Independent_95_16": "Independent_95_16", "Independent_95_17": "Independent_95_17", "Independent_95_18": "Independent_95_18", "Independent_95_19": "Independent_95_19", "Independent_96_1": "Independent_96_1", "Independent_96_2": "Independent_96_2", "Independent_96_3": "Independent_96_3", "Independent_96_4": "Independent_96_4", "Independent_96_5": "Independent_96_5", "Independent_96_6": "Independent_96_6", "Independent_96_7": "Independent_96_7", "Independent_96_8": "Independent_96_8", "Namathu Kongu Munnetra Kalagam": "Namathu Kongu Munnetra Kalagam", "Independent_96_9": "Independent_96_9", "Independent_96_10": "Independent_96_10", "Independent_96_11": "Independent_96_11", "Independent_96_12": "Independent_96_12", "Independent_96_13": "Independent_96_13", "Independent_96_14": "Independent_96_14", "Independent_96_15": "Independent_96_15", "Independent_96_16": "Independent_96_16", "Independent_96_17": "Independent_96_17", "Independent_96_18": "Independent_96_18", "Independent_97_1": "Independent_97_1", "Independent_97_2": "Independent_97_2", "Independent_97_3": "Independent_97_3", "Independent_97_4": "Independent_97_4", "Independent_97_5": "Independent_97_5", "Independent_97_6": "Independent_97_6", "Independent_97_7": "Independent_97_7", "Independent_97_8": "Independent_97_8", "Independent_97_9": "Independent_97_9", "Independent_97_10": "Independent_97_10", "Independent_97_11": "Independent_97_11", "Independent_97_12": "Independent_97_12", "Independent_97_13": "Independent_97_13", "Independent_97_14": "Independent_97_14", "Independent_97_15": "Independent_97_15", "Independent_97_16": "Independent_97_16", "Independent_97_17": "Independent_97_17", "Independent_97_18": "Independent_97_18", "Independent_97_19": "Independent_97_19", "Independent_97_20": "Independent_97_20", "Independent_97_21": "Independent_97_21", "Independent_98_1": "Independent_98_1", "Independent_98_2": "Independent_98_2", "Independent_98_3": "Independent_98_3", "Makkal Thilagam Munnetra Kazhagam,": "Makkal Thilagam Munnetra Kazhagam,", "Independent_98_4": "Independent_98_4", "Independent_98_5": "Independent_98_5", "Independent_99_1": "Independent_99_1", "Independent_99_2": "Independent_99_2", "Independent_99_3": "Independent_99_3", "Independent_99_4": "Independent_99_4", "Independent_99_5": "Independent_99_5", "India Dravida Makkal Munnetra Katchi": "India Dravida Makkal Munnetra Katchi", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_100_2": "Independent_100_2", "Independent_100_3": "Independent_100_3", "Independent_100_4": "Independent_100_4", "Independent_100_5": "Independent_100_5", "Independent_101_1": "Independent_101_1", "Independent_101_2": "Independent_101_2", "Independent_101_3": "Independent_101_3", "Independent_101_4": "Independent_101_4", "Independent_101_5": "Independent_101_5", "Independent_101_6": "Independent_101_6", "Independent_102_1": "Independent_102_1", "Independent_102_2": "Independent_102_2", "Independent_102_3": "Independent_102_3", "Independent_102_4": "Independent_102_4", "Independent_102_5": "Independent_102_5", "Independent_102_6": "Independent_102_6", "Independent_102_7": "Independent_102_7", "Independent_102_8": "Independent_102_8", "Independent_102_9": "Independent_102_9", "Independent_102_10": "Independent_102_10", "Independent_102_11": "Independent_102_11", "Independent_102_12": "Independent_102_12", "Independent_102_13": "Independent_102_13", "Independent_102_14": "Independent_102_14", "Independent_102_15": "Independent_102_15", "Independent_102_16": "Independent_102_16", "Independent_102_17": "Independent_102_17", "Independent_102_18": "Independent_102_18", "Independent_102_19": "Independent_102_19", "Independent_102_20": "Independent_102_20", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_103_2": "Independent_103_2", "Independent_103_3": "Independent_103_3", "Independent_103_4": "Independent_103_4", "Independent_103_5": "Independent_103_5", "Independent_103_6": "Independent_103_6", "Independent_103_7": "Independent_103_7", "Independent_103_8": "Independent_103_8", "Independent_103_9": "Independent_103_9", "Independent_103_10": "Independent_103_10", "Independent_103_11": "Independent_103_11", "Independent_103_12": "Independent_103_12", "Independent_103_13": "Independent_103_13", "Independent_103_14": "Independent_103_14", "Independent_103_15": "Independent_103_15", "Independent_104_1": "Independent_104_1", "Kongu  Desa  Marumalarchi  Makkal  Katchi": "Kongu  Desa  Marumalarchi  Makkal  Katchi", "Independent_104_2": "Independent_104_2", "Independent_104_3": "Independent_104_3", "Independent_104_4": "Independent_104_4", "Independent_104_5": "Independent_104_5", "Independent_104_6": "Independent_104_6", "Independent_105_1": "Independent_105_1", "Independent_105_2": "Independent_105_2", "Independent_105_3": "Independent_105_3", "Independent_105_4": "Independent_105_4", "Independent_105_5": "Independent_105_5", "Independent_105_6": "Independent_105_6", "Independent_105_7": "Independent_105_7", "Independent_105_8": "Independent_105_8", "Independent_105_9": "Independent_105_9", "Independent_105_10": "Independent_105_10", "Independent_105_11": "Independent_105_11", "Independent_106_1": "Independent_106_1", "Independent_106_2": "Independent_106_2", "Independent_106_3": "Independent_106_3", "Independent_106_4": "Independent_106_4", "Independent_106_5": "Independent_106_5", "Independent_106_6": "Independent_106_6", "Independent_106_7": "Independent_106_7", "Independent_106_8": "Independent_106_8", "Independent_106_9": "Independent_106_9", "Independent_106_10": "Independent_106_10", "Independent_106_11": "Independent_106_11", "Independent_106_12": "Independent_106_12", "Independent_108_1": "Independent_108_1", "Independent_108_2": "Independent_108_2", "Independent_108_3": "Independent_108_3", "Independent_108_4": "Independent_108_4", "Independent_109_1": "Independent_109_1", "Independent_110_1": "Independent_110_1", "AITC": "AITC", "Independent_110_2": "Independent_110_2", "Independent_110_3": "Independent_110_3", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "Independent_111_2": "Independent_111_2", "Independent_111_3": "Independent_111_3", "Independent_111_4": "Independent_111_4", "Independent_111_5": "Independent_111_5", "Independent_112_1": "Independent_112_1", "Independent_112_2": "Independent_112_2", "Independent_112_3": "Independent_112_3", "Independent_112_4": "Independent_112_4", "Independent_112_5": "Independent_112_5", "Independent_113_1": "Independent_113_1", "Independent_113_2": "Independent_113_2", "Independent_113_3": "Independent_113_3", "Independent_113_4": "Independent_113_4", "Ezhuchi Tamilargal Munnetra Kazhagam": "Ezhuchi Tamilargal Munnetra Kazhagam", "Independent_113_5": "Independent_113_5", "Independent_113_6": "Independent_113_6", "Independent_114_1": "Independent_114_1", "Independent_114_2": "Independent_114_2", "Independent_114_3": "Independent_114_3", "Independent_114_4": "Independent_114_4", "Independent_114_5": "Independent_114_5", "Independent_114_6": "Independent_114_6", "Independent_114_7": "Independent_114_7", "Independent_114_8": "Independent_114_8", "Independent_114_9": "Independent_114_9", "Independent_114_10": "Independent_114_10", "Independent_114_11": "Independent_114_11", "Independent_114_12": "Independent_114_12", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_115_2": "Independent_115_2", "Independent_115_3": "Independent_115_3", "Independent_115_4": "Independent_115_4", "Independent_115_5": "Independent_115_5", "Independent_115_6": "Independent_115_6", "Independent_115_7": "Independent_115_7", "Independent_115_8": "Independent_115_8", "Independent_115_9": "Independent_115_9", "Independent_115_10": "Independent_115_10", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "Independent_116_2": "Independent_116_2", "Independent_116_3": "Independent_116_3", "Independent_116_4": "Independent_116_4", "Independent_116_5": "Independent_116_5", "Independent_116_6": "Independent_116_6", "Independent_116_7": "Independent_116_7", "Independent_116_8": "Independent_116_8", "Independent_117_1": "Independent_117_1", "Independent_117_2": "Independent_117_2", "Independent_117_3": "Independent_117_3", "Independent_117_4": "Independent_117_4", "Independent_117_5": "Independent_117_5", "Independent_118_1": "Independent_118_1", "Independent_118_2": "Independent_118_2", "Independent_118_3": "Independent_118_3", "Independent_118_4": "Independent_118_4", "Independent_118_5": "Independent_118_5", "Independent_118_6": "Independent_118_6", "Independent_118_7": "Independent_118_7", "Independent_118_8": "Independent_118_8", "Independent_118_9": "Independent_118_9", "Independent_118_10": "Independent_118_10", "Independent_118_11": "Independent_118_11", "Independent_119_1": "Independent_119_1", "Independent_119_2": "Independent_119_2", "Independent_119_3": "Independent_119_3", "Independent_119_4": "Independent_119_4", "Independent_120_1": "Independent_120_1", "Independent_120_2": "Independent_120_2", "Independent_120_3": "Independent_120_3", "Independent_120_4": "Independent_120_4", "Independent_120_5": "Independent_120_5", "Independent_120_6": "Independent_120_6", "Hindustan Janta Party": "Hindustan Janta Party", "Independent_120_7": "Independent_120_7", "Makkal Sananayaga Kudiyarasu Katchi,": "Makkal Sananayaga Kudiyarasu Katchi,", "Independent_120_8": "Independent_120_8", "Independent_120_9": "Independent_120_9", "Independent_120_10": "Independent_120_10", "Independent_121_1": "Independent_121_1", "Independent_121_2": "Independent_121_2", "Independent_121_3": "Independent_121_3", "Independent_121_4": "Independent_121_4", "Independent_121_5": "Independent_121_5", "Independent_121_6": "Independent_121_6", "Independent_121_7": "Independent_121_7", "Independent_121_8": "Independent_121_8", "Independent_121_9": "Independent_121_9", "Independent_121_10": "Independent_121_10", "Independent_121_11": "Independent_121_11", "Independent_121_12": "Independent_121_12", "Independent_121_13": "Independent_121_13", "Independent_122_1": "Independent_122_1", "Independent_122_2": "Independent_122_2", "Independent_122_3": "Independent_122_3", "Independent_122_4": "Independent_122_4", "Independent_122_5": "Independent_122_5", "Independent_122_6": "Independent_122_6", "Independent_123_1": "Independent_123_1", "Independent_123_2": "Independent_123_2", "Independent_124_1": "Independent_124_1", "Independent_125_1": "Independent_125_1", "Independent_125_2": "Independent_125_2", "Independent_125_3": "Independent_125_3", "Independent_125_4": "Independent_125_4", "Independent_125_5": "Independent_125_5", "Independent_125_6": "Independent_125_6", "Independent_125_7": "Independent_125_7", "Independent_126_1": "Independent_126_1", "Independent_126_2": "Independent_126_2", "Independent_126_3": "Independent_126_3", "Independent_126_4": "Independent_126_4", "Independent_126_5": "Independent_126_5", "Independent_126_6": "Independent_126_6", "Independent_126_7": "Independent_126_7", "Independent_126_8": "Independent_126_8", "Independent_127_1": "Independent_127_1", "Independent_127_2": "Independent_127_2", "Independent_127_3": "Independent_127_3", "Independent_127_4": "Independent_127_4", "Independent_127_5": "Independent_127_5", "Independent_127_6": "Independent_127_6", "Independent_127_7": "Independent_127_7", "Independent_127_8": "Independent_127_8", "Independent_127_9": "Independent_127_9", "Independent_127_10": "Independent_127_10", "Independent_127_11": "Independent_127_11", "Independent_127_12": "Independent_127_12", "Independent_127_13": "Independent_127_13", "Independent_127_14": "Independent_127_14", "Independent_127_15": "Independent_127_15", "Independent_127_16": "Independent_127_16", "Independent_128_1": "Independent_128_1", "Independent_128_2": "Independent_128_2", "Independent_128_3": "Independent_128_3", "Independent_128_4": "Independent_128_4", "Independent_128_5": "Independent_128_5", "Independent_128_6": "Independent_128_6", "Independent_129_1": "Independent_129_1", "Independent_129_2": "Independent_129_2", "Independent_129_3": "Independent_129_3", "Independent_129_4": "Independent_129_4", "Independent_129_5": "Independent_129_5", "Independent_129_6": "Independent_129_6", "Independent_129_7": "Independent_129_7", "Independent_129_8": "Independent_129_8", "Independent_129_9": "Independent_129_9", "Independent_129_10": "Independent_129_10", "Independent_130_1": "Independent_130_1", "Independent_130_2": "Independent_130_2", "Independent_130_3": "Independent_130_3", "Independent_130_4": "Independent_130_4", "Independent_130_5": "Independent_130_5", "Independent_130_6": "Independent_130_6", "Independent_130_7": "Independent_130_7", "Independent_130_8": "Independent_130_8", "Independent_130_9": "Independent_130_9", "Independent_130_10": "Independent_130_10", "Independent_131_1": "Independent_131_1", "Independent_131_2": "Independent_131_2", "Independent_131_3": "Independent_131_3", "Independent_131_4": "Independent_131_4", "Independent_131_5": "Independent_131_5", "Independent_131_6": "Independent_131_6", "Independent_131_7": "Independent_131_7", "Independent_131_8": "Independent_131_8", "Independent_132_1": "Independent_132_1", "Independent_132_2": "Independent_132_2", "Anaithu Makkal Munnetra Kazhagam": "Anaithu Makkal Munnetra Kazhagam", "Independent_132_3": "Independent_132_3", "Independent_132_4": "Independent_132_4", "Independent_132_5": "Independent_132_5", "Independent_132_6": "Independent_132_6", "Independent_132_7": "Independent_132_7", "Independent_132_8": "Independent_132_8", "Independent_132_9": "Independent_132_9", "Independent_132_10": "Independent_132_10", "Independent_133_1": "Independent_133_1", "Independent_133_2": "Independent_133_2", "Independent_133_3": "Independent_133_3", "Independent_133_4": "Independent_133_4", "Independent_133_5": "Independent_133_5", "Independent_133_6": "Independent_133_6", "RSPS": "RSPS", "Independent_133_7": "Independent_133_7", "Independent_133_8": "Independent_133_8", "Independent_133_9": "Independent_133_9", "Independent_133_10": "Independent_133_10", "Independent_133_11": "Independent_133_11", "Independent_134_1": "Independent_134_1", "Independent_134_2": "Independent_134_2", "Independent_134_3": "Independent_134_3", "Independent_134_4": "Independent_134_4", "Independent_134_5": "Independent_134_5", "Independent_134_6": "Independent_134_6", "Independent_134_7": "Independent_134_7", "Independent_134_8": "Independent_134_8", "Independent_134_9": "Independent_134_9", "Independent_134_10": "Independent_134_10", "Independent_134_11": "Independent_134_11", "Independent_134_12": "Independent_134_12", "Independent_134_13": "Independent_134_13", "Independent_134_14": "Independent_134_14", "Independent_134_15": "Independent_134_15", "Independent_134_16": "Independent_134_16", "Independent_134_17": "Independent_134_17", "Independent_134_18": "Independent_134_18", "Independent_134_19": "Independent_134_19", "Independent_134_20": "Independent_134_20", "Independent_134_21": "Independent_134_21", "Independent_134_22": "Independent_134_22", "Independent_134_23": "Independent_134_23", "Independent_134_24": "Independent_134_24", "Independent_134_25": "Independent_134_25", "Independent_134_26": "Independent_134_26", "Independent_134_27": "Independent_134_27", "Independent_134_28": "Independent_134_28", "Independent_134_29": "Independent_134_29", "Independent_134_30": "Independent_134_30", "Independent_134_31": "Independent_134_31", "Independent_134_32": "Independent_134_32", "Independent_135_1": "Independent_135_1", "Independent_135_2": "Independent_135_2", "Independent_135_3": "Independent_135_3", "Independent_135_4": "Independent_135_4", "Independent_135_5": "Independent_135_5", "Independent_135_6": "Independent_135_6", "Independent_135_7": "Independent_135_7", "Independent_135_8": "Independent_135_8", "Independent_135_9": "Independent_135_9", "Independent_135_10": "Independent_135_10", "Independent_135_11": "Independent_135_11", "Independent_135_12": "Independent_135_12", "Independent_135_13": "Independent_135_13", "Independent_135_14": "Independent_135_14", "Independent_135_15": "Independent_135_15", "Independent_135_16": "Independent_135_16", "Independent_135_17": "Independent_135_17", "Independent_135_18": "Independent_135_18", "Independent_135_19": "Independent_135_19", "Independent_135_20": "Independent_135_20", "Independent_135_21": "Independent_135_21", "Independent_135_22": "Independent_135_22", "Independent_135_23": "Independent_135_23", "Independent_135_24": "Independent_135_24", "Independent_135_25": "Independent_135_25", "Independent_135_26": "Independent_135_26", "Independent_135_27": "Independent_135_27", "Independent_135_28": "Independent_135_28", "Independent_135_29": "Independent_135_29", "Independent_135_30": "Independent_135_30", "Independent_135_31": "Independent_135_31", "Independent_135_32": "Independent_135_32", "Independent_135_33": "Independent_135_33", "Independent_135_34": "Independent_135_34", "Independent_135_35": "Independent_135_35", "Independent_135_36": "Independent_135_36", "Independent_135_37": "Independent_135_37", "Independent_135_38": "Independent_135_38", "Independent_135_39": "Independent_135_39", "Independent_135_40": "Independent_135_40", "Independent_135_41": "Independent_135_41", "Independent_135_42": "Independent_135_42", "Independent_135_43": "Independent_135_43", "Independent_135_44": "Independent_135_44", "Independent_135_45": "Independent_135_45", "Independent_135_46": "Independent_135_46", "Independent_135_47": "Independent_135_47", "Independent_135_48": "Independent_135_48", "Independent_135_49": "Independent_135_49", "Independent_135_50": "Independent_135_50", "Independent_135_51": "Independent_135_51", "Independent_135_52": "Independent_135_52", "Independent_135_53": "Independent_135_53", "Independent_135_54": "Independent_135_54", "Independent_135_55": "Independent_135_55", "Independent_135_56": "Independent_135_56", "Independent_135_57": "Independent_135_57", "Independent_135_58": "Independent_135_58", "Independent_135_59": "Independent_135_59", "Independent_135_60": "Independent_135_60", "Independent_135_61": "Independent_135_61", "Independent_135_62": "Independent_135_62", "Independent_135_63": "Independent_135_63", "Independent_135_64": "Independent_135_64", "Independent_135_65": "Independent_135_65", "Independent_135_66": "Independent_135_66", "Independent_135_67": "Independent_135_67", "Independent_135_68": "Independent_135_68", "Independent_136_1": "Independent_136_1", "Independent_136_2": "Independent_136_2", "Independent_136_3": "Independent_136_3", "Independent_136_4": "Independent_136_4", "Independent_136_5": "Independent_136_5", "Independent_136_6": "Independent_136_6", "Independent_136_7": "Independent_136_7", "Independent_136_8": "Independent_136_8", "Independent_136_9": "Independent_136_9", "Independent_136_10": "Independent_136_10", "Independent_136_11": "Independent_136_11", "Independent_136_12": "Independent_136_12", "Independent_136_13": "Independent_136_13", "Independent_136_14": "Independent_136_14", "Independent_136_15": "Independent_136_15", "Independent_136_16": "Independent_136_16", "Independent_137_1": "Independent_137_1", "Independent_137_2": "Independent_137_2", "Independent_137_3": "Independent_137_3", "Independent_137_4": "Independent_137_4", "Independent_137_5": "Independent_137_5", "Independent_137_6": "Independent_137_6", "Independent_137_7": "Independent_137_7", "Independent_137_8": "Independent_137_8", "Independent_137_9": "Independent_137_9", "Independent_137_10": "Independent_137_10", "Independent_138_1": "Independent_138_1", "Independent_138_2": "Independent_138_2", "Independent_138_3": "Independent_138_3", "Independent_138_4": "Independent_138_4", "Independent_138_5": "Independent_138_5", "Independent_138_6": "Independent_138_6", "Independent_138_7": "Independent_138_7", "Independent_138_8": "Independent_138_8", "Independent_138_9": "Independent_138_9", "Independent_138_10": "Independent_138_10", "Independent_138_11": "Independent_138_11", "Independent_138_12": "Independent_138_12", "Independent_138_13": "Independent_138_13", "Independent_138_14": "Independent_138_14", "Independent_139_1": "Independent_139_1", "Independent_139_2": "Independent_139_2", "Independent_139_3": "Independent_139_3", "Independent_139_4": "Independent_139_4", "Independent_139_5": "Independent_139_5", "Independent_139_6": "Independent_139_6", "Independent_140_1": "Independent_140_1", "Independent_140_2": "Independent_140_2", "Independent_140_3": "Independent_140_3", "Independent_140_4": "Independent_140_4", "Independent_140_5": "Independent_140_5", "Independent_140_6": "Independent_140_6", "Independent_140_7": "Independent_140_7", "Independent_140_8": "Independent_140_8", "Independent_141_1": "Independent_141_1", "Independent_141_2": "Independent_141_2", "Independent_141_3": "Independent_141_3", "Independent_141_4": "Independent_141_4", "Independent_141_5": "Independent_141_5", "Vidial Valarchi Perani": "Vidial Valarchi Perani", "Independent_141_6": "Independent_141_6", "Independent_141_7": "Independent_141_7", "Independent_141_8": "Independent_141_8", "Independent_141_9": "Independent_141_9", "Independent_141_10": "Independent_141_10", "Independent_141_11": "Independent_141_11", "Independent_141_12": "Independent_141_12", "Independent_142_1": "Independent_142_1", "Independent_142_2": "Independent_142_2", "Independent_142_3": "Independent_142_3", "Independent_142_4": "Independent_142_4", "Independent_142_5": "Independent_142_5", "Independent_142_6": "Independent_142_6", "Independent_143_1": "Independent_143_1", "Independent_143_2": "Independent_143_2", "Independent_143_3": "Independent_143_3", "Independent_143_4": "Independent_143_4", "Independent_143_5": "Independent_143_5", "Independent_143_6": "Independent_143_6", "Independent_144_1": "Independent_144_1", "Independent_144_2": "Independent_144_2", "Akila India Vallalar Peravai": "Akila India Vallalar Peravai", "Independent_144_3": "Independent_144_3", "Independent_144_4": "Independent_144_4", "Independent_144_5": "Independent_144_5", "Independent_144_6": "Independent_144_6", "Independent_144_7": "Independent_144_7", "Independent_144_8": "Independent_144_8", "Independent_144_9": "Independent_144_9", "Independent_144_10": "Independent_144_10", "Independent_144_11": "Independent_144_11", "Independent_144_12": "Independent_144_12", "Independent_144_13": "Independent_144_13", "Independent_144_14": "Independent_144_14", "Independent_144_15": "Independent_144_15", "Independent_144_16": "Independent_144_16", "Independent_144_17": "Independent_144_17", "Independent_145_1": "Independent_145_1", "Independent_145_2": "Independent_145_2", "Independent_145_3": "Independent_145_3", "Independent_145_4": "Independent_145_4", "Independent_145_5": "Independent_145_5", "Independent_145_6": "Independent_145_6", "Independent_145_7": "Independent_145_7", "Independent_145_8": "Independent_145_8", "Independent_145_9": "Independent_145_9", "Independent_145_10": "Independent_145_10", "Independent_145_11": "Independent_145_11", "Independent_145_12": "Independent_145_12", "Independent_146_1": "Independent_146_1", "Independent_146_2": "Independent_146_2", "Independent_146_3": "Independent_146_3", "Independent_146_4": "Independent_146_4", "Independent_147_1": "Independent_147_1", "Independent_148_1": "Independent_148_1", "Independent_148_2": "Independent_148_2", "Independent_148_3": "Independent_148_3", "Independent_148_4": "Independent_148_4", "Independent_148_5": "Independent_148_5", "Independent_148_6": "Independent_148_6", "Independent_148_7": "Independent_148_7", "Independent_148_8": "Independent_148_8", "Independent_148_9": "Independent_148_9", "Independent_148_10": "Independent_148_10", "Independent_148_11": "Independent_148_11", "Independent_148_12": "Independent_148_12", "Independent_148_13": "Independent_148_13", "Independent_148_14": "Independent_148_14", "Independent_148_15": "Independent_148_15", "Independent_149_1": "Independent_149_1", "Independent_149_2": "Independent_149_2", "Independent_149_3": "Independent_149_3", "Independent_149_4": "Independent_149_4", "Independent_149_5": "Independent_149_5", "Independent_149_6": "Independent_149_6", "Independent_150_1": "Independent_150_1", "Independent_150_2": "Independent_150_2", "Independent_150_3": "Independent_150_3", "Independent_150_4": "Independent_150_4", "Independent_150_5": "Independent_150_5", "Independent_150_6": "Independent_150_6", "Independent_151_1": "Independent_151_1", "Independent_151_2": "Independent_151_2", "Independent_151_3": "Independent_151_3", "Independent_151_4": "Independent_151_4", "Independent_151_5": "Independent_151_5", "Independent_151_6": "Independent_151_6", "Independent_151_7": "Independent_151_7", "Independent_151_8": "Independent_151_8", "Independent_152_1": "Independent_152_1", "Independent_152_2": "Independent_152_2", "Independent_152_3": "Independent_152_3", "Independent_152_4": "Independent_152_4", "Independent_152_5": "Independent_152_5", "Independent_152_6": "Independent_152_6", "Independent_152_7": "Independent_152_7", "Independent_152_8": "Independent_152_8", "Independent_152_9": "Independent_152_9", "Independent_152_10": "Independent_152_10", "Independent_152_11": "Independent_152_11", "Independent_152_12": "Independent_152_12", "Independent_152_13": "Independent_152_13", "Independent_152_14": "Independent_152_14", "Independent_152_15": "Independent_152_15", "Independent_152_16": "Independent_152_16", "Independent_152_17": "Independent_152_17", "Independent_152_18": "Independent_152_18", "Independent_153_1": "Independent_153_1", "Independent_153_2": "Independent_153_2", "Independent_153_3": "Independent_153_3", "Independent_153_4": "Independent_153_4", "Independent_153_5": "Independent_153_5", "Independent_153_6": "Independent_153_6", "Independent_154_1": "Independent_154_1", "Independent_154_2": "Independent_154_2", "Independent_154_3": "Independent_154_3", "Independent_154_4": "Independent_154_4", "Independent_154_5": "Independent_154_5", "Independent_154_6": "Independent_154_6", "Independent_154_7": "Independent_154_7", "Independent_154_8": "Independent_154_8", "Independent_154_9": "Independent_154_9", "Independent_154_10": "Independent_154_10", "Independent_155_1": "Independent_155_1", "Independent_155_2": "Independent_155_2", "Independent_155_3": "Independent_155_3", "Independent_155_4": "Independent_155_4", "Independent_155_5": "Independent_155_5", "Independent_155_6": "Independent_155_6", "JD(S)": "JD(S)", "Independent_156_1": "Independent_156_1", "Independent_156_2": "Independent_156_2", "Independent_156_3": "Independent_156_3", "Independent_156_4": "Independent_156_4", "Independent_156_5": "Independent_156_5", "Independent_157_1": "Independent_157_1", "Independent_157_2": "Independent_157_2", "Independent_157_3": "Independent_157_3", "Independent_157_4": "Independent_157_4", "Independent_157_5": "Independent_157_5", "Independent_157_6": "Independent_157_6", "Independent_157_7": "Independent_157_7", "Independent_157_8": "Independent_157_8", "Independent_158_1": "Independent_158_1", "Independent_158_2": "Independent_158_2", "Independent_158_3": "Independent_158_3", "Ilantamilar Munnani Kazhagam": "Ilantamilar Munnani Kazhagam", "Independent_159_1": "Independent_159_1", "Independent_159_2": "Independent_159_2", "Independent_159_3": "Independent_159_3", "Independent_159_4": "Independent_159_4", "Independent_159_5": "Independent_159_5", "Independent_160_1": "Independent_160_1", "Independent_160_2": "Independent_160_2", "Independent_160_3": "Independent_160_3", "Independent_161_1": "Independent_161_1", "Independent_161_2": "Independent_161_2", "Independent_161_3": "Independent_161_3", "Independent_161_4": "Independent_161_4", "Independent_161_5": "Independent_161_5", "Independent_161_6": "Independent_161_6", "Independent_161_7": "Independent_161_7", "Independent_162_1": "Independent_162_1", "Independent_162_2": "Independent_162_2", "Independent_162_3": "Independent_162_3", "Independent_163_1": "Independent_163_1", "Independent_163_2": "Independent_163_2", "Independent_163_3": "Independent_163_3", "Independent_163_4": "Independent_163_4", "Independent_163_5": "Independent_163_5", "Independent_164_1": "Independent_164_1", "Independent_164_2": "Independent_164_2", "Independent_164_3": "Independent_164_3", "Independent_165_1": "Independent_165_1", "Independent_165_2": "Independent_165_2", "Independent_165_3": "Independent_165_3", "Independent_165_4": "Independent_165_4", "Independent_165_5": "Independent_165_5", "Independent_166_1": "Independent_166_1", "AISMK": "AISMK", "Independent_166_2": "Independent_166_2", "Independent_166_3": "Independent_166_3", "Independent_166_4": "Independent_166_4", "Independent_166_5": "Independent_166_5", "Independent_166_6": "Independent_166_6", "Independent_167_1": "Independent_167_1", "Independent_167_2": "Independent_167_2", "Independent_167_3": "Independent_167_3", "Independent_167_4": "Independent_167_4", "Independent_168_1": "Independent_168_1", "Independent_168_2": "Independent_168_2", "Independent_168_3": "Independent_168_3", "Independent_168_4": "Independent_168_4", "Independent_168_5": "Independent_168_5", "Independent_169_1": "Independent_169_1", "Independent_169_2": "Independent_169_2", "Independent_169_3": "Independent_169_3", "Independent_169_4": "Independent_169_4", "Independent_169_5": "Independent_169_5", "Independent_169_6": "Independent_169_6", "Independent_170_1": "Independent_170_1", "Independent_170_2": "Independent_170_2", "Independent_170_3": "Independent_170_3", "Independent_170_4": "Independent_170_4", "Independent_170_5": "Independent_170_5", "Independent_170_6": "Independent_170_6", "Independent_171_1": "Independent_171_1", "Independent_171_2": "Independent_171_2", "Independent_171_3": "Independent_171_3", "Independent_171_4": "Independent_171_4", "Independent_171_5": "Independent_171_5", "Independent_172_1": "Independent_172_1", "Independent_172_2": "Independent_172_2", "Independent_172_3": "Independent_172_3", "Independent_172_4": "Independent_172_4", "Independent_172_5": "Independent_172_5", "Independent_172_6": "Independent_172_6", "Independent_173_1": "Independent_173_1", "Independent_173_2": "Independent_173_2", "Independent_173_3": "Independent_173_3", "Independent_174_1": "Independent_174_1", "People's Party of India(secular)": "People's Party of India(secular)", "Independent_174_2": "Independent_174_2", "Independent_174_3": "Independent_174_3", "Independent_174_4": "Independent_174_4", "Independent_174_5": "Independent_174_5", "Independent_175_1": "Independent_175_1", "Independent_175_2": "Independent_175_2", "Independent_175_3": "Independent_175_3", "Independent_175_4": "Independent_175_4", "Independent_176_1": "Independent_176_1", "Independent_177_1": "Independent_177_1", "Independent_177_2": "Independent_177_2", "Independent_178_1": "Independent_178_1", "Independent_178_2": "Independent_178_2", "Independent_178_3": "Independent_178_3", "Independent_178_4": "Independent_178_4", "Namadhu Makkal Katchi": "Namadhu Makkal Katchi", "Independent_178_5": "Independent_178_5", "Independent_178_6": "Independent_178_6", "Independent_179_1": "Independent_179_1", "Independent_179_2": "Independent_179_2", "Independent_179_3": "Independent_179_3", "Independent_179_4": "Independent_179_4", "Independent_179_5": "Independent_179_5", "Independent_179_6": "Independent_179_6", "Independent_179_7": "Independent_179_7", "Independent_179_8": "Independent_179_8", "Independent_179_9": "Independent_179_9", "Independent_179_10": "Independent_179_10", "Independent_179_11": "Independent_179_11", "Independent_179_12": "Independent_179_12", "Independent_179_13": "Independent_179_13", "Independent_180_1": "Independent_180_1", "Independent_180_2": "Independent_180_2", "Independent_180_3": "Independent_180_3", "Independent_180_4": "Independent_180_4", "Independent_180_5": "Independent_180_5", "Independent_180_6": "Independent_180_6", "Independent_180_7": "Independent_180_7", "Independent_180_8": "Independent_180_8", "Independent_180_9": "Independent_180_9", "Independent_180_10": "Independent_180_10", "Independent_180_11": "Independent_180_11", "Independent_180_12": "Independent_180_12", "Independent_180_13": "Independent_180_13", "Independent_181_1": "Independent_181_1", "Independent_181_2": "Independent_181_2", "Independent_181_3": "Independent_181_3", "Independent_181_4": "Independent_181_4", "Independent_181_5": "Independent_181_5", "Independent_181_6": "Independent_181_6", "Independent_181_7": "Independent_181_7", "Independent_181_8": "Independent_181_8", "Independent_181_9": "Independent_181_9", "Independent_181_10": "Independent_181_10", "Independent_181_11": "Independent_181_11", "Independent_181_12": "Independent_181_12", "Independent_181_13": "Independent_181_13", "Independent_181_14": "Independent_181_14", "Independent_182_1": "Independent_182_1", "Independent_182_2": "Independent_182_2", "Independent_183_1": "Independent_183_1", "Independent_183_2": "Independent_183_2", "Independent_183_3": "Independent_183_3", "Independent_183_4": "Independent_183_4", "Independent_183_5": "Independent_183_5", "Independent_183_6": "Independent_183_6", "Independent_183_7": "Independent_183_7", "Independent_183_8": "Independent_183_8", "Independent_183_9": "Independent_183_9", "Independent_183_10": "Independent_183_10", "Akhila India Jananayaka Makkal Katchi (Dr. Isaac)": "Akhila India Jananayaka Makkal Katchi (Dr. Isaac)", "Independent_183_11": "Independent_183_11", "Independent_183_12": "Independent_183_12", "Independent_184_1": "Independent_184_1", "Independent_184_2": "Independent_184_2", "Independent_184_3": "Independent_184_3", "Independent_184_4": "Independent_184_4", "Independent_184_5": "Independent_184_5", "Independent_185_1": "Independent_185_1", "Independent_185_2": "Independent_185_2", "Independent_185_3": "Independent_185_3", "Independent_185_4": "Independent_185_4", "Independent_185_5": "Independent_185_5", "Independent_185_6": "Independent_185_6", "Independent_185_7": "Independent_185_7", "Independent_185_8": "Independent_185_8", "Independent_185_9": "Independent_185_9", "Independent_185_10": "Independent_185_10", "Independent_185_11": "Independent_185_11", "Independent_185_12": "Independent_185_12", "Independent_185_13": "Independent_185_13", "Independent_185_14": "Independent_185_14", "Independent_185_15": "Independent_185_15", "Independent_185_16": "Independent_185_16", "Independent_185_17": "Independent_185_17", "Independent_185_18": "Independent_185_18", "Independent_186_1": "Independent_186_1", "Independent_186_2": "Independent_186_2", "Independent_186_3": "Independent_186_3", "Independent_186_4": "Independent_186_4", "Independent_186_5": "Independent_186_5", "Independent_186_6": "Independent_186_6", "Independent_186_7": "Independent_186_7", "Independent_186_8": "Independent_186_8", "Independent_187_1": "Independent_187_1", "Independent_187_2": "Independent_187_2", "Independent_187_3": "Independent_187_3", "Independent_187_4": "Independent_187_4", "Independent_187_5": "Independent_187_5", "Independent_188_1": "Independent_188_1", "Independent_188_2": "Independent_188_2", "Independent_188_3": "Independent_188_3", "Independent_188_4": "Independent_188_4", "Independent_188_5": "Independent_188_5", "Independent_188_6": "Independent_188_6", "Independent_188_7": "Independent_188_7", "Independent_188_8": "Independent_188_8", "Independent_188_9": "Independent_188_9", "Independent_189_1": "Independent_189_1", "Independent_189_2": "Independent_189_2", "Independent_189_3": "Independent_189_3", "Independent_189_4": "Independent_189_4", "Independent_189_5": "Independent_189_5", "Independent_190_1": "Independent_190_1", "Independent_190_2": "Independent_190_2", "Independent_190_3": "Independent_190_3", "Independent_190_4": "Independent_190_4", "Independent_190_5": "Independent_190_5", "Independent_190_6": "Independent_190_6", "Independent_190_7": "Independent_190_7", "Independent_190_8": "Independent_190_8", "Independent_190_9": "Independent_190_9", "Independent_190_10": "Independent_190_10", "Independent_190_11": "Independent_190_11", "Independent_191_1": "Independent_191_1", "Independent_191_2": "Independent_191_2", "Independent_191_3": "Independent_191_3", "Independent_191_4": "Independent_191_4", "Independent_191_5": "Independent_191_5", "Independent_191_6": "Independent_191_6", "Independent_191_7": "Independent_191_7", "Independent_191_8": "Independent_191_8", "Independent_192_1": "Independent_192_1", "Independent_192_2": "Independent_192_2", "Independent_192_3": "Independent_192_3", "Independent_192_4": "Independent_192_4", "Independent_192_5": "Independent_192_5", "Independent_192_6": "Independent_192_6", "Independent_193_1": "Independent_193_1", "Independent_193_2": "Independent_193_2", "Independent_193_3": "Independent_193_3", "Independent_193_4": "Independent_193_4", "Tamil Telugu National Party": "Tamil Telugu National Party", "Independent_193_5": "Independent_193_5", "Independent_193_6": "Independent_193_6", "Independent_194_1": "Independent_194_1", "Independent_194_2": "Independent_194_2", "Independent_194_3": "Independent_194_3", "Independent_194_4": "Independent_194_4", "Independent_194_5": "Independent_194_5", "Independent_194_6": "Independent_194_6", "Independent_194_7": "Independent_194_7", "Independent_195_1": "Independent_195_1", "Independent_195_2": "Independent_195_2", "Independent_195_3": "Independent_195_3", "Independent_195_4": "Independent_195_4", "Independent_195_5": "Independent_195_5", "Independent_195_6": "Independent_195_6", "Independent_195_7": "Independent_195_7", "Independent_195_8": "Independent_195_8", "Ambedkar Political Party": "Ambedkar Political Party", "Independent_195_9": "Independent_195_9", "Independent_195_10": "Independent_195_10", "Independent_195_11": "Independent_195_11", "Independent_195_12": "Independent_195_12", "Independent_195_13": "Independent_195_13", "Independent_195_14": "Independent_195_14", "Independent_196_1": "Independent_196_1", "Independent_196_2": "Independent_196_2", "Independent_196_3": "Independent_196_3", "Independent_196_4": "Independent_196_4", "Independent_196_5": "Independent_196_5", "Independent_196_6": "Independent_196_6", "Independent_196_7": "Independent_196_7", "Independent_196_8": "Independent_196_8", "Independent_196_9": "Independent_196_9", "Independent_196_10": "Independent_196_10", "Independent_196_11": "Independent_196_11", "Independent_196_12": "Independent_196_12", "Independent_196_13": "Independent_196_13", "Independent_196_14": "Independent_196_14", "Independent_196_15": "Independent_196_15", "Independent_196_16": "Independent_196_16", "Independent_197_1": "Independent_197_1", "Independent_197_2": "Independent_197_2", "Independent_197_3": "Independent_197_3", "Independent_197_4": "Independent_197_4", "Independent_197_5": "Independent_197_5", "Independent_197_6": "Independent_197_6", "Independent_197_7": "Independent_197_7", "Independent_198_1": "Independent_198_1", "Independent_198_2": "Independent_198_2", "Independent_198_3": "Independent_198_3", "Independent_198_4": "Independent_198_4", "Independent_198_5": "Independent_198_5", "Independent_198_6": "Independent_198_6", "Independent_198_7": "Independent_198_7", "All India MGR Makkal Munnetra Kazhagam": "All India MGR Makkal Munnetra Kazhagam", "Independent_198_8": "Independent_198_8", "Independent_198_9": "Independent_198_9", "Independent_199_1": "Independent_199_1", "Independent_199_2": "Independent_199_2", "Independent_199_3": "Independent_199_3", "Independent_199_4": "Independent_199_4", "Independent_199_5": "Independent_199_5", "Independent_199_6": "Independent_199_6", "Independent_199_7": "Independent_199_7", "Independent_199_8": "Independent_199_8", "Independent_200_1": "Independent_200_1", "Independent_200_2": "Independent_200_2", "Independent_200_3": "Independent_200_3", "Independent_200_4": "Independent_200_4", "Independent_200_5": "Independent_200_5", "Independent_200_6": "Independent_200_6", "Independent_200_7": "Independent_200_7", "Independent_200_8": "Independent_200_8", "Independent_200_9": "Independent_200_9", "Independent_200_10": "Independent_200_10", "Independent_200_11": "Independent_200_11", "Independent_200_12": "Independent_200_12", "Independent_200_13": "Independent_200_13", "Independent_200_14": "Independent_200_14", "Independent_201_1": "Independent_201_1", "Independent_201_2": "Independent_201_2", "Independent_201_3": "Independent_201_3", "Independent_201_4": "Independent_201_4", "Independent_201_5": "Independent_201_5", "Independent_201_6": "Independent_201_6", "Independent_202_1": "Independent_202_1", "Independent_202_2": "Independent_202_2", "Independent_202_3": "Independent_202_3", "Independent_202_4": "Independent_202_4", "Independent_202_5": "Independent_202_5", "Independent_202_6": "Independent_202_6", "Independent_202_7": "Independent_202_7", "Independent_203_1": "Independent_203_1", "Independent_203_2": "Independent_203_2", "Independent_203_3": "Independent_203_3", "Independent_203_4": "Independent_203_4", "Independent_203_5": "Independent_203_5", "Independent_203_6": "Independent_203_6", "Independent_204_1": "Independent_204_1", "Independent_204_2": "Independent_204_2", "Independent_204_3": "Independent_204_3", "Independent_204_4": "Independent_204_4", "Independent_204_5": "Independent_204_5", "Independent_204_6": "Independent_204_6", "Independent_204_7": "Independent_204_7", "Independent_204_8": "Independent_204_8", "Independent_204_9": "Independent_204_9", "Independent_204_10": "Independent_204_10", "Independent_204_11": "Independent_204_11", "Independent_204_12": "Independent_204_12", "Independent_204_13": "Independent_204_13", "Independent_204_14": "Independent_204_14", "Independent_204_15": "Independent_204_15", "Independent_204_16": "Independent_204_16", "Independent_205_1": "Independent_205_1", "Independent_205_2": "Independent_205_2", "Independent_205_3": "Independent_205_3", "Independent_205_4": "Independent_205_4", "Independent_205_5": "Independent_205_5", "Independent_205_6": "Independent_205_6", "Independent_205_7": "Independent_205_7", "Independent_205_8": "Independent_205_8", "Independent_205_9": "Independent_205_9", "Independent_205_10": "Independent_205_10", "Independent_205_11": "Independent_205_11", "Independent_205_12": "Independent_205_12", "Independent_205_13": "Independent_205_13", "Independent_205_14": "Independent_205_14", "Independent_206_1": "Independent_206_1", "Independent_206_2": "Independent_206_2", "Naam Indiar Party": "Naam Indiar Party", "Independent_206_3": "Independent_206_3", "Independent_206_4": "Independent_206_4", "Independent_206_5": "Independent_206_5", "Independent_206_6": "Independent_206_6", "Desa Makkal Munnetrak Kazhgam": "Desa Makkal Munnetrak Kazhgam", "Independent_206_7": "Independent_206_7", "Independent_206_8": "Independent_206_8", "Independent_206_9": "Independent_206_9", "Independent_206_10": "Independent_206_10", "Independent_206_11": "Independent_206_11", "Independent_207_1": "Independent_207_1", "Independent_207_2": "Independent_207_2", "Independent_207_3": "Independent_207_3", "Independent_207_4": "Independent_207_4", "Independent_207_5": "Independent_207_5", "Independent_207_6": "Independent_207_6", "Independent_207_7": "Independent_207_7", "Independent_207_8": "Independent_207_8", "Independent_207_9": "Independent_207_9", "Independent_207_10": "Independent_207_10", "Independent_207_11": "Independent_207_11", "Independent_207_12": "Independent_207_12", "Independent_207_13": "Independent_207_13", "Independent_207_14": "Independent_207_14", "Independent_207_15": "Independent_207_15", "Independent_207_16": "Independent_207_16", "Independent_207_17": "Independent_207_17", "Independent_207_18": "Independent_207_18", "Independent_207_19": "Independent_207_19", "Independent_208_1": "Independent_208_1", "Independent_208_2": "Independent_208_2", "Independent_208_3": "Independent_208_3", "Independent_208_4": "Independent_208_4", "Independent_208_5": "Independent_208_5", "Independent_208_6": "Independent_208_6", "Independent_208_7": "Independent_208_7", "Independent_208_8": "Independent_208_8", "Independent_208_9": "Independent_208_9", "Independent_208_10": "Independent_208_10", "Independent_208_11": "Independent_208_11", "Independent_208_12": "Independent_208_12", "Independent_208_13": "Independent_208_13", "Independent_209_1": "Independent_209_1", "Independent_209_2": "Independent_209_2", "Independent_209_3": "Independent_209_3", "Independent_209_4": "Independent_209_4", "Independent_209_5": "Independent_209_5", "Independent_209_6": "Independent_209_6", "Independent_209_7": "Independent_209_7", "Independent_209_8": "Independent_209_8", "Independent_210_1": "Independent_210_1", "Independent_210_2": "Independent_210_2", "Independent_210_3": "Independent_210_3", "Independent_210_4": "Independent_210_4", "Independent_210_5": "Independent_210_5", "Independent_210_6": "Independent_210_6", "Independent_210_7": "Independent_210_7", "Independent_211_1": "Independent_211_1", "Independent_211_2": "Independent_211_2", "Independent_211_3": "Independent_211_3", "Independent_211_4": "Independent_211_4", "Independent_211_5": "Independent_211_5", "Independent_211_6": "Independent_211_6", "Independent_211_7": "Independent_211_7", "Independent_211_8": "Independent_211_8", "Independent_211_9": "Independent_211_9", "Independent_211_10": "Independent_211_10", "Independent_212_1": "Independent_212_1", "Independent_212_2": "Independent_212_2", "Independent_212_3": "Independent_212_3", "Independent_212_4": "Independent_212_4", "Independent_212_5": "Independent_212_5", "Independent_212_6": "Independent_212_6", "Independent_212_7": "Independent_212_7", "Independent_212_8": "Independent_212_8", "Independent_212_9": "Independent_212_9", "Independent_212_10": "Independent_212_10", "Independent_212_11": "Independent_212_11", "Independent_212_12": "Independent_212_12", "South India Forward Bloc": "South India Forward Bloc", "Independent_213_1": "Independent_213_1", "Independent_213_2": "Independent_213_2", "Independent_213_3": "Independent_213_3", "Independent_213_4": "Independent_213_4", "Independent_213_5": "Independent_213_5", "Independent_214_1": "Independent_214_1", "Independent_214_2": "Independent_214_2", "Independent_214_3": "Independent_214_3", "Independent_214_4": "Independent_214_4", "Independent_214_5": "Independent_214_5", "Independent_214_6": "Independent_214_6", "Independent_214_7": "Independent_214_7", "Independent_214_8": "Independent_214_8", "Independent_214_9": "Independent_214_9", "Independent_214_10": "Independent_214_10", "Independent_214_11": "Independent_214_11", "Independent_214_12": "Independent_214_12", "Independent_214_13": "Independent_214_13", "Independent_214_14": "Independent_214_14", "Independent_215_1": "Independent_215_1", "Independent_215_2": "Independent_215_2", "Independent_215_3": "Independent_215_3", "Independent_215_4": "Independent_215_4", "Independent_215_5": "Independent_215_5", "Independent_215_6": "Independent_215_6", "Independent_215_7": "Independent_215_7", "Independent_215_8": "Independent_215_8", "Independent_216_1": "Independent_216_1", "Independent_216_2": "Independent_216_2", "Independent_216_3": "Independent_216_3", "Independent_216_4": "Independent_216_4", "Independent_216_5": "Independent_216_5", "Independent_216_6": "Independent_216_6", "Independent_216_7": "Independent_216_7", "Independent_216_8": "Independent_216_8", "Aanaithinthiya Jananayaka Pathukappu Kazhagam": "Aanaithinthiya Jananayaka Pathukappu Kazhagam", "Independent_216_9": "Independent_216_9", "Independent_216_10": "Independent_216_10", "Independent_216_11": "Independent_216_11", "Independent_216_12": "Independent_216_12", "Independent_217_1": "Independent_217_1", "Independent_217_2": "Independent_217_2", "Independent_217_3": "Independent_217_3", "Independent_217_4": "Independent_217_4", "Independent_217_5": "Independent_217_5", "Independent_217_6": "Independent_217_6", "Independent_217_7": "Independent_217_7", "Independent_217_8": "Independent_217_8", "Independent_217_9": "Independent_217_9", "Independent_218_1": "Independent_218_1", "Independent_218_2": "Independent_218_2", "Independent_218_3": "Independent_218_3", "Independent_218_4": "Independent_218_4", "Independent_218_5": "Independent_218_5", "Independent_218_6": "Independent_218_6", "Independent_218_7": "Independent_218_7", "Independent_218_8": "Independent_218_8", "Independent_218_9": "Independent_218_9", "Independent_218_10": "Independent_218_10", "Independent_218_11": "Independent_218_11", "Independent_218_12": "Independent_218_12", "Universal Brotherhood Movement": "Universal Brotherhood Movement", "Independent_218_13": "Independent_218_13", "Independent_218_14": "Independent_218_14", "Independent_218_15": "Independent_218_15", "Independent_218_16": "Independent_218_16", "Independent_219_1": "Independent_219_1", "Independent_219_2": "Independent_219_2", "Independent_219_3": "Independent_219_3", "Independent_219_4": "Independent_219_4", "Independent_219_5": "Independent_219_5", "Independent_219_6": "Independent_219_6", "Independent_220_1": "Independent_220_1", "Independent_220_2": "Independent_220_2", "Independent_221_1": "Independent_221_1", "Independent_221_2": "Independent_221_2", "Independent_221_3": "Independent_221_3", "Independent_221_4": "Independent_221_4", "Independent_221_5": "Independent_221_5", "Independent_221_6": "Independent_221_6", "Independent_221_7": "Independent_221_7", "Independent_221_8": "Independent_221_8", "Independent_221_9": "Independent_221_9", "Independent_221_10": "Independent_221_10", "Independent_221_11": "Independent_221_11", "Independent_221_12": "Independent_221_12", "Independent_221_13": "Independent_221_13", "Independent_221_14": "Independent_221_14", "Independent_221_15": "Independent_221_15", "Independent_222_1": "Independent_222_1", "Independent_222_2": "Independent_222_2", "Independent_222_3": "Independent_222_3", "Independent_222_4": "Independent_222_4", "Independent_222_5": "Independent_222_5", "Independent_222_6": "Independent_222_6", "Independent_222_7": "Independent_222_7", "Independent_223_1": "Independent_223_1", "Independent_223_2": "Independent_223_2", "Independent_223_3": "Independent_223_3", "Independent_223_4": "Independent_223_4", "Independent_224_1": "Independent_224_1", "Independent_224_2": "Independent_224_2", "Independent_224_3": "Independent_224_3", "Independent_224_4": "Independent_224_4", "Independent_224_5": "Independent_224_5", "Independent_224_6": "Independent_224_6", "Independent_224_7": "Independent_224_7", "Independent_224_8": "Independent_224_8", "Independent_225_1": "Independent_225_1", "Independent_225_2": "Independent_225_2", "Independent_225_3": "Independent_225_3", "Independent_225_4": "Independent_225_4", "Independent_225_5": "Independent_225_5", "Independent_226_1": "Independent_226_1", "Independent_226_2": "Independent_226_2", "Independent_226_3": "Independent_226_3", "Independent_227_1": "Independent_227_1", "Independent_227_2": "Independent_227_2", "Independent_227_3": "Independent_227_3", "Anaithu Ulaga Tamilargal Munnetra Kalagam": "Anaithu Ulaga Tamilargal Munnetra Kalagam", "Independent_227_4": "Independent_227_4", "Independent_227_5": "Independent_227_5", "Independent_227_6": "Independent_227_6", "Independent_227_7": "Independent_227_7", "Independent_228_1": "Independent_228_1", "Independent_228_2": "Independent_228_2", "Independent_228_3": "Independent_228_3", "Independent_228_4": "Independent_228_4", "Independent_228_5": "Independent_228_5", "Independent_228_6": "Independent_228_6", "Independent_228_7": "Independent_228_7", "Independent_228_8": "Independent_228_8", "Independent_228_9": "Independent_228_9", "Independent_228_10": "Independent_228_10", "Independent_228_11": "Independent_228_11", "Independent_228_12": "Independent_228_12", "Independent_228_13": "Independent_228_13", "Independent_228_14": "Independent_228_14", "Independent_228_15": "Independent_228_15", "Independent_228_16": "Independent_228_16", "Independent_228_17": "Independent_228_17", "Independent_229_1": "Independent_229_1", "Independent_229_2": "Independent_229_2", "Independent_229_3": "Independent_229_3", "Independent_229_4": "Independent_229_4", "Independent_229_5": "Independent_229_5", "Independent_229_6": "Independent_229_6", "Independent_229_7": "Independent_229_7", "Independent_230_1": "Independent_230_1", "Independent_230_2": "Independent_230_2", "Independent_230_3": "Independent_230_3", "Independent_230_4": "Independent_230_4", "Independent_230_5": "Independent_230_5", "Independent_230_6": "Independent_230_6", "Independent_230_7": "Independent_230_7", "Independent_230_8": "Independent_230_8", "Independent_231_1": "Independent_231_1", "Independent_231_2": "Independent_231_2", "Independent_231_3": "Independent_231_3", "Independent_232_1": "Independent_232_1", "Independent_232_2": "Independent_232_2", "Independent_232_3": "Independent_232_3", "Independent_232_4": "Independent_232_4", "Independent_232_5": "Independent_232_5", "Independent_232_6": "Independent_232_6", "Independent_233_1": "Independent_233_1", "Independent_233_2": "Independent_233_2", "Independent_233_3": "Independent_233_3", "Ulaga Makkal Katchi": "Ulaga Makkal Katchi", "Independent_233_4": "Independent_233_4", "Independent_233_5": "Independent_233_5", "Independent_233_6": "Independent_233_6", "Independent_233_7": "Independent_233_7", "Independent_234_1": "Independent_234_1", "Independent_234_2": "Independent_234_2", "Independent_234_3": "Independent_234_3", "Independent_234_4": "Independent_234_4", "Independent_234_5": "Independent_234_5", "Tamilnadu Mahatma Gandhi Makkal Katchi": "Tamilnadu Mahatma Gandhi Makkal Katchi"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 234, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 234, "registered_not_positive": 234}, "n_stations_flagged": 234, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:30:11.860641", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.398, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.307, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.398, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.398, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.307, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.307, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.234, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.234, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.687, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.466, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.466, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 234}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "99d7eb9925454c1090597def30967cfa", "name": "India 2023 local (overnight india_karnataka_2023_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Karnataka/Karnataka_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"BJP": "BJP", "NCP": "NCP", "INC": "INC", "None of the Above": "None of the Above", "Kalyana Rajya Pragathi Paksha": "Kalyana Rajya Pragathi Paksha", "JD(S)": "JD(S)", "AAAP": "AAAP", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "Independent_1_3": "Independent_1_3", "Independent_1_4": "Independent_1_4", "BSP": "BSP", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "Karnataka Rajya Ryota Sangha": "Karnataka Rajya Ryota Sangha", "Bahujan Bharat Party": "Bahujan Bharat Party", "Indian Movement Party": "Indian Movement Party", "Karnataka Rashtra Samithi": "Karnataka Rashtra Samithi", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "Uttama Prajaakeeya Party": "Uttama Prajaakeeya Party", "Independent_3_3": "Independent_3_3", "Independent_3_4": "Independent_3_4", "Independent_3_5": "Independent_3_5", "Azad Mazdoor Kissan Party": "Azad Mazdoor Kissan Party", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "RSPS": "RSPS", "Dr. Ambedkar People's Party": "Dr. Ambedkar People's Party", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "Independent_6_2": "Independent_6_2", "Independent_6_3": "Independent_6_3", "Independent_6_4": "Independent_6_4", "Independent_6_5": "Independent_6_5", "Bharatiya Rashtravadi Paksha": "Bharatiya Rashtravadi Paksha", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "Swayam Krushi Party": "Swayam Krushi Party", "Independent_8_3": "Independent_8_3", "Independent_8_4": "Independent_8_4", "Independent_8_5": "Independent_8_5", "Independent_8_6": "Independent_8_6", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "Independent_9_2": "Independent_9_2", "Independent_9_3": "Independent_9_3", "Socialist Party (India)": "Socialist Party (India)", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "Independent_11_3": "Independent_11_3", "Independent_11_4": "Independent_11_4", "Independent_11_5": "Independent_11_5", "RPI": "RPI", "Independent_11_6": "Independent_11_6", "Independent_11_7": "Independent_11_7", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "Independent_12_3": "Independent_12_3", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "Independent_13_3": "Independent_13_3", "Independent_13_4": "Independent_13_4", "Republican Party of India (A)": "Republican Party of India (A)", "Independent_13_5": "Independent_13_5", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "ShivSena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray)": "ShivSena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray)", "Independent_14_3": "Independent_14_3", "Independent_14_4": "Independent_14_4", "Independent_14_5": "Independent_14_5", "Independent_14_6": "Independent_14_6", "Independent_14_7": "Independent_14_7", "Karnataka Makkala Paksha": "Karnataka Makkala Paksha", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_15_2": "Independent_15_2", "Karunaadu Party": "Karunaadu Party", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "Independent_17_3": "Independent_17_3", "Independent_17_4": "Independent_17_4", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_18_3": "Independent_18_3", "Independent_18_4": "Independent_18_4", "Independent_18_5": "Independent_18_5", "Independent_18_6": "Independent_18_6", "Independent_18_7": "Independent_18_7", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "KJP": "KJP", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_20_2": "Independent_20_2", "SDPI": "SDPI", "Independent_20_3": "Independent_20_3", "Independent_20_4": "Independent_20_4", "Independent_20_5": "Independent_20_5", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_21_2": "Independent_21_2", "Independent_21_3": "Independent_21_3", "Independent_21_4": "Independent_21_4", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_22_2": "Independent_22_2", "Independent_22_3": "Independent_22_3", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_23_2": "Independent_23_2", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "Independent_24_2": "Independent_24_2", "Independent_24_3": "Independent_24_3", "Independent_24_4": "Independent_24_4", "Raita Bharat Party": "Raita Bharat Party", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "Independent_25_4": "Independent_25_4", "Independent_25_5": "Independent_25_5", "RJSMP": "RJSMP", "Bharatiya Praja Aikyata Party": "Bharatiya Praja Aikyata Party", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "Independent_27_3": "Independent_27_3", "Independent_27_4": "Independent_27_4", "Republican Party of India Bharatha": "Republican Party of India Bharatha", "AIMIM": "AIMIM", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "Aihra National Party": "Aihra National Party", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "Independent_29_4": "Independent_29_4", "Independent_29_5": "Independent_29_5", "Independent_29_6": "Independent_29_6", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray)": "Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray)", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "Independent_30_3": "Independent_30_3", "Independent_30_4": "Independent_30_4", "Independent_30_5": "Independent_30_5", "SUCI": "SUCI", "Independent_30_6": "Independent_30_6", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Rani Chennamma Party": "Rani Chennamma Party", "Independent_31_2": "Independent_31_2", "Independent_31_3": "Independent_31_3", "Independent_31_4": "Independent_31_4", "Hindustan Janta Party": "Hindustan Janta Party", "Sarvajanika Adarsha Sena": "Sarvajanika Adarsha Sena", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "SP": "SP", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "CPI": "CPI", "Independent_35_2": "Independent_35_2", "Independent_35_3": "Independent_35_3", "Independent_35_4": "Independent_35_4", "Independent_35_5": "Independent_35_5", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_36_3": "Independent_36_3", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "Independent_37_3": "Independent_37_3", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_38_3": "Independent_38_3", "All India Ulama Congress": "All India Ulama Congress", "Independent_38_4": "Independent_38_4", "Independent_38_5": "Independent_38_5", "Independent_38_6": "Independent_38_6", "Independent_38_7": "Independent_38_7", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "Independent_41_3": "Independent_41_3", "Independent_41_4": "Independent_41_4", "Jana Spandana Party": "Jana Spandana Party", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_42_2": "Independent_42_2", "Independent_42_3": "Independent_42_3", "Independent_42_4": "Independent_42_4", "CPM": "CPM", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_43_2": "Independent_43_2", "Independent_43_3": "Independent_43_3", "Independent_43_4": "Independent_43_4", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "Independent_44_3": "Independent_44_3", "Independent_44_4": "Independent_44_4", "Independent_44_5": "Independent_44_5", "Independent_44_6": "Independent_44_6", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_45_2": "Independent_45_2", "Independent_45_3": "Independent_45_3", "Janata Dal(United)": "Janata Dal(United)", "ABML(S)": "ABML(S)", "Bhartiya Jan Samrat Party": "Bhartiya Jan Samrat Party", "All India Majlis-E-Inquilab-E-Millat": "All India Majlis-E-Inquilab-E-Millat", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "Independent_46_3": "Independent_46_3", "Independent_46_4": "Independent_46_4", "BhartiyaBahujanKranti Dal": "BhartiyaBahujanKranti Dal", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_50_3": "Independent_50_3", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_51_3": "Independent_51_3", "Independent_51_4": "Independent_51_4", "Independent_51_5": "Independent_51_5", "Independent_51_6": "Independent_51_6", "Independent_51_7": "Independent_51_7", "Independent_51_8": "Independent_51_8", "Rashtriya Maratha Party": "Rashtriya Maratha Party", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "Samajwadi Janata Party(Karnataka)": "Samajwadi Janata Party(Karnataka)", "Janahitha Paksha": "Janahitha Paksha", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_54_3": "Independent_54_3", "Independent_54_4": "Independent_54_4", "Independent_54_5": "Independent_54_5", "Independent_54_6": "Independent_54_6", "Independent_54_7": "Independent_54_7", "Country Citizen Party": "Country Citizen Party", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_58_1": "Independent_58_1", "Independent_58_2": "Independent_58_2", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_59_2": "Independent_59_2", "Independent_59_3": "Independent_59_3", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "Independent_60_3": "Independent_60_3", "Independent_60_4": "Independent_60_4", "Independent_60_5": "Independent_60_5", "Navarang Congress Party": "Navarang Congress Party", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "Independent_61_3": "Independent_61_3", "Independent_61_4": "Independent_61_4", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_62_3": "Independent_62_3", "Bharatiya Prajagala Kalyana Paksha": "Bharatiya Prajagala Kalyana Paksha", "Independent_62_4": "Independent_62_4", "ABHM": "ABHM", "Independent_62_5": "Independent_62_5", "Independent_62_6": "Independent_62_6", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "Independent_63_3": "Independent_63_3", "Independent_63_4": "Independent_63_4", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_64_2": "Independent_64_2", "Independent_64_3": "Independent_64_3", "Independent_64_4": "Independent_64_4", "Independent_64_5": "Independent_64_5", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_65_2": "Independent_65_2", "Independent_65_3": "Independent_65_3", "Independent_65_4": "Independent_65_4", "Independent_65_5": "Independent_65_5", "Independent_65_6": "Independent_65_6", "Independent_65_7": "Independent_65_7", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_66_2": "Independent_66_2", "Independent_66_3": "Independent_66_3", "Independent_66_4": "Independent_66_4", "Independent_66_5": "Independent_66_5", "Independent_66_6": "Independent_66_6", "Independent_67_1": "Independent_67_1", "Independent_67_2": "Independent_67_2", "Independent_67_3": "Independent_67_3", "Independent_67_4": "Independent_67_4", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "Independent_68_3": "Independent_68_3", "Independent_68_4": "Independent_68_4", "Independent_68_5": "Independent_68_5", "Independent_68_6": "Independent_68_6", "Independent_68_7": "Independent_68_7", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_69_3": "Independent_69_3", "Independent_69_4": "Independent_69_4", "Independent_69_5": "Independent_69_5", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "Independent_70_2": "Independent_70_2", "Independent_70_3": "Independent_70_3", "Independent_70_4": "Independent_70_4", "Independent_70_5": "Independent_70_5", "Independent_70_6": "Independent_70_6", "Independent_70_7": "Independent_70_7", "Independent_70_8": "Independent_70_8", "Independent_71_1": "Independent_71_1", "Independent_71_2": "Independent_71_2", "Independent_71_3": "Independent_71_3", "Independent_71_4": "Independent_71_4", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_72_2": "Independent_72_2", "Hindustan Janta Party Secular": "Hindustan Janta Party Secular", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "Independent_73_3": "Independent_73_3", "Lok Shakti": "Lok Shakti", "Independent_73_4": "Independent_73_4", "Independent_73_5": "Independent_73_5", "Independent_73_6": "Independent_73_6", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_74_2": "Independent_74_2", "Independent_74_3": "Independent_74_3", "All India Hindustan Congress Party": "All India Hindustan Congress Party", "Independent_74_4": "Independent_74_4", "Independent_74_5": "Independent_74_5", "Proutist Bloc, India": "Proutist Bloc, India", "Independent_74_6": "Independent_74_6", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_75_2": "Independent_75_2", "Independent_75_3": "Independent_75_3", "Independent_75_4": "Independent_75_4", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_77_2": "Independent_77_2", "Independent_77_3": "Independent_77_3", "Independent_77_4": "Independent_77_4", "Independent_77_5": "Independent_77_5", "Independent_77_6": "Independent_77_6", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_78_2": "Independent_78_2", "Independent_78_3": "Independent_78_3", "Independent_79_1": "Independent_79_1", "Bharathiya Belaku Party": "Bharathiya Belaku Party", "Independent_79_2": "Independent_79_2", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_80_2": "Independent_80_2", "Independent_80_3": "Independent_80_3", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "Independent_81_2": "Independent_81_2", "Independent_81_3": "Independent_81_3", "Independent_82_1": "Independent_82_1", "Independent_82_2": "Independent_82_2", "Independent_82_3": "Independent_82_3", "Independent_82_4": "Independent_82_4", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_83_2": "Independent_83_2", "Independent_83_3": "Independent_83_3", "Independent_83_4": "Independent_83_4", "Independent_84_1": "Independent_84_1", "Independent_84_2": "Independent_84_2", "Independent_84_3": "Independent_84_3", "Independent_86_1": "Independent_86_1", "Independent_87_1": "Independent_87_1", "Independent_87_2": "Independent_87_2", "Independent_87_3": "Independent_87_3", "Independent_87_4": "Independent_87_4", "Independent_87_5": "Independent_87_5", "Independent_88_1": "Independent_88_1", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_89_2": "Independent_89_2", "Independent_89_3": "Independent_89_3", "Independent_90_1": "Independent_90_1", "Independent_90_2": "Independent_90_2", "Independent_90_3": "Independent_90_3", "Independent_90_4": "Independent_90_4", "Independent_90_5": "Independent_90_5", "Independent_90_6": "Independent_90_6", "Desh Prem Party": "Desh Prem Party", "Independent_92_1": "Independent_92_1", "Independent_92_2": "Independent_92_2", "AIFB": "AIFB", "Independent_93_1": "Independent_93_1", "Independent_93_2": "Independent_93_2", "Independent_93_3": "Independent_93_3", "Independent_94_1": "Independent_94_1", "Independent_94_2": "Independent_94_2", "Independent_94_3": "Independent_94_3", "Independent_94_4": "Independent_94_4", "Independent_94_5": "Independent_94_5", "Republican Party of India (Karnataka)": "Republican Party of India (Karnataka)", "Independent_94_6": "Independent_94_6", "Independent_94_7": "Independent_94_7", "Independent_94_8": "Independent_94_8", "Independent_94_9": "Independent_94_9", "Independent_94_10": "Independent_94_10", "Independent_94_11": "Independent_94_11", "Independent_94_12": "Independent_94_12", "Independent_95_1": "Independent_95_1", "Independent_96_1": "Independent_96_1", "Independent_97_1": "Independent_97_1", "Independent_97_2": "Independent_97_2", "Independent_97_3": "Independent_97_3", "Independent_97_4": "Independent_97_4", "Independent_98_1": "Independent_98_1", "Independent_98_2": "Independent_98_2", "Independent_99_1": "Independent_99_1", "Independent_99_2": "Independent_99_2", "Independent_99_3": "Independent_99_3", "Independent_99_4": "Independent_99_4", "Independent_99_5": "Independent_99_5", "Independent_99_6": "Independent_99_6", "Independent_99_7": "Independent_99_7", "Independent_99_8": "Independent_99_8", "Independent_99_9": "Independent_99_9", "Sarvodaya Karnataka Paksha": "Sarvodaya Karnataka Paksha", "Independent_99_10": "Independent_99_10", "Independent_99_11": "Independent_99_11", "KSRKP": "KSRKP", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_100_2": "Independent_100_2", "Independent_100_3": "Independent_100_3", "Independent_101_1": "Independent_101_1", "Independent_101_2": "Independent_101_2", "Independent_101_3": "Independent_101_3", "Independent_101_4": "Independent_101_4", "Independent_101_5": "Independent_101_5", "Independent_101_6": "Independent_101_6", "Independent_102_1": "Independent_102_1", "Independent_102_2": "Independent_102_2", "Independent_102_3": "Independent_102_3", "Independent_102_4": "Independent_102_4", "Jai Maha Bharath Party": "Jai Maha Bharath Party", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_103_2": "Independent_103_2", "Independent_103_3": "Independent_103_3", "Independent_103_4": "Independent_103_4", "Independent_103_5": "Independent_103_5", "Independent_103_6": "Independent_103_6", "Independent_103_7": "Independent_103_7", "Independent_104_1": "Independent_104_1", "Independent_104_2": "Independent_104_2", "Independent_104_3": "Independent_104_3", "Independent_104_4": "Independent_104_4", "Independent_104_5": "Independent_104_5", "Independent_104_6": "Independent_104_6", "Independent_104_7": "Independent_104_7", "Independent_104_8": "Independent_104_8", "Independent_105_1": "Independent_105_1", "Independent_105_2": "Independent_105_2", "Independent_105_3": "Independent_105_3", "Independent_105_4": "Independent_105_4", "Karnataka Pragnyavantha Janatha Party": "Karnataka Pragnyavantha Janatha Party", "Independent_106_1": "Independent_106_1", "Independent_106_2": "Independent_106_2", "Independent_106_3": "Independent_106_3", "Independent_106_4": "Independent_106_4", "Independent_106_5": "Independent_106_5", "Independent_106_6": "Independent_106_6", "Sanyukt Vikas Party": "Sanyukt Vikas Party", "Independent_107_1": "Independent_107_1", "Independent_107_2": "Independent_107_2", "Independent_107_3": "Independent_107_3", "Independent_107_4": "Independent_107_4", "Independent_107_5": "Independent_107_5", "Independent_108_1": "Independent_108_1", "Independent_108_2": "Independent_108_2", "Independent_108_3": "Independent_108_3", "Independent_108_4": "Independent_108_4", "Independent_108_5": "Independent_108_5", "Independent_108_6": "Independent_108_6", "Independent_109_1": "Independent_109_1", "Independent_109_2": "Independent_109_2", "Independent_109_3": "Independent_109_3", "Independent_110_1": "Independent_110_1", "Independent_110_2": "Independent_110_2", "Independent_110_3": "Independent_110_3", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "Independent_111_2": "Independent_111_2", "Independent_111_3": "Independent_111_3", "Independent_111_4": "Independent_111_4", "Independent_112_1": "Independent_112_1", "Independent_112_2": "Independent_112_2", "Independent_112_3": "Independent_112_3", "Independent_112_4": "Independent_112_4", "Independent_112_5": "Independent_112_5", "Independent_112_6": "Independent_112_6", "Independent_112_7": "Independent_112_7", "Independent_113_1": "Independent_113_1", "Independent_113_2": "Independent_113_2", "Independent_113_3": "Independent_113_3", "Independent_113_4": "Independent_113_4", "Independent_113_5": "Independent_113_5", "Independent_113_6": "Independent_113_6", "Independent_113_7": "Independent_113_7", "Independent_113_8": "Independent_113_8", "Independent_113_9": "Independent_113_9", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_115_2": "Independent_115_2", "Independent_115_3": "Independent_115_3", "Independent_115_4": "Independent_115_4", "Independent_115_5": "Independent_115_5", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "Independent_116_2": "Independent_116_2", "Independent_116_3": "Independent_116_3", "Independent_117_1": "Independent_117_1", "Independent_117_2": "Independent_117_2", "Independent_117_3": "Independent_117_3", "Independent_118_1": "Independent_118_1", "Independent_118_2": "Independent_118_2", "Independent_118_3": "Independent_118_3", "Rashtriya Samaj Dal (R)": "Rashtriya Samaj Dal (R)", "Independent_119_1": "Independent_119_1", "Independent_122_1": "Independent_122_1", "Independent_122_2": "Independent_122_2", "Independent_122_3": "Independent_122_3", "Independent_122_4": "Independent_122_4", "Independent_123_1": "Independent_123_1", "Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) Red Star": "Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) Red Star", "Independent_123_2": "Independent_123_2", "Independent_123_3": "Independent_123_3", "Independent_123_4": "Independent_123_4", "Independent_123_5": "Independent_123_5", "Proutist Sarva Samaj": "Proutist Sarva Samaj", "Independent_124_1": "Independent_124_1", "Independent_124_2": "Independent_124_2", "Independent_125_1": "Independent_125_1", "Independent_125_2": "Independent_125_2", "Independent_125_3": "Independent_125_3", "Independent_125_4": "Independent_125_4", "Independent_125_5": "Independent_125_5", "Independent_125_6": "Independent_125_6", "Independent_125_7": "Independent_125_7", "Independent_125_8": "Independent_125_8", "Independent_125_9": "Independent_125_9", "Independent_126_1": "Independent_126_1", "Independent_126_2": "Independent_126_2", "Independent_126_3": "Independent_126_3", "Independent_126_4": "Independent_126_4", "Independent_126_5": "Independent_126_5", "Independent_126_6": "Independent_126_6", "Independent_126_7": "Independent_126_7", "Independent_126_8": "Independent_126_8", "Independent_126_9": "Independent_126_9", "Independent_127_1": "Independent_127_1", "Independent_127_2": "Independent_127_2", "Independent_127_3": "Independent_127_3", "Independent_128_1": "Independent_128_1", "Independent_128_2": "Independent_128_2", "Independent_128_3": "Independent_128_3", "Independent_128_4": "Independent_128_4", "AIMEP": "AIMEP", "Welfare Party Of India": "Welfare Party Of India", "Independent_129_1": "Independent_129_1", "Kannada Deshada Paksha": "Kannada Deshada Paksha", "Independent_129_2": "Independent_129_2", "Independent_129_3": "Independent_129_3", "Independent_129_4": "Independent_129_4", "Independent_130_1": "Independent_130_1", "Independent_130_2": "Independent_130_2", "Independent_131_1": "Independent_131_1", "Independent_131_2": "Independent_131_2", "Rashtriya Janahita Party": "Rashtriya Janahita Party", "Independent_132_1": "Independent_132_1", "Independent_132_2": "Independent_132_2", "Independent_132_3": "Independent_132_3", "Independent_132_4": "Independent_132_4", "Independent_132_5": "Independent_132_5", "Independent_132_6": "Independent_132_6", "Independent_133_1": "Independent_133_1", "Independent_133_2": "Independent_133_2", "Independent_133_3": "Independent_133_3", "Independent_133_4": "Independent_133_4", "Independent_133_5": "Independent_133_5", "Independent_134_1": "Independent_134_1", "Independent_134_2": "Independent_134_2", "Independent_134_3": "Independent_134_3", "Independent_134_4": "Independent_134_4", "Independent_135_1": "Independent_135_1", "Independent_135_2": "Independent_135_2", "Independent_135_3": "Independent_135_3", "Independent_135_4": "Independent_135_4", "Independent_136_1": "Independent_136_1", "Independent_136_2": "Independent_136_2", "Independent_136_3": "Independent_136_3", "Independent_136_4": "Independent_136_4", "Independent_136_5": "Independent_136_5", "Independent_137_1": "Independent_137_1", "Independent_137_2": "Independent_137_2", "Independent_137_3": "Independent_137_3", "Independent_138_1": "Independent_138_1", "Independent_138_2": "Independent_138_2", "Independent_138_3": "Independent_138_3", "Independent_139_1": "Independent_139_1", "Independent_139_2": "Independent_139_2", "Independent_139_3": "Independent_139_3", "Independent_139_4": "Independent_139_4", "Independent_139_5": "Independent_139_5", "Independent_139_6": "Independent_139_6", "Independent_139_7": "Independent_139_7", "Independent_139_8": "Independent_139_8", "Independent_139_9": "Independent_139_9", "Independent_139_10": "Independent_139_10", "Independent_140_1": "Independent_140_1", "Independent_140_2": "Independent_140_2", "Independent_140_3": "Independent_140_3", "Independent_140_4": "Independent_140_4", "Independent_140_5": "Independent_140_5", "Independent_140_6": "Independent_140_6", "Independent_140_7": "Independent_140_7", "Independent_141_1": "Independent_141_1", "Independent_141_2": "Independent_141_2", "Independent_141_3": "Independent_141_3", "Independent_141_4": "Independent_141_4", "Independent_141_5": "Independent_141_5", "Independent_142_1": "Independent_142_1", "Independent_142_2": "Independent_142_2", "Independent_142_3": "Independent_142_3", "Independent_142_4": "Independent_142_4", "Independent_142_5": "Independent_142_5", "Independent_142_6": "Independent_142_6", "Independent_142_7": "Independent_142_7", "Independent_143_1": "Independent_143_1", "Independent_143_2": "Independent_143_2", "Independent_143_3": "Independent_143_3", "Independent_143_4": "Independent_143_4", "Indian Labour Party (Ambedkar Phule)": "Indian Labour Party (Ambedkar Phule)", "Independent_144_1": "Independent_144_1", "Independent_144_2": "Independent_144_2", "Independent_144_3": "Independent_144_3", "Independent_144_4": "Independent_144_4", "Independent_145_1": "Independent_145_1", "Independent_145_2": "Independent_145_2", "Independent_145_3": "Independent_145_3", "Independent_145_4": "Independent_145_4", "Independent_145_5": "Independent_145_5", "Independent_145_6": "Independent_145_6", "Independent_146_1": "Independent_146_1", "Independent_146_2": "Independent_146_2", "Independent_147_1": "Independent_147_1", "Independent_147_2": "Independent_147_2", "Independent_148_1": "Independent_148_1", "Independent_148_2": "Independent_148_2", "Independent_148_3": "Independent_148_3", "Independent_148_4": "Independent_148_4", "Independent_148_5": "Independent_148_5", "Independent_148_6": "Independent_148_6", "Independent_148_7": "Independent_148_7", "Independent_148_8": "Independent_148_8", "Independent_148_9": "Independent_148_9", "Independent_148_10": "Independent_148_10", "Independent_149_1": "Independent_149_1", "Independent_149_2": "Independent_149_2", "Independent_149_3": "Independent_149_3", "Independent_149_4": "Independent_149_4", "Independent_149_5": "Independent_149_5", "Independent_149_6": "Independent_149_6", "Independent_149_7": "Independent_149_7", "Independent_149_8": "Independent_149_8", "Independent_150_1": "Independent_150_1", "Independent_150_2": "Independent_150_2", "Independent_150_3": "Independent_150_3", "Independent_150_4": "Independent_150_4", "Independent_150_5": "Independent_150_5", "Independent_150_6": "Independent_150_6", "Independent_150_7": "Independent_150_7", "Independent_150_8": "Independent_150_8", "Independent_150_9": "Independent_150_9", "Independent_150_10": "Independent_150_10", "Independent_151_1": "Independent_151_1", "Independent_151_2": "Independent_151_2", "Independent_152_1": "Independent_152_1", "Independent_152_2": "Independent_152_2", "Independent_152_3": "Independent_152_3", "Independent_152_4": "Independent_152_4", "Independent_152_5": "Independent_152_5", "Independent_153_1": "Independent_153_1", "Independent_153_2": "Independent_153_2", "Independent_153_3": "Independent_153_3", "Young Star Empowerment Party": "Young Star Empowerment Party", "Independent_154_1": "Independent_154_1", "Independent_154_2": "Independent_154_2", "Independent_154_3": "Independent_154_3", "Independent_154_4": "Independent_154_4", "Independent_155_1": "Independent_155_1", "Independent_155_2": "Independent_155_2", "Independent_155_3": "Independent_155_3", "Independent_155_4": "Independent_155_4", "Independent_155_5": "Independent_155_5", "Independent_155_6": "Independent_155_6", "Independent_156_1": "Independent_156_1", "Independent_157_1": "Independent_157_1", "Independent_157_2": "Independent_157_2", "NPP": "NPP", "Independent_158_1": "Independent_158_1", "Independent_158_2": "Independent_158_2", "Indian New Congress Party": "Indian New Congress Party", "Independent_158_3": "Independent_158_3", "Independent_158_4": "Independent_158_4", "Independent_159_1": "Independent_159_1", "Independent_159_2": "Independent_159_2", "Independent_159_3": "Independent_159_3", "Gareeb Aadmi Party": "Gareeb Aadmi Party", "Independent_159_4": "Independent_159_4", "Independent_159_5": "Independent_159_5", "Independent_160_1": "Independent_160_1", "Independent_160_2": "Independent_160_2", "Independent_160_3": "Independent_160_3", "Independent_160_4": "Independent_160_4", "Tipu Sultan Party": "Tipu Sultan Party", "Independent_161_1": "Independent_161_1", "Independent_161_2": "Independent_161_2", "Independent_161_3": "Independent_161_3", "Independent_162_1": "Independent_162_1", "Independent_162_2": "Independent_162_2", "Independent_162_3": "Independent_162_3", "Karnataka Karmikara Paksha": "Karnataka Karmikara Paksha", "Independent_162_4": "Independent_162_4", "Independent_162_5": "Independent_162_5", "Independent_162_6": "Independent_162_6", "Independent_162_7": "Independent_162_7", "Independent_162_8": "Independent_162_8", "Independent_162_9": "Independent_162_9", "Indian Christian Front": "Indian Christian Front", "Independent_163_1": "Independent_163_1", "Independent_164_1": "Independent_164_1", "Independent_164_2": "Independent_164_2", "Independent_164_3": "Independent_164_3", "Independent_164_4": "Independent_164_4", "Independent_165_1": "Independent_165_1", "Independent_165_2": "Independent_165_2", "Independent_165_3": "Independent_165_3", "Independent_165_4": "Independent_165_4", "Independent_165_5": "Independent_165_5", "Independent_165_6": "Independent_165_6", "Independent_165_7": "Independent_165_7", "Independent_165_8": "Independent_165_8", "Independent_166_1": "Independent_166_1", "Independent_166_2": "Independent_166_2", "Independent_166_3": "Independent_166_3", "Independent_166_4": "Independent_166_4", "Independent_166_5": "Independent_166_5", "Independent_166_6": "Independent_166_6", "Independent_167_1": "Independent_167_1", "Independent_167_2": "Independent_167_2", "Independent_167_3": "Independent_167_3", "Independent_167_4": "Independent_167_4", "Independent_167_5": "Independent_167_5", "Independent_167_6": "Independent_167_6", "Independent_167_7": "Independent_167_7", "Independent_168_1": "Independent_168_1", "Navabharath Sena": "Navabharath Sena", "Independent_168_2": "Independent_168_2", "Independent_168_3": "Independent_168_3", "Independent_169_1": "Independent_169_1", "Independent_169_2": "Independent_169_2", "Independent_169_3": "Independent_169_3", "Independent_169_4": "Independent_169_4", "Independent_169_5": "Independent_169_5", "Independent_169_6": "Independent_169_6", "Independent_169_7": "Independent_169_7", "Independent_169_8": "Independent_169_8", "Independent_170_1": "Independent_170_1", "Independent_170_2": "Independent_170_2", "Independent_170_3": "Independent_170_3", "Independent_170_4": "Independent_170_4", "Independent_171_1": "Independent_171_1", "KannadaPaksha": "KannadaPaksha", "Independent_172_1": "Independent_172_1", "Independent_172_2": "Independent_172_2", "Independent_172_3": "Independent_172_3", "Independent_172_4": "Independent_172_4", "Independent_172_5": "Independent_172_5", "Independent_173_1": "Independent_173_1", "Independent_173_2": "Independent_173_2", "Independent_173_3": "Independent_173_3", "Independent_173_4": "Independent_173_4", "Independent_173_5": "Independent_173_5", "Independent_173_6": "Independent_173_6", "Independent_173_7": "Independent_173_7", "Independent_173_8": "Independent_173_8", "Independent_174_1": "Independent_174_1", "Independent_174_2": "Independent_174_2", "Independent_174_3": "Independent_174_3", "Independent_174_4": "Independent_174_4", "Independent_174_5": "Independent_174_5", "Independent_174_6": "Independent_174_6", "Independent_174_7": "Independent_174_7", "Independent_174_8": "Independent_174_8", "Independent_175_1": "Independent_175_1", "Independent_175_2": "Independent_175_2", "Independent_175_3": "Independent_175_3", "Independent_175_4": "Independent_175_4", "Independent_175_5": "Independent_175_5", "Independent_175_6": "Independent_175_6", "Independent_176_1": "Independent_176_1", "Independent_176_2": "Independent_176_2", "Independent_176_3": "Independent_176_3", "Independent_176_4": "Independent_176_4", "Independent_176_5": "Independent_176_5", "Independent_176_6": "Independent_176_6", "Independent_177_1": "Independent_177_1", "Independent_177_2": "Independent_177_2", "Independent_177_3": "Independent_177_3", "Independent_177_4": "Independent_177_4", "Independent_178_1": "Independent_178_1", "Independent_178_2": "Independent_178_2", "Independent_178_3": "Independent_178_3", "Independent_178_4": "Independent_178_4", "Independent_178_5": "Independent_178_5", "Independent_178_6": "Independent_178_6", "Independent_178_7": "Independent_178_7", "Independent_178_8": "Independent_178_8", "Independent_178_9": "Independent_178_9", "Independent_178_10": "Independent_178_10", "Independent_178_11": "Independent_178_11", "Independent_178_12": "Independent_178_12", "Independent_178_13": "Independent_178_13", "Independent_178_14": "Independent_178_14", "Independent_178_15": "Independent_178_15", "Independent_179_1": "Independent_179_1", "Independent_179_2": "Independent_179_2", "Independent_179_3": "Independent_179_3", "Independent_179_4": "Independent_179_4", "Independent_179_5": "Independent_179_5", "Independent_179_6": "Independent_179_6", "Independent_180_1": "Independent_180_1", "Independent_180_2": "Independent_180_2", "Independent_181_1": "Independent_181_1", "Vijaya Janata Party": "Vijaya Janata Party", "Independent_181_2": "Independent_181_2", "Independent_182_1": "Independent_182_1", "Independent_182_2": "Independent_182_2", "Independent_182_3": "Independent_182_3", "Independent_182_4": "Independent_182_4", "Independent_182_5": "Independent_182_5", "Parisara Bandhu Party": "Parisara Bandhu Party", "Independent_183_1": "Independent_183_1", "Independent_183_2": "Independent_183_2", "Independent_184_1": "Independent_184_1", "Independent_184_2": "Independent_184_2", "Independent_184_3": "Independent_184_3", "Independent_184_4": "Independent_184_4", "Independent_184_5": "Independent_184_5", "Independent_184_6": "Independent_184_6", "Independent_185_1": "Independent_185_1", "Independent_185_2": "Independent_185_2", "Independent_185_3": "Independent_185_3", "Independent_185_4": "Independent_185_4", "Independent_185_5": "Independent_185_5", "Independent_186_1": "Independent_186_1", "Independent_186_2": "Independent_186_2", "Independent_186_3": "Independent_186_3", "Independent_186_4": "Independent_186_4", "Independent_186_5": "Independent_186_5", "Independent_186_6": "Independent_186_6", "Independent_186_7": "Independent_186_7", "Independent_187_1": "Independent_187_1", "Independent_187_2": "Independent_187_2", "Independent_187_3": "Independent_187_3", "Independent_187_4": "Independent_187_4", "Independent_188_1": "Independent_188_1", "Independent_188_2": "Independent_188_2", "Independent_188_3": "Independent_188_3", "Independent_188_4": "Independent_188_4", "Independent_189_1": "Independent_189_1", "Independent_189_2": "Independent_189_2", "Independent_189_3": "Independent_189_3", "Independent_189_4": "Independent_189_4", "Independent_189_5": "Independent_189_5", "Independent_189_6": "Independent_189_6", "Independent_190_1": "Independent_190_1", "Independent_190_2": "Independent_190_2", "Independent_190_3": "Independent_190_3", "Independent_190_4": "Independent_190_4", "Independent_190_5": "Independent_190_5", "Independent_190_6": "Independent_190_6", "Independent_190_7": "Independent_190_7", "Independent_190_8": "Independent_190_8", "Independent_190_9": "Independent_190_9", "Independent_191_1": "Independent_191_1", "Independent_191_2": "Independent_191_2", "Independent_191_3": "Independent_191_3", "Independent_191_4": "Independent_191_4", "Independent_191_5": "Independent_191_5", "Independent_191_6": "Independent_191_6", "Independent_192_1": "Independent_192_1", "Independent_193_1": "Independent_193_1", "Independent_193_2": "Independent_193_2", "Purvanchal Mahapanchayat": "Purvanchal Mahapanchayat", "Independent_193_3": "Independent_193_3", "Independent_194_1": "Independent_194_1", "Independent_195_1": "Independent_195_1", "Independent_195_2": "Independent_195_2", "Independent_195_3": "Independent_195_3", "Independent_195_4": "Independent_195_4", "Independent_195_5": "Independent_195_5", "Independent_196_1": "Independent_196_1", "Independent_196_2": "Independent_196_2", "Independent_197_1": "Independent_197_1", "Independent_198_1": "Independent_198_1", "Independent_198_2": "Independent_198_2", "Independent_198_3": "Independent_198_3", "Independent_198_4": "Independent_198_4", "Independent_198_5": "Independent_198_5", "Independent_198_6": "Independent_198_6", "Bharatiya Dr. B.R.Ambedkar Janta Party": "Bharatiya Dr. B.R.Ambedkar Janta Party", "Independent_198_7": "Independent_198_7", "Independent_199_1": "Independent_199_1", "Independent_199_2": "Independent_199_2", "Tuluvere Paksha": "Tuluvere Paksha", "Independent_200_1": "Independent_200_1", "Independent_201_1": "Independent_201_1", "Independent_201_2": "Independent_201_2", "Independent_202_1": "Independent_202_1", "Independent_202_2": "Independent_202_2", "Independent_203_1": "Independent_203_1", "Independent_204_1": "Independent_204_1", "Independent_206_1": "Independent_206_1", "Independent_206_2": "Independent_206_2", "Independent_207_1": "Independent_207_1", "Independent_208_1": "Independent_208_1", "Independent_208_2": "Independent_208_2", "Independent_208_3": "Independent_208_3", "Independent_208_4": "Independent_208_4", "Independent_209_1": "Independent_209_1", "Independent_209_2": "Independent_209_2", "Independent_210_1": "Independent_210_1", "Independent_210_2": "Independent_210_2", "Independent_210_3": "Independent_210_3", "Independent_211_1": "Independent_211_1", "Independent_212_1": "Independent_212_1", "Independent_212_2": "Independent_212_2", "Independent_212_3": "Independent_212_3", "Independent_212_4": "Independent_212_4", "Independent_212_5": "Independent_212_5", "Independent_213_1": "Independent_213_1", "Independent_213_2": "Independent_213_2", "Independent_213_3": "Independent_213_3", "Independent_213_4": "Independent_213_4", "Independent_213_5": "Independent_213_5", "Independent_214_1": "Independent_214_1", "Independent_214_2": "Independent_214_2", "Independent_214_3": "Independent_214_3", "Independent_214_4": "Independent_214_4", "Independent_214_5": "Independent_214_5", "Independent_214_6": "Independent_214_6", "Independent_215_1": "Independent_215_1", "Independent_215_2": "Independent_215_2", "Independent_215_3": "Independent_215_3", "Independent_215_4": "Independent_215_4", "Independent_215_5": "Independent_215_5", "Karnataka Praja Party (RaithaParva)": "Karnataka Praja Party (RaithaParva)", "Independent_215_6": "Independent_215_6", "Independent_216_1": "Independent_216_1", "Independent_216_2": "Independent_216_2", "Independent_216_3": "Independent_216_3", "Independent_216_4": "Independent_216_4", "Independent_216_5": "Independent_216_5", "Independent_216_6": "Independent_216_6", "Independent_216_7": "Independent_216_7", "Independent_216_8": "Independent_216_8", "Independent_217_1": "Independent_217_1", "Independent_217_2": "Independent_217_2", "Independent_217_3": "Independent_217_3", "Independent_217_4": "Independent_217_4", "Independent_217_5": "Independent_217_5", "Independent_218_1": "Independent_218_1", "Independent_218_2": "Independent_218_2", "Independent_218_3": "Independent_218_3", "Independent_218_4": "Independent_218_4", "Independent_218_5": "Independent_218_5", "Independent_218_6": "Independent_218_6", "Independent_218_7": "Independent_218_7", "Independent_219_1": "Independent_219_1", "Independent_219_2": "Independent_219_2", "Independent_219_3": "Independent_219_3", "Independent_219_4": "Independent_219_4", "Independent_220_1": "Independent_220_1", "Independent_220_2": "Independent_220_2", "Independent_221_1": "Independent_221_1", "Independent_221_2": "Independent_221_2", "Independent_221_3": "Independent_221_3", "Independent_221_4": "Independent_221_4", "Independent_221_5": "Independent_221_5", "Independent_221_6": "Independent_221_6", "Independent_221_7": "Independent_221_7", "Independent_222_1": "Independent_222_1", "Independent_222_2": "Independent_222_2", "Independent_222_3": "Independent_222_3", "Independent_222_4": "Independent_222_4", "Kannada Chalavali Vatal Paksha": "Kannada Chalavali Vatal Paksha", "Independent_223_1": "Independent_223_1", "Independent_223_2": "Independent_223_2", "Independent_224_1": "Independent_224_1", "Independent_224_2": "Independent_224_2", "Independent_224_3": "Independent_224_3", "Independent_224_4": "Independent_224_4", "Independent_224_5": "Independent_224_5", "Independent_224_6": "Independent_224_6", "Independent_224_7": "Independent_224_7"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 224, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 224, "registered_not_positive": 224}, "n_stations_flagged": 224, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:29:56.205828", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.374, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.273, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.283, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.205, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.422, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 224}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "52ae70c1bb0d4ab89f3030901c1e7f25", "name": "India 2024 local (overnight india_odisha_2024_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.eci.gov.in/AcResultGenJune2024/ConstituencywiseS181.htm", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AJSU_Party": "AJSU_Party", "Aam_Aadmi_Party": "Aam_Aadmi_Party", "All_India_Forward_Bloc": "All_India_Forward_Bloc", "Ambedkarite_Party_of_India": "Ambedkarite_Party_of_India", "Bahujan_Samaj_Party": "Bahujan_Samaj_Party", "Bharatheeya_Jawan_Kisan_Party": "Bharatheeya_Jawan_Kisan_Party", "Bharatiya_Bikash_Parishad": "Bharatiya_Bikash_Parishad", "Bharatiya_Janata_Party": "Bharatiya_Janata_Party", "Bharatiya_Nyay_Adhikar_Raksha_Party": "Bharatiya_Nyay_Adhikar_Raksha_Party", "Bharatiya_Sampuran_Krantikari_Party": "Bharatiya_Sampuran_Krantikari_Party", "Biju_Janata_Dal": "Biju_Janata_Dal", "Communist_Party_of_India": "Communist_Party_of_India", "Communist_Party_of_India_Marxist": "Communist_Party_of_India_Marxist", "Communist_Party_of_India_Marxist_Leninist_Liberation": "Communist_Party_of_India_Marxist_Leninist_Liberation", "Communist_Party_of_India_Marxist_Leninist_Red_Star": "Communist_Party_of_India_Marxist_Leninist_Red_Star", "Hamar_Raj_Party": "Hamar_Raj_Party", "Independent_100_1__CHITTARANJAN_NAYAK": "Independent_100_1__CHITTARANJAN_NAYAK", "Independent_100_2__RAJAKISHORE_PRADHAN": "Independent_100_2__RAJAKISHORE_PRADHAN", "Independent_101_1__ANOJ_KUMAR_ROUT": "Independent_101_1__ANOJ_KUMAR_ROUT", "Independent_101_2__UMAKANTA_BHARAT": "Independent_101_2__UMAKANTA_BHARAT", "Independent_101_3__KRUPASINDHU_DAS": "Independent_101_3__KRUPASINDHU_DAS", "Independent_102_1__GAGAN_BEHERA": "Independent_102_1__GAGAN_BEHERA", "Independent_102_2__RABINDRA_NATH_SETHY": "Independent_102_2__RABINDRA_NATH_SETHY", "Independent_103_1__RAKESH_KUMAR_BEHERA": "Independent_103_1__RAKESH_KUMAR_BEHERA", "Independent_103_2__SESHADEB_NANDA": "Independent_103_2__SESHADEB_NANDA", "Independent_103_3__SANJEEB_BISWAL": "Independent_103_3__SANJEEB_BISWAL", "Independent_103_4__SASMITA_DAS": "Independent_103_4__SASMITA_DAS", "Independent_103_5__SUBASH_CHANDRA_PARIDA": "Independent_103_5__SUBASH_CHANDRA_PARIDA", "Independent_104_1__NARAYAN_PRASADA_NANDA": "Independent_104_1__NARAYAN_PRASADA_NANDA", "Independent_106_1__ARUN_SAHOO": "Independent_106_1__ARUN_SAHOO", "Independent_106_2__ROSALEEN_NAYAK": "Independent_106_2__ROSALEEN_NAYAK", "Independent_106_3__ROJALIN_PRADHAN": "Independent_106_3__ROJALIN_PRADHAN", "Independent_107_1__CHITTA_RANJAN_SAHOO": "Independent_107_1__CHITTA_RANJAN_SAHOO", "Independent_107_2__DEBAKI_NANDAN_DASH": "Independent_107_2__DEBAKI_NANDAN_DASH", "Independent_107_3__SANTOSH_KUMAR_MALLICK": "Independent_107_3__SANTOSH_KUMAR_MALLICK", "Independent_107_4__SUJIT_MOHAPATRA": "Independent_107_4__SUJIT_MOHAPATRA", "Independent_107_5__SMITA_MOHANTY": "Independent_107_5__SMITA_MOHANTY", "Independent_107_6__HAREKRUSHNA_SINGHARI": "Independent_107_6__HAREKRUSHNA_SINGHARI", "Independent_108_1__PRAVAKAR_DALAI": "Independent_108_1__PRAVAKAR_DALAI", "Independent_108_2__BIHARI_BANDHU_PALAI": "Independent_108_2__BIHARI_BANDHU_PALAI", "Independent_108_3__RABI_NARAYAN_SWAIN": "Independent_108_3__RABI_NARAYAN_SWAIN", "Independent_108_4__SUKANTA_GHADAI": "Independent_108_4__SUKANTA_GHADAI", "Independent_109_1__KAMAKSHYA_PRASAD_PRADHAN": "Independent_109_1__KAMAKSHYA_PRASAD_PRADHAN", "Independent_109_2__KAILASH_CHANDRA_PRADHAN": "Independent_109_2__KAILASH_CHANDRA_PRADHAN", "Independent_109_3__DEBI_PRASAD_JENA": "Independent_109_3__DEBI_PRASAD_JENA", "Independent_109_4__SATYABADI_RADHAMOHAN_BIS": "Independent_109_4__SATYABADI_RADHAMOHAN_BIS", "Independent_10_1__ANILA_DHANWAR": "Independent_10_1__ANILA_DHANWAR", "Independent_10_2__DABIT_KUMAR_LUGUN": "Independent_10_2__DABIT_KUMAR_LUGUN", "Independent_10_3__DAUD_BURH": "Independent_10_3__DAUD_BURH", "Independent_10_4__PRASAN_KUMARI_KULLU": "Independent_10_4__PRASAN_KUMARI_KULLU", "Independent_10_5__MAHAGODEVI_KOILI_BHAGAT": "Independent_10_5__MAHAGODEVI_KOILI_BHAGAT", "Independent_10_6__RAJESH_KERKETTA": "Independent_10_6__RAJESH_KERKETTA", "Independent_10_7__SUJIT_DUNGDUNG": "Independent_10_7__SUJIT_DUNGDUNG", "Independent_10_8__LAXMAN_TIRKEY": "Independent_10_8__LAXMAN_TIRKEY", "Independent_110_1__YUDHISTIR_SWAIN": "Independent_110_1__YUDHISTIR_SWAIN", "Independent_110_2__RADHA_MOHAN": "Independent_110_2__RADHA_MOHAN", "Independent_110_3__SUBHRANSU_KUMAR_MALLICK": "Independent_110_3__SUBHRANSU_KUMAR_MALLICK", "Independent_111_1__KANHU_CHARAN_KHATUA": "Independent_111_1__KANHU_CHARAN_KHATUA", "Independent_111_2__SATYA_PRIYA_BEHERA": "Independent_111_2__SATYA_PRIYA_BEHERA", "Independent_111_3__LOKANATH_BEHERA": "Independent_111_3__LOKANATH_BEHERA", "Independent_112_1__DR_AKSHAYA_KUMAR_BARIK": "Independent_112_1__DR_AKSHAYA_KUMAR_BARIK", "Independent_112_2__KISHAN_KUMAR_BALODIA": "Independent_112_2__KISHAN_KUMAR_BALODIA", "Independent_112_3__SANATAN_BEHERA": "Independent_112_3__SANATAN_BEHERA", "Independent_113_1__DIMIROO_MAJHI": "Independent_113_1__DIMIROO_MAJHI", "Independent_113_2__PRATAP_KISHOR_BARIK": "Independent_113_2__PRATAP_KISHOR_BARIK", "Independent_113_3__BIBHUTI_BHUSAN_SWAIN": "Independent_113_3__BIBHUTI_BHUSAN_SWAIN", "Independent_113_4__BYOMAKESH_TRIPATHY": "Independent_113_4__BYOMAKESH_TRIPATHY", "Independent_113_5__SRINIBAS_KHANDAI": "Independent_113_5__SRINIBAS_KHANDAI", "Independent_114_1__GYANENDRA_MOHANTY": "Independent_114_1__GYANENDRA_MOHANTY", "Independent_114_2__PRABIN_KUMAR_NAYAK": "Independent_114_2__PRABIN_KUMAR_NAYAK", "Independent_115_1__PRASANTA_KUMAR_SAHOO": "Independent_115_1__PRASANTA_KUMAR_SAHOO", "Independent_115_2__MANOJ_KUMAR_PRADHAN": "Independent_115_2__MANOJ_KUMAR_PRADHAN", "Independent_115_3__MD_MANWAR_ALLI": "Independent_115_3__MD_MANWAR_ALLI", "Independent_115_4__SUJIT_KUMAR_BALABANTARAY": "Independent_115_4__SUJIT_KUMAR_BALABANTARAY", "Independent_116_1__JANARDAN_DALABEHERA": "Independent_116_1__JANARDAN_DALABEHERA", "Independent_116_2__PRADEEP_KUMAR_SAHOO_S_O_": "Independent_116_2__PRADEEP_KUMAR_SAHOO_S_O_", "Independent_116_3__MANOJ_KUMAR_PRADHAN": "Independent_116_3__MANOJ_KUMAR_PRADHAN", "Independent_116_4__SUBHAKANTA_KHADIRATNA": "Independent_116_4__SUBHAKANTA_KHADIRATNA", "Independent_116_5__SANTOSH_KUMAR_SAHOO": "Independent_116_5__SANTOSH_KUMAR_SAHOO", "Independent_117_1__KALU_CHARAN_KHANDEITARAY": "Independent_117_1__KALU_CHARAN_KHANDEITARAY", "Independent_117_2__RANJIT_MOHAPATRA": "Independent_117_2__RANJIT_MOHAPATRA", "Independent_117_3__RUPESH_KUMAR_BEHERA": "Independent_117_3__RUPESH_KUMAR_BEHERA", "Independent_118_1__MANMATH_KUMAR_SINGH": "Independent_118_1__MANMATH_KUMAR_SINGH", "Independent_118_2__SAKTIPADA_NATH": "Independent_118_2__SAKTIPADA_NATH", "Independent_118_3__SUBRAT_KUMAR_HABADASINGH": "Independent_118_3__SUBRAT_KUMAR_HABADASINGH", "Independent_119_1__SANTOSH_KUMAR_SAHOO": "Independent_119_1__SANTOSH_KUMAR_SAHOO", "Independent_119_2__HULAS_BARIK": "Independent_119_2__HULAS_BARIK", "Independent_11_1__BISWAKARMA_BAG": "Independent_11_1__BISWAKARMA_BAG", "Independent_120_1__ANUBHAV_PATNAIK": "Independent_120_1__ANUBHAV_PATNAIK", "Independent_120_2__JITENDRA_BEHERA": "Independent_120_2__JITENDRA_BEHERA", "Independent_120_3__MALLI_BEHERA": "Independent_120_3__MALLI_BEHERA", "Independent_120_4__SIBA_NARAYAN_MOHANTY": "Independent_120_4__SIBA_NARAYAN_MOHANTY", "Independent_120_5__LOPAMUDRA_SARANGI": "Independent_120_5__LOPAMUDRA_SARANGI", "Independent_121_1__INDUMATI_NAYAK": "Independent_121_1__INDUMATI_NAYAK", "Independent_121_2__KANHU_CHARAN_NAYAK": "Independent_121_2__KANHU_CHARAN_NAYAK", "Independent_121_3__RABINDRA_SETHI": "Independent_121_3__RABINDRA_SETHI", "Independent_121_4__SURATHA_NAIK": "Independent_121_4__SURATHA_NAIK", "Independent_122_1__SANTOSH_NARAYAN": "Independent_122_1__SANTOSH_NARAYAN", "Independent_122_2__HEMANT_KUMAR_PRUSTY": "Independent_122_2__HEMANT_KUMAR_PRUSTY", "Independent_123_1__PANCHANAN_DAS": "Independent_123_1__PANCHANAN_DAS", "Independent_123_2__SUNITA_BEHERA": "Independent_123_2__SUNITA_BEHERA", "Independent_124_1__AKSHYA_KUMAR_ROUT": "Independent_124_1__AKSHYA_KUMAR_ROUT", "Independent_124_2__JAGANNATH_SAMAL": "Independent_124_2__JAGANNATH_SAMAL", "Independent_124_3__NARAYAN_SAHU": "Independent_124_3__NARAYAN_SAHU", "Independent_124_4__NIRAKARA_NAYAK": "Independent_124_4__NIRAKARA_NAYAK", "Independent_124_5__RAJIB_KUMAR_JENA": "Independent_124_5__RAJIB_KUMAR_JENA", "Independent_125_1__ABANI_KANTA_BADAJENA": "Independent_125_1__ABANI_KANTA_BADAJENA", "Independent_125_2__ARUNA_KUMAR_BISOYI": "Independent_125_2__ARUNA_KUMAR_BISOYI", "Independent_125_3__K_RAMESH_DORA": "Independent_125_3__K_RAMESH_DORA", "Independent_125_4__SANJAYA_KUMAR_BEHERA": "Independent_125_4__SANJAYA_KUMAR_BEHERA", "Independent_127_1__CH_MAMINI": "Independent_127_1__CH_MAMINI", "Independent_127_2__SAMRAT_RAJ": "Independent_127_2__SAMRAT_RAJ", "Independent_127_3__SAROJ_KUMAR_BEHERA": "Independent_127_3__SAROJ_KUMAR_BEHERA", "Independent_128_1__DIGAMBAR_BEHERA": "Independent_128_1__DIGAMBAR_BEHERA", "Independent_129_1__ANIL_KUMAR_PATHI": "Independent_129_1__ANIL_KUMAR_PATHI", "Independent_129_2__ABANI_KUMAR_GAYA": "Independent_129_2__ABANI_KUMAR_GAYA", "Independent_129_3__SUDHANSU_SEKHAR_GOUDA": "Independent_129_3__SUDHANSU_SEKHAR_GOUDA", "Independent_12_1__THOMAS_BARTHOLOMIO_DUNGD": "Independent_12_1__THOMAS_BARTHOLOMIO_DUNGD", "Independent_12_2__DHRUBA_CHARAN_BEHERA": "Independent_12_2__DHRUBA_CHARAN_BEHERA", "Independent_12_3__NIHAR_RAY": "Independent_12_3__NIHAR_RAY", "Independent_12_4__BISWANATH_LAKRA": "Independent_12_4__BISWANATH_LAKRA", "Independent_131_1__AKSHAYA_KUMAR": "Independent_131_1__AKSHAYA_KUMAR", "Independent_131_2__RAM_NARAYANA_BISWASARAY": "Independent_131_2__RAM_NARAYANA_BISWASARAY", "Independent_131_3__SABITA_KUMARI_SAHU": "Independent_131_3__SABITA_KUMARI_SAHU", "Independent_131_4__S_LAKSHMI_ACHARI": "Independent_131_4__S_LAKSHMI_ACHARI", "Independent_132_1__DR_T_PADMAVATI": "Independent_132_1__DR_T_PADMAVATI", "Independent_132_2__MANORANJAN_SAHU": "Independent_132_2__MANORANJAN_SAHU", "Independent_133_1__JEEBANO_PATRO": "Independent_133_1__JEEBANO_PATRO", "Independent_133_2__JHASAKETAN_PADHY": "Independent_133_2__JHASAKETAN_PADHY", "Independent_133_3__BISHNU_CHARANA_RANA": "Independent_133_3__BISHNU_CHARANA_RANA", "Independent_133_4__BRAHMA_NANDA_TRIPATHY": "Independent_133_4__BRAHMA_NANDA_TRIPATHY", "Independent_133_5__MANOJ_PATTNAIK": "Independent_133_5__MANOJ_PATTNAIK", "Independent_133_6__SIVA_SHANKAR_DASH": "Independent_133_6__SIVA_SHANKAR_DASH", "Independent_133_7__SARITA_PANDA": "Independent_133_7__SARITA_PANDA", "Independent_133_8__LAXMANA_MAHARANA": "Independent_133_8__LAXMANA_MAHARANA", "Independent_134_1__KANHU_CHARAN_PATRA": "Independent_134_1__KANHU_CHARAN_PATRA", "Independent_134_2__KUNA_DAS": "Independent_134_2__KUNA_DAS", "Independent_134_3__JAYARAM_RAUTO": "Independent_134_3__JAYARAM_RAUTO", "Independent_134_4__BRUNDABAN_KHATAI": "Independent_134_4__BRUNDABAN_KHATAI", "Independent_134_5__JAMUNA_BEHERA": "Independent_134_5__JAMUNA_BEHERA", "Independent_134_6__SIMANCHAL_DAKUA": "Independent_134_6__SIMANCHAL_DAKUA", "Independent_134_7__SUKANTA_KISHORE_PANDA": "Independent_134_7__SUKANTA_KISHORE_PANDA", "Independent_135_1__S_RENUKESHWARA_RAO": "Independent_135_1__S_RENUKESHWARA_RAO", "Independent_135_2__SURENDRA_MANDAL": "Independent_135_2__SURENDRA_MANDAL", "Independent_136_1__DANDASI_KHANDUAL": "Independent_136_1__DANDASI_KHANDUAL", "Independent_136_2__MAJESH_DALABEHERA": "Independent_136_2__MAJESH_DALABEHERA", "Independent_136_3__RUBEN_MANDAL": "Independent_136_3__RUBEN_MANDAL", "Independent_137_1__AMODH_KUMAR_BARDHAN": "Independent_137_1__AMODH_KUMAR_BARDHAN", "Independent_137_2__BIKASH_CHANDRA_SINGH": "Independent_137_2__BIKASH_CHANDRA_SINGH", "Independent_137_3__BIDYADHARA_MOHANKUDO": "Independent_137_3__BIDYADHARA_MOHANKUDO", "Independent_137_4__SANJAY_KUMAR_RAUT": "Independent_137_4__SANJAY_KUMAR_RAUT", "Independent_138_1__NAGABHUSAN_MANDANGI": "Independent_138_1__NAGABHUSAN_MANDANGI", "Independent_138_2__PHALGUNI_SABAR": "Independent_138_2__PHALGUNI_SABAR", "Independent_138_3__BHASKAR_JAGERANGA": "Independent_138_3__BHASKAR_JAGERANGA", "Independent_138_4__RABI_SHANKAR_GAMANGA": "Independent_138_4__RABI_SHANKAR_GAMANGA", "Independent_138_5__RASMITA_KUMARI_SABAR": "Independent_138_5__RASMITA_KUMARI_SABAR", "Independent_139_1__NILAMADHAB_ULAKA": "Independent_139_1__NILAMADHAB_ULAKA", "Independent_139_2__PARAMANANDA_HUIKA": "Independent_139_2__PARAMANANDA_HUIKA", "Independent_13_1__GREGORY_MINZ": "Independent_13_1__GREGORY_MINZ", "Independent_140_1__BHAGABAN_MAJHI": "Independent_140_1__BHAGABAN_MAJHI", "Independent_140_2__RANGARAO_KANDAGARI": "Independent_140_2__RANGARAO_KANDAGARI", "Independent_140_3__SUCHITRA_MAJHI": "Independent_140_3__SUCHITRA_MAJHI", "Independent_141_1__NARI_HIKAKA": "Independent_141_1__NARI_HIKAKA", "Independent_141_2__PURNA_MANDINGI": "Independent_141_2__PURNA_MANDINGI", "Independent_141_3__MALITI_TADINGI": "Independent_141_3__MALITI_TADINGI", "Independent_141_4__HABIKA_RABI": "Independent_141_4__HABIKA_RABI", "Independent_142_1__RAM_KRUSHNA_PUJARI": "Independent_142_1__RAM_KRUSHNA_PUJARI", "Independent_143_1__NAMITA_KHORA": "Independent_143_1__NAMITA_KHORA", "Independent_143_2__PRITISH_PATNAIK": "Independent_143_2__PRITISH_PATNAIK", "Independent_143_3__BASANT_PATRA": "Independent_143_3__BASANT_PATRA", "Independent_143_4__MAHENDRA_KUMAR_PATRA": "Independent_143_4__MAHENDRA_KUMAR_PATRA", "Independent_143_5__SIMANCHAL_MOHANKUDO": "Independent_143_5__SIMANCHAL_MOHANKUDO", "Independent_144_1__BHAGIRATHI_PATNIA": "Independent_144_1__BHAGIRATHI_PATNIA", "Independent_144_2__BHUBAN_KHORA": "Independent_144_2__BHUBAN_KHORA", "Independent_144_3__RANJAN_KUMAR_KHORA": "Independent_144_3__RANJAN_KUMAR_KHORA", "Independent_144_4__SIBA_PRASAD_SAGADIA": "Independent_144_4__SIBA_PRASAD_SAGADIA", "Independent_145_1__AMBIKA_KUMARI_PANGI": "Independent_145_1__AMBIKA_KUMARI_PANGI", "Independent_145_2__GANGAMMA_MAJHI": "Independent_145_2__GANGAMMA_MAJHI", "Independent_145_3__PHULOMANI_PANGI": "Independent_145_3__PHULOMANI_PANGI", "Independent_146_1__DULLA_MADKAMI": "Independent_146_1__DULLA_MADKAMI", "Independent_146_2__LALIT_NARAYAN_MADKAMI": "Independent_146_2__LALIT_NARAYAN_MADKAMI", "Independent_147_1__PADIA_PADIAMI": "Independent_147_1__PADIA_PADIAMI", "Independent_14_1__ASHOK_KUMAR_LOHAR": "Independent_14_1__ASHOK_KUMAR_LOHAR", "Independent_14_2__GOPINATH_KISAN": "Independent_14_2__GOPINATH_KISAN", "Independent_14_3__BAJI_KISAN": "Independent_14_3__BAJI_KISAN", "Independent_14_4__MANAI_MUNDA": "Independent_14_4__MANAI_MUNDA", "Independent_14_5__MANGA_ORAM": "Independent_14_5__MANGA_ORAM", "Independent_15_1__MISS_MINAKSHEE_MAJHEE": "Independent_15_1__MISS_MINAKSHEE_MAJHEE", "Independent_16_1__BASUDEB_SUNANI": "Independent_16_1__BASUDEB_SUNANI", "Independent_16_2__SUSHANTA_KUMAR_DANSANA": "Independent_16_2__SUSHANTA_KUMAR_DANSANA", "Independent_16_3__LANKESH_RAVAN": "Independent_16_3__LANKESH_RAVAN", "Independent_17_1__PRABHAS_PRUSETH": "Independent_17_1__PRABHAS_PRUSETH", "Independent_17_2__MAHESH_SHARMA": "Independent_17_2__MAHESH_SHARMA", "Independent_17_3__RAM_KRISHANA_SHASHINI": "Independent_17_3__RAM_KRISHANA_SHASHINI", "Independent_18_1__ASHRAYA_MAHANANDA": "Independent_18_1__ASHRAYA_MAHANANDA", "Independent_18_2__SANJIT_KUMAR_BABANGA": "Independent_18_2__SANJIT_KUMAR_BABANGA", "Independent_19_1__JYOTI_JULIAN_LAKRA": "Independent_19_1__JYOTI_JULIAN_LAKRA", "Independent_19_2__NIRAKARA_PRADHAN": "Independent_19_2__NIRAKARA_PRADHAN", "Independent_19_3__PRAMOD_KUMAR_JHANKAR": "Independent_19_3__PRAMOD_KUMAR_JHANKAR", "Independent_19_4__SHRIMANTA_SAHU": "Independent_19_4__SHRIMANTA_SAHU", "Independent_1_1__GANGADHAR_SAHA": "Independent_1_1__GANGADHAR_SAHA", "Independent_1_2__REBATI_GIRI": "Independent_1_2__REBATI_GIRI", "Independent_20_1__AJAY_KUMAR_NAYAK": "Independent_20_1__AJAY_KUMAR_NAYAK", "Independent_21_1__GYANALOK_PANDA": "Independent_21_1__GYANALOK_PANDA", "Independent_21_2__DEBENDRA_NATH_SWAIN": "Independent_21_2__DEBENDRA_NATH_SWAIN", "Independent_21_3__NARENDRA_NATH_NAYAK": "Independent_21_3__NARENDRA_NATH_NAYAK", "Independent_21_4__PRAMILA_HASDA": "Independent_21_4__PRAMILA_HASDA", "Independent_21_5__SOUMYA_RANJAN_PATNAIK": "Independent_21_5__SOUMYA_RANJAN_PATNAIK", "Independent_22_1__JHANSIRANI_DAS": "Independent_22_1__JHANSIRANI_DAS", "Independent_22_2__BISWANATH_PRATAP_JENA": "Independent_22_2__BISWANATH_PRATAP_JENA", "Independent_23_1__ANIRUDHA_NAIK": "Independent_23_1__ANIRUDHA_NAIK", "Independent_23_2__DUTTA_MUNDA": "Independent_23_2__DUTTA_MUNDA", "Independent_23_3__DEEPAK_KUMAR_NAYAK": "Independent_23_3__DEEPAK_KUMAR_NAYAK", "Independent_23_4__LOKANATH_NAIK": "Independent_23_4__LOKANATH_NAIK", "Independent_24_1__JEEVAN_SINGH_MUNDA": "Independent_24_1__JEEVAN_SINGH_MUNDA", "Independent_24_2__JHARANA_NAIK": "Independent_24_2__JHARANA_NAIK", "Independent_24_3__RAJ_KISHORE_MUNDA": "Independent_24_3__RAJ_KISHORE_MUNDA", "Independent_24_4__SASMITARANI_SINGH": "Independent_24_4__SASMITARANI_SINGH", "Independent_25_1__GURUBUX_SINGH_AHLUWALIA": "Independent_25_1__GURUBUX_SINGH_AHLUWALIA", "Independent_25_2__JAKRIASH_KISPATTA": "Independent_25_2__JAKRIASH_KISPATTA", "Independent_25_3__BASAMATI_MUNDA": "Independent_25_3__BASAMATI_MUNDA", "Independent_25_4__BENUDHAR_MAHANTA": "Independent_25_4__BENUDHAR_MAHANTA", "Independent_25_5__SANTOSH_KUMAR_MAHAPATRA": "Independent_25_5__SANTOSH_KUMAR_MAHAPATRA", "Independent_25_6__KSHIROD_KUMAR_GIRI": "Independent_25_6__KSHIROD_KUMAR_GIRI", "Independent_26_1__MAINA_BESHRA": "Independent_26_1__MAINA_BESHRA", "Independent_26_2__CAPTAIN_DEBANANDA_PINGUA": "Independent_26_2__CAPTAIN_DEBANANDA_PINGUA", "Independent_26_3__JOGENDRA_NATH_PURTY": "Independent_26_3__JOGENDRA_NATH_PURTY", "Independent_26_4__NABA_KISHORE_TUDU": "Independent_26_4__NABA_KISHORE_TUDU", "Independent_27_1__CHEKAR_MAHALI": "Independent_27_1__CHEKAR_MAHALI", "Independent_27_2__BASANTI_TUDU": "Independent_27_2__BASANTI_TUDU", "Independent_27_3__RAISEN_SOREN": "Independent_27_3__RAISEN_SOREN", "Independent_27_4__SANKAR_NAIK": "Independent_27_4__SANKAR_NAIK", "Independent_27_5__SAHADEV_BESHRA": "Independent_27_5__SAHADEV_BESHRA", "Independent_28_1__NARAYAN_MURMU": "Independent_28_1__NARAYAN_MURMU", "Independent_28_2__PRAHLAD_PURTY": "Independent_28_2__PRAHLAD_PURTY", "Independent_28_3__MINATI_HANSDAH": "Independent_28_3__MINATI_HANSDAH", "Independent_28_4__SALKHU_LEMBHA_MAJHI": "Independent_28_4__SALKHU_LEMBHA_MAJHI", "Independent_28_5__SUNARAM_HEMBRAM": "Independent_28_5__SUNARAM_HEMBRAM", "Independent_29_1__KANHU_CHARAN_SINGH": "Independent_29_1__KANHU_CHARAN_SINGH", "Independent_29_2__GAURI_NAIK": "Independent_29_2__GAURI_NAIK", "Independent_29_3__BHARAT_CHANDRA_SINGH": "Independent_29_3__BHARAT_CHANDRA_SINGH", "Independent_29_4__MAHAN_HEMBRAM": "Independent_29_4__MAHAN_HEMBRAM", "Independent_29_5__RANJITA_HEMBRAM": "Independent_29_5__RANJITA_HEMBRAM", "Independent_29_6__SINGHRAI_MARNDI": "Independent_29_6__SINGHRAI_MARNDI", "Independent_29_7__SURENDRANATH_HANSDAH": "Independent_29_7__SURENDRANATH_HANSDAH", "Independent_30_1__DHRUBA_CHARAN_MAJHI": "Independent_30_1__DHRUBA_CHARAN_MAJHI", "Independent_30_2__PITHA_MARNDI": "Independent_30_2__PITHA_MARNDI", "Independent_30_3__BIJAY_KUMAR_NAIK": "Independent_30_3__BIJAY_KUMAR_NAIK", "Independent_30_4__MOHANLAL_SOY": "Independent_30_4__MOHANLAL_SOY", "Independent_30_5__JUGAL_NAIK": "Independent_30_5__JUGAL_NAIK", "Independent_31_1__KALLOL_KUMAR_SINGH": "Independent_31_1__KALLOL_KUMAR_SINGH", "Independent_31_2__KALI_CHARAN_PATRA": "Independent_31_2__KALI_CHARAN_PATRA", "Independent_31_3__BENUDHAR_MOHAPATRA": "Independent_31_3__BENUDHAR_MOHAPATRA", "Independent_31_4__MEENAKSHI_MURMU": "Independent_31_4__MEENAKSHI_MURMU", "Independent_31_5__RABINDRANATH_TUDU": "Independent_31_5__RABINDRANATH_TUDU", "Independent_31_6__RAIMANI_BISWAL": "Independent_31_6__RAIMANI_BISWAL", "Independent_31_7__RAJKISHORE_MARNDI": "Independent_31_7__RAJKISHORE_MARNDI", "Independent_32_1__ANJANA_BEHERA": "Independent_32_1__ANJANA_BEHERA", "Independent_32_2__JAYANTI_PATRA": "Independent_32_2__JAYANTI_PATRA", "Independent_32_3__JITENDRA_PATRA": "Independent_32_3__JITENDRA_PATRA", "Independent_32_4__MANAS_RANJAN_BEHERA": "Independent_32_4__MANAS_RANJAN_BEHERA", "Independent_33_1__DURGA_CHARAN_SING": "Independent_33_1__DURGA_CHARAN_SING", "Independent_33_2__NANARAM_MURMU": "Independent_33_2__NANARAM_MURMU", "Independent_33_3__RUHYA_SINGH": "Independent_33_3__RUHYA_SINGH", "Independent_34_1__GOPABANDHU_MOHANTA": "Independent_34_1__GOPABANDHU_MOHANTA", "Independent_34_2__DIBRAT_CHANDRA_MOHANTA": "Independent_34_2__DIBRAT_CHANDRA_MOHANTA", "Independent_34_3__MADAN_MOHAN_MURMU": "Independent_34_3__MADAN_MOHAN_MURMU", "Independent_34_4__SANJEEB_ROUT": "Independent_34_4__SANJEEB_ROUT", "Independent_34_5__SUDAM_SOREN": "Independent_34_5__SUDAM_SOREN", "Independent_35_1__DIBYAKAM_MOHANTY": "Independent_35_1__DIBYAKAM_MOHANTY", "Independent_35_2__PURNA_CHANDRA_SINGH": "Independent_35_2__PURNA_CHANDRA_SINGH", "Independent_35_3__RAMAKANTA_JENA": "Independent_35_3__RAMAKANTA_JENA", "Independent_36_1__ASIT_KUMAR_CHAND": "Independent_36_1__ASIT_KUMAR_CHAND", "Independent_37_1__JAYAKRUSHNA_ROUT": "Independent_37_1__JAYAKRUSHNA_ROUT", "Independent_37_2__JAYANTI_DASH": "Independent_37_2__JAYANTI_DASH", "Independent_37_3__JYOTSHNA_MOHANTY": "Independent_37_3__JYOTSHNA_MOHANTY", "Independent_37_4__JHARANARANI_JENA": "Independent_37_4__JHARANARANI_JENA", "Independent_38_1__GOPAL_KHANDELWAL": "Independent_38_1__GOPAL_KHANDELWAL", "Independent_38_2__BIKRAM_KESHARI_PANDA": "Independent_38_2__BIKRAM_KESHARI_PANDA", "Independent_39_1__BIJAY_KUMAR_SETHI": "Independent_39_1__BIJAY_KUMAR_SETHI", "Independent_39_2__SUDHANSU_SEKHAR_PARIDA": "Independent_39_2__SUDHANSU_SEKHAR_PARIDA", "Independent_3_1__NANDA_NANDAN_MAHANANDA": "Independent_3_1__NANDA_NANDAN_MAHANANDA", "Independent_3_2__PANDABA_KARNA": "Independent_3_2__PANDABA_KARNA", "Independent_3_3__BHAKTA_BINOD_BABA": "Independent_3_3__BHAKTA_BINOD_BABA", "Independent_41_1__AKSHAY_KUMAR_JENA": "Independent_41_1__AKSHAY_KUMAR_JENA", "Independent_41_2__KASHINATH_DAS": "Independent_41_2__KASHINATH_DAS", "Independent_41_3__RAKESH_KUMAR_MALIK": "Independent_41_3__RAKESH_KUMAR_MALIK", "Independent_41_4__SHIBANI_SHANKAR_RAY": "Independent_41_4__SHIBANI_SHANKAR_RAY", "Independent_42_1__SABITARANI_PAKAL": "Independent_42_1__SABITARANI_PAKAL", "Independent_43_1__UTKAL_KESHARI_BISWAL": "Independent_43_1__UTKAL_KESHARI_BISWAL", "Independent_43_2__PRASANT_KUMAR_BEHERA": "Independent_43_2__PRASANT_KUMAR_BEHERA", "Independent_43_3__SATYARANJAN_NAYAK": "Independent_43_3__SATYARANJAN_NAYAK", "Independent_43_4__SANTOSH_KUMAR_PEREI": "Independent_43_4__SANTOSH_KUMAR_PEREI", "Independent_44_1__CHITTA_RANJAN_SINGH": "Independent_44_1__CHITTA_RANJAN_SINGH", "Independent_44_2__MAHENDRA_TIADI": "Independent_44_2__MAHENDRA_TIADI", "Independent_44_3__RAJENDRA_SAHOO": "Independent_44_3__RAJENDRA_SAHOO", "Independent_44_4__SONAM_BIBI": "Independent_44_4__SONAM_BIBI", "Independent_45_1__BIRENDRA_SHIAL": "Independent_45_1__BIRENDRA_SHIAL", "Independent_45_2__MANAS_RANJAN_JENA": "Independent_45_2__MANAS_RANJAN_JENA", "Independent_45_3__LAXMIKANTA_PARIDA": "Independent_45_3__LAXMIKANTA_PARIDA", "Independent_46_1__JAGANNATH_MALLIK": "Independent_46_1__JAGANNATH_MALLIK", "Independent_46_2__PRASHANA_KUMAR_DAS": "Independent_46_2__PRASHANA_KUMAR_DAS", "Independent_46_3__SANJAY_KUMAR_DAS": "Independent_46_3__SANJAY_KUMAR_DAS", "Independent_46_4__SAROJ_KUMAR_SETHY": "Independent_46_4__SAROJ_KUMAR_SETHY", "Independent_47_1__JEEBAN_SANGRAM_MISHRA": "Independent_47_1__JEEBAN_SANGRAM_MISHRA", "Independent_47_2__PRAKASH_NAYAK": "Independent_47_2__PRAKASH_NAYAK", "Independent_47_3__PRASANTA_KUMAR_MOHANTY": "Independent_47_3__PRASANTA_KUMAR_MOHANTY", "Independent_47_4__BIKASH_CHANDRA_SAHOO": "Independent_47_4__BIKASH_CHANDRA_SAHOO", "Independent_49_1__KABIR_DAS": "Independent_49_1__KABIR_DAS", "Independent_49_2__NIMAIN_CHARAN_RAY": "Independent_49_2__NIMAIN_CHARAN_RAY", "Independent_50_1__AJAYA_ANURAG_MOHANTY": "Independent_50_1__AJAYA_ANURAG_MOHANTY", "Independent_50_2__TARANI_MALIK": "Independent_50_2__TARANI_MALIK", "Independent_50_3__MANORANJAN_JENA": "Independent_50_3__MANORANJAN_JENA", "Independent_51_1__PURUSOTTAM_BEHERA": "Independent_51_1__PURUSOTTAM_BEHERA", "Independent_51_2__SATISH_KUMAR_BISWAL": "Independent_51_2__SATISH_KUMAR_BISWAL", "Independent_51_3__HIMANSHU_SEKHAR_SAHOO_F_": "Independent_51_3__HIMANSHU_SEKHAR_SAHOO_F_", "Independent_51_4__HIMANSU_SEKHAR_SAHOO_F_S": "Independent_51_4__HIMANSU_SEKHAR_SAHOO_F_S", "Independent_51_5__LALUPRASAD_KADAM": "Independent_51_5__LALUPRASAD_KADAM", "Independent_52_1__DEBA_PRAKASH_MOHANTY": "Independent_52_1__DEBA_PRAKASH_MOHANTY", "Independent_53_1__BINOD_BIHARI_JENA": "Independent_53_1__BINOD_BIHARI_JENA", "Independent_53_2__MANOJ_KUMAR_PANDA": "Independent_53_2__MANOJ_KUMAR_PANDA", "Independent_53_3__RAMACHANDRA_BARIK": "Independent_53_3__RAMACHANDRA_BARIK", "Independent_53_4__SAHADEV_JENA": "Independent_53_4__SAHADEV_JENA", "Independent_54_1__Kulamani_Patra": "Independent_54_1__Kulamani_Patra", "Independent_54_2__Gunamani_Shaw": "Independent_54_2__Gunamani_Shaw", "Independent_54_3__RANAJIT_KUMAR_JAMUDA": "Independent_54_3__RANAJIT_KUMAR_JAMUDA", "Independent_54_4__RAKHAL_PARIDA": "Independent_54_4__RAKHAL_PARIDA", "Independent_54_5__SANDEEP_CHAKRA": "Independent_54_5__SANDEEP_CHAKRA", "Independent_55_1__UTTAM_MOHANTY": "Independent_55_1__UTTAM_MOHANTY", "Independent_55_2__BIKASH_NAYAK": "Independent_55_2__BIKASH_NAYAK", "Independent_55_3__MEGHANADA_NANDA": "Independent_55_3__MEGHANADA_NANDA", "Independent_56_1__KAILASH_NAIK": "Independent_56_1__KAILASH_NAIK", "Independent_56_2__JYOTSNA_MAYEE_BEHERA": "Independent_56_2__JYOTSNA_MAYEE_BEHERA", "Independent_57_1__PARAMANANDA_BEHERA": "Independent_57_1__PARAMANANDA_BEHERA", "Independent_57_2__PRASANTA_KUMAR_SETHY": "Independent_57_2__PRASANTA_KUMAR_SETHY", "Independent_57_3__MAHESWAR_SAHOO": "Independent_57_3__MAHESWAR_SAHOO", "Independent_57_4__SARAT_CHANDRA_NAYAK": "Independent_57_4__SARAT_CHANDRA_NAYAK", "Independent_58_1__AJAYA_KUMAR_BISWAL": "Independent_58_1__AJAYA_KUMAR_BISWAL", "Independent_58_2__PATITAPABAN_MOHAPATRA": "Independent_58_2__PATITAPABAN_MOHAPATRA", "Independent_58_3__BIJAYA_KUMAR_ROUTRAY": "Independent_58_3__BIJAYA_KUMAR_ROUTRAY", "Independent_58_4__RAGHU_SINGH": "Independent_58_4__RAGHU_SINGH", "Independent_58_5__HIMANSU_BHUSAN_BARIK": "Independent_58_5__HIMANSU_BHUSAN_BARIK", "Independent_59_1__JUGAL_KISHOR_JIT": "Independent_59_1__JUGAL_KISHOR_JIT", "Independent_59_2__SATYAPRAKASH_MISHRA": "Independent_59_2__SATYAPRAKASH_MISHRA", "Independent_5_1__BALLABHA_PATRA": "Independent_5_1__BALLABHA_PATRA", "Independent_5_2__SABITRI_ACHARYA": "Independent_5_2__SABITRI_ACHARYA", "Independent_60_1__BHUPEN_THAMBA": "Independent_60_1__BHUPEN_THAMBA", "Independent_60_2__RUPAK_KUMAR_PANI": "Independent_60_2__RUPAK_KUMAR_PANI", "Independent_60_3__SANTOSH_KUMAR_SAHU": "Independent_60_3__SANTOSH_KUMAR_SAHU", "Independent_61_1__BABULA_SAHU": "Independent_61_1__BABULA_SAHU", "Independent_61_2__BRAJA_KISHORE_NAHAK": "Independent_61_2__BRAJA_KISHORE_NAHAK", "Independent_61_3__SANTOSH_KUMAR_NAIK": "Independent_61_3__SANTOSH_KUMAR_NAIK", "Independent_64_1__ASHRAYA_MAHANANDA": "Independent_64_1__ASHRAYA_MAHANANDA", "Independent_64_2__DAYA_SAGAR_MAHANANDA": "Independent_64_2__DAYA_SAGAR_MAHANANDA", "Independent_65_1__UTTAM_ADABANKA": "Independent_65_1__UTTAM_ADABANKA", "Independent_65_2__SONALI_BISHI": "Independent_65_2__SONALI_BISHI", "Independent_66_1__KUBER_SUNA": "Independent_66_1__KUBER_SUNA", "Independent_67_1__JATI_PADHAN": "Independent_67_1__JATI_PADHAN", "Independent_67_2__SAURI_KUMAR_SAHU": "Independent_67_2__SAURI_KUMAR_SAHU", "Independent_67_3__LABA_SUNA": "Independent_67_3__LABA_SUNA", "Independent_69_1__SATYANARAYAN_BOHIDAR": "Independent_69_1__SATYANARAYAN_BOHIDAR", "Independent_69_2__KHEMRAJ_AGRAWAL": "Independent_69_2__KHEMRAJ_AGRAWAL", "Independent_6_1__ABYAYBHARATI_SHEKHAWAT_R": "Independent_6_1__ABYAYBHARATI_SHEKHAWAT_R", "Independent_6_2__SUPRIT_KUMAR_BEHERA": "Independent_6_2__SUPRIT_KUMAR_BEHERA", "Independent_6_3__HEMANTA_KUMAR_RANA": "Independent_6_3__HEMANTA_KUMAR_RANA", "Independent_70_1__KAMAL_KUMAR_CHHATRIA": "Independent_70_1__KAMAL_KUMAR_CHHATRIA", "Independent_70_2__DHANESWAR_MAJHI": "Independent_70_2__DHANESWAR_MAJHI", "Independent_70_3__SURATHA_BEHERA": "Independent_70_3__SURATHA_BEHERA", "Independent_70_4__SOHAN_SIPKA": "Independent_70_4__SOHAN_SIPKA", "Independent_71_1__GHASIRAM_MAJHI": "Independent_71_1__GHASIRAM_MAJHI", "Independent_71_2__BHUJABAL_ADABANG": "Independent_71_2__BHUJABAL_ADABANG", "Independent_72_1__RANGADHAR_MAJHI": "Independent_72_1__RANGADHAR_MAJHI", "Independent_72_2__SHREEKANT_CHATTERJEE": "Independent_72_2__SHREEKANT_CHATTERJEE", "Independent_73_1__DASARATHA_MAJHI": "Independent_73_1__DASARATHA_MAJHI", "Independent_77_1__PHULAME_MAJHI": "Independent_77_1__PHULAME_MAJHI", "Independent_77_2__SURESH_MAJHI": "Independent_77_2__SURESH_MAJHI", "Independent_78_1__PARAMESWAR_KAND": "Independent_78_1__PARAMESWAR_KAND", "Independent_78_2__SUDHANIDHI_NAIK": "Independent_78_2__SUDHANIDHI_NAIK", "Independent_79_1__PRAHALAD_AGRAWAL": "Independent_79_1__PRAHALAD_AGRAWAL", "Independent_79_2__RUPADHAR_NAIK": "Independent_79_2__RUPADHAR_NAIK", "Independent_79_3__SOUMYA_RANJAN_NAIK": "Independent_79_3__SOUMYA_RANJAN_NAIK", "Independent_79_4__HEMANGINI_HANS": "Independent_79_4__HEMANGINI_HANS", "Independent_79_5__HERAMBA_SENAPATI": "Independent_79_5__HERAMBA_SENAPATI", "Independent_7_1__SADHANA_PANDEY": "Independent_7_1__SADHANA_PANDEY", "Independent_7_2__SANJITA_KISAN": "Independent_7_2__SANJITA_KISAN", "Independent_7_3__GNYANENDRA_BEHERA": "Independent_7_3__GNYANENDRA_BEHERA", "Independent_80_1__CHHAYAKANTI_KHAMARI": "Independent_80_1__CHHAYAKANTI_KHAMARI", "Independent_80_2__MAHENDRA_DHANGADA_MAJHI": "Independent_80_2__MAHENDRA_DHANGADA_MAJHI", "Independent_80_3__RAMESH_KUMAR_MAHANAND": "Independent_80_3__RAMESH_KUMAR_MAHANAND", "Independent_80_4__ROHIT_DURGA": "Independent_80_4__ROHIT_DURGA", "Independent_80_5__SANJAYA_SUNANI": "Independent_80_5__SANJAYA_SUNANI", "Independent_81_1__TIKEMANA_DEEP": "Independent_81_1__TIKEMANA_DEEP", "Independent_81_2__PRADEEP_KUMAR_NAIK": "Independent_81_2__PRADEEP_KUMAR_NAIK", "Independent_81_3__ROJARANI_JAL": "Independent_81_3__ROJARANI_JAL", "Independent_83_1__PRADEEP_KUMAR_KONHAR": "Independent_83_1__PRADEEP_KUMAR_KONHAR", "Independent_84_1__TIKESWARA_KANHAR": "Independent_84_1__TIKESWARA_KANHAR", "Independent_84_2__SUDHANSU_KUMAR_KANHAR": "Independent_84_2__SUDHANSU_KUMAR_KANHAR", "Independent_84_3__HIMMASU_KAHANRA": "Independent_84_3__HIMMASU_KAHANRA", "Independent_85_1__SATYABRAT_SAHU": "Independent_85_1__SATYABRAT_SAHU", "Independent_85_2__SUDHANSU_DANGA": "Independent_85_2__SUDHANSU_DANGA", "Independent_86_1__PRADIPA_SAHU": "Independent_86_1__PRADIPA_SAHU", "Independent_86_2__SOMANATH_PUROHIT": "Independent_86_2__SOMANATH_PUROHIT", "Independent_87_1__BIJAYA_KUMAR_DALABEHERA": "Independent_87_1__BIJAYA_KUMAR_DALABEHERA", "Independent_87_2__MANOJ_KUMAR_NANDA": "Independent_87_2__MANOJ_KUMAR_NANDA", "Independent_87_3__JUGAL_KISHOR_ROUT": "Independent_87_3__JUGAL_KISHOR_ROUT", "Independent_88_1__HEMANTA_KUMAR_DEBATA": "Independent_88_1__HEMANTA_KUMAR_DEBATA", "Independent_89_1__BIJAYA_KUMAR_PARIDA": "Independent_89_1__BIJAYA_KUMAR_PARIDA", "Independent_89_2__RAJENDRA_KUMAR_MOHANTY": "Independent_89_2__RAJENDRA_KUMAR_MOHANTY", "Independent_89_3__HARIHAR_SAHOO": "Independent_89_3__HARIHAR_SAHOO", "Independent_8_1__BIKRAM_TOPPO": "Independent_8_1__BIKRAM_TOPPO", "Independent_90_1__NARASINGHA_PATI": "Independent_90_1__NARASINGHA_PATI", "Independent_90_2__NILAMADHABA_DAS": "Independent_90_2__NILAMADHABA_DAS", "Independent_90_3__PRAKASH_CHANDRA_BEHERA": "Independent_90_3__PRAKASH_CHANDRA_BEHERA", "Independent_90_4__PRASANTA_KUMAR_ROUT": "Independent_90_4__PRASANTA_KUMAR_ROUT", "Independent_90_5__RAJESH_KUMAR_PATRA": "Independent_90_5__RAJESH_KUMAR_PATRA", "Independent_90_6__SOBHA_PANDEY": "Independent_90_6__SOBHA_PANDEY", "Independent_90_7__SANJIT_KUMAR_SAMAL": "Independent_90_7__SANJIT_KUMAR_SAMAL", "Independent_91_1__BIPLAB_NANDA": "Independent_91_1__BIPLAB_NANDA", "Independent_91_2__RANJEET_MALLICK": "Independent_91_2__RANJEET_MALLICK", "Independent_91_3__RUPALI_LENKA": "Independent_91_3__RUPALI_LENKA", "Independent_91_4__SOBHA_PANDEY": "Independent_91_4__SOBHA_PANDEY", "Independent_91_5__SUKANTA_CHANDRA_SAHANI": "Independent_91_5__SUKANTA_CHANDRA_SAHANI", "Independent_92_1__ABHIMANYU_MALLICK": "Independent_92_1__ABHIMANYU_MALLICK", "Independent_92_2__KRUSHNA_CHANDRA_BEHERA": "Independent_92_2__KRUSHNA_CHANDRA_BEHERA", "Independent_92_3__TRUPTI_RANJAN_BEHERA": "Independent_92_3__TRUPTI_RANJAN_BEHERA", "Independent_94_1__BISHESWAR_SWAIN": "Independent_94_1__BISHESWAR_SWAIN", "Independent_94_2__SUVESH_RANJAN_PARIDA": "Independent_94_2__SUVESH_RANJAN_PARIDA", "Independent_95_1__JAYANTA_KUMAR_DAS": "Independent_95_1__JAYANTA_KUMAR_DAS", "Independent_95_2__SARADA_PRASAD_PADHAN": "Independent_95_2__SARADA_PRASAD_PADHAN", "Independent_95_3__SRIRAM_PANDEY": "Independent_95_3__SRIRAM_PANDEY", "Independent_96_1__BIBHUTI_BHUSAN_PANDA": "Independent_96_1__BIBHUTI_BHUSAN_PANDA", "Independent_97_1__DINABANDHU_MALLIK": "Independent_97_1__DINABANDHU_MALLIK", "Independent_97_2__RANJAN_BEHERA": "Independent_97_2__RANJAN_BEHERA", "Independent_98_1__PARSURAM_DAS": "Independent_98_1__PARSURAM_DAS", "Independent_98_2__SRIRAM_PANDEY": "Independent_98_2__SRIRAM_PANDEY", "Independent_99_1__JIBAN_KRUSHNA_RAY": "Independent_99_1__JIBAN_KRUSHNA_RAY", "Independent_99_2__DIBYA_RANJAN_SWAIN": "Independent_99_2__DIBYA_RANJAN_SWAIN", "Independent_99_3__MANOJ_KUMAR_ROUT": "Independent_99_3__MANOJ_KUMAR_ROUT", "Independent_99_4__MAHENDRA_BAI": "Independent_99_4__MAHENDRA_BAI", "Independent_99_5__SNEHALATA_RAY": "Independent_99_5__SNEHALATA_RAY", "Independent_9_1__DEBENDRA_KUMAR_BHITRIA": "Independent_9_1__DEBENDRA_KUMAR_BHITRIA", "Indian_Citizens_Party": "Indian_Citizens_Party", "Indian_National_Congress": "Indian_National_Congress", "Jai_Maha_Bharath_Party": "Jai_Maha_Bharath_Party", "Janta_Darbar_Party": "Janta_Darbar_Party", "Jharkhand_Mukti_Morcha": "Jharkhand_Mukti_Morcha", "Jharkhand_Party": "Jharkhand_Party", "Jharkhand_People_s_Party": "Jharkhand_People_s_Party", "Kalinga_National_Front": "Kalinga_National_Front", "Kalinga_Sena": "Kalinga_Sena", "Kosal_Janata_Dal": "Kosal_Janata_Dal", "Koshal_Mukti_Morcha": "Koshal_Mukti_Morcha", "Krupaa_Party": "Krupaa_Party", "Manas_Lokshakti_Dal": "Manas_Lokshakti_Dal", "Mazdoor_Vikash_Dal": "Mazdoor_Vikash_Dal", "Mo_Dala": "Mo_Dala", "NOTA": "NOTA", "Naba_Bharata_Nirmana_Seva_Party": "Naba_Bharata_Nirmana_Seva_Party", "National_Apni_Party": "National_Apni_Party", "Odisha_Janata_Party": "Odisha_Janata_Party", "Odisha_Pragati_Dal": "Odisha_Pragati_Dal", "Paschimanchal_Vikas_Party": "Paschimanchal_Vikas_Party", "Praja_Ektha_Party": "Praja_Ektha_Party", "Proutist_Bloc_India": "Proutist_Bloc_India", "Rashtriya_Manav_Party": "Rashtriya_Manav_Party", "Republican_Party_of_India_A": "Republican_Party_of_India_A", "Republican_Party_of_India_Athawale": "Republican_Party_of_India_Athawale", "Samajwadi_Party": "Samajwadi_Party", "Sampoorna_Bharat_Kranti_Party": "Sampoorna_Bharat_Kranti_Party", "Samruddha_Odisha": "Samruddha_Odisha", "Socialist_Unity_Centre_Of_India_COMMUNIST": "Socialist_Unity_Centre_Of_India_COMMUNIST", "Supreme_Zero_Party_of_Bharat": "Supreme_Zero_Party_of_Bharat", "Utkal_Samaj": "Utkal_Samaj"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 147, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 147, "registered_not_positive": 147}, "n_stations_flagged": 147, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:29:42.696425", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.381, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.281, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.281, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 147}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ac9a5035260244519bd711b53ab81cc9", "name": "India 2021 local (overnight india_assam_2021_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Assam/Assam_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"BJP": "BJP", "INC": "INC", "NOTA": "NOTA", "SUCI": "SUCI", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "Independent_1_3": "Independent_1_3", "Independent_1_4": "Independent_1_4", "Independent_1_5": "Independent_1_5", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "AGP": "AGP", "Independent_2_3": "Independent_2_3", "AJP": "AJP", "Independent_2_4": "Independent_2_4", "Republican_Party_of_India": "Republican_Party_of_India", "Rashtriya_Ulama_Council": "Rashtriya_Ulama_Council", "Independent_2_5": "Independent_2_5", "Independent_2_6": "Independent_2_6", "Independent_2_7": "Independent_2_7", "AIFB": "AIFB", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "Independent_3_3": "Independent_3_3", "Independent_3_4": "Independent_3_4", "Independent_3_5": "Independent_3_5", "Independent_3_6": "Independent_3_6", "Independent_3_7": "Independent_3_7", "Independent_3_8": "Independent_3_8", "Independent_3_9": "Independent_3_9", "SP": "SP", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Rashtriya_Lok_Samta_Party": "Rashtriya_Lok_Samta_Party", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "Independent_4_4": "Independent_4_4", "Independent_4_5": "Independent_4_5", "Independent_4_6": "Independent_4_6", "Independent_4_7": "Independent_4_7", "Independent_4_8": "Independent_4_8", "Independent_4_9": "Independent_4_9", "Independent_4_10": "Independent_4_10", "Independent_4_11": "Independent_4_11", "Independent_4_12": "Independent_4_12", "AIUDF": "AIUDF", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "Independent_5_2": "Independent_5_2", "Independent_5_3": "Independent_5_3", "Independent_5_4": "Independent_5_4", "Independent_5_5": "Independent_5_5", "Independent_5_6": "Independent_5_6", "Independent_5_7": "Independent_5_7", "Independent_5_8": "Independent_5_8", "Independent_5_9": "Independent_5_9", "Independent_5_10": "Independent_5_10", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "Independent_6_2": "Independent_6_2", "Independent_6_3": "Independent_6_3", "Independent_6_4": "Independent_6_4", "AITC": "AITC", "Bharatiya_Gana_Parishad": "Bharatiya_Gana_Parishad", "Independent_6_5": "Independent_6_5", "Independent_6_6": "Independent_6_6", "Independent_6_7": "Independent_6_7", "Independent_6_8": "Independent_6_8", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "JD_U": "JD_U", "Independent_7_2": "Independent_7_2", "Independent_7_3": "Independent_7_3", "Independent_7_4": "Independent_7_4", "Independent_7_5": "Independent_7_5", "Independent_7_6": "Independent_7_6", "Independent_7_7": "Independent_7_7", "Independent_7_8": "Independent_7_8", "Independent_7_9": "Independent_7_9", "Independent_7_10": "Independent_7_10", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Independent_8_2": "Independent_8_2", "Independent_8_3": "Independent_8_3", "Independent_8_4": "Independent_8_4", "Independent_8_5": "Independent_8_5", "Independent_8_6": "Independent_8_6", "Independent_8_7": "Independent_8_7", "Independent_8_8": "Independent_8_8", "Independent_8_9": "Independent_8_9", "Independent_8_10": "Independent_8_10", "Independent_8_11": "Independent_8_11", "Independent_8_12": "Independent_8_12", "Independent_8_13": "Independent_8_13", "Independent_8_14": "Independent_8_14", "Independent_8_15": "Independent_8_15", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "Independent_9_2": "Independent_9_2", "Hindusthan_Nirman_Dal": "Hindusthan_Nirman_Dal", "Independent_9_3": "Independent_9_3", "Independent_9_4": "Independent_9_4", "Independent_9_5": "Independent_9_5", "Republican_Party_of_India_A": "Republican_Party_of_India_A", "Independent_9_6": "Independent_9_6", "Independent_9_7": "Independent_9_7", "Independent_9_8": "Independent_9_8", "Independent_9_9": "Independent_9_9", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "Independent_10_3": "Independent_10_3", "Independent_10_4": "Independent_10_4", "Independent_10_5": "Independent_10_5", "Independent_10_6": "Independent_10_6", "Independent_10_7": "Independent_10_7", "Independent_10_8": "Independent_10_8", "Independent_10_9": "Independent_10_9", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "Independent_11_3": "Independent_11_3", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "Independent_12_3": "Independent_12_3", "Independent_12_4": "Independent_12_4", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "Independent_13_3": "Independent_13_3", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_15_2": "Independent_15_2", "Independent_15_3": "Independent_15_3", "Independent_15_4": "Independent_15_4", "Independent_15_5": "Independent_15_5", "Independent_15_6": "Independent_15_6", "Bhartiya_Tribal_Party": "Bhartiya_Tribal_Party", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Autonomous_State_Demand_Committee": "Autonomous_State_Demand_Committee", "CPI_ML_L": "CPI_ML_L", "NPP": "NPP", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "Independent_19_3": "Independent_19_3", "Independent_19_4": "Independent_19_4", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_20_2": "Independent_20_2", "Independent_20_3": "Independent_20_3", "Independent_20_4": "Independent_20_4", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_21_2": "Independent_21_2", "Independent_21_3": "Independent_21_3", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_22_2": "Independent_22_2", "Independent_22_3": "Independent_22_3", "NCP": "NCP", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_23_2": "Independent_23_2", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "Independent_24_2": "Independent_24_2", "Independent_24_3": "Independent_24_3", "Independent_24_4": "Independent_24_4", "Independent_24_5": "Independent_24_5", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "The_National_Road_Map_Party_of_India": "The_National_Road_Map_Party_of_India", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "Independent_27_3": "Independent_27_3", "Independent_27_4": "Independent_27_4", "Independent_27_5": "Independent_27_5", "Independent_27_6": "Independent_27_6", "BOPF": "BOPF", "UPPL": "UPPL", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "Independent_28_4": "Independent_28_4", "Independent_28_5": "Independent_28_5", "Independent_28_6": "Independent_28_6", "Independent_28_7": "Independent_28_7", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "Voters_Party_International": "Voters_Party_International", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_31_2": "Independent_31_2", "Political_Justice_Party": "Political_Justice_Party", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_33_3": "Independent_33_3", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "Independent_35_2": "Independent_35_2", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_36_3": "Independent_36_3", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "Independent_37_3": "Independent_37_3", "All_India_Minorities_Front": "All_India_Minorities_Front", "Independent_37_4": "Independent_37_4", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_38_3": "Independent_38_3", "Independent_38_4": "Independent_38_4", "Independent_38_5": "Independent_38_5", "Independent_38_6": "Independent_38_6", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_39_2": "Independent_39_2", "CPM": "CPM", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_40_3": "Independent_40_3", "Independent_40_4": "Independent_40_4", "RPI_A": "RPI_A", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "Independent_41_3": "Independent_41_3", "Independent_41_4": "Independent_41_4", "Independent_41_5": "Independent_41_5", "Independent_41_6": "Independent_41_6", "Independent_41_7": "Independent_41_7", "Independent_42_1": "Independent_42_1", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "Independent_44_3": "Independent_44_3", "Independent_44_4": "Independent_44_4", "Independent_44_5": "Independent_44_5", "National_Republican_Congress": "National_Republican_Congress", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Bhartiya_Rashtrawadi_Party": "Bhartiya_Rashtrawadi_Party", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "Janata_Party": "Janata_Party", "Bahujan_Maha_Party": "Bahujan_Maha_Party", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "Independent_47_3": "Independent_47_3", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "Independent_49_3": "Independent_49_3", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_50_3": "Independent_50_3", "Independent_50_4": "Independent_50_4", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_51_3": "Independent_51_3", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "Independent_52_3": "Independent_52_3", "Independent_52_4": "Independent_52_4", "Independent_52_5": "Independent_52_5", "LJP": "LJP", "Independent_52_6": "Independent_52_6", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "Independent_53_2": "Independent_53_2", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_54_3": "Independent_54_3", "Independent_54_4": "Independent_54_4", "Independent_54_5": "Independent_54_5", "Independent_54_6": "Independent_54_6", "Independent_54_7": "Independent_54_7", "Swarna_Bharat_Party": "Swarna_Bharat_Party", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_55_2": "Independent_55_2", "Independent_55_3": "Independent_55_3", "Independent_55_4": "Independent_55_4", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_57_2": "Independent_57_2", "Independent_57_3": "Independent_57_3", "Independent_58_1": "Independent_58_1", "Independent_58_2": "Independent_58_2", "Independent_58_3": "Independent_58_3", "Independent_58_4": "Independent_58_4", "Independent_58_5": "Independent_58_5", "Independent_58_6": "Independent_58_6", "Independent_58_7": "Independent_58_7", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_59_2": "Independent_59_2", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "Independent_63_3": "Independent_63_3", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_64_2": "Independent_64_2", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_65_2": "Independent_65_2", "Independent_65_3": "Independent_65_3", "Independent_65_4": "Independent_65_4", "Independent_65_5": "Independent_65_5", "Independent_65_6": "Independent_65_6", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_66_2": "Independent_66_2", "Independent_66_3": "Independent_66_3", "Independent_66_4": "Independent_66_4", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "Independent_70_2": "Independent_70_2", "Independent_70_3": "Independent_70_3", "Independent_70_4": "Independent_70_4", "Independent_70_5": "Independent_70_5", "Independent_71_1": "Independent_71_1", "Independent_71_2": "Independent_71_2", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "Independent_73_3": "Independent_73_3", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_74_2": "Independent_74_2", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "CPI": "CPI", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "Independent_81_2": "Independent_81_2", "Independent_81_3": "Independent_81_3", "Independent_81_4": "Independent_81_4", "Independent_81_5": "Independent_81_5", "Independent_82_1": "Independent_82_1", "Independent_82_2": "Independent_82_2", "Independent_82_3": "Independent_82_3", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Revolutionary_Communist_Party_of_India_Rasik_Bhatt": "Revolutionary_Communist_Party_of_India_Rasik_Bhatt", "Independent_83_2": "Independent_83_2", "Asom_Jana_Morcha": "Asom_Jana_Morcha", "Independent_84_1": "Independent_84_1", "Independent_84_2": "Independent_84_2", "Independent_85_1": "Independent_85_1", "Independent_85_2": "Independent_85_2", "Independent_85_3": "Independent_85_3", "Independent_85_4": "Independent_85_4", "Independent_86_1": "Independent_86_1", "Independent_86_2": "Independent_86_2", "Independent_86_3": "Independent_86_3", "Independent_86_4": "Independent_86_4", "Independent_86_5": "Independent_86_5", "Independent_87_1": "Independent_87_1", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_90_1": "Independent_90_1", "Independent_90_2": "Independent_90_2", "Independent_90_3": "Independent_90_3", "Independent_90_4": "Independent_90_4", "Independent_90_5": "Independent_90_5", "Independent_90_6": "Independent_90_6", "Independent_90_7": "Independent_90_7", "Independent_90_8": "Independent_90_8", "Independent_90_9": "Independent_90_9", "Lok_Raksha_Party": "Lok_Raksha_Party", "Independent_91_1": "Independent_91_1", "Independent_91_2": "Independent_91_2", "Independent_92_1": "Independent_92_1", "Independent_92_2": "Independent_92_2", "Independent_92_3": "Independent_92_3", "Independent_93_1": "Independent_93_1", "Independent_93_2": "Independent_93_2", "Independent_93_3": "Independent_93_3", "Independent_93_4": "Independent_93_4", "Independent_93_5": "Independent_93_5", "Independent_93_6": "Independent_93_6", "Independent_93_7": "Independent_93_7", "Independent_93_8": "Independent_93_8", "Independent_94_1": "Independent_94_1", "Independent_96_1": "Independent_96_1", "Asom_Songrami_Mancha_Asom": "Asom_Songrami_Mancha_Asom", "Independent_96_2": "Independent_96_2", "Independent_97_1": "Independent_97_1", "Independent_98_1": "Independent_98_1", "Independent_99_1": "Independent_99_1", "Independent_100_1": "Independent_100_1", "Independent_102_1": "Independent_102_1", "Independent_102_2": "Independent_102_2", "Independent_103_1": "Independent_103_1", "Independent_103_2": "Independent_103_2", "Independent_104_1": "Independent_104_1", "Independent_105_1": "Independent_105_1", "Independent_105_2": "Independent_105_2", "Independent_106_1": "Independent_106_1", "Independent_108_1": "Independent_108_1", "Independent_108_2": "Independent_108_2", "Independent_108_3": "Independent_108_3", "Independent_109_1": "Independent_109_1", "Independent_109_2": "Independent_109_2", "Independent_109_3": "Independent_109_3", "Independent_109_4": "Independent_109_4", "Independent_110_1": "Independent_110_1", "Independent_110_2": "Independent_110_2", "Independent_110_3": "Independent_110_3", "Independent_110_4": "Independent_110_4", "Independent_111_1": "Independent_111_1", "Independent_113_1": "Independent_113_1", "Independent_114_1": "Independent_114_1", "Independent_114_2": "Independent_114_2", "Independent_115_1": "Independent_115_1", "Independent_115_2": "Independent_115_2", "Independent_115_3": "Independent_115_3", "Independent_116_1": "Independent_116_1", "Independent_117_1": "Independent_117_1", "Independent_117_2": "Independent_117_2", "Independent_119_1": "Independent_119_1", "Independent_120_1": "Independent_120_1", "Independent_121_1": "Independent_121_1", "Independent_121_2": "Independent_121_2", "Independent_121_3": "Independent_121_3", "RJD": "RJD", "Independent_122_1": "Independent_122_1", "Independent_124_1": "Independent_124_1", "Independent_124_2": "Independent_124_2", "Independent_124_3": "Independent_124_3", "Independent_125_1": "Independent_125_1", "Independent_125_2": "Independent_125_2", "Independent_125_3": "Independent_125_3", "Independent_126_1": "Independent_126_1", "Independent_126_2": "Independent_126_2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 126, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 126, "cast_gt_registered": 126}, "n_stations_flagged": 126, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:29:35.934297", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.398, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.307, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.398, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.398, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.307, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.307, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.234, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.234, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.687, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.466, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.466, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 126}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bc6074803fb8475da956525686f28b5c", "name": "India 2024 local (overnight india-haryana-2024-assembly-v2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AAP": "AAP", "Aam_Aadmi_Parivartan_Party": "Aam_Aadmi_Parivartan_Party", "Aam_Janshakti_Party": "Aam_Janshakti_Party", "Aazad_Samaj_Party_Kanshi_Ram": "Aazad_Samaj_Party_Kanshi_Ram", "Akhil_Bharatiya_Socialist_Party": "Akhil_Bharatiya_Socialist_Party", "Akhil_Bhartiya_Kisan_Majdoor_Party": "Akhil_Bhartiya_Kisan_Majdoor_Party", "Akhil_Bhartiya_Manavatavadi_Party": "Akhil_Bhartiya_Manavatavadi_Party", "Ambedkar_Samaj_Vikas_Party": "Ambedkar_Samaj_Vikas_Party", "BJP": "BJP", "BSP": "BSP", "Bahujan_Janata_Dal_Khodawal": "Bahujan_Janata_Dal_Khodawal", "Bahujan_Mukti_Party": "Bahujan_Mukti_Party", "Bharat_Jan_Jagran_Dal": "Bharat_Jan_Jagran_Dal", "Bharat_Jodo_Party": "Bharat_Jodo_Party", "Bharatiya_Asha_Party": "Bharatiya_Asha_Party", "Bhartiya_Janraj_Party": "Bhartiya_Janraj_Party", "Bhartiya_Kisan_Party": "Bhartiya_Kisan_Party", "Bhartiya_Panchyat_Party": "Bhartiya_Panchyat_Party", "Bhartiya_Sarvodaya_Party": "Bhartiya_Sarvodaya_Party", "Bhartiya_Shakti_Chetna_Party": "Bhartiya_Shakti_Chetna_Party", "Bhartiya_Veer_Dal": "Bhartiya_Veer_Dal", "Buland_Bharat_Party": "Buland_Bharat_Party", "CPI": "CPI", "CPM": "CPM", "Haryana_Jan_Sevak_Party": "Haryana_Jan_Sevak_Party", "Haryana_Lokhit_Party": "Haryana_Lokhit_Party", "INC": "INC", "INLD": "INLD", "Independent_01_1": "Independent_01_1", "Independent_01_2": "Independent_01_2", "Independent_01_3": "Independent_01_3", "Independent_02_1": "Independent_02_1", "Independent_02_2": "Independent_02_2", "Independent_02_3": "Independent_02_3", "Independent_03_1": "Independent_03_1", "Independent_03_2": "Independent_03_2", "Independent_04_1": "Independent_04_1", "Independent_04_2": "Independent_04_2", "Independent_04_3": "Independent_04_3", "Independent_04_4": "Independent_04_4", "Independent_04_5": "Independent_04_5", "Independent_05_1": "Independent_05_1", "Independent_05_2": "Independent_05_2", "Independent_05_3": "Independent_05_3", "Independent_05_4": "Independent_05_4", "Independent_05_5": "Independent_05_5", "Independent_05_6": "Independent_05_6", "Independent_06_1": "Independent_06_1", "Independent_06_2": "Independent_06_2", "Independent_06_3": "Independent_06_3", "Independent_06_4": "Independent_06_4", "Independent_07_1": "Independent_07_1", "Independent_07_2": "Independent_07_2", "Independent_08_1": "Independent_08_1", "Independent_08_2": "Independent_08_2", "Independent_08_3": "Independent_08_3", "Independent_08_4": "Independent_08_4", "Independent_09_1": "Independent_09_1", "Independent_09_2": "Independent_09_2", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "Independent_10_3": "Independent_10_3", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "Independent_11_3": "Independent_11_3", "Independent_11_4": "Independent_11_4", "Independent_11_5": "Independent_11_5", "Independent_11_6": "Independent_11_6", "Independent_11_7": "Independent_11_7", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "Independent_12_3": "Independent_12_3", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "Independent_13_3": "Independent_13_3", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_15_2": "Independent_15_2", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_16_2": "Independent_16_2", "Independent_16_3": "Independent_16_3", "Independent_16_4": "Independent_16_4", "Independent_16_5": "Independent_16_5", "Independent_16_6": "Independent_16_6", "Independent_16_7": "Independent_16_7", "Independent_16_8": "Independent_16_8", "Independent_16_9": "Independent_16_9", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "Independent_17_3": "Independent_17_3", "Independent_17_4": "Independent_17_4", "Independent_17_5": "Independent_17_5", "Independent_17_6": "Independent_17_6", "Independent_17_7": "Independent_17_7", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_10": "Independent_18_10", "Independent_18_11": "Independent_18_11", "Independent_18_12": "Independent_18_12", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "Independent_18_3": "Independent_18_3", "Independent_18_4": "Independent_18_4", "Independent_18_5": "Independent_18_5", "Independent_18_6": "Independent_18_6", "Independent_18_7": "Independent_18_7", "Independent_18_8": "Independent_18_8", "Independent_18_9": "Independent_18_9", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "Independent_19_3": "Independent_19_3", "Independent_19_4": "Independent_19_4", "Independent_19_5": "Independent_19_5", "Independent_19_6": "Independent_19_6", "Independent_19_7": "Independent_19_7", "Independent_19_8": "Independent_19_8", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "Independent_21_2": "Independent_21_2", "Independent_21_3": "Independent_21_3", "Independent_21_4": "Independent_21_4", "Independent_21_5": "Independent_21_5", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_22_2": "Independent_22_2", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "Independent_23_2": "Independent_23_2", "Independent_23_3": "Independent_23_3", "Independent_23_4": "Independent_23_4", "Independent_23_5": "Independent_23_5", "Independent_23_6": "Independent_23_6", "Independent_23_7": "Independent_23_7", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "Independent_24_2": "Independent_24_2", "Independent_24_3": "Independent_24_3", "Independent_24_4": "Independent_24_4", "Independent_24_5": "Independent_24_5", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "Independent_25_4": "Independent_25_4", "Independent_25_5": "Independent_25_5", "Independent_25_6": "Independent_25_6", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "Independent_28_4": "Independent_28_4", "Independent_28_5": "Independent_28_5", "Independent_28_6": "Independent_28_6", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_29_3": "Independent_29_3", "Independent_29_4": "Independent_29_4", "Independent_29_5": "Independent_29_5", "Independent_29_6": "Independent_29_6", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_31_2": "Independent_31_2", "Independent_31_3": "Independent_31_3", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_32_3": "Independent_32_3", "Independent_32_4": "Independent_32_4", "Independent_32_5": "Independent_32_5", "Independent_32_6": "Independent_32_6", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_33_2": "Independent_33_2", "Independent_34_1": "Independent_34_1", "Independent_34_2": "Independent_34_2", "Independent_34_3": "Independent_34_3", "Independent_34_4": "Independent_34_4", "Independent_34_5": "Independent_34_5", "Independent_34_6": "Independent_34_6", "Independent_35_1": "Independent_35_1", "Independent_35_10": "Independent_35_10", "Independent_35_2": "Independent_35_2", "Independent_35_3": "Independent_35_3", "Independent_35_4": "Independent_35_4", "Independent_35_5": "Independent_35_5", "Independent_35_6": "Independent_35_6", "Independent_35_7": "Independent_35_7", "Independent_35_8": "Independent_35_8", "Independent_35_9": "Independent_35_9", "Independent_36_1": "Independent_36_1", "Independent_36_2": "Independent_36_2", "Independent_36_3": "Independent_36_3", "Independent_36_4": "Independent_36_4", "Independent_36_5": "Independent_36_5", "Independent_36_6": "Independent_36_6", "Independent_36_7": "Independent_36_7", "Independent_36_8": "Independent_36_8", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_37_10": "Independent_37_10", "Independent_37_11": "Independent_37_11", "Independent_37_12": "Independent_37_12", "Independent_37_13": "Independent_37_13", "Independent_37_2": "Independent_37_2", "Independent_37_3": "Independent_37_3", "Independent_37_4": "Independent_37_4", "Independent_37_5": "Independent_37_5", "Independent_37_6": "Independent_37_6", "Independent_37_7": "Independent_37_7", "Independent_37_8": "Independent_37_8", "Independent_37_9": "Independent_37_9", "Independent_38_1": "Independent_38_1", "Independent_38_2": "Independent_38_2", "Independent_38_3": "Independent_38_3", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_39_2": "Independent_39_2", "Independent_39_3": "Independent_39_3", "Independent_39_4": "Independent_39_4", "Independent_39_5": "Independent_39_5", "Independent_39_6": "Independent_39_6", "Independent_39_7": "Independent_39_7", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "Independent_40_10": "Independent_40_10", "Independent_40_11": "Independent_40_11", "Independent_40_2": "Independent_40_2", "Independent_40_3": "Independent_40_3", "Independent_40_4": "Independent_40_4", "Independent_40_5": "Independent_40_5", "Independent_40_6": "Independent_40_6", "Independent_40_7": "Independent_40_7", "Independent_40_8": "Independent_40_8", "Independent_40_9": "Independent_40_9", "Independent_41_1": "Independent_41_1", "Independent_41_2": "Independent_41_2", "Independent_41_3": "Independent_41_3", "Independent_41_4": "Independent_41_4", "Independent_43_1": "Independent_43_1", "Independent_43_2": "Independent_43_2", "Independent_43_3": "Independent_43_3", "Independent_43_4": "Independent_43_4", "Independent_43_5": "Independent_43_5", "Independent_44_1": "Independent_44_1", "Independent_44_2": "Independent_44_2", "Independent_44_3": "Independent_44_3", "Independent_44_4": "Independent_44_4", "Independent_44_5": "Independent_44_5", "Independent_44_6": "Independent_44_6", "Independent_44_7": "Independent_44_7", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_45_2": "Independent_45_2", "Independent_45_3": "Independent_45_3", "Independent_45_4": "Independent_45_4", "Independent_45_5": "Independent_45_5", "Independent_45_6": "Independent_45_6", "Independent_46_1": "Independent_46_1", "Independent_46_2": "Independent_46_2", "Independent_46_3": "Independent_46_3", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_47_2": "Independent_47_2", "Independent_47_3": "Independent_47_3", "Independent_47_4": "Independent_47_4", "Independent_47_5": "Independent_47_5", "Independent_47_6": "Independent_47_6", "Independent_48_1": "Independent_48_1", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_49_2": "Independent_49_2", "Independent_49_3": "Independent_49_3", "Independent_49_4": "Independent_49_4", "Independent_49_5": "Independent_49_5", "Independent_49_6": "Independent_49_6", "Independent_49_7": "Independent_49_7", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_50_2": "Independent_50_2", "Independent_50_3": "Independent_50_3", "Independent_50_4": "Independent_50_4", "Independent_50_5": "Independent_50_5", "Independent_50_6": "Independent_50_6", "Independent_50_7": "Independent_50_7", "Independent_51_1": "Independent_51_1", "Independent_51_2": "Independent_51_2", "Independent_51_3": "Independent_51_3", "Independent_52_1": "Independent_52_1", "Independent_52_10": "Independent_52_10", "Independent_52_11": "Independent_52_11", "Independent_52_12": "Independent_52_12", "Independent_52_13": "Independent_52_13", "Independent_52_14": "Independent_52_14", "Independent_52_2": "Independent_52_2", "Independent_52_3": "Independent_52_3", "Independent_52_4": "Independent_52_4", "Independent_52_5": "Independent_52_5", "Independent_52_6": "Independent_52_6", "Independent_52_7": "Independent_52_7", "Independent_52_8": "Independent_52_8", "Independent_52_9": "Independent_52_9", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1", "Independent_53_2": "Independent_53_2", "Independent_53_3": "Independent_53_3", "Independent_53_4": "Independent_53_4", "Independent_53_5": "Independent_53_5", "Independent_53_6": "Independent_53_6", "Independent_53_7": "Independent_53_7", "Independent_54_1": "Independent_54_1", "Independent_54_2": "Independent_54_2", "Independent_54_3": "Independent_54_3", "Independent_54_4": "Independent_54_4", "Independent_54_5": "Independent_54_5", "Independent_54_6": "Independent_54_6", "Independent_54_7": "Independent_54_7", "Independent_54_8": "Independent_54_8", "Independent_55_1": "Independent_55_1", "Independent_55_2": "Independent_55_2", "Independent_55_3": "Independent_55_3", "Independent_55_4": "Independent_55_4", "Independent_55_5": "Independent_55_5", "Independent_55_6": "Independent_55_6", "Independent_55_7": "Independent_55_7", "Independent_55_8": "Independent_55_8", "Independent_55_9": "Independent_55_9", "Independent_56_1": "Independent_56_1", "Independent_56_10": "Independent_56_10", "Independent_56_11": "Independent_56_11", "Independent_56_2": "Independent_56_2", "Independent_56_3": "Independent_56_3", "Independent_56_4": "Independent_56_4", "Independent_56_5": "Independent_56_5", "Independent_56_6": "Independent_56_6", "Independent_56_7": "Independent_56_7", "Independent_56_8": "Independent_56_8", "Independent_56_9": "Independent_56_9", "Independent_57_1": "Independent_57_1", "Independent_57_10": "Independent_57_10", "Independent_57_11": "Independent_57_11", "Independent_57_12": "Independent_57_12", "Independent_57_2": "Independent_57_2", "Independent_57_3": "Independent_57_3", "Independent_57_4": "Independent_57_4", "Independent_57_5": "Independent_57_5", "Independent_57_6": "Independent_57_6", "Independent_57_7": "Independent_57_7", "Independent_57_8": "Independent_57_8", "Independent_57_9": "Independent_57_9", "Independent_58_1": "Independent_58_1", "Independent_58_2": "Independent_58_2", "Independent_58_3": "Independent_58_3", "Independent_58_4": "Independent_58_4", "Independent_58_5": "Independent_58_5", "Independent_58_6": "Independent_58_6", "Independent_59_1": "Independent_59_1", "Independent_59_2": "Independent_59_2", "Independent_59_3": "Independent_59_3", "Independent_60_1": "Independent_60_1", "Independent_60_10": "Independent_60_10", "Independent_60_11": "Independent_60_11", "Independent_60_2": "Independent_60_2", "Independent_60_3": "Independent_60_3", "Independent_60_4": "Independent_60_4", "Independent_60_5": "Independent_60_5", "Independent_60_6": "Independent_60_6", "Independent_60_7": "Independent_60_7", "Independent_60_8": "Independent_60_8", "Independent_60_9": "Independent_60_9", "Independent_61_1": "Independent_61_1", "Independent_61_2": "Independent_61_2", "Independent_61_3": "Independent_61_3", "Independent_61_4": "Independent_61_4", "Independent_62_1": "Independent_62_1", "Independent_62_2": "Independent_62_2", "Independent_62_3": "Independent_62_3", "Independent_62_4": "Independent_62_4", "Independent_62_5": "Independent_62_5", "Independent_62_6": "Independent_62_6", "Independent_62_7": "Independent_62_7", "Independent_63_1": "Independent_63_1", "Independent_63_2": "Independent_63_2", "Independent_63_3": "Independent_63_3", "Independent_63_4": "Independent_63_4", "Independent_64_1": "Independent_64_1", "Independent_64_10": "Independent_64_10", "Independent_64_2": "Independent_64_2", "Independent_64_3": "Independent_64_3", "Independent_64_4": "Independent_64_4", "Independent_64_5": "Independent_64_5", "Independent_64_6": "Independent_64_6", "Independent_64_7": "Independent_64_7", "Independent_64_8": "Independent_64_8", "Independent_64_9": "Independent_64_9", "Independent_65_1": "Independent_65_1", "Independent_65_2": "Independent_65_2", "Independent_65_3": "Independent_65_3", "Independent_65_4": "Independent_65_4", "Independent_65_5": "Independent_65_5", "Independent_66_1": "Independent_66_1", "Independent_66_2": "Independent_66_2", "Independent_66_3": "Independent_66_3", "Independent_66_4": "Independent_66_4", "Independent_66_5": "Independent_66_5", "Independent_67_1": "Independent_67_1", "Independent_67_2": "Independent_67_2", "Independent_67_3": "Independent_67_3", "Independent_68_1": "Independent_68_1", "Independent_68_2": "Independent_68_2", "Independent_69_1": "Independent_69_1", "Independent_69_2": "Independent_69_2", "Independent_69_3": "Independent_69_3", "Independent_69_4": "Independent_69_4", "Independent_69_5": "Independent_69_5", "Independent_69_6": "Independent_69_6", "Independent_70_1": "Independent_70_1", "Independent_70_2": "Independent_70_2", "Independent_70_3": "Independent_70_3", "Independent_70_4": "Independent_70_4", "Independent_71_1": "Independent_71_1", "Independent_72_1": "Independent_72_1", "Independent_72_2": "Independent_72_2", "Independent_72_3": "Independent_72_3", "Independent_72_4": "Independent_72_4", "Independent_72_5": "Independent_72_5", "Independent_73_1": "Independent_73_1", "Independent_73_2": "Independent_73_2", "Independent_73_3": "Independent_73_3", "Independent_73_4": "Independent_73_4", "Independent_73_5": "Independent_73_5", "Independent_73_6": "Independent_73_6", "Independent_73_7": "Independent_73_7", "Independent_73_8": "Independent_73_8", "Independent_74_1": "Independent_74_1", "Independent_74_2": "Independent_74_2", "Independent_74_3": "Independent_74_3", "Independent_74_4": "Independent_74_4", "Independent_74_5": "Independent_74_5", "Independent_75_1": "Independent_75_1", "Independent_75_2": "Independent_75_2", "Independent_76_1": "Independent_76_1", "Independent_76_2": "Independent_76_2", "Independent_76_3": "Independent_76_3", "Independent_76_4": "Independent_76_4", "Independent_76_5": "Independent_76_5", "Independent_76_6": "Independent_76_6", "Independent_77_1": "Independent_77_1", "Independent_77_2": "Independent_77_2", "Independent_77_3": "Independent_77_3", "Independent_77_4": "Independent_77_4", "Independent_77_5": "Independent_77_5", "Independent_77_6": "Independent_77_6", "Independent_77_7": "Independent_77_7", "Independent_77_8": "Independent_77_8", "Independent_77_9": "Independent_77_9", "Independent_78_1": "Independent_78_1", "Independent_78_2": "Independent_78_2", "Independent_78_3": "Independent_78_3", "Independent_78_4": "Independent_78_4", "Independent_80_1": "Independent_80_1", "Independent_80_2": "Independent_80_2", "Independent_80_3": "Independent_80_3", "Independent_81_1": "Independent_81_1", "Independent_81_2": "Independent_81_2", "Independent_82_1": "Independent_82_1", "Independent_82_2": "Independent_82_2", "Independent_82_3": "Independent_82_3", "Independent_83_1": "Independent_83_1", "Independent_83_2": "Independent_83_2", "Independent_83_3": "Independent_83_3", "Independent_83_4": "Independent_83_4", "Independent_83_5": "Independent_83_5", "Independent_83_6": "Independent_83_6", "Independent_83_7": "Independent_83_7", "Independent_84_1": "Independent_84_1", "Independent_84_2": "Independent_84_2", "Independent_84_3": "Independent_84_3", "Independent_84_4": "Independent_84_4", "Independent_85_1": "Independent_85_1", "Independent_85_2": "Independent_85_2", "Independent_85_3": "Independent_85_3", "Independent_85_4": "Independent_85_4", "Independent_85_5": "Independent_85_5", "Independent_85_6": "Independent_85_6", "Independent_85_7": "Independent_85_7", "Independent_86_1": "Independent_86_1", "Independent_86_2": "Independent_86_2", "Independent_86_3": "Independent_86_3", "Independent_86_4": "Independent_86_4", "Independent_87_1": "Independent_87_1", "Independent_87_2": "Independent_87_2", "Independent_88_1": "Independent_88_1", "Independent_88_2": "Independent_88_2", "Independent_88_3": "Independent_88_3", "Independent_88_4": "Independent_88_4", "Independent_89_1": "Independent_89_1", "Independent_89_2": "Independent_89_2", "Independent_89_3": "Independent_89_3", "Independent_89_4": "Independent_89_4", "Independent_90_1": "Independent_90_1", "Independent_90_2": "Independent_90_2", "Independent_90_3": "Independent_90_3", "Independent_90_4": "Independent_90_4", "Independent_90_5": "Independent_90_5", "Indian_Praja_Congress": "Indian_Praja_Congress", "JJP": "JJP", "Jan_Sewak_Kranti_Party": "Jan_Sewak_Kranti_Party", "Kisan_Mazdoor_Sangharsh_Party": "Kisan_Mazdoor_Sangharsh_Party", "Liberal_Socialist_Party": "Liberal_Socialist_Party", "Loktanter_Suraksha_Party": "Loktanter_Suraksha_Party", "Mission_Ekta_Party": "Mission_Ekta_Party", "NOTA": "NOTA", "Nationalist_Congress_Party": "Nationalist_Congress_Party", "Nationalist_Congress_Party_Sharadchandra_Pawar": "Nationalist_Congress_Party_Sharadchandra_Pawar", "Nehru_Janhit_Congress": "Nehru_Janhit_Congress", "Peoples_Party_of_India_Democratic": "Peoples_Party_of_India_Democratic", "Political_Team_India": "Political_Team_India", "Rashtra_Nirman_Party": "Rashtra_Nirman_Party", "Rashtravadi_Bharat_Party": "Rashtravadi_Bharat_Party", "Rashtrawadi_Janlok_Party_Satya": "Rashtrawadi_Janlok_Party_Satya", "Rashtriya_Bhagidari_Samaj_Party": "Rashtriya_Bhagidari_Samaj_Party", "Rashtriya_Garib_Dal": "Rashtriya_Garib_Dal", "Rashtriya_Janhit_Vikas_Party": "Rashtriya_Janhit_Vikas_Party", "Rashtriya_Jatigat_Aarakshan_Virodhi_Party": "Rashtriya_Jatigat_Aarakshan_Virodhi_Party", "Rashtriya_Lokswaraj_Party": "Rashtriya_Lokswaraj_Party", "Rashtriya_Majdoor_Vikas_Party": "Rashtriya_Majdoor_Vikas_Party", "Rashtriya_Mazdoor_Ekta_Party": "Rashtriya_Mazdoor_Ekta_Party", "Republican_Party_of_India": "Republican_Party_of_India", "Republican_Party_of_India_A": "Republican_Party_of_India_A", "Right_to_Recall_Party": "Right_to_Recall_Party", "Samata_Party": "Samata_Party", "Sanyukt_Sangharsh_Party": "Sanyukt_Sangharsh_Party", "Sarva_Jan_Smaj_Party_Nand_Kishore_Chawla": "Sarva_Jan_Smaj_Party_Nand_Kishore_Chawla", "Shiromani_Akali_Dal_Amritsar_Simranjit_Singh_Mann": "Shiromani_Akali_Dal_Amritsar_Simranjit_Singh_Mann", "Socialist_Unity_Centre_Of_India_COMMUNIST": "Socialist_Unity_Centre_Of_India_COMMUNIST", "Veer_Lakshya_Party": "Veer_Lakshya_Party", "Yuga_Thulasi_Party": "Yuga_Thulasi_Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 90, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 90, "registered_not_positive": 90}, "n_stations_flagged": 90, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:29:32.935934", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.381, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.281, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.281, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 90}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5e97c14222dd4643bde9680e90c544cd", "name": "India 2023 local (overnight india-nagaland-2023-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Nagaland/Nagaland_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"BJP": "BJP", "INC": "INC", "NOTA": "NOTA", "NDPP": "NDPP", "Lok Janshakti Party(Ram Vilas)": "Lok Janshakti Party(Ram Vilas)", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "Janata Dal(United)": "Janata Dal(United)", "NPF": "NPF", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "NCP": "NCP", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "NPP": "NPP", "Independent_7_1": "Independent_7_1", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "Rising People's Party": "Rising People's Party", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "RJD": "RJD", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_40_1": "Independent_40_1", "CPI": "CPI", "Independent_45_1": "Independent_45_1", "Independent_47_1": "Independent_47_1", "Independent_49_1": "Independent_49_1", "Independent_50_1": "Independent_50_1", "Independent_53_1": "Independent_53_1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 60, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 59, "registered_not_positive": 60}, "n_stations_flagged": 60, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:29:29.582290", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.374, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.273, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.283, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.205, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.422, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 60}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8348594357ad4137a928292ae87f6bf4", "name": "India 2023 local (overnight india-mizoram-2023-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.indiavotes.com/vidhan-sabha/mizoram/2023/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"nota": "nota", "ZPM": "ZPM", "MNF": "MNF", "INC": "INC", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "AAP": "AAP", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "BJP": "BJP", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "Independent_37_1": "Independent_37_1", "Independent_31_1": "Independent_31_1", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "Independent_33_1": "Independent_33_1", "Independent_32_1": "Independent_32_1", "Independent_32_2": "Independent_32_2", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "Independent_39_1": "Independent_39_1", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 40, "registered_not_positive": 40}, "n_stations_flagged": 40, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:29:26.621398", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.374, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.273, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.283, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.205, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.422, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 40}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9f25b33dce624ddea42393028a8c55f1", "name": "India 2024 local (overnight india_sikkim_2024_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.eci.gov.in/AcResultGen2ndJune2024/ConstituencywiseS21<1..32>.htm (via Wayback Machine id_ raw snapshots, Nov 2025)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"KAMAL LEPCHA (Indian National Congress)": "KAMAL LEPCHA (Indian National Congress)", "KUNZANG SHERAB BHUTIA (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "KUNZANG SHERAB BHUTIA (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "MEEWANG GYATSO BHUTIA (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "MEEWANG GYATSO BHUTIA (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "TSHERING THENDUP BHUTIA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "TSHERING THENDUP BHUTIA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "JIGMEY BHUTIA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "JIGMEY BHUTIA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "NOTA": "NOTA", "BHIM HANG LIMBOO (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "BHIM HANG LIMBOO (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "KESHAM LIMBOO (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "KESHAM LIMBOO (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "MANGAL SUBBA (LIMBOO) (Indian National Congress)": "MANGAL SUBBA (LIMBOO) (Indian National Congress)", "SANCHA MAN LIMBOO (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "SANCHA MAN LIMBOO (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "PHIP DHOJ LIMBOO (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "PHIP DHOJ LIMBOO (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "NAR BAHADUR GURUNG (Indian National Congress)": "NAR BAHADUR GURUNG (Indian National Congress)", "NARENDRA KUMAR SUBBA (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "NARENDRA KUMAR SUBBA (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "SUDESH KUMAR SUBBA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "SUDESH KUMAR SUBBA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "TIKA RAM CHETTRI (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "TIKA RAM CHETTRI (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "PRAKASH SHARMA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "PRAKASH SHARMA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "BHARAT KUMAR SHARMA (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "BHARAT KUMAR SHARMA (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "LOK NATH SHARMA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "LOK NATH SHARMA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "TIKA PRASAD SHARMA (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "TIKA PRASAD SHARMA (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "PUJAN KHARKA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "PUJAN KHARKA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "ERUNG TENZING LEPCHA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "ERUNG TENZING LEPCHA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "NORDEN BHUTIA (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "NORDEN BHUTIA (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "SANCHO LEPCHA (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "SANCHO LEPCHA (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "DAWA ONGDI LEPCHA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "DAWA ONGDI LEPCHA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "MINGMA NORBU SHERPA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "MINGMA NORBU SHERPA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "PEM NORBU SHERPA (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "PEM NORBU SHERPA (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "PHURBA DORJEE SHERPA (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "PHURBA DORJEE SHERPA (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "PEM DORJEE SHERPA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "PEM DORJEE SHERPA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "PURNA SINGH SUBBA (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "PURNA SINGH SUBBA (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "DR. A D SUBBA (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "DR. A D SUBBA (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "P S TAMANG (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "P S TAMANG (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "POBIN HANG SUBBA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "POBIN HANG SUBBA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "JANGA BIR DARNAL (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "JANGA BIR DARNAL (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "MADAN CINTURY (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "MADAN CINTURY (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "PAHAL MAN KAMI (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "PAHAL MAN KAMI (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "KAUSHAL LOHAGAN (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "KAUSHAL LOHAGAN (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "BHAICHUNG BHUTIA (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "BHAICHUNG BHUTIA (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "RIKSHAL DORJEE BHUTIA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "RIKSHAL DORJEE BHUTIA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "TASHI DADUL BHUTIA (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "TASHI DADUL BHUTIA (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "DADUL LEPCHA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "DADUL LEPCHA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "ARJUN RAI (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "ARJUN RAI (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "BHOJ RAJ RAI (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "BHOJ RAJ RAI (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "PAWAN KUMAR CHAMLING (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "PAWAN KUMAR CHAMLING (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "SANJU RAI (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "SANJU RAI (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "ARUNA MANGER (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "ARUNA MANGER (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "BIMAL RAI (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "BIMAL RAI (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "KRISHNA KUMARI RAI (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "KRISHNA KUMARI RAI (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "MAHESH RAI (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "MAHESH RAI (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "NAR BAHADUR PRADHAN (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "NAR BAHADUR PRADHAN (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "NIRMAL KUMAR PRADHAN (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "NIRMAL KUMAR PRADHAN (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "YOGEN RAI (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "YOGEN RAI (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "GANESH KUMAR RAI (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "GANESH KUMAR RAI (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "JANAK KUMAR GURUNG (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "JANAK KUMAR GURUNG (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "SANJEET KHAREL (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "SANJEET KHAREL (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "SUMAN PRADHAN (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "SUMAN PRADHAN (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "HARI CHANDRA CHETTRI (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "HARI CHANDRA CHETTRI (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "BEDU SINGH PANTH (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "BEDU SINGH PANTH (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "BHUPENDRA GIRI (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "BHUPENDRA GIRI (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "SUMAN KUMAR TEWARI (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "SUMAN KUMAR TEWARI (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "BIKASH SHARMA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "BIKASH SHARMA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "GOPI DAS SHARMA (POKHREL) (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "GOPI DAS SHARMA (POKHREL) (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "MANI KUMAR SUBBA (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "MANI KUMAR SUBBA (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "RAJ KUMARI THAPA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "RAJ KUMARI THAPA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "ANIL KUMAR NEPAL (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "ANIL KUMAR NEPAL (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "NORZONG LEPCHA (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "NORZONG LEPCHA (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "PASSANG GYALI SHERPA (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "PASSANG GYALI SHERPA (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "SAMDUP LEPCHA (Indian National Congress)": "SAMDUP LEPCHA (Indian National Congress)", "SAMDUP TSHERING BHUTIA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "SAMDUP TSHERING BHUTIA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "PEMA GYALPU BHUTIA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "PEMA GYALPU BHUTIA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "CHETAN SAPKOTA (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "CHETAN SAPKOTA (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "MANI KUMAR SHARMA (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "MANI KUMAR SHARMA (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "NAR BAHADUR DAHAL (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "NAR BAHADUR DAHAL (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "TANKA NATH ADHIKARI (Indian National Congress)": "TANKA NATH ADHIKARI (Indian National Congress)", "SUMATI CHETTRI (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "SUMATI CHETTRI (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "ANUP THATAL (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "ANUP THATAL (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "BHUPAL BARAILY (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "BHUPAL BARAILY (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "LALL BAHADUR DAS (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "LALL BAHADUR DAS (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "MADAN KUMAR SHIVA SHANKER (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "MADAN KUMAR SHIVA SHANKER (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "KAPIL PRASAD SAPKOTA (Indian National Congress)": "KAPIL PRASAD SAPKOTA (Indian National Congress)", "PREM CHHETRI (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "PREM CHHETRI (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "SOM NATH POUDYAL (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "SOM NATH POUDYAL (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "LAXMI SHARMA (Sikkim Republican Party)": "LAXMI SHARMA (Sikkim Republican Party)", "TIKA RAM SHARMA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "TIKA RAM SHARMA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "DUK NATH NEPAL (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "DUK NATH NEPAL (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "MANI KUMAR GURUNG (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "MANI KUMAR GURUNG (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "PURAN KR. GURUNG (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "PURAN KR. GURUNG (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "PAMIN LEPCHA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "PAMIN LEPCHA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "SANGAY GYATSO BHUTIA (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "SANGAY GYATSO BHUTIA (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "TSHERING PEMA BHUTIA (Indian National Congress)": "TSHERING PEMA BHUTIA (Indian National Congress)", "TSHERING WANGDI LEPCHA (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "TSHERING WANGDI LEPCHA (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "PHURI SHERPA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "PHURI SHERPA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "POOJA SHARMA (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "POOJA SHARMA (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "RAJU BASNET (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "RAJU BASNET (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "SEVERINE RAI (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "SEVERINE RAI (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "KARMA TASHI BHUTIA (Indian National Congress)": "KARMA TASHI BHUTIA (Indian National Congress)", "KUNGA NIMA LEPCHA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "KUNGA NIMA LEPCHA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "PEMPO DORJEE LEPCHA (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "PEMPO DORJEE LEPCHA (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "TENZING NORBU LAMTHA (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "TENZING NORBU LAMTHA (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "SONAM TSHERING LEPCHA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "SONAM TSHERING LEPCHA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "CHEWANG DADUL BHUTIA (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "CHEWANG DADUL BHUTIA (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "GANGA LEPCHA (Indian National Congress)": "GANGA LEPCHA (Indian National Congress)", "MECHUNG BHUTIA (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "MECHUNG BHUTIA (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "SONAM TSH. VENCHUNGPA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "SONAM TSH. VENCHUNGPA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "KARMA TSHERING BHUTIA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "KARMA TSHERING BHUTIA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "DR. CHANDRA BAHADUR CHETTRI (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "DR. CHANDRA BAHADUR CHETTRI (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "G.T. DHUNGEL (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "G.T. DHUNGEL (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "NIREN BHANDARI (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "NIREN BHANDARI (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "RAVI GURUNG (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "RAVI GURUNG (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "ARUN KUMAR UPRETI (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "ARUN KUMAR UPRETI (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "ASHIS RAI (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "ASHIS RAI (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "SUMITRA RAI (Indian National Congress)": "SUMITRA RAI (Indian National Congress)", "UDAI GURUNG (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "UDAI GURUNG (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "RIKESH PRADHAN (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "RIKESH PRADHAN (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "DELAY NAMGYAL BARFUNGPA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "DELAY NAMGYAL BARFUNGPA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "PEMA WANGYAL RINZING (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "PEMA WANGYAL RINZING (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "PINTSO CHOPEL LEPCHA (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "PINTSO CHOPEL LEPCHA (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "SNUMIT TARGAIN (Indian National Congress)": "SNUMIT TARGAIN (Indian National Congress)", "DAWCHO LEPCHA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "DAWCHO LEPCHA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "AITA TAMANG (Indian National Congress)": "AITA TAMANG (Indian National Congress)", "DIL BAHADUR THAPA (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "DIL BAHADUR THAPA (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "DILLI RAM THAPA (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "DILLI RAM THAPA (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "KALA RAI (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "KALA RAI (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "BHIM KUMAR TAMANG (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "BHIM KUMAR TAMANG (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "GNAWO CHOPEL LEPCHA (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "GNAWO CHOPEL LEPCHA (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "THENLAY TSHERING BHUTIA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "THENLAY TSHERING BHUTIA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "UGEN NEDUP BHUTIA (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "UGEN NEDUP BHUTIA (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "PENZONG LEPCHA (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "PENZONG LEPCHA (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "PINTSO NAMGYAL LEPCHA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "PINTSO NAMGYAL LEPCHA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "SONAM GYATSO LEPCHA (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "SONAM GYATSO LEPCHA (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "JORBU TSHERING LEPCHA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "JORBU TSHERING LEPCHA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)", "HISHEY LACHUNGPA (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "HISHEY LACHUNGPA (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "SAMDUP LEPCHA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "SAMDUP LEPCHA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "SONAM LAMA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)": "SONAM LAMA (Sikkim Krantikari Morcha)", "TSETEN TASHI BHUTIA (Bharatiya Janata Party)": "TSETEN TASHI BHUTIA (Bharatiya Janata Party)", "TSHERING LAMA (Sikkim Democratic Front)": "TSHERING LAMA (Sikkim Democratic Front)", "NORCHO LEPCHA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)": "NORCHO LEPCHA (Citizen Action Party-Sikkim)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 32, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 32, "cast_gt_registered": 32}, "n_stations_flagged": 32, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:29:25.477266", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.381, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.281, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.281, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 32}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1cba95eadfa947d9b32b18f76d034b32", "name": "India 2021 local (overnight india-puducherry-2021-assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Puducherry/Puducherry_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"BJP_1": "BJP_1", "DMK_1": "DMK_1", "NTK_1": "NTK_1", "NOTA_1": "NOTA_1", "MNM_1": "MNM_1", "Independent_1_1": "Independent_1_1", "BSP_1": "BSP_1", "DMDK_1": "DMDK_1", "AMMK_1": "AMMK_1", "Independent_1_2": "Independent_1_2", "Independent_1_3": "Independent_1_3", "Independent_1_4": "Independent_1_4", "Independent_1_5": "Independent_1_5", "Independent_1_6": "Independent_1_6", "Independent_2_1": "Independent_2_1", "AINRC_2": "AINRC_2", "DMK_2": "DMK_2", "NTK_2": "NTK_2", "MNM_2": "MNM_2", "NOTA_2": "NOTA_2", "AMMK_2": "AMMK_2", "Independent_2_2": "Independent_2_2", "DMDK_2": "DMDK_2", "IJK_2": "IJK_2", "Independent_2_3": "Independent_2_3", "Independent_2_4": "Independent_2_4", "BSP_2": "BSP_2", "Independent_2_5": "Independent_2_5", "BJP_3": "BJP_3", "INC_3": "INC_3", "NTK_3": "NTK_3", "AMMK_3": "AMMK_3", "NOTA_3": "NOTA_3", "Independent_3_1": "Independent_3_1", "MNM_3": "MNM_3", "Independent_3_2": "Independent_3_2", "DMDK_3": "DMDK_3", "Independent_3_3": "Independent_3_3", "Independent_3_4": "Independent_3_4", "IJK_3": "IJK_3", "AINRC_4": "AINRC_4", "DMK_4": "DMK_4", "NTK_4": "NTK_4", "NOTA_4": "NOTA_4", "MNM_4": "MNM_4", "Independent_4_1": "Independent_4_1", "AMMK_4": "AMMK_4", "BSP_4": "BSP_4", "DMDK_4": "DMDK_4", "Independent_4_2": "Independent_4_2", "Independent_4_3": "Independent_4_3", "IJK_4": "IJK_4", "DMK_5": "DMK_5", "AINRC_5": "AINRC_5", "NTK_5": "NTK_5", "MNM_5": "MNM_5", "NOTA_5": "NOTA_5", "AMMK_5": "AMMK_5", "Independent_5_1": "Independent_5_1", "Puducherry_Development_Party_5": "Puducherry_Development_Party_5", "Independent_5_2": "Independent_5_2", "Independent_5_3": "Independent_5_3", "DMDK_5": "DMDK_5", "Independent_5_4": "Independent_5_4", "Independent_5_5": "Independent_5_5", "JD_U_5": "JD_U_5", "Independent_5_6": "Independent_5_6", "IJK_5": "IJK_5", "Independent_6_1": "Independent_6_1", "AINRC_6": "AINRC_6", "VCK_6": "VCK_6", "MNM_6": "MNM_6", "NTK_6": "NTK_6", "NOTA_6": "NOTA_6", "Independent_6_2": "Independent_6_2", "Independent_6_3": "Independent_6_3", "CPI_ML_L_6": "CPI_ML_L_6", "AMMK_6": "AMMK_6", "Independent_6_4": "Independent_6_4", "Independent_6_5": "Independent_6_5", "BSP_6": "BSP_6", "DMDK_6": "DMDK_6", "Puducherry_Development_Party_6": "Puducherry_Development_Party_6", "JD_U_6": "JD_U_6", "IJK_6": "IJK_6", "AINRC_7": "AINRC_7", "INC_7": "INC_7", "NTK_7": "NTK_7", "NOTA_7": "NOTA_7", "DMDK_7": "DMDK_7", "AMMK_7": "AMMK_7", "IJK_7": "IJK_7", "AINRC_8": "AINRC_8", "INC_8": "INC_8", "NTK_8": "NTK_8", "MNM_8": "MNM_8", "NOTA_8": "NOTA_8", "DMDK_8": "DMDK_8", "IJK_8": "IJK_8", "Independent_8_1": "Independent_8_1", "AMMK_8": "AMMK_8", "AINRC_9": "AINRC_9", "CPI_9": "CPI_9", "NTK_9": "NTK_9", "MNM_9": "MNM_9", "NOTA_9": "NOTA_9", "Independent_9_1": "Independent_9_1", "DMDK_9": "DMDK_9", "AMMK_9": "AMMK_9", "Independent_9_2": "Independent_9_2", "Independent_9_3": "Independent_9_3", "IJK_9": "IJK_9", "BJP_10": "BJP_10", "INC_10": "INC_10", "NTK_10": "NTK_10", "NOTA_10": "NOTA_10", "AMMK_10": "AMMK_10", "Independent_10_1": "Independent_10_1", "DMDK_10": "DMDK_10", "Independent_10_2": "Independent_10_2", "Independent_10_3": "Independent_10_3", "Independent_10_4": "Independent_10_4", "INC_11": "INC_11", "BJP_11": "BJP_11", "NTK_11": "NTK_11", "MNM_11": "MNM_11", "NOTA_11": "NOTA_11", "DMDK_11": "DMDK_11", "AMMK_11": "AMMK_11", "Independent_11_1": "Independent_11_1", "Independent_11_2": "Independent_11_2", "IJK_11": "IJK_11", "Independent_11_3": "Independent_11_3", "Independent_11_4": "Independent_11_4", "BJP_12": "BJP_12", "Independent_12_1": "Independent_12_1", "DMK_12": "DMK_12", "NTK_12": "NTK_12", "MNM_12": "MNM_12", "NOTA_12": "NOTA_12", "DMDK_12": "DMDK_12", "Independent_12_2": "Independent_12_2", "Independent_12_3": "Independent_12_3", "Independent_12_4": "Independent_12_4", "AMMK_12": "AMMK_12", "Independent_12_5": "Independent_12_5", "Independent_12_6": "Independent_12_6", "Independent_13_1": "Independent_13_1", "ADMK_13": "ADMK_13", "INC_13": "INC_13", "NTK_13": "NTK_13", "MNM_13": "MNM_13", "CPM_13": "CPM_13", "NOTA_13": "NOTA_13", "DMDK_13": "DMDK_13", "BSP_13": "BSP_13", "AMMK_13": "AMMK_13", "Independent_13_2": "Independent_13_2", "Independent_13_3": "Independent_13_3", "AINRC_14": "AINRC_14", "DMK_14": "DMK_14", "MNM_14": "MNM_14", "NTK_14": "NTK_14", "NOTA_14": "NOTA_14", "Independent_14_1": "Independent_14_1", "Independent_14_2": "Independent_14_2", "AMMK_14": "AMMK_14", "Independent_14_3": "Independent_14_3", "DMK_15": "DMK_15", "ADMK_15": "ADMK_15", "MNM_15": "MNM_15", "NTK_15": "NTK_15", "NOTA_15": "NOTA_15", "BSP_15": "BSP_15", "AMMK_15": "AMMK_15", "Independent_15_1": "Independent_15_1", "Independent_15_2": "Independent_15_2", "DMDK_15": "DMDK_15", "Independent_15_3": "Independent_15_3", "IJK_15": "IJK_15", "Independent_16_1": "Independent_16_1", "DMK_16": "DMK_16", "ADMK_16": "ADMK_16", "NTK_16": "NTK_16", "MNM_16": "MNM_16", "NOTA_16": "NOTA_16", "Independent_16_2": "Independent_16_2", "Puratchi_Bharatham_16": "Puratchi_Bharatham_16", "Independent_16_3": "Independent_16_3", "DMDK_16": "DMDK_16", "AMMK_16": "AMMK_16", "Independent_16_4": "Independent_16_4", "Independent_16_5": "Independent_16_5", "Independent_16_6": "Independent_16_6", "IJK_16": "IJK_16", "Independent_16_7": "Independent_16_7", "BJP_17": "BJP_17", "DMK_17": "DMK_17", "MNM_17": "MNM_17", "NTK_17": "NTK_17", "NOTA_17": "NOTA_17", "Independent_17_1": "Independent_17_1", "My_India_Party_17": "My_India_Party_17", "Independent_17_2": "Independent_17_2", "SDPI_17": "SDPI_17", "Independent_17_3": "Independent_17_3", "DMDK_17": "DMDK_17", "Independent_17_4": "Independent_17_4", "Independent_17_5": "Independent_17_5", "Puducherry_Development_Party_17": "Puducherry_Development_Party_17", "IJK_17": "IJK_17", "JD_U_17": "JD_U_17", "Independent_17_6": "Independent_17_6", "DMK_18": "DMK_18", "ADMK_18": "ADMK_18", "MNM_18": "MNM_18", "NTK_18": "NTK_18", "NOTA_18": "NOTA_18", "AMMK_18": "AMMK_18", "Independent_18_1": "Independent_18_1", "Independent_18_2": "Independent_18_2", "IJK_18": "IJK_18", "Independent_18_3": "Independent_18_3", "Independent_18_4": "Independent_18_4", "Independent_18_5": "Independent_18_5", "Independent_18_6": "Independent_18_6", "AINRC_19": "AINRC_19", "INC_19": "INC_19", "NTK_19": "NTK_19", "MNM_19": "MNM_19", "Independent_19_1": "Independent_19_1", "NOTA_19": "NOTA_19", "SDPI_19": "SDPI_19", "DMDK_19": "DMDK_19", "IJK_19": "IJK_19", "Independent_19_2": "Independent_19_2", "BJP_20": "BJP_20", "INC_20": "INC_20", "NTK_20": "NTK_20", "Independent_20_1": "Independent_20_1", "MNM_20": "MNM_20", "NOTA_20": "NOTA_20", "BSP_20": "BSP_20", "Independent_20_2": "Independent_20_2", "DMDK_20": "DMDK_20", "AMMK_20": "AMMK_20", "IJK_20": "IJK_20", "AINRC_21": "AINRC_21", "INC_21": "INC_21", "MNM_21": "MNM_21", "NTK_21": "NTK_21", "NOTA_21": "NOTA_21", "DMDK_21": "DMDK_21", "BSP_21": "BSP_21", "Independent_21_1": "Independent_21_1", "IJK_21": "IJK_21", "AINRC_22": "AINRC_22", "INC_22": "INC_22", "NTK_22": "NTK_22", "Independent_22_1": "Independent_22_1", "Independent_22_2": "Independent_22_2", "NOTA_22": "NOTA_22", "AMMK_22": "AMMK_22", "MNM_22": "MNM_22", "BSP_22": "BSP_22", "IJK_22": "IJK_22", "JD_U_22": "JD_U_22", "DMK_23": "DMK_23", "AINRC_23": "AINRC_23", "AMMK_23": "AMMK_23", "Independent_23_1": "Independent_23_1", "NTK_23": "NTK_23", "NOTA_23": "NOTA_23", "MNM_23": "MNM_23", "DMDK_23": "DMDK_23", "Independent_23_2": "Independent_23_2", "Independent_23_3": "Independent_23_3", "Independent_23_4": "Independent_23_4", "Independent_23_5": "Independent_23_5", "Puducherry_Development_Party_23": "Puducherry_Development_Party_23", "IJK_23": "IJK_23", "AINRC_24": "AINRC_24", "INC_24": "INC_24", "Independent_24_1": "Independent_24_1", "NTK_24": "NTK_24", "NOTA_24": "NOTA_24", "Independent_24_2": "Independent_24_2", "DMDK_24": "DMDK_24", "AMMK_24": "AMMK_24", "BSP_24": "BSP_24", "Independent_24_3": "Independent_24_3", "Independent_25_1": "Independent_25_1", "BJP_25": "BJP_25", "INC_25": "INC_25", "NTK_25": "NTK_25", "NOTA_25": "NOTA_25", "DMDK_25": "DMDK_25", "Independent_25_2": "Independent_25_2", "Independent_25_3": "Independent_25_3", "Independent_25_4": "Independent_25_4", "AMMK_25": "AMMK_25", "AINRC_26": "AINRC_26", "INC_26": "INC_26", "NTK_26": "NTK_26", "Independent_26_1": "Independent_26_1", "MNM_26": "MNM_26", "NOTA_26": "NOTA_26", "SDPI_26": "SDPI_26", "Independent_26_2": "Independent_26_2", "DMDK_26": "DMDK_26", "IJK_26": "IJK_26", "Independent_26_3": "Independent_26_3", "DMK_27": "DMK_27", "ADMK_27": "ADMK_27", "NTK_27": "NTK_27", "Independent_27_1": "Independent_27_1", "NOTA_27": "NOTA_27", "AMMK_27": "AMMK_27", "Independent_27_2": "Independent_27_2", "IJK_27": "IJK_27", "DMDK_27": "DMDK_27", "DMK_28": "DMK_28", "BJP_28": "BJP_28", "Independent_28_1": "Independent_28_1", "NTK_28": "NTK_28", "NOTA_28": "NOTA_28", "Independent_28_2": "Independent_28_2", "Independent_28_3": "Independent_28_3", "DMDK_28": "DMDK_28", "AMMK_28": "AMMK_28", "IJK_28": "IJK_28", "INC_29": "INC_29", "Independent_29_1": "Independent_29_1", "AINRC_29": "AINRC_29", "SDPI_29": "SDPI_29", "NOTA_29": "NOTA_29", "DMDK_29": "DMDK_29", "Independent_29_2": "Independent_29_2", "Independent_30_1": "Independent_30_1", "AINRC_30": "AINRC_30", "Independent_30_2": "Independent_30_2", "Independent_30_3": "Independent_30_3", "Independent_30_4": "Independent_30_4", "NOTA_30": "NOTA_30", "Independent_30_5": "Independent_30_5", "Independent_30_6": "Independent_30_6", "AMMK_30": "AMMK_30", "BSP_30": "BSP_30", "Independent_30_7": "Independent_30_7", "Independent_30_8": "Independent_30_8", "Independent_30_9": "Independent_30_9", "Independent_30_10": "Independent_30_10", "Independent_30_11": "Independent_30_11", "Independent_30_12": "Independent_30_12"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 30, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 30, "registered_not_positive": 30}, "n_stations_flagged": 30, "created_at": "2026-07-07T01:29:23.695320", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.398, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.307, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.398, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.398, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.307, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.307, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.234, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.234, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.687, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.466, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.466, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 30}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "700f65f097fd4b5f88383a00d18fd66a", "name": "Mexico 2024 local (overnight mexico_benitojuarez_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://computos2024.ieqroo.org.mx/escritorio/  (asset: /assets/json/ayuntamientos_1_seccion_casilla_acta.json ; consejo id_consejo=1 = Benito Juarez)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Ana_Patricia_Peralta_PVEM_PT_MORENA": "Ana_Patricia_Peralta_PVEM_PT_MORENA", "Jorge_Rodriguez_Mendez_PAN_PRI": "Jorge_Rodriguez_Mendez_PAN_PRI", "Jesus_Pool_Moo_MC": "Jesus_Pool_Moo_MC", "Daniela_Vara_Solis_PRD": "Daniela_Vara_Solis_PRD", "Paula_Villanueva_Rosado_MAS": "Paula_Villanueva_Rosado_MAS", "candidaturas_no_registradas": "candidaturas_no_registradas"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1181, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 484}, "n_stations_flagged": 484, "created_at": "2026-07-07T00:58:45.054014", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1181}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6416ea778c2d4a5ba1402355868e5b10", "name": "Mexico 2024 local (overnight mexico_toluca_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.ieem.org.mx/assets/docs/procesos-electorales/resultados/2024/Ayuntamientos/Resultados_definitivos_ayu_casilla.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Ricardo_Moreno_Bastida_MORENA_PVEM_PT": "Ricardo_Moreno_Bastida_MORENA_PVEM_PT", "Melissa_Vargas_Camacho_PAN_PRI_PRD_NAEM": "Melissa_Vargas_Camacho_PAN_PRI_PRD_NAEM", "Francisco_Rodriguez_Albarran_MC": "Francisco_Rodriguez_Albarran_MC"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1126, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 4, "cast_gt_registered": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-07-07T00:58:41.278922", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1126}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6a10786bd438430ca27f944b8582b488", "name": "Mexico 2024 local (overnight mexico-morelia-2024-mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://iem.org.mx/public/uploads/docs_procesos_electorales/1000370-ayuntamiento_69a5c97c1f4a6.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"alfonso_martinez_pan_prd": "alfonso_martinez_pan_prd", "jhh_morena_pt_pvem": "jhh_morena_pt_pvem", "pri": "pri", "mc": "mc", "pesm": "pesm", "tmx": "tmx"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1110, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 13, "registered_not_positive": 13}, "n_stations_flagged": 13, "created_at": "2026-07-07T00:58:37.722458", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1110}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bf9ee9f3cfc741cf98e6ea75abb9d036", "name": "India 2024 local (overnight india_maharashtra_2024_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.opencity.in/dataset/maharashtra-assembly-elections-2024-results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"aimim": "aimim", "bjp": "bjp", "bsp": "bsp", "cpim": "cpim", "inc": "inc", "independent": "independent", "jss": "jss", "mns": "mns", "ncp_ajit": "ncp_ajit", "ncp_sp": "ncp_sp", "nota": "nota", "other_parties": "other_parties", "pwpi": "pwpi", "rsp": "rsp", "rsva": "rsva", "rysp": "rysp", "shivsena_shinde": "shivsena_shinde", "shivsena_ubt": "shivsena_ubt", "sp": "sp", "vba": "vba"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 288, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 288, "registered_not_positive": 288}, "n_stations_flagged": 288, "created_at": "2026-07-07T00:58:36.089089", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.381, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.281, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.281, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 288}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f9c6bb7e2c7e44aeb71b0ecb49b91c8a", "name": "India 2023 local (overnight india_madhya_pradesh_2023_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ceomadhyapradesh.nic.in/Election2023/10-Detailed%20Results%20(2).pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"party_AAAP": "party_AAAP", "party_AACP": "party_AACP", "party_AAPP": "party_AAPP", "party_ABASP": "party_ABASP", "party_AHBCD": "party_AHBCD", "party_AIFB": "party_AIFB", "party_AIMIM": "party_AIMIM", "party_AKBHAD": "party_AKBHAD", "party_AKNDBRTSMR": "party_AKNDBRTSMR", "party_AMBHRTP": "party_AMBHRTP", "party_ANSP": "party_ANSP", "party_APKGNTRP": "party_APKGNTRP", "party_APoI": "party_APoI", "party_ASPKR": "party_ASPKR", "party_AZSP": "party_AZSP", "party_AaSamP": "party_AaSamP", "party_BGDRPP": "party_BGDRPP", "party_BGVP": "party_BGVP", "party_BGWP": "party_BGWP", "party_BHJMP": "party_BHJMP", "party_BHRTADVSIP": "party_BHRTADVSIP", "party_BHRTGNRJP": "party_BHRTGNRJP", "party_BHRTSBHTP": "party_BHRTSBHTP", "party_BHUDRP": "party_BHUDRP", "party_BJP": "party_BJP", "party_BKSP": "party_BKSP", "party_BMJP": "party_BMJP", "party_BMUP": "party_BMUP", "party_BRAPMND": "party_BRAPMND", "party_BRTSRNMYGP": "party_BRTSRNMYGP", "party_BSCP": "party_BSCP", "party_BSKRP": "party_BSKRP", "party_BSP": "party_BSP", "party_BSaP": "party_BSaP", "party_BTP": "party_BTP", "party_BVD": "party_BVD", "party_CPI": "party_CPI", "party_CPI_M_": "party_CPI_M_", "party_GGP": "party_GGP", "party_GNASURKP": "party_GNASURKP", "party_INC": "party_INC", "party_IND": "party_IND", "party_INDPPLSADH": "party_INDPPLSADH", "party_JAC": "party_JAC", "party_JANADIP": "party_JANADIP", "party_JASP": "party_JASP", "party_JD_U_": "party_JD_U_", "party_JKiP": "party_JKiP", "party_JLokP": "party_JLokP", "party_JNSGNDWP": "party_JNSGNDWP", "party_JPJD": "party_JPJD", "party_JSDP": "party_JSDP", "party_KRJAP": "party_KRJAP", "party_LJPRV": "party_LJPRV", "party_LSMP": "party_LSMP", "party_LSWP": "party_LSWP", "party_LTSP": "party_LTSP", "party_MKRP": "party_MKRP", "party_MLCNG": "party_MLCNG", "party_MPJVP": "party_MPJVP", "party_NDS": "party_NDS", "party_NJP": "party_NJP", "party_NNS": "party_NNS", "party_NOTA": "party_NOTA", "party_NVDYJP": "party_NVDYJP", "party_NWLP": "party_NWLP", "party_NYP": "party_NYP", "party_PBI": "party_PBI", "party_PHJSP": "party_PHJSP", "party_PPID": "party_PPID", "party_PRVPOI": "party_PRVPOI", "party_PSJP": "party_PSJP", "party_PSPU": "party_PSPU", "party_PuPP": "party_PuPP", "party_RGOP": "party_RGOP", "party_RKSP": "party_RKSP", "party_RMGP": "party_RMGP", "party_RPI_A_": "party_RPI_A_", "party_RRSM": "party_RRSM", "party_RSHTNP": "party_RSHTNP", "party_RSHTPRTBAP": "party_RSHTPRTBAP", "party_RSMD": "party_RSMD", "party_RSPS": "party_RSPS", "party_RSTWDIBHRT": "party_RSTWDIBHRT", "party_RTJAWP": "party_RTJAWP", "party_RTJSD": "party_RTJSD", "party_RTORP": "party_RTORP", "party_RaNP": "party_RaNP", "party_SADSP": "party_SADSP", "party_SAJD": "party_SAJD", "party_SDP_MP_": "party_SDP_MP_", "party_SDPI": "party_SDPI", "party_SMARTIP": "party_SMARTIP", "party_SMTMLOKSMJ": "party_SMTMLOKSMJ", "party_SNJSP": "party_SNJSP", "party_SP": "party_SP", "party_SPAKP": "party_SPAKP", "party_SUCI": "party_SUCI", "party_SWAJANPA": "party_SWAJANPA", "party_SWJP": "party_SWJP", "party_SYKTKP": "party_SYKTKP", "party_SaSP": "party_SaSP", "party_SamSP": "party_SamSP", "party_UNP": "party_UNP", "party_VBA": "party_VBA", "party_VBP": "party_VBP", "party_VINPA": "party_VINPA", "party_VNDHYJNTP": "party_VNDHYJNTP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 230, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-07T00:58:34.479969", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.374, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.273, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.283, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.205, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.422, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 230}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1b6b1ce3b1724ca2bc7b049e04cbae4a", "name": "India 2023 local (overnight india_rajasthan_2023_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"winner_votes": "winner_votes", "AAAP": "AAAP", "AADMPRVTNP": "AADMPRVTNP", "ABCD(A)": "ABCD(A)", "AIMIM": "AIMIM", "AKBAP": "AKBAP", "ALP": "ALP", "AMJNMTP": "AMJNMTP", "APoI": "APoI", "ARJP": "ARJP", "ASPKR": "ASPKR", "ASSP": "ASSP", "BHNKP": "BHNKP", "BHRTADVSIP": "BHRTADVSIP", "BHTJP": "BHTJP", "BHYUJEP": "BHYUJEP", "BJP": "BJP", "BJSTP": "BJSTP", "BLokSP": "BLokSP", "BMAP": "BMAP", "BMUP": "BMUP", "BPLP": "BPLP", "BSP": "BSP", "BSSPA": "BSSPA", "BSSSSP": "BSSSSP", "BTC": "BTC", "BTP": "BTP", "BaJD": "BaJD", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI(M)": "CPI(M)", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "GNASURKP": "GNASURKP", "HJP": "HJP", "IICR": "IICR", "INC": "INC", "IND": "IND", "IPGP": "IPGP", "JAC": "JAC", "JASP": "JASP", "JHNDCGP": "JHNDCGP", "JMBP": "JMBP", "JNJP": "JNJP", "JSR": "JSR", "JSVP": "JSVP", "LJPRV": "LJPRV", "LOKJANP": "LOKJANP", "MCPI": "MCPI", "MKAD": "MKAD", "NHP": "NHP", "NJMP": "NJMP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "PHCPP": "PHCPP", "PLBP": "PLBP", "PPID": "PPID", "PRVPOI": "PRVPOI", "PuPP": "PuPP", "RBD": "RBD", "RDF": "RDF", "RJAVP": "RJAVP", "RJVP": "RJVP", "RLD": "RLD", "RLTP": "RLTP", "RPI": "RPI", "RPPRINAT": "RPPRINAT", "RRP": "RRP", "RSD": "RSD", "RSHTRJNTS": "RSHTRJNTS", "RSTJNSRYP": "RSTJNSRYP", "RSTWDIBHRT": "RSTWDIBHRT", "RTORP": "RTORP", "RVyP": "RVyP", "RaJPa": "RaJPa", "SAD(M)": "SAD(M)", "SDPI": "SDPI", "SHS": "SHS", "SMBSP": "SMBSP", "SP": "SP", "SWNTRABYKT": "SWNTRABYKT", "UMEDPI": "UMEDPI", "VM": "VM", "WPOI": "WPOI", "nafp": "nafp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 200, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 200, "cast_gt_registered": 200}, "n_stations_flagged": 200, "created_at": "2026-07-07T00:58:32.734310", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.374, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.273, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.283, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.205, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.422, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 200}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5cf99d1f0f0e47759e4fd3f2bea6a287", "name": "India 2022 local (overnight india_gujarat_2022_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Gujarat/Gujarat_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"BJP": "BJP", "INC": "INC", "AAP": "AAP", "BSP": "BSP", "SP": "SP", "AIMIM": "AIMIM", "NOTA": "NOTA", "OTHERS": "OTHERS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 182, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 182, "registered_not_positive": 182}, "n_stations_flagged": 182, "created_at": "2026-07-07T00:58:30.979746", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.384, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.291, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.384, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.384, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.291, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.291, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.553, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.764, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.442, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 182}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a613d9146abd41218b56b3e129cb6cb5", "name": "India 2023 local (overnight india_telangana_2023_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.opencity.in/dataset/telangana-elections-2023-results/resource/3632e39e-63c6-4d2f-b240-5decb915f4d0/download/detailed_results.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"INC": "INC", "BHRS": "BHRS", "BJP": "BJP", "AIMIM": "AIMIM", "IND": "IND", "BSP": "BSP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "AIFB": "AIFB", "CPI": "CPI", "AODRP": "AODRP", "JnP": "JnP", "CPI(M)": "CPI(M)", "OTHERS": "OTHERS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 119, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-07T00:58:29.916911", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.374, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.273, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.283, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.205, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.422, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 119}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7108e441bff74a78977f3015bfcb093b", "name": "India 2024 local (overnight india_jammu_kashmir_2024_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.eci.gov.in/AcResultGenOct2024/ConstituencywiseU081.htm", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Aam Aadmi Party": "Aam Aadmi Party", "Aazad Samaj Party (Kanshi Ram)": "Aazad Samaj Party (Kanshi Ram)", "All India Forward Bloc": "All India Forward Bloc", "All Jammu & Kashmir Liberal Democratic Party": "All Jammu & Kashmir Liberal Democratic Party", "Aman Aur Shanti Tehreek-E-Jammu & Kashmir": "Aman Aur Shanti Tehreek-E-Jammu & Kashmir", "Anarakshit Samaj Party": "Anarakshit Samaj Party", "Azad Samaj Party": "Azad Samaj Party", "Bahujan Samaj Party": "Bahujan Samaj Party", "Bharat Jodo Party": "Bharat Jodo Party", "Bharatiya Janata Party": "Bharatiya Janata Party", "Bharatiya Sampuran Krantikari Party": "Bharatiya Sampuran Krantikari Party", "Bhim Sena": "Bhim Sena", "Communist Party of India  (Marxist)": "Communist Party of India  (Marxist)", "Democratic Progressive Azad Party": "Democratic Progressive Azad Party", "Garib Democratic Party": "Garib Democratic Party", "Haq Insaaf Party": "Haq Insaaf Party", "Hindustan Shakti Sena": "Hindustan Shakti Sena", "Independent - AADIL NAZIR KHAN": "Independent - AADIL NAZIR KHAN", "Independent - AADIL RASHID BHAT": "Independent - AADIL RASHID BHAT", "Independent - AAFAQ SADIQ": "Independent - AAFAQ SADIQ", "Independent - AAQIB MUSHTAQ GANIE": "Independent - AAQIB MUSHTAQ GANIE", "Independent - AASIF AHMAD KHAN": "Independent - AASIF AHMAD KHAN", "Independent - AASIFUL HASSAN": "Independent - AASIFUL HASSAN", "Independent - ABDUL MAJEED SHEIKH": "Independent - ABDUL MAJEED SHEIKH", "Independent - ABDUL MAJID BANDAY": "Independent - ABDUL MAJID BANDAY", "Independent - ABDUL QUYOOM MIR": "Independent - ABDUL QUYOOM MIR", "Independent - ABDUL RASHID GOJJER": "Independent - ABDUL RASHID GOJJER", "Independent - ABDUL REHMAN SHALLA": "Independent - ABDUL REHMAN SHALLA", "Independent - ABDUL ROUF NAIK": "Independent - ABDUL ROUF NAIK", "Independent - ABRAR AHMAD GOJJAR": "Independent - ABRAR AHMAD GOJJAR", "Independent - ADIL HUSSAIN DAR": "Independent - ADIL HUSSAIN DAR", "Independent - AFROOZA BANOO": "Independent - AFROOZA BANOO", "Independent - AIJAZ AHMAD GANAI": "Independent - AIJAZ AHMAD GANAI", "Independent - AIJAZ AHMAD GUROO": "Independent - AIJAZ AHMAD GUROO", "Independent - AIJAZ AHMAD KHAN": "Independent - AIJAZ AHMAD KHAN", "Independent - AIJAZ AHMAD MIR": "Independent - AIJAZ AHMAD MIR", "Independent - AJAY KUMAR": "Independent - AJAY KUMAR", "Independent - AJAY SINGH SAINI": "Independent - AJAY SINGH SAINI", "Independent - AJAZ AHMAD SOFI": "Independent - AJAZ AHMAD SOFI", "Independent - AKASH SINGH SLATHIA": "Independent - AKASH SINGH SLATHIA", "Independent - ALI MOHMMAD WANI": "Independent - ALI MOHMMAD WANI", "Independent - AMIT KAPOOR": "Independent - AMIT KAPOOR", "Independent - AMOOD GULZAR": "Independent - AMOOD GULZAR", "Independent - AMRISH JASROTIA": "Independent - AMRISH JASROTIA", "Independent - ANIL KHAJURIA": "Independent - ANIL KHAJURIA", "Independent - ANIL KUMAR": "Independent - ANIL KUMAR", "Independent - ANOOP KUMAR": "Independent - ANOOP KUMAR", "Independent - ANWAR JAAN": "Independent - ANWAR JAAN", "Independent - ARJUN SINGH": "Independent - ARJUN SINGH", "Independent - ARSHAD AHMED": "Independent - ARSHAD AHMED", "Independent - ARTI NEHRU": "Independent - ARTI NEHRU", "Independent - ASHIQ AHMAD SHEIKH": "Independent - ASHIQ AHMAD SHEIKH", "Independent - ASHOK SHAIB": "Independent - ASHOK SHAIB", "Independent - ASIF AHMAD BEIGH": "Independent - ASIF AHMAD BEIGH", "Independent - ASIF D.M": "Independent - ASIF D.M", "Independent - ASIF NABI DAR": "Independent - ASIF NABI DAR", "Independent - ASTKHAR ALI AHMED": "Independent - ASTKHAR ALI AHMED", "Independent - ATUL RAINA": "Independent - ATUL RAINA", "Independent - BALKEES AKHTER": "Independent - BALKEES AKHTER", "Independent - BALWAN SINGH": "Independent - BALWAN SINGH", "Independent - BANSI LAL": "Independent - BANSI LAL", "Independent - BASHIR AHMAD KHARI": "Independent - BASHIR AHMAD KHARI", "Independent - BASHIR AHMED SHAN": "Independent - BASHIR AHMED SHAN", "Independent - BHANU PARTAP SINGH": "Independent - BHANU PARTAP SINGH", "Independent - BILAL AHMAD BHAT": "Independent - BILAL AHMAD BHAT", "Independent - BILAL AHMAD MIR": "Independent - BILAL AHMAD MIR", "Independent - BILAL AHMAD WANI": "Independent - BILAL AHMAD WANI", "Independent - BILAL KHAN": "Independent - BILAL KHAN", "Independent - BRIJESHWAR SINGH": "Independent - BRIJESHWAR SINGH", "Independent - BURHAN BASHEER BAZAZ": "Independent - BURHAN BASHEER BAZAZ", "Independent - CHAIN SINGH": "Independent - CHAIN SINGH", "Independent - CHANDER MOHAN SHARMA": "Independent - CHANDER MOHAN SHARMA", "Independent - CHOUDHARY MOHAMMED AKRAM": "Independent - CHOUDHARY MOHAMMED AKRAM", "Independent - DAWOOD BASHIR BHAT": "Independent - DAWOOD BASHIR BHAT", "Independent - DEV RAJ SINGH": "Independent - DEV RAJ SINGH", "Independent - DIKSHA KALURIA": "Independent - DIKSHA KALURIA", "Independent - DILIP KUMAR PANDITA": "Independent - DILIP KUMAR PANDITA", "Independent - DR FAROOZ  AHMAD GANAI": "Independent - DR FAROOZ  AHMAD GANAI", "Independent - DR HANS RAJ BHARADWAJ": "Independent - DR HANS RAJ BHARADWAJ", "Independent - DR ISHFAQ AHMED CHODHARY": "Independent - DR ISHFAQ AHMED CHODHARY", "Independent - DR PREETI KUMARI": "Independent - DR PREETI KUMARI", "Independent - DR RAMESHWAR SINGH": "Independent - DR RAMESHWAR SINGH", "Independent - FAISAL FAYAZ": "Independent - FAISAL FAYAZ", "Independent - FAIZ  AHMAD BHAT": "Independent - FAIZ  AHMAD BHAT", "Independent - FAIZ HUSSAIN": "Independent - FAIZ HUSSAIN", "Independent - FAIZAN RAHI": "Independent - FAIZAN RAHI", "Independent - FAROOQ AHMAD BHAT": "Independent - FAROOQ AHMAD BHAT", "Independent - FAROOQ AHMAD GANAIE": "Independent - FAROOQ AHMAD GANAIE", "Independent - FAYAZ AHMAD": "Independent - FAYAZ AHMAD", "Independent - FAYAZ AHMAD BUTT": "Independent - FAYAZ AHMAD BUTT", "Independent - FAYAZ AHMAD KHANDAY": "Independent - FAYAZ AHMAD KHANDAY", "Independent - FEROZ AHMAD NAJAR": "Independent - FEROZ AHMAD NAJAR", "Independent - GANPATI SHARMA": "Independent - GANPATI SHARMA", "Independent - GAZANFAR ALI": "Independent - GAZANFAR ALI", "Independent - GH NABI KHAN PATHAN": "Independent - GH NABI KHAN PATHAN", "Independent - GHULAM HASAN MALIK": "Independent - GHULAM HASAN MALIK", "Independent - GHULAM MOHD SAROORI": "Independent - GHULAM MOHD SAROORI", "Independent - GHULAM NABI BHAT": "Independent - GHULAM NABI BHAT", "Independent - GHULAM NABI PARRAY": "Independent - GHULAM NABI PARRAY", "Independent - GHULAM QADIR SHAH": "Independent - GHULAM QADIR SHAH", "Independent - GHULAM RASOOL": "Independent - GHULAM RASOOL", "Independent - GHULAM RASOOL MIR": "Independent - GHULAM RASOOL MIR", "Independent - GULSHAN AKHTER": "Independent - GULSHAN AKHTER", "Independent - GULZAR AHMAD KHATANA": "Independent - GULZAR AHMAD KHATANA", "Independent - HAJI FAROOQ AHMAD MIR": "Independent - HAJI FAROOQ AHMAD MIR", "Independent - HARBAKSH SINGH SASSAN": "Independent - HARBAKSH SINGH SASSAN", "Independent - HARBANS LAL": "Independent - HARBANS LAL", "Independent - HEMKANT SHARMA": "Independent - HEMKANT SHARMA", "Independent - HILAL AHMAD MALIK": "Independent - HILAL AHMAD MALIK", "Independent - IMRAN SHEIKH": "Independent - IMRAN SHEIKH", "Independent - IMTIYAZ AHMAD KHAN": "Independent - IMTIYAZ AHMAD KHAN", "Independent - IMTIYAZ AHMAD RATHER": "Independent - IMTIYAZ AHMAD RATHER", "Independent - IMTIYAZ BASHIR": "Independent - IMTIYAZ BASHIR", "Independent - INAM HUSSAIN": "Independent - INAM HUSSAIN", "Independent - INDOMEET SINGH": "Independent - INDOMEET SINGH", "Independent - IRFAN AHMAD SHAH": "Independent - IRFAN AHMAD SHAH", "Independent - IRSHAD AHMAD": "Independent - IRSHAD AHMAD", "Independent - ISHFAQ AHMAD SHEIKH": "Independent - ISHFAQ AHMAD SHEIKH", "Independent - JAHANGIR AHMAD SHEIKH": "Independent - JAHANGIR AHMAD SHEIKH", "Independent - JASVIR SINGH": "Independent - JASVIR SINGH", "Independent - JASWANT SINGH": "Independent - JASWANT SINGH", "Independent - JATINDER SINGH": "Independent - JATINDER SINGH", "Independent - JAVAID AHMAD RATHER": "Independent - JAVAID AHMAD RATHER", "Independent - JAVAID AHMAD WANI": "Independent - JAVAID AHMAD WANI", "Independent - JAVED HUSSAIN": "Independent - JAVED HUSSAIN", "Independent - JAVED MOHMAD HUBI": "Independent - JAVED MOHMAD HUBI", "Independent - JAVEED AHMAD CHOPAN": "Independent - JAVEED AHMAD CHOPAN", "Independent - JAVID AHMAD DAR": "Independent - JAVID AHMAD DAR", "Independent - JAVID AHMAD MIR": "Independent - JAVID AHMAD MIR", "Independent - JAWAZ AHMED": "Independent - JAWAZ AHMED", "Independent - JAYESH KUMAR": "Independent - JAYESH KUMAR", "Independent - JIBRAN DAR": "Independent - JIBRAN DAR", "Independent - JUGAL KISHORE": "Independent - JUGAL KISHORE", "Independent - JUNAID AZIM MATTU": "Independent - JUNAID AZIM MATTU", "Independent - JUNAID JAWAID MIR": "Independent - JUNAID JAWAID MIR", "Independent - KABIR AHMED": "Independent - KABIR AHMED", "Independent - KALIMULLAH LONE": "Independent - KALIMULLAH LONE", "Independent - KAYSAR AHMAD MIR": "Independent - KAYSAR AHMAD MIR", "Independent - KHURSHEED AHMAD SHIEKH": "Independent - KHURSHEED AHMAD SHIEKH", "Independent - KHURSHEEDA BAGAM": "Independent - KHURSHEEDA BAGAM", "Independent - KHUSHBOO BHAGAT": "Independent - KHUSHBOO BHAGAT", "Independent - KRISHAN CHAND": "Independent - KRISHAN CHAND", "Independent - KRISHAN DUTT": "Independent - KRISHAN DUTT", "Independent - KULBIR KUMAR": "Independent - KULBIR KUMAR", "Independent - KULDEEP KUMAR RAO": "Independent - KULDEEP KUMAR RAO", "Independent - KULWANT SINGH": "Independent - KULWANT SINGH", "Independent - KUSHAL SHARMA": "Independent - KUSHAL SHARMA", "Independent - MAAJID ASHRAF MIR": "Independent - MAAJID ASHRAF MIR", "Independent - MANOJ KUMAR": "Independent - MANOJ KUMAR", "Independent - MANSOOR HUSSAIN SOHARVARDI": "Independent - MANSOOR HUSSAIN SOHARVARDI", "Independent - MANZOOR AHMAD BHAT": "Independent - MANZOOR AHMAD BHAT", "Independent - MANZOOR AHMAD KALOO": "Independent - MANZOOR AHMAD KALOO", "Independent - MASOOD AHMED": "Independent - MASOOD AHMED", "Independent - MEENAKSHI KALRA": "Independent - MEENAKSHI KALRA", "Independent - MEHRAJ UD DIN GANAYEE": "Independent - MEHRAJ UD DIN GANAYEE", "Independent - MIAN MOHD MEHFOOZ": "Independent - MIAN MOHD MEHFOOZ", "Independent - MIR FANOON RAFIQ": "Independent - MIR FANOON RAFIQ", "Independent - MIRZA SAJAD HUSSAIN BEIGH": "Independent - MIRZA SAJAD HUSSAIN BEIGH", "Independent - MOHAMMAD AKBAR LONE": "Independent - MOHAMMAD AKBAR LONE", "Independent - MOHAMMAD FAHEEM RESHI": "Independent - MOHAMMAD FAHEEM RESHI", "Independent - MOHAMMAD ISMAIL BHAT": "Independent - MOHAMMAD ISMAIL BHAT", "Independent - MOHAMMAD LATIEF WANI": "Independent - MOHAMMAD LATIEF WANI", "Independent - MOHAMMAD MAQBOOL BEIGH": "Independent - MOHAMMAD MAQBOOL BEIGH", "Independent - MOHAMMAD MAQBOOL MAKNU": "Independent - MOHAMMAD MAQBOOL MAKNU", "Independent - MOHAMMAD MAQBOOL SHAH": "Independent - MOHAMMAD MAQBOOL SHAH", "Independent - MOHAMMAD MUZAFFAR SHEIKH": "Independent - MOHAMMAD MUZAFFAR SHEIKH", "Independent - MOHAMMAD OMAR HAFIZ": "Independent - MOHAMMAD OMAR HAFIZ", "Independent - MOHAMMAD SHAFI KHAN": "Independent - MOHAMMAD SHAFI KHAN", "Independent - MOHAMMAD SHAFI KHAN KASHI": "Independent - MOHAMMAD SHAFI KHAN KASHI", "Independent - MOHAMMAD SHARIEF SHAH": "Independent - MOHAMMAD SHARIEF SHAH", "Independent - MOHAMMAD SIKANDAR MALIK": "Independent - MOHAMMAD SIKANDAR MALIK", "Independent - MOHAMMAD SULTAN MAGRAY": "Independent - MOHAMMAD SULTAN MAGRAY", "Independent - MOHAMMAD YOUSUF MIR": "Independent - MOHAMMAD YOUSUF MIR", "Independent - MOHAN LAL KAITH": "Independent - MOHAN LAL KAITH", "Independent - MOHD AKBAR RATHER": "Independent - MOHD AKBAR RATHER", "Independent - MOHD AKRAM": "Independent - MOHD AKRAM", "Independent - MOHD ALTAF BHAT": "Independent - MOHD ALTAF BHAT", "Independent - MOHD ARIF": "Independent - MOHD ARIF", "Independent - MOHD ARIF DAR": "Independent - MOHD ARIF DAR", "Independent - MOHD ASHFAQ": "Independent - MOHD ASHFAQ", "Independent - MOHD ASIF": "Independent - MOHD ASIF", "Independent - MOHD ASIF BHAT": "Independent - MOHD ASIF BHAT", "Independent - MOHD ASIF GANAI": "Independent - MOHD ASIF GANAI", "Independent - MOHD AYOUB MIR": "Independent - MOHD AYOUB MIR", "Independent - MOHD IQBAL AHANGAR": "Independent - MOHD IQBAL AHANGAR", "Independent - MOHD IQBAL SOFI": "Independent - MOHD IQBAL SOFI", "Independent - MOHD MAJID": "Independent - MOHD MAJID", "Independent - MOHD MAQBOOL KHAN": "Independent - MOHD MAQBOOL KHAN", "Independent - MOHD SIDIQ SHAH": "Independent - MOHD SIDIQ SHAH", "Independent - MOHD SUHAIB BHAT": "Independent - MOHD SUHAIB BHAT", "Independent - MOHD YAQOOB MALLA": "Independent - MOHD YAQOOB MALLA", "Independent - MOHD YOUSUF GANAIE": "Independent - MOHD YOUSUF GANAIE", "Independent - MOHINDER SINGH": "Independent - MOHINDER SINGH", "Independent - MOHMAD SAYEED PEER": "Independent - MOHMAD SAYEED PEER", "Independent - MOHSIN IMTIYAZ": "Independent - MOHSIN IMTIYAZ", "Independent - MUDASIR AHMAD BHAT": "Independent - MUDASIR AHMAD BHAT", "Independent - MUDASIR AHMAD SHAH": "Independent - MUDASIR AHMAD SHAH", "Independent - MUDASSIR MANZOOR": "Independent - MUDASSIR MANZOOR", "Independent - MUDDASIR RASHID BAZAZ": "Independent - MUDDASIR RASHID BAZAZ", "Independent - MUHAMMAD IRFAN SHAH": "Independent - MUHAMMAD IRFAN SHAH", "Independent - MUKHTAR AHMAD DAR": "Independent - MUKHTAR AHMAD DAR", "Independent - MUNAZAR AHMED MALIK": "Independent - MUNAZAR AHMED MALIK", "Independent - MUNIR AHMAD": "Independent - MUNIR AHMAD", "Independent - MURSALEEN AAJIR": "Independent - MURSALEEN AAJIR", "Independent - MUSAIB HASSAN LONE": "Independent - MUSAIB HASSAN LONE", "Independent - MUSHTAQ AHMAD CHANGA": "Independent - MUSHTAQ AHMAD CHANGA", "Independent - MUZAFAR AHMAD DAR": "Independent - MUZAFAR AHMAD DAR", "Independent - MUZAFAR HUSSAIN BAIG": "Independent - MUZAFAR HUSSAIN BAIG", "Independent - MUZAFFAR HUSSAIN DAR": "Independent - MUZAFFAR HUSSAIN DAR", "Independent - MUZAFFAR IQBAL KHAN": "Independent - MUZAFFAR IQBAL KHAN", "Independent - NARINDER SINGH": "Independent - NARINDER SINGH", "Independent - NASEER AHMAD RATHER": "Independent - NASEER AHMAD RATHER", "Independent - NAZIR AHMAD": "Independent - NAZIR AHMAD", "Independent - NAZIR AHMAD BHAT": "Independent - NAZIR AHMAD BHAT", "Independent - NAZIR AHMAD GILKAR": "Independent - NAZIR AHMAD GILKAR", "Independent - NAZIR AHMAD KHAN": "Independent - NAZIR AHMAD KHAN", "Independent - NAZIR AHMAD MIR": "Independent - NAZIR AHMAD MIR", "Independent - NAZIR AHMAD SOFI": "Independent - NAZIR AHMAD SOFI", "Independent - NAZIR AHMAD WANI": "Independent - NAZIR AHMAD WANI", "Independent - NAZIR HUSSAIN": "Independent - NAZIR HUSSAIN", "Independent - NIGHAT PARVEEN": "Independent - NIGHAT PARVEEN", "Independent - NILOFAR SAJJAD GANDRU": "Independent - NILOFAR SAJJAD GANDRU", "Independent - NISAR AHMAD MIR": "Independent - NISAR AHMAD MIR", "Independent - NISAR AHMAD WANI": "Independent - NISAR AHMAD WANI", "Independent - NIZAMUDDIN BHAT": "Independent - NIZAMUDDIN BHAT", "Independent - NOOR MOHAMMAD SHEIKH": "Independent - NOOR MOHAMMAD SHEIKH", "Independent - OM PRAKASH GUPTA": "Independent - OM PRAKASH GUPTA", "Independent - OMAR MAJEED WANI": "Independent - OMAR MAJEED WANI", "Independent - PANKAJ KUMAR RAINA": "Independent - PANKAJ KUMAR RAINA", "Independent - PARAMVEER SINGH": "Independent - PARAMVEER SINGH", "Independent - PARVEEN KUMAR": "Independent - PARVEEN KUMAR", "Independent - PARVEZ JAMAL": "Independent - PARVEZ JAMAL", "Independent - PAWAN KHAJURIA": "Independent - PAWAN KHAJURIA", "Independent - PAYARE LAL SHARMA": "Independent - PAYARE LAL SHARMA", "Independent - PINTY DEVI": "Independent - PINTY DEVI", "Independent - PIRZADA FIRDOUS AHMAD": "Independent - PIRZADA FIRDOUS AHMAD", "Independent - PREM PAL": "Independent - PREM PAL", "Independent - PRINCE PARVEZ": "Independent - PRINCE PARVEZ", "Independent - PRIYANKA SHARMA": "Independent - PRIYANKA SHARMA", "Independent - PUSHVINDER SINGH": "Independent - PUSHVINDER SINGH", "Independent - QAZI MOHD IRSHAD": "Independent - QAZI MOHD IRSHAD", "Independent - RAJ KUMAR": "Independent - RAJ KUMAR", "Independent - RAJ KUMAR LALOTRA": "Independent - RAJ KUMAR LALOTRA", "Independent - RAJ SINGH": "Independent - RAJ SINGH", "Independent - RAJA ABDUL WAHEED": "Independent - RAJA ABDUL WAHEED", "Independent - RAKESH GOSWAMI": "Independent - RAKESH GOSWAMI", "Independent - RAQIA AKHTER": "Independent - RAQIA AKHTER", "Independent - RAVI DUTT": "Independent - RAVI DUTT", "Independent - RAVI KUMAR": "Independent - RAVI KUMAR", "Independent - RAVINDER SINGH": "Independent - RAVINDER SINGH", "Independent - RAWOOF AHMAD PADDER": "Independent - RAWOOF AHMAD PADDER", "Independent - REENA CHOUDHARY": "Independent - REENA CHOUDHARY", "Independent - REYAZ MAJID SOFI": "Independent - REYAZ MAJID SOFI", "Independent - RISHI KAUL": "Independent - RISHI KAUL", "Independent - RIYAZ AHMAD BHAT": "Independent - RIYAZ AHMAD BHAT", "Independent - RIYAZ AHMAD GORSI": "Independent - RIYAZ AHMAD GORSI", "Independent - RIYAZ AHMAD SOFI": "Independent - RIYAZ AHMAD SOFI", "Independent - RIZWAN ILLAHI PARVAIZ": "Independent - RIZWAN ILLAHI PARVAIZ", "Independent - ROOP LAL": "Independent - ROOP LAL", "Independent - ROUF AHMAD BHAT": "Independent - ROUF AHMAD BHAT", "Independent - SAFINA BAIG": "Independent - SAFINA BAIG", "Independent - SAHEER AHMAD RATHER": "Independent - SAHEER AHMAD RATHER", "Independent - SAHIL SHARMA": "Independent - SAHIL SHARMA", "Independent - SAJAD AHMAD DAR": "Independent - SAJAD AHMAD DAR", "Independent - SAJAD SUBHAN RATHER": "Independent - SAJAD SUBHAN RATHER", "Independent - SALMAN RABBANI": "Independent - SALMAN RABBANI", "Independent - SANDEEP SINGH SAMBYAL": "Independent - SANDEEP SINGH SAMBYAL", "Independent - SANJAY PARVA": "Independent - SANJAY PARVA", "Independent - SANJEEV KUMAR": "Independent - SANJEEV KUMAR", "Independent - SAQUIB RAHMAN MAKHDOOMI": "Independent - SAQUIB RAHMAN MAKHDOOMI", "Independent - SARFRAZ SAFDER": "Independent - SARFRAZ SAFDER", "Independent - SARJAN AHMAD WAGAY": "Independent - SARJAN AHMAD WAGAY", "Independent - SATISH SHARMA": "Independent - SATISH SHARMA", "Independent - SAYAR AHMAD RESHI": "Independent - SAYAR AHMAD RESHI", "Independent - SAYED NISAR GEELANI": "Independent - SAYED NISAR GEELANI", "Independent - SHABIR AHMAD GANIE": "Independent - SHABIR AHMAD GANIE", "Independent - SHABIR AHMAD KULLAY": "Independent - SHABIR AHMAD KULLAY", "Independent - SHABIR AHMAD MALIK": "Independent - SHABIR AHMAD MALIK", "Independent - SHABIR AHMAD MIR": "Independent - SHABIR AHMAD MIR", "Independent - SHABIR AHMAD NAJAR": "Independent - SHABIR AHMAD NAJAR", "Independent - SHABIR AHMAD SHAH": "Independent - SHABIR AHMAD SHAH", "Independent - SHAFEEQA BEGUM": "Independent - SHAFEEQA BEGUM", "Independent - SHAH MOHD": "Independent - SHAH MOHD", "Independent - SHAHID HUSSAIN MIR": "Independent - SHAHID HUSSAIN MIR", "Independent - SHAIR ZAMAN DEEDAD": "Independent - SHAIR ZAMAN DEEDAD", "Independent - SHAKEEL AHMAD DAR": "Independent - SHAKEEL AHMAD DAR", "Independent - SHAM LAL": "Independent - SHAM LAL", "Independent - SHAM SINGH": "Independent - SHAM SINGH", "Independent - SHASHI KANT KHAJURIA": "Independent - SHASHI KANT KHAJURIA", "Independent - SHAZAD AHMED MALIK": "Independent - SHAZAD AHMED MALIK", "Independent - SHEEBAN ASHAI": "Independent - SHEEBAN ASHAI", "Independent - SHEIKH IMRAN": "Independent - SHEIKH IMRAN", "Independent - SHEIKH MASOODI JOHN": "Independent - SHEIKH MASOODI JOHN", "Independent - SHEIKH SARWAR HUSSAIN": "Independent - SHEIKH SARWAR HUSSAIN", "Independent - SHEIKH ZAFARRULAH": "Independent - SHEIKH ZAFARRULAH", "Independent - SHIV DEV SHARMA": "Independent - SHIV DEV SHARMA", "Independent - SHIV DEV SINGH": "Independent - SHIV DEV SINGH", "Independent - SHOAIB NABI LONE": "Independent - SHOAIB NABI LONE", "Independent - SHOWKAT AHMAD BHAT": "Independent - SHOWKAT AHMAD BHAT", "Independent - SHOWKET AHMAD BHAT": "Independent - SHOWKET AHMAD BHAT", "Independent - SHRI KANT": "Independent - SHRI KANT", "Independent - SHUIAB MOHD SHIEKH": "Independent - SHUIAB MOHD SHIEKH", "Independent - SOFI MOHAMMAD AKBAR": "Independent - SOFI MOHAMMAD AKBAR", "Independent - SOMA": "Independent - SOMA", "Independent - SUBASH CHANDER": "Independent - SUBASH CHANDER", "Independent - SUHAIL AHMAD MIR": "Independent - SUHAIL AHMAD MIR", "Independent - SUHIL AHMAD BHAT": "Independent - SUHIL AHMAD BHAT", "Independent - SULAKSH GUPTA": "Independent - SULAKSH GUPTA", "Independent - SULAKSHNA KHAJURIA": "Independent - SULAKSHNA KHAJURIA", "Independent - SUNIL SINGH": "Independent - SUNIL SINGH", "Independent - SUNNY KANT CHIB": "Independent - SUNNY KANT CHIB", "Independent - SURAJ SINGH PARIHAR": "Independent - SURAJ SINGH PARIHAR", "Independent - SURESH KUMAR": "Independent - SURESH KUMAR", "Independent - SURINDER KUMAR": "Independent - SURINDER KUMAR", "Independent - SURINDER SINGH": "Independent - SURINDER SINGH", "Independent - SURJEET SINGH": "Independent - SURJEET SINGH", "Independent - SUTEESH KUMAR": "Independent - SUTEESH KUMAR", "Independent - SWARN KUMAR": "Independent - SWARN KUMAR", "Independent - SWARN LAL": "Independent - SWARN LAL", "Independent - SWARN VEER SINGH JARAL": "Independent - SWARN VEER SINGH JARAL", "Independent - SYED AMEER SUHAIL": "Independent - SYED AMEER SUHAIL", "Independent - SYED BASHARAT HUSSAIN": "Independent - SYED BASHARAT HUSSAIN", "Independent - SYED FIDA HUSSAIN MOOSVI": "Independent - SYED FIDA HUSSAIN MOOSVI", "Independent - SYED MOHAMMAD": "Independent - SYED MOHAMMAD", "Independent - SYEED ABRAR AHMAD SHAH": "Independent - SYEED ABRAR AHMAD SHAH", "Independent - TAHIR MANSOOR ZARGAR": "Independent - TAHIR MANSOOR ZARGAR", "Independent - TAJ MOHI UD DIN": "Independent - TAJ MOHI UD DIN", "Independent - TAJAMUL HAMID": "Independent - TAJAMUL HAMID", "Independent - TALAT MAJID ALIE": "Independent - TALAT MAJID ALIE", "Independent - TANVEER FATIMA": "Independent - TANVEER FATIMA", "Independent - TARIQ HUSSAIN": "Independent - TARIQ HUSSAIN", "Independent - TAWSEEF NISAR": "Independent - TAWSEEF NISAR", "Independent - TEJINDER SINGH": "Independent - TEJINDER SINGH", "Independent - TOUSEEF MEHRAJ RAINA": "Independent - TOUSEEF MEHRAJ RAINA", "Independent - UDESH PAUL SHARMA": "Independent - UDESH PAUL SHARMA", "Independent - UMAR FAROOQ PARRY": "Independent - UMAR FAROOQ PARRY", "Independent - UMAR HAMID MALLA": "Independent - UMAR HAMID MALLA", "Independent - USHA DEVI": "Independent - USHA DEVI", "Independent - USMAN ABDUL MAJID": "Independent - USMAN ABDUL MAJID", "Independent - VINOD KUMAR": "Independent - VINOD KUMAR", "Independent - VISHAL KUMAR": "Independent - VISHAL KUMAR", "Independent - WARIS ABDULLAH DAR": "Independent - WARIS ABDULLAH DAR", "Independent - WASEEM AHMED SHALLA": "Independent - WASEEM AHMED SHALLA", "Independent - WASEEM HAYAT": "Independent - WASEEM HAYAT", "Independent - WAZIR AHMAD QURESHI": "Independent - WAZIR AHMAD QURESHI", "Independent - YASIR RESHI": "Independent - YASIR RESHI", "Independent - YOUNIS QAWAM": "Independent - YOUNIS QAWAM", "Independent - ZAHID IQBAL": "Independent - ZAHID IQBAL", "Independent - ZAHID MUSHTAQ SHEIKH": "Independent - ZAHID MUSHTAQ SHEIKH", "Independent - ZAMAN IRSHAD PARRY": "Independent - ZAMAN IRSHAD PARRY", "Indian National Congress": "Indian National Congress", "J&K National Panthers Party (India)": "J&K National Panthers Party (India)", "Jammu & Kashmir All Alliance Democratic Party": "Jammu & Kashmir All Alliance Democratic Party", "Jammu & Kashmir Awami National Conference": "Jammu & Kashmir Awami National Conference", "Jammu & Kashmir National Conference": "Jammu & Kashmir National Conference", "Jammu & Kashmir National Panthers Party (Bhim)": "Jammu & Kashmir National Panthers Party (Bhim)", "Jammu & Kashmir People Conference": "Jammu & Kashmir People Conference", "Jammu & Kashmir Peoples Democratic Party": "Jammu & Kashmir Peoples Democratic Party", "Jammu And Kashmir Peoples Democratic Front (Secular)": "Jammu And Kashmir Peoples Democratic Front (Secular)", "Jammu and Kashmir Apni Party": "Jammu and Kashmir Apni Party", "Jammu and Kashmir Nationalist People's Front": "Jammu and Kashmir Nationalist People's Front", "Janata Dal  (United)": "Janata Dal  (United)", "Liberal Democratic Party": "Liberal Democratic Party", "National Awami United Party": "National Awami United Party", "National Democratic Party (Indian)": "National Democratic Party (Indian)", "National Loktantrik Party": "National Loktantrik Party", "National Republic Party Of India": "National Republic Party Of India", "National Youth Party": "National Youth Party", "Nationalist Congress Party": "Nationalist Congress Party", "None of the Above - NOTA": "None of the Above - NOTA", "Peoples Democratic Party": "Peoples Democratic Party", "Rashtriya Lok Dal": "Rashtriya Lok Dal", "Rashtriya Lok Janshakti Party": "Rashtriya Lok Janshakti Party", "Republican Party of India (A)": "Republican Party of India (A)", "Republican Party of India (Athawale)": "Republican Party of India (Athawale)", "Sainik Samaj Party": "Sainik Samaj Party", "Samajwadi Party": "Samajwadi Party", "Sampoorna Bharat Kranti Party": "Sampoorna Bharat Kranti Party", "Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray)": "Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray)", "ShivSena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray)": "ShivSena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 90, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 90, "registered_not_positive": 90}, "n_stations_flagged": 90, "created_at": "2026-07-07T00:58:28.783516", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.381, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.281, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.281, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 90}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "62cc11db23a94d1a87bf584a65d908b2", "name": "India 2023 local (overnight india_chhattisgarh_2023_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"party_AAP": "party_AAP", "party_AJP": "party_AJP", "party_APOI": "party_APOI", "party_BJP": "party_BJP", "party_BLRP": "party_BLRP", "party_BMUP": "party_BMUP", "party_BSCP": "party_BSCP", "party_BSHSP": "party_BSHSP", "party_BSP": "party_BSP", "party_CMP": "party_CMP", "party_CPI": "party_CPI", "party_GGP": "party_GGP", "party_GSP_ABBR_2": "party_GSP_ABBR_2", "party_HMR": "party_HMR", "party_INC": "party_INC", "party_IND": "party_IND", "party_JAC": "party_JAC", "party_JCC(J)": "party_JCC(J)", "party_JCGP": "party_JCGP", "party_NYP": "party_NYP", "party_OTH": "party_OTH", "party_PPID": "party_PPID", "party_RGOP": "party_RGOP", "party_RJP": "party_RJP", "party_RTORP": "party_RTORP", "party_SP": "party_SP", "party_SRVADID": "party_SRVADID", "party_SSBD": "party_SSBD", "party_chp": "party_chp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 90, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-07T00:58:26.244000", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.374, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.273, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.283, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.205, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.422, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 90}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8dcd0d9c84eb48b786f819e68001e74e", "name": "India 2024 local (overnight india_jharkhand_2024_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AJSU Party": "AJSU Party", "Aadarsh Sangram Party": "Aadarsh Sangram Party", "Aapki Vikas Party": "Aapki Vikas Party", "Aazad Samaj Party (Kanshi Ram)": "Aazad Samaj Party (Kanshi Ram)", "Abua Jharkhand Party": "Abua Jharkhand Party", "Akhil Bharatiya Socialist Party": "Akhil Bharatiya Socialist Party", "Akhil Bhartiya Aarakshit Samaj Party": "Akhil Bhartiya Aarakshit Samaj Party", "Akhil Bhartiya Jharkhand Party": "Akhil Bhartiya Jharkhand Party", "All India Forward Bloc": "All India Forward Bloc", "All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen": "All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen", "Ambedkar National Congress": "Ambedkar National Congress", "Ambedkarite Party of India": "Ambedkarite Party of India", "Azad Adhikar Sena": "Azad Adhikar Sena", "Bahujan Samaj Party": "Bahujan Samaj Party", "Bhagidari Party(P)": "Bhagidari Party(P)", "Bharat Adivasi Party": "Bharat Adivasi Party", "Bharatiya Jan Jagriti Party": "Bharatiya Jan Jagriti Party", "Bharatiya Janata Party": "Bharatiya Janata Party", "Bharatiya Rashtriya Forward Bloc": "Bharatiya Rashtriya Forward Bloc", "Bharatiya Sarvjan Vikas Party": "Bharatiya Sarvjan Vikas Party", "Bhartiya Azad Sena": "Bhartiya Azad Sena", "Bhartiya Janjagran Gandhiwadi Party": "Bhartiya Janjagran Gandhiwadi Party", "Bhartiya Rashtriya Jagsewa Party": "Bhartiya Rashtriya Jagsewa Party", "Communist Party of India": "Communist Party of India", "Communist Party of India (Marxist)": "Communist Party of India (Marxist)", "Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) (Liberation)": "Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) (Liberation)", "Gondvana Gantantra Party": "Gondvana Gantantra Party", "Hamar Raj Party": "Hamar Raj Party", "Hindustan Peoples Party (Democratic)": "Hindustan Peoples Party (Democratic)", "Hindustani Awam Manch (United),": "Hindustani Awam Manch (United),", "Independent_10_10": "Independent_10_10", "Independent_10_11": "Independent_10_11", "Independent_10_12": "Independent_10_12", "Independent_10_13": "Independent_10_13", "Independent_10_7": "Independent_10_7", "Independent_10_8": "Independent_10_8", "Independent_10_9": "Independent_10_9", "Independent_11_11": "Independent_11_11", "Independent_11_12": "Independent_11_12", "Independent_11_13": "Independent_11_13", "Independent_11_14": "Independent_11_14", "Independent_11_15": "Independent_11_15", "Independent_11_16": "Independent_11_16", "Independent_11_17": "Independent_11_17", "Independent_11_18": "Independent_11_18", "Independent_12_10": "Independent_12_10", "Independent_12_11": "Independent_12_11", "Independent_12_12": "Independent_12_12", "Independent_12_13": "Independent_12_13", "Independent_12_14": "Independent_12_14", "Independent_12_15": "Independent_12_15", "Independent_12_16": "Independent_12_16", "Independent_12_17": "Independent_12_17", "Independent_12_8": "Independent_12_8", "Independent_12_9": "Independent_12_9", "Independent_13_10": "Independent_13_10", "Independent_13_11": "Independent_13_11", "Independent_13_12": "Independent_13_12", "Independent_13_13": "Independent_13_13", "Independent_13_14": "Independent_13_14", "Independent_13_15": "Independent_13_15", "Independent_13_7": "Independent_13_7", "Independent_13_8": "Independent_13_8", "Independent_13_9": "Independent_13_9", "Independent_14_10": "Independent_14_10", "Independent_14_11": "Independent_14_11", "Independent_14_12": "Independent_14_12", "Independent_14_13": "Independent_14_13", "Independent_14_14": "Independent_14_14", "Independent_14_15": "Independent_14_15", "Independent_14_16": "Independent_14_16", "Independent_14_17": "Independent_14_17", "Independent_14_9": "Independent_14_9", "Independent_15_5": "Independent_15_5", "Independent_15_6": "Independent_15_6", "Independent_15_7": "Independent_15_7", "Independent_16_10": "Independent_16_10", "Independent_16_11": "Independent_16_11", "Independent_16_12": "Independent_16_12", "Independent_16_13": "Independent_16_13", "Independent_16_8": "Independent_16_8", "Independent_16_9": "Independent_16_9", "Independent_17_10": "Independent_17_10", "Independent_17_11": "Independent_17_11", "Independent_17_12": "Independent_17_12", "Independent_17_13": "Independent_17_13", "Independent_17_14": "Independent_17_14", "Independent_17_15": "Independent_17_15", "Independent_18_10": "Independent_18_10", "Independent_18_6": "Independent_18_6", "Independent_18_7": "Independent_18_7", "Independent_18_8": "Independent_18_8", "Independent_18_9": "Independent_18_9", "Independent_19_10": "Independent_19_10", "Independent_19_11": "Independent_19_11", "Independent_19_12": "Independent_19_12", "Independent_19_13": "Independent_19_13", "Independent_19_5": "Independent_19_5", "Independent_19_6": "Independent_19_6", "Independent_19_7": "Independent_19_7", "Independent_19_8": "Independent_19_8", "Independent_19_9": "Independent_19_9", "Independent_1_10": "Independent_1_10", "Independent_1_11": "Independent_1_11", "Independent_1_12": "Independent_1_12", "Independent_1_13": "Independent_1_13", "Independent_1_14": "Independent_1_14", "Independent_1_7": "Independent_1_7", "Independent_1_8": "Independent_1_8", "Independent_1_9": "Independent_1_9", "Independent_20_10": "Independent_20_10", "Independent_20_11": "Independent_20_11", "Independent_20_12": "Independent_20_12", "Independent_20_13": "Independent_20_13", "Independent_20_14": "Independent_20_14", "Independent_20_15": "Independent_20_15", "Independent_20_16": "Independent_20_16", "Independent_20_17": "Independent_20_17", "Independent_20_18": "Independent_20_18", "Independent_20_19": "Independent_20_19", "Independent_20_20": "Independent_20_20", "Independent_21_10": "Independent_21_10", "Independent_21_11": "Independent_21_11", "Independent_21_12": "Independent_21_12", "Independent_21_13": "Independent_21_13", "Independent_21_14": "Independent_21_14", "Independent_21_15": "Independent_21_15", "Independent_21_16": "Independent_21_16", "Independent_21_17": "Independent_21_17", "Independent_21_8": "Independent_21_8", "Independent_21_9": "Independent_21_9", "Independent_22_16": "Independent_22_16", "Independent_22_17": "Independent_22_17", "Independent_22_18": "Independent_22_18", "Independent_22_19": "Independent_22_19", "Independent_22_20": "Independent_22_20", "Independent_22_21": "Independent_22_21", "Independent_22_22": "Independent_22_22", "Independent_22_23": "Independent_22_23", "Independent_22_24": "Independent_22_24", "Independent_22_25": "Independent_22_25", "Independent_22_26": "Independent_22_26", "Independent_23_11": "Independent_23_11", "Independent_23_12": "Independent_23_12", "Independent_23_13": "Independent_23_13", "Independent_23_14": "Independent_23_14", "Independent_23_15": "Independent_23_15", "Independent_23_16": "Independent_23_16", "Independent_23_17": "Independent_23_17", "Independent_24_11": "Independent_24_11", "Independent_24_12": "Independent_24_12", "Independent_24_13": "Independent_24_13", "Independent_24_14": "Independent_24_14", "Independent_24_15": "Independent_24_15", "Independent_24_16": "Independent_24_16", "Independent_24_17": "Independent_24_17", "Independent_24_18": "Independent_24_18", "Independent_25_13": "Independent_25_13", "Independent_25_14": "Independent_25_14", "Independent_25_15": "Independent_25_15", "Independent_25_16": "Independent_25_16", "Independent_25_17": "Independent_25_17", "Independent_25_18": "Independent_25_18", "Independent_25_19": "Independent_25_19", "Independent_25_20": "Independent_25_20", "Independent_25_21": "Independent_25_21", "Independent_25_22": "Independent_25_22", "Independent_25_23": "Independent_25_23", "Independent_26_10": "Independent_26_10", "Independent_26_11": "Independent_26_11", "Independent_26_7": "Independent_26_7", "Independent_26_8": "Independent_26_8", "Independent_26_9": "Independent_26_9", "Independent_27_10": "Independent_27_10", "Independent_27_11": "Independent_27_11", "Independent_27_9": "Independent_27_9", "Independent_28_10": "Independent_28_10", "Independent_28_11": "Independent_28_11", "Independent_28_12": "Independent_28_12", "Independent_28_13": "Independent_28_13", "Independent_28_14": "Independent_28_14", "Independent_28_15": "Independent_28_15", "Independent_28_16": "Independent_28_16", "Independent_28_17": "Independent_28_17", "Independent_28_18": "Independent_28_18", "Independent_28_19": "Independent_28_19", "Independent_28_20": "Independent_28_20", "Independent_28_21": "Independent_28_21", "Independent_28_22": "Independent_28_22", "Independent_28_23": "Independent_28_23", "Independent_28_24": "Independent_28_24", "Independent_28_9": "Independent_28_9", "Independent_29_10": "Independent_29_10", "Independent_29_11": "Independent_29_11", "Independent_29_12": "Independent_29_12", "Independent_29_13": "Independent_29_13", "Independent_29_9": "Independent_29_9", "Independent_2_10": "Independent_2_10", "Independent_2_11": "Independent_2_11", "Independent_2_12": "Independent_2_12", "Independent_2_13": "Independent_2_13", "Independent_2_14": "Independent_2_14", "Independent_2_15": "Independent_2_15", "Independent_2_8": "Independent_2_8", "Independent_2_9": "Independent_2_9", "Independent_30_6": "Independent_30_6", "Independent_30_7": "Independent_30_7", "Independent_30_8": "Independent_30_8", "Independent_31_10": "Independent_31_10", "Independent_31_11": "Independent_31_11", "Independent_31_12": "Independent_31_12", "Independent_31_13": "Independent_31_13", "Independent_31_14": "Independent_31_14", "Independent_31_15": "Independent_31_15", "Independent_32_10": "Independent_32_10", "Independent_32_11": "Independent_32_11", "Independent_32_12": "Independent_32_12", "Independent_32_13": "Independent_32_13", "Independent_32_14": "Independent_32_14", "Independent_32_9": "Independent_32_9", "Independent_33_10": "Independent_33_10", "Independent_33_11": "Independent_33_11", "Independent_33_12": "Independent_33_12", "Independent_33_9": "Independent_33_9", "Independent_34_10": "Independent_34_10", "Independent_34_11": "Independent_34_11", "Independent_34_12": "Independent_34_12", "Independent_34_6": "Independent_34_6", "Independent_34_7": "Independent_34_7", "Independent_34_8": "Independent_34_8", "Independent_34_9": "Independent_34_9", "Independent_35_10": "Independent_35_10", "Independent_35_11": "Independent_35_11", "Independent_35_12": "Independent_35_12", "Independent_35_13": "Independent_35_13", "Independent_35_14": "Independent_35_14", "Independent_35_7": "Independent_35_7", "Independent_35_8": "Independent_35_8", "Independent_35_9": "Independent_35_9", "Independent_36_11": "Independent_36_11", "Independent_36_12": "Independent_36_12", "Independent_36_13": "Independent_36_13", "Independent_36_14": "Independent_36_14", "Independent_37_6": "Independent_37_6", "Independent_37_7": "Independent_37_7", "Independent_37_8": "Independent_37_8", "Independent_38_9": "Independent_38_9", "Independent_39_7": "Independent_39_7", "Independent_39_8": "Independent_39_8", "Independent_39_9": "Independent_39_9", "Independent_3_5": "Independent_3_5", "Independent_3_6": "Independent_3_6", "Independent_3_7": "Independent_3_7", "Independent_3_8": "Independent_3_8", "Independent_3_9": "Independent_3_9", "Independent_40_10": "Independent_40_10", "Independent_40_11": "Independent_40_11", "Independent_40_12": "Independent_40_12", "Independent_40_13": "Independent_40_13", "Independent_40_14": "Independent_40_14", "Independent_40_15": "Independent_40_15", "Independent_40_16": "Independent_40_16", "Independent_40_17": "Independent_40_17", "Independent_40_18": "Independent_40_18", "Independent_40_9": "Independent_40_9", "Independent_41_10": "Independent_41_10", "Independent_41_11": "Independent_41_11", "Independent_41_6": "Independent_41_6", "Independent_41_7": "Independent_41_7", "Independent_41_8": "Independent_41_8", "Independent_41_9": "Independent_41_9", "Independent_42_11": "Independent_42_11", "Independent_42_12": "Independent_42_12", "Independent_42_13": "Independent_42_13", "Independent_42_14": "Independent_42_14", "Independent_42_15": "Independent_42_15", "Independent_42_16": "Independent_42_16", "Independent_42_17": "Independent_42_17", "Independent_42_18": "Independent_42_18", "Independent_42_19": "Independent_42_19", "Independent_42_20": "Independent_42_20", "Independent_43_10": "Independent_43_10", "Independent_43_11": "Independent_43_11", "Independent_43_12": "Independent_43_12", "Independent_43_13": "Independent_43_13", "Independent_43_8": "Independent_43_8", "Independent_43_9": "Independent_43_9", "Independent_44_10": "Independent_44_10", "Independent_44_11": "Independent_44_11", "Independent_44_12": "Independent_44_12", "Independent_44_13": "Independent_44_13", "Independent_44_14": "Independent_44_14", "Independent_44_9": "Independent_44_9", "Independent_45_10": "Independent_45_10", "Independent_45_11": "Independent_45_11", "Independent_45_12": "Independent_45_12", "Independent_45_9": "Independent_45_9", "Independent_46_10": "Independent_46_10", "Independent_46_11": "Independent_46_11", "Independent_46_12": "Independent_46_12", "Independent_46_13": "Independent_46_13", "Independent_46_14": "Independent_46_14", "Independent_46_15": "Independent_46_15", "Independent_46_16": "Independent_46_16", "Independent_46_9": "Independent_46_9", "Independent_47_10": "Independent_47_10", "Independent_47_11": "Independent_47_11", "Independent_47_12": "Independent_47_12", "Independent_47_7": "Independent_47_7", "Independent_47_8": "Independent_47_8", "Independent_47_9": "Independent_47_9", "Independent_48_10": "Independent_48_10", "Independent_48_11": "Independent_48_11", "Independent_48_12": "Independent_48_12", "Independent_48_13": "Independent_48_13", "Independent_48_14": "Independent_48_14", "Independent_48_15": "Independent_48_15", "Independent_48_16": "Independent_48_16", "Independent_48_17": "Independent_48_17", "Independent_48_18": "Independent_48_18", "Independent_48_19": "Independent_48_19", "Independent_48_20": "Independent_48_20", "Independent_48_21": "Independent_48_21", "Independent_48_22": "Independent_48_22", "Independent_48_23": "Independent_48_23", "Independent_48_24": "Independent_48_24", "Independent_49_14": "Independent_49_14", "Independent_49_15": "Independent_49_15", "Independent_49_16": "Independent_49_16", "Independent_49_17": "Independent_49_17", "Independent_49_18": "Independent_49_18", "Independent_49_19": "Independent_49_19", "Independent_49_20": "Independent_49_20", "Independent_49_21": "Independent_49_21", "Independent_49_22": "Independent_49_22", "Independent_49_23": "Independent_49_23", "Independent_49_24": "Independent_49_24", "Independent_49_25": "Independent_49_25", "Independent_49_26": "Independent_49_26", "Independent_49_27": "Independent_49_27", "Independent_49_28": "Independent_49_28", "Independent_4_6": "Independent_4_6", "Independent_4_7": "Independent_4_7", "Independent_4_8": "Independent_4_8", "Independent_4_9": "Independent_4_9", "Independent_50_12": "Independent_50_12", "Independent_50_13": "Independent_50_13", "Independent_50_14": "Independent_50_14", "Independent_50_15": "Independent_50_15", "Independent_50_16": "Independent_50_16", "Independent_50_17": "Independent_50_17", "Independent_50_18": "Independent_50_18", "Independent_50_19": "Independent_50_19", "Independent_50_20": "Independent_50_20", "Independent_50_21": "Independent_50_21", "Independent_50_22": "Independent_50_22", "Independent_50_23": "Independent_50_23", "Independent_51_10": "Independent_51_10", "Independent_51_11": "Independent_51_11", "Independent_51_12": "Independent_51_12", "Independent_51_13": "Independent_51_13", "Independent_51_9": "Independent_51_9", "Independent_52_11": "Independent_52_11", "Independent_52_12": "Independent_52_12", "Independent_52_13": "Independent_52_13", "Independent_52_14": "Independent_52_14", "Independent_53_10": "Independent_53_10", "Independent_53_11": "Independent_53_11", "Independent_53_12": "Independent_53_12", "Independent_53_6": "Independent_53_6", "Independent_53_7": "Independent_53_7", "Independent_53_8": "Independent_53_8", "Independent_53_9": "Independent_53_9", "Independent_54_5": "Independent_54_5", "Independent_54_6": "Independent_54_6", "Independent_54_7": "Independent_54_7", "Independent_54_8": "Independent_54_8", "Independent_55_10": "Independent_55_10", "Independent_55_11": "Independent_55_11", "Independent_55_12": "Independent_55_12", "Independent_55_8": "Independent_55_8", "Independent_55_9": "Independent_55_9", "Independent_56_10": "Independent_56_10", "Independent_56_11": "Independent_56_11", "Independent_56_12": "Independent_56_12", "Independent_56_6": "Independent_56_6", "Independent_56_7": "Independent_56_7", "Independent_56_8": "Independent_56_8", "Independent_56_9": "Independent_56_9", "Independent_57_10": "Independent_57_10", "Independent_57_5": "Independent_57_5", "Independent_57_6": "Independent_57_6", "Independent_57_7": "Independent_57_7", "Independent_57_8": "Independent_57_8", "Independent_57_9": "Independent_57_9", "Independent_58_10": "Independent_58_10", "Independent_58_11": "Independent_58_11", "Independent_58_12": "Independent_58_12", "Independent_58_13": "Independent_58_13", "Independent_58_14": "Independent_58_14", "Independent_58_15": "Independent_58_15", "Independent_58_16": "Independent_58_16", "Independent_58_17": "Independent_58_17", "Independent_58_18": "Independent_58_18", "Independent_58_9": "Independent_58_9", "Independent_59_10": "Independent_59_10", "Independent_59_11": "Independent_59_11", "Independent_59_12": "Independent_59_12", "Independent_59_8": "Independent_59_8", "Independent_59_9": "Independent_59_9", "Independent_5_12": "Independent_5_12", "Independent_5_13": "Independent_5_13", "Independent_5_14": "Independent_5_14", "Independent_5_15": "Independent_5_15", "Independent_5_16": "Independent_5_16", "Independent_60_10": "Independent_60_10", "Independent_60_11": "Independent_60_11", "Independent_60_8": "Independent_60_8", "Independent_60_9": "Independent_60_9", "Independent_61_10": "Independent_61_10", "Independent_61_11": "Independent_61_11", "Independent_61_12": "Independent_61_12", "Independent_61_13": "Independent_61_13", "Independent_61_14": "Independent_61_14", "Independent_61_15": "Independent_61_15", "Independent_61_9": "Independent_61_9", "Independent_62_10": "Independent_62_10", "Independent_62_11": "Independent_62_11", "Independent_62_12": "Independent_62_12", "Independent_62_13": "Independent_62_13", "Independent_62_14": "Independent_62_14", "Independent_62_15": "Independent_62_15", "Independent_62_16": "Independent_62_16", "Independent_62_17": "Independent_62_17", "Independent_62_18": "Independent_62_18", "Independent_62_19": "Independent_62_19", "Independent_62_20": "Independent_62_20", "Independent_63_10": "Independent_63_10", "Independent_63_11": "Independent_63_11", "Independent_63_12": "Independent_63_12", "Independent_63_13": "Independent_63_13", "Independent_63_14": "Independent_63_14", "Independent_63_15": "Independent_63_15", "Independent_63_16": "Independent_63_16", "Independent_63_17": "Independent_63_17", "Independent_63_18": "Independent_63_18", "Independent_63_9": "Independent_63_9", "Independent_64_18": "Independent_64_18", "Independent_64_19": "Independent_64_19", "Independent_64_20": "Independent_64_20", "Independent_64_21": "Independent_64_21", "Independent_64_22": "Independent_64_22", "Independent_64_23": "Independent_64_23", "Independent_64_24": "Independent_64_24", "Independent_64_25": "Independent_64_25", "Independent_64_26": "Independent_64_26", "Independent_64_27": "Independent_64_27", "Independent_65_11": "Independent_65_11", "Independent_65_12": "Independent_65_12", "Independent_65_13": "Independent_65_13", "Independent_66_10": "Independent_66_10", "Independent_66_11": "Independent_66_11", "Independent_66_12": "Independent_66_12", "Independent_66_13": "Independent_66_13", "Independent_66_14": "Independent_66_14", "Independent_66_15": "Independent_66_15", "Independent_66_16": "Independent_66_16", "Independent_66_17": "Independent_66_17", "Independent_67_10": "Independent_67_10", "Independent_67_11": "Independent_67_11", "Independent_67_12": "Independent_67_12", "Independent_67_13": "Independent_67_13", "Independent_67_14": "Independent_67_14", "Independent_67_15": "Independent_67_15", "Independent_67_9": "Independent_67_9", "Independent_68_10": "Independent_68_10", "Independent_68_11": "Independent_68_11", "Independent_68_12": "Independent_68_12", "Independent_68_13": "Independent_68_13", "Independent_68_14": "Independent_68_14", "Independent_68_15": "Independent_68_15", "Independent_68_6": "Independent_68_6", "Independent_68_7": "Independent_68_7", "Independent_68_8": "Independent_68_8", "Independent_68_9": "Independent_68_9", "Independent_69_10": "Independent_69_10", "Independent_69_11": "Independent_69_11", "Independent_69_12": "Independent_69_12", "Independent_69_13": "Independent_69_13", "Independent_69_14": "Independent_69_14", "Independent_69_8": "Independent_69_8", "Independent_69_9": "Independent_69_9", "Independent_6_10": "Independent_6_10", "Independent_6_11": "Independent_6_11", "Independent_6_12": "Independent_6_12", "Independent_6_13": "Independent_6_13", "Independent_6_14": "Independent_6_14", "Independent_6_15": "Independent_6_15", "Independent_6_8": "Independent_6_8", "Independent_6_9": "Independent_6_9", "Independent_70_10": "Independent_70_10", "Independent_70_11": "Independent_70_11", "Independent_70_12": "Independent_70_12", "Independent_70_13": "Independent_70_13", "Independent_70_14": "Independent_70_14", "Independent_70_8": "Independent_70_8", "Independent_70_9": "Independent_70_9", "Independent_71_10": "Independent_71_10", "Independent_71_11": "Independent_71_11", "Independent_71_12": "Independent_71_12", "Independent_71_13": "Independent_71_13", "Independent_71_14": "Independent_71_14", "Independent_71_15": "Independent_71_15", "Independent_71_16": "Independent_71_16", "Independent_71_17": "Independent_71_17", "Independent_71_18": "Independent_71_18", "Independent_72_10": "Independent_72_10", "Independent_72_11": "Independent_72_11", "Independent_72_12": "Independent_72_12", "Independent_72_13": "Independent_72_13", "Independent_72_14": "Independent_72_14", "Independent_72_15": "Independent_72_15", "Independent_72_16": "Independent_72_16", "Independent_72_17": "Independent_72_17", "Independent_73_6": "Independent_73_6", "Independent_73_7": "Independent_73_7", "Independent_73_8": "Independent_73_8", "Independent_73_9": "Independent_73_9", "Independent_74_10": "Independent_74_10", "Independent_74_11": "Independent_74_11", "Independent_74_8": "Independent_74_8", "Independent_74_9": "Independent_74_9", "Independent_75_10": "Independent_75_10", "Independent_75_11": "Independent_75_11", "Independent_75_12": "Independent_75_12", "Independent_75_13": "Independent_75_13", "Independent_75_14": "Independent_75_14", "Independent_75_6": "Independent_75_6", "Independent_75_7": "Independent_75_7", "Independent_75_8": "Independent_75_8", "Independent_75_9": "Independent_75_9", "Independent_76_13": "Independent_76_13", "Independent_76_14": "Independent_76_14", "Independent_76_15": "Independent_76_15", "Independent_76_16": "Independent_76_16", "Independent_76_17": "Independent_76_17", "Independent_76_18": "Independent_76_18", "Independent_76_19": "Independent_76_19", "Independent_76_20": "Independent_76_20", "Independent_76_21": "Independent_76_21", "Independent_76_22": "Independent_76_22", "Independent_76_23": "Independent_76_23", "Independent_77_10": "Independent_77_10", "Independent_77_11": "Independent_77_11", "Independent_77_12": "Independent_77_12", "Independent_77_13": "Independent_77_13", "Independent_77_14": "Independent_77_14", "Independent_77_15": "Independent_77_15", "Independent_77_16": "Independent_77_16", "Independent_77_17": "Independent_77_17", "Independent_78_10": "Independent_78_10", "Independent_78_11": "Independent_78_11", "Independent_78_12": "Independent_78_12", "Independent_78_13": "Independent_78_13", "Independent_78_14": "Independent_78_14", "Independent_78_9": "Independent_78_9", "Independent_79_10": "Independent_79_10", "Independent_79_11": "Independent_79_11", "Independent_79_12": "Independent_79_12", "Independent_79_13": "Independent_79_13", "Independent_79_14": "Independent_79_14", "Independent_79_15": "Independent_79_15", "Independent_79_16": "Independent_79_16", "Independent_79_17": "Independent_79_17", "Independent_79_18": "Independent_79_18", "Independent_79_7": "Independent_79_7", "Independent_79_8": "Independent_79_8", "Independent_79_9": "Independent_79_9", "Independent_7_10": "Independent_7_10", "Independent_7_11": "Independent_7_11", "Independent_7_4": "Independent_7_4", "Independent_7_5": "Independent_7_5", "Independent_7_6": "Independent_7_6", "Independent_7_7": "Independent_7_7", "Independent_7_8": "Independent_7_8", "Independent_7_9": "Independent_7_9", "Independent_80_10": "Independent_80_10", "Independent_80_11": "Independent_80_11", "Independent_80_12": "Independent_80_12", "Independent_80_13": "Independent_80_13", "Independent_80_14": "Independent_80_14", "Independent_80_15": "Independent_80_15", "Independent_80_16": "Independent_80_16", "Independent_80_17": "Independent_80_17", "Independent_80_18": "Independent_80_18", "Independent_80_19": "Independent_80_19", "Independent_80_20": "Independent_80_20", "Independent_81_11": "Independent_81_11", "Independent_81_12": "Independent_81_12", "Independent_81_13": "Independent_81_13", "Independent_81_14": "Independent_81_14", "Independent_81_15": "Independent_81_15", "Independent_81_16": "Independent_81_16", "Independent_81_17": "Independent_81_17", "Independent_8_10": "Independent_8_10", "Independent_8_11": "Independent_8_11", "Independent_8_12": "Independent_8_12", "Independent_8_13": "Independent_8_13", "Independent_8_14": "Independent_8_14", "Independent_8_15": "Independent_8_15", "Independent_8_16": "Independent_8_16", "Independent_8_17": "Independent_8_17", "Independent_8_6": "Independent_8_6", "Independent_8_7": "Independent_8_7", "Independent_8_8": "Independent_8_8", "Independent_8_9": "Independent_8_9", "Independent_9_10": "Independent_9_10", "Independent_9_11": "Independent_9_11", "Independent_9_12": "Independent_9_12", "Independent_9_13": "Independent_9_13", "Independent_9_9": "Independent_9_9", "Indian National Congress": "Indian National Congress", "Indian National Socialistic Action Forces": "Indian National Socialistic Action Forces", "Jagrook Janta Party": "Jagrook Janta Party", "Jai Maha Bharath Party": "Jai Maha Bharath Party", "Janata Dal (United)": "Janata Dal (United)", "Jharkhand Jan Kranti Morcha": "Jharkhand Jan Kranti Morcha", "Jharkhand Loktantrik Krantikari Morcha": "Jharkhand Loktantrik Krantikari Morcha", "Jharkhand Mukti Morcha": "Jharkhand Mukti Morcha", "Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (Ulgulan)": "Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (Ulgulan)", "Jharkhand Party": "Jharkhand Party", "Jharkhand People's Party": "Jharkhand People's Party", "Johaar Party": "Johaar Party", "Lok Jan Vikas Morcha": "Lok Jan Vikas Morcha", "Lok Janshakti Party(Ram Vilas)": "Lok Janshakti Party(Ram Vilas)", "Lokhit Adhikar Party": "Lokhit Adhikar Party", "Mera Adhikaar Rashtriya Dal": "Mera Adhikaar Rashtriya Dal", "Nationalist Congress Party": "Nationalist Congress Party", "Navyug Pragatisheel Morcha": "Navyug Pragatisheel Morcha", "None of the Above": "None of the Above", "Nyaydharmsabha": "Nyaydharmsabha", "Peoples Party of India (Democratic)": "Peoples Party of India (Democratic)", "Purvanchal Mahapanchayat": "Purvanchal Mahapanchayat", "Rashtriya Deshaj Party": "Rashtriya Deshaj Party", "Rashtriya Jaihind Party": "Rashtriya Jaihind Party", "Rashtriya Janata Dal": "Rashtriya Janata Dal", "Rashtriya Jankranti Morcha": "Rashtriya Jankranti Morcha", "Rashtriya Jansangharsh Swaraj Party": "Rashtriya Jansangharsh Swaraj Party", "Rashtriya Lok Dal": "Rashtriya Lok Dal", "Rashtriya Republican Party": "Rashtriya Republican Party", "Rashtriya Samanta Dal": "Rashtriya Samanta Dal", "Rashtriya Suraksha Party": "Rashtriya Suraksha Party", "Republican Party of India (A)": "Republican Party of India (A)", "Right to Recall Party": "Right to Recall Party", "Sadan Vikas Party": "Sadan Vikas Party", "Samajwadi Party": "Samajwadi Party", "Samata Party": "Samata Party", "Sampoorna Bharat Kranti Party": "Sampoorna Bharat Kranti Party", "Shiv Sena": "Shiv Sena", "Social Democratic Party Of India": "Social Democratic Party Of India", "Socialist Unity Centre Of India (COMMUNIST)": "Socialist Unity Centre Of India (COMMUNIST)", "Swabhiman Party": "Swabhiman Party", "Swatantra Rashtravadi Party": "Swatantra Rashtravadi Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 81, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 81, "cast_gt_registered": 81}, "n_stations_flagged": 81, "created_at": "2026-07-07T00:58:25.036004", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.381, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.281, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.281, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 81}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b6d5d2b464fd4367a1266be019531a54", "name": "India 2025 local (overnight india_delhi_2025_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2025, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thecont1/india-votes-data/master/data/csv/2025Assembly-DL.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AAP": "AAP", "Aam_Aadmi_Parivartan_Party": "Aam_Aadmi_Parivartan_Party", "Aam_Aadmi_Sangharsh_Party_S": "Aam_Aadmi_Sangharsh_Party_S", "Aam_Janmat_Party": "Aam_Janmat_Party", "Aam_Janshakti_Party": "Aam_Janshakti_Party", "Aam_Janta_Party_India": "Aam_Janta_Party_India", "Aapki_Apni_Party_Peoples": "Aapki_Apni_Party_Peoples", "Aapsi_Sahyog_Party": "Aapsi_Sahyog_Party", "Aazad_Samaj_Party_Kanshi_Ram": "Aazad_Samaj_Party_Kanshi_Ram", "Abhinav_Bharat_Party": "Abhinav_Bharat_Party", "Adarshwaadi_Congress_Party": "Adarshwaadi_Congress_Party", "Aihra_National_Party": "Aihra_National_Party", "Akhil_Bharatiya_Socialist_Party": "Akhil_Bharatiya_Socialist_Party", "Akhil_Bhartiya_Manavatavadi_Party": "Akhil_Bhartiya_Manavatavadi_Party", "All_India_Forward_Bloc": "All_India_Forward_Bloc", "All_India_Majlis_E_Ittehadul_Muslimeen": "All_India_Majlis_E_Ittehadul_Muslimeen", "All_India_National_Raksha_Sena": "All_India_National_Raksha_Sena", "Aman_Samaj_Party": "Aman_Samaj_Party", "Asankhya_Samaj_Party": "Asankhya_Samaj_Party", "Atulya_Bharat_Party": "Atulya_Bharat_Party", "Azad_Adhikar_Sena": "Azad_Adhikar_Sena", "Azad_Samaj_Party": "Azad_Samaj_Party", "BJP": "BJP", "BSP": "BSP", "Bahujan_Dravida_Party": "Bahujan_Dravida_Party", "Bahujan_Shoshit_Samaj_Sangharsh_Samta_Party": "Bahujan_Shoshit_Samaj_Sangharsh_Samta_Party", "Bharat_Lok_Sewak_Party": "Bharat_Lok_Sewak_Party", "Bharatheeya_Jawan_Kisan_Party": "Bharatheeya_Jawan_Kisan_Party", "Bharatiy_Aam_Janta_Adhikar_Party": "Bharatiy_Aam_Janta_Adhikar_Party", "Bharatiya_Liberal_Party": "Bharatiya_Liberal_Party", "Bharatiya_Sampuran_Krantikari_Party": "Bharatiya_Sampuran_Krantikari_Party", "Bharatiya_Sarvodaya_Kranti_Party": "Bharatiya_Sarvodaya_Kranti_Party", "Bharatrashtra_Democratic_Party": "Bharatrashtra_Democratic_Party", "Bhartiya_Insan_Party": "Bhartiya_Insan_Party", "Bhartiya_Janta_Dal_Integrated": "Bhartiya_Janta_Dal_Integrated", "Bhartiya_Krishak_Dal": "Bhartiya_Krishak_Dal", "Bhartiya_Mahasangh_Party": "Bhartiya_Mahasangh_Party", "Bhartiya_Panchsheel_Party": "Bhartiya_Panchsheel_Party", "Bhartiya_Rashtrawadi_Party": "Bhartiya_Rashtrawadi_Party", "Bhartiya_Rashtriya_Dal": "Bhartiya_Rashtriya_Dal", "Bhartiya_Rashtriya_Jansatta": "Bhartiya_Rashtriya_Jansatta", "Bhim_Sena": "Bhim_Sena", "Blue_India_Party": "Blue_India_Party", "Buland_Bharat_Party": "Buland_Bharat_Party", "Communist_Party_of_India": "Communist_Party_of_India", "Communist_Party_of_India_Marxist": "Communist_Party_of_India_Marxist", "Communist_Party_of_India_Marxist_Leninist_Liberation": "Communist_Party_of_India_Marxist_Leninist_Liberation", "Delhi_Janta_Party": "Delhi_Janta_Party", "Gareeb_Aadmi_Party": "Gareeb_Aadmi_Party", "Garib_Ekta_Party": "Garib_Ekta_Party", "Hamara_Sahi_Vikalp_Party": "Hamara_Sahi_Vikalp_Party", "Haryana_Jansena_Party": "Haryana_Jansena_Party", "INC": "INC", "Independent": "Independent", "Indian_National_Socialistic_Action_Forces": "Indian_National_Socialistic_Action_Forces", "Jai_Maha_Bharath_Party": "Jai_Maha_Bharath_Party", "Jan_Samuh_Party": "Jan_Samuh_Party", "Janata_Dal_United": "Janata_Dal_United", "Janhit_Dal": "Janhit_Dal", "Jantantrik_Samta_Party": "Jantantrik_Samta_Party", "Jatiya_Jana_Sena_Party": "Jatiya_Jana_Sena_Party", "Lok_Janshakti_Party_Ram_Vilas": "Lok_Janshakti_Party_Ram_Vilas", "Magadh_Congress_of_Inda": "Magadh_Congress_of_Inda", "Matrubhoomi_Sewa_Party": "Matrubhoomi_Sewa_Party", "NOTA": "NOTA", "National_Loktantrik_Party": "National_Loktantrik_Party", "National_Youth_Party": "National_Youth_Party", "Nationalist_Congress_Party": "Nationalist_Congress_Party", "Navarang_Congress_Party": "Navarang_Congress_Party", "New_India_United_Party": "New_India_United_Party", "One_Bharat_Citizen_Party": "One_Bharat_Citizen_Party", "Peace_Party": "Peace_Party", "Peoples_Green_Party": "Peoples_Green_Party", "Peoples_Party_of_India_Democratic": "Peoples_Party_of_India_Democratic", "Proutist_Bloc_India": "Proutist_Bloc_India", "Rachnatmak_Jan_Morcha": "Rachnatmak_Jan_Morcha", "Rashtra_Nirman_Party": "Rashtra_Nirman_Party", "Rashtravadi_Janata_Party": "Rashtravadi_Janata_Party", "Rashtravadi_Loktantrik_Party_India": "Rashtravadi_Loktantrik_Party_India", "Rashtrawadi_Janlok_Party_Satya": "Rashtrawadi_Janlok_Party_Satya", "Rashtriya_Aikta_Manch_Party": "Rashtriya_Aikta_Manch_Party", "Rashtriya_Bahujan_Congress_Party": "Rashtriya_Bahujan_Congress_Party", "Rashtriya_Janmorcha": "Rashtriya_Janmorcha", "Rashtriya_Janshakti_Party_Secular": "Rashtriya_Janshakti_Party_Secular", "Rashtriya_Lok_Janshakti_Party": "Rashtriya_Lok_Janshakti_Party", "Rashtriya_Lok_Sevak_Party": "Rashtriya_Lok_Sevak_Party", "Rashtriya_Manav_Party": "Rashtriya_Manav_Party", "Rashtriya_Rashtrawadi_Party": "Rashtriya_Rashtrawadi_Party", "Rashtriya_Republican_Party": "Rashtriya_Republican_Party", "Republican_Party_of_India_Athawale": "Republican_Party_of_India_Athawale", "Republican_Sena": "Republican_Sena", "Right_to_Recall_Party": "Right_to_Recall_Party", "Samaj_Vikas_Kranti_Party": "Samaj_Vikas_Kranti_Party", "Samarth_Bharatvarsh_Party": "Samarth_Bharatvarsh_Party", "Samata_Party": "Samata_Party", "Samrat_Mihir_Bhoj_Samaj_Party": "Samrat_Mihir_Bhoj_Samaj_Party", "Sanjhi_Virasat_Party": "Sanjhi_Virasat_Party", "Sarvodaya_Prabhat_Party": "Sarvodaya_Prabhat_Party", "Social_Democratic_Party_Of_India": "Social_Democratic_Party_Of_India", "Socialist_Unity_Centre_Of_India_COMMUNIST": "Socialist_Unity_Centre_Of_India_COMMUNIST", "Suheldev_Bharatiya_Samaj_Party": "Suheldev_Bharatiya_Samaj_Party", "Swaraj_Bhartiya_Nyay_Party": "Swaraj_Bhartiya_Nyay_Party", "Swatantra_Jantaraj_Party": "Swatantra_Jantaraj_Party", "Veer_Janshakti_Party": "Veer_Janshakti_Party", "Voice_of_Awam_Party": "Voice_of_Awam_Party", "Voters_Party_International": "Voters_Party_International", "Yuva_Bharat_Rashtraseva_Party": "Yuva_Bharat_Rashtraseva_Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 70, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 70, "registered_not_positive": 70}, "n_stations_flagged": 70, "created_at": "2026-07-07T00:58:21.326961", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.377, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.26, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.472, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.45, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.377, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.377, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.26, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.26, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.534, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.667, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.684, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.684, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.458, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.458, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 70}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e0aa933e46a3422fbbb2d69725c2a833", "name": "India 2022 local (overnight india_himachal_2022_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Himachal_Pradesh/Himachal_Pradesh_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AAAP": "AAAP", "BJP": "BJP", "BSP": "BSP", "Bhartiya Veer Dal": "Bhartiya Veer Dal", "CPI": "CPI", "Communist Party of India(Marxist)": "Communist Party of India(Marxist)", "Himachal Jan Kranti Party": "Himachal Jan Kranti Party", "Himachal Janta Party": "Himachal Janta Party", "Hindu Samaj Party": "Hindu Samaj Party", "INC": "INC", "IND": "IND", "NOTA": "NOTA", "Rashtriya Devbhumi Party": "Rashtriya Devbhumi Party", "Rashtriya Lokneeti Party": "Rashtriya Lokneeti Party", "Sainik Samaj Party": "Sainik Samaj Party", "Swabhiman Party": "Swabhiman Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 68, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-07T00:58:19.329279", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.384, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.291, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.384, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.384, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.291, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.291, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.553, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.764, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.442, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 68}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f940f3f32b8245ab9e2343bae2c339a5", "name": "Mexico 2024 local (overnight mexico_queretaro_city_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://prep2024qro.ieeq.mx/assets/data/20240603_1035_PREP_QRO.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"macias_olvera_pan_pri_prd": "macias_olvera_pan_pri_prd", "tapia_franco_morena_pt_pvem": "tapia_franco_morena_pt_pvem", "aguado_romero_mc": "aguado_romero_mc", "arce_islas_pqs": "arce_islas_pqs", "no_registradas": "no_registradas"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1380, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 26, "cast_gt_registered": 26}, "n_stations_flagged": 32, "created_at": "2026-07-07T00:20:48.475472", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1380}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b10107930ea44a668b571da2d2ec41f6", "name": "Mexico 2024 local (overnight mexico_chihuahua_city_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ieechihuahua.org.mx/sistema/archivos/Documentos de consulta/Docs/Resultados Computos BD/BD/Ayu_2024_Casillas.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PVEM": "PVEM", "MC": "MC", "MRCH": "MRCH", "PUEBLO": "PUEBLO", "FUERZA_Y_CORAZON_PAN_PRI_PRD": "FUERZA_Y_CORAZON_PAN_PRI_PRD", "SIGAMOS_HACIENDO_HISTORIA_PT_MORENA": "SIGAMOS_HACIENDO_HISTORIA_PT_MORENA", "CAND_NO_REG": "CAND_NO_REG"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1348, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 8, "cast_valid_mismatch": 215, "registered_not_positive": 6, "votes_gt_valid": 215}, "n_stations_flagged": 223, "created_at": "2026-07-07T00:20:43.678526", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1348}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "65985bb5746545c58c484eb532ec368d", "name": "Mexico 2024 local (overnight mexico_saltillo_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://iecoah.org.mx/archivos/Transparencia/resultados-electorales/AYUNTAMIENTOS2024%20X%20CASILLA.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PAN": "PAN", "PRI_PRD_UDC_Javier_Diaz": "PRI_PRD_UDC_Javier_Diaz", "PVEM": "PVEM", "PT": "PT", "MC": "MC", "MORENA": "MORENA", "candidato_no_registrado": "candidato_no_registrado"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1086, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 7, "cast_gt_registered": 7}, "n_stations_flagged": 7, "created_at": "2026-07-07T00:20:39.735555", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1086}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1ca1dc5fd30f474d91837db86ae422af", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_ananindeua_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_PA.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"daniel_barbosa_santos": "daniel_barbosa_santos", "antonio_leocadio_dos_santos": "antonio_leocadio_dos_santos", "waldemiro_sanova": "waldemiro_sanova", "maria_iranilse_pinheiro": "maria_iranilse_pinheiro", "eliel_pereira_faustino_filho": "eliel_pereira_faustino_filho", "thiago_luan_bessa_martins": "thiago_luan_bessa_martins"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 999, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 999, "registered_not_positive": 999}, "n_stations_flagged": 999, "created_at": "2026-07-07T00:20:35.789054", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 999}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ebf036f249dc4a0d964a004f185cba03", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_diadema_2024_mayor_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"takaharu_yamauchi": "takaharu_yamauchi", "jose_de_filippi_junior": "jose_de_filippi_junior"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 934, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 934, "registered_not_positive": 934}, "n_stations_flagged": 934, "created_at": "2026-07-07T00:20:32.425593", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 934}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b197d371a3df489084bc211ae22a488c", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_piracicaba_2024_mayor_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_SP.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"helinho_zanatta": "helinho_zanatta", "barjas_negri": "barjas_negri"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 890, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 890, "cast_gt_registered": 890}, "n_stations_flagged": 890, "created_at": "2026-07-07T00:20:29.097123", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 890}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ac24724910974037a839e489867219e3", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil-bauru-2024-mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_SP.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"antonio_izzo_filho": "antonio_izzo_filho", "chiara_ranieri_bassetto": "chiara_ranieri_bassetto", "clodoaldo_armando_gazzetta": "clodoaldo_armando_gazzetta", "jos_xaides_de_sampaio_alves": "jos_xaides_de_sampaio_alves", "marcos_rog_rio_jesus_chagas": "marcos_rog_rio_jesus_chagas", "paulo_rodrigues_lago": "paulo_rodrigues_lago", "raul_aparecido_gon_alves_paula": "raul_aparecido_gon_alves_paula", "su_llen_silva_rosim": "su_llen_silva_rosim"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 861, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 861, "cast_gt_registered": 861}, "n_stations_flagged": 861, "created_at": "2026-07-07T00:20:25.757403", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 861}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "13cd4ba0521c467f919ad1dfef3ad9a2", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_carapicuiba_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_SP.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"jose_roberto_da_silva": "jose_roberto_da_silva", "sergio_ribeiro_silva": "sergio_ribeiro_silva", "austriquiliano_lucena_martins": "austriquiliano_lucena_martins", "eduardo_ezequiel_alves_de_paula": "eduardo_ezequiel_alves_de_paula", "evaldo_claudino_de_almeida": "evaldo_claudino_de_almeida"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 839, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 839, "registered_not_positive": 839}, "n_stations_flagged": 839, "created_at": "2026-07-07T00:20:21.284593", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 839}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bbb724f65dbb4890b497de2cd649e1fe", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_guaruja_2024_mayor_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_SP.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"farid_said_madi": "farid_said_madi", "raphael_vitiello_silva": "raphael_vitiello_silva"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 690, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 690, "registered_not_positive": 690}, "n_stations_flagged": 690, "created_at": "2026-07-07T00:20:17.651704", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 690}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e1842105ea2948bca721102183ee4379", "name": "Mexico 2024 local (overnight mexico_cdmx_2024_jefatura.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://sicodid2024.iecm.mx/sicodid2024/files/bd-sicodid.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Clara_Brugada_MORENA_PVEM_PT": "Clara_Brugada_MORENA_PVEM_PT", "Santiago_Taboada_PAN_PRI_PRD": "Santiago_Taboada_PAN_PRI_PRD", "Salomon_Chertorivski_MC": "Salomon_Chertorivski_MC"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13503, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3497, "registered_not_positive": 44, "cast_gt_registered": 57}, "n_stations_flagged": 3543, "created_at": "2026-07-06T23:22:03.487791", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 13503}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "810091201d454e8480c7e367e6992c63", "name": "Mexico 2024 local (overnight mexico_puebla_city_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"coalition_pan_pri_prd_psi": "coalition_pan_pri_prd_psi", "coalition_pt_pvem_morena_nap_fxm": "coalition_pt_pvem_morena_nap_fxm", "mc": "mc"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2174, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2174, "registered_not_positive": 2174}, "n_stations_flagged": 2174, "created_at": "2026-07-06T23:21:56.345471", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2174}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "add9e997726d40e39f329233fb06d20a", "name": "Mexico 2024 local (overnight mexico_leon_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://2024computos.s3.amazonaws.com/basededatosCOMPUTOS/09062024_1200_COMPUTOS_GTO.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PAN_AlejandraGutierrezCampos": "PAN_AlejandraGutierrezCampos", "PRI_HildaLopezJimenez": "PRI_HildaLopezJimenez", "PRD_KarlaLiraDiaz": "PRD_KarlaLiraDiaz", "PVEM_GerardoFernandezGonzalez": "PVEM_GerardoFernandezGonzalez", "PT_MichelSantosSalcedo": "PT_MichelSantosSalcedo", "MC_JuanPabloDelgadoMiranda": "MC_JuanPabloDelgadoMiranda", "MORENA_VanessaMontesDeOca": "MORENA_VanessaMontesDeOca", "NoReg": "NoReg"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2086, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 188, "cast_valid_mismatch": 188, "cast_gt_registered": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 192, "created_at": "2026-07-06T23:21:49.986339", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2086}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "627eaed06e714a2589ecb660300f7c52", "name": "Mexico 2024 local (overnight mexico-zapopan-2024-mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "http://iepcjalisco.org.mx/sites/default/files/proceso_2024/Resultados/2024_SEE_AYUN_JAL_CAS.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Fuerza_y_Corazon_por_Jalisco": "Fuerza_y_Corazon_por_Jalisco", "Movimiento_Ciudadano": "Movimiento_Ciudadano", "Sigamos_Haciendo_Historia": "Sigamos_Haciendo_Historia", "candidato_no_registrado": "candidato_no_registrado"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1791, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 315, "cast_valid_mismatch": 315, "registered_not_positive": 9, "cast_gt_registered": 9}, "n_stations_flagged": 324, "created_at": "2026-07-06T23:21:44.257966", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1791}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ee980a9ee7f0424e9176c76a17714ed1", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_nova_iguacu_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_RJ.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cand_aluisio_gama_de_souza": "cand_aluisio_gama_de_souza", "cand_antonio_araujo_ferreira": "cand_antonio_araujo_ferreira", "cand_clebio_lopes_pereira": "cand_clebio_lopes_pereira", "cand_eduardo_reina_gomes_de_oliveira": "cand_eduardo_reina_gomes_de_oliveira", "cand_izabela_santos_de_oliveira_dutra": "cand_izabela_santos_de_oliveira_dutra", "cand_leonardo_mazzutti_sobral": "cand_leonardo_mazzutti_sobral"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1755, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1755, "registered_not_positive": 1755}, "n_stations_flagged": 1755, "created_at": "2026-07-06T23:21:38.993896", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1755}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5811a6964c8f456d80afe76a522a4a5b", "name": "Mexico 2024 local (overnight mexico_culiacan_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.ieesinaloa.mx/wp-content/uploads/Transparencia/SecretariaEjecutiva/RESULTADOS2024/Tablas-de-Resultados-PEL-2023-2024-Sinaloa.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Fuerza_y_Corazon_PAN_PRI_PRD_PAS": "Fuerza_y_Corazon_PAN_PRI_PRD_PAS", "MORENA": "MORENA", "PVEM": "PVEM", "PT": "PT", "MC": "MC", "PES": "PES"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1500, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1492, "registered_not_positive": 1500}, "n_stations_flagged": 1500, "created_at": "2026-07-06T23:21:34.300673", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1500}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f62b3e39107a423383c3c0dbaa52ef8c", "name": "MEXICO 2024 local (overnight mexico_merida_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.iepac.mx/public/micrositios/resultados-electorales/procesos-electorales/2024/RESULTADOS-AYUNTAMIENTOS.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Cecilia_Patron_PAN_PRI_PRD_NAY": "Cecilia_Patron_PAN_PRI_PRD_NAY", "Morena_PVEM_PT_MORENA": "Morena_PVEM_PT_MORENA", "MC": "MC", "candidato_no_registrado": "candidato_no_registrado"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1316, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 208, "registered_not_positive": 9, "cast_gt_registered": 11, "votes_gt_valid": 208}, "n_stations_flagged": 219, "created_at": "2026-07-06T23:21:30.215638", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1316}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7d7fa02dddd0423ea4818dd17c98e691", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_campos_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_RJ.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"wladimir_barros_assed_matheus_de_oliveira": "wladimir_barros_assed_matheus_de_oliveira", "madeleine_farias_rangel_dykeman": "madeleine_farias_rangel_dykeman", "jefferson_manhaes_de_azevedo": "jefferson_manhaes_de_azevedo", "raphael_elbas_neri_de_thuin": "raphael_elbas_neri_de_thuin", "alexandre_buchaul_de_azevedo": "alexandre_buchaul_de_azevedo", "fabricio_lirio_rodrigues": "fabricio_lirio_rodrigues", "fernando_sergio_trindade_crespo": "fernando_sergio_trindade_crespo"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1141, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1141, "cast_gt_registered": 1141}, "n_stations_flagged": 1141, "created_at": "2026-07-06T23:21:26.641609", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1141}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1921bb8514a94273bf43e094de281bf1", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_caxias_do_sul_2024_mayor_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_RS.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"adilo_didomenico": "adilo_didomenico", "mauricio_scalco": "mauricio_scalco"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1096, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1096, "cast_gt_registered": 1096}, "n_stations_flagged": 1096, "created_at": "2026-07-06T23:21:23.081178", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1096}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "03bfc3e4413a4b14925a44f69f8dd2ad", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_betim_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_MG.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"heron_domingues_guimaraes": "heron_domingues_guimaraes", "vinicius_braga_saraiva_de_resende": "vinicius_braga_saraiva_de_resende", "pedro_henrique_de_moura_silva": "pedro_henrique_de_moura_silva", "jose_augusto_bernardes": "jose_augusto_bernardes"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 981, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 981, "cast_gt_registered": 981}, "n_stations_flagged": 981, "created_at": "2026-07-06T23:21:19.814574", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 981}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "77a297c2fb4c4615bbbaace0235a1e34", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_maua_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_SP.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"francisco_marcelo_de_oliveira": "francisco_marcelo_de_oliveira", "anderson_alves_simoes": "anderson_alves_simoes", "amanda_oliveira_bispo": "amanda_oliveira_bispo", "atila_cesar_monteiro_jacomussi": "atila_cesar_monteiro_jacomussi", "jose_roberto_lourencini": "jose_roberto_lourencini"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 924, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 924, "registered_not_positive": 924}, "n_stations_flagged": 924, "created_at": "2026-07-06T23:21:16.721009", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 924}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cd8f48f75da645f792e88914c829d17c", "name": "Chile 2021 local (overnight chile-2021-gobernadores-r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Chile", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.servel.cl/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Segunda_Votacion__de__GORE_2021.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cand_CARLO_PEZO_CORREA": "cand_CARLO_PEZO_CORREA", "cand_CLAUDIO_ORREGO_LARRAIN": "cand_CLAUDIO_ORREGO_LARRAIN", "cand_CRISTINA_BRAVO_CASTRO": "cand_CRISTINA_BRAVO_CASTRO", "cand_EDUARDO_CORNEJO_LAGOS": "cand_EDUARDO_CORNEJO_LAGOS", "cand_ENRIQUE_SEGUNDO_LEE_FLORES": "cand_ENRIQUE_SEGUNDO_LEE_FLORES", "cand_EUGENIO_TUMA_ZEDAN": "cand_EUGENIO_TUMA_ZEDAN", "cand_FLOR_WEISSE_NOVOA": "cand_FLOR_WEISSE_NOVOA", "cand_FRANCISCO_PULGAR_CASTILLO": "cand_FRANCISCO_PULGAR_CASTILLO", "cand_JEZER_SEPULVEDA_DOMINGUEZ": "cand_JEZER_SEPULVEDA_DOMINGUEZ", "cand_JORGE_DIAZ_IBARRA": "cand_JORGE_DIAZ_IBARRA", "cand_JOSE_MIGUEL_CARVAJAL_GALLARDO": "cand_JOSE_MIGUEL_CARVAJAL_GALLARDO", "cand_KARINA_LORETTA_OLIVA_PEREZ": "cand_KARINA_LORETTA_OLIVA_PEREZ", "cand_KRIST_NARANJO_PENALOZA": "cand_KRIST_NARANJO_PENALOZA", "cand_LUCIANO_RIVAS_STEPKE": "cand_LUCIANO_RIVAS_STEPKE", "cand_LUIS_CUVERTINO_GOMEZ": "cand_LUIS_CUVERTINO_GOMEZ", "cand_MARCO_ANTONIO_DIAZ_MUNOZ": "cand_MARCO_ANTONIO_DIAZ_MUNOZ", "cand_MARCO_ANTONIO_PEREZ_BARRIA": "cand_MARCO_ANTONIO_PEREZ_BARRIA", "cand_MARCO_ANTONIO_SULANTAY_OLIVARES": "cand_MARCO_ANTONIO_SULANTAY_OLIVARES", "cand_MARIA_JOSE_GATICA_BERTIN": "cand_MARIA_JOSE_GATICA_BERTIN", "cand_MIGUEL_VARGAS_CORREA": "cand_MIGUEL_VARGAS_CORREA", "cand_OSCAR_CRISOSTOMO_LLANOS": "cand_OSCAR_CRISOSTOMO_LLANOS", "cand_PABLO_SILVA_AMAYA": "cand_PABLO_SILVA_AMAYA", "cand_PATRICIO_VALLESPIN_LOPEZ": "cand_PATRICIO_VALLESPIN_LOPEZ", "cand_RICARDO_HERIBERTO_DIAZ_CORTES": "cand_RICARDO_HERIBERTO_DIAZ_CORTES", "cand_RICARDO_KUSCHEL_SILVA": "cand_RICARDO_KUSCHEL_SILVA", "cand_RODRIGO_DIAZ_WORNER": "cand_RODRIGO_DIAZ_WORNER"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40382, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 40382, "registered_not_positive": 40382}, "n_stations_flagged": 40382, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:26:41.342947", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.865, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.841, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.777, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.542, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.615, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.616, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.068, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.068, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.905, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 40382}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e91b7196f7064b9bb90cd93ad44946f6", "name": "Mexico 2024 local (overnight mexico_tijuana_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ieebc.mx/archivos/estadisticas/elecciones/2024/ComputoPorCasilla_Mun%20Encabezados.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Flores_PAN": "Flores_PAN", "Jimenez_PRI": "Jimenez_PRI", "Peiro_PRD": "Peiro_PRD", "Blasquez_PT": "Blasquez_PT", "RuizMacfarland_MC": "RuizMacfarland_MC", "Badiola_PES": "Badiola_PES", "Burgueno_Morena_coal": "Burgueno_Morena_coal"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2795, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 19, "cast_gt_registered": 20}, "n_stations_flagged": 21, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:26:28.743833", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2795}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "88816e378711402d9dcc7a478cff0d44", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_campinas_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_SP.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ANGELINA DIAS DA SILVA": "ANGELINA DIAS DA SILVA", "D\u00c1RIO JORGE GIOLO SAADI": "D\u00c1RIO JORGE GIOLO SAADI", "PEDRO TOURINHO DE SIQUEIRA": "PEDRO TOURINHO DE SIQUEIRA", "RAFAEL FERNANDO ZIMBALDI": "RAFAEL FERNANDO ZIMBALDI", "WILSON KELLER DE MATOS": "WILSON KELLER DE MATOS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2521, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2521, "registered_not_positive": 2521}, "n_stations_flagged": 2521, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:26:20.576403", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2521}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f5cd49d8be1f4a00b5f520cf88d11616", "name": "Mexico 2024 local (overnight mexico-guadalajara-2024-mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "http://iepcjalisco.org.mx/sites/default/files/proceso_2024/Resultados/2024_SEE_AYUN_JAL_CAS.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Fuerza_y_Corazon_por_Jalisco": "Fuerza_y_Corazon_por_Jalisco", "Movimiento_Ciudadano": "Movimiento_Ciudadano", "Sigamos_Haciendo_Historia": "Sigamos_Haciendo_Historia", "candidato_no_registrado": "candidato_no_registrado"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2194, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 8, "registered_not_positive": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:26:13.110667", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2194}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "74f6ed8a38fd4b758f22d4d0cb4e1356", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil-sao-bernardo-2024-mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_SP.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"alex_spinelli_manente_23": "alex_spinelli_manente_23", "marcelo_de_lima_fernandes_20": "marcelo_de_lima_fernandes_20"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1996, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1996, "cast_gt_registered": 1996}, "n_stations_flagged": 1996, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:26:06.361544", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1996}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9e1aab11fb854722bcb5a87f59b86460", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil-sao-goncalo-2024-mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_RJ.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"nelson_ruas_dos_santos": "nelson_ruas_dos_santos", "dimas_de_paiva_gadelha_junior": "dimas_de_paiva_gadelha_junior", "josemar_pinheiro_de_carvalho": "josemar_pinheiro_de_carvalho", "viviane_batista_carvalho_da_silva": "viviane_batista_carvalho_da_silva", "jaqueline_kelly_pedroza_da_silva_barta": "jaqueline_kelly_pedroza_da_silva_barta", "reginaldo_da_silva_afonso": "reginaldo_da_silva_afonso"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1988, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1988, "registered_not_positive": 1988}, "n_stations_flagged": 1988, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:25:58.461391", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1988}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "84c362bb99d840d7ae3356c9da0c0149", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil-duque-de-caxias-2024-mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_RJ.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"wesley_teixeira": "wesley_teixeira", "jose_zito": "jose_zito", "celso_nascimento": "celso_nascimento", "netinho_reis": "netinho_reis"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1919, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1919, "registered_not_positive": 1919, "cast_gt_registered": 1919}, "n_stations_flagged": 1919, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:25:52.058121", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1919}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bb1557f22f0342a2a0bf0a256ab8cba3", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil-uberlandia-2024-mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_MG.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"dandara_tonantzin_silva_castro_13": "dandara_tonantzin_silva_castro_13", "daphiny_oliveira_costa_silva_28": "daphiny_oliveira_costa_silva_28", "gilberto_adenie_cunha_16": "gilberto_adenie_cunha_16", "leonidio_henrique_correa_boucas_45": "leonidio_henrique_correa_boucas_45", "paulo_sergio_ferreira_11": "paulo_sergio_ferreira_11"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1670, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1670, "cast_gt_registered": 1670}, "n_stations_flagged": 1670, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:25:46.551624", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1670}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "50b435d7edd747cfbc6ea1c33021933b", "name": "Mexico 2024 local (overnight mexico_monterrey_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://computo24.ieepcnl.mx/20240610_NL.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"de_la_garza_pri_pan_prd": "de_la_garza_pri_pan_prd", "rodriguez_mc": "rodriguez_mc", "sigamos_pvem_pt_morena": "sigamos_pvem_pt_morena", "vida": "vida", "eso": "eso", "partido_del_pueblo": "partido_del_pueblo", "no_registradas": "no_registradas"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1645, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 11, "registered_not_positive": 11}, "n_stations_flagged": 11, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:25:40.966587", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1645}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0f940ee4215c4b2db68e6590d484f60f", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil-osasco-2024-mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_SP.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"elissandro_marcio_silva_lindoso_30": "elissandro_marcio_silva_lindoso_30", "emidio_pereira_de_souza_13": "emidio_pereira_de_souza_13", "gerson_dias_pessoa_20": "gerson_dias_pessoa_20", "gloria_guilhermina_braga_brito_29": "gloria_guilhermina_braga_brito_29"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1635, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1635, "cast_gt_registered": 1635}, "n_stations_flagged": 1635, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:25:35.464069", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1635}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "785b0ac1ea87485082eda70d74a9ba43", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil-niteroi-2024-mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_RJ.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"alessandra_dos_santos_marques_29": "alessandra_dos_santos_marques_29", "bruno_bastos_lessa_20": "bruno_bastos_lessa_20", "carlos_roberto_coelho_de_mattos_junior_22": "carlos_roberto_coelho_de_mattos_junior_22", "danielle_bornia_de_castro_16": "danielle_bornia_de_castro_16", "guilherme_romeo_bussinger_goncalves_33": "guilherme_romeo_bussinger_goncalves_33", "rodrigo_neves_barreto_12": "rodrigo_neves_barreto_12", "taliria_petrone_soares_50": "taliria_petrone_soares_50"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1305, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1305, "registered_not_positive": 1305}, "n_stations_flagged": 1305, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:25:30.912417", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1305}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "730294594e2d4c8ab910859625a21920", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_juiz_de_fora_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_MG.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"maria_margarida_martins_salomao": "maria_margarida_martins_salomao", "charlles_thomacelli_evangelista": "charlles_thomacelli_evangelista", "ione_maria_moreira_dias_barbosa": "ione_maria_moreira_dias_barbosa", "julio_cesar_delgado": "julio_cesar_delgado", "isauro_jose_de_calais_filho": "isauro_jose_de_calais_filho", "victoria_de_fatima_de_mello": "victoria_de_fatima_de_mello"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1249, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1249, "cast_gt_registered": 1249}, "n_stations_flagged": 1249, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:25:26.653312", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1249}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d51839539fcd4d5a858f75253506d199", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_joinville_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_SC.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ADRIANO BORNSCHEIN SILVA": "ADRIANO BORNSCHEIN SILVA", "CARLITO MERSS": "CARLITO MERSS", "CARLOS HENRIQUE DE LIMA": "CARLOS HENRIQUE DE LIMA", "LUIZ CLAUDIO GUBERT": "LUIZ CLAUDIO GUBERT", "RODRIGO MEYER BORNHOLDT": "RODRIGO MEYER BORNHOLDT"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1205, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1205, "cast_gt_registered": 1205}, "n_stations_flagged": 1205, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:25:22.343125", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1205}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "669b82c356424c52a9a2f80c44872be6", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil-feira-de-santana-2024-mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_BA.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"jose_ronaldo_de_carvalho": "jose_ronaldo_de_carvalho", "jose_cerqueira_de_santana_neto": "jose_cerqueira_de_santana_neto", "carlos_medeiros_miranda": "carlos_medeiros_miranda"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1186, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1186, "cast_gt_registered": 1186}, "n_stations_flagged": 1186, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:25:16.749309", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1186}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "346a99fcb7574d1ba33fdf4c99b420d6", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_londrina_2024_mayor_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_PR.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"tiago_amaral": "tiago_amaral", "maria_tereza": "maria_tereza"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1181, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1181, "registered_not_positive": 1181}, "n_stations_flagged": 1181, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:25:12.324495", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1181}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4a4dc332635942bfa73d31f281d235e5", "name": "Chile 2021 local (overnight chile_2021_gobernadores_r1.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Chile", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ALDO VALLE ACEVEDO": "ALDO VALLE ACEVEDO", "ALFONSO BELMAR RODRIGUEZ": "ALFONSO BELMAR RODRIGUEZ", "ANA ARANEDA GOMEZ": "ANA ARANEDA GOMEZ", "ANDREA MACIAS PALMA": "ANDREA MACIAS PALMA", "AUCAN HUILCAMAN PAILLAMA": "AUCAN HUILCAMAN PAILLAMA", "CARLO PEZO CORREA": "CARLO PEZO CORREA", "CATALINA PAROT DONOSO": "CATALINA PAROT DONOSO", "CESAR AUGUSTO VARGAS ZURITA": "CESAR AUGUSTO VARGAS ZURITA", "CHRISTIAN MATHESON VILLAN": "CHRISTIAN MATHESON VILLAN", "CLAUDIO ANDRES LAGOS GUTIERREZ": "CLAUDIO ANDRES LAGOS GUTIERREZ", "CLAUDIO FLORES FLORES": "CLAUDIO FLORES FLORES", "CLAUDIO ORREGO LARRAIN": "CLAUDIO ORREGO LARRAIN", "CRISTINA BRAVO CASTRO": "CRISTINA BRAVO CASTRO", "EDUARDO CORNEJO LAGOS": "EDUARDO CORNEJO LAGOS", "ELIAS  SABAT ACLEH": "ELIAS  SABAT ACLEH", "ENRIQUE SEGUNDO LEE FLORES": "ENRIQUE SEGUNDO LEE FLORES", "ENZO MANUEL MORALES NORAMBUENA": "ENZO MANUEL MORALES NORAMBUENA", "ERIC AEDO JELDRES": "ERIC AEDO JELDRES", "ESTEBAN MANUEL VALENZUELA VAN TREEK": "ESTEBAN MANUEL VALENZUELA VAN TREEK", "EUGENIO TUMA ZEDAN": "EUGENIO TUMA ZEDAN", "FERNANDO ALFONSO GHIGLINO PIZARRO": "FERNANDO ALFONSO GHIGLINO PIZARRO", "FLOR WEISSE NOVOA": "FLOR WEISSE NOVOA", "FRANCISCO JAVIER SANDOVAL OJEDA": "FRANCISCO JAVIER SANDOVAL OJEDA", "FRANCISCO PULGAR CASTILLO": "FRANCISCO PULGAR CASTILLO", "FRANKLIN  GALLARDO GALLARDO": "FRANKLIN  GALLARDO GALLARDO", "FRESIA MONICA QUILODRAN RAMOS": "FRESIA MONICA QUILODRAN RAMOS", "GABRIEL ANDRES ROJAS ROJAS": "GABRIEL ANDRES ROJAS ROJAS", "GASTON ALFREDO FLORES ORDENES": "GASTON ALFREDO FLORES ORDENES", "GEORGE  BORDACHAR SOTOMAYOR": "GEORGE  BORDACHAR SOTOMAYOR", "GUILLERMO EDGARDO RIVEROS URZUA": "GUILLERMO EDGARDO RIVEROS URZUA", "IGNACIO MARIN ABUIN": "IGNACIO MARIN ABUIN", "IVAN ATILIO SEPULVEDA SEPULVEDA": "IVAN ATILIO SEPULVEDA SEPULVEDA", "JAIME SALVADOR SAEZ QUIROZ": "JAIME SALVADOR SAEZ QUIROZ", "JAVIER CASTILLO JULIO": "JAVIER CASTILLO JULIO", "JAVIER VEGA ORTIZ": "JAVIER VEGA ORTIZ", "JEZER SEPULVEDA DOMINGUEZ": "JEZER SEPULVEDA DOMINGUEZ", "JORGE DIAZ IBARRA": "JORGE DIAZ IBARRA", "JORGE FELIPE SEPULVEDA HAUGEN": "JORGE FELIPE SEPULVEDA HAUGEN", "JORGE FISTONIC GLASINOVIC": "JORGE FISTONIC GLASINOVIC", "JORGE MAURICIO FLIES A\u00d1ON": "JORGE MAURICIO FLIES A\u00d1ON", "JOSE ANTONIO VIDELA PONCE": "JOSE ANTONIO VIDELA PONCE", "JOSE MIGUEL CARVAJAL GALLARDO": "JOSE MIGUEL CARVAJAL GALLARDO", "JUAN DAGOBERTO VALDEBENITO MANSILLA": "JUAN DAGOBERTO VALDEBENITO MANSILLA", "JUAN FRANCISCO MERUVIA MERUVIA": "JUAN FRANCISCO MERUVIA MERUVIA", "JUAN JOSE CLAUDIO ARCOS SRDANOVIC": "JUAN JOSE CLAUDIO ARCOS SRDANOVIC", "JULIO BECERRA ESPINOZA": "JULIO BECERRA ESPINOZA", "KARINA LORETTA OLIVA PEREZ": "KARINA LORETTA OLIVA PEREZ", "KRIST  NARANJO PE\u00d1ALOZA": "KRIST  NARANJO PE\u00d1ALOZA", "LESTER PATRICIO CALDERON HERNANDEZ": "LESTER PATRICIO CALDERON HERNANDEZ", "LUCIANO RIVAS STEPKE": "LUCIANO RIVAS STEPKE", "LUIS ANTONIO LEVI ANINAO": "LUIS ANTONIO LEVI ANINAO", "LUIS CUVERTINO GOMEZ": "LUIS CUVERTINO GOMEZ", "LUIS FERNANDO VIVANCO MANRIQUEZ": "LUIS FERNANDO VIVANCO MANRIQUEZ", "LUIS HUMBERTO ARAVENA EGA\u00d1A": "LUIS HUMBERTO ARAVENA EGA\u00d1A", "LUZ CELENA SOTO VEGA": "LUZ CELENA SOTO VEGA", "MANUEL ARNOLDO AMESTICA GAETE": "MANUEL ARNOLDO AMESTICA GAETE", "MANUEL CORREA SILVA": "MANUEL CORREA SILVA", "MANUEL JESUS MILLONES CHIRINO": "MANUEL JESUS MILLONES CHIRINO", "MARCO ANTONIO DIAZ MU\u00d1OZ": "MARCO ANTONIO DIAZ MU\u00d1OZ", "MARCO ANTONIO MATURANA SOTO": "MARCO ANTONIO MATURANA SOTO", "MARCO ANTONIO PEREZ BARRIA": "MARCO ANTONIO PEREZ BARRIA", "MARCO ANTONIO SULANTAY OLIVARES": "MARCO ANTONIO SULANTAY OLIVARES", "MARCO OYANEDEL ISSA": "MARCO OYANEDEL ISSA", "MARIA JOSE GATICA BERTIN": "MARIA JOSE GATICA BERTIN", "MIGUEL VARGAS CORREA": "MIGUEL VARGAS CORREA", "NATHALIE  JOIGNANT PACHECO": "NATHALIE  JOIGNANT PACHECO", "ORLANDO SEVERO VARGAS PIZARRO": "ORLANDO SEVERO VARGAS PIZARRO", "OSCAR CRISOSTOMO LLANOS": "OSCAR CRISOSTOMO LLANOS", "OSCAR EDUARDO FERNANDEZ MARDONES": "OSCAR EDUARDO FERNANDEZ MARDONES", "PABLO ANTONIO ANDRES MALTES BISKUPOVIC": "PABLO ANTONIO ANDRES MALTES BISKUPOVIC", "PABLO SILVA AMAYA": "PABLO SILVA AMAYA", "PAOLA ALEJANDRA VENEGAS ARRIAGADA": "PAOLA ALEJANDRA VENEGAS ARRIAGADA", "PAOLA XIMENA PE\u00d1A MARIN": "PAOLA XIMENA PE\u00d1A MARIN", "PATRICIO VALLESPIN LOPEZ": "PATRICIO VALLESPIN LOPEZ", "PAULA VALERIA ORELLANA URIBE": "PAULA VALERIA ORELLANA URIBE", "PEDRO NEIRA MILCHIO": "PEDRO NEIRA MILCHIO", "RAUL EDUARDO RUDOLPHI ALTANER": "RAUL EDUARDO RUDOLPHI ALTANER", "RENE ROBERTO RUBESKA BALBOA": "RENE ROBERTO RUBESKA BALBOA", "RICARDO  CIFUENTES LILLO": "RICARDO  CIFUENTES LILLO", "RICARDO ENRIQUE RINCON GONZALEZ": "RICARDO ENRIQUE RINCON GONZALEZ", "RICARDO HERIBERTO DIAZ CORTES": "RICARDO HERIBERTO DIAZ CORTES", "RICARDO JAVIER MARTINEZ VALENCIA": "RICARDO JAVIER MARTINEZ VALENCIA", "RICARDO KUSCHEL SILVA": "RICARDO KUSCHEL SILVA", "RICARDO MANUEL GEORGES CID": "RICARDO MANUEL GEORGES CID", "ROBERTO PATRIZIO QUINTANA BARBATO": "ROBERTO PATRIZIO QUINTANA BARBATO", "RODRIGO DIAZ WORNER": "RODRIGO DIAZ WORNER", "RODRIGO EDUARDO ALEXIS MUNDACA CABRERA": "RODRIGO EDUARDO ALEXIS MUNDACA CABRERA", "ROJO EDWARDS SILVA": "ROJO EDWARDS SILVA", "TANIA VALENTINA CONCHA HIDALGO": "TANIA VALENTINA CONCHA HIDALGO", "VICENTE ALEJANDRO PAINEL SEGUEL": "VICENTE ALEJANDRO PAINEL SEGUEL"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 46087, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 46087, "cast_gt_registered": 46087}, "n_stations_flagged": 46087, "created_at": "2026-07-05T18:15:06.975188", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.865, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.841, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.777, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.542, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.615, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.616, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.068, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.068, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.905, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 46087}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fed76c3fa5b9453fbe2bc353092b51d4", "name": "Argentina 2023 local (overnight argentina-jujuy-2023-governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electoraljujuy.gob.ar/Contenido/TEP/Estadisticas/20230705/Final.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"libres_del_sur": "libres_del_sur", "politica_obrera": "politica_obrera", "frente_jujuy_tiene_futuro": "frente_jujuy_tiene_futuro", "unidad_por_jujuy": "unidad_por_jujuy", "frente_cambia_jujuy": "frente_cambia_jujuy", "frente_de_izquierda": "frente_de_izquierda", "via_mas_libertarios": "via_mas_libertarios", "frente_justicialista": "frente_justicialista"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1778, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1762, "registered_not_positive": 1778}, "n_stations_flagged": 1778, "created_at": "2026-07-05T18:14:52.424923", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1778}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d39607c4f11a45aab78e6322e63d1c19", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_santo_andre_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_SP.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Gilvan Ferreira (PSDB)": "Gilvan Ferreira (PSDB)", "Bete Siraque (PT)": "Bete Siraque (PT)", "Luiz Zacarias (PL)": "Luiz Zacarias (PL)", "Eduardo Leite (PSB)": "Eduardo Leite (PSB)", "Coronel Sardano (NOVO)": "Coronel Sardano (NOVO)", "Clenilza Panato (PCO)": "Clenilza Panato (PCO)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1725, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1725, "cast_gt_registered": 1725}, "n_stations_flagged": 1725, "created_at": "2026-07-05T18:14:47.235567", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1725}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e1d90d36f01a4f47a2019dd9ab45f423", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_sorocaba_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_SP.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CALEBE HENRIQUE NASCIMENTO DA SILVA": "CALEBE HENRIQUE NASCIMENTO DA SILVA", "DANILO MASCARENHAS DE BALAS": "DANILO MASCARENHAS DE BALAS", "PAULO JO\u00c3O ESTAUSIA": "PAULO JO\u00c3O ESTAUSIA", "RODRIGO MAGANHATO": "RODRIGO MAGANHATO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1638, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1638, "cast_gt_registered": 1638}, "n_stations_flagged": 1638, "created_at": "2026-07-05T18:14:42.528066", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1638}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "584192ddf44e462087420fa121bccdc8", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil-ribeirao-preto-2024-mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_SP.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ricardo_silva": "ricardo_silva", "marco_aurelio": "marco_aurelio"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1421, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1421, "cast_gt_registered": 1421}, "n_stations_flagged": 1421, "created_at": "2026-07-05T18:14:37.829432", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1421}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "638e504964e44efa81070120643e8dec", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_contagem_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_MG.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"MARILIA_APARECIDA_CAMPOS": "MARILIA_APARECIDA_CAMPOS", "GUSTAVO_OLIMPIO_SIQUEIRA_ROCHA": "GUSTAVO_OLIMPIO_SIQUEIRA_ROCHA", "GERALDO_JUNIO_DO_AMARAL": "GERALDO_JUNIO_DO_AMARAL", "SEBASTIAO_DE_OLIVEIRA_PESSOA": "SEBASTIAO_DE_OLIVEIRA_PESSOA", "DULCE_JOANE_SOUSA_MONTE": "DULCE_JOANE_SOUSA_MONTE"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1341, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1341, "registered_not_positive": 1341}, "n_stations_flagged": 1341, "created_at": "2026-07-05T18:14:32.176286", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1341}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "886f08093d1746f08159a02008b1bb21", "name": "Argentina 2023 local (overnight argentina_catamarca_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/2023_generales_1.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"union_por_la_patria": "union_por_la_patria", "juntos_por_el_cambio": "juntos_por_el_cambio", "la_libertad_avanza": "la_libertad_avanza"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1058, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T18:14:28.590475", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1058}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4f20e2dad7ad434e8e336f37b3459601", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_guarulhos_2024_mayor_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_SP.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"lucas_sanches_22": "lucas_sanches_22", "eloi_pieta_77": "eloi_pieta_77"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2831, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2831, "registered_not_positive": 2831}, "n_stations_flagged": 2831, "created_at": "2026-07-05T17:07:09.779414", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2831}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "48f926518946466cbc5f1a876757eca5", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil-sao-luis-2024-mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_MA.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"eduardo_braide_psd": "eduardo_braide_psd", "duarte_junior_psb": "duarte_junior_psb", "yglesio_moyses_prd": "yglesio_moyses_prd", "fabio_camara_pdt": "fabio_camara_pdt", "flavia_maciel_solidariedade": "flavia_maciel_solidariedade", "carlos_wellington_novo": "carlos_wellington_novo", "franklin_ferreira_psol": "franklin_ferreira_psol", "saulo_arcangeli_pstu": "saulo_arcangeli_pstu"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2173, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 2173, "cast_gt_registered": 2173}, "n_stations_flagged": 2173, "created_at": "2026-07-05T17:06:58.042199", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2173}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f3acf5e451b14a50bb4cb53b9973eba2", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_campo_grande_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_MS.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"adriane_lopes_11": "adriane_lopes_11", "rosiane_modesto_44": "rosiane_modesto_44"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2168, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2168, "registered_not_positive": 2168}, "n_stations_flagged": 2168, "created_at": "2026-07-05T17:06:49.466311", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2168}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "06ea0114a1f042b982e234313da105d4", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_teresina_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_PI.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"silvio_mendes_uniao": "silvio_mendes_uniao", "fabio_novo_pt": "fabio_novo_pt", "jose_pessoa_leal_pl": "jose_pessoa_leal_pl", "tonny_kerley_novo": "tonny_kerley_novo", "francinaldo_leao_psol": "francinaldo_leao_psol", "jose_santiago_up": "jose_santiago_up", "geraldo_carvalho_pstu": "geraldo_carvalho_pstu", "lourdes_melo_dc": "lourdes_melo_dc", "telsario_alencar_pmb": "telsario_alencar_pmb"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1701, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1701, "cast_gt_registered": 1701}, "n_stations_flagged": 1701, "created_at": "2026-07-05T17:06:43.050280", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1701}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "64986fb579e54f31886ac6d19f79d7be", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil-joao-pessoa-2024-mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_PB.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cicero_lucena": "cicero_lucena", "marcelo_queiroga": "marcelo_queiroga"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1625, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1625, "cast_gt_registered": 1625}, "n_stations_flagged": 1625, "created_at": "2026-07-05T17:06:37.339592", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1625}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "133513651aa24463b479c57274cb4d19", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_maceio_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_AL.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"JOAO HENRIQUE HOLANDA CALDAS (22)": "JOAO HENRIQUE HOLANDA CALDAS (22)", "RAFAEL DE G\u00d3ES BRITO (15)": "RAFAEL DE G\u00d3ES BRITO (15)", "LENILDA LUNA DE ALMEIDA (80)": "LENILDA LUNA DE ALMEIDA (80)", "ANIVALDO LUIZ DA SILVA (77)": "ANIVALDO LUIZ DA SILVA (77)", "MARINA NOBRE TEN\u00d3RIO CRIS\u00d3STOMO (29)": "MARINA NOBRE TEN\u00d3RIO CRIS\u00d3STOMO (29)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1619, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1619, "cast_gt_registered": 1619}, "n_stations_flagged": 1619, "created_at": "2026-07-05T17:06:31.110535", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1619}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b18f9019985e481385843db3c4766caa", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil-natal-2024-mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_RN.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"natalia_bastos_bonavides_13": "natalia_bastos_bonavides_13", "paulo_eduardo_da_costa_freire_44": "paulo_eduardo_da_costa_freire_44"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1407, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1407, "registered_not_positive": 1407}, "n_stations_flagged": 1407, "created_at": "2026-07-05T17:06:25.869394", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1407}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8912ea7ef33e465ab25070c089490445", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil-aracaju-2024-mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Emilia_Correa_22": "Emilia_Correa_22", "Luiz_Roberto_Dantas_12": "Luiz_Roberto_Dantas_12"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1313, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T17:06:21.239556", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1313}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f330d997c37444ca9852d71d28e01445", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil-cuiaba-2024-mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_MT.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"abilio_jacques_brunini_moumer_22": "abilio_jacques_brunini_moumer_22", "ludio_frank_mendes_cabral_13": "ludio_frank_mendes_cabral_13"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1274, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1274, "cast_gt_registered": 1274}, "n_stations_flagged": 1274, "created_at": "2026-07-05T17:06:16.763146", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1274}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "67e95066a7b342a398e6a1d9e685cb17", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil-porto-velho-2024-mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_RO.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"leo_moraes": "leo_moraes", "mariana_carvalho": "mariana_carvalho"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1181, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1181, "cast_gt_registered": 1181}, "n_stations_flagged": 1181, "created_at": "2026-07-05T17:06:12.339221", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1181}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5e39333f2e0c4b44a20e498bf34e0924", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil-florianopolis-2024-mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_SC.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"brunno_andrade_dias_29": "brunno_andrade_dias_29", "carlos_rogerio_muller_16": "carlos_rogerio_muller_16", "dario_elias_berger_45": "dario_elias_berger_45", "marcos_jose_de_abreu_50": "marcos_jose_de_abreu_50", "mateus_souza_35": "mateus_souza_35", "pedro_de_assis_silvestre_11": "pedro_de_assis_silvestre_11", "rogerio_silva_portanova_70": "rogerio_silva_portanova_70", "topazio_silveira_neto_55": "topazio_silveira_neto_55", "vanderlei_farias_13": "vanderlei_farias_13"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1147, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1147, "cast_gt_registered": 1147}, "n_stations_flagged": 1147, "created_at": "2026-07-05T17:06:07.998650", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1147}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "05be2c8bc0f74622bfb8d03dc37c9ad6", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_macapa_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_AP.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Aline Paranhos Varonil Gurgel (10)": "Aline Paranhos Varonil Gurgel (10)", "Antonio Paulo De Oliveira Furlan (15)": "Antonio Paulo De Oliveira Furlan (15)", "Gianfranco Gusmao De Azevedo (16)": "Gianfranco Gusmao De Azevedo (16)", "Jairo Palheta Da Silva Marques (29)": "Jairo Palheta Da Silva Marques (29)", "Sharon Dyan Braga De Oliveira (30)": "Sharon Dyan Braga De Oliveira (30)", "Patricia Lima Ferraz (45)": "Patricia Lima Ferraz (45)", "Paulo Cesar Lemos De Oliveira (50)": "Paulo Cesar Lemos De Oliveira (50)", "Gilvam Pinheiro Borges (70)": "Gilvam Pinheiro Borges (70)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 970, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 970, "cast_gt_registered": 970}, "n_stations_flagged": 970, "created_at": "2026-07-05T17:06:03.733016", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 970}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "30313ffe19e647bb8a1b363e33cf7ed2", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_vitoria_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_ES.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"LORENZO_SILVA_DE_PAZOLINI": "LORENZO_SILVA_DE_PAZOLINI", "JOAO_CARLOS_COSER": "JOAO_CARLOS_COSER", "LUCINIO_CASTELO_DE_ASSUNCAO": "LUCINIO_CASTELO_DE_ASSUNCAO", "LUIZ_PAULO_VELLOZO_LUCAS": "LUIZ_PAULO_VELLOZO_LUCAS", "CAMILA_COSTA_VALADAO": "CAMILA_COSTA_VALADAO", "EDUARDO_SPADETTO_RAMLOW": "EDUARDO_SPADETTO_RAMLOW"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 784, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 784, "cast_gt_registered": 784}, "n_stations_flagged": 784, "created_at": "2026-07-05T17:06:00.487236", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 784}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1880bd55c9434159bf7c4b6b52519ec4", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil-boa-vista-2024-mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_RR.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ARTHUR_HENRIQUE_15": "ARTHUR_HENRIQUE_15", "CATARINA_GUERRA_44": "CATARINA_GUERRA_44", "MAURO_NAKASHIMA_43": "MAURO_NAKASHIMA_43", "LINCOLN_FREIRE_50": "LINCOLN_FREIRE_50"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 755, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 755, "cast_gt_registered": 755}, "n_stations_flagged": 755, "created_at": "2026-07-05T17:05:57.108032", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 755}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c09155fcafa04be6a61645b40750c7f1", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_palmas_2024_mayor_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_TO.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"EDUARDO_SIQUEIRA_CAMPOS_20": "EDUARDO_SIQUEIRA_CAMPOS_20", "JANAD_VALCARI_22": "JANAD_VALCARI_22"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 629, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 629, "cast_gt_registered": 629}, "n_stations_flagged": 629, "created_at": "2026-07-05T17:05:54.214443", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 629}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "37ee99a1f9b542ceb1fb19cc5bed7ca7", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_goiania_2024_mayor_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_GO.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"sandro_mabel": "sandro_mabel", "frederico_cunha": "frederico_cunha"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2966, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 2966, "cast_gt_registered": 2966}, "n_stations_flagged": 2966, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:44:56.080291", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2966}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dfa089bc365b4456b648a4caa56ab696", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_sao_paulo_2024_mayor_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_SP.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"NUNES": "NUNES", "BOULOS": "BOULOS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 26513, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 26513, "cast_gt_registered": 26513}, "n_stations_flagged": 26513, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:43:03.615096", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 26513}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "256051e881254ff3929c97aca79096c3", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_salvador_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_BA.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"bruno_reis_uniao": "bruno_reis_uniao", "kleber_rosa_psol": "kleber_rosa_psol", "geraldo_junior_mdb": "geraldo_junior_mdb", "eslane_paixao_up": "eslane_paixao_up", "giovani_damico_pcb": "giovani_damico_pcb", "victor_marinho_pstu": "victor_marinho_pstu", "silvano_souza_dc": "silvano_souza_dc"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5059, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 5059, "registered_not_positive": 5059}, "n_stations_flagged": 5059, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:42:25.395858", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 5059}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "eb2682f2946e4aebb3cc909e5a1563df", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_norte_santander_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://observatorio.registraduria.gov.co/comprimidos/MMV_TERRITORIALES2023_NORTE_DE_SANTANDER.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"JOSE_GREGORIO_BOTELLO_ORTEGA": "JOSE_GREGORIO_BOTELLO_ORTEGA", "RAMON_ELI_TAMARA_RIVERA": "RAMON_ELI_TAMARA_RIVERA", "JUAN_GABRIEL_BACA_LOPEZ": "JUAN_GABRIEL_BACA_LOPEZ", "WILLIAM_VILLAMIZAR_LAGUADO": "WILLIAM_VILLAMIZAR_LAGUADO", "DIEGO_ARMANDO_GONZALEZ_TOLOZA": "DIEGO_ARMANDO_GONZALEZ_TOLOZA", "JHON_EDDISON_ORTEGA_JACOME": "JHON_EDDISON_ORTEGA_JACOME", "JORGE_EDUARDO_MORA_LOPEZ": "JORGE_EDUARDO_MORA_LOPEZ", "MARLON_CHACON_GARNICA": "MARLON_CHACON_GARNICA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4119, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 4119, "cast_gt_registered": 4119}, "n_stations_flagged": 4119, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:42:11.728157", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4119}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1a0dcff988444d66bb78994067e3e122", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil-curitiba-2024-mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_PR.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"35_CRISTINA REIS GRAEML": "35_CRISTINA REIS GRAEML", "55_EDUARDO PIMENTEL SLAVIERO": "55_EDUARDO PIMENTEL SLAVIERO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4022, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 4022, "cast_gt_registered": 4022}, "n_stations_flagged": 4022, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:41:57.550329", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4022}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "aa7cb1eed2e2480aba0a5d54ced2c806", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil-manaus-2024-mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_AM.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ALBERTO BARROS CAVALCANTE NETO": "ALBERTO BARROS CAVALCANTE NETO", "DAVID ANTONIO ABISAI PEREIRA DE ALMEIDA": "DAVID ANTONIO ABISAI PEREIRA DE ALMEIDA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3921, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 3921, "cast_gt_registered": 3921}, "n_stations_flagged": 3921, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:41:43.625987", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3921}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1f14d246ab884d85b71cf0bdba617fd4", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_belem_2024_mayor_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_PA.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Igor_Wander_Centeno_Normando": "Igor_Wander_Centeno_Normando", "Eder_Mauro_Cardoso_Barra": "Eder_Mauro_Cardoso_Barra"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2823, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2823, "registered_not_positive": 2823}, "n_stations_flagged": 2823, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:41:11.224750", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2823}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fb096837ba434042980d1d74bbe1cd47", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_sucre_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://observatorio.registraduria.gov.co/comprimidos/MMV_TERRITORIALES2023_SUCRE.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"enoc_miranda_guerra": "enoc_miranda_guerra", "marlon_enrique_ledesma_medina": "marlon_enrique_ledesma_medina", "juan_david_diaz_chamorro": "juan_david_diaz_chamorro", "mario_alberto_fernandez_alcocer": "mario_alberto_fernandez_alcocer", "inge_rodriguez_pestana": "inge_rodriguez_pestana", "julio_miguel_guerra_sotto": "julio_miguel_guerra_sotto", "lucy_ines_garcia_montes": "lucy_ines_garcia_montes", "remberto_luis_benitez_sierra": "remberto_luis_benitez_sierra", "ivan_feris_chadid": "ivan_feris_chadid"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2373, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 2373, "cast_gt_registered": 2373}, "n_stations_flagged": 2373, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:41:02.239652", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2373}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ecbbbbf1165d47169d5bc04983ef854b", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_la_guajira_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://observatorio.registraduria.gov.co/comprimidos/MMV_TERRITORIALES2023_LA_GUAJIRA.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"VOTOS_NO_MARCADOS": "VOTOS_NO_MARCADOS", "JAIRO_ALFONSO_AGUILAR_DELUQUE": "JAIRO_ALFONSO_AGUILAR_DELUQUE", "JIMMY_RAHALL_BOSCAN_TORRES": "JIMMY_RAHALL_BOSCAN_TORRES", "LAURA_DENIRYS_ANDRIOLIS_FREILE": "LAURA_DENIRYS_ANDRIOLIS_FREILE", "WILDER_NAVARRO_QUINTERO": "WILDER_NAVARRO_QUINTERO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2054, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 1398, "registered_not_positive": 2054, "cast_gt_registered": 2013}, "n_stations_flagged": 2054, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:40:54.096144", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2054}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a05f0a66ad6d43e8a972e92ca2719bc3", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_quindio_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://observatorio.registraduria.gov.co/comprimidos/MMV_TERRITORIALES2023_QUIND%C3%8DO.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votos_blanco": "votos_blanco", "votos_no_marcados": "votos_no_marcados", "cand_roberto_carlos_astorquiza_aguirre": "cand_roberto_carlos_astorquiza_aguirre", "cand_juan_miguel_galvis_bedoya": "cand_juan_miguel_galvis_bedoya", "cand_yenny_alexandra_trujillo_alzate": "cand_yenny_alexandra_trujillo_alzate", "cand_ernesto_amezquita_camacho": "cand_ernesto_amezquita_camacho", "cand_german_guzman_arias": "cand_german_guzman_arias", "cand_jorge_ricardo_parra_sepulveda": "cand_jorge_ricardo_parra_sepulveda", "cand_atilano_alonso_giraldo_arboleda": "cand_atilano_alonso_giraldo_arboleda", "cand_luis_carlos_serna_giraldo": "cand_luis_carlos_serna_giraldo"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1518, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1518, "registered_not_positive": 1518, "votes_gt_valid": 1403}, "n_stations_flagged": 1518, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:40:48.728983", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1518}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c6b8566753cf4df79829c5db123bb38c", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_casanare_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://observatorio.registraduria.gov.co/comprimidos/MMV_TERRITORIALES2023_CASANARE.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"alba_rocio_romero_garcia": "alba_rocio_romero_garcia", "cesar_augusto_ortiz_zorro": "cesar_augusto_ortiz_zorro", "guillermo_alexander_velandia_granados": "guillermo_alexander_velandia_granados", "hector_manuel_balaguera_quintana": "hector_manuel_balaguera_quintana", "joel_olmos_cordero": "joel_olmos_cordero", "luis_alexis_garcia_barrera": "luis_alexis_garcia_barrera", "marisela_duarte_rodriguez": "marisela_duarte_rodriguez"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1030, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1030, "registered_not_positive": 1030}, "n_stations_flagged": 1030, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:40:42.892967", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1030}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "94c0e454156d41c9b5d0d3a95d329985", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_choco_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://resultadosprec2023.registraduria.gov.co/json/ACT/GO/{puesto_code}.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"NUBIA CAROLINA CORDOBA CURI": "NUBIA CAROLINA CORDOBA CURI", "PATROCINIO SANCHEZ MONTES DE OCA": "PATROCINIO SANCHEZ MONTES DE OCA", "MARIO JAVIER MATURANA MORENO": "MARIO JAVIER MATURANA MORENO", "LUIS EMILIO ROMA\u00d1A MOSQUERA": "LUIS EMILIO ROMA\u00d1A MOSQUERA", "GILDER PALACIOS MOSQUERA": "GILDER PALACIOS MOSQUERA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 443, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 346, "cast_gt_registered": 15}, "n_stations_flagged": 349, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:40:40.474278", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 443}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8caa2c0be7ec4508bacfe045d4612121", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_caqueta_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://resultadosprec2023.registraduria.gov.co/json/ACT/GO/{puesto_code}.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"LUIS FRANCISCO RUIZ AGUILAR": "LUIS FRANCISCO RUIZ AGUILAR", "JAMES EDINSON URREGO CARVAJAL": "JAMES EDINSON URREGO CARVAJAL", "GERNEY CALDERON PERDOMO": "GERNEY CALDERON PERDOMO", "OSCAR CONDE ORTIZ": "OSCAR CONDE ORTIZ", "JORGE HERNAN CAMACHO PINZON": "JORGE HERNAN CAMACHO PINZON", "WILLIAM SANCHEZ AMAYA": "WILLIAM SANCHEZ AMAYA", "JONH JAIRO LOZANO BURGOS": "JONH JAIRO LOZANO BURGOS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 146, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 144, "cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 144, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:40:38.053317", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 146}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a093b48de90c4da8b2c3976a1bbdd02d", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_rio_de_janeiro_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_RJ.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cand_eduardo_da_costa_paes": "cand_eduardo_da_costa_paes", "cand_alexandre_ramagem_rodrigues": "cand_alexandre_ramagem_rodrigues", "cand_tarcisio_motta_de_carvalho": "cand_tarcisio_motta_de_carvalho", "cand_marcelo_cid_heraclito_do_porto_queiroz": "cand_marcelo_cid_heraclito_do_porto_queiroz", "cand_rodrigo_martins_pires_de_amorim": "cand_rodrigo_martins_pires_de_amorim", "cand_ana_carolina_sponza_braga": "cand_ana_carolina_sponza_braga", "cand_juliete_pantoja_alves": "cand_juliete_pantoja_alves", "cand_cyro_garcia": "cand_cyro_garcia", "cand_henrique_vital_brazil_simonard": "cand_henrique_vital_brazil_simonard"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12218, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 12218, "cast_gt_registered": 12218}, "n_stations_flagged": 12218, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:13:15.465921", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 12218}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4e7eb989ec91451bbddc352a99bbac93", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_fortaleza_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_CE.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"evandro_leitao_pt": "evandro_leitao_pt", "andre_fernandes_pl": "andre_fernandes_pl"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5274, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 5274, "cast_gt_registered": 5274}, "n_stations_flagged": 5274, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:12:32.881277", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 5274}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5965d0ec9cee44d9a5abdaf49d2deffc", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil-belo-horizonte-2024-mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_MG.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"BRUNO DE CASTRO ENGLER FLORENCIO DE ALMEIDA": "BRUNO DE CASTRO ENGLER FLORENCIO DE ALMEIDA", "FUAD JORGE NOMAN FILHO": "FUAD JORGE NOMAN FILHO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4764, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 4764, "registered_not_positive": 4764}, "n_stations_flagged": 4764, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:12:13.492395", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4764}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ad4a36d54b17488cae81c453cd41f51f", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_cordoba_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://observatorio.registraduria.gov.co/comprimidos/MMV_TERRITORIALES2023_C%C3%93RDOBA.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Angelica Verbel Lopez": "Angelica Verbel Lopez", "Gabriel Enrique Calle Aguas": "Gabriel Enrique Calle Aguas", "Ciro Manuel De Leon Brand": "Ciro Manuel De Leon Brand", "Erasmo Elias Zuleta Bechara": "Erasmo Elias Zuleta Bechara", "Juan De La Cruz Martinez Petro": "Juan De La Cruz Martinez Petro", "Votos en Blanco": "Votos en Blanco"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4170, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 4170, "cast_gt_registered": 4170}, "n_stations_flagged": 4170, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:11:57.712421", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4170}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ecc5067eb01d441d9ca43d422cb66bc5", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_tolima_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://observatorio.registraduria.gov.co/comprimidos/MMV_TERRITORIALES2023_TOLIMA.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votos_blanco": "votos_blanco", "votos_no_marcados": "votos_no_marcados", "cand_mauricio_jaramillo_martinez": "cand_mauricio_jaramillo_martinez", "cand_jorge_enrique_palomino_andrade": "cand_jorge_enrique_palomino_andrade", "cand_william_de_jesus_ospina_buitrago": "cand_william_de_jesus_ospina_buitrago", "cand_yully_esperanza_porras_barrero": "cand_yully_esperanza_porras_barrero", "cand_adriana_magali_matiz_vargas": "cand_adriana_magali_matiz_vargas"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3600, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 3595, "registered_not_positive": 3600, "cast_gt_registered": 3600}, "n_stations_flagged": 3600, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:11:42.412906", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3600}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "69b610ddb05f473f8acb571075d85c68", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_recife_2024_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_PE.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"DANIEL PIRES COELHO": "DANIEL PIRES COELHO", "DANIELLE GONDIM PORTELA": "DANIELLE GONDIM PORTELA", "EMANOEL TECIO TELES MORAES": "EMANOEL TECIO TELES MORAES", "GILSON MACHADO GUIMAR\u00c3ES NETO": "GILSON MACHADO GUIMAR\u00c3ES NETO", "JO\u00c3O HENRIQUE DE ANDRADE LIMA CAMPOS": "JO\u00c3O HENRIQUE DE ANDRADE LIMA CAMPOS", "LUDMILA MEDEIROS OUTTES ALVES": "LUDMILA MEDEIROS OUTTES ALVES", "SIMONE FONTANA": "SIMONE FONTANA", "VICTOR ASSIS DA SILVA": "VICTOR ASSIS DA SILVA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3409, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 3409, "cast_gt_registered": 3409}, "n_stations_flagged": 3409, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:11:30.269825", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3409}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8d9485546a704bdf8066af2593afbd3b", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_boyaca_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://observatorio.registraduria.gov.co/comprimidos/MMV_TERRITORIALES2023_BOYAC%C3%81.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cand_carlos_andres_amaya_rodriguez": "cand_carlos_andres_amaya_rodriguez", "cand_clementina_guayacan_guevara": "cand_clementina_guayacan_guevara", "cand_hosman_yaith_martinez_moreno": "cand_hosman_yaith_martinez_moreno", "cand_jose_giovany_pinzon_baez": "cand_jose_giovany_pinzon_baez", "cand_mauricio_alberto_landazabal_suaza": "cand_mauricio_alberto_landazabal_suaza", "cand_rodrigo_arturo_rojas_lara": "cand_rodrigo_arturo_rojas_lara", "cand_victor_manuel_leguizamo_diaz": "cand_victor_manuel_leguizamo_diaz"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3250, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 3250, "cast_gt_registered": 3247}, "n_stations_flagged": 3250, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:11:17.006942", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3250}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f3382cfbc78d4d099cea595abbc894a6", "name": "Brazil 2024 local (overnight brazil_porto_alegre_2024_mayor_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2024_RS.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"melo": "melo", "maria_do_rosario": "maria_do_rosario"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3064, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 3064, "cast_gt_registered": 3064}, "n_stations_flagged": 3064, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:11:04.664672", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3064}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "edf57f161153431d90b15c9fca019cde", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia-huila-2023-governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://observatorio.registraduria.gov.co/comprimidos/MMV_TERRITORIALES2023_HUILA.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cand_alberto_castillo_losada": "cand_alberto_castillo_losada", "cand_edwin_renier_valencia_rodriguez": "cand_edwin_renier_valencia_rodriguez", "cand_jesus_mendez_artunduaga": "cand_jesus_mendez_artunduaga", "cand_juan_carlos_gonzalez_mejia": "cand_juan_carlos_gonzalez_mejia", "cand_juan_de_jesus_cardenas_chavez": "cand_juan_de_jesus_cardenas_chavez", "cand_paulino_galindo_yustres": "cand_paulino_galindo_yustres", "cand_rodrigo_armando_lara_sanchez": "cand_rodrigo_armando_lara_sanchez", "cand_rodrigo_villalba_mosquera": "cand_rodrigo_villalba_mosquera", "cand_sandra_milena_hernandez_rincon": "cand_sandra_milena_hernandez_rincon", "cand_victor_hugo_santofimio_osorio": "cand_victor_hugo_santofimio_osorio"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2761, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 2761, "cast_gt_registered": 2761}, "n_stations_flagged": 2761, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:10:54.164195", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2761}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e1a2ab12e28c42db95abd415a7963304", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_cesar_2023_governor_per_mesa.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://observatorio.registraduria.gov.co/comprimidos/MMV_TERRITORIALES2023_CESAR.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cand_00001_CLAUDIA_MARGARITA_ZULETA_MURGAS": "cand_00001_CLAUDIA_MARGARITA_ZULETA_MURGAS", "cand_00002_ELVIA_MILENA_SANJUAN_DAVILA": "cand_00002_ELVIA_MILENA_SANJUAN_DAVILA", "cand_00003_SURELYS_LINETH_PANA_TORRES": "cand_00003_SURELYS_LINETH_PANA_TORRES", "cand_00004_KALEB_VILLALOBOS_BROCHEL": "cand_00004_KALEB_VILLALOBOS_BROCHEL", "cand_00005_KATIA_MILENA_OSPINO_ACEVEDO": "cand_00005_KATIA_MILENA_OSPINO_ACEVEDO", "cand_00006_ALEXANDRA_PINEDA_ORTIZ": "cand_00006_ALEXANDRA_PINEDA_ORTIZ", "cand_00007_ANTONIO_ERESMID_SANGUINO_PAEZ": "cand_00007_ANTONIO_ERESMID_SANGUINO_PAEZ", "cand_00008_JOSE_LUIS_MAYORCA_CASTILLA": "cand_00008_JOSE_LUIS_MAYORCA_CASTILLA", "cand_00009_LUZ_HELI_VILLALOBOS_NAVARRO": "cand_00009_LUZ_HELI_VILLALOBOS_NAVARRO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2732, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2732, "registered_not_positive": 2732}, "n_stations_flagged": 2732, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:10:44.200876", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2732}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a802c15a903e45938edaaa477568fb0e", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_meta_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://observatorio.registraduria.gov.co/comprimidos/MMV_TERRITORIALES2023_META.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"WILMAR ORLANDO BARBOSA ROZO": "WILMAR ORLANDO BARBOSA ROZO", "BAIRON ENRIQUE MUNOZ LIZARAZO": "BAIRON ENRIQUE MUNOZ LIZARAZO", "JOSE LUIS SILVA VALENCIA": "JOSE LUIS SILVA VALENCIA", "HAROLD FERNANDO BARRETO GONZALEZ": "HAROLD FERNANDO BARRETO GONZALEZ", "RAFAELA CORTES ZAMBRANO": "RAFAELA CORTES ZAMBRANO", "ANTONIO GENTIL AMAYA GUZMAN": "ANTONIO GENTIL AMAYA GUZMAN", "EDWARD STEVEN LIBREROS MAMBY": "EDWARD STEVEN LIBREROS MAMBY", "FLORENTINO VASQUEZ VILLA": "FLORENTINO VASQUEZ VILLA", "CLAUDIA MARCELA AMAYA GARCIA": "CLAUDIA MARCELA AMAYA GARCIA", "DARIO VASQUEZ SANCHEZ": "DARIO VASQUEZ SANCHEZ", "VOTOS_EN_BLANCO": "VOTOS_EN_BLANCO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2554, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2554, "registered_not_positive": 2554}, "n_stations_flagged": 2554, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:10:34.150297", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2554}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cc8107cf14624a53982b4ef56131aaba", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_pereira_2023_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://observatorio.registraduria.gov.co/comprimidos/MMV_TERRITORIALES2023_RISARALDA.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Maicol Lopera Cardona": "Maicol Lopera Cardona", "Oscar Cruz Ramirez": "Oscar Cruz Ramirez", "Martha Isabel Alzate Hincapie": "Martha Isabel Alzate Hincapie", "William Ospina Osorio": "William Ospina Osorio", "Diana Yaneth Osorio Bernal": "Diana Yaneth Osorio Bernal", "Mauricio Salazar Pelaez": "Mauricio Salazar Pelaez", "Reynaldo Steven Cardenas Espinosa": "Reynaldo Steven Cardenas Espinosa", "Votos En Blanco": "Votos En Blanco"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1347, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1347, "cast_gt_registered": 1347}, "n_stations_flagged": 1347, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:10:26.942581", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1347}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4fea16bb3e4c4a2da764364250587b6b", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_cauca_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://resultadosprec2023.registraduria.gov.co/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"VICTOR LIBARDO RAMIREZ FAJARDO": "VICTOR LIBARDO RAMIREZ FAJARDO", "JUAN DIEGO CASTRILLON ORREGO": "JUAN DIEGO CASTRILLON ORREGO", "JORGE OCTAVIO GUZMAN GUTIERREZ": "JORGE OCTAVIO GUZMAN GUTIERREZ", "EDUER MAURICIO MU\u00d1OZ NOGUERA": "EDUER MAURICIO MU\u00d1OZ NOGUERA", "YOLANDA MENESES MENESES": "YOLANDA MENESES MENESES", "DIANA SOCORRO PERAFAN HURTADO": "DIANA SOCORRO PERAFAN HURTADO", "NELSON MAZABUEL QUILINDO": "NELSON MAZABUEL QUILINDO", "MARIA LILIANA ARARAT MEJIA": "MARIA LILIANA ARARAT MEJIA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 808, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 3, "cast_valid_mismatch": 763}, "n_stations_flagged": 763, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:10:23.097732", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 808}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d0ff5c1a148e4ec2b5d52dd9d335360d", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_magdalena_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://resultadosprec2023.registraduria.gov.co/json/ACT/GO/{puesto_code}.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"FRANKLIN DEL CRISTO LOZANO DE LA OSSA": "FRANKLIN DEL CRISTO LOZANO DE LA OSSA", "RAFAEL ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ": "RAFAEL ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ", "EDWARD TORRES RUIDIAZ": "EDWARD TORRES RUIDIAZ", "MALLATH PAOLA MARTINEZ CANTILLO": "MALLATH PAOLA MARTINEZ CANTILLO", "MARTHA CRISTINA ALTAHONA ARIZA": "MARTHA CRISTINA ALTAHONA ARIZA", "OSCAR GUILLERMO SININNG DE ANGEL": "OSCAR GUILLERMO SININNG DE ANGEL", "EDGARDO DE JESUS PEREZ DIAZ": "EDGARDO DE JESUS PEREZ DIAZ"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 377, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2, "cast_valid_mismatch": 375}, "n_stations_flagged": 375, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:10:20.571036", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 377}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4650e510b00e46e1a3edf0f26592efd6", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_manizales_2023_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://resultadosprec2023.registraduria.gov.co/json/ACT/AL/{puesto_code}.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"JORGE EDUARDO ROJAS GIRALDO": "JORGE EDUARDO ROJAS GIRALDO", "PAULA ANDREA TORO SANTANA": "PAULA ANDREA TORO SANTANA", "CARLOS ARTURO BURITICA ATEHORTUA": "CARLOS ARTURO BURITICA ATEHORTUA", "GERMAN VALLEJO OBANDO": "GERMAN VALLEJO OBANDO", "JORGE ALBERTO BETANCURT RAIGOZA": "JORGE ALBERTO BETANCURT RAIGOZA", "MARTIN SIERRA QUIROZ": "MARTIN SIERRA QUIROZ", "MARTIN EMILIO RAMIREZ CARDONA": "MARTIN EMILIO RAMIREZ CARDONA", "FRANCISCO JAVIER GONZALEZ SANCHEZ": "FRANCISCO JAVIER GONZALEZ SANCHEZ", "JOHN ROBERT OSORIO ISAZA": "JOHN ROBERT OSORIO ISAZA", "MIGUEL TRUJILLO LONDO\u00d1O": "MIGUEL TRUJILLO LONDO\u00d1O"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 91, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 87}, "n_stations_flagged": 87, "created_at": "2026-07-05T16:10:19.270539", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 91}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7f348208719d47be96b81b6bce14abec", "name": "Peru 2021 parliamentary (overnight peru_2021_congreso.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Peru", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ACCION POPULAR": "ACCION POPULAR", "ALIANZA PARA EL PROGRESO": "ALIANZA PARA EL PROGRESO", "AVANZA PAIS - PARTIDO DE INTEGRACION SOCIAL": "AVANZA PAIS - PARTIDO DE INTEGRACION SOCIAL", "DEMOCRACIA DIRECTA": "DEMOCRACIA DIRECTA", "EL FRENTE AMPLIO POR JUSTICIA, VIDA Y LIBERTAD": "EL FRENTE AMPLIO POR JUSTICIA, VIDA Y LIBERTAD", "FRENTE POPULAR AGRICOLA FIA DEL PERU - FREPAP": "FRENTE POPULAR AGRICOLA FIA DEL PERU - FREPAP", "FUERZA POPULAR": "FUERZA POPULAR", "JUNTOS POR EL PERU": "JUNTOS POR EL PERU", "PARTIDO DEMOCRATICO SOMOS PERU": "PARTIDO DEMOCRATICO SOMOS PERU", "PARTIDO MORADO": "PARTIDO MORADO", "PARTIDO NACIONALISTA PERUANO": "PARTIDO NACIONALISTA PERUANO", "PARTIDO POLITICO CONTIGO": "PARTIDO POLITICO CONTIGO", "PARTIDO POLITICO NACIONAL PERU LIBRE": "PARTIDO POLITICO NACIONAL PERU LIBRE", "PARTIDO POPULAR CRISTIANO - PPC": "PARTIDO POPULAR CRISTIANO - PPC", "PERU PATRIA SEGURA": "PERU PATRIA SEGURA", "PODEMOS PERU": "PODEMOS PERU", "RENACIMIENTO UNIDO NACIONAL": "RENACIMIENTO UNIDO NACIONAL", "RENOVACION POPULAR": "RENOVACION POPULAR", "UNION POR EL PERU": "UNION POR EL PERU", "VICTORIA NACIONAL": "VICTORIA NACIONAL"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 86488, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 82885}, "n_stations_flagged": 82885, "created_at": "2026-07-05T00:14:14.923218", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.648, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.496, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.771, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.66, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.496, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.169, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.565, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.182, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.771, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.66, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.481, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 86488}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d709883494434fcbb71b04c2d92d5e60", "name": "Czechia 2013 parliamentary (overnight czech_2013_ps_per_okrsek.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.volby.cz/opendata/ps2013/ps2013_opendata.htm", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ANEO [14]": "ANEO [14]", "ANO 2011 [20]": "ANO 2011 [20]", "DSSS [18]": "DSSS [18]", "HLVZH\u016eRU [5]": "HLVZH\u016eRU [5]", "KAN [8]": "KAN [8]", "KDU-\u010cSL [11]": "KDU-\u010cSL [11]", "KS\u010cM [21]": "KS\u010cM [21]", "K\u010c [24]": "K\u010c [24]", "LEV 21 [22]": "LEV 21 [22]", "OB\u010c_2011 [16]": "OB\u010c_2011 [16]", "ODS [6]": "ODS [6]", "PB [12]": "PB [12]", "Pir\u00e1ti [3]": "Pir\u00e1ti [3]", "RDS [7]": "RDS [7]", "SPOZ [15]": "SPOZ [15]", "SZ [23]": "SZ [23]", "Ss\u010cR [10]": "Ss\u010cR [10]", "Suveren_ [13]": "Suveren_ [13]", "Svobodn\u00ed [2]": "Svobodn\u00ed [2]", "TOP 09 [4]": "TOP 09 [4]", "Zm\u011bna [9]": "Zm\u011bna [9]", "\u00dasvit [17]": "\u00dasvit [17]", "\u010cSSD [1]": "\u010cSSD [1]"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14872, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-05T00:13:12.123494", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.856, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.92, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.863, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.779, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.194, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.785, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.238, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.238, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.935, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "SPOZ", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "TOP 09", "margin": 9.6, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "CZE", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 14872}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5f44ec8fbd924e6398d01a3bbd83dfb4", "name": "MEXICO 2021 local (overnight mexico_chihuahua_2021_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://siceen21.ine.mx/ACTASSICEEN2021/download/LOCALES/2021/CHIH_PEL_2021.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"id_distrito_local": "id_distrito_local", "id_municipio": "id_municipio", "votos_candidato_no_reg": "votos_candidato_no_reg", "MARIA_EUGENIA_CAMPOS_PAN_PRD": "MARIA_EUGENIA_CAMPOS_PAN_PRD", "JUAN_CARLOS_LOERA_MORENA_PT_NACH": "JUAN_CARLOS_LOERA_MORENA_PT_NACH", "GRACIELA_ORTIZ_PRI": "GRACIELA_ORTIZ_PRI", "ALFREDO_PVEM": "ALFREDO_PVEM", "GUSTAVO_ELIZONDO_MC": "GUSTAVO_ELIZONDO_MC", "BRENDA_RIOS_PES": "BRENDA_RIOS_PES", "RSP": "RSP", "FXM": "FXM"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5501, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 35, "cast_valid_mismatch": 369, "registered_not_positive": 34, "votes_gt_valid": 5501}, "n_stations_flagged": 5501, "created_at": "2026-07-05T00:12:47.634148", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 5501}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4e933af7473b4e56ab4ce4f7f66eca7c", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_narino_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://observatorio.registraduria.gov.co/comprimidos/MMV_TERRITORIALES2023_NARI%C3%91O.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cand_berner_leon_zambrano_eraso": "cand_berner_leon_zambrano_eraso", "cand_carlos_alberto_portilla_rubio": "cand_carlos_alberto_portilla_rubio", "cand_carlos_alejandro_maya_aguirre": "cand_carlos_alejandro_maya_aguirre", "cand_claudia_ines_cabrera_tarazona": "cand_claudia_ines_cabrera_tarazona", "cand_edgar_gerardo_rosero_perez": "cand_edgar_gerardo_rosero_perez", "cand_luis_alfonso_escobar_jaramillo": "cand_luis_alfonso_escobar_jaramillo", "cand_maria_cristina_rivera_burbano": "cand_maria_cristina_rivera_burbano", "cand_nilza_maria_pantoja_agreda": "cand_nilza_maria_pantoja_agreda", "votos_blanco": "votos_blanco", "votos_no_marcados": "votos_no_marcados"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3952, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 3582, "cast_gt_registered": 3911, "registered_not_positive": 3952}, "n_stations_flagged": 3952, "created_at": "2026-07-05T00:12:30.239245", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3952}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9cfd40f43add45e8bc6523624e7894ac", "name": "Ecuador 2023 presidential (overnight ecuador_2023_r2_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Ecuador", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.cne.gob.ec/download/segunda-vuelta/?wpdmdl=45772", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"noboa": "noboa", "gonzalez": "gonzalez"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2602, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 2430, "registered_not_positive": 2602, "cast_gt_registered": 2595}, "n_stations_flagged": 2602, "created_at": "2026-07-05T00:12:17.704367", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.481, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.969, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.641, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.463, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.481, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.969, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.992, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.764, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.165, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.981, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.403, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.261, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.565, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.463, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.463, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.347, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.347, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.816, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.522, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.522, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.66, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.753, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.753, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2602}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "692341f2f35b436bade1957dad51a769", "name": "COLOMBIA 2023 local (overnight colombia_cartagena_2023_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://observatorio.registraduria.gov.co/comprimidos/MMV_TERRITORIALES2023_BOL%C3%8DVAR.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"dumek_jose_turbay_paz": "dumek_jose_turbay_paz", "eduardo_villanueva_orozco": "eduardo_villanueva_orozco", "fabio_aristizabal_angel": "fabio_aristizabal_angel", "gustavo_ramon_martinez_theran": "gustavo_ramon_martinez_theran", "jacqueline_del_carmen_perea_blanco": "jacqueline_del_carmen_perea_blanco", "javier_julio_bejarano": "javier_julio_bejarano", "javier_manuel_doria_arrieta": "javier_manuel_doria_arrieta", "jose_luis_osorio_galvis": "jose_luis_osorio_galvis", "judith_del_carmen_pinedo_florez": "judith_del_carmen_pinedo_florez", "nausicrate_perez_dautt": "nausicrate_perez_dautt", "richard_martinez_filoz": "richard_martinez_filoz", "william_garcia_tirado": "william_garcia_tirado", "votos_no_marcados": "votos_no_marcados"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2559, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2559, "registered_not_positive": 2559, "votes_gt_valid": 1055}, "n_stations_flagged": 2559, "created_at": "2026-07-05T00:12:06.625265", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2559}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "db0c738996794176a6edda8ad88387aa", "name": "Mexico 2021 local (overnight mexico_tlaxcala_2021_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://siceen21.ine.mx/ACTASSICEEN2021/download/LOCALES/2021/TLAX_PEL_2021.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cand_va_por_tlaxcala_pan_pri_prd": "cand_va_por_tlaxcala_pan_pri_prd", "cand_juntos_haremos_historia_morena": "cand_juntos_haremos_historia_morena", "cand_mc": "cand_mc", "cand_pissi": "cand_pissi", "cand_pes": "cand_pes", "cand_rsp": "cand_rsp", "cand_fxm": "cand_fxm", "votos_no_registrados": "votos_no_registrados"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1610, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 114, "registered_not_positive": 5, "cast_valid_mismatch": 114, "cast_gt_registered": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 123, "created_at": "2026-07-05T00:11:58.914467", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.624, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.534, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1610}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0d3138f4e0d241f6970d6b7be05eee86", "name": "Mexico 2021 local (overnight mexico_baja_california_sur_2021_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://siceen21.ine.mx/ACTASSICEEN2021/download/LOCALES/2021/BCS_PEL_2021.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"castro_morena_pt": "castro_morena_pt", "pelayo_pan_pri_prd_prs_phbcs": "pelayo_pan_pri_prd_prs_phbcs", "pvem": "pvem", "mc": "mc", "bcsc": "bcsc", "panalbcs": "panalbcs", "pes": "pes", "rsp": "rsp", "fxm": "fxm", "cand_ind1": "cand_ind1", "votos_no_registrados": "votos_no_registrados"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1037, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 105, "registered_not_positive": 14, "cast_gt_registered": 13, "votes_gt_valid": 105}, "n_stations_flagged": 119, "created_at": "2026-07-05T00:11:53.282107", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.624, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.534, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1037}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bf6fe480e67f441d94ee46d81f381d3d", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_bolivar_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://resultadosprec2023.registraduria.gov.co/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"YAMIL HERNANDO ARANA PADAUI": "YAMIL HERNANDO ARANA PADAUI", "ZAITH CARMELO ADECHINE CARRILLO": "ZAITH CARMELO ADECHINE CARRILLO", "MERY LUZ LONDO\u00d1O GARCIA": "MERY LUZ LONDO\u00d1O GARCIA", "YOLANDA WONG BALDIRIS": "YOLANDA WONG BALDIRIS", "DAVID ALFONSO MUNERA CAVADIA": "DAVID ALFONSO MUNERA CAVADIA", "GERMAN DARIO ZAPATA VERGARA": "GERMAN DARIO ZAPATA VERGARA", "LUTTERH LEONEL LARIOS CARDOZA": "LUTTERH LEONEL LARIOS CARDOZA", "CARLOS JAVIER RAMOS PEREZ": "CARLOS JAVIER RAMOS PEREZ", "LUIS ENRIQUE FLOREZ AGAMEZ": "LUIS ENRIQUE FLOREZ AGAMEZ"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 622, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1, "cast_valid_mismatch": 616}, "n_stations_flagged": 617, "created_at": "2026-07-05T00:11:49.567959", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 622}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "aa5e8ac07e72428280e9a6da882b6fa2", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_bucaramanga_2023_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"num_mesas": "num_mesas", "cand_jaime_andres_beltran_martinez": "cand_jaime_andres_beltran_martinez", "cand_edinson_fabian_oviedo_pinzon": "cand_edinson_fabian_oviedo_pinzon", "cand_consuelo_ordonez_de_rincon": "cand_consuelo_ordonez_de_rincon", "cand_jose_del_carmen_velasquez_pereira": "cand_jose_del_carmen_velasquez_pereira", "cand_alvaro_torres": "cand_alvaro_torres", "cand_jorge_alberto_figueroa_clausen": "cand_jorge_alberto_figueroa_clausen", "cand_giovanni_alvarez_maldonado": "cand_giovanni_alvarez_maldonado", "cand_carlos_felipe_parra_rojas": "cand_carlos_felipe_parra_rojas", "cand_ludwing_mantilla_castro": "cand_ludwing_mantilla_castro", "cand_manuel_eduardo_parada_rueda": "cand_manuel_eduardo_parada_rueda", "cand_carlos_fernando_sotomonte_garavito": "cand_carlos_fernando_sotomonte_garavito", "cand_luis_roberto_ordonez_ardila": "cand_luis_roberto_ordonez_ardila", "cand_jaime_calderon_herrera": "cand_jaime_calderon_herrera", "cand_diego_arturo_tamayo_salcedo": "cand_diego_arturo_tamayo_salcedo", "cand_horacio_jose_serpa_moncada": "cand_horacio_jose_serpa_moncada"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 88, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T00:11:47.301741", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 88}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0504f5ca542145c98b3519f8e24644c8", "name": "Guatemala 2023 presidential (overnight guatemala_2023_presidential_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Guatemala", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://segundaeleccion.trep.gt/ext/jsonData_gtm2023/1692574389/1692594771/GTM2023-segundaeleccion-20230820-231251.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Sandra_Torres_UNE": "Sandra_Torres_UNE", "Bernardo_Arevalo_Semilla": "Bernardo_Arevalo_Semilla", "contabilizada": "contabilizada"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 24529, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 26, "cast_valid_mismatch": 23290, "votes_gt_valid": 24343}, "n_stations_flagged": 24364, "created_at": "2026-07-04T22:47:10.488409", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.887, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.736, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.506, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.338, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.349, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.37, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.593, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.281, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.32, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.338, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.338, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.228, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.228, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.696, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 24529}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9f7d90ba32f4441fabe61974781e5c17", "name": "Czechia 2017 parliamentary (overnight czech_2017_ps_per_okrsek.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.volby.cz/opendata/ps2017/ps2017_opendata.htm", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ANO [21]": "ANO [21]", "BPI [13]": "BPI [13]", "CESTA [3]": "CESTA [3]", "DSSS [28]": "DSSS [28]", "DV 2016 [22]": "DV 2016 [22]", "KDU-\u010cSL [24]": "KDU-\u010cSL [24]", "KS\u010cM [8]": "KS\u010cM [8]", "N\u00e1S [31]": "N\u00e1S [31]", "OB\u010cAN\u00c9 2011 [16]": "OB\u010cAN\u00c9 2011 [16]", "ODA [14]": "ODA [14]", "ODS [1]": "ODS [1]", "PB [5]": "PB [5]", "Pir\u00e1ti [15]": "Pir\u00e1ti [15]", "REAL [26]": "REAL [26]", "Referendum o EU [19]": "Referendum o EU [19]", "Rozumn\u00ed [10]": "Rozumn\u00ed [10]", "R\u010c [6]": "R\u010c [6]", "SPD [29]": "SPD [29]", "SPDV [11]": "SPDV [11]", "SPO [30]": "SPO [30]", "SPORTOVCI [27]": "SPORTOVCI [27]", "SPRRS\u010c M_Sl\u00e1dka [23]": "SPRRS\u010c M_Sl\u00e1dka [23]", "STAN [7]": "STAN [7]", "Svobodn\u00ed [12]": "Svobodn\u00ed [12]", "TOP 09 [20]": "TOP 09 [20]", "Unie H_A_V_E_L_ [17]": "Unie H_A_V_E_L_ [17]", "Zelen\u00ed [9]": "Zelen\u00ed [9]", "\u010cNF [18]": "\u010cNF [18]", "\u010cSNS [25]": "\u010cSNS [25]", "\u010cSSD [4]": "\u010cSSD [4]", "\u0158N - VU [2]": "\u0158N - VU [2]"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14863, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-04T22:46:13.117500", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.612, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.632, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.726, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.612, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.632, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.323, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.57, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.643, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.503, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.626, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.21, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.21, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "SPO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "TOP 09", "margin": 2.74, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "CZE", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 14863}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "338ffd2b92ed4346b38c38f07401319a", "name": "Mexico 2021 local (overnight mexico_sinaloa_2021_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://siceen21.ine.mx/ACTASSICEEN2021/download/LOCALES/2021/SIN_PEL_2021.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"rocha_moya_morena_pas_cc": "rocha_moya_morena_pas_cc", "zamora_pan_pri_prd_coalition": "zamora_pan_pri_prd_coalition", "gamez_mc": "gamez_mc", "pt": "pt", "pvem": "pvem", "pes": "pes", "rsp": "rsp", "fxm": "fxm", "cand_no_reg": "cand_no_reg"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4986, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 35, "cast_valid_mismatch": 259, "registered_not_positive": 31, "votes_gt_valid": 259}, "n_stations_flagged": 289, "created_at": "2026-07-04T22:45:51.495587", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.624, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.534, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4986}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bea1fb4bd7c949698b7db0de6da048fd", "name": "Mexico 2021 local (overnight mexico_san_luis_potosi_2021_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://siceen21.ine.mx/ACTASSICEEN2021/download/LOCALES/2021/SLP_PEL_2021.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cand_va_por_slp_pan_pri_prd_pcp": "cand_va_por_slp_pan_pri_prd_pcp", "cand_gallardo_pt_pvem": "cand_gallardo_pt_pvem", "cand_pmc_mc": "cand_pmc_mc", "cand_morena": "cand_morena", "cand_naslp": "cand_naslp", "cand_pes": "cand_pes", "cand_rsp": "cand_rsp", "cand_fxm": "cand_fxm", "cand_ind1": "cand_ind1", "votos_no_registrados": "votos_no_registrados"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3753, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 1104, "cast_gt_registered": 28, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1104, "registered_not_positive": 25}, "n_stations_flagged": 1119, "created_at": "2026-07-04T22:45:33.900421", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.624, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.534, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3753}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "87116d1fb5bc4a83bf7279d3ef996cc0", "name": "Mexico 2021 local (overnight mexico_queretaro_2021_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.rel2021qro.ieeq.mx/assets/data/20210613_1000_REL_QRO.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"MAURICIO_KURI_GONZALEZ_PAN_QI": "MAURICIO_KURI_GONZALEZ_PAN_QI", "PRI": "PRI", "PRD": "PRD", "MC": "MC", "PVEM": "PVEM", "MORENA": "MORENA", "PT": "PT", "PES": "PES", "RSP": "RSP", "FM": "FM"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2854, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 479, "registered_not_positive": 23, "cast_gt_registered": 27}, "n_stations_flagged": 500, "created_at": "2026-07-04T22:45:19.813219", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.624, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.534, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2854}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2412a310a0dd439b8ec6d132d2009beb", "name": "Mexico 2021 local (overnight mexico_zacatecas_2021_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://siceen21.ine.mx/ACTASSICEEN2021/download/LOCALES/2021/ZAC_PEL_2021.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"VA_POR_ZACATECAS_PAN_PRI_PRD": "VA_POR_ZACATECAS_PAN_PRI_PRD", "JUNTOS_HAREMOS_HISTORIA_PT_PVEM_MORENA_PANALZ": "JUNTOS_HAREMOS_HISTORIA_PT_PVEM_MORENA_PANALZ", "MC": "MC", "PAZ": "PAZ", "MDZ": "MDZ", "PP": "PP", "PES": "PES", "RSP": "RSP", "FXM": "FXM", "CAND_NO_REGISTRADO": "CAND_NO_REGISTRADO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2578, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 227, "registered_not_positive": 20, "cast_gt_registered": 20, "votes_gt_valid": 227}, "n_stations_flagged": 245, "created_at": "2026-07-04T22:45:08.143385", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.624, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.534, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2578}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "87d867d0a8ab43e8a7f8b979c881cad7", "name": "Mexico 2021 local (overnight mexico_nayarit_2021_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://siceen21.ine.mx/ACTASSICEEN2021/download/LOCALES/2021/NAY_PEL_2021.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"VaPorNayarit_PAN_PRI_PRD": "VaPorNayarit_PAN_PRI_PRD", "JHH_Navarro_PT_PVEM_MORENA_NAN": "JHH_Navarro_PT_PVEM_MORENA_NAN", "MC": "MC", "PES": "PES", "RSP": "RSP", "FXM": "FXM", "VIVA": "VIVA", "MLN": "MLN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1735, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 11, "cast_valid_mismatch": 108, "cast_gt_registered": 11}, "n_stations_flagged": 120, "created_at": "2026-07-04T22:45:00.060389", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.624, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.534, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1735}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dfd92c22b2c94785a6dffa8d1a74e95e", "name": "Mexico 2021 local (overnight mexico_campeche_2021_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://siceen21.ine.mx/ACTASSICEEN2021/download/LOCALES/2021/CAMP_PEL_2021.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PAN_PRI_PRD": "PAN_PRI_PRD", "PT_MORENA": "PT_MORENA", "PVEM": "PVEM", "MC": "MC", "PES": "PES", "RSP": "RSP", "FXM": "FXM", "votos_candidato_no_registrado": "votos_candidato_no_registrado"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1190, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 51, "registered_not_positive": 10, "cast_gt_registered": 11, "votes_gt_valid": 51}, "n_stations_flagged": 62, "created_at": "2026-07-04T22:44:53.250398", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.624, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.534, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1190}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "04e5f498fe4b4af49db8bdd546c5365f", "name": "Mexico 2021 local (overnight mexico_colima_2021_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://siceen21.ine.mx/ACTASSICEEN2021/download/LOCALES/2021/COL_PEL_2021.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Mely_Romero_Celis_PAN_PRI_PRD": "Mely_Romero_Celis_PAN_PRI_PRD", "Virgilio_Mendoza_Amezcua_PVEM": "Virgilio_Mendoza_Amezcua_PVEM", "Aurora_Cruz_Alcaraz_PT": "Aurora_Cruz_Alcaraz_PT", "Leoncio_Moran_Sanchez_MC": "Leoncio_Moran_Sanchez_MC", "Indira_Vizcaino_Silva_MORENA_PNA": "Indira_Vizcaino_Silva_MORENA_PNA", "Evangelina_Banuelos_RSP": "Evangelina_Banuelos_RSP", "Claudia_Yanez_FXM": "Claudia_Yanez_FXM", "candidato_no_registrado": "candidato_no_registrado"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 980, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 415, "cast_valid_mismatch": 415, "registered_not_positive": 8, "cast_gt_registered": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 423, "created_at": "2026-07-04T22:44:47.333704", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.624, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.534, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 980}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5e0c74a6c61a4d13a9b3491f7442be21", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_cundinamarca_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://resultadosprec2023.registraduria.gov.co/json/ACT/GO/{code}.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"JORGE EMILIO REY ANGEL": "JORGE EMILIO REY ANGEL", "NANCY PATRICIA GUTIERREZ CASTA\u00d1EDA": "NANCY PATRICIA GUTIERREZ CASTA\u00d1EDA", "YORLY LILIANA GARCIA BUSTAMANTE": "YORLY LILIANA GARCIA BUSTAMANTE", "ALFREDO GUILLERMO MOLINA TRIANA": "ALFREDO GUILLERMO MOLINA TRIANA", "JORGE HERNANDO LOZANO LARA": "JORGE HERNANDO LOZANO LARA", "RICARDO LOPEZ AREVALO": "RICARDO LOPEZ AREVALO", "YEILOR RAFAEL ESPINEL TORRES": "YEILOR RAFAEL ESPINEL TORRES", "ORLANDO SALCEDO MOYA": "ORLANDO SALCEDO MOYA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 602, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 9, "cast_valid_mismatch": 595}, "n_stations_flagged": 598, "created_at": "2026-07-04T22:44:43.597060", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 602}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3f1cd420a3af4041a9e0acf18b9b1e4c", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_atlantico_2023_gobernador.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://resultadosprec2023.registraduria.gov.co/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"mesas_reported": "mesas_reported", "mesas_total": "mesas_total", "RAYMUNDO FRANCISCO MARENCO BOEKHOUDT": "RAYMUNDO FRANCISCO MARENCO BOEKHOUDT", "ALFREDO ESTEBAN VARELA DE LA ROSA": "ALFREDO ESTEBAN VARELA DE LA ROSA", "EDGAR ENRIQUE PALACIO MIZRAHI": "EDGAR ENRIQUE PALACIO MIZRAHI", "JUAN JOSE ACUNA COLPAS": "JUAN JOSE ACUNA COLPAS", "EDUARDO IGNACIO VERANO DE LA ROSA": "EDUARDO IGNACIO VERANO DE LA ROSA", "CLAUDIA VERONICA PATINO JACOME": "CLAUDIA VERONICA PATINO JACOME"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 329, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 328, "votes_gt_valid": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 328, "created_at": "2026-07-04T22:44:40.259589", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 329}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "41601432aff641a1bb9d752d224c3e8c", "name": "Poland 2010 presidential (overnight poland_2010_r2_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 2010, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"KACZY\u0143SKI Jaros\u0142aw Aleksander": "KACZY\u0143SKI Jaros\u0142aw Aleksander", "KOMOROWSKI Bronis\u0142aw Maria": "KOMOROWSKI Bronis\u0142aw Maria"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 25773, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-04T22:09:14.396839", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.92, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.939, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.892, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.827, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.685, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.402, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.601, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.795, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.086, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.086, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.971, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Civic Platform", "winner_candidate": "B. Komorowski", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Law and Justice (PIS)", "margin": 6.02, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "POL", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 25773}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "43c4292488844d9480af87857c2ed7ae", "name": "South Korea 2017 presidential (overnight southkorea_2017_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 2017, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "http://data.nec.go.kr/open-data/file.do?dataId=8 (attachFileId=5)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_moon_jaein": "votes_moon_jaein", "votes_hong_junpyo": "votes_hong_junpyo", "votes_ahn_cheolsoo": "votes_ahn_cheolsoo", "votes_yoo_seongmin": "votes_yoo_seongmin", "votes_sim_sangjung": "votes_sim_sangjung", "votes_cho_wonjin": "votes_cho_wonjin", "votes_oh_yeongguk": "votes_oh_yeongguk", "votes_jang_seongmin": "votes_jang_seongmin", "votes_lee_jaeoh": "votes_lee_jaeoh", "votes_kim_seondong": "votes_kim_seondong", "votes_lee_kyunghee": "votes_lee_kyunghee", "votes_yoon_hongsik": "votes_yoon_hongsik", "votes_kim_minchan": "votes_kim_minchan"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18259, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 64, "registered_not_positive": 54}, "n_stations_flagged": 64, "created_at": "2026-07-04T22:08:06.206290", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.908, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.939, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.852, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.791, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.625, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.178, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.044, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.791, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.735, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.134, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18259}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5a5324486f2f46d09a0b7a1b3f0b07e7", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_valle_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://observatorio.registraduria.gov.co/comprimidos/MMV_TERRITORIALES2023_VALLE.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Tulio Alberto Gomez Giraldo": "Tulio Alberto Gomez Giraldo", "Santiago Castro Gomez": "Santiago Castro Gomez", "William Andres Cruz Sanchez": "William Andres Cruz Sanchez", "Luis Fernando Velazquez Bueno": "Luis Fernando Velazquez Bueno", "Oscar Gamboa Zuniga": "Oscar Gamboa Zuniga", "Dilian Francisca Toro Torres": "Dilian Francisca Toro Torres", "Ferney Humberto Lozano Camelo": "Ferney Humberto Lozano Camelo", "Votos en Blanco": "Votos en Blanco"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11378, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 11376, "registered_not_positive": 11378}, "n_stations_flagged": 11378, "created_at": "2026-07-04T22:07:21.178157", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 11378}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d1a2a42dcddf4e3fbf2af5aa7f413a1d", "name": "Uruguay 2019 presidential (overnight uruguay_2019_balotaje.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Uruguay", "year": 2019, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://catalogodatos.gub.uy/dataset/corte-electoral-balotaje_2019", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Martinez_Villar_FrenteAmplio": "Martinez_Villar_FrenteAmplio", "LacallePou_Argimon_PartidoNacional": "LacallePou_Argimon_PartidoNacional"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7220, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 7218, "registered_not_positive": 4, "cast_gt_registered": 115}, "n_stations_flagged": 7218, "created_at": "2026-07-04T22:06:53.170183", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.897, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.937, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.836, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.937, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.97, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.993, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.734, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.57, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.642, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.042, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.042, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7220}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e6ead1ddb0344d60b5aaa5b558a07615", "name": "Mexico 2021 local (overnight mexico_michoacan_2021_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votos_can_nreg": "votos_can_nreg", "PAN": "PAN", "PRI": "PRI", "PRD": "PRD", "PT": "PT", "PVEM": "PVEM", "MC": "MC", "MORENA": "MORENA", "PES": "PES", "RSP": "RSP", "FXM": "FXM", "PT_MORENA": "PT_MORENA", "PAN_PRI_PRD": "PAN_PRI_PRD", "PAN_PRI": "PAN_PRI", "PAN_PRD": "PAN_PRD", "PRI_PRD": "PRI_PRD"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6171, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 50, "registered_not_positive": 51, "cast_valid_mismatch": 599, "votes_gt_valid": 599}, "n_stations_flagged": 637, "created_at": "2026-07-04T22:06:28.811277", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.624, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.534, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6171}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "80aa3f0cab024a609f6c096d4beac711", "name": "Slovakia 2016 parliamentary (overnight slovakia_nrsr_2016.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Slovakia", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://volby.statistics.sk/nrsr/nrsr2016/sk/download.html", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_smer_socialna_demokracia": "votes_smer_socialna_demokracia", "votes_sloboda_a_solidarita": "votes_sloboda_a_solidarita", "votes_obycajni_ludia_a_nezavisle_osobnosti_olano_nova": "votes_obycajni_ludia_a_nezavisle_osobnosti_olano_nova", "votes_slovenska_narodna_strana": "votes_slovenska_narodna_strana", "votes_kotleba_ludova_strana_nase_slovensko": "votes_kotleba_ludova_strana_nase_slovensko", "votes_sme_rodina_boris_kollar": "votes_sme_rodina_boris_kollar", "votes_most_hid": "votes_most_hid", "votes_siet": "votes_siet", "votes_krestanskodemokraticke_hnutie": "votes_krestanskodemokraticke_hnutie", "votes_strana_madarskej_komunity_magyar_kozosseg_partja": "votes_strana_madarskej_komunity_magyar_kozosseg_partja", "votes_slovenska_obcianska_koalicia": "votes_slovenska_obcianska_koalicia", "votes_strana_tip": "votes_strana_tip", "votes_strana_zelenych_slovenska": "votes_strana_zelenych_slovenska", "votes_komunisticka_strana_slovenska": "votes_komunisticka_strana_slovenska", "votes_slovenska_demokraticka_a_krestanska_unia_demokraticka_strana": "votes_slovenska_demokraticka_a_krestanska_unia_demokraticka_strana", "votes_sanca": "votes_sanca", "votes_strana_moderneho_slovenska_sms": "votes_strana_moderneho_slovenska_sms", "votes_priama_demokracia": "votes_priama_demokracia", "votes_odvaha_velka_narodna_a_proruska_koalicia": "votes_odvaha_velka_narodna_a_proruska_koalicia", "votes_vzdor_strana_prace": "votes_vzdor_strana_prace", "votes_madarska_krestanskodemokraticka_aliancia_magyar_keresztenydemokrata_szovetseg": "votes_madarska_krestanskodemokraticka_aliancia_magyar_keresztenydemokrata_szovetseg", "votes_demokrati_slovenska_ludo_kanik": "votes_demokrati_slovenska_ludo_kanik", "votes_koalicia_spolocne_za_slovensko": "votes_koalicia_spolocne_za_slovensko"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5992, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-04T22:06:03.770927", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.909, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.837, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.726, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.615, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.611, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.668, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.286, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.286, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 5992}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9067895925ae4e07a71f4a173689a665", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_cali_2023_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://observatorio.registraduria.gov.co/comprimidos/MMV_TERRITORIALES2023_VALLE.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votos_no_marcados": "votos_no_marcados", "wilfredo_pardo_herrera": "wilfredo_pardo_herrera", "alvaro_alejandro_eder_garces": "alvaro_alejandro_eder_garces", "wilson_ruiz_orejuela": "wilson_ruiz_orejuela", "diana_carolina_rojas_atehortua": "diana_carolina_rojas_atehortua", "miyerlandi_torres_agredo": "miyerlandi_torres_agredo", "edilson_huerfano_ordoaez": "edilson_huerfano_ordoaez", "roberto_ortiz_urueaa": "roberto_ortiz_urueaa", "heriberto_escobar_gonzalez": "heriberto_escobar_gonzalez", "danis_antonio_renteria_chala": "danis_antonio_renteria_chala", "deninson_mendoza_ramos": "deninson_mendoza_ramos"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5351, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 5351, "registered_not_positive": 5351, "votes_gt_valid": 547}, "n_stations_flagged": 5351, "created_at": "2026-07-04T22:05:43.192497", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 5351}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fb3579e6c397486da8de5245846743ec", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_medellin_2023_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://observatorio.registraduria.gov.co/comprimidos/MMV_TERRITORIALES2023_ANTIOQUIA.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"FEDERICO_GUTIERREZ_ZULUAGA_CREEMOS": "FEDERICO_GUTIERREZ_ZULUAGA_CREEMOS", "JUAN_DAVID_VALDERRAMA_LOPEZ": "JUAN_DAVID_VALDERRAMA_LOPEZ", "JAIME_ALBERTO_MEJIA_ALVARAN": "JAIME_ALBERTO_MEJIA_ALVARAN", "RODOLFO_ANDRES_CORREA_VARGAS": "RODOLFO_ANDRES_CORREA_VARGAS", "LUIS_BERNARDO_VELEZ_MONTOYA": "LUIS_BERNARDO_VELEZ_MONTOYA", "JUAN_CAMILO_RESTREPO_GOMEZ": "JUAN_CAMILO_RESTREPO_GOMEZ", "DEICY_ELENA_BERMUDEZ_HURTADO": "DEICY_ELENA_BERMUDEZ_HURTADO", "FELIPE_VELEZ_ROA": "FELIPE_VELEZ_ROA", "LILIANA_MARIA_RENDON_ROLDAN": "LILIANA_MARIA_RENDON_ROLDAN", "ALBERT_YORDANO_CORREDOR_BUSTAMANTE": "ALBERT_YORDANO_CORREDOR_BUSTAMANTE", "MARIA_PAULINA_AGUINAGA_LEZCANO": "MARIA_PAULINA_AGUINAGA_LEZCANO", "JUAN_CARLOS_UPEGUI_VANEGAS": "JUAN_CARLOS_UPEGUI_VANEGAS", "CARLOS_ALBERTO_BALLESTEROS_BARON": "CARLOS_ALBERTO_BALLESTEROS_BARON", "GILBERTO_TOBON_SANIN": "GILBERTO_TOBON_SANIN", "votos_no_marcados": "votos_no_marcados"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5335, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 623, "cast_gt_registered": 5335, "registered_not_positive": 5335}, "n_stations_flagged": 5335, "created_at": "2026-07-04T22:05:11.955678", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 5335}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2868a13de91b4b2594370e7e99c01bd9", "name": "Mexico 2021 local (overnight mexico_baja_california_2021_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://siceen21.ine.mx/ACTASSICEEN2021/download/LOCALES/2021/BC_PEL_2021.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votos_nreg": "votos_nreg", "coal_va_por_bc_PAN_PRI_PRD": "coal_va_por_bc_PAN_PRI_PRD", "coal_juntos_haremos_historia_PT_PVEM_MORENA": "coal_juntos_haremos_historia_PT_PVEM_MORENA", "MC": "MC", "PES": "PES", "RSP": "RSP", "FXM": "FXM", "PBC": "PBC"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4967, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 771, "cast_valid_mismatch": 771, "registered_not_positive": 37, "cast_gt_registered": 39}, "n_stations_flagged": 799, "created_at": "2026-07-04T22:04:44.190779", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.624, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.534, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4967}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1dac30603fc04ccf8a7d4081d10c97ee", "name": "Mexico 2021 local (overnight mexico_sonora_2021_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://siceen21.ine.mx/ACTASSICEEN2021/download/LOCALES/2021/SON_PEL_2021.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"MC": "MC", "PES": "PES", "RSP": "RSP", "FXM": "FXM", "CAND_COM_PAN_PRI_PRD": "CAND_COM_PAN_PRI_PRD", "CAND_COM_MORENA_PT_PVEM_NAS": "CAND_COM_MORENA_PT_PVEM_NAS", "votos_candidato_no_registrado": "votos_candidato_no_registrado"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3748, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 547, "cast_gt_registered": 34, "cast_valid_mismatch": 547, "registered_not_positive": 25}, "n_stations_flagged": 573, "created_at": "2026-07-04T22:04:30.506745", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.624, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.534, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3748}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "71bc4c842a2642429910e667769e172d", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_santander_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://resultadosprec2023.registraduria.gov.co/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"mesas": "mesas", "cand_JUVENAL_DIAZ_MATEUS": "cand_JUVENAL_DIAZ_MATEUS", "cand_HECTOR_GUILLERMO_MANTILLA_RUEDA": "cand_HECTOR_GUILLERMO_MANTILLA_RUEDA", "cand_LUIS_FERLEY_SIERRA_JAIMES": "cand_LUIS_FERLEY_SIERRA_JAIMES", "cand_RODOLFO_HERNANDEZ_SUAREZ": "cand_RODOLFO_HERNANDEZ_SUAREZ", "cand_JOSE_DOMINGO_CORTES_TORRES": "cand_JOSE_DOMINGO_CORTES_TORRES", "cand_JULIAN_FERNANDO_SILVA_CALA": "cand_JULIAN_FERNANDO_SILVA_CALA", "cand_LUIS_ALFREDO_RANGEL_VILLARREAL": "cand_LUIS_ALFREDO_RANGEL_VILLARREAL", "cand_LUIS_MAURICIO_QUINONES_AMAYA": "cand_LUIS_MAURICIO_QUINONES_AMAYA", "cand_JUAN_TORRES_ORTEGA": "cand_JUAN_TORRES_ORTEGA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 818, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 22, "cast_valid_mismatch": 806, "cast_gt_registered": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 808, "created_at": "2026-07-04T22:04:26.179225", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 818}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a577e57b5cb04b549ce5c8edafaa8002", "name": "Poland 2015 presidential (overnight poland_2015_r2_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 2015, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://prezydent2015.pkw.gov.pl/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Andrzej_Sebastian_Duda": "Andrzej_Sebastian_Duda", "Bronis\u0142aw_Maria_Komorowski": "Bronis\u0142aw_Maria_Komorowski"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 27817, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 4549}, "n_stations_flagged": 4549, "created_at": "2026-07-04T21:20:59.188510", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.904, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.961, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.876, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.775, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.961, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.826, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.602, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.335, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.876, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.786, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.074, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.074, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Law and Justice (PIS)", "winner_candidate": "A. Duda", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 3.1, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "POL", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 27817}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0b12a42822c4421eb58be4182ed358d4", "name": "Mexico 2023 local (overnight mexico_edomex_gobernatura_2023.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.ieem.org.mx/assets/docs/procesos-electorales/resultados/2023/TABLAS%20RESULTADOS%20GUBERNATURA%202023.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CAND_Delfina_Gomez_MORENA_PT_PVEM": "CAND_Delfina_Gomez_MORENA_PT_PVEM", "CAND_Alejandra_DelMoral_PAN_PRI_PRD_NAEM": "CAND_Alejandra_DelMoral_PAN_PRI_PRD_NAEM"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20446, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 4182, "registered_not_positive": 62, "cast_gt_registered": 68}, "n_stations_flagged": 4221, "created_at": "2026-07-04T21:19:42.969086", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.548, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.302, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.079, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.037, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.548, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.302, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.302, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.295, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.668, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.663, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.663, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 20446}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2d9861b7dc8a48b3b0977bdf33af9ede", "name": "South Korea 2022 presidential (overnight southkorea_2022_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 2022, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "http://data.nec.go.kr/open-data/file.do?dataId=8 (attachFileId=6)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_lee_jaemyung": "votes_lee_jaemyung", "votes_yoon_sukyeol": "votes_yoon_sukyeol", "votes_sim_sangjung": "votes_sim_sangjung", "votes_oh_junho": "votes_oh_junho", "votes_huh_kyungyoung": "votes_huh_kyungyoung", "votes_lee_baekyun": "votes_lee_baekyun", "votes_ok_eunho": "votes_ok_eunho", "votes_kim_kyungjae": "votes_kim_kyungjae", "votes_cho_wonjin": "votes_cho_wonjin", "votes_kim_jaeyeon": "votes_kim_jaeyeon", "votes_lee_kyunghee": "votes_lee_kyunghee", "votes_kim_minchan": "votes_kim_minchan"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18725, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 71, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 71, "created_at": "2026-07-04T21:18:32.138532", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.896, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.933, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.802, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.718, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.79, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.301, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.21, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.052, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.718, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.718, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.696, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.905, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.124, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.124, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18725}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6e1d5ff43697493d85f25e58002175b1", "name": "Czechia 2021 parliamentary (overnight czech_2021_ps_per_okrsek.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.volby.cz/opendata/ps2021/ps2021_opendata.htm", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ANO [20]": "ANO [20]", "ANS [7]": "ANS [7]", "APB [9]": "APB [9]", "KS\u010cM [18]": "KS\u010cM [18]", "Levice [11]": "Levice [11]", "MZH [19]": "MZH [19]", "Monarchiste_cz [16]": "Monarchiste_cz [16]", "Moravan\u00e9 [22]": "Moravan\u00e9 [22]", "Nevolte Urza_cz [15]": "Nevolte Urza_cz [15]", "Ot\u010ce [21]": "Ot\u010ce [21]", "PB [6]": "PB [6]", "PRAMENY [10]": "PRAMENY [10]", "Pir\u00e1ti+STAN [17]": "Pir\u00e1ti+STAN [17]", "P\u0158\u00cdSAHA [12]": "P\u0158\u00cdSAHA [12]", "SENIO\u0158I [14]": "SENIO\u0158I [14]", "SPD [4]": "SPD [4]", "SPOLU [13]": "SPOLU [13]", "TSS [8]": "TSS [8]", "Voln\u00fd blok [3]": "Voln\u00fd blok [3]", "Zelen\u00ed [1]": "Zelen\u00ed [1]", "\u010cSSD [5]": "\u010cSSD [5]", "\u0160v\u00fdcar_ demokr_ [2]": "\u0160v\u00fdcar_ demokr_ [2]"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14886, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-07-04T21:17:36.115228", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.818, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.874, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.789, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.698, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.874, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.63, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.657, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.698, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.698, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.164, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.164, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 14886}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3afad0f8663b43299b6fb48f02328391", "name": "Uruguay 2024 presidential (overnight uruguay_2024_balotaje.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Uruguay", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://catalogodatos.gub.uy/dataset/corte-electoral-balotaje_2024", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"crv": "crv", "observed": "observed", "Orsi_Cosse_FrenteAmplio": "Orsi_Cosse_FrenteAmplio", "Delgado_Ripoll_PartidoNacional": "Delgado_Ripoll_PartidoNacional"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7348, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 7348, "cast_gt_registered": 219, "cast_valid_mismatch": 7347, "registered_not_positive": 123}, "n_stations_flagged": 7348, "created_at": "2026-07-04T21:16:41.418675", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.862, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.768, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.862, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.183, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.546, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7348}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bc92b4ce4c144e7eb8698f0e01a7c3cf", "name": "Mexico 2023 local (overnight coahuila_2023_gub_casilla.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://iec.org.mx/v1/images/proceso2023/computos_finales/Gubernatura2023_X_Casilla.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pan": "pan", "pri": "pri", "prd": "prd", "pvem": "pvem", "pt": "pt", "udc": "udc", "mc": "mc", "morena": "morena", "cand_ind1": "cand_ind1", "PAN_PRI_PRD": "PAN_PRI_PRD", "PAN_PRI": "PAN_PRI", "PAN_PRD": "PAN_PRD", "PRI_PRD": "PRI_PRD", "PVEM_UDC": "PVEM_UDC", "cand_nreg": "cand_nreg"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4050, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 18, "cast_gt_registered": 26}, "n_stations_flagged": 26, "created_at": "2026-07-04T21:16:26.853876", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.548, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.302, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.079, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.037, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.548, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.302, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.302, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.295, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.668, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.663, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.663, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4050}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ec6dca2c3afe48d49f698ca5088c9466", "name": "Mexico 2022 local (overnight mexico_hidalgo_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://siceen21.ine.mx/ACTASSICEEN2021/download/LOCALES/2022/HGO_PEL_2022.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PVEM": "PVEM", "MC": "MC", "PAN_PRI_PRD": "PAN_PRI_PRD", "PT_MORENA_PANALH": "PT_MORENA_PANALH", "votos_candidato_no_registrado": "votos_candidato_no_registrado"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3978, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 401, "registered_not_positive": 18, "cast_gt_registered": 18, "votes_gt_valid": 401}, "n_stations_flagged": 415, "created_at": "2026-07-04T21:16:11.964384", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.584, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.33, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.223, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.584, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.33, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.666, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.498, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.498, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.546, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.546, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.701, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3978}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d8b078e3720849c7b2efc0560b78baca", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_antioquia_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://resultadosprec2023.registraduria.gov.co/json/ACT/GO/{puesto_code}.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"LUIS EMILIO PEREZ GUTIERREZ": "LUIS EMILIO PEREZ GUTIERREZ", "ANDRES JULIAN RENDON CARDONA": "ANDRES JULIAN RENDON CARDONA", "ESTEBAN RESTREPO TABORDA": "ESTEBAN RESTREPO TABORDA", "LUIS FERNANDO SUAREZ VELEZ": "LUIS FERNANDO SUAREZ VELEZ", "MAURICIO TOBON FRANCO": "MAURICIO TOBON FRANCO", "JUAN DIEGO GOMEZ JIMENEZ": "JUAN DIEGO GOMEZ JIMENEZ", "JULIAN BEDOYA PULGARIN": "JULIAN BEDOYA PULGARIN", "CRISTIAN HALABY FERNANDEZ": "CRISTIAN HALABY FERNANDEZ", "JORGE ALBERTO GOMEZ GALLEGO": "JORGE ALBERTO GOMEZ GALLEGO", "ROBINSON ALONSO GIRALDO MIRA": "ROBINSON ALONSO GIRALDO MIRA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1202, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 3, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1177}, "n_stations_flagged": 1178, "created_at": "2026-07-04T21:16:06.166233", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1202}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "81e1424ba91c4a8a853e1427f78e90ef", "name": "Poland 2015 parliamentary (overnight poland_2015_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://parlament2015.pkw.gov.pl/wyniki_zb/2015-gl-lis-obw.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"obwod_nr": "obwod_nr", "KW Prawo i Sprawiedliwo\u015b\u0107": "KW Prawo i Sprawiedliwo\u015b\u0107", "KW Platforma Obywatelska RP": "KW Platforma Obywatelska RP", "KW Partia Razem": "KW Partia Razem", "KW KORWiN": "KW KORWiN", "KW Polskie Stronnictwo Ludowe": "KW Polskie Stronnictwo Ludowe", "Zjednoczona Lewica SLD+TR+PPS+UP+Zieloni": "Zjednoczona Lewica SLD+TR+PPS+UP+Zieloni", "KWW \u201eKukiz'15": "KWW \u201eKukiz'15", "KW Nowoczesna Ryszarda Petru": "KW Nowoczesna Ryszarda Petru", "KWW JOW Bezpartyjni": "KWW JOW Bezpartyjni", "KWW Zbigniewa Stonogi": "KWW Zbigniewa Stonogi", "KWW Ruch Spo\u0142eczny Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej": "KWW Ruch Spo\u0142eczny Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej", "KWW Zjednoczeni dla \u015al\u0105ska": "KWW Zjednoczeni dla \u015al\u0105ska", "KW Samoobrona": "KW Samoobrona", "KWW Grzegorza Brauna \u201eSzcz\u0119\u015b\u0107 Bo\u017ce!": "KWW Grzegorza Brauna \u201eSzcz\u0119\u015b\u0107 Bo\u017ce!", "KW Kongres Nowej Prawicy": "KW Kongres Nowej Prawicy", "KWW Mniejszo\u015b\u0107 Niemiecka": "KWW Mniejszo\u015b\u0107 Niemiecka", "KWW Obywatele do Parlamentu": "KWW Obywatele do Parlamentu"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 27859, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 27859}, "n_stations_flagged": 27859, "created_at": "2026-07-03T11:49:33.254940", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.904, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.961, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.876, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.775, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.961, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.826, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.602, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.335, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.876, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.786, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.074, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.074, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Law and Justice (PIS)", "winner_candidate": "A. Duda", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 3.1, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "POL", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 27859}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fc7c1ac7385b4087b513303c7f2bdcc3", "name": "Colombia 2023 local (overnight colombia_bogota_2023_mayor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://observatorio.registraduria.gov.co/comprimidos/MMV_TERRITORIALES2023_BOGOT%C3%81.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votos_no_marcados": "votos_no_marcados", "votes_carlos_fernando_galan_pachon": "votes_carlos_fernando_galan_pachon", "votes_diego_andres_molano_aponte": "votes_diego_andres_molano_aponte", "votes_gustavo_bolivar_moreno": "votes_gustavo_bolivar_moreno", "votes_jorge_enrique_robledo_castillo": "votes_jorge_enrique_robledo_castillo", "votes_jorge_luis_vargas_valencia": "votes_jorge_luis_vargas_valencia", "votes_juan_daniel_oviedo_arango": "votes_juan_daniel_oviedo_arango", "votes_nicolas_ramos_barbosa": "votes_nicolas_ramos_barbosa", "votes_rafael_alfonso_quintero_mora": "votes_rafael_alfonso_quintero_mora", "votes_rodrigo_lara_restrepo": "votes_rodrigo_lara_restrepo"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17789, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 1134, "registered_not_positive": 17789, "cast_gt_registered": 17788}, "n_stations_flagged": 17789, "created_at": "2026-07-03T11:46:50.307310", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.711, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17789}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "28b13b8c25244e2c979fdad59a4c6b05", "name": "Mexico 2022 local (overnight mx_oaxaca_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.ieepco.org.mx/computo_guber2022/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"jara_morena_pt_pvem_pup": "jara_morena_pt_pvem_pup", "aviles_pri_prd": "aviles_pri_prd", "diaz_pan": "diaz_pan", "garcia_morlan_mc": "garcia_morlan_mc", "nao": "nao", "ind_mauricio_cruz": "ind_mauricio_cruz", "ind_jesus": "ind_jesus"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5660, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 55, "cast_valid_mismatch": 636, "registered_not_positive": 55}, "n_stations_flagged": 666, "created_at": "2026-07-03T11:45:41.587622", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.584, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.33, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.223, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.584, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.33, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.666, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.498, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.498, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.546, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.546, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.701, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 5660}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0f451461e37540828e73bd1b50fec1f1", "name": "Mexico 2022 local (overnight mexico_tamaulipas_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ietam.org.mx/PortalN/Paginas/EstadisticaEl/Estadistica_Electoral.aspx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PAN": "PAN", "PRI": "PRI", "PRD": "PRD", "MORENA_PT_PVEM": "MORENA_PT_PVEM", "MC": "MC", "PAN_PRI_PRD": "PAN_PRI_PRD", "PAN_PRI": "PAN_PRI", "PAN_PRD": "PAN_PRD", "PRI_PRD": "PRI_PRD"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4771, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 34, "registered_not_positive": 32}, "n_stations_flagged": 34, "created_at": "2026-07-03T11:45:01.635094", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.584, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.33, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.223, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.584, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.33, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.666, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.498, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.498, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.546, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.546, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.701, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4771}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fd6e28e3361e483aa8ccda8617a6ffe7", "name": "Slovenia 2018 parliamentary (overnight slovenia_dz_2018.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Slovenia", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://podatki.gov.si/dataset/volitve-v-drzavni-zbor (resource 4766609e-940b-43eb-9537-42d4f4f6d8d4, file izidvolitevvoliaposloveniji3.6.2018.xlsx)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ZELENI": "ZELENI", "DeSUS": "DeSUS", "DD": "DD", "GAS": "GAS", "Zsi": "Zsi", "GSN": "GSN", "ZDRU\u017dENA DESNICA": "ZDRU\u017dENA DESNICA", "LEVICA": "LEVICA", "LM\u0160": "LM\u0160", "LNBP": "LNBP", "NPS": "NPS", "NSi": "NSi", "PIRATI": "PIRATI", "ReSET": "ReSET", "SDS": "SDS", "SLS": "SLS", "SNS": "SNS", "SMC": "SMC", "SPS": "SPS", "SD": "SD", "SOLIDARNOST": "SOLIDARNOST", "SSN": "SSN", "STRANKA AB": "STRANKA AB", "ZD": "ZD", "ZDRU\u017dENA LEVICA": "ZDRU\u017dENA LEVICA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3278, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 177, "cast_valid_mismatch": 44, "cast_gt_registered": 97}, "n_stations_flagged": 218, "created_at": "2026-07-03T11:44:26.137268", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.65, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.783, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.83, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.759, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.002, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.151, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.894, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.09, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.09, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Social Democrats (SD) (formally Independent)", "winner_candidate": "Borut Pahor", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "List of Marjan \u0160arec (LMS)", "margin": 6.18, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "SVN", "year": 2017, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3278}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2bb71a32dd94407f87853c8d6e152f12", "name": "Slovenia 2022 presidential (overnight slovenia_2022_presidential_r1.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Slovenia", "year": 2022, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.dvk-rs.si/arhivi/volitve2022/vp2022/data/prvikrog/ (DVK-RS official archive of volitve.gov.si/vp2022; 88x volisca_{VE}_{OK}.json + rezultati.json/udelezba.json)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"BRGLEZ": "BRGLEZ", "LOGAR": "LOGAR", "CIGLER_KRALJ": "CIGLER_KRALJ", "KORDIS": "KORDIS", "PIRC_MUSAR": "PIRC_MUSAR", "PREBILIC": "PREBILIC", "SENCAR": "SENCAR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3095, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 96, "cast_gt_registered": 96}, "n_stations_flagged": 96, "created_at": "2026-07-03T11:44:03.308578", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.839, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.914, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.808, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.728, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.839, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.722, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.112, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.548, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.744, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.705, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.705, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.928, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.095, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.095, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3095}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0b8c2d08863c45b6a499c03b5a54f45b", "name": "Mexico 2022 local (overnight mexico_quintana_roo_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cand_lezama_jhh": "cand_lezama_jhh", "cand_fernandez_vpq": "cand_fernandez_vpq", "cand_pech_mc": "cand_pech_mc", "cand_hendricks_pri": "cand_hendricks_pri", "cand_mena_mas": "cand_mena_mas"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2297, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 24, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1720, "registered_not_positive": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 1732, "created_at": "2026-07-03T11:43:44.352855", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.584, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.33, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.223, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.584, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.33, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.666, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.498, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.498, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.546, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.546, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.701, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2297}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a840fe7ce356474aaecbf8a923cef10c", "name": "Mexico 2022 local (overnight mexico_aguascalientes_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://siceen21.ine.mx/ACTASSICEEN2021/download/LOCALES/2022/AGS_PEL_2022.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votos_candidato_no_registrado": "votos_candidato_no_registrado", "PAN": "PAN", "PRI": "PRI", "PRD": "PRD", "PVEM": "PVEM", "PT": "PT", "MC": "MC", "MORENA": "MORENA", "FXMA": "FXMA", "PAN_PRI_PRD": "PAN_PRI_PRD", "PAN_PRI": "PAN_PRI", "PAN_PRD": "PAN_PRD", "PRI_PRD": "PRI_PRD", "PVEM_PT": "PVEM_PT"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1740, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 7, "cast_valid_mismatch": 209, "registered_not_positive": 7, "votes_gt_valid": 209}, "n_stations_flagged": 215, "created_at": "2026-07-03T11:43:37.069253", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.584, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.33, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.223, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.584, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.33, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.666, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.498, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.498, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.546, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.546, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.701, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1740}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "23132472ad6b4a1aaddb60a5b09955f9", "name": "United Kingdom 2022 local (overnight scotland_aberdeen_dundee_2022_stv.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/mggg/scot-elex", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ward_num": "ward_num", "n_candidates": "n_candidates", "n_seats": "n_seats", "fp_Gill_Al_Samarai_SNP": "fp_Gill_Al_Samarai_SNP", "fp_William_Ball_Gr": "fp_William_Ball_Gr", "fp_Barney_Crockett_Lab": "fp_Barney_Crockett_Lab", "fp_Peter_John_Heald_LD": "fp_Peter_John_Heald_LD", "fp_Neil_Macgregor_SNP": "fp_Neil_Macgregor_SNP", "fp_Avril_Mackenzie_Con": "fp_Avril_Mackenzie_Con", "fp_Braiden_Smith_Con": "fp_Braiden_Smith_Con", "fp_Amy_Marie_Stratton_SFP": "fp_Amy_Marie_Stratton_SFP", "fp_John_Cooke_SNP": "fp_John_Cooke_SNP", "fp_Lars_Frevert_Con": "fp_Lars_Frevert_Con", "fp_Martin_Greig_LD": "fp_Martin_Greig_LD", "fp_Ken_Mcleod_Con": "fp_Ken_Mcleod_Con", "fp_Mohamed_Abdul_Mosobbir_Lab": "fp_Mohamed_Abdul_Mosobbir_Lab", "fp_Becky_Rafferty_Gr": "fp_Becky_Rafferty_Gr", "fp_Jennifer_Stewart_Ind": "fp_Jennifer_Stewart_Ind", "fp_Derek_Davidson_SNP": "fp_Derek_Davidson_SNP", "fp_Ryan_Houghton_Con": "fp_Ryan_Houghton_Con", "fp_Logan_Andrew_Machell_Lab": "fp_Logan_Andrew_Machell_Lab", "fp_Harry_Rafferty_Gr": "fp_Harry_Rafferty_Gr", "fp_Ian_Yuill_LD": "fp_Ian_Yuill_LD", "fp_Brian_Allan_API": "fp_Brian_Allan_API", "fp_Christian_Allard_SNP": "fp_Christian_Allard_SNP", "fp_Paul_Dawson_Ind": "fp_Paul_Dawson_Ind", "fp_Lee_Fairfull_SNP": "fp_Lee_Fairfull_SNP", "fp_Esme_Houston_Gr": "fp_Esme_Houston_Gr", "fp_Oren_Katz_Libtn": "fp_Oren_Katz_Libtn", "fp_Michael_Kusznir_Con": "fp_Michael_Kusznir_Con", "fp_Gregor_Mcabery_LD": "fp_Gregor_Mcabery_LD", "fp_Simon_Mclean_Ind": "fp_Simon_Mclean_Ind", "fp_Simon_Peter_Watson_Lab": "fp_Simon_Peter_Watson_Lab", "fp_Charlie_Abel_API": "fp_Charlie_Abel_API", "fp_Richard_Brooks_Con": "fp_Richard_Brooks_Con", "fp_Moira_Henderson_LD": "fp_Moira_Henderson_LD", "fp_Heather_Herbert_Gr": "fp_Heather_Herbert_Gr", "fp_Bryce_Hope_Libtn": "fp_Bryce_Hope_Libtn", "fp_Alex_Nicoll_SNP": "fp_Alex_Nicoll_SNP", "fp_Miranda_Radley_SNP": "fp_Miranda_Radley_SNP", "fp_Lynn_Thomson_Lab": "fp_Lynn_Thomson_Lab", "fp_Nurul_Hoque_Ali_Lab": "fp_Nurul_Hoque_Ali_Lab", "fp_Alison_Alphonse_SNP": "fp_Alison_Alphonse_SNP", "fp_Harald_Rainer_Bartl_SFP": "fp_Harald_Rainer_Bartl_SFP", "fp_Sarah_Cross_Con": "fp_Sarah_Cross_Con", "fp_Mevrick_Renson_Fernandes_LD": "fp_Mevrick_Renson_Fernandes_LD", "fp_Sylvia_Hardie_Gr": "fp_Sylvia_Hardie_Gr", "fp_Jessica_Mennie_SNP": "fp_Jessica_Mennie_SNP", "fp_Matthew_Watt_Con": "fp_Matthew_Watt_Con", "fp_Kate_Blake_Lab": "fp_Kate_Blake_Lab", "fp_David_Cameron_SNP": "fp_David_Cameron_SNP", "fp_Steve_Delaney_LD": "fp_Steve_Delaney_LD", "fp_David_John_Mcgrath_Gr": "fp_David_John_Mcgrath_Gr", "fp_Sam_Ochola_SNP": "fp_Sam_Ochola_SNP", "fp_Dawn_Smith_SFP": "fp_Dawn_Smith_SFP", "fp_John_Wheeler_Con": "fp_John_Wheeler_Con", "fp_Nestor_Carlsen_Devereux_Con": "fp_Nestor_Carlsen_Devereux_Con", "fp_Donna_Clark_SNP": "fp_Donna_Clark_SNP", "fp_Sam_Forman_LD": "fp_Sam_Forman_LD", "fp_Gordon_Graham_Lab": "fp_Gordon_Graham_Lab", "fp_Lucas_Smith_Grant_TUSC": "fp_Lucas_Smith_Grant_TUSC", "fp_Graeme_Stephen_Lawrence_Lab": "fp_Graeme_Stephen_Lawrence_Lab", "fp_David_Maitland_API": "fp_David_Maitland_API", "fp_Louise_Mccafferty_Gr": "fp_Louise_Mccafferty_Gr", "fp_Ciaran_Mcrae_SNP": "fp_Ciaran_Mcrae_SNP", "fp_Hazel_Cameron_SNP": "fp_Hazel_Cameron_SNP", "fp_Neil_Copland_SNP": "fp_Neil_Copland_SNP", "fp_Freddie_John_Con": "fp_Freddie_John_Con", "fp_Peter_Kennedy_Gr": "fp_Peter_Kennedy_Gr", "fp_Jakub_Tomasz_Kurpanik_SFP": "fp_Jakub_Tomasz_Kurpanik_SFP", "fp_Sam_Petchey_LD": "fp_Sam_Petchey_LD", "fp_Deena_Tissera_Lab": "fp_Deena_Tissera_Lab", "fp_Vish_Archer_Con": "fp_Vish_Archer_Con", "fp_Eileen_Frances_Delaney_LD": "fp_Eileen_Frances_Delaney_LD", "fp_Graham_Charles_Elder_SFP": "fp_Graham_Charles_Elder_SFP", "fp_Ross_James_Grant_Lab": "fp_Ross_James_Grant_Lab", "fp_Ashish_Malik_Gr": "fp_Ashish_Malik_Gr", "fp_Alexander_Mclellan_SNP": "fp_Alexander_Mclellan_SNP", "fp_Peter_Nicol_Ind": "fp_Peter_Nicol_Ind", "fp_Robert_Reid_API": "fp_Robert_Reid_API", "fp_Shona_Simpson_Lab": "fp_Shona_Simpson_Lab", "fp_Kairin_Van_Sweeden_SNP": "fp_Kairin_Van_Sweeden_SNP", "fp_Jennifer_Bonsell_Lab": "fp_Jennifer_Bonsell_Lab", "fp_Bill_Cormie_SNP": "fp_Bill_Cormie_SNP", "fp_Emma_Farquhar_Con": "fp_Emma_Farquhar_Con", "fp_Alex_Jarvis_Gr": "fp_Alex_Jarvis_Gr", "fp_William_Mackenzie_SNP": "fp_William_Mackenzie_SNP", "fp_William_Sell_LD": "fp_William_Sell_LD", "fp_Desmond_Bouse_LD": "fp_Desmond_Bouse_LD", "fp_Mac_Ahmed_Chaudry_Ind": "fp_Mac_Ahmed_Chaudry_Ind", "fp_Dell_Henrickson_SNP": "fp_Dell_Henrickson_SNP", "fp_Michael_Hutchison_SNP": "fp_Michael_Hutchison_SNP", "fp_Guy_Ingerson_Gr": "fp_Guy_Ingerson_Gr", "fp_Sandra_Macdonald_Lab": "fp_Sandra_Macdonald_Lab", "fp_Shane_Painter_Con": "fp_Shane_Painter_Con", "fp_Marie_Louise_Boulton_Ind": "fp_Marie_Louise_Boulton_Ind", "fp_M_Tauqeer_Malik_Lab": "fp_M_Tauqeer_Malik_Lab", "fp_Duncan_Massey_Con": "fp_Duncan_Massey_Con", "fp_Sue_Mulkerrin_LD": "fp_Sue_Mulkerrin_LD", "fp_Ewan_Anderson_Ritchie_SNP": "fp_Ewan_Anderson_Ritchie_SNP", "fp_Gillian_Tebberen_Con": "fp_Gillian_Tebberen_Con", "fp_Daniel_Verhamme_Gr": "fp_Daniel_Verhamme_Gr", "fp_John_Alexander_SNP": "fp_John_Alexander_SNP", "fp_Callum_Baird_Gr": "fp_Callum_Baird_Gr", "fp_Daniel_Coleman_LD": "fp_Daniel_Coleman_LD", "fp_Susan_Ettle_SFP": "fp_Susan_Ettle_SFP", "fp_Stewart_Hunter_SNP": "fp_Stewart_Hunter_SNP", "fp_Maddie_Jamieson_TUSC": "fp_Maddie_Jamieson_TUSC", "fp_Kevin_Keenan_Lab": "fp_Kevin_Keenan_Lab", "fp_Calum_Walker_Con": "fp_Calum_Walker_Con", "fp_Laura_Whyte_API": "fp_Laura_Whyte_API", "fp_Jonathan_Bremner_LD": "fp_Jonathan_Bremner_LD", "fp_James_Hosie_SFP": "fp_James_Hosie_SFP", "fp_Gavin_Mackenzie_Con": "fp_Gavin_Mackenzie_Con", "fp_Charlie_Malone_Lab": "fp_Charlie_Malone_Lab", "fp_Alan_Ross_API": "fp_Alan_Ross_API", "fp_Wendy_Scullin_Lab": "fp_Wendy_Scullin_Lab", "fp_Roisin_Smith_SNP": "fp_Roisin_Smith_SNP", "fp_Siobhan_Tolland_SNP": "fp_Siobhan_Tolland_SNP", "fp_Kate_Treharne_Gr": "fp_Kate_Treharne_Gr", "fp_Ted_Booth_Gr": "fp_Ted_Booth_Gr", "fp_Bill_Campbell_SNP": "fp_Bill_Campbell_SNP", "fp_Michael_Crichton_LD": "fp_Michael_Crichton_LD", "fp_Nadia_El_Nakla_SNP": "fp_Nadia_El_Nakla_SNP", "fp_Donald_Hay_Con": "fp_Donald_Hay_Con", "fp_Annie_Jenkins_API": "fp_Annie_Jenkins_API", "fp_Brooke_Labagh_ISP": "fp_Brooke_Labagh_ISP", "fp_Fraser_Macpherson_LD": "fp_Fraser_Macpherson_LD", "fp_Richard_Mccready_LabCo": "fp_Richard_Mccready_LabCo", "fp_Scott_Agnew_API": "fp_Scott_Agnew_API", "fp_Naveed_Ali_Con": "fp_Naveed_Ali_Con", "fp_Heather_Anderson_SNP": "fp_Heather_Anderson_SNP", "fp_Jenny_Blain_LD": "fp_Jenny_Blain_LD", "fp_Mark_Flynn_SNP": "fp_Mark_Flynn_SNP", "fp_Tanya_Jones_Gr": "fp_Tanya_Jones_Gr", "fp_George_Mcirvine_Lab": "fp_George_Mcirvine_Lab", "fp_Wayne_Scott_TUSC": "fp_Wayne_Scott_TUSC", "fp_Helen_Wright_Lab": "fp_Helen_Wright_Lab", "fp_Georgia_Cruickshank_Lab": "fp_Georgia_Cruickshank_Lab", "fp_Rebecca_Dewar_LD": "fp_Rebecca_Dewar_LD", "fp_Ewan_Gurr_Sov": "fp_Ewan_Gurr_Sov", "fp_Sundas_Kamran_API": "fp_Sundas_Kamran_API", "fp_Ken_Lynn_SNP": "fp_Ken_Lynn_SNP", "fp_Danielle_Marr_Con": "fp_Danielle_Marr_Con", "fp_Lynne_Short_SNP": "fp_Lynne_Short_SNP", "fp_Martha_Elizabeth_Smart_Gr": "fp_Martha_Elizabeth_Smart_Gr", "fp_Jax_Finnegan_Lab": "fp_Jax_Finnegan_Lab", "fp_Lisa_Franchi_Con": "fp_Lisa_Franchi_Con", "fp_Heather_Mclean_API": "fp_Heather_Mclean_API", "fp_Steven_Rome_SNP": "fp_Steven_Rome_SNP", "fp_Willie_Sawers_SNP": "fp_Willie_Sawers_SNP", "fp_Mark_Smith_LD": "fp_Mark_Smith_LD", "fp_Stuart_White_Gr": "fp_Stuart_White_Gr", "fp_Bill_Crabb_Con": "fp_Bill_Crabb_Con", "fp_Will_Dawson_SNP": "fp_Will_Dawson_SNP", "fp_Outi_Maattanen_Bourke_LD": "fp_Outi_Maattanen_Bourke_LD", "fp_Dorothy_Mchugh_Lab": "fp_Dorothy_Mchugh_Lab", "fp_Alison_Mcintosh_Gr": "fp_Alison_Mcintosh_Gr", "fp_Allan_Petrie_API": "fp_Allan_Petrie_API", "fp_Christina_Roberts_SNP": "fp_Christina_Roberts_SNP", "fp_Thomas_Byrne_API": "fp_Thomas_Byrne_API", "fp_Kevin_Cordell_SNP": "fp_Kevin_Cordell_SNP", "fp_Craig_Duncan_LD": "fp_Craig_Duncan_LD", "fp_Qaiser_Habib_SNP": "fp_Qaiser_Habib_SNP", "fp_Mark_Parsons_Gr": "fp_Mark_Parsons_Gr", "fp_Derek_Scott_Con": "fp_Derek_Scott_Con", "fp_Philip_Scott_Con": "fp_Philip_Scott_Con", "fp_Pete_Shears_Lab": "fp_Pete_Shears_Lab", "fp_Carole_Smith_SFP": "fp_Carole_Smith_SFP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 21, "registered_not_positive": 21, "cast_gt_registered": 21}, "n_stations_flagged": 21, "created_at": "2026-07-03T11:43:28.919850", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.919, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.958, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.844, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.768, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.375, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.192, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.569, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.701, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.053, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.053, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2b74004bd6af432db19e2d10305ba6cb", "name": "United Kingdom 2022 local (overnight uk_scotland_edinburgh_2022_stv.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/mggg/scot-elex", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"n_candidates": "n_candidates", "fp_API": "fp_API", "fp_Comm": "fp_Comm", "fp_Con": "fp_Con", "fp_FA": "fp_FA", "fp_Gr": "fp_Gr", "fp_Ind": "fp_Ind", "fp_LD": "fp_LD", "fp_Lab": "fp_Lab", "fp_LabCo": "fp_LabCo", "fp_Libtn": "fp_Libtn", "fp_SFP": "fp_SFP", "fp_SLP": "fp_SLP", "fp_SNP": "fp_SNP", "fp_Soc": "fp_Soc", "fp_WEP": "fp_WEP", "fp_WPB": "fp_WPB"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 17, "registered_not_positive": 17, "votes_gt_valid": 17}, "n_stations_flagged": 17, "created_at": "2026-07-03T11:43:13.548918", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.919, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.958, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.844, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.768, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.375, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.192, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.569, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.701, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.053, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.053, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4e486c4756c744a79acc48093d89eb42", "name": "Romania 2020 parliamentary (overnight romania_2020_chamber_deputies.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Romania", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://prezenta.roaep.ro/parlamentare06122020/data/json/sicpv/pv/pv_{cc}_final.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"UNIUNEA DEMOCRAT\u0102 MAGHIAR\u0102 DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA DEMOCRAT\u0102 MAGHIAR\u0102 DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "PARTIDUL MI\u0218CAREA POPULAR\u0102": "PARTIDUL MI\u0218CAREA POPULAR\u0102", "PARTIDUL SOCIAL DEMOCRAT": "PARTIDUL SOCIAL DEMOCRAT", "PARTIDUL NA\u021aIONAL LIBERAL": "PARTIDUL NA\u021aIONAL LIBERAL", "ALIAN\u021aA USR PLUS": "ALIAN\u021aA USR PLUS", "PARTIDUL PRO ROM\u00c2NIA": "PARTIDUL PRO ROM\u00c2NIA", "PARTIDUL PUTERII UMANISTE (SOCIAL-LIBERAL)": "PARTIDUL PUTERII UMANISTE (SOCIAL-LIBERAL)", "ALIAN\u021aA PENTRU UNIREA ROM\u00c2NILOR": "ALIAN\u021aA PENTRU UNIREA ROM\u00c2NILOR", "PARTIDUL VERDE": "PARTIDUL VERDE", "PARTIDUL ECOLOGIST ROM\u00c2N": "PARTIDUL ECOLOGIST ROM\u00c2N", "ALIAN\u021aA RENA\u0218TEREA NA\u021aIONAL\u0102": "ALIAN\u021aA RENA\u0218TEREA NA\u021aIONAL\u0102", "PARTIDUL ROM\u00c2NIA MARE": "PARTIDUL ROM\u00c2NIA MARE", "UNIUNEA ARMENILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA ARMENILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "UNIUNEA UCRAINENILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA UCRAINENILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "UNIUNEA S\u00c2RBILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA S\u00c2RBILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "UNIUNEA DEMOCRAT\u0102 TURC\u0102 DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA DEMOCRAT\u0102 TURC\u0102 DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "FEDERA\u021aIA COMUNIT\u0102\u021aILOR EVREIE\u0218TI DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "FEDERA\u021aIA COMUNIT\u0102\u021aILOR EVREIE\u0218TI DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "ASOCIA\u021aIA ITALIENILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA \u2013 RO_AS_IT_": "ASOCIA\u021aIA ITALIENILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA \u2013 RO_AS_IT_", "UNIUNEA CULTURAL\u0102 A RUTENILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA CULTURAL\u0102 A RUTENILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "COMUNITATEA RU\u0218ILOR LIPOVENI DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "COMUNITATEA RU\u0218ILOR LIPOVENI DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "FORUMUL DEMOCRAT AL GERMANILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "FORUMUL DEMOCRAT AL GERMANILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "UNIUNEA CROA\u021aILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA CROA\u021aILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "ASOCIA\u021aIA PARTIDA ROMILOR \u201cPRO-EUROPA\u201d": "ASOCIA\u021aIA PARTIDA ROMILOR \u201cPRO-EUROPA\u201d", "UNIUNEA ELEN\u0102 DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA ELEN\u0102 DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "UNIUNEA POLONEZILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA POLONEZILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "UNIUNEA BULGAR\u0102 DIN BANAT-ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA BULGAR\u0102 DIN BANAT-ROM\u00c2NIA", "ASOCIA\u021aIA LIGA ALBANEZILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "ASOCIA\u021aIA LIGA ALBANEZILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "ASOCIA\u021aIA MACEDONENILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "ASOCIA\u021aIA MACEDONENILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "UNIUNEA DEMOCRATIC\u0102 A SLOVACILOR \u0218I CEHILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA DEMOCRATIC\u0102 A SLOVACILOR \u0218I CEHILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "PARTIDUL SOCIALIST ROM\u00c2N": "PARTIDUL SOCIALIST ROM\u00c2N", "PARTIDUL NOUA ROM\u00c2NIE": "PARTIDUL NOUA ROM\u00c2NIE", "PARTIDUL COMUNI\u0218TILOR": "PARTIDUL COMUNI\u0218TILOR", "PARTIDUL SOCIAL DEMOCRAT AL MUNCITORILOR": "PARTIDUL SOCIAL DEMOCRAT AL MUNCITORILOR", "PARTIDUL NOUA DREAPT\u0102": "PARTIDUL NOUA DREAPT\u0102", "PARTIDUL NA\u021aIUNEA ROM\u00c2N\u0102": "PARTIDUL NA\u021aIUNEA ROM\u00c2N\u0102", "BACIU VIRGIL": "BACIU VIRGIL", "ANDRIAN TIBERIU": "ANDRIAN TIBERIU", "DUMA VICTOR-SEBASTIAN": "DUMA VICTOR-SEBASTIAN", "PARTIDUL NA\u021aIONAL \u021a\u0102R\u0102NESC MANIU-MIHALACHE": "PARTIDUL NA\u021aIONAL \u021a\u0102R\u0102NESC MANIU-MIHALACHE", "CIOANCA NICOLAE-ILIE": "CIOANCA NICOLAE-ILIE", "RA\u0162IU OVIDIU-IOAN": "RA\u0162IU OVIDIU-IOAN", "PARTIDUL FOR\u021aA NA\u021aIONAL\u0102": "PARTIDUL FOR\u021aA NA\u021aIONAL\u0102", "TABARAC ADRIAN": "TABARAC ADRIAN", "CALU NECULAI": "CALU NECULAI", "ALBU ERWIN-VLAD": "ALBU ERWIN-VLAD", "IVAN ANDREI": "IVAN ANDREI", "ALTERNATIVA DREAPT\u0102": "ALTERNATIVA DREAPT\u0102", "NA\u015e SORIN-VALERIU": "NA\u015e SORIN-VALERIU", "UNIUNEA DEMOCRAT\u0102 A T\u0102TARILOR TURCO-MUSULMANI DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA DEMOCRAT\u0102 A T\u0102TARILOR TURCO-MUSULMANI DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "MARTIN CORINA": "MARTIN CORINA", "CRISTEA GEORGE": "CRISTEA GEORGE", "PETREA IONEL": "PETREA IONEL", "JALB\u0102 TIBERIU-MIHAI-ANTONIU": "JALB\u0102 TIBERIU-MIHAI-ANTONIU", "CARALICEA GHEORGHE": "CARALICEA GHEORGHE", "PARTIDUL RE:START ROM\u00c2NIA": "PARTIDUL RE:START ROM\u00c2NIA", "COSTEA VLAD": "COSTEA VLAD", "DAVID FELICIA": "DAVID FELICIA", "HOLICOV MONICA": "HOLICOV MONICA", "MITO\u015eERIU CIPRIAN OLIMPIU": "MITO\u015eERIU CIPRIAN OLIMPIU", "MATEI SERGIU-LUCIAN": "MATEI SERGIU-LUCIAN", "ZMARANDA FLORIN": "ZMARANDA FLORIN", "ZAINEA CORNEL": "ZAINEA CORNEL", "PESCARU NICU\u015eOR": "PESCARU NICU\u015eOR", "GEONEA IONELA-ALINA": "GEONEA IONELA-ALINA", "NICOLAE VALERIU-CIOLAN": "NICOLAE VALERIU-CIOLAN", "\u015eERBAN DANIELA": "\u015eERBAN DANIELA", "OPREA GABRIEL": "OPREA GABRIEL", "STOCHI\u0162\u0102 AUREL-C\u0102T\u0102LIN": "STOCHI\u0162\u0102 AUREL-C\u0102T\u0102LIN", "BENDORFEAN TRAIAN": "BENDORFEAN TRAIAN", "APOSTOLACHE MIHAI CRISTIAN": "APOSTOLACHE MIHAI CRISTIAN", "BOGDAN DUMITRU": "BOGDAN DUMITRU", "R\u0102DULESCU VIRGIL-FLORIN": "R\u0102DULESCU VIRGIL-FLORIN", "DU\u0162\u0102 MARIA-MIHAELA": "DU\u0162\u0102 MARIA-MIHAELA", "PAPICI MARCELA ANAMARIA": "PAPICI MARCELA ANAMARIA", "BLOCUL UNIT\u0102\u021aII NA\u021aIONALE": "BLOCUL UNIT\u0102\u021aII NA\u021aIONALE", "TR\u0102SC\u0102IAN PETRU-VASILE": "TR\u0102SC\u0102IAN PETRU-VASILE", "VECERDEA MARIUS-DANIEL": "VECERDEA MARIUS-DANIEL", "RADU DARIUS-CONSTANTIN": "RADU DARIUS-CONSTANTIN", "ICHIM COSTIC\u0102-ROMIC\u0102": "ICHIM COSTIC\u0102-ROMIC\u0102", "ZAMFIR-IGNAT \u015eTEFAN-COSTIN": "ZAMFIR-IGNAT \u015eTEFAN-COSTIN", "RO\u015eU GIC\u0102": "RO\u015eU GIC\u0102", "BULAT FLORIN": "BULAT FLORIN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19550, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-02T17:17:59.898514", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.451, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.896, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.805, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.676, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.451, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.125, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.6, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.676, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.601, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.601, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.347, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.347, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.911, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 19550}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "be596ab831ad4d6a98da7413fb0b6bfd", "name": "United States 2024 other (overnight us_il_2024_pres_primary_precinct.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "other", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.elections.il.gov/Downloads/ElectionOperations/ElectionResults/ByOffice/65/65-120-PRESIDENT-2024GP.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"biden_dem": "biden_dem", "phillips_dem": "phillips_dem", "williamson_dem": "williamson_dem", "lozada_dem": "lozada_dem", "writein_dem": "writein_dem", "trump_rep": "trump_rep", "haley_rep": "haley_rep", "desantis_rep": "desantis_rep", "christie_rep": "christie_rep", "binkley_rep": "binkley_rep", "writein_rep": "writein_rep"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10015, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2553, "cast_valid_mismatch": 7443, "registered_not_positive": 3432}, "n_stations_flagged": 8946, "created_at": "2026-07-02T17:17:19.837851", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10015}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a4ddcda80ade4008a48a892bf1d19e42", "name": "Sweden 2018 parliamentary (overnight sweden_2018_riksdag_valdistrikt.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://historik.val.se/val/val2018/statistik/2018_R_per_valdistrikt.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Moderaterna": "Moderaterna", "Centerpartiet": "Centerpartiet", "Liberalerna": "Liberalerna", "Kristdemokraterna": "Kristdemokraterna", "Arbetarepartiet-Socialdemokraterna": "Arbetarepartiet-Socialdemokraterna", "V\u00e4nsterpartiet": "V\u00e4nsterpartiet", "Milj\u00f6partiet de gr\u00f6na": "Milj\u00f6partiet de gr\u00f6na", "Sverigedemokraterna": "Sverigedemokraterna", "Feministiskt initiativ": "Feministiskt initiativ", "Piratpartiet": "Piratpartiet", "AfS": "AfS", "BASIP": "BASIP", "CSIS": "CSIS", "DD": "DD", "DjuP": "DjuP", "EAP": "EAP", "ENH": "ENH", "FHS": "FHS", "Gup": "Gup", "INI": "INI", "KLP": "KLP", "KrVP": "KrVP", "LPo": "LPo", "MED": "MED", "NMR": "NMR", "NORRP": "NORRP", "NYREF": "NYREF", "RNP": "RNP", "S-FRP": "S-FRP", "SKP": "SKP", "SK\u00c5": "SK\u00c5", "TRP": "TRP", "VL-S": "VL-S", "\u00d6VR": "\u00d6VR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6325, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 321, "cast_gt_registered": 321}, "n_stations_flagged": 321, "created_at": "2026-07-02T17:16:51.356098", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.88, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.915, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.908, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.875, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.297, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.187, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.547, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.008, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.008, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6325}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "09644203aabd4cae8a056859a545a0b9", "name": "South Africa 2024 local (overnight south_africa_2024_eastern_cape_provincial_per_vd.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.elections.org.za/home/NPEPublicReports/1335/Downloadable%20Results/Provincial.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ACTIONSA": "ACTIONSA", "AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY": "AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY", "AFRICAN CONGRESS FOR TRANSFORMATION": "AFRICAN CONGRESS FOR TRANSFORMATION", "AFRICAN INDEPENDENT CONGRESS": "AFRICAN INDEPENDENT CONGRESS", "AFRICAN MOVEMENT CONGRESS": "AFRICAN MOVEMENT CONGRESS", "AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS": "AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS", "AFRICAN PEOPLE'S CONVENTION": "AFRICAN PEOPLE'S CONVENTION", "AFRICAN TRANSFORMATION MOVEMENT": "AFRICAN TRANSFORMATION MOVEMENT", "AL JAMA-AH": "AL JAMA-AH", "ALLIANCE OF CITIZENS FOR CHANGE": "ALLIANCE OF CITIZENS FOR CHANGE", "ARISE SOUTH AFRICA": "ARISE SOUTH AFRICA", "AZANIAN PEOPLE'S ORGANISATION": "AZANIAN PEOPLE'S ORGANISATION", "BATHO PELE MOVEMENT": "BATHO PELE MOVEMENT", "BUILD ONE SOUTH AFRICA WITH MMUSI MAIMANE": "BUILD ONE SOUTH AFRICA WITH MMUSI MAIMANE", "CONGRESS OF THE PEOPLE": "CONGRESS OF THE PEOPLE", "DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE": "DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE", "ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS": "ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS", "GOOD": "GOOD", "INDEPENDENT SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL CIVIC ORGANISATION": "INDEPENDENT SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL CIVIC ORGANISATION", "INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY": "INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY", "KOMANI PROGRESS ACTION": "KOMANI PROGRESS ACTION", "PAN AFRICANIST CONGRESS OF AZANIA": "PAN AFRICANIST CONGRESS OF AZANIA", "PATRIOTIC ALLIANCE": "PATRIOTIC ALLIANCE", "RISE MZANSI": "RISE MZANSI", "UMKHONTO WESIZWE": "UMKHONTO WESIZWE", "UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT": "UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT", "VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS": "VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4867, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-07-02T17:16:30.378121", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.695, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.351, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.734, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.648, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.695, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.351, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.046, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.391, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.648, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.517, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4867}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "568c1f9f6a854c1689830c3df9801c1b", "name": "South Africa 2024 local (overnight south_africa_limpopo_2024_provincial.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.elections.org.za/home/NPEPublicReports/1335/Results%20Report/NP/{MUNI}/{VD}.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AL": "AL", "AADP": "AADP", "ACTIONSA": "ACTIONSA", "ACDP": "ACDP", "AFRICAN MOVEMENT CONGRESS": "AFRICAN MOVEMENT CONGRESS", "ANC": "ANC", "APC": "APC", "ATM": "ATM", "ALJAMA": "ALJAMA", "ACP": "ACP", "ASA": "ASA", "BPSA": "BPSA", "BOSA": "BOSA", "COPE": "COPE", "DA": "DA", "EFF": "EFF", "ELF-SA": "ELF-SA", "F4SD": "F4SD", "GOOD": "GOOD", "IFP": "IFP", "MOKONYANE MATSOBANE GERALD - 582816": "MOKONYANE MATSOBANE GERALD - 582816", "NIP": "NIP", "NDOU LOVEMORE RAY - 582100": "NDOU LOVEMORE RAY - 582100", "O.D": "O.D", "PAC": "PAC", "PA": "PA", "RISE": "RISE", "SADA": "SADA", "SAMEBA": "SAMEBA", "SARA": "SARA", "M.K.": "M.K.", "UAT": "UAT", "UDM": "UDM", "VF PLUS": "VF PLUS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3216, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-02T17:16:09.756228", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.695, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.351, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.734, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.648, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.695, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.351, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.046, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.391, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.648, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.517, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3216}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2b828c4dda714772b63e0cfd715c6485", "name": "Slovenia 2022 presidential (overnight slovenia_2022_presidential_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Slovenia", "year": 2022, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.dvk-rs.si/arhivi/volitve2022/vp2022/data/ (DVK-RS official archive of volitve.gov.si/vp2022; 88x volisca_{VE}_{OK}.json + rezultati.json/udelezba.json)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ANZE_LOGAR": "ANZE_LOGAR", "NATASA_PIRC_MUSAR": "NATASA_PIRC_MUSAR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3095, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 95, "cast_gt_registered": 96}, "n_stations_flagged": 96, "created_at": "2026-07-02T17:15:45.522233", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.839, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.914, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.808, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.728, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.839, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.722, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.112, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.548, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.744, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.705, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.705, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.928, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.095, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.095, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3095}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "114f351c8185415481c74bd1590785fb", "name": "Ecuador 2025 presidential (overnight ecuador_2025_r2_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Ecuador", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.cne.gob.ec/download/segunda-vuelta-2/?wpdmdl=57399", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_daniel_noboa_azin": "votes_daniel_noboa_azin", "votes_luisa_gonzalez": "votes_luisa_gonzalez"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2604, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 709, "registered_not_positive": 2604, "cast_gt_registered": 2603}, "n_stations_flagged": 2604, "created_at": "2026-07-02T17:15:32.654029", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.345, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.942, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.607, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.386, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.345, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.798, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.989, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.747, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.403, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.798, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.45, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.386, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.386, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.268, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.268, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.692, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.487, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.487, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.652, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.706, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2604}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5e07b1afc007471b94d9349fa9740c54", "name": "South Africa 2024 local (overnight south_africa_2024_mpumalanga_provincial_per_vd.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.elections.org.za/home/NPEPublicReports/1335/Downloadable%20Results/Provincial.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ABLE LEADERSHIP": "ABLE LEADERSHIP", "ACTIONSA": "ACTIONSA", "AFRICA RESTORATION ALLIANCE": "AFRICA RESTORATION ALLIANCE", "AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY": "AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY", "AFRICAN INDEPENDENT PEOPLE'S ORGANISATION": "AFRICAN INDEPENDENT PEOPLE'S ORGANISATION", "AFRICAN MOVEMENT CONGRESS": "AFRICAN MOVEMENT CONGRESS", "AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS": "AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS", "AFRICAN PEOPLE'S CONVENTION": "AFRICAN PEOPLE'S CONVENTION", "AFRICAN TRANSFORMATION MOVEMENT": "AFRICAN TRANSFORMATION MOVEMENT", "ARISE SOUTH AFRICA": "ARISE SOUTH AFRICA", "BOLSHEVIKS PARTY OF SOUTH AFRICA": "BOLSHEVIKS PARTY OF SOUTH AFRICA", "BUILD ONE SOUTH AFRICA WITH MMUSI MAIMANE": "BUILD ONE SOUTH AFRICA WITH MMUSI MAIMANE", "CONGRESS OF THE PEOPLE": "CONGRESS OF THE PEOPLE", "DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE": "DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE", "ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS": "ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS", "ECONOMIC LIBERATORS FORUM SOUTH AFRICA": "ECONOMIC LIBERATORS FORUM SOUTH AFRICA", "GOOD": "GOOD", "INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY": "INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY", "NATIONAL FREEDOM PARTY": "NATIONAL FREEDOM PARTY", "PAN AFRICANIST CONGRESS OF AZANIA": "PAN AFRICANIST CONGRESS OF AZANIA", "PATRIOTIC ALLIANCE": "PATRIOTIC ALLIANCE", "RISE MZANSI": "RISE MZANSI", "SINDAWONYE PROGRESSIVE PARTY": "SINDAWONYE PROGRESSIVE PARTY", "UMKHONTO WESIZWE": "UMKHONTO WESIZWE", "UNITED AFRICANS TRANSFORMATION": "UNITED AFRICANS TRANSFORMATION", "UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT": "UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT", "VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS": "VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1811, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-07-02T17:15:23.673924", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.695, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.351, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.734, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.648, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.695, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.351, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.046, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.391, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.648, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.517, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1811}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e90f210775be448283e35800fa30ec97", "name": "South Africa 2024 local (overnight south_africa_2024_north_west_provincial_per_vd.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.elections.org.za/home/NPEPublicReports/1335/Downloadable%20Results/Provincial.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ACTIONSA": "ACTIONSA", "AFRICA RESTORATION ALLIANCE": "AFRICA RESTORATION ALLIANCE", "AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY": "AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY", "AFRICAN CONGRESS FOR TRANSFORMATION": "AFRICAN CONGRESS FOR TRANSFORMATION", "AFRICAN INDEPENDENT CONGRESS": "AFRICAN INDEPENDENT CONGRESS", "AFRICAN MOVEMENT CONGRESS": "AFRICAN MOVEMENT CONGRESS", "AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS": "AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS", "AFRICAN PEOPLE'S CONVENTION": "AFRICAN PEOPLE'S CONVENTION", "AFRICAN TRANSFORMATION MOVEMENT": "AFRICAN TRANSFORMATION MOVEMENT", "AL JAMA-AH": "AL JAMA-AH", "ALL CITIZENS PARTY": "ALL CITIZENS PARTY", "ARISE SOUTH AFRICA": "ARISE SOUTH AFRICA", "BUILD ONE SOUTH AFRICA WITH MMUSI MAIMANE": "BUILD ONE SOUTH AFRICA WITH MMUSI MAIMANE", "CONGRESS OF THE PEOPLE": "CONGRESS OF THE PEOPLE", "DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE": "DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE", "ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS": "ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS", "ECONOMIC LIBERATORS FORUM SOUTH AFRICA": "ECONOMIC LIBERATORS FORUM SOUTH AFRICA", "FORUM 4 SERVICE DELIVERY": "FORUM 4 SERVICE DELIVERY", "GOOD": "GOOD", "INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY": "INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY", "PAN AFRICANIST CONGRESS OF AZANIA": "PAN AFRICANIST CONGRESS OF AZANIA", "PATRIOTIC ALLIANCE": "PATRIOTIC ALLIANCE", "RISE MZANSI": "RISE MZANSI", "SIZWE UMMAH NATION": "SIZWE UMMAH NATION", "UMKHONTO WESIZWE": "UMKHONTO WESIZWE", "UNITED AFRICANS TRANSFORMATION": "UNITED AFRICANS TRANSFORMATION", "UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT": "UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT", "VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS": "VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1738, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-07-02T17:15:15.039617", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.695, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.351, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.734, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.648, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.695, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.351, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.046, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.391, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.648, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.517, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1738}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "220af428157a448f8ae4cc0852dd2d2b", "name": "South Africa 2024 local (overnight south_africa_2024_free_state_provincial_per_vd.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.elections.org.za/home/NPEPublicReports/1335/Downloadable%20Results/Provincial.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ABANTU BATHO CONGRESS": "ABANTU BATHO CONGRESS", "ACTIONSA": "ACTIONSA", "AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY": "AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY", "AFRICAN CONGRESS FOR TRANSFORMATION": "AFRICAN CONGRESS FOR TRANSFORMATION", "AFRICAN CONTENT MOVEMENT": "AFRICAN CONTENT MOVEMENT", "AFRICAN MOVEMENT CONGRESS": "AFRICAN MOVEMENT CONGRESS", "AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS": "AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS", "AFRICAN PEOPLE'S CONVENTION": "AFRICAN PEOPLE'S CONVENTION", "AFRICAN TRANSFORMATION MOVEMENT": "AFRICAN TRANSFORMATION MOVEMENT", "ALL CITIZENS PARTY": "ALL CITIZENS PARTY", "ARISE SOUTH AFRICA": "ARISE SOUTH AFRICA", "BUILD ONE SOUTH AFRICA WITH MMUSI MAIMANE": "BUILD ONE SOUTH AFRICA WITH MMUSI MAIMANE", "CONGRESS OF THE PEOPLE": "CONGRESS OF THE PEOPLE", "DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE": "DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE", "ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS": "ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS", "FORUM 4 SERVICE DELIVERY": "FORUM 4 SERVICE DELIVERY", "GOOD": "GOOD", "INDEPENDENT": "INDEPENDENT", "INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY": "INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY", "NATIONAL FREEDOM PARTY": "NATIONAL FREEDOM PARTY", "PAN AFRICANIST CONGRESS OF AZANIA": "PAN AFRICANIST CONGRESS OF AZANIA", "PATRIOTIC ALLIANCE": "PATRIOTIC ALLIANCE", "RISE MZANSI": "RISE MZANSI", "UMKHONTO WESIZWE": "UMKHONTO WESIZWE", "UNITED AFRICANS TRANSFORMATION": "UNITED AFRICANS TRANSFORMATION", "UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT": "UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT", "VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS": "VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1586, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-07-02T17:15:07.254541", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.695, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.351, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.734, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.648, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.695, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.351, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.046, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.391, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.648, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.517, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1586}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "095e43050fd948f6b8e5c8be205e7e67", "name": "South Africa 2024 local (overnight south_africa_2024_northern_cape_provincial_per_vd.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.elections.org.za/home/NPEPublicReports/1335/Downloadable%20Results/Provincial.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"#HOPE4SA": "#HOPE4SA", "ACTIONSA": "ACTIONSA", "AFRICA RESTORATION ALLIANCE": "AFRICA RESTORATION ALLIANCE", "AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY": "AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY", "AFRICAN CONGRESS FOR TRANSFORMATION": "AFRICAN CONGRESS FOR TRANSFORMATION", "AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS": "AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS", "AFRICAN TRANSFORMATION MOVEMENT": "AFRICAN TRANSFORMATION MOVEMENT", "ALL CITIZENS PARTY": "ALL CITIZENS PARTY", "ARISE SOUTH AFRICA": "ARISE SOUTH AFRICA", "BUILD ONE SOUTH AFRICA WITH MMUSI MAIMANE": "BUILD ONE SOUTH AFRICA WITH MMUSI MAIMANE", "CONGRESS OF THE PEOPLE": "CONGRESS OF THE PEOPLE", "DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE": "DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE", "ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS": "ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS", "GOOD": "GOOD", "INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY": "INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY", "NORTHERN CAPE COMMUNITIES MOVEMENT": "NORTHERN CAPE COMMUNITIES MOVEMENT", "PAN AFRICANIST CONGRESS OF AZANIA": "PAN AFRICANIST CONGRESS OF AZANIA", "PATRIOTIC ALLIANCE": "PATRIOTIC ALLIANCE", "PEOPLE'S MOVEMENT FOR CHANGE": "PEOPLE'S MOVEMENT FOR CHANGE", "RISE MZANSI": "RISE MZANSI", "SOUTH AFRICAN ROYAL KINGDOMS ORGANIZATION": "SOUTH AFRICAN ROYAL KINGDOMS ORGANIZATION", "SOUTH AFRICAN YOUTH POWER PARTY": "SOUTH AFRICAN YOUTH POWER PARTY", "UMKHONTO WESIZWE": "UMKHONTO WESIZWE", "VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS": "VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 730, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-07-02T17:15:02.702965", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.695, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.351, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.734, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.648, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.695, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.351, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.046, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.391, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.648, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.517, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 730}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "133287127fdd464b9d8f5e1b972feec0", "name": "United States 2023 local (overnight us_cambridge_2023_council_stv.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Ayah A. Al-Zubi": "Ayah A. Al-Zubi", "Burhan Azeem": "Burhan Azeem", "Douglas P. Brown": "Douglas P. Brown", "John Hanratty": "John Hanratty", "Peter Hsu": "Peter Hsu", "Adrienne Klein": "Adrienne Klein", "Marc C. McGovern": "Marc C. McGovern", "Joe McGuirk": "Joe McGuirk", "Gregg J. Moree": "Gregg J. Moree", "Federico Muchnik": "Federico Muchnik", "Patricia M. Nolan": "Patricia M. Nolan", "Carrie E. Pasquarello": "Carrie E. Pasquarello", "Joan F. Pickett": "Joan F. Pickett", "Frantz Pierre": "Frantz Pierre", "Sumbul Siddiqui": "Sumbul Siddiqui", "E. Denise Simmons": "E. Denise Simmons", "Jivan G. Sobrinho-Wheeler": "Jivan G. Sobrinho-Wheeler", "Paul F. Toner": "Paul F. Toner", "Dan J. Totten": "Dan J. Totten", "Vernon K. Walker": "Vernon K. Walker", "Hao Wang": "Hao Wang", "Ayesha M. Wilson": "Ayesha M. Wilson", "Robert Winters": "Robert Winters", "Catherine Zusy": "Catherine Zusy", "Write-In": "Write-In"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 33, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-02T17:15:00.746140", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.857, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.789, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.44, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.61, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 33}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fbff061081314394a60eb2f73af4161d", "name": "United Kingdom 2022 local (overnight uk_ni_assembly_2022.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.eoni.org.uk/results-data/ni-assembly-election-2022-results/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"sinn_fein": "sinn_fein", "dup": "dup", "alliance": "alliance", "uup": "uup", "sdlp": "sdlp", "tuv": "tuv", "independent": "independent", "green": "green", "aontu": "aontu", "pbp": "pbp", "pup": "pup", "irsp": "irsp", "workers_party": "workers_party", "ccla": "ccla", "socialist_party": "socialist_party", "conservative": "conservative", "heritage": "heritage", "resume_ni": "resume_ni"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-02T17:14:59.629644", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.919, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.958, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.844, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.768, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.375, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.192, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.569, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.701, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.053, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.053, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "456b6ba34c854b85b94d8f8a34938769", "name": "France 2002 presidential (overnight france_2002_presidential_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2002, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.data.gouv.fr/datasets/election-presidentielle-2002-resultats-par-bureaux-de-vote (resource https://www.data.gouv.fr/api/1/datasets/r/17fbaf03-33f2-48d6-95e8-aaa13809e432)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CHIRAC": "CHIRAC", "LE_PEN": "LE_PEN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 64141, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-02T17:09:51.936305", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.861, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.874, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.801, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.517, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.353, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.088, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.059, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.059, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "RPR", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "FN", "margin": 64.43, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "FRA", "year": 2002, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 64141}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f963ff3087464bf4acf22cda77c109d9", "name": "Spain 2000 parliamentary (overnight spain_2000_congreso.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2000, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/JaimeObregon/infoelectoral/main/files/congreso/02200003_MESA/{09,10,03}020003.DAT (GitHub mirror JaimeObregon/infoelectoral of MIR .DAT microdata; official infoelectoral.interior.gob.es docxl 02200003_MESA.zip TLS-blocked)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_candidaturas": "votes_candidaturas", "A": "A", "AA": "AA", "ALAS": "ALAS", "AN": "AN", "AR": "AR", "AU_TO_NO_MO": "AU_TO_NO_MO", "B-LV": "B-LV", "BIA": "BIA", "BLM": "BLM", "BLOC-VERDS": "BLOC-VERDS", "BNG": "BNG", "CC": "CC", "CCS": "CCS", "CDN": "CDN", "CDS-UC": "CDS-UC", "CG": "CG", "CHA": "CHA", "CIU": "CIU", "CIVES": "CIVES", "CNC": "CNC", "CSD-L": "CSD-L", "DG": "DG", "EA": "EA", "EAJ-PNV": "EAJ-PNV", "EB-IU": "EB-IU", "EC": "EC", "EH": "EH", "EKA": "EKA", "EKA-PC": "EKA-PC", "EL-PAPI": "EL-PAPI", "ENV": "ENV", "ERC": "ERC", "ES2000": "ES2000", "EU": "EU", "EU-IU": "EU-IU", "EUIA": "EUIA", "EUPV": "EUPV", "EV-AV": "EV-AV", "EV-GV": "EV-GV", "EVIB": "EVIB", "FE": "FE", "FEI-FE 2000": "FEI-FE 2000", "FN": "FN", "FPG": "FPG", "FRONT-ERC": "FRONT-ERC", "GIL": "GIL", "IA": "IA", "IAN": "IAN", "IC-V": "IC-V", "II": "II", "INAR": "INAR", "IR-PRE": "IR-PRE", "IU": "IU", "IU-CM": "IU-CM", "IUC": "IUC", "IULV-CA": "IULV-CA", "IUN-NEB": "IUN-NEB", "LA FALANGE": "LA FALANGE", "LF": "LF", "LI (LIT-CI)": "LI (LIT-CI)", "LV": "LV", "LV-CM": "LV-CM", "LV-GV": "LV-GV", "LVE": "LVE", "LVRM": "LVRM", "MASH": "MASH", "N": "N", "NA": "NA", "NR": "NR", "PA": "PA", "PADE": "PADE", "PAE": "PAE", "PAR": "PAR", "PAS": "PAS", "PAVIEL": "PAVIEL", "PB": "PB", "PC": "PC", "PCL": "PCL", "PCPC": "PCPC", "PCPE": "PCPE", "PDEP": "PDEP", "PE2000": "PE2000", "PEDA": "PEDA", "PF": "PF", "PH": "PH", "PIL": "PIL", "PKD": "PKD", "PLA-ESP2000": "PLA-ESP2000", "PLAT_ ES_": "PLAT_ ES_", "PLN": "PLN", "PNCA": "PNCA", "POSI": "POSI", "PP": "PP", "PP-UPM": "PP-UPM", "PPCR": "PPCR", "PREPAL": "PREPAL", "PREX-CREX": "PREX-CREX", "PRGU": "PRGU", "PRIB": "PRIB", "PRIM": "PRIM", "PSC-PSOE": "PSC-PSOE", "PSDEG-PSOE": "PSDEG-PSOE", "PSE-EE-PSOE": "PSE-EE-PSOE", "PSM-EN": "PSM-EN", "PSOE": "PSOE", "PSOE-PROGR_": "PSOE-PROGR_", "PSPC": "PSPC", "P_RIOJANO": "P_RIOJANO", "SIEX": "SIEX", "TC-PNC": "TC-PNC", "TD": "TD", "TPC": "TPC", "UC-CDS": "UC-CDS", "UM-INME": "UM-INME", "UN": "UN", "UNIB": "UNIB", "UP-CAN": "UP-CAN", "UPB": "UPB", "UPL": "UPL", "UPN-PP": "UPN-PP", "UPZ": "UPZ", "URAL": "URAL", "URAS": "URAS", "URCL": "URCL", "USI": "USI", "UV": "UV", "VDPA": "VDPA", "VERDES": "VERDES"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 53696, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 53691}, "n_stations_flagged": 53691, "created_at": "2026-07-02T17:06:27.082278", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.897, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.817, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.705, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.719, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.09, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.038, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.038, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 53696}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "90687348a4904844b456f27faae49bd8", "name": "Poland 2005 parliamentary (overnight poland_2005_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://wybory2005.pkw.gov.pl/SJM/PL/WYN/W/index.htm (per-obwod protocols WYN/P/{woj}/{teryt}_{n}.htm)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"obwod_nr": "obwod_nr", "okreg": "okreg", "cards_issued": "cards_issued", "prawo_i_sprawiedliwosc": "prawo_i_sprawiedliwosc", "platforma_obywatelska_rp": "platforma_obywatelska_rp", "samoobrona_rzeczpospolitej_polskiej": "samoobrona_rzeczpospolitej_polskiej", "sojusz_lewicy_demokratycznej": "sojusz_lewicy_demokratycznej", "liga_polskich_rodzin": "liga_polskich_rodzin", "polskiego_stronnictwa_ludowego": "polskiego_stronnictwa_ludowego", "socjaldemokracji_polskiej": "socjaldemokracji_polskiej", "partii_demokratycznej_demokraci_pl": "partii_demokratycznej_demokraci_pl", "platformy_janusza_korwin_mikke": "platformy_janusza_korwin_mikke", "ruch_patriotyczny": "ruch_patriotyczny", "polska_partia_pracy": "polska_partia_pracy", "mniejszosc_niemiecka": "mniejszosc_niemiecka", "polskiej_partii_narodowej": "polskiej_partii_narodowej", "dom_ojczysty": "dom_ojczysty", "centrum": "centrum", "wyborcow_ogolnopolska_koalicja_obywatelska": "wyborcow_ogolnopolska_koalicja_obywatelska", "partii_inicjatywa_rp": "partii_inicjatywa_rp", "polskiej_konfederacji_godnosc_i_praca": "polskiej_konfederacji_godnosc_i_praca", "narodowego_odrodzenia_polski": "narodowego_odrodzenia_polski", "mniejszosci_niemieckiej_slaska": "mniejszosci_niemieckiej_slaska", "stronnictwa_pracy": "stronnictwa_pracy", "spoleczni_ratownicy": "spoleczni_ratownicy"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 25160, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 25160, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1279}, "n_stations_flagged": 25160, "created_at": "2026-07-02T17:04:50.320915", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.922, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.884, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.815, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.117, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.084, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.084, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Law and Justice (PIS)", "winner_candidate": "L. Kaczynski", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Civic Platform", "margin": 8.08, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "POL", "year": 2005, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 25160}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f44515e5d85244cd9062b99ea9d374ab", "name": "Greece 2009 parliamentary (overnight greece_2009_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Greece", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ekloges-prev.singularlogic.eu/v2009/ (Greek Ministry of Interior official 2009 legislative election results portal, operated by SingularLogic). Per-station data files dyndat/1/tm_<tmId>.js enumerated via dyn/ep_idx_<epId>.js across all 56 electoral districts. NOTE: host (Akamai) 403-blocks p", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ep_id": "ep_id", "dhm_id": "dhm_id", "\u03a0\u0391 \u03a3\u039f \u039a": "\u03a0\u0391 \u03a3\u039f \u039a", "\u039d\u03ad\u03b1 \u0394\u03b7\u03bc\u03bf\u03ba\u03c1\u03b1\u03c4\u03af\u03b1": "\u039d\u03ad\u03b1 \u0394\u03b7\u03bc\u03bf\u03ba\u03c1\u03b1\u03c4\u03af\u03b1", "\u039a \u039a \u0395": "\u039a \u039a \u0395", "\u039b\u0391 \u039f \u03a3": "\u039b\u0391 \u039f \u03a3", "\u03a3\u03a5 \u03a1\u0399\u0396 \u0391": "\u03a3\u03a5 \u03a1\u0399\u0396 \u0391", "\u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u039f\u0399 \u03a0\u03a1\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u039d\u039f\u0399": "\u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u039f\u0399 \u03a0\u03a1\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u039d\u039f\u0399", "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u0391\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0395\u039d\u039d\u0397\u03a3\u0397": "\u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u0391\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0395\u039d\u039d\u0397\u03a3\u0397", "\u0391\u03bd\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03b1\u03c0\u03b9\u03c4\u03b1\u03bb\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae \u0391\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03c1\u03ae \u03a3\u03c5\u03bd\u03b5\u03c1\u03b3\u03b1\u03c3\u03af\u03b1 (\u0391\u039d\u03a4 \u0391\u03a1 \u03a3\u03a5 \u0391 )": "\u0391\u03bd\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03b1\u03c0\u03b9\u03c4\u03b1\u03bb\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae \u0391\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03c1\u03ae \u03a3\u03c5\u03bd\u03b5\u03c1\u03b3\u03b1\u03c3\u03af\u03b1 (\u0391\u039d\u03a4 \u0391\u03a1 \u03a3\u03a5 \u0391 )", "\u0394\u03b7\u03bc \u0392\u03b5\u03c1\u03b3\u03ae\u03c2 \u0395\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039d\u0395\u03a3 \u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u039f\u0399": "\u0394\u03b7\u03bc \u0392\u03b5\u03c1\u03b3\u03ae\u03c2 \u0395\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039d\u0395\u03a3 \u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u039f\u0399", "\u039b\u03b1\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc\u03c2 \u03a3\u03cd\u03bd\u03b4\u03b5\u03c3\u03bc\u03bf\u03c2 - \u03a7\u03c1\u03c5\u03c3\u03ae \u0391\u03c5\u03b3\u03ae": "\u039b\u03b1\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc\u03c2 \u03a3\u03cd\u03bd\u03b4\u03b5\u03c3\u03bc\u03bf\u03c2 - \u03a7\u03c1\u03c5\u03c3\u03ae \u0391\u03c5\u03b3\u03ae", "\u0395\u03bd\u03c9\u03c3\u03b7 \u039a\u03b5\u03bd\u03c4\u03c1\u03ce\u03c9\u03bd": "\u0395\u03bd\u03c9\u03c3\u03b7 \u039a\u03b5\u03bd\u03c4\u03c1\u03ce\u03c9\u03bd", "\u039a\u039f\u0399\u039d\u03a9\u039d\u0399\u0391 \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u03a0\u0391\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0391\u039e\u0397 \u03c3\u03c5\u03bd\u03b5\u03c7\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03ce\u03bd \u03c4\u03bf\u03c5 \u039a\u0391\u03a0\u039f\u0394\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u03a1\u0399\u0391": "\u039a\u039f\u0399\u039d\u03a9\u039d\u0399\u0391 \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0399\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u03a0\u0391\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0391\u039e\u0397 \u03c3\u03c5\u03bd\u03b5\u03c7\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03ce\u03bd \u03c4\u03bf\u03c5 \u039a\u0391\u03a0\u039f\u0394\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u03a1\u0399\u0391", "\u039a\u039a\u0395 (\u03bc-\u03bb)": "\u039a\u039a\u0395 (\u03bc-\u03bb)", "\u0394\u03b7\u03bc\u03bf\u03ba\u03c1\u03b1\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03bf\u03af": "\u0394\u03b7\u03bc\u03bf\u03ba\u03c1\u03b1\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03bf\u03af", "\u039c\u0391\u03a1\u039e\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f-\u039b\u0395\u039d\u0399\u039d\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039a\u0395": "\u039c\u0391\u03a1\u039e\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f-\u039b\u0395\u039d\u0399\u039d\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039a\u0395", "\u0395\u03c1\u03b3\u03b1\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc \u0395\u03c0\u03b1\u03bd\u03b1\u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc \u039a\u03cc\u03bc\u03bc\u03b1": "\u0395\u03c1\u03b3\u03b1\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc \u0395\u03c0\u03b1\u03bd\u03b1\u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc \u039a\u03cc\u03bc\u03bc\u03b1", "\u039f \u0391 \u039a \u039a \u0395 \u039f\u03c1\u03b3\u03ac\u03bd\u03c9\u03c3\u03b7 \u03b3\u03b9\u03b1 \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u0391\u03bd\u03b1\u03c3\u03c5\u03b3\u03ba\u03c1\u03cc\u03c4\u03b7\u03c3\u03b7 \u03c4\u03bf\u03c5 \u039a\u039a\u0395": "\u039f \u0391 \u039a \u039a \u0395 \u039f\u03c1\u03b3\u03ac\u03bd\u03c9\u03c3\u03b7 \u03b3\u03b9\u03b1 \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u0391\u03bd\u03b1\u03c3\u03c5\u03b3\u03ba\u03c1\u03cc\u03c4\u03b7\u03c3\u03b7 \u03c4\u03bf\u03c5 \u039a\u039a\u0395", "\u03a7\u0391\u03a1\u0399\u0396\u03a9 \u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a0\u0395\u0394\u0391, \u03a7\u0391\u03a1\u0399\u0396\u03a9 \u03a7\u03a1\u0395\u0397, \u03a0\u03b1\u03bd\u03b1\u03b3\u03c1\u03bf\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc \u0395\u03c1\u03b3\u03b1\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc \u039a\u03af\u03bd\u03b7\u03bc\u03b1 \u0395\u03bb\u03bb\u03ac\u03b4\u03bf\u03c2 (\u03a0\u0391\u0395\u039a\u0395)": "\u03a7\u0391\u03a1\u0399\u0396\u03a9 \u039f\u0399\u039a\u039f\u03a0\u0395\u0394\u0391, \u03a7\u0391\u03a1\u0399\u0396\u03a9 \u03a7\u03a1\u0395\u0397, \u03a0\u03b1\u03bd\u03b1\u03b3\u03c1\u03bf\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc \u0395\u03c1\u03b3\u03b1\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc \u039a\u03af\u03bd\u03b7\u03bc\u03b1 \u0395\u03bb\u03bb\u03ac\u03b4\u03bf\u03c2 (\u03a0\u0391\u0395\u039a\u0395)", "\u039a \u039f \u03a4 \u0395 \u03a3 \u039a\u03b1\u03c0\u03bd\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03ad\u03c2 \u039f\u03bc\u03ac\u03b4\u03b5\u03c2 \u03b3\u03b9\u03b1 \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u03a4\u03ad\u03c7\u03bd\u03b7 \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9 \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u0395\u03b9\u03ba\u03b1\u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae \u03a3\u03c5\u03b3\u03ba\u03c1\u03cc\u03c4\u03b7\u03c3\u03b7": "\u039a \u039f \u03a4 \u0395 \u03a3 \u039a\u03b1\u03c0\u03bd\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03ad\u03c2 \u039f\u03bc\u03ac\u03b4\u03b5\u03c2 \u03b3\u03b9\u03b1 \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u03a4\u03ad\u03c7\u03bd\u03b7 \u03ba\u03b1\u03b9 \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u0395\u03b9\u03ba\u03b1\u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae \u03a3\u03c5\u03b3\u03ba\u03c1\u03cc\u03c4\u03b7\u03c3\u03b7", "\u03a6\u03c9\u03c2 \u0391\u03bb\u03ae\u03b8\u03b5\u03b9\u03b1 \u0394\u03b9\u03ba\u03b1\u03b9\u03bf\u03c3\u03cd\u03bd\u03b7": "\u03a6\u03c9\u03c2 \u0391\u03bb\u03ae\u03b8\u03b5\u03b9\u03b1 \u0394\u03b9\u03ba\u03b1\u03b9\u03bf\u03c3\u03cd\u03bd\u03b7", "\u0391\u03bd\u03b5\u03be \u03a5\u03c0\u03bf\u03c8": "\u0391\u03bd\u03b5\u03be \u03a5\u03c0\u03bf\u03c8", "\u03a0\u0395\u03a1\u0399\u03a6 \u0391\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u0391\u039d\u0391\u03a0\u03a4\u03a5\u039e\u0397 (\u03a0 \u0391 \u0391)": "\u03a0\u0395\u03a1\u0399\u03a6 \u0391\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u0391\u039d\u0391\u03a0\u03a4\u03a5\u039e\u0397 (\u03a0 \u0391 \u0391)", "\u03a6\u0399\u039b\u039f\u0399 \u03a4\u039f\u03a5 \u0391\u039d\u0398\u03a1\u03a9\u03a0\u039f\u03a5": "\u03a6\u0399\u039b\u039f\u0399 \u03a4\u039f\u03a5 \u0391\u039d\u0398\u03a1\u03a9\u03a0\u039f\u03a5", "\u03a0\u0391\u039b\u0391\u0399\u0391 \u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u0391": "\u03a0\u0391\u039b\u0391\u0399\u0391 \u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u0391"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20937, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 16270, "registered_not_positive": 8, "cast_gt_registered": 3, "votes_gt_valid": 20937}, "n_stations_flagged": 20937, "created_at": "2026-07-02T17:03:11.554071", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.942, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.966, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.901, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.812, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.966, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.992, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.054, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.513, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.901, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.256, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.256, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 20937}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "52c8f41d6560425ebd85b7b0c6071a43", "name": "Portugal 2026 presidential (overnight portugal_2026_presidential_r1.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 2026, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.eleicoes.mai.gov.pt/presidenciais2026_1S/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"territory_id": "territory_id", "is_foreign": "is_foreign", "Andr\u00e9 Ventura": "Andr\u00e9 Ventura", "Ant\u00f3nio Jos\u00e9 Seguro": "Ant\u00f3nio Jos\u00e9 Seguro", "Lu\u00eds Marques Mendes": "Lu\u00eds Marques Mendes", "Henrique Gouveia e Melo": "Henrique Gouveia e Melo", "Jo\u00e3o Cotrim de Figueiredo": "Jo\u00e3o Cotrim de Figueiredo", "Catarina Martins": "Catarina Martins", "Manuel Jo\u00e3o Vieira": "Manuel Jo\u00e3o Vieira", "Jorge Pinto": "Jorge Pinto", "Ant\u00f3nio Filipe": "Ant\u00f3nio Filipe", "Andr\u00e9 Pestana da Silva": "Andr\u00e9 Pestana da Silva", "Humberto Correia": "Humberto Correia"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3368, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 3368}, "n_stations_flagged": 3368, "created_at": "2026-07-02T15:43:08.609327", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.926, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.717, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.228, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.919, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.166, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.166, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.899, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3368}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f89c1614dd624e3eba4c2bae0ab5ef12", "name": "Greece 2012 parliamentary (june 2012, repeat election) (overnight greece_2012jun_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Greece", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ekloges-prev.singularlogic.eu/v2012b/  (Greek Ministry of Interior official results, operated by SingularLogic; per-unit JSON at /v2012b/dyn/den_{DEN_ID}.js; unit master in /v2012b/stat/statics.js)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"DEN_ID": "DEN_ID", "DHM_ID": "DHM_ID", "EP_ID": "EP_ID", "PASOK__1": "PASOK__1", "Nea_Dimokratia_ND__2": "Nea_Dimokratia_ND__2", "KKE__3": "KKE__3", "SYRIZA_EKM__4": "SYRIZA_EKM__4", "KKE_ml_ML_KKE__12": "KKE_ml_ML_KKE__12", "Komma_Fileleftheron__14": "Komma_Fileleftheron__14", "Enosi_Kentroon__15": "Enosi_Kentroon__15", "LAOS__16": "LAOS__16", "Oikologoi_Prasinoi__28": "Oikologoi_Prasinoi__28", "Chrysi_Avgi_Golden_Dawn__41": "Chrysi_Avgi_Golden_Dawn__41", "Koinonia_Kapodistria__42": "Koinonia_Kapodistria__42", "ANTARSYA__44": "ANTARSYA__44", "DIMAR_Dimokratiki_Aristera__56": "DIMAR_Dimokratiki_Aristera__56", "ANEL_Anexartitoi_Ellines__57": "ANEL_Anexartitoi_Ellines__57", "Komma_Peiraton__61": "Komma_Peiraton__61", "Den_Plirono__62": "Den_Plirono__62", "Panathinaiko_Kinima__65": "Panathinaiko_Kinima__65", "KEAN__67": "KEAN__67", "AN_ARIST_etc__70": "AN_ARIST_etc__70", "Dimiourgia_Xana__71": "Dimiourgia_Xana__71", "Ethniki_Elpida__72": "Ethniki_Elpida__72", "Anexartitoi_Memonomenoi__998": "Anexartitoi_Memonomenoi__998"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1035, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 998, "votes_gt_valid": 1035}, "n_stations_flagged": 1035, "created_at": "2026-07-02T15:43:03.456740", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.943, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.966, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.897, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.81, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.966, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.992, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.055, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.514, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.212, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.212, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1035}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "41e3ec04247044689cb952ebb2013fa7", "name": "United Kingdom 2017 parliamentary (overnight uk_2017_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7979/HoC-GE2017-results-by-constituency.csv (via Wayback 20260206095410id_; parliament.uk Cloudflare-challenged)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"con": "con", "lab": "lab", "ld": "ld", "ukip": "ukip", "green": "green", "snp": "snp", "pc": "pc", "dup": "dup", "sf": "sf", "sdlp": "sdlp", "uup": "uup", "apni": "apni", "other": "other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 650, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-02T14:23:02.325300", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.915, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.958, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.865, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.801, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.531, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.389, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.038, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.038, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 650}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "897eaf7ced6f443ca26038cee91b20ee", "name": "India 2019 parliamentary (overnight india_2019_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/All_States/All_States_GE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pc_no": "pc_no", "n_candidates": "n_candidates", "AAAP": "AAAP", "AABHAP": "AABHAP", "AACP": "AACP", "AAHPty": "AAHPty", "AAM": "AAM", "AAPP": "AAPP", "ABD": "ABD", "ABEP": "ABEP", "ABGP": "ABGP", "ABHM": "ABHM", "ABHP": "ABHP", "ABHS": "ABHS", "ABJS": "ABJS", "ABLP": "ABLP", "ABML(S)": "ABML(S)", "ABMP": "ABMP", "ABNNP": "ABNNP", "ABSKP": "ABSKP", "ABSSP": "ABSSP", "ACDP": "ACDP", "ACP": "ACP", "ADAL": "ADAL", "ADMK": "ADMK", "ADPT": "ADPT", "ADRP": "ADRP", "ADRSP": "ADRSP", "ADUP": "ADUP", "AGP": "AGP", "AHFBK": "AHFBK", "AHIMSASP": "AHIMSASP", "AHNP": "AHNP", "AIDMMK": "AIDMMK", "AIFB": "AIFB", "AIJAP": "AIJAP", "AIMAK": "AIMAK", "AIMF": "AIMF", "AIMIM": "AIMIM", "AINHCP": "AINHCP", "AINPP": "AINPP", "AINRC": "AINRC", "AIP": "AIP", "AIPF": "AIPF", "AIPTMMK": "AIPTMMK", "AIRCP": "AIRCP", "AITC": "AITC", "AIUC": "AIUC", "AIUDF": "AIUDF", "AIUUK": "AIUUK", "AIVP": "AIVP", "AJM": "AJM", "AJNSP": "AJNSP", "AJPI": "AJPI", "AJPR": "AJPR", "AJSUP": "AJSUP", "AKBHAD": "AKBHAD", "AKBJHP": "AKBJHP", "AKBMP": "AKBMP", "AKHP": "AKHP", "AKSP": "AKSP", "ALHP": "ALHP", "ALINLBP": "ALINLBP", "ALoP": "ALoP", "AMB": "AMB", "AMKP": "AMKP", "AMPK": "AMPK", "AMiP": "AMiP", "ANC": "ANC", "ANIJP": "ANIJP", "ANNADATA": "ANNADATA", "ANRP": "ANRP", "ANSP": "ANSP", "APEP": "APEP", "APKSP": "APKSP", "APoI": "APoI", "ARK": "ARK", "ARP": "ARP", "ARPS": "ARPS", "ASDC": "ASDC", "ASDHP": "ASDHP", "ASGP": "ASGP", "ASJP": "ASJP", "ASP": "ASP", "ASaP": "ASaP", "ATBP": "ATBP", "AVIRP": "AVIRP", "AVVP": "AVVP", "AYP": "AYP", "AYSRCP": "AYSRCP", "AgIMK": "AgIMK", "AlPP": "AlPP", "AnAP": "AnAP", "BAAP": "BAAP", "BAEP": "BAEP", "BAHUMP": "BAHUMP", "BALP": "BALP", "BARESP": "BARESP", "BARP": "BARP", "BAWPA": "BAWPA", "BBC": "BBC", "BBKD": "BBKD", "BBM": "BBM", "BBMP": "BBMP", "BBPP": "BBPP", "BCUF": "BCUF", "BDJS": "BDJS", "BDPty": "BDPty", "BDlP": "BDlP", "BEPP": "BEPP", "BGanP": "BGanP", "BHABHAPA": "BHABHAPA", "BHAIP": "BHAIP", "BHAPRAP": "BHAPRAP", "BHAZS": "BHAZS", "BHBHP": "BHBHP", "BHBP": "BHBP", "BHHF": "BHHF", "BHJMP": "BHJMP", "BHMP": "BHMP", "BHPP": "BHPP", "BHTJP": "BHTJP", "BJAZP": "BJAZP", "BJD": "BJD", "BJKD": "BJKD", "BJKVP": "BJKVP", "BJNP": "BJNP", "BJP": "BJP", "BJSAP": "BJSAP", "BJSPP": "BJSPP", "BJSTP": "BJSTP", "BKNP": "BKNP", "BKPP": "BKPP", "BKVP": "BKVP", "BKrD": "BKrD", "BLND": "BLND", "BLRP": "BLRP", "BLSD": "BLSD", "BLSP": "BLSP", "BLokSP": "BLokSP", "BMF": "BMF", "BMFP": "BMFP", "BMJP": "BMJP", "BMSM": "BMSM", "BMUP": "BMUP", "BMVSP": "BMVSP", "BMtrP": "BMtrP", "BNARP": "BNARP", "BND": "BND", "BNDl": "BNDl", "BNIP": "BNIP", "BNJD": "BNJD", "BNSKP": "BNSKP", "BNavP": "BNavP", "BOPF": "BOPF", "BPC": "BPC", "BPKP": "BPKP", "BPSJP": "BPSJP", "BRKP(D)": "BRKP(D)", "BRM": "BRM", "BRP": "BRP", "BRPI": "BRPI", "BRPPA": "BRPPA", "BRSP": "BRSP", "BSCP": "BSCP", "BSDL": "BSDL", "BSHSP": "BSHSP", "BSKP": "BSKP", "BSKRP": "BSKRP", "BSP": "BSP", "BSP(A)": "BSP(A)", "BSPM": "BSPM", "BSSPA": "BSSPA", "BSUSP": "BSUSP", "BTARP": "BTARP", "BTP": "BTP", "BUNKD": "BUNKD", "BVA": "BVA", "BYPP": "BYPP", "BaHaP": "BaHaP", "BaJD": "BaJD", "BaSaPa": "BaSaPa", "BaVaP": "BaVaP", "BhAmAP": "BhAmAP", "BhBSP": "BhBSP", "BhNP": "BhNP", "BhaRP": "BhaRP", "CDF": "CDF", "CHALP": "CHALP", "CHKAP": "CHKAP", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "CPIM": "CPIM", "CPM": "CPM", "CSM": "CSM", "CoAP": "CoAP", "DABAP": "DABAP", "DAMK": "DAMK", "DCLF": "DCLF", "DJHP": "DJHP", "DKSP": "DKSP", "DMDK": "DMDK", "DMK": "DMK", "DMSK": "DMSK", "DPI": "DPI", "DPIN": "DPIN", "DPPS": "DPPS", "DSPVAD": "DSPVAD", "DSSP": "DSSP", "DUUK": "DUUK", "EP": "EP", "ESP": "ESP", "ETMK": "ETMK", "FDLP": "FDLP", "FIP": "FIP", "FJP": "FJP", "FPI": "FPI", "GAGUP": "GAGUP", "GGP": "GGP", "GJNP": "GJNP", "GJPP": "GJPP", "GPI": "GPI", "GaAP": "GaAP", "HAMS": "HAMS", "HAPa": "HAPa", "HBP": "HBP", "HCP": "HCP", "HIMJKP": "HIMJKP", "HJP": "HJP", "HMRD": "HMRD", "HMSKP": "HMSKP", "HND": "HND", "HSP": "HSP", "HSS": "HSS", "HiPPa": "HiPPa", "HuSP": "HuSP", "ICF": "ICF", "IDRP": "IDRP", "IICR": "IICR", "ILP(AP)": "ILP(AP)", "IMK": "IMK", "INC": "INC", "INCP": "INCP", "IND": "IND", "INDPP": "INDPP", "INL": "INL", "INLD": "INLD", "IPBP": "IPBP", "IPFT": "IPFT", "IPGP": "IPGP", "IRNP": "IRNP", "IUC": "IUC", "IUML": "IUML", "IVD": "IVD", "JAAP": "JAAP", "JAC": "JAC", "JAJGP": "JAJGP", "JANADIP": "JANADIP", "JANKRPR": "JANKRPR", "JANSAPP": "JANSAPP", "JAPL": "JAPL", "JASP": "JASP", "JASWP": "JASWP", "JD": "JD", "JD(S)": "JD(S)", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "JDL": "JDL", "JDR": "JDR", "JGHTP": "JGHTP", "JHAP": "JHAP", "JHBHP": "JHBHP", "JHP": "JHP", "JJJKP": "JJJKP", "JKN": "JKN", "JKNPP": "JKNPP", "JKP": "JKP", "JKP(N)": "JKP(N)", "JKPDP": "JKPDP", "JKPP": "JKPP", "JKPPAP": "JKPPAP", "JKPS": "JKPS", "JKiP": "JKiP", "JLokP": "JLokP", "JMBP": "JMBP", "JMM": "JMM", "JMM(U)": "JMM(U)", "JNJP": "JNJP", "JNSMP": "JNSMP", "JP": "JP", "JPC": "JPC", "JPD": "JPD", "JPJD": "JPJD", "JPS": "JPS", "JRPa": "JRPa", "JRVP": "JRVP", "JSEP": "JSEP", "JSP": "JSP", "JSVP": "JSVP", "JTVP": "JTVP", "JVBP": "JVBP", "JVM": "JVM", "JaSD": "JaSD", "JaSSP": "JaSSP", "JanSP": "JanSP", "JeSM": "JeSM", "JnP": "JnP", "KARASP": "KARASP", "KBD": "KBD", "KCVP": "KCVP", "KEC": "KEC", "KEC(M)": "KEC(M)", "KHSNP": "KHSNP", "KJP": "KJP", "KKJHS": "KKJHS", "KKMP": "KKMP", "KMBS": "KMBS", "KMSP": "KMSP", "KPJP": "KPJP", "KPOI": "KPOI", "KPPR": "KPPR", "KPPU": "KPPU", "KRUP": "KRUP", "KS": "KS", "KSRP": "KSRP", "KSRSP": "KSRSP", "LAJSP": "LAJSP", "LCD": "LCD", "LD": "LD", "LIP": "LIP", "LJGP": "LJGP", "LJP": "LJP", "LJSPty": "LJSPty", "LJVM": "LJVM", "LKSGM": "LKSGM", "LOGAP": "LOGAP", "LOKJANP": "LOKJANP", "LPSP": "LPSP", "LSD": "LSD", "LTSP": "LTSP", "LoRP": "LoRP", "MADP": "MADP", "MAHKRS": "MAHKRS", "MARD": "MARD", "MCPI": "MCPI", "MDKMGPH": "MDKMGPH", "MDPF": "MDPF", "MHD": "MHD", "MKDVP": "MKDVP", "MKUP": "MKUP", "MKat": "MKat", "MLJK": "MLJK", "MLPOIRF": "MLPOIRF", "MMKA": "MMKA", "MNDP": "MNDP", "MNF": "MNF", "MNM": "MNM", "MNVP": "MNVP", "MOSP": "MOSP", "MPEP": "MPEP", "MPJVP": "MPJVP", "MPOI": "MPOI", "MPP": "MPP", "MSHP": "MSHP", "MSJP": "MSJP", "MSKK": "MSKK", "MYSP": "MYSP", "MaNPa": "MaNPa", "ManJP": "ManJP", "ManKP": "ManKP", "MwSP": "MwSP", "NABMUP": "NABMUP", "NALAP": "NALAP", "NAP": "NAP", "NAPt": "NAPt", "NATJUP": "NATJUP", "NATWOMP": "NATWOMP", "NAWPP": "NAWPP", "NCP": "NCP", "NDDHP": "NDDHP", "NDEP": "NDEP", "NDPOI": "NDPOI", "NDPP": "NDPP", "NED": "NED", "NEINDP": "NEINDP", "NEP": "NEP", "NFFF": "NFFF", "NIDP": "NIDP", "NIP": "NIP", "NIRBHP": "NIRBHP", "NJANP": "NJANP", "NJP": "NJP", "NNKP": "NNKP", "NNMP": "NNMP", "NNP": "NNP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "NPEP": "NPEP", "NPF": "NPF", "NPRP": "NPRP", "NPSF": "NPSF", "NPT": "NPT", "NRCP": "NRCP", "NRCong": "NRCong", "NSBHP": "NSBHP", "NSCBRAP": "NSCBRAP", "NTK": "NTK", "NVSP": "NVSP", "NYP": "NYP", "NaLP": "NaLP", "NavaP": "NavaP", "OPD": "OPD", "PAP": "PAP", "PBI": "PBI", "PDP": "PDP", "PDS": "PDS", "PECP": "PECP", "PGSP": "PGSP", "PHJSP": "PHJSP", "PHRC": "PHRC", "PHSP": "PHSP", "PJSP": "PJSP", "PLM": "PLM", "PLP": "PLP", "PMK": "PMK", "PMP": "PMP", "PMPT": "PMPT", "PMSP": "PMSP", "PNP": "PNP", "PPA": "PPA", "PPID": "PPID", "PPIS": "PPIS", "PPOI": "PPOI", "PRCP": "PRCP", "PRISM": "PRISM", "PRISMP": "PRISMP", "PRJP": "PRJP", "PRSHP": "PRSHP", "PRSP": "PRSP", "PSJP": "PSJP", "PSPL": "PSPL", "PSPU": "PSPU", "PSS": "PSS", "PUDEP": "PUDEP", "PUJP": "PUJP", "PUNEKP": "PUNEKP", "PUNP": "PUNP", "PrStP": "PrStP", "RABSP": "RABSP", "RACHEP": "RACHEP", "RADM": "RADM", "RAHIS": "RAHIS", "RAHM": "RAHM", "RAIM": "RAIM", "RAJADP": "RAJADP", "RAJSPty": "RAJSPty", "RAJUP": "RAJUP", "RAKRD": "RAKRD", "RAPI": "RAPI", "RAPty": "RAPty", "RASAP": "RASAP", "RASHLSP": "RASHLSP", "RASJGP": "RASJGP", "RASMARP": "RASMARP", "RBCP": "RBCP", "RBJJP": "RBJJP", "RBP": "RBP", "RBS": "RBS", "RD": "RD", "RDHP": "RDHP", "RDU": "RDU", "REALDP": "REALDP", "RGD": "RGD", "RGOP": "RGOP", "RHSP": "RHSP", "RJANSWP": "RJANSWP", "RJAPU": "RJAPU", "RJAVP": "RJAVP", "RJBP": "RJBP", "RJBVP": "RJBVP", "RJD": "RJD", "RJNP": "RJNP", "RJPD": "RJPD", "RJSNP": "RJSNP", "RJSPS": "RJSPS", "RJanPty": "RJanPty", "RJnPty": "RJnPty", "RJsbhP": "RJsbhP", "RKSP": "RKSP", "RLD": "RLD", "RLTP": "RLTP", "RMEP": "RMEP", "RMGLMP": "RMGLMP", "RMGP": "RMGP", "RMMP": "RMMP", "RMPOI": "RMPOI", "RND": "RND", "RNNBP": "RNNBP", "RP(K)": "RP(K)", "RPB": "RPB", "RPC(S)": "RPC(S)", "RPI": "RPI", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "RPI(KH)": "RPI(KH)", "RPI(KM)": "RPI(KM)", "RPIE": "RPIE", "RPIK": "RPIK", "RPIR": "RPIR", "RPP": "RPP", "RPWP": "RPWP", "RRP": "RRP", "RRS": "RRS", "RSDal": "RSDal", "RSJVP": "RSJVP", "RSMD": "RSMD", "RSOSP": "RSOSP", "RSP": "RSP", "RSP(S)": "RSP(S)", "RSPS": "RSPS", "RSPSR": "RSPSR", "RSTSAHP": "RSTSAHP", "RSVP": "RSVP", "RSWD": "RSWD", "RTAMP": "RTAMP", "RTBHP": "RTBHP", "RTJPS": "RTJPS", "RTKP": "RTKP", "RTORP": "RTORP", "RTSGP": "RTSGP", "RUC": "RUC", "RVLP": "RVLP", "RVNP": "RVNP", "RVP": "RVP", "RVZP": "RVZP", "RVyP": "RVyP", "RaAD": "RaAD", "RaIP": "RaIP", "RaJPa": "RaJPa", "RaJSP": "RaJSP", "RaNP": "RaNP", "RasLP": "RasLP", "RsAD": "RsAD", "RtrJP": "RtrJP", "SAAFP": "SAAFP", "SABHP": "SABHP", "SABJANP": "SABJANP", "SACP": "SACP", "SAD": "SAD", "SAD(M)": "SAD(M)", "SADSP": "SADSP", "SADT": "SADT", "SAJP": "SAJP", "SAKAP": "SAKAP", "SAKSP": "SAKSP", "SANVP": "SANVP", "SAPRP": "SAPRP", "SATKP": "SATKP", "SAVIPA": "SAVIPA", "SBM": "SBM", "SBSP": "SBSP", "SBSPSP": "SBSPSP", "SDC": "SDC", "SDF": "SDF", "SDP(MP)": "SDP(MP)", "SDPI": "SDPI", "SDSP": "SDSP", "SDU": "SDU", "SFP": "SFP", "SGUP": "SGUP", "SHF": "SHF", "SHS": "SHS", "SJDD": "SJDD", "SJPA": "SJPA", "SJPI": "SJPI", "SJPT": "SJPT", "SJSMP": "SJSMP", "SJVP": "SJVP", "SKM": "SKM", "SKPP": "SKPP", "SLDP": "SLDP", "SMARTIP": "SMARTIP", "SMFB": "SMFB", "SNP": "SNP", "SP": "SP", "SP(I)": "SP(I)", "SPAKP": "SPAKP", "SPL": "SPL", "SPRP": "SPRP", "SSBD": "SSBD", "SSD": "SSD", "STBP": "STBP", "STBSP": "STBSP", "STPI": "STPI", "SUCI(C)": "SUCI(C)", "SUSP": "SUSP", "SUTF": "SUTF", "SVJSP": "SVJSP", "SVPP": "SVPP", "SWAJANPA": "SWAJANPA", "SWAP": "SWAP", "SWJP": "SWJP", "SWP": "SWP", "SWSP": "SWSP", "SaBP": "SaBP", "SaDa": "SaDa", "SaRaPa": "SaRaPa", "SaSaP": "SaSaP", "SaVP": "SaVP", "SamSP": "SamSP", "SanS": "SanS", "SatBP": "SatBP", "SoJP": "SoJP", "SwaBP": "SwaBP", "TDP": "TDP", "TECPI": "TECPI", "TELYS": "TELYS", "TGPJP": "TGPJP", "TJS": "TJS", "TMC(M)": "TMC(M)", "TNLK": "TNLK", "TNRMPI": "TNRMPI", "TRIPP": "TRIPP", "TRS": "TRS", "TSP": "TSP", "TTNP": "TTNP", "ToP": "ToP", "UBM": "UBM", "UDFS": "UDFS", "UDP": "UDP", "UKDD": "UKDD", "UKKD": "UKKD", "UMK": "UMK", "UPJP": "UPJP", "UPNSE": "UPNSE", "UPP": "UPP", "UPPL": "UPPL", "USIP": "USIP", "UtPP": "UtPP", "VBA": "VBA", "VCK": "VCK", "VCSMP": "VCSMP", "VIP": "VIP", "VIPty": "VIPty", "VJNP": "VJNP", "VMMKT": "VMMKT", "VMSKP": "VMSKP", "VPI": "VPI", "VPP": "VPP", "VSIP": "VSIP", "VSP": "VSP", "VoP": "VoP", "WAP": "WAP", "WPOI": "WPOI", "YJJP": "YJJP", "YKP": "YKP", "YSRCP": "YSRCP", "YSRPP": "YSRPP", "YVP": "YVP", "YuS": "YuS", "aicp": "aicp", "bjdi": "bjdi", "bmd": "bmd", "bns": "bns", "cvgrp": "cvgrp", "grac": "grac", "igp": "igp", "jhspt": "jhspt", "kajp": "kajp", "mimm": "mimm", "pjdl": "pjdl", "rajpt": "rajpt", "ravp": "ravp", "rpsn": "rpsn", "skd": "skd", "ssrd": "ssrd", "svjn": "svjn", "swbi": "swbi"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 543, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 543}, "n_stations_flagged": 543, "created_at": "2026-07-02T14:22:58.836721", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.43, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.324, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.656, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.664, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.43, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.43, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.324, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.324, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.563, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.527, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 543}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "11986cc77e6c4aaab695220d8a736b31", "name": "Germany 2009 parliamentary (overnight germany_2009_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.bundeswahlleiterin.de/dam/jcr/0d80891b-aa0b-443b-9a45-007d28a9b817/btw09_kerg.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"wahlkreis_nr": "wahlkreis_nr", "SPD": "SPD", "CDU": "CDU", "FDP": "FDP", "DIE LINKE": "DIE LINKE", "GR\u00dcNE": "GR\u00dcNE", "CSU": "CSU", "NPD": "NPD", "REP": "REP", "FAMILIE": "FAMILIE", "Die Tierschutzpartei": "Die Tierschutzpartei", "PBC": "PBC", "MLPD": "MLPD", "B\u00fcSo": "B\u00fcSo", "BP": "BP", "PSG": "PSG", "Volksabstimmung": "Volksabstimmung", "ZENTRUM": "ZENTRUM", "ADM": "ADM", "CM": "CM", "DKP": "DKP", "DVU": "DVU", "DIE VIOLETTEN": "DIE VIOLETTEN", "FWD": "FWD", "\u00f6dp": "\u00f6dp", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "RRP": "RRP", "RENTNER": "RENTNER", "Freie Union": "Freie Union", "\u00dcbrige": "\u00dcbrige"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 299, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 299}, "n_stations_flagged": 299, "created_at": "2026-07-02T14:22:54.799870", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.946, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.9, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.862, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.973, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.993, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.542, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 299}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f1d41c3eee2440adaeea33e6e6e045de", "name": "Portugal 1975 parliamentary (overnight portugal_1975_constituent_assembly_district.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 1975, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/SPLKG6 (Lijphart Elections Archive: Portugal; file \"portugal - election75.csv\", datafile id 690302; original STAPE AR75.TXT)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"district_code": "district_code", "CDS_Centro_Democratico_Social": "CDS_Centro_Democratico_Social", "FEC_ML_Frente_Eleitoral_Comunista": "FEC_ML_Frente_Eleitoral_Comunista", "FSP_Frente_Socialista_Popular": "FSP_Frente_Socialista_Popular", "LCI_Liga_Comunista_Internacionalista": "LCI_Liga_Comunista_Internacionalista", "MDP_CDE_Movimento_Democratico_Portugues": "MDP_CDE_Movimento_Democratico_Portugues", "MES_Movimento_Esquerda_Socialista": "MES_Movimento_Esquerda_Socialista", "PCP_Partido_Comunista_Portugues": "PCP_Partido_Comunista_Portugues", "PPD_Partido_Popular_Democratico": "PPD_Partido_Popular_Democratico", "PPM_Partido_Popular_Monarquico": "PPM_Partido_Popular_Monarquico", "PS_Partido_Socialista": "PS_Partido_Socialista", "PUP_Partido_Unidade_Popular": "PUP_Partido_Unidade_Popular", "UDP_Uniao_Democratica_Popular": "UDP_Uniao_Democratica_Popular"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 20}, "n_stations_flagged": 20, "created_at": "2026-07-02T14:22:54.023905", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.855, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.251, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.307, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.233, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 1975, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.251, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.813, "year": 1975, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.545, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 1975, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.382, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.596, "year": 1975, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.265, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 1975, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.459, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 1975, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 1975, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.307, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.307, "year": 1975, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.233, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.233, "year": 1975, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.305, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.305, "year": 1975, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1975, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 1975, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.084, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.084, "year": 1975, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 1975, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "A. Ramalho Eanes", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 45.13, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "PRT", "year": 1976, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 20}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "072bd6f5da6a4f6ca6e707108ea800eb", "name": "Canada 2021 local (overnight yukon_2021_territorial.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionsyukon.ca/sites/default/files/2025-02/2021%20CEO%20Report%20-%20GE%20Administration.30.Jan_.2024.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"district_no": "district_no", "yukon_liberal_party": "yukon_liberal_party", "yukon_ndp": "yukon_ndp", "yukon_party": "yukon_party", "independent": "independent"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 159, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 73, "cast_valid_mismatch": 10, "registered_not_positive": 74, "votes_gt_valid": 159}, "n_stations_flagged": 159, "created_at": "2026-07-02T14:05:45.476548", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.846, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.904, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.749, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 159}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "65db58af98a840bab58946e4cee5e30f", "name": "India 2023 local (overnight india_tripura_2023_assembly_per_constituency.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"constituency_no": "constituency_no", "aifb": "aifb", "aitc": "aitc", "bjp": "bjp", "communist_party_of_india_marxist_leninist_liberation": "communist_party_of_india_marxist_leninist_liberation", "cpi": "cpi", "cpi_m": "cpi_m", "inc": "inc", "independent": "independent", "ipft": "ipft", "nationalist_citizens_party_of_india": "nationalist_citizens_party_of_india", "nota": "nota", "republican_party_of_india_a": "republican_party_of_india_a", "republican_party_of_india_athawale": "republican_party_of_india_athawale", "rsp": "rsp", "tipra_motha": "tipra_motha", "tripura_peoples_party": "tripura_peoples_party", "tsp": "tsp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 60, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 60, "cast_gt_registered": 60, "votes_gt_valid": 60}, "n_stations_flagged": 60, "created_at": "2026-07-02T14:04:46.348143", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.374, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.273, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.283, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.205, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.422, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 60}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "30a1f0ef420b4c4cb9946511c2eac418", "name": "India 2022 local (state legislative assembly) (overnight india_manipur_2022_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ceomanipur.nic.in/ResultSheets/StateLegislativeAssembly/2022/results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ac_no": "ac_no", "nota": "nota", "cand01_votes": "cand01_votes", "cand02_votes": "cand02_votes", "cand03_votes": "cand03_votes", "cand04_votes": "cand04_votes", "cand05_votes": "cand05_votes", "cand06_votes": "cand06_votes", "cand07_votes": "cand07_votes", "cand08_votes": "cand08_votes", "ac_electors": "ac_electors", "winner_votes": "winner_votes"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2887, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 2887, "cast_gt_registered": 2873, "votes_gt_valid": 2887}, "n_stations_flagged": 2887, "created_at": "2026-07-02T14:04:27.913317", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.384, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.291, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.384, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.384, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.291, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.291, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.553, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.764, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.442, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2887}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f5b7b4f11d9240438f29e296ffabe74c", "name": "India 2022 local (overnight india_goa_2022_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/thecont1/india-votes-data/blob/main/data/csv/2022Assembly-GA.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"constituency_no": "constituency_no", "Aam Aadmi Party": "Aam Aadmi Party", "All India Trinamool Congress": "All India Trinamool Congress", "Bharatiya Janata Party": "Bharatiya Janata Party", "Goa Forward Party": "Goa Forward Party", "Goencho Swabhiman Party": "Goencho Swabhiman Party", "Independent": "Independent", "Indian National Congress": "Indian National Congress", "Jai Maha Bharath Party": "Jai Maha Bharath Party", "Maharashtrawadi Gomantak": "Maharashtrawadi Gomantak", "Nationalist Congress Party": "Nationalist Congress Party", "None of the Above": "None of the Above", "Revolutionary Goans Party": "Revolutionary Goans Party", "Sambhaji Brigade Party": "Sambhaji Brigade Party", "Shiv Sena": "Shiv Sena"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 40, "cast_gt_registered": 40, "registered_not_positive": 40}, "n_stations_flagged": 40, "created_at": "2026-07-02T14:04:25.102417", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.384, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.291, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.384, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.384, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.291, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.291, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.553, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.764, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.442, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 40}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b0ebebc39ccf409eab1272da0cdf71e0", "name": "India 2022 local (overnight uttarakhand_2022_vidhan_sabha.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data-analytics.github.io/Election_Data_2022/Uttarakhand.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"constituency_no": "constituency_no", "AAP": "AAP", "ABVP": "ABVP", "AIMEM": "AIMEM", "ASP(K)": "ASP(K)", "BJJP": "BJJP", "BJP": "BJP", "BMP": "BMP", "BSCP": "BSCP", "BSP": "BSP", "BSP(L)": "BSP(L)", "BSS": "BSS", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI(L)": "CPI(L)", "CPM": "CPM", "INC": "INC", "IND": "IND", "JBP": "JBP", "JEP": "JEP", "JMBP": "JMBP", "LKJP": "LKJP", "NBEP": "NBEP", "ND": "ND", "NOTA": "NOTA", "PP": "PP", "PPI(D)": "PPI(D)", "RAP": "RAP", "RJP(S)": "RJP(S)", "RLD": "RLD", "RLP": "RLP", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "RRP": "RRP", "RSD(R)": "RSD(R)", "RUP": "RUP", "RVP": "RVP", "SAD(A)": "SAD(A)", "SBP": "SBP", "SP": "SP", "SSP": "SSP", "SUCI(C)": "SUCI(C)", "UJKP": "UJKP", "UJP": "UJP", "UKD": "UKD", "UKD(D)": "UKD(D)", "UKD(P)": "UKD(P)", "UPP": "UPP", "URM": "URM"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 70, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 70, "cast_gt_registered": 70, "registered_not_positive": 70}, "n_stations_flagged": 70, "created_at": "2026-07-02T14:04:23.150980", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.384, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.291, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.384, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.384, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.291, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.291, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.553, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.764, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.442, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 70}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b86b323f6c0c4ac58b328463801dc06a", "name": "India 2022 local (overnight india_punjab_2022_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thecont1/india-votes-data/main/data/csv/2022Assembly-PB.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"constituency_no": "constituency_no", "AAP": "AAP", "BJP": "BJP", "BSP": "BSP", "INC": "INC", "Independent": "Independent", "LIP": "LIP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "Other": "Other", "PLC": "PLC", "SAD": "SAD", "SAD_Amritsar": "SAD_Amritsar", "SAD_Sanyukt": "SAD_Sanyukt"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 117, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 117, "registered_not_positive": 117, "votes_gt_valid": 117}, "n_stations_flagged": 117, "created_at": "2026-07-02T14:04:20.755112", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.384, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.291, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.384, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.384, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.291, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.291, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.553, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.764, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.442, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5a31481c6bea48ac92130c19d62123b9", "name": "Switzerland 2023 local (overnight switzerland_zurich_2023_kantonsrat.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://opendata.swiss/de/dataset/wahlarchiv-kantonsratswahlen", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Einheit_BFS": "Einheit_BFS", "AL": "AL", "AuFL": "AuFL", "Die_Mitte": "Die_Mitte", "EDU": "EDU", "EVP": "EVP", "FDP": "FDP", "GLP": "GLP", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "PdA": "PdA", "SP": "SP", "SVP": "SVP", "SaPaPo": "SaPaPo", "Stopp": "Stopp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 174, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 174}, "n_stations_flagged": 174, "created_at": "2026-07-02T14:04:18.581225", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.884, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.838, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.559, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 174}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fec77c5e0a7e427cb980c96369bf3665", "name": "Austria 2024 local (overnight austria_styria_2024_landtag_gemeinde.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Austria", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://egov.stmk.gv.at/wahlen/LT2024/index_LT2024.html", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u00d6VP": "\u00d6VP", "SP\u00d6": "SP\u00d6", "FP\u00d6": "FP\u00d6", "GR\u00dcNE": "GR\u00dcNE", "KP\u00d6": "KP\u00d6", "NEOS": "NEOS", "KFG": "KFG", "MFG": "MFG", "DNA": "DNA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 286, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-02T14:04:16.028494", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.802, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.882, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.84, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.762, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.802, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.882, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.542, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.114, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 286}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c0853ede45154df08acca2e99ff0adcd", "name": "Belgium 2024 local (overnight belgium_wallonia_2024_parlement.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Belgium", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://elections.fgov.be/elections-du-9-juin-2024-tableaux-des-resultats (IBZ/SPF Interieur official XLSX: WL_K_2024.xlsx party-votes-per-canton + WL_TauxParticip_2024.xlsx registered/cast/valid per canton)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"party_Chez Nous": "party_Chez Nous", "party_Collectif Citoyen": "party_Collectif Citoyen", "party_D\u00e9FI": "party_D\u00e9FI", "party_ECOLO": "party_ECOLO", "party_LES ENGAG\u00c9S": "party_LES ENGAG\u00c9S", "party_MR": "party_MR", "party_PS": "party_PS", "party_PTB": "party_PTB", "party_RMC": "party_RMC"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 99, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-02T14:04:14.372792", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.873, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.891, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.81, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.794, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.321, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.08, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.031, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.031, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.969, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 99}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5cd95030ab414879a9c3f39f49f873ca", "name": "Belgium 2024 local (overnight belgium_2024_vlaams_parlement_per_municipality.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Belgium", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://verkiezingsresultaten.belgium.be/xml/2024_ParlementFlanders.xml", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"VLAAMS BELANG": "VLAAMS BELANG", "open vld": "open vld", "Volt Europa": "Volt Europa", "PVDA": "PVDA", "Vooruit": "Vooruit", "N-VA": "N-VA", "GROEN": "GROEN", "CD&V": "CD&V", "Voor U": "Voor U", "DierAnimal": "DierAnimal", "BBB": "BBB", "Team Fouad Ahidar": "Team Fouad Ahidar", "Vooruit_brussels": "Vooruit_brussels", "UF": "UF", "PARTIJ vr de BOMEN": "PARTIJ vr de BOMEN", "L99": "L99"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 319, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 319, "cast_gt_registered": 319}, "n_stations_flagged": 319, "created_at": "2026-07-02T14:04:12.219307", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.873, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.891, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.81, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.794, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.321, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.08, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.031, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.031, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.969, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 319}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c3a96a9db45d41c7b3469433d5e1951c", "name": "Italy 2023 local (overnight italy_lazio_2023_regional_comune.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://dait.interno.gov.it/documenti/opendata/regionali/regionali-20230212.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cand_Bianchi": "cand_Bianchi", "cand_DAmato": "cand_DAmato", "cand_Pecorilli": "cand_Pecorilli", "cand_Rinaldi": "cand_Rinaldi", "cand_Rocca": "cand_Rocca", "lista_AZIONE_ITALIA_VIVA": "lista_AZIONE_ITALIA_VIVA", "lista_DEMOS_DEMOCRAZIA_SOLIDALE": "lista_DEMOS_DEMOCRAZIA_SOLIDALE", "lista_EUROPA_RADICALI_ITALIANI_VOLT": "lista_EUROPA_RADICALI_ITALIANI_VOLT", "lista_FORZA_ITALIA": "lista_FORZA_ITALIA", "lista_FRATELLI_D_ITALIA": "lista_FRATELLI_D_ITALIA", "lista_LEGA": "lista_LEGA", "lista_LISTA_CIVICA_D_AMATO_PRESIDENTE": "lista_LISTA_CIVICA_D_AMATO_PRESIDENTE", "lista_LISTA_CIVICA_FRANCESCO_ROCCA_PRESIDENTE": "lista_LISTA_CIVICA_FRANCESCO_ROCCA_PRESIDENTE", "lista_MOVIMENTO_5_STELLE": "lista_MOVIMENTO_5_STELLE", "lista_NOI_MODERATI_RINASCIMENTO_SGARBI": "lista_NOI_MODERATI_RINASCIMENTO_SGARBI", "lista_PARTITO_COMUNISTA_ITALIANO": "lista_PARTITO_COMUNISTA_ITALIANO", "lista_PARTITO_DEMOCRATICO": "lista_PARTITO_DEMOCRATICO", "lista_PARTITO_SOCIALISTA_ITALIANO": "lista_PARTITO_SOCIALISTA_ITALIANO", "lista_POLO_PROGRESSISTA_DI_SINISTRA_ECOLOGISTA": "lista_POLO_PROGRESSISTA_DI_SINISTRA_ECOLOGISTA", "lista_UNIONE_DI_CENTRO": "lista_UNIONE_DI_CENTRO", "lista_UNIONE_POPOLARE": "lista_UNIONE_POPOLARE", "lista_VERDI_E_SINISTRA_EUROPA_VERDE_POSSIBILE": "lista_VERDI_E_SINISTRA_EUROPA_VERDE_POSSIBILE"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 378, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 378, "cast_valid_mismatch": 359}, "n_stations_flagged": 378, "created_at": "2026-07-02T14:04:09.482977", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.908, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.806, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.727, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 378}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5110d670c1ce4db3b9f3460f7433b966", "name": "Italy 2023 local (overnight italy_lombardy_2023_regionali_comune.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://dait.interno.gov.it/documenti/opendata/regionali/regionali-20230212.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cand_Brichetto_Arnaboldi": "cand_Brichetto_Arnaboldi", "cand_Fontana": "cand_Fontana", "cand_Ghidorzi": "cand_Ghidorzi", "cand_Majorino": "cand_Majorino"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1504, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-02T14:04:02.515857", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.908, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.806, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.727, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1504}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a428716e9edb42d58c42da9cf2cd3cdc", "name": "Italy 2020 local (overnight italy_valle_aosta_2020_regional_per_polo.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2020, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.regione.vda.it/amministrazione/Elezioni/Dati_e_risultati/elezioni/Mobile/VotiLista_i.aspx?idele=142&ord=1&setcar=n&idcom={201..208}&idsez=0", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ALLIANCE_VALDOTAINE_STELLA_ALPINA_ITALIA_VIVA": "ALLIANCE_VALDOTAINE_STELLA_ALPINA_ITALIA_VIVA", "PROGETTO_CIVICO_PROGRESSISTA": "PROGETTO_CIVICO_PROGRESSISTA", "VDA_LIBRA_PARTITO_ANIMALISTA_ITALIANO": "VDA_LIBRA_PARTITO_ANIMALISTA_ITALIANO", "RINASCIMENTO_VALLE_DAOSTA_RENAISSANCE_VALLEE_DAOSTE": "RINASCIMENTO_VALLE_DAOSTA_RENAISSANCE_VALLEE_DAOSTE", "CENTRO_DESTRA_VALLE_DAOSTA": "CENTRO_DESTRA_VALLE_DAOSTA", "PAS": "PAS", "UNION_VALDOTAINE": "UNION_VALDOTAINE", "LEGA_SALVINI_VALLEE_DAOSTE": "LEGA_SALVINI_VALLEE_DAOSTE", "POUR_LAUTONOMIE_PER_LAUTONOMIA": "POUR_LAUTONOMIE_PER_LAUTONOMIA", "MOVIMENTO_CINQUE_STELLE": "MOVIMENTO_CINQUE_STELLE", "VALLE_DAOSTA_FUTURA": "VALLE_DAOSTA_FUTURA", "VALLEE_DAOSTE_UNIE": "VALLEE_DAOSTE_UNIE"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-01T21:06:58.606953", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.904, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.963, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.857, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.774, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.621, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.796, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.164, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.164, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b0d307bf4c0a4fa089f58e4c146dda72", "name": "United States 2022 local (overnight us_massachusetts_2022_legislature.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionstats.state.ma.us/ (PD43+ official MA Secretary of the Commonwealth)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"all_others": "all_others", "democratic": "democratic", "green_rainbow": "green_rainbow", "republican": "republican", "unenrolled": "unenrolled", "workers_party": "workers_party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4780, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 4764, "registered_not_positive": 4780}, "n_stations_flagged": 4780, "created_at": "2026-07-01T21:06:44.468731", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4780}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1d4ffd2fee0d423896685c26b5f2741d", "name": "United States 2023 local (us state legislature) (overnight us_new_jersey_2023_legislature.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://nj.gov/state/elections/election-information-2023.shtml", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"valid_senate": "valid_senate", "LD01_SEN_R_MichaelLTestaJr": "LD01_SEN_R_MichaelLTestaJr", "LD01_SEN_D_CharlesRLaspata": "LD01_SEN_D_CharlesRLaspata", "LD01_GA_R_ErikSimonsen": "LD01_GA_R_ErikSimonsen", "LD01_GA_R_AntwanMcClellan": "LD01_GA_R_AntwanMcClellan", "LD01_GA_D_DamitaWhiteMorris": "LD01_GA_D_DamitaWhiteMorris", "LD01_GA_D_EddieLBonner": "LD01_GA_D_EddieLBonner", "LD02_SEN_R_VincePolistina": "LD02_SEN_R_VincePolistina", "LD02_SEN_D_CarenFitzpatrick": "LD02_SEN_D_CarenFitzpatrick", "LD02_SEN_Libe_ShawnPeck": "LD02_SEN_Libe_ShawnPeck", "LD02_GA_R_DonGuardian": "LD02_GA_R_DonGuardian", "LD02_GA_R_ClaireSwift": "LD02_GA_R_ClaireSwift", "LD02_GA_D_ElizabethLisaBender": "LD02_GA_D_ElizabethLisaBender", "LD02_GA_D_AlphonsoHarrell": "LD02_GA_D_AlphonsoHarrell", "LD03_SEN_D_JohnJBurzichelli": "LD03_SEN_D_JohnJBurzichelli", "LD03_SEN_R_EdwardDurr": "LD03_SEN_R_EdwardDurr", "LD03_GA_D_HeatherSimmons": "LD03_GA_D_HeatherSimmons", "LD03_GA_D_DaveBaileyJr": "LD03_GA_D_DaveBaileyJr", "LD03_GA_R_BethanneMcCarthyPatrick": "LD03_GA_R_BethanneMcCarthyPatrick", "LD03_GA_R_ThomasJTedescoJr": "LD03_GA_R_ThomasJTedescoJr", "LD04_SEN_D_PaulDMoriarty": "LD04_SEN_D_PaulDMoriarty", "LD04_SEN_R_ChristopherWDelBorrello": "LD04_SEN_R_ChristopherWDelBorrello", "LD04_SEN_Sout_GiuseppeCostanzoConservatives": "LD04_SEN_Sout_GiuseppeCostanzoConservatives", "LD04_GA_D_DanHutchison": "LD04_GA_D_DanHutchison", "LD04_GA_D_CodyDMiller": "LD04_GA_D_CodyDMiller", "LD04_GA_R_MatthewPWalker": "LD04_GA_R_MatthewPWalker", "LD04_GA_R_AmandaEsposito": "LD04_GA_R_AmandaEsposito", "LD04_GA_Sout_MaureenDukesPenroseConservatives": "LD04_GA_Sout_MaureenDukesPenroseConservatives", "LD05_SEN_D_NilsaCruzPerez": "LD05_SEN_D_NilsaCruzPerez", "LD05_SEN_R_ClydeECook": "LD05_SEN_R_ClydeECook", "LD05_SEN_Peac_MohammadKabirRightsTranquility": "LD05_SEN_Peac_MohammadKabirRightsTranquility", "LD05_GA_D_WilliamFMoenJr": "LD05_GA_D_WilliamFMoenJr", "LD05_GA_D_WilliamWSpearman": "LD05_GA_D_WilliamWSpearman", "LD05_GA_R_JoeMiller": "LD05_GA_R_JoeMiller", "LD05_GA_R_YalindaPagan": "LD05_GA_R_YalindaPagan", "LD06_SEN_D_JamesBeach": "LD06_SEN_D_JamesBeach", "LD06_SEN_R_MarkDoogan": "LD06_SEN_R_MarkDoogan", "LD06_GA_D_LouisDGreenwald": "LD06_GA_D_LouisDGreenwald", "LD06_GA_D_PamelaRLampitt": "LD06_GA_D_PamelaRLampitt", "LD06_GA_R_DanielleMBarry": "LD06_GA_R_DanielleMBarry", "LD06_GA_R_BrianMcRory": "LD06_GA_R_BrianMcRory", "LD07_SEN_D_TroySingleton": "LD07_SEN_D_TroySingleton", "LD07_SEN_R_JamesAFazzone": "LD07_SEN_R_JamesAFazzone", "LD07_GA_D_HerbertCConawayJr": "LD07_GA_D_HerbertCConawayJr", "LD07_GA_D_CarolMurphy": "LD07_GA_D_CarolMurphy", "LD07_GA_R_DouglasFDillon": "LD07_GA_R_DouglasFDillon", "LD07_GA_R_EileenBleistine": "LD07_GA_R_EileenBleistine", "LD08_SEN_R_LathamTiver": "LD08_SEN_R_LathamTiver", "LD08_SEN_D_GayeBurton": "LD08_SEN_D_GayeBurton", "LD08_GA_R_MichaelTorrissiJr": "LD08_GA_R_MichaelTorrissiJr", "LD08_GA_D_AndreaKatz": "LD08_GA_D_AndreaKatz", "LD08_GA_D_AnthonyAngelozzi": "LD08_GA_D_AnthonyAngelozzi", "LD08_GA_R_BrandonEUmba": "LD08_GA_R_BrandonEUmba", "LD09_SEN_R_CarmenFAmatoJr": "LD09_SEN_R_CarmenFAmatoJr", "LD09_SEN_D_GabrielFranco": "LD09_SEN_D_GabrielFranco", "LD09_GA_R_BrianERumpf": "LD09_GA_R_BrianERumpf", "LD09_GA_R_GregoryEMyhre": "LD09_GA_R_GregoryEMyhre", "LD09_GA_D_JosephAtura": "LD09_GA_D_JosephAtura", "LD09_GA_D_SarahSallyCollins": "LD09_GA_D_SarahSallyCollins", "LD09_GA_Gree_BarryBendar": "LD09_GA_Gree_BarryBendar", "LD10_SEN_R_JimHolzapfel": "LD10_SEN_R_JimHolzapfel", "LD10_SEN_D_JeffJHorn": "LD10_SEN_D_JeffJHorn", "LD10_GA_R_GregoryPMcGuckin": "LD10_GA_R_GregoryPMcGuckin", "LD10_GA_R_PaulKanitra": "LD10_GA_R_PaulKanitra", "LD10_GA_D_JohnLaMacchia": "LD10_GA_D_JohnLaMacchia", "LD10_GA_D_EmmaMammano": "LD10_GA_D_EmmaMammano", "LD11_SEN_D_VinGopal": "LD11_SEN_D_VinGopal", "LD11_SEN_R_StephenDnistrian": "LD11_SEN_R_StephenDnistrian", "LD11_SEN_NJPa_KarenZaletel": "LD11_SEN_NJPa_KarenZaletel", "LD11_GA_D_MargieMDonlon": "LD11_GA_D_MargieMDonlon", "LD11_GA_D_LuAnneMPeterpaul": "LD11_GA_D_LuAnneMPeterpaul", "LD11_GA_R_MarilynPiperno": "LD11_GA_R_MarilynPiperno", "LD11_GA_R_KimEulner": "LD11_GA_R_KimEulner", "LD12_SEN_R_OwenHenry": "LD12_SEN_R_OwenHenry", "LD12_SEN_D_BrandonARose": "LD12_SEN_D_BrandonARose", "LD12_SEN_Resu_NinaJochnowitz": "LD12_SEN_Resu_NinaJochnowitz", "LD12_GA_R_RobertDClifton": "LD12_GA_R_RobertDClifton", "LD12_GA_R_AlexSauickie": "LD12_GA_R_AlexSauickie", "LD12_GA_D_PaulSarti": "LD12_GA_D_PaulSarti", "LD12_GA_D_RayaArbiol": "LD12_GA_D_RayaArbiol", "LD13_SEN_R_DeclanOScanlon": "LD13_SEN_R_DeclanOScanlon", "LD13_SEN_D_LucilleLosapio": "LD13_SEN_D_LucilleLosapio", "LD13_GA_R_GerardScharfenberger": "LD13_GA_R_GerardScharfenberger", "LD13_GA_R_VictoriaAFlynn": "LD13_GA_R_VictoriaAFlynn", "LD13_GA_D_DanielleMastropiero": "LD13_GA_D_DanielleMastropiero", "LD13_GA_D_PaulEschelbach": "LD13_GA_D_PaulEschelbach", "LD13_GA_Libe_JohnMorrison": "LD13_GA_Libe_JohnMorrison", "LD14_SEN_D_LindaRGreenstein": "LD14_SEN_D_LindaRGreenstein", "LD14_SEN_R_PatriciaPatJohnson": "LD14_SEN_R_PatriciaPatJohnson", "LD14_GA_D_WaynePDeAngelo": "LD14_GA_D_WaynePDeAngelo", "LD14_GA_D_TennilleRMcCoy": "LD14_GA_D_TennilleRMcCoy", "LD14_GA_R_AdamJElias": "LD14_GA_R_AdamJElias", "LD14_GA_R_SkyeGilmartin": "LD14_GA_R_SkyeGilmartin", "LD15_SEN_D_ShirleyTurner": "LD15_SEN_D_ShirleyTurner", "LD15_SEN_R_RogerRLocandro": "LD15_SEN_R_RogerRLocandro", "LD15_GA_D_VerlinaReynoldsJackson": "LD15_GA_D_VerlinaReynoldsJackson", "LD15_GA_D_AnthonySVerrelli": "LD15_GA_D_AnthonySVerrelli", "LD15_GA_R_MichelFHurtado": "LD15_GA_R_MichelFHurtado", "LD16_SEN_D_AndrewZwicker": "LD16_SEN_D_AndrewZwicker", "LD16_SEN_R_MichaelPappas": "LD16_SEN_R_MichaelPappas", "LD16_SEN_Libe_RichardJByrne": "LD16_SEN_Libe_RichardJByrne", "LD16_GA_D_RoyFreiman": "LD16_GA_D_RoyFreiman", "LD16_GA_D_MitchelleDrulis": "LD16_GA_D_MitchelleDrulis", "LD16_GA_R_RossTraphagen": "LD16_GA_R_RossTraphagen", "LD16_GA_R_GraceZhang": "LD16_GA_R_GraceZhang", "LD17_SEN_D_BobSmith": "LD17_SEN_D_BobSmith", "LD17_SEN_JrRe_WilliamPMikita": "LD17_SEN_JrRe_WilliamPMikita", "LD17_GA_D_JosephDanielsen": "LD17_GA_D_JosephDanielsen", "LD17_GA_D_KevinPEgan": "LD17_GA_D_KevinPEgan", "LD17_GA_R_SusanHucko": "LD17_GA_R_SusanHucko", "LD17_GA_R_DhimantGPatel": "LD17_GA_R_DhimantGPatel", "LD18_SEN_D_PatrickJDiegnanJr": "LD18_SEN_D_PatrickJDiegnanJr", "LD18_SEN_R_NealShah": "LD18_SEN_R_NealShah", "LD18_GA_D_RobertJKarabinchak": "LD18_GA_D_RobertJKarabinchak", "LD18_GA_D_SterleySStanley": "LD18_GA_D_SterleySStanley", "LD18_GA_R_TeresaAHutchison": "LD18_GA_R_TeresaAHutchison", "LD18_GA_R_JosephCWolak": "LD18_GA_R_JosephCWolak", "LD19_SEN_D_JosephFVitale": "LD19_SEN_D_JosephFVitale", "LD19_SEN_R_MariaGarcia": "LD19_SEN_R_MariaGarcia", "LD19_GA_D_CraigJCoughlin": "LD19_GA_D_CraigJCoughlin", "LD19_GA_D_YvonneLopez": "LD19_GA_D_YvonneLopez", "LD19_GA_R_SamRaval": "LD19_GA_R_SamRaval", "LD19_GA_R_MarilynColon": "LD19_GA_R_MarilynColon", "LD19_GA_Libe_DavidDiez": "LD19_GA_Libe_DavidDiez", "LD20_SEN_D_JosephCryan": "LD20_SEN_D_JosephCryan", "LD20_SEN_R_CarmenBucco": "LD20_SEN_R_CarmenBucco", "LD20_GA_D_AnnetteQuijano": "LD20_GA_D_AnnetteQuijano", "LD20_GA_D_ReginaldWAtkins": "LD20_GA_D_ReginaldWAtkins", "LD20_GA_R_RamonHernandez": "LD20_GA_R_RamonHernandez", "LD21_SEN_R_JonBramnick": "LD21_SEN_R_JonBramnick", "LD21_SEN_D_MattMarino": "LD21_SEN_D_MattMarino", "LD21_GA_R_NancyMunoz": "LD21_GA_R_NancyMunoz", "LD21_GA_R_MicheleMatsikoudis": "LD21_GA_R_MicheleMatsikoudis", "LD21_GA_D_ElizabethGraner": "LD21_GA_D_ElizabethGraner", "LD21_GA_D_ChrisWeber": "LD21_GA_D_ChrisWeber", "LD22_SEN_D_NicholasPScutari": "LD22_SEN_D_NicholasPScutari", "LD22_SEN_R_WilliamHMichelson": "LD22_SEN_R_WilliamHMichelson", "LD22_GA_D_JamesJKennedy": "LD22_GA_D_JamesJKennedy", "LD22_GA_D_LindaSCarter": "LD22_GA_D_LindaSCarter", "LD22_GA_R_LisaMFabrizio": "LD22_GA_R_LisaMFabrizio", "LD22_GA_R_PatriciaQuattrocchi": "LD22_GA_R_PatriciaQuattrocchi", "LD23_SEN_R_DouglasSteinhardt": "LD23_SEN_R_DouglasSteinhardt", "LD23_SEN_D_DeniseKing": "LD23_SEN_D_DeniseKing", "LD23_GA_R_JohnDiMaio": "LD23_GA_R_JohnDiMaio", "LD23_GA_R_ErikPeterson": "LD23_GA_R_ErikPeterson", "LD23_GA_D_TylerPowell": "LD23_GA_D_TylerPowell", "LD23_GA_D_GuyCitron": "LD23_GA_D_GuyCitron", "LD24_SEN_R_FParkerSpace": "LD24_SEN_R_FParkerSpace", "LD24_SEN_D_EdmundKhanoo": "LD24_SEN_D_EdmundKhanoo", "LD24_GA_R_DawnFantasia": "LD24_GA_R_DawnFantasia", "LD24_GA_R_MichaelInganamort": "LD24_GA_R_MichaelInganamort", "LD24_GA_D_BaramdaiAliciaSharma": "LD24_GA_D_BaramdaiAliciaSharma", "LD24_GA_Corr_VeronicaFernandezEndThe": "LD24_GA_Corr_VeronicaFernandezEndThe", "LD25_SEN_R_AnthonyMBucco": "LD25_SEN_R_AnthonyMBucco", "LD25_SEN_D_ChristineClarke": "LD25_SEN_D_ChristineClarke", "LD25_GA_R_AuraKDunn": "LD25_GA_R_AuraKDunn", "LD25_GA_R_ChristianEBarranco": "LD25_GA_R_ChristianEBarranco", "LD25_GA_D_JonathanTorres": "LD25_GA_D_JonathanTorres", "LD25_GA_D_DianeSalvatore": "LD25_GA_D_DianeSalvatore", "LD26_SEN_R_JosephPennacchio": "LD26_SEN_R_JosephPennacchio", "LD26_SEN_D_JoanWaks": "LD26_SEN_D_JoanWaks", "LD26_GA_R_JayWebber": "LD26_GA_R_JayWebber", "LD26_GA_R_BrianBergen": "LD26_GA_R_BrianBergen", "LD26_GA_D_WalterMielarczyk": "LD26_GA_D_WalterMielarczyk", "LD26_GA_D_JohnVonAchen": "LD26_GA_D_JohnVonAchen", "LD27_SEN_D_JohnFMcKeon": "LD27_SEN_D_JohnFMcKeon", "LD27_SEN_R_MichaelDByrne": "LD27_SEN_R_MichaelDByrne", "LD27_GA_D_RosyBagolie": "LD27_GA_D_RosyBagolie", "LD27_GA_D_AlixonCollazosGill": "LD27_GA_D_AlixonCollazosGill", "LD27_GA_R_IreneDeVita": "LD27_GA_R_IreneDeVita", "LD27_GA_R_MichaelGMeccaJr": "LD27_GA_R_MichaelGMeccaJr", "LD28_SEN_D_ReneeCBurgess": "LD28_SEN_D_ReneeCBurgess", "LD28_GA_D_CleopatraGTucker": "LD28_GA_D_CleopatraGTucker", "LD28_GA_D_GarnetRHall": "LD28_GA_D_GarnetRHall", "LD28_GA_R_JoyFreeman": "LD28_GA_R_JoyFreeman", "LD28_GA_R_WillieSJetti": "LD28_GA_R_WillieSJetti", "LD29_SEN_D_MTeresaRuiz": "LD29_SEN_D_MTeresaRuiz", "LD29_SEN_R_MaritzaMathews": "LD29_SEN_R_MaritzaMathews", "LD29_SEN_Labo_PabloOlivera": "LD29_SEN_Labo_PabloOlivera", "LD29_GA_D_ElianaPintorMarin": "LD29_GA_D_ElianaPintorMarin", "LD29_GA_D_ShaniqueSpeight": "LD29_GA_D_ShaniqueSpeight", "LD29_GA_R_NobleMilton": "LD29_GA_R_NobleMilton", "LD29_GA_R_OrlandoMendez": "LD29_GA_R_OrlandoMendez", "LD30_SEN_R_RobertWSinger": "LD30_SEN_R_RobertWSinger", "LD30_SEN_D_StephenDobbins": "LD30_SEN_D_StephenDobbins", "LD30_GA_R_SeanTKean": "LD30_GA_R_SeanTKean", "LD30_GA_D_AlexanderAviSchnall": "LD30_GA_D_AlexanderAviSchnall", "LD30_GA_R_EdwardHThomson": "LD30_GA_R_EdwardHThomson", "LD30_GA_D_SalvatoreSalFrascino": "LD30_GA_D_SalvatoreSalFrascino", "LD31_SEN_D_AngelaVMcKnight": "LD31_SEN_D_AngelaVMcKnight", "LD31_SEN_R_LuisSoto": "LD31_SEN_R_LuisSoto", "LD31_GA_D_WilliamBSampson": "LD31_GA_D_WilliamBSampson", "LD31_GA_D_BarbaraMcCannStamato": "LD31_GA_D_BarbaraMcCannStamato", "LD31_GA_R_SydneyJFerreira": "LD31_GA_R_SydneyJFerreira", "LD31_GA_R_AngeliqueMDiaz": "LD31_GA_R_AngeliqueMDiaz", "LD31_GA_Valu_MaryJaneDesmondLeadershipExperience": "LD31_GA_Valu_MaryJaneDesmondLeadershipExperience", "LD31_GA_Valu_NoemiVelazquezLeadershipExperience": "LD31_GA_Valu_NoemiVelazquezLeadershipExperience", "LD32_SEN_D_RajMukherji": "LD32_SEN_D_RajMukherji", "LD32_SEN_R_IlyasMohammed": "LD32_SEN_R_IlyasMohammed", "LD32_GA_D_JohnAllen": "LD32_GA_D_JohnAllen", "LD32_GA_D_JessicaRamirez": "LD32_GA_D_JessicaRamirez", "LD32_GA_R_RobertRamos": "LD32_GA_R_RobertRamos", "LD33_SEN_D_BrianPStack": "LD33_SEN_D_BrianPStack", "LD33_SEN_Work_JoanneKunianskySocialist": "LD33_SEN_Work_JoanneKunianskySocialist", "LD33_GA_D_JullioMarenco": "LD33_GA_D_JullioMarenco", "LD33_GA_D_GabrielRodriguez": "LD33_GA_D_GabrielRodriguez", "LD33_GA_Work_LeaShermanSocialist": "LD33_GA_Work_LeaShermanSocialist", "LD34_SEN_D_BritneeNTimberlake": "LD34_SEN_D_BritneeNTimberlake", "LD34_SEN_R_JosephBelnome": "LD34_SEN_R_JosephBelnome", "LD34_GA_D_CarmenMorales": "LD34_GA_D_CarmenMorales", "LD34_GA_D_MichaelVenezia": "LD34_GA_D_MichaelVenezia", "LD34_GA_R_ClenardHChildressJr": "LD34_GA_R_ClenardHChildressJr", "LD34_GA_R_JamesMcGuire": "LD34_GA_R_JamesMcGuire", "LD35_SEN_D_NelidaPou": "LD35_SEN_D_NelidaPou", "LD35_SEN_R_ChristopherFaustino": "LD35_SEN_R_ChristopherFaustino", "LD35_GA_D_ShavondaESumter": "LD35_GA_D_ShavondaESumter", "LD35_GA_D_BenjieEWimberly": "LD35_GA_D_BenjieEWimberly", "LD36_SEN_D_PaulASarlo": "LD36_SEN_D_PaulASarlo", "LD36_SEN_R_ChrisAuriemma": "LD36_SEN_R_ChrisAuriemma", "LD36_GA_D_GarySchaer": "LD36_GA_D_GarySchaer", "LD36_GA_D_ClintonCalabrese": "LD36_GA_D_ClintonCalabrese", "LD36_GA_R_CraigAuriemma": "LD36_GA_R_CraigAuriemma", "LD36_GA_R_JosephViso": "LD36_GA_R_JosephViso", "LD37_SEN_D_GordonMJohnson": "LD37_SEN_D_GordonMJohnson", "LD37_SEN_R_DiedreGPaul": "LD37_SEN_R_DiedreGPaul", "LD37_GA_D_ShamaAHaider": "LD37_GA_D_ShamaAHaider", "LD37_GA_D_EllenJPark": "LD37_GA_D_EllenJPark", "LD37_GA_R_RobertBedoya": "LD37_GA_R_RobertBedoya", "LD37_GA_R_KatherineALebovics": "LD37_GA_R_KatherineALebovics", "LD38_SEN_D_JosephALagana": "LD38_SEN_D_JosephALagana", "LD38_SEN_R_MichelineBAttieh": "LD38_SEN_R_MichelineBAttieh", "LD38_GA_D_LisaSwain": "LD38_GA_D_LisaSwain", "LD38_GA_D_ChrisTully": "LD38_GA_D_ChrisTully", "LD38_GA_R_GailHorton": "LD38_GA_R_GailHorton", "LD38_GA_R_BarryCWilkes": "LD38_GA_R_BarryCWilkes", "LD39_SEN_R_HollySchepisi": "LD39_SEN_R_HollySchepisi", "LD39_SEN_D_JodiAMurphy": "LD39_SEN_D_JodiAMurphy", "LD39_GA_R_RobertJAuth": "LD39_GA_R_RobertJAuth", "LD39_GA_R_JohnVAzzaritiJr": "LD39_GA_R_JohnVAzzaritiJr", "LD39_GA_D_DamonJEnglese": "LD39_GA_D_DamonJEnglese", "LD39_GA_D_JohnFVitale": "LD39_GA_D_JohnFVitale", "LD40_SEN_R_KristinMCorrado": "LD40_SEN_R_KristinMCorrado", "LD40_SEN_D_JenniferEhrentraut": "LD40_SEN_D_JenniferEhrentraut", "LD40_GA_R_ChristopherPDePhillips": "LD40_GA_R_ChristopherPDePhillips", "LD40_GA_R_AlBarlas": "LD40_GA_R_AlBarlas", "LD40_GA_D_GiovannaIrizarry": "LD40_GA_D_GiovannaIrizarry", "LD40_GA_D_JenniferMarrinan": "LD40_GA_D_JenniferMarrinan"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 605, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 604, "registered_not_positive": 605, "cast_gt_registered": 604}, "n_stations_flagged": 605, "created_at": "2026-07-01T21:06:40.379648", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.857, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.789, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.44, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.61, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 605}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6337e7c5e94f467bbeb2f9c4a1de9489", "name": "South Africa 2024 local (provincial legislature) (overnight south_africa_2024_western_cape_provincial_per_vd.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.elections.org.za/home/NPEPublicReports/1335/Downloadable%20Results/Provincial.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ACTIONSA": "ACTIONSA", "AFRICAN_CHRISTIAN_DEMOCRATIC_PARTY": "AFRICAN_CHRISTIAN_DEMOCRATIC_PARTY", "AFRICAN_INDEPENDENT_CONGRESS": "AFRICAN_INDEPENDENT_CONGRESS", "AFRICAN_NATIONAL_CONGRESS": "AFRICAN_NATIONAL_CONGRESS", "AFRICAN_TRANSFORMATION_MOVEMENT": "AFRICAN_TRANSFORMATION_MOVEMENT", "AFRICA_RESTORATION_ALLIANCE": "AFRICA_RESTORATION_ALLIANCE", "ALLIANCE_OF_CITIZENS_FOR_CHANGE": "ALLIANCE_OF_CITIZENS_FOR_CHANGE", "ALLIED_MOVEMENT_FOR_CHANGE": "ALLIED_MOVEMENT_FOR_CHANGE", "AL_JAMA_AH": "AL_JAMA_AH", "ARISE_SOUTH_AFRICA": "ARISE_SOUTH_AFRICA", "AZANIA_PEACEFUL_REVOLUTION": "AZANIA_PEACEFUL_REVOLUTION", "BUILD_ONE_SOUTH_AFRICA_WITH_MMUSI_MAIMANE": "BUILD_ONE_SOUTH_AFRICA_WITH_MMUSI_MAIMANE", "CONGRESS_OF_THE_PEOPLE": "CONGRESS_OF_THE_PEOPLE", "DEMOCRATIC_ALLIANCE": "DEMOCRATIC_ALLIANCE", "ECONOMIC_FREEDOM_FIGHTERS": "ECONOMIC_FREEDOM_FIGHTERS", "GOOD": "GOOD", "INKATHA_FREEDOM_PARTY": "INKATHA_FREEDOM_PARTY", "LAND_PARTY": "LAND_PARTY", "NATIONAL_COLOURED_CONGRESS": "NATIONAL_COLOURED_CONGRESS", "OPERATION_DUDULA": "OPERATION_DUDULA", "PAN_AFRICANIST_CONGRESS_OF_AZANIA": "PAN_AFRICANIST_CONGRESS_OF_AZANIA", "PATRIOTIC_ALLIANCE": "PATRIOTIC_ALLIANCE", "PEOPLE_S_MOVEMENT_FOR_CHANGE": "PEOPLE_S_MOVEMENT_FOR_CHANGE", "REFERENDUM_PARTY": "REFERENDUM_PARTY", "RISE_MZANSI": "RISE_MZANSI", "SIZWE_UMMAH_NATION": "SIZWE_UMMAH_NATION", "UMKHONTO_WESIZWE": "UMKHONTO_WESIZWE", "UNITED_DEMOCRATIC_MOVEMENT": "UNITED_DEMOCRATIC_MOVEMENT", "VRYHEIDSFRONT_PLUS": "VRYHEIDSFRONT_PLUS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1572, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-07-01T21:06:32.221989", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.695, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.351, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.734, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.648, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.695, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.351, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.046, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.391, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.648, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.517, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1572}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "87817ef1cda642c79c58ec2a3092ff70", "name": "South Africa 2024 local (overnight south_africa_2024_kwazulu_natal_provincial_per_vd.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.elections.org.za/home/NPEPublicReports/1335/Downloadable%20Results/Provincial.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ABANTU BATHO CONGRESS": "ABANTU BATHO CONGRESS", "ACTIONSA": "ACTIONSA", "AFRICA RESTORATION ALLIANCE": "AFRICA RESTORATION ALLIANCE", "AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY": "AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY", "AFRICAN INDEPENDENT CONGRESS": "AFRICAN INDEPENDENT CONGRESS", "AFRICAN MOVEMENT CONGRESS": "AFRICAN MOVEMENT CONGRESS", "AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS": "AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS", "AFRICAN PEOPLE FIRST": "AFRICAN PEOPLE FIRST", "AFRICAN PEOPLE'S MOVEMENT": "AFRICAN PEOPLE'S MOVEMENT", "AFRICAN TRANSFORMATION MOVEMENT": "AFRICAN TRANSFORMATION MOVEMENT", "AL JAMA-AH": "AL JAMA-AH", "ALL CITIZENS PARTY": "ALL CITIZENS PARTY", "ALLIED MOVEMENT FOR CHANGE": "ALLIED MOVEMENT FOR CHANGE", "ARISE SOUTH AFRICA": "ARISE SOUTH AFRICA", "BUILD ONE SOUTH AFRICA WITH MMUSI MAIMANE": "BUILD ONE SOUTH AFRICA WITH MMUSI MAIMANE", "CONGRESS OF THE PEOPLE": "CONGRESS OF THE PEOPLE", "DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE": "DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE", "DEMOCRATIC LIBERAL CONGRESS": "DEMOCRATIC LIBERAL CONGRESS", "ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS": "ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS", "ECONOMIC LIBERATORS FORUM SOUTH AFRICA": "ECONOMIC LIBERATORS FORUM SOUTH AFRICA", "GOOD": "GOOD", "INDEPENDENT": "INDEPENDENT", "INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY": "INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY", "JUSTICE AND EMPLOYMENT PARTY": "JUSTICE AND EMPLOYMENT PARTY", "NATIONAL FREEDOM PARTY": "NATIONAL FREEDOM PARTY", "PAN AFRICANIST CONGRESS OF AZANIA": "PAN AFRICANIST CONGRESS OF AZANIA", "PATRIOTIC ALLIANCE": "PATRIOTIC ALLIANCE", "PEOPLE'S FREEDOM PARTY": "PEOPLE'S FREEDOM PARTY", "RISE MZANSI": "RISE MZANSI", "SIZWE UMMAH NATION": "SIZWE UMMAH NATION", "UMKHONTO WESIZWE": "UMKHONTO WESIZWE", "UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT": "UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT", "VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS": "VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4974, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-07-01T21:06:09.210049", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.695, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.351, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.734, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.648, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.695, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.351, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.046, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.391, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.648, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.517, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4974}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0bbbdc20c794470aaa4508a28cf3320c", "name": "Argentina 2023 local (provincial governor) (overnight argentina_salta_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electoralsalta.gob.ar/elecciones/escrutinio/escrutinio-definitivo-generales-2023.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"mesa": "mesa", "POLITICA OBRERA": "POLITICA OBRERA", "PARTIDO DE TRABAJADORES POR EL SOCIALISMO": "PARTIDO DE TRABAJADORES POR EL SOCIALISMO", "MOVIMIENTO AL SOCIALISMO": "MOVIMIENTO AL SOCIALISMO", "FRENTE AVANCEMOS": "FRENTE AVANCEMOS", "ENTRE TODOS": "ENTRE TODOS", "FRENTE SALTA AVANZA CON VOS": "FRENTE SALTA AVANZA CON VOS", "SALTA PARA TODOS - CALIVA GOBERNADORA": "SALTA PARA TODOS - CALIVA GOBERNADORA", "FRENTE SALTA VA CON FELICIDAD": "FRENTE SALTA VA CON FELICIDAD", "ALIANZA GUSTAVO GOBERNADOR": "ALIANZA GUSTAVO GOBERNADOR", "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA MST - PARTIDO OBRERO": "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA MST - PARTIDO OBRERO", "JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO": "JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO", "INSTRUMENTO ELECTORAL POR LA UNIDAD POPULAR": "INSTRUMENTO ELECTORAL POR LA UNIDAD POPULAR", "VOTOS EN BLANCO": "VOTOS EN BLANCO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3271, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 3271, "cast_gt_registered": 3271, "registered_not_positive": 3271}, "n_stations_flagged": 3271, "created_at": "2026-07-01T21:05:59.325140", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3271}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "09767af6a723485aaa2bcd3f3d66155f", "name": "Argentina 2023 local (overnight argentina_tucuman_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"mesa": "mesa", "total_votes": "total_votes", "FRENTE_DE_TODOS_POR_TUCUMAN": "FRENTE_DE_TODOS_POR_TUCUMAN", "FRENTE_JUNTOS_POR_EL_CAMBIO": "FRENTE_JUNTOS_POR_EL_CAMBIO", "FUERZA_REPUBLICANA": "FUERZA_REPUBLICANA", "FRENTE_DE_IZQUIERDA_FIT_U": "FRENTE_DE_IZQUIERDA_FIT_U", "MOVIMIENTO_LIBRES_DEL_SUR": "MOVIMIENTO_LIBRES_DEL_SUR", "NOS_UNE_EL_CAMBIO": "NOS_UNE_EL_CAMBIO", "CAMINO_A_LA_LEALTAD": "CAMINO_A_LA_LEALTAD", "POLITICA_OBRERA": "POLITICA_OBRERA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4017, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 3906, "cast_valid_mismatch": 350, "registered_not_positive": 4017, "votes_gt_valid": 4017}, "n_stations_flagged": 4017, "created_at": "2026-07-01T21:05:48.025045", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4017}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a8206f8da9144e7a80e955362a60a5b8", "name": "Mexico 2021 local (overnight mexico_guerrero_2021_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.iepcgro.mx/computos2021/procode/datos/csv/20210718_2057_PROCODE.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PAN": "PAN", "PRI": "PRI", "PRD": "PRD", "PT": "PT", "PVEM": "PVEM", "MC": "MC", "MORENA": "MORENA", "PES": "PES", "RSP": "RSP", "FXM": "FXM", "PRI_PRD": "PRI_PRD", "PT_PVEM": "PT_PVEM", "NOREG": "NOREG", "NULO": "NULO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5008, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 4867, "cast_gt_registered": 64, "registered_not_positive": 57}, "n_stations_flagged": 4869, "created_at": "2026-07-01T21:05:34.341825", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.624, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.534, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 5008}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d2ca593979da497c9b7add837213cf37", "name": "Mexico 2022 local (overnight mexico_durango_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.prepdurango2022.mx/storage/publicacion/20220606_2000_PREP_DGO.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Esteban_Villegas_PAN_PRI_PRD": "Esteban_Villegas_PAN_PRI_PRD", "Alma_Marina_Vitela_PVEM_PT_MORENA_RSP": "Alma_Marina_Vitela_PVEM_PT_MORENA_RSP", "Patricia_Flores_MC": "Patricia_Flores_MC", "contabilizada": "contabilizada"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2546, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 1954, "invalid_gt_cast": 184, "cast_gt_registered": 14, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1891, "registered_not_positive": 12}, "n_stations_flagged": 2295, "created_at": "2026-07-01T21:05:26.053500", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.584, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.33, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.223, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.584, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.33, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.666, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.498, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.498, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.546, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.546, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.701, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2546}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0dbdb16579ce4278bb9a37cc64a87c6a", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_sergipe_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2022_SE.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"fabio_mitidieri_psd": "fabio_mitidieri_psd", "rogerio_carvalho_pt": "rogerio_carvalho_pt"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 75, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 75, "registered_not_positive": 75}, "n_stations_flagged": 75, "created_at": "2026-07-01T21:05:24.531110", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 75}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "73219d9e9fb4464f82d3ac0221dc4959", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_amapa_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2022_AP.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Cl\u00e9cio Lu\u00eds Vilhena Vieira": "Cl\u00e9cio Lu\u00eds Vilhena Vieira", "Gesiel De Souza Oliveira": "Gesiel De Souza Oliveira", "Gianfranco Gusm\u00e3o De Azevedo": "Gianfranco Gusm\u00e3o De Azevedo", "Gilvam Pinheiro Borges": "Gilvam Pinheiro Borges", "Jaime Domingues Nunes": "Jaime Domingues Nunes", "Jairo Palheta Da Silva Marques": "Jairo Palheta Da Silva Marques"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1740, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1740, "cast_gt_registered": 1740}, "n_stations_flagged": 1740, "created_at": "2026-07-01T21:05:19.146063", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1740}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "72e7683616f6479490319ea5d4d6af62", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_acre_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2022_AC.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CYLMARA FERNANDES DA ROCHA GRIPP": "CYLMARA FERNANDES DA ROCHA GRIPP", "DAVID SOARES HALL": "DAVID SOARES HALL", "GLADSON DE LIMA CAMELI": "GLADSON DE LIMA CAMELI", "JORGE NEY VIANA MACEDO NEVES": "JORGE NEY VIANA MACEDO NEVES", "MARCIO MIGUEL BITTAR": "MARCIO MIGUEL BITTAR", "NILSON EUCLIDES DA SILVA": "NILSON EUCLIDES DA SILVA", "SERGIO DE OLIVEIRA CUNHA": "SERGIO DE OLIVEIRA CUNHA", "VOTO_BRANCO": "VOTO_BRANCO", "VOTO_NULO": "VOTO_NULO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2124, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 2124, "cast_gt_registered": 2124, "registered_not_positive": 2124}, "n_stations_flagged": 2124, "created_at": "2026-07-01T21:05:12.533341", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2124}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d90d48993b244fe594f3af9647d1d398", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_rondonia_2022_governor_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2022_RO.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"marcos_rocha": "marcos_rocha", "marcos_rogerio": "marcos_rogerio"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4198, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 4198, "cast_gt_registered": 4198}, "n_stations_flagged": 4198, "created_at": "2026-07-01T21:05:00.952857", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4198}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "815205dc5d4944ae98e0c227fafbeb4b", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_roraima_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2022_RR.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cand_ANTONIO_OLIVERIO_GARCIA_DE_ALMEIDA": "cand_ANTONIO_OLIVERIO_GARCIA_DE_ALMEIDA", "cand_ARTHUR_HENRIQUE_BRAND_O_MACHADO": "cand_ARTHUR_HENRIQUE_BRAND_O_MACHADO", "cand_FRANCISCO_DOS_SANTOS_SAMPAIO": "cand_FRANCISCO_DOS_SANTOS_SAMPAIO", "cand_F_BIO_GON_ALVES_DE_ALMEIDA": "cand_F_BIO_GON_ALVES_DE_ALMEIDA", "cand_JURACI_FRANCISCO_DOS_SANTOS": "cand_JURACI_FRANCISCO_DOS_SANTOS", "cand_MARIA_TERESA_SAENZ_SURITA_GUIMAR_ES": "cand_MARIA_TERESA_SAENZ_SURITA_GUIMAR_ES", "cand_NELITA_FRANK": "cand_NELITA_FRANK", "cand_RUDSON_LEITE_DA_SILVA": "cand_RUDSON_LEITE_DA_SILVA", "invalid_nulo": "invalid_nulo", "invalid_branco": "invalid_branco"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1574, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 1547, "cast_gt_registered": 1574, "registered_not_positive": 1574}, "n_stations_flagged": 1574, "created_at": "2026-07-01T21:04:55.600897", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1574}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9f9dde5dbd824262b9710c05d27d6bba", "name": "United States 2022 local (overnight us_oregon_2022_legislature.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openelections/openelections-data-or/master/2022/20221108__or__general__precinct.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"H_CON": "H_CON", "H_DEM": "H_DEM", "H_LBT": "H_LBT", "H_OTH": "H_OTH", "H_OVERVOTE": "H_OVERVOTE", "H_PRO": "H_PRO", "H_REP": "H_REP", "H_UNDERVOTE": "H_UNDERVOTE", "H_WRITEIN": "H_WRITEIN", "S_DEM": "S_DEM", "S_LBT": "S_LBT", "S_NAV": "S_NAV", "S_OVERVOTE": "S_OVERVOTE", "S_REP": "S_REP", "S_UNDERVOTE": "S_UNDERVOTE", "S_WRITEIN": "S_WRITEIN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 465, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 324, "registered_not_positive": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 329, "created_at": "2026-06-27T18:28:52.363231", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 465}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1a8437b65f6a4c75a8e751553880e3cf", "name": "South Africa 2024 local (overnight south_africa_2024_gauteng_provincial_per_vd.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.elections.org.za/home/NPEPublicReports/1335/Downloadable%20Results/Provincial.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"#HOPE4SA": "#HOPE4SA", "ACTION ALLIANCE DEVELOPMENT PARTY": "ACTION ALLIANCE DEVELOPMENT PARTY", "ACTIONSA": "ACTIONSA", "AFRICA AFRICANS RECLAIM": "AFRICA AFRICANS RECLAIM", "AFRICA RESTORATION ALLIANCE": "AFRICA RESTORATION ALLIANCE", "AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY": "AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY", "AFRICAN CONGRESS FOR TRANSFORMATION": "AFRICAN CONGRESS FOR TRANSFORMATION", "AFRICAN HEART CONGRESS": "AFRICAN HEART CONGRESS", "AFRICAN INDEPENDENT CONGRESS": "AFRICAN INDEPENDENT CONGRESS", "AFRICAN INDEPENDENT PEOPLE'S ORGANISATION": "AFRICAN INDEPENDENT PEOPLE'S ORGANISATION", "AFRICAN MOVEMENT CONGRESS": "AFRICAN MOVEMENT CONGRESS", "AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS": "AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS", "AFRICAN PEOPLE FIRST": "AFRICAN PEOPLE FIRST", "AFRICAN PEOPLE'S CONVENTION": "AFRICAN PEOPLE'S CONVENTION", "AFRICAN TRANSFORMATION MOVEMENT": "AFRICAN TRANSFORMATION MOVEMENT", "AL JAMA-AH": "AL JAMA-AH", "ALLIANCE OF CITIZENS FOR CHANGE": "ALLIANCE OF CITIZENS FOR CHANGE", "ALLIED MOVEMENT FOR CHANGE": "ALLIED MOVEMENT FOR CHANGE", "ARISE SOUTH AFRICA": "ARISE SOUTH AFRICA", "AZANIA PEACEFUL REVOLUTION": "AZANIA PEACEFUL REVOLUTION", "AZANIAN PEOPLE'S ORGANISATION": "AZANIAN PEOPLE'S ORGANISATION", "BASIC INCOME GRANT SA": "BASIC INCOME GRANT SA", "BOLSHEVIKS PARTY OF SOUTH AFRICA": "BOLSHEVIKS PARTY OF SOUTH AFRICA", "BUILD ONE SOUTH AFRICA WITH MMUSI MAIMANE": "BUILD ONE SOUTH AFRICA WITH MMUSI MAIMANE", "CONGRESS OF THE PEOPLE": "CONGRESS OF THE PEOPLE", "DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE": "DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE", "ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS": "ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS", "ECONOMIC LIBERATORS FORUM SOUTH AFRICA": "ECONOMIC LIBERATORS FORUM SOUTH AFRICA", "FORUM 4 SERVICE DELIVERY": "FORUM 4 SERVICE DELIVERY", "GOOD": "GOOD", "INDEPENDENT": "INDEPENDENT", "INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY": "INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY", "NATIONAL FREEDOM PARTY": "NATIONAL FREEDOM PARTY", "OPERATION DUDULA": "OPERATION DUDULA", "PAN AFRICANIST CONGRESS OF AZANIA": "PAN AFRICANIST CONGRESS OF AZANIA", "PATRIOTIC ALLIANCE": "PATRIOTIC ALLIANCE", "RISE MZANSI": "RISE MZANSI", "SIZWE UMMAH NATION": "SIZWE UMMAH NATION", "SOUTH AFRICAN RAINBOW ALLIANCE": "SOUTH AFRICAN RAINBOW ALLIANCE", "UMKHONTO WESIZWE": "UMKHONTO WESIZWE", "UNITED AFRICANS TRANSFORMATION": "UNITED AFRICANS TRANSFORMATION", "UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT": "UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT", "VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS": "VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS", "XILUVA": "XILUVA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2797, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 13}, "n_stations_flagged": 13, "created_at": "2026-06-27T18:28:43.113976", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.695, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.351, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.734, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.648, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.695, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.351, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.046, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.391, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.648, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.517, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2797}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7aa6bd101b45491b81fbc8869b29d518", "name": "Indonesia 2024 local (overnight indonesia_jakarta_2024_governor_kecamatan.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Indonesia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"tps_total": "tps_total", "tps_counted": "tps_counted", "tps_persen": "tps_persen", "ridwan_kamil_suswono": "ridwan_kamil_suswono", "dharma_pongrekun_kun_wardana": "dharma_pongrekun_kun_wardana", "pramono_anung_rano_karno": "pramono_anung_rano_karno"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 44, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 44, "registered_not_positive": 44, "cast_gt_registered": 44}, "n_stations_flagged": 44, "created_at": "2026-06-27T18:28:41.578797", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.768, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.522, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.332, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.117, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.301, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.067, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.332, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.332, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.3, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.3, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.7, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.741, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 44}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "eefd8a64b7d4454ebb90f311ab2217cf", "name": "Argentina 2023 local (overnight argentina_entre_rios_2023_gobernador.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"recurridos": "recurridos", "mesas_escrutadas": "mesas_escrutadas", "mesas_total": "mesas_total", "Frigerio_Juntos_por_Entre_Rios": "Frigerio_Juntos_por_Entre_Rios", "Bahl_Mas_para_Entre_Rios": "Bahl_Mas_para_Entre_Rios", "Etchevehere_La_Libertad_Avanza": "Etchevehere_La_Libertad_Avanza"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 314, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 314, "registered_not_positive": 314, "votes_gt_valid": 314}, "n_stations_flagged": 314, "created_at": "2026-06-27T18:28:40.021201", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 314}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fe6810c30dd6437f8d960eed66afac53", "name": "Mexico 2024 local (overnight mexico_tabasco_2024_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://sicee.ine.mx/ACTASSICEEN2024/download/LOCALES/2024/TAB_PEL_2024.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PAN": "PAN", "PRI": "PRI", "PRD": "PRD", "PVEM": "PVEM", "PT": "PT", "MC": "MC", "MORENA": "MORENA", "PVEM_PT_MORENA": "PVEM_PT_MORENA", "PVEM_PT": "PVEM_PT", "PVEM_MORENA": "PVEM_MORENA", "PT_MORENA": "PT_MORENA", "PAN_PRI": "PAN_PRI", "CAND_NO_REG": "CAND_NO_REG"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3117, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 300, "cast_gt_registered": 45, "cast_valid_mismatch": 300, "registered_not_positive": 40}, "n_stations_flagged": 343, "created_at": "2026-06-27T18:28:30.801327", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "20e5284cf0684356834a4217753764ac", "name": "Mexico 2024 local (overnight mexico_yucatan_2024_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.iepac.mx/public/micrositios/resultados-electorales/procesos-electorales/2024/RESULTADOS-GUBERNATURA.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PAN": "PAN", "PRI": "PRI", "PRD": "PRD", "PVEM": "PVEM", "PT": "PT", "MC": "MC", "MORENA": "MORENA", "NAY": "NAY", "PAN_PRI_NAY": "PAN_PRI_NAY", "PAN_PRI": "PAN_PRI", "PAN_NAY": "PAN_NAY", "PRI_NAY": "PRI_NAY", "PVEM_PT_MORENA": "PVEM_PT_MORENA", "PVEM_PT": "PVEM_PT", "PVEM_MORENA": "PVEM_MORENA", "PT_MORENA": "PT_MORENA", "CAN_NREG": "CAN_NREG"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2967, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 230, "cast_gt_registered": 24, "cast_valid_mismatch": 230, "registered_not_positive": 16}, "n_stations_flagged": 251, "created_at": "2026-06-27T18:28:21.726221", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2967}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c0f4b69b3d1d467dae2b5e948861ad44", "name": "Mexico 2024 local (overnight mexico_morelos_2024_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://computos.impepac.mx/2024/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"margarita_gonzalez_saravia_morena_coal": "margarita_gonzalez_saravia_morena_coal", "lucia_meza_guzman_pan_pri_prd_rsp": "lucia_meza_guzman_pan_pri_prd_rsp", "jessica_ortega_mc_progresa": "jessica_ortega_mc_progresa"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2583, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 37, "registered_not_positive": 36}, "n_stations_flagged": 38, "created_at": "2026-06-27T18:28:10.389891", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2583}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bb920d9f8ce1445aa40e05e427a7d2d5", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_alagoas_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2022_AL.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"paulo_dantas_mdb": "paulo_dantas_mdb", "rodrigo_cunha_uniao": "rodrigo_cunha_uniao", "collor_pl": "collor_pl", "rui_palmeira_pp": "rui_palmeira_pp", "cicero_albuquerque": "cicero_albuquerque", "luciano_fontes": "luciano_fontes", "luciano_almeida": "luciano_almeida"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 102, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 102, "cast_gt_registered": 102}, "n_stations_flagged": 102, "created_at": "2026-06-27T18:28:09.031049", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 102}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cbce1eeebc0749e4a17c179c9db6ecb2", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_rio_grande_norte_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2022_RN.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ANTONIO BENTO DA SILVA": "ANTONIO BENTO DA SILVA", "CLORISA LINHARES DE VASCONCELOS VALE": "CLORISA LINHARES DE VASCONCELOS VALE", "DANNIEL ALEXANDRE FERREIRA DE MORAIS": "DANNIEL ALEXANDRE FERREIRA DE MORAIS", "EANN STYVENSON VALENTIM MENDES": "EANN STYVENSON VALENTIM MENDES", "FABIO BERCKMANS VERAS DANTAS": "FABIO BERCKMANS VERAS DANTAS", "JOSE NAZARENO EDSON DA SILVA": "JOSE NAZARENO EDSON DA SILVA", "KARLO RODRIGO LUCIO VIEIRA": "KARLO RODRIGO LUCIO VIEIRA", "MARIA DE FATIMA BEZERRA": "MARIA DE FATIMA BEZERRA", "ROSALIA MARIA FERNANDES": "ROSALIA MARIA FERNANDES"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7674, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 7674, "registered_not_positive": 7674}, "n_stations_flagged": 7674, "created_at": "2026-06-27T18:27:46.223653", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7674}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ed1fd81047cd4ae7a99f2cd4fabcb06c", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_piaui_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2022_PI.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Diego_Gomes_Melo": "Diego_Gomes_Melo", "Geraldo_Do_Nascimento_Carvalho": "Geraldo_Do_Nascimento_Carvalho", "Gessy_Karla_Lima_Borges_Fonseca": "Gessy_Karla_Lima_Borges_Fonseca", "Gustavo_Henrique_Leite_Feij": "Gustavo_Henrique_Leite_Feij", "Maria_De_Lourdes_Soares_Melo": "Maria_De_Lourdes_Soares_Melo", "Maria_Madalena_Nunes": "Maria_Madalena_Nunes", "Rafael_Tajra_Fonteles": "Rafael_Tajra_Fonteles", "Ravenna_De_Castro_Lima_Azevedo": "Ravenna_De_Castro_Lima_Azevedo", "Silvio_Mendes_De_Oliveira_Filho": "Silvio_Mendes_De_Oliveira_Filho"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 224, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 224, "cast_gt_registered": 224}, "n_stations_flagged": 224, "created_at": "2026-06-27T18:27:43.948394", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 224}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c0c57dd8dd8341f2926fb729c814e2bf", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_paraiba_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2022_PB.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ADJANY SIMPLICIO DE CASTRO": "ADJANY SIMPLICIO DE CASTRO", "ADRIANO TRAJANO DA CONCEI\u00c7\u00c3O": "ADRIANO TRAJANO DA CONCEI\u00c7\u00c3O", "ANT\u00d4NIO DO NASCIMENTO ALVES": "ANT\u00d4NIO DO NASCIMENTO ALVES", "F\u00c1BIO RODRIGUES DE OLIVEIRA": "F\u00c1BIO RODRIGUES DE OLIVEIRA", "JO\u00c3O AZEVEDO LINS FILHO": "JO\u00c3O AZEVEDO LINS FILHO", "NILVAN FERREIRA DO NASCIMENTO": "NILVAN FERREIRA DO NASCIMENTO", "PEDRO OLIVEIRA CUNHA LIMA": "PEDRO OLIVEIRA CUNHA LIMA", "VENEZIANO VITAL DO REGO SEGUNDO NETO": "VENEZIANO VITAL DO REGO SEGUNDO NETO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 223, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 223, "cast_gt_registered": 223}, "n_stations_flagged": 223, "created_at": "2026-06-27T18:27:42.530712", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 223}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "991a4a292e314478b583bc9c65d514a1", "name": "United States 2022 local (overnight us-pennsylvania-2022.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.pa.gov/content/dam/copapwp-pagov/en/dos/resources/voting-and-elections/bulk-data/ElectionReturns_2022_General_PrecinctReturns.txt", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"HOU-001-HARKINS PATRICK (DEM)": "HOU-001-HARKINS PATRICK (DEM)", "HOU-001-THOMAS MICHAEL (LIB)": "HOU-001-THOMAS MICHAEL (LIB)", "HOU-002-MERSKI ROBERT (DEM)": "HOU-002-MERSKI ROBERT (DEM)", "HOU-002-PACE MICHAEL (REP)": "HOU-002-PACE MICHAEL (REP)", "HOU-003-BIZZARRO RYAN (DEM)": "HOU-003-BIZZARRO RYAN (DEM)", "HOU-003-KUJAWA JOSEPH (REP)": "HOU-003-KUJAWA JOSEPH (REP)", "HOU-004-BANTA JACOB (REP)": "HOU-004-BANTA JACOB (REP)", "HOU-004-OLIVER CHELSEA (DEM)": "HOU-004-OLIVER CHELSEA (DEM)", "HOU-005-JOZWIAK BARRY (REP)": "HOU-005-JOZWIAK BARRY (REP)", "HOU-006-GALT NERISSA (DEM)": "HOU-006-GALT NERISSA (DEM)", "HOU-006-ROAE BRADLEY (REP)": "HOU-006-ROAE BRADLEY (REP)", "HOU-007-MCGONIGLE TIMOTHY (DEM)": "HOU-007-MCGONIGLE TIMOTHY (DEM)", "HOU-007-WENTLING PARKE (REP)": "HOU-007-WENTLING PARKE (REP)", "HOU-008-BERNSTINE AARON (REP)": "HOU-008-BERNSTINE AARON (REP)", "HOU-009-BROWN MARLA (REP)": "HOU-009-BROWN MARLA (REP)", "HOU-009-SAINATO CHRISTOPHER (DEM)": "HOU-009-SAINATO CHRISTOPHER (DEM)", "HOU-010-BROWN AMEN (DEM)": "HOU-010-BROWN AMEN (DEM)", "HOU-011-MUSTELLO MARCI (REP)": "HOU-011-MUSTELLO MARCI (REP)", "HOU-012-SCIALABBA STEPHENIE (REP)": "HOU-012-SCIALABBA STEPHENIE (REP)", "HOU-012-VIGUE ROBERT (DEM)": "HOU-012-VIGUE ROBERT (DEM)", "HOU-013-CUNNINGHAM DAVID (DEM)": "HOU-013-CUNNINGHAM DAVID (DEM)", "HOU-013-LAWRENCE JOHN (REP)": "HOU-013-LAWRENCE JOHN (REP)", "HOU-014-CARPER BRUCE (DEM)": "HOU-014-CARPER BRUCE (DEM)", "HOU-014-MARSHALL JAMES (REP)": "HOU-014-MARSHALL JAMES (REP)", "HOU-015-KAIL JOSHUA (REP)": "HOU-015-KAIL JOSHUA (REP)", "HOU-016-ELMORE RICO (REP)": "HOU-016-ELMORE RICO (REP)", "HOU-016-MATZIE ROBERT (DEM)": "HOU-016-MATZIE ROBERT (DEM)", "HOU-017-BONNER TIMOTHY (REP)": "HOU-017-BONNER TIMOTHY (REP)", "HOU-018-SMITH LAURIE (DEM)": "HOU-018-SMITH LAURIE (DEM)", "HOU-018-TOMLINSON KATHLEEN (REP)": "HOU-018-TOMLINSON KATHLEEN (REP)", "HOU-019-ABNEY AERION (DEM)": "HOU-019-ABNEY AERION (DEM)", "HOU-020-KINKEAD EMILY (DEM)": "HOU-020-KINKEAD EMILY (DEM)", "HOU-020-KRUTH MATTHEW (REP)": "HOU-020-KRUTH MATTHEW (REP)", "HOU-021-INNAMORATO SARA (DEM)": "HOU-021-INNAMORATO SARA (DEM)", "HOU-021-PERMAN FRANK (REP)": "HOU-021-PERMAN FRANK (REP)", "HOU-022-SIEGEL JOSHUA (DEM)": "HOU-022-SIEGEL JOSHUA (DEM)", "HOU-022-SMITH ROBERT (REP)": "HOU-022-SMITH ROBERT (REP)", "HOU-023-FRANKEL DAN (DEM)": "HOU-023-FRANKEL DAN (DEM)", "HOU-023-WALKER JAY (GRN)": "HOU-023-WALKER JAY (GRN)", "HOU-024-MAYES LATASHA (DEM)": "HOU-024-MAYES LATASHA (DEM)", "HOU-025-MARKOSEK BRANDON (DEM)": "HOU-025-MARKOSEK BRANDON (DEM)", "HOU-025-SCHLAUCH STEPHEN (REP)": "HOU-025-SCHLAUCH STEPHEN (REP)", "HOU-026-FRIEL PAUL (DEM)": "HOU-026-FRIEL PAUL (DEM)", "HOU-026-HENNESSEY TIMOTHY (REP)": "HOU-026-HENNESSEY TIMOTHY (REP)", "HOU-027-BROSKY EDWARD (REP)": "HOU-027-BROSKY EDWARD (REP)", "HOU-027-DEASY DANIEL (DEM)": "HOU-027-DEASY DANIEL (DEM)", "HOU-028-DUNCAN ALISON (DEM)": "HOU-028-DUNCAN ALISON (DEM)", "HOU-028-MERCURI ROBERT (REP)": "HOU-028-MERCURI ROBERT (REP)", "HOU-029-BRENNAN TIMOTHY (DEM)": "HOU-029-BRENNAN TIMOTHY (DEM)", "HOU-029-RONKY ROB (IND)": "HOU-029-RONKY ROB (IND)", "HOU-029-SMITH DIANE (REP)": "HOU-029-SMITH DIANE (REP)", "HOU-030-KIRK CYNTHIA (REP)": "HOU-030-KIRK CYNTHIA (REP)", "HOU-030-VENKAT ARVIND (DEM)": "HOU-030-VENKAT ARVIND (DEM)", "HOU-031-SAUER BERNARD (REP)": "HOU-031-SAUER BERNARD (REP)", "HOU-031-WARREN PERRY (DEM)": "HOU-031-WARREN PERRY (DEM)", "HOU-032-DELUCA ANTHONY (DEM)": "HOU-032-DELUCA ANTHONY (DEM)", "HOU-032-LIVINGSTON QUEONIA (GRN)": "HOU-032-LIVINGSTON QUEONIA (GRN)", "HOU-033-STEELE MANDY (DEM)": "HOU-033-STEELE MANDY (DEM)", "HOU-033-TOMSON THEODORE (REP)": "HOU-033-TOMSON THEODORE (REP)", "HOU-034-LEE SUMMER (DEM)": "HOU-034-LEE SUMMER (DEM)", "HOU-035-DAVIS AUSTIN (DEM)": "HOU-035-DAVIS AUSTIN (DEM)", "HOU-035-NEVILLS DONALD (REP)": "HOU-035-NEVILLS DONALD (REP)", "HOU-036-BENHAM JESSICA (DEM)": "HOU-036-BENHAM JESSICA (DEM)", "HOU-036-SYLVESTER ROSS (LIB)": "HOU-036-SYLVESTER ROSS (LIB)", "HOU-037-FEE MELINDA (REP)": "HOU-037-FEE MELINDA (REP)", "HOU-038-PISCIOTTANO NICKOLAS (DEM)": "HOU-038-PISCIOTTANO NICKOLAS (DEM)", "HOU-039-KUZMA ANDREW (REP)": "HOU-039-KUZMA ANDREW (REP)", "HOU-039-SELF RICHARD (DEM)": "HOU-039-SELF RICHARD (DEM)", "HOU-040-STUCK NATALIE (REP)": "HOU-040-STUCK NATALIE (REP)", "HOU-040-TODD CHRISTOPHER (DEM)": "HOU-040-TODD CHRISTOPHER (DEM)", "HOU-041-ASIA FAVYAN (LIB)": "HOU-041-ASIA FAVYAN (LIB)", "HOU-041-MILLER BRETT (REP)": "HOU-041-MILLER BRETT (REP)", "HOU-042-MILLER DANIEL (DEM)": "HOU-042-MILLER DANIEL (DEM)", "HOU-042-TYLKA PATRICIA (REP)": "HOU-042-TYLKA PATRICIA (REP)", "HOU-043-GREINER KEITH (REP)": "HOU-043-GREINER KEITH (REP)", "HOU-044-GAYDOS VALERIE (REP)": "HOU-044-GAYDOS VALERIE (REP)", "HOU-044-TURICI DEBBIE (DEM)": "HOU-044-TURICI DEBBIE (DEM)", "HOU-045-KULIK ANITA (DEM)": "HOU-045-KULIK ANITA (DEM)", "HOU-045-PENDEL MICHAEL (REP)": "HOU-045-PENDEL MICHAEL (REP)", "HOU-046-ORTITAY JASON (REP)": "HOU-046-ORTITAY JASON (REP)", "HOU-047-D'ORSIE JOSEPH (REP)": "HOU-047-D'ORSIE JOSEPH (REP)", "HOU-048-O'NEAL TIMOTHY (REP)": "HOU-048-O'NEAL TIMOTHY (REP)", "HOU-049-RIVERS ANNE (REP)": "HOU-049-RIVERS ANNE (REP)", "HOU-049-SMITH-WADE-EL ISMAIL (DEM)": "HOU-049-SMITH-WADE-EL ISMAIL (DEM)", "HOU-050-COOK DONALD (REP)": "HOU-050-COOK DONALD (REP)", "HOU-050-MASON DOUGLAS (DEM)": "HOU-050-MASON DOUGLAS (DEM)", "HOU-051-KRUPA CHARITY (REP)": "HOU-051-KRUPA CHARITY (REP)", "HOU-051-RINGER RICHARD (DEM)": "HOU-051-RINGER RICHARD (DEM)", "HOU-052-WARNER RYAN (REP)": "HOU-052-WARNER RYAN (REP)", "HOU-053-MALAGARI STEVEN (DEM)": "HOU-053-MALAGARI STEVEN (DEM)", "HOU-053-SODHA JENNIFER (REP)": "HOU-053-SODHA JENNIFER (REP)", "HOU-054-ANDERSON ALLEN (REP)": "HOU-054-ANDERSON ALLEN (REP)", "HOU-054-SCOTT GREGORY (DEM)": "HOU-054-SCOTT GREGORY (DEM)", "HOU-055-COOPER JILL (REP)": "HOU-055-COOPER JILL (REP)", "HOU-055-GAUSS SCOTT (DEM)": "HOU-055-GAUSS SCOTT (DEM)", "HOU-056-DUNBAR GEORGE (REP)": "HOU-056-DUNBAR GEORGE (REP)", "HOU-057-NELSON ERIC (REP)": "HOU-057-NELSON ERIC (REP)", "HOU-058-BACH KENNETH (DEM)": "HOU-058-BACH KENNETH (DEM)", "HOU-058-DAVANZO ERIC (REP)": "HOU-058-DAVANZO ERIC (REP)", "HOU-059-ROSSI LESLIE (REP)": "HOU-059-ROSSI LESLIE (REP)", "HOU-060-GEORGE ROBERT (DEM)": "HOU-060-GEORGE ROBERT (DEM)", "HOU-060-MAJOR ABIGAIL (REP)": "HOU-060-MAJOR ABIGAIL (REP)", "HOU-061-BRADICA JESSIE (REP)": "HOU-061-BRADICA JESSIE (REP)", "HOU-061-HANBIDGE LAURA ELIZABETH (DEM)": "HOU-061-HANBIDGE LAURA ELIZABETH (DEM)", "HOU-062-DOYLE BRIAN (DEM)": "HOU-062-DOYLE BRIAN (DEM)", "HOU-062-STRUZZI JAMES (REP)": "HOU-062-STRUZZI JAMES (REP)", "HOU-063-OBERLANDER DONNA (REP)": "HOU-063-OBERLANDER DONNA (REP)", "HOU-064-JAMES ROBERT (REP)": "HOU-064-JAMES ROBERT (REP)", "HOU-065-RAPP KATHY (REP)": "HOU-065-RAPP KATHY (REP)", "HOU-066-SMITH BRIAN (REP)": "HOU-066-SMITH BRIAN (REP)", "HOU-067-CAUSER MARTIN (REP)": "HOU-067-CAUSER MARTIN (REP)", "HOU-068-OWLETT CLINTON (REP)": "HOU-068-OWLETT CLINTON (REP)", "HOU-069-METZGAR CARL (REP)": "HOU-069-METZGAR CARL (REP)", "HOU-070-BRADFORD MATTHEW (DEM)": "HOU-070-BRADFORD MATTHEW (DEM)", "HOU-070-BUSTARD ARTHUR (REP)": "HOU-070-BUSTARD ARTHUR (REP)", "HOU-071-RIGBY JAMES (REP)": "HOU-071-RIGBY JAMES (REP)", "HOU-072-BILLOW H (REP)": "HOU-072-BILLOW H (REP)", "HOU-072-BURNS FRANK (DEM)": "HOU-072-BURNS FRANK (DEM)", "HOU-073-KEPHART DALLAS (REP)": "HOU-073-KEPHART DALLAS (REP)", "HOU-074-HENSEL DALE (REP)": "HOU-074-HENSEL DALE (REP)", "HOU-074-WILLIAMS DAN (DEM)": "HOU-074-WILLIAMS DAN (DEM)", "HOU-075-ARMANINI MICHAEL (REP)": "HOU-075-ARMANINI MICHAEL (REP)", "HOU-075-VOGT ERICA (DEM)": "HOU-075-VOGT ERICA (DEM)", "HOU-076-BOROWICZ STEPHANIE (REP)": "HOU-076-BOROWICZ STEPHANIE (REP)", "HOU-076-MARIS DENISE (DEM)": "HOU-076-MARIS DENISE (DEM)", "HOU-077-CONKLIN HARRY (DEM)": "HOU-077-CONKLIN HARRY (DEM)", "HOU-077-YETSKO STEPHEN (REP)": "HOU-077-YETSKO STEPHEN (REP)", "HOU-078-TOPPER JESSE (REP)": "HOU-078-TOPPER JESSE (REP)", "HOU-079-SCHMITT LOUIS (REP)": "HOU-079-SCHMITT LOUIS (REP)", "HOU-080-CAPENOS KIMBERLY (DEM)": "HOU-080-CAPENOS KIMBERLY (DEM)", "HOU-080-GREGORY JAMES (REP)": "HOU-080-GREGORY JAMES (REP)", "HOU-081-IRVIN RICHARD (REP)": "HOU-081-IRVIN RICHARD (REP)", "HOU-081-KIDD IAN (DEM)": "HOU-081-KIDD IAN (DEM)", "HOU-082-BEHRENS JUSTIN (REP)": "HOU-082-BEHRENS JUSTIN (REP)", "HOU-082-TAKAC PAUL (DEM)": "HOU-082-TAKAC PAUL (DEM)", "HOU-083-FLICK JAMIE (REP)": "HOU-083-FLICK JAMIE (REP)", "HOU-084-HAMM JOSEPH (REP)": "HOU-084-HAMM JOSEPH (REP)", "HOU-085-ROWE DAVID (REP)": "HOU-085-ROWE DAVID (REP)", "HOU-086-STAMBAUGH PERRY (REP)": "HOU-086-STAMBAUGH PERRY (REP)", "HOU-087-KUTZ THOMAS (REP)": "HOU-087-KUTZ THOMAS (REP)", "HOU-087-MARKLE KRISTAL (DEM)": "HOU-087-MARKLE KRISTAL (DEM)", "HOU-088-AGERTON SARA (DEM)": "HOU-088-AGERTON SARA (DEM)", "HOU-088-DELOZIER SHERYL (REP)": "HOU-088-DELOZIER SHERYL (REP)", "HOU-089-KAUFFMAN ROBERT (REP)": "HOU-089-KAUFFMAN ROBERT (REP)", "HOU-090-SCHEMEL PAUL (REP)": "HOU-090-SCHEMEL PAUL (REP)", "HOU-091-BELLIVEAU NEIL (LIB)": "HOU-091-BELLIVEAU NEIL (LIB)", "HOU-091-MOUL DANIEL (REP)": "HOU-091-MOUL DANIEL (REP)", "HOU-091-QUALLY MARTY (DEM)": "HOU-091-QUALLY MARTY (DEM)", "HOU-092-ALMONEY DANIEL (DEM)": "HOU-092-ALMONEY DANIEL (DEM)", "HOU-092-KEEFER DAWN (REP)": "HOU-092-KEEFER DAWN (REP)", "HOU-093-COUSLER-WOMACK KRISTINE (KEY)": "HOU-093-COUSLER-WOMACK KRISTINE (KEY)", "HOU-093-JONES PAUL (REP)": "HOU-093-JONES PAUL (REP)", "HOU-093-RODKEY CHRISTOPHER (DEM)": "HOU-093-RODKEY CHRISTOPHER (DEM)", "HOU-094-FINK WENDY (REP)": "HOU-094-FINK WENDY (REP)", "HOU-095-HILL-EVANS CAROL (DEM)": "HOU-095-HILL-EVANS CAROL (DEM)", "HOU-096-STURLA P (DEM)": "HOU-096-STURLA P (DEM)", "HOU-096-WEAVER APRIL (REP)": "HOU-096-WEAVER APRIL (REP)", "HOU-097-MENTZER STEVEN (REP)": "HOU-097-MENTZER STEVEN (REP)", "HOU-098-GERBER JOSHUA (LIB)": "HOU-098-GERBER JOSHUA (LIB)", "HOU-098-JONES THOMAS (REP)": "HOU-098-JONES THOMAS (REP)", "HOU-098-TEMONS MARK (DEM)": "HOU-098-TEMONS MARK (DEM)", "HOU-099-CALTAGIRONE JOSHUA (DEM)": "HOU-099-CALTAGIRONE JOSHUA (DEM)", "HOU-099-ZIMMERMAN DAVID (REP)": "HOU-099-ZIMMERMAN DAVID (REP)", "HOU-100-CUTLER BRYAN (REP)": "HOU-100-CUTLER BRYAN (REP)", "HOU-101-MILLER CATHERINE (DEM)": "HOU-101-MILLER CATHERINE (DEM)", "HOU-101-SCHLEGEL JOHN (REP)": "HOU-101-SCHLEGEL JOHN (REP)", "HOU-102-DIAMOND RUSSELL (REP)": "HOU-102-DIAMOND RUSSELL (REP)", "HOU-102-QUICK SUSAN (DEM)": "HOU-102-QUICK SUSAN (DEM)", "HOU-103-BUELL DAVID (REP)": "HOU-103-BUELL DAVID (REP)", "HOU-103-KIM PATTY (DEM)": "HOU-103-KIM PATTY (DEM)", "HOU-104-KOCUR DAVID (KEY)": "HOU-104-KOCUR DAVID (KEY)", "HOU-104-MADSEN DAVID (DEM)": "HOU-104-MADSEN DAVID (DEM)", "HOU-105-FLEMING JUSTIN (DEM)": "HOU-105-FLEMING JUSTIN (DEM)", "HOU-105-KENLEY THERESE (REP)": "HOU-105-KENLEY THERESE (REP)", "HOU-106-MEHAFFIE THOMAS (REP)": "HOU-106-MEHAFFIE THOMAS (REP)", "HOU-107-MOCK RYAN (DEM)": "HOU-107-MOCK RYAN (DEM)", "HOU-107-STEHR JOANNE (REP)": "HOU-107-STEHR JOANNE (REP)", "HOU-108-SCHLEGEL CULVER LYNDA (REP)": "HOU-108-SCHLEGEL CULVER LYNDA (REP)", "HOU-109-ANDERSON THOMAS (LIB)": "HOU-109-ANDERSON THOMAS (LIB)", "HOU-109-GIANNATTASIO EDWARD (DEM)": "HOU-109-GIANNATTASIO EDWARD (DEM)", "HOU-109-LEADBETER ROBERT (REP)": "HOU-109-LEADBETER ROBERT (REP)", "HOU-110-PICKETT TINA (REP)": "HOU-110-PICKETT TINA (REP)", "HOU-111-FRITZ JONATHAN (REP)": "HOU-111-FRITZ JONATHAN (REP)", "HOU-112-MULLINS KYLE (DEM)": "HOU-112-MULLINS KYLE (DEM)", "HOU-112-TORBECK WILLIAM (REP)": "HOU-112-TORBECK WILLIAM (REP)", "HOU-113-DONAHUE KYLE (DEM)": "HOU-113-DONAHUE KYLE (DEM)", "HOU-113-SEPKOWSKI AARON (REP)": "HOU-113-SEPKOWSKI AARON (REP)", "HOU-114-BURGERHOFF DAVID (REP)": "HOU-114-BURGERHOFF DAVID (REP)", "HOU-114-KOSIEROWSKI BRIDGET (DEM)": "HOU-114-KOSIEROWSKI BRIDGET (DEM)", "HOU-115-MADDEN MAUREEN (DEM)": "HOU-115-MADDEN MAUREEN (DEM)", "HOU-115-PAOLUCCI KRISTA (REP)": "HOU-115-PAOLUCCI KRISTA (REP)", "HOU-116-RODRIGUEZ YESENIA (DEM)": "HOU-116-RODRIGUEZ YESENIA (DEM)", "HOU-116-WATRO DANE (REP)": "HOU-116-WATRO DANE (REP)", "HOU-117-CABELL MICHAEL (REP)": "HOU-117-CABELL MICHAEL (REP)", "HOU-118-HADDOCK JAMES (DEM)": "HOU-118-HADDOCK JAMES (DEM)", "HOU-118-MAY JAMES (REP)": "HOU-118-MAY JAMES (REP)", "HOU-119-MALACARI VITO (DEM)": "HOU-119-MALACARI VITO (DEM)", "HOU-119-RYNCAVAGE ALEC (REP)": "HOU-119-RYNCAVAGE ALEC (REP)", "HOU-120-KAUFER AARON (REP)": "HOU-120-KAUFER AARON (REP)", "HOU-120-LEARD FERN (DEM)": "HOU-120-LEARD FERN (DEM)", "HOU-121-HARVEY ERYN (REP)": "HOU-121-HARVEY ERYN (REP)", "HOU-121-PASHINSKI EDWIN (DEM)": "HOU-121-PASHINSKI EDWIN (DEM)", "HOU-122-HEFFLEY DOYLE (REP)": "HOU-122-HEFFLEY DOYLE (REP)", "HOU-122-KOST RICHARD (DEM)": "HOU-122-KOST RICHARD (DEM)", "HOU-123-BENYAK KATHLEEN (DEM)": "HOU-123-BENYAK KATHLEEN (DEM)", "HOU-123-TWARDZIK TIMOTHY (REP)": "HOU-123-TWARDZIK TIMOTHY (REP)", "HOU-124-BARTON JAMES (REP)": "HOU-124-BARTON JAMES (REP)", "HOU-124-BURNS TINA (DEM)": "HOU-124-BURNS TINA (DEM)", "HOU-125-KERWIN JOSEPH (REP)": "HOU-125-KERWIN JOSEPH (REP)", "HOU-126-OSWALD JAMES (REP)": "HOU-126-OSWALD JAMES (REP)", "HOU-126-ROZZI MARK (DEM)": "HOU-126-ROZZI MARK (DEM)", "HOU-127-GAGLIARDO VINCENT (REP)": "HOU-127-GAGLIARDO VINCENT (REP)", "HOU-127-GUZMAN MANUEL (DEM)": "HOU-127-GUZMAN MANUEL (DEM)", "HOU-128-GILLEN MARK (REP)": "HOU-128-GILLEN MARK (REP)", "HOU-129-CEPEDA-FREYTIZ JOHANNY (DEM)": "HOU-129-CEPEDA-FREYTIZ JOHANNY (DEM)", "HOU-129-LLEWELLYN BARRY (REP)": "HOU-129-LLEWELLYN BARRY (REP)", "HOU-130-MALONEY DAVID (REP)": "HOU-130-MALONEY DAVID (REP)", "HOU-131-BRANCO KEVIN (DEM)": "HOU-131-BRANCO KEVIN (DEM)", "HOU-131-MACKENZIE V (REP)": "HOU-131-MACKENZIE V (REP)", "HOU-132-FINCH BETHNEY (REP)": "HOU-132-FINCH BETHNEY (REP)", "HOU-132-SCHLOSSBERG MICHAEL (DEM)": "HOU-132-SCHLOSSBERG MICHAEL (DEM)", "HOU-132-SCHUTTER MATTHEW (LIB)": "HOU-132-SCHUTTER MATTHEW (LIB)", "HOU-133-MCNEILL JEANNE (DEM)": "HOU-133-MCNEILL JEANNE (DEM)", "HOU-134-LABENBERG BRENT (REP)": "HOU-134-LABENBERG BRENT (REP)", "HOU-134-SCHWEYER PETER (DEM)": "HOU-134-SCHWEYER PETER (DEM)", "HOU-135-SAMUELSON STEPHEN (DEM)": "HOU-135-SAMUELSON STEPHEN (DEM)", "HOU-136-FREEMAN ROBERT (DEM)": "HOU-136-FREEMAN ROBERT (DEM)", "HOU-137-EMRICK JOSEPH (REP)": "HOU-137-EMRICK JOSEPH (REP)", "HOU-137-THOMAS ANNA (DEM)": "HOU-137-THOMAS ANNA (DEM)", "HOU-138-FLOOD ANN (REP)": "HOU-138-FLOOD ANN (REP)", "HOU-138-HUNTER EUGENE (DEM)": "HOU-138-HUNTER EUGENE (DEM)", "HOU-139-ADAMS JOSEPH (REP)": "HOU-139-ADAMS JOSEPH (REP)", "HOU-139-ROSENFELD MEGHAN (DEM)": "HOU-139-ROSENFELD MEGHAN (DEM)", "HOU-140-GALLOWAY JOHN (DEM)": "HOU-140-GALLOWAY JOHN (DEM)", "HOU-141-BELLERBY-ALLEN KELLY (REP)": "HOU-141-BELLERBY-ALLEN KELLY (REP)", "HOU-141-DAVIS TINA (DEM)": "HOU-141-DAVIS TINA (DEM)", "HOU-141-PORTILLO ANTHONY (LIB)": "HOU-141-PORTILLO ANTHONY (LIB)", "HOU-142-HOGAN JOSEPH (REP)": "HOU-142-HOGAN JOSEPH (REP)", "HOU-142-MOFFA MARK (DEM)": "HOU-142-MOFFA MARK (DEM)", "HOU-143-LABS SHELBY (REP)": "HOU-143-LABS SHELBY (REP)", "HOU-143-STOLTZ GWENDOLYN (DEM)": "HOU-143-STOLTZ GWENDOLYN (DEM)", "HOU-144-MUNROE BRIAN (DEM)": "HOU-144-MUNROE BRIAN (DEM)", "HOU-144-POLINCHOCK F (REP)": "HOU-144-POLINCHOCK F (REP)", "HOU-145-MILLER JAMES (DEM)": "HOU-145-MILLER JAMES (DEM)", "HOU-145-STAATS CRAIG (REP)": "HOU-145-STAATS CRAIG (REP)", "HOU-145-VANLIEW LULA (LIB)": "HOU-145-VANLIEW LULA (LIB)", "HOU-146-CIRESI JOSEPH (DEM)": "HOU-146-CIRESI JOSEPH (DEM)", "HOU-146-NEAFCY THOMAS (REP)": "HOU-146-NEAFCY THOMAS (REP)", "HOU-147-SCHEUREN DONNA (REP)": "HOU-147-SCHEUREN DONNA (REP)", "HOU-147-WISSER ALEXANDRA (DEM)": "HOU-147-WISSER ALEXANDRA (DEM)", "HOU-148-DALEY MARY (DEM)": "HOU-148-DALEY MARY (DEM)", "HOU-148-O'DONNELL FRANCIS (REP)": "HOU-148-O'DONNELL FRANCIS (REP)", "HOU-149-BRIGGS TIMOTHY (DEM)": "HOU-149-BRIGGS TIMOTHY (DEM)", "HOU-149-PRICE NANCY (REP)": "HOU-149-PRICE NANCY (REP)", "HOU-150-MAZZA BETH (REP)": "HOU-150-MAZZA BETH (REP)", "HOU-150-WEBSTER JOSEPH (DEM)": "HOU-150-WEBSTER JOSEPH (DEM)", "HOU-151-CERRATO MELISSA (DEM)": "HOU-151-CERRATO MELISSA (DEM)", "HOU-151-STEPHENS WILLIAM (REP)": "HOU-151-STEPHENS WILLIAM (REP)", "HOU-152-GUENST NANCY (DEM)": "HOU-152-GUENST NANCY (DEM)", "HOU-152-WEINRICH JOHN (REP)": "HOU-152-WEINRICH JOHN (REP)", "HOU-153-SANCHEZ BENJAMIN (DEM)": "HOU-153-SANCHEZ BENJAMIN (DEM)", "HOU-153-ULRICH LARRY (REP)": "HOU-153-ULRICH LARRY (REP)", "HOU-154-BANKS ANGELINA (REP)": "HOU-154-BANKS ANGELINA (REP)", "HOU-154-NELSON NAPOLEON (DEM)": "HOU-154-NELSON NAPOLEON (DEM)", "HOU-155-OTTEN DANIELLE (DEM)": "HOU-155-OTTEN DANIELLE (DEM)", "HOU-155-SCRIBNER KYLE (REP)": "HOU-155-SCRIBNER KYLE (REP)", "HOU-156-PIELLI CHRISTOPHER (DEM)": "HOU-156-PIELLI CHRISTOPHER (DEM)", "HOU-156-VANDERWAAL HEIDI (REP)": "HOU-156-VANDERWAAL HEIDI (REP)", "HOU-157-MARVIN SARAH (REP)": "HOU-157-MARVIN SARAH (REP)", "HOU-157-SHUSTERMAN MELISSA (DEM)": "HOU-157-SHUSTERMAN MELISSA (DEM)", "HOU-158-SAPPEY CHRISTINA (DEM)": "HOU-158-SAPPEY CHRISTINA (DEM)", "HOU-158-SPENCER LEON (REP)": "HOU-158-SPENCER LEON (REP)", "HOU-159-KAZEEM CAROL (DEM)": "HOU-159-KAZEEM CAROL (DEM)", "HOU-159-MOTON RUTH (REP)": "HOU-159-MOTON RUTH (REP)", "HOU-160-SPAHR CATHERINE (DEM)": "HOU-160-SPAHR CATHERINE (DEM)", "HOU-160-WILLIAMS WENDELL (REP)": "HOU-160-WILLIAMS WENDELL (REP)", "HOU-161-KRUEGER LEANNE (DEM)": "HOU-161-KRUEGER LEANNE (DEM)", "HOU-161-MONGELLUZZO EDWARD (REP)": "HOU-161-MONGELLUZZO EDWARD (REP)", "HOU-162-DELLOSO DAVID (DEM)": "HOU-162-DELLOSO DAVID (DEM)", "HOU-162-MATTUS MICHELLE (REP)": "HOU-162-MATTUS MICHELLE (REP)", "HOU-163-GOODWIN ALFEIA (LIB)": "HOU-163-GOODWIN ALFEIA (LIB)", "HOU-163-RUCCI KENNETH (REP)": "HOU-163-RUCCI KENNETH (REP)", "HOU-163-ZABEL MICHAEL (DEM)": "HOU-163-ZABEL MICHAEL (DEM)", "HOU-164-CURRY GINA (DEM)": "HOU-164-CURRY GINA (DEM)", "HOU-165-FOSTER WILLIAM (FOV)": "HOU-165-FOSTER WILLIAM (FOV)", "HOU-165-MISSINO NICHOLE (REP)": "HOU-165-MISSINO NICHOLE (REP)", "HOU-165-O'MARA JENNIFER (DEM)": "HOU-165-O'MARA JENNIFER (DEM)", "HOU-166-CLIFFORD EDWARD (LIB)": "HOU-166-CLIFFORD EDWARD (LIB)", "HOU-166-RAZZANO KIMBERLY (REP)": "HOU-166-RAZZANO KIMBERLY (REP)", "HOU-166-VITALI GREGORY (DEM)": "HOU-166-VITALI GREGORY (DEM)", "HOU-167-HOWARD KRISTINE (DEM)": "HOU-167-HOWARD KRISTINE (DEM)", "HOU-167-NEWMAN GAIL (REP)": "HOU-167-NEWMAN GAIL (REP)", "HOU-168-BOROWSKI LISA (DEM)": "HOU-168-BOROWSKI LISA (DEM)", "HOU-168-QUINN CHRISTOPHER (REP)": "HOU-168-QUINN CHRISTOPHER (REP)", "HOU-169-KLUNK KATE (REP)": "HOU-169-KLUNK KATE (REP)", "HOU-169-RISTON ISAAC (DEM)": "HOU-169-RISTON ISAAC (DEM)", "HOU-170-WHITE MARTINA (REP)": "HOU-170-WHITE MARTINA (REP)", "HOU-171-BENNINGHOFF KERRY (REP)": "HOU-171-BENNINGHOFF KERRY (REP)", "HOU-171-ZEIGLER ROBERT (DEM)": "HOU-171-ZEIGLER ROBERT (DEM)", "HOU-172-BOYLE KEVIN (DEM)": "HOU-172-BOYLE KEVIN (DEM)", "HOU-172-TAUBENBERGER AL (REP)": "HOU-172-TAUBENBERGER AL (REP)", "HOU-173-GALLAGHER PATRICK (DEM)": "HOU-173-GALLAGHER PATRICK (DEM)", "HOU-174-NEILSON EDWARD (DEM)": "HOU-174-NEILSON EDWARD (DEM)", "HOU-175-ISAACSON MARYLOUISE (DEM)": "HOU-175-ISAACSON MARYLOUISE (DEM)", "HOU-176-CHRISTMAN HOPE (DEM)": "HOU-176-CHRISTMAN HOPE (DEM)", "HOU-176-PANGIA AUTUMN (LIB)": "HOU-176-PANGIA AUTUMN (LIB)", "HOU-176-RADER JACK (REP)": "HOU-176-RADER JACK (REP)", "HOU-177-HOHENSTEIN JOSEPH (DEM)": "HOU-177-HOHENSTEIN JOSEPH (DEM)", "HOU-177-LAVELLE MARK (REP)": "HOU-177-LAVELLE MARK (REP)", "HOU-178-BREYMAN ILYA (DEM)": "HOU-178-BREYMAN ILYA (DEM)", "HOU-178-MARCELL KRISTIN (REP)": "HOU-178-MARCELL KRISTIN (REP)", "HOU-179-DAWKINS JASON (DEM)": "HOU-179-DAWKINS JASON (DEM)", "HOU-180-GIRAL JOSE (DEM)": "HOU-180-GIRAL JOSE (DEM)", "HOU-181-KENYATTA MALCOLM (DEM)": "HOU-181-KENYATTA MALCOLM (DEM)", "HOU-182-ROBLES MONTAS ALBERT (REP)": "HOU-182-ROBLES MONTAS ALBERT (REP)", "HOU-182-WAXMAN BENJAMIN (DEM)": "HOU-182-WAXMAN BENJAMIN (DEM)", "HOU-183-MAKO ZACHARY (REP)": "HOU-183-MAKO ZACHARY (REP)", "HOU-184-FIEDLER ELIZABETH (DEM)": "HOU-184-FIEDLER ELIZABETH (DEM)", "HOU-184-MURRAY MARJILYN (REP)": "HOU-184-MURRAY MARJILYN (REP)", "HOU-185-YOUNG REGINA (DEM)": "HOU-185-YOUNG REGINA (DEM)", "HOU-186-HARRIS JORDAN (DEM)": "HOU-186-HARRIS JORDAN (DEM)", "HOU-187-MACKENZIE RYAN (REP)": "HOU-187-MACKENZIE RYAN (REP)", "HOU-188-KRAJEWSKI RICK (DEM)": "HOU-188-KRAJEWSKI RICK (DEM)", "HOU-189-ERTLE STEPHEN (REP)": "HOU-189-ERTLE STEPHEN (REP)", "HOU-189-PROBST TARAH (DEM)": "HOU-189-PROBST TARAH (DEM)", "HOU-190-GREEN GWENDOLYN (DEM)": "HOU-190-GREEN GWENDOLYN (DEM)", "HOU-190-JACKSON JAMES (IND)": "HOU-190-JACKSON JAMES (IND)", "HOU-191-MCCLINTON JOANNA (DEM)": "HOU-191-MCCLINTON JOANNA (DEM)", "HOU-192-CEPHAS MORGAN (DEM)": "HOU-192-CEPHAS MORGAN (DEM)", "HOU-193-ECKER TORREN (REP)": "HOU-193-ECKER TORREN (REP)", "HOU-194-DANOWSKI TORREN (LIB)": "HOU-194-DANOWSKI TORREN (LIB)", "HOU-194-KHAN TARIK (DEM)": "HOU-194-KHAN TARIK (DEM)", "HOU-195-BULLOCK DONNA (DEM)": "HOU-195-BULLOCK DONNA (DEM)", "HOU-196-GROVE SETH (REP)": "HOU-196-GROVE SETH (REP)", "HOU-197-BURGOS DANILO (DEM)": "HOU-197-BURGOS DANILO (DEM)", "HOU-198-PARKER DARISHA (DEM)": "HOU-198-PARKER DARISHA (DEM)", "HOU-199-GLEIM BARBARA (REP)": "HOU-199-GLEIM BARBARA (REP)", "HOU-199-HOWE ROBERT (DEM)": "HOU-199-HOWE ROBERT (DEM)", "HOU-200-RABB CHRISTOPHER (DEM)": "HOU-200-RABB CHRISTOPHER (DEM)", "HOU-200-WEST KIONNA (REP)": "HOU-200-WEST KIONNA (REP)", "HOU-201-KINSEY STEPHEN (DEM)": "HOU-201-KINSEY STEPHEN (DEM)", "HOU-202-SOLOMON JARED (DEM)": "HOU-202-SOLOMON JARED (DEM)", "HOU-203-BELLMON ANTHONY (DEM)": "HOU-203-BELLMON ANTHONY (DEM)", "SEN-002-TARTAGLIONE CHRISTINE (DEM)": "SEN-002-TARTAGLIONE CHRISTINE (DEM)", "SEN-004-HAYWOOD ARTHUR (DEM)": "SEN-004-HAYWOOD ARTHUR (DEM)", "SEN-004-JOHNSON TODD (REP)": "SEN-004-JOHNSON TODD (REP)", "SEN-006-BENTRIM BRANDON (LIB)": "SEN-006-BENTRIM BRANDON (LIB)", "SEN-006-FARRY FRANK (REP)": "SEN-006-FARRY FRANK (REP)", "SEN-006-MITCHELL ANN MARIE (DEM)": "SEN-006-MITCHELL ANN MARIE (DEM)", "SEN-008-HAYES JOHN (REP)": "SEN-008-HAYES JOHN (REP)", "SEN-008-WILLIAMS ANTHONY (DEM)": "SEN-008-WILLIAMS ANTHONY (DEM)", "SEN-010-MCCULLOUGH MATTHEW (REP)": "SEN-010-MCCULLOUGH MATTHEW (REP)", "SEN-010-SANTARSIERO STEVEN (DEM)": "SEN-010-SANTARSIERO STEVEN (DEM)", "SEN-012-COLLETT MARIA (DEM)": "SEN-012-COLLETT MARIA (DEM)", "SEN-012-DAVIES ROBERT (REP)": "SEN-012-DAVIES ROBERT (REP)", "SEN-014-BROWNING DEAN (REP)": "SEN-014-BROWNING DEAN (REP)", "SEN-014-MILLER NICHOLAS (DEM)": "SEN-014-MILLER NICHOLAS (DEM)", "SEN-016-COLEMAN JARRETT (REP)": "SEN-016-COLEMAN JARRETT (REP)", "SEN-016-PINSLEY MARK (DEM)": "SEN-016-PINSLEY MARK (DEM)", "SEN-018-BOSCOLA LISA (DEM)": "SEN-018-BOSCOLA LISA (DEM)", "SEN-018-MERHOTTEIN JOHN (REP)": "SEN-018-MERHOTTEIN JOHN (REP)", "SEN-020-BAKER ELISABETH (REP)": "SEN-020-BAKER ELISABETH (REP)", "SEN-020-BAKER JACLYN (DEM)": "SEN-020-BAKER JACLYN (DEM)", "SEN-022-BASSETT THOMAS (REP)": "SEN-022-BASSETT THOMAS (REP)", "SEN-022-FLYNN MARTIN (DEM)": "SEN-022-FLYNN MARTIN (DEM)", "SEN-024-DENNIN JILL (DEM)": "SEN-024-DENNIN JILL (DEM)", "SEN-024-PENNYCUICK TRACY (REP)": "SEN-024-PENNYCUICK TRACY (REP)", "SEN-026-AGOVINO FRANK (REP)": "SEN-026-AGOVINO FRANK (REP)", "SEN-026-KEARNEY TIMOTHY (DEM)": "SEN-026-KEARNEY TIMOTHY (DEM)", "SEN-028-MCCORMICK HIGGINS JUDITH (DEM)": "SEN-028-MCCORMICK HIGGINS JUDITH (DEM)", "SEN-028-PHILLIPS-HILL KRISTIN (REP)": "SEN-028-PHILLIPS-HILL KRISTIN (REP)", "SEN-030-TAYLOR CAROL (DEM)": "SEN-030-TAYLOR CAROL (DEM)", "SEN-030-WARD JUDITH (REP)": "SEN-030-WARD JUDITH (REP)", "SEN-032-STEFANO PATRICK (REP)": "SEN-032-STEFANO PATRICK (REP)", "SEN-032-VEGODA HOVIS SYDNEY (DEM)": "SEN-032-VEGODA HOVIS SYDNEY (DEM)", "SEN-034-MASSEY JAMES (DEM)": "SEN-034-MASSEY JAMES (DEM)", "SEN-034-ROTHMAN WILLIAM (REP)": "SEN-034-ROTHMAN WILLIAM (REP)", "SEN-036-AUMENT RYAN (REP)": "SEN-036-AUMENT RYAN (REP)", "SEN-038-MIZGORSKI LORI (REP)": "SEN-038-MIZGORSKI LORI (REP)", "SEN-038-WILLIAMS LINDSEY (DEM)": "SEN-038-WILLIAMS LINDSEY (DEM)", "SEN-040-BROWN ROSEMARY (REP)": "SEN-040-BROWN ROSEMARY (REP)", "SEN-040-SHUKAITIS JENNIFER (DEM)": "SEN-040-SHUKAITIS JENNIFER (DEM)", "SEN-042-FONTANA WAYNE (DEM)": "SEN-042-FONTANA WAYNE (DEM)", "SEN-044-FLORIO JESSICA (REP)": "SEN-044-FLORIO JESSICA (REP)", "SEN-044-MUTH KATIE (DEM)": "SEN-044-MUTH KATIE (DEM)", "SEN-046-BARTOLOTTA CAMERA (REP)": "SEN-046-BARTOLOTTA CAMERA (REP)", "SEN-048-CLEMENTS CALVIN (DEM)": "SEN-048-CLEMENTS CALVIN (DEM)", "SEN-048-GEBHARD CHRISTOPHER (REP)": "SEN-048-GEBHARD CHRISTOPHER (REP)", "SEN-050-BROOKS MICHELE (REP)": "SEN-050-BROOKS MICHELE (REP)", "SEN-050-CZECH RIANNA (DEM)": "SEN-050-CZECH RIANNA (DEM)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 9187, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 9145, "registered_not_positive": 9187}, "n_stations_flagged": 9187, "created_at": "2026-06-27T18:00:18.087074", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 9187}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1338463ffdbb421f88a4cb569fd7e99a", "name": "Italy 2023 local (provincial landtag) (overnight italy_bolzano_2023_provincial.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.civis.bz.it/dataset/elezioni-provinciali-2023", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CENTRO DESTRA": "CENTRO DESTRA", "DIE FREIHEITLICHEN": "DIE FREIHEITLICHEN", "ENZIAN": "ENZIAN", "FORZA ITALIA": "FORZA ITALIA", "FRATELLI DITALIA": "FRATELLI DITALIA", "F\u00dcR S\u00dcDTIROL MIT WIDMANN": "F\u00dcR S\u00dcDTIROL MIT WIDMANN", "JWA - WIRTH ANDERLAN": "JWA - WIRTH ANDERLAN", "LA CIVICA": "LA CIVICA", "LEGA SALVINI ALTO ADIGE S\u00dcDTIROL - UNITI PER LALTO ADIGE": "LEGA SALVINI ALTO ADIGE S\u00dcDTIROL - UNITI PER LALTO ADIGE", "MOVIMENTO 5 STELLE": "MOVIMENTO 5 STELLE", "PD PARTITO DEMOCRATICO - DEMOKRATISCHE PARTEI": "PD PARTITO DEMOCRATICO - DEMOKRATISCHE PARTEI", "STF S\u00dcDTIROLER FREIHEIT": "STF S\u00dcDTIROLER FREIHEIT", "SVP S\u00dcDTIROLER VOLKSPARTEI": "SVP S\u00dcDTIROLER VOLKSPARTEI", "TEAM K": "TEAM K", "VERDI GR\u00dcNE V\u00cbRC": "VERDI GR\u00dcNE V\u00cbRC", "VITA": "VITA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 117, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T18:00:12.633762", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.908, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.806, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.727, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0a644e3cdef64a3c8b6a5e6603214c75", "name": "Argentina 2023 local (overnight argentina_santafe_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.santafe.gob.ar/ms/tribunalelectoral/eleccion/elecciones-2023/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"secc": "secc", "circuito": "circuito", "UNIDOS PARA CAMBIAR SANTA FE": "UNIDOS PARA CAMBIAR SANTA FE", "JUNTOS AVANCEMOS": "JUNTOS AVANCEMOS", "VIVA LA LIBERTAD": "VIVA LA LIBERTAD", "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE TRABAJADORES": "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE TRABAJADORES", "VOTOS BLANCOS": "VOTOS BLANCOS", "VOTOS ANULADOS": "VOTOS ANULADOS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 365, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 365}, "n_stations_flagged": 365, "created_at": "2026-06-27T18:00:10.780363", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 365}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f3723a7d33bf46a1a969296a5a015a67", "name": "Argentina 2023 local (overnight argentina_cordoba_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.justiciacordoba.gob.ar/Estatico/JEL/Escrutinios/ReportesEleccion20230625/default.html", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_popular": "votes_popular", "votes_la_libertad_avanza": "votes_la_libertad_avanza", "votes_partido_humanista": "votes_partido_humanista", "votes_frente_liberal_democrata_desarrollista": "votes_frente_liberal_democrata_desarrollista", "votes_creo_en_cordoba_de_todos": "votes_creo_en_cordoba_de_todos", "votes_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_trabajadores_unidad": "votes_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_trabajadores_unidad", "votes_juntos_por_el_cambio": "votes_juntos_por_el_cambio", "votes_movimiento_al_socialismo": "votes_movimiento_al_socialismo", "votes_union_popular_federal": "votes_union_popular_federal", "votes_encuentro_vecinal_cordoba": "votes_encuentro_vecinal_cordoba", "votes_hacemos_unidos_por_cordoba": "votes_hacemos_unidos_por_cordoba"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 634, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T18:00:08.265920", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 634}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bf202c11198b45018d77312350646e66", "name": "Mexico 2024 local (overnight mexico_cdmx_2024_jefatura_gobierno_casilla.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://sicodid2024.iecm.mx/sicodid2024/jg_cdmx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"taboada_pan_pri_prd": "taboada_pan_pri_prd", "brugada_morena_pvem_pt": "brugada_morena_pvem_pt", "chertorivski_mc": "chertorivski_mc", "no_registradas": "no_registradas"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13503, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 63, "invalid_gt_cast": 551, "cast_valid_mismatch": 9331, "registered_not_positive": 44}, "n_stations_flagged": 9376, "created_at": "2026-06-27T17:59:30.397632", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 13503}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9020535e227f4285afa7aaf9eddb692d", "name": "Mexico 2024 local (overnight mexico_chiapas_2024_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://computos2024.iepc-chiapas.org/bd/20240608_2000_CHIS_COMPUTOS.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ramirez_morena_pt_pvem_coalition": "ramirez_morena_pt_pvem_coalition", "espinosa_pan_pri_prd": "espinosa_pan_pri_prd", "munoz_mc": "munoz_mc"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6906, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 710, "registered_not_positive": 62, "cast_gt_registered": 110}, "n_stations_flagged": 818, "created_at": "2026-06-27T17:59:09.553310", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6906}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7592e716d0bd44dabb8ec1e1d0300ff8", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_distrito_federal_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2022_DF.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"clementina_araujo_bagno_da_silva": "clementina_araujo_bagno_da_silva", "elziovan_matias_moreno_lima": "elziovan_matias_moreno_lima", "ibaneis_rocha_barros_junior": "ibaneis_rocha_barros_junior", "izalci_lucas_ferreira": "izalci_lucas_ferreira", "leandro_antonio_grass_peixoto": "leandro_antonio_grass_peixoto", "leila_gomes_de_barros_rego": "leila_gomes_de_barros_rego", "luiz_carlos_lucas_salles": "luiz_carlos_lucas_salles", "paulo_octavio_alves_pereira": "paulo_octavio_alves_pereira", "renan_rosa_de_arruda": "renan_rosa_de_arruda", "robson_raymundo_da_silva": "robson_raymundo_da_silva", "teodoro_antonio_da_cruz_filho": "teodoro_antonio_da_cruz_filho"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 19, "registered_not_positive": 19}, "n_stations_flagged": 19, "created_at": "2026-06-27T17:59:08.060973", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 19}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ad5cf63fccb74d00ba620a63f4cf30dc", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_mato_grosso_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2022_MT.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"mauro_mendes_44": "mauro_mendes_44", "marcia_pinheiro_43": "marcia_pinheiro_43", "marcos_ritela_14": "marcos_ritela_14", "moises_franz_50": "moises_franz_50"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 141, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 141, "cast_gt_registered": 141}, "n_stations_flagged": 141, "created_at": "2026-06-27T17:59:06.954503", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 141}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "54c73f419f874d3092ae505e68f6b3bc", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_amazonas_2022_governor_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2022_AM.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"nr_zona": "nr_zona", "nr_secao": "nr_secao", "CARLOS_EDUARDO_BRAGA_MDB": "CARLOS_EDUARDO_BRAGA_MDB", "WILSON_LIMA_UNIAO": "WILSON_LIMA_UNIAO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7453, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 7453, "registered_not_positive": 7453, "cast_gt_registered": 7453}, "n_stations_flagged": 7453, "created_at": "2026-06-27T17:58:45.926456", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7453}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3060caf07a1445de8edec90695ff4231", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_maranhao_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CARLOS BRANDAO (PSB)": "CARLOS BRANDAO (PSB)", "EDIVALDO (PSD)": "EDIVALDO (PSD)", "ENILTON RODRIGUES (PSOL)": "ENILTON RODRIGUES (PSOL)", "FRANKLE COSTA (PCB)": "FRANKLE COSTA (PCB)", "HERTZ DIAS (PSTU)": "HERTZ DIAS (PSTU)", "LAHESIO BONFIM (PSC)": "LAHESIO BONFIM (PSC)", "PROFESSOR JOAS MORAES (DC)": "PROFESSOR JOAS MORAES (DC)", "SIMPLICIO (SOLIDARIEDADE)": "SIMPLICIO (SOLIDARIEDADE)", "WEVERTON (PDT)": "WEVERTON (PDT)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 217, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T17:58:44.125125", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 217}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "57a38d696b424d39b316a8d5cd1f10af", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_para_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2022_PA.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ADOLFO_DA_COSTA_OLIVEIRA_NETO_50": "ADOLFO_DA_COSTA_OLIVEIRA_NETO_50", "JOSE_DA_CRUZ_MARINHO_22": "JOSE_DA_CRUZ_MARINHO_22", "LEONARDO_MARCONY_PEREIRA_MACEDO_77": "LEONARDO_MARCONY_PEREIRA_MACEDO_77", "HELDER_ZAHLUTH_BARBALHO_15": "HELDER_ZAHLUTH_BARBALHO_15", "JOSE_CLEBER_BARROS_RABELO_16": "JOSE_CLEBER_BARROS_RABELO_16", "PAULO_CEZAR_FIGUEIREDO_AFFONSO_36": "PAULO_CEZAR_FIGUEIREDO_AFFONSO_36", "FELIPE_AUGUSTO_FRANCISCO_BORGES_28": "FELIPE_AUGUSTO_FRANCISCO_BORGES_28", "SOFIA_DE_ALMEIDA_COUTO_35": "SOFIA_DE_ALMEIDA_COUTO_35"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18235, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 18235, "registered_not_positive": 18235}, "n_stations_flagged": 18235, "created_at": "2026-06-27T17:57:53.375370", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18235}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "29b113e9fc484567b535d534c2436eb0", "name": "India 2017 local (overnight india_uttar_pradesh_2017_vidhansabha.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2017, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Uttar_Pradesh/Uttar_Pradesh_AE.csv.gz (LokDhaba / TCPD-IED, Trivedi Centre for Political Data, Ashoka University; candidate-level, filtered Year==2017 / Assembly_No 17; compiled from ECI Statistical Report)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"constituency_no": "constituency_no", "Bharatiya Janata Party": "Bharatiya Janata Party", "Bahujan Samaj Party": "Bahujan Samaj Party", "Samajwadi Party": "Samajwadi Party", "Indian National Congress": "Indian National Congress", "Independent": "Independent", "Rashtriya Lok Dal": "Rashtriya Lok Dal", "Apna Dal (Sonelal)": "Apna Dal (Sonelal)", "Suheldev Bharatiya Samaj Party": "Suheldev Bharatiya Samaj Party", "Nirbal Indian Shoshit Hamara Aam Dal": "Nirbal Indian Shoshit Hamara Aam Dal", "Peace Party": "Peace Party", "All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen": "All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen", "Communist Party of India": "Communist Party of India", "Shiv Sena": "Shiv Sena", "None of the Above": "None of the Above", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 403, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 403}, "n_stations_flagged": 403, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:57:16.339624", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.604, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.56, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.488, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.069, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.124, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.488, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.287, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.287, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.619, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.568, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.568, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 403}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "be900fbd42b1477593f04ff88687d734", "name": "Canada 2023 local (overnight canada_nwt_2023_territorial_per_poll.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionsnwt.ca/sites/electionsnwt/files/2023_nwt_general_election_results_report_final_web_ready_0.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"declined": "declined", "Ronald Bonnetrouge": "Ronald Bonnetrouge", "Richard Lafferty": "Richard Lafferty", "Steven Vandell": "Steven Vandell", "Sheryl Yakeleya": "Sheryl Yakeleya", "Deanna Cornfield": "Deanna Cornfield", "Julian Morse": "Julian Morse", "John Stanley": "John Stanley", "Spencer Tracy": "Spencer Tracy", "Stuart Wray": "Stuart Wray", "Stacie Arden Smith": "Stacie Arden Smith", "James Lawrance": "James Lawrance", "Katrina Nokleby": "Katrina Nokleby", "Kate Reid": "Kate Reid", "Greg McMeekin": "Greg McMeekin", "RJ Simpson": "RJ Simpson", "Michael Wallington": "Michael Wallington", "Hans Wiedemann": "Hans Wiedemann", "Vince McKay": "Vince McKay", "Wally Schumann": "Wally Schumann", "Rocky Simpson": "Rocky Simpson", "Diane Archie": "Diane Archie", "Denny Rodgers": "Denny Rodgers", "Sallie Ross": "Sallie Ross", "Lenora McLeod": "Lenora McLeod", "Lesa Semmler": "Lesa Semmler", "Caitlin Cleveland": "Caitlin Cleveland", "Frederick Blake": "Frederick Blake", "George Nerysoo": "George Nerysoo", "Richard Ross": "Richard Ross", "Jane Armstrong": "Jane Armstrong", "Sharon Allen": "Sharon Allen", "Joshua Campbell": "Joshua Campbell", "Mavis Cli- Michaud": "Mavis Cli- Michaud", "Hillary Deneron": "Hillary Deneron", "Shane Thompson": "Shane Thompson", "Les Wright": "Les Wright", "Lucy Kuptana": "Lucy Kuptana", "Vince Teddy": "Vince Teddy", "Aaron Reid": "Aaron Reid", "Nicole Sok": "Nicole Sok", "Kieron Testart": "Kieron Testart", "Paulie Chinna": "Paulie Chinna", "Daniel McNeely": "Daniel McNeely", "Delphine Pierrot": "Delphine Pierrot", "Connie Benwell": "Connie Benwell", "Jay MacDonald": "Jay MacDonald", "Frieda Martselos": "Frieda Martselos", "Nadine Delorme": "Nadine Delorme", "Richard Edjericon": "Richard Edjericon", "Ambe Chenemu": "Ambe Chenemu", "Robert Hawkins": "Robert Hawkins", "Matt Spence": "Matt Spence", "Jon Howe": "Jon Howe", "Shauna Morgan": "Shauna Morgan", "Bruce Valpy": "Bruce Valpy", "Caroline Wawzonek": "Caroline Wawzonek"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 177, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 96, "cast_gt_registered": 33, "votes_gt_valid": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 99, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:57:14.356190", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.846, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.904, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.847, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.742, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.742, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.635, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.887, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 177}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d178f01ae90c45d2b20c24677bc47a29", "name": "United States 2025 local (overnight us_virginia_2025_house_of_delegates.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2025, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://enr.elections.virginia.gov/cdn/results/virginia/export-2025-November-General.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"dem": "dem", "rep": "rep", "ind": "ind", "lib": "lib", "fwd": "fwd", "writein": "writein", "other": "other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2553, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2548, "registered_not_positive": 2553}, "n_stations_flagged": 2553, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:57:05.765675", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.735, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.571, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.584, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.336, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.735, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.571, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.472, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.472, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.729, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2553}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ac39067c36684f5e91412eb73550ccd9", "name": "United States 2022 local (overnight us_ny_2022_state_assembly_precinct.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/openelections/openelections-data-ny/blob/master/2022/20221108__ny__general__precinct.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"party_A&C": "party_A&C", "party_BBN": "party_BBN", "party_CON": "party_CON", "party_DEM": "party_DEM", "party_IND": "party_IND", "party_INT": "party_INT", "party_MEF": "party_MEF", "party_NOPARTY": "party_NOPARTY", "party_R2H": "party_R2H", "party_REP": "party_REP", "party_WOR": "party_WOR", "party_WRITEIN": "party_WRITEIN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13975, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 13574, "registered_not_positive": 13975}, "n_stations_flagged": 13975, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:56:21.196592", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 13975}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a85e75495b4643c3a39a586916cf810d", "name": "Switzerland 2023 local (overnight switzerland_lucerne_kantonsrat_2023.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://wahlen.lu.ch/krat/resultate_23_{luzern_stadt|luzern_land|hochdorf|sursee|willisau|entlebuch}/parteistimmen", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"EVP": "EVP", "FDP": "FDP", "FDP Erf": "FDP Erf", "FDP Zuk": "FDP Zuk", "GLP": "GLP", "Gen. Mitte": "Gen. Mitte", "Gr\u00fcne": "Gr\u00fcne", "Gr\u00fcneKuG": "Gr\u00fcneKuG", "Gr\u00fcneUnt": "Gr\u00fcneUnt", "JG": "JG", "JGLP": "JGLP", "JMitte": "JMitte", "JSVP": "JSVP", "JUSOplus": "JUSOplus", "Mitte": "Mitte", "Mitte60+": "Mitte60+", "SP": "SP", "SP 60+": "SP 60+", "SP SE": "SP SE", "SVP": "SVP", "WTMitte": "WTMitte", "nmGr\u00fcne": "nmGr\u00fcne"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 80, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 80, "registered_not_positive": 80}, "n_stations_flagged": 80, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:56:18.191962", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.884, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.838, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.559, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 80}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bc3fcf4fd5ad4b8fa0c59c36d714875f", "name": "Italy 2023 local (overnight italy_trentino_2023_provincial.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.elezioni-2023.provincia.tn.it/Risultati/Coalizioni/{022_NNN}.html", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"DARDO ELENA": "DARDO ELENA", "DEGASPERI FILIPPO": "DEGASPERI FILIPPO", "DIVINA SERGIO": "DIVINA SERGIO", "FUGATTI MAURIZIO": "FUGATTI MAURIZIO", "MARINI ALEX": "MARINI ALEX", "RIZZO MARCO": "RIZZO MARCO", "VALDUGA FRANCESCO": "VALDUGA FRANCESCO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 166, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 166, "registered_not_positive": 166}, "n_stations_flagged": 166, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:56:16.397309", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.908, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.806, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.727, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 166}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ea8ae43b8d4c46819ff17fb995c15c32", "name": "Italy 2025 local (overnight italy_marche_2025_regional_per_sezione.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2025, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.regione.marche.it/Portals/0/Elezioni_2025/riepilogo/estrazione_con_votanti.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"valid_liste": "valid_liste", "pres_Beatrice_Marinelli": "pres_Beatrice_Marinelli", "pres_Claudio_Bolletta": "pres_Claudio_Bolletta", "pres_Francesco_Acquaroli": "pres_Francesco_Acquaroli", "pres_Francesco_Gerardi": "pres_Francesco_Gerardi", "pres_Lidia_Mangani": "pres_Lidia_Mangani", "pres_Matteo_Ricci": "pres_Matteo_Ricci", "lista_ALLEANZA_VERDI_E_SINISTRA": "lista_ALLEANZA_VERDI_E_SINISTRA", "lista_CIVICI_MARCHE_PER_ACQUAROLI": "lista_CIVICI_MARCHE_PER_ACQUAROLI", "lista_DSP_CON_MARCO_RIZZO": "lista_DSP_CON_MARCO_RIZZO", "lista_EVOLUZIONE_DELLA_RIVOLUZIONE": "lista_EVOLUZIONE_DELLA_RIVOLUZIONE", "lista_FORZA_DEL_POPOLO": "lista_FORZA_DEL_POPOLO", "lista_FORZA_ITALIA_BERLUSCONI": "lista_FORZA_ITALIA_BERLUSCONI", "lista_GIORGIA_MELONI_PER_ACQUAROLI": "lista_GIORGIA_MELONI_PER_ACQUAROLI", "lista_I_MARCHIGIANI_PER_ACQUAROLI": "lista_I_MARCHIGIANI_PER_ACQUAROLI", "lista_LEGA_SALVINI_MARCHE": "lista_LEGA_SALVINI_MARCHE", "lista_LISTA_CIVICA_MATTEO_RICCI": "lista_LISTA_CIVICA_MATTEO_RICCI", "lista_LISTE_CIVICHE_UDC": "lista_LISTE_CIVICHE_UDC", "lista_MOVIMENTO_5_STELLE_2050": "lista_MOVIMENTO_5_STELLE_2050", "lista_NOI_MODERATI_PER_ACQUAROLI": "lista_NOI_MODERATI_PER_ACQUAROLI", "lista_PACE_SALUTE_LAVORO": "lista_PACE_SALUTE_LAVORO", "lista_PCI_-_PARTITO_COMUNISTA": "lista_PCI_-_PARTITO_COMUNISTA", "lista_PD_-_PARTITO_DEMOCRATICO": "lista_PD_-_PARTITO_DEMOCRATICO", "lista_PROGETTO_AVANTI_CON_RICCI": "lista_PROGETTO_AVANTI_CON_RICCI", "lista_PROGETTO_MARCHE_VIVE": "lista_PROGETTO_MARCHE_VIVE"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1572, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 13, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1, "registered_not_positive": 13, "votes_gt_valid": 1572}, "n_stations_flagged": 1572, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:56:10.982989", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.908, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.745, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.642, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.806, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.642, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.642, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.652, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.773, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.773, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.157, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.157, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1572}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "20ccb9a485054d92b209b41cc84ed3ee", "name": "Argentina 2023 local (overnight argentina_buenos_aires_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/2023_generales_1.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE TRABAJADORES - UNIDAD": "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE TRABAJADORES - UNIDAD", "JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO": "JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO", "LA LIBERTAD AVANZA": "LA LIBERTAD AVANZA", "UNION POR LA PATRIA": "UNION POR LA PATRIA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40201, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:54:29.034391", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 40201}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c6a500a51aef48bba5289148bd532d2d", "name": "Mexico 2024 local (overnight mexico_puebla_2024_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.ieepuebla.org.mx/2025/banner/resultados/RESULTADOS_CASILLA_ELECCION_GUBERNATURA_2023_2024.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PAN": "PAN", "PRI": "PRI", "PRD": "PRD", "PT": "PT", "PVEM": "PVEM", "MC": "MC", "NAP": "NAP", "PSI": "PSI", "MORENA": "MORENA", "FXM": "FXM", "PAN_PRI_PRD_PSI": "PAN_PRI_PRD_PSI", "PAN_PRI_PRD": "PAN_PRI_PRD", "PAN_PRI_PSI": "PAN_PRI_PSI", "PAN_PRD_PSI": "PAN_PRD_PSI", "PRI_PRD_PSI": "PRI_PRD_PSI", "PAN_PRI": "PAN_PRI", "PAN_PRD": "PAN_PRD", "PAN_PSI": "PAN_PSI", "PRI_PRD": "PRI_PRD", "PRI_PSI": "PRI_PSI", "PRD_PSI": "PRD_PSI", "PT_PVEM_MORENA_NAP_FXM": "PT_PVEM_MORENA_NAP_FXM", "PT_PVEM_MORENA_NAP": "PT_PVEM_MORENA_NAP", "PT_PVEM_MORENA_FXM": "PT_PVEM_MORENA_FXM", "PT_PVEM_NAP_FXM": "PT_PVEM_NAP_FXM", "PT_MORENA_NAP_FXM": "PT_MORENA_NAP_FXM", "PVEM_MORENA_NAP_FXM": "PVEM_MORENA_NAP_FXM", "PT_PVEM_MORENA": "PT_PVEM_MORENA", "PT_PVEM_NAP": "PT_PVEM_NAP", "PT_PVEM_FXM": "PT_PVEM_FXM", "PT_MORENA_NAP": "PT_MORENA_NAP", "PT_MORENA_FXM": "PT_MORENA_FXM", "PT_NAP_FXM": "PT_NAP_FXM", "PVEM_MORENA_NAP": "PVEM_MORENA_NAP", "PVEM_MORENA_FXM": "PVEM_MORENA_FXM", "PVEM_NAP_FXM": "PVEM_NAP_FXM", "MORENA_NAP_FXM": "MORENA_NAP_FXM", "PT_PVEM": "PT_PVEM", "PT_MORENA": "PT_MORENA", "PT_NAP": "PT_NAP", "PT_FXM": "PT_FXM", "PVEM_MORENA": "PVEM_MORENA", "PVEM_NAP": "PVEM_NAP", "PVEM_FXM": "PVEM_FXM", "MORENA_NAP": "MORENA_NAP", "MORENA_FXM": "MORENA_FXM", "NAP_FXM": "NAP_FXM", "NO_REGISTRADOS": "NO_REGISTRADOS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8283, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 8283, "cast_gt_registered": 8209}, "n_stations_flagged": 8283, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:54:03.018464", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8283}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5072d95f145547fca020013cd39fbd69", "name": "Mexico 2024 local (overnight mexico_guanajuato_2024_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Garc\u00eda_PAN_PRI_PRD": "Garc\u00eda_PAN_PRI_PRD", "Alcaraz_PVEM_PT_MORENA": "Alcaraz_PVEM_PT_MORENA", "Rocha_MC": "Rocha_MC", "PAN": "PAN", "PRI": "PRI", "PRD": "PRD", "PVEM": "PVEM", "PT": "PT", "MC": "MC", "MORENA": "MORENA", "CAND_IND_1": "CAND_IND_1", "PAN_PRI_PRD": "PAN_PRI_PRD", "PAN_PRI": "PAN_PRI", "PAN_PRD": "PAN_PRD", "PRI_PRD": "PRI_PRD", "PVEM_PT_MORENA": "PVEM_PT_MORENA", "PVEM_PT": "PVEM_PT", "PVEM_MORENA": "PVEM_MORENA", "PT_MORENA": "PT_MORENA", "NoReg": "NoReg", "Nulos": "Nulos"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8166, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 8148, "cast_valid_mismatch": 578, "registered_not_positive": 1, "cast_gt_registered": 19}, "n_stations_flagged": 8148, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:53:40.438147", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8166}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "72a682830a83491caa6e8db73a5fdd60", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_goias_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2022_GO.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cand_cintia_aparecida_dias": "cand_cintia_aparecida_dias", "cand_edigar_antonio_diniz_junior": "cand_edigar_antonio_diniz_junior", "cand_gustavo_mendanha_melo": "cand_gustavo_mendanha_melo", "cand_helga_maria_martins_de_paula": "cand_helga_maria_martins_de_paula", "cand_reinaldo_assis_pantaleao": "cand_reinaldo_assis_pantaleao", "cand_ronaldo_ramos_caiado": "cand_ronaldo_ramos_caiado", "cand_vinicius_gomes_da_paixao": "cand_vinicius_gomes_da_paixao", "cand_vitor_hugo_de_araujo_almeida": "cand_vitor_hugo_de_araujo_almeida", "cand_wolmir_therezio_amado": "cand_wolmir_therezio_amado"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 246, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 246, "registered_not_positive": 246}, "n_stations_flagged": 246, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:53:37.565743", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 246}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f35932642b4b45f4b88f40d3e69bde85", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_santa_catarina_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2022_SC.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"nr_zona": "nr_zona", "nr_secao": "nr_secao", "jorginho_mello_pl": "jorginho_mello_pl", "decio_lima_pt": "decio_lima_pt"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 16242, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 16242, "cast_gt_registered": 16242, "registered_not_positive": 16242}, "n_stations_flagged": 16242, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:52:56.895327", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 16242}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4839d37a31554690a4d17af83efaca94", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_pernambuco_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"raquel_lyra_psdb": "raquel_lyra_psdb", "marilia_arraes_solidariedade": "marilia_arraes_solidariedade"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 185, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:52:53.931674", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 185}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dfbdbdb8433c4e8eaf47b9c43ec31f96", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_ceara_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2022_CE.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cand_12_ROBERTO_CLUDIO_RODRIGUES_BEZERRA": "cand_12_ROBERTO_CLUDIO_RODRIGUES_BEZERRA", "cand_13_ELMANO_DE_FREITAS_DA_COSTA": "cand_13_ELMANO_DE_FREITAS_DA_COSTA", "cand_16_JOS_BATISTA_NETO": "cand_16_JOS_BATISTA_NETO", "cand_21_FRANCISCO_RAIMUNDO_MALTA_DE_ARAJO": "cand_21_FRANCISCO_RAIMUNDO_MALTA_DE_ARAJO", "cand_44_WAGNER_SOUSA_GOMES": "cand_44_WAGNER_SOUSA_GOMES", "cand_80_SERLEY_DE_SOUSA_LEAL": "cand_80_SERLEY_DE_SOUSA_LEAL"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 184, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 184, "registered_not_positive": 184}, "n_stations_flagged": 184, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:52:52.774129", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 184}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "02dbd87111f046679b0101dff5ef7754", "name": "United States 2022 local (overnight us_colorado_2022_stateleg_precinct.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openelections/openelections-data-co/master/2022/20221108__co__general__precinct.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"house_dem": "house_dem", "house_lib": "house_lib", "house_rep": "house_rep", "house_una": "house_una", "house_upa": "house_upa", "senate_cen": "senate_cen", "senate_dem": "senate_dem", "senate_lib": "senate_lib", "senate_rep": "senate_rep"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3232, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 3182, "registered_not_positive": 3232}, "n_stations_flagged": 3232, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:16:34.246922", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3232}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4f489e64689b48938d4032d0b6f50be3", "name": "United States 2022 local (overnight us_washington_2022_legislature.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.sos.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2023-05/2022gen_precinct_results_gis-ready.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"legislative_district": "legislative_district", "cand_1_votes": "cand_1_votes", "cand_2_votes": "cand_2_votes", "cand_3_votes": "cand_3_votes"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20338, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 8, "cast_valid_mismatch": 19049, "registered_not_positive": 786, "votes_gt_valid": 20338}, "n_stations_flagged": 20338, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:15:22.027039", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 20338}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ce01382a979d4b93bd32caba61acdcdc", "name": "Austria 2025 local (overnight at_burgenland.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Austria", "year": 2025, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://wahl.bgld.gv.at/wahlen/lt20250119x.nsf  (BMI export lt2501_erg.txt + Gemeinde key/name map)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"SP\u00d6": "SP\u00d6", "\u00d6VP": "\u00d6VP", "FP\u00d6": "FP\u00d6", "GR\u00dcNE": "GR\u00dcNE", "NEOS": "NEOS", "HAUS": "HAUS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 171, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:15:17.080655", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.802, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.882, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.839, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.757, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.802, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.882, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.916, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.095, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.095, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 171}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bef189470fb24b558a0052817d1913d3", "name": "Italy 2025 local (overnight italy_calabria_2025_regional_per_sezione.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2025, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://eleapi.interno.gov.it/siel/PX/scrutiniR/DE/20251005/TE/07/RE/18", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cand_OCCHIUTO ROBERTO": "cand_OCCHIUTO ROBERTO", "cand_TOSCANO FRANCESCO": "cand_TOSCANO FRANCESCO", "cand_TRIDICO PASQUALE": "cand_TRIDICO PASQUALE", "lista_ALLEANZA VERDI E SINISTRA": "lista_ALLEANZA VERDI E SINISTRA", "lista_CASA RIFORMISTA - PER LA CALABRIA - ITALIA VIVA": "lista_CASA RIFORMISTA - PER LA CALABRIA - ITALIA VIVA", "lista_DEMOCRATICI PROGRESSISTI": "lista_DEMOCRATICI PROGRESSISTI", "lista_DEMOCRAZIA CRISTIANA UNIONE DI CENTRO": "lista_DEMOCRAZIA CRISTIANA UNIONE DI CENTRO", "lista_DEMOCRAZIA SOVRANA POPOLARE": "lista_DEMOCRAZIA SOVRANA POPOLARE", "lista_FORZA AZZURRI": "lista_FORZA AZZURRI", "lista_FORZA ITALIA": "lista_FORZA ITALIA", "lista_FRATELLI D'ITALIA - GIORGIA MELONI": "lista_FRATELLI D'ITALIA - GIORGIA MELONI", "lista_LEGA PER SALVINI CALABRIA": "lista_LEGA PER SALVINI CALABRIA", "lista_MOVIMENTO 5 STELLE 2050": "lista_MOVIMENTO 5 STELLE 2050", "lista_NOI MODERATI": "lista_NOI MODERATI", "lista_OCCHIUTO PRESIDENTE": "lista_OCCHIUTO PRESIDENTE", "lista_PARTITO DEMOCRATICO": "lista_PARTITO DEMOCRATICO", "lista_SUD CHIAMA NORD - PER LE AUTONOMIE - PARTITO ANIMALISTA": "lista_SUD CHIAMA NORD - PER LE AUTONOMIE - PARTITO ANIMALISTA", "lista_TRIDICO PRESIDENTE": "lista_TRIDICO PRESIDENTE"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2406, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 2406, "registered_not_positive": 9, "cast_gt_registered": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 2406, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:15:08.223944", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.908, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.745, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.642, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.806, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.642, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.642, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.652, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.773, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.773, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.157, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.157, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2406}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f8a6d4d7204747cd9409de9a6f46fd1c", "name": "Italy 2024 local (overnight basilicata_2024_regionali_comune.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://elezionistorico.interno.gov.it/daithome/documenti/opendata/regionali/regionali-20240421.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CAND_BARDI_VITO": "CAND_BARDI_VITO", "CAND_FOLLIA_EUSTACHIO": "CAND_FOLLIA_EUSTACHIO", "CAND_MARRESE_PIERO": "CAND_MARRESE_PIERO", "LISTA_ALLEANZA_VERDI_SINISTRA_PSI_LA_BASILICATA_POSSIBILE": "LISTA_ALLEANZA_VERDI_SINISTRA_PSI_LA_BASILICATA_POSSIBILE", "LISTA_AZIONE_CON_CALENDA": "LISTA_AZIONE_CON_CALENDA", "LISTA_BASILICATA_CASA_COMUNE": "LISTA_BASILICATA_CASA_COMUNE", "LISTA_BASILICATA_UNITA": "LISTA_BASILICATA_UNITA", "LISTA_FORZA_ITALIA": "LISTA_FORZA_ITALIA", "LISTA_FRATELLI_D_ITALIA": "LISTA_FRATELLI_D_ITALIA", "LISTA_LA_VERA_BASILICATA": "LISTA_LA_VERA_BASILICATA", "LISTA_LEGA_SALVINI_BASILICATA": "LISTA_LEGA_SALVINI_BASILICATA", "LISTA_MOVIMENTO_CINQUE_STELLE": "LISTA_MOVIMENTO_CINQUE_STELLE", "LISTA_ORGOGLIO_LUCANO": "LISTA_ORGOGLIO_LUCANO", "LISTA_PARTITO_DEMOCRATICO": "LISTA_PARTITO_DEMOCRATICO", "LISTA_UNIONE_DI_CENTRO_DEMOCRAZIA_CRISTIANA_POPOLARI_UNITI": "LISTA_UNIONE_DI_CENTRO_DEMOCRAZIA_CRISTIANA_POPOLARI_UNITI", "LISTA_VOLT_BASILICATA": "LISTA_VOLT_BASILICATA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 131, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 131, "votes_gt_valid": 131}, "n_stations_flagged": 131, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:15:06.645614", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.908, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.784, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.687, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.687, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.693, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.693, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.182, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.182, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 131}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fe3a4e69616a4514a62c9e8b7f3cf8b1", "name": "Italy 2024 local (overnight italy_abruzzo_2024_regionali_comune.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://elezionistorico.interno.gov.it/daithome/documenti/opendata/regionali/regionali-20240310.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pres_D'AMICO_LUCIANO": "pres_D'AMICO_LUCIANO", "pres_MARSILIO_MARCO": "pres_MARSILIO_MARCO", "lista_ABRUZZO INSIEME": "lista_ABRUZZO INSIEME", "lista_ALLEANZA VERDI SINISTRA - ABRUZZO PROGRESSISTA E SOLIDALE": "lista_ALLEANZA VERDI SINISTRA - ABRUZZO PROGRESSISTA E SOLIDALE", "lista_AZIONE - D'AMICO - SOCIALISTI POPOLARI RIFORMATORI": "lista_AZIONE - D'AMICO - SOCIALISTI POPOLARI RIFORMATORI", "lista_FORZA ITALIA": "lista_FORZA ITALIA", "lista_FRATELLI D'ITALIA CON GIORGIA MELONI": "lista_FRATELLI D'ITALIA CON GIORGIA MELONI", "lista_LEGA SALVINI ABRUZZO": "lista_LEGA SALVINI ABRUZZO", "lista_MARSILIO PRESIDENTE": "lista_MARSILIO PRESIDENTE", "lista_MOVIMENTO 5 STELLE": "lista_MOVIMENTO 5 STELLE", "lista_NOI MODERATI": "lista_NOI MODERATI", "lista_PARTITO DEMOCRATICO": "lista_PARTITO DEMOCRATICO", "lista_RIFORMISTI E CIVICI": "lista_RIFORMISTI E CIVICI", "lista_UNIONE DI CENTRO (UDC) - DEMOCRAZIA CRISTIANA": "lista_UNIONE DI CENTRO (UDC) - DEMOCRAZIA CRISTIANA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 305, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 305}, "n_stations_flagged": 305, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:15:04.865355", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.908, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.784, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.687, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.687, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.693, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.693, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.182, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.182, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 305}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "11585bc575df414ab18dc38b27488620", "name": "Mexico 2023 local (overnight mexico_coahuila_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://iec.org.mx/v1/images/proceso2023/computos_finales/Gubernatura2023_X_Casilla.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"pan": "pan", "pri": "pri", "prd": "prd", "pvem": "pvem", "pt": "pt", "udc": "udc", "mc": "mc", "morena": "morena", "cand_ind1": "cand_ind1", "PAN_PRI_PRD": "PAN_PRI_PRD", "PAN_PRI": "PAN_PRI", "PAN_PRD": "PAN_PRD", "PRI_PRD": "PRI_PRD", "PVEM_UDC": "PVEM_UDC", "cand_nreg": "cand_nreg"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4050, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 18, "cast_gt_registered": 26}, "n_stations_flagged": 26, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:14:52.432413", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.548, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.302, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.079, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.037, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.548, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.302, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.302, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.295, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.668, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.663, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.663, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4050}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f57192e3c8eb4af4bbf99832a8eaaf65", "name": "Mexico 2024 local (overnight mexico_jalisco_2024_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.iepcjalisco.org.mx/sites/default/files/proceso_2024/Resultados/2024_SEE_GOB_JAL_CAS.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PAN": "PAN", "PRI": "PRI", "PRD": "PRD", "PVEM": "PVEM", "PT": "PT", "MC": "MC", "MORENA": "MORENA", "HAGAMOS": "HAGAMOS", "FUTURO": "FUTURO", "PAN_PRI_PRD": "PAN_PRI_PRD", "PAN_PRI": "PAN_PRI", "PAN_PRD": "PAN_PRD", "PRI_PRD": "PRI_PRD", "PVEM_PT_MORENA_HAGAMOS_FUTURO": "PVEM_PT_MORENA_HAGAMOS_FUTURO", "PVEM_PT_MORENA_HAGAMOS": "PVEM_PT_MORENA_HAGAMOS", "PVEM_PT_MORENA_FUTURO": "PVEM_PT_MORENA_FUTURO", "PVEM_PT_MORENA": "PVEM_PT_MORENA", "PVEM_PT_HAGAMOS_FUTURO": "PVEM_PT_HAGAMOS_FUTURO", "PVEM_PT_HAGAMOS": "PVEM_PT_HAGAMOS", "PVEM_PT_FUTURO": "PVEM_PT_FUTURO", "PVEM_PT": "PVEM_PT", "PVEM_MORENA_HAGAMOS_FUTURO": "PVEM_MORENA_HAGAMOS_FUTURO", "PVEM_MORENA_HAGAMOS": "PVEM_MORENA_HAGAMOS", "PVEM_MORENA_FUTURO": "PVEM_MORENA_FUTURO", "PVEM_MORENA": "PVEM_MORENA", "PVEM_HAGAMOS_FUTURO": "PVEM_HAGAMOS_FUTURO", "PVEM_HAGAMOS": "PVEM_HAGAMOS", "PVEM_FUTURO": "PVEM_FUTURO", "PT_MORENA_HAGAMOS_FUTURO": "PT_MORENA_HAGAMOS_FUTURO", "PT_MORENA_HAGAMOS": "PT_MORENA_HAGAMOS", "PT_MORENA_FUTURO": "PT_MORENA_FUTURO", "PT_MORENA": "PT_MORENA", "PT_HAGAMOS_FUTURO": "PT_HAGAMOS_FUTURO", "PT_HAGAMOS": "PT_HAGAMOS", "PT_FUTURO": "PT_FUTURO", "MORENA_HAGAMOS_FUTURO": "MORENA_HAGAMOS_FUTURO", "MORENA_HAGAMOS": "MORENA_HAGAMOS", "MORENA_FUTURO": "MORENA_FUTURO", "HAGAMOS_FUTURO": "HAGAMOS_FUTURO", "NUM_VOTOS_CAN_NREG": "NUM_VOTOS_CAN_NREG"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10893, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 1855, "cast_gt_registered": 76, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1855, "registered_not_positive": 54}, "n_stations_flagged": 1909, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:14:12.046447", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10893}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cfdd5423cc5c4ffba1feab78fcb22c51", "name": "Mexico 2021 local (overnight mexico_nuevo_leon_2021_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://computos2021dc.ieepcnl.mx/20220107_1948_PREP_NL.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PAN": "PAN", "PRI": "PRI", "PRD": "PRD", "PVEM": "PVEM", "PT": "PT", "MC": "MC", "MORENA": "MORENA", "PANAL": "PANAL", "PES": "PES", "RSP": "RSP", "FXM": "FXM", "C_PRI_PRD": "C_PRI_PRD", "C_PVEM_PT_MORENA_PANAL": "C_PVEM_PT_MORENA_PANAL", "C_PVEM_PT_MORENA": "C_PVEM_PT_MORENA", "C_PVEM_PT_PANAL": "C_PVEM_PT_PANAL", "C_PVEM_MORENA_PANAL": "C_PVEM_MORENA_PANAL", "C_PT_MORENA_PANAL": "C_PT_MORENA_PANAL", "C_PVEM_PT": "C_PVEM_PT", "C_PVEM_MORENA": "C_PVEM_MORENA", "C_PVEM_PANAL": "C_PVEM_PANAL", "C_PT_MORENA": "C_PT_MORENA", "C_PT_PANAL": "C_PT_PANAL", "C_MORENA_PANAL": "C_MORENA_PANAL", "NO_REGISTRADOS": "NO_REGISTRADOS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7003, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 24, "cast_gt_registered": 24}, "n_stations_flagged": 24, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:13:45.835898", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.624, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.534, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7003}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f9d4cf1d82f44b3d8ae990c6dcfe75e4", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_parana_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2022_PR.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"carlos_roberto_massa_junior": "carlos_roberto_massa_junior", "roberto_requiao_de_mello_e_silva": "roberto_requiao_de_mello_e_silva", "ricardo_crachineski_gomyde": "ricardo_crachineski_gomyde", "joni_silva_correia_junior": "joni_silva_correia_junior", "angela_alves_machado": "angela_alves_machado", "viviane_motta_dias_neves": "viviane_motta_dias_neves", "solange_ferreira_bueno": "solange_ferreira_bueno", "ivan_ramos_bernardo": "ivan_ramos_bernardo", "adriano_teixeira": "adriano_teixeira"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 399, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 399, "cast_gt_registered": 399}, "n_stations_flagged": 399, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:13:43.070274", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 399}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b8b00201e68c429b8bae7ef7d39ba0d6", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_rio_grande_sul_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2022_RS.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"EDUARDO_LEITE_PSDB_45": "EDUARDO_LEITE_PSDB_45", "ONYX_LORENZONI_PL_22": "ONYX_LORENZONI_PL_22"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 497, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 497, "registered_not_positive": 497}, "n_stations_flagged": 497, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:13:40.889875", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 497}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e8306432e79d4d2c893e3da1c80ab44c", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_bahia_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2022_BA.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"JERONIMO_RODRIGUES_PT": "JERONIMO_RODRIGUES_PT", "ACM_NETO_UNIAO": "ACM_NETO_UNIAO", "VOTO_BRANCO": "VOTO_BRANCO", "VOTO_NULO": "VOTO_NULO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 417, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 417, "registered_not_positive": 417, "cast_gt_registered": 417}, "n_stations_flagged": 417, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:13:38.280107", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 417}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1a79009ffd004854943023ea8fd83bc7", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_rio_de_janeiro_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2022_RJ.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CD_MUNICIPIO": "CD_MUNICIPIO", "22": "22", "40": "40", "12": "12", "30": "30", "80": "80", "16": "16", "21": "21", "35": "35", "29": "29"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 92, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 92, "registered_not_positive": 92, "votes_gt_valid": 92}, "n_stations_flagged": 92, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:13:36.729798", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 92}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "abafc6e07cd04cfe9ca50e10022dcab6", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_minas_gerais_2022_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_secao/votacao_secao_2022_MG.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"zema_novo": "zema_novo", "kalil_psd": "kalil_psd", "viana_avante": "viana_avante", "pestana_psdb": "pestana_psdb", "lorene_psol": "lorene_psol", "tristao_pco": "tristao_pco", "indira_up": "indira_up", "renata_pcb": "renata_pcb", "vanessa_pstu": "vanessa_pstu", "lourdes_dc": "lourdes_dc"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 853, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 853, "registered_not_positive": 853}, "n_stations_flagged": 853, "created_at": "2026-06-27T16:13:33.063024", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 853}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1e92de385c8a498e89e7ae0dd46a957b", "name": "Italy 2023 local (overnight italy_fvg_2023_regionali_comune.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.dati.friuliveneziagiulia.it/w/yf6r-wchi (Voti Liste) + 5v2g-tc55 (Affluenza)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"sezioni_totali": "sezioni_totali", "voti_contestati": "voti_contestati", "ALLEANZA VERDI E SINISTRA": "ALLEANZA VERDI E SINISTRA", "AUTONOMIA RESPONSABILE": "AUTONOMIA RESPONSABILE", "AZIONE - ITALIA VIVA - +EUROPA - RENEW EUROPE": "AZIONE - ITALIA VIVA - +EUROPA - RENEW EUROPE", "FEDRIGA PRESIDENTE": "FEDRIGA PRESIDENTE", "FORZA ITALIA BERLUSCONI PER FEDRIGA PARTITO POPOLARE EUROPEO": "FORZA ITALIA BERLUSCONI PER FEDRIGA PARTITO POPOLARE EUROPEO", "FRATELLI D'ITALIA": "FRATELLI D'ITALIA", "INSIEME LIBERI": "INSIEME LIBERI", "LEGA FVG PER SALVINI PREMIER": "LEGA FVG PER SALVINI PREMIER", "MOVIMENTO 5 STELLE": "MOVIMENTO 5 STELLE", "OPEN SINISTRA FVG": "OPEN SINISTRA FVG", "PARTITO DEMOCRATICO": "PARTITO DEMOCRATICO", "PATTO PER L'AUTONOMIA": "PATTO PER L'AUTONOMIA", "SLOVENSKA SKUPNOST": "SLOVENSKA SKUPNOST"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 215, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 215, "cast_valid_mismatch": 215}, "n_stations_flagged": 215, "created_at": "2026-06-27T15:34:26.106438", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.908, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.806, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.727, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 215}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "da49802660304f35b4fac39de6c52b26", "name": "Switzerland 2023 local (overnight switzerland_geneva_2023_grandconseil.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.ge.ch/elections/20230402/GC/opendata/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"commune_id": "commune_id", "SOC": "SOC", "PLR": "PLR", "VERL": "VERL", "LJS": "LJS", "LC": "LC", "SDT": "SDT", "MCG": "MCG", "VERT": "VERT", "ERAD": "ERAD", "UDC": "UDC", "LUP": "LUP", "CIVIS": "CIVIS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 46, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 9}, "n_stations_flagged": 9, "created_at": "2026-06-27T15:34:25.160761", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.884, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.838, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.559, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 46}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e4a9d5bf675c4f8a8a480ed6a5a52144", "name": "Spain 2023 local (overnight spain_extremadura_2023_municipales_municipio.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://infoelectoral.interior.gob.es/  (Area de descargas; file 04_202305_1.zip)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"poblacion": "poblacion", "n_mesas": "n_mesas", "valid_candidaturas": "valid_candidaturas", "PARTIDO POPULAR": "PARTIDO POPULAR", "PARTIDO SOCIALISTA OBRERO ESPA\u00d1OL": "PARTIDO SOCIALISTA OBRERO ESPA\u00d1OL", "VOX": "VOX", "CIUDADANOS-PARTIDO DE LA CIUDADANIA": "CIUDADANOS-PARTIDO DE LA CIUDADANIA", "UNIDAS": "UNIDAS", "IZQUIERDA UNIDA": "IZQUIERDA UNIDA", "PODEMOS": "PODEMOS", "UNION DE CIUDADANOS INDEPENDIENTES": "UNION DE CIUDADANOS INDEPENDIENTES", "JUNTOS POR EXTREMADURA": "JUNTOS POR EXTREMADURA", "SIEMPRE DON BENITO": "SIEMPRE DON BENITO", "LEVANTA EXTREMADURA": "LEVANTA EXTREMADURA", "CACERES VIVA": "CACERES VIVA", "POR M\u00c9RIDA": "POR M\u00c9RIDA", "COLECTIVO INDEPENDIENTE OLIVERO": "COLECTIVO INDEPENDIENTE OLIVERO", "SOMOS C\u00c1CERES": "SOMOS C\u00c1CERES", "POR Y PARA MALPARTIDA": "POR Y PARA MALPARTIDA", "AHORA ZAFRA": "AHORA ZAFRA", "INDEPENDIENTES POR ALBURQUERQUE": "INDEPENDIENTES POR ALBURQUERQUE", "BADAJOZ ADELANTE": "BADAJOZ ADELANTE", "COMPROMISO POR ACEUCHAL": "COMPROMISO POR ACEUCHAL", "PARTIDO EXTREME\u00d1ISTA-EXTREME\u00d1ISTAS-PARTIDO DE LOS EXTREME\u00d1OS": "PARTIDO EXTREME\u00d1ISTA-EXTREME\u00d1ISTAS-PARTIDO DE LOS EXTREME\u00d1OS", "UNA EXTREMADURA DIGNA": "UNA EXTREMADURA DIGNA", "LIBERALES Y MORALOS": "LIBERALES Y MORALOS", "BADAJOZ 5 ESTRELLAS": "BADAJOZ 5 ESTRELLAS", "INDEPENDIENTES POR VALDELACALZADA": "INDEPENDIENTES POR VALDELACALZADA", "PLATAFORMA CIUDADANA LOCAL E INDEPENDIENTE DE LA ROCA DE LA SIERRA": "PLATAFORMA CIUDADANA LOCAL E INDEPENDIENTE DE LA ROCA DE LA SIERRA", "AGRUPACION INDEPENDIENTE POR VALENCIA DE ALCANTARA": "AGRUPACION INDEPENDIENTE POR VALENCIA DE ALCANTARA", "AVANZA MEDELLIN-YELBES": "AVANZA MEDELLIN-YELBES", "VILLALBA NOS UNE": "VILLALBA NOS UNE", "INDEPENDIENTES POR BIENVENIDA": "INDEPENDIENTES POR BIENVENIDA", "ALTERNATIVA POR ALMENDRAL": "ALTERNATIVA POR ALMENDRAL", "ALTERNATIV@S PARA LA CORONADA": "ALTERNATIV@S PARA LA CORONADA", "GRUPO INDEPENDIENTE LA CUMBRE": "GRUPO INDEPENDIENTE LA CUMBRE", "SOCIALISTAS POR VILLANUEVA": "SOCIALISTAS POR VILLANUEVA", "AGRUPACI\u00d3N DE ELECTORES ALTERNATIVA POR HIGUERA": "AGRUPACI\u00d3N DE ELECTORES ALTERNATIVA POR HIGUERA", "GRUPO INDEPENDIENTE PARA RIBERA DEL FRESNO": "GRUPO INDEPENDIENTE PARA RIBERA DEL FRESNO", "AGRUPACION INDEPENDIENTE ALDEANA": "AGRUPACION INDEPENDIENTE ALDEANA", "INDEPENDIENTES POR ALCONCHEL": "INDEPENDIENTES POR ALCONCHEL", "PARTIDO INDEPENDIENTE DE ESPARRAGOSA DE LA SERENA": "PARTIDO INDEPENDIENTE DE ESPARRAGOSA DE LA SERENA", "AGRUPACI\u00d3N INDEPENDIENTE POR CASATEJADA": "AGRUPACI\u00d3N INDEPENDIENTE POR CASATEJADA", "ALTERNATIVA POR CA\u00d1AVERAL": "ALTERNATIVA POR CA\u00d1AVERAL", "AGRUPACION DE VECINOS": "AGRUPACION DE VECINOS", "POR GUADALUPE AGRUPACION INDEPENDIENTE": "POR GUADALUPE AGRUPACION INDEPENDIENTE", "AGRUPACION DE ELECTORES UNION GRANJE\u00d1A 2023": "AGRUPACION DE ELECTORES UNION GRANJE\u00d1A 2023", "MOVIMIENTO PARRE\u00d1O": "MOVIMIENTO PARRE\u00d1O", "TORREMOCHA ADELANTE": "TORREMOCHA ADELANTE", "POR DELEITOSA": "POR DELEITOSA", "LA PARRA AVANZA": "LA PARRA AVANZA", "PARTIDO INDEPENDIENTE DE NAVATRASIERRA": "PARTIDO INDEPENDIENTE DE NAVATRASIERRA", "PLATAFORMA CIUDADANA DEL VALLE": "PLATAFORMA CIUDADANA DEL VALLE", "ALTERNATIVA POR CASAS DE DON GOMEZ": "ALTERNATIVA POR CASAS DE DON GOMEZ", "AGRUPACION DE ELECTORES INDEPENDIENTES POR TORREJON": "AGRUPACION DE ELECTORES INDEPENDIENTES POR TORREJON", "AGRUPACION INDEPENDIENTE DE CASAS DE DON GOMEZ 'TU DECIDES'": "AGRUPACION INDEPENDIENTE DE CASAS DE DON GOMEZ 'TU DECIDES'", "CONTIGO HINOJAL": "CONTIGO HINOJAL", "AGRUPACI\u00d3N DE ELECTORES DE TORRE DE SANTA MAR\u00cdA": "AGRUPACI\u00d3N DE ELECTORES DE TORRE DE SANTA MAR\u00cdA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 388, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 388}, "n_stations_flagged": 388, "created_at": "2026-06-27T15:34:23.301048", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.831, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.269, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.759, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.269, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.067, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.067, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 388}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "69e7508b34844d7a803b99ad6d78f24d", "name": "Mexico 2023 local (overnight mexico_edomex_2023_governor.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.ieem.org.mx/assets/docs/procesos-electorales/resultados/2023/RESULTADOS%20DEFINITIVOS%20%20GUBERNATURA%202023%20POR%20CASILLA.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"distrito_local": "distrito_local", "seccion": "seccion", "PAN": "PAN", "PRI": "PRI", "PRD": "PRD", "PVEM_PT_MORENA": "PVEM_PT_MORENA", "NAEM": "NAEM", "PAN_PRI_PRD_NAEM": "PAN_PRI_PRD_NAEM", "PAN_PRI_PRD": "PAN_PRI_PRD", "PAN_PRI_NAEM": "PAN_PRI_NAEM", "PAN_PRD_NAEM": "PAN_PRD_NAEM", "PRI_PRD_NAEM": "PRI_PRD_NAEM", "PAN_PRI": "PAN_PRI", "PAN_PRD": "PAN_PRD", "PAN_NAEM": "PAN_NAEM", "PRI_PRD": "PRI_PRD", "PRI_NAEM": "PRI_NAEM", "PRD_NAEM": "PRD_NAEM", "NUM_VOTOS_CAN_NREG": "NUM_VOTOS_CAN_NREG", "CAND_del_Moral_VaPorElEdomex": "CAND_del_Moral_VaPorElEdomex", "CAND_Delfina_Gomez_JHH_MORENA": "CAND_Delfina_Gomez_JHH_MORENA", "CAND_no_registrado": "CAND_no_registrado"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20446, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 20446, "cast_gt_registered": 68, "cast_valid_mismatch": 4182, "registered_not_positive": 62}, "n_stations_flagged": 20446, "created_at": "2026-06-27T15:33:24.999048", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.548, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.302, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.079, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.037, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.548, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.302, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.302, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.295, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.668, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.663, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.663, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 20446}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cf6120e2bbef47308c6dd79e62a8ec2b", "name": "Brazil 2022 local (overnight brazil_saopaulo_2022_governor_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.tse.jus.br/estatistica/sead/odsele/votacao_candidato_munzona/votacao_candidato_munzona_2022.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"tarcisio_republicanos": "tarcisio_republicanos", "haddad_pt": "haddad_pt"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 645, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 645, "registered_not_positive": 645}, "n_stations_flagged": 645, "created_at": "2026-06-27T15:33:20.257869", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 645}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "62c42b73fcde44ec974d0d13a942f2ae", "name": "Switzerland 2024 local (overnight switzerland_aargau_2024_grossrat_gemeinde.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.ag.ch/de/themen/staat-politik/wahlen-abstimmungen/wahl-und-abstimmungsresultate#/118/20241020", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"SVP": "SVP", "SP": "SP", "FDP": "FDP", "DieMitte": "DieMitte", "GR\u00dcNE": "GR\u00dcNE", "GLP": "GLP", "EVP": "EVP", "EDU": "EDU", "LOVB": "LOVB", "PPAG": "PPAG", "Fit": "Fit", "NB": "NB", "DBP": "DBP", "MASSVOLL": "MASSVOLL", "Musik": "Musik"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 197, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 197, "cast_valid_mismatch": 193}, "n_stations_flagged": 197, "created_at": "2026-06-27T15:33:17.296403", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.843, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 197}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bb1c0cf0ada049f9b3a525d06a9b3514", "name": "India 2024 local (overnight arunachal_pradesh_2024_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.eci.gov.in/AcResultGen2ndJune2024/candidateswise-S02{ac}.htm", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ac_no": "ac_no", "ADP": "ADP", "BJP": "BJP", "INC": "INC", "IND": "IND", "LJPRV": "LJPRV", "NCP": "NCP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "NPP": "NPP", "PPA": "PPA", "uncontested": "uncontested"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 60, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 60, "registered_not_positive": 60, "cast_gt_registered": 50}, "n_stations_flagged": 60, "created_at": "2026-06-27T15:33:16.345073", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.381, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.281, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.281, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 60}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b73e21581761409a9676f5c9bea3e9ec", "name": "India 2023 local (overnight india_chhattisgarh_2023_vidhansabha.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.eci.gov.in/eci-backend/public/all_files/full-statistical-reports/chhattisgarh/2023/Detailed_Results.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"acno": "acno", "AAAP": "AAAP", "AASPP": "AASPP", "AJP": "AJP", "AKNDLP": "AKNDLP", "APoI": "APoI", "ASSP": "ASSP", "BALP": "BALP", "BJP": "BJP", "BMUP": "BMUP", "BSCP": "BSCP", "BSHSP": "BSHSP", "BSP": "BSP", "CMP": "CMP", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI(M)": "CPI(M)", "CPIM": "CPIM", "CSM": "CSM", "CSP": "CSP", "FDLP": "FDLP", "GGP": "GGP", "GNASURKP": "GNASURKP", "HJP": "HJP", "HMR": "HMR", "INC": "INC", "IND": "IND", "IPBP": "IPBP", "JAC": "JAC", "JCCJ": "JCCJ", "JCGP": "JCGP", "LCPY": "LCPY", "LJP": "LJP", "LJPRV": "LJPRV", "LSMP": "LSMP", "NDS": "NDS", "NOTA": "NOTA", "NYP": "NYP", "PGSP": "PGSP", "PPID": "PPID", "PRCP": "PRCP", "PRVPOI": "PRVPOI", "PSPU": "PSPU", "RGOP": "RGOP", "RJsbhP": "RJsbhP", "RMGP": "RMGP", "RP(K)": "RP(K)", "RPI": "RPI", "RSTHNDEKD": "RSTHNDEKD", "RSTWDIBHRT": "RSTWDIBHRT", "RTORP": "RTORP", "SDP(MP)": "SDP(MP)", "SP": "SP", "SRVADID": "SRVADID", "SSBD": "SSBD", "SUCI": "SUCI", "SWAP": "SWAP", "bhmm": "bhmm", "chp": "chp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 90, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 90}, "n_stations_flagged": 90, "created_at": "2026-06-27T15:33:15.429534", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.374, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.273, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.283, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.205, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.422, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 90}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "28f8db4d147b4599948c981af7173972", "name": "United States 2022 local (overnight us_minnesota_2022_legislature.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/openelections/openelections-data-mn/blob/master/2022/20221108__mn__general__precinct.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"house_rep": "house_rep", "house_writein": "house_writein", "senate_rep": "senate_rep", "senate_dfl": "senate_dfl", "senate_writein": "senate_writein", "house_dfl": "house_dfl", "senate_wtp": "senate_wtp", "house_ia": "house_ia", "house_mip": "house_mip", "house_legal_marijuana_now": "house_legal_marijuana_now", "senate_legal_marijuana_now": "senate_legal_marijuana_now", "senate_grassroots": "senate_grassroots", "senate_libertarian": "senate_libertarian", "house_libertarian": "house_libertarian"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4103, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 4103, "cast_gt_registered": 4074}, "n_stations_flagged": 4103, "created_at": "2026-06-27T15:33:03.053172", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4103}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2ea6f7dcb67b4849ab4c59571285fd65", "name": "Austria 2024 local (overnight austria_vorarlberg_2024_landtag_gemeinde.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Austria", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://apps.vorarlberg.at/wahlen/data/LT/LT_2024-10-13.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"VP": "VP", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "FPOE": "FPOE", "SPOE": "SPOE", "NEOS": "NEOS", "WIR": "WIR", "X": "X", "KPOE": "KPOE", "ANDRS": "ANDRS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 96, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T15:33:01.334314", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.802, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.882, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.84, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.762, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.802, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.882, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.542, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.114, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 96}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bd896d44cd374a588cd02a95597d23da", "name": "Italy 2024 local (overnight italy_umbria_2024_regional_comune.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://elezionistorico.interno.gov.it/index.php?tpel=R&dtel=17/11/2024&tpa=I&tpe=R&lev1=10&ne1=10", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PROIETTI STEFANIA": "PROIETTI STEFANIA", "TESEI DONATELLA": "TESEI DONATELLA", "RIZZO MARCO": "RIZZO MARCO", "LEONARDI MARTINA": "LEONARDI MARTINA", "PAOLONE GIUSEPPE": "PAOLONE GIUSEPPE", "FIORINI ELIA FRANCESCO": "FIORINI ELIA FRANCESCO", "PASQUINELLI MORENO": "PASQUINELLI MORENO", "PIGNALBERI FABRIZIO": "PIGNALBERI FABRIZIO", "TRITTO GIUSEPPE": "TRITTO GIUSEPPE"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 92, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T15:33:00.249282", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.908, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.784, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.687, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.687, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.693, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.693, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.182, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.182, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 92}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cb82a16aded24c1da198495b4653a97f", "name": "Italy 2020 local (overnight italy_tuscany_2020_regional_per_comune.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2020, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://elezionistorico.interno.gov.it/daithome/documenti/opendata/regionali/regionali-20200920.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"BARZANTI_MARCO": "BARZANTI_MARCO", "CATELLO_SALVATORE": "CATELLO_SALVATORE", "CECCARDI_SUSANNA": "CECCARDI_SUSANNA", "FATTORI_TOMMASO": "FATTORI_TOMMASO", "GALLETTI_IRENE": "GALLETTI_IRENE", "GIANI_EUGENIO": "GIANI_EUGENIO", "VIGNI_TIZIANA": "VIGNI_TIZIANA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 273, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T15:32:58.539459", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.904, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.963, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.857, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.774, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.621, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.796, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.164, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.164, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 273}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f5e59ec7485f4a6a9702b9abf7418b25", "name": "Italy 2020 local (overnight campania_regionali_2020_per_comune.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2020, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/ondata/elezioni_2020 (regionali/output/scrutini_*.csv)  mirror of Ministero dell'Interno DAIT Eligendo official scrutini, regionali 20/09/2020", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ANGRISANO_SERGIO": "ANGRISANO_SERGIO", "CALDORO_STEFANO": "CALDORO_STEFANO", "CIARAMBINO_VALERIA": "CIARAMBINO_VALERIA", "CIRILLO_GIUSEPPE": "CIRILLO_GIUSEPPE", "DE_LUCA_VINCENZO": "DE_LUCA_VINCENZO", "GRANATO_GIULIANO": "GRANATO_GIULIANO", "SALTALAMACCHIA_LUCA": "SALTALAMACCHIA_LUCA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 550, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T15:32:56.206316", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.904, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.963, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.857, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.774, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.621, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.796, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.164, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.164, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 550}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6a7f2b64d5e1424dbef9bfd7d2ed0906", "name": "Italy 2020 local (regional president) (overnight italy_veneto_2020_regional.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2020, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://dait.interno.gov.it/documenti/opendata/regionali/regionali-20200920.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"RUBINATO SIMONETTA": "RUBINATO SIMONETTA", "ZAIA LUCA": "ZAIA LUCA", "BENVEGNU' PAOLO": "BENVEGNU' PAOLO", "LORENZONI ARTURO": "LORENZONI ARTURO", "CAPPELLETTI ENRICO": "CAPPELLETTI ENRICO", "BARTELLE PATRIZIA": "BARTELLE PATRIZIA", "GUADAGNINI ANTONIO": "GUADAGNINI ANTONIO", "SBROLLINI DANIELA": "SBROLLINI DANIELA", "GIROTTO PAOLO": "GIROTTO PAOLO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 563, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 563}, "n_stations_flagged": 563, "created_at": "2026-06-27T15:32:53.929410", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.904, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.963, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.857, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.774, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.621, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.796, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.164, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.164, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 563}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "152469fba04145db9e027a14e1069e5f", "name": "Spain 2023 local (overnight spain_cantabria_2023_parlamento_mesa.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.cantabria.es/historico-resultados-elecciones", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"municipio_code": "municipio_code", "PP": "PP", "OLA CANTABRIA": "OLA CANTABRIA", "PCTE": "PCTE", "PSC-PSOE": "PSC-PSOE", "CS": "CS", "PACMA": "PACMA", "CANTABRIA DISTINTA": "CANTABRIA DISTINTA", "PODEMOS-IU": "PODEMOS-IU", "P.R.C.": "P.R.C.", "CANTABRISTAS": "CANTABRISTAS", "VOX": "VOX", "EQUO": "EQUO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 835, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 795, "registered_not_positive": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 795, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:50:42.298263", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.831, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.269, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.759, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.269, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.067, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.067, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 835}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0febf8cd73bb454ba65e4eeaccc4121f", "name": "Spain 2023 local (autonomic regional parliament) (overnight spain_navarra_2023_parlamento_mesa.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://datosabiertos.navarra.es/dataset/be88dde7-330c-4b86-aa5c-480514608cbd/resource/56b7ce53-4881-475a-8c79-82da43cb01ed/download/escrutinio_parlamento_mesas_2023.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PPN": "PPN", "GEROA_BAI": "GEROA_BAI", "EH_BILDU": "EH_BILDU", "VOX": "VOX", "UPN": "UPN", "PUM_MAS_J": "PUM_MAS_J", "CIUDADANOS": "CIUDADANOS", "CONTIGO_ZUREKIN": "CONTIGO_ZUREKIN", "EGUZKILORE": "EGUZKILORE", "PSN-PSOE": "PSN-PSOE", "VOLUNTAD_FORAL": "VOLUNTAD_FORAL"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1004, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:50:37.834909", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.831, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.269, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.759, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.269, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.067, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.067, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1004}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bd1fefb3aba14a56ab25245f7b4c9466", "name": "India 2024 local (overnight sikkim_2024_vidhan_sabha_constituency.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.eci.gov.in/statistical-report/ae/2024/5", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ac_no": "ac_no", "SKM": "SKM", "SDF": "SDF", "BJP": "BJP", "INC": "INC", "CAPS": "CAPS", "NOTA": "NOTA", "IND": "IND", "SRPP": "SRPP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 32, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 32, "cast_valid_mismatch": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 32, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:50:36.833648", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.381, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.281, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.281, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 32}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5d9e8af1ce3a4bb3be70b8ccc63cb43c", "name": "India 2023 local (overnight india_mizoram_2023_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.eci.gov.in/eci-backend/public/all_files/full-statistical-reports/mizoram/2023/Detailed_Results.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ac_no": "ac_no", "AAAP": "AAAP", "BJP": "BJP", "INC": "INC", "IND": "IND", "MNF": "MNF", "NOTA": "NOTA", "ZPM": "ZPM"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 40}, "n_stations_flagged": 40, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:50:36.008212", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.374, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.273, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.283, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.205, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.422, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 40}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a7ef051fb47f43a781420f1097291f7f", "name": "United States 2022 local (overnight us_ohio_2022_general_assembly_precinct.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"SEN-D001 :: Robert McColley (R)": "SEN-D001 :: Robert McColley (R)", "SEN-D003 :: Tina Maharath (D)": "SEN-D003 :: Tina Maharath (D)", "SEN-D003 :: Michele Reynolds (R)": "SEN-D003 :: Michele Reynolds (R)", "SEN-D005 :: Stephen A Huffman (R)": "SEN-D005 :: Stephen A Huffman (R)", "SEN-D005 :: Nancy Kiehl (WI)*": "SEN-D005 :: Nancy Kiehl (WI)*", "SEN-D007 :: David Dallas (D)": "SEN-D007 :: David Dallas (D)", "SEN-D007 :: Steve Wilson (R)": "SEN-D007 :: Steve Wilson (R)", "SEN-D009 :: Catherine D Ingram (D)": "SEN-D009 :: Catherine D Ingram (D)", "SEN-D009 :: Orlando B Sonza Jr (R)": "SEN-D009 :: Orlando B Sonza Jr (R)", "SEN-D011 :: Tony Dia (R)": "SEN-D011 :: Tony Dia (R)", "SEN-D011 :: Paula Hicks-Hudson (D)": "SEN-D011 :: Paula Hicks-Hudson (D)", "SEN-D013 :: Anthony Eliopoulos (D)": "SEN-D013 :: Anthony Eliopoulos (D)", "SEN-D013 :: Nathan H Manning (R)": "SEN-D013 :: Nathan H Manning (R)", "SEN-D015 :: Hearcel F Craig (D)": "SEN-D015 :: Hearcel F Craig (D)", "SEN-D017 :: Garry Boone (D)": "SEN-D017 :: Garry Boone (D)", "SEN-D017 :: Shane Wilkin (R)": "SEN-D017 :: Shane Wilkin (R)", "SEN-D019 :: Andrew O Brenner (R)": "SEN-D019 :: Andrew O Brenner (R)", "SEN-D019 :: Heather M Swiger (D)": "SEN-D019 :: Heather M Swiger (D)", "SEN-D021 :: Mikhail Alterman (R)": "SEN-D021 :: Mikhail Alterman (R)", "SEN-D021 :: Kent Smith (D)": "SEN-D021 :: Kent Smith (D)", "SEN-D023 :: Nickie J Antonio (D)": "SEN-D023 :: Nickie J Antonio (D)", "SEN-D023 :: Landry M Simmons Jr (R)": "SEN-D023 :: Landry M Simmons Jr (R)", "SEN-D025 :: Bill DeMora (D)": "SEN-D025 :: Bill DeMora (D)", "SEN-D025 :: Chandler Wysocki (R)": "SEN-D025 :: Chandler Wysocki (R)", "SEN-D027 :: Patricia Goetz (D)": "SEN-D027 :: Patricia Goetz (D)", "SEN-D027 :: Kristina D Roegner (R)": "SEN-D027 :: Kristina D Roegner (R)", "SEN-D029 :: Lynn C Gorman (WI)*": "SEN-D029 :: Lynn C Gorman (WI)*", "SEN-D029 :: Kirk Schuring (R)": "SEN-D029 :: Kirk Schuring (R)", "SEN-D031 :: Al Landis (R)": "SEN-D031 :: Al Landis (R)", "SEN-D033 :: Bob Hagan (D)": "SEN-D033 :: Bob Hagan (D)", "SEN-D033 :: Michael Anthony Rulli (R)": "SEN-D033 :: Michael Anthony Rulli (R)", "HOUSE-D001 :: Dontavius Jarrells (D)": "HOUSE-D001 :: Dontavius Jarrells (D)", "HOUSE-D002 :: Latyna M Humphrey (D)": "HOUSE-D002 :: Latyna M Humphrey (D)", "HOUSE-D003 :: J Josiah Lanning (R)": "HOUSE-D003 :: J Josiah Lanning (R)", "HOUSE-D003 :: Ismail Mohamed (D)": "HOUSE-D003 :: Ismail Mohamed (D)", "HOUSE-D004 :: Mary Lightbody (D)": "HOUSE-D004 :: Mary Lightbody (D)", "HOUSE-D004 :: Jill Rudler (R)": "HOUSE-D004 :: Jill Rudler (R)", "HOUSE-D005 :: Ronald Beach IV (R)": "HOUSE-D005 :: Ronald Beach IV (R)", "HOUSE-D005 :: Richard Brown (D)": "HOUSE-D005 :: Richard Brown (D)", "HOUSE-D006 :: Adam C Miller (D)": "HOUSE-D006 :: Adam C Miller (D)", "HOUSE-D006 :: Joe Wharton (R)": "HOUSE-D006 :: Joe Wharton (R)", "HOUSE-D007 :: Allison Russo (D)": "HOUSE-D007 :: Allison Russo (D)", "HOUSE-D008 :: Beth Liston (D)": "HOUSE-D008 :: Beth Liston (D)", "HOUSE-D008 :: Zully Truemper (R)": "HOUSE-D008 :: Zully Truemper (R)", "HOUSE-D009 :: Munira Yasin Abdullahi (D)": "HOUSE-D009 :: Munira Yasin Abdullahi (D)", "HOUSE-D010 :: David A Dobos (R)": "HOUSE-D010 :: David A Dobos (R)", "HOUSE-D010 :: Russell Harris (D)": "HOUSE-D010 :: Russell Harris (D)", "HOUSE-D011 :: Anita Somani (D)": "HOUSE-D011 :: Anita Somani (D)", "HOUSE-D011 :: Omar Tarazi (R)": "HOUSE-D011 :: Omar Tarazi (R)", "HOUSE-D012 :: Matthew Briner (WI)*": "HOUSE-D012 :: Matthew Briner (WI)*", "HOUSE-D012 :: Brian Stewart (R)": "HOUSE-D012 :: Brian Stewart (R)", "HOUSE-D013 :: Keith A Davey (R)": "HOUSE-D013 :: Keith A Davey (R)", "HOUSE-D013 :: Michael J Skindell (D)": "HOUSE-D013 :: Michael J Skindell (D)", "HOUSE-D014 :: Jolene B Austin (R)": "HOUSE-D014 :: Jolene B Austin (R)", "HOUSE-D014 :: Sean P Brennan (D)": "HOUSE-D014 :: Sean P Brennan (D)", "HOUSE-D015 :: Richard Dell Aquila (D)": "HOUSE-D015 :: Richard Dell Aquila (D)", "HOUSE-D015 :: Nicholas E Phillips (WI)*": "HOUSE-D015 :: Nicholas E Phillips (WI)*", "HOUSE-D016 :: Michael Lamb (R)": "HOUSE-D016 :: Michael Lamb (R)", "HOUSE-D016 :: Bride Rose Sweeney (D)": "HOUSE-D016 :: Bride Rose Sweeney (D)", "HOUSE-D017 :: Troy J Greenfield (D)": "HOUSE-D017 :: Troy J Greenfield (D)", "HOUSE-D017 :: Thomas F Patton (R)": "HOUSE-D017 :: Thomas F Patton (R)", "HOUSE-D018 :: Darnell T Brewer (D)": "HOUSE-D018 :: Darnell T Brewer (D)", "HOUSE-D018 :: Shalira Taylor (R)": "HOUSE-D018 :: Shalira Taylor (R)", "HOUSE-D019 :: Ron Brough (R)": "HOUSE-D019 :: Ron Brough (R)", "HOUSE-D019 :: Phil Robinson (D)": "HOUSE-D019 :: Phil Robinson (D)", "HOUSE-D020 :: Terrence Upchurch (D)": "HOUSE-D020 :: Terrence Upchurch (D)", "HOUSE-D021 :: Elliot Forhan (D)": "HOUSE-D021 :: Elliot Forhan (D)", "HOUSE-D021 :: Kelly Powell (R)": "HOUSE-D021 :: Kelly Powell (R)", "HOUSE-D022 :: Juanita O Brent (D)": "HOUSE-D022 :: Juanita O Brent (D)", "HOUSE-D023 :: George M Phillips (R)": "HOUSE-D023 :: George M Phillips (R)", "HOUSE-D023 :: Daniel P Troy (D)": "HOUSE-D023 :: Daniel P Troy (D)", "HOUSE-D024 :: Dani Isaacsohn (D)": "HOUSE-D024 :: Dani Isaacsohn (D)", "HOUSE-D024 :: Adam Paul Teague Koehler (R)": "HOUSE-D024 :: Adam Paul Teague Koehler (R)", "HOUSE-D025 :: John Breadon (R)": "HOUSE-D025 :: John Breadon (R)", "HOUSE-D025 :: Cecil Thomas (D)": "HOUSE-D025 :: Cecil Thomas (D)", "HOUSE-D026 :: Sedrick Denson (D)": "HOUSE-D026 :: Sedrick Denson (D)", "HOUSE-D027 :: Rachel Baker (D)": "HOUSE-D027 :: Rachel Baker (D)", "HOUSE-D027 :: Jenn Giroux (R)": "HOUSE-D027 :: Jenn Giroux (R)", "HOUSE-D028 :: Jessica E Miranda (D)": "HOUSE-D028 :: Jessica E Miranda (D)", "HOUSE-D028 :: Chris Monzel (R)": "HOUSE-D028 :: Chris Monzel (R)", "HOUSE-D029 :: Cindy Abrams (R)": "HOUSE-D029 :: Cindy Abrams (R)", "HOUSE-D030 :: Alissa Mayhaus (D)": "HOUSE-D030 :: Alissa Mayhaus (D)", "HOUSE-D030 :: Bill Seitz (R)": "HOUSE-D030 :: Bill Seitz (R)", "HOUSE-D031 :: Rita Darrow (D)": "HOUSE-D031 :: Rita Darrow (D)", "HOUSE-D031 :: Bill Roemer (R)": "HOUSE-D031 :: Bill Roemer (R)", "HOUSE-D032 :: Matt Shaughnessy (D)": "HOUSE-D032 :: Matt Shaughnessy (D)", "HOUSE-D032 :: Bob Young (R)": "HOUSE-D032 :: Bob Young (R)", "HOUSE-D033 :: Kristopher J Anderson (R)": "HOUSE-D033 :: Kristopher J Anderson (R)", "HOUSE-D033 :: Tavia Galonski (D)": "HOUSE-D033 :: Tavia Galonski (D)", "HOUSE-D034 :: Beth A Bigham (R)": "HOUSE-D034 :: Beth A Bigham (R)", "HOUSE-D034 :: Casey Weinstein (D)": "HOUSE-D034 :: Casey Weinstein (D)", "HOUSE-D035 :: Steve Demetriou (R)": "HOUSE-D035 :: Steve Demetriou (R)", "HOUSE-D035 :: Lori O Neill (D)": "HOUSE-D035 :: Lori O Neill (D)", "HOUSE-D036 :: John Biller (WI)*": "HOUSE-D036 :: John Biller (WI)*", "HOUSE-D036 :: Addison Caruso (D)": "HOUSE-D036 :: Addison Caruso (D)", "HOUSE-D036 :: Andrea White (R)": "HOUSE-D036 :: Andrea White (R)", "HOUSE-D037 :: Megan Overman (WI)*": "HOUSE-D037 :: Megan Overman (WI)*", "HOUSE-D037 :: Tom Young (R)": "HOUSE-D037 :: Tom Young (R)", "HOUSE-D038 :: Willis E Blackshear Jr (D)": "HOUSE-D038 :: Willis E Blackshear Jr (D)", "HOUSE-D039 :: Leronda F Jackson (D)": "HOUSE-D039 :: Leronda F Jackson (D)", "HOUSE-D039 :: Phil Plummer (R)": "HOUSE-D039 :: Phil Plummer (R)", "HOUSE-D040 :: Amy Cox (D)": "HOUSE-D040 :: Amy Cox (D)", "HOUSE-D040 :: Rodney Creech (R)": "HOUSE-D040 :: Rodney Creech (R)", "HOUSE-D041 :: Nancy Larson (D)": "HOUSE-D041 :: Nancy Larson (D)", "HOUSE-D041 :: Josh Williams (R)": "HOUSE-D041 :: Josh Williams (R)", "HOUSE-D042 :: Derek Merrin (R)": "HOUSE-D042 :: Derek Merrin (R)", "HOUSE-D042 :: Erika White (D)": "HOUSE-D042 :: Erika White (D)", "HOUSE-D043 :: Michele Grim (D)": "HOUSE-D043 :: Michele Grim (D)", "HOUSE-D043 :: Wendi Hendricks (R)": "HOUSE-D043 :: Wendi Hendricks (R)", "HOUSE-D044 :: Roy G Palmer III (R)": "HOUSE-D044 :: Roy G Palmer III (R)", "HOUSE-D044 :: Elgin Rogers Jr (D)": "HOUSE-D044 :: Elgin Rogers Jr (D)", "HOUSE-D045 :: Jennifer Gross (R)": "HOUSE-D045 :: Jennifer Gross (R)", "HOUSE-D045 :: Chuck Horn (D)": "HOUSE-D045 :: Chuck Horn (D)", "HOUSE-D046 :: Thomas Hall (R)": "HOUSE-D046 :: Thomas Hall (R)", "HOUSE-D046 :: Lawrence Mulligan (D)": "HOUSE-D046 :: Lawrence Mulligan (D)", "HOUSE-D047 :: Sara Carruthers (R)": "HOUSE-D047 :: Sara Carruthers (R)", "HOUSE-D047 :: Sam Lawrence (D)": "HOUSE-D047 :: Sam Lawrence (D)", "HOUSE-D048 :: Scott Oelslager (R)": "HOUSE-D048 :: Scott Oelslager (R)", "HOUSE-D048 :: David Smith (D)": "HOUSE-D048 :: David Smith (D)", "HOUSE-D049 :: Jim Thomas (R)": "HOUSE-D049 :: Jim Thomas (R)", "HOUSE-D049 :: Thomas E West (D)": "HOUSE-D049 :: Thomas E West (D)", "HOUSE-D050 :: Reggie Stoltzfus (R)": "HOUSE-D050 :: Reggie Stoltzfus (R)", "HOUSE-D051 :: Brett Hudson Hillyer (R)": "HOUSE-D051 :: Brett Hudson Hillyer (R)", "HOUSE-D052 :: Gayle Manning (R)": "HOUSE-D052 :: Gayle Manning (R)", "HOUSE-D052 :: Regan L Phillips (D)": "HOUSE-D052 :: Regan L Phillips (D)", "HOUSE-D053 :: Marty Gallagher (R)": "HOUSE-D053 :: Marty Gallagher (R)", "HOUSE-D053 :: Joe Miller (D)": "HOUSE-D053 :: Joe Miller (D)", "HOUSE-D054 :: Bryan Burgess (D)": "HOUSE-D054 :: Bryan Burgess (D)", "HOUSE-D054 :: Dick Stein (R)": "HOUSE-D054 :: Dick Stein (R)", "HOUSE-D055 :: Scott Lipps (R)": "HOUSE-D055 :: Scott Lipps (R)", "HOUSE-D055 :: Paul Zorn (D)": "HOUSE-D055 :: Paul Zorn (D)", "HOUSE-D056 :: Joy Bennett (D)": "HOUSE-D056 :: Joy Bennett (D)", "HOUSE-D056 :: Adam Mathews (R)": "HOUSE-D056 :: Adam Mathews (R)", "HOUSE-D057 :: Jamie Callender (R)": "HOUSE-D057 :: Jamie Callender (R)", "HOUSE-D057 :: Evan Rosborough (D)": "HOUSE-D057 :: Evan Rosborough (D)", "HOUSE-D058 :: Al Cutrona (R)": "HOUSE-D058 :: Al Cutrona (R)", "HOUSE-D058 :: Wm Bruce Neff (D)": "HOUSE-D058 :: Wm Bruce Neff (D)", "HOUSE-D059 :: Greg Beight": "HOUSE-D059 :: Greg Beight", "HOUSE-D059 :: Lauren R McNally (D)": "HOUSE-D059 :: Lauren R McNally (D)", "HOUSE-D059 :: Cecil B Monroe (WI)*": "HOUSE-D059 :: Cecil B Monroe (WI)*", "HOUSE-D059 :: Eric C Ungaro": "HOUSE-D059 :: Eric C Ungaro", "HOUSE-D060 :: Kris Jordan (R)": "HOUSE-D060 :: Kris Jordan (R)", "HOUSE-D061 :: Beth Lear (R)": "HOUSE-D061 :: Beth Lear (R)", "HOUSE-D061 :: Louise Valentine (D)": "HOUSE-D061 :: Louise Valentine (D)", "HOUSE-D062 :: Brian Flick (D)": "HOUSE-D062 :: Brian Flick (D)", "HOUSE-D062 :: Jean Schmidt (R)": "HOUSE-D062 :: Jean Schmidt (R)", "HOUSE-D063 :: Adam C Bird (R)": "HOUSE-D063 :: Adam C Bird (R)", "HOUSE-D063 :: Richard J Perry (D)": "HOUSE-D063 :: Richard J Perry (D)", "HOUSE-D064 :: Vincent Peterson II (D)": "HOUSE-D064 :: Vincent Peterson II (D)", "HOUSE-D064 :: Nick Santucci (R)": "HOUSE-D064 :: Nick Santucci (R)", "HOUSE-D065 :: Jennifer Donnelly": "HOUSE-D065 :: Jennifer Donnelly", "HOUSE-D065 :: Mike Loychik (R)": "HOUSE-D065 :: Mike Loychik (R)", "HOUSE-D066 :: Christina Collins (D)": "HOUSE-D066 :: Christina Collins (D)", "HOUSE-D066 :: Sharon A Ray (R)": "HOUSE-D066 :: Sharon A Ray (R)", "HOUSE-D067 :: Drew Burge (D)": "HOUSE-D067 :: Drew Burge (D)", "HOUSE-D067 :: Melanie Miller (R)": "HOUSE-D067 :: Melanie Miller (R)", "HOUSE-D068 :: Thad Claggett (R)": "HOUSE-D068 :: Thad Claggett (R)", "HOUSE-D068 :: Daniel Crawford (WI)*": "HOUSE-D068 :: Daniel Crawford (WI)*", "HOUSE-D069 :: Kevin D Miller (R)": "HOUSE-D069 :: Kevin D Miller (R)", "HOUSE-D069 :: Charlotte Owens (D)": "HOUSE-D069 :: Charlotte Owens (D)", "HOUSE-D070 :: Brian Lampton (R)": "HOUSE-D070 :: Brian Lampton (R)", "HOUSE-D070 :: Eric Price (D)": "HOUSE-D070 :: Eric Price (D)", "HOUSE-D071 :: Bill Dean (R)": "HOUSE-D071 :: Bill Dean (R)", "HOUSE-D071 :: James Harvey Duffee (D)": "HOUSE-D071 :: James Harvey Duffee (D)", "HOUSE-D072 :: Kathleen Clyde (D)": "HOUSE-D072 :: Kathleen Clyde (D)", "HOUSE-D072 :: Gail Pavliga (R)": "HOUSE-D072 :: Gail Pavliga (R)", "HOUSE-D073 :: Jeff LaRe (R)": "HOUSE-D073 :: Jeff LaRe (R)", "HOUSE-D074 :: Daniel Saks (D)": "HOUSE-D074 :: Daniel Saks (D)", "HOUSE-D074 :: Bernard Willis (R)": "HOUSE-D074 :: Bernard Willis (R)", "HOUSE-D075 :: Haraz N Ghanbari (R)": "HOUSE-D075 :: Haraz N Ghanbari (R)", "HOUSE-D075 :: Jan K Materni (D)": "HOUSE-D075 :: Jan K Materni (D)", "HOUSE-D076 :: Marilyn S John (R)": "HOUSE-D076 :: Marilyn S John (R)", "HOUSE-D077 :: Mark D Gooch (D)": "HOUSE-D077 :: Mark D Gooch (D)", "HOUSE-D077 :: Scott Wiggam (R)": "HOUSE-D077 :: Scott Wiggam (R)", "HOUSE-D078 :: Susan Manchester (R)": "HOUSE-D078 :: Susan Manchester (R)", "HOUSE-D079 :: Taylor Eastham (D)": "HOUSE-D079 :: Taylor Eastham (D)", "HOUSE-D079 :: Monica Robb Blasdel (R)": "HOUSE-D079 :: Monica Robb Blasdel (R)", "HOUSE-D079 :: John P Williams (WI)*": "HOUSE-D079 :: John P Williams (WI)*", "HOUSE-D080 :: Jena Powell (R)": "HOUSE-D080 :: Jena Powell (R)", "HOUSE-D080 :: Melissa Van Dyke (WI)*": "HOUSE-D080 :: Melissa Van Dyke (WI)*", "HOUSE-D081 :: James M Hoops (R)": "HOUSE-D081 :: James M Hoops (R)", "HOUSE-D082 :: Roy W Klopfenstein (R)": "HOUSE-D082 :: Roy W Klopfenstein (R)", "HOUSE-D082 :: Magdalene Markward (D)": "HOUSE-D082 :: Magdalene Markward (D)", "HOUSE-D083 :: Jon Cross (R)": "HOUSE-D083 :: Jon Cross (R)", "HOUSE-D083 :: Claire Osborne (D)": "HOUSE-D083 :: Claire Osborne (D)", "HOUSE-D084 :: Angela N King (R)": "HOUSE-D084 :: Angela N King (R)", "HOUSE-D084 :: Sophia Rodriguez (D)": "HOUSE-D084 :: Sophia Rodriguez (D)", "HOUSE-D085 :: Tim Barhorst (R)": "HOUSE-D085 :: Tim Barhorst (R)", "HOUSE-D086 :: Barbara A Luke (D)": "HOUSE-D086 :: Barbara A Luke (D)", "HOUSE-D086 :: Tracy Richardson (R)": "HOUSE-D086 :: Tracy Richardson (R)", "HOUSE-D087 :: Riordan T McClain (R)": "HOUSE-D087 :: Riordan T McClain (R)", "HOUSE-D088 :: Gary Click (R)": "HOUSE-D088 :: Gary Click (R)", "HOUSE-D088 :: Dianne Selvey (D)": "HOUSE-D088 :: Dianne Selvey (D)", "HOUSE-D089 :: Jim Obergefell (D)": "HOUSE-D089 :: Jim Obergefell (D)", "HOUSE-D089 :: D J Swearingen (R)": "HOUSE-D089 :: D J Swearingen (R)", "HOUSE-D090 :: Brian Baldridge (R)": "HOUSE-D090 :: Brian Baldridge (R)", "HOUSE-D090 :: Andrew Dodson (D)": "HOUSE-D090 :: Andrew Dodson (D)", "HOUSE-D091 :: Bob Peterson (R)": "HOUSE-D091 :: Bob Peterson (R)", "HOUSE-D092 :: Mark Johnson (R)": "HOUSE-D092 :: Mark Johnson (R)", "HOUSE-D093 :: Jason Stephens (R)": "HOUSE-D093 :: Jason Stephens (R)", "HOUSE-D094 :: Tanya Conrath (D)": "HOUSE-D094 :: Tanya Conrath (D)", "HOUSE-D094 :: Jay Edwards (R)": "HOUSE-D094 :: Jay Edwards (R)", "HOUSE-D095 :: Don Jones (R)": "HOUSE-D095 :: Don Jones (R)", "HOUSE-D095 :: William D Ryan (D)": "HOUSE-D095 :: William D Ryan (D)", "HOUSE-D096 :: Charlie DiPalma (D)": "HOUSE-D096 :: Charlie DiPalma (D)", "HOUSE-D096 :: Ron Ferguson (R)": "HOUSE-D096 :: Ron Ferguson (R)", "HOUSE-D097 :: Adam Holmes (R)": "HOUSE-D097 :: Adam Holmes (R)", "HOUSE-D098 :: Annie Homstad (WI)*": "HOUSE-D098 :: Annie Homstad (WI)*", "HOUSE-D098 :: Darrell D Kick (R)": "HOUSE-D098 :: Darrell D Kick (R)", "HOUSE-D099 :: Sarah Fowler Arthur (R)": "HOUSE-D099 :: Sarah Fowler Arthur (R)", "HOUSE-D099 :: Kathy Zappitello (D)": "HOUSE-D099 :: Kathy Zappitello (D)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8933, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 8884}, "n_stations_flagged": 8884, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:50:00.778719", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8933}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d7f06c66adac4211b5014601cb010baa", "name": "United States 2022 local (overnight us_texas_2022_legislature_precinct.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openelections/openelections-data-tx/master/2022/20221108__tx__general__precinct.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"under_votes": "under_votes", "over_votes": "over_votes", "DEM": "DEM", "REP": "REP", "LIB": "LIB", "IND": "IND", "OTH": "OTH"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3349, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3024, "registered_not_positive": 11, "cast_gt_registered": 5, "votes_gt_valid": 2635}, "n_stations_flagged": 3034, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:49:48.388490", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3349}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6f73e7bd6bd34e61b6e529877cb9605d", "name": "Switzerland 2023 local (overnight switzerland_ticino_2023.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www2.ti.ch/cantonali-2023/risultati-nei-comuni", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"01 Partito liberale radicale ticinese (PLR)": "01 Partito liberale radicale ticinese (PLR)", "02 MPS-Indipendenti": "02 MPS-Indipendenti", "03 PVL e Giovani Verdi Liberali (PVL e GVL)": "03 PVL e Giovani Verdi Liberali (PVL e GVL)", "04 Pi\u00f9 Donne": "04 Pi\u00f9 Donne", "05 Partito Comunista \u2013 Partito Operaio e Popolare (PC-POP)": "05 Partito Comunista \u2013 Partito Operaio e Popolare (PC-POP)", "06 Avanti con Ticino & Lavoro": "06 Avanti con Ticino & Lavoro", "07 il Centro + Giovani del Centro": "07 il Centro + Giovani del Centro", "08 HelvEthica Ticino": "08 HelvEthica Ticino", "11 UDC": "11 UDC", "12 Partito Socialista, Giovent\u00f9 Socialista e Forum Alternativo": "12 Partito Socialista, Giovent\u00f9 Socialista e Forum Alternativo", "13 Lega dei Ticinesi": "13 Lega dei Ticinesi", "14 Verdi del Ticino": "14 Verdi del Ticino", "15 DIGNIT\u00c0 ai PENSIONATI": "15 DIGNIT\u00c0 ai PENSIONATI", "16 Movimento MontagnaViva": "16 Movimento MontagnaViva", "99 Schede senza intestazione": "99 Schede senza intestazione"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 106, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:49:46.699660", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.884, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.838, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.559, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 106}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "54800aaf8bbd4f37bda269d312018305", "name": "Switzerland 2022 local (overnight switzerland_bern_2022_grossrat.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Die_Mitte": "Die_Mitte", "Diverse": "Diverse", "EDU": "EDU", "EVP": "EVP", "FDP": "FDP", "Gruene": "Gruene", "PSA": "PSA", "SP": "SP", "SVP": "SVP", "GLP": "GLP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 334, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 334}, "n_stations_flagged": 334, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:49:45.014974", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.848, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.02, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 334}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1641c5a6660d48b0bed81e6522f6b65d", "name": "Austria 2022 local (overnight austria_tyrol_2022_landtag_sprengel.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Austria", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://wahlen.tirol.gv.at/landtagswahl_2022/dokumente/wahl62_sprengel.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"OVP_MATTLE": "OVP_MATTLE", "SPO": "SPO", "FPO": "FPO", "GRUNE": "GRUNE", "FRITZ": "FRITZ", "NEOS": "NEOS", "MFG": "MFG", "KPO": "KPO", "MACH_MIT": "MACH_MIT"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 779, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 771, "registered_not_positive": 779}, "n_stations_flagged": 779, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:49:42.281206", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.804, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.887, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.841, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.762, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.295, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.739, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.917, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.107, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.107, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 779}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e821755c770a4bf48d8e70f98c543eba", "name": "Austria 2023 local (overnight salzburg_2023_landtag_gemeinde.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Austria", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.salzburg.gv.at/stat/wahlen/ltw/download/LTW-2023.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"OEVP": "OEVP", "SPOE": "SPOE", "FPOE": "FPOE", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "NEOS": "NEOS", "KPOE_Plus": "KPOE_Plus", "WIRS": "WIRS", "MFG": "MFG"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 119, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:49:41.286727", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.804, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.887, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.848, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.775, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.295, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.105, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.105, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 119}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4d2c242afb1d4e78acbc6b9eb7b62da8", "name": "Austria 2023 local (overnight austria_lower_austria_2023.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Austria", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.noe.gv.at/wahlen/lw23.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"OEVP": "OEVP", "SPOE": "SPOE", "FPOE": "FPOE", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "NEOS": "NEOS", "MFG": "MFG", "KPOE": "KPOE", "ZIEL": "ZIEL"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 573, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:49:38.887401", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.804, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.887, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.848, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.775, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.295, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.105, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.105, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 573}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fa896b649aee46a99b21eda58755efd9", "name": "Italy 2022 local (overnight italy_sicily_2022_regional_per_comune.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "http://www.elezioni.regione.sicilia.it/regionali2022/rep_13/votiComunaliListeProvincialiHome.html", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AUTONOMIA_SICILIANA": "AUTONOMIA_SICILIANA", "AZIONE_-_ITALIA_VIVA_-_CALENDA": "AZIONE_-_ITALIA_VIVA_-_CALENDA", "BASTA_MAFIE": "BASTA_MAFIE", "CENTO_PASSI_PER_LA_SICILIA": "CENTO_PASSI_PER_LA_SICILIA", "DC_DEMOCRAZIA_CRISTIANA": "DC_DEMOCRAZIA_CRISTIANA", "DE_LUCA_SINDACO_DI_SICILIA_-_SUD_CHIAMA_NORD": "DE_LUCA_SINDACO_DI_SICILIA_-_SUD_CHIAMA_NORD", "FORZA_ITALIA": "FORZA_ITALIA", "FRATELLI_DITALIA": "FRATELLI_DITALIA", "GIOVANI_SICILIANI": "GIOVANI_SICILIANI", "IMPRESA_SICILIA": "IMPRESA_SICILIA", "LAVORO_IN_SICILIA": "LAVORO_IN_SICILIA", "MOVIMENTO_5_STELLE_2050": "MOVIMENTO_5_STELLE_2050", "ORGOGLIO_SICULO_CON_CATENO": "ORGOGLIO_SICULO_CON_CATENO", "PARTITO_DEMOCRATICO": "PARTITO_DEMOCRATICO", "POPOLARI_E_AUTONOMISTI": "POPOLARI_E_AUTONOMISTI", "PRIMA_LITALIA_-_SALVINI_PREMIER": "PRIMA_LITALIA_-_SALVINI_PREMIER", "SICILIA_VERA": "SICILIA_VERA", "SICILIANI_LIBERI": "SICILIANI_LIBERI", "TERRA_DAMURI": "TERRA_DAMURI"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 391, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 391, "registered_not_positive": 391}, "n_stations_flagged": 391, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:49:37.064156", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.908, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.842, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.763, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.924, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.134, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 391}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a7df29b1842b4b379d729bb22ca8c38f", "name": "Italy 2024 local (overnight italy_liguria_2024_regional.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://dait.interno.gov.it/documenti/opendata/regionali/regionali-20241027.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Bucci_Marco": "Bucci_Marco", "Cella_Maria_Antonietta": "Cella_Maria_Antonietta", "Felice_Davide": "Felice_Davide", "Ferrando_Marco_Giuseppe": "Ferrando_Marco_Giuseppe", "Morra_Nicola": "Morra_Nicola", "Orlando_Andrea": "Orlando_Andrea", "Rollando_Nicola": "Rollando_Nicola", "Rosson_Alessandro": "Rosson_Alessandro", "Toscano_Francesco": "Toscano_Francesco"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1785, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 10, "registered_not_positive": 7}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:49:31.261327", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.908, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.784, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.687, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.687, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.693, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.693, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.182, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.182, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1785}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d4cc12156ee84100a33dd743bdc0a979", "name": "India 2018 local (overnight india_tripura_2018_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2018, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://lokdhaba.ashoka.edu.in/downloads/Tripura/Tripura_AE.csv.gz", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Constituency_No": "Constituency_No", "party_AIFB": "party_AIFB", "party_AITC": "party_AITC", "party_AMB": "party_AMB", "party_BJP": "party_BJP", "party_CPI": "party_CPI", "party_CPIMLL": "party_CPIMLL", "party_CPM": "party_CPM", "party_INC": "party_INC", "party_IND": "party_IND", "party_INPT": "party_INPT", "party_IPFT": "party_IPFT", "party_NEINDP": "party_NEINDP", "party_NOTA": "party_NOTA", "party_RPI": "party_RPI", "party_RSP": "party_RSP", "party_SUCI": "party_SUCI", "party_TLSP": "party_TLSP", "party_TRIPP": "party_TRIPP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 60, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 60}, "n_stations_flagged": 60, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:07:19.766176", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.604, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.56, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.482, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.363, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.069, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.482, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.482, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.363, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.277, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.277, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.623, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.546, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.546, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 60}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "28d65eaa270243af8c131689612b203d", "name": "Spain 2023 local (overnight spain_murcia_2023_asamblea_municipio.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://econet.carm.es/web/crem/inicio/-/crem/sicrem/PU2077/excel/sec53_c{1..46}.xls (CREM 'ELECCIONES AUTONOMICAS. MAYO 2023. 3. Resultados por municipios'); linked from official portal elecciones2023.carm.es", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PP": "PP", "PSOE": "PSOE", "VOX": "VOX", "Podemos +IU-Verdes + AV": "Podemos +IU-Verdes + AV", "MC REG": "MC REG", "Cs": "Cs", "MR-VE": "MR-VE", "PACMA": "PACMA", "POR MI REGION": "POR MI REGION", "3e": "3e", "ML": "ML", "VALORES": "VALORES", "P.C.P.E.": "P.C.P.E.", "FE de las JONS": "FE de las JONS", "PCAN": "PCAN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 46, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:07:18.171238", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.831, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.269, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.759, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.269, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.067, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.067, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 46}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f316f19c62294bbcb5393542360fa026", "name": "Spain 2023 local (autonomic regional parliament) (overnight spain_la_rioja_2023_parlamento.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://flo.uri.sh/visualisation/20201351/embed (Flourish CDN visualisation '2023 Votos municipal', embedded by the official Gobierno de La Rioja / Riojastat election portal larioja.org procesos-electorales page; Flourish story 2703179)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PP": "PP", "PSOE": "PSOE", "VOX": "VOX", "PODEMOS-IU": "PODEMOS-IU", "PR+E": "PR+E", "PLRi": "PLRi", "Cs": "Cs", "PACMA": "PACMA", "VINEA": "VINEA", "ESCA\u00d1OS EN BLANCO": "ESCA\u00d1OS EN BLANCO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 175, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:07:16.527330", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.831, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.269, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.759, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.269, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.067, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.067, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 175}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "528887804f054e64acd308230f83f379", "name": "Spain 2023 local (overnight spain_castilla_la_mancha_2023.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://elecciones2023.castillalamancha.es/sites/default/files/2023-06/ResultadosprovisionalesCLMbis.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PSOE": "PSOE", "PP": "PP", "VOX": "VOX", "Cs": "Cs", "PACMA": "PACMA", "UNIDAS_PODEMOS_CLM": "UNIDAS_PODEMOS_CLM", "PAIS_CON_GESTORES": "PAIS_CON_GESTORES", "MAS_CU_EV": "MAS_CU_EV", "Tupatria": "Tupatria", "PCAS_TC_RC": "PCAS_TC_RC", "ESPANA_VACIADA": "ESPANA_VACIADA", "AQUI_AHORA": "AQUI_AHORA", "PCPE": "PCPE"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3068, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:07:06.666105", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.831, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.269, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.759, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.269, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.067, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.067, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3068}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "de3c228d521f44d1945598f64cab9546", "name": "United States 2022 local (overnight us_arizona_2022_state_house_precinct.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/openelections/openelections-data-az/blob/master/2022/20221108__az__general__precinct.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"DEM": "DEM", "OTH": "OTH", "REP": "REP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 773, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 732, "registered_not_positive": 10, "cast_gt_registered": 52}, "n_stations_flagged": 768, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:07:02.935967", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 773}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e81e913f17a74c8fa5d48d3b1e47d42f", "name": "India 2024 local (state legislative assembly / vidhan sabha) (overnight odisha_2024_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data-analytics.github.io/Election_Data_2024/odisha_counting.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AC_NO": "AC_NO", "nota_votes": "nota_votes", "AAP": "AAP", "AIFB": "AIFB", "AP": "AP", "API": "API", "BJD": "BJD", "BJP": "BJP", "BSP": "BSP", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI(M)": "CPI(M)", "CPI(M)(L)": "CPI(M)(L)", "CPI(M)(R)": "CPI(M)(R)", "INC": "INC", "IND": "IND", "JHP": "JHP", "JMM": "JMM", "KP": "KP", "KS": "KS", "NAP": "NAP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "OPD": "OPD", "Others": "Others", "PVP": "PVP", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "SP": "SP", "SUCI": "SUCI"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 147, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 147, "registered_not_positive": 147, "votes_gt_valid": 147}, "n_stations_flagged": 147, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:07:00.210930", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.381, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.281, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.281, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 147}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4de0f7d9caf248c093ac94755e393a61", "name": "India 2023 local (state legislative assembly) (overnight india_nagaland_2023_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ac_no": "ac_no", "Bharatiya Janata Party": "Bharatiya Janata Party", "Communist Party of India": "Communist Party of India", "Independent": "Independent", "Indian National Congress": "Indian National Congress", "Janata Dal (United)": "Janata Dal (United)", "Lok Janshakti Party(Ram Vilas)": "Lok Janshakti Party(Ram Vilas)", "Naga Peoples Front": "Naga Peoples Front", "National People's Party": "National People's Party", "Nationalist Congress Party": "Nationalist Congress Party", "Nationalist Democratic Progressive Party": "Nationalist Democratic Progressive Party", "None of the Above": "None of the Above", "Rashtriya Janata Dal": "Rashtriya Janata Dal", "Republican Party of India (Athawale)": "Republican Party of India (Athawale)", "Rising People\u2019s Party": "Rising People\u2019s Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 60, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 60, "cast_gt_registered": 59, "votes_gt_valid": 60}, "n_stations_flagged": 60, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:06:58.794179", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.374, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.273, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.283, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.205, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.422, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 60}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e639b7d14f4e493e88a306c0590a2556", "name": "India 2023 local (overnight india_meghalaya_2023_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thecont1/india-votes-data/main/data/csv/2023Assembly-ML.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"constituency_no": "constituency_no", "All_India_Trinamool_Congress": "All_India_Trinamool_Congress", "Bharatiya_Janata_Party": "Bharatiya_Janata_Party", "Gana_Suraksha_Party": "Gana_Suraksha_Party", "Garo_National_Council": "Garo_National_Council", "Hill_State_People_s_Democratic_Party": "Hill_State_People_s_Democratic_Party", "Independent": "Independent", "Indian_National_Congress": "Indian_National_Congress", "Janata_Dal_United": "Janata_Dal_United", "National_People_s_Party": "National_People_s_Party", "None_of_the_Above": "None_of_the_Above", "People_s_Democratic_Front": "People_s_Democratic_Front", "Republican_Party_of_India": "Republican_Party_of_India", "Republican_Party_of_India_A": "Republican_Party_of_India_A", "United_Democratic_Party": "United_Democratic_Party", "Voice_of_the_People_Party": "Voice_of_the_People_Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 59, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 59, "registered_not_positive": 59, "cast_gt_registered": 59}, "n_stations_flagged": 59, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:06:57.166350", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.374, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.273, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.283, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.205, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.422, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 59}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "484d058ddcfb4c219e9f1e9b8a781374", "name": "Austria 2021 local (overnight austria_upper_austria_2021_landtag.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Austria", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://e-gov.ooe.gv.at/at.gv.ooe.ogd2-citi/api/file/UtI6AVQk0j_3n-gZSLGDQQ/stat_download_lw21.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u00d6VP": "\u00d6VP", "FP\u00d6": "FP\u00d6", "SP\u00d6": "SP\u00d6", "GR\u00dcNE": "GR\u00dcNE", "NEOS": "NEOS", "MFG": "MFG", "KP\u00d6": "KP\u00d6", "BESTE": "BESTE", "UBB": "UBB", "CP\u00d6": "CP\u00d6", "R": "R"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 438, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:06:54.857113", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.881, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.854, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.784, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.325, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.754, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.105, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.105, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 438}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9f302a9ca57e4d99be72f299d20cf45b", "name": "Belgium 2024 local (overnight belgium-brussels-2024.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Belgium", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://api.electionresults.belgium.be/election-level?ElectionDates=2024-06-09 (Types=ParlementBrussels, description=Municipality); detail /election-level/{id}", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"nis_code": "nis_code", "VLAAMS BELANG": "VLAAMS BELANG", "MR": "MR", "open vld": "open vld", "PS": "PS", "Volt Europa": "Volt Europa", "LES ENGAG\u00c9S": "LES ENGAG\u00c9S", "PTB": "PTB", "N-VA": "N-VA", "D\u00e9FI": "D\u00e9FI", "ECOLO": "ECOLO", "GROEN": "GROEN", "CD&V": "CD&V", "Voor U": "Voor U", "Team Fouad Ahidar": "Team Fouad Ahidar", "COLLECTIF CITOYEN": "COLLECTIF CITOYEN", "Vooruit_brussels": "Vooruit_brussels", "PVDA": "PVDA", "Volt Europa - NL": "Volt Europa - NL", "PLAN B": "PLAN B", "TRANSPARENCE": "TRANSPARENCE", "VIVA PALESTINA!": "VIVA PALESTINA!"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 19, "cast_gt_registered": 19, "registered_not_positive": 19}, "n_stations_flagged": 19, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:06:53.546868", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.873, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.891, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.81, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.794, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.321, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.08, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.031, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.031, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.969, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 19}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b815c6dc603945f58dbdd41d7358892b", "name": "Switzerland 2022 local (overnight switzerland_vaud_2022_grand_conseil.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.elections.vd.ch/votelec/app16/data/VDGC20220320/results.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"null": "null", "ACDC": "ACDC", "AdLiberts": "AdLiberts", "CS": "CS", "Centre_PEV": "Centre_PEV", "Centre_UDF": "Centre_UDF", "Indpendants_VD": "Indpendants_VD", "LAurore": "LAurore", "LC_L": "LC_L", "Le_Centre": "Le_Centre", "Les_Libres": "Les_Libres", "Les_Vertes": "Les_Vertes", "PEV": "PEV", "PEV_UDF": "PEV_UDF", "PLR": "PLR", "POP": "POP", "PPVD": "PPVD", "PS": "PS", "PVL": "PVL", "PVL_et_LC": "PVL_et_LC", "PdR_Les_Libres": "PdR_Les_Libres", "Sans_denom": "Sans_denom", "SetE": "SetE", "UDC": "UDC", "UDC_UDF": "UDC_UDF", "UDF": "UDF", "da_EG": "da_EG", "sol_POP": "sol_POP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 300, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 300}, "n_stations_flagged": 300, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:06:51.028269", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.848, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.02, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 300}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fb2120e2aced4596a0977d6a13f3f2df", "name": "Italy 2024 local (overnight italy_piemonte_2024_regional_comune.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://elezionistorico.interno.gov.it/daithome/documenti/opendata/regionali/regionali-20240609.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cand_CIRIO ALBERTO": "cand_CIRIO ALBERTO", "cand_COSTANZO ALBERTO": "cand_COSTANZO ALBERTO", "cand_DISABATO SARAH": "cand_DISABATO SARAH", "cand_FREDIANI FRANCESCA": "cand_FREDIANI FRANCESCA", "cand_PENTENERO GIOVANNA": "cand_PENTENERO GIOVANNA", "lista_ALLEANZA_VERDI_E_SINISTRA": "lista_ALLEANZA_VERDI_E_SINISTRA", "lista_FORZA_ITALIA_PPE_-_UDC_-_PLI": "lista_FORZA_ITALIA_PPE_-_UDC_-_PLI", "lista_FRATELLI_D'ITALIA": "lista_FRATELLI_D'ITALIA", "lista_LEGA_SALVINI_PIEMONTE": "lista_LEGA_SALVINI_PIEMONTE", "lista_LIBERTA'_PIEMONTE": "lista_LIBERTA'_PIEMONTE", "lista_LISTA_CIVICA_CIRIO_PRESIDENTE": "lista_LISTA_CIVICA_CIRIO_PRESIDENTE", "lista_LISTA_CIVICA_PENTENERO_PRESIDENTE": "lista_LISTA_CIVICA_PENTENERO_PRESIDENTE", "lista_LISTA_CIVICA_PIEMONTE_AMBIENTALISTA_E_SOLIDALE": "lista_LISTA_CIVICA_PIEMONTE_AMBIENTALISTA_E_SOLIDALE", "lista_MOVIMENTO_5_STELLE": "lista_MOVIMENTO_5_STELLE", "lista_NOI_MODERATI": "lista_NOI_MODERATI", "lista_PARTITO_DEMOCRATICO": "lista_PARTITO_DEMOCRATICO", "lista_PIEMONTE_POPOLARE": "lista_PIEMONTE_POPOLARE", "lista_STATI_UNITI_D'EUROPA_PER_IL_PIEMONTE": "lista_STATI_UNITI_D'EUROPA_PER_IL_PIEMONTE"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1180, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1180, "votes_gt_valid": 1180}, "n_stations_flagged": 1180, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:06:46.000621", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.908, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.784, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.687, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.687, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.693, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.693, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.182, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.182, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1180}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "629112fbd8804bceadfae49270244f5e", "name": "Italy 2024 local (overnight italy_emilia_romagna_2024_regional_per_sezione.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://statistica.regione.emilia-romagna.it/dati/rappresentazioni-grafiche-dati/visualizzazione-elezioni-regionali-2024-emilia-romagna-risultati/visualizzazione-elezioni-regionali-2024-emilia-romagna-risultati-dati/elezioni-regionali-2024-emilia-romagna-voti-alle-liste.csv/@@download/file", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ALLEANZA VERDI E SINISTRA - COALIZIONI CIVICHE - POSSIBILE": "ALLEANZA VERDI E SINISTRA - COALIZIONI CIVICHE - POSSIBILE", "CIVICI, CON DE PASCALE PRESIDENTE": "CIVICI, CON DE PASCALE PRESIDENTE", "EMILIA-ROMAGNA PER LA PACE, L AMBIENTE E IL LAVORO": "EMILIA-ROMAGNA PER LA PACE, L AMBIENTE E IL LAVORO", "FORZA ITALIA - BERLUSCONI - UGOLINI PRESIDENTE - NOI MODERATI": "FORZA ITALIA - BERLUSCONI - UGOLINI PRESIDENTE - NOI MODERATI", "FRATELLI D ITALIA - GIORGIA MELONI": "FRATELLI D ITALIA - GIORGIA MELONI", "LEALTA COERENZA VERITA - LUCA TEODORI": "LEALTA COERENZA VERITA - LUCA TEODORI", "LEGA SALVINI EMILIA-ROMAGNA - IL POPOLO DELLA FAMIGLIA": "LEGA SALVINI EMILIA-ROMAGNA - IL POPOLO DELLA FAMIGLIA", "MOVIMENTO 5 STELLE": "MOVIMENTO 5 STELLE", "PARTITO DEMOCRATICO - DE PASCALE PRESIDENTE": "PARTITO DEMOCRATICO - DE PASCALE PRESIDENTE", "RETE CIVICA - ELENA UGOLINI PRESIDENTE": "RETE CIVICA - ELENA UGOLINI PRESIDENTE", "RIFORMISTI EMILIA-ROMAGNA FUTURA - DE PASCALE PRESIDENTE": "RIFORMISTI EMILIA-ROMAGNA FUTURA - DE PASCALE PRESIDENTE"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4529, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 4529, "cast_gt_registered": 4529}, "n_stations_flagged": 4529, "created_at": "2026-06-27T14:06:31.350643", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.908, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.784, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.687, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.687, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.693, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.693, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.182, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.182, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4529}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "aac8a66c7bdb43fcbd3e795802aadffc", "name": "Germany 2023 local (overnight germany_bavaria_2023_landtag.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.statistik.bayern.de/mam/wahlen/landtagswahlen/ergebnisse/ltw_2023_stimmbezirksergebnisse.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"stimmkreis_nr": "stimmkreis_nr", "regionalschluessel": "regionalschluessel", "Z_CSU": "Z_CSU", "Z_GRUENE": "Z_GRUENE", "Z_FREIE_WAEHLER": "Z_FREIE_WAEHLER", "Z_AfD": "Z_AfD", "Z_SPD": "Z_SPD", "Z_FDP": "Z_FDP", "Z_DIE_LINKE": "Z_DIE_LINKE", "Z_BP": "Z_BP", "Z_OEDP": "Z_OEDP", "Z_Die_PARTEI": "Z_Die_PARTEI", "Z_Tierschutzpartei": "Z_Tierschutzpartei", "Z_V-Partei": "Z_V-Partei", "Z_PdH": "Z_PdH", "Z_dieBasis": "Z_dieBasis", "Z_Volt": "Z_Volt", "erst_valid": "erst_valid", "erst_invalid": "erst_invalid", "E_CSU": "E_CSU", "E_GRUENE": "E_GRUENE", "E_FREIE_WAEHLER": "E_FREIE_WAEHLER", "E_AfD": "E_AfD", "E_SPD": "E_SPD", "E_FDP": "E_FDP", "E_DIE_LINKE": "E_DIE_LINKE", "E_BP": "E_BP", "E_OEDP": "E_OEDP", "E_Die_PARTEI": "E_Die_PARTEI", "E_Tierschutzpartei": "E_Tierschutzpartei", "E_V-Partei": "E_V-Partei", "E_PdH": "E_PdH", "E_dieBasis": "E_dieBasis", "E_Volt": "E_Volt"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18806, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 18806, "cast_valid_mismatch": 344, "registered_not_positive": 8393, "cast_gt_registered": 8393}, "n_stations_flagged": 18806, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:24:09.310346", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.855, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.812, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.015, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.015, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18806}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8ea6d0f4f5f249c6b80e203d88228ee7", "name": "Taiwan 2024 parliamentary_partylist (overnight taiwan_2024_legislative_partylist.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Taiwan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.cec.gov.tw/ (\u9078\u8209\u8cc7\u6599\u5eab/votedata.zip, updated 2025-01-24) -> votedata/voteData/2024\u7e3d\u7d71\u7acb\u59d4/\u4e0d\u5206\u5340\u653f\u9ee8/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u5c0f\u6c11\u53c3\u653f\u6b50\u5df4\u6851\u806f\u76df": "\u5c0f\u6c11\u53c3\u653f\u6b50\u5df4\u6851\u806f\u76df", "\u53f0\u7063\u7da0\u9ee8": "\u53f0\u7063\u7da0\u9ee8", "\u81fa\u7063\u96d9\u8a9e\u7121\u6cd5\u9ee8": "\u81fa\u7063\u96d9\u8a9e\u7121\u6cd5\u9ee8", "\u53f0\u7063\u57fa\u9032": "\u53f0\u7063\u57fa\u9032", "\u4e2d\u83ef\u7d71\u4e00\u4fc3\u9032\u9ee8": "\u4e2d\u83ef\u7d71\u4e00\u4fc3\u9032\u9ee8", "\u6c11\u4e3b\u9032\u6b65\u9ee8": "\u6c11\u4e3b\u9032\u6b65\u9ee8", "\u5236\u5ea6\u6551\u4e16\u5cf6": "\u5236\u5ea6\u6551\u4e16\u5cf6", "\u6642\u4ee3\u529b\u91cf": "\u6642\u4ee3\u529b\u91cf", "\u4e2d\u570b\u570b\u6c11\u9ee8": "\u4e2d\u570b\u570b\u6c11\u9ee8", "\u53f8\u6cd5\u6539\u9769\u9ee8": "\u53f8\u6cd5\u6539\u9769\u9ee8", "\u65b0\u9ee8": "\u65b0\u9ee8", "\u53f0\u7063\u6c11\u773e\u9ee8": "\u53f0\u7063\u6c11\u773e\u9ee8", "\u53f0\u7063\u7dad\u65b0": "\u53f0\u7063\u7dad\u65b0", "\u89aa\u6c11\u9ee8": "\u89aa\u6c11\u9ee8", "\u4eba\u6c11\u6700\u5927\u9ee8": "\u4eba\u6c11\u6700\u5927\u9ee8", "\u53f0\u7063\u5718\u7d50\u806f\u76df": "\u53f0\u7063\u5718\u7d50\u806f\u76df"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17795, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:23:03.709303", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.877, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.941, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.804, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.707, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.294, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.462, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.707, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.707, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.22, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.22, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17795}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "78d5c13e218445b5bd635d8ac80d4e6f", "name": "Taiwan 2024 parliamentary_district (overnight taiwan_2024_legislative_district.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Taiwan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.cec.gov.tw/ (\u9078\u8209\u8cc7\u6599\u5eab/votedata.zip, updated 2025-01-24) -> votedata/voteData/2024\u7e3d\u7d71\u7acb\u59d4/\u5340\u57df\u7acb\u59d4/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"party_\u4e2d\u570b\u570b\u6c11\u9ee8": "party_\u4e2d\u570b\u570b\u6c11\u9ee8", "party_\u4e2d\u83ef\u5a66\u5973\u9ee8": "party_\u4e2d\u83ef\u5a66\u5973\u9ee8", "party_\u4e2d\u83ef\u611b\u570b\u540c\u5fc3\u9ee8": "party_\u4e2d\u83ef\u611b\u570b\u540c\u5fc3\u9ee8", "party_\u4e2d\u83ef\u6587\u5316\u5171\u548c\u9ee8": "party_\u4e2d\u83ef\u6587\u5316\u5171\u548c\u9ee8", "party_\u4e2d\u83ef\u7d71\u4e00\u4fc3\u9032\u9ee8": "party_\u4e2d\u83ef\u7d71\u4e00\u4fc3\u9032\u9ee8", "party_\u4e2d\u83ef\u806f\u5408\u9ee8": "party_\u4e2d\u83ef\u806f\u5408\u9ee8", "party_\u4eba\u6c11\u6700\u5927\u9ee8": "party_\u4eba\u6c11\u6700\u5927\u9ee8", "party_\u4eba\u6c11\u6c11\u4e3b\u9ee8": "party_\u4eba\u6c11\u6c11\u4e3b\u9ee8", "party_\u5236\u5ea6\u6551\u4e16\u5cf6": "party_\u5236\u5ea6\u6551\u4e16\u5cf6", "party_\u52de\u52d5\u9ee8": "party_\u52de\u52d5\u9ee8", "party_\u53f0\u7063\u570b\u6c11\u9ee8": "party_\u53f0\u7063\u570b\u6c11\u9ee8", "party_\u53f0\u7063\u57fa\u9032": "party_\u53f0\u7063\u57fa\u9032", "party_\u53f0\u7063\u6574\u5fa9\u5e2b\u806f\u76df\u5de5\u9ee8": "party_\u53f0\u7063\u6574\u5fa9\u5e2b\u806f\u76df\u5de5\u9ee8", "party_\u53f0\u7063\u6c11\u773e\u9ee8": "party_\u53f0\u7063\u6c11\u773e\u9ee8", "party_\u53f0\u7063\u7da0\u9ee8": "party_\u53f0\u7063\u7da0\u9ee8", "party_\u53f0\u7063\u7dad\u65b0": "party_\u53f0\u7063\u7dad\u65b0", "party_\u53f0\u7063\u9769\u547d\u9ee8": "party_\u53f0\u7063\u9769\u547d\u9ee8", "party_\u53f0\u7063\u9ebb\u5c07\u6700\u5927\u9ee8": "party_\u53f0\u7063\u9ebb\u5c07\u6700\u5927\u9ee8", "party_\u53f8\u6cd5\u6539\u9769\u9ee8": "party_\u53f8\u6cd5\u6539\u9769\u9ee8", "party_\u53f8\u6cd5\u6b63\u7fa9\u9ee8": "party_\u53f8\u6cd5\u6b63\u7fa9\u9ee8", "party_\u5408\u4e00\u884c\u52d5\u806f\u76df": "party_\u5408\u4e00\u884c\u52d5\u806f\u76df", "party_\u559c\u6a02\u5cf6\u806f\u76df": "party_\u559c\u6a02\u5cf6\u806f\u76df", "party_\u5bb6\u5ead\u57fa\u672c\u6536\u5165": "party_\u5bb6\u5ead\u57fa\u672c\u6536\u5165", "party_\u5c0f\u6c11\u53c3\u653f\u6b50\u5df4\u6851\u806f\u76df": "party_\u5c0f\u6c11\u53c3\u653f\u6b50\u5df4\u6851\u806f\u76df", "party_\u5fa9\u5eb7\u806f\u76df\u9ee8": "party_\u5fa9\u5eb7\u806f\u76df\u9ee8", "party_\u65b0\u9ee8": "party_\u65b0\u9ee8", "party_\u6642\u4ee3\u529b\u91cf": "party_\u6642\u4ee3\u529b\u91cf", "party_\u6c11\u4e3b\u9032\u6b65\u9ee8": "party_\u6c11\u4e3b\u9032\u6b65\u9ee8", "party_\u7121\u9ee8\u7c4d\u53ca\u672a\u7d93\u653f\u9ee8\u63a8\u85a6": "party_\u7121\u9ee8\u7c4d\u53ca\u672a\u7d93\u653f\u9ee8\u63a8\u85a6", "party_\u793e\u6703\u6c11\u4e3b\u9ee8": "party_\u793e\u6703\u6c11\u4e3b\u9ee8", "party_\u7d93\u6fdf\u9ee8": "party_\u7d93\u6fdf\u9ee8", "party_\u81fa\u7063\u96d9\u8a9e\u7121\u6cd5\u9ee8": "party_\u81fa\u7063\u96d9\u8a9e\u7121\u6cd5\u9ee8", "party_\u8208\u4e2d\u540c\u76df\u6703": "party_\u8208\u4e2d\u540c\u76df\u6703"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17795, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:22:06.765063", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.877, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.941, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.804, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.707, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.294, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.462, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.707, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.707, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.22, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.22, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17795}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "713aaabe8a6e4d779d213068870e2930", "name": "Germany 2021 local (overnight germany_baden_wuerttemberg_2021_landtag.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.statistik-bw.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Grafiken/200_Staat_Gesellschaft/240_Wahlen/242_Landtagswahl/LTW21_Bezirke.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"GR\u00dcNE": "GR\u00dcNE", "CDU": "CDU", "AfD": "AfD", "SPD": "SPD", "FDP": "FDP", "DIE LINKE": "DIE LINKE", "\u00d6DP": "\u00d6DP", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "Die PARTEI": "Die PARTEI", "FREIE W\u00c4HLER": "FREIE W\u00c4HLER", "MENSCHLICHE WELT": "MENSCHLICHE WELT", "B\u00fcndnis C": "B\u00fcndnis C", "DKP": "DKP", "dieBasis": "dieBasis", "DiB": "DiB", "Eine f\u00fcr Alle - Partei": "Eine f\u00fcr Alle - Partei", "KlimalisteBW": "KlimalisteBW", "Die Humanisten": "Die Humanisten", "Gesundheitsforschung": "Gesundheitsforschung", "W2020": "W2020", "Volt": "Volt", "Einzelbewerber": "Einzelbewerber"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7450, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:21:42.485322", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.863, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.814, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.016, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7450}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ccd7b9cc87594335a04504afdf273265", "name": "Spain 2024 local (overnight spain_catalonia_2024_parlament_per_mesa.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.gencat.cat/eleccions/resultatsparlament2024/descarregues/epc_2024.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PSC": "PSC", "CAT-JUNTS+": "CAT-JUNTS+", "ERC": "ERC", "PP": "PP", "VOX": "VOX", "COMUNS SUMAR": "COMUNS SUMAR", "CUP - DT": "CUP - DT", "ALIAN\u00c7A.CAT": "ALIAN\u00c7A.CAT", "PACMA": "PACMA", "Cs": "Cs", "ALHORA": "ALHORA", "FO": "FO", "PCTC": "PCTC", "RECORTES CERO": "RECORTES CERO", "PUM+J": "PUM+J", "IZQP - UNIDOS - DEf": "IZQP - UNIDOS - DEf", "F.N.C": "F.N.C", "CNV": "CNV"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8944, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:21:14.707591", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.831, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.269, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.826, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.743, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.269, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.743, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.098, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.098, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8944}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "43eb8fcd35664b019d427c01b0cfc317", "name": "Canada 2022 local (overnight canada_ontario_2022_provincial_pollbypoll.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.elections.on.ca/api/report-groups/45/report-outputs/1049/csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"rejected_ballots": "rejected_ballots", "unmarked_ballots": "unmarked_ballots", "declined_ballots": "declined_ballots", "BEN": "BEN", "CCP": "CCP", "CEN": "CEN", "CNS": "CNS", "COM": "COM", "COR": "COR", "ERO": "ERO", "FPJ": "FPJ", "FRE": "FRE", "GPO": "GPO", "IND": "IND", "IND_ABATI": "IND_ABATI", "IND_AHLUWALIA": "IND_AHLUWALIA", "IND_ALEXANDER": "IND_ALEXANDER", "IND_ALI": "IND_ALI", "IND_BABIC": "IND_BABIC", "IND_BEATTY": "IND_BEATTY", "IND_BORCSOK": "IND_BORCSOK", "IND_BRADY": "IND_BRADY", "IND_CHESNIK": "IND_CHESNIK", "IND_FOGEL": "IND_FOGEL", "IND_GINSBERG": "IND_GINSBERG", "IND_HADLEY": "IND_HADLEY", "IND_MCMORROW": "IND_MCMORROW", "IND_RACHLIS": "IND_RACHLIS", "IND_STEFANIS": "IND_STEFANIS", "IND_SUTHERLAND": "IND_SUTHERLAND", "IND_YING": "IND_YING", "LIB": "LIB", "LTN": "LTN", "MOD": "MOD", "NA": "NA", "NAP": "NAP", "NBO": "NBO", "NDP": "NDP", "NRT": "NRT", "OAL": "OAL", "ONP": "ONP", "PCP": "PCP", "PEO": "PEO", "PPF": "PPF", "PPR": "PPR", "PSN": "PSN", "SNS": "SNS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8072, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 2195, "registered_not_positive": 1056, "cast_gt_registered": 806, "votes_gt_valid": 5813}, "n_stations_flagged": 6208, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:20:50.775554", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.846, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.904, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.848, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.745, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.644, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.644, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.887, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8072}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cf07a83bdbe54a908c0a90ecbf1f88dd", "name": "Spain 2021 local (overnight spain_madrid_2021_asamblea_per_mesa.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://datos.comunidad.madrid/dataset/08aac4de-ca28-4f9c-b45d-ef8457c4b5d2", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votos_blanco": "votos_blanco", "Cs": "Cs", "PUM_plus_J": "PUM_plus_J", "PCTE": "PCTE", "FE_de_las_JONS": "FE_de_las_JONS", "PH": "PH", "PACMA": "PACMA", "3e_en_accion": "3e_en_accion", "PARTIDO_AUTONOMOS": "PARTIDO_AUTONOMOS", "PSOE": "PSOE", "PP": "PP", "PCOE-PCPE": "PCOE-PCPE", "VOLT": "VOLT", "VOX": "VOX", "P-LIB": "P-LIB", "POLE": "POLE", "MAS_MADRID": "MAS_MADRID", "EB": "EB", "UDEC": "UDEC", "PODEMOS-IU": "PODEMOS-IU", "RECORTES_CERO-PCAS-TC-GV-M": "RECORTES_CERO-PCAS-TC-GV-M"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7266, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:20:29.353026", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.945, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.908, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.85, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.775, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.036, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.036, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7266}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ed3d65de56e141cf874ae5a13a77c4a5", "name": "Germany 2023 local (overnight germany_hesse_2023_landtag_zweitstimme.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://wahlen.hessen-ltw23.23degrees.eu/assets/Wahlergebnisse_Landtagswahl.csv (Hessischer Landeswahlleiter official results dashboard data export); landing https://wahlen.hessen.de/landtagswahlen/ergebnisse-2023", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CDU": "CDU", "GR\u00dcNE": "GR\u00dcNE", "SPD": "SPD", "AfD": "AfD", "FDP": "FDP", "DIE LINKE": "DIE LINKE", "FREIE W\u00c4HLER": "FREIE W\u00c4HLER", "Tierschutzpartei": "Tierschutzpartei", "Die PARTEI": "Die PARTEI", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "\u00d6DP": "\u00d6DP", "Verj\u00fcngungsforschung": "Verj\u00fcngungsforschung", "V-Partei3": "V-Partei3", "PdH": "PdH", "ABG": "ABG", "APPD": "APPD", "dieBasis": "dieBasis", "DKP": "DKP", "DIE NEUE MITTE": "DIE NEUE MITTE", "Volt": "Volt", "KLIMALISTE W\u00c4HLERL": "KLIMALISTE W\u00c4HLERL", "B\u00fcndnis C": "B\u00fcndnis C", "WDMR": "WDMR", "BUNDESPA KLIMALISTE": "BUNDESPA KLIMALISTE", "MERA25": "MERA25", "NEV": "NEV", "PP": "PP", "SGV": "SGV", "Solibew": "Solibew"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6954, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1946, "cast_gt_registered": 1881}, "n_stations_flagged": 1946, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:20:08.466994", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.855, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.812, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.015, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.015, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6954}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8f264287b0274884ae2494c605c62796", "name": "United States 2024 local (overnight us_north_carolina_2024.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/dl.ncsbe.gov/ENRS/2024_11_05/results_pct_20241105.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CST": "CST", "DEM": "DEM", "GRE": "GRE", "LIB": "LIB", "REP": "REP", "WI": "WI", "WTP": "WTP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6558, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 6384, "registered_not_positive": 6558}, "n_stations_flagged": 6558, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:19:48.170924", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6558}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0f22414435d341a494ae8ab8d154cc4e", "name": "Spain 2023 local (overnight spain_valencia_2023_corts_mesa.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://dadesobertes.gva.es/ dataset pre-result-elec-autonom-2023 (Resultados de elecciones a Les Corts 2023); CSV resource 60f818a5-9ae2-483a-ad31-f61b8d016513", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ALIANZA_C_V": "ALIANZA_C_V", "CENTRATS": "CENTRATS", "CENTRO_MODERADO": "CENTRO_MODERADO", "COMPROM\u00cdS": "COMPROM\u00cdS", "CS": "CS", "Cs": "Cs", "DECIDIX": "DECIDIX", "ERPV": "ERPV", "ESCA\u00d1OS_EN_BLANCO": "ESCA\u00d1OS_EN_BLANCO", "PACMA": "PACMA", "PAR-ES_C": "PAR-ES_C", "PP": "PP", "PSOE": "PSOE", "PUM+J": "PUM+J", "P_C_P_E": "P_C_P_E", "RECORTES_CERO": "RECORTES_CERO", "RVPVE": "RVPVE", "UNITS": "UNITS", "UP-EUPV": "UP-EUPV", "VOX": "VOX"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6172, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 8, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 9, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:19:30.354582", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.831, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.269, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.759, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.269, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.067, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.067, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6172}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "66af341c43ab4cc4a1684d1e09cfc426", "name": "United States 2022 local (overnight us_georgia_2022_state_legislature_precinct.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/openelections/openelections-data-ga/blob/master/2022/20221108__ga__general__precinct.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"rep_votes": "rep_votes", "dem_votes": "dem_votes"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5749, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 5749, "cast_gt_registered": 5698}, "n_stations_flagged": 5749, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:19:13.284218", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 5749}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c0b9337f4928461ca48d574aa349ed37", "name": "United States 2023 local (overnight us_virginia_2023_general_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democratic": "votes_democratic", "votes_republican": "votes_republican", "votes_independent": "votes_independent", "votes_libertarian": "votes_libertarian", "votes_other": "votes_other", "votes_writein": "votes_writein"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5522, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 5522, "cast_gt_registered": 5507}, "n_stations_flagged": 5522, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:18:57.179630", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.857, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.789, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.44, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.61, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 5522}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b42f354cc57246b096c5c177f90dcf5a", "name": "Germany 2021 local (overnight germany_rlp_2021_landtag.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.wahlen.rlp.de/fileadmin/wahlen.rlp.de/dokumente-wahlen/ltw/Ergebnisdateien/2021/LW2021_Endgueltiges_Ergebnis.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"SPD": "SPD", "CDU": "CDU", "AfD": "AfD", "FDP": "FDP", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "DIE_LINKE": "DIE_LINKE", "FREIE_WAEHLER": "FREIE_WAEHLER", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "OEDP": "OEDP", "Klimaliste": "Klimaliste", "Die_PARTEI": "Die_PARTEI", "Tierschutzpartei": "Tierschutzpartei", "VOLT": "VOLT", "Basisdemokratie": "Basisdemokratie", "Dr_Moritz": "Dr_Moritz", "SIGGI_waehlen": "SIGGI_waehlen"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4128, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:18:44.925636", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.863, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.814, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.016, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4128}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f9f38e2a10b14545bc5cff6923ca91a6", "name": "Germany 2024 local (overnight germany_saxony_2024_landtag_wahlbezirk.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://wahlen.sachsen.de/download/Landtag/statistik-sachsen_LW24_endgErgebnisse_WBZ.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CDU_zweit": "CDU_zweit", "AfD_zweit": "AfD_zweit", "DIE_LINKE_zweit": "DIE_LINKE_zweit", "GRUENE_zweit": "GRUENE_zweit", "SPD_zweit": "SPD_zweit", "FDP_zweit": "FDP_zweit", "FREIE_WAEHLER_zweit": "FREIE_WAEHLER_zweit", "Die_PARTEI_zweit": "Die_PARTEI_zweit", "PIRATEN_zweit": "PIRATEN_zweit", "DP_zweit": "DP_zweit", "B_So_zweit": "B_So_zweit", "TIERSCHUTZ_hier_zweit": "TIERSCHUTZ_hier_zweit", "dieBasis_zweit": "dieBasis_zweit", "B_ndnis_C_zweit": "B_ndnis_C_zweit", "B_NDNIS_DEUTSCHLAND_zweit": "B_NDNIS_DEUTSCHLAND_zweit", "BSW_zweit": "BSW_zweit", "FREIE_SACHSEN_zweit": "FREIE_SACHSEN_zweit", "V_Partei3_zweit": "V_Partei3_zweit", "WU_zweit": "WU_zweit"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3440, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:18:34.851291", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.825, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.778, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.567, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3440}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e0d312bf543a40c8b9a216939584aed4", "name": "Spain 2022 local (overnight spain_castilla_leon_2022_cortes_per_mesa.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://analisis.datosabiertos.jcyl.es/explore/dataset/resultados-electorales-1983-actualidad/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"codigo_municipio": "codigo_municipio", "votos_blanco": "votos_blanco", "CBierzo - BEX": "CBierzo - BEX", "Cs": "Cs", "DESPIERTA": "DESPIERTA", "EB": "EB", "ESPA\u00d1A VACIADA": "ESPA\u00d1A VACIADA", "FE de las JONS": "FE de las JONS", "PACMA": "PACMA", "PCAS-TC-RC": "PCAS-TC-RC", "PCTE": "PCTE", "PODEMOS-IU-AV": "PODEMOS-IU-AV", "POR ZAMORA": "POR ZAMORA", "PP": "PP", "PPCCAL": "PPCCAL", "PREPAL": "PREPAL", "PSOE": "PSOE", "PUEDE": "PUEDE", "PUM+J": "PUM+J", "PYC (ANULADA)": "PYC (ANULADA)", "SY": "SY", "TAB": "TAB", "UNI\u00d3N REGIONALISTA": "UNI\u00d3N REGIONALISTA", "UPL": "UPL", "VOLT": "VOLT", "VOX": "VOX", "XAV": "XAV", "ZAMORA DECIDE": "ZAMORA DECIDE", "centrados": "centrados"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4531, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 4531}, "n_stations_flagged": 4531, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:18:21.034545", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.945, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.908, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.867, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.782, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.725, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.725, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.901, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4531}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4e1c609595e0495d9543fbeea0b1bde6", "name": "Spain 2024 local (overnight spain_galicia_2024_parlamento_mesa.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://abertos.xunta.gal/catalogo/administracion-publica/-/dataset/0656/eleccions-parlamento-galicia-resultados-2024", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cod_circunscripcion": "cod_circunscripcion", "votos_brancos": "votos_brancos", "BNG": "BNG", "DO": "DO", "ECG": "ECG", "ESCANOS EN BRANCO": "ESCANOS EN BRANCO", "PACMA": "PACMA", "PODEMOS-ALIANZA VERDE": "PODEMOS-ALIANZA VERDE", "PP": "PP", "PSdeG-PSOE": "PSdeG-PSOE", "PUM+J": "PUM+J", "SUMAR GALICIA": "SUMAR GALICIA", "VOX": "VOX"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3992, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 3992, "registered_not_positive": 37}, "n_stations_flagged": 3992, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:18:08.851089", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.831, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.269, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.826, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.743, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.269, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.743, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.098, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.098, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3992}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "897e7949fca241d59f39d1bbe91e7fcb", "name": "Germany 2023 local (overnight germany_berlin_2023_agh_wahlbezirk.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://wahlen-berlin.de/wahlen/Be2023/AFSPRAES/agh/DL/DL_BE_AGHBVV2023.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"wahlkreis": "wahlkreis", "SPD": "SPD", "CDU": "CDU", "GR\u00dcNE": "GR\u00dcNE", "DIE LINKE": "DIE LINKE", "AfD": "AfD", "FDP": "FDP", "Die PARTEI": "Die PARTEI", "Tierschutzpartei": "Tierschutzpartei", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "Graue Panther": "Graue Panther", "NPD": "NPD", "Gesundheitsforschung": "Gesundheitsforschung", "LKR": "LKR", "DKP": "DKP", "SGP": "SGP", "B\u00fcSo": "B\u00fcSo", "MENSCHLICHE WELT": "MENSCHLICHE WELT", "Bstar": "Bstar", "\u00d6DP": "\u00d6DP", "dieBasis": "dieBasis", "Bildet Berlin!": "Bildet Berlin!", "DL": "DL", "Deutsche Konservative": "Deutsche Konservative", "Die Grauen": "Die Grauen", "Neue Demokraten": "Neue Demokraten", "REP": "REP", "du_": "du_", "B\u00dcNDNIS21": "B\u00dcNDNIS21", "DIE FRAUEN": "DIE FRAUEN", "FREIE W\u00c4HLER": "FREIE W\u00c4HLER", "Klimaliste Berlin": "Klimaliste Berlin", "LD": "LD", "MIETERPARTEI": "MIETERPARTEI", "Die Humanisten": "Die Humanisten", "Team Todenh\u00f6fer": "Team Todenh\u00f6fer", "Volt": "Volt"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3764, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 3764, "cast_valid_mismatch": 873, "registered_not_positive": 1507, "cast_gt_registered": 1507}, "n_stations_flagged": 3764, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:17:57.558927", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.855, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.812, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.015, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.015, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3764}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "98f5e207c0464a2bba4fe958eccf37a4", "name": "Norway 2025 Storting (per stemmekrets)", "metadata": {"country": "Norway", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://valgresultat.no/api/2025/st", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_arbeiderpartiet": "votes_arbeiderpartiet", "votes_fremskrittspartiet": "votes_fremskrittspartiet", "votes_h_yre": "votes_h_yre", "votes_sv_sosialistisk_venstreparti": "votes_sv_sosialistisk_venstreparti", "votes_senterpartiet": "votes_senterpartiet", "votes_r_dt": "votes_r_dt", "votes_milj_partiet_de_gr_nne": "votes_milj_partiet_de_gr_nne", "votes_andre": "votes_andre", "votes_kristelig_folkeparti": "votes_kristelig_folkeparti", "votes_venstre": "votes_venstre", "votes_pensjonistpartiet": "votes_pensjonistpartiet", "votes_blanke": "votes_blanke", "votes_norgesdemokratene": "votes_norgesdemokratene", "votes_generasjonspartiet": "votes_generasjonspartiet", "votes_industri_og_n_ringspartiet": "votes_industri_og_n_ringspartiet", "votes_konservativt": "votes_konservativt", "votes_fred_og_rettferdighet_for": "votes_fred_og_rettferdighet_for", "votes_partiet_sentrum": "votes_partiet_sentrum", "votes_partiet_dni": "votes_partiet_dni", "votes_velferd_og_innovasjonspartiet": "votes_velferd_og_innovasjonspartiet", "votes_pasientfokus": "votes_pasientfokus", "votes_redd_ullev_l_sykehus": "votes_redd_ullev_l_sykehus", "votes_ensomhetspartiet": "votes_ensomhetspartiet", "votes_norges_kommunistiske_parti": "votes_norges_kommunistiske_parti", "votes_andre2": "votes_andre2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3602, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1453, "registered_not_positive": 1677}, "n_stations_flagged": 1712, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:17:46.228601", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.798, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.891, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.89, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.847, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.798, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.923, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.454, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.01, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.01, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3602}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "42413ffec4b644f980e671dd580d7ad2", "name": "Australia 2023 local (overnight australia_nsw_2023_legislative_assembly_per_venue.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://pastvtr.elections.nsw.gov.au/SG2301/LA/state/SGE%202023%20LA%20Final%20Votes.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"GRN": "GRN", "AJP": "AJP", "ALP": "ALP", "SAP": "SAP", "LIB": "LIB", "SFF": "SFF", "LDP": "LDP", "ON": "ON", "IND_LOUGHREY": "IND_LOUGHREY", "NAT": "NAT", "PEP": "PEP", "IMOP": "IMOP", "IND_BUTLER": "IND_BUTLER", "IND_HOWE": "IND_HOWE", "LCP": "LCP", "IND_TICEHURST": "IND_TICEHURST", "IND_HAWKINS": "IND_HAWKINS", "IND_HOANG": "IND_HOANG", "IND_GALIELL": "IND_GALIELL", "IND_ORGAN": "IND_ORGAN", "IND_NOVAK": "IND_NOVAK", "IND_LEVI": "IND_LEVI", "IND_TOWNLEY": "IND_TOWNLEY", "IND_YOUNG": "IND_YOUNG", "IND_FISHER": "IND_FISHER", "IND_KITSON": "IND_KITSON", "IND_BROGAN": "IND_BROGAN", "IND_WATERSON": "IND_WATERSON", "IND_LOVERO": "IND_LOVERO", "IND_ODESH": "IND_ODESH", "IND_BELLAMY": "IND_BELLAMY", "IND_SAAD": "IND_SAAD", "IND_MAGUIRE": "IND_MAGUIRE", "SBP": "SBP", "IND_PETTITT": "IND_PETTITT", "SA": "SA", "IND_KILHAM": "IND_KILHAM", "IND_SWINBOURN": "IND_SWINBOURN", "IND_CASWELL": "IND_CASWELL", "IND_DIGNAM": "IND_DIGNAM", "IND_WARD": "IND_WARD", "IND_STOLZ": "IND_STOLZ", "IND_PIPER": "IND_PIPER", "IND_DAVIDSON": "IND_DAVIDSON", "IND_McKENZIE": "IND_McKENZIE", "IND_CROSTHWAITE": "IND_CROSTHWAITE", "IND_ANDJELKOVIC": "IND_ANDJELKOVIC", "IND_LEE": "IND_LEE", "IND_ALTMAN": "IND_ALTMAN", "IND_HACKMAN": "IND_HACKMAN", "IND_CAMERON": "IND_CAMERON", "IND_THALER": "IND_THALER", "IND_DALTON": "IND_DALTON", "IND_ADAMSON": "IND_ADAMSON", "IND_LANDINI": "IND_LANDINI", "IND_BENDALL": "IND_BENDALL", "IND_CONWAY": "IND_CONWAY", "IND_WALKER": "IND_WALKER", "IND_WOOD": "IND_WOOD", "IND_LEDGER": "IND_LEDGER", "IND_MORT": "IND_MORT", "IND_DONATO": "IND_DONATO", "IND_FAIRHALL": "IND_FAIRHALL", "IND_IRWIN": "IND_IRWIN", "IND_SCRUBY": "IND_SCRUBY", "IND_PONNAMBALAM": "IND_PONNAMBALAM", "IND_HOMER": "IND_HOMER", "IND_DIGIGLIO": "IND_DIGIGLIO", "IND_GREENWICH": "IND_GREENWICH", "IND_RODDA": "IND_RODDA", "IND_McNAMARA": "IND_McNAMARA", "IND_FREYER": "IND_FREYER", "IND_McGIRR": "IND_McGIRR", "IND_HAYWOOD": "IND_HAYWOOD", "IND_REGAN": "IND_REGAN", "IND_STARRETT": "IND_STARRETT", "IND_PENN": "IND_PENN", "IND_HANNAN": "IND_HANNAN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3396, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 3392, "registered_not_positive": 3396}, "n_stations_flagged": 3396, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:17:35.288047", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.841, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.851, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.802, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.067, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.921, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.029, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.029, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3396}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "055a0de3164140d2ae6e110c00a3095e", "name": "Germany 2022 local (overnight germany_schleswig_holstein_2022_landtag.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.wahlen-sh.de/ltw_2022/ergebnis-download.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CDU": "CDU", "SPD": "SPD", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "FDP": "FDP", "AfD": "AfD", "DIE_LINKE": "DIE_LINKE", "SSW": "SSW", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "FREIE_WAEHLER": "FREIE_WAEHLER", "Die_PARTEI": "Die_PARTEI", "Z": "Z", "dieBasis": "dieBasis", "Die_Humanisten": "Die_Humanisten", "Gesundheitsforschung": "Gesundheitsforschung", "Tierschutzpartei": "Tierschutzpartei", "Volt": "Volt"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2909, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 480, "cast_gt_registered": 482}, "n_stations_flagged": 482, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:17:26.550633", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.855, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.806, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.018, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2909}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "421af5c8448d4c909acca6bfc729a93d", "name": "Spain 2024 local (overnight spain_basque_2024_parlamento_mesa.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.euskadi.eus/contenidos/informacion/w_em_descargas/es_def/adjuntos/csv/Cas-csv.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"EAJ-PNV": "EAJ-PNV", "EH BILDU": "EH BILDU", "PSE-EE/PSOE": "PSE-EE/PSOE", "PP": "PP", "SUMAR": "SUMAR", "PODEMOS-AHAL DUGU - ALIANZA VERDE": "PODEMOS-AHAL DUGU - ALIANZA VERDE", "VOX": "VOX", "PACMA": "PACMA", "EB-AZ": "EB-AZ", "PUM+J": "PUM+J", "IZAN": "IZAN", "PCTE / ELAK": "PCTE / ELAK", "PH": "PH", "O.E.": "O.E."}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2698, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:17:18.198033", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.831, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.269, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.826, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.743, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.269, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.743, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.098, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.098, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2698}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "71a57f73e1d3405a9954e030c46cd056", "name": "Germany 2021 local (overnight germany_saxony_anhalt_2021_landtag.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://wahlergebnisse.sachsen-anhalt.de/wahlen/lt21/and/lt.download.php", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"party_CDU": "party_CDU", "party_AfD": "party_AfD", "party_DIE_LINKE": "party_DIE_LINKE", "party_SPD": "party_SPD", "party_GRUENE": "party_GRUENE", "party_FDP": "party_FDP", "party_FREIE_WAEHLER": "party_FREIE_WAEHLER", "party_NPD": "party_NPD", "party_Tier_schutz_partei": "party_Tier_schutz_partei", "party_Tier_schutz_allianz": "party_Tier_schutz_allianz", "party_LKR": "party_LKR", "party_Die_PARTEI": "party_Die_PARTEI", "party_Garten_partei": "party_Garten_partei", "party_FBM": "party_FBM", "party_TIERSCHUTZ_hier": "party_TIERSCHUTZ_hier", "party_dieBasis": "party_dieBasis", "party_Klimaliste_ST": "party_Klimaliste_ST", "party_OEDP": "party_OEDP", "party_Die_Humanisten": "party_Die_Humanisten", "party_Gesundheits_forschung": "party_Gesundheits_forschung", "party_PIRATEN": "party_PIRATEN", "party_WiR2020": "party_WiR2020"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2628, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 429, "registered_not_positive": 429}, "n_stations_flagged": 429, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:17:10.169884", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.863, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.814, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.016, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2628}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0c2817375c2f4d858b8ae297f8f42c2c", "name": "Australia 2024 local (overnight australia_queensland_2024_sge_per_booth.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://resultsdata.elections.qld.gov.au/XMLData/publicResults_SGE2024_ICCDiv4_Final.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"IND_1": "IND_1", "Family_First": "Family_First", "LNP": "LNP", "ALP": "ALP", "One_Nation": "One_Nation", "Greens": "Greens", "KAP": "KAP", "LCQP": "LCQP", "IND_2": "IND_2", "AJP": "AJP", "Libertarians": "Libertarians", "IND_3": "IND_3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2226, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 2226, "cast_gt_registered": 2213}, "n_stations_flagged": 2226, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:17:03.416092", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.841, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.848, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.796, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.067, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.029, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.029, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2226}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "813786f3c7ac4a16957c2cd3576fd5bd", "name": "Spain 2023 local (overnight aragon_2023_cortes.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://opendata.aragon.es/datos/catalogo/dataset/elecciones-a-cortes-de-aragon-ano-2023-detalle-distrito-mesa-electoral", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ARAG\u00d3N EXISTE-COALICI\u00d3N EXISTE": "ARAG\u00d3N EXISTE-COALICI\u00d3N EXISTE", "CHUNTA ARAGONESISTA": "CHUNTA ARAGONESISTA", "CIUDADANOS-T\u00da ARAG\u00d3N": "CIUDADANOS-T\u00da ARAG\u00d3N", "ENTRE TODOS BAJO _ BAIX CINCA": "ENTRE TODOS BAJO _ BAIX CINCA", "ESCA\u00d1OS EN BLANCO PARA DEJAR ESCA\u00d1OS VAC\u00cdOS": "ESCA\u00d1OS EN BLANCO PARA DEJAR ESCA\u00d1OS VAC\u00cdOS", "FEDERACION DE LOS INDEPENDIENTES DE ARAGON": "FEDERACION DE LOS INDEPENDIENTES DE ARAGON", "IZQUIERDA UNIDA DE ARAGON": "IZQUIERDA UNIDA DE ARAGON", "PARTIDO ANIMALISTA CON EL MEDIO AMBIENTE": "PARTIDO ANIMALISTA CON EL MEDIO AMBIENTE", "PARTIDO ARAGONES": "PARTIDO ARAGONES", "PARTIDO COMUNISTA DE LOS TRABAJADORES DE ESPA\u00d1A": "PARTIDO COMUNISTA DE LOS TRABAJADORES DE ESPA\u00d1A", "PARTIDO POPULAR": "PARTIDO POPULAR", "PARTIDO SOCIALISTA OBRERO ESPA\u00d1OL": "PARTIDO SOCIALISTA OBRERO ESPA\u00d1OL", "PODEMOS ALIANZA VERDE": "PODEMOS ALIANZA VERDE", "TERUEL EXISTE-COALICI\u00d3N EXISTE": "TERUEL EXISTE-COALICI\u00d3N EXISTE", "VERDES EQUO": "VERDES EQUO", "VOX": "VOX"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2215, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:16:56.412557", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.831, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.269, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.759, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.269, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.067, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.067, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2215}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3a41580e3c64415cb8fbb8c9886c9ce6", "name": "Canada 2024 local (overnight canada_bc_2024_provincial_per_votingplace.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://catalogue.data.gov.bc.ca/dataset/provincial-voting-results (resource provincial_voting_results_by_voting_place.csv, DataBC; Elections BC Open Data Licence)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"BC_Green": "BC_Green", "BC_NDP": "BC_NDP", "Christian_Heritage": "Christian_Heritage", "Communist": "Communist", "Conservative": "Conservative", "Freedom": "Freedom", "Independent_Other": "Independent_Other", "Libertarian": "Libertarian"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2142, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2107, "registered_not_positive": 2142}, "n_stations_flagged": 2142, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:16:42.337317", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.846, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.904, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.841, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.744, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.744, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2142}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c39e4193b98b44dea8754b90d9d83fff", "name": "Canada 2024 local (overnight canada_nova_scotia_2024.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electionsnovascotia.ca/files/GeneralElection_42nd/42PGE_PollbyPoll_AllEDs_TurnOut_FINAL.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"rejected_ballots": "rejected_ballots", "declined_ballots": "declined_ballots", "votes_Green": "votes_Green", "votes_Independent": "votes_Independent", "votes_Liberal": "votes_Liberal", "votes_NSNDP": "votes_NSNDP", "votes_PC": "votes_PC"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1800, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 597, "cast_gt_registered": 5, "cast_valid_mismatch": 62, "registered_not_positive": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 602, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:16:36.517640", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.846, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.904, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.841, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.744, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.744, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1800}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b7589b85a17a49f680c548941bd41b43", "name": "Germany 2021 local (overnight germany_meck_pomm_2021.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.laiv-mv.de/Wahlen/Landtagswahlen/2021/Ergebnisse/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"SPD": "SPD", "AfD": "AfD", "CDU": "CDU", "DIE_LINKE": "DIE_LINKE", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "FDP": "FDP", "NPD": "NPD", "Tierschutzpartei": "Tierschutzpartei", "FREiER_HORIZONT": "FREiER_HORIZONT", "Die_PARTEI": "Die_PARTEI", "FREIE_WAEHLER": "FREIE_WAEHLER", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "DKP": "DKP", "Buendnis_C": "Buendnis_C", "TIERSCHUTZ_hier": "TIERSCHUTZ_hier", "dieBasis": "dieBasis", "DiB": "DiB", "FPA": "FPA", "LKR": "LKR", "OEDP": "OEDP", "Die_Humanisten": "Die_Humanisten", "Gesundheitsforschung": "Gesundheitsforschung", "Team_Todenhoefer": "Team_Todenhoefer", "UNABHAENGIGE": "UNABHAENGIGE", "Einzelbewerber": "Einzelbewerber"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2003, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 356, "cast_gt_registered": 353}, "n_stations_flagged": 356, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:16:30.564215", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.863, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.814, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.016, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2003}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5a0923b3ac944508ad056f7eacc342a2", "name": "Canada 2023 local (overnight canada_alberta_2023_legislative_per_poll.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.elections.ab.ca/uploads/2023-Provincial-General-Election-Statement-of-Vote.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"party_AP": "party_AP", "party_APA": "party_APA", "party_BPA": "party_BPA", "party_CP_A": "party_CP_A", "party_GPA": "party_GPA", "party_IND": "party_IND", "party_LIB": "party_LIB", "party_NDP": "party_NDP", "party_PAPA": "party_PAPA", "party_REF": "party_REF", "party_SM": "party_SM", "party_TIP": "party_TIP", "party_UCP": "party_UCP", "party_WIPA": "party_WIPA", "party_WLC": "party_WLC"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1216, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2, "cast_valid_mismatch": 808}, "n_stations_flagged": 810, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:16:26.159562", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.846, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.904, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.847, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.742, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.742, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.635, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.887, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1216}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "362c92a4b6e741f1b215c3e6872f68bf", "name": "Germany 2025 local (overnight germany_hamburg_2025.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2025, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"valid_votes_total": "valid_votes_total", "SPD": "SPD", "CDU": "CDU", "FDP": "FDP", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "Volt": "Volt", "DieLinke": "DieLinke", "AfD": "AfD", "DieWahl_WFG": "DieWahl_WFG", "DAVA_Hamburg": "DAVA_Hamburg", "FREIE_WAEHLER": "FREIE_WAEHLER", "DiePARTEI": "DiePARTEI", "OEDP": "OEDP", "Tierschutzpartei": "Tierschutzpartei", "BUENDNIS_DEUTSCHLAND": "BUENDNIS_DEUTSCHLAND", "BSW": "BSW", "NPD": "NPD"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1972, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 703, "cast_valid_mismatch": 176, "registered_not_positive": 703, "votes_gt_valid": 1970}, "n_stations_flagged": 1970, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:16:19.866609", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.846, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.462, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.828, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.782, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.462, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.746, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.233, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.558, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1972}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5a63e4e3795e41a6908f9c696e802dd0", "name": "Canada 2024 local (overnight canada_new_brunswick_2024_provincial_perpoll.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionsnb.ca/content/dam/enb/xls/prov-2024-10-21/2024-10-21-Results-Resultats.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PC": "PC", "Liberal": "Liberal", "Libertarian": "Libertarian", "Green": "Green", "NDP": "NDP", "PeoplesAlliance": "PeoplesAlliance", "Independent": "Independent", "CNBP": "CNBP", "NDP_withdrew": "NDP_withdrew", "SJPNB": "SJPNB"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1802, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1801, "registered_not_positive": 1802}, "n_stations_flagged": 1802, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:16:14.332249", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.846, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.904, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.841, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.744, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.744, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1802}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "61ec51b36c314b3f86e16ab9a6871b48", "name": "Canada 2025 local (overnight canada_newfoundland_2025_provincial_pollbypoll.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2025, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://services8.arcgis.com/aCyQID5qQcyrJMm2/arcgis/rest/services/2025_NL_Provincial_Election_Polls_By_District_view/FeatureServer/0", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"district_number": "district_number", "PC": "PC", "Liberal": "Liberal", "NDP": "NDP", "Independent1": "Independent1", "Independent2": "Independent2", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1665, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1662, "registered_not_positive": 1665, "votes_gt_valid": 1665}, "n_stations_flagged": 1665, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:16:09.315193", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.878, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.84, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.736, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.718, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.626, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.626, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.026, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1665}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c6f0bc3dafa24a328e0eff3573a61e70", "name": "Canada 2023 local (overnight canada_manitoba_2023_provincial_pollbypoll.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.electionsmanitoba.ca/en/Results/Elections/2023", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Communist": "Communist", "Green": "Green", "Independent": "Independent", "Keystone": "Keystone", "Liberal": "Liberal", "NDP": "NDP", "PC": "PC", "declined": "declined"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1512, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1512, "registered_not_positive": 1512, "votes_gt_valid": 716}, "n_stations_flagged": 1512, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:16:04.663384", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.846, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.904, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.847, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.742, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.742, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.635, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.887, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1512}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4dcec36ccd9a4b6c8c5194657d3df492", "name": "Canada 2024 local (overnight canada_saskatchewan_2024_provincial_pollbypoll.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cdn.elections.sk.ca/upload/2024-GE-POLL-BY-POLL-RESULTS-v1.0.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Buffalo_Party": "Buffalo_Party", "Independent": "Independent", "NDP": "NDP", "Progressive_Conservative": "Progressive_Conservative", "Saskatchewan_Green": "Saskatchewan_Green", "Saskatchewan_Party": "Saskatchewan_Party", "Saskatchewan_Progress": "Saskatchewan_Progress", "Saskatchewan_United": "Saskatchewan_United"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1387, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 482, "registered_not_positive": 547}, "n_stations_flagged": 549, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:59.924475", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.846, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.904, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.841, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.744, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.744, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1387}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "87f180db2b3a4e9a987f7592cb1a07a7", "name": "Australia 2025 local (overnight australia_wa_2025_legislative_assembly_per_booth.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2025, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://eis.waec.wa.gov.au/api/sgElections/sg2025/{ELECTORATE}/results (WAEC EIS API; SPA https://www.elections.wa.gov.au/elections/state/sgelection#/sg2025)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ABDUL_RAZAK_GRN": "ABDUL_RAZAK_GRN", "ABRAHAMS_GRN": "ABRAHAMS_GRN", "ADAMS_PHON": "ADAMS_PHON", "ADARNE_PHON": "ADARNE_PHON", "ANSTEE-BROOK_SFF": "ANSTEE-BROOK_SFF", "ANTHONY_LIB": "ANTHONY_LIB", "ARNATT_LCWA": "ARNATT_LCWA", "ARUMUGAM_LIB": "ARUMUGAM_LIB", "ASTILL_ALP": "ASTILL_ALP", "ATKINSON_ALP": "ATKINSON_ALP", "AUBREY_ALP": "AUBREY_ALP", "BAKER_ALP": "BAKER_ALP", "BALLAST_AC": "BALLAST_AC", "BARTLEY_AC": "BARTLEY_AC", "BAULCH_LIB": "BAULCH_LIB", "BEALE_ALP": "BEALE_ALP", "BEARD_LIB": "BEARD_LIB", "BEASLEY_GRN": "BEASLEY_GRN", "BEAZLEY_ALP": "BEAZLEY_ALP", "BELL_LCWA": "BELL_LCWA", "BENNETT_GRN": "BENNETT_GRN", "BIONDI_LIB": "BIONDI_LIB", "BISSCHOFF_PHON": "BISSCHOFF_PHON", "BLAYNEY_NATS": "BLAYNEY_NATS", "BLEVIN_SFF": "BLEVIN_SFF", "BOLAND_AJP": "BOLAND_AJP", "BOLT_LIB": "BOLT_LIB", "BONE_AC": "BONE_AC", "BREWER_LIB": "BREWER_LIB", "BROUGH_LIB": "BROUGH_LIB", "BRUENING_GRN": "BRUENING_GRN", "BULBECK_GRN": "BULBECK_GRN", "BULL_ALP": "BULL_ALP", "BURDETT_AC": "BURDETT_AC", "BURNETT_AC": "BURNETT_AC", "BURNS_PHON": "BURNS_PHON", "BURTON_PHON": "BURTON_PHON", "BUTI_ALP": "BUTI_ALP", "BUTLER_IND": "BUTLER_IND", "BUTLER_LIB": "BUTLER_LIB", "BYAS_NATS": "BYAS_NATS", "CAREY_ALP": "CAREY_ALP", "CAROT_COLLINS_GRN": "CAROT_COLLINS_GRN", "CARRIE-WILSON": "CARRIE-WILSON", "CATANIA_ALP": "CATANIA_ALP", "CHARLES_LCWA": "CHARLES_LCWA", "CHAVITTUPARA_LIB": "CHAVITTUPARA_LIB", "CHOWDHARY_LIB": "CHOWDHARY_LIB", "CLARKE_ALP": "CLARKE_ALP", "CLARKE_GRN": "CLARKE_GRN", "COFFEY_SFF": "COFFEY_SFF", "COLAGIURI_SFF": "COLAGIURI_SFF", "COLE_LCWA": "COLE_LCWA", "COLLINS_ALP": "COLLINS_ALP", "CONNORS_AC": "CONNORS_AC", "COOK_ALP": "COOK_ALP", "CORNISH_Libertarian": "CORNISH_Libertarian", "COTTAM_PHON": "COTTAM_PHON", "COX_AC": "COX_AC", "CRITCHLEY_PHON": "CRITCHLEY_PHON", "DALONZO_GRN": "DALONZO_GRN", "DALTON_ALP": "DALTON_ALP", "DANNA_ALP": "DANNA_ALP", "DART_NATS": "DART_NATS", "DAVEY_AC": "DAVEY_AC", "DA_SILVA_SFF": "DA_SILVA_SFF", "DCOSTA_AC": "DCOSTA_AC", "DELVES_GRN": "DELVES_GRN", "DENTON_ALP": "DENTON_ALP", "DEVARAPALLI_AC": "DEVARAPALLI_AC", "DEWHURST_IND": "DEWHURST_IND", "DE_CAMPO_LIB": "DE_CAMPO_LIB", "DHANDLI_PHON": "DHANDLI_PHON", "DICKINSON_PHON": "DICKINSON_PHON", "DI_RUSSO_LIB": "DI_RUSSO_LIB", "DI_SOMMA_AC": "DI_SOMMA_AC", "DONCON_GRN": "DONCON_GRN", "DON_GRN": "DON_GRN", "DOOREY_GRN": "DOOREY_GRN", "DOWN_NATS": "DOWN_NATS", "DOWSON_LIB": "DOWSON_LIB", "DOYLE_PHON": "DOYLE_PHON", "DUDEK_LIB": "DUDEK_LIB", "DUNNE_IND": "DUNNE_IND", "DUPONT_GRN": "DUPONT_GRN", "EATTS_NATS": "EATTS_NATS", "EDWARDES_LIB": "EDWARDES_LIB", "EDWARDS_LIB": "EDWARDS_LIB", "EGAN_ALP": "EGAN_ALP", "EMMONS_LCWA": "EMMONS_LCWA", "EVERS_GRN": "EVERS_GRN", "FELS": "FELS", "FENECH_PHON": "FENECH_PHON", "FIRMAGER_GRN": "FIRMAGER_GRN", "FOLEY_LCWA": "FOLEY_LCWA", "FOLKARD_ALP": "FOLKARD_ALP", "FOORD_LIB": "FOORD_LIB", "FOREST_AJP": "FOREST_AJP", "FREEMAN_GRN": "FREEMAN_GRN", "FRENCH_LIB": "FRENCH_LIB", "FULLER_PHON": "FULLER_PHON", "GARG_LIB": "GARG_LIB", "GEMMELL_PHON": "GEMMELL_PHON", "GHASSEMIFAR_Libertarian": "GHASSEMIFAR_Libertarian", "GIBB_LCWA": "GIBB_LCWA", "GIBLETT_NATS": "GIBLETT_NATS", "GIDDENS_ALP": "GIDDENS_ALP", "GILLETT_NATS": "GILLETT_NATS", "GLAHN-BERTELSEN_GRN": "GLAHN-BERTELSEN_GRN", "GLANCE_GRN": "GLANCE_GRN", "GODDEN_GRN": "GODDEN_GRN", "GOIRAN_AC": "GOIRAN_AC", "GOLDING_AC": "GOLDING_AC", "GORDIN_NATS": "GORDIN_NATS", "GORDON-MANLEY_GRN": "GORDON-MANLEY_GRN", "GOULD_AJP": "GOULD_AJP", "GRANADOS_LCWA": "GRANADOS_LCWA", "GRAY_GRN": "GRAY_GRN", "GRIFFITHS_IND": "GRIFFITHS_IND", "GULLAN_LCWA": "GULLAN_LCWA", "GURAK_SFF": "GURAK_SFF", "HALL_AJP": "HALL_AJP", "HALL_GRN": "HALL_GRN", "HALL_PHON": "HALL_PHON", "HAMILTON_ALP": "HAMILTON_ALP", "HAMILTON_SFF": "HAMILTON_SFF", "HAMMAT_ALP": "HAMMAT_ALP", "HANNS_ALP": "HANNS_ALP", "HARDISTY_GRN": "HARDISTY_GRN", "HARRINGTON_GRN": "HARRINGTON_GRN", "HARRIS_AC": "HARRIS_AC", "HARTIGAN_AC": "HARTIGAN_AC", "HAYWARD_GRN": "HAYWARD_GRN", "HEALY_ALP": "HEALY_ALP", "HECQUET_GRN": "HECQUET_GRN", "HEEREMA_PHON": "HEEREMA_PHON", "HELLIWELL_LIB": "HELLIWELL_LIB", "HENDERSON_LIB": "HENDERSON_LIB", "HERMANN_GRN": "HERMANN_GRN", "HERRON_NATS": "HERRON_NATS", "HEYNES_GRN": "HEYNES_GRN", "HILLS_NATS": "HILLS_NATS", "HILL_SPPk": "HILL_SPPk", "HINDMARSH_GRN": "HINDMARSH_GRN", "HIPPISLEY_IND": "HIPPISLEY_IND", "HOLLIER_SFF": "HOLLIER_SFF", "HOLMES_AC": "HOLMES_AC", "HOLTEN_AC": "HOLTEN_AC", "HOLTZHAUSEN_AC": "HOLTZHAUSEN_AC", "HORNCASTLE_IND": "HORNCASTLE_IND", "HORSMAN_IND": "HORSMAN_IND", "HORT_LIB": "HORT_LIB", "HOWARD_IND": "HOWARD_IND", "HOWLETT_IND": "HOWLETT_IND", "HULETT_IND": "HULETT_IND", "HUNTER_NATS": "HUNTER_NATS", "HUNT_LCWA": "HUNT_LCWA", "HUSTON_LIB": "HUSTON_LIB", "IERARDI_PHON": "IERARDI_PHON", "IRONSIDE_PHON": "IRONSIDE_PHON", "JENSEN_AJP": "JENSEN_AJP", "JOHANNSEN_PHON": "JOHANNSEN_PHON", "JOHNSON_SFF": "JOHNSON_SFF", "JONES_ALP": "JONES_ALP", "JONES_LIB": "JONES_LIB", "JOY_AC": "JOY_AC", "KAILIS_LIB": "KAILIS_LIB", "KANNIS_SFF": "KANNIS_SFF", "KEANE_IND": "KEANE_IND", "KEFALINOS_PHON": "KEFALINOS_PHON", "KELLY_ALP": "KELLY_ALP", "KELLY_LIB": "KELLY_LIB", "KELSBIE_ALP": "KELSBIE_ALP", "KENT_ALP": "KENT_ALP", "KEY-ELLISS_AC": "KEY-ELLISS_AC", "KINGSFORD_AC": "KINGSFORD_AC", "KINGSHOTT_LIB": "KINGSHOTT_LIB", "KINGSTON_AC": "KINGSTON_AC", "KING_GRN": "KING_GRN", "KIPLING_LIB": "KIPLING_LIB", "KIRK_LCWA": "KIRK_LCWA", "KLEYN_AC": "KLEYN_AC", "KOUL_NATS": "KOUL_NATS", "KRASENSTEIN_GRN": "KRASENSTEIN_GRN", "KRISHNAN_ALP": "KRISHNAN_ALP", "KUMAR_LIB": "KUMAR_LIB", "LAI_ALP": "LAI_ALP", "LARCOMBE_PHON": "LARCOMBE_PHON", "LAW_LCWA": "LAW_LCWA", "LAZAREVIC_LCWA": "LAZAREVIC_LCWA", "LEAM_GRN": "LEAM_GRN", "LEAN_SFF": "LEAN_SFF", "LEARY_NATS": "LEARY_NATS", "LEECH_LCWA": "LEECH_LCWA", "LESLIE_LCWA": "LESLIE_LCWA", "LEVETT_IND": "LEVETT_IND", "LEWIS_ALP": "LEWIS_ALP", "LILBURNE_ALP": "LILBURNE_ALP", "LINES_PHON": "LINES_PHON", "LING_SPPk": "LING_SPPk", "LIONETTI_IND": "LIONETTI_IND", "LOCKYER_SFF": "LOCKYER_SFF", "LOGAN_NATS": "LOGAN_NATS", "LOMBARD_LIB": "LOMBARD_LIB", "LONSDALE_GRN": "LONSDALE_GRN", "LOVE_NATS": "LOVE_NATS", "MABOOD_PHON": "MABOOD_PHON", "MACLAREN_GRN": "MACLAREN_GRN", "MALCOLM_LCWA": "MALCOLM_LCWA", "MANN_GRN": "MANN_GRN", "MANSFIELD_LIB": "MANSFIELD_LIB", "MARSHALL_ALP": "MARSHALL_ALP", "MARSH_GRN": "MARSH_GRN", "MARSTON_LIB": "MARSTON_LIB", "MATICH_LIB": "MATICH_LIB", "MATTERS_LCWA": "MATTERS_LCWA", "MAVOR_LCWA": "MAVOR_LCWA", "MAYNARD_ALP": "MAYNARD_ALP", "MBANO_LIB": "MBANO_LIB", "MCLENNAN_IND": "MCLENNAN_IND", "MCNAMARA_LIB": "MCNAMARA_LIB", "MELLON_SFF": "MELLON_SFF", "METTAM_LIB": "METTAM_LIB", "MICHAEL_ALP": "MICHAEL_ALP", "MICHEL_ALP": "MICHEL_ALP", "MILES_LIB": "MILES_LIB", "MILES_NATS": "MILES_NATS", "MILNES_LIB": "MILNES_LIB", "MIRONENKO_PHON": "MIRONENKO_PHON", "MONKHOUSE_ALP": "MONKHOUSE_ALP", "MONTGOMERY_AC": "MONTGOMERY_AC", "MOORE_LIB": "MOORE_LIB", "MORRISON_PHON": "MORRISON_PHON", "MORROW_AC": "MORROW_AC", "MUBARAKAI_ALP": "MUBARAKAI_ALP", "MUBARAK_IND": "MUBARAK_IND", "MULDER_LIB": "MULDER_LIB", "MULHOLLAND_LCWA": "MULHOLLAND_LCWA", "MUNDAY_ALP": "MUNDAY_ALP", "MUNRO_SFF": "MUNRO_SFF", "MURPHY_IND": "MURPHY_IND", "MYLES_PHON": "MYLES_PHON", "McCARTHY_GRN": "McCARTHY_GRN", "McDONALD_IND": "McDONALD_IND", "McGURK_ALP": "McGURK_ALP", "McLEAN_GRN": "McLEAN_GRN", "NEWBURY_GRN": "NEWBURY_GRN", "NG_AC": "NG_AC", "NICHOLLS_PHON": "NICHOLLS_PHON", "NICOL_GRN": "NICOL_GRN", "NIELSEN-HARVEY_GRN": "NIELSEN-HARVEY_GRN", "OCONNOR_PHON": "OCONNOR_PHON", "ODEA_LIB": "ODEA_LIB", "ODONNELL_IND": "ODONNELL_IND", "OLIVIERI_GRN": "OLIVIERI_GRN", "OLSEN_LIB": "OLSEN_LIB", "OLSSON_LIB": "OLSSON_LIB", "OMALLEY_ALP": "OMALLEY_ALP", "OREGIONI_PHON": "OREGIONI_PHON", "OSTLE_SFF": "OSTLE_SFF", "OZIES_GRN": "OZIES_GRN", "PAJEWSKI_PHON": "PAJEWSKI_PHON", "PAOLINO_ALP": "PAOLINO_ALP", "PAPALIA_ALP": "PAPALIA_ALP", "PARBAT_LCWA": "PARBAT_LCWA", "PARKIN_PHON": "PARKIN_PHON", "PARSONS_AC": "PARSONS_AC", "PARSONS_NATS": "PARSONS_NATS", "PASTORELLI_ALP": "PASTORELLI_ALP", "PATTERSON_AC": "PATTERSON_AC", "PEARCE_AC": "PEARCE_AC", "PEET_LCWA": "PEET_LCWA", "PEREIRA_LCWA": "PEREIRA_LCWA", "PERKS_GRN": "PERKS_GRN", "PESCH_AC": "PESCH_AC", "PETERS_LCWA": "PETERS_LCWA", "POMANA_PHON": "POMANA_PHON", "POTTER_PHON": "POTTER_PHON", "POULTON_GRN": "POULTON_GRN", "POWLEY_PHON": "POWLEY_PHON", "PRATT_ALP": "PRATT_ALP", "PRETORIUS_AC": "PRETORIUS_AC", "PRICE_ALP": "PRICE_ALP", "PRICE_GRN": "PRICE_GRN", "PUCCIO_GRN": "PUCCIO_GRN", "PUNCH_ALP": "PUNCH_ALP", "PURSER_AC": "PURSER_AC", "QUIN_IND": "QUIN_IND", "RAFFAELLI_SFF": "RAFFAELLI_SFF", "RAI_AC": "RAI_AC", "RANDALL_AC": "RANDALL_AC", "REID_LIB": "REID_LIB", "RENNICK_LCWA": "RENNICK_LCWA", "REYMOND_AC": "REYMOND_AC", "RE_NATS": "RE_NATS", "RICHARDSON_AJP": "RICHARDSON_AJP", "ROBBIE_AC": "ROBBIE_AC", "ROBINS_LIB": "ROBINS_LIB", "ROWE_ALP": "ROWE_ALP", "RUNDLE_NATS": "RUNDLE_NATS", "RUWOLDT_SFF": "RUWOLDT_SFF", "SAFFIOTI_ALP": "SAFFIOTI_ALP", "SAINI_LIB": "SAINI_LIB", "SANDERSON_ALP": "SANDERSON_ALP", "SAO_ALP": "SAO_ALP", "SAPORITA_AJP": "SAPORITA_AJP", "SCAIFE_ALP": "SCAIFE_ALP", "SCHNEIDER_LCWA": "SCHNEIDER_LCWA", "SCLATER_Libertarian": "SCLATER_Libertarian", "SEEBER_LIB": "SEEBER_LIB", "SEPAROVICH_IND": "SEPAROVICH_IND", "SEWELL_GRN": "SEWELL_GRN", "SHARP_LIB": "SHARP_LIB", "SHIPTON_IND": "SHIPTON_IND", "SIMSON_IND": "SIMSON_IND", "SINCLAIR_PHON": "SINCLAIR_PHON", "SINGLETON_SFF": "SINGLETON_SFF", "SMITH_PHON": "SMITH_PHON", "SOUTHWORTH_LCWA": "SOUTHWORTH_LCWA", "SOVA_GRN": "SOVA_GRN", "SPACKMAN_LIB": "SPACKMAN_LIB", "SPENCER-TEO_LIB": "SPENCER-TEO_LIB", "SPRINGER_GRN": "SPRINGER_GRN", "STAER_AC": "STAER_AC", "STALTARI_LIB": "STALTARI_LIB", "STEPHENS_ALP": "STEPHENS_ALP", "STEWART_AC": "STEWART_AC", "STEWART_AJP": "STEWART_AJP", "STOJKOVSKI_ALP": "STOJKOVSKI_ALP", "STOKES_AJP": "STOKES_AJP", "STOKES_IND": "STOKES_IND", "STORER_AJP": "STORER_AJP", "STRAHAN_SFF": "STRAHAN_SFF", "STRAUSS_AC": "STRAUSS_AC", "STURCKE_GRN": "STURCKE_GRN", "SUTHERLAND_LIB": "SUTHERLAND_LIB", "TAN_LIB": "TAN_LIB", "TAYLOR_LCWA": "TAYLOR_LCWA", "TAYLOR_SFF": "TAYLOR_SFF", "THOMAS_AC": "THOMAS_AC", "THOMAS_SFF": "THOMAS_SFF", "THORNTON_IND": "THORNTON_IND", "TILBURY_LIB": "TILBURY_LIB", "TIMNEY_AC": "TIMNEY_AC", "TOMULESCU_PHON": "TOMULESCU_PHON", "TONKIN_ALP": "TONKIN_ALP", "TOWNSEND_GRN": "TOWNSEND_GRN", "TREASURE_LCWA": "TREASURE_LCWA", "TWISS_GRN": "TWISS_GRN", "VADAKKEDATHU_AC": "VADAKKEDATHU_AC", "VAN_BEEK_LCWA": "VAN_BEEK_LCWA", "VAN_VEEN_SFF": "VAN_VEEN_SFF", "VASHISHT_LIB": "VASHISHT_LIB", "VELOO_AC": "VELOO_AC", "VERMEULEN_PHON": "VERMEULEN_PHON", "VLAAR_AJP": "VLAAR_AJP", "WAGHORN_SPPk": "WAGHORN_SPPk", "WALKER_SFF": "WALKER_SFF", "WALSH_GRN": "WALSH_GRN", "WARBURTON_AC": "WARBURTON_AC", "WARR_NATS": "WARR_NATS", "WATSON_AC": "WATSON_AC", "WATT_AC": "WATT_AC", "WAUGH_LIB": "WAUGH_LIB", "WHITBY_ALP": "WHITBY_ALP", "WHITTEN_PHON": "WHITTEN_PHON", "WIESE_AC": "WIESE_AC", "WILKINSON_LCWA": "WILKINSON_LCWA", "WILKINSON_PHON": "WILKINSON_PHON", "WILLIAMSON_SFF": "WILLIAMSON_SFF", "WILLIAMS_ALP": "WILLIAMS_ALP", "WILLIS_ALP": "WILLIS_ALP", "WINTON_ALP": "WINTON_ALP", "WORTH_GRN": "WORTH_GRN", "YAP_AC": "YAP_AC", "YATES_SFF": "YATES_SFF", "YEAP_AC": "YEAP_AC", "YEH_LCWA": "YEH_LCWA", "YOUNG_GRN": "YOUNG_GRN", "YOUNG_LCWA": "YOUNG_LCWA", "YOW_AC": "YOW_AC", "YU_LCWA": "YU_LCWA", "ZEMPILAS_LIB": "ZEMPILAS_LIB", "ZHUANG_AC": "ZHUANG_AC", "ZWIKIELBERG_PHON": "ZWIKIELBERG_PHON", "de_LACY_IND": "de_LACY_IND", "de_VRIES_IND": "de_VRIES_IND", "van_STYN_IND": "van_STYN_IND"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 974, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 974, "registered_not_positive": 974}, "n_stations_flagged": 974, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:56.267419", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.804, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.844, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.793, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.802, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.15, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.029, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.029, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 974}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d937d9c088f0436c91d0d5cbf72117d3", "name": "Spain 2022 local (overnight spain_andalucia_2022_parlamento_municipio.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://resultadoseleccionesandalucia.es/ (SIEL API https://ws040.juntadeandalucia.es/siel-api; tconvocatoria=5 fconvocatoria=202206)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"nummesas": "nummesas", "PP": "PP", "PSOE-A": "PSOE-A", "VOX": "VOX", "PorA": "PorA", "Cs": "Cs", "ADELANTE_ANDALUC\u00cdA-ANDALUCISTAS": "ADELANTE_ANDALUC\u00cdA-ANDALUCISTAS", "PACMA": "PACMA", "PUM+J": "PUM+J", "AL": "AL", "FE_de_las_JONS": "FE_de_las_JONS", "PCPA": "PCPA", "RECORTES_CERO-IPAL": "RECORTES_CERO-IPAL", "ESCA\u00d1OS_EN_BLANCO": "ESCA\u00d1OS_EN_BLANCO", "N_A": "N_A", "PARTIDO_AUT\u00d3NOMOS": "PARTIDO_AUT\u00d3NOMOS", "CRSxA": "CRSxA", "RECORTES_CERO": "RECORTES_CERO", "PCTE": "PCTE", "JxG": "JxG", "Federaci\u00f3n_BASTA_YA!": "Federaci\u00f3n_BASTA_YA!", "IZAR": "IZAR", "JUFUDI": "JUFUDI", "XH": "XH", "JM+": "JM+", "RECORTES_CERO-JV": "RECORTES_CERO-JV", "VOLT": "VOLT", "DESPIERTA": "DESPIERTA", "SOMOS_FUTURO": "SOMOS_FUTURO", "LOS_VERDES": "LOS_VERDES"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 785, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 67}, "n_stations_flagged": 67, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:51.941807", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.945, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.908, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.867, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.782, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.725, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.725, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.901, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 785}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "976404455c9d46aaac9346f52e60cd57", "name": "Australia 2022 local (overnight australia_sa_2022_house_of_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.ecsa.sa.gov.au/component/edocman/244-2022se-house-of-assembly-first-preference-results-by-district-and-polling-place/download?Itemid=0", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"enrolled_district": "enrolled_district", "ADAMS, Lisa (GRN)": "ADAMS, Lisa (GRN)", "ALEXANDRIDES, Paul (ALP)": "ALEXANDRIDES, Paul (ALP)", "ALLWOOD, Alexander (ONP)": "ALLWOOD, Alexander (ONP)", "ALLWOOD, Gayle (ONP)": "ALLWOOD, Gayle (ONP)", "AMES, Trent (ALP)": "AMES, Trent (ALP)", "ANDREWS, Sarah (ALP)": "ANDREWS, Sarah (ALP)", "ANTONIO, Tom (SAB)": "ANTONIO, Tom (SAB)", "ATKINSON, Diane (GRN)": "ATKINSON, Diane (GRN)", "BAKER, Dayle (FFP)": "BAKER, Dayle (FFP)", "BALFORT, Gary Newton (FFP)": "BALFORT, Gary Newton (FFP)", "BANKS, Alex (AFP)": "BANKS, Alex (AFP)", "BARRY, Lynton (FFP)": "BARRY, Lynton (FFP)", "BASHAM, David (LIB)": "BASHAM, David (LIB)", "BEDFORD, Frances (IND)": "BEDFORD, Frances (IND)", "BELL, Troy (IND)": "BELL, Troy (IND)", "BENNETT, John William (FFP)": "BENNETT, John William (FFP)", "BETTISON, Zoe (ALP)": "BETTISON, Zoe (ALP)", "BIGNELL, Leon (ALP)": "BIGNELL, Leon (ALP)", "BIRDSEYE, Tom (RCH)": "BIRDSEYE, Tom (RCH)", "BOURNE, Anne (GRN)": "BOURNE, Anne (GRN)", "BOYER, Blair (ALP)": "BOYER, Blair (ALP)", "BRAES, Mark (ALP)": "BRAES, Mark (ALP)", "BRAY, Frankie (AJP)": "BRAY, Frankie (AJP)", "BROCK, Geoff (IND)": "BROCK, Geoff (IND)", "BROWN, Michael (ALP)": "BROWN, Michael (ALP)", "BUIJS, Damien (NAT)": "BUIJS, Damien (NAT)", "CAMPBELL, Steve (AJP)": "CAMPBELL, Steve (AJP)", "CARBONE, Deanna (AJP)": "CARBONE, Deanna (AJP)", "CARLI, Dominic (FFP)": "CARLI, Dominic (FFP)", "CASEY, Dan (AFP)": "CASEY, Dan (AFP)", "CASHEL, Deb (GRN)": "CASHEL, Deb (GRN)", "CAULFIELD, Finn (GRN)": "CAULFIELD, Finn (GRN)", "CAVANAGH, Busby (GRN)": "CAVANAGH, Busby (GRN)", "CHAMPION, Nick (ALP)": "CHAMPION, Nick (ALP)", "CHAPLIN, Padma (AJP)": "CHAPLIN, Padma (AJP)", "CHAPMAN, Vickie (LIB)": "CHAPMAN, Vickie (LIB)", "CHARLES, Nicholas (LIB)": "CHARLES, Nicholas (LIB)", "CHARVETTO, Ashton (ALP)": "CHARVETTO, Ashton (ALP)", "CLANCY, Nadia (ALP)": "CLANCY, Nadia (ALP)", "CLOSE, Susan (ALP)": "CLOSE, Susan (ALP)", "COOK, Nat (ALP)": "COOK, Nat (ALP)", "COWDREY, Matt (LIB)": "COWDREY, Matt (LIB)", "CREGAN, Dan (IND)": "CREGAN, Dan (IND)", "CROSBY-WRIGHT, Cathryn (FFP)": "CROSBY-WRIGHT, Cathryn (FFP)", "CROWLEY, Michelle (ONP)": "CROWLEY, Michelle (ONP)", "CRUZ, Helika (LIB)": "CRUZ, Helika (LIB)", "CULLEN-MACASKILL, Sean (GRN)": "CULLEN-MACASKILL, Sean (GRN)", "DALLIMORE, Glen (ALP)": "DALLIMORE, Glen (ALP)", "DALTON, Tracey (FFP)": "DALTON, Tracey (FFP)", "DAVE, Hemant (LIB)": "DAVE, Hemant (LIB)", "DAVIES, Katherine (ALP)": "DAVIES, Katherine (ALP)", "DAVIS, Tracey (GRN)": "DAVIS, Tracey (GRN)", "DE JONGE, Rob (IND)": "DE JONGE, Rob (IND)", "DEAR, Baeley (GRN)": "DEAR, Baeley (GRN)", "DIGHTON, Alex (ALP)": "DIGHTON, Alex (ALP)", "DINOVITSER, Alex (GRN)": "DINOVITSER, Alex (GRN)", "DODD, Jordan (LIB)": "DODD, Jordan (LIB)", "DRAGE, Barry (ONP)": "DRAGE, Barry (ONP)", "DULUK, Sam (IND)": "DULUK, Sam (IND)", "DUNCAN, David (ONP)": "DUNCAN, David (ONP)", "ECKERSLEY, Fiona (AJP)": "ECKERSLEY, Fiona (AJP)", "ELLIS, Fraser (IND)": "ELLIS, Fraser (IND)", "FEDCZYSZYN, Jake (LIB)": "FEDCZYSZYN, Jake (LIB)", "FELEPPA, Sab (ONP)": "FELEPPA, Sab (ONP)", "FERRIS, Brett (GRN)": "FERRIS, Brett (GRN)", "FRANCIS, Mathew (FFP)": "FRANCIS, Mathew (FFP)", "FREELING, Ben (AJP)": "FREELING, Ben (AJP)", "FULBROOK, John (ALP)": "FULBROOK, John (ALP)", "GAME, Jennifer (ONP)": "GAME, Jennifer (ONP)", "GARDNER, John (LIB)": "GARDNER, John (LIB)", "GARROOD, Jason (GRN)": "GARROOD, Jason (GRN)", "GERHARD, Alfred (FFP)": "GERHARD, Alfred (FFP)", "GIEHR, Pam (ONP)": "GIEHR, Pam (ONP)", "GOLDING, Dan (IND)": "GOLDING, Dan (IND)", "GREEN, Brett (FFP)": "GREEN, Brett (FFP)", "GREEN, Felicity (GRN)": "GREEN, Felicity (GRN)", "HABERMANN, Liz (IND)": "HABERMANN, Liz (IND)", "HACKETT, Benjamin (FFP)": "HACKETT, Benjamin (FFP)", "HALL-EVANS, Jake (LIB)": "HALL-EVANS, Jake (LIB)", "HAMMERSTEIN, Millie (AJP)": "HAMMERSTEIN, Millie (AJP)", "HARDWICK-FRANCO, Kathryn (GRN)": "HARDWICK-FRANCO, Kathryn (GRN)", "HARRISON, Ryan (ALP)": "HARRISON, Ryan (ALP)", "HART, Georgie (GRN)": "HART, Georgie (GRN)", "HARVEY, Richard (LIB)": "HARVEY, Richard (LIB)", "HEAVEN, Peter (FFP)": "HEAVEN, Peter (FFP)", "HEGGIE, Peter (ONP)": "HEGGIE, Peter (ONP)", "HENDERSON, Ursula (LIB)": "HENDERSON, Ursula (LIB)", "HILDYARD, Katrine (ALP)": "HILDYARD, Katrine (ALP)", "HOEBEE, Eldert (RCH)": "HOEBEE, Eldert (RCH)", "HOLLOWAY, Tony (FFP)": "HOLLOWAY, Tony (FFP)", "HOLMES-ROSS, Heather Lynn (IND)": "HOLMES-ROSS, Heather Lynn (IND)", "HOOD, Ben (LIB)": "HOOD, Ben (LIB)", "HOOD, Lucy (ALP)": "HOOD, Lucy (ALP)", "HUEPPAUFF, Amy (ALP)": "HUEPPAUFF, Amy (ALP)", "HUGHES, Eddie (ALP)": "HUGHES, Eddie (ALP)", "HUNTER, Cate (IND)": "HUNTER, Cate (IND)", "HURN, Ashton (LIB)": "HURN, Ashton (LIB)", "HURST, Cameron (ALP)": "HURST, Cameron (ALP)", "HUSSEY, Nicole (AFP)": "HUSSEY, Nicole (AFP)", "HUTCHESSON, Catherine (ALP)": "HUTCHESSON, Catherine (ALP)", "HUTCHINSON, Jodi (RCH)": "HUTCHINSON, Jodi (RCH)", "HYDE, Alexander (LIB)": "HYDE, Alexander (LIB)", "IENCO, Joe (NAT)": "IENCO, Joe (NAT)", "IERACI, Peter (AFP)": "IERACI, Peter (AFP)", "ILLINGWORTH, John (NAT)": "ILLINGWORTH, John (NAT)", "IVESON, Tristan (ONP)": "IVESON, Tristan (ONP)", "JOHNS, Joseph (GRN)": "JOHNS, Joseph (GRN)", "JOHNSTON, Caterina (ONP)": "JOHNSTON, Caterina (ONP)", "JOSE, Rojan (FFP)": "JOSE, Rojan (FFP)", "JOSHUA, Mervin (FFP)": "JOSHUA, Mervin (FFP)", "JOVANOVIC, Radosav (FFP)": "JOVANOVIC, Radosav (FFP)", "JOYCE, Wendy Leanne (FFP)": "JOYCE, Wendy Leanne (FFP)", "KEEN, Airlie (IND)": "KEEN, Airlie (IND)", "KOUTSANTONIS, Tom (ALP)": "KOUTSANTONIS, Tom (ALP)", "KOWALIW, Tessa (IND)": "KOWALIW, Tessa (IND)", "KUHLMANN, Rita (IND)": "KUHLMANN, Rita (IND)", "LE CERF, Brock (GRN)": "LE CERF, Brock (GRN)", "LEESE, Beth (GRN)": "LEESE, Beth (GRN)", "LESIW, Mike (IND)": "LESIW, Mike (IND)", "LESLIE, Fiona (FFP)": "LESLIE, Fiona (FFP)", "LOCK, Cameron (FFP)": "LOCK, Cameron (FFP)", "LOCK, Dominique (GRN)": "LOCK, Dominique (GRN)", "LOCK, Shawn (LIB)": "LOCK, Shawn (LIB)", "LOUTH, Peta-Anne (GRN)": "LOUTH, Peta-Anne (GRN)", "LUETHEN, Paula (LIB)": "LUETHEN, Paula (LIB)", "LUTMAN, John (ONP)": "LUTMAN, John (ONP)", "MALINAUSKAS, Peter (ALP)": "MALINAUSKAS, Peter (ALP)", "MARLEY-DUNCAN, Hayley Christina (ONP)": "MARLEY-DUNCAN, Hayley Christina (ONP)", "MAROZZI, Matthew (ALP)": "MAROZZI, Matthew (ALP)", "MARSHALL, Steven (LIB)": "MARSHALL, Steven (LIB)", "MASULLO, Daniel (FFP)": "MASULLO, Daniel (FFP)", "MATTISKE, Adla (GRN)": "MATTISKE, Adla (GRN)", "MCBRIDE, Nick (LIB)": "MCBRIDE, Nick (LIB)", "MCCANN, Daryl (FFP)": "MCCANN, Daryl (FFP)", "MCCOMB, John (FFP)": "MCCOMB, John (FFP)", "MCGEE, Alexandra (GRN)": "MCGEE, Alexandra (GRN)", "MCLAREN, Chad (LIB)": "MCLAREN, Chad (LIB)", "MCSHANE, Janice (LIB)": "MCSHANE, Janice (LIB)", "MEDROW, Steffi (GRN)": "MEDROW, Steffi (GRN)", "MICHAEL, Tom (LIB)": "MICHAEL, Tom (LIB)", "MICHAELS, Andrea (ALP)": "MICHAELS, Andrea (ALP)", "MIDZI, Jaison (IND)": "MIDZI, Jaison (IND)", "MINAHAN, Alisha (FFP)": "MINAHAN, Alisha (FFP)", "MOLDOVAN, John (FFP)": "MOLDOVAN, John (FFP)", "MOLLER, Patrick (LIB)": "MOLLER, Patrick (LIB)", "MONCRIEFF, Kay (GRN)": "MONCRIEFF, Kay (GRN)", "MORRIS, Beverley (GRN)": "MORRIS, Beverley (GRN)", "MOSS, Jim (GRN)": "MOSS, Jim (GRN)", "MOUNT, Jane (GRN)": "MOUNT, Jane (GRN)", "MUELLER, Phill (ONP)": "MUELLER, Phill (ONP)", "MULLIGHAN, Stephen (ALP)": "MULLIGHAN, Stephen (ALP)", "MUMFORD, Rowan (LIB)": "MUMFORD, Rowan (LIB)", "MURRAY, Steve (LIB)": "MURRAY, Steve (LIB)", "NANCARROW, Kym (FFP)": "NANCARROW, Kym (FFP)", "NICHOLSON, Lou (IND)": "NICHOLSON, Lou (IND)", "NIKITINS, Belinda (FFP)": "NIKITINS, Belinda (FFP)", "O'HANLON, Cressida (ALP)": "O'HANLON, Cressida (ALP)", "ODENWALDER, Lee (ALP)": "ODENWALDER, Lee (ALP)", "OWENS, Belinda (ALP)": "OWENS, Belinda (ALP)", "PANAYIOTOU, Lazaras (GRN)": "PANAYIOTOU, Lazaras (GRN)", "PASTRO, Matt (AJP)": "PASTRO, Matt (AJP)", "PATTERSON, Stephen (LIB)": "PATTERSON, Stephen (LIB)", "PAULL, Mark (ALP)": "PAULL, Mark (ALP)", "PAYNE, Andrew (GRN)": "PAYNE, Andrew (GRN)", "PEARCE, Rhiannon (ALP)": "PEARCE, Rhiannon (ALP)", "PEDERICK, Adrian (LIB)": "PEDERICK, Adrian (LIB)", "PETHO, Martin (FFP)": "PETHO, Martin (FFP)", "PETRILLI, Michael (GRN)": "PETRILLI, Michael (GRN)", "PHOTAKIS, John Alexander (GRN)": "PHOTAKIS, John Alexander (GRN)", "PICCOLO, Tony (ALP)": "PICCOLO, Tony (ALP)", "PICTON, Chris (ALP)": "PICTON, Chris (ALP)", "PIETZSCH, Jonathan (NAT)": "PIETZSCH, Jonathan (NAT)", "PISONI, David (LIB)": "PISONI, David (LIB)", "POWER, Carolyn (LIB)": "POWER, Carolyn (LIB)", "POYNTER, Lillian (NAT)": "POYNTER, Lillian (NAT)", "PRATT, Penny (LIB)": "PRATT, Penny (LIB)", "PREECE, Bruce (NAT)": "PREECE, Bruce (NAT)", "PRICE, Steven (FFP)": "PRICE, Steven (FFP)", "QUAREMBA, Carlos (ONP)": "QUAREMBA, Carlos (ONP)", "QUINN, Shane (IND)": "QUINN, Shane (IND)", "RANA, Saru (LIB)": "RANA, Saru (LIB)", "RANDELL, Kate (GRN)": "RANDELL, Kate (GRN)", "REBANE, Lea (IND)": "REBANE, Lea (IND)", "REYNOLDS, Graham (LIB)": "REYNOLDS, Graham (LIB)", "RIX, Shane (LIB)": "RIX, Shane (LIB)", "ROBINS, Nick (LIB)": "ROBINS, Nick (LIB)", "ROMEO, Adrian Eduardo (AJP)": "ROMEO, Adrian Eduardo (AJP)", "SANDERSON, Rachel (LIB)": "SANDERSON, Rachel (LIB)", "SANTAGATA, Michael (LIB)": "SANTAGATA, Michael (LIB)", "SARRE, Rick (ALP)": "SARRE, Rick (ALP)", "SAVVAS, Olivia (ALP)": "SAVVAS, Olivia (ALP)", "SCHLOITHE, Trevor (GRN)": "SCHLOITHE, Trevor (GRN)", "SCOTT, Tonya (ONP)": "SCOTT, Tonya (ONP)", "SEE, Rolando (FFP)": "SEE, Rolando (FFP)", "SELWOOD, Melanie (GRN)": "SELWOOD, Melanie (GRN)", "SHARMA, Sarika (LIB)": "SHARMA, Sarika (LIB)", "SHERLOCK, David (AJP)": "SHERLOCK, David (AJP)", "SILSBURY, Loma (NAT)": "SILSBURY, Loma (NAT)", "SIMPSON, Kate (RCH)": "SIMPSON, Kate (RCH)", "SIRES, David John (FFP)": "SIRES, David John (FFP)", "SLAVIN, Autumn (GRN)": "SLAVIN, Autumn (GRN)", "SMALLWOOD, Tracey (GRN)": "SMALLWOOD, Tracey (GRN)", "SMITH, Joshua (LDP)": "SMITH, Joshua (LDP)", "SNELLING, Lucia (FFP)": "SNELLING, Lucia (FFP)", "SPEIRS, David (LIB)": "SPEIRS, David (LIB)", "STINSON, Jayne (ALP)": "STINSON, Jayne (ALP)", "STONE, David (ONP)": "STONE, David (ONP)", "SUTTON, Joanne (ALP)": "SUTTON, Joanne (ALP)", "SZAKACS, Joe (ALP)": "SZAKACS, Joe (ALP)", "TARZIA, Vincent (LIB)": "TARZIA, Vincent (LIB)", "TAYLOR, Graham (LIB)": "TAYLOR, Graham (LIB)", "TEAGUE, Josh (LIB)": "TEAGUE, Josh (LIB)", "TELFER, Sam (LIB)": "TELFER, Sam (LIB)", "TENNIKOFF, Alex (FFP)": "TENNIKOFF, Alex (FFP)", "THOMPSON, Erin (ALP)": "THOMPSON, Erin (ALP)", "TIDEMANN, Liz (GRN)": "TIDEMANN, Liz (GRN)", "TURNER, Ken (FFP)": "TURNER, Ken (FFP)", "TYNAN, Sarah (ALP)": "TYNAN, Sarah (ALP)", "VAID, Rajan (ONP)": "VAID, Rajan (ONP)", "VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN, Dan (LIB)": "VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN, Dan (LIB)", "VONOW, Lynton (GRN)": "VONOW, Lynton (GRN)", "VOOGT, Rowan (ALP)": "VOOGT, Rowan (ALP)", "WALKER, Robert (AFP)": "WALKER, Robert (AFP)", "WALTER, Dianah (IND)": "WALTER, Dianah (IND)", "WATSON, Connor (ALP)": "WATSON, Connor (ALP)", "WEATHERLY, Sean (GRN)": "WEATHERLY, Sean (GRN)", "WHETSTONE, Tim (LIB)": "WHETSTONE, Tim (LIB)", "WHITE, Brendan (GRN)": "WHITE, Brendan (GRN)", "WHITE, Kerry (ONP)": "WHITE, Kerry (ONP)", "WHITE, Timothy (GRN)": "WHITE, Timothy (GRN)", "WILLIAMS, Amy (LIB)": "WILLIAMS, Amy (LIB)", "WILLIAMSON, Andrew (LIB)": "WILLIAMSON, Andrew (LIB)", "WINGARD, Corey (LIB)": "WINGARD, Corey (LIB)", "WISHART, John (GRN)": "WISHART, John (GRN)", "WORTLEY, Dana (ALP)": "WORTLEY, Dana (ALP)", "WRIGHT, Andrew (ALP)": "WRIGHT, Andrew (ALP)", "WRIGHT, Ashley (NAT)": "WRIGHT, Ashley (NAT)", "WRIGHT, David (GRN)": "WRIGHT, David (GRN)", "ZOLLO, Nick (FFP)": "ZOLLO, Nick (FFP)", "ZSCHECH, Lionel (AFP)": "ZSCHECH, Lionel (AFP)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 696, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 696, "cast_gt_registered": 696, "votes_gt_valid": 696}, "n_stations_flagged": 696, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:48.889971", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.841, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.794, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.067, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.919, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.033, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.033, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 696}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bf1990aa89034bc7b215fcf549532a13", "name": "Germany 2023 local (overnight germany_bremen_2023_buergerschaft.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.wahlen-bremen.de/Wahlen/2023_05_14/ (votemanager presenter; per-area HTML 'Stimmen tabellarisch' tables, data-sort integer counts)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_CDU": "votes_CDU", "votes_SPD": "votes_SPD", "votes_GR\u00dcNE": "votes_GR\u00dcNE", "votes_DIE LINKE": "votes_DIE LINKE", "votes_FDP": "votes_FDP", "votes_BIW": "votes_BIW", "votes_Die PARTEI": "votes_Die PARTEI", "votes_dieBasis": "votes_dieBasis", "votes_GFA": "votes_GFA", "votes_MLPD": "votes_MLPD", "votes_MERA25": "votes_MERA25", "votes_\u00d6DP": "votes_\u00d6DP", "votes_Verj\u00fcngungsforschung": "votes_Verj\u00fcngungsforschung", "votes_Tierschutzpartei": "votes_Tierschutzpartei", "votes_Volt": "votes_Volt", "votes_PIRATEN": "votes_PIRATEN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 423, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 423}, "n_stations_flagged": 423, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:44.979303", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.855, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.812, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.015, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.015, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 423}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "60b3d9b839834e6e982e1465eb49a2eb", "name": "India 2022 local (overnight uttar_pradesh_2022_vidhan_sabha.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AAP": "AAP", "AD_S": "AD_S", "AIMIM": "AIMIM", "BJP": "BJP", "BSP": "BSP", "INC": "INC", "NISHAD": "NISHAD", "NOTA": "NOTA", "Other": "Other", "RLD": "RLD", "SBSP": "SBSP", "SP": "SP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 403, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 403, "registered_not_positive": 403}, "n_stations_flagged": 403, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:42.988530", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.384, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.291, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.384, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.384, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.291, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.291, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.553, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.764, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.442, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 403}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "95c654902c1f4722b14a2822fbfa3748", "name": "India 2021 local (overnight india_west_bengal_2021_vidhan_sabha.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ac_no": "ac_no", "AIFB": "AIFB", "AITC": "AITC", "BJP": "BJP", "BSP": "BSP", "CPI": "CPI", "CPM": "CPM", "INC": "INC", "NOTA": "NOTA", "OTHER": "OTHER", "RSP": "RSP", "SUCI_C": "SUCI_C"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 292, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 292, "cast_gt_registered": 292, "votes_gt_valid": 292}, "n_stations_flagged": 292, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:41.200780", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.398, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.307, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.398, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.398, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.307, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.307, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.234, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.234, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.687, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.466, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.466, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 292}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8915439dd6af4eadb884f9507cd4db51", "name": "India 2024 local (overnight india_maharashtra_2024_vidhansabha.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.eci.gov.in/ResultAcGenNov2024/ (ECI official; mirror: github.com/RadhikaBadkhal/Maharashtra_Election_Result-2024 Dataset/maha_results_2024.csv)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ac_no": "ac_no", "Aadarsh Sangram Party": "Aadarsh Sangram Party", "Aapki Apni Party (Peoples)": "Aapki Apni Party (Peoples)", "Aazad Samaj Party (Kanshi Ram)": "Aazad Samaj Party (Kanshi Ram)", "Abhinav Bharat Janseva Paksh": "Abhinav Bharat Janseva Paksh", "Abhinav Bharat Party": "Abhinav Bharat Party", "Aim Political Party": "Aim Political Party", "Akhand Hind Party": "Akhand Hind Party", "Akhil Bharatiya Muslim League (Secular)": "Akhil Bharatiya Muslim League (Secular)", "Akhil Bharatiya Sena": "Akhil Bharatiya Sena", "Akhil Bhartiya Ekata Party": "Akhil Bhartiya Ekata Party", "Akhil Bhartiya Parivar Party": "Akhil Bhartiya Parivar Party", "All India Forward Bloc": "All India Forward Bloc", "All India Hindustan Congress Party": "All India Hindustan Congress Party", "All India Majlis-E-Inquilab-E-Millat": "All India Majlis-E-Inquilab-E-Millat", "All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen": "All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen", "All India National Raksha Sena": "All India National Raksha Sena", "All Indian Republican Party": "All Indian Republican Party", "Ambedkarist Republican Party": "Ambedkarist Republican Party", "Ambedkarite Party of India": "Ambedkarite Party of India", "Apni Prajahit Party": "Apni Prajahit Party", "Azad Samaj Party": "Azad Samaj Party", "Bahujan Bharat Party": "Bahujan Bharat Party", "Bahujan Maha Party": "Bahujan Maha Party", "Bahujan Republican Socialist Party": "Bahujan Republican Socialist Party", "Bahujan Samaj Party": "Bahujan Samaj Party", "Bahujan Samaj Party (Ambedkar)": "Bahujan Samaj Party (Ambedkar)", "Bahujan Vikas Aaghadi": "Bahujan Vikas Aaghadi", "Baliraja Party": "Baliraja Party", "Bharat Adivasi Party": "Bharat Adivasi Party", "Bharat Jan Aadhar Party": "Bharat Jan Aadhar Party", "Bharat Jodo Party": "Bharat Jodo Party", "Bharatheeya Jawan Kisan Party": "Bharatheeya Jawan Kisan Party", "Bharatiya Congress Paksha": "Bharatiya Congress Paksha", "Bharatiya Janata Party": "Bharatiya Janata Party", "Bharatiya Lokvikas Party": "Bharatiya Lokvikas Party", "Bharatiya Praja Surajya Paksha": "Bharatiya Praja Surajya Paksha", "Bharatiya Yuva Jan Ekta Party": "Bharatiya Yuva Jan Ekta Party", "Bhartiya Asmita Party": "Bhartiya Asmita Party", "Bhartiya Dharmanirpeksha Party": "Bhartiya Dharmanirpeksha Party", "Bhartiya Jan Samrat Party": "Bhartiya Jan Samrat Party", "Bhartiya Jan Vikas Aaghadi": "Bhartiya Jan Vikas Aaghadi", "Bhartiya Mahasangh Party": "Bhartiya Mahasangh Party", "Bhartiya Navjawan Sena (Paksha)": "Bhartiya Navjawan Sena (Paksha)", "Bhartiya Tribal Party": "Bhartiya Tribal Party", "Bhartiya Veer Kisan Party": "Bhartiya Veer Kisan Party", "Bhim Sena": "Bhim Sena", "Blue India Party": "Blue India Party", "Buland Bharat Party": "Buland Bharat Party", "Changemakers Party": "Changemakers Party", "Communist Party of India": "Communist Party of India", "Communist Party of India (Marxist)": "Communist Party of India (Marxist)", "Dalit Soshit Pichhara Varg Adhikar Dal": "Dalit Soshit Pichhara Varg Adhikar Dal", "Delhi Janta Party": "Delhi Janta Party", "Desh Janhit Party": "Desh Janhit Party", "Dhanwan Bharat Party": "Dhanwan Bharat Party", "Digital Organization of Nation Party": "Digital Organization of Nation Party", "Gondvana Gantantra Party": "Gondvana Gantantra Party", "Hamar Raj Party": "Hamar Raj Party", "Hindrashtra Sangh": "Hindrashtra Sangh", "Hindu Samaj Party": "Hindu Samaj Party", "Hindustan Jansewa Paksh": "Hindustan Jansewa Paksh", "Hindustan Janta Party": "Hindustan Janta Party", "Independent": "Independent", "Indian National Congress": "Indian National Congress", "Indian National League": "Indian National League", "Indian Political Congress Party": "Indian Political Congress Party", "Indian Secular Largest Assembly of Maharashtra": "Indian Secular Largest Assembly of Maharashtra", "Indian Union Muslim League": "Indian Union Muslim League", "Insaniyat Party": "Insaniyat Party", "Jai Hind Jai Bharat Rashtriya Party": "Jai Hind Jai Bharat Rashtriya Party", "Jai Sewalal Bahujan Vikas Party": "Jai Sewalal Bahujan Vikas Party", "Jan Janwadi Party": "Jan Janwadi Party", "Jan Surajya Shakti": "Jan Surajya Shakti", "Janata Congress": "Janata Congress", "Janata Dal (Secular)": "Janata Dal (Secular)", "Janhit Lokshahi Party": "Janhit Lokshahi Party", "Janseva Gondwana Party": "Janseva Gondwana Party", "Jantantrik Samta Party": "Jantantrik Samta Party", "Jay Vidarbha Party": "Jay Vidarbha Party", "Kamgaar Kisan Party": "Kamgaar Kisan Party", "Kunbi Bahujan Sawrajya Party": "Kunbi Bahujan Sawrajya Party", "Lok Swarajya Party": "Lok Swarajya Party", "Lokataantrik Janaadhaar Party": "Lokataantrik Janaadhaar Party", "Lokmudra Janhit Party": "Lokmudra Janhit Party", "Lokrajya Janata Party": "Lokrajya Janata Party", "Lokrajya Party": "Lokrajya Party", "Lokshahi Ekta Party": "Lokshahi Ekta Party", "Lokshahi Party": "Lokshahi Party", "Maharashtra Lokhitwadi Party": "Maharashtra Lokhitwadi Party", "Maharashtra Navnirman sena": "Maharashtra Navnirman sena", "Maharashtra Rajya Samiti": "Maharashtra Rajya Samiti", "Maharashtra Swarajya party": "Maharashtra Swarajya party", "Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi": "Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi", "Marathwada Mukti Morcha": "Marathwada Mukti Morcha", "Marxist Leninist Party of India (Red Flag)": "Marxist Leninist Party of India (Red Flag)", "Mera Adhikaar Rashtriya Dal": "Mera Adhikaar Rashtriya Dal", "Minorities Democratic Party": "Minorities Democratic Party", "Nagrik Vikas Party": "Nagrik Vikas Party", "Naki Bharatiya Ekta Party": "Naki Bharatiya Ekta Party", "National World Leader Party": "National World Leader Party", "Nationalist Congress Party": "Nationalist Congress Party", "Nationalist Congress Party- Sharadchandra Pawar": "Nationalist Congress Party- Sharadchandra Pawar", "Netaji Congress Sena": "Netaji Congress Sena", "New Rashtriya Samaj Party": "New Rashtriya Samaj Party", "Nirbhay Maharashtra Party": "Nirbhay Maharashtra Party", "None of the Above": "None of the Above", "Open people\u2019s Party": "Open people\u2019s Party", "Peace Party": "Peace Party", "Peasants And Workers Party of India": "Peasants And Workers Party of India", "Peoples Party of India (Democratic)": "Peoples Party of India (Democratic)", "People\u2019s Union Party": "People\u2019s Union Party", "Prahar Janshakti Party": "Prahar Janshakti Party", "Rajarshi Shahu Vikas Aghadi": "Rajarshi Shahu Vikas Aghadi", "Rashtra Samarpan Party": "Rashtra Samarpan Party", "Rashtriya Balmiki Sena Paksha": "Rashtriya Balmiki Sena Paksha", "Rashtriya Gondvana Party": "Rashtriya Gondvana Party", "Rashtriya Janmanch (Secular)": "Rashtriya Janmanch (Secular)", "Rashtriya Maratha Party": "Rashtriya Maratha Party", "Rashtriya Samaj Dal (R)": "Rashtriya Samaj Dal (R)", "Rashtriya Samaj Paksha": "Rashtriya Samaj Paksha", "Rashtriya Swarajya Sena": "Rashtriya Swarajya Sena", "Rashtriya Ulama Council": "Rashtriya Ulama Council", "Rashtriya Yuva Swabhiman Party": "Rashtriya Yuva Swabhiman Party", "Republican Bahujan Sena": "Republican Bahujan Sena", "Republican Paksha (Khoripa)": "Republican Paksha (Khoripa)", "Republican Party of India (A)": "Republican Party of India (A)", "Republican Party of India (Democratic )": "Republican Party of India (Democratic )", "Republican Party of India (Khobragade)": "Republican Party of India (Khobragade)", "Republican Party of India (Reformist)": "Republican Party of India (Reformist)", "Republican Sena": "Republican Sena", "Revolutionary Marxist Party of India": "Revolutionary Marxist Party of India", "Right to Recall Party": "Right to Recall Party", "Sainik Samaj Party": "Sainik Samaj Party", "Samajwadi Party": "Samajwadi Party", "Samata Party": "Samata Party", "Sambhaji Brigade Party": "Sambhaji Brigade Party", "Samnak Janta Party": "Samnak Janta Party", "Sampoorna Bharat Kranti Party": "Sampoorna Bharat Kranti Party", "Sanay Chatrapati Shasan": "Sanay Chatrapati Shasan", "Sangharsh Sena": "Sangharsh Sena", "Sanman Rajkiya Paksha": "Sanman Rajkiya Paksha", "Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Party": "Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Party", "Shiv Sena": "Shiv Sena", "Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray)": "Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray)", "Social Democratic Party Of India": "Social Democratic Party Of India", "Socialist Party (India)": "Socialist Party (India)", "Socialist Unity Centre Of India (COMMUNIST)": "Socialist Unity Centre Of India (COMMUNIST)", "Swabhimani Paksha": "Swabhimani Paksha", "Swarajya Nirman Sena": "Swarajya Nirman Sena", "Swarajya Rashtra Nirman Sena": "Swarajya Rashtra Nirman Sena", "Swarajya Sena (Maharashtra)": "Swarajya Sena (Maharashtra)", "Swarajya Shakti Sena": "Swarajya Shakti Sena", "Swatantra Bharat Paksha": "Swatantra Bharat Paksha", "Tipu Sultan Party": "Tipu Sultan Party", "Uttar Bhartiya Vikas Sena": "Uttar Bhartiya Vikas Sena", "Vanchit Bahujan Aaghadi": "Vanchit Bahujan Aaghadi", "Veer Janshakti Party": "Veer Janshakti Party", "Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi": "Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi", "Vikas India Party": "Vikas India Party", "Yelgar Party": "Yelgar Party", "winner_votes": "winner_votes"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 288, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 288, "cast_gt_registered": 288, "registered_not_positive": 288}, "n_stations_flagged": 288, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:39.364272", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.381, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.281, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.281, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 288}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b67fd438be98402c9c7f6a89d8006f31", "name": "Australia 2024 local (overnight australia_act_2024_legislative_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.elections.act.gov.au/elections/previous-assembly-elections/2024-election/ballot-paper-preference-data", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ecode": "ecode", "ppn": "ppn", "ADAIR, Andrew Charles (FFP) [Kurrajong]": "ADAIR, Andrew Charles (FFP) [Kurrajong]", "AMOS, Greg (FFP) [Yerrabi]": "AMOS, Greg (FFP) [Yerrabi]", "BABY, Sunil (FFP) [Ginninderra]": "BABY, Sunil (FFP) [Ginninderra]", "BALLARD, Gareth (AJP) [Brindabella]": "BALLARD, Gareth (AJP) [Brindabella]", "BARNES, Lisa (FNP) [Yerrabi]": "BARNES, Lisa (FNP) [Yerrabi]", "BARR, Andrew (ALP) [Kurrajong]": "BARR, Andrew (ALP) [Kurrajong]", "BARRY, Chiaka (LIB) [Ginninderra]": "BARRY, Chiaka (LIB) [Ginninderra]", "BAVINTON, Tim (ALP) [Ginninderra]": "BAVINTON, Tim (ALP) [Ginninderra]", "BERRY, Yvette (ALP) [Ginninderra]": "BERRY, Yvette (ALP) [Ginninderra]", "BOLT, Kathleen (IFC) [Murrumbidgee]": "BOLT, Kathleen (IFC) [Murrumbidgee]", "BOUCKAERT, Ramon (LIB) [Kurrajong]": "BOUCKAERT, Ramon (LIB) [Kurrajong]", "BRADDOCK, Andrew (GREEN) [Yerrabi]": "BRADDOCK, Andrew (GREEN) [Yerrabi]", "BRAY, Ann (STR) [Kurrajong]": "BRAY, Ann (STR) [Kurrajong]", "BREWER, Michael (GREEN) [Murrumbidgee]": "BREWER, Michael (GREEN) [Murrumbidgee]", "BROOKMAN, Wendy (FNP) [Brindabella]": "BROOKMAN, Wendy (FNP) [Brindabella]", "BURKE, Gregory (BEL) [Yerrabi]": "BURKE, Gregory (BEL) [Yerrabi]", "CAIN, Peter (LIB) [Ginninderra]": "CAIN, Peter (LIB) [Ginninderra]", "CALATZIS, Efthimios (LIB) [Kurrajong]": "CALATZIS, Efthimios (LIB) [Kurrajong]", "CARRICK, Fiona (FCI) [Murrumbidgee]": "CARRICK, Fiona (FCI) [Murrumbidgee]", "CARTER, Sam (GREEN) [Murrumbidgee]": "CARTER, Sam (GREEN) [Murrumbidgee]", "CASTLEY, Leanne (LIB) [Yerrabi]": "CASTLEY, Leanne (LIB) [Yerrabi]", "CHEYNE, Tara (ALP) [Ginninderra]": "CHEYNE, Tara (ALP) [Ginninderra]", "CLAY, Jo (GREEN) [Ginninderra]": "CLAY, Jo (GREEN) [Ginninderra]", "COCKS, Ed (LIB) [Murrumbidgee]": "COCKS, Ed (LIB) [Murrumbidgee]", "CONNORS, Rhiannon (FNP) [Kurrajong]": "CONNORS, Rhiannon (FNP) [Kurrajong]", "CONNORS, Thaddeus (FNP) [Kurrajong]": "CONNORS, Thaddeus (FNP) [Kurrajong]", "CONSEN-LYNCH, Soelily (GREEN) [Yerrabi]": "CONSEN-LYNCH, Soelily (GREEN) [Yerrabi]", "COOPER, Douglas (DLP) [Ginninderra]": "COOPER, Douglas (DLP) [Ginninderra]", "COPP, Andrew (FFP) [Murrumbidgee]": "COPP, Andrew (FFP) [Murrumbidgee]", "COURT, Aggi (ALP) [Kurrajong]": "COURT, Aggi (ALP) [Kurrajong]", "CROSSMAN, Louise (ALP) [Brindabella]": "CROSSMAN, Louise (ALP) [Brindabella]", "CROWE, Helen (DLP) [Ginninderra]": "CROWE, Helen (DLP) [Ginninderra]", "CRUZ, James (GREEN) [Kurrajong]": "CRUZ, James (GREEN) [Kurrajong]", "CULLEN, Mignonne (UNG) [Ginninderra]": "CULLEN, Mignonne (UNG) [Ginninderra]", "DAMIANO, Marilena (UNG) [Kurrajong]": "DAMIANO, Marilena (UNG) [Kurrajong]", "DANIELS, James (LIB) [Brindabella]": "DANIELS, James (LIB) [Brindabella]", "DAVIDSON, Emma (GREEN) [Murrumbidgee]": "DAVIDSON, Emma (GREEN) [Murrumbidgee]", "DAWES, Anne-Louise (IFC) [Murrumbidgee]": "DAWES, Anne-Louise (IFC) [Murrumbidgee]", "DIAB, Rima (UNG) [Murrumbidgee]": "DIAB, Rima (UNG) [Murrumbidgee]", "DIMITROVA, Ralitsa (LIB) [Yerrabi]": "DIMITROVA, Ralitsa (LIB) [Yerrabi]", "DREW, Carolyne (AJP) [Ginninderra]": "DREW, Carolyne (AJP) [Ginninderra]", "DREW, Lara (AJP) [Ginninderra]": "DREW, Lara (AJP) [Ginninderra]", "DUNCAN, Michael (FNP) [Yerrabi]": "DUNCAN, Michael (FNP) [Yerrabi]", "EL-ASADI, Noor (ALP) [Murrumbidgee]": "EL-ASADI, Noor (ALP) [Murrumbidgee]", "EMERSON, Thomas (IFC) [Kurrajong]": "EMERSON, Thomas (IFC) [Kurrajong]", "EZEKIEL-HART, Emmanuel (UNG) [Brindabella]": "EZEKIEL-HART, Emmanuel (UNG) [Brindabella]", "FATSEAS, Marea (FCI) [Murrumbidgee]": "FATSEAS, Marea (FCI) [Murrumbidgee]", "FERNANDES, Riley (IFC) [Brindabella]": "FERNANDES, Riley (IFC) [Brindabella]", "FORDE, Brendan (ALP) [Brindabella]": "FORDE, Brendan (ALP) [Brindabella]", "FORESTI, Leanne (IFC) [Ginninderra]": "FORESTI, Leanne (IFC) [Ginninderra]", "GARTSHORE, Bruce (FFP) [Brindabella]": "GARTSHORE, Bruce (FFP) [Brindabella]", "GENTLEMAN, Mick (ALP) [Brindabella]": "GENTLEMAN, Mick (ALP) [Brindabella]", "GIAS, Alex (GREEN) [Yerrabi]": "GIAS, Alex (GREEN) [Yerrabi]", "GRAHAM, Merle (FFP) [Brindabella]": "GRAHAM, Merle (FFP) [Brindabella]", "GREENWOOD, Martin (ALP) [Kurrajong]": "GREENWOOD, Martin (ALP) [Kurrajong]", "GRIFFITHS, Gwenda (AJP) [Murrumbidgee]": "GRIFFITHS, Gwenda (AJP) [Murrumbidgee]", "GRIFFITHS-SMITH, Ashleigh (AJP) [Murrumbidgee]": "GRIFFITHS-SMITH, Ashleigh (AJP) [Murrumbidgee]", "HALEY, Belinda (DLP) [Kurrajong]": "HALEY, Belinda (DLP) [Kurrajong]", "HANNA, Michael (DLP) [Yerrabi]": "HANNA, Michael (DLP) [Yerrabi]", "HANSON, Jeremy (LIB) [Murrumbidgee]": "HANSON, Jeremy (LIB) [Murrumbidgee]", "HARBER, Rosa (LIB) [Brindabella]": "HARBER, Rosa (LIB) [Brindabella]", "HASKINS, Janine (UNG) [Ginninderra]": "HASKINS, Janine (UNG) [Ginninderra]", "HENTZSCHEL, Jenny (FFP) [Kurrajong]": "HENTZSCHEL, Jenny (FFP) [Kurrajong]", "HESLEHURST, Elyse (LIB) [Murrumbidgee]": "HESLEHURST, Elyse (LIB) [Murrumbidgee]", "HOUSE, Paul Girrawah (FNP) [Kurrajong]": "HOUSE, Paul Girrawah (FNP) [Kurrajong]", "HOWARD, Rick (DLP) [Ginninderra]": "HOWARD, Rick (DLP) [Ginninderra]", "HUNTER, Dani (GREEN) [Ginninderra]": "HUNTER, Dani (GREEN) [Ginninderra]", "HUSSAIN, Mohammad Munir (UNG) [Yerrabi]": "HUSSAIN, Mohammad Munir (UNG) [Yerrabi]", "JAKEMAN, Guy (LBP) [Ginninderra]": "JAKEMAN, Guy (LBP) [Ginninderra]", "JOHNSTON, Ben (IFC) [Kurrajong]": "JOHNSTON, Ben (IFC) [Kurrajong]", "JORY, Colin (DLP) [Yerrabi]": "JORY, Colin (DLP) [Yerrabi]", "KC, Sneha (IFC) [Yerrabi]": "KC, Sneha (IFC) [Yerrabi]", "KIKKERT, Elizabeth (FFP) [Ginninderra]": "KIKKERT, Elizabeth (FFP) [Ginninderra]", "KIVIMAKI, Henry (FFP) [Yerrabi]": "KIVIMAKI, Henry (FFP) [Yerrabi]", "KNIGHT, Robert (IFC) [Murrumbidgee]": "KNIGHT, Robert (IFC) [Murrumbidgee]", "KUDRYCZ, Walter (AJP) [Kurrajong]": "KUDRYCZ, Walter (AJP) [Kurrajong]", "KULKARNI, Vikram (IFC) [Yerrabi]": "KULKARNI, Vikram (IFC) [Yerrabi]", "LEE, Elizabeth (LIB) [Kurrajong]": "LEE, Elizabeth (LIB) [Kurrajong]", "LI, Fuxin (UNG) [Yerrabi]": "LI, Fuxin (UNG) [Yerrabi]", "LIERSCH, Tim (GREEN) [Ginninderra]": "LIERSCH, Tim (GREEN) [Ginninderra]", "LOUNT, Angela (BEL) [Ginninderra]": "LOUNT, Angela (BEL) [Ginninderra]", "LUSCOMBE, Sarah (LIB) [Kurrajong]": "LUSCOMBE, Sarah (LIB) [Kurrajong]", "MAYNE, Tenzin (IFC) [Kurrajong]": "MAYNE, Tenzin (IFC) [Kurrajong]", "MIKITA, John (LIB) [Yerrabi]": "MIKITA, John (LIB) [Yerrabi]", "MILLIGAN, James (LIB) [Yerrabi]": "MILLIGAN, James (LIB) [Yerrabi]", "MITRA, Sandi (LIB) [Brindabella]": "MITRA, Sandi (LIB) [Brindabella]", "MOGGRIDGE, Kye (FNP) [Yerrabi]": "MOGGRIDGE, Kye (FNP) [Yerrabi]", "MORRIS, Deborah (LIB) [Brindabella]": "MORRIS, Deborah (LIB) [Brindabella]", "MUDFORD, Isabel (GREEN) [Kurrajong]": "MUDFORD, Isabel (GREEN) [Kurrajong]", "McDOUGALL, Jack (FNP) [Brindabella]": "McDOUGALL, Jack (FNP) [Brindabella]", "McGRADY, Paula (IFC) [Murrumbidgee]": "McGRADY, Paula (IFC) [Murrumbidgee]", "McKINLEY, Joanne (UNG) [Yerrabi]": "McKINLEY, Joanne (UNG) [Yerrabi]", "McTAGGART, Teresa (AJP) [Kurrajong]": "McTAGGART, Teresa (AJP) [Kurrajong]", "NADIMPALLI, Krishna (LIB) [Yerrabi]": "NADIMPALLI, Krishna (LIB) [Yerrabi]", "NAICKER, Nathan (IFC) [Murrumbidgee]": "NAICKER, Nathan (IFC) [Murrumbidgee]", "NUCIFORA, Suzanne (IFC) [Ginninderra]": "NUCIFORA, Suzanne (IFC) [Ginninderra]", "NUGENT, Sam (GREEN) [Brindabella]": "NUGENT, Sam (GREEN) [Brindabella]", "NUTTALL, Laura (GREEN) [Brindabella]": "NUTTALL, Laura (GREEN) [Brindabella]", "ORR, Suzanne (ALP) [Yerrabi]": "ORR, Suzanne (ALP) [Yerrabi]", "PAINE, Bruce (FCI) [Murrumbidgee]": "PAINE, Bruce (FCI) [Murrumbidgee]", "PARTON, Mark (LIB) [Brindabella]": "PARTON, Mark (LIB) [Brindabella]", "PATERSON, Marisa (ALP) [Murrumbidgee]": "PATERSON, Marisa (ALP) [Murrumbidgee]", "PENTONY, Patrick (LIB) [Kurrajong]": "PENTONY, Patrick (LIB) [Kurrajong]", "PETTERSSON, Michael (ALP) [Yerrabi]": "PETTERSSON, Michael (ALP) [Yerrabi]", "PICKER, Vanessa (IFC) [Brindabella]": "PICKER, Vanessa (IFC) [Brindabella]", "PIKE, Cooper (FNP) [Yerrabi]": "PIKE, Cooper (FNP) [Yerrabi]", "PIKE, Harrison (FNP) [Kurrajong]": "PIKE, Harrison (FNP) [Kurrajong]", "POGUET, Sara (IFC) [Kurrajong]": "POGUET, Sara (IFC) [Kurrajong]", "POLLARD, David (IFC) [Yerrabi]": "POLLARD, David (IFC) [Yerrabi]", "POLLARD, Trent (IFC) [Yerrabi]": "POLLARD, Trent (IFC) [Yerrabi]", "POWELL, Tyson (FNP) [Yerrabi]": "POWELL, Tyson (FNP) [Yerrabi]", "PREVEDELLO, Joe (LIB) [Ginninderra]": "PREVEDELLO, Joe (LIB) [Ginninderra]", "PROWSE, Heidi (ALP) [Ginninderra]": "PROWSE, Heidi (ALP) [Ginninderra]", "RAJ, Mallika (ALP) [Yerrabi]": "RAJ, Mallika (ALP) [Yerrabi]", "RANGARAJAN, Harini (GREEN) [Murrumbidgee]": "RANGARAJAN, Harini (GREEN) [Murrumbidgee]", "RATTENBURY, Shane (GREEN) [Kurrajong]": "RATTENBURY, Shane (GREEN) [Kurrajong]", "READ, Sue (IFC) [Kurrajong]": "READ, Sue (IFC) [Kurrajong]", "REID, Jillian (GREEN) [Kurrajong]": "REID, Jillian (GREEN) [Kurrajong]", "RICHARDSON, Mark (IFC) [Ginninderra]": "RICHARDSON, Mark (IFC) [Ginninderra]", "ROBB, Dylan (FNP) [Brindabella]": "ROBB, Dylan (FNP) [Brindabella]", "ROBERTS, Darren (LIB) [Ginninderra]": "ROBERTS, Darren (LIB) [Ginninderra]", "SADIMOEN, Sean (ALP) [Ginninderra]": "SADIMOEN, Sean (ALP) [Ginninderra]", "SAHNI, Ravinder (ALP) [Yerrabi]": "SAHNI, Ravinder (ALP) [Yerrabi]", "SEARSON, Elise (IFC) [Brindabella]": "SEARSON, Elise (IFC) [Brindabella]", "SINCLAIR, Adele (GREEN) [Ginninderra]": "SINCLAIR, Adele (GREEN) [Ginninderra]", "SINGH, Amardeep (LIB) [Murrumbidgee]": "SINGH, Amardeep (LIB) [Murrumbidgee]", "SORNARAJ, Pradeep (ALP) [Yerrabi]": "SORNARAJ, Pradeep (ALP) [Yerrabi]", "SOXSMITH, Robyn (AJP) [Brindabella]": "SOXSMITH, Robyn (AJP) [Brindabella]", "SPENCER, Jessika (FNP) [Kurrajong]": "SPENCER, Jessika (FNP) [Kurrajong]", "SPENCER, Maxwell (DLP) [Ginninderra]": "SPENCER, Maxwell (DLP) [Ginninderra]", "STEEL, Chris (ALP) [Murrumbidgee]": "STEEL, Chris (ALP) [Murrumbidgee]", "STEFANIAK, Bill (BEL) [Ginninderra]": "STEFANIAK, Bill (BEL) [Ginninderra]", "STEPHEN-SMITH, Rachel (ALP) [Kurrajong]": "STEPHEN-SMITH, Rachel (ALP) [Kurrajong]", "STRONG, Peter (STR) [Kurrajong]": "STRONG, Peter (STR) [Kurrajong]", "SWAN, Troy (GREEN) [Brindabella]": "SWAN, Troy (GREEN) [Brindabella]", "TALEVSKI, Marina (ALP) [Kurrajong]": "TALEVSKI, Marina (ALP) [Kurrajong]", "TANG, Nelson (ALP) [Murrumbidgee]": "TANG, Nelson (ALP) [Murrumbidgee]", "TAYLOR, Jason (BEL) [Yerrabi]": "TAYLOR, Jason (BEL) [Yerrabi]", "TOUGH, Caitlin (ALP) [Brindabella]": "TOUGH, Caitlin (ALP) [Brindabella]", "TUTT, Alan (BEL) [Ginninderra]": "TUTT, Alan (BEL) [Ginninderra]", "VANDERBURGH, John (DLP) [Ginninderra]": "VANDERBURGH, John (DLP) [Ginninderra]", "VASSAROTTI, Rebecca (GREEN) [Kurrajong]": "VASSAROTTI, Rebecca (GREEN) [Kurrajong]", "VERRI, Andy (FFP) [Murrumbidgee]": "VERRI, Andy (FFP) [Murrumbidgee]", "VON BRASCH, Arved (LBP) [Ginninderra]": "VON BRASCH, Arved (LBP) [Ginninderra]", "WALLACE, Andrew (FFP) [Ginninderra]": "WALLACE, Andrew (FFP) [Ginninderra]", "WALSH, Karen (LIB) [Murrumbidgee]": "WALSH, Karen (LIB) [Murrumbidgee]", "WERNER-GIBBINGS, Taimus (ALP) [Brindabella]": "WERNER-GIBBINGS, Taimus (ALP) [Brindabella]", "WHITE, Boston (DLP) [Kurrajong]": "WHITE, Boston (DLP) [Kurrajong]", "WHITTY, Anna (ALP) [Murrumbidgee]": "WHITTY, Anna (ALP) [Murrumbidgee]"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 278, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 278, "registered_not_positive": 278, "cast_gt_registered": 278}, "n_stations_flagged": 278, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:36.892449", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.841, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.848, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.796, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.067, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.029, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.029, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 278}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5d5b44d96ffd4820bae9be0a3725a2fe", "name": "Canada 2023 local (overnight canada_pei_2023.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"district_number": "district_number", "votes_pc": "votes_pc", "votes_liberal": "votes_liberal", "votes_green": "votes_green", "votes_ndp": "votes_ndp", "votes_island_new": "votes_island_new", "votes_independent": "votes_independent"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 267, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 267, "registered_not_positive": 267, "votes_gt_valid": 267}, "n_stations_flagged": 267, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:34.364109", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.846, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.904, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.847, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.742, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.742, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.635, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.887, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 267}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fa88eb3f7aa3400d890c3842412985f6", "name": "India 2020 local (overnight india_bihar_2020_vidhansabha.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2020, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gitpranav87/Bihar_Legislative_Election_Results_2020_Data_Analysis/HEAD/10%20-%20Detailed%20Results.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"acno": "acno", "AAAAP": "AAAAP", "AAM": "AAM", "ABMVMP": "ABMVMP", "ACDP": "ACDP", "AHFBK": "AHFBK", "AIFB": "AIFB", "AIMEIEM": "AIMEIEM", "AIMF": "AIMF", "AIMIM": "AIMIM", "AJPR": "AJPR", "AJPS": "AJPS", "AKBHAD": "AKBHAD", "AKBMP": "AKBMP", "AKHDBRYVP": "AKHDBRYVP", "AKNDBHRJNP": "AKNDBHRJNP", "AMJNMTP": "AMJNMTP", "AMiP": "AMiP", "ANC": "ANC", "APADP": "APADP", "APKSP": "APKSP", "APoI": "APoI", "ASDHP": "ASDHP", "ASPKR": "ASPKR", "AZSP": "AZSP", "AngSP": "AngSP", "BAHUMP": "BAHUMP", "BAJVP": "BAJVP", "BBC": "BBC", "BBMP": "BBMP", "BDlP": "BDlP", "BGMP": "BGMP", "BHAIP": "BHAIP", "BHJJP": "BHJJP", "BHRTLKCHTP": "BHRTLKCHTP", "BHRTSBLP": "BHRTSBLP", "BHRTSYTKP": "BHRTSYTKP", "BHULKD": "BHULKD", "BIP": "BIP", "BJJD": "BJJD", "BJKD": "BJKD", "BJKVP": "BJKVP", "BJNJGD": "BJNJGD", "BJNP": "BJNP", "BJP": "BJP", "BKKMP": "BKKMP", "BKVP": "BKVP", "BLND": "BLND", "BLRP": "BLRP", "BMF": "BMF", "BMUP": "BMUP", "BNDl": "BNDl", "BPL": "BPL", "BRCTP": "BRCTP", "BRMNP": "BRMNP", "BRRTD": "BRRTD", "BRTYLKNYKP": "BRTYLKNYKP", "BSP": "BSP", "BSSPA": "BSSPA", "BTMSP": "BTMSP", "BVDU": "BVDU", "BYPP": "BYPP", "BaSaPa": "BaSaPa", "BhAmAP": "BhAmAP", "BhNP": "BhNP", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "CPIM": "CPIM", "FJKSP": "FJKSP", "GGP": "GGP", "GJKP": "GJKP", "GJNP": "GJNP", "HAMS": "HAMS", "HNDUAWMMNC": "HNDUAWMMNC", "HSAP": "HSAP", "HSP": "HSP", "HVD": "HVD", "INC": "INC", "IND": "IND", "INL": "INL", "JAC": "JAC", "JANADIP": "JANADIP", "JAPL": "JAPL", "JASP": "JASP", "JD(S)": "JD(S)", "JD(U)": "JD(U)", "JDR": "JDR", "JGHTP": "JGHTP", "JHP": "JHP", "JKM": "JKM", "JKiP": "JKiP", "JMBP": "JMBP", "JMM": "JMM", "JMVP": "JMVP", "JNSHKVPD": "JNSHKVPD", "JNSNGHDL": "JNSNGHDL", "JP": "JP", "JPJD": "JPJD", "JPS": "JPS", "JRJP": "JRJP", "JRVP": "JRVP", "JSVP": "JSVP", "JTLP": "JTLP", "JTVP": "JTVP", "JmtP": "JmtP", "KPOI": "KPOI", "KSLJNP": "KSLJNP", "LAJSP": "LAJSP", "LCD": "LCD", "LGJNPSCL": "LGJNPSCL", "LJD": "LJD", "LJP": "LJP", "LJVM": "LJVM", "LKSHPLK": "LKSHPLK", "LOKJANP": "LOKJANP", "LPSP": "LPSP", "LSD": "LSD", "LSMP": "LSMP", "LSSP": "LSSP", "LSWP": "LSWP", "MADP": "MADP", "MKDVP": "MKDVP", "MOSP": "MOSP", "MZEKP": "MZEKP", "ManJP": "ManJP", "NCP": "NCP", "NFDEP": "NFDEP", "NJANP": "NJANP", "NJP": "NJP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "NPEP": "NPEP", "NTP": "NTP", "PBI": "PBI", "PBLBRP": "PBLBRP", "PECP": "PECP", "PMP": "PMP", "PMPT": "PMPT", "PPID": "PPID", "PRAJAP": "PRAJAP", "PSS": "PSS", "RAUNTP": "RAUNTP", "RDU": "RDU", "RGPP": "RGPP", "RJANSWP": "RJANSWP", "RJBP": "RJBP", "RJCHD": "RJCHD", "RJD": "RJD", "RJJM": "RJJM", "RJKPS": "RJKPS", "RJPD": "RJPD", "RJPty": "RJPty", "RJSPS": "RJSPS", "RJnJnP": "RJnJnP", "RLSP": "RLSP", "RMGP": "RMGP", "RPI": "RPI", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "RPIRASH": "RPIRASH", "RPPRINAT": "RPPRINAT", "RSMD": "RSMD", "RSPS": "RSPS", "RSSCMJP": "RSSCMJP", "RSTJLKPS": "RSTJLKPS", "RSTJNVKSP": "RSTJNVKSP", "RSTSAHP": "RSTSAHP", "RSTSWNTP": "RSTSWNTP", "RSTWDMNRTP": "RSTWDMNRTP", "RSWD": "RSWD", "RTJHPR": "RTJHPR", "RTJPS": "RTJPS", "RTMNSWP": "RTMNSWP", "RTORP": "RTORP", "RTPP": "RTPP", "RTSHD": "RTSHD", "RTSMJD": "RTSMJD", "RUC": "RUC", "RVNP": "RVNP", "RWJS": "RWJS", "RaJPa": "RaJPa", "SAAFP": "SAAFP", "SAMDAL": "SAMDAL", "SANKISVP": "SANKISVP", "SANVP": "SANVP", "SAP": "SAP", "SBSP": "SBSP", "SBSPSP": "SBSPSP", "SDPI": "SDPI", "SHD": "SHD", "SHS": "SHS", "SHtP": "SHtP", "SJDD": "SJDD", "SJPB": "SJPB", "SP(I)": "SP(I)", "SPAKP": "SPAKP", "SPL": "SPL", "SRSMJNP": "SRSMJNP", "SSD": "SSD", "SUCI": "SUCI", "SWAP": "SWAP", "SWARAJ": "SWARAJ", "SWSP": "SWSP", "SaBP": "SaBP", "SatBP": "SatBP", "TPLRSP": "TPLRSP", "VBA": "VBA", "VCSMP": "VCSMP", "VPI": "VPI", "VSIP": "VSIP", "WAP": "WAP", "YBS": "YBS", "YGKRTDL": "YGKRTDL", "YKP": "YKP", "mimm": "mimm", "pms": "pms"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 243, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 243, "registered_not_positive": 243, "cast_gt_registered": 243}, "n_stations_flagged": 243, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:32.368750", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.39, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.292, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.209, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.304, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.39, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.39, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.292, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.221, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.221, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.753, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.753, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.663, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.663, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.449, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 243}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "da6dde6cb93a47a893ea242ba44eabef", "name": "India 2021 local (overnight india_tamil_nadu_2021.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/tecoholic/Election2021/tree/main/may2021/TN", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AC_NO": "AC_NO", "ABHM": "ABHM", "ADK": "ADK", "AIADMK": "AIADMK", "AIJMK": "AIJMK", "AIJMK(D_I": "AIJMK(D_I", "AIMM": "AIMM", "AIMMMK": "AIMMMK", "AIPMK": "AIPMK", "AISMK": "AISMK", "AITC": "AITC", "AIUUK": "AIUUK", "AIVP": "AIVP", "AIYDP": "AIYDP", "AJPK": "AJPK", "AMAK": "AMAK", "AMDMK": "AMDMK", "AMMK": "AMMK", "AMPK": "AMPK", "API": "API", "APP": "APP", "APTADMK": "APTADMK", "ASMK": "ASMK", "ASP": "ASP", "AUTMK": "AUTMK", "BDP": "BDP", "BJP": "BJP", "BMFP": "BMFP", "BSP": "BSP", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI(M)": "CPI(M)", "CPI(M)(L)": "CPI(M)(L)", "DMDK": "DMDK", "DMK": "DMK", "DMMK": "DMMK", "DMSK": "DMSK", "DSMI": "DSMI", "ETMK": "ETMK", "GPI": "GPI", "HJP": "HJP", "IDMMK": "IDMMK", "IJK": "IJK", "IKK": "IKK", "IMK": "IMK", "INC": "INC", "IND": "IND", "IUML": "IUML", "JD(S)": "JD(S)", "JJ": "JJ", "KDC": "KDC", "KDMMK": "KDMMK", "LJSP": "LJSP", "MIP": "MIP", "MK": "MK", "MMK": "MMK", "MMMK": "MMMK", "MMP": "MMP", "MNK": "MNK", "MNM": "MNM", "MSK": "MSK", "MSKK": "MSKK", "MTMK": "MTMK", "MUK": "MUK", "NCP": "NCP", "NDPSI": "NDPSI", "NGPP": "NGPP", "NINIK": "NINIK", "NIP": "NIP", "NKMK": "NKMK", "NMK": "NMK", "NOTA": "NOTA", "NPP": "NPP", "NTK": "NTK", "PMK": "PMK", "PPI": "PPI", "PT": "PT", "RJD": "RJD", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "RPI(S)": "RPI(S)", "RSP": "RSP", "RUC": "RUC", "SDPOI": "SDPOI", "SIFB": "SIFB", "SMNK": "SMNK", "SP": "SP", "SS": "SS", "SUCOI(C)": "SUCOI(C)", "TMC": "TMC", "TMGMK": "TMGMK", "TMMK": "TMMK", "TMNP": "TMNP", "TMTK": "TMTK", "TNIK": "TNIK", "TSP": "TSP", "TTNP": "TTNP", "UBM": "UBM", "UMK": "UMK", "USIP": "USIP", "VCK": "VCK", "VTK": "VTK", "VTVTK": "VTVTK", "VVP": "VVP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 234, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 234, "registered_not_positive": 234, "votes_gt_valid": 234}, "n_stations_flagged": 234, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:29.558114", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.398, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.307, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.398, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.398, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.307, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.307, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.234, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.234, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.687, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.466, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.466, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 234}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0a7bf8759d5b4ac7a5649889147ced88", "name": "India 2023 local (overnight india_madhya_pradesh_2023_vidhansabha.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.eci.gov.in/mp-legislative-election-2023-statistical-report", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ac_no": "ac_no", "AAAP": "AAAP", "ASPKR": "ASPKR", "BJP": "BJP", "BSCP": "BSCP", "BSP": "BSP", "GGP": "GGP", "INC": "INC", "JANADIP": "JANADIP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "OTHER": "OTHER", "SP": "SP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 230, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 230}, "n_stations_flagged": 230, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:27.574112", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.374, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.273, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.283, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.205, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.422, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 230}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6d39b0164e834810b3cf8a1dfdc9cdb6", "name": "Australia 2024 local (overnight australia_nt_2024_legislative_assembly_per_booth.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ntec.nt.gov.au/elections/past-elections/legislative-assembly/2024-territory-election/results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ALP_Labor": "ALP_Labor", "CLP_Country_Liberal": "CLP_Country_Liberal", "Greens": "Greens", "Independent": "Independent"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 225, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 225, "cast_gt_registered": 225}, "n_stations_flagged": 225, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:26.200598", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.841, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.848, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.796, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.067, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.029, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.029, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 225}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1e926ba6043c4143b517411881686e05", "name": "India 2023 local (overnight india_karnataka_2023_vidhan_sabha.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/thecont1/india-votes-data (data/json/2023Assembly-KA.json), generated directly from ECI results.eci.gov.in ResultAcGenMay2023 ConstituencywiseS101.htm?ac=N pages", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"constituency_no": "constituency_no", "n_candidates": "n_candidates", "inc": "inc", "bjp": "bjp", "jds": "jds", "aap": "aap", "bsp": "bsp", "ncp": "ncp", "krpp": "krpp", "upp": "upp", "skp": "skp", "sdpi": "sdpi", "krs": "krs", "nota": "nota", "other": "other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 224, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 224, "cast_gt_registered": 224, "votes_gt_valid": 224}, "n_stations_flagged": 224, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:24.772655", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.374, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.273, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.283, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.205, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.422, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 224}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7196b158e78e4d68a3a68d17fb2bb0d8", "name": "India 2023 local (overnight rajasthan_2023_vidhan_sabha.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ac_no": "ac_no", "p_Aam Aadmi Parivartan Party": "p_Aam Aadmi Parivartan Party", "p_Aam Aadmi Party": "p_Aam Aadmi Party", "p_Aam Janmat Party,": "p_Aam Janmat Party,", "p_Aazad Samaj Party (Kanshi Ram)": "p_Aazad Samaj Party (Kanshi Ram)", "p_Abhinav Loktantra Party": "p_Abhinav Loktantra Party", "p_Abhinav Rajasthan Party": "p_Abhinav Rajasthan Party", "p_Akhil Bharatiya Congress Dal (Ambedkar)": "p_Akhil Bharatiya Congress Dal (Ambedkar)", "p_Akhil Bhartiya Aamjan Party": "p_Akhil Bhartiya Aamjan Party", "p_All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen": "p_All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen", "p_Ambedkarite Party of India": "p_Ambedkarite Party of India", "p_Asankhya Samaj Party": "p_Asankhya Samaj Party", "p_Azad Samaj Party": "p_Azad Samaj Party", "p_Bahujan Mukti Party": "p_Bahujan Mukti Party", "p_Bahujan Samaj Party": "p_Bahujan Samaj Party", "p_Bahujan Shoshit Samaj Sangharsh Samta Party": "p_Bahujan Shoshit Samaj Sangharsh Samta Party", "p_Bharat Adivasi Party": "p_Bharat Adivasi Party", "p_Bharat Lok Sewak Party": "p_Bharat Lok Sewak Party", "p_Bharatiya Janata Party": "p_Bharatiya Janata Party", "p_Bharatiya Mulnivasi Aazad Party": "p_Bharatiya Mulnivasi Aazad Party", "p_Bharatiya Nav Kranti Party": "p_Bharatiya Nav Kranti Party", "p_Bharatiya Samta Samaj Party": "p_Bharatiya Samta Samaj Party", "p_Bharatiya Yuva Jan Ekta Party": "p_Bharatiya Yuva Jan Ekta Party", "p_Bhartiya Jan Satta Party": "p_Bhartiya Jan Satta Party", "p_Bhartiya Janraj Party": "p_Bhartiya Janraj Party", "p_Bhartiya Janta Dal": "p_Bhartiya Janta Dal", "p_Bhartiya Public Labour Party": "p_Bhartiya Public Labour Party", "p_Bhartiya Tribal Party": "p_Bhartiya Tribal Party", "p_Bheem Tribal Congress": "p_Bheem Tribal Congress", "p_Communist Party of India": "p_Communist Party of India", "p_Communist Party of India (Marxist)": "p_Communist Party of India (Marxist)", "p_Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) (Liberation)": "p_Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) (Liberation)", "p_Gana Suraksha Party": "p_Gana Suraksha Party", "p_Hindustan Janta Party": "p_Hindustan Janta Party", "p_Independent": "p_Independent", "p_Indian Indira Congress (R)": "p_Indian Indira Congress (R)", "p_Indian National Congress": "p_Indian National Congress", "p_Indian Peoples Green Party": "p_Indian Peoples Green Party", "p_Jai Hind Congress Party": "p_Jai Hind Congress Party", "p_Jai Maha Bharath Party": "p_Jai Maha Bharath Party", "p_Jan Sangh Party": "p_Jan Sangh Party", "p_Jan Sangharsh Virat Party": "p_Jan Sangharsh Virat Party", "p_Janata Congress": "p_Janata Congress", "p_Jannayak Janta Party": "p_Jannayak Janta Party", "p_Janta Sena Rajasthan": "p_Janta Sena Rajasthan", "p_Lok Janshakti Party(Ram Vilas)": "p_Lok Janshakti Party(Ram Vilas)", "p_Loktantrik Janshakti Party": "p_Loktantrik Janshakti Party", "p_Majdoor Kisan Akali Dal": "p_Majdoor Kisan Akali Dal", "p_Marxist Communist Party of India (United)": "p_Marxist Communist Party of India (United)", "p_NOTA": "p_NOTA", "p_National Future Party": "p_National Future Party", "p_National Janmandal Party": "p_National Janmandal Party", "p_Nav Hind Party": "p_Nav Hind Party", "p_Parivartan Party of India": "p_Parivartan Party of India", "p_Pehchan People\u2019s Party": "p_Pehchan People\u2019s Party", "p_Peoples Party of India (Democratic)": "p_Peoples Party of India (Democratic)", "p_People\u2019s Liberal Party": "p_People\u2019s Liberal Party", "p_Public Political Party": "p_Public Political Party", "p_Rajasthan Democratic Front": "p_Rajasthan Democratic Front", "p_Rajasthan Vikas Party": "p_Rajasthan Vikas Party", "p_Rashtra Bhakt Dal": "p_Rashtra Bhakt Dal", "p_Rashtravadi Bharat Party": "p_Rashtravadi Bharat Party", "p_Rashtriya Jan Shourya Party": "p_Rashtriya Jan Shourya Party", "p_Rashtriya Janata Sena": "p_Rashtriya Janata Sena", "p_Rashtriya Jankranti Party": "p_Rashtriya Jankranti Party", "p_Rashtriya Jatigat Aarakshan Virodhi Party": "p_Rashtriya Jatigat Aarakshan Virodhi Party", "p_Rashtriya Lok Dal": "p_Rashtriya Lok Dal", "p_Rashtriya Loktantrik Party": "p_Rashtriya Loktantrik Party", "p_Rashtriya Rashtrawadi Party": "p_Rashtriya Rashtrawadi Party", "p_Rashtriya Sawarn Dal": "p_Rashtriya Sawarn Dal", "p_Rashtriya Vyapari Party": "p_Rashtriya Vyapari Party", "p_Republican Party of India": "p_Republican Party of India", "p_Republican Party of India (Athawale)": "p_Republican Party of India (Athawale)", "p_Right to Recall Party": "p_Right to Recall Party", "p_Samajwadi Party": "p_Samajwadi Party", "p_Samrat Mihir Bhoj Samaj Party": "p_Samrat Mihir Bhoj Samaj Party", "p_Shiv Sena": "p_Shiv Sena", "p_Social Democratic Party Of India": "p_Social Democratic Party Of India", "p_Swatantrata Abhivyakti Party": "p_Swatantrata Abhivyakti Party", "p_Ummeed Party of India": "p_Ummeed Party of India", "p_Vikas Manch": "p_Vikas Manch", "p_Welfare Party Of India": "p_Welfare Party Of India"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 199, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 199, "cast_gt_registered": 199, "registered_not_positive": 199}, "n_stations_flagged": 199, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:23.051697", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.374, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.273, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.283, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.205, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.422, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 199}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b60057be023d493596a0215879ca7402", "name": "India 2022 local (overnight gujarat_2022_vidhan_sabha.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/makenajay/Gujarat_2022_Election/HEAD/TCPD_AE_Gujarat_2022-12-19.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"constituency_no": "constituency_no", "turnout_pct": "turnout_pct", "AAAP": "AAAP", "AIMIM": "AIMIM", "Aadi_Bharat_Party": "Aadi_Bharat_Party", "Akhil_Bharat_Hindu_Mahasabha": "Akhil_Bharat_Hindu_Mahasabha", "All_India_Hindustan_Congress_Party": "All_India_Hindustan_Congress_Party", "Apni_Janta_Party": "Apni_Janta_Party", "BJP": "BJP", "BSP": "BSP", "Bahujan_RepublicanSocialist_Party": "Bahujan_RepublicanSocialist_Party", "Bahujan_Suraksha_Dal": "Bahujan_Suraksha_Dal", "Bharatiya_Bahujan_Congress": "Bharatiya_Bahujan_Congress", "Bharatiya_Hitrakshak_Party": "Bharatiya_Hitrakshak_Party", "Bharatiya_National_Janta_Dal": "Bharatiya_National_Janta_Dal", "Bharatiya_Rashtravadi_Paksha": "Bharatiya_Rashtravadi_Paksha", "Bharatiya_Republican_Paksha": "Bharatiya_Republican_Paksha", "Bharatiya_Yuva_Jan_Ekta_Party": "Bharatiya_Yuva_Jan_Ekta_Party", "Bhartiya_Jan_Parishad": "Bhartiya_Jan_Parishad", "Bhartiya_Nagrik_Suraksha_Party": "Bhartiya_Nagrik_Suraksha_Party", "Bhartiya_Tribal_Party": "Bhartiya_Tribal_Party", "CPI": "CPI", "Communist_Party_of_India(Marxist)": "Communist_Party_of_India(Marxist)", "Communist_Party_of_India(Marxist-Leninist)(Liberation)": "Communist_Party_of_India(Marxist-Leninist)(Liberation)", "Democratic_Bharatiya_Samaj_Party": "Democratic_Bharatiya_Samaj_Party", "Dhanwan_Bharat_Party": "Dhanwan_Bharat_Party", "Gana_Suraksha_Party": "Gana_Suraksha_Party", "Garvi_Gujarat_Party": "Garvi_Gujarat_Party", "Gujarat_Nav_Nirman_Sena": "Gujarat_Nav_Nirman_Sena", "Gujarat_Sarva_Samaj_Party": "Gujarat_Sarva_Samaj_Party", "Gunj_Satya_Ni_Janata_Party": "Gunj_Satya_Ni_Janata_Party", "INC": "INC", "IND": "IND", "Insaniyat_Party": "Insaniyat_Party", "Jan_Man_Party": "Jan_Man_Party", "Jan_Sangh_Party": "Jan_Sangh_Party", "Jan_Sangharsh_Virat_Party": "Jan_Sangharsh_Virat_Party", "Jan_Sewa_Driver_Party": "Jan_Sewa_Driver_Party", "Janata_Dal(Secular)": "Janata_Dal(Secular)", "Janata_Dal(United)": "Janata_Dal(United)", "Log_Party": "Log_Party", "Lok_Janshakti_Party(Ram_Vilas)": "Lok_Janshakti_Party(Ram_Vilas)", "Loktantrik_Rashrtavadi_Party": "Loktantrik_Rashrtavadi_Party", "Loktantrik_Samajwadi_Party": "Loktantrik_Samajwadi_Party", "NCP": "NCP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "National_Maha_Sabha_Party": "National_Maha_Sabha_Party", "National_Youth_Party": "National_Youth_Party", "New_India_United_Party": "New_India_United_Party", "Nirbhay_Bharteey_Party": "Nirbhay_Bharteey_Party", "Pachchasi_Parivartan_Samaj_Party": "Pachchasi_Parivartan_Samaj_Party", "Praja_Vijay_Paksh": "Praja_Vijay_Paksh", "RSPS": "RSPS", "Rashtra_Mangal_Mission_Party": "Rashtra_Mangal_Mission_Party", "Rashtra_Nirman_Party": "Rashtra_Nirman_Party", "Rashtrawadi_Janlok_Dal": "Rashtrawadi_Janlok_Dal", "Rashtriya_Hind_Ekta_Dal": "Rashtriya_Hind_Ekta_Dal", "Rashtriya_Jankranti_Party": "Rashtriya_Jankranti_Party", "Rashtriya_Power_Party": "Rashtriya_Power_Party", "Rashtriya_Samaj_Dal_(R)": "Rashtriya_Samaj_Dal_(R)", "Real_Democracy_Party": "Real_Democracy_Party", "Right_to_Recall_Party": "Right_to_Recall_Party", "SDPI": "SDPI", "SP": "SP", "SUCI": "SUCI", "Sainik_Samaj_Party": "Sainik_Samaj_Party", "Sanyukt_Vikas_Party": "Sanyukt_Vikas_Party", "Sardar_Vallabhbhai_Patel_Party": "Sardar_Vallabhbhai_Patel_Party", "Sarvodaya_Bharat_Party": "Sarvodaya_Bharat_Party", "Satyawadi_Rakshak_Party": "Satyawadi_Rakshak_Party", "Saurashtra_Janta_Paksha": "Saurashtra_Janta_Paksha", "Swatantrata_Abhivyakti_Party": "Swatantrata_Abhivyakti_Party", "Vikas_India_Party": "Vikas_India_Party", "Vyavastha_Parivartan_Party": "Vyavastha_Parivartan_Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 182, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 182}, "n_stations_flagged": 182, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:21.117350", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.384, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.291, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.384, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.384, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.291, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.291, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.553, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.764, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.442, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 182}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ecb75d7a4297426196a23061fc7d9540", "name": "India 2024 local (overnight india_andhra_pradesh_2024_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data-analytics.github.io/Election_Data_2024/Andhra_Pradesh.html (andhrapradesh_counting.csv); compiled from ECI results.eci.gov.in 2024", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_ABJS": "votes_ABJS", "votes_AIFB": "votes_AIFB", "votes_ANC": "votes_ANC", "votes_ARPS": "votes_ARPS", "votes_AYSRCP": "votes_AYSRCP", "votes_BADP": "votes_BADP", "votes_BJP": "votes_BJP", "votes_BSP": "votes_BSP", "votes_CPI": "votes_CPI", "votes_CPI_M": "votes_CPI_M", "votes_CPI_M_L": "votes_CPI_M_L", "votes_DBP": "votes_DBP", "votes_INC": "votes_INC", "votes_IND": "votes_IND", "votes_IPBP": "votes_IPBP", "votes_IUML": "votes_IUML", "votes_JP": "votes_JP", "votes_MCPI": "votes_MCPI", "votes_NOTA": "votes_NOTA", "votes_Others": "votes_Others", "votes_PJD": "votes_PJD", "votes_PPI": "votes_PPI", "votes_PRSP": "votes_PRSP", "votes_RJD": "votes_RJD", "votes_RPI": "votes_RPI", "votes_RPI_A": "votes_RPI_A", "votes_RPI_K": "votes_RPI_K", "votes_RSP": "votes_RSP", "votes_SP": "votes_SP", "votes_SUCI": "votes_SUCI", "votes_TDP": "votes_TDP", "votes_VCK": "votes_VCK", "votes_YSRCP": "votes_YSRCP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 175, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 175, "cast_gt_registered": 175, "registered_not_positive": 175}, "n_stations_flagged": 175, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:19.477581", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.381, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.281, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.281, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 175}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4c4df596af0b423b959ae162c4f2794a", "name": "India 2021 local (overnight india_kerala_2021_assembly.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/tecoholic/Election2021/tree/master/may2021/KL", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ac_no": "ac_no", "Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha": "Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha", "All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam": "All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "Ambedkarite Party of India": "Ambedkarite Party of India", "Anna Democratic Human Rights Movement Party of India": "Anna Democratic Human Rights Movement Party of India", "Bahujan Dravida Party": "Bahujan Dravida Party", "Bahujan Samaj Party": "Bahujan Samaj Party", "Bharath Dharma Jana Sena": "Bharath Dharma Jana Sena", "Bharatiya Janata Party": "Bharatiya Janata Party", "Communist Marxist Party Kerala State Committee": "Communist Marxist Party Kerala State Committee", "Communist Party of India": "Communist Party of India", "Communist Party of India (Marxist)": "Communist Party of India (Marxist)", "Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) Red Star": "Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) Red Star", "Congress (Secular)": "Congress (Secular)", "Democratic Human Rights Movement Party": "Democratic Human Rights Movement Party", "Democratic Social Justice Party": "Democratic Social Justice Party", "Independent": "Independent", "Indian Christian Secular Party": "Indian Christian Secular Party", "Indian Gandhiyan Party": "Indian Gandhiyan Party", "Indian National Congress": "Indian National Congress", "Indian National League": "Indian National League", "Indian Union Muslim League": "Indian Union Muslim League", "Janadhipathiya Kerala Congress": "Janadhipathiya Kerala Congress", "Janata Dal (Secular)": "Janata Dal (Secular)", "Janata Dal (United)": "Janata Dal (United)", "Kerala Congress": "Kerala Congress", "Kerala Congress (B)": "Kerala Congress (B)", "Kerala Congress (Jacob)": "Kerala Congress (Jacob)", "Kerala Congress (M)": "Kerala Congress (M)", "Kerala Janapaksham (Secular),": "Kerala Janapaksham (Secular),", "Kerala Janatha Party": "Kerala Janatha Party", "Loktantrik Janta Dal": "Loktantrik Janta Dal", "Marxist Communist Party of India (United)": "Marxist Communist Party of India (United)", "National Labour Party": "National Labour Party", "National Secular Conference": "National Secular Conference", "Nationalist Congress Party": "Nationalist Congress Party", "New Labour Party": "New Labour Party", "None of the Above": "None of the Above", "Rashtriya Janata Dal": "Rashtriya Janata Dal", "Republican Party of India (A)": "Republican Party of India (A)", "Revolutionary Marxist Party of India": "Revolutionary Marxist Party of India", "Revolutionary Socialist Party": "Revolutionary Socialist Party", "SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF INDIA": "SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF INDIA", "SOCIALIST UNITY CENTRE OF INDIA (COMMUNIST)": "SOCIALIST UNITY CENTRE OF INDIA (COMMUNIST)", "Samajwadi Forward Bloc": "Samajwadi Forward Bloc", "Samajwadi Jan Parishad": "Samajwadi Jan Parishad", "Secular Democratic Congress": "Secular Democratic Congress", "Shiv Sena": "Shiv Sena", "Swaraj India": "Swaraj India", "Twenty 20 Party": "Twenty 20 Party", "Welfare Party Of India": "Welfare Party Of India"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 140, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 140, "cast_gt_registered": 140, "votes_gt_valid": 140}, "n_stations_flagged": 140, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:17.788538", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.398, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.307, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.398, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.398, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.307, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.307, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.234, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.234, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.687, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.466, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.466, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 140}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2ecda6b9cb294935941b911b622dd838", "name": "Colombia 1974 parliamentary (overnight colombia_1974_1990_camara_per_district.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 1974, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/CPV705", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"magnitude": "magnitude", "n_lists": "n_lists", "invalid_blank": "invalid_blank", "invalid_null": "invalid_null", "party_00_Otros": "party_00_Otros", "party_01_Liberales": "party_01_Liberales", "party_02_Conservadores": "party_02_Conservadores", "party_03_ANAPO": "party_03_ANAPO", "party_04_UNO": "party_04_UNO", "party_05_SDC": "party_05_SDC", "party_06_FUP": "party_06_FUP", "party_07_FD": "party_07_FD", "party_08_MUM": "party_08_MUM", "party_09_Coalicion": "party_09_Coalicion", "party_10_MID": "party_10_MID", "party_11_UP": "party_11_UP", "party_12_MNC": "party_12_MNC", "party_13_NLFD": "party_13_NLFD", "party_14_Nuevo_Liberalismo": "party_14_Nuevo_Liberalismo"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 130, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 130, "cast_gt_registered": 130, "votes_gt_valid": 130}, "n_stations_flagged": 130, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:16.288838", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.426, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.409, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.411, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.277, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.426, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.409, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.531, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.393, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.348, "year": 1974, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.215, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 1974, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.239, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.56, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 1974, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.411, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.411, "year": 1974, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.277, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.277, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.144, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.144, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.517, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.574, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.485, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.632, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "PLC", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Conservative", "margin": 25.61, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "COL", "year": 1974, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 130}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "36fef42aab9d46509bd0431e157c6ea4", "name": "Germany 2022 local (overnight germany_nrw_2022_landtag_wahlkreis.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.wahlergebnisse.nrw/landtagswahlen/2022/LW22_WK_insgesamt.txt", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CDU": "CDU", "SPD": "SPD", "FDP": "FDP", "AfD": "AfD", "GR\u00dcNE": "GR\u00dcNE", "DIE_LINKE": "DIE_LINKE", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "Die_PARTEI": "Die_PARTEI", "FREIE_W\u00c4HLER": "FREIE_W\u00c4HLER", "BIG": "BIG", "\u00d6DP": "\u00d6DP", "Volksabstimmung": "Volksabstimmung", "MLPD": "MLPD", "DIE_VIOLETTEN": "DIE_VIOLETTEN", "Gesundheitsforschung": "Gesundheitsforschung", "ZENTRUM": "ZENTRUM", "DKP": "DKP", "dieBasis": "dieBasis", "DSP": "DSP", "Die_Urbane": "Die_Urbane", "LIEBE": "LIEBE", "FAMILIE": "FAMILIE", "neo": "neo", "Die_Humanisten": "Die_Humanisten", "PdF": "PdF", "LfK": "LfK", "Tierschutzpartei": "Tierschutzpartei", "Team_Todenh\u00f6fer": "Team_Todenh\u00f6fer", "Volt": "Volt"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 128, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:15.202382", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.855, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.806, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.018, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 128}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7de62ea04b6547af9033ddfbbc56585f", "name": "India 2021 local (overnight india_assam_2021_vidhan_sabha.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/tecoholic/Election2021 (may2021/AS/all_candidate.csv)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AC_NO": "AC_NO", "AGP": "AGP", "AITC": "AITC", "AIUDF": "AIUDF", "AJP": "AJP", "BJP": "BJP", "BPF": "BPF", "CPI": "CPI", "CPIML": "CPIML", "CPM": "CPM", "INC": "INC", "NOTA": "NOTA", "NPP": "NPP", "OTHER": "OTHER", "SUCI_C": "SUCI_C", "UPPL": "UPPL"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 126, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 126, "registered_not_positive": 126, "cast_gt_registered": 126}, "n_stations_flagged": 126, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:14.085985", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.398, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.307, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.398, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.398, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.307, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.307, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.234, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.234, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.687, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.466, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.466, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 126}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cb014f8747f2497a826c0ee3c7ec41a4", "name": "India 2023 local (overnight india_telangana_2023_vidhansabha.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.opencity.in/dataset/62ad1510-22c4-4f9f-a22c-aa5391ec89b6/resource/3632e39e-63c6-4d2f-b240-5decb915f4d0/download/detailed_results.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ac": "ac", "ABDP": "ABDP", "AIBPSP": "AIBPSP", "AIFB": "AIFB", "AIMEIEM": "AIMEIEM", "AIMEP": "AIMEP", "AIMIM": "AIMIM", "AINHCP": "AINHCP", "AINSMP": "AINSMP", "AODRP": "AODRP", "ASPKR": "ASPKR", "AYSRCP": "AYSRCP", "BAHUBP": "BAHUBP", "BALP": "BALP", "BARESP": "BARESP", "BCUF": "BCUF", "BCYP": "BCYP", "BHOP": "BHOP", "BHRS": "BHRS", "BHRTSMJDLP": "BHRTSMJDLP", "BHRTSWDCNG": "BHRTSWDCNG", "BJP": "BJP", "BKSP": "BKSP", "BLFP": "BLFP", "BLIP": "BLIP", "BMUP": "BMUP", "BRS": "BRS", "BSP": "BSP", "BUJNBHRTP": "BUJNBHRTP", "CPI": "CPI", "CPI(M)": "CPI(M)", "CPI(ML)(L)": "CPI(ML)(L)", "CPIM": "CPIM", "DABAP": "DABAP", "DHRMSMJP": "DHRMSMJP", "DJHP": "DJHP", "DJMK": "DJMK", "GGP": "GGP", "GNASURKP": "GNASURKP", "GNDWDKP": "GNDWDKP", "IBP": "IBP", "INC": "INC", "IND": "IND", "INDPJC": "INDPJC", "INJSP": "INJSP", "IPBP": "IPBP", "JAC": "JAC", "JASWP": "JASWP", "JJSP": "JJSP", "JMBP": "JMBP", "JNRJP": "JNRJP", "JSKHP": "JSKHP", "JnP": "JnP", "LJD": "LJD", "MBT": "MBT", "MCPI": "MCPI", "MTRSP": "MTRSP", "NIP": "NIP", "NJANP": "NJANP", "NNKP": "NNKP", "NOTA": "NOTA", "NRCP": "NRCP", "PEOPRTCP": "PEOPRTCP", "PEP": "PEP", "PGSP": "PGSP", "PPID": "PPID", "PPOI": "PPOI", "PRCP": "PRCP", "PRJSNP": "PRJSNP", "PRJVLGUP": "PRJVLGUP", "PRJVNIP": "PRJVNIP", "PRSHP": "PRSHP", "PS": "PS", "RCPI(R)": "RCPI(R)", "RDHP": "RDHP", "RJ": "RJ", "RPC(S)": "RPC(S)", "RPI": "RPI", "RPI(A)": "RPI(A)", "RPPRINAT": "RPPRINAT", "RSHTSMNYPP": "RSHTSMNYPP", "RSPS": "RSPS", "RaJPa": "RaJPa", "SHP": "SHP", "SJPI": "SJPI", "SKJLP": "SKJLP", "SP(I)": "SP(I)", "SUCI": "SUCI", "TDDP": "TDDP", "TECPI": "TECPI", "TJP": "TJP", "TLGNARJYS": "TLGNARJYS", "TPJRP": "TPJRP", "TPSP": "TPSP", "TRP": "TRP", "TRPS": "TRPS", "TSP": "TSP", "URTP": "URTP", "VSWABHRTP": "VSWABHRTP", "VTRP": "VTRP", "YGATLSIP": "YGATLSIP", "YVTRP": "YVTRP", "mmsp": "mmsp", "rpsn": "rpsn", "sps": "sps", "telp": "telp"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 119, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 119}, "n_stations_flagged": 119, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:13.128003", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.374, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.273, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.283, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.205, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.422, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 119}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ea67685efc594b63a589297e0c804c9a", "name": "India 2024 local (overnight india_haryana_2024_vidhan_sabha.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/thecont1/india-votes-data (data/csv/2024Assembly-HR.csv) \u2014 scraped from results.eci.gov.in ResultAcGenOct2024 (ECI official)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"constituency_no": "constituency_no", "Aam Aadmi Party": "Aam Aadmi Party", "Bahujan Samaj Party": "Bahujan Samaj Party", "Bharatiya Janata Party": "Bharatiya Janata Party", "Communist Party of India (Marxist)": "Communist Party of India (Marxist)", "Haryana Jan Sevak Party": "Haryana Jan Sevak Party", "Haryana Lokhit Party": "Haryana Lokhit Party", "Independent": "Independent", "Indian National Congress": "Indian National Congress", "Indian National Lok Dal": "Indian National Lok Dal", "Jannayak Janta Party": "Jannayak Janta Party", "None of the Above": "None of the Above", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 90, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 90, "registered_not_positive": 90, "cast_gt_registered": 90}, "n_stations_flagged": 90, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:11.877669", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.381, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.281, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.281, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 90}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "102737160420435ca2e4fc3e37c5f08a", "name": "India 2024 local (overnight india_jammu_kashmir_2024_vidhansabha.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.eci.gov.in/AcResultGenOct2024/ (per-AC ConstituencywiseU08{N}.htm); mirror github.com/thecont1/india-votes-data data/json/2024Assembly-JK.json (generated directly from ECI)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"constituency_no": "constituency_no", "n_candidates": "n_candidates", "Aam Aadmi Party": "Aam Aadmi Party", "Aazad Samaj Party (Kanshi Ram)": "Aazad Samaj Party (Kanshi Ram)", "All India Forward Bloc": "All India Forward Bloc", "All Jammu and Kashmir Liberal Democratic Party": "All Jammu and Kashmir Liberal Democratic Party", "Aman Aur Shanti Tehreek-E-Jammu and Kashmir": "Aman Aur Shanti Tehreek-E-Jammu and Kashmir", "Anarakshit Samaj Party": "Anarakshit Samaj Party", "Azad Samaj Party": "Azad Samaj Party", "Bahujan Samaj Party": "Bahujan Samaj Party", "Bharat Jodo Party": "Bharat Jodo Party", "Bharatiya Janata Party": "Bharatiya Janata Party", "Bharatiya Sampuran Krantikari Party": "Bharatiya Sampuran Krantikari Party", "Bhim Sena": "Bhim Sena", "Communist Party of India (Marxist)": "Communist Party of India (Marxist)", "Democratic Progressive Azad Party": "Democratic Progressive Azad Party", "Garib Democratic Party": "Garib Democratic Party", "Haq Insaaf Party": "Haq Insaaf Party", "Hindustan Shakti Sena": "Hindustan Shakti Sena", "Independent": "Independent", "Indian National Congress": "Indian National Congress", "Jammu And Kashmir Peoples Democratic Front (Secular)": "Jammu And Kashmir Peoples Democratic Front (Secular)", "Jammu and Kashmir All Alliance Democratic Party": "Jammu and Kashmir All Alliance Democratic Party", "Jammu and Kashmir Apni Party": "Jammu and Kashmir Apni Party", "Jammu and Kashmir Awami National Conference": "Jammu and Kashmir Awami National Conference", "Jammu and Kashmir National Conference": "Jammu and Kashmir National Conference", "Jammu and Kashmir National Panthers Party (Bhim)": "Jammu and Kashmir National Panthers Party (Bhim)", "Jammu and Kashmir Nationalist People's Front": "Jammu and Kashmir Nationalist People's Front", "Jammu and Kashmir People Conference": "Jammu and Kashmir People Conference", "Jammu and Kashmir Peoples Democratic Party": "Jammu and Kashmir Peoples Democratic Party", "Janata Dal (United)": "Janata Dal (United)", "JandK National Panthers Party (India)": "JandK National Panthers Party (India)", "Liberal Democratic Party": "Liberal Democratic Party", "National Awami United Party": "National Awami United Party", "National Democratic Party (Indian)": "National Democratic Party (Indian)", "National Loktantrik Party": "National Loktantrik Party", "National Republic Party Of India": "National Republic Party Of India", "National Youth Party": "National Youth Party", "Nationalist Congress Party": "Nationalist Congress Party", "None of the Above": "None of the Above", "Peoples Democratic Party": "Peoples Democratic Party", "Rashtriya Lok Dal": "Rashtriya Lok Dal", "Rashtriya Lok Janshakti Party": "Rashtriya Lok Janshakti Party", "Republican Party of India (A)": "Republican Party of India (A)", "Republican Party of India (Athawale)": "Republican Party of India (Athawale)", "Sainik Samaj Party": "Sainik Samaj Party", "Samajwadi Party": "Samajwadi Party", "Sampoorna Bharat Kranti Party": "Sampoorna Bharat Kranti Party", "Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray)": "Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray)", "ShivSena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray)": "ShivSena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 90, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 90, "registered_not_positive": 90, "cast_gt_registered": 90}, "n_stations_flagged": 90, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:10.985871", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.381, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.281, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.281, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 90}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "53ba56849bb64a55a8675b174536c41d", "name": "Spain 2023 local (overnight spain_canarias_2023_parlamento_municipio.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.parcan.es/elecciones/2023/municipios/ (Parlamento de Canarias official per-municipio results; per page /municipios/{ine5}/isla/{1-7}/)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votos_partidos": "votos_partidos", "PP": "PP", "PSOE": "PSOE", "NC-BC": "NC-BC", "USP": "USP", "DVC": "DVC", "VOX": "VOX", "CCA": "CCA", "UXGC": "UXGC", "PACMA": "PACMA", "P_N_C_": "P_N_C_", "3E": "3E", "HABLEMOS_AHORA": "HABLEMOS_AHORA", "REUNIR_CANARIAS_SOSTENIBLE": "REUNIR_CANARIAS_SOSTENIBLE", "AHORA_CANARIAS-PCPC": "AHORA_CANARIAS-PCPC", "CS": "CS", "CONTIGO": "CONTIGO", "AMF": "AMF", "+C": "+C", "UDC": "UDC", "ASG": "ASG", "IXLG": "IXLG", "MAE": "MAE", "A_H_I_": "A_H_I_", "ASAMBLEA_HERRE\u00d1A": "ASAMBLEA_HERRE\u00d1A"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 88, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 88}, "n_stations_flagged": 88, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:09.751214", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.831, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.269, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.759, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.269, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.067, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.067, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 88}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6d6db10fea3847beb254a979ad14aa18", "name": "Germany 2022 local (overnight germany_lower_saxony_2022_landtag.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://wahlen.statistik.niedersachsen.de/LW2022/wahlergebnis.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"valid_erststimmen": "valid_erststimmen", "SPD": "SPD", "CDU": "CDU", "GR\u00c3\u0153NE": "GR\u00c3\u0153NE", "FDP": "FDP", "AfD": "AfD", "DIE LINKE": "DIE LINKE", "dieBasis": "dieBasis", "B\u00c3\u00bcndnis C": "B\u00c3\u00bcndnis C", "DiB": "DiB", "ZENTRUM": "ZENTRUM", "Die Friesen": "Die Friesen", "HAIE": "HAIE", "sonstige (Partei)": "sonstige (Partei)", "FREIE W\u00c3\u201eHLER": "FREIE W\u00c3\u201eHLER", "\u00c3\u2013DP": "\u00c3\u2013DP", "Die Humanisten Niedersachsen": "Die Humanisten Niedersachsen", "Die PARTEI": "Die PARTEI", "Gesundheitsforschung": "Gesundheitsforschung", "Tierschutzpartei": "Tierschutzpartei", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "SGV": "SGV", "Team Todenh\u00c3\u00b6fer": "Team Todenh\u00c3\u00b6fer", "Volt": "Volt"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 87, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 87}, "n_stations_flagged": 87, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:08.792077", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.855, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.806, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.018, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 87}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0edf11de7e1844c6abc5d8483ec59cef", "name": "Spain 2023 local (overnight spain_asturias_2023_junta_general_municipio.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.sadei.es/sadei/pxweb/es/01/19__04/ (tables 190426 Votos a candidaturas + 190402 Censo y participacion, ano 2023)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"is_cera": "is_cera", "PSOE": "PSOE", "PP": "PP", "VOX": "VOX", "IU-MAS_PAIS-IAS": "IU-MAS_PAIS-IAS", "PODEMOS_ASTURIES": "PODEMOS_ASTURIES", "FORO": "FORO", "Cs": "Cs", "PACMA": "PACMA", "SOS_ASTURIAS": "SOS_ASTURIAS", "SOS_OCCIDENTE": "SOS_OCCIDENTE", "V-Q": "V-Q", "PCTE": "PCTE", "ANDECHA": "ANDECHA", "SMP": "SMP", "PUM+J": "PUM+J", "PUEDE": "PUEDE"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 78, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 77}, "n_stations_flagged": 77, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:07.820595", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.831, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.269, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.759, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.269, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.067, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.067, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 78}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a129595b83cf47fe8be3f43716c101c3", "name": "India 2024 local (overnight jharkhand_2024_vidhan_sabha_constituency.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.eci.gov.in/ResultAcGenNov2024/ConstituencywiseS27{n}.htm (ECI official, mirrored at github.com/thecont1/india-votes-data data/csv/2024Assembly-JH.csv)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"constituency_no": "constituency_no", "AJSU_Party": "AJSU_Party", "Aadarsh_Sangram_Party": "Aadarsh_Sangram_Party", "Aapki_Vikas_Party": "Aapki_Vikas_Party", "Aazad_Samaj_Party_(Kanshi_Ram)": "Aazad_Samaj_Party_(Kanshi_Ram)", "Abua_Jharkhand_Party": "Abua_Jharkhand_Party", "Akhil_Bharatiya_Socialist_Party": "Akhil_Bharatiya_Socialist_Party", "Akhil_Bhartiya_Aarakshit_Samaj_Party": "Akhil_Bhartiya_Aarakshit_Samaj_Party", "Akhil_Bhartiya_Jharkhand_Party": "Akhil_Bhartiya_Jharkhand_Party", "All_India_Forward_Bloc": "All_India_Forward_Bloc", "All_India_Majlis-E-Ittehadul_Muslimeen": "All_India_Majlis-E-Ittehadul_Muslimeen", "Ambedkar_National_Congress": "Ambedkar_National_Congress", "Ambedkarite_Party_of_India": "Ambedkarite_Party_of_India", "Azad_Adhikar_Sena": "Azad_Adhikar_Sena", "Bahujan_Samaj_Party": "Bahujan_Samaj_Party", "Bhagidari_Party(P)": "Bhagidari_Party(P)", "Bharat_Adivasi_Party": "Bharat_Adivasi_Party", "Bharatiya_Jan_Jagriti_Party": "Bharatiya_Jan_Jagriti_Party", "Bharatiya_Janata_Party": "Bharatiya_Janata_Party", "Bharatiya_Rashtriya_Forward_Bloc": "Bharatiya_Rashtriya_Forward_Bloc", "Bharatiya_Sarvjan_Vikas_Party": "Bharatiya_Sarvjan_Vikas_Party", "Bhartiya_Azad_Sena": "Bhartiya_Azad_Sena", "Bhartiya_Janjagran_Gandhiwadi_Party": "Bhartiya_Janjagran_Gandhiwadi_Party", "Bhartiya_Rashtriya_Jagsewa_Party": "Bhartiya_Rashtriya_Jagsewa_Party", "Communist_Party_of_India": "Communist_Party_of_India", "Communist_Party_of_India_(Marxist)": "Communist_Party_of_India_(Marxist)", "Communist_Party_of_India_(Marxist-Leninist)_(Liberation)": "Communist_Party_of_India_(Marxist-Leninist)_(Liberation)", "Gondvana_Gantantra_Party": "Gondvana_Gantantra_Party", "Hamar_Raj_Party": "Hamar_Raj_Party", "Hindustan_Peoples_Party_(Democratic)": "Hindustan_Peoples_Party_(Democratic)", "Hindustani_Awam_Manch_(United)": "Hindustani_Awam_Manch_(United)", "Independent": "Independent", "Indian_National_Congress": "Indian_National_Congress", "Indian_National_Socialistic_Action_Forces": "Indian_National_Socialistic_Action_Forces", "Jagrook_Janta_Party": "Jagrook_Janta_Party", "Jai_Maha_Bharath_Party": "Jai_Maha_Bharath_Party", "Janata_Dal_(United)": "Janata_Dal_(United)", "Jharkhand_Jan_Kranti_Morcha": "Jharkhand_Jan_Kranti_Morcha", "Jharkhand_Loktantrik_Krantikari_Morcha": "Jharkhand_Loktantrik_Krantikari_Morcha", "Jharkhand_Mukti_Morcha": "Jharkhand_Mukti_Morcha", "Jharkhand_Mukti_Morcha_(Ulgulan)": "Jharkhand_Mukti_Morcha_(Ulgulan)", "Jharkhand_Party": "Jharkhand_Party", "Jharkhand_Peoples_Party": "Jharkhand_Peoples_Party", "Johaar_Party": "Johaar_Party", "Lok_Jan_Vikas_Morcha": "Lok_Jan_Vikas_Morcha", "Lok_Janshakti_Party(Ram_Vilas)": "Lok_Janshakti_Party(Ram_Vilas)", "Lokhit_Adhikar_Party": "Lokhit_Adhikar_Party", "Mera_Adhikaar_Rashtriya_Dal": "Mera_Adhikaar_Rashtriya_Dal", "NOTA": "NOTA", "Nationalist_Congress_Party": "Nationalist_Congress_Party", "Navyug_Pragatisheel_Morcha": "Navyug_Pragatisheel_Morcha", "Nyaydharmsabha": "Nyaydharmsabha", "Peoples_Party_of_India_(Democratic)": "Peoples_Party_of_India_(Democratic)", "Purvanchal_Mahapanchayat": "Purvanchal_Mahapanchayat", "Rashtriya_Deshaj_Party": "Rashtriya_Deshaj_Party", "Rashtriya_Jaihind_Party": "Rashtriya_Jaihind_Party", "Rashtriya_Janata_Dal": "Rashtriya_Janata_Dal", "Rashtriya_Jankranti_Morcha": "Rashtriya_Jankranti_Morcha", "Rashtriya_Jansangharsh_Swaraj_Party": "Rashtriya_Jansangharsh_Swaraj_Party", "Rashtriya_Lok_Dal": "Rashtriya_Lok_Dal", "Rashtriya_Republican_Party": "Rashtriya_Republican_Party", "Rashtriya_Samanta_Dal": "Rashtriya_Samanta_Dal", "Rashtriya_Suraksha_Party": "Rashtriya_Suraksha_Party", "Republican_Party_of_India_(A)": "Republican_Party_of_India_(A)", "Right_to_Recall_Party": "Right_to_Recall_Party", "Sadan_Vikas_Party": "Sadan_Vikas_Party", "Samajwadi_Party": "Samajwadi_Party", "Samata_Party": "Samata_Party", "Sampoorna_Bharat_Kranti_Party": "Sampoorna_Bharat_Kranti_Party", "Shiv_Sena": "Shiv_Sena", "Social_Democratic_Party_Of_India": "Social_Democratic_Party_Of_India", "Socialist_Unity_Centre_Of_India_(COMMUNIST)": "Socialist_Unity_Centre_Of_India_(COMMUNIST)", "Swabhiman_Party": "Swabhiman_Party", "Swatantra_Rashtravadi_Party": "Swatantra_Rashtravadi_Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 81, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 81, "registered_not_positive": 81, "cast_gt_registered": 81}, "n_stations_flagged": 81, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:06.804332", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.381, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.281, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.281, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 81}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9e56ed8e47244c0da0f60fddca993702", "name": "India 2025 local (overnight india_delhi_2025_vidhansabha.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2025, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.opencity.in/dataset/delhi-assembly-elections-2025-results (ECI-sourced candidate results CSV) + https://data.opencity.in/dataset/delhi-assembly-elections-2025-turnout (ECI Final Turnout PDF: Total Electors + Total Votes polled)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ac_no": "ac_no", "bjp": "bjp", "aap": "aap", "inc": "inc", "bsp": "bsp", "nota": "nota", "other": "other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 70, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 70, "cast_valid_mismatch": 70}, "n_stations_flagged": 70, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:05.635324", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.377, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.26, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.472, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.45, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.377, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.377, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.26, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.26, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.534, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.667, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.684, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.684, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.458, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.458, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 70}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "63a06ee033df41438e0dd222df3d8dfb", "name": "India 2022 local (state legislative assembly) (overnight india_himachal_2022_vidhansabha.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"NOTA": "NOTA", "turnout_pct_indiavotes": "turnout_pct_indiavotes", "AAP-Abhishek_Singh": "AAP-Abhishek_Singh", "AAP-Ajay_Singh": "AAP-Ajay_Singh", "AAP-Amar_Singh": "AAP-Amar_Singh", "AAP-Anil_Kumar_Mankotia": "AAP-Anil_Kumar_Mankotia", "AAP-Anil_Rana": "AAP-Anil_Rana", "AAP-Anju": "AAP-Anju", "AAP-Anurag_Prarthi": "AAP-Anurag_Prarthi", "AAP-Ashwani_Kumar": "AAP-Ashwani_Kumar", "AAP-Attar_Singh_Chandel": "AAP-Attar_Singh_Chandel", "AAP-Baldev_Raj": "AAP-Baldev_Raj", "AAP-Bhagwant_Singh": "AAP-Bhagwant_Singh", "AAP-Chaman_Rakesh": "AAP-Chaman_Rakesh", "AAP-Dhameshwar_Ram": "AAP-Dhameshwar_Ram", "AAP-Dharam_Pal": "AAP-Dharam_Pal", "AAP-Dr_Rajan_Sushant": "AAP-Dr_Rajan_Sushant", "AAP-Dr_Rajesh_Chanana": "AAP-Dr_Rajesh_Chanana", "AAP-Gita_Nand": "AAP-Gita_Nand", "AAP-Gulshan": "AAP-Gulshan", "AAP-Harmel_Singh": "AAP-Harmel_Singh", "AAP-Hoshiar_Singh": "AAP-Hoshiar_Singh", "AAP-Inder_Pal": "AAP-Inder_Pal", "AAP-Jabna_Kumari": "AAP-Jabna_Kumari", "AAP-Jagdish_Singh": "AAP-Jagdish_Singh", "AAP-Jeet_Ram": "AAP-Jeet_Ram", "AAP-Kulwant_Singh_Rana": "AAP-Kulwant_Singh_Rana", "AAP-Manish_Kumar": "AAP-Manish_Kumar", "AAP-Manish_Kumar_Thakur": "AAP-Manish_Kumar_Thakur", "AAP-Manish_Sareen": "AAP-Manish_Sareen", "AAP-Manisha_Kumari": "AAP-Manisha_Kumari", "AAP-Manohar_Lal_Dadwal": "AAP-Manohar_Lal_Dadwal", "AAP-Naathu_Ram_Chauhan": "AAP-Naathu_Ram_Chauhan", "AAP-Nand_Kumar_Jaryal": "AAP-Nand_Kumar_Jaryal", "AAP-Naresh_Kumar": "AAP-Naresh_Kumar", "AAP-Narinder_Singh": "AAP-Narinder_Singh", "AAP-Neeraj_Saini": "AAP-Neeraj_Saini", "AAP-Parkash_Chand": "AAP-Parkash_Chand", "AAP-Parmodh_Chand": "AAP-Parmodh_Chand", "AAP-Pooja_Verma": "AAP-Pooja_Verma", "AAP-Prem_Kumar": "AAP-Prem_Kumar", "AAP-Raj_Kumar": "AAP-Raj_Kumar", "AAP-Rajiv_Gautam": "AAP-Rajiv_Gautam", "AAP-Rajni_Kaushal": "AAP-Rajni_Kaushal", "AAP-Rakesh_Kumar_Chopra": "AAP-Rakesh_Kumar_Chopra", "AAP-Rakesh_Mandhotra": "AAP-Rakesh_Mandhotra", "AAP-Ram_Kishan": "AAP-Ram_Kishan", "AAP-Ram_Paul": "AAP-Ram_Paul", "AAP-Ravinder_Pal_Singh": "AAP-Ravinder_Pal_Singh", "AAP-Ravinder_Pal_Singh_Mann": "AAP-Ravinder_Pal_Singh_Mann", "AAP-Ravinder_Singh": "AAP-Ravinder_Singh", "AAP-Sahil_Chouhan": "AAP-Sahil_Chouhan", "AAP-Sanjay_Bhardwaj": "AAP-Sanjay_Bhardwaj", "AAP-Santosh_Kumar": "AAP-Santosh_Kumar", "AAP-Sh_Uday_Singhta": "AAP-Sh_Uday_Singhta", "AAP-Shankey_Thukral": "AAP-Shankey_Thukral", "AAP-Shasi_Kant": "AAP-Shasi_Kant", "AAP-Sher_Singh": "AAP-Sher_Singh", "AAP-Shrikant_Chauhan": "AAP-Shrikant_Chauhan", "AAP-Shyam_Lal": "AAP-Shyam_Lal", "AAP-Sudarshan_Jaspa": "AAP-Sudarshan_Jaspa", "AAP-Sudhir_Kumar": "AAP-Sudhir_Kumar", "AAP-Sunil_Sharma": "AAP-Sunil_Sharma", "AAP-Sushil_Kumar_Surroch": "AAP-Sushil_Kumar_Surroch", "AAP-Swarn_Singh_Saini": "AAP-Swarn_Singh_Saini", "AAP-Tara_Chand": "AAP-Tara_Chand", "AAP-Tersem_Singh": "AAP-Tersem_Singh", "AAP-Uday_Singh": "AAP-Uday_Singh", "AAP-Uma_Kant": "AAP-Uma_Kant", "BJP-Ajay_Shyam": "BJP-Ajay_Shyam", "BJP-Anil_Sharma": "BJP-Anil_Sharma", "BJP-Arun_Kumar": "BJP-Arun_Kumar", "BJP-Balbir_Singh": "BJP-Balbir_Singh", "BJP-Baldev_Singh": "BJP-Baldev_Singh", "BJP-Bikram_Singh": "BJP-Bikram_Singh", "BJP-Chetan_Singh_Bragta": "BJP-Chetan_Singh_Bragta", "BJP-Dalip_Thakur": "BJP-Dalip_Thakur", "BJP-Deep_Raj": "BJP-Deep_Raj", "BJP-Dhavinder_Singh": "BJP-Dhavinder_Singh", "BJP-Dr_Anil_Dhiman": "BJP-Dr_Anil_Dhiman", "BJP-Dr_Janak_Raj": "BJP-Dr_Janak_Raj", "BJP-Dr_Rajeev_Bindal": "BJP-Dr_Rajeev_Bindal", "BJP-Dr_Ram_Lal_Markanda": "BJP-Dr_Ram_Lal_Markanda", "BJP-Govind_Ram": "BJP-Govind_Ram", "BJP-Govind_Singh_Thakur": "BJP-Govind_Singh_Thakur", "BJP-Hans_Raj": "BJP-Hans_Raj", "BJP-Inder_Singh": "BJP-Inder_Singh", "BJP-Jai_Ram_Thakur": "BJP-Jai_Ram_Thakur", "BJP-Jeet_Ram_Katwal": "BJP-Jeet_Ram_Katwal", "BJP-Kaul_Singh": "BJP-Kaul_Singh", "BJP-Lakhwinder_Singh_Rana": "BJP-Lakhwinder_Singh_Rana", "BJP-Lokender_Kumar": "BJP-Lokender_Kumar", "BJP-Maya_Sharma": "BJP-Maya_Sharma", "BJP-Mulkh_Raj": "BJP-Mulkh_Raj", "BJP-Narain_Singh": "BJP-Narain_Singh", "BJP-Narinder_Thakur": "BJP-Narinder_Thakur", "BJP-Narotam_Singh": "BJP-Narotam_Singh", "BJP-Neelam_Nayyar": "BJP-Neelam_Nayyar", "BJP-Paramjeet_Singh_Pammi": "BJP-Paramjeet_Singh_Pammi", "BJP-Pawan_Kumar_Kajal": "BJP-Pawan_Kumar_Kajal", "BJP-Prakash_Prem_Kumar": "BJP-Prakash_Prem_Kumar", "BJP-Puran_Chand": "BJP-Puran_Chand", "BJP-Rajat_Thakur": "BJP-Rajat_Thakur", "BJP-Rajesh_Kashyap": "BJP-Rajesh_Kashyap", "BJP-Rajesh_Thakur": "BJP-Rajesh_Thakur", "BJP-Rajinder_Garg": "BJP-Rajinder_Garg", "BJP-Rajiv_Saizal": "BJP-Rajiv_Saizal", "BJP-Rakesh_Kumar": "BJP-Rakesh_Kumar", "BJP-Rakesh_Pathania": "BJP-Rakesh_Pathania", "BJP-Ram_Kumar": "BJP-Ram_Kumar", "BJP-Ramesh_Chand": "BJP-Ramesh_Chand", "BJP-Ranbir_Singh": "BJP-Ranbir_Singh", "BJP-Randhir_Sharma": "BJP-Randhir_Sharma", "BJP-Ranjit_Singh_Rana": "BJP-Ranjit_Singh_Rana", "BJP-Ravi_Kumar_Mehta": "BJP-Ravi_Kumar_Mehta", "BJP-Ravinder_Kumar_Dhiman": "BJP-Ravinder_Kumar_Dhiman", "BJP-Ravinder_Singh": "BJP-Ravinder_Singh", "BJP-Reena": "BJP-Reena", "BJP-Reeta_Devi": "BJP-Reeta_Devi", "BJP-Sanjay_Guleria": "BJP-Sanjay_Guleria", "BJP-Sanjay_Sood": "BJP-Sanjay_Sood", "BJP-Sarveen": "BJP-Sarveen", "BJP-Satpal_Singh_Satti": "BJP-Satpal_Singh_Satti", "BJP-Sh_Balbir_Singh_Verma": "BJP-Sh_Balbir_Singh_Verma", "BJP-Shashi_Bala": "BJP-Shashi_Bala", "BJP-Sukh_Ram": "BJP-Sukh_Ram", "BJP-Surat_Negi": "BJP-Surat_Negi", "BJP-Surender_Shourie": "BJP-Surender_Shourie", "BJP-Suresh_Bhardwaj": "BJP-Suresh_Bhardwaj", "BJP-Trilok_Jamwal": "BJP-Trilok_Jamwal", "BJP-Trilok_Kapoor": "BJP-Trilok_Kapoor", "BJP-Vijay_Kumar": "BJP-Vijay_Kumar", "BJP-Vinod_Kumar": "BJP-Vinod_Kumar", "BJP-Vipin_Singh_Parmar": "BJP-Vipin_Singh_Parmar", "BJP-Virender_Kanwar": "BJP-Virender_Kanwar", "BSP-Ajay_Kumar": "BSP-Ajay_Kumar", "BSP-Amar_Nath": "BSP-Amar_Nath", "BSP-Anil_Kapoor": "BSP-Anil_Kapoor", "BSP-Ayodhya_Prasad_Verma": "BSP-Ayodhya_Prasad_Verma", "BSP-Balvinder_Kumar_Singh": "BSP-Balvinder_Kumar_Singh", "BSP-Banarshi_Dass_Dogra": "BSP-Banarshi_Dass_Dogra", "BSP-Bhagat_Lal": "BSP-Bhagat_Lal", "BSP-Bir_Singh": "BSP-Bir_Singh", "BSP-Chaman_Lal": "BSP-Chaman_Lal", "BSP-Chet_Ram": "BSP-Chet_Ram", "BSP-Desh_Raj": "BSP-Desh_Raj", "BSP-Gian_Chand": "BSP-Gian_Chand", "BSP-Hans_Raj": "BSP-Hans_Raj", "BSP-Harbans_Singh": "BSP-Harbans_Singh", "BSP-Indra_Devi": "BSP-Indra_Devi", "BSP-Jarnail_Singh": "BSP-Jarnail_Singh", "BSP-Jhabe_Ram_Kaushal": "BSP-Jhabe_Ram_Kaushal", "BSP-Jia_Lal_Sadhak": "BSP-Jia_Lal_Sadhak", "BSP-Kameshwar": "BSP-Kameshwar", "BSP-Kamlesh": "BSP-Kamlesh", "BSP-Lekh_Raj_Katnoria": "BSP-Lekh_Raj_Katnoria", "BSP-Nagender_Chand": "BSP-Nagender_Chand", "BSP-Nand_Lal": "BSP-Nand_Lal", "BSP-Narayan_Singh": "BSP-Narayan_Singh", "BSP-Narender_Kumar": "BSP-Narender_Kumar", "BSP-Naresh_Kumar": "BSP-Naresh_Kumar", "BSP-Paras_Bains": "BSP-Paras_Bains", "BSP-Paras_Ram": "BSP-Paras_Ram", "BSP-Prakash_Andta": "BSP-Prakash_Andta", "BSP-Prakash_Chand_Bhardwaj": "BSP-Prakash_Chand_Bhardwaj", "BSP-Praveen_Kumar_Kaushal": "BSP-Praveen_Kumar_Kaushal", "BSP-Prem_Chand": "BSP-Prem_Chand", "BSP-Prem_Kumar": "BSP-Prem_Kumar", "BSP-Prem_Lal_Banga": "BSP-Prem_Lal_Banga", "BSP-Rajesh_Kumar_Gill": "BSP-Rajesh_Kumar_Gill", "BSP-Rajinder": "BSP-Rajinder", "BSP-Ram_Pal": "BSP-Ram_Pal", "BSP-Ram_Rattan": "BSP-Ram_Rattan", "BSP-Ramesh_Chand": "BSP-Ramesh_Chand", "BSP-Ramesh_Kumar": "BSP-Ramesh_Kumar", "BSP-Rattan_Chand_Katoch": "BSP-Rattan_Chand_Katoch", "BSP-Sali_Ram": "BSP-Sali_Ram", "BSP-Seema": "BSP-Seema", "BSP-Suresh_Kumar": "BSP-Suresh_Kumar", "BSP-Sushil_Kumar": "BSP-Sushil_Kumar", "BSP-Tara_Chand": "BSP-Tara_Chand", "BSP-Tilak_Raj": "BSP-Tilak_Raj", "BSP-Vijay_Kumar": "BSP-Vijay_Kumar", "BSP-Virender_Kumar": "BSP-Virender_Kumar", "BVD-Uttam_Chand": "BVD-Uttam_Chand", "CPI(M)-Ashish_Kumar": "CPI(M)-Ashish_Kumar", "CPI(M)-Devki_Nand": "CPI(M)-Devki_Nand", "CPI(M)-Hotam_Singh": "CPI(M)-Hotam_Singh", "CPI(M)-Kashmir_Singh_Thakur": "CPI(M)-Kashmir_Singh_Thakur", "CPI(M)-Kishori_Lal": "CPI(M)-Kishori_Lal", "CPI(M)-Kuldip_Singh_Tanwar": "CPI(M)-Kuldip_Singh_Tanwar", "CPI(M)-Kushal_Bhardwaj": "CPI(M)-Kushal_Bhardwaj", "CPI(M)-Mahender_Rana": "CPI(M)-Mahender_Rana", "CPI(M)-Rakesh_Singha": "CPI(M)-Rakesh_Singha", "CPI(M)-Tikender_Singh_Panwar": "CPI(M)-Tikender_Singh_Panwar", "CPI(M)-Vishal_Shankta": "CPI(M)-Vishal_Shankta", "CPI-Bhag_Singh": "CPI-Bhag_Singh", "HJKP_ABBR11-Arun_Kumar": "HJKP_ABBR11-Arun_Kumar", "HJKP_ABBR11-Chet_Ram": "HJKP_ABBR11-Chet_Ram", "HJKP_ABBR11-Paramjit_Singh": "HJKP_ABBR11-Paramjit_Singh", "HJKP_ABBR11-Puja": "HJKP_ABBR11-Puja", "HJKP_ABBR11-Raghubir_Singh": "HJKP_ABBR11-Raghubir_Singh", "HJKP_ABBR11-Rajinder": "HJKP_ABBR11-Rajinder", "HJP_ABBR_4-Rasila_Ram": "HJP_ABBR_4-Rasila_Ram", "HSP-Amrita_Chaudhry": "HSP-Amrita_Chaudhry", "HSP-Ashish_Sharma": "HSP-Ashish_Sharma", "HSP-Laxman_Dass": "HSP-Laxman_Dass", "INC-Ajay_Mahajan": "INC-Ajay_Mahajan", "INC-Ajay_Solanki": "INC-Ajay_Solanki", "INC-Anirudh_Singh": "INC-Anirudh_Singh", "INC-Asha_Kumari": "INC-Asha_Kumari", "INC-Ashish_Butail": "INC-Ashish_Butail", "INC-Bansi_Lal": "INC-Bansi_Lal", "INC-Bhawani_Singh_Pathania": "INC-Bhawani_Singh_Pathania", "INC-Bhuvneshwar_Gaur": "INC-Bhuvneshwar_Gaur", "INC-Bumber_Thakur": "INC-Bumber_Thakur", "INC-Chaitanya_Sharma": "INC-Chaitanya_Sharma", "INC-Champa_Thakur": "INC-Champa_Thakur", "INC-Chander_Kumar": "INC-Chander_Kumar", "INC-Chander_Shekhar": "INC-Chander_Shekhar", "INC-Chet_Ram": "INC-Chet_Ram", "INC-Davinder_Kumar": "INC-Davinder_Kumar", "INC-Dayal_Pyari": "INC-Dayal_Pyari", "INC-Dhani_Ram_Shandil": "INC-Dhani_Ram_Shandil", "INC-Dr_Rajesh_Sharma": "INC-Dr_Rajesh_Sharma", "INC-Hardeep_Singh_Bawa": "INC-Hardeep_Singh_Bawa", "INC-Harish_Janartha": "INC-Harish_Janartha", "INC-Harshwardhan_Chauhan": "INC-Harshwardhan_Chauhan", "INC-Inder_Dutt_Lakhanpal": "INC-Inder_Dutt_Lakhanpal", "INC-Jagat_Singh_Negi": "INC-Jagat_Singh_Negi", "INC-Jagdish_Chand_Sapehia": "INC-Jagdish_Chand_Sapehia", "INC-Kaul_Singh": "INC-Kaul_Singh", "INC-Kewal_Singh": "INC-Kewal_Singh", "INC-Khimi_Ram": "INC-Khimi_Ram", "INC-Kirnesh_Jung": "INC-Kirnesh_Jung", "INC-Kishori_Lal": "INC-Kishori_Lal", "INC-Kuldeep_Singh_Pathania": "INC-Kuldeep_Singh_Pathania", "INC-Kuldeep_Singh_Rathore": "INC-Kuldeep_Singh_Rathore", "INC-Mahesh_Raj": "INC-Mahesh_Raj", "INC-Malender_Rajan": "INC-Malender_Rajan", "INC-Mohan_Lal_Brakta": "INC-Mohan_Lal_Brakta", "INC-Mukesh_Agnihotri": "INC-Mukesh_Agnihotri", "INC-Nand_Lal": "INC-Nand_Lal", "INC-Naresh_Kumar": "INC-Naresh_Kumar", "INC-Neeraj_Nayar": "INC-Neeraj_Nayar", "INC-Pawan_Kumar": "INC-Pawan_Kumar", "INC-Prakash_Chaudhary": "INC-Prakash_Chaudhary", "INC-Pushpinder_Verma": "INC-Pushpinder_Verma", "INC-R_S_Bali": "INC-R_S_Bali", "INC-Rajesh_Dharmani": "INC-Rajesh_Dharmani", "INC-Rajinder_Singh": "INC-Rajinder_Singh", "INC-Ram_Kumar": "INC-Ram_Kumar", "INC-Ram_Lal_Thakur": "INC-Ram_Lal_Thakur", "INC-Ravi_Thakur": "INC-Ravi_Thakur", "INC-Rohit_Thakur": "INC-Rohit_Thakur", "INC-Sanjay": "INC-Sanjay", "INC-Sanjay_Rattan": "INC-Sanjay_Rattan", "INC-Satpal_Singh_Raizada": "INC-Satpal_Singh_Raizada", "INC-Sh_Rajneesh_Kimta": "INC-Sh_Rajneesh_Kimta", "INC-Sohan_Lal": "INC-Sohan_Lal", "INC-Sudarshan_Singh_Babloo": "INC-Sudarshan_Singh_Babloo", "INC-Sudhir_Sharma": "INC-Sudhir_Sharma", "INC-Sukhvinder_Singh": "INC-Sukhvinder_Singh", "INC-Sunder_Singh_Thakur": "INC-Sunder_Singh_Thakur", "INC-Suresh_Kumar": "INC-Suresh_Kumar", "INC-Surinder_Kumar": "INC-Surinder_Kumar", "INC-Surinder_Singh_Mankotia": "INC-Surinder_Singh_Mankotia", "INC-Thakur_Singh_Bharmouri": "INC-Thakur_Singh_Bharmouri", "INC-Thakur_Surender_Paul": "INC-Thakur_Surender_Paul", "INC-Vikramaditya_Singh": "INC-Vikramaditya_Singh", "INC-Vinay_Kumar": "INC-Vinay_Kumar", "INC-Vinod_Sultanpuri": "INC-Vinod_Sultanpuri", "INC-Vivek_Kumar": "INC-Vivek_Kumar", "INC-Yadvinder_Goma": "INC-Yadvinder_Goma", "INC-Yashwant_Singh": "INC-Yashwant_Singh", "IND-Abhay_Kumar_Ashok": "IND-Abhay_Kumar_Ashok", "IND-Abhishek_Barowalia": "IND-Abhishek_Barowalia", "IND-Abhishek_Thakur": "IND-Abhishek_Thakur", "IND-Adv_Sanjay_Sharma": "IND-Adv_Sanjay_Sharma", "IND-Amit_Mehta": "IND-Amit_Mehta", "IND-Amit_Verma": "IND-Amit_Verma", "IND-Ashish_Kumar": "IND-Ashish_Kumar", "IND-Ashish_Sharma": "IND-Ashish_Sharma", "IND-Atul_Kaushal": "IND-Atul_Kaushal", "IND-Baba_Lal_Giri": "IND-Baba_Lal_Giri", "IND-Capt_Jaidayal_Singh_Pal": "IND-Capt_Jaidayal_Singh_Pal", "IND-Chander_Bhan": "IND-Chander_Bhan", "IND-Chander_Mohan": "IND-Chander_Mohan", "IND-Chander_Shekhar": "IND-Chander_Shekhar", "IND-Des_Raj_Chauhan": "IND-Des_Raj_Chauhan", "IND-Dr_Ashok_Kumar_Somal": "IND-Dr_Ashok_Kumar_Somal", "IND-Dr_Kehar_Singh": "IND-Dr_Kehar_Singh", "IND-Dr_Subhash_Chand_Manglate": "IND-Dr_Subhash_Chand_Manglate", "IND-Dr_Swaroop_Singh_Rana": "IND-Dr_Swaroop_Singh_Rana", "IND-Gangu_Ram_Musafir": "IND-Gangu_Ram_Musafir", "IND-Ghanshyam": "IND-Ghanshyam", "IND-Gian_Chand": "IND-Gian_Chand", "IND-Gurdas_Ram": "IND-Gurdas_Ram", "IND-Het_Ram": "IND-Het_Ram", "IND-Hiteshwar_Singh": "IND-Hiteshwar_Singh", "IND-Hoshyar_Singh": "IND-Hoshyar_Singh", "IND-Indira": "IND-Indira", "IND-Indu_Varma": "IND-Indu_Varma", "IND-Jagjiwan_Paul": "IND-Jagjiwan_Paul", "IND-Jagpal_Singh_Rana": "IND-Jagpal_Singh_Rana", "IND-Jasveer_Singh": "IND-Jasveer_Singh", "IND-Jitender_Pal": "IND-Jitender_Pal", "IND-Joginder_Singh": "IND-Joginder_Singh", "IND-K_L_Thakur": "IND-K_L_Thakur", "IND-Kamal_Kumar": "IND-Kamal_Kumar", "IND-Kewal_Kumar": "IND-Kewal_Kumar", "IND-Kishori_Lal": "IND-Kishori_Lal", "IND-Kripal_Singh_Parmar": "IND-Kripal_Singh_Parmar", "IND-Kulbhash_Chand": "IND-Kulbhash_Chand", "IND-Kulbhushan_Thakur": "IND-Kulbhushan_Thakur", "IND-Lata_Chandel": "IND-Lata_Chandel", "IND-Laxmender_Singh": "IND-Laxmender_Singh", "IND-Lot_Rama_Thakur": "IND-Lot_Rama_Thakur", "IND-Mahinder_Singh": "IND-Mahinder_Singh", "IND-Major_Khem_Singh_Thakur": "IND-Major_Khem_Singh_Thakur", "IND-Manish_Tomar": "IND-Manish_Tomar", "IND-Manohar_Lal": "IND-Manohar_Lal", "IND-Mukesh_Kumar": "IND-Mukesh_Kumar", "IND-Munish_Sharma": "IND-Munish_Sharma", "IND-Nand_Lal": "IND-Nand_Lal", "IND-Narender_Kumar": "IND-Narender_Kumar", "IND-Naresh_Kumar_Darji": "IND-Naresh_Kumar_Darji", "IND-Nirmal_Parshad": "IND-Nirmal_Parshad", "IND-Nirmal_Singh": "IND-Nirmal_Singh", "IND-Om_Prakash": "IND-Om_Prakash", "IND-Paras_Ram": "IND-Paras_Ram", "IND-Pawan_Kumar": "IND-Pawan_Kumar", "IND-Piyush_Kanga": "IND-Piyush_Kanga", "IND-Praveen_Kumar": "IND-Praveen_Kumar", "IND-Pritam_Dev": "IND-Pritam_Dev", "IND-Raj_Kumar": "IND-Raj_Kumar", "IND-Rajeev_Kumar": "IND-Rajeev_Kumar", "IND-Rajender": "IND-Rajender", "IND-Rajender_Singh": "IND-Rajender_Singh", "IND-Rajesh_Kumar": "IND-Rajesh_Kumar", "IND-Ram_Singh": "IND-Ram_Singh", "IND-Ramesh_Kumar": "IND-Ramesh_Kumar", "IND-Rameshwar": "IND-Rameshwar", "IND-Ramjan": "IND-Ramjan", "IND-Ranjit_Singh": "IND-Ranjit_Singh", "IND-Rekha_Rani": "IND-Rekha_Rani", "IND-Rinku": "IND-Rinku", "IND-Roshan_Lal_Chaudhary": "IND-Roshan_Lal_Chaudhary", "IND-Sanjay_Kumar": "IND-Sanjay_Kumar", "IND-Sanjay_Prashar": "IND-Sanjay_Prashar", "IND-Sanjeev": "IND-Sanjeev", "IND-Sanjeev_Kumar": "IND-Sanjeev_Kumar", "IND-Saunu_Ram": "IND-Saunu_Ram", "IND-Sh_Ashok_Kumar": "IND-Sh_Ashok_Kumar", "IND-Sikander_Kumar": "IND-Sikander_Kumar", "IND-Subhash_Chand_Shukla": "IND-Subhash_Chand_Shukla", "IND-Subhash_Sharma": "IND-Subhash_Sharma", "IND-Subhash_Singh_Dhadwal": "IND-Subhash_Singh_Dhadwal", "IND-Suman_Kadam": "IND-Suman_Kadam", "IND-Suman_Kumar": "IND-Suman_Kumar", "IND-Sunil_Kumar": "IND-Sunil_Kumar", "IND-Surender_Kumar": "IND-Surender_Kumar", "IND-Surender_Singh": "IND-Surender_Singh", "IND-Surender_Singh_Thakur": "IND-Surender_Singh_Thakur", "IND-Tejwant_Singh_Negi": "IND-Tejwant_Singh_Negi", "IND-Tek_Chand": "IND-Tek_Chand", "IND-Varun_Kumar": "IND-Varun_Kumar", "IND-Varun_Kumar_Thakur": "IND-Varun_Kumar_Thakur", "IND-Vijay_Koundal": "IND-Vijay_Koundal", "IND-Vijay_Pal_Khachi": "IND-Vijay_Pal_Khachi", "IND-Vipan_Kumar_Nehria": "IND-Vipan_Kumar_Nehria", "RASHTRIYALOK-Mehar_Chand": "RASHTRIYALOK-Mehar_Chand", "RDP-Abhinay_Bhardwaj": "RDP-Abhinay_Bhardwaj", "RDP-Amar_Chand": "RDP-Amar_Chand", "RDP-Ashhwani_Kumar_Rana": "RDP-Ashhwani_Kumar_Rana", "RDP-Ashok_Kumar_Bakaria": "RDP-Ashok_Kumar_Bakaria", "RDP-Ashwani_Verma": "RDP-Ashwani_Verma", "RDP-Balwant_Singh": "RDP-Balwant_Singh", "RDP-Deepak_Kumar": "RDP-Deepak_Kumar", "RDP-Jagdish_Chand": "RDP-Jagdish_Chand", "RDP-Jagmohan_Singh": "RDP-Jagmohan_Singh", "RDP-Jai_Dev_Singh": "RDP-Jai_Dev_Singh", "RDP-Jiwan_Ram": "RDP-Jiwan_Ram", "RDP-Kailash_Chand": "RDP-Kailash_Chand", "RDP-Kalyan_Singh": "RDP-Kalyan_Singh", "RDP-Kamal_Kant": "RDP-Kamal_Kant", "RDP-Manoj_Kumar": "RDP-Manoj_Kumar", "RDP-Narender_Singh": "RDP-Narender_Singh", "RDP-Naresh_Kumar": "RDP-Naresh_Kumar", "RDP-Puja_Pal": "RDP-Puja_Pal", "RDP-Puran_Dutt": "RDP-Puran_Dutt", "RDP-Rajeev_Kumar_Kaundel": "RDP-Rajeev_Kumar_Kaundel", "RDP-Ram_Prakash": "RDP-Ram_Prakash", "RDP-Ran_Vijay_Singh": "RDP-Ran_Vijay_Singh", "RDP-Salender_Singh": "RDP-Salender_Singh", "RDP-Sanjay_Kumar": "RDP-Sanjay_Kumar", "RDP-Suresh_Kumar": "RDP-Suresh_Kumar", "RDP-Susheel_Kumar_Bhrigu": "RDP-Susheel_Kumar_Bhrigu", "RDP-Sushil_Kumar": "RDP-Sushil_Kumar", "RDP-Vinod_Dadwal_(Pintu)": "RDP-Vinod_Dadwal_(Pintu)", "RDP-Yogesh_Thakur": "RDP-Yogesh_Thakur", "SP_ABBR3-Bal_Ram": "SP_ABBR3-Bal_Ram", "SP_ABBR3-Kishori_Lal": "SP_ABBR3-Kishori_Lal", "SP_ABBR3-Vishesh": "SP_ABBR3-Vishesh", "SaSP-Thakur_Singh": "SaSP-Thakur_Singh"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 68, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 68, "cast_gt_registered": 68, "registered_not_positive": 68}, "n_stations_flagged": 68, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:04.793801", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.384, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.291, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.384, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.384, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.291, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.291, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.553, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.764, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.442, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 68}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a5cf758339bc424295d3c215dfd33e07", "name": "Spain 2023 local (overnight spain_baleares_2023_parlament_municipio.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "IBESTAT (Institut d'Estadistica de les Illes Balears) edatos statistical-resources REST API; datasets IBESTAT:000199A_000081 (Resultados segun candidaturas, elecciones autonomicas 2023) + IBESTAT:000199A_000012 (Participacion y tipo de voto, autonomicas 2023). https://ibestat.es/edatos/apis/statisti", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"valid_candidatura": "valid_candidatura", "RESET": "RESET", "PLIE": "PLIE", "EUIB-PODEMOS": "EUIB-PODEMOS", "VOX": "VOX", "GXF_+_PSIB-PSOE": "GXF_+_PSIB-PSOE", "EPIC-EL_PI": "EPIC-EL_PI", "PERXB": "PERXB", "PROGRESO_EN_VERDE_PACMA": "PROGRESO_EN_VERDE_PACMA", "MXME": "MXME", "ORDEN": "ORDEN", "M\u00c9S": "M\u00c9S", "ARA_EIVISSA": "ARA_EIVISSA", "PP": "PP", "CPERB": "CPERB", "EL_PI": "EL_PI", "PSIB-PSOE": "PSIB-PSOE", "SA_UNI\u00d3": "SA_UNI\u00d3", "CS": "CS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 67, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 67}, "n_stations_flagged": 67, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:02.672599", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.831, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.269, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.759, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.269, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.067, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.067, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 67}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a46c925d87244184b17522eab4a1cc09", "name": "Germany 2022 local (overnight germany_saarland_2022_landtag.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://wahlergebnis.saarland.de/LTW/download.html (file KERG_SAARLAND.csv)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CDU": "CDU", "SPD": "SPD", "DIE_LINKE": "DIE_LINKE", "AfD": "AfD", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "FDP": "FDP", "FAMILIE": "FAMILIE", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "FREIE_WAEHLER": "FREIE_WAEHLER", "dieBasis": "dieBasis", "bunt_saar": "bunt_saar", "OEDP": "OEDP", "PdH": "PdH", "Die_PARTEI": "Die_PARTEI", "PfG": "PfG", "Tierschutzpartei": "Tierschutzpartei", "SGV": "SGV", "Volt": "Volt"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 52, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:01.781850", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.855, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.806, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.018, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 52}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bc80d43c9779407a90bab0db7fb2d4b6", "name": "Germany 2024 local (overnight germany_thuringia_2024_landtag_wahlkreis.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://wahlen.thueringen.de/datenbank/wahl1/wahl.asp?wahlart=LW&wJahr=2024&zeigeErg=WK", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"wb_erfasst": "wb_erfasst", "wb_total": "wb_total", "DIE LINKE": "DIE LINKE", "AfD": "AfD", "CDU": "CDU", "SPD": "SPD", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "FDP": "FDP", "TIERSCHUTZ_hier": "TIERSCHUTZ_hier", "OEDP_Familie": "OEDP_Familie", "PIRATEN": "PIRATEN", "MLPD": "MLPD", "BUENDNIS_DEUTSCHLAND": "BUENDNIS_DEUTSCHLAND", "BSW": "BSW", "FAMILIE": "FAMILIE", "FREIE_WAEHLER": "FREIE_WAEHLER", "WerteUnion": "WerteUnion"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 44, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 44}, "n_stations_flagged": 44, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:00.978797", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.825, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.778, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.567, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 44}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e25e9c23942e4f68a39b86dc66b05835", "name": "Trinidad and Tobago 1961 parliamentary (overnight trinidad_tobago_1961_house_constituency.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Trinidad and Tobago", "year": 1961, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ebctt.com/wp-content/uploads/Report-on-the-Parliamentary-General-Elections-1961-4th-December-1961.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PNM": "PNM", "DLP": "DLP", "ANC": "ANC", "BP": "BP", "Ind": "Ind"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 30, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 30, "cast_gt_registered": 30}, "n_stations_flagged": 30, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:15:00.220693", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.455, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.668, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.487, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.374, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.455, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 1961, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.668, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.133, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 1961, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.371, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.593, "year": 1961, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.805, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 1961, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1961, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.216, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.304, "year": 1961, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.487, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.487, "year": 1961, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 1961, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.239, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.239, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.755, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 1961, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 1961, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.152, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.152, "year": 1961, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 1961, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 30}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a9f850b80d7c47a38637cd72a5d83a67", "name": "Malta 1971 parliamentary (overnight malta_1971_general_district.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Malta", "year": 1971, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.um.edu.mt/__data/assets/excel_doc/0016/180151/district-res-1971.xls", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"district_number": "district_number", "MLP": "MLP", "PN": "PN", "PCP": "PCP", "IND": "IND", "non_transferable_count1": "non_transferable_count1"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 10, "cast_gt_registered": 10, "registered_not_positive": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-06-27T13:14:59.525744", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.533, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.721, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.693, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.503, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.721, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 1971, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.466, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 1971, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.48, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.62, "year": 1971, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 1971, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1971, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.693, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.693, "year": 1971, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.503, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 1971, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.571, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 1971, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.68, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 1971, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.248, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.248, "year": 1971, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 1971, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b02896297e6b461ca919d5b44eb0347d", "name": "Poland 2007 parliamentary (overnight poland_2007_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://wybory2007.pkw.gov.pl/SJM/PL/WYN/P/{terr6}/{gmina6}_{obwod}.htm", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"obwod": "obwod", "PPP": "PPP", "LPR": "LPR", "PiS": "PiS", "PO": "PO", "PSL": "PSL", "Samoobrona": "Samoobrona", "LiD": "LiD", "Partia_Kobiet": "Partia_Kobiet", "Samoobrona_Patriotyczna": "Samoobrona_Patriotyczna", "Mniejszosc_Niemiecka": "Mniejszosc_Niemiecka"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 25476, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 4555, "votes_gt_valid": 25476}, "n_stations_flagged": 25476, "created_at": "2026-06-25T12:52:09.831129", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.917, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.911, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.874, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.803, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.911, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.398, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.083, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.083, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 25476}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bee8cc89fc58492da5c940f7a4f69a81", "name": "Italy 2006 parliamentary (camera dei deputati) (overnight italy_2006_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://elezionistorico.interno.gov.it/daithome/documenti/opendata/camera/camera-20060409.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ALLEANZA LOMBARDA AUTONOMIA": "ALLEANZA LOMBARDA AUTONOMIA", "ALLEANZA NAZIONALE": "ALLEANZA NAZIONALE", "ALTERNATIVA SOCIALE MUSSOLINI": "ALTERNATIVA SOCIALE MUSSOLINI", "AMBIENTA-LISTA": "AMBIENTA-LISTA", "COMUNISTI ITALIANI": "COMUNISTI ITALIANI", "DEM.CRIST.-NUOVO PSI": "DEM.CRIST.-NUOVO PSI", "DESTRA NAZIONALE": "DESTRA NAZIONALE", "DI PIETRO ITALIA DEI VALORI": "DI PIETRO ITALIA DEI VALORI", "DIE FREIHEITLICHEN": "DIE FREIHEITLICHEN", "DIMENSIONE CHRISTIANA": "DIMENSIONE CHRISTIANA", "FEDERAZIONE DEI VERDI": "FEDERAZIONE DEI VERDI", "FIAMMA TRICOLORE": "FIAMMA TRICOLORE", "FORZA ITALIA": "FORZA ITALIA", "I SOCIALISTI ": "I SOCIALISTI ", "IRS": "IRS", "L'ULIVO": "L'ULIVO", "LA ROSA NEL PUGNO": "LA ROSA NEL PUGNO", "LEGA NORD": "LEGA NORD", "LEGA SUD": "LEGA SUD", "LIGA FRONTE VENETO": "LIGA FRONTE VENETO", "LISTA CONSUMATORI": "LISTA CONSUMATORI", "MOV.DEM.SIC-NOI SIC.": "MOV.DEM.SIC-NOI SIC.", "MOVIMENTO TRIVENETO": "MOVIMENTO TRIVENETO", "NO EURO": "NO EURO", "P.LIBERALE ITALIANO": "P.LIBERALE ITALIANO", "PARTITO PENSIONATI": "PARTITO PENSIONATI", "PENSIONATI UNITI": "PENSIONATI UNITI", "PER IL SUD": "PER IL SUD", "PROGETTO NORDEST": "PROGETTO NORDEST", "RIFONDAZIONE COMUNISTA": "RIFONDAZIONE COMUNISTA", "S.O.S. ITALIA": "S.O.S. ITALIA", "SARDIGNA NATZIONE": "SARDIGNA NATZIONE", "SOLIDARIETA'": "SOLIDARIETA'", "SVP": "SVP", "TERZO POLO": "TERZO POLO", "U.D.EUR POPOLARI": "U.D.EUR POPOLARI", "UNIONE DI CENTRO": "UNIONE DI CENTRO", "AUT.LIB. DEMOCRATIE": "AUT.LIB. DEMOCRATIE", "FI-AN": "FI-AN", "LEGA NORD V.D'AOSTE": "LEGA NORD V.D'AOSTE", "VALLEE D'AOSTE": "VALLEE D'AOSTE"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8101, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-06-25T12:42:24.388944", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.57, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.852, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.775, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.57, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.313, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.694, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.62, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.231, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.231, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8101}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "777e1cdccace438e8caf33dafcdd9113", "name": "St. Vincent and the Grenadines 1957 parliamentary (overnight st_vincent_and_grenadines_1957_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines", "year": 1957, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/EVLMHZ (Cox-Lijphart Archive Dataverse; file Stvincent57.csv, datafile id 690340)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PPP_Peoples_Political_Party": "PPP_Peoples_Political_Party", "SVLP_Saint_Vincent_Labour_Party": "SVLP_Saint_Vincent_Labour_Party", "PLM_Peoples_Liberation_Movement": "PLM_Peoples_Liberation_Movement", "Independent_1": "Independent_1", "Independent_2": "Independent_2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T12:41:58.548191", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6d9b7baf4e9549828da3f269325911f4", "name": "Turkey 2015 parliamentary (overnight turkey_2015nov_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Turkey", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://acikveri.ysk.gov.tr/ (YSK Open Data Portal API getSecimSandikSonucList; secimId=14868 = 26.D\u00f6nem 1 Kas\u0131m 2015 Milletvekili Genel Se\u00e7imi)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"il_ID": "il_ID", "ilce_ID": "ilce_ID", "sandik_ID": "sandik_ID", "M\u0130LLET": "M\u0130LLET", "VATAN PART\u0130S\u0130": "VATAN PART\u0130S\u0130", "CHP": "CHP", "SAADET": "SAADET", "DSP": "DSP", "DP": "DP", "BTP": "BTP", "MHP": "MHP", "HKP": "HKP", "LDP": "LDP", "HDP": "HDP", "BBP": "BBP", "AK PART\u0130": "AK PART\u0130", "KP": "KP", "HAK-PAR": "HAK-PAR", "DYP": "DYP", "BAGIMSIZ": "BAGIMSIZ"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 174992, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2775, "registered_not_positive": 8, "votes_gt_valid": 174992}, "n_stations_flagged": 174992, "created_at": "2026-06-25T12:20:42.591485", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.606, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.425, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.388, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.23, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.606, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.425, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.139, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.465, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.236, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.352, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.129, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.282, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.388, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.23, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.23, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.292, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.78, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.352, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.352, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Justice and Development Party (AK)", "winner_candidate": "Recep Tayyip Erdo\u011fan", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Joint candidate of several (heterogeneous) opposition parties", "margin": 13.35, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "TUR", "year": 2014, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 174992}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "10c39bf47b934ecf9e7a142234b17c6b", "name": "Greece 2015 parliamentary (overnight greece_2015jan_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Greece", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ekloges-prev.singularlogic.eu/v2015a/dyn/v/den_<id>.js (Greek Ministry of Interior / SingularLogic results backend)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"den_id": "den_id", "dhm_id": "dhm_id", "ep_id": "ep_id", "n_tm": "n_tm", "\"\u03a1\u039f \u039c\u0391\" \u03a1\u0399\u0396\u039f\u03a3\u03a0\u0391\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039f\u03a1\u0398\u039f\u0394\u039f\u039e\u039f \u039c\u0395\u03a4\u03a9\u03a0\u039f \u0391\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039b\u0395\u0393\u0393\u03a5\u0397\u03a3": "\"\u03a1\u039f \u039c\u0391\" \u03a1\u0399\u0396\u039f\u03a3\u03a0\u0391\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039f\u03a1\u0398\u039f\u0394\u039f\u039e\u039f \u039c\u0395\u03a4\u03a9\u03a0\u039f \u0391\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039b\u0395\u0393\u0393\u03a5\u0397\u03a3", "\u0391\u039d_\u0391\u039d_\u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4_, \u0391\u039d_\u0394\u0395\u039e\u0399\u0391, \u0391\u039d_\u03a0\u0391\u03a3\u039f\u039a, \u0391\u039d_\u039d_\u0394_, \u039f\u03a7\u0399 \u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u039d \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0395\u039c\u039f \u039a_ \u0395\u03a0\u0399\u03a7_\u03a7\u0391\u03a1_\u039f\u0399\u039a_\u03a7\u0391\u03a1_\u03a7\u03a1\u0395\u0397 \u03a3\u03a9\u0396\u03a9 \u0396\u03a9\u0395\u03a3 \u03a0\u0391\u039d_\u0395\u03a1\u0393_\u039a\u0399\u039d_\u0395\u039b\u039b_ \u03a0\u0391_\u0395_\u039a_\u0395_": "\u0391\u039d_\u0391\u039d_\u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4_, \u0391\u039d_\u0394\u0395\u039e\u0399\u0391, \u0391\u039d_\u03a0\u0391\u03a3\u039f\u039a, \u0391\u039d_\u039d_\u0394_, \u039f\u03a7\u0399 \u03a3\u03a4\u039f\u039d \u03a0\u039f\u039b\u0395\u039c\u039f \u039a_ \u0395\u03a0\u0399\u03a7_\u03a7\u0391\u03a1_\u039f\u0399\u039a_\u03a7\u0391\u03a1_\u03a7\u03a1\u0395\u0397 \u03a3\u03a9\u0396\u03a9 \u0396\u03a9\u0395\u03a3 \u03a0\u0391\u039d_\u0395\u03a1\u0393_\u039a\u0399\u039d_\u0395\u039b\u039b_ \u03a0\u0391_\u0395_\u039a_\u0395_", "\u0391\u039d\u03a4\u03b9\u03ba\u03b1\u03c0\u03b9\u03c4\u03b1\u03bb\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae \u0391\u03a1\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03c1\u03ae \u03a3\u03a5\u03bd\u03b5\u03c1\u03b3\u03b1\u03c3\u03af\u03b1 \u03b3\u03b9\u03b1 \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u0391\u03bd\u03b1\u03c4\u03c1\u03bf\u03c0\u03ae  \u039c_\u0391\u03a1_\u03a3": "\u0391\u039d\u03a4\u03b9\u03ba\u03b1\u03c0\u03b9\u03c4\u03b1\u03bb\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b9\u03ba\u03ae \u0391\u03a1\u03b9\u03c3\u03c4\u03b5\u03c1\u03ae \u03a3\u03a5\u03bd\u03b5\u03c1\u03b3\u03b1\u03c3\u03af\u03b1 \u03b3\u03b9\u03b1 \u03c4\u03b7\u03bd \u0391\u03bd\u03b1\u03c4\u03c1\u03bf\u03c0\u03ae  \u039c_\u0391\u03a1_\u03a3", "\u0391\u03bd\u03b5\u03be__\u039c\u03b5\u03bc\u03bf\u03bd\u03c9\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9 \u03a5\u03c0\u03bf\u03c8\u03ae\u03c6\u03b9\u03bf\u03b9": "\u0391\u03bd\u03b5\u03be__\u039c\u03b5\u03bc\u03bf\u03bd\u03c9\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03bf\u03b9 \u03a5\u03c0\u03bf\u03c8\u03ae\u03c6\u03b9\u03bf\u03b9", "\u0391\u03bd\u03b5\u03be\u03ac\u03c1\u03c4\u03b7\u03c4\u03bf\u03b9 \u0395\u03bb\u03bb\u03b7\u03bd\u03b5\u03c2 \u0395\u03b8\u03bd_\u03a0\u03b1\u03c4\u03c1_\u03a3\u03c5\u03bc_,\u0391\u039a\u039a\u0395\u039b,\u039b\u0395\u03a5\u039a\u039f,\u03a0\u03c5\u03c1_\u0395\u03bb\u03bb_,\u03a7\u03c1_\u039a\u03bf\u03bc_\u0395\u03bb\u03bb_,\u0391\u03bd_\u0395\u03bb_ \u03a0_\u039a\u03b1\u03bc\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03bf\u03c2": "\u0391\u03bd\u03b5\u03be\u03ac\u03c1\u03c4\u03b7\u03c4\u03bf\u03b9 \u0395\u03bb\u03bb\u03b7\u03bd\u03b5\u03c2 \u0395\u03b8\u03bd_\u03a0\u03b1\u03c4\u03c1_\u03a3\u03c5\u03bc_,\u0391\u039a\u039a\u0395\u039b,\u039b\u0395\u03a5\u039a\u039f,\u03a0\u03c5\u03c1_\u0395\u03bb\u03bb_,\u03a7\u03c1_\u039a\u03bf\u03bc_\u0395\u03bb\u03bb_,\u0391\u03bd_\u0395\u03bb_ \u03a0_\u039a\u03b1\u03bc\u03bc\u03ad\u03bd\u03bf\u03c2", "\u0395\u0395\u039a \u03a4\u03a1\u039f\u03a4\u03a3\u039a\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u03a3 - \u0395\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u0395\u03a0\u0391\u039d\u0391\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391": "\u0395\u0395\u039a \u03a4\u03a1\u039f\u03a4\u03a3\u039a\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u03a3 - \u0395\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u0395\u03a0\u0391\u039d\u0391\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391", "\u0395\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039d\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u0397 \u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u0391\u03a0\u0395\u039b\u0395\u03a5\u0398\u0395\u03a1\u03a9\u03a3\u0397 (\u0395\u039b_\u039b\u0391_\u0394_\u0391_)": "\u0395\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039d\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u0397 \u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u0391\u03a0\u0395\u039b\u0395\u03a5\u0398\u0395\u03a1\u03a9\u03a3\u0397 (\u0395\u039b_\u039b\u0391_\u0394_\u0391_)", "\u0395\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039b\u0395\u03a5\u039a\u039f \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u03a3\u0397\u039c\u0395\u03a1\u0399\u039d\u0397\u03a3 \u0399\u0394\u0395\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u0399\u0391\u03a3 (\u0395_\u039b_\u039a_\u03a3_\u0399_)": "\u0395\u039b\u039b\u0397\u039d\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039b\u0395\u03a5\u039a\u039f \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u03a3\u0397\u039c\u0395\u03a1\u0399\u039d\u0397\u03a3 \u0399\u0394\u0395\u039f\u039b\u039f\u0393\u0399\u0391\u03a3 (\u0395_\u039b_\u039a_\u03a3_\u0399_)", "\u0395\u039d\u03a9\u03a3\u0397 \u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397\u03a3 \u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u0397\u03a3 \u039c\u0395\u03a4\u0391\u03a1\u03a1\u03a5\u0398\u039c\u0399\u03a3\u0397\u03a3 (\u0395_\u0394_\u0395_\u039c_)": "\u0395\u039d\u03a9\u03a3\u0397 \u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397\u03a3 \u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u0397\u03a3 \u039c\u0395\u03a4\u0391\u03a1\u03a1\u03a5\u0398\u039c\u0399\u03a3\u0397\u03a3 (\u0395_\u0394_\u0395_\u039c_)", "\u0395\u03bd\u03c9\u03c3\u03b7 \u039a\u03b5\u03bd\u03c4\u03c1\u03ce\u03c9\u03bd": "\u0395\u03bd\u03c9\u03c3\u03b7 \u039a\u03b5\u03bd\u03c4\u03c1\u03ce\u03c9\u03bd", "\u039a_\u0395_\u0391\u039d_ \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u0397\u03a3 \u0391\u039d\u03a4\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3\u0397\u03a3": "\u039a_\u0395_\u0391\u039d_ \u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u039a\u0397\u03a3 \u0391\u039d\u03a4\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0391\u03a3\u0397\u03a3", "\u039a_\u039a_\u0395_ - \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u039f\u03a5\u039d\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 \u0395\u039b\u039b\u0391\u0394\u0391\u03a3": "\u039a_\u039a_\u0395_ - \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u039f\u03a5\u039d\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u039f \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u0391 \u0395\u039b\u039b\u0391\u0394\u0391\u03a3", "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u03a9\u039d \u03a3\u039f\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u039b\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u03a9\u039d": "\u039a\u0399\u039d\u0397\u039c\u0391 \u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u03a9\u039d \u03a3\u039f\u03a3\u0399\u0391\u039b\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u03a9\u039d", "\u039a\u039a\u0395 (\u03bc-\u03bb) - \u039c-\u039b \u039a\u039a\u0395 \u0395\u039a\u039b\u039f\u0393\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0395\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u0391": "\u039a\u039a\u0395 (\u03bc-\u03bb) - \u039c-\u039b \u039a\u039a\u0395 \u0395\u039a\u039b\u039f\u0393\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0395\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u0391", "\u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u039f\u03a1\u0398\u039f\u0394\u039f\u039e\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0395\u03a1\u039c\u039f\u03a3 (\u039b\u0391_\u039f_\u03a3_)": "\u039b\u0391\u03aa\u039a\u039f\u03a3 \u039f\u03a1\u0398\u039f\u0394\u039f\u039e\u039f\u03a3 \u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u0393\u0395\u03a1\u039c\u039f\u03a3 (\u039b\u0391_\u039f_\u03a3_)", "\u039b\u03b1\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc\u03c2 \u03a3\u03cd\u03bd\u03b4\u03b5\u03c3\u03bc\u03bf\u03c2 - \u03a7\u03c1\u03c5\u03c3\u03ae \u0391\u03c5\u03b3\u03ae": "\u039b\u03b1\u03b9\u03ba\u03cc\u03c2 \u03a3\u03cd\u03bd\u03b4\u03b5\u03c3\u03bc\u03bf\u03c2 - \u03a7\u03c1\u03c5\u03c3\u03ae \u0391\u03c5\u03b3\u03ae", "\u039d\u0395\u0391 \u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u0391": "\u039d\u0395\u0391 \u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u0391", "\u039f\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u039d\u03a9\u03a3\u0397 \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u039f\u03a5\u039d\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u03a9\u039d \u0394\u0399\u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u03a9\u039d \u0395\u039b\u039b\u0391\u0394\u0391\u03a3": "\u039f\u03a1\u0393\u0391\u039d\u03a9\u03a3\u0397 \u039a\u039f\u039c\u039c\u039f\u03a5\u039d\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u03a9\u039d \u0394\u0399\u0395\u0398\u039d\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u03a9\u039d \u0395\u039b\u039b\u0391\u0394\u0391\u03a3", "\u03a0\u0391_\u03a3\u039f_\u039a": "\u03a0\u0391_\u03a3\u039f_\u039a", "\u03a0\u03a1\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u039d\u039f\u0399 - \u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u03a1\u0391": "\u03a0\u03a1\u0391\u03a3\u0399\u039d\u039f\u0399 - \u0394\u0397\u039c\u039f\u039a\u03a1\u0391\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397 \u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u03a1\u0391", "\u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u03a3\u03a0\u0399\u03a3\u039c\u039f\u03a3 \u03a1\u0399\u0396\u039f\u03a3\u03a0\u0391\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397\u03a3 \u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u03a1\u0391\u03a3-\u03a3\u03a5\u03a1\u0399\u0396\u0391": "\u03a3\u03a5\u039d\u0391\u03a3\u03a0\u0399\u03a3\u039c\u039f\u03a3 \u03a1\u0399\u0396\u039f\u03a3\u03a0\u0391\u03a3\u03a4\u0399\u039a\u0397\u03a3 \u0391\u03a1\u0399\u03a3\u03a4\u0395\u03a1\u0391\u03a3-\u03a3\u03a5\u03a1\u0399\u0396\u0391", "\u03a4\u039f \u03a0\u039f\u03a4\u0391\u039c\u0399": "\u03a4\u039f \u03a0\u039f\u03a4\u0391\u039c\u0399", "\u03a4\u03b5\u03bb\u03b5\u03af\u03b1 - \u0391\u03c0\u03cc\u03c3\u03c4\u03bf\u03bb\u03bf\u03c2 \u0393\u03ba\u03bb\u03ad\u03c4\u03c3\u03bf\u03c2": "\u03a4\u03b5\u03bb\u03b5\u03af\u03b1 - \u0391\u03c0\u03cc\u03c3\u03c4\u03bf\u03bb\u03bf\u03c2 \u0393\u03ba\u03bb\u03ad\u03c4\u03c3\u03bf\u03c2"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1035, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1000, "votes_gt_valid": 1035}, "n_stations_flagged": 1035, "created_at": "2026-06-25T10:21:14.388884", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.932, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.962, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.88, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.785, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.962, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.753, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.105, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.526, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.785, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.145, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.145, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1035}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f37aed21211c4563971da80da675b044", "name": "Bhutan 2024 parliamentary (overnight bhutan_2024_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bhutan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.ecb.bt/geresults2024/ (20 official ECB per-dzongkhag result PDFs, e.g. https://www.ecb.bt/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Thimphu.pdf)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PDP": "PDP", "BTP": "BTP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 46, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T10:21:01.005935", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.709, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.88, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.565, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.457, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.807, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.454, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.154, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.232, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.565, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.565, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.457, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.478, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.478, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.148, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.148, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 46}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6e1aa60b2b794441b729214551e81dcb", "name": "Palestine 2006 parliamentary (overnight palestine_2006_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Palestine", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electiondataarchive.org/data-and-documentation/clea-lower-chamber-elections-archive/ (CLEA Lower Chamber Release 18, 2025-10-15; file clea_lc_20251015.dta; Palestine ctr 2006)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Change and Reform": "Change and Reform", "Fateh Movement": "Fateh Movement", "Independent": "Independent", "Martyr Abu Ali Mustafa": "Martyr Abu Ali Mustafa", "The Popular Struggle Front": "The Popular Struggle Front", "Popular Front For The Liberation Of Palestine": "Popular Front For The Liberation Of Palestine", "The Alternative": "The Alternative", "The Arab Palestinian Front": "The Arab Palestinian Front", "The Palestinian Democratic Union": "The Palestinian Democratic Union", "The Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine": "The Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 16, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 16, "registered_not_positive": 16}, "n_stations_flagged": 16, "created_at": "2026-06-25T10:20:55.564336", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 16}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "84a35c82238e4175865b904cc5dec806", "name": "Namibia 2019 - National Assembly per-constituency", "metadata": {"country": "Namibia", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Namibia 2019 National Assembly (closed-list nationwide PR), per CONSTITUENCY (122 units, 15 region labels). Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/FXKZLF, na_1989-2019.rds (long format, pivoted to wide). registered=registered_voters, cast=votes_cast, valid=valid_votes, invalid=rejected_votes. Per-party votes sum EXACTLY to valid (gap 0).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_app": "All People's Party", "votes_cdv": "Christian Democratic Voice", "votes_cod": "Congress of Democrats", "votes_lpm": "Landless People's Movement", "votes_ndp": "National Democratic Party of Namibia", "votes_neff": "Namibia Economic Freedom Fighters", "votes_npf": "National Patriotic Front of Namibia", "votes_nudo": "National Unity Democratic Organisation", "votes_pdm": "Democratic Turnhalle Alliance / Popular Democratic Movement", "votes_rdp": "Rally for Democracy and Progress", "votes_rp": "Republican Party", "votes_swanu": "South West Africa National Union", "votes_swapo": "Suidwes-Afrikaanse Volks Organisasie", "votes_udf": "United Democratic Front", "votes_wrp": "Workers Revolutionary Party / Communist Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 122, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 3, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:34:21.835180", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.395, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.348, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.647, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.512, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.395, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.348, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.104, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.054, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.513, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.478, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.276, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.703, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.426, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.647, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.262, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.262, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.816, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 122}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "aa09ab12bb404785b71db74dd7a8d09b", "name": "Namibia 2014 - National Assembly per-constituency", "metadata": {"country": "Namibia", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Namibia 2014 National Assembly (closed-list nationwide PR), per CONSTITUENCY (122 units, 15 region labels). Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/FXKZLF, na_1989-2019.rds (long format, pivoted to wide). registered=registered_voters, cast=votes_cast, valid=valid_votes, invalid=rejected_votes. Per-party votes sum EXACTLY to valid (gap 0).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_app": "All People's Party", "votes_cdv": "Christian Democratic Voice", "votes_cod": "Congress of Democrats", "votes_dpn": "Democratic Party of Namibia", "votes_dta": "Democratic Turnhalle Alliance / Popular Democratic Movement", "votes_mag": "Monitor Action Group", "votes_ndp": "National Democratic Party of Namibia", "votes_neff": "Namibia Economic Freedom Fighters", "votes_nudo": "National Unity Democratic Organisation", "votes_rdp": "Rally for Democracy and Progress", "votes_rp": "Republican Party", "votes_swanu": "South West Africa National Union", "votes_swapo": "Suidwes-Afrikaanse Volks Organisasie", "votes_udf": "United Democratic Front", "votes_upm": "United People's Movement", "votes_wrp": "Workers Revolutionary Party / Communist Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 122, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 9, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 9, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:33:08.147657", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.295, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.654, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.656, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.542, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.295, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.535, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.652, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.663, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.706, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.115, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.388, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.656, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.542, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.542, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.437, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.19, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.19, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "SWAPO", "winner_candidate": "Hage Geingob", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "DTA", "margin": 81.76, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "NAM", "year": 2014, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 122}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "12d94b56f1b1484c8000647a4917bb43", "name": "Venezuela 2024 \u2014 Presidential per-mesa (25K)", "metadata": {"country": "Venezuela", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Venezuela 2024 presidential, per MESA (25,100 mesas, 24 estados). Source: Harvard Dataverse VENPRES-A (doi:10.7910/DVN/NO1XJ2), ven_elec_2006_2024.tab. Vote blocs: Oficialismo (govt) vs Oposici\u00f3n vs Otros. registered=rep_c, cast=totales_c, valid=validos, invalid=nulos. PROVENANCE: the CNE published NO mesa-level results for 28-Jul-2024; this layer is the reconstruction from opposition-collected actas (Gonz\u00e1lez ~67% / Maduro ~30%), the only mesa-level source \u2014 NOT the CNE's unevidenced 52% claim.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_oficialismo": "Nicol\u00e1s Maduro (Oficialismo)", "votes_oposicion": "Edmundo Gonz\u00e1lez (Oposici\u00f3n)", "votes_otros": "Otros (reportados)", "votes_otros_nc": "Otros no clasificados"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 25100, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:26:56.818624", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.117, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 0.535, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.196, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.046, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.117, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.029, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.227, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.108, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.027, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.171, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.662, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.225, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.196, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.196, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.046, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.046, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.094, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.094, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.335, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.016, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.211, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.211, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 25100}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "64bc7747b5c34938a5a80a536031b9c1", "name": "Venezuela 2018 \u2014 Presidential per-mesa (14K)", "metadata": {"country": "Venezuela", "year": 2018, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Venezuela 2018 presidential, per MESA (14,400 mesas, 24 estados). Source: Harvard Dataverse VENPRES-A (doi:10.7910/DVN/NO1XJ2), ven_elec_2006_2024.tab. Vote blocs: Oficialismo (govt) vs Oposici\u00f3n vs Otros. registered=rep_c, cast=totales_c, valid=validos, invalid=nulos. Opposition (MUD) boycotted \u2014 no unified opposition candidate.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_oficialismo": "Nicol\u00e1s Maduro (Oficialismo)", "votes_oposicion": "Oposici\u00f3n (sin candidato unificado)", "votes_otros": "Otros (reportados)", "votes_otros_nc": "Otros no clasificados"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14400, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:25:58.188207", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.574, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.426, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.213, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.061, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.574, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.143, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.426, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.356, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.167, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.059, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.015, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.213, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.053, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.117, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.279, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.213, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.213, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.122, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.122, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.362, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.362, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.019, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.019, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.234, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.234, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV)", "winner_candidate": "Nicol\u00e1s Maduro", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Progressive Advance (AP) and Movement for Socialism (MAS)", "margin": 46.91, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "VEN", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 14400}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ef4a0ebefc914707ba8f7ea914462579", "name": "Venezuela 2013 \u2014 Presidential per-mesa (13K)", "metadata": {"country": "Venezuela", "year": 2013, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Venezuela 2013 presidential, per MESA (13,681 mesas, 24 estados). Source: Harvard Dataverse VENPRES-A (doi:10.7910/DVN/NO1XJ2), ven_elec_2006_2024.tab. Vote blocs: Oficialismo (govt) vs Oposici\u00f3n vs Otros. registered=rep_c, cast=totales_c, valid=validos, invalid=nulos.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_oficialismo": "Nicol\u00e1s Maduro (Oficialismo)", "votes_oposicion": "Henrique Capriles (Oposici\u00f3n)", "votes_otros": "Otros (reportados)", "votes_otros_nc": "Otros no clasificados"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13681, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:25:10.846229", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.157, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.408, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.327, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.109, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.157, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.539, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.408, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.241, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.31, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.651, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.163, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.167, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.18, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.327, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.327, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.109, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.109, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.226, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.226, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.598, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.43, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.43, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Gran Polo Patriotico-Partido Socialista Unido de Venezuela (GPP-PSUV)", "winner_candidate": "Nicolas Maduro Moros", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Mesa de la Unidad Democratica (MUD)", "margin": 1.5, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "VEN", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 13681}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "defdca9014084c0d954121488686bf81", "name": "Venezuela 2012 \u2014 Presidential per-mesa (13K)", "metadata": {"country": "Venezuela", "year": 2012, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Venezuela 2012 presidential, per MESA (13,669 mesas, 24 estados). Source: Harvard Dataverse VENPRES-A (doi:10.7910/DVN/NO1XJ2), ven_elec_2006_2024.tab. Vote blocs: Oficialismo (govt) vs Oposici\u00f3n vs Otros. registered=rep_c, cast=totales_c, valid=validos, invalid=nulos.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_oficialismo": "Hugo Ch\u00e1vez (Oficialismo)", "votes_oposicion": "Henrique Capriles (Oposici\u00f3n)", "votes_otros": "Otros (reportados)", "votes_otros_nc": "Otros no clasificados"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13669, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 22}, "n_stations_flagged": 22, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:24:24.405064", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.413, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.01, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.399, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.145, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.413, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.01, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.082, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.52, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.437, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.359, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.185, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.296, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.18, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.399, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.399, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.145, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.145, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.268, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.268, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.672, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.046, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.046, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.571, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Gran Polo Patriotico-Partido Socialista Unido de Venezuela (GPP-PSUV)", "winner_candidate": "Hugo Chavez Frias", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Mesa de la Unidad Democratica (MUD)", "margin": 10.76, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "VEN", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 13669}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b5962ffadbb6417691000b91d7ebfbc2", "name": "Venezuela 2006 \u2014 Presidential per-mesa (10K)", "metadata": {"country": "Venezuela", "year": 2006, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Venezuela 2006 presidential, per MESA (10,887 mesas, 24 estados). Source: Harvard Dataverse VENPRES-A (doi:10.7910/DVN/NO1XJ2), ven_elec_2006_2024.tab. Vote blocs: Oficialismo (govt) vs Oposici\u00f3n vs Otros. registered=rep_c, cast=totales_c, valid=validos, invalid=nulos.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_oficialismo": "Hugo Ch\u00e1vez (Oficialismo)", "votes_oposicion": "Manuel Rosales (Oposici\u00f3n)", "votes_otros": "Otros (reportados)", "votes_otros_nc": "Otros no clasificados"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10887, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 38}, "n_stations_flagged": 38, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:23:45.913890", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.869, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.023, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.45, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.168, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.869, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.023, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.348, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.668, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.417, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.434, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.358, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.5, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.375, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.45, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.45, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.168, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.168, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.314, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.314, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.709, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.044, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.044, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.628, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Movimiento V Rep\u00fablica (MVR)", "winner_candidate": "Hugo Rafael Ch\u00e1vez Fr\u00edas", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Un Nuevo Tiempo (UNT)", "margin": 25.94, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "VEN", "year": 2006, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10887}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cce747b8d17f4586a2747994011353fb", "name": "Namibia 2009 - National Assembly per-constituency", "metadata": {"country": "Namibia", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Namibia 2009 National Assembly (closed-list nationwide PR), per CONSTITUENCY (108 units, 14 region labels). Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/FXKZLF, na_1989-2019.rds (long format, pivoted to wide). registered=registered_voters, cast=votes_cast, valid=valid_votes, invalid=rejected_votes. Per-party votes sum EXACTLY to valid (gap 0).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_app": "All People's Party", "votes_cod": "Congress of Democrats", "votes_cp": "Workers Revolutionary Party / Communist Party", "votes_dpn": "Democratic Party of Namibia", "votes_dta": "Democratic Turnhalle Alliance / Popular Democratic Movement", "votes_mag": "Monitor Action Group", "votes_ndmc": "Namibia Democratic Movement for Change", "votes_ndp": "National Democratic Party of Namibia", "votes_nudo": "National Unity Democratic Organisation", "votes_rdp": "Rally for Democracy and Progress", "votes_rp": "Republican Party", "votes_swanu": "South West Africa National Union", "votes_swapo": "Suidwes-Afrikaanse Volks Organisasie", "votes_udf": "United Democratic Front"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 108, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1, "cast_gt_registered": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:23:38.746020", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.033, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.361, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.655, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.541, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.033, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.758, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.361, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.106, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.487, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.647, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.662, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.296, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.655, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.541, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.541, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.433, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.433, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.19, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.19, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "SWAPO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "RDP", "margin": 72.18, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "NAM", "year": 2009, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 108}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e9f7cc64518c4e568f3ff874f9e8b3b1", "name": "Namibia 2004 - National Assembly per-constituency", "metadata": {"country": "Namibia", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Namibia 2004 National Assembly (closed-list nationwide PR), per CONSTITUENCY (107 units, 13 region labels). Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/FXKZLF, na_1989-2019.rds (long format, pivoted to wide). registered=registered_voters, cast=votes_cast, valid=valid_votes, invalid=rejected_votes. Per-party votes sum EXACTLY to valid (gap 0).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_cod": "Congress of Democrats", "votes_dta": "Democratic Turnhalle Alliance / Popular Democratic Movement", "votes_mag": "Monitor Action Group", "votes_ndmc": "Namibia Democratic Movement for Change", "votes_nudo": "National Unity Democratic Organisation", "votes_rp": "Republican Party", "votes_swanu": "South West Africa National Union", "votes_swapo": "Suidwes-Afrikaanse Volks Organisasie", "votes_udf": "United Democratic Front"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 107, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:23:36.253438", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.199, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.542, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.654, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.537, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.542, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.429, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.253, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.457, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.654, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.537, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.431, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.19, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.19, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "SWAPO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "CoD", "margin": 68.96, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "NAM", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 107}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6a0fbf56dc424fa487b746c011503ea1", "name": "Namibia 1999 - National Assembly per-constituency", "metadata": {"country": "Namibia", "year": 1999, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Namibia 1999 National Assembly (closed-list nationwide PR), per CONSTITUENCY (102 units, 13 region labels). Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/FXKZLF, na_1989-2019.rds (long format, pivoted to wide). registered=registered_voters, cast=votes_cast, valid=valid_votes, invalid=rejected_votes. Per-party votes sum EXACTLY to valid (gap 0).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_cod": "Congress of Democrats", "votes_dcn": "Democratic Coalition of Namibia", "votes_dta": "Democratic Turnhalle Alliance / Popular Democratic Movement", "votes_fcn": "Federal Convention of Namibia", "votes_mag": "Monitor Action Group", "votes_swanu": "South West Africa National Union", "votes_swapo": "Suidwes-Afrikaanse Volks Organisasie", "votes_udf": "United Democratic Front"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 102, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:23:33.807238", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.207, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.975, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.669, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.55, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.975, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.514, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.139, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.462, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.55, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.434, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.19, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.19, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "SWAPO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "CoD", "margin": 67.0, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "NAM", "year": 1999, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 102}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1b28c651857a4ba4bf57261bf6d0deb2", "name": "Namibia 1994 - National Assembly per-district", "metadata": {"country": "Namibia", "year": 1994, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Namibia 1994 National Assembly (closed-list nationwide PR), per DISTRICT (13 units, 13 region labels). Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/FXKZLF, na_1989-2019.rds (long format, pivoted to wide). registered=registered_voters, cast=votes_cast, valid=valid_votes, invalid=rejected_votes. Per-party votes sum EXACTLY to valid (gap 0). 1989-1994 vintage: source reports this cycle only at the REGION level (no constituency_id), so granularity=region; sub_region duplicates region.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_dcn": "Democratic Coalition of Namibia", "votes_dta": "Democratic Turnhalle Alliance / Popular Democratic Movement", "votes_fcn": "Federal Convention of Namibia", "votes_mag": "Monitor Action Group", "votes_swanu": "South West Africa National Union", "votes_swapo": "Suidwes-Afrikaanse Volks Organisasie", "votes_udf": "United Democratic Front", "votes_wrp": "Workers Revolutionary Party / Communist Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:23:31.669584", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.274, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.706, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.587, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.487, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.274, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.706, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.242, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.56, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.587, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.487, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.487, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.384, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.384, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.19, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.19, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "SWAPO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "DTA", "margin": 51.0, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "NAM", "year": 1994, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 13}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c5b4e8d5031744f29d4d1cc811a8d2b3", "name": "Namibia 1989 - National Assembly per-constituency", "metadata": {"country": "Namibia", "year": 1989, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Namibia 1989 National Assembly (closed-list nationwide PR), per CONSTITUENCY (23 units, 1 region labels). Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/FXKZLF, na_1989-2019.rds (long format, pivoted to wide). registered=registered_voters, cast=votes_cast, valid=valid_votes, invalid=rejected_votes. Per-party votes sum EXACTLY to valid (gap 0). registered/region NOT in source for 1989 (founding UN-supervised election) -> registered=0 synthetic, region blank; cast/valid/invalid and per-party votes are real.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_acn": "National Christian Action (Asie Christelik Nasionaal)", "votes_cda": "Christian Democratic Action for Social Justice", "votes_dta": "Democratic Turnhalle Alliance / Popular Democratic Movement", "votes_fcn": "Federal Convention of Namibia", "votes_nndp": "Namibia National Democratic Party", "votes_nnf": "Namibia National Front", "votes_npf": "National Patriotic Front of Namibia", "votes_swapo": "Suidwes-Afrikaanse Volks Organisasie", "votes_swapo_d": "Swapo-Democrats", "votes_udf": "United Democratic Front"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 23, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 23, "cast_gt_registered": 23}, "n_stations_flagged": 23, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:23:29.496189", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.193, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.701, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.184, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.105, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.193, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 1989, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.701, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.725, "year": 1989, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.465, "year": 1989, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.548, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 1989, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.003, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 1989, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.153, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 1989, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.184, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.105, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.105, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.052, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.052, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.306, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 1989, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 1989, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.36, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.36, "year": 1989, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 1989, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 23}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "afb477836db6499587b973500f79bbe9", "name": "Malaysia 2022 (GE-15) - Federal parliamentary by constituency", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia GE-15 (2022) Dewan Rakyat (federal House) results at PARLIAMENTARY-SEAT (constituency) granularity - 222 single-member FPTP seats across 16 states/territories. NOT polling-station level (the federal file is seat-level). Source: Harvard Dataverse Malaysian Election Corpus (doi:10.7910/DVN/O4CRXK), federal_ballots.parquet + federal_stats.parquet. Candidates pivoted wide by PARTY (votes_<party>); a party appearing twice in a seat (independents) is summed. registered=voters_total, cast=ballots_issued, valid=votes_valid, invalid=votes_rejected. Ballot votes sum EXACTLY to votes_valid (gap=0). Uncontested seats have cast/valid=0 in source (kept, not fabricated).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_amanah": "AMANAH - National Trust Party", "votes_bebas": "BEBAS - Independent", "votes_berjasa": "BERJASA - Malaysian Islamic Justice Party", "votes_bersatu": "BERSATU - Malaysian United Indigenous Party", "votes_dap": "DAP - Democratic Action Party", "votes_gb": "GB - Nation's Vision", "votes_gerakan": "GERAKAN - Malaysian People's Movement Party", "votes_iman": "IMAN - National Indian Muslim Alliance Party", "votes_ipf": "IPF - All Malaysia Indian Progressive Front", "votes_kdm": "KDM - People's Solidarity Democracy Party", "votes_kimma": "KIMMA - Malaysian Indian Muslim Congress", "votes_mca": "MCA - Malaysian Chinese Association", "votes_mic": "MIC - Malaysian Indian Congress", "votes_mmsp": "MMSP - Malaysia Makkal Sakti Party", "votes_muda": "MUDA - Malaysian United Democratic Alliance", "votes_pas": "PAS - Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party", "votes_pbb": "PBB - Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu Sarawak", "votes_pbds": "PBDS - Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak", "votes_pbk": "PBK - Parti Bumi Kenyalang", "votes_pbm": "PBM - Malaysian Nation Party", "votes_pbrs": "PBRS - United Sabah People's Party", "votes_pbs": "PBS - Parti Bersatu Sabah", "votes_pcm": "PCM - Love Malaysia Party", "votes_pdp": "PDP - Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party", "votes_pejuang": "PEJUANG - Homeland Fighter's Party", "votes_pkr": "PKR - People's Justice Party", "votes_pprs": "PPRS - Sabah People's Unity Party", "votes_prm": "PRM - Malaysian People's Party", "votes_prs": "PRS - Sarawak People's Party", "votes_psb": "PSB - Sarawak United Party", "votes_psm": "PSM - Socialist Party of Malaysia", "votes_pur": "PUR - Parti Utama Rakyat", "votes_putra": "PUTRA - Malaysian Sovereign Bumiputera Party", "votes_sapp": "SAPP - Sabah Progressive Party", "votes_sedar": "SEDAR - Sarawak People's Consciousness Party", "votes_star": "STAR - Homeland Solidarity Party", "votes_supp": "SUPP - Sarawak United Peoples' Party", "votes_umno": "UMNO - United Malays National Organisation", "votes_upko": "UPKO - United Progressive Kinabalu Organisation", "votes_warisan": "WARISAN - Heritage Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 222, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 222}, "n_stations_flagged": 222, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:23:26.687114", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.615, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.647, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.459, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.316, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.615, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.647, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.21, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.012, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.561, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.39, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.226, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.343, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.343, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.368, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.615, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 222}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a58bd8d5904844d487cf126063d5f0c4", "name": "Malaysia 2018 (GE-14) - Federal parliamentary by constituency", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia GE-14 (2018) Dewan Rakyat (federal House) results at PARLIAMENTARY-SEAT (constituency) granularity - 222 single-member FPTP seats across 16 states/territories. NOT polling-station level (the federal file is seat-level). Source: Harvard Dataverse Malaysian Election Corpus (doi:10.7910/DVN/O4CRXK), federal_ballots.parquet + federal_stats.parquet. Candidates pivoted wide by PARTY (votes_<party>); a party appearing twice in a seat (independents) is summed. registered=voters_total, cast=ballots_issued, valid=votes_valid, invalid=votes_rejected. Ballot votes sum EXACTLY to votes_valid (gap=0). Uncontested seats have cast/valid=0 in source (kept, not fabricated).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_amanah": "AMANAH - National Trust Party", "votes_anak_negeri": "ANAK-NEGERI - Native Cooperation Party", "votes_bebas": "BEBAS - Independent", "votes_berjasa": "BERJASA - Malaysian Islamic Justice Party", "votes_bersatu": "BERSATU - Malaysian United Indigenous Party", "votes_dap": "DAP - Democratic Action Party", "votes_gerakan": "GERAKAN - Malaysian People's Movement Party", "votes_hr": "HR - Sabah People's Hope Party", "votes_ikatan": "IKATAN - Malaysian People's Unity Party", "votes_ldp": "LDP - Liberal Democratic Party", "votes_mca": "MCA - Malaysian Chinese Association", "votes_mic": "MIC - Malaysian Indian Congress", "votes_mup": "MUP - Malaysian United Party", "votes_myppp": "MYPPP - People's Progressive Party", "votes_pap": "PAP - People's Alternative Party", "votes_pas": "PAS - Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party", "votes_pbb": "PBB - Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu Sarawak", "votes_pbdsb": "PBDSB - New Sarawak Dayak People's Party", "votes_pbk": "PBK - Parti Bumi Kenyalang", "votes_pbrs": "PBRS - United Sabah People's Party", "votes_pbs": "PBS - Parti Bersatu Sabah", "votes_pcm": "PCM - Love Malaysia Party", "votes_pcs": "PCS - Parti Cinta Sabah", "votes_pdp": "PDP - Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party", "votes_peace": "PEACE - People's Alliance for Justice of Peace", "votes_pfp": "PFP - Penang Front Party", "votes_pkr": "PKR - People's Justice Party", "votes_pprs": "PPRS - Sabah People's Unity Party", "votes_prm": "PRM - Malaysian People's Party", "votes_prs": "PRS - Sarawak People's Party", "votes_psm": "PSM - Socialist Party of Malaysia", "votes_sapp": "SAPP - Sabah Progressive Party", "votes_star": "STAR - Homeland Solidarity Party", "votes_supp": "SUPP - Sarawak United Peoples' Party", "votes_umno": "UMNO - United Malays National Organisation", "votes_upko": "UPKO - United Progressive Kinabalu Organisation", "votes_warisan": "WARISAN - Heritage Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 222, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 222}, "n_stations_flagged": 222, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:23:23.805885", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.75, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.444, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.319, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.576, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.644, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.394, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.348, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.255, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.314, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.146, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.169, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.444, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.444, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.319, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.319, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.334, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.334, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.271, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.271, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.634, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.634, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 222}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a3aacb460483424f8b20cb9a27fc8d28", "name": "Malaysia 2013 (GE-13) - Federal parliamentary by constituency", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia GE-13 (2013) Dewan Rakyat (federal House) results at PARLIAMENTARY-SEAT (constituency) granularity - 222 single-member FPTP seats across 16 states/territories. NOT polling-station level (the federal file is seat-level). Source: Harvard Dataverse Malaysian Election Corpus (doi:10.7910/DVN/O4CRXK), federal_ballots.parquet + federal_stats.parquet. Candidates pivoted wide by PARTY (votes_<party>); a party appearing twice in a seat (independents) is summed. registered=voters_total, cast=ballots_issued, valid=votes_valid, invalid=votes_rejected. Ballot votes sum EXACTLY to votes_valid (gap=0). Uncontested seats have cast/valid=0 in source (kept, not fabricated).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bebas": "BEBAS - Independent", "votes_berjasa": "BERJASA - Malaysian Islamic Justice Party", "votes_bersama": "BERSAMA - Malaysia United People's Party", "votes_dap": "DAP - Democratic Action Party", "votes_gerakan": "GERAKAN - Malaysian People's Movement Party", "votes_kita": "KITA - People's Welfare Party", "votes_ldp": "LDP - Liberal Democratic Party", "votes_mca": "MCA - Malaysian Chinese Association", "votes_mic": "MIC - Malaysian Indian Congress", "votes_myppp": "MYPPP - People's Progressive Party", "votes_pas": "PAS - Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party", "votes_pbb": "PBB - Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu Sarawak", "votes_pbrs": "PBRS - United Sabah People's Party", "votes_pbs": "PBS - Parti Bersatu Sabah", "votes_pcm": "PCM - Love Malaysia Party", "votes_pkr": "PKR - People's Justice Party", "votes_prs": "PRS - Sarawak People's Party", "votes_psm": "PSM - Socialist Party of Malaysia", "votes_sapp": "SAPP - Sabah Progressive Party", "votes_spdp": "SPDP - Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party", "votes_star": "STAR - Homeland Solidarity Party", "votes_supp": "SUPP - Sarawak United Peoples' Party", "votes_swp": "SWP - Sarawak Workers Party", "votes_umno": "UMNO - United Malays National Organisation", "votes_upko": "UPKO - United Progressive Kinabalu Organisation"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 222, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 222}, "n_stations_flagged": 222, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:23:20.956445", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.086, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.004, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.321, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.206, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.086, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.452, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.613, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.333, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.333, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.177, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.11, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.698, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.174, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.321, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.321, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.206, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.206, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.225, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.225, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.615, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.578, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.578, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.574, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.315, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.315, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 222}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2074cb70966c484595dfd17837e68841", "name": "Malaysia 2008 (GE-12) - Federal parliamentary by constituency", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia GE-12 (2008) Dewan Rakyat (federal House) results at PARLIAMENTARY-SEAT (constituency) granularity - 222 single-member FPTP seats across 16 states/territories. NOT polling-station level (the federal file is seat-level). Source: Harvard Dataverse Malaysian Election Corpus (doi:10.7910/DVN/O4CRXK), federal_ballots.parquet + federal_stats.parquet. Candidates pivoted wide by PARTY (votes_<party>); a party appearing twice in a seat (independents) is summed. registered=voters_total, cast=ballots_issued, valid=votes_valid, invalid=votes_rejected. Ballot votes sum EXACTLY to votes_valid (gap=0). Uncontested seats have cast/valid=0 in source (kept, not fabricated).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bebas": "BEBAS - Independent", "votes_bersekutu": "BERSEKUTU - Federated Sabah People's Front", "votes_dap": "DAP - Democratic Action Party", "votes_gerakan": "GERAKAN - Malaysian People's Movement Party", "votes_ldp": "LDP - Liberal Democratic Party", "votes_mca": "MCA - Malaysian Chinese Association", "votes_mic": "MIC - Malaysian Indian Congress", "votes_myppp": "MYPPP - People's Progressive Party", "votes_pas": "PAS - Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party", "votes_pbb": "PBB - Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu Sarawak", "votes_pbrs": "PBRS - United Sabah People's Party", "votes_pbs": "PBS - Parti Bersatu Sabah", "votes_pkr": "PKR - People's Justice Party", "votes_prm": "PRM - Malaysian People's Party", "votes_prs": "PRS - Sarawak People's Party", "votes_psm": "PSM - Socialist Party of Malaysia", "votes_sapp": "SAPP - Sabah Progressive Party", "votes_snap": "SNAP - Sarawak National Party", "votes_spdp": "SPDP - Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party", "votes_supp": "SUPP - Sarawak United Peoples' Party", "votes_umno": "UMNO - United Malays National Organisation", "votes_upko": "UPKO - United Progressive Kinabalu Organisation"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 222, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 199}, "n_stations_flagged": 199, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:23:18.065114", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.273, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.896, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.328, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.216, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.273, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.568, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.454, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.177, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.11, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.596, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.149, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.328, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.216, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.216, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.236, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.236, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.635, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.594, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.594, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.328, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 222}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4a12dbd71a6f470b9aa5c3b40b4fd51c", "name": "Malaysia 2004 (GE-11) - Federal parliamentary by constituency", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia GE-11 (2004) Dewan Rakyat (federal House) results at PARLIAMENTARY-SEAT (constituency) granularity - 219 single-member FPTP seats across 16 states/territories. NOT polling-station level (the federal file is seat-level). Source: Harvard Dataverse Malaysian Election Corpus (doi:10.7910/DVN/O4CRXK), federal_ballots.parquet + federal_stats.parquet. Candidates pivoted wide by PARTY (votes_<party>); a party appearing twice in a seat (independents) is summed. registered=voters_total, cast=ballots_issued, valid=votes_valid, invalid=votes_rejected. Ballot votes sum EXACTLY to votes_valid (gap=0). Uncontested seats have cast/valid=0 in source (kept, not fabricated).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bebas": "BEBAS - Independent", "votes_dap": "DAP - Democratic Action Party", "votes_gerakan": "GERAKAN - Malaysian People's Movement Party", "votes_ldp": "LDP - Liberal Democratic Party", "votes_mca": "MCA - Malaysian Chinese Association", "votes_mdp": "MDP - Malaysian Democratic Party", "votes_mic": "MIC - Malaysian Indian Congress", "votes_myppp": "MYPPP - People's Progressive Party", "votes_pas": "PAS - Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party", "votes_pasok": "PASOK - United Pasok Nunukragang National Organisation", "votes_pbb": "PBB - Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu Sarawak", "votes_pbds": "PBDS - Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak", "votes_pbrs": "PBRS - United Sabah People's Party", "votes_pbs": "PBS - Parti Bersatu Sabah", "votes_pkr": "PKR - People's Justice Party", "votes_psm": "PSM - Socialist Party of Malaysia", "votes_sapp": "SAPP - Sabah Progressive Party", "votes_setia": "SETIA - United Democratic Sabah People's Power Party", "votes_snap": "SNAP - Sarawak National Party", "votes_spdp": "SPDP - Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party", "votes_star": "STAR - Homeland Solidarity Party", "votes_supp": "SUPP - Sarawak United Peoples' Party", "votes_umno": "UMNO - United Malays National Organisation", "votes_upko": "UPKO - United Progressive Kinabalu Organisation"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 219, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 162}, "n_stations_flagged": 162, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:23:14.808291", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.061, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.891, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.309, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.207, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.061, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.515, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.059, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.515, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.017, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.254, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.177, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.11, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.449, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.112, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.309, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.309, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.207, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.207, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.225, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.225, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.628, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.6, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.337, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.337, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 219}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8d42843604c34f478485a1e654074462", "name": "Malaysia 1999 (GE-10) - Federal parliamentary by constituency", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 1999, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia GE-10 (1999) Dewan Rakyat (federal House) results at PARLIAMENTARY-SEAT (constituency) granularity - 193 single-member FPTP seats across 15 states/territories. NOT polling-station level (the federal file is seat-level). Source: Harvard Dataverse Malaysian Election Corpus (doi:10.7910/DVN/O4CRXK), federal_ballots.parquet + federal_stats.parquet. Candidates pivoted wide by PARTY (votes_<party>); a party appearing twice in a seat (independents) is summed. registered=voters_total, cast=ballots_issued, valid=votes_valid, invalid=votes_rejected. Ballot votes sum EXACTLY to votes_valid (gap=0). Uncontested seats have cast/valid=0 in source (kept, not fabricated).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_akim": "AKIM - Malaysian People's Justice Front", "votes_bebas": "BEBAS - Independent", "votes_berjasa": "BERJASA - Malaysian Islamic Justice Party", "votes_dap": "DAP - Democratic Action Party", "votes_gerakan": "GERAKAN - Malaysian People's Movement Party", "votes_ldp": "LDP - Liberal Democratic Party", "votes_mca": "MCA - Malaysian Chinese Association", "votes_mdp": "MDP - Malaysian Democratic Party", "votes_mic": "MIC - Malaysian Indian Congress", "votes_pas": "PAS - Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party", "votes_pbb": "PBB - Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu Sarawak", "votes_pbds": "PBDS - Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak", "votes_pbrs": "PBRS - United Sabah People's Party", "votes_pbs": "PBS - Parti Bersatu Sabah", "votes_pkn": "PKN - National Justice Party", "votes_prm": "PRM - Malaysian People's Party", "votes_psm": "PSM - Socialist Party of Malaysia", "votes_sapp": "SAPP - Sabah Progressive Party", "votes_snap": "SNAP - Sarawak National Party", "votes_star": "STAR - Homeland Solidarity Party", "votes_supp": "SUPP - Sarawak United Peoples' Party", "votes_umno": "UMNO - United Malays National Organisation", "votes_upko": "UPKO - United Progressive Kinabalu Organisation"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 193, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 183}, "n_stations_flagged": 183, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:23:12.031566", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.529, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.287, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.266, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.162, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.529, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.382, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.287, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.602, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.401, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.216, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.454, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.266, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.266, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.162, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.162, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.207, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.207, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.557, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.198, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 193}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "153f9cfe7b2e44eebb83a20567087209", "name": "Malaysia 1995 (GE-09) - Federal parliamentary by constituency", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 1995, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia GE-09 (1995) Dewan Rakyat (federal House) results at PARLIAMENTARY-SEAT (constituency) granularity - 192 single-member FPTP seats across 15 states/territories. NOT polling-station level (the federal file is seat-level). Source: Harvard Dataverse Malaysian Election Corpus (doi:10.7910/DVN/O4CRXK), federal_ballots.parquet + federal_stats.parquet. Candidates pivoted wide by PARTY (votes_<party>); a party appearing twice in a seat (independents) is summed. registered=voters_total, cast=ballots_issued, valid=votes_valid, invalid=votes_rejected. Ballot votes sum EXACTLY to votes_valid (gap=0). Uncontested seats have cast/valid=0 in source (kept, not fabricated).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_akar": "AKAR - People's Justice Movement", "votes_akim": "AKIM - Malaysian People's Justice Front", "votes_bebas": "BEBAS - Independent", "votes_dap": "DAP - Democratic Action Party", "votes_gerakan": "GERAKAN - Malaysian People's Movement Party", "votes_ldp": "LDP - Liberal Democratic Party", "votes_mca": "MCA - Malaysian Chinese Association", "votes_mic": "MIC - Malaysian Indian Congress", "votes_pas": "PAS - Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party", "votes_pbb": "PBB - Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu Sarawak", "votes_pbds": "PBDS - Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak", "votes_pbrs": "PBRS - United Sabah People's Party", "votes_pbs": "PBS - Parti Bersatu Sabah", "votes_pds": "PDS - Democratic Sabah Party", "votes_prm": "PRM - Malaysian People's Party", "votes_s46": "S46 - Spirit of 46 Malay Party", "votes_sapp": "SAPP - Sabah Progressive Party", "votes_snap": "SNAP - Sarawak National Party", "votes_supp": "SUPP - Sarawak United Peoples' Party", "votes_umno": "UMNO - United Malays National Organisation"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 192, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 178}, "n_stations_flagged": 178, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:23:09.245794", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.513, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.464, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.258, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.162, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.378, "year": 1995, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.72, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.43, "year": 1995, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.216, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.112, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.258, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.258, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.162, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.162, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.204, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.564, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.564, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.557, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 1995, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.172, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 192}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8de4ed8301564db0b7e99a31d21cbdb8", "name": "Malaysia 1990 (GE-08) - Federal parliamentary by constituency", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 1990, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia GE-08 (1990) Dewan Rakyat (federal House) results at PARLIAMENTARY-SEAT (constituency) granularity - 180 single-member FPTP seats across 15 states/territories. NOT polling-station level (the federal file is seat-level). Source: Harvard Dataverse Malaysian Election Corpus (doi:10.7910/DVN/O4CRXK), federal_ballots.parquet + federal_stats.parquet. Candidates pivoted wide by PARTY (votes_<party>); a party appearing twice in a seat (independents) is summed. registered=voters_total, cast=ballots_issued, valid=votes_valid, invalid=votes_rejected. Ballot votes sum EXACTLY to votes_valid (gap=0). Uncontested seats have cast/valid=0 in source (kept, not fabricated).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_akar": "AKAR - People's Justice Movement", "votes_bebas": "BEBAS - Independent", "votes_dap": "DAP - Democratic Action Party", "votes_gerakan": "GERAKAN - Malaysian People's Movement Party", "votes_hamim": "HAMIM - Malaysian Muslim People's Party", "votes_ipf": "IPF - All Malaysia Indian Progressive Front", "votes_mca": "MCA - Malaysian Chinese Association", "votes_mic": "MIC - Malaysian Indian Congress", "votes_pas": "PAS - Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party", "votes_pbb": "PBB - Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu Sarawak", "votes_pbds": "PBDS - Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak", "votes_pbs": "PBS - Parti Bersatu Sabah", "votes_permas": "PERMAS - Sarawak Malaysian People's Association", "votes_plus": "PLUS - Sarawak United Labour Party", "votes_prm": "PRM - Malaysian People's Party", "votes_s46": "S46 - Spirit of 46 Malay Party", "votes_snap": "SNAP - Sarawak National Party", "votes_supp": "SUPP - Sarawak United Peoples' Party", "votes_umno": "UMNO - United Malays National Organisation", "votes_usno": "USNO - United Sabah National Organisation"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 180, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 154}, "n_stations_flagged": 154, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:23:06.556818", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.494, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.468, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.26, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.163, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.494, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 1990, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.718, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 1990, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.128, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.282, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.216, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 1990, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.455, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.26, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.26, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.163, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.163, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.204, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.564, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.564, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.53, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.53, "year": 1990, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.172, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 180}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "62a362f0517443a48400268ed106feeb", "name": "Malaysia 1986 (GE-07) - Federal parliamentary by constituency", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 1986, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia GE-07 (1986) Dewan Rakyat (federal House) results at PARLIAMENTARY-SEAT (constituency) granularity - 177 single-member FPTP seats across 15 states/territories. NOT polling-station level (the federal file is seat-level). Source: Harvard Dataverse Malaysian Election Corpus (doi:10.7910/DVN/O4CRXK), federal_ballots.parquet + federal_stats.parquet. Candidates pivoted wide by PARTY (votes_<party>); a party appearing twice in a seat (independents) is summed. registered=voters_total, cast=ballots_issued, valid=votes_valid, invalid=votes_rejected. Ballot votes sum EXACTLY to votes_valid (gap=0). Uncontested seats have cast/valid=0 in source (kept, not fabricated).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bebas": "BEBAS - Independent", "votes_berjaya": "BERJAYA - Sabah People's United Front", "votes_dap": "DAP - Democratic Action Party", "votes_gerakan": "GERAKAN - Malaysian People's Movement Party", "votes_hamim": "HAMIM - Malaysian Muslim People's Party", "votes_mca": "MCA - Malaysian Chinese Association", "votes_mic": "MIC - Malaysian Indian Congress", "votes_momogun": "MOMOGUN - Parti Momogun Kebangsaan Sabah", "votes_nasma": "NASMA - Malaysian Nationalist Party", "votes_pas": "PAS - Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party", "votes_pbb": "PBB - Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu Sarawak", "votes_pbds": "PBDS - Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak", "votes_pbs": "PBS - Parti Bersatu Sabah", "votes_plus": "PLUS - Sarawak United Labour Party", "votes_psrm": "PSRM - Malaysian People's Socialist Party", "votes_sdp": "SDP - Social Democratic Party", "votes_snap": "SNAP - Sarawak National Party", "votes_supp": "SUPP - Sarawak United Peoples' Party", "votes_umno": "UMNO - United Malays National Organisation", "votes_usno": "USNO - United Sabah National Organisation"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 177, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:23:03.726762", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.599, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.463, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.27, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.168, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.599, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 1986, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.463, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.067, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 1986, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.132, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.283, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.216, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 1986, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.445, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.111, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.27, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.27, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.168, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.168, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.226, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.226, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.559, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 1986, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.549, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 1986, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.469, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1986, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 177}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7c99faa890ca4736a72deebc2988729c", "name": "Malaysia 1982 (GE-06) - Federal parliamentary by constituency", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 1982, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia GE-06 (1982) Dewan Rakyat (federal House) results at PARLIAMENTARY-SEAT (constituency) granularity - 154 single-member FPTP seats across 14 states/territories. NOT polling-station level (the federal file is seat-level). Source: Harvard Dataverse Malaysian Election Corpus (doi:10.7910/DVN/O4CRXK), federal_ballots.parquet + federal_stats.parquet. Candidates pivoted wide by PARTY (votes_<party>); a party appearing twice in a seat (independents) is summed. registered=voters_total, cast=ballots_issued, valid=votes_valid, invalid=votes_rejected. Ballot votes sum EXACTLY to votes_valid (gap=0). Uncontested seats have cast/valid=0 in source (kept, not fabricated).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bebas": "BEBAS - Independent", "votes_berjasa": "BERJASA - Malaysian Islamic Justice Party", "votes_berjaya": "BERJAYA - Sabah People's United Front", "votes_dap": "DAP - Democratic Action Party", "votes_gerakan": "GERAKAN - Malaysian People's Movement Party", "votes_mca": "MCA - Malaysian Chinese Association", "votes_mic": "MIC - Malaysian Indian Congress", "votes_pajar": "PAJAR - Sarawak Natives Party", "votes_pas": "PAS - Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party", "votes_pasok": "PASOK - United Pasok Nunukragang National Organisation", "votes_pbb": "PBB - Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu Sarawak", "votes_pekemas": "PEKEMAS - Malaysian Social Justice Party", "votes_psrm": "PSRM - Malaysian People's Socialist Party", "votes_pusaka": "PUSAKA - United Social Gathering Party", "votes_sapo": "SAPO - Sarawak People's Organisation", "votes_sccp": "SCCP - Sabah Chinese Consolidated Party", "votes_sdp": "SDP - Social Democratic Party", "votes_snap": "SNAP - Sarawak National Party", "votes_supp": "SUPP - Sarawak United Peoples' Party", "votes_umno": "UMNO - United Malays National Organisation", "votes_usno": "USNO - United Sabah National Organisation"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 154, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:23:01.093254", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.805, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.469, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.273, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.175, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.805, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.451, "year": 1982, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.469, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.558, "year": 1982, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.333, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.333, "year": 1982, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.216, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 1982, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.448, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.112, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.175, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.175, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.227, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.227, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.563, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 1982, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.549, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 1982, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.463, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.463, "year": 1982, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 154}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "07b22e0587a14139b345dcbe96f89c4f", "name": "Malaysia 1978 (GE-05) - Federal parliamentary by constituency", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 1978, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia GE-05 (1978) Dewan Rakyat (federal House) results at PARLIAMENTARY-SEAT (constituency) granularity - 154 single-member FPTP seats across 14 states/territories. NOT polling-station level (the federal file is seat-level). Source: Harvard Dataverse Malaysian Election Corpus (doi:10.7910/DVN/O4CRXK), federal_ballots.parquet + federal_stats.parquet. Candidates pivoted wide by PARTY (votes_<party>); a party appearing twice in a seat (independents) is summed. registered=voters_total, cast=ballots_issued, valid=votes_valid, invalid=votes_rejected. Ballot votes sum EXACTLY to votes_valid (gap=0). Uncontested seats have cast/valid=0 in source (kept, not fabricated).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bebas": "BEBAS - Independent", "votes_berjaya": "BERJAYA - Sabah People's United Front", "votes_dap": "DAP - Democratic Action Party", "votes_gerakan": "GERAKAN - Malaysian People's Movement Party", "votes_kita": "KITA - People's Welfare Party", "votes_mca": "MCA - Malaysian Chinese Association", "votes_mic": "MIC - Malaysian Indian Congress", "votes_pajar": "PAJAR - Sarawak Natives Party", "votes_pas": "PAS - Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party", "votes_pbb": "PBB - Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu Sarawak", "votes_pekemas": "PEKEMAS - Malaysian Social Justice Party", "votes_pnrs": "PNRS - Sarawak People's National Party", "votes_ppp": "PPP - People's Progressive Party", "votes_pppm": "PPPM - Malaysian Workers' Party", "votes_psrm": "PSRM - Malaysian People's Socialist Party", "votes_pusaka": "PUSAKA - United Social Gathering Party", "votes_sapo": "SAPO - Sarawak People's Organisation", "votes_sca": "SCA - Sarawak Chinese Association", "votes_sdp": "SDP - Social Democratic Party", "votes_sedar": "SEDAR - Sarawak People's Consciousness Party", "votes_snap": "SNAP - Sarawak National Party", "votes_supp": "SUPP - Sarawak United Peoples' Party", "votes_umat": "UMAT - Sarawak People's Party", "votes_umno": "UMNO - United Malays National Organisation", "votes_usno": "USNO - United Sabah National Organisation"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 154, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:22:58.476168", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.806, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.473, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.276, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.194, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.806, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 1978, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.473, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.23, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 1978, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.326, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.332, "year": 1978, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.09, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 1978, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.445, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.111, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.194, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.194, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.209, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.209, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.554, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.554, "year": 1978, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 1978, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.339, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.339, "year": 1978, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.24, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.24, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 154}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "17f78dcab4e149e0954ff09070ab6d60", "name": "Malaysia 1974 (GE-04) - Federal parliamentary by constituency", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 1974, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia GE-04 (1974) Dewan Rakyat (federal House) results at PARLIAMENTARY-SEAT (constituency) granularity - 154 single-member FPTP seats across 14 states/territories. NOT polling-station level (the federal file is seat-level). Source: Harvard Dataverse Malaysian Election Corpus (doi:10.7910/DVN/O4CRXK), federal_ballots.parquet + federal_stats.parquet. Candidates pivoted wide by PARTY (votes_<party>); a party appearing twice in a seat (independents) is summed. registered=voters_total, cast=ballots_issued, valid=votes_valid, invalid=votes_rejected. Ballot votes sum EXACTLY to votes_valid (gap=0). Uncontested seats have cast/valid=0 in source (kept, not fabricated).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bebas": "BEBAS - Independent", "votes_dap": "DAP - Democratic Action Party", "votes_gerakan": "GERAKAN - Malaysian People's Movement Party", "votes_ippp": "IPPP - Independent People's Progressive Party", "votes_kita": "KITA - People's Welfare Party", "votes_mca": "MCA - Malaysian Chinese Association", "votes_mic": "MIC - Malaysian Indian Congress", "votes_pas": "PAS - Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party", "votes_pbb": "PBB - Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu Sarawak", "votes_pekemas": "PEKEMAS - Malaysian Social Justice Party", "votes_ppp": "PPP - People's Progressive Party", "votes_psrm": "PSRM - Malaysian People's Socialist Party", "votes_sca": "SCA - Sarawak Chinese Association", "votes_snap": "SNAP - Sarawak National Party", "votes_supp": "SUPP - Sarawak United Peoples' Party", "votes_umno": "UMNO - United Malays National Organisation", "votes_usno": "USNO - United Sabah National Organisation"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 154, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:22:55.809168", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.806, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.469, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.233, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.179, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.806, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 1974, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.469, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.227, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.32, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 1974, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.09, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 1974, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.445, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.111, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.233, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.233, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.179, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.179, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.193, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.552, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.339, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.339, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.249, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 154}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "520e089602754a43819d6cf9cf98977e", "name": "Malaysia 1969 (GE-03) - Federal parliamentary by constituency", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 1969, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia GE-03 (1969) Dewan Rakyat (federal House) results at PARLIAMENTARY-SEAT (constituency) granularity - 144 single-member FPTP seats across 13 states/territories. NOT polling-station level (the federal file is seat-level). Source: Harvard Dataverse Malaysian Election Corpus (doi:10.7910/DVN/O4CRXK), federal_ballots.parquet + federal_stats.parquet. Candidates pivoted wide by PARTY (votes_<party>); a party appearing twice in a seat (independents) is summed. registered=voters_total, cast=ballots_issued, valid=votes_valid, invalid=votes_rejected. Ballot votes sum EXACTLY to votes_valid (gap=0). Uncontested seats have cast/valid=0 in source (kept, not fabricated).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bebas": "BEBAS - Independent", "votes_dap": "DAP - Democratic Action Party", "votes_gerakan": "GERAKAN - Malaysian People's Movement Party", "votes_mca": "MCA - Malaysian Chinese Association", "votes_mic": "MIC - Malaysian Indian Congress", "votes_pas": "PAS - Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party", "votes_pbrs": "PBRS - United Sabah People's Party", "votes_pcmb": "PCMB - United Malaysia Chinese Organisation", "votes_pesaka": "PESAKA - Pesaka Sarawak", "votes_ppp": "PPP - People's Progressive Party", "votes_pr": "PR - The People's Struggle", "votes_sca": "SCA - Sarawak Chinese Association", "votes_snap": "SNAP - Sarawak National Party", "votes_supp": "SUPP - Sarawak United Peoples' Party", "votes_umno": "UMNO - United Malays National Organisation", "votes_usno": "USNO - United Sabah National Organisation"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 144, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:22:53.185969", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.105, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.875, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.209, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.163, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.105, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.526, "year": 1969, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 1969, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.584, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 1969, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.992, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.498, "year": 1969, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.09, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 1969, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.112, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.209, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.209, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.163, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.163, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.175, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.175, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.558, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.558, "year": 1969, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 1969, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.248, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.248, "year": 1969, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.267, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.267, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 144}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ca46990dc4ee4bb694d5e66eb180e7e0", "name": "Malaysia 1964 (GE-02) - Federal parliamentary by constituency", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 1964, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia GE-02 (1964) Dewan Rakyat (federal House) results at PARLIAMENTARY-SEAT (constituency) granularity - 104 single-member FPTP seats across 11 states/territories. NOT polling-station level (the federal file is seat-level). Source: Harvard Dataverse Malaysian Election Corpus (doi:10.7910/DVN/O4CRXK), federal_ballots.parquet + federal_stats.parquet. Candidates pivoted wide by PARTY (votes_<party>); a party appearing twice in a seat (independents) is summed. registered=voters_total, cast=ballots_issued, valid=votes_valid, invalid=votes_rejected. Ballot votes sum EXACTLY to votes_valid (gap=0). Uncontested seats have cast/valid=0 in source (kept, not fabricated).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bebas": "BEBAS - Independent", "votes_lpm": "LPM - Labour Party of Malaya", "votes_mca": "MCA - Malaysian Chinese Association", "votes_mic": "MIC - Malaysian Indian Congress", "votes_ncp": "NCP - National Convention Party", "votes_neg": "NEG - National Party", "votes_pap": "PAP - People's Alternative Party", "votes_pas": "PAS - Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party", "votes_ppp": "PPP - People's Progressive Party", "votes_pr": "PR - The People's Struggle", "votes_udp": "UDP - United Democratic Party", "votes_umno": "UMNO - United Malays National Organisation"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 104, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:22:50.780822", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.107, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.468, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.303, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.212, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 1964, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.396, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 1964, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.219, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 1964, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.058, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.265, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 1964, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.45, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.113, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.303, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.303, "year": 1964, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.212, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.212, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.211, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.211, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.558, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.558, "year": 1964, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 1964, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.248, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.248, "year": 1964, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.269, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.269, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 104}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5498f02cd388494ba768166db5833b76", "name": "Malaysia 1959 (GE-01) - Federal parliamentary by constituency", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 1959, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia GE-01 (1959) Dewan Rakyat (federal House) results at PARLIAMENTARY-SEAT (constituency) granularity - 104 single-member FPTP seats across 11 states/territories. NOT polling-station level (the federal file is seat-level). Source: Harvard Dataverse Malaysian Election Corpus (doi:10.7910/DVN/O4CRXK), federal_ballots.parquet + federal_stats.parquet. Candidates pivoted wide by PARTY (votes_<party>); a party appearing twice in a seat (independents) is summed. registered=voters_total, cast=ballots_issued, valid=votes_valid, invalid=votes_rejected. Ballot votes sum EXACTLY to votes_valid (gap=0). Uncontested seats have cast/valid=0 in source (kept, not fabricated).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bebas": "BEBAS - Independent", "votes_lpm": "LPM - Labour Party of Malaya", "votes_mca": "MCA - Malaysian Chinese Association", "votes_mic": "MIC - Malaysian Indian Congress", "votes_mp": "MP - Malaya Party", "votes_neg": "NEG - National Party", "votes_pas": "PAS - Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party", "votes_ppp": "PPP - People's Progressive Party", "votes_pr": "PR - The People's Struggle", "votes_umno": "UMNO - United Malays National Organisation"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 104, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:22:48.375425", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.69, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.616, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.313, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.221, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.69, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 1959, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.616, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 1959, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.213, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 1959, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.331, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.333, "year": 1959, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 1959, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.45, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.113, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.313, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.313, "year": 1959, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.221, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.221, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.205, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.554, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.554, "year": 1959, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 1959, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.248, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.248, "year": 1959, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.269, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.269, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 104}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dfc1162117a14b9c9387f176b3c0fa10", "name": "Malaysia 1955 (GE-00) - Federal parliamentary by constituency", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 1955, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia GE-00 (1955) Dewan Rakyat (federal House) results at PARLIAMENTARY-SEAT (constituency) granularity - 52 single-member FPTP seats across 11 states/territories. NOT polling-station level (the federal file is seat-level). Source: Harvard Dataverse Malaysian Election Corpus (doi:10.7910/DVN/O4CRXK), federal_ballots.parquet + federal_stats.parquet. Candidates pivoted wide by PARTY (votes_<party>); a party appearing twice in a seat (independents) is summed. registered=voters_total, cast=ballots_issued, valid=votes_valid, invalid=votes_rejected. Ballot votes sum EXACTLY to votes_valid (gap=0). Uncontested seats have cast/valid=0 in source (kept, not fabricated).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bebas": "BEBAS - Independent", "votes_lpm": "LPM - Labour Party of Malaya", "votes_mca": "MCA - Malaysian Chinese Association", "votes_mic": "MIC - Malaysian Indian Congress", "votes_nap": "NAP - National Association of Perak", "votes_neg": "NEG - National Party", "votes_pas": "PAS - Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party", "votes_pml": "PML - Perak Malay League", "votes_ppp": "PPP - People's Progressive Party", "votes_umno": "UMNO - United Malays National Organisation"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 52, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:22:46.125077", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.703, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.613, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.21, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.187, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.703, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 1955, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.613, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1955, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.925, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.731, "year": 1955, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.216, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.554, "year": 1955, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.331, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.333, "year": 1955, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 1955, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.451, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.113, "year": 1955, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.21, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.21, "year": 1955, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.187, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.187, "year": 1955, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.124, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.124, "year": 1955, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 1955, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.746, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 1955, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.264, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.264, "year": 1955, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.199, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.199, "year": 1955, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 52}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f597cd1633a34dd9ad2096e956e0655c", "name": "Ghana 2024 - Presidential per-constituency (276)", "metadata": {"country": "Ghana", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ghana 7-Dec-2024 presidential, per CONSTITUENCY (276 of the 276 parliamentary constituencies, 16 regions). Source: Harvard Dataverse 'Understanding Ghana's 2024 Presidential Election' (doi:10.7910/DVN/YMQLIQ), Election2024Final.tab -- an SPSS .sav binary under format=original, compiled from EC Ghana Form Ten. NDC/Mahama 56.4% beat NPP/Bawumia 41.8%. registered=Registered_Voters, cast=Total_Votes_Cast_Presidential, valid=Total_Valid_Votes_Presidential, invalid=Rejected_Votes_Presidential. NPP+NDC+Others sums EXACTLY to valid (gap 0) and valid+invalid==cast EXACTLY. 'Others' aggregates all minor presidential candidates (not separable in source). station_id=GH-2024-{nnn} (constituency name in the 'constituency' column). Finer than the corpus's existing 16-region Ghana 2024 presidential.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_ndc": "NDC - John Mahama", "votes_npp": "NPP - Mahamudu Bawumia", "votes_others": "Others (combined)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 276, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:22:43.121821", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.177, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.665, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.56, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.177, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.437, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.66, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.139, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.276, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.344, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.586, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.56, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.638, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 276}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6adb416810994b088df05eb5da068e35", "name": "Germany 2017 - Bundestag per-Wahlkreis (299 constituencies)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "German Bundestag 2017, per Wahlkreis (constituency): 299 constituencies, 16 states. Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/S1M6SA, 01_bundestag_elections.tab (LONG format pivoted wide). registered=electorate, cast=turnout, invalid=`_invalid` row, valid=cast-invalid (party votes incl `_other` reconcile to valid EXACTLY, gap=0). Zweitstimme (second/party-list vote) used as the party vote. One votes_<party> column per party with votes this cycle (34 parties); party_abbrev slug in the label.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_ad_demokraten": "Allianz Deutscher Demokraten (ad-demokraten)", "votes_afd": "Alternative f\u00fcr Deutschland (afd)", "votes_b": "bergpartei, die \u00fcberpartei (b*)", "votes_bge": "B\u00fcndnis Grundeinkommen (bge)", "votes_bp": "Bayernpartei (bp)", "votes_bueso": "B\u00fcrgerrechtsbewegung Solidarit\u00e4t (b\u00fcso)", "votes_cdu": "Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (cdu)", "votes_csu": "Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. (csu)", "votes_dib": "DEMOKRATIE IN BEWEGUNG (dib)", "votes_die_grauen": "Die Grauen \u2013 F\u00fcr alle Generationen (die grauen)", "votes_die_humanisten": "Partei der Humanisten (die humanisten)", "votes_die_linke": "DIE LINKE (die linke)", "votes_die_partei": "Partei f\u00fcr Arbeit, Rechtsstaat, Tierschutz, Elitenf\u00f6rderung und basisdemokratische Initiative (die partei)", "votes_die_rechte": "DIE RECHTE (die rechte)", "votes_die_tierschutzpartei": "PARTEI MENSCH UMWELT TIERSCHUTZ (die tierschutzpartei)", "votes_dkp": "Deutsche Kommunistische Partei (dkp)", "votes_dm": "Deutsche Mitte (dm)", "votes_du": "Die Urbane. Eine HipHop Partei (du.)", "votes_fdp": "Freie Demokratische Partei (fdp)", "votes_freie_waehler": "FREIE W\u00c4HLER (freie w\u00e4hler)", "votes_gartenpartei": "Gartenpartei (gartenpartei)", "votes_gesundheitsforschung": "Partei f\u00fcr Gesundheitsforschung (gesundheitsforschung)", "votes_gruene": "B\u00dcNDNIS 90/DIE GR\u00dcNEN (gr\u00fcne)", "votes_menschliche_welt": "Menschliche Welt (menschliche welt)", "votes_mlpd": "Marxistisch-Leninistische Partei Deutschlands (mlpd)", "votes_npd": "Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands (npd)", "votes_pdv": "Partei der Vernunft (pdv)", "votes_piraten": "Piratenpartei Deutschland (piraten)", "votes_sgp": "Sozialistische Gleichheitspartei, Vierte Internationale (sgp)", "votes_spd": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (spd)", "votes_tierschutzallianz": "Allianz f\u00fcr Menschenrechte, Tier- und Naturschutz (tierschutzallianz)", "votes_v_partei3": "V-Partei\u00b3 - Partei f\u00fcr Ver\u00e4nderung, Vegetarier und Veganer (v partei\u00b3)", "votes_volksabstimmung": "Ab jetzt\u2026Demokratie durch Volksabstimmung (volksabstimmung)", "votes_oedp": "\u00d6kologisch-Demokratische Partei (\u00f6dp)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 299, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:22:36.608997", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.881, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.95, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.889, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.842, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.779, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.012, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.012, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 299}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f46847817e964f378a4d71a2250df903", "name": "Germany 2013 - Bundestag per-Wahlkreis (299 constituencies)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "German Bundestag 2013, per Wahlkreis (constituency): 299 constituencies, 16 states. Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/S1M6SA, 01_bundestag_elections.tab (LONG format pivoted wide). registered=electorate, cast=turnout, invalid=`_invalid` row, valid=cast-invalid (party votes incl `_other` reconcile to valid EXACTLY, gap=0). Zweitstimme (second/party-list vote) used as the party vote. One votes_<party> column per party with votes this cycle (30 parties); party_abbrev slug in the label.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_afd": "Alternative f\u00fcr Deutschland (afd)", "votes_big": "B\u00fcndnis f\u00fcr Innovation & Gerechtigkeit (big)", "votes_bp": "Bayernpartei (bp)", "votes_buendnis_21_rrp": "B\u00fcndnis 21/RRP (b\u00fcndnis 21/rrp)", "votes_bueso": "B\u00fcrgerrechtsbewegung Solidarit\u00e4t (b\u00fcso)", "votes_cdu": "Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (cdu)", "votes_csu": "Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. (csu)", "votes_die_frauen": "Feministische Partei DIE FRAUEN (die frauen)", "votes_die_linke": "DIE LINKE (die linke)", "votes_die_partei": "Partei f\u00fcr Arbeit, Rechtsstaat, Tierschutz, Elitenf\u00f6rderung und basisdemokratische Initiative (die partei)", "votes_die_rechte": "DIE RECHTE (die rechte)", "votes_die_violetten": "Die Violetten (die violetten)", "votes_familie": "Familien-Partei Deutschlands (familie)", "votes_fdp": "Freie Demokratische Partei (fdp)", "votes_freie_waehler": "FREIE W\u00c4HLER (freie w\u00e4hler)", "votes_gruene": "B\u00dcNDNIS 90/DIE GR\u00dcNEN (gr\u00fcne)", "votes_mlpd": "Marxistisch-Leninistische Partei Deutschlands (mlpd)", "votes_nichtwaehler": "Partei der Nichtw\u00e4hler (nichtw\u00e4hler)", "votes_npd": "Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands (npd)", "votes_pbc": "Partei Bibeltreuer Christen (pbc)", "votes_piraten": "Piratenpartei Deutschland (piraten)", "votes_pro_deutschland": "B\u00fcrgerbewegung pro Deutschland (pro deutschland)", "votes_psg": "Partei f\u00fcr Soziale Gleichheit, Sektion der Vierten Internationale (psg)", "votes_rentner": "RENTNER Partei Deutschland (rentner)", "votes_rep": "DIE REPUBLIKANER (rep)", "votes_spd": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (spd)", "votes_tierschutzpartei": "PARTEI MENSCH UMWELT TIERSCHUTZ (tierschutzpartei)", "votes_vernunft": "Partei der Vernunft (vernunft)", "votes_volksabstimmung": "Ab jetzt\u2026Demokratie durch Volksabstimmung (volksabstimmung)", "votes_oedp": "\u00d6kologisch-Demokratische Partei (\u00f6dp)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 299, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:22:33.361880", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.885, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.947, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.892, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.853, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.947, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.938, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.622, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.407, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 299}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d880e5a9c67c4aa6b8685efe6dc35b7b", "name": "Germany 2009 - Bundestag per-Wahlkreis (299 constituencies)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "German Bundestag 2009, per Wahlkreis (constituency): 299 constituencies, 16 states. Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/S1M6SA, 01_bundestag_elections.tab (LONG format pivoted wide). registered=electorate, cast=turnout, invalid=`_invalid` row, valid=cast-invalid (party votes incl `_other` reconcile to valid EXACTLY, gap=0). Zweitstimme (second/party-list vote) used as the party vote. One votes_<party> column per party with votes this cycle (27 parties); party_abbrev slug in the label.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_adm": "Allianz der Mitte (adm)", "votes_bp": "Bayernpartei (bp)", "votes_bueso": "B\u00fcrgerrechtsbewegung Solidarit\u00e4t (b\u00fcso)", "votes_cdu": "Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (cdu)", "votes_cm": "Christliche Mitte (cm)", "votes_csu": "Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. (csu)", "votes_die_linke": "DIE LINKE (die linke)", "votes_die_tierschutzpartei": "PARTEI MENSCH UMWELT TIERSCHUTZ (die tierschutzpartei)", "votes_die_violetten": "Die Violetten (die violetten)", "votes_dkp": "Deutsche Kommunistische Partei (dkp)", "votes_dvu": "Deutsche Volksunion (dvu)", "votes_familie": "Familien-Partei Deutschlands (familie)", "votes_fdp": "Freie Demokratische Partei (fdp)", "votes_fwd": "Freie W\u00e4hler Deutschland (fwd)", "votes_gruene": "B\u00dcNDNIS 90/DIE GR\u00dcNEN (gr\u00fcne)", "votes_mlpd": "Marxistisch-Leninistische Partei Deutschlands (mlpd)", "votes_npd": "Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands (npd)", "votes_pbc": "Partei Bibeltreuer Christen (pbc)", "votes_piraten": "Piratenpartei Deutschland (piraten)", "votes_psg": "Partei f\u00fcr Soziale Gleichheit, Sektion der Vierten Internationale (psg)", "votes_rentner": "Rentner Partei Deutschland (rentner)", "votes_rep": "DIE REPUBLIKANER (rep)", "votes_rrp": "Rentnerinnen- und Rentner-Partei (rrp)", "votes_spd": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (spd)", "votes_volksabstimmung": "Ab jetzt\u2026Demokratie durch Volksabstimmung (volksabstimmung)", "votes_zentrum": "Deutsche Zentrumspartei (zentrum)", "votes_oedp": "\u00d6kologisch-Demokratische Partei (\u00f6dp)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 299, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:22:30.174523", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.946, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.9, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.862, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.973, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.993, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.542, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 299}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c1afbc9f6f3742ee9709e100be1e1962", "name": "Germany 2005 - Bundestag per-Wahlkreis (299 constituencies)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "German Bundestag 2005, per Wahlkreis (constituency): 299 constituencies, 16 states. Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/S1M6SA, 01_bundestag_elections.tab (LONG format pivoted wide). registered=electorate, cast=turnout, invalid=`_invalid` row, valid=cast-invalid (party votes incl `_other` reconcile to valid EXACTLY, gap=0). Zweitstimme (second/party-list vote) used as the party vote. One votes_<party> column per party with votes this cycle (25 parties); party_abbrev slug in the label.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_50plus": "50Plus Das Generationen-B\u00fcndnis (50plus)", "votes_agfg": "Allianz f\u00fcr Gesundheit, Frieden und soziale Gerechtigkeit (agfg)", "votes_appd": "Anarchistische Pogo-Partei Deutschlands (appd)", "votes_bp": "Bayernpartei (bp)", "votes_bueso": "B\u00fcrgerrechtsbewegung Solidarit\u00e4t (b\u00fcso)", "votes_cdu": "Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (cdu)", "votes_csu": "Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. (csu)", "votes_deutschland": "Ab jetzt \u2026 B\u00fcndnis f\u00fcr Deutschland Liste: Gegen Zuwanderung ins \u201eSoziale Netz\u201c (deutschland)", "votes_die_frauen": "Feministische Partei DIE FRAUEN (die frauen)", "votes_die_linke": "DIE LINKE (die linke)", "votes_die_partei": "Partei f\u00fcr Arbeit, Rechtsstaat, Tierschutz, Elitenf\u00f6rderung und basisdemokratische Initiative (die partei)", "votes_die_tierschutzpartei": "PARTEI MENSCH UMWELT TIERSCHUTZ (die tierschutzpartei)", "votes_familie": "Familien-Partei Deutschlands (familie)", "votes_fdp": "Freie Demokratische Partei (fdp)", "votes_graue": "Die Grauen \u2013 Graue Panther (graue)", "votes_gruene": "B\u00dcNDNIS 90/DIE GR\u00dcNEN (gr\u00fcne)", "votes_mlpd": "Marxistisch-Leninistische Partei Deutschlands (mlpd)", "votes_npd": "Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands (npd)", "votes_offensive_d": "Partei Rechtsstaatlicher Offensive (offensive d)", "votes_pbc": "Partei Bibeltreuer Christen (pbc)", "votes_pro_dm": "Pro Deutsche Mitte \u2013 Initiative Pro D-Mark (pro dm)", "votes_psg": "Partei f\u00fcr Soziale Gleichheit, Sektion der Vierten Internationale (psg)", "votes_rep": "DIE REPUBLIKANER (rep)", "votes_spd": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (spd)", "votes_zentrum": "Deutsche Zentrumspartei (zentrum)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 299, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:22:27.087304", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.942, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.859, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.972, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.993, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.512, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 299}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "53d872ecb4cd4e90981f0cc45ac57b76", "name": "Germany 2002 - Bundestag per-Wahlkreis (299 constituencies)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "German Bundestag 2002, per Wahlkreis (constituency): 299 constituencies, 16 states. Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/S1M6SA, 01_bundestag_elections.tab (LONG format pivoted wide). registered=electorate, cast=turnout, invalid=`_invalid` row, valid=cast-invalid (party votes incl `_other` reconcile to valid EXACTLY, gap=0). Zweitstimme (second/party-list vote) used as the party vote. One votes_<party> column per party with votes this cycle (24 parties); party_abbrev slug in the label.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_aufbruch": "Aufbruch f\u00fcr B\u00fcrgerrechte, Freiheit und Gesundheit (aufbruch)", "votes_bp": "Bayernpartei (bp)", "votes_bueso": "B\u00fcrgerrechtsbewegung Solidarit\u00e4t (b\u00fcso)", "votes_cdu": "Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (cdu)", "votes_cm": "Christliche Mitte (cm)", "votes_csu": "Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. (csu)", "votes_die_frauen": "Feministische Partei DIE FRAUEN (die frauen)", "votes_die_tierschutzpartei": "PARTEI MENSCH UMWELT TIERSCHUTZ (die tierschutzpartei)", "votes_die_violetten": "Die Violetten (die violetten)", "votes_familie": "Familien-Partei Deutschlands (familie)", "votes_fdp": "Freie Demokratische Partei (fdp)", "votes_graue": "Die Grauen \u2013 Graue Panther (graue)", "votes_gruene": "B\u00dcNDNIS 90/DIE GR\u00dcNEN (gr\u00fcne)", "votes_hp": "Humanistische Partei (hp)", "votes_kpd": "Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands (kpd)", "votes_npd": "Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands (npd)", "votes_pbc": "Partei Bibeltreuer Christen (pbc)", "votes_pds": "Partei des Demokratischen Sozialismus (pds)", "votes_prg": "Partei f\u00fcr RentenGerechtigkeit und Familie (prg)", "votes_rep": "DIE REPUBLIKANER (rep)", "votes_schill": "Partei Rechtsstaatlicher Offensive (schill)", "votes_spd": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (spd)", "votes_zentrum": "Deutsche Zentrumspartei (zentrum)", "votes_oedp": "\u00d6kologisch-Demokratische Partei (\u00f6dp)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 299, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:22:23.805607", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.939, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.831, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.898, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.859, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 299}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6a6bd63b37a9447096e9ea5ead8c9fcc", "name": "Germany 1998 - Bundestag per-Wahlkreis (328 constituencies)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1998, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "German Bundestag 1998, per Wahlkreis (constituency): 328 constituencies, 16 states. Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/S1M6SA, 01_bundestag_elections.tab (LONG format pivoted wide). registered=electorate, cast=turnout, invalid=`_invalid` row, valid=cast-invalid (party votes incl `_other` reconcile to valid EXACTLY, gap=0). Zweitstimme (second/party-list vote) used as the party vote. One votes_<party> column per party with votes this cycle (33 parties); party_abbrev slug in the label.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_ab_2000": "Partei der Alternativen B\u00fcrgerbewegung 2000 Deutschlands (ab 2000)", "votes_apd": "Autofahrer- und B\u00fcrgerinteressenpartei Deutschlands (apd)", "votes_appd": "Anarchistische Pogo-Partei Deutschlands (appd)", "votes_bfb": "Bund freier B\u00fcrger (bfb)", "votes_bp": "Bayernpartei (bp)", "votes_bueso": "B\u00fcrgerrechtsbewegung Solidarit\u00e4t (b\u00fcso)", "votes_cdu": "Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (cdu)", "votes_chance_2000": "Chance 2000 (chance 2000)", "votes_cm": "Christliche Mitte (cm)", "votes_csu": "Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. (csu)", "votes_deutschland": "Ab jetzt \u2026 B\u00fcndnis f\u00fcr Deutschland Liste: Gegen Zuwanderung ins \u201eSoziale Netz\u201c (deutschland)", "votes_die_frauen": "Feministische Partei DIE FRAUEN (die frauen)", "votes_die_tierschutzpartei": "PARTEI MENSCH UMWELT TIERSCHUTZ (die tierschutzpartei)", "votes_dpd": "Demokratische Partei Deutschlands (dpd)", "votes_dvu": "Deutsche Volksunion (dvu)", "votes_familie": "Familien-Partei Deutschlands (familie)", "votes_fdp": "Freie Demokratische Partei (fdp)", "votes_forum": "Neue Forum (forum)", "votes_graue": "Die Grauen \u2013 Graue Panther (graue)", "votes_gruene": "B\u00dcNDNIS 90/DIE GR\u00dcNEN (gr\u00fcne)", "votes_hp": "Humanistische Partei (hp)", "votes_mlpd": "Marxistisch-Leninistische Partei Deutschlands (mlpd)", "votes_naturgesetz": "Naturgesetz Partei (naturgesetz)", "votes_nichtwaehler": "Partei der Nichtw\u00e4hler (nichtw\u00e4hler)", "votes_npd": "Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands (npd)", "votes_pass": "Partei der Arbeitswilligen und Sozial Schwachen (pass)", "votes_pbc": "Partei Bibeltreuer Christen (pbc)", "votes_pds": "Partei des Demokratischen Sozialismus (pds)", "votes_pro_dm": "Pro Deutsche Mitte \u2013 Initiative Pro D-Mark (pro dm)", "votes_psg": "Partei f\u00fcr Soziale Gleichheit, Sektion der Vierten Internationale (psg)", "votes_rep": "DIE REPUBLIKANER (rep)", "votes_spd": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (spd)", "votes_oedp": "\u00d6kologisch-Demokratische Partei (\u00f6dp)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 328, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:22:20.523156", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.94, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.831, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.894, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.856, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.965, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.767, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.561, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.64, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.894, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 328}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "888284a6d1914b728e1cd8eec3761d7f", "name": "Germany 1994 - Bundestag per-Wahlkreis (328 constituencies)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1994, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "German Bundestag 1994, per Wahlkreis (constituency): 328 constituencies, 16 states. Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/S1M6SA, 01_bundestag_elections.tab (LONG format pivoted wide). registered=electorate, cast=turnout, invalid=`_invalid` row, valid=cast-invalid (party votes incl `_other` reconcile to valid EXACTLY, gap=0). Zweitstimme (second/party-list vote) used as the party vote. One votes_<party> column per party with votes this cycle (22 parties); party_abbrev slug in the label.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_apd": "Autofahrer- und B\u00fcrgerinteressenpartei Deutschlands (apd)", "votes_bp": "Bayernpartei (bp)", "votes_bsa": "Bund Sozialistischer Arbeiter (bsa)", "votes_bueso": "B\u00fcrgerrechtsbewegung Solidarit\u00e4t (b\u00fcso)", "votes_cdu": "Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (cdu)", "votes_cm": "Christliche Mitte (cm)", "votes_csu": "Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. (csu)", "votes_die_tierschutzpartei": "PARTEI MENSCH UMWELT TIERSCHUTZ (die tierschutzpartei)", "votes_fdp": "Freie Demokratische Partei (fdp)", "votes_graue": "Die Grauen \u2013 Graue Panther (graue)", "votes_gruene": "B\u00dcNDNIS 90/DIE GR\u00dcNEN (gr\u00fcne)", "votes_liga": "Christliche Liga (liga)", "votes_mlpd": "Marxistisch-Leninistische Partei Deutschlands (mlpd)", "votes_naturgesetz": "Naturgesetz Partei (naturgesetz)", "votes_pass": "Partei der Arbeitswilligen und Sozial Schwachen (pass)", "votes_pbc": "Partei Bibeltreuer Christen (pbc)", "votes_pds": "Partei des Demokratischen Sozialismus (pds)", "votes_rep": "DIE REPUBLIKANER (rep)", "votes_spd": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (spd)", "votes_statt_partei": "Statt Partei (statt partei)", "votes_zentrum": "Deutsche Zentrumspartei (zentrum)", "votes_oedp": "\u00d6kologisch-Demokratische Partei (\u00f6dp)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 328, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:22:17.252144", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.94, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.83, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.853, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.964, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.764, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.594, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 328}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5b6a0ee4e21b490db6588b07d0cd88bc", "name": "Germany 1990 - Bundestag per-Wahlkreis (328 constituencies)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1990, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "German Bundestag 1990, per Wahlkreis (constituency): 328 constituencies, 16 states. Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/S1M6SA, 01_bundestag_elections.tab (LONG format pivoted wide). registered=electorate, cast=turnout, invalid=`_invalid` row, valid=cast-invalid (party votes incl `_other` reconcile to valid EXACTLY, gap=0). Zweitstimme (second/party-list vote) used as the party vote. One votes_<party> column per party with votes this cycle (24 parties); party_abbrev slug in the label.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_b90_gr": "B\u00fcndnis 90/Gr\u00fcne \u2013 B\u00fcrgerInnenbewegungen (b90/gr.)", "votes_bp": "Bayernpartei (bp)", "votes_bsa": "Bund Sozialistischer Arbeiter (bsa)", "votes_cdu": "Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (cdu)", "votes_cm": "Christliche Mitte (cm)", "votes_csu": "Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. (csu)", "votes_ddd": "Bund der Deutschen Demokraten (ddd)", "votes_dsu": "Deutsche Soziale Union (dsu)", "votes_fdp": "Freie Demokratische Partei (fdp)", "votes_frauen": "Frauenpartei (frauen)", "votes_graue": "Die Grauen \u2013 Graue Panther (graue)", "votes_gruene": "B\u00dcNDNIS 90/DIE GR\u00dcNEN (gr\u00fcne)", "votes_kpd": "Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands (kpd)", "votes_liga": "Christliche Liga (liga)", "votes_muendige_buerger": "Die M\u00fcndigen B\u00fcrger (m\u00fcndige b\u00fcrger)", "votes_npd": "Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands (npd)", "votes_patrioten": "Patrioten f\u00fcr Deutschland (patrioten)", "votes_pds": "Partei des Demokratischen Sozialismus (pds)", "votes_rep": "DIE REPUBLIKANER (rep)", "votes_spad": "Spartakist-Arbeiterpartei Deutschlands (spad)", "votes_spd": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (spd)", "votes_vaa": "Vereinigung der Arbeitskreise f\u00fcr Arbeitnehmerpolitik und Demokratie (vaa)", "votes_oedp": "\u00d6kologisch-Demokratische Partei (\u00f6dp)", "votes_oeko_union": "Deutsche Solidarit\u00e4t \u2013 Union f\u00fcr Umwelt und Lebensschutz (\u00f6ko-union)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 328, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:22:13.889717", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.928, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.85, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.892, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.853, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.961, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.595, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.823, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 1990, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 328}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "220c520f24c14a1ba40af8ddfc7acd57", "name": "Germany 1987 - Bundestag per-Wahlkreis (248 constituencies)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1987, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "German Bundestag 1987, per Wahlkreis (constituency): 248 constituencies, 10 states. Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/S1M6SA, 01_bundestag_elections.tab (LONG format pivoted wide). registered=electorate, cast=turnout, invalid=`_invalid` row, valid=cast-invalid (party votes incl `_other` reconcile to valid EXACTLY, gap=0). Zweitstimme (second/party-list vote) used as the party vote. One votes_<party> column per party with votes this cycle (16 parties); party_abbrev slug in the label.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_asd": "Alle Sozialversicherten und Rentner Deutschlands (asd)", "votes_bp": "Bayernpartei (bp)", "votes_cbv": "Christliche Bayerische Volkspartei (cbv)", "votes_cdu": "Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (cdu)", "votes_csu": "Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. (csu)", "votes_fap": "Freiheitliche Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (fap)", "votes_fdp": "Freie Demokratische Partei (fdp)", "votes_frauen": "Frauenpartei (frauen)", "votes_gruene": "B\u00dcNDNIS 90/DIE GR\u00dcNEN (gr\u00fcne)", "votes_mlpd": "Marxistisch-Leninistische Partei Deutschlands (mlpd)", "votes_muendige_buerger": "Die M\u00fcndigen B\u00fcrger (m\u00fcndige b\u00fcrger)", "votes_npd": "Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands (npd)", "votes_patrioten": "Patrioten f\u00fcr Deutschland (patrioten)", "votes_spd": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (spd)", "votes_zentrum": "Deutsche Zentrumspartei (zentrum)", "votes_oedp": "\u00d6kologisch-Demokratische Partei (\u00f6dp)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 248, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:22:10.858367", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.941, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.835, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.864, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.823, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.761, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.595, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 1987, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.823, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.979, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 248}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7c90ac06e15846a69633ac903303030d", "name": "Germany 1983 - Bundestag per-Wahlkreis (248 constituencies)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1983, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "German Bundestag 1983, per Wahlkreis (constituency): 248 constituencies, 10 states. Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/S1M6SA, 01_bundestag_elections.tab (LONG format pivoted wide). registered=electorate, cast=turnout, invalid=`_invalid` row, valid=cast-invalid (party votes incl `_other` reconcile to valid EXACTLY, gap=1). Zweitstimme (second/party-list vote) used as the party vote. One votes_<party> column per party with votes this cycle (13 parties); party_abbrev slug in the label.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bwk": "Bund Westdeutscher Kommunisten (bwk)", "votes_cbv": "Christliche Bayerische Volkspartei (cbv)", "votes_cdu": "Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (cdu)", "votes_csu": "Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. (csu)", "votes_dkp": "Deutsche Kommunistische Partei (dkp)", "votes_eap": "Europ\u00e4ische Arbeiter-Partei (eap)", "votes_fdp": "Freie Demokratische Partei (fdp)", "votes_gruene": "B\u00dcNDNIS 90/DIE GR\u00dcNEN (gr\u00fcne)", "votes_kpd": "Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands (kpd)", "votes_npd": "Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands (npd)", "votes_spd": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (spd)", "votes_usd": "Unabh\u00e4ngige Soziale Demokraten (usd)", "votes_oedp": "\u00d6kologisch-Demokratische Partei (\u00f6dp)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 248, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:22:07.920419", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.942, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.848, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.864, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.82, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.964, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.764, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 1983, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.979, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 248}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4bbdf0fbb17a4308bf4287020913cf68", "name": "Germany 1980 - Bundestag per-Wahlkreis (248 constituencies)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1980, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "German Bundestag 1980, per Wahlkreis (constituency): 248 constituencies, 10 states. Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/S1M6SA, 01_bundestag_elections.tab (LONG format pivoted wide). registered=electorate, cast=turnout, invalid=`_invalid` row, valid=cast-invalid (party votes incl `_other` reconcile to valid EXACTLY, gap=80). Zweitstimme (second/party-list vote) used as the party vote. One votes_<party> column per party with votes this cycle (12 parties); party_abbrev slug in the label.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_buergerpartei": "B\u00fcrgerpartei (b\u00fcrgerpartei)", "votes_cbv": "Christliche Bayerische Volkspartei (cbv)", "votes_cdu": "Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (cdu)", "votes_csu": "Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. (csu)", "votes_dkp": "Deutsche Kommunistische Partei (dkp)", "votes_eap": "Europ\u00e4ische Arbeiter-Partei (eap)", "votes_fdp": "Freie Demokratische Partei (fdp)", "votes_gruene": "B\u00dcNDNIS 90/DIE GR\u00dcNEN (gr\u00fcne)", "votes_kbw": "Kommunistischer Bund Westdeutschland (kbw)", "votes_npd": "Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands (npd)", "votes_spd": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (spd)", "votes_v": "Volksfront gegen Reaktion, Faschismus und Krieg (v)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 248, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:22:04.862272", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.94, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.849, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.864, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.822, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.702, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 1980, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.979, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 248}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f81eecefae9a47bc94c433a334d78871", "name": "Germany 1976 - Bundestag per-Wahlkreis (248 constituencies)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1976, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "German Bundestag 1976, per Wahlkreis (constituency): 248 constituencies, 10 states. Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/S1M6SA, 01_bundestag_elections.tab (LONG format pivoted wide). registered=electorate, cast=turnout, invalid=`_invalid` row, valid=cast-invalid (party votes incl `_other` reconcile to valid EXACTLY, gap=0). Zweitstimme (second/party-list vote) used as the party vote. One votes_<party> column per party with votes this cycle (16 parties); party_abbrev slug in the label.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_5_block": "5%-Block (5%-block)", "votes_aud": "Aktionsgemeinschaft Unabh\u00e4ngiger Deutscher (aud)", "votes_avp": "Aktionsgemeinschaft Vierte Partei (avp)", "votes_cbv": "Christliche Bayerische Volkspartei (cbv)", "votes_cdu": "Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (cdu)", "votes_csu": "Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. (csu)", "votes_dkp": "Deutsche Kommunistische Partei (dkp)", "votes_eap": "Europ\u00e4ische Arbeiter-Partei (eap)", "votes_fdp": "Freie Demokratische Partei (fdp)", "votes_gim": "Gruppe Internationale Marxisten (gim)", "votes_kbw": "Kommunistischer Bund Westdeutschland (kbw)", "votes_kpd": "Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands (kpd)", "votes_npd": "Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands (npd)", "votes_spd": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (spd)", "votes_uap": "Unabh\u00e4ngige Arbeiter-Partei (uap)", "votes_vl": "Vereinigte Linke (vl)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 248, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:22:01.852427", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.863, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.849, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.854, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.809, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.696, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.809, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 248}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2a3bb227f0a9402d99bc2c9cebb13c54", "name": "Germany 1972 - Bundestag per-Wahlkreis (248 constituencies)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1972, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "German Bundestag 1972, per Wahlkreis (constituency): 248 constituencies, 10 states. Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/S1M6SA, 01_bundestag_elections.tab (LONG format pivoted wide). registered=electorate, cast=turnout, invalid=`_invalid` row, valid=cast-invalid (party votes incl `_other` reconcile to valid EXACTLY, gap=0). Zweitstimme (second/party-list vote) used as the party vote. One votes_<party> column per party with votes this cycle (8 parties); party_abbrev slug in the label.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_cdu": "Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (cdu)", "votes_csu": "Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. (csu)", "votes_dkp": "Deutsche Kommunistische Partei (dkp)", "votes_efp": "Europ\u00e4ische F\u00f6deralistische Partei (efp)", "votes_fdp": "Freie Demokratische Partei (fdp)", "votes_fsu": "Freisoziale Union (fsu)", "votes_npd": "Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands (npd)", "votes_spd": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (spd)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 248, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:21:58.809854", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.872, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.852, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.854, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.81, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.872, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.693, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.6, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 1972, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.939, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 248}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5321cdffbf1343dcba8742e0287fcfae", "name": "Germany 1969 - Bundestag per-Wahlkreis (248 constituencies)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1969, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "German Bundestag 1969, per Wahlkreis (constituency): 248 constituencies, 10 states. Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/S1M6SA, 01_bundestag_elections.tab (LONG format pivoted wide). registered=electorate, cast=turnout, invalid=`_invalid` row, valid=cast-invalid (party votes incl `_other` reconcile to valid EXACTLY, gap=0). Zweitstimme (second/party-list vote) used as the party vote. One votes_<party> column per party with votes this cycle (12 parties); party_abbrev slug in the label.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_adf": "Aktion Demokratischer Fortschritt (adf)", "votes_bp": "Bayernpartei (bp)", "votes_cdu": "Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (cdu)", "votes_csu": "Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. (csu)", "votes_ep": "Europa-Partei (ep)", "votes_fdp": "Freie Demokratische Partei (fdp)", "votes_fsu": "Freisoziale Union (fsu)", "votes_gpd": "Gesamtdeutsche Partei Deutschlands (gpd)", "votes_npd": "Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands (npd)", "votes_spd": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (spd)", "votes_uap": "Unabh\u00e4ngige Arbeiter-Partei (uap)", "votes_zentrum": "Deutsche Zentrumspartei (zentrum)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 248, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:21:55.862119", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.874, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.759, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.842, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.795, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.874, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.759, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.542, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 1969, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 1969, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.795, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 1969, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 1969, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 248}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d72f15dd97c6404abd34733372920cf6", "name": "Germany 1965 - Bundestag per-Wahlkreis (248 constituencies)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1965, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "German Bundestag 1965, per Wahlkreis (constituency): 248 constituencies, 10 states. Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/S1M6SA, 01_bundestag_elections.tab (LONG format pivoted wide). registered=electorate, cast=turnout, invalid=`_invalid` row, valid=cast-invalid (party votes incl `_other` reconcile to valid EXACTLY, gap=0). Zweitstimme (second/party-list vote) used as the party vote. One votes_<party> column per party with votes this cycle (11 parties); party_abbrev slug in the label.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_aud": "Aktionsgemeinschaft Unabh\u00e4ngiger Deutscher (aud)", "votes_cdu": "Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (cdu)", "votes_csu": "Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. (csu)", "votes_cvp": "Christliche Volkspartei (cvp)", "votes_dfu": "Deutsche Friedensunion (dfu)", "votes_efp": "Europ\u00e4ische F\u00f6deralistische Partei (efp)", "votes_fdp": "Freie Demokratische Partei (fdp)", "votes_fsu": "Freisoziale Union (fsu)", "votes_npd": "Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands (npd)", "votes_spd": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (spd)", "votes_uap": "Unabh\u00e4ngige Arbeiter-Partei (uap)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 248, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:21:52.968472", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.873, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.762, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.8, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.689, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.584, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 1965, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.012, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.012, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 248}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0d949b8b8fd5449daa8e1432c3d8eeec", "name": "Germany 1961 - Bundestag per-Wahlkreis (247 constituencies)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1961, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "German Bundestag 1961, per Wahlkreis (constituency): 247 constituencies, 10 states. Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/S1M6SA, 01_bundestag_elections.tab (LONG format pivoted wide). registered=electorate, cast=turnout, invalid=`_invalid` row, valid=cast-invalid (party votes incl `_other` reconcile to valid EXACTLY, gap=0). Zweitstimme (second/party-list vote) used as the party vote. One votes_<party> column per party with votes this cycle (9 parties); party_abbrev slug in the label.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_cdu": "Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (cdu)", "votes_csu": "Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. (csu)", "votes_dfu": "Deutsche Friedensunion (dfu)", "votes_dg": "Deutsche Gemeinschaft (dg)", "votes_drp": "Deutsche Reichspartei (drp)", "votes_fdp": "Freie Demokratische Partei (fdp)", "votes_gdp": "Gesamtdeutsche Partei (gdp)", "votes_spd": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (spd)", "votes_ssw": "S\u00fcdschleswigscher W\u00e4hlerverband (ssw)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 247, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:21:49.988676", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.768, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.835, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.789, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.693, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.587, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 1961, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 1961, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 1961, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 1961, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.012, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.012, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 247}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "af37c9ca55814f21a827406ce2754ebc", "name": "Germany 1957 - Bundestag per-Wahlkreis (247 constituencies)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1957, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "German Bundestag 1957, per Wahlkreis (constituency): 247 constituencies, 10 states. Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/S1M6SA, 01_bundestag_elections.tab (LONG format pivoted wide). registered=electorate, cast=turnout, invalid=`_invalid` row, valid=cast-invalid (party votes incl `_other` reconcile to valid EXACTLY, gap=0). Zweitstimme (second/party-list vote) used as the party vote. One votes_<party> column per party with votes this cycle (13 parties); party_abbrev slug in the label.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bdd": "Bund der Deutschen, Partei f\u00fcr Einheit, Frieden und Freiheit (bdd)", "votes_cdu": "Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (cdu)", "votes_csu": "Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. (csu)", "votes_dg": "Deutsche Gemeinschaft (dg)", "votes_dp": "Deutsche Partei (dp)", "votes_drp": "Deutsche Reichspartei (drp)", "votes_fdp": "Freie Demokratische Partei (fdp)", "votes_fu": "F\u00f6deralistische Union (fu)", "votes_gb_bhe": "Gesamtdeutscher Block / Bund der Heimatvertriebenen und Entrechteten (gb/bhe)", "votes_mittelstand": "Deutscher Mittelstand (mittelstand)", "votes_spd": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (spd)", "votes_ssw": "S\u00fcdschleswigscher W\u00e4hlerverband (ssw)", "votes_vu": "Vaterl\u00e4ndische Union (vu)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 247, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:21:46.946081", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.87, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.738, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.832, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.786, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 1957, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.508, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.627, "year": 1957, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 1957, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.786, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 1957, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 1957, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.014, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.014, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 247}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5593ad3228e6490cb92af0712073084c", "name": "Germany 1953 - Bundestag per-Wahlkreis (242 constituencies)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1953, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "German Bundestag 1953, per Wahlkreis (constituency): 242 constituencies, 9 states. Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/S1M6SA, 01_bundestag_elections.tab (LONG format pivoted wide). registered=electorate, cast=turnout, invalid=`_invalid` row, valid=cast-invalid (party votes incl `_other` reconcile to valid EXACTLY, gap=0). Zweitstimme (second/party-list vote) used as the party vote. One votes_<party> column per party with votes this cycle (13 parties); party_abbrev slug in the label.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bp": "Bayernpartei (bp)", "votes_cdu": "Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (cdu)", "votes_csu": "Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. (csu)", "votes_dns": "Dachverband der Nationalen Sammlung (dns)", "votes_dp": "Deutsche Partei (dp)", "votes_drp": "Deutsche Reichspartei (drp)", "votes_fdp": "Freie Demokratische Partei (fdp)", "votes_gb_bhe": "Gesamtdeutscher Block / Bund der Heimatvertriebenen und Entrechteten (gb/bhe)", "votes_gvp": "Gesamtdeutsche Volkspartei (gvp)", "votes_kpd": "Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands (kpd)", "votes_spd": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (spd)", "votes_ssw": "S\u00fcdschleswigscher W\u00e4hlerverband (ssw)", "votes_zentrum": "Deutsche Zentrumspartei (zentrum)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 242, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:21:44.010439", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.59, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.812, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.765, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 1953, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.496, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 1953, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 1953, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 1953, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.718, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.718, "year": 1953, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.018, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 242}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "98779b77c43943b5ac9ecd9fbadb24d8", "name": "Germany 1949 - Bundestag per-Wahlkreis (242 constituencies)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1949, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "German Bundestag 1949, per Wahlkreis (constituency): 242 constituencies, 9 states. Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/S1M6SA, 01_bundestag_elections.tab (LONG format pivoted wide). registered=electorate, cast=turnout, invalid=`_invalid` row, valid=cast-invalid (party votes incl `_other` reconcile to valid EXACTLY, gap=0). 1949 used a SINGLE vote (no Zweitstimme); first_vote used here. One votes_<party> column per party with votes this cycle (15 parties); party_abbrev slug in the label.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_other": "\u00dcbrige (_other)", "votes_bp": "Bayernpartei (bp)", "votes_cdu": "Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (cdu)", "votes_csu": "Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. (csu)", "votes_dkp_drp": "Deutsche Konservative Partei / Deutsche Rechtspartei (dkp/drp)", "votes_dp": "Deutsche Partei (dp)", "votes_evd": "Europ\u00e4ische Volksbewegung Deutschlands (evd)", "votes_fdp": "Freie Demokratische Partei (fdp)", "votes_kpd": "Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands (kpd)", "votes_rsf": "Radikal-Soziale Freiheitspartei (rsf)", "votes_rwvp": "Rheinisch-Westf\u00e4lische Volkspartei (rwvp)", "votes_spd": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (spd)", "votes_ssw": "S\u00fcdschleswigscher W\u00e4hlerverband (ssw)", "votes_wav": "Wirtschaftliche Aufbauvereinigung (wav)", "votes_zentrum": "Deutsche Zentrumspartei (zentrum)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 242, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:21:41.055916", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.668, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.584, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.793, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.742, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.668, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.584, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.249, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 1949, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.876, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1949, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 1949, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.742, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 1949, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.682, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 1949, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.02, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 242}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0f718b7fb97d4581929df5f34cfea5b9", "name": "Germany 2021 - Bundestag per-Wahlkreis (299 constituencies)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "German Bundestag 2021, per Wahlkreis (constituency): 299 constituencies, 16 states. Source: Harvard Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/S1M6SA, 01_bundestag_elections.tab (LONG format pivoted wide). registered=electorate, cast=turnout, invalid=`_invalid` row, valid=cast-invalid (party votes incl `_other` reconcile to valid EXACTLY, gap=0). Zweitstimme (second/party-list vote) used as the party vote. One votes_<party> column per party with votes this cycle (40 parties); party_abbrev slug in the label.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_iii_weg": "DER DRITTE WEG (III. weg)", "votes_afd": "Alternative f\u00fcr Deutschland (afd)", "votes_bp": "Bayernpartei (bp)", "votes_buendnis_c": "B\u00fcndnis C - Christen f\u00fcr Deutschland (b\u00fcndnis c)", "votes_buendnis21": "diePinken/B\u00dcNDNIS21 (b\u00fcndnis21)", "votes_buergerbewegung": "B\u00fcrgerbewegung f\u00fcr Fortschritt und Wandel (b\u00fcrgerbewegung)", "votes_bueso": "B\u00fcrgerrechtsbewegung Solidarit\u00e4t (b\u00fcso)", "votes_cdu": "Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (cdu)", "votes_csu": "Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. (csu)", "votes_dib": "DEMOKRATIE IN BEWEGUNG (dib)", "votes_die_grauen": "Die Grauen \u2013 F\u00fcr alle Generationen (die grauen)", "votes_die_humanisten": "Partei der Humanisten (die humanisten)", "votes_die_linke": "DIE LINKE (die linke)", "votes_die_partei": "Partei f\u00fcr Arbeit, Rechtsstaat, Tierschutz, Elitenf\u00f6rderung und basisdemokratische Initiative (die partei)", "votes_die_tierschutzpartei": "PARTEI MENSCH UMWELT TIERSCHUTZ (die tierschutzpartei)", "votes_diebasis": "Basisdemokratische Partei Deutschland (diebasis)", "votes_dkp": "Deutsche Kommunistische Partei (dkp)", "votes_du": "Die Urbane. Eine HipHop Partei (du.)", "votes_fdp": "Freie Demokratische Partei (fdp)", "votes_freie_waehler": "FREIE W\u00c4HLER (freie w\u00e4hler)", "votes_gartenpartei": "Gartenpartei (gartenpartei)", "votes_gesundheitsforschung": "Partei f\u00fcr Gesundheitsforschung (gesundheitsforschung)", "votes_gruene": "B\u00dcNDNIS 90/DIE GR\u00dcNEN (gr\u00fcne)", "votes_lfk": "Lobbyisten f\u00fcr Kinder (lfk)", "votes_liebe": "Europ\u00e4ische Partei LIEBE (liebe)", "votes_lkr": "Liberal-Konservative Reformer (lkr)", "votes_menschliche_welt": "Menschliche Welt (menschliche welt)", "votes_mlpd": "Marxistisch-Leninistische Partei Deutschlands (mlpd)", "votes_npd": "Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands (npd)", "votes_pdf": "Partei des Fortschritts (pdf)", "votes_piraten": "Piratenpartei Deutschland (piraten)", "votes_sgp": "Sozialistische Gleichheitspartei, Vierte Internationale (sgp)", "votes_spd": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (spd)", "votes_ssw": "S\u00fcdschleswigscher W\u00e4hlerverband (ssw)", "votes_team_todenhoefer": "Team Todenh\u00f6fer \u2013 Die Gerechtigkeitspartei (team todenh\u00f6fer)", "votes_tierschutzallianz": "Allianz f\u00fcr Menschenrechte, Tier- und Naturschutz (tierschutzallianz)", "votes_unabhaengige": "UNABH\u00c4NGIGE f\u00fcr b\u00fcrgernahe Demokratie (unabh\u00e4ngige)", "votes_v_partei3": "V-Partei\u00b3 - Partei f\u00fcr Ver\u00e4nderung, Vegetarier und Veganer (v partei\u00b3)", "votes_volt": "Volt Deutschland (volt)", "votes_oedp": "\u00d6kologisch-Demokratische Partei (\u00f6dp)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 299, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:19:29.735967", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.863, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.814, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.016, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 299}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cb336c53302d4d7eb74a85e707d6814e", "name": "Turkey 2023 parliamentary (overnight turkey_2023_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Turkey", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://acikveri.ysk.gov.tr/  (YSK Open Data Portal API: getSecimSandikSonucList?secimId=20230&secimTuru=8&sorguTuru=2)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"il_ID": "il_ID", "ilce_ID": "ilce_ID", "muhtarlik_ID": "muhtarlik_ID", "MILLET": "MILLET", "HAK_PAR": "HAK_PAR", "TKP": "TKP", "TKH": "TKH", "SOL_PARTI": "SOL_PARTI", "GENCPARTI": "GENCPARTI", "MEMLEKET": "MEMLEKET", "BBP": "BBP", "AK_PARTI": "AK_PARTI", "YENIDEN_REFAH": "YENIDEN_REFAH", "MHP": "MHP", "YESIL_SOL_PARTI": "YESIL_SOL_PARTI", "TIP": "TIP", "AB": "AB", "ANAP": "ANAP", "YP": "YP", "HKP": "HKP", "MILLI_YOL": "MILLI_YOL", "VATAN_PARTISI": "VATAN_PARTISI", "GBP": "GBP", "CHP": "CHP", "IYI_PARTI": "IYI_PARTI", "AP": "AP", "ZAFER_PARTISI": "ZAFER_PARTISI", "BAGIMSIZ": "BAGIMSIZ"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 192214, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 3744, "votes_gt_valid": 192214}, "n_stations_flagged": 192214, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:15:57.245189", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.462, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.85, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.285, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.108, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.462, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.474, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.747, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.366, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.342, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.995, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.222, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.285, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.285, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.108, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.108, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.193, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.388, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.178, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.178, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.177, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.177, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 192214}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2af5db48f6254e3ab669540c70ba7098", "name": "Turkey 2018 parliamentary (overnight turkey_2018_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Turkey", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/oztalha/YSK-2018 (YSK-MV-18.csv); scraped from official ysk.gov.tr 2018-06-24 results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"sandik_no": "sandik_no", "AKP": "AKP", "MHP": "MHP", "HUDA_PAR": "HUDA_PAR", "VATAN": "VATAN", "HDP": "HDP", "CHP": "CHP", "SAADET": "SAADET", "IYI": "IYI", "CUMHUR_ITTIFAKI": "CUMHUR_ITTIFAKI", "MILLET_ITTIFAKI": "MILLET_ITTIFAKI", "BAGIMSIZ": "BAGIMSIZ"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 180065, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 180065, "cast_gt_registered": 3183, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 180065, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:04:27.860059", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.372, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.454, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.295, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.104, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.372, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.593, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.454, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.507, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.377, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.35, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.21, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.092, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.295, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.104, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.104, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.228, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.228, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.357, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.357, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.15, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.15, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.198, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Justice and Development Party (AK)", "winner_candidate": "Recep Tayyip Erdo\u011fan", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Republican People's Party (CHP)", "margin": 21.95, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "TUR", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 180065}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b70d5794d7e842a29e02b8b1fcbbb442", "name": "Turkey 2014 presidential (overnight turkey_2014_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Turkey", "year": 2014, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://acikveri.ysk.gov.tr/api/getSecimSandikSonucList (secimId=13340 Onikinci_Cumhurbaskani_Secimi, secimTuru=9)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ERDOGAN": "ERDOGAN", "DEMIRTAS": "DEMIRTAS", "IHSANOGLU": "IHSANOGLU"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 165467, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1743, "registered_not_positive": 16}, "n_stations_flagged": 1758, "created_at": "2026-06-25T09:01:57.363353", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.714, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.529, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.426, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.252, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.678, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.529, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.678, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.977, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.494, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.279, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.354, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.28, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.32, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.426, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.426, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.252, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.252, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.311, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.311, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.538, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.576, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.576, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.368, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Justice and Development Party (AK)", "winner_candidate": "Recep Tayyip Erdo\u011fan", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Joint candidate of several (heterogeneous) opposition parties", "margin": 13.35, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "TUR", "year": 2014, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 165467}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1c621a142042428b84c4dd57e75565cd", "name": "Colombia 2022 Presidential R1 (mesa-level)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2022, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/uploads.dskt.ch/moe/datos-electorales/censo_electoral.csv (registered) + Registraduria observatorio MMV_NACIONAL_PRESIDENTE_2022 vote workbooks (votes) | REPAIRED 2026-08-31: lat, lon, registered_puesto, mesas_at_puesto and votes_special_votos_nulos had been mis-mapped as CANDIDATE columns, inflating the candidate sum 44x (R1) / 42x (R2); votos_nulos is byte-identical to the invalid column in every row. Removed, so candidates now sum to exactly valid (ratio 1.00000). COORDINATES: 88,277 of the mesas carry a point, but the source supplies only 953 distinct pairs = one per MUNICIPALITY (a centroid replicated across every mesa in that municipality; median 32 mesas per point, 14,935 in Bogota). They are municipality centroids, NOT polling-place locations - point-based spatial tests on them measure municipality-level clustering only.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_enrique_gmez_martnez": "votes_enrique_gmez_martnez", "votes_federico_gutirrez": "votes_federico_gutirrez", "votes_gustavo_petro": "votes_gustavo_petro", "votes_ingrid_betancourt": "votes_ingrid_betancourt", "votes_john_milton_rodrguez": "votes_john_milton_rodrguez", "votes_luis_prez": "votes_luis_prez", "votes_rodolfo_hernndez": "votes_rodolfo_hernndez", "votes_sergio_fajardo": "votes_sergio_fajardo", "votes_votos_no_marcados": "votes_votos_no_marcados", "votes_special_votos_en_blanco": "votes_special_votos_en_blanco"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 103364, "granularity": "polling_station", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1814, "cast_gt_registered": 2253, "votes_gt_valid": 103019}, "n_stations_flagged": 103056, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:58:27.853411", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 88277, "n_distinct_geometry": 800, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.696, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.561, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.696, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.561, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.426, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.426, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.383, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.383, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 103364}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4a6d1f5cbf4c49bfb4328c4228ffae93", "name": "Colombia 2022 Presidential R2 (mesa-level)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2022, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/uploads.dskt.ch/moe/datos-electorales/censo_electoral.csv (registered) + Registraduria observatorio MMV_NACIONAL_PRESIDENTE_2022 vote workbooks (votes) | REPAIRED 2026-08-31: lat, lon, registered_puesto, mesas_at_puesto and votes_special_votos_nulos had been mis-mapped as CANDIDATE columns, inflating the candidate sum 44x (R1) / 42x (R2); votos_nulos is byte-identical to the invalid column in every row. Removed, so candidates now sum to exactly valid (ratio 1.00000). COORDINATES: 88,277 of the mesas carry a point, but the source supplies only 953 distinct pairs = one per MUNICIPALITY (a centroid replicated across every mesa in that municipality; median 32 mesas per point, 14,935 in Bogota). They are municipality centroids, NOT polling-place locations - point-based spatial tests on them measure municipality-level clustering only.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_gustavo_petro": "votes_gustavo_petro", "votes_rodolfo_hernndez": "votes_rodolfo_hernndez", "votes_votos_no_marcados": "votes_votos_no_marcados", "votes_special_votos_en_blanco": "votes_special_votos_en_blanco"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 103363, "granularity": "polling_station", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 103013, "registered_not_positive": 1882, "cast_gt_registered": 2548}, "n_stations_flagged": 103056, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:55:00.925789", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 88277, "n_distinct_geometry": 800, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.696, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.561, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.696, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.561, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.426, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.426, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.383, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.383, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 103363}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0192e44754e24fda905f78ffb7730181", "name": "Azerbaijan 2024 parliamentary (overnight azerbaijan_2024_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Azerbaijan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.infocenter.gov.az/archive/MilliMeclis2024.aspx?i=2&dsk={1..125}", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"constituency_no": "constituency_no", "precinct_no": "precinct_no", "D001__H\u018fS\u018fNOVA K\u0130FAY\u018fT H\u018fS\u018fN": "D001__H\u018fS\u018fNOVA K\u0130FAY\u018fT H\u018fS\u018fN", "D001__MEHD\u0130YEVA \u015eAHNAZ F\u0130ZUL\u0130": "D001__MEHD\u0130YEVA \u015eAHNAZ F\u0130ZUL\u0130", "D001__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV F\u0130KR\u018fT B\u0130NN\u018fT": "D001__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV F\u0130KR\u018fT B\u0130NN\u018fT", "D001__QUL\u00c4\u00b0YEVA NAZ\u00c6\u008fN\u00c4\u00b0 Z\u00d6H\u00dcR": "D001__QUL\u00c4\u00b0YEVA NAZ\u00c6\u008fN\u00c4\u00b0 Z\u00d6H\u00dcR", "D001__\u015eIX\u018fL\u0130YEV \u015eIX\u018fL\u0130 Q\u018fZ\u018fNF\u018fR": "D001__\u015eIX\u018fL\u0130YEV \u015eIX\u018fL\u0130 Q\u018fZ\u018fNF\u018fR", "D001__\u018fSG\u018fROV Z\u0130YAF\u018fT ABBAS": "D001__\u018fSG\u018fROV Z\u0130YAF\u018fT ABBAS", "D002__C\u018fL\u0130LOV F\u018fRD\u0130 TAH\u0130R": "D002__C\u018fL\u0130LOV F\u018fRD\u0130 TAH\u0130R", "D002__H\u00dcSEYN AMAR DA\u00c4\u009eB\u00c6\u008fY\u00c4\u00b0": "D002__H\u00dcSEYN AMAR DA\u00c4\u009eB\u00c6\u008fY\u00c4\u00b0", "D002__NOVRUZOV S\u00c4\u00b0YAVU\u00c5\u009e D\u00dcNYAMALI": "D002__NOVRUZOV S\u00c4\u00b0YAVU\u00c5\u009e D\u00dcNYAMALI", "D002__N\u00c6\u008fC\u00c6\u008fFOV V\u00dcQAR H\u00dcSEYN": "D002__N\u00c6\u008fC\u00c6\u008fFOV V\u00dcQAR H\u00dcSEYN", "D002__SEY\u0130DOV M\u0130RHADI M\u0130RF\u018fTULLA": "D002__SEY\u0130DOV M\u0130RHADI M\u0130RF\u018fTULLA", "D002__T\u018fHM\u018fZOV \u018fHM\u018fD V\u018fL\u0130": "D002__T\u018fHM\u018fZOV \u018fHM\u018fD V\u018fL\u0130", "D002__V\u018fL\u0130YEV NURLAN M\u018fMM\u018fD": "D002__V\u018fL\u0130YEV NURLAN M\u018fMM\u018fD", "D002__\u00c5\u009eAHH\u00dcSEYNOV MAHMUD TARVERD\u00c4\u00b0": "D002__\u00c5\u009eAHH\u00dcSEYNOV MAHMUD TARVERD\u00c4\u00b0", "D002__\u018fL\u0130YEVA N\u018fZ\u0130R\u018f \u0130SMAYIL": "D002__\u018fL\u0130YEVA N\u018fZ\u0130R\u018f \u0130SMAYIL", "D002__\u018fM\u0130RQUL\u0130YEVA LAL\u018f S\u018fF\u018fR": "D002__\u018fM\u0130RQUL\u0130YEVA LAL\u018f S\u018fF\u018fR", "D002__\u018fSG\u018fROV F\u0130ZUL\u0130 QURBAN": "D002__\u018fSG\u018fROV F\u0130ZUL\u0130 QURBAN", "D003__ABBASQUL\u0130YEV FAM\u0130L ABBASQULU": "D003__ABBASQUL\u0130YEV FAM\u0130L ABBASQULU", "D003__BABAYEV AS\u0130MAN \u018fL\u0130": "D003__BABAYEV AS\u0130MAN \u018fL\u0130", "D003__H\u00dcSEYNOV ANAR M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fD": "D003__H\u00dcSEYNOV ANAR M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fD", "D003__MURADOV EM\u0130N M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fM": "D003__MURADOV EM\u0130N M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fM", "D003__M\u00d6HBALIYEV S\u00c6\u008fTTAR SUL\u00c4\u00b0DD\u00c4\u00b0N": "D003__M\u00d6HBALIYEV S\u00c6\u008fTTAR SUL\u00c4\u00b0DD\u00c4\u00b0N", "D003__QUL\u0130YEVA NUR\u015e\u018fN ELB\u018fY\u0130": "D003__QUL\u0130YEVA NUR\u015e\u018fN ELB\u018fY\u0130", "D003__R\u00dcST\u00c6\u008fMOVA G\u00dcLZAR NAD\u00c4\u00b0R": "D003__R\u00dcST\u00c6\u008fMOVA G\u00dcLZAR NAD\u00c4\u00b0R", "D003__S\u018fF\u018fROVA AYN\u0130\u015eAN \u0130LYAS": "D003__S\u018fF\u018fROVA AYN\u0130\u015eAN \u0130LYAS", "D004__M\u00c4\u00b0RZ\u00c6\u008fYEV S\u00dcLEYMAN V\u00dcQAR": "D004__M\u00c4\u00b0RZ\u00c6\u008fYEV S\u00dcLEYMAN V\u00dcQAR", "D004__M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDOVA V\u00dcSAL\u00c6\u008f RAM\u00c4\u00b0Z": "D004__M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDOVA V\u00dcSAL\u00c6\u008f RAM\u00c4\u00b0Z", "D004__NOVRUZOVA G\u00dcNAY \u00c6\u008fZ\u00c4\u00b0Z": "D004__NOVRUZOVA G\u00dcNAY \u00c6\u008fZ\u00c4\u00b0Z", "D004__SEY\u00c4\u00b0DL\u00c4\u00b0 AYAZ Z\u00d6HRAB": "D004__SEY\u00c4\u00b0DL\u00c4\u00b0 AYAZ Z\u00d6HRAB", "D004__\u00c6\u008fS\u00c6\u008fDOVA G\u00dcLM\u00c4\u00b0RA SAH\u00c4\u00b0B": "D004__\u00c6\u008fS\u00c6\u008fDOVA G\u00dcLM\u00c4\u00b0RA SAH\u00c4\u00b0B", "D004__\u0130BRAH\u0130MOV ELDAR RZA": "D004__\u0130BRAH\u0130MOV ELDAR RZA", "D004__\u0130SMAYILOVA V\u018fFA \u018fSG\u018fR": "D004__\u0130SMAYILOVA V\u018fFA \u018fSG\u018fR", "D005__H\u00c6\u008fMZ\u00c6\u008fYEVA \u00dcLV\u00c4\u00b0YY\u00c6\u008f TAPDIQ": "D005__H\u00c6\u008fMZ\u00c6\u008fYEVA \u00dcLV\u00c4\u00b0YY\u00c6\u008f TAPDIQ", "D005__H\u018fS\u018fNOV H\u0130CRAN H\u018fS\u018fN": "D005__H\u018fS\u018fNOV H\u0130CRAN H\u018fS\u018fN", "D005__MEHD\u0130YEV AD\u0130L MEHD\u0130": "D005__MEHD\u0130YEV AD\u0130L MEHD\u0130", "D005__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV \u018fL\u0130 C\u018fF\u018fR": "D005__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV \u018fL\u0130 C\u018fF\u018fR", "D005__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA RUQ\u0130YY\u018f NUR\u018fDD\u0130N": "D005__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA RUQ\u0130YY\u018f NUR\u018fDD\u0130N", "D005__NOVRUZLU G\u00dcNEL SAM\u00c4\u00b0R": "D005__NOVRUZLU G\u00dcNEL SAM\u00c4\u00b0R", "D005__XUD\u0130YEV NAZ\u0130M BAYRAM": "D005__XUD\u0130YEV NAZ\u0130M BAYRAM", "D005__\u0130BRAH\u0130MOV AD\u0130L H\u018fS\u018fN": "D005__\u0130BRAH\u0130MOV AD\u0130L H\u018fS\u018fN", "D005__\u0130SMAYILOV ORXAN \u018fYYUB": "D005__\u0130SMAYILOV ORXAN \u018fYYUB", "D005__\u018fL\u0130RZAYEV S\u018fF\u018fR C\u018fF\u018fR\u018fL\u0130": "D005__\u018fL\u0130RZAYEV S\u018fF\u018fR C\u018fF\u018fR\u018fL\u0130", "D006__ABDULLAYEV MAHMUD EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N": "D006__ABDULLAYEV MAHMUD EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N", "D006__ASLANOV M\u018fTL\u018fB M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fM": "D006__ASLANOV M\u018fTL\u018fB M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fM", "D006__H\u00dcSEYNOV V\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0 AD\u00c4\u00b0L": "D006__H\u00dcSEYNOV V\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0 AD\u00c4\u00b0L", "D006__H\u00dcSEYNOV YUN\u00c4\u00b0S FA\u00c4\u00b0Q": "D006__H\u00dcSEYNOV YUN\u00c4\u00b0S FA\u00c4\u00b0Q", "D006__M\u018fMM\u018fDL\u0130 AYSEL \u018fL\u0130XAN": "D006__M\u018fMM\u018fDL\u0130 AYSEL \u018fL\u0130XAN", "D006__R\u00c6\u008fH\u00c4\u00b0MZAD\u00c6\u008f V\u00dcQAR G\u00c6\u008fNC\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0": "D006__R\u00c6\u008fH\u00c4\u00b0MZAD\u00c6\u008f V\u00dcQAR G\u00c6\u008fNC\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0", "D006__\u018fSG\u018fROV ELNUR \u0130LQAR": "D006__\u018fSG\u018fROV ELNUR \u0130LQAR", "D007__ARPADARA\u0130 N\u0130GAR CAV\u0130D": "D007__ARPADARA\u0130 N\u0130GAR CAV\u0130D", "D007__AXUNDOVA AYDAN KAMRAN": "D007__AXUNDOVA AYDAN KAMRAN", "D007__K\u018fR\u0130MOVA XATUN ZAUR": "D007__K\u018fR\u0130MOVA XATUN ZAUR", "D007__MUXTAROV EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N \u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fM\u00c4\u00b0L": "D007__MUXTAROV EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N \u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fM\u00c4\u00b0L", "D007__NOVRUZOV ELV\u0130N SUC\u018fDD\u0130N": "D007__NOVRUZOV ELV\u0130N SUC\u018fDD\u0130N", "D007__QARAYEV \u018fHL\u0130MAN PA\u015eA": "D007__QARAYEV \u018fHL\u0130MAN PA\u015eA", "D007__\u018fF\u018fND\u0130YEV ELXAN \u015e\u018fR\u0130F": "D007__\u018fF\u018fND\u0130YEV ELXAN \u015e\u018fR\u0130F", "D007__\u018fL\u0130BALAYEV SAH\u0130B ALLAHYAR": "D007__\u018fL\u0130BALAYEV SAH\u0130B ALLAHYAR", "D008__CABBARLI AYDIN AD\u0130L": "D008__CABBARLI AYDIN AD\u0130L", "D008__DA\u015eD\u018fM\u0130RL\u0130 S\u018fNAN RAF\u0130Q": "D008__DA\u015eD\u018fM\u0130RL\u0130 S\u018fNAN RAF\u0130Q", "D008__HACILI MUSTAFA MUSTAFA": "D008__HACILI MUSTAFA MUSTAFA", "D008__M\u0130RZ\u018fYEVA H\u018fC\u018fR N\u0130YAZ\u0130": "D008__M\u0130RZ\u018fYEVA H\u018fC\u018fR N\u0130YAZ\u0130", "D008__QULAM\u0130 TAM\u0130LLA FAM\u0130L": "D008__QULAM\u0130 TAM\u0130LLA FAM\u0130L", "D008__QUL\u0130YEV AZAY \u018fJD\u018fR": "D008__QUL\u0130YEV AZAY \u018fJD\u018fR", "D008__R\u018fH\u0130MOV \u0130LK\u0130N ORUC": "D008__R\u018fH\u0130MOV \u0130LK\u0130N ORUC", "D008__SALMANLI ELM\u00c6\u008fDD\u00c4\u00b0N S\u00dcLEYMAN": "D008__SALMANLI ELM\u00c6\u008fDD\u00c4\u00b0N S\u00dcLEYMAN", "D008__SARIXANLI MEHRAC MAH\u0130R": "D008__SARIXANLI MEHRAC MAH\u0130R", "D008__\u0130BRAH\u0130MOV A\u011eAS\u0130F \u015eAK\u0130R": "D008__\u0130BRAH\u0130MOV A\u011eAS\u0130F \u015eAK\u0130R", "D008__\u018fL\u0130YEV R\u018f\u015e\u0130D \u018fR\u015eAD": "D008__\u018fL\u0130YEV R\u018f\u015e\u0130D \u018fR\u015eAD", "D009__ALI\u015eARLI S\u018fF\u018fR X\u018fL\u0130L": "D009__ALI\u015eARLI S\u018fF\u018fR X\u018fL\u0130L", "D009__F\u018fRZ\u018fL\u0130YEVA ELM\u0130RA RAQUF": "D009__F\u018fRZ\u018fL\u0130YEVA ELM\u0130RA RAQUF", "D009__M\u018fNS\u0130MOV NOB\u0130L SALEH": "D009__M\u018fNS\u0130MOV NOB\u0130L SALEH", "D009__ORUCOV \u018fL\u0130 M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD": "D009__ORUCOV \u018fL\u0130 M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD", "D009__QAFAROV KAMAL\u018fDD\u0130N N\u018fSR\u018fDD\u0130N": "D009__QAFAROV KAMAL\u018fDD\u0130N N\u018fSR\u018fDD\u0130N", "D009__Q\u018fD\u0130ROV MAH\u0130R RAS\u0130M": "D009__Q\u018fD\u0130ROV MAH\u0130R RAS\u0130M", "D009__R\u018fSULOV SAM\u0130R \u018fKB\u018fR": "D009__R\u018fSULOV SAM\u0130R \u018fKB\u018fR", "D009__S\u00dcLEYMANOV TO\u00c4\u009eRUL MAH\u00c4\u00b0R": "D009__S\u00dcLEYMANOV TO\u00c4\u009eRUL MAH\u00c4\u00b0R", "D010__EYYUBOV \u018fHM\u018fDA\u011eA S\u018fL\u0130M": "D010__EYYUBOV \u018fHM\u018fDA\u011eA S\u018fL\u0130M", "D010__H\u00dcSEYNOV H\u00dcMB\u00c6\u008fT R\u00c6\u008fH\u00c4\u00b0M": "D010__H\u00dcSEYNOV H\u00dcMB\u00c6\u008fT R\u00c6\u008fH\u00c4\u00b0M", "D010__H\u00dcSEYNOV ZAUR \u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0": "D010__H\u00dcSEYNOV ZAUR \u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0", "D010__H\u00dcSEYNOVA K\u00dcBRA RAS\u00c4\u00b0M": "D010__H\u00dcSEYNOVA K\u00dcBRA RAS\u00c4\u00b0M", "D010__MUSAYEV EL\u015eAD N\u018fB\u0130": "D010__MUSAYEV EL\u015eAD N\u018fB\u0130", "D010__M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDOV R\u00c6\u008f\u00c5\u009eAD N\u00dcR\u00c6\u008fDD\u00c4\u00b0N": "D010__M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDOV R\u00c6\u008f\u00c5\u009eAD N\u00dcR\u00c6\u008fDD\u00c4\u00b0N", "D010__M\u018fD\u018fTOVA LEYLA ABBAS\u018fL\u0130": "D010__M\u018fD\u018fTOVA LEYLA ABBAS\u018fL\u0130", "D010__N\u018fS\u0130BOVA AYDAN \u0130LQAR": "D010__N\u018fS\u0130BOVA AYDAN \u0130LQAR", "D010__\u0130SAYEV ELNUR MAL\u0130K": "D010__\u0130SAYEV ELNUR MAL\u0130K", "D010__\u018fM\u0130RASLANLI RAZ\u0130M MAL\u0130K\u018fJD\u018fR": "D010__\u018fM\u0130RASLANLI RAZ\u0130M MAL\u0130K\u018fJD\u018fR", "D010__\u018fS\u018fDULLAZAD\u018f M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD V\u0130DAD\u0130": "D010__\u018fS\u018fDULLAZAD\u018f M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD V\u0130DAD\u0130", "D011__ABBASOV N\u00c4\u00b0CAT M\u00dcSEY\u00c4\u00b0B": "D011__ABBASOV N\u00c4\u00b0CAT M\u00dcSEY\u00c4\u00b0B", "D011__ALI\u015eOV MURAD VALEH": "D011__ALI\u015eOV MURAD VALEH", "D011__ALLAHVERD\u0130YEVA M\u0130N\u018fXANIM ABDULLA": "D011__ALLAHVERD\u0130YEVA M\u0130N\u018fXANIM ABDULLA", "D011__C\u018fF\u018fROV TURAL \u018fKB\u018fR": "D011__C\u018fF\u018fROV TURAL \u018fKB\u018fR", "D011__H\u00c6\u008fS\u00c6\u008fNOVA G\u00dcNEL NAM\u00c4\u00b0Z\u00c6\u008fD": "D011__H\u00c6\u008fS\u00c6\u008fNOVA G\u00dcNEL NAM\u00c4\u00b0Z\u00c6\u008fD", "D011__MEHD\u0130YEV F\u018fXR\u018fDD\u0130N M\u018fH\u018fDD\u0130N": "D011__MEHD\u0130YEV F\u018fXR\u018fDD\u0130N M\u018fH\u018fDD\u0130N", "D011__M\u018fMM\u018fDZAD\u018f BEHBUD YA\u015eAR": "D011__M\u018fMM\u018fDZAD\u018f BEHBUD YA\u015eAR", "D011__QURBANLI V\u00dcSAL M\u00dcBAR\u00c4\u00b0Z": "D011__QURBANLI V\u00dcSAL M\u00dcBAR\u00c4\u00b0Z", "D011__XASAYEVA S\u018fB\u0130N\u018f S\u018fM\u018fD": "D011__XASAYEVA S\u018fB\u0130N\u018f S\u018fM\u018fD", "D011__YUSUBOV EM\u0130L FAZ\u0130L": "D011__YUSUBOV EM\u0130L FAZ\u0130L", "D011__\u00c4\u00b0BRAH\u00c4\u00b0MOV \u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0 Z\u00dcLF\u00dcQAR": "D011__\u00c4\u00b0BRAH\u00c4\u00b0MOV \u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0 Z\u00dcLF\u00dcQAR", "D011__\u018fL\u018fSG\u018fROV TELMAN N\u018fS\u0130M\u0130": "D011__\u018fL\u018fSG\u018fROV TELMAN N\u018fS\u0130M\u0130", "D012__BALLAYEVA LEYLA RAF\u0130Q": "D012__BALLAYEVA LEYLA RAF\u0130Q", "D012__D\u00c6\u008fM\u00c4\u00b0ROVA TAMARA Z\u00d6HRAB": "D012__D\u00c6\u008fM\u00c4\u00b0ROVA TAMARA Z\u00d6HRAB", "D012__F\u018fR\u018fCOV \u0130LK\u0130N ELDAR": "D012__F\u018fR\u018fCOV \u0130LK\u0130N ELDAR", "D012__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV SOLTAN TEYMUR": "D012__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV SOLTAN TEYMUR", "D012__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA ALMAZ \u018fL\u0130": "D012__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA ALMAZ \u018fL\u0130", "D012__N\u018fC\u018fFOV F\u018fRHAD QUL\u0130": "D012__N\u018fC\u018fFOV F\u018fRHAD QUL\u0130", "D012__P\u00c4\u00b0R\u00c4\u00b0YEVA P\u00c6\u008fRVAN\u00c6\u008f \u00c6\u008fL\u00d6VS\u00c6\u008fD": "D012__P\u00c4\u00b0R\u00c4\u00b0YEVA P\u00c6\u008fRVAN\u00c6\u008f \u00c6\u008fL\u00d6VS\u00c6\u008fD", "D012__QASIMOV TURAL ELMAR": "D012__QASIMOV TURAL ELMAR", "D012__S\u018fL\u0130MOV FA\u0130Q BABA \u018fL\u0130": "D012__S\u018fL\u0130MOV FA\u0130Q BABA \u018fL\u0130", "D012__\u00c4\u00b0BAZAD\u00c6\u008f G\u00dcNAY \u00c6\u008fL\u00d6VS\u00c6\u008fT": "D012__\u00c4\u00b0BAZAD\u00c6\u008f G\u00dcNAY \u00c6\u008fL\u00d6VS\u00c6\u008fT", "D012__\u015eAHVER\u018fNOVA SAN\u0130Y\u018f M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD": "D012__\u015eAHVER\u018fNOVA SAN\u0130Y\u018f M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD", "D012__\u018fL\u0130YEV \u018fL\u0130 M\u018fMM\u018fD": "D012__\u018fL\u0130YEV \u018fL\u0130 M\u018fMM\u018fD", "D012__\u018fL\u0130YEV \u018fL\u0130KRAM HACIA\u011eA": "D012__\u018fL\u0130YEV \u018fL\u0130KRAM HACIA\u011eA", "D013__CAVADOV \u00c5\u009e\u00dcK\u00dcR \u00c4\u00b0LQAR": "D013__CAVADOV \u00c5\u009e\u00dcK\u00dcR \u00c4\u00b0LQAR", "D013__H\u018fS\u018fNOVA TURAN AYDIN": "D013__H\u018fS\u018fNOVA TURAN AYDIN", "D013__MURADOVA SAM\u0130R\u018f SAB\u0130R": "D013__MURADOVA SAM\u0130R\u018f SAB\u0130R", "D013__M\u018fMM\u018fDL\u0130 \u018fH\u018fD F\u018fRHAD": "D013__M\u018fMM\u018fDL\u0130 \u018fH\u018fD F\u018fRHAD", "D013__PA\u00c5\u009eAYEVA G\u00dcL\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fD\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0": "D013__PA\u00c5\u009eAYEVA G\u00dcL\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fD\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0", "D013__POLADOV V\u00dcSAL XANLAR": "D013__POLADOV V\u00dcSAL XANLAR", "D013__QUL\u0130YEVA AYSEL T\u018fF\u015e\u0130R": "D013__QUL\u0130YEVA AYSEL T\u018fF\u015e\u0130R", "D013__ZA\u0130DOV M\u0130R\u018fZ\u0130M H\u018fS\u018fN": "D013__ZA\u0130DOV M\u0130R\u018fZ\u0130M H\u018fS\u018fN", "D013__\u0130MANOV \u0130MAM\u018fL\u0130 \u0130MANVERD\u0130": "D013__\u0130MANOV \u0130MAM\u018fL\u0130 \u0130MANVERD\u0130", "D013__\u018fL\u0130YEV C\u018fLAH\u0130R M\u0130RZ\u018fBALA": "D013__\u018fL\u0130YEV C\u018fLAH\u0130R M\u0130RZ\u018fBALA", "D014__BUN\u00c4\u00b0YATOVA MEHR\u00c4\u00b0BAN R\u00d6V\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN": "D014__BUN\u00c4\u00b0YATOVA MEHR\u00c4\u00b0BAN R\u00d6V\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN", "D014__QASIMLI G\u00dcL\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN CAMAL": "D014__QASIMLI G\u00dcL\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN CAMAL", "D014__R\u00c6\u008fSULOVA V\u00dcSAL\u00c6\u008f ELMAN": "D014__R\u00c6\u008fSULOVA V\u00dcSAL\u00c6\u008f ELMAN", "D014__S\u018fF\u018fROVA AYNUR M\u0130RZA\u011eA": "D014__S\u018fF\u018fROVA AYNUR M\u0130RZA\u011eA", "D014__\u00c6\u008fF\u00c6\u008fND\u00c4\u00b0YEVA G\u00dcNAY EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N": "D014__\u00c6\u008fF\u00c6\u008fND\u00c4\u00b0YEVA G\u00dcNAY EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N", "D014__\u018fL\u0130YEVA QUMRU A\u011eADD\u0130N": "D014__\u018fL\u0130YEVA QUMRU A\u011eADD\u0130N", "D014__\u018fZM\u018fMM\u018fDOV A\u011eABABA M\u0130RZ\u018fM\u018fMM\u018fD": "D014__\u018fZM\u018fMM\u018fDOV A\u011eABABA M\u0130RZ\u018fM\u018fMM\u018fD", "D015__DADA\u00c5\u009eOVA V\u00dcSAL\u00c6\u008f VALEH": "D015__DADA\u00c5\u009eOVA V\u00dcSAL\u00c6\u008f VALEH", "D015__H\u00dcSEYNOVA TURAN H\u00dcSEYN": "D015__H\u00dcSEYNOVA TURAN H\u00dcSEYN", "D015__M\u018fMM\u018fDL\u0130 ELCAN V\u018fL\u0130M\u018fMM\u018fD": "D015__M\u018fMM\u018fDL\u0130 ELCAN V\u018fL\u0130M\u018fMM\u018fD", "D015__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV EM\u0130L VAQ\u0130F": "D015__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV EM\u0130L VAQ\u0130F", "D015__QUL\u00c4\u00b0YEV \u00dcLV\u00c4\u00b0 ZAH\u00c4\u00b0D": "D015__QUL\u00c4\u00b0YEV \u00dcLV\u00c4\u00b0 ZAH\u00c4\u00b0D", "D015__QUL\u0130YEV \u018fL\u0130 D\u0130L\u018fN": "D015__QUL\u0130YEV \u018fL\u0130 D\u0130L\u018fN", "D015__SEYF\u018fLOV YUS\u0130F KAM\u0130L": "D015__SEYF\u018fLOV YUS\u0130F KAM\u0130L", "D015__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c6\u008fKB\u00c6\u008fROV V\u00dcQAR \u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0": "D015__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c6\u008fKB\u00c6\u008fROV V\u00dcQAR \u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0", "D015__\u015e\u018fR\u018fFXANLI \u018fRTURQUT N\u018fS\u0130M\u0130": "D015__\u015e\u018fR\u018fFXANLI \u018fRTURQUT N\u018fS\u0130M\u0130", "D015__\u018fL\u0130YEV TALEH M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD": "D015__\u018fL\u0130YEV TALEH M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD", "D016__ABBASOVA LAL\u00c6\u008f G\u00dcLBABA": "D016__ABBASOVA LAL\u00c6\u008f G\u00dcLBABA", "D016__ABDULLAYEVA MEHR\u0130BAN \u018fL\u0130": "D016__ABDULLAYEVA MEHR\u0130BAN \u018fL\u0130", "D016__AB\u0130YEV ALTAY QAD\u0130R": "D016__AB\u0130YEV ALTAY QAD\u0130R", "D016__BAYRAMOVA G\u00dcLP\u00c6\u008fR\u00c4\u00b0 AZ\u00c6\u008fR": "D016__BAYRAMOVA G\u00dcLP\u00c6\u008fR\u00c4\u00b0 AZ\u00c6\u008fR", "D016__MUSTAFAYEV EL\u015e\u018fN MANSUR": "D016__MUSTAFAYEV EL\u015e\u018fN MANSUR", "D016__M\u0130RZ\u018fYEV H\u018fB\u0130B AD\u0130L": "D016__M\u0130RZ\u018fYEV H\u018fB\u0130B AD\u0130L", "D016__ORUCOVA LEYLA ELMAN": "D016__ORUCOVA LEYLA ELMAN", "D016__Q\u018fD\u0130RL\u0130 ERK\u0130N TO\u011eRUL": "D016__Q\u018fD\u0130RL\u0130 ERK\u0130N TO\u011eRUL", "D016__\u018fL\u0130FXANOV FUAD \u018fHM\u018fDXAN": "D016__\u018fL\u0130FXANOV FUAD \u018fHM\u018fDXAN", "D017__BAYRAMOVA RUH\u0130YY\u018f \u018fL\u018fSG\u018fR": "D017__BAYRAMOVA RUH\u0130YY\u018f \u018fL\u018fSG\u018fR", "D017__HACIZAD\u00c6\u008f YAL\u00c7IN AK\u00c4\u00b0F": "D017__HACIZAD\u00c6\u008f YAL\u00c7IN AK\u00c4\u00b0F", "D017__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV ZAMAN R\u018f\u015e\u0130D": "D017__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV ZAMAN R\u018f\u015e\u0130D", "D017__N\u018fS\u0130BOVA TURAN\u018f MUSTAFA": "D017__N\u018fS\u0130BOVA TURAN\u018f MUSTAFA", "D017__Q\u00c6\u008fHR\u00c6\u008fMANOV G\u00d6YD\u00c6\u008fN\u00c4\u00b0Z \u00c4\u00b0BRAH\u00c4\u00b0M": "D017__Q\u00c6\u008fHR\u00c6\u008fMANOV G\u00d6YD\u00c6\u008fN\u00c4\u00b0Z \u00c4\u00b0BRAH\u00c4\u00b0M", "D017__R\u00c6\u008fH\u00c4\u00b0MOV M\u00dcT\u00c6\u008fLL\u00c4\u00b0M QARA": "D017__R\u00c6\u008fH\u00c4\u00b0MOV M\u00dcT\u00c6\u008fLL\u00c4\u00b0M QARA", "D017__SADIXLI N\u00dc\u00c5\u009eAB\u00c6\u008f A\u00c4\u009eABALA": "D017__SADIXLI N\u00dc\u00c5\u009eAB\u00c6\u008f A\u00c4\u009eABALA", "D017__\u018fB\u0130LOV AYDIN \u018fHM\u018fD": "D017__\u018fB\u0130LOV AYDIN \u018fHM\u018fD", "D017__\u018fSG\u018fROV CEYHUN F\u018fRHAD": "D017__\u018fSG\u018fROV CEYHUN F\u018fRHAD", "D018__ABBASOV XANLAR N\u00dcSR\u00c6\u008fT": "D018__ABBASOV XANLAR N\u00dcSR\u00c6\u008fT", "D018__BABA\u015eOV N\u0130ZAM\u0130 BABA\u015e": "D018__BABA\u015eOV N\u0130ZAM\u0130 BABA\u015e", "D018__H\u00c6\u008fS\u00c6\u008fNOVA T\u00dcRKAN \u00c5\u009eAK\u00c4\u00b0R": "D018__H\u00c6\u008fS\u00c6\u008fNOVA T\u00dcRKAN \u00c5\u009eAK\u00c4\u00b0R", "D018__MUSAB\u018fYOV RAS\u0130M N\u018fSR\u018fDD\u0130N": "D018__MUSAB\u018fYOV RAS\u0130M N\u018fSR\u018fDD\u0130N", "D018__M\u018fMM\u018fDZAD\u018f TURAL SAH\u0130B": "D018__M\u018fMM\u018fDZAD\u018f TURAL SAH\u0130B", "D018__S\u00dcLEYMANOV H\u00dcSEYN ALIXAN": "D018__S\u00dcLEYMANOV H\u00dcSEYN ALIXAN", "D018__TA\u00c4\u009eIYEV R\u00d6V\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN AS\u00c6\u008fF": "D018__TA\u00c4\u009eIYEV R\u00d6V\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN AS\u00c6\u008fF", "D018__\u018fL\u0130YEV ELDAR ELXAN": "D018__\u018fL\u0130YEV ELDAR ELXAN", "D018__\u018fL\u018fKB\u018fROV AZ\u018fR B\u0130LAL": "D018__\u018fL\u018fKB\u018fROV AZ\u018fR B\u0130LAL", "D019__M\u0130KAYILLI AD\u0130L EYNALI": "D019__M\u0130KAYILLI AD\u0130L EYNALI", "D019__M\u018fMM\u018fDL\u0130 AZ\u018fR AR\u0130F": "D019__M\u018fMM\u018fDL\u0130 AZ\u018fR AR\u0130F", "D019__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV H\u0130KM\u018fT BABA": "D019__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV H\u0130KM\u018fT BABA", "D019__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA AL\u0130Y\u018f TAR\u0130YEL": "D019__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA AL\u0130Y\u018f TAR\u0130YEL", "D019__ZEYNALOV MAH\u0130R H\u018fMZ\u018f": "D019__ZEYNALOV MAH\u0130R H\u018fMZ\u018f", "D019__\u018fL\u0130M\u0130RZ\u018fYEVA LAL\u018f Q\u018fZ\u018fNF\u018fR": "D019__\u018fL\u0130M\u0130RZ\u018fYEVA LAL\u018f Q\u018fZ\u018fNF\u018fR", "D020__A\u00c4\u009eAYEV ZAUR \u00c7\u00c4\u00b0NG\u00c4\u00b0Z": "D020__A\u00c4\u009eAYEV ZAUR \u00c7\u00c4\u00b0NG\u00c4\u00b0Z", "D020__B\u018fD\u018fLOV FUAD \u018fKR\u018fM": "D020__B\u018fD\u018fLOV FUAD \u018fKR\u018fM", "D020__N\u018fB\u0130YEV ORXAN AK\u0130F": "D020__N\u018fB\u0130YEV ORXAN AK\u0130F", "D020__N\u018fB\u0130ZAD\u018f B\u018fD\u0130H\u018f RAS\u0130M": "D020__N\u018fB\u0130ZAD\u018f B\u018fD\u0130H\u018f RAS\u0130M", "D020__Q\u00dcDR\u00c6\u008fTL\u00c4\u00b0 LAL\u00c6\u008f EYNULLA": "D020__Q\u00dcDR\u00c6\u008fTL\u00c4\u00b0 LAL\u00c6\u008f EYNULLA", "D020__V\u018fL\u0130YEV SAM\u0130R \u018fHM\u018fD": "D020__V\u018fL\u0130YEV SAM\u0130R \u018fHM\u018fD", "D020__YUS\u0130FL\u0130 RAH\u0130B Q\u018fD\u0130R": "D020__YUS\u0130FL\u0130 RAH\u0130B Q\u018fD\u0130R", "D020__\u015e\u0130R\u0130NOV EM\u0130N AR\u0130F": "D020__\u015e\u0130R\u0130NOV EM\u0130N AR\u0130F", "D021__ABBASLI TURAL FEYRUZ": "D021__ABBASLI TURAL FEYRUZ", "D021__ASLANLI G\u00dcLA\u00c4\u009eA QULAM": "D021__ASLANLI G\u00dcLA\u00c4\u009eA QULAM", "D021__H\u018fS\u018fNOVA M\u0130NAR\u018f H\u018fS\u018fN": "D021__H\u018fS\u018fNOVA M\u0130NAR\u018f H\u018fS\u018fN", "D021__SADIQOV FAZ\u0130L \u0130SLAM": "D021__SADIQOV FAZ\u0130L \u0130SLAM", "D021__V\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0YEV \u00c6\u008fL\u00c6\u008fSG\u00c6\u008fR H\u00dcSEYN": "D021__V\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0YEV \u00c6\u008fL\u00c6\u008fSG\u00c6\u008fR H\u00dcSEYN", "D021__\u0130BRAH\u0130MQIZI M\u018fLAH\u018fT \u0130BRAH\u0130M": "D021__\u0130BRAH\u0130MQIZI M\u018fLAH\u018fT \u0130BRAH\u0130M", "D021__\u0130SMAYILOVA REYHAN YUNUS": "D021__\u0130SMAYILOVA REYHAN YUNUS", "D022__A\u00c4\u009eAYEV \u00c4\u00b0LHAM M\u00dcSL\u00dcM": "D022__A\u00c4\u009eAYEV \u00c4\u00b0LHAM M\u00dcSL\u00dcM", "D022__H\u00dcSEYNOV XAL\u00c4\u00b0Q \u00c4\u00b0SA": "D022__H\u00dcSEYNOV XAL\u00c4\u00b0Q \u00c4\u00b0SA", "D022__MOLLAZAD\u018f AS\u0130M NAZ\u0130M": "D022__MOLLAZAD\u018f AS\u0130M NAZ\u0130M", "D022__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV \u0130LQAR ELDAR": "D022__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV \u0130LQAR ELDAR", "D022__R\u018fSULLU \u018fDV\u0130Y\u018f \u018fDAL\u018fT": "D022__R\u018fSULLU \u018fDV\u0130Y\u018f \u018fDAL\u018fT", "D022__\u0130SMAYILOV CAHANDAR CAHANG\u0130R": "D022__\u0130SMAYILOV CAHANDAR CAHANG\u0130R", "D022__\u015e\u0130R\u0130NOV RAM\u0130L R\u018fSUL": "D022__\u015e\u0130R\u0130NOV RAM\u0130L R\u018fSUL", "D022__\u018fHM\u018fDOVA X\u018fYAL\u018f BAYRAM": "D022__\u018fHM\u018fDOVA X\u018fYAL\u018f BAYRAM", "D023__BABAYEVA N\u0130GAR NAT\u0130Q": "D023__BABAYEVA N\u0130GAR NAT\u0130Q", "D023__QASIMOVA ELZA NURU": "D023__QASIMOVA ELZA NURU", "D023__R\u018fH\u0130MOV ELNUR F\u0130DA\u0130L": "D023__R\u018fH\u0130MOV ELNUR F\u0130DA\u0130L", "D023__S\u018fM\u018fDZAD\u018f Z\u0130YAD \u018fL\u0130ABBAS": "D023__S\u018fM\u018fDZAD\u018f Z\u0130YAD \u018fL\u0130ABBAS", "D023__TEM\u0130RXAN \u018fV\u018fZ B\u018fB\u0130RXAN": "D023__TEM\u0130RXAN \u018fV\u018fZ B\u018fB\u0130RXAN", "D023__TEYMUROV ARAZ MAH\u0130R": "D023__TEYMUROV ARAZ MAH\u0130R", "D023__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0YEV EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N TOF\u00c4\u00b0Q": "D023__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0YEV EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N TOF\u00c4\u00b0Q", "D023__\u00c6\u008fZ\u00c4\u00b0ZOV \u00c6\u008fZ\u00c4\u00b0Z FATEHOV\u00c4\u00b0\u00c7": "D023__\u00c6\u008fZ\u00c4\u00b0ZOV \u00c6\u008fZ\u00c4\u00b0Z FATEHOV\u00c4\u00b0\u00c7", "D023__\u0130SMAYILOV ELDAR \u0130SMAYIL": "D023__\u0130SMAYILOV ELDAR \u0130SMAYIL", "D023__\u0130SRAF\u0130LZAD\u018f \u018fL\u0130SAH\u0130B Q\u0130YAS": "D023__\u0130SRAF\u0130LZAD\u018f \u018fL\u0130SAH\u0130B Q\u0130YAS", "D024__HACIYEV ELMAR R\u018fH\u0130M": "D024__HACIYEV ELMAR R\u018fH\u0130M", "D024__K\u00c6\u008fR\u00c4\u00b0ML\u00c4\u00b0 \u00c6\u008fYYUB Z\u00d6HRAB": "D024__K\u00c6\u008fR\u00c4\u00b0ML\u00c4\u00b0 \u00c6\u008fYYUB Z\u00d6HRAB", "D024__NURULLAYEVA K\u00d6N\u00dcL ORUC": "D024__NURULLAYEVA K\u00d6N\u00dcL ORUC", "D024__NUR\u00c4\u00b0YEVA G\u00dcLNAR \u00c4\u00b0BAD\u00c6\u008fT": "D024__NUR\u00c4\u00b0YEVA G\u00dcLNAR \u00c4\u00b0BAD\u00c6\u008fT", "D024__R\u00dcST\u00c6\u008fMOV RAM\u00c4\u00b0L \u00c5\u009eAHSUVAR": "D024__R\u00dcST\u00c6\u008fMOV RAM\u00c4\u00b0L \u00c5\u009eAHSUVAR", "D024__Z\u00dcLF\u00dcQAROVA AYNUR VAQ\u00c4\u00b0F": "D024__Z\u00dcLF\u00dcQAROVA AYNUR VAQ\u00c4\u00b0F", "D024__\u00c5\u009e\u00dcK\u00dcROVA \u00dcLV\u00c4\u00b0YY\u00c6\u008f M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fD": "D024__\u00c5\u009e\u00dcK\u00dcROVA \u00dcLV\u00c4\u00b0YY\u00c6\u008f M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fD", "D024__\u015e\u0130RM\u018fMM\u018fDOV \u018fL\u0130YAR \u018fL\u0130\u015e": "D024__\u015e\u0130RM\u018fMM\u018fDOV \u018fL\u0130YAR \u018fL\u0130\u015e", "D025__HEYD\u018fROV RAUF \u0130SLAM": "D025__HEYD\u018fROV RAUF \u0130SLAM", "D025__H\u00dcSEYNOVA T\u00c6\u008fRAN\u00c6\u008f BAYRAM\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0": "D025__H\u00dcSEYNOVA T\u00c6\u008fRAN\u00c6\u008f BAYRAM\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0", "D025__MEHD\u0130YEV B\u018fHRAM M\u018fMM\u018fD": "D025__MEHD\u0130YEV B\u018fHRAM M\u018fMM\u018fD", "D025__QASIMOVA N\u018fRG\u0130Z A\u011eASADIQ": "D025__QASIMOVA N\u018fRG\u0130Z A\u011eASADIQ", "D025__QULUB\u018fYL\u0130 ELM\u018fDD\u0130N C\u018fF\u018fRQULU": "D025__QULUB\u018fYL\u0130 ELM\u018fDD\u0130N C\u018fF\u018fRQULU", "D025__\u0130SMAYILOV VAS\u0130F BULUDXAN": "D025__\u0130SMAYILOV VAS\u0130F BULUDXAN", "D025__\u018fHM\u018fDOV \u018fL\u0130 CAVAD": "D025__\u018fHM\u018fDOV \u018fL\u0130 CAVAD", "D026__A\u011eAYEV SAB\u0130R FA\u0130Q": "D026__A\u011eAYEV SAB\u0130R FA\u0130Q", "D026__BA\u011eIROV XAL\u0130D \u018fL\u0130": "D026__BA\u011eIROV XAL\u0130D \u018fL\u0130", "D026__HACIYEVA AFAQ \u015e\u0130RZAD": "D026__HACIYEVA AFAQ \u015e\u0130RZAD", "D026__H\u018fB\u0130BOVA FAT\u0130M\u018f F\u018fRHAD": "D026__H\u018fB\u0130BOVA FAT\u0130M\u018f F\u018fRHAD", "D026__K\u00c6\u008fR\u00c4\u00b0MZAD\u00c6\u008f TELMAN ADIG\u00d6Z\u00c6\u008fL": "D026__K\u00c6\u008fR\u00c4\u00b0MZAD\u00c6\u008f TELMAN ADIG\u00d6Z\u00c6\u008fL", "D026__MUSTAFA FAZ\u0130L Q\u018fZ\u018fNF\u018fR": "D026__MUSTAFA FAZ\u0130L Q\u018fZ\u018fNF\u018fR", "D026__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV N\u0130ZAM\u0130 H\u018fS\u018fN": "D026__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV N\u0130ZAM\u0130 H\u018fS\u018fN", "D026__QOCALI ANAR ARZU": "D026__QOCALI ANAR ARZU", "D027__ASLANOVA G\u00dcL\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN \u00c6\u008fB\u00c4\u00b0L": "D027__ASLANOVA G\u00dcL\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN \u00c6\u008fB\u00c4\u00b0L", "D027__ATAK\u0130\u015e\u0130YEVA ELNAR\u018f SAB\u0130R": "D027__ATAK\u0130\u015e\u0130YEVA ELNAR\u018f SAB\u0130R", "D027__BABAYEV \u018fL\u0130SEYRAN TAH\u0130R": "D027__BABAYEV \u018fL\u0130SEYRAN TAH\u0130R", "D027__BAXT\u0130YAROVA NURAN\u018f KAM\u0130L": "D027__BAXT\u0130YAROVA NURAN\u018f KAM\u0130L", "D027__H\u018fS\u018fNL\u0130 \u015e\u018fHR\u0130YAR \u018fLF\u018fDD\u0130N": "D027__H\u018fS\u018fNL\u0130 \u015e\u018fHR\u0130YAR \u018fLF\u018fDD\u0130N", "D027__MURADOV \u0130BRAH\u0130M AZ\u018fR": "D027__MURADOV \u0130BRAH\u0130M AZ\u018fR", "D027__QASIMOVA S\u018fB\u0130N\u018f M\u018fMM\u018fDA\u011eA": "D027__QASIMOVA S\u018fB\u0130N\u018f M\u018fMM\u018fDA\u011eA", "D027__\u018fL\u0130-ZAD\u018f ARZUXAN BAX\u015e\u018fL\u0130": "D027__\u018fL\u0130-ZAD\u018f ARZUXAN BAX\u015e\u018fL\u0130", "D028__H\u00dcSEYNOVA RAM\u00c4\u00b0L\u00c6\u008f \u00c6\u008fS\u00c6\u008fD": "D028__H\u00dcSEYNOVA RAM\u00c4\u00b0L\u00c6\u008f \u00c6\u008fS\u00c6\u008fD", "D028__H\u018fM\u0130DL\u0130 ASLAN FAZ\u0130L": "D028__H\u018fM\u0130DL\u0130 ASLAN FAZ\u0130L", "D028__K\u018fR\u0130MOVA MEHR\u0130BAN AZAD": "D028__K\u018fR\u0130MOVA MEHR\u0130BAN AZAD", "D028__QUL\u0130YEV ELDAR ALLAHYAR": "D028__QUL\u0130YEV ELDAR ALLAHYAR", "D028__QURBANOV TALEH M\u018fR\u0130F\u018fT": "D028__QURBANOV TALEH M\u018fR\u0130F\u018fT", "D028__RZAYEVA \u015e\u018fRQ\u0130YY\u018f RAF\u0130Q": "D028__RZAYEVA \u015e\u018fRQ\u0130YY\u018f RAF\u0130Q", "D028__\u0130SK\u018fND\u018fROV \u018fL\u0130 \u0130LHAM": "D028__\u0130SK\u018fND\u018fROV \u018fL\u0130 \u0130LHAM", "D028__\u018fSG\u018fRL\u0130 L\u018fMAN M\u018fNSUR": "D028__\u018fSG\u018fRL\u0130 L\u018fMAN M\u018fNSUR", "D029__ABDULLAZAD\u018f ERCAN AS\u018fF": "D029__ABDULLAZAD\u018f ERCAN AS\u018fF", "D029__ABDULLAZAD\u018f \u0130LAH\u018f \u0130NT\u0130QAM": "D029__ABDULLAZAD\u018f \u0130LAH\u018f \u0130NT\u0130QAM", "D029__ALLAHVER\u018fNOV AZ\u018fR K\u018fR\u0130M": "D029__ALLAHVER\u018fNOV AZ\u018fR K\u018fR\u0130M", "D029__BABAYEVA AYG\u00dcL AZ\u00c6\u008fR": "D029__BABAYEVA AYG\u00dcL AZ\u00c6\u008fR", "D029__MURADOV \u015eAH\u0130N YUS\u0130F": "D029__MURADOV \u015eAH\u0130N YUS\u0130F", "D029__YAQUBOV TAMERLAN N\u018fB\u0130": "D029__YAQUBOV TAMERLAN N\u018fB\u0130", "D029__\u018fL\u0130YEV N\u0130CAT ZAUR": "D029__\u018fL\u0130YEV N\u0130CAT ZAUR", "D030__ABBASOV YA\u015eAR \u018fL\u0130": "D030__ABBASOV YA\u015eAR \u018fL\u0130", "D030__BABAYEV RAC\u018fDD\u0130N H\u018f\u015e\u0130M": "D030__BABAYEV RAC\u018fDD\u0130N H\u018f\u015e\u0130M", "D030__F\u018fT\u018fL\u0130YEVA SEV\u0130NC H\u018fB\u0130B": "D030__F\u018fT\u018fL\u0130YEVA SEV\u0130NC H\u018fB\u0130B", "D030__MEHD\u0130YEV \u0130MRAN KAMAL": "D030__MEHD\u0130YEV \u0130MRAN KAMAL", "D030__SADIQOVA \u0130LAH\u018f ARTUR": "D030__SADIQOVA \u0130LAH\u018f ARTUR", "D030__TA\u011eIYEVA R\u018fQSAN\u018f FAM\u0130L": "D030__TA\u011eIYEVA R\u018fQSAN\u018f FAM\u0130L", "D030__X\u018fL\u0130LOV X\u018fYYAM ELBURUS": "D030__X\u018fL\u0130LOV X\u018fYYAM ELBURUS", "D031__BULUD \u018fRZULLA \u018f\u015eR\u018fF": "D031__BULUD \u018fRZULLA \u018f\u015eR\u018fF", "D031__MAHMUDOV MAHMUD AVDI": "D031__MAHMUDOV MAHMUD AVDI", "D031__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV QAYA M\u018fMM\u018fD": "D031__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV QAYA M\u018fMM\u018fD", "D031__QASIMOV V\u00dcQAR CAVAD": "D031__QASIMOV V\u00dcQAR CAVAD", "D031__QUL\u0130YEV ET\u0130BAR \u018fL\u0130A\u011eA": "D031__QUL\u0130YEV ET\u0130BAR \u018fL\u0130A\u011eA", "D031__S\u018fRDARLI AYT\u018fN TURAL": "D031__S\u018fRDARLI AYT\u018fN TURAL", "D031__TA\u011eIYEV \u015eAM\u0130L \u018fNV\u018fR": "D031__TA\u011eIYEV \u015eAM\u0130L \u018fNV\u018fR", "D031__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c6\u008fKB\u00c6\u008fROV H\u00c6\u008fB\u00c4\u00b0B M\u00dcZ\u00c6\u008fFF\u00c6\u008fR": "D031__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c6\u008fKB\u00c6\u008fROV H\u00c6\u008fB\u00c4\u00b0B M\u00dcZ\u00c6\u008fFF\u00c6\u008fR", "D032__H\u018fS\u018fNOVA AF\u018fT \u018fB\u0130L": "D032__H\u018fS\u018fNOVA AF\u018fT \u018fB\u0130L", "D032__M\u0130RZ\u018fYEVA YEGAN\u018f B\u0130LAL": "D032__M\u0130RZ\u018fYEVA YEGAN\u018f B\u0130LAL", "D032__QUL\u0130YEV \u0130LQAR MAY": "D032__QUL\u0130YEV \u0130LQAR MAY", "D032__QUL\u0130YEV \u018fFQAN B\u018fHLUL": "D032__QUL\u0130YEV \u018fFQAN B\u018fHLUL", "D032__S\u018fL\u0130MOV CAVAD S\u018fL\u0130M": "D032__S\u018fL\u0130MOV CAVAD S\u018fL\u0130M", "D032__\u00c5\u009eIXIYEVA \u00dcLV\u00c4\u00b0YY\u00c6\u008f CAHANDAR": "D032__\u00c5\u009eIXIYEVA \u00dcLV\u00c4\u00b0YY\u00c6\u008f CAHANDAR", "D032__\u018fL\u0130S\u018fFAZAD\u018f ANAR \u018fL\u0130S\u018fFA": "D032__\u018fL\u0130S\u018fFAZAD\u018f ANAR \u018fL\u0130S\u018fFA", "D033__ABBASOV FUAD MAL\u0130K": "D033__ABBASOV FUAD MAL\u0130K", "D033__ATAK\u0130\u015e\u0130YEV NAMUS HACI": "D033__ATAK\u0130\u015e\u0130YEV NAMUS HACI", "D033__CAHANG\u0130ROV XAL\u0130DD\u0130N BALO\u011eLAN": "D033__CAHANG\u0130ROV XAL\u0130DD\u0130N BALO\u011eLAN", "D033__C\u018fF\u018fROV NAT\u0130Q MEHMAN": "D033__C\u018fF\u018fROV NAT\u0130Q MEHMAN", "D033__M\u018fMM\u018fDL\u0130 KAMRAN F\u018fRHAD": "D033__M\u018fMM\u018fDL\u0130 KAMRAN F\u018fRHAD", "D033__NEM\u018fTOVA ELNUR\u018f OQTAY": "D033__NEM\u018fTOVA ELNUR\u018f OQTAY", "D033__ORUC ZAH\u0130D M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fM": "D033__ORUC ZAH\u0130D M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fM", "D033__S\u018fF\u018fRL\u0130 AYSEL XANLAR": "D033__S\u018fF\u018fRL\u0130 AYSEL XANLAR", "D033__X\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0LOVA G\u00dcLNAR F\u00c6\u008fRMAYIL": "D033__X\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0LOVA G\u00dcLNAR F\u00c6\u008fRMAYIL", "D033__\u018fL\u0130YEV AR\u0130F M\u018fMM\u018fD": "D033__\u018fL\u0130YEV AR\u0130F M\u018fMM\u018fD", "D033__\u018fL\u0130YEV YENG\u0130BAR S\u018fRRAF": "D033__\u018fL\u0130YEV YENG\u0130BAR S\u018fRRAF", "D034__C\u018fF\u018fROV F\u0130KR\u018fT \u0130LYAS": "D034__C\u018fF\u018fROV F\u0130KR\u018fT \u0130LYAS", "D034__HACIYEV \u015eAHLAR \u018fHM\u018fD": "D034__HACIYEV \u015eAHLAR \u018fHM\u018fD", "D034__HACIYEVA V\u00c6\u008fS\u00c4\u00b0L\u00c6\u008f C\u00dcM\u00c5\u009e\u00dcD": "D034__HACIYEVA V\u00c6\u008fS\u00c4\u00b0L\u00c6\u008f C\u00dcM\u00c5\u009e\u00dcD", "D034__H\u00dcSEYNOV ZAK\u00c4\u00b0R H\u00dcSEYN": "D034__H\u00dcSEYNOV ZAK\u00c4\u00b0R H\u00dcSEYN", "D034__H\u00dcSEY\u00c4\u00b0NOV H\u00dcSEY\u00c4\u00b0N NAM\u00c4\u00b0K": "D034__H\u00dcSEY\u00c4\u00b0NOV H\u00dcSEY\u00c4\u00b0N NAM\u00c4\u00b0K", "D034__M\u00c4\u00b0RHEYD\u00c6\u008fRL\u00c4\u00b0 T\u00dcRKAY M\u00c4\u00b0RFA\u00c4\u00b0Q": "D034__M\u00c4\u00b0RHEYD\u00c6\u008fRL\u00c4\u00b0 T\u00dcRKAY M\u00c4\u00b0RFA\u00c4\u00b0Q", "D034__QASIMZAD\u018f N\u0130CAT \u018fRR\u018fHMAN": "D034__QASIMZAD\u018f N\u0130CAT \u018fRR\u018fHMAN", "D034__ZABEL\u00c4\u00b0N M\u00c4\u00b0XA\u00c4\u00b0L YURYEV\u00c4\u00b0\u00c7": "D034__ZABEL\u00c4\u00b0N M\u00c4\u00b0XA\u00c4\u00b0L YURYEV\u00c4\u00b0\u00c7", "D035__H\u00dcSEYNZAD\u00c6\u008f TURAL COM\u00c6\u008fRD": "D035__H\u00dcSEYNZAD\u00c6\u008f TURAL COM\u00c6\u008fRD", "D035__H\u018fS\u018fNOV QASIM R\u018fH\u0130M": "D035__H\u018fS\u018fNOV QASIM R\u018fH\u0130M", "D035__H\u018fT\u018fMOV TOF\u0130Q KAM\u0130L": "D035__H\u018fT\u018fMOV TOF\u0130Q KAM\u0130L", "D035__SAYADLI ET\u0130BAR ELMAR": "D035__SAYADLI ET\u0130BAR ELMAR", "D035__VAHABOV ELNUR RAM\u00c4\u00b0ZOV\u00c4\u00b0\u00c7": "D035__VAHABOV ELNUR RAM\u00c4\u00b0ZOV\u00c4\u00b0\u00c7", "D035__V\u018fL\u0130YEVA P\u018fRVAN\u018f BULUT": "D035__V\u018fL\u0130YEVA P\u018fRVAN\u018f BULUT", "D035__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0YEVA V\u00dcSAL\u00c6\u008f MUSA": "D035__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0YEVA V\u00dcSAL\u00c6\u008f MUSA", "D035__\u018fL\u0130YEV B\u018fYBALA \u018f\u015eR\u018fF": "D035__\u018fL\u0130YEV B\u018fYBALA \u018f\u015eR\u018fF", "D036__A\u011eAZAD\u018f \u018fNV\u018fR S\u018fRDAR": "D036__A\u011eAZAD\u018f \u018fNV\u018fR S\u018fRDAR", "D036__EYYUBOV \u015eAK\u0130R MUSA": "D036__EYYUBOV \u015eAK\u0130R MUSA", "D036__HACIYEVA N\u018fRM\u0130N\u018f ASLAN": "D036__HACIYEVA N\u018fRM\u0130N\u018f ASLAN", "D036__H\u00c6\u008fS\u00c6\u008fNQUL\u00c4\u00b0YEV Q\u00dcDR\u00c6\u008fT M\u00dcZ\u00c6\u008fFF\u00c6\u008fR": "D036__H\u00c6\u008fS\u00c6\u008fNQUL\u00c4\u00b0YEV Q\u00dcDR\u00c6\u008fT M\u00dcZ\u00c6\u008fFF\u00c6\u008fR", "D036__KELEXSAYEVA OKSANA VYA\u00c7ESLAVOVNA": "D036__KELEXSAYEVA OKSANA VYA\u00c7ESLAVOVNA", "D036__P\u0130R\u0130YEV V\u018fK\u0130L BA\u011eMAN": "D036__P\u0130R\u0130YEV V\u018fK\u0130L BA\u011eMAN", "D036__\u0130MANOV TOF\u0130Q HAQVERD\u0130": "D036__\u0130MANOV TOF\u0130Q HAQVERD\u0130", "D037__H\u00c6\u008fS\u00c6\u008fNL\u00c4\u00b0 V\u00dcSAL OKTAY": "D037__H\u00c6\u008fS\u00c6\u008fNL\u00c4\u00b0 V\u00dcSAL OKTAY", "D037__H\u00dcSEYNOV AYDIN N\u00c6\u008fS\u00c4\u00b0R": "D037__H\u00dcSEYNOV AYDIN N\u00c6\u008fS\u00c4\u00b0R", "D037__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV N\u0130ZAM\u018fDD\u0130N F\u018fRZALI": "D037__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV N\u0130ZAM\u018fDD\u0130N F\u018fRZALI", "D037__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV SAM\u0130R AD\u0130L": "D037__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV SAM\u0130R AD\u0130L", "D037__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV TARYEL M\u018fD\u018fT": "D037__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV TARYEL M\u018fD\u018fT", "D037__PA\u015eAYEV KAM\u0130L \u018f\u015eR\u018fF": "D037__PA\u015eAYEV KAM\u0130L \u018f\u015eR\u018fF", "D037__SALAHOVA S\u018fB\u0130N\u018f OKTAY": "D037__SALAHOVA S\u018fB\u0130N\u018f OKTAY", "D037__ZEYNALOV AR\u0130Z XUDAVERD\u0130": "D037__ZEYNALOV AR\u0130Z XUDAVERD\u0130", "D038__CABBAROV R\u018f\u015eAD VAS\u0130F": "D038__CABBAROV R\u018f\u015eAD VAS\u0130F", "D038__H\u018fMZ\u018fYEV NAQ\u0130F \u018fL\u018f\u015eR\u018fF": "D038__H\u018fMZ\u018fYEV NAQ\u0130F \u018fL\u018f\u015eR\u018fF", "D038__MAHMUDOV \u00c5\u009eA\u00c4\u00b0B S\u00dcLEYMAN": "D038__MAHMUDOV \u00c5\u009eA\u00c4\u00b0B S\u00dcLEYMAN", "D038__QURBANOV RAUF M\u00dcSL\u00dcM": "D038__QURBANOV RAUF M\u00dcSL\u00dcM", "D038__ZEYNALOV OQTAY Q\u018fMB\u018fR": "D038__ZEYNALOV OQTAY Q\u018fMB\u018fR", "D038__\u0130SMAYILOV ORXAN MEHMAN": "D038__\u0130SMAYILOV ORXAN MEHMAN", "D038__\u018fHM\u018fDL\u0130 AR\u0130F\u018f ABBAS\u018fL\u0130": "D038__\u018fHM\u018fDL\u0130 AR\u0130F\u018f ABBAS\u018fL\u0130", "D039__ASLANOV ELDAR ZAB\u0130T": "D039__ASLANOV ELDAR ZAB\u0130T", "D039__K\u018fR\u0130MZAD\u018f P\u018fRV\u0130N ORXAN": "D039__K\u018fR\u0130MZAD\u018f P\u018fRV\u0130N ORXAN", "D039__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV AR\u0130F \u015eAHM\u018fDD\u0130N": "D039__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV AR\u0130F \u015eAHM\u018fDD\u0130N", "D039__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA AYT\u018fN RAF\u0130Q": "D039__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA AYT\u018fN RAF\u0130Q", "D039__N\u00c6\u008fC\u00c6\u008fFOV EL\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN H\u00d6KUM\u00c6\u008fT": "D039__N\u00c6\u008fC\u00c6\u008fFOV EL\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN H\u00d6KUM\u00c6\u008fT", "D039__ORUCOVA S\u018fFA \u0130SLAM": "D039__ORUCOVA S\u018fFA \u0130SLAM", "D039__QASIMOV \u00c5\u009eAH\u00c6\u008fDD\u00c4\u00b0N Q\u00dcDR\u00c6\u008fT": "D039__QASIMOV \u00c5\u009eAH\u00c6\u008fDD\u00c4\u00b0N Q\u00dcDR\u00c6\u008fT", "D039__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0YEVA G\u00dcNEL M\u00c4\u00b0R\u00c6\u008fHM\u00c6\u008fD": "D039__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0YEVA G\u00dcNEL M\u00c4\u00b0R\u00c6\u008fHM\u00c6\u008fD", "D040__D\u00dcNYAMALIYEV \u00c6\u008fKB\u00c6\u008fR SAB\u00c4\u00b0R": "D040__D\u00dcNYAMALIYEV \u00c6\u008fKB\u00c6\u008fR SAB\u00c4\u00b0R", "D040__H\u018fN\u0130F\u018fYEVA S\u018fB\u0130N\u018f ELMAN": "D040__H\u018fN\u0130F\u018fYEVA S\u018fB\u0130N\u018f ELMAN", "D040__QUL\u0130YEV MUSA \u0130SA": "D040__QUL\u0130YEV MUSA \u0130SA", "D040__UMAN\u0130 AR\u0130F EM\u0130N": "D040__UMAN\u0130 AR\u0130F EM\u0130N", "D040__V\u018fL\u0130YEV MAYIL V\u018fL\u0130": "D040__V\u018fL\u0130YEV MAYIL V\u018fL\u0130", "D040__\u00c4\u00b0SMAYILOV EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N VALEH": "D040__\u00c4\u00b0SMAYILOV EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N VALEH", "D040__\u0130MANLI SALMAN M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD": "D040__\u0130MANLI SALMAN M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD", "D041__A\u00c4\u009eAYEVA G\u00dcLDAN\u00c6\u008f YUN\u00c4\u00b0S": "D041__A\u00c4\u009eAYEVA G\u00dcLDAN\u00c6\u008f YUN\u00c4\u00b0S", "D041__C\u00c6\u008fF\u00c6\u008fROV M\u00dc\u00c5\u009eF\u00c4\u00b0Q C\u00c6\u008fF\u00c6\u008fR": "D041__C\u00c6\u008fF\u00c6\u008fROV M\u00dc\u00c5\u009eF\u00c4\u00b0Q C\u00c6\u008fF\u00c6\u008fR", "D041__QASIMOV KAM\u0130L NAD\u0130R": "D041__QASIMOV KAM\u0130L NAD\u0130R", "D041__\u00c6\u008fS\u00c6\u008fDOV MUXTAR SEYFULLAYEV\u00c4\u00b0\u00c7": "D041__\u00c6\u008fS\u00c6\u008fDOV MUXTAR SEYFULLAYEV\u00c4\u00b0\u00c7", "D041__\u0130SK\u018fND\u018fRL\u0130 TO\u011eRUL SAYAD": "D041__\u0130SK\u018fND\u018fRL\u0130 TO\u011eRUL SAYAD", "D041__\u018fL\u0130YEV CEYHUN M\u018fMM\u018fD": "D041__\u018fL\u0130YEV CEYHUN M\u018fMM\u018fD", "D041__\u018fL\u0130YEVA NA\u0130L\u018f \u0130SLAM": "D041__\u018fL\u0130YEVA NA\u0130L\u018f \u0130SLAM", "D042__ABASOV \u018fYYUB Q\u0130YAS": "D042__ABASOV \u018fYYUB Q\u0130YAS", "D042__ABDULLAYEV KAM\u0130L XAL\u0130Q": "D042__ABDULLAYEV KAM\u0130L XAL\u0130Q", "D042__A\u011eAYEV RAM\u0130L VAH\u0130D": "D042__A\u011eAYEV RAM\u0130L VAH\u0130D", "D042__BA\u011eIROV R\u018fYAS\u018fT M\u018fMM\u018fDA\u011eA": "D042__BA\u011eIROV R\u018fYAS\u018fT M\u018fMM\u018fDA\u011eA", "D042__B\u018fD\u018fLOV KAM\u0130L \u015e\u0130RXAN": "D042__B\u018fD\u018fLOV KAM\u0130L \u015e\u0130RXAN", "D042__H\u00dcSEYNOVA H\u00c4\u00b0CRAN KAMRAN": "D042__H\u00dcSEYNOVA H\u00c4\u00b0CRAN KAMRAN", "D042__MAHMUDOVA F\u0130DAN M\u0130RFUAD": "D042__MAHMUDOVA F\u0130DAN M\u0130RFUAD", "D042__MAHMUDOVA YAS\u018fM\u018fN TA\u011eI": "D042__MAHMUDOVA YAS\u018fM\u018fN TA\u011eI", "D042__MAYILOVA \u015e\u018fF\u018fQ NOF\u018fL": "D042__MAYILOVA \u015e\u018fF\u018fQ NOF\u018fL", "D042__QUL\u0130YEVA ULDUZ \u0130SM\u0130XAN": "D042__QUL\u0130YEVA ULDUZ \u0130SM\u0130XAN", "D042__SALAH K\u018fRAM\u018fT SALAM": "D042__SALAH K\u018fRAM\u018fT SALAM", "D043__ABBASLI N\u018fRM\u0130N \u0130KRAM": "D043__ABBASLI N\u018fRM\u0130N \u0130KRAM", "D043__CAVADLI CAVAD ADI\u015e\u0130R\u0130N": "D043__CAVADLI CAVAD ADI\u015e\u0130R\u0130N", "D043__F\u018fTTAYEV M\u0130RMAHMUD M\u0130R\u018fL\u0130": "D043__F\u018fTTAYEV M\u0130RMAHMUD M\u0130R\u018fL\u0130", "D043__H\u00dcSEYNOV ANAR \u00c4\u00b0SF\u00c6\u008fND\u00c4\u00b0YAR": "D043__H\u00dcSEYNOV ANAR \u00c4\u00b0SF\u00c6\u008fND\u00c4\u00b0YAR", "D043__M\u0130RK\u0130\u015e\u0130L\u0130 TAH\u0130R FAM\u0130L": "D043__M\u0130RK\u0130\u015e\u0130L\u0130 TAH\u0130R FAM\u0130L", "D043__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA K\u018fMAL\u018f BAYRAM": "D043__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA K\u018fMAL\u018f BAYRAM", "D043__R\u00c6\u008fC\u00c6\u008fBOV ZAUR G\u00dcL\u00c6\u008fHM\u00c6\u008fD": "D043__R\u00c6\u008fC\u00c6\u008fBOV ZAUR G\u00dcL\u00c6\u008fHM\u00c6\u008fD", "D043__SALMANLI YUS\u0130F Z\u0130YAD": "D043__SALMANLI YUS\u0130F Z\u0130YAD", "D043__\u018fF\u018fND\u0130YEV VAS\u0130F VAQ\u0130F": "D043__\u018fF\u018fND\u0130YEV VAS\u0130F VAQ\u0130F", "D043__\u018fL\u0130CANOV TALEH \u018fKR\u018fM": "D043__\u018fL\u0130CANOV TALEH \u018fKR\u018fM", "D043__\u018fL\u0130YEV ORXAN HEYB\u018fT": "D043__\u018fL\u0130YEV ORXAN HEYB\u018fT", "D044__BAYRAMOV AK\u0130F \u018fL\u0130F": "D044__BAYRAMOV AK\u0130F \u018fL\u0130F", "D044__K\u018fR\u0130MOVA S\u018fB\u0130N\u018f AQ\u0130L": "D044__K\u018fR\u0130MOVA S\u018fB\u0130N\u018f AQ\u0130L", "D044__MANSURZAD\u018f MANSUR ELXAN": "D044__MANSURZAD\u018f MANSUR ELXAN", "D044__V\u018fL\u0130YEVA MEHR\u0130BAN H\u0130DAY\u018fT": "D044__V\u018fL\u0130YEVA MEHR\u0130BAN H\u0130DAY\u018fT", "D044__\u00c5\u009e\u00dcK\u00dcROV SALEH M\u00c6\u008fHZUN": "D044__\u00c5\u009e\u00dcK\u00dcROV SALEH M\u00c6\u008fHZUN", "D044__\u00c6\u008fZ\u00c4\u00b0ZOVA R\u00dcBAB\u00c6\u008f \u00c4\u00b0LQAR": "D044__\u00c6\u008fZ\u00c4\u00b0ZOVA R\u00dcBAB\u00c6\u008f \u00c4\u00b0LQAR", "D044__\u0130MANOV DUNAY YUS\u0130F": "D044__\u0130MANOV DUNAY YUS\u0130F", "D044__\u0130SMAYILOVA \u015e\u018fHLA YAD\u0130GAR": "D044__\u0130SMAYILOVA \u015e\u018fHLA YAD\u0130GAR", "D045__ABDULLAYEV V\u00dcQAR \u00c4\u00b0LT\u00c4\u00b0FAT": "D045__ABDULLAYEV V\u00dcQAR \u00c4\u00b0LT\u00c4\u00b0FAT", "D045__ALIYEV A\u011eAM\u0130R X\u018fL\u0130L": "D045__ALIYEV A\u011eAM\u0130R X\u018fL\u0130L", "D045__ALLAHVERD\u00c4\u00b0L\u00c4\u00b0 K\u00d6N\u00dcL MAXSUD": "D045__ALLAHVERD\u00c4\u00b0L\u00c4\u00b0 K\u00d6N\u00dcL MAXSUD", "D045__HACIYEV NA\u0130B \u0130SM\u0130XAN": "D045__HACIYEV NA\u0130B \u0130SM\u0130XAN", "D045__MURADZAD\u018f ARAZ ELMAN": "D045__MURADZAD\u018f ARAZ ELMAN", "D045__QASIMOV AZ\u018fR M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fM": "D045__QASIMOV AZ\u018fR M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fM", "D045__SALMANOVA S\u018fB\u0130N\u018f Q\u018fD\u0130R": "D045__SALMANOVA S\u018fB\u0130N\u018f Q\u018fD\u0130R", "D046__AK\u0130MOVA ELNAR\u018f SEYDULLA": "D046__AK\u0130MOVA ELNAR\u018f SEYDULLA", "D046__CAMALOV EL\u015e\u018fN M\u018fMM\u018fDABA": "D046__CAMALOV EL\u015e\u018fN M\u018fMM\u018fDABA", "D046__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV R\u018f\u015e\u0130D M\u018fMM\u018fD": "D046__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV R\u018f\u015e\u0130D M\u018fMM\u018fD", "D046__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA C\u018fM\u0130L\u018f ZAK\u0130R": "D046__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA C\u018fM\u0130L\u018f ZAK\u0130R", "D046__QAFAROV \u018fDAL\u018fT \u0130ZZ\u018fT": "D046__QAFAROV \u018fDAL\u018fT \u0130ZZ\u018fT", "D046__\u018fZ\u0130ZOVA \u015e\u018fF\u0130Q\u018f YUS\u0130F": "D046__\u018fZ\u0130ZOVA \u015e\u018fF\u0130Q\u018f YUS\u0130F", "D047__H\u018fS\u018fNOVA L\u018fTAF\u018fT AR\u0130F": "D047__H\u018fS\u018fNOVA L\u018fTAF\u018fT AR\u0130F", "D047__K\u018fR\u0130MOVA NURAD\u018f M\u018fMM\u018fDRZA": "D047__K\u018fR\u0130MOVA NURAD\u018f M\u018fMM\u018fDRZA", "D047__MUSTAFAYEV MUSA MUSA": "D047__MUSTAFAYEV MUSA MUSA", "D047__N\u018fB\u0130YEV EM\u0130N TOF\u0130Q": "D047__N\u018fB\u0130YEV EM\u0130N TOF\u0130Q", "D047__N\u018fZ\u018fROVA SONA R\u018f\u015eAD": "D047__N\u018fZ\u018fROVA SONA R\u018f\u015eAD", "D047__QARAYEVA S\u018fB\u0130N\u018f VALEH": "D047__QARAYEVA S\u018fB\u0130N\u018f VALEH", "D047__\u00c5\u009e\u00dcK\u00dcROV ZAUR RAM\u00c4\u00b0Z": "D047__\u00c5\u009e\u00dcK\u00dcROV ZAUR RAM\u00c4\u00b0Z", "D048__ALIYEV YAL\u00c7IN M\u00c6\u008fM\u00c4\u00b0\u00c5\u009e": "D048__ALIYEV YAL\u00c7IN M\u00c6\u008fM\u00c4\u00b0\u00c5\u009e", "D048__M\u0130KAYILZAD\u018f SEVDA VAS\u0130F": "D048__M\u0130KAYILZAD\u018f SEVDA VAS\u0130F", "D048__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA N\u0130GAR F\u0130KR\u018fT": "D048__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA N\u0130GAR F\u0130KR\u018fT", "D048__XUDAVERD\u0130YEV RAS\u0130M M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD": "D048__XUDAVERD\u0130YEV RAS\u0130M M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD", "D048__\u00c6\u008fHM\u00c6\u008fDZAD\u00c6\u008f R\u00c6\u008fH\u00c4\u00b0M R\u00dcF\u00c6\u008fT": "D048__\u00c6\u008fHM\u00c6\u008fDZAD\u00c6\u008f R\u00c6\u008fH\u00c4\u00b0M R\u00dcF\u00c6\u008fT", "D048__\u0130SRAYILOV M\u018fZAH\u0130R \u0130SRAYIL": "D048__\u0130SRAYILOV M\u018fZAH\u0130R \u0130SRAYIL", "D049__ALLAHVERD\u0130YEV ELBRUS \u015eAK\u0130R": "D049__ALLAHVERD\u0130YEV ELBRUS \u015eAK\u0130R", "D049__AZAD\u018fL\u0130YEV Q\u018fR\u0130B\u018fL\u0130 M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD\u018fL\u0130": "D049__AZAD\u018fL\u0130YEV Q\u018fR\u0130B\u018fL\u0130 M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD\u018fL\u0130", "D049__H\u00dcSEYNOVA ARZU RAF\u00c4\u00b0Q": "D049__H\u00dcSEYNOVA ARZU RAF\u00c4\u00b0Q", "D049__N\u018fB\u0130YEV R\u0130ZVAN NOVRUZ": "D049__N\u018fB\u0130YEV R\u0130ZVAN NOVRUZ", "D049__XUDAYEV FA\u0130Q ALLAHVERD\u0130": "D049__XUDAYEV FA\u0130Q ALLAHVERD\u0130", "D049__\u0130SG\u018fND\u018fROV AZ\u018fR Q\u018fNB\u018fR": "D049__\u0130SG\u018fND\u018fROV AZ\u018fR Q\u018fNB\u018fR", "D050__ALLAHVERD\u0130YEV \u0130BRAH\u0130M EL\u015eAD": "D050__ALLAHVERD\u0130YEV \u0130BRAH\u0130M EL\u015eAD", "D050__AXUNDOVA NURAN\u018f TOF\u0130Q": "D050__AXUNDOVA NURAN\u018f TOF\u0130Q", "D050__DAVUDOVA B\u00c4\u00b0LD\u00c4\u00b0R\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N TA\u00c4\u009eI": "D050__DAVUDOVA B\u00c4\u00b0LD\u00c4\u00b0R\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N TA\u00c4\u009eI", "D050__HEYD\u018fROV ELDAR HEYD\u018fR": "D050__HEYD\u018fROV ELDAR HEYD\u018fR", "D050__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV A\u011eA\u015e\u0130R\u0130N \u018fL\u0130": "D050__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV A\u011eA\u015e\u0130R\u0130N \u018fL\u0130", "D050__NAMAZOV RAM\u0130D ZAK\u0130R": "D050__NAMAZOV RAM\u0130D ZAK\u0130R", "D050__ORDUXANLI N\u0130YAM\u018fDD\u0130N ORDUXAN": "D050__ORDUXANLI N\u0130YAM\u018fDD\u0130N ORDUXAN", "D051__B\u018f\u015e\u0130RL\u0130 \u018fL\u0130 ALLAHVERD\u0130": "D051__B\u018f\u015e\u0130RL\u0130 \u018fL\u0130 ALLAHVERD\u0130", "D051__C\u018fF\u018fROV ASLAN \u015eAHM\u0130RZ\u018f": "D051__C\u018fF\u018fROV ASLAN \u015eAHM\u0130RZ\u018f", "D051__C\u018fL\u0130LOVA \u0130RAD\u018f YAV\u018fR": "D051__C\u018fL\u0130LOVA \u0130RAD\u018f YAV\u018fR", "D051__M\u018fL\u0130KOV NAS\u0130R NAZ\u0130M": "D051__M\u018fL\u0130KOV NAS\u0130R NAZ\u0130M", "D051__NOVRUZOV VAS\u0130F M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fM": "D051__NOVRUZOV VAS\u0130F M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fM", "D051__NURAL\u0130YEV \u0130LK\u0130N \u0130LHAM": "D051__NURAL\u0130YEV \u0130LK\u0130N \u0130LHAM", "D051__SADIQOV PEYMAN AK\u0130F": "D051__SADIQOV PEYMAN AK\u0130F", "D051__\u00c4\u00b0SMAYILOV Z\u00d6HRAB VAH\u00c4\u00b0D": "D051__\u00c4\u00b0SMAYILOV Z\u00d6HRAB VAH\u00c4\u00b0D", "D051__\u015eIX\u018fL\u0130YEV CO\u015eQUN SARVAN": "D051__\u015eIX\u018fL\u0130YEV CO\u015eQUN SARVAN", "D051__\u018fHM\u018fDOV ELV\u0130N A\u011eAS\u018fM\u018fD": "D051__\u018fHM\u018fDOV ELV\u0130N A\u011eAS\u018fM\u018fD", "D051__\u018fS\u018fDOV HEYD\u018fR XANI\u015e": "D051__\u018fS\u018fDOV HEYD\u018fR XANI\u015e", "D052__C\u018fF\u018fROV R\u018fSUL A\u011eAH\u018fS\u018fN": "D052__C\u018fF\u018fROV R\u018fSUL A\u011eAH\u018fS\u018fN", "D052__HACIYEV HACI M\u018fHY\u018fDD\u0130N": "D052__HACIYEV HACI M\u018fHY\u018fDD\u0130N", "D052__HACIYEVA G\u00dcNAY ARZU": "D052__HACIYEVA G\u00dcNAY ARZU", "D052__M\u00c6\u008fH\u00c6\u008fRR\u00c6\u008fMOV H\u00dcSEYN S\u00dcLEYMAN": "D052__M\u00c6\u008fH\u00c6\u008fRR\u00c6\u008fMOV H\u00dcSEYN S\u00dcLEYMAN", "D052__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV \u0130LHAM KAZIM": "D052__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV \u0130LHAM KAZIM", "D052__QASIMOV N\u0130CAT ELXAN": "D052__QASIMOV N\u0130CAT ELXAN", "D052__YUS\u00c4\u00b0FL\u00c4\u00b0 \u00dcLV\u00c4\u00b0YY\u00c6\u008f SAQ\u00c4\u00b0": "D052__YUS\u00c4\u00b0FL\u00c4\u00b0 \u00dcLV\u00c4\u00b0YY\u00c6\u008f SAQ\u00c4\u00b0", "D053__B\u018fHR\u018fMZAD\u018f BAB\u018fK RAM\u0130Z": "D053__B\u018fHR\u018fMZAD\u018f BAB\u018fK RAM\u0130Z", "D053__H\u00c4\u00b0DAY\u00c6\u008fTOV AS\u00c4\u00b0F M\u00dcRS\u00c6\u008fL": "D053__H\u00c4\u00b0DAY\u00c6\u008fTOV AS\u00c4\u00b0F M\u00dcRS\u00c6\u008fL", "D053__H\u00dcSEYNL\u00c4\u00b0 \u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0 M\u00c6\u008fH\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fD": "D053__H\u00dcSEYNL\u00c4\u00b0 \u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0 M\u00c6\u008fH\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fD", "D053__H\u018fMZ\u018fYEV ELNUR \u015eAH\u0130N": "D053__H\u018fMZ\u018fYEV ELNUR \u015eAH\u0130N", "D053__ZAB\u0130TZAD\u018f K\u018fNAN YUS\u0130F": "D053__ZAB\u0130TZAD\u018f K\u018fNAN YUS\u0130F", "D053__\u0130SK\u018fND\u018fROV V\u018fFADAR TELMAN": "D053__\u0130SK\u018fND\u018fROV V\u018fFADAR TELMAN", "D053__\u018fL\u0130YEVA L\u018fMAN SAD\u0130Q": "D053__\u018fL\u0130YEVA L\u018fMAN SAD\u0130Q", "D054__A\u011eA QAL\u0130B \u015e\u018fMS\u018fDD\u0130N": "D054__A\u011eA QAL\u0130B \u015e\u018fMS\u018fDD\u0130N", "D054__H\u018fS\u018fNL\u0130 \u018fMRAH QO\u015eQAR": "D054__H\u018fS\u018fNL\u0130 \u018fMRAH QO\u015eQAR", "D054__M\u00c4\u00b0RZ\u00c6\u008fZAD\u00c6\u008f AYDIN B\u00d6Y\u00dcKK\u00c4\u00b0\u00c5\u009e\u00c4\u00b0": "D054__M\u00c4\u00b0RZ\u00c6\u008fZAD\u00c6\u008f AYDIN B\u00d6Y\u00dcKK\u00c4\u00b0\u00c5\u009e\u00c4\u00b0", "D054__M\u018fMM\u018fDL\u0130 YEGAN\u018f ZAK\u0130R": "D054__M\u018fMM\u018fDL\u0130 YEGAN\u018f ZAK\u0130R", "D054__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV S\u018fRVAN \u0130LHAM": "D054__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV S\u018fRVAN \u0130LHAM", "D054__S\u018fRK\u018fROV \u015e\u018fR\u018fF S\u018fM\u018fD": "D054__S\u018fRK\u018fROV \u015e\u018fR\u018fF S\u018fM\u018fD", "D054__\u018fL\u0130YEV \u018fL\u018fSG\u018fR Q\u018fHR\u018fMAN": "D054__\u018fL\u0130YEV \u018fL\u018fSG\u018fR Q\u018fHR\u018fMAN", "D054__\u018fYYUBOV TAC\u018fDD\u0130N \u0130BRAH\u0130M": "D054__\u018fYYUBOV TAC\u018fDD\u0130N \u0130BRAH\u0130M", "D055__BA\u011eIROV RAH\u0130B F\u0130RUDUN": "D055__BA\u011eIROV RAH\u0130B F\u0130RUDUN", "D055__M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDL\u00c4\u00b0 M\u00dc\u00c5\u009eF\u00c4\u00b0Q FAZ\u00c4\u00b0L": "D055__M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDL\u00c4\u00b0 M\u00dc\u00c5\u009eF\u00c4\u00b0Q FAZ\u00c4\u00b0L", "D055__N\u0130FT\u018fL\u0130YEVA XAL\u0130D\u018f RZA": "D055__N\u0130FT\u018fL\u0130YEVA XAL\u0130D\u018f RZA", "D055__TA\u011eIYEV TURAL EYYAM": "D055__TA\u011eIYEV TURAL EYYAM", "D055__TA\u011eIYEVA L\u018fMAN BAHADIR": "D055__TA\u011eIYEVA L\u018fMAN BAHADIR", "D055__\u015e\u018fK\u018fROV ANAR M\u018fMM\u018fDMUSA": "D055__\u015e\u018fK\u018fROV ANAR M\u018fMM\u018fDMUSA", "D056__BABAYEV SAH\u0130B \u0130MAM": "D056__BABAYEV SAH\u0130B \u0130MAM", "D056__CAVADOV ZEYNAL MURADXAN": "D056__CAVADOV ZEYNAL MURADXAN", "D056__H\u00c4\u00b0DAY\u00c6\u008fTZAD\u00c6\u008f R\u00dcST\u00c6\u008fM RAF\u00c4\u00b0Q": "D056__H\u00c4\u00b0DAY\u00c6\u008fTZAD\u00c6\u008f R\u00dcST\u00c6\u008fM RAF\u00c4\u00b0Q", "D056__SEY\u0130DL\u0130 F\u018fR\u0130D QAL\u0130B": "D056__SEY\u0130DL\u0130 F\u018fR\u0130D QAL\u0130B", "D056__S\u00dcLEYMANLI MAH\u00c4\u00b0R TAH\u00c4\u00b0R": "D056__S\u00dcLEYMANLI MAH\u00c4\u00b0R TAH\u00c4\u00b0R", "D056__T\u018fHM\u018fZOV MEHMAN K\u018fR\u0130M": "D056__T\u018fHM\u018fZOV MEHMAN K\u018fR\u0130M", "D056__\u018fL\u0130YEVA NURCAHAN \u018fL\u0130": "D056__\u018fL\u0130YEVA NURCAHAN \u018fL\u0130", "D057__C\u00c6\u008fF\u00c6\u008fROVA AYSEL \u00c6\u008fB\u00dcLF\u00c6\u008fZ": "D057__C\u00c6\u008fF\u00c6\u008fROVA AYSEL \u00c6\u008fB\u00dcLF\u00c6\u008fZ", "D057__M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDOV Z\u00d6HRAB SEY\u00c4\u00b0DA\u00c4\u009eA": "D057__M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDOV Z\u00d6HRAB SEY\u00c4\u00b0DA\u00c4\u009eA", "D057__N\u018fS\u0130ROVA \u015e\u018fBN\u018fM RAMAZAN": "D057__N\u018fS\u0130ROVA \u015e\u018fBN\u018fM RAMAZAN", "D057__QURBANOV M\u018fMM\u018fD \u018fL\u0130A\u011eA": "D057__QURBANOV M\u018fMM\u018fD \u018fL\u0130A\u011eA", "D057__SEY\u0130DOV SAM\u0130D SANAN": "D057__SEY\u0130DOV SAM\u0130D SANAN", "D057__V\u018fL\u0130YEV A\u011eALAR \u0130SR\u018fF\u0130L": "D057__V\u018fL\u0130YEV A\u011eALAR \u0130SR\u018fF\u0130L", "D057__\u018fL\u0130OSMANOV P\u018fRV\u0130Z HACBALA": "D057__\u018fL\u0130OSMANOV P\u018fRV\u0130Z HACBALA", "D057__\u018fM\u0130RCANOVA X\u018fYAL\u018f F\u0130KR\u018fT": "D057__\u018fM\u0130RCANOVA X\u018fYAL\u018f F\u0130KR\u018fT", "D058__A\u011eAYEV M\u0130RC\u018fL\u0130L M\u0130REYYUB": "D058__A\u011eAYEV M\u0130RC\u018fL\u0130L M\u0130REYYUB", "D058__HACIYEV EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N AK\u00c4\u00b0F": "D058__HACIYEV EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N AK\u00c4\u00b0F", "D058__M\u00c6\u008fH\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDYAROV \u00c5\u009e\u00d6HR\u00c6\u008fT S\u00c6\u008fF\u00c4\u00b0XAN": "D058__M\u00c6\u008fH\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDYAROV \u00c5\u009e\u00d6HR\u00c6\u008fT S\u00c6\u008fF\u00c4\u00b0XAN", "D058__M\u0130KAYILOVA SEV\u0130L \u018fL\u0130RAZI": "D058__M\u0130KAYILOVA SEV\u0130L \u018fL\u0130RAZI", "D058__\u00c5\u009eAHBAZ\u00c4\u00b0 \u00c7\u00c4\u00b0NG\u00c4\u00b0Z \u00c4\u00b0MR\u00c4\u00b0S": "D058__\u00c5\u009eAHBAZ\u00c4\u00b0 \u00c7\u00c4\u00b0NG\u00c4\u00b0Z \u00c4\u00b0MR\u00c4\u00b0S", "D058__\u00c6\u008fHM\u00c6\u008fDOVA G\u00dcLT\u00c6\u008fK\u00c4\u00b0N B\u00c4\u00b0N\u00c6\u008fT\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0": "D058__\u00c6\u008fHM\u00c6\u008fDOVA G\u00dcLT\u00c6\u008fK\u00c4\u00b0N B\u00c4\u00b0N\u00c6\u008fT\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0", "D058__\u00c6\u008fSK\u00c6\u008fROVA K\u00d6N\u00dcL R\u00c6\u008fC\u00c6\u008fB": "D058__\u00c6\u008fSK\u00c6\u008fROVA K\u00d6N\u00dcL R\u00c6\u008fC\u00c6\u008fB", "D058__\u0130SK\u018fND\u018fROV \u0130MRAN P\u0130R\u0130MAL\u0130": "D058__\u0130SK\u018fND\u018fROV \u0130MRAN P\u0130R\u0130MAL\u0130", "D059__ABAYEV YUS\u0130F Q\u018f\u015e\u018fM": "D059__ABAYEV YUS\u0130F Q\u018f\u015e\u018fM", "D059__ABDULLAYEVA AYNUR YUN\u0130S": "D059__ABDULLAYEVA AYNUR YUN\u0130S", "D059__B\u018fD\u018fLB\u018fYL\u0130 AYT\u018fN B\u018fD\u018fL": "D059__B\u018fD\u018fLB\u018fYL\u0130 AYT\u018fN B\u018fD\u018fL", "D059__M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fMOV \u018fLABBAS KAMRAN": "D059__M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fMOV \u018fLABBAS KAMRAN", "D059__M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fMZAD\u018f \u018fL\u0130BALA S\u018fTTAR": "D059__M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fMZAD\u018f \u018fL\u0130BALA S\u018fTTAR", "D059__N\u0130FT\u018fL\u0130YEV NA\u0130B \u018fMRULLA": "D059__N\u0130FT\u018fL\u0130YEV NA\u0130B \u018fMRULLA", "D059__S\u018fM\u018fDOV S\u018fBUH\u0130 S\u018fXAV\u018fT": "D059__S\u018fM\u018fDOV S\u018fBUH\u0130 S\u018fXAV\u018fT", "D059__S\u018fTTAROV F\u018fRHAD Q\u018fHR\u018fMAN": "D059__S\u018fTTAROV F\u018fRHAD Q\u018fHR\u018fMAN", "D059__\u018fL\u0130YEV F\u018fR\u0130D NAZ\u0130M": "D059__\u018fL\u0130YEV F\u018fR\u0130D NAZ\u0130M", "D059__\u018fL\u018fSG\u018fRL\u0130 ELM\u018fDD\u0130N C\u018fF\u018fR": "D059__\u018fL\u018fSG\u018fRL\u0130 ELM\u018fDD\u0130N C\u018fF\u018fR", "D060__ABASOVA N\u018fRM\u0130N KAMRAN": "D060__ABASOVA N\u018fRM\u0130N KAMRAN", "D060__ABDULLAYEV ELDAR B\u018fYL\u018fR": "D060__ABDULLAYEV ELDAR B\u018fYL\u018fR", "D060__BA\u011eIROVA F\u0130DAN YUS\u0130F\u018fL\u0130": "D060__BA\u011eIROVA F\u0130DAN YUS\u0130F\u018fL\u0130", "D060__H\u00dcSEYNOV AYAZ AZ\u00c6\u008fR": "D060__H\u00dcSEYNOV AYAZ AZ\u00c6\u008fR", "D060__RAFA\u00c4\u00b0LOV ANATOL\u00c4\u00b0Y XA\u00c4\u00b0MOV\u00c4\u00b0\u00c7": "D060__RAFA\u00c4\u00b0LOV ANATOL\u00c4\u00b0Y XA\u00c4\u00b0MOV\u00c4\u00b0\u00c7", "D060__\u0130SAYEV ZAH\u0130R Q\u018fZ\u018fNF\u018fR": "D060__\u0130SAYEV ZAH\u0130R Q\u018fZ\u018fNF\u018fR", "D060__\u018fSK\u018fROVA G\u0130LAN\u018f TELMAN": "D060__\u018fSK\u018fROVA G\u0130LAN\u018f TELMAN", "D061__ASLANOV R\u018f\u015eAD \u018fM\u0130RB\u018fY": "D061__ASLANOV R\u018f\u015eAD \u018fM\u0130RB\u018fY", "D061__BADAMOV AZ\u018fR CAMAL": "D061__BADAMOV AZ\u018fR CAMAL", "D061__K\u018fLB\u0130YEV AZAD \u015eIXK\u018fR\u0130M": "D061__K\u018fLB\u0130YEV AZAD \u015eIXK\u018fR\u0130M", "D061__M\u018fHS\u0130MOVA SEV\u0130NC ABUSALAT": "D061__M\u018fHS\u0130MOVA SEV\u0130NC ABUSALAT", "D061__OSMANOV NAZ\u0130M \u018fL\u0130SMAN": "D061__OSMANOV NAZ\u0130M \u018fL\u0130SMAN", "D061__POLADXANOVA G\u00dcLAN\u00c6\u008f M\u00c6\u008fZAH\u00c4\u00b0R": "D061__POLADXANOVA G\u00dcLAN\u00c6\u008f M\u00c6\u008fZAH\u00c4\u00b0R", "D061__\u015e\u0130XMURADOVA K\u0130FAY\u018fT \u018fSF\u018fND\u0130YAR": "D061__\u015e\u0130XMURADOVA K\u0130FAY\u018fT \u018fSF\u018fND\u0130YAR", "D062__A\u011eAZAD\u018f \u018fM\u0130N\u018f H\u018fM\u0130D": "D062__A\u011eAZAD\u018f \u018fM\u0130N\u018f H\u018fM\u0130D", "D062__C\u018fBRAYILOVA M\u018fHLUQ\u018f SALEH": "D062__C\u018fBRAYILOVA M\u018fHLUQ\u018f SALEH", "D062__H\u018fS\u018fNOV ANAR MAH\u0130R": "D062__H\u018fS\u018fNOV ANAR MAH\u0130R", "D062__H\u018fS\u018fNOV RAS\u0130M M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD": "D062__H\u018fS\u018fNOV RAS\u0130M M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD", "D062__KAZIMOVA YAD\u00c4\u00b0GAR T\u00c6\u008fV\u00c6\u008fKG\u00dcL": "D062__KAZIMOVA YAD\u00c4\u00b0GAR T\u00c6\u008fV\u00c6\u008fKG\u00dcL", "D062__K\u018fR\u0130ML\u0130 KAM\u0130L KAMAL": "D062__K\u018fR\u0130ML\u0130 KAM\u0130L KAMAL", "D062__MAHMUDOV A\u011eALAR \u018fHM\u018fDA\u011eA": "D062__MAHMUDOV A\u011eALAR \u018fHM\u018fDA\u011eA", "D063__ASLANOV AQ\u0130L RAH\u0130L": "D063__ASLANOV AQ\u0130L RAH\u0130L", "D063__CABAROVA SU\u00c4\u009eRA B\u00d6Y\u00dcKA\u00c4\u009eA": "D063__CABAROVA SU\u00c4\u009eRA B\u00d6Y\u00dcKA\u00c4\u009eA", "D063__H\u00dcSEYNOV RAFAEL BABA": "D063__H\u00dcSEYNOV RAFAEL BABA", "D063__MAYILOV \u0130LHAM AYAZ\u018fL\u0130": "D063__MAYILOV \u0130LHAM AYAZ\u018fL\u0130", "D063__QOCAYEV VAH\u0130D QULAM\u018fL\u0130": "D063__QOCAYEV VAH\u0130D QULAM\u018fL\u0130", "D063__TA\u011eIYEV ELNUR M\u018fTL\u018fB": "D063__TA\u011eIYEV ELNUR M\u018fTL\u018fB", "D063__\u00c5\u009e\u00dcK\u00dcRL\u00dc V\u00dcSAL\u00c6\u008f NAM\u00c4\u00b0K": "D063__\u00c5\u009e\u00dcK\u00dcRL\u00dc V\u00dcSAL\u00c6\u008f NAM\u00c4\u00b0K", "D064__C\u018fF\u018fROV EL\u015e\u018fN TEYMUR": "D064__C\u018fF\u018fROV EL\u015e\u018fN TEYMUR", "D064__K\u018fR\u0130MOVA X\u018fYAL\u018f AD\u0130L": "D064__K\u018fR\u0130MOVA X\u018fYAL\u018f AD\u0130L", "D064__M\u018fL\u0130KOV F\u0130KR\u018fT \u018fHM\u018fD": "D064__M\u018fL\u0130KOV F\u0130KR\u018fT \u018fHM\u018fD", "D064__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA AYSEL VAQ\u0130F": "D064__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA AYSEL VAQ\u0130F", "D064__QULUYEV P\u018fRV\u0130Z F\u018fXR\u018fDD\u0130N": "D064__QULUYEV P\u018fRV\u0130Z F\u018fXR\u018fDD\u0130N", "D064__QURBANOV SAD\u0130Q HAQVERD\u0130": "D064__QURBANOV SAD\u0130Q HAQVERD\u0130", "D064__QURBANOVA AYT\u018fN N\u0130ZAM\u0130": "D064__QURBANOVA AYT\u018fN N\u0130ZAM\u0130", "D064__SALAHOV \u0130QBAL VALEH": "D064__SALAHOV \u0130QBAL VALEH", "D064__V\u018fL\u0130YEV RAM\u0130L \u018fL\u018f\u015eR\u018fF": "D064__V\u018fL\u0130YEV RAM\u0130L \u018fL\u018f\u015eR\u018fF", "D065__A\u00c4\u009eAMALI G\u00dcNAY F\u00c6\u008fZA\u00c4\u00b0L": "D065__A\u00c4\u009eAMALI G\u00dcNAY F\u00c6\u008fZA\u00c4\u00b0L", "D065__A\u00c4\u009eAYEV EM\u00c4\u00b0N Z\u00dcLF\u00dcQAR": "D065__A\u00c4\u009eAYEV EM\u00c4\u00b0N Z\u00dcLF\u00dcQAR", "D065__A\u011eAYEV NAD\u0130R SALEH": "D065__A\u011eAYEV NAD\u0130R SALEH", "D065__BABAYEVA N\u0130GAR \u018fL\u0130ZAD\u018f": "D065__BABAYEVA N\u0130GAR \u018fL\u0130ZAD\u018f", "D065__CAVADOVA N\u018fRG\u0130Z CAHANG\u0130R": "D065__CAVADOVA N\u018fRG\u0130Z CAHANG\u0130R", "D065__DADA\u015eOV R\u018f\u015eAD RUF\u0130Q": "D065__DADA\u015eOV R\u018f\u015eAD RUF\u0130Q", "D065__H\u00dcSEYNOV Z\u00c6\u008fBULLA N\u00c4\u00b0ZAM\u00c4\u00b0": "D065__H\u00dcSEYNOV Z\u00c6\u008fBULLA N\u00c4\u00b0ZAM\u00c4\u00b0", "D065__RZAYEV M\u0130RABAS HACIA\u011eA": "D065__RZAYEV M\u0130RABAS HACIA\u011eA", "D065__RZAYEV QAL\u0130B D\u018fD\u018fM\u0130RZ\u018f": "D065__RZAYEV QAL\u0130B D\u018fD\u018fM\u0130RZ\u018f", "D065__R\u00dcST\u00c6\u008fMB\u00c6\u008fYL\u00c4\u00b0 NAH\u00c4\u00b0D CEYHUN": "D065__R\u00dcST\u00c6\u008fMB\u00c6\u008fYL\u00c4\u00b0 NAH\u00c4\u00b0D CEYHUN", "D066__H\u00c6\u008fM\u00c4\u00b0DOV \u00dcLV\u00c4\u00b0 C\u00c6\u008fMAL\u00c6\u008fDD\u00c4\u00b0N": "D066__H\u00c6\u008fM\u00c4\u00b0DOV \u00dcLV\u00c4\u00b0 C\u00c6\u008fMAL\u00c6\u008fDD\u00c4\u00b0N", "D066__QUL\u0130YEV AQ\u0130L \u018fL\u0130QULU": "D066__QUL\u0130YEV AQ\u0130L \u018fL\u0130QULU", "D066__QURBANLI ELXAN MA\u0130S": "D066__QURBANLI ELXAN MA\u0130S", "D066__SEY\u0130DOV ELM\u0130R AS\u0130F": "D066__SEY\u0130DOV ELM\u0130R AS\u0130F", "D066__S\u018fM\u018fDZAD\u018f MAH\u0130D\u018f S\u018fM\u018fD": "D066__S\u018fM\u018fDZAD\u018f MAH\u0130D\u018f S\u018fM\u018fD", "D066__\u0130BAYEV \u015eAMXAL M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD": "D066__\u0130BAYEV \u015eAMXAL M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD", "D066__\u018fL\u018fKB\u018fROV \u018fZ\u0130Z YUS\u0130F": "D066__\u018fL\u018fKB\u018fROV \u018fZ\u0130Z YUS\u0130F", "D067__A\u011eAYEVA R\u018fNA BALAQARDA\u015e": "D067__A\u011eAYEVA R\u018fNA BALAQARDA\u015e", "D067__BABAYEV \u018fZ\u0130ZA\u011eA OTARXAN": "D067__BABAYEV \u018fZ\u0130ZA\u011eA OTARXAN", "D067__G\u00d6Z\u00c6\u008fLOV XAQAN\u00c4\u00b0 RAF\u00c4\u00b0Q": "D067__G\u00d6Z\u00c6\u008fLOV XAQAN\u00c4\u00b0 RAF\u00c4\u00b0Q", "D067__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV TEYMUR NAZ\u0130M": "D067__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV TEYMUR NAZ\u0130M", "D067__SALMANOV FARMAN RAXMAN": "D067__SALMANOV FARMAN RAXMAN", "D067__SULTANLI V\u00dcSAL \u00c4\u00b0LQAR": "D067__SULTANLI V\u00dcSAL \u00c4\u00b0LQAR", "D067__Z\u018fRBAL\u0130YEVA LAM\u0130Y\u018f F\u0130KR\u018fT": "D067__Z\u018fRBAL\u0130YEVA LAM\u0130Y\u018f F\u0130KR\u018fT", "D067__\u018fH\u018fDOVA D\u0130L\u015eAD MEYXO\u015e": "D067__\u018fH\u018fDOVA D\u0130L\u015eAD MEYXO\u015e", "D067__\u018fM\u0130RASLANOV \u018fHL\u0130MAN TAPDIQ": "D067__\u018fM\u0130RASLANOV \u018fHL\u0130MAN TAPDIQ", "D068__BAYRAMOV ELNUR RAMAZAN": "D068__BAYRAMOV ELNUR RAMAZAN", "D068__C\u018fF\u018fROV KAMAL XAQAN\u0130": "D068__C\u018fF\u018fROV KAMAL XAQAN\u0130", "D068__H\u00dcSEYN P\u00c6\u008fNAH \u00c7ODAR": "D068__H\u00dcSEYN P\u00c6\u008fNAH \u00c7ODAR", "D068__H\u00dcSEYNOVA G\u00dcNAY \u00c6\u008fH\u00c6\u008fD": "D068__H\u00dcSEYNOVA G\u00dcNAY \u00c6\u008fH\u00c6\u008fD", "D068__H\u018fM\u0130DOV S\u018fB\u0130RXAN Q\u018fF\u0130L": "D068__H\u018fM\u0130DOV S\u018fB\u0130RXAN Q\u018fF\u0130L", "D068__\u018fKB\u018fROV \u015e\u0130RXAN \u0130N\u015eALLAH": "D068__\u018fKB\u018fROV \u015e\u0130RXAN \u0130N\u015eALLAH", "D068__\u018fL\u0130YEVA SEVDA M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD": "D068__\u018fL\u0130YEVA SEVDA M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD", "D069__MEHT\u0130 YUS\u0130F HACEY\u0130B": "D069__MEHT\u0130 YUS\u0130F HACEY\u0130B", "D069__M\u00dcRS\u00c6\u008fLOVA NUR\u00c4\u00b0D\u00c6\u008f SALEH": "D069__M\u00dcRS\u00c6\u008fLOVA NUR\u00c4\u00b0D\u00c6\u008f SALEH", "D069__M\u0130R\u0130ZAD\u018f P\u018fRV\u0130Z \u0130MAN": "D069__M\u0130R\u0130ZAD\u018f P\u018fRV\u0130Z \u0130MAN", "D069__M\u0130R\u018fL\u0130 NURLAN SAB\u0130R": "D069__M\u0130R\u018fL\u0130 NURLAN SAB\u0130R", "D069__M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fMOV B\u018fHRUZ ABDURR\u018fHMAN": "D069__M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fMOV B\u018fHRUZ ABDURR\u018fHMAN", "D069__Q\u018fR\u0130BOV RAH\u0130B M\u0130RZ\u018fK\u018fR\u0130M": "D069__Q\u018fR\u0130BOV RAH\u0130B M\u0130RZ\u018fK\u018fR\u0130M", "D069__\u018fDAL\u018fTL\u0130 EL\u015e\u018fN \u018fDAL\u018fT": "D069__\u018fDAL\u018fTL\u0130 EL\u015e\u018fN \u018fDAL\u018fT", "D069__\u018fL\u0130YEV ELM\u018fDD\u0130N SAM\u018fDD\u0130N": "D069__\u018fL\u0130YEV ELM\u018fDD\u0130N SAM\u018fDD\u0130N", "D070__A\u011eAL\u0130YEVA SEV\u0130NC TAPDIQ": "D070__A\u011eAL\u0130YEVA SEV\u0130NC TAPDIQ", "D070__BAXI\u015eOV F\u018fRHAD CEYHUN": "D070__BAXI\u015eOV F\u018fRHAD CEYHUN", "D070__H\u018fMZ\u018fYEV M\u0130RC\u018fLAL M\u0130RS\u018fM\u0130D": "D070__H\u018fMZ\u018fYEV M\u0130RC\u018fLAL M\u0130RS\u018fM\u0130D", "D070__K\u018fR\u0130MOV RAZ\u0130M \u018fYYUB": "D070__K\u018fR\u0130MOV RAZ\u0130M \u018fYYUB", "D070__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA SUSANA \u015e\u0130RZAD": "D070__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA SUSANA \u015e\u0130RZAD", "D070__NA\u011eIYEVA V\u018fFA CAMAL\u018fDD\u0130N": "D070__NA\u011eIYEVA V\u018fFA CAMAL\u018fDD\u0130N", "D070__R\u00dcST\u00c6\u008fMXANLI T\u00c6\u008fNZ\u00c4\u00b0L\u00c6\u008f YOL\u00c7U": "D070__R\u00dcST\u00c6\u008fMXANLI T\u00c6\u008fNZ\u00c4\u00b0L\u00c6\u008f YOL\u00c7U", "D070__TAH\u0130ROV Q\u018fHR\u018fMAN BALO\u011eLAN": "D070__TAH\u0130ROV Q\u018fHR\u018fMAN BALO\u011eLAN", "D070__\u0130MANZAD\u018f R\u018fNA DA\u015eQIN": "D070__\u0130MANZAD\u018f R\u018fNA DA\u015eQIN", "D070__\u018fL\u0130YEV QARA\u015e H\u018fS\u018fN": "D070__\u018fL\u0130YEV QARA\u015e H\u018fS\u018fN", "D071__H\u0130DAY\u018fTOV MAH\u0130R SUCAY\u018fT": "D071__H\u0130DAY\u018fTOV MAH\u0130R SUCAY\u018fT", "D071__H\u018fS\u018fNOV MAL\u0130K \u018fV\u018fZ": "D071__H\u018fS\u018fNOV MAL\u0130K \u018fV\u018fZ", "D071__M\u018fMM\u018fDZAD\u018f ANAR \u018fR\u018fSTUN": "D071__M\u018fMM\u018fDZAD\u018f ANAR \u018fR\u018fSTUN", "D071__QOCAZAD\u018f Z\u018fHRA \u018fL\u0130ZAM\u0130N": "D071__QOCAZAD\u018f Z\u018fHRA \u018fL\u0130ZAM\u0130N", "D071__\u00c6\u008fSG\u00c6\u008fROV AZ\u00c6\u008fR \u00c6\u008fB\u00dcLF\u00c6\u008fZ": "D071__\u00c6\u008fSG\u00c6\u008fROV AZ\u00c6\u008fR \u00c6\u008fB\u00dcLF\u00c6\u008fZ", "D071__\u018fZ\u0130MOV ASLAN \u0130SMAYIL": "D071__\u018fZ\u0130MOV ASLAN \u0130SMAYIL", "D071__\u018fZ\u0130ZXANLI \u018fZ\u0130ZXAN A\u011eAK\u018fR\u0130M": "D071__\u018fZ\u0130ZXANLI \u018fZ\u0130ZXAN A\u011eAK\u018fR\u0130M", "D072__AXUNDOV RAH\u0130M ADI\u015e": "D072__AXUNDOV RAH\u0130M ADI\u015e", "D072__BAYRAMOV C\u018fM\u015e\u0130D F\u018fR\u018fHM\u018fD": "D072__BAYRAMOV C\u018fM\u015e\u0130D F\u018fR\u018fHM\u018fD", "D072__H\u00dcSEYNOV ZAM\u00c4\u00b0Q AD\u00c4\u00b0L": "D072__H\u00dcSEYNOV ZAM\u00c4\u00b0Q AD\u00c4\u00b0L", "D072__NUR\u0130YEVA XURAMAN \u015eAK\u0130R": "D072__NUR\u0130YEVA XURAMAN \u015eAK\u0130R", "D072__N\u018fS\u0130ROV ELMAN XUDAM": "D072__N\u018fS\u0130ROV ELMAN XUDAM", "D072__QULUZAD\u018f NOVRUZ M\u0130S\u0130R": "D072__QULUZAD\u018f NOVRUZ M\u0130S\u0130R", "D072__\u0130BRAH\u0130MOVA H\u0130CRAN KAMRAN": "D072__\u0130BRAH\u0130MOVA H\u0130CRAN KAMRAN", "D073__BA\u011eI\u015eOV \u015eAMXAL \u0130MAM\u018fDD\u0130N": "D073__BA\u011eI\u015eOV \u015eAMXAL \u0130MAM\u018fDD\u0130N", "D073__H\u00dcSEYNOV MURAD \u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0": "D073__H\u00dcSEYNOV MURAD \u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0", "D073__H\u018fS\u018fNOV ELMAN H\u018fS\u018fN": "D073__H\u018fS\u018fNOV ELMAN H\u018fS\u018fN", "D073__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV KAMRAN HAK\u0130M": "D073__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV KAMRAN HAK\u0130M", "D073__NUR\u0130YEV DA\u015eQIN A\u011eARZA": "D073__NUR\u0130YEV DA\u015eQIN A\u011eARZA", "D073__N\u018fZ\u018fROVA LAL\u018f QAL\u0130B": "D073__N\u018fZ\u018fROVA LAL\u018f QAL\u0130B", "D073__\u0130BRAH\u0130ML\u0130 F\u018fZA\u0130L FEYRUZ": "D073__\u0130BRAH\u0130ML\u0130 F\u018fZA\u0130L FEYRUZ", "D073__\u018fL\u0130YEVA AYT\u018fN \u018fDAL\u018fT": "D073__\u018fL\u0130YEVA AYT\u018fN \u018fDAL\u018fT", "D073__\u018fL\u018fKB\u018fROV ZAUR ZAK\u0130R": "D073__\u018fL\u018fKB\u018fROV ZAUR ZAK\u0130R", "D073__\u018fM\u0130ROV \u015e\u018fMS\u018fDD\u0130N D\u018fH\u018fZXAN": "D073__\u018fM\u0130ROV \u015e\u018fMS\u018fDD\u0130N D\u018fH\u018fZXAN", "D074__A\u011eAYEVA AYSUM F\u0130RDOVS\u0130": "D074__A\u011eAYEVA AYSUM F\u0130RDOVS\u0130", "D074__H\u00dcSEYNOV EL\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN H\u00dcSEYN": "D074__H\u00dcSEYNOV EL\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN H\u00dcSEYN", "D074__M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDOVA NURAN\u00c6\u008f R\u00dcST\u00c6\u008fM": "D074__M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDOVA NURAN\u00c6\u008f R\u00dcST\u00c6\u008fM", "D074__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV M\u018f\u015eHUR \u015eAHBAZ": "D074__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV M\u018f\u015eHUR \u015eAHBAZ", "D074__N\u018fC\u018fFOV SEYRAN BURHAN": "D074__N\u018fC\u018fFOV SEYRAN BURHAN", "D074__XALIQZAD\u018f CAV\u0130DAN S\u0130YAS\u018fT": "D074__XALIQZAD\u018f CAV\u0130DAN S\u0130YAS\u018fT", "D074__\u018fZ\u0130MOV S\u018fFA SEVDAG\u018fR": "D074__\u018fZ\u0130MOV S\u018fFA SEVDAG\u018fR", "D075__BA\u00c4\u009eI\u00c5\u009eLI T\u00dcRKAN\u00c6\u008f F\u00c4\u00b0ZUL\u00c4\u00b0": "D075__BA\u00c4\u009eI\u00c5\u009eLI T\u00dcRKAN\u00c6\u008f F\u00c4\u00b0ZUL\u00c4\u00b0", "D075__DADA\u00c5\u009eOV V\u00dcQAR P\u00c4\u00b0R\u00c4\u00b0": "D075__DADA\u00c5\u009eOV V\u00dcQAR P\u00c4\u00b0R\u00c4\u00b0", "D075__M\u018fM\u0130\u015eOV EL\u015e\u018fN \u018fNV\u018fR": "D075__M\u018fM\u0130\u015eOV EL\u015e\u018fN \u018fNV\u018fR", "D075__N\u018fHM\u018fTOV \u0130QBAL H\u018fMZ\u018f": "D075__N\u018fHM\u018fTOV \u0130QBAL H\u018fMZ\u018f", "D075__QASIMLI MUSA C\u018fF\u018fR": "D075__QASIMLI MUSA C\u018fF\u018fR", "D075__\u018fL\u0130YEV S\u018fRV\u018fR M\u018fL\u0130KM\u018fMM\u018fD": "D075__\u018fL\u0130YEV S\u018fRV\u018fR M\u018fL\u0130KM\u018fMM\u018fD", "D075__\u018fS\u018fDL\u0130 SAM\u0130R \u015eAK\u0130R": "D075__\u018fS\u018fDL\u0130 SAM\u0130R \u015eAK\u0130R", "D076__HEYD\u00c6\u008fRL\u00c4\u00b0 YAL\u00c7IN Y\u00c6\u008fHYA": "D076__HEYD\u00c6\u008fRL\u00c4\u00b0 YAL\u00c7IN Y\u00c6\u008fHYA", "D076__KAZIMOV F\u018fR\u0130D ZAK\u0130R": "D076__KAZIMOV F\u018fR\u0130D ZAK\u0130R", "D076__M\u00c6\u008fM\u00c4\u00b0YEV R\u00d6V\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN M\u00c6\u008fM\u00c4\u00b0": "D076__M\u00c6\u008fM\u00c4\u00b0YEV R\u00d6V\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN M\u00c6\u008fM\u00c4\u00b0", "D076__N\u018fHM\u018fTOVA NAT\u0130Q\u018f XANLAR": "D076__N\u018fHM\u018fTOVA NAT\u0130Q\u018f XANLAR", "D076__PA\u00c5\u009eAZAD\u00c6\u008f CAVAN\u00c5\u009e\u00c4\u00b0R H\u00dcMM\u00c6\u008fT": "D076__PA\u00c5\u009eAZAD\u00c6\u008f CAVAN\u00c5\u009e\u00c4\u00b0R H\u00dcMM\u00c6\u008fT", "D076__\u018fS\u018fDOV MURAD \u018fYYAR": "D076__\u018fS\u018fDOV MURAD \u018fYYAR", "D077__ABBASOVA SEVAN\u018f RAS\u0130F": "D077__ABBASOVA SEVAN\u018f RAS\u0130F", "D077__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV FUAD F\u0130RDOVS\u0130": "D077__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV FUAD F\u0130RDOVS\u0130", "D077__Q\u018fHR\u018fMANZAD\u018f ORXAN ELXAN": "D077__Q\u018fHR\u018fMANZAD\u018f ORXAN ELXAN", "D077__R\u018fH\u0130ML\u0130 F\u018fR\u0130D\u018f RAF\u0130Q": "D077__R\u018fH\u0130ML\u0130 F\u018fR\u0130D\u018f RAF\u0130Q", "D077__\u0130SMAYILZAD\u018f FAR\u0130Z AK\u0130F": "D077__\u0130SMAYILZAD\u018f FAR\u0130Z AK\u0130F", "D077__\u018fL\u0130YEV M\u018fMM\u018fD A\u011eALAR": "D077__\u018fL\u0130YEV M\u018fMM\u018fD A\u011eALAR", "D077__\u018fL\u0130YEV \u018fL\u0130M\u018fRDAN \u018fL\u018fKB\u018fR": "D077__\u018fL\u0130YEV \u018fL\u0130M\u018fRDAN \u018fL\u018fKB\u018fR", "D078__KAZIMLI TURAL MAY\u0130S": "D078__KAZIMLI TURAL MAY\u0130S", "D078__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV N\u018fSRULLA NA\u0130B": "D078__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV N\u018fSRULLA NA\u0130B", "D078__QULUZAD\u018f TURAL S\u018fXAV\u018fT": "D078__QULUZAD\u018f TURAL S\u018fXAV\u018fT", "D078__R\u018fH\u0130MZAD\u018f XO\u015eB\u018fXT ZAH\u0130D": "D078__R\u018fH\u0130MZAD\u018f XO\u015eB\u018fXT ZAH\u0130D", "D078__S\u00c6\u008fF\u00c6\u008fROV EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N A\u00c4\u009eAH\u00c6\u008fS\u00c6\u008fN": "D078__S\u00c6\u008fF\u00c6\u008fROV EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N A\u00c4\u009eAH\u00c6\u008fS\u00c6\u008fN", "D078__\u0130SG\u018fND\u018fROV ANAR CAMAL": "D078__\u0130SG\u018fND\u018fROV ANAR CAMAL", "D078__\u018fZ\u0130ZOV \u018fZ\u0130ZXAN \u0130MAN": "D078__\u018fZ\u0130ZOV \u018fZ\u0130ZXAN \u0130MAN", "D079__H\u0130DAY\u018fTOV TURAL M\u0130RZA\u011eA": "D079__H\u0130DAY\u018fTOV TURAL M\u0130RZA\u011eA", "D079__H\u018fK\u0130MOV F\u018fZA\u0130L XANO\u011eLAN": "D079__H\u018fK\u0130MOV F\u018fZA\u0130L XANO\u011eLAN", "D079__MAHMUDOV R\u018f\u015eAD M\u018fMM\u018fDQULU": "D079__MAHMUDOV R\u018f\u015eAD M\u018fMM\u018fDQULU", "D079__RAHMANOV \u00c7\u00c4\u00b0NG\u00c4\u00b0Z M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fD": "D079__RAHMANOV \u00c7\u00c4\u00b0NG\u00c4\u00b0Z M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fD", "D079__YUNUSZAD\u018f YUNUS VAS\u0130F": "D079__YUNUSZAD\u018f YUNUS VAS\u0130F", "D079__\u018fHM\u018fDOVA VALENT\u0130NA M\u0130XAYLOVNA": "D079__\u018fHM\u018fDOVA VALENT\u0130NA M\u0130XAYLOVNA", "D080__A\u00c4\u009eAG\u00dcLOV MEHT\u00c4\u00b0 M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDA\u00c4\u009eA": "D080__A\u00c4\u009eAG\u00dcLOV MEHT\u00c4\u00b0 M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDA\u00c4\u009eA", "D080__HACIYEV NUR\u00c6\u008fDD\u00c4\u00b0N H\u00d6CC\u00c6\u008fT": "D080__HACIYEV NUR\u00c6\u008fDD\u00c4\u00b0N H\u00d6CC\u00c6\u008fT", "D080__H\u00dcSEYNOV TAH\u00c4\u00b0R \u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0": "D080__H\u00dcSEYNOV TAH\u00c4\u00b0R \u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0", "D080__M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDOV CAV\u00c4\u00b0D R\u00d6V\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN": "D080__M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDOV CAV\u00c4\u00b0D R\u00d6V\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN", "D080__M\u0130RZ\u018fZAD\u018f AYDAN AR\u0130F": "D080__M\u0130RZ\u018fZAD\u018f AYDAN AR\u0130F", "D080__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV \u015eAHLAR AK\u0130F": "D080__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV \u015eAHLAR AK\u0130F", "D080__PA\u015eAYEVA MEHR\u0130BAN \u018fL\u0130": "D080__PA\u015eAYEVA MEHR\u0130BAN \u018fL\u0130", "D080__QAFAROV VAS\u0130F VAQ\u0130F": "D080__QAFAROV VAS\u0130F VAQ\u0130F", "D080__R\u018fC\u018fBOV ELMAN \u018fL\u0130HEYD\u018fR": "D080__R\u018fC\u018fBOV ELMAN \u018fL\u0130HEYD\u018fR", "D080__Y\u018fHYAYEV T\u018fYYAR KAZIM": "D080__Y\u018fHYAYEV T\u018fYYAR KAZIM", "D081__MURADOV SAK\u0130T \u015e\u0130R\u0130N": "D081__MURADOV SAK\u0130T \u015e\u0130R\u0130N", "D081__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV ELNUR M\u018fN\u018fF": "D081__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV ELNUR M\u018fN\u018fF", "D081__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV \u0130SRAF\u0130L ZAK\u0130R": "D081__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV \u0130SRAF\u0130L ZAK\u0130R", "D081__NA\u011eIZAD\u018f AD\u0130L M\u018fD\u018fT": "D081__NA\u011eIZAD\u018f AD\u0130L M\u018fD\u018fT", "D081__NURULLAYEV RAZ\u0130 QULAM\u018fL\u0130": "D081__NURULLAYEV RAZ\u0130 QULAM\u018fL\u0130", "D081__QARAYEVA G\u00dcNEL CAB\u00c4\u00b0R": "D081__QARAYEVA G\u00dcNEL CAB\u00c4\u00b0R", "D081__SADIQOVA V\u00dcSAL\u00c6\u008f Q\u00c6\u008fL\u00c6\u008fND\u00c6\u008fR": "D081__SADIQOVA V\u00dcSAL\u00c6\u008f Q\u00c6\u008fL\u00c6\u008fND\u00c6\u008fR", "D082__H\u018fS\u018fNOV TAPDIQ H\u018fS\u018fN": "D082__H\u018fS\u018fNOV TAPDIQ H\u018fS\u018fN", "D082__MEHT\u00c4\u00b0YEV EHT\u00c4\u00b0RAM T\u00c6\u008fV\u00c6\u008fKK\u00dcL": "D082__MEHT\u00c4\u00b0YEV EHT\u00c4\u00b0RAM T\u00c6\u008fV\u00c6\u008fKK\u00dcL", "D082__M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fML\u0130 R\u018f\u015e\u0130D A\u011eAM\u0130RZ\u018f": "D082__M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fML\u0130 R\u018f\u015e\u0130D A\u011eAM\u0130RZ\u018f", "D082__N\u018fC\u018fFQUL\u0130YEVA LEYLA R\u018fH\u0130M": "D082__N\u018fC\u018fFQUL\u0130YEVA LEYLA R\u018fH\u0130M", "D082__Q\u00c6\u008fYYUMOVA YAS\u00c6\u008fM\u00c6\u008fN M\u00dcSL\u00dcM": "D082__Q\u00c6\u008fYYUMOVA YAS\u00c6\u008fM\u00c6\u008fN M\u00dcSL\u00dcM", "D082__R\u018fHMANOVA S\u018fMAY\u018f CAMAL": "D082__R\u018fHMANOVA S\u018fMAY\u018f CAMAL", "D082__SADIQOV ELM\u0130N L\u018fNK\u018fRAN": "D082__SADIQOV ELM\u0130N L\u018fNK\u018fRAN", "D082__SALAHLI S\u018fYYAD AD\u0130L": "D082__SALAHLI S\u018fYYAD AD\u0130L", "D082__\u00c5\u009e\u00dcK\u00dcROV AZ\u00c6\u008fR \u00c6\u008fJD\u00c6\u008fR": "D082__\u00c5\u009e\u00dcK\u00dcROV AZ\u00c6\u008fR \u00c6\u008fJD\u00c6\u008fR", "D083__A\u00c4\u009eAYEVA Z\u00dcLEYXA N\u00dcSR\u00c6\u008fT": "D083__A\u00c4\u009eAYEVA Z\u00dcLEYXA N\u00dcSR\u00c6\u008fT", "D083__K\u018fR\u0130MOV \u018fHM\u018fD M\u018fMM\u018fD\u018fL\u0130": "D083__K\u018fR\u0130MOV \u018fHM\u018fD M\u018fMM\u018fD\u018fL\u0130", "D083__MAHMUDLU S\u018fNAN NAD\u0130R": "D083__MAHMUDLU S\u018fNAN NAD\u0130R", "D083__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV SAD\u0130Q KAMAL\u018fDD\u0130N": "D083__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV SAD\u0130Q KAMAL\u018fDD\u0130N", "D083__NAMAZOV VALEH ALLAHVERD\u0130": "D083__NAMAZOV VALEH ALLAHVERD\u0130", "D083__\u0130SMAYILOV \u015eAH\u0130N \u018fM\u0130R": "D083__\u0130SMAYILOV \u015eAH\u0130N \u018fM\u0130R", "D084__BAYRAMOV V\u00dcQAR \u00c4\u00b0BAD": "D084__BAYRAMOV V\u00dcQAR \u00c4\u00b0BAD", "D084__MAHMUDSOY-D\u00c4\u00b0N\u00c7ER SULTAN B\u00c6\u008fXT\u00c4\u00b0YAR": "D084__MAHMUDSOY-D\u00c4\u00b0N\u00c7ER SULTAN B\u00c6\u008fXT\u00c4\u00b0YAR", "D084__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV NAM\u0130Q \u0130BRAH\u0130M": "D084__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV NAM\u0130Q \u0130BRAH\u0130M", "D084__M\u018fST\u018fL\u0130YEV R\u018fH\u0130M M\u018fST\u018fL\u0130": "D084__M\u018fST\u018fL\u0130YEV R\u018fH\u0130M M\u018fST\u018fL\u0130", "D084__SADIQLI M\u00dcBAR\u00c4\u00b0Z ORUC": "D084__SADIQLI M\u00dcBAR\u00c4\u00b0Z ORUC", "D084__\u00c4\u00b0MANZAD\u00c6\u008f G\u00dcNAY F\u00c4\u00b0KR\u00c6\u008fT": "D084__\u00c4\u00b0MANZAD\u00c6\u008f G\u00dcNAY F\u00c4\u00b0KR\u00c6\u008fT", "D084__\u00c6\u008fHM\u00c6\u008fDOVA G\u00dcL\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN T\u00c6\u008fL\u00c6\u008fT": "D084__\u00c6\u008fHM\u00c6\u008fDOVA G\u00dcL\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN T\u00c6\u008fL\u00c6\u008fT", "D084__\u0130SAYEV ANAR RAF\u0130Q": "D084__\u0130SAYEV ANAR RAF\u0130Q", "D085__ABBASOV AQ\u0130L M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD": "D085__ABBASOV AQ\u0130L M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD", "D085__C\u018fF\u018fROV D\u018fYAN\u018fT C\u018fM\u0130L": "D085__C\u018fF\u018fROV D\u018fYAN\u018fT C\u018fM\u0130L", "D085__HACIYEVA \u00c5\u009e\u00dcKUF\u00c6\u008f \u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fMS\u00c6\u008fDD\u00c4\u00b0N": "D085__HACIYEVA \u00c5\u009e\u00dcKUF\u00c6\u008f \u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fMS\u00c6\u008fDD\u00c4\u00b0N", "D085__H\u00dcSEYNOV ANAR VAQ\u00c4\u00b0F": "D085__H\u00dcSEYNOV ANAR VAQ\u00c4\u00b0F", "D085__H\u00dcSEYNOV F\u00c6\u008fQAN \u00c6\u008fR\u00c5\u009eAD": "D085__H\u00dcSEYNOV F\u00c6\u008fQAN \u00c6\u008fR\u00c5\u009eAD", "D085__MEHT\u0130YEV \u015eAHMAR \u018f\u015eR\u018fF": "D085__MEHT\u0130YEV \u015eAHMAR \u018f\u015eR\u018fF", "D085__QASIMOV ANAR HAB\u0130L": "D085__QASIMOV ANAR HAB\u0130L", "D085__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0YEV ANAR M\u00d6HT\u00c6\u008fR\u00c6\u008fM": "D085__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0YEV ANAR M\u00d6HT\u00c6\u008fR\u00c6\u008fM", "D086__ABDULLAYEVA MAYA A\u011eAM\u0130RZ\u018f": "D086__ABDULLAYEVA MAYA A\u011eAM\u0130RZ\u018f", "D086__BALAK\u00c4\u00b0\u00c5\u009e\u00c4\u00b0YEVA T\u00dcRKAN\u00c6\u008f MAH\u00c4\u00b0R": "D086__BALAK\u00c4\u00b0\u00c5\u009e\u00c4\u00b0YEVA T\u00dcRKAN\u00c6\u008f MAH\u00c4\u00b0R", "D086__HACIB\u018fYL\u0130 CAV\u0130D \u0130BRAH\u0130M": "D086__HACIB\u018fYL\u0130 CAV\u0130D \u0130BRAH\u0130M", "D086__M\u0130RZ\u018fYEV CAV\u0130D AYDIN": "D086__M\u0130RZ\u018fYEV CAV\u0130D AYDIN", "D086__QUL\u0130YEV A\u011eAXAN AZ\u018fR": "D086__QUL\u0130YEV A\u011eAXAN AZ\u018fR", "D086__RZAYEV TAH\u0130R MUSA": "D086__RZAYEV TAH\u0130R MUSA", "D086__\u018fKB\u018fROV \u0130SG\u018fND\u018fR \u018fL\u0130": "D086__\u018fKB\u018fROV \u0130SG\u018fND\u018fR \u018fL\u0130", "D087__H\u00dcSEYNOV P\u00c4\u00b0RVERD\u00c4\u00b0 H\u00dcSEY\u00c4\u00b0NA\u00c4\u009eA": "D087__H\u00dcSEYNOV P\u00c4\u00b0RVERD\u00c4\u00b0 H\u00dcSEY\u00c4\u00b0NA\u00c4\u009eA", "D087__NOVRUZOV RAS\u0130M RAM\u0130S": "D087__NOVRUZOV RAS\u0130M RAM\u0130S", "D087__R\u00dcST\u00c6\u008fMOV P\u00c6\u008fRV\u00c4\u00b0Z HACI": "D087__R\u00dcST\u00c6\u008fMOV P\u00c6\u008fRV\u00c4\u00b0Z HACI", "D087__SEY\u0130DZAD\u018f \u015eAH\u0130N KAM\u0130L": "D087__SEY\u0130DZAD\u018f \u015eAH\u0130N KAM\u0130L", "D087__YAQUBOVA S\u018fB\u0130N\u018f OQTAY": "D087__YAQUBOVA S\u018fB\u0130N\u018f OQTAY", "D087__\u0130BRAH\u0130M S\u018fF\u018fR BABA\u015e": "D087__\u0130BRAH\u0130M S\u018fF\u018fR BABA\u015e", "D087__\u015eIXM\u018fMM\u018fDOV \u018fFRAYIL R\u018fFAYIL": "D087__\u015eIXM\u018fMM\u018fDOV \u018fFRAYIL R\u018fFAYIL", "D088__C\u018fF\u018fROVA TAMAM \u015eAM\u018fMM\u018fD": "D088__C\u018fF\u018fROVA TAMAM \u015eAM\u018fMM\u018fD", "D088__QURBANOV RAUF \u018fFQAN": "D088__QURBANOV RAUF \u018fFQAN", "D088__S\u00c6\u008fRDARLI \u00c5\u009eAH\u00c4\u00b0N R\u00d6V\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN": "D088__S\u00c6\u008fRDARLI \u00c5\u009eAH\u00c4\u00b0N R\u00d6V\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN", "D088__TA\u011eIZAD\u018f R\u018fFA\u0130L VAH\u0130D": "D088__TA\u011eIZAD\u018f R\u018fFA\u0130L VAH\u0130D", "D088__ZEYNALOV \u0130NT\u0130QAM XANLAR": "D088__ZEYNALOV \u0130NT\u0130QAM XANLAR", "D088__\u015eIX\u018fL\u0130YEVA P\u018fRVAN\u018f \u018fHM\u018fD": "D088__\u015eIX\u018fL\u0130YEVA P\u018fRVAN\u018f \u018fHM\u018fD", "D088__\u018fL\u018fKB\u018fROVA AL\u0130Y\u018f M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD\u0130SMAYIL": "D088__\u018fL\u018fKB\u018fROVA AL\u0130Y\u018f M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD\u0130SMAYIL", "D089__ALLAHVERD\u0130YEVA XAV\u018fR \u015eAHI": "D089__ALLAHVERD\u0130YEVA XAV\u018fR \u015eAHI", "D089__ASLANOV NOVRUZ\u018fL\u0130 DAVUD": "D089__ASLANOV NOVRUZ\u018fL\u0130 DAVUD", "D089__BA\u011eIRLI R\u018fH\u0130M CAH\u0130D": "D089__BA\u011eIRLI R\u018fH\u0130M CAH\u0130D", "D089__DADA\u00c5\u009eOV N\u00c4\u00b0YAZ\u00c4\u00b0 S\u00dcLEYMAN": "D089__DADA\u00c5\u009eOV N\u00c4\u00b0YAZ\u00c4\u00b0 S\u00dcLEYMAN", "D089__H\u018fMZ\u018fYEV \u015eAK\u0130R A\u011eAS\u018fF": "D089__H\u018fMZ\u018fYEV \u015eAK\u0130R A\u011eAS\u018fF", "D089__H\u018fS\u018fNOVA \u0130LHAM\u018f SEYF\u018fL\u0130": "D089__H\u018fS\u018fNOVA \u0130LHAM\u018f SEYF\u018fL\u0130", "D089__\u018fL\u018fSG\u018fROV S\u018fYAH\u018fT QURBANALI": "D089__\u018fL\u018fSG\u018fROV S\u018fYAH\u018fT QURBANALI", "D090__B\u00c6\u008fD\u00c6\u008fLOV ZAB\u00c4\u00b0T M\u00dcBAR\u00c4\u00b0Z": "D090__B\u00c6\u008fD\u00c6\u008fLOV ZAB\u00c4\u00b0T M\u00dcBAR\u00c4\u00b0Z", "D090__H\u00dcSEYNOV \u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0 ABBAS": "D090__H\u00dcSEYNOV \u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0 ABBAS", "D090__K\u018fR\u0130MOV K\u018fNAN F\u018fXR\u018fDD\u0130N": "D090__K\u018fR\u0130MOV K\u018fNAN F\u018fXR\u018fDD\u0130N", "D090__M\u00c4\u00b0RZ\u00c6\u008fB\u00c6\u008fYL\u00c4\u00b0 EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N \u00c6\u008fBD\u00dcLR\u00c6\u008fH\u00c4\u00b0M": "D090__M\u00c4\u00b0RZ\u00c6\u008fB\u00c6\u008fYL\u00c4\u00b0 EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N \u00c6\u008fBD\u00dcLR\u00c6\u008fH\u00c4\u00b0M", "D090__N\u018fC\u018fFOV RUSLAN \u0130LYAS": "D090__N\u018fC\u018fFOV RUSLAN \u0130LYAS", "D090__SEY\u0130DZAD\u018f ZAH\u0130D A\u011eA\u0130RZA": "D090__SEY\u0130DZAD\u018f ZAH\u0130D A\u011eA\u0130RZA", "D090__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0YEVA AL\u00c6\u008fMZ\u00c6\u008fR M\u00dcT\u00c6\u008fLL\u00c4\u00b0M": "D090__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0YEVA AL\u00c6\u008fMZ\u00c6\u008fR M\u00dcT\u00c6\u008fLL\u00c4\u00b0M", "D090__\u018fL\u0130YEV EL\u015e\u018fN AL\u0130K": "D090__\u018fL\u0130YEV EL\u015e\u018fN AL\u0130K", "D091__BABAYEVA AYSU SEYYAD": "D091__BABAYEVA AYSU SEYYAD", "D091__HACIYEV ELXAN R\u00d6V\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN": "D091__HACIYEV ELXAN R\u00d6V\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN", "D091__HACIYEV SAB\u0130R KAMAL": "D091__HACIYEV SAB\u0130R KAMAL", "D091__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV C\u018fLAL ZAUR": "D091__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV C\u018fLAL ZAUR", "D091__Q\u018fD\u0130ROV K\u018fNAN HAB\u0130L": "D091__Q\u018fD\u0130ROV K\u018fNAN HAB\u0130L", "D091__R\u018fSULOV YUS\u0130F B\u018fHRAM": "D091__R\u018fSULOV YUS\u0130F B\u018fHRAM", "D091__\u018fKB\u018fROV F\u018fR\u0130D \u018fKB\u018fR": "D091__\u018fKB\u018fROV F\u018fR\u0130D \u018fKB\u018fR", "D092__BABAYEVA M\u018fHLUQ\u018f NAT\u0130Q": "D092__BABAYEVA M\u018fHLUQ\u018f NAT\u0130Q", "D092__KAZIMOV M\u0130RCAV\u0130D F\u018fDA": "D092__KAZIMOV M\u0130RCAV\u0130D F\u018fDA", "D092__K\u018fR\u0130MOV AK\u0130F M\u018fMM\u018fD": "D092__K\u018fR\u0130MOV AK\u0130F M\u018fMM\u018fD", "D092__M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDH\u00dcSEYNOV S\u00dcLEYMAN QOCA": "D092__M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDH\u00dcSEYNOV S\u00dcLEYMAN QOCA", "D092__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV CAMAL\u018fDD\u0130N CAMAL\u018fDD\u0130N": "D092__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV CAMAL\u018fDD\u0130N CAMAL\u018fDD\u0130N", "D092__M\u018fMM\u018fDYAROVA F\u0130R\u018fNG\u0130Z RAF\u0130Q": "D092__M\u018fMM\u018fDYAROVA F\u0130R\u018fNG\u0130Z RAF\u0130Q", "D092__QUL\u00c4\u00b0YEV V\u00dcSAL BALACAN": "D092__QUL\u00c4\u00b0YEV V\u00dcSAL BALACAN", "D092__\u018fF\u018fND\u0130YEV M\u018fZAH\u0130R CAV\u0130D": "D092__\u018fF\u018fND\u0130YEV M\u018fZAH\u0130R CAV\u0130D", "D093__ALIYEV SAH\u0130B EYVAZ": "D093__ALIYEV SAH\u0130B EYVAZ", "D093__EM\u0130NOVA JAL\u018f A\u011eAK\u0130\u015e\u0130": "D093__EM\u0130NOVA JAL\u018f A\u011eAK\u0130\u015e\u0130", "D093__G\u00d6Z\u00c6\u008fLOV ELM\u00c4\u00b0R \u00c5\u009eAHS\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0M": "D093__G\u00d6Z\u00c6\u008fLOV ELM\u00c4\u00b0R \u00c5\u009eAHS\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0M", "D093__QAFAROVA ELM\u0130RA NAH\u0130D": "D093__QAFAROVA ELM\u0130RA NAH\u0130D", "D093__QARAYEV QAL\u0130B ASLAN": "D093__QARAYEV QAL\u0130B ASLAN", "D093__\u015eAHMURADOV ANAR RAQ\u0130F": "D093__\u015eAHMURADOV ANAR RAQ\u0130F", "D093__\u015e\u0130R\u0130NOV HACIA\u011eA M\u0130RSAH\u0130B": "D093__\u015e\u0130R\u0130NOV HACIA\u011eA M\u0130RSAH\u0130B", "D094__H\u00dcSEYNOVA G\u00dcLNAR FA\u00c4\u00b0Q": "D094__H\u00dcSEYNOVA G\u00dcLNAR FA\u00c4\u00b0Q", "D094__H\u018fS\u018fN RAM\u0130L SAH\u0130B": "D094__H\u018fS\u018fN RAM\u0130L SAH\u0130B", "D094__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA \u015e\u018fLAL\u018f ABDUL\u018fZ\u0130Z": "D094__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA \u015e\u018fLAL\u018f ABDUL\u018fZ\u0130Z", "D094__TA\u011eIYEV A\u011eAR\u018fH\u0130M N\u018fR\u0130MAN": "D094__TA\u011eIYEV A\u011eAR\u018fH\u0130M N\u018fR\u0130MAN", "D094__\u00c7\u00c6\u008fRK\u00c6\u008fZOV VAQ\u00c4\u00b0F F\u00c4\u00b0RUD\u00c4\u00b0N": "D094__\u00c7\u00c6\u008fRK\u00c6\u008fZOV VAQ\u00c4\u00b0F F\u00c4\u00b0RUD\u00c4\u00b0N", "D094__\u0130SMAYIL ZAK\u0130R A\u011eA\u018fL\u0130": "D094__\u0130SMAYIL ZAK\u0130R A\u011eA\u018fL\u0130", "D094__\u018fZ\u0130ZOVA AF\u018fT M\u018fMM\u018fD": "D094__\u018fZ\u0130ZOVA AF\u018fT M\u018fMM\u018fD", "D095__K\u018fR\u0130MOVA ARZU ZAH\u0130R": "D095__K\u018fR\u0130MOVA ARZU ZAH\u0130R", "D095__M\u018fMM\u018fDL\u0130 M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD NUR\u018fDD\u0130N": "D095__M\u018fMM\u018fDL\u0130 M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD NUR\u018fDD\u0130N", "D095__N\u00c6\u008fR\u00c4\u00b0MANLI Z\u00dcMR\u00dcD NAZ\u00c4\u00b0M": "D095__N\u00c6\u008fR\u00c4\u00b0MANLI Z\u00dcMR\u00dcD NAZ\u00c4\u00b0M", "D095__S\u00dcLEYMANLI P\u00dcNHAN M\u00c6\u008fC\u00c4\u00b0D": "D095__S\u00dcLEYMANLI P\u00dcNHAN M\u00c6\u008fC\u00c4\u00b0D", "D095__TAPDIQOV HAQVERD\u00c4\u00b0 H\u00dcSEYN": "D095__TAPDIQOV HAQVERD\u00c4\u00b0 H\u00dcSEYN", "D095__\u0130SMAYILOVA S\u018fL\u0130Q\u018f ORUC": "D095__\u0130SMAYILOVA S\u018fL\u0130Q\u018f ORUC", "D095__\u018fL\u0130YEVA JAL\u018f FAZ\u0130L": "D095__\u018fL\u0130YEVA JAL\u018f FAZ\u0130L", "D096__B\u018fD\u018fLOV B\u018fD\u018fL \u015eAM\u0130L": "D096__B\u018fD\u018fLOV B\u018fD\u018fL \u015eAM\u0130L", "D096__H\u018fZQULUYEV \u018fL\u0130 S\u018fV\u0130ND\u0130K": "D096__H\u018fZQULUYEV \u018fL\u0130 S\u018fV\u0130ND\u0130K", "D096__M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDOVA X\u00c6\u008fYAL\u00c6\u008f H\u00dcSEYN": "D096__M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDOVA X\u00c6\u008fYAL\u00c6\u008f H\u00dcSEYN", "D096__N\u018fC\u018fFOV AYDIN MURAD": "D096__N\u018fC\u018fFOV AYDIN MURAD", "D096__VERD\u0130YEV \u0130MAMVERD\u0130 S\u018fM\u018fD": "D096__VERD\u0130YEV \u0130MAMVERD\u0130 S\u018fM\u018fD", "D096__XXX YUS\u0130F NAMAZ": "D096__XXX YUS\u0130F NAMAZ", "D096__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0ZAD\u00c6\u008f \u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fHLA R\u00dcST\u00c6\u008fM": "D096__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0ZAD\u00c6\u008f \u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fHLA R\u00dcST\u00c6\u008fM", "D096__\u015e\u0130R\u0130NOV RAM\u0130N MAAR\u0130F": "D096__\u015e\u0130R\u0130NOV RAM\u0130N MAAR\u0130F", "D097__H\u018fS\u018fNOV TAPDIQ Z\u018fRB\u018fL\u0130": "D097__H\u018fS\u018fNOV TAPDIQ Z\u018fRB\u018fL\u0130", "D097__MUXTARLI Q\u018fL\u018fND\u018fR \u015e\u018fM\u0130L": "D097__MUXTARLI Q\u018fL\u018fND\u018fR \u015e\u018fM\u0130L", "D097__M\u018fC\u0130D ZAD\u018f \u015e\u018fHR\u0130YAR S\u018fRDAR": "D097__M\u018fC\u0130D ZAD\u018f \u015e\u018fHR\u0130YAR S\u018fRDAR", "D097__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV ANAR \u0130LYAZ": "D097__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV ANAR \u0130LYAZ", "D097__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0ZAD\u00c6\u008f G\u00dcL\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN AQ\u00c4\u00b0L": "D097__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0ZAD\u00c6\u008f G\u00dcL\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN AQ\u00c4\u00b0L", "D097__\u018fZ\u0130ML\u0130 \u015eAHP\u018fL\u018fNG AZ\u018fR": "D097__\u018fZ\u0130ML\u0130 \u015eAHP\u018fL\u018fNG AZ\u018fR", "D098__ABBASOV RUSLAN \u018fLF\u018fS\u0130YAB": "D098__ABBASOV RUSLAN \u018fLF\u018fS\u0130YAB", "D098__BABAYEVA G\u00dcLS\u00dcM M\u00dcR\u00c5\u009e\u00dcD": "D098__BABAYEVA G\u00dcLS\u00dcM M\u00dcR\u00c5\u009e\u00dcD", "D098__BAYRAMOV H\u00dcSEYN SAB\u00c4\u00b0R": "D098__BAYRAMOV H\u00dcSEYN SAB\u00c4\u00b0R", "D098__F\u018fT\u0130YEV XANLAR NURU": "D098__F\u018fT\u0130YEV XANLAR NURU", "D098__QUL\u0130YEV QULU QURBAN": "D098__QUL\u0130YEV QULU QURBAN", "D098__R\u00c6\u008fH\u00c4\u00b0MOVA M\u00c6\u008fHLUQ\u00c6\u008f G\u00dcLM\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fD": "D098__R\u00c6\u008fH\u00c4\u00b0MOVA M\u00c6\u008fHLUQ\u00c6\u008f G\u00dcLM\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fD", "D098__S\u018fF\u018fROV NAM\u0130Q MUSA": "D098__S\u018fF\u018fROV NAM\u0130Q MUSA", "D098__\u018fS\u018fDOV GARAY X\u018fL\u0130L": "D098__\u018fS\u018fDOV GARAY X\u018fL\u0130L", "D099__ABBASZAD\u00c6\u008f G\u00dcLL\u00dc \u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0": "D099__ABBASZAD\u00c6\u008f G\u00dcLL\u00dc \u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0", "D099__H\u00dcSEYNOV MURAD EL\u00c5\u009eAD": "D099__H\u00dcSEYNOV MURAD EL\u00c5\u009eAD", "D099__QUL\u0130YEV C\u018fLAL CAMAL": "D099__QUL\u0130YEV C\u018fLAL CAMAL", "D099__TA\u011eIZAD\u018f R\u018fFA\u0130L ALI": "D099__TA\u011eIZAD\u018f R\u018fFA\u0130L ALI", "D099__YILDIRIM FATMA V\u0130DAD\u0130": "D099__YILDIRIM FATMA V\u0130DAD\u0130", "D099__\u00c4\u00b0SMAYILOV M\u00dcBAR\u00c4\u00b0Z Q\u00c6\u008fD\u00c4\u00b0R": "D099__\u00c4\u00b0SMAYILOV M\u00dcBAR\u00c4\u00b0Z Q\u00c6\u008fD\u00c4\u00b0R", "D099__\u0130SAYEVA AY\u015e\u018fN AR\u0130F": "D099__\u0130SAYEVA AY\u015e\u018fN AR\u0130F", "D099__\u018fHM\u018fDOV \u015eAH\u0130N \u018fL\u0130": "D099__\u018fHM\u018fDOV \u015eAH\u0130N \u018fL\u0130", "D100__BAYRAMOV KAMRAN F\u018fRHAD": "D100__BAYRAMOV KAMRAN F\u018fRHAD", "D100__C\u018fF\u018fROV F\u018fXR\u0130 FA\u0130Q": "D100__C\u018fF\u018fROV F\u018fXR\u0130 FA\u0130Q", "D100__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV NAD\u0130R M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fM": "D100__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV NAD\u0130R M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fM", "D100__R\u018fH\u0130ML\u0130 AYT\u018fN AR\u0130F": "D100__R\u018fH\u0130ML\u0130 AYT\u018fN AR\u0130F", "D100__\u0130SMAYILOV TO\u011eRUL YUN\u0130S": "D100__\u0130SMAYILOV TO\u011eRUL YUN\u0130S", "D100__\u018fHM\u018fDOVA SEV\u0130L B\u018fHRAM": "D100__\u018fHM\u018fDOVA SEV\u0130L B\u018fHRAM", "D100__\u018fL\u0130YEV ELTAC POLAD": "D100__\u018fL\u0130YEV ELTAC POLAD", "D101__H\u018fS\u018fNOV SAM\u0130R CEYHUN": "D101__H\u018fS\u018fNOV SAM\u0130R CEYHUN", "D101__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV QURBAN RAS\u0130M": "D101__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV QURBAN RAS\u0130M", "D101__QURBANLI M\u00dcBAR\u00c4\u00b0Z Q\u00c6\u008fHR\u00c6\u008fMAN": "D101__QURBANLI M\u00dcBAR\u00c4\u00b0Z Q\u00c6\u008fHR\u00c6\u008fMAN", "D101__YUS\u0130FOV TEYMUR SAH\u0130B": "D101__YUS\u0130FOV TEYMUR SAH\u0130B", "D101__\u00c4\u00b0BRAH\u00c4\u00b0MOVA K\u00d6N\u00dcL Q\u00dcDR\u00c6\u008fT": "D101__\u00c4\u00b0BRAH\u00c4\u00b0MOVA K\u00d6N\u00dcL Q\u00dcDR\u00c6\u008fT", "D101__\u0130SALI \u015eAH\u0130R\u018f \u0130LYAS": "D101__\u0130SALI \u015eAH\u0130R\u018f \u0130LYAS", "D101__\u018fKB\u018fROV ET\u0130BAR SUCAN": "D101__\u018fKB\u018fROV ET\u0130BAR SUCAN", "D101__\u018fSG\u018fROV \u0130LK\u0130N D\u0130LQ\u018fM": "D101__\u018fSG\u018fROV \u0130LK\u0130N D\u0130LQ\u018fM", "D102__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV Q\u018fD\u0130M Q\u018fD\u0130R": "D102__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV Q\u018fD\u0130M Q\u018fD\u0130R", "D102__NAMAZOV Q\u018fZ\u018fNF\u018fR NAT\u0130Q": "D102__NAMAZOV Q\u018fZ\u018fNF\u018fR NAT\u0130Q", "D102__QAFAROVA SAH\u0130B\u018f \u018fL\u0130": "D102__QAFAROVA SAH\u0130B\u018f \u018fL\u0130", "D102__QURBANOV F\u0130ZUL\u0130 \u0130SMAYIL": "D102__QURBANOV F\u0130ZUL\u0130 \u0130SMAYIL", "D102__S\u018fF\u018fROVA SAM\u0130R\u018f M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD": "D102__S\u018fF\u018fROVA SAM\u0130R\u018f M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD", "D102__\u0130MANLI RAS\u0130M MEHMAN": "D102__\u0130MANLI RAS\u0130M MEHMAN", "D102__\u018fL\u0130YEV SAH\u0130B YAQUB": "D102__\u018fL\u0130YEV SAH\u0130B YAQUB", "D102__\u018fL\u0130YEVA S\u018fMA NAT\u0130Q": "D102__\u018fL\u0130YEVA S\u018fMA NAT\u0130Q", "D103__ALIYEV TO\u011eRUL ZAB\u0130L": "D103__ALIYEV TO\u011eRUL ZAB\u0130L", "D103__H\u018fS\u018fNOV NURLAN URFAN": "D103__H\u018fS\u018fNOV NURLAN URFAN", "D103__H\u018fS\u018fNOVA ARZU L\u018fT\u0130FOVNA": "D103__H\u018fS\u018fNOVA ARZU L\u018fT\u0130FOVNA", "D103__R\u018fH\u0130ML\u0130 MURAD ELMAN": "D103__R\u018fH\u0130ML\u0130 MURAD ELMAN", "D103__\u0130BRAH\u0130MOV S\u018fDDAM \u0130SMAYIL": "D103__\u0130BRAH\u0130MOV S\u018fDDAM \u0130SMAYIL", "D103__\u018fL\u0130YEV SAM\u0130R H\u018f\u015e\u0130M": "D103__\u018fL\u0130YEV SAM\u0130R H\u018f\u015e\u0130M", "D103__\u018fSG\u018fROVA RUZ\u0130Y\u018f \u018fSG\u018fR": "D103__\u018fSG\u018fROVA RUZ\u0130Y\u018f \u018fSG\u018fR", "D104__H\u00dcSEYNOVA SEV\u00c4\u00b0NC \u00c6\u008fM\u00c4\u00b0R\u00c6\u008fHM\u00c6\u008fD": "D104__H\u00dcSEYNOVA SEV\u00c4\u00b0NC \u00c6\u008fM\u00c4\u00b0R\u00c6\u008fHM\u00c6\u008fD", "D104__M\u018fMM\u018fD SAH\u0130B CAMAL": "D104__M\u018fMM\u018fD SAH\u0130B CAMAL", "D104__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV SAB\u0130R RZA": "D104__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV SAB\u0130R RZA", "D104__QARAYEV FAY\u0130Q SARI": "D104__QARAYEV FAY\u0130Q SARI", "D104__R\u018fH\u0130MZAD\u018f S\u018fNAN \u0130MAN": "D104__R\u018fH\u0130MZAD\u018f S\u018fNAN \u0130MAN", "D104__\u018fL\u0130YEV \u018fZ\u0130Z NOVRUZ": "D104__\u018fL\u0130YEV \u018fZ\u0130Z NOVRUZ", "D104__\u018fL\u0130YEVA ELM\u0130RA F\u018fHRAD": "D104__\u018fL\u0130YEVA ELM\u0130RA F\u018fHRAD", "D105__H\u00dcSEYNOV \u00c4\u00b0LK\u00c4\u00b0N ABBAS": "D105__H\u00dcSEYNOV \u00c4\u00b0LK\u00c4\u00b0N ABBAS", "D105__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV NEM\u018fT MAHMUD": "D105__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV NEM\u018fT MAHMUD", "D105__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA RAM\u0130D\u018f \u0130MRAN": "D105__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA RAM\u0130D\u018f \u0130MRAN", "D105__NA\u011eIYEV ARZU N\u018fS\u0130B": "D105__NA\u011eIYEV ARZU N\u018fS\u0130B", "D105__QARAYEV N\u00c4\u00b0ZAM\u00c4\u00b0 M\u00dcSL\u00dcM": "D105__QARAYEV N\u00c4\u00b0ZAM\u00c4\u00b0 M\u00dcSL\u00dcM", "D105__QURBANOV EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N \u00c4\u00b0BAD": "D105__QURBANOV EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N \u00c4\u00b0BAD", "D105__\u0130SMAYILZAD\u018f TURAL NOVRUZ": "D105__\u0130SMAYILZAD\u018f TURAL NOVRUZ", "D106__BABAYEVA BAHAR VAQ\u0130F": "D106__BABAYEVA BAHAR VAQ\u0130F", "D106__H\u018fS\u018fNOV KAMRAN C\u018fM\u0130L": "D106__H\u018fS\u018fNOV KAMRAN C\u018fM\u0130L", "D106__QASIMOVA G\u00dcNEL TAH\u00c4\u00b0R": "D106__QASIMOVA G\u00dcNEL TAH\u00c4\u00b0R", "D106__S\u018fF\u018fROV N\u0130ZAM\u0130 ABDULLA": "D106__S\u018fF\u018fROV N\u0130ZAM\u0130 ABDULLA", "D106__\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0NG\u00c4\u00b0ZZAD\u00c6\u008f \u00c7\u00c4\u00b0NG\u00c4\u00b0Z N\u00c6\u008fS\u00c4\u00b0M\u00c4\u00b0": "D106__\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0NG\u00c4\u00b0ZZAD\u00c6\u008f \u00c7\u00c4\u00b0NG\u00c4\u00b0Z N\u00c6\u008fS\u00c4\u00b0M\u00c4\u00b0", "D106__\u018fSK\u018fROVA T\u018fRAN\u018f YUS\u0130F": "D106__\u018fSK\u018fROVA T\u018fRAN\u018f YUS\u0130F", "D107__ASLANOVA HUMAY TOF\u0130Q": "D107__ASLANOVA HUMAY TOF\u0130Q", "D107__A\u00c4\u009eAYEVA \u00dcLV\u00c4\u00b0YY\u00c6\u008f CAVAN\u00c5\u009e\u00c4\u00b0R": "D107__A\u00c4\u009eAYEVA \u00dcLV\u00c4\u00b0YY\u00c6\u008f CAVAN\u00c5\u009e\u00c4\u00b0R", "D107__G\u00d6Y\u00dc\u00c5\u009eOV RAM\u00c4\u00b0L VAH\u00c4\u00b0D": "D107__G\u00d6Y\u00dc\u00c5\u009eOV RAM\u00c4\u00b0L VAH\u00c4\u00b0D", "D107__HACIYEVA M\u018fLAH\u018fT MUSA": "D107__HACIYEVA M\u018fLAH\u018fT MUSA", "D107__MURQUZOV MUSA Q\u018fM\u018fT": "D107__MURQUZOV MUSA Q\u018fM\u018fT", "D107__MUSAZAD\u018f K\u018fMAL\u018f MEHRALI": "D107__MUSAZAD\u018f K\u018fMAL\u018f MEHRALI", "D107__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA MEHR\u0130BAN M\u018fMM\u018fD": "D107__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA MEHR\u0130BAN M\u018fMM\u018fD", "D108__K\u00c6\u008fR\u00c4\u00b0MOV G\u00dcLG\u00dcN K\u00c6\u008fR\u00c4\u00b0M": "D108__K\u00c6\u008fR\u00c4\u00b0MOV G\u00dcLG\u00dcN K\u00c6\u008fR\u00c4\u00b0M", "D108__MANSIROVA R\u018fNA M\u0130RBABA": "D108__MANSIROVA R\u018fNA M\u0130RBABA", "D108__MEHT\u0130XANOV N\u0130CAT NAM\u0130Q": "D108__MEHT\u0130XANOV N\u0130CAT NAM\u0130Q", "D108__PA\u015eAYEV C\u018fF\u018fR TELMAN": "D108__PA\u015eAYEV C\u018fF\u018fR TELMAN", "D108__\u015e\u018fR\u0130FL\u0130 YUS\u0130F ARUZ\u018f": "D108__\u015e\u018fR\u0130FL\u0130 YUS\u0130F ARUZ\u018f", "D108__\u018fM\u0130RASLANOV AZ\u018fR KAMAL": "D108__\u018fM\u0130RASLANOV AZ\u018fR KAMAL", "D108__\u018fSG\u018fROVA F\u0130R\u018fNG\u0130Z \u0130SMAN": "D108__\u018fSG\u018fROVA F\u0130R\u018fNG\u0130Z \u0130SMAN", "D109__A\u015eIROV AVDAL MUSTAFA": "D109__A\u015eIROV AVDAL MUSTAFA", "D109__H\u00dcSEYNOV AM\u00c4\u00b0L \u00c6\u008fKB\u00c6\u008fR": "D109__H\u00dcSEYNOV AM\u00c4\u00b0L \u00c6\u008fKB\u00c6\u008fR", "D109__H\u00dcSEYNOV AZ\u00c6\u008fR \u00c5\u009eOF\u00c4\u00b0Q": "D109__H\u00dcSEYNOV AZ\u00c6\u008fR \u00c5\u009eOF\u00c4\u00b0Q", "D109__M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDOV V\u00dcQAR TAPDIQ": "D109__M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDOV V\u00dcQAR TAPDIQ", "D109__M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDOVA G\u00dcNEL ELXAN": "D109__M\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDOVA G\u00dcNEL ELXAN", "D109__NURUYEV MAHMUD \u018fJD\u018fR": "D109__NURUYEV MAHMUD \u018fJD\u018fR", "D109__SEY\u0130DOV S\u018fM\u018fD \u0130SMAYIL": "D109__SEY\u0130DOV S\u018fM\u018fD \u0130SMAYIL", "D109__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0YEVA FA\u00c4\u00b0M\u00c6\u008f H\u00dcSEYN": "D109__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0YEVA FA\u00c4\u00b0M\u00c6\u008f H\u00dcSEYN", "D110__D\u0130B\u0130ROV MUSTAFA D\u0130B\u0130R": "D110__D\u0130B\u0130ROV MUSTAFA D\u0130B\u0130R", "D110__LAYICOV CEYHUN \u0130LHAM": "D110__LAYICOV CEYHUN \u0130LHAM", "D110__MOLULOVA \u018fFSAN\u018f RAMAZAN": "D110__MOLULOVA \u018fFSAN\u018f RAMAZAN", "D110__M\u018fH\u018fM\u018fL\u0130YEV N\u018fS\u0130B M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD": "D110__M\u018fH\u018fM\u018fL\u0130YEV N\u018fS\u0130B M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD", "D110__OSMANOV R\u018f\u015eAD TOF\u0130Q": "D110__OSMANOV R\u018f\u015eAD TOF\u0130Q", "D110__PA\u00c7ALOV ELV\u00c4\u00b0N \u00c4\u00b0LHAM": "D110__PA\u00c7ALOV ELV\u00c4\u00b0N \u00c4\u00b0LHAM", "D110__SAXALOVA C\u018fM\u0130L\u018f RAMAZAN": "D110__SAXALOVA C\u018fM\u0130L\u018f RAMAZAN", "D110__S\u018fL\u0130MOVA ESLANDA CAMAL\u018fDD\u0130N": "D110__S\u018fL\u0130MOVA ESLANDA CAMAL\u018fDD\u0130N", "D111__K\u018fR\u0130ML\u0130 AZ\u018fR \u015e\u018fM\u015e\u0130D": "D111__K\u018fR\u0130ML\u0130 AZ\u018fR \u015e\u018fM\u015e\u0130D", "D111__K\u018fR\u0130MOVA F\u0130DAN \u0130BRAH\u0130M": "D111__K\u018fR\u0130MOVA F\u0130DAN \u0130BRAH\u0130M", "D111__MAHMUDOVA V\u00dcSAL\u00c6\u008f YUS\u00c4\u00b0F": "D111__MAHMUDOVA V\u00dcSAL\u00c6\u008f YUS\u00c4\u00b0F", "D111__M\u018fMM\u018fDL\u0130 MAHMUD N\u018fSR\u018fDD\u0130N": "D111__M\u018fMM\u018fDL\u0130 MAHMUD N\u018fSR\u018fDD\u0130N", "D111__XAN\u018fL\u0130ZAD\u018f B\u018fHM\u018fN TOF\u0130Q": "D111__XAN\u018fL\u0130ZAD\u018f B\u018fHM\u018fN TOF\u0130Q", "D111__Z\u018fRQANAYEVA \u0130RAD\u018f ZUMRAD": "D111__Z\u018fRQANAYEVA \u0130RAD\u018f ZUMRAD", "D111__\u00c4\u00b0SMAYILOV M\u00dcBAR\u00c4\u00b0Z \u00c4\u00b0SAQ": "D111__\u00c4\u00b0SMAYILOV M\u00dcBAR\u00c4\u00b0Z \u00c4\u00b0SAQ", "D111__\u018fF\u018fND\u0130YEV M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD S\u018fDULLAH": "D111__\u018fF\u018fND\u0130YEV M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD S\u018fDULLAH", "D112__ABBASOVA R\u00d6YA \u00c5\u009eAM\u00c4\u00b0L": "D112__ABBASOVA R\u00d6YA \u00c5\u009eAM\u00c4\u00b0L", "D112__QURBANOV \u015e\u018fMS\u018fDD\u0130N ZEYNAL": "D112__QURBANOV \u015e\u018fMS\u018fDD\u0130N ZEYNAL", "D112__XA\u015eAYEVA NA\u0130L\u018f B\u018f\u015e\u0130R": "D112__XA\u015eAYEVA NA\u0130L\u018f B\u018f\u015e\u0130R", "D112__\u0130BRAH\u0130MOV \u0130LQAR ABDURAHMAN": "D112__\u0130BRAH\u0130MOV \u0130LQAR ABDURAHMAN", "D112__\u0130SMAYILOVA AYT\u018fK\u0130N D\u0130B\u0130R": "D112__\u0130SMAYILOVA AYT\u018fK\u0130N D\u0130B\u0130R", "D112__\u015e\u0130TAYEV E\u015eQ\u0130N M\u018fMM\u018fD": "D112__\u015e\u0130TAYEV E\u015eQ\u0130N M\u018fMM\u018fD", "D112__\u018fSG\u018fROV AS\u0130F YUN\u0130S": "D112__\u018fSG\u018fROV AS\u0130F YUN\u0130S", "D113__ABDULLAYEVA G\u00dcLBAHAR M\u00c6\u008fH\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDN\u00c6\u008fB\u00c4\u00b0": "D113__ABDULLAYEVA G\u00dcLBAHAR M\u00c6\u008fH\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDN\u00c6\u008fB\u00c4\u00b0", "D113__BABAYEV NAZ\u0130M CAMAL": "D113__BABAYEV NAZ\u0130M CAMAL", "D113__H\u00dcSEY\u00c4\u00b0NOV AYDIN VAQ\u00c4\u00b0F": "D113__H\u00dcSEY\u00c4\u00b0NOV AYDIN VAQ\u00c4\u00b0F", "D113__M\u018fS\u0130ML\u0130 \u018fL\u0130 \u018fHM\u018fD": "D113__M\u018fS\u0130ML\u0130 \u018fL\u0130 \u018fHM\u018fD", "D113__QADA\u015eOVA \u015e\u018fHLA H\u018fB\u0130BULLAH": "D113__QADA\u015eOVA \u015e\u018fHLA H\u018fB\u0130BULLAH", "D113__SAYADOV M\u00c4\u00b0THAD B\u00c6\u008fH\u00c6\u008fR\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0": "D113__SAYADOV M\u00c4\u00b0THAD B\u00c6\u008fH\u00c6\u008fR\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0", "D113__\u015eAH\u0130DOV \u018fHM\u018fD \u015eA\u0130R": "D113__\u015eAH\u0130DOV \u018fHM\u018fD \u015eA\u0130R", "D113__\u018fHM\u018fDOVA ARZU L\u018fT\u0130F": "D113__\u018fHM\u018fDOVA ARZU L\u018fT\u0130F", "D113__\u018fL\u0130YEV QORXMAZ NURULLAH": "D113__\u018fL\u0130YEV QORXMAZ NURULLAH", "D113__\u018fZ\u0130ZOV TEYMUR ELMAN": "D113__\u018fZ\u0130ZOV TEYMUR ELMAN", "D114__ABDULLAYEVA N\u00dcBAR RZA": "D114__ABDULLAYEVA N\u00dcBAR RZA", "D114__CAMALOV ELNUR H\u018fS\u018fNSULTAN": "D114__CAMALOV ELNUR H\u018fS\u018fNSULTAN", "D114__M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fMOV \u018fL\u0130RZA Q\u018fHR\u018fMAN": "D114__M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fMOV \u018fL\u0130RZA Q\u018fHR\u018fMAN", "D114__ORUCOV ELNUR TAC\u018fDD\u0130N": "D114__ORUCOV ELNUR TAC\u018fDD\u0130N", "D114__QEYBULLA AD\u00c4\u00b0L \u00c6\u008fB\u00dcLF\u00c6\u008fT": "D114__QEYBULLA AD\u00c4\u00b0L \u00c6\u008fB\u00dcLF\u00c6\u008fT", "D114__RZAYEV RAZ\u0130M RZA": "D114__RZAYEV RAZ\u0130M RZA", "D114__S\u018fF\u018fRL\u0130 TAH\u0130R CAMAL": "D114__S\u018fF\u018fRL\u0130 TAH\u0130R CAMAL", "D114__\u00c4\u00b0SK\u00c6\u008fND\u00c6\u008fROV V\u00dcQAR YAPON": "D114__\u00c4\u00b0SK\u00c6\u008fND\u00c6\u008fROV V\u00dcQAR YAPON", "D115__ABDUR\u018fHMANOV X\u018fYAL AS\u0130F": "D115__ABDUR\u018fHMANOV X\u018fYAL AS\u0130F", "D115__FEYZ\u0130YEV CAVAN\u015e\u0130R \u018fYYUB": "D115__FEYZ\u0130YEV CAVAN\u015e\u0130R \u018fYYUB", "D115__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV ANAR ELXAN": "D115__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV ANAR ELXAN", "D115__Q\u018fR\u0130BL\u0130 BAKIXAN H\u018fSR\u018fT": "D115__Q\u018fR\u0130BL\u0130 BAKIXAN H\u018fSR\u018fT", "D115__SEY\u00c4\u00b0DOVA \u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fRQ\u00c4\u00b0YY\u00c6\u008f \u00c6\u008fB\u00dcLF\u00c6\u008fT": "D115__SEY\u00c4\u00b0DOVA \u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fRQ\u00c4\u00b0YY\u00c6\u008f \u00c6\u008fB\u00dcLF\u00c6\u008fT", "D115__YUS\u0130BOV N\u0130YM\u018fT YUS\u0130F": "D115__YUS\u0130BOV N\u0130YM\u018fT YUS\u0130F", "D115__\u00c5\u009e\u00dcK\u00dcR-ZAD\u00c6\u008f AZ\u00c6\u008fR M\u00c6\u008fCLUM": "D115__\u00c5\u009e\u00dcK\u00dcR-ZAD\u00c6\u008f AZ\u00c6\u008fR M\u00c6\u008fCLUM", "D115__\u0130BRAH\u0130MOVA AYB\u018fN\u0130Z M\u018fMM\u018fD": "D115__\u0130BRAH\u0130MOVA AYB\u018fN\u0130Z M\u018fMM\u018fD", "D116__ABDUR\u018fHMANOV EL\u015eAD N\u018fRMAN": "D116__ABDUR\u018fHMANOV EL\u015eAD N\u018fRMAN", "D116__K\u018fR\u0130ML\u0130 \u0130SG\u018fND\u018fR ABDULLA": "D116__K\u018fR\u0130ML\u0130 \u0130SG\u018fND\u018fR ABDULLA", "D116__MUSAYEV EL\u015e\u018fN M\u018fMM\u018fDH\u018fN\u0130F\u018f": "D116__MUSAYEV EL\u015e\u018fN M\u018fMM\u018fDH\u018fN\u0130F\u018f", "D116__MUSAZAD\u018f DURNA ELDAR": "D116__MUSAZAD\u018f DURNA ELDAR", "D116__M\u00c4\u00b0RZ\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0YEV EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N \u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0Y\u00c6\u008fDD\u00c4\u00b0N": "D116__M\u00c4\u00b0RZ\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0YEV EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N \u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0Y\u00c6\u008fDD\u00c4\u00b0N", "D116__M\u0130KAYILOV V\u018fFADAR \u0130MAM": "D116__M\u0130KAYILOV V\u018fFADAR \u0130MAM", "D116__\u00c6\u008fHM\u00c6\u008fDOV R\u00dcF\u00c6\u008fT HAK\u00c4\u00b0M": "D116__\u00c6\u008fHM\u00c6\u008fDOV R\u00dcF\u00c6\u008fT HAK\u00c4\u00b0M", "D116__\u0130LYASOV AZ\u018fR \u0130LYAS": "D116__\u0130LYASOV AZ\u018fR \u0130LYAS", "D116__\u018fL\u0130YEV MEHMAN N\u0130ZAM": "D116__\u018fL\u0130YEV MEHMAN N\u0130ZAM", "D116__\u018fL\u0130YEVA \u018fD\u0130L\u018f \u018fL\u0130": "D116__\u018fL\u0130YEVA \u018fD\u0130L\u018f \u018fL\u0130", "D117__ABDURRAZAKOV N\u0130ZAM\u0130 YAQUB": "D117__ABDURRAZAKOV N\u0130ZAM\u0130 YAQUB", "D117__A\u011eAYEV QAL\u0130B ALLAHVERD\u0130": "D117__A\u011eAYEV QAL\u0130B ALLAHVERD\u0130", "D117__F\u018fR\u018fCOVA S\u018fMAY\u018f F\u0130KR\u018fT": "D117__F\u018fR\u018fCOVA S\u018fMAY\u018f F\u0130KR\u018fT", "D117__HACIYEV EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N S\u00c6\u008fDA": "D117__HACIYEV EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N S\u00c6\u008fDA", "D117__QURBANOV EYVAZ DA\u015eD\u018fM\u0130R": "D117__QURBANOV EYVAZ DA\u015eD\u018fM\u0130R", "D117__\u00c6\u008fBD\u00dcR\u00c6\u008fHMANOV TURAL \u00c6\u008fL\u00c6\u008fSG\u00c6\u008fR": "D117__\u00c6\u008fBD\u00dcR\u00c6\u008fHMANOV TURAL \u00c6\u008fL\u00c6\u008fSG\u00c6\u008fR", "D117__\u00c6\u008fZ\u00c4\u00b0ZOVA G\u00dcNEL \u00c7\u00c4\u00b0NG\u00c4\u00b0Z": "D117__\u00c6\u008fZ\u00c4\u00b0ZOVA G\u00dcNEL \u00c7\u00c4\u00b0NG\u00c4\u00b0Z", "D117__\u0130SMAYILOV RAH\u0130B V\u018fL\u0130": "D117__\u0130SMAYILOV RAH\u0130B V\u018fL\u0130", "D118__A\u011eAYEV MUSA HAB\u0130L": "D118__A\u011eAYEV MUSA HAB\u0130L", "D118__CABBAROVA G\u00d6Z\u00c6\u008fL MEHMAN": "D118__CABBAROVA G\u00d6Z\u00c6\u008fL MEHMAN", "D118__C\u018fF\u018fROVA L\u018fMAN F\u018fXR\u018fDD\u0130N": "D118__C\u018fF\u018fROVA L\u018fMAN F\u018fXR\u018fDD\u0130N", "D118__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV ELMAN CAMAL": "D118__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV ELMAN CAMAL", "D118__\u00c6\u008fFQANLI \u00c5\u009e\u00d6VK\u00c6\u008fT MAL\u00c4\u00b0K": "D118__\u00c6\u008fFQANLI \u00c5\u009e\u00d6VK\u00c6\u008fT MAL\u00c4\u00b0K", "D118__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0YEV V\u00dcQAR Z\u00c4\u00b0Y\u00c6\u008fDD\u00c4\u00b0N": "D118__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0YEV V\u00dcQAR Z\u00c4\u00b0Y\u00c6\u008fDD\u00c4\u00b0N", "D118__\u0130SMAYILZAD\u018f CEYHUN ET\u0130BAR": "D118__\u0130SMAYILZAD\u018f CEYHUN ET\u0130BAR", "D118__\u018fL\u0130YEV EM\u0130N SAH\u0130B": "D118__\u018fL\u0130YEV EM\u0130N SAH\u0130B", "D119__BEHBUDOV H\u00dcSEYN MEHRALI": "D119__BEHBUDOV H\u00dcSEYN MEHRALI", "D119__H\u00dcSEYNOVA AYNUR\u00c6\u008f NU\u00c5\u009e\u00c4\u00b0R\u00c6\u008fVAN": "D119__H\u00dcSEYNOVA AYNUR\u00c6\u008f NU\u00c5\u009e\u00c4\u00b0R\u00c6\u008fVAN", "D119__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV AS\u0130F M\u0130LL\u018fT": "D119__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV AS\u0130F M\u0130LL\u018fT", "D119__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV \u0130BRAH\u0130M RAQ\u0130F": "D119__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV \u0130BRAH\u0130M RAQ\u0130F", "D119__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA X\u018fYAL\u018f SOLTAN": "D119__M\u018fMM\u018fDOVA X\u018fYAL\u018f SOLTAN", "D119__QASIMOV AZ\u018fR S\u018fHL\u0130K": "D119__QASIMOV AZ\u018fR S\u018fHL\u0130K", "D119__S\u018fF\u018fROV ET\u0130BAR HA\u015eIM": "D119__S\u018fF\u018fROV ET\u0130BAR HA\u015eIM", "D119__S\u018fF\u018fROVA \u015e\u018fBN\u018fM \u0130LHAM": "D119__S\u018fF\u018fROVA \u015e\u018fBN\u018fM \u0130LHAM", "D119__\u018fL\u0130YEV B\u018fXT\u0130YAR H\u018fMZ\u018f": "D119__\u018fL\u0130YEV B\u018fXT\u0130YAR H\u018fMZ\u018f", "D120__ALLAHVERD\u0130 H\u0130DAY\u018fT FEHRUZ": "D120__ALLAHVERD\u0130 H\u0130DAY\u018fT FEHRUZ", "D120__A\u011eAYEVA NAT\u018fVAN M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fM": "D120__A\u011eAYEVA NAT\u018fVAN M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fM", "D120__H\u00dcSEYNOVA G\u00dcL\u00c7\u00d6HR\u00c6\u008f A\u00c4\u009eAH\u00dcSEYN": "D120__H\u00dcSEYNOVA G\u00dcL\u00c7\u00d6HR\u00c6\u008f A\u00c4\u009eAH\u00dcSEYN", "D120__MEHD\u00c4\u00b0XANOV M\u00dc\u00c5\u009eV\u00c4\u00b0Q ALICA": "D120__MEHD\u00c4\u00b0XANOV M\u00dc\u00c5\u009eV\u00c4\u00b0Q ALICA", "D120__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV CEYHUN VALEH": "D120__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV CEYHUN VALEH", "D120__\u00c4\u00b0SMAYILOV S\u00c6\u008fRDAR \u00c6\u008fB\u00dcLF\u00c6\u008fT": "D120__\u00c4\u00b0SMAYILOV S\u00c6\u008fRDAR \u00c6\u008fB\u00dcLF\u00c6\u008fT", "D120__\u015eAHVERD\u0130YEV ARAZ V\u018fL\u0130": "D120__\u015eAHVERD\u0130YEV ARAZ V\u018fL\u0130", "D121__H\u00dcSEYNOV EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N ELXAN": "D121__H\u00dcSEYNOV EL\u00c7\u00c4\u00b0N ELXAN", "D121__K\u018fR\u0130MOV BAB\u018fK S\u018fYAVU\u015e": "D121__K\u018fR\u0130MOV BAB\u018fK S\u018fYAVU\u015e", "D121__MURADOV R\u00d6V\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN \u00c5\u009eAHBAZ": "D121__MURADOV R\u00d6V\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN \u00c5\u009eAHBAZ", "D121__M\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0KOV \u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0 \u00c5\u009e\u00dcK\u00dcR": "D121__M\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0KOV \u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0 \u00c5\u009e\u00dcK\u00dcR", "D121__QULUYEVA K\u00c6\u008fMAL\u00c6\u008f R\u00d6V\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN": "D121__QULUYEVA K\u00c6\u008fMAL\u00c6\u008f R\u00d6V\u00c5\u009e\u00c6\u008fN", "D121__\u0130BADZAD\u018f EM\u0130N F\u018fR\u018fC": "D121__\u0130BADZAD\u018f EM\u0130N F\u018fR\u018fC", "D121__\u0130SMAYILOV FA\u0130Q \u0130SLAM": "D121__\u0130SMAYILOV FA\u0130Q \u0130SLAM", "D121__\u018fHM\u018fDOV \u018fKR\u018fM RAM\u0130Z": "D121__\u018fHM\u018fDOV \u018fKR\u018fM RAM\u0130Z", "D122__G\u018fNC\u018fL\u0130YEV TURAL BABA\u015eAH": "D122__G\u018fNC\u018fL\u0130YEV TURAL BABA\u015eAH", "D122__H\u00dcMB\u00c6\u008fTOV ZAM\u00c4\u00b0N Q\u00dcRB\u00c6\u008fT": "D122__H\u00dcMB\u00c6\u008fTOV ZAM\u00c4\u00b0N Q\u00dcRB\u00c6\u008fT", "D122__KAZIMOVA AYTAC ELXAN": "D122__KAZIMOVA AYTAC ELXAN", "D122__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV AQ\u0130L KAMRAN": "D122__M\u018fMM\u018fDOV AQ\u0130L KAMRAN", "D122__OQTAYZAD\u018f JAL\u018f BAB\u018fK": "D122__OQTAYZAD\u018f JAL\u018f BAB\u018fK", "D122__QUL\u0130YEVA \u015e\u018fF\u018fQ AD\u0130L": "D122__QUL\u0130YEVA \u015e\u018fF\u018fQ AD\u0130L", "D123__ABBASOV ET\u0130BAR B\u018fHM\u018fN": "D123__ABBASOV ET\u0130BAR B\u018fHM\u018fN", "D123__BA\u011eIROV M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD YUS\u0130F": "D123__BA\u011eIROV M\u018fH\u018fMM\u018fD YUS\u0130F", "D123__C\u018fM\u0130LOVA SOLMAZ CABBAR": "D123__C\u018fM\u0130LOVA SOLMAZ CABBAR", "D123__H\u00dcSEYNOV KAM\u00c4\u00b0L H\u00c6\u008fS\u00c6\u008fN": "D123__H\u00dcSEYNOV KAM\u00c4\u00b0L H\u00c6\u008fS\u00c6\u008fN", "D123__MUXDAROV ZAH\u0130D F\u018fHRAD": "D123__MUXDAROV ZAH\u0130D F\u018fHRAD", "D123__M\u0130RZ\u018fYEV XAL\u0130D N\u018fR\u0130MAN": "D123__M\u0130RZ\u018fYEV XAL\u0130D N\u018fR\u0130MAN", "D123__ORUCOV SAM\u0130R ZAK\u0130R": "D123__ORUCOV SAM\u0130R ZAK\u0130R", "D123__QASIMLI M\u0130RC\u018fL\u0130L X\u018fQAN\u0130": "D123__QASIMLI M\u0130RC\u018fL\u0130L X\u018fQAN\u0130", "D123__S\u00dcLEYMANOV S\u00c6\u008fXAV\u00c6\u008fT ELLAZ": "D123__S\u00dcLEYMANOV S\u00c6\u008fXAV\u00c6\u008fT ELLAZ", "D123__Z\u00dcLF\u00dcQAROV R\u00c6\u008fHMAN L\u00c6\u008fT\u00c4\u00b0F": "D123__Z\u00dcLF\u00dcQAROV R\u00c6\u008fHMAN L\u00c6\u008fT\u00c4\u00b0F", "D123__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0QUL\u00c4\u00b0YEV \u00c4\u00b0SMAYIL T\u00dcRKEL \u00c6\u008fL\u00c6\u008fDD\u00c4\u00b0N": "D123__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0QUL\u00c4\u00b0YEV \u00c4\u00b0SMAYIL T\u00dcRKEL \u00c6\u008fL\u00c6\u008fDD\u00c4\u00b0N", "D123__\u018fHM\u018fDOVA A\u0130D\u018f \u018fL\u018fSG\u018fR": "D123__\u018fHM\u018fDOVA A\u0130D\u018f \u018fL\u018fSG\u018fR", "D124__BABI\u015eOVA LEYLA AD\u0130L": "D124__BABI\u015eOVA LEYLA AD\u0130L", "D124__BA\u00c4\u009eIROV G\u00dcL\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0 Q\u00c6\u008fHR\u00c6\u008fMAN": "D124__BA\u00c4\u009eIROV G\u00dcL\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0 Q\u00c6\u008fHR\u00c6\u008fMAN", "D124__B\u00dcLB\u00dcLO\u00c4\u009eLU POLAD XXX": "D124__B\u00dcLB\u00dcLO\u00c4\u009eLU POLAD XXX", "D124__G\u00dcLM\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDOV HAMLET H\u00c6\u008fSR\u00c6\u008fT": "D124__G\u00dcLM\u00c6\u008fMM\u00c6\u008fDOV HAMLET H\u00c6\u008fSR\u00c6\u008fT", "D124__NA\u011eI AK\u0130F QAZAX": "D124__NA\u011eI AK\u0130F QAZAX", "D124__S\u00dcLEYMANLI ELXAN B\u00c6\u008fHM\u00c6\u008fN": "D124__S\u00dcLEYMANLI ELXAN B\u00c6\u008fHM\u00c6\u008fN", "D124__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0YEV M\u00dcBAR\u00c4\u00b0Z YAQUB": "D124__\u00c6\u008fL\u00c4\u00b0YEV M\u00dcBAR\u00c4\u00b0Z YAQUB", "D125__ALIYEV \u0130NT\u0130QAM VALEH": "D125__ALIYEV \u0130NT\u0130QAM VALEH", "D125__AXUNDOVA SEV\u0130L M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fM": "D125__AXUNDOVA SEV\u0130L M\u018fH\u018fRR\u018fM", "D125__HACIYEV OKTAY C\u018fF\u018fR": "D125__HACIYEV OKTAY C\u018fF\u018fR", "D125__QOCAYEV CEYHUN TAH\u0130R": "D125__QOCAYEV CEYHUN TAH\u0130R", "D125__\u0130SMAYILOV \u0130MAMVERD\u0130 \u0130B\u0130\u015e": "D125__\u0130SMAYILOV \u0130MAMVERD\u0130 \u0130B\u0130\u015e", "D125__\u018fL\u0130ZAD\u018f RAM\u0130N ALLAHVERD\u0130": "D125__\u018fL\u0130ZAD\u018f RAM\u0130N ALLAHVERD\u0130", "D125__\u018fL\u018fSG\u018fROVA N\u0130GAR ELMAN": "D125__\u018fL\u018fSG\u018fROVA N\u0130GAR ELMAN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6478, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 6478}, "n_stations_flagged": 6478, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:52:08.799205", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.291, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.5, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.174, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.053, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.291, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.073, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.5, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 0.608, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.152, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.162, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.075, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.019, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.362, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.203, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.174, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.174, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.053, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.053, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.115, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.115, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.302, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.302, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.013, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.013, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.118, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.118, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6478}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cea10c4d9834456ea25d16fa4991c2fd", "name": "Austria 2024 parliamentary (overnight austria_2024_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Austria", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.data.gv.at/datasets/e40e3b00-1a98-4338-acb7-42547e6fee55 (BMI official final result, file wahl_20241003_214746.csv, CC-BY-4.0)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u00d6VP": "\u00d6VP", "SP\u00d6": "SP\u00d6", "FP\u00d6": "FP\u00d6", "GR\u00dcNE": "GR\u00dcNE", "NEOS": "NEOS", "BIER": "BIER", "MFG": "MFG", "BGE": "BGE", "LMP": "LMP", "GAZA": "GAZA", "KP\u00d6": "KP\u00d6", "KEINE": "KEINE"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2279, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 164, "cast_gt_registered": 162}, "n_stations_flagged": 164, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:51:51.444811", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.802, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.882, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.84, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.762, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.802, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.882, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.542, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.114, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2279}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "77c8c524715e4c0db2531e95d039e154", "name": "Greece 2023 parliamentary (overnight greece_2023may_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Greece", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "http://ekloges-prev.singularlogic.eu/2023/may/dyn/v/dhm_{code}.js (official MoI/SingularLogic results backend behind https://ekloges.ypes.gr/current/v/public/)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"municipality_code": "municipality_code", "district_code": "district_code", "nd_2": "nd_2", "kke_3": "kke_3", "syriza_4": "syriza_4", "mlkkke_10": "mlkkke_10", "oakke_11": "oakke_11", "enosi_kentroon_15": "enosi_kentroon_15", "vergis_20": "vergis_20", "oikologoi_prasinoi_28": "oikologoi_prasinoi_28", "antarsya_44": "antarsya_44", "kotes_54": "kotes_54", "ethDim_60": "ethDim_60", "okde_66": "okde_66", "axia_85": "axia_85", "pasok_106": "pasok_106", "ellinikiLysi_108": "ellinikiLysi_108", "elsyn_113": "elsyn_113", "mera25_122": "mera25_122", "pleusi_123": "pleusi_123", "kkeml_125": "kkeml_125", "enono_128": "enono_128", "kinima21_129": "kinima21_129", "kinimaftoxon_130": "kinimaftoxon_130", "niki_131": "niki_131", "orama_132": "orama_132", "krama_133": "krama_133", "tolma_134": "tolma_134", "simaxeia_anatropis_135": "simaxeia_anatropis_135", "ndomi_136": "ndomi_136", "polprot_137": "polprot_137", "eleutheroi_ksana_138": "eleutheroi_ksana_138", "social_139": "social_139", "pnoi_dimokratias_140": "pnoi_dimokratias_140", "prasino_kinima_141": "prasino_kinima_141", "ean_142": "ean_142", "ena_143": "ena_143", "anex_memon_998": "anex_memon_998"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 332, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 332}, "n_stations_flagged": 332, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:51:49.538556", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.946, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.735, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.573, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.771, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.443, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.644, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.253, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.735, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.807, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.24, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.24, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.798, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 332}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f370f7bcf2f24279b4cb1b812e9caad2", "name": "Cote d'Ivoire 2025 presidential (overnight cote_divoire_2025_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cote d'Ivoire", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.cei.ci/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/EPR_2025_RESULTAT_NATIONAL.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ALASSANE_OUATTARA_RHDP": "ALASSANE_OUATTARA_RHDP", "BILLON_JEAN_LOUIS_INDEPENDANT": "BILLON_JEAN_LOUIS_INDEPENDANT", "EHIVET_SIMONE_GBAGBO_MGC": "EHIVET_SIMONE_GBAGBO_MGC", "LAGOU_HENRIETTE_GP_PAIX": "LAGOU_HENRIETTE_GP_PAIX", "DON_MELLO_AHOUA_CODE": "DON_MELLO_AHOUA_CODE"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 142, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:51:48.441539", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 142}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3d74338295f14510ab1f55024323be1c", "name": "Singapore 2025 parliamentary (overnight singapore_2025_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Singapore", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.gov.sg/datasets/d_581a30bee57fa7d8383d6bc94739ad00 (results by candidate) + https://data.gov.sg/datasets/d_fdfb854fcb7428b29734d2e0c0674220 (registered electors, rejected, spoilt) ; official portal https://www.eld.gov.sg/finalresults2025.html", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Independent": "Independent", "NSP": "NSP", "PAP": "PAP", "PAR": "PAR", "PPP": "PPP", "PSP": "PSP", "RDU": "RDU", "SDA": "SDA", "SDP": "SDP", "SPP": "SPP", "SUP": "SUP", "WP": "WP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 32, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:51:47.802087", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.773, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.9, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.434, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.36, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.773, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.693, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.9, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.594, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.562, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.148, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.076, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.019, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.434, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.36, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.36, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.37, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.013, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.013, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 32}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e0167941c1b04aa1a2efd312caf818e5", "name": "Egypt 2024 presidential (overnight egypt_2024_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Egypt", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.elections.eg/static/pres_2024_result_by_gov/data/<govid>.html", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Sisi": "Sisi", "Hazem_Omar": "Hazem_Omar", "Farid_Zahran": "Farid_Zahran", "Yamama": "Yamama"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 27, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 27, "registered_not_positive": 27}, "n_stations_flagged": 27, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:51:47.134670", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.884, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.118, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.186, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.123, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.221, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.118, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.222, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.242, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.202, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.541, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.385, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.214, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.186, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.123, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.123, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.107, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.107, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.243, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.243, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.729, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.178, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.178, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 27}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4c82e42110874974ba9bb70b19b51bc4", "name": "Mongolia 2024 parliamentary (overnight mongolia_2024_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mongolia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "13 toirog (multi-member constituencies), 2024 mixed MNTV+PR election. CAUTION: majoritarian tier is BLOCK VOTING - each voter casts 2-10 candidate votes, so party columns are candidate-vote sums and votes/registered ratios (1.3-7.2) are NOT turnout. Do not reconcile against registered. Party totals reproduce official: MPP 3,619,950 (38.64%), DP 3,135,988 (33.48%).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"reporting_pct": "reporting_pct", "total_candidate_votes": "total_candidate_votes", "\u041c\u0410\u041d": "\u041c\u0410\u041d", "\u0410\u041d": "\u0410\u041d", "\u0425\u04ae\u041d": "\u0425\u04ae\u041d", "\u04ae\u042d": "\u04ae\u042d", "\u0418\u0417\u041d\u041d": "\u0418\u0417\u041d\u041d", "\u0428\u041d\u042d": "\u0428\u041d\u042d", "\u0411\u0414": "\u0411\u0414", "\u04ae\u0411\u0417\u041d": "\u04ae\u0411\u0417\u041d", "\u0418\u0425\u041d": "\u0418\u0425\u041d", "\u0411\u041d\u041d": "\u0411\u041d\u041d", "\u0410\u0422\u0425\u041d": "\u0410\u0422\u0425\u041d", "\u0418\u041e\u041d\u041d": "\u0418\u041e\u041d\u041d", "\u042d\u041e\u041d": "\u042d\u041e\u041d", "\u042d\u0427\u042d\u041d": "\u042d\u0427\u042d\u041d", "\u0421\u0410\u0418\u041d\u041d": "\u0421\u0410\u0418\u041d\u041d", "\u041c\u0425\u0422\u041d": "\u041c\u0425\u0422\u041d", "\u0410\u0422\u041e\u0417\u041d": "\u0410\u0422\u041e\u0417\u041d", "\u042d\u0425\u041d": "\u042d\u0425\u041d", "\u041c\u041a\u041d": "\u041c\u041a\u041d", "\u041c\u0421\u0414\u041d": "\u041c\u0421\u0414\u041d", "\u041c\u043e\u041b\u0410\u041d": "\u041c\u043e\u041b\u0410\u041d", "\u042d\u041e\u041d\u041d": "\u042d\u041e\u041d\u041d"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 13}, "n_stations_flagged": 13, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:51:46.621425", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.886, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.577, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.498, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.385, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.577, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.968, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.653, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.005, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.258, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.565, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.498, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.498, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.385, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.385, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.352, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.352, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.753, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.753, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.687, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 13}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "70521e5f72344736bbad1e6225cbc713", "name": "Kuwait 2024 parliamentary (overnight kuwait_2024_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Kuwait", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.alanba.com.kw/elections/candidate.aspx?c=38..42 (Al-Anba newspaper election portal, mirrors Ministry of Interior official tallies)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"D1_r01_\u0627\u0633\u0627\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u062f": "D1_r01_\u0627\u0633\u0627\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u062f", "D1_r02_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0636\u0641": "D1_r02_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0636\u0641", "D1_r03_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062c\u0648\u0647\u0631 \u062d\u064a\u0627\u062a": "D1_r03_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062c\u0648\u0647\u0631 \u062d\u064a\u0627\u062a", "D1_r04_\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0644\u0627\u0631\u064a": "D1_r04_\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0644\u0627\u0631\u064a", "D1_r05_\u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0646\u062f\u0631\u064a": "D1_r05_\u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0646\u062f\u0631\u064a", "D1_r06_\u0628\u0627\u0633\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u062d\u0631\u0627\u0646\u064a": "D1_r06_\u0628\u0627\u0633\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u062d\u0631\u0627\u0646\u064a", "D1_r07_\u0639\u0627\u062f\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0645\u062e\u064a": "D1_r07_\u0639\u0627\u062f\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0645\u062e\u064a", "D1_r08_\u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0645\u0627\u0631": "D1_r08_\u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0645\u0627\u0631", "D1_r09_\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0639\u0627\u0634\u0648\u0631": "D1_r09_\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0639\u0627\u0634\u0648\u0631", "D1_r10_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0627\u0647\u0648\u0645": "D1_r10_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0627\u0647\u0648\u0645", "D1_r11_\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f\u0644\u062c": "D1_r11_\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f\u0644\u062c", "D1_r12_\u0639\u0644\u064a \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0646\u0635\u064a\u0631": "D1_r12_\u0639\u0644\u064a \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0646\u0635\u064a\u0631", "D1_r13_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u0631": "D1_r13_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u0631", "D1_r14_\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649": "D1_r14_\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649", "D1_r15_\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0634\u062d\u0648\u0645\u064a": "D1_r15_\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0634\u062d\u0648\u0645\u064a", "D1_r16_\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u0628\u0631\u064a": "D1_r16_\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u0628\u0631\u064a", "D1_r17_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0635\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0632\u0627\u0647\u062f": "D1_r17_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0635\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0632\u0627\u0647\u062f", "D1_r18_\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0646\u062f\u0631\u064a": "D1_r18_\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0646\u062f\u0631\u064a", "D1_r19_\u0645\u064a\u062b\u0645 \u0639\u0648\u0636": "D1_r19_\u0645\u064a\u062b\u0645 \u0639\u0648\u0636", "D1_r20_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0631\u064a\u062c\u064a": "D1_r20_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0631\u064a\u062c\u064a", "D1_r21_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0648\u0645\u064a": "D1_r21_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0648\u0645\u064a", "D1_r22_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0631\u0632": "D1_r22_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0631\u0632", "D1_r23_\u0646\u0627\u0635\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0635\u0631\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647": "D1_r23_\u0646\u0627\u0635\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0635\u0631\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647", "D1_r24_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0647\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0646\u062f\u0631\u064a": "D1_r24_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0647\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0646\u062f\u0631\u064a", "D1_r25_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0647\u064a\u0644": "D1_r25_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0647\u064a\u0644", "D1_r26_\u0641\u0627\u0637\u0645\u0629 \u0643\u0631\u0645": "D1_r26_\u0641\u0627\u0637\u0645\u0629 \u0643\u0631\u0645", "D1_r27_\u0639\u064a\u0633\u064a \u062d\u062c\u064a \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649": "D1_r27_\u0639\u064a\u0633\u064a \u062d\u062c\u064a \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649", "D1_r28_\u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0628\u0647\u0628\u0647\u0627\u0646\u064a": "D1_r28_\u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0628\u0647\u0628\u0647\u0627\u0646\u064a", "D1_r29_\u0639\u0644\u064a \u062f\u0627\u0648\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f": "D1_r29_\u0639\u0644\u064a \u062f\u0627\u0648\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f", "D1_r30_\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0644\u0648\u0634\u064a": "D1_r30_\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0644\u0648\u0634\u064a", "D1_r31_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062d\u0627\u062c\u064a\u0647 \u0645\u0638\u0641\u0631": "D1_r31_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062d\u0627\u062c\u064a\u0647 \u0645\u0638\u0641\u0631", "D1_r32_\u0648\u0644\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0628\u0646\u062f\u064a": "D1_r32_\u0648\u0644\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0628\u0646\u062f\u064a", "D1_r33_\u062d\u0645\u0632\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u064a\u0627\u0646": "D1_r33_\u062d\u0645\u0632\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u064a\u0627\u0646", "D1_r34_\u0641\u062e\u0631\u064a \u0647\u0627\u0634\u0645 \u0633\u064a\u062f": "D1_r34_\u0641\u062e\u0631\u064a \u0647\u0627\u0634\u0645 \u0633\u064a\u062f", "D1_r35_\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0628\u0646 \u0632\u064a\u062f": "D1_r35_\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0628\u0646 \u0632\u064a\u062f", "D1_r36_\u062c\u0631\u0627\u062d \u063a\u0644\u0648\u0645": "D1_r36_\u062c\u0631\u0627\u062d \u063a\u0644\u0648\u0645", "D1_r37_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0638\u0627\u0641\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062c\u0645\u064a": "D1_r37_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0638\u0627\u0641\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062c\u0645\u064a", "D1_r38_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u062e\u0644\u0627\u0648\u064a": "D1_r38_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u062e\u0644\u0627\u0648\u064a", "D1_r39_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0646\u062f \u062d\u0646\u064a\u0641": "D1_r39_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0646\u062f \u062d\u0646\u064a\u0641", "D1_r40_\u0641\u0647\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u0632\u0639\u0644": "D1_r40_\u0641\u0647\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u0632\u0639\u0644", "D1_r41_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0628\u0627\u0632": "D1_r41_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0628\u0627\u0632", "D2_r01_\u0645\u0631\u0632\u0648\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u063a\u0627\u0646\u0645": "D2_r01_\u0645\u0631\u0632\u0648\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u063a\u0627\u0646\u0645", "D2_r02_\u0634\u0639\u064a\u0628 \u0634\u0639\u0628\u0627\u0646": "D2_r02_\u0634\u0639\u064a\u0628 \u0634\u0639\u0628\u0627\u0646", "D2_r03_\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0647\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u064a\u0633\u064a": "D2_r03_\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0647\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u064a\u0633\u064a", "D2_r04_\u0641\u0644\u0627\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062c\u0631\u064a": "D2_r04_\u0641\u0644\u0627\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062c\u0631\u064a", "D2_r05_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u064a\u0631": "D2_r05_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u064a\u0631", "D2_r06_\u0628\u062f\u0631 \u0646\u0634\u0645\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0646\u0632\u064a": "D2_r06_\u0628\u062f\u0631 \u0646\u0634\u0645\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0646\u0632\u064a", "D2_r07_\u0646\u0648\u0627\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0632\u0645\u064a": "D2_r07_\u0646\u0648\u0627\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0632\u0645\u064a", "D2_r08_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0646\u0628\u0639\u0649": "D2_r08_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0646\u0628\u0639\u0649", "D2_r09_\u0628\u062f\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0644\u0627": "D2_r09_\u0628\u062f\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0644\u0627", "D2_r10_\u0641\u0647\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0633\u0639\u0648\u062f": "D2_r10_\u0641\u0647\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0633\u0639\u0648\u062f", "D2_r11_\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0645\u062f": "D2_r11_\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0645\u062f", "D2_r12_\u0645\u0646\u0635\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0631\u0647\u064a\u062f": "D2_r12_\u0645\u0646\u0635\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0631\u0647\u064a\u062f", "D2_r13_\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u0631": "D2_r13_\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u0631", "D2_r14_\u0647\u0648\u064a\u062f\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062c\u0631\u0649": "D2_r14_\u0647\u0648\u064a\u062f\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062c\u0631\u0649", "D2_r15_\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0630\u0627\u0644\u064a": "D2_r15_\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0630\u0627\u0644\u064a", "D2_r16_\u0645\u062b\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0630\u0627\u0644\u064a": "D2_r16_\u0645\u062b\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0630\u0627\u0644\u064a", "D2_r17_\u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0628\u0637\u0628\u0627\u0626\u064a": "D2_r17_\u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0628\u0637\u0628\u0627\u0626\u064a", "D2_r18_\u062b\u0627\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0646\u0632\u064a": "D2_r18_\u062b\u0627\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0646\u0632\u064a", "D2_r19_\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0645\u0631\u0649": "D2_r19_\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0645\u0631\u0649", "D2_r20_\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d": "D2_r20_\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d", "D2_r21_\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0642\u0628\u0627\u0633\u064a": "D2_r21_\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0642\u0628\u0627\u0633\u064a", "D2_r22_\u0633\u0639\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0637\u064a\u0646": "D2_r22_\u0633\u0639\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0637\u064a\u0646", "D2_r23_\u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0646\u0632\u064a": "D2_r23_\u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0646\u0632\u064a", "D2_r24_\u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0648\u0632\u0627\u0646": "D2_r24_\u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0648\u0632\u0627\u0646", "D2_r25_\u0633\u0639\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0641\u062c\u064a": "D2_r25_\u0633\u0639\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0641\u062c\u064a", "D2_r26_\u0641\u0647\u062f \u0633\u0645\u0627\u0648\u0649": "D2_r26_\u0641\u0647\u062f \u0633\u0645\u0627\u0648\u0649", "D2_r27_\u0637\u0644\u0627\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0645\u0631\u064a": "D2_r27_\u0637\u0644\u0627\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0645\u0631\u064a", "D2_r28_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0647\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0637\u0627\u0646": "D2_r28_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0647\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0637\u0627\u0646", "D2_r29_\u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u064a\u062f\u0649": "D2_r29_\u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u064a\u062f\u0649", "D2_r30_\u0634\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0621 \u0646\u0627\u0635\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062c\u0631\u064a": "D2_r30_\u0634\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0621 \u0646\u0627\u0635\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062c\u0631\u064a", "D2_r31_\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0639\u064a\u0643\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062c\u0645\u064a": "D2_r31_\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0639\u064a\u0643\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062c\u0645\u064a", "D2_r32_\u0647\u0632\u0627\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u062f\u0628\u0629": "D2_r32_\u0647\u0632\u0627\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u062f\u0628\u0629", "D2_r33_\u0628\u0634\u0627\u0631 \u0643\u0627\u0638\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u064a": "D2_r33_\u0628\u0634\u0627\u0631 \u0643\u0627\u0638\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u064a", "D2_r34_\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0639\u0627\u062f\u0644 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646": "D2_r34_\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0639\u0627\u062f\u0644 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646", "D2_r35_\u0648\u0644\u064a\u062f \u0634\u0647\u0627\u0628": "D2_r35_\u0648\u0644\u064a\u062f \u0634\u0647\u0627\u0628", "D2_r36_\u0645\u0634\u0639\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0631\u064a": "D2_r36_\u0645\u0634\u0639\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0631\u064a", "D2_r37_\u0641\u0647\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u064a\u062f": "D2_r37_\u0641\u0647\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u064a\u062f", "D2_r38_\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u064a\u0632": "D2_r38_\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u064a\u0632", "D2_r39_\u062c\u0627\u0628\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0648\u0644\u064a": "D2_r39_\u062c\u0627\u0628\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0648\u0644\u064a", "D3_r01_\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0646\u062f\u0631\u064a": "D3_r01_\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0646\u062f\u0631\u064a", "D3_r02_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u064a\u0632 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0642\u0639\u0628\u064a": "D3_r02_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u064a\u0632 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0642\u0639\u0628\u064a", "D3_r03_\u0645\u0647\u0644\u0647\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0636\u0641": "D3_r03_\u0645\u0647\u0644\u0647\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0636\u0641", "D3_r04_\u0641\u0627\u0631\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062a\u064a\u0628\u064a": "D3_r04_\u0641\u0627\u0631\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062a\u064a\u0628\u064a", "D3_r05_\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0639\u062f\u0648\u0646": "D3_r05_\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0639\u062f\u0648\u0646", "D3_r06_\u062c\u0631\u0627\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0648\u0632\u0627\u0646": "D3_r06_\u062c\u0631\u0627\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0648\u0632\u0627\u0646", "D3_r07_\u0645\u0647\u0646\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0627\u064a\u0631": "D3_r07_\u0645\u0647\u0646\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0627\u064a\u0631", "D3_r08_\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0636\u0644": "D3_r08_\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0636\u0644", "D3_r09_\u062c\u0646\u0627\u0646 \u0628\u0648\u0634\u0647\u0631\u064a": "D3_r09_\u062c\u0646\u0627\u0646 \u0628\u0648\u0634\u0647\u0631\u064a", "D3_r10_\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f": "D3_r10_\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f", "D3_r11_\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u064a\u0627\u0646": "D3_r11_\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u064a\u0627\u0646", "D3_r12_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0647\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0637\u064a\u0646": "D3_r12_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0647\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0637\u064a\u0646", "D3_r13_\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u062f\u0634\u062a\u064a": "D3_r13_\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u062f\u0634\u062a\u064a", "D3_r14_\u0633\u0639\u062f\u0648\u0646 \u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f": "D3_r14_\u0633\u0639\u062f\u0648\u0646 \u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f", "D3_r15_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u063a\u0636\u0646\u0641\u0631": "D3_r15_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u063a\u0636\u0646\u0641\u0631", "D3_r16_\u0645\u0627\u0636\u0649 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0645\u064a\u0633": "D3_r16_\u0645\u0627\u0636\u0649 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0645\u064a\u0633", "D3_r17_\u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0627\u0644\u064a\u0627\u0633\u064a\u0646": "D3_r17_\u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0627\u0644\u064a\u0627\u0633\u064a\u0646", "D3_r18_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0648\u0639\u0627\u0646": "D3_r18_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0648\u0639\u0627\u0646", "D3_r19_\u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0644\u0627\u0644": "D3_r19_\u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0644\u0627\u0644", "D3_r20_\u062c\u0627\u0633\u0645 \u062f\u0634\u062a\u064a": "D3_r20_\u062c\u0627\u0633\u0645 \u062f\u0634\u062a\u064a", "D3_r21_\u0633\u0647\u064a\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0627\u0644\u0645": "D3_r21_\u0633\u0647\u064a\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0627\u0644\u0645", "D3_r22_\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0621 \u0634\u0627\u0643\u0631": "D3_r22_\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0621 \u0634\u0627\u0643\u0631", "D3_r23_\u0632\u0647\u0631\u0627\u0621 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u0631\u0627\u0632\u064a": "D3_r23_\u0632\u0647\u0631\u0627\u0621 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u0631\u0627\u0632\u064a", "D3_r24_\u0641\u0627\u0637\u0645\u0629 \u0639\u0644\u064a": "D3_r24_\u0641\u0627\u0637\u0645\u0629 \u0639\u0644\u064a", "D3_r25_\u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0645\u0634\u0627\u0631\u0649": "D3_r25_\u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0645\u0634\u0627\u0631\u0649", "D3_r26_\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0645\u064a\u0645\u064a": "D3_r26_\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0645\u064a\u0645\u064a", "D3_r27_\u0646\u0648\u0631\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0631\u0648\u064a\u0634": "D3_r27_\u0646\u0648\u0631\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0631\u0648\u064a\u0634", "D3_r28_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062c\u0645\u064a": "D3_r28_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062c\u0645\u064a", "D3_r29_\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0646\u062f\u0627\u0644": "D3_r29_\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0646\u062f\u0627\u0644", "D3_r30_\u0645\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u064a\u0631\u064a": "D3_r30_\u0645\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u064a\u0631\u064a", "D3_r31_\u0647\u062f\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f\u064a": "D3_r31_\u0647\u062f\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f\u064a", "D3_r32_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0631\u064a": "D3_r32_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0631\u064a", "D4_r01_\u0634\u0639\u064a\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u064a\u0632\u0631\u0649": "D4_r01_\u0634\u0639\u064a\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u064a\u0632\u0631\u0649", "D4_r02_\u0627\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0643\u0631": "D4_r02_\u0627\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0643\u0631", "D4_r03_\u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u064a\u0631\u064a": "D4_r03_\u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u064a\u0631\u064a", "D4_r04_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0642\u064a\u0628": "D4_r04_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0642\u064a\u0628", "D4_r05_\u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0634\u0629": "D4_r05_\u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0634\u0629", "D4_r06_\u0628\u062f\u0631 \u0633\u064a\u0627\u0631": "D4_r06_\u0628\u062f\u0631 \u0633\u064a\u0627\u0631", "D4_r07_\u0633\u0639\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0646\u0641\u0648\u0631": "D4_r07_\u0633\u0639\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0646\u0641\u0648\u0631", "D4_r08_\u0641\u0627\u064a\u0632 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0645\u0647\u0648\u0631": "D4_r08_\u0641\u0627\u064a\u0632 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0645\u0647\u0648\u0631", "D4_r09_\u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u062c\u0631\u0641": "D4_r09_\u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u062c\u0631\u0641", "D4_r10_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0647\u0627\u064a\u0641": "D4_r10_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0647\u0627\u064a\u0641", "D4_r11_\u0645\u0639\u0627\u0630 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u064a\u0644\u0629": "D4_r11_\u0645\u0639\u0627\u0630 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u064a\u0644\u0629", "D4_r12_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0641\u0647\u0627\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0646\u0632\u0649": "D4_r12_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0641\u0647\u0627\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0646\u0632\u0649", "D4_r13_\u0645\u0633\u0627\u0639\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0631\u064a\u0641\u0629": "D4_r13_\u0645\u0633\u0627\u0639\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0631\u064a\u0641\u0629", "D4_r14_\u062b\u0627\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0648\u064a\u0637": "D4_r14_\u062b\u0627\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0648\u064a\u0637", "D4_r15_\u0645\u062a\u0639\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062b\u0639\u0627\u0646": "D4_r15_\u0645\u062a\u0639\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062b\u0639\u0627\u0646", "D4_r16_\u0639\u0633\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0646\u0632\u064a": "D4_r16_\u0639\u0633\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0646\u0632\u064a", "D4_r17_\u0641\u0648\u0627\u0632 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u062f\u0639\u064a": "D4_r17_\u0641\u0648\u0627\u0632 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u062f\u0639\u064a", "D4_r18_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0641\u062c\u064a": "D4_r18_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0641\u062c\u064a", "D4_r19_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0631\u0628\u064a": "D4_r19_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0631\u0628\u064a", "D4_r20_\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629": "D4_r20_\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629", "D4_r21_\u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0630\u0627\u0644\u064a": "D4_r21_\u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0630\u0627\u0644\u064a", "D4_r22_\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u0627\u062c": "D4_r22_\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u0627\u062c", "D4_r23_\u0641\u0647\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u064a\u0632\u0631\u064a": "D4_r23_\u0641\u0647\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u064a\u0632\u0631\u064a", "D4_r24_\u0646\u0648\u0627\u0641 \u0636\u062d\u0648\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u064a\u0631\u064a": "D4_r24_\u0646\u0648\u0627\u0641 \u0636\u062d\u0648\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u064a\u0631\u064a", "D4_r25_\u0641\u0648\u0627\u0632 \u0627\u0644\u0638\u0641\u064a\u0631\u064a": "D4_r25_\u0641\u0648\u0627\u0632 \u0627\u0644\u0638\u0641\u064a\u0631\u064a", "D4_r26_\u062b\u0627\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0644\u064a": "D4_r26_\u062b\u0627\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0644\u064a", "D4_r27_\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0643\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646\u064a": "D4_r27_\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0643\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646\u064a", "D4_r28_\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0634\u0627\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u064a\u0631\u064a": "D4_r28_\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0634\u0627\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u064a\u0631\u064a", "D4_r29_\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0632\u0645\u064a": "D4_r29_\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0632\u0645\u064a", "D4_r30_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646\u064a": "D4_r30_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646\u064a", "D4_r31_\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0639\u0627\u0646": "D4_r31_\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0639\u0627\u0646", "D4_r32_\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0643\u0645\u0627\u0644": "D4_r32_\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0643\u0645\u0627\u0644", "D4_r33_\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062c\u062f\u064a": "D4_r33_\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062c\u062f\u064a", "D4_r34_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u0634\u0643\u0646\u0627\u0646\u064a": "D4_r34_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u0634\u0643\u0646\u0627\u0646\u064a", "D4_r35_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u062c\u062f\u0649": "D4_r35_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u062c\u062f\u0649", "D4_r36_\u0646\u0648\u0627\u0644 \u0627\u0628\u0627\u0627\u0644\u062e\u064a\u0644": "D4_r36_\u0646\u0648\u0627\u0644 \u0627\u0628\u0627\u0627\u0644\u062e\u064a\u0644", "D4_r37_\u0641\u0647\u064a\u0645\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u064a\u062f\u064a": "D4_r37_\u0641\u0647\u064a\u0645\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u064a\u062f\u064a", "D4_r38_\u0641\u064a\u0635\u0644 \u0643\u0631\u0645": "D4_r38_\u0641\u064a\u0635\u0644 \u0643\u0631\u0645", "D4_r39_\u0628\u062f\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062c\u0627\u0648\u0628": "D4_r39_\u0628\u062f\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062c\u0627\u0648\u0628", "D4_r40_\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u064a\u0631\u0641\u064a": "D4_r40_\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u064a\u0631\u0641\u064a", "D4_r41_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0648\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0645\u0631\u064a": "D4_r41_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0648\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0645\u0631\u064a", "D4_r42_\u064a\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628 \u062c\u0648\u0647\u0631": "D4_r42_\u064a\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628 \u062c\u0648\u0647\u0631", "D4_r43_\u0641\u0648\u0627\u0632 \u0639\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0628\u0644\u0647": "D4_r43_\u0641\u0648\u0627\u0632 \u0639\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0628\u0644\u0647", "D4_r44_\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0628\u0627\u062f\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u064a\u062f\u064a": "D4_r44_\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0628\u0627\u062f\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u064a\u062f\u064a", "D4_r45_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0644\u064a\u0644\u064a": "D4_r45_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0644\u064a\u0644\u064a", "D4_r46_\u0633\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u0637\u0646\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0645\u0631\u0649": "D4_r46_\u0633\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u0637\u0646\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0645\u0631\u0649", "D4_r47_\u0645\u0637\u0644\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0646\u0632\u064a": "D4_r47_\u0645\u0637\u0644\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0646\u0632\u064a", "D4_r48_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062c\u0631\u064a": "D4_r48_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062c\u0631\u064a", "D5_r01_\u0641\u0647\u062f \u0641\u0644\u0627\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0632\u0645\u064a": "D5_r01_\u0641\u0647\u062f \u0641\u0644\u0627\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0632\u0645\u064a", "D5_r02_\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0632\u0645\u064a": "D5_r02_\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0632\u0645\u064a", "D5_r03_\u0645\u062a\u0639\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0644\u0627\u0644": "D5_r03_\u0645\u062a\u0639\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0644\u0627\u0644", "D5_r04_\u0633\u0639\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0635\u0641\u0648\u0631": "D5_r04_\u0633\u0639\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0635\u0641\u0648\u0631", "D5_r05_\u0628\u062f\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0627\u0647\u0648\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0632\u0645\u064a": "D5_r05_\u0628\u062f\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0627\u0647\u0648\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0632\u0645\u064a", "D5_r06_\u0645\u0627\u062c\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u064a\u0631\u064a": "D5_r06_\u0645\u0627\u062c\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u064a\u0631\u064a", "D5_r07_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u064a \u0646\u0627\u0635\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062c\u0645\u064a": "D5_r07_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u064a \u0646\u0627\u0635\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062c\u0645\u064a", "D5_r08_\u0647\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0634\u0645\u0633": "D5_r08_\u0647\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0634\u0645\u0633", "D5_r09_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0633\u0627\u0639\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u0633\u0631\u064a": "D5_r09_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0633\u0627\u0639\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u0633\u0631\u064a", "D5_r10_\u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0646\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062a\u064a\u0628\u064a": "D5_r10_\u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0646\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062a\u064a\u0628\u064a", "D5_r11_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0648\u064a\u0644\u0629": "D5_r11_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0648\u064a\u0644\u0629", "D5_r12_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u0651\u0627\u0646": "D5_r12_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u0651\u0627\u0646", "D5_r13_\u0639\u0627\u064a\u0636 \u0627\u0628\u0648 \u062e\u0648\u0635\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062a\u064a\u0628\u064a": "D5_r13_\u0639\u0627\u064a\u0636 \u0627\u0628\u0648 \u062e\u0648\u0635\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062a\u064a\u0628\u064a", "D5_r14_\u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0633\u0631\u064a\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062c\u0631\u0649": "D5_r14_\u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0633\u0631\u064a\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062c\u0631\u0649", "D5_r15_\u0641\u064a\u0635\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0646\u062f\u0631\u064a": "D5_r15_\u0641\u064a\u0635\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0646\u062f\u0631\u064a", "D5_r16_\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0631\u063a\u0634": "D5_r16_\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0631\u063a\u0634", "D5_r17_\u0641\u0647\u062f \u0639\u0627\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062c\u0645\u0649": "D5_r17_\u0641\u0647\u062f \u0639\u0627\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062c\u0645\u0649", "D5_r18_\u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0634\u062e\u064a\u0631": "D5_r18_\u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0634\u062e\u064a\u0631", "D5_r19_\u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0646\u064a\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u064a\u0631\u0649": "D5_r19_\u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0646\u064a\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u064a\u0631\u0649", "D5_r20_\u062c\u0627\u0628\u0631 \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0628\u064a\u0639\u064a": "D5_r20_\u062c\u0627\u0628\u0631 \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0628\u064a\u0639\u064a", "D5_r21_\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0646\u062f\u0631\u064a": "D5_r21_\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0646\u062f\u0631\u064a", "D5_r22_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0646\u062f": "D5_r22_\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0646\u062f", "D5_r23_\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062a\u064a\u0628\u064a": "D5_r23_\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062a\u064a\u0628\u064a", "D5_r24_\u0633\u0639\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062c\u0645\u064a": "D5_r24_\u0633\u0639\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062c\u0645\u064a", "D5_r25_\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0643\u0628\u0631": "D5_r25_\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0643\u0628\u0631", "D5_r26_\u0639\u0627\u064a\u0636 \u062c\u062d\u0631\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062c\u0645\u064a": "D5_r26_\u0639\u0627\u064a\u0636 \u062c\u062d\u0631\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062c\u0645\u064a", "D5_r27_\u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643 \u0641\u0647\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062c\u0631\u064a": "D5_r27_\u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643 \u0641\u0647\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062c\u0631\u064a", "D5_r28_\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0646\u0627\u0635\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062c\u0631\u0649": "D5_r28_\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0646\u0627\u0635\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062c\u0631\u0649", "D5_r29_\u0628\u0627\u062f\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u0633\u0631\u0649": "D5_r29_\u0628\u0627\u062f\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u0633\u0631\u0649", "D5_r30_\u063a\u0627\u0646\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u062c\u064a\u0644\u0627\u0646": "D5_r30_\u063a\u0627\u0646\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u062c\u064a\u0644\u0627\u0646", "D5_r31_\u0637\u0644\u0627\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0632\u0645\u064a": "D5_r31_\u0637\u0644\u0627\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0632\u0645\u064a", "D5_r32_\u0635\u0628\u0627\u062d \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649": "D5_r32_\u0635\u0628\u0627\u062d \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649", "D5_r33_\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0646": "D5_r33_\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0646", "D5_r34_\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0623\u0634\u0643\u0646\u0627\u0646\u064a": "D5_r34_\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0623\u0634\u0643\u0646\u0627\u0646\u064a", "D5_r35_\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0649": "D5_r35_\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0649", "D5_r36_\u0639\u0628\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062a\u064a\u0628\u064a": "D5_r36_\u0639\u0628\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062a\u064a\u0628\u064a", "D5_r37_\u064a\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0641\u0627\u0639\u064a": "D5_r37_\u064a\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0641\u0627\u0639\u064a", "D5_r38_\u0641\u0648\u0632\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0642\u0631": "D5_r38_\u0641\u0648\u0632\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0642\u0631", "D5_r39_\u0628\u062f\u0631 \u0641\u0627\u0636\u0644 \u0643\u0631\u0645": "D5_r39_\u0628\u062f\u0631 \u0641\u0627\u0636\u0644 \u0643\u0631\u0645", "D5_r40_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0623\u0645\u064a\u0631 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646": "D5_r40_\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0623\u0645\u064a\u0631 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:51:46.069172", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.693, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.961, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.198, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.179, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.693, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.673, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.961, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.744, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.362, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.341, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.776, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.293, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.198, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.179, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.179, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.198, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.508, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.508, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.315, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.315, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.565, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.565, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 5}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "49368c5b89984142a5dc956b5a0f3b74", "name": "Chile 2021 presidential_r2 (overnight chile_2021_presidential_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Chile", "year": 2021, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://web.archive.org/web/202112301302id_/https://www.servel.cl/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Servel_20211121_PRESIDENCIALES_SEGUNDA_VUELTA_V2_2_.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"GABRIEL_BORIC_FONT": "GABRIEL_BORIC_FONT", "JOSE_ANTONIO_KAST_RIST": "JOSE_ANTONIO_KAST_RIST", "cast_emitidos_reported": "cast_emitidos_reported"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 46888, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 46674, "cast_gt_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 46674, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:43:18.577721", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.865, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.841, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.777, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.542, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.615, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.616, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.068, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.068, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.905, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 46888}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "389d55816956413893e124ca59561d0c", "name": "Chile 2021 presidential_r1 (overnight chile_2021_r1_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Chile", "year": 2021, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://web.archive.org/web/20220915191557id_/https://www.servel.cl/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Resultados_Mesa_Presidenciales_1v_2021-1.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"GABRIEL BORIC FONT": "GABRIEL BORIC FONT", "JOSE ANTONIO KAST RIST": "JOSE ANTONIO KAST RIST", "YASNA PROVOSTE CAMPILLAY": "YASNA PROVOSTE CAMPILLAY", "SEBASTIAN SICHEL RAMIREZ": "SEBASTIAN SICHEL RAMIREZ", "EDUARDO ARTES BRICHETTI": "EDUARDO ARTES BRICHETTI", "MARCO ENRIQUEZ-OMINAMI GUMUCIO": "MARCO ENRIQUEZ-OMINAMI GUMUCIO", "FRANCO PARISI FERNANDEZ": "FRANCO PARISI FERNANDEZ"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 45710, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 283}, "n_stations_flagged": 283, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:40:29.137729", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.865, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.841, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.777, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.542, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.615, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.616, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.068, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.068, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.905, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 45710}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e2e1e64c5b294970a846cad2d3c6f4de", "name": "Chile 2017 presidential_r2 (overnight chile_2017_presidential_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Chile", "year": 2017, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.servel.cl/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Resultados_Mesa_PRESIDENCIAL_Tricel_2v.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_SEBASTIAN_PINERA_ECHENIQUE": "votes_SEBASTIAN_PINERA_ECHENIQUE", "votes_ALEJANDRO_GUILLIER_ALVAREZ": "votes_ALEJANDRO_GUILLIER_ALVAREZ"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 41842, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 624}, "n_stations_flagged": 624, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:38:13.505415", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.914, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.889, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.842, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.96, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.477, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.732, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.664, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.664, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.073, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Chile Vamos", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Nueva Mayoria", "margin": 9.14, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "CHL", "year": 2017, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 41842}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "32c0f1b6101b48f19fe8f64031e1ee4d", "name": "Poland 2015 presidential_r2 (overnight poland_2015_presidential_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 2015, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://prezydent2015.pkw.gov.pl/wyniki_tura2.zip (PKW official, wyniki_tura2.xls)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"obwod": "obwod", "Andrzej_Sebastian_Duda": "Andrzej_Sebastian_Duda", "Bronislaw_Maria_Komorowski": "Bronislaw_Maria_Komorowski"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 27817, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 27817, "cast_valid_mismatch": 628}, "n_stations_flagged": 27817, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:36:43.072802", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.904, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.961, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.876, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.775, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.961, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.826, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.602, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.335, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.876, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.786, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.074, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.074, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Law and Justice (PIS)", "winner_candidate": "A. Duda", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 3.1, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "POL", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 27817}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7b841031ea98481393839cf012ff74f8", "name": "Poland 2020 presidential_r2 (overnight poland_2020_presidential_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 2020, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://prezydent20200628.pkw.gov.pl/prezydent20200628/data/2/csv/wyniki_gl_na_kand_po_obwodach_xlsx.zip", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"DUDA": "DUDA", "TRZASKOWSKI": "TRZASKOWSKI"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 27231, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 970, "registered_not_positive": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 974, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:35:14.459819", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.788, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.939, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.616, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.45, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.788, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.697, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.667, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.369, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.592, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.461, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.766, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.616, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.45, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.45, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.53, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.53, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.572, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.572, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.125, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.125, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.68, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 27231}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b49fa85c81b049afad073895e98512f9", "name": "Madagascar 2023 presidential (overnight madagascar_2023_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Madagascar", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "http://www.hcc.gov.mg/?page_id=8629 (Haute Cour Constitutionnelle definitive results; per-district PDFs e.g. http://www.hcc.gov.mg/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/1101_2023.pdf, each with per-bureau tables)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"RAZAFINJOELINA_Tahina": "RAZAFINJOELINA_Tahina", "ANDRIANAINARIVELO_Hajo": "ANDRIANAINARIVELO_Hajo", "RAJOELINA_Andry": "RAJOELINA_Andry", "RATSIRAKA_Roland": "RATSIRAKA_Roland", "RAVALOMANANA_Marc": "RAVALOMANANA_Marc", "PARAINA_Auguste": "PARAINA_Auguste", "RAOBELINA_Andry": "RAOBELINA_Andry", "RAZAFITSIANDRAOFA_Jean_Brunelle": "RAZAFITSIANDRAOFA_Jean_Brunelle", "RATSIRAHONANA_Lalaina": "RATSIRAHONANA_Lalaina", "RAJAONARIMAMPIANINA_Hery": "RAJAONARIMAMPIANINA_Hery", "RADERANIRINA_Sendrison": "RADERANIRINA_Sendrison", "RATSIETISON_Jean_Jacques": "RATSIETISON_Jean_Jacques", "RANDRIANASOLONIAIKO_Siteny": "RANDRIANASOLONIAIKO_Siteny"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 25101, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 49}, "n_stations_flagged": 49, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:33:47.655014", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.139, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 0.98, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.461, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.225, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.139, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.285, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 0.98, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.245, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.253, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.427, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.357, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.169, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.344, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.336, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.461, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.461, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.225, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.225, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.705, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.705, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.244, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.244, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.658, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 25101}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1f5c3e1622004caa839ec539865ce9aa", "name": "Romania 2024 parliamentary (overnight romania_2024_senate.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Romania", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://prezenta.roaep.ro/parlamentare01122024/data/json/sicpv/pv/pv_{cc}.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"UNIUNEA DEMOCRAT\u0102 MAGHIAR\u0102 DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA DEMOCRAT\u0102 MAGHIAR\u0102 DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "PARTIDUL NA\u021aIONAL LIBERAL": "PARTIDUL NA\u021aIONAL LIBERAL", "FOR\u021aA DREPTEI": "FOR\u021aA DREPTEI", "ALIAN\u021aA PENTRU UNIREA ROM\u00c2NILOR": "ALIAN\u021aA PENTRU UNIREA ROM\u00c2NILOR", "UNIUNEA SALVA\u021aI ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA SALVA\u021aI ROM\u00c2NIA", "PARTIDUL SOCIAL DEMOCRAT": "PARTIDUL SOCIAL DEMOCRAT", "PARTIDUL OAMENILOR TINERI": "PARTIDUL OAMENILOR TINERI", "RE\u00ceNNOIM PROIECTUL EUROPEAN AL ROM\u00c2NIEI": "RE\u00ceNNOIM PROIECTUL EUROPEAN AL ROM\u00c2NIEI", "PARTIDUL NOUA ROM\u00c2NIE": "PARTIDUL NOUA ROM\u00c2NIE", "PARTIDUL S_O_S_ ROM\u00c2NIA": "PARTIDUL S_O_S_ ROM\u00c2NIA", "PATRIO\u021aII POPORULUI ROM\u00c2N": "PATRIO\u021aII POPORULUI ROM\u00c2N", "PARTIDUL PHRALIPE AL ROMILOR": "PARTIDUL PHRALIPE AL ROMILOR", "PARTIDUL NA\u021aIONAL CONSERVATOR ROM\u00c2N": "PARTIDUL NA\u021aIONAL CONSERVATOR ROM\u00c2N", "PARTIDUL ECOLOGIST ROM\u00c2N": "PARTIDUL ECOLOGIST ROM\u00c2N", "PARTIDUL ROM\u00c2NIA \u00ceN AC\u021aIUNE": "PARTIDUL ROM\u00c2NIA \u00ceN AC\u021aIUNE", "PARTIDUL REPUBLICAN DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "PARTIDUL REPUBLICAN DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "ALTERNATIVA PENTRU DEMNITATE NA\u021aIONAL\u0102": "ALTERNATIVA PENTRU DEMNITATE NA\u021aIONAL\u0102", "PARTIDUL SOCIAL DEMOCRAT UNIT": "PARTIDUL SOCIAL DEMOCRAT UNIT", "DREPTATE \u0218I RESPECT \u00ceN EUROPA PENTRU TO\u021aI": "DREPTATE \u0218I RESPECT \u00ceN EUROPA PENTRU TO\u021aI", "PARTIDUL SOCIAL DEMOCRAT INDEPENDENT": "PARTIDUL SOCIAL DEMOCRAT INDEPENDENT", "S\u0102N\u0102TATE EDUCA\u0162IE NATUR\u0102 SUSTENABILITATE": "S\u0102N\u0102TATE EDUCA\u0162IE NATUR\u0102 SUSTENABILITATE", "LIGA AC\u021aIUNII NA\u021aIONALE": "LIGA AC\u021aIUNII NA\u021aIONALE", "ALIAN\u021aA NA\u021aIONAL CRE\u0218TIN\u0102": "ALIAN\u021aA NA\u021aIONAL CRE\u0218TIN\u0102", "ROM\u00c2NIA SOCIALIST\u0102": "ROM\u00c2NIA SOCIALIST\u0102", "PARTIDUL DREPT\u0102\u021aII": "PARTIDUL DREPT\u0102\u021aII", "PARTIDUL UNIUNEA GETO-DACILOR": "PARTIDUL UNIUNEA GETO-DACILOR", "PARTIDUL PATRIA": "PARTIDUL PATRIA", "DANIEL CIOBBANU": "DANIEL CIOBBANU", "PARTIDUL VERDE": "PARTIDUL VERDE", "PARTIDUL OAMENILOR CREDINCIO\u0218I": "PARTIDUL OAMENILOR CREDINCIO\u0218I", "PARTIDUL NA\u021aIONAL \u021a\u0102R\u0102NESC CRE\u0218TIN DEMOCRAT": "PARTIDUL NA\u021aIONAL \u021a\u0102R\u0102NESC CRE\u0218TIN DEMOCRAT", "IOAN-MIHAI B\u0102CANU": "IOAN-MIHAI B\u0102CANU", "CIPRIAN-GHEORGHE ST\u0102TESCU": "CIPRIAN-GHEORGHE ST\u0102TESCU", "IULIAN LUNGU": "IULIAN LUNGU", "IOAN-AUREL STANCU": "IOAN-AUREL STANCU", "CONSTANTIN-MIRCEA STOICA": "CONSTANTIN-MIRCEA STOICA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19918, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 14128}, "n_stations_flagged": 14128, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:32:38.215960", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.442, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.344, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.628, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.449, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.442, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.611, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.344, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.586, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.505, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.376, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.628, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.449, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.442, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.389, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.389, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 19918}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0a358f7833444e9b9fa0d21f92d5af11", "name": "Romania 2024 parliamentary (overnight romania_2024_chamber_deputies.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Romania", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://prezenta.roaep.ro/parlamentare01122024/data/json/sicpv/pv/pv_{cc}.json", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"UNIUNEA DEMOCRAT\u0102 MAGHIAR\u0102 DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA DEMOCRAT\u0102 MAGHIAR\u0102 DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "PARTIDUL NA\u021aIONAL LIBERAL": "PARTIDUL NA\u021aIONAL LIBERAL", "FOR\u021aA DREPTEI": "FOR\u021aA DREPTEI", "ALIAN\u021aA PENTRU UNIREA ROM\u00c2NILOR": "ALIAN\u021aA PENTRU UNIREA ROM\u00c2NILOR", "UNIUNEA SALVA\u021aI ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA SALVA\u021aI ROM\u00c2NIA", "PARTIDUL SOCIAL DEMOCRAT": "PARTIDUL SOCIAL DEMOCRAT", "PARTIDUL OAMENILOR TINERI": "PARTIDUL OAMENILOR TINERI", "RE\u00ceNNOIM PROIECTUL EUROPEAN AL ROM\u00c2NIEI": "RE\u00ceNNOIM PROIECTUL EUROPEAN AL ROM\u00c2NIEI", "PARTIDUL NOUA ROM\u00c2NIE": "PARTIDUL NOUA ROM\u00c2NIE", "PARTIDUL S_O_S_ ROM\u00c2NIA": "PARTIDUL S_O_S_ ROM\u00c2NIA", "ALIAN\u021aA NA\u021aIONAL CRE\u0218TIN\u0102": "ALIAN\u021aA NA\u021aIONAL CRE\u0218TIN\u0102", "PATRIO\u021aII POPORULUI ROM\u00c2N": "PATRIO\u021aII POPORULUI ROM\u00c2N", "PARTIDUL NA\u021aIONAL CONSERVATOR ROM\u00c2N": "PARTIDUL NA\u021aIONAL CONSERVATOR ROM\u00c2N", "PARTIDUL ECOLOGIST ROM\u00c2N": "PARTIDUL ECOLOGIST ROM\u00c2N", "PARTIDUL ROM\u00c2NIA \u00ceN AC\u021aIUNE": "PARTIDUL ROM\u00c2NIA \u00ceN AC\u021aIUNE", "PARTIDUL REPUBLICAN DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "PARTIDUL REPUBLICAN DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "ALTERNATIVA PENTRU DEMNITATE NA\u021aIONAL\u0102": "ALTERNATIVA PENTRU DEMNITATE NA\u021aIONAL\u0102", "S\u0102N\u0102TATE EDUCA\u0162IE NATUR\u0102 SUSTENABILITATE": "S\u0102N\u0102TATE EDUCA\u0162IE NATUR\u0102 SUSTENABILITATE", "PARTIDUL SOCIAL DEMOCRAT UNIT": "PARTIDUL SOCIAL DEMOCRAT UNIT", "DREPTATE \u0218I RESPECT \u00ceN EUROPA PENTRU TO\u021aI": "DREPTATE \u0218I RESPECT \u00ceN EUROPA PENTRU TO\u021aI", "PARTIDUL SOCIAL DEMOCRAT INDEPENDENT": "PARTIDUL SOCIAL DEMOCRAT INDEPENDENT", "UNIUNEA ELEN\u0102 DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA ELEN\u0102 DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "UNIUNEA DEMOCRAT\u0102 A T\u0102TARILOR TURCO-MUSULMANI DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA DEMOCRAT\u0102 A T\u0102TARILOR TURCO-MUSULMANI DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "ASOCIA\u021aIA \"LIGA ALBANEZILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA\"": "ASOCIA\u021aIA \"LIGA ALBANEZILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA\"", "UNIUNEA CROA\u021aILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA CROA\u021aILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "UNIUNEA POLONEZILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA POLONEZILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "UNIUNEA CULTURAL\u0102 A RUTENILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA CULTURAL\u0102 A RUTENILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "UNIUNEA BULGAR\u0102 DIN BANAT- ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA BULGAR\u0102 DIN BANAT- ROM\u00c2NIA", "FEDERA\u021aIA COMUNIT\u0102\u021aILOR EVREIE\u0218TI DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "FEDERA\u021aIA COMUNIT\u0102\u021aILOR EVREIE\u0218TI DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "UNIUNEA UCRAINENILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA UCRAINENILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "FORUMUL DEMOCRAT AL GERMANILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "FORUMUL DEMOCRAT AL GERMANILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "ASOCIA\u021aIA MACEDONENILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "ASOCIA\u021aIA MACEDONENILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "UNIUNEA ARMENILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA ARMENILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "ASOCIA\u021aIA PARTIDA ROMILOR \"PRO-EUROPA\"": "ASOCIA\u021aIA PARTIDA ROMILOR \"PRO-EUROPA\"", "ASOCIA\u021aIA ITALIENILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA \u2013 RO_AS_IT_": "ASOCIA\u021aIA ITALIENILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA \u2013 RO_AS_IT_", "UNIUNEA DEMOCRAT\u0102 TURC\u0102 DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA DEMOCRAT\u0102 TURC\u0102 DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "UNIUNEA DEMOCRATIC\u0102 A SLOVACILOR \u0218I CEHILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA DEMOCRATIC\u0102 A SLOVACILOR \u0218I CEHILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "COMUNITATEA RU\u0218ILOR LIPOVENI DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "COMUNITATEA RU\u0218ILOR LIPOVENI DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "UNIUNEA S\u00c2RBILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA S\u00c2RBILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "FORUMUL CEHILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "FORUMUL CEHILOR DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "LIGA AC\u021aIUNII NA\u021aIONALE": "LIGA AC\u021aIUNII NA\u021aIONALE", "ROM\u00c2NIA SOCIALIST\u0102": "ROM\u00c2NIA SOCIALIST\u0102", "PARTIDUL DREPT\u0102\u021aII": "PARTIDUL DREPT\u0102\u021aII", "GEANINA-ELENA HAGIM\u0102": "GEANINA-ELENA HAGIM\u0102", "JOHN-ION BANU-MUSCEL": "JOHN-ION BANU-MUSCEL", "PARTIDUL UNIUNEA GETO-DACILOR": "PARTIDUL UNIUNEA GETO-DACILOR", "PARTIDUL PATRIA": "PARTIDUL PATRIA", "GEORGE-BOGDAN STOIAN": "GEORGE-BOGDAN STOIAN", "OANA-MIHAELA SECAR\u0102": "OANA-MIHAELA SECAR\u0102", "DORIN CURTEAN": "DORIN CURTEAN", "J\u00c1NOS-ATTILA SZ\u0170CS": "J\u00c1NOS-ATTILA SZ\u0170CS", "GHEORGHE-DAMIAN BACIU": "GHEORGHE-DAMIAN BACIU", "PARTIDUL VERDE": "PARTIDUL VERDE", "LAURA-MIRELA IUSEIN": "LAURA-MIRELA IUSEIN", "MATEI-ALEXANDRU NEGOI\u021a\u0102": "MATEI-ALEXANDRU NEGOI\u021a\u0102", "MIRCEA ION": "MIRCEA ION", "VASILE IANCU": "VASILE IANCU", "MIHAI TOADER": "MIHAI TOADER", "GEAPON KARANI": "GEAPON KARANI", "IOAN-SABIN S\u0102RMA\u0218": "IOAN-SABIN S\u0102RMA\u0218", "ROMEO BO\u0218NEAGU": "ROMEO BO\u0218NEAGU", "MIHAI-SORIN T\u00ceRNOVEANU": "MIHAI-SORIN T\u00ceRNOVEANU", "ILIE CIOBANU": "ILIE CIOBANU", "PARTIDUL OAMENILOR CREDINCIO\u0218I": "PARTIDUL OAMENILOR CREDINCIO\u0218I", "AURELIAN-LEONARD DAN": "AURELIAN-LEONARD DAN", "RINGO D\u0102MUREANU": "RINGO D\u0102MUREANU", "VASILE \u0218TEFAN": "VASILE \u0218TEFAN", "ADRIAN FANACA": "ADRIAN FANACA", "D\u0102NU\u021a RUSU": "D\u0102NU\u021a RUSU", "PARTIDUL NA\u021aIONAL \u021a\u0102R\u0102NESC CRE\u0218TIN DEMOCRAT": "PARTIDUL NA\u021aIONAL \u021a\u0102R\u0102NESC CRE\u0218TIN DEMOCRAT", "STAN DUMITRIC\u0102": "STAN DUMITRIC\u0102", "COSMIN-ALIN OL\u0102RA\u0218U": "COSMIN-ALIN OL\u0102RA\u0218U", "MARINIC\u0102 CAZACU": "MARINIC\u0102 CAZACU", "OVIDIU MOLDOVANU": "OVIDIU MOLDOVANU", "CIPRIAN-VASILE STEGARU": "CIPRIAN-VASILE STEGARU", "\u0218TEFAN-LUCIAN BURLEA": "\u0218TEFAN-LUCIAN BURLEA", "PARTIDUL PENSIONARILOR UNI\u021aI": "PARTIDUL PENSIONARILOR UNI\u021aI", "GHEORGHE-SORINEL VOINEA": "GHEORGHE-SORINEL VOINEA", "VASILE VLA\u0218IN": "VASILE VLA\u0218IN", "MIRCEA CIR\u021a": "MIRCEA CIR\u021a", "FLORIN-ION M\u0102NEANU": "FLORIN-ION M\u0102NEANU", "DUMITREL-VICTOR TI\u021aA": "DUMITREL-VICTOR TI\u021aA", "MARIN RENGHEA": "MARIN RENGHEA", "ROBERTO DAN": "ROBERTO DAN", "EUGEN-EDUARD DAVID": "EUGEN-EDUARD DAVID", "DUMITRU BOGDAN": "DUMITRU BOGDAN", "OVIDIUS-DRAGO\u0218 DINULESCU": "OVIDIUS-DRAGO\u0218 DINULESCU", "ANDREI-IONU\u021a NE\u0218CULESCU": "ANDREI-IONU\u021a NE\u0218CULESCU", "DANIEL BODNAR": "DANIEL BODNAR", "TOM-C\u0102T\u0102LIN DR\u0102GAN": "TOM-C\u0102T\u0102LIN DR\u0102GAN", "NELU BALA\u0218": "NELU BALA\u0218", "IONEL-MARCEL ABRUDAN": "IONEL-MARCEL ABRUDAN", "ERICH-EDUARD MOCANU GOLLENT": "ERICH-EDUARD MOCANU GOLLENT", "VALENTIN SPIRU": "VALENTIN SPIRU", "SILVIAN-ANDREI SPIRIDON": "SILVIAN-ANDREI SPIRIDON", "FLORIN-M\u0102D\u0102LIN LISARU": "FLORIN-M\u0102D\u0102LIN LISARU", "\u0218TEFAN-ALEXANDRU STANCU": "\u0218TEFAN-ALEXANDRU STANCU", "VIRGIL P\u00ceRVULESCU": "VIRGIL P\u00ceRVULESCU", "VASILE AGA": "VASILE AGA", "FLORIN ANDREICU\u021a": "FLORIN ANDREICU\u021a", "CLAUDIA PUIU-BARRAUD": "CLAUDIA PUIU-BARRAUD"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19918, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 13690}, "n_stations_flagged": 13690, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:31:25.500707", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.442, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.344, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.628, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.449, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.442, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.611, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.344, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.586, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.505, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.376, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.628, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.449, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.442, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.389, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.389, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 19918}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6ce684f4ac2f460588326fae83e962b9", "name": "Bulgaria 2024 parliamentary (overnight bulgaria_2024jun_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bulgaria", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.cik.bg/europe2024/opendata/spreadsheet.zip (CIK official open data; the 9-June-2024 combined portal \u2014 zip holds ep.xlsx for the European Parliament race PLUS ns01-ns32.xlsx, one per MIR/multi-member district, for the National Assembly race used here. Fetched live with browser UA; liv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"none_of_above": "none_of_above", "\u0411\u041d\u041e": "\u0411\u041d\u041e", "\u0411\u0421\u0414\u0414 \u2013 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0421\u041a\u0418 \u0421\u042a\u042e\u0417 \u0417\u0410 \u0414\u0418\u0420\u0415\u041a\u0422\u041d\u0410 \u0414\u0415\u041c\u041e\u041a\u0420\u0410\u0426\u0418\u042f": "\u0411\u0421\u0414\u0414 \u2013 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0421\u041a\u0418 \u0421\u042a\u042e\u0417 \u0417\u0410 \u0414\u0418\u0420\u0415\u041a\u0422\u041d\u0410 \u0414\u0415\u041c\u041e\u041a\u0420\u0410\u0426\u0418\u042f", "\u0411\u0421\u041f \u0437\u0430 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f": "\u0411\u0421\u041f \u0437\u0430 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f", "\u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0421\u041a\u0418 \u0412\u042a\u0417\u0425\u041e\u0414": "\u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0421\u041a\u0418 \u0412\u042a\u0417\u0425\u041e\u0414", "\u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0421\u041a\u0418 \u041d\u0410\u0426\u0418\u041e\u041d\u0410\u041b\u0415\u041d \u0421\u042a\u042e\u0417 \u2013 \u041d\u0414": "\u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0421\u041a\u0418 \u041d\u0410\u0426\u0418\u041e\u041d\u0410\u041b\u0415\u041d \u0421\u042a\u042e\u0417 \u2013 \u041d\u0414", "\u0412\u042a\u0417\u0420\u0410\u0416\u0414\u0410\u041d\u0415": "\u0412\u042a\u0417\u0420\u0410\u0416\u0414\u0410\u041d\u0415", "\u0413\u0415\u0420\u0411-\u0421\u0414\u0421": "\u0413\u0415\u0420\u0411-\u0421\u0414\u0421", "\u0414\u0432\u0438\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0437\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430 \u0438 \u0441\u0432\u043e\u0431\u043e\u0434\u0438 \u2013 \u0414\u041f\u0421": "\u0414\u0432\u0438\u0436\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u0437\u0430 \u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430 \u0438 \u0441\u0432\u043e\u0431\u043e\u0434\u0438 \u2013 \u0414\u041f\u0421", "\u0415\u0414\u0418\u041d\u0415\u041d\u0418\u0415": "\u0415\u0414\u0418\u041d\u0415\u041d\u0418\u0415", "\u0417\u0410 \u0412\u0415\u041b\u0418\u041a\u0410 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f": "\u0417\u0410 \u0412\u0415\u041b\u0418\u041a\u0410 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f", "\u0417\u0415\u041b\u0415\u041d\u041e \u0414\u0412\u0418\u0416\u0415\u041d\u0418\u0415": "\u0417\u0415\u041b\u0415\u041d\u041e \u0414\u0412\u0418\u0416\u0415\u041d\u0418\u0415", "\u041a\u041e\u0410\u041b\u0418\u0426\u0418\u042f \u041d\u0410 \u0420\u041e\u0417\u0410\u0422\u0410": "\u041a\u041e\u0410\u041b\u0418\u0426\u0418\u042f \u041d\u0410 \u0420\u041e\u0417\u0410\u0422\u0410", "\u041a\u041e\u0410\u041b\u0418\u0426\u0418\u042f \u041d\u0415\u0423\u0422\u0420\u0410\u041b\u041d\u0410 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f (\u0420\u0423\u0421\u041e\u0424\u0418\u041b\u0418 \u0418 \u041a\u041e\u041c\u0423\u041d\u0418\u0421\u0422\u0418)": "\u041a\u041e\u0410\u041b\u0418\u0426\u0418\u042f \u041d\u0415\u0423\u0422\u0420\u0410\u041b\u041d\u0410 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f (\u0420\u0423\u0421\u041e\u0424\u0418\u041b\u0418 \u0418 \u041a\u041e\u041c\u0423\u041d\u0418\u0421\u0422\u0418)", "\u041a\u041e\u0410\u041b\u0418\u0426\u0418\u042f \u041f\u0420\u041e\u0414\u042a\u041b\u0416\u0410\u0412\u0410\u041c\u0415 \u041f\u0420\u041e\u041c\u042f\u041d\u0410\u0422\u0410 \u2013 \u0414\u0415\u041c\u041e\u041a\u0420\u0410\u0422\u0418\u0427\u041d\u0410 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f": "\u041a\u041e\u0410\u041b\u0418\u0426\u0418\u042f \u041f\u0420\u041e\u0414\u042a\u041b\u0416\u0410\u0412\u0410\u041c\u0415 \u041f\u0420\u041e\u041c\u042f\u041d\u0410\u0422\u0410 \u2013 \u0414\u0415\u041c\u041e\u041a\u0420\u0410\u0422\u0418\u0427\u041d\u0410 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f", "\u041a\u041f \u0413\u0420\u0410\u0416\u0414\u0410\u041d\u0421\u041a\u0418 \u0411\u041b\u041e\u041a (\u0413\u0411)": "\u041a\u041f \u0413\u0420\u0410\u0416\u0414\u0410\u041d\u0421\u041a\u0418 \u0411\u041b\u041e\u041a (\u0413\u0411)", "\u041b\u0415\u0412\u0418\u0426\u0410\u0422\u0410!": "\u041b\u0415\u0412\u0418\u0426\u0410\u0422\u0410!", "\u041d\u0418\u0415 \u0413\u0420\u0410\u0416\u0414\u0410\u041d\u0418\u0422\u0415 /\u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0421\u041a\u0410\u0422\u0410 \u041f\u0420\u041e\u041b\u0415\u0422, \u041a\u041e\u0419, \u0411\u0420\u0421\u041f, \u041d\u0410\u0426\u0418\u042f/": "\u041d\u0418\u0415 \u0413\u0420\u0410\u0416\u0414\u0410\u041d\u0418\u0422\u0415 /\u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0421\u041a\u0410\u0422\u0410 \u041f\u0420\u041e\u041b\u0415\u0422, \u041a\u041e\u0419, \u0411\u0420\u0421\u041f, \u041d\u0410\u0426\u0418\u042f/", "\u041d\u0418\u0415 \u0418\u0414\u0412\u0410\u041c\u0415": "\u041d\u0418\u0415 \u0418\u0414\u0412\u0410\u041c\u0415", "\u041f\u041e\u041b\u0418\u0422\u0418\u0427\u0415\u0421\u041a\u0410 \u041f\u0410\u0420\u0422\u0418\u042f \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0421\u041a\u0418 \u0413\u041b\u0410\u0421\u042a": "\u041f\u041e\u041b\u0418\u0422\u0418\u0427\u0415\u0421\u041a\u0410 \u041f\u0410\u0420\u0422\u0418\u042f \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0421\u041a\u0418 \u0413\u041b\u0410\u0421\u042a", "\u041f\u041f \u0412\u0415\u041b\u0418\u0427\u0418\u0415": "\u041f\u041f \u0412\u0415\u041b\u0418\u0427\u0418\u0415", "\u041f\u041f \u0412\u041c\u0420\u041e \u2013 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0421\u041a\u041e \u041d\u0410\u0426\u0418\u041e\u041d\u0410\u041b\u041d\u041e \u0414\u0412\u0418\u0416\u0415\u041d\u0418\u0415": "\u041f\u041f \u0412\u041c\u0420\u041e \u2013 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0421\u041a\u041e \u041d\u0410\u0426\u0418\u041e\u041d\u0410\u041b\u041d\u041e \u0414\u0412\u0418\u0416\u0415\u041d\u0418\u0415", "\u041f\u041f \u0413\u041b\u0410\u0421 \u041d\u0410\u0420\u041e\u0414\u0415\u041d": "\u041f\u041f \u0413\u041b\u0410\u0421 \u041d\u0410\u0420\u041e\u0414\u0415\u041d", "\u041f\u041f \u0418\u041c\u0410 \u0422\u0410\u041a\u042a\u0412 \u041d\u0410\u0420\u041e\u0414": "\u041f\u041f \u0418\u041c\u0410 \u0422\u0410\u041a\u042a\u0412 \u041d\u0410\u0420\u041e\u0414", "\u041f\u041f \u041c\u0415\u0427": "\u041f\u041f \u041c\u0415\u0427", "\u041f\u041f \u041d\u0410\u0420\u041e\u0414\u041d\u0410 \u041f\u0410\u0420\u0422\u0418\u042f \u0418\u0421\u0422\u0418\u041d\u0410\u0422\u0410 \u0418 \u0421\u0410\u041c\u041e \u0418\u0421\u0422\u0418\u041d\u0410\u0422\u0410": "\u041f\u041f \u041d\u0410\u0420\u041e\u0414\u041d\u0410 \u041f\u0410\u0420\u0422\u0418\u042f \u0418\u0421\u0422\u0418\u041d\u0410\u0422\u0410 \u0418 \u0421\u0410\u041c\u041e \u0418\u0421\u0422\u0418\u041d\u0410\u0422\u0410", "\u041f\u041f \u041e\u0411\u0429\u0415\u0421\u0422\u0412\u041e \u0417\u0410 \u041d\u041e\u0412\u0410 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f": "\u041f\u041f \u041e\u0411\u0429\u0415\u0421\u0422\u0412\u041e \u0417\u0410 \u041d\u041e\u0412\u0410 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f", "\u041f\u0420\u042f\u041a\u0410 \u0414\u0415\u041c\u041e\u041a\u0420\u0410\u0426\u0418\u042f": "\u041f\u0420\u042f\u041a\u0410 \u0414\u0415\u041c\u041e\u041a\u0420\u0410\u0426\u0418\u042f", "\u041f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u044f \u043d\u0430 \u0417\u0415\u041b\u0415\u041d\u0418\u0422\u0415": "\u041f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u044f \u043d\u0430 \u0417\u0415\u041b\u0415\u041d\u0418\u0422\u0415", "\u0421\u0418\u041d\u042f \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f": "\u0421\u0418\u041d\u042f \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f", "\u0421\u041e\u041b\u0418\u0414\u0410\u0420\u041d\u0410 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f": "\u0421\u041e\u041b\u0418\u0414\u0410\u0420\u041d\u0410 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f", "\u0426\u0415\u041d\u0422\u042a\u0420": "\u0426\u0415\u041d\u0422\u042a\u0420"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12976, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 10901, "cast_gt_registered": 1, "cast_valid_mismatch": 10911}, "n_stations_flagged": 10916, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:30:36.258943", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.29, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.418, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.645, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.533, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.29, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.391, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.348, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.484, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.533, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.533, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.482, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.482, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 12976}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9c8b141f6b224fec981c5df5eb06a0d6", "name": "Bulgaria 2024 parliamentary (overnight bulgaria_2024oct_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bulgaria", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.cik.bg/pe202410/opendata/spreadsheet.zip (CIK official open data; fetched via Wayback raw web/20241106163848id_/)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u0410\u041b\u0418\u0410\u041d\u0421 \u0417\u0410 \u041f\u0420\u0410\u0412\u0410 \u0418 \u0421\u0412\u041e\u0411\u041e\u0414\u0418 \u2013 \u0410\u041f\u0421": "\u0410\u041b\u0418\u0410\u041d\u0421 \u0417\u0410 \u041f\u0420\u0410\u0412\u0410 \u0418 \u0421\u0412\u041e\u0411\u041e\u0414\u0418 \u2013 \u0410\u041f\u0421", "\u0410\u0422\u0410\u041a\u0410": "\u0410\u0422\u0410\u041a\u0410", "\u0411\u0420\u0418\u0413\u0410\u0414\u0410": "\u0411\u0420\u0418\u0413\u0410\u0414\u0410", "\u0411\u0421\u0414\u0414 \u2013 \u0414\u0418\u0420\u0415\u041a\u0422\u041d\u0410 \u0414\u0415\u041c\u041e\u041a\u0420\u0410\u0426\u0418\u042f": "\u0411\u0421\u0414\u0414 \u2013 \u0414\u0418\u0420\u0415\u041a\u0422\u041d\u0410 \u0414\u0415\u041c\u041e\u041a\u0420\u0410\u0426\u0418\u042f", "\u0411\u0421\u041f \u2013 \u041e\u0411\u0415\u0414\u0418\u041d\u0415\u041d\u0410 \u041b\u0415\u0412\u0418\u0426\u0410": "\u0411\u0421\u041f \u2013 \u041e\u0411\u0415\u0414\u0418\u041d\u0415\u041d\u0410 \u041b\u0415\u0412\u0418\u0426\u0410", "\u0411\u0422\u0420 \u2013 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f \u041d\u0410 \u0422\u0420\u0423\u0414\u0410 \u0418 \u0420\u0410\u0417\u0423\u041c\u0410": "\u0411\u0422\u0420 \u2013 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f \u041d\u0410 \u0422\u0420\u0423\u0414\u0410 \u0418 \u0420\u0410\u0417\u0423\u041c\u0410", "\u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0421\u041a\u0418 \u0412\u042a\u0417\u0425\u041e\u0414": "\u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0421\u041a\u0418 \u0412\u042a\u0417\u0425\u041e\u0414", "\u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0421\u041a\u0418 \u041d\u0410\u0426\u0418\u041e\u041d\u0410\u041b\u0415\u041d \u0421\u042a\u042e\u0417 \u2013 \u041d\u0414": "\u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0421\u041a\u0418 \u041d\u0410\u0426\u0418\u041e\u041d\u0410\u041b\u0415\u041d \u0421\u042a\u042e\u0417 \u2013 \u041d\u0414", "\u0411\u0443\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0438": "\u0411\u0443\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0438", "\u0412\u042a\u0417\u0420\u0410\u0416\u0414\u0410\u041d\u0415": "\u0412\u042a\u0417\u0420\u0410\u0416\u0414\u0410\u041d\u0415", "\u0413\u0415\u0420\u0411-\u0421\u0414\u0421": "\u0413\u0415\u0420\u0411-\u0421\u0414\u0421", "\u0414\u041f\u0421-\u041d\u043e\u0432\u043e \u043d\u0430\u0447\u0430\u043b\u043e": "\u0414\u041f\u0421-\u041d\u043e\u0432\u043e \u043d\u0430\u0447\u0430\u043b\u043e", "\u041a\u041e\u0410\u041b\u0418\u0426\u0418\u042f \u041f\u0420\u041e\u0414\u042a\u041b\u0416\u0410\u0412\u0410\u041c\u0415 \u041f\u0420\u041e\u041c\u042f\u041d\u0410\u0422\u0410 \u2013 \u0414\u0415\u041c\u041e\u041a\u0420\u0410\u0422\u0418\u0427\u041d\u0410 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f": "\u041a\u041e\u0410\u041b\u0418\u0426\u0418\u042f \u041f\u0420\u041e\u0414\u042a\u041b\u0416\u0410\u0412\u0410\u041c\u0415 \u041f\u0420\u041e\u041c\u042f\u041d\u0410\u0422\u0410 \u2013 \u0414\u0415\u041c\u041e\u041a\u0420\u0410\u0422\u0418\u0427\u041d\u0410 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f", "\u041a\u041e\u0419": "\u041a\u041e\u0419", "\u041a\u041f \u0420\u0423\u0421\u041e\u0424\u0418\u041b\u0418 \u0417\u0410 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f": "\u041a\u041f \u0420\u0423\u0421\u041e\u0424\u0418\u041b\u0418 \u0417\u0410 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f", "\u041a\u041f \u0421\u0412\u041e\u0411\u041e\u0414\u041d\u0418 \u0418\u0417\u0411\u0418\u0420\u0410\u0422\u0415\u041b\u0418 (\u0420\u0411, \u0421\u0421\u0414 \u0438 \u0417\u0421)": "\u041a\u041f \u0421\u0412\u041e\u0411\u041e\u0414\u041d\u0418 \u0418\u0417\u0411\u0418\u0420\u0410\u0422\u0415\u041b\u0418 (\u0420\u0411, \u0421\u0421\u0414 \u0438 \u0417\u0421)", "\u041c\u041e\u042f \u0421\u0422\u0420\u0410\u041d\u0410 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f": "\u041c\u041e\u042f \u0421\u0422\u0420\u0410\u041d\u0410 \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f", "\u041f\u041f \u0412\u0415\u041b\u0418\u0427\u0418\u0415": "\u041f\u041f \u0412\u0415\u041b\u0418\u0427\u0418\u0415", "\u041f\u041f \u0413\u041b\u0410\u0421 \u041d\u0410\u0420\u041e\u0414\u0415\u041d": "\u041f\u041f \u0413\u041b\u0410\u0421 \u041d\u0410\u0420\u041e\u0414\u0415\u041d", "\u041f\u041f \u0414\u041e\u0421\u0422": "\u041f\u041f \u0414\u041e\u0421\u0422", "\u041f\u041f \u0418\u041c\u0410 \u0422\u0410\u041a\u042a\u0412 \u041d\u0410\u0420\u041e\u0414": "\u041f\u041f \u0418\u041c\u0410 \u0422\u0410\u041a\u042a\u0412 \u041d\u0410\u0420\u041e\u0414", "\u041f\u041f \u041c\u0415\u0427": "\u041f\u041f \u041c\u0415\u0427", "\u041f\u041f \u041d\u0410\u0420\u041e\u0414\u041d\u0410 \u041f\u0410\u0420\u0422\u0418\u042f \u0418\u0421\u0422\u0418\u041d\u0410\u0422\u0410 \u0418 \u0421\u0410\u041c\u041e \u0418\u0421\u0422\u0418\u041d\u0410\u0422\u0410": "\u041f\u041f \u041d\u0410\u0420\u041e\u0414\u041d\u0410 \u041f\u0410\u0420\u0422\u0418\u042f \u0418\u0421\u0422\u0418\u041d\u0410\u0422\u0410 \u0418 \u0421\u0410\u041c\u041e \u0418\u0421\u0422\u0418\u041d\u0410\u0422\u0410", "\u041f\u0420\u0410\u0412\u041e\u0422\u041e": "\u041f\u0420\u0410\u0412\u041e\u0422\u041e", "\u041f\u0420\u042f\u041a\u0410 \u0414\u0415\u041c\u041e\u041a\u0420\u0410\u0426\u0418\u042f": "\u041f\u0420\u042f\u041a\u0410 \u0414\u0415\u041c\u041e\u041a\u0420\u0410\u0426\u0418\u042f", "\u041f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u044f \u043d\u0430 \u0417\u0415\u041b\u0415\u041d\u0418\u0422\u0415": "\u041f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u044f \u043d\u0430 \u0417\u0415\u041b\u0415\u041d\u0418\u0422\u0415", "\u0421\u0418\u041d\u042f \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f": "\u0421\u0418\u041d\u042f \u0411\u042a\u041b\u0413\u0410\u0420\u0418\u042f", "\u0421\u043e\u0446\u0438\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0430 \u043f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u044f \u0411\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0441\u043a\u0438 \u043f\u044a\u0442": "\u0421\u043e\u0446\u0438\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0430 \u043f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u044f \u0411\u044a\u043b\u0433\u0430\u0440\u0441\u043a\u0438 \u043f\u044a\u0442", "\u0427\u0410\u0412\u0414\u0410\u0420 \u0418\u0412\u0410\u041d\u041e\u0412 \u041f\u041e\u041f\u041e\u0412 - \u043d\u0435\u0437\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0441\u0438\u043c \u043a\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0438\u0434\u0430\u0442": "\u0427\u0410\u0412\u0414\u0410\u0420 \u0418\u0412\u0410\u041d\u041e\u0412 \u041f\u041e\u041f\u041e\u0412 - \u043d\u0435\u0437\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0441\u0438\u043c \u043a\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0438\u0434\u0430\u0442", "none_of_above": "none_of_above"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12920, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 11089, "votes_gt_valid": 11086}, "n_stations_flagged": 11090, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:29:44.581653", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.29, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.418, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.645, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.533, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.29, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.391, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.348, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.484, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.533, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.533, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.482, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.482, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 12920}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "61ba2d4f4e3a49ae9005a0590c458110", "name": "Italy 2013 parliamentary (overnight italy_2013_camera.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/ondata/elezionipolitiche2013 (Min Interno elezionistorico.interno.gov.it archive, Camera 24/02/2013, per-comune)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AUTONOMIE LIBERTE' DEMOCRATIE": "AUTONOMIE LIBERTE' DEMOCRATIE", "CASAPOUND ITALIA": "CASAPOUND ITALIA", "CENTRO DEMOCRATICO": "CENTRO DEMOCRATICO", "DEMOCRAZIA ATEA": "DEMOCRAZIA ATEA", "DIE FREIHEITLICHEN": "DIE FREIHEITLICHEN", "FARE PER FERMARE IL DECLINO": "FARE PER FERMARE IL DECLINO", "FIAMMA TRICOLORE": "FIAMMA TRICOLORE", "FORZA NUOVA": "FORZA NUOVA", "FRATELLI D'ITALIA": "FRATELLI D'ITALIA", "FUTURO E LIBERTA'": "FUTURO E LIBERTA'", "GRANDE SUD - MPA": "GRANDE SUD - MPA", "I PIRATI": "I PIRATI", "IL POPOLO DELLA LIBERTA'": "IL POPOLO DELLA LIBERTA'", "INDIPENDENZA PER LA SARDEGNA": "INDIPENDENZA PER LA SARDEGNA", "INDIPENDENZA VENETA": "INDIPENDENZA VENETA", "INTESA POPOLARE": "INTESA POPOLARE", "IO AMO L'ITALIA": "IO AMO L'ITALIA", "LA DESTRA": "LA DESTRA", "LEGA NORD": "LEGA NORD", "LG_VENETA REPUBBLICA": "LG_VENETA REPUBBLICA", "LIBERALI PER L'ITALIA - PLI": "LIBERALI PER L'ITALIA - PLI", "LIBERI PER UNA ITALIA EQUA": "LIBERI PER UNA ITALIA EQUA", "LISTA AMNISTIA GIUSTIZIA LIBERTA'": "LISTA AMNISTIA GIUSTIZIA LIBERTA'", "MERIS": "MERIS", "MIR - MODERATI IN RIVOLUZIONE": "MIR - MODERATI IN RIVOLUZIONE", "MOVIMENTO 5 STELLE BEPPEGRILLO_IT": "MOVIMENTO 5 STELLE BEPPEGRILLO_IT", "MOVIMENTO P_P_A_": "MOVIMENTO P_P_A_", "MOVIMENTO PROGETTO ITALIA - MID": "MOVIMENTO PROGETTO ITALIA - MID", "NATION VAL D'OUTA": "NATION VAL D'OUTA", "PARTITO COMUNISTA DEI LAVORATORI": "PARTITO COMUNISTA DEI LAVORATORI", "PARTITO DEMOCRATICO": "PARTITO DEMOCRATICO", "PARTITO DI ALTERNATIVA COMUNISTA": "PARTITO DI ALTERNATIVA COMUNISTA", "PARTITO PENSIONATI": "PARTITO PENSIONATI", "POPOLARI UNITI": "POPOLARI UNITI", "PRI": "PRI", "PROGETTO NAZIONALE": "PROGETTO NAZIONALE", "PS D'AZ_": "PS D'AZ_", "RIFONDAZIONE MISSINA ITALIANA": "RIFONDAZIONE MISSINA ITALIANA", "RIFORMISTI ITALIANI": "RIFORMISTI ITALIANI", "RIVOLUZIONE CIVILE": "RIVOLUZIONE CIVILE", "SCELTA CIVICA CON MONTI PER L'ITALIA": "SCELTA CIVICA CON MONTI PER L'ITALIA", "SINISTRA ECOLOGIA LIBERTA'": "SINISTRA ECOLOGIA LIBERTA'", "STAMINALI D'ITALIA": "STAMINALI D'ITALIA", "SVP": "SVP", "TUTTI INSIEME PER L'ITALIA": "TUTTI INSIEME PER L'ITALIA", "UNION VALDOTAINE PROGRESSISTE": "UNION VALDOTAINE PROGRESSISTE", "UNIONE DI CENTRO": "UNIONE DI CENTRO", "UNIONE POP_": "UNIONE POP_", "VALLEE D'AOSTE": "VALLEE D'AOSTE", "VENETO STATO": "VENETO STATO", "VOTO DI PROTESTA": "VOTO DI PROTESTA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8092, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 7942}, "n_stations_flagged": 7942, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:29:18.798040", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.891, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.963, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.864, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.786, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.563, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.694, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.044, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.511, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.786, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.786, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.196, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.196, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8092}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "339b42a7f919451d95aeff862883d96d", "name": "Italy 2018 parliamentary (camera dei deputati, proportional list vote) (overnight italy_2018_camera.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/ondata/elezionipolitiche2018 (faithful mirror of Ministero dell'Interno Eligendo opendata, source http://elezioni.interno.gov.it/eligendo); files dati/scrutiniCI_cm.csv + dati/riepilogo.csv", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"+EUROPA": "+EUROPA", "10 VOLTE MEGLIO": "10 VOLTE MEGLIO", "AUTODETERMINATZIONE": "AUTODETERMINATZIONE", "BLOCCO NAZIONALE PER LE LIBERTA": "BLOCCO NAZIONALE PER LE LIBERTA", "CASAPOUND ITALIA": "CASAPOUND ITALIA", "CIVICA POPOLARE LORENZIN": "CIVICA POPOLARE LORENZIN", "FI -FRAT D IT -MOV NUOVA VALLE D AOSTA": "FI -FRAT D IT -MOV NUOVA VALLE D AOSTA", "FORZA ITALIA": "FORZA ITALIA", "FRATELLI D ITALIA CON GIORGIA MELONI": "FRATELLI D ITALIA CON GIORGIA MELONI", "GRANDE NORD": "GRANDE NORD", "IL POPOLO DELLA FAMIGLIA": "IL POPOLO DELLA FAMIGLIA", "ITALIA AGLI ITALIANI": "ITALIA AGLI ITALIANI", "ITALIA EUROPA INSIEME": "ITALIA EUROPA INSIEME", "ITALIA NEL CUORE": "ITALIA NEL CUORE", "LEGA": "LEGA", "LIBERI E UGUALI": "LIBERI E UGUALI", "LISTA DEL POPOLO PER LA COSTITUZIONE": "LISTA DEL POPOLO PER LA COSTITUZIONE", "MOVIMENTO 5 STELLE": "MOVIMENTO 5 STELLE", "NOI CON L ITALIA - UDC": "NOI CON L ITALIA - UDC", "PARTITO COMUNISTA": "PARTITO COMUNISTA", "PARTITO DEMOCRATICO": "PARTITO DEMOCRATICO", "PARTITO REPUBBLICANO ITALIANO - ALA": "PARTITO REPUBBLICANO ITALIANO - ALA", "PARTITO VALORE UMANO": "PARTITO VALORE UMANO", "PATTO PER L AUTONOMIA": "PATTO PER L AUTONOMIA", "PD-UV-UVP-EPAV": "PD-UV-UVP-EPAV", "PER UNA SINISTRA RIVOLUZIONARIA": "PER UNA SINISTRA RIVOLUZIONARIA", "POTERE AL POPOLO!": "POTERE AL POPOLO!", "POUR TOUS PER TUTTI PE TCHEUT": "POUR TOUS PER TUTTI PE TCHEUT", "RINASCIMENTO MIR": "RINASCIMENTO MIR", "RISPOSTA CIVICA": "RISPOSTA CIVICA", "SIAMO": "SIAMO", "SVP - PATT": "SVP - PATT"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7960, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 7783, "cast_gt_registered": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 7783, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:28:53.882289", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.904, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.963, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.864, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.787, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.621, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.796, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.787, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.186, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7960}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "83af519c656f4744b7805eb903d2d8f9", "name": "Taiwan 2024 presidential (overnight taiwan_2024_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Taiwan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/kiang/db.cec.gov.tw (data/elections/2020-2024/<VILLCODE>.json); CC BY 4.0; data sourced from Central Election Commission (CEC) Taiwan db.cec.gov.tw", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Lai_Ching_te_DPP": "Lai_Ching_te_DPP", "Hou_Yu_ih_KMT": "Hou_Yu_ih_KMT", "Ko_Wen_je_TPP": "Ko_Wen_je_TPP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7747, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 7747, "registered_not_positive": 7747}, "n_stations_flagged": 7747, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:28:23.689771", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.877, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.941, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.804, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.707, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.294, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.462, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.707, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.707, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.22, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.22, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7747}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2268fd28adfa4b1eaf95571f9498ea31", "name": "Uruguay 2024 presidential_r2 (overnight uruguay_2024_presidential_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Uruguay", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://catalogodatos.gub.uy/dataset/corte-electoral-balotaje_2024", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"crv": "crv", "Orsi_Cosse_FA": "Orsi_Cosse_FA", "Delgado_Ripoll_PN": "Delgado_Ripoll_PN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7348, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 219, "cast_valid_mismatch": 7207, "registered_not_positive": 123, "votes_gt_valid": 7348}, "n_stations_flagged": 7348, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:28:00.948573", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.862, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.768, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.862, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.183, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.546, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7348}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7b462c2c51044986ad88f87d70085319", "name": "Uruguay 2024 presidential (overnight uruguay_2024_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Uruguay", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://catalogodatos.gub.uy/dataset/corte-electoral-elecciones-nacionales-2024 (resources: desglose-de-votos.csv + totales-generales-por-comision-receptora-de-votos.csv)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Asamblea_Popular": "Asamblea_Popular", "Avanzar_Republicano": "Avanzar_Republicano", "Cabildo_Abierto": "Cabildo_Abierto", "Colorado": "Colorado", "Constitucional_Ambientalista": "Constitucional_Ambientalista", "Ecologista_Radical_Intransigente": "Ecologista_Radical_Intransigente", "Frente_Amplio": "Frente_Amplio", "Identidad_Soberana": "Identidad_Soberana", "Independiente": "Independiente", "Nacional": "Nacional", "Por_Los_Cambios_Necesarios_PCN": "Por_Los_Cambios_Necesarios_PCN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7340, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 88, "invalid_gt_cast": 112, "cast_valid_mismatch": 7340, "registered_not_positive": 118}, "n_stations_flagged": 7340, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:27:30.482355", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.862, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.768, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.862, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.183, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.546, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7340}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "32165315960d487e8ec06e9e4a47adad", "name": "Jamaica 2020 parliamentary (overnight jamaica_2020_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Jamaica", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.ecj.com.jm/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/General-Election-2020-Final-Detailed-Result.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"electoral_division": "electoral_division", "epm": "epm", "JLP": "JLP", "PNP": "PNP", "IND": "IND"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6978, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 6978, "cast_gt_registered": 82}, "n_stations_flagged": 6978, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:27:09.490607", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.82, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.85, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.808, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.702, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.5, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.175, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.731, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.814, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.707, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.702, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.653, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.171, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.171, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6978}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "aed453efdb6b4aafa505d5f831ea2a8a", "name": "Bosnia and Herzegovina 2022 parliamentary (overnight bosnia_2022_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Bosnia and Herzegovina", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.izbori.ba/Rezultati_izbora/?resId=32&langId=1 (API: https://www.izbori.ba/api_2018, DB WebResult_2022GENT1_2022_4_20_14_10_43, race2 Parlamentarna skup\u0161tina BiH / Predstavni\u010dki dom)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"polling_station_id": "polling_station_id", "entity_id": "entity_id", "parent_id": "parent_id", "SDA__00090": "SDA__00090", "NASA_STRANKA__00877": "NASA_STRANKA__00877", "NES_ZA_NOVE_GENERACIJE__03073": "NES_ZA_NOVE_GENERACIJE__03073", "ZELJKO_KOMSIC__03068": "ZELJKO_KOMSIC__03068", "LABURISTICKA_STRANKA_BOSNE_I_HERCEGOVINE__01701": "LABURISTICKA_STRANKA_BOSNE_I_HERCEGOVINE__01701", "SDP__00008": "SDP__00008", "STRANKA_ZA_BOSNU_I_HERCEGOVINU_SBIH__00004": "STRANKA_ZA_BOSNU_I_HERCEGOVINU_SBIH__00004", "KOALICIJA_DRZAVA_MIRSAD_HADZIKADIC_PLATF__03089": "KOALICIJA_DRZAVA_MIRSAD_HADZIKADIC_PLATF__03089", "NAROD_I_PRAVDA__02317": "NAROD_I_PRAVDA__02317", "SDBIH_SOCIJALDEMOKRATE_BOSNE_I_HERCEGOVI__02711": "SDBIH_SOCIJALDEMOKRATE_BOSNE_I_HERCEGOVI__02711", "HDZ_BIH_HSS_HSP_BIH_HKDU_HSPAS_HDU_HSPHB__03097": "HDZ_BIH_HSS_HSP_BIH_HKDU_HSPAS_HDU_HSPHB__03097", "HRVATSKA_REPUBLIKANSKA_STRANKA__01705": "HRVATSKA_REPUBLIKANSKA_STRANKA__01705", "HDZ_1990__03093": "HDZ_1990__03093", "SAVEZ_ZA_BOLJU_BUDUCNOST_BIH__01182": "SAVEZ_ZA_BOLJU_BUDUCNOST_BIH__01182", "BOSANSKOHERCEGOVACKA_INICIJATIVA__03044": "BOSANSKOHERCEGOVACKA_INICIJATIVA__03044", "SAVEZ_ZA_NOVU_POLITIKU__01706": "SAVEZ_ZA_NOVU_POLITIKU__01706", "KRUG__02501": "KRUG__02501", "RE_BALANS__02496": "RE_BALANS__02496", "BOSANSKOHERCEGOVACKI_BH_ZELENI__02495": "BOSANSKOHERCEGOVACKI_BH_ZELENI__02495", "LIJEVO_KRILO__02327": "LIJEVO_KRILO__02327", "SMS__02325": "SMS__02325", "UJEDINJENA_SRPSKA__01972": "UJEDINJENA_SRPSKA__01972", "POKRET_DEMOKRATSKE_AKCIJE_PDA__02321": "POKRET_DEMOKRATSKE_AKCIJE_PDA__02321", "DNS_DEMOKRATSKI_NARODNI_SAVEZ__00461": "DNS_DEMOKRATSKI_NARODNI_SAVEZ__00461", "BPS_SEFER_HALILOVIC__00001": "BPS_SEFER_HALILOVIC__00001", "BOSS__00036": "BOSS__00036", "PDP__00440": "PDP__00440", "SAVEZ_NEZAVISNIH_SOCIJALDEMOKRATA__00515": "SAVEZ_NEZAVISNIH_SOCIJALDEMOKRATA__00515", "SDS_SRPSKA_DEMOKRATSKA_STRANKA__00018": "SDS_SRPSKA_DEMOKRATSKA_STRANKA__00018", "ZA_PRAVDU_I_RED__01702": "ZA_PRAVDU_I_RED__01702", "SOCIJALISTICKA_PARTIJA_PETAR_OKIC_SNP__03082": "SOCIJALISTICKA_PARTIJA_PETAR_OKIC_SNP__03082", "STRANKA_ZIVOT__03045": "STRANKA_ZIVOT__03045", "DEMOKRATSKI_SAVEZ_DEMOS__02420": "DEMOKRATSKI_SAVEZ_DEMOS__02420"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5557, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 5557}, "n_stations_flagged": 5557, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:26:19.909469", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.487, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.5, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.521, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.344, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.487, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.5, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.9, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.725, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.826, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.707, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.461, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.521, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.344, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.344, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.366, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.366, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.813, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.813, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.662, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.662, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 5557}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "88c89ae86ce043d0b7fda02e0a6e06c2", "name": "Mauritania 2024 presidential (overnight mauritania_2024_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mauritania", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://res-myceni.org/?elect2024=true (CENI MyCENI Flutter results app; \"Tlchargement intgral des rsultats par bureau de vote\" -> resultat_presidentiel_2024.csv; backend Firebase project myceniresultats, collection pres_voix)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"null": "null", "Biram Dah Abeid": "Biram Dah Abeid", "El Id Mohameden M\u2019Bareck": "El Id Mohameden M\u2019Bareck", "Hamadi Sid\u2019El Moctar Mohamed Abdi": "Hamadi Sid\u2019El Moctar Mohamed Abdi", "Mamadou Bocar Ba": "Mamadou Bocar Ba", "Mohamed Cheikh Ghazouani": "Mohamed Cheikh Ghazouani", "Mohamed Lemine El Mourteji El Wavi": "Mohamed Lemine El Mourteji El Wavi", "Outouma Antoine Souleymane Soumar\u00e9": "Outouma Antoine Souleymane Soumar\u00e9"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4503, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 5, "cast_gt_registered": 9, "votes_gt_valid": 4390}, "n_stations_flagged": 4390, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:25:58.595224", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.962, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.354, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.337, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.136, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.962, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.49, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.354, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.589, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.684, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.297, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.324, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.331, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.333, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.515, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.379, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.385, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.346, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.337, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.337, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.136, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.531, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.531, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.167, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.167, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4503}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7d86de9839c644c88399df00356e6fc5", "name": "North Macedonia 2024 presidential_r2 (overnight north_macedonia_2024_r2_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "North Macedonia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ep.sec.mk/  (SEC iVote DEMOKRA portal) - data API https://admin-ep.sec.mk/api/election-export (election_type=presidential, election_year=2024, election_round_id=30, municipality_id per area from /api/results/election-round-areas)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u0413\u043e\u0440\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0430_\u0421\u0438\u0459\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0441\u043a\u0430_\u0414\u0430\u0432\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0430": "\u0413\u043e\u0440\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0430_\u0421\u0438\u0459\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0441\u043a\u0430_\u0414\u0430\u0432\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0430", "\u0421\u0442\u0435\u0432\u043e_\u041f\u0435\u043d\u0434\u0430\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0441\u043a\u0438": "\u0421\u0442\u0435\u0432\u043e_\u041f\u0435\u043d\u0434\u0430\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0441\u043a\u0438"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3476, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:25:40.439341", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.119, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.293, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.557, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.37, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.293, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.517, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.285, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.393, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.547, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.637, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.364, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.557, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.37, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.368, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.754, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.658, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3476}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4b953637ed7849ed945f25856cc0c273", "name": "North Macedonia 2024 presidential_r1 (overnight north_macedonia_2024_r1_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "North Macedonia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ep.sec.mk/  (SEC iVote DEMOKRA portal) - data API https://admin-ep.sec.mk/api/election-export (election_type=presidential, election_year=2024, election_round_id=29, municipality_id per area from /api/results/election-round-areas)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u0410\u0440\u0431\u0435\u043d_\u0422\u0430\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430\u0440\u0438": "\u0410\u0440\u0431\u0435\u043d_\u0422\u0430\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0430\u0440\u0438", "\u0411\u0438\u043b\u0458\u0430\u043d\u0430_\u0412\u0430\u043d\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0441\u043a\u0430_\u0426\u0432\u0435\u0442\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0441\u043a\u0430": "\u0411\u0438\u043b\u0458\u0430\u043d\u0430_\u0412\u0430\u043d\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0441\u043a\u0430_\u0426\u0432\u0435\u0442\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0441\u043a\u0430", "\u0411\u0443\u0458\u0430\u0440_\u041e\u0441\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0438": "\u0411\u0443\u0458\u0430\u0440_\u041e\u0441\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0438", "\u0413\u043e\u0440\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0430_\u0421\u0438\u0459\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0441\u043a\u0430_\u0414\u0430\u0432\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0430": "\u0413\u043e\u0440\u0434\u0430\u043d\u0430_\u0421\u0438\u0459\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0441\u043a\u0430_\u0414\u0430\u0432\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0430", "\u041c\u0430\u043a\u0441\u0438\u043c_\u0414\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0442\u0440\u0438\u0435\u0432\u0441\u043a\u0438": "\u041c\u0430\u043a\u0441\u0438\u043c_\u0414\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0442\u0440\u0438\u0435\u0432\u0441\u043a\u0438", "\u0421\u0442\u0435\u0432\u043e_\u041f\u0435\u043d\u0434\u0430\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0441\u043a\u0438": "\u0421\u0442\u0435\u0432\u043e_\u041f\u0435\u043d\u0434\u0430\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0441\u043a\u0438", "\u0421\u0442\u0435\u0432\u0447\u043e_\u0408\u0430\u043a\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0432\u0441\u043a\u0438": "\u0421\u0442\u0435\u0432\u0447\u043e_\u0408\u0430\u043a\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0432\u0441\u043a\u0438"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3474, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:25:29.890197", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.119, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.293, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.557, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.37, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.293, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.517, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.285, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.393, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.547, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.637, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.364, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.557, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.37, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.368, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.754, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.658, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3474}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4725034f9a4b45d5a189de301eab4ea4", "name": "North Macedonia 2024 parliamentary (overnight north_macedonia_2024_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "North Macedonia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://admin-ep.sec.mk/api/results/election-round-political-parties?locale=mk&election_type=parliamentary&election_year=2024&election_round_id=31 (per constituency_id/municipality_id/polling_station_id); station list via /api/results/election-round-areas; frontend https://ep.sec.mk", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"\u041a\u043e\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0446\u0438\u0458\u0430 \u0422\u0412\u041e\u0408\u0410 \u041c\u0410\u041a\u0415\u0414\u041e\u041d\u0418\u0408\u0410": "\u041a\u043e\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0446\u0438\u0458\u0430 \u0422\u0412\u041e\u0408\u0410 \u041c\u0410\u041a\u0415\u0414\u041e\u041d\u0418\u0408\u0410", "\u041a\u043e\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0446\u0438\u0458\u0430 \u0417\u0410 \u0415\u0412\u0420\u041e\u041f\u0421\u041a\u0410 \u0418\u0414\u041d\u0418\u041d\u0410": "\u041a\u043e\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0446\u0438\u0458\u0430 \u0417\u0410 \u0415\u0412\u0420\u041e\u041f\u0421\u041a\u0410 \u0418\u0414\u041d\u0418\u041d\u0410", "\u041a\u043e\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0446\u0438\u0458\u0430 \u0415\u0412\u0420\u041e\u041f\u0421\u041a\u0418 \u0424\u0420\u041e\u041d\u0422": "\u041a\u043e\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0446\u0438\u0458\u0430 \u0415\u0412\u0420\u041e\u041f\u0421\u041a\u0418 \u0424\u0420\u041e\u041d\u0422", "\u041a\u041e\u0410\u041b\u0418\u0426\u0418\u0408\u0410 \u0412\u041b\u0415\u041d": "\u041a\u041e\u0410\u041b\u0418\u0426\u0418\u0408\u0410 \u0412\u041b\u0415\u041d", "\u041f\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043a\u0430 \u041f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0458\u0430 \u041b\u0415\u0412\u0418\u0426\u0410": "\u041f\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043a\u0430 \u041f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0458\u0430 \u041b\u0415\u0412\u0418\u0426\u0410", "\u0414\u0432\u0438\u0436\u0435\u045a\u0435 \u0417\u041d\u0410\u041c - \u0417\u0430 \u041d\u0430\u0448\u0430 \u041c\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u0438\u0458\u0430": "\u0414\u0432\u0438\u0436\u0435\u045a\u0435 \u0417\u041d\u0410\u041c - \u0417\u0430 \u041d\u0430\u0448\u0430 \u041c\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u0438\u0458\u0430", "\u041a\u043e\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0446\u0438\u0458\u0430 \u0425\u0420\u0410\u0411\u0420\u041e \u0417\u0410 \u041c\u0410\u041a\u0415\u0414\u041e\u041d\u0418\u0408\u0410": "\u041a\u043e\u0430\u043b\u0438\u0446\u0438\u0458\u0430 \u0425\u0420\u0410\u0411\u0420\u041e \u0417\u0410 \u041c\u0410\u041a\u0415\u0414\u041e\u041d\u0418\u0408\u0410", "\u041f\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043a\u0430 \u043f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0458\u0430 \u041d\u041e\u0412\u0410 \u0410\u041b\u0422\u0415\u0420\u041d\u0410\u0422\u0418\u0412\u0410 \u0421\u043a\u043e\u043f\u0458\u0435": "\u041f\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043a\u0430 \u043f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0458\u0430 \u041d\u041e\u0412\u0410 \u0410\u041b\u0422\u0415\u0420\u041d\u0410\u0422\u0418\u0412\u0410 \u0421\u043a\u043e\u043f\u0458\u0435", "\u041f\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043a\u0430 \u043f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0458\u0430 \u0410\u0412\u0410\u0408\u0410": "\u041f\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043a\u0430 \u043f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0458\u0430 \u0410\u0412\u0410\u0408\u0410", "\u0422\u0432\u043e\u0458\u0430 \u041f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0458\u0430": "\u0422\u0432\u043e\u0458\u0430 \u041f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0458\u0430", "\u0415\u0434\u0438\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u0430 \u041c\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u0438\u0458\u0430": "\u0415\u0434\u0438\u043d\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0435\u043d\u0430 \u041c\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u0438\u0458\u0430", "\u0420\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043d\u0430 \u041c\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u0438\u0458\u0430": "\u0420\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043d\u0430 \u041c\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u0438\u0458\u0430", "\u041c\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0430 \u0415\u0440\u0430 \u0422\u0440\u0435\u0442\u0430 \u041c\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0438 \u043d\u0435\u0437\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0441\u043d\u0438 \u043b\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u2013 \u0421\u0443\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0438": "\u041c\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0430 \u0415\u0440\u0430 \u0422\u0440\u0435\u0442\u0430 \u041c\u0430\u043a\u0435\u0434\u043e\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0438 \u043d\u0435\u0437\u0430\u0432\u0438\u0441\u043d\u0438 \u043b\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u2013 \u0421\u0443\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0438", "\u041f\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043a\u0430 \u043f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0458\u0430 \u0414\u0415\u041c\u041e\u041a\u0420\u0410\u0422\u0418 \u0421\u043a\u043e\u043f\u0458\u0435": "\u041f\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043a\u0430 \u043f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0458\u0430 \u0414\u0415\u041c\u041e\u041a\u0420\u0410\u0422\u0418 \u0421\u043a\u043e\u043f\u0458\u0435", "\u041f\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043a\u0430 \u043f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0458\u0430 \u0414\u0415\u0421\u041d\u0410": "\u041f\u043e\u043b\u0438\u0442\u0438\u0447\u043a\u0430 \u043f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0458\u0430 \u0414\u0415\u0421\u041d\u0410", "\u0420\u0410\u0411\u041e\u0422\u041d\u0418\u0427\u041a\u0410 \u041f\u0410\u0420\u0422\u0418\u0408\u0410": "\u0420\u0410\u0411\u041e\u0422\u041d\u0418\u0427\u041a\u0410 \u041f\u0410\u0420\u0422\u0418\u0408\u0410", "\u0415\u0412\u0420\u041e\u041f\u0421\u041a\u041e \u0413\u0420\u0410\u0403\u0410\u041d\u0421\u041a\u041e \u0414\u0412\u0418\u0416\u0415\u040a\u0415": "\u0415\u0412\u0420\u041e\u041f\u0421\u041a\u041e \u0413\u0420\u0410\u0403\u0410\u041d\u0421\u041a\u041e \u0414\u0412\u0418\u0416\u0415\u040a\u0415"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3463, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:25:18.134121", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.119, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.293, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.557, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.37, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.293, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.517, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.285, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.393, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.547, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.637, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.364, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.557, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.37, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.368, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.754, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.658, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3463}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e38d2cf4f1534561b36921fb4d76933e", "name": "Moldova 2025 Parliamentary (per station)", "metadata": {"country": "Moldova", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://rezultate.cec.md/api/api/ (CEC results portal; GetReport SSRS HTML per circumscription/region/station; ElectionId=10090 ElectionRoundId=20179 Parlamentare 2025)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_p20": "votes_p20", "votes_p02": "votes_p02", "votes_p01": "votes_p01", "votes_p18": "votes_p18", "votes_p21": "votes_p21", "votes_p13": "votes_p13", "votes_p08": "votes_p08", "votes_p05": "votes_p05", "votes_p06": "votes_p06", "votes_p12": "votes_p12", "votes_p03": "votes_p03", "votes_p22": "votes_p22", "votes_p15": "votes_p15", "votes_p17": "votes_p17", "votes_p04": "votes_p04", "votes_p07": "votes_p07", "votes_p09": "votes_p09", "votes_p19": "votes_p19", "votes_p11": "votes_p11", "votes_p10": "votes_p10", "votes_p14": "votes_p14", "votes_p16": "votes_p16", "votes_p23": "votes_p23"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2273, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:24:50.001080", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.233, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.056, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.553, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.449, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.233, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.056, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.274, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.48, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.62, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.425, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.187, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.388, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.553, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.449, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.44, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.325, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.325, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.652, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2273}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0f8bab893c944bfca037e67cb285afab", "name": "Armenia 2021 parliamentary (overnight armenia_2021_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Armenia", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://res.elections.am/images/doc/resultsarm20.06.21v.xlsx", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"registered_main": "registered_main", "Fair Armenia": "Fair Armenia", "Armenian National Congress": "Armenian National Congress", "Civil Contract": "Civil Contract", "Zartonk National Christian": "Zartonk National Christian", "Liberty": "Liberty", "With Honor (alliance)": "With Honor (alliance)", "United Homeland": "United Homeland", "Pan-Armenian National Statehood": "Pan-Armenian National Statehood", "Bright Armenia": "Bright Armenia", "Our Home is Armenia": "Our Home is Armenia", "Republic": "Republic", "Hayots Hayreniq": "Hayots Hayreniq", "Free Motherland (alliance)": "Free Motherland (alliance)", "Prosperous Armenia": "Prosperous Armenia", "Democratic Party of Armenia": "Democratic Party of Armenia", "5165 National Conservative Movement": "5165 National Conservative Movement", "Citizen's Decision SD": "Citizen's Decision SD", "Shirinyan-Babadjanyan Democrats Union": "Shirinyan-Babadjanyan Democrats Union", "National Agenda": "National Agenda", "Verelq": "Verelq", "Liberal": "Liberal", "European Party of Armenia": "European Party of Armenia", "Armenia (alliance)": "Armenia (alliance)", "National Democratic Axis": "National Democratic Axis", "Sovereign Armenia": "Sovereign Armenia"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2008, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 464, "votes_gt_valid": 2008}, "n_stations_flagged": 2008, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:24:35.978997", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.024, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.583, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.724, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.532, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.583, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.051, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.471, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.029, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.764, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.514, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.532, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.532, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.311, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.311, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2008}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b19724a1f4e54436827e3e1b60f1a7f5", "name": "Montenegro 2023 parliamentary (overnight montenegro_2023_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Montenegro", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.dik.co.me/images/DIK-media/izbori/parlamentarni/2023/Konacni-rezultati-po-birackim-mjestima.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Bosnjacka_stranka_Jasno_je": "Bosnjacka_stranka_Jasno_je", "HGI_Na_pravoj_strani_svijeta": "HGI_Na_pravoj_strani_svijeta", "Pravda_za_sve_Vladimir_Leposavic": "Pravda_za_sve_Vladimir_Leposavic", "SNP_DEMOS_Za_tebe": "SNP_DEMOS_Za_tebe", "Narodna_koalicija_Slozno_i_tacka": "Narodna_koalicija_Slozno_i_tacka", "Albanska_alijansa": "Albanska_alijansa", "Preokret_za_sigurnu_Crnu_Goru_Srdjan_Peric": "Preokret_za_sigurnu_Crnu_Goru_Srdjan_Peric", "Pokret_za_promjene_PRVO_CRNA_GORA_Medojevic": "Pokret_za_promjene_PRVO_CRNA_GORA_Medojevic", "DA_Mi_mozemo_za_gradjansku_Crnu_Goru": "DA_Mi_mozemo_za_gradjansku_Crnu_Goru", "Zajedno_DPS_SD_DUA_LP_Zivkovic": "Zajedno_DPS_SD_DUA_LP_Zivkovic", "Evropa_sad_Milojko_Spajic": "Evropa_sad_Milojko_Spajic", "SDP_Za_nasu_kucu": "SDP_Za_nasu_kucu", "Aleksa_i_Dritan_Hrabro_se_broji": "Aleksa_i_Dritan_Hrabro_se_broji", "Za_buducnost_Crne_Gore": "Za_buducnost_Crne_Gore", "Albanski_forum_Nik_Gjeloshaj_BESA": "Albanski_forum_Nik_Gjeloshaj_BESA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1154, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1154, "cast_gt_registered": 1154}, "n_stations_flagged": 1154, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:24:28.435034", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.697, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.948, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.61, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.491, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.208, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.578, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.644, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.578, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.644, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.422, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.61, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.491, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.491, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.492, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.492, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1154}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ab78faddd34e4231b1229d9dec76149b", "name": "Belgium 2024 parliamentary (overnight belgium_2024_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Belgium", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://api.electionresults.belgium.be/  (official IBZ/SPF Intrieur JSON API; election id 51207; /election-level/{id} per municipality)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"nis_code": "nis_code", "special_vote_unit": "special_vote_unit", "party_Agora": "party_Agora", "party_BELG_UNIE-BUB": "party_BELG_UNIE-BUB", "party_BLANCO": "party_BLANCO", "party_CD&V": "party_CD&V", "party_CHEZ NOUS": "party_CHEZ NOUS", "party_COLLECTIF CITOYEN": "party_COLLECTIF CITOYEN", "party_DierAnimal": "party_DierAnimal", "party_D\u00e9FI": "party_D\u00e9FI", "party_ECOLO": "party_ECOLO", "party_GROEN": "party_GROEN", "party_GV-GEZOND VERSTAND": "party_GV-GEZOND VERSTAND", "party_LES ENGAG\u00c9S": "party_LES ENGAG\u00c9S", "party_LUTTE OUVRIERE": "party_LUTTE OUVRIERE", "party_MR": "party_MR", "party_N-VA": "party_N-VA", "party_PS": "party_PS", "party_PTB": "party_PTB", "party_PTB-PVDA": "party_PTB-PVDA", "party_PVDA": "party_PVDA", "party_Parti_j BLANCO": "party_Parti_j BLANCO", "party_Partij BLANCO": "party_Partij BLANCO", "party_RMC": "party_RMC", "party_Team Fouad Ahidar": "party_Team Fouad Ahidar", "party_VLAAMS BELANG": "party_VLAAMS BELANG", "party_Volt Europa": "party_Volt Europa", "party_Voor U": "party_Voor U", "party_Voor U _ Pour Vous": "party_Voor U _ Pour Vous", "party_Vooruit": "party_Vooruit", "party_l'Unie": "party_l'Unie", "party_open vld": "party_open vld"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 592, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 592, "cast_gt_registered": 592, "votes_gt_valid": 592}, "n_stations_flagged": 592, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:24:25.761989", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.873, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.891, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.81, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.794, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.321, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.08, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.031, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.031, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.969, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 592}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c4765a67311c4e3dbcad74439557896f", "name": "Cyprus 2023 presidential_r2 (overnight cyprus_2023_presidential_r2.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cyprus", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.elections.moi.gov.cy/api/english/Results (Ministry of Interior Central Electoral Service)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ps_id": "ps_id", "district_id": "district_id", "CHRISTODOULIDIS_NIKOS": "CHRISTODOULIDIS_NIKOS", "MAVROGIANNIS_ANDREAS": "MAVROGIANNIS_ANDREAS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 510, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 510, "cast_valid_mismatch": 416}, "n_stations_flagged": 510, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:24:23.537932", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.774, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.847, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.777, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.643, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.251, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.643, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.643, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.674, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.196, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.196, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 510}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "973d86a4c1fb482d9f841ca699a586d8", "name": "Cyprus 2023 presidential (overnight cyprus_2023_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cyprus", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://results.elections.moi.gov.cy/api/english/Results (Ministry of Interior Central Electoral Service)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ps_id": "ps_id", "district_id": "district_id", "CHRISTODOULIDIS_NIKOS": "CHRISTODOULIDIS_NIKOS", "NEOFYTOU_AVEROF": "NEOFYTOU_AVEROF", "MAVROGIANNIS_ANDREAS": "MAVROGIANNIS_ANDREAS", "CHRISTOU_CHRISTOS": "CHRISTOU_CHRISTOS", "EFSTRATIOU_ANDREAS": "EFSTRATIOU_ANDREAS", "KOLOKASIDIS_GIORGOS": "KOLOKASIDIS_GIORGOS", "NTE_PETRO_TSELESTINA": "NTE_PETRO_TSELESTINA", "DIMITRIADIS_ACHILLEAS": "DIMITRIADIS_ACHILLEAS", "SAVVIDIS_ALEXIOS": "SAVVIDIS_ALEXIOS", "CHRISTOFIDIS_KONSTANTINOS": "CHRISTOFIDIS_KONSTANTINOS", "ZERVIDIS_ANDRONIKOS": "ZERVIDIS_ANDRONIKOS", "STAVROU_LOUKAS": "STAVROU_LOUKAS", "ARISTOTELOUS_CHARALAMPOS": "ARISTOTELOUS_CHARALAMPOS", "CHOVRINA_KOMNINOS_IOULIA": "CHOVRINA_KOMNINOS_IOULIA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 510, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 358, "votes_gt_valid": 510}, "n_stations_flagged": 510, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:24:21.486883", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.774, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.847, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.777, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.643, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.251, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.643, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.643, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.674, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.196, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.196, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 510}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f405293aafb74ec08b0aa5ca75129796", "name": "Thailand 2023 parliamentary_party_list (overnight thailand_2023_partylist.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Thailand", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://github.com/thanaphornkanking/thailand-election-2023-data (ectreport66.xlsx; official ECT report66 / ectreport.com data)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cons_no": "cons_no", "percent_turn_out": "percent_turn_out", "701_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e31\u0e15\u0e22\u0e4c": "701_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e31\u0e15\u0e22\u0e4c", "702_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e01\u0e23\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "702_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e01\u0e23\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "703_\u0e04\u0e27\u0e32\u0e21\u0e2b\u0e27\u0e31\u0e07\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48": "703_\u0e04\u0e27\u0e32\u0e21\u0e2b\u0e27\u0e31\u0e07\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48", "705_\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "705_\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "706_\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e1e\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e32\u0e01\u0e25\u0e49\u0e32": "706_\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e1e\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e32\u0e01\u0e25\u0e49\u0e32", "707_\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e1e\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e32": "707_\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e1e\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e32", "708_\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e32\u0e04\u0e15\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "708_\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e32\u0e04\u0e15\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "709_\u0e20\u0e39\u0e21\u0e34\u0e43\u0e08\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "709_\u0e20\u0e39\u0e21\u0e34\u0e43\u0e08\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "710_\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e07\u0e04\u0e21\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e44\u0e15\u0e22\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "710_\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e07\u0e04\u0e21\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e44\u0e15\u0e22\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "712_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e44\u0e15\u0e22\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48": "712_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e44\u0e15\u0e22\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48", "714_\u0e04\u0e23\u0e39\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e19": "714_\u0e04\u0e23\u0e39\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e19", "715_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e2a\u0e2b\u0e01\u0e23\u0e13\u0e4c": "715_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e2a\u0e2b\u0e01\u0e23\u0e13\u0e4c", "717_\u0e16\u0e34\u0e48\u0e19\u0e01\u0e32\u0e02\u0e32\u0e27\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e27\u0e27\u0e34\u0e44\u0e25": "717_\u0e16\u0e34\u0e48\u0e19\u0e01\u0e32\u0e02\u0e32\u0e27\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e27\u0e27\u0e34\u0e44\u0e25", "718_\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e29\u0e4c\u0e1c\u0e37\u0e19\u0e1b\u0e48\u0e32\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e40\u0e17\u0e28\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "718_\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e29\u0e4c\u0e1c\u0e37\u0e19\u0e1b\u0e48\u0e32\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e40\u0e17\u0e28\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "719_\u0e40\u0e2a\u0e23\u0e35\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "719_\u0e40\u0e2a\u0e23\u0e35\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "721_\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34": "721_\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34", "722_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e44\u0e15\u0e22": "722_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e18\u0e34\u0e1b\u0e44\u0e15\u0e22", "723_\u0e20\u0e23\u0e32\u0e14\u0e23\u0e20\u0e32\u0e1e": "723_\u0e20\u0e23\u0e32\u0e14\u0e23\u0e20\u0e32\u0e1e", "724_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34": "724_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e23\u0e31\u0e01\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34", "725_\u0e0a\u0e48\u0e27\u0e22\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34": "725_\u0e0a\u0e48\u0e27\u0e22\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34", "726_\u0e01\u0e49\u0e32\u0e27\u0e44\u0e01\u0e25": "726_\u0e01\u0e49\u0e32\u0e27\u0e44\u0e01\u0e25", "727_\u0e17\u0e32\u0e07\u0e40\u0e25\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e01\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48": "727_\u0e17\u0e32\u0e07\u0e40\u0e25\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e01\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48", "728_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e20\u0e34\u0e27\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e4c": "728_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e20\u0e34\u0e27\u0e31\u0e12\u0e19\u0e4c", "729_\u0e40\u0e2a\u0e49\u0e19\u0e14\u0e49\u0e32\u0e22": "729_\u0e40\u0e2a\u0e49\u0e19\u0e14\u0e49\u0e32\u0e22", "731_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48": "731_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48", "732_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21": "732_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21", "733_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e28\u0e23\u0e35\u0e27\u0e34\u0e44\u0e25\u0e22\u0e4c": "733_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e28\u0e23\u0e35\u0e27\u0e34\u0e44\u0e25\u0e22\u0e4c", "734_\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07": "734_\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07", "736_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e1e\u0e23\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e21": "736_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e1e\u0e23\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e21", "737_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e27\u0e07\u0e0a\u0e19\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "737_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e27\u0e07\u0e0a\u0e19\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "738_\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "738_\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "739_\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e41\u0e1c\u0e48\u0e19\u0e14\u0e34\u0e19": "739_\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e41\u0e1c\u0e48\u0e19\u0e14\u0e34\u0e19", "740_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34": "740_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34", "741_\u0e41\u0e1c\u0e48\u0e19\u0e14\u0e34\u0e19\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21": "741_\u0e41\u0e1c\u0e48\u0e19\u0e14\u0e34\u0e19\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21", "742_\u0e04\u0e25\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "742_\u0e04\u0e25\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "743_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e23\u0e31\u0e10": "743_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e23\u0e31\u0e10", "745_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e07\u0e04\u0e21": "745_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e07\u0e04\u0e21", "747_\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e47\u0e19\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21": "747_\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e47\u0e19\u0e18\u0e23\u0e23\u0e21", "748_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "748_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "749_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "749_\u0e1b\u0e23\u0e30\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "750_\u0e01\u0e23\u0e35\u0e19": "750_\u0e01\u0e23\u0e35\u0e19", "751_\u0e2a\u0e32\u0e21\u0e31\u0e0d\u0e0a\u0e19": "751_\u0e2a\u0e32\u0e21\u0e31\u0e0d\u0e0a\u0e19", "752_\u0e20\u0e32\u0e04\u0e35\u0e40\u0e04\u0e23\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e02\u0e48\u0e32\u0e22\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "752_\u0e20\u0e32\u0e04\u0e35\u0e40\u0e04\u0e23\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e02\u0e48\u0e32\u0e22\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "755_\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e32\u0e04\u0e15\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "755_\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e32\u0e04\u0e15\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "758_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "758_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "761_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e07\u0e04\u0e21\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48": "761_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e2a\u0e31\u0e07\u0e04\u0e21\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48", "762_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e2a\u0e23\u0e49\u0e32\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "762_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e2a\u0e23\u0e49\u0e32\u0e07\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "763_\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e2a\u0e23\u0e49\u0e32\u0e07\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34": "763_\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e2a\u0e23\u0e49\u0e32\u0e07\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34", "764_\u0e21\u0e34\u0e15\u0e34\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48": "764_\u0e21\u0e34\u0e15\u0e34\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48", "765_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e32\u0e23\u0e4c\u0e17": "765_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e32\u0e23\u0e4c\u0e17", "767_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e2a\u0e22\u0e32\u0e21": "767_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07\u0e2a\u0e22\u0e32\u0e21", "768_\u0e40\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e2d\u0e20\u0e32\u0e04": "768_\u0e40\u0e2a\u0e21\u0e2d\u0e20\u0e32\u0e04", "769_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e20\u0e31\u0e01\u0e14\u0e35": "769_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e20\u0e31\u0e01\u0e14\u0e35", "770_\u0e41\u0e19\u0e27\u0e17\u0e32\u0e07\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48": "770_\u0e41\u0e19\u0e27\u0e17\u0e32\u0e07\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48", "771_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e0a\u0e19\u0e30": "771_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e0a\u0e19\u0e30", "773_\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e44\u0e17\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07": "773_\u0e40\u0e1e\u0e37\u0e48\u0e2d\u0e44\u0e17\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07", "774_\u0e23\u0e32\u0e29\u0e0e\u0e23\u0e4c\u0e27\u0e34\u0e16\u0e35": "774_\u0e23\u0e32\u0e29\u0e0e\u0e23\u0e4c\u0e27\u0e34\u0e16\u0e35", "775_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e47\u0e19\u0e2b\u0e19\u0e36\u0e48\u0e07": "775_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e47\u0e19\u0e2b\u0e19\u0e36\u0e48\u0e07", "776_\u0e17\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e17\u0e35\u0e48\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "776_\u0e17\u0e49\u0e2d\u0e07\u0e17\u0e35\u0e48\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "777_\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e25\u0e35\u0e48\u0e22\u0e19\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e32\u0e04\u0e15": "777_\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e25\u0e35\u0e48\u0e22\u0e19\u0e2d\u0e19\u0e32\u0e04\u0e15", "778_\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48": "778_\u0e43\u0e2b\u0e21\u0e48", "779_\u0e41\u0e23\u0e07\u0e07\u0e32\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e23\u0e49\u0e32\u0e07\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34": "779_\u0e41\u0e23\u0e07\u0e07\u0e32\u0e19\u0e2a\u0e23\u0e49\u0e32\u0e07\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34", "780_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e01\u0e49\u0e32\u0e27\u0e2b\u0e19\u0e49\u0e32": "780_\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22\u0e01\u0e49\u0e32\u0e27\u0e2b\u0e19\u0e49\u0e32", "781_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07": "781_\u0e1e\u0e25\u0e31\u0e07", "783_\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e23\u0e38\u0e48\u0e07\u0e40\u0e23\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e07": "783_\u0e0a\u0e32\u0e15\u0e34\u0e23\u0e38\u0e48\u0e07\u0e40\u0e23\u0e37\u0e2d\u0e07", "784_\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e43\u0e08\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22": "784_\u0e23\u0e27\u0e21\u0e43\u0e08\u0e44\u0e17\u0e22", "786_\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e25\u0e35\u0e48\u0e22\u0e19": "786_\u0e40\u0e1b\u0e25\u0e35\u0e48\u0e22\u0e19"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 400, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 400, "cast_valid_mismatch": 400}, "n_stations_flagged": 400, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:24:19.629825", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.266, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.295, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.16, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.576, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.099, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.275, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.632, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.295, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.191, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.191, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.654, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.557, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 400}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a3a55a9309d34af1ae3f024bc12e6b82", "name": "Greece 2019 parliamentary (overnight greece_2019_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Greece", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "http://ekloges-prev.singularlogic.eu/2019/dyn/v/dhm_{code}.js (official MoI/SingularLogic results backend, same host validated for 2023)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"municipality_code": "municipality_code", "district_code": "district_code", "nd_2": "nd_2", "kke_3": "kke_3", "syriza_4": "syriza_4", "mlkkke_10": "mlkkke_10", "enosi_kentroon_15": "enosi_kentroon_15", "vergis_20": "vergis_20", "eek_40": "eek_40", "golden_dawn_41": "golden_dawn_41", "antarsya_44": "antarsya_44", "ethDim_60": "ethDim_60", "okde_66": "okde_66", "laiki_enotita_100": "laiki_enotita_100", "pasok_106": "pasok_106", "ellinikiLysi_108": "ellinikiLysi_108", "elsyn_113": "elsyn_113", "mera25_122": "mera25_122", "pleusi_123": "pleusi_123", "kkeml_125": "kkeml_125", "epam_akkel_126": "epam_akkel_126", "party_127_127": "party_127_127", "anex_memon_998": "anex_memon_998"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 332, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 332}, "n_stations_flagged": 332, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:24:17.665295", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.93, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.954, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.864, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.763, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.693, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.023, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.739, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.924, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.173, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.905, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 332}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a1f5a99d21604b39a5421ce23d31b620", "name": "Greece 2023 parliamentary (overnight greece_2023_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Greece", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "http://ekloges-prev.singularlogic.eu/2023/june/dyn/v/dhm_{code}.js (official MoI/SingularLogic results backend behind https://ekloges.ypes.gr/current/v/public/)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"municipality_code": "municipality_code", "district_code": "district_code", "nd_2": "nd_2", "kke_3": "kke_3", "syriza_4": "syriza_4", "mlkkke_10": "mlkkke_10", "oakke_11": "oakke_11", "enosi_kentroon_15": "enosi_kentroon_15", "vergis_20": "vergis_20", "oikologoi_prasinoi_28": "oikologoi_prasinoi_28", "antarsya_44": "antarsya_44", "party_65_65": "party_65_65", "okde_66": "okde_66", "ethniko_metopo_78": "ethniko_metopo_78", "pasok_106": "pasok_106", "ellinikiLysi_108": "ellinikiLysi_108", "elsyn_113": "elsyn_113", "mera25_122": "mera25_122", "pleusi_123": "pleusi_123", "kkeml_125": "kkeml_125", "kinimaftoxon_130": "kinimaftoxon_130", "niki_131": "niki_131", "pnoi_dimokratias_140": "pnoi_dimokratias_140", "ef_150": "ef_150", "party_151_151": "party_151_151", "party_152_152": "party_152_152", "patriotiki_symmaxia_153": "patriotiki_symmaxia_153", "prasino_mov_155": "prasino_mov_155", "party_156_156": "party_156_156", "spartiates_157": "spartiates_157", "foni_logikis_158": "foni_logikis_158", "party_159_159": "party_159_159", "anex_memon_998": "anex_memon_998"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 332, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 332}, "n_stations_flagged": 332, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:23:55.065635", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.946, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.735, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.573, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.771, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.443, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.644, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.253, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.735, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.807, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.24, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.24, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.798, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 332}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8dbeb32851074027a6fc09a0845f0184", "name": "Barbados 2022 parliamentary (overnight barbados_2022_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Barbados", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.ebc.gov.bb/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Election-Report-2022.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"BLP": "BLP", "DLP": "DLP", "APP": "APP", "SB": "SB", "BFP": "BFP", "NBKA": "NBKA", "BSP": "BSP", "IND": "IND"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 313, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:23:53.723020", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.834, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.765, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.802, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.682, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.05, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.97, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.698, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.484, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.682, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 313}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "04a4904027404081b7f1d74b71d04645", "name": "Grenada 2022 parliamentary (overnight grenada_2022_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Grenada", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "http://www.peogrenada.org/Documents/General%20Election%20Report%202022.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"NDC": "NDC", "NNP": "NNP", "GULP": "GULP", "GRP": "GRP", "IFP": "IFP", "IND": "IND"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 269, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:23:52.649412", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 269}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f7cf4c54489348ab957495f20b02480f", "name": "Dominica 2022 parliamentary (overnight dominica_2022_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominica", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electoraloffice.gov.dm/past-general-elections/2022-general-election-results (per-constituency breakdown JSON at https://electoraloffice.gov.dm/images/json_files/2022/{CONSTIT_ID}_breakdown.json)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"rejected_ballots": "rejected_ballots", "spoilt_ballots": "spoilt_ballots", "DLP": "DLP", "IND": "IND", "TUD": "TUD"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 202, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 181}, "n_stations_flagged": 181, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:23:48.282805", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 202}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d353afdd8a67493387357b6e100bd73f", "name": "Antigua and Barbuda 2023 parliamentary (overnight antigua_barbuda_2023_general.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Antigua and Barbuda", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://abec.gov.ag/election-cycle/election_results/elections_2023/ (per-constituency {code}_pb.php polling-station breakdown pages)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"station_no": "station_no", "ABLP": "ABLP", "UPP": "UPP", "DNA": "DNA", "BPM": "BPM", "IND": "IND"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 188, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 188}, "n_stations_flagged": 188, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:23:47.061102", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 188}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8f649ec4c59649978672acc5fb98303a", "name": "Nepal 2022 house_of_representatives_fptp (overnight nepal_2022_house_of_representatives.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Nepal", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://result.election.gov.np/JSONFiles/ElectionResultCentral2079.txt (Election Commission Nepal 2079/2022 results portal; fetched via Wayback raw https://web.archive.org/web/20230102060018id_/ as the live copy was overwritten with the prior-cycle data)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"district_cd": "district_cd", "constituency_no": "constituency_no", "CPN_Maoist_Centre": "CPN_Maoist_Centre", "CPN_UML": "CPN_UML", "CPN_Unified_Socialist": "CPN_Unified_Socialist", "Federal_Democratic_National_Forum": "Federal_Democratic_National_Forum", "Independent": "Independent", "JSP_Janata_Samajwadi": "JSP_Janata_Samajwadi", "Janamat": "Janamat", "Janasamajwadi": "Janasamajwadi", "LSP_Loktantrik_Samajwadi": "LSP_Loktantrik_Samajwadi", "Nagarik_Unmukti": "Nagarik_Unmukti", "Nepal_Workers_Peasants": "Nepal_Workers_Peasants", "Nepali_Congress": "Nepali_Congress", "RPP": "RPP", "RPP_Nepal": "RPP_Nepal", "RSP_Rastriya_Swatantra": "RSP_Rastriya_Swatantra", "Rastriya_Janamorcha": "Rastriya_Janamorcha", "party_033122": "party_033122", "party_07f0cf": "party_07f0cf", "party_080130": "party_080130", "party_176c7e": "party_176c7e", "party_17be10": "party_17be10", "party_1e9be4": "party_1e9be4", "party_201932": "party_201932", "party_29f4be": "party_29f4be", "party_2a2af1": "party_2a2af1", "party_2b77b7": "party_2b77b7", "party_33c2c5": "party_33c2c5", "party_3708e3": "party_3708e3", "party_3e7413": "party_3e7413", "party_400ff1": "party_400ff1", "party_4f4360": "party_4f4360", "party_4f59fa": "party_4f59fa", "party_58b96a": "party_58b96a", "party_60e19b": "party_60e19b", "party_620924": "party_620924", "party_6ade72": "party_6ade72", "party_6c1355": "party_6c1355", "party_7ac30b": "party_7ac30b", "party_7d27ea": "party_7d27ea", "party_885e8b": "party_885e8b", "party_8ba200": "party_8ba200", "party_8f6332": "party_8f6332", "party_928e0c": "party_928e0c", "party_982c57": "party_982c57", "party_a03167": "party_a03167", "party_a51369": "party_a51369", "party_a78ee1": "party_a78ee1", "party_ac97b2": "party_ac97b2", "party_b52b59": "party_b52b59", "party_b6f3fe": "party_b6f3fe", "party_b84f04": "party_b84f04", "party_b8aca3": "party_b8aca3", "party_d6388d": "party_d6388d", "party_d9cb54": "party_d9cb54", "party_e24c40": "party_e24c40", "party_e75ccf": "party_e75ccf", "party_edbb82": "party_edbb82", "party_edc1c2": "party_edc1c2", "party_f23993": "party_f23993", "party_f81731": "party_f81731", "party_f8bd18": "party_f8bd18", "party_ff0bfe": "party_ff0bfe"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 165, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 165, "cast_gt_registered": 165, "votes_gt_valid": 165}, "n_stations_flagged": 165, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:23:38.900383", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.502, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.705, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.631, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.501, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.502, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.705, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.151, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.181, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.836, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.626, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.501, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.501, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.412, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.773, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.773, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.613, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.613, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 165}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ad09d1ae882f46bb959c2d19b3ba7282", "name": "Zambia 2021 presidential (overnight zambia_2021_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Zambia", "year": 2021, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.elections.org.zm/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/2021-PresidentialResultsPerConst.pdf (via Wayback 20240529142419id_)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"party_UPND": "party_UPND", "party_PF": "party_PF", "party_SP": "party_SP", "party_PNUP": "party_PNUP", "party_DP": "party_DP", "party_PAC": "party_PAC", "party_NHP": "party_NHP", "party_MMD": "party_MMD", "party_UPPZ": "party_UPPZ", "party_NAREP": "party_NAREP", "party_UNIP": "party_UNIP", "party_3RD_LM": "party_3RD_LM", "party_PEP": "party_PEP", "party_ZUSD": "party_ZUSD", "party_EFF": "party_EFF", "party_LM": "party_LM"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 156, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:23:37.717161", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.663, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.428, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.421, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.339, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.879, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.47, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.154, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.61, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.421, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.339, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.339, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.274, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.274, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.676, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 156}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "47ed42297d7f4c858a1a11f79fdc6c1d", "name": "Luxembourg 2023 parliamentary (overnight luxembourg_2023_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Luxembourg", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.public.lu/en/datasets/elections-legislatives-2023-donnees-officieuses/ (file leg-2023-10-08-22-57-35-939.xml, https://download.data.public.lu/resources/elections-legislatives-2023-donnees-officieuses/20231009-102942/leg-2023-10-08-22-57-35-939.xml)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_LSAP": "votes_LSAP", "votes_DP": "votes_DP", "votes_dei_greng": "votes_dei_greng", "votes_CSV": "votes_CSV", "votes_dei_Lenk": "votes_dei_Lenk", "votes_ADR": "votes_ADR", "votes_PIRATEN": "votes_PIRATEN", "votes_FOKUS": "votes_FOKUS", "votes_KPL": "votes_KPL", "votes_LIBERTE-FRIHEET": "votes_LIBERTE-FRIHEET", "votes_VOLT": "votes_VOLT", "votes_dei_Konservativ": "votes_dei_Konservativ"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 100, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 100, "cast_gt_registered": 98, "votes_gt_valid": 100}, "n_stations_flagged": 100, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:23:15.396655", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.785, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.898, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.871, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.789, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.785, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.898, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.872, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.468, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.807, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.026, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 100}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8727a97a5cff404e89fbdb52f2275ac6", "name": "Morocco 2021 parliamentary (overnight morocco_2021_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Morocco", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://medias24.com/content/uploads/1970/01/01/resultats_legislatives_2021_details_et_nombre_de_voix.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"circonscription_seq": "circonscription_seq", "seats_won_total": "seats_won_total", "party_AFG": "party_AFG", "party_AHD": "party_AHD", "party_Al_Amal": "party_Al_Amal", "party_Al_Insaf": "party_Al_Insaf", "party_FFD": "party_FFD", "party_MDS": "party_MDS", "party_MP": "party_MP", "party_NEO": "party_NEO", "party_PA": "party_PA", "party_PAM": "party_PAM", "party_PAN": "party_PAN", "party_PCS": "party_PCS", "party_PDI": "party_PDI", "party_PDN": "party_PDN", "party_PEDD": "party_PEDD", "party_PI": "party_PI", "party_PJD": "party_PJD", "party_PLJS": "party_PLJS", "party_PML": "party_PML", "party_PPS": "party_PPS", "party_PRD": "party_PRD", "party_PRV": "party_PRV", "party_PSD": "party_PSD", "party_PSU": "party_PSU", "party_PUD": "party_PUD", "party_PVM": "party_PVM", "party_RNI": "party_RNI", "party_UC": "party_UC", "party_UMD": "party_UMD", "party_USFP": "party_USFP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 90, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 90, "registered_not_positive": 90, "cast_gt_registered": 90}, "n_stations_flagged": 90, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:23:14.505023", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.137, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.764, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.261, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.24, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.764, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.7, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.7, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.425, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.565, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.391, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.217, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.159, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.261, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.261, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.24, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.24, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.203, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.203, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.636, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.636, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.583, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.583, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 90}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5b7292bb555349a29f43ec5eb03ff814", "name": "Slovenia 2022 parliamentary (overnight slovenia_2022_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Slovenia", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://volitve.dvk-rs.si/data/data.json (DVK-RS official, 2022 National Assembly; via Wayback 20220517 id_ raw)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"DeSUS": "DeSUS", "DOM": "DOM", "Resni_ca": "Resni_ca", "SVOBODA": "SVOBODA", "ZSi": "ZSi", "LEVICA": "LEVICA", "L'BP": "L'BP", "LM\u0160": "LM\u0160", "NA\u0160A DE\u017dELA": "NA\u0160A DE\u017dELA", "SNP-DD": "SNP-DD", "NESTRANKARSKA": "NESTRANKARSKA", "NSi": "NSi", "Pirati": "Pirati", "POVE\u017dIMO": "POVE\u017dIMO", "SDS": "SDS", "SNS": "SNS", "SD": "SD", "SAB": "SAB", "VESNA": "VESNA", "ZLS": "ZLS", "ZOS": "ZOS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 88, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:23:13.598714", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.839, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.914, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.808, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.728, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.839, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.722, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.112, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.548, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.744, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.705, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.705, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.928, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.095, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.095, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 88}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e7f434d7fb29400f8bc95fcb29fbbded", "name": "Lesotho 2022 parliamentary (overnight lesotho_2022_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Lesotho", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://iec.org.ls/2022-results/ (per-constituency PDFs, wpdmdl 9795-9949)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"constituency_no": "constituency_no", "objected": "objected", "turnout_pct": "turnout_pct", "AA": "AA", "ABC": "ABC", "AD": "AD", "AFM": "AFM", "APC": "APC", "AUM": "AUM", "BANC": "BANC", "BAP": "BAP", "BCEF": "BCEF", "BCM": "BCM", "BCP": "BCP", "BDC": "BDC", "BDNP": "BDNP", "BEE": "BEE", "BLM": "BLM", "BNP": "BNP", "BPP": "BPP", "BPSP": "BPSP", "BRP": "BRP", "BSP": "BSP", "BTLC": "BTLC", "BTM": "BTM", "BTS": "BTS", "CFM": "CFM", "CNC": "CNC", "DC": "DC", "DPA": "DPA", "EMB": "EMB", "HOPE": "HOPE", "IND": "IND", "KB": "KB", "LCD": "LCD", "LEFF": "LEFF", "LMM": "LMM", "LPC": "LPC", "MEC": "MEC", "METSI": "METSI", "MFP": "MFP", "MPS": "MPS", "MTF": "MTF", "NIP": "NIP", "PC": "PC", "PFD": "PFD", "PSL": "PSL", "RAD": "RAD", "RCL": "RCL", "RFP": "RFP", "SR": "SR", "TEB": "TEB", "TSD": "TSD", "UFC": "UFC", "YES": "YES", "YONA": "YONA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 80, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 80}, "n_stations_flagged": 80, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:23:05.721827", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.63, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.924, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.648, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.509, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.63, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.924, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.025, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.49, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.334, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.648, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.509, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.509, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.515, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.515, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.787, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.534, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 80}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "903aaeb0fd484590adf32b8ddc4b9ed5", "name": "Greenland 2025 parliamentary (overnight greenland_2025_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Greenland", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://qinersineq.gl/results (Parliament Election 2025, per Polling Station, Party view)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Atassut": "Atassut", "Democrats": "Democrats", "Inuit Ataqatigiit": "Inuit Ataqatigiit", "Naleraq": "Naleraq", "Qulleq": "Qulleq", "Siumut": "Siumut"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 72, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 72, "cast_gt_registered": 72}, "n_stations_flagged": 72, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:23:04.713666", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 72}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9ca6238eabcb4c1eabbcaeca3eb8f729", "name": "Suriname 2020 parliamentary (overnight suriname_2020_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Suriname", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://chs.gov.sr/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/verkiezings-verslag-CHS-2020_compressed.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"district_no": "district_no", "party_VHP": "party_VHP", "party_NDP": "party_NDP", "party_NPS": "party_NPS", "party_ABOP": "party_ABOP", "party_PL": "party_PL", "party_HVB": "party_HVB", "party_BEP": "party_BEP", "party_A20": "party_A20", "party_DOE": "party_DOE", "party_PRO": "party_PRO", "party_PALU": "party_PALU", "party_SPA": "party_SPA", "party_STREI": "party_STREI", "party_DA91": "party_DA91", "party_VVD": "party_VVD", "party_SDU": "party_SDU", "party_DNW": "party_DNW"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 62, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 62}, "n_stations_flagged": 62, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:23:04.004028", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.792, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.764, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.754, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.628, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.792, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.764, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.641, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.28, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.116, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.293, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.446, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.754, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.628, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.2, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.2, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 62}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "16e522c17a70469b89006bdd36176155", "name": "Botswana 2024 parliamentary (national assembly) (overnight botswana_2024_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Botswana", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Botswana_general_election", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"BDP": "BDP", "UDC": "UDC", "BCP": "BCP", "BPF": "BPF", "Ind": "Ind", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 61, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:22:56.240382", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.792, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.595, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.47, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.792, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.901, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.016, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.698, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.076, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.269, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.595, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.595, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.47, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.47, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.432, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.432, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.242, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.242, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 61}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2e30cddb5db04aea80f2885a433d7002", "name": "Algeria 2024 presidential (overnight algeria_2024_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Algeria", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.joradp.dz/FTP/jo-arabe/2024/A2024063.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"wilaya_code": "wilaya_code", "polling_offices": "polling_offices", "participation_pct": "participation_pct", "Tebboune_Independent": "Tebboune_Independent", "Hassani_Cherif_MSP": "Hassani_Cherif_MSP", "Aouchiche_FFS": "Aouchiche_FFS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 59, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 59}, "n_stations_flagged": 59, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:22:55.643394", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.405, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.951, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.26, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.123, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.405, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.701, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.425, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.051, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.263, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.023, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.149, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.26, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.26, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.123, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.123, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.24, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.24, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.418, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.418, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.133, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.133, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.662, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.662, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.348, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.348, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 59}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7e82689b95b54cd3bca166413f8d44b5", "name": "Faroe Islands 2022 parliamentary (overnight faroe_2022_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Faroe Islands", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://api.valurslit.fo/ElectionDetailView/340 (official Val\u00farslit API, electionId=340; frontend https://valurslit.fo)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"A_F\u00f3lkaflokkurin": "A_F\u00f3lkaflokkurin", "B_Sambandsflokkurin": "B_Sambandsflokkurin", "C_Javna\u00f0arflokkurin": "C_Javna\u00f0arflokkurin", "D_Sj\u00e1lvst\u00fdri": "D_Sj\u00e1lvst\u00fdri", "E_Tj\u00f3\u00f0veldi": "E_Tj\u00f3\u00f0veldi", "F_Frams\u00f3kn": "F_Frams\u00f3kn", "H_Mi\u00f0flokkurin": "H_Mi\u00f0flokkurin"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 57, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 26}, "n_stations_flagged": 26, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:22:54.477718", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 57}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "50b6ad25d8b94750b61b43a9a713cbc2", "name": "Senegal 2024 presidential (overnight senegal_2024_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Senegal", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://cadakar.org/download/1534/?tmstv=1713244969", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"nbre_bureaux": "nbre_bureaux", "Boubacar Camara": "Boubacar Camara", "Cheikh Tidiane Dieye": "Cheikh Tidiane Dieye", "Dethie Fall": "Dethie Fall", "Daouda Ndiaye": "Daouda Ndiaye", "Habib Sy": "Habib Sy", "Khalifa Ababacar Sall": "Khalifa Ababacar Sall", "Anta Babacar Ngom": "Anta Babacar Ngom", "Amadou Ba": "Amadou Ba", "Idrissa Seck": "Idrissa Seck", "Aliou Mamadou Dia": "Aliou Mamadou Dia", "Serigne Mboup": "Serigne Mboup", "Pape Djibril Fall": "Pape Djibril Fall", "Mamadou Lamine Diallo": "Mamadou Lamine Diallo", "Mahammed Boun Abdallah Dionne": "Mahammed Boun Abdallah Dionne", "Malick Gakou": "Malick Gakou", "Aly Ngouille Ndiaye": "Aly Ngouille Ndiaye", "El Hadji Mamadou Diao": "El Hadji Mamadou Diao", "Bassirou Diomaye Faye": "Bassirou Diomaye Faye", "Thierno Alassane Sall": "Thierno Alassane Sall"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 54, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 54}, "n_stations_flagged": 54, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:22:53.793088", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.487, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.605, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.605, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.461, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.487, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.605, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.424, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.153, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.966, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.51, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.378, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.461, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.461, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.443, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.674, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 54}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "029951a0946a47c3a534bf197fe9702c", "name": "Gambia 2022 parliamentary (overnight gambia_2022_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Gambia", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://iec.gm/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/RESULTS-OF-NATIONAL-ASSEMBLY-ELECTIONS-9th.-APRIL-2022.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"APP": "APP", "APRC": "APRC", "CA": "CA", "GDC": "GDC", "GFA": "GFA", "GMC": "GMC", "INDEPENDENT": "INDEPENDENT", "NPP": "NPP", "NRP": "NRP", "NUP": "NUP", "PDOIS": "PDOIS", "PPP": "PPP", "UDP": "UDP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 53, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 53, "registered_not_positive": 53}, "n_stations_flagged": 53, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:22:53.199489", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 53}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9a9b962ced6f4af8be35602cda076f2b", "name": "Samoa 2021 parliamentary (overnight samoa_2021_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Samoa", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.oec.gov.ws/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/GE2021-Report-Eng.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"n_candidates": "n_candidates", "winner_votes": "winner_votes", "uncontested": "uncontested", "HRPP": "HRPP", "FAST": "FAST", "Tautua": "Tautua", "SamoaFirst": "SamoaFirst", "Independent": "Independent", "SIS": "SIS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 48, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 48}, "n_stations_flagged": 48, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:22:52.568058", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 48}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "81965ac822b9414b8669ae090b6467a5", "name": "Solomon Islands 2024 parliamentary (overnight solomon_islands_2024_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Solomon Islands", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://siec.gov.sb/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Gaz-No.-70-Tuesday-30th-April-2024.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"n_candidates": "n_candidates", "winner_votes": "winner_votes", "cand01_votes": "cand01_votes", "cand02_votes": "cand02_votes", "cand03_votes": "cand03_votes", "cand04_votes": "cand04_votes", "cand05_votes": "cand05_votes", "cand06_votes": "cand06_votes", "cand07_votes": "cand07_votes", "cand08_votes": "cand08_votes", "cand09_votes": "cand09_votes", "cand10_votes": "cand10_votes", "cand11_votes": "cand11_votes", "cand12_votes": "cand12_votes", "cand13_votes": "cand13_votes", "cand14_votes": "cand14_votes", "cand15_votes": "cand15_votes", "cand16_votes": "cand16_votes", "cand17_votes": "cand17_votes"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 50, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 4, "votes_gt_valid": 50}, "n_stations_flagged": 50, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:22:51.972342", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.477, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.834, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.688, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.536, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.477, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.869, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.697, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.384, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.688, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.536, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.536, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.433, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.433, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.602, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 50}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b4ec2fb968f9477c920002bcf9ce29ad", "name": "Ireland 2024 parliamentary (overnight ireland_2024_general.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Ireland", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/electoralProcess/electionResults/dail/2025/2025-04-02_34th-dail-general-election-results_en.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Callaghan, Catherine (FG)": "Callaghan, Catherine (FG)", "Cleere, Peter 'Chap' (FF)": "Cleere, Peter 'Chap' (FF)", "Donohoe, Orla (IFP)": "Donohoe, Orla (IFP)", "Doyle, Michael (FG)": "Doyle, Michael (FG)", "Egan, David (LR)": "Egan, David (LR)", "Fitzgerald, David (FG)": "Fitzgerald, David (FG)", "Gladney Knox, \u00c1ine (SF)": "Gladney Knox, \u00c1ine (SF)", "Healy, Tom (Non-P)": "Healy, Tom (Non-P)", "McGuinness, Eugene (Non-P)": "McGuinness, Eugene (Non-P)", "McGuinness, John (FF)": "McGuinness, John (FF)", "Murnane O'Connor, Jennifer (FF)": "Murnane O'Connor, Jennifer (FF)", "Newsome Drennan, Natasha (SF)": "Newsome Drennan, Natasha (SF)", "Noonan, Malcolm (Grn)": "Noonan, Malcolm (Grn)", "O'Connor, Luke (Non-P)": "O'Connor, Luke (Non-P)", "\u00d3 hArg\u00e1in, Se\u00e1n (Lab)": "\u00d3 hArg\u00e1in, Se\u00e1n (Lab)", "O'Leary, John (Non-P)": "O'Leary, John (Non-P)", "O'Neill, Gary (Ant)": "O'Neill, Gary (Ant)", "Stephenson, Patricia (SD)": "Stephenson, Patricia (SD)", "Wallace, Adrienne (PBP)": "Wallace, Adrienne (PBP)", "Walsh, Noel G (Non-P)": "Walsh, Noel G (Non-P)", "Bennett, Cathy (SF)": "Bennett, Cathy (SF)", "Brady, Carmel (FG)": "Brady, Carmel (FG)", "Carthy, Matt (SF)": "Carthy, Matt (SF)", "Deery, Feargal Joseph (Non-P)": "Deery, Feargal Joseph (Non-P)", "Duffy, Joseph (Non-P)": "Duffy, Joseph (Non-P)", "Gallagher, Robbie (FF)": "Gallagher, Robbie (FF)", "Gordon, Lester James (Non-P)": "Gordon, Lester James (Non-P)", "Hendrick, Emma (PBP)": "Hendrick, Emma (PBP)", "Martin, Val (IFP)": "Martin, Val (IFP)", "Maxwell, David (FG)": "Maxwell, David (FG)", "Mee, Jimmy Stavrous (Non-P)": "Mee, Jimmy Stavrous (Non-P)", "Moore, Mark (TNP)": "Moore, Mark (TNP)", "Mulligan, Shane (LR)": "Mulligan, Shane (LR)", "O'Gara, Eddie (Grn)": "O'Gara, Eddie (Grn)", "O'Reilly, Sarah (Ant)": "O'Reilly, Sarah (Ant)", "O'Reilly, Shane P (Ind I )": "O'Reilly, Shane P (Ind I )", "O'Reilly, T P (FG)": "O'Reilly, T P (FG)", "Smith, Brendan (FF)": "Smith, Brendan (FF)", "Smyth, Niamh (FF)": "Smyth, Niamh (FF)", "Tully, Pauline (SF)": "Tully, Pauline (SF)", "Carey, Leonora (FG)": "Carey, Leonora (FG)", "Cooney, Joe (FG)": "Cooney, Joe (FG)", "Crowe, Cathal (FF)": "Crowe, Cathal (FF)", "Dillon, June (Ant)": "Dillon, June (Ant)", "Dooley, Timmy (FF)": "Dooley, Timmy (FF)", "Garvey, R\u00f3is\u00edn (Grn)": "Garvey, R\u00f3is\u00edn (Grn)", "Hassett, Kevin (Non-P)": "Hassett, Kevin (Non-P)", "Leahy, Michael (IFP)": "Leahy, Michael (IFP)", "Loughrey, Michael (TIP)": "Loughrey, Michael (TIP)", "Major, Amanda (Non-P)": "Major, Amanda (Non-P)", "McGettigan, Donna (SF)": "McGettigan, Donna (SF)", "McInerney, Rita (FF)": "McInerney, Rita (FF)", "Moroney, Matthew (Non-P)": "Moroney, Matthew (Non-P)", "Murphy, Paddy (Non-P)": "Murphy, Paddy (Non-P)", "N\u00ed Chath\u00e1in, Caitr\u00edona (PBP)": "N\u00ed Chath\u00e1in, Caitr\u00edona (PBP)", "Nolan, Tom (FG)": "Nolan, Tom (FG)", "O'Donovan, Barry (RML)": "O'Donovan, Barry (RML)", "Punch, Eddie (Ind I )": "Punch, Eddie (Ind I )", "Tonge, Hilary (SD)": "Tonge, Hilary (SD)", "Wynne, Violet-Anne (Non-P)": "Wynne, Violet-Anne (Non-P)", "Bermingham, Kathryn (Ind I )": "Bermingham, Kathryn (Ind I )", "Buckley, Pat (SF)": "Buckley, Pat (SF)", "Cannon, Ross (Non-P)": "Cannon, Ross (Non-P)", "Linehan Foley, Mary (Non-P)": "Linehan Foley, Mary (Non-P)", "Lynch, Catherine (Ind I )": "Lynch, Catherine (Ind I )", "Mc Carthy, Noel (FG)": "Mc Carthy, Noel (FG)", "n\u00ed Fhinn, Asch (PBP)": "n\u00ed Fhinn, Asch (PBP)", "O'Brien, Deirdre (FF)": "O'Brien, Deirdre (FF)", "O'Connor, James (FF)": "O'Connor, James (FF)", "O'Halloran, Cl\u00edona (Grn)": "O'Halloran, Cl\u00edona (Grn)", "O'Leary, William (Non-P)": "O'Leary, William (Non-P)", "O'Sullivan, James-Peter (TIP)": "O'Sullivan, James-Peter (TIP)", "Ozcinar, Medhi (SF)": "Ozcinar, Medhi (SF)", "Quaide, Liam (SD)": "Quaide, Liam (SD)", "Roche, Frank (Non-P)": "Roche, Frank (Non-P)", "Stanton, Mark (FG)": "Stanton, Mark (FG)", "Stromsoe, Mona (Ant)": "Stromsoe, Mona (Ant)", "Barry, Mick (PBP)": "Barry, Mick (PBP)", "Blighe, Derek (IF)": "Blighe, Derek (IF)", "Burke, Colm (FG)": "Burke, Colm (FG)", "Condon, Martin (Non-P)": "Condon, Martin (Non-P)", "Daly, Imelda (FG)": "Daly, Imelda (FG)", "Donohoe, John (Non-P)": "Donohoe, John (Non-P)", "Doyle, Susan (SD)": "Doyle, Susan (SD)", "Fitzgerald, Tony (FF)": "Fitzgerald, Tony (FF)", "Gould, Thomas (SF)": "Gould, Thomas (SF)", "Hurley Roche, Rachel (Non-P)": "Hurley Roche, Rachel (Non-P)", "Kelleher, Garret (FG)": "Kelleher, Garret (FG)", "Kenny, Eoghan (Lab)": "Kenny, Eoghan (Lab)", "Lynch, Joe (SF)": "Lynch, Joe (SF)", "Maher, John (Lab)": "Maher, John (Lab)", "McCarthy, Ciaran (SD)": "McCarthy, Ciaran (SD)", "Moran, Oliver (Grn)": "Moran, Oliver (Grn)", "Murphy Kelleher, Sandra (FF)": "Murphy Kelleher, Sandra (FF)", "O'Flynn, Ken (Ind I )": "O'Flynn, Ken (Ind I )", "O'Sullivan, Padraig (FF)": "O'Sullivan, Padraig (FF)", "Peters, Joseph (Non-P)": "Peters, Joseph (Non-P)", "Toomey, Finian (Ant)": "Toomey, Finian (Ant)", "Barry, Ellen (Ind I )": "Barry, Ellen (Ind I )", "Creed, Michael (FG)": "Creed, Michael (FG)", "Finn, Colette (Grn)": "Finn, Colette (Grn)", "Kealy, Becky (Ant)": "Kealy, Becky (Ant)", "Moore, Joe (PBP)": "Moore, Joe (PBP)", "Moynihan, Aindrias (FF)": "Moynihan, Aindrias (FF)", "Moynihan, Michael (FF)": "Moynihan, Michael (FF)", "O'Shea, John Paul (FG)": "O'Shea, John Paul (FG)", "Ryan, Nicole (SF)": "Ryan, Nicole (SF)", "Ryan-Purcell, Walter (Non-P)": "Ryan-Purcell, Walter (Non-P)", "Bogue, Lorna (RML)": "Bogue, Lorna (RML)", "Buttimer, Jerry (FG)": "Buttimer, Jerry (FG)", "Cowhey Shahid, Michelle (SF)": "Cowhey Shahid, Michelle (SF)", "Daly, Anna (Ant)": "Daly, Anna (Ant)", "Dineen, Paudie (Non-P)": "Dineen, Paudie (Non-P)", "Field, Tony (Non-P)": "Field, Tony (Non-P)", "Finn, Mick (Non-P)": "Finn, Mick (Non-P)", "Harmon, Laura (Lab)": "Harmon, Laura (Lab)", "Houlihan, Veronica (Ind I )": "Houlihan, Veronica (Ind I )", "Kenneally, Margaret (FF)": "Kenneally, Margaret (FF)", "Laird, Shane Patrick (PBP)": "Laird, Shane Patrick (PBP)", "Martin, Miche\u00e1l (FF)": "Martin, Miche\u00e1l (FF)", "McCarthy, Una (FG)": "McCarthy, Una (FG)", "McGrath, Seamus (FF)": "McGrath, Seamus (FF)", "Neville, Ted (TNP)": "Neville, Ted (TNP)", "O'Callaghan, Shane (FG)": "O'Callaghan, Shane (FG)", "Oikeh, Monica (Grn)": "Oikeh, Monica (Grn)", "O\u2019Laoghaire, Donnchadh (SF)": "O\u2019Laoghaire, Donnchadh (SF)", "Rice, Padraig (SD)": "Rice, Padraig (SD)", "Ward, Valerie (Ind I )": "Ward, Valerie (Ind I )", "Cairns, Holly (SD)": "Cairns, Holly (SD)", "Coleman, Alan (Non-P)": "Coleman, Alan (Non-P)", "Collins, Michael (Ind I )": "Collins, Michael (Ind I )", "Laplaud, Zo\u00eb (PBP)": "Laplaud, Zo\u00eb (PBP)", "Lombard, Tim (FG)": "Lombard, Tim (FG)", "Nevin, Evie (Lab)": "Nevin, Evie (Lab)", "O'Callaghan, Clare (SF)": "O'Callaghan, Clare (SF)", "O'Donovan, Noel (FG)": "O'Donovan, Noel (FG)", "\u00d3 Seaghdha, Donnchadh (SF)": "\u00d3 Seaghdha, Donnchadh (SF)", "O'Sullivan, Christopher (FF)": "O'Sullivan, Christopher (FF)", "Ruane, M\u00e1ir\u00e9ad (Ant)": "Ruane, M\u00e1ir\u00e9ad (Ant)", "Ryder, Mary (Grn)": "Ryder, Mary (Grn)", "Bradley, Nikki (FG)": "Bradley, Nikki (FG)", "Bradley, Vincent J (Non-P)": "Bradley, Vincent J (Non-P)", "Carr, Nuala (Grn)": "Carr, Nuala (Grn)", "Doherty, Pearse (SF)": "Doherty, Pearse (SF)", "Gallagher, Carol (PBP)": "Gallagher, Carol (PBP)", "Gallagher, Pat \u2018The Cope\u2019 (FF)": "Gallagher, Pat \u2018The Cope\u2019 (FF)", "Jordan, Noel (SF)": "Jordan, Noel (SF)", "KENNEDY, Claudia (FF)": "KENNEDY, Claudia (FF)", "Mac Lochlainn, P\u00e1draig (SF)": "Mac Lochlainn, P\u00e1draig (SF)", "McConalogue, Charlie (FF)": "McConalogue, Charlie (FF)", "McConnell, Niall (Non-P)": "McConnell, Niall (Non-P)", "McGee, Eamon (IFP)": "McGee, Eamon (IFP)", "Mc Guinness, Arthur Desmond (Non-P)": "Mc Guinness, Arthur Desmond (Non-P)", "Mc Keever, Gerry (Non-P)": "Mc Keever, Gerry (Non-P)", "Mc Menamin, Kim (TIP)": "Mc Menamin, Kim (TIP)", "Mc Nulty, John (FG)": "Mc Nulty, John (FG)", "O' Donnell, Frank (Non-P)": "O' Donnell, Frank (Non-P)", "Pringle, Thomas (Non-P)": "Pringle, Thomas (Non-P)", "Sweeney, Mary T (Ant)": "Sweeney, Mary T (Ant)", "Ward, Charles (100% R)": "Ward, Charles (100% R)", "Brabazon, Tom (FF)": "Brabazon, Tom (FF)", "Burke, Michael (Non-P)": "Burke, Michael (Non-P)", "Coyle, Kevin (Non-P)": "Coyle, Kevin (Non-P)", "Fitzsimons, Paul Christopher (IFP)": "Fitzsimons, Paul Christopher (IFP)", "Folan, Shane (Lab)": "Folan, Shane (Lab)", "Garrigan, Brian (Non-P)": "Garrigan, Brian (Non-P)", "Healy, David (Grn)": "Healy, David (Grn)", "Heneghan, Barry (Non-P)": "Heneghan, Barry (Non-P)", "Heney, Deirdre (FF)": "Heney, Deirdre (FF)", "Lyons, John (Non-P)": "Lyons, John (Non-P)", "Mac Donncha, M\u00edche\u00e1l (SF)": "Mac Donncha, M\u00edche\u00e1l (SF)", "Mitchell, Denise (SF)": "Mitchell, Denise (SF)", "Morris, James (Ant)": "Morris, James (Ant)", "Mulvany, Bernard (PBP)": "Mulvany, Bernard (PBP)", "O'Callaghan, Cian (SD)": "O'Callaghan, Cian (SD)", "\u00d3 Conar\u00e1in, Diarmaid (Non-P)": "\u00d3 Conar\u00e1in, Diarmaid (Non-P)", "\u00d3 Muir\u00ed, Naoise (FG)": "\u00d3 Muir\u00ed, Naoise (FG)", "Tormey, Aoibhinn (FG)": "Tormey, Aoibhinn (FG)", "Andrews, Chris (SF)": "Andrews, Chris (SF)", "Bacik, Ivana (Lab)": "Bacik, Ivana (Lab)", "Blain, Emma (FG)": "Blain, Emma (FG)", "Chu, Hazel (Grn)": "Chu, Hazel (Grn)", "Delehanty, Nick (Non-P)": "Delehanty, Nick (Non-P)", "Dooley, Peter (Non-P)": "Dooley, Peter (Non-P)", "Doyle, Lauralee (TIP)": "Doyle, Lauralee (TIP)", "Flynn, Mannix (Non-P)": "Flynn, Mannix (Non-P)", "Geoghegan, James (FG)": "Geoghegan, James (FG)", "Hayes, Eoin (SD)": "Hayes, Eoin (SD)", "Healy, Alan (Ant)": "Healy, Alan (Ant)", "Hennessy, David (Non-P)": "Hennessy, David (Non-P)", "Keigher, John Dominic (Non-P)": "Keigher, John Dominic (Non-P)", "O'Callaghan, Jim (FF)": "O'Callaghan, Jim (FF)", "O'Connell, Kate (Non-P)": "O'Connell, Kate (Non-P)", "Pocock, Daniel (Non-P)": "Pocock, Daniel (Non-P)", "Purcell, Brigid (PBP)": "Purcell, Brigid (PBP)", "Boylan, Janice (SF)": "Boylan, Janice (SF)", "Daly, Clare (I4C)": "Daly, Clare (I4C)", "Donohoe, Paschal (FG)": "Donohoe, Paschal (FG)", "Fitzpatrick, Mary (FF)": "Fitzpatrick, Mary (FF)", "Gannon, Gary (SD)": "Gannon, Gary (SD)", "Hourigan, Neasa (Grn)": "Hourigan, Neasa (Grn)", "Hutch, Gerard (Non-P)": "Hutch, Gerard (Non-P)", "Kelly, Andrew (CPOI)": "Kelly, Andrew (CPOI)", "McDonald, Mary Lou (SF)": "McDonald, Mary Lou (SF)", "\u00d3 Ceannabh\u00e1in, Eoghan (PBP)": "\u00d3 Ceannabh\u00e1in, Eoghan (PBP)", "Sherlock, Marie (Lab)": "Sherlock, Marie (Lab)", "Smyth, Ian Noel (Ant)": "Smyth, Ian Noel (Ant)", "Steenson, Malachy (Non-P)": "Steenson, Malachy (Non-P)", "Byrne, Victoria (IFP)": "Byrne, Victoria (IFP)", "Carey, Ian (Grn)": "Carey, Ian (Grn)", "Devi, Manju (FF)": "Devi, Manju (FF)", "Donnelly, Tony 'Theo' (Non-P)": "Donnelly, Tony 'Theo' (Non-P)", "Farrell, Alan (FG)": "Farrell, Alan (FG)", "Gilroy, Ben (LR)": "Gilroy, Ben (LR)", "Graves, Ann (SF)": "Graves, Ann (SF)", "Hopkins, Joan (SD)": "Hopkins, Joan (SD)", "Kelly, Darren Jack (Non-P)": "Kelly, Darren Jack (Non-P)", "Mc Govern, Margaret (Ant)": "Mc Govern, Margaret (Ant)", "Mulligan, Dean (I4C)": "Mulligan, Dean (I4C)", "O'Brien, Darragh (FF)": "O'Brien, Darragh (FF)", "O Connell, Fergal (Non-P)": "O Connell, Fergal (Non-P)", "Power, Ollie (PBP)": "Power, Ollie (PBP)", "Smith, Duncan (Lab)": "Smith, Duncan (Lab)", "Boland, Grace (FG)": "Boland, Grace (FG)", "Clifford-Lee, Lorraine (FF)": "Clifford-Lee, Lorraine (FF)", "Edwards, Bryn (PBP)": "Edwards, Bryn (PBP)", "Loughlin, Robbie (Ant)": "Loughlin, Robbie (Ant)", "Murphy, Tony (Non-P)": "Murphy, Tony (Non-P)", "Oakes, John (IFP)": "Oakes, John (IFP)", "O'Brien, Joe (Grn)": "O'Brien, Joe (Grn)", "O'Donoghue, Robert (Lab)": "O'Donoghue, Robert (Lab)", "O'Reilly, Louise (SF)": "O'Reilly, Louise (SF)", "Parsons, Mark Joseph (TIP)": "Parsons, Mark Joseph (TIP)", "Uwhumiakpor, Oghenetano John (Non-P)": "Uwhumiakpor, Oghenetano John (Non-P)", "Casserly, Vicki (FG)": "Casserly, Vicki (FG)", "Coyle, Robert (TIP)": "Coyle, Robert (TIP)", "de Courcy, Linda (Ind I )": "de Courcy, Linda (Ind I )", "Doran, Karla (Grn)": "Doran, Karla (Grn)", "Gogarty, Paul Nicholas (Non-P)": "Gogarty, Paul Nicholas (Non-P)", "Hayes, Alan (Non-P)": "Hayes, Alan (Non-P)", "Higgins, Emer (FG)": "Higgins, Emer (FG)", "Kenny, Gino (PBP)": "Kenny, Gino (PBP)", "Moore, Glen (IFP)": "Moore, Glen (IFP)", "Moynihan, Shane (FF)": "Moynihan, Shane (FF)", "\u00d3 Broin, Eoin (SF)": "\u00d3 Broin, Eoin (SF)", "\u00d3 Broin, Eoin (SD)": "\u00d3 Broin, Eoin (SD)", "\u00d3 Coist\u00edn, Sean\u00e1n (Non-P)": "\u00d3 Coist\u00edn, Sean\u00e1n (Non-P)", "Prendergast, Lynda (FF)": "Prendergast, Lynda (FF)", "Quinn, Colm (Ant)": "Quinn, Colm (Ant)", "Timmons, Francis (Lab)": "Timmons, Francis (Lab)", "Ward, Mark (SF)": "Ward, Mark (SF)", "Carney Boud, Cathleen (SF)": "Carney Boud, Cathleen (SF)", "Conroy, Caroline (Grn)": "Conroy, Caroline (Grn)", "Croft, Ian (CPOI)": "Croft, Ian (CPOI)", "Ellis, Dessie (SF)": "Ellis, Dessie (SF)", "Hearne, Rory (SD)": "Hearne, Rory (SD)", "Mac Dubhghlais, Diarmuid (Non-P)": "Mac Dubhghlais, Diarmuid (Non-P)", "MacManus, Edward (Ant)": "MacManus, Edward (Ant)", "McAuliffe, Paul (FF)": "McAuliffe, Paul (FF)", "Nisbet, John (Lab)": "Nisbet, John (Lab)", "Pepper, Gavin (Non-P)": "Pepper, Gavin (Non-P)", "Reddy, Conor (PBP)": "Reddy, Conor (PBP)", "Redmond, Stephen (TNP)": "Redmond, Stephen (TNP)", "Rock, Noel (FG)": "Rock, Noel (FG)", "Brennan, Shay (FF)": "Brennan, Shay (FF)", "Coughlan, Liam (Ant)": "Coughlan, Liam (Ant)", "Daly, Kevin (Non-P)": "Daly, Kevin (Non-P)", "Dunne, Elaine Mary (FF)": "Dunne, Elaine Mary (FF)", "Fleming, Michael (Non-P)": "Fleming, Michael (Non-P)", "Gibney, Sin\u00e9ad (SD)": "Gibney, Sin\u00e9ad (SD)", "Martin, Catherine (Grn)": "Martin, Catherine (Grn)", "McCafferty, Garrett (TNP)": "McCafferty, Garrett (TNP)", "McCarthy, Lettie (Lab)": "McCarthy, Lettie (Lab)", "Murphy, Conor (Non-P)": "Murphy, Conor (Non-P)", "N\u00ed Aonghusa, S\u00edomha (PBP)": "N\u00ed Aonghusa, S\u00edomha (PBP)", "O'Connell, Maeve (FG)": "O'Connell, Maeve (FG)", "Richmond, Neale (FG)": "Richmond, Neale (FG)", "Shatter, Alan (Non-P)": "Shatter, Alan (Non-P)", "Tracey, Shaun (SF)": "Tracey, Shaun (SF)", "Ahearne, Jina (TIP)": "Ahearne, Jina (TIP)", "Ardagh, Catherine (FF)": "Ardagh, Catherine (FF)", "Collins, Joan (RTC)": "Collins, Joan (RTC)", "Considine, Aisling (Ant)": "Considine, Aisling (Ant)", "Costello, Patrick (Grn)": "Costello, Patrick (Grn)", "Cummins, Jen (SD)": "Cummins, Jen (SD)", "De Nort\u00fain, Hazel (PBP)": "De Nort\u00fain, Hazel (PBP)", "Devine, M\u00e1ire (SF)": "Devine, M\u00e1ire (SF)", "Doolan, Daith\u00ed (SF)": "Doolan, Daith\u00ed (SF)", "Hendrick, Rebecca (Ind I )": "Hendrick, Rebecca (Ind I )", "Moriarty, Darragh (Lab)": "Moriarty, Darragh (Lab)", "Murphy, John Paul (RML)": "Murphy, John Paul (RML)", "Murray, Richard (Non-P)": "Murray, Richard (Non-P)", "\u00d3 Snodaigh, Aengus (SF)": "\u00d3 Snodaigh, Aengus (SF)", "Seery Kearney, Mary (FG)": "Seery Kearney, Mary (FG)", "Sutcliffe, Philip (Ind I )": "Sutcliffe, Philip (Ind I )", "Ward, Barry (IFP)": "Ward, Barry (IFP)", "Webster, Dolores (Non-P)": "Webster, Dolores (Non-P)", "Ahern, Ciaran (Lab)": "Ahern, Ciaran (Lab)", "Barnes, Sarah (FG)": "Barnes, Sarah (FG)", "Brophy, Colm (FG)": "Brophy, Colm (FG)", "Costello, Teresa (FF)": "Costello, Teresa (FF)", "Crowe, Se\u00e1n (SF)": "Crowe, Se\u00e1n (SF)", "Duffy, Francis Noel (Grn)": "Duffy, Francis Noel (Grn)", "Edge, Alan (Non-P)": "Edge, Alan (Non-P)", "Hade, Niall (Non-P)": "Hade, Niall (Non-P)", "Holohan, Patrick Pearse (Non-P)": "Holohan, Patrick Pearse (Non-P)", "Lahart, John (FF)": "Lahart, John (FF)", "Mac Oireachtaigh, Yan (TNP)": "Mac Oireachtaigh, Yan (TNP)", "Murphy, Paul (PBP)": "Murphy, Paul (PBP)", "Ni Ch\u00f3nar\u00e1in, Saoirse (Ant)": "Ni Ch\u00f3nar\u00e1in, Saoirse (Ant)", "O'Keeffe, Colm (Non-P)": "O'Keeffe, Colm (Non-P)", "O'Mullane, Ross (SD)": "O'Mullane, Ross (SD)", "Whelan, Niamh (SF)": "Whelan, Niamh (SF)", "Al-Qadri, Umar Mehr (Non-P)": "Al-Qadri, Umar Mehr (Non-P)", "Chambers, Jack (FF)": "Chambers, Jack (FF)", "Coppinger, Ruth (PBP)": "Coppinger, Ruth (PBP)", "Currie, Emer (FG)": "Currie, Emer (FG)", "Delaney, Susanne (Non-P)": "Delaney, Susanne (Non-P)", "Donnelly, Paul (SF)": "Donnelly, Paul (SF)", "Doyle, Tania (Non-P)": "Doyle, Tania (Non-P)", "Forde, John (Non-P)": "Forde, John (Non-P)", "Hanaphy, Breda (SF)": "Hanaphy, Breda (SF)", "Murphy, Ellen (SD)": "Murphy, Ellen (SD)", "Nolan, Lorna (FF)": "Nolan, Lorna (FF)", "O'Gorman, Roderic (Grn)": "O'Gorman, Roderic (Grn)", "Quinlan, Patrick (TNP)": "Quinlan, Patrick (TNP)", "Treacy, Natalie (Non-P)": "Treacy, Natalie (Non-P)", "Troy, Ellen (Ant)": "Troy, Ellen (Ant)", "Walsh, John (Lab)": "Walsh, John (Lab)", "Boyd Barrett, Richard (PBP)": "Boyd Barrett, Richard (PBP)", "Carroll MacNeill, Jennifer (FG)": "Carroll MacNeill, Jennifer (FG)", "Devlin, Cormac (FF)": "Devlin, Cormac (FF)", "Fanning, Martha (Lab)": "Fanning, Martha (Lab)", "Lynch, Cathy (TIP)": "Lynch, Cathy (TIP)", "Mills, Hugo (SD)": "Mills, Hugo (SD)", "O'Brien, Shane (SF)": "O'Brien, Shane (SF)", "O'Doherty, Michael (Non-P)": "O'Doherty, Michael (Non-P)", "Smyth, Ossian (Grn)": "Smyth, Ossian (Grn)", "T\u00f3ib\u00edn, Mair\u00e9ad (Ant)": "T\u00f3ib\u00edn, Mair\u00e9ad (Ant)", "Ward, Barry (FG)": "Ward, Barry (FG)", "Burke, Conor (PBP)": "Burke, Conor (PBP)", "Canney, Se\u00e1n (Non-P)": "Canney, Se\u00e1n (Non-P)", "Dolan, Albert (FF)": "Dolan, Albert (FF)", "Geraghty, Declan (Ind I )": "Geraghty, Declan (Ind I )", "Higgins, Clodagh (FG)": "Higgins, Clodagh (FG)", "Landy, Fergal (Non-P)": "Landy, Fergal (Non-P)", "Madden, Eoin (Grn)": "Madden, Eoin (Grn)", "Madden, Niamh (FG)": "Madden, Niamh (FG)", "Madden, Paul (Non-P)": "Madden, Paul (Non-P)", "O'Hara, Louis (SF)": "O'Hara, Louis (SF)", "O'Reilly, David (TIP)": "O'Reilly, David (TIP)", "Rabbitte, Anne (FF)": "Rabbitte, Anne (FF)", "Roche, Peter (FG)": "Roche, Peter (FG)", "Silke, Luke (Ant)": "Silke, Luke (Ant)", "Cahill, AJ (TIP)": "Cahill, AJ (TIP)", "Connolly, Catherine (Non-P)": "Connolly, Catherine (Non-P)", "Connolly, John (FF)": "Connolly, John (FF)", "Cubbard, Mike (Non-P)": "Cubbard, Mike (Non-P)", "Farrell, Mair\u00e9ad (SF)": "Farrell, Mair\u00e9ad (SF)", "Feeney, Patrick (Non-P)": "Feeney, Patrick (Non-P)", "Grealish, Noel (Non-P)": "Grealish, Noel (Non-P)", "Kyne, Se\u00e1n (FG)": "Kyne, Se\u00e1n (FG)", "Lenihan, P\u00e1draig (Ant)": "Lenihan, P\u00e1draig (Ant)", "McMahon, Doran (IFP)": "McMahon, Doran (IFP)", "McMaster, Maisie (PBP)": "McMaster, Maisie (PBP)", "Naughton, Hildegarde (FG)": "Naughton, Hildegarde (FG)", "Ogbu, Helen (Lab)": "Ogbu, Helen (Lab)", "O'Reilly, Pauline (Grn)": "O'Reilly, Pauline (Grn)", "Seoige, Gr\u00e1inne (FF)": "Seoige, Gr\u00e1inne (FF)", "Seoighthe, Eibhl\u00edn (SD)": "Seoighthe, Eibhl\u00edn (SD)", "Thomas, Noel (Ind I )": "Thomas, Noel (Ind I )", "Begley, Brandon (IFP)": "Begley, Brandon (IFP)", "Cahill, Michael (FF)": "Cahill, Michael (FF)", "Daly, Pa (SF)": "Daly, Pa (SF)", "Fitzgibbon, Mary (Non-P)": "Fitzgibbon, Mary (Non-P)", "Foley, Norma (FF)": "Foley, Norma (FF)", "Gordon Kelleher, Linda (FF)": "Gordon Kelleher, Linda (FF)", "Healy-Rae, Danny (Non-P)": "Healy-Rae, Danny (Non-P)", "Healy-Rae, Michael (Non-P)": "Healy-Rae, Michael (Non-P)", "Keane, Michelle (Non-P)": "Keane, Michelle (Non-P)", "Kennedy, Mike (Lab)": "Kennedy, Mike (Lab)", "Mc Ellistrim, Thomas (Ind I )": "Mc Ellistrim, Thomas (Ind I )", "Murphy, Cleo (Grn)": "Murphy, Cleo (Grn)", "O Leary, John (Non-P)": "O Leary, John (Non-P)", "O Shea, Billy (FG)": "O Shea, Billy (FG)", "O Shea, Stephanie (SF)": "O Shea, Stephanie (SF)", "O Sullivan, Catherina (Ant)": "O Sullivan, Catherina (Ant)", "Prendiville, Cian (PBP)": "Prendiville, Cian (PBP)", "Cear\u00fail, Naoise \u00d3 (FF)": "Cear\u00fail, Naoise \u00d3 (FF)", "Clear, Bill (Non-P)": "Clear, Bill (Non-P)", "Corcoran, Avril (TIP)": "Corcoran, Avril (TIP)", "Cronin, R\u00e9ada (SF)": "Cronin, R\u00e9ada (SF)", "Durkan, Bernard (FG)": "Durkan, Bernard (FG)", "Farrelly, Aidan (SD)": "Farrelly, Aidan (SD)", "Feeney, Angela (Lab)": "Feeney, Angela (Lab)", "Gill, Se\u00e1n (CPOI)": "Gill, Se\u00e1n (CPOI)", "Hogan, Caroline (SF)": "Hogan, Caroline (SF)", "Lawless, James (FF)": "Lawless, James (FF)", "Martin, Vincent P (Grn)": "Martin, Vincent P (Grn)", "Neville, Joe (FG)": "Neville, Joe (FG)", "O'Connor, Una (Ant)": "O'Connor, Una (Ant)", "Sammon, Evie (FG)": "Sammon, Evie (FG)", "Waters, Gerry (IFP)": "Waters, Gerry (IFP)", "Whelan, Leah (PBP)": "Whelan, Leah (PBP)", "Berry, Cathal (Non-P)": "Berry, Cathal (Non-P)", "Byrne, Melissa (Ant)": "Byrne, Melissa (Ant)", "Carton, Willie (Ind I )": "Carton, Willie (Ind I )", "Casey, Anthony (IFP)": "Casey, Anthony (IFP)", "Cosgrave, Robert (PBP)": "Cosgrave, Robert (PBP)", "Doran, Edel (Ind I )": "Doran, Edel (Ind I )", "Heydon, Martin (FG)": "Heydon, Martin (FG)", "McDonnell, Tom (Non-P)": "McDonnell, Tom (Non-P)", "N\u00ed Raghallaigh, Sh\u00f3nagh (SF)": "N\u00ed Raghallaigh, Sh\u00f3nagh (SF)", "O'Loughlin, Fiona (FF)": "O'Loughlin, Fiona (FF)", "O'Neill, Leanne (Non-P)": "O'Neill, Leanne (Non-P)", "Pender, Chris (SD)": "Pender, Chris (SD)", "Ryan, Patricia (Non-P)": "Ryan, Patricia (Non-P)", "Sood, Monaa K (Grn)": "Sood, Monaa K (Grn)", "Wall, Mark (Lab)": "Wall, Mark (Lab)", "Aird, William (FG)": "Aird, William (FG)", "Flanagan, Pauline (Non-P)": "Flanagan, Pauline (Non-P)", "Fleming, Sean (FF)": "Fleming, Sean (FF)", "Hande, Mary (Ant)": "Hande, Mary (Ant)", "Lynch, Jason (Non-P)": "Lynch, Jason (Non-P)", "McCormack, Maria (SF)": "McCormack, Maria (SF)", "Mooney, Ken (PBP)": "Mooney, Ken (PBP)", "Moran, Aisling (Non-P)": "Moran, Aisling (Non-P)", "Mullally, Elaine (Non-P)": "Mullally, Elaine (Non-P)", "Palmer, Rosie (Grn)": "Palmer, Rosie (Grn)", "Stack, Austin (FF)": "Stack, Austin (FF)", "Stanley, Brian (Non-P)": "Stanley, Brian (Non-P)", "Aherne, Esther (Ind I )": "Aherne, Esther (Ind I )", "Beasley, Sarah (Ant)": "Beasley, Sarah (Ant)", "Byrne, Maria (FG)": "Byrne, Maria (FG)", "Cleary, Melanie (Non-P)": "Cleary, Melanie (Non-P)", "Daly, Frankie (Non-P)": "Daly, Frankie (Non-P)", "Fahy, Ruair\u00ed (PBP)": "Fahy, Ruair\u00ed (PBP)", "Gavan, Paul (SF)": "Gavan, Paul (SF)", "Hayes, Michelle (Non-P)": "Hayes, Michelle (Non-P)", "Leddin, Brian (Grn)": "Leddin, Brian (Grn)", "Lillis, Dean (Non-P)": "Lillis, Dean (Non-P)", "O'Dea, Willie (FF)": "O'Dea, Willie (FF)", "O'Donnell, Kieran (FG)": "O'Donnell, Kieran (FG)", "O'Donovan, Elisa (SD)": "O'Donovan, Elisa (SD)", "Quinlivan, Maurice (SF)": "Quinlivan, Maurice (SF)", "Quinn, Dean (TIP)": "Quinn, Dean (TIP)", "Ryan, Dee (FF)": "Ryan, Dee (FF)", "Sheehan, Conor (Lab)": "Sheehan, Conor (Lab)", "Barrett, Jim (Non-P)": "Barrett, Jim (Non-P)", "Collins, Bridie (FF)": "Collins, Bridie (FF)", "Collins, Joanne (SF)": "Collins, Joanne (SF)", "Collins, Niall (FF)": "Collins, Niall (FF)", "Crehan, Richie (Non-P)": "Crehan, Richie (Non-P)", "Fahy, Laura (PBP)": "Fahy, Laura (PBP)", "O'Donnell, Rob (Grn)": "O'Donnell, Rob (Grn)", "O'Donoghue, Richard (Ind I )": "O'Donoghue, Richard (Ind I )", "O'Donovan, Patrick (FG)": "O'Donovan, Patrick (FG)", "O'Loughlin, Donna (IFP)": "O'Loughlin, Donna (IFP)", "O Sullivan, Lorraine (TIP)": "O Sullivan, Lorraine (TIP)", "Ryan, Michael (Ant)": "Ryan, Michael (Ant)", "Sheehan Corkery, April (Non-P)": "Sheehan Corkery, April (Non-P)", "Stokes, Noreen (FG)": "Stokes, Noreen (FG)", "Uunk, Gerben (PAW)": "Uunk, Gerben (PAW)", "Bennett, Fidelma (Lab)": "Bennett, Fidelma (Lab)", "Bradley, Paul (Non-P)": "Bradley, Paul (Non-P)", "Burke, Peter (FG)": "Burke, Peter (FG)", "Campion, Barry (SF)": "Campion, Barry (SF)", "Cannon, Tanya (FG)": "Cannon, Tanya (FG)", "Carrigy, Miche\u00e1l (FG)": "Carrigy, Miche\u00e1l (FG)", "Clarke, Sorca (SF)": "Clarke, Sorca (SF)", "Cunniffe, Dympna (FF)": "Cunniffe, Dympna (FF)", "Flaherty, Joe (FF)": "Flaherty, Joe (FF)", "Heavin, Louise (Non-P)": "Heavin, Louise (Non-P)", "Hogan, Paul (Ind I )": "Hogan, Paul (Ind I )", "Jackson, Donal (Non-P)": "Jackson, Donal (Non-P)", "Maguire, Margaret Alacoque (IF)": "Maguire, Margaret Alacoque (IF)", "Moran, Kevin \u2018Boxer\u2019 (Non-P)": "Moran, Kevin \u2018Boxer\u2019 (Non-P)", "Okeke, Carol (Grn)": "Okeke, Carol (Grn)", "O'Neill, Laura (Ant)": "O'Neill, Laura (Ant)", "Smyth, Dave (PBP)": "Smyth, Dave (PBP)", "Troy, Robert (FF)": "Troy, Robert (FF)", "Warnock, Gerry (Non-P)": "Warnock, Gerry (Non-P)", "Bradley, David (Non-P)": "Bradley, David (Non-P)", "Brennan, David (Non-P)": "Brennan, David (Non-P)", "Butler, Marianne (Grn)": "Butler, Marianne (Grn)", "Butterly, Paula (FG)": "Butterly, Paula (FG)", "Byrne, Albert David (Non-P)": "Byrne, Albert David (Non-P)", "Byrne, Joanna (SF)": "Byrne, Joanna (SF)", "Callan, Kevin (Non-P)": "Callan, Kevin (Non-P)", "Carroll, David (Non-P)": "Carroll, David (Non-P)", "Clare, Thomas (Non-P)": "Clare, Thomas (Non-P)", "Comyn, Alison (FF)": "Comyn, Alison (FF)", "Fagan, Alan (Non-P)": "Fagan, Alan (Non-P)", "Kelly, Hermann (IFP)": "Kelly, Hermann (IFP)", "McCreanor, Niall (SD)": "McCreanor, Niall (SD)", "McElearney, Derek (TIP)": "McElearney, Derek (TIP)", "McGahon, John (FG)": "McGahon, John (FG)", "McGreehan, Erin (FF)": "McGreehan, Erin (FF)", "McKeown, Ryan (Ind I )": "McKeown, Ryan (Ind I )", "Nash, Ged (Lab)": "Nash, Ged (Lab)", "Nugent, Peter-James (Non-P)": "Nugent, Peter-James (Non-P)", "O'Dowd, Michael (Ant)": "O'Dowd, Michael (Ant)", "O'Hanlon, Tracy Marie (Non-P)": "O'Hanlon, Tracy Marie (Non-P)", "\u00d3 Murch\u00fa, Ruair\u00ed (SF)": "\u00d3 Murch\u00fa, Ruair\u00ed (SF)", "Renaghan, James (PBP)": "Renaghan, James (PBP)", "Watters, Ant\u00f3in (SF)": "Watters, Ant\u00f3in (SF)", "Boxty \u00d3 Conaill, M\u00edche\u00e1l (Grn)": "Boxty \u00d3 Conaill, M\u00edche\u00e1l (Grn)", "Calleary, Dara (FF)": "Calleary, Dara (FF)", "Chambers, Lisa (FF)": "Chambers, Lisa (FF)", "Conway-Walsh, Rose (SF)": "Conway-Walsh, Rose (SF)", "Daly, Joe (PBP)": "Daly, Joe (PBP)", "Dillon, Alan (FG)": "Dillon, Alan (FG)", "Duffy, Mark (FG)": "Duffy, Mark (FG)", "Forkin, Sean (Non-P)": "Forkin, Sean (Non-P)", "Jennings, Martina (FG)": "Jennings, Martina (FG)", "Keogh, Keira (FG)": "Keogh, Keira (FG)", "Kerr, Stephen (Non-P)": "Kerr, Stephen (Non-P)", "Lawless, Paul (Ant)": "Lawless, Paul (Ant)", "Loftus, Gerry (Non-P)": "Loftus, Gerry (Non-P)", "Maxwell, Chris (Ind I )": "Maxwell, Chris (Ind I )", "Murray, Gerry (SF)": "Murray, Gerry (SF)", "O'Brien, Patsy (Non-P)": "O'Brien, Patsy (Non-P)", "Balfe, Eilish (Lab)": "Balfe, Eilish (Lab)", "Bobbett, Charles Patrick (Non-P)": "Bobbett, Charles Patrick (Non-P)", "Bonham, Ruadh\u00e1in (Grn)": "Bonham, Ruadh\u00e1in (Grn)", "Bonner, Joseph (Non-P)": "Bonner, Joseph (Non-P)", "Byrne, Thomas (FF)": "Byrne, Thomas (FF)", "Fahy, Carolyn (PAW)": "Fahy, Carolyn (PAW)", "McCormack, Clara (PBP)": "McCormack, Clara (PBP)", "McEntee, Helen (FG)": "McEntee, Helen (FG)", "Murray, Jean (TNP)": "Murray, Jean (TNP)", "Murugadoss, Sivakumar (Non-P)": "Murugadoss, Sivakumar (Non-P)", "O'Reilly, Caroline (FF)": "O'Reilly, Caroline (FF)", "O'Rourke, Darren (SF)": "O'Rourke, Darren (SF)", "Reid, Barbara (LR)": "Reid, Barbara (LR)", "T\u00f3ib\u00edn, Emer (Ant)": "T\u00f3ib\u00edn, Emer (Ant)", "Tolan, Sharon (FG)": "Tolan, Sharon (FG)", "Toole, Gillian (Non-P)": "Toole, Gillian (Non-P)", "Westlake, Raymond (Non-P)": "Westlake, Raymond (Non-P)", "White, Maria (SF)": "White, Maria (SF)", "Dempsey, Aisling (FF)": "Dempsey, Aisling (FF)", "French, Noel (Non-P)": "French, Noel (Non-P)", "Gallagher, Sandy (Lab)": "Gallagher, Sandy (Lab)", "Gilroy, Ben \"Bernard\" (LR)": "Gilroy, Ben \"Bernard\" (LR)", "Guirke, Johnny (SF)": "Guirke, Johnny (SF)", "Lynch, John \"Finbar\" (PBP)": "Lynch, John \"Finbar\" (PBP)", "McGauley, Ian (TIP)": "McGauley, Ian (TIP)", "McMenamin, Seamus (Grn)": "McMenamin, Seamus (Grn)", "Moore, Ronan (SD)": "Moore, Ronan (SD)", "Nelson Murray, Linda (FG)": "Nelson Murray, Linda (FG)", "Reilly, Damien (Non-P)": "Reilly, Damien (Non-P)", "T\u00f3ib\u00edn, Peadar (Ant)": "T\u00f3ib\u00edn, Peadar (Ant)", "Boylan, Mike (Non-P)": "Boylan, Mike (Non-P)", "Clendennen, John (FG)": "Clendennen, John (FG)", "Fitzpatrick, Eddie (Non-P)": "Fitzpatrick, Eddie (Non-P)", "Hackett, Pippa (Grn)": "Hackett, Pippa (Grn)", "Masterson, Aoife (SF)": "Masterson, Aoife (SF)", "McCormack, Tony (FF)": "McCormack, Tony (FF)", "McDonnell, Fergus (Ind I )": "McDonnell, Fergus (Ind I )", "Murray, Claire (FF)": "Murray, Claire (FF)", "Nolan, Carol (Non-P)": "Nolan, Carol (Non-P)", "Taylor, Keisha (PBP)": "Taylor, Keisha (PBP)", "Ward, Maureen (Ant)": "Ward, Maureen (Ant)", "Beirne, Vincent (Non-P)": "Beirne, Vincent (Non-P)", "\u00d3 Corcor\u00e1in, Cormac (Ant)": "\u00d3 Corcor\u00e1in, Cormac (Ant)", "Daly, Martin (FF)": "Daly, Martin (FF)", "Daly-Finn, Dympna (FG)": "Daly-Finn, Dympna (FG)", "Dolan, Aisling (FG)": "Dolan, Aisling (FG)", "Fitzmaurice, Michael (Ind I )": "Fitzmaurice, Michael (Ind I )", "Kerrane, Claire (SF)": "Kerrane, Claire (SF)", "Mannion, Andrew (PBP)": "Mannion, Andrew (PBP)", "Murphy, Eugene (Non-P)": "Murphy, Eugene (Non-P)", "O'Connor, Martina (Grn)": "O'Connor, Martina (Grn)", "Sweeney, Alan (TIP)": "Sweeney, Alan (TIP)", "Candon, Molly (PAW)": "Candon, Molly (PAW)", "Casserly, Marie (Non-P)": "Casserly, Marie (Non-P)", "Clarke, Michael (Ind I )": "Clarke, Michael (Ind I )", "Corcoran, Caroline (Ind I )": "Corcoran, Caroline (Ind I )", "Cosgrove, Nessa (Lab)": "Cosgrove, Nessa (Lab)", "Feighan, Frank (FG)": "Feighan, Frank (FG)", "Gallagher, Bl\u00e1ith\u00edn (Grn)": "Gallagher, Bl\u00e1ith\u00edn (Grn)", "Guckian, Des (Non-P)": "Guckian, Des (Non-P)", "Harkin, Marian (Non-P)": "Harkin, Marian (Non-P)", "Kelly, Michael (IFP)": "Kelly, Michael (IFP)", "Kenny, Martin (SF)": "Kenny, Martin (SF)", "MacManus, Chris (SF)": "MacManus, Chris (SF)", "McSharry, Edel (FF)": "McSharry, Edel (FF)", "Monaghan, Graham (Ant)": "Monaghan, Graham (Ant)", "O'Boyle, Gino (PBP)": "O'Boyle, Gino (PBP)", "O'Rourke, Paddy (FF)": "O'Rourke, Paddy (FF)", "Scanlon, Eamon (FF)": "Scanlon, Eamon (FF)", "Barry, Evan (SF)": "Barry, Evan (SF)", "Bugler, Phyll (FG)": "Bugler, Phyll (FG)", "Harty, Dan (SF)": "Harty, Dan (SF)", "Kelly, Alan (Lab)": "Kelly, Alan (Lab)", "Lowry, Michael (Non-P)": "Lowry, Michael (Non-P)", "Madden, Peter (TIP)": "Madden, Peter (TIP)", "Minehan, Liam (Non-P)": "Minehan, Liam (Non-P)", "O'Dwyer, Diana (PBP)": "O'Dwyer, Diana (PBP)", "O'Meara, Ryan (FF)": "O'Meara, Ryan (FF)", "O'Toole, Francis (Ant)": "O'Toole, Francis (Ant)", "Phelan, Justin Roundy (Non-P)": "Phelan, Justin Roundy (Non-P)", "Pocock, Iva (Grn)": "Pocock, Iva (Grn)", "Ryan, Jim (Non-P)": "Ryan, Jim (Non-P)", "Smith, Michael (FF)": "Smith, Michael (FF)", "Brennan, Michael Chicken (Lab)": "Brennan, Michael Chicken (Lab)", "Browne, Martin (SF)": "Browne, Martin (SF)", "Fitzgerald, Bill (Non-P)": "Fitzgerald, Bill (Non-P)", "Golsboro, Imelda (FF)": "Golsboro, Imelda (FF)", "Healy, Seamus (Non-P)": "Healy, Seamus (Non-P)", "Madigan, Myriam (Grn)": "Madigan, Myriam (Grn)", "McGlone, Rosemary (Ant)": "McGlone, Rosemary (Ant)", "McGrath, John (TNP)": "McGrath, John (TNP)", "McGrath, Mattie (Non-P)": "McGrath, Mattie (Non-P)", "Murphy, Michael (FG)": "Murphy, Michael (FG)", "O'Heney, John (Non-P)": "O'Heney, John (Non-P)", "Webster, Nadaline (Ind I )": "Webster, Nadaline (Ind I )", "Butler, Mary (FF)": "Butler, Mary (FF)", "Cleary, Dr Ronan (Ant)": "Cleary, Dr Ronan (Ant)", "Conway, Frank (Non-P)": "Conway, Frank (Non-P)", "Cullinane, David (SF)": "Cullinane, David (SF)", "Cummins, John (FG)": "Cummins, John (FG)", "Curtin, Patrick (PBP)": "Curtin, Patrick (PBP)", "D McGuinness, Conor (SF)": "D McGuinness, Conor (SF)", "Joyce, Aaron (Non-P)": "Joyce, Aaron (Non-P)", "Mangan, Killian (Non-P)": "Mangan, Killian (Non-P)", "\u00d3 Cathasaigh, Marc (Grn)": "\u00d3 Cathasaigh, Marc (Grn)", "O'Neill, Mark (Non-P)": "O'Neill, Mark (Non-P)", "O'Neill, Sadhbh (Lab)": "O'Neill, Sadhbh (Lab)", "Roche, Mary (SD)": "Roche, Mary (SD)", "Shanahan, Matt (Non-P)": "Shanahan, Matt (Non-P)", "Walsh, John D (TIP)": "Walsh, John D (TIP)", "Browne, James (FF)": "Browne, James (FF)", "Byrne, Cathal (FG)": "Byrne, Cathal (FG)", "Codd, Jim (Ant)": "Codd, Jim (Ant)", "Lawlor, George (Lab)": "Lawlor, George (Lab)", "McDonald, Peadar (Grn)": "McDonald, Peadar (Grn)", "Murphy, Bridin (FG)": "Murphy, Bridin (FG)", "Murphy, Jason (TNP)": "Murphy, Jason (TNP)", "Murphy, Verona (Non-P)": "Murphy, Verona (Non-P)", "Mythen, Johnny (SF)": "Mythen, Johnny (SF)", "O'Neill, Michelle (FF)": "O'Neill, Michelle (FF)", "Owens, Jackser (Non-P)": "Owens, Jackser (Non-P)", "Power, Stephen (TIP)": "Power, Stephen (TIP)", "Sheehan, Michael (Non-P)": "Sheehan, Michael (Non-P)", "Stafford, Martina (PBP)": "Stafford, Martina (PBP)", "Wallace, Mick (I4C)": "Wallace, Mick (I4C)", "Behan, Joe (Non-P)": "Behan, Joe (Non-P)", "Brady, John (SF)": "Brady, John (SF)", "Carry, Rob (Non-P)": "Carry, Rob (Non-P)", "Cullen, Shay (Non-P)": "Cullen, Shay (Non-P)", "Donnelly, Stephen (FF)": "Donnelly, Stephen (FF)", "Dwyer, Philip (Non-P)": "Dwyer, Philip (Non-P)", "Harris, Simon (FG)": "Harris, Simon (FG)", "Hogan, Ciaran (Ant)": "Hogan, Ciaran (Ant)", "Keddy, Charlie (Non-P)": "Keddy, Charlie (Non-P)", "Keddy, Michaela (TIP)": "Keddy, Michaela (TIP)", "Matthews, Steven (Grn)": "Matthews, Steven (Grn)", "McConnell, Kellie (PBP)": "McConnell, Kellie (PBP)", "O'Brien, Paul (Lab)": "O'Brien, Paul (Lab)", "O'Leary, Sean (Non-P)": "O'Leary, Sean (Non-P)", "O'Neill, Gerry (Non-P)": "O'Neill, Gerry (Non-P)", "Plant, Dominic (Non-P)": "Plant, Dominic (Non-P)", "Timmins, Edward (FG)": "Timmins, Edward (FG)", "Whitmore, Jennifer (SD)": "Whitmore, Jennifer (SD)", "Boland, Sin\u00e9ad (Ant)": "Boland, Sin\u00e9ad (Ant)", "Brennan, Brian (FG)": "Brennan, Brian (FG)", "Byrne, Malcolm (FF)": "Byrne, Malcolm (FF)", "Kennedy, Pat (FF)": "Kennedy, Pat (FF)", "Lawlor, Frances (Ind I )": "Lawlor, Frances (Ind I )", "Leonard, Peir (Non-P)": "Leonard, Peir (Non-P)", "Nolan, Ilse-Maria (Non-P)": "Nolan, Ilse-Maria (Non-P)", "O'Keeffe, Aislinn (PBP)": "O'Keeffe, Aislinn (PBP)", "O S\u00failleabh\u00e1in, FIonnt\u00e1n (SF)": "O S\u00failleabh\u00e1in, FIonnt\u00e1n (SF)", "Walsh, Ann (Grn)": "Walsh, Ann (Grn)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 43, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:22:49.858810", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.831, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.895, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.83, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.766, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.269, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.067, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.032, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.032, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 43}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3969851c1ebe4bfdb4e1c75a84ae2bf2", "name": "Trinidad and Tobago 2020 parliamentary (general) (overnight trinidad_and_tobago_2020_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Trinidad and Tobago", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://ebctt.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Preliminary-Results-for-the-2020-Parliamentary-Elections.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"COP": "COP", "DPT": "DPT", "ILP": "ILP", "IN1": "IN1", "IN2": "IN2", "IN3": "IN3", "IN4": "IN4", "MND": "MND", "MSJ": "MSJ", "NCT": "NCT", "NNV": "NNV", "NOW": "NOW", "OTV": "OTV", "PDP": "PDP", "PEP": "PEP", "PNM": "PNM", "PP": "PP", "TDF": "TDF", "THC": "THC", "TNP": "TNP", "UNC": "UNC", "UPP": "UPP", "UTP": "UTP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 41, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:22:46.827290", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.587, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.552, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.788, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.672, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.587, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.707, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.467, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.314, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.224, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.556, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.788, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.672, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.657, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.657, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.102, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.102, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 41}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9859c8e0cf94480e8ab4999b3ffc0699", "name": "Belize 2020 parliamentary (overnight belize_2020_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Belize", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://elections.gov.bz/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Official-Results-Final.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"BJM": "BJM", "GODP": "GODP", "IND": "IND", "PDM": "PDM", "PNP": "PNP", "PUP": "PUP", "UDP_None": "UDP_None", "UDP_S": "UDP_S", "UDP_T": "UDP_T"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 29, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:22:25.160201", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 29}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "61437360dff143529737c2d86dc73fe4", "name": "Gibraltar 2023 parliamentary (overnight gibraltar_2023_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Gibraltar", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.parliament.gi/uploads/docs/elections/2023/information/general_election_2023_results.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cand_ARIAS_VASQUEZ_G": "cand_ARIAS_VASQUEZ_G", "cand_AZOPARDI_K": "cand_AZOPARDI_K", "cand_BOSSANO_J": "cand_BOSSANO_J", "cand_BOSSINO_D": "cand_BOSSINO_D", "cand_BRUZON_L": "cand_BRUZON_L", "cand_CLINTON_R": "cand_CLINTON_R", "cand_CORTES_J": "cand_CORTES_J", "cand_DARYANANI_V": "cand_DARYANANI_V", "cand_EL_HANA_Y": "cand_EL_HANA_Y", "cand_FEETHAM_N": "cand_FEETHAM_N", "cand_GARCIA_J": "cand_GARCIA_J", "cand_LADISLAUS_J": "cand_LADISLAUS_J", "cand_ORFILA_P": "cand_ORFILA_P", "cand_ORIGO_G": "cand_ORIGO_G", "cand_PICARDO_F": "cand_PICARDO_F", "cand_REYES_E": "cand_REYES_E", "cand_SACARELLO_C": "cand_SACARELLO_C", "cand_SANCHEZ_A": "cand_SANCHEZ_A", "cand_SANTOS_C": "cand_SANTOS_C", "cand_TILBURY_D": "cand_TILBURY_D", "cand_VASQUEZ_R": "cand_VASQUEZ_R"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 30, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 30, "cast_gt_registered": 30}, "n_stations_flagged": 30, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:22:24.635930", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 30}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f8ca0b62960e4c46b81c2ec7669b2481", "name": "Guinea-Bissau 2023 parliamentary (overnight guinea-bissau_2023_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Guinea-Bissau", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "http://www.cne.gw/resultado-geral-legislativas-2023 (file: http://www.cne.gw/images/docs/DISTRIBUIO_DE_VOTOS_POR_PARTIDO_2023.pdf)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"APU_PDGB": "APU_PDGB", "PDD_MP": "PDD_MP", "APR": "APR", "PUSD": "PUSD", "RGB": "RGB", "PAI_TERRA_RANKA": "PAI_TERRA_RANKA", "MADEM_G_15": "MADEM_G_15", "PUN": "PUN", "PTG": "PTG", "PRID": "PRID", "PND": "PND", "FREPASNA": "FREPASNA", "PALDG": "PALDG", "COLIDE_GB": "COLIDE_GB", "PMP": "PMP", "CD": "CD", "PNP": "PNP", "PAPES": "PAPES", "MSD": "MSD", "PRS": "PRS", "CNA": "CNA", "PLGB": "PLGB"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 29, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:22:23.910510", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.591, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.444, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.428, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.231, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.591, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.444, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.494, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.359, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.451, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.789, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.697, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.189, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.047, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.428, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.428, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.231, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.231, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.247, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.247, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.425, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.425, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.638, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 29}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "415c3a568efb412e9bb319bcb0075f29", "name": "Cambodia 2023 parliamentary (overnight cambodia_2023_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cambodia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://data.opendevelopmentcambodia.net/dataset/results-on-the-national-assembly-s-election-2023 (Open Development Cambodia, derived from NEC official results; NEC source https://www.nec.gov.kh/khmer/content/7257)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"province_code": "province_code", "party_BSDP": "party_BSDP", "party_KUP": "party_KUP", "party_CNP": "party_CNP", "Khmer National United Party (KNUP)": "Khmer National United Party (KNUP)", "party_DPP": "party_DPP", "Farmer Party (FP)": "Farmer Party (FP)", "Women Party (WPFW)": "Women Party (WPFW)", "Khmer Anti-Poverty Party (KAPP)": "Khmer Anti-Poverty Party (KAPP)", "FUNCINPEC": "FUNCINPEC", "Dharmacracy/Democracy Party (DP)": "Dharmacracy/Democracy Party (DP)", "Grassroots Democratic Party (GDP)": "Grassroots Democratic Party (GDP)", "party_PPP": "party_PPP", "party_KEDP": "party_KEDP", "Ekpheap Cheat Khmer Party (ECP)": "Ekpheap Cheat Khmer Party (ECP)", "party_KCP": "party_KCP", "Cambodian Youth Party (CYP)": "Cambodian Youth Party (CYP)", "Cambodia Indigenous Peoples Democracy Party (CIPDP)": "Cambodia Indigenous Peoples Democracy Party (CIPDP)", "Cambodian People's Party (CPP)": "Cambodian People's Party (CPP)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 25, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 25, "cast_gt_registered": 25, "votes_gt_valid": 25}, "n_stations_flagged": 25, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:21:58.925099", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.551, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.111, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.189, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.052, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.138, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.111, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.528, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.084, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.271, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.554, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.139, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.16, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.04, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.662, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.702, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.175, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.189, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.189, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.052, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.052, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.084, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.084, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.09, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.09, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.166, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.166, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 25}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3f41dd5dc92b42838c09af9a96a41d96", "name": "Benin 2023 parliamentary (overnight benin_2023_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Benin", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.cena.bj/  (CENA portal -> elections API admin.cena.bj/api/cena/v1/elections, links Cour constitutionnelle proclamation PDF on Google Drive id 1p3-1bRdyF46qZsUvWVRGMCC5NR5VyRbj)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"circonscription": "circonscription", "MOELE_BENIN": "MOELE_BENIN", "FCBE": "FCBE", "Les_Democrates": "Les_Democrates", "UP_Le_Renouveau": "UP_Le_Renouveau", "UDBN": "UDBN", "MPL": "MPL", "Bloc_republicain": "Bloc_republicain"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 24, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 24, "registered_not_positive": 24, "cast_gt_registered": 24}, "n_stations_flagged": 24, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:21:58.264115", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.733, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.487, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.313, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.733, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.301, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.898, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.725, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.746, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.395, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.911, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.478, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.487, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.487, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.313, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.313, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.382, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.382, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.513, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.513, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.183, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.183, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.697, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.697, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 24}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cc4e5119f8be4517a83d611e9f25bb7a", "name": "Mauritius 2024 parliamentary (overnight mauritius_2024_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mauritius", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electoral.govmu.org/oec/?page_id=1641 (OEC Detailed Results by Constituency, WPFD category 232; 21 per-constituency PDFs via admin-ajax.php?action=wpfd&task=files.getFiles&id=232 then task=file.download)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cnum": "cnum", "Alliance_Du_Changement": "Alliance_Du_Changement", "Alliance_Liberation": "Alliance_Liberation", "Citizens_Power": "Citizens_Power", "Ene_Nouvo_Espwar_ENE": "Ene_Nouvo_Espwar_ENE", "Front_Solidarite_Mauricien": "Front_Solidarite_Mauricien", "Front_Solidarite_Mauricien_FSM": "Front_Solidarite_Mauricien_FSM", "Ideal_Democrate": "Ideal_Democrate", "LAlliance_Lepep": "LAlliance_Lepep", "LALIT": "LALIT", "Les_Incorruptibles": "Les_Incorruptibles", "Linion_Reform": "Linion_Reform", "Mouvement_Authentique_Mauricien_MAM": "Mouvement_Authentique_Mauricien_MAM", "Mouvement_M_ritocrate": "Mouvement_M_ritocrate", "Mouvement_Rodriguais_MR": "Mouvement_Rodriguais_MR", "Mouvement_Zeness_Vacoas_Phoenix": "Mouvement_Zeness_Vacoas_Phoenix", "Mouvman_Bruneau_Laurette": "Mouvman_Bruneau_Laurette", "Mouvman_Enn_Sel_Direction": "Mouvman_Enn_Sel_Direction", "Mouvman_Verite_Zistis": "Mouvman_Verite_Zistis", "Movement_Democratic_Mauricien": "Movement_Democratic_Mauricien", "Muvman_Independantis_Rodriguais": "Muvman_Independantis_Rodriguais", "NEXTGen": "NEXTGen", "NIL": "NIL", "Nouveau_Front_Politik_NFP": "Nouveau_Front_Politik_NFP", "Organisation_du_Peuple_de_Rodrigues_OPR": "Organisation_du_Peuple_de_Rodrigues_OPR", "Parti_Liberale_Unioniste_Rodriguais": "Parti_Liberale_Unioniste_Rodriguais", "Parti_Pli_Rus": "Parti_Pli_Rus", "Parti_Rodriguais_Travailleur_Democrate": "Parti_Rodriguais_Travailleur_Democrate", "Parti_R_publique": "Parti_R_publique", "Party_Malin": "Party_Malin", "Rasanbleman_Pou_Lavansman_Moris_RPLM": "Rasanbleman_Pou_Lavansman_Moris_RPLM", "Rassemblement_Socialiste_Mauricien": "Rassemblement_Socialiste_Mauricien"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 21, "cast_gt_registered": 21, "votes_gt_valid": 21}, "n_stations_flagged": 21, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:21:57.629915", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.894, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.534, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.495, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.449, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.17, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.537, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.226, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.495, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.495, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.382, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.382, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.706, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.707, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.707, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.455, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.621, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8b0a01ced2404422901ee1bee7bed3d0", "name": "Kazakhstan 2023 parliamentary (overnight kazakhstan_2023_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Kazakhstan", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.election.gov.kz/rus/news/releases/index.php?ID=8921", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AMANAT": "AMANAT", "Auyl": "Auyl", "Respublika": "Respublika", "NarodnayaPartiya": "NarodnayaPartiya", "Baytaq": "Baytaq", "AkZhol": "AkZhol", "OSDP": "OSDP", "ProtivVsekh": "ProtivVsekh"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20, "granularity": "region", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 20, "cast_gt_registered": 20}, "n_stations_flagged": 20, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:21:56.970798", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.876, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.076, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.269, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.139, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.876, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.076, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.519, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.109, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.206, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.692, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.173, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.591, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.62, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.155, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.269, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.269, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.139, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.139, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.204, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.531, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.531, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.153, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.153, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.362, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.362, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 20}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ef6a1accdc4c4e8bb0b3dac960140010", "name": "Timor-Leste 2023 parliamentary (overnight timor-leste_2023_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Timor-Leste", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.cne.tl/ap2023/  (CNE digital tabulation platform; per-municipality votos.*.json and status.*.json bundled in /ap2023/static/js/main.6348dc53.js, recovered via Wayback)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"n_stations": "n_stations", "PDN": "PDN", "PLPA": "PLPA", "PLP": "PLP", "PD": "PD", "KHUNTO": "KHUNTO", "PVT": "PVT", "UDT": "UDT", "PUDD": "PUDD", "PR": "PR", "UNDERTIM": "UNDERTIM", "FRETILIN": "FRETILIN", "CNRT": "CNRT", "CASDT": "CASDT", "MLPM": "MLPM", "PST": "PST", "PDC": "PDC", "APMT": "APMT"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 19, "cast_valid_mismatch": 16}, "n_stations_flagged": 19, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:21:56.523639", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.758, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.875, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.714, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.526, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.758, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.458, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.802, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.651, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.663, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.483, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.526, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.526, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.457, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.673, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.673, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.221, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.221, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 19}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8eb7968404a84e9e9f5ad05e69a78b1c", "name": "Angola 2022 parliamentary (national assembly / assembleia nacional) (overnight angola_2022_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Angola", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://resultados2022eleicoesgerais.cne.ao/ (official CNE results portal; Next.js static export, data at /_next/data/JvjL5QHTnAqt-sJjM0q8o/resultados/{0..19}.json?scope={N}; scope 0=national, 1-19=the 19 provincial constituencies). Also mirrored on the Wayback Machine.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"MPLA": "MPLA", "UNITA": "UNITA", "PRS": "PRS", "FNLA": "FNLA", "PHA": "PHA", "CASA-CE": "CASA-CE", "APN": "APN", "P-NJANGO": "P-NJANGO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:21:55.988133", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.164, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.38, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.326, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.153, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.164, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.541, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.38, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.595, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.335, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.019, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.255, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.203, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.3, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.325, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.649, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.162, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.326, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.326, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.153, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.153, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.125, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.125, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.221, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.221, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.562, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.484, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.484, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 19}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6911fb41f4194fd8b692a201e32fd437", "name": "Vanuatu 2022 parliamentary (overnight vanuatu_2022_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Vanuatu", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electoral.gov.vu/media/attachments/2022/10/23/results.pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Community Movement To Righteousness Peace No Justice": "Community Movement To Righteousness Peace No Justice", "Divine Freedom Alliance Party": "Divine Freedom Alliance Party", "Fren Melanesian Party": "Fren Melanesian Party", "Graon Mo Jastis Pati": "Graon Mo Jastis Pati", "Green Confederation": "Green Confederation", "Household Prosperity Party": "Household Prosperity Party", "Iauko Group": "Iauko Group", "Imaim": "Imaim", "Independent": "Independent", "Laverwo Movement": "Laverwo Movement", "Leaders Party Vanuatu": "Leaders Party Vanuatu", "Liberal Democratic Party": "Liberal Democratic Party", "Liswin": "Liswin", "Nagriamel Movement": "Nagriamel Movement", "Namarakieana Movement": "Namarakieana Movement", "National United Party": "National United Party", "Ngwasoanda Custom Movement": "Ngwasoanda Custom Movement", "North to South United Party": "North to South United Party", "Oceania Transformation Movement": "Oceania Transformation Movement", "Pentecost Aelon Kastom Movement": "Pentecost Aelon Kastom Movement", "People Unity Development Party": "People Unity Development Party", "People's Progressive Party": "People's Progressive Party", "People's Unity Development Party": "People's Unity Development Party", "Peoples Unity Development Party": "Peoples Unity Development Party", "Pikinini Blong Kraon Movement": "Pikinini Blong Kraon Movement", "Pipols Sevisis Pati": "Pipols Sevisis Pati", "Presidential Party": "Presidential Party", "Reunification Movement for Change": "Reunification Movement for Change", "Rural Development Party": "Rural Development Party", "Shepherd Alliance Party": "Shepherd Alliance Party", "Shepherd Sea Eagles Alliance": "Shepherd Sea Eagles Alliance", "The Peoples Party": "The Peoples Party", "Union of Moderate Parties": "Union of Moderate Parties", "United Movements for Vanuatu People": "United Movements for Vanuatu People", "Unity for Change Movement": "Unity for Change Movement", "Upi Naftan Iskei": "Upi Naftan Iskei", "Vanua'aku Pati": "Vanua'aku Pati", "Vanuatu Community Movement": "Vanuatu Community Movement", "Vanuatu Cultural Self Reliant Movement": "Vanuatu Cultural Self Reliant Movement", "Vanuatu Liberal Movement": "Vanuatu Liberal Movement", "Vanuatu National Development Party": "Vanuatu National Development Party", "Vanuatu New Nation Party": "Vanuatu New Nation Party", "Vanuatu Progress Republican Fama": "Vanuatu Progress Republican Fama", "Vanuatu Progressive Development Party": "Vanuatu Progressive Development Party", "Vanuatu Republican Party": "Vanuatu Republican Party", "Vemarana Federation Custom Movement": "Vemarana Federation Custom Movement", "Vemarana Movement": "Vemarana Movement", "Wan Nakamal": "Wan Nakamal"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:21:55.401644", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.882, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.933, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.804, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.681, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.882, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.876, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.508, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.21, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.971, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.493, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.911, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9f85d7ab9de44ac08d391e59df25f727", "name": "Saint Lucia 2021 parliamentary (general/house of assembly) (overnight saint_lucia_2021_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Lucia", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.sluelectoral.com/2021-election-results/", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"turnout_pct": "turnout_pct", "SLP": "SLP", "UWP": "UWP", "NGP": "NGP", "IND": "IND"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1, "votes_gt_valid": 17}, "n_stations_flagged": 17, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:21:54.620555", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "21349ef8eed74974b4ed4960e0b768f7", "name": "Lebanon 2022 parliamentary (overnight lebanon_2022_parliamentary_full.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Lebanon", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/260626/EU-EOM%20Lebanon-2022-Final-report-EN.pdf (ANNEX 4 - ELECTION RESULTS, pp.71-75)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votefor_official": "votefor_official", "fpm_allies": "fpm_allies", "hezbollah_amal_allies": "hezbollah_amal_allies", "independent": "independent", "kadireen": "kadireen", "kataeb": "kataeb", "lebanese_forces_allies": "lebanese_forces_allies", "marada_allies": "marada_allies", "newly_emerging_forces": "newly_emerging_forces", "psp_allies": "psp_allies"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 15, "cast_valid_mismatch": 15}, "n_stations_flagged": 15, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:21:54.058353", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.796, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.831, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.405, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.25, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.796, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.232, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.223, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.398, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.349, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.404, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.405, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.405, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.25, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.25, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.253, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.253, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.648, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.502, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.502, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 15}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dc66e9cd2e50448596d5f40c2b7764f4", "name": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 2020 general (overnight saint_vincent_and_the_grenadines_2020_general.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Vincent and the Grenadines", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electoral.gov.vc/electoral/index.php/news/46-final-count-from-2020-general-election-results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ULP": "ULP", "NDP": "NDP", "GP": "GP", "INP": "INP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:21:53.513601", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 15}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "37007c719b21451abce6be611707d6c3", "name": "El Salvador 2024 presidential (overnight el_salvador_2024_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "El Salvador", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://divulgacion.tse.gob.sv/resultados/dashboard-departamento-{1..14,16}-1.html (via Wayback id_ raw, snapshots 2024-03-17)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"departamento_id": "departamento_id", "NUEVAS_IDEAS": "NUEVAS_IDEAS", "ARENA": "ARENA", "FMLN": "FMLN", "NUESTRO_TIEMPO": "NUESTRO_TIEMPO", "FPS": "FPS", "FUERZA_SOLIDARIA": "FUERZA_SOLIDARIA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 14, "votes_gt_valid": 15}, "n_stations_flagged": 15, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:21:52.949021", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.383, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.121, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.335, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.09, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.383, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.596, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.121, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.352, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.574, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.143, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.686, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.346, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.337, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.335, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.09, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.09, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.132, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.132, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.484, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.484, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.684, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.684, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.392, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 15}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "177b029f84a546aeb7ec24cc0430d3fb", "name": "Cape Verde 2021 parliamentary (overnight cape_verde_2021_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Cape Verde", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://eleicoes.cv/history/official-results-2021.json (CNE official results portal eleicoes.cv; regions map https://eleicoes.cv/data/regions.json)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"MPD": "MPD", "PAICV": "PAICV", "PP": "PP", "PSD": "PSD", "PTS": "PTS", "UCID": "UCID"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:21:52.258479", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.775, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.936, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.775, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.676, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.775, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.635, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.271, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.678, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.482, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.676, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.601, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.601, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.259, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.259, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 13}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c6109dc6849f4aa4be93fc46a4b42fe6", "name": "Malta 2022 parliamentary (overnight malta_2022_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Malta", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://electoral.gov.mt/ElectionResults/General?year=248 (Electoral Commission of Malta; per-district page year=248&v=<zoneId 877-889>)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"zone_id": "zone_id", "quota": "quota", "ABBA": "ABBA", "A_PD": "A_PD", "IND": "IND", "PL": "PL", "PN": "PN", "PP": "PP", "VM": "VM"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 13}, "n_stations_flagged": 13, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:21:51.801006", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.668, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.914, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.78, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.617, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.668, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.869, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.052, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.632, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.745, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.436, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.78, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.617, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.617, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.785, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.186, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 13}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8cd241d8f0dc4545a6a7c84f9be2f86d", "name": "Mozambique 2024 presidential (overnight mozambique_2024_presidential.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Mozambique", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://web.archive.org/web/20250609115510id_/https://university.open.ac.uk/technology/mozambique/sites/www.open.ac.uk.technology.mozambique/files/files/Resultados%20Eleitorais%202024(1).pdf", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Daniel_Chapo": "Daniel_Chapo", "Venancio_Mondlane": "Venancio_Mondlane", "Ossufo_Momade": "Ossufo_Momade", "Lutero_Simango": "Lutero_Simango", "branco": "branco"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3, "votes_gt_valid": 13}, "n_stations_flagged": 13, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:21:51.297332", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.054, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.31, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.189, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.054, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.264, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.574, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.221, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.364, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.091, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.087, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.272, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.31, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.31, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.189, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.189, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.2, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.2, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.488, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.567, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.567, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.698, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.698, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.52, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.52, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 13}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6bea7f0844404eba81581e746500b8ec", "name": "San Marino 2024 parliamentary (overnight san_marino_2024_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "San Marino", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.elezionipolitiche.sm/elezioni/tabelle/tab_voti.jsp?cast=N (official EMB results app, captured via Wayback Machine id_ raw mode, June-July 2024 snapshots)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"cast_code": "cast_code", "PSD": "PSD", "LIBERA_PS": "LIBERA_PS", "PDCS": "PDCS", "AR": "AR", "DEMOS": "DEMOS", "RF": "RF", "MOTUS": "MOTUS", "RETE": "RETE", "COAL_LIBPS_PSD": "COAL_LIBPS_PSD", "COAL_PDCS_AR": "COAL_PDCS_AR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 12}, "n_stations_flagged": 12, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:21:50.019174", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 12}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7448391b1b814950b3e41dc53b24a4cb", "name": "Liechtenstein 2025 parliamentary (overnight liechtenstein_2025_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Liechtenstein", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.landtagswahlen.li/resultat/16", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"FBP": "FBP", "VU": "VU", "DPL": "DPL", "FL": "FL"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 11}, "n_stations_flagged": 11, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:21:49.494820", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 11}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0e0b715f19244117809540a2390e4968", "name": "Sao Tome and Principe 2022 parliamentary (overnight sao_tome_2022_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Sao Tome and Principe", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://www.cen.st/images/casa/Eleicoes/Legislativas/2022/Resultados/RP%20Legislativas%201.jpg (+ RP%20Legislativas%202.jpg) via Wayback id_ raw 20221014212730/20221009153234", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ADI": "ADI", "BASTA": "BASTA", "UDD": "UDD", "MCI_PS_PUN": "MCI_PS_PUN", "MSD_PVSTP": "MSD_PVSTP", "PTOS": "PTOS", "CID_STP": "CID_STP", "MLSTP_PSD": "MLSTP_PSD", "MUDA_STP": "MUDA_STP", "PARTIDO_NOVO": "PARTIDO_NOVO", "MDFM_UL": "MDFM_UL"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 9, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:21:49.007882", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.646, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.866, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.65, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.542, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.882, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.989, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.747, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.767, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.417, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.22, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.65, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.542, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.542, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.455, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.731, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.731, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.289, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.813, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.813, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 9}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "87a1caa0b0a74d71b651bfdaaf7a0519", "name": "Andorra 2023 parliamentary (overnight andorra_2023_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Andorra", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://eg2023.ari.ad/json/results.json (Andorra Recerca + Innovacio official real-time scrutiny SPA, cracked from /assets/index-88e1b44f.js); cross-ref official https://www.eleccions.ad / govern.ad", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"null": "null", "accio": "accio", "andorra_endavant": "andorra_endavant", "concordia": "concordia", "democrates": "democrates", "liberals": "liberals", "ps_progressistes": "ps_progressistes"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:21:48.561240", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fc690ea1a5ea4e629bab80e363140c12", "name": "Iceland 2024 parliamentary (overnight iceland_2024_parliamentary.parquet)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "https://px.hagstofa.is/pxen/api/v1/en/Ibuar/kosningar/althingi/althurslit/KOS02018.px (valid votes by party); KOS02123.px (cast/valid/blank/void); registered voters from RUV muninn API https://muninn.kosningar.ruv.is/kosningar/api/348", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"void": "void", "Progressive_B": "Progressive_B", "Reform_Vidreisn_C": "Reform_Vidreisn_C", "Independence_D": "Independence_D", "Peoples_Party_F": "Peoples_Party_F", "Socialist_J": "Socialist_J", "Democratic_L": "Democratic_L", "Centre_M": "Centre_M", "Pirate_P": "Pirate_P", "Social_Democratic_S": "Social_Democratic_S", "Left_Green_V": "Left_Green_V", "Responsible_Future_Y": "Responsible_Future_Y"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-06-25T08:21:48.022096", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.8, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.585, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.842, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.757, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.8, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.585, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.132, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.434, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.764, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "67e52c3343e14962bb1ad424f8134225", "name": "London 2024 \u2014 Assembly London-wide (list) per constituency", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "GLA 2024 London Assembly London-wide (PR list) by Assembly constituency.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Animal Welfare Party - People, Animals, Environment": "Animal Welfare Party - People, Animals, Environment", "Britain First": "Britain First", "Christian Peoples Alliance": "Christian Peoples Alliance", "Communist Party of Britain": "Communist Party of Britain", "Conservatives": "Conservatives", "Heritage Party": "Heritage Party", "Labour Party": "Labour Party", "Liberal Democrats": "Liberal Democrats", "ReformUK \u2013 London Deserves Better": "ReformUK \u2013 London Deserves Better", "Rejoin EU": "Rejoin EU", "Social Democratic Party": "Social Democratic Party", "The Green Party": "The Green Party", "FOX, Laurence": "FOX, Laurence", "LONDON, Farah Independent": "LONDON, Farah Independent", "ROMUALDO, Gabe Independent": "ROMUALDO, Gabe Independent"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-24T21:38:33.833246", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.864, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.951, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.832, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.75, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.5, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.144, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.286, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.124, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.043, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 14}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "af119ef4e3204b5bae3d1ab0f243847d", "name": "London 2024 \u2014 Mayor (FPTP) per constituency", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "GLA 2024 Mayoral election (first-past-the-post; SV abolished) by Assembly constituency \u2014 London Elects published no ward-level 2024 release.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AMIN, Femy Animal Welfare Party - People, Animals, Environment": "AMIN, Femy Animal Welfare Party - People, Animals, Environment", "BINFACE, Count Count Binface Party": "BINFACE, Count Count Binface Party", "BLACKIE, Rob Liberal Democrats": "BLACKIE, Rob Liberal Democrats", "CAMPBELL, Natalie Denise Independent": "CAMPBELL, Natalie Denise Independent", "COX, Howard ReformUK": "COX, Howard ReformUK", "GALLAGHER, Amy Social Democratic Party": "GALLAGHER, Amy Social Democratic Party", "GARBETT, Zo\u0207 Green Party": "GARBETT, Zo\u0207 Green Party", "GHULATI, Tarun Independent": "GHULATI, Tarun Independent", "HALL, Susan Mary Conservative and Unionist Party": "HALL, Susan Mary Conservative and Unionist Party", "KHAN, Sadiq Labour Party": "KHAN, Sadiq Labour Party", "MICHLI, Andreas Christoffi Independent": "MICHLI, Andreas Christoffi Independent", "ROSE, Brian Benedict London Real Party": "ROSE, Brian Benedict London Real Party", "SCANLON, Nick Britain First": "SCANLON, Nick Britain First"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-24T21:38:32.598019", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.864, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.951, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.832, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.75, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.5, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.144, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.286, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.124, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.043, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 14}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bb4bf9cc8954420ea99cd995f37df744", "name": "London 2021 \u2014 Assembly London-wide (list) per ward", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "GLA 2021 London Assembly London-wide (PR list) votes per ward.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Conservatives": "Conservatives", "Vote Women's Equality Party on orange": "Vote Women's Equality Party on orange", "National Liberal Party - Self determination for all!": "National Liberal Party - Self determination for all!", "Green Party": "Green Party", "Trade Union and Socialist Coalition": "Trade Union and Socialist Coalition", "Let London Live": "Let London Live", "ReformUK - London Deserves Better": "ReformUK - London Deserves Better", "Liberal Democrats": "Liberal Democrats", "Communist Party of Britain": "Communist Party of Britain", "Londependence": "Londependence", "Heritage Party - Free Speech and Liberty": "Heritage Party - Free Speech and Liberty", "London Real Party": "London Real Party", "UKIP": "UKIP", "Labour Party": "Labour Party", "Christian Peoples Alliance": "Christian Peoples Alliance", "Rejoin EU": "Rejoin EU", "Social Democratic Party": "Social Democratic Party", "Animal Welfare Party - People, Animals, Environment": "Animal Welfare Party - People, Animals, Environment"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 669, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-24T21:38:26.615804", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 33, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.919, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.958, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.857, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.781, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.507, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.369, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.569, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.706, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.053, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.053, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 669}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cfade959b0a04a2982495b554366fc00", "name": "London 2021 \u2014 Mayor (1st choice) per ward", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "GLA 2021 Mayoral election, 1st-preference votes per ward (London Elects ward-level release).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Valerie BROWN - The Burning Pink Party": "Valerie BROWN - The Burning Pink Party", "Nims OBUNGE - Independent": "Nims OBUNGE - Independent", "Peter John GAMMONS - UKIP": "Peter John GAMMONS - UKIP", "Mandu Kate REID - Vote Women's Equality Party on orange": "Mandu Kate REID - Vote Women's Equality Party on orange", "Piers CORBYN - Let London Live": "Piers CORBYN - Let London Live", "Max FOSH - Independent": "Max FOSH - Independent", "Luisa Manon PORRITT - Liberal Democrats": "Luisa Manon PORRITT - Liberal Democrats", "Niko OMILANA - Independent": "Niko OMILANA - Independent", "David KURTEN - Heritage Party": "David KURTEN - Heritage Party", "Sian BERRY - Green Party": "Sian BERRY - Green Party", "Shaun BAILEY - Conservative Party Candidate": "Shaun BAILEY - Conservative Party Candidate", "Richard John Howard HEWISON - Rejoin EU": "Richard John Howard HEWISON - Rejoin EU", "Kam BALAYEV - Renew": "Kam BALAYEV - Renew", "Farah LONDON - Independent": "Farah LONDON - Independent", "Count BINFACE - Count Binface for Mayor of London": "Count BINFACE - Count Binface for Mayor of London", "Brian Benedict ROSE - London Real Party": "Brian Benedict ROSE - London Real Party", "Steve KELLEHER - Social Democratic Party": "Steve KELLEHER - Social Democratic Party", "Laurence FOX - The Reclaim Party": "Laurence FOX - The Reclaim Party", "Sadiq Aman KHAN - Labour Party": "Sadiq Aman KHAN - Labour Party", "Vanessa Helen HUDSON - Animal Welfare Party-People, Animals, Environment": "Vanessa Helen HUDSON - Animal Welfare Party-People, Animals, Environment"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 669, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-24T21:38:23.177870", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 33, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.919, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.958, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.857, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.781, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.507, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.369, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.569, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.706, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.053, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.053, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 669}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "472e6d23592e4b08a8b3aa89e21ea7a9", "name": "London 2016 \u2014 Assembly London-wide (list) per ward", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2016, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "GLA 2016 London Assembly London-wide (PR list) votes per ward.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Animal Welfare Party": "Animal Welfare Party", "Britain First": "Britain First", "British National Party": "British National Party", "Caroline Pidgeon's London Liberal Democrats": "Caroline Pidgeon's London Liberal Democrats", "Christian Peoples Alliance": "Christian Peoples Alliance", "Conservative Party": "Conservative Party", "Green Party": "Green Party", "Labour Party": "Labour Party", "Respect (George Galloway)": "Respect (George Galloway)", "The House Party - Homes for Londoners": "The House Party - Homes for Londoners", "UK Independence Party (UKIP)": "UK Independence Party (UKIP)", "Women's Equality Party": "Women's Equality Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 663, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 273}, "n_stations_flagged": 273, "created_at": "2026-06-24T21:38:19.368871", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 33, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.721, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.961, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.854, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.787, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.721, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.961, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.787, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.04, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.04, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 663}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "51c4df697df34fe6919296a6459db20d", "name": "London 2016 \u2014 Mayor (1st choice) per ward", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2016, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "GLA 2016 Mayoral election, 1st-preference votes per ward (London Elects / London Datastore).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Sadiq Aman Khan - Labour Party": "Sadiq Aman Khan - Labour Party", "Zac Goldsmith - The Conservative Party": "Zac Goldsmith - The Conservative Party", "Sian Rebecca Berry - Green Party": "Sian Rebecca Berry - Green Party", "Caroline Valerie Pidgeon - London Liberal Democrats": "Caroline Valerie Pidgeon - London Liberal Democrats", "Peter Robin Whittle - UK Independence Party (UKIP)": "Peter Robin Whittle - UK Independence Party (UKIP)", "David Furness - British National Party": "David Furness - British National Party", "George Galloway - Respect (George Galloway)": "George Galloway - Respect (George Galloway)", "Paul Golding - Britain First": "Paul Golding - Britain First", "Lee Harris - Cannabis is Safer than Alcohol": "Lee Harris - Cannabis is Safer than Alcohol", "Ankit Love - One Love Party": "Ankit Love - One Love Party", "Sophie Walker - Women's Equality Party": "Sophie Walker - Women's Equality Party", "Prince Zylinski - Independent": "Prince Zylinski - Independent"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 663, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 164}, "n_stations_flagged": 164, "created_at": "2026-06-24T21:38:15.281422", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 33, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.721, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.961, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.854, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.787, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.721, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.961, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.787, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.04, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.04, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 663}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "27b5624b07654d0bb69dfafcfee3c3b9", "name": "London 2012 \u2014 Assembly London-wide (list) per ward", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2012, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "GLA 2012 London Assembly London-wide (PR list) votes per ward.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"British National Party": "British National Party", "Christian Peoples Alliance - Supporting Traditional Marriage": "Christian Peoples Alliance - Supporting Traditional Marriage", "Conservative Party": "Conservative Party", "English Democrats - \"Putting England First!\"": "English Democrats - \"Putting England First!\"", "Green Party": "Green Party", "Labour Party": "Labour Party", "London Liberal Democrats": "London Liberal Democrats", "National Front Putting Londoners First": "National Front Putting Londoners First", "The House Party - Homes For Londoners": "The House Party - Homes For Londoners", "Trade Unionist And Socialist Coalition": "Trade Unionist And Socialist Coalition", "UK Independence Party": "UK Independence Party", "Rathy Alagaratnam": "Rathy Alagaratnam", "Ijaz Hayat": "Ijaz Hayat"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 658, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 376}, "n_stations_flagged": 376, "created_at": "2026-06-24T21:38:11.221051", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 33, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.766, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.965, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.868, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.804, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.766, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.965, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.961, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.396, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.748, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.596, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.399, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.743, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.04, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.04, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 658}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "783df0ea831d4189b7ea605a6614dacb", "name": "London 2012 \u2014 Mayor (1st choice) per ward", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2012, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "GLA 2012 Mayoral election, 1st-preference votes per ward (London Datastore).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Siobhan Benita": "Siobhan Benita", "Carlos Cortiglia - British National Party": "Carlos Cortiglia - British National Party", "Boris Johnson - The Conservative Party Candidate": "Boris Johnson - The Conservative Party Candidate", "Jenny Jones - Green Party": "Jenny Jones - Green Party", "Ken Livingstone - The Labour Party Candidate": "Ken Livingstone - The Labour Party Candidate", "Brian Paddick - London Liberal Democrats": "Brian Paddick - London Liberal Democrats", "Lawrence James Webb - Fresh Choice for London": "Lawrence James Webb - Fresh Choice for London"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 658, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 113}, "n_stations_flagged": 113, "created_at": "2026-06-24T21:38:07.015327", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 33, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.766, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.965, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.868, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.804, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.766, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.965, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.961, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.396, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.748, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.596, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.399, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.743, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.04, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.04, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 658}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "15092aee1b10458184e9211842b7caab", "name": "Dominican Republic 2024 \u2014 Presidential per-colegio (18K)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominican Republic", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Dominican Republic 2024 general, presidential (19 May 2024), per colegio electoral (18,495). Luis Abinader (PRM-led alliance) won in the first round (57.4%); FP/L. Fern\u00e1ndez 28.9%; PLD/Mart\u00ednez 10.4%. PARTY-LEVEL ballot lines (34 parties): JCE publishes per-colegio results by party, and DR alliance arrastre means certified candidate totals do not decompose uniquely into party columns, so the faithful per-party data is shipped (PRM is the winner column at 48.4% of valid; the alliance lifts Abinader to 57.4%). Source: JCE Portal de Transparencia XLSX EntryId=30612. cast=EMITIDOS, valid=VALIDOS(=\u03a3party), invalid=NULOS+OBS. registered not published per colegio (unavailable). [registered not published per-colegio \u2192 synth registered=0; per-colegio turnout not computable.] [167 overseas/special COD_COL=9999 rows have cast=0 with valid>0 (real votes, no per-row cast recorded) \u2192 negative invalid clamped to 0; national valid/cast still reconcile to certified exactly.]", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_prm": "PRM \u2014 Partido Revolucionario Moderno (Abinader)", "votes_pld": "PLD \u2014 Partido de la Liberaci\u00f3n Dominicana (Mart\u00ednez)", "votes_fp": "FP \u2014 Fuerza del Pueblo (L. Fern\u00e1ndez)", "votes_prd": "PRD \u2014 Partido Revolucionario Dominicano (Vargas)", "votes_prsc": "PRSC \u2014 Partido Reformista Social Cristiano", "votes_alpais": "ALPAIS", "votes_dxc": "DxC \u2014 Dominicanos por el Cambio", "votes_pun": "PUN", "votes_bis": "BIS \u2014 Bloque Institucional Socialdem\u00f3crata", "votes_phd": "PHD \u2014 Partido Humanista Dominicano", "votes_pcr": "PCR", "votes_prsd": "PRSD", "votes_moda": "MODA", "votes_f_amplio": "Frente Amplio (Cabrera)", "votes_apd": "APD", "votes_pp": "PP", "votes_plr": "PLR", "votes_ppc": "PPC", "votes_pqdc": "PQDC", "votes_udc": "UDC", "votes_pal": "PAL", "votes_fnp": "FNP", "votes_pri": "PRI", "votes_pdp": "PDP", "votes_pnvc": "PNVC", "votes_pasove": "PASOVE", "votes_ppt": "PPT (Severino)", "votes_gens": "GENS \u2014 Generaci\u00f3n de Servidores (Pe\u00f1a)", "votes_od": "OD \u2014 Opci\u00f3n Democr\u00e1tica (Antares)", "votes_psc": "PSC", "votes_pdi": "PDI", "votes_ped": "PED \u2014 (Espaillat)", "votes_ppg": "PPG", "votes_js": "JS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18495, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 18313, "registered_not_positive": 18495, "cast_valid_mismatch": 167}, "n_stations_flagged": 18495, "created_at": "2026-06-23T19:20:46.678138", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.63, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.71, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.495, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.63, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.611, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.104, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.526, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.091, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.773, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.368, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.436, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.495, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.495, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.399, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.399, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.562, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.899, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18495}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f4fc633642bb49288d5bf1c423d85e54", "name": "Panama 2024 \u2014 Presidential per-mesa (7K)", "metadata": {"country": "Panama", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Panama 2024 general, single-round presidential (5 May 2024), per mesa (7,574 mesas). Jos\u00e9 Ra\u00fal Mulino (Realizando Metas) won ~34%. Source: GitHub civic mirror eeemda/pa_elecciones_2024 (data/clean/resultados_presidente.csv) of the official Tribunal Electoral TER \u2014 both official TE hosts decommissioned. LONG->wide (alliances double-list a candidate; per-candidate votes summed within mesa). registered=electores, cast=votos_emitidos, valid=votos_validos(=\u03a3cand), invalid=blancos+nulos.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_carrizo": "Jos\u00e9 Gabriel Gaby Carrizo (PRD)", "votes_mulino": "Jos\u00e9 Ra\u00fal Mulino (ALIANZA)", "votes_caldern": "Maribel Gord\u00f3n Calder\u00f3n (LP2)", "votes_torrijos": "Mart\u00edn Torrijos (POPULAR)", "votes_arrocha": "Meliton Alejandro Arrocha (PAIS)", "votes_lombana": "Ricardo Lombana (MOCA)", "votes_roux": "Romulo Roux (PAN)", "votes_lu": "Zulay Leyset Rodr\u00edguez Lu (LP1)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7574, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1, "registered_not_positive": 117, "cast_gt_registered": 171, "votes_gt_valid": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 173, "created_at": "2026-06-23T19:04:05.304107", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.751, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.945, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.728, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.578, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.751, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.826, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.553, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.24, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.479, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.42, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.578, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.578, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.471, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.471, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.888, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.484, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.484, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7574}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b563495f240c482ba517540f413a618c", "name": "Guatemala 2023 \u2014 Presidential R2 per-JRV (24K)", "metadata": {"country": "Guatemala", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Guatemala 2023 general, presidential round 2 (20 Aug 2023), per JRV/mesa (24,585 casillas). R2 runoff: Bernardo Ar\u00e9valo (Semilla) 60.9% def. Sandra Torres (UNE) 39.1%. Source: TSE TREP JSON host primeraeleccion/segundaeleccion.trep.gt (ultimoCorte.json -> gtm2023_tc1_e{N}.json, gzip). cast=fSE, registered=info.lNominal, valid=fSV(=\u03a3cand), invalid=fVN(nulos)+fVB(blancos).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_op15": "Sandra Torres (UNE)", "votes_op38": "Bernardo Ar\u00e9valo (SEMILLA)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 24585, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 38, "cast_gt_registered": 15, "invalid_gt_cast": 50, "cast_valid_mismatch": 428}, "n_stations_flagged": 448, "created_at": "2026-06-23T19:02:58.192728", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.887, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.736, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.506, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.338, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.349, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.37, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.593, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.281, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.32, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.338, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.338, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.228, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.228, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.696, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 24585}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4c6f205ce0dd4a64925b3d2194746ae3", "name": "Guatemala 2023 \u2014 Presidential R1 per-JRV (24K)", "metadata": {"country": "Guatemala", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Guatemala 2023 general, presidential round 1 (25 Jun 2023), per JRV/mesa (24,585 casillas). R2 runoff: Bernardo Ar\u00e9valo (Semilla) 60.9% def. Sandra Torres (UNE) 39.1%. Source: TSE TREP JSON host primeraeleccion/segundaeleccion.trep.gt (ultimoCorte.json -> gtm2023_tc1_e{N}.json, gzip). cast=fSE, registered=info.lNominal, valid=fSV(=\u03a3cand), invalid=fVN(nulos)+fVB(blancos).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_op15": "Sandra Torres (UNE)", "votes_op32": "AZUL", "votes_op41": "VALOR UNIONISTA", "votes_op33": "CABAL", "votes_op23": "TODOS", "votes_op36": "VAMOS", "votes_op28": "PHG", "votes_op30": "PR", "votes_op34": "PIN", "votes_op11": "ELEFANTE", "votes_op18": "VICTORIA", "votes_op38": "Bernardo Ar\u00e9valo (SEMILLA)", "votes_op16": "FCN-NACION", "votes_op13": "PPN", "votes_op37": "UR", "votes_op57": "URNG-MAIZ WINAQ", "votes_op20": "CREO", "votes_op26": "BIEN", "votes_op17": "VIVA", "votes_op12": "MI FAMILIA", "votes_op31": "CAMBIO", "votes_op35": "VOS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 24585, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 544, "cast_gt_registered": 14, "invalid_gt_cast": 171, "cast_valid_mismatch": 838}, "n_stations_flagged": 1232, "created_at": "2026-06-23T19:01:40.403927", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.887, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.736, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.506, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.338, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.349, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.37, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.593, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.281, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.32, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.338, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.338, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.228, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.228, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.696, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 24585}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1c33d0a213724b508f612908ead52f53", "name": "us_wi_2024_senate_primary_R", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Hovde 86.2% \u2014 OK", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Hovde": "Hovde", "Barman": "Barman", "Raveendran": "Raveendran", "Scattering": "Scattering"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 72, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 72, "cast_gt_registered": 72}, "n_stations_flagged": 72, "created_at": "2026-06-19T17:43:56.672642", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 72}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2ef48d01867345eeb4c0ceace7888f89", "name": "us_mi_2024_senate_primary_R", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Rogers 63.2% (def Amash 15.6%) \u2014 OK", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Rogers": "Rogers", "Amash": "Amash", "Pensler": "Pensler", "ODonnell": "ODonnell"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 83, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 83, "registered_not_positive": 83}, "n_stations_flagged": 83, "created_at": "2026-06-19T17:43:55.650538", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 83}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "68e63982f49946dbb7284471d8937668", "name": "us_mi_2024_senate_primary_D", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Slotkin 76.3% \u2014 OK", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Slotkin": "Slotkin", "Harper": "Harper"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 83, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 83, "registered_not_positive": 83}, "n_stations_flagged": 83, "created_at": "2026-06-19T17:43:54.581303", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 83}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "67c5d9036c5d4e07af007f2ca989e497", "name": "us_tx_2024_senate_primary_D", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Allred 58.9% \u2014 OK", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Allred": "Allred", "Gutierrez": "Gutierrez", "Gonzalez": "Gonzalez", "Gomez": "Gomez", "Sherman": "Sherman", "Hassan": "Hassan", "Keough": "Keough", "Prilliman": "Prilliman", "Tchenko": "Tchenko"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 254, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 252, "registered_not_positive": 254}, "n_stations_flagged": 254, "created_at": "2026-06-19T17:43:53.111261", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 254}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6cc8376ceecd401b9b8cef62ea366fec", "name": "us_ca_2024_senate_primary_top_two", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Schiff 31.6% & Garvey 31.5% both advance (top-two) \u2014 OK", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Schiff": "Schiff", "Garvey": "Garvey", "Porter": "Porter", "Lee": "Lee", "Early": "Early", "Bradley": "Bradley", "Pascucci": "Pascucci", "Bassett": "Bassett", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 58, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 58, "cast_gt_registered": 58}, "n_stations_flagged": 58, "created_at": "2026-06-19T17:43:52.107793", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 58}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8e1800c4a54641fa92d938dcff9eb132", "name": "us_md_2024_senate_primary_D", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Alsobrooks 53.4% (Trone 42.8%) \u2014 OK", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Alsobrooks": "Alsobrooks", "Trone": "Trone", "Perez": "Perez", "Cobb": "Cobb", "Frydenborg": "Frydenborg", "Griffin": "Griffin", "Crews": "Crews", "Wildman": "Wildman", "Houton": "Houton", "Seuferer": "Seuferer"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 24, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 24, "registered_not_positive": 24}, "n_stations_flagged": 24, "created_at": "2026-06-19T17:43:51.208871", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 24}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7be9dbdfc9724721bfbefbb929b7e635", "name": "us_oh_2024_senate_primary_R", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Moreno 50.5% (Dolan 32.9%, LaRose 16.7%) \u2014 OK exact", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Moreno": "Moreno", "LaRose": "LaRose", "Dolan": "Dolan"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 88, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-19T17:43:50.226509", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 88}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5e17fdaf82a44d0fb27a6f1668451de7", "name": "us_nc_2024_governor_primary_D", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "other", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Stein 69.6% \u2014 OK", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Stein": "Stein", "Morgan": "Morgan", "Booker": "Booker", "Williams": "Williams", "Foxx": "Foxx"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 100, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 100, "registered_not_positive": 100}, "n_stations_flagged": 100, "created_at": "2026-06-19T17:43:49.271826", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 100}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d20b375240684da7be847cc8c878d33c", "name": "us_nc_2024_governor_primary_R", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "other", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Robinson 64.8% \u2014 OK (3rd was Graham, not Walker)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Robinson": "Robinson", "Folwell": "Folwell", "Graham": "Graham"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 100, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 100, "registered_not_positive": 100}, "n_stations_flagged": 100, "created_at": "2026-06-19T17:43:48.268039", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 100}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1e715db7bb804c6baf0487918f1762c3", "name": "us_wv_2024_governor_primary_R", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "other", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Morrisey 33.3% \u2014 OK (field is Capito/Miller/Warner, not Justice-Cole)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Morrisey": "Morrisey", "Capito": "Capito", "Miller": "Miller", "Warner": "Warner", "Roberts": "Roberts", "Christian": "Christian"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 55, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 2, "registered_not_positive": 55, "cast_gt_registered": 53}, "n_stations_flagged": 55, "created_at": "2026-06-19T17:43:47.341614", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 55}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "92cc877d1b25498eaa73940c7c14eecd", "name": "us_az_2024_senate_primary_R", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Lake 55.4% (def Lamb 39.1%) \u2014 OK", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Lake": "Lake", "Lamb": "Lamb", "Reye": "Reye", "Write_in": "Write_in"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 5, "registered_not_positive": 4, "invalid_gt_cast": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-06-19T17:43:46.446904", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 13}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d4b5625522584f609d3672b01f2dc032", "name": "Wisconsin 2022 Governor primary (Republican), county-level", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "other", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Michels 47.1% def. Kleefisch 42.0% \u2014 matches official (Tim Michels won R primary)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Fischer": "Fischer", "Kleefisch": "Kleefisch", "Michels": "Michels", "Nicholson": "Nicholson", "Other": "Other", "Ramthun": "Ramthun"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 72, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 72, "cast_gt_registered": 72}, "n_stations_flagged": 72, "created_at": "2026-06-19T17:43:45.366242", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 72}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9642b7e75e854b499168e8d5bdff8206", "name": "Georgia 2022 Governor primary (Republican), county-level", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "other", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Kemp 73.8% def. Perdue 21.7% \u2014 matches official (Kemp def. Perdue big). 158/159 counties (1 county file absent from SoS zip)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Davis": "Davis", "Kemp": "Kemp", "Perdue": "Perdue", "Taylor": "Taylor", "Williams": "Williams"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 158, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 158, "cast_gt_registered": 158}, "n_stations_flagged": 158, "created_at": "2026-06-19T17:43:44.161216", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 158}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "81d32ecbf3e545fd9f6bd0aed3c62a66", "name": "Colorado 2022 Governor primary (Republican), county-level", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "other", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ganahl 53.9% def. Lopez 46.1% \u2014 matches official (Heidi Ganahl won R primary)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Ganahl": "Ganahl", "Lopez": "Lopez"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 64, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 64, "registered_not_positive": 64}, "n_stations_flagged": 64, "created_at": "2026-06-19T17:43:43.224661", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 64}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "557680e449c843638f7d8fe36d5c73dd", "name": "Minnesota 2022 Governor primary (Republican), county-level", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "other", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Jensen 89.3% \u2014 matches official; county-sum == statewide Governor.txt EXACTLY per candidate", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Carney": "Carney", "Jensen": "Jensen", "Lacey": "Lacey"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 87, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 87, "registered_not_positive": 87}, "n_stations_flagged": 87, "created_at": "2026-06-19T17:43:42.131221", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 87}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d68618df80b247c9afb0f96dd332db67", "name": "Pennsylvania 2022 Governor primary (Republican), county-level", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "other", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Mastriano 43.8% def. Barletta 20.2%, McSwain 15.8% \u2014 matches official", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Barletta": "Barletta", "Corman": "Corman", "Gale": "Gale", "Gerow": "Gerow", "Hart": "Hart", "Mastriano": "Mastriano", "McSwain": "McSwain", "White": "White", "Zama": "Zama"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 67, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 67, "registered_not_positive": 67}, "n_stations_flagged": 67, "created_at": "2026-06-19T17:43:41.127959", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 67}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "937caa402bf744d6befe36ed57ba88c2", "name": "Maryland 2022 Governor primary (Republican), county-level", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "other", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Cox 52.0% def. Schulz 43.5% \u2014 matches official (Dan Cox won R primary)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Cox": "Cox", "Ficker": "Ficker", "Schulz": "Schulz", "Werner": "Werner"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 24, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 24, "cast_gt_registered": 24}, "n_stations_flagged": 24, "created_at": "2026-06-19T17:43:40.296709", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 24}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fe9e6bf0422d4fe397d2fdc458db45fa", "name": "Maryland 2022 Governor primary (Democratic), county-level", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "other", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Moore 32.4% def. Perez 30.1%, Franchot 21.1% \u2014 matches official (Wes Moore won D primary)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Baker": "Baker", "Baron": "Baron", "Franchot": "Franchot", "Gansler": "Gansler", "Jaffe": "Jaffe", "Jain": "Jain", "King": "King", "Moore": "Moore", "Perez": "Perez", "Segal": "Segal"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 24, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 24, "cast_gt_registered": 24}, "n_stations_flagged": 24, "created_at": "2026-06-19T17:43:39.528650", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 24}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e033424a810f41c8854b0954bef5c03c", "name": "GA 2022 US Senate Republican primary (county)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Walker 803,560 = 68.2% \u2014 WINNER (Herschel Walker won R primary) MATCHES; valid sum == statewide voteTotal exactly", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Walker": "Walker", "Black": "Black", "Saddler": "Saddler", "Clark": "Clark", "King": "King", "McColumn": "McColumn"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 159, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 159, "registered_not_positive": 159}, "n_stations_flagged": 159, "created_at": "2026-06-19T17:43:31.058797", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 159}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7a9c41949c7e41608f0188dc94109721", "name": "AL 2022 US Senate Republican primary RUNOFF (county)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Britt 253,250 = 63.0% beat Brooks 37.0% \u2014 WINNER (Katie Britt won runoff) MATCHES", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Britt": "Britt", "Brooks": "Brooks"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 67, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 36, "cast_valid_mismatch": 10, "registered_not_positive": 35}, "n_stations_flagged": 40, "created_at": "2026-06-19T17:43:30.032159", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 67}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "10511a261f074bed84ba7e7a68d9d741", "name": "AL 2022 US Senate Republican primary (county)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Britt 289,423 = 44.8% (1st, no majority) + Brooks 2nd -> advanced to runoff. MATCHES (forced runoff, Britt led)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Britt": "Britt", "Brooks": "Brooks", "Durant": "Durant", "Schafer": "Schafer", "Dupriest": "Dupriest", "Boddie": "Boddie"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 67, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 22, "registered_not_positive": 33, "cast_gt_registered": 37}, "n_stations_flagged": 49, "created_at": "2026-06-19T17:43:29.106391", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 67}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "377872ff11384356b11389e283c5a074", "name": "NC 2022 US Senate Democratic primary (county)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Beasley 501,755 = 81.1% \u2014 WINNER (Cheri Beasley won D primary) MATCHES", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Beasley": "Beasley", "Carr": "Carr", "Hammond": "Hammond", "Williams": "Williams", "Johnson": "Johnson", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 100, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 100, "cast_gt_registered": 100}, "n_stations_flagged": 100, "created_at": "2026-06-19T17:43:28.021510", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 100}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3f64db5791304001853ee0c33144dd1e", "name": "NC 2022 US Senate Republican primary (county)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Budd 448,095 = 58.6% \u2014 WINNER (Ted Budd won R primary) MATCHES", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Budd": "Budd", "McCrory": "McCrory", "Walker": "Walker", "Eastman": "Eastman", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 100, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 100, "registered_not_positive": 100}, "n_stations_flagged": 100, "created_at": "2026-06-19T17:43:27.025756", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 100}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2683ef8fb39841f199eaf4095e9340eb", "name": "United States 2012 Republican Presidential Primary (county)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2012, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "County-level 2012 republican presidential primary, from OpenElections (CC0). 1,436 counties across 19 states. Romney won (Santorum 2nd, Gingrich 3rd). Partial coverage (OpenElections digitization). registered not published; cast=valid=\u03a3candidate.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Gingrich": "Gingrich", "Other": "Other", "Paul": "Paul", "Romney": "Romney", "Santorum": "Santorum"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1436, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1436, "cast_gt_registered": 1412}, "n_stations_flagged": 1436, "created_at": "2026-06-19T10:12:03.579117", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.78, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.889, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.842, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.984, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.996, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.734, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.715, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.22, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.053, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.053, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Republican", "margin": 23.42, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1436}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c3e64e559ce547829296baf9d53f1166", "name": "United States 2008 Democratic Presidential Primary (county)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2008, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "County-level 2008 democratic presidential primary, from OpenElections (CC0). 1,159 counties across 14 states. Obama won the historic primary (Clinton 2nd, Edwards 3rd). Partial coverage (OpenElections digitization). registered not published; cast=valid=\u03a3candidate.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Clinton": "Clinton", "Edwards": "Edwards", "Obama": "Obama", "Other": "Other", "Uncommitted": "Uncommitted"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1159, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1159, "cast_gt_registered": 1156}, "n_stations_flagged": 1159, "created_at": "2026-06-19T10:11:59.521503", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.776, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.88, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.9, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.845, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.776, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.983, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.996, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.715, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.579, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Republican", "margin": 35.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1159}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2e431452192c48608d10c3a8f4a0d213", "name": "United States 2008 Republican Presidential Primary (county)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2008, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "County-level 2008 republican presidential primary, from OpenElections (CC0). 1,156 counties across 14 states. McCain won (Huckabee 2nd, Romney 3rd). Partial coverage (OpenElections digitization). registered not published; cast=valid=\u03a3candidate.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Giuliani": "Giuliani", "Huckabee": "Huckabee", "McCain": "McCain", "Other": "Other", "Paul": "Paul", "Romney": "Romney", "Thompson": "Thompson"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1156, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1156, "cast_gt_registered": 1135}, "n_stations_flagged": 1156, "created_at": "2026-06-19T10:11:55.647317", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.776, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.88, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.9, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.845, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.776, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.983, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.996, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.715, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.579, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Republican", "margin": 35.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1156}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1b53a7d2c4724a72b085f101c3187f4e", "name": "Montreal 2021 municipal election - Mayor (Maire de Montreal), per bureau de vote", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Plante (Projet Montreal) 52.1% (217,986) def. Coderre (Ensemble Montreal) 38.0% (158,751); Holness 7.2% -- matches official 2021 Montreal municipal election result exactly", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Bernardo (Independent)": "Bernardo (Independent)", "Coderre (Ensemble Montreal)": "Coderre (Ensemble Montreal)", "Duval (Independent)": "Duval (Independent)", "Holness (Mouvement Montreal)": "Holness (Mouvement Montreal)", "Hu (Independent)": "Hu (Independent)", "Jules (Independent)": "Jules (Independent)", "Menard (Montreal 2021)": "Menard (Montreal 2021)", "Mourkes (Independent)": "Mourkes (Independent)", "Plante (Projet Montreal)": "Plante (Projet Montreal)", "Thibodeau (Action Montreal)": "Thibodeau (Action Montreal)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3930, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 3930, "cast_gt_registered": 3890}, "n_stations_flagged": 3930, "created_at": "2026-06-19T10:01:30.637676", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.846, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.904, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.749, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3930}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f01f7e53c6a146c2ab37b088ee175a98", "name": "Atlanta 2021 mayoral runoff (Fulton portion)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Andre Dickens WON; Fulton-portion 62.88% (44,655 vs Moore 26,365) \u2014 matches Clarity contest totals exactly; citywide certified ~63.9% (small DeKalb Atlanta slice not included, winner unaffected)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Dickens": "Dickens", "Moore": "Moore"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 169, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-19T10:01:29.179233", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.754, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.681, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.821, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.756, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.681, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.429, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.6, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.068, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.068, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 169}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "782819384a1c47e4a6796e1d4c6a271c", "name": "Boston 2021 mayoral general", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Michelle Wu (D) WON 63.96% (91,794) vs Annissa Essaibi George 51,125 \u2014 matches official ~64-36 and the PDF page-1 ward summary exactly", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Wu": "Wu", "Essaibi_George": "Essaibi_George", "Others": "Others"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 255, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 255, "registered_not_positive": 255}, "n_stations_flagged": 255, "created_at": "2026-06-19T10:01:27.204629", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.754, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.681, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.821, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.756, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.681, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.429, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.6, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.068, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.068, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 255}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b24d7af34adf401985aaa3e9f1b1f998", "name": "Italy comunali 2024 (8-9 June, first round) \u2014 Sindaci per-comune \u2014 MAJOR-CITY SUBSET", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Validated vs Wikipedia 2024 comunali: Firenze Funaro (PD/centrosinistra) led R1 43.2% (won runoff), FdI/Schmidt 2nd; Modena Mezzetti (centrosinistra) won R1 outright (PD list 40.6%, candidate 63.8%); Livorno Salvetti (centrosinistra) ~51.7%; Potenza centrodestra. All consistent with official.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"FdI": "FdI", "Lega": "Lega", "FI": "FI", "PD": "PD", "M5S": "M5S", "AVS": "AVS", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-06-19T10:01:26.472578", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.908, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.784, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.687, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.687, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.693, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.693, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.182, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.182, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 11}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a1b5548b4481448d98ef86cd4d726502", "name": "Spain 2023 Municipal", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "PP 31.88% > PSOE 28.44% > VOX 7.27% (national vote share, Sigma over 8,087 municipios) \u2014 matches official result: PP won most votes/councillors nationally, sealing path to July 2023 general. PASS.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_pp": "Pp", "votes_psoe": "Psoe", "votes_vox": "Vox", "votes_sumar_up": "Sumar Up", "votes_erc": "Erc", "votes_jxcat": "Jxcat", "votes_eh_bildu": "Eh Bildu", "votes_pnv": "Pnv", "votes_bng": "Bng", "votes_cc": "Cc", "votes_other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8087, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-06-19T10:01:05.072676", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.831, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.269, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.759, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.269, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.067, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.067, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8087}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "884aec8d9a644006a3841da7330ef5b5", "name": "United States 2024 Democratic Presidential Primary (county)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "County-level 2024 democratic presidential primary \u2014 OpenElections + state SoS (NC/CA/FL/NV/etc.). 2,111 counties across 33 states. Biden (D) won. registered not published; cast=valid=\u03a3candidate.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Biden": "Biden", "Other": "Other", "Phillips": "Phillips", "Uncommitted": "Uncommitted", "Williamson": "Williamson"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2111, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2110, "registered_not_positive": 2111}, "n_stations_flagged": 2111, "created_at": "2026-06-19T09:18:34.377935", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2111}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8ed468dca42947299f0cf519983df796", "name": "United States 2024 Republican Presidential Primary (county)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "County-level 2024 republican presidential primary \u2014 OpenElections + state SoS (NC/CA/FL/NV/etc.). 2,082 counties across 32 states. Trump (R) won; Haley 2nd; 'None of these'/withdrawn \u2192 Other. registered not published; cast=valid=\u03a3candidate.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Christie": "Christie", "DeSantis": "DeSantis", "Haley": "Haley", "Other": "Other", "Ramaswamy": "Ramaswamy", "Trump": "Trump"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2082, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 2082, "cast_gt_registered": 2082}, "n_stations_flagged": 2082, "created_at": "2026-06-19T09:18:28.344701", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2082}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "da395ad2d03e49a9aa75024c2f24dc95", "name": "Chile 2024 Municipal \u2014 Concejales (council) by list/pact per comuna", "metadata": {"country": "Chile", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Concejales (open-list PR): Chile Vamos split across list I (RN) 15.51% + list E (UDI-EVOPOLI) 12.63% = ~28% largest force; Chile Mucho Mejor (centre-left, U) 15.06%, Por Chile Seguimos (govt FA/PC, A) 14.01%, Republicanos (Y) 13.82% \u2014 matches 'Chile Vamos best municipal since 2016'. ALCALDE per-comuna winner check (validation only, not the built dataset): Chile Vamos won 123 mayoralties, Contigo Chile Mejor 111, Independientes 103, Republicanos 8 \u2014 matches known 2024 outcome. National turnout 84.95% (official 84.83%); registered total 15,450,377 matches official exactly.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"lista_a_por_chile_seguimos": "lista_a_por_chile_seguimos", "lista_b_izquierda_ecologista_popular": "lista_b_izquierda_ecologista_popular", "lista_e_chile_vamos_udi_evopoli_e_independientes": "lista_e_chile_vamos_udi_evopoli_e_independientes", "lista_f_partido_social_cristiano_e_independientes": "lista_f_partido_social_cristiano_e_independientes", "lista_g_verdes_liberales_por_una_comuna_segura": "lista_g_verdes_liberales_por_una_comuna_segura", "lista_i_chile_vamos_renovaci_n_nacional_independientes": "lista_i_chile_vamos_renovaci_n_nacional_independientes", "lista_independientes_fuera_de_pacto": "lista_independientes_fuera_de_pacto", "lista_k_izquierda_de_trabajadores_e_independientes": "lista_k_izquierda_de_trabajadores_e_independientes", "lista_p_partido_de_la_gente_e_independientes": "lista_p_partido_de_la_gente_e_independientes", "lista_r_centro_democratico": "lista_r_centro_democratico", "lista_t_tu_comuna_radical": "lista_t_tu_comuna_radical", "lista_u_chile_mucho_mejor": "lista_u_chile_mucho_mejor", "lista_x_ecologistas_animalistas_e_independientes": "lista_x_ecologistas_animalistas_e_independientes", "lista_y_republicanos_e_independientes": "lista_y_republicanos_e_independientes"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 346, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-19T00:17:01.122612", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.84, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.918, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.845, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.786, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.84, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.531, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.786, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.075, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.075, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.928, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 346}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1e87f1dad14a4517adf2c6e34087cdc6", "name": "Toronto 2022 municipal \u2014 Mayor (poll-by-poll)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Tory John 342,158 = 62.00% (EXACT match to certified/Wikipedia 342,158, 62.00%); Penalosa Gil 98,525 (17.85%); Brown Chloe-Marie 34,821 (6.31%). Total valid 551,890.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_acton_blake": "Acton Blake", "votes_arrobas_avraham": "Arrobas Avraham", "votes_atkinson_darren": "Atkinson Darren", "votes_brown_chloe_marie": "Brown Chloe Marie", "votes_buckingham_drew": "Buckingham Drew", "votes_caputolan_elvira": "Caputolan Elvira", "votes_clarke_kevin": "Clarke Kevin", "votes_climenhaga_sarah": "Climenhaga Sarah", "votes_dcruze_phillip": "Dcruze Phillip", "votes_deville_cory": "Deville Cory", "votes_efimovskikh_alexey": "Efimovskikh Alexey", "votes_gamk_isabella": "Gamk Isabella", "votes_gupta_arjun": "Gupta Arjun", "votes_handjis_peter": "Handjis Peter", "votes_hatton_robert": "Hatton Robert", "votes_hossain_monowar": "Hossain Monowar", "votes_hossain_soaad": "Hossain Soaad", "votes_jamal_khadijah": "Jamal Khadijah", "votes_langenfeld_kris": "Langenfeld Kris", "votes_letonja_john": "Letonja John", "votes_luk_tony": "Luk Tony", "votes_malek_ferin": "Malek Ferin", "votes_penalosa_gil": "Penalosa Gil", "votes_punwasi_stephen": "Punwasi Stephen", "votes_ren_e_donne": "Ren E Donne", "votes_schwartz_kyle": "Schwartz Kyle", "votes_singh_knia": "Singh Knia", "votes_srivastava_sandeep": "Srivastava Sandeep", "votes_tory_john": "Tory John", "votes_tull_reginald": "Tull Reginald", "votes_yan_jack": "Yan Jack"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1535, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1535, "cast_gt_registered": 1533}, "n_stations_flagged": 1535, "created_at": "2026-06-19T00:16:49.097876", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.846, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.904, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.848, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.745, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.644, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.644, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.887, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1535}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3327fa5d8201427ebfa8bb73dece5b41", "name": "Los Angeles 2022 General \u2014 Mayor (per precinct)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Bass 509,941 (54.8%) def Caruso 420,025 \u2014 matches certified 509,944/420,030 (3-5 vote canvass-vs-cert residual). Karen Bass won.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Bass": "Bass", "Caruso": "Caruso"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 951, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-19T00:16:45.654823", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 951}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3d1891e9debb43bb9a4130cfe6a21673", "name": "Houston 2023 Runoff \u2014 Mayor (per precinct, Harris County)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Whitmire 129,217 (65.2%) def Jackson Lee 68,819 \u2014 matches canvass Totals exactly; ~99.8% of citywide Whitmire, 98.5% of total (Fort Bend slice excluded). Winner correct.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Whitmire": "Whitmire", "Jackson_Lee": "Jackson_Lee"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 878, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2, "registered_not_positive": 127}, "n_stations_flagged": 127, "created_at": "2026-06-19T00:16:42.533379", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.857, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.789, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.44, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.61, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 878}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bddef4c3139240b6a67ed3ce5f74d8c5", "name": "Philadelphia 2023 Democratic Primary \u2014 Mayor (per division)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Parker 81,080 (32.6%) > Rhynhart 22.8% > Gym 22.0% > Domb 11.3% \u2014 matches official 9-way Dem primary; Cherelle Parker won.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Amen_Brown": "Amen_Brown", "Bloom": "Bloom", "Deleon": "Deleon", "Domb": "Domb", "Gray": "Gray", "Gym": "Gym", "Jeff_Brown": "Jeff_Brown", "Parker": "Parker", "Rhynhart": "Rhynhart", "Others": "Others"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1703, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1703, "cast_gt_registered": 1703}, "n_stations_flagged": 1703, "created_at": "2026-06-19T00:16:37.399872", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.857, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.789, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.44, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.61, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1703}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "730b4b10b78648d8b4955cd8efe838e4", "name": "Germany 2019 Kommunalwahl (municipal council)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2019, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Largest wave (9 states incl. Bremen/RLP/eastern). Weighted shares: Other 36.4% (local lists), CDU 22.1%, GR\u00dcNE 15.1%, SPD 13.8%, FDP 4.7%, AfD 4.0%, LINKE 3.3%. AfD lower than 2024 (7.6%) confirming the rising trend.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CDU": "CDU", "CSU": "CSU", "SPD": "SPD", "GR\u00dcNE": "GR\u00dcNE", "FDP": "FDP", "AfD": "AfD", "LINKE": "LINKE", "FREIE_W\u00c4HLER": "FREIE_W\u00c4HLER", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5862, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 5739, "votes_gt_valid": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 5739, "created_at": "2026-06-18T23:13:00.062370", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.881, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.95, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.878, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.831, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.779, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.013, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.013, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 5862}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a227c8d79ff640149ac69c98b9c0332e", "name": "Germany 2021 Kommunalwahl (municipal council)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "3 western states (Berlin/Hesse/Lower Saxony). Weighted shares: CDU 27.0% (top), SPD 23.5%, GR\u00dcNE 18.2%, Other 17.4%, FDP 6.5%, LINKE 3.6%, AfD 2.8%. CDU+SPD large blocs as expected for western municipalities.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CDU": "CDU", "CSU": "CSU", "SPD": "SPD", "GR\u00dcNE": "GR\u00dcNE", "FDP": "FDP", "AfD": "AfD", "LINKE": "LINKE", "FREIE_W\u00c4HLER": "FREIE_W\u00c4HLER", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1364, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1364}, "n_stations_flagged": 1364, "created_at": "2026-06-18T23:12:54.774733", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.863, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.814, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.016, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1364}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7d3e0c8f52d3476d82e10c2fe9783f99", "name": "Germany 2024 Kommunalwahl (municipal council)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Most-recent wave (7 states: BW/Brandenburg/MV/Saarland/Saxony/Saxony-Anhalt/Thuringia). Weighted shares: Other 38.3% (local W\u00e4hlergemeinschaften), CDU 23.1%, GR\u00dcNE 12.3%, SPD 12.2%, AfD 7.6% (clear rise vs 4.0% in 2019 and 1.5% in 2014), FDP 4.1%, LINKE 2.2%. CDU largest named party; AfD-rising-in-later-waves confirmed.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CDU": "CDU", "CSU": "CSU", "SPD": "SPD", "GR\u00dcNE": "GR\u00dcNE", "FDP": "FDP", "AfD": "AfD", "LINKE": "LINKE", "FREIE_W\u00c4HLER": "FREIE_W\u00c4HLER", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3558, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 3, "cast_valid_mismatch": 3558}, "n_stations_flagged": 3558, "created_at": "2026-06-18T23:12:45.015327", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.825, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.778, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.567, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3558}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "36d66828afbc489ca6680804d0d71b73", "name": "UK 2023 Local (Council) Elections \u2014 per ward", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Labour leads on votes (4,497,242 = 31.21%) over Conservative (4,464,542 = 30.99%, Lab +32,700) and wins the most seats (2,679 vs Conservative 2,270). Matches the known 2023 narrative: Conservatives lost the most seats, Labour + Lib Dems gained, Labour vote-share lead.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Conservative": "Conservative", "Labour": "Labour", "Liberal Democrat": "Liberal Democrat", "Green": "Green", "Reform UK": "Reform UK", "Independent": "Independent", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4797, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 4797, "cast_valid_mismatch": 2314, "registered_not_positive": 4797}, "n_stations_flagged": 4797, "created_at": "2026-06-18T23:12:31.469900", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.919, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.958, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.852, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.771, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.144, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.286, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.569, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.771, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.911, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.052, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.052, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4797}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0a14b36a77ec410d838dcd00c529c40c", "name": "Chicago 2023 Mayoral General / Round 1 (per-precinct)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Plurality leader Vallas 185,743 = 32.90%; Johnson 122,093 = 21.63%; Lightfoot 94,890 = 16.81%; Garcia 77,222 = 13.68%; Wilson 51,567 = 9.13% (564,524 ballots). All 9 candidates + write-ins reconcile EXACTLY to certified BOE/Wikipedia totals. No majority -> runoff.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Vallas": "Vallas", "Johnson": "Johnson", "Lightfoot": "Lightfoot", "Garcia": "Garcia", "Wilson": "Wilson", "Buckner": "Buckner", "Green": "Green", "King": "King", "Sawyer": "Sawyer", "WriteIn": "WriteIn"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1291, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1291, "cast_gt_registered": 1291}, "n_stations_flagged": 1291, "created_at": "2026-06-18T23:12:27.041169", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.857, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.789, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.44, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.61, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1291}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1fa59cc7f8a9475096ca12eb81fded44", "name": "Chicago 2023 Mayoral Runoff (per-precinct)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Brandon Johnson 319,481 votes = 52.16% def. Paul Vallas 293,033 = 47.84% (612,514 ballots). Grand-total table reconciles EXACTLY to certified BOE/Wikipedia totals.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Johnson": "Johnson", "Vallas": "Vallas"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1291, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1291, "registered_not_positive": 1291}, "n_stations_flagged": 1291, "created_at": "2026-06-18T23:12:23.050170", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.857, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.789, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.44, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.61, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1291}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d5e83b2455ee420f82f710d2e42f5783", "name": "United States 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary (county)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2020, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "County-level 2020 democratic presidential primary, from OpenElections (CC0, github-raw, openelections-data-{st}). 1,359 counties across 23 states. Biden won (Sanders 2nd, Warren 3rd). PARTIAL COVERAGE \u2014 OpenElections' primary digitization is incomplete (esp. 2024 \u2248 a third of states); this is the counties it has, not all 50 states. registered not published; cast=valid=\u03a3candidate votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Biden": "Biden", "Bloomberg": "Bloomberg", "Buttigieg": "Buttigieg", "Gabbard": "Gabbard", "Klobuchar": "Klobuchar", "Other": "Other", "Sanders": "Sanders", "Steyer": "Steyer", "Uncommitted": "Uncommitted", "Warren": "Warren", "Yang": "Yang"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1359, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1359, "registered_not_positive": 1359}, "n_stations_flagged": 1359, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:56:47.205494", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.754, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.681, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.815, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.734, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.681, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.473, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.429, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.917, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.928, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.085, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.085, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.901, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1359}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3421f406267b46ff82772de21bbeef22", "name": "United States 2016 Democratic Presidential Primary (county)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2016, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "County-level 2016 democratic presidential primary, from OpenElections (CC0, github-raw, openelections-data-{st}). 1,571 counties across 21 states. Clinton won (Sanders 2nd). PARTIAL COVERAGE \u2014 OpenElections' primary digitization is incomplete (esp. 2024 \u2248 a third of states); this is the counties it has, not all 50 states. registered not published; cast=valid=\u03a3candidate votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Clinton": "Clinton", "OMalley": "OMalley", "Other": "Other", "Sanders": "Sanders", "Uncommitted": "Uncommitted"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1571, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1571, "cast_gt_registered": 1570}, "n_stations_flagged": 1571, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:56:42.323225", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.259, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.885, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.83, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.259, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.594, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.554, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.495, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.068, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.068, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 14.13, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1571}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9c47b66e3360486b8525e99d94a911f7", "name": "United States 2016 Republican Presidential Primary (county)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2016, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "County-level 2016 republican presidential primary, from OpenElections (CC0, github-raw, openelections-data-{st}). 1,492 counties across 21 states. Trump won (Cruz 2nd, Kasich 3rd). PARTIAL COVERAGE \u2014 OpenElections' primary digitization is incomplete (esp. 2024 \u2248 a third of states); this is the counties it has, not all 50 states. registered not published; cast=valid=\u03a3candidate votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Bush": "Bush", "Carson": "Carson", "Cruz": "Cruz", "Kasich": "Kasich", "Other": "Other", "Rubio": "Rubio", "Trump": "Trump"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1492, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1491, "registered_not_positive": 1492}, "n_stations_flagged": 1492, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:56:37.802798", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.259, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.885, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.83, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.259, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.594, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.554, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.495, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.068, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.068, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 14.13, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1492}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7b105d88620648fda7247444c1157200", "name": "Philippines 2025 Senate (per-province)", "metadata": {"country": "Philippines", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "PASS \u2014 top 12 match official exactly: Go 26.92M, Aquino 20.90M, Dela Rosa 20.60M, E.Tulfo 17.07M, Pangilinan 15.29M, Marcoleta 15.14M, Lacson 15.07M, Sotto 14.80M, Cayetano 14.52M, Villar 13.58M, Lapid 13.33M, Marcos 13.26M", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Abalos, Benhur (PFP)": "Abalos, Benhur (PFP)", "Adonis, Jerome (MKBYN)": "Adonis, Jerome (MKBYN)", "Amad, Wilson (IND)": "Amad, Wilson (IND)", "Andamo, Nars Alyn (MKBYN)": "Andamo, Nars Alyn (MKBYN)", "Aquino, Bam (KNP)": "Aquino, Bam (KNP)", "Arambulo, Ronnel (MKBYN)": "Arambulo, Ronnel (MKBYN)", "Arellano, Ernesto (KTPNAN)": "Arellano, Ernesto (KTPNAN)", "Ballon, Roberto (IND)": "Ballon, Roberto (IND)", "Binay, Abby (NPC)": "Binay, Abby (NPC)", "Bondoc, Jimmy (PDPLBN)": "Bondoc, Jimmy (PDPLBN)", "Bong Revilla, Ramon, Jr. (LAKAS)": "Bong Revilla, Ramon, Jr. (LAKAS)", "Bosita, Colonel (IND)": "Bosita, Colonel (IND)", "Brosas, Arlene (MKBYN)": "Brosas, Arlene (MKBYN)", "Cabonegro, Roy (DPP)": "Cabonegro, Roy (DPP)", "Capuyan, Allen (PPP)": "Capuyan, Allen (PPP)", "Casi\u00f1o, Teddy (MKBYN)": "Casi\u00f1o, Teddy (MKBYN)", "Castro, Teacher France (MKBYN)": "Castro, Teacher France (MKBYN)", "Cayetano, Pia (NP)": "Cayetano, Pia (NP)", "D'angelo, David (BUNYOG)": "D'angelo, David (BUNYOG)", "De Alban, Attorney Angelo (IND)": "De Alban, Attorney Angelo (IND)", "De Guzman, Ka Leody (PLM)": "De Guzman, Ka Leody (PLM)", "Dela Rosa, Bato (PDPLBN)": "Dela Rosa, Bato (PDPLBN)", "Doringo, Nanay Mimi (MKBYN)": "Doringo, Nanay Mimi (MKBYN)", "Escobal, Arnel (PM)": "Escobal, Arnel (PM)", "Espiritu, Luke (PLM)": "Espiritu, Luke (PLM)", "Floranda, Mody Piston (MKBYN)": "Floranda, Mody Piston (MKBYN)", "Gamboa, Marc Louie (IND)": "Gamboa, Marc Louie (IND)", "Go, Bong Go (PDPLBN)": "Go, Bong Go (PDPLBN)", "Gonzales, Norberto (PDSP)": "Gonzales, Norberto (PDSP)", "Hinlo, Jayvee (PDPLBN)": "Hinlo, Jayvee (PDPLBN)", "Honasan, Gringo (RP)": "Honasan, Gringo (RP)", "Jose, Relly Jr. (KBL)": "Jose, Relly Jr. (KBL)", "Lacson, Ping (IND)": "Lacson, Ping (IND)", "Lambino, Raul (PDPLBN)": "Lambino, Raul (PDPLBN)", "Lapid, Lito (NPC)": "Lapid, Lito (NPC)", "Lee, Manoy Wilbert (AKSYON)": "Lee, Manoy Wilbert (AKSYON)", "Lidasan, Amirah (MKBYN)": "Lidasan, Amirah (MKBYN)", "Marcoleta, Rodante (IND)": "Marcoleta, Rodante (IND)", "Marcos, Imee R. (NP)": "Marcos, Imee R. (NP)", "Marquez, Norman (IND)": "Marquez, Norman (IND)", "Martinez, Eric (IND)": "Martinez, Eric (IND)", "Mata, Doc Marites (IND)": "Mata, Doc Marites (IND)", "Matula, Atty. Sonny (WPP)": "Matula, Atty. Sonny (WPP)", "Maza, Liza (MKBYN)": "Maza, Liza (MKBYN)", "Mendoza, Heidi (IND)": "Mendoza, Heidi (IND)", "Montemayor, Joey (IND)": "Montemayor, Joey (IND)", "Mustapha, Subair (WPP)": "Mustapha, Subair (WPP)", "Olivar, Jose Jessie (IND)": "Olivar, Jose Jessie (IND)", "Ong, Doc Willie (AKSYON)": "Ong, Doc Willie (AKSYON)", "Pacquiao, Manny Pacman (PFP)": "Pacquiao, Manny Pacman (PFP)", "Pangilinan, Kiko (LP)": "Pangilinan, Kiko (LP)", "Querubin, Ariel Porfirio (NP)": "Querubin, Ariel Porfirio (NP)", "Quiboloy, Apollo (IND)": "Quiboloy, Apollo (IND)", "Ramos, Danilo (MKBYN)": "Ramos, Danilo (MKBYN)", "Revillame, Willie Wil (IND)": "Revillame, Willie Wil (IND)", "Rodriguez, Atty. Vic (IND)": "Rodriguez, Atty. Vic (IND)", "Sahidulla, Nur-ana (IND)": "Sahidulla, Nur-ana (IND)", "Salvador, Phillip Ipe (PDPLBN)": "Salvador, Phillip Ipe (PDPLBN)", "Sotto, Tito (NPC)": "Sotto, Tito (NPC)", "Tapado, Michael Bongbong (PM)": "Tapado, Michael Bongbong (PM)", "Tolentino, Francis Tol (PFP)": "Tolentino, Francis Tol (PFP)", "Tulfo, Ben Bitag (IND)": "Tulfo, Ben Bitag (IND)", "Tulfo, Erwin (LAKAS)": "Tulfo, Erwin (LAKAS)", "Valbuena, Mar Manibela (IND)": "Valbuena, Mar Manibela (IND)", "Verceles, Leandro (IND)": "Verceles, Leandro (IND)", "Villar, Camille (NP)": "Villar, Camille (NP)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 92, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 92}, "n_stations_flagged": 92, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:46.854032", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.879, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.587, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.392, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.291, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.879, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.47, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.587, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.99, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.247, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.451, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.484, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.341, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.585, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.392, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.291, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.291, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.169, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.169, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.561, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.66, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.676, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 92}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f6983d7033484b568d2fb8bd6999dcc6", "name": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives PR (hirei) by prefecture", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "LDP 26.73% > CDP 21.20% > DPP 11.31% > Komeito 10.93% > Ishin 9.36%; exact match to official 2024 HoR PR result (LDP-Komeito lost majority, CDP gained)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"LDP": "LDP", "CDP": "CDP", "Ishin": "Ishin", "Komeito": "Komeito", "DPP": "DPP", "JCP": "JCP", "Reiwa": "Reiwa", "Sanseito": "Sanseito", "ConservativeParty": "ConservativeParty", "SDP": "SDP", "EuthanasiaStudy": "EuthanasiaStudy", "MinnaDeTsukuru": "MinnaDeTsukuru"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 47, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 47, "cast_gt_registered": 47}, "n_stations_flagged": 47, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:45.666868", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 47}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e94f192866364f36ad1a61a22d92cdc9", "name": "Japan 2025 House of Councillors PR (hirei) by prefecture", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "LDP 21.64% (record low) > DPP 12.88% > Sanseito 12.55% (surge, 7.43M) > CDP 12.50% > Komeito 8.80%; turnout 58.51% \u2014 matches Wikipedia/official PR figures to the vote (sub-vote diffs = fractional-ballot rounding)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"LDP": "LDP", "CDP": "CDP", "Ishin": "Ishin", "Komeito": "Komeito", "DPP": "DPP", "JCP": "JCP", "Reiwa": "Reiwa", "Sanseito": "Sanseito", "ConservativeParty": "ConservativeParty", "SDP": "SDP", "NHKParty": "NHKParty", "IndependentsAlliance": "IndependentsAlliance", "PathToRebirth": "PathToRebirth", "ReformParty": "ReformParty", "Seishinkai": "Seishinkai", "TeamMirai": "TeamMirai"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 47, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:44.813348", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.819, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.734, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.758, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.758, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 47}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "51939144cb8945c58947c34334fa149f", "name": "Sweden 2022 county/regional council (landstingsfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 31.7% (M 19.1, SD 14.9) \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 289, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 289, "cast_gt_registered": 289}, "n_stations_flagged": 289, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:42.755549", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.864, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.895, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.892, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.613, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.195, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.813, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.813, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.976, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.009, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.009, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 289}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "aa99f03c91a84cd1baabfd4ade995c9b", "name": "Sweden 2018 county/regional council (landstingsfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 2018, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 28.7% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 289, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 289, "registered_not_positive": 289}, "n_stations_flagged": 289, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:41.263905", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.88, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.915, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.908, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.875, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.297, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.187, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.547, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.008, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.008, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 289}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "781b700309584c7b9a3cbf6d92a14a54", "name": "Sweden 2014 county/regional council (landstingsfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 2014, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 32.9% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 289, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 289, "registered_not_positive": 289}, "n_stations_flagged": 289, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:39.601357", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.903, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.928, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.915, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.885, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.037, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.509, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.975, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 289}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a3dbdd37ce9e4dd9b36b2fcf71c23d0d", "name": "Sweden 2010 county/regional council (landstingsfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 2010, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 33.4% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 289, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 289, "registered_not_positive": 289}, "n_stations_flagged": 289, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:38.010860", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.909, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.93, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.914, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.881, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.911, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.235, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 289}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6120174a1db344e28b7dfa47adcb403e", "name": "Sweden 2006 county/regional council (landstingsfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 2006, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 34.9% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 289, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 289, "registered_not_positive": 289}, "n_stations_flagged": 289, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:36.451442", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.891, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.923, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.912, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.879, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.923, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.223, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 289}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2fb3f15a3fdb46179ed48eff85b55767", "name": "Sweden 2002 county/regional council (landstingsfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 2002, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 38.5% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 289, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 289, "cast_gt_registered": 289}, "n_stations_flagged": 289, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:35.003703", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.842, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.889, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.91, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.876, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.842, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.089, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.876, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 289}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3288febf19c24898aef3f248598d9b20", "name": "Sweden 1998 county/regional council (landstingsfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1998, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 35.8% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 288, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 288, "registered_not_positive": 288}, "n_stations_flagged": 288, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:33.165179", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.841, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.891, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.912, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.879, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.087, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.975, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 288}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "aba3c76633334034bf744f663a495469", "name": "Sweden 1994 county/regional council (landstingsfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1994, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 45.5% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 285, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 285, "cast_gt_registered": 285}, "n_stations_flagged": 285, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:31.609409", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.847, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.911, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.877, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.9, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.091, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.911, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.877, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.975, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 285}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7edc83a2871e492eb15566c381b34757", "name": "Sweden 1991 county/regional council (landstingsfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1991, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 38.3% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 283, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 283, "registered_not_positive": 283}, "n_stations_flagged": 283, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:30.073695", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.85, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.888, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.912, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.878, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.086, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.975, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 283}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "06c73806c40d43e5b3b573004fc67d76", "name": "Sweden 1988 county/regional council (landstingsfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1988, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 43.7% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 281, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 281, "cast_gt_registered": 281}, "n_stations_flagged": 281, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:28.368208", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.908, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.874, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.08, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 281}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4360f92c473a4dafb1d19ac61be21af4", "name": "Sweden 1985 county/regional council (landstingsfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1985, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 44.4% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 281, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 281, "cast_gt_registered": 281}, "n_stations_flagged": 281, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:26.968425", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.855, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.908, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.875, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.075, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.019, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 281}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "67715100f39447ab98d97115bfd94c55", "name": "Sweden 1982 county/regional council (landstingsfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1982, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 46.6% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 281, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 281, "registered_not_positive": 281}, "n_stations_flagged": 281, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:25.441700", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.852, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.887, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.873, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.078, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.019, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 281}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "19f45cfddb674b06a6c841b0e1e1dcf0", "name": "Sweden 1979 county/regional council (landstingsfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1979, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 43.9% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 276, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 276, "cast_gt_registered": 276}, "n_stations_flagged": 276, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:24.022687", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.849, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.89, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.872, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.853, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.084, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.872, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 276}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1235b71ba8d843a8b880dedf5742ab53", "name": "Sweden 1976 county/regional council (landstingsfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1976, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 43.7% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 274, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 274, "cast_gt_registered": 274}, "n_stations_flagged": 274, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:22.613555", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.845, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.879, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.906, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.871, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.879, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.859, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.082, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 274}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6faff2c8619e47fc855c57eb325c66b4", "name": "Sweden 1973 county/regional council (landstingsfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1973, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 43.8% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 275, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 275, "cast_gt_registered": 275}, "n_stations_flagged": 275, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:20.754449", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.85, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.89, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.895, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.859, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.079, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 1973, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 275}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c00f019d542e41a38621219f0b0d4f42", "name": "Sweden 2022 municipal council (kommunfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 29.3% (M 20.5, SD 14.6) \u2014 PASS, matches published ~28.6", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 290, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 290, "cast_gt_registered": 290}, "n_stations_flagged": 290, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:19.263738", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.864, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.895, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.892, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.613, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.195, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.813, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.813, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.976, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.009, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.009, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 290}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "057132c63cb94226901e50c7e310cbd4", "name": "Sweden 2018 municipal council (kommunfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 2018, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 27.6% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 290, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 290, "cast_gt_registered": 290}, "n_stations_flagged": 290, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:17.786662", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.88, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.915, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.908, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.875, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.297, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.187, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.547, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.008, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.008, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 290}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9e5614b52dc2410fb72f3bd76364ff4e", "name": "Sweden 2014 municipal council (kommunfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 2014, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 31.2% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 290, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 290, "cast_gt_registered": 290}, "n_stations_flagged": 290, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:15.212738", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.903, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.928, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.915, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.885, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.037, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.509, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.975, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 290}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "df1066c65472409092c82124a6bba14c", "name": "Sweden 2010 municipal council (kommunfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 2010, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 32.4% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 290, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 290, "cast_gt_registered": 290}, "n_stations_flagged": 290, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:13.778761", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.909, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.93, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.914, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.881, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.911, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.235, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 290}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b71d4e285bfe44408b400df705ee8ef9", "name": "Sweden 2006 municipal council (kommunfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 2006, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 34.6% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 290, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 290, "cast_gt_registered": 290}, "n_stations_flagged": 290, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:12.405258", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.891, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.923, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.912, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.879, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.923, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.223, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 290}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "91fd406421b4420e929d34facb6698a9", "name": "Sweden 2002 municipal council (kommunfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 2002, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 37.3% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 290, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 290, "registered_not_positive": 290}, "n_stations_flagged": 290, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:10.359930", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.842, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.889, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.91, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.876, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.842, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.089, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.876, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 290}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "15a552973d504c35b6a33366705b9dfd", "name": "Sweden 1998 municipal council (kommunfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1998, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 35.1% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 289, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 289, "registered_not_positive": 289}, "n_stations_flagged": 289, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:08.854505", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.841, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.891, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.912, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.879, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.087, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.975, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 289}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "711008c620164337b40f92c76d57e2b7", "name": "Sweden 1994 municipal council (kommunfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1994, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 43.4% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 288, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 288, "registered_not_positive": 288}, "n_stations_flagged": 288, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:07.087772", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.847, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.911, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.877, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.9, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.091, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.911, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.877, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.975, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 288}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "762201f1c73447ca8dd800960fdf388f", "name": "Sweden 1991 municipal council (kommunfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1991, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 36.6% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 286, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 286, "registered_not_positive": 286}, "n_stations_flagged": 286, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:05.600621", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.85, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.888, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.912, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.878, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.086, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.975, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 286}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "341d119b7b5d44238aa1bf9edcda17d6", "name": "Sweden 1988 municipal council (kommunfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1988, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 41.6% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 284, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 284, "registered_not_positive": 284}, "n_stations_flagged": 284, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:04.192077", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.908, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.874, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.08, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 284}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d806d671ecd44344b2326549136e2201", "name": "Sweden 1985 municipal council (kommunfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1985, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 42.6% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 284, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 284, "registered_not_positive": 284}, "n_stations_flagged": 284, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:01.989073", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.855, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.908, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.875, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.075, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.019, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 284}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3857d4b29982463a9c9325857a44a2f1", "name": "Sweden 1982 municipal council (kommunfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1982, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 45.5% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 284, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 284, "cast_gt_registered": 284}, "n_stations_flagged": 284, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:05:00.430161", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.852, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.887, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.873, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.078, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.019, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 284}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "198dc9fdd9fa4579a1f5d2b4b687efe2", "name": "Sweden 1979 municipal council (kommunfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1979, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 43.0% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 279, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 279, "cast_gt_registered": 279}, "n_stations_flagged": 279, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:04:58.911511", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.849, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.89, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.872, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.853, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.084, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.872, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 279}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bf06c6ad667f4778b023e5fc1485712a", "name": "Sweden 1976 municipal council (kommunfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1976, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 43.0% \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 277, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 277, "cast_gt_registered": 277}, "n_stations_flagged": 277, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:04:56.449301", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.845, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.879, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.906, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.871, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.879, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.859, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.082, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 277}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2b70481735c14bb88c98ebb1dfb302d6", "name": "Sweden 1973 municipal council (kommunfullm\u00e4ktige) per-kommun", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1973, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "S largest 43.2% (Social Democrats) \u2014 PASS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "L": "L", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 278, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 278, "registered_not_positive": 278}, "n_stations_flagged": 278, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:04:55.038544", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.85, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.89, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.895, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.859, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.079, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 1973, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 278}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8bb2589c1e4a4ecea309e55839ba53a5", "name": "Poland 2010 presidential R2 (per-obwod)", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 2010, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "KOMOROWSKI 53.0106% (8,933,887) vs KACZYNSKI 46.9894% (7,919,134); turnout 55.30% \u2014 matches known 53.01/46.99, turnout 55.3% EXACTLY; winner Komorowski correct", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"KACZYNSKI": "KACZYNSKI", "KOMOROWSKI": "KOMOROWSKI"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 25773, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:03:51.365374", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.92, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.939, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.892, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.827, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.685, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.402, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.601, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.795, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.086, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.086, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.971, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Civic Platform", "winner_candidate": "B. Komorowski", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Law and Justice (PIS)", "margin": 6.02, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "POL", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 25773}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4306c395f3754ca780cd73be5dcc6f02", "name": "Ghana 2024 Parliamentary (per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Ghana", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "FULL per-candidate dataset (NOT winner-only). Seat tally (count of constituencies won) = NDC 184 / NPP 88 / Independent 4 \u2014 EXACT match to known result. National vote totals EXACT (diff=0): NDC 6,258,144 (52.95%), NPP 5,257,506 (44.48%), Independents 269,465 (2.28%), and every minor party matches the Wikipedia summary table exactly.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"NDC": "NDC", "NPP": "NPP", "APC": "APC", "CPP": "CPP", "GCPP": "GCPP", "GFP": "GFP", "GUM": "GUM", "Independent": "Independent", "LPG": "LPG", "NDP": "NDP", "PAG": "PAG", "PNC": "PNC", "PPP": "PPP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 276, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 276, "cast_gt_registered": 276}, "n_stations_flagged": 276, "created_at": "2026-06-18T22:01:48.162573", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.177, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.665, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.56, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.177, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.437, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.66, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.139, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.276, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.344, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.586, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.56, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.638, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 276}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f4739a76555e45d8a7df8debbf6c2042", "name": "United States 2016 \u2014 County Presidential", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2016, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "County-level certified presidential returns, MEDSL (MIT Election Data & Science Lab), CC0, via MEDSL/county-returns GitHub mirror (ungated). 3,154 counties. Winner: Clinton (D) popular-vote win; Trump won EC. Reconciles to certified national totals (Dem/Rep within ~0.2%). Third parties mostly folded to Other in this file; 2000 breaks out Green/Nader. registered not published at county level.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Democratic": "Democratic", "Republican": "Republican", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3154, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 3154, "cast_valid_mismatch": 9, "registered_not_positive": 3154}, "n_stations_flagged": 3154, "created_at": "2026-06-18T21:02:22.236194", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.259, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.885, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.83, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.259, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.594, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.554, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.495, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.068, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.068, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 14.13, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3154}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "97044c8b4f0840aead39340a18c0d430", "name": "United States 2012 \u2014 County Presidential", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2012, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "County-level certified presidential returns, MEDSL (MIT Election Data & Science Lab), CC0, via MEDSL/county-returns GitHub mirror (ungated). 3,154 counties. Winner: Obama (D). Reconciles to certified national totals (Dem/Rep within ~0.2%). Third parties mostly folded to Other in this file; 2000 breaks out Green/Nader. registered not published at county level.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Democratic": "Democratic", "Republican": "Republican", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3154, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 3154, "cast_valid_mismatch": 10, "cast_gt_registered": 3154}, "n_stations_flagged": 3154, "created_at": "2026-06-18T21:02:13.271341", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.78, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.889, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.842, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.984, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.996, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.734, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.715, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.22, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.053, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.053, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Republican", "margin": 23.42, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3154}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8cd636c72d8946cd8ac1e2d900df7725", "name": "United States 2008 \u2014 County Presidential", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2008, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "County-level certified presidential returns, MEDSL (MIT Election Data & Science Lab), CC0, via MEDSL/county-returns GitHub mirror (ungated). 3,154 counties. Winner: Obama (D). Reconciles to certified national totals (Dem/Rep within ~0.2%). Third parties mostly folded to Other in this file; 2000 breaks out Green/Nader. registered not published at county level.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Democratic": "Democratic", "Republican": "Republican", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3154, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 3154, "cast_valid_mismatch": 10, "registered_not_positive": 3154}, "n_stations_flagged": 3154, "created_at": "2026-06-18T21:02:03.739925", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.776, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.88, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.9, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.845, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.776, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.983, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.996, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.715, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.579, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Republican", "margin": 35.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3154}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a67d7c3905284947ad0430f218e939f5", "name": "United States 2004 \u2014 County Presidential", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2004, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "County-level certified presidential returns, MEDSL (MIT Election Data & Science Lab), CC0, via MEDSL/county-returns GitHub mirror (ungated). 3,154 counties. Winner: Bush (R). Reconciles to certified national totals (Dem/Rep within ~0.2%). Third parties mostly folded to Other in this file; 2000 breaks out Green/Nader. registered not published at county level.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Democratic": "Democratic", "Republican": "Republican", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3154, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 3154, "cast_valid_mismatch": 10, "cast_gt_registered": 3154}, "n_stations_flagged": 3154, "created_at": "2026-06-18T21:01:54.587591", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.384, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.862, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.799, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.384, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.041, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Republican", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Democratic", "margin": 6.51, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3154}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "78a55f3107734dbf8be440750f31fffc", "name": "United States 2000 \u2014 County Presidential", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2000, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "County-level certified presidential returns, MEDSL (MIT Election Data & Science Lab), CC0, via MEDSL/county-returns GitHub mirror (ungated). 3,153 counties. Winner: Gore (D) popular-vote win; Bush won EC. Reconciles to certified national totals (Dem/Rep within ~0.2%). Third parties mostly folded to Other in this file; 2000 breaks out Green/Nader. registered not published at county level.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Democratic": "Democratic", "Republican": "Republican", "Green": "Green", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3153, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 10, "registered_not_positive": 3153, "cast_gt_registered": 3152}, "n_stations_flagged": 3153, "created_at": "2026-06-18T21:01:45.948191", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.855, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.489, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.867, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.808, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.489, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.823, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.748, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.691, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Republican", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Democratic", "margin": 0.93, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 2000, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3153}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "15e3889bdd194a508ee0aa424db1cf84", "name": "Ghana 2024 \u2014 Presidential (per-region, coarse)", "metadata": {"country": "Ghana", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Wikipedia regional presidential table (16 regions; EC constituency level is 403-gated). Mahama (NDC) 56.6% def. Bawumia (NPP) 41.6%. Reconciles exactly to certified EC totals. NEW country. COARSE \u2014 only 16 units, so per-station forensic tests (Benford, Moran, KHT) are low-power; included for map + winner coverage.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_mahama_ndc": "Mahama Ndc", "votes_bawumia_npp": "Bawumia Npp", "votes_bediako_ind": "Bediako Ind", "votes_kyerematen_ind": "Kyerematen Ind", "votes_frimpomaa_cpp": "Frimpomaa Cpp", "votes_ayariga_apc": "Ayariga Apc", "votes_lartey_gcpp": "Lartey Gcpp", "votes_andrews_gum": "Andrews Gum", "votes_akpaloo_lpg": "Akpaloo Lpg", "votes_frimpong_ndp": "Frimpong Ndp", "votes_koranteng_ind": "Koranteng Ind", "votes_tbadu_ind": "Tbadu Ind"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 16, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 16, "cast_gt_registered": 16}, "n_stations_flagged": 16, "created_at": "2026-06-17T19:46:04.195479", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.177, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.665, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.56, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.177, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.437, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.66, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.139, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.276, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.344, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.586, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.56, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.638, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 16}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ff2a153ef35f4c2aafcb1d56140b84ef", "name": "Sweden 1994 \u2014 Riksdag (per-municipality)", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1994, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "SCB PxWeb (ME0104T3) per-kommun party votes (closed-list PR), Riksdag 1994. Social Democrats (S) largest party. Historical fill \u2014 corpus had 2010-2022. valdistrikt (polling-district) level is gated; municipality is the open level. registered not published at this level (synthesised); \u03a3party==valid exactly.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "FP": "FP", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 288, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 288, "registered_not_positive": 288}, "n_stations_flagged": 288, "created_at": "2026-06-17T19:46:02.655644", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.847, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.911, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.877, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.9, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.091, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.911, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.877, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.975, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 288}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c8636295841c49b1b7541ff7566ecb02", "name": "Sweden 1991 \u2014 Riksdag (per-municipality)", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1991, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "SCB PxWeb (ME0104T3) per-kommun party votes (closed-list PR), Riksdag 1991. Social Democrats (S) largest party. Historical fill \u2014 corpus had 2010-2022. valdistrikt (polling-district) level is gated; municipality is the open level. registered not published at this level (synthesised); \u03a3party==valid exactly.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "FP": "FP", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 286, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 286, "registered_not_positive": 286}, "n_stations_flagged": 286, "created_at": "2026-06-17T19:46:00.898263", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.85, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.888, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.912, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.878, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.086, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.975, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 286}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a87fd118a92a4bbe861696876d36e7a8", "name": "Sweden 1988 \u2014 Riksdag (per-municipality)", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1988, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "SCB PxWeb (ME0104T3) per-kommun party votes (closed-list PR), Riksdag 1988. Social Democrats (S) largest party. Historical fill \u2014 corpus had 2010-2022. valdistrikt (polling-district) level is gated; municipality is the open level. registered not published at this level (synthesised); \u03a3party==valid exactly.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "FP": "FP", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 284, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 284, "cast_gt_registered": 284}, "n_stations_flagged": 284, "created_at": "2026-06-17T19:45:59.246579", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.908, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.874, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.08, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 284}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7e613ec88a3740a4b3cd6bfe0920a854", "name": "Sweden 1985 \u2014 Riksdag (per-municipality)", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1985, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "SCB PxWeb (ME0104T3) per-kommun party votes (closed-list PR), Riksdag 1985. Social Democrats (S) largest party. Historical fill \u2014 corpus had 2010-2022. valdistrikt (polling-district) level is gated; municipality is the open level. registered not published at this level (synthesised); \u03a3party==valid exactly.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "FP": "FP", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 284, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 284, "registered_not_positive": 284}, "n_stations_flagged": 284, "created_at": "2026-06-17T19:45:57.634707", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.855, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.908, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.875, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.075, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.019, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 284}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3ad35af4e3a34b82bc27daf3d6468958", "name": "Sweden 1982 \u2014 Riksdag (per-municipality)", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1982, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "SCB PxWeb (ME0104T3) per-kommun party votes (closed-list PR), Riksdag 1982. Social Democrats (S) largest party. Historical fill \u2014 corpus had 2010-2022. valdistrikt (polling-district) level is gated; municipality is the open level. registered not published at this level (synthesised); \u03a3party==valid exactly.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "FP": "FP", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 284, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 284, "cast_gt_registered": 284}, "n_stations_flagged": 284, "created_at": "2026-06-17T19:45:55.946465", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.852, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.887, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.873, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.078, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.019, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 284}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f8efbff2ada94bed8d1ac33d7f6c0c22", "name": "Sweden 1979 \u2014 Riksdag (per-municipality)", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1979, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "SCB PxWeb (ME0104T3) per-kommun party votes (closed-list PR), Riksdag 1979. Social Democrats (S) largest party. Historical fill \u2014 corpus had 2010-2022. valdistrikt (polling-district) level is gated; municipality is the open level. registered not published at this level (synthesised); \u03a3party==valid exactly.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "FP": "FP", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 279, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 279, "cast_gt_registered": 279}, "n_stations_flagged": 279, "created_at": "2026-06-17T19:45:54.338300", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.849, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.89, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.872, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.853, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.084, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.872, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 279}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ca3495d2feb740a99f48ae50ed6418da", "name": "Sweden 1976 \u2014 Riksdag (per-municipality)", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1976, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "SCB PxWeb (ME0104T3) per-kommun party votes (closed-list PR), Riksdag 1976. Social Democrats (S) largest party. Historical fill \u2014 corpus had 2010-2022. valdistrikt (polling-district) level is gated; municipality is the open level. registered not published at this level (synthesised); \u03a3party==valid exactly.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "FP": "FP", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 277, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 277, "cast_gt_registered": 277}, "n_stations_flagged": 277, "created_at": "2026-06-17T19:45:52.785245", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.845, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.879, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.906, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.871, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.879, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.859, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.082, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 277}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6cdf4824a39d428c86700df2e0cb4d6c", "name": "Sweden 1973 \u2014 Riksdag (per-municipality)", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 1973, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "SCB PxWeb (ME0104T3) per-kommun party votes (closed-list PR), Riksdag 1973. Social Democrats (S) largest party. Historical fill \u2014 corpus had 2010-2022. valdistrikt (polling-district) level is gated; municipality is the open level. registered not published at this level (synthesised); \u03a3party==valid exactly.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"M": "M", "C": "C", "FP": "FP", "KD": "KD", "MP": "MP", "S": "S", "V": "V", "SD": "SD", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 278, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 278, "cast_gt_registered": 278}, "n_stations_flagged": 278, "created_at": "2026-06-17T19:45:51.243340", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.85, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.89, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.895, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.859, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.079, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 1973, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 278}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "77b662b859b34c57af9016d8f53168d7", "name": "Poland 2010 \u2014 Presidential R1 (per-obw\u00f3d)", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 2010, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "PKW per-obw\u00f3d, 20 Jun 2010 Round 1 (post-Smolensk snap). 25,774 polling stations \u00d7 10 candidates. Komorowski 41.5% > Kaczy\u0144ski 36.5% > Napieralski 13.7%; turnout 54.9%. \u03a3cand==valid exactly; invalid computed cast\u2212valid (PKW omitted the invalid column). NEW cycle \u2014 corpus had Sejm 2019/2023 + 2025 presidential.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"JUREK": "JUREK", "KACZYNSKI": "KACZYNSKI", "KOMOROWSKI": "KOMOROWSKI", "KORWIN_MIKKE": "KORWIN_MIKKE", "LEPPER": "LEPPER", "MORAWIECKI": "MORAWIECKI", "NAPIERALSKI": "NAPIERALSKI", "OLECHOWSKI": "OLECHOWSKI", "PAWLAK": "PAWLAK", "ZIETEK": "ZIETEK"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 25774, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-17T19:44:43.399451", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.92, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.939, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.892, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.827, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.685, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.402, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.601, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.795, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.086, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.086, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.971, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Civic Platform", "winner_candidate": "B. Komorowski", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Law and Justice (PIS)", "margin": 6.02, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "POL", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 25774}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "729037f40d3445d1bed8af5b18032da8", "name": "Zimbabwe 2023 \u2014 Presidential (per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Zimbabwe", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "ZEC official collation (WPDM Excel), 23 Aug 2023 harmonised election. 210 constituencies \u00d7 11 candidates. Mnangagwa (ZANU-PF) 52.6% def. Chamisa (CCC) 44.0%; turnout 68.9%. Reconciles EXACTLY to ZEC national grand totals. NEW country. ZEC did not publish V11 polling-station forms \u2014 constituency is the finest open granularity.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Busha_FreeZim": "Busha_FreeZim", "Chamisa_CCC": "Chamisa_CCC", "Chikohora_ZCPD": "Chikohora_ZCPD", "Kasiyamhuru_ZIPP": "Kasiyamhuru_ZIPP", "Madhuku_NCA": "Madhuku_NCA", "Mnangagwa_ZANU_PF": "Mnangagwa_ZANU_PF", "Mubaiwa_NPC": "Mubaiwa_NPC", "Muzorewa_UANC": "Muzorewa_UANC", "Mwonzora_MDC_T": "Mwonzora_MDC_T", "Valerio_UZA": "Valerio_UZA", "Wilson_DOP": "Wilson_DOP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 210, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-17T19:44:36.124762", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.368, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.067, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.296, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.175, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.368, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.342, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.067, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.499, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.392, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.098, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.678, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.17, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.296, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.296, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.175, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.175, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.149, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.149, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.41, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.495, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.495, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 210}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9b17125b6a7c4a8386b195514456874d", "name": "Germany 2025 \u2014 Bundestag (per-Wahlkreis)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Bundeswahlleiterin official FINAL Zweitstimme (party second vote) per Wahlkreis, 23 Feb 2025 snap election. 299 constituencies. CDU/CSU 28.5% (Merz) > AfD 20.8% > SPD 16.4% > Gr\u00fcne 11.6% > Linke 8.8%; BSW 4.97% & FDP 4.3% missed 5%. cast=valid+invalid, \u03a3party=valid (both exact). NEW cycle \u2014 corpus previously had only BTW2021.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"CDU": "CDU", "CSU": "CSU", "SPD": "SPD", "GRUENE": "GRUENE", "AfD": "AfD", "DIE_LINKE": "DIE_LINKE", "BSW": "BSW", "FDP": "FDP", "FREIE_WAEHLER": "FREIE_WAEHLER", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 299, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-17T19:44:34.637502", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.846, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.462, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.828, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.782, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.462, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.746, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.233, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.558, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 299}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "743115f7a31c458b9691460b0dffd83e", "name": "United States 2024 \u2014 County Presidential", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "County-level certified presidential returns (tonmcg mirror of AP / state canvasses). 3,160 counties \u00d7 Dem/Rep/Other. cast=valid=total ballots; registered not published at county level. Winner: Trump (R). 2020 & 2024 reconcile exactly to national totals; 2016 ~5% undercounted in this older mirror.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Democratic": "Democratic", "Republican": "Republican", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3160, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 3160, "registered_not_positive": 3160}, "n_stations_flagged": 3160, "created_at": "2026-06-17T19:19:01.440368", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3160}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3589371f54fb4891b7aaf91a5e11a7ec", "name": "United States 2020 \u2014 County Presidential", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2020, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "County-level certified presidential returns (tonmcg mirror of AP / state canvasses). 3,152 counties \u00d7 Dem/Rep/Other. cast=valid=total ballots; registered not published at county level. Winner: Biden (D). 2020 & 2024 reconcile exactly to national totals; 2016 ~5% undercounted in this older mirror.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Democratic": "Democratic", "Republican": "Republican", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3152, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 3152, "registered_not_positive": 3152}, "n_stations_flagged": 3152, "created_at": "2026-06-17T19:18:51.845095", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.754, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.681, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.815, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.734, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.681, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.473, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.429, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.917, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.928, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.085, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.085, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.901, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3152}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "131a921a36ff43a0955c27e95f5d1598", "name": "Zimbabwe 2018 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 208)", "metadata": {"country": "Zimbabwe", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Zimbabwe lower-house election 2018, CONSTITUENCY level (208 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_1980_freedom_movement_zimbabwe": "#1980 Freedom Movement Zimbabwe", "votes_alliance_for_national_salvation": "Alliance for National Salvation", "votes_alliance_for_the_people_s_agenda": "Alliance for the People's Agenda", "votes_build_zimbabwe_alliance": "Build Zimbabwe Alliance", "votes_coalition_of_democrats": "Coalition of Democrats", "votes_freezim_congress": "FreeZim Congress", "votes_freedom_justice_coalition_zimbabwe": "Freedom Justice Coalition Zimbabwe", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_movement_for_democratic_change_allia": "Movement for Democratic Change Alliance", "votes_movement_for_democratic_change_tsvan": "Movement for Democratic Change \u2013 Tsvangirai", "votes_mtwakazi_republic_party": "Mtwakazi Republic Party", "votes_ndf": "NDF", "votes_national_constitutional_assembly": "National Constitutional Assembly", "votes_national_patriotic_front": "National Patriotic Front", "votes_prz": "PRZ", "votes_people_s_progressive_party_zimbabwe": "People's Progressive Party Zimbabwe", "votes_people_s_rainbow_coalition": "People's Rainbow Coalition", "votes_republican_party_of_zimbabwe": "Republican Party of Zimbabwe", "votes_the_african_democrats": "The African Democrats", "votes_united_african_national_council": "United African National Council", "votes_united_democratic_alliance": "United Democratic Alliance", "votes_united_democratic_front": "United Democratic Front", "votes_united_movement_for_devolution": "United Movement for Devolution", "votes_zimbabwe_african_national_union_patr": "Zimbabwe African National Union Patriotic Front", "votes_zimbabwe_african_people_s_union": "Zimbabwe African People's Union", "votes_zimbabwe_democratic_union": "Zimbabwe Democratic Union", "votes_zimbabwe_labour_party": "Zimbabwe Labour Party", "votes_zimbabwe_partnership_for_prosperity": "Zimbabwe Partnership for Prosperity", "votes_zimbabwe_patriotic_movement": "Zimbabwe Patriotic Movement", "votes_zimbabwe_rainbow_democratic_party": "Zimbabwe Rainbow Democratic Party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 208, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 208, "registered_not_positive": 208}, "n_stations_flagged": 208, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:33:05.733799", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.422, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.651, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.313, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.216, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.422, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.355, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.651, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.016, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.504, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.997, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.563, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.213, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.044, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.261, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.313, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.313, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.216, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.216, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.185, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.185, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.428, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.428, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.38, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.38, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.771, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.532, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.532, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 208}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c5f2f168442b427f85e73970e358d672", "name": "Zimbabwe 2013 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 209)", "metadata": {"country": "Zimbabwe", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Zimbabwe lower-house election 2013, CONSTITUENCY level (209 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_khumbul_ekhaya": "Alliance Khumbul' Ekhaya", "votes_ctd_party": "CTD Party", "votes_freedom_front_candidate": "Freedom Front Candidate", "votes_freezim_congress": "Freezim Congress", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_mavambo_kusile_dawn": "Mavambo/Kusile/Dawn", "votes_movement_for_democratic_change": "Movement for Democratic Change", "votes_movement_for_democratic_change_i": "Movement for Democratic Change-I", "votes_movement_for_democratic_change_tsvan": "Movement for Democratic Change-Tsvangirai", "votes_multi_racial_christian_democrats": "Multi-Racial Christian Democrats", "votes_people_s_democratic_union": "People's Democratic Union", "votes_progressive_and_innovative_movement_": "Progressive and Innovative Movement of Zimbabwe", "votes_united_movement_for_democracy_party": "United Movement for Democracy Party", "votes_vox_populi": "Vox Populi", "votes_zimbabwe_african_national_union_ndon": "Zimbabwe African National Union-Ndonga", "votes_zimbabwe_african_national_union_patr": "Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front", "votes_zimbabwe_african_people_s_union": "Zimbabwe African People's Union", "votes_zimbabwe_development_party": "Zimbabwe Development Party", "votes_zimbabwe_people_s_movement": "Zimbabwe People's Movement"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 209, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 209, "cast_gt_registered": 209}, "n_stations_flagged": 209, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:33:01.655223", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.869, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.417, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.289, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.209, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.869, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.417, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.354, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.225, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.556, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.785, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.196, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.234, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.458, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.364, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.905, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.226, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.289, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.209, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.209, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.19, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.19, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.457, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.744, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.458, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.458, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "ZANU-PF", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "MDC-Tsvangirai", "margin": 27.79, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ZWE", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 209}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6caf4abc9e034a6b9cdccde148d81778", "name": "Zimbabwe 2008 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 210)", "metadata": {"country": "Zimbabwe", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Zimbabwe lower-house election 2008, CONSTITUENCY level (210 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_christian_democratic_party": "Christian Democratic Party", "votes_federal_democratic_union": "Federal Democratic Union", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_movement_for_democratic_change": "Movement for Democratic Change", "votes_movement_for_democratic_change_tsvan": "Movement for Democratic Change-Tsvangirai", "votes_patriotic_union_of_matabeleland": "Patriotic Union of Matabeleland", "votes_peace_action_is_freedom_for_all": "Peace Action is Freedom for All", "votes_united_people_s_party": "United People's Party", "votes_vox_populi": "Vox Populi", "votes_zdb_party": "ZDB Party", "votes_zurd_party": "ZURD Party", "votes_zimbabwe_african_national_union": "Zimbabwe African National Union", "votes_zimbabwe_african_national_union_ndon": "Zimbabwe African National Union-Ndonga", "votes_zimbabwe_african_national_union_patr": "Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front", "votes_zimbabwe_african_people_s_union_fede": "Zimbabwe African People's Union-Federal Party", "votes_zimbabwe_development_party": "Zimbabwe Development Party", "votes_zimbabwe_people_s_progress_democrati": "Zimbabwe People's Progress Democratic Party", "votes_zimbabwe_youth_in_alliance": "Zimbabwe Youth in Alliance"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 210, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:32:57.193244", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.404, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 0.687, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.251, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.149, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.101, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 0.687, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.172, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.433, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.358, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.317, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.079, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.097, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.242, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.197, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.251, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.251, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.149, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.149, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.164, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.164, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.372, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.314, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.314, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.315, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.315, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "ZANU-PF", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "MDC-Tsvangirai", "margin": 80.45, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ZWE", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 210}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a1f3e709e376428bbda6719bee007559", "name": "Zimbabwe 2005 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 120)", "metadata": {"country": "Zimbabwe", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Zimbabwe lower-house election 2005, CONSTITUENCY level (120 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_movement_for_democratic_change": "Movement for Democratic Change", "votes_zimbabwe_african_national_union_ndon": "Zimbabwe African National Union-Ndonga", "votes_zimbabwe_african_national_union_patr": "Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front", "votes_zimbabwe_people_s_progress_democrati": "Zimbabwe People's Progress Democratic Party", "votes_zimbabwe_youth_in_alliance": "Zimbabwe Youth in Alliance"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 120, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 120, "cast_gt_registered": 120}, "n_stations_flagged": 120, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:32:53.778990", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.26, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.258, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.153, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.209, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.26, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.315, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.34, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.676, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.169, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.247, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.062, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.202, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.195, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.258, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.258, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.153, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.153, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.167, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.167, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.391, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.391, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.314, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.314, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.325, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.325, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 120}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "45c11c8b8d6e4aa59bff6e14355c78b3", "name": "Zambia 2021 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 156)", "metadata": {"country": "Zambia", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Zambia lower-house election 2021, CONSTITUENCY level (156 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_christian_democratic_party": "Christian Democratic Party", "votes_democratic_party": "Democratic Party", "votes_economic_freedom_fighters": "Economic Freedom Fighters", "votes_forum_for_democracy_and_development": "Forum for Democracy and Development", "votes_golden_party_zambia": "Golden Party Zambia", "votes_green_party_of_zambia": "Green Party of Zambia", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_leadership_movement": "Leadership Movement", "votes_movement_for_democratic_change": "Movement for Democratic Change", "votes_movement_for_multi_party_democracy": "Movement for Multi-Party Democracy", "votes_national_democratic_congress": "National Democratic Congress", "votes_national_restoration_party": "National Restoration Party", "votes_new_heritage_party": "New Heritage Party", "votes_party_of_national_unity_and_progress": "Party of National Unity and Progress", "votes_patriotic_front": "Patriotic Front", "votes_patriots_for_economic_progress": "Patriots for Economic Progress", "votes_people_s_alliance_for_change": "People's Alliance for Change", "votes_socialist_party": "Socialist Party", "votes_united_national_independence_party": "United National Independence Party", "votes_united_party_for_national_developmen": "United Party for National Development", "votes_united_prosperous_and_peaceful_zambi": "United Prosperous and Peaceful Zambia", "votes_zambians_united_for_sustainable_deve": "Zambians United for Sustainable Development"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 156, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:32:51.153725", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.663, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.428, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.421, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.339, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.879, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.47, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.154, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.61, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.421, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.339, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.339, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.274, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.274, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.676, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 156}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "75a5f241b95e4607853d731fa7c8f9f4", "name": "Zambia 2016 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 156)", "metadata": {"country": "Zambia", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Zambia lower-house election 2016, CONSTITUENCY level (156 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_for_democracy_and_developme": "Alliance for Democracy and Development", "votes_forum_for_democracy_and_development": "Forum for Democracy and Development", "votes_golden_progressive_party": "Golden Progressive Party", "votes_green_party_of_zambia": "Green Party of Zambia", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_movement_for_multi_party_democracy": "Movement for Multi-Party Democracy", "votes_national_restoration_party": "National Restoration Party", "votes_patriotic_front": "Patriotic Front", "votes_radical_revolutionary_party": "Radical Revolutionary Party", "votes_rainbow_party": "Rainbow Party", "votes_united_democratic_front": "United Democratic Front", "votes_united_national_independence_party": "United National Independence Party", "votes_united_party_for_national_developmen": "United Party for National Development", "votes_united_progressive_people": "United Progressive People"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 156, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:32:47.270400", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.673, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.811, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.397, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.328, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.418, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.453, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.292, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.323, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.486, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.605, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.401, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.257, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.314, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.397, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.397, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.328, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.255, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.255, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.709, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.319, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.319, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Patriotic Front (PF)", "winner_candidate": "Edgar Lungu", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "United Party for National Development (UPND)", "margin": 2.72, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ZMB", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 156}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9e11247bc1c44662a9eff942841314cb", "name": "Zambia 2011 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 150)", "metadata": {"country": "Zambia", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Zambia lower-house election 2011, CONSTITUENCY level (150 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_people_s_congress_party": "All People's Congress Party", "votes_alliance_for_democracy_and_developme": "Alliance for Democracy and Development", "votes_citizens_democratic_party": "Citizens Democratic Party", "votes_federal_democratic_party": "Federal Democratic Party", "votes_forum_for_democracy_and_development": "Forum for Democracy and Development", "votes_heritage_party": "Heritage Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_movement_for_multi_party_democracy": "Movement for Multi-Party Democracy", "votes_national_movement_for_progress": "National Movement for Progress", "votes_national_party": "National Party", "votes_national_resoration_party": "National Resoration Party", "votes_national_revolution_party": "National Revolution Party", "votes_new_generation_party": "New Generation Party", "votes_patriotic_front": "Patriotic Front", "votes_unified_party_for_democracy_and_deve": "Unified Party for Democracy and Development", "votes_united_liberal_party": "United Liberal Party", "votes_united_national_independence_party": "United National Independence Party", "votes_united_party_for_national_developmen": "United Party for National Development", "votes_zambia_direct_democracy_movement": "Zambia Direct Democracy Movement", "votes_zambian_conservative_party": "Zambian Conservative Party", "votes_zambians_for_empowerment_and_develop": "Zambians for Empowerment and Development"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 150, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:32:43.951148", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.567, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.157, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.503, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.42, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.567, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.642, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.157, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.561, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.64, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.905, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.476, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.599, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.354, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.503, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.42, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.42, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.323, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.323, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.308, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.308, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "PF", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "MMD", "margin": 6.87, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ZMB", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 150}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2f2a68e7554d4a16a85c457662b5d55e", "name": "Venezuela 2015 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 114)", "metadata": {"country": "Venezuela", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Venezuela lower-house election 2015, CONSTITUENCY level (114 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_asociaci_n_civil_catedra_guaicaipuro": "Asociaci\u00f3n Civil Catedra Guaicaipuro", "votes_asociaci_n_civil_indigena_warao_mara": "Asociaci\u00f3n Civil Indigena Warao Maraisa Kojotuka", "votes_bandera_roja": "Bandera Roja", "votes_consejo_nacional_indio_de_venezuela": "Consejo Nacional Indio De Venezuela", "votes_fundaci_n_cultural_y_social_wayu_gua": "Fundaci\u00f3n Cultural y Social Wayu Guajira Venezolana", "votes_fundaci_n_para_la_capacitaci_n_integ": "Fundaci\u00f3n Para La Capacitaci\u00f3n Integraci\u00f3n y Dignificaci\u00f3n Del Indige", "votes_independientes_por_la_comunidad_naci": "Independientes Por La Comunidad Nacional", "votes_mesa_de_la_unidad_democratica": "Mesa De La Unidad Democratica", "votes_movimiento_al_socialismo": "Movimiento Al Socialismo", "votes_movimiento_de_integridad_nacional": "Movimiento De Integridad Nacional", "votes_movimiento_de_los_pueblos_indigenas_": "Movimiento De Los Pueblos Indigenas De Venezuela", "votes_movimiento_electoral_del_pueblo": "Movimiento Electoral Del Pueblo", "votes_movimiento_indigena_autonomo_de_vene": "Movimiento Indigena Autonomo De Venezuela", "votes_movimiento_indigena_autonomo_del_est": "Movimiento Indigena Autonomo Del Estado Zulia", "votes_nueva_vision_para_mi_pais": "Nueva Vision Para Mi Pais", "votes_nuevo_camino_revolucionario": "Nuevo Camino Revolucionario", "votes_organizaci_n_indigena_kalaira": "Organizaci\u00f3n Indigena Kalaira", "votes_organizaci_n_indigena_tawala": "Organizaci\u00f3n Indigena Tawala", "votes_organizaci_n_socialista_indigena_bol": "Organizaci\u00f3n Socialista Indigena Bolivariana Unida", "votes_parlamento_indigena_de_venezuela": "Parlamento Indigena De Venezuela", "votes_partido_comunista_de_venezuela": "Partido Comunista de Venezuela", "votes_partido_independiente_del_zulia": "Partido Independiente Del Zulia", "votes_partido_socialista_unido_de_venezuel": "Partido Socialista Unido De Venezuela", "votes_patria_para_todos": "Patria Para Todos", "votes_por_la_democracia_social": "Por La Democracia Social", "votes_redes_de_repuestas_de_cambios_comuni": "Redes De Repuestas de Cambios Comunitarios", "votes_solidaridad_independiente": "Solidaridad Independiente", "votes_tendencias_unificadas_para_alcanzar_": "Tendencias Unificadas Para Alcanzar el Mov. Accion Rev. Organizada", "votes_unidad_democratica_renovadora": "Unidad Democratica Renovadora", "votes_unidad_popular_venezolana": "Unidad Popular Venezolana", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 114, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 21, "cast_valid_mismatch": 30}, "n_stations_flagged": 30, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:32:41.330541", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.37, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.093, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.3, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.103, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.37, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.593, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.093, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.773, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.69, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.308, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.651, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.163, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.145, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.12, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.28, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.3, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.3, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.103, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.103, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.21, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.21, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.521, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.354, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.354, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 114}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ca05c1cf085e49afaece123f1b41fe89", "name": "Venezuela 2010 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 114)", "metadata": {"country": "Venezuela", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Venezuela lower-house election 2010, CONSTITUENCY level (114 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alianza_fg_usp_piedra": "Alianza FG, USP, PIEDRA", "votes_alianza_mabs_upem_nos_ml_poder_labor": "Alianza MABS, UPEM, NOS, ML, PODER LABORAL, MOVEV, FL, USP", "votes_alianza_mcp_active_juan_bimba_poder_": "Alianza MCP, ACTIVE, JUAN BIMBA, PODER LABORAL, NOS, SOLIDARIDAD", "votes_alianza_movev_conde_psoev": "Alianza MOVEV, CONDE, PSOEV", "votes_alianza_movev_solidaridad": "Alianza MOVEV, SOLIDARIDAD", "votes_alianza_opina_juan_bimba": "Alianza OPINA, JUAN BIMBA", "votes_alianza_opina_unidos_cheo_ml_redes_e": "Alianza OPINA, UNIDOS, CHEO, ML, REDES, EL, JUAN BIMBA, PIEDRA", "votes_alianza_poder_laboral_vov": "Alianza PODER LABORAL, VOV", "votes_alianza_ppt_mcp_nos": "Alianza PPT, MCP, NOS", "votes_alianza_ppt_mppc_aali": "Alianza PPT, MPPC, AALI", "votes_alianza_ppt_rena_usi": "Alianza PPT, RENA, USI", "votes_alianza_ppt_udh": "Alianza PPT, UDH", "votes_alianza_ppt_unidos_psoev": "Alianza PPT, UNIDOS, PSOEV", "votes_alianza_redes_vdp_mcp_dr_active_dp_j": "Alianza REDES, VDP, MCP, DR, ACTIVE, DP, JUAN BIMBA", "votes_alianza_tupamaro_unidos": "Alianza TUPAMARO, UNIDOS", "votes_alianza_unidos_juan_bimba": "Alianza UNIDOS, JUAN BIMBA", "votes_independientes_por_la_comunidad_naci": "Independientes Por La Comunidad Nacional", "votes_mesa_de_la_unidad_democr_tica": "Mesa de la Unidad Democr\u00e1tica", "votes_movimiento_basti_n_revolucionario_20": "Movimiento Basti\u00f3n Revolucionario 200 4-Fases", "votes_movimiento_ecol_gico_de_venezuela": "Movimiento Ecol\u00f3gico de Venezuela", "votes_movimiento_electoral_del_pueblo": "Movimiento Electoral del Pueblo", "votes_movimiento_nacional_la_base_decide": "Movimiento Nacional La Base Decide", "votes_nuevo_orden_social": "Nuevo Orden Social", "votes_nuevo_pacto": "Nuevo Pacto", "votes_opini_n_nacional": "Opini\u00f3n Nacional", "votes_partido_pol_tico_actividad_vecinal": "Partido Pol\u00edtico Actividad Vecinal", "votes_partido_socialista_organizado_en_ven": "Partido Socialista Organizado en Venezuela", "votes_partido_socialista_unido_de_venezuel": "Partido Socialista Unido de Venezuela", "votes_patria_para_todos": "Patria Para Todos", "votes_tendencias_unificadas_para_alcanzar_": "Tendencias Unificadas Para Alcanzar El Movimiento de Acci\u00f3n Revuelta Organizada", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 114, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 87, "registered_not_positive": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 90, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:32:37.750523", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.579, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.047, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.419, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.154, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.579, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.047, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.192, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.441, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.278, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.32, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.204, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.301, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.419, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.419, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.154, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.154, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.286, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.286, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.046, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.046, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.58, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.58, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 114}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5fc21ce1882a4e7a96466ece84dca57c", "name": "United States 2024 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 2024, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_others": "All Others", "votes_approval_voting_party": "Approval Voting Party", "votes_blank": "Blank", "votes_blank_votes": "Blank Votes", "votes_blanks": "Blanks", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_constitution": "Constitution", "votes_continuing_ballots": "Continuing Ballots", "votes_democrat": "Democrat", "votes_democratic_farmer_labor": "Democratic-Farmer-Labor", "votes_democratic_nonpartisan_league": "Democratic-Nonpartisan League", "votes_green": "Green", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_american": "Independent American", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian", "votes_no_party_preference": "No Party Preference", "votes_no_political_party": "No Political Party", "votes_pacific_green": "Pacific Green", "votes_republican": "Republican", "votes_republican_libertarian": "Republican, Libertarian", "votes_scattering": "Scattering", "votes_u_s_taxpayers": "U.S. Taxpayers", "votes_unaffiliated": "Unaffiliated", "votes_under_votes": "Under Votes", "votes_unenrolled_independent": "Unenrolled Independent", "votes_united_utah": "United Utah", "votes_unity_party": "Unity Party", "votes_working_class": "Working Class", "votes_working_families": "Working Families", "votes_write_in": "Write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 433, "registered_not_positive": 435}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:32:29.848563", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e663c799e4924fd2827ac23d70d2e373", "name": "United States 2022 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 2022, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_others": "All Others", "votes_american_constitution_party": "American Constitution Party", "votes_blank": "Blank", "votes_blank_votes": "Blank Votes", "votes_blanks": "Blanks", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_constitution": "Constitution", "votes_democrat": "Democrat", "votes_democratic_farmer_labor": "Democratic-Farmer-Labor", "votes_green": "Green", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_american": "Independent American", "votes_independent_moderate": "Independent-Moderate", "votes_legal_marijuana_now": "Legal Marijuana NOW", "votes_legal_marijuana_now_2": "Legal Marijuana Now", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian", "votes_liberty_caucus": "Liberty Caucus", "votes_no_party_affiliation": "No Party Affiliation", "votes_pacific_green": "Pacific Green", "votes_progressive": "Progressive", "votes_republican": "Republican", "votes_scattering": "Scattering", "votes_socialist_workers": "Socialist Workers", "votes_u_s_taxpayers": "U.S. Taxpayers", "votes_under_votes": "Under Votes", "votes_united_utah": "United Utah", "votes_working_class": "Working Class", "votes_working_families": "Working Families", "votes_write_in": "Write-in", "votes_write_in_democratic": "Write-in (Democratic)", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 433, "registered_not_positive": 435}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:32:22.726236", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5125ed74575d44208d69b9263ee7d6ff", "name": "United States 2020 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 439)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 2020, CONSTITUENCY level (439 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_others": "All Others", "votes_blank": "Blank", "votes_blank_votes": "Blank Votes", "votes_communist": "Communist", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_constitution": "Constitution", "votes_democratic": "Democratic", "votes_democratic_farmer_labor": "Democratic-Farmer-Labor", "votes_democratic_nonpartisan_league": "Democratic-Nonpartisan League", "votes_grassroots_legalize_cannabis_party": "Grassroots - Legalize Cannabis Party", "votes_green": "Green", "votes_independence": "Independence", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_american": "Independent American", "votes_legal_marijuana_now": "Legal Marijuana Now", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian", "votes_no_party_affliation": "No Party Affliation", "votes_pacific_green": "Pacific Green", "votes_republican": "Republican", "votes_scatter": "Scatter", "votes_scattering": "Scattering", "votes_serve_america_movement": "Serve America Movement", "votes_under_votes": "Under Votes", "votes_unenrolled": "Unenrolled", "votes_united_utah": "United Utah", "votes_unity_party_of_colorado": "Unity Party of Colorado", "votes_working_class": "Working Class", "votes_working_families": "Working Families", "votes_write_in": "Write-in", "votes_write_in_2": "write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 439, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 25, "registered_not_positive": 439, "cast_gt_registered": 438}, "n_stations_flagged": 439, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:32:17.820639", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.754, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.681, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.815, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.734, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.681, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.473, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.429, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.917, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.928, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.085, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.085, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.901, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 439}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "25d2b26a56144fdaa485d7677ea91bbe", "name": "United States 2018 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 434)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 2018, CONSTITUENCY level (434 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american": "American", "votes_blank_votes": "Blank Votes", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_constitution": "Constitution", "votes_democrat": "Democrat", "votes_democratic_farmer_labor": "Democratic-Farmer-Labor", "votes_democratic_nonpartisan_league": "Democratic-Nonpartisan League", "votes_gop": "GOP", "votes_green": "Green", "votes_independence": "Independence", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_american": "Independent American", "votes_legal_marijuana_now": "Legal Marijuana Now", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian", "votes_mountain": "Mountain", "votes_no_party": "No Party", "votes_no_party_affiliation": "No Party Affiliation", "votes_no_party_preference": "No Party Preference", "votes_no_political_party": "No Political Party", "votes_other": "Other", "votes_pacific_green": "Pacific Green", "votes_reform": "Reform", "votes_republican": "Republican", "votes_scattering": "Scattering", "votes_us_taxpayers": "US Taxpayers", "votes_united_utah": "United Utah", "votes_women_s_equality": "Women\u2019s Equality", "votes_working_class": "Working Class", "votes_working_families": "Working Families", "votes_write_in": "Write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 434, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 434, "cast_gt_registered": 427}, "n_stations_flagged": 434, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:32:13.130717", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.382, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.914, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.824, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.739, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.382, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.7, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.527, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.274, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.495, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.407, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.739, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.635, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.935, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.097, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.097, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.903, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 434}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c913019b42fe47d9a762515cbf4fd5f2", "name": "United States 2016 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 2016, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american": "american", "votes_blank": "blank", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_constitution": "constitution", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_non_partisan_league": "democrat - non-partisan league", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_green": "green", "votes_independence": "independence", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_american": "independent american", "votes_legal_marijuana_now": "legal marijuana now", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_liberty_union": "liberty union", "votes_no_party": "no party", "votes_no_party_affiliation": "no party affiliation", "votes_no_party_preference": "no party preference", "votes_no_political_party": "no political party", "votes_others": "others", "votes_pacific_green": "pacific green", "votes_progressive": "progressive", "votes_reform": "reform", "votes_republican": "republican", "votes_republican_tax_revolt": "republican/tax revolt", "votes_u_s_taxpayers": "u.s. taxpayers", "votes_unenrolled": "unenrolled", "votes_women_s_equality": "women's equality", "votes_working_class": "working class", "votes_working_families": "working families", "votes_write_in": "write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 435, "cast_gt_registered": 433}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:32:08.539135", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.259, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.885, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.83, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.259, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.594, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.554, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.495, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.068, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.068, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 14.13, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4592111e617d4f1a802fb4168de021e4", "name": "United States 2014 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 2014, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_others": "all others", "votes_american_s_elect": "american's elect", "votes_blank": "blank", "votes_blank_void_scattering": "blank/void/scattering", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_conservative_libertarian": "conservative, libertarian", "votes_constitution": "constitution", "votes_d_r_party": "d-r party", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_non_partisan_league": "democrat - non-partisan league", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_green": "green", "votes_independence": "independence", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_american": "independent american", "votes_independent_green": "independent green", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_libertarian_party_of_florida": "libertarian party of florida", "votes_no_party_affiliation": "no party affiliation", "votes_none": "none", "votes_pacific_green": "pacific green", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "peace and freedom", "votes_reform": "reform", "votes_republican": "republican", "votes_republican_tax_revolt": "republican/tax revolt", "votes_u_s_taxpayers": "u.s. taxpayers", "votes_unaffiliated": "unaffiliated", "votes_under_votes": "under votes", "votes_working_families": "working families", "votes_write_in": "write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 430, "registered_not_positive": 435}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:32:05.218882", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.89, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.944, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.901, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.848, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.944, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.554, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.189, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.547, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.901, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.73, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.73, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.053, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.053, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b1962e61c2014741a5f041f620f0c23d", "name": "United States 2012 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 2012, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_constitution": "american constitution", "votes_blank": "blank", "votes_blank_scattering": "blank/scattering", "votes_blank_void_scattering": "blank/void/scattering", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_constitution": "constitution", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_non_partisan_league": "democrat - non-partisan league", "votes_democrat_working_families": "democrat, working families", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_green": "green", "votes_independence": "independence", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_american": "independent american", "votes_independent_green": "independent green", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_no_party": "no party", "votes_no_party_affiliation": "no party affiliation", "votes_no_party_preference": "no party preference", "votes_nominated_by_petition": "nominated by petition", "votes_pacific_green": "pacific green", "votes_progressive_libertarian_pacific_gree": "progressive, libertarian, pacific green", "votes_reform": "reform", "votes_republican": "republican", "votes_republican_tax_revolt": "republican, tax revolt", "votes_u_s_taxpayers": "u.s. taxpayers", "votes_unaffiliated": "unaffiliated", "votes_working_families": "working families", "votes_write_in": "write-in", "votes_write_in_democrat": "write-in (democrat)", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 435, "cast_gt_registered": 433}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:32:01.335276", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.78, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.889, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.842, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.984, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.996, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.734, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.715, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.22, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.053, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.053, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Republican", "margin": 23.42, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "05ca8013741b4d54a5e0127486772356", "name": "United States 2010 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 2010, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_constitution": "american constitution", "votes_american_independent": "american independent", "votes_blank_scattering": "blank/scattering", "votes_by_petition": "by petition", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_constitution": "constitution", "votes_constitution_party_of_alabama": "constitution party of alabama", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_democratic_working_families": "democratic, working families", "votes_green": "green", "votes_independence": "independence", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_american": "independent american", "votes_independent_green": "independent green", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_no_party": "no party", "votes_no_party_affiliation": "no party affiliation", "votes_nominated_by_petition": "nominated by petition", "votes_pacific_green_progressive": "pacific green progressive", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "peace and freedom", "votes_reform": "reform", "votes_republican": "republican", "votes_taxpayers": "taxpayers", "votes_tea_party": "tea party", "votes_towne_for_congress": "towne for congress", "votes_u_s_taxpayers": "u.s. taxpayers", "votes_unaffiliated": "unaffiliated", "votes_working_families": "working families", "votes_write_in": "write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 435, "cast_gt_registered": 432}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:31:56.367577", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.696, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.89, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.9, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.848, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.696, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.984, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.996, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.715, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.291, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.054, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.054, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.965, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "936dd5e7e0cd4a14ae183cc14e71362f", "name": "United States 2008 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 2008, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alaskan_independence": "Alaskan Independence", "votes_all_others": "All Others", "votes_blank": "Blank", "votes_blank_scattering": "Blank/Scattering", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_constitution": "Constitution", "votes_democrat": "Democrat", "votes_energy_independence": "Energy Independence", "votes_green": "Green", "votes_green_populist": "Green Populist", "votes_hsing_for_congress": "Hsing for Congress", "votes_independence": "Independence", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_american": "Independent American", "votes_independent_green": "Independent Green", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian", "votes_miscellaneous": "Miscellaneous", "votes_no_party_affiliation": "No Party Affiliation", "votes_other": "Other", "votes_pacific_green": "Pacific Green", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "Peace and Freedom", "votes_progressive": "Progressive", "votes_reform": "Reform", "votes_republican": "Republican", "votes_u_s_taxpayers_party": "U.S. Taxpayers Party", "votes_working_families": "Working Families", "votes_write_in": "Write-In", "votes_write_in_2": "Write-in", "votes_american_constitution": "american constitution", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 430, "registered_not_positive": 435}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:31:51.714441", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.776, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.88, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.9, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.845, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.776, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.983, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.996, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.715, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.579, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Republican", "margin": 35.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e6ebe2fd1f0b4a6e919badf0ab4aa51e", "name": "United States 2006 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 2006, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_independent": "american independent", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_constitution": "constitution", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_green": "green", "votes_independence": "independence", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_unenrolled": "independent (unenrolled)", "votes_independent_american": "independent american", "votes_independent_green": "independent green", "votes_let_s_do_it": "let's do it", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_no_party_affiliation": "no party affiliation", "votes_nominated_by_petition": "nominated by petition", "votes_nonpartisan": "nonpartisan", "votes_others": "others", "votes_pacific_green": "pacific green", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "peace and freedom", "votes_progressive": "progressive", "votes_reform": "reform", "votes_republican": "republican", "votes_scattering": "scattering", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_u_s_taxpayers": "u.s. taxpayers", "votes_unenrolled": "unenrolled", "votes_unity": "unity", "votes_wisconsin_green": "wisconsin green", "votes_working_families": "working families", "votes_write_in": "write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 435, "cast_gt_registered": 420}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:31:47.199811", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.749, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.948, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.862, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.801, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.749, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.983, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.996, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.691, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.74, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c2d52e56d7804880b31506adc2606763", "name": "United States 2004 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 2004, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_others": "all others", "votes_american_constitution": "american constitution", "votes_american_independent": "american independent", "votes_blank_scattering": "blank/scattering", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_constitution": "constitution", "votes_constitution_party_of_florida": "constitution party of florida", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_green": "green", "votes_independence": "independence", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_green": "independent (green)", "votes_independent_libertarian": "independent (libertarian)", "votes_independent_u_s_marijuana_party": "independent (u.s. marijuana party)", "votes_independent_american": "independent american", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_nonpartisan": "nonpartisan", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "peace and freedom", "votes_peace_and_justice": "peace and justice", "votes_personal_choice": "personal choice", "votes_reform": "reform", "votes_republican": "republican", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_equality": "socialist equality", "votes_u_s_taxpayers": "u.s. taxpayers", "votes_unaffiliated": "unaffiliated", "votes_wisconsin_green": "wisconsin green", "votes_working_families": "working families", "votes_write_in": "write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 415, "registered_not_positive": 435}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:31:41.999754", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.384, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.862, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.799, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.384, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.041, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Republican", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Democratic", "margin": 6.51, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a52c2c2ae5784cbc92be684e09eccd0d", "name": "United States 2002 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 2002, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_independent": "american independent", "votes_blank_scattering": "blank/scattering", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_constitution": "constitution", "votes_constitution_party_of_florida": "constitution party of florida", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_non_partisan_league": "democrat - non-partisan league", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_green": "green", "votes_illinois_green": "illinois green", "votes_independence": "independence", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_green": "independent (green)", "votes_independent_libertarian": "independent (libertarian)", "votes_independent_american": "independent american", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_natural_law": "natural law", "votes_no_new_taxes": "no new taxes", "votes_no_party_affiliation": "no party affiliation", "votes_others": "others", "votes_reform": "reform", "votes_republican": "republican", "votes_right_to_life": "right to life", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_u_s_taxpayers": "u.s. taxpayers", "votes_united_citizens": "united citizens", "votes_wisconsin_green": "wisconsin green", "votes_working_families": "working families", "votes_write_in": "write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 419, "registered_not_positive": 435}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:31:38.301081", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.397, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.829, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.905, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.651, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2cbae8de39cf40b9937bc16075b2b1d0", "name": "United States 2000 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2000, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 2000, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alaskan_independence": "alaskan independence", "votes_american_constitution": "american constitution", "votes_american_independent": "american independent", "votes_blank_scattering": "blank/scattering", "votes_concerned_citizens": "concerned citizens", "votes_conscience_for_congress": "conscience for congress", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_constitution": "constitution", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_non_partisan_league": "democrat - non-partisan league", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_democratic_liberty_union": "democratic - liberty union", "votes_green": "green", "votes_independence": "independence", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_american": "independent american", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_natural_law": "natural law", "votes_others": "others", "votes_pacific_green": "pacific green", "votes_reform": "reform", "votes_republican": "republican", "votes_right_to_life": "right to life", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_u_s_taxpayers": "u.s. taxpayers", "votes_unenrolled": "unenrolled", "votes_united_citizens": "united citizens", "votes_working_families": "working families", "votes_write_in": "write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 435, "cast_gt_registered": 430}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:31:33.822099", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.855, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.489, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.867, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.808, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.489, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.823, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.748, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.691, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Republican", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Democratic", "margin": 0.93, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 2000, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "aff70d838e4e41bea988f2a343873f0e", "name": "United States 1998 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1998, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1998, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_heritage": "american heritage", "votes_american_independent": "american independent", "votes_blank_scattering": "blank/scattering", "votes_concerned_citizens": "concerned citizens", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_constitutional": "constitutional", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_non_partisan_league": "democrat - non-partisan league", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_green": "green", "votes_independence": "independence", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_american": "independent american", "votes_legal_marijuana_now": "legal marijuana now", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_minnesota_taxpayers": "minnesota taxpayers", "votes_natural_law": "natural law", "votes_others": "others", "votes_pacific": "pacific", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "peace and freedom", "votes_reform": "reform", "votes_republican": "republican", "votes_right_to_life": "right to life", "votes_scattering": "scattering", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_taxpayers": "taxpayers", "votes_u_s_taxpayers": "u.s. taxpayers", "votes_write_in": "write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 408, "registered_not_positive": 435}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:31:29.043738", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.737, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.871, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.81, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.745, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "753299e4f5634ccfa10c0105201ee3b8", "name": "United States 1996 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1996, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1996, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_a_connecticut_party": "a connecticut party", "votes_american_independent": "american independent", "votes_americans": "americans", "votes_blank_scattering": "blank/scattering", "votes_concerned_citizens": "concerned citizens", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_freedom": "freedom", "votes_grass_roots": "grass roots", "votes_green": "green", "votes_independence": "independence", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_american": "independent american", "votes_independent_reform": "independent/reform", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_natural_law": "natural law", "votes_nonpartisan": "nonpartisan", "votes_pacific": "pacific", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "peace and freedom", "votes_reform": "reform", "votes_republican": "republican", "votes_right_to_life": "right to life", "votes_save_medicare": "save medicare", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_u_s_taxpayers": "u.s. taxpayers", "votes_virginia_reform": "virginia reform", "votes_write_in": "write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 426, "registered_not_positive": 435}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:31:22.714476", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.737, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.888, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.869, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.808, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.905, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.278, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.749, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.706, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Republican", "margin": 40.9, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1996, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "73e674b08a7649ce98c6a565a6eab2bf", "name": "United States 1994 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1994, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1994, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_a_connecticut_party": "a connecticut party", "votes_american": "american", "votes_american_independent": "american independent", "votes_cash_for_congress": "cash for congress", "votes_concerned_citizens": "concerned citizens", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_grass_roots": "grass roots", "votes_green": "green", "votes_gun_control": "gun control", "votes_independence_fusion": "independence fusion", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_american": "independent american", "votes_independent_maine_greens": "independent maine greens", "votes_independent_nomination": "independent nomination", "votes_independent_republican": "independent-republican", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_mississippi_taxpayers": "mississippi taxpayers", "votes_natural_law": "natural law", "votes_no_party_affiliation": "no party affiliation", "votes_patriot": "patriot", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "peace and freedom", "votes_republican": "republican", "votes_right_to_life": "right-to-life", "votes_scattering": "scattering", "votes_taxpayers": "taxpayers", "votes_u_s_taxpayers": "u.s. taxpayers", "votes_write_in": "write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 416, "registered_not_positive": 435}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:31:18.692157", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.734, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.867, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.806, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.734, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.267, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.746, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.705, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.705, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6fa5f0320d9d48f3a95f686fffd9666c", "name": "United States 1992 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1992, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1992, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_a_connecticut_party": "a connecticut party", "votes_alaskan_independence": "alaskan independence", "votes_american_grass_roots_alternative": "american grass roots alternative", "votes_concerned_citizens": "concerned citizens", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_economic_recovery": "economic recovery", "votes_for_the_people": "for the people", "votes_grass_roots": "grass roots", "votes_green": "green", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_for_change": "independent for change", "votes_independent_voters": "independent voters", "votes_independent_republican": "independent-republican", "votes_independents_for_perot": "independents for perot", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_louanner_peters_party": "louanner peters party", "votes_natural_law": "natural law", "votes_no_party_affiliation": "no party affiliation", "votes_others": "others", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "peace and freedom", "votes_perot_choice": "perot choice", "votes_republican": "republican", "votes_right_to_life": "right-to-life", "votes_scattering": "scattering", "votes_unenrolled": "unenrolled", "votes_unenrolled_independent": "unenrolled/independent", "votes_write_in": "write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 422, "registered_not_positive": 435}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:31:12.641030", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.731, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.895, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.872, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.809, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.731, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.272, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 1992, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.872, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.809, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.706, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Republican", "margin": 37.54, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1992, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "683b02e9a1fc4bb5a594c0acc0ea3791", "name": "United States 1990 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1990, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1990, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american": "american", "votes_american_independent": "american independent", "votes_american_systems_independent_pa": "american systems independent (pa)", "votes_back_to_basics_nj90": "back to basics (nj90)", "votes_better_affordable_government_nj": "better affordable government (nj)", "votes_bronx_voters_party_ny": "bronx voters party (ny)", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_illinois_solidarity_party": "illinois solidarity party", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_conservative": "independent conservative", "votes_independent_reform": "independent reform", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_jim_wham_party_jwp": "jim wham party (jwp)", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_liberty": "liberty", "votes_liberty_union": "liberty union", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_new_alliance_party": "new alliance party", "votes_others": "others", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "peace and freedom", "votes_populist": "populist", "votes_right_to_life": "right to life", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_tax_brake_ny": "tax brake (ny)", "votes_tisch": "tisch", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_world_without_war_nj90": "world without war (nj90)", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 435, "cast_gt_registered": 407}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:31:08.370453", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.738, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.888, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.863, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.8, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.254, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 1990, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 1990, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.692, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f4c137f8a6164789a229d1d93d69360c", "name": "United States 1988 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1988, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1988, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american": "american", "votes_american_independent": "american independent", "votes_citizens_against_rising_electric_rat": "citizens against rising electric rates", "votes_communist": "communist", "votes_concerns_of_people": "concerns of people", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_drug_fighter_party": "drug fighter party", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_independent_tax_watchdog": "independent tax watchdog", "votes_jobs_party": "jobs party", "votes_land_water_legacy": "land water legacy", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_new_alliance_party": "new alliance party", "votes_others": "others", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "peace and freedom", "votes_people_s_choice": "people's choice", "votes_populist": "populist", "votes_pro_life_conservative": "pro-life conservative", "votes_right_to_life": "right to life", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_solidarity": "solidarity", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_vote_children_88": "vote children '88", "votes_war_against_aids": "war against aids", "votes_workers_against_concessions_wac": "workers against concessions (wac)", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 435, "cast_gt_registered": 402}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:31:03.499179", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.721, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.889, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.862, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.797, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.721, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 1988, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 1988, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.797, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 1988, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.68, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 1988, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.074, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.074, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Republican", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Democratic", "margin": 58.55, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1988, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9ee995a1a4bb4cc0939b4c6c4498e787", "name": "United States 1986 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1986, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1986, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_amber_waves_grain": "amber waves grain", "votes_american": "american", "votes_concerns_of_people": "concerns of people", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_neighbors": "independent neighbors", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_inflation_fighting_housewife": "inflation fighting housewife", "votes_labor_and_farm": "labor and farm", "votes_labor_for_maine": "labor for maine", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_liberty_union": "liberty union", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_new_alliance_party": "new alliance party", "votes_others": "others", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "peace and freedom", "votes_people_before_profits": "people before profits", "votes_populist": "populist", "votes_pro_life_anti_abortion": "pro life, anti-abortion", "votes_pro_life": "pro-life", "votes_ratepayers_against_lilco": "ratepayers against lilco", "votes_right_to_life": "right to life", "votes_small_is_beautiful": "small is beautiful", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_worker_s_league": "worker's league", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 405, "registered_not_positive": 435}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:30:58.629308", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.728, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.891, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.857, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.792, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.728, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.273, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 1986, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 1986, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 1986, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 1986, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.078, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.078, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "df84a65077244363b58e9bfef791b55b", "name": "United States 1984 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1984, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1984, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alabama_libertarian": "alabama libertarian", "votes_american": "american", "votes_american_eagle_pennsylvania_1984": "american eagle (pennsylvania, 1984)", "votes_american_independent": "american independent", "votes_citizens": "citizens", "votes_colorado_libertarian": "colorado libertarian", "votes_communist": "communist", "votes_concerns_of_people": "concerns of people", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_constitutionalist": "constitutionalist", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_labor_and_farm": "labor and farm", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_libertyu_union_citizen_s_party_vermo": "libertyu union-citizen's party (vermont, 1984)", "votes_middle_class_candidate": "middle class candidate", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_nuclear_freeze": "nuclear freeze", "votes_others": "others", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "peace and freedom", "votes_people_before_profits": "people before profits", "votes_populist": "populist", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_rainbow_coalition": "rainbow coalition", "votes_ratepayers_against_lilco": "ratepayers against lilco", "votes_right_to_life": "right to life", "votes_small_is_beautiful": "small is beautiful", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 435, "cast_gt_registered": 407}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:30:54.258197", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.737, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.889, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.86, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.794, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.255, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 1984, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 1984, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 1984, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.676, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 1984, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.078, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.078, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Republican", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Democratic", "margin": 95.16, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1984, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "011b729cd2784b22a480f0bdb87eb977", "name": "United States 1982 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 429)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1982, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1982 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (429 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alabama_libertarian": "alabama libertarian", "votes_american": "american", "votes_american_independent": "american independent", "votes_anti_drug": "anti-drug", "votes_bipartisan_good_government": "bipartisan good government", "votes_citizens": "citizens", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_consumer": "consumer", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_free_peoples": "free peoples", "votes_independence": "independence", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_neighbors": "independent neighbors", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_krill_for_congress": "krill for congress", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_liberty_union": "liberty union", "votes_milton_street": "milton street", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_nuclear_freeze": "nuclear freeze", "votes_others": "others", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "peace and freedom", "votes_republican": "republican", "votes_right_to_life": "right to life", "votes_small_is_beautiful": "small is beautiful", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_worker_s_league": "worker's league", "votes_young_socialist_alliance": "young socialist alliance", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 429, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 429, "cast_gt_registered": 423}, "n_stations_flagged": 429, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:30:50.101618", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.723, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.89, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.856, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.791, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.723, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.905, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.279, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 1982, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.905, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 1982, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.791, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 1982, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 1982, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.078, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.078, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 429}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "da96d8a7b3444cc687196fbb840df5fc", "name": "United States 1980 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1980, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1980, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "Democrat", "votes_adams_republican": "adams republican", "votes_alabama_libertarian": "alabama libertarian", "votes_american_independent": "american independent", "votes_citizens": "citizens", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_constitution_party_of_illinois": "constitution party of illinois", "votes_consumer": "consumer", "votes_democrat_2": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_free_libertarian": "free libertarian", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_neighbors": "independent neighbors", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_liberty_union": "liberty union", "votes_middle_class_candidate": "middle class candidate", "votes_modern_republican": "modern Republican", "votes_modern_republican_2": "modern republican", "votes_morris_for_congress": "morris for congress", "votes_others": "others", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "peace and freedom", "votes_people_s_independent": "people's independent", "votes_pro_life": "pro-life", "votes_republican": "republican", "votes_right_to_life": "right to life", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_statesman": "statesman", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 416, "registered_not_positive": 435}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:30:46.332246", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.722, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.883, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.844, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.778, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.722, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.26, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.667, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 1980, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Republican", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Democratic", "margin": 81.78, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1980, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9d7c0fd858ae41b08e187f1fcedb4536", "name": "United States 1978 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1978, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1978, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "Democrat", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_alabama_conservative": "alabama conservative", "votes_always_for_people": "always for people", "votes_american": "american", "votes_american_independent": "american independent", "votes_american_party_of_minnesota": "american party of minnesota", "votes_communist": "communist", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_democrat_2": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_independent_2": "independent", "votes_independent_neighbors": "independent neighbors", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_la_raza_unida": "la raza unida", "votes_labor_party": "labor party", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_liberty_union": "liberty union", "votes_modern_republican": "modern Republican", "votes_modern_republican_2": "modern republican", "votes_none_of_these_candidates": "none of these candidates", "votes_others": "others", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "peace and freedom", "votes_people_s_independent": "people's independent", "votes_republican": "republican", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_united_states_labor_party": "united states labor party", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_workers_communist_party_of_america": "workers (communist) party of america", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 406, "registered_not_positive": 435}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:30:40.879203", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.717, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.834, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.768, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.796, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.274, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 1978, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 1978, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 1978, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 1978, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 1978, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.653, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 1978, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.054, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.054, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "66679a412d8441fa8ef2e1bbd6fdc8f4", "name": "United States 1976 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1976, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1976, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american": "american", "votes_american_constitution": "american constitution", "votes_american_independent": "american independent", "votes_american_party_of_iowa": "american party of iowa", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_constitutional": "constitutional", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_george_wallace_party": "george wallace party", "votes_human_rights": "human rights", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_american": "independent american", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_independent_vermonters_party": "independent vermonters party", "votes_individual_americans_independence": "individual americans independence", "votes_la_raza_unida": "la raza unida", "votes_labor": "labor", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_none_of_these_candidates": "none of these candidates", "votes_others": "others", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "peace and freedom", "votes_people_s_independent": "people's independent", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_silent_majority": "silent majority", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_united_states_labor_party": "united states labor party", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_workers_communist_party_of_america": "workers (communist) party of america", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 435, "cast_gt_registered": 422}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:30:36.393263", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.729, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.889, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.791, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.726, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.729, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.261, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.791, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.054, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.054, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Republican", "margin": 10.59, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1976, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9c001cf3865e4d8abdb150f3e68b7451", "name": "United States 1974 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1974, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1974, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "Democrat", "votes_alabama_conservative": "alabama conservative", "votes_alabama_independent_democrat": "alabama independent democrat", "votes_american": "american", "votes_american_independent": "american independent", "votes_communist": "communist", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_constitutional": "constitutional", "votes_democrat_2": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_economic_justice": "economic justice", "votes_george_wallace_party": "george wallace party", "votes_good_neighbor": "good neighbor", "votes_human_rights": "human rights", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_american": "independent american", "votes_independent_citizens_action": "independent citizens' action", "votes_independent_voters": "independent voters", "votes_labor": "labor", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_liberty_union": "liberty union", "votes_life_liberty_and_justice": "life, liberty and justice", "votes_modern_republican": "modern Republican", "votes_modern_republican_2": "modern republican", "votes_national_democratic_party_of_alabama": "national democratic party of alabama", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "peace and freedom", "votes_republican": "republican", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_united_states_labor_party": "united states labor party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 409, "registered_not_positive": 435}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:30:32.584532", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.456, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.891, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.765, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.696, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.798, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1974, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.116, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 1974, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 1974, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 1974, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.696, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.073, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "422160b8adcb439e879eb8f4fee284a4", "name": "United States 1972 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1972, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1972, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_action_party": "action party", "votes_alabama_conservative": "alabama conservative", "votes_american": "american", "votes_american_independent": "american independent", "votes_american_independent_conservative": "american independent conservative", "votes_communist": "communist", "votes_concerned_and_capable": "concerned and capable", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_constitutional": "constitutional", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_george_wallace_party": "george wallace party", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_conservative": "independent conservative", "votes_independent_new_mexican": "independent new mexican", "votes_la_raza_unida": "la raza unida", "votes_less_federal_taxes": "less federal taxes", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_minnesota_taxpayers": "minnesota taxpayers", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_national_democratic_party_of_alabama": "national democratic party of alabama", "votes_others": "others", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "peace and freedom", "votes_people_s": "people's", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_protest_progress_dignity": "protest,progress,dignity", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 407, "registered_not_positive": 435}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:30:27.492780", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.278, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.736, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.659, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.278, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.794, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.116, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1972, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 1972, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.659, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 1972, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.567, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.567, "year": 1972, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.073, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Republican", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Democratic", "margin": 93.49, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1972, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "01104a572a0743bd937551333ab029fb", "name": "United States 1970 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1970, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1970, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_a_public_party": "a public party", "votes_america_first_party": "america - first party", "votes_american": "american", "votes_american_independent": "american independent", "votes_american_party_of_missouri": "american party of missouri", "votes_buffalo": "buffalo", "votes_civil_service_independents": "civil service independents", "votes_common_people_s": "common people's", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_constitutional": "constitutional", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_dodd_independent": "dodd independent", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_for_peace": "independent for peace", "votes_iowa_new": "iowa new", "votes_la_raza_unida": "la raza unida", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_liberty_union": "liberty union", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_national_conservative_party": "national conservative party", "votes_national_democratic_party_of_alabama": "national democratic party of alabama", "votes_others": "others", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "peace and freedom", "votes_peoples_constitutional": "peoples constitutional", "votes_right_to_life": "right to life", "votes_silent_majority": "silent majority", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_urban_tax_reform": "urban tax reform", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 435, "cast_gt_registered": 406}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:30:22.815034", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.392, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.897, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.718, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.639, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.392, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1970, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.753, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.938, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 1970, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.116, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 1970, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1970, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.594, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 1970, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.718, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.718, "year": 1970, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 1970, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.552, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 1970, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.071, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5bc5b714dd9346579fb283c98230bcb7", "name": "United States 1968 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 434)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1968, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1968, CONSTITUENCY level (434 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_abolish_port_authority": "abolish port authority", "votes_american_anti_communist_party": "american anti-communist party", "votes_american_independent": "american independent", "votes_citizens": "citizens", "votes_common_sense": "common sense", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_constitution": "constitution", "votes_deescalators": "deescalators", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_denver_independent_party": "denver independent party", "votes_essex_conservative_party": "essex conservative party", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_industrial_government": "industrial government", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_national_democratic_party_of_alabama": "national democratic party of alabama", "votes_new_party": "new party", "votes_new_politics": "new politics", "votes_no_additional_taxes": "no additional taxes", "votes_others": "others", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "peace and freedom", "votes_primary_party": "primary party", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_the_independent_s_choice": "the independent's choice", "votes_trt_tax_payers_ticket": "trt tax payers ticket", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_voice_of_independence": "voice of independence", "votes_wisconsin_congress_of_conservatives": "wisconsin congress of conservatives", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 434, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 434, "cast_gt_registered": 411}, "n_stations_flagged": 434, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:30:18.548330", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.392, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.7, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.602, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.392, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1968, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.691, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 1968, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1968, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1968, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 1968, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.7, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 1968, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.602, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 1968, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.46, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.46, "year": 1968, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 1968, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.054, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.054, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 20.45, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1968, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 434}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "88616b7d44124f26871faf5d631828db", "name": "United States 1966 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 433)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1966, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1966, CONSTITUENCY level (433 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_peoples": "all peoples", "votes_american_constitution": "american constitution", "votes_american_independent": "american independent", "votes_citizens_peace": "citizens peace", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_constitution": "constitution", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_socialist": "independent socialist", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_new_hispano": "new hispano", "votes_others": "others", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "peace and freedom", "votes_peace_equal_rights": "peace equal rights", "votes_people_s_choice_the": "people's choice, the", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_the_ohara_bill_party": "the ohara bill party", "votes_united_for_peace": "united for peace", "votes_united_taxpayers": "united taxpayers", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_veterans": "veterans", "votes_voters_for_peace": "voters for peace"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 433, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 412, "registered_not_positive": 433}, "n_stations_flagged": 433, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:30:14.222002", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.717, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.89, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.693, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.594, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.687, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.969, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 1966, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1966, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1966, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.593, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 1966, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.693, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.693, "year": 1966, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.594, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.594, "year": 1966, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.454, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.454, "year": 1966, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.823, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 1966, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.054, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.054, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 433}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6813ebb09ec64b7c9a3554e5c828b590", "name": "United States 1964 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 433)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1964, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1964, CONSTITUENCY level (433 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american": "american", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_constitution": "constitution", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_eliminate_foreign_aid": "eliminate foreign aid", "votes_freedom_now": "freedom now", "votes_freedom_socialist": "freedom-socialist", "votes_good_government": "good government", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_national_states_rights": "national states rights", "votes_new_day_independent": "new day independent", "votes_others": "others", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_righteous_government_platform": "righteous government platform", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_united_taxpayers": "united taxpayers", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 433, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 433, "cast_gt_registered": 412}, "n_stations_flagged": 433, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:30:10.573763", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.729, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.887, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.678, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.572, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.729, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.986, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.747, "year": 1964, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1964, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1964, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.595, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 1964, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.678, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.678, "year": 1964, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.572, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.572, "year": 1964, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.411, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.411, "year": 1964, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 1964, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 80.66, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1964, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 433}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "afdaa273f2914056aa685ea2262ea2d0", "name": "United States 1962 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 426)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1962, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1962, CONSTITUENCY level (426 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_conservative_republican": "independent conservative republican", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_national_states_rights": "national states rights", "votes_occion_popular": "occion popular", "votes_others": "others", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_voters_for_peace": "voters for peace"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 426, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 426, "cast_gt_registered": 394}, "n_stations_flagged": 426, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:30:04.847572", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.718, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.886, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.668, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.56, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.718, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.69, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.982, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 1962, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1962, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1962, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.594, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 1962, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.668, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 1962, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.56, "year": 1962, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.377, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.377, "year": 1962, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 1962, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 426}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7cedc3bc10aa4dab80bcbc6655d15753", "name": "United States 1960 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1960, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1960, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_constitutional": "constitutional", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_american": "independent american", "votes_independent_anti_tax": "independent anti-tax", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_social_democrat": "social democrat", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_tax_cut": "tax cut", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 435, "cast_gt_registered": 388}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:30:00.008246", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.392, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.743, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.649, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.544, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.392, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1960, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1960, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 1960, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.991, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.748, "year": 1960, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1960, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1960, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 1960, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.649, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 1960, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.544, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 1960, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.367, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.367, "year": 1960, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 1960, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1960, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 1960, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 1960, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 15.64, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1960, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e3b464c5071c44e0b3096f0cee142245", "name": "United States 1958 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 431)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1958, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1958 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (431 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_communist_labor": "communist labor", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_constitution": "constitution", "votes_constitutional": "constitutional", "votes_decency_and_vigilance": "decency and vigilance", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_freedom_through_victory": "freedom through victory", "votes_freee_democrat": "freee democrat", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independents_for_economy": "independents for economy", "votes_keep_people_working": "keep people working", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_light_a_candle": "light a candle", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_progress_integrity_economy": "progress-integrity-economy", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_social_democrat": "social democrat", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_taxation_with_representation": "taxation with representation", "votes_taxpayers_only_friend": "taxpayers only friend", "votes_the_peoples_friend": "the peoples friend", "votes_united_taxpayers": "united taxpayers", "votes_unity_for_justice": "unity for justice", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 431, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 431, "cast_gt_registered": 362}, "n_stations_flagged": 431, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:29:55.385639", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.726, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.9, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.625, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.527, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.726, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1958, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.9, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1958, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1958, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.791, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.448, "year": 1958, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1958, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1958, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.598, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 1958, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 1958, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.527, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 1958, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.343, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.343, "year": 1958, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 1958, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1958, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 1958, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 1958, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 431}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "015539ca31db44f9b4500d799f96cc08", "name": "United States 1956 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 430)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1956, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1956 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (430 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_third_party": "american third party", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_constitutional": "constitutional", "votes_decency_in_government": "decency in government", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_free_honest_elections": "free honest elections", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_independent_teacher_veteran": "independent teacher veteran", "votes_independent_veterans": "independent veterans", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_progress_through_freedom": "progress through freedom", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_tax_payers": "tax payers", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_virginia_social_democrat": "virginia social democrat"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 430, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 374, "registered_not_positive": 430}, "n_stations_flagged": 430, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:29:50.743959", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.722, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.889, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.616, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.517, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.722, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 1956, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1956, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1956, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.792, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.448, "year": 1956, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1956, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1956, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.593, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 1956, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.616, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 1956, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.517, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 1956, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.337, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.337, "year": 1956, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.773, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.773, "year": 1956, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1956, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 1956, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 1956, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 72.31, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1956, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 430}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "059c380229dd4d748171e6b00b044bd1", "name": "United States 1954 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 430)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1954, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1954 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (430 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_labor": "american labor", "votes_constitutional": "constitutional", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_progressive": "independent progressive", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_militant_workers": "militant workers", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_progressive": "progressive", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_virginia_social_democrat": "virginia social democrat"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 430, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 370, "registered_not_positive": 430}, "n_stations_flagged": 430, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:29:46.369542", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.723, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.608, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.516, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.723, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1954, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1954, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.74, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1954, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.794, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 1954, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1954, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1954, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.594, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 1954, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.608, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.608, "year": 1954, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.516, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.516, "year": 1954, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.326, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.326, "year": 1954, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 1954, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1954, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 1954, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.785, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 1954, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 430}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "baf6d5c8524549f88b5a0f2dfe53017a", "name": "United States 1952 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 430)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1952, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1952 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (430 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_labor": "american labor", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_increase_jobless_pay": "increase jobless pay", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_citizens_committee": "independent citizens committee", "votes_independent_labor": "independent labor", "votes_independent_progressive": "independent progressive", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_people_s_choice_the": "people's choice, the", "votes_people_s_rights": "people's rights", "votes_progressive": "progressive", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_square_deal": "square deal", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 430, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 430, "cast_gt_registered": 382}, "n_stations_flagged": 430, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:29:42.197079", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.897, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.611, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.522, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1952, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1952, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1952, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 1952, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1952, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1952, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.594, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 1952, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.611, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.611, "year": 1952, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.522, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.522, "year": 1952, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.335, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 1952, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 1952, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1952, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 1952, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 1952, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 66.48, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1952, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 430}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ebfd04d721cd4abab00edb080d21fdb7", "name": "United States 1950 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 430)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1950, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1950 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (430 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_labor": "american labor", "votes_christian_nationalist": "christian nationalist", "votes_constitutional": "constitutional", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_fusion": "fusion", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_peoples_choice": "independent peoples choice", "votes_independent_progressive": "independent progressive", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_people_s": "people's", "votes_progressive": "progressive", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_social_democrat": "social democrat", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_state_rights_democrat": "state rights democrat", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 430, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 369, "registered_not_positive": 430}, "n_stations_flagged": 430, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:29:38.239437", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.729, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.891, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.585, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.502, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.729, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1950, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1950, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.745, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1950, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.789, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.447, "year": 1950, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1950, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1950, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 1950, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.585, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.585, "year": 1950, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.502, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.502, "year": 1950, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.32, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.32, "year": 1950, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 1950, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1950, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 1950, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 1950, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 430}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6b8cd3b507644f77af5ea53c29c919ab", "name": "United States 1948 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 430)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1948, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1948 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (430 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_labor": "american labor", "votes_communist": "communist", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_progressive": "independent progressive", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_new_progressive": "new progressive", "votes_others": "others", "votes_people_s": "people's", "votes_peoples_progressive": "peoples progressive", "votes_progressive": "progressive", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_workers": "workers"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 430, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 430, "cast_gt_registered": 384}, "n_stations_flagged": 430, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:29:34.207279", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.388, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.743, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.603, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.51, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.388, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 1948, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1948, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 1948, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 1948, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1948, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1948, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.404, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.601, "year": 1948, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 1948, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.51, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.51, "year": 1948, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.323, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.323, "year": 1948, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 1948, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1948, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.062, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.062, "year": 1948, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.786, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 1948, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 21.47, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1948, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 430}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0b59edb6157349d7a3a03d36df2586da", "name": "United States 1946 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 429)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1946, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1946 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (429 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_250_00_state_bonds": "$250.00 state bonds", "votes_american_labor": "american labor", "votes_cluney_taxpayers_good_government": "cluney taxpayers good government", "votes_communist": "communist", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_progressive": "independent progressive", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_justice_decency_independence": "justice, decency, independence", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_no_foreign_loans": "no foreign loans", "votes_others": "others", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_revolutionary_workers": "revolutionary workers", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_sullivan_independent_voters": "sullivan independent voters", "votes_united_citizen": "united citizen", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_veterans_farmer": "veterans farmer", "votes_veterans_victory": "veterans victory", "votes_workers": "workers"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 429, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 384, "registered_not_positive": 429}, "n_stations_flagged": 429, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:29:29.789295", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.729, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.89, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.602, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.506, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.729, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1946, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1946, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 1946, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 1946, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.569, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.642, "year": 1946, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1946, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.387, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 1946, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.602, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 1946, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 1946, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.322, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.322, "year": 1946, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.758, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.758, "year": 1946, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1946, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.062, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.062, "year": 1946, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 1946, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 429}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "738ffc76d09142d082ba3e230fc872dd", "name": "United States 1944 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 429)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1944, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1944 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (429 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_labor": "american labor", "votes_constitutional": "constitutional", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "democrat-farmer-labor", "votes_fellowship": "fellowship", "votes_good_government": "good government", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_jeffersonian": "jeffersonian", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_mich_comm_fed": "mich. comm. fed.", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_pres_amer_ind": "pres. amer. ind.", "votes_progressive": "progressive", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_victory_without_hate": "victory without hate"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 429, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 388, "registered_not_positive": 429}, "n_stations_flagged": 429, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:29:24.806144", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.717, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.548, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.456, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1944, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1944, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 1944, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.447, "year": 1944, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.773, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 1944, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1944, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.386, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 1944, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.548, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 1944, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 1944, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.294, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.294, "year": 1944, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 1944, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 1944, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 1944, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 1944, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 429}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d263a28a328049cc811e1a9ea6173e0b", "name": "United States 1942 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 428)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1942, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1942 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (428 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_labor": "american labor", "votes_american_progress": "american progress", "votes_citizens_progressive": "citizens progressive", "votes_city_fusion": "city fusion", "votes_communist": "communist", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_farmer_labor": "farmer-labor", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_labor": "independent labor", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_national_recovery": "national recovery", "votes_others": "others", "votes_pro_townsend": "pro, townsend", "votes_progressive": "progressive", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_soc_re": "soc. re.", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_townsend": "townsend", "votes_union": "union", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_win_the_war": "win the war"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 428, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 365, "registered_not_positive": 428}, "n_stations_flagged": 428, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:29:18.902368", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.727, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.888, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.548, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.456, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.727, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1942, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1942, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.588, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 1942, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.771, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 1942, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.773, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 1942, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1942, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 1942, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.548, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 1942, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 1942, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.296, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.296, "year": 1942, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 1942, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 1942, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 1942, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 1942, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 428}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "434d283e98064f98a49bf08c2c5d58de", "name": "United States 1940 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 428)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1940, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1940 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (428 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_labor": "american labor", "votes_buono_food_plan": "buono food plan", "votes_communist": "communist", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_farmer_labor": "farmer-labor", "votes_fifteen_dollar_pension": "fifteen dollar pension", "votes_fusion": "fusion", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_for_labor": "independent for labor", "votes_independent_liberal": "independent liberal", "votes_independent_lincoln_principles": "independent lincoln principles", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_jersey_pension": "jersey pension", "votes_keep_america_neutral": "keep america neutral", "votes_liberal_democrat": "liberal democrat", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_no_wage_tax": "no wage tax", "votes_others": "others", "votes_peace": "peace", "votes_progressive": "progressive", "votes_progressive_labor": "progressive labor", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_roosevelt_new_deal": "roosevelt new deal", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_state_rights": "state rights", "votes_union": "union", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_workers": "workers", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 428, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 428, "cast_gt_registered": 389}, "n_stations_flagged": 428, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:29:12.627090", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.717, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.895, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.57, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.472, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1940, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1940, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.586, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 1940, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.451, "year": 1940, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.773, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 1940, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1940, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.388, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 1940, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 1940, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.472, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.472, "year": 1940, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.307, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.307, "year": 1940, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 1940, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 1940, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 1940, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 1940, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 428}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7ebace081d44429bb32191d11ed57c7f", "name": "United States 1938 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 428)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1938, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1938 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (428 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_labor": "american labor", "votes_andrew_jackson": "andrew jackson", "votes_city_fusion": "city fusion", "votes_communist": "communist", "votes_constitutional_democrat": "constitutional democrat", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_farmer_labor": "farmer-labor", "votes_general_welfare": "general welfare", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_progressive": "independent progressive", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_independent_socialist": "independent socialist", "votes_industrial_government": "industrial government", "votes_kenny_for_congress": "kenny for congress", "votes_labor": "labor", "votes_liberal_labor_choice": "liberal labor choice", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_open_book": "open book", "votes_others": "others", "votes_pensions_for_everybody": "pensions for everybody", "votes_progressive": "progressive", "votes_progressive_democrat": "progressive democrat", "votes_progressive_labor": "progressive labor", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_socialist_workers": "socialist workers", "votes_townsend": "townsend", "votes_union": "union", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 428, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 428, "cast_gt_registered": 370}, "n_stations_flagged": 428, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:29:08.411748", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.725, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.889, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.562, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.47, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.725, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1938, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1938, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.504, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 1938, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 1938, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1938, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1938, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.014, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 1938, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.562, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 1938, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.47, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.47, "year": 1938, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.294, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.294, "year": 1938, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 1938, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1938, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 1938, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.797, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 1938, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 428}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fb88f205b51948d89fbad0768afd0d5d", "name": "United States 1936 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 428)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1936, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1936 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (428 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_peoples": "all peoples", "votes_american_labor": "american labor", "votes_communist": "communist", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_ecpole": "ecpole", "votes_farmer_labor": "farmer-labor", "votes_father_coughlin_s_principles": "father coughlin's principles", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_progressive": "progressive", "votes_progressive_democrat": "progressive democrat", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_prosperity": "prosperity", "votes_social_justice_union": "social justice union", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_square_deal": "square deal", "votes_the_third_party": "the third party", "votes_townsend": "townsend", "votes_townsend_non_partisan": "townsend non partisan", "votes_townsend_old_age_pension": "townsend old age pension", "votes_townsend_plan": "townsend plan", "votes_townsend_social_justice": "townsend social justice", "votes_union": "union", "votes_union_progressive": "union progressive", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_victory": "victory", "votes_your_party": "your party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 428, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 428, "cast_gt_registered": 404}, "n_stations_flagged": 428, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:29:03.191339", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.714, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.562, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.471, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 1936, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1936, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.503, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 1936, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.773, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 1936, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1936, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1936, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.02, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 1936, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.562, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 1936, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.471, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.471, "year": 1936, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.293, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.293, "year": 1936, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 1936, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1936, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 1936, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.797, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 1936, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 428}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f093f4156d504f9eb54c0f8938c50455", "name": "United States 1934 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 428)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1934, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1934 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (428 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_vic": "'vic'", "votes_cincinnatus_nonpartisan_movement": "cincinnatus nonpartisan movement", "votes_citizens": "citizens", "votes_city_fusion": "city fusion", "votes_communist": "communist", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_equal_rights": "equal rights", "votes_farmer_labor": "farmer-labor", "votes_honest_elections": "honest elections", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_citizens": "independent citizens", "votes_independent_communist": "independent communist", "votes_law_preservation": "law preservation", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_lincoln_fair_deal": "lincoln fair deal", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_national_progressive": "national progressive", "votes_new_era": "new era", "votes_old_age_pension": "old age pension", "votes_others": "others", "votes_people_s": "people's", "votes_progressive": "progressive", "votes_progressive_democrat": "progressive democrat", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_rich_county_independent": "rich county independent", "votes_roosevelt": "roosevelt", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_veterans": "veterans", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 428, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 428, "cast_gt_registered": 375}, "n_stations_flagged": 428, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:28:58.325155", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.725, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.553, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.464, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.725, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1934, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1934, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 1934, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.447, "year": 1934, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1934, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1934, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.021, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 1934, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.553, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 1934, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 1934, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.289, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 1934, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1934, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1934, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 1934, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.797, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 1934, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 428}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "30522fcc3ce74781a9e5e745619ff9a0", "name": "United States 1932 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 390)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1932, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1932 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (390 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american": "american", "votes_black_and_tan_republican": "black and tan republican", "votes_citizens": "citizens", "votes_civil_sec": "civil sec.", "votes_communist": "communist", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_enf_all": "enf. all", "votes_fair_play": "fair play", "votes_farmer_labor": "farmer-labor", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_communist": "independent communist", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_jeffersonian": "jeffersonian", "votes_jobless": "jobless", "votes_law_preservation": "law preservation", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_liberty": "liberty", "votes_lily_white_republican": "lily-white republican", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_national_party": "national party", "votes_others": "others", "votes_people_s": "people's", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_repeal": "repeal", "votes_roosevelt": "roosevelt", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_sticker": "sticker", "votes_united_dry": "united dry", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 390, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 390, "cast_gt_registered": 366}, "n_stations_flagged": 390, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:28:52.655862", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.717, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.89, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.549, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.461, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.287, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 1932, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 1932, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1932, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1932, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.032, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.508, "year": 1932, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.549, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 1932, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.461, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.461, "year": 1932, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.266, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.266, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 1932, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 1932, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 390}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f6b3876281374ca48273ce0434b1958d", "name": "United States 1930 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 430)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1930, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1930 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (430 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_national": "american national", "votes_communist": "communist", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_farmer_labor": "farmer-labor", "votes_ind_l_sav": "ind. l. sav.", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_citizens_alliance": "independent citizens alliance", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_independent_socialist": "independent socialist", "votes_labor": "labor", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_liberty": "liberty", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_national_party": "national party", "votes_original_democrat": "original democrat", "votes_others": "others", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_repeal_league": "repeal league", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_united": "united", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_volstead_act_republican": "volstead act republican", "votes_workers": "workers"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 430, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 430, "cast_gt_registered": 365}, "n_stations_flagged": 430, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:28:44.667281", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.722, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.891, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.53, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.446, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.722, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 1930, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1930, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.291, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 1930, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.446, "year": 1930, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1930, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1930, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.026, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 1930, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.53, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.53, "year": 1930, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.446, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.446, "year": 1930, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 1930, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1930, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1930, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 1930, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 1930, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 430}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2c752b8b7fac477a80c0e8d02f562b47", "name": "United States 1928 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 430)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1928, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1928 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (430 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_farmer_labor": "farmer-labor", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_independent_voters": "independent voters", "votes_labor": "labor", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_workers": "workers", "votes_workers_communist_party_of_america": "workers (communist) party of america", "votes_workers_party": "workers party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 430, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 378, "registered_not_positive": 430}, "n_stations_flagged": 430, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:28:39.791128", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.668, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.889, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.532, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.445, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.668, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1928, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1928, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.288, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 1928, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.447, "year": 1928, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1928, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1928, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.012, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 1928, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.532, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.532, "year": 1928, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.445, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 1928, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.245, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.245, "year": 1928, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1928, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1928, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.066, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.066, "year": 1928, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 1928, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 430}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a7a836885fb44009a84331a1accdff80", "name": "United States 1926 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 430)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1926, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1926 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (430 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_commonwealth_land_party": "commonwealth land party", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_dry_independent": "dry independent", "votes_farmer_labor": "farmer-labor", "votes_high_life": "high life", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_progressive_republicans": "independent - progressive - republicans", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_la_follette_independent": "la follette independent", "votes_labor": "labor", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_progressive": "progressive", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_radical": "radical", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_t_p_i": "t-p-i", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_workers": "workers", "votes_workers_communist_party_of_america": "workers (communist) party of america"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 430, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 430, "cast_gt_registered": 375}, "n_stations_flagged": 430, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:28:35.713181", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.663, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.89, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.533, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.445, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1926, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1926, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.296, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 1926, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.79, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.448, "year": 1926, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1926, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1926, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.021, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 1926, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.533, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.533, "year": 1926, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.445, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 1926, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 1926, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1926, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1926, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.066, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.066, "year": 1926, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 1926, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 430}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9f9ff818d2444940a7968f0c109b8bf1", "name": "United States 1924 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 430)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1924, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1924 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (430 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american": "american", "votes_commonwealth_land_party": "commonwealth land party", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_farmer_labor": "farmer-labor", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_progressive": "independent progressive", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_independent_wet": "independent wet", "votes_industrialist": "industrialist", "votes_la_follette": "la follette", "votes_la_follette_independent": "la follette independent", "votes_la_follette_progressive": "la follette-progressive", "votes_labor": "labor", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_progressive": "progressive", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_socialist_la_follette": "socialist-la follette", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_war_veteran": "war veteran", "votes_wet_independent": "wet independent", "votes_workers": "workers", "votes_workers_communist_party_of_america": "workers (communist) party of america", "votes_workers_party": "workers party", "votes_workers_party_of_america": "workers party of america"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 430, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 387, "registered_not_positive": 430}, "n_stations_flagged": 430, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:28:31.229703", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.663, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.528, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.443, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1924, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1924, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.288, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 1924, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.447, "year": 1924, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1924, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1924, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.019, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 1924, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.528, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.528, "year": 1924, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.443, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 1924, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.243, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.243, "year": 1924, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1924, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1924, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.077, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.077, "year": 1924, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 1924, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 430}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "46298dbab0c8455baf95b92e859170c5", "name": "United States 1922 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 431)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1922, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1922 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (431 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_consumers_non_partisan": "consumers non partisan", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_farmer_labor": "farmer-labor", "votes_forward": "forward", "votes_inalienable": "inalienable", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_independent_socialist": "independent socialist", "votes_industrial_labor": "industrial labor", "votes_industrialist": "industrialist", "votes_labor": "labor", "votes_lancaster": "lancaster", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_nonpartisan_league": "nonpartisan league", "votes_others": "others", "votes_people_s": "people's", "votes_progressive": "progressive", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_roosevelt": "roosevelt", "votes_single_tax": "single tax", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_union": "union", "votes_united_labor": "united labor", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_voters_league": "voters league", "votes_welfare": "welfare", "votes_workers_party": "workers party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 431, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 399, "registered_not_positive": 431}, "n_stations_flagged": 431, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:28:26.619483", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.668, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.514, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.431, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.668, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.292, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 1922, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 1922, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1922, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1922, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.019, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 1922, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.514, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.514, "year": 1922, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.431, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 1922, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.238, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.238, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1922, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.091, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.091, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 1922, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 431}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "197ecbb5743b4cb59913f412b4248df0", "name": "United States 1920 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 427)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1920, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1920 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (427 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_against_wilson_league": "against wilson league", "votes_american": "american", "votes_american_free_independent": "american free independent", "votes_black_and_tan_republican": "black and tan republican", "votes_citizens": "citizens", "votes_colored_republican": "colored republican", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_enforcement_of_volstead_act": "enforcement of volstead act", "votes_farmer_labor": "farmer-labor", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_non_partisan": "independent non-partisan", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_industrial_labor": "industrial labor", "votes_industrialist": "industrialist", "votes_labor": "labor", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_people_s_candidate_the": "people's candidate, the", "votes_progressive": "progressive", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_single_tax": "single tax", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_white_republican": "white republican"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 427, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 403, "registered_not_positive": 427}, "n_stations_flagged": 427, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:28:22.800316", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.577, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.895, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.51, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.429, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.577, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 1920, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1920, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.271, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 1920, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.461, "year": 1920, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1920, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1920, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.025, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 1920, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.51, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.51, "year": 1920, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.429, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 1920, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.233, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.233, "year": 1920, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 1920, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1920, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.077, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.077, "year": 1920, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 1920, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 427}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "eaf93e49fc4f4c9ab87113fbb023c593", "name": "United States 1918 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 427)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1918, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1918 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (427 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_business_men": "BUSINESS MEN", "votes_citizens": "CITIZENS", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_fair_play": "FAIR PLAY", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_progressive": "INDEPENDENT PROGRESSIVE", "votes_independent_social_democrat": "INDEPENDENT SOCIAL DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_national": "INDEPENDENT-NATIONAL", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_national_party": "NATIONAL PARTY", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_single_tax": "SINGLE TAX", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_t_meet": "T. MEET", "votes_unidentified": "UNIDENTIFIED", "votes_union_labor": "UNION LABOR", "votes_washington": "WASHINGTON"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 427, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 427, "registered_not_positive": 427}, "n_stations_flagged": 427, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:28:18.108180", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.572, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.899, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.403, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.358, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.572, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.394, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 1918, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.757, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 1918, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1918, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1918, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.867, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 1918, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.403, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 1918, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.358, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.358, "year": 1918, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.18, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.18, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.701, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 1918, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.939, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.068, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.068, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 1918, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 427}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ad9db537fc3f4e769d5dc166c4b23322", "name": "United States 1916 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 424)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1916, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1916 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (424 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american": "american", "votes_bull_moose": "bull moose", "votes_colored": "colored", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_progressive": "independent progressive", "votes_industrialist": "industrialist", "votes_keystone": "keystone", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_national_progressive": "national progressive", "votes_others": "others", "votes_personal_liberty": "personal liberty", "votes_progressive": "progressive", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_roosevelt_progressive": "roosevelt progressive", "votes_single_tax": "single tax", "votes_social_democrat": "social democrat", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_union": "union", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_washington": "washington"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 424, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 399, "registered_not_positive": 424}, "n_stations_flagged": 424, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:28:12.617445", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.33, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.751, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.419, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.33, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 1916, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.751, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 1916, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 1916, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.436, "year": 1916, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1916, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1916, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.853, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.463, "year": 1916, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.419, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.419, "year": 1916, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 1916, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.186, "year": 1916, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.725, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.725, "year": 1916, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1916, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.068, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.068, "year": 1916, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.755, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 1916, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 424}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fdfc8e2eff44469faebb5da68e473dae", "name": "United States 1914 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 424)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1914, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1914 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (424 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anti_boss": "anti-boss", "votes_bull_moose": "bull moose", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_elec_prog": "elec. prog.", "votes_independence_league": "independence league", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_prohibition": "independent prohibition", "votes_independent_progressive_socialist": "independent-progressive-socialist", "votes_independent_public_ownership": "independent-public ownership", "votes_industrialist": "industrialist", "votes_keystone": "keystone", "votes_labor": "labor", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_national_progressive": "national progressive", "votes_others": "others", "votes_personal_liberty": "personal liberty", "votes_progressive": "progressive", "votes_progressive_and_businessmen_s": "progressive and businessmen's", "votes_progressive_democrat": "progressive democrat", "votes_progressive_republican": "progressive republican", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_public_ownership": "public ownership", "votes_regular_democrat": "regular democrat", "votes_roosevelt_progressive": "roosevelt progressive", "votes_social_democrat": "social democrat", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_washington": "washington", "votes_wilson_independent": "wilson independent", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 424, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 396, "registered_not_positive": 424}, "n_stations_flagged": 424, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:28:08.064759", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.58, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.898, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.418, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.369, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.58, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 1914, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.898, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1914, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 1914, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.749, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 1914, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1914, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1914, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 1914, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.418, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.418, "year": 1914, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.369, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.369, "year": 1914, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.186, "year": 1914, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.73, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.73, "year": 1914, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1914, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.078, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.078, "year": 1914, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 1914, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 424}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cc0df67a099444faa4d92188cbf307fa", "name": "United States 1912 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 419)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1912, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1912 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (419 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_taft_for_president": "'taft for president'", "votes_bull_moose": "bull moose", "votes_c_w": "c. w.", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independence_league": "independence league", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_industrialist": "industrialist", "votes_jefferson": "jefferson", "votes_keystone": "keystone", "votes_lincoln": "lincoln", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_national_progressive": "national progressive", "votes_others": "others", "votes_progressive": "progressive", "votes_progressive_republican": "progressive republican", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_public_ownership": "public ownership", "votes_roosevelt_progressive": "roosevelt progressive", "votes_social_democrat": "social democrat", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_washington": "washington", "votes_workingmen_s_party_or_league": "workingmen's party or league"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 419, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 388, "registered_not_positive": 419}, "n_stations_flagged": 419, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:28:03.805665", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.564, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.898, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.426, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.373, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 1912, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.898, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1912, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.392, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1912, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.748, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 1912, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1912, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1912, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.465, "year": 1912, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.426, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.426, "year": 1912, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 1912, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.186, "year": 1912, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1912, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1912, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.097, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.097, "year": 1912, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 1912, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 419}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0fb195a03c6c4d9ea4a88dce7e535b55", "name": "United States 1910 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 385)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1910, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1910 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (385 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_civ_a": "'civ. a'", "votes_ind_cong": "'ind. cong.'", "votes_american": "american", "votes_city_party": "city party", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_direct_people_s_candidate": "direct people's candidate", "votes_federated_labor": "federated labor", "votes_independence_league": "independence league", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_industrialist": "industrialist", "votes_keystone": "keystone", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_people_s_labor": "people's labor", "votes_progressive": "progressive", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_public_ownership": "public ownership", "votes_social_democrat": "social democrat", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_union_labor": "union labor", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_william_penn": "william penn", "votes_workingmen_s_party_or_league": "workingmen's party or league"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 385, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 354, "registered_not_positive": 385}, "n_stations_flagged": 385, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:27:59.412125", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.572, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.898, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.421, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.368, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.572, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.898, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.407, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.749, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 1910, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1910, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1910, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.853, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.463, "year": 1910, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.421, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 1910, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.368, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 1910, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.185, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.185, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1910, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.097, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.097, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 1910, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 385}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3fa6030c89024fb0a4dd86bc35077bc9", "name": "United States 1908 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 385)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1908, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1908 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (385 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american": "american", "votes_city_party": "city party", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_direct_nomination": "direct nomination", "votes_free_trade": "free trade", "votes_independence": "independence", "votes_independence_league": "independence league", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_people_s": "people's", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_public_ownership": "public ownership", "votes_scales_of_justice": "scales of justice", "votes_social_democrat": "social democrat", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_taft_republican": "taft republican", "votes_union_labor": "union labor", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 385, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 361, "registered_not_positive": 385}, "n_stations_flagged": 385, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:27:54.995206", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.54, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.897, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.42, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.367, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 1908, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1908, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.183, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 1908, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.747, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 1908, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1908, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1908, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.725, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 1908, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.42, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.42, "year": 1908, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.367, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.367, "year": 1908, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.184, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 1908, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1908, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1908, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.115, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.115, "year": 1908, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 1908, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 385}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5e67a4a51e1e48e89a1786a95163b517", "name": "United States 1906 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 378)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1906, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1906 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (378 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_ind_cong": "'ind. cong.'", "votes_american": "american", "votes_blacksmith": "blacksmith", "votes_bryan_party": "bryan party", "votes_butter_congressional": "butter congressional", "votes_citizens": "citizens", "votes_commonwealth_party": "commonwealth party", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independence_league": "independence league", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_labor": "independent labor", "votes_independent_league": "independent league", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_jefferson": "jefferson", "votes_lincoln": "lincoln", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_people_s": "people's", "votes_populist": "populist", "votes_progressive_alliance": "progressive alliance", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_public_ownership": "public ownership", "votes_reorganized_republican": "reorganized republican", "votes_roosevelt_social_democrat": "roosevelt social democrat", "votes_social_democrat": "social democrat", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_union_labor": "union labor", "votes_united_labor": "united labor", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 378, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 378, "cast_gt_registered": 348}, "n_stations_flagged": 378, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:27:50.827188", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.543, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.9, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.418, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.367, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.543, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.9, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.185, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 1906, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 1906, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1906, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1906, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.432, "year": 1906, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.418, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.418, "year": 1906, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.367, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.367, "year": 1906, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.183, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.183, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1906, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.115, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.115, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 1906, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 378}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "deacb9db62f94a3fa8d6d8af86b2f4ed", "name": "United States 1904 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 378)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1904, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1904 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (378 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american": "american", "votes_citizen_independent": "citizen independent", "votes_citizens": "citizens", "votes_continental": "continental", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_fusion": "fusion", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_labor": "labor", "votes_liberty": "liberty", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_parker_and_davis": "parker and davis", "votes_people_s": "people's", "votes_people_s_and_democrat": "people's and democrat", "votes_populist": "populist", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_pure_politics": "pure politics", "votes_social_democrat": "social democrat", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_stalwart_silver": "stalwart silver", "votes_union": "union", "votes_union_labor": "union labor", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 378, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 365, "registered_not_positive": 378}, "n_stations_flagged": 378, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:27:46.752500", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.542, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.421, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.367, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.542, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 1904, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1904, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.182, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 1904, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.747, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 1904, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1904, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1904, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 1904, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.421, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 1904, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.367, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.367, "year": 1904, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.184, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 1904, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1904, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1904, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.115, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.115, "year": 1904, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 1904, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 378}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d1c5d794e4e14c039c444c28851ad8aa", "name": "United States 1902 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 378)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1902, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1902 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (378 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_allied": "allied", "votes_allied_people_s": "allied people's", "votes_anti_machine": "anti-machine", "votes_anti_monopolist": "anti-monopolist", "votes_ballot_reform": "ballot reform", "votes_citizens": "citizens", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_and_citizen": "democrat and citizen", "votes_fusion": "fusion", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_l_s_l": "l. s. l.", "votes_labor": "labor", "votes_liberty": "liberty", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_people_s": "people's", "votes_populist": "populist", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_regular": "regular", "votes_social_democrat": "social democrat", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_union": "union", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_workingmen_s_party_or_league": "workingmen's party or league"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 378, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 378, "cast_gt_registered": 356}, "n_stations_flagged": 378, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:27:42.692269", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.365, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.911, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.421, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.368, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.365, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 1902, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.911, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 1902, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.12, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 1902, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.874, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1902, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1902, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1902, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.734, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.433, "year": 1902, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.421, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 1902, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.368, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 1902, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.184, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 1902, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.735, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 1902, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1902, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.115, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.115, "year": 1902, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 1902, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 378}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0038d5e3ed3947cc8a8578e3424c3a01", "name": "United States 1900 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 350)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1900, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1900 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (350 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anti_trust_a_t": "anti-trust (a.t.)", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_fusion": "fusion", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_citizens": "independent citizens", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_prohibition": "independent prohibition", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_independent_workers_party": "independent workers party", "votes_liberal_sunday_law": "liberal sunday law", "votes_middle_of_the_road_populist": "middle of the road populist", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_municipal_league_party_m_l": "municipal league party (m.l.)", "votes_others": "others", "votes_people_s": "people's", "votes_populist": "populist", "votes_progressive_people_s": "progressive people's", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_referendum": "referendum", "votes_single_tax": "single tax", "votes_social_democrat": "social democrat", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_union_reform": "union reform", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_workingmen_s_party_or_league": "workingmen's party or league"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 350, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 349, "registered_not_positive": 350}, "n_stations_flagged": 350, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:27:37.863667", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.55, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.896, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.419, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.367, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.55, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.179, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 1900, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.751, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 1900, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1900, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1900, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.725, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 1900, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.419, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.419, "year": 1900, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.367, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.367, "year": 1900, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.184, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1900, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.115, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.115, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.77, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 1900, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 350}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "94cd5b9b392f445aa55fcde2e8e76e96", "name": "United States 1898 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 350)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1898, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1898 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (350 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_butter_congressional": "butter congressional", "votes_chicago_platform_democracy": "chicago platform democracy", "votes_citizens_democrat": "citizens democrat", "votes_colored_republican": "colored republican", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_fusion": "fusion", "votes_honest_government": "honest government", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_populist": "independent populist", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_league_island_development": "league island development", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_loyal_democrat": "loyal democrat", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_people_s": "people's", "votes_people_s_independent": "people's independent", "votes_populist": "populist", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_republican_citizens": "republican citizens", "votes_robinson_citizen_party": "robinson citizen party", "votes_silver_republican": "silver republican", "votes_social_democrat": "social democrat", "votes_social_labor": "social labor", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_union": "union", "votes_union_reform": "union reform", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 350, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 348, "registered_not_positive": 350}, "n_stations_flagged": 350, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:27:33.430015", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.184, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.79, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.413, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.364, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.184, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 1898, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.79, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1898, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.003, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 1898, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.089, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.522, "year": 1898, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1898, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1898, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.725, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 1898, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.413, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 1898, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.364, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.364, "year": 1898, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.184, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 1898, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1898, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1898, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1898, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 1898, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 350}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "45bcc5dcda544e8ea05e797d10596185", "name": "United States 1896 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 350)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1896, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1896 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (350 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_addicks_republican": "addicks republican", "votes_black_and_tan_republican": "black and tan republican", "votes_butler_republican": "butler republican", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_free_silver": "free silver", "votes_fusion": "fusion", "votes_higgins_republican": "higgins republican", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_jeffersonian": "jeffersonian", "votes_lily_white_republican": "lily-white republican", "votes_mc_kinley_citizen": "mc kinley citizen", "votes_mc_kinley_sound_money": "mc kinley sound money", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_national_democrat": "national democrat", "votes_national_party": "national party", "votes_national_populist": "national populist", "votes_national_republican": "national republican", "votes_national_sound_money_democrat": "national sound money democrat", "votes_others": "others", "votes_people_s": "people's", "votes_populist": "populist", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_protectionist": "protectionist", "votes_republican_citizens": "republican citizens", "votes_rob_republican": "rob. republican", "votes_silver_republican": "silver republican", "votes_social_labor": "social labor", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 350, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 350, "cast_gt_registered": 350}, "n_stations_flagged": 350, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:27:28.867682", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.184, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.793, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.395, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.353, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.184, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 1896, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.793, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1896, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.028, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 1896, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.084, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 1896, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1896, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1896, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 1896, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.353, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.353, "year": 1896, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1896, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1896, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1896, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 1896, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 350}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "00223dc60c4f4a64b97c4de3436d6131", "name": "United States 1894 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 349)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1894, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1894 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (349 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_citizen": "american citizen", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_fusion": "fusion", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democracy": "independent democracy", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_populist": "independent populist", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_labor": "labor", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_people_s": "people's", "votes_populist": "populist", "votes_populist_independent": "populist independent", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_social_democrat": "social democrat", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_state_democrat": "state democrat", "votes_straight_democrat": "straight democrat", "votes_straight_people_party": "straight people party", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_workingmen": "workingmen"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 349, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 349, "registered_not_positive": 349}, "n_stations_flagged": 349, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:27:24.756471", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.253, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.795, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.335, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.319, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.253, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 1894, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1894, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.038, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 1894, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.072, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.518, "year": 1894, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1894, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1894, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.335, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 1894, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.319, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.319, "year": 1894, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1894, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1894, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1894, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 1894, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 349}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ce41b234a25846159f3d915497a55e71", "name": "United States 1892 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 348)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1892, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1892 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (348 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_cook_county_reform_league": "cook county reform league", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_industrial_people_s_union": "industrial people's union", "votes_kolbite_populist": "kolbite populist", "votes_lily_white_republican": "lily-white republican", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_negro": "negro", "votes_others": "others", "votes_people_s": "people's", "votes_populist": "populist", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_silver": "silver", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_union_labor": "union labor", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 348, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 348, "cast_gt_registered": 348}, "n_stations_flagged": 348, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:27:19.168415", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.288, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.774, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.329, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.316, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.288, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.572, "year": 1892, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.985, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 1892, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.329, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.329, "year": 1892, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 1892, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1892, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 1892, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 348}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "22573cef65e8428ea34830175a229041", "name": "United States 1890 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 327)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1890, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1890 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (327 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance": "alliance", "votes_county_democrat": "county democrat", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_farmers_alliance": "farmers' alliance", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_industrial": "industrial", "votes_labor": "labor", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_people_s": "people's", "votes_peoples_independent_republican": "peoples independent republican", "votes_populist": "populist", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_reform_democrat": "reform democrat", "votes_socialist_labor": "socialist labor", "votes_union": "union", "votes_union_labor": "union labor", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 327, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 327, "cast_gt_registered": 323}, "n_stations_flagged": 327, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:27:15.628888", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.274, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.78, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.323, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.312, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.274, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 1890, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1890, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.018, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 1890, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.347, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.087, "year": 1890, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1890, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1890, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.323, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.323, "year": 1890, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.312, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.312, "year": 1890, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1890, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1890, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1890, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 1890, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 327}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e394d73559314dda8143b6102676ba29", "name": "United States 1888 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 321)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1888, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1888 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (321 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_1888": "american (1888)", "votes_citizen_and_county_democrat": "citizen and county democrat", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_labor": "labor", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_tammany_democrat": "tammany democrat", "votes_union_labor": "union labor", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 321, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 321, "cast_gt_registered": 319}, "n_stations_flagged": 321, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:27:11.857279", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.406, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.793, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.33, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.316, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.406, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 1888, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.793, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1888, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.018, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 1888, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.367, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.092, "year": 1888, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1888, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1888, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.33, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 1888, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 1888, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 1888, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1888, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1888, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.742, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 1888, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 321}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3ac4f8c0668740418e023535b267a472", "name": "United States 1886 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 321)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1886, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1886 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (321 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_agricultural_wheeler": "agricultural wheeler", "votes_anti_monopoly": "anti monopoly", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_fusion": "fusion", "votes_greenback": "greenback", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_labor": "labor", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_national_party": "national party", "votes_others": "others", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_temperance_reform": "temperance reform", "votes_union_labor": "union labor", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 321, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 315, "registered_not_positive": 321}, "n_stations_flagged": 321, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:27:07.929779", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.272, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.377, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.325, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.314, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.272, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.568, "year": 1886, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.377, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.344, "year": 1886, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.001, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 1886, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.089, "year": 1886, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1886, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1886, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.325, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.325, "year": 1886, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.314, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.314, "year": 1886, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 1886, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1886, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1886, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.742, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 1886, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 321}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "13a8e9ad85114a129c2a86e45f7c367c", "name": "United States 1884 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 321)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1884, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1884 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (321 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_county_democrat": "county democrat", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_fusion": "fusion", "votes_greenback": "greenback", "votes_greenback_labor": "greenback labor", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_labor_reform": "labor reform", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_national_party": "national party", "votes_others": "others", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_tammany_democrat": "tammany democrat", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 321, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 321, "cast_gt_registered": 315}, "n_stations_flagged": 321, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:27:03.641852", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.401, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.782, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.33, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.316, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.401, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.35, "year": 1884, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.043, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 1884, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.33, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 1884, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 1884, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1884, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1884, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 321}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2d86527370cd47baa9dd31c90742845b", "name": "United States 1882 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 317)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1882, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1882 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (317 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anti_monopoly": "anti monopoly", "votes_bolting_greenback": "bolting greenback", "votes_civil_service_reform": "civil service reform", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_free_trade": "free trade", "votes_fusion": "fusion", "votes_greenback": "greenback", "votes_greenback_labor": "greenback labor", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_greenback": "independent greenback", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_labor": "labor", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_readjuster": "readjuster", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_state_credit_democrat": "state credit democrat", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 317, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 316, "registered_not_positive": 317}, "n_stations_flagged": 317, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:26:58.920191", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.269, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.783, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.333, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.318, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.269, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.567, "year": 1882, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1882, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.028, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 1882, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.35, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.087, "year": 1882, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1882, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1882, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.333, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.333, "year": 1882, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.318, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 1882, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1882, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1882, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1882, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1882, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 317}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6a5f0e9613184174b08f182967512a4f", "name": "United States 1880 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 288)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1880, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1880 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (288 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_greenback": "greenback", "votes_greenback_democrat": "greenback democrat", "votes_greenback_labor": "greenback labor", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_low_tax_democrat": "low tax democrat", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_readjuster": "readjuster", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_temperance": "temperance", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 288, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 285, "registered_not_positive": 288}, "n_stations_flagged": 288, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:26:54.218628", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.27, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.792, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.333, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.318, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.27, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.568, "year": 1880, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.792, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1880, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.02, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 1880, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.354, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.088, "year": 1880, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1880, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1880, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.333, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.333, "year": 1880, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.318, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 1880, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1880, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1880, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1880, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1880, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 288}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4c8965d314c4479590bdc0e56cbf15bc", "name": "United States 1878 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 234)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1878, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1878 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (234 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anti_tammany": "anti tammany", "votes_butler_democrat": "butler democrat", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_greenback": "greenback", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_greenback": "independent greenback", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_labor": "labor", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_national_party": "national party", "votes_others": "others", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_tammany_democrat": "tammany democrat", "votes_temperance": "temperance", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 234, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 233, "registered_not_positive": 234}, "n_stations_flagged": 234, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:26:50.964422", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.267, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.786, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.327, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.315, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.267, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.567, "year": 1878, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1878, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.013, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.753, "year": 1878, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.369, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.092, "year": 1878, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1878, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1878, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.327, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.327, "year": 1878, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.315, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.315, "year": 1878, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1878, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1878, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1878, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1878, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 234}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4c864481849a4ef1aa422ba9ead0cd32", "name": "United States 1876 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 228)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1876, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1876 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (228 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_reform": "american reform", "votes_bolting_democrat": "bolting democrat", "votes_colored_republican": "colored republican", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_greenback": "greenback", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_greenback": "independent greenback", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_temperance": "temperance", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 228, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 226, "registered_not_positive": 228}, "n_stations_flagged": 228, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:26:47.642232", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.411, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.788, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.332, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.318, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.353, "year": 1876, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.788, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1876, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.665, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1876, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.354, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.088, "year": 1876, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1876, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1876, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.332, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.332, "year": 1876, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.318, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 1876, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1876, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1876, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1876, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1876, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 228}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2a178fd5caaf4f36a682d0578a8308ab", "name": "United States 1874 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 178)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1874, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1874 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (178 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_colored": "colored", "votes_conservative_old": "conservative (old)", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_greenback": "greenback", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_reform_democrat": "independent reform democrat", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_reform": "reform", "votes_temperance": "temperance", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 178, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 169, "registered_not_positive": 178}, "n_stations_flagged": 178, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:26:44.090478", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.262, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.797, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.334, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.318, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.262, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.566, "year": 1874, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.797, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.334, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.334, "year": 1874, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.318, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 1874, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1874, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1874, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 178}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0fe5fbdf5c1743e88039d16e41a34f70", "name": "United States 1872 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 194)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1872, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1872 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (194 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_apollo_hall": "apollo hall", "votes_brindle_tail_republican": "brindle-tail republican", "votes_conservative_old": "conservative (old)", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_liberal_republican": "liberal republican", "votes_minstrel_republican": "minstrel republican", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_straight_democrat": "straight democrat", "votes_temperance": "temperance", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 194, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 194, "cast_gt_registered": 194}, "n_stations_flagged": 194, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:26:40.767796", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.288, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.781, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.335, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.319, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.288, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.572, "year": 1872, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.672, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.362, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.09, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.335, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 1872, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.319, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.319, "year": 1872, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1872, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1872, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 194}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7a56578162a94a9ba52fa8a123ffcbe1", "name": "United States 1870 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 141)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1870, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1870 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (141 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative_old": "conservative (old)", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_labor_reform": "labor reform", "votes_liberal_republican": "liberal republican", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_prohibition": "prohibition", "votes_temperance": "temperance", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_young_democracy": "young democracy"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 141, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 141, "registered_not_positive": 141}, "n_stations_flagged": 141, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:26:37.654805", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.281, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.787, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.342, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.323, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.281, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 1870, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1870, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.664, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1870, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.336, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.084, "year": 1870, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1870, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1870, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.342, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.342, "year": 1870, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.323, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.323, "year": 1870, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1870, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1870, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1870, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1870, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 141}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "57731ab5776841d596f0eaef8abb87f5", "name": "United States 1868 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 139)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1868, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1868 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (139 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative_old": "conservative (old)", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_republican": "independent republican", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 139, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 139, "cast_gt_registered": 139}, "n_stations_flagged": 139, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:26:34.276143", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.18, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.791, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.338, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.32, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.18, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 1868, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.791, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1868, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.681, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 1868, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.365, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.091, "year": 1868, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1868, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1868, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.338, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.338, "year": 1868, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.32, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.32, "year": 1868, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1868, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1868, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1868, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1868, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 139}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "67b8b0b243054743b1ee1657975b148f", "name": "United States 1866 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 91)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1866, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1866 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (91 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative_old": "conservative (old)", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_national_union": "national union", "votes_others": "others", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_workingmen": "workingmen"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 91, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 85, "registered_not_positive": 91}, "n_stations_flagged": 91, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:26:31.190263", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.162, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.797, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.336, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.32, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.162, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 1866, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.797, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.689, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.368, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.092, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.336, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.336, "year": 1866, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.32, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.32, "year": 1866, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1866, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1866, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 91}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7ac728915d7a458d92078ed32f9d74aa", "name": "United States 1864 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 103)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1864, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1864 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (103 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative_old": "conservative (old)", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_radical_republican": "independent radical republican", "votes_irregular_union": "irregular union", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_mozart_democrat": "mozart democrat", "votes_others": "others", "votes_tammany_democrat": "tammany democrat", "votes_union_civil_war": "union (civil war)", "votes_union_republican": "union republican", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 103, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 103, "registered_not_positive": 103}, "n_stations_flagged": 103, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:26:28.662144", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.174, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.357, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.337, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.301, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.174, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 1864, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.339, "year": 1864, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1864, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.359, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.09, "year": 1864, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1864, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1864, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.337, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.337, "year": 1864, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.301, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.301, "year": 1864, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 1864, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1864, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1864, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1864, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 103}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f6dc1f823a324028abfe47ab683cd28d", "name": "United States 1862 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 85)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1862, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1862 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (85 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_emancipation": "emancipation", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_people_s": "people's", "votes_southern_rights_democrat": "southern rights democrat", "votes_union_civil_war": "union (civil war)", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 85, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 85, "cast_gt_registered": 83}, "n_stations_flagged": 85, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:26:25.416044", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.185, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.792, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.337, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.3, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.185, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 1862, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.792, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1862, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.68, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 1862, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.355, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.089, "year": 1862, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1862, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1862, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.337, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.337, "year": 1862, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.3, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.3, "year": 1862, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 1862, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1862, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1862, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1862, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 85}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "efc23d4bfada41d488e399cde59f7ce6", "name": "United States 1860 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 70)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1860, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1860 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (70 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_breckinridge_democrat": "breckinridge democrat", "votes_constitutional_union": "constitutional union", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_fusion": "fusion", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_union_civil_war": "union (civil war)", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 70, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 70, "registered_not_positive": 70}, "n_stations_flagged": 70, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:26:22.877391", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.18, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.777, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.328, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.296, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.18, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 1860, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.777, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1860, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.656, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 1860, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.354, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.088, "year": 1860, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1860, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1860, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.328, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 1860, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.296, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.296, "year": 1860, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.629, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.629, "year": 1860, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1860, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1860, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1860, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 70}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a8dc0a1a9bfb46c68b904a672bfc0f2d", "name": "United States 1858 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 66)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1858, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1858 (10.0), CONSTITUENCY level (66 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_know_nothing": "american (know nothing)", "votes_anti_lecompton_democrat": "anti-lecompton democrat", "votes_anti_tax": "anti-tax", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_state_s_rights_democrat": "state's rights democrat", "votes_union_civil_war": "union (civil war)", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 66, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 66, "cast_gt_registered": 61}, "n_stations_flagged": 66, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:26:19.501265", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.194, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.793, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.327, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.293, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.194, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 1858, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.793, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.356, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.089, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.327, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.327, "year": 1858, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.293, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.293, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 1858, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1858, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 66}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9f78586515ba468ea1d1a6456f0fb66d", "name": "United States 1856 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 68)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1856, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1856 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (68 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_know_nothing": "american (know nothing)", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_fusion": "fusion", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_american_know_nothing": "independent american (know nothing)", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_unknown": "unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 68, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 68, "cast_gt_registered": 68}, "n_stations_flagged": 68, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:26:15.929150", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.193, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.788, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.327, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.293, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.193, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 1856, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.788, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1856, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.67, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1856, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.354, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.088, "year": 1856, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1856, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1856, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.327, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.327, "year": 1856, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.293, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.293, "year": 1856, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 1856, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1856, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1856, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1856, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 68}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9a3cb629671f45f9af85fab49d60dcd1", "name": "United States 1854 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 64)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1854, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1854 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (64 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_administration_democrat": "administration democrat", "votes_american_know_nothing": "american (know nothing)", "votes_anti_nebraska_democrat": "anti-nebraska democrat", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_free_soil": "free soil", "votes_hard_democrat": "hard democrat", "votes_independent_hard_democrat": "independent hard democrat", "votes_modern_republican": "modern republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_soft_democrat": "soft democrat", "votes_temperance": "temperance", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_whig": "whig"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 64, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 64, "cast_gt_registered": 64}, "n_stations_flagged": 64, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:26:13.134758", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.153, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.783, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.33, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.294, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.153, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 1854, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.679, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.33, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 1854, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.294, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.294, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 1854, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1854, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 64}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0f8129cc5c5948f0b1f6d1ec1ae03944", "name": "United States 1852 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 78)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1852, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1852 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (78 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_free_soil": "free soil", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_whig": "independent whig", "votes_others": "others", "votes_ultra_abolitionist": "ultra abolitionist", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_whig": "whig"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 78, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 78, "cast_gt_registered": 78}, "n_stations_flagged": 78, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:26:09.039267", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.184, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.79, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.331, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.294, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.184, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 1852, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.79, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.66, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.361, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.09, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1852, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.294, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.294, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 1852, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1852, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 78}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a680b8c006bc42fc9336b564cbe9cba2", "name": "United States 1850 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 64)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1850, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1850 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (64 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_abolition": "abolition", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_free_soil": "free soil", "votes_national_reform": "national reform", "votes_others": "others", "votes_temperance": "temperance", "votes_unknown": "unknown", "votes_whig": "whig"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 64, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 64, "cast_gt_registered": 64}, "n_stations_flagged": 64, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:26:04.233898", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.171, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.797, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.33, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.293, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.171, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 1850, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.797, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1850, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.675, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 1850, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.353, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.088, "year": 1850, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1850, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1850, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.33, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 1850, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.293, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.293, "year": 1850, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 1850, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1850, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1850, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1850, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 64}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9a9440cdb07e462e8911b23f2cb63742", "name": "United States 1848 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 61)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1848, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1848 (10.0), CONSTITUENCY level (61 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_know_nothing": "american (know nothing)", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_free_soil": "free soil", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_whig": "independent whig", "votes_others": "others", "votes_taylor_democrat": "taylor democrat", "votes_whig": "whig"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 61, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 57, "registered_not_positive": 61}, "n_stations_flagged": 61, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:26:01.604252", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.178, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.786, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.331, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.294, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.178, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 1848, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1848, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.662, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 1848, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.369, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.092, "year": 1848, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1848, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1848, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1848, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.294, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.294, "year": 1848, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 1848, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1848, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1848, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1848, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 61}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7ea1d3de13184b5db0cba7069e72cbdd", "name": "United States 1846 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 62)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1846, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1846 (10.0), CONSTITUENCY level (62 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_know_nothing": "american (know nothing)", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_liberty": "liberty", "votes_others": "others", "votes_whig": "whig"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 62, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 30, "registered_not_positive": 62}, "n_stations_flagged": 62, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:25:58.524751", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.181, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.794, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.337, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.297, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.181, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 1846, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.794, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1846, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.689, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 1846, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1846, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1846, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1846, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.337, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.337, "year": 1846, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.297, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.297, "year": 1846, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 1846, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1846, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1846, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1846, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 62}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2720e8974d624d638d518cb87e24f002", "name": "United States 1844 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 57)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1844, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1844 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (57 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_know_nothing": "american (know nothing)", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_liberty": "liberty", "votes_others": "others", "votes_whig": "whig"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 57, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 56, "registered_not_positive": 57}, "n_stations_flagged": 57, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:25:55.713448", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.163, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.791, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.342, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.299, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.163, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 1844, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.791, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1844, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.66, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 1844, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.202, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.3, "year": 1844, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1844, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1844, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.342, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.342, "year": 1844, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.299, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.299, "year": 1844, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 1844, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1844, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1844, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1844, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 57}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5b33fb270ff74c4591d30c3c749f3a51", "name": "United States 1843 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 56)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1843, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1843 (8.0), CONSTITUENCY level (56 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_law_and_order_whig": "law and order whig", "votes_liberty": "liberty", "votes_others": "others", "votes_tyler_democrat": "tyler democrat", "votes_whig": "whig"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 56, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 54, "registered_not_positive": 56}, "n_stations_flagged": 56, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:25:52.547555", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.169, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.793, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.343, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.299, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.169, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 1843, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.793, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1843, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.672, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 1843, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.183, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.296, "year": 1843, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1843, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1843, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.343, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.343, "year": 1843, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.299, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.299, "year": 1843, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 1843, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1843, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1843, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1843, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 56}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "470354d7528940ab989571f5df36400f", "name": "United States 1840 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 55)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1840, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1840 (10.0), CONSTITUENCY level (55 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_others": "others", "votes_state_rights_democrat": "state rights democrat", "votes_whig": "whig"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 55, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 45, "registered_not_positive": 55}, "n_stations_flagged": 55, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:25:50.003680", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.176, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.781, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.355, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.306, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.176, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 1840, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1840, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.677, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 1840, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.181, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 1840, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1840, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1840, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.355, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.355, "year": 1840, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.306, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 1840, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 1840, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1840, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1840, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1840, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 55}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a90963874d0842ee814132c3e1ee897f", "name": "United States 1838 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 56)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1838, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1838 (10.0), CONSTITUENCY level (56 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_nullifier": "nullifier", "votes_others": "others", "votes_state_rights_democrat": "state rights democrat", "votes_state_rights_whig": "state rights whig", "votes_union_democrat": "union democrat", "votes_whig": "whig"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 56, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 50, "registered_not_positive": 56}, "n_stations_flagged": 56, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:25:47.838662", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.775, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.796, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.368, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.313, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.775, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1838, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.796, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1838, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.731, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1838, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.197, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.299, "year": 1838, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1838, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1838, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.368, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 1838, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.313, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.313, "year": 1838, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 1838, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1838, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1838, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1838, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 56}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4eb06bb0309242a5927b3e87a5041438", "name": "United States 1836 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 54)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1836, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1836 (10.0), CONSTITUENCY level (54 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_state_rights_democrat": "state rights democrat", "votes_state_rights_whig": "state rights whig", "votes_union_democrat": "union democrat", "votes_whig": "whig"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 54, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 54, "cast_gt_registered": 40}, "n_stations_flagged": 54, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:25:45.130571", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.779, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.792, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.368, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.316, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.779, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1836, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.792, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1836, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.729, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1836, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.175, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.294, "year": 1836, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1836, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1836, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.368, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 1836, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 1836, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.599, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 1836, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1836, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1836, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1836, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 54}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "655e433ed41e46a29f8ee16ee6a83d13", "name": "United States 1834 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 55)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1834, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1834 (10.0), CONSTITUENCY level (55 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anti_mason": "anti-mason", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_others": "others", "votes_state_rights": "state rights", "votes_union": "union", "votes_whig": "whig"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 55, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 55, "cast_gt_registered": 52}, "n_stations_flagged": 55, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:25:42.640466", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.792, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.784, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.367, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.314, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.792, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1834, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1834, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1834, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.189, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.297, "year": 1834, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1834, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1834, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.367, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.367, "year": 1834, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.314, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.314, "year": 1834, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 1834, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1834, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1834, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 1834, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 55}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f374b78344ac4fc496ad052cfc1c59aa", "name": "United States 1833 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 53)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1833, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1833 (8.0), CONSTITUENCY level (53 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_jacksonian": "jacksonian", "votes_national_republican": "national republican", "votes_opposition": "opposition", "votes_others": "others", "votes_state_rights_democrat": "state rights democrat", "votes_union_democrat": "union democrat", "votes_whig": "whig"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 53, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 53, "cast_gt_registered": 37}, "n_stations_flagged": 53, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:25:39.982784", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.789, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.783, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.362, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.312, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.789, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1833, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1833, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1833, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.209, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.302, "year": 1833, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1833, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1833, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.362, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.362, "year": 1833, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.312, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.312, "year": 1833, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 1833, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1833, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1833, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 1833, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 53}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "595b3e98f7fd4f609ee1291078d9ca70", "name": "United States 1830 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 44)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1830, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1830 (10.0), CONSTITUENCY level (44 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anti_mason": "anti-mason", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_jacksonian": "jacksonian", "votes_national_republican": "national republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_state_rights_democrat": "state rights democrat", "votes_state_rights_whig": "state rights whig", "votes_union_democrat": "union democrat"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 44, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 44, "cast_gt_registered": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 44, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:25:37.023663", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.784, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.798, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.358, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.3, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1830, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.798, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1830, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.733, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1830, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.197, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.299, "year": 1830, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1830, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1830, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.358, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.358, "year": 1830, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.3, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.3, "year": 1830, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 1830, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1830, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1830, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 1830, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 44}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "22a0bfc8eb884b018360fdc1a05c933b", "name": "United States 1828 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 44)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1828, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1828 (10.0), CONSTITUENCY level (44 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_adams_republican": "adams republican", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democratic_republican": "democratic republican", "votes_federalist": "federalist", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_jacksonian": "jacksonian", "votes_national_republican": "national republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_state_rights_democrat": "state rights democrat", "votes_state_rights_whig": "state rights whig", "votes_union_democrat": "union democrat"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 44, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 44, "cast_gt_registered": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 44, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:25:34.584379", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.795, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.788, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.353, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.297, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1828, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.788, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1828, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.728, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1828, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.191, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.298, "year": 1828, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1828, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1828, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.353, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.353, "year": 1828, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.297, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.297, "year": 1828, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 1828, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1828, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1828, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 1828, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 44}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "27fe4dbbd0604e3eb3f90840bb338bdd", "name": "United States 1826 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 58)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1826, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1826 (10.0), CONSTITUENCY level (58 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_adams_republican": "adams republican", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democratic_republican": "democratic republican", "votes_federalist": "federalist", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_jacksonian": "jacksonian", "votes_others": "others", "votes_state_rights_democrat": "state rights democrat", "votes_state_rights_free_trader": "state rights free trader", "votes_union_democrat": "union democrat", "votes_unpledged_republican": "unpledged republican"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 58, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 23, "registered_not_positive": 58}, "n_stations_flagged": 58, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:25:31.855204", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.786, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.788, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.346, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.283, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1826, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.788, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1826, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.719, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 1826, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.303, "year": 1826, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1826, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1826, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.346, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.346, "year": 1826, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.283, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.283, "year": 1826, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 1826, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1826, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1826, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 1826, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 58}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9b8e27a8b41243acb239dc7276c49c54", "name": "United States 1824 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 45)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1824, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "United States lower-house election 1824 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (45 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_adams_republican": "adams republican", "votes_democratic_republican": "democratic republican", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_jacksonian": "jacksonian", "votes_others": "others"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 45, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 43, "registered_not_positive": 45}, "n_stations_flagged": 45, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:25:29.517388", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.773, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.398, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.345, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.283, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.773, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 1824, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.398, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.349, "year": 1824, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1824, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.164, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.291, "year": 1824, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1824, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1824, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.345, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.345, "year": 1824, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.283, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.283, "year": 1824, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 1824, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1824, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1824, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 1824, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 45}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c903443e65cf4091beb09edcaefe3128", "name": "Ukraine 2019 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 200)", "metadata": {"country": "Ukraine", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ukraine lower-house election 2019, CONSTITUENCY level (200 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_ukrainian_association_fakel_torc": "All-Ukrainian Association Fakel (Torch)", "votes_all_ukrainian_union_fatherland": "All-Ukrainian Union \"Fatherland\"", "votes_all_ukrainian_union_svoboda": "All-Ukrainian Union \"Svoboda\"", "votes_political_party_act_together": "Political Party \"Act Together\"", "votes_political_party_agrarian_party": "Political Party \"Agrarian Party\"", "votes_political_party_bila_tserkva_togethe": "Political Party \"Bila Tserkva Together\"", "votes_political_party_civil_movement": "Political Party \"Civil Movement\"", "votes_political_party_civil_position": "Political Party \"Civil Position\"", "votes_political_party_democratic_axis": "Political Party \"Democratic Axis\"", "votes_political_party_european_solidarity": "Political Party \"European Solidarity\"", "votes_political_party_independence": "Political Party \"Independence\"", "votes_political_party_movement_of_new_forc": "Political Party \"Movement of New Forces of Mikheil Saakashvili\"", "votes_political_party_opposition_bloc": "Political Party \"Opposition Bloc\"", "votes_political_party_opposition_platform_": "Political Party \"Opposition Platform \u2014 For Life\"", "votes_political_party_party_of_greens_of_u": "Political Party \"Party of Greens of Ukraine\"", "votes_political_party_party_of_shariy": "Political Party \"Party of Shariy\"", "votes_political_party_patriot": "Political Party \"Patriot\"", "votes_political_party_people_s_movement_of": "Political Party \"People's Movement of Ukraine\"", "votes_political_party_power_and_honor": "Political Party \"Power and Honor\"", "votes_political_party_power_of_law": "Political Party \"Power of Law\"", "votes_political_party_power_of_people": "Political Party \"Power of People\"", "votes_political_party_radical_party_of_ole": "Political Party \"Radical Party of Oleh Lyashko\"", "votes_political_party_samopomich": "Political Party \"Samopomich\"", "votes_political_party_servant_of_the_peopl": "Political Party \"Servant of the People\"", "votes_political_party_social_justice": "Political Party \"Social Justice\"", "votes_political_party_udar_ukrainian_democ": "Political Party \"UDAR (Ukrainian Democratic Alliance for Reforms) Vitaliy Klitschko\"", "votes_political_party_ukrainian_strategy_o": "Political Party \"Ukrainian Strategy of Groisman\"", "votes_political_party_united_center": "Political Party \"United Center\"", "votes_political_party_voice": "Political Party \"Voice\"", "votes_self_nomination": "self nomination", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 200, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 200, "registered_not_positive": 200}, "n_stations_flagged": 200, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:25:26.589748", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.505, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.73, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.528, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.318, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.505, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.206, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.332, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.583, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.675, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.528, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.528, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.318, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.366, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.366, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.292, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 200}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a83a3b11d7df45a8ae0c1dddf44e4540", "name": "Ukraine 2014 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 226)", "metadata": {"country": "Ukraine", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ukraine lower-house election 2014, CONSTITUENCY level (226 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_ukrainian_union_batkivshchyna": "All-Ukrainian Union \"Batkivshchyna\"", "votes_communist_party_of_ukraine": "Communist Party of Ukraine", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_liberal_party_of_ukraine_renew": "Liberal Party of Ukraine (renew)", "votes_partiia_hromadska_syla": "Partiia \"Hromadska syla\"", "votes_partiia_solidarnist_zhinok_ukrainy": "Partiia \"Solidarnist zhinok Ukrainy\"", "votes_partiia_sylna_ukraina": "Partiia \"Sylna Ukraina\"", "votes_partiia_vidrodzhennya": "Partiia \"Vidrodzhennya\"", "votes_partiia_zelenykh_ukrainy": "Partiia Zelenykh Ukrainy", "votes_party_blok_petro_poroshenko": "Party \"Blok Petro Poroshenko\"", "votes_political_party_5_10": "Political Party \"5.10\"", "votes_political_party_blok_livykh_syl_ukra": "Political Party \"Blok Livykh Syl Ukrayiny\"", "votes_political_party_vseukrayins_ke_ahrar": "Political Party \"Vseukrayins'Ke Ahrarne Ob'Yednannya 'Zastup'\"", "votes_political_party_vseukrayins_ke_polit": "Political Party Vseukrayins'Ke Politychne Ob'Yednannya \"Ukrayina - Yedyna Krayina\"", "votes_political_party_narodnyy_front": "Political party \"Narodnyy Front\"", "votes_political_party_opozytsiynyy_blok": "Political party \"Opozytsiynyy blok\"", "votes_political_party_pravyy_sektor": "Political party \"Pravyy Sektor\"", "votes_political_party_syla_lyudey": "Political party \"Syla Lyudey\"", "votes_political_party_samopomich_union": "Political party Samopomich Union", "votes_politychna_partiia_konhres_ukrainsky": "Politychna Partiia Konhres Ukrainskykh Natsionalistiv", "votes_politychna_partiia_demokratychnyi_al": "Politychna partiia \"Demokratychnyi alians\"", "votes_politychna_partiia_hromadianska_pozy": "Politychna partiia \"Hromadianska pozytsiia\"", "votes_politychna_partiia_internet_partiia_": "Politychna partiia \"Internet partiia Ukrainy\"", "votes_politychna_partiia_nova_polityka": "Politychna partiia \"Nova Polityka\"", "votes_politychna_partiia_yedyna_kraina": "Politychna partiia \"Yedyna Kraina\"", "votes_politychna_partiia_ukrainska_platfor": "Politychna partiia Ukrainska platforma \"SOBOR\"", "votes_radical_party_of_oleh_liashko": "Radical Party of Oleh Liashko", "votes_svoboda_party": "SVOBODA Party", "votes_ukrainska_respublikanska_partiia": "Ukrainska Respublikanska Partiia", "votes_ukrainska_partiia_zelena_planeta": "Ukrainska partiia \"Zelena planeta\"", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 226, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 199, "registered_not_positive": 226}, "n_stations_flagged": 226, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:25:23.117337", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.301, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.985, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.417, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.215, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.301, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.575, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.985, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.451, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.723, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.417, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.417, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.215, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.215, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.293, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.293, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.149, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.149, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 226}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "707d865a5e8044fcaea2ad1390d89b6b", "name": "Ukraine 2012 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 226)", "metadata": {"country": "Ukraine", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ukraine lower-house election 2012, CONSTITUENCY level (226 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_agrarian_party_of_ukraine": "Agrarian Party of Ukraine", "votes_all_ukrainian_union_batkivshchyna": "All-Ukrainian Union \"Batkivshchyna\"", "votes_communist_party_of_ukraine": "Communist Party of Ukraine", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_kmks_partiia_uhortsiv_ukrainy": "KMKS -- Partiia uhortsiv Ukrainy", "votes_liberal_party_of_ukraine_renew": "Liberal Party of Ukraine (renew)", "votes_narodna_partiia": "Narodna Partiia", "votes_partiia_natalii_korolevskoi_ukraina_": "Partiia Natalii Korolevskoi \"Ukraina \u2013 Vpered!\"", "votes_partiia_pensioneriv_ukrainy": "Partiia Pensioneriv Ukrainy", "votes_partiia_politychne_obiednannia_ridna": "Partiia Politychne Obiednannia \"Ridna Vitchyzna\"", "votes_partiia_zelenykh_ukrainy": "Partiia Zelenykh Ukrainy", "votes_party_russkiy_blok": "Party \"Russkiy blok\"", "votes_party_soyuz": "Party \"Soyuz\"", "votes_party_of_regions": "Party of Regions", "votes_political_party_ukraina_maibutnyogo": "Political Party \"Ukraina Maibutnyogo\"", "votes_politychna_partiia_konhres_ukrainsky": "Politychna Partiia Konhres Ukrainskykh Natsionalistiv", "votes_politychna_partiia_yedynyi_tsentr": "Politychna Partiia Yedynyi Tsentr", "votes_politychna_partiia_narodna_initsiaty": "Politychna partiia \"Narodna initsiatyva\"", "votes_politychna_partiia_narodno_trudovyi_": "Politychna partiia \"Narodno-trudovyi soiuz Ukrainy\"", "votes_politychna_partiia_nasha_ukraina": "Politychna partiia \"Nasha Ukraina\"", "votes_politychna_partiia_nova_polityka": "Politychna partiia \"Nova Polityka\"", "votes_politychna_partiia_ukrainska_platfor": "Politychna partiia Ukrainska platforma \"SOBOR\"", "votes_politychna_partiia_vseukrainske_obie": "Politychna partiia Vseukrainske obiednannia \"Hromada\"", "votes_radical_party_of_oleh_liashko": "Radical Party of Oleh Liashko", "votes_svoboda_party": "SVOBODA Party", "votes_socialist_party_of_ukraine": "Socialist Party of Ukraine", "votes_the_party_united_left_and_peasants": "The Party \"United Left and Peasants\"", "votes_udar_ukrainian_democratic_alliance_f": "UDAR (Ukrainian Democratic Alliance for Reforms) of Vitaliy Klychko", "votes_ukrainian_national_assembly": "Ukrainian National Assembly", "votes_ukrainska_partiia_zelena_planeta": "Ukrainska partiia \"Zelena planeta\"", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 226, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 226, "registered_not_positive": 226}, "n_stations_flagged": 226, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:25:19.093985", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.471, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.855, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.479, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.26, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.471, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.475, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.321, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.19, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.206, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.301, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.26, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.26, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.328, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.203, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.203, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 226}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f8e06af592384d6c988316bd35efeb4b", "name": "Ukraine 2002 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 226)", "metadata": {"country": "Ukraine", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ukraine lower-house election 2002, CONSTITUENCY level (226 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_ukrainian_labor_party": "All-Ukrainian Labor Party", "votes_all_ukrainian_party_new_power": "All-Ukrainian Party \"New Power\"", "votes_all_ukrainian_political_union_women_": "All-Ukrainian Political Union -- Women for the Future", "votes_communist_party_of_ukraine": "Communist Party of Ukraine", "votes_communist_party_of_ukraine_renewed": "Communist Party of Ukraine (renewed)\u00a0", "votes_communist_party_of_workers_and_peasa": "Communist Party of Workers and Peasants", "votes_election_bloc_of_political_parties_d": "Election bloc of Political Parties \"Democratic Party of Ukraine \u2013 Party \"Democratic Union\"\"", "votes_election_bloc_of_political_parties_f": "Election bloc of Political Parties \"For One Ukraine!\"", "votes_election_bloc_of_political_parties_n": "Election bloc of Political Parties \"Nataliya Vitrenko Bloc\"", "votes_election_bloc_of_political_parties_p": "Election bloc of Political Parties \"People's Movement of Ukraine\"", "votes_election_bloc_of_political_parties_r": "Election bloc of Political Parties \"Ruses bloc\"", "votes_election_bloc_of_political_parties_t": "Election bloc of Political Parties \"Team of Winter Generation\"", "votes_election_bloc_of_political_parties_u": "Election bloc of Political Parties \"Unity\"", "votes_election_bloc_of_political_parties_v": "Election bloc of Political Parties \"Victor Yushchenko Bloc 'Our Ukraine'\"", "votes_election_bloc_of_political_parties_y": "Election bloc of Political Parties \"Yuliya Tymoshenko election bloc\"", "votes_election_bloc_of_political_parties_z": "Election bloc of Political Parties \"ZUBR\"", "votes_election_bloc_of_political_2": "Election bloc of political Parties \"Nataliya Vitrenko Bloc\"", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_none_of_these_candidates": "None of these candidates", "votes_party_new_generation_of_ukraine": "Party \"New Generation of Ukraine\"", "votes_party_of_all_ukrainian_union_of_the_": "Party of All-Ukrainian union of the left \"Justice\"", "votes_party_of_greens_of_ukraine": "Party of Greens of Ukraine", "votes_party_of_rehabilitation_of_invalids_": "Party of Rehabilitation of Invalids of Ukraine", "votes_peasant_party": "Peasant Party", "votes_political_party_all_ukrainian_union_": "Political Party \"All-Ukrainian Union of Christians\"", "votes_political_party_apple": "Political Party \"Apple\"", "votes_social_democratic_party_of_ukraine": "Social Democratic Party of Ukraine", "votes_social_democratic_party_of_ukraine_u": "Social Democratic Party of Ukraine (United)", "votes_socialist_party_of_ukraine": "Socialist Party of Ukraine", "votes_ukrainska_morska_partiia": "Ukrainska Morska Partiia", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 226, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 226, "cast_gt_registered": 226}, "n_stations_flagged": 226, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:25:14.750047", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.086, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.387, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.394, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.245, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.086, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.387, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.595, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.349, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.426, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.356, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.429, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.234, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.245, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.245, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.284, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.284, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.73, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.73, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.295, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.566, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.566, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 226}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3057a28b12e5406ea40cf37ed5035c0f", "name": "Ukraine 1998 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 226)", "metadata": {"country": "Ukraine", "year": 1998, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ukraine lower-house election 1998, CONSTITUENCY level (226 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_agrarian_party_of_ukraine": "Agrarian Party of Ukraine", "votes_all_ukrainian_labor_party": "All-Ukrainian Labor Party", "votes_all_ukrainian_party_of_women_s_initi": "All-Ukrainian Party of Women's Initiatives", "votes_christian_democratic_party_of_ukrain": "Christian Democratic Party of Ukraine\u00a0", "votes_communist_party_of_ukraine": "Communist Party of Ukraine", "votes_election_bloc_democratic_parties_blo": "Election Bloc \"Democratic Parties Bloc\"", "votes_electoral_bloc_of_the_party_of_labou": "Electoral Bloc of the Party of Labour and the Liberal Party\u00a0", "votes_fewer_words_electoral_bloc": "Fewer Words Electoral Bloc\u00a0", "votes_forward_ukraine": "Forward Ukraine!\u00a0", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_narodno_demokratychna_partiia": "Narodno-demokratychna partiia", "votes_national_front_electoral_bloc": "National Front Electoral Bloc\u00a0", "votes_none_of_these_candidates": "None of these candidates", "votes_party_soyuz": "Party \"Soyuz\"", "votes_party_of_defenders_of_the_fatherland": "Party of Defenders of the Fatherland", "votes_party_of_greens_of_ukraine": "Party of Greens of Ukraine\u00a0", "votes_party_of_national_economic_developme": "Party of National Economic Development of Ukraine\u00a0", "votes_party_of_regions": "Party of Regions", "votes_people_s_movement_of_ukraine": "People\u2019s Movement of Ukraine\u00a0", "votes_politychna_partiia_vseukrainske_obie": "Politychna partiia Vseukrainske obiednannia \"Hromada\"", "votes_progressive_socialist_party_of_ukrai": "Progressive Socialist Party of Ukraine", "votes_reforms_and_order_party": "Reforms and Order Party", "votes_republican_christian_party": "Republican Christian Party", "votes_social_democratic_party_of_ukraine_u": "Social Democratic Party of Ukraine (United)", "votes_social_democratic_party_of_ukraine": "Social Democratic Party of Ukraine\u00a0", "votes_social_liberal_union_electoral_bloc": "Social Liberal Union Electoral Bloc", "votes_socialist_party_of_ukraine": "Socialist Party of Ukraine", "votes_socialist_party_of_ukraine_peasant_p": "Socialist Party of Ukraine-Peasant Party of Ukraine\u00a0", "votes_ukrainian_national_assembly": "Ukrainian National Assembly", "votes_working_ukraine_electoral_bloc": "Working Ukraine Electoral Bloc\u00a0", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 226, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 226, "registered_not_positive": 226}, "n_stations_flagged": 226, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:25:11.481890", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.087, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.554, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.448, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.257, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.087, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.522, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.554, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.718, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.505, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.376, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.527, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.382, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.045, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.234, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.448, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.448, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.257, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.257, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.345, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.345, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.296, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.296, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.697, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.697, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Accord", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "KPU", "margin": 18.92, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "UKR", "year": 1999, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 226}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "444ee4dd5f2847b1bd1b06835f5c52c7", "name": "Uganda 2021 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 498)", "metadata": {"country": "Uganda", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Uganda lower-house election 2021, CONSTITUENCY level (498 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_for_national_transformation": "Alliance for National Transformation", "votes_congress_service_volunteers_organisa": "Congress Service Volunteers Organisation", "votes_conservative_party": "Conservative Party", "votes_democratic_party": "Democratic Party", "votes_ecological_party_of_uganda": "Ecological Party of Uganda", "votes_forum_for_democratic_change": "Forum for Democratic Change", "votes_forum_for_integrity_in_leadership": "Forum for Integrity in Leadership", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_justice_forum": "Justice Forum", "votes_national_resistance_movement": "National Resistance Movement", "votes_national_unity_platform": "National Unity Platform", "votes_people_s_progressive_party": "People's Progressive Party", "votes_uganda_economic_party": "Uganda Economic Party", "votes_uganda_people_s_congress": "Uganda People's Congress"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 498, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 483, "registered_not_positive": 498}, "n_stations_flagged": 498, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:25:05.925330", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.207, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.793, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.274, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.18, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.302, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.793, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.448, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.447, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.519, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.13, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.007, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.252, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.182, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.366, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.342, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.274, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.274, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.18, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.18, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.153, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.153, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.413, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.27, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.27, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.495, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.495, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 498}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "661ab6a7cfe241a1a85da4f0b07a9064", "name": "Uganda 2016 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 409)", "metadata": {"country": "Uganda", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Uganda lower-house election 2016, CONSTITUENCY level (409 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_activist_party": "Activist Party", "votes_conservative_party": "Conservative Party", "votes_democratic_party": "Democratic Party", "votes_forum_for_democratic_change": "Forum for Democratic Change", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_justice_forum": "Justice Forum", "votes_national_resistance_movement": "National Resistance Movement", "votes_people_s_progressive_party": "People's Progressive Party", "votes_republican_women_and_youth_party": "Republican Women and Youth Party", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party", "votes_uganda_patriotic_movement": "Uganda Patriotic Movement", "votes_ugandan_federal_alliance": "Ugandan Federal Alliance", "votes_ugandan_people_s_congress": "Ugandan People's Congress", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 409, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 88, "registered_not_positive": 120}, "n_stations_flagged": 121, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:25:01.040572", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.059, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.76, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.289, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.205, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.059, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.265, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.509, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.377, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.135, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.211, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.217, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.448, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.362, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.289, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.205, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.181, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.181, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.468, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.468, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.337, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.337, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.568, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.568, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 409}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "74fd019e12684c518008758597a3ad64", "name": "Uganda 2011 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 348)", "metadata": {"country": "Uganda", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Uganda lower-house election 2011, CONSTITUENCY level (348 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative_party": "Conservative Party", "votes_democratic_party": "Democratic Party", "votes_forum_for_democratic_change": "Forum for Democratic Change", "votes_forum_for_integrity_in_leadership": "Forum for Integrity in Leadership", "votes_green_partisan_party": "Green Partisan Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_justice_forum": "Justice Forum", "votes_liberal_democratic_transparency": "Liberal Democratic Transparency", "votes_national_resistance_movement": "National Resistance Movement", "votes_people_s_development_party": "People's Development Party", "votes_people_s_progressive_party": "People's Progressive Party", "votes_popular_people_s_democracy": "Popular People's Democracy", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party", "votes_uganda_economic_party": "Uganda Economic Party", "votes_ugandan_federal_alliance": "Ugandan Federal Alliance", "votes_ugandan_people_s_congress": "Ugandan People's Congress"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 348, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 101, "registered_not_positive": 112}, "n_stations_flagged": 112, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:24:56.788504", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.378, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.682, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.317, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.233, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.378, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.344, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.42, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.475, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.369, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.208, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.01, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.253, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.284, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.473, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.317, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.317, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.233, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.233, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.21, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.21, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.528, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.528, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.348, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.348, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.649, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "NRM", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "FDC", "margin": 44.02, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "UGA", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 348}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "69b69484e7ff4e7b8c167dc0f868e221", "name": "Uganda 2006 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 295)", "metadata": {"country": "Uganda", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Uganda lower-house election 2006, CONSTITUENCY level (295 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative_party": "Conservative Party", "votes_democratic_party": "Democratic Party", "votes_forum_for_democratic_change": "Forum for Democratic Change", "votes_forum_for_integrity_in_leadership": "Forum for Integrity in Leadership", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_justice_forum": "Justice Forum", "votes_national_resistance_movement": "National Resistance Movement", "votes_ugandan_people_s_congress": "Ugandan People's Congress", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 295, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 80}, "n_stations_flagged": 80, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:24:52.380263", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.247, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.508, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.318, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.243, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.247, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.312, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.508, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.377, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.361, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.34, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.088, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.272, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.326, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.332, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.431, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.358, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.318, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.243, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.243, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.213, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.213, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.367, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.367, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.787, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "NRM", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "FDC", "margin": 21.87, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "UGA", "year": 2006, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 295}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b919ca741bb64535ae1134dee4f54e6f", "name": "US 2012 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 2012, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_constitution": "american constitution", "votes_blank": "blank", "votes_blank_scattering": "blank/scattering", "votes_blank_void_scattering": "blank/void/scattering", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_constitution": "constitution", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_working_families": "democrat, working families", "votes_democratic_farmer_labor": "democratic-farmer-labor", "votes_democratic_nonpartisan_league": "democratic-nonpartisan league", "votes_green": "green", "votes_independence": "independence", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_american": "independent american", "votes_independent_green": "independent green", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_no_party": "no party", "votes_no_party_affiliation": "no party affiliation", "votes_no_party_preference": "no party preference", "votes_nominated_by_petition": "nominated by petition", "votes_pacific_green": "pacific green", "votes_progressive_libertarian_pacific_gree": "progressive, libertarian, pacific green", "votes_reform": "reform", "votes_republican": "republican", "votes_republican_tax_revolt": "republican, tax revolt", "votes_u_s_taxpayers": "u.s. taxpayers", "votes_unaffiliated": "unaffiliated", "votes_working_families": "working families", "votes_write_in": "write-in", "votes_write_in_democrat": "write-in (democrat)", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 435, "cast_gt_registered": 433}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:24:47.919160", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.78, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.889, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.842, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.984, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.996, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.734, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.715, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.22, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.053, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.053, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Republican", "margin": 23.42, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0bcb3357c7804ddc85094a029c48b982", "name": "US 2010 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 2010, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_constitution": "american constitution", "votes_american_independent": "american independent", "votes_blank_scattering": "blank/scattering", "votes_by_petition": "by petition", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_constitution": "constitution", "votes_constitution_party_of_alabama": "constitution party of alabama", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democratic_working_families": "democratic, working families", "votes_democratic_farmer_labor": "democratic-farmer-labor", "votes_green": "green", "votes_independence": "independence", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_american": "independent american", "votes_independent_green": "independent green", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_no_party": "no party", "votes_no_party_affiliation": "no party affiliation", "votes_nominated_by_petition": "nominated by petition", "votes_pacific_green_progressive": "pacific green progressive", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "peace and freedom", "votes_reform": "reform", "votes_republican": "republican", "votes_taxpayers": "taxpayers", "votes_tea_party": "tea party", "votes_towne_for_congress": "towne for congress", "votes_u_s_taxpayers": "u.s. taxpayers", "votes_unaffiliated": "unaffiliated", "votes_working_families": "working families", "votes_write_in": "write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 435, "cast_gt_registered": 432}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:24:41.644102", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.696, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.89, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.9, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.848, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.696, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.984, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.996, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.715, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.291, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.054, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.054, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.965, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f04fd316e371436daf77f58d7e2f7e8b", "name": "US 2008 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 2008, CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alaskan_independence": "Alaskan Independence", "votes_all_others": "All Others", "votes_american_constitution_party": "American Constitution Party", "votes_blank": "Blank", "votes_blank_scattering": "Blank/Scattering", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_constitution": "Constitution", "votes_democrat": "Democrat", "votes_democratic_farmer_labor": "Democratic-Farmer-Labor", "votes_energy_independence": "Energy Independence", "votes_green": "Green", "votes_green_populist": "Green Populist", "votes_hsing_for_congress": "Hsing for Congress", "votes_independence": "Independence", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_american": "Independent American", "votes_independent_green": "Independent Green", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian", "votes_miscellaneous": "Miscellaneous", "votes_no_party_affiliation": "No Party Affiliation", "votes_other": "Other", "votes_pacific_green": "Pacific Green", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "Peace and Freedom", "votes_progressive": "Progressive", "votes_reform": "Reform", "votes_republican": "Republican", "votes_u_s_taxpayers_party": "U.S. Taxpayers Party", "votes_working_families": "Working Families", "votes_write_in": "Write-In", "votes_write_in_2": "Write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 435, "cast_gt_registered": 430}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:24:37.098711", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.776, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.88, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.9, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.845, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.776, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.983, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.996, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.715, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.579, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Republican", "margin": 35.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c1e03616f8db4966b768fe50422e566d", "name": "US 1848 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 98)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1848, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1848 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (98 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_abolition": "abolition", "votes_american_know_nothing": "american (know nothing)", "votes_anti_rent": "anti-rent", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_free_soil": "free soil", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_others": "others", "votes_taylor_democrat": "taylor democrat", "votes_whig": "whig"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 98, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 98, "cast_gt_registered": 89}, "n_stations_flagged": 98, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:24:33.626359", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.178, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.786, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.331, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.294, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.178, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 1848, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1848, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.662, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 1848, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.369, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.092, "year": 1848, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1848, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1848, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1848, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.294, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.294, "year": 1848, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 1848, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1848, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1848, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1848, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 98}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d5f71a25dea9422c8bced298e4fe7010", "name": "US 1846 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 98)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1846, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1846 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (98 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_know_nothing": "american (know nothing)", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democrat_hanker": "democrat-hanker", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_democrat": "independent democrat", "votes_independent_whig": "independent whig", "votes_liberty": "liberty", "votes_opposition_democrat": "opposition democrat", "votes_others": "others", "votes_whig": "whig"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 98, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 98, "cast_gt_registered": 60}, "n_stations_flagged": 98, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:24:30.413517", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.181, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.794, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.337, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.297, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.181, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 1846, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.794, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1846, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.689, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 1846, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1846, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1846, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1846, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.337, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.337, "year": 1846, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.297, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.297, "year": 1846, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 1846, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1846, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1846, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1846, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 98}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "769e8755918f40df9a800b7996a05117", "name": "US 1840 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 83)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1840, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1840 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (83 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_liberty": "liberty", "votes_others": "others", "votes_state_rights_democrat": "state rights democrat", "votes_whig": "whig"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 83, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 77, "registered_not_positive": 83}, "n_stations_flagged": 83, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:24:27.314921", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.176, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.781, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.355, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.306, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.176, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 1840, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1840, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.677, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 1840, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.181, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 1840, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1840, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1840, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.355, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.355, "year": 1840, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.306, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 1840, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 1840, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1840, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1840, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1840, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 83}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3333f79f68d24136aaaa8754867bc785", "name": "US 1836 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 79)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1836, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1836 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (79 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_others": "others", "votes_state_rights_democrat": "state rights democrat", "votes_state_rights_whig": "state rights whig", "votes_union_democrat": "union democrat", "votes_whig": "whig"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 79, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 59, "registered_not_positive": 79}, "n_stations_flagged": 79, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:24:24.449371", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.779, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.792, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.368, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.316, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.779, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1836, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.792, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1836, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.729, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1836, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.175, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.294, "year": 1836, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1836, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1836, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.368, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 1836, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 1836, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.599, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 1836, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1836, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1836, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1836, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 79}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8e3391d494894e1c96e6dcd090e7b9de", "name": "US 1833 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 71)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1833, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1833 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (71 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anti_mason": "anti-mason", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_national_republican": "national republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_state_rights": "state rights", "votes_state_rights_democrat": "state rights democrat", "votes_state_rights_whig": "state rights whig", "votes_union": "union", "votes_whig": "whig"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 71, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 35, "registered_not_positive": 71}, "n_stations_flagged": 71, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:24:22.116394", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.789, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.783, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.362, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.312, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.789, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1833, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1833, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1833, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.209, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.302, "year": 1833, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1833, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1833, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.362, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.362, "year": 1833, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.312, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.312, "year": 1833, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 1833, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1833, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1833, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 1833, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 71}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f5911f732a01474499be94276ede0e59", "name": "US 1830 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 74)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1830, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1830 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (74 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anti_mason": "anti-mason", "votes_clay_republican": "clay republican", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_jacksonian": "jacksonian", "votes_national_republican": "national republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_state_rights_democrat": "state rights democrat", "votes_state_rights_whig": "state rights whig", "votes_union_democrat": "union democrat", "votes_whig": "whig"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 74, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 74, "cast_gt_registered": 50}, "n_stations_flagged": 74, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:24:19.013639", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.784, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.798, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.358, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.3, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1830, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.798, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1830, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.733, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1830, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.197, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.299, "year": 1830, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1830, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1830, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.358, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.358, "year": 1830, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.3, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.3, "year": 1830, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 1830, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1830, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1830, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 1830, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 74}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d3b70e28e4e246b8b51f1a11ff5a362a", "name": "US 1828 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 64)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1828, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1828 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (64 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_adams_republican": "adams republican", "votes_anti_mason": "anti-mason", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_jacksonian": "jacksonian", "votes_national_republican": "national republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_state_rights_democrat": "state rights democrat", "votes_state_rights_whig": "state rights whig", "votes_union_democrat": "union democrat", "votes_whig": "whig"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 64, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 64, "cast_gt_registered": 35}, "n_stations_flagged": 64, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:24:15.885507", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.795, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.788, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.353, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.297, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1828, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.788, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1828, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.728, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1828, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.191, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.298, "year": 1828, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1828, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1828, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.353, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.353, "year": 1828, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.297, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.297, "year": 1828, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 1828, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1828, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1828, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 1828, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 64}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "70dbc8da795844d4afe2cea760cdb05a", "name": "US 1826 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 91)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1826, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1826 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (91 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_adams_republican": "adams republican", "votes_anti_federalist": "anti-federalist", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democratic_republican": "democratic republican", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_jacksonian": "jacksonian", "votes_national_republican": "national republican", "votes_others": "others", "votes_state_rights_democrat": "state rights democrat", "votes_state_rights_free_trader": "state rights free trader", "votes_union_democrat": "union democrat", "votes_whig": "whig"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 91, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 91, "cast_gt_registered": 68}, "n_stations_flagged": 91, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:24:13.015626", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.786, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.788, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.346, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.283, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1826, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.788, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1826, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.719, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 1826, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.303, "year": 1826, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1826, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1826, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.346, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.346, "year": 1826, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.283, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.283, "year": 1826, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 1826, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1826, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1826, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 1826, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 91}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9e17a0f628084c89a81f1e0ac502457d", "name": "US 1824 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 92)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1824, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1824 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (92 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_adams_republican": "adams republican", "votes_democrat": "democrat", "votes_democratic_republican": "democratic republican", "votes_federalist": "federalist", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_jacksonian": "jacksonian", "votes_others": "others", "votes_state_rights_free_trader": "state rights free trader", "votes_whig": "whig"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 92, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 92, "cast_gt_registered": 59}, "n_stations_flagged": 92, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:24:09.991070", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.773, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.398, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.345, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.283, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.773, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 1824, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.398, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.349, "year": 1824, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1824, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.164, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.291, "year": 1824, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1824, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1824, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.345, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.345, "year": 1824, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.283, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.283, "year": 1824, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 1824, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1824, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1824, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 1824, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 92}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ef0d184b8a7743f882cbd7e56495649f", "name": "UK 2024 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 650)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 2024, CONSTITUENCY level (650 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alba_party": "Alba Party", "votes_alliance": "Alliance", "votes_aont": "Aont\u00fa", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_democratic_unionist_party": "Democratic Unionist Party", "votes_green": "Green", "votes_green_party_northern_ireland": "Green Party Northern Ireland", "votes_heritage_party": "Heritage Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_network": "Independent Network", "votes_labour": "Labour", "votes_labour_and_co_operative": "Labour and Co-operative", "votes_liberal_democrat": "Liberal Democrat", "votes_newham_independents_party": "Newham Independents Party", "votes_people_before_profit_alliance": "People Before Profit Alliance", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_reform_uk": "Reform UK", "votes_rejoin_eu": "Rejoin EU", "votes_scottish_green_party": "Scottish Green Party", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_sinn_fein": "Sinn Fein", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party", "votes_social_democratic_and_labour_party": "Social Democratic and Labour Party", "votes_speaker": "Speaker", "votes_the_yorkshire_party": "The Yorkshire Party", "votes_trade_unionist_and_socialist_coaliti": "Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition", "votes_traditional_unionist_voice": "Traditional Unionist Voice", "votes_uk_independence_party": "UK Independence Party", "votes_ulster_unionist_party": "Ulster Unionist Party", "votes_workers_party_of_britain": "Workers Party of Britain", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 650, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:24:05.309431", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.864, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.951, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.832, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.75, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.5, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.144, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.286, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.124, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.043, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 650}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d39eea87d27b4641a3bb1dc1cb395b8f", "name": "UK 2019 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 650)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 2019, CONSTITUENCY level (650 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance": "Alliance", "votes_animal_welfare_party": "Animal Welfare Party", "votes_aont": "Aont\u00fa", "votes_ashfield_independents": "Ashfield Independents", "votes_birkenhead_social_justice_party": "Birkenhead Social Justice Party", "votes_brexit_party": "Brexit Party", "votes_christian_peoples_alliance_party": "Christian Peoples Alliance Party", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_democratic_unionist_party": "Democratic Unionist Party", "votes_green": "Green", "votes_heavy_woollen_district_independents": "Heavy Woollen District Independents", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_labour": "Labour", "votes_labour_and_co_operative": "Labour and Co-operative", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_democrat": "Liberal Democrat", "votes_linconshire_independents": "Linconshire Independents", "votes_monster_raving_loony_party": "Monster Raving Loony Party", "votes_people_before_profit_alliance": "People Before Profit Alliance", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_sinn_fein": "Sinn Fein", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party", "votes_social_democratic_and_labour_party": "Social Democratic and Labour Party", "votes_speaker": "Speaker", "votes_the_independent_group_for_change": "The Independent Group for Change", "votes_the_north_east_party": "The North East Party", "votes_the_yorkshire_party": "The Yorkshire Party", "votes_uk_independence_party": "UK Independence Party", "votes_ulster_unionist_party": "Ulster Unionist Party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 650, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:24:00.075497", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.919, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.958, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.854, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.787, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.369, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.569, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.787, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.716, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.916, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.041, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.041, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 650}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "12a83c0a324846e5b2584a48d67e8d2b", "name": "UK 2017 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 650)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 2017, CONSTITUENCY level (650 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_party": "Alliance Party", "votes_ashfield_independents": "Ashfield Independents", "votes_british_national_party_ii": "British National Party (ii)", "votes_christian_party_proclaiming_christ_s": "Christian Party, Proclaiming Christ's Lordship", "votes_christian_peoples_alliance": "Christian Peoples Alliance", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_democratic_unionist_party": "Democratic Unionist Party", "votes_english_democrats": "English Democrats", "votes_green_party": "Green Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_save_withybush_save_live": "Independent Save Withybush Save Lives", "votes_labour_and_co_operative": "Labour And Co-Operative", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberal_democrat_party": "Liberal Democrat Party", "votes_liberal_party_1989": "Liberal Party (1989 -)", "votes_national_health_action_party": "National Health Action Party", "votes_official_monster_raving_loony_party": "Official Monster Raving Loony Party", "votes_people_before_profit": "People Before Profit", "votes_pirate_party_uk": "Pirate Party UK", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_sinn_fein": "Sinn Fein", "votes_social_democratic_and_labour_party": "Social Democratic And Labour Party", "votes_speaker": "Speaker", "votes_the_north_east_party": "The North East Party", "votes_the_yorkshire_party": "The Yorkshire Party", "votes_traditional_unionist_voice": "Traditional Unionist Voice", "votes_uk_independence_party": "UK Independence Party", "votes_ulster_unionist_party": "Ulster Unionist Party", "votes_women_s_equality_party": "Women's Equality Party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 650, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 650}, "n_stations_flagged": 650, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:23:55.237545", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.915, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.958, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.865, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.801, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.531, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.389, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.038, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.038, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 650}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b9fa2689af564ac2b7932040e83cf961", "name": "UK 2015 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 650)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 2015, CONSTITUENCY level (650 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_party": "Alliance Party", "votes_cannabis_is_safer_than_alcohol_party": "Cannabis Is Safer Than Alcohol Party", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_democratic_unionist_party": "Democratic Unionist Party", "votes_english_democrats": "English Democrats", "votes_green_party": "Green Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_community_and_health_con": "Independent Community And Health Concern", "votes_independent_save_withybush_save_live": "Independent Save Withybush Save Lives", "votes_labour_and_co_operative": "Labour And Co-Operative", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberal_democrat_party": "Liberal Democrat Party", "votes_liberal_party_1989": "Liberal Party (1989 -)", "votes_lincolnshire_independents": "Lincolnshire Independents", "votes_mebyon_kernow": "Mebyon Kernow", "votes_national_health_action_party": "National Health Action Party", "votes_official_monster_raving_loony_party": "Official Monster Raving Loony Party", "votes_people_before_profit": "People Before Profit", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_respect_party_respect_unity_coalitio": "Respect Party (Respect-Unity Coalition)", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_sinn_fein": "Sinn Fein", "votes_social_democratic_and_labour_party": "Social Democratic And Labour Party", "votes_socialist_labour_party": "Socialist Labour Party", "votes_speaker": "Speaker", "votes_trade_unionist_and_socialist_coaliti": "Trade Unionist And Socialist Coalition", "votes_traditional_unionist_voice": "Traditional Unionist Voice", "votes_uk_independence_party": "UK Independence Party", "votes_ulster_unionist_party": "Ulster Unionist Party", "votes_yorkshire_first": "Yorkshire First", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 650, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:23:49.813665", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.721, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.961, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.855, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.788, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.721, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.961, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.788, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.04, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.04, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 650}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8ade238b968e45559da749ca10063112", "name": "UK 2010 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 650)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 2010, CONSTITUENCY level (650 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_party_of_northern_ireland": "Alliance Party Of Northern Ireland", "votes_blaenau_gwent_people_s_voice": "Blaenau Gwent People's Voice", "votes_british_national_party_ii": "British National Party (ii)", "votes_buckinghamshire_campaign_for_democra": "Buckinghamshire Campaign For Democracy", "votes_christian_party": "Christian Party", "votes_christian_peoples_alliance": "Christian Peoples Alliance", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_democratic_unionist_party": "Democratic Unionist Party", "votes_english_democrats": "English Democrats", "votes_green_party": "Green Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_community_and_health_con": "Independent Community And Health Concern", "votes_independent_save_our_green_belt": "Independent Save Our Green Belt", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberal_democrat_party": "Liberal Democrat Party", "votes_liberal_party_1989": "Liberal Party (1989 -)", "votes_lincolnshire_independents": "Lincolnshire Independents", "votes_mebyon_kernow": "Mebyon Kernow", "votes_national_front": "National Front", "votes_official_monster_raving_loony_party": "Official Monster Raving Loony Party", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_respect_party_respect_unity_coalitio": "Respect Party (Respect-Unity Coalition)", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_sinn_fein": "Sinn Fein", "votes_social_democratic_and_labour_party": "Social Democratic And Labour Party", "votes_socialist_labour_party": "Socialist Labour Party", "votes_trade_unionist_and_socialist_coaliti": "Trade Unionist And Socialist Coalition", "votes_traditional_unionist_voice": "Traditional Unionist Voice", "votes_ucunf_uup_and_con_joint_party": "UCUNF UUP And CON Joint Party", "votes_uk_independence_party": "UK Independence Party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 650, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:23:44.716477", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.766, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.965, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.866, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.802, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.766, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.965, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.961, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.396, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.748, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.596, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.399, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.741, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.04, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.04, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 650}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dbb828bda5d44d36a3ed45fde41defe4", "name": "UK 2005 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 646)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 2005, CONSTITUENCY level (646 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_party_of_northern_ireland": "Alliance Party Of Northern Ireland", "votes_british_national_party_ii": "British National Party (ii)", "votes_christian_peoples_alliance": "Christian Peoples Alliance", "votes_community_action_party": "Community Action Party", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_democratic_unionist_party": "Democratic Unionist Party", "votes_english_democrats": "English Democrats", "votes_forward_wales": "Forward Wales", "votes_green_party": "Green Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_kidderminster_hospital_a": "Independent Kidderminster Hospital And Health Concern", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_legalise_cannabis_alliance": "Legalise Cannabis Alliance", "votes_liberal_democrat_party": "Liberal Democrat Party", "votes_liberal_party_1989": "Liberal Party (1989 -)", "votes_mebyon_kernow": "Mebyon Kernow", "votes_national_front": "National Front", "votes_official_monster_raving_loony_party": "Official Monster Raving Loony Party", "votes_operation_christian_vote": "Operation Christian Vote", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_respect_party_respect_unity_coalitio": "Respect Party (Respect-Unity Coalition)", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_scottish_socialist_party": "Scottish Socialist Party", "votes_sinn_fein": "Sinn Fein", "votes_social_democratic_and_labour_party": "Social Democratic And Labour Party", "votes_socialist_alternative": "Socialist Alternative", "votes_socialist_labour_party": "Socialist Labour Party", "votes_uk_independence_party": "UK Independence Party", "votes_ulster_unionist_party": "Ulster Unionist Party", "votes_veritas": "Veritas", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 646, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:23:39.478781", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.768, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.966, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.863, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.8, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.966, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.992, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.96, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.406, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.748, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.605, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.401, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.758, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.758, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.04, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.04, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 646}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "931527698add43369c1256503e21ddf7", "name": "UK 2001 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 659)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2001, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 2001, CONSTITUENCY level (659 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_party_of_northern_ireland": "Alliance Party Of Northern Ireland", "votes_british_national_party_ii": "British National Party (ii)", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_democratic_unionist_party": "Democratic Unionist Party", "votes_green_party": "Green Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_kidderminster_hospital_a": "Independent Kidderminster Hospital And Health Concern", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_legalise_cannabis_alliance": "Legalise Cannabis Alliance", "votes_liberal_democrat_party": "Liberal Democrat Party", "votes_liberal_party_1989": "Liberal Party (1989 -)", "votes_mebyon_kernow": "Mebyon Kernow", "votes_national_front": "National Front", "votes_northern_ireland_women_s_coalition": "Northern Ireland Women's Coalition", "votes_official_monster_raving_loony_party": "Official Monster Raving Loony Party", "votes_people_s_justice": "People's Justice", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_progressive_unionist_party": "Progressive Unionist Party", "votes_prolife_alliance": "Prolife Alliance", "votes_rock_n_roll_loony_party": "Rock 'N' Roll Loony Party", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_scottish_socialist_party": "Scottish Socialist Party", "votes_scottish_unionist_party": "Scottish Unionist Party", "votes_sinn_fein": "Sinn Fein", "votes_social_democratic_and_labour_party": "Social Democratic And Labour Party", "votes_socialist_alliance": "Socialist Alliance", "votes_socialist_labour_party": "Socialist Labour Party", "votes_uk_independence_party": "UK Independence Party", "votes_ulster_unionist_party": "Ulster Unionist Party", "votes_united_kingdom_unionist_party": "United Kingdom Unionist Party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 659, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:23:34.405824", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.779, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.856, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.792, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.779, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.309, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.748, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.677, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.244, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.04, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.04, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 659}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "33df7c3e41324a11ba6097645fa900db", "name": "Thailand 2011 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 376)", "metadata": {"country": "Thailand", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Thailand lower-house election 2011, CONSTITUENCY level (376 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bhumjaithai": "Bhumjaithai", "votes_chartpattana_party": "Chartpattana Party", "votes_chartthaipattana_party": "Chartthaipattana Party", "votes_civil_peace_party": "Civil Peace Party", "votes_democrat_party": "Democrat Party", "votes_dumrongthai_party": "Dumrongthai Party", "votes_farmer_network_of_thailand": "Farmer Network of Thailand", "votes_for_heaven_and_earth_party": "For Heaven and Earth Party", "votes_mahachon_party": "Mahachon Party", "votes_maharatpattana_party": "Maharatpattana Party", "votes_mass_power_party": "Mass Power Party", "votes_matubhum_party": "Matubhum Party", "votes_new_aspiration_party": "New Aspiration Party", "votes_new_democracy_party": "New Democracy Party", "votes_new_politics_party": "New Politics Party", "votes_phalang_chon_party": "Phalang Chon Party", "votes_pheu_thai_party": "Pheu Thai Party", "votes_prachatham_party_2011": "Prachatham Party (2011)", "votes_rak_santi_party": "Rak Santi Party", "votes_rak_thailand": "Rak Thailand", "votes_social_action_party": "Social Action Party", "votes_sport_party_of_thailand": "Sport Party of Thailand", "votes_thaen_khun_phaendin_party": "Thaen Khun Phaendin Party", "votes_thai_agricultural_friends_party": "Thai Agricultural Friends Party", "votes_thai_citizen_party": "Thai Citizen Party", "votes_thai_liberal_party_2011": "Thai Liberal Party (2011)", "votes_thai_party_for_thai_people": "Thai Party for Thai People", "votes_thai_pen_thai_party": "Thai Pen Thai Party", "votes_thai_por_pieng_party": "Thai Por-Pieng Party", "votes_thai_pride_party": "Thai Pride Party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 376, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 376, "registered_not_positive": 376}, "n_stations_flagged": 376, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:23:29.635012", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.081, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.917, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.462, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.373, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.081, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.158, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.466, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.7, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.425, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.462, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.462, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.285, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.285, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.648, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 376}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d315c7de152c405ca1816a104cf189c8", "name": "Thailand 2007 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 165)", "metadata": {"country": "Thailand", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Thailand lower-house election 2007, CONSTITUENCY level (165 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat_party": "Democrat Party", "votes_democratic_development_party": "Democratic Development Party", "votes_dumrongthai_party": "Dumrongthai Party", "votes_farmer_network_of_thailand": "Farmer Network of Thailand", "votes_farmer_power_party": "Farmer Power Party", "votes_for_the_land_party": "For the Land Party", "votes_independence_party": "Independence Party", "votes_kasikorn_thai_party": "Kasikorn Thai Party", "votes_love_party_of_thailand": "Love Party of Thailand", "votes_moral_party": "Moral Party", "votes_namwithi_party": "Namwithi Party", "votes_national_unity_party": "National Unity Party", "votes_neutral_democratic_party": "Neutral Democratic Party", "votes_new_hope_party": "New Hope Party", "votes_people_power_party": "People Power Party", "votes_people_s_voice_party": "People's Voice Party", "votes_power_party_of_thailand": "Power Party of Thailand", "votes_pracharaj_party": "Pracharaj Party", "votes_public_party_2007": "Public Party (2007)", "votes_referendum_party": "Referendum Party", "votes_rich_thailand_party": "Rich Thailand Party", "votes_ruam_jai_thai_chart_patana_party": "Ruam Jai Thai Chart Patana Party", "votes_siam_santi": "Siam Santi", "votes_thai_agricultural_friends_party": "Thai Agricultural Friends Party", "votes_thai_citizen_party": "Thai Citizen Party", "votes_thai_farmer_party_2007": "Thai Farmer Party (2007)", "votes_thai_national_party_1": "Thai National Party (1)", "votes_thai_national_party_2": "Thai National Party (2)", "votes_thai_pen_thai_party": "Thai Pen Thai Party", "votes_thai_tribal_party": "Thai Tribal Party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 165, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 165, "cast_gt_registered": 165}, "n_stations_flagged": 165, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:23:26.184363", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.512, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.879, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.181, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.18, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.512, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.879, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.798, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.635, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.409, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.108, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.277, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.319, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.453, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.181, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.181, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.18, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.18, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.163, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.163, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.565, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.565, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.654, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 165}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3a6e7e1f84fb4e3b8824706c3cf75bae", "name": "Thailand 2005 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 401)", "metadata": {"country": "Thailand", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Thailand lower-house election 2005, CONSTITUENCY level (401 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat_party": "Democrat Party", "votes_democratic_national_party": "Democratic National Party", "votes_farmer_power_party": "Farmer Power Party", "votes_force_of_virtue": "Force of Virtue", "votes_kasikorn_thai_party": "Kasikorn Thai Party", "votes_krit_thai_kong_party": "Krit Thai Kong Party", "votes_labor_party_2005": "Labor Party (2005)", "votes_mahachon_party": "Mahachon Party", "votes_new_hope_party": "New Hope Party", "votes_people_s_power_party": "People's Power Party", "votes_protect_thai_land_party": "Protect Thai Land Party", "votes_social_action_party": "Social Action Party", "votes_thai_citizen_party": "Thai Citizen Party", "votes_thai_farmer_party_2005": "Thai Farmer Party (2005)", "votes_thai_ground_party": "Thai Ground Party", "votes_thai_help_thai": "Thai Help Thai", "votes_thai_nation": "Thai Nation", "votes_thai_national_development_party": "Thai National Development Party", "votes_thai_natural_party": "Thai Natural Party", "votes_thai_pen_thai_party": "Thai Pen Thai Party", "votes_thai_people_s_party_2005": "Thai People's Party (2005)", "votes_thai_rak_thai": "Thai Rak Thai", "votes_thai_resident_party": "Thai Resident Party", "votes_thai_tribal_party": "Thai Tribal Party", "votes_third_choice_party": "Third Choice Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 401, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 401, "cast_gt_registered": 401}, "n_stations_flagged": 401, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:23:22.089558", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.015, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.515, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.507, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.359, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.015, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.515, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.271, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.472, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.882, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.47, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.359, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.359, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.312, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.312, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.662, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.662, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.672, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 401}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "83e2573bdabf4c4a92044b7df74e200d", "name": "Thailand 2001 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 401)", "metadata": {"country": "Thailand", "year": 2001, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Thailand lower-house election 2001, CONSTITUENCY level (401 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_agriculture_party": "Agriculture Party", "votes_democrat_party": "Democrat Party", "votes_democratic_national_party": "Democratic National Party", "votes_farmer_development_party": "Farmer Development Party", "votes_farmer_power_party": "Farmer Power Party", "votes_force_of_virtue": "Force of Virtue", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_kasikorn_thai_party": "Kasikorn Thai Party", "votes_liberal_democrat_party": "Liberal Democrat Party", "votes_liberal_party": "Liberal Party", "votes_national_development": "National Development", "votes_new_aspiration_party": "New Aspiration Party", "votes_new_social_party": "New Social Party", "votes_people_power_party": "People Power Party", "votes_people_s_faith_party": "People's Faith Party", "votes_people_s_party": "People's Party", "votes_people_s_power_party": "People's Power Party", "votes_progressive_party": "Progressive Party", "votes_siam_party_2001": "Siam Party (2001)", "votes_social_action_party": "Social Action Party", "votes_social_democratic_party_2001": "Social Democratic Party (2001)", "votes_solidarity": "Solidarity", "votes_thai_citizen_party": "Thai Citizen Party", "votes_thai_democracy_party": "Thai Democracy Party", "votes_thai_local_party": "Thai Local Party", "votes_thai_maharaj_party": "Thai Maharaj Party", "votes_thai_nation": "Thai Nation", "votes_thai_party": "Thai Party", "votes_thai_rak_thai": "Thai Rak Thai", "votes_thai_thammathirat": "Thai Thammathirat", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 401, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 400, "registered_not_positive": 401}, "n_stations_flagged": 401, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:23:18.351687", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.079, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.877, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.55, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.412, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.079, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.386, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.486, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.223, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.556, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.472, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.18, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.55, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.412, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.329, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.329, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.73, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.73, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.662, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.662, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.703, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 401}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a62eac7faf8345eaa590209ae92063b8", "name": "Thailand 1996 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 156)", "metadata": {"country": "Thailand", "year": 1996, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Thailand lower-house election 1996, CONSTITUENCY level (156 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_chart_pattana": "Chart Pattana", "votes_chart_thai": "Chart Thai", "votes_democrat": "Democrat", "votes_liberal_democrat": "Liberal Democrat", "votes_muan_chon": "Muan Chon", "votes_new_aspiration": "New Aspiration", "votes_pala": "Pala", "votes_palang_tham": "Palang Tham", "votes_prachakorn_thai": "Prachakorn Thai", "votes_seritham": "Seritham", "votes_social_action": "Social Action", "votes_thai": "Thai", "votes_thai_labor": "Thai Labor", "votes_unity": "Unity"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 156, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 156, "cast_gt_registered": 156}, "n_stations_flagged": 156, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:23:14.465504", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.781, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.881, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.394, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.278, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.033, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.758, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.425, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.356, "year": 1996, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.162, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.041, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.379, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.595, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.66, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.165, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 1996, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.278, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.278, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.221, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.221, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.709, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 156}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9a98033f7a2544f397a858526cdc030c", "name": "Thailand 1995 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 155)", "metadata": {"country": "Thailand", "year": 1995, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Thailand lower-house election 1995, CONSTITUENCY level (155 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_chart_pattana": "Chart Pattana", "votes_chart_thai": "Chart Thai", "votes_damrong_thai": "Damrong Thai", "votes_democrat": "Democrat", "votes_muan_chon": "Muan Chon", "votes_nam_thai": "Nam Thai", "votes_new_aspiration": "New Aspiration", "votes_palang_tham": "Palang Tham", "votes_prachakorn_thai": "Prachakorn Thai", "votes_seritham": "Seritham", "votes_social_action": "Social Action", "votes_unity": "Unity"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 155, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 155, "registered_not_positive": 155}, "n_stations_flagged": 155, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:23:11.481656", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.797, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.888, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.412, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.307, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.797, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.046, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.417, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.354, "year": 1995, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.162, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.041, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.379, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.595, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.652, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.163, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.412, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 1995, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.307, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.307, "year": 1995, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.228, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.228, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.709, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 155}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ee7dc54de81c408681648c40fb1fb13e", "name": "Tanzania 2020 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 265)", "metadata": {"country": "Tanzania", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Tanzania lower-house election 2020, CONSTITUENCY level (265 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_african_democratic_alliance_tanzania": "African Democratic Alliance-Tanzania Democratic Alliance", "votes_alliance_for_african_farmers_party": "Alliance for African Farmers' Party", "votes_alliance_for_change_and_transparency": "Alliance for Change and Transparency-Wazalendo", "votes_alliance_for_democratic_change": "Alliance for Democratic Change", "votes_chama_cha_demokrasia_na_maendeleo": "Chama Cha Demokrasia na Maendeleo", "votes_chama_cha_kijamii": "Chama Cha Kijamii", "votes_chama_cha_mapinduzi": "Chama Cha Mapinduzi", "votes_chama_cha_ukombozi_wa_umma": "Chama Cha Ukombozi wa Umma", "votes_civic_united_front": "Civic United Front", "votes_democratic_party": "Democratic Party", "votes_demokrasia_makini": "Demokrasia Makini", "votes_national_convention_for_construction": "National Convention for Construction and Reform-Mageuzi", "votes_national_league_for_democracy": "National League for Democracy", "votes_national_reconstruction_alliance": "National Reconstruction Alliance", "votes_sauti_ya_umma": "Sauti ya Umma", "votes_tanzania_labor_party": "Tanzania Labor Party", "votes_union_for_multiparty_democracy": "Union for Multiparty Democracy", "votes_united_democratic_party": "United Democratic Party", "votes_united_peoples_democratic_party": "United Peoples Democratic Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 265, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 265, "cast_gt_registered": 236}, "n_stations_flagged": 265, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:23:08.161103", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.748, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.179, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.383, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.33, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.748, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.179, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.955, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.489, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.24, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.368, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.592, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.259, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.383, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.383, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.33, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.326, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.326, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.298, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.298, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.567, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.567, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 265}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ec74051c9d514dd08ab63244221e1747", "name": "Tanzania 2015 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 257)", "metadata": {"country": "Tanzania", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Tanzania lower-house election 2015, CONSTITUENCY level (257 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_ada_tadea": "ADA-TADEA", "votes_alliance_for_change_and_transparency": "Alliance for Change and Transparency", "votes_alliance_for_tanzania_farmers_party": "Alliance for Tanzania Farmers Party", "votes_chama_cha_demokrasia_na_maendeleo": "Chama cha Demokrasia na Maendeleo", "votes_chama_cha_haki_na_usitawi": "Chama cha Haki na Usitawi", "votes_chama_cha_kijamii": "Chama cha Kijamii", "votes_chama_cha_mapinduzi": "Chama cha Mapinduzi", "votes_chama_cha_ukombozi_wa_umma": "Chama cha Ukombozi wa Umma", "votes_civic_united_front": "Civic United Front", "votes_democratic_party": "Democratic Party", "votes_demokrasia_makini": "Demokrasia Makini", "votes_jahazi_asilia_candidate": "Jahazi Asilia Candidate", "votes_national_convention_for_construction": "National Convention for Construction and Reform-Mageuzi", "votes_national_league_for_democracy": "National League for Democracy", "votes_national_reconstruction_alliance": "National Reconstruction Alliance", "votes_progressive_party_of_tanzania_maende": "Progressive Party of Tanzania-Maendeleo", "votes_sauti_ya_umma": "Sauti ya Umma", "votes_tanzania_labour_party": "Tanzania Labour Party", "votes_umoja_wa_mabadiliko_ya_demokrasia": "Umoja wa Mabadiliko ya Demokrasia", "votes_union_for_multiparty_democracy": "Union for Multiparty Democracy", "votes_united_democratic_party": "United Democratic Party", "votes_united_people_s_democratic_party": "United People\u2019s Democratic Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 257, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 257, "cast_gt_registered": 257}, "n_stations_flagged": 257, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:23:03.372763", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.378, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.583, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.453, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.391, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.378, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.595, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.583, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.474, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.572, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.393, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.684, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.115, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.279, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.453, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.453, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.391, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.391, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.355, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.355, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.741, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.787, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.429, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Party of the Revolution (CCM)", "winner_candidate": "John Magufuli", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Party for Democracy and Progress (CHADEMA)", "margin": 18.49, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "TZA", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 257}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6e2069b47c6048c8bd2f91aef8190132", "name": "Tanzania 2005 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 224)", "metadata": {"country": "Tanzania", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Tanzania lower-house election 2005, CONSTITUENCY level (224 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_chama_cha_demokrasia_na_maendeleo": "Chama cha Demokrasia na Maendeleo", "votes_chama_cha_haki_na_usitawi": "Chama cha Haki na Usitawi", "votes_chama_cha_mapinduzi": "Chama cha Mapinduzi", "votes_civic_united_front": "Civic United Front", "votes_democratic_party": "Democratic Party", "votes_demokrasia_makini": "Demokrasia Makini", "votes_forum_for_the_restoration_of_democra": "Forum for the Restoration of Democracy", "votes_jahazi_asilia_candidate": "Jahazi Asilia Candidate", "votes_national_convention_for_construction": "National Convention for Construction and Reform-Mageuzi", "votes_national_league_for_democracy": "National League for Democracy", "votes_national_reconstruction_alliance": "National Reconstruction Alliance", "votes_progressive_party_of_tanzania_maende": "Progressive Party of Tanzania-Maendeleo", "votes_sauti_ya_umma": "Sauti ya Umma", "votes_tanzania_democratic_alliance": "Tanzania Democratic Alliance", "votes_tanzania_labour_party": "Tanzania Labour Party", "votes_union_for_multiparty_democracy": "Union for Multiparty Democracy", "votes_united_democratic_party": "United Democratic Party", "votes_united_people_s_democratic_party": "United People\u2019s Democratic Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 224, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 219}, "n_stations_flagged": 219, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:22:59.986220", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.707, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.777, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.429, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.372, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.707, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.777, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.518, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.629, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.7, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.425, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.167, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.429, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.372, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.326, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.326, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.468, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.468, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "CCM", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "CUF", "margin": 68.6, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "TZA", "year": 2005, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 224}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "18f17cb1976b4363ad28bf83296a8b65", "name": "South Africa 1989 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 166)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 1989, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "South Africa lower-house election 1989, CONSTITUENCY level (166 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative_party": "Conservative Party", "votes_democratic_party": "Democratic Party", "votes_democratic_reform_party": "Democratic Reform Party", "votes_freedom_party": "Freedom Party", "votes_herstigte_nasionale_party": "Herstigte Nasionale Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_merit_people_s_party": "Merit People's Party", "votes_national_federal_party": "National Federal Party", "votes_national_party": "National Party", "votes_national_people_s_party": "National People's Party", "votes_people_s_party": "People's Party", "votes_progressive_independent_party": "Progressive Independent Party", "votes_republican_party": "Republican Party", "votes_solidarity": "Solidarity", "votes_united_democratic_party": "United Democratic Party", "votes_united_party": "United Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 166, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 72, "registered_not_positive": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 74, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:22:56.511128", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.485, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.521, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.186, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.121, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.485, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 1989, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.521, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.615, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 1989, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.392, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.348, "year": 1989, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.04, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.51, "year": 1989, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.812, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 1989, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.312, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 1989, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.186, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.121, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.121, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.039, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.039, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.135, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.135, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.378, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.378, "year": 1989, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.441, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.441, "year": 1989, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.275, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.275, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 166}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d8332e44ff4f4dd1819587a92b3e3832", "name": "South Africa 1987 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 166)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 1987, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "South Africa lower-house election 1987, CONSTITUENCY level (166 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative_party": "Conservative Party", "votes_herstigte_nasionale_party": "Herstigte Nasionale Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_national_party": "National Party", "votes_new_republic_party": "New Republic Party", "votes_progressive_federal_party": "Progressive Federal Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 166, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:22:53.765275", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.481, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.521, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.176, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.118, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.481, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 1987, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.521, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.631, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 1987, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.349, "year": 1987, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.273, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 1987, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.812, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.312, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 1987, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.176, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.176, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.118, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.118, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.037, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.037, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.126, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.126, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.378, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.378, "year": 1987, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.441, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.441, "year": 1987, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.248, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.248, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 166}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "03de9448ba0d48ccb30b016f575ee124", "name": "South Africa 1981 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 165)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 1981, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "South Africa lower-house election 1981, CONSTITUENCY level (165 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_herstigte_nasionale_party": "Herstigte Nasionale Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_national_conservative_party": "National Conservative Party", "votes_national_party": "National Party", "votes_new_republic_party": "New Republic Party", "votes_progressive_federal_party": "Progressive Federal Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 165, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 12}, "n_stations_flagged": 12, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:22:50.874455", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.466, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.822, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.176, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.096, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.466, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.366, "year": 1981, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.612, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 1981, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.35, "year": 1981, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.273, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 1981, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.812, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 1981, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.301, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.325, "year": 1981, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.176, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.176, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.096, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.096, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.034, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.034, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.121, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.121, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.378, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.378, "year": 1981, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.441, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.441, "year": 1981, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.248, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.248, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 165}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d3973497af794735b72b4a77b7436178", "name": "South Africa 1977 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 165)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 1977, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "South Africa lower-house election 1977, CONSTITUENCY level (165 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_994": "-994", "votes_democratic_national_party": "Democratic National Party", "votes_herstigte_nasionale_party": "Herstigte Nasionale Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_national_party": "Independent (National Party)", "votes_national_party": "National Party", "votes_new_republic_party": "New Republic Party", "votes_progressive_federal_party": "Progressive Federal Party", "votes_south_african_party": "South African Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 165, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 45}, "n_stations_flagged": 45, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:22:46.264510", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.469, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.825, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.163, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.093, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.469, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.367, "year": 1977, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1977, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.621, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.405, "year": 1977, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.395, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.349, "year": 1977, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.273, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 1977, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.812, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 1977, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.222, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.305, "year": 1977, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.163, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.163, "year": 1977, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.093, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1977, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.032, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.032, "year": 1977, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.126, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.126, "year": 1977, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.378, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.378, "year": 1977, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.441, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.441, "year": 1977, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.255, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.255, "year": 1977, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 165}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e2fcb4ee0a0a42cfbf4ef62de1908271", "name": "Sierra Leone 2018 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 132)", "metadata": {"country": "Sierra Leone", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Sierra Leone lower-house election 2018, CONSTITUENCY level (132 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_990": "-990", "votes_alliance_democratic_party": "ALLIANCE DEMOCRATIC PARTY", "votes_all_people_s_congress_apc": "All People's Congress (APC)", "votes_citizens_democratic_party": "CITIZENS DEMOCRATIC PARTY", "votes_coalition_for_change": "COALITION FOR CHANGE", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_national_grand_coalition": "NATIONAL GRAND COALITION", "votes_national_progressive_democrats": "NATIONAL PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRATS", "votes_national_unity_and_reconciliation_pa": "NATIONAL UNITY AND RECONCILIATION PARTY", "votes_national_democratic_alliance_nda": "National Democratic Alliance (NDA)", "votes_people_s_democratic_party": "PEOPLE'S DEMOCRATIC PARTY", "votes_peace_and_liberation_party_plp": "Peace and Liberation Party (PLP)", "votes_people_s_movement_for_democratic_cha": "People's Movement for Democratic Change (PMDC)", "votes_republic_national_independent_party": "REPUBLIC NATIONAL INDEPENDENT PARTY", "votes_revolutionary_united_front_party": "Revolutionary United Front Party", "votes_sierra_leone_people_s_party_slpp": "Sierra Leone People's Party (SLPP)", "votes_united_democratic_movement": "UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT", "votes_unity_party": "UNITY PARTY", "votes_united_national_people_s_party_unpp": "United National People's Party (UNPP)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 132, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 132, "cast_gt_registered": 131}, "n_stations_flagged": 132, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:22:42.536431", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.889, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.846, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.548, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.38, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.769, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.089, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.522, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.529, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.051, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.513, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.274, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.548, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.38, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.38, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.344, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.344, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.469, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.77, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Sierra Leone People's Party (SLPP)", "winner_candidate": "Julius Maada Bio", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "All People's Congress (APC)", "margin": 3.6, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SLE", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 132}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f6db431a972745a5bc0ba1b6fd4e72ed", "name": "Sierra Leone 2012 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 112)", "metadata": {"country": "Sierra Leone", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Sierra Leone lower-house election 2012, CONSTITUENCY level (112 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_people_s_congress_apc": "All People's Congress (APC)", "votes_citizens_democratic_party": "Citizens Democratic Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_national_democratic_alliance_nda": "National Democratic Alliance (NDA)", "votes_peace_and_liberation_party_plp": "Peace and Liberation Party (PLP)", "votes_people_s_democratic_party": "People's Democratic Party", "votes_people_s_movement_for_democratic_cha": "People's Movement for Democratic Change (PMDC)", "votes_revolutionary_united_front_party": "Revolutionary United Front Party", "votes_sierra_leone_people_s_party_slpp": "Sierra Leone People's Party (SLPP)", "votes_united_democratic_movement": "United Democratic Movement", "votes_united_national_people_s_party_unpp": "United National People's Party (UNPP)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 112, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 112, "cast_gt_registered": 110}, "n_stations_flagged": 112, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:22:39.122464", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.71, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.997, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.508, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.324, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.997, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.695, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.704, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.426, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.425, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.489, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.61, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.508, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.508, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.324, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.324, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.288, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.485, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "APC", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "SLPP", "margin": 21.88, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SLE", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 112}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "17da6d8abb814b96936fb6ef490e22b9", "name": "Sierra Leone 2007 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 112)", "metadata": {"country": "Sierra Leone", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Sierra Leone lower-house election 2007, CONSTITUENCY level (112 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_people_s_congress_apc": "All People's Congress (APC)", "votes_convention_people_s_party_cpp": "Convention People's Party (CPP)", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_national_democratic_alliance_nda": "National Democratic Alliance (NDA)", "votes_peace_and_liberation_party_plp": "Peace and Liberation Party (PLP)", "votes_people_s_movement_for_democratic_cha": "People's Movement for Democratic Change (PMDC)", "votes_sierra_leone_people_s_party_slpp": "Sierra Leone People's Party (SLPP)", "votes_united_national_people_s_party_unpp": "United National People's Party (UNPP)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 112, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 112, "cast_valid_mismatch": 4, "registered_not_positive": 112}, "n_stations_flagged": 112, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:22:36.017591", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.669, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.027, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.539, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.346, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.027, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.398, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.349, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.489, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.539, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.539, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.346, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.346, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.306, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "APC", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "SLPP", "margin": 9.24, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SLE", "year": 2007, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 112}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5b1d9e6be9ae4dc3bb14beee4ba10e39", "name": "Russian Federation 2016 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 226)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Russian Federation lower-house election 2016, CONSTITUENCY level (226 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_a_just_russia": "A Just Russia", "votes_civic_platform": "Civic Platform", "votes_civilian_power": "Civilian Power", "votes_communist_party_of_the_russian_feder": "Communist Party of The Russian Federation", "votes_communists_of_russia": "Communists of Russia", "votes_greens": "Greens", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_liberal_democratic_party": "Liberal Democratic Party", "votes_party_of_growth": "Party of Growth", "votes_patriots_of_russia": "Patriots of Russia", "votes_people_s_freedom_party": "People's Freedom Party", "votes_rodina": "Rodina", "votes_russian_party_of_pensioners_for_just": "Russian Party of Pensioners for Justice", "votes_russian_united_democratic_party_yabl": "Russian United Democratic Party (Yabloko)", "votes_united_russia": "United Russia", "votes_yabloko": "Yabloko"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 226, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:22:33.173878", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.891, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.6, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.263, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.106, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.473, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.6, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.19, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.547, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.256, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.965, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.241, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.576, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.057, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.264, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.263, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.263, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.106, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.106, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.204, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.466, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.466, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.077, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.077, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.716, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.306, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 226}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9a1543fabc714ca0a19eaf9be8ac9e60", "name": "Russian Federation 2011 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Russian Federation lower-house election 2011, CONSTITUENCY level (1 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_a_just_russia": "A Just Russia", "votes_communist_party": "Communist Party", "votes_liberal_democratic_party": "Liberal Democratic Party", "votes_patroits_of_russia": "Patroits of Russia", "votes_right_cause": "Right Cause", "votes_russian_united_democratic_party_yabl": "Russian United Democratic Party (Yabloko)", "votes_united_russia": "United Russia"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:22:29.831070", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.737, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.331, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.299, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.134, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.331, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.583, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.205, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.608, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.152, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.313, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.451, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.108, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.277, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.299, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.299, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.134, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.225, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.225, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.125, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.125, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.429, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "United Russia", "winner_candidate": "Vladimir Putin", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Communist Party of the Russian Federation", "margin": 46.42, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "RUS", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "033294728e614f1c910f6b35bcc66ee5", "name": "Russian Federation 2007 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Russian Federation lower-house election 2007, CONSTITUENCY level (1 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_a_just_russia": "A Just Russia", "votes_agrarian_party": "Agrarian Party", "votes_civilian_power": "Civilian Power", "votes_communist_party": "Communist Party", "votes_democratic_party": "Democratic Party", "votes_liberal_democratic": "Liberal Democratic", "votes_party_of_social_justice": "Party of Social Justice", "votes_patroits_of_russia": "Patroits of Russia", "votes_russian_united_democratic_party_yabl": "Russian United Democratic Party (Yabloko)", "votes_union_of_right_forces": "Union of Right Forces", "votes_united_russia": "United Russia"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:22:27.310274", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.074, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.632, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.316, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.146, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.074, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.518, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.632, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.25, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.23, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.354, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.339, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.459, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.103, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.146, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.146, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.237, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.237, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.159, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.159, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.444, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.444, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "United Russia", "winner_candidate": "Dmitry Medvedev", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Communist Party of the Russian Federation", "margin": 53.2, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "RUS", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f40b5cd396ae46bd8e3e584176fc5b2c", "name": "Russian Federation 2003 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 226)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 2003, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Russian Federation lower-house election 2003, CONSTITUENCY level (226 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_990": "-990", "votes_against_all": "Against All", "votes_agrarian_party_of_russia": "Agrarian Party of Russia", "votes_agrarian_party_of_russia_of_russia": "Agrarian Party of Russia of Russia", "votes_communist_party_of_the_russian_feder": "Communist Party of the Russian Federation", "votes_communist_party_of_the_rus_2": "Communist Party of the Russian Federation of the Russian Federation", "votes_development_of_entrepreneurship": "Development of entrepreneurship", "votes_homeland_union": "Homeland Union", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_liberal_democratic_party_of_russia": "Liberal Democratic Party of Russia", "votes_liberal_democratic_party_of_russia_o": "Liberal Democratic Party of Russia of Russia", "votes_mk_ar": "MK - AR", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_people_s_party": "People's Party", "votes_people_s_party_of_russia": "People's Party of Russia", "votes_people_s_party_of_the_russian_federa": "People's Party of the Russian Federation", "votes_rpp_and_pss": "RPP and PSS", "votes_rebirth_of_russia": "Rebirth of Russia", "votes_rodina": "Rodina", "votes_rodnia": "Rodnia", "votes_rus": "Rus", "votes_russian_penioners_party": "Russian Penioners' Party", "votes_tac_rpj": "TAC - RPJ", "votes_tac_rpw": "TAC - RPW", "votes_union_of_right_forces": "UNION OF RIGHT FORCES", "votes_union_of_right_forces_2": "Union of Right Forces", "votes_united_russia": "United Russia", "votes_vr_eu": "VR - EU", "votes_yabloko": "YABLOKO", "votes_yabloko_2": "YaBloko", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 226, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 225, "cast_gt_registered": 225}, "n_stations_flagged": 225, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:22:24.379369", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.255, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.55, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.339, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.165, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.255, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.564, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.55, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.637, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.587, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.46, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.365, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.431, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.105, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.339, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.339, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.165, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.165, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.564, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.564, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.159, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.159, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.478, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.478, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent, supported by United Russia", "winner_candidate": "Vladimir Putin", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Communist Party of the Russian Federation", "margin": 58.11, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "RUS", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 226}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fdc27871c4c149318a957c85dbe4f172", "name": "Russian Federation 1999 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 225)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 1999, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Russian Federation lower-house election 1999, CONSTITUENCY level (225 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_against_all": "Against all", "votes_all_russian_people_s_party": "All-Russian People's Party", "votes_all_russian_political_movement_in_su": "All-Russian Political Movement in Support of the Army", "votes_all_russian_socio_political_movement": "All-Russian Socio-Political Movement \"Spiritual Heritage\"", "votes_all_russian_socio_politica_2": "All-Russian socio-political movement \"SPIRITUAL HERITAGE\"", "votes_andrei_nikolayev_and_svyatoslav_fyod": "Andrei Nikolayev and Svyatoslav Fyodorov Bloc", "votes_communist_party": "Communist Party", "votes_communists_and_workers_of_russia_for": "Communists and Workers of Russia \u2013 for the Soviet Union", "votes_congress_of_russian_communities_yury": "Congress of Russian Communities \u2013Yury Boldyrev Movement", "votes_congress_of_russian_commun_2": "Congress of Russian Communities\u2013Yury Boldyrev Movement", "votes_conservative_movement_of_russia": "Conservative Movement of Russia", "votes_fatherland_all_russia": "Fatherland \u2013 All Russia", "votes_for_civil_dignity": "For Civil Dignity", "votes_our_home_russia": "Our Home \u2013 Russia", "votes_party_of_peace_and_unity": "Party of Peace and Unity", "votes_party_of_pensioners": "Party of Pensioners", "votes_peace_labour_may": "Peace, Labour, May", "votes_russian_all_people_s_union": "Russian All-People's Union", "votes_russian_cause": "Russian Cause", "votes_russian_party_for_the_protection_of_": "Russian Party for the Protection of Women", "votes_russian_socialist_party": "Russian Socialist Party", "votes_social_democrats_of_russia": "Social-Democrats of Russia", "votes_socialist_party_of_russia": "Socialist Party of Russia", "votes_the_stalin_bloc_for_the_ussr": "The Stalin Bloc \u2013 For the USSR", "votes_union_of_right_forces": "Union of Right Forces", "votes_unity": "Unity", "votes_women_of_russia": "Women of Russia", "votes_yabloko": "Yabloko", "votes_zhirinovsky_bloc": "Zhirinovsky Bloc"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 225, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 224, "cast_gt_registered": 224}, "n_stations_flagged": 224, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:22:18.246825", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.572, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.187, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.461, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.284, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.572, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.643, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.187, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.374, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.344, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.982, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.495, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.442, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.453, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.461, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.461, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.284, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.284, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.312, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.312, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.709, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.315, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.315, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "Vladimir Putin", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Communist Party of the Russian Federation", "margin": 23.9, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "RUS", "year": 2000, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 225}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7dd74f3c2fba470b9a10057ad1da2c86", "name": "Romania 2012 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 315)", "metadata": {"country": "Romania", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Romania lower-house election 2012, CONSTITUENCY level (315 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alianta_rom_nia_dreapta": "alianta rom\u00e2nia dreapta", "votes_asociatia_italienilor_din_romania": "asociatia italienilor din romania", "votes_asociatia_macedonenilor_slavi_din_ro": "asociatia macedonenilor slavi din romania", "votes_asociatia_partida_romilor_pro_europa": "asociatia partida romilor \"pro-europa\"", "votes_comunitatea_rusilor_lipoveni_din_rom": "comunitatea rusilor lipoveni din romania", "votes_erd_lyi_magyar_n_pp_rt_partidul_popu": "erd\u00e9lyi magyar n\u00e9pp\u00e1rt - partidul popular maghiar din transilvania", "votes_federatia_comunitatilor_evreiesti_di": "federatia comunitatilor evreiesti din romania", "votes_forumul_democrat_al_germanilor_din_r": "forumul democrat al germanilor din romania", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_liga_albanezilor_din_romania": "liga albanezilor din romania", "votes_partidul_alianta_socialista": "partidul alianta socialista", "votes_partidul_ecologist_roman": "partidul ecologist roman", "votes_partidul_poporului_dan_diaconescu": "partidul poporului - dan diaconescu", "votes_partidul_popular": "partidul popular", "votes_partidul_popular_si_al_protectiei_so": "partidul popular si al protectiei sociale", "votes_partidul_romania_mare": "partidul romania mare", "votes_partidul_social_democrat_al_muncitor": "partidul social democrat al muncitorilor", "votes_uniunea_armenilor_din_romania": "uniunea armenilor din romania", "votes_uniunea_bulgara_din_banat_romania": "uniunea bulgara din banat - romania", "votes_uniunea_croatilor_din_romania": "uniunea croatilor din romania", "votes_uniunea_culturala_a_rutenilor_din_ro": "uniunea culturala a rutenilor din romania", "votes_uniunea_democrata_a_maghiarilor_din_": "uniunea democrata a maghiarilor din romania", "votes_uniunea_democrata_a_tatarilor_turco_": "uniunea democrata a tatarilor turco musulmani din romania", "votes_uniunea_democrata_turca_din_romania": "uniunea democrata turca din romania", "votes_uniunea_democratica_a_slovacilor_si_": "uniunea democratica a slovacilor si cehilor din romania", "votes_uniunea_elena_din_romania": "uniunea elena din romania", "votes_uniunea_polinezilor_din_romania": "uniunea polinezilor din romania", "votes_uniunea_sarbilor_din_romania": "uniunea sarbilor din romania", "votes_uniunea_social_liberala": "uniunea social liberala", "votes_uniunea_ucrainienilor_din_romania": "uniunea ucrainienilor din romania", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 315, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 172}, "n_stations_flagged": 172, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:22:12.956276", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.419, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.92, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.674, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.419, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.316, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.038, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.509, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.184, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.259, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.16, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.674, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.537, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 315}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "27cf76160e1e45e196c480c8ff755075", "name": "Philippines 2019 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 244)", "metadata": {"country": "Philippines", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Philippines lower-house election 2019, CONSTITUENCY level (244 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_act_teachers": "ACT Teachers", "votes_aksyon": "AKSYON", "votes_abono": "Abono", "votes_ako_bicol_political_party": "Ako Bicol Political Party", "votes_ako_bisaya": "Ako Bisaya", "votes_alyansa_ng_mga_mamamayang_probinsyan": "Alyansa ng mga Mamamayang Probinsyano", "votes_an_waray": "An Waray", "votes_anti_crime_and_terrorism_community_i": "Anti-Crime and Terrorism Community Involvement and Support", "votes_association_of_philippine_electric_c": "Association of Philippine Electric Cooperatives", "votes_bayan_muna": "Bayan Muna", "votes_citizens_battle_against_corruption": "Citizens' Battle Against Corruption", "votes_coalition_of_association_of_senior_c": "Coalition of Association of Senior Citizens in the Philippines", "votes_cooperative_natcco_party": "Cooperative NATCCO Party", "votes_gabriela_women_s_party": "Gabriela Women's Party", "votes_hugpong_ng_pagbabago": "Hugpong ng Pagbabago", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_lakas": "LAKAS", "votes_magkakasama_sa_sakahan_kaunlaran": "Magkakasama sa Sakahan Kaunlaran", "votes_marino_samahan_ng_mga_seaman": "Marino Samahan ng mga Seaman", "votes_nacionalista_party": "Nacionalista Party", "votes_national_unity_party": "National Unity Party", "votes_nationalist_people_s_coalition": "Nationalist People's Coalition", "votes_one_patriotic_coalition_of_marginali": "One Patriotic Coalition of Marginalized Nationals", "votes_pdp_laban": "PDP-Laban", "votes_partido_federal_ng_pilipinas": "Partido Federal ng Pilipinas", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas", "votes_philippine_rural_electric_cooperativ": "Philippine Rural Electric Cooperatives Association", "votes_probinsyano_ako": "Probinsyano Ako", "votes_pwersa_ng_masang_pilipino": "Pwersa ng Masang Pilipino", "votes_tingog_sinirangan": "Tingog Sinirangan", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 244, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 244}, "n_stations_flagged": 244, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:22:09.487191", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.787, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.779, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.428, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.28, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.697, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.779, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.449, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.257, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.314, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.602, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.527, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.382, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.675, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.428, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.428, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.28, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.28, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.192, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.192, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.53, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.53, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.61, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.656, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 244}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a1e9151ebf1240e9bc6cb124caf717d6", "name": "Philippines 2016 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 239)", "metadata": {"country": "Philippines", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Philippines lower-house election 2016, CONSTITUENCY level (239 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_1_guardians_nationalist_of_the_phili": "1 Guardians Nationalist of the Philippines, Inc", "votes_act_teachers": "ACT Teachers", "votes_abono": "Abono", "votes_advocacy_for_teacher_empowerment_thr": "Advocacy for Teacher Empowerment Through Action, Cooperation and Harmony Towards Educational Reforms", "votes_agri_agra_na_reforma_para_sa_magsasa": "Agri-Agra na Reforma para sa Magsasaka ng Pilipinas Movement", "votes_agricultural_sector_alliance_of_the_": "Agricultural Sector Alliance of the Philippines", "votes_akbayan": "Akbayan", "votes_ako_bicol_political_party": "Ako Bicol Political Party", "votes_aksyon_demokratiko": "Aksyon Demokratiko", "votes_an_waray": "An Waray", "votes_anak_mindanao": "Anak Mindanao", "votes_ang_asosasyon_sang_mangunguma_nga_bi": "Ang Asosasyon Sang Mangunguma Nga Bisaya Owa Mangunguma", "votes_bayan_muna": "Bayan Muna", "votes_buhay_hayaan_yumabong": "Buhay Hayaan Yumabong", "votes_citizens_battle_against_corruption": "Citizens' Battle Against Corruption", "votes_coalition_of_associations_of_senior_": "Coalition of Associations of Senior Citizens in the Philippines", "votes_cooperative_natcco_network_party": "Cooperative NATCCO Network Party", "votes_democratic_independent_workers_assoc": "Democratic Independent Workers Association", "votes_gabriela_women_s_party": "Gabriela Women's Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_kabalikat_ng_mamamayan": "Kabalikat ng Mamamayan", "votes_lakas": "LAKAS", "votes_national_unity_party": "National Unity Party", "votes_partido_demokratiko_pilipino_lakas_n": "Partido Demokratiko Pilipino-Lakas Ng Bayan", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas", "votes_people_s_progressive_alliance_for_pe": "People's Progressive Alliance for Peace and Good Government Towards Alleviation of Poverty and Social Advancement", "votes_puwersa_ng_bayaning_atleta": "Puwersa ng Bayaning Atleta", "votes_trade_union_congress_party": "Trade Union Congress Party", "votes_united_nationalist_alliance": "United Nationalist Alliance", "votes_you_against_corruption_and_poverty": "You Against Corruption and Poverty", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 239, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 71}, "n_stations_flagged": 71, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:22:05.942829", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.065, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.576, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.485, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.346, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.576, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.719, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.353, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.527, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.382, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.695, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.485, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.346, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.346, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.24, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.24, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.647, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.691, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.744, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 239}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2789437692c04f8d8c5575d0d5f0e7a7", "name": "Philippines 2013 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 235)", "metadata": {"country": "Philippines", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Philippines lower-house election 2013, CONSTITUENCY level (235 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_1st_consumers_alliance_for_rural_ene": "1st Consumers Alliance for Rural Energy, Inc.", "votes_abante_mindanao_inc": "Abante Mindanao, Inc.", "votes_abono_party_list": "Abono Party-List", "votes_act_teachers_party_list": "Act Teachers Party-List", "votes_advocacy_for_teacher_empowerment_thr": "Advocacy for Teacher Empowerment through Action Cooperation and Harmony Towards Educational Reforms", "votes_agricultural_sector_alliance_of_the_": "Agricultural Sector Alliance Of The Philippines", "votes_akbayan_citizens_action_party": "Akbayan Citizens' Action Party", "votes_ako_bicol_political_party": "Ako Bicol Political Party", "votes_an_waray": "An Waray", "votes_anak_mindanao_party_list": "Anak Mindanao Party-List", "votes_anti_crime_and_terrorism_community_i": "Anti-Crime and Terrorism Community Involvement and Support, Inc.", "votes_bayan_muna": "Bayan Muna", "votes_buhay_hayaan_yumabong": "Buhay Hayaan Yumabong", "votes_butil_farmers_party": "Butil Farmers Party", "votes_citizens_battle_against_corruption": "Citizens' Battle Against Corruption", "votes_coalition_of_association_of_senior_c": "Coalition Of Association Of Senior Citizens In The Philippines", "votes_cooperative_natcoo_network_party": "Cooperative NATCOO Network Party", "votes_gabriela_women_s_party": "Gabriela Women's Party", "votes_ind": "IND", "votes_kalinga_advocacy_for_social_empowerm": "Kalinga-Advocacy for Social Empowerment and Nation-Building through Easing Poverty, Inc.", "votes_lpg_marketers_association_inc": "LPG Marketers Association, Inc", "votes_magdalo_para_sa_pilipino": "Magdalo Para Sa Pilipino", "votes_nup": "NUP", "votes_ofw_family_club_inc": "Ofw Family Club, Inc.", "votes_pdp": "PDP", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas", "votes_partido_nacionalista": "Partido Nacionalista", "votes_una": "UNA", "votes_lakas_christian_muslim_democrats": "lakas-christian muslim democrats", "votes_nationalist_people_s_coalition": "nationalist people's coalition", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 235, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 235, "registered_not_positive": 235}, "n_stations_flagged": 235, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:22:02.365036", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.931, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.783, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.521, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.408, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.569, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.642, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.331, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.333, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.537, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.384, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.698, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.521, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.269, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.269, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 235}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "029bdcd136884f2cbb5ae3ea4e5a3808", "name": "Philippines 1987 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 198)", "metadata": {"country": "Philippines", "year": 1987, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Philippines lower-house election 1987, CONSTITUENCY level (198 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_cca_unido_lp_pdp_laban_lakas_ng_bans": "CCA / UNIDO / LP / PDP-Laban / Lakas ng Bansa", "votes_grand_alliance_for_democracy": "Grand Alliance for Democracy\u00a0", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_kbl_np": "KBL / NP", "votes_kabalikat_ng_bayan_sa_kaunlaran": "Kabalikat ng Bayan sa Kaunlaran\u00a0", "votes_kilusang_bagong_lipunan": "Kilusang Bagong Lipunan\u00a0", "votes_lakas_ng_bansa": "Lakas ng Bansa", "votes_lakas_ng_bansa_independent": "Lakas ng Bansa (Independent)", "votes_lakas_ng_bansa_lp": "Lakas ng Bansa / LP", "votes_lakas_ng_bansa_panaghuisa": "Lakas ng Bansa / Panaghuisa", "votes_lakas_ng_bansa_unido": "Lakas ng Bansa / UNIDO", "votes_lakas_ng_bayan": "Lakas ng Bayan", "votes_lapiang_bagong_lakas_ng_nueva_ecija": "Lapiang Bagong Lakas Ng Nueva Ecija\u00a0", "votes_np_gad": "NP / GAD", "votes_np_gad_kbl": "NP / GAD / KBL", "votes_national_union_of_christian_democrat": "National Union of Christian Democrats", "votes_pdp_laban": "PDP-Laban", "votes_pdp_laban_independent": "PDP-Laban (Independent)", "votes_pdp_laban_lakas_ng_bansa": "PDP-Laban / Lakas ng Bansa", "votes_pdp_laban_lakas_ng_bansa_lp_salonga_": "PDP-Laban / Lakas ng Bansa / LP (Salonga Wing)", "votes_pdp_laban_lakas_ng_bansa_unido": "PDP-Laban / Lakas ng Bansa / UNIDO", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas_kalaw_w": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas (Kalaw Wing)", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas_salonga": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas (Salonga Wing)", "votes_partido_nacionalista": "Partido Nacionalista", "votes_partido_panaghiusa": "Partido Panaghiusa", "votes_partido_ng_bayan": "Partido ng Bayan", "votes_united_nationalist_democratic_organi": "United Nationalist Democratic Organization", "votes_united_nationalist_democra_2": "United Nationalist Democratic Organization (Independent)", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 198, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 198, "cast_gt_registered": 196}, "n_stations_flagged": 198, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:21:58.008493", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.329, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.825, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.431, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.273, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.329, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.104, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.014, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 1987, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.056, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.545, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.386, "year": 1987, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.089, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.522, "year": 1987, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.431, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 1987, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.24, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.24, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.77, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "KBL", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "PDP-Laban", "margin": 7.53, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "PHL", "year": 1986, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 198}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "46dfd5e28a5e49c984c4744b39c519de", "name": "Philippines 1969 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 110)", "metadata": {"country": "Philippines", "year": 1969, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Philippines lower-house election 1969, CONSTITUENCY level (110 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_994": "-994", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_lc_np_lp_independent": "LC / NP / LP / Independent", "votes_np_lp": "NP / LP", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas_indepen": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas (Independent)", "votes_partido_nacionalista": "Partido Nacionalista", "votes_partido_nacionalista_independent": "Partido Nacionalista (Independent)", "votes_partido_nacionalista_indep_2": "Partido Nacionalista\u00a0 (Independent)", "votes_progressive_party_of_the_philippines": "Progressive Party of the Philippines", "votes_rpp": "RPP", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_youth_party": "Youth Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 110, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 110, "cast_gt_registered": 109}, "n_stations_flagged": 110, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:21:52.474806", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.205, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.885, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.387, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.269, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.205, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 1969, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 1969, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.576, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 1969, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.182, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.727, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 1969, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.239, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.019, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 1969, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 1969, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.269, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.269, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.156, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.156, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.495, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.495, "year": 1969, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 1969, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.707, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.707, "year": 1969, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 110}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "840cfa42734f4d778d422203e1e6a017", "name": "Philippines 1965 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 103)", "metadata": {"country": "Philippines", "year": 1965, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Philippines lower-house election 1965, CONSTITUENCY level (103 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_free_front": "Free Front", "votes_free_party": "Free Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_lp_np": "LP / NP", "votes_np_lp": "NP / LP", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas_indepen": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas (Independent)", "votes_partido_nacionalista": "Partido Nacionalista", "votes_partido_nacionalista_independent": "Partido Nacionalista (Independent)", "votes_progressive_party_of_the_philippines": "Progressive Party of the Philippines", "votes_republican_party_independent": "Republican Party (Independent)", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_yp_np_lp": "YP / NP / LP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 103, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 103, "cast_gt_registered": 103}, "n_stations_flagged": 103, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:21:49.124372", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.776, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.589, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.404, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.288, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.776, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 1965, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.725, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.372, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.343, "year": 1965, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.727, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 1965, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.239, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.869, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 1965, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 1965, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.288, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.161, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.161, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.53, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.53, "year": 1965, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.72, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.72, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": null, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PHL", "year": 1965, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 103}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e81f5fdc1330497f87f1fa803df63f59", "name": "Philippines 1961 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 104)", "metadata": {"country": "Philippines", "year": 1961, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Philippines lower-house election 1961, CONSTITUENCY level (104 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_lapiang_manggagawa": "Lapiang Manggagawa\u00a0", "votes_np_lp_independent_voters_faction": "NP / LP (Independent Voters Faction)", "votes_np_lp_united_opposition": "NP / LP (United Opposition)", "votes_np_ncp": "NP / NCP", "votes_nationalist_citizens_party": "Nationalist Citizens' Party", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas_indepen": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas (Independent)", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas_pro_fil": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas (Pro-Filipino Wing)", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas_united_": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas (United Opposition)", "votes_partido_nacionalista": "Partido Nacionalista", "votes_partido_nacionalista_independent": "Partido Nacionalista (Independent)", "votes_partido_nacionalista_rodriguez_wing": "Partido Nacionalista (Rodriguez Wing)", "votes_progressive_party_of_the_philippines": "Progressive Party of the Philippines", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 104, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 104, "registered_not_positive": 104}, "n_stations_flagged": 104, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:21:46.068533", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.8, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.59, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.399, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.293, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.8, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 1961, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.109, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 1961, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.383, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.346, "year": 1961, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.793, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.698, "year": 1961, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.239, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 1961, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.399, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.399, "year": 1961, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.293, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.293, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.159, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.159, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.557, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 1961, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 1961, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.719, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 1961, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": null, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PHL", "year": 1961, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 104}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8b9ae7f45189484a8799793e08dd7978", "name": "Philippines 1957 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 102)", "metadata": {"country": "Philippines", "year": 1957, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Philippines lower-house election 1957, CONSTITUENCY level (102 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democratic_party": "Democratic Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_lapiang_makabansa": "Lapiang Makabansa", "votes_liberal_socialist_democratic_party": "Liberal Socialist Democratic Party", "votes_liga_n_l": "Liga N-L", "votes_national_patriotic_party": "National Patriotic Party", "votes_nationalist_citizens_party": "Nationalist Citizens' Party", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas_indepen": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas (Independent)", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas_quirino": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas (Quirino Wing)", "votes_partido_nacionalista": "Partido Nacionalista", "votes_partido_nacionalista_gpm": "Partido Nacionalista (GPM)", "votes_partido_nacionalista_independent": "Partido Nacionalista (Independent)", "votes_partido_nacionalista_pro": "Partido Nacionalista (PRO)", "votes_partido_y_mahirap": "Partido'y Mahirap", "votes_philippine_veterans_party": "Philippine Veterans Party", "votes_progressive_party_of_the_philippines": "Progressive Party of the Philippines", "votes_united_rural_community_party": "United Rural Community Party", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_volunteers_for_popular_democracy": "Volunteers for Popular Democracy"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 102, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 102, "cast_gt_registered": 102}, "n_stations_flagged": 102, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:21:42.983901", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.778, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.694, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.376, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.279, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 1957, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.694, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.138, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 1957, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.536, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.384, "year": 1957, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.691, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.673, "year": 1957, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.239, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.377, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.344, "year": 1957, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.376, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.376, "year": 1957, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.279, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.279, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.148, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.148, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 1957, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 1957, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 1957, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.719, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 1957, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": null, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PHL", "year": 1957, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 102}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dbd90b5189a94594916dcd7a6072efb8", "name": "Philippines 1953 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 100)", "metadata": {"country": "Philippines", "year": 1953, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Philippines lower-house election 1953, CONSTITUENCY level (100 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_citizen_s_party": "Citizen's Party", "votes_democratic_party": "Democratic Party", "votes_democratic_party_lp": "Democratic Party / LP", "votes_democratic_party_2": "Democratic party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_np_dpp": "NP / DPP", "votes_np_democratic_party": "NP / Democratic Party", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas_indepen": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas (Independent)", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas_wing": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas (Wing)", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipin_2": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas\u00a0", "votes_partido_nacionalista": "Partido Nacionalista", "votes_partido_nacionalista_farmers_labors_": "Partido Nacionalista (Farmers Labors Block)", "votes_partido_nacionalista_independent": "Partido Nacionalista (Independent)", "votes_partido_ng_bayan": "Partido ng Bayan", "votes_republican_party": "Republican Party", "votes_the_new_young_philippines_party": "The New Young Philippines Party", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_yp_lp": "YP / LP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 100, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 100, "registered_not_positive": 100}, "n_stations_flagged": 100, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:21:39.632563", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.781, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.863, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.349, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.264, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 1953, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 1953, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.288, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.322, "year": 1953, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.691, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.673, "year": 1953, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.239, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.38, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.345, "year": 1953, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.349, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.349, "year": 1953, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.264, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.264, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.138, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.138, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.527, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 1953, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 1953, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 1953, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 1953, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": null, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PHL", "year": 1953, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 100}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e004ad98b6ea4e55a6fe04bdb88f94be", "name": "Philippines 1949 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 100)", "metadata": {"country": "Philippines", "year": 1949, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Philippines lower-house election 1949, CONSTITUENCY level (100 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_christian_democratic_party": "Christian Democratic Party", "votes_citizen_s_party": "Citizen's Party", "votes_collectivista_party": "Collectivista Party", "votes_democratic_party": "Democratic Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas_alp": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas (ALP)", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas_avelino": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas (Avelino Wing)", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas_indepen": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas (Independent)", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas_quirino": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas (Quirino Wing)", "votes_partido_nacionalista": "Partido Nacionalista", "votes_partido_nacionalista_independent": "Partido Nacionalista (Independent)", "votes_partido_ng_bayan": "Partido ng Bayan", "votes_transcedental_ethico_rational_and_et": "Transcedental Ethico-Rational and Ethico-Religious", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 100, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 100, "cast_gt_registered": 100}, "n_stations_flagged": 100, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:21:36.539436", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.394, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.696, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.347, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.261, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.394, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 1949, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.696, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.929, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1949, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.283, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.321, "year": 1949, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.691, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.673, "year": 1949, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.239, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 1949, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.347, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.347, "year": 1949, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.261, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.261, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.134, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.523, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.523, "year": 1949, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 1949, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 1949, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.683, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.683, "year": 1949, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": null, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PHL", "year": 1949, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 100}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2849dc78723a4fdaa2e2a6671bb6c921", "name": "Papua New Guinea 2017 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 111)", "metadata": {"country": "Papua New Guinea", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Papua New Guinea lower-house election 2017, CONSTITUENCY level (111 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_christian_democratic_party": "Christian Democratic Party", "votes_coalition_for_reform_party": "Coalition for Reform Party", "votes_grassroots_united_front_party": "Grassroots United Front Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_melanesian_alliance_party": "Melanesian Alliance Party", "votes_model_nation_party": "Model Nation Party", "votes_national_alliance": "National Alliance", "votes_new_generation_party": "New Generation Party", "votes_our_development_party": "Our Development Party", "votes_png_constitutional_democratic_party": "PNG Constitutional Democratic Party", "votes_png_country_party": "PNG Country Party", "votes_png_first_party": "PNG First Party", "votes_png_national_party": "PNG National Party", "votes_png_one_nation_party": "PNG One Nation Party", "votes_png_party": "PNG Party", "votes_png_socialist_party": "PNG Socialist Party", "votes_png_youths_party": "PNG Youths Party", "votes_papua_and_niugini_union_pati": "Papua and Niugini Union Pati", "votes_people_s_action_party": "People\u2019s Action Party", "votes_people_s_democratic_movement": "People\u2019s Democratic Movement", "votes_people_s_labour_party": "People\u2019s Labour Party", "votes_people_s_movement_for_change_party": "People\u2019s Movement for Change Party", "votes_people_s_national_congress_party": "People\u2019s National Congress Party", "votes_people_s_party": "People\u2019s Party", "votes_people_s_progress_party": "People\u2019s Progress Party", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party", "votes_triumph_heritage_empowerment_party": "Triumph Heritage Empowerment Party", "votes_trust_png_party": "Trust PNG Party", "votes_united_party": "United Party", "votes_united_resources_party": "United Resources Party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 111, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 109, "registered_not_positive": 111}, "n_stations_flagged": 111, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:21:34.047385", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.632, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.707, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.447, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.344, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.632, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.707, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.591, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.124, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.431, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.608, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.504, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.376, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.447, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.447, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.344, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.344, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.249, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.702, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 111}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "287b5bde11254e29a2f99b7d9dd62d5b", "name": "Papua New Guinea 2012 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 111)", "metadata": {"country": "Papua New Guinea", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Papua New Guinea lower-house election 2012, CONSTITUENCY level (111 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_christian_democratic_party": "Christian Democratic Party", "votes_coalition_for_reform_party": "Coalition for Reform Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_indigenous_people_s_party": "Indigenous People\u2019s Party", "votes_league_for_democracy_party": "League for Democracy Party", "votes_melanesian_alliance_party": "Melanesian Alliance Party", "votes_melanesian_liberal_party": "Melanesian Liberal Party", "votes_national_alliance": "National Alliance", "votes_new_dawn_transformation_party": "New Dawn Transformation Party", "votes_new_generation_party": "New Generation Party", "votes_our_development_party": "Our Development Party", "votes_png_constitutional_democratic_party": "PNG Constitutional Democratic Party", "votes_png_country_party": "PNG Country Party", "votes_png_labour_party": "PNG Labour Party", "votes_png_national_party": "PNG National Party", "votes_png_party": "PNG Party", "votes_papua_and_niugini_union_pati": "Papua and Niugini Union Pati", "votes_people_s_democratic_movement": "People\u2019s Democratic Movement", "votes_people_s_freedom_party": "People\u2019s Freedom Party", "votes_people_s_labour_party": "People\u2019s Labour Party", "votes_people_s_movement_for_change_party": "People\u2019s Movement for Change Party", "votes_people_s_national_congress_party": "People\u2019s National Congress Party", "votes_people_s_party": "People\u2019s Party", "votes_people_s_progress_party": "People\u2019s Progress Party", "votes_people_s_united_assembly_party": "People\u2019s United Assembly Party", "votes_pipol_first_party": "Pipol First Party", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party", "votes_stars_alliance_party": "Stars Alliance Party", "votes_triumph_heritage_empowerment_party": "Triumph Heritage Empowerment Party", "votes_united_resources_party": "United Resources Party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 111, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 105, "registered_not_positive": 111, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 111, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:21:30.265830", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.625, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.673, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.46, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.354, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.625, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.406, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.405, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.101, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.431, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.608, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.599, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.785, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.446, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.46, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.46, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.354, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.354, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.258, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.258, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.667, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 111}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b374478218504a179a8e67c1ecc034f2", "name": "Papua New Guinea 2002 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 109)", "metadata": {"country": "Papua New Guinea", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Papua New Guinea lower-house election 2002, CONSTITUENCY level (109 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_advance_png_party": "Advance PNG Party", "votes_christian_democratic_party": "Christian Democratic Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_melanesian_alliance_party": "Melanesian Alliance Party", "votes_melanesian_labour_party": "Melanesian Labour Party", "votes_melanesian_people_s_party": "Melanesian People\u2019s Party", "votes_nation_transformation_party": "Nation Transformation Party", "votes_national_alliance": "National Alliance", "votes_national_front_party": "National Front Party", "votes_national_vision_for_humanity_party": "National Vision for Humanity Party", "votes_one_people_party": "One People Party", "votes_png_country_party": "PNG Country Party", "votes_png_labour_party": "PNG Labour Party", "votes_png_national_party": "PNG National Party", "votes_png_revival_party": "PNG Revival Party", "votes_pan_melanesian_congress_party": "Pan Melanesian Congress Party", "votes_papua_and_niugini_union_pati": "Papua and Niugini Union Pati", "votes_party_for_justice_and_dignity": "Party for Justice and Dignity", "votes_people_s_action_party": "People\u2019s Action Party", "votes_people_s_democratic_movement": "People\u2019s Democratic Movement", "votes_people_s_freedom_party": "People\u2019s Freedom Party", "votes_people_s_heritage_party": "People\u2019s Heritage Party", "votes_people_s_labour_party": "People\u2019s Labour Party", "votes_people_s_national_congress_party": "People\u2019s National Congress Party", "votes_people_s_progress_party": "People\u2019s Progress Party", "votes_people_s_solidarity_party": "People\u2019s Solidarity Party", "votes_pipol_first_party": "Pipol First Party", "votes_rural_pipol_s_pati": "Rural Pipol\u2019s Pati", "votes_true_peoples_party": "True Peoples Party", "votes_united_party": "United Party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 109, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 109, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1, "cast_gt_registered": 103}, "n_stations_flagged": 109, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:21:27.688115", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.996, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.54, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.415, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.796, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.047, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.262, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.436, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.483, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.415, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.302, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.302, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 109}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "77ecb04435054aae9f03e2981191cc72", "name": "Papua New Guinea 1997 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 109)", "metadata": {"country": "Papua New Guinea", "year": 1997, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Papua New Guinea lower-house election 1997, CONSTITUENCY level (109 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_990": "-990", "votes_ccp": "CCP", "votes_christian_democratic_party": "Christian Democratic Party", "votes_hp": "HP", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_liberal_party": "Liberal Party", "votes_mbp": "MBP", "votes_mga": "MGA", "votes_melanesian_alliance_party": "Melanesian Alliance Party", "votes_melanesian_labour_party": "Melanesian Labour Party", "votes_national_alliance": "National Alliance", "votes_png_first_party": "PNG First Party", "votes_png_national_party": "PNG National Party", "votes_pngna": "PNGNA", "votes_people_s_action_party": "People\u2019s Action Party", "votes_people_s_democratic_movement": "People\u2019s Democratic Movement", "votes_people_s_national_congress_party": "People\u2019s National Congress Party", "votes_people_s_party": "People\u2019s Party", "votes_people_s_progress_party": "People\u2019s Progress Party", "votes_people_s_resources_awareness_party": "People\u2019s Resources Awareness Party", "votes_people_s_solidarity_party": "People\u2019s Solidarity Party", "votes_people_s_unity_party": "People\u2019s Unity Party", "votes_united_party": "United Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 109, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 41, "registered_not_positive": 109, "cast_gt_registered": 109}, "n_stations_flagged": 109, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:21:24.091003", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.846, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.979, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.538, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.414, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.979, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.641, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.238, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.436, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.4, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.538, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.414, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.414, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.299, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.299, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 109}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "84d049125f2e42cda8481f52e20f7d86", "name": "Papua New Guinea 1987 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 109)", "metadata": {"country": "Papua New Guinea", "year": 1987, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Papua New Guinea lower-house election 1987, CONSTITUENCY level (109 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_990": "-990", "votes_country_party": "Country Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_lan": "LAN", "votes_league_for_national_advancement": "League for National Advancement", "votes_leiba_party": "Leiba Party", "votes_melanesian_alliance_party": "Melanesian Alliance Party", "votes_morobe_independent_group": "Morobe Independent Group", "votes_national_party": "National Party", "votes_papua_besena": "Papua Besena", "votes_papua_and_niugini_union_pati": "Papua and Niugini Union Pati", "votes_people_s_action_party": "People\u2019s Action Party", "votes_people_s_democratic_movement": "People\u2019s Democratic Movement", "votes_people_s_party": "People\u2019s Party", "votes_people_s_progress_party": "People\u2019s Progress Party", "votes_united_party": "United Party", "votes_wantok_party": "Wantok Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 109, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 109, "cast_gt_registered": 107}, "n_stations_flagged": 109, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:21:20.725805", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.832, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.976, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.563, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.432, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.976, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.638, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.554, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.389, "year": 1987, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.436, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 1987, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 1987, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.383, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.596, "year": 1987, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.563, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 1987, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.432, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.432, "year": 1987, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.307, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.307, "year": 1987, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.818, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 1987, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 109}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "894a701b6b8544a29f2ea80cb04855b0", "name": "Papua New Guinea 1982 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 109)", "metadata": {"country": "Papua New Guinea", "year": 1982, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Papua New Guinea lower-house election 1982, CONSTITUENCY level (109 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_990": "-990"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 109, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 108, "cast_valid_mismatch": 108, "registered_not_positive": 109}, "n_stations_flagged": 109, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:21:17.320000", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.816, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.984, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.573, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.437, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 1982, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.984, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 1982, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.676, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.563, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.391, "year": 1982, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.436, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 1982, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 1982, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.383, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.596, "year": 1982, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 1982, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.437, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 1982, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.312, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.312, "year": 1982, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.818, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 1982, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 1982, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 1982, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 1982, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 109}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e4e33edce040431582fe7b3b439e464a", "name": "Papua New Guinea 1977 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 109)", "metadata": {"country": "Papua New Guinea", "year": 1977, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Papua New Guinea lower-house election 1977, CONSTITUENCY level (109 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_990": "-990"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 109, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 104, "cast_valid_mismatch": 104, "registered_not_positive": 109}, "n_stations_flagged": 109, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:21:14.841142", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.846, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.971, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.584, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.445, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 1977, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.971, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 1977, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.69, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 1977, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.574, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 1977, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.436, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 1977, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 1977, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 1977, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.584, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 1977, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.445, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 1977, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.317, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.317, "year": 1977, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.823, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 1977, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 1977, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 1977, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 1977, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 109}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "571cbed3f5b3451d84d9019fddac83f5", "name": "Papua New Guinea 1972 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 100)", "metadata": {"country": "Papua New Guinea", "year": 1972, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Papua New Guinea lower-house election 1972, CONSTITUENCY level (100 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_990": "-990", "votes_994": "-994"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 100, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 97, "registered_not_positive": 100, "cast_gt_registered": 97}, "n_stations_flagged": 100, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:21:12.103581", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.195, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.976, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.317, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.249, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.195, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.976, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.052, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.513, "year": 1972, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.436, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 1972, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 1972, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.419, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 1972, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.317, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.317, "year": 1972, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.249, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.13, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.13, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.6, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 1972, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 1972, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.651, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 1972, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 100}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1421d26328964f6291f013ab6e835aa1", "name": "Pakistan 2018 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 273)", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Pakistan lower-house election 2018 (7.0), CONSTITUENCY level (273 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_pakistan_muslim_league": "All Pakistan Muslim League", "votes_allah_o_akbar_tehreek": "Allah-o-Akbar Tehreek", "votes_awami_muslim_league_pakistan": "Awami Muslim League Pakistan", "votes_awami_national_party": "Awami National Party", "votes_balochistan_awami_party": "Balochistan Awami Party", "votes_balochistan_national_party": "Balochistan National Party", "votes_balochistan_national_party_awami": "Balochistan National Party (Awami)", "votes_grand_democratic_alliance": "Grand Democratic Alliance", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jamiat_ulama_e_islam_s": "Jamiat Ulama-e-Islam (S)", "votes_jamiat_ulma_e_islam_nazryati": "Jamiat Ulma-e-Islam(Nazryati)", "votes_mutahidda_qabail_party": "Mutahidda Qabail Party", "votes_muttahida_majlis_e_amal_pakistan": "Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal Pakistan", "votes_muttahida_qaumi_movement_pakistan": "Muttahida Qaumi Movement Pakistan", "votes_national_party": "National Party", "votes_pak_sarzameen_party": "Pak Sarzameen Party", "votes_pakistan_awami_raj": "Pakistan Awami Raj", "votes_pakistan_human_party": "Pakistan Human Party", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league": "Pakistan Muslim League", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_f": "Pakistan Muslim League (F)", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_n": "Pakistan Muslim League (N)", "votes_pakistan_national_muslim_league": "Pakistan National Muslim League", "votes_pakistan_peoples_party_parliamentari": "Pakistan Peoples Party Parliamentarians", "votes_pakistan_rah_e_haq_party": "Pakistan Rah-e-Haq Party", "votes_pakistan_tehreek_e_insaf": "Pakistan Tehreek-E-Insaf", "votes_pashtoonkhwa_milli_awami_party": "Pashtoonkhwa Milli Awami Party", "votes_qaumi_watan_party": "Qaumi Watan Party", "votes_sindh_united_party": "Sindh United Party", "votes_tehreek_labbaik_pakistan": "Tehreek Labbaik Pakistan", "votes_tehreek_e_labbaik_islam": "Tehreek-e-Labbaik Islam", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 273, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 12, "registered_not_positive": 2, "cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 14, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:21:09.060702", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.98, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.493, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.395, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.25, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.98, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.495, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.493, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.104, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.526, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.159, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.869, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.435, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.25, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.25, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.134, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 273}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e555aeb8521142f8a38b7f1301567848", "name": "Pakistan 2013 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 277)", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Pakistan lower-house election 2013, CONSTITUENCY level (277 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_awami_jamhuri_ittehad_pakistan": "Awami Jamhuri Ittehad Pakistan", "votes_awami_muslim_league_pakistan": "Awami Muslim League Pakistan", "votes_awami_national_party": "Awami National Party", "votes_bahawalpur_national_awami_party": "Bahawalpur National Awami Party", "votes_balochistan_national_party": "Balochistan National Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jamaat_e_islami_pakistan": "Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan", "votes_jamiat_ulama_e_islam_nazryati_pakist": "Jamiat Ulama-e-Islam Nazryati Pakistan", "votes_jamiat_ulema_e_pakistan_noorani": "Jamiat Ulema-e-Pakistan (Noorani)", "votes_jamiat_e_ulema_e_islam_fazal_ur_rehm": "Jamiat-e-Ulema-e-Islam (Fazal-ur-Rehman Group)", "votes_majlis_e_wahdat_e_muslimeen_pakistan": "Majlis-e-Wahdat-e-Muslimeen Pakistan", "votes_mutahida_deeni_mahaz": "Mutahida Deeni Mahaz", "votes_national_party": "National Party", "votes_national_peoples_party": "National Peoples Party", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league": "Pakistan Muslim League", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_f": "Pakistan Muslim League (F)", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_j": "Pakistan Muslim League (J)", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_n": "Pakistan Muslim League (N)", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_z": "Pakistan Muslim League (Z)", "votes_pakistan_national_muslim_league": "Pakistan National Muslim League", "votes_pakistan_peoples_party_shaheed_bhutt": "Pakistan Peoples Party (Shaheed Bhutto)", "votes_pakistan_peoples_party_parliamentari": "Pakistan Peoples Party Parliamentarians", "votes_pakistan_tehreek_e_insaf": "Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf", "votes_pakistan_tehreek_e_insaf_2": "Pakistan Tehreek-e-insaf", "votes_qoumi_wattan_party": "Qoumi Wattan Party", "votes_sindh_united_party": "Sindh United Party", "votes_tehreek_e_suba_hazara": "Tehreek-e-Suba Hazara", "votes_tehreek_e_tahaffuze_pakistan": "Tehreek-e-Tahaffuze Pakistan", "votes_muttahida_qaumi_movement_pakistan": "muttahida qaumi movement pakistan", "votes_pakistan_pakhtoonkhawa_milli_awami_p": "pakistan pakhtoonkhawa milli awami party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 277, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 10, "cast_valid_mismatch": 28, "cast_gt_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 38, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:21:05.801904", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.358, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.045, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.47, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.285, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.358, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.045, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.511, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.657, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.664, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.285, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.25, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.734, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.433, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.47, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.47, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.285, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.285, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.155, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.155, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.73, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.73, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 277}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6b1ac999d5fa4451af8dab29d3b55975", "name": "Pakistan 1997 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 208)", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 1997, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Pakistan lower-house election 1997 (2.0), CONSTITUENCY level (208 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_awami_national_party": "Awami National Party", "votes_balochistan_national_movement": "Balochistan National Movement", "votes_balochistan_national_party": "Balochistan National Party", "votes_christian_liberation_front_of_pakist": "Christian Liberation Front of Pakistan", "votes_haq_parast_group": "Haq Parast Group", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jamhoori_wattan_party": "Jamhoori Wattan Party", "votes_jamiat_ulema_e_islam_s": "Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (S)", "votes_jamiat_e_ulema_e_islam_fazal_ur_rehm": "Jamiat-e-Ulema-e-Islam (Fazal-ur-Rehman Group)", "votes_muhajir_qaumi_movement_haqiqi": "Muhajir Qaumi Movement (Haqiqi)", "votes_muslim_ittehad_pakistan": "Muslim Ittehad Pakistan", "votes_national_peoples_party": "National Peoples Party", "votes_pml_j": "PML (J)", "votes_ppp": "PPP", "votes_pakhtunkhwa_milli_awami_party": "Pakhtunkhwa Milli Awami Party", "votes_pakistan_awami_party": "Pakistan Awami Party", "votes_pakistan_christian_association": "Pakistan Christian Association", "votes_pakistan_democratic_party": "Pakistan Democratic Party", "votes_pakistan_muhafiz_party": "Pakistan Muhafiz Party", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league": "Pakistan Muslim League", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_j_chataha_gro": "Pakistan Muslim League (J) (Chataha Group)", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_n": "Pakistan Muslim League (N)", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_q": "Pakistan Muslim League (Q)", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_j": "Pakistan Muslim League(J)", "votes_pakistan_people_party": "Pakistan People Party", "votes_pakistan_peoples_party_shaheed_bhutt": "Pakistan Peoples Party (Shaheed Bhutto)", "votes_pakistan_peoples_party_z_a_bhutto": "Pakistan Peoples Party (Z.A. Bhutto)", "votes_pakistan_tehreek_e_insaf": "Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf", "votes_pashtunkhwa_milli_awami_party": "Pashtunkhwa Milli Awami Party", "votes_united_national_alliance": "United National Alliance", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 208, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 6, "registered_not_positive": 2, "cast_gt_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:21:03.086044", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.321, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.63, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.386, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.196, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.321, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.58, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.63, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.657, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.965, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.702, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.175, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.47, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.297, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.386, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.386, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.196, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.196, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.139, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.139, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.49, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.49, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.412, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.629, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.629, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 208}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "83c5e4ef095241ef8cd28dbf9a6749ea", "name": "Pakistan 1990 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 211)", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 1990, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Pakistan lower-house election 1990, CONSTITUENCY level (211 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_awami_national_party": "Awami National Party", "votes_awami_tehreek_paleejo_group": "Awami Tehreek (Paleejo Group)", "votes_haq_parast_group": "Haq Parast Group", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_islami_jamhoori_ittehad": "Islami Jamhoori Ittehad", "votes_jamaat_e_ahl_e_sunnat_pakistan": "Jamaat-e-Ahl-e-Sunnat Pakistan", "votes_jamhoori_wattan_party": "Jamhoori Wattan Party", "votes_jamiat_ulema_e_pakistan_noorani": "Jamiat Ulema-e-Pakistan (Noorani)", "votes_jamiat_e_ulema_e_islam_fazal_ur_rehm": "Jamiat-e-Ulema-e-Islam (Fazal-ur-Rehman Group)", "votes_pakistan_aqiliati_ittehad": "Pakistan Aqiliati Ittehad", "votes_pakistan_awami_tehreek": "Pakistan Awami Tehreek", "votes_pakistan_christian_association": "Pakistan Christian Association", "votes_pakistan_christian_congress": "Pakistan Christian Congress", "votes_pakistan_democratic_party": "Pakistan Democratic Party", "votes_pakistan_hindu_party": "Pakistan Hindu Party", "votes_pakistan_masihi_ittehad": "Pakistan Masihi Ittehad", "votes_pakistan_masihi_party": "Pakistan Masihi Party", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_qaiyum_group": "Pakistan Muslim League (Qaiyum Group)", "votes_pakistan_national_party": "Pakistan National Party", "votes_pakistan_united_christian_front": "Pakistan United Christian Front", "votes_peoples_democratic_alliance": "Peoples Democratic Alliance", "votes_punjabi_pukhtoon_ittehad_mir_hazar_k": "Punjabi Pukhtoon Ittehad (Mir Hazar Khan)", "votes_punjabi_pukhtoon_ittehad_sarwar_awan": "Punjabi Pukhtoon Ittehad (Sarwar Awan Group)", "votes_saraiki_qaumi_ittehad": "Saraiki Qaumi Ittehad", "votes_sind_national_alliance_hamid_jatoi_g": "Sind National Alliance (Hamid Jatoi Group)", "votes_sindh_national_front": "Sindh National Front", "votes_balochistan_national_movement": "balochistan national movement", "votes_pakistan_pakhtoonkhawa_milli_awami_p": "pakistan pakhtoonkhawa milli awami party", "votes_pakistan_seriaki_party": "pakistan seriaki party", "votes_qaumi_inqilab_party": "qaumi inqilab party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 211, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 3, "cast_valid_mismatch": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:20:59.522362", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.312, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.335, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.372, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.198, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.312, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.578, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.335, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.493, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.123, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.47, "year": 1990, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 1990, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.304, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.576, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.372, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 1990, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.198, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.134, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.486, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.486, "year": 1990, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 1990, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.611, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.611, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 211}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f504a522d3094b7d8521bab84af1b6af", "name": "Pakistan 1988 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 211)", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 1988, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Pakistan lower-house election 1988, CONSTITUENCY level (211 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_pakistan_christians_movement": "All Pakistan Christians Movement", "votes_awami_national_party": "Awami National Party", "votes_awami_national_party_ainee_group": "Awami National Party (Ainee Group)", "votes_baluchistan_national_alliance": "Baluchistan National Alliance", "votes_hazara_front_mahaz_e_hazara": "Hazara Front (Mahaz-e-Hazara)", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_islami_jamhoori_ittehad": "Islami Jamhoori Ittehad", "votes_jamaat_e_ahl_e_hadees_pakistan": "Jamaat-e-Ahl-e-Hadees Pakistan", "votes_jamaat_e_ahl_e_sunnat_pakistan": "Jamaat-e-Ahl-e-Sunnat Pakistan", "votes_jamiat_e_ulema_e_islam_darkhasti_gro": "Jamiat-e-Ulema-e-Islam (Darkhasti Group)", "votes_jamiat_e_ulema_e_islam_fazal_ur_rehm": "Jamiat-e-Ulema-e-Islam (Fazal-ur-Rehman Group)", "votes_national_democratic_party": "National Democratic Party", "votes_national_peoples_party_khar_group": "National Peoples Party (Khar Group)", "votes_pakistan_awami_ittehad": "Pakistan Awami Ittehad", "votes_pakistan_christians_national_party": "Pakistan Christians National Party", "votes_pakistan_democratic_party": "Pakistan Democratic Party", "votes_pakistan_masihi_league": "Pakistan Masihi League", "votes_pakistan_mazdoor_kissan_party": "Pakistan Mazdoor Kissan Party", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_forward_block": "Pakistan Muslim League (Forward Block)", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_malik_qasim_g": "Pakistan Muslim League (Malik Qasim Group)", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_qaiyum_group": "Pakistan Muslim League (Qaiyum Group)", "votes_pakistan_national_democratic_allianc": "Pakistan National Democratic Alliance", "votes_pakistan_national_party": "Pakistan National Party", "votes_pakistan_peoples_party": "Pakistan Peoples Party", "votes_pakistan_qaumi_mahaz_e_azadi": "Pakistan Qaumi Mahaz-e-Azadi", "votes_punjabi_pakhtoon_ittehad_sind": "Punjabi Pakhtoon Ittehad Sind", "votes_tehreek_e_inqalab_islam_pakistan": "Tehreek-e-Inqalab-Islam Pakistan", "votes_tehreek_e_nafaz_e_fiqah_e_jafria": "Tehreek-e-Nafaz-e-Fiqah-e-Jafria", "votes_united_christians_front": "United Christians Front", "votes_pakistan_pakhtoonkhawa_milli_awami_p": "pakistan pakhtoonkhawa milli awami party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 211, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 4, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:20:55.605835", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.038, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.066, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.214, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.127, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.038, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.509, "year": 1988, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.066, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.516, "year": 1988, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.779, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 1988, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.494, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.123, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.157, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 1988, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.319, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.58, "year": 1988, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.214, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.214, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.127, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.127, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.096, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.096, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.274, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.274, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.415, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 1988, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.731, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.731, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.364, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.364, "year": 1988, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 211}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cf1cbb7218724cffaeed1c40ffb9a097", "name": "Pakistan 1985 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 215)", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 1985, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Pakistan lower-house election 1985, CONSTITUENCY level (215 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_independent": "Independent"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 215, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 3, "registered_not_positive": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:20:51.843793", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.239, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.724, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.157, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.102, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.239, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.31, "year": 1985, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 1985, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.401, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.35, "year": 1985, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.647, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.162, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.61, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.152, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.378, "year": 1985, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.18, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.157, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.157, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.102, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.102, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.074, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.074, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.227, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.227, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.392, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 1985, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.637, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.637, "year": 1985, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.309, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.309, "year": 1985, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 215}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0980e75876604aac949c1b8d44843717", "name": "Pakistan 1977 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 211)", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 1977, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Pakistan lower-house election 1977, CONSTITUENCY level (211 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jamaat_e_aalia_mujahideen": "Jamaat-e-Aalia Mujahideen", "votes_jamiat_ulema_e_islam_hazarvi": "Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (Hazarvi)", "votes_pak_sarzameen_party": "Pak Sarzameen Party", "votes_pakistan_inqlabi_mahaz": "Pakistan Inqlabi Mahaz", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_q": "Pakistan Muslim League (Q)", "votes_pakistan_national_alliance": "Pakistan National Alliance", "votes_pakistan_pakhtunkhwa_national_awami_": "Pakistan Pakhtunkhwa National Awami Party", "votes_pakistan_peoples_party": "Pakistan Peoples Party", "votes_pakistan_workers_party": "Pakistan Workers Party", "votes_tehrik_e_istaqlal": "Tehrik-e-istaqlal"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 211, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 15}, "n_stations_flagged": 15, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:20:47.695121", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.123, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.741, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.218, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.113, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.123, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 1977, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.435, "year": 1977, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.591, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 1977, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.221, "year": 1977, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.169, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 1977, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.465, "year": 1977, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.303, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.576, "year": 1977, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.218, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.218, "year": 1977, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.113, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.113, "year": 1977, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.088, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.088, "year": 1977, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.369, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.369, "year": 1977, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.332, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.332, "year": 1977, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 1977, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.392, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 1977, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 211}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1e2d2f46edec477eaad07881e662daad", "name": "Pakistan 1970 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 289)", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 1970, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Pakistan lower-house election 1970, CONSTITUENCY level (289 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_pakistan_awami_league": "All Pakistan Awami League", "votes_all_pakistan_central_jamiat_ulema_e_": "All Pakistan Central Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam and Nizam-e-Islam", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_islami_gonotontri_dal": "Islami Gonotontri Dal", "votes_jamaat_e_islami_pakistan": "Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan", "votes_jamiat_ulema_e_islam_west_pakistan": "Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (West Pakistan)", "votes_jatiya_gana_mukti_dal": "Jatiya Gana Mukti Dal", "votes_khaksar_tehrik": "Khaksar Tehrik", "votes_krishak_sramik_party": "Krishak Sramik Party", "votes_markazi_jamiat_e_ahle_hadees_pakista": "Markazi Jamiat-e-Ahle-Hadees Pakistan", "votes_markazi_jamiat_ul_ulema_pakistan": "Markazi Jamiat-ul-Ulema Pakistan", "votes_national_awami_party_bhashani_group": "National Awami Party (Bhashani Group)", "votes_pakistan_democratic_party": "Pakistan Democratic Party", "votes_pakistan_masihi_league": "Pakistan Masihi League", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_convention": "Pakistan Muslim League (Convention)", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_council": "Pakistan Muslim League (Council)", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_qayyum": "Pakistan Muslim League (Qayyum)", "votes_pakistan_national_awami_party_wali_k": "Pakistan National Awami Party (Wali Khan Group)", "votes_pakistan_national_congress": "Pakistan National Congress", "votes_pakistan_national_league": "Pakistan National League", "votes_pakistans_peoples_party": "Pakistans Peoples Party", "votes_sindh_united_front": "Sindh United Front", "votes_sindh_karachi_mohajir_punjabi_pathan": "Sindh-Karachi Mohajir Punjabi-Pathan Mutahida Mahaz"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 289, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 6, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 7, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:20:43.518731", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.34, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.979, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.192, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.095, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.34, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 1970, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.979, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.495, "year": 1970, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.532, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.998, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.499, "year": 1970, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.211, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.465, "year": 1970, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.125, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.531, "year": 1970, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.192, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.192, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.095, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.095, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.078, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.078, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.437, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 1970, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 1970, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 1970, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.533, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.533, "year": 1970, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 289}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "49caa332b1e74e99aadc27141259c0d6", "name": "Nigeria 2019 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 359)", "metadata": {"country": "Nigeria", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Nigeria lower-house election 2019, CONSTITUENCY level (359 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_accord": "Accord", "votes_action_alliance": "Action Alliance", "votes_action_democratic_party": "Action Democratic Party", "votes_advanced_congress_of_democrats": "Advanced Congress of Democrats", "votes_advanced_popular_democratic_alliance": "Advanced Popular Democratic Alliance", "votes_african_action_congress": "African Action Congress", "votes_african_democratic_congress": "African Democratic Congress", "votes_all_progressives_congress": "All Progressives Congress", "votes_all_progressives_grand_alliance": "All Progressives Grand Alliance", "votes_alliance_for_democracy": "Alliance for Democracy", "votes_alliance_for_new_nigeria": "Alliance for New Nigeria", "votes_allied_congress_party_of_nigeria": "Allied Congress Party of Nigeria", "votes_allied_peoples_movement": "Allied Peoples Movement", "votes_democratic_peoples_party": "Democratic Peoples Party", "votes_green_party_of_nigeria": "Green Party of Nigeria", "votes_kowa_party": "Kowa Party", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_mega_party_of_nigeria": "Mega Party of Nigeria", "votes_national_conscience_party": "National Conscience Party", "votes_national_rescue_movement": "National Rescue Movement", "votes_new_nigeria_peoples_party": "New Nigeria Peoples Party", "votes_peoples_coalition_party": "Peoples Coalition Party", "votes_peoples_democratic_party": "Peoples Democratic Party", "votes_peoples_party_of_nigeria": "Peoples Party of Nigeria", "votes_peoples_redemption_party": "Peoples Redemption Party", "votes_providence_people_s_congress": "Providence People's Congress", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party", "votes_united_democratic_party": "United Democratic Party", "votes_young_progressive_party": "Young Progressive Party", "votes_zenith_labour_party": "Zenith Labour Party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 359, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 355, "registered_not_positive": 359}, "n_stations_flagged": 359, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:20:39.844644", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.44, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.148, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.52, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.36, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.44, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.148, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.461, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.159, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.29, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.254, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.314, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.628, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.407, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.52, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.52, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.36, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.36, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.292, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 359}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8bd9361aa7544ff393567124ac6bcf09", "name": "Nigeria 2015 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 358)", "metadata": {"country": "Nigeria", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Nigeria lower-house election 2015, CONSTITUENCY level (358 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_990": "-990", "votes_accord_party": "Accord Party", "votes_action_alliance": "Action Alliance", "votes_advanced_congress_of_democrats": "Advanced Congress of Democrats", "votes_african_democratic_congress": "African Democratic Congress", "votes_african_people_s_alliance": "African People's Alliance", "votes_all_progressives_congress": "All Progressives Congress", "votes_all_progressives_grand_alliance": "All Progressives Grand Alliance", "votes_alliance_for_democracy": "Alliance for Democracy", "votes_allied_congress_party": "Allied Congress Party", "votes_allied_congress_party_of_nigeria": "Allied Congress Party of Nigeria", "votes_citizens_popular_party": "Citizens Popular Party", "votes_democratic_people_s_party": "Democratic People's Party", "votes_independent_democrats": "Independent Democrats", "votes_kowa_party": "Kowa Party", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_mega_progressives_people_s_party": "Mega Progressives People's Party", "votes_national_conscience_party": "National Conscience Party", "votes_new_nigeria_people_s_party": "New Nigeria People's Party", "votes_people_for_democratic_change": "People for Democratic Change", "votes_people_s_democratic_party": "People's Democratic Party", "votes_people_s_party_of_nigeria": "People's Party of Nigeria", "votes_peoples_democratic_movement": "Peoples Democratic Movement", "votes_progressive_people_s_alliance": "Progressive People's Alliance", "votes_providence_people_s_congress": "Providence People's Congress", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party", "votes_united_democratic_party": "United Democratic Party", "votes_united_party_of_nigeria": "United Party of Nigeria", "votes_united_progressive_party": "United Progressive Party", "votes_urhobo_progress_union": "Urhobo Progress Union", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 358, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 358, "cast_gt_registered": 357}, "n_stations_flagged": 358, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:20:36.298567", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.65, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.342, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.554, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.401, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.662, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.342, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.517, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.629, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.458, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.248, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.325, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.997, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.499, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.554, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.554, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.401, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.401, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.308, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.308, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.637, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.637, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "All Progressives Congress (APC)", "winner_candidate": "Muhammadu Buhari", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "People's Democratic Party (PDP)", "margin": 9.0, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "NGA", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 358}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5b19442eea394a359f67f399e857305d", "name": "Nigeria 2011 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 360)", "metadata": {"country": "Nigeria", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Nigeria lower-house election 2011, CONSTITUENCY level (360 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_accord": "Accord", "votes_action_congress_of_nigeria": "Action Congress of Nigeria", "votes_african_democratic_congress": "African Democratic Congress", "votes_african_liberation_party": "African Liberation Party", "votes_african_political_system": "African Political System", "votes_african_renaissance_party": "African Renaissance Party", "votes_all_nigeria_people_s_party": "All Nigeria People's Party", "votes_all_progressives_grand_alliance": "All Progressives Grand Alliance", "votes_alliance_for_democracy": "Alliance for Democracy", "votes_allied_congress_party_of_nigeria": "Allied Congress Party of Nigeria", "votes_change_advocacy_party": "Change Advocacy Party", "votes_congress_for_progressive_change": "Congress for Progressive Change", "votes_democratic_front_for_people_s_federa": "Democratic Front for People's Federation", "votes_democratic_people_s_party": "Democratic People's Party", "votes_kowa_party": "Kowa Party", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_mega_progressives_people_s_party": "Mega Progressives People's Party", "votes_national_conscience_party": "National Conscience Party", "votes_national_solidarity_democratic_party": "National Solidarity Democratic Party", "votes_national_transformation_party": "National Transformation Party", "votes_pda": "PDA", "votes_people_for_democratic_change": "People for Democratic Change", "votes_people_s_democratic_party": "People's Democratic Party", "votes_people_s_party_of_nigeria": "People's Party of Nigeria", "votes_people_s_redemption_party": "People's Redemption Party", "votes_progressive_action_congress": "Progressive Action Congress", "votes_progressive_people_s_alliance": "Progressive People's Alliance", "votes_social_democratic_mega_party": "Social Democratic Mega Party", "votes_united_democratic_party": "United Democratic Party", "votes_united_nigeria_people_s_party": "United Nigeria People's Party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 360, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 360, "registered_not_positive": 360}, "n_stations_flagged": 360, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:20:33.039212", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.604, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.432, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.481, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.348, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.432, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.608, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.346, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.505, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.376, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.624, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.24, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.481, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.348, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.348, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.272, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.272, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.643, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.643, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.594, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.594, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "PDP", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "CPC", "margin": 27.94, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "NGA", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 360}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "61f4f536a1af4490b7bc7e08f4189f11", "name": "New Zealand 2011 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 140)", "metadata": {"country": "New Zealand", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "New Zealand lower-house election 2011, CONSTITUENCY level (140 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_act_new_zealand": "act new zealand", "votes_alliance": "alliance", "votes_aotearoa_legalise_cannabis_party": "aotearoa legalise cannabis party", "votes_aotearoa_nz_youth_party": "aotearoa nz youth party", "votes_communist_league": "communist league", "votes_conservative_party_of_new_zealand": "conservative party of new zealand", "votes_green_party_of_aotearoa_new_zealand": "green party of aotearoa new zealand", "votes_human_rights_party": "human rights party", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_labour": "labour", "votes_libertarianz": "libertarianz", "votes_mana_party": "mana party", "votes_maori_party": "maori party", "votes_national": "national", "votes_new_economics_party": "new economics party", "votes_new_zealand_democratic_party_for_soc": "new zealand democratic party for social credit", "votes_new_zealand_economic_euthenics": "new zealand economic euthenics", "votes_new_zealand_first_party": "new zealand first party", "votes_new_zealand_sovereignty_party": "new zealand sovereignty party", "votes_nga_iwi_morehu_movement": "nga iwi morehu movement", "votes_pirate_party_of_new_zealand": "pirate party of new zealand", "votes_restore_all_things_in_christ_party": "restore all things in christ party", "votes_united_future_new_zealand": "united future new zealand"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 140, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:20:29.348632", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.876, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.94, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.891, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.837, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.876, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.923, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.79, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.535, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.634, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.787, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.009, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.009, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 140}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4876cda12ab44899a7c8886acfc9d6c1", "name": "New Zealand 2008 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 140)", "metadata": {"country": "New Zealand", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "New Zealand lower-house election 2008, CONSTITUENCY level (140 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_act_new_zealand": "act new zealand", "votes_alliance": "alliance", "votes_aotearoa_legalise_cannabis_party": "aotearoa legalise cannabis party", "votes_aotearoa_nz_youth_party": "aotearoa nz youth party", "votes_bill_and_ben_party": "bill and ben party", "votes_communist_league": "communist league", "votes_direct_democracy_party_of_new_zealan": "direct democracy party of new zealand", "votes_family_party": "family party", "votes_green_party_of_aotearoa_new_zealand": "green party of aotearoa new zealand", "votes_hapu_party": "hapu party", "votes_human_rights_party": "human rights party", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_jim_anderton_s_progressive_party": "jim anderton's progressive party", "votes_kiwi_party": "kiwi party", "votes_labour": "labour", "votes_libertarianz": "libertarianz", "votes_maori_party": "maori party", "votes_mcgillicuddy_serious": "mcgillicuddy serious", "votes_national": "national", "votes_new_zealand_democratic_party_for_soc": "new zealand democratic party for social credit", "votes_new_zealand_economic_euthenics": "new zealand economic euthenics", "votes_new_zealand_first_party": "new zealand first party", "votes_new_zealand_pacific_party": "new zealand pacific party", "votes_new_zealand_representative_party": "new zealand representative party", "votes_no_commercial_airport_at_whenuapai_a": "no commercial airport at whenuapai airbase party", "votes_republic_of_new_zealand_party": "republic of new zealand party", "votes_residents_action_movement": "residents action movement", "votes_restore_all_things_in_christ_party": "restore all things in christ party", "votes_united_future_new_zealand": "united future new zealand", "votes_workers_party": "workers party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 140, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:20:26.303460", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.873, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.939, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.88, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.825, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.796, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.009, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.009, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 140}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2626fc836e6d4cf59153992658e6efaa", "name": "New Zealand 2005 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 138)", "metadata": {"country": "New Zealand", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "New Zealand lower-house election 2005, CONSTITUENCY level (138 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_99_mp_party": "99 mp party", "votes_act_new_zealand": "act new zealand", "votes_alliance": "alliance", "votes_anti_capitalist_alliance": "anti-capitalist alliance", "votes_aotearoa_legalise_cannabis_party": "aotearoa legalise cannabis party", "votes_christian_heritage_party_of_new_zeal": "christian heritage party of new zealand", "votes_communist_league": "communist league", "votes_destiny_new_zealand": "destiny new zealand", "votes_direct_democracy_party_of_new_zealan": "direct democracy party of new zealand", "votes_equal_values_party": "equal values party", "votes_green_party_of_aotearoa_new_zealand": "green party of aotearoa new zealand", "votes_human_rights_party": "human rights party", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_jim_anderton_s_progressive_party": "jim anderton's progressive party", "votes_labour": "labour", "votes_libertarianz": "libertarianz", "votes_maori_party": "maori party", "votes_national": "national", "votes_new_zealand_democratic_party_for_soc": "new zealand democratic party for social credit", "votes_new_zealand_economic_euthenics": "new zealand economic euthenics", "votes_new_zealand_family_rights_protection": "new zealand family rights protection party", "votes_new_zealand_first_party": "new zealand first party", "votes_nz_republicans_party": "nz republicans party", "votes_one_new_zealand_party": "one new zealand party", "votes_rangitikei_first": "rangitikei first", "votes_republic_of_new_zealand_party": "republic of new zealand party", "votes_restore_all_things_in_christ_party": "restore all things in christ party", "votes_united_future_new_zealand": "united future new zealand"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 138, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:20:22.174565", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.69, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.938, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.879, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.824, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.69, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.938, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.924, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.264, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.529, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.009, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.009, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 138}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ffa36324fbc547e6ae3e7da270d92674", "name": "New Zealand 2002 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 138)", "metadata": {"country": "New Zealand", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "New Zealand lower-house election 2002, CONSTITUENCY level (138 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_act_new_zealand": "act new zealand", "votes_alliance": "alliance", "votes_anti_capitalist_alliance": "anti-capitalist alliance", "votes_aotearoa_legalise_cannabis_party": "aotearoa legalise cannabis party", "votes_aotearoa_nz_youth_party": "aotearoa nz youth party", "votes_aroha_ngia_tatou": "aroha ngia tatou", "votes_beneficiaries": "beneficiaries", "votes_christian_heritage_party_of_new_zeal": "christian heritage party of new zealand", "votes_communist_league": "communist league", "votes_equal_rights": "equal rights", "votes_green_party_of_aotearoa_new_zealand": "green party of aotearoa new zealand", "votes_human_rights_party": "human rights party", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_jim_anderton_s_progressive_party": "jim anderton's progressive party", "votes_labour": "labour", "votes_libertarianz": "libertarianz", "votes_mai": "mai", "votes_mana_maori_movement": "mana maori movement", "votes_national": "national", "votes_new_generation": "new generation", "votes_new_zealand_economic_euthenics": "new zealand economic euthenics", "votes_new_zealand_first_party": "new zealand first party", "votes_nga_iwi_morehu_movement": "nga iwi morehu movement", "votes_no_more_parties_no_more_politics_new": "no more parties/no more politics/new millennium partnership", "votes_one_new_zealand_party": "one new zealand party", "votes_outdoor_recreation_new_zealand": "outdoor recreation new zealand", "votes_p_c_p_coalition": "p.c.p coalition", "votes_quality_of_life": "quality of life", "votes_reform_s_tahi": "reform's tahi", "votes_united_future_new_zealand": "united future new zealand", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 138, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:20:15.092364", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.763, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.885, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.881, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.826, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.009, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.009, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 138}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "834db6926e184c758e36a03b768bf133", "name": "New Zealand 1999 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 134)", "metadata": {"country": "New Zealand", "year": 1999, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "New Zealand lower-house election 1999, CONSTITUENCY level (134 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_act_new_zealand": "act new zealand", "votes_alliance": "alliance", "votes_animals_first": "animals first", "votes_aotearoa_legalise_cannabis_party": "aotearoa legalise cannabis party", "votes_aroha_ngia_tatou": "aroha ngia tatou", "votes_asia_pacific_united_party": "asia pacific united party", "votes_christian_heritage_party_of_new_zeal": "christian heritage party of new zealand", "votes_christians_against_abortion": "christians against abortion", "votes_equal_rights": "equal rights", "votes_freedom_movement": "freedom movement", "votes_future_new_zealand": "future new zealand", "votes_green_party_of_aotearoa_new_zealand": "green party of aotearoa new zealand", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_labour": "labour", "votes_libertarianz": "libertarianz", "votes_mana_maori_movement": "mana maori movement", "votes_mana_wahine_te_ira_tangata": "mana wahine te ira tangata", "votes_mauri_pacific": "mauri pacific", "votes_mcgillicuddy_serious": "mcgillicuddy serious", "votes_national": "national", "votes_natural_law_party": "natural law party", "votes_new_zealand_first_party": "new zealand first party", "votes_new_zealand_republican_party": "new zealand republican party", "votes_no_more_parties_no_more_politics_new": "no more parties/no more politics/new millennium partnership", "votes_one_new_zealand_party": "one new zealand party", "votes_people_s_choice_party": "people's choice party", "votes_piri_wiri_tua_movement": "piri wiri tua movement", "votes_south_island_party": "south island party", "votes_te_tawharau": "te tawharau", "votes_united_new_zealand": "united new zealand", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 134, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:20:12.090885", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.761, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.886, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.88, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.825, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.761, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.665, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.009, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.009, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 134}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "23fade88d8f341e29282e612d527a8ea", "name": "Nepal 2017 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 166)", "metadata": {"country": "Nepal", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Nepal lower-house election 2017, CONSTITUENCY level (166 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_": "\u0906\u092e\u0942\u0932 \u092a\u0930\u093f\u0935\u0930\u094d\u0924\u0928 \u092e\u0938\u093f\u0939\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "votes__2": "\u090f\u0915\u0940\u0915\u0943\u0924 \u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u091c\u093e\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940(\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940)", "votes__3": "\u091c\u0928\u0936\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "votes__4": "\u091c\u0928\u0938\u092e\u093e\u091c\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "votes__5": "\u0926\u0947\u0936\u092d\u0915\u094d\u0924 \u091c\u0928\u0917\u0923\u0924\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u092e\u094b\u0930\u094d\u091a\u093e \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "votes__6": "\u0928\u092f\u093e\u0901 \u0936\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "votes__7": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u092e\u094d\u092f\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 (\u090f\u092e\u093e\u0932\u0947)", "votes__8": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u092e\u094d\u092f\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 (\u092e\u093e\u0913\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u0915\u0947\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094d\u0930)", "votes__9": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u092e\u094d\u092f\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 (\u092e\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u094d\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u0932\u0947\u0928\u093f\u0928\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940)", "votes__10": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u092e\u094d\u092f\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 (\u092e\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u094d\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940)", "votes__11": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u092e\u094d\u092f\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 (\u092e\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u094d\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940) - \u091c\u0928\u0938\u092e\u093e\u091c\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940, \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "votes__12": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u091c\u0928\u0924\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "votes__13": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u092e\u091c\u0926\u0941\u0930 \u0915\u093f\u0938\u093e\u0928 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "votes__14": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0938\u0902\u0918\u0940\u092f \u0938\u092e\u093e\u091c\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "votes__15": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 \u0915\u093e\u0901\u0917\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0938", "votes__16": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 \u0915\u093e\u0902\u0917\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0938 (\u092c\u0940.\u092a\u0940.)", "votes__17": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 \u091c\u0928\u0924\u093e \u0926\u0932", "votes__18": "\u092c\u0939\u0941\u091c\u0928 \u0936\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "votes__19": "\u092e\u0902\u0917\u094b\u0932 \u0928\u0947\u0936\u0928\u0932 \u0905\u0930\u094d\u0917\u0928\u093e\u0907\u091c\u0947\u0938\u0928", "votes__20": "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u091c\u0928\u0924\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "votes__21": "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u091c\u0928\u092e\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "votes__22": "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u091c\u0928\u092e\u094b\u0930\u094d\u091a\u093e", "votes__23": "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u091c\u093e\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "votes__24": "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u091c\u093e\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 (\u092a\u094d\u0930\u091c\u093e\u0924\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915)", "votes__25": "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u092e\u0941\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u0906\u0928\u094d\u0926\u094b\u0932\u0928 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "votes__26": "\u0935\u093f\u0935\u0947\u0915\u0936\u0940\u0932 \u0938\u093e\u091d\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "votes__27": "\u0938\u0902\u0918\u0940\u092f \u0932\u094b\u0915\u0924\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u092e\u091e\u094d\u091a", "votes__28": "\u0938\u0902\u0918\u0940\u092f \u0932\u094b\u0915\u0924\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u092e\u091e\u094d\u091a(\u0925\u0930\u0941\u0939\u091f)", "votes__29": "\u0938\u0902\u0918\u0940\u092f \u0938\u092e\u093e\u091c\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u092b\u094b\u0930\u092e \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "votes__30": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 166, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:20:09.364285", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.362, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.737, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.66, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.553, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.362, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.321, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.58, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.105, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.797, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.66, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.553, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.653, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 166}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e4bf89e0c76f47b2a879d2a4d3a1a3cc", "name": "Nepal 2013 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 240)", "metadata": {"country": "Nepal", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Nepal lower-house election 2013, CONSTITUENCY level (240 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_communist_party_of_nepal_marxist_len": "Communist Party of Nepal (Marxist-Leninist)", "votes_communist_party_of_nepal_united_marx": "Communist Party of Nepal (United Marxist-Leninist)", "votes_federal_socialist_party_nepal": "Federal Socialist Party Nepal", "votes_harmony_party": "Harmony Party", "votes_madeshi_people_s_rights_forum_democr": "Madeshi People's Rights Forum (Democratic)", "votes_madeshi_people_s_rights_forum_nepal": "Madeshi People's Rights Forum (Nepal)", "votes_national_democratic_party": "National Democratic Party", "votes_national_democratic_party_nepal": "National Democratic Party Nepal", "votes_national_madeshi_socialist_party": "National Madeshi Socialist Party", "votes_national_people_s_front": "National People's Front", "votes_nepal_communist_party_united": "Nepal Communist Party (United)", "votes_nepal_workers_and_peasants_party": "Nepal Workers' and Peasants' Party", "votes_nepali_congress": "Nepali Congress", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_tarai_adhesa_democratic_party": "Tarai\u90a6adhesa Democratic Party", "votes_united_communist_party_of_nepal_maoi": "United Communist Party of Nepal (Maoists)", "votes_": "\u090f\u0915\u0940\u0915\u0943\u0924 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u092e\u094d\u092f\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 (\u092e\u093e\u0913\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940)", "votes__2": "\u0924\u0930\u093e\u0908\u2013\u092e\u0927\u0947\u0936 \u0932\u094b\u0915\u0924\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "votes__3": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u092e\u094d\u092f\u0941\u0928\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 (\u092e\u093e\u0930\u094d\u0915\u094d\u0938\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940\u2013\u0932\u0947\u0928\u093f\u0928\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940)", "votes__4": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932 \u0915\u092e\u094d\u092f\u0942\u0928\u093f\u0937\u094d\u091f \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 (\u090f. \u092e\u093e. \u0932\u0947)", "votes__5": "\u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932\u0940 \u0915\u093e\u0901\u0917\u094d\u0930\u0947\u0938", "votes__6": "\u092e\u0927\u0947\u0936\u0940 \u091c\u0928\u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u092b\u094b\u0930\u092e, \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "votes__7": "\u092e\u0927\u0947\u0936\u0940 \u091c\u0928\u0905\u0927\u093f\u0915\u093e\u0930 \u092b\u094b\u0930\u092e, \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932(\u0932\u094b\u0915\u0924\u093e\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u0915)", "votes__8": "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u091c\u0928\u092e\u094b\u0930\u094d\u091a\u093e", "votes__9": "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u091c\u093e\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "votes__10": "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u092a\u094d\u0930\u091c\u093e\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940 \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "votes__11": "\u0930\u093e\u0937\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f \u092e\u0927\u0947\u0936 \u0938\u092e\u093e\u091c\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "votes__12": "\u0938\u0919\u094d\u0918\u0940\u092f \u0938\u092e\u093e\u091c\u0935\u093e\u0926\u0940 \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940, \u0928\u0947\u092a\u093e\u0932", "votes__13": "\u0938\u0926\u094d\u092d\u093e\u0935\u0928\u093e \u092a\u093e\u0930\u094d\u091f\u0940", "votes__14": "\u0938\u094d\u0935\u0924\u0928\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 240, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 239, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1, "registered_not_positive": 239}, "n_stations_flagged": 240, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:20:06.090027", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.441, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.471, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.28, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.191, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.441, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.471, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.192, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.481, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.62, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.034, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.758, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.131, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.533, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.28, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.28, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.191, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.191, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.23, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.23, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.773, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.773, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.72, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.72, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 240}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d86344136c1f484a8c5fd382461ad276", "name": "Myanmar 2015 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 330)", "metadata": {"country": "Myanmar", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Myanmar lower-house election 2015, CONSTITUENCY level (330 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_mon_region_democracy_party": "All Mon Region Democracy Party", "votes_arakan_national_party": "Arakan National Party", "votes_chin_league_for_democracy": "Chin League for Democracy", "votes_chin_national_democratic_party": "Chin National Democratic Party", "votes_danu_national_democracy_party": "Danu National Democracy Party", "votes_democratic_party": "Democratic Party", "votes_democratic_party_for_a_new_society": "Democratic Party for A New Society", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_kachin_state_democracy_party": "Kachin State Democracy Party", "votes_kayin_democratic_party": "Kayin Democratic Party", "votes_kayin_people_s_party": "Kayin People\u2019s Party", "votes_lahu_national_development_party": "Lahu National Development Party", "votes_lisu_national_development_party": "Lisu National Development Party", "votes_mon_national_party": "Mon National Party", "votes_myanmar_farmer_development_party": "Myanmar Farmer Development Party", "votes_national_democratic_force": "National Democratic Force", "votes_national_development_party": "National Development Party", "votes_national_league_for_democracy": "National League for Democracy", "votes_national_unity_party": "National Unity Party", "votes_pao_national_organisation": "Pao National Organisation", "votes_phlone_sqaw_democratic_party": "Phlone-Sqaw Democratic Party", "votes_rakhine_state_national_united_party": "Rakhine State National United Party", "votes_shan_nationalities_democratic_party": "Shan Nationalities Democratic Party", "votes_shan_nationalities_league_for_democr": "Shan Nationalities League for Democracy", "votes_ta_arng_palaung_national_party": "Ta-Arng Palaung National Party", "votes_tai_leng_nationalities_development_p": "Tai-Leng Nationalities Development Party", "votes_the_88_generation_students_youth_uni": "The 88 Generation Students Youth (Union of Myanmar)", "votes_union_solidarity_and_development_par": "Union Solidarity and Development Party", "votes_united_democratic_party": "United Democratic Party", "votes_zomi_congress_for_democracy": "Zomi Congress for Democracy", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 330, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 7, "cast_valid_mismatch": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 9, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:20:02.704867", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 330}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "043cec64df78404d961a18b3f01ee2dc", "name": "Myanmar 2010 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 330)", "metadata": {"country": "Myanmar", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Myanmar lower-house election 2010, CONSTITUENCY level (330 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_mon_region_democracy_party": "All Mon Region Democracy Party", "votes_chin_national_party": "Chin National Party", "votes_chin_progressive_party": "Chin Progressive Party", "votes_democracy_and_peace_party": "Democracy and Peace Party", "votes_democratic_party": "Democratic Party", "votes_difference_and_peace_party": "Difference and Peace Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_inn_national_development_party": "Inn National Development Party", "votes_kayan_national_party": "Kayan National Party", "votes_kayin_people_s_party": "Kayin People\u2019s Party", "votes_kokang_democracy_and_unity_party": "Kokang Democracy And Unity Party", "votes_kokang_democracy_and_unity_2": "Kokang Democracy and Unity Party", "votes_national_democratic_force": "National Democratic Force", "votes_national_democratic_party_for_develo": "National Democratic Party for Development", "votes_national_political_alliances_league": "National Political Alliances League", "votes_national_unity_party": "National Unity Party", "votes_new_era_people_s_party": "New Era People\u2019s Party", "votes_phalon_sawaw_democratic_party": "Phalon-Sawaw Democratic Party", "votes_rakhine_nationals_progressive_party": "Rakhine Nationals Progressive Party", "votes_shan_nationalities_democratic_party": "Shan Nationalities Democratic Party", "votes_taaung_palaung_national_party": "Taaung (Palaung) National Party", "votes_the_88_generation_students_youth_uni": "The 88 Generation Students Youth (Union of Myanmar)", "votes_union_democratic_party": "Union Democratic Party", "votes_union_solidarity_and_development_par": "Union Solidarity and Development Party", "votes_union_of_myanmar_federation_of_natio": "Union of Myanmar Federation of National Politics", "votes_union_of_myanmar_federatio_2": "Union of Myanmar Federation of National Politics\u00a0", "votes_united_democratic_party": "United Democratic Party", "votes_unity_and_democracy_party_of_kachin_": "Unity and Democracy Party of Kachin State", "votes_wa_democratic_party": "Wa Democratic Party", "votes_wunthanu_nld": "Wunthanu NLD", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 330, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 313, "registered_not_positive": 330}, "n_stations_flagged": 330, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:19:58.278017", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 330}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "aa137a23349d46eb95132d705943756f", "name": "Mexico 2024 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 301)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Mexico lower-house election 2024, CONSTITUENCY level (301 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_movimiento_ciudadano": "Movimiento Ciudadano", "votes_movimiento_regeneraci_n_nacional": "Movimiento Regeneraci\u00f3n Nacional", "votes_partido_acci_n_nacional": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional", "votes_partido_acci_n_nacional_partido_revo": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional-Partido Revolucionario Institucional", "votes_partido_acci_n_nacional_pa_2": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional-Partido Revolucionario Institucional-Partido de la Revoluci\u00f3n Democr\u00e1tica", "votes_partido_acci_n_nacional_partido_de_l": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional-Partido de la Revoluci\u00f3n Democr\u00e1tica", "votes_partido_revolucionario_institucional": "Partido Revolucionario Institucional", "votes_partido_revolucionario_ins_2": "Partido Revolucionario Institucional-Partido de la Revoluci\u00f3n Democr\u00e1tica", "votes_partido_verde_ecologista_de_m_xico": "Partido Verde Ecologista de M\u00e9xico", "votes_partido_verde_ecologista_de_m_xico_m": "Partido Verde Ecologista de M\u00e9xico-Movimiento Regeneraci\u00f3n Nacional", "votes_partido_verde_ecologista_de_m_xico_p": "Partido Verde Ecologista de M\u00e9xico-Partido del Trabajo", "votes_partido_verde_ecologista_d_2": "Partido Verde Ecologista de M\u00e9xico-Partido del Trabajo-Movimiento Regeneraci\u00f3n Nacional", "votes_partido_de_la_revoluci_n_democr_tica": "Partido de la Revoluci\u00f3n Democr\u00e1tica", "votes_partido_del_trabajo": "Partido del Trabajo", "votes_partido_del_trabajo_movimiento_regen": "Partido del Trabajo-Movimiento Regeneraci\u00f3n Nacional"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 301, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 301, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1, "cast_gt_registered": 301}, "n_stations_flagged": 301, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:19:53.937050", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 301}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "68abf051d3024033b7f454a85e57f71e", "name": "Mexico 2021 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 301)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Mexico lower-house election 2021, CONSTITUENCY level (301 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_fuerza_por_m_xico": "Fuerza por M\u00e9xico", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_movimiento_ciudadano": "Movimiento Ciudadano", "votes_movimiento_regeneraci_n_nacional": "Movimiento Regeneraci\u00f3n Nacional", "votes_partido_acci_n_nacional": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional", "votes_partido_acci_n_nacional_partido_revo": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional-Partido Revolucionario Institucional", "votes_partido_acci_n_nacional_pa_2": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional-Partido Revolucionario Institucional-Partido de la Revoluci\u00f3n Democr\u00e1tica", "votes_partido_acci_n_nacional_partido_de_l": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional-Partido de la Revoluci\u00f3n Democr\u00e1tica", "votes_partido_encuentro_solidario": "Partido Encuentro Solidario", "votes_partido_revolucionario_institucional": "Partido Revolucionario Institucional", "votes_partido_revolucionario_ins_2": "Partido Revolucionario Institucional-Partido de la Revoluci\u00f3n Democr\u00e1tica", "votes_partido_verde_ecologista_de_m_xico": "Partido Verde Ecologista de M\u00e9xico", "votes_partido_verde_ecologista_de_m_xico_m": "Partido Verde Ecologista de M\u00e9xico-Movimiento Regeneraci\u00f3n Nacional", "votes_partido_verde_ecologista_de_m_xico_p": "Partido Verde Ecologista de M\u00e9xico-Partido del Trabajo", "votes_partido_verde_ecologista_d_2": "Partido Verde Ecologista de M\u00e9xico-Partido del Trabajo-Movimiento Regeneraci\u00f3n Nacional", "votes_partido_de_la_revoluci_n_democr_tica": "Partido de la Revoluci\u00f3n Democr\u00e1tica", "votes_partido_del_trabajo": "Partido del Trabajo", "votes_partido_del_trabajo_movimiento_regen": "Partido del Trabajo-Movimiento Regeneraci\u00f3n Nacional", "votes_redes_sociales_progresistas": "Redes Sociales Progresistas"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 301, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 35, "registered_not_positive": 301, "cast_gt_registered": 301}, "n_stations_flagged": 301, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:19:50.365593", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.624, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.534, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 301}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4a46dc2f975a4664b8f20fd76dc93351", "name": "Mexico 2018 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 301)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Mexico lower-house election 2018, CONSTITUENCY level (301 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alianza_por_m_xico": "Alianza por M\u00e9xico", "votes_encuentro_social": "Encuentro - Social", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_candidates": "Independent Candidates", "votes_morena_encuentro_social": "Morena_Encuentro Social", "votes_movimiento_ciudadano": "Movimiento Ciudadano", "votes_movimiento_regeneraci_n_nacional": "Movimiento Regeneraci\u00f3n Nacional", "votes_movimiento_regeneraci_n_nacional_mor": "Movimiento Regeneraci\u00f3n Nacional- Morena", "votes_nueva_alianza": "Nueva Alianza", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_pan_movimiento_ciudadano": "PAN_Movimiento Ciudadano", "votes_pan_prd": "PAN_PRD", "votes_pan_prd_mc": "PAN_PRD_MC", "votes_prd_mc": "PRD_MC", "votes_pri_verde_alianza": "PRI/Verde/Alianza", "votes_pri_na": "PRI_NA", "votes_pt_morena_encuentro_social": "PT/Morena/Encuentro Social", "votes_pt_encuentro_social": "PT_Encuentro Social", "votes_pt_morena": "PT_MORENA", "votes_pvem_na": "PVEM_NA", "votes_partido_acci_n_nacional": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional", "votes_partido_encuentro_social": "Partido Encuentro Social", "votes_partido_nueva_alianza": "Partido Nueva Alianza", "votes_partido_revolucionario_institucional": "Partido Revolucionario Institucional", "votes_partido_verde_ecologista_de_m_xico": "Partido Verde Ecologista de M\u00e9xico", "votes_partido_de_la_revoluci_n_democr_tica": "Partido de la Revoluci\u00f3n Democr\u00e1tica", "votes_partido_de_la_revoluci_n_dem_cratica": "Partido de la Revoluci\u00f3n Dem\u00f3cratica", "votes_partido_del_trabajo": "Partido del Trabajo"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 301, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 2, "registered_not_positive": 1, "cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:19:46.187467", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.702, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.958, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.675, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.452, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.702, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.162, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.547, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.452, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.372, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.652, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "National Regeneration Movemenr (MORENA)", "winner_candidate": "Andr\u00e9s Manuel L\u00f3pez Obrador", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "National Action Party (PAN)", "margin": 30.91, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MEX", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 301}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cecfd73fca2844248f858cf020f69c16", "name": "Mexico 2015 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 301)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Mexico lower-house election 2015, CONSTITUENCY level (301 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_candidato_independiente": "Candidato Independiente", "votes_candiditos_no_registrados": "Candiditos No Registrados", "votes_coalici_n_de_izquierda_progresista": "Coalici\u00f3n de Izquierda Progresista", "votes_movimiento_ciudadano": "Movimiento Ciudadano", "votes_movimiento_regeneraci_n_nacional_mor": "Movimiento Regeneraci\u00f3n Nacional (Morena)", "votes_pri_pvem": "PRI-PVEM", "votes_partido_acci_n_nacional": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional", "votes_partido_encuentro_social": "Partido Encuentro Social", "votes_partido_humanista": "Partido Humanista", "votes_partido_nueva_alianza": "Partido Nueva Alianza", "votes_partido_revolucionario_institucional": "Partido Revolucionario Institucional", "votes_partido_verde_ecologista_de_m_xico": "Partido Verde Ecologista de M\u00e9xico", "votes_partido_de_la_revoluci_n_democr_tica": "Partido de la Revoluci\u00f3n democr\u00e1tica", "votes_partido_del_trabajo": "Partido del Trabajo"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 301, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:19:42.548420", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.467, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.655, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.643, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.433, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.467, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.655, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.985, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.589, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.254, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.836, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.643, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.643, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.433, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.433, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.329, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.329, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.69, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.69, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.7, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 301}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a936a890ab1749dcbd60da8daa9127e6", "name": "Mexico 2012 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 306)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Mexico lower-house election 2012, CONSTITUENCY level (306 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_movimento_ciudadano": "Movimento Ciudadano", "votes_partido_acci_n_nacional": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional", "votes_partido_revolucionario_institucional": "Partido Revolucionario Institucional", "votes_partido_verde_ecologista_de_m_xico": "Partido Verde Ecologista de M\u00e9xico", "votes_partido_de_la_revoluci_n_dem_cratica": "Partido de la Revoluci\u00f3n Dem\u00f3cratica", "votes_partido_del_trabajo": "Partido del Trabajo", "votes_candidatos_no_registrados": "candidatos no registrados", "votes_compromiso_por_m_xico_pri_pvem": "compromiso por m\u00e9xico (pri+pvem)", "votes_movimiento_progresista_prd_pt_mc": "movimiento progresista (prd+pt+mc)", "votes_others": "others", "votes_partido_acci_n_nacional_2": "partido acci\u00f3n nacional", "votes_partido_del_trabajo_2": "partido del trabajo", "votes_partido_nueva_alianza": "partido nueva alianza", "votes_partido_revolucionario_ins_2": "partido revolucionario institucional", "votes_partido_verde_ecologista_d_2": "partido verde ecologista de m\u00e9xico", "votes_prd_mc": "prd+mc", "votes_prd_pt": "prd+pt", "votes_pt_mc": "pt+mc"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 306, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:19:39.080130", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.336, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.825, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.65, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.457, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.336, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.315, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.243, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.65, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.457, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.336, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.336, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.688, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.663, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.663, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.791, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI)", "winner_candidate": "Enrique Pena Nieto", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Partido Revolucionario Democratico (PRD)", "margin": 6.78, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MEX", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 306}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "600d539ac94c4539a99d4622f8658f6b", "name": "Mexico 2009 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 306)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Mexico lower-house election 2009, CONSTITUENCY level (306 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_convergencia_por_la_democracia": "Convergencia por la Democracia", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_partido_acci_n_nacional": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional", "votes_partido_revolucionario_institucional": "Partido Revolucionario Institucional", "votes_partido_socialdem_crata": "Partido Socialdem\u00f3crata", "votes_partido_verde_ecologista_de_m_xico": "Partido Verde Ecologista de M\u00e9xico", "votes_partido_de_la_revoluci_n_dem_cratica": "Partido de la Revoluci\u00f3n Dem\u00f3cratica", "votes_partido_del_trabajo": "Partido del Trabajo", "votes_candidatos_no_registrados": "candidatos no registrados", "votes_convergencia_por_la_democr_2": "convergencia por la democracia", "votes_partido_acci_n_nacional_2": "partido acci\u00f3n nacional", "votes_partido_del_trabajo_2": "partido del trabajo", "votes_partido_nueva_alianza": "partido nueva alianza", "votes_partido_revolucionario_ins_2": "partido revolucionario institucional", "votes_partido_socialdem_crata_2": "partido socialdem\u00f3crata", "votes_partido_verde_ecologista_d_2": "partido verde ecologista de m\u00e9xico", "votes_primero_m_xico_pri_pvem": "primero m\u00e9xico (pri+pvem)", "votes_salvemos_a_m_xico_pt_convergencia": "salvemos a m\u00e9xico (pt+convergencia)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 306, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:19:35.450236", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.481, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.626, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.65, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.459, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.481, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.626, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.387, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.377, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.441, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.65, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.691, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.609, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 306}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "204db8936e444b9ca7aad387d4fc29c4", "name": "Malaysia 2022 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 222)", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia lower-house election 2022, CONSTITUENCY level (222 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_barisan_nasional": "BARISAN NASIONAL", "votes_bebas": "BEBAS", "votes_bebas_bebas": "BEBAS (BEBAS)", "votes_bebas_buku": "BEBAS (BUKU)", "votes_bebas_gajah": "BEBAS (GAJAH)", "votes_bebas_kerusi": "BEBAS (KERUSI)", "votes_bebas_kuda": "BEBAS (KUDA)", "votes_bebas_kunci": "BEBAS (KUNCI)", "votes_bebas_pen": "BEBAS (PEN)", "votes_bebas_perahu": "BEBAS (PERAHU)", "votes_bebas_pokok": "BEBAS (POKOK)", "votes_bebas_rumah": "BEBAS (RUMAH)", "votes_bebas_telefon": "BEBAS (TELEFON)", "votes_gabungan_parti_sarawak": "GABUNGAN PARTI SARAWAK", "votes_ikatan_demokratik_malaysia": "IKATAN DEMOKRATIK MALAYSIA", "votes_pakatan_harapan": "PAKATAN HARAPAN", "votes_parti_bangsa_malaysia": "PARTI BANGSA MALAYSIA", "votes_parti_bansa_dayak_sarawak": "PARTI BANSA DAYAK SARAWAK", "votes_parti_bersatu_rakyat_sabah": "PARTI BERSATU RAKYAT SABAH", "votes_parti_bumi_kenyalang": "PARTI BUMI KENYALANG", "votes_parti_bumiputera_perkasa_malaysia": "PARTI BUMIPUTERA PERKASA MALAYSIA", "votes_parti_gabungan_rakyat_sabah": "PARTI GABUNGAN RAKYAT SABAH", "votes_parti_islam_se_malaysia": "PARTI ISLAM SE MALAYSIA", "votes_parti_kesejahteraan_demokratik_masya": "PARTI KESEJAHTERAAN DEMOKRATIK MASYARAKAT", "votes_parti_pejuang_tanahair": "PARTI PEJUANG TANAHAIR", "votes_parti_perikatan_nasional": "PARTI PERIKATAN NASIONAL", "votes_parti_rakay_malaysia": "PARTI RAKAY MALAYSIA", "votes_parti_sarawak_bersatu": "PARTI SARAWAK BERSATU", "votes_parti_tindakan_demokratik": "PARTI TINDAKAN DEMOKRATIK", "votes_parti_warisan_sabah": "PARTI WARISAN SABAH", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 222, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 222, "cast_gt_registered": 222}, "n_stations_flagged": 222, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:19:32.201735", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.615, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.647, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.459, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.316, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.615, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.647, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.21, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.012, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.561, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.39, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.226, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.343, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.343, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.368, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.615, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 222}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7d6f62b09d1242b8938475f072a3b935", "name": "Malaysia 2018 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 222)", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia lower-house election 2018, CONSTITUENCY level (222 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_of_hope": "Alliance of Hope", "votes_alliance_of_hope_democratic_action_p": "Alliance of Hope-Democratic Action Party (PH-DAP)", "votes_alliance_of_hope_malaysian_united_in": "Alliance of Hope-Malaysian United Indigenous Party (PH-PPBM)", "votes_alliance_of_hope_national_trust_part": "Alliance of Hope-National Trust Party (PH-AMANAH)", "votes_alliance_of_hope_people_s_justice_pa": "Alliance of Hope-People's Justice Party (PH-PKR)", "votes_bebas": "BEBAS", "votes_homeland_solidarity_party_star": "Homeland Solidarity Party (STAR)", "votes_ideas_of_prosperity_pan_malaysian_is": "Ideas of Prosperity-Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party (GS-PAS)", "votes_ideas_of_prospertity_malaysian_natio": "Ideas of Prospertity-Malaysian National Alliance Party (GS-IKATAN)", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_love_sabah_party_pcs": "Love Sabah Party (PCS)", "votes_malaysian_people_s_party_prm": "Malaysian People's Party (PRM)", "votes_malaysian_united_party": "Malaysian United Party", "votes_national_front_liberal_democratic_pa": "National Front-Liberal Democratic Party (BN-LDP)", "votes_national_front_malaysian_chinese_ass": "National Front-Malaysian Chinese Association (BN-MCA)", "votes_national_front_malaysian_indian_cong": "National Front-Malaysian Indian Congress (BN-MIC)", "votes_national_front_malaysian_people_s_mo": "National Front-Malaysian People's Movement Party (BN-Gerakan)", "votes_national_front_people_s_progressive_": "National Front-People's Progressive Party (BN-myPPP)", "votes_national_front_progressive_democrati": "National Front-Progressive Democratic Party (BN-PDP)", "votes_national_front_sarawak_people_s_part": "National Front-Sarawak People's Party (BN-PRS)", "votes_national_front_sarawak_united_people": "National Front-Sarawak United People's Party (BN-SUPP)", "votes_national_front_umno_bn_umno": "National Front-UMNO (BN-UMNO)", "votes_national_front_united_bumiputera_her": "National Front-United Bumiputera Heritage Party (BN-PBB)", "votes_national_front_united_sabah_party_bn": "National Front-United Sabah Party (BN-PBS)", "votes_national_front_united_sabah_people_s": "National Front-United Sabah People's Party (BN-PBRS)", "votes_sabah_heritage_party_warisan": "Sabah Heritage Party (WARISAN)", "votes_united_sabah_alliance_homeland_solid": "United Sabah Alliance-Homeland Solidarity Party (USA-STAR)", "votes_united_sabah_alliance_sabah_people_s": "United Sabah Alliance-Sabah People's Hope Party (USA-PHRS)", "votes_united_sabah_alliance_saba_2": "United Sabah Alliance-Sabah People's Unity Party (USA-PPRS)", "votes_united_sabah_alliance_sabah_progress": "United Sabah Alliance-Sabah Progressive Party (USA-SAPP)", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 222, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:19:28.894745", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.75, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.444, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.319, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.576, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.644, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.394, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.348, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.255, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.314, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.146, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.169, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.444, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.444, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.319, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.319, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.334, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.334, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.271, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.271, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.634, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.634, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 222}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6efdac5cd13d427e8437cc92daa27cec", "name": "Malaysia 2013 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 222)", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia lower-house election 2013, CONSTITUENCY level (222 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_homeland_solidarity_party_star": "Homeland Solidarity Party (STAR)", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_love_malaysia_party_pcm": "Love Malaysia Party (PCM)", "votes_malaysian_united_people_s_party": "Malaysian United People's Party", "votes_national_front_liberal_democratic_pa": "National Front-Liberal Democratic Party (BN-LDP)", "votes_national_front_malaysian_chinese_ass": "National Front-Malaysian Chinese Association (BN-MCA)", "votes_national_front_malaysian_indian_cong": "National Front-Malaysian Indian Congress (BN-MIC)", "votes_national_front_malaysian_people_s_mo": "National Front-Malaysian People's Movement Party (BN-Gerakan)", "votes_national_front_people_s_progressive_": "National Front-People's Progressive Party (BN-PPP)", "votes_national_front_sarawak_people_s_part": "National Front-Sarawak People's Party (BN-PRS)", "votes_national_front_sarawak_progressive_d": "National Front-Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party (BN-SPDP)", "votes_national_front_sarawak_united_people": "National Front-Sarawak United People's Party (BN-SUPP)", "votes_national_front_umno_bn_umno": "National Front-UMNO (BN-UMNO)", "votes_national_front_united_bumiputera_her": "National Front-United Bumiputera Heritage Party (BN-PBB)", "votes_national_front_united_sabah_party_bn": "National Front-United Sabah Party (BN-PBS)", "votes_national_front_united_sabah_people_s": "National Front-United Sabah People's Party (BN-PBRS)", "votes_pan_malaysian_islamic_front_berjasa": "Pan-Malaysian Islamic Front (BERJASA)", "votes_people_s_pact_democratic_action_part": "People's Pact-Democratic Action Party (PR-DAP)", "votes_people_s_pact_pan_malaysian_islamic_": "People's Pact-Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party (PR\u2013PAS)", "votes_people_s_pact_people_s_justice_party": "People's Pact-People's Justice Party (PR\u2013PKR)", "votes_people_s_welfare_party": "People's Welfare Party", "votes_sabah_progressive_party_sapp": "Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP)", "votes_sarawak_workers_party_swp": "Sarawak Workers Party (SWP)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 222, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 221}, "n_stations_flagged": 221, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:19:26.190493", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.086, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.004, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.321, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.206, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.086, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.452, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.613, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.333, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.333, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.177, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.11, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.698, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.174, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.321, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.321, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.206, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.206, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.225, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.225, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.615, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.578, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.578, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.574, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.315, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.315, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 222}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "680aaf4e48e4413784d15f5cc5cc59fc", "name": "Malaysia 2008 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 222)", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia lower-house election 2008, CONSTITUENCY level (222 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alternative_front_people_s_alliance_": "Alternative Front (People's Alliance-Democratic Action Party)", "votes_alternative_front_people_s_2": "Alternative Front (People's Alliance-Pan-Islamic Malaysian Party", "votes_alternative_front_people_s_3": "Alternative Front (People's Alliance-People's Justice Party)", "votes_individual": "Individual", "votes_malaysian_people_s_party": "Malaysian People's Party", "votes_national_front": "National Front", "votes_national_front_liberal_democratic_pa": "National Front - Liberal Democratic Party", "votes_national_front_malaysia_chinese_asso": "National Front - Malaysia Chinese Association", "votes_national_front_people_s_progessive_p": "National Front - People's Progessive Party", "votes_national_front_sabah_progressive_par": "National Front - Sabah Progressive Party", "votes_national_front_sarawak_native_people": "National Front - Sarawak Native People's Party", "votes_national_front_sarawak_progressive_d": "National Front - Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party", "votes_national_front_sarawak_united_people": "National Front - Sarawak United Peoples' Party", "votes_national_front_upko": "National Front - UPKO", "votes_national_front_united_traditional_bu": "National Front - United Traditional Bumiputera Party", "votes_national_front_malaysian_indian_cong": "National Front-Malaysian Indian Congress", "votes_national_front_malaysian_people_s_mo": "National Front-Malaysian People's Movement Party", "votes_national_front_united_malays_nationa": "National Front-United Malays National Organization", "votes_national_front_united_sabah_party": "National Front-United Sabah Party", "votes_sabah_people_s_united_front": "Sabah People's United Front", "votes_sarawak_national_party": "Sarawak National Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 222, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 200}, "n_stations_flagged": 200, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:19:22.938012", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.273, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.896, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.328, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.216, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.273, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.568, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.454, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.177, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.11, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.596, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.149, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.328, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.216, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.216, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.236, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.236, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.635, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.594, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.594, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.328, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 222}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "59763ccfddd540e8b5d5da1bd1ac17c4", "name": "Malaysia 2004 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 217)", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia lower-house election 2004, CONSTITUENCY level (217 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alternative_front_people_s_alliance_": "Alternative Front (People's Alliance-Democratic Action Party)", "votes_alternative_front_people_s_2": "Alternative Front (People's Alliance-Pan-Islamic Malaysian Party", "votes_alternative_front_people_s_3": "Alternative Front (People's Alliance-People's Justice Party)", "votes_individual": "Individual", "votes_malaysia_democratic_party": "Malaysia Democratic Party", "votes_national_front": "National Front", "votes_national_front_liberal_democratic_pa": "National Front - Liberal Democratic Party", "votes_national_front_malaysia_chinese_asso": "National Front - Malaysia Chinese Association", "votes_national_front_people_s_progessive_p": "National Front - People's Progessive Party", "votes_national_front_sabah_progressive_par": "National Front - Sabah Progressive Party", "votes_national_front_sarawak_native_people": "National Front - Sarawak Native People's Party", "votes_national_front_sarawak_progressive_d": "National Front - Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party", "votes_national_front_sarawak_united_people": "National Front - Sarawak United Peoples' Party", "votes_national_front_upko": "National Front - UPKO", "votes_national_front_united_sabah_people_s": "National Front - United Sabah People's Party", "votes_national_front_united_traditional_bu": "National Front - United Traditional Bumiputera Party", "votes_national_front_malaysian_indian_cong": "National Front-Malaysian Indian Congress", "votes_national_front_malaysian_people_s_mo": "National Front-Malaysian People's Movement Party", "votes_national_front_united_malays_nationa": "National Front-United Malays National Organization", "votes_national_front_united_sabah_party": "National Front-United Sabah Party", "votes_parti_reformasi_negeri": "Parti Reformasi Negeri", "votes_sabah_people_s_united_democratic_par": "Sabah People's United Democratic Party", "votes_sarawak_national_party": "Sarawak National Party", "votes_united_pasok_nunukragang_national_or": "United Pasok Nunukragang National Organization"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 217, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:19:20.149952", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.061, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.891, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.309, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.207, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.061, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.515, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.059, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.515, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.017, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.254, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.177, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.11, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.449, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.112, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.309, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.309, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.207, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.207, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.225, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.225, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.628, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.6, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.337, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.337, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 217}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ae718a3d33ca4b38b2c92644c5d30b7d", "name": "Malaysia 1999 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 193)", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 1999, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia lower-house election 1999, CONSTITUENCY level (193 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alternative_front_people_s_alliance_": "Alternative Front (People's Alliance-Democratic Action Party)", "votes_alternative_front_people_s_2": "Alternative Front (People's Alliance-Pan-Islamic Malaysian Party", "votes_alternative_front_people_s_3": "Alternative Front (People's Alliance-People's Justice Party)", "votes_barisan_jemaah_islamiah_se_malaysia": "Barisan Jemaah Islamiah Se Malaysia", "votes_individual": "Individual", "votes_malaysia_democratic_party": "Malaysia Democratic Party", "votes_malaysian_justice_movement": "Malaysian Justice Movement", "votes_malaysian_people_s_party": "Malaysian People's Party", "votes_national_front": "National Front", "votes_national_front_liberal_democratic_pa": "National Front - Liberal Democratic Party", "votes_national_front_malaysia_chinese_asso": "National Front - Malaysia Chinese Association", "votes_national_front_sabah_progressive_par": "National Front - Sabah Progressive Party", "votes_national_front_sarawak_native_people": "National Front - Sarawak Native People's Party", "votes_national_front_sarawak_united_people": "National Front - Sarawak United Peoples' Party", "votes_national_front_upko": "National Front - UPKO", "votes_national_front_united_sabah_people_s": "National Front - United Sabah People's Party", "votes_national_front_united_traditional_bu": "National Front - United Traditional Bumiputera Party", "votes_national_front_malaysian_indian_cong": "National Front-Malaysian Indian Congress", "votes_national_front_malaysian_people_s_mo": "National Front-Malaysian People's Movement Party", "votes_national_front_united_malays_nationa": "National Front-United Malays National Organization", "votes_national_front_united_sabah_party": "National Front-United Sabah Party", "votes_parti_reformasi_negeri": "Parti Reformasi Negeri", "votes_sarawak_national_party": "Sarawak National Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 193, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:19:16.712932", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.529, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.287, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.266, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.162, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.529, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.382, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.287, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.602, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.401, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.216, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.454, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.266, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.266, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.162, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.162, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.207, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.207, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.557, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.198, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 193}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9b03138715de461bb17d0e490f243336", "name": "Malaysia 1995 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 192)", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 1995, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia lower-house election 1995, CONSTITUENCY level (192 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democratic_action_party": "Democratic Action Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_islamic_party_of_malaysia": "Islamic Party of Malaysia", "votes_malaysian_people_s_justice_front": "Malaysian People's Justice Front", "votes_malaysian_people_s_party": "Malaysian People's Party", "votes_national_front": "National Front", "votes_sabah_united_party": "Sabah United Party", "votes_spirit_of_46_malay_party": "Spirit of '46 Malay Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 192, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:19:10.850078", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.513, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.464, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.258, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.162, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.378, "year": 1995, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.72, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.43, "year": 1995, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.216, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.112, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.258, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.258, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.162, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.162, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.204, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.564, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.564, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.557, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 1995, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.172, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 192}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4058f403ed2d4d88b605c3591358e83a", "name": "Malaysia 1990 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 180)", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 1990, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia lower-house election 1990, CONSTITUENCY level (180 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democratic_action_party": "Democratic Action Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_islamic_party_of_malaysia": "Islamic Party of Malaysia", "votes_malaysian_people_s_party": "Malaysian People's Party", "votes_national_front": "National Front", "votes_people_s_justice_front": "People's Justice Front", "votes_sabah_united_party": "Sabah United Party", "votes_sarawak_malaysian_people_s_associati": "Sarawak Malaysian People's Association", "votes_sarawak_united_labour_party": "Sarawak United Labour Party", "votes_spirit_of_46_malay_party": "Spirit of '46 Malay Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 180, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 5, "cast_gt_registered": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:19:07.970713", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.494, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.468, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.26, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.163, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.494, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 1990, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.718, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 1990, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.128, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.282, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.216, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 1990, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.455, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.26, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.26, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.163, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.163, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.204, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.564, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.564, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.53, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.53, "year": 1990, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.172, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 180}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5664fd8b3b33427e874372c2d1364979", "name": "Malaysia 1986 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 177)", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 1986, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia lower-house election 1986, CONSTITUENCY level (177 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democratic_action_party": "Democratic Action Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_malaysian_people_s_socialist_party": "Malaysian People's Socialist Party", "votes_national_front": "National Front", "votes_nationalist_party_of_malaysia": "Nationalist Party of Malaysia", "votes_pan_malaysian_islamic_party": "Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party", "votes_sabah_national_momogun_party": "Sabah National Momogun Party", "votes_sabah_people_s_united_front": "Sabah People's United Front", "votes_sarawak_united_labour_party": "Sarawak United Labour Party", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 177, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:19:04.251520", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.599, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.463, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.27, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.168, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.599, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 1986, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.463, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.067, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 1986, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.132, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.283, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.216, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 1986, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.445, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.111, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.27, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.27, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.168, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.168, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.226, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.226, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.559, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 1986, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.549, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 1986, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.469, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1986, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 177}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d433e1a2988242459af203ed9ba431f0", "name": "Malaysia 1982 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 154)", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 1982, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia lower-house election 1982, CONSTITUENCY level (154 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_barisan_nasional_kongres_india_se_ma": "Barisan Nasional - Kongres India Se-Malaysia", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_bersatu_rakya": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Bersatu Rakyat Sabah", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_makkal_sakti_": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Makkal Sakti Malaysia", "votes_barisan_nasional_persatuan_cina_mala": "Barisan Nasional - Persatuan Cina Malaysia", "votes_barisan_nasional_pertubuhan_kebangsa": "Barisan Nasional - Pertubuhan Kebangsaan Melayu Bersatu", "votes_barisian_nasional_kongres_india_musl": "Barisian Nasional - Kongres India Muslim Malaysia", "votes_democratic_action_party": "Democratic Action Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_islamic_party_of_malaysia": "Islamic Party of Malaysia", "votes_malaysian_people_s_socialist_party": "Malaysian People's Socialist Party", "votes_national_front": "National Front", "votes_pakatan_harapan_parti_amanah_negarah": "Pakatan Harapan - Parti Amanah Negarah", "votes_pakatan_harapan_parti_keadilan_rakya": "Pakatan Harapan - Parti Keadilan Rakyat", "votes_pakatan_harapan_parti_tindakan_demok": "Pakatan Harapan - Parti Tindakan Demokratik", "votes_pakatan_harapan_pertubhuan_kinabalu_": "Pakatan Harapan - Pertubhuan Kinabalu Progresif Bersatu", "votes_perikatan_nasional_parti_gerakan_rak": "Perikatan Nasional - Parti Gerakan Rakyat Malaysia", "votes_perikatan_nasional_parti_islam_se_ma": "Perikatan Nasional - Parti Islam Se-Malaysia", "votes_perikatan_nasional_parti_pribumi_ber": "Perikatan Nasional - Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia", "votes_sabah_united_party": "Sabah United Party", "votes_sarawak_native_people_s_party": "Sarawak Native People's Party", "votes_sarawak_people_s_organization": "Sarawak People's Organization", "votes_social_united_association_party": "Social United Association Party", "votes_united_pasok_nunukragang_national_or": "United Pasok Nunukragang National Organization"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 154, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:19:00.673834", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.805, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.469, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.273, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.175, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.805, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.451, "year": 1982, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.469, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.558, "year": 1982, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.333, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.333, "year": 1982, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.216, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 1982, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.448, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.112, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.175, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.175, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.227, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.227, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.563, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 1982, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.549, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 1982, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.463, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.463, "year": 1982, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 154}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9fafdde342164589b33f762506cc5b82", "name": "Malaysia 1978 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 154)", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 1978, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia lower-house election 1978, CONSTITUENCY level (154 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_barisan_nasional": "Barisan Nasional", "votes_barisan_nasional_barisan_kemajuan_in": "Barisan Nasional - Barisan Kemajuan India Se-Malaysia", "votes_barisan_nasional_kongres_india_se_ma": "Barisan Nasional - Kongres India Se-Malaysia", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_bansa_dayak_s": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak Baru", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_bersatu_rakya": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Bersatu Rakyat Sabah", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_cinta_malaysi": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Cinta Malaysia", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_demokratik_sa": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Demokratik Sabah", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_gerakan_rakya": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Gerakan Rakyat Malaysia", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_kebangsaan_sa": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Kebangsaan Sarawak", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_liberal_demok": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Liberal Demokatik", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_maju_sabah": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Maju Sabah", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_pesaka_bumipu": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_rakyat_bersat": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Rakyat Bersatu Sarawak", "votes_barisan_nasional_persatuan_cina_mala": "Barisan Nasional - Persatuan Cina Malaysia", "votes_barisan_nasional_pertubuhan_kebangsa": "Barisan Nasional - Pertubuhan Kebangsaan Melayu Bersatu", "votes_pakatan_harapan_parti_amanah_negarah": "Pakatan Harapan - Parti Amanah Negarah", "votes_pakatan_harapan_parti_keadilan_rakya": "Pakatan Harapan - Parti Keadilan Rakyat", "votes_pakatan_harapan_parti_tindakan_demok": "Pakatan Harapan - Parti Tindakan Demokratik", "votes_pakatan_harapan_pertubhuan_kinabalu_": "Pakatan Harapan - Pertubhuan Kinabalu Progresif Bersatu", "votes_perikatan_nasional_parti_gerakan_rak": "Perikatan Nasional - Parti Gerakan Rakyat Malaysia", "votes_perikatan_nasional_parti_islam_se_ma": "Perikatan Nasional - Parti Islam Se-Malaysia", "votes_perikatan_nasional_parti_pribumi_ber": "Perikatan Nasional - Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 154, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 9}, "n_stations_flagged": 9, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:18:57.417708", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.806, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.473, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.276, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.194, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.806, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 1978, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.473, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.23, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 1978, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.326, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.332, "year": 1978, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.09, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 1978, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.445, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.111, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.194, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.194, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.209, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.209, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.554, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.554, "year": 1978, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 1978, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.339, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.339, "year": 1978, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.24, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.24, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 154}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "839bbedb4ec348118cfcc0c129deb366", "name": "Malaysia 1974 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 154)", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 1974, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia lower-house election 1974, CONSTITUENCY level (154 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_barisan_nasional_kongres_india_se_ma": "Barisan Nasional - Kongres India Se-Malaysia", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_bansa_dayak_s": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Bansa Dayak Sarawak Baru", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_bersatu_sabah": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Bersatu Sabah", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_gerakan_rakya": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Gerakan Rakyat Malaysia", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_kebangsaan_sa": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Kebangsaan Sarawak", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_pesaka_bumipu": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_rakyat_bersat": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Rakyat Bersatu Sarawak", "votes_barisan_nasional_persatuan_cina_mala": "Barisan Nasional - Persatuan Cina Malaysia", "votes_barisan_nasional_pertubuhan_kebangsa": "Barisan Nasional - Pertubuhan Kebangsaan Melayu Bersatu", "votes_barisan_nasional_pertubuha_2": "Barisan Nasional - Pertubuhan Kebangsaan Sabah Bersatu"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 154, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 47, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 48, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:18:54.038066", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.806, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.469, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.233, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.179, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.806, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 1974, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.469, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.227, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.32, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 1974, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.09, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 1974, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.445, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.111, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.233, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.233, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.179, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.179, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.193, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.552, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.339, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.339, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.249, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 154}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1efe7fc7c0474b6fa4d2d8d8ce6ad771", "name": "Malaysia 1969 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 144)", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 1969, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia lower-house election 1969, CONSTITUENCY level (144 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_barisan_nasional_barisan_jemaah_isla": "Barisan Nasional - Barisan Jemaah Islamiah Se-Malaysia", "votes_barisan_nasional_kongres_india_se_ma": "Barisan Nasional - Kongres India Se-Malaysia", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_bersatu_rakya": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Bersatu Rakyat Jelata Sabah", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_gerakan_rakya": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Gerakan Rakyat Malaysia", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_hizbul_muslim": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Hizbul Muslimin Malaysia", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_kebangsaan_sa": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Kebangsaan Sarawak", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_pesaka_bumipu": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_rakyat_bersat": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Rakyat Bersatu Sarawak", "votes_barisan_nasional_persatuan_cina_mala": "Barisan Nasional - Persatuan Cina Malaysia", "votes_barisan_nasional_pertubuhan_kebangsa": "Barisan Nasional - Pertubuhan Kebangsaan Melayu Bersatu", "votes_barisan_nasional_pertubuha_2": "Barisan Nasional - Pertubuhan Kebangsaan Sabah Bersatu"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 144, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 20}, "n_stations_flagged": 20, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:18:50.631157", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.105, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.875, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.209, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.163, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.105, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.526, "year": 1969, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 1969, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.584, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 1969, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.992, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.498, "year": 1969, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.09, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 1969, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.112, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.209, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.209, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.163, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.163, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.175, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.175, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.558, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.558, "year": 1969, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 1969, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.248, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.248, "year": 1969, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.267, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.267, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 144}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "30e4d72ea8a2461d9559113c2ab4558e", "name": "Malaysia 1964 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 104)", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 1964, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia lower-house election 1964, CONSTITUENCY level (104 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_barisan_nasional": "Barisan Nasional", "votes_barisan_nasional_kongres_india_se_ma": "Barisan Nasional - Kongres India Se-Malaysia", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_gerakan_rakya": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Gerakan Rakyat Malaysia", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_islam_se_mala": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Islam Se-Malaysia", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_pesaka_bumipu": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_progresif_pen": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Progresif Penduduk", "votes_barisan_nasional_parti_rakyat_bersat": "Barisan Nasional - Parti Rakyat Bersatu Sarawak", "votes_barisan_nasional_persatuan_cina_mala": "Barisan Nasional - Persatuan Cina Malaysia", "votes_barisan_nasional_persatuan_cina_saba": "Barisan Nasional - Persatuan Cina Sabah", "votes_barisan_nasional_pertubuhan_kebangsa": "Barisan Nasional - Pertubuhan Kebangsaan Melayu Bersatu", "votes_barisan_nasional_pertubuha_2": "Barisan Nasional - Pertubuhan Kebangsaan Sabah Bersatu", "votes_democratic_action_party": "Democratic Action Party", "votes_parti_perikatan_kongres_india_se_mal": "Parti Perikatan - Kongres India Se-Malaysia", "votes_parti_perikatan_persatuan_cina_malay": "Parti Perikatan - Persatuan Cina Malaysia", "votes_parti_perikatan_pertubuhan_kebangsaa": "Parti Perikatan - Pertubuhan Kebangsaan Melayu Bersatu"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 104, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:18:46.658402", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.107, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.468, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.303, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.212, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 1964, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.396, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 1964, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.219, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 1964, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.058, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.265, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 1964, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.45, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.113, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.303, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.303, "year": 1964, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.212, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.212, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.211, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.211, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.558, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.558, "year": 1964, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 1964, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.248, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.248, "year": 1964, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.269, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.269, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 104}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "30aa7df54dba4b179a19e4be252342f8", "name": "Malaysia 1959 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 104)", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 1959, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malaysia lower-house election 1959, CONSTITUENCY level (104 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_malayan_people_s_socialist_front": "Malayan People's Socialist Front", "votes_pan_malaysian_islamic_party": "Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party", "votes_parti_perikatan_kongres_india_se_mal": "Parti Perikatan - Kongres India Se-Malaysia", "votes_parti_perikatan_persatuan_cina_malay": "Parti Perikatan - Persatuan Cina Malaysia", "votes_parti_perikatan_pertubuhan_kebangsaa": "Parti Perikatan - Pertubuhan Kebangsaan Melayu Bersatu"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 104, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 101, "registered_not_positive": 104}, "n_stations_flagged": 104, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:18:43.647692", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.69, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.616, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.313, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.221, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.69, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 1959, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.616, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 1959, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.213, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 1959, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.331, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.333, "year": 1959, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 1959, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.45, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.113, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.313, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.313, "year": 1959, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.221, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.221, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.205, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.554, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.554, "year": 1959, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 1959, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.248, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.248, "year": 1959, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.269, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.269, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 104}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "38ae9ee15953432e9bb18d6e4fa19ab1", "name": "Malawi 2014 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 193)", "metadata": {"country": "Malawi", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malawi lower-house election 2014, CONSTITUENCY level (193 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_for_democracy": "Alliance for Democracy", "votes_chipani_cha_pfuko": "Chipani cha Pfuko", "votes_democratic_progressive_party": "Democratic Progressive Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_malawi_congress_party": "Malawi Congress Party", "votes_malawi_forum_for_unity_and_developme": "Malawi Forum for Unity and Development", "votes_maravi_people_s_party": "Maravi People\u2019s Party", "votes_national_salvation_front": "National Salvation Front", "votes_new_labour_party": "New Labour Party", "votes_new_rainbow_coalition": "New Rainbow Coalition", "votes_nthanda_congress_party": "Nthanda Congress Party", "votes_people_s_democratic_movement": "People\u2019s Democratic Movement", "votes_people_s_party": "People\u2019s Party", "votes_people_s_transformation_party": "People\u2019s Transformation Party", "votes_progressive_party_movement": "Progressive Party Movement", "votes_umodzi_party": "Umodzi Party", "votes_united_democratic_front": "United Democratic Front", "votes_united_independent_party": "United Independent Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 193, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1, "cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:18:35.140431", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.842, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.823, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.547, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.437, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.842, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.823, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.621, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.503, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.376, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.161, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.3, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.547, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.547, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.437, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.334, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.334, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.754, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.823, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)", "winner_candidate": "Peter Mutharika", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Malawi Congress Party (MCP)", "margin": 9.32, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MWI", "year": 2014, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 193}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7fb5d7943e914f2aa4ade806c75766b1", "name": "Malawi 2009 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 193)", "metadata": {"country": "Malawi", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malawi lower-house election 2009, CONSTITUENCY level (193 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_994": "-994", "votes_alliance_for_democracy": "Alliance for Democracy", "votes_congress_for_democracy": "Congress for Democracy", "votes_congress_for_national_unity": "Congress for National Unity", "votes_democratic_progressive_party": "Democratic Progressive Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_malawi_congress_party": "Malawi Congress Party", "votes_malawi_democratic_party": "Malawi Democratic Party", "votes_malawi_forum_for_unity_and_developme": "Malawi Forum for Unity and Development", "votes_maravi_people_s_party": "Maravi People\u2019s Party", "votes_national_patriotic_front": "National Patriotic Front", "votes_national_unity_party": "National Unity Party", "votes_new_rainbow_coalition": "New Rainbow Coalition", "votes_new_republican_party": "New Republican Party", "votes_people_s_popular_front": "People's Popular Front", "votes_people_s_progressive_movement": "People's Progressive Movement", "votes_people_s_transformation_party": "People\u2019s Transformation Party", "votes_republican_party": "Republican Party", "votes_united_democratic_front": "United Democratic Front"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 193, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:18:31.736107", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.052, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.105, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.5, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.4, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.052, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.105, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.684, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.478, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.061, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.089, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.272, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.039, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.26, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.5, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.5, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.304, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.304, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.632, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)", "winner_candidate": "Bingu wa Mutharika", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Malawi Congress Party (MCP)", "margin": 35.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MWI", "year": 2009, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 193}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ae3cc69d25e64dbc9cbea2aa0516c002", "name": "Malawi 1994 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 177)", "metadata": {"country": "Malawi", "year": 1994, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malawi lower-house election 1994, CONSTITUENCY level (177 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_for_democracy": "Alliance for Democracy", "votes_congress_for_the_second_republic": "Congress for the Second Republic", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_malawi_congress_party": "Malawi Congress Party", "votes_malawi_democratic_party": "Malawi Democratic Party", "votes_malawi_democratic_union": "Malawi Democratic Union", "votes_malawi_national_democratic_party": "Malawi National Democratic Party", "votes_united_democratic_front": "United Democratic Front", "votes_united_front_for_multiparty_democrac": "United Front for Multiparty Democracy"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 177, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:18:28.174097", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.574, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.916, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.463, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.299, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.574, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.052, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.415, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.604, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.26, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.129, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.282, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.008, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.252, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.463, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.463, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.299, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.299, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.248, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.248, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.349, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.349, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.598, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.533, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.533, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.488, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "UDF", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "MCP", "margin": 13.0, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MWI", "year": 1994, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 177}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "55fcb5639e2f4061881fca1888270d66", "name": "Madagascar 2024 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 120)", "metadata": {"country": "Madagascar", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Madagascar lower-house election 2024, CONSTITUENCY level (120 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_fivoi": "FIVOI", "votes_groupement_de_p_p_firaisankina": "GROUPEMENT DE P.P FIRAISANKINA", "votes_groupement_de_p_p_kolektifa_an_ny_ma": "GROUPEMENT DE P.P KOLEKTIFA AN' NY MALAGASY", "votes_groupement_de_p_p_plateforme_isika_r": "GROUPEMENT DE P.P PLATEFORME ISIKA REHETRA MIARAKA @ Andry RAJOELINA", "votes_independant_ainga_vao_ifotony": "INDEPENDANT AINGA VAO IFOTONY", "votes_independant_chabani_nourdine": "INDEPENDANT CHABANI NOURDINE", "votes_independant_eniavisoa": "INDEPENDANT ENIAVISOA", "votes_independant_fano": "INDEPENDANT FANO", "votes_independant_felicien_soronady_randri": "INDEPENDANT FELICIEN SORONADY RANDRIANANTENAINA", "votes_independant_ho_an_ny_vahoaka_sy_ny_t": "INDEPENDANT HO AN NY VAHOAKA SY NY TANINDRAZANA", "votes_independant_lehilahy_mahery": "INDEPENDANT LEHILAHY MAHERY", "votes_independant_liva_rason": "INDEPENDANT LIVA RASON", "votes_independant_mahavitara_sylvestre": "INDEPENDANT MAHAVITARA SYLVESTRE", "votes_independant_olivier_rabeamina": "INDEPENDANT OLIVIER RABEAMINA", "votes_independant_ombilahy_maranitra": "INDEPENDANT OMBILAHY MARANITRA", "votes_independant_rabeharison_bernadrdin": "INDEPENDANT RABEHARISON BERNADRDIN", "votes_independant_raby_savatsarah_ain_hari": "INDEPENDANT RABY SAVATSARAH AIN'HARIMANGA", "votes_independant_raharinirina_sidonie": "INDEPENDANT RAHARINIRINA SIDONIE", "votes_independant_raholijaona_harson": "INDEPENDANT RAHOLIJAONA HARSON", "votes_independant_rakotonirina": "INDEPENDANT RAKOTONIRINA", "votes_independant_rakotoson_hubert": "INDEPENDANT RAKOTOSON HUBERT", "votes_independant_ramanambita_riachade": "INDEPENDANT RAMANAMBITA RIACHADE", "votes_independant_ramose_dadafara_bina": "INDEPENDANT RAMOSE DADAFARA BINA", "votes_independant_rasoanirina_marcelline": "INDEPENDANT RASOANIRINA MARCELLINE", "votes_independant_tetikasa_zavamanitra_ain": "INDEPENDANT TETIKASA ZAVAMANITRA AINGA VAO IFOTONY", "votes_independant_tsaradia_marco": "INDEPENDANT TSARADIA MARCO", "votes_independant_vahoaka_no_hery": "INDEPENDANT VAHOAKA NO HERY", "votes_independent_ramimi_s": "INDEPENDENT RAMIMI'S", "votes_parti_vert_hasin_i_m_kara": "PARTI VERT HASIN' I M/KARA", "votes_vato_fotsy": "Vato fotsy", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 120, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 108}, "n_stations_flagged": 108, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:18:24.979630", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.139, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.218, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.403, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.201, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.139, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.285, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.218, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.304, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.253, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.427, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.357, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.169, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.344, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.336, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.403, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.179, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.179, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.689, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.244, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.244, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.658, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 120}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3a9e49f60f404bc984b83ffc4e5257bc", "name": "Madagascar 2019 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 119)", "metadata": {"country": "Madagascar", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Madagascar lower-house election 2019, CONSTITUENCY level (119 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_andry_sy_rihana_enti_manavotra_an_i_": "ANDRY SY RIHANA ENTI-MANAVOTRA AN'I MADAGASIKARA", "votes_antoka_sy_dinan_ny_nosy": "ANTOKA sy DINAN ny NOSY", "votes_antokom_bahoaka_malagasy": "ANTOKOM-BAHOAKA MALAGASY", "votes_ainga_lavitra_ezaka_ho_an_ny_fanovan": "Ainga Lavitra Ezaka ho an'ny Fanovana", "votes_antokon_ny_kongresy_ho_an_ny_fahafah": "Antokon'ny Kongresy ho an'ny Fahafahan'i Madagasikara", "votes_banjino_ny_repoblika": "BANJINO NY REPOBLIKA", "votes_dina_iombonan_kevitra": "DINA IOMBONAN-KEVITRA", "votes_fitambolagnela_iad": "FITAMBOLAGNELA IAD", "votes_fiovana_ivoaran_ny_eny_ifotony": "Fiovana IVOaran'ny eny Ifotony", "votes_gasy_mifankatia": "GASY MIFANKATIA", "votes_groupement_liberale_de_madagascar": "GROUPEMENT LIBERALE DE MADAGASCAR", "votes_groupe_de_jeunes_malgaches_patriotes": "Groupe de jeunes malgaches patriotes", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_isika_rehetra_miaraka_amin_i_andry_r": "Isika Rehetra Miaraka Amin'i Andry Rajoelina", "votes_isika_rehetra_miaraka_amin_2": "Isika Rehetra miaraka amin'i Andry Rajoelina", "votes_leader_fanilo": "LEADER FANILO", "votes_madagasikara_otronin_ny_malagasy": "MADAGASIKARA OTRONIN'NY MALAGASY", "votes_madagasikara_vina_sy_fanantenana": "MADAGASIKARA VINA SY FANANTENANA", "votes_mahaleo_tena_ambatol": "MAHALEO TENA AMBATOL", "votes_manaranara_fanilo_lo": "MANARANARA FANILO (LO", "votes_malagasy_tia_tanindrazana": "Malagasy Tia Tanindrazana", "votes_malagasy_tonga_saina": "Malagasy Tonga Saina", "votes_mientana_ho_an_ny_demokrasia_ato_mad": "Mientana Ho An Ny Demokrasia Ato Madagasikara", "votes_papa_soul": "PAPA SOUL\u00c9", "votes_plateforme_dinike": "PLATEFORME DINIKE", "votes_parti_social_democrate": "Parti Social Democrate", "votes_refondation_totale_de_madagascar": "REFONDATION TOTALE DE MADAGASCAR", "votes_tanora_maroantsetra_miray": "Tanora Maroantsetra Miray", "votes_tiako_i_madagasikara": "Tiako I Madagasikara", "votes_union_nationale_pour_la_refondation_": "Union Nationale pour la Refondation et la Reconstruction de Madagascar", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 119, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:18:22.130388", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.687, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.478, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.248, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.687, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.731, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.344, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.613, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.007, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.502, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.17, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.467, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.367, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.478, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.478, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.248, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.248, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.214, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.214, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.237, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.237, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.68, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 119}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0c455c7dca8f4f45b16b000645c6fec5", "name": "Madagascar 2013 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 114)", "metadata": {"country": "Madagascar", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Madagascar lower-house election 2013, CONSTITUENCY level (114 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_andrin_i_madagasikara": "ANDRIN I MADAGASIKARA", "votes_antoko_maitso": "ANTOKO MAITSO", "votes_antoko_maitso_hasin_i_madagasikara": "ANTOKO MAITSO HASIN I MADAGASIKARA", "votes_avana": "AVANA", "votes_emma": "EMMA", "votes_fanamby_88": "FANAMBY 88", "votes_fanasina_ho_fampandrosoana": "FANASINA HO FAMPANDROSOANA", "votes_fff": "FFF", "votes_hiaraka_isika": "HIARAKA ISIKA", "votes_leader_fanilo": "LEADER FANILO", "votes_mafi": "MAFI", "votes_mamafisoa": "MAMAFISOA", "votes_mapar": "MAPAR", "votes_mdm": "MDM", "votes_miaraka_prezida_andry_rajoelina": "MIARAKA @ PREZIDA ANDRY RAJOELINA", "votes_miaraka_amin_i_andry_rajoelina": "MIARAKA AMIN I ANDRY RAJOELINA", "votes_miaraka_amin_i_prezida_andry_rajoeli": "MIARAKA AMIN I PREZIDA ANDRY RAJOELINA", "votes_miaraka_amin_ny_prezida_andry_rajoel": "MIARAKA AMIN NY PREZIDA ANDRY RAJOELINA", "votes_miaraka_amin_ny_prezida_an_2": "MIARAKA AMIN'NY PREZIDA ANDRY RAJOELINA", "votes_mmm": "MMM", "votes_monima": "MONIMA", "votes_mouvance_ravalomanana": "MOUVANCE RAVALOMANANA", "votes_movansy_ravalomanana": "MOVANSY RAVALOMANANA", "votes_mts": "MTS", "votes_mts_malagasy_tonga_saina": "MTS MALAGASY TONGA SAINA", "votes_mouvance_ravalomanana_2": "Mouvance RAVALOMANANA", "votes_pnj_mazava": "PNJ MAZAVA", "votes_trano_kasaka": "TRANO KASAKA", "votes_vpm_mmm": "VPM MMM", "votes_zanak_i_dada": "ZANAK I DADA", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 114, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:18:18.389640", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.142, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.245, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.246, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.125, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.142, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.245, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.453, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.454, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.156, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.112, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.278, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.125, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.125, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.126, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.126, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.65, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.198, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.939, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.644, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.644, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": null, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "MDG", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 114}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "064aef8346fc4b8695206c8573efc2c8", "name": "Lesotho 2007 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 80)", "metadata": {"country": "Lesotho", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Lesotho lower-house election 2007, CONSTITUENCY level (80 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_basotho_convention_kobo_tata_ea_": "All Basotho Convention/Kobo Tata ea Basotho", "votes_alliance_of_congress_parties_lpc_bac": "Alliance of Congress Parties (LPC, BAC, BCP)", "votes_basotho_batho_democratic_party": "Basotho Batho Democratic Party", "votes_basotho_congress_party": "Basotho Congress Party", "votes_basotho_democratic_national_party": "Basotho Democratic National Party", "votes_basotho_national_party": "Basotho National Party", "votes_independent_1": "Independent 1", "votes_independent_2": "Independent 2", "votes_independent_3": "Independent 3", "votes_independent_4": "Independent 4", "votes_kopanang_basotho_party": "Kopanang Basotho Party", "votes_lesotho_congress_for_democracy": "Lesotho Congress for Democracy", "votes_lesotho_education_party": "Lesotho Education Party", "votes_lesotho_workers_party": "Lesotho Workers Party", "votes_marematlou_freedom_party": "Marematlou Freedom Party", "votes_national_independent_party": "National Independent Party", "votes_new_lesotho_freedom_party": "New Lesotho Freedom Party", "votes_popular_front_for_democracy_khoeetsa": "Popular Front for Democracy/Khoeetsa ea Sechaba", "votes_united_party": "United Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 80, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 78}, "n_stations_flagged": 78, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:18:15.805493", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.906, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.568, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.419, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.73, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.792, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.698, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.045, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.511, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.715, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.568, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.568, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.419, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.419, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.463, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.463, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.764, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 80}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "88b7565482b6493a9692914cbb24e201", "name": "Lesotho 2002 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 81)", "metadata": {"country": "Lesotho", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Lesotho lower-house election 2002, CONSTITUENCY level (81 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_basotho_congress_party": "Basotho Congress Party", "votes_basotho_national_party": "Basotho National Party", "votes_basutoland_african_congress": "Basutoland African Congress", "votes_christian_democratic_party": "Christian Democratic Party", "votes_independent_1": "Independent 1", "votes_independent_2": "Independent 2", "votes_independent_3": "Independent 3", "votes_kopanang_basotho_party": "Kopanang Basotho Party", "votes_lesotho_communist_party": "Lesotho Communist Party", "votes_lesotho_congress_for_democracy": "Lesotho Congress for Democracy", "votes_lesotho_education_party": "Lesotho Education Party", "votes_lesotho_labour_party_united_democrat": "Lesotho Labour Party/United Democratic Party", "votes_lesotho_people_s_congress": "Lesotho People\u2019s Congress", "votes_lesotho_workers_party": "Lesotho Workers Party", "votes_marematlou_freedom_party": "Marematlou Freedom Party", "votes_national_democratic_party": "National Democratic Party", "votes_national_independent_party": "National Independent Party", "votes_national_progressive_party": "National Progressive Party", "votes_new_lesotho_freedom_party": "New Lesotho Freedom Party", "votes_popular_front_for_democracy_khoeetsa": "Popular Front for Democracy/Khoeetsa ea Sechaba", "votes_sefate_democratic_union": "Sefate Democratic Union", "votes_social_democracy_party": "Social Democracy Party", "votes_united_party": "United Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 81, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:18:12.959663", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.69, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.802, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.377, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.69, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.802, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.313, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.681, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.377, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.377, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.421, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.571, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.691, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 81}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8d34f33a02ea4dcb8158f84047738906", "name": "Kenya 2017 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 337)", "metadata": {"country": "Kenya", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Kenya lower-house election 2017, CONSTITUENCY level (337 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_amani_national_congress": "Amani National Congress", "votes_chama_cha_mashinani": "Chama Cha Mashinani", "votes_chama_cha_uzalendo": "Chama Cha Uzalendo", "votes_citizens_convention_party": "Citizens Convention Party", "votes_democratic_party_of_kenya": "Democratic Party Of Kenya", "votes_economic_freedom_party": "Economic Freedom Party", "votes_federal_party_of_kenya": "Federal Party Of Kenya", "votes_forum_for_restoration_of_democracy_k": "Forum For Restoration Of Democracy- Kenya", "votes_forum_for_restoration_of_d_2": "Forum For Restoration Of Democracy-Kenya", "votes_frontier_alliance_party": "Frontier Alliance Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jubilee_party": "Jubilee Party", "votes_kenya_african_national_union": "Kenya African National Union", "votes_kenya_national_congress": "Kenya National Congress", "votes_kenya_patriots_party": "Kenya Patriots Party", "votes_maendeleo_chap_chap_party": "Maendeleo Chap Chap Party", "votes_mazingira_greens_party_of_kenya": "Mazingira Greens Party Of Kenya", "votes_muungano_party": "Muungano Party", "votes_national_rainbow_coalition": "National Rainbow Coalition", "votes_national_rainbow_coalition_kenya": "National Rainbow Coalition- Kenya", "votes_new_democrats": "New Democrats", "votes_orange_democratic_movement": "Orange Democratic Movement", "votes_party_for_development_and_reform": "Party For Development And Reform", "votes_party_of_national_unity": "Party Of National Unity", "votes_peoples_democratic_party": "Peoples Democratic Party", "votes_progressive_party_of_kenya": "Progressive Party Of Kenya", "votes_the_labour_party_of_kenya": "The Labour Party Of Kenya", "votes_the_national_vision_party": "The National Vision Party", "votes_united_democratic_party": "United Democratic Party", "votes_wiper_democratic_movement_kenya": "Wiper Democratic Movement- Kenya", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 337, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 337, "cast_gt_registered": 335}, "n_stations_flagged": 337, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:18:09.399080", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.985, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.12, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.512, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.408, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.985, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.12, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.53, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.273, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.426, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.588, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.483, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.322, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.322, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.657, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.657, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.773, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.773, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.601, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.601, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 337}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "465710183b234be4a6cca1134eb279f8", "name": "Kenya 2007 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 210)", "metadata": {"country": "Kenya", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Kenya lower-house election 2007, CONSTITUENCY level (210 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_agano_party": "AGANO PARTY", "votes_chama_cha_uzalendo": "CHAMA CHA UZALENDO", "votes_forum_for_the_restoration_of_democra": "FORUM FOR THE RESTORATION OF DEMOCRACY-ASILI", "votes_forum_for_the_restoration__2": "FORUM FOR THE RESTORATION OF DEMOCRACY-KENYA", "votes_kenya_african_democratic_development": "KENYA AFRICAN DEMOCRATIC DEVELOPMENT UNION", "votes_kenya_african_democratic_union_asili": "KENYA AFRICAN DEMOCRATIC UNION-ASILI", "votes_kenya_african_national_union": "KENYA AFRICAN NATIONAL UNION", "votes_kenya_national_congress": "KENYA NATIONAL CONGRESS", "votes_kenya_national_democratic_alliance": "KENYA NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE", "votes_labour_party_of_kenya": "LABOUR PARTY OF KENYA", "votes_mazingira_greens_party_of_kenya": "MAZINGIRA GREENS PARTY OF KENYA", "votes_national_labour_party": "NATIONAL LABOUR PARTY", "votes_national_patriotic_party_of_kenya": "NATIONAL PATRIOTIC PARTY OF KENYA", "votes_national_rainbow_coalition": "NATIONAL RAINBOW COALITION", "votes_new_sisi_kwa_sisi_kenya": "NEW SISI KWA SISI KENYA", "votes_national_rainbow_coalition_kenya_nar": "National Rainbow Coalition-Kenya (Narc-K)", "votes_new_forum_for_restoration_of_democra": "New forum for Restoration of Democracy-Kenya", "votes_orange_democratic_movement": "ORANGE DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT", "votes_orange_democratic_movement_kenya": "ORANGE DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT-KENYA", "votes_party_of_hope": "PARTY OF HOPE", "votes_party_of_independent_candidates_of_k": "PARTY OF INDEPENDENT CANDIDATES OF KENYA", "votes_party_of_national_unity": "PARTY OF NATIONAL UNITY", "votes_republican_alliance_party_of_kenya": "REPUBLICAN ALLIANCE PARTY OF KENYA", "votes_sisi_kwa_sisi_party_of_kenya": "SISI KWA SISI PARTY OF KENYA", "votes_the_independent_party": "THE INDEPENDENT PARTY", "votes_united_democratic_movement": "UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT", "votes_democratic_party": "democratic party", "votes_forum_for_the_restoration__3": "forum for the restoration of democracy-people", "votes_safina": "safina", "votes_social_democratic_party": "social democratic party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 210, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 45}, "n_stations_flagged": 45, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:18:05.746784", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.366, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.843, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.511, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.356, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.366, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.342, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.461, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.589, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.576, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.144, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.23, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.488, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.491, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.511, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.511, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.356, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.356, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.312, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.312, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.617, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.617, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "PNU", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "ODM", "margin": 2.3, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "KEN", "year": 2007, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 210}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a88f9c2a2a0c45baac03c1530b81295b", "name": "Kenya 2002 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 210)", "metadata": {"country": "Kenya", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Kenya lower-house election 2002, CONSTITUENCY level (210 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_chama_cha_majimbo_na_mwangaza": "CHAMA CHA MAJIMBO NA MWANGAZA", "votes_chama_cha_uma_party": "CHAMA CHA UMA PARTY", "votes_economic_independence_party": "ECONOMIC INDEPENDENCE PARTY", "votes_federal_party_of_kenya": "FEDERAL PARTY OF KENYA", "votes_forum_for_the_restoration_of_democra": "FORUM FOR THE RESTORATION OF DEMOCRACY-ASILI", "votes_green_african_party": "GREEN AFRICAN PARTY", "votes_kenya_african_democratic_development": "KENYA AFRICAN DEMOCRATIC DEVELOPMENT UNION", "votes_kenya_african_national_union": "KENYA AFRICAN NATIONAL UNION", "votes_kenya_citizens_congress": "KENYA CITIZENS CONGRESS", "votes_kenya_national_congress": "KENYA NATIONAL CONGRESS", "votes_kenya_national_democratic_alliance": "KENYA NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE", "votes_kenya_patriotic_trust_party": "KENYA PATRIOTIC TRUST PARTY", "votes_kenya_people_s_party": "KENYA PEOPLE'S PARTY", "votes_kenya_social_congress": "KENYA SOCIAL CONGRESS", "votes_labour_party_of_kenya": "LABOUR PARTY OF KENYA", "votes_mass_party_of_kenya": "MASS PARTY OF KENYA", "votes_national_alliance_party": "NATIONAL ALLIANCE PARTY", "votes_national_labour_party": "NATIONAL LABOUR PARTY", "votes_national_progressive_party": "NATIONAL PROGRESSIVE PARTY", "votes_national_rainbow_coalition": "NATIONAL RAINBOW COALITION", "votes_peoples_party_of_kenya": "PEOPLES PARTY OF KENYA", "votes_republican_party_of_kenya": "REPUBLICAN PARTY OF KENYA", "votes_shirikisho_party_of_kenya": "SHIRIKISHO PARTY OF KENYA", "votes_sisi_kwa_sisi_party_of_kenya": "SISI KWA SISI PARTY OF KENYA", "votes_united_agri_party": "UNITED AGRI PARTY", "votes_united_democrats_of_peace_and_integr": "UNITED DEMOCRATS OF PEACE AND INTEGRITY IN KENYA", "votes_united_patriotic_party_of_kenya": "UNITED PATRIOTIC PARTY OF KENYA", "votes_forum_for_the_restoration__2": "forum for the restoration of democracy-people", "votes_safina": "safina", "votes_social_democratic_party": "social democratic party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 210, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:18:00.174332", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.809, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.988, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.419, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.291, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.988, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.747, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.27, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.568, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.144, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.536, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.197, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.299, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.488, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.677, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.419, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.419, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.419, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.291, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.291, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.256, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.256, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.585, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.585, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.73, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.73, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "NRC", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "KANU", "margin": 31.0, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "KEN", "year": 2002, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 210}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3b2b90b5aa9a4f50bb2c6de68d149c88", "name": "Kenya 1969 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 158)", "metadata": {"country": "Kenya", "year": 1969, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Kenya lower-house election 1969, CONSTITUENCY level (158 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_kenya_african_national_union": "Kenya African National Union"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 158, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 149, "registered_not_positive": 2, "cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 150, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:17:55.556218", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.361, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.775, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.2, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.127, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.361, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 1969, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.775, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.444, "year": 1969, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.387, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 1969, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.209, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.503, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.126, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.016, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.254, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.233, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.058, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.2, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.2, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.127, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.127, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.124, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.124, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.291, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.291, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.297, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.297, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.666, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 1969, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.207, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.207, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 158}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fec21f6fabf74b3ab32194a2d497a695", "name": "Japan 2021 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 300)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan lower-house election 2021, CONSTITUENCY level (300 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_constitutional_democratic_party_of_j": "Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan", "votes_democratic_party_for_the_people": "Democratic Party for the People", "votes_japan_first_party": "Japan First Party", "votes_japan_innovation_party": "Japan Innovation Party", "votes_japanese_communist_party": "Japanese Communist Party", "votes_komeito": "Komeito", "votes_liberal_democratic_party": "Liberal Democratic Party", "votes_new": "New", "votes_new_party_to_strengthen_corona_count": "New Party to Strengthen Corona Countermeasures by Change of Government", "votes_no_party_to_support": "No Party to Support", "votes_nothing": "Nothing", "votes_sects": "Sects", "votes_seijika_joshi_48_party": "Seijika Joshi 48 Party", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party", "votes_yamato": "Yamato"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 300, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 11, "registered_not_positive": 11}, "n_stations_flagged": 11, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:17:52.783482", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.858, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.926, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.824, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.736, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.147, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.045, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.045, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 300}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e0cefeb7fdf44431baa2529b10955135", "name": "Japan 2017 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 300)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan lower-house election 2017, CONSTITUENCY level (300 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_party_to_cherish_the_heart_of_japan": "\u3053\u3053\u308d (Party to Cherish the Heart of Japan)", "votes_komieto_komieto": "\u516c\u660e (Komieto) Komieto", "votes_japanese_communist_party": "\u5171\u7523 (Japanese Communist Party)", "votes_new_party": "\u5927\u5730 (New Party)", "votes_party_of_hope": "\u5e0c\u671b (Party of Hope)", "votes_happiness_realization_party": "\u5e78\u798f (Happiness Realization Party)", "votes_": "\u652f\u306a\u3057", "votes_990": "\u7121 (-990)", "votes_social_democratic_party": "\u793e\u6c11 (Social Democratic Party)", "votes_constitutional_democratic_party": "\u7acb\u6c11 (Constitutional Democratic Party)", "votes_innovation_party": "\u7dad\u65b0 (Innovation Party)", "votes_liberal_democratic_party": "\u81ea\u6c11 (Liberal Democratic Party)", "votes__2": "\u8af8\u6d3e"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 300, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 11, "cast_gt_registered": 11}, "n_stations_flagged": 11, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:17:48.315309", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.87, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.933, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.821, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.744, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.789, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.567, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.247, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.744, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.743, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.093, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 300}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c55550083a264277b967782a269ec710", "name": "Japan 2014 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 306)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan lower-house election 2014, CONSTITUENCY level (306 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democratic_party_of_japan": "Democratic Party of Japan", "votes_future_party": "Future Party", "votes_happiness_realization_party": "Happiness Realization Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_innovation_party": "Innovation Party", "votes_japanese_communist_party": "Japanese Communist Party", "votes_komeito": "Komeito", "votes_liberal_democratic_party": "Liberal Democratic Party", "votes_new_renaissance_party": "New Renaissance Party", "votes_party_for_japanese_kokoro": "Party for Japanese Kokoro", "votes_people_s_life_party_taro_yamamoto_an": "People's Life Party & Taro Yamamoto and Friends", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party", "votes_tax_reduction_japan": "Tax Reduction Japan", "votes_world_economic_community_party": "World Economic Community Party", "votes_shinsei_t": "shinsei t\u00f4"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 306, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:17:45.084245", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.887, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.942, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.815, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.739, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.578, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.567, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.235, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.739, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.098, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.098, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 306}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "61830dfae14e4550a07c5933c3359b0a", "name": "Japan 2012 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 311)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan lower-house election 2012, CONSTITUENCY level (311 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_21st_century_japan_restoration_party": "21st Century Japan Restoration Party", "votes_ainu_party": "Ainu Party", "votes_democratic_party_of_japan": "Democratic Party of Japan", "votes_euthanasia_party": "Euthanasia Party", "votes_happiness_realization_party": "Happiness Realization Party", "votes_happiness_realization_party_kagoshim": "Happiness Realization Party - Kagoshima Branch", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_japan_restoration_party": "Japan Restoration Party", "votes_japanese_communist_party": "Japanese Communist Party", "votes_komeito": "Komeito", "votes_liberal_democratic_party": "Liberal Democratic Party", "votes_natural_party": "Natural Party", "votes_new_party_daichi": "New Party Daichi", "votes_new_party_nippon": "New Party Nippon", "votes_new_renaissance_party": "New Renaissance Party", "votes_people_s_new_party": "People's New Party", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party", "votes_tomorrow_party_of_japan": "Tomorrow Party of Japan", "votes_world_economic_community_party": "World Economic Community Party", "votes_your_party": "Your Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 311, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 300}, "n_stations_flagged": 300, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:17:41.907463", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.894, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.947, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.848, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.774, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.947, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.591, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.567, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.202, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.108, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.108, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 311}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "aa79d79a496d468cba2820ccdff571d2", "name": "Japan 2009 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 311)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan lower-house election 2009, CONSTITUENCY level (311 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democratic_party_of_japan": "Democratic Party of Japan", "votes_forest_and_ocean_party": "Forest and Ocean Party", "votes_happiness_realization_party": "Happiness Realization Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_japanese_communist_party": "Japanese Communist Party", "votes_komeito": "Komeito", "votes_liberal_democratic_party": "Liberal Democratic Party", "votes_minor_party": "Minor Party", "votes_new_party_daichi": "New Party Daichi", "votes_new_party_freeway_club": "New Party Freeway Club", "votes_new_party_japan": "New Party Japan", "votes_new_party_nippon": "New Party Nippon", "votes_people_s_new_party": "People's New Party", "votes_reform_club": "Reform Club", "votes_smile_party": "Smile Party", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party", "votes_world_economic_community_party": "World Economic Community Party", "votes_your_party": "Your Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 311, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 300}, "n_stations_flagged": 300, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:17:38.320373", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.892, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.947, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.854, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.779, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.947, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.583, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.478, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.108, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.108, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.924, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 311}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5b1b4ed3a1784681acb7cc80e68b5062", "name": "Japan 2005 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 311)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan lower-house election 2005, CONSTITUENCY level (311 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democratic_party_of_japan": "Democratic Party of Japan", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_japanese_communist_party": "Japanese Communist Party", "votes_komeito": "Komeito", "votes_liberal_democratic_party": "Liberal Democratic Party", "votes_new_party_daichi": "New Party Daichi", "votes_new_party_japan": "New Party Japan", "votes_new_party_nippon": "New Party Nippon", "votes_people_s_new_party": "People's New Party", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party", "votes_world_economic_community_party": "World Economic Community Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 311, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 300}, "n_stations_flagged": 300, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:17:34.665322", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.892, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.946, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.841, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.766, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.937, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.208, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.108, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.108, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 311}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ac4c76b37fd94e1db9eb15c78bc9b71c", "name": "Japan 2003 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 311)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2003, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan lower-house election 2003, CONSTITUENCY level (311 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_assembly_of_independents": "Assembly of Independents", "votes_conservative_new_party": "Conservative New Party", "votes_democratic_party_of_japan": "Democratic Party of Japan", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_japan_nation_party": "Japan Nation Party", "votes_japanese_communist_party": "Japanese Communist Party", "votes_komeito": "Komeito", "votes_liberal_democratic_party": "Liberal Democratic Party", "votes_liberal_league": "Liberal League", "votes_new_deal_party": "New Deal Party", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party", "votes_sonmei": "Sonmei", "votes_world_economic_community_party": "World Economic Community Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 311, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 300, "cast_gt_registered": 300}, "n_stations_flagged": 300, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:17:30.340243", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.814, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.897, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.762, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.814, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.867, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.704, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.983, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.108, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.108, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 311}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b4f82c68592f4ad789b21183048481b0", "name": "Japan 2000 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 311)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2000, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan lower-house election 2000, CONSTITUENCY level (311 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_assembly_of_independents": "Assembly of Independents", "votes_conservative_new_party": "Conservative New Party", "votes_conservative_party": "Conservative Party", "votes_democratic_party_of_japan": "Democratic Party of Japan", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_japanese_communist_party": "Japanese Communist Party", "votes_komeito": "Komeito", "votes_liberal_democratic_party": "Liberal Democratic Party", "votes_liberal_league": "Liberal League", "votes_new_socialist_party": "New Socialist Party", "votes_reform_club": "Reform Club", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party", "votes_jiy_t": "jiy\u00fb t\u00f4", "votes_nihon_shakai_t": "nihon shakai t\u00f4"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 311, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:17:24.278088", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.801, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.901, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.762, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.801, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.901, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.867, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.719, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.989, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.497, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.108, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.108, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 311}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0a67b301a3714e9f8a9b36c52e64a5a7", "name": "Japan 1996 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 311)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 1996, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan lower-house election 1996, CONSTITUENCY level (311 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_citizens_new_party_niigata": "Citizens New Party - Niigata", "votes_culture_forum": "Culture Forum", "votes_democratic_party_of_japan": "Democratic Party of Japan", "votes_democratic_reform_party": "Democratic Reform Party", "votes_green_party": "Green Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_japan_nation_party": "Japan Nation Party", "votes_japanese_communist_party": "Japanese Communist Party", "votes_liberal_democratic_party": "Liberal Democratic Party", "votes_liberal_league": "Liberal League", "votes_new_frontier_party": "New Frontier Party", "votes_new_party_sakigake": "New Party Sakigake", "votes_new_socialist_party": "New Socialist Party", "votes_okinawa_social_mass_party": "Okinawa Social Mass Party", "votes_political_corporation_peace_associat": "Political Corporation Peace Association", "votes_refreshing_kobe_citizens_association": "Refreshing Kobe Citizens Association", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party", "votes_youth_liberal_party": "Youth Liberal Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 311, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:17:18.599122", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.805, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.899, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.759, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.805, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.859, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.7, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.006, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.501, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.755, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.111, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.111, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 311}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5065952639764843b49694b7d495beb6", "name": "Italy 2022 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 152)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Italy lower-house election 2022, CONSTITUENCY level (152 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_europa": "+EUROPA", "votes_alleanza_verdi_e_sinistra": "ALLEANZA VERDI E SINISTRA", "votes_alternativa_per_l_italia_no_green_pa": "ALTERNATIVA PER L'ITALIA - NO GREEN PASS", "votes_azione_italia_viva_calenda": "AZIONE - ITALIA VIVA - CALENDA", "votes_bianche": "BIAnche", "votes_bianche_2": "BIanche", "votes_bianche_3": "Bianche", "votes_forza_italia": "FORZA ITALIA", "votes_fratelli_d_italia_con_giorgia_meloni": "FRATELLI D'ITALIA CON GIORGIA MELONI", "votes_impegno_civico_luigi_di_maio_centro_": "IMPEGNO CIVICO LUIGI DI MAIO - CENTRO DEMOCRATICO", "votes_italexit_per_l_italia": "ITALEXIT PER L'ITALIA", "votes_italia_sovrana_e_popolare": "ITALIA SOVRANA E POPOLARE", "votes_l_italia_del_meridione": "L'ITALIA DEL MERIDIONE", "votes_lega_per_salvini_prem_forza_it_noi_m": "LEGA PER SALVINI PREM.-FORZA IT.-NOI MODERATI-FRAT. D'ITALIA", "votes_lega_per_salvini_premier": "LEGA PER SALVINI PREMIER", "votes_lega_per_salvini_premier_forza_itali": "LEGA PER SALVINI PREMIER - FORZA ITALIA - FRATELLI D'ITALIA", "votes_mastella_noi_di_centro_europeisti": "MASTELLA NOI DI CENTRO EUROPEISTI", "votes_movimento_5_stelle": "MOVIMENTO 5 STELLE", "votes_movimento_associativo_italiani_all_e": "MOVIMENTO ASSOCIATIVO ITALIANI ALL'ESTERO - MAIE", "votes_movimento_delle_liberta": "MOVIMENTO DELLE LIBERTA'", "votes_noi_moderati_lupi_toti_brugnaro_udc": "NOI MODERATI/LUPI - TOTI - BRUGNARO - UDC", "votes_partito_animalista_ucdl_10_volte_meg": "PARTITO ANIMALISTA - UCDL - 10 VOLTE MEGLIO", "votes_partito_comunista_italiano": "PARTITO COMUNISTA ITALIANO", "votes_partito_democratico_italia_democrati": "PARTITO DEMOCRATICO - ITALIA DEMOCRATICA E PROGRESSISTA", "votes_sud_chiama_nord": "SUD CHIAMA NORD", "votes_s_dtiroler_volkspartei_svp_patt": "S\u00dcDTIROLER VOLKSPARTEI (SVP) - PATT", "votes_unione_popolare_con_de_magistris": "UNIONE POPOLARE CON DE MAGISTRIS", "votes_unione_sudamericana_emigrati_italian": "UNIONE SUDAMERICANA EMIGRATI ITALIANI - USEI", "votes_vall_e_d_aoste_autonomie_progr_s_f_d": "VALL\u00c9E D\u2019AOSTE \u2013 AUTONOMIE PROGR\u00c8S F\u00c9D\u00c9RALISME", "votes_vita": "VITA", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 152, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 152}, "n_stations_flagged": 152, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:17:15.312221", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.908, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.842, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.763, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.924, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.134, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 152}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a4aa08fefca044498dee5a53f0590adc", "name": "Italy 2018 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 237)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Italy lower-house election 2018, CONSTITUENCY level (237 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_10_volte_meglio": "10 Volte Meglio", "votes_casapound_italia": "Casapound Italia", "votes_civica_popolare_lorenzin": "Civica Popolare Lorenzin", "votes_forza_italia_ii": "Forza Italia (ii)", "votes_grande_nord": "Grande Nord", "votes_il_popolo_della_famiglia": "Il Popolo Della Famiglia", "votes_italia_agli_italiani": "Italia Agli Italiani", "votes_italia_europa_insieme": "Italia Europa Insieme", "votes_lega": "Lega", "votes_liberi_e_uguali": "Liberi E Uguali", "votes_lista_del_popolo_per_la_costituzione": "Lista Del Popolo Per La Costituzione", "votes_lista_lega_forza_italia_fratelli_d_i": "Lista: Lega - Forza Italia - Fratelli D'Italia", "votes_lista_lega_forza_italia_fr_2": "Lista: Lega, Forza Italia, Fratelli D'Italia Con Giorgia Meloni, Noi Con L'Italia - Udc", "votes_lista_partito_democratico_europa_ita": "Lista: Partito Democratico, +Europa, Italia Europa Insieme, Civica Popolare Lorenzin", "votes_lista_partito_democratico__2": "Lista: Partito Democratico, +Europa, Italia Europa Insieme, Civica Popolare Lorenzin, SVP - PATT", "votes_movimento_5_stelle": "Movimento 5 Stelle", "votes_movimento_associativo_italiani_all_e": "Movimento Associativo Italiani All'Estero", "votes_noi_con_l_italia_udc": "Noi Con L'Italia - UDC", "votes_partito_comunista": "Partito Comunista", "votes_partito_democratico": "Partito Democratico", "votes_partito_repubblicano_italiano_ala": "Partito Repubblicano Italiano - ALA", "votes_partito_valore_umano": "Partito Valore Umano", "votes_per_una_sinistra_rivoluzionaria": "Per Una Sinistra Rivoluzionaria", "votes_pi_europa": "Pi\u00f9 Europa", "votes_potere_al_popolo": "Potere Al Popolo!", "votes_progetto_autodeterminatzione": "Progetto Autodeterminatzione", "votes_svp_patt": "SVP - PATT", "votes_unital": "UNITAL", "votes_usei": "USEI", "votes_fratelli_d_italia": "fratelli d'italia", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 237, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:17:10.769650", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.904, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.963, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.864, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.787, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.621, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.796, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.787, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.186, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 237}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6bc039cde30f429ba93449ad9faf7c46", "name": "Italy 1900 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 499)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 1900, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Italy lower-house election 1900, CONSTITUENCY level (499 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_990": "-990", "votes_992": "-992"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 499, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1, "cast_valid_mismatch": 499, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 499, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:17:06.800074", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.706, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.677, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.307, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.245, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.706, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 1900, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.677, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.801, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 1900, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.749, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 1900, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.731, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.433, "year": 1900, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 1900, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.239, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.307, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.307, "year": 1900, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.245, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.245, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.112, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.112, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 1900, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 1900, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.336, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.336, "year": 1900, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.679, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.679, "year": 1900, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 499}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a00563f8a80c4e99bb3667e0f15d4228", "name": "Italy 1897 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 508)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 1897, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Italy lower-house election 1897, CONSTITUENCY level (508 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_990": "-990", "votes_992": "-992"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 508, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 508}, "n_stations_flagged": 508, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:17:02.668124", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.242, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.698, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.295, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.233, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.242, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 1897, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.698, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 1897, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.423, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 1897, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.031, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.508, "year": 1897, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.731, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.433, "year": 1897, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 1897, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.295, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 1897, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.233, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.233, "year": 1897, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.666, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 1897, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 1897, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.336, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.336, "year": 1897, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.615, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 1897, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 508}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "325e7ff937be4753979cec28a237cbf4", "name": "Italy 1895 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 508)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 1895, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Italy lower-house election 1895, CONSTITUENCY level (508 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_990": "-990", "votes_992": "-992"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 508, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 508}, "n_stations_flagged": 508, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:16:58.152690", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.247, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.689, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.293, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.232, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.247, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 1895, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.689, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 1895, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.413, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 1895, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.036, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.509, "year": 1895, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.731, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.433, "year": 1895, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 1895, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.293, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.293, "year": 1895, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.232, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.232, "year": 1895, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.666, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 1895, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 1895, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.336, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.336, "year": 1895, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.591, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 1895, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 508}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b8937b4f723847dea9578d9c5e6b13b6", "name": "Ireland 1918 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 103)", "metadata": {"country": "Ireland", "year": 1918, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ireland lower-house election 1918, CONSTITUENCY level (103 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independent_nationalist": "Independent Nationalist", "votes_independent_unionist": "Independent Unionist", "votes_labour": "Labour", "votes_labour_unionists": "Labour Unionists", "votes_nationalist": "Nationalist", "votes_sinn_fein": "Sinn Fein", "votes_unionist": "Unionist"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 103, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:16:55.692025", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": 0.273, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.231, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.584, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.396, "year": 1918, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.972, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 1918, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.231, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.231, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.204, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 1918, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.04, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.04, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.642, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.642, "year": 1918, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 103}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8bc27916060f495882d52b9144e7a2e4", "name": "Iran 2012 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 202)", "metadata": {"country": "Iran", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Iran lower-house election 2012, CONSTITUENCY level (202 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_eslah_talab": "Eslah Talab", "votes_individual": "Individual", "votes_istadegi": "Istadegi", "votes_istadegi_eslah_talab": "Istadegi & Eslah Talab", "votes_jebheh_motahed": "Jebheh Motahed", "votes_jebheh_motahed_eslah_talab": "Jebheh Motahed & Eslah Talab", "votes_jebheh_motahed_istadegi": "Jebheh Motahed & Istadegi", "votes_jebheh_motahed_istadegi_eslah_talab": "Jebheh Motahed & Istadegi & Eslah Talab", "votes_jebheh_motahed_istadegi_sedaye_melat": "Jebheh Motahed & Istadegi & Sedaye Melat", "votes_jebheh_motahed_istadegi_se_2": "Jebheh Motahed & Istadegi & Sedaye Melat & Eslah Talab", "votes_jebheh_motahed_paydari": "Jebheh Motahed & Paydari", "votes_jebheh_motahed_paydari_istadegi": "Jebheh Motahed & Paydari & Istadegi", "votes_jebheh_motahed_sedaye_melat": "Jebheh Motahed & Sedaye Melat", "votes_jebheh_motahed_sedaye_melat_eslah_ta": "Jebheh Motahed & Sedaye Melat & Eslah Talab", "votes_mostaghel": "Mostaghel", "votes_paydari": "Paydari", "votes_sedaye_melat": "Sedaye Melat", "votes_sedaye_melat_eslah_talab": "Sedaye Melat & Eslah Talab"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 202, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 202, "registered_not_positive": 202}, "n_stations_flagged": 202, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:16:52.262416", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.296, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.806, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.158, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.121, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.296, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.324, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.806, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.06, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.515, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.621, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.405, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.083, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.492, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.046, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.158, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.158, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.121, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.121, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.167, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.167, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.193, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.146, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.146, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.16, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.16, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "CCA", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Society of Engineers", "margin": 43.44, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "IRN", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 202}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e9ace82fdec2447db8ca8f0dd430d8a2", "name": "India 1971 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 518)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 1971, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "India lower-house election 1971, CONSTITUENCY level (518 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_india_jharkhand_party": "all india jharkhand party", "votes_all_party_hill_leaders_conference": "all party hill leaders conference", "votes_bangla_congress": "bangla congress", "votes_bharatiya_jana_sang": "bharatiya jana sang", "votes_bharatiya_kranti_dal": "bharatiya kranti dal", "votes_communist_party_of_india": "communist party of india", "votes_communist_party_of_india_marxist": "communist party of india (marxist)", "votes_dravida_munnetra_kazhagam": "dravida munnetra kazhagam", "votes_forward_block": "forward block", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_indian_national_congress": "indian national congress", "votes_indian_national_congress_organisatio": "indian national congress (organisation)", "votes_janta_party": "janta party", "votes_kerala_congress": "kerala congress", "votes_muslim_league": "muslim league", "votes_peasants_and_workers_party": "peasants and workers party", "votes_praja_socialist_party": "praja socialist party", "votes_republican_party_of_india": "republican party of india", "votes_republican_party_of_india_khobragade": "republican party of india (khobragade)", "votes_revolutionary_socialist_party": "revolutionary socialist party", "votes_samyukta_socialist_party": "samyukta socialist party", "votes_shiromani_akali_dal": "shiromani akali dal", "votes_shiva_sena": "shiva sena", "votes_shoshit_dal_bihar": "shoshit dal bihar", "votes_socialist_unity_centre_of_india": "socialist unity centre of india", "votes_swatantra_party": "swatantra party", "votes_telangana_praja_samithi": "telangana praja samithi", "votes_united_front_of_nagaland": "united front of nagaland", "votes_utkal_congress": "utkal congress", "votes_vishal_haryana": "vishal haryana", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 518, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:16:36.775784", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.296, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.852, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.618, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.458, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.296, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 1971, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.595, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.514, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 1971, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.449, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 1971, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.112, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 1971, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.458, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.458, "year": 1971, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.388, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 1971, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.725, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.725, "year": 1971, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 1971, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.359, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.359, "year": 1971, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 1971, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 518}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bf9941a1454a4cb3b74f0b8a18d0972a", "name": "India 1967 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 520)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 1967, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "India lower-house election 1967, CONSTITUENCY level (520 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_akali_dal_master_tara_singh": "akali dal - master tara singh", "votes_akali_dal_sant_fateh_singh_group": "akali dal - sant fateh singh group", "votes_all_party_hill_leaders_conference": "all party hill leaders conference", "votes_bangla_congress": "bangla congress", "votes_bharatiya_jana_sang": "bharatiya jana sang", "votes_communist_party_of_india": "communist party of india", "votes_communist_party_of_india_marxist": "communist party of india (marxist)", "votes_democratic_national_conference": "democratic national conference", "votes_dravida_munnetra_kazhagam": "dravida munnetra kazhagam", "votes_forward_bloc": "forward bloc", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_indian_national_congress": "indian national congress", "votes_jammu_kashmir_national_conference": "jammu & kashmir national conference", "votes_jana_congress": "jana congress", "votes_jana_kranti_dal": "jana kranti dal", "votes_kerala_congress": "kerala congress", "votes_muslim_leage": "muslim leage", "votes_nagaland_nationalist_organisation": "nagaland nationalist organisation", "votes_peasants_workers_party": "peasants & workers party", "votes_peoples_front": "peoples front", "votes_praja_socialist_party": "praja socialist party", "votes_republican_party_of_india": "republican party of india", "votes_samyukta_socialist_party": "samyukta socialist party", "votes_swatantra_party": "swatantra party", "votes_united_goans_furtadd_group": "united goans - furtadd group", "votes_united_goans_seqveria_group": "united goans - seqveria group"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 520, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:16:31.854414", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.758, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.841, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.66, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.502, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.758, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 1967, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1967, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.586, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 1967, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.227, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 1967, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.449, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1967, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 1967, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.116, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.029, "year": 1967, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.66, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 1967, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.502, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.502, "year": 1967, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.407, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.407, "year": 1967, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.729, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 1967, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 1967, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.293, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.293, "year": 1967, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 1967, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 520}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "232cb4122aae436b98098503a7a1a71f", "name": "India 1962 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 494)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 1962, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "India lower-house election 1962, CONSTITUENCY level (494 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_abc": "abc", "votes_akali_dal": "akali dal", "votes_bharatiya_jana_sang": "bharatiya jana sang", "votes_communist_party_of_india": "communist party of india", "votes_dravida_munetra_kazhagam": "dravida munetra kazhagam", "votes_eastern_indian_tribal_union": "eastern indian tribal union", "votes_forward_block": "forward block", "votes_gantantra_parishad": "gantantra parishad", "votes_gorkha_league": "gorkha league", "votes_haryana_lok_samiti": "haryana lok samiti", "votes_hindu_mahasabha": "hindu mahasabha", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_indian_national_congress": "indian national congress", "votes_lok_sewak_sangh": "lok sewak sangh", "votes_muslim_league": "muslim league", "votes_nutan_maha_gujarat_janta_parisha": "nutan maha gujarat janta parisha", "votes_peasant_worker_party": "peasant worker party", "votes_praja_socialist_party": "praja socialist party", "votes_ram_rajya_parishad": "ram rajya parishad", "votes_republican_party_of_india": "republican party of india", "votes_revolutionary_socialist_party": "revolutionary socialist party", "votes_socialist": "socialist", "votes_socialist_labour": "socialist labour", "votes_swatantra_party": "swatantra party", "votes_tamil_national_party": "tamil national party", "votes_we_tamil": "we tamil"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 494, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:16:27.028777", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.757, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.851, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.655, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.501, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.757, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.827, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.532, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.449, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 1962, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.114, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.029, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.655, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 1962, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.501, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.501, "year": 1962, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.403, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 1962, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.735, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 1962, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 1962, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.146, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.146, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 1962, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 494}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f1ffb7877d86443f9d4087e83a626ffc", "name": "India 1951 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 401)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 1951, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "India lower-house election 1951, CONSTITUENCY level (401 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_akhil_bharatiya_hindu_mahasabha": "akhil bharatiya hindu mahasabha", "votes_akhil_bharatiya_ram_rajya_parishad": "akhil bharatiya ram rajya parishad", "votes_all_india_bhartiya_jan_sangh": "all india bhartiya jan sangh", "votes_all_india_gantantra_parishad": "all india gantantra parishad", "votes_all_india_republican_party": "all india republican party", "votes_all_india_scheduled_caste_federation": "all india scheduled caste federation", "votes_chota_nagpur_santhal_parganas_janta_": "chota nagpur santhal parganas janta party", "votes_common_weal_party": "common weal party", "votes_communist_party_of_india": "communist party of india", "votes_forward_bloc_marxist_group": "forward bloc (marxist group)", "votes_forward_bloc_ruikar_group": "forward bloc (ruikar group)", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_indian_national_congress": "indian national congress", "votes_jharkhand_party": "jharkhand party", "votes_kamgar_kisan_paksha": "kamgar kisan paksha", "votes_kerala_socialist_party": "kerala socialist party", "votes_kisan_mazdoor_praja_party": "kisan mazdoor praja party", "votes_krishikar_lok_party": "krishikar lok party", "votes_lok_sewak_sangh": "lok sewak sangh", "votes_peasants_workers_party": "peasants & workers party", "votes_peoples_democratic_front": "peoples democratic front", "votes_revolutionary_socialist_party": "revolutionary socialist party", "votes_s_k_paksha": "s.k. paksha", "votes_shiromani_akali_dal": "shiromani akali dal", "votes_socialist_party": "socialist party", "votes_the_tamil_nad_toilers_party": "the tamil nad toilers party", "votes_travancore_tamil_nad_congress_party": "travancore tamil nad congress party", "votes_tribal_sangha": "tribal sangha", "votes_u_p_praja_party": "u.p. praja party", "votes_zamindar_party": "zamindar party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 401, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 396, "registered_not_positive": 401}, "n_stations_flagged": 401, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:16:22.486932", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.756, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.849, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.312, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.286, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.756, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1951, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1951, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1951, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.509, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 1951, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.449, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1951, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 1951, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.122, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 1951, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.312, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.312, "year": 1951, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.286, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.286, "year": 1951, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.22, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.22, "year": 1951, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 1951, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 1951, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.146, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.146, "year": 1951, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 1951, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 401}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dced7c4127964b8baafb7494f14abb9a", "name": "Hungary 2022 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 107)", "metadata": {"country": "Hungary", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Hungary lower-house election 2022, CONSTITUENCY level (107 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_a_mi_p_rtunk": "A MI P\u00c1RTUNK", "votes_bolg_r_orsz_gos_nkorm_nyzat": "BOLG\u00c1R ORSZ\u00c1GOS \u00d6NKORM\u00c1NYZAT", "votes_fidesz_kdnp": "FIDESZ+KDNP", "votes_magyar_k_tfark_kutya_p_rt": "MAGYAR K\u00c9TFARK\u00da KUTYA P\u00c1RT", "votes_magyar_liber_lis_p_rt_liber_lisok": "MAGYAR LIBER\u00c1LIS P\u00c1RT - LIBER\u00c1LISOK", "votes_magyar_munk_sp_rt_igen_szolidarit_s_": "MAGYAR MUNK\u00c1SP\u00c1RT + IGEN SZOLIDARIT\u00c1S MAGYARORSZ\u00c1G\u00c9RT MOZGALOM", "votes_magyar_szeg_nyek_s_dolgoz_k_demokrat": "MAGYAR SZEG\u00c9NYEK \u00c9S DOLGOZ\u00d3K DEMOKRATIKUS SZERVEZETE", "votes_magyarorsz_gi_g_r_g_k_orsz_gos": "MAGYARORSZ\u00c1GI G\u00d6R\u00d6G\u00d6K ORSZ\u00c1GOS", "votes_mi_haz_nk_mozgalom": "MI HAZ\u00c1NK MOZGALOM", "votes_magyarorsz_gi_n_metek_orsz_gos_nkorm": "Magyarorsz\u00e1gi N\u00e9metek Orsz\u00e1gos \u00d6nkorm\u00e1nyzat", "votes_magyarorsz_gi_rom_nok_orsz_gos_nkorm": "Magyarorsz\u00e1gi Rom\u00e1nok Orsz\u00e1gos \u00d6nkorm\u00e1nyzat\u00e1t", "votes_megold_s_mozgalom": "Megold\u00e1s Mozgalom", "votes_norm_lis_let_p_rtja": "NORM\u00c1LIS \u00c9LET P\u00c1RTJA", "votes_orsz_gos_horv_t_nkorm_nyzat": "ORSZ\u00c1GOS HORV\u00c1T \u00d6NKORM\u00c1NYZAT", "votes_orsz_gos_lengyel_nkorm_nyzat": "ORSZ\u00c1GOS LENGYEL \u00d6NKORM\u00c1NYZAT", "votes_orsz_gos_szlov_n_nkorm_nyzat": "ORSZ\u00c1GOS SZLOV\u00c9N \u00d6NKORM\u00c1NYZAT", "votes_orsz_gos_rm_ny_nkorm_nyzat": "ORSZ\u00c1GOS \u00d6RM\u00c9NY \u00d6NKORM\u00c1NYZAT", "votes_polg_ri_v_lasz": "POLG\u00c1RI V\u00c1LASZ", "votes_szerb_orsz_gos_nkorm_nyzat": "Szerb Orsz\u00e1gos \u00d6nkorm\u00e1nyzat", "votes_ukr_n_orsz_gos_nkorm_nyzat": "UKR\u00c1N ORSZ\u00c1GOS \u00d6NKORM\u00c1NYZAT", "votes_ukr_n_orsz_gos_nkorm_nyzat_2": "Ukr\u00e1n Orsz\u00e1gos \u00d6nkorm\u00e1nyzat", "votes_united_for_hungary_jobbik_mszp_dialo": "United for Hungary (Jobbik, MSZP, Dialogue, DK, LMP, Momentum)", "votes_val_di_demokrata_p_rt": "VAL\u00d3DI DEMOKRATA P\u00c1RT", "votes_z_ldek_p_rtja": "Z\u00d6LDEK P\u00c1RTJA", "votes_f_ggetlen": "f\u00fcggetlen"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 107, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:16:20.045468", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.355, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.757, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.447, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.335, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.355, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.589, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.757, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.186, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.546, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.287, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.348, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.087, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.447, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.447, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.335, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.317, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.317, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.632, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.505, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 107}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "785e99641ceb4ef0ada8b6f9d8405064", "name": "Hungary 2018 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 107)", "metadata": {"country": "Hungary", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Hungary lower-house election 2018, CONSTITUENCY level (107 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_a_haza_p_rtja": "A HAZA P\u00c1RTJA", "votes_csp": "CSP", "votes_demokrata_p_rt": "DEMOKRATA P\u00c1RT", "votes_dk": "DK", "votes_egy_tt": "EGY\u00dcTT", "votes_eu_rom": "EU.ROM", "votes_fidesz_kdnp": "FIDESZ, KDNP", "votes_f_ggetlen": "F\u00fcggetlen", "votes_ir_nyt": "IR\u00c1NYT\u0170", "votes_jobbik": "JOBBIK", "votes_k_ssz": "K\u00d6SSZ", "votes_k_z_s_nevez": "K\u00d6Z\u00d6S NEVEZ\u0150", "votes_lend_lettel": "LEND\u00dcLETTEL", "votes_lmp": "LMP", "votes_magyarorsz_gi_n_metek_orsz_gos_nkorm": "MAGYARORSZ\u00c1GI N\u00c9METEK ORSZ\u00c1GOS \u00d6NKORM\u00c1NYZATA", "votes_mcp": "MCP", "votes_medete_p_rt": "MEDETE P\u00c1RT", "votes_mi_p": "MI\u00c9P", "votes_mkkp": "MKKP", "votes_momentum": "MOMENTUM", "votes_mszp_p_rbesz_d": "MSZP, P\u00c1RBESZ\u00c9D", "votes_munk_sp_rt": "MUNK\u00c1SP\u00c1RT", "votes_np": "NP", "votes_orsz_gos_horv_t_nkorm_nyzat": "ORSZ\u00c1GOS HORV\u00c1T \u00d6NKORM\u00c1NYZAT", "votes_orsz_gos_roma_nkorm_nyzat": "ORSZ\u00c1GOS ROMA \u00d6NKORM\u00c1NYZAT", "votes_rend_p_rt": "REND P\u00c1RT", "votes_sem": "SEM", "votes_szem_p_rt": "SZEM P\u00c1RT", "votes_tenni_akar_s_mozgalom": "TENNI AKAR\u00c1S MOZGALOM", "votes_sszefog_s_p_rt": "\u00d6SSZEFOG\u00c1S P\u00c1RT", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 107, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:16:16.803219", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.404, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.426, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.481, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.373, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.404, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.601, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.426, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.25, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.204, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.441, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.182, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.481, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.344, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.344, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.72, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.72, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.468, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.468, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.584, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Fidesz", "winner_candidate": "Janos Ader", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 46.23, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "HUN", "year": 2017, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 107}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "336b64bc782f457b93e347a6eb503eab", "name": "Hungary 2014 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 107)", "metadata": {"country": "Hungary", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Hungary lower-house election 2014, CONSTITUENCY level (107 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_4k": "4k!", "votes_a_haza_nem_elad_mozgalom_p_rt": "a haza nem elad\u00f3 mozgalom p\u00e1rt", "votes_egy_tt_2014": "egy\u00fctt 2014", "votes_el_gedetlenek_p_rtja": "el\u00e9gedetlenek p\u00e1rtja", "votes_fidesz_kdnp": "fidesz-kdnp", "votes_f_ggetlen_kisgazdap_rt": "f\u00fcggetlen kisgazdap\u00e1rt", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_j_l_t_s_szabads_g_demokrata_k_z_ss_g": "j\u00f3l\u00e9t \u00e9s szabads\u00e1g demokrata k\u00f6z\u00f6ss\u00e9g", "votes_kisgazdap_rt_mi_p": "kisgazdap\u00e1rt + mi\u00e9p", "votes_k_z_ss_g_a_t_rsadalmi_igazs_goss_g_r": "k\u00f6z\u00f6ss\u00e9g a t\u00e1rsadalmi igazs\u00e1goss\u00e1g\u00e9rt n\u00e9pp\u00e1rt", "votes_magyar_gazdas_g_p_rt": "magyar gazdas\u00e1g p\u00e1rt", "votes_magyar_munk_sp_rt": "magyar munk\u00e1sp\u00e1rt", "votes_magyar_szoci_ldemokrata_p_rt": "magyar szoci\u00e1ldemokrata p\u00e1rt", "votes_magyar_szoci_ldemokrat_k_p_rtja": "magyar szoci\u00e1ldemokrat\u00e1k p\u00e1rtja", "votes_magyarorsz_gi_cig_nyp_rt": "magyarorsz\u00e1gi cig\u00e1nyp\u00e1rt", "votes_magyarorsz_gi_n_metek_orsz_gos_nkorm": "magyarorsz\u00e1gi n\u00e9metek orsz\u00e1gos \u00f6nkorm\u00e1nyzat", "votes_movement_for_a_better_hungary": "movement for a better hungary", "votes_orsz_gos_horv_t_nkorm_nyzat": "orsz\u00e1gos horv\u00e1t \u00f6nkorm\u00e1nyzat", "votes_orsz_gos_roma_nkorm_nyzat": "orsz\u00e1gos roma \u00f6nkorm\u00e1nyzat", "votes_politics_can_be_different": "politics can be different", "votes_seres_m_ria_sz_vets_gesei": "seres m\u00e1ria sz\u00f6vets\u00e9gesei", "votes_sportos_s_eg_szs_ges_magyarorsz_g_rt": "sportos \u00e9s eg\u00e9szs\u00e9ges magyarorsz\u00e1g\u00e9rt p\u00e1rt", "votes_szlov_k_lista": "szlov\u00e1k lista", "votes_szocialdemokrata_part": "szocialdemokrata part", "votes_unity_party": "unity party", "votes_z_ldek_p_rtja": "z\u00f6ldek p\u00e1rtja", "votes_lol_nc_magyarorsz_g_rt": "\u00e9lol\u00e1nc magyarorsz\u00e1g\u00e9rt", "votes_sszefog_s": "\u00f6sszefog\u00e1s", "votes_j_dimenzi_p_rt": "\u00faj dimenzi\u00f3 p\u00e1rt", "votes_j_magyarorsz_g_p_rt": "\u00faj magyarorsz\u00e1g p\u00e1rt", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 107, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:16:13.789375", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.954, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.734, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.669, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.521, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.734, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.074, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.767, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.668, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.319, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.521, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.505, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.442, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 107}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fe31fac3b6164032bef228b4c5e155e9", "name": "Hungary 2010 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 197)", "metadata": {"country": "Hungary", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Hungary lower-house election 2010, CONSTITUENCY level (197 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_mcf_roma_sszefog_s_p_rt": "MCF Roma \u00d6sszefog\u00e1s P\u00e1rt", "votes_association_for_somogy": "association for somogy", "votes_civil_movement": "civil movement", "votes_fidesz_mpp": "fidesz - mpp", "votes_fidesz_mpp_kdnp": "fidesz - mpp - kdnp", "votes_fidesz_mpp_kdnp_vp": "fidesz - mpp - kdnp - vp", "votes_f_ggetlen_kisgazdap_rt": "f\u00fcggetlen kisgazdap\u00e1rt", "votes_green_left": "green left", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_magyar_demokrata_f_rum": "magyar demokrata f\u00f3rum", "votes_magyar_igazs_g_s_let_p_rtja": "magyar igazs\u00e1g \u00e9s \u00e9let p\u00e1rtja", "votes_magyar_szocialista_p_rt": "magyar szocialista p\u00e1rt", "votes_magyar_szoci_ldemokrata_p_rt": "magyar szoci\u00e1ldemokrata p\u00e1rt", "votes_mdf_afd": "mdf - afd", "votes_mesz": "mesz", "votes_movement_for_a_better_hungary": "movement for a better hungary", "votes_munk_sp_rt": "munk\u00e1sp\u00e1rt", "votes_others": "others", "votes_politics_can_be_different": "politics can be different", "votes_unity_party": "unity party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 197, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:16:10.683761", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.887, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.939, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.808, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.677, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.587, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.623, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.35, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.35, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Fidesz", "winner_candidate": "Pal Schmitt", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Hungarian Socialist Party", "margin": 52.8, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "HUN", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 197}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a15071bce30041aabf6dc035389fab00", "name": "Hungary 2006 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 197)", "metadata": {"country": "Hungary", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Hungary lower-house election 2006, CONSTITUENCY level (197 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_centrum": "Centrum", "votes_christian_democratic_party": "Christian Democratic Party", "votes_fidesz_hungarian_civic_union": "FIDESZ-Hungarian Civic Union", "votes_f_ggetlen_kisgazda_nemzeti_e_p": "F\u00fcggetlen Kisgazda Nemzeti E.P", "votes_f_ggetlen_kisgazdap_rt": "F\u00fcggetlen Kisgazdap\u00e1rt", "votes_mcf_roma_sszefog_s_p_rt": "MCF Roma \u00d6sszefog\u00e1s P\u00e1rt", "votes_mi_p_jobbik": "MI\u00c9P\u00adJobbik", "votes_party_of_greens": "Party of Greens", "votes_alliance_of_greens": "alliance of greens", "votes_association_for_somogy": "association for somogy", "votes_center_party": "center party", "votes_christian_democratic_party_2": "christian democratic party", "votes_fidesz_mpp": "fidesz - mpp", "votes_f_ggetlen_kisgazdap_rt_2": "f\u00fcggetlen kisgazdap\u00e1rt", "votes_hungarian_provincial_party": "hungarian provincial party", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_live_chain_for_hungary": "live chain for hungary", "votes_magyar_demokrata_f_rum": "magyar demokrata f\u00f3rum", "votes_magyar_igazs_g_s_let_p_rtja": "magyar igazs\u00e1g \u00e9s \u00e9let p\u00e1rtja", "votes_magyar_szocialista_p_rt": "magyar szocialista p\u00e1rt", "votes_mdf_fidesz_mpp_kdnp": "mdf - fidesz - mpp - kdnp", "votes_mdf_nyup": "mdf - nyup", "votes_mszp_szdsz": "mszp - szdsz", "votes_munk_sp_rt": "munk\u00e1sp\u00e1rt", "votes_nyugdijasok_partja": "nyugdijasok partja", "votes_party_of_equal_chance": "party of equal chance", "votes_social_green_party_of_hungary": "social green party of hungary", "votes_szabad_demokrat_k_sz_vets_ge": "szabad demokrat\u00e1k sz\u00f6vets\u00e9ge", "votes_szocialdemokrata_part": "szocialdemokrata part", "votes_union_of_hungarians_one_for_another": "union of hungarians one for another", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 197, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 23, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 24, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:16:06.595576", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.892, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.609, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.831, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.742, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.594, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.263, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.406, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.742, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.274, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.274, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "Laslo Solyom", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Hungarian Socialist Party", "margin": 0.8, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "HUN", "year": 2005, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 197}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b85258c97b5e4a288c9993887a00200a", "name": "Hungary 2002 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 197)", "metadata": {"country": "Hungary", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Hungary lower-house election 2002, CONSTITUENCY level (197 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anti_corruption_civc_democratic_part": "anti-corruption civc democratic party", "votes_center_of_solidarity_for_hungary": "center of solidarity for hungary", "votes_democratic_party_of_hungarian_roma": "democratic party of hungarian roma", "votes_fiatal_demokrat_k_sz_vets_ge": "fiatal demokrat\u00e1k sz\u00f6vets\u00e9ge", "votes_fidesz_mdf": "fidesz - mdf", "votes_f_ggetlen_kisgazdap_rt": "f\u00fcggetlen kisgazdap\u00e1rt", "votes_f_ggetlen_magyar_demokrata_p_rt": "f\u00fcggetlen magyar demokrata p\u00e1rt", "votes_hungarian_association_for_sustainabi": "hungarian association for sustainability", "votes_hungarian_roma_party": "hungarian roma party", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_magyar_igazs_g_s_let_p_rtja": "magyar igazs\u00e1g \u00e9s \u00e9let p\u00e1rtja", "votes_magyar_szocialista_munk_sp_rt": "magyar szocialista munk\u00e1sp\u00e1rt", "votes_magyar_szocialista_p_rt": "magyar szocialista p\u00e1rt", "votes_magyarosz_gi_z_ld_p_rt": "magyarosz\u00e1gi z\u00f6ld p\u00e1rt", "votes_mszp_mszdp": "mszp - mszdp", "votes_mszp_szdsz": "mszp - szdsz", "votes_munk_sp_rt": "munk\u00e1sp\u00e1rt", "votes_new_left_party": "new left party", "votes_nyugdijasok_partja": "nyugdijasok partja", "votes_others": "others", "votes_pest_1601": "pest 1601", "votes_reform_smallholders_party": "reform smallholders' party", "votes_smallholders_party": "smallholders' party", "votes_szabad_demokrat_k_sz_vets_ge": "szabad demokrat\u00e1k sz\u00f6vets\u00e9ge", "votes_szocialdemokrata_part": "szocialdemokrata part", "votes_united_party_of_hungarian_entreprene": "united party of hungarian entrepreneurs"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 197, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 53, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 54, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:16:03.312212", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.811, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.463, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.842, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.755, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.463, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.794, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.263, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.585, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.755, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.703, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.277, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.277, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 197}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "eed232ccd0f2401ebb70eabb13764c9d", "name": "Hungary 1998 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 197)", "metadata": {"country": "Hungary", "year": 1998, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Hungary lower-house election 1998, CONSTITUENCY level (197 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_of_independent_citoyens": "alliance of independent citoyens", "votes_association_of_independents": "association of independents", "votes_democratic_party_of_hungarian_roma": "democratic party of hungarian roma", "votes_fidesz_mpp": "fidesz - mpp", "votes_forum_of_national_minorities": "forum of national minorities", "votes_f_ggetlen_kisgazdap_rt": "f\u00fcggetlen kisgazdap\u00e1rt", "votes_hungarian_democratic_people_s_party": "hungarian democratic people's party", "votes_hungarian_welfare_alliance": "hungarian welfare alliance", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_kereszt_nydemokrata_n_pp_rt": "kereszt\u00e9nydemokrata n\u00e9pp\u00e1rt", "votes_magyar_anyak_nemzeti_partja": "magyar anyak nemzeti partja", "votes_magyar_demokrata_f_rum": "magyar demokrata f\u00f3rum", "votes_magyar_igazs_g_s_let_p_rtja": "magyar igazs\u00e1g \u00e9s \u00e9let p\u00e1rtja", "votes_magyar_szocialista_munk_sp_rt": "magyar szocialista munk\u00e1sp\u00e1rt", "votes_magyar_szocialista_p_rt": "magyar szocialista p\u00e1rt", "votes_magyar_szoci_ldemokrata_p_rt": "magyar szoci\u00e1ldemokrata p\u00e1rt", "votes_magyarosz_gi_z_ld_p_rt": "magyarosz\u00e1gi z\u00f6ld p\u00e1rt", "votes_munk_sp_rt": "munk\u00e1sp\u00e1rt", "votes_new_union": "new union", "votes_new_union_vp": "new union - vp", "votes_others": "others", "votes_party_of_life_on_earth": "party of life on earth", "votes_social_coalition": "social coalition", "votes_social_green_party_of_hungary": "social green party of hungary", "votes_szabad_demokrat_k_sz_vets_ge": "szabad demokrat\u00e1k sz\u00f6vets\u00e9ge", "votes_szocialdemokrata_part": "szocialdemokrata part", "votes_union_for_hungary": "union for hungary", "votes_v_llalkoz_k_part": "v\u00e1llalkoz\u00f3k part", "votes_women_s_party": "women's party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 197, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 2, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:16:00.216082", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.822, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.468, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.84, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.754, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.8, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.657, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.263, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.754, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.245, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.245, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 197}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d24f39b042e041e0a7642410db260307", "name": "Ghana 2016 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 275)", "metadata": {"country": "Ghana", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ghana lower-house election 2016, CONSTITUENCY level (275 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_people_s_congress": "All People's Congress", "votes_democratic_people_s_party": "Democratic People's Party", "votes_great_consolidated_popular_party": "Great Consolidated Popular Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_national_democratic_congress": "National Democratic Congress", "votes_national_democratic_party": "National Democratic Party", "votes_new_patriotic_party": "New Patriotic Party", "votes_people_s_national_convention": "People's National Convention", "votes_progressive_people_s_party": "Progressive People's Party", "votes_united_front_party": "United Front Party", "votes_united_progressive_party": "United Progressive Party", "votes_convention_people_s_party": "convention people's party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 275, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:15:54.958941", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.719, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.434, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.725, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.61, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.719, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.434, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.285, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.643, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.289, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.527, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.243, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.725, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.725, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.61, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.928, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.615, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "New Patriotic Party (NPP)", "winner_candidate": "Nana Akufo-Addo", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "National Democratic Congress (NDC)", "margin": 9.45, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "GHA", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 275}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "317328f9a27349dabcbd33b0f7273d1d", "name": "Ghana 2012 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 275)", "metadata": {"country": "Ghana", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ghana lower-house election 2012, CONSTITUENCY level (275 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_convention_people_s_party": "Convention People's Party", "votes_democratic_people_s_party": "Democratic People's Party", "votes_ghana_freedom_party": "Ghana Freedom Party", "votes_great_consolidated_popular_party": "Great Consolidated Popular Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_people_s_party": "Independent People\u2019s Party", "votes_inter_party_cooperation": "Inter-Party Cooperation", "votes_national_democratic_congress": "National Democratic Congress", "votes_national_democratic_party": "National Democratic Party", "votes_new_patriotic_party": "New Patriotic Party", "votes_new_vision_party": "New Vision Party", "votes_people_s_national_convention": "People's National Convention", "votes_progressive_people_s_party": "Progressive People\u2019s Party", "votes_united_front_party": "United Front Party", "votes_united_renaissance_party": "United Renaissance Party", "votes_yes_people_s_party": "Yes People\u2019s Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 275, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:15:52.022858", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.549, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.626, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.771, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.661, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.549, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.626, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.276, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.605, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.518, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.098, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.771, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.566, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.566, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "NDC", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "NPP", "margin": 2.99, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "GHA", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 275}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "97c63df90d774ebdafb0c665d81c6745", "name": "Germany 2021 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 315)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 2021, CONSTITUENCY level (315 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_allianz_f_r_menschenrechte_tier_und_": "Allianz f\u00fcr Menschenrechte, Tier- und Naturschutz", "votes_alternative_f_r_deutschland": "Alternative f\u00fcr Deutschland", "votes_basisdemokratische_partei_deutschlan": "Basisdemokratische Partei Deutschland", "votes_bayernpartei": "Bayernpartei", "votes_b_ndnis_90_die_gr_nen": "B\u00fcndnis 90/Die Gr\u00fcnen", "votes_b_ndnis_c_christen_f_r_deutschland": "B\u00fcndnis C - Christen f\u00fcr Deutschland", "votes_christlich_demokratische_union": "Christlich Demokratische Union", "votes_christlich_soziale_union": "Christlich Soziale Union", "votes_die_linke": "DIE LINKE", "votes_deutsche_konservative_partei": "Deutsche Konservative Partei", "votes_die_grauen": "Die Grauen", "votes_die_heimat": "Die Heimat", "votes_die_partei": "Die PARTEI", "votes_freie_w_hler": "FREIE W\u00c4HLER", "votes_freie_demokratische_partei": "Freie Demokratische Partei", "votes_gr_ne_b_90": "GR\u00dcNE/B 90", "votes_klimaliste_baden_w_rttemberg": "Klimaliste Baden-W\u00fcrttemberg", "votes_marxistisch_leninistische_partei_deu": "Marxistisch-Leninistische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_partei_mensch_umwelt_tierschutz": "PARTEI MENSCH UMWELT TIERSCHUTZ", "votes_partei_der_humanisten": "Partei der Humanisten", "votes_partei_f_r_gesundheitsforschung": "Partei f\u00fcr Gesundheitsforschung", "votes_piratenpartei_deutschland": "Piratenpartei Deutschland", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_s_dschleswigscher_w_hlerverband": "S\u00fcdschleswigscher W\u00e4hlerverband", "votes_team_todenh_fer_die_gerechtigkeitspa": "Team Todenh\u00f6fer \u2013 Die Gerechtigkeitspartei", "votes_unabh_ngige": "UNABH\u00c4NGIGE", "votes_v_partei_partei_f_r_ver_nderung_vege": "V-Partei\u00b3 - Partei f\u00fcr Ver\u00e4nderung, Vegetarier und Veganer", "votes_volt_deutschland": "Volt Deutschland", "votes_wir_b_rger": "Wir B\u00fcrger", "votes_kologisch_demokratische_partei": "\u00d6kologisch-Demokratische Partei", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 315, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:15:48.264456", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.863, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.814, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.016, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 315}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "49bd93d486f74a26ac557788d2f19a04", "name": "Germany 2017 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 315)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 2017, CONSTITUENCY level (315 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_ab_jetzt_demokratie_durch_volksabsti": "Ab jetzt\u2026Demokratie durch Volksabstimmung", "votes_allianz_deutscher_demokraten": "Allianz Deutscher Demokraten", "votes_allianz_f_r_menschenrechte_tier_und_": "Allianz f\u00fcr Menschenrechte, Tier- und Naturschutz", "votes_alternative_f_r_deutschland": "Alternative f\u00fcr Deutschland", "votes_bayernpartei": "Bayernpartei", "votes_b_ndnis_90_die_gr_nen": "B\u00dcNDNIS 90/DIE GR\u00dcNEN", "votes_b_ndnis_grundeinkommen": "B\u00fcndnis Grundeinkommen", "votes_b_rgerrechtsbewegung_solidarit_t": "B\u00fcrgerrechtsbewegung Solidarit\u00e4t", "votes_christlich_demokratische_union_deuts": "Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands", "votes_christlich_soziale_union_in_bayern_e": "Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V.", "votes_demokratie_in_bewegung": "DEMOKRATIE IN BEWEGUNG", "votes_die_linke": "DIE LINKE", "votes_deutsche_kommunistische_partei": "Deutsche Kommunistische Partei", "votes_deutsche_mitte": "Deutsche Mitte", "votes_die_grauen_f_r_alle_generationen": "Die Grauen \u2013 F\u00fcr alle Generationen", "votes_freie_w_hler": "FREIE W\u00c4HLER", "votes_freie_demokratische_partei": "Freie Demokratische Partei", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_menschliche_welt": "MENSCHLICHE WELT", "votes_magdeburger_gartenpartei": "Magdeburger Gartenpartei", "votes_marxistisch_leninistische_partei_deu": "Marxistisch-Leninistische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_nationaldemokratische_partei_deutsch": "Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_partei_mensch_umwelt_tierschutz": "PARTEI MENSCH UMWELT TIERSCHUTZ", "votes_partei_der_humanisten": "Partei der Humanisten", "votes_partei_f_r_arbeit_rechtsstaat_tiersc": "Partei f\u00fcr Arbeit, Rechtsstaat, Tierschutz, Elitenf\u00f6rderung und basisdemokratische Initiative", "votes_partei_f_r_gesundheitsforschung": "Partei f\u00fcr Gesundheitsforschung", "votes_piratenpartei_deutschland": "Piratenpartei Deutschland", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_v_partei_partei_f_r_ver_nderung_vege": "V-Partei\u00b3 - Partei f\u00fcr Ver\u00e4nderung, Vegetarier und Veganer", "votes_kologisch_demokratische_partei": "\u00d6kologisch-Demokratische Partei", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 315, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:15:42.913477", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.881, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.95, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.889, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.842, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.779, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.012, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.012, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 315}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ac091f0ffd4e4206849289fec3e0a405", "name": "Germany 2013 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 315)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 2013, CONSTITUENCY level (315 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_afd": "AfD", "votes_bgd": "BGD", "votes_big": "BIG", "votes_die_linke": "DIE LINKE", "votes_dkp": "DKP", "votes_die_partei": "Die PARTEI", "votes_partei_der_vernunft": "PARTEI DER VERNUNFT", "votes_ab_jetzt_demokratie_durch_volksabsti": "ab jetzt...demokratie durch volksabstimmung", "votes_bayernpartei": "bayernpartei", "votes_b_ndnis_21_rentnerinnen_und_rentner_": "b\u00fcndnis 21/rentnerinnen- und rentner-partei", "votes_b_rgerrechtsbewegung_solidarit_t": "b\u00fcrgerrechtsbewegung solidarit\u00e4t", "votes_christlich_demokratische_union": "christlich demokratische union", "votes_christlich_soziale_union": "christlich soziale union", "votes_die_gr_nen": "die gr\u00fcnen", "votes_die_republikaner": "die republikaner", "votes_die_violetten_f_r_spirituelle_politi": "die violetten - f\u00fcr spirituelle politik", "votes_familienpartei_deutschlands": "familienpartei deutschlands", "votes_freie_demokratische_partei": "freie demokratische partei", "votes_freie_w_hler_deutschland": "freie w\u00e4hler deutschland", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_marxistisch_leninistische_partei_deu": "marxistisch-leninistische partei deutschlands", "votes_mensch_umwelt_tierschutz": "mensch umwelt tierschutz", "votes_nationaldemokratische_partei_deutsch": "nationaldemokratische partei deutschlands", "votes_others": "others", "votes_partei_bibeltreuer_christen": "partei bibeltreuer christen", "votes_piratenpartei_deutschland": "piratenpartei deutschland", "votes_pro_deutschland": "pro Deutschland", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "sozialdemokratische partei deutschlands", "votes_dp_familie": "\u00d6DP / Familie", "votes_kologisch_demokratische_partei": "\u00f6kologisch-demokratische partei", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 315, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 9}, "n_stations_flagged": 9, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:15:38.860728", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.885, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.947, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.892, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.853, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.947, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.938, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.622, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.407, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 315}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "573d2902c1c5442eb659635a1b85d3b6", "name": "Georgia 2012 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 74)", "metadata": {"country": "Georgia", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Georgia lower-house election 2012, CONSTITUENCY level (74 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_christian_democratic_union": "Christian Democratic Union", "votes_free_georgia_party": "Free Georgia Party", "votes_freedom_path_of_zviad_gamsakhurdia": "Freedom - Path of Zviad Gamsakhurdia", "votes_future_georgia": "Future Georgia", "votes_georgian_dream": "Georgian Dream", "votes_georgian_group": "Georgian Group", "votes_georgian_sportsmen_s_community": "Georgian Sportsmen\u2019s Community", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_justice_for_georgia": "Justice for Georgia", "votes_labor_council_of_georgia": "Labor Council of Georgia", "votes_labour_party_of_georgia": "Labour Party of Georgia", "votes_merab_kostava_society": "Merab Kostava Society", "votes_national_democratic_party": "National Democratic Party", "votes_new_rights_party_of_georgia": "New Rights Party of Georgia", "votes_people_s_party": "People's Party", "votes_public_movement": "Public Movement", "votes_united_national_movement": "United National Movement"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 74, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:15:35.668322", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.974, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.609, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.519, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.361, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.974, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.495, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.465, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.396, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.519, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.519, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.361, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.361, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.431, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.748, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.748, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.568, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.568, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.096, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.096, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Georgian Dream", "winner_candidate": "Giorgi MARGVELASHVILI", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "United National Movement", "margin": 40.38, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "GEO", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 74}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1daa6835360e442b826d66101bb182a1", "name": "Gabon 2018 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 143)", "metadata": {"country": "Gabon", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Gabon lower-house election 2018, CONSTITUENCY level (143 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_d_mocratique_et_r_publicain": "Alliance D\u00e9mocratique Et R\u00e9publicaine", "votes_alliance_pour_la_renaissance_nationa": "Alliance Pour La Renaissance Nationale", "votes_alliance_pour_le_changement_et_le_re": "Alliance Pour Le Changement Et Le Renouveau", "votes_bloc_d_mocratique_camerounais": "Bloc D\u00e9mocratique Camerounais", "votes_centre_des_lib_raux_r_formateurs": "Centre Des Lib\u00e9raux-R\u00e9formateurs", "votes_d_mocratie_nouvelle": "D\u00e9mocratie Nouvelle", "votes_front_d_galit_r_publicaine": "Front D\u2019\u00c9galit\u00e9 R\u00e9publicaine", "votes_front_populaire_gabonais": "Front Populaire Gabonais", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_l_union_socaliste_progressiste": "L'Union Socaliste Progressiste", "votes_les_d_mocrates": "Les D\u00e9mocrates", "votes_parti_d_mocratique_gabonais": "Parti D\u00e9mocratique Gabonais", "votes_parti_gabonais_du_centre_ind_pendant": "Parti Gabonais Du Centre Ind\u00e9pendant", "votes_parti_pour_le_d_veloppement_et_la_so": "Parti Pour Le D\u00e9veloppement Et La Solidarit\u00e9", "votes_parti_social_d_mocrate": "Parti Social-D\u00e9mocrate", "votes_rassemblement_h_ritage_et_modernit": "Rassemblement H\u00e9ritage Et Modernit\u00e9", "votes_rassemblement_h_ritage_et_modernit_u": "Rassemblement H\u00e9ritage Et Modernit\u00e9/Union Nationale", "votes_rassemblement_pour_le_gabon": "Rassemblement Pour Le Gabon", "votes_rassemblement_pour_l_alternance_paci": "Rassemblement\u00a0Pour L\u2019Alternance\u00a0Pacifique Et L\u2019Ind\u00e9pendance D\u00e9mocratique", "votes_restauration_des_valeurs_r_publicain": "Restauration Des Valeurs R\u00e9publicaines", "votes_restauration_des_valeurs_r_2": "Restauration Des Valeurs R\u00e9publicaines/Parti D\u00e9mocratique Gabonais", "votes_sociaux_d_mocrates_du_gabon": "Sociaux-D\u00e9mocrates Du Gabon", "votes_u_s": "U.S.", "votes_union_du_peuple_gabonais_nergie_du_p": "Union Du Peuple Gabonais/\u00c9nergie Du Peuple Ind\u00e9pendant", "votes_union_nationale": "Union Nationale", "votes_union_pour_la_d_mocratie_et_l_int_gr": "Union Pour La D\u00e9mocratie Et L\u2019Int\u00e9gration Sociale", "votes_union_pour_la_d_mocratie_e_2": "Union Pour La D\u00e9mocratie Et L\u2019Int\u00e9gration Sociale/Parti D\u00e9mocratique Gabonais", "votes_union_pour_la_nouvelle_r_publique": "Union Pour La Nouvelle R\u00e9publique", "votes_union_pour_le_progr_s_national": "Union Pour Le Progr\u00e8s National", "votes_union_socialiste_gabonaise": "Union Socialiste Gabonaise", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 143, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:15:32.476148", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.812, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.252, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.386, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.212, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.812, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.453, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.252, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.791, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.448, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.016, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.254, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.471, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.118, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.862, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.466, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.64, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.386, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.386, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.212, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.212, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.293, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.293, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.204, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 143}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f6067ec9501145ffa07d27b683e9cdf8", "name": "France 2024 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 577)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "France lower-house election 2024, CONSTITUENCY level (577 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_blancs": "Blancs", "votes_divers": "Divers", "votes_divers_centre": "Divers Centre", "votes_divers_droite": "Divers Droite", "votes_divers_gauche": "Divers Gauche", "votes_divers_cologistes": "Divers \u00c9cologistes", "votes_droite_souverainiste": "Droite Souverainiste", "votes_ensemble": "Ensemble", "votes_extr_me_droite": "Extr\u00eame Droite", "votes_extr_me_gauche": "Extr\u00eame Gauche", "votes_horizons": "Horizons", "votes_la_france_insoumise": "La France Insoumise", "votes_les_r_publicains": "Les R\u00e9publicains", "votes_les_verts_conf_d_ration_cologiste_pa": "Les Verts, Conf\u00e9d\u00e9ration \u00c9cologiste -- Parti \u00c9cologiste", "votes_parti_communiste_fran_ais": "Parti Communiste Fran\u00e7ais", "votes_parti_socialiste": "Parti Socialiste", "votes_radical_de_gauche": "Radical de Gauche", "votes_rassemblement_national": "Rassemblement National", "votes_reconqu_te": "Reconqu\u00eate", "votes_r_gionalistes": "R\u00e9gionalistes", "votes_union_de_l_extr_me_droit": "Union de l'Extr\u00eame Droit", "votes_union_de_la_gauche": "Union de la Gauche", "votes_union_des_d_mocrates_et_ind_pendants": "Union des D\u00e9mocrates et Ind\u00e9pendants"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 577, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 184}, "n_stations_flagged": 184, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:15:27.546717", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.83, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.903, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.864, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.8, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.759, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.5, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.375, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.049, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.049, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 577}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c7cb2ff57df3488d982deae6457c67f2", "name": "France 2012 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 577)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "France lower-house election 2012, CONSTITUENCY level (577 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_centrist_alliance": "Centrist Alliance", "votes_left_front": "Left Front", "votes_new_center": "New Center", "votes_the_center_for_france": "The Center for France", "votes_autres_cologistes": "autres \u00e9cologistes", "votes_divers": "divers", "votes_divers_droite": "divers droite", "votes_divers_gauche": "divers gauche", "votes_extr_me_droite": "extr\u00eame droite", "votes_extr_me_gauche": "extr\u00eame gauche", "votes_front_national": "front national", "votes_les_verts": "les verts", "votes_parti_radical_de_gauche": "parti radical de gauche", "votes_parti_socialiste": "parti socialiste", "votes_r_gionalistes": "r\u00e9gionalistes", "votes_union_pour_un_mouvement_populaire": "union pour un mouvement populaire"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 577, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 28}, "n_stations_flagged": 28, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:15:12.784702", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.895, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.89, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.82, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.961, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.694, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.452, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.059, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.059, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "SP", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "UMP", "margin": 3.27, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "FRA", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 577}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0d827b97f2b548c2a95efe4d9a1fbe13", "name": "France 2007 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 558)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "France lower-house election 2007, CONSTITUENCY level (558 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_french_communist_party": "French Communist Party", "votes_presidential_majority": "Presidential Majority", "votes_regionalists_and_separatists": "Regionalists and separatists", "votes_autres_cologistes": "autres \u00e9cologistes", "votes_chasse_p_che_nature_et_traditions": "chasse, p\u00eache, nature, et traditions", "votes_divers": "divers", "votes_divers_droite": "divers droite", "votes_divers_gauche": "divers gauche", "votes_divers_udf": "divers udf", "votes_extr_me_droite": "extr\u00eame droite", "votes_extr_me_gauche": "extr\u00eame gauche", "votes_front_national": "front national", "votes_les_verts": "les verts", "votes_mouvement_pour_la_france": "mouvement pour la france", "votes_parti_radical_de_gauche": "parti radical de gauche", "votes_parti_socialiste": "parti socialiste", "votes_r_gionalistes": "r\u00e9gionalistes", "votes_union_pour_un_mouvement_populaire": "union pour un mouvement populaire"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 558, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:15:07.795114", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.893, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.877, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.807, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.45, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.455, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.364, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.877, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.807, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.059, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.059, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "UMP", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "PS", "margin": 6.13, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "FRA", "year": 2007, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 558}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "98aae0045c2b4d18bc216afeb5f1790d", "name": "France 1936 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 618)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 1936, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "France lower-house election 1936, CONSTITUENCY level (618 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_agraire": "Agraire", "votes_agraire_ind_pendant": "Agraire ind\u00e9pendant", "votes_communiste": "Communiste", "votes_conservateur": "Conservateur", "votes_divers": "Divers.", "votes_d_mocrate_populaire": "D\u00e9mocrate populaire", "votes_gauche_ind_pendant": "Gauche Ind\u00e9pendant", "votes_ind_pendant": "Ind\u00e9pendant", "votes_ind_pendant_de_g": "Ind\u00e9pendant de g.", "votes_ind_pendent_d_action_populaire": "Ind\u00e9pendent d'action populaire", "votes_jeune_r_publique": "Jeune R\u00e9publique", "votes_parti_social_fran_ais": "Parti Social Fran\u00e7ais", "votes_radical_ind_pendant": "Radical ind\u00e9pendant", "votes_radical_ind_pendant_alliance_d_mocra": "Radical ind\u00e9pendant (Alliance d\u00e9mocratique)", "votes_r_publicain_nationale": "R\u00e9publicain Nationale", "votes_r_publicain_de_gauche": "R\u00e9publicain de gauche", "votes_r_publicain_de_gauche_alliance_d_moc": "R\u00e9publicain de gauche (Alliance d\u00e9mocratique)", "votes_r_publicain_ind_pendant": "R\u00e9publicain ind\u00e9pendant", "votes_r_publicain_radical_et_radical_socia": "R\u00e9publicain radical et radical-socialiste", "votes_r_publicain_radical_et_rad_2": "R\u00e9publicain radical et radical-socialiste.", "votes_r_publicain_socialiste": "R\u00e9publicain socialiste", "votes_section_fran_aise_de_l_international": "Section fran\u00e7aise de l'Internationale ouvri\u00e8re", "votes_socialist_fr": "Socialist fr.", "votes_socialiste_section_fran_aise_de_l_in": "Socialiste (Section fran\u00e7aise de l'Internationale ouvri\u00e8re)", "votes_union_r_publicaine_d_mocratique": "Union r\u00e9publicaine d\u00e9mocratique", "votes_union_r_publicaine_d_mocratique_f_d_": "Union r\u00e9publicaine d\u00e9mocratique (F\u00e9d\u00e9ration r\u00e9publicaine de France)", "votes_union_r_publicaine_d_mocratique_agra": "Union r\u00e9publicaine d\u00e9mocratique Agraire ind\u00e9pendant", "votes_union_socialiste_r_publicaine": "Union socialiste r\u00e9publicaine", "votes_unit_ouvri_re": "Unit\u00e9 ouvri\u00e8re", "votes_unit_prol_tarienne": "Unit\u00e9 prol\u00e9tarienne", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 618, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 614}, "n_stations_flagged": 614, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:15:03.355169", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.664, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.858, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.552, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.456, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.664, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1936, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1936, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.701, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 1936, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 1936, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.246, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 1936, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.426, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 1936, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.157, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.039, "year": 1936, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.552, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 1936, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 1936, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 1936, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 1936, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 1936, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.13, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.13, "year": 1936, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 1936, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 618}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9df984982fe2448ea9b1b65741159335", "name": "France 1928 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 612)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 1928, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "France lower-house election 1928, CONSTITUENCY level (612 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anticommuniste": "Anticommuniste", "votes_autonomiste": "Autonomiste", "votes_bloc_ouvrier_et_paysan": "Bloc ouvrier et paysan", "votes_conservateur": "Conservateur", "votes_divers": "Divers", "votes_ind_pendant": "Ind\u00e9pendant", "votes_radical_ind_pendant": "Radical ind\u00e9pendant", "votes_radical_socialiste": "Radical socialiste", "votes_r_publicain": "R\u00e9publicain", "votes_r_publicain_de_gauche": "R\u00e9publicain de gauche", "votes_r_publicain_de_gauche_alliance_d_moc": "R\u00e9publicain de gauche (Alliance d\u00e9mocratique et D\u00e9mocrate populaire)", "votes_r_publicain_de_gauche_alli_2": "R\u00e9publicain de gauche (Alliance d\u00e9mocratique et F\u00e9d\u00e9ration r\u00e9publicaine de France)", "votes_r_publicain_de_gauche_alli_3": "R\u00e9publicain de gauche (Alliance d\u00e9mocratique)", "votes_r_publican_ind_pendant": "R\u00e9publican ind\u00e9pendant", "votes_r_publican_radical": "R\u00e9publican radical", "votes_r_publican_radical_alliance_d_mocrat": "R\u00e9publican radical (Alliance d\u00e9mocratique)", "votes_r_publican_radical_investi_par_the_c": "R\u00e9publican radical investi par the comit\u00e9 radical et radical socialiste", "votes_r_publican_socialiste": "R\u00e9publican socialiste", "votes_r_publican_socialiste_alliance_d_moc": "R\u00e9publican socialiste (Alliance d\u00e9mocratique)", "votes_section_fran_aise_de_l_international": "Section fran\u00e7aise de l'Internationale ouvri\u00e8re", "votes_soc": "Soc.", "votes_soc_nat": "Soc. nat.", "votes_socialiste_communiste": "Socialiste communiste", "votes_socialiste_ind_pendant": "Socialiste ind\u00e9pendant", "votes_union_r_publicaine_et_d_mocratique": "Union r\u00e9publicaine et d\u00e9mocratique", "votes_union_r_publicaine_et_d_mocratique_a": "Union r\u00e9publicaine et d\u00e9mocratique (Alliance d\u00e9mocratique et F\u00e9d\u00e9ration r\u00e9publicaine de France)", "votes_union_r_publicaine_et_d_mo_2": "Union r\u00e9publicaine et d\u00e9mocratique (Alliance d\u00e9mocratique)", "votes_union_r_publicaine_et_d_mocratique_d": "Union r\u00e9publicaine et d\u00e9mocratique (D\u00e9mocrate populaire)", "votes_union_r_publicaine_et_d_mocratique_f": "Union r\u00e9publicaine et d\u00e9mocratique (F\u00e9d\u00e9ration r\u00e9publicaine de France et D\u00e9mocrate populaire)", "votes_union_r_publicaine_et_d_mo_3": "Union r\u00e9publicaine et d\u00e9mocratique (F\u00e9d\u00e9ration r\u00e9publicaine de France)", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 612, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 612}, "n_stations_flagged": 612, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:14:58.446576", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.655, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.868, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.561, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.462, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.655, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 1928, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1928, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.707, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 1928, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.166, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 1928, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.246, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 1928, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.426, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 1928, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.154, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.038, "year": 1928, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.561, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 1928, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.462, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.462, "year": 1928, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.379, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.379, "year": 1928, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 1928, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 1928, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.13, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.13, "year": 1928, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.888, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 1928, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 612}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3c8e65e480a14c06b01906e707947263", "name": "France 1914 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 602)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 1914, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "France lower-house election 1914, CONSTITUENCY level (602 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_990": "-990", "votes_conservateur": "Conservateur", "votes_droite": "Droite", "votes_d_mocratique": "D\u00e9mocratique", "votes_f_s": "F.S", "votes_f_d_ration_r_publicaine": "F\u00e9d\u00e9ration R\u00e9publicaine", "votes_f_d_ration_des_gauches": "F\u00e9d\u00e9ration des Gauches", "votes_gauche_d_mocrate": "Gauche D\u00e9mocrate", "votes_ind_pendant": "Ind\u00e9pendant", "votes_les_r_publicains": "Les R\u00e9publicains", "votes_parti_ouvrier": "Parti Ouvrier", "votes_parti_r_publicain_d_mocratique": "Parti R\u00e9publicain d\u00e9mocratique", "votes_parti_socialiste_unifi": "Parti Socialiste Unifi\u00e9.", "votes_progressiste": "Progressiste", "votes_progressiste_f_d_ration_r_publicaine": "Progressiste, F\u00e9d\u00e9ration R\u00e9publicaine", "votes_r_f": "R.F", "votes_radical": "Radical", "votes_radical_ind_pendant_ou_gauche_radica": "Radical Ind\u00e9pendant ou Gauche Radical.", "votes_radical_socialiste": "Radical Socialiste", "votes_radical_unifi": "Radical Unifi\u00e9.", "votes_radical_parti_r_publicain_d_mocratiq": "Radical. Parti R\u00e9publicain d\u00e9mocratique.", "votes_r_publicain": "R\u00e9publicain", "votes_r_publicain_d_mocratique": "R\u00e9publicain D\u00e9mocratique", "votes_r_publicain_socialiste": "R\u00e9publicain Socialiste", "votes_r_publicain_de_gauche": "R\u00e9publicain de gauche", "votes_r_publicain_d_mocratique_2": "R\u00e9publicain d\u00e9mocratique", "votes_r_publicain_d_mocratique_ind_pendant": "R\u00e9publicain d\u00e9mocratique (ind\u00e9pendant)", "votes_r_publicain_lib_ral": "R\u00e9publicain lib\u00e9ral.", "votes_socialistes_ind_pendant": "Socialistes ind\u00e9pendant", "votes_lib_ral": "lib\u00e9ral", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 602, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 63}, "n_stations_flagged": 63, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:14:52.893414", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.394, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.898, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.512, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.42, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.394, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 1914, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.898, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1914, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.722, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 1914, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.217, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 1914, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.246, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 1914, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.426, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 1914, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.093, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 1914, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 1914, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.42, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.42, "year": 1914, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.349, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.349, "year": 1914, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 1914, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 1914, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.13, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.13, "year": 1914, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 1914, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 602}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "50ece51d129d44f9be0bb82b1d776a61", "name": "France 1910 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 596)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 1910, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "France lower-house election 1910, CONSTITUENCY level (596 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_divers": "Divers", "votes_divers_droite": "Divers droite", "votes_divers_gauche": "Divers gauche", "votes_divers_progressiste": "Divers progressiste", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_l_alliance_r_publicaine_d_mocratique": "L'Alliance r\u00e9publicaine d\u00e9mocratique", "votes_la_f_d_ration_r_publicaine": "La F\u00e9d\u00e9ration r\u00e9publicaine", "votes_la_f_d_ration_r_publicaine_et_de_l_a": "La F\u00e9d\u00e9ration r\u00e9publicaine et de l'Alliance r\u00e9publicaine d\u00e9mocratique", "votes_parti_socialiste": "Parti Socialiste", "votes_parti_r_publicain_radical_et_radical": "Parti r\u00e9publicain radical et radical socialiste", "votes_parti_r_publicain_radical__2": "Parti r\u00e9publicain radical et radical socialiste et de l'Alliance r\u00e9publicaine d\u00e9mocratique", "votes_parti_socialiste_2": "Parti socialiste", "votes_radical_ind_pendant": "Radical ind\u00e9pendant", "votes_socialiste_ind_pendant": "Socialiste ind\u00e9pendant"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 596, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 585, "registered_not_positive": 4, "cast_gt_registered": 55}, "n_stations_flagged": 589, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:14:47.765997", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.392, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.901, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.564, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.466, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.392, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1910, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.901, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.729, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.208, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 1910, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.246, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 1910, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.426, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.105, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.564, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.564, "year": 1910, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.466, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.466, "year": 1910, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.382, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.382, "year": 1910, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 1910, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.13, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.13, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 596}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c5d5df2ce3e74c95b7b19967a90fbc7f", "name": "Ethiopia 2010 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 547)", "metadata": {"country": "Ethiopia", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ethiopia lower-house election 2010, CONSTITUENCY level (547 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_afar_national_democratic_party": "Afar National Democratic Party", "votes_all_ethiopian_unity_party": "All Ethiopian Unity Party", "votes_argoba_people_democratic_organizatio": "Argoba People Democratic Organization", "votes_bahir_work_mesmes_people_s_democrati": "Bahir Work Mesmes People's Democratic Organization", "votes_bench_people_democratic_organization": "Bench People Democratic Organization", "votes_benishangul_gumuz_peoples_democratic": "Benishangul-Gumuz Peoples' Democratic Party", "votes_coalition_for_unity_and_democracy_pa": "Coalition for Unity and Democracy Party", "votes_ethiopian_democratic_party": "Ethiopian Democratic Party", "votes_ethiopian_federal_democratic_unity_f": "Ethiopian Federal Democratic Unity Forum", "votes_ethiopian_justice_and_democratic_for": "Ethiopian Justice and Democratic Forces Front", "votes_ethiopian_people_s_revolutionary_dem": "Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Democratic Front", "votes_ethiopian_people_s_revolut_2": "Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Democratic Front/Argoba Nationality Democratic Movement", "votes_ethiopian_people_s_revolut_3": "Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Democratic Front/Oromo Peoples' Democratic Organization", "votes_ethiopian_people_s_revolut_4": "Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Democratic Front/Southern Ethiopia People's Democratic Movement", "votes_ethiopian_people_s_revolut_5": "Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Democratic Front/Tigray People Liberation Front", "votes_ethiopian_raie_party": "Ethiopian Raie Party", "votes_gambela_peoples_unity_democratic_mov": "Gambela Peoples' Unity Democratic Movement", "votes_geda_system_advancement_party": "Geda System Advancement Party", "votes_gedeo_people_democratic_organization": "Gedeo People Democratic Organization", "votes_harari_national_league": "Harari National League", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_mao_komo_special_wereda_peoples_demo": "Mao-Komo Special Wereda Peoples' Democratic Unity Movement", "votes_oromo_liberation_unity_party": "Oromo Liberation Unity Party", "votes_oromo_national_congress": "Oromo National Congress", "votes_oromo_peoples_democratic_organizatio": "Oromo Peoples' Democratic Organization", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_sidama_hadicho_people_democratic_org": "Sidama Hadicho People Democratic Organization", "votes_sidama_liberation_movement": "Sidama Liberation Movement", "votes_somali_people_s_democratic_party": "Somali People's Democratic Party", "votes_wolenigna_language_speaker_people_s_": "Wolenigna Language Speaker People's Democratic Movement", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 547, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 547, "cast_gt_registered": 547}, "n_stations_flagged": 547, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:14:42.882097", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.935, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 0.505, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.229, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.109, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.234, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 0.505, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.126, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.466, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.364, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.091, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.718, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.179, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.076, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.269, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.166, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.229, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.229, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.109, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.109, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.155, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.155, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.382, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.382, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.189, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.189, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.283, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.283, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 547}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2bf1501f925e4faca5ac365ae8fbbe30", "name": "C\u00f4te d'Ivoire 2021 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 205)", "metadata": {"country": "Cote d'Ivoire", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "C\u00f4te d'Ivoire lower-house election 2021, CONSTITUENCY level (205 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_1000_volontaires": "1000 VOLONTAIRES", "votes_blanks": "Blanks", "votes_ensemble_pour_b_tir": "Ensemble pour b\u00e2tir", "votes_ensemble_pour_la_d_mocratie_et_la_so": "Ensemble pour la d\u00e9mocratie et la souverainet\u00e9", "votes_forces_aux_peuples": "FORCES AUX PEUPLES", "votes_front_national_d_mocrate_et_r_formis": "Front National D\u00e9mocrate et R\u00e9formiste", "votes_front_populaire_ivoirien": "Front populaire ivoirien", "votes_independant": "INDEPENDANT", "votes_independant_2": "Independant", "votes_mouvement_pour_une_alternance_democr": "MOUVEMENT POUR UNE ALTERNANCE DEMOCRATIQUE", "votes_mouvement_national_citoyen": "Mouvement National Citoyen", "votes_nouvelle_union_pour_la_c_te_d_ivoire": "NOUVELLE UNION POUR LA C\u00d4TE D'IVOIRE", "votes_parti_ecologique_de_cote_d_ivoire": "PARTI ECOLOGIQUE DE COTE D'IVOIRE", "votes_pour_la_republique_et_la_democratie": "POUR LA REPUBLIQUE ET LA DEMOCRATIE", "votes_parti_ecologique_ivoirien": "Parti Ecologique Ivoirien", "votes_parti_ivoirien_des_agriculteurs": "Parti Ivoirien des Agriculteurs", "votes_parti_populaire_social_d_mocrate": "Parti Populaire Social-D\u00e9mocrate", "votes_parti_d_mocratique_de_c_te_d_ivoire_": "Parti d\u00e9mocratique de C\u00f4te d'Ivoire-Rassemblement d\u00e9mocratique africain", "votes_parti_d_mocratique_de_c_te_2": "Parti d\u00e9mocratique de C\u00f4te d'Ivoire-Rassemblement d\u00e9mocratique africain/Ensemble pour la d\u00e9mocratie et la souverainet\u00e9", "votes_parti_pour_le_progr_s_et_le_socialis": "Parti pour le Progr\u00e8s et le Socialisme", "votes_rassemblement_des_democrates_de_cote": "RASSEMBLEMENT DES DEMOCRATES DE COTE D IVOIRE", "votes_rassemblement_pour_la_paix_et_la_con": "RASSEMBLEMENT POUR LA PAIX ET LA CONCORDE", "votes_rassemblement_pour_la_paix_2": "RASSEMBLEMENT POUR LA PAIX ET LA CONCORDE/Groupement des Partenaires Politiques pour la Paix", "votes_rassemblement_des_houphou_tistes_pou": "Rassemblement des Houphou\u00e9tistes pour la D\u00e9mocratie et la Paix", "votes_servir_la_c_te_d_ivoire": "SERVIR LA C\u00d4TE D'IVOIRE", "votes_union_democratique_et_citoyenne": "UNION DEMOCRATIQUE ET CITOYENNE", "votes_union_republicaine_pour_democratie": "UNION REPUBLICAINE POUR DEMOCRATIE", "votes_union_r_publicaine_pour_la_d_mocrati": "Union R\u00e9publicaine pour la D\u00e9mocratie", "votes_union_pour_la_d_mocratie_et_la_paix_": "Union pour la D\u00e9mocratie et la Paix en C\u00f4te d'Ivoire", "votes_independant_3": "iNDEPENDANT", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 205, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:14:39.385523", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 205}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "75c31f7728434f7d98b5d7baeba78eb2", "name": "C\u00f4te d'Ivoire 2016 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 205)", "metadata": {"country": "Cote d'Ivoire", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "C\u00f4te d'Ivoire lower-house election 2016, CONSTITUENCY level (205 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_des_forces_d_mocratique": "Alliance des Forces D\u00e9mocratique", "votes_cap_unir_pour_la_d_mocratie_et_le_d_": "Cap Unir pour la D\u00e9mocratie et le D\u00e9veloppement", "votes_collectif_des_d_mocrates_ivoiriens": "Collectif des D\u00e9mocrates Ivoiriens", "votes_congr_s_du_peuple_pour_le_d_veloppem": "Congr\u00e8s du Peuple pour le D\u00e9veloppement et la Libert\u00e9", "votes_congr_s_pour_la_renaissance_ivoirien": "Congr\u00e8s pour la Renaissance Ivoirienne", "votes_c_te_d_ivoire_nouvelle_rassemblement": "C\u00f4te d'Ivoire Nouvelle : Rassemblement, Paix et D\u00e9veloppement", "votes_d_mocratie_pour_la_libert_et_la_coh_": "D\u00e9mocratie pour la Libert\u00e9 et la Coh\u00e9sion", "votes_front_national_d_mocrate_et_r_formis": "Front National D\u00e9mocrate et R\u00e9formiste", "votes_front_populaire_ivoirien": "Front Populaire Ivoirien", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_libert_et_d_mocratie_pour_la_r_publi": "Libert\u00e9 et D\u00e9mocratie pour la R\u00e9publique", "votes_l_union_socialiste_du_peuple": "L\u2019Union Socialiste du Peuple", "votes_mouvement_d_mocratique_et_social": "Mouvement D\u00e9mocratique et Social", "votes_mouvement_national_citoyen": "Mouvement National Citoyen", "votes_parti_communite_revolutionnaire_de_c": "Parti Communite Revolutionnaire de C\u00f4te d'Ivoire", "votes_parti_ivoirien_des_d_fis_a_relever": "Parti Ivoirien des D\u00e9fis A Relever", "votes_parti_ivoirien_des_verts": "Parti Ivoirien des Verts", "votes_parti_populaire_social_d_mocrate": "Parti Populaire Social-D\u00e9mocrate", "votes_parti_de_l_unit_et_du_prog_s_de_c_te": "Parti de l'Unit\u00e9 et du Prog\u00e8s de C\u00f4te d'Ivoire", "votes_rassemblement_d_mocratique_panafrica": "Rassemblement D\u00e9mocratique Panafricain", "votes_rassemblement_pour_la_paix_le_progr_": "Rassemblement pour la Paix, le Progr\u00e8s et le Partage", "votes_renouveau_pour_la_paix_et_la_concord": "Renouveau pour la Paix et la Concorde", "votes_union_d_mocratique_et_citoyenne": "Union D\u00e9mocratique et Citoyenne", "votes_union_r_publicaine_pour_la_d_mocrati": "Union R\u00e9publicaine pour la D\u00e9mocratie", "votes_union_des_democrates_pour_le_progres": "Union des Democrates Pour le Progres", "votes_union_pour_la_c_te_d_ivoire": "Union pour la C\u00f4te d'Ivoire", "votes_union_pour_la_d_mocratie_totale_en_c": "Union pour la D\u00e9mocratie Totale en Cote d'Ivoire", "votes_union_pour_la_d_mocratie_et_la_paix_": "Union pour la D\u00e9mocratie et la Paix en C\u00f4te d'Ivoire", "votes_union_pour_le_progr_s": "Union pour le Progr\u00e8s", "votes_union_pour_le_progr_s_national": "Union pour le Progr\u00e8s National", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 205, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:14:36.026365", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 205}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bc5848c620314d8e95fb701fc5f0dcd8", "name": "C\u00f4te d'Ivoire 2011 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 189)", "metadata": {"country": "Cote d'Ivoire", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "C\u00f4te d'Ivoire lower-house election 2011 (12.0), CONSTITUENCY level (189 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_cap_unir_pour_la_d_mocratie_et_le_d_": "Cap Unir pour la D\u00e9mocratie et le D\u00e9veloppement", "votes_conglom_rat_ivoirien_de_la_renaissan": "Conglom\u00e9rat ivoirien de la renaissance des moder\u00e9s", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_la_renaissance": "LA Renaissance", "votes_libert_et_d_mocratie_pour_la_r_publi": "Libert\u00e9 et D\u00e9mocratie pour la R\u00e9publique", "votes_l_union_pour_la_c_te_d_ivoire": "L\u2019Union Pour la C\u00f4te d\u2019Ivoire", "votes_mouvement_d_mocratique_et_social": "Mouvement D\u00e9mocratique et Social", "votes_mouvement_ecologique_ivoirien": "Mouvement Ecologique Ivoirien", "votes_mouvement_ivoirien_pour_le_renouveau": "Mouvement Ivoirien pour le Renouveau et l'Espoir", "votes_mouvement_national_citoyen": "Mouvement National Citoyen", "votes_mouvement_des_forces_d_avenir": "Mouvement des Forces d'Avenir", "votes_parti_communite_revolutionnaire_de_c": "Parti Communite Revolutionnaire de C\u00f4te d'Ivoire", "votes_parti_d_mocratique_de_c_te_d_ivoire_": "Parti D\u00e9mocratique de C\u00f4te d'Ivoire- Rassemblement D\u00e9mocratique Africain", "votes_parti_ivoirien_des_agriculteurs": "Parti Ivoirien des Agriculteurs", "votes_parti_national_d_mocratique_de_c_te_": "Parti National D\u00e9mocratique de C\u00f4te d'Ivoire", "votes_parti_national_des_jeunes_d_mocrates": "Parti National des Jeunes D\u00e9mocrates de C\u00f4te d'Ivoire", "votes_parti_republicain_de_cote_d_ivoire": "Parti Republicain de Cote d Ivoire", "votes_parti_des_democrates_republicains": "Parti des Democrates Republicains", "votes_parti_ivoirien_des_travailleurs": "Parti ivoirien des travailleurs", "votes_parti_pour_le_progr_s_et_le_socialis": "Parti pour le Progr\u00e8s et le Socialisme", "votes_rassemblement_des_houphou_tistes_pou": "Rassemblement des Houphou\u00e9tistes pour la D\u00e9mocratie et la Paix", "votes_rassemblement_des_r_publicains": "Rassemblement des R\u00e9publicains", "votes_udpci_mfa_pit": "UDPCI-MFA-PIT", "votes_udpci_rdr": "UDPCI-RDR", "votes_union_d_mocratique_et_citoyenne": "Union D\u00e9mocratique et Citoyenne", "votes_union_nationale_pour_la_democratie": "Union Nationale pour la Democratie", "votes_union_des_democrates_pour_le_progres": "Union des Democrates Pour le Progres", "votes_union_des_paysans_des_ouvriers_et_de": "Union des Paysans, des Ouvriers et des Salari\u00e9s de C\u00f4te d'Ivoire", "votes_union_pour_la_d_mocratie_et_la_paix_": "Union pour la D\u00e9mocratie et la Paix en C\u00f4te d'Ivoire", "votes_union_pour_le_progr_s_national": "Union pour le Progr\u00e8s National", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 189, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:14:30.443367", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 189}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e4410d91cfdd4aafab31b2a5265e6019", "name": "Canada 2021 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 337)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 2021, CONSTITUENCY level (337 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_animal_protection_party": "Animal Protection Party", "votes_bloc_qu_b_cois": "Bloc Qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois", "votes_cff_canada_s_fourth_front": "CFF - Canada's Fourth Front", "votes_centrist": "Centrist", "votes_christian_heritage_party": "Christian Heritage Party", "votes_communist": "Communist", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_free_party_canada": "Free Party Canada", "votes_green_party": "Green Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian", "votes_marijuana_party": "Marijuana Party", "votes_marxist_leninist": "Marxist-Leninist", "votes_maverick_party": "Maverick Party", "votes_ndp_new_democratic_party": "NDP-New Democratic Party", "votes_national_citizens_alliance": "National Citizens Alliance", "votes_nationalist": "Nationalist", "votes_no_affiliation": "No Affiliation", "votes_parti_patriote": "Parti Patriote", "votes_parti_rhinoc_ros_party": "Parti Rhinoc\u00e9ros Party", "votes_people_s_party_ppc": "People's Party - PPC", "votes_pour_l_ind_pendance_du_qu_bec": "Pour l'Ind\u00e9pendance du Qu\u00e9bec", "votes_vcp": "VCP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 337, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 186}, "n_stations_flagged": 186, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:14:26.472025", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.846, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.904, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.749, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 337}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9fe83f09558748d48d5a2a66c4417366", "name": "Canada 2019 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 338)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 2019, CONSTITUENCY level (338 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_animal_protection_party": "Animal Protection Party", "votes_bloc_qu_b_cois": "Bloc Qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois", "votes_cff_canada_s_fourth_front": "CFF - Canada's Fourth Front", "votes_christian_heritage_party": "Christian Heritage Party", "votes_communist": "Communist", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_green_party": "Green Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian", "votes_ml": "ML", "votes_ndp_new_democratic_party": "NDP-New Democratic Party", "votes_national_citizens_alliance": "National Citizens Alliance", "votes_nationalist": "Nationalist", "votes_no_affiliation": "No Affiliation", "votes_pc_party": "PC Party", "votes_parti_rhinoc_ros_party": "Parti Rhinoc\u00e9ros Party", "votes_parti_pour_l_ind_pendance_du_qu_bec": "Parti pour l'ind\u00e9pendance du Qu\u00e9bec", "votes_people_s_party": "People's Party", "votes_radical_marijuana": "Radical Marijuana", "votes_stop_climate_change": "Stop Climate Change", "votes_upc": "UPC", "votes_vcp": "VCP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 338, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 338, "cast_gt_registered": 338}, "n_stations_flagged": 338, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:14:22.756842", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.875, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.918, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.85, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.763, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.716, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 338}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3989c4c146fc49b584b340f676b40e78", "name": "Canada 2015 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 338)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 2015, CONSTITUENCY level (338 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_of_the_north": "alliance of the north", "votes_animal_alliance_environment_voters": "animal alliance/environment voters", "votes_bloc_qu_b_cois": "bloc qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois", "votes_canada_party": "canada party", "votes_canadian_action_party": "canadian action party", "votes_christian_heritage_party_of_canada": "christian heritage party of canada", "votes_communist_party_of_canada": "communist party of canada", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_democratic_advancement": "democratic advancement", "votes_green_party_of_canada": "green party of canada", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_libertarian_party_of_canada": "libertarian party of canada", "votes_marxist_leninist_party": "marxist-leninist party", "votes_new_democratic_party": "new democratic party", "votes_parti_rhinoc_ros": "parti rhinoc\u00e9ros", "votes_party_for_accountability_competency_": "party for accountability, competency and transparency", "votes_pirate_party": "pirate party", "votes_progressive_conservative": "progressive conservative", "votes_radical_marijuana": "radical marijuana", "votes_seniors_party": "seniors party", "votes_strength_in_democracy": "strength in democracy", "votes_the_bridge": "the bridge", "votes_united_party": "united party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 338, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:14:18.968020", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.763, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.944, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.807, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.735, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.944, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.421, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.718, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.779, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.807, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.735, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 338}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0e48f0fa850e4c7fbe199165142acdac", "name": "Belarus 2019 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 110)", "metadata": {"country": "Belarus", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Belarus lower-house election 2019, CONSTITUENCY level (110 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_against_all": "Against All", "votes_bpf_party": "BPF Party", "votes_belarusian_agrarian_party": "Belarusian Agrarian Party", "votes_belarusian_green_party": "Belarusian Green Party", "votes_belarusian_leftist_party_a_just_worl": "Belarusian Leftist Party \"A Just World\"", "votes_belarusian_patriotic_party": "Belarusian Patriotic Party", "votes_belarusian_popular_front": "Belarusian Popular Front", "votes_belarusian_social_democratic_hramada": "Belarusian Social Democratic Hramada", "votes_belarusian_social_sporting_party": "Belarusian Social Sporting Party", "votes_communist_party_of_belarus": "Communist Party of Belarus", "votes_liberal_democratic_party": "Liberal Democratic Party", "votes_non_partisan": "Non-Partisan", "votes_republican_labor_justice_party": "Republican Labor Justice Party", "votes_republican_party": "Republican Party", "votes_united_civil_party": "United Civil Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 110, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:14:16.689683", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.545, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.409, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.259, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.11, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.136, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.409, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.352, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.473, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.228, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.057, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.064, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.071, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.259, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.259, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.11, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.11, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.275, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.275, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.041, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.041, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.333, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.333, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.315, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.315, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 110}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "32e30e3fb5b64069b90591db863b9a99", "name": "Belarus 2016 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 110)", "metadata": {"country": "Belarus", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Belarus lower-house election 2016, CONSTITUENCY level (110 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_against_all_candidates": "Against all candidates", "votes_bpf_party": "BPF Party", "votes_belarusian_green_party": "Belarusian Green Party", "votes_belarusian_left_party_a_just_world": "Belarusian Left Party \"A Just World\"", "votes_belarusian_patriotic_party": "Belarusian Patriotic Party", "votes_belarusian_social_democratic_party_p": "Belarusian Social Democratic Party (Popular Assembly)", "votes_communist_party_of_belarus": "Communist Party of Belarus", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_liberal_democratic_party": "Liberal Democratic Party", "votes_republican_party_of_labour_and_justi": "Republican Party of Labour and Justice", "votes_united_civic_party": "United Civic Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 110, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 110, "registered_not_positive": 110}, "n_stations_flagged": 110, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:14:12.245086", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.546, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.373, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.256, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.107, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.546, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.137, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.343, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.757, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.198, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.064, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.288, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.072, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.256, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.256, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.107, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.107, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.281, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.62, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.62, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.04, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.04, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.33, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.306, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": null, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "BLR", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 110}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cadf3185fad948fcae732882e58562a5", "name": "Belarus 2012 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 110)", "metadata": {"country": "Belarus", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Belarus lower-house election 2012, CONSTITUENCY level (110 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_candidates_who_dropped_out": "Candidates who Dropped Out", "votes_none_of_the_above": "None of the above", "votes_non_partisan": "non-partisan", "votes_": "\u0447\u043b\u0435\u043d \u0411\u0435\u043b\u043e\u0440\u0443\u0441\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u0430\u0433\u0440\u0430\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0438", "votes__2": "\u0447\u043b\u0435\u043d \u0411\u0435\u043b\u043e\u0440\u0443\u0441\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0438 \u043b\u0435\u0432\u044b\u0445 \u00ab\u0421\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0435\u0434\u043b\u0438\u0432\u044b\u0439 \u043c\u0438\u0440\u00bb", "votes__3": "\u0447\u043b\u0435\u043d \u0411\u0435\u043b\u043e\u0440\u0443\u0441\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u0441\u043e\u0446\u0438\u0430\u043b-\u0434\u0435\u043c\u043e\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0438 (\u0413\u0440\u0430\u043c\u0430\u0434\u0430)", "votes__4": "\u0447\u043b\u0435\u043d \u0411\u0435\u043b\u043e\u0440\u0443\u0441\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u0441\u043e\u0446\u0438\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0441\u043f\u043e\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043d\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0438", "votes__5": "\u0447\u043b\u0435\u043d \u041a\u043e\u043c\u043c\u0443\u043d\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0438 \u0411\u0435\u043b\u0430\u0440\u0443\u0441\u0438", "votes__6": "\u0447\u043b\u0435\u043d \u041b\u0438\u0431\u0435\u0440\u0430\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0434\u0435\u043c\u043e\u043a\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0438", "votes__7": "\u0447\u043b\u0435\u043d \u041f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0438 \u0411\u041d\u0424", "votes__8": "\u0447\u043b\u0435\u043d \u0420\u0435\u0441\u043f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043d\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0439 \u043f\u0430\u0440\u0442\u0438\u0438 \u0442\u0440\u0443\u0434\u0430 \u0438 \u0441\u043f\u0440\u0430\u0432\u0435\u0434\u043b\u0438\u0432\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0438"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 110, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:14:09.958704", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.548, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.361, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.221, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.094, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.548, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.137, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.361, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.34, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.053, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.064, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.286, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.071, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.221, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.221, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.094, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.094, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.266, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.266, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.043, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.359, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.359, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.193, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 110}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "74144acf52504442abd9afd170c81f21", "name": "Belarus 2008 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 110)", "metadata": {"country": "Belarus", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Belarus lower-house election 2008, CONSTITUENCY level (110 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_belarusian_agrarian_party": "Belarusian Agrarian Party", "votes_communist_party_of_belarus": "Communist Party of Belarus", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_none_of_the_above": "NONE OF THE ABOVE", "votes_others": "Others"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 110, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:14:06.967953", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.492, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.076, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.224, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.096, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.492, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.123, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.076, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.269, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.157, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.039, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.064, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.076, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.019, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.096, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.096, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.264, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.264, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.574, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.043, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.359, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.359, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.205, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 110}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f1026b67b504425e91c2c2bbf26aa33f", "name": "Belarus 2004 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 110)", "metadata": {"country": "Belarus", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Belarus lower-house election 2004, CONSTITUENCY level (110 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_belarusian_party_of_communists": "BELARUSIAN PARTY OF COMMUNISTS", "votes_belarusian_social_democratic_assembl": "BELARUSIAN SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC ASSEMBLY", "votes_belarusian_social_democratic_party_p": "BELARUSIAN SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY (POPULAR ASSEMBLY)", "votes_belarusian_agrarian_party": "Belarusian Agrarian Party", "votes_communist_party_of_belarus": "COMMUNIST PARTY OF BELARUS", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_liberal_democratic_party": "LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY", "votes_none_of_the_above": "NONE OF THE ABOVE", "votes_party_of_the_belarusian_popular_fron": "PARTY OF THE BELARUSIAN POPULAR FRONT", "votes_republican_party": "REPUBLICAN PARTY", "votes_social_democratic_party_of_people_s_": "SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF PEOPLE'S ACCORD", "votes_united_civic_party": "UNITED CIVIC PARTY"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 110, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:14:04.513212", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.556, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 0.845, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.24, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.097, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.139, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.211, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.501, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.233, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.058, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.064, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.048, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.012, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.24, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.24, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.097, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.097, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.272, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.272, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.576, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.576, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.043, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.359, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.359, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.235, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.235, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 110}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "28f9c77fddde4dd183d47516ff9a3548", "name": "Bangladesh 1996 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 300)", "metadata": {"country": "Bangladesh", "year": 1996, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Bangladesh lower-house election 1996, CONSTITUENCY level (300 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bangladesh_islami_front": "Bangladesh Islami Front", "votes_bangladesh_janata_party": "Bangladesh Janata Party", "votes_bangladesh_jatiyabadi_awami_league_m": "Bangladesh Jatiyabadi Awami League (Mostofa Allama)", "votes_bangladesh_khalafat_andolon": "Bangladesh Khalafat Andolon", "votes_bangladesh_muslim_league_jamir_ali": "Bangladesh Muslim League (Jamir Ali)", "votes_bangladesh_national_awami_parti_nap_": "Bangladesh National Awami Parti (Nap Vasani)", "votes_bangladesh_national_awami_party_nap": "Bangladesh National Awami Party (NAP)", "votes_bangladesh_nationalist_party": "Bangladesh Nationalist Party", "votes_bangladesh_samajtantrik_dal_mahbub": "Bangladesh Samajtantrik Dal (Mahbub)", "votes_bangladesh_workers_party": "Bangladesh Workers Party", "votes_bangladesher_samajtantrik_dal_khalek": "Bangladesher Samajtantrik Dal (Khalekuzzaman)", "votes_democratic_republican_party": "Democratic Republican Party", "votes_freedom_party": "Freedom Party", "votes_gano_forum": "Gano Forum", "votes_gonotantri_party": "Gonotantri Party\u00a0", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_islami_oikya_jote": "Islami Oikya Jote", "votes_islami_shasantantra_andolon": "Islami Shasantantra Andolon", "votes_jaker_party": "Jaker Party", "votes_jamat_e_islami_bangladesh": "Jamat-E-Islami Bangladesh", "votes_jamiate_ulumaye_islam_bangladesh": "Jamiate Ulumaye Islam Bangladesh", "votes_jatiya_janata_party_nurul_islam": "Jatiya Janata Party (Nurul Islam)", "votes_jatiya_janata_party_sheikh_asad": "Jatiya Janata Party (Sheikh Asad)", "votes_jatiya_party": "Jatiya Party", "votes_jatiya_samajtantrik_dal_inu": "Jatiya Samajtantrik Dal (Inu)", "votes_jatiya_samajtantrik_dal_rab": "Jatiya Samajtantrik Dal (Rab)", "votes_sammilita_sangram_parishad": "Sammilita Sangram Parishad", "votes_samridha_bangladesh_andolon": "Samridha Bangladesh Andolon", "votes_bangladesh_awami_league": "bangladesh awami league", "votes_bangladesh_communist_party": "bangladesh communist party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 300, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 9}, "n_stations_flagged": 9, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:14:01.152651", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.923, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.552, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.506, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.271, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.923, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.731, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.347, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.707, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.153, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.244, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.311, "year": 1996, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.176, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.271, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.271, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.209, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.209, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.654, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.487, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.487, "year": 1996, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 300}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "48f91616f3864f02bb2dc5dd399bd38b", "name": "Azerbaijan 2015 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 124)", "metadata": {"country": "Azerbaijan", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Azerbaijan lower-house election 2015 (11.0), CONSTITUENCY level (124 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_azerbaijan_communist_party": "Azerbaijan Communist Party", "votes_azerbaijan_democrat_party": "Azerbaijan Democrat Party", "votes_azerbaijan_democratic_enlightenment_": "Azerbaijan Democratic Enlightenment Party", "votes_azerbaijan_hope_party": "Azerbaijan Hope Party", "votes_azerbaijan_national_democratic_party": "Azerbaijan National Democratic Party (Bozqurd)", "votes_azerbaijan_national_independence_par": "Azerbaijan National Independence Party", "votes_azerbaijan_political_party_of_democr": "Azerbaijan Political Party of Democratic Reforms", "votes_azerbaijan_popular_front_party": "Azerbaijan Popular Front Party", "votes_azerbaijan_popular_party": "Azerbaijan Popular Party", "votes_azerbaijan_social_democrat_party": "Azerbaijan Social Democrat Party", "votes_azerbaijan_social_welfare_party": "Azerbaijan Social Welfare Party", "votes_citizen_and_development_party": "Citizen and Development Party", "votes_civil_solidarity_party": "Civil Solidarity Party", "votes_civil_union_party": "Civil Union Party", "votes_classic_popular_front_party": "Classic Popular Front Party", "votes_democratic_azerbaijan_world_party": "Democratic Azerbaijan World Party", "votes_equality_party": "Equality Party", "votes_great_azerbaijan_party": "Great Azerbaijan Party", "votes_great_creation_party": "Great Creation Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_justice_party": "Justice Party", "votes_motherland_party": "Motherland Party", "votes_national_revival_movement_party": "National Revival Movement Party", "votes_new_azerbaijan_party": "New Azerbaijan Party", "votes_unity_party": "Unity Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 124, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 124, "registered_not_positive": 124}, "n_stations_flagged": 124, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:13:58.082592", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.454, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.466, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.193, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.063, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.454, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.466, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.366, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.016, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.254, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.058, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.015, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.133, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.033, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.045, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.549, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.137, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.193, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.063, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.063, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.142, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.142, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.434, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.012, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.012, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.169, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.169, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 124}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d3a252e0093d4e2c8b863efef7398d7e", "name": "Australia 2022 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 151)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Australia lower-house election 2022, CONSTITUENCY level (151 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_animal_justice_party": "Animal Justice Party", "votes_australian_christians": "Australian Christians", "votes_australian_federation_party": "Australian Federation Party", "votes_australian_labor_party": "Australian Labor Party", "votes_australian_values_party": "Australian Values Party", "votes_centre_alliance": "Centre Alliance", "votes_derryn_hinch_s_justice_party": "Derryn Hinch's Justice Party", "votes_fusion_science_pirate_secular_climat": "FUSION: Science, Pirate, Secular, Climate Emergency", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_indigenous_aboriginal_part_of_austra": "Indigenous - Aboriginal Part of Australia", "votes_informed_medical_options_party": "Informed Medical Options Party", "votes_jacqui_lambie_network": "Jacqui Lambie Network", "votes_katter_s_australian_party_kap": "Katter's Australian Party (KAP)", "votes_legalise_cannabis_australia": "Legalise Cannabis Australia", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_democrats": "Liberal Democrats", "votes_liberal_national_party_of_queensland": "Liberal National Party of Queensland", "votes_nt_clp": "NT CLP", "votes_pauline_hanson_s_one_nation": "Pauline Hanson's One Nation", "votes_queensland_greens": "Queensland Greens", "votes_shooters_fishers_and_farmers_party": "Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party", "votes_socialist_alliance": "Socialist Alliance", "votes_the_great_australian_party": "The Great Australian Party", "votes_the_greens": "The Greens", "votes_the_greens_wa": "The Greens (WA)", "votes_the_nationals": "The Nationals", "votes_the_new_liberals": "The New Liberals", "votes_united_australia_party": "United Australia Party", "votes_victorian_socialists": "Victorian Socialists", "votes_western_australia_party": "WESTERN AUSTRALIA PARTY", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 151, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:13:54.937594", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.841, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.794, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.067, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.919, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.033, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.033, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 151}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2a4ac5ee0a2a4649b8498f9de843ac50", "name": "Australia 2019 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 151)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Australia lower-house election 2019, CONSTITUENCY level (151 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_animal_justice_party": "Animal Justice Party", "votes_australian_christians": "Australian Christians", "votes_australian_labor_party": "Australian Labor Party", "votes_australian_labor_party_northern_terr": "Australian Labor Party (Northern Territory) Branch", "votes_australian_progressives": "Australian Progressives", "votes_centre_alliance": "Centre Alliance", "votes_christian_democratic_party_fred_nile": "Christian Democratic Party (Fred Nile Group)", "votes_country_liberals_nt": "Country Liberals (NT)", "votes_democratic_labour_party": "Democratic Labour Party", "votes_derryn_hinch_s_justice_party": "Derryn Hinch's Justice Party", "votes_fraser_anning_s_conservative_nationa": "FRASER ANNING'S CONSERVATIVE NATIONAL PARTY", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_katter_s_australian_party_kap": "Katter's Australian Party (KAP)", "votes_labor": "Labor", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_democrats": "Liberal Democrats", "votes_liberal_national_party_of_queensland": "Liberal National Party of Queensland", "votes_pauline_hanson_s_one_nation": "Pauline Hanson's One Nation", "votes_reason_australia": "Reason Australia", "votes_rise_up_australia_party": "Rise Up Australia Party", "votes_science_party": "Science Party", "votes_shooters_fishers_and_farmers": "Shooters, Fishers and Farmers", "votes_sustainable_australia": "Sustainable Australia", "votes_the_greens": "The Greens", "votes_the_greens_vic": "The Greens (VIC)", "votes_the_greens_wa": "The Greens (WA)", "votes_the_nationals": "The Nationals", "votes_united_australia_party": "United Australia Party", "votes_victorian_socialists": "Victorian Socialists", "votes_western_australia_party": "WESTERN AUSTRALIA PARTY", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 151, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:13:51.578061", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.649, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.93, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.825, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.779, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.649, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.19, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.019, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.033, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.033, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.887, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 151}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4028db5a4274408bb77eef91ac27ce35", "name": "Australia 2016 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 150)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Australia lower-house election 2016, CONSTITUENCY level (150 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_animal_justice_party": "animal justice party", "votes_arts_party": "arts party", "votes_australia_first_party_nsw_incorporat": "australia first party (nsw) incorporated", "votes_australian_christians": "australian christians", "votes_australian_country_party": "australian country party", "votes_australian_greens": "australian greens", "votes_australian_labor_party": "australian labor party", "votes_australian_liberty_alliance": "australian liberty alliance", "votes_australian_recreational_fishers_part": "australian recreational fishers party", "votes_australian_sex_party": "australian sex party", "votes_bullet_train_for_australia": "bullet train for australia", "votes_christian_democratic_party_fred_nile": "christian democratic party (fred nile group)", "votes_country_liberals_northern_territory": "country liberals (northern territory)", "votes_derryn_hinch_s_justice_party": "derryn hinch's justice party", "votes_drug_law_reform": "drug law reform", "votes_family_first_party": "family first party", "votes_glenn_lazarus_team": "glenn lazarus team", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_katter_s_australian_party": "katter's australian party", "votes_liberal_democratic_party": "liberal democratic party", "votes_liberal_national_party_of_queensland": "liberal national party of queensland", "votes_liberal_party_of_australia": "liberal party of australia", "votes_national_party_of_australia": "national party of australia", "votes_nick_xenophon_team": "nick xenophon team", "votes_online_direct_democracy_empowering_t": "online direct democracy - (empowering the people!)", "votes_pauline_hanson_s_one_nation": "pauline hanson's one nation", "votes_renewable_energy_party": "renewable energy party", "votes_rise_up_australia_party": "rise up australia party", "votes_science_party": "science party", "votes_shooters_fishers_and_farmers": "shooters, fishers and farmers", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 150, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 150}, "n_stations_flagged": 150, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:13:47.998728", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.937, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.871, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.833, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.937, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.876, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.038, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.038, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 150}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "12067f72733e44ab957a960764e3cf35", "name": "Australia 2013 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 150)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Australia lower-house election 2013, CONSTITUENCY level (150 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_animal_justice_party": "animal justice party", "votes_australia_first_party_nsw_incorporat": "australia first party (nsw) incorporated", "votes_australia_s_first_nations_political_": "australia's first nations political party", "votes_australian_christians": "australian christians", "votes_australian_democrats": "australian democrats", "votes_australian_greens": "australian greens", "votes_australian_independents": "australian independents", "votes_australian_labor_party": "australian labor party", "votes_australian_sex_party": "australian sex party", "votes_australian_stable_population_party": "australian stable population party", "votes_australian_voice_party": "australian voice party", "votes_bullet_train_for_australia": "bullet train for australia", "votes_christian_democratic_party_fred_nile": "christian democratic party (fred nile group)", "votes_citizens_electoral_council_of_austra": "citizens electoral council of australia", "votes_country_alliance": "country alliance", "votes_country_labor_party": "country labor party", "votes_country_liberals_northern_territory": "country liberals (northern territory)", "votes_democratic_labor_party": "democratic labor party", "votes_family_first_party": "family first party", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_katter_s_australian_party": "katter's australian party", "votes_liberal_democratic_party": "liberal democratic party", "votes_liberal_national_party_of_queensland": "liberal national party of queensland", "votes_liberal_party_of_australia": "liberal party of australia", "votes_national_party_of_australia": "national party of australia", "votes_one_nation": "one nation", "votes_palmer_united_party": "palmer united party", "votes_rise_up_australia_party": "rise up australia party", "votes_secular_party_of_australia": "secular party of australia", "votes_socialist_alliance": "socialist alliance", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 150, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:13:44.329964", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.909, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.727, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.862, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.821, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.727, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.479, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.114, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.528, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.983, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.04, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.04, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 150}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7c9022d99f6d422cb27d60e2eff2257b", "name": "Australia 2010 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 150)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Australia lower-house election 2010, CONSTITUENCY level (150 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_australia_first_party_nsw_incorporat": "australia first party (nsw) incorporated", "votes_australian_democrats": "australian democrats", "votes_australian_greens": "australian greens", "votes_australian_labor_party": "australian labor party", "votes_australian_sex_party": "australian sex party", "votes_building_australia_party": "building australia party", "votes_carers_alliance": "carers alliance", "votes_christian_democratic_party_fred_nile": "christian democratic party (fred nile group)", "votes_citizens_electoral_council_of_austra": "citizens electoral council of australia", "votes_communist_alliance": "communist alliance", "votes_country_labor_party": "country labor party", "votes_country_liberals_northern_territory": "country liberals (northern territory)", "votes_democratic_labor_party": "democratic labor party", "votes_family_first_party": "family first party", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_liberal_democratic_party": "liberal democratic party", "votes_liberal_national_party_of_queensland": "liberal national party of queensland", "votes_liberal_party_of_australia": "liberal party of australia", "votes_national_party_of_australia": "national party of australia", "votes_non_custodial_parents_party_equal_pa": "non-custodial parents party (equal parenting)", "votes_one_nation": "one nation", "votes_secular_party_of_australia": "secular party of australia", "votes_socialist_alliance": "socialist alliance", "votes_socialist_equality_party": "socialist equality party", "votes_the_climate_sceptics": "the climate sceptics"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 150, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:13:41.457942", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.905, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.947, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.856, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.905, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.947, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.722, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.108, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.991, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.035, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 150}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7adbd183461d4c93a0767033f7db1f6e", "name": "Australia 2007 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 150)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Australia lower-house election 2007, CONSTITUENCY level (150 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_australian_democrats": "australian democrats", "votes_australian_greens": "australian greens", "votes_australian_labor_party": "australian labor party", "votes_christian_democratic_party_fred_nile": "christian democratic party (fred nile group)", "votes_citizens_electoral_council_of_austra": "citizens electoral council of australia", "votes_climate_change_coalition": "climate change coalition", "votes_conservatives_for_climate_and_enviro": "conservatives for climate and environment incorporated", "votes_country_labor_party": "country labor party", "votes_country_liberals_northern_territory": "country liberals (northern territory)", "votes_democratic_labor_party": "democratic labor party", "votes_family_first_party": "family first party", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_liberal_democratic_party": "liberal democratic party", "votes_liberal_party_of_australia": "liberal party of australia", "votes_national_party_of_australia": "national party of australia", "votes_non_custodial_parents_party_equal_pa": "non-custodial parents party (equal parenting)", "votes_one_nation": "one nation", "votes_socialist_alliance": "socialist alliance", "votes_socialist_equality_party": "socialist equality party", "votes_the_fishing_party": "the fishing party", "votes_what_women_want_australia": "what women want (australia)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 150, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:13:37.945262", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.87, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.941, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.88, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.839, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.924, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.726, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.801, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.08, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.52, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.785, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.99, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.035, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 150}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dac2097959ff4c46b6e467d5afc475ca", "name": "Australia 2004 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 150)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Australia lower-house election 2004, CONSTITUENCY level (150 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_australian_democrats": "australian democrats", "votes_australian_greens": "australian greens", "votes_australian_labor_party": "australian labor party", "votes_christian_democratic_party": "christian democratic party", "votes_citizens_electoral_council_of_austra": "citizens electoral council of australia", "votes_democratic_labor_party": "democratic labor party", "votes_family_first_party": "family first party", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_liberal_party_of_australia": "liberal party of australia", "votes_liberals_for_forests": "liberals for forests", "votes_national_party_of_australia": "national party of australia", "votes_one_nation": "one nation", "votes_progressive_labor": "progressive labor", "votes_socialist_party_of_australia": "socialist party of australia"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 150, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:13:34.514071", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.757, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.879, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.838, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.757, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.867, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.705, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.801, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.499, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.785, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.99, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.035, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.965, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 150}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b64a6e21c6c34d60acbe871d8fe0ef0f", "name": "Australia 2001 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 150)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2001, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Australia lower-house election 2001, CONSTITUENCY level (150 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_australian_democrats": "australian democrats", "votes_australian_greens": "australian greens", "votes_australian_labor_party": "australian labor party", "votes_australians_against_further_immigrat": "australians against further immigration", "votes_call_to_australia_fred_nile_group": "call to australia (fred nile) group", "votes_citizens_electoral_council_of_austra": "citizens electoral council of australia", "votes_country_liberals_northern_territory": "country liberals (northern territory)", "votes_curtin_labor_alliance": "curtin labor alliance", "votes_help_end_marijuana_prohibition_hemp_": "help end marijuana prohibition (hemp) party", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_liberal_party_of_australia": "liberal party of australia", "votes_liberals_for_forests": "liberals for forests", "votes_lower_excise_fuel_and_beer_party": "lower excise fuel and beer party", "votes_national_party_of_australia": "national party of australia", "votes_no_goods_and_services_tax_party": "no goods and services tax party", "votes_non_custodial_parents_party_equal_pa": "non-custodial parents party (equal parenting)", "votes_one_nation": "one nation", "votes_outdoor_recreation_party": "outdoor recreation party", "votes_progressive_labor": "progressive labor", "votes_save_the_adi_site_party": "save the adi site party", "votes_tasmania_first_party": "tasmania first party", "votes_the_fishing_party": "the fishing party", "votes_the_greens_wa_inc": "the greens (wa) inc", "votes_unity_say_no_to_hanson": "unity say no to hanson"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 150, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:13:31.479243", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.755, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.885, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.844, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.755, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.687, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.801, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.99, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.035, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 150}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8bf621ad738240fbb28cc361193be2e0", "name": "Australia 1998 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 148)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 1998, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Australia lower-house election 1998, CONSTITUENCY level (148 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_abolish_child_support_family_court_p": "abolish child support/family court party", "votes_australia_first_party": "australia first party", "votes_australian_christian_heritage_christ": "australian christian heritage-christian democratic party", "votes_australian_democrats": "australian democrats", "votes_australian_greens": "australian greens", "votes_australian_labor_party": "australian labor party", "votes_australian_reform_party": "australian reform party", "votes_australian_women_s_party": "australian women's party", "votes_call_to_australia_fred_nile_group": "call to australia (fred nile) group", "votes_citizens_electoral_council_of_austra": "citizens electoral council of australia", "votes_common_cause_no_aircraft_noise": "common cause no aircraft noise", "votes_country_liberals_northern_territory": "country liberals (northern territory)", "votes_democratic_socialist_electoral_leagu": "democratic socialist electoral league", "votes_family_law_reform_party": "family law reform party", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_eff": "independent eff", "votes_liberal_party_of_australia": "liberal party of australia", "votes_national_party_of_australia": "national party of australia", "votes_natural_law_party": "natural law party", "votes_one_nation": "one nation", "votes_progressive_labor": "progressive labor", "votes_republican_party_of_australia": "republican party of australia", "votes_shooters_and_fishers_party": "shooters and fishers party", "votes_socialist_equality_party": "socialist equality party", "votes_tasmania_first_party": "tasmania first party", "votes_the_greens_wa_inc": "the greens (wa) inc", "votes_unity_say_no_to_hanson": "unity say no to hanson"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 148, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:13:28.592203", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.754, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.841, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.611, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.801, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.468, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.99, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.035, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 148}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3db31cd49f884c57975b14f69e90895b", "name": "Australia 1996 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 148)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 1996, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Australia lower-house election 1996, CONSTITUENCY level (148 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_australia_s_indigenous_peoples_party": "australia's indigenous peoples party", "votes_australian_christian_heritage_christ": "australian christian heritage-christian democratic party", "votes_australian_democrats": "australian democrats", "votes_australian_greens": "australian greens", "votes_australian_greens_victoria": "australian greens victoria", "votes_australian_labor_party": "australian labor party", "votes_australian_women_s_party": "australian women's party", "votes_australians_against_further_immigrat": "australians against further immigration", "votes_call_to_australia_fred_nile_group": "call to australia (fred nile) group", "votes_central_coast_green_party": "central coast green party", "votes_common_cause_no_aircraft_noise": "common cause no aircraft noise", "votes_country_liberals_northern_territory": "country liberals (northern territory)", "votes_grey_power": "grey power", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_liberal_party_of_australia": "liberal party of australia", "votes_national_party_of_australia": "national party of australia", "votes_natural_law_party": "natural law party", "votes_one_australia_party": "one australia party", "votes_pensioner_c_i_r_alliance": "pensioner & c.i.r. alliance", "votes_reclaim_australia_reduce_immigration": "reclaim australia: reduce immigration", "votes_republican_party_of_australia": "republican party of australia", "votes_richmond_clarence_greens": "richmond/clarence greens", "votes_tasmanian_greens": "tasmanian greens", "votes_the_greens_wa_inc": "the greens (wa) inc"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 148, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:13:24.624553", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.754, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.891, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.849, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.605, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.801, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.47, "year": 1996, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.798, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.99, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.035, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 148}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f812475044cb4cc7908681458b687588", "name": "Australia 1993 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 147)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 1993, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Australia lower-house election 1993, CONSTITUENCY level (147 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_abolish_self_government_coalition": "abolish self government coalition", "votes_act_green_democratic_alliance": "act green democratic alliance", "votes_advance_australia_party": "advance australia party", "votes_australia_s_indigenous_peoples_party": "australia's indigenous peoples party", "votes_australian_democrats": "australian democrats", "votes_australian_greens": "australian greens", "votes_australian_labor_party": "australian labor party", "votes_australians_against_further_immigrat": "australians against further immigration", "votes_call_to_australia_fred_nile_group": "call to australia (fred nile) group", "votes_central_coast_green_party": "central coast green party", "votes_citizens_electoral_councils_of_austr": "citizens electoral councils of australia group", "votes_country_liberals_northern_territory": "country liberals (northern territory)", "votes_eastern_suburbs_greens": "eastern suburbs greens", "votes_greens_in_lowe": "greens in lowe", "votes_grey_power": "grey power", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_eff": "independent eff", "votes_liberal_party_of_australia": "liberal party of australia", "votes_national_party_of_australia": "national party of australia", "votes_natural_law_party": "natural law party", "votes_queensland_greens": "queensland greens", "votes_richmond_clarence_greens": "richmond/clarence greens", "votes_tasmanian_greens": "tasmanian greens", "votes_the_confederate_action_party_of_aust": "the confederate action party of australia", "votes_the_green_party_south_australia": "the green party south australia", "votes_the_greens_wa_inc": "the greens (wa) inc", "votes_western_suburbs_greens": "western suburbs greens"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 147, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 17}, "n_stations_flagged": 17, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:13:20.786865", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.754, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.895, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.89, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.849, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.593, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.801, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.47, "year": 1993, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.795, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.99, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.035, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 147}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dcea16c0be8a4e9095476981b83c95b8", "name": "Australia 1990 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 148)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 1990, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Australia lower-house election 1990, CONSTITUENCY level (148 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_australian_conservative_party": "Australian Conservative Party", "votes_australian_democrats": "Australian Democrats", "votes_australian_green_movement": "Australian Green Movement", "votes_australian_labor_party": "Australian Labor Party", "votes_call_to_australia_party": "Call to Australia Party", "votes_central_coast_green_party": "Central Coast Green Party", "votes_citizens_electoral_council_of_austra": "Citizens Electoral Council of Australia", "votes_combined_new_australia_party": "Combined New Australia Party", "votes_cooper_greens": "Cooper Greens", "votes_country_liberal_party": "Country Liberal Party", "votes_democratic_labor_party": "Democratic Labor Party", "votes_democratic_socialist_party": "Democratic Socialist Party", "votes_environment_independents": "Environment Independents", "votes_green_alliance": "Green Alliance", "votes_greens_in_lowe": "Greens in Lowe", "votes_grey_power": "Grey Power", "votes_illawara_greens": "Illawara Greens", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_eff": "Independent EFF", "votes_liberal_party": "Liberal Party", "votes_national_party": "National Party", "votes_nuclear_disarmament_party": "Nuclear Disarmament Party", "votes_rex_connor_labor_party": "Rex Connor Labor Party", "votes_socialist_party_of_australia": "Socialist Party of Australia", "votes_south_sydney_greens": "South Sydney Greens", "votes_sydney_greens": "Sydney Greens", "votes_the_green_party_of_australia": "The Green Party of Australia", "votes_united_tasmanian_group": "United Tasmanian Group", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_western_australia_green_party": "Western Australia Green Party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 148, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:13:18.063546", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.752, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.892, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.851, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.612, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.801, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 1990, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.798, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 1990, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.99, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.035, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 148}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1e6825fa9d5a4059a33e964f8dec6f4d", "name": "Australia 1987 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 148)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 1987, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Australia lower-house election 1987, CONSTITUENCY level (148 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_australian_democrats": "australian democrats", "votes_australian_family_movement": "australian family movement", "votes_australian_labor_party": "australian labor party", "votes_communist_party_of_australia": "communist party of australia", "votes_country_liberal_party": "country liberal party", "votes_democratic_labor_party": "democratic labor party", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_liberal_party_of_australia": "liberal party of australia", "votes_national_party_of_australia": "national party of australia", "votes_nuclear_disarmament_party": "nuclear disarmament party", "votes_pensioner_party_of_australia": "pensioner party of australia", "votes_socialist_workers_party": "socialist workers party", "votes_united_australia_party": "united australia party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 148, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:13:14.830299", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.751, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.889, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.885, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.844, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.751, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.613, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.801, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.132, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.533, "year": 1987, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.787, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.99, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.035, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 148}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8ce3f15326e44084af8fd85a3d981dec", "name": "Albania 2001 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 101)", "metadata": {"country": "Albania", "year": 2001, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Albania lower-house election 2001, CONSTITUENCY level (101 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_partia_agrare_e_shqip_ris_pash": "Partia Agrare e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb (PASH)", "votes_partia_aleanca_demokratike_ad": "Partia Aleanca Demokratike (AD)", "votes_partia_alternativa_liberale_palsh": "Partia Alternativa Liberale (PALSH)", "votes_partia_bashkimi_demokrat_pbdsh": "Partia Bashkimi Demokrat (PBDSH)", "votes_partia_bashkimi_demokristian_shqipta": "Partia Bashkimi Demokristian Shqiptar (PBDKSH)", "votes_partia_bashkimi_republikan_shqiptar_": "Partia Bashkimi Republikan Shqiptar (PBRSH)", "votes_partia_bashkimi_p_r_t_drejtat_e_njer": "Partia Bashkimi p\u00ebr t\u00eb Drejtat e Njeriut (PBDNJ)", "votes_partia_bashk_sia_komb_tare_shqiptare": "Partia Bashk\u00ebsia Komb\u00ebtare Shqiptare (PBKSH)", "votes_partia_biznesi_shqiptar_pbsh": "Partia Biznesi Shqiptar (PBSH)", "votes_partia_centraliste_e_mir_q_nies_popu": "Partia Centraliste e Mir\u00ebq\u00ebnies Popullore (PMP)", "votes_partia_demokrate_pd": "Partia Demokrate (PD)", "votes_partia_demokrate_bashkimi_p_r_fitore": "Partia Demokrate+Bashkimi p\u00ebr Fitoren (PD+BF)", "votes_partia_demokristiane_e_shqip_ris_pdk": "Partia Demokristiane e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb (PDK)", "votes_partia_emigracioni_shqiptar_pesh": "Partia Emigracioni Shqiptar (PESH)", "votes_partia_forca_albania_pfa": "Partia Forca Albania (PFA)", "votes_partia_komb_tare_konservatore_shqipt": "Partia Komb\u00ebtare Konservatore Shqiptare (P.KONS)", "votes_partia_komuniste_shqiptare_pksh": "Partia Komuniste Shqiptare (PKSH)", "votes_partia_lidhja_fshatare_plfsh": "Partia Lidhja Fshatare (PLFSH)", "votes_partia_lidhja_komb_tare_shqiptare_pl": "Partia Lidhja Komb\u00ebtare Shqiptare (PLKSH)", "votes_partia_l_vizja_monarkiste_demokrate_": "Partia L\u00ebvizja Monarkiste Demokrate Shqiptare (PL. Monarkiste)", "votes_partia_l_vizja_pun_tore_shqiptare_pl": "Partia L\u00ebvizja Pun\u00ebtore Shqiptare (PLPSH)", "votes_partia_pajtimi_komb_tar_shqiptar_ppk": "Partia Pajtimi Komb\u00ebtar Shqiptar (PPK)", "votes_partia_shqiptare_ambientaliste_psha": "Partia Shqiptare Ambientaliste (PSHA)", "votes_partia_social_demokrate_psd": "Partia Social Demokrate (PSD)", "votes_partia_social_kristiane_e_shqip_ris_": "Partia Social kristiane e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb (PSKSH)", "votes_partia_socialiste_e_shqip_ris_pssh": "Partia Socialiste e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb (PSSH)", "votes_partia_uniteti_komb_tar_puk": "Partia Uniteti Komb\u00ebtar (PUK)", "votes_partia_e_komunist_ve_t_bashkuar_t_sh": "Partia e Komunist\u00ebve t\u00eb Bashkuar t\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb (PKBSH)", "votes_partia_e_reformave_demokratike_shqip": "Partia e Reformave Demokratike Shqiptare (PRDSH)", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 101, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T20:13:12.293568", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.161, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.4, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.438, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.366, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.161, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.4, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.018, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.268, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.827, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.262, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.566, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.758, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.366, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.366, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.323, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.323, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.621, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 101}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "75f389f5818f4d2c917469fcef072660", "name": "Lesotho 2002 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 160)", "metadata": {"country": "Lesotho", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Lesotho lower-house election 2002, CONSTITUENCY level (160 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_basotho_congress_party": "Basotho Congress Party", "votes_basotho_national_party": "Basotho National Party", "votes_basutoland_african_congress": "Basutoland African Congress", "votes_christian_democratic_party": "Christian Democratic Party", "votes_independent_1": "Independent 1", "votes_independent_2": "Independent 2", "votes_independent_3": "Independent 3", "votes_kopanang_basotho_party": "Kopanang Basotho Party", "votes_lesotho_communist_party": "Lesotho Communist Party", "votes_lesotho_congress_for_democracy": "Lesotho Congress for Democracy", "votes_lesotho_education_party": "Lesotho Education Party", "votes_lesotho_labour_party_united_democrat": "Lesotho Labour Party/United Democratic Party", "votes_lesotho_people_s_congress": "Lesotho People\u0092s Congress", "votes_lesotho_workers_party": "Lesotho Workers Party", "votes_marematlou_freedom_party": "Marematlou Freedom Party", "votes_national_democratic_party": "National Democratic Party", "votes_national_independent_party": "National Independent Party", "votes_national_progressive_party": "National Progressive Party", "votes_new_lesotho_freedom_party": "New Lesotho Freedom Party", "votes_popular_front_for_democracy_khoeetsa": "Popular Front for Democracy/Khoeetsa ea Sechaba", "votes_sefate_democratic_union": "Sefate Democratic Union", "votes_social_democracy_party": "Social Democracy Party", "votes_united_party": "United Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 160, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:10:48.785927", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.69, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.802, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.377, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.69, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.802, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.313, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.681, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.377, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.377, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.421, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.571, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.691, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 160}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "064ea7f2e0fe444797ac97d3feab40ac", "name": "Korea 2012 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 263)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Korea lower-house election 2012, CONSTITUENCY level (263 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bul_gyo_yeonhap_dang": "bul gyo yeonhap-dang", "votes_changjo_hanguk_dang": "changjo hanguk-dang", "votes_cheongnyeon_dang": "cheongnyeon-dang", "votes_chinbak_yeonhap": "chinbak yeonhap", "votes_dae_hanguk_dang": "dae hanguk-dang", "votes_gaja_daegukmin_joongsim_dang": "gaja, daegukmin joongsim-dang", "votes_gidok_dang": "gidok-dang", "votes_gungmin_haeng_bok_dang": "gungmin haeng bok-dang", "votes_gungmin_saenggak": "gungmin saenggak", "votes_gungminui_him": "gungminui him", "votes_hankuk_gidok_dang": "hankuk  gidok-dang", "votes_hankuk_munhwa_yesul_dang": "hankuk munhwa yesul-dang", "votes_hannara_dang": "hannara-dang", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_jayu_seonjin_dang": "jayu seonjin-dang", "votes_jeongtong_minju_dang": "jeongtong minju-dang", "votes_jinbo_shin_dang": "jinbo shin-dang", "votes_mi_rae_yeonhap": "mi rae yeonhap", "votes_min_ju_tong_hap_dang": "min ju tong hap-dang", "votes_minju_tongil_dang": "minju tongil-dang", "votes_noksaek_dang": "noksaek-dang", "votes_saenuri_dang": "saenuri-dang", "votes_tonghap_jinbo_dang": "tonghap jinbo-dang"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 263, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:10:30.946332", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 263}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d3139ce4e3de48b084b2d214a450cc32", "name": "Korea 2008 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 261)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Korea lower-house election 2008, CONSTITUENCY level (261 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_changjo_hanguk_dang": "changjo hanguk-dang", "votes_chinbak_yeondae": "chinbak yeondae", "votes_gidok_dang": "gidok-dang", "votes_guguk_chamsaram_yeonhap": "guguk chamsaram yeonhap", "votes_gungmin_shilhyang_ahnbo_dang": "gungmin shilhyang ahnbo-dang", "votes_hanguk_sahoe_dang": "hanguk sahoe-dang", "votes_hannara_dang": "hannara-dang", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_jayu_seonjin_dang": "jayu seonjin-dang", "votes_jikneung_yeonhap_dang": "jikneung yeonhap-dang", "votes_jinbo_shin_dang": "jinbo shin-dang", "votes_minju_nodong_dang": "minju nodong-dang", "votes_munhwa_yesul_dang": "munhwa yesul-dang", "votes_pyunghwa_tongil_gajeong_dang": "pyunghwa tongil gajeong-dang", "votes_shimin_dang": "shimin-dang", "votes_shin_mirae_dang": "shin mirae-dang", "votes_tonghap_minju_dang": "tonghap minju-dang", "votes_tongil_dang": "tongil-dang"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 261, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:10:10.622083", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 261}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "198e62a8a4494a5caf43cc95637f2646", "name": "Korea 2004 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 259)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Korea lower-house election 2004, CONSTITUENCY level (259 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_gaja_heemang_2080": "gaja, heemang 2080", "votes_gidok_dang": "gidok-dang", "votes_gonghwa_dang": "gonghwa-dang", "votes_guguk_chong_yeonhap": "guguk chong yeonhap", "votes_hannara_dang": "hannara-dang", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_jayu_minju_yeonhap": "jayu minju yeonhap", "votes_minju_gungmin_dang": "minju gungmin-dang", "votes_minju_hwahap_dang": "minju hwahap-dang", "votes_minju_nodong_dang": "minju nodong-dang", "votes_noksaek_sahmin_dang": "noksaek sahmin-dang", "votes_rohnyeon_gwonik_boho_dang": "rohnyeon gwonik boho-dang", "votes_saecheonnyeon_minju_dang": "saecheonnyeon minju-dang", "votes_sahoe_dang": "sahoe-dang", "votes_tong_hap21": "tong hap21", "votes_yeollin_uri_party": "yeollin uri party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 259, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:09:40.461582", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 259}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2530efa829f8466181c6a7d82997c8e9", "name": "Korea 2000 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 227)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 2000, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Korea lower-house election 2000 (April), CONSTITUENCY level (227 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_cheongnyeon_jinbo_dang": "Cheongnyeon Jinbo-dang", "votes_gonghwa_dang": "Gonghwa-dang", "votes_hanguk_sin_dang": "Hanguk Sin-dang", "votes_hannara_dang": "Hannara-dang", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jayu_minju_yeonhap": "Jayu Minju Yeonhap", "votes_minju_nodong_dang": "Minju Nodong-dang", "votes_minju_gungmin_dang": "Minju gungmin-dang", "votes_saecheonnyeon_minju_dang": "Saecheonnyeon Minju-dang"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 227, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:09:16.304101", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 227}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "825a9070b5724984be467013d47bf1fc", "name": "Korea 1996 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 253)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 1996, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Korea lower-house election 1996 (April), CONSTITUENCY level (253 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_21_segi_handok_dang": "21 Segi Handok-dang", "votes_chinmin_dang": "Chinmin-dang", "votes_daehan_minju_dang": "Daehan Minju-dang", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jayu_minju_yeonhap": "Jayu Minju Yeonhap", "votes_mudangpa_gungmin_yeonhap": "Mudangpa Gungmin-yeonhap", "votes_saejeongchi_gungminhoeui": "Saejeongchi Gungminhoeui", "votes_sin_hankuk_dang": "Sin Hankuk-dang", "votes_tonghap_minju_dang": "Tonghap Minju-dang"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 253, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:08:53.186400", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 253}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8c0882c4316344c29f2902d0da5ab214", "name": "Korea 1992 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 237)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 1992, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Korea lower-house election 1992 (March), CONSTITUENCY level (237 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_gongmyong_minju_dang": "Gongmyong Minju-dang", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_minju_jayu_dang": "Minju Jayu-dang", "votes_minju_dang": "Minju-dang", "votes_minjung_dang": "Minjung-dang", "votes_sinjungchi_gaehyeok_dang": "Sinjungchi Gaehyeok-dang", "votes_tongil_gungmin_dang": "Tongil Gungmin-dang"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 237, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:08:34.382696", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 237}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "23ba0d8d999748758823249a9186aac9", "name": "Korea 1988 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 224)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 1988, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Korea lower-house election 1988 (April), CONSTITUENCY level (224 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_gidok_seongmin_dang": "Gidok Seongmin-dang", "votes_hanguk_gungmin_dang": "Hanguk Gungmin-dang", "votes_hanjuui_tongil_hanguk_dang": "Hanjuui Tongil Hanguk-dang", "votes_hankyoreh_minju_dang": "Hankyoreh Minju-dang", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jesamsedae_dang": "Jesamsedae-dang", "votes_minju_hanguk_dang": "Minju Hanguk-dang", "votes_minju_jeongui_dang": "Minju Jeongui-dang", "votes_minjungui_dang": "Minjungui-dang", "votes_pyunghwa_minju_dang": "Pyunghwa Minju-dang", "votes_sahoe_minju_dang": "Sahoe Minju-dang", "votes_sin_minju_gonghwa_dang": "Sin Minju Gonghwa-dang", "votes_sinhan_minju_dang": "Sinhan Minju-dang", "votes_tongil_minju_dang": "Tongil Minju-dang", "votes_uri_jeongui_dang": "Uri Jeongui-dang"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 224, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:08:19.213022", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 224}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "46d114575a724b138ec64ef7c23f42a1", "name": "Korea 1971 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 153)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 1971, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Korea lower-house election 1971 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (153 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_daejung_dang": "Daejung-dang", "votes_gungmin_dang": "Gungmin-dang", "votes_minju_gonghwa_dang": "Minju Gonghwa-dang", "votes_minjung_dang": "Minjung-dang", "votes_sinmin_dang": "Sinmin-dang", "votes_tongil_sahoe_dang": "Tongil Sahoe-dang"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 153, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 33, "cast_valid_mismatch": 17, "registered_not_positive": 33}, "n_stations_flagged": 50, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:08:10.793366", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 153}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "67fb3c748c01471bbbbddd3a87da5945", "name": "Korea 1967 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 131)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 1967, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Korea lower-house election 1967 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (131 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_daejung_dang": "Daejung-dang", "votes_hanguk_dongnip_dang": "Hanguk Dongnip-dang", "votes_jamin_dang": "Jamin-dang", "votes_jayu_dang": "Jayu-dang", "votes_jeongui_dang": "Jeongui-dang", "votes_minju_gonghwa_dang": "Minju Gonghwa-dang", "votes_minju_dang": "Minju-dang", "votes_minjung_dang": "Minjung-dang", "votes_sinmin_dang": "Sinmin-dang", "votes_tongil_sahoe_dang": "Tongil Sahoe-dang", "votes_tonhan_dang": "Tonhan-dang"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 131, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3, "registered_not_positive": 71, "cast_gt_registered": 71}, "n_stations_flagged": 74, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:08:03.183190", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 131}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c38724bf2e1d4e75a498e87ee8d24419", "name": "Korea 1963 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 131)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 1963, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Korea lower-house election 1963 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (131 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bosu_dang": "Bosu-dang", "votes_chupung_hoe": "Chupung-hoe", "votes_gungminui_dang": "Gungminui-dang", "votes_hanguk_dongnip_dang": "Hanguk Dongnip-dang", "votes_jayu_minju_dang": "Jayu Minju-dang", "votes_jayu_dang": "Jayu-dang", "votes_jeongmin_hoe": "Jeongmin-hoe", "votes_minjeong_dang": "Minjeong-dang", "votes_minju_gonghwa_dang": "Minju Gonghwa-dang", "votes_minju_dang": "Minju-dang", "votes_shinheung_dang": "Shinheung-dang", "votes_sinmin_hoe": "Sinmin-hoe"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 131, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3, "registered_not_positive": 71, "cast_gt_registered": 71}, "n_stations_flagged": 74, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:07:55.741388", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 131}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ab0689461e154401b1e1b40c829fb2af", "name": "Korea 1960 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 233)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 1960, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Korea lower-house election 1960 (July), CONSTITUENCY level (233 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_hanguk_dongnip_dang": "Hanguk Dongnip-dang", "votes_hanguk_sahoe_dang": "Hanguk Sahoe-dang", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jayu_dang": "Jayu-dang", "votes_minju_dang": "Minju-dang", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_sahoe_daejung_dang": "Sahoe Daejung-dang", "votes_tongil_dang": "Tongil-dang"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 233, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 233, "cast_gt_registered": 233}, "n_stations_flagged": 233, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:07:44.462255", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 233}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cc613a1bede7493b902acb21161efd2e", "name": "Korea 1958 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 233)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 1958, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Korea lower-house election 1958 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (233 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_daehan_bangong_cheongnyeon_hoe": "Daehan Bangong Cheongnyeon-hoe", "votes_daehan_bangong_dan": "Daehan Bangong-dan", "votes_dongnip_nonong_dang": "Dongnip Nonong-dang", "votes_gungmin_dang": "Gungmin-dang", "votes_gungmin_hoe": "Gungmin-hoe", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jayu_dang": "Jayu-dang", "votes_minju_hyuksin_dang": "Minju Hyuksin-dang", "votes_minju_dang": "Minju-dang", "votes_nongmin_hoe": "Nongmin-hoe", "votes_nonong_dang": "Nonong-dang", "votes_tongil_dang": "Tongil-dang"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 233, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 233, "cast_gt_registered": 223}, "n_stations_flagged": 233, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:07:28.070369", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 233}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ee12979411674d7abfdc25c3cce64278", "name": "Korea 1954 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 203)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 1954, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Korea lower-house election 1954 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (203 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_990": "-990", "votes_bulgyo": "Bulgyo", "votes_daehan_gungmin_dang": "Daehan Gungmin-dang", "votes_daehan_nodong_chongyeonmaeng": "Daehan Nodong Chongyeonmaeng", "votes_dongnip_nonong_dang": "Dongnip Nonong-dang", "votes_eomin_hoe": "Eomin-hoe", "votes_gungmin_hoe": "Gungmin-hoe", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jayu_dang": "Jayu-dang", "votes_jeheon_gukhoe_uiwon_dongji_hoe": "Jeheon Gukhoe Uiwon Dongji-hoe", "votes_joseon_minju_dang": "Joseon Minju-dang", "votes_minju_gungmin_dang": "Minju Gungmin-dang", "votes_minjung_jagyul_dan": "Minjung Jagyul-dan", "votes_nongmin_hoe": "Nongmin-hoe", "votes_yeoja_gungmin_dang": "Yeoja Gungmin-dang", "votes_yudo_hoe": "Yudo-hoe"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 203, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 202, "registered_not_positive": 203}, "n_stations_flagged": 203, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:07:20.771568", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 203}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "53f4344f11474af3ab261ee654cce8d8", "name": "Korea 1950 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 210)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 1950, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Korea lower-house election 1950 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (210 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_aeguk_danche_yeonmaeng": "Aeguk Danche Yeonmaeng", "votes_bulgyo": "Bulgyo", "votes_chundokyo": "Chundokyo", "votes_daehan_buin_hoe": "Daehan Buin-hoe", "votes_daehan_cheongnyeon_dan": "Daehan Cheongnyeon-dan", "votes_daehan_gungmin_dang": "Daehan Gungmin-dang", "votes_daehan_nodong_chongyeonmaeng": "Daehan Nodong Chongyeonmaeng", "votes_daehan_nongmin_chongyeonmaeng": "Daehan Nongmin Chongyeonmaeng", "votes_daehan_nonong_dang": "Daehan Nonong-dang", "votes_daehan_uiyeol_dan": "Daehan Uiyeol-dan", "votes_dongno_dang": "Dongno-dang", "votes_gungmin_hoe": "Gungmin-hoe", "votes_hanguk_dongnip_dang": "Hanguk Dongnip-dang", "votes_ilmin_gurakbu": "Ilmin Gurakbu", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jaeil_dongpo_georyou_mindan": "Jaeil Dongpo Georyou Mindan", "votes_jeonggyung_yeongu_hoe": "Jeonggyung Yeongu-hoe", "votes_joseon_minju_dang": "Joseon Minju-dang", "votes_minjok_jaju_yeonmaeng": "Minjok Jaju-yeonmaeng", "votes_minju_gungmin_dang": "Minju Gungmin-dang", "votes_nongmin_hoe": "Nongmin-hoe", "votes_nonong_cheongnyeon_yeonmaeng": "Nonong Cheongnyeon-yeonmaeng", "votes_sahoe_dang": "Sahoe-dang", "votes_seonryang_dongji_hoe": "Seonryang Dongji-hoe", "votes_singang_hoe": "Singang-hoe", "votes_sinmungija_hyeophoe": "Sinmungija Hyeophoe", "votes_sinsaeng_hoe": "Sinsaeng-hoe", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_yeoja_gungmin_dang": "Yeoja Gungmin-dang", "votes_yudo_hoe": "Yudo-hoe", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 210, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 210, "cast_gt_registered": 192}, "n_stations_flagged": 210, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:07:19.271823", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 210}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "92e10c691a6244159b59a1548761e507", "name": "Korea 1948 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 200)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 1948, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Korea lower-house election 1948 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (200 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_aeguk_buindongji_hoe": "Aeguk Buindongji-hoe", "votes_busan_15_gurakbu": "Busan 15 Gurakbu", "votes_daedong_cheongnyeon_dan": "Daedong Cheongnyeon-dan", "votes_daehan_dongnip_cheongnyeon_dan": "Daehan Dongnip Cheongnyeon-dan", "votes_daehan_dongnip_chokseong_aegukbuin_h": "Daehan Dongnip Chokseong Aegukbuin-hoe", "votes_daehan_dongnip_chokseong_gungmin_hoe": "Daehan Dongnip Chokseong Gungmin-hoe", "votes_daehan_dongnip_chokseong_nongmin_cho": "Daehan Dongnip Chokseong Nongmin Chongyeonmaeng", "votes_daehan_dongnip_seobuk_hyeophoe": "Daehan Dongnip Seobuk-hyeophoe", "votes_daehan_nodong_chongyeonmaeng": "Daehan Nodong Chongyeonmaeng", "votes_daehanminguk_chongdongwon_bonbu": "Daehanminguk Chongdongwon-bonbu", "votes_daeseong_ghoe": "Daeseong-ghoe", "votes_danmin_dang": "Danmin-dang", "votes_gidokgyodo_yeonmaeng": "Gidokgyodo-yeonmaeng", "votes_gyoyuk_hyeophoe": "Gyoyuk-hyeophoe", "votes_hanguk_dongnip_dang": "Hanguk Dongnip-dang", "votes_hanguk_minju_dang": "Hanguk Minju-dang", "votes_ijaemin_dongpo_jachi_hoe": "Ijaemin Dongpo Jachi-hoe", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jeondo_hoe": "Jeondo-hoe", "votes_joseon_bulkyo_jungang_chongmuwon": "Joseon Bulkyo Jungang Chongmuwon", "votes_joseon_byeonhosa_hyeophoe": "Joseon Byeonhosa Hyeophoe", "votes_joseon_chungwoo_dang": "Joseon Chungwoo-dang", "votes_joseon_gonghwa_dang": "Joseon Gonghwa-dang", "votes_joseon_minjok_cheongnyeon_dan": "Joseon Minjok Cheongnyeon-dan", "votes_joseon_minju_dang": "Joseon Minju-dang", "votes_minjok_saehoe_dang": "Minjok Saehoe-dang", "votes_minjok_tongil_bonbu": "Minjok Tongil-bonbu", "votes_minju_uiwon": "Minju Uiwon", "votes_minjung_dang": "Minjung-dang", "votes_yudo_hoe": "Yudo-hoe", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 200, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 187, "registered_not_positive": 200}, "n_stations_flagged": 200, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:07:16.020189", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 200}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c75e04d6f7674465bb76dea3545194c1", "name": "Kenya 2013 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 290)", "metadata": {"country": "Kenya", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Kenya lower-house election 2013, CONSTITUENCY level (290 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_agano_party": "Agano Party", "votes_alliance_party_of_kenya": "Alliance Party of Kenya", "votes_chama_cha_uzalendo": "Chama Cha Uzalendo", "votes_democratic_party_of_kenya": "Democratic Party of Kenya", "votes_federal_party_of_kenya": "Federal Party of Kenya", "votes_grand_national_union": "Grand National Union", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_kenya_african_national_union": "Kenya African National Union", "votes_kenya_national_congress": "Kenya National Congress", "votes_maendeleo_democratic_party": "Maendeleo Democratic Party", "votes_mazingira_greens_party_of_kenya": "Mazingira Greens Party of Kenya", "votes_muungano_party": "Muungano Party", "votes_national_agenda_party_of_kenya": "National Agenda Party of Kenya", "votes_national_rainbow_coalition_narc": "National Rainbow Coalition (Narc)", "votes_national_rainbow_coalition_kenya_nar": "National Rainbow Coalition-Kenya (Narc-K)", "votes_national_vision_party": "National Vision Party", "votes_new_forum_for_restoration_of_democra": "New forum for Restoration of Democracy-Kenya", "votes_orange_democratic_movement": "Orange Democratic Movement", "votes_party_of_independent_candidates_of_k": "Party of Independent Candidates of Kenya", "votes_peoples_democratic_party": "Peoples Democratic Party", "votes_restore_and_build_kenya": "Restore And Build Kenya", "votes_saba_saba_asili": "Saba Saba Asili", "votes_the_independent_party": "The Independent Party", "votes_the_national_alliance": "The National Alliance", "votes_united_democratic_movement": "United Democratic Movement", "votes_united_democratic_forum_party": "United Democratic forum Party", "votes_united_republican_party": "United Republican Party", "votes_wiper_democratic_movement_kenya": "Wiper Democratic Movement - Kenya", "votes_forum_for_restoration_of_democracy_k": "forum for Restoration of Democracy-Kenya", "votes_forum_for_restoration_of_democracy_p": "forum for Restoration of Democracy-People", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 290, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 2, "registered_not_positive": 290, "cast_gt_registered": 290}, "n_stations_flagged": 290, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:07:14.222560", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.408, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.307, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.524, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.413, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.408, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.307, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.432, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.358, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.476, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.629, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.657, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.524, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.413, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.324, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.324, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.701, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.604, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.604, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Jubilee Alliance/TNA", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Coalition for Reforms and Democracy/ODM", "margin": 6.94, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "KEN", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 290}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4f119ad043ed40f9805055dd4e16baa0", "name": "Kenya 1997 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 210)", "metadata": {"country": "Kenya", "year": 1997, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Kenya lower-house election 1997 (December), CONSTITUENCY level (210 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democratic_assistance_party": "Democratic Assistance Party", "votes_democratic_party": "Democratic Party", "votes_economic_independence_party": "Economic Independence Party", "votes_forum_for_the_restoration_of_democra": "Forum For The Restoration Of Democracy-Asili", "votes_forum_for_the_restoration__2": "Forum For The Restoration Of Democracy-Kenya", "votes_forum_for_the_restoration__3": "Forum For The Restoration Of Democracy-People", "votes_kenya_african_national_union": "Kenya African National Union", "votes_kenya_national_congress": "Kenya National Congress", "votes_kenya_national_democratic_alliance": "Kenya National Democratic Alliance", "votes_kenya_social_congress": "Kenya Social Congress", "votes_labour_party_of_democracy": "Labour Party Of Democracy", "votes_liberal_party_of_kenya": "Liberal Party Of Kenya", "votes_national_democratic_party": "National Democratic Party", "votes_party_of_independent_candidates_of_k": "Party Of Independent Candidates Of Kenya", "votes_safina": "Safina", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party", "votes_united_patriotic_party_of_kenya": "United Patriotic Party Of Kenya"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 210, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:07:12.747755", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.315, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.273, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.336, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.209, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.315, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.273, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.568, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.495, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.445, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.361, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.753, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.188, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.325, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.644, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.161, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.336, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.336, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.209, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.209, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.208, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.208, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.44, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.393, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.393, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "KANU", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Democratic Party", "margin": 11.6, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "KEN", "year": 1997, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 210}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2193bf50d01b4ed2a9a961bccf3393fe", "name": "Kenya 1992 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 171)", "metadata": {"country": "Kenya", "year": 1992, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Kenya lower-house election 1992 (December), CONSTITUENCY level (171 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democratic_party": "Democratic Party", "votes_forum_for_the_restoration_of_democra": "Forum For The Restoration Of Democracy-Asili", "votes_forum_for_the_restoration__2": "Forum For The Restoration Of Democracy-Kenya", "votes_kenya_african_national_union": "Kenya African National Union", "votes_kenya_national_congress": "Kenya National Congress", "votes_kenya_national_democratic_alliance": "Kenya National Democratic Alliance", "votes_kenya_social_congress": "Kenya Social Congress", "votes_party_of_independent_candidates_of_k": "Party Of Independent Candidates Of Kenya", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 171, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 171, "cast_gt_registered": 171}, "n_stations_flagged": 171, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:07:11.309045", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.188, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.87, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.291, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.186, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.188, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.547, "year": 1992, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.468, "year": 1992, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.473, "year": 1992, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.171, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.753, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.188, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.325, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1992, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.623, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.156, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.291, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.291, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.186, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.189, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.189, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.38, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.38, "year": 1992, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.393, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.393, "year": 1992, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 1992, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "KANU", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Ford-Asili", "margin": 12.64, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "KEN", "year": 1992, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 171}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2e41101643bd4ac0b486b76c267ead62", "name": "Japan 1993 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 129)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 1993, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan lower-house election 1993 (July), CONSTITUENCY level (129 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_dsp_affiliated_independent": "DSP affiliated independent", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jnp_affiliated_independent": "JNP affiliated independent", "votes_jsp_affiliated_independent": "JSP affiliated independent", "votes_jiy_minshu_t": "Jiy\u00fb Minshu T\u00f4", "votes_koumei_affiliated_independent": "Koumei affiliated independent", "votes_k_mei_t": "K\u00f4mei T\u00f4", "votes_ldp_affiliated_independent": "LDP affiliated independent", "votes_minshu_shakai_t": "Minshu Shakai T\u00f4", "votes_nihon_ky_san_t": "Nihon Ky\u00f4san T\u00f4", "votes_nihon_shakai_t": "Nihon Shakai T\u00f4", "votes_nihon_shint": "Nihon Shint\u00f4", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_shakai_minshu_reng": "Shakai Minshu Reng\u00f4", "votes_shinsei_t": "Shinsei T\u00f4", "votes_shint_sakigake": "Shint\u00f4 Sakigake", "votes_usdp_affiliated_independent": "USDP affiliated independent"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 129, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 119}, "n_stations_flagged": 119, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:07:09.804710", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.799, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.898, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.837, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.755, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.799, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.898, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.702, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.998, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.499, "year": 1993, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.755, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.754, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.115, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.115, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 129}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "86c0008a871c4e2eb861899d76e2a6d2", "name": "Japan 1990 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 130)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 1990, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan lower-house election 1990 (February), CONSTITUENCY level (130 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_dsp_affiliated_independent": "DSP affiliated independent", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jsp_affiliated_independent": "JSP affiliated independent", "votes_jiy_minshu_t": "Jiy\u00fb Minshu T\u00f4", "votes_koumei_affiliated_independent": "Koumei affiliated independent", "votes_k_mei_t": "K\u00f4mei T\u00f4", "votes_ldp_affiliated_independent": "LDP affiliated independent", "votes_minshu_shakai_t": "Minshu Shakai T\u00f4", "votes_nihon_ky_san_t": "Nihon Ky\u00f4san T\u00f4", "votes_nihon_shakai_t": "Nihon Shakai T\u00f4", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_progressive_party": "Progressive Party", "votes_shakai_minshu_reng": "Shakai Minshu Reng\u00f4", "votes_usdp_affiliated_independent": "USDP affiliated independent"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 130, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 124}, "n_stations_flagged": 124, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:07:08.452812", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.808, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.898, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.835, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.754, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.808, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.898, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.704, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 1990, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.003, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.501, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 1990, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.754, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 1990, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.753, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.753, "year": 1990, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.115, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.115, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 130}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "604945af6faa49b8a5812207ad5ce878", "name": "Japan 1986 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 130)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 1986, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan lower-house election 1986 (July), CONSTITUENCY level (130 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_dsp_affiliated_independent": "DSP affiliated independent", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jcp_affiliated_independent": "JCP affiliated independent", "votes_jsp_affiliated_independent": "JSP affiliated independent", "votes_jiy_minshu_t": "Jiy\u00fb Minshu T\u00f4", "votes_koumei_affiliated_independent": "Koumei affiliated independent", "votes_k_mei_t": "K\u00f4mei T\u00f4", "votes_ldp_affiliated_independent": "LDP affiliated independent", "votes_minshu_shakai_t": "Minshu Shakai T\u00f4", "votes_nihon_ky_san_t": "Nihon Ky\u00f4san T\u00f4", "votes_nihon_shakai_t": "Nihon Shakai T\u00f4", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_shakai_minshu_reng": "Shakai Minshu Reng\u00f4", "votes_shin_jiy_t": "Shin Jiy\u00fb T\u00f4"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 130, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 116}, "n_stations_flagged": 116, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:07:07.188842", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.811, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.904, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.836, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.752, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 1986, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.007, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.502, "year": 1986, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 1986, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 1986, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.753, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.753, "year": 1986, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.939, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.115, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.115, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.921, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 130}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c5da20db42174d908a498bba76eee2fa", "name": "Japan 1983 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 130)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 1983, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan lower-house election 1983 (December), CONSTITUENCY level (130 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_dsp_affiliated_independent": "DSP affiliated independent", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jcp_affiliated_independent": "JCP affiliated independent", "votes_jsp_affiliated_independent": "JSP affiliated independent", "votes_jiy_minshu_t": "Jiy\u00fb Minshu T\u00f4", "votes_koumei_affiliated_independent": "Koumei affiliated independent", "votes_k_mei_t": "K\u00f4mei T\u00f4", "votes_ldp_affiliated_independent": "LDP affiliated independent", "votes_minshu_shakai_t": "Minshu Shakai T\u00f4", "votes_nlc_affiliated_independent": "NLC affiliated independent", "votes_nihon_ky_san_t": "Nihon Ky\u00f4san T\u00f4", "votes_nihon_shakai_t": "Nihon Shakai T\u00f4", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_shakai_minshu_reng": "Shakai Minshu Reng\u00f4", "votes_shin_jiy_t": "Shin Jiy\u00fb T\u00f4"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 130, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 115}, "n_stations_flagged": 115, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:07:01.881411", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.899, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.836, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.752, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.006, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.501, "year": 1983, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.115, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.115, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 130}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b7f8c4b97bc744c3893fd2a2d05f43d1", "name": "Japan 1980 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 130)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 1980, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan lower-house election 1980 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (130 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_dsp_affiliated_independent": "DSP affiliated independent", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jcp_affiliated_independent": "JCP affiliated independent", "votes_jsp_affiliated_independent": "JSP affiliated independent", "votes_jiy_minshu_t": "Jiy\u00fb Minshu T\u00f4", "votes_koumei_affiliated_independent": "Koumei affiliated independent", "votes_k_mei_t": "K\u00f4mei T\u00f4", "votes_ldp_affiliated_independent": "LDP affiliated independent", "votes_minshu_shakai_t": "Minshu Shakai T\u00f4", "votes_nlc_affiliated_independent": "NLC affiliated independent", "votes_nihon_ky_san_t": "Nihon Ky\u00f4san T\u00f4", "votes_nihon_shakai_t": "Nihon Shakai T\u00f4", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_shakai_minshu_reng": "Shakai Minshu Reng\u00f4", "votes_shin_jiy_t": "Shin Jiy\u00fb T\u00f4"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 130, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 117}, "n_stations_flagged": 117, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:07:00.803897", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.811, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.898, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.835, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.752, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.898, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.997, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.499, "year": 1980, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.123, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.123, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 130}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "befb6f91f05e4ccf831878869718f2c8", "name": "Japan 1979 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 130)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 1979, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan lower-house election 1979 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (130 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_dsp_affiliated_independent": "DSP affiliated independent", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jcp_affiliated_independent": "JCP affiliated independent", "votes_jsp_affiliated_independent": "JSP affiliated independent", "votes_jiy_minshu_t": "Jiy\u00fb Minshu T\u00f4", "votes_koumei_affiliated_independent": "Koumei affiliated independent", "votes_k_mei_t": "K\u00f4mei T\u00f4", "votes_ldp_affiliated_independent": "LDP affiliated independent", "votes_minshu_shakai_t": "Minshu Shakai T\u00f4", "votes_nlc_affiliated_independent": "NLC affiliated independent", "votes_nihon_ky_san_t": "Nihon Ky\u00f4san T\u00f4", "votes_nihon_shakai_t": "Nihon Shakai T\u00f4", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_shakai_minshu_reng": "Shakai Minshu Reng\u00f4", "votes_shin_jiy_t": "Shin Jiy\u00fb T\u00f4", "votes_usdp_affiliated_independent": "USDP affiliated independent"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 130, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 121}, "n_stations_flagged": 121, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:06:59.692001", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.811, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.898, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.752, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.898, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 1979, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.997, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.499, "year": 1979, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 1979, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 1979, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 1979, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.939, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.115, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.115, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 130}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f7ff0f53a5474b688ad75c8e5f234dbb", "name": "Japan 1976 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 130)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 1976, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan lower-house election 1976 (December), CONSTITUENCY level (130 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_dsp_affiliated_independent": "DSP affiliated independent", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jcp_affiliated_independent": "JCP affiliated independent", "votes_jsp_affiliated_independent": "JSP affiliated independent", "votes_jiy_minshu_t": "Jiy\u00fb Minshu T\u00f4", "votes_koumei_affiliated_independent": "Koumei affiliated independent", "votes_k_mei_t": "K\u00f4mei T\u00f4", "votes_ldp_affiliated_independent": "LDP affiliated independent", "votes_minshu_shakai_t": "Minshu Shakai T\u00f4", "votes_nlc_affiliated_independent": "NLC affiliated independent", "votes_nihon_ky_san_t": "Nihon Ky\u00f4san T\u00f4", "votes_nihon_shakai_t": "Nihon Shakai T\u00f4", "votes_shin_jiy_t": "Shin Jiy\u00fb T\u00f4", "votes_usdp_affiliated_independent": "USDP affiliated independent"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 130, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 120}, "n_stations_flagged": 120, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:06:58.520530", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.812, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.901, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.749, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.812, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.901, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.7, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.998, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.499, "year": 1976, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.747, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.747, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.939, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.115, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.115, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 130}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "316bdbf720c04144a89541254cd58d35", "name": "Japan 1949 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 117)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 1949, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan lower-house election 1949 (January), CONSTITUENCY level (117 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_farmer_labour_party": "Farmer-Labour Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jcp_affiliated_independent": "JCP affiliated independent", "votes_japan_farmers_party": "Japan Farmers\u0092 Party", "votes_kokumin_ky_d_t": "Kokumin Ky\u00f4d\u00f4 T\u00f4", "votes_minshu_jiy_t": "Minshu Jiy\u00fb T\u00f4", "votes_minshu_t": "Minshu T\u00f4", "votes_new_farmers_party": "New Farmers\u0092 Party", "votes_new_liberal_party": "New Liberal Party", "votes_nihon_ky_san_t": "Nihon Ky\u00f4san T\u00f4", "votes_nihon_shakai_t": "Nihon Shakai T\u00f4", "votes_progressive_socialist_party": "Progressive Socialist Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 117, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 115}, "n_stations_flagged": 115, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:06:57.564815", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.809, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.902, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.372, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.364, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.342, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 1949, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.785, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 1949, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.961, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.49, "year": 1949, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.372, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 1949, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.364, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.364, "year": 1949, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.354, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.354, "year": 1949, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.809, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 1949, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 1949, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "267aec55643c4c82a8b2b395e0eb8a7d", "name": "Japan 1947 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 117)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 1947, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan lower-house election 1947 (April), CONSTITUENCY level (117 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jcp_affiliated_independent": "JCP affiliated independent", "votes_kokumin_ky_d_t": "Kokumin Ky\u00f4d\u00f4 T\u00f4", "votes_ldp_affiliated_independent": "LDP affiliated independent", "votes_minshu_t": "Minshu T\u00f4", "votes_nihon_jiy_t": "Nihon Jiy\u00fb T\u00f4", "votes_nihon_ky_san_t": "Nihon Ky\u00f4san T\u00f4", "votes_nihon_shakai_t": "Nihon Shakai T\u00f4", "votes_others": "Others"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 117, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 117}, "n_stations_flagged": 117, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:06:56.564772", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.808, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.9, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.37, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.354, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.808, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1947, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.9, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1947, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1947, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.352, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 1947, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 1947, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 1947, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.976, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.494, "year": 1947, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.37, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 1947, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.354, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.354, "year": 1947, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.351, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 1947, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 1947, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.816, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 1947, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.155, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.155, "year": 1947, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.797, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 1947, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 117}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "841465e5215b417d9ed0b7b4d44c80d3", "name": "Italy 1996 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 501)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 1996, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Italy lower-house election 1996 (April), CONSTITUENCY level (501 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alleanza_nazionale": "Alleanza nazionale", "votes_ccd_cdu": "CCD + CDU", "votes_forza_italia": "Forza Italia", "votes_l_ulivo": "L'Ulivo", "votes_lega_nord": "Lega Nord", "votes_lega_d_azione_meridionale": "Lega d'azione meridionale", "votes_lista_dini_rinnovamento_italiano": "Lista Dini-Rinnovamento italiano", "votes_lista_pannella_sgarbi": "Lista Pannella-Sgarbi", "votes_movimento_sociale_tricolore": "Movimento sociale tricolore", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_ppi_svp_pri_ud_prodi": "PPI + SVP + PRI + UD + Prodi", "votes_partito_della_rifondazione_comunista": "Partito della rifondazione comunista", "votes_partito_democratico_della_sinistra": "Partito democratico della sinistra", "votes_partito_sardo_d_azione": "Partito sardo d'azione", "votes_polo_per_le_libert": "Polo per le libert\u00e0", "votes_union_valdotaine": "Union valdotaine", "votes_verdi": "Verdi"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 501, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:06:54.388420", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.823, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.884, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.835, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.75, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.823, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.884, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.208, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.694, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.764, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.935, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.245, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.245, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 501}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c4ea4f711dcd45afa078b0d94d4b8736", "name": "Italy 1994 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 501)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 1994, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Italy lower-house election 1994 (March), CONSTITUENCY level (501 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alleanza_nazionale": "Alleanza nazionale", "votes_centro_cristiano_democratico": "Centro cristiano democratico", "votes_forza_italia": "Forza Italia", "votes_la_rete_movimento_democratico": "La rete-Movimento democratico", "votes_lega_nord": "Lega Nord", "votes_lista_pannella": "Lista Pannella", "votes_lista_valle_d_aosta": "Lista Valle d'Aosta", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_partito_della_rifondazione_comunista": "Partito della rifondazione comunista", "votes_partito_democratico_della_sinistra": "Partito democratico della sinistra", "votes_partito_popolare_italiano": "Partito popolare italiano", "votes_partito_socialista_italiano": "Partito socialista italiano", "votes_patto_segni": "Patto Segni", "votes_patto_per_l_italia_ppi_patto_segni": "Patto per l'Italia (PPI,Patto Segni)", "votes_polo_del_buon_governo": "Polo del buon governo", "votes_polo_delle_libert": "Polo delle libert\u00e0", "votes_progressisti": "Progressisti", "votes_verdi": "Verdi"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 501, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:06:51.879695", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.538, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.883, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.83, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.743, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.205, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.694, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.761, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.69, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.743, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.935, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 501}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dc7b6fa6987742e59b5b9536ed46bc03", "name": "India 2004 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 540)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "India lower-house election 2004 (April), CONSTITUENCY level (540 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_india_anna_dravida_munnetra_kazh": "All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "votes_all_india_forward_bloc": "All India Forward Bloc", "votes_all_india_trinamool_congress": "All India Trinamool Congress", "votes_apna_dal": "Apna Dal", "votes_asom_gana_parishad": "Asom Gana Parishad", "votes_bahujan_samaj_party": "Bahujan Samaj Party", "votes_bharatiya_janata_party": "Bharatiya Janata Party", "votes_biju_janata_dal": "Biju Janata Dal", "votes_communist_party_of_india": "Communist Party Of India", "votes_communist_party_of_india_marxist": "Communist Party Of India (Marxist)", "votes_communist_party_of_india_marxist_len": "Communist Party Of India (Marxist-Leninist) (Liberation)", "votes_dravida_munnetra_kazhagam": "Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_indian_national_congress": "Indian National Congress", "votes_indian_national_lok_dal": "Indian National Lok Dal", "votes_janata_dal_secular": "Janata Dal (Secular)", "votes_janata_dal_united": "Janata Dal (United)", "votes_jharkhand_mukti_morcha": "Jharkhand Mukti Morcha", "votes_lok_jan_shakti_party": "Lok Jan Shakti Party", "votes_marumalarchi_dravida_munnetra_kazhag": "Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "votes_nationalist_congress_party": "Nationalist Congress Party", "votes_pattali_makkal_katchi": "Pattali Makkal Katchi", "votes_rashtriya_janata_dal": "Rashtriya Janata Dal", "votes_rashtriya_lok_dal": "Rashtriya Lok Dal", "votes_revolutionary_socialist_party": "Revolutionary Socialist Party", "votes_samajwadi_party": "Samajwadi Party", "votes_shiromani_akali_dal": "Shiromani Akali Dal", "votes_shivsena": "Shivsena", "votes_telangana_rashtra_samithi": "Telangana Rashtra Samithi", "votes_telugu_desam": "Telugu Desam", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 540, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 533}, "n_stations_flagged": 533, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:06:46.946669", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.768, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.854, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.731, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.578, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.111, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.731, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.731, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.578, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.578, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.735, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 540}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "441a77053b214229bd49743fd1e65900", "name": "India 1999 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 540)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 1999, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "India lower-house election 1999 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (540 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_india_anna_dravida_munnetra_kazh": "All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "votes_all_india_forward_bloc": "All India Forward Bloc", "votes_all_india_trinamool_congress": "All India Trinamool Congress", "votes_apna_dal": "Apna Dal", "votes_asom_gana_parishad": "Asom Gana Parishad", "votes_bahujan_samaj_party": "Bahujan Samaj Party", "votes_bharatiya_janata_party": "Bharatiya Janata Party", "votes_biju_janata_dal": "Biju Janata Dal", "votes_communist_party_of_india": "Communist Party Of India", "votes_communist_party_of_india_marxist": "Communist Party Of India (Marxist)", "votes_communist_party_of_india_marxist_len": "Communist Party Of India (Marxist-Lenninist) (Liberation)", "votes_dravida_munnetra_kazhagam": "Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_indian_national_congress": "Indian National Congress", "votes_indian_national_lok_dal": "Indian National Lok Dal", "votes_janata_dal_secular": "Janata Dal (Secular)", "votes_janata_dal_united": "Janata Dal (United)", "votes_jharkhand_mukti_morcha": "Jharkhand Mukti Morcha", "votes_marumalarchi_dravida_munnetra_kazhag": "Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "votes_muslim_league_kerala_state_committee": "Muslim League Kerala State Committee", "votes_nationalist_congress_party": "Nationalist Congress Party", "votes_pattali_makkal_katchi": "Pattali Makkal Katchi", "votes_rashtriya_janata_dal": "Rashtriya Janata Dal", "votes_rashtriya_lok_dal": "Rashtriya Lok Dal", "votes_revolutionary_socialist_party": "Revolutionary Socialist Party", "votes_samajwadi_party": "Samajwadi Party", "votes_shiromani_akali_dal": "Shiromani Akali Dal", "votes_shivsena": "Shivsena", "votes_tamil_maanila_congress_moopanar": "Tamil Maanila Congress (Moopanar)", "votes_telugu_desam": "Telugu Desam", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 540, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:06:42.358767", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.76, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.847, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.737, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.586, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.082, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.117, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.029, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.586, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.586, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.491, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.491, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.754, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 540}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "be792c5990c14e41ba7ad35e2cd4a3b2", "name": "India 1998 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 540)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 1998, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "India lower-house election 1998 (March), CONSTITUENCY level (540 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_india_anna_dravida_munnetra_kazh": "All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "votes_all_india_forward_bloc": "All India Forward Bloc", "votes_all_india_rashtriya_janata_party": "All India Rashtriya Janata Party", "votes_asom_gana_parishad": "Asom Gana Parishad", "votes_bahujan_samaj_party": "Bahujan Samaj Party", "votes_bharatiya_janata_party": "Bharatiya Janata Party", "votes_biju_janata_dal": "Biju Janata Dal", "votes_communist_party_of_india": "Communist Party Of India", "votes_communist_party_of_india_marxist": "Communist Party Of India (Marxist)", "votes_communist_party_of_india_marxist_len": "Communist Party Of India (Marxist-Lenninist)(Liberation)", "votes_dravida_munnetra_kazhagam": "Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "votes_haryana_lok_dal_rastriya": "Haryana Lok Dal (Rastriya)", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_indian_national_congress": "Indian National Congress", "votes_janata_dal": "Janata Dal", "votes_jharkhand_mukti_morcha": "Jharkhand Mukti Morcha", "votes_lok_shakti": "Lok Shakti", "votes_marumalarchi_dravida_munnetra_kazhag": "Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "votes_pattali_makkal_katchi": "Pattali Makkal Katchi", "votes_rashtriya_janata_dal": "Rashtriya Janata Dal", "votes_republican_party_of_india": "Republican Party Of India", "votes_revolutionary_socialist_party": "Revolutionary Socialist Party", "votes_samajwadi_janata_party_rashtriya": "Samajwadi Janata Party (Rashtriya)", "votes_samajwadi_party": "Samajwadi Party", "votes_samata_party": "Samata Party", "votes_shiromani_akali_dal": "Shiromani Akali Dal", "votes_shivsena": "Shivsena", "votes_tamil_maanila_congress_moopanar": "Tamil Maanila Congress (Moopanar)", "votes_telugu_desam_party": "Telugu Desam Party", "votes_west_bengal_trinamool_congress": "West Bengal Trinamool Congress", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 540, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:06:35.261607", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.76, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.844, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.746, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.593, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.075, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.111, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.746, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.593, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.593, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.499, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.499, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.753, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.753, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 540}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f91fd2c82d574a8eae5be8504315f466", "name": "India 1996 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 540)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 1996, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "India lower-house election 1996 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (540 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_india_anna_dravida_munnetra_kazh": "All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "votes_all_india_forward_bloc": "All India Forward Bloc", "votes_all_india_indira_congress_tiwari": "All India Indira Congress (Tiwari)", "votes_asom_gana_parishad": "Asom Gana Parishad", "votes_bahujan_samaj_party": "Bahujan Samaj Party", "votes_bharatiya_janata_party": "Bharatiya Janata Party", "votes_communist_party_of_india": "Communist Party Of India", "votes_communist_party_of_india_marxist": "Communist Party Of India (Marxist)", "votes_communist_party_of_india_marxist_len": "Communist Party Of India (Marxist-Leninist) (Liberation)", "votes_dravida_munnetra_kazhagam": "Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "votes_haryana_vikas_party": "Haryana Vikas Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_indian_national_congress": "Indian National Congress", "votes_janata_dal": "Janata Dal", "votes_janata_party": "Janata Party", "votes_jharkhand_mukti_morcha": "Jharkhand Mukti Morcha", "votes_karnataka_congress_party": "Karnataka Congress Party", "votes_marumalarchi_dravida_munnetra_kazhag": "Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "votes_muslim_league": "Muslim League", "votes_ntr_telugu_desam_party_lakshmi_parva": "Ntr Telugu Desam Party (Lakshmi Parvathi)", "votes_pattali_makkal_katchi": "Pattali Makkal Katchi", "votes_peasants_and_workers_party_of_india": "Peasants And Workers Party Of India", "votes_republican_party_of_india": "Republican Party Of India", "votes_revolutionary_socialist_party": "Revolutionary Socialist Party", "votes_samajwadi_party": "Samajwadi Party", "votes_samata_party": "Samata Party", "votes_shiromani_akali_dal": "Shiromani Akali Dal", "votes_shivsena": "Shivsena", "votes_tamil_maanila_congress_moopanar": "Tamil Maanila Congress (Moopanar)", "votes_telugu_desam_party": "Telugu Desam Party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 540, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:06:29.290246", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.761, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.848, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.741, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.588, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.761, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.082, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.113, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.741, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 1996, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 1996, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 540}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "461cd9cafe434041acfbfb199491f728", "name": "India 1989 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 526)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 1989, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "India lower-house election 1989 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (526 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_india_anna_dravida_munnetra_kazh": "All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "votes_all_india_forward_block": "All India Forward Block", "votes_allindia_majlis_e_ithehad_ul_mulimee": "Allindia Majlis-E Ithehad-Ul-Mulimeen", "votes_bahujan_samaj_party": "Bahujan Samaj Party", "votes_bharatiya_janata_party": "Bharatiya Janata Party", "votes_bharatiya_republican_paksha": "Bharatiya Republican Paksha", "votes_communist_party_of_india": "Communist Party Of India", "votes_communist_party_of_india_marxist": "Communist Party Of India (Marxist)", "votes_doordarshi_party": "Doordarshi Party", "votes_dravida_munnetra_kazhagam": "Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "votes_gorkha_national_liberation_front": "Gorkha National Liberation Front", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_indian_congress_socialist_sarat_chan": "Indian Congress (Socialist- Sarat Chandra Sinha)", "votes_indian_national_congress": "Indian National Congress", "votes_indian_peoples_front": "Indian Peoples Front", "votes_janata_dal": "Janata Dal", "votes_janata_pary_jp": "Janata Pary (Jp)", "votes_jharkhand_dal": "Jharkhand Dal", "votes_jharkhand_mukti_morcha": "Jharkhand Mukti Morcha", "votes_karnataka_rajya_ryota_sangha": "Karnataka Rajya Ryota Sangha", "votes_kerala_congress_m": "Kerala Congress (M)", "votes_lok_dal_bahuguna": "Lok Dal (Bahuguna)", "votes_muslim_league": "Muslim League", "votes_pattali_makkal_katchi": "Pattali Makkal Katchi", "votes_peasants_and_workers_party_of_india": "Peasants And Workers Party Of India", "votes_republican_party_of_india_khobragade": "Republican Party Of India (Khobragade)", "votes_revolutionary_socialist_party": "Revolutionary Socialist Party", "votes_shiromani_akali_dal_badal": "Shiromani Akali Dal (Badal)", "votes_shiromani_akali_dal_simranjit_singh_": "Shiromani Akali Dal (Simranjit Singh Mann)", "votes_telugu_desam": "Telugu Desam", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 526, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:05:55.822282", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.763, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.848, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.665, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.517, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.549, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.637, "year": 1989, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.448, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 1989, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.109, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.027, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 1989, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.517, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 1989, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.44, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 1989, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 1989, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 1989, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.453, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.453, "year": 1989, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 526}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "56d1df7743b047d2b7c588d6b3515b6c", "name": "India 1984 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 512)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 1984, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "India lower-house election 1984 (December), CONSTITUENCY level (512 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_india_anna_dravida_munnetra_kazh": "All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "votes_all_india_forward_block": "All India Forward Block", "votes_all_india_muslim_league": "All India Muslim League", "votes_bharatiya_janta_party": "Bharatiya Janta Party", "votes_communist_party_of_india": "Communist Party Of India", "votes_communist_party_of_india_marxist": "Communist Party Of India (Marxist)", "votes_doordarshi_party": "Doordarshi Party", "votes_dravida_mummetra_kazhagam": "Dravida Mummetra Kazhagam", "votes_gandhi_kamraj_national_congress": "Gandhi Kamraj National Congress", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_indian_congress_j": "Indian Congress (J)", "votes_indian_congress_socialist": "Indian Congress (Socialist)", "votes_indian_national_congress": "Indian National Congress", "votes_jammu_kashmir_conference": "Jammu & Kashmir Conference", "votes_jammu_kashmir_panthers_party": "Jammu & Kashmir Panthers Party", "votes_janata_party": "Janata Party", "votes_jharkhand_mukti_morcha": "Jharkhand Mukti Morcha", "votes_kerala_congress": "Kerala Congress", "votes_kerala_congress_j": "Kerala Congress (J)", "votes_lok_dal": "Lok Dal", "votes_maharashtrawadi_gomantak": "Maharashtrawadi Gomantak", "votes_manipur_peoples_party": "Manipur Peoples Party", "votes_muslim_league": "Muslim League", "votes_naga_national_democratic_party": "Naga National Democratic Party", "votes_peasants_and_workers_party_of_india": "Peasants And Workers Party Of India", "votes_republican_party_of_india_khobragade": "Republican Party Of India (Khobragade)", "votes_revolutionary_socialist_party": "Revolutionary Socialist Party", "votes_socialist_unity_centre_of_india": "Socialist Unity Centre Of India", "votes_tamil_nadu_congress_k": "Tamil Nadu Congress (K)", "votes_telugu_desam": "Telugu Desam", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 512, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:05:48.617925", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.754, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.846, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.642, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.494, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.239, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.56, "year": 1984, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.448, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 1984, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.11, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.642, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.642, "year": 1984, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.494, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.494, "year": 1984, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.418, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.418, "year": 1984, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.679, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.679, "year": 1984, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 1984, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 1984, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 512}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "da8cb86c493e4cc2adceaef14ccfdc05", "name": "India 1980 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 526)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 1980, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "India lower-house election 1980 (January), CONSTITUENCY level (526 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_akhil_bharatiya_ramrajya_parishad": "Akhil Bharatiya Ramrajya Parishad", "votes_all_india_anna_dravida_munnetra_kazh": "All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "votes_all_india_forward_block": "All India Forward Block", "votes_all_india_muslim_league": "All India Muslim League", "votes_bharatiya_socialist_party": "Bharatiya Socialist Party", "votes_communist_party_of_india": "Communist Party Of India", "votes_communist_party_of_india_marxist": "Communist Party Of India (Marxist)", "votes_dravida_munnetra_kazhagam": "Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_indian_natioanl_congress_i": "Indian Natioanl Congress (I)", "votes_indian_national_congress_u": "Indian National Congress (U)", "votes_jammu_kashmir_national_conference": "Jammu & Kashmir National Conference", "votes_janta_party": "Janta Party", "votes_janta_party_secular": "Janta Party (Secular)", "votes_jharkhand_party": "Jharkhand Party", "votes_kerala_congress": "Kerala Congress", "votes_maharashtrawadi_gomantak": "Maharashtrawadi Gomantak", "votes_manipur_peoples_party": "Manipur Peoples Party", "votes_muslim_league": "Muslim League", "votes_peasants_and_workers_party": "Peasants And Workers Party", "votes_peoples_conference": "Peoples Conference", "votes_peoples_party_of_arunachal": "Peoples Party Of Arunachal", "votes_republican_party_of_india": "Republican Party Of India", "votes_republican_party_of_india_khobragade": "Republican Party Of India (Khobragade)", "votes_revolutionary_socialist_party": "Revolutionary Socialist Party", "votes_shiromani_akali_dal": "Shiromani Akali Dal", "votes_shiv_sena": "Shiv Sena", "votes_socialist_unity_centre_of_india": "Socialist Unity Centre Of India", "votes_tripura_upajati_juba_samiti": "Tripura Upajati Juba Samiti", "votes_united_democratic_front": "United Democratic Front", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 526, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:05:40.485456", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.297, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.847, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.646, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.503, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.297, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.55, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.637, "year": 1980, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.448, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.109, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.027, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 1980, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.503, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 1980, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.424, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 1980, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.702, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 1980, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 526}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2ada239ea209449dad940d66e71b6646", "name": "India 1977 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 539)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 1977, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "India lower-house election 1977 (March), CONSTITUENCY level (539 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_akhil_bharat_hindu_mahasabha": "Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha", "votes_all_india_anna_dravida_munnetra_kazh": "All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "votes_all_india_forward_bloc": "All India Forward Bloc", "votes_all_india_jharkhand_party": "All India Jharkhand Party", "votes_bharatiya_lok_dal": "Bharatiya Lok Dal", "votes_communist_party_of_india": "Communist Party Of India", "votes_communist_party_of_india_marxist": "Communist Party Of India (Marxist)", "votes_dravida_munnetra_kazhagam": "Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_indian_national_congress": "Indian National Congress", "votes_indian_national_congress_org": "Indian National Congress (Org)", "votes_jammu_kashmir_national_conference": "Jammu & Kashmir National Conference", "votes_jharkhand_party": "Jharkhand Party", "votes_kerala_congress": "Kerala Congress", "votes_kerala_congress_pillai_group": "Kerala Congress (Pillai Group)", "votes_maharashtrawadi_gomantak": "Maharashtrawadi Gomantak", "votes_manipur_peoples_party": "Manipur Peoples Party", "votes_muslim_league": "Muslim League", "votes_muslim_league_opposition": "Muslim League (Opposition)", "votes_peasants_workers_party": "Peasants & Workers Party", "votes_republican_party_of_india": "Republican Party Of India", "votes_republican_party_of_india_khobragade": "Republican Party Of India (Khobragade)", "votes_revolutionary_communist_party_of_ind": "Revolutionary Communist Party Of India", "votes_revolutionary_socialist_party": "Revolutionary Socialist Party", "votes_shiromani_akali_dal": "Shiromani Akali Dal", "votes_shoshit_samaj_dal_akhil_baharatiya": "Shoshit Samaj Dal (Akhil Baharatiya)", "votes_socialist_unity_centre_of_india": "Socialist Unity Centre Of India", "votes_tripura_upajiti_juba_samiti": "Tripura Upajiti Juba Samiti", "votes_united_democratic_front": "United Democratic Front", "votes_vishal_haryana": "Vishal Haryana", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 539, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:05:33.401220", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.312, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.845, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.494, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.345, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.312, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 1977, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 1977, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1977, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.508, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.627, "year": 1977, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.047, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1977, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 1977, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.118, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.029, "year": 1977, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.494, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.494, "year": 1977, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.345, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.345, "year": 1977, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.32, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.32, "year": 1977, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 1977, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.623, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 1977, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.359, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.359, "year": 1977, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.682, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 1977, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 539}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fe5d2971ad094a349aa7f13aa85e1bed", "name": "Hungary 2010 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 196)", "metadata": {"country": "Hungary", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Hungary lower-house election 2010, CONSTITUENCY level (196 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_association_for_somogy": "association for somogy", "votes_civil_movement": "civil movement", "votes_fidesz_mpp": "fidesz - mpp", "votes_fidesz_mpp_kdnp": "fidesz - mpp - kdnp", "votes_fidesz_mpp_kdnp_vp": "fidesz - mpp - kdnp - vp", "votes_green_left": "green left", "votes_hungarian_democratic_forum": "hungarian democratic forum", "votes_hungarian_socialist_party": "hungarian socialist party", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_small_holders_party": "independent small holders party", "votes_mcf_roma_unity_party": "mcf - roma unity party", "votes_mdf_afd": "mdf - afd", "votes_mesz": "mesz", "votes_movement_for_a_better_hungary": "movement for a better hungary", "votes_party_of_hungarian_justice_and_life": "party of hungarian justice and life", "votes_politics_can_be_different": "politics can be different", "votes_social_democratic_party_of_hungary": "social democratic party of hungary", "votes_unity_party": "unity party", "votes_workers_party": "workers' party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 196, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:05:27.259258", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.887, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.939, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.808, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.677, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.587, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.623, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.35, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.35, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Fidesz", "winner_candidate": "Pal Schmitt", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Hungarian Socialist Party", "margin": 52.8, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "HUN", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 196}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d0019cb734cc417ca645de6971ac3b39", "name": "Hungary 2006 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 196)", "metadata": {"country": "Hungary", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Hungary lower-house election 2006, CONSTITUENCY level (196 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_of_free_democrats": "alliance of free democrats", "votes_alliance_of_greens": "alliance of greens", "votes_association_for_somogy": "association for somogy", "votes_center_party": "center party", "votes_christian_democratic_party": "christian democratic party", "votes_civil_movement": "civil movement", "votes_fidesz_mpp": "fidesz - mpp", "votes_hungarian_democratic_forum": "hungarian democratic forum", "votes_hungarian_pensioners_party": "hungarian pensioners party", "votes_hungarian_provincial_party": "hungarian provincial party", "votes_hungarian_socialist_party": "hungarian socialist party", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_small_holders_party": "independent small holders party", "votes_live_chain_for_hungary": "live chain for hungary", "votes_mcf_roma_unity_party": "mcf - roma unity party", "votes_mdf_fidesz_mpp_kdnp": "mdf - fidesz - mpp - kdnp", "votes_mdf_nyup": "mdf - nyup", "votes_movement_for_a_better_hungary": "movement for a better hungary", "votes_mszp_szdsz": "mszp - szdsz", "votes_party_of_equal_chance": "party of equal chance", "votes_party_of_hungarian_justice_and_life": "party of hungarian justice and life", "votes_politics_can_be_different": "politics can be different", "votes_social_democratic_party": "social democratic party", "votes_social_democratic_party_of_hungary": "social democratic party of hungary", "votes_social_green_party_of_hungary": "social green party of hungary", "votes_union_of_hungarians_one_for_another": "union of hungarians one for another", "votes_unity_party": "unity party", "votes_workers_party": "workers' party", "votes_workers_party_of_hungary": "workers' party of hungary"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 196, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:05:22.344286", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.892, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.609, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.831, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.742, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.594, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.263, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.406, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.742, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.274, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.274, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "Laslo Solyom", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Hungarian Socialist Party", "margin": 0.8, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "HUN", "year": 2005, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 196}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "35b5be3ca0b64532aa0501f0df8dceca", "name": "Hungary 2002 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 151)", "metadata": {"country": "Hungary", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Hungary lower-house election 2002, CONSTITUENCY level (151 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_of_free_democrats": "alliance of free democrats", "votes_anti_corruption_civc_democratic_part": "anti-corruption civc democratic party", "votes_center_of_solidarity_for_hungary": "center of solidarity for hungary", "votes_democratic_party_of_hungarian_roma": "democratic party of hungarian roma", "votes_federation_of_young_democrats": "federation of young democrats", "votes_fidesz_mdf": "fidesz - mdf", "votes_green_party_of_hungary": "green party of hungary", "votes_hungarian_association_for_sustainabi": "hungarian association for sustainability", "votes_hungarian_roma_party": "hungarian roma party", "votes_hungarian_socialist_party": "hungarian socialist party", "votes_hungarian_socialist_workers_party": "hungarian socialist workers' party", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_hungarian_democratic_par": "independent hungarian democratic party", "votes_independent_small_holders_party": "independent small holders party", "votes_mszp_mszdp": "mszp - mszdp", "votes_mszp_szdsz": "mszp - szdsz", "votes_new_left_party": "new left party", "votes_party_of_hungarian_justice_and_life": "party of hungarian justice and life", "votes_pensioners_party": "pensioners' party", "votes_pest_1601": "pest 1601", "votes_reform_smallholders_party": "reform smallholders' party", "votes_smallholders_party": "smallholders' party", "votes_social_democratic_party": "social democratic party", "votes_united_party_of_hungarian_entreprene": "united party of hungarian entrepreneurs", "votes_workers_party": "workers' party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 151, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:05:18.124543", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.811, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.463, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.842, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.755, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.463, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.794, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.263, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.585, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.755, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.703, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.277, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.277, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 151}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e1a7bf9bf88d47cbb89ca3137deb0ab8", "name": "Hungary 1998 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 196)", "metadata": {"country": "Hungary", "year": 1998, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Hungary lower-house election 1998, CONSTITUENCY level (196 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_of_free_democrats": "alliance of free democrats", "votes_alliance_of_independent_citoyens": "alliance of independent citoyens", "votes_association_of_independents": "association of independents", "votes_christian_democratic_people_s_party": "christian democratic people's party", "votes_democratic_party_of_hungarian_roma": "democratic party of hungarian roma", "votes_entrepreneurs_party": "entrepreneurs party", "votes_fidesz_mpp": "fidesz - mpp", "votes_forum_of_national_minorities": "forum of national minorities", "votes_green_party_of_hungary": "green party of hungary", "votes_hungarian_democratic_forum": "hungarian democratic forum", "votes_hungarian_democratic_people_s_party": "hungarian democratic people's party", "votes_hungarian_mothers_national_party": "hungarian mothers' national party", "votes_hungarian_socialist_party": "hungarian socialist party", "votes_hungarian_socialist_workers_party": "hungarian socialist workers' party", "votes_hungarian_welfare_alliance": "hungarian welfare alliance", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_independent_small_holders_party": "independent small holders party", "votes_new_union": "new union", "votes_new_union_vp": "new union - vp", "votes_party_of_hungarian_justice_and_life": "party of hungarian justice and life", "votes_party_of_life_on_earth": "party of life on earth", "votes_social_coalition": "social coalition", "votes_social_democratic_party": "social democratic party", "votes_social_democratic_party_of_hungary": "social democratic party of hungary", "votes_social_green_party_of_hungary": "social green party of hungary", "votes_union_for_hungary": "union for hungary", "votes_women_s_party": "women's party", "votes_workers_party": "workers' party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 196, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:05:13.057351", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.822, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.468, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.84, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.754, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.8, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.657, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.263, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.754, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.245, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.245, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 196}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d0f502b81dbf44a6bb652276c9e47380", "name": "Hungary 1994 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 196)", "metadata": {"country": "Hungary", "year": 1994, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Hungary lower-house election 1994 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (196 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_asz_szdsz": "ASZ + SZDSZ", "votes_agr_rsz_vets_g": "Agr\u00e1rsz\u00f6vets\u00e9g", "votes_ciganyok_szolidaritasi_partja": "Ciganyok Szolidaritasi Partja", "votes_csaladok_orszagos_szovetsege": "Csaladok Orszagos Szovetsege", "votes_demokrata_koalicio": "Demokrata Koalicio", "votes_egyes_lt_kisgazdap_rt": "Egyes\u00fclt Kisgazdap\u00e1rt", "votes_fidesz_vp": "FIDESZ + VP", "votes_fiatal_demokrat_k_sz_vets_ge": "Fiatal Demokrat\u00e1k Sz\u00f6vets\u00e9ge", "votes_f_ggetlen_kisgazdap_rt": "F\u00fcggetlen Kisgazdap\u00e1rt", "votes_f_ggetlen_magyar_demokrata_p_rt": "F\u00fcggetlen Magyar Demokrata P\u00e1rt", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_kp_szdsz": "KP + SZDSZ", "votes_kereszt_nydemokrata_n_pp_rt": "Kereszt\u00e9nydemokrata N\u00e9pp\u00e1rt", "votes_kiegyez_s_f_ggetlen_kisgazdap_rt": "Kiegyez\u00e9s F\u00fcggetlen Kisgazdap\u00e1rt", "votes_konzervat_v_p_rt": "Konzervat\u00edv P\u00e1rt", "votes_k_zt_rsas_g_p_rt": "K\u00f6zt\u00e1rsas\u00e1g P\u00e1rt", "votes_magyar_demokrata_f_rum": "Magyar Demokrata F\u00f3rum", "votes_magyar_igazs_g_s_let_p_rtja": "Magyar Igazs\u00e1g \u00e9s \u00c9let P\u00e1rtja", "votes_magyar_szocialista_p_rt": "Magyar Szocialista P\u00e1rt", "votes_magyar_szoci_ldemokrata_p_rt": "Magyar Szoci\u00e1ldemokrata P\u00e1rt", "votes_magyarosz_gi_z_ld_p_rt": "Magyarosz\u00e1gi Z\u00f6ld P\u00e1rt", "votes_munk_sp_rt": "Munk\u00e1sp\u00e1rt", "votes_nemzeti_demokrata_sz_vets_g": "Nemzeti Demokrata Sz\u00f6vets\u00e9g", "votes_nyugdijasok_partja": "Nyugdijasok Partja", "votes_piac_p_rt": "Piac P\u00e1rt", "votes_szabad_demokrat_k_sz_vets_ge": "Szabad Demokrat\u00e1k Sz\u00f6vets\u00e9ge", "votes_tortenelmi_fuggetlen_kisgazdapart": "Tortenelmi Fuggetlen Kisgazdapart", "votes_vp_asz": "VP + ASZ", "votes_v_llalkoz_k_part": "V\u00e1llalkoz\u00f3k Part", "votes_z_ld_alternat_va": "Z\u00f6ld Alternat\u00edva", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 196, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 20}, "n_stations_flagged": 20, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:05:06.976401", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.82, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.47, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.842, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.755, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.47, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.66, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.263, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.572, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.643, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.755, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.719, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.245, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.245, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 196}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6a97e2f4d3db40e18f56b8bf48299681", "name": "Hungary 1990 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 196)", "metadata": {"country": "Hungary", "year": 1990, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Hungary lower-house election 1990 (March), CONSTITUENCY level (196 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_asz_hvk": "ASZ + HVK", "votes_agr_rsz_vets_g": "Agr\u00e1rsz\u00f6vets\u00e9g", "votes_fedisz_tedisz": "FEDISZ+TEDISZ+", "votes_fidesz_kdnp_szdsz": "FIDESZ + KDNP + SZDSZ", "votes_fidesz_szdsz": "FIDESZ + SZDSZ", "votes_fiatal_demokrat_k_sz_vets_ge": "Fiatal Demokrat\u00e1k Sz\u00f6vets\u00e9ge", "votes_f_ggetlen_kisgazdap_rt": "F\u00fcggetlen Kisgazdap\u00e1rt", "votes_f_ggetlen_magyar_demokrata_p_rt": "F\u00fcggetlen Magyar Demokrata P\u00e1rt", "votes_f_ggetlen_szoci_ldemokrata_p_rt": "F\u00fcggetlen Szoci\u00e1ldemokrata P\u00e1rt", "votes_hazafias_v_laszt_si_koal_ci": "Hazafias V\u00e1laszt\u00e1si Koal\u00edci\u00f3", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_kereszt_nydemokrata_n_pp_rt": "Kereszt\u00e9nydemokrata N\u00e9pp\u00e1rt", "votes_mszp_asz": "MSZP + ASZ", "votes_magyar_demokrata_f_rum": "Magyar Demokrata F\u00f3rum", "votes_magyar_f_ggetlens_gi_p_rt": "Magyar F\u00fcggetlens\u00e9gi P\u00e1rt", "votes_magyar_n_pp_rt": "Magyar N\u00e9pp\u00e1rt", "votes_magyar_szocialista_munk_sp_rt": "Magyar Szocialista Munk\u00e1sp\u00e1rt", "votes_magyar_szocialista_p_rt": "Magyar Szocialista P\u00e1rt", "votes_magyar_szoci_ldemokrata_p_rt": "Magyar Szoci\u00e1ldemokrata P\u00e1rt", "votes_magyar_sz_vetkezeti_s_agr_rp_rt": "Magyar Sz\u00f6vetkezeti \u00e9s Agr\u00e1rp\u00e1rt", "votes_magyarosz_gi_z_ld_p_rt": "Magyarosz\u00e1gi Z\u00f6ld P\u00e1rt", "votes_nemzedekek_partja": "Nemzedekek Partja", "votes_nemzeti_kisgazdap_rt": "Nemzeti Kisgazdap\u00e1rt", "votes_szfv_asz": "SZFV +ASZ", "votes_somogyi_kereszt_ny_koal_ci": "Somogyi Kereszt\u00e9ny Koal\u00edci\u00f3", "votes_szabad_demokrat_k_sz_vets_ge": "Szabad Demokrat\u00e1k Sz\u00f6vets\u00e9ge", "votes_szabads_g_p_rt": "Szabads\u00e1g P\u00e1rt", "votes_szent_korona_tarsasag": "Szent Korona Tarsasag", "votes_szovetseg_a_faluert_a_videkert": "Szovetseg a Faluert, a Videkert", "votes_v_llalkoz_k_part": "V\u00e1llalkoz\u00f3k Part", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 196, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:05:00.904358", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.815, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.46, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.715, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.46, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.791, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.659, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.263, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 1990, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.575, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.644, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 1990, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.715, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 1990, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.691, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.262, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.262, "year": 1990, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 196}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c989040e898a43a68c729c2a9f17709d", "name": "Ghana 2008 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 229)", "metadata": {"country": "Ghana", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ghana lower-house election 2008, CONSTITUENCY level (229 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_cpp": "CPP", "votes_dfp": "DFP", "votes_dpp": "DPP", "votes_ind": "IND", "votes_ndc": "NDC", "votes_npp": "NPP", "votes_pnc": "PNC", "votes_rpd": "RPD"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 229, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:04:54.811541", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.857, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.652, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.732, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.632, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.652, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.289, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.413, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.467, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.198, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.632, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.528, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.528, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "NDC", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "NPP", "margin": 0.45, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "GHA", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 229}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9b732bc60e0b4fae9ece7cbc67314304", "name": "Ghana 2004 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 230)", "metadata": {"country": "Ghana", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ghana lower-house election 2004 (December), CONSTITUENCY level (230 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_convention_people_s_party": "Convention People's Party", "votes_democratic_people_s_party": "Democratic People's Party", "votes_every_ghanaian_living_everywhere": "Every Ghanaian Living Everywhere", "votes_great_consolidated_popular_party": "Great Consolidated Popular Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_national_democratic_congress": "National Democratic Congress", "votes_national_reform_party": "National Reform Party", "votes_new_patriotic_party": "New Patriotic Party", "votes_people_s_national_convention": "People's National Convention"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 230, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 230, "cast_gt_registered": 230}, "n_stations_flagged": 230, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:04:50.723546", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.509, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.292, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.734, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.635, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.509, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.292, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.662, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.775, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.467, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.635, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.526, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.526, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.623, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "NPP", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "NDC", "margin": 9.61, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "GHA", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 230}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "481c077eec8f4d778d1e49eb71e2427e", "name": "Ghana 2000 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 200)", "metadata": {"country": "Ghana", "year": 2000, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ghana lower-house election 2000 (December), CONSTITUENCY level (200 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_convention_people_s_party": "Convention People's Party", "votes_great_consolidated_popular_party": "Great Consolidated Popular Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_national_democratic_congress": "National Democratic Congress", "votes_national_reform_party": "National Reform Party", "votes_new_patriotic_party": "New Patriotic Party", "votes_people_s_national_convention": "People's National Convention", "votes_united_ghana_movement": "United Ghana Movement"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 200, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:04:39.550150", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.602, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.847, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.664, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.602, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.967, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.492, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.775, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.77, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.664, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.664, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.453, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.453, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.585, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.585, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.888, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "NPP", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "NDC", "margin": 13.81, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "GHA", "year": 2000, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 200}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1eaf34c1d6974a24b613b9d3eb98cfb7", "name": "Ghana 1996 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 200)", "metadata": {"country": "Ghana", "year": 1996, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ghana lower-house election 1996 (December), CONSTITUENCY level (200 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_national_democratic_congress": "National Democratic Congress", "votes_new_patriotic_party": "New Patriotic Party", "votes_people_s_convention_party": "People's Convention Party", "votes_people_s_national_convention": "People's National Convention"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 200, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 200, "cast_gt_registered": 198}, "n_stations_flagged": 200, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:04:35.479616", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.808, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.208, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.513, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.425, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.808, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.208, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.192, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.356, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.339, "year": 1996, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.388, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.032, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.758, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.197, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.513, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.513, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.425, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.425, "year": 1996, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.355, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.355, "year": 1996, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.823, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 1996, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "NDC", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "NPP", "margin": 17.8, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "GHA", "year": 1996, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 200}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "663de8ed296e4ec5a26dbb6f367e0c52", "name": "Germany 2009 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 315)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 2009, CONSTITUENCY level (315 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_ab_jetzt_demokratie_durch_volksabsti": "ab jetzt\u0085demokratie durch volksabstimmung", "votes_allianz_der_mitte": "allianz der mitte", "votes_bayernpartei": "bayernpartei", "votes_b_ndnis_21_rentnerinnen_und_rentner_": "b\u00fcndnis 21/rentnerinnen- und rentner-partei", "votes_b_rgerrechtsbewegung_solidarit_t": "b\u00fcrgerrechtsbewegung solidarit\u00e4t", "votes_christlich_demokratische_union": "christlich demokratische union", "votes_christlich_soziale_union_in_bayern": "christlich-soziale union in bayern", "votes_christliche_mitte_f_r_ein_deutschlan": "christliche mitte \u0097 f\u00fcr ein deutschland nach gottes geboten", "votes_deutsche_kommunistische_partei_dkp": "deutsche kommunistische partei (dkp)", "votes_deutsche_volksunioin": "deutsche volksunioin", "votes_deutsche_zentrumspartei": "deutsche zentrumspartei", "votes_die_gr_nen": "die gr\u00fcnen", "votes_die_linkspartei_partei_des_demokrati": "die linkspartei.partei des demokratischen sozialismus", "votes_die_republikaner": "die republikaner", "votes_die_violetten_f_r_spirituelle_politi": "die violetten \u0096 f\u00fcr spirituelle politik", "votes_familienpartei_deutschlands": "familienpartei deutschlands", "votes_freie_demokratische_partei": "freie demokratische partei", "votes_freie_union": "freie union", "votes_freie_w_hler_deutschland": "freie w\u00e4hler deutschland", "votes_k_dippel": "k:dippel", "votes_k_siegmund": "k:siegmund", "votes_marxistisch_leninistische_partei_deu": "marxistisch-leninistische partei deutschlands", "votes_mensch_umwelt_tierschutz": "mensch umwelt tierschutz", "votes_nationaldemokratische_partei_deutsch": "nationaldemokratische partei deutschlands", "votes_partei_bibeltreuer_christen": "partei bibeltreuer christen", "votes_partei_f_r_soziale_gleichheit_sektio": "partei f\u00fcr soziale gleichheit, sektion der vierten internationale", "votes_piratenpartei_deutschland": "piratenpartei deutschland", "votes_rentner_partei_deutschland": "rentner partei deutschland", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "sozialdemokratische partei deutschlands", "votes_kologisch_demokratische_partei": "\u00d6kologisch-demokratische partei", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 315, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:04:29.567586", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.946, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.9, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.862, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.973, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.993, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.542, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 315}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3f28ceb021b34ad08926b7fdb02ba09c", "name": "Germany 2005 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 315)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 2005, CONSTITUENCY level (315 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_50plus_das_generationen_b_ndnis": "50plus das generationen-b\u00fcndnis", "votes_allianz_f_r_gesundheit_frieden_und_s": "allianz f\u00fcr gesundheit, frieden und soziale gerechtigkeit", "votes_anarchistische_pogo_partei_deutschla": "anarchistische pogo-partei deutschlands", "votes_bayernpartei": "bayernpartei", "votes_b_rgerrechtsbewegung_solidarit_t": "b\u00fcrgerrechtsbewegung solidarit\u00e4t", "votes_christlich_demokratische_union": "christlich demokratische union", "votes_christlich_soziale_union_in_bayern": "christlich-soziale union in bayern", "votes_christliche_mitte_f_r_ein_deutschlan": "christliche mitte \u0097 f\u00fcr ein deutschland nach gottes geboten", "votes_deutsche_soziale_union": "deutsche soziale union", "votes_deutsche_zentrumspartei": "deutsche zentrumspartei", "votes_deutschland": "deutschland", "votes_die_grauen_graue_panther": "die grauen \u0096 graue panther", "votes_die_gr_nen": "die gr\u00fcnen", "votes_die_linkspartei_partei_des_demokrati": "die linkspartei.partei des demokratischen sozialismus", "votes_die_partei": "die partei", "votes_die_republikaner": "die republikaner", "votes_familienpartei_deutschlands": "familienpartei deutschlands", "votes_feministische_partei_die_frauen": "feministische partei die frauen", "votes_freie_demokratische_partei": "freie demokratische partei", "votes_humanistische_partei": "humanistische partei", "votes_marxistisch_leninistische_partei_deu": "marxistisch-leninistische partei deutschlands", "votes_mensch_umwelt_tierschutz": "mensch umwelt tierschutz", "votes_nationaldemokratische_partei_deutsch": "nationaldemokratische partei deutschlands", "votes_partei_bibeltreuer_christen": "partei bibeltreuer christen", "votes_partei_f_r_soziale_gleichheit_sektio": "partei f\u00fcr soziale gleichheit, sektion der vierten internationale", "votes_partei_rechtsstaatlicher_offensive": "partei rechtsstaatlicher offensive", "votes_pro_deutsche_mitte_initiative_pro_d_": "pro deutsche mitte \u0096 initiative pro d-mark", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "sozialdemokratische partei deutschlands", "votes_unabh_ngige": "unabh\u00c4ngige", "votes_brige": "\u00dcbrige", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 315, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:04:22.352252", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.942, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.859, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.972, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.993, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.512, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 315}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8f0ffce0765c4758b342212a1a762151", "name": "Germany 2002 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 315)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 2002, CONSTITUENCY level (315 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_aufbruch_f_r_b_rgerrechte_freiheit_u": "aufbruch f\u00fcr b\u00fcrgerrechte, freiheit und gesundheit", "votes_bayernpartei": "bayernpartei", "votes_b_rgerrechtsbewegung_solidarit_t": "b\u00fcrgerrechtsbewegung solidarit\u00e4t", "votes_christlich_demokratische_union": "christlich demokratische union", "votes_christlich_soziale_union_in_bayern": "christlich-soziale union in bayern", "votes_christliche_mitte_f_r_ein_deutschlan": "christliche mitte \u0097 f\u00fcr ein deutschland nach gottes geboten", "votes_deutsche_kommunistische_partei_dkp": "deutsche kommunistische partei (dkp)", "votes_deutsche_soziale_union": "deutsche soziale union", "votes_deutsche_zentrumspartei": "deutsche zentrumspartei", "votes_deutschland": "deutschland", "votes_die_grauen_graue_panther": "die grauen \u0096 graue panther", "votes_die_gr_nen": "die gr\u00fcnen", "votes_die_republikaner": "die republikaner", "votes_die_violetten_f_r_spirituelle_politi": "die violetten \u0096 f\u00fcr spirituelle politik", "votes_familienpartei_deutschlands": "familienpartei deutschlands", "votes_feministische_partei_die_frauen": "feministische partei die frauen", "votes_freie_demokratische_partei": "freie demokratische partei", "votes_freiheitliche_partei_deutschlands": "freiheitliche partei deutschlands", "votes_humanistische_partei": "humanistische partei", "votes_kommunistische_partei_deutschlands": "kommunistische partei deutschlands", "votes_mensch_umwelt_tierschutz": "mensch umwelt tierschutz", "votes_nationaldemokratische_partei_deutsch": "nationaldemokratische partei deutschlands", "votes_partei_bibeltreuer_christen": "partei bibeltreuer christen", "votes_partei_des_demokratischen_sozialismu": "partei des demokratischen sozialismus (pds)", "votes_partei_f_r_rentengerechtigkeit_und_f": "partei f\u00fcr rentengerechtigkeit und familie", "votes_schill_partei": "schill-partei", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "sozialdemokratische partei deutschlands", "votes_kologisch_demokratische_partei": "\u00d6kologisch-demokratische partei", "votes_brige": "\u00dcbrige"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 315, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:04:13.223774", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.939, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.831, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.898, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.859, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 315}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3d49a28e1f3f455aaea7af40f8775632", "name": "Germany 1998 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 344)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1998, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1998 (September), CONSTITUENCY level (344 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_b_ndnis_90_die_gr_nen": "B\u00fcndnis '90/Die Gr\u00fcnen", "votes_christlich_demokratische_union": "Christlich Demokratische Union", "votes_christlich_soziale_union": "Christlich Soziale Union", "votes_freie_demokratische_partei": "Freie Demokratische Partei", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_partei_des_demokratischen_sozialismu": "Partei des demokratischen Sozialismus", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 344, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:04:01.136915", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.94, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.831, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.894, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.856, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.965, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.767, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.561, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.64, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.894, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 344}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8046e34cde06485bab36b88d7f1b870a", "name": "Germany 1994 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 344)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1994, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1994 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (344 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_b_ndnis_90_die_gr_nen": "B\u00fcndnis '90/Die Gr\u00fcnen", "votes_christlich_demokratische_union": "Christlich Demokratische Union", "votes_christlich_soziale_union": "Christlich Soziale Union", "votes_freie_demokratische_partei": "Freie Demokratische Partei", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_partei_des_demokratischen_sozialismu": "Partei des demokratischen Sozialismus", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 344, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:03:55.985716", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.94, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.83, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.853, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.964, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.764, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.594, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 344}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "202be2bdfd264149b70f89f337175e8c", "name": "Germany 1990 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 344)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1990, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1990 (December), CONSTITUENCY level (344 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_b_ndnis_90": "B\u00fcndnis '90", "votes_christlich_demokratische_union": "Christlich Demokratische Union", "votes_christlich_soziale_union": "Christlich Soziale Union", "votes_die_gr_nen": "Die Gr\u00fcnen", "votes_die_republikaner": "Die Republikaner", "votes_freie_demokratische_partei": "Freie Demokratische Partei", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_partei_des_demokratischen_sozialismu": "Partei des demokratischen Sozialismus", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 344, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 302}, "n_stations_flagged": 302, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:03:50.945432", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.928, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.85, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.892, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.853, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.961, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.595, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.823, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 1990, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 344}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "94426ba58ce24f31b5e022c0d02a43ef", "name": "Germany 1987 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 258)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1987, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1987 (January), CONSTITUENCY level (258 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_christlich_demokratische_union": "Christlich Demokratische Union", "votes_christlich_soziale_union": "Christlich Soziale Union", "votes_die_gr_nen": "Die Gr\u00fcnen", "votes_freie_demokratische_partei": "Freie Demokratische Partei", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 258, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 258}, "n_stations_flagged": 258, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:03:46.890392", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.941, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.835, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.864, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.823, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.761, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.595, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 1987, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.823, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.979, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 258}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0134f7eb9d594e008001d89cc1471460", "name": "Germany 1983 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 258)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1983, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1983 (March), CONSTITUENCY level (258 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_christlich_demokratische_union": "Christlich Demokratische Union", "votes_christlich_soziale_union": "Christlich Soziale Union", "votes_die_gr_nen": "Die Gr\u00fcnen", "votes_freie_demokratische_partei": "Freie Demokratische Partei", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 258, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 46}, "n_stations_flagged": 46, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:03:41.801036", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.942, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.848, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.864, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.82, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.964, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.764, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 1983, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.979, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 258}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "10d84548d3964b97b2a4a928b4fd3b72", "name": "Germany 1980 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 258)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1980, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1980 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (258 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_christlich_demokratische_union": "Christlich Demokratische Union", "votes_christlich_soziale_union": "Christlich Soziale Union", "votes_freie_demokratische_partei": "Freie Demokratische Partei", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 258, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:03:37.770674", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.94, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.849, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.864, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.822, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.702, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 1980, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.979, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 258}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ad54b85e5129420a9bacfd5765fb39fd", "name": "Germany 1976 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 258)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1976, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1976 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (258 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_christlich_demokratische_union": "Christlich Demokratische Union", "votes_christlich_soziale_union": "Christlich Soziale Union", "votes_freie_demokratische_partei": "Freie Demokratische Partei", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 258, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:03:33.717064", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.863, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.849, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.854, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.809, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.696, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.809, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 258}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3daa00e52b7f4af5b1b84859e260419d", "name": "Germany 1972 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 258)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1972, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1972 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (258 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_christlich_demokratische_union": "Christlich Demokratische Union", "votes_christlich_soziale_union": "Christlich Soziale Union", "votes_freie_demokratische_partei": "Freie Demokratische Partei", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 258, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:03:29.626855", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.872, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.852, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.854, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.81, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.872, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.693, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.6, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 1972, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.939, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 258}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fb047b007b274f229e256e8faa029857", "name": "Germany 1969 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 258)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1969, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1969 (September), CONSTITUENCY level (258 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_christlich_demokratische_union": "Christlich Demokratische Union", "votes_christlich_soziale_union": "Christlich Soziale Union", "votes_freie_demokratische_partei": "Freie Demokratische Partei", "votes_nationaldemokratische_partei_deutsch": "Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 258, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:03:25.570321", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.874, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.759, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.842, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.795, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.874, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.759, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.542, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 1969, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 1969, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.795, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 1969, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 1969, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1969, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 258}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "344d068b65664afdb4ea5d2371ec633e", "name": "Germany 1965 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 258)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1965, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1965 (September), CONSTITUENCY level (258 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_christlich_demokratische_union": "Christlich Demokratische Union", "votes_christlich_soziale_union": "Christlich Soziale Union", "votes_freie_demokratische_partei": "Freie Demokratische Partei", "votes_nationaldemokratische_partei_deutsch": "Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 258, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:03:20.470881", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.873, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.762, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.8, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.689, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.584, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 1965, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.012, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.012, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 258}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6913e75366be4c1eb80cc052c1996ede", "name": "Germany 1961 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 257)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1961, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1961 (September), CONSTITUENCY level (257 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_christlich_demokratische_union": "Christlich Demokratische Union", "votes_christlich_soziale_union": "Christlich Soziale Union", "votes_deutsche_reichspartei": "Deutsche Reichspartei", "votes_freie_demokratische_partei": "Freie Demokratische Partei", "votes_gesamtdeutsche_partei": "Gesamtdeutsche Partei", "votes_gesamtdeutsche_volkspartei": "Gesamtdeutsche Volkspartei", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 257, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3, "cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:03:16.401371", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.768, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.835, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.789, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.693, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.587, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 1961, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 1961, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 1961, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 1961, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.012, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.012, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 1961, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 257}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d9fa62b4dc7e48a39cf3bf3a0215bee4", "name": "Germany 1957 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 257)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1957, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1957 (September), CONSTITUENCY level (257 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_christlich_demokratische_union": "Christlich Demokratische Union", "votes_christlich_soziale_union": "Christlich Soziale Union", "votes_deutsche_partei": "Deutsche Partei", "votes_deutsche_reichspartei": "Deutsche Reichspartei", "votes_freie_demokratische_partei": "Freie Demokratische Partei", "votes_f_deralistische_union": "F\u00f6deralistische Union", "votes_gesamtdeutscher_block_bund_der_heima": "Gesamtdeutscher Block-Bund der Heimatvertriebenen und Entrec", "votes_gesamtdeutscher_block_bund_2": "Gesamtdeutscher Block-Bund der Heimatvertriebenen und Entrechteten", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_s_dschleswigscher_w_hlerverband_syds": "S\u00fcdschleswigscher W\u00e4hlerverband-Sydslesvigsk v\u00e6lgerforening"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 257, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:03:11.328124", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.87, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.738, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.832, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.786, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 1957, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.508, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.627, "year": 1957, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 1957, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.786, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 1957, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 1957, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.014, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.014, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 257}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0d3fdf699f144162a3c131d4a3626aea", "name": "Germany 1953 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 251)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1953, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1953 (September), CONSTITUENCY level (251 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bayernpartei": "Bayernpartei", "votes_christlich_demokratische_union": "Christlich Demokratische Union", "votes_deutsche_partei": "Deutsche Partei", "votes_deutsche_reichspartei": "Deutsche Reichspartei", "votes_freie_demokratische_partei": "Freie Demokratische Partei", "votes_gesamtdeutsche_volkspartei": "Gesamtdeutsche Volkspartei", "votes_gesamtdeutscher_block_bund_der_heima": "Gesamtdeutscher Block-Bund der Heimatvertriebenen und Entrec", "votes_gesamtdeutscher_block_bund_2": "Gesamtdeutscher Block-Bund der Heimatvertriebenen und Entrechteten", "votes_kommunistische_partei_deutschlands": "Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_s_dschleswigscher_w_hlerverband_syds": "S\u00fcdschleswigscher W\u00e4hlerverband-Sydslesvigsk v\u00e6lgerforening", "votes_zentrum": "Zentrum"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 251, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:03:06.257066", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.59, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.812, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.765, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 1953, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.496, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 1953, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 1953, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 1953, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.718, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.718, "year": 1953, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.018, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 251}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "daaf726164a0402da03a998416309a25", "name": "Germany 1949 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 242)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1949, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1949 (August), CONSTITUENCY level (242 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bayernpartei": "Bayernpartei", "votes_christlich_demokratische_union": "Christlich Demokratische Union", "votes_christlich_soziale_union": "Christlich Soziale Union", "votes_deutsche_konservative_partei": "Deutsche Konservative Partei", "votes_deutsche_partei": "Deutsche Partei", "votes_deutsche_rechtspartei": "Deutsche Rechtspartei", "votes_freie_demokratische_partei": "Freie Demokratische Partei", "votes_kommunistische_partei_deutschlands": "Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_s_dschleswigscher_w_hlerverband_syds": "S\u00fcdschleswigscher W\u00e4hlerverband-Sydslesvigsk v\u00e6lgerforening", "votes_wirtschaftliche_aufbauvereinigung": "Wirtschaftliche Aufbauvereinigung", "votes_zentrum": "Zentrum"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 242, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:02:58.196380", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.668, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.584, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.793, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.742, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.668, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.584, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.249, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 1949, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.876, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1949, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 1949, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.742, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 1949, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.682, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 1949, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.02, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.02, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 242}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bb32ff3fa0884c849cffea05db59badd", "name": "Germany 1912 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 397)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1912, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1912 (January), CONSTITUENCY level (397 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_deutsche_konservative": "Deutsche Konservative", "votes_deutsche_reformpartei": "Deutsche Reformpartei", "votes_deutsche_reichspartei": "Deutsche Reichspartei", "votes_forschrittliche_volkspartei": "Forschrittliche Volkspartei", "votes_nationalliberale": "Nationalliberale", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_polen": "Polen", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_wirtschaftsvereinigung": "Wirtschaftsvereinigung", "votes_zentrum": "Zentrum"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 397, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:02:53.036565", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.899, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.245, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.254, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.23, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.725, "year": 1912, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.245, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 1912, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.929, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1912, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.247, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 1912, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 1912, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 1912, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.326, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.332, "year": 1912, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.254, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.254, "year": 1912, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.23, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.23, "year": 1912, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.181, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.181, "year": 1912, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.65, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 1912, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 1912, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.077, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.077, "year": 1912, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 1912, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 397}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6b70a95df90c4578b05e056cee24892c", "name": "Germany 1907 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 397)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1907, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1907 (January), CONSTITUENCY level (397 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_a_wv": "A + WV", "votes_drp_as_cs": "DRP + AS + CS", "votes_deutsche_konservative": "Deutsche Konservative", "votes_deutsche_reichspartei": "Deutsche Reichspartei", "votes_deutsche_volkspartei": "Deutsche Volkspartei", "votes_freisinnige_vereinigung": "Freisinnige Vereinigung", "votes_freisinnige_volkspartei": "Freisinnige Volkspartei", "votes_nationalliberale": "Nationalliberale", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_polen": "Polen", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_zentrum": "Zentrum"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 397, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:02:46.986519", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.764, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.21, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.253, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.23, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.764, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 1907, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.21, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 1907, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.905, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 1907, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.27, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.568, "year": 1907, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 1907, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 1907, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.319, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 1907, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.253, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.253, "year": 1907, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.23, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.23, "year": 1907, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.171, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.171, "year": 1907, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.648, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 1907, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 1907, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.077, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.077, "year": 1907, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.608, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.608, "year": 1907, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 397}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e76a8a7b77154b2fba5b647e2eff0934", "name": "Germany 1903 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 397)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1903, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1903 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (397 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_antisemiten": "Antisemiten", "votes_bayerischer_bauernbund": "Bayerischer Bauernbund", "votes_bund_der_landwirte": "Bund der Landwirte", "votes_deutsche_konservative": "Deutsche Konservative", "votes_deutsche_reichspartei": "Deutsche Reichspartei", "votes_deutsche_volkspartei": "Deutsche Volkspartei", "votes_freisinnige_vereinigung": "Freisinnige Vereinigung", "votes_freisinnige_volkspartei": "Freisinnige Volkspartei", "votes_nationalliberale": "Nationalliberale", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_polen": "Polen", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_zentrum": "Zentrum"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 397, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:02:41.901118", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.791, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.241, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.248, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.227, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.791, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.698, "year": 1903, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.241, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 1903, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1903, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.275, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 1903, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 1903, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 1903, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1903, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.248, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.248, "year": 1903, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.227, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.227, "year": 1903, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.17, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.17, "year": 1903, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.648, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 1903, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 1903, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.077, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.077, "year": 1903, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.61, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 1903, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 397}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c64c4c1d5f554f69a85d1418c5f4c9f5", "name": "Germany 1898 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 397)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1898, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1898 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (397 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_antisemiten": "Antisemiten", "votes_bayerischer_bauernbund": "Bayerischer Bauernbund", "votes_bund_der_landwirte": "Bund der Landwirte", "votes_deutsche_konservative": "Deutsche Konservative", "votes_deutsche_reichspartei": "Deutsche Reichspartei", "votes_deutsche_volkspartei": "Deutsche Volkspartei", "votes_freisinnige_vereinigung": "Freisinnige Vereinigung", "votes_freisinnige_volkspartei": "Freisinnige Volkspartei", "votes_nationalliberale": "Nationalliberale", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_polen": "Polen", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_zentrum": "Zentrum"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 397, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:02:36.849649", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.703, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.813, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.241, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.221, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.703, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 1898, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 1898, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.837, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 1898, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.555, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.389, "year": 1898, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 1898, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 1898, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.241, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.241, "year": 1898, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.221, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.221, "year": 1898, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.165, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.165, "year": 1898, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 1898, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 1898, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.077, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.077, "year": 1898, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.619, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 1898, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 397}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f57a79416fad4ce28a100851b32dbb32", "name": "Germany 1893 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 397)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1893, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1893 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (397 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_drp_as": "DRP + AS", "votes_deutsche_konservative": "Deutsche Konservative", "votes_deutsche_reichspartei": "Deutsche Reichspartei", "votes_freisinnige_vereinigung": "Freisinnige Vereinigung", "votes_freisinnige_volkspartei": "Freisinnige Volkspartei", "votes_nationalliberale": "Nationalliberale", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_polen": "Polen", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_s_ddeutsche_volkspartei": "S\u00fcddeutsche Volkspartei", "votes_zentrum": "Zentrum"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 397, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:02:31.787859", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.672, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.844, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.238, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.221, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.672, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 1893, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 1893, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 1893, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 1893, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 1893, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 1893, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.238, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.238, "year": 1893, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.221, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.221, "year": 1893, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.623, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 1893, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 1893, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.077, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.077, "year": 1893, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 1893, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 397}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "db29cc35140e428e919f128046c7ac9d", "name": "Germany 1890 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 397)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1890, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1890 (February), CONSTITUENCY level (397 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_antisemiten": "Antisemiten", "votes_deutsche_freisinnige_partei": "Deutsche Freisinnige Partei", "votes_deutsche_konservative": "Deutsche Konservative", "votes_deutsche_reichspartei": "Deutsche Reichspartei", "votes_deutsche_volkspartei": "Deutsche Volkspartei", "votes_nationalliberale": "Nationalliberale", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_polen": "Polen", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_w_dan_e": "W + DAN + E", "votes_zentrum": "Zentrum"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 397, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:02:26.665424", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.662, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.806, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.236, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.22, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.662, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 1890, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.806, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 1890, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 1890, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.569, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 1890, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 1890, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 1890, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.236, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.236, "year": 1890, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.22, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.22, "year": 1890, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.615, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 1890, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 1890, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.077, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.077, "year": 1890, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 1890, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 397}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cd00602e97f5423594c9d96ce748a589", "name": "Germany 1887 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 397)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1887, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1887 (February), CONSTITUENCY level (397 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_dan_e": "DAN + E", "votes_deutsche_freisinnige_partei": "Deutsche Freisinnige Partei", "votes_deutsche_konservative": "Deutsche Konservative", "votes_deutsche_reichspartei": "Deutsche Reichspartei", "votes_deutsche_volkspartei": "Deutsche Volkspartei", "votes_nationalliberale": "Nationalliberale", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_polen": "Polen", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_welfen": "Welfen", "votes_zentrum": "Zentrum"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 397, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:02:15.540374", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.684, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.799, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.232, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.218, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1887, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.799, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 1887, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 1887, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.541, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.385, "year": 1887, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 1887, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 1887, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.232, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.232, "year": 1887, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.218, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.218, "year": 1887, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 1887, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 1887, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.077, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.077, "year": 1887, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 1887, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 397}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d7b2e099098a43f8a62f63cff20b0377", "name": "Germany 1884 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 397)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1884, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1884 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (397 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_dan_e": "DAN + E", "votes_deutsche_freisinnige_partei": "Deutsche Freisinnige Partei", "votes_deutsche_konservative": "Deutsche Konservative", "votes_deutsche_reichspartei": "Deutsche Reichspartei", "votes_deutsche_volkspartei": "Deutsche Volkspartei", "votes_nationalliberale": "Nationalliberale", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_polen": "Polen", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_welfen": "Welfen", "votes_zentrum": "Zentrum"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 397, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:02:09.470765", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.666, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.84, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.231, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.218, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 1884, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.84, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 1884, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.828, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 1884, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.566, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 1884, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 1884, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 1884, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.231, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.231, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.218, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.218, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 1884, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 1884, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.077, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.077, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 1884, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 397}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "56ff1fc4b4ff4c7d9701874aafa83375", "name": "Germany 1881 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 397)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1881, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1881 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (397 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_deutsche_konservative": "Deutsche Konservative", "votes_deutsche_reichspartei": "Deutsche Reichspartei", "votes_deutsche_volkspartei": "Deutsche Volkspartei", "votes_d_nen": "D\u00e4nen", "votes_els_sser": "Els\u00e4sser", "votes_fortschrittspartei": "Fortschrittspartei", "votes_liberale_vereinigung": "Liberale Vereinigung", "votes_nationalliberale": "Nationalliberale", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_polen": "Polen", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_welfen": "Welfen", "votes_zentrum": "Zentrum"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 397, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:01:54.225766", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.698, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.845, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.23, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.218, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.698, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 1881, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 1881, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.79, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.448, "year": 1881, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.512, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.378, "year": 1881, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 1881, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 1881, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.23, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.23, "year": 1881, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.218, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.218, "year": 1881, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 1881, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 1881, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.077, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.077, "year": 1881, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 1881, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 397}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9861304ff81b4e808ea3308b14cb8e4f", "name": "Germany 1878 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 397)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1878, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1878 (July), CONSTITUENCY level (397 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_deutsche_konservative": "Deutsche Konservative", "votes_deutsche_reichspartei": "Deutsche Reichspartei", "votes_deutsche_volkspartei": "Deutsche Volkspartei", "votes_fortschrittspartei": "Fortschrittspartei", "votes_nationalliberale": "Nationalliberale", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_partikularisten": "Partikularisten", "votes_polen": "Polen", "votes_protest_partei": "Protest Partei", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_zentrum": "Zentrum"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 397, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:01:48.121101", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.694, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.822, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.231, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.218, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.694, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.673, "year": 1878, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 1878, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.826, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 1878, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.55, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 1878, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 1878, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 1878, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.231, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.231, "year": 1878, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.218, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.218, "year": 1878, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 1878, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 1878, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.077, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.077, "year": 1878, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 1878, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 397}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "54dac812018445268fb9c5f20d1bfec1", "name": "Germany 1877 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 397)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1877, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1877 (January), CONSTITUENCY level (397 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_deutsche_konservative": "Deutsche Konservative", "votes_deutsche_reichspartei": "Deutsche Reichspartei", "votes_deutsche_volkspartei": "Deutsche Volkspartei", "votes_fortschrittspartei": "Fortschrittspartei", "votes_nationalliberale": "Nationalliberale", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_partikularisten": "Partikularisten", "votes_polen": "Polen", "votes_protest_partei": "Protest Partei", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_zentrum": "Zentrum"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 397, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:01:43.050037", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.691, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.852, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.232, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.219, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.691, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.673, "year": 1877, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 1877, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.828, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 1877, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.391, "year": 1877, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 1877, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 1877, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.232, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.232, "year": 1877, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 1877, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 1877, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 1877, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.077, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.077, "year": 1877, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 1877, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 397}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1cd8da2e0814472a951e17a1db6279f1", "name": "Germany 1874 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 397)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1874, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1874 (February), CONSTITUENCY level (397 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_deutsche_konservative": "Deutsche Konservative", "votes_deutsche_reichspartei": "Deutsche Reichspartei", "votes_deutsche_volkspartei": "Deutsche Volkspartei", "votes_fortschrittspartei": "Fortschrittspartei", "votes_liberale_reichspartei": "Liberale Reichspartei", "votes_nationalliberale": "Nationalliberale", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_partikularisten": "Partikularisten", "votes_polen": "Polen", "votes_protest_partei": "Protest Partei", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_zentrum": "Zentrum"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 397, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:01:37.981731", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.663, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.834, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.232, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.218, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 1874, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 1874, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.453, "year": 1874, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.561, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.39, "year": 1874, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 1874, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 1874, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.232, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.232, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.218, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.218, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 1874, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 1874, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.077, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.077, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 1874, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 397}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fc1c6695ae454798a0c69648a883118f", "name": "Germany 1871 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 382)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1871, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Germany lower-house election 1871 (March), CONSTITUENCY level (382 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_deutsche_konservative": "Deutsche Konservative", "votes_deutsche_reichspartei": "Deutsche Reichspartei", "votes_deutsche_volkspartei": "Deutsche Volkspartei", "votes_fortschrittspartei": "Fortschrittspartei", "votes_liberale_reichspartei": "Liberale Reichspartei", "votes_nationalliberale": "Nationalliberale", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_partikularisten": "Partikularisten", "votes_polen": "Polen", "votes_protest_partei": "Protest Partei", "votes_sozialdemokratische_partei_deutschla": "Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands", "votes_zentrum": "Zentrum"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 382, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 8, "registered_not_positive": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:01:32.999241", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.687, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.8, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.231, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.218, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.687, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 1871, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.8, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 1871, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 1871, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.563, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.391, "year": 1871, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 1871, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 1871, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.231, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.231, "year": 1871, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.218, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.218, "year": 1871, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 1871, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 1871, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.077, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.077, "year": 1871, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 1871, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 382}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ae35df26f27649e59412f3315d94b48a", "name": "Georgia 2012 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 147)", "metadata": {"country": "Georgia", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Georgia lower-house election 2012, CONSTITUENCY level (147 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_christian_democratic_union": "Christian Democratic Union", "votes_free_georgia_party": "Free Georgia Party", "votes_freedom_path_of_zviad_gamsakhurdia": "Freedom - Path of Zviad Gamsakhurdia", "votes_future_georgia": "Future Georgia", "votes_georgian_dream": "Georgian Dream", "votes_georgian_group": "Georgian Group", "votes_georgian_sportsmen_s_community": "Georgian Sportsmen\u0092s Community", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_justice_for_georgia": "Justice for Georgia", "votes_labor_council_of_georgia": "Labor Council of Georgia", "votes_labour_party_of_georgia": "Labour Party of Georgia", "votes_merab_kostava_society": "Merab Kostava Society", "votes_national_democratic_party": "National Democratic Party", "votes_new_rights_party_of_georgia": "New Rights Party of Georgia", "votes_people_s_party": "People\u0092s Party", "votes_public_movement": "Public Movement", "votes_united_national_movement": "United National Movement"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 147, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:01:25.737334", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.974, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.609, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.519, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.361, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.974, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.495, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.465, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.396, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.519, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.519, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.361, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.361, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.431, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.748, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.748, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.568, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.568, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.096, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.096, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Georgian Dream", "winner_candidate": "Giorgi MARGVELASHVILI", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "United National Movement", "margin": 40.38, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "GEO", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 147}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7097a6b61c0948bdb95b7af4ee50f772", "name": "France 2002 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 555)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "France lower-house election 2002 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (555 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_autres_cologistes": "Autres \u00e9cologistes", "votes_chasse_p_che_nature_traditions": "Chasse, P\u00eache, Nature, Traditions", "votes_divers": "Divers", "votes_divers_droite": "Divers droite", "votes_divers_gauche": "Divers gauche", "votes_d_mocratie_lib_rale": "D\u00e9mocratie Lib\u00e9rale", "votes_extr_me_droite": "Extr\u00eame droite", "votes_extr_me_gauche": "Extr\u00eame gauche", "votes_front_national": "Front National", "votes_les_verts": "Les Verts", "votes_ligue_communiste_r_volutionnaire": "Ligue Communiste R\u00e9volutionnaire", "votes_lutte_ouvri_re": "Lutte Ouvri\u00e8re", "votes_mouvement_national_r_publicain": "Mouvement National R\u00e9publicain", "votes_mouvement_pour_la_france": "Mouvement pour la France", "votes_parti_communiste_fran_ais": "Parti Communiste Fran\u00e7ais", "votes_parti_radical_de_gauche": "Parti Radical de Gauche", "votes_parti_socialiste": "Parti Socialiste", "votes_p_le_r_publicain": "P\u00f4le r\u00e9publicain", "votes_rassemblement_pour_la_france_et_l_in": "Rassemblement pour la France et l'Ind\u00e9pendance de l'Europe", "votes_r_gionalistes": "R\u00e9gionalistes", "votes_union_pour_la_d_mocratie_fran_aise": "Union pour la D\u00e9mocratie Fran\u00e7aise", "votes_union_pour_un_mouvement_populaire": "Union pour un Mouvement Populaire"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 555, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:01:20.718379", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.861, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.874, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.801, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.517, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.353, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.088, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.059, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.059, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "RPR", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "FN", "margin": 64.43, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "FRA", "year": 2002, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 555}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b485dced0d4d43a59f295089c3822521", "name": "France 1997 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 555)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 1997, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "France lower-house election 1997 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (555 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_autres_cologistes": "Autres \u00e9cologistes", "votes_divers": "Divers", "votes_divers_udf": "Divers UDF", "votes_divers_droite": "Divers droite", "votes_extr_me_droite": "Extr\u00eame droite", "votes_extr_me_gauche": "Extr\u00eame gauche", "votes_front_national": "Front National", "votes_la_droite_ind_pendante": "La Droite Ind\u00e9pendante", "votes_les_verts": "Les Verts", "votes_mouvement_de_citoyen": "Mouvement de citoyen", "votes_ps_prs": "PS + PRS", "votes_parti_communiste_fran_ais": "Parti Communiste Fran\u00e7ais", "votes_rassemblement_pour_la_r_publique": "Rassemblement pour la R\u00e9publique", "votes_rassemblement_pour_la_r_publique_dis": "Rassemblement pour la R\u00e9publique (dissident)", "votes_union_pour_la_d_mocratie_fran_aise": "Union pour la D\u00e9mocratie Fran\u00e7aise", "votes_union_pour_la_d_mocratie_fran_aise_d": "Union pour la D\u00e9mocratie Fran\u00e7aise (dissident)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 555, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 82}, "n_stations_flagged": 82, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:01:14.621395", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.822, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.858, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.874, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.8, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.353, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.088, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.059, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.059, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 555}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2f9075bcea1d4919803994cf81e8d755", "name": "France 1993 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 555)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 1993, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "France lower-house election 1993 (March), CONSTITUENCY level (555 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_divers": "Divers", "votes_divers_droite": "Divers droite", "votes_divers_gauche": "Divers gauche", "votes_extr_me_droite": "Extr\u00eame droite", "votes_extr_me_gauche": "Extr\u00eame gauche", "votes_front_national": "Front National", "votes_g_n_ration_cologie": "G\u00e9n\u00e9ration \u00c9cologie", "votes_les_verts": "Les Verts", "votes_mouvement_des_radicaux_de_gauche": "Mouvement des radicaux de gauche", "votes_parti_communiste_fran_ais": "Parti Communiste Fran\u00e7ais", "votes_parti_socialiste": "Parti Socialiste", "votes_rassemblement_pour_la_r_publique": "Rassemblement pour la R\u00e9publique", "votes_r_gionalistes": "R\u00e9gionalistes", "votes_union_pour_la_d_mocratie_fran_aise": "Union pour la D\u00e9mocratie Fran\u00e7aise"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 555, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:01:08.546559", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.817, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.863, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.875, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.798, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.332, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.083, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.798, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.059, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.059, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 555}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7e3a04728650433d99e57ec2a5571143", "name": "France 1988 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 555)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 1988, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "France lower-house election 1988 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (555 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_autres_cologistes": "Autres \u00e9cologistes", "votes_divers_droite": "Divers droite", "votes_divers_gauche": "Divers gauche", "votes_extr_me_droite": "Extr\u00eame droite", "votes_extr_me_gauche": "Extr\u00eame gauche", "votes_front_national": "Front National", "votes_mouvement_des_radicaux_de_gauche": "Mouvement des radicaux de gauche", "votes_parti_communiste_fran_ais": "Parti Communiste Fran\u00e7ais", "votes_parti_socialiste": "Parti Socialiste", "votes_rassemblement_pour_la_r_publique": "Rassemblement pour la R\u00e9publique", "votes_r_gionalistes": "R\u00e9gionalistes", "votes_union_pour_la_d_mocratie_fran_aise": "Union pour la D\u00e9mocratie Fran\u00e7aise"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 555, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:01:01.426980", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.823, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.861, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.874, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.8, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.823, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.475, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.346, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.086, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 1988, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 1988, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.059, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.059, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "PS", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "RPR", "margin": 8.04, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "FRA", "year": 1988, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 555}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "90aae9a3d72f4c4ebe418d97be0aaeaa", "name": "France 1981 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 473)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 1981, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "France lower-house election 1981 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (473 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_aujour_hui_l_ecologie": "Aujour'hui l'Ecologie", "votes_autres_cologistes": "Autres \u00e9cologistes", "votes_divers_droite": "Divers droite", "votes_divers_gauche": "Divers gauche", "votes_extr_me_droite": "Extr\u00eame droite", "votes_extr_me_gauche": "Extr\u00eame gauche", "votes_front_national": "Front National", "votes_mouvement_des_radicaux_de_gauche": "Mouvement des radicaux de gauche", "votes_parti_communiste_fran_ais": "Parti Communiste Fran\u00e7ais", "votes_parti_socialiste": "Parti Socialiste", "votes_rpr_udf": "RPR + UDF", "votes_rassemblement_pour_la_r_publique": "Rassemblement pour la R\u00e9publique", "votes_r_gionalistes": "R\u00e9gionalistes", "votes_union_pour_la_d_mocratie_fran_aise": "Union pour la D\u00e9mocratie Fran\u00e7aise"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 473, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 88}, "n_stations_flagged": 88, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:00:55.786470", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.822, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.867, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.862, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.788, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.867, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.425, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.154, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.038, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.788, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 1981, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.725, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.725, "year": 1981, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.939, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.059, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.059, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "PS", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "UDF", "margin": 3.51, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "FRA", "year": 1981, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 473}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c63966197db4463d97efe0ef7b6050ef", "name": "France 1978 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 474)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 1978, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "France lower-house election 1978 (March), CONSTITUENCY level (474 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_action_francaise": "Action Francaise", "votes_autres_cologistes": "Autres \u00e9cologistes", "votes_collectif_ecologie_78": "Collectif Ecologie 78", "votes_divers_droite": "Divers droite", "votes_divers_gauche": "Divers gauche", "votes_extr_me_droite": "Extr\u00eame droite", "votes_extr_me_gauche": "Extr\u00eame gauche", "votes_front_national": "Front National", "votes_gaulopp": "GAULOPP", "votes_ps_mrg": "PS + MRG", "votes_parti_communiste_fran_ais": "Parti Communiste Fran\u00e7ais", "votes_rassemblement_pour_la_r_publique": "Rassemblement pour la R\u00e9publique", "votes_union_pour_la_d_mocratie_fran_aise": "Union pour la D\u00e9mocratie Fran\u00e7aise"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 474, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 216}, "n_stations_flagged": 216, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:00:49.300773", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.824, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.863, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.854, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.773, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.426, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.038, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.773, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.773, "year": 1978, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.715, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 1978, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.059, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.059, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 474}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "541b559ef8c04629b9b94e6541e7e557", "name": "France 1973 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 473)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 1973, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "France lower-house election 1973 (March), CONSTITUENCY level (473 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_cdp_urp": "CDP (URP)", "votes_centre_d_mocratie_et_progr_s": "Centre D\u00e9mocratie et Progr\u00e9s", "votes_divers_gaullistes": "Divers Gaullistes", "votes_divers_r_formateurs": "Divers R\u00e9formateurs", "votes_divers_urp": "Divers URP", "votes_divers_droite": "Divers droite", "votes_divers_gauche": "Divers gauche", "votes_extr_me_droite": "Extr\u00eame droite", "votes_front_national": "Front National", "votes_ligue_communiste_r_volutionnaire": "Ligue Communiste R\u00e9volutionnaire", "votes_lutte_ouvri_re": "Lutte Ouvri\u00e8re", "votes_mouvement_r_formateurs": "Mouvement R\u00e9formateurs", "votes_mouvement_des_radicaux_de_gauche": "Mouvement des radicaux de gauche", "votes_organisation_communiste_internationa": "Organisation Communiste Internationaliste", "votes_parti_communiste_fran_ais": "Parti Communiste Fran\u00e7ais", "votes_parti_socialiste": "Parti Socialiste", "votes_parti_socialiste_unifi": "Parti socialiste unifi\u00e9", "votes_ri_urp": "RI (URP)", "votes_r_publicains_ind_pendants": "R\u00e9publicains ind\u00e9pendants", "votes_udr_urp": "UDR (URP)", "votes_union_des_d_mocrates_pour_la_r_publi": "Union des d\u00e9mocrates pour la R\u00e9publique", "votes_union_des_r_publicains_de_progr_s": "Union des r\u00e9publicains de progr\u00e8s"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 473, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 98}, "n_stations_flagged": 98, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:00:43.233438", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.822, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.869, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.84, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.76, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.869, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.436, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.037, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 1973, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 1973, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.705, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.705, "year": 1973, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.059, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.059, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "RI", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "PS", "margin": 1.61, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "FRA", "year": 1974, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 473}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c747f018c50449f49f2974d41af95a94", "name": "Denmark 1918 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 110)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1918, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1918 (April), CONSTITUENCY level (110 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_det_radikale_venstre": "Det radikale venstre", "votes_konservative_folkeparti": "Konservative folkeparti", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_socialdemokrater": "Socialdemokrater", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 110, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:00:37.106867", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.753, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.876, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.863, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.795, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.753, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.876, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.662, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.255, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.064, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.795, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 1918, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.741, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 1918, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.986, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.026, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 110}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "02d5e41d9d464fd8852b2550207f5423", "name": "Denmark 1915 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 113)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1915, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1915 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (113 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_no_votes_against_uncontested_candida": "'No' votes against uncontested candidate", "votes_det_radikale_venstre": "Det radikale venstre", "votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_socialdemokrater": "Socialdemokrater", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 113, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:00:33.022963", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.742, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.875, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.612, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.557, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.742, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1915, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1915, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1915, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.651, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 1915, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1915, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1915, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.067, "year": 1915, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 1915, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.557, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 1915, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.498, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.498, "year": 1915, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1915, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.986, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 1915, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.026, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 1915, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 1915, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 113}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6f3eb9a0b2574648bb50f5f157df3de0", "name": "Denmark 1913 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 113)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1913, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1913 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (113 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_candidates_against_the_reform_of_the": "Candidates against the reform of the Constitution", "votes_det_radikale_venstre": "Det radikale venstre", "votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_socialdemokrater": "Socialdemokrater", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 113, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 7}, "n_stations_flagged": 7, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:00:28.965344", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.752, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.875, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.614, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.559, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 1913, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1913, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1913, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 1913, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1913, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1913, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.265, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.066, "year": 1913, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 1913, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.559, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 1913, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 1913, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1913, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.986, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 1913, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.026, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 1913, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1913, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 113}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "893e114cb84349c29c8e85fda489214d", "name": "Denmark 1910 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 113)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1910, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1910 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (113 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_det_radikale_venstre": "Det radikale venstre", "votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_socialdemokrater": "Socialdemokrater", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 113, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:00:24.991562", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.755, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.878, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.614, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.559, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.755, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.257, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.064, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 1910, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.559, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 1910, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 1910, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.986, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.026, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 113}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "546dbd5aeee94aa986de85c4c93b5511", "name": "Denmark 1909 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 113)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1909, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1909 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (113 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_no_votes_against_uncontested_candida": "'No' votes against uncontested candidate", "votes_det_radikale_venstre": "Det radikale venstre", "votes_forhandlende_venstre": "Forhandlende Venstre", "votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_socialdemokrater": "Socialdemokrater", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 113, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 22}, "n_stations_flagged": 22, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:00:21.891870", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.755, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.878, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.614, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.559, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.755, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1909, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1909, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1909, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1909, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1909, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1909, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.257, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.064, "year": 1909, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 1909, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.559, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 1909, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 1909, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1909, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.986, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 1909, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.026, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 1909, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1909, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 113}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "52f0acb7fefe43e891c25ebee0256af5", "name": "Denmark 1906 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 113)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1906, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1906 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (113 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_no_votes_against_uncontested_candida": "'No' votes against uncontested candidate", "votes_det_radikale_venstre": "Det radikale venstre", "votes_forhandlende_venstre": "Forhandlende Venstre", "votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_socialdemokrater": "Socialdemokrater", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 113, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 12}, "n_stations_flagged": 12, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:00:17.915762", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.735, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.852, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.614, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.559, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.433, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.108, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 1906, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.559, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 1906, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.48, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.48, "year": 1906, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.986, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.031, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.031, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 113}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6fc2dc74979640208bf14f8ff62cc71e", "name": "Denmark 1903 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 113)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1903, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1903 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (113 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_no_votes_against_uncontested_candida": "'No' votes against uncontested candidate", "votes_c_a": "C + A", "votes_det_radikale_venstre": "Det radikale venstre", "votes_forhandlende_venstre": "Forhandlende Venstre", "votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_socialdemokrater": "Socialdemokrater", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_v_a": "V + A", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 113, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 15}, "n_stations_flagged": 15, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:00:14.784330", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.73, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.85, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.614, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.559, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1903, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1903, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1903, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1903, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1903, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1903, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.435, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.109, "year": 1903, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 1903, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.559, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 1903, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.48, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.48, "year": 1903, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1903, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.986, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 1903, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.031, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.031, "year": 1903, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1903, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 113}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e6c3836a3210468abaaad43493b81dff", "name": "Denmark 1901 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 113)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1901, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1901 (April), CONSTITUENCY level (113 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_no_votes_against_uncontested_candida": "'No' votes against uncontested candidate", "votes_agrarians": "Agrarians", "votes_forhandlende_venstre": "Forhandlende Venstre", "votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_socialdemokrater": "Socialdemokrater", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_v_a": "V + A", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 113, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 12}, "n_stations_flagged": 12, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:00:09.658267", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.732, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.846, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.479, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.456, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.732, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1901, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1901, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1901, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1901, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1901, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1901, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.11, "year": 1901, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 1901, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 1901, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.391, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.391, "year": 1901, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1901, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.986, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 1901, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.031, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.031, "year": 1901, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1901, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 113}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "259d3dcc2e9a4ad0ac9e8d5bf2c5e4a1", "name": "Denmark 1898 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 113)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1898, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1898 (April), CONSTITUENCY level (113 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_no_votes_against_uncontested_candida": "'No' votes against uncontested candidate", "votes_agrarians": "Agrarians", "votes_forhandlende_venstre": "Forhandlende Venstre", "votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_socialdemokrater": "Socialdemokrater", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 113, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-06-13T19:00:05.614307", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.644, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.818, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.369, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.376, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.644, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1898, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1898, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1898, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.452, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 1898, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1898, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1898, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.369, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.369, "year": 1898, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.376, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.376, "year": 1898, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.32, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.32, "year": 1898, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1898, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.985, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1898, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.028, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1898, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1898, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 113}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8b4aa15a07094a94b6c19bce4f17eb4f", "name": "Denmark 1895 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 113)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1895, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1895 (April), CONSTITUENCY level (113 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_no_votes_against_uncontested_candida": "'No' votes against uncontested candidate", "votes_forhandlende_venstre": "Forhandlende Venstre", "votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_socialdemokrater": "Socialdemokrater", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 113, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:59:59.540379", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.675, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.813, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.369, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.375, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.675, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 1895, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1895, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1895, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.473, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 1895, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1895, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1895, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.369, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.369, "year": 1895, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.375, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.375, "year": 1895, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 1895, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.985, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1895, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.028, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1895, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1895, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 113}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bf3197dc246e416899d3fa8edf16cd15", "name": "Denmark 1892 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 101)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1892, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1892 (April), CONSTITUENCY level (101 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_no_votes_against_uncontested_candida": "'No' votes against uncontested candidate", "votes_forhandlende_venstre": "Forhandlende Venstre", "votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_socialdemokrater": "Socialdemokrater", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 101, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:59:51.416946", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.633, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.806, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.333, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.351, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.806, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.965, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 1892, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.333, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.333, "year": 1892, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.351, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 1892, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.985, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.028, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 1892, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 101}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "497af272a4dc4acebe318b2a58a08500", "name": "Denmark 1890 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 101)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1890, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1890 (January), CONSTITUENCY level (101 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_no_votes_against_uncontested_candida": "'No' votes against uncontested candidate", "votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_socialdemokrater": "Socialdemokrater", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 101, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 25}, "n_stations_flagged": 25, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:59:47.469393", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.667, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.817, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.332, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.351, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.667, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1890, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1890, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 1890, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.458, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 1890, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1890, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1890, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.332, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.332, "year": 1890, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.351, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 1890, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 1890, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.985, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1890, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.028, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1890, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 1890, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 101}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ed9fdae7a2a248879ee2cf912fdb260a", "name": "Denmark 1887 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 101)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1887, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1887 (January), CONSTITUENCY level (101 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_no_votes_against_uncontested_candida": "'No' votes against uncontested candidate", "votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_socialdemokrater": "Socialdemokrater", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 101, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:59:44.433622", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.662, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.823, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.333, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.351, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.662, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 1887, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.823, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1887, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 1887, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.47, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 1887, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1887, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1887, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.333, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.333, "year": 1887, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.351, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 1887, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 1887, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.985, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1887, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.028, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1887, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 1887, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 101}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9e4d9c874c77485092cb3e9545d47323", "name": "Denmark 1884 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 101)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1884, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1884 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (101 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_no_votes_against_uncontested_candida": "'No' votes against uncontested candidate", "votes_forenede_venstre": "Forenede Venstre", "votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_socialdemokrater": "Socialdemokrater", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 101, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:59:40.433406", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.658, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.822, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.36, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.369, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.658, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.968, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 1884, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.451, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.36, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.36, "year": 1884, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.369, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.369, "year": 1884, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.921, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.985, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.028, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.939, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 101}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "de224bb7b8fa49bfa897d9c517b4eba8", "name": "Denmark 1881 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 101)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1881, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1881 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (101 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_no_votes_against_uncontested_candida": "'No' votes against uncontested candidate", "votes_forenede_venstre": "Forenede Venstre", "votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_socialdemokrater": "Socialdemokrater", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 101, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 22}, "n_stations_flagged": 22, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:59:34.272813", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.667, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.825, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.361, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.37, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.667, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1881, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1881, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.952, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 1881, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.445, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 1881, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1881, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1881, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.361, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.361, "year": 1881, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.37, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 1881, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.921, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 1881, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.985, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1881, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.028, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1881, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.939, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1881, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 101}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "72bf7a6ebdbd442bb7e217eac093bf5e", "name": "Denmark 1879 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 101)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1879, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1879 (January), CONSTITUENCY level (101 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_no_votes_against_uncontested_candida": "'No' votes against uncontested candidate", "votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_socialdemokrater": "Socialdemokrater", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 101, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 19}, "n_stations_flagged": 19, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:59:26.162772", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.665, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.822, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.36, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.37, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.665, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1879, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1879, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 1879, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 1879, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1879, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1879, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.36, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.36, "year": 1879, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.37, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 1879, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.917, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1879, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.985, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1879, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.028, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1879, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.939, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1879, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 101}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "008432ff6ca840e9b8958dcab22ba201", "name": "Denmark 1876 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 101)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1876, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1876 (April), CONSTITUENCY level (101 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_no_votes_against_uncontested_candida": "'No' votes against uncontested candidate", "votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_socialdemokrater": "Socialdemokrater", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 101, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:59:23.165483", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.668, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.82, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.362, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.37, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.668, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1876, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1876, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.968, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 1876, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.476, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 1876, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1876, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1876, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.362, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.362, "year": 1876, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.37, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 1876, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.917, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1876, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.985, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1876, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.028, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1876, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.939, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1876, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 101}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0e7c8fe6507d47e785128e5ed777ba61", "name": "Denmark 1873 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 101)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1873, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1873 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (101 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_no_votes_against_uncontested_candida": "'No' votes against uncontested candidate", "votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_socialdemokrater": "Socialdemokrater", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 101, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 15}, "n_stations_flagged": 15, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:59:19.969411", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.666, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.812, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.365, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.372, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1873, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.812, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1873, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1873, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.477, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 1873, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1873, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1873, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.365, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.365, "year": 1873, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.372, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 1873, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.917, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1873, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.985, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1873, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.028, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1873, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.939, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1873, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 101}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f531107c3c104fb58e026d9a1b0a767e", "name": "Denmark 1872 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 101)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1872, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1872 (September), CONSTITUENCY level (101 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_no_votes_against_uncontested_candida": "'No' votes against uncontested candidate", "votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_socialdemokrater": "Socialdemokrater", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 101, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 26}, "n_stations_flagged": 26, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:59:16.965290", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.674, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.808, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.347, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.361, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.674, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.808, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.455, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.347, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.347, "year": 1872, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.361, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.361, "year": 1872, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.985, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.028, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 101}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b379b23ce9a843ec9c110cb3e03d673d", "name": "Denmark 1869 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 101)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1869, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1869 (September), CONSTITUENCY level (101 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_no_votes_against_uncontested_candida": "'No' votes against uncontested candidate", "votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 101, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 17}, "n_stations_flagged": 17, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:59:12.856576", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.661, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.818, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.363, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 1869, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1869, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1869, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.466, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1869, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1869, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1869, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.363, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 1869, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 1869, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.916, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1869, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.985, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1869, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.028, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1869, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 1869, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 101}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c34a9a9e4f034e3e9544002d26c6cf76", "name": "Denmark 1866 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 101)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1866, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1866 (December), CONSTITUENCY level (101 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 101, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 101, "cast_valid_mismatch": 17, "cast_gt_registered": 44}, "n_stations_flagged": 101, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:59:08.945622", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.663, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.819, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.363, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.363, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 1866, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 1866, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.916, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.985, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.028, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 101}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "eaf5a1f7a7234019afcd26b95b664f8c", "name": "Denmark 1865 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 101)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1865, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1865 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (101 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 101, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 58, "registered_not_positive": 101, "cast_valid_mismatch": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 101, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:59:05.902146", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.673, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.812, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.363, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 1865, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.812, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1865, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1865, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.48, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 1865, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1865, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1865, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.363, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 1865, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 1865, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.916, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1865, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.985, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1865, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.028, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1865, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 1865, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 101}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3cc33053a0d94c5a899273dbc7905c36", "name": "Denmark 1864 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 101)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1864, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1864 (March), CONSTITUENCY level (101 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 101, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 44, "registered_not_positive": 101, "cast_valid_mismatch": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 101, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:59:02.855484", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.673, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.812, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.363, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 1864, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.812, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1864, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1864, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.48, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 1864, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1864, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1864, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.363, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 1864, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 1864, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.916, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1864, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.985, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1864, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.028, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1864, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 1864, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 101}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9fb9a680490f4b568482c44270dd5a5a", "name": "Denmark 1861 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 100)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1861, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1861 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (100 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 100, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1, "cast_valid_mismatch": 9, "registered_not_positive": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 11, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:55.775716", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.648, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.815, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.363, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.37, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 1861, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1861, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1861, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.445, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 1861, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1861, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1861, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.363, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 1861, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.37, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 1861, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.916, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1861, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.985, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1861, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.028, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1861, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 1861, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 100}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cd7b4c5706be479298bb2e883589215d", "name": "Denmark 1858 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 100)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1858, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1858 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (100 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 100, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 100, "cast_valid_mismatch": 10, "cast_gt_registered": 51}, "n_stations_flagged": 100, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:52.686716", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.664, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.817, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.363, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.37, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.664, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.363, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 1858, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.37, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 1858, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.916, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.985, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.028, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 100}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "35c1901b12034c8983c458304eb648a3", "name": "Denmark 1855 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 100)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1855, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1855 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (100 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 100, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 100, "cast_valid_mismatch": 2, "cast_gt_registered": 13}, "n_stations_flagged": 100, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:49.664213", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.663, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.811, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.363, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.37, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1855, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1855, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1855, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.459, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 1855, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1855, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1855, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.363, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 1855, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.37, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 1855, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 1855, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.985, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1855, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.028, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1855, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 1855, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 100}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8694650ab16247cdb80d5fd7d578c6ca", "name": "Denmark 1854 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 100)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1854, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1854 (December), CONSTITUENCY level (100 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 100, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 20, "registered_not_positive": 100, "cast_valid_mismatch": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 100, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:46.533936", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.663, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.811, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.353, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.363, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.459, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.353, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.353, "year": 1854, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.363, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 1854, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.976, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.028, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 100}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3a043f87dc934107be6dcaad41403f02", "name": "Denmark 1853 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 100)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1853, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1853 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (100 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_no_votes_against_uncontested_candida": "'No' votes against uncontested candidate", "votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 100, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:44.785927", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.669, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.822, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.354, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.363, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1853, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1853, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 1853, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.45, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 1853, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1853, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1853, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.354, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.354, "year": 1853, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.363, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 1853, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 1853, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.976, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1853, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.028, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1853, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 1853, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 100}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cc0f226d71f748f884f7d9391c25a1d9", "name": "Denmark 1852 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 100)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1852, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1852 (August), CONSTITUENCY level (100 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_no_votes_against_uncontested_candida": "'No' votes against uncontested candidate", "votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 100, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 15}, "n_stations_flagged": 15, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:42.780368", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.669, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.822, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.361, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.37, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.45, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.361, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.361, "year": 1852, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.37, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 1852, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.986, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.028, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.939, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 100}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5c9e1a5fa3044eacbe90e455b94cdb84", "name": "Denmark 1849 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 100)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1849, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark lower-house election 1849 (December), CONSTITUENCY level (100 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_h_jre": "H\u00f8jre", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 100, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 17}, "n_stations_flagged": 17, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:41.889139", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.663, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.82, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.362, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.368, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1849, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1849, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1849, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.472, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 1849, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1849, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1849, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.362, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.362, "year": 1849, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.368, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 1849, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 1849, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.986, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 1849, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.028, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.028, "year": 1849, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.939, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1849, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 100}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "aad286adac8a40d6b7ed0a16c02f3d9a", "name": "Canada 2011 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 308)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 2011, CONSTITUENCY level (308 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_animal_alliance_environment_voters": "animal alliance/environment voters", "votes_bloc_qu_b_cois": "bloc qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois", "votes_canadian_action_party": "canadian action party", "votes_christian_heritage_party_of_canada": "christian heritage party of canada", "votes_communist": "communist", "votes_conservative": "conservative", "votes_first_peoples_national_party_of_cana": "first peoples national party of canada", "votes_green_party": "green party", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_liberal": "liberal", "votes_libertarian": "libertarian", "votes_marxist_leninist": "marxist-leninist", "votes_new_democratic_party": "new democratic party", "votes_pirate_party": "pirate party", "votes_progressive_canadian_party": "progressive canadian party", "votes_radical_marijuana": "radical marijuana", "votes_rhinoceros": "rhinoceros", "votes_united_party": "united party", "votes_western_block_party": "western block party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 308, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 308, "registered_not_positive": 308}, "n_stations_flagged": 308, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:40.421795", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.59, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.811, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.74, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.623, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.747, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.676, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 308}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "601a521b89d94ccd9c3ff6712bdd699c", "name": "Canada 2008 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 308)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 2008 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (308 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_animal_alliance_environment_voters_p": "Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party of Canada", "votes_bloc_qu_b_cois": "Bloc Qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois", "votes_canadian_action_party": "Canadian Action Party", "votes_christian_heritage_party_of_canada": "Christian Heritage Party of Canada", "votes_communist_party_of_canada": "Communist Party of Canada", "votes_conservative_party_of_canada": "Conservative Party of Canada", "votes_first_peoples_national_party_of_cana": "First Peoples National Party of Canada", "votes_green_party_of_canada": "Green Party of Canada", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_libertarian_party_of_canada": "Libertarian Party of Canada", "votes_marijuana_party": "Marijuana Party", "votes_marxist_leninist_party": "Marxist-Leninist Party", "votes_new_democratic_party": "New Democratic Party", "votes_newfoundland_and_labrador_first_part": "Newfoundland and Labrador First Party", "votes_people_s_political_power_party_of_ca": "People's Political Power Party of Canada", "votes_progressive_canadian_party": "Progressive Canadian Party", "votes_western_block_party": "Western Block Party", "votes_work_less_party": "Work Less Party", "votes_neorhino_ca": "neorhino.ca"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 308, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 308, "cast_gt_registered": 308}, "n_stations_flagged": 308, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:38.855963", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.873, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.945, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.827, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.753, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.302, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.74, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.753, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.753, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.703, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.033, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.033, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 308}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bbbe60cc162149bfa750967efc3f2abe", "name": "Canada 2006 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 308)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 2006 (January), CONSTITUENCY level (308 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_animal_alliance_environment_voters_p": "Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party of Canada", "votes_bloc_qu_b_cois": "Bloc Qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois", "votes_canadian_action_party": "Canadian Action Party", "votes_christian_heritage_party_of_canada": "Christian Heritage Party of Canada", "votes_communist_party_of_canada": "Communist Party of Canada", "votes_conservative_party_of_canada": "Conservative Party of Canada", "votes_first_peoples_national_party_of_cana": "First Peoples National Party of Canada", "votes_green_party_of_canada": "Green Party of Canada", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_libertarian_party_of_canada": "Libertarian Party of Canada", "votes_marijuana_party": "Marijuana Party", "votes_marxist_leninist_party": "Marxist-Leninist Party", "votes_new_democratic_party": "New Democratic Party", "votes_progressive_canadian_party": "Progressive Canadian Party", "votes_western_block_party": "Western Block Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 308, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 308, "cast_gt_registered": 308}, "n_stations_flagged": 308, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:33.251395", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.941, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.83, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.757, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.401, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.745, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.035, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 308}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bb1b58c286764b6b9d209aa3e0609b04", "name": "Canada 2004 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 308)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 2004 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (308 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bloc_qu_b_cois": "Bloc Qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois", "votes_canadian_action_party": "Canadian Action Party", "votes_christian_heritage_party_of_canada": "Christian Heritage Party of Canada", "votes_communist_party_of_canada": "Communist Party of Canada", "votes_conservative_party_of_canada": "Conservative Party of Canada", "votes_green_party_of_canada": "Green Party of Canada", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_libertarian_party_of_canada": "Libertarian Party of Canada", "votes_marijuana_party": "Marijuana Party", "votes_marxist_leninist_party": "Marxist-Leninist Party", "votes_new_democratic_party": "New Democratic Party", "votes_progressive_canadian_party": "Progressive Canadian Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 308, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 308, "cast_gt_registered": 308}, "n_stations_flagged": 308, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:31.585874", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.755, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.888, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.825, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.755, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.596, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.678, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.702, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.035, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 308}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e1c7188cce5c4dd7bc54b86265bbf066", "name": "Canada 2000 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 301)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2000, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 2000 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (301 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bloc_qu_b_cois": "Bloc Qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois", "votes_canadian_action_party": "Canadian Action Party", "votes_canadian_alliance": "Canadian Alliance", "votes_communist_party_of_canada": "Communist Party of Canada", "votes_green_party_of_canada": "Green Party of Canada", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_marijuana_party": "Marijuana Party", "votes_marxist_leninist_party": "Marxist-Leninist Party", "votes_natural_law_party_of_canada": "Natural Law Party of Canada", "votes_new_democratic_party": "New Democratic Party", "votes_progressive_conservative": "Progressive Conservative"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 301, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 301, "registered_not_positive": 301}, "n_stations_flagged": 301, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:29.508027", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.876, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.88, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.836, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.756, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.876, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.611, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.716, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.679, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.035, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 301}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "418370970d5b4cd897a0ff5f916992f8", "name": "Canada 1997 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 301)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1997, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1997 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (301 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bloc_qu_b_cois": "Bloc Qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois", "votes_canadian_action_party": "Canadian Action Party", "votes_christian_heritage_party_of_canada": "Christian Heritage Party of Canada", "votes_green_party_of_canada": "Green Party of Canada", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_marxist_leninist_party": "Marxist-Leninist Party", "votes_natural_law_party_of_canada": "Natural Law Party of Canada", "votes_new_democratic_party": "New Democratic Party", "votes_progressive_conservative": "Progressive Conservative", "votes_reform_party_of_canada": "Reform Party of Canada"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 301, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 301, "cast_gt_registered": 301}, "n_stations_flagged": 301, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:27.900068", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.712, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.882, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.84, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.76, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.712, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.882, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.608, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.348, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.715, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.035, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 301}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7ca80dd5d1a24758ad5ae438e97e7764", "name": "Canada 1993 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 295)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1993, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1993 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (295 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_abolitionist_party_of_canada": "Abolitionist Party of Canada", "votes_bloc_qu_b_cois": "Bloc Qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois", "votes_canada_party": "Canada Party", "votes_christian_heritage_party_of_canada": "Christian Heritage Party of Canada", "votes_green_party_of_canada": "Green Party of Canada", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_libertarian_party_of_canada": "Libertarian Party of Canada", "votes_marxist_leninist_party": "Marxist-Leninist Party", "votes_national_party_of_canada": "National Party of Canada", "votes_nationalist": "Nationalist", "votes_natural_law_party_of_canada": "Natural Law Party of Canada", "votes_new_democratic_party": "New Democratic Party", "votes_party_for_the_commonwealth_of_canada": "Party for the Commonwealth of Canada", "votes_progressive_conservative": "Progressive Conservative", "votes_reform_party_of_canada": "Reform Party of Canada"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 295, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 295, "registered_not_positive": 295}, "n_stations_flagged": 295, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:26.503541", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.884, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.886, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.832, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.752, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.884, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.034, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.508, "year": 1993, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.707, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.707, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.033, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.033, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 295}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "77d6407a3b264ed685fcd5774299cb4b", "name": "Canada 1988 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 295)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1988, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1988 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (295 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_christian_heritage_party_of_canada": "Christian Heritage Party of Canada", "votes_co_operative_commonwealth_federation": "Co-operative Commonwealth Federation", "votes_communist_party_of_canada": "Communist Party of Canada", "votes_confederation_of_regions_western_par": "Confederation of Regions Western Party", "votes_green_party_of_canada": "Green Party of Canada", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_libertarian_party_of_canada": "Libertarian Party of Canada", "votes_new_democratic_party": "New Democratic Party", "votes_parti_rhinoc_ros": "Parti Rhinoc\u00e9ros", "votes_party_for_the_commonwealth_of_canada": "Party for the Commonwealth of Canada", "votes_progressive_conservative": "Progressive Conservative", "votes_reform_party_of_canada": "Reform Party of Canada", "votes_social_credit_party_of_canada": "Social Credit Party of Canada"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 295, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 295, "registered_not_positive": 295}, "n_stations_flagged": 295, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:24.878918", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.718, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.881, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.835, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.757, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.718, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.492, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 1988, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 1988, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 1988, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.709, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 1988, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.033, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.033, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 295}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "050ab6b8a2d049e2aa726895801e31c3", "name": "Canada 1984 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 282)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1984, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1984 (September), CONSTITUENCY level (282 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_communist_party_of_canada": "Communist Party of Canada", "votes_confederation_of_regions_western_par": "Confederation of Regions Western Party", "votes_green_party_of_canada": "Green Party of Canada", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_libertarian_party_of_canada": "Libertarian Party of Canada", "votes_new_democratic_party": "New Democratic Party", "votes_parti_nationaliste_du_qu_bec": "Parti Nationaliste du Qu\u00e9bec", "votes_parti_rhinoc_ros": "Parti Rhinoc\u00e9ros", "votes_party_for_the_commonwealth_of_canada": "Party for the Commonwealth of Canada", "votes_progressive_conservative": "Progressive Conservative", "votes_social_credit_party_of_canada": "Social Credit Party of Canada"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 282, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 282, "cast_gt_registered": 282}, "n_stations_flagged": 282, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:23.380666", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.718, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.885, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.834, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.757, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.718, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.502, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.442, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.36, "year": 1984, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 1984, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 1984, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 1984, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.04, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.04, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 282}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fb5d3d88ce9343eba297434f27ebd66f", "name": "Canada 1980 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 282)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1980, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1980 (February), CONSTITUENCY level (282 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_communist_party_of_canada": "Communist Party of Canada", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_libertarian_party_of_canada": "Libertarian Party of Canada", "votes_marxist_leninist_party": "Marxist-Leninist Party", "votes_new_democratic_party": "New Democratic Party", "votes_parti_rhinoc_ros": "Parti Rhinoc\u00e9ros", "votes_progressive_conservative": "Progressive Conservative", "votes_social_credit_party_of_canada": "Social Credit Party of Canada", "votes_union_populaire": "Union Populaire"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 282, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 282, "registered_not_positive": 282}, "n_stations_flagged": 282, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:22.023967", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.717, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.882, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.829, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.747, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.882, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.445, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.361, "year": 1980, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.747, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.747, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.691, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 1980, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.924, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.04, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.04, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 282}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e02f3af8086c4063acd043c86efda592", "name": "Canada 1979 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 282)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1979, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1979 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (282 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_communist_party_of_canada": "Communist Party of Canada", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_libertarian_party_of_canada": "Libertarian Party of Canada", "votes_marxist_leninist_party": "Marxist-Leninist Party", "votes_new_democratic_party": "New Democratic Party", "votes_parti_rhinoc_ros": "Parti Rhinoc\u00e9ros", "votes_progressive_conservative": "Progressive Conservative", "votes_social_credit_party_of_canada": "Social Credit Party of Canada", "votes_union_populaire": "Union Populaire"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 282, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 282, "cast_gt_registered": 282}, "n_stations_flagged": 282, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:20.644383", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.717, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.882, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.828, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.746, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.882, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.445, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.361, "year": 1979, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 1979, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.746, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 1979, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.678, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.678, "year": 1979, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.043, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 282}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "54ed38694e0043bba9b83257e7dcf16d", "name": "Canada 1974 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 264)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1974, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1974 (July), CONSTITUENCY level (264 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_communist_party_of_canada": "Communist Party of Canada", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_marxist_leninist_party": "Marxist-Leninist Party", "votes_new_democratic_party": "New Democratic Party", "votes_progressive_conservative": "Progressive Conservative", "votes_social_credit_party_of_canada": "Social Credit Party of Canada"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 264, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 264, "cast_gt_registered": 264}, "n_stations_flagged": 264, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:19.069646", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.639, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.876, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.823, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.741, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.876, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.488, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.655, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.431, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.358, "year": 1974, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.823, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 1974, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.741, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 1974, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.043, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 264}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "351a330140524d57ada596af01a9055b", "name": "Canada 1972 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 264)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1972, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1972 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (264 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_new_democratic_party": "New Democratic Party", "votes_parti_rhinoc_ros": "Parti Rhinoc\u00e9ros", "votes_progressive_conservative": "Progressive Conservative", "votes_social_credit_party_of_canada": "Social Credit Party of Canada"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 264, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 264, "cast_gt_registered": 264}, "n_stations_flagged": 264, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:17.558595", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.655, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.891, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.828, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.744, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.655, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.49, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.655, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.483, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 1972, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.744, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.689, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 1972, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.924, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.043, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 264}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "355900c3688a415da2c39041758267d2", "name": "Canada 1968 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 264)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1968, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1968 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (264 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_communist_party_of_canada": "Communist Party of Canada", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_esprit_social": "Esprit social", "votes_franc_lib": "Franc Lib", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_conservative": "Independent Conservative", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_independent_progressive_conservative": "Independent Progressive Conservative", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_labour": "Liberal Labour", "votes_national_socialist": "National Socialist", "votes_new_canada_party": "New Canada Party", "votes_new_democratic_party": "New Democratic Party", "votes_parti_rhinoc_ros": "Parti Rhinoc\u00e9ros", "votes_parti_de_la_d_mocratisation_conomiqu": "Parti de la D\u00e9mocratisation \u00e9conomique", "votes_progressive_conservative": "Progressive Conservative", "votes_ralliement_cr_ditiste": "Ralliement Cr\u00e9ditiste", "votes_reform_party_of_canada": "Reform Party of Canada", "votes_republican": "Republican", "votes_social_credit_party_of_canada": "Social Credit Party of Canada", "votes_socialist_labour": "Socialist Labour"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 264, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 264, "registered_not_positive": 264}, "n_stations_flagged": 264, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:16.260838", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.637, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.883, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.814, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.729, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.637, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.859, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.481, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 1968, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.384, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 1968, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.492, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 1968, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 1968, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.729, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 1968, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.674, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 1968, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.037, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.037, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 264}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "824bab80527244828237442b819aafd4", "name": "Canada 1965 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 261)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1965, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1965 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (261 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_communist_party_of_canada": "Communist Party of Canada", "votes_droit_vital_personnel": "Droit vital personnel", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_conservative": "Independent Conservative", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_independent_progressive_conservative": "Independent Progressive Conservative", "votes_independent_social_credit": "Independent Social Credit", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_new_canada_party": "New Canada Party", "votes_new_democratic_party": "New Democratic Party", "votes_ouvrier_ind_pendent": "Ouvrier ind\u00e9pendent", "votes_parti_rhinoc_ros": "Parti Rhinoc\u00e9ros", "votes_progressive_conservative": "Progressive Conservative", "votes_progressive_workers_movement": "Progressive Workers Movement", "votes_ralliement_cr_ditiste": "Ralliement Cr\u00e9ditiste", "votes_republican_party": "Republican Party", "votes_social_credit_party_of_canada": "Social Credit Party of Canada", "votes_socialist_labour": "Socialist Labour"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 261, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 261, "cast_gt_registered": 261}, "n_stations_flagged": 261, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:14.597634", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.646, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.886, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.816, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.732, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.488, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.384, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.482, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 1965, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.816, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.64, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.64, "year": 1965, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 261}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "22e7734efeac4119a6d2f6a315de8a2d", "name": "Canada 1963 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 261)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1963, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1963 (April), CONSTITUENCY level (261 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_candidat_lib_ral_des_lecteurs": "Candidat lib\u00e9ral des \u00e9lecteurs", "votes_communist_party_of_canada": "Communist Party of Canada", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_conservative": "Independent Conservative", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_independent_progressive_conservative": "Independent Progressive Conservative", "votes_independent_social_credit": "Independent Social Credit", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_labour": "Liberal Labour", "votes_nationalist": "Nationalist", "votes_new_democratic_party": "New Democratic Party", "votes_ouvrier_ind_pendent": "Ouvrier ind\u00e9pendent", "votes_progressive_conservative": "Progressive Conservative", "votes_social_credit_party_of_canada": "Social Credit Party of Canada", "votes_socialist_labour": "Socialist Labour"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 261, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 261, "cast_gt_registered": 261}, "n_stations_flagged": 261, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:13.079071", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.64, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.883, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.816, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.733, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.64, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 1963, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1963, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1963, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.477, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 1963, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 1963, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.384, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 1963, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.493, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 1963, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.816, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 1963, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1963, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.638, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 1963, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 1963, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1963, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 1963, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1963, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 261}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e4f61dbf70a244dcb514abbdca74c407", "name": "Canada 1962 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 261)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1962, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1962 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (261 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_canadian_party": "All Canadian Party", "votes_candidat_lib_ral_des_lecteurs": "Candidat lib\u00e9ral des \u00e9lecteurs", "votes_capital_familial": "Capital  familial", "votes_communist_party_of_canada": "Communist Party of Canada", "votes_cooperative_builders_of_canada": "Cooperative Builders of Canada", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_independent_progressive_conservative": "Independent Progressive Conservative", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_labour": "Liberal Labour", "votes_new_democratic_party": "New Democratic Party", "votes_ouvrier_ind_pendent": "Ouvrier ind\u00e9pendent", "votes_progressive_conservative": "Progressive Conservative", "votes_social_credit_party_of_canada": "Social Credit Party of Canada", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 261, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 261, "cast_gt_registered": 261}, "n_stations_flagged": 261, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:11.499007", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.64, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.883, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.81, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.721, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.64, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.477, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 1962, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.384, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 1962, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.493, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 1962, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 1962, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 1962, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.626, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.626, "year": 1962, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 261}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "48a98becf06a431e8e94b2c434fed55e", "name": "Canada 1958 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 261)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1958, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1958 (March), CONSTITUENCY level (261 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_candidats_des_lecteurs": "Candidats des \u00e9lecteurs", "votes_capital_familial": "Capital  familial", "votes_co_operative_commonwealth_federation": "Co-operative Commonwealth Federation", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_conservative": "Independent Conservative", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_independent_progressive_conservative": "Independent Progressive Conservative", "votes_independent_social_credit": "Independent Social Credit", "votes_labour_progressive_party": "Labour Progressive Party", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_labour": "Liberal Labour", "votes_parti_ouvrier_canadien": "Parti ouvrier canadien", "votes_progressive_conservative": "Progressive Conservative", "votes_radical_chr_tien": "Radical chr\u00e9tien", "votes_social_credit_party_of_canada": "Social Credit Party of Canada", "votes_socialist": "Socialist"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 261, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 261, "registered_not_positive": 261}, "n_stations_flagged": 261, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:09.895938", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.649, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.881, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.754, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.666, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.649, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 1958, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1958, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1958, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.045, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 1958, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 1958, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.384, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 1958, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.378, "year": 1958, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.754, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 1958, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.666, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 1958, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.546, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.546, "year": 1958, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 1958, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1958, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 1958, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 1958, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 261}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "10baf8e185a04a96989e6978677a932c", "name": "Canada 1957 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 261)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1957, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1957 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (261 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_canadian_democrat": "Canadian Democrat", "votes_candidats_des_lecteurs": "Candidats des \u00e9lecteurs", "votes_capital_familial": "Capital  familial", "votes_co_operative_commonwealth_federation": "Co-operative Commonwealth Federation", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_independent_progressive_conservative": "Independent Progressive Conservative", "votes_independent_social_credit": "Independent Social Credit", "votes_labour_progressive_party": "Labour Progressive Party", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_conservative_coalition": "Liberal Conservative Coalition", "votes_liberal_labour": "Liberal Labour", "votes_national_credit_control": "National Credit Control", "votes_progressive_conservative": "Progressive Conservative", "votes_social_credit_party_of_canada": "Social Credit Party of Canada"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 261, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 261, "cast_gt_registered": 260}, "n_stations_flagged": 261, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:08.388259", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.649, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.881, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.754, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.663, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.649, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.045, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 1957, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 1957, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.384, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 1957, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.378, "year": 1957, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.754, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 1957, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.663, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.663, "year": 1957, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.533, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.533, "year": 1957, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 1957, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 261}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3c67b818cc944ffb8abbd85042a74895", "name": "Canada 1953 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 260)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1953, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1953 (August), CONSTITUENCY level (260 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anti_communist": "Anti-Communist", "votes_christian_liberal": "Christian Liberal", "votes_co_operative_commonwealth_federation": "Co-operative Commonwealth Federation", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_independent_progressive_conservative": "Independent Progressive Conservative", "votes_independent_social_credit": "Independent Social Credit", "votes_labour_progressive_party": "Labour Progressive Party", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_labour": "Liberal Labour", "votes_liberal_progressive": "Liberal Progressive", "votes_locataire_candidat": "Locataire (candidat)", "votes_nationalist": "Nationalist", "votes_progressive_conservative": "Progressive Conservative", "votes_social_credit_party_of_canada": "Social Credit Party of Canada", "votes_socialist_labour": "Socialist Labour"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 260, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 260, "cast_gt_registered": 258}, "n_stations_flagged": 260, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:06.908840", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.651, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.888, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.748, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.658, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.651, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.037, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 1953, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 1953, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.384, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 1953, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 1953, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.748, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.748, "year": 1953, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.658, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 1953, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 1953, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 260}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5e7b98d0eac94dd4b680dd9ab5e0abaa", "name": "Canada 1949 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 257)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1949, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1949 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (257 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_co_operative_commonwealth_federation": "Co-operative Commonwealth Federation", "votes_farmer_labour": "Farmer Labour", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_independent_progressive_conservative": "Independent Progressive Conservative", "votes_independent_social_credit": "Independent Social Credit", "votes_labour": "Labour", "votes_labour_progressive_party": "Labour Progressive Party", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_labour": "Liberal Labour", "votes_liberal_progressive": "Liberal Progressive", "votes_nationalist": "Nationalist", "votes_progressive_conservative": "Progressive Conservative", "votes_social_credit_party_of_canada": "Social Credit Party of Canada", "votes_socialist_labour": "Socialist Labour", "votes_union_of_electors": "Union of Electors", "votes_unit_nationale": "Unit\u00e9 nationale"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 257, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 257, "registered_not_positive": 257}, "n_stations_flagged": 257, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:05.355313", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.649, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.884, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.716, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.628, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.649, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.884, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.859, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.038, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 1949, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 1949, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.384, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 1949, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.489, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 1949, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.716, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 1949, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.628, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 1949, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.502, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.502, "year": 1949, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.069, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.069, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 257}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "03155442bab74f14870aecf81313f598", "name": "Canada 1945 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 240)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1945, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1945 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (240 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bloc_populaire_canadien": "Bloc populaire canadien", "votes_co_operative_commonwealth_federation": "Co-operative Commonwealth Federation", "votes_democrat": "Democrat", "votes_farmer_labour": "Farmer Labour", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_co_operative_commonwealt": "Independent Co-operative Commonwealth Federation", "votes_independent_conservative": "Independent Conservative", "votes_independent_labor": "Independent Labor", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_independent_progressive_conservative": "Independent Progressive Conservative", "votes_labour": "Labour", "votes_labour_progressive_party": "Labour Progressive Party", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_labour": "Liberal Labour", "votes_liberal_progressive": "Liberal Progressive", "votes_national_government": "National Government", "votes_progressive_conservative": "Progressive Conservative", "votes_social_credit_party_of_canada": "Social Credit Party of Canada", "votes_socialist_labour": "Socialist Labour", "votes_trades_union": "Trades Union", "votes_union_of_electors": "Union of Electors", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 240, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 240, "registered_not_positive": 240}, "n_stations_flagged": 240, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:03.851914", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.643, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.876, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.652, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.559, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.643, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1945, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.876, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1945, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.862, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1945, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 1945, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 1945, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.384, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 1945, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.488, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 1945, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.652, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 1945, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.559, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 1945, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.449, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 1945, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 1945, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1945, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.069, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.069, "year": 1945, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 1945, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 240}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e35301e462a844708dd51d3d4f9b9a19", "name": "Canada 1940 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 240)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1940, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1940 (March), CONSTITUENCY level (240 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anti_conscriptionist": "Anti-Conscriptionist", "votes_canadian_labour": "Canadian Labour", "votes_co_operative_commonwealth_federation": "Co-operative Commonwealth Federation", "votes_communist_party_of_canada": "Communist Party of Canada", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_farmer_labour": "Farmer Labour", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_conservative": "Independent Conservative", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_independent_nationalist": "Independent Nationalist", "votes_labour": "Labour", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_progressive": "Liberal Progressive", "votes_national_government": "National Government", "votes_national_labour": "National Labour", "votes_national_liberal_progressive": "National Liberal Progressive", "votes_national_unity": "National Unity", "votes_new_democracy": "New Democracy", "votes_social_credit_party_of_canada": "Social Credit Party of Canada", "votes_social_credit_national_unity": "Social Credit-National Unity", "votes_united_farmers_of_ontario_labour": "United Farmers of Ontario-Labour", "votes_united_progressive": "United Progressive", "votes_united_reform": "United Reform", "votes_united_reform_movement": "United Reform Movement", "votes_unity": "Unity", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 240, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 240, "registered_not_positive": 240}, "n_stations_flagged": 240, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:02.163445", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.64, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.885, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.662, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.555, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.64, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 1940, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1940, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1940, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.574, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.643, "year": 1940, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 1940, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 1940, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.497, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 1940, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.662, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.662, "year": 1940, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 1940, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.431, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 1940, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 1940, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1940, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.069, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.069, "year": 1940, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 1940, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 240}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d02826ae6208427699f217eeaf8f24b9", "name": "Canada 1935 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 240)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1935, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1935 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (240 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anti_communist": "Anti-Communist", "votes_co_operative_commonwealth_federation": "Co-operative Commonwealth Federation", "votes_communist_party_of_canada": "Communist Party of Canada", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_conservative": "Independent Conservative", "votes_independent_labor": "Independent Labor", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_independent_reconstruction_party": "Independent Reconstruction Party", "votes_labour": "Labour", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_labour": "Liberal Labour", "votes_liberal_progressive": "Liberal Progressive", "votes_reconstruction_party": "Reconstruction Party", "votes_social_credit_party_of_canada": "Social Credit Party of Canada", "votes_socialist": "Socialist", "votes_technocrat": "Technocrat", "votes_united_farmers_of_ontario_labour": "United Farmers of Ontario-Labour", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_verdun": "Verdun", "votes_veterans_party": "Veterans Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 240, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 240, "registered_not_positive": 240}, "n_stations_flagged": 240, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:58:00.720882", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.648, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.884, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.662, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.555, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 1935, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.884, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1935, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1935, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.553, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 1935, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 1935, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 1935, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.507, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.377, "year": 1935, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.662, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.662, "year": 1935, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 1935, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.417, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.417, "year": 1935, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 1935, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1935, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.066, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.066, "year": 1935, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 1935, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 240}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "493636d0aec64142ad6abdba0e762d1c", "name": "Canada 1930 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 238)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1930, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1930 (July), CONSTITUENCY level (238 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_co_operative_commonwealth_federation": "Co-operative Commonwealth Federation", "votes_communist_party_of_canada": "Communist Party of Canada", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_farmer": "Farmer", "votes_farmer_labour": "Farmer Labour", "votes_franc_lib": "Franc Lib", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_conservative": "Independent Conservative", "votes_independent_labor": "Independent Labor", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_independent_progressive": "Independent Progressive", "votes_labour": "Labour", "votes_labour_farmer": "Labour Farmer", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_labour": "Liberal Labour", "votes_liberal_progressive": "Liberal Progressive", "votes_liberal_protectionist": "Liberal Protectionist", "votes_progressive": "Progressive", "votes_prohibition": "Prohibition", "votes_united_farmers_of_alberta": "United Farmers of Alberta", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 238, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 238, "cast_gt_registered": 236}, "n_stations_flagged": 238, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:59.444917", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.642, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.886, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.663, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.555, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 1930, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1930, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.859, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1930, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.64, "year": 1930, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 1930, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 1930, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.151, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 1930, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.663, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.663, "year": 1930, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 1930, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.41, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 1930, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 1930, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1930, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.066, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.066, "year": 1930, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 1930, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 238}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c16f36b4fe3f472099ae676be0617faa", "name": "Canada 1926 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 238)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1926, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1926 (September), CONSTITUENCY level (238 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_conservative": "Independent Conservative", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_labour": "Labour", "votes_labour_farmer": "Labour Farmer", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_labour_party": "Liberal Labour Party", "votes_liberal_labour_progressive": "Liberal Labour Progressive", "votes_liberal_progressive": "Liberal Progressive", "votes_progressive": "Progressive", "votes_protectionist": "Protectionist", "votes_socialist": "Socialist", "votes_united_farmers_of_alberta": "United Farmers of Alberta", "votes_united_farmers_of_ontario": "United Farmers of Ontario", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 238, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 238, "cast_gt_registered": 237}, "n_stations_flagged": 238, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:57.889211", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.645, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.878, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.667, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.559, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1926, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1926, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1926, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.335, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 1926, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 1926, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 1926, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.154, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 1926, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.667, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 1926, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.559, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 1926, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 1926, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 1926, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1926, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.066, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.066, "year": 1926, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 1926, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 238}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8b24832730ff4fa99da1885667c93d10", "name": "Canada 1925 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 238)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1925, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1925 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (238 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_farmer": "Farmer", "votes_farmer_labour": "Farmer Labour", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_conservative": "Independent Conservative", "votes_independent_labor": "Independent Labor", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_independent_liberal_progressive": "Independent Liberal Progressive", "votes_independent_progressive": "Independent Progressive", "votes_labour": "Labour", "votes_labour_farmer": "Labour Farmer", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_progressive": "Liberal Progressive", "votes_liberal_protectionist": "Liberal Protectionist", "votes_progressive": "Progressive", "votes_socialist": "Socialist", "votes_united_farmers_of_alberta": "United Farmers of Alberta", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 238, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 238, "cast_gt_registered": 238}, "n_stations_flagged": 238, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:56.156113", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.645, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.338, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.667, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.562, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1925, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.338, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 1925, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1925, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.335, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 1925, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 1925, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 1925, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.154, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 1925, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.667, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 1925, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.562, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 1925, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 1925, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 1925, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1925, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.066, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.066, "year": 1925, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 1925, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 238}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "93b580c07ab24507b0d030a75243fe11", "name": "Canada 1921 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 227)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1921, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1921 (December), CONSTITUENCY level (227 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_conservative": "Independent Conservative", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_independent_progressive": "Independent Progressive", "votes_labour": "Labour", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_progressive": "Progressive", "votes_socialist": "Socialist", "votes_united_farmers_of_alberta": "United Farmers of Alberta", "votes_united_farmers_of_ontario": "United Farmers of Ontario", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 227, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 227, "registered_not_positive": 227}, "n_stations_flagged": 227, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:50.620186", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.64, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.881, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.587, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.494, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.64, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 1921, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1921, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1921, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.332, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.583, "year": 1921, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 1921, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 1921, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.159, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.29, "year": 1921, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.587, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 1921, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.494, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.494, "year": 1921, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.358, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.358, "year": 1921, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 1921, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1921, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.063, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.063, "year": 1921, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 1921, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 227}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "546ce3b043664258a6dd4112f3ab0329", "name": "Canada 1917 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 227)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1917, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1917 (December), CONSTITUENCY level (227 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_government": "Government", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_labour": "Labour", "votes_non_partisan_league": "Non-Partisan League", "votes_opposition": "Opposition", "votes_opposition_labour": "Opposition-Labour", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 227, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 227, "cast_gt_registered": 196}, "n_stations_flagged": 227, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:49.153258", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.046, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.465, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.404, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.046, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 1917, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1917, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.508, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 1917, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.474, "year": 1917, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 1917, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 1917, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.245, "year": 1917, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.465, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.465, "year": 1917, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 1917, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.262, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.262, "year": 1917, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 1917, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1917, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.063, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.063, "year": 1917, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 1917, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 227}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f8cdf1b6e1ed4f97acd1e35227e9710b", "name": "Canada 1911 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 215)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1911, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1911 (September), CONSTITUENCY level (215 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_conservative": "Independent Conservative", "votes_labour": "Labour", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_conservative": "Liberal-Conservative", "votes_nationalist": "Nationalist", "votes_nationalist_conservative": "Nationalist Conservative", "votes_socialist": "Socialist", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 215, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 215, "cast_gt_registered": 211}, "n_stations_flagged": 215, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:47.910663", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.608, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.899, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.482, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.416, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.608, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1911, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1911, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1911, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.006, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.501, "year": 1911, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 1911, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 1911, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.244, "year": 1911, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.482, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.482, "year": 1911, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.416, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.416, "year": 1911, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.255, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.255, "year": 1911, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 1911, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1911, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.068, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.068, "year": 1911, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 1911, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 215}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fd097f14fef849af84145ef550e7c0af", "name": "Canada 1908 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 215)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1908, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1908 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (215 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_conservative": "Independent Conservative", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_labour": "Labour", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_conservative": "Liberal-Conservative", "votes_socialist": "Socialist", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 215, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 212, "registered_not_positive": 215}, "n_stations_flagged": 215, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:46.626367", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.575, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.479, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.415, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.575, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 1908, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1908, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1908, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.998, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.499, "year": 1908, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 1908, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 1908, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.99, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.247, "year": 1908, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 1908, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.415, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 1908, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.254, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.254, "year": 1908, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 1908, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1908, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.069, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.069, "year": 1908, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 1908, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 215}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "569ad51719c741f699c88b9bc7d8c636", "name": "Canada 1904 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 209)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1904, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1904 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (209 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_conservative": "Independent Conservative", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_labour": "Labour", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_conservative": "Liberal-Conservative", "votes_nationalist": "Nationalist", "votes_socialist": "Socialist", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 209, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 205, "registered_not_positive": 209}, "n_stations_flagged": 209, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:45.400063", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.612, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.898, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.481, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.414, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.612, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1904, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.898, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1904, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1904, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.001, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.5, "year": 1904, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 1904, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 1904, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.98, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.245, "year": 1904, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.481, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 1904, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.414, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.414, "year": 1904, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.255, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.255, "year": 1904, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 1904, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1904, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.069, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.069, "year": 1904, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 1904, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 209}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8ce5b743b2c44fb0939d3cf0275fd877", "name": "Canada 1900 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 201)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1900, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1900 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (201 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_conservative": "Independent Conservative", "votes_independent_labor": "Independent Labor", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_labour": "Labour", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_conservative": "Liberal-Conservative", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 201, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 201, "cast_gt_registered": 197}, "n_stations_flagged": 201, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:44.061536", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.61, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.898, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.471, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.407, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.61, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.898, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.997, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.499, "year": 1900, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 1900, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 1900, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.983, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.471, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.471, "year": 1900, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.407, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.407, "year": 1900, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.249, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 1900, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.069, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.069, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 201}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2ae871edd8b346c98559ffdb4b5b23ca", "name": "Canada 1896 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 201)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1896, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1896 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (201 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_conservative": "Independent Conservative", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_conservative": "Liberal-Conservative", "votes_mccarthyite": "McCarthyite", "votes_nationalist": "Nationalist", "votes_patrons_of_industry": "Patrons of Industry", "votes_protestant_protective_association": "Protestant Protective Association", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 201, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 197, "registered_not_positive": 201}, "n_stations_flagged": 201, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:42.691762", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.549, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.824, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.478, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.412, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.549, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 1896, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1896, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1896, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.072, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.518, "year": 1896, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 1896, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 1896, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.478, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.478, "year": 1896, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.412, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 1896, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 1896, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1896, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.069, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.069, "year": 1896, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 1896, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 201}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5d4b293404884936ae6245b7e8edd832", "name": "Canada 1891 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 201)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1891, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1891 (March), CONSTITUENCY level (201 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_equal_rights": "Equal Rights", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_conservative": "Independent Conservative", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_conservative": "Liberal-Conservative", "votes_nationalist": "Nationalist", "votes_nationalist_conservative": "Nationalist Conservative", "votes_progressive": "Progressive", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 201, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 193, "registered_not_positive": 201}, "n_stations_flagged": 201, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:41.487340", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.553, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.823, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.457, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.397, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.553, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 1891, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.823, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1891, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.789, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1891, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.089, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.522, "year": 1891, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 1891, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 1891, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.457, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 1891, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.397, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.397, "year": 1891, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 1891, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1891, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.069, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.069, "year": 1891, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 1891, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 201}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b90738c74385492ba9c2d296290bd3bf", "name": "Canada 1887 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 201)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1887, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1887 (February), CONSTITUENCY level (201 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_conservative": "Independent Conservative", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_conservative": "Liberal-Conservative", "votes_nationalist": "Nationalist", "votes_nationalist_conservative": "Nationalist Conservative", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 201, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 201, "cast_gt_registered": 193}, "n_stations_flagged": 201, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:40.147364", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.553, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.839, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.449, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.392, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.553, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 1887, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.839, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1887, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1887, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.045, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.511, "year": 1887, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 1887, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 1887, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.449, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 1887, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.392, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 1887, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 1887, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1887, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.069, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.069, "year": 1887, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 1887, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 201}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fdb56e9c24ae4dd0806ebe7f6234902e", "name": "Canada 1882 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 197)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1882, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1882 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (197 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_conservative": "Independent Conservative", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_conservative": "Liberal-Conservative", "votes_nationalist_conservative": "Nationalist Conservative", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 197, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 173, "registered_not_positive": 197}, "n_stations_flagged": 197, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:38.791807", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.542, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.83, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.436, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.385, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.542, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 1882, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1882, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1882, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.083, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 1882, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 1882, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 1882, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.436, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.436, "year": 1882, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.385, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.385, "year": 1882, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 1882, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1882, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.069, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.069, "year": 1882, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 1882, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 197}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "60e5957ed54c4d80a39831d85d84adef", "name": "Canada 1878 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 192)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1878, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1878 (September), CONSTITUENCY level (192 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_conservative": "Independent Conservative", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_conservative": "Liberal-Conservative", "votes_nationalist_conservative": "Nationalist Conservative", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 192, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 181, "registered_not_positive": 192}, "n_stations_flagged": 192, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:37.574018", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.547, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.814, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.431, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.381, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.547, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 1878, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.814, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1878, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1878, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.518, "year": 1878, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 1878, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 1878, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.431, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 1878, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 1878, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 1878, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1878, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.069, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.069, "year": 1878, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 1878, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 192}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "909e3735774f4dba8a30dd1b64d7022c", "name": "Canada 1874 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 192)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1874, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1874 (January), CONSTITUENCY level (192 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_conservative_labour": "Conservative-Labour", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_conservative": "Independent Conservative", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_conservative": "Liberal-Conservative", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 192, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 192, "cast_gt_registered": 140}, "n_stations_flagged": 192, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:36.351791", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.547, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.818, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.402, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.363, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.547, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.052, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.513, "year": 1874, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 1874, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 1874, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.402, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.402, "year": 1874, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.363, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 1874, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 1874, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.069, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.069, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 1874, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 192}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "042ee957d4da4a98b8b1f8329cc3383f", "name": "Canada 1872 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 189)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1872, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1872 (July), CONSTITUENCY level (189 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_conservative_labour": "Conservative-Labour", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_conservative": "Independent Conservative", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_conservative": "Liberal-Conservative", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 189, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 140, "registered_not_positive": 189}, "n_stations_flagged": 189, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:35.156593", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.551, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.823, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.402, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.336, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.823, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.798, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.074, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.518, "year": 1872, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 1872, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 1872, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.402, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.402, "year": 1872, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.336, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.336, "year": 1872, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 1872, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.069, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.069, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 1872, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 189}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "79cf3e7e7f6c474c87527df43ff97df3", "name": "Canada 1867 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 176)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1867, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Canada lower-house election 1867 (August), CONSTITUENCY level (176 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anti_confederate": "Anti-Confederate", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_liberal_conservative": "Liberal-Conservative", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 176, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 176, "cast_gt_registered": 132}, "n_stations_flagged": 176, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:33.856096", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.55, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.814, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.351, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.308, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.55, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 1867, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.814, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1867, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1867, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.084, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 1867, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 1867, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 1867, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.351, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 1867, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.308, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.308, "year": 1867, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 1867, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1867, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.069, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.069, "year": 1867, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 1867, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 176}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f8971f034e044eaeadde43ac61cc4f9d", "name": "Bangladesh 2008 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 300)", "metadata": {"country": "Bangladesh", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Bangladesh lower-house election 2008 (December), CONSTITUENCY level (300 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bangladesh_awami_league": "Bangladesh Awami League", "votes_bangladesh_communist_party": "Bangladesh Communist Party", "votes_bangladesh_islamic_front": "Bangladesh Islamic Front", "votes_bangladesh_jamaytee_islami": "Bangladesh Jamaytee Islami", "votes_bangladesh_jatiya_party_bjp": "Bangladesh Jatiya Party-BJP", "votes_bangladesh_kalyan_party": "Bangladesh Kalyan Party", "votes_bangladesh_khalafat_andolon": "Bangladesh Khalafat Andolon", "votes_bangladesh_khalafat_majlish": "Bangladesh Khalafat Majlish", "votes_bangladesh_national_awami_party": "Bangladesh National Awami Party", "votes_bangladesh_national_awami_party_bang": "Bangladesh National Awami Party - Bangladesh NAP", "votes_bangladesh_national_party": "Bangladesh National Party", "votes_bangladesh_nationalist_party": "Bangladesh Nationalist Party", "votes_bangladesh_samajtantric_dal": "Bangladesh Samajtantric Dal", "votes_bangladesh_tarikat_federation": "Bangladesh Tarikat Federation", "votes_bangladesh_workers_party": "Bangladesh Workers Party", "votes_bikalpodhara_bangladesh": "Bikalpodhara Bangladesh", "votes_gano_forum": "Gano Forum", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_islami_andolan_bangladesh": "Islami Andolan Bangladesh", "votes_islami_oikya_jote": "Islami Oikya Jote", "votes_jaker_party": "Jaker Party", "votes_jamiyate_ulamaye_islam_bangladesh": "Jamiyate Ulamaye Islam Bangladesh", "votes_jatiya_party": "Jatiya Party", "votes_jatiya_samajtantric_dal_jsd": "Jatiya Samajtantric Dal - JSD", "votes_jatiya_samajtantric_dal_jasad": "Jatiya Samajtantric Dal - Jasad", "votes_jatiyo_ganotantric_party": "Jatiyo Ganotantric Party", "votes_krishak_sramik_janata_league": "Krishak Sramik Janata League", "votes_liberal_democratic_party_ldp": "Liberal Democratic Party - LDP", "votes_national_people_s_party": "National People's Party", "votes_progatishil_ganotantrik_dal": "Progatishil Ganotantrik Dal", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 300, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 299, "registered_not_positive": 300}, "n_stations_flagged": 300, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:32.247896", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.01, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.708, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.21, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.105, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.01, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.005, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.283, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.451, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.367, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.342, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.989, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.497, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.21, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.21, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.105, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.105, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.107, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.107, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.547, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.547, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.795, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.594, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.594, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 300}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7dba948b250d433da35f3ad115cafd74", "name": "Bangladesh 2001 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 300)", "metadata": {"country": "Bangladesh", "year": 2001, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Bangladesh lower-house election 2001 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (300 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bangladesh_awami_league": "Bangladesh Awami League", "votes_bangladesh_communist_party": "Bangladesh Communist Party", "votes_bangladesh_hindu_league": "Bangladesh Hindu League", "votes_bangladesh_islamic_front": "Bangladesh Islamic Front", "votes_bangladesh_jamaytee_islami": "Bangladesh Jamaytee Islami", "votes_bangladesh_janata_party": "Bangladesh Janata Party", "votes_bangladesh_jatiya_party_bjp": "Bangladesh Jatiya Party-BJP", "votes_bangladesh_khalafat_andolon": "Bangladesh Khalafat Andolon", "votes_bangladesh_krisak_sramik": "Bangladesh Krisak Sramik", "votes_bangladesh_national_awami_party_bang": "Bangladesh National Awami Party - Bangladesh NAP", "votes_bangladesh_nationalist_party": "Bangladesh Nationalist Party", "votes_bangladesh_peoples_congress": "Bangladesh Peoples Congress", "votes_bangladesh_progressive_party": "Bangladesh Progressive Party", "votes_bangladesh_samajtantric_dal": "Bangladesh Samajtantric Dal", "votes_bangladesh_samajtantrik_dal_mahbub": "Bangladesh Samajtantrik Dal (Mahbub)", "votes_bangladesh_samyabadi_dal": "Bangladesh Samyabadi Dal", "votes_bangladesh_workers_party": "Bangladesh Workers Party", "votes_communist_party": "Communist Party", "votes_gano_forum": "Gano Forum", "votes_gonotantri_party": "Gonotantri Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_islami_oikya_jote": "Islami Oikya Jote", "votes_islami_shasantantra_andolon": "Islami Shasantantra Andolon", "votes_jaker_party": "Jaker Party", "votes_jamiyate_ulamaye_islam_bangladesh": "Jamiyate Ulamaye Islam Bangladesh", "votes_jatiya_party": "Jatiya Party", "votes_jatiya_party_jp": "Jatiya Party - JP", "votes_jatiya_samajtantric_dal_jasad": "Jatiya Samajtantric Dal - Jasad", "votes_krishak_sramik_janata_league": "Krishak Sramik Janata League", "votes_liberal_democrats_party": "Liberal Democrats Party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 300, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:30.524244", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.645, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.505, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.271, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.349, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.48, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.62, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.423, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.244, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.311, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.182, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.505, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.271, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.271, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.212, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.212, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.653, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.747, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.747, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 300}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f4971f90758b4db089b2d00ef6d95061", "name": "Bangladesh 1991 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 300)", "metadata": {"country": "Bangladesh", "year": 1991, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Bangladesh lower-house election 1991, CONSTITUENCY level (300 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_awami_league": "Awami League", "votes_bangladesh_krishnak_sramik_awami_lea": "Bangladesh Krishnak Sramik Awami League", "votes_bangladesh_nationalist_party": "Bangladesh Nationalist Party", "votes_communist_party_of_bangladesh": "Communist Party of Bangladesh", "votes_freedom_party": "Freedom Party", "votes_gonotantri_party": "Gonotantri Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_islami_oikkyo_jote": "Islami Oikkyo Jote", "votes_islami_oikyo_front": "Islami Oikyo Front", "votes_islamic_front": "Islamic Front", "votes_jjp_goj_coalition": "JJP/GOJ Coalition", "votes_jamaat_e_islami": "Jamaat-E-Islami", "votes_janata_dal": "Janata Dal", "votes_janata_mukti_party": "Janata Mukti Party", "votes_jatiya_ganantrik_party": "Jatiya Ganantrik Party", "votes_jatiya_oikyo_front": "Jatiya Oikyo Front", "votes_jatiya_party": "Jatiya Party", "votes_jatiya_samajtantrik_dal_inu": "Jatiya Samajtantrik Dal (INU)", "votes_jatiya_samajtantrik_dal_rab": "Jatiya Samajtantrik Dal (RAB)", "votes_khelafat_andolan": "Khelafat Andolan", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_muslim_league_k": "Muslim League (K)", "votes_national_awami_party_bhasani": "National Awami Party (Bhasani)", "votes_national_awami_party_muzaffar": "National Awami Party (Muzaffar)", "votes_national_democratic_party": "National Democratic Party", "votes_socialist_party_khaleque": "Socialist Party (Khaleque)", "votes_socialist_party_mah": "Socialist Party (Mah)", "votes_united_communist_league": "United Communist League", "votes_workers_party": "Workers' Party", "votes_zaker_party": "Zaker Party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 300, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 300, "cast_gt_registered": 300}, "n_stations_flagged": 300, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:28.718735", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.922, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.483, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.253, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.731, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.344, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.678, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.244, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.311, "year": 1991, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.716, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.179, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.483, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.483, "year": 1991, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.253, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.253, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.203, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.203, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.654, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.471, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.471, "year": 1991, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.788, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.735, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 300}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d29a9a5c645e495582aab75726ecd386", "name": "Bangladesh 1973 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 300)", "metadata": {"country": "Bangladesh", "year": 1973, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Bangladesh lower-house election 1973 (March), CONSTITUENCY level (300 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_990": "-990", "votes_bangladesh_awami_league": "Bangladesh Awami League", "votes_bangladesh_communist_party": "Bangladesh Communist Party", "votes_bangladesh_jatiya_congress": "Bangladesh Jatiya Congress", "votes_bangladesh_jatiya_league": "Bangladesh Jatiya League", "votes_bangladesh_national_awami_party_bang": "Bangladesh National Awami Party - Bangladesh NAP", "votes_bangladesh_samajtantric_dal": "Bangladesh Samajtantric Dal", "votes_bangladesh_sramik_fedaration": "Bangladesh Sramik Fedaration", "votes_communist_party_of_bangladesh_lenini": "Communist Party of Bangladesh (Leninist)", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jatiya_ganatantri_dal": "Jatiya Ganatantri Dal", "votes_jatiya_samajtantric_dal_jasad": "Jatiya Samajtantric Dal - Jasad", "votes_national_awami_party_muzaffar_group": "National Awami Party (Muzaffar Group)", "votes_sramik_krishak_samajbadi_dal": "Sramik Krishak Samajbadi Dal"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 300, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 26, "cast_gt_registered": 26}, "n_stations_flagged": 26, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:27.067067", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.536, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.534, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.362, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.189, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.536, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.634, "year": 1973, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 1973, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 1973, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.371, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.343, "year": 1973, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.294, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.324, "year": 1973, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 1973, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.23, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.362, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.362, "year": 1973, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.189, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.189, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.173, "year": 1973, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.571, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 1973, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.52, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.52, "year": 1973, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.649, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 1973, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.619, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 1973, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 300}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0292d68b1f2c4704952d4877c64e39c0", "name": "Azerbaijan 2010 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 125)", "metadata": {"country": "Azerbaijan", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Azerbaijan lower-house election 2010, CONSTITUENCY level (125 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_aydinlar_party": "Aydinlar Party", "votes_azadlig_party": "Azadlig Party", "votes_azerbaijan_communist_party": "Azerbaijan Communist Party", "votes_azerbaijan_democrat_party": "Azerbaijan Democrat Party", "votes_azerbaijan_free_republicans_party": "Azerbaijan Free Republicans Party", "votes_azerbaijan_hope_party": "Azerbaijan Hope Party", "votes_azerbaijan_liberal_party": "Azerbaijan Liberal Party", "votes_azerbaijan_national_democrat_party": "Azerbaijan National Democrat Party", "votes_azerbaijan_national_independence_par": "Azerbaijan National Independence Party", "votes_azerbaijan_political_party_of_democr": "Azerbaijan Political Party of Democratic Reforms", "votes_azerbaijan_popular_front_party": "Azerbaijan Popular Front Party", "votes_azerbaijan_popular_party": "Azerbaijan Popular Party", "votes_azerbaijan_progress_party": "Azerbaijan Progress Party", "votes_azerbaijan_social_democrat_party": "Azerbaijan Social Democrat Party", "votes_azerbaijan_social_welfare_party": "Azerbaijan Social Welfare Party", "votes_citizen_and_development_party": "Citizen and Development Party", "votes_civil_solidarity_party": "Civil Solidarity Party", "votes_civil_union_party": "Civil Union Party", "votes_classic_popular_front_party": "Classic Popular Front Party", "votes_democratic_azerbaijan_world_party": "Democratic Azerbaijan World Party", "votes_great_creation_party": "Great Creation Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_w_party_membership": "Independent w/ Party Membership", "votes_justice_party": "Justice Party", "votes_modern_musavat_party": "Modern Musavat Party", "votes_motherland_party": "Motherland Party", "votes_musavat_party": "Musavat Party", "votes_new_azerbaijan_party": "New Azerbaijan Party", "votes_unity_party": "Unity Party", "votes_whole_azerbaijan_popular_front_party": "Whole Azerbaijan Popular Front Party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 125, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:25.933824", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.518, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.417, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.213, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.069, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.518, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.13, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.417, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.354, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.23, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.314, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.079, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.217, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.054, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.433, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.537, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.213, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.213, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.069, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.069, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.144, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.144, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.419, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.419, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.047, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.047, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.206, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.206, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 125}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2ca3571ae2374d31a6fe33d32d7f71a0", "name": "Australia 1984 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 148)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 1984, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Australia lower-house election 1984 (December), CONSTITUENCY level (148 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_australian_democrats": "Australian Democrats", "votes_australian_labor_party": "Australian Labor Party", "votes_communist_party_of_australia": "Communist Party of Australia", "votes_country_liberal_party": "Country Liberal Party", "votes_deadly_serious_party": "Deadly Serious Party", "votes_democratic_labor_party": "Democratic Labor Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_liberal_party_of_australia": "Liberal Party of Australia", "votes_national_party_of_australia": "National Party of Australia", "votes_nuclear_disarmament_party": "Nuclear Disarmament Party", "votes_pensioner_party_of_australia": "Pensioner Party of Australia", "votes_socialist_workers_party": "Socialist Workers Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 148, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:24.579694", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.759, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.887, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.884, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.842, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.759, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.859, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.595, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.801, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 1984, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 1984, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 1984, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.99, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.035, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 148}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8b7d3eeb23414c569c519533fff8762f", "name": "Australia 1949 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 123)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 1949, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Australia lower-house election 1949 (December), CONSTITUENCY level (123 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_australian_labor_party": "Australian Labor Party", "votes_communist_party_of_australia": "Communist Party of Australia", "votes_country_party": "Country Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_country": "Independent Country", "votes_independent_labor": "Independent Labor", "votes_independent_liberal": "Independent Liberal", "votes_lang_labor": "Lang Labor", "votes_liberal_party_of_australia": "Liberal Party of Australia"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 123, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:22.930903", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.735, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.883, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.818, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.743, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.653, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.797, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 1949, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.818, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 1949, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.743, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 1949, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.591, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 1949, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.042, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.042, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.905, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 1949, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 123}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1fcfa33f8d764dd3a88fef9b5a18e54a", "name": "Albania 2005 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 101)", "metadata": {"country": "Albania", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Albania lower-house election 2005, CONSTITUENCY level (101 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_ad": "ad", "votes_ams": "ams", "votes_bdsh": "bdsh", "votes_bld": "bld", "votes_independent": "independent", "votes_lbsh": "lbsh", "votes_ldlnj": "ldlnj", "votes_lsi": "lsi", "votes_lzhk": "lzhk", "votes_paa": "paa", "votes_passh": "passh", "votes_pbdk": "pbdk", "votes_pbdnj": "pbdnj", "votes_pbk": "pbk", "votes_pd": "pd", "votes_pddrdsh": "pddrdsh", "votes_pdi": "pdi", "votes_pdk": "pdk", "votes_pdr": "pdr", "votes_pdssh": "pdssh", "votes_pksh": "pksh", "votes_plmdsh": "plmdsh", "votes_ppsh": "ppsh", "votes_pr": "pr", "votes_psd": "psd", "votes_pshs_puk": "pshs + puk", "votes_pshs_puk_2": "pshs+puk", "votes_pshsk": "pshsk", "votes_pssh": "pssh", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 101, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 33, "registered_not_positive": 1, "cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 34, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:21.865237", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.637, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.96, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.518, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.425, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.637, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.96, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.585, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.396, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.115, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.591, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.47, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.518, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.518, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.425, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.425, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.367, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.367, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.648, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.809, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 101}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "676fe3d386ef4d85aec14f886a58c22d", "name": "Albania 2001 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 100)", "metadata": {"country": "Albania", "year": 2001, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Albania lower-house election 2001, CONSTITUENCY level (100 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_ad": "ad", "votes_p_kons": "p.kons", "votes_palsh": "palsh", "votes_pash": "pash", "votes_pbdks": "pbdks", "votes_pbdnj": "pbdnj", "votes_pbdsh": "pbdsh", "votes_pbksh": "pbksh", "votes_pbrsh": "pbrsh", "votes_pbsh": "pbsh", "votes_pd": "pd", "votes_pd_bf": "pd+bf", "votes_pdk": "pdk", "votes_pesh": "pesh", "votes_pkbsh": "pkbsh", "votes_pksh": "pksh", "votes_pl_monarkiste": "pl. monarkiste", "votes_plfsh": "plfsh", "votes_plpsh": "plpsh", "votes_pmp": "pmp", "votes_ppk": "ppk", "votes_prdsh": "prdsh", "votes_prsh": "prsh", "votes_psd": "psd", "votes_psha": "psha", "votes_psksh": "psksh", "votes_psksh_2": "psksh+", "votes_pssh": "pssh", "votes_puk": "puk", "votes_pv": "pv", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 100, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 7}, "n_stations_flagged": 7, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:20.608577", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.161, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.4, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.438, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.366, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.161, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.4, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.018, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.268, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.827, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.262, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.566, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.758, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.366, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.366, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.323, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.323, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.621, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 100}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "49d9cbdc804f4671a35634bf7b738d14", "name": "Yugoslavia 1927 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, county, 349)", "metadata": {"country": "Yugoslavia", "year": 1927, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Yugoslavia parliamentary election 1927-09-11, sub-national (county) level, 349 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bss": "BSS", "votes_cfp": "CFP", "votes_ds": "DS", "votes_hb": "HB", "votes_hpus": "HPuS", "votes_hss": "HSS", "votes_hz": "HZ", "votes_jmo": "JMO", "votes_nas": "NAS", "votes_nrp": "NRP", "votes_nrs": "NRS", "votes_ns": "NS", "votes_rs": "RS", "votes_rus": "RuS", "votes_sds": "SDS", "votes_slns": "SLNS", "votes_sp": "SP", "votes_spj": "SPJ", "votes_szsss": "SZSSS", "votes_others": "others"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 349, "granularity": "county", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:18.740986", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 349}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a0c26e837a52465a8957c64751f78cce", "name": "Yugoslavia 1925 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, county, 346)", "metadata": {"country": "Yugoslavia", "year": 1925, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Yugoslavia parliamentary election 1925-02-08, sub-national (county) level, 346 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bss": "BSS", "votes_cfp": "CFP", "votes_ds": "DS", "votes_dzemijet": "Dzemijet", "votes_hpus": "HPuS", "votes_hsp": "HSP", "votes_hss": "HSS", "votes_hz": "HZ", "votes_jmo": "JMO", "votes_nas": "NAS", "votes_nrp": "NRP", "votes_nrs": "NRS", "votes_ns": "NS", "votes_rs": "RS", "votes_sds": "SDS", "votes_slns": "SLNS", "votes_sp": "SP", "votes_spj": "SPJ", "votes_szsss": "SZSSS", "votes_others": "others"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 346, "granularity": "county", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:17.111264", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 346}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "85f0e0de346d420b994b889599a87395", "name": "Yugoslavia 1923 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, county, 341)", "metadata": {"country": "Yugoslavia", "year": 1923, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Yugoslavia parliamentary election 1923-03-18, sub-national (county) level, 341 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_at": "AT", "votes_bss": "BSS", "votes_cfp": "CFP", "votes_ds": "DS", "votes_dzemijet": "Dzemijet", "votes_hsp": "HSP", "votes_hss": "HSS", "votes_irs": "IRS", "votes_jmo": "JMO", "votes_jrs": "JRS", "votes_ls": "LS", "votes_nas": "NAS", "votes_nrp": "NRP", "votes_nrs": "NRS", "votes_ns": "NS", "votes_nss": "NSS", "votes_rpj": "RPJ", "votes_rs": "RS", "votes_rus": "RuS", "votes_slns_hpus": "SLNS - HPuS", "votes_sp": "SP", "votes_spj": "SPJ", "votes_szsss": "SZSSS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 341, "granularity": "county", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:11.460221", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 341}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e7f7d7da36204733a5198ebb809d15bc", "name": "Yugoslavia 1920 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, county, 341)", "metadata": {"country": "Yugoslavia", "year": 1920, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Yugoslavia parliamentary election 1920-11-28, sub-national (county) level, 341 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_at": "AT", "votes_ds": "DS", "votes_dzemijet": "Dzemijet", "votes_hps": "HPS", "votes_hpus_bss": "HPuS-BSS", "votes_hsp": "HSP", "votes_hss": "HSS", "votes_hz": "HZ", "votes_jmo": "JMO", "votes_kpj": "KPJ", "votes_ls": "LS", "votes_nrs": "NRS", "votes_nss": "NSS", "votes_rs": "RS", "votes_slns": "SLNS", "votes_spj": "SPJ", "votes_szsss": "SZSSS", "votes_others": "others"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 341, "granularity": "county", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:09.762226", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 341}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9bf235e0ea0947c0b2f71035b4425ea5", "name": "Netherlands 1937 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, gemeente, 1056)", "metadata": {"country": "Netherlands", "year": 1937, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Netherlands parliamentary election 1937-05-26, sub-national (gemeente) level, 1056 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alb": "ALB", "votes_arp": "ARP", "votes_acb": "AcB", "votes_cdu": "CDU", "votes_chu": "CHU", "votes_cna": "CNA", "votes_cpn": "CPN", "votes_hgs": "HGS", "votes_kdp": "KDP", "votes_lsp": "LSP", "votes_nsb": "NSB", "votes_nsnap": "NSNAP", "votes_pb_nbtm": "PB|NBTM", "votes_rksp": "RKSP", "votes_rsp": "RSP", "votes_sdap": "SDAP", "votes_sgp": "SGP", "votes_vdb": "VDB", "votes_vnh": "VNH", "votes_zf": "ZF"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1056, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:06.279598", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.77, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.888, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.732, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.647, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.77, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 1937, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1937, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.675, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 1937, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.131, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 1937, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 1937, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.733, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1937, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.764, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.441, "year": 1937, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1937, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.647, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 1937, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.514, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.514, "year": 1937, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 1937, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 1937, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.027, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.027, "year": 1937, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 1937, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1056}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7aaf1d51e4a74c7abe448c18468c4150", "name": "Netherlands 1933 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, gemeente, 1076)", "metadata": {"country": "Netherlands", "year": 1933, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Netherlands parliamentary election 1933-04-26, sub-national (gemeente) level, 1076 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anfb": "ANFB", "votes_arp": "ARP", "votes_cap": "CAP", "votes_cdu": "CDU", "votes_chu": "CHU", "votes_cpn": "CPN", "votes_dp": "DP", "votes_hgs": "HGS", "votes_kdb": "KDB", "votes_lf": "LF", "votes_lsp": "LSP", "votes_lijst_j": "Lijst J", "votes_lijst_w": "Lijst W", "votes_mk": "MK", "votes_nfu": "NFU", "votes_nsp": "NSP", "votes_nationaal_verbond_plicht_orde_rech": "Nationaal Verbond Plicht, Orde, Recht", "votes_osp": "OSP", "votes_oz": "OZ", "votes_pb_nbtm": "PB|NBTM", "votes_rkap": "RKAP", "votes_rksp": "RKSP", "votes_rkvp": "RKVP", "votes_rsp": "RSP", "votes_rev": "ReV", "votes_sdap": "SDAP", "votes_sgp": "SGP", "votes_vdb": "VDB", "votes_vnh": "VNH", "votes_vvn": "VvN", "votes_other": "OTHER"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1076, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:57:02.278259", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.781, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.888, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.736, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.651, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1933, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1933, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1933, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.134, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 1933, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 1933, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.733, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1933, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 1933, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 1933, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.651, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 1933, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.515, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.515, "year": 1933, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 1933, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 1933, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.027, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.027, "year": 1933, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 1933, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1076}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "90508bfcc07c4f54bed9c6c1d9535fde", "name": "Netherlands 1929 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, gemeente, 943)", "metadata": {"country": "Netherlands", "year": 1929, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Netherlands parliamentary election 1929-07-03, sub-national (gemeente) level, 943 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_arp": "ARP", "votes_asp": "ASP", "votes_awp": "AWP", "votes_cap": "CAP", "votes_cdu": "CDU", "votes_chu": "CHU", "votes_cpn": "CPN", "votes_dp": "DP", "votes_fv": "FV", "votes_hgs": "HGS", "votes_heh": "HeH", "votes_ip": "IP", "votes_km": "KM", "votes_lsp": "LSP", "votes_lijst_v": "Lijst V", "votes_lvn": "LvN", "votes_mpsl": "MPSL", "votes_nb": "NB", "votes_pb_nbtm": "PB|NBTM", "votes_rkbp": "RKBP", "votes_rksp": "RKSP", "votes_rkvp": "RKVP", "votes_rsp": "RSP", "votes_sdap": "SDAP", "votes_sdvp": "SDVP", "votes_sev": "SEV", "votes_sgp": "SGP", "votes_vdb": "VDB", "votes_vop": "VOP", "votes_vvn": "VvN", "votes_other": "OTHER"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 943, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:56:58.878618", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.775, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.886, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.736, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.651, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.775, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1929, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1929, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.686, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 1929, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.129, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 1929, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 1929, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.733, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1929, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.792, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.448, "year": 1929, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 1929, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.651, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 1929, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.51, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.51, "year": 1929, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 1929, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 1929, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.027, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.027, "year": 1929, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 1929, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 943}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "268c89ccf69c4a2697ebc7ba6be983f1", "name": "Netherlands 1925 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, gemeente, 957)", "metadata": {"country": "Netherlands", "year": 1925, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Netherlands parliamentary election 1925-07-01, sub-national (gemeente) level, 957 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_arp": "ARP", "votes_bb": "BB", "votes_cd": "CD", "votes_chu": "CHU", "votes_cpn": "CPN", "votes_dp": "DP", "votes_gp": "GP", "votes_groep_sh": "Groep SH", "votes_hgs": "HGS", "votes_lp": "LP", "votes_lsp": "LSP", "votes_mpsl": "MPSL", "votes_nnp": "NNP", "votes_pa": "PA", "votes_pb_nbtm": "PB|NBTM", "votes_ps": "PS", "votes_pvp": "PVP", "votes_rac": "RAC", "votes_rksp": "RKSP", "votes_rkvp": "RKVP", "votes_rp": "RP", "votes_sdap": "SDAP", "votes_sgp": "SGP", "votes_sp": "SP", "votes_spp": "SpP", "votes_v": "V", "votes_vdb": "VDB", "votes_vv": "VV", "votes_vva": "VvA", "votes_wp": "WP", "votes_other": "OTHER"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 957, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:56:55.297653", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.771, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.881, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.735, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.651, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.771, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 1925, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1925, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.678, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 1925, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.129, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 1925, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 1925, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.733, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1925, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.494, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.123, "year": 1925, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.735, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 1925, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.651, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 1925, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.51, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.51, "year": 1925, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 1925, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 1925, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.027, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.027, "year": 1925, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 1925, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 957}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dff98ba849c24549bc47718ae1c3d462", "name": "Netherlands 1922 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, gemeente, 854)", "metadata": {"country": "Netherlands", "year": 1922, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Netherlands parliamentary election 1922-07-05, sub-national (gemeente) level, 854 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anvo": "ANVO", "votes_arp": "ARP", "votes_bb": "BB", "votes_cdp": "CDP", "votes_chu": "CHU", "votes_cpn": "CPN", "votes_csp": "CSP", "votes_cvp": "CVP", "votes_dp": "DP", "votes_hgs": "HGS", "votes_kp": "KP", "votes_lp": "LP", "votes_lsp": "LSP", "votes_lijst_a": "Lijst A", "votes_lijst_vg": "Lijst vG", "votes_lijst_vdz": "Lijst vdZ", "votes_nbb": "NBB", "votes_nkp": "NKP", "votes_nmp": "NMP", "votes_op": "OP", "votes_pb": "PB", "votes_pb_nbtm": "PB|NBTM", "votes_pp": "PP", "votes_rksp": "RKSP", "votes_rp": "RP", "votes_sdap": "SDAP", "votes_sgp": "SGP", "votes_sp": "SP", "votes_vdb": "VDB", "votes_vwp": "VWP", "votes_other": "OTHER"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 854, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:56:52.411879", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.776, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.881, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.729, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.645, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.776, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.118, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 1922, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 1922, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.733, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.12, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.729, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 1922, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 1922, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.505, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 1922, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.027, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.027, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 1922, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 854}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c3ad909f02204850a48d039c547a39af", "name": "Latvia 1931 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, municipality, 579)", "metadata": {"country": "Latvia", "year": 1931, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Latvia parliamentary election 1931-10-03, sub-national (municipality) level, 579 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_ai": "AI", "votes_ajscak": "AJSCAK", "votes_annp": "ANNP", "votes_app": "APP", "votes_cc": "CC", "votes_dc": "DC", "votes_dvasaa": "DVASAA", "votes_j_s": "J-S", "votes_jza": "JZA", "votes_knp": "KNP", "votes_kpsd": "KPSD", "votes_ksz": "KSZ", "votes_kvdtv": "KVDTV", "votes_kza_sd": "KZA-SD", "votes_lds": "LDS", "votes_lkzs": "LKZS", "votes_lls": "LLS", "votes_lsdsp": "LSDSP", "votes_lzpa": "LZPA", "votes_mkr": "MKR", "votes_mizrachi": "Mizrachi", "votes_nu": "NU", "votes_pa": "PA", "votes_pv": "PV", "votes_pvko": "PVKO", "votes_rvsv": "RVSV", "votes_snz": "SNZ", "votes_ss": "SS", "votes_vp": "VP", "votes_zs": "ZS", "votes_other": "OTHER"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 579, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:56:50.196584", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.755, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.889, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.734, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.604, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.755, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1931, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1931, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.676, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 1931, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.764, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1931, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.973, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 1931, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 1931, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.698, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 1931, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 1931, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.604, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.604, "year": 1931, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 1931, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 1931, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 1931, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.198, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 1931, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 1931, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 579}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bc057206d4084f0b9e4a5555768a1f38", "name": "Latvia 1928 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, municipality, 576)", "metadata": {"country": "Latvia", "year": 1928, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Latvia parliamentary election 1928-10-06, sub-national (municipality) level, 576 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_ai": "AI", "votes_annp": "ANNP", "votes_avs": "AVS", "votes_bunds": "Bunds", "votes_cc": "CC", "votes_dc": "DC", "votes_j_s": "J-S", "votes_js": "JS", "votes_knp": "KNP", "votes_kpsd": "KPSD", "votes_ksz": "KSZ", "votes_kzk": "KZK", "votes_ld": "LD", "votes_lds": "LDS", "votes_lls": "LLS", "votes_ls": "LS", "votes_lsdsp": "LSDSP", "votes_mkr": "MKR", "votes_mizrachi": "Mizrachi", "votes_ns": "NS", "votes_nu": "NU", "votes_pklps": "PKLPS", "votes_pta": "PTA", "votes_pvko": "PVKO", "votes_sc_ak_t_r_a": "SC-AK-T-R-A", "votes_sdm_l": "SDM&L", "votes_ss": "SS", "votes_vp": "VP", "votes_vts": "VTS", "votes_zs": "ZS", "votes_other": "OTHER"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 576, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:56:47.850393", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.754, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.889, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.74, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.61, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1928, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1928, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.675, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 1928, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.764, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1928, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.973, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 1928, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 1928, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.679, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.42, "year": 1928, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 1928, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.61, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 1928, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.544, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 1928, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 1928, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 1928, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.198, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 1928, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 1928, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 576}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "aa8f8ae4a2154298b88a737c16c653cb", "name": "Latvia 1925 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, municipality, 578)", "metadata": {"country": "Latvia", "year": 1925, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Latvia parliamentary election 1925-10-03, sub-national (municipality) level, 578 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_ai": "AI", "votes_apss": "APSS", "votes_bunds": "Bunds", "votes_cc": "CC", "votes_dc": "DC", "votes_iap": "IAP", "votes_j_s": "J-S", "votes_js": "JS", "votes_kdls": "KDLS", "votes_kis": "KIS", "votes_knp": "KNP", "votes_kpsd": "KPSD", "votes_lbs": "LBS", "votes_ld": "LD", "votes_ldp": "LDP", "votes_lds": "LDS", "votes_lkzs": "LKZS", "votes_lmbz": "LMBZ", "votes_lsdsp": "LSDSP", "votes_lzp": "LZP", "votes_mkr": "MKR", "votes_mizrachi": "Mizrachi", "votes_nu": "NU", "votes_nza": "NZA", "votes_pklps": "PKLPS", "votes_pko": "PKO", "votes_sdm_l": "SDM&L", "votes_v": "V", "votes_vp": "VP", "votes_zs": "ZS", "votes_other": "OTHER"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 578, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:56:42.914942", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.756, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.88, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.744, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.612, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.756, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1925, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1925, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1925, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.756, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1925, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.973, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 1925, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 1925, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.69, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 1925, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.744, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 1925, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 1925, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.549, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 1925, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 1925, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 1925, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.198, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 1925, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 1925, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 578}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8d5af1ad07a64612aa3530f6b8bc1607", "name": "Latvia 1922 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, municipality, 575)", "metadata": {"country": "Latvia", "year": 1922, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Latvia parliamentary election 1922-10-07, sub-national (municipality) level, 575 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_ai": "AI", "votes_app": "APP", "votes_as": "AS", "votes_bka": "BKA", "votes_bp_jansons": "BP Jansons", "votes_bs": "BS", "votes_bunds": "Bunds", "votes_cc": "CC", "votes_dc": "DC", "votes_enb": "ENB", "votes_ig": "IG", "votes_js": "JS", "votes_kis": "KIS", "votes_knp": "KNP", "votes_lda": "LDA", "votes_ldp": "LDP", "votes_lks": "LKS", "votes_lkzs": "LKZS", "votes_lsdsp": "LSDSP", "votes_lta": "LTA", "votes_lvck": "LVCK", "votes_lzp": "LZP", "votes_lci": "Lci", "votes_nu": "NU", "votes_sdm_l": "SDM&L", "votes_vks": "VKS", "votes_vp": "VP", "votes_zra": "ZRA", "votes_zs": "ZS", "votes_zvs": "ZVS", "votes_other": "OTHER"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 575, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:56:40.541120", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.761, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.887, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.43, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.305, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.761, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.755, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.973, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 1922, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 1922, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.417, "year": 1922, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.43, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.43, "year": 1922, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.305, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.305, "year": 1922, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.339, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.339, "year": 1922, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 1922, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.126, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.126, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 1922, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 575}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "150cb41a16a147b797d60e51a035f7cc", "name": "Italy 1921 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, electoral constituency, 40)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 1921, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Italy parliamentary election 1921-05-15, sub-national (electoral constituency) level, 40 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bn": "BN", "votes_lst": "LST", "votes_pc": "PC", "votes_pcdi": "PCDI", "votes_pdcl": "PDCL", "votes_pdr": "PDR", "votes_pds": "PDS", "votes_pe": "PE", "votes_pldi": "PLDI", "votes_pli": "PLI", "votes_pnf": "PNF", "votes_ppi": "PPI", "votes_pri": "PRI", "votes_psi": "PSI", "votes_si": "SI"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:56:39.439418", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.568, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.593, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.362, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.276, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.568, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.642, "year": 1921, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.593, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1921, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.462, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 1921, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.177, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 1921, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.483, "year": 1921, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 1921, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.245, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 1921, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.362, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.362, "year": 1921, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 1921, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.159, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.159, "year": 1921, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.69, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.69, "year": 1921, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.591, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 1921, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.336, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.336, "year": 1921, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.68, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 1921, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 40}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c56fd952844542988a2486e6e5a6f625", "name": "Italy 1919 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, electoral constituency, 54)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 1919, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Italy parliamentary election 1919-11-16, sub-national (electoral constituency) level, 54 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_lcldr": "LCLDR", "votes_lcrrsc": "LCRRSC", "votes_pc": "PC", "votes_pd": "PD", "votes_pe": "PE", "votes_pnf": "PNF", "votes_ppi": "PPI", "votes_pr": "PR", "votes_pri": "PRI", "votes_psi": "PSI", "votes_psru": "PSRU", "votes_si": "SI", "votes_ul": "UL"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 54, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:56:38.565564", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.759, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.629, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.367, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.277, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.759, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.69, "year": 1919, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.629, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 1919, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 1919, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.134, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.533, "year": 1919, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.483, "year": 1919, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 1919, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.239, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 1919, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.367, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.367, "year": 1919, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.277, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.277, "year": 1919, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.159, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.159, "year": 1919, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.688, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 1919, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 1919, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.336, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.336, "year": 1919, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.683, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.683, "year": 1919, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 54}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "80ed22f5b8554123873bdf090de66603", "name": "Ireland 1938 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, constituency, 32)", "metadata": {"country": "Ireland", "year": 1938, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ireland parliamentary election 1938-06-17, sub-national (constituency) level, 32 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_ff": "FF", "votes_fg": "FG", "votes_fp": "FP", "votes_ind": "Ind", "votes_ind_lab": "Ind Lab", "votes_lab": "Lab", "votes_rep_lab": "Rep Lab"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 32, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:56:37.732988", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.631, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.842, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.756, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.646, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.631, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1938, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.842, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 1938, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1938, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.508, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 1938, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.104, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 1938, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.393, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1938, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.101, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.025, "year": 1938, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 1938, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 1938, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.553, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 1938, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 1938, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1938, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.074, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.074, "year": 1938, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 1938, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 32}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ab969a75ce794b08a9eaa3dcec1d46a0", "name": "Ireland 1937 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, constituency, 34)", "metadata": {"country": "Ireland", "year": 1937, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ireland parliamentary election 1937-07-01, sub-national (constituency) level, 34 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_ff": "FF", "votes_fg": "FG", "votes_fp": "FP", "votes_ind": "Ind", "votes_ind_lab": "Ind Lab", "votes_ind_r": "Ind R", "votes_lab": "Lab"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 34, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:56:36.759815", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.631, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.842, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.76, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.651, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.631, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1937, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.842, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 1937, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1937, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.508, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 1937, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.104, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 1937, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.393, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1937, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.101, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.025, "year": 1937, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 1937, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.651, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 1937, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.557, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 1937, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 1937, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1937, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.072, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.072, "year": 1937, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 1937, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 34}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8436d6161ed945b4a9d6029da4da40f2", "name": "Ireland 1933 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, constituency, 29)", "metadata": {"country": "Ireland", "year": 1933, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ireland parliamentary election 1933-01-24, sub-national (constituency) level, 29 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_cg": "CG", "votes_ff": "FF", "votes_ind": "Ind", "votes_ind_lab": "Ind Lab", "votes_lab": "Lab", "votes_ncp": "NCP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 29, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:56:35.874971", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.636, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.852, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.75, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.638, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 1933, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1933, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.667, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1933, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.508, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 1933, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.104, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 1933, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.393, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1933, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 1933, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 1933, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.638, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 1933, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.538, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 1933, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 1933, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1933, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.072, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.072, "year": 1933, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 1933, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 29}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b4f8f83cb86e4eaa94f33f2a5d1024a6", "name": "Ireland 1932 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, constituency, 29)", "metadata": {"country": "Ireland", "year": 1932, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ireland parliamentary election 1932-02-16, sub-national (constituency) level, 29 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_cg": "CG", "votes_com": "Com", "votes_ff": "FF", "votes_fp": "FP", "votes_ind": "Ind", "votes_ind_fp": "Ind FP", "votes_ind_lab": "Ind Lab", "votes_lab": "Lab"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 29, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:56:34.459257", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.636, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.852, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.748, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.636, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.667, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.508, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.104, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 1932, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.393, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1932, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.748, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.748, "year": 1932, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.636, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.636, "year": 1932, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 1932, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 1932, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 29}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "309ee04567a1408884902a9a949a489d", "name": "Ireland 1927 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, constituency, 29)", "metadata": {"country": "Ireland", "year": 1927, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ireland parliamentary election 1927-09-15, sub-national (constituency) level, 29 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_cg": "CG", "votes_ff": "FF", "votes_fp": "FP", "votes_ind": "Ind", "votes_ind_fp": "Ind FP", "votes_ind_lab": "Ind Lab", "votes_ind_sf": "Ind SF", "votes_lab": "Lab", "votes_nlp": "NLP", "votes_tta": "TTA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 29, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:56:33.154393", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.632, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.85, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.728, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.614, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.632, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1927, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1927, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.317, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 1927, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.511, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 1927, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.104, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 1927, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.393, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1927, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.027, "year": 1927, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1927, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 1927, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.505, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 1927, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 1927, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1927, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 1927, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 1927, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 29}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "37667abb5f5248b29b6d49e1f19d51a3", "name": "Ireland 1927 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, constituency, 30)", "metadata": {"country": "Ireland", "year": 1927, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ireland parliamentary election 1927-06-09, sub-national (constituency) level, 30 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_cg": "CG", "votes_c": "C\u00c9", "votes_ff": "FF", "votes_fp": "FP", "votes_ind": "Ind", "votes_ind_fp": "Ind FP", "votes_ind_lab": "Ind Lab", "votes_ind_r": "Ind R", "votes_lab": "Lab", "votes_nlp": "NLP", "votes_sfwp": "SFWP", "votes_tta": "TTA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 30, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:56:30.971599", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.632, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.85, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.728, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.614, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.632, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1927, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1927, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.317, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 1927, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.511, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 1927, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.104, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 1927, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.393, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1927, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.027, "year": 1927, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1927, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 1927, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.505, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 1927, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 1927, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1927, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 1927, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 1927, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 30}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "22346bea02754a8bad79152f8cb1800f", "name": "Ireland 1923 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, constituency, 29)", "metadata": {"country": "Ireland", "year": 1923, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ireland parliamentary election 1923-08-27, sub-national (constituency) level, 29 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bp": "BP", "votes_cg": "CG", "votes_cpa": "CPA", "votes_dtc": "DTC", "votes_ff": "FF", "votes_fp": "FP", "votes_ind": "Ind", "votes_ind_fp": "Ind FP", "votes_ind_lab": "Ind Lab", "votes_lab": "Lab", "votes_ndp": "NDP", "votes_rpa": "RPA", "votes_tta": "TTA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 29, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:56:29.791320", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.634, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.766, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.643, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.518, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1923, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.766, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1923, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 1923, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 1923, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.104, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 1923, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.393, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1923, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.101, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.025, "year": 1923, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.643, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.643, "year": 1923, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.518, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.518, "year": 1923, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.427, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 1923, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 1923, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1923, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.08, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.08, "year": 1923, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 1923, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 29}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "27a7fbcccc904b3185e1963cdd7987f6", "name": "Ireland 1922 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, constituency, 20)", "metadata": {"country": "Ireland", "year": 1922, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ireland parliamentary election 1922-06-16, sub-national (constituency) level, 20 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_cg": "CG", "votes_ct_cr": "CT/CR", "votes_ff": "FF", "votes_fp": "FP", "votes_ind": "Ind", "votes_lab": "Lab"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:56:28.639067", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.63, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.765, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.6, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.451, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.63, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.007, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 1922, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.52, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.431, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.608, "year": 1922, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.972, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 1922, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.103, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.6, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 1922, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.451, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.451, "year": 1922, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 1922, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 1922, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.928, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.057, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.057, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.653, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 1922, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 20}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2ae1d210d84f41dfbec22492ab3b6c75", "name": "Estonia 1932 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, municipality, 410)", "metadata": {"country": "Estonia", "year": 1932, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Estonia parliamentary election 1932-05-21, sub-national (municipality) level, 410 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_avk": "AVK", "votes_estp": "ESTP", "votes_ptk": "PTK", "votes_pu": "PU", "votes_rke": "RKE", "votes_rt": "RT", "votes_srv": "SRV", "votes_sttp_v": "STTP\u00dcV", "votes_vp": "VP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 410, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:56:26.546380", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.296, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.424, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.675, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.583, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.296, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 1932, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.424, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.792, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.098, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 1932, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.086, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 1932, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.459, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 1932, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.595, "year": 1932, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 1932, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.583, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.583, "year": 1932, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.565, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.565, "year": 1932, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.135, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.135, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.905, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 410}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f2b3458e8e8f438f82757af6eafae06c", "name": "Estonia 1929 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, municipality, 411)", "metadata": {"country": "Estonia", "year": 1929, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Estonia parliamentary election 1929-05-11, sub-national (municipality) level, 411 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_arv": "ARV", "votes_er": "ER", "votes_estp": "ESTP", "votes_ete": "ETE", "votes_etp": "ETP", "votes_kre": "KRE", "votes_pk": "PK", "votes_srv": "SRV", "votes_t_kvmp": "T\u00dcKVMP", "votes_vp": "VP", "votes_msl": "\u00dcMSL"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 411, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:56:24.199640", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.297, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.43, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.704, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.606, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.297, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 1929, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.43, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 1929, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1929, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.103, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 1929, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.086, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 1929, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.459, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 1929, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.595, "year": 1929, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 1929, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 1929, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.591, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 1929, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1929, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1929, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.135, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.135, "year": 1929, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1929, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 411}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d1ea684cfd2446e49ae0d78a50619463", "name": "Estonia 1926 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, municipality, 411)", "metadata": {"country": "Estonia", "year": 1926, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Estonia parliamentary election 1926-05-15, sub-national (municipality) level, 411 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_arv": "ARV", "votes_er": "ER", "votes_estp": "ESTP", "votes_ete": "ETE", "votes_etp": "ETP", "votes_etop": "EToP", "votes_kre": "KRE", "votes_ml": "ML", "votes_pk": "PK", "votes_rvp": "RVP", "votes_see": "SEE", "votes_vp": "VP", "votes_l": "\u00dcL", "votes_msl": "\u00dcMSL"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 411, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:56:22.049054", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.302, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.434, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.697, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.601, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.302, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 1926, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.434, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 1926, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1926, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.085, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 1926, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.086, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 1926, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.459, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 1926, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1926, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.697, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.697, "year": 1926, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.601, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.601, "year": 1926, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.577, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 1926, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1926, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1926, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.136, "year": 1926, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1926, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 411}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6481598f46a747968b47903b5e4c46db", "name": "Estonia 1923 \u2014 Lower house (AIEEDA interwar, municipality, 411)", "metadata": {"country": "Estonia", "year": 1923, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Estonia parliamentary election 1923-05-05, sub-national (municipality) level, 411 units. Interwar Europe. Source: AIEEDA (Archive of Interwar Europe Election Data, OSF doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QS3DG). No electorate field in the archive -> valid=cast=registered=\u03a3party votes (turnout not meaningful); forensic value is per-unit party vote counts.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_ap": "AP", "votes_dsl": "DSL", "votes_eistp": "EISTP", "votes_er": "ER", "votes_esdtp": "ESDTP", "votes_ete": "ETE", "votes_etop": "EToP", "votes_kre": "KRE", "votes_mr": "MR", "votes_other": "Other", "votes_pk": "PK", "votes_rr": "RR", "votes_rvp": "RVP", "votes_see": "SEE", "votes_svmpp": "SVMPP", "votes_t_v": "T\u00dcV", "votes_vp": "VP", "votes_l": "\u00dcL", "votes_msl": "\u00dcMSL"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 411, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-13T18:56:19.738684", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.076, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.281, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.679, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.586, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.076, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 1923, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.281, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 1923, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.555, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 1923, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.1, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 1923, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.086, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 1923, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.459, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 1923, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.402, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.601, "year": 1923, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.679, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.679, "year": 1923, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.586, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.586, "year": 1923, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.562, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 1923, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1923, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1923, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.136, "year": 1923, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 1923, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 411}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2db3456a0b0c49359347825ca584dbdb", "name": "Zambia 2006 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 150)", "metadata": {"country": "Zambia", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Zambia lower-house election 2006 (September), CONSTITUENCY level (150 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_people_s_congress_party": "All People's Congress Party", "votes_direct_democracy_movement": "Direct Democracy Movement", "votes_federal_democratic_party": "Federal Democratic Party", "votes_forum_for_democracy_and_development": "Forum For Democracy And Development", "votes_heritage_party": "Heritage Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_movement_for_multiparty_democracy": "Movement For Multiparty Democracy", "votes_national_democratic_focus": "National Democratic Focus", "votes_new_generation_party": "New Generation Party", "votes_party_for_unity_democracy_and_develo": "Party For Unity, Democracy And Development", "votes_patriotic_front": "Patriotic Front", "votes_reform_party": "Reform Party", "votes_united_democratic_alliance": "United Democratic Alliance", "votes_united_liberal_party": "United Liberal Party", "votes_united_party_for_national_developmen": "United Party For National Development", "votes_zambia_conservative_party": "Zambia Conservative Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 150, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:53:01.990550", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.511, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.805, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.498, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.418, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.511, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.805, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.487, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.537, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.384, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.037, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.584, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.396, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.523, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.498, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.498, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.418, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.418, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.311, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.311, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.203, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.203, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "MMD", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "PF", "margin": 13.94, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ZMB", "year": 2006, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 150}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "929ca13d25084a97bbcff11becb8fb9b", "name": "Zambia 2001 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 150)", "metadata": {"country": "Zambia", "year": 2001, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Zambia lower-house election 2001 (December), CONSTITUENCY level (150 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_agenda_for_zambia": "Agenda For Zambia", "votes_democratic_party": "Democratic Party", "votes_forum_for_democracy_and_development": "Forum For Democracy And Development", "votes_heritage_party": "Heritage Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_liberal_progressive_front": "Liberal Progressive Front", "votes_movement_for_multiparty_democracy": "Movement For Multiparty Democracy", "votes_national_citizens_coalition": "National Citizens' Coalition", "votes_national_leadership_for_development": "National Leadership For Development", "votes_national_party": "National Party", "votes_patriotic_front": "Patriotic Front", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party", "votes_united_national_independence_party": "United National Independence Party", "votes_united_party_for_national_developmen": "United Party For National Development", "votes_zambia_alliance_for_progress": "Zambia Alliance For Progress", "votes_zambia_progressive_party": "Zambia Progressive Party", "votes_zambia_republican_party": "Zambia Republican Party", "votes_zamibia_united_development_party": "Zamibia United Development Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 150, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:53:00.916123", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.333, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.219, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.489, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.394, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.333, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.583, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.219, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.4, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.323, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.739, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.27, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.489, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.489, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.324, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.324, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.729, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.454, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.454, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "MMD", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "United Party for National Development", "margin": 2.81, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ZMB", "year": 2001, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 150}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f74855890671466586019281abfc4201", "name": "Zambia 1996 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 150)", "metadata": {"country": "Zambia", "year": 1996, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Zambia lower-house election 1996 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (150 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_agenda_for_zambia": "Agenda For Zambia", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_liberal_progressive_front": "Liberal Progressive Front", "votes_movement_for_democratic_process": "Movement For Democratic Process", "votes_movement_for_multiparty_democracy": "Movement For Multiparty Democracy", "votes_national_congress": "National Congress", "votes_national_lima_party": "National Lima Party", "votes_national_party": "National Party", "votes_party_for_poor_people": "Party For Poor People", "votes_real_democratic_party": "Real Democratic Party", "votes_united_national_independence_party": "United National Independence Party", "votes_zambia_democratic_congress": "Zambia Democratic Congress"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 150, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:59.725678", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.371, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.612, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.49, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.384, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.371, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.593, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.612, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 1996, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.425, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.485, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 1996, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.474, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 1996, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.49, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.49, "year": 1996, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.384, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.384, "year": 1996, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.321, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.321, "year": 1996, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.744, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.729, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.584, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 1996, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.731, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.731, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "MMD", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Zambia Democratic Congress", "margin": 60.0, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ZMB", "year": 1996, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 150}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3da5b8dbdae8485c84221b2c0395276e", "name": "Zambia 1991 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 150)", "metadata": {"country": "Zambia", "year": 1991, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Zambia lower-house election 1991 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (150 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democratic_party": "Democratic Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_movement_for_multiparty_democracy": "Movement For Multiparty Democracy", "votes_national_democratic_alliance": "National Democratic Alliance", "votes_national_democratic_party": "National Democratic Party", "votes_united_national_independence_party": "United National Independence Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 150, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3, "registered_not_positive": 1, "cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:58.647209", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.572, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.05, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.287, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.248, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.572, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.643, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.05, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.245, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.61, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.04, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.26, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.014, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.254, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.523, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 1991, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.287, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.287, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.248, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.248, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.22, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.22, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.623, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.729, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.45, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.45, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.434, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1991, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "MMD", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "UNIP", "margin": 52.0, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ZMB", "year": 1991, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 150}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "16c64564192049dbbb507a826471b13f", "name": "US 2006 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 431)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 2006 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (431 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_independent": "American Independent", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_constitution": "Constitution", "votes_democrat": "Democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "Democrat-Farmer-Labor", "votes_green": "Green", "votes_independence": "Independence", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_unenrolled": "Independent (Unenrolled)", "votes_independent_american": "Independent American", "votes_independent_green": "Independent Green", "votes_let_s_do_it": "Let's Do It", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian", "votes_no_party_affiliation": "No Party Affiliation", "votes_nominated_by_petition": "Nominated by Petition", "votes_nonpartisan": "Nonpartisan", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_pacific_green": "Pacific Green", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "Peace and Freedom", "votes_progressive": "Progressive", "votes_reform": "Reform", "votes_republican": "Republican", "votes_scattering": "Scattering", "votes_socialist_workers": "Socialist Workers", "votes_u_s_taxpayers": "U.S. Taxpayers", "votes_unenrolled": "Unenrolled", "votes_unity": "Unity", "votes_wisconsin_green": "Wisconsin Green", "votes_working_families": "Working Families", "votes_write_in": "Write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 431, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 416, "registered_not_positive": 431}, "n_stations_flagged": 431, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:56.762716", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.749, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.948, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.862, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.801, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.749, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.983, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.996, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.691, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.74, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 431}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7a9319aa7ca2452490365c96bf0fd59d", "name": "US 2004 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 2004 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_others": "All Others", "votes_american_constitution": "American Constitution", "votes_american_independent": "American Independent", "votes_blank_scattering": "Blank/Scattering", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_constitution": "Constitution", "votes_constitution_party_of_florida": "Constitution Party of Florida", "votes_democrat": "Democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "Democrat-Farmer-Labor", "votes_green": "Green", "votes_independence": "Independence", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_green": "Independent (Green)", "votes_independent_libertarian": "Independent (Libertarian)", "votes_independent_u_s_marijuana_party": "Independent (U.S. Marijuana Party)", "votes_independent_american": "Independent American", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian", "votes_nonpartisan": "Nonpartisan", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "Peace and Freedom", "votes_peace_and_justice": "Peace and Justice", "votes_personal_choice": "Personal Choice", "votes_reform": "Reform", "votes_republican": "Republican", "votes_socialist": "Socialist", "votes_socialist_equality": "Socialist Equality", "votes_u_s_taxpayers": "U.S. Taxpayers", "votes_unaffiliated": "Unaffiliated", "votes_wisconsin_green": "Wisconsin Green", "votes_working_families": "Working Families", "votes_write_in": "Write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 435, "cast_gt_registered": 415}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:54.723653", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.384, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.862, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.799, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.384, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.041, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Republican", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Democratic", "margin": 6.51, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8f2d936fcfe64363839b14c971d8f5f2", "name": "US 2002 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 2002 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_independent": "American Independent", "votes_blank_scattering": "Blank/Scattering", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_constitution": "Constitution", "votes_constitution_party_of_florida": "Constitution Party of Florida", "votes_democrat": "Democrat", "votes_democrat_non_partisan_league": "Democrat - Non-Partisan League", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "Democrat-Farmer-Labor", "votes_green": "Green", "votes_illinois_green": "Illinois Green", "votes_independence": "Independence", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_green": "Independent (Green)", "votes_independent_libertarian": "Independent (Libertarian)", "votes_independent_american": "Independent American", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian", "votes_natural_law": "Natural Law", "votes_no_new_taxes": "No New Taxes", "votes_no_party_affiliation": "No Party Affiliation", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_reform": "Reform", "votes_republican": "Republican", "votes_right_to_life": "Right to Life", "votes_socialist": "Socialist", "votes_u_s_taxpayers": "U.S. Taxpayers", "votes_united_citizens": "United Citizens", "votes_wisconsin_green": "Wisconsin Green", "votes_working_families": "Working Families", "votes_write_in": "Write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 435, "cast_gt_registered": 419}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:52.829556", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.397, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.829, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.905, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.651, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1c600b5e14084995998f6360e6ad03db", "name": "US 2000 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2000, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 2000 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alaskan_independence": "Alaskan Independence", "votes_american_constitution": "American Constitution", "votes_american_independent": "American Independent", "votes_blank_scattering": "Blank/Scattering", "votes_concerned_citizens": "Concerned Citizens", "votes_conscience_for_congress": "Conscience for Congress", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_constitution": "Constitution", "votes_democrat": "Democrat", "votes_democrat_non_partisan_league": "Democrat - Non-Partisan League", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "Democrat-Farmer-Labor", "votes_democratic_liberty_union": "Democratic - Liberty Union", "votes_green": "Green", "votes_independence": "Independence", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_american": "Independent American", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian", "votes_natural_law": "Natural Law", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_pacific_green": "Pacific Green", "votes_reform": "Reform", "votes_republican": "Republican", "votes_right_to_life": "Right to Life", "votes_socialist": "Socialist", "votes_u_s_taxpayers": "U.S. Taxpayers", "votes_unenrolled": "Unenrolled", "votes_united_citizens": "United Citizens", "votes_working_families": "Working Families", "votes_write_in": "Write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 430, "registered_not_positive": 435}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:50.885097", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.855, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.489, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.867, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.808, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.489, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.823, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.748, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.691, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Republican", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Democratic", "margin": 0.93, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 2000, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "97cc83bb8f254bc9a85bcb42eea62f79", "name": "US 1998 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1998, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1998 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_heritage": "American Heritage", "votes_american_independent": "American Independent", "votes_blank_scattering": "Blank/Scattering", "votes_concerned_citizens": "Concerned Citizens", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_constitutional": "Constitutional", "votes_democrat": "Democrat", "votes_democrat_non_partisan_league": "Democrat - Non-Partisan League", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "Democrat-Farmer-Labor", "votes_green": "Green", "votes_independence": "Independence", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_american": "Independent American", "votes_legal_marijuana_now": "Legal Marijuana Now", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian", "votes_minnesota_taxpayers": "Minnesota Taxpayers", "votes_natural_law": "Natural Law", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_pacific": "Pacific", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "Peace and Freedom", "votes_reform": "Reform", "votes_republican": "Republican", "votes_right_to_life": "Right To Life", "votes_scattering": "Scattering", "votes_socialist": "Socialist", "votes_socialist_workers": "Socialist Workers", "votes_taxpayers": "Taxpayers", "votes_u_s_taxpayers": "U.S. Taxpayers", "votes_write_in": "Write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 408, "registered_not_positive": 435}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:48.828701", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.737, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.871, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.81, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.745, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "60fe9b083cc04c4ba7b9f8bf1a4a5bfa", "name": "US 1996 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 422)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1996, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1996 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (422 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_a_connecticut_party": "A Connecticut Party", "votes_american_independent": "American Independent", "votes_americans": "Americans", "votes_blank_scattering": "Blank/Scattering", "votes_concerned_citizens": "Concerned Citizens", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_democrat": "Democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "Democrat-Farmer-Labor", "votes_freedom": "Freedom", "votes_grass_roots": "Grass Roots", "votes_green": "Green", "votes_independence": "Independence", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_american": "Independent American", "votes_independent_reform": "Independent/Reform", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian", "votes_natural_law": "Natural Law", "votes_nonpartisan": "Nonpartisan", "votes_pacific": "Pacific", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "Peace and Freedom", "votes_reform": "Reform", "votes_republican": "Republican", "votes_right_to_life": "Right To Life", "votes_save_medicare": "Save Medicare", "votes_socialist": "Socialist", "votes_socialist_workers": "Socialist Workers", "votes_u_s_taxpayers": "U.S. Taxpayers", "votes_virginia_reform": "Virginia Reform", "votes_write_in": "Write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 422, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 422, "cast_gt_registered": 413}, "n_stations_flagged": 422, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:46.859792", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.737, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.888, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.869, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.808, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.905, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.278, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.749, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.706, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Republican", "margin": 40.9, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1996, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 422}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "26bd212423124bc5aa266b14d6387e5b", "name": "US 1994 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1994, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1994 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_a_connecticut_party": "A Connecticut Party", "votes_american": "American", "votes_american_independent": "American Independent", "votes_concerned_citizens": "Concerned Citizens", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_democrat": "Democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "Democrat-Farmer-Labor", "votes_grass_roots": "Grass Roots", "votes_green": "Green", "votes_gun_control": "Gun Control", "votes_independence_fusion": "Independence Fusion", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_american": "Independent American", "votes_independent_maine_greens": "Independent Maine Greens", "votes_independent_nomination": "Independent Nomination", "votes_independent_republican": "Independent-Republican", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian", "votes_mississippi_taxpayers": "Mississippi Taxpayers", "votes_natural_law": "Natural Law", "votes_no_party_affiliation": "No Party Affiliation", "votes_patriot": "Patriot", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "Peace and Freedom", "votes_republican": "Republican", "votes_right_to_life": "Right-To-Life", "votes_right_to_life_2": "Right-to-Life", "votes_scattering": "Scattering", "votes_taxpayers": "Taxpayers", "votes_u_s_taxpayers": "U.S. Taxpayers", "votes_write_in": "Write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 435, "cast_gt_registered": 416}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:44.970318", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.734, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.867, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.806, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.734, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.267, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.746, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.705, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.705, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "90d07a9992234d77b9a5aaf2fcbdc2b4", "name": "US 1992 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1992, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1992 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_a_connecticut_party": "A Connecticut Party", "votes_alaskan_independence": "Alaskan Independence", "votes_american_grass_roots_alternative": "American Grass Roots Alternative", "votes_concerned_citizens": "Concerned Citizens", "votes_conservative": "Conservative", "votes_democrat": "Democrat", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "Democrat-Farmer-Labor", "votes_economic_recovery": "Economic Recovery", "votes_for_the_people": "For The People", "votes_grass_roots": "Grass Roots", "votes_green": "Green", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_voters": "Independent Voters", "votes_independent_for_change": "Independent for Change", "votes_independent_republican": "Independent-Republican", "votes_independents_for_perot": "Independents for Perot", "votes_liberal": "Liberal", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian", "votes_louanner_peters_party": "Louanner Peters Party", "votes_natural_law": "Natural Law", "votes_no_party_affiliation": "No Party Affiliation", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "Peace and Freedom", "votes_perot_choice": "Perot Choice", "votes_republican": "Republican", "votes_right_to_life": "Right-To-Life", "votes_scattering": "Scattering", "votes_unenrolled": "Unenrolled", "votes_unenrolled_independent": "Unenrolled/Independent", "votes_write_in": "Write-in", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 422, "registered_not_positive": 435}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:42.960539", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.731, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.895, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.872, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.809, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.731, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.272, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 1992, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.872, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.809, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.706, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Republican", "margin": 37.54, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1992, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "63b334eeabd54fcd88f67c901f3f9cbc", "name": "UK 1997 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 659)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1997, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1997 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (659 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_party": "Alliance Party", "votes_british_national_party": "British National Party", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_democratic_unionist_party": "Democratic Unionist Party", "votes_green_party": "Green Party", "votes_independent_conservatives": "Independent Conservatives", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberal_democrat_party": "Liberal Democrat Party", "votes_liberal_party": "Liberal Party", "votes_monster_raving_loony_party": "Monster Raving Loony Party", "votes_national_democrats": "National Democrats", "votes_national_front": "National Front", "votes_natural_law_party": "Natural Law Party", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_pro_life": "Pro-Life", "votes_progressive_unionists": "Progressive Unionists", "votes_rainbow_dream_ticket": "Rainbow Dream Ticket", "votes_referendum_party": "Referendum Party", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_scottish_socialist_alliance": "Scottish Socialist Alliance", "votes_sinn_f_in": "Sinn F\u00e9in", "votes_social_democratic_and_labour_party": "Social Democratic and Labour Party", "votes_socialist_labour": "Socialist Labour", "votes_socialists": "Socialists", "votes_uk_independence_party": "UK Independence Party", "votes_uk_unionist_party": "UK Unionist Party", "votes_ulster_unionist_party": "Ulster Unionist Party", "votes_workers_party": "Workers' Party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 659, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:40.467026", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.601, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.948, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.811, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.746, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.042, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.2, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.746, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.671, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 659}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "607da9964d9247cfa6391cff3e383195", "name": "UK 1992 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 651)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1992, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1992 (April), CONSTITUENCY level (651 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_party": "Alliance Party", "votes_anti_federal_league": "Anti-Federal League", "votes_british_national_party": "British National Party", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_democratic_unionist_party": "Democratic Unionist Party", "votes_ecology_party": "Ecology Party", "votes_independent_conservatives": "Independent Conservatives", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independent_unionists": "Independent Unionists", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_islamic_party": "Islamic Party", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_labour_and_trade_union_party": "Labour and Trade Union Party", "votes_liberal_democrat_party": "Liberal Democrat Party", "votes_liberal_party": "Liberal Party", "votes_monster_raving_loony_party": "Monster Raving Loony Party", "votes_national_front": "National Front", "votes_natural_law_party": "Natural Law Party", "votes_new_agenda": "New Agenda", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_progressive_socialists": "Progressive Socialists", "votes_raving_loony_green_giant_party": "Raving Loony Green Giant Party", "votes_scottish_militant_labour": "Scottish Militant Labour", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_sinn_f_in": "Sinn F\u00e9in", "votes_social_democratic_and_labour_party": "Social Democratic and Labour Party", "votes_social_democrats": "Social Democrats", "votes_ulster_popular_unionist_party": "Ulster Popular Unionist Party", "votes_ulster_unionist_party": "Ulster Unionist Party", "votes_workers_party": "Workers' Party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 651, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2, "registered_not_positive": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:37.531200", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.605, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.815, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.742, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.605, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.413, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 1992, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.243, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.742, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.653, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 1992, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 651}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ba113c546c054f688bd7d2bab27241fe", "name": "Thailand 1992 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 142)", "metadata": {"country": "Thailand", "year": 1992, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Thailand lower-house election 1992 (September), CONSTITUENCY level (142 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_chart_pattana": "CHART PATTANA", "votes_chart_thai": "CHART THAI", "votes_ekaphap": "EKAPHAP", "votes_khwamwang_mai": "KHWAMWANG MAI", "votes_kit_sangkhom": "KIT SANGKHOM", "votes_muan_chon": "MUAN CHON", "votes_palang_prachachon": "PALANG PRACHACHON", "votes_palangtham": "PALANGTHAM", "votes_prachacornthai": "PRACHACORNTHAI", "votes_prachathipat": "PRACHATHIPAT", "votes_rassadorn": "RASSADORN", "votes_seritham": "SERITHAM"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 142, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 142, "cast_gt_registered": 142}, "n_stations_flagged": 142, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:36.294173", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.48, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.37, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.271, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.2, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.48, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.62, "year": 1992, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.37, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.617, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 1992, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.622, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.406, "year": 1992, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.162, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.041, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.999, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.5, "year": 1992, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.164, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.271, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.271, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.2, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.2, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.147, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.147, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.509, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.509, "year": 1992, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.647, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 1992, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 142}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e4cef06fe16d41cbae53bd8463822449", "name": "Philippines 2010 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 228)", "metadata": {"country": "Philippines", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Philippines lower-house election 2010 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (228 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_aksyon_demokratiko": "Aksyon Demokratiko", "votes_ang_kapatiran": "Ang Kapatiran", "votes_aton_tamdon_utod_negrosanon": "Aton Tamdon Utod Negrosanon", "votes_bagumbayan_volunteers_for_a_new_phil": "Bagumbayan-Volunteers for a New Philippines", "votes_bangon_pilipinas": "Bangon Pilipinas", "votes_bigkis_pinoy_movement": "Bigkis Pinoy Movement", "votes_buklod": "Buklod", "votes_gabay_ng_bayan": "Gabay Ng Bayan", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_katipunan_ng_bagong_caloocan": "Katipunan Ng Bagong Caloocan", "votes_kilusang_bagong_lipunan": "Kilusang Bagong Lipunan", "votes_kugi_uswag_sugbu": "Kugi Uswag Sugbu", "votes_lp_kkk": "LP / KKK", "votes_laban_ng_demokratikong_pilipino": "Laban Ng Demokratikong Pilipino", "votes_laban_para_sa_kapayapaan_katarungan_": "Laban Para Sa Kapayapaan, Katarungan At Kaunlaran", "votes_lakas_kabalikat_ng_malayang_pilipino": "Lakas-Kabalikat Ng Malayang Pilipino-Demokratikong Kristiyano At Muslim", "votes_lingkod_bayan_sulong_taguig_coalitio": "Lingkod Bayan-Sulong Taguig Coalition", "votes_mindoro_sandugo_para_sa_kaunlaran": "Mindoro Sandugo Para Sa Kaunlaran", "votes_np_asenso_manila": "NP / ASENSO MANILA", "votes_nationalist_people_s_coalition": "Nationalist People's Coalition", "votes_partido_demokratiko_pilipino_lakas_n": "Partido Demokratiko Pilipino-Lakas Ng Bayan", "votes_partido_demokratiko_sosyalista_ng_pi": "Partido Demokratiko Sosyalista Ng Pilipinas", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas", "votes_partido_nacionalista": "Partido Nacionalista", "votes_partido_ng_manggagawa_at_magsasaka": "Partido Ng Manggagawa At Magsasaka", "votes_peoples_champ_movement": "Peoples Champ Movement", "votes_philippine_grren_republican_party": "Philippine Grren Republican Party", "votes_pwersa_ng_masang_pilipino": "Pwersa Ng Masang Pilipino", "votes_sarangani_reconciliation_and_reforma": "Sarangani Reconciliation and Reformation Organization", "votes_ugyon_kita_capiz": "Ugyon Kita Capiz", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 228, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 212, "registered_not_positive": 228}, "n_stations_flagged": 228, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:29.952530", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.932, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.621, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.506, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.395, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.621, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.746, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.537, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.384, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.731, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.683, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.27, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.27, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.755, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Liberal", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "PMP", "margin": 18.9, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PHL", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 228}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "17d7bc535b024758a8058f89b3a66349", "name": "Philippines 2007 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 219)", "metadata": {"country": "Philippines", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Philippines lower-house election 2007 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (219 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_aksyon_demokratiko": "Aksyon Demokratiko", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_kampi_balane": "KAMPI / BALANE", "votes_kampi_ldp": "KAMPI / LDP", "votes_kampi_padajon_surigao": "KAMPI / PADAJON SURIGAO", "votes_kampi_una": "KAMPI / UNA", "votes_kabalikat_ng_malayang_pilipino": "Kabalikat Ng Malayang Pilipino", "votes_kilusang_diwa_ng_taguig": "Kilusang Diwa Ng Taguig", "votes_ldp_uno": "LDP / UNO", "votes_lp_pdp_laban": "LP / PDP-Laban", "votes_lp_uno": "LP / UNO", "votes_laban_ng_demokratikong_pilipino": "Laban Ng Demokratikong Pilipino", "votes_lakas_cmd_bopk": "Lakas-CMD / BOPK", "votes_lakas_cmd_lp": "Lakas-CMD / LP", "votes_lakas_cmd_sarro": "Lakas-CMD / SARRO", "votes_lakas_cmd_una": "Lakas-CMD / UNA", "votes_lakas_christian_muslim_democrats": "Lakas-Christian Muslim Democrats", "votes_lapiang_bagong_lakas_ng_nueva_ecija": "Lapiang Bagong Lakas Ng Nueva Ecija", "votes_np_uno": "NP / UNO", "votes_npc_una": "NPC / UNA", "votes_nagkakaisang_oposisyon": "Nagkakaisang Oposisyon", "votes_nationalist_people_s_coalition": "Nationalist People's Coalition", "votes_ompia_pdsp": "OMPIA / PDSP", "votes_pdp_laban_uno": "PDP-Laban / UNO", "votes_pmp_uno": "PMP / UNO", "votes_partido_demokratiko_pilipino_lakas_n": "Partido Demokratiko Pilipino-Lakas Ng Bayan", "votes_partido_demokratiko_sosyalista_ng_pi": "Partido Demokratiko Sosyalista Ng Pilipinas", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas", "votes_partido_nacionalista": "Partido Nacionalista", "votes_pwersa_ng_masang_pilipino": "Pwersa Ng Masang Pilipino", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 219, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 219, "cast_gt_registered": 210}, "n_stations_flagged": 219, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:28.703324", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.423, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.284, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.459, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.346, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.423, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.424, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.376, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.344, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.361, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.692, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.673, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.346, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.346, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.239, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.239, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.685, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.684, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.684, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 219}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7435f1f45c6546d4bec70d0c31df174e", "name": "Philippines 2004 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 210)", "metadata": {"country": "Philippines", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Philippines lower-house election 2004 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (210 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_990": "-990", "votes_aksyon_demokratiko": "Aksyon Demokratiko", "votes_buklod_capampangan": "Buklod Capampangan", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_masa": "Independent / MASA", "votes_kampi_ldp": "KAMPI / LDP", "votes_kabalikat_ng_malayang_pilipino": "Kabalikat Ng Malayang Pilipino", "votes_koalisyon_ng_nagkakaisang_pilipino": "Koalisyon Ng Nagkakaisang Pilipino", "votes_kugi_uswag_sugbu": "Kugi Uswag Sugbu", "votes_ldp_knp": "LDP / KNP", "votes_ldp_partido_magdalo": "LDP / PARTIDO MAGDALO", "votes_laban_ng_demokratikong_pilipino": "Laban Ng Demokratikong Pilipino", "votes_lakas_cmd_bopk": "Lakas-CMD / BOPK", "votes_lakas_cmd_kabatak": "Lakas-CMD / KABATAK", "votes_lakas_cmd_kampi": "Lakas-CMD / KAMPI", "votes_lakas_cmd_lp": "Lakas-CMD / LP", "votes_lakas_cmd_npc": "Lakas-CMD / NPC", "votes_lakas_cmd_padayon_pilipino": "Lakas-CMD / PADAYON PILIPINO", "votes_lakas_christian_muslim_democrats": "Lakas-Christian Muslim Democrats", "votes_npc_aim": "NPC / AIM", "votes_npc_balane": "NPC / BALANE", "votes_npc_ina": "NPC / INA", "votes_npc_una": "NPC / UNA", "votes_nationalist_people_s_coalition": "Nationalist People's Coalition", "votes_partido_demokratiko_pilipino_lakas_n": "Partido Demokratiko Pilipino-Lakas Ng Bayan", "votes_partido_demokratiko_sosyalista_ng_pi": "Partido Demokratiko Sosyalista Ng Pilipinas", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas", "votes_partido_nacionalista": "Partido Nacionalista", "votes_pwersa_ng_masang_pilipino": "Pwersa Ng Masang Pilipino", "votes_reporma_lm": "Reporma / LM", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 210, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 210, "cast_gt_registered": 181}, "n_stations_flagged": 210, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:27.435722", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.783, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.695, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.486, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.354, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.446, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.695, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.635, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.361, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.486, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.486, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.354, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.354, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.252, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.252, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.7, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.69, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.69, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Lakas-CMD (K4)", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "KNP", "margin": 3.98, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PHL", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 210}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "adc3a274dff7496ebc54ec11afec2997", "name": "Philippines 2001 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 208)", "metadata": {"country": "Philippines", "year": 2001, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Philippines lower-house election 2001 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (208 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_990": "-990", "votes_alayon_bakud": "ALAYON / BAKUD", "votes_akbayan": "Akbayan", "votes_aksyon_demokratiko": "Aksyon Demokratiko", "votes_alayon_alang_sa_kalambu_an_ng_kalina": "Alayon Alang Sa Kalambu-An Ng Kalinaw", "votes_cotabato_united_people_s_movement": "Cotabato United People's Movement", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_kabalikat_ng_malayang_pilipino": "Kabalikat Ng Malayang Pilipino", "votes_kabayani": "Kabayani", "votes_katipunan_ng_bagong_caloocan": "Katipunan Ng Bagong Caloocan", "votes_kilusang_bagong_lipunan": "Kilusang Bagong Lipunan", "votes_kugi_uswag_sugbu": "Kugi Uswag Sugbu", "votes_laban_ng_demokratikong_pilipino": "Laban Ng Demokratikong Pilipino", "votes_laban_ng_makabayang_masang_pilipino": "Laban Ng Makabayang Masang Pilipino", "votes_lakas_national_union_of_christian_de": "Lakas-National Union of Christian Democrats-United Muslim Democrats of the Philippines", "votes_nationalist_people_s_coalition": "Nationalist People's Coalition", "votes_ompia_party": "Ompia Party", "votes_partido_demokratiko_pilipino_lakas_n": "Partido Demokratiko Pilipino-Lakas Ng Bayan", "votes_partido_demokratiko_sosyalista_ng_pi": "Partido Demokratiko Sosyalista Ng Pilipinas", "votes_partido_isang_bansa_isang_diwa": "Partido Isang Bansa Isang Diwa", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas", "votes_partido_nacionalista": "Partido Nacionalista", "votes_partido_para_sa_demokratikong_reporm": "Partido Para Sa Demokratikong Reporma", "votes_people_power_coalition": "People Power Coalition", "votes_probinsya_muna_development_initiativ": "Probinsya Muna Development Initiatives", "votes_pwersa_ng_masang_pilipino": "Pwersa Ng Masang Pilipino", "votes_reporma_lm": "Reporma / LM", "votes_rizalist_party": "Rizalist Party", "votes_united_negros_alliance": "United Negros Alliance"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 208, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 208, "cast_gt_registered": 196}, "n_stations_flagged": 208, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:26.084791", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.911, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.704, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.545, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.409, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.911, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.704, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.799, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.45, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.364, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.586, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.397, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.409, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.409, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.284, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.284, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.716, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.685, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 208}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fa5113fa0a894015a88303f8d36ef7fb", "name": "Philippines 1998 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 207)", "metadata": {"country": "Philippines", "year": 1998, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Philippines lower-house election 1998 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (207 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_990": "-990", "votes_aksyon_demokratiko": "Aksyon Demokratiko", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_kabalikat_ng_malayang_pilipino": "Kabalikat Ng Malayang Pilipino", "votes_kilusan_para_sa_pambansang_pagpapani": "Kilusan Para Sa Pambansang Pagpapanibago", "votes_kilusang_bagong_lipunan": "Kilusang Bagong Lipunan", "votes_laban_ng_makabayang_masang_pilipino": "Laban Ng Makabayang Masang Pilipino", "votes_lakas_national_union_of_christian_de": "Lakas-National Union of Christian Democrats-United Muslim Democrats of the Philippines", "votes_lapiang_manggagawa": "Lapiang Manggagawa", "votes_nationalist_people_s_coalition": "Nationalist People's Coalition", "votes_ompia_party": "Ompia Party", "votes_partido_demokratiko_pilipino_lakas_n": "Partido Demokratiko Pilipino-Lakas Ng Bayan", "votes_partido_demokratiko_sosyalista_ng_pi": "Partido Demokratiko Sosyalista Ng Pilipinas", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas", "votes_partido_nacionalista": "Partido Nacionalista", "votes_partido_ng_masang_pilipino": "Partido Ng Masang Pilipino", "votes_partido_para_sa_demokratikong_reporm": "Partido Para Sa Demokratikong Reporma", "votes_partido_reporma_ng_pilipinas": "Partido Reporma Ng Pilipinas", "votes_probinsya_muna_development_initiativ": "Probinsya Muna Development Initiatives", "votes_progressive_party_of_the_philippines": "Progressive Party of the Philippines"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 207, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 207, "cast_gt_registered": 197}, "n_stations_flagged": 207, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:24.567463", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.606, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.579, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.428, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.606, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.203, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.923, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.731, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.728, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.432, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.563, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.428, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.428, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.305, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.305, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.735, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.707, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.707, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "LAMMP", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Lakas", "margin": 34.49, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PHL", "year": 1998, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 207}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c43ecd8e0c04482da1d40cffb6df5d8e", "name": "Philippines 1995 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 203)", "metadata": {"country": "Philippines", "year": 1995, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Philippines lower-house election 1995 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (203 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_990": "-990", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_independent_nacionalista_and_allies": "Independent Nacionalista and Allies", "votes_islamic_party_of_the_philippines": "Islamic Party of the Philippines", "votes_kilusang_bagong_lipunan": "Kilusang Bagong Lipunan", "votes_laban_ng_demokratikong_pilipino": "Laban Ng Demokratikong Pilipino", "votes_lakas_nucd_umdp": "Lakas-NUCD-UMDP", "votes_lakas_national_union_of_christian_de": "Lakas-National Union of Christian Democrats-United Muslim Democrats of the Philippines", "votes_lapiang_manggagawa": "Lapiang Manggagawa", "votes_nationalist_people_s_coalition": "Nationalist People's Coalition", "votes_partido_demokratiko_pilipino_lakas_n": "Partido Demokratiko Pilipino-Lakas Ng Bayan", "votes_partido_demokratiko_sosyalista_ng_pi": "Partido Demokratiko Sosyalista Ng Pilipinas", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas", "votes_partido_nacionalista": "Partido Nacionalista", "votes_partido_nacionalista_ng_pilipinas": "Partido Nacionalista Ng Pilipinas", "votes_partido_ng_masang_pilipino": "Partido Ng Masang Pilipino", "votes_partido_reporma_ng_pilipinas": "Partido Reporma Ng Pilipinas"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 203, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 179, "registered_not_positive": 203}, "n_stations_flagged": 203, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:23.297200", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.762, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.985, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.55, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.414, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.985, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.086, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.568, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 1995, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.923, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.731, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.728, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.432, "year": 1995, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.079, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.52, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.55, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.414, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.414, "year": 1995, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.289, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.743, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.707, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.707, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.707, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.707, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 203}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2acd0155500f4f68925e8dc8b2446dc8", "name": "Philippines 1992 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 199)", "metadata": {"country": "Philippines", "year": 1992, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Philippines lower-house election 1992 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (199 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_esp": "ESP", "votes_ilongos": "ILONGOS", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_kbl_np": "KBL / NP", "votes_kbl_npc": "KBL / NPC", "votes_kbl_npc_ppp": "KBL / NPC / PPP", "votes_kbl_npc_ppp_gad": "KBL / NPC / PPP / GAD", "votes_kbl_npc_ppp_np": "KBL / NPC / PPP / NP", "votes_kbl_ppp_np": "KBL / PPP / NP", "votes_kilusang_bagong_lipunan": "Kilusang Bagong Lipunan", "votes_ldp_np": "LDP / NP", "votes_ldp_partido_magdalo": "LDP / PARTIDO MAGDALO", "votes_lp_pdp_laban": "LP / PDP-Laban", "votes_laban_ng_demokratikong_pilipino": "Laban Ng Demokratikong Pilipino", "votes_lakas_nucd_umdp_lp": "Lakas-NUCD-UMDP / LP", "votes_lakas_nucd_umdp_lp_pdp_laban_np": "Lakas-NUCD-UMDP / LP / PDP-Laban / NP", "votes_lakas_nucd_umdp_npc_ldp_ppp": "Lakas-NUCD-UMDP / NPC / LDP / PPP", "votes_lakas_national_union_of_christian_de": "Lakas-National Union of Christian Democrats-United Muslim Democrats of the Philippines", "votes_move_makati": "Move Makati", "votes_npc_balane": "NPC / BALANE", "votes_npc_np": "NPC / NP", "votes_npc_ppp": "NPC / PPP", "votes_npc_ppp_pagtinabangay": "NPC / PPP / PAGTINABANGAY", "votes_nationalist_people_s_coalition": "Nationalist People's Coalition", "votes_partido_demokratiko_pilipino_lakas_n": "Partido Demokratiko Pilipino-Lakas Ng Bayan", "votes_partido_liberal_ng_pilipinas": "Partido Liberal Ng Pilipinas", "votes_partido_nacionalista": "Partido Nacionalista", "votes_partido_ng_masang_pilipino": "Partido Ng Masang Pilipino", "votes_partido_panaghiusa": "Partido Panaghiusa", "votes_partido_reporma_ng_pilipinas": "Partido Reporma Ng Pilipinas", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 199, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 190, "registered_not_positive": 199}, "n_stations_flagged": 199, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:22.031359", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.494, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.039, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.555, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.425, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.494, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 1992, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.039, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.68, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.42, "year": 1992, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.056, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.678, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.419, "year": 1992, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.243, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 1992, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 1992, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.425, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.425, "year": 1992, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.293, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.293, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.743, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.702, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Lakas", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "PRP", "margin": 6.28, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PHL", "year": 1992, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 199}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c7e079667b464ec6bfa93cae8fc075bd", "name": "Pakistan 2008 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 272)", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Pakistan lower-house election 2008 (February), CONSTITUENCY level (272 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_awami_himayat_tehreek_pakistan": "Awami Himayat Tehreek Pakistan", "votes_awami_national_party": "Awami National Party", "votes_azad_pakistan_party": "Azad Pakistan Party", "votes_balochistan_national_party_awami": "Balochistan National Party (Awami)", "votes_hazara_democratic_party": "Hazara Democratic Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jamait_ahle_hadith_pakistan_elahi_za": "Jamait Ahle-Hadith Pakistan (Elahi Zaheer)", "votes_jamhoori_wattan_party": "Jamhoori Wattan Party", "votes_jamiat_ulama_e_islam_s": "Jamiat Ulama-e-Islam (S)", "votes_muttahida_qaumi_movement_pakistan": "Muttahida Qaumi Movement Pakistan", "votes_mutthida_majlis_e_amal_pakistan_mma": "Mutthida Majlis-e-Amal Pakistan (MMA)", "votes_national_party": "National Party", "votes_national_peoples_party": "National Peoples Party", "votes_pak_muslim_alliance": "Pak Muslim Alliance", "votes_pakistan_awami_party": "Pakistan Awami Party", "votes_pakistan_bachao_party": "Pakistan Bachao Party", "votes_pakistan_citizen_movement": "Pakistan Citizen Movement", "votes_pakistan_democratic_party": "Pakistan Democratic Party", "votes_pakistan_muhafiz_party": "Pakistan Muhafiz Party", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league": "Pakistan Muslim League", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_f": "Pakistan Muslim League (F)", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_n": "Pakistan Muslim League (N)", "votes_pakistan_peoples_party_shaheed_bhutt": "Pakistan Peoples Party (Shaheed Bhutto)", "votes_pakistan_peoples_party_sherpao": "Pakistan Peoples Party (Sherpao)", "votes_pakistan_peoples_party_parliamentari": "Pakistan Peoples Party Parliamentarians", "votes_pakistan_tehrek_e_inqalab": "Pakistan Tehrek-e-Inqalab", "votes_pasban": "Pasban", "votes_punjab_national_party": "Punjab National Party", "votes_sindh_united_party": "Sindh United Party", "votes_sunni_tehreek": "Sunni Tehreek", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 272, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 198, "registered_not_positive": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 200, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:20.540698", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.505, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.593, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.416, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.223, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.505, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.626, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.593, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.489, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.237, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.048, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.472, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.416, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.416, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.223, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.223, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.5, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.5, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 272}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9071babd0055488c88055c87331451e7", "name": "Pakistan 2002 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 272)", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Pakistan lower-house election 2002 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (272 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_awami_national_party": "Awami National Party", "votes_balochistan_national_democratic_part": "Balochistan National Democratic Party", "votes_balochistan_national_movement": "Balochistan National Movement", "votes_balochistan_national_party": "Balochistan National Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_jamhoori_wattan_party": "Jamhoori Wattan Party", "votes_jamote_qami_movement": "Jamote Qami Movement", "votes_kazmi_nazim_e_mistafa": "Kazmi Nazim-e-Mistafa", "votes_muttahida_qaumi_movement_pakistan": "Muttahida Qaumi Movement Pakistan", "votes_mutthida_majlis_e_amal_pakistan_mma": "Mutthida Majlis-e-Amal Pakistan (MMA)", "votes_national_alliance": "National Alliance", "votes_pak_muslim_alliance": "Pak Muslim Alliance", "votes_pakistan_awami_tehreek": "Pakistan Awami Tehreek", "votes_pakistan_democratic_party": "Pakistan Democratic Party", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_f": "Pakistan Muslim League (F)", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_n": "Pakistan Muslim League (N)", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_j": "Pakistan Muslim League(J)", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_qa": "Pakistan Muslim League(QA)", "votes_pakistan_muslim_league_z": "Pakistan Muslim League(Z)", "votes_pakistan_pakhtoonkhawa_milli_awami_p": "Pakistan Pakhtoonkhawa Milli Awami Party", "votes_pakistan_peoples_party_shaheed_bhutt": "Pakistan Peoples Party (Shaheed Bhutto)", "votes_pakistan_peoples_party_sherpao": "Pakistan Peoples Party (Sherpao)", "votes_pakistan_peoples_party_parliamentari": "Pakistan Peoples Party Parliamentarians", "votes_pakistan_shia_political_party": "Pakistan Shia Political Party", "votes_pakistan_tehreek_e_insaf": "Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf", "votes_qaumi_jamhoori_party": "Qaumi Jamhoori Party", "votes_qaumi_movement_pakistan": "Qaumi Movement Pakistan", "votes_saleem_pakistan_tehreek_e_insaf": "Saleem Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf", "votes_sunni_tehreek": "Sunni Tehreek", "votes_tehrik_e_istaqlal": "Tehrik-e-Istaqlal", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 272, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:18.989390", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.824, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.932, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.243, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.132, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.483, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.463, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.334, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.084, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.775, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.444, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.343, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.336, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.164, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.291, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.243, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.243, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.132, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.132, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.096, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.096, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.473, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.473, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.433, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.433, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 272}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f19268ee96704769ab106d3b3a7ec33b", "name": "Nigeria 2003 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 345)", "metadata": {"country": "Nigeria", "year": 2003, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Nigeria lower-house election 2003 (January), CONSTITUENCY level (345 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_african_renaissance_party": "African Renaissance Party", "votes_all_nigeria_people_s_party": "All Nigeria People's Party", "votes_all_people_s_liberation_party": "All People's Liberation Party", "votes_all_progressive_grand_alliance": "All Progressive Grand Alliance", "votes_alliance_for_democracy": "Alliance for Democracy", "votes_better_nigeria_progressive_party": "Better Nigeria Progressive Party", "votes_community_party_of_nigeria": "Community Party of Nigeria", "votes_democratic_alliance": "Democratic Alliance", "votes_green_party": "Green Party", "votes_justice_party": "Justice Party", "votes_liberal_democratic_party_of_nigeria": "Liberal Democratic Party of Nigeria", "votes_masses_movement_of_nigeria": "Masses Movement of Nigeria", "votes_movement_for_democracy_and_justice": "Movement for Democracy and Justice", "votes_national_action_council": "National Action Council", "votes_national_advance_party": "National Advance Party", "votes_national_conscience_party": "National Conscience Party", "votes_national_democratic_party": "National Democratic Party", "votes_national_mass_movement_of_nigeria": "National Mass Movement of Nigeria", "votes_national_reformation_party": "National Reformation Party", "votes_new_democrats": "New Democrats", "votes_new_nigeria_people_s_party": "New Nigeria People's Party", "votes_nigeria_people_s_congress": "Nigeria People's Congress", "votes_party_for_social_democracy": "Party for Social Democracy", "votes_people_s_democratic_party": "People's Democratic Party", "votes_people_s_mandate_party": "People's Mandate Party", "votes_people_s_redemption_party": "People's Redemption Party", "votes_people_s_salvation_party": "People's Salvation Party", "votes_progressive_action_congress": "Progressive Action Congress", "votes_united_democratic_party": "United Democratic Party", "votes_united_nigeria_people_s_party": "United Nigeria People's Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 345, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 345, "registered_not_positive": 345}, "n_stations_flagged": 345, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:17.229063", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.275, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.428, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.304, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.275, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.319, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.486, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.407, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.102, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.396, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.771, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.686, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.428, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.428, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.304, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.304, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.242, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.242, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.636, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.636, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.5, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.5, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "PDP", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "ANPP", "margin": 29.75, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "NGA", "year": 2003, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 345}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "08226ae7fb494427bcbf849316dc1c2b", "name": "Nepal 2008 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 240)", "metadata": {"country": "Nepal", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Nepal lower-house election 2008 (April), CONSTITUENCY level (240 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_churebhavar_rastriya_ekata_party_nep": "Churebhavar Rastriya Ekata Party Nepal", "votes_communist_party_of_nepal_maoist": "Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist)", "votes_communist_party_of_nepal_marxist_len": "Communist Party of Nepal (Marxist-Leninist)", "votes_communist_party_of_nepal_unified": "Communist Party of Nepal (Unified)", "votes_communist_party_of_nepal_unified_mar": "Communist Party of Nepal (Unified-Marxist- Leninist)", "votes_communist_party_of_nepal_united_marx": "Communist Party of Nepal (United Marxist)", "votes_communist_party_of_nepal_united": "Communist Party of Nepal (United)", "votes_dalit_jajati_party": "Dalit Jajati Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_janamorcha_nepal": "Janamorcha Nepal", "votes_lok_kalaynkari_janata_party_nepal": "Lok Kalaynkari Janata Party Nepal", "votes_madeshi_jana_adhikar_forum_nepal": "Madeshi Jana Adhikar Forum Nepal", "votes_mangol_national_organization": "Mangol National Organization", "votes_nepa_rastriya_party": "Nepa: Rastriya Party", "votes_nepal_janata_party": "Nepal Janata Party", "votes_nepal_majdoor_kisan_party": "Nepal Majdoor Kisan Party", "votes_nepal_shadvawana_party_ananda_devi": "Nepal Shadvawana Party (Ananda Devi)", "votes_nepal_loktantrik_samajbadi_dal": "Nepal-Loktantrik Samajbadi Dal", "votes_nepali_congress": "Nepali Congress", "votes_nepali_janatadal": "Nepali Janatadal", "votes_rastriay_janamukti_party": "Rastriay Janamukti Party", "votes_rastriya_janasshakti_party": "Rastriya Janasshakti Party", "votes_rastriya_janata_dal": "Rastriya Janata Dal", "votes_rastriya_janmorcha": "Rastriya Janmorcha", "votes_rastriya_prajatantra_party": "Rastriya Prajatantra Party", "votes_rastriya_prajatantra_party_nepal": "Rastriya Prajatantra Party Nepal", "votes_samajbadi_prajatantrik_janata_party_": "Samajbadi Prajatantrik Janata Party Nepal", "votes_sanghiya_loktantrik_rastriay_manch": "Sanghiya Loktantrik Rastriay Manch", "votes_shadbhavana_party": "Shadbhavana Party", "votes_terai_madesh_loktantrik_party": "Terai-Madesh Loktantrik Party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 240, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 240, "registered_not_positive": 240}, "n_stations_flagged": 240, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:15.749682", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.367, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.729, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.478, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.413, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.367, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.592, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.729, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.326, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.733, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.433, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.983, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.828, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.478, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.478, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.413, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.359, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.359, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.798, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 240}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4e2aef4608914bb095307e742c2cdd87", "name": "Mexico 2006 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 300)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Mexico lower-house election 2006 (July), CONSTITUENCY level (300 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alianza_por_m_xico": "Alianza por M\u00e9xico", "votes_coalici_n_por_el_bien_de_todos": "Coalici\u00f3n por el Bien de Todos", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_partido_acci_n_nacional": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional", "votes_partido_alternativa_socialdem_crata_": "Partido Alternativa Socialdem\u00f3crata y Campesina", "votes_partido_nueva_alianza": "Partido Nueva Alianza"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 300, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 300, "cast_gt_registered": 300}, "n_stations_flagged": 300, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:14.139157", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.292, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.259, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.674, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.478, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.292, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.259, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.565, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.379, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.159, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.151, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.681, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.42, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.674, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.478, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.478, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.346, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.346, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.685, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.609, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional (PAN)", "winner_candidate": "Felipe Calder\u00f3n", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Alianza por el Bien de Todos (PRD/PT/PC)", "margin": 0.6, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MEX", "year": 2006, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 300}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b0e83d6270c74a7c927b38215cfb8ced", "name": "Mexico 2003 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 298)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2003, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Mexico lower-house election 2003 (July), CONSTITUENCY level (298 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alianza_para_todos": "Alianza para Todos", "votes_convergencia_por_la_democracia": "Convergencia por la Democracia", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_partido_acci_n_nacional": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional", "votes_partido_alianza_social": "Partido Alianza Social", "votes_partido_fuerza_ciudadana": "Partido Fuerza Ciudadana", "votes_partido_liberal_mexicano": "Partido Liberal Mexicano", "votes_partido_m_xico_posible": "Partido M\u00e9xico Posible", "votes_partido_revolucionario_institucional": "Partido Revolucionario Institucional", "votes_partido_verde_ecologista_de_m_xico": "Partido Verde Ecologista de M\u00e9xico", "votes_partido_de_la_revoluci_n_dem_cratica": "Partido de la Revoluci\u00f3n Dem\u00f3cratica", "votes_partido_de_la_sociedad_nacionalista": "Partido de la Sociedad Nacionalista", "votes_partido_del_trabajo": "Partido del Trabajo"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 298, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 298, "cast_gt_registered": 298}, "n_stations_flagged": 298, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:12.721286", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.582, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.702, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.499, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.012, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.753, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.252, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.813, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.157, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.539, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.702, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.499, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.499, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.359, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.359, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.611, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.611, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 298}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "59154598623a4a0bb204866ad7ed0034", "name": "Mexico 2000 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 300)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2000, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Mexico lower-house election 2000 (July), CONSTITUENCY level (300 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alianza_por_m_xico": "Alianza por M\u00e9xico", "votes_alianza_por_el_cambio": "Alianza por el Cambio", "votes_democracia_social_partido_pol_tico_n": "Democracia Social, Partido Pol\u00edtico Nacional", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_partido_aut_ntico_de_la_revoluci_n_m": "Partido Aut\u00e9ntico de la Revoluci\u00f3n Mexicana", "votes_partido_revolucionario_institucional": "Partido Revolucionario Institucional", "votes_partido_de_centro_democr_tico": "Partido de Centro Democr\u00e1tico"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 300, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 300, "cast_gt_registered": 300}, "n_stations_flagged": 300, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:11.176907", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.577, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.955, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.671, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.481, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.577, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.955, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.587, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.63, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.657, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.521, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.151, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.671, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.481, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.344, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.344, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.55, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional (PAN)", "winner_candidate": "Vincete Fox", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Partido Revolucionario Institucional  (PRI)", "margin": 6.55, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MEX", "year": 2000, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 300}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "742fb950927b43a6b50070ce016eb82d", "name": "Mexico 1997 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 300)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 1997, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Mexico lower-house election 1997 (July), CONSTITUENCY level (300 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_others": "Others", "votes_partido_acci_n_nacional": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional", "votes_partido_cardenista": "Partido Cardenista", "votes_partido_dem_crata_mexicano": "Partido Dem\u00f3crata Mexicano", "votes_partido_popular_socialista": "Partido Popular Socialista", "votes_partido_revolucionario_institucional": "Partido Revolucionario Institucional", "votes_partido_verde_ecologista_de_m_xico": "Partido Verde Ecologista de M\u00e9xico", "votes_partido_de_la_revoluci_n_dem_cratica": "Partido de la Revoluci\u00f3n Dem\u00f3cratica", "votes_partido_del_trabajo": "Partido del Trabajo"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 300, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 300, "cast_gt_registered": 300}, "n_stations_flagged": 300, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:09.721732", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.348, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.761, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.555, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.346, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.348, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.761, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.488, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.521, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.474, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.346, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.346, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.275, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.275, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.643, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.643, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.684, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.684, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 300}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a3cff478334b4f37b4eeff4bef42de65", "name": "Mexico 1994 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 298)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 1994, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Mexico lower-house election 1994 (August), CONSTITUENCY level (298 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_others": "Others", "votes_partido_acci_n_nacional": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional", "votes_partido_aut_ntico_de_la_revoluci_n_m": "Partido Aut\u00e9ntico de la Revoluci\u00f3n Mexicana", "votes_partido_popular_socialista": "Partido Popular Socialista", "votes_partido_revolucionario_institucional": "Partido Revolucionario Institucional", "votes_partido_verde_ecologista_de_m_xico": "Partido Verde Ecologista de M\u00e9xico", "votes_partido_de_la_revoluci_n_dem_cratica": "Partido de la Revoluci\u00f3n Dem\u00f3cratica", "votes_partido_del_frente_cardenista_de_rec": "Partido del Frente Cardenista de Reconstrucci\u00f3n Nacional", "votes_partido_del_trabajo": "Partido del Trabajo", "votes_uni_n_nacional_opositora": "Uni\u00f3n Nacional Opositora"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 298, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 298, "registered_not_positive": 298}, "n_stations_flagged": 298, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:08.266624", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.721, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.266, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.467, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.26, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.721, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.48, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.463, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.366, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.652, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.26, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.26, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.227, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.227, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.521, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.679, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.679, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.671, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Partido Revolucionario Institucional  (PRI)", "winner_candidate": "Ernesto Zedillo Ponce de L\u00e9on", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional (PAN)", "margin": 23.44, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MEX", "year": 1994, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 298}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0aa19dd83d704ed282970105b124a07c", "name": "Mexico 1991 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 299)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 1991, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Mexico lower-house election 1991 (August), CONSTITUENCY level (299 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_others": "Others", "votes_partido_acci_n_nacional": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional", "votes_partido_aut_ntico_de_la_revoluci_n_m": "Partido Aut\u00e9ntico de la Revoluci\u00f3n Mexicana", "votes_partido_dem_crata_mexicano": "Partido Dem\u00f3crata Mexicano", "votes_partido_ecologista_de_m_xico": "Partido Ecologista de M\u00e9xico", "votes_partido_popular_socialista": "Partido Popular Socialista", "votes_partido_revolucionario_institucional": "Partido Revolucionario Institucional", "votes_partido_revolucionario_de_los_trabaj": "Partido Revolucionario de los Trabajadores", "votes_partido_de_la_revoluci_n_dem_cratica": "Partido de la Revoluci\u00f3n Dem\u00f3cratica", "votes_partido_del_frente_cardenista_de_rec": "Partido del Frente Cardenista de Reconstrucci\u00f3n Nacional", "votes_partido_del_trabajo": "Partido del Trabajo"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 299, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 299, "cast_gt_registered": 299}, "n_stations_flagged": 299, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:06.792363", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.461, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.264, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.41, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.196, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.461, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.264, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.726, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 1991, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.111, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.278, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.655, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.414, "year": 1991, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.41, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 1991, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.196, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.196, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.198, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.613, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.613, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.38, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.38, "year": 1991, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 299}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0acc6f5e44ef434fb4cf2df44784bc55", "name": "Malawi 2004 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 194)", "metadata": {"country": "Malawi", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malawi lower-house election 2004 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (194 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_for_democracy": "Alliance for Democracy", "votes_congress_for_national_unity": "Congress for National Unity", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_malawi_congress_party": "Malawi Congress Party", "votes_malawi_democratic_party": "Malawi Democratic party", "votes_malawi_forum_for_unity_and_developme": "Malawi Forum for Unity and Development", "votes_movement_for_genuine_democratic_chan": "Movement for Genuine Democratic Change", "votes_national_democratic_alliance": "National Democratic Alliance", "votes_national_solidarity_movement": "National Solidarity Movement", "votes_national_unity_party": "National Unity Party", "votes_new_congress_for_democracy": "New Congress for Democracy", "votes_pamodzi_freedom_party": "Pamodzi Freedom Party", "votes_people_s_progressive_movement": "People's Progressive Movement", "votes_people_s_transformation_party": "People's Transformation Party", "votes_republican_party": "Republican Party", "votes_united_democratic_alliance": "United Democratic Alliance", "votes_united_democratic_front": "United Democratic Front"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 194, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 5, "cast_valid_mismatch": 17, "cast_gt_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 24, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:05.583859", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.633, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.439, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.459, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.377, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.439, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.532, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.19, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.129, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.282, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.211, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.377, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.377, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.29, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.29, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.709, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 8.0, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MWI", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 194}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "56ff43a3eeee41c6a235ac2d8f541d13", "name": "Malawi 1999 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 191)", "metadata": {"country": "Malawi", "year": 1999, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Malawi lower-house election 1999 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (191 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_for_democracy": "Alliance for Democracy", "votes_congress_for_national_unity": "Congress for National Unity", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_malawi_congress_party": "Malawi Congress Party", "votes_malawi_democratic_party": "Malawi Democratic Party", "votes_malawi_democratic_union": "Malawi Democratic Union", "votes_mass_movement_for_young_generation": "Mass Movement for Young Generation", "votes_national_patriotic_front": "National Patriotic Front", "votes_sapitwa_national_democratic_party": "Sapitwa National Democratic Party", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party", "votes_united_democratic_front": "United Democratic Front", "votes_united_party": "United Party", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 191, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 191, "registered_not_positive": 191}, "n_stations_flagged": 191, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:52:04.258543", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.211, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.704, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.512, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.401, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.211, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.704, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.23, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.274, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.319, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.129, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.282, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.211, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.401, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.401, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.311, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.311, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.6, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.663, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.663, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "UDF", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "MCP-AFFORD", "margin": 7.0, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MWI", "year": 1999, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 191}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2510b483c3984d4b8883bf49a5683ac9", "name": "India 1991 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 518)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 1991, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "India lower-house election 1991 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (518 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_india_anna_dravida_munnetra_kazh": "All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "votes_all_india_forward_bloc": "All India Forward Bloc", "votes_all_india_majlist_e_ittehadul_muslim": "All India Majlist-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen", "votes_asom_gana_parisad": "Asom Gana Parisad", "votes_bahujan_samaj_party": "Bahujan Samaj Party", "votes_bharatiya_janata_party": "Bharatiya Janata Party", "votes_bharatiya_republican_paksha": "Bharatiya Republican Paksha", "votes_communist_party_of_india": "Communist Party Of India", "votes_communist_party_of_india_marxist": "Communist Party Of India (Marxist)", "votes_door_darshi_party": "Door Darshi Party", "votes_dravida_munnetra_kazhagam": "Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "votes_haryana_vikas_party": "Haryana Vikas Party", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_indian_congress_socialist_sarat_chan": "Indian Congress (Socialist-Sarat Chandra Sinha)", "votes_indian_national_congress": "Indian National Congress", "votes_indian_peoples_front": "Indian Peoples Front", "votes_janata_dal": "Janata Dal", "votes_janata_dal_gujrat": "Janata Dal (Gujrat)", "votes_janata_party": "Janata Party", "votes_jharkhand_mukti_morcha": "Jharkhand Mukti Morcha", "votes_jharkhand_party": "Jharkhand Party", "votes_karnataka_rajya_ryota_sangha": "Karnataka Rajya Ryota Sangha", "votes_kerala_congress_m": "Kerala Congress (M)", "votes_muslim_league": "Muslim League", "votes_nagaland_peoples_council": "Nagaland Peoples Council", "votes_natun_asom_gana_parishad": "Natun Asom Gana Parishad", "votes_pattali_makkal_katchi": "Pattali Makkal Katchi", "votes_revolutionary_socialist_party": "Revolutionary Socialist Party", "votes_shivsena": "Shivsena", "votes_telugu_desam": "Telugu Desam", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 518, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 82}, "n_stations_flagged": 82, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:51:36.305329", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.767, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.852, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.713, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.561, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.767, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.015, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.108, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.027, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.561, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 1991, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.747, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.747, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.497, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.497, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 518}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ca5e201cb3134763a085c007628ebe01", "name": "US 1990 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 429)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1990, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1990 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (429 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american": "AMERICAN", "votes_american_independent": "AMERICAN INDEPENDENT", "votes_american_systems_independent_pa": "AMERICAN SYSTEMS INDEPENDENT (PA)", "votes_back_to_basics_nj90": "BACK TO BASICS (NJ90)", "votes_better_affordable_government_nj": "BETTER AFFORDABLE GOVERNMENT (NJ)", "votes_bronx_voters_party_ny": "BRONX VOTERS PARTY (NY)", "votes_conservative": "CONSERVATIVE", "votes_d_c_statehood": "D.C. STATEHOOD", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "DEMOCRAT-FARMER-LABOR", "votes_illinois_solidarity_party": "ILLINOIS SOLIDARITY PARTY", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_conservative": "INDEPENDENT CONSERVATIVE", "votes_independent_reform": "INDEPENDENT REFORM", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_jim_wham_party_jwp": "JIM WHAM PARTY (JWP)", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_libertarian": "LIBERTARIAN", "votes_liberty_union": "LIBERTY UNION", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_new_alliance_party": "NEW ALLIANCE PARTY", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "PEACE AND FREEDOM", "votes_populist": "POPULIST", "votes_right_to_life": "RIGHT TO LIFE", "votes_socialist_workers": "SOCIALIST WORKERS", "votes_tax_brake_ny": "TAX BRAKE (NY)", "votes_tisch": "TISCH", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_world_without_war_nj90": "WORLD WITHOUT WAR (NJ90)", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 429, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 402, "registered_not_positive": 429}, "n_stations_flagged": 429, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:50:11.114736", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.738, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.888, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.863, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.8, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.254, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 1990, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 1990, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.692, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.055, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 429}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3a174df396cc45a09d7dae2484900705", "name": "US 1988 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 428)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1988, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1988 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (428 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american": "AMERICAN", "votes_american_independent": "AMERICAN INDEPENDENT", "votes_citizens_against_rising_electric_rat": "CITIZENS AGAINST RISING ELECTRIC RATES", "votes_communist": "COMMUNIST", "votes_concerns_of_people": "CONCERNS OF PEOPLE", "votes_conservative": "CONSERVATIVE", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "DEMOCRAT-FARMER-LABOR", "votes_drug_fighter_party": "DRUG FIGHTER PARTY", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_independent_tax_watchdog": "INDEPENDENT TAX WATCHDOG", "votes_jobs_party": "JOBS PARTY", "votes_land_water_legacy": "LAND WATER LEGACY", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_libertarian": "LIBERTARIAN", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_new_alliance_party": "NEW ALLIANCE PARTY", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "PEACE AND FREEDOM", "votes_people_s_choice": "PEOPLE'S CHOICE", "votes_populist": "POPULIST", "votes_pro_life_conservative": "PRO-LIFE CONSERVATIVE", "votes_right_to_life": "RIGHT TO LIFE", "votes_socialist_workers": "SOCIALIST WORKERS", "votes_solidarity": "SOLIDARITY", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_vote_children_88": "VOTE CHILDREN '88", "votes_war_against_aids": "WAR AGAINST AIDS", "votes_workers_against_concessions_wac": "WORKERS AGAINST CONCESSIONS (WAC)", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 428, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 428, "cast_gt_registered": 402}, "n_stations_flagged": 428, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:50:08.990811", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.721, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.889, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.862, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.797, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.721, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 1988, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 1988, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.797, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 1988, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.68, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 1988, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.074, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.074, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Republican", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Democratic", "margin": 58.55, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1988, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 428}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5a8030470bca4395aa83576c07269a75", "name": "US 1986 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 424)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1986, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1986 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (424 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_amber_waves_grain": "AMBER WAVES GRAIN", "votes_american": "AMERICAN", "votes_concerns_of_people": "CONCERNS OF PEOPLE", "votes_conservative": "CONSERVATIVE", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "DEMOCRAT-FARMER-LABOR", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_neighbors": "INDEPENDENT NEIGHBORS", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_inflation_fighting_housewife": "INFLATION FIGHTING HOUSEWIFE", "votes_labor_and_farm": "LABOR AND FARM", "votes_labor_for_maine": "LABOR FOR MAINE", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_libertarian": "LIBERTARIAN", "votes_liberty_union": "LIBERTY UNION", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_new_alliance_party": "NEW ALLIANCE PARTY", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "PEACE AND FREEDOM", "votes_people_before_profits": "PEOPLE BEFORE PROFITS", "votes_populist": "POPULIST", "votes_pro_life_anti_abortion": "PRO LIFE, ANTI-ABORTION", "votes_pro_life": "PRO-LIFE", "votes_ratepayers_against_lilco": "RATEPAYERS AGAINST LILCO", "votes_right_to_life": "RIGHT TO LIFE", "votes_small_is_beautiful": "SMALL IS BEAUTIFUL", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_workers": "SOCIALIST WORKERS", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_worker_s_league": "WORKER'S LEAGUE", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 424, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 405, "registered_not_positive": 424}, "n_stations_flagged": 424, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:50:06.916955", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.728, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.891, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.857, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.792, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.728, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.273, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 1986, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 1986, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 1986, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 1986, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.078, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.078, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 424}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3d980de35564423bac4e97ba92c3b204", "name": "US 1984 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 430)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1984, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1984 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (430 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alabama_libertarian": "ALABAMA LIBERTARIAN", "votes_american": "AMERICAN", "votes_american_eagle_pennsylvania_1984": "AMERICAN EAGLE (PENNSYLVANIA, 1984)", "votes_american_independent": "AMERICAN INDEPENDENT", "votes_citizens": "CITIZENS", "votes_colorado_libertarian": "COLORADO LIBERTARIAN", "votes_communist": "COMMUNIST", "votes_concerns_of_people": "CONCERNS OF PEOPLE", "votes_conservative": "CONSERVATIVE", "votes_constitutionalist": "CONSTITUTIONALIST", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_libertarian": "LIBERTARIAN", "votes_libertyu_union_citizen_s_party_vermo": "LIBERTYU UNION-CITIZEN'S PARTY (VERMONT, 1984)", "votes_middle_class_candidate": "MIDDLE CLASS CANDIDATE", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_nuclear_freeze": "NUCLEAR FREEZE", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "PEACE AND FREEDOM", "votes_people_before_profits": "PEOPLE BEFORE PROFITS", "votes_peoples_and_republican": "PEOPLES AND REPUBLICAN", "votes_populist": "POPULIST", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_rainbow_coalition": "RAINBOW COALITION", "votes_ratepayers_against_lilco": "RATEPAYERS AGAINST LILCO", "votes_right_to_life": "RIGHT TO LIFE", "votes_small_is_beautiful": "SMALL IS BEAUTIFUL", "votes_socialist_workers": "SOCIALIST WORKERS", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 430, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 402, "registered_not_positive": 430}, "n_stations_flagged": 430, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:50:04.830779", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.737, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.889, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.86, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.794, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.255, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 1984, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 1984, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 1984, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.676, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 1984, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.078, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.078, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Republican", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Democratic", "margin": 95.16, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1984, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 430}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "20e7afd604b04071854cdf6df5668a4b", "name": "US 1982 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 422)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1982, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1982 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (422 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alabama_libertarian": "ALABAMA LIBERTARIAN", "votes_american": "AMERICAN", "votes_american_independent": "AMERICAN INDEPENDENT", "votes_anti_drug": "ANTI-DRUG", "votes_bipartisan_good_government": "BIPARTISAN GOOD GOVERNMENT", "votes_citizens": "CITIZENS", "votes_conservative": "CONSERVATIVE", "votes_consumer": "CONSUMER", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "DEMOCRAT-FARMER-LABOR", "votes_free_peoples": "FREE PEOPLES", "votes_independence": "INDEPENDENCE", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_neighbors": "INDEPENDENT NEIGHBORS", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_krill_for_congress": "KRILL FOR CONGRESS", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_libertarian": "LIBERTARIAN", "votes_liberty_union": "LIBERTY UNION", "votes_milton_street": "MILTON STREET", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_nuclear_freeze": "NUCLEAR FREEZE", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "PEACE AND FREEDOM", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_right_to_life": "RIGHT TO LIFE", "votes_small_is_beautiful": "SMALL IS BEAUTIFUL", "votes_socialist_workers": "SOCIALIST WORKERS", "votes_worker_s_league": "WORKER'S LEAGUE", "votes_young_socialist_alliance": "YOUNG SOCIALIST ALLIANCE", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 422, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 421, "registered_not_positive": 422}, "n_stations_flagged": 422, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:50:02.648892", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.723, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.89, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.856, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.791, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.723, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.905, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.279, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 1982, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.905, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 1982, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.791, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 1982, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 1982, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.078, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.078, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 422}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "370da24a99764cdd8760107a98708f34", "name": "US 1980 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 395)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1980, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1980 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (395 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_adams_republican": "ADAMS REPUBLICAN", "votes_alabama_libertarian": "ALABAMA LIBERTARIAN", "votes_american": "AMERICAN", "votes_american_independent": "AMERICAN INDEPENDENT", "votes_citizens": "CITIZENS", "votes_communist": "COMMUNIST", "votes_conservative": "CONSERVATIVE", "votes_constitution_party_of_illinois": "CONSTITUTION PARTY OF ILLINOIS", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "DEMOCRAT-FARMER-LABOR", "votes_free_libertarian": "FREE LIBERTARIAN", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_for_congress": "INDEPENDENT FOR CONGRESS", "votes_independent_neighbors": "INDEPENDENT NEIGHBORS", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_libertarian": "LIBERTARIAN", "votes_liberty_union": "LIBERTY UNION", "votes_middle_class_candidate": "MIDDLE CLASS CANDIDATE", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_new_union_party": "NEW UNION PARTY", "votes_no_slogan": "NO SLOGAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "PEACE AND FREEDOM", "votes_people_s_independent": "PEOPLE'S INDEPENDENT", "votes_pro_life": "PRO-LIFE", "votes_right_to_life": "RIGHT TO LIFE", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_socialist_workers": "SOCIALIST WORKERS", "votes_statesman": "STATESMAN", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 395, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 382, "registered_not_positive": 395}, "n_stations_flagged": 395, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:50:00.578798", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.722, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.883, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.844, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.778, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.722, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.26, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.667, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 1980, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Republican", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Democratic", "margin": 81.78, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1980, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 395}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6d97649267f0419782e4cff7e5bf125c", "name": "US 1978 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 392)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1978, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1978 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (392 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alabama_conservative": "ALABAMA CONSERVATIVE", "votes_alabama_libertarian": "ALABAMA LIBERTARIAN", "votes_aloha_democrat": "ALOHA DEMOCRAT", "votes_always_for_people": "ALWAYS FOR PEOPLE", "votes_american": "AMERICAN", "votes_american_independent": "AMERICAN INDEPENDENT", "votes_american_party_of_minnesota": "AMERICAN PARTY OF MINNESOTA", "votes_communist": "COMMUNIST", "votes_conservative": "CONSERVATIVE", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "DEMOCRAT-FARMER-LABOR", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_neighbors": "INDEPENDENT NEIGHBORS", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_la_raza_unida": "LA RAZA UNIDA", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_libertarian": "LIBERTARIAN", "votes_liberty_union": "LIBERTY UNION", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_none_of_these_candidates": "NONE OF THESE CANDIDATES", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "PEACE AND FREEDOM", "votes_people_s_independent": "PEOPLE'S INDEPENDENT", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_socialist_workers": "SOCIALIST WORKERS", "votes_united_states_labor_party": "UNITED STATES LABOR PARTY", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_workers": "WORKERS", "votes_workers_communist_party_of_america": "WORKERS (COMMUNIST) PARTY OF AMERICA", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 392, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 378, "registered_not_positive": 392}, "n_stations_flagged": 392, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:49:58.624118", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.717, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.834, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.768, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.796, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.274, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 1978, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 1978, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 1978, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 1978, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 1978, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.653, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 1978, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.054, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.054, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 392}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0b8e0a8f30b64fbc8b0e46d56f7b61ce", "name": "US 1976 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 429)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1976, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1976 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (429 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american": "AMERICAN", "votes_american_constitution": "AMERICAN CONSTITUTION", "votes_american_independent": "AMERICAN INDEPENDENT", "votes_american_party_of_iowa": "AMERICAN PARTY OF IOWA", "votes_conservative": "CONSERVATIVE", "votes_constitutional": "CONSTITUTIONAL", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "DEMOCRAT-FARMER-LABOR", "votes_george_wallace_party": "GEORGE WALLACE PARTY", "votes_human_rights": "HUMAN RIGHTS", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_american": "INDEPENDENT AMERICAN", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_independent_vermonters_party": "INDEPENDENT VERMONTERS PARTY", "votes_individual_americans_independence": "INDIVIDUAL AMERICANS INDEPENDENCE", "votes_la_raza_unida": "LA RAZA UNIDA", "votes_labor": "LABOR", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_libertarian": "LIBERTARIAN", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_none_of_these_candidates": "NONE OF THESE CANDIDATES", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "PEACE AND FREEDOM", "votes_people_s_independent": "PEOPLE'S INDEPENDENT", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_silent_majority": "SILENT MAJORITY", "votes_socialist_workers": "SOCIALIST WORKERS", "votes_united_states_labor_party": "UNITED STATES LABOR PARTY", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_workers_communist_party_of_america": "WORKERS (COMMUNIST) PARTY OF AMERICA", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 429, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 422, "registered_not_positive": 429}, "n_stations_flagged": 429, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:49:56.525564", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.729, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.889, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.791, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.726, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.729, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.261, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.791, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.054, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.054, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Republican", "margin": 10.59, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1976, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 429}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e652a37130344f7f8b391a2e42aa1e7e", "name": "US 1974 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 422)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1974, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1974 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (422 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alabama_conservative": "ALABAMA CONSERVATIVE", "votes_alabama_independent_democrat": "ALABAMA INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_american": "AMERICAN", "votes_american_independent": "AMERICAN INDEPENDENT", "votes_communist": "COMMUNIST", "votes_conservative": "CONSERVATIVE", "votes_constitutional": "CONSTITUTIONAL", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "DEMOCRAT-FARMER-LABOR", "votes_economic_justice": "ECONOMIC JUSTICE", "votes_george_wallace_party": "GEORGE WALLACE PARTY", "votes_good_neighbor": "GOOD NEIGHBOR", "votes_human_rights": "HUMAN RIGHTS", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_american": "INDEPENDENT AMERICAN", "votes_independent_citizens_action": "INDEPENDENT CITIZENS' ACTION", "votes_independent_voters": "INDEPENDENT VOTERS", "votes_labor": "LABOR", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_liberty_union": "LIBERTY UNION", "votes_life_liberty_and_justice": "LIFE, LIBERTY AND JUSTICE", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_national_democratic_party_of_alabama": "NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF ALABAMA", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "PEACE AND FREEDOM", "votes_politicians_are_crooks": "POLITICIANS ARE CROOKS", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_socialist_workers": "SOCIALIST WORKERS", "votes_united_states_labor_party": "UNITED STATES LABOR PARTY", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 422, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 405, "registered_not_positive": 422}, "n_stations_flagged": 422, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:49:54.382523", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.456, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.891, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.765, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.696, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.798, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1974, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.116, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 1974, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 1974, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 1974, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.696, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.073, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 422}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "539fc07cab434ab2959f6bf11d6db2be", "name": "US 1972 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 436)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1972, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1972 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (436 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_action_party": "ACTION PARTY", "votes_alabama_conservative": "ALABAMA CONSERVATIVE", "votes_american": "AMERICAN", "votes_american_independent": "AMERICAN INDEPENDENT", "votes_american_independent_conservative": "AMERICAN INDEPENDENT CONSERVATIVE", "votes_communist": "COMMUNIST", "votes_concerned_and_capable": "CONCERNED AND CAPABLE", "votes_conservative": "CONSERVATIVE", "votes_constitutional": "CONSTITUTIONAL", "votes_d_c_statehood": "D.C. STATEHOOD", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "DEMOCRAT-FARMER-LABOR", "votes_george_wallace_party": "GEORGE WALLACE PARTY", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_conservative": "INDEPENDENT CONSERVATIVE", "votes_la_raza_unida": "LA RAZA UNIDA", "votes_less_federal_taxes": "LESS FEDERAL TAXES", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_libertarian": "LIBERTARIAN", "votes_minnesota_taxpayers": "MINNESOTA TAXPAYERS", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_national_democratic_party_of_alabama": "NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF ALABAMA", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "PEACE AND FREEDOM", "votes_people_s": "PEOPLE'S", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_protest_progress_dignity": "PROTEST,PROGRESS,DIGNITY", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_socialist_workers": "SOCIALIST WORKERS", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 436, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 407, "registered_not_positive": 436}, "n_stations_flagged": 436, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:49:52.339352", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.278, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.736, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.659, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.278, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.794, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.116, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1972, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 1972, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.659, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 1972, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.567, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.567, "year": 1972, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.073, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Republican", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Democratic", "margin": 93.49, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1972, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 436}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8d022315558443d197c5a95c00648822", "name": "US 1970 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 435)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1970, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1970 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (435 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_a_public_party": "A PUBLIC PARTY", "votes_america_first_party": "AMERICA - FIRST PARTY", "votes_american": "AMERICAN", "votes_american_independent": "AMERICAN INDEPENDENT", "votes_american_party_of_missouri": "AMERICAN PARTY OF MISSOURI", "votes_buffalo": "BUFFALO", "votes_civil_service_independents": "CIVIL SERVICE INDEPENDENTS", "votes_common_people_s": "COMMON PEOPLE'S", "votes_conservative": "CONSERVATIVE", "votes_constitutional": "CONSTITUTIONAL", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "DEMOCRAT-FARMER-LABOR", "votes_dodd_independent": "DODD INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_for_peace": "INDEPENDENT FOR PEACE", "votes_iowa_new": "IOWA NEW", "votes_la_raza_unida": "LA RAZA UNIDA", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_liberty_union": "LIBERTY UNION", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_national_conservative_party": "NATIONAL CONSERVATIVE PARTY", "votes_national_democratic_party_of_alabama": "NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF ALABAMA", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "PEACE AND FREEDOM", "votes_peoples_constitutional": "PEOPLES CONSTITUTIONAL", "votes_right_to_life": "RIGHT TO LIFE", "votes_silent_majority": "SILENT MAJORITY", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_socialist_workers": "SOCIALIST WORKERS", "votes_urban_tax_reform": "URBAN TAX REFORM", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 435, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 406, "registered_not_positive": 435}, "n_stations_flagged": 435, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:49:50.157859", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.392, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.897, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.718, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.639, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.392, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1970, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.753, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.938, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 1970, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.116, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 1970, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1970, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.594, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 1970, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.718, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.718, "year": 1970, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 1970, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.552, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 1970, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.071, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 435}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6fadc28694904326a947b81721b5bc44", "name": "US 1968 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 434)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1968, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1968 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (434 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_abolish_port_authority": "ABOLISH PORT AUTHORITY", "votes_american_anti_communist_party": "AMERICAN ANTI-COMMUNIST PARTY", "votes_american_independent": "AMERICAN INDEPENDENT", "votes_citizens": "CITIZENS", "votes_common_sense": "COMMON SENSE", "votes_conservative": "CONSERVATIVE", "votes_constitution": "CONSTITUTION", "votes_deescalators": "DEESCALATORS", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "DEMOCRAT-FARMER-LABOR", "votes_denver_independent_party": "DENVER INDEPENDENT PARTY", "votes_essex_conservative_party": "ESSEX CONSERVATIVE PARTY", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_industrial_government": "INDUSTRIAL GOVERNMENT", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_national_democratic_party_of_alabama": "NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF ALABAMA", "votes_new_party": "NEW PARTY", "votes_new_politics": "NEW POLITICS", "votes_no_additional_taxes": "NO ADDITIONAL TAXES", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "PEACE AND FREEDOM", "votes_primary_party": "PRIMARY PARTY", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_socialist_workers": "SOCIALIST WORKERS", "votes_the_independent_s_choice": "THE INDEPENDENT'S CHOICE", "votes_trt_tax_payers_ticket": "TRT TAX PAYERS TICKET", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_voice_of_independence": "VOICE OF INDEPENDENCE", "votes_wisconsin_congress_of_conservatives": "WISCONSIN CONGRESS OF CONSERVATIVES", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 434, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 434, "cast_gt_registered": 411}, "n_stations_flagged": 434, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:49:47.768834", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.392, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.7, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.602, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.392, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1968, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.691, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 1968, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1968, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1968, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 1968, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.7, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 1968, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.602, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 1968, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.46, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.46, "year": 1968, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 1968, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.054, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.054, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 20.45, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1968, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 434}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "00d7dc4fccdd4b4b8e94d1550479800e", "name": "US 1966 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 433)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1966, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1966 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (433 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_peoples": "ALL PEOPLES", "votes_american_constitution": "AMERICAN CONSTITUTION", "votes_american_independent": "AMERICAN INDEPENDENT", "votes_citizens_peace": "CITIZENS PEACE", "votes_conservative": "CONSERVATIVE", "votes_constitution": "CONSTITUTION", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "DEMOCRAT-FARMER-LABOR", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_socialist": "INDEPENDENT SOCIALIST", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_new_hispano": "NEW HISPANO", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_peace_and_freedom": "PEACE AND FREEDOM", "votes_peace_equal_rights": "PEACE EQUAL RIGHTS", "votes_people_s_choice_the": "PEOPLE'S CHOICE, THE", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_socialist_workers": "SOCIALIST WORKERS", "votes_the_ohara_bill_party": "THE OHARA BILL PARTY", "votes_united_for_peace": "UNITED FOR PEACE", "votes_united_taxpayers": "UNITED TAXPAYERS", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_veterans": "VETERANS", "votes_voters_for_peace": "VOTERS FOR PEACE"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 433, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 433, "cast_gt_registered": 412}, "n_stations_flagged": 433, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:49:45.671594", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.717, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.89, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.693, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.594, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.687, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.969, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 1966, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1966, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1966, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.593, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 1966, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.693, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.693, "year": 1966, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.594, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.594, "year": 1966, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.454, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.454, "year": 1966, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.823, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 1966, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.054, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.054, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 433}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7bb9bc62baa9458aa0cfa7330a0e231d", "name": "US 1964 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 433)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1964, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1964 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (433 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american": "AMERICAN", "votes_conservative": "CONSERVATIVE", "votes_constitution": "CONSTITUTION", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "DEMOCRAT-FARMER-LABOR", "votes_eliminate_foreign_aid": "ELIMINATE FOREIGN AID", "votes_freedom_now": "FREEDOM NOW", "votes_freedom_socialist": "FREEDOM-SOCIALIST", "votes_good_government": "GOOD GOVERNMENT", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_national_states_rights": "NATIONAL STATES RIGHTS", "votes_new_day_independent": "NEW DAY INDEPENDENT", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_righteous_government_platform": "RIGHTEOUS GOVERNMENT PLATFORM", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_socialist_workers": "SOCIALIST WORKERS", "votes_united_taxpayers": "UNITED TAXPAYERS", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 433, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 433, "cast_gt_registered": 412}, "n_stations_flagged": 433, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:49:43.637396", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.729, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.887, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.678, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.572, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.729, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.986, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.747, "year": 1964, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1964, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1964, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.595, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 1964, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.678, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.678, "year": 1964, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.572, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.572, "year": 1964, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.411, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.411, "year": 1964, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 1964, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 80.66, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1964, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 433}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "51b234bb58dd4d789b3366590a1d6d00", "name": "US 1962 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 424)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1962, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1962 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (424 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative": "CONSERVATIVE", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "DEMOCRAT-FARMER-LABOR", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_conservative_republican": "INDEPENDENT CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_national_states_rights": "NATIONAL STATES RIGHTS", "votes_occion_popular": "OCCION POPULAR", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_socialist_workers": "SOCIALIST WORKERS", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_voters_for_peace": "VOTERS FOR PEACE"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 424, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 424, "cast_gt_registered": 392}, "n_stations_flagged": 424, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:49:37.697538", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.718, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.886, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.668, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.56, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.718, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.69, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.982, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 1962, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1962, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1962, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.594, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 1962, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.668, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 1962, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.56, "year": 1962, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.377, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.377, "year": 1962, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 1962, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 1962, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 424}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0e539f5112224f59b8201302ec20f61e", "name": "US 1960 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 432)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1960, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1960 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (432 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative": "CONSERVATIVE", "votes_constitutional": "CONSTITUTIONAL", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "DEMOCRAT-FARMER-LABOR", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_american": "INDEPENDENT AMERICAN", "votes_independent_anti_tax": "INDEPENDENT ANTI-TAX", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_social_democrat": "SOCIAL DEMOCRAT", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_tax_cut": "TAX CUT", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 432, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 432, "cast_gt_registered": 385}, "n_stations_flagged": 432, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:49:35.814738", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.392, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.743, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.649, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.544, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.392, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1960, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1960, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 1960, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.991, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.748, "year": 1960, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1960, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1960, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 1960, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.649, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 1960, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.544, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 1960, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.367, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.367, "year": 1960, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 1960, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1960, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 1960, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 1960, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 15.64, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1960, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 432}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "04f03788675743e0b37e36f6abd01f0b", "name": "US 1958 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 431)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1958, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1958 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (431 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_communist_labor": "COMMUNIST LABOR", "votes_conservative": "CONSERVATIVE", "votes_constitution": "CONSTITUTION", "votes_constitutional": "CONSTITUTIONAL", "votes_decency_and_vigilance": "DECENCY AND VIGILANCE", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "DEMOCRAT-FARMER-LABOR", "votes_freedom_through_victory": "FREEDOM THROUGH VICTORY", "votes_freee_democrat": "FREEE DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independents_for_economy": "INDEPENDENTS FOR ECONOMY", "votes_keep_people_working": "KEEP PEOPLE WORKING", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_light_a_candle": "LIGHT A CANDLE", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_progress_integrity_economy": "PROGRESS-INTEGRITY-ECONOMY", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_social_democrat": "SOCIAL DEMOCRAT", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_taxation_with_representation": "TAXATION WITH REPRESENTATION", "votes_taxpayers_only_friend": "TAXPAYERS ONLY FRIEND", "votes_the_peoples_friend": "THE PEOPLES FRIEND", "votes_united_taxpayers": "UNITED TAXPAYERS", "votes_unity_for_justice": "UNITY FOR JUSTICE", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 431, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 362, "registered_not_positive": 431}, "n_stations_flagged": 431, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:49:33.896938", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.726, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.9, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.625, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.527, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.726, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1958, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.9, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1958, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1958, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.791, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.448, "year": 1958, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1958, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1958, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.598, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 1958, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 1958, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.527, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 1958, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.343, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.343, "year": 1958, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 1958, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1958, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 1958, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 1958, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 431}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "16109dd0bc4749b7a6462b74a331de2f", "name": "US 1956 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 430)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1956, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1956 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (430 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_third_party": "AMERICAN THIRD PARTY", "votes_conservative": "CONSERVATIVE", "votes_constitutional": "CONSTITUTIONAL", "votes_decency_in_government": "DECENCY IN GOVERNMENT", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "DEMOCRAT-FARMER-LABOR", "votes_free_honest_elections": "FREE HONEST ELECTIONS", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_independent_teacher_veteran": "INDEPENDENT TEACHER VETERAN", "votes_independent_veterans": "INDEPENDENT VETERANS", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_progress_through_freedom": "PROGRESS THROUGH FREEDOM", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_socialist_workers": "SOCIALIST WORKERS", "votes_tax_payers": "TAX PAYERS", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_virginia_social_democrat": "VIRGINIA SOCIAL DEMOCRAT"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 430, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 430, "cast_gt_registered": 374}, "n_stations_flagged": 430, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:49:29.763075", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.722, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.889, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.616, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.517, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.722, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 1956, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1956, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1956, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.792, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.448, "year": 1956, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1956, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1956, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.593, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 1956, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.616, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 1956, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.517, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 1956, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.337, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.337, "year": 1956, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.773, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.773, "year": 1956, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1956, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 1956, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 1956, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 72.31, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1956, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 430}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1652743a471b4c569082cfe889b0ca06", "name": "US 1954 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 429)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1954, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1954 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (429 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_labor": "AMERICAN LABOR", "votes_constitutional": "CONSTITUTIONAL", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "DEMOCRAT-FARMER-LABOR", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_progressive": "INDEPENDENT PROGRESSIVE", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_militant_workers": "MILITANT WORKERS", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_progressive": "PROGRESSIVE", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_socialist_workers": "SOCIALIST WORKERS", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_virginia_social_democrat": "VIRGINIA SOCIAL DEMOCRAT"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 429, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 429, "cast_gt_registered": 369}, "n_stations_flagged": 429, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:49:27.667150", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.723, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.608, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.516, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.723, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1954, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1954, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.74, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1954, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.794, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 1954, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1954, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1954, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.594, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 1954, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.608, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.608, "year": 1954, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.516, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.516, "year": 1954, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.326, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.326, "year": 1954, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 1954, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1954, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 1954, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.785, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 1954, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 429}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1b4d356e4fae40ba868e05b9d703ebc0", "name": "US 1952 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 429)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1952, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1952 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (429 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_labor": "AMERICAN LABOR", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "DEMOCRAT-FARMER-LABOR", "votes_increase_jobless_pay": "INCREASE JOBLESS PAY", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_citizens_committee": "INDEPENDENT CITIZENS COMMITTEE", "votes_independent_labor": "INDEPENDENT LABOR", "votes_independent_progressive": "INDEPENDENT PROGRESSIVE", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_people_s_choice_the": "PEOPLE'S CHOICE, THE", "votes_people_s_rights": "PEOPLE'S RIGHTS", "votes_progressive": "PROGRESSIVE", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_socialist_workers": "SOCIALIST WORKERS", "votes_square_deal": "SQUARE DEAL", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 429, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 381, "registered_not_positive": 429}, "n_stations_flagged": 429, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:49:25.741974", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.897, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.611, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.522, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1952, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1952, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1952, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 1952, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1952, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1952, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.594, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 1952, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.611, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.611, "year": 1952, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.522, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.522, "year": 1952, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.335, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 1952, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 1952, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1952, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 1952, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 1952, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 66.48, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1952, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 429}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ebc9b873d35e4c658e7754300e9a9426", "name": "US 1950 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 429)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1950, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1950 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (429 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_labor": "AMERICAN LABOR", "votes_christian_nationalist": "CHRISTIAN NATIONALIST", "votes_constitutional": "CONSTITUTIONAL", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "DEMOCRAT-FARMER-LABOR", "votes_fusion": "FUSION", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_peoples_choice": "INDEPENDENT PEOPLES CHOICE", "votes_independent_progressive": "INDEPENDENT PROGRESSIVE", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_people_s": "PEOPLE'S", "votes_progressive": "PROGRESSIVE", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_social_democrat": "SOCIAL DEMOCRAT", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_workers": "SOCIALIST WORKERS", "votes_state_rights_democrat": "STATE RIGHTS DEMOCRAT", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 429, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 368, "registered_not_positive": 429}, "n_stations_flagged": 429, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:49:23.778017", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.729, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.891, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.585, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.502, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.729, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1950, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1950, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.745, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1950, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.789, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.447, "year": 1950, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1950, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1950, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 1950, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.585, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.585, "year": 1950, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.502, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.502, "year": 1950, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.32, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.32, "year": 1950, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 1950, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1950, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 1950, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 1950, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 429}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fc518ee62984400e9cc8e92a9cc9ec0f", "name": "UK 1987 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 650)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1987, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1987 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (650 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_party": "Alliance Party", "votes_british_national_party": "British National Party", "votes_communist_party_of_great_britain": "Communist Party of Great Britain", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_democratic_unionist_party": "Democratic Unionist Party", "votes_ecology_party": "Ecology Party", "votes_fellowship_party": "Fellowship Party", "votes_humanist_party": "Humanist Party", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_monster_raving_loony_party": "Monster Raving Loony Party", "votes_orkney_and_shetland_movement": "Orkney and Shetland Movement", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_protestant_unionists": "Protestant Unionists", "votes_red_front": "Red Front", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_sinn_f_in": "Sinn F\u00e9in", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party", "votes_social_democratic_and_labour_party": "Social Democratic and Labour Party", "votes_socialist_party_of_great_britain": "Socialist Party of Great Britain", "votes_ulster_unionist_party": "Ulster Unionist Party", "votes_workers_revolutionary_party": "Workers Revolutionary Party", "votes_workers_party": "Workers' Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 650, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:49:21.240147", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.605, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.803, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.724, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.605, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.306, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 1987, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.245, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.65, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 1987, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 650}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2fd62ce7cbe64427923f9a51d7e66158", "name": "UK 1983 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 650)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1983, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1983 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (650 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_party": "Alliance Party", "votes_british_national_party": "British National Party", "votes_communist_party_of_great_britain": "Communist Party of Great Britain", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_democratic_unionist_party": "Democratic Unionist Party", "votes_ecology_party": "Ecology Party", "votes_free_trade_anti_common_market_party": "Free Trade Anti-Common Market Party", "votes_independent_conservatives": "Independent Conservatives", "votes_independent_democratic_unionist_part": "Independent Democratic Unionist Party", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independent_liberals": "Independent Liberals", "votes_independent_socialists": "Independent Socialists", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_mebyon_kernow": "Mebyon Kernow", "votes_monster_raving_loony_party": "Monster Raving Loony Party", "votes_national_front": "National Front", "votes_nationalist_party": "Nationalist Party", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_revolutionary_communist_party": "Revolutionary Communist Party", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_sinn_f_in": "Sinn F\u00e9in", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party", "votes_social_democratic_and_labour_party": "Social Democratic and Labour Party", "votes_ulster_popular_unionist_party": "Ulster Popular Unionist Party", "votes_ulster_unionist_party": "Ulster Unionist Party", "votes_wessex_regionalists": "Wessex Regionalists", "votes_workers_revolutionary_party": "Workers Revolutionary Party", "votes_workers_party": "Workers' Party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 650, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:49:18.368044", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.598, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.948, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.803, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.724, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.598, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.313, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 1983, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.244, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.651, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 1983, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 650}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "007acd9f21f242db975a1eb366cd30a9", "name": "UK 1979 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 635)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1979, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1979 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (635 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_party": "Alliance Party", "votes_communist_party_of_great_britain": "Communist Party of Great Britain", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_democratic_labour": "Democratic Labour", "votes_democratic_unionist_party": "Democratic Unionist Party", "votes_ecology_party": "Ecology Party", "votes_independent_conservatives": "Independent Conservatives", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independent_liberals": "Independent Liberals", "votes_independent_republicans": "Independent Republicans", "votes_independent_socialists": "Independent Socialists", "votes_independent_unionists": "Independent Unionists", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_irish_independence_party": "Irish Independence Party", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_mebyon_kernow": "Mebyon Kernow", "votes_national_front": "National Front", "votes_northern_ireland_labour_party": "Northern Ireland Labour Party", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_republican_clubs": "Republican Clubs", "votes_scottish_labour_party": "Scottish Labour Party", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_social_democratic_and_labour_party": "Social Democratic and Labour Party", "votes_socialist_unity": "Socialist Unity", "votes_ulster_unionist_party": "Ulster Unionist Party", "votes_unionist_party_of_northern_ireland": "Unionist Party of Northern Ireland", "votes_united_ulster_unionist_council": "United Ulster Unionist Council", "votes_wessex_regionalists": "Wessex Regionalists", "votes_workers_revolutionary_party": "Workers Revolutionary Party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 635, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:49:15.551940", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.776, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.944, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.821, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.732, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.776, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.944, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.303, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 1979, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.617, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 1979, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.059, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 1979, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1979, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 1979, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 1979, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.027, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.027, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 635}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cbd531e0f6294f128874e42f8bae246f", "name": "UK 1974 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 635)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1974, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1974 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (635 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance_party": "Alliance Party", "votes_campaign_for_more_prosperous_britain": "Campaign for More Prosperous Britain", "votes_communist_party_of_england_marxist_l": "Communist Party of England (Marxist-Leninist)", "votes_communist_party_of_great_britain": "Communist Party of Great Britain", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_democratic_labour": "Democratic Labour", "votes_democratic_unionist_party": "Democratic Unionist Party", "votes_english_national_party": "English National Party", "votes_independent_conservatives": "Independent Conservatives", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independent_liberals": "Independent Liberals", "votes_independent_unionists": "Independent Unionists", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_irish_civil_rights_association": "Irish Civil Rights Association", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_national_front": "National Front", "votes_northern_ireland_labour_party": "Northern Ireland Labour Party", "votes_people": "People", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_republican_clubs": "Republican Clubs", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_social_democratic_and_labour_party": "Social Democratic and Labour Party", "votes_ulster_unionist_party": "Ulster Unionist Party", "votes_unionist_party_of_northern_ireland": "Unionist Party of Northern Ireland", "votes_united_democratic_party": "United Democratic Party", "votes_united_english_nationalist_party": "United English Nationalist Party", "votes_unity": "Unity", "votes_vanguard_unionist_progressive_party": "Vanguard Unionist Progressive Party", "votes_workers_revolutionary_party": "Workers Revolutionary Party", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 635, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:49:12.894503", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.781, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.947, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.824, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.741, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.947, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.309, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 1974, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.617, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.244, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 1974, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.741, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 1974, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.69, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.69, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 1974, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.027, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.027, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 635}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3f2c8117a9d84d2abd8881e7ddb2ce10", "name": "UK 1970 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 629)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1970, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1970 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (629 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_british_commonwealth_party": "British Commonwealth Party", "votes_british_movement": "British Movement", "votes_communist_party_of_great_britain": "Communist Party of Great Britain", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_democratic_party": "Democratic Party", "votes_independent_conservatives": "Independent Conservatives", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independent_labour_party": "Independent Labour Party", "votes_independent_liberals": "Independent Liberals", "votes_independent_progressive_party": "Independent Progressive Party", "votes_independent_unionists": "Independent Unionists", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_mebyon_kernow": "Mebyon Kernow", "votes_national_democratic_party": "National Democratic Party", "votes_national_front": "National Front", "votes_new_east_islington_liberal_associati": "New East Islington Liberal Association", "votes_northern_ireland_labour_party": "Northern Ireland Labour Party", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_protestant_unionists": "Protestant Unionists", "votes_republican_labour": "Republican Labour", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_socialist_party_of_great_britain": "Socialist Party of Great Britain", "votes_unionists": "Unionists", "votes_unity": "Unity", "votes_vectis_nationalist_party": "Vectis Nationalist Party", "votes_world_government_party": "World Government Party", "votes_young_ideas_party": "Young Ideas Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 629, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:49:07.223618", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.778, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.946, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.823, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.729, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.302, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 1970, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.617, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 1970, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.245, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.823, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 1970, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.729, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 1970, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.691, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 1970, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 1970, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.019, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.019, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 629}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "49ddbef316bb420d904aeb95e553107c", "name": "UK 1966 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 629)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1966, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1966 (March), CONSTITUENCY level (629 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_british_national_party": "British National Party", "votes_communist_party_of_great_britain": "Communist Party of Great Britain", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_fellowship_party": "Fellowship Party", "votes_independent_conservatives": "Independent Conservatives", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independent_labour_party": "Independent Labour Party", "votes_independent_liberals": "Independent Liberals", "votes_independent_republicans": "Independent Republicans", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_national_democratic_party": "National Democratic Party", "votes_national_teenage_party": "National Teenage Party", "votes_nationalists": "Nationalists", "votes_new_east_islington_liberal_associati": "New East Islington Liberal Association", "votes_northern_ireland_labour_party": "Northern Ireland Labour Party", "votes_patriotic_party": "Patriotic Party", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_radical_alliance": "Radical Alliance", "votes_republican_labour": "Republican Labour", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_socialist_party_of_great_britain": "Socialist Party of Great Britain", "votes_union_movement": "Union Movement", "votes_unionists": "Unionists", "votes_unity": "Unity"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 629, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:49:04.571189", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.776, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.946, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.824, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.728, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.776, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.298, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 1966, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.617, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 1966, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.243, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 1966, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1966, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.684, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.684, "year": 1966, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.017, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.017, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 1966, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 629}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "db7134ed219442dfa9d2dc5fe644ede4", "name": "UK 1964 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 629)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1964, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1964 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (629 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_agriculturalists": "Agriculturalists", "votes_british_national_party": "British National Party", "votes_british_and_commonwealth_party": "British and Commonwealth Party", "votes_christian_socialists": "Christian Socialists", "votes_communist_party_of_great_britain": "Communist Party of Great Britain", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_fellowship_party": "Fellowship Party", "votes_independent_conservatives": "Independent Conservatives", "votes_independent_liberals": "Independent Liberals", "votes_independent_nuclear_disarmament_elec": "Independent Nuclear Disarmament Election Committee", "votes_independent_republicans": "Independent Republicans", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_league_of_empire_loyalists": "League of Empire Loyalists", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_national_democratic_party": "National Democratic Party", "votes_new_east_islington_liberal_associati": "New East Islington Liberal Association", "votes_northern_ireland_labour_party": "Northern Ireland Labour Party", "votes_patriotic_party": "Patriotic Party", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_republican_labour": "Republican Labour", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_socialist_party_of_great_britain": "Socialist Party of Great Britain", "votes_taxpayers_coalition_party": "Taxpayers' Coalition Party", "votes_unionists": "Unionists", "votes_world_government_party": "World Government Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 629, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:49:01.793668", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.78, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.946, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.81, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.714, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.304, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 1964, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.617, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 1964, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.239, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 1964, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 1964, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.66, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 1964, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.872, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.017, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.017, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 1964, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 629}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "15218f49318c4fb68c233497ffb2e4b4", "name": "UK 1959 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 629)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1959, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1959 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (629 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alert_party": "Alert Party", "votes_communist_party_of_great_britain": "Communist Party of Great Britain", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_fellowship_party": "Fellowship Party", "votes_fife_socialist_league": "Fife Socialist League", "votes_independent_conservatives": "Independent Conservatives", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independent_labour_party": "Independent Labour Party", "votes_independent_liberals": "Independent Liberals", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_lancastrian_party": "Lancastrian Party", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_national_labour": "National Labour", "votes_northern_ireland_labour_party": "Northern Ireland Labour Party", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_sinn_f_in": "Sinn F\u00e9in", "votes_socialist_party_of_great_britain": "Socialist Party of Great Britain", "votes_union_movement": "Union Movement", "votes_unionists": "Unionists"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 629, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:48:59.022038", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.631, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.948, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.803, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.694, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.631, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.048, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1959, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.617, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 1959, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.225, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.056, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 1959, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 1959, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.651, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 1959, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.017, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.017, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 629}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "93065eda6b0a4464b8ae6ee0c8263a7e", "name": "UK 1955 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 629)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1955, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1955 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (629 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_communist_party_of_great_britain": "Communist Party of Great Britain", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independent_labour_party": "Independent Labour Party", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_irish_labour": "Irish Labour", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_northern_ireland_labour_party": "Northern Ireland Labour Party", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_sinn_f_in": "Sinn F\u00e9in", "votes_unionists": "Unionists"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 629, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:48:56.318884", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.628, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.947, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.804, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.628, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 1955, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.947, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1955, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 1955, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.046, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 1955, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.617, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 1955, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1955, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.228, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.057, "year": 1955, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 1955, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 1955, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.652, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 1955, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 1955, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 1955, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.017, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.017, "year": 1955, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 1955, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 629}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d26da339bd39470381630c2f99d0bf9b", "name": "UK 1951 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 624)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1951, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1951 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (624 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_british_empire_party": "British Empire Party", "votes_communist_party_of_great_britain": "Communist Party of Great Britain", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_independent_conservatives": "Independent Conservatives", "votes_independent_labour_party": "Independent Labour Party", "votes_independent_nationalists": "Independent Nationalists", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_irish_labour": "Irish Labour", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_nationalist_irish_anti_partition_of_": "Nationalist Irish Anti-Partition of Ireland League of Great", "votes_nationalists": "Nationalists", "votes_northern_ireland_labour_party": "Northern Ireland Labour Party", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_unionists": "Unionists"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 624, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1, "registered_not_positive": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:48:53.794918", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.637, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.951, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.81, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.699, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.637, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 1951, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1951, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 1951, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.293, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 1951, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.617, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 1951, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1951, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.223, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.056, "year": 1951, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 1951, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 1951, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.657, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.657, "year": 1951, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 1951, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 1951, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.017, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.017, "year": 1951, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 1951, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 624}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "43d7778d85a34c88a66cf4ffa088de03", "name": "UK 1950 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 624)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1950, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1950 (February), CONSTITUENCY level (624 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_communist_party_of_great_britain": "Communist Party of Great Britain", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_independent_conservatives": "Independent Conservatives", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independent_labour_party": "Independent Labour Party", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_irish_labour": "Irish Labour", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_mudiad_gweriniaethol_cymru": "Mudiad Gweriniaethol Cymru", "votes_nationalist_irish_anti_partition_of_": "Nationalist Irish Anti-Partition of Ireland League of Great", "votes_nationalists": "Nationalists", "votes_nationals": "Nationals", "votes_northern_ireland_labour_party": "Northern Ireland Labour Party", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_sinn_f_in": "Sinn F\u00e9in", "votes_social_credit_party_of_great_britain": "Social Credit Party of Great Britain", "votes_socialist_party_of_great_britain": "Socialist Party of Great Britain", "votes_unionists": "Unionists"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 624, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 2, "cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:48:51.108364", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.629, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.811, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.699, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.629, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 1950, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1950, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 1950, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.297, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 1950, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.617, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 1950, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 1950, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.216, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.054, "year": 1950, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 1950, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 1950, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.666, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 1950, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 1950, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 1950, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.017, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.017, "year": 1950, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 1950, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 624}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6b91be32d71e4401b904bceec717028c", "name": "Thailand 1988 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 142)", "metadata": {"country": "Thailand", "year": 1988, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Thailand lower-house election 1988 (July), CONSTITUENCY level (142 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_chart_thai": "CHART THAI", "votes_kaona": "KAONA", "votes_kaset_utsahakamthai": "KASET UTSAHAKAMTHAI", "votes_kit_prachakhom": "KIT PRACHAKHOM", "votes_kit_sangkhom": "KIT SANGKHOM", "votes_muan_chon": "MUAN CHON", "votes_palang_sangkhom_prachathippatai": "PALANG SANGKHOM PRACHATHIPPATAI", "votes_palangtham": "PALANGTHAM", "votes_prachachon": "PRACHACHON", "votes_prachacornthai": "PRACHACORNTHAI", "votes_prachathipat": "PRACHATHIPAT", "votes_puangchon_chao_thai": "PUANGCHON CHAO THAI", "votes_rassadorn": "RASSADORN", "votes_ruam_thai": "RUAM THAI", "votes_saha_prachathippatai": "SAHA PRACHATHIPPATAI", "votes_serichon": "SERICHON", "votes_seriniyom": "SERINIYOM"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 142, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 142, "registered_not_positive": 142}, "n_stations_flagged": 142, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:48:49.985507", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.794, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.768, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.345, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.252, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.794, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 1988, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 1988, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.495, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 1988, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.162, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.041, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.195, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 1988, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.652, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.163, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.345, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.345, "year": 1988, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.252, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.252, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.163, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.163, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.587, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 1988, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.764, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 1988, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.587, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 1988, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 142}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f0b51efd69b948ed8e404850b74aac6b", "name": "Thailand 1983 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 134)", "metadata": {"country": "Thailand", "year": 1983, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Thailand lower-house election 1983 (April), CONSTITUENCY level (134 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_chart_prachathippatai": "CHART PRACHATHIPPATAI", "votes_chart_thai": "CHART THAI", "votes_issara": "ISSARA", "votes_independent": "Independent", "votes_kaona": "KAONA", "votes_kit_sangkhom": "KIT SANGKHOM", "votes_palang_mai": "PALANG MAI", "votes_prachacornthai": "PRACHACORNTHAI", "votes_prachaseri": "PRACHASERI", "votes_prachathai": "PRACHATHAI", "votes_prachathipat": "PRACHATHIPAT", "votes_puangchon_chao_thai": "PUANGCHON CHAO THAI", "votes_raengngan_prachathippatai": "RAENGNGAN PRACHATHIPPATAI", "votes_saha_chart": "SAHA CHART", "votes_sangkhom_prachathippatai": "SANGKHOM PRACHATHIPPATAI", "votes_siam_prachathippatai": "SIAM PRACHATHIPPATAI"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 134, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 134, "registered_not_positive": 134}, "n_stations_flagged": 134, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:48:48.859824", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.941, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.771, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.316, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.215, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 1983, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.771, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.482, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 1983, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.162, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.041, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.006, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.501, "year": 1983, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.662, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.166, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 1983, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.215, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.215, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.577, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 1983, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.764, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.566, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.566, "year": 1983, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 134}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a212c2abb16944a6a2ffc3f1d25defdf", "name": "Sri Lanka 1977 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 160)", "metadata": {"country": "Sri Lanka", "year": 1977, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Sri Lanka lower-house election 1977 (July), CONSTITUENCY level (160 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_aeroplane": "Aeroplane", "votes_bell": "Bell", "votes_bird": "Bird", "votes_book": "Book", "votes_butterfly": "Butterfly", "votes_cart_wheel": "Cart Wheel", "votes_chair": "Chair", "votes_clock": "Clock", "votes_cockerel": "Cockerel", "votes_cup": "Cup", "votes_elephant": "Elephant", "votes_eye": "Eye", "votes_flower": "Flower", "votes_hand": "Hand", "votes_house": "House", "votes_key": "Key", "votes_ladder": "Ladder", "votes_lamp": "Lamp", "votes_omni_bus": "Omni bus", "votes_orange": "Orange", "votes_pair_of_scales": "Pair of Scales", "votes_rabbit": "Rabbit", "votes_radio": "Radio", "votes_ship": "Ship", "votes_spoon": "Spoon", "votes_star": "Star", "votes_sun": "Sun", "votes_table": "Table", "votes_tree": "Tree", "votes_umbrella": "Umbrella", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 160, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 6, "cast_valid_mismatch": 21}, "n_stations_flagged": 24, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:48:47.604159", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.267, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.833, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.565, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.417, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.267, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 1977, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.833, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1977, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 1977, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.467, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.617, "year": 1977, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 1977, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.649, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.662, "year": 1977, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.472, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.118, "year": 1977, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.565, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.565, "year": 1977, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.417, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.417, "year": 1977, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.375, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.375, "year": 1977, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 1977, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 1977, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.152, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.152, "year": 1977, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.744, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 1977, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 160}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "212645e89680470c93a908d5516e439f", "name": "Sri Lanka 1970 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 143)", "metadata": {"country": "Sri Lanka", "year": 1970, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Sri Lanka lower-house election 1970 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (143 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_bell": "Bell", "votes_bicycle": "Bicycle", "votes_butterfly": "Butterfly", "votes_cart_wheel": "Cart Wheel", "votes_chair": "Chair", "votes_cockerel": "Cockerel", "votes_elephant": "Elephant", "votes_eye": "Eye", "votes_flower": "Flower", "votes_hand": "Hand", "votes_house": "House", "votes_key": "Key", "votes_ladder": "Ladder", "votes_lamp": "Lamp", "votes_pair_of_scales": "Pair of Scales", "votes_radio": "Radio", "votes_ship": "Ship", "votes_star": "Star", "votes_sweing_machine": "Sweing Machine", "votes_tree": "Tree", "votes_umbrella": "Umbrella"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 143, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 12, "cast_gt_registered": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 15, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:48:46.154369", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.567, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.838, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.64, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.479, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.567, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.807, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 1970, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 1970, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.649, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.662, "year": 1970, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.471, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.118, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.64, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.64, "year": 1970, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 1970, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.431, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 1970, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 1970, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 1970, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.138, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.138, "year": 1970, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 1970, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 143}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ba2e1e36cfc64d7c81ab679161240bf7", "name": "Sri Lanka 1965 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 144)", "metadata": {"country": "Sri Lanka", "year": 1965, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Sri Lanka lower-house election 1965 (March), CONSTITUENCY level (144 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_aeroplane": "Aeroplane", "votes_bell": "Bell", "votes_bicycle": "Bicycle", "votes_bird": "Bird", "votes_butterfly": "Butterfly", "votes_cart_wheel": "Cart Wheel", "votes_chair": "Chair", "votes_clock": "Clock", "votes_cockerel": "Cockerel", "votes_cup": "Cup", "votes_elephant": "Elephant", "votes_eye": "Eye", "votes_flower": "Flower", "votes_hand": "Hand", "votes_house": "House", "votes_key": "Key", "votes_ladder": "Ladder", "votes_lamp": "Lamp", "votes_omni_bus": "Omni bus", "votes_pair_of_scales": "Pair of Scales", "votes_pair_of_spectacles": "Pair of Spectacles", "votes_ship": "Ship", "votes_star": "Star", "votes_sun": "Sun", "votes_tree": "Tree", "votes_umbrella": "Umbrella"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 144, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 23, "cast_gt_registered": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 27, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:48:45.073613", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.798, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.831, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.661, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.502, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.798, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.425, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.285, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.649, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.662, "year": 1965, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.47, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.117, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 1965, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.502, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.502, "year": 1965, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.445, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 1965, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 1965, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.126, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.126, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 1965, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 144}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b5b98831a8964e9da231ca29ae5b29f3", "name": "Sri Lanka 1960 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 145)", "metadata": {"country": "Sri Lanka", "year": 1960, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Sri Lanka lower-house election 1960 (March), CONSTITUENCY level (145 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_aeroplane": "Aeroplane", "votes_bell": "Bell", "votes_bicycle": "Bicycle", "votes_book": "Book", "votes_butterfly": "Butterfly", "votes_cart_wheel": "Cart Wheel", "votes_clock": "Clock", "votes_cockerel": "Cockerel", "votes_cup": "Cup", "votes_elephant": "Elephant", "votes_eye": "Eye", "votes_hand": "Hand", "votes_house": "House", "votes_key": "Key", "votes_ladder": "Ladder", "votes_lamp": "Lamp", "votes_mortar": "Mortar", "votes_pair_of_scales": "Pair of Scales", "votes_pair_of_spectacles": "Pair of Spectacles", "votes_pot": "Pot", "votes_rabbit": "Rabbit", "votes_saw": "Saw", "votes_ship": "Ship", "votes_spoon": "Spoon", "votes_star": "Star", "votes_sun": "Sun", "votes_sweing_machine": "Sweing machine", "votes_tree": "Tree", "votes_tumbler": "Tumbler", "votes_umbrella": "Umbrella", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 145, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 5, "cast_valid_mismatch": 50}, "n_stations_flagged": 53, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:48:42.980914", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.78, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.839, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.66, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.501, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1960, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.839, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1960, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.43, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 1960, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.29, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 1960, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 1960, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.649, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.662, "year": 1960, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.471, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.118, "year": 1960, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.66, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 1960, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.501, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.501, "year": 1960, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.445, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 1960, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 1960, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 1960, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.126, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.126, "year": 1960, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 1960, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 145}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8c3920690bc546c99ee93463c98606df", "name": "US 1948 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 429)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1948, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1948 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (429 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_labor": "AMERICAN LABOR", "votes_communist": "COMMUNIST", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "DEMOCRAT-FARMER-LABOR", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_progressive": "INDEPENDENT PROGRESSIVE", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_new_progressive": "NEW PROGRESSIVE", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_people_s": "PEOPLE'S", "votes_peoples_progressive": "PEOPLES PROGRESSIVE", "votes_progressive": "PROGRESSIVE", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_socialist_workers": "SOCIALIST WORKERS", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_workers": "WORKERS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 429, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 429, "cast_gt_registered": 383}, "n_stations_flagged": 429, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:46:21.425890", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.388, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.743, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.603, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.51, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.388, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 1948, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1948, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 1948, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 1948, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1948, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1948, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.404, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.601, "year": 1948, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 1948, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.51, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.51, "year": 1948, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.323, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.323, "year": 1948, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 1948, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1948, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.062, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.062, "year": 1948, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.786, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 1948, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 21.47, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 1948, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 429}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "67b9263e4ae64cfca718eb5ee95ecc69", "name": "US 1946 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 429)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1946, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1946 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (429 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_250_00_state_bonds": "$250.00 STATE BONDS", "votes_american_labor": "AMERICAN LABOR", "votes_cluney_taxpayers_good_government": "CLUNEY TAXPAYERS GOOD GOVERNMENT", "votes_communist": "COMMUNIST", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "DEMOCRAT-FARMER-LABOR", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_progressive": "INDEPENDENT PROGRESSIVE", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_justice_decency_independence": "JUSTICE, DECENCY, INDEPENDENCE", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_no_foreign_loans": "NO FOREIGN LOANS", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_revolutionary_workers": "REVOLUTIONARY WORKERS", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_socialist_workers": "SOCIALIST WORKERS", "votes_sullivan_independent_voters": "SULLIVAN INDEPENDENT VOTERS", "votes_united_citizen": "UNITED CITIZEN", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_veterans_farmer": "VETERANS FARMER", "votes_veterans_victory": "VETERANS VICTORY", "votes_workers": "WORKERS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 429, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 429, "cast_gt_registered": 384}, "n_stations_flagged": 429, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:46:19.478169", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.729, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.89, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.602, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.506, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.729, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1946, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1946, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 1946, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 1946, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.569, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.642, "year": 1946, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1946, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.387, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 1946, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.602, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 1946, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 1946, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.322, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.322, "year": 1946, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.758, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.758, "year": 1946, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1946, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.062, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.062, "year": 1946, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 1946, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 429}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6744c658174945ab8179879520291d24", "name": "US 1944 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 429)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1944, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1944 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (429 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_labor": "AMERICAN LABOR", "votes_constitutional": "CONSTITUTIONAL", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_farmer_labor": "DEMOCRAT-FARMER-LABOR", "votes_fellowship": "FELLOWSHIP", "votes_good_government": "GOOD GOVERNMENT", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_jeffersonian": "JEFFERSONIAN", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_mich_comm_fed": "MICH. COMM. FED.", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_pres_amer_ind": "PRES. AMER. IND.", "votes_progressive": "PROGRESSIVE", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_victory_without_hate": "VICTORY WITHOUT HATE"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 429, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 388, "registered_not_positive": 429}, "n_stations_flagged": 429, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:46:17.500652", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.717, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.548, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.456, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1944, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1944, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 1944, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.447, "year": 1944, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.773, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 1944, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1944, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.386, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 1944, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.548, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 1944, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 1944, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.294, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.294, "year": 1944, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 1944, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 1944, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 1944, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 1944, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 429}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2d3d1b4baf7744dbbc0e103ab302dea1", "name": "US 1942 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 428)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1942, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1942 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (428 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_labor": "AMERICAN LABOR", "votes_american_progress": "AMERICAN PROGRESS", "votes_citizens_progressive": "CITIZENS PROGRESSIVE", "votes_city_fusion": "CITY FUSION", "votes_communist": "COMMUNIST", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_farmer_labor": "FARMER-LABOR", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_labor": "INDEPENDENT LABOR", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_national_recovery": "NATIONAL RECOVERY", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_pro_townsend": "PRO, TOWNSEND", "votes_progressive": "PROGRESSIVE", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_soc_re": "SOC. RE.", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_townsend": "TOWNSEND", "votes_union": "UNION", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_win_the_war": "WIN THE WAR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 428, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 365, "registered_not_positive": 428}, "n_stations_flagged": 428, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:46:15.588391", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.727, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.888, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.548, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.456, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.727, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1942, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1942, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.588, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 1942, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.771, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 1942, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.773, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 1942, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1942, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 1942, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.548, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 1942, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 1942, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.296, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.296, "year": 1942, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 1942, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 1942, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 1942, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 1942, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 428}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8784d6a2e4d84ec09b3b5d54341351a8", "name": "US 1940 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 428)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1940, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1940 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (428 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_labor": "AMERICAN LABOR", "votes_buono_food_plan": "BUONO FOOD PLAN", "votes_communist": "COMMUNIST", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_farmer_labor": "FARMER-LABOR", "votes_fifteen_dollar_pension": "FIFTEEN DOLLAR PENSION", "votes_fusion": "FUSION", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_for_labor": "INDEPENDENT FOR LABOR", "votes_independent_liberal": "INDEPENDENT LIBERAL", "votes_independent_lincoln_principles": "INDEPENDENT LINCOLN PRINCIPLES", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_jersey_pension": "JERSEY PENSION", "votes_keep_america_neutral": "KEEP AMERICA NEUTRAL", "votes_liberal_democrat": "LIBERAL DEMOCRAT", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_no_wage_tax": "NO WAGE TAX", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_peace": "PEACE", "votes_progressive": "PROGRESSIVE", "votes_progressive_labor": "PROGRESSIVE LABOR", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_roosevelt_new_deal": "ROOSEVELT NEW DEAL", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_state_rights": "STATE RIGHTS", "votes_union": "UNION", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_workers": "WORKERS", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 428, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 389, "registered_not_positive": 428}, "n_stations_flagged": 428, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:46:13.578205", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.717, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.895, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.57, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.472, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1940, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1940, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.586, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 1940, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.451, "year": 1940, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.773, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 1940, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 1940, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.388, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 1940, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 1940, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.472, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.472, "year": 1940, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.307, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.307, "year": 1940, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 1940, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 1940, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 1940, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 1940, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 428}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5bdcd2649b0843ac93bc61ab2be6d7ca", "name": "US 1938 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 428)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1938, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1938 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (428 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_labor": "AMERICAN LABOR", "votes_andrew_jackson": "ANDREW JACKSON", "votes_city_fusion": "CITY FUSION", "votes_communist": "COMMUNIST", "votes_constitutional_democrat": "CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_farmer_labor": "FARMER-LABOR", "votes_general_welfare": "GENERAL WELFARE", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_progressive": "INDEPENDENT PROGRESSIVE", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_independent_socialist": "INDEPENDENT SOCIALIST", "votes_industrial_government": "INDUSTRIAL GOVERNMENT", "votes_kenny_for_congress": "KENNY FOR CONGRESS", "votes_labor": "LABOR", "votes_liberal_labor_choice": "LIBERAL LABOR CHOICE", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_open_book": "OPEN BOOK", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_pensions_for_everybody": "PENSIONS FOR EVERYBODY", "votes_progressive": "PROGRESSIVE", "votes_progressive_democrat": "PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRAT", "votes_progressive_labor": "PROGRESSIVE LABOR", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_socialist_workers": "SOCIALIST WORKERS", "votes_townsend": "TOWNSEND", "votes_union": "UNION", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 428, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 370, "registered_not_positive": 428}, "n_stations_flagged": 428, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:46:11.543205", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.725, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.889, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.562, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.47, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.725, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1938, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1938, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.504, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 1938, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 1938, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1938, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1938, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.014, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 1938, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.562, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 1938, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.47, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.47, "year": 1938, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.294, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.294, "year": 1938, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 1938, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1938, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 1938, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.797, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 1938, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 428}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ffc85ff0c31845b1b83c7e90865a9167", "name": "US 1936 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 428)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1936, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1936 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (428 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_all_peoples": "ALL PEOPLES", "votes_american_labor": "AMERICAN LABOR", "votes_communist": "COMMUNIST", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_ecpole": "ECPOLE", "votes_farmer_labor": "FARMER-LABOR", "votes_father_coughlin_s_principles": "FATHER COUGHLIN'S PRINCIPLES", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_progressive": "PROGRESSIVE", "votes_progressive_democrat": "PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRAT", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_prosperity": "PROSPERITY", "votes_social_justice_union": "SOCIAL JUSTICE UNION", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_square_deal": "SQUARE DEAL", "votes_the_third_party": "THE THIRD PARTY", "votes_townsend": "TOWNSEND", "votes_townsend_non_partisan": "TOWNSEND NON PARTISAN", "votes_townsend_old_age_pension": "TOWNSEND OLD AGE PENSION", "votes_townsend_plan": "TOWNSEND PLAN", "votes_townsend_social_justice": "TOWNSEND SOCIAL JUSTICE", "votes_union": "UNION", "votes_union_progressive": "UNION PROGRESSIVE", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_victory": "VICTORY", "votes_your_party": "YOUR PARTY", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 428, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 428, "cast_gt_registered": 404}, "n_stations_flagged": 428, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:46:09.423284", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.714, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.562, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.471, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 1936, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1936, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.503, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 1936, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.773, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 1936, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1936, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1936, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.02, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 1936, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.562, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 1936, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.471, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.471, "year": 1936, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.293, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.293, "year": 1936, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 1936, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1936, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 1936, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.797, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 1936, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 428}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6313765dad3b45578b4007d9a5a9c229", "name": "US 1934 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 428)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1934, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1934 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (428 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_vic": "'VIC'", "votes_cincinnatus_nonpartisan_movement": "CINCINNATUS NONPARTISAN MOVEMENT", "votes_citizens": "CITIZENS", "votes_city_fusion": "CITY FUSION", "votes_communist": "COMMUNIST", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_equal_rights": "EQUAL RIGHTS", "votes_farmer_labor": "FARMER-LABOR", "votes_honest_elections": "HONEST ELECTIONS", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_citizens": "INDEPENDENT CITIZENS", "votes_independent_communist": "INDEPENDENT COMMUNIST", "votes_law_preservation": "LAW PRESERVATION", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_lincoln_fair_deal": "LINCOLN FAIR DEAL", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_national_progressive": "NATIONAL PROGRESSIVE", "votes_new_era": "NEW ERA", "votes_old_age_pension": "OLD AGE PENSION", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_people_s": "PEOPLE'S", "votes_progressive": "PROGRESSIVE", "votes_progressive_democrat": "PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRAT", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_rich_county_independent": "RICH COUNTY INDEPENDENT", "votes_roosevelt": "ROOSEVELT", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_veterans": "VETERANS", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 428, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 428, "cast_gt_registered": 375}, "n_stations_flagged": 428, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:46:07.363838", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.725, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.553, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.464, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.725, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1934, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1934, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 1934, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.447, "year": 1934, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1934, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1934, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.021, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 1934, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.553, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 1934, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 1934, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.289, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 1934, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1934, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1934, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 1934, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.797, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 1934, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 428}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "79bae544183842d88ab4a199c296d5fb", "name": "US 1932 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 388)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1932, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1932 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (388 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american": "AMERICAN", "votes_black_and_tan_republican": "BLACK AND TAN REPUBLICAN", "votes_citizens": "CITIZENS", "votes_civil_sec": "CIVIL SEC.", "votes_communist": "COMMUNIST", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_enf_all": "ENF. ALL", "votes_fair_play": "FAIR PLAY", "votes_farmer_labor": "FARMER-LABOR", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_communist": "INDEPENDENT COMMUNIST", "votes_independent_dry": "INDEPENDENT DRY", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_jeffersonian": "JEFFERSONIAN", "votes_jobless": "JOBLESS", "votes_law_preservation": "LAW PRESERVATION", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_liberty": "LIBERTY", "votes_lily_white_republican": "LILY-WHITE REPUBLICAN", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_national_party": "NATIONAL PARTY", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_people_s": "PEOPLE'S", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_repeal": "REPEAL", "votes_roosevelt": "ROOSEVELT", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_united_dry": "UNITED DRY", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 388, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 388, "cast_gt_registered": 364}, "n_stations_flagged": 388, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:46:05.403526", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.717, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.89, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.549, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.461, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.287, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 1932, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 1932, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1932, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1932, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.032, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.508, "year": 1932, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.549, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 1932, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.461, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.461, "year": 1932, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.266, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.266, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 1932, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 1932, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 1932, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 388}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2fa45978be8747699c5c6d49cf921115", "name": "US 1930 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 430)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1930, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1930 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (430 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_national": "AMERICAN NATIONAL", "votes_communist": "COMMUNIST", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_farmer_labor": "FARMER-LABOR", "votes_ind_l_sav": "IND. L. SAV.", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_citizens_alliance": "INDEPENDENT CITIZENS ALLIANCE", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_independent_socialist": "INDEPENDENT SOCIALIST", "votes_labor": "LABOR", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_liberty": "LIBERTY", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_national_party": "NATIONAL PARTY", "votes_original_democrat": "ORIGINAL DEMOCRAT", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_repeal_league": "REPEAL LEAGUE", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_united": "UNITED", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_volstead_act_republican": "VOLSTEAD ACT REPUBLICAN", "votes_workers": "WORKERS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 430, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 430, "cast_gt_registered": 365}, "n_stations_flagged": 430, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:59.399257", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.722, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.891, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.53, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.446, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.722, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 1930, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1930, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.291, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 1930, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.446, "year": 1930, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1930, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1930, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.026, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 1930, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.53, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.53, "year": 1930, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.446, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.446, "year": 1930, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 1930, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1930, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1930, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 1930, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 1930, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 430}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "51045a1a0b8742dab22fc4f2248ba207", "name": "US 1928 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 430)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1928, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1928 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (430 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_farmer_labor": "FARMER-LABOR", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_independent_voters": "INDEPENDENT VOTERS", "votes_labor": "LABOR", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_workers": "WORKERS", "votes_workers_communist_party_of_america": "WORKERS (COMMUNIST) PARTY OF AMERICA", "votes_workers_party": "WORKERS PARTY"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 430, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 378, "registered_not_positive": 430}, "n_stations_flagged": 430, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:57.195611", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.668, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.889, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.532, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.445, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.668, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1928, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1928, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.288, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 1928, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.447, "year": 1928, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1928, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1928, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.012, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 1928, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.532, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.532, "year": 1928, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.445, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 1928, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.245, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.245, "year": 1928, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1928, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1928, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.066, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.066, "year": 1928, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 1928, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 430}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a699e8c0e4ef4cf1a41c4cfcb3b74873", "name": "US 1926 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 430)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1926, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1926 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (430 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_commonwealth_land_party": "COMMONWEALTH LAND PARTY", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_dry_independent": "DRY INDEPENDENT", "votes_farmer_labor": "FARMER-LABOR", "votes_high_life": "HIGH LIFE", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_progressive_republicans": "INDEPENDENT - PROGRESSIVE - REPUBLICANS", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_la_follette_independent": "LA FOLLETTE INDEPENDENT", "votes_labor": "LABOR", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_progressive": "PROGRESSIVE", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_radical": "RADICAL", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_t_p_i": "T-P-I", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_workers": "WORKERS", "votes_workers_communist_party_of_america": "WORKERS (COMMUNIST) PARTY OF AMERICA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 430, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 375, "registered_not_positive": 430}, "n_stations_flagged": 430, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:55.236340", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.663, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.89, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.533, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.445, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1926, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1926, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.296, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 1926, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.79, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.448, "year": 1926, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1926, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1926, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.021, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 1926, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.533, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.533, "year": 1926, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.445, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 1926, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 1926, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1926, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1926, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.066, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.066, "year": 1926, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 1926, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 430}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c9df4bd0dddc48e0b83d2dfa593e1d7e", "name": "US 1924 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 430)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1924, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1924 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (430 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american": "AMERICAN", "votes_commonwealth_land_party": "COMMONWEALTH LAND PARTY", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_farmer_labor": "FARMER-LABOR", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_progressive": "INDEPENDENT PROGRESSIVE", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_independent_wet": "INDEPENDENT WET", "votes_industrialist": "INDUSTRIALIST", "votes_la_follette": "LA FOLLETTE", "votes_la_follette_independent": "LA FOLLETTE INDEPENDENT", "votes_la_follette_progressive": "LA FOLLETTE-PROGRESSIVE", "votes_labor": "LABOR", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_progressive": "PROGRESSIVE", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_socialist_la_follette": "SOCIALIST-LA FOLLETTE", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_war_veteran": "WAR VETERAN", "votes_wet_independent": "WET INDEPENDENT", "votes_workers": "WORKERS", "votes_workers_communist_party_of_america": "WORKERS (COMMUNIST) PARTY OF AMERICA", "votes_workers_party": "WORKERS PARTY", "votes_workers_party_of_america": "WORKERS PARTY OF AMERICA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 430, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 430, "cast_gt_registered": 387}, "n_stations_flagged": 430, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:53.270508", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.663, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.528, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.443, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1924, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1924, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.288, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 1924, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.447, "year": 1924, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1924, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1924, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.019, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 1924, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.528, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.528, "year": 1924, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.443, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 1924, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.243, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.243, "year": 1924, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1924, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1924, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.077, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.077, "year": 1924, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 1924, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 430}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "84fe3ef611fb47519aa023702c8a6baa", "name": "US 1922 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 431)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1922, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1922 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (431 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_consumers_non_partisan": "CONSUMERS NON PARTISAN", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_farmer_labor": "FARMER-LABOR", "votes_forward": "FORWARD", "votes_inalienable": "INALIENABLE", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_independent_socialist": "INDEPENDENT SOCIALIST", "votes_industrial_labor": "INDUSTRIAL LABOR", "votes_industrialist": "INDUSTRIALIST", "votes_labor": "LABOR", "votes_lancaster": "LANCASTER", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_nonpartisan_league": "NONPARTISAN LEAGUE", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_people_s": "PEOPLE'S", "votes_progressive": "PROGRESSIVE", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_roosevelt": "ROOSEVELT", "votes_single_tax": "SINGLE TAX", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_union": "UNION", "votes_united_labor": "UNITED LABOR", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_voters_league": "VOTERS LEAGUE", "votes_welfare": "WELFARE", "votes_workers_party": "WORKERS PARTY"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 431, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 399, "registered_not_positive": 431}, "n_stations_flagged": 431, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:51.346740", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.668, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.514, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.431, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.668, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.292, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 1922, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.445, "year": 1922, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1922, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1922, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.019, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 1922, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.514, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.514, "year": 1922, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.431, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 1922, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.238, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.238, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1922, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.091, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.091, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 1922, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 431}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "067cdbaddbd14992acc9f092a272a675", "name": "US 1920 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 427)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1920, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1920 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (427 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_against_wilson_league": "AGAINST WILSON LEAGUE", "votes_american": "AMERICAN", "votes_american_free_independent": "AMERICAN FREE INDEPENDENT", "votes_black_and_tan_republican": "BLACK AND TAN REPUBLICAN", "votes_citizens": "CITIZENS", "votes_colored_republican": "COLORED REPUBLICAN", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_enforcement_of_volstead_act": "ENFORCEMENT OF VOLSTEAD ACT", "votes_farmer_labor": "FARMER-LABOR", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_non_partisan": "INDEPENDENT NON-PARTISAN", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_industrial_labor": "INDUSTRIAL LABOR", "votes_industrialist": "INDUSTRIALIST", "votes_labor": "LABOR", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_people_s_candidate_the": "PEOPLE'S CANDIDATE, THE", "votes_progressive": "PROGRESSIVE", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_single_tax": "SINGLE TAX", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_white_republican": "WHITE REPUBLICAN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 427, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 403, "registered_not_positive": 427}, "n_stations_flagged": 427, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:49.335651", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.577, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.895, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.51, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.429, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.577, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 1920, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1920, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.271, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 1920, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.461, "year": 1920, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1920, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1920, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.025, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 1920, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.51, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.51, "year": 1920, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.429, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 1920, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.233, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.233, "year": 1920, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 1920, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1920, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.077, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.077, "year": 1920, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 1920, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 427}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "110a9fa6a89c467ab542a4e49a775436", "name": "US 1918 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 427)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1918, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1918 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (427 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_business_men": "BUSINESS MEN", "votes_citizens": "CITIZENS", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_fair_play": "FAIR PLAY", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_progressive": "INDEPENDENT PROGRESSIVE", "votes_independent_social_democrat": "INDEPENDENT SOCIAL DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_national": "INDEPENDENT-NATIONAL", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_national_party": "NATIONAL PARTY", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_single_tax": "SINGLE TAX", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_t_meet": "T. MEET", "votes_union_labor": "UNION LABOR", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_washington": "WASHINGTON"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 427, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 427, "cast_gt_registered": 353}, "n_stations_flagged": 427, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:47.431508", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.572, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.899, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.403, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.358, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.572, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.394, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 1918, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.757, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 1918, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1918, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1918, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.867, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 1918, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.403, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 1918, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.358, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.358, "year": 1918, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.18, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.18, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.701, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 1918, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.939, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.068, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.068, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 1918, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 427}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3d0bec25d7bc43fba2ac5666b21d3908", "name": "US 1916 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 424)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1916, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1916 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (424 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american": "AMERICAN", "votes_bull_moose": "BULL MOOSE", "votes_colored": "COLORED", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_progressive": "INDEPENDENT PROGRESSIVE", "votes_industrialist": "INDUSTRIALIST", "votes_keystone": "KEYSTONE", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_national_progressive": "NATIONAL PROGRESSIVE", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_personal_liberty": "PERSONAL LIBERTY", "votes_progressive": "PROGRESSIVE", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_roosevelt_progressive": "ROOSEVELT PROGRESSIVE", "votes_single_tax": "SINGLE TAX", "votes_social_democrat": "SOCIAL DEMOCRAT", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_union": "UNION", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_washington": "WASHINGTON"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 424, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 424, "cast_gt_registered": 399}, "n_stations_flagged": 424, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:45.564147", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.33, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.751, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.419, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.33, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 1916, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.751, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 1916, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 1916, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.436, "year": 1916, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1916, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1916, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.853, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.463, "year": 1916, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.419, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.419, "year": 1916, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 1916, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.186, "year": 1916, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.725, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.725, "year": 1916, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1916, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.068, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.068, "year": 1916, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.755, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 1916, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 424}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "484ab0f5245740f1a99436c07594f491", "name": "US 1914 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 424)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1914, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1914 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (424 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anti_boss": "ANTI-BOSS", "votes_bull_moose": "BULL MOOSE", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_elec_prog": "ELEC. PROG.", "votes_independence_league": "INDEPENDENCE LEAGUE", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_prohibition": "INDEPENDENT PROHIBITION", "votes_independent_progressive_socialist": "INDEPENDENT-PROGRESSIVE-SOCIALIST", "votes_independent_public_ownership": "INDEPENDENT-PUBLIC OWNERSHIP", "votes_industrialist": "INDUSTRIALIST", "votes_keystone": "KEYSTONE", "votes_labor": "LABOR", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_national_progressive": "NATIONAL PROGRESSIVE", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_personal_liberty": "PERSONAL LIBERTY", "votes_progressive": "PROGRESSIVE", "votes_progressive_and_businessmen_s": "PROGRESSIVE AND BUSINESSMEN'S", "votes_progressive_democrat": "PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRAT", "votes_progressive_republican": "PROGRESSIVE REPUBLICAN", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_public_ownership": "PUBLIC OWNERSHIP", "votes_regular_democrat": "REGULAR DEMOCRAT", "votes_roosevelt_progressive": "ROOSEVELT PROGRESSIVE", "votes_social_democrat": "SOCIAL DEMOCRAT", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_washington": "WASHINGTON", "votes_wilson_independent": "WILSON INDEPENDENT", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 424, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 424, "cast_gt_registered": 396}, "n_stations_flagged": 424, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:43.631110", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.58, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.898, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.418, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.369, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.58, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 1914, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.898, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1914, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 1914, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.749, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 1914, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1914, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1914, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 1914, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.418, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.418, "year": 1914, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.369, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.369, "year": 1914, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.186, "year": 1914, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.73, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.73, "year": 1914, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1914, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.078, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.078, "year": 1914, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 1914, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 424}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fb95373ed8db4ae6b9409433e1855c1f", "name": "US 1912 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 416)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1912, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1912 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (416 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_taft_for_president": "'TAFT FOR PRESIDENT'", "votes_bull_moose": "BULL MOOSE", "votes_c_w": "C. W.", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_independence_league": "INDEPENDENCE LEAGUE", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_industrialist": "INDUSTRIALIST", "votes_jefferson": "JEFFERSON", "votes_keystone": "KEYSTONE", "votes_lincoln": "LINCOLN", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_national_progressive": "NATIONAL PROGRESSIVE", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_progressive": "PROGRESSIVE", "votes_progressive_republican": "PROGRESSIVE REPUBLICAN", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_public_ownership": "PUBLIC OWNERSHIP", "votes_roosevelt_progressive": "ROOSEVELT PROGRESSIVE", "votes_social_democrat": "SOCIAL DEMOCRAT", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_washington": "WASHINGTON", "votes_workingmen_s_party_or_league": "WORKINGMEN'S PARTY OR LEAGUE"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 416, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 416, "cast_gt_registered": 385}, "n_stations_flagged": 416, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:41.761017", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.564, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.898, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.426, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.373, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 1912, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.898, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1912, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.392, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1912, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.748, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 1912, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1912, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1912, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.465, "year": 1912, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.426, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.426, "year": 1912, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 1912, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.186, "year": 1912, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1912, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1912, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.097, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.097, "year": 1912, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 1912, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 416}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "77eb5e067a0b4d7a974bfc293e3ab38b", "name": "US 1910 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 377)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1910, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1910 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (377 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_civ_a": "'CIV. A'", "votes_ind_cong": "'IND. CONG.'", "votes_american": "AMERICAN", "votes_city_party": "CITY PARTY", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_direct_people_s_candidate": "DIRECT PEOPLE'S CANDIDATE", "votes_federated_labor": "FEDERATED LABOR", "votes_independence_league": "INDEPENDENCE LEAGUE", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_industrialist": "INDUSTRIALIST", "votes_keystone": "KEYSTONE", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_people_s_labor": "PEOPLE'S LABOR", "votes_progressive": "PROGRESSIVE", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_public_ownership": "PUBLIC OWNERSHIP", "votes_social_democrat": "SOCIAL DEMOCRAT", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_union_labor": "UNION LABOR", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_william_penn": "WILLIAM PENN", "votes_workingmen_s_party_or_league": "WORKINGMEN'S PARTY OR LEAGUE"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 377, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 348, "registered_not_positive": 377}, "n_stations_flagged": 377, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:39.940975", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.572, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.898, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.421, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.368, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.572, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.898, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.407, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.749, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 1910, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1910, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1910, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.853, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.463, "year": 1910, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.421, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 1910, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.368, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 1910, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.185, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.185, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1910, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.097, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.097, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 1910, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 377}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2b14551b0b5a4c138b77e390167eb206", "name": "US 1908 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 384)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1908, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1908 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (384 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american": "AMERICAN", "votes_city_party": "CITY PARTY", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_direct_nomination": "DIRECT NOMINATION", "votes_free_trade": "FREE TRADE", "votes_independence": "INDEPENDENCE", "votes_independence_league": "INDEPENDENCE LEAGUE", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_people_s": "PEOPLE'S", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_public_ownership": "PUBLIC OWNERSHIP", "votes_scales_of_justice": "SCALES OF JUSTICE", "votes_social_democrat": "SOCIAL DEMOCRAT", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_taft_republican": "TAFT REPUBLICAN", "votes_union_labor": "UNION LABOR", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 384, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 360, "registered_not_positive": 384}, "n_stations_flagged": 384, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:38.098795", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.54, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.897, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.42, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.367, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 1908, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1908, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.183, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 1908, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.747, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 1908, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1908, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1908, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.725, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 1908, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.42, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.42, "year": 1908, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.367, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.367, "year": 1908, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.184, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 1908, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1908, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1908, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.115, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.115, "year": 1908, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 1908, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 384}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "70daa3919c2d4b49a6a757fc52a9b97f", "name": "US 1906 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 378)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1906, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1906 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (378 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_ind_cong": "'IND. CONG.'", "votes_american": "AMERICAN", "votes_blacksmith": "BLACKSMITH", "votes_bryan_party": "BRYAN PARTY", "votes_butter_congressional": "BUTTER CONGRESSIONAL", "votes_citizens": "CITIZENS", "votes_commonwealth_party": "COMMONWEALTH PARTY", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_independence_league": "INDEPENDENCE LEAGUE", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_labor": "INDEPENDENT LABOR", "votes_independent_league": "INDEPENDENT LEAGUE", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_jefferson": "JEFFERSON", "votes_lincoln": "LINCOLN", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_people_s": "PEOPLE'S", "votes_populist": "POPULIST", "votes_progressive_alliance": "PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_public_ownership": "PUBLIC OWNERSHIP", "votes_reorganized_republican": "REORGANIZED REPUBLICAN", "votes_roosevelt_social_democrat": "ROOSEVELT SOCIAL DEMOCRAT", "votes_social_democrat": "SOCIAL DEMOCRAT", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_union_labor": "UNION LABOR", "votes_united_labor": "UNITED LABOR", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 378, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 348, "registered_not_positive": 378}, "n_stations_flagged": 378, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:36.350967", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.543, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.9, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.418, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.367, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.543, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.9, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.185, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 1906, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 1906, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1906, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1906, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.432, "year": 1906, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.418, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.418, "year": 1906, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.367, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.367, "year": 1906, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.183, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.183, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1906, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.115, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.115, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 1906, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 378}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "94c2919fe46043e6a8083b7947a3539e", "name": "US 1904 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 377)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1904, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1904 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (377 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american": "AMERICAN", "votes_citizen_independent": "CITIZEN INDEPENDENT", "votes_citizens": "CITIZENS", "votes_continental": "CONTINENTAL", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_fusion": "FUSION", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_labor": "LABOR", "votes_liberty": "LIBERTY", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_parker_and_davis": "PARKER AND DAVIS", "votes_people_s": "PEOPLE'S", "votes_people_s_and_democrat": "PEOPLE'S AND DEMOCRAT", "votes_populist": "POPULIST", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_pure_politics": "PURE POLITICS", "votes_social_democrat": "SOCIAL DEMOCRAT", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_stalwart_silver": "STALWART SILVER", "votes_union": "UNION", "votes_union_labor": "UNION LABOR", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 377, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 377, "cast_gt_registered": 364}, "n_stations_flagged": 377, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:34.634056", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.542, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.421, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.367, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.542, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 1904, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1904, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.182, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 1904, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.747, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 1904, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1904, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1904, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 1904, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.421, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 1904, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.367, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.367, "year": 1904, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.184, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 1904, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 1904, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1904, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.115, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.115, "year": 1904, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 1904, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 377}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8dce459c31544960929b1c9e5ef6f4be", "name": "US 1902 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 377)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1902, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1902 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (377 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_allied": "ALLIED", "votes_allied_people_s": "ALLIED PEOPLE'S", "votes_anti_machine": "ANTI-MACHINE", "votes_anti_monopolist": "ANTI-MONOPOLIST", "votes_ballot_reform": "BALLOT REFORM", "votes_citizens": "CITIZENS", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat_and_citizen": "DEMOCRAT AND CITIZEN", "votes_fusion": "FUSION", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_l_s_l": "L. S. L.", "votes_labor": "LABOR", "votes_liberty": "LIBERTY", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_people_s": "PEOPLE'S", "votes_populist": "POPULIST", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_regular": "REGULAR", "votes_social_democrat": "SOCIAL DEMOCRAT", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_union": "UNION", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_workingmen_s_party_or_league": "WORKINGMEN'S PARTY OR LEAGUE"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 377, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 377, "cast_gt_registered": 355}, "n_stations_flagged": 377, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:32.840963", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.365, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.911, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.421, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.368, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.365, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 1902, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.911, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 1902, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.12, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 1902, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.874, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1902, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1902, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1902, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.734, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.433, "year": 1902, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.421, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 1902, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.368, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 1902, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.184, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 1902, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.735, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 1902, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1902, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.115, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.115, "year": 1902, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 1902, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 377}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ab885998e7654155b0123fb3280b9202", "name": "US 1900 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 350)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1900, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1900 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (350 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anti_trust_a_t": "ANTI-TRUST (A.T.)", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_fusion": "FUSION", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_citizens": "INDEPENDENT CITIZENS", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_prohibition": "INDEPENDENT PROHIBITION", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_independent_workers_party": "INDEPENDENT WORKERS PARTY", "votes_liberal_sunday_law": "LIBERAL SUNDAY LAW", "votes_middle_of_the_road_populist": "MIDDLE OF THE ROAD POPULIST", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_municipal_league_party_m_l": "MUNICIPAL LEAGUE PARTY (M.L.)", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_people_s": "PEOPLE'S", "votes_populist": "POPULIST", "votes_progressive_people_s": "PROGRESSIVE PEOPLE'S", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_referendum": "REFERENDUM", "votes_single_tax": "SINGLE TAX", "votes_social_democrat": "SOCIAL DEMOCRAT", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_union_reform": "UNION REFORM", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_workingmen_s_party_or_league": "WORKINGMEN'S PARTY OR LEAGUE"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 350, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 350, "cast_gt_registered": 349}, "n_stations_flagged": 350, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:31.182263", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.55, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.896, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.419, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.367, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.55, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.179, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 1900, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.751, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 1900, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1900, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1900, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.725, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 1900, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.419, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.419, "year": 1900, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.367, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.367, "year": 1900, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.184, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1900, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.115, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.115, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.77, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 1900, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 350}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f50e43d4adf345b99cfe464500ac930b", "name": "US 1898 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 350)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1898, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1898 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (350 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_butter_congressional": "BUTTER CONGRESSIONAL", "votes_chicago_platform_democracy": "CHICAGO PLATFORM DEMOCRACY", "votes_citizens_democrat": "CITIZENS DEMOCRAT", "votes_colored_republican": "COLORED REPUBLICAN", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_fusion": "FUSION", "votes_honest_government": "HONEST GOVERNMENT", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_populist": "INDEPENDENT POPULIST", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_league_island_development": "LEAGUE ISLAND DEVELOPMENT", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_loyal_democrat": "LOYAL DEMOCRAT", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_people_s": "PEOPLE'S", "votes_people_s_independent": "PEOPLE'S INDEPENDENT", "votes_populist": "POPULIST", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_republican_citizens": "REPUBLICAN CITIZENS", "votes_robinson_citizen_party": "ROBINSON CITIZEN PARTY", "votes_silver_republican": "SILVER REPUBLICAN", "votes_social_democrat": "SOCIAL DEMOCRAT", "votes_social_labor": "SOCIAL LABOR", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_union": "UNION", "votes_union_reform": "UNION REFORM", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 350, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 348, "registered_not_positive": 350}, "n_stations_flagged": 350, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:29.373660", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.184, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.79, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.413, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.364, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.184, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 1898, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.79, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1898, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.003, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 1898, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.089, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.522, "year": 1898, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1898, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1898, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.725, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 1898, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.413, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 1898, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.364, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.364, "year": 1898, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.184, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 1898, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1898, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1898, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1898, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 1898, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 350}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "af80d239c2454a5b9238892e30cb4ddd", "name": "US 1896 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 350)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1896, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1896 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (350 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_addicks_republican": "ADDICKS REPUBLICAN", "votes_black_and_tan_republican": "BLACK AND TAN REPUBLICAN", "votes_butler_republican": "BUTLER REPUBLICAN", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_free_silver": "FREE SILVER", "votes_fusion": "FUSION", "votes_higgins_republican": "HIGGINS REPUBLICAN", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_jeffersonian": "JEFFERSONIAN", "votes_lily_white_republican": "LILY-WHITE REPUBLICAN", "votes_mc_kinley_citizen": "MC KINLEY CITIZEN", "votes_mc_kinley_sound_money": "MC KINLEY SOUND MONEY", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_national_democrat": "NATIONAL DEMOCRAT", "votes_national_party": "NATIONAL PARTY", "votes_national_populist": "NATIONAL POPULIST", "votes_national_republican": "NATIONAL REPUBLICAN", "votes_national_sound_money_democrat": "NATIONAL SOUND MONEY DEMOCRAT", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_people_s": "PEOPLE'S", "votes_populist": "POPULIST", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_protectionist": "PROTECTIONIST", "votes_republican_citizens": "REPUBLICAN CITIZENS", "votes_rob_republican": "ROB. REPUBLICAN", "votes_silver_republican": "SILVER REPUBLICAN", "votes_social_labor": "SOCIAL LABOR", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_other_minor": "Other / minor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 350, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 350, "cast_gt_registered": 350}, "n_stations_flagged": 350, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:27.629992", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.184, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.793, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.395, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.353, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.184, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 1896, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.793, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1896, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.028, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 1896, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.084, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 1896, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1896, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1896, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 1896, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.353, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.353, "year": 1896, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1896, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1896, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1896, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 1896, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 350}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "63d20c034f664a788a50ee5e8e4788a0", "name": "US 1894 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 349)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1894, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1894 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (349 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_citizen": "AMERICAN CITIZEN", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_fusion": "FUSION", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democracy": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRACY", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_populist": "INDEPENDENT POPULIST", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_labor": "LABOR", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_people_s": "PEOPLE'S", "votes_populist": "POPULIST", "votes_populist_independent": "POPULIST INDEPENDENT", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_social_democrat": "SOCIAL DEMOCRAT", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_state_democrat": "STATE DEMOCRAT", "votes_straight_democrat": "STRAIGHT DEMOCRAT", "votes_straight_people_party": "STRAIGHT PEOPLE PARTY", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_workingmen": "WORKINGMEN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 349, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 349, "cast_gt_registered": 349}, "n_stations_flagged": 349, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:25.876776", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.253, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.795, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.335, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.319, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.253, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 1894, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1894, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.038, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 1894, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.072, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.518, "year": 1894, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1894, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1894, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.335, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 1894, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.319, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.319, "year": 1894, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1894, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1894, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1894, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 1894, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 349}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "84ce2fe0211944a98390d3d8fb996935", "name": "US 1892 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 348)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1892, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1892 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (348 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_cook_county_reform_league": "COOK COUNTY REFORM LEAGUE", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_industrial_people_s_union": "INDUSTRIAL PEOPLE'S UNION", "votes_kolbite_populist": "KOLBITE POPULIST", "votes_lily_white_republican": "LILY-WHITE REPUBLICAN", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_negro": "NEGRO", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_people_s": "PEOPLE'S", "votes_populist": "POPULIST", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_silver": "SILVER", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_union_labor": "UNION LABOR", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 348, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 348, "registered_not_positive": 348}, "n_stations_flagged": 348, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:24.140830", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.288, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.774, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.329, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.316, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.288, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.572, "year": 1892, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.985, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 1892, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.329, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.329, "year": 1892, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 1892, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1892, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 1892, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 348}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9691247ef3944bf6bdc0b85746a64a04", "name": "US 1890 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 327)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1890, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1890 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (327 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alliance": "ALLIANCE", "votes_county_democrat": "COUNTY DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_farmers_alliance": "FARMERS' ALLIANCE", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_industrial": "INDUSTRIAL", "votes_labor": "LABOR", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_people_s": "PEOPLE'S", "votes_peoples_independent_republican": "PEOPLES INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_populist": "POPULIST", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_reform_democrat": "REFORM DEMOCRAT", "votes_socialist_labor": "SOCIALIST LABOR", "votes_union": "UNION", "votes_union_labor": "UNION LABOR", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 327, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 323, "registered_not_positive": 327}, "n_stations_flagged": 327, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:22.540717", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.274, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.78, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.323, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.312, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.274, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 1890, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1890, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.018, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 1890, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.347, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.087, "year": 1890, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1890, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1890, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.323, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.323, "year": 1890, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.312, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.312, "year": 1890, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1890, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1890, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1890, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 1890, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 327}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0a317a228cbe4936b2f1e03c1b140aee", "name": "US 1888 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 321)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1888, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1888 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (321 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_1888": "AMERICAN (1888)", "votes_citizen_and_county_democrat": "CITIZEN AND COUNTY DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_labor": "LABOR", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_tammany_democrat": "TAMMANY DEMOCRAT", "votes_union_labor": "UNION LABOR", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 321, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 319, "registered_not_positive": 321}, "n_stations_flagged": 321, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:21.063019", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.406, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.793, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.33, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.316, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.406, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 1888, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.793, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1888, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.018, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 1888, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.367, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.092, "year": 1888, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1888, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1888, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.33, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 1888, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 1888, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 1888, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1888, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1888, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.742, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 1888, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 321}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "72bfab8c297b41f7b64c5ef5cf059274", "name": "US 1886 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 321)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1886, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1886 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (321 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_agricultural_wheeler": "AGRICULTURAL WHEELER", "votes_anti_monopoly": "ANTI MONOPOLY", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_fusion": "FUSION", "votes_greenback": "GREENBACK", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_labor": "LABOR", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_national_party": "NATIONAL PARTY", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_temperance_reform": "TEMPERANCE REFORM", "votes_union_labor": "UNION LABOR", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 321, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 315, "registered_not_positive": 321}, "n_stations_flagged": 321, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:19.505953", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.272, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.377, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.325, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.314, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.272, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.568, "year": 1886, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.377, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.344, "year": 1886, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.001, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 1886, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.089, "year": 1886, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1886, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1886, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.325, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.325, "year": 1886, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.314, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.314, "year": 1886, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 1886, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1886, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1886, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.742, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 1886, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 321}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fd813ae8ad1e4cf59a1cdb19d0af79bc", "name": "US 1884 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 321)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1884, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1884 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (321 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_county_democrat": "COUNTY DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_fusion": "FUSION", "votes_greenback": "GREENBACK", "votes_greenback_labor": "GREENBACK LABOR", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_labor_reform": "LABOR REFORM", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_national_party": "NATIONAL PARTY", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_tammany_democrat": "TAMMANY DEMOCRAT", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 321, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 315, "registered_not_positive": 321}, "n_stations_flagged": 321, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:17.865284", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.401, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.782, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.33, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.316, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.401, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.35, "year": 1884, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.043, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 1884, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.33, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 1884, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 1884, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1884, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1884, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1884, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 321}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3c0c95339fb042dd84b4a24752e9f3bb", "name": "US 1882 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 315)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1882, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1882 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (315 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anti_monopoly": "ANTI MONOPOLY", "votes_bolting_greenback": "BOLTING GREENBACK", "votes_civil_service_reform": "CIVIL SERVICE REFORM", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_free_trade": "FREE TRADE", "votes_fusion": "FUSION", "votes_greenback": "GREENBACK", "votes_greenback_labor": "GREENBACK LABOR", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_greenback": "INDEPENDENT GREENBACK", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_labor": "LABOR", "votes_liberal": "LIBERAL", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_readjuster": "READJUSTER", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_state_credit_democrat": "STATE CREDIT DEMOCRAT", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 315, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 314, "registered_not_positive": 315}, "n_stations_flagged": 315, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:16.268400", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.269, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.783, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.333, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.318, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.269, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.567, "year": 1882, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1882, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.028, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 1882, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.35, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.087, "year": 1882, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1882, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1882, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.333, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.333, "year": 1882, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.318, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 1882, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1882, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1882, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1882, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1882, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 315}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b8831518741245b985abc7c8ec7515bf", "name": "US 1880 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 288)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1880, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1880 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (288 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_greenback": "GREENBACK", "votes_greenback_democrat": "GREENBACK DEMOCRAT", "votes_greenback_labor": "GREENBACK LABOR", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_low_tax_democrat": "LOW TAX DEMOCRAT", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_readjuster": "READJUSTER", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_temperance": "TEMPERANCE", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 288, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 288, "cast_gt_registered": 285}, "n_stations_flagged": 288, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:10.722578", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.27, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.792, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.333, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.318, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.27, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.568, "year": 1880, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.792, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1880, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.02, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 1880, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.354, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.088, "year": 1880, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1880, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1880, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.333, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.333, "year": 1880, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.318, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 1880, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1880, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1880, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1880, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1880, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 288}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0c649088231848eb9cf8067987166e4e", "name": "US 1878 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 220)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1878, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1878 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (220 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anti_tammany": "ANTI TAMMANY", "votes_butler_democrat": "BUTLER DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_greenback": "GREENBACK", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_greenback": "INDEPENDENT GREENBACK", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_labor": "LABOR", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_national_party": "NATIONAL PARTY", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_socialist": "SOCIALIST", "votes_tammany_democrat": "TAMMANY DEMOCRAT", "votes_temperance": "TEMPERANCE", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 220, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 219, "registered_not_positive": 220}, "n_stations_flagged": 220, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:09.392910", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.267, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.786, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.327, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.315, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.267, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.567, "year": 1878, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1878, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.013, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.753, "year": 1878, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.369, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.092, "year": 1878, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1878, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1878, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.327, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.327, "year": 1878, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.315, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.315, "year": 1878, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1878, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1878, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1878, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1878, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 220}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "31d295b848054922a1e84f5d0ad7f638", "name": "US 1876 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 225)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1876, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1876 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (225 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_reform": "AMERICAN REFORM", "votes_bolting_democrat": "BOLTING DEMOCRAT", "votes_colored_republican": "COLORED REPUBLICAN", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_greenback": "GREENBACK", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_greenback": "INDEPENDENT GREENBACK", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 225, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 225, "cast_gt_registered": 222}, "n_stations_flagged": 225, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:08.027489", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.411, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.788, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.332, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.318, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.353, "year": 1876, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.788, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1876, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.665, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1876, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.354, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.088, "year": 1876, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1876, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1876, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.332, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.332, "year": 1876, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.318, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 1876, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1876, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1876, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1876, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1876, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 225}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b5cf8acc7ad240dab5e822a24642178c", "name": "US 1874 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 190)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1874, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1874 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (190 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative_old": "CONSERVATIVE (OLD)", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_granger": "GRANGER", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_reform_democrat": "INDEPENDENT REFORM DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_reform": "REFORM", "votes_temperance": "TEMPERANCE", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 190, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 190, "cast_gt_registered": 182}, "n_stations_flagged": 190, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:06.710341", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.262, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.797, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.334, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.318, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.262, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.566, "year": 1874, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.797, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.334, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.334, "year": 1874, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.318, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 1874, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1874, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1874, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 190}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ac051a830e6c420582d7007136bc8cbe", "name": "US 1872 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 194)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1872, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1872 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (194 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_apollo_hall": "APOLLO HALL", "votes_brindle_tail_republican": "BRINDLE-TAIL REPUBLICAN", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_liberal_republican": "LIBERAL REPUBLICAN", "votes_minstrel_republican": "MINSTREL REPUBLICAN", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_straight_democrat": "STRAIGHT DEMOCRAT", "votes_temperance": "TEMPERANCE", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 194, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 194, "registered_not_positive": 194}, "n_stations_flagged": 194, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:05.523794", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.288, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.781, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.335, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.319, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.288, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.572, "year": 1872, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.672, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.362, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.09, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.335, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 1872, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.319, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.319, "year": 1872, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1872, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1872, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1872, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 194}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0c9b8cf42dc7483fa0027d82896c1991", "name": "US 1870 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 171)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1870, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1870 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (171 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative_old": "CONSERVATIVE (OLD)", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_liberal_republican": "LIBERAL REPUBLICAN", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_prohibition": "PROHIBITION", "votes_temperance": "TEMPERANCE", "votes_young_democracy": "YOUNG DEMOCRACY"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 171, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 171, "cast_gt_registered": 166}, "n_stations_flagged": 171, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:03.416490", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.281, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.787, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.342, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.323, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.281, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 1870, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1870, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.664, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1870, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.336, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.084, "year": 1870, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1870, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1870, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.342, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.342, "year": 1870, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.323, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.323, "year": 1870, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1870, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1870, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 1870, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1870, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 171}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3d550ca2642b4f5bb790c4e5116de637", "name": "US 1868 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 168)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1868, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1868 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (168 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative_old": "CONSERVATIVE (OLD)", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_republican": "INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 168, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 166, "registered_not_positive": 168}, "n_stations_flagged": 168, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:02.250502", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.18, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.791, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.338, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.32, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.18, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 1868, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.791, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1868, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.681, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 1868, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.365, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.091, "year": 1868, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1868, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1868, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.338, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.338, "year": 1868, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.32, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.32, "year": 1868, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1868, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1868, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1868, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1868, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 168}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "29ed860feb6d4426b77b13f4a65b405e", "name": "US 1866 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 120)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1866, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1866 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (120 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative_old": "CONSERVATIVE (OLD)", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_union_republican": "UNION REPUBLICAN", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 120, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 120, "registered_not_positive": 120}, "n_stations_flagged": 120, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:01.267182", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.162, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.797, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.336, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.32, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.162, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 1866, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.797, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.689, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.368, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.092, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.336, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.336, "year": 1866, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.32, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.32, "year": 1866, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1866, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1866, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1866, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 120}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "477046268a05457f92f591cd3e38a603", "name": "US 1864 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 125)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1864, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1864 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (125 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservative_old": "CONSERVATIVE (OLD)", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_radical_republican": "INDEPENDENT RADICAL REPUBLICAN", "votes_irregular_union": "IRREGULAR UNION", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_mozart_democrat": "MOZART DEMOCRAT", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_tammany_democrat": "TAMMANY DEMOCRAT", "votes_union_civil_war": "UNION (CIVIL WAR)", "votes_union_republican": "UNION REPUBLICAN", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 125, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 125, "cast_gt_registered": 125}, "n_stations_flagged": 125, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:45:00.260969", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.174, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.357, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.337, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.301, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.174, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 1864, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.339, "year": 1864, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1864, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.359, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.09, "year": 1864, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1864, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1864, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.337, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.337, "year": 1864, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.301, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.301, "year": 1864, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 1864, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1864, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1864, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1864, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 125}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9e1993e92ed445b08bd8a0afe21d0dee", "name": "US 1862 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 119)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1862, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1862 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (119 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_emancipation": "EMANCIPATION", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_southern_rights_democrat": "SOUTHERN RIGHTS DEMOCRAT", "votes_union_civil_war": "UNION (CIVIL WAR)", "votes_union_republican": "UNION REPUBLICAN", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 119, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 117, "registered_not_positive": 119}, "n_stations_flagged": 119, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:59.172289", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.185, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.792, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.337, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.3, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.185, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 1862, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.792, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1862, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.68, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 1862, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.355, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.089, "year": 1862, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1862, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1862, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.337, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.337, "year": 1862, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.3, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.3, "year": 1862, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 1862, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1862, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1862, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1862, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 119}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "54b98d4200c24e0c8f914ba5d2335d44", "name": "US 1860 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 137)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1860, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1860 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (137 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_know_nothing": "AMERICAN (KNOW NOTHING)", "votes_breckinridge_democrat": "BRECKINRIDGE DEMOCRAT", "votes_constitutional_union": "CONSTITUTIONAL UNION", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_fusion": "FUSION", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_opposition": "OPPOSITION", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_state_s_rights_democrat": "STATE'S RIGHTS DEMOCRAT", "votes_union_civil_war": "UNION (CIVIL WAR)", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 137, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 131, "registered_not_positive": 137}, "n_stations_flagged": 137, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:58.098924", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.18, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.777, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.328, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.296, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.18, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 1860, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.777, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1860, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.656, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 1860, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.354, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.088, "year": 1860, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1860, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1860, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.328, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 1860, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.296, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.296, "year": 1860, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.629, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.629, "year": 1860, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1860, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1860, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1860, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 137}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "24001bd33f73445d8f427e37aeef25fe", "name": "US 1858 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 138)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1858, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1858 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (138 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_know_nothing": "AMERICAN (KNOW NOTHING)", "votes_anti_administration_democrat": "ANTI ADMINISTRATION DEMOCRAT", "votes_anti_lecompton_democrat": "ANTI-LECOMPTON DEMOCRAT", "votes_anti_tax": "ANTI-TAX", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_people_s": "PEOPLE'S", "votes_state_s_rights_democrat": "STATE'S RIGHTS DEMOCRAT", "votes_union_civil_war": "UNION (CIVIL WAR)", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 138, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 138, "cast_gt_registered": 132}, "n_stations_flagged": 138, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:56.928345", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.194, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.793, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.327, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.293, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.194, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 1858, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.793, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.356, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.089, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.327, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.327, "year": 1858, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.293, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.293, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 1858, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1858, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1858, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 138}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "28e0bc6593ab4e448a8e83da229afd98", "name": "US 1856 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 131)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1856, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1856 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (131 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_know_nothing": "AMERICAN (KNOW NOTHING)", "votes_benton_democrat": "BENTON DEMOCRAT", "votes_coalition": "COALITION", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_fusion": "FUSION", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_independent_american_know_nothing": "INDEPENDENT AMERICAN (KNOW NOTHING)", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_state_s_rights_democrat": "STATE'S RIGHTS DEMOCRAT", "votes_union_civil_war": "UNION (CIVIL WAR)", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 131, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 126, "registered_not_positive": 131}, "n_stations_flagged": 131, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:54.795959", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.193, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.788, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.327, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.293, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.193, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 1856, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.788, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1856, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.67, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1856, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.354, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.088, "year": 1856, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1856, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1856, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.327, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.327, "year": 1856, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.293, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.293, "year": 1856, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 1856, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1856, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1856, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1856, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 131}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0e92516b9fbf4c988d11df49a8e42aae", "name": "US 1854 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 139)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1854, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1854 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (139 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_know_nothing": "AMERICAN (KNOW NOTHING)", "votes_anti_benton_democrat": "ANTI-BENTON DEMOCRAT", "votes_anti_broderick_democrat": "ANTI-BRODERICK DEMOCRAT", "votes_anti_nebraska_democrat": "ANTI-NEBRASKA DEMOCRAT", "votes_benton_democrat": "BENTON DEMOCRAT", "votes_broderick_democrat": "BRODERICK DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_free_soil": "FREE SOIL", "votes_free_soil_democrat": "FREE SOIL DEMOCRAT", "votes_hard_democrat": "HARD DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_hard_democrat": "INDEPENDENT HARD DEMOCRAT", "votes_modern_republican": "MODERN REPUBLICAN", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_soft_democrat": "SOFT DEMOCRAT", "votes_state_s_rights_democrat": "STATE'S RIGHTS DEMOCRAT", "votes_temperance": "TEMPERANCE", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_whig": "WHIG"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 139, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 139, "cast_gt_registered": 133}, "n_stations_flagged": 139, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:53.660302", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.153, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.783, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.33, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.294, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.153, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 1854, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.679, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.33, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 1854, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.294, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.294, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 1854, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1854, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1854, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 139}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8dfeca2161ca4b48b11975f2ec116fc6", "name": "US 1852 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 119)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1852, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1852 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (119 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_know_nothing": "AMERICAN (KNOW NOTHING)", "votes_anti_benton_democrat": "ANTI-BENTON DEMOCRAT", "votes_benton_democrat": "BENTON DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_free_soil": "FREE SOIL", "votes_independent_democrat": "INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent_whig": "INDEPENDENT WHIG", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_ultra_abolitionist": "ULTRA ABOLITIONIST", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_whig": "WHIG"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 119, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 119, "cast_gt_registered": 118}, "n_stations_flagged": 119, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:52.654989", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.184, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.79, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.331, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.294, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.184, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 1852, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.79, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.66, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.361, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.09, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1852, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.294, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.294, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 1852, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1852, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 119}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b5c2b97fbcdc46c69430aa956ddb6444", "name": "US 1850 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 110)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1850, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1850 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (110 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_abolition": "ABOLITION", "votes_american_know_nothing": "AMERICAN (KNOW NOTHING)", "votes_anti_benton_democrat": "ANTI-BENTON DEMOCRAT", "votes_benton_democrat": "BENTON DEMOCRAT", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_free_soil": "FREE SOIL", "votes_national_reform": "NATIONAL REFORM", "votes_opposition": "OPPOSITION", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_protestant": "PROTESTANT", "votes_temperance": "TEMPERANCE", "votes_unknown": "Unknown", "votes_whig": "WHIG"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 110, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 110, "cast_gt_registered": 104}, "n_stations_flagged": 110, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:51.712561", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.171, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.797, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.33, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.293, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.171, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 1850, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.797, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1850, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.675, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 1850, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.353, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.088, "year": 1850, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1850, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1850, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.33, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 1850, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.293, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.293, "year": 1850, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 1850, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1850, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1850, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1850, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 110}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e70b982ed4394a2ea537e239742e1602", "name": "US 1844 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 106)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1844, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1844 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (106 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_american_know_nothing": "AMERICAN (KNOW NOTHING)", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_liberty": "LIBERTY", "votes_opposition_democrat": "OPPOSITION DEMOCRAT", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_state_rights_democrat": "STATE RIGHTS DEMOCRAT", "votes_whig": "WHIG"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 106, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 106, "cast_gt_registered": 69}, "n_stations_flagged": 106, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:50.803995", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.163, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.791, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.342, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.299, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.163, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 1844, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.791, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1844, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.66, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 1844, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.202, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.3, "year": 1844, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1844, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1844, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.342, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.342, "year": 1844, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.299, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.299, "year": 1844, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 1844, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1844, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1844, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1844, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 106}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ded2db808a494190bb0f42deff59acb6", "name": "US 1843 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 120)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1843, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1843 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (120 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anti_mason": "ANTI-MASON", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_irregular_whig": "IRREGULAR WHIG", "votes_law_and_order_whig": "LAW AND ORDER WHIG", "votes_liberty": "LIBERTY", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_redemption_democrat": "REDEMPTION DEMOCRAT", "votes_state_rights_democrat": "STATE RIGHTS DEMOCRAT", "votes_whig": "WHIG"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 120, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 108, "registered_not_positive": 120}, "n_stations_flagged": 120, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:49.908549", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.169, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.793, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.343, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.299, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.169, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 1843, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.793, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1843, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.672, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 1843, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.183, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.296, "year": 1843, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1843, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1843, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.343, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.343, "year": 1843, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.299, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.299, "year": 1843, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 1843, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1843, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1843, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1843, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 120}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "50368c0d62c64ce09c7aa2d7b4f3fcf2", "name": "US 1838 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 101)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1838, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1838 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (101 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_nullifier": "NULLIFIER", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_state_rights_democrat": "STATE RIGHTS DEMOCRAT", "votes_state_rights_whig": "STATE RIGHTS WHIG", "votes_union_democrat": "UNION DEMOCRAT", "votes_whig": "WHIG"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 101, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 94, "registered_not_positive": 101}, "n_stations_flagged": 101, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:48.994625", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.775, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.796, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.368, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.313, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.775, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1838, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.796, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1838, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.731, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1838, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.197, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.299, "year": 1838, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1838, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1838, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.368, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 1838, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.313, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.313, "year": 1838, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 1838, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1838, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1838, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1838, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 101}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5d5e457284c3435f9702daed4832fcd8", "name": "US 1834 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 109)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 1834, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "US lower-house election 1834 (Missing data), CONSTITUENCY level (109 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anti_mason": "ANTI-MASON", "votes_democrat": "DEMOCRAT", "votes_independent": "INDEPENDENT", "votes_others": "OTHERS", "votes_state_rights": "STATE RIGHTS", "votes_union": "UNION", "votes_whig": "WHIG"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 109, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 106, "registered_not_positive": 109}, "n_stations_flagged": 109, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:48.118870", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.792, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.784, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.367, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.314, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.792, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1834, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1834, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1834, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.189, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.297, "year": 1834, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 1834, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 1834, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.367, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.367, "year": 1834, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.314, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.314, "year": 1834, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 1834, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1834, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.119, "year": 1834, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 1834, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 109}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7f530703929c4f53a76e64bc3d0be5f3", "name": "UK 1945 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 617)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1945, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1945 (July), CONSTITUENCY level (617 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_agriculturalists": "Agriculturalists", "votes_christian_pacifists": "Christian Pacifists", "votes_common_wealth_movement": "Common Wealth Movement", "votes_commonwealth_labour_party": "Commonwealth Labour Party", "votes_communist_party_of_great_britain": "Communist Party of Great Britain", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_democratic_party": "Democratic Party", "votes_independent_conservatives": "Independent Conservatives", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independent_labour_party": "Independent Labour Party", "votes_independent_liberals": "Independent Liberals", "votes_independent_nationals": "Independent Nationals", "votes_independent_progressives": "Independent Progressives", "votes_independent_unionists": "Independent Unionists", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_liverpool_protestant_party": "Liverpool Protestant Party", "votes_national_liberals": "National Liberals", "votes_nationalists": "Nationalists", "votes_nationals": "Nationals", "votes_northern_ireland_labour_party": "Northern Ireland Labour Party", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_socialist_party_of_great_britain": "Socialist Party of Great Britain", "votes_unionists": "Unionists"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 617, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 3, "cast_gt_registered": 24}, "n_stations_flagged": 27, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:45.912512", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.622, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.945, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.709, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.596, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.622, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 1945, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 1945, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 1945, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.316, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 1945, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.617, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 1945, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.595, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 1945, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.218, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.054, "year": 1945, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.709, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 1945, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.596, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.596, "year": 1945, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.458, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.458, "year": 1945, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 1945, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 1945, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.022, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.022, "year": 1945, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.795, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 1945, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 617}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d0989a2434ac430c870c14dc46e43bd0", "name": "UK 1935 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 596)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1935, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1935 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (596 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_agriculturalists": "Agriculturalists", "votes_christian_socialists": "Christian Socialists", "votes_communist_party_of_great_britain": "Communist Party of Great Britain", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_independent_conservatives": "Independent Conservatives", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independent_labour_party": "Independent Labour Party", "votes_independent_liberals": "Independent Liberals", "votes_independent_nationals": "Independent Nationals", "votes_independent_progressives": "Independent Progressives", "votes_independent_republicans": "Independent Republicans", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_liverpool_protestant_party": "Liverpool Protestant Party", "votes_national_labour": "National Labour", "votes_national_liberals": "National Liberals", "votes_nationalists": "Nationalists", "votes_nationals": "Nationals", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_social_credit_party_of_great_britain": "Social Credit Party of Great Britain", "votes_unionists": "Unionists"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 596, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 19, "registered_not_positive": 37}, "n_stations_flagged": 56, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:43.514749", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.626, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.947, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.725, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.612, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.626, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 1935, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.947, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1935, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1935, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.313, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 1935, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.617, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 1935, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.193, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 1935, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.222, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.056, "year": 1935, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.725, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.725, "year": 1935, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 1935, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.397, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.397, "year": 1935, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 1935, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1935, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.025, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.025, "year": 1935, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1935, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 596}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "78bdd9f349f4445ca71bcf2bc1e1b1b4", "name": "UK 1931 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 595)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1931, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1931 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (595 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_agriculturalists": "Agriculturalists", "votes_common_wealth_movement": "Common Wealth Movement", "votes_communist_party_of_great_britain": "Communist Party of Great Britain", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independent_labour_party": "Independent Labour Party", "votes_independent_liberals": "Independent Liberals", "votes_independent_nationals": "Independent Nationals", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_liverpool_protestant_party": "Liverpool Protestant Party", "votes_national_labour": "National Labour", "votes_national_liberals": "National Liberals", "votes_nationalists": "Nationalists", "votes_nationals": "Nationals", "votes_new_party": "New Party", "votes_northern_ireland_labour_party": "Northern Ireland Labour Party", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_scottish_prohibition_party": "Scottish Prohibition Party", "votes_unionists": "Unionists"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 595, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 60, "cast_gt_registered": 20}, "n_stations_flagged": 80, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:40.992010", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.633, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.946, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.719, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.607, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.633, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1931, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1931, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1931, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.301, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 1931, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.617, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 1931, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.193, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 1931, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.226, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.057, "year": 1931, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.719, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 1931, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 1931, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.393, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.393, "year": 1931, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 1931, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1931, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.025, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.025, "year": 1931, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1931, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 595}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cb9b9edaa6c84e30adeeee60a45e7c24", "name": "UK 1929 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 595)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1929, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1929 (May), CONSTITUENCY level (595 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_communist_party_of_great_britain": "Communist Party of Great Britain", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_independent_conservatives": "Independent Conservatives", "votes_independent_liberals": "Independent Liberals", "votes_independent_unionists": "Independent Unionists", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_nationalists": "Nationalists", "votes_plaid_cymru": "Plaid Cymru", "votes_scottish_national_party": "Scottish National Party", "votes_scottish_prohibition_party": "Scottish Prohibition Party", "votes_unionists": "Unionists"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 595, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 6, "cast_gt_registered": 23}, "n_stations_flagged": 29, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:38.484973", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.632, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.946, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.717, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.611, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.632, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1929, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1929, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1929, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.044, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 1929, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.617, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 1929, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.193, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 1929, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 1929, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1929, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.611, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.611, "year": 1929, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.376, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.376, "year": 1929, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 1929, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1929, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.025, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.025, "year": 1929, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 1929, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 595}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e0ea3de5ce6b4505a72862af545dfc82", "name": "UK 1924 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 595)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1924, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1924 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (595 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_communist_party_of_great_britain": "Communist Party of Great Britain", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_constitutionalists": "Constitutionalists", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independent_liberals": "Independent Liberals", "votes_independent_unionists": "Independent Unionists", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_nationalists": "Nationalists", "votes_northern_ireland_labour_party": "Northern Ireland Labour Party", "votes_scottish_prohibition_party": "Scottish Prohibition Party", "votes_sinn_f_in": "Sinn F\u00e9in", "votes_unionists": "Unionists"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 595, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 31, "cast_gt_registered": 17}, "n_stations_flagged": 48, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:36.179241", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.639, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.95, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.715, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.607, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 1924, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1924, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1924, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.059, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 1924, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.617, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 1924, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.193, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 1924, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.213, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.053, "year": 1924, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.715, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 1924, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 1924, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.37, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 1924, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 1924, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1924, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.025, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.025, "year": 1924, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 1924, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 595}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "55495bb7b47b4bd29088309fe31a9263", "name": "UK 1923 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 595)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1923, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1923 (December), CONSTITUENCY level (595 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_christian_pacifists": "Christian Pacifists", "votes_communist_party_of_great_britain": "Communist Party of Great Britain", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_constitutionalists": "Constitutionalists", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independent_liberals": "Independent Liberals", "votes_independent_unionists": "Independent Unionists", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_nationalists": "Nationalists", "votes_scottish_prohibition_party": "Scottish Prohibition Party", "votes_unionists": "Unionists"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 595, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 20, "registered_not_positive": 45}, "n_stations_flagged": 65, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:29.803107", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.639, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.95, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.717, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.607, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 1923, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1923, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1923, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.059, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 1923, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.617, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 1923, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.193, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 1923, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.213, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.053, "year": 1923, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1923, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 1923, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.37, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 1923, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 1923, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1923, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.025, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.025, "year": 1923, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 1923, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 595}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bcfb7baa83b049cd92845de9d56bdded", "name": "UK 1922 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 595)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1922, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1922 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (595 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_agriculturalists": "Agriculturalists", "votes_communist_party_of_great_britain": "Communist Party of Great Britain", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_constitutionalists": "Constitutionalists", "votes_independent_conservatives": "Independent Conservatives", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independent_liberals": "Independent Liberals", "votes_independent_nationalists": "Independent Nationalists", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_national_liberals": "National Liberals", "votes_nationalists": "Nationalists", "votes_scottish_prohibition_party": "Scottish Prohibition Party", "votes_unionists": "Unionists"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 595, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 25, "registered_not_positive": 52}, "n_stations_flagged": 77, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:27.553145", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.64, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.947, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.707, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.596, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.64, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.947, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.055, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 1922, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.617, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 1922, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.193, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 1922, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.223, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.056, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.707, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.707, "year": 1922, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.596, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.596, "year": 1922, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.358, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.358, "year": 1922, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 1922, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.025, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.025, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 1922, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 595}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b13671b2cab04f29aaeb93c4127c0f54", "name": "UK 1918 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 688)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1918, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1918 (December), CONSTITUENCY level (688 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_agriculturalists": "Agriculturalists", "votes_british_socialist_party": "British Socialist Party", "votes_christian_socialists": "Christian Socialists", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_conservatives_coalition": "Conservatives (Coalition)", "votes_highland_land_league": "Highland Land League", "votes_independent_conservatives": "Independent Conservatives", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independent_liberals": "Independent Liberals", "votes_independent_nationalists": "Independent Nationalists", "votes_independent_progressives": "Independent Progressives", "votes_independent_unionists": "Independent Unionists", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_labour_party_coalition": "Labour Party (Coalition)", "votes_labour_unionists": "Labour Unionists", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_liberals_coalition": "Liberals (Coalition)", "votes_national_democratic_and_labour_party": "National Democratic and Labour Party", "votes_national_democratic_and_la_2": "National Democratic and Labour Party (Coalition)", "votes_national_federation_of_discharged_an": "National Federation of Discharged and Demobilised Sailors an", "votes_national_party": "National Party", "votes_national_socialist_party": "National Socialist Party", "votes_nationalists": "Nationalists", "votes_scottish_prohibition_party": "Scottish Prohibition Party", "votes_sinn_f_in": "Sinn F\u00e9in", "votes_socialist_labour_party": "Socialist Labour Party", "votes_unionists": "Unionists", "votes_women_s_party": "Women's Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 688, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 17, "registered_not_positive": 79}, "n_stations_flagged": 96, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:25.046531", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.532, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.92, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.464, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.403, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.532, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.755, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 1918, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.295, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 1918, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1918, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.226, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.057, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 1918, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.403, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 1918, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.232, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.232, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.807, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 1918, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.026, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.786, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 1918, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 688}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "025d32e3d88a49878783cd23c8a74165", "name": "UK 1910 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 541)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1910, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1910 (January), CONSTITUENCY level (541 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_free_traders": "Free Traders", "votes_independent_conservatives": "Independent Conservatives", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independent_liberals": "Independent Liberals", "votes_independent_nationalists": "Independent Nationalists", "votes_independent_unionists": "Independent Unionists", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberal_unionists": "Liberal Unionists", "votes_liberal_labour_alliance": "Liberal/Labour alliance", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_nationalists": "Nationalists", "votes_scottish_prohibition_party": "Scottish Prohibition Party", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party", "votes_unionists": "Unionists"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 541, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 5, "cast_gt_registered": 65}, "n_stations_flagged": 70, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:22.517756", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.473, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.945, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.477, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.416, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.473, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.744, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 1910, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.295, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 1910, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1910, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 1910, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.416, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.416, "year": 1910, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.228, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.228, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 1910, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.026, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 1910, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 541}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b1195379da8b44c19dfbbe205f378bc9", "name": "UK 1910 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 643)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1910, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1910 (December), CONSTITUENCY level (643 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_independent_conservatives": "Independent Conservatives", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independent_liberals": "Independent Liberals", "votes_independent_nationalists": "Independent Nationalists", "votes_independent_unionists": "Independent Unionists", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberal_unionists": "Liberal Unionists", "votes_liberal_labour_alliance": "Liberal/Labour alliance", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_nationalists": "Nationalists", "votes_scottish_prohibition_party": "Scottish Prohibition Party", "votes_social_democratic_party": "Social Democratic Party", "votes_unionists": "Unionists"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 643, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 95, "cast_gt_registered": 30}, "n_stations_flagged": 125, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:19.934099", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.473, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.945, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.477, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.416, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.473, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.744, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 1910, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.295, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 1910, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1910, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.055, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 1910, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.416, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.416, "year": 1910, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.228, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.228, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 1910, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.026, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 1910, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 1910, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 643}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e7d2ed02eef94be79bf2a70a68b8edab", "name": "UK 1906 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 642)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1906, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1906 (January), CONSTITUENCY level (642 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_free_traders": "Free Traders", "votes_independent_conservatives": "Independent Conservatives", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independent_liberal_unionists": "Independent Liberal Unionists", "votes_independent_liberals": "Independent Liberals", "votes_independent_nationalists": "Independent Nationalists", "votes_independent_unionists": "Independent Unionists", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberal_unionists": "Liberal Unionists", "votes_liberal_labour_alliance": "Liberal/Labour alliance", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_nationalists": "Nationalists", "votes_scottish_workers_representation_comm": "Scottish Workers Representation Committee", "votes_social_democratic_federation": "Social Democratic Federation", "votes_unionists": "Unionists"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 642, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 31, "cast_gt_registered": 47}, "n_stations_flagged": 78, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:17.598672", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.476, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.477, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.415, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.476, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.713, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.678, "year": 1906, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.295, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 1906, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1906, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.236, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.059, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 1906, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.415, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 1906, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.225, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.225, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 1906, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.026, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 1906, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 642}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "666cca3160e546799dc8af8d15732c94", "name": "UK 1900 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 643)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1900, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1900 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (643 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_independent_conservatives": "Independent Conservatives", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independent_liberals": "Independent Liberals", "votes_independent_nationalists": "Independent Nationalists", "votes_independent_unionists": "Independent Unionists", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_labour_party": "Labour Party", "votes_liberal_unionists": "Liberal Unionists", "votes_liberal_labour_alliance": "Liberal/Labour alliance", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_nationalists": "Nationalists", "votes_scottish_workers_representation_comm": "Scottish Workers Representation Committee", "votes_unionists": "Unionists"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 643, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 165, "cast_gt_registered": 26}, "n_stations_flagged": 191, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:14.986685", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.469, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.94, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.471, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.412, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.469, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.814, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 1900, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.295, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 1900, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1900, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.226, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.057, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.471, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.471, "year": 1900, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.412, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 1900, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.217, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.217, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 1900, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.026, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 1900, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 643}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1e90da34cd9746e989a7c3d9866bac63", "name": "UK 1895 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 643)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1895, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1895 (July), CONSTITUENCY level (643 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anti_parnell_nationalists": "Anti-Parnell nationalists", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independent_labour_party": "Independent Labour Party", "votes_independent_liberals": "Independent Liberals", "votes_independent_nationalists": "Independent Nationalists", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_liberal_unionists": "Liberal Unionists", "votes_liberal_labour_alliance": "Liberal/Labour alliance", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_nationalists": "Nationalists", "votes_parnell_nationalists": "Parnell nationalists", "votes_social_democratic_federation": "Social Democratic Federation", "votes_unionists": "Unionists"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 643, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 124, "cast_gt_registered": 26}, "n_stations_flagged": 150, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:12.479712", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.482, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.747, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.459, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.399, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.482, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 1895, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.747, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 1895, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1895, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 1895, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.019, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 1895, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1895, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 1895, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.399, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.399, "year": 1895, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 1895, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1895, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.026, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 1895, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 1895, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 643}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0e0927794042442ea344202d9486d599", "name": "UK 1892 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 641)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1892, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1892 (July), CONSTITUENCY level (641 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anti_parnell_nationalists": "Anti-Parnell nationalists", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_independent_conservatives": "Independent Conservatives", "votes_independent_labour": "Independent Labour", "votes_independent_liberals": "Independent Liberals", "votes_independent_nationalists": "Independent Nationalists", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_liberal_unionists": "Liberal Unionists", "votes_liberal_labour_alliance": "Liberal/Labour alliance", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_nationalists": "Nationalists", "votes_parnell_nationalists": "Parnell nationalists", "votes_scottish_parliamentary_labour_party": "Scottish Parliamentary Labour Party", "votes_scottish_united_trades_councils_labo": "Scottish United Trades Councils Labour Party", "votes_social_democratic_federation": "Social Democratic Federation", "votes_unionists": "Unionists"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 641, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 40, "cast_gt_registered": 26}, "n_stations_flagged": 66, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:10.039201", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.469, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.748, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.448, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.393, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.469, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.748, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.791, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.698, "year": 1892, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.013, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 1892, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1892, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.448, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.448, "year": 1892, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.393, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.393, "year": 1892, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 1892, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.026, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 1892, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 1892, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 641}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "19d7aa1e052b4eb2afa55c3ed2782d7a", "name": "UK 1886 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 643)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1886, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1886 (July), CONSTITUENCY level (643 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_independent_liberal_unionists": "Independent Liberal Unionists", "votes_independent_liberals": "Independent Liberals", "votes_liberal_unionists": "Liberal Unionists", "votes_liberal_labour_alliance": "Liberal/Labour alliance", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_nationalists": "Nationalists", "votes_unionists": "Unionists"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 643, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 54, "registered_not_positive": 251}, "n_stations_flagged": 272, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:07.375467", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.458, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.732, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.437, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.386, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.458, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 1886, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.732, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1886, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.017, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 1886, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 1886, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.014, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 1886, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1886, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.437, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 1886, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.386, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.386, "year": 1886, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 1886, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1886, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.026, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 1886, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 1886, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 643}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0f5045186acb43bc9aa42b0bd32188b1", "name": "UK 1885 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 643)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1885, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1885 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (643 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_independent_conservatives": "Independent Conservatives", "votes_independent_liberal_labour": "Independent Liberal/Labour", "votes_independent_liberals": "Independent Liberals", "votes_independent_nationalists": "Independent Nationalists", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_liberal_labour_alliance": "Liberal/Labour alliance", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_loyalists": "Loyalists", "votes_nationalists": "Nationalists", "votes_scottish_land_restoration_league": "Scottish Land Restoration League", "votes_social_democratic_federation": "Social Democratic Federation"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 643, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 128, "registered_not_positive": 118}, "n_stations_flagged": 167, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:04.958069", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.458, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.732, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.413, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.37, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.458, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 1885, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.732, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1885, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.017, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 1885, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 1885, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.014, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 1885, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1885, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.413, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 1885, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.37, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 1885, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 1885, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1885, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.026, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 1885, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 1885, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 643}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "eba8cc6ce63443f5b041dc9d20f2b72e", "name": "UK 1880 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 416)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1880, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1880 (March), CONSTITUENCY level (416 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_home_rule_party": "Home Rule Party", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_liberal_labour_alliance": "Liberal/Labour alliance", "votes_liberals": "Liberals"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 416, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 215}, "n_stations_flagged": 215, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:03.148391", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.711, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.741, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.373, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.339, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.678, "year": 1880, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1880, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 1880, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.465, "year": 1880, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.052, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.513, "year": 1880, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1880, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 1880, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.339, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.339, "year": 1880, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.818, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 1880, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1880, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.039, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.039, "year": 1880, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 1880, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 416}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1cfe67922da94df1801841c1e2a0a3b4", "name": "UK 1874 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 416)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1874, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1874 (January), CONSTITUENCY level (416 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_home_rule_party": "Home Rule Party", "votes_independent_nationalists": "Independent Nationalists", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_liberal_labour_alliance": "Liberal/Labour alliance", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 416, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 195}, "n_stations_flagged": 195, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:44:00.653647", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.752, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.746, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.365, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.33, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.752, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 1874, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.746, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.003, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 1874, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.225, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.988, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.497, "year": 1874, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1874, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.365, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.365, "year": 1874, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.33, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 1874, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.795, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 1874, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.039, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.039, "year": 1874, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 1874, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 416}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e66fae5235b640cbb2a22ebfdaf5ad71", "name": "UK 1868 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 420)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1868, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1868 (November), CONSTITUENCY level (420 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_independent_nationalists": "Independent Nationalists", "votes_independents": "Independents", "votes_liberal_labour_alliance": "Liberal/Labour alliance", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 420, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 190}, "n_stations_flagged": 190, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:43:58.823309", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.713, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.741, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.348, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.318, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.713, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.678, "year": 1868, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1868, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.003, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 1868, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.235, "year": 1868, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.037, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.509, "year": 1868, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1868, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.348, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.348, "year": 1868, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.318, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 1868, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 1868, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1868, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.175, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.175, "year": 1868, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.809, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 1868, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 420}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "acf4df8e75404f04b544306effd08632", "name": "UK 1865 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 400)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1865, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1865 (July), CONSTITUENCY level (400 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_liberals": "Liberals"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 400, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 159}, "n_stations_flagged": 159, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:43:57.118971", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.731, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.327, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.305, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 1865, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.731, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1865, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.019, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 1865, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.233, "year": 1865, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.009, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.502, "year": 1865, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1865, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.327, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.327, "year": 1865, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.305, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.305, "year": 1865, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 1865, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1865, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.175, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.175, "year": 1865, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.809, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 1865, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 400}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f8f6abae028b498ca606bc7bfc1b2a0a", "name": "UK 1859 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 399)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1859, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1859 (April), CONSTITUENCY level (399 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_chartists": "Chartists", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_liberals": "Liberals"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 399, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 128}, "n_stations_flagged": 128, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:43:55.472288", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.749, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.741, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.321, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.296, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.749, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 1859, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1859, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.99, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.748, "year": 1859, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.233, "year": 1859, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.033, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.508, "year": 1859, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1859, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.321, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.321, "year": 1859, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.296, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.296, "year": 1859, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 1859, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1859, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.175, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.175, "year": 1859, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.809, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 1859, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 399}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "acc94b09a4a9458a85d4cc9d48c3fe39", "name": "UK 1857 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 399)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1857, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1857 (March), CONSTITUENCY level (399 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_chartists": "Chartists", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_irish_independent_opposition": "Irish independent opposition", "votes_liberals": "Liberals"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 399, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 156}, "n_stations_flagged": 156, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:43:53.781280", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.744, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.75, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.32, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.295, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.744, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.436, "year": 1857, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 1857, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 1857, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.234, "year": 1857, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.979, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.495, "year": 1857, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1857, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.32, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.32, "year": 1857, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.295, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 1857, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 1857, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1857, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.175, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.175, "year": 1857, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.809, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 1857, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 399}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d03dfe2f0d5a440f9bc6c5060fccfc08", "name": "UK 1852 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 399)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1852, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1852 (July), CONSTITUENCY level (399 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_chartists": "Chartists", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_peelites": "Peelites"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 399, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 171}, "n_stations_flagged": 171, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:43:52.094492", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.726, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.322, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.296, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.436, "year": 1852, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.726, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.992, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.748, "year": 1852, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.235, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.032, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.508, "year": 1852, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1852, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.322, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.322, "year": 1852, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.296, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.296, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 1852, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1852, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.175, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.175, "year": 1852, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.809, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 1852, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 399}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "71ce47477b3549cc845a36506fd6cc27", "name": "UK 1847 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 400)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1847, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1847 (July), CONSTITUENCY level (400 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_chartists": "Chartists", "votes_confederates": "Confederates", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_peelites": "Peelites", "votes_repealers": "Repealers", "votes_unknown": "Unknown"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 400, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 129}, "n_stations_flagged": 129, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:43:50.093389", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.75, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.742, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.317, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.294, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 1847, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.742, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1847, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.008, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 1847, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.237, "year": 1847, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.053, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.513, "year": 1847, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1847, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.317, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.317, "year": 1847, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.294, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.294, "year": 1847, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 1847, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1847, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.245, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.245, "year": 1847, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.78, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 1847, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 400}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a50ee49158fd4816a51771451d5a4894", "name": "UK 1841 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 401)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1841, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1841 (June), CONSTITUENCY level (401 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_chartists": "Chartists", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_repealers": "Repealers"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 401, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 133}, "n_stations_flagged": 133, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:43:48.355920", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.751, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.755, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.318, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.292, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.751, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 1841, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.755, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1841, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 1841, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.23, "year": 1841, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.04, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.51, "year": 1841, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1841, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.318, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 1841, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.292, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 1841, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 1841, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1841, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.245, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.245, "year": 1841, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.78, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 1841, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 401}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3948310bb55d43a9a69b033e57770477", "name": "UK 1837 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 401)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1837, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1837 (July), CONSTITUENCY level (401 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_chartists": "Chartists", "votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_liberals": "Liberals"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 401, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 180}, "n_stations_flagged": 180, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:43:46.581982", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.739, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.743, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.305, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.285, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.739, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.435, "year": 1837, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1837, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.01, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 1837, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.238, "year": 1837, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.026, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 1837, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1837, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.305, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.305, "year": 1837, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.285, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.285, "year": 1837, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 1837, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1837, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.245, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.245, "year": 1837, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.72, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.72, "year": 1837, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 401}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "612c11f3959b428b84fdbf242373f224", "name": "UK 1835 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 401)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1835, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1835 (December), CONSTITUENCY level (401 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_liberals": "Liberals"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 401, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 164}, "n_stations_flagged": 164, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:43:44.936200", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.736, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.738, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.306, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.285, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1835, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1835, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.977, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 1835, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.233, "year": 1835, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.078, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.519, "year": 1835, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1835, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.306, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 1835, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.285, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.285, "year": 1835, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 1835, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1835, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.245, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.245, "year": 1835, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.72, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.72, "year": 1835, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 401}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4dc626c0ce5349ce8bbc0d71fdf70f05", "name": "UK 1832 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 401)", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 1832, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UK lower-house election 1832 (December), CONSTITUENCY level (401 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_conservatives": "Conservatives", "votes_liberals": "Liberals", "votes_repealers": "Repealers"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 401, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 223}, "n_stations_flagged": 223, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:43:43.096421", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.759, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.741, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.293, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.265, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.759, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 1832, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1832, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.005, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 1832, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.231, "year": 1832, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.029, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 1832, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 1832, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.293, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.293, "year": 1832, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.265, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.265, "year": 1832, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.634, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.634, "year": 1832, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 1832, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.345, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.345, "year": 1832, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.72, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.72, "year": 1832, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 401}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6d0bdbadab2b40f099ca166544bf3ce6", "name": "Norway 1918 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 126)", "metadata": {"country": "Norway", "year": 1918, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Norway lower-house election 1918 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (126 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_arbeiderdemokraterne": "Arbeiderdemokraterne", "votes_det_norske_arbeiderparti": "Det norske arbeiderparti", "votes_h_ire": "H\u00f8ire", "votes_landmandsforbundet": "Landmandsforbundet", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 126, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:43:42.136451", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.832, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.889, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.704, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.632, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.176, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 1918, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.757, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 1918, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.799, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.45, "year": 1918, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 1918, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.632, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 1918, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.538, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 1918, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 1918, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.928, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.025, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.025, "year": 1918, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 1918, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 126}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "258bda8374bc401390dc15d294cb2de7", "name": "Norway 1915 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 123)", "metadata": {"country": "Norway", "year": 1915, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Norway lower-house election 1915 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (123 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_arbeiderdemokraterne": "Arbeiderdemokraterne", "votes_det_norske_arbeiderparti": "Det norske arbeiderparti", "votes_h_ire": "H\u00f8ire", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 123, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:43:41.105843", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.777, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.829, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.702, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.627, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.777, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1915, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 1915, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.791, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1915, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.292, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 1915, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.757, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1915, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 1915, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.446, "year": 1915, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.702, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 1915, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.627, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.627, "year": 1915, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.533, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.533, "year": 1915, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 1915, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.928, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 1915, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.025, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.025, "year": 1915, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 1915, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 123}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c16fa9ac38ad4f2da7b8a608b0d0fa73", "name": "Norway 1912 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 123)", "metadata": {"country": "Norway", "year": 1912, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Norway lower-house election 1912 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (123 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_det_norske_arbeiderparti": "Det norske arbeiderparti", "votes_h_ire": "H\u00f8ire", "votes_l_ad": "L-AD", "votes_others": "Others"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 123, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 7, "cast_gt_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:43:36.247683", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.826, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.888, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.535, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.489, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.826, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 1912, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1912, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.553, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 1912, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.167, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 1912, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.757, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1912, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 1912, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.446, "year": 1912, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 1912, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.489, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.489, "year": 1912, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.398, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.398, "year": 1912, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 1912, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.928, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 1912, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.025, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.025, "year": 1912, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.758, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.758, "year": 1912, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 123}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e370b8687ed84e02803be11d58aa7c39", "name": "Norway 1909 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 123)", "metadata": {"country": "Norway", "year": 1909, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Norway lower-house election 1909 (October), CONSTITUENCY level (123 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_arbeiderdemokraterne": "Arbeiderdemokraterne", "votes_det_norske_arbeiderparti": "Det norske arbeiderparti", "votes_h_ire": "H\u00f8ire", "votes_l_ad": "L-AD", "votes_others": "Others"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 123, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:43:35.311744", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.828, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.887, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.531, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.486, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.828, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 1909, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1909, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 1909, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 1909, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.757, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1909, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 1909, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.793, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.448, "year": 1909, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.531, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.531, "year": 1909, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.486, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.486, "year": 1909, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.393, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.393, "year": 1909, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 1909, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.928, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 1909, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.025, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.025, "year": 1909, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.744, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 1909, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 123}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e3171f006db94a169bc0367fc7ac1736", "name": "Norway 1906 \u2014 Lower house (CLEA constituency-level, 123)", "metadata": {"country": "Norway", "year": 1906, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Norway lower-house election 1906 (August), CONSTITUENCY level (123 constituencies) \u2014 the granularity at which historical results survive. Source: CLEA (Constituency-Level Elections Archive) release clea_20110914, via Wayback Machine (electiondataarchive.org is Cloudflare-gated). registered=pev1, cast=vot1, valid=vv1 (else \u03a3party), invalid=ivv1; party votes=pv1 pivoted (top-30 + Other).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_arbeiderdemokraterne": "Arbeiderdemokraterne", "votes_det_norske_arbeiderparti": "Det norske arbeiderparti", "votes_others": "Others", "votes_samlingspartiet": "Samlingspartiet", "votes_venstre": "Venstre"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 123, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 14}, "n_stations_flagged": 14, "created_at": "2026-06-09T23:43:34.346488", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.834, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.886, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.53, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.485, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.55, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 1906, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.757, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 1906, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.769, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 1906, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.53, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.53, "year": 1906, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.485, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 1906, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.392, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 1906, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.928, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.025, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.025, "year": 1906, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.744, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 1906, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 123}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dbaab32e7fbc4974a4bd9e36b5524e45", "name": "Moldova 2025 \u2014 Parliamentary per-section (PAS v pro-Russia)", "metadata": {"country": "Moldova", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Moldova parliamentary election, 28 Sep 2025. PAS (Sandu) vs pro-Russia Patriotic Bloc. Per polling station, 2,273 stations across 37 circumscriptions (incl. diaspora 'peste hotare'). registered=a)+b) (main+supplementary lists), cast=d), valid=h), invalid=f). Source: CEC API rezultate.cec.md GetReport per circ/region/station (SSRS HTML); party columns keyed by uniform national ballot number.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_p01": "Blocul Electoral \u201eALTERNATIVA\u201d", "votes_p02": "Blocul Electoral \u201ePatriotic al Sociali\u0219tilor, Comuni\u015ftilor, Inima \u0219i Viitorul Moldovei\u201d", "votes_p03": "Blocul Electoral \u201e\u00ceMPREUN\u0102\u201d", "votes_p04": "Blocul electoral \u201eBlocul Unirea Na\u021biunii\u201d", "votes_p05": "Candidat independent ANDREI N\u0102STASE", "votes_p06": "Candidat independent OLESEA STAMATE", "votes_p07": "Candidat independent TATIANA CRE\u0162U", "votes_p08": "Candidat independent VICTORIA SANDU\u0162A", "votes_p09": "Partidul Liberal", "votes_p10": "Partidul Politic ALIAN\u021aA PENTRU UNIREA ROM\u00c2NILOR", "votes_p11": "Partidul Politic Alian\u021ba Liberalilor \u0219i Democra\u021bilor pentru Europa", "votes_p12": "Partidul Politic Alian\u021ba \u201eMOLDOVENII\u201d", "votes_p13": "Partidul Politic Coali\u0163ia pentru Unitate \u015fi Bun\u0103stare", "votes_p14": "Partidul Politic Liga Ora\u015felor \u015fi Comunelor", "votes_p15": "Partidul Politic MI\u015eCAREA RESPECT MOLDOVA", "votes_p16": "Partidul Politic NOUA OP\u021aIUNE ISTORIC\u0102", "votes_p17": "Partidul Politic Partidul Social Democrat European", "votes_p18": "Partidul Politic \u201eDemocra\u0163ia Acas\u0103\u201d", "votes_p19": "Partidul Politic \u201eMOLDOVA MARE\u201d", "votes_p20": "Partidul Politic \u201ePartidul Ac\u021biune \u0219i Solidaritate\u201d", "votes_p21": "Partidul Politic \u201ePartidul Nostru\u201d", "votes_p22": "Partidul Politic \u201eUniunea Cre\u0219tin-Social\u0103 din Moldova\u201d", "votes_p23": "Partidul politic Partidul Na\u0163ional Moldovenesc"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2273, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-08T13:15:54.088082", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.233, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.056, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.553, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.449, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.233, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.056, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.274, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.48, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.62, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.425, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.187, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.388, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.553, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.449, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.44, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.325, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.325, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.652, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2273}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7402ced1777c4497ae6900970af5426e", "name": "Costa Rica 2026 \u2014 Presidential per-JRV (NEW country)", "metadata": {"country": "Costa Rica", "year": 2026, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Costa Rica general election, presidential, 1 Feb 2026. Laura Fern\u00e1ndez (Pueblo Soberano) won R1 outright (~50.2%, above 40% threshold); \u00c1lvaro Ramos (PLN) ~32.1%. TSE FINAL escrutinio (manual count). 7,153 juntas receptoras de votos (JRV). valid=VOTOS VALIDOS, invalid=VOTOS NULOS+EN BLANCO, cast=TOTAL VOTOS RECIBIDOS, registered=TOTAL GENERAL (papeletas = electors assigned = cast+sobrantes). No per-JRV province/canton in the acta (region omitted). Final escrutinio supersedes provisional snapshot", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_alianza_costa_rica_primero": "Alianza Costa Rica Primero", "votes_aqui_costa_rica_manda": "Aqui Costa Rica Manda", "votes_avanza": "Avanza", "votes_centro_democratico_y_social": "Centro Democratico Y Social", "votes_coalicion_agenda_ciudadana": "Coalicion Agenda Ciudadana", "votes_de_la_clase_trabajadora": "De La Clase Trabajadora", "votes_esperanza_nacional": "Esperanza Nacional", "votes_esperanza_y_libertad": "Esperanza Y Libertad", "votes_frente_amplio": "Frente Amplio", "votes_integracion_nacional": "Integracion Nacional", "votes_justicia_social_costarricense": "Justicia Social Costarricense", "votes_liberacion_nacional": "Liberacion Nacional", "votes_liberal_progresista": "Liberal Progresista", "votes_nueva_generacion": "Nueva Generacion", "votes_nueva_republica": "Nueva Republica", "votes_progreso_social_democratico": "Progreso Social Democratico", "votes_pueblo_soberano": "Pueblo Soberano", "votes_unidad_social_cristiana": "Unidad Social Cristiana", "votes_unidos_podemos": "Unidos Podemos", "votes_union_costarricense_democratica": "Union Costarricense Democratica"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7153, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-06T22:05:45.963642", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.845, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.936, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.862, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.809, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.944, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.809, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.206, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.206, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7153}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "737b6be839a041e4999bbd11ac0b0b29", "name": "Hungary 2026 OGY (Parliamentary, party-list, szavaz\u00f3k\u00f6r)", "metadata": {"country": "Hungary", "year": 2026, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Hungarian 2026 parliamentary election (12 Apr 2026). HISTORIC: P\u00e9ter Magyar's Tisza Party won the party-list tier (~53.6%) and a majority, unseating Orb\u00e1n's Fidesz-KDNP (~37.8%) after 16 years; record turnout 79.6%. Party-list (orsz\u00e1gos lista) tier \u2014 cleanest forensic input. Coverage: 10,022 szavaz\u00f3k\u00f6r across 19 counties + Budapest. valid = \u03a3(5 national lists: MKKP, Tisza, Mi Haz\u00e1nk, DK, Fidesz-KDNP); cast=JL, registered=EL/AL, invalid=M (nationality-ballot voters are in cast but counted on a se", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_mkkp": "MKKP \u2013 Two-Tailed Dog Party", "votes_tisza": "Tisza Party (P\u00e9ter Magyar)", "votes_mi_hazank": "Mi Haz\u00e1nk Mozgalom (Our Homeland)", "votes_dk": "Demokratikus Koal\u00edci\u00f3 (DK)", "votes_fidesz_kdnp": "Fidesz-KDNP (Orb\u00e1n)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10022, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 6465}, "n_stations_flagged": 6465, "created_at": "2026-06-06T21:52:30.017376", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.355, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.757, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.421, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.315, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.355, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.589, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.757, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.186, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.546, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.139, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.287, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.348, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.087, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.421, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.315, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.315, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.296, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.296, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.678, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.678, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.488, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.493, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.493, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10022}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "348038fc6f574e0595dca468bc1e4855", "name": "Croatia 2024 \u2014 Presidential R2 per-BM (6.7K)", "metadata": {"country": "Croatia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Croatia presidential election round 2 (12 Jan 2025), per polling station (bira\u010dko mjesto), 6,755 BM. Zoran Milanovi\u0107 re-elected (R2 74.7% vs Primorac 25.3%). cast=Glasovalo bira\u010da, valid=Va\u017ee\u0107i, invalid=Neva\u017ee\u0107i. Source: izbori.hr/arhiva-izbora/data/predsjednik/2024/zip/rezultati.zip (via data.gov.hr CKAN url pattern).", "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_zoran_milanovi": "Zoran Milanovi\u0107", "votes_dragan_primorac": "Dragan Primorac"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6755, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 250}, "n_stations_flagged": 250, "created_at": "2026-06-06T21:41:49.274575", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.765, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.925, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.71, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.607, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.925, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.66, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.175, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.106, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.453, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.613, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.556, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.556, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.254, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.254, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6755}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "60f17d1b2f5f48f6bbee5b26b0ae89dd", "name": "Croatia 2024 \u2014 Presidential R1 per-BM (6.7K)", "metadata": {"country": "Croatia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Croatia presidential election round 1 (29 Dec 2024), per polling station (bira\u010dko mjesto), 6,755 BM. Zoran Milanovi\u0107 re-elected (R2 74.7% vs Primorac 25.3%). cast=Glasovalo bira\u010da, valid=Va\u017ee\u0107i, invalid=Neva\u017ee\u0107i. Source: izbori.hr/arhiva-izbora/data/predsjednik/2024/zip/rezultati.zip (via data.gov.hr CKAN url pattern).", "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_miro_bulj": "Miro Bulj", "votes_tomislav_jonji": "Tomislav Jonji\u0107", "votes_ivana_kekin": "Ivana Kekin", "votes_branka_lozo": "Branka Lozo", "votes_zoran_milanovi": "Zoran Milanovi\u0107", "votes_dragan_primorac": "Dragan Primorac", "votes_marija_selak_raspudi": "Marija Selak Raspudi\u0107", "votes_niko_toki_kartelo": "Niko Toki\u0107 Kartelo"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6755, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 266}, "n_stations_flagged": 266, "created_at": "2026-06-06T21:41:26.172572", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.765, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.925, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.71, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.607, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.925, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.66, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.175, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.106, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.453, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.613, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.556, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.556, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.254, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.254, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6755}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9e6f1558b6244309aee8dba244669eeb", "name": "Ecuador 2025 \u2014 Presidential R1 per-parish (1.3K)", "metadata": {"country": "Ecuador", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ecuador general election, presidential first round, 9 Feb 2025. Near-tie: Noboa ~44.2% vs Gonz\u00e1lez ~44.0% -> 13 Apr runoff (Noboa won 55.9%). 16 candidates. Parish (parroquia) level \u2014 the finest the CNE portal publishes (1,303 parishes). cast=Sufragantes, registered=Sufragantes+Ausentismo, valid=\u03a3cand, invalid=Blancos+Nulos. Source: github.com/Juanmanuelph21/ecuador2025-scraping-analisis (Selenium scrape of resultados2025.cne.gob.ec; CNE is WAF-403 to curl).", "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_andrea_gonzalez": "Andrea Gonz\u00e1lez (SUMA)", "votes_carlos_rabascall": "Carlos Rabascall (ID)", "votes_daniel_noboa_azin": "Daniel Noboa (ADN)", "votes_enrique_gomez": "Enrique G\u00f3mez (SC)", "votes_francesco_tabacchi": "Francesco Tabacchi (CREO)", "votes_henry_cucalon": "Henry Cucal\u00f3n (Construye)", "votes_henry_kronfle_kozhaya": "Henry Kronfle (PSC)", "votes_ivan_saquicela": "Iv\u00e1n Saquicela (Democracia S\u00ed)", "votes_jimmy_jairala_vallazza": "Jimmy Jairala (Centro Democr\u00e1tico)", "votes_jorge_escala": "Jorge Escala (Unidad Popular)", "votes_juan_ivan_cueva": "Juan Iv\u00e1n Cueva (Amigo)", "votes_leonidas_iza": "Le\u00f3nidas Iza (Pachakutik)", "votes_luis_felipe_tilleria": "Luis Tiller\u00eda (Avanza)", "votes_luisa_gonzalez": "Luisa Gonz\u00e1lez (RC)", "votes_pedro_granja": "Pedro Granja (PSE)", "votes_victor_araus": "V\u00edctor Araus (PSP)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1303, "granularity": "parish", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 812, "registered_not_positive": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 814, "created_at": "2026-06-06T21:34:54.301264", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.345, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.942, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.607, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.386, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.345, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.798, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.989, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.747, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.403, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.798, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.45, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.386, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.386, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.268, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.268, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.692, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.487, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.487, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.652, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.706, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1303}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dcce2034a16d45fb8352cb70074e7426", "name": "South Korea 2025 \u2014 21st Presidential (booth-level)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "21st presidential election, 3 June 2025 \u2014 snap election after the Constitutional Court removed Yoon Suk Yeol (4 Apr 2025). Lee Jae-myung (Democratic Party) won 49.4%; turnout 79.4% (highest since 1997). Coverage: 18,608 counting units (\ud22c\ud45c\uad6c booths + \uad00\ub0b4\uc0ac\uc804\ud22c\ud45c in-precinct early vote + district \uac70\uc18c\u00b7\uc120\uc0c1/\uad00\uc678\uc0ac\uc804/\uc7ac\uc678 specials), which partition the electorate exactly (QC sum registered 44,391,871 == national 44,391,871). Source: data.nec.go.kr open-data attachFileId=66 (NEC official XLSX, polling-station level)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_lee_jaemyung": "Lee Jae-myung (Democratic Party)", "votes_kim_moonsoo": "Kim Moon-soo (People Power Party)", "votes_lee_junseok": "Lee Jun-seok (Reform Party)", "votes_kwon_youngguk": "Kwon Young-guk (Democratic Labor Party)", "votes_song_jinho": "Song Jin-ho (Independent)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18608, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-06-06T21:26:26.757334", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.89, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.819, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.739, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.837, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.707, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.585, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.159, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.04, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.739, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.872, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.156, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.156, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18608}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "90623ae7b02f4c1f9cd887c357c28548", "name": "Mexico 2024 \u2014 Senate RP (proportional)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "INE Datos Abiertos.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "NOMBRE_ESTADO", "sub_region_col": "MUNICIPIO", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PAN": "PAN", "PRI": "PRI", "PRD": "PRD", "PVEM": "PVEM", "PT": "PT", "MC": "MC", "MORENA": "MORENA", "PAN_PRI_PRD": "PAN_PRI_PRD", "PAN_PRI": "PAN_PRI", "PAN_PRD": "PAN_PRD", "PRI_PRD": "PRI_PRD", "PVEM_PT_MORENA": "PVEM_PT_MORENA", "PVEM_PT": "PVEM_PT", "PVEM_MORENA": "PVEM_MORENA", "PT_MORENA": "PT_MORENA", "NUM_VOTOS_CAN_NREG": "NUM_VOTOS_CAN_NREG"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 171742, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 31492, "cast_valid_mismatch": 31492, "registered_not_positive": 2356, "cast_gt_registered": 2384}, "n_stations_flagged": 33201, "created_at": "2026-06-05T12:47:18.770014", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"recount": 119417, "excluded": 141, "final": 52184}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": true}, {"id": "387d61195c5846f4a6262500ed9f9ef3", "name": "Mexico 2024 \u2014 Senate MR", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "INE Datos Abiertos. 69% recount.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "NOMBRE_ESTADO", "sub_region_col": "MUNICIPIO", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PAN": "PAN", "PRI": "PRI", "PRD": "PRD", "PVEM": "PVEM", "PT": "PT", "MC": "MC", "MORENA": "MORENA", "PAN_PRI_PRD": "PAN_PRI_PRD", "PAN_PRI": "PAN_PRI", "PAN_PRD": "PAN_PRD", "PRI_PRD": "PRI_PRD", "PVEM_PT_MORENA": "PVEM_PT_MORENA", "PVEM_PT": "PVEM_PT", "PVEM_MORENA": "PVEM_MORENA", "PT_MORENA": "PT_MORENA", "NUM_VOTOS_CAN_NREG": "NUM_VOTOS_CAN_NREG"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 170564, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 31117, "registered_not_positive": 1178, "cast_gt_registered": 1259, "votes_gt_valid": 31117}, "n_stations_flagged": 32050, "created_at": "2026-06-05T12:36:38.380931", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"recount": 118487, "excluded": 140, "final": 51937}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": true}, {"id": "312fb9ac39a14c37b430a2de17bec137", "name": "Brazil 2012 \u2014 Prefeito R1 (municipal, 407K secoes)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2012, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "TSE per-secao 24-of-27 states cached on Wayback.", "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "SG_UF", "sub_region_col": "NM_MUNICIPIO", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"10": "NR_VOTAVEL_10", "11": "NR_VOTAVEL_11", "12": "NR_VOTAVEL_12", "13": "NR_VOTAVEL_13", "14": "NR_VOTAVEL_14", "15": "NR_VOTAVEL_15", "16": "NR_VOTAVEL_16", "17": "NR_VOTAVEL_17", "19": "NR_VOTAVEL_19", "20": "NR_VOTAVEL_20", "21": "NR_VOTAVEL_21", "22": "NR_VOTAVEL_22", "23": "NR_VOTAVEL_23", "25": "NR_VOTAVEL_25", "27": "NR_VOTAVEL_27", "28": "NR_VOTAVEL_28", "29": "NR_VOTAVEL_29", "31": "NR_VOTAVEL_31", "33": "NR_VOTAVEL_33", "36": "NR_VOTAVEL_36", "40": "NR_VOTAVEL_40", "43": "NR_VOTAVEL_43", "44": "NR_VOTAVEL_44", "45": "NR_VOTAVEL_45", "50": "NR_VOTAVEL_50", "54": "NR_VOTAVEL_54", "55": "NR_VOTAVEL_55", "65": "NR_VOTAVEL_65", "70": "NR_VOTAVEL_70", "95": "NR_VOTAVEL_95", "96": "NR_VOTAVEL_96"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 407544, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 407544, "cast_gt_registered": 407544}, "n_stations_flagged": 407544, "created_at": "2026-06-05T12:09:33.437530", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.975, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.92, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.871, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.777, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.975, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.994, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.255, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.064, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.629, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.629, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.493, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.493, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 407544}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a5165aaafc1f47549308fac2c261e2c0", "name": "Mexico 2024 Diputaciones Federales Representaci\u00f3n Proporcional (INE casillas)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Mexico 2024 federal election, Mexico 2024 Diputaciones Federales Representaci\u00f3n Proporcional (INE casillas). Held 2 June 2024 in parallel with the Presidential election. 171,643 casillas \u00d7 4 coalition buckets. Source: INE Datos Abiertos DIPUTACIONES_FED_RP_2024.zip (portal.ine.mx/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/). Same coalition-ballot 15-column structure as Pres 2024; valid = VALIDOS + CAN_NREG (write-ins). ESTATUS_ACTA \u2192 result_status: final=47,739 / recount=123,755 / excluded=149.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_sigamos_haciendo_historia": "Diputaciones RP \u2014 Sigamos Haciendo Historia", "votes_fuerza_y_corazon_por_mexico": "Diputaciones RP \u2014 Fuerza y Coraz\u00f3n por M\u00e9xico", "votes_movimiento_ciudadano": "Diputaciones RP \u2014 Movimiento Ciudadano", "votes_no_registrados": "Diputaciones RP \u2014 no registrados"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {"final": "final", "recount": "recount", "excluded": "excluded", "unknown": "unknown"}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 171643, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 2356, "cast_gt_registered": 2366}, "n_stations_flagged": 2422, "created_at": "2026-06-05T11:58:52.789727", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 8254, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"recount": 123755, "excluded": 149, "final": 47739}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": true}, {"id": "51d1c4079faf4e92b10682ef4b7b3a66", "name": "Nigeria 2023 Presidential \u2014 cancellation overlay (INEC EC40G)", "metadata": {"country": "Nigeria", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Cancellation / EC40G(II) overlay for the 2023 Nigerian presidential election (25 Feb 2023). Built from mykeels' mirror of INEC's IReV portal \u2014 each polling unit's result_status is set to ``excluded`` when no Form EC8A image was uploaded (the operational signature of an EC40G(II) cancellation decision by the returning officer). Counts: 155,329 PUs with EC8A uploaded (``final``), 21,517 PUs without (inferred ``excluded``). INEC's published narrative figure was 1,578 cancelled PUs / ~1.04M register", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_total": "Total (overlay placeholder)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {"final": "final", "excluded": "excluded"}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 176846, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 176846}, "n_stations_flagged": 176846, "created_at": "2026-06-05T11:49:23.935073", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.108, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.659, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.484, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.316, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.108, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.659, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.365, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.995, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.514, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.383, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.808, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.484, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.484, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.28, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.28, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.666, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.415, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"excluded": 21517, "final": 155329}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": true}, {"id": "babc5f4749d24e77a3bdafd983451ac6", "name": "Mexico 2024 Presidential (INE casillas + audit overlay)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Mexico 2024 federal presidential election (2 June 2024). Sheinbaum (Morena coalition) won 59.76%; G\u00e1lvez (PAN-PRI-PRD) 27.45%; M\u00e1ynez (MC) 10.32%. 170,714 casillas \u00d7 4 candidate buckets (each candidate's vote is the sum of their coalition's per-party + per-combo columns from INE's 15-column ballot layout). Source: INE Datos Abiertos PRESIDENCIA_2024.zip at portal.ine.mx/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/. INE's ESTATUS_ACTA field carries workflow state; mapped: Cotejo\u2192final, Recuento\u2192recount, Paquete n", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_sheinbaum_morena_coalition": "Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo (MORENA + PVEM + PT \"Sigamos Haciendo Historia\")", "votes_galvez_pan_pri_prd_coalition": "X\u00f3chitl G\u00e1lvez Ruiz (PAN + PRI + PRD \"Fuerza y Coraz\u00f3n por M\u00e9xico\")", "votes_maynez_mc": "Jorge \u00c1lvarez M\u00e1ynez (Movimiento Ciudadano)", "votes_no_registrados": "Candidatos no registrados (write-in protest)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {"final": "final", "recount": "recount", "excluded": "excluded", "unknown": "unknown"}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 170714, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1251, "registered_not_positive": 1178}, "n_stations_flagged": 1253, "created_at": "2026-06-05T11:37:55.488810", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 9681, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"final": 54170, "recount": 116391, "excluded": 153}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": true}, {"id": "382325a966ae4140beba136c4fe6434c", "name": "Mexico 2024 Diputaciones Federales Mayor\u00eda Relativa (INE casillas)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Mexico 2024 federal election, Mexico 2024 Diputaciones Federales Mayor\u00eda Relativa (INE casillas). Held 2 June 2024 in parallel with the Presidential election. 170,465 casillas \u00d7 4 coalition buckets. Source: INE Datos Abiertos DIPUTACIONES_FED_MR_2024.zip (portal.ine.mx/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/). Same coalition-ballot 15-column structure as Pres 2024; valid = VALIDOS + CAN_NREG (write-ins). ESTATUS_ACTA \u2192 result_status: final=47,471 / recount=122,847 / excluded=147.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_sigamos_haciendo_historia": "Diputaciones MR \u2014 Sigamos Haciendo Historia", "votes_fuerza_y_corazon_por_mexico": "Diputaciones MR \u2014 Fuerza y Coraz\u00f3n por M\u00e9xico", "votes_movimiento_ciudadano": "Diputaciones MR \u2014 Movimiento Ciudadano", "votes_no_registrados": "Diputaciones MR \u2014 no registrados"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {"final": "final", "recount": "recount", "excluded": "excluded", "unknown": "unknown"}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 170465, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1178, "cast_gt_registered": 1232}, "n_stations_flagged": 1244, "created_at": "2026-06-05T11:22:53.116995", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 8254, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"recount": 122847, "excluded": 147, "final": 47471}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": true}, {"id": "cfcd63c860994da7b41535a09044e06b", "name": "Argentina 2021 General \u2014 Diputados Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='GENERAL', cargo='DIPUTADOS NACIONALES'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_frente_civico_por_santiago": "FRENTE CIVICO POR SANTIAGO", "votes_frente_patriotico_laborista": "FRENTE PATRIOTICO LABORISTA", "votes_frente_juntos_por_el_cambio": "FRENTE JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO", "votes_frente_renovador": "FRENTE RENOVADOR", "votes_unite_por_la_libertad_y_la_dignidad": "UNITE POR LA LIBERTAD Y LA DIGNIDAD", "votes_movimiento_libres_del_sur": "MOVIMIENTO LIBRES DEL SUR", "votes_por_un_santiago_obrero": "POR UN SANTIAGO OBRERO", "votes_eco_vamos_corrientes": "ECO + VAMOS CORRIENTES", "votes_frente_de_todos": "FRENTE DE TODOS", "votes_vamos_con_vos": "VAMOS CON VOS", "votes_compromiso_federal": "COMPROMISO FEDERAL", "votes_juntos": "JUNTOS", "votes_avanza_libertad": "AVANZA LIBERTAD", "votes_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_trabajadores_unidad": "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE TRABAJADORES - UNIDAD", "votes_valores": "+ VALORES", "votes_frente_vamos_con_vos": "FRENTE VAMOS CON VOS", "votes_juntos_por_el_cambio": "JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO +", "votes_unidos_por_salta": "UNIDOS POR SALTA", "votes_felicidad": "FELICIDAD", "votes_politica_obrera": "POLITICA OBRERA", "votes_frente_si_prs": "FRENTE SI + PRS", "votes_juntos_por_el_cambio_1": "JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO", "votes_la_libertad_avanza": "LA LIBERTAD AVANZA", "votes_autodeterminacion_y_libertad": "AUTODETERMINACI\u00d3N Y LIBERTAD", "votes_juntos_por_el_cambio_jxc": "JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO JXC", "votes_fuerza_republicana": "FUERZA REPUBLICANA", "votes_frente_amplio_por_tucuman": "FRENTE AMPLIO POR TUCUM\u00c1N", "votes_chaco_cambia_juntos_por_el_cambio": "CHACO CAMBIA + JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO", "votes_frente_integrador": "FRENTE INTEGRADOR", "votes_del_obrero": "DEL OBRERO", "votes_frente_de_todos_todos_san_juan": "FRENTE DE TODOS - TODOS SAN JUAN", "votes_consenso_ischigualasto": "CONSENSO ISCHIGUALASTO", "votes_fuerza_san_luis": "FUERZA SAN LUIS", "votes_unidos_por_san_luis": "UNIDOS POR SAN LUIS", "votes_todos_unidos": "TODOS UNIDOS", "votes_union_civica_radical": "UNI\u00d3N C\u00cdVICA RADICAL", "votes_juntos_por_el_cambio_chubut": "JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO CHUBUT", "votes_independiente_del_chubut": "INDEPENDIENTE DEL CHUBUT", "votes_chubut_somos_todos": "CHUBUT SOMOS TODOS", "votes_cambia_santa_cruz": "CAMBIA SANTA CRUZ", "votes_somos_energia_para_renovar_santa_cruz_ser": "SOMOS ENERG\u00cdA PARA RENOVAR SANTA CRUZ -SER-", "votes_movimiento_al_socialismo": "MOVIMIENTO AL SOCIALISMO", "votes_frente_amplio_progresista": "FRENTE AMPLIO PROGRESISTA", "votes_somos_futuro": "SOMOS FUTURO", "votes_soberania_popular": "SOBERANIA POPULAR", "votes_primero_santa_fe": "PRIMERO SANTA FE", "votes_podemos": "PODEMOS", "votes_juntos_por_entre_rios": "JUNTOS POR ENTRE R\u00cdOS", "votes_fe": "FE", "votes_conservador_popular": "CONSERVADOR POPULAR", "votes_nueva_izquierda": "NUEVA IZQUIERDA", "votes_socialista": "SOCIALISTA", "votes_somos_fueguinos": "SOMOS FUEGUINOS", "votes_juntos_por_el_cambio_tierra_del_fuego": "JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO TIERRA DEL FUEGO", "votes_obrero": "OBRERO", "votes_movimiento_popular_fueguino": "MOVIMIENTO POPULAR FUEGUINO", "votes_republicanos_unidos": "REPUBLICANOS UNIDOS", "votes_juntos_por_formosa_libre": "JUNTOS POR FORMOSA LIBRE", "votes_principios_y_conviccion": "PRINCIPIOS Y CONVICCI\u00d3N", "votes_cambia_jujuy": "CAMBIA JUJUY", "votes_vamos_la_rioja": "VAMOS LA RIOJA", "votes_union_del_centro_democratico": "UNION DEL CENTRO DEMOCRATICO", "votes_unidos": "UNIDOS", "votes_cambia_mendoza": "CAMBIA MENDOZA", "votes_verde": "VERDE", "votes_vamos_mendocinos": "VAMOS ! MENDOCINOS", "votes_federal": "FEDERAL", "votes_frente_amplio_catamarqueno": "FRENTE AMPLIO CATAMARQUE\u00d1O", "votes_corriente_de_pensamiento_bonaerense": "CORRIENTE DE PENSAMIENTO BONAERENSE", "votes_hacemos_por_cordoba": "HACEMOS POR C\u00d3RDOBA", "votes_encuentro_vecinal_cordoba": "ENCUENTRO VECINAL C\u00d3RDOBA", "votes_union_popular_federal": "UNI\u00d3N POPULAR FEDERAL", "votes_frente_renovador_de_la_concordia": "FRENTE RENOVADOR DE LA CONCORDIA", "votes_libertad_valores_y_cambio": "LIBERTAD, VALORES Y CAMBIO", "votes_cambia_neuquen": "CAMBIA NEUQU\u00c9N", "votes_movimiento_popular_neuquino": "MOVIMIENTO POPULAR NEUQUINO", "votes_coalicion_civica_afirmacion_para_una_republica_igualitaria_ari": "COALICI\u00d3N C\u00cdVICA - AFIRMACI\u00d3N PARA UNA REP\u00daBLICA IGUALITARIA (ARI)", "votes_juntos_somos_rio_negro": "JUNTOS SOMOS RIO NEGRO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 100237, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T10:06:19.407449", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 99846, "n_distinct_geometry": 4818, "quality_index": 3.934, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.94, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.796, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.639, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.621, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 100237}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6ba6daae1ef14b2cbc16c3ef57f952b0", "name": "Argentina 2017 General \u2014 Diputados Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='GENERAL', cargo='DIPUTADO NACIONAL'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_frente_renovador_1pais": "FRENTE RENOVADOR - 1PAIS", "votes_juntos_podemos_mas": "JUNTOS PODEMOS MAS", "votes_somos_corrientes": "SOMOS CORRIENTES", "votes_encuentro_por_corrientes_eco_cambiemos": "ENCUENTRO POR CORRIENTES - ECO + CAMBIEMOS", "votes_avancemos_hacia_1pais_mejor": "AVANCEMOS HACIA 1PAIS MEJOR", "votes_evolucion": "EVOLUCION", "votes_unidad_portena": "UNIDAD PORTE\u00d1A", "votes_vamos_juntos": "VAMOS JUNTOS", "votes_autodeterminacion_y_libertad": "AUTODETERMINACION Y LIBERTAD", "votes_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_los_trabajadores": "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE LOS TRABAJADORES", "votes_primero_la_gente": "PRIMERO LA GENTE", "votes_encuentro_vecinal_cordoba": "ENCUENTRO VECINAL CORDOBA", "votes_cambiemos": "CAMBIEMOS", "votes_frente_cordoba_ciudadana": "FRENTE CORDOBA CIUDADANA", "votes_izquierda_al_frente_por_el_socialismo": "IZQUIERDA AL FRENTE POR EL SOCIALISMO", "votes_union_por_cordoba": "UNION POR CORDOBA", "votes_cambiemos_buenos_aires": "CAMBIEMOS BUENOS AIRES", "votes_frente_justicialista": "FRENTE JUSTICIALISTA", "votes_unidad_ciudadana": "UNIDAD CIUDADANA", "votes_1pais": "1PAIS", "votes_del_obrero": "DEL OBRERO", "votes_frente_chaco_merece_mas": "FRENTE CHACO MERECE MAS", "votes_un_nuevo_pais_1p": "UN NUEVO PAIS (1P)", "votes_frente_civico_y_social_cambiemos": "FRENTE CIVICO Y SOCIAL - CAMBIEMOS", "votes_frente_de_unidad_ciudadana": "FRENTE DE UNIDAD CIUDADANA", "votes_frente_justicialista_para_la_victoria": "FRENTE JUSTICIALISTA PARA LA VICTORIA", "votes_obrero": "OBRERO", "votes_cambiemos_para_el_bicentenario": "CAMBIEMOS PARA EL BICENTENARIO", "votes_frente_justicialista_por_tucuman": "FRENTE JUSTICIALISTA POR TUCUMAN", "votes_fuerza_republicana": "FUERZA REPUBLICANA", "votes_frente_justicialista_somos_entre_rios": "FRENTE JUSTICIALISTA SOMOS ENTRE RIOS", "votes_socialista": "SOCIALISTA", "votes_nueva_izquierda": "NUEVA IZQUIERDA", "votes_somos_mendoza": "SOMOS MENDOZA", "votes_intransigente": "INTRANSIGENTE", "votes_union_popular": "UNION POPULAR", "votes_instrumento_electoral_por_la_unidad_popular": "INSTRUMENTO ELECTORAL POR LA UNIDAD POPULAR", "votes_nuevo_octubre": "NUEVO OCTUBRE", "votes_agrario_y_social": "AGRARIO Y SOCIAL", "votes_frente_avancemos": "FRENTE AVANCEMOS", "votes_frente_cambiemos": "FRENTE CAMBIEMOS", "votes_frente_renovador_de_la_concordia": "FRENTE RENOVADOR DE LA CONCORDIA", "votes_espacio_grande": "ESPACIO GRANDE", "votes_frente_progresista_civico_y_social": "FRENTE PROGRESISTA CIVICO Y SOCIAL", "votes_frente_social_y_popular": "FRENTE SOCIAL Y POPULAR", "votes_popular": "POPULAR", "votes_unite_por_la_libertad_y_la_dignidad": "UNITE POR LA LIBERTAD Y LA DIGNIDAD", "votes_ciudad_futura": "CIUDAD FUTURA", "votes_1_proyecto_santafesino": "1 PROYECTO SANTAFESINO", "votes_frente_para_la_victoria": "FRENTE PARA LA VICTORIA", "votes_cambiemos_rio_negro": "CAMBIEMOS RIO NEGRO", "votes_coalicion_civica_ari": "COALICION CIVICA - ARI", "votes_movimiento_popular_neuquino": "MOVIMIENTO POPULAR NEUQUINO", "votes_1pais_frente_renovador_neuquen_a": "1PAIS FRENTE RENOVADOR NEUQUEN +A", "votes_frente_neuquino": "FRENTE NEUQUINO", "votes_unidad_ciudadana_para_la_victoria": "UNIDAD CIUDADANA PARA LA VICTORIA", "votes_movimiento_libres_del_sur": "MOVIMIENTO LIBRES DEL SUR", "votes_frente_civico_por_santiago": "FRENTE CIVICO POR SANTIAGO", "votes_frente_renovador_1pais_1": "FRENTE RENOVADOR 1PAIS", "votes_izquierda_por_una_opcion_socialista": "IZQUIERDA POR UNA OPCION SOCIALISTA", "votes_cambiemos_pais": "CAMBIEMOS PAIS", "votes_frente_ciudadano_para_la_victoria": "FRENTE CIUDADANO PARA LA VICTORIA", "votes_frente_popular_para_la_liberacion": "FRENTE POPULAR PARA LA LIBERACION", "votes_frente_unidad_y_renovacion": "FRENTE UNIDAD Y RENOVACION", "votes_movimiento_socialista_de_los_trabajadores": "MOVIMIENTO SOCIALISTA DE LOS TRABAJADORES", "votes_salta_somos_todos": "SALTA SOMOS TODOS", "votes_justicialista": "JUSTICIALISTA", "votes_humanista": "HUMANISTA", "votes_de_los_trabajadores_socialistas": "DE LOS TRABAJADORES SOCIALISTAS", "votes_frente_cambiemos_la_pampa": "FRENTE CAMBIEMOS LA PAMPA", "votes_frente_progresista_pampeano": "FRENTE PROGRESISTA PAMPEANO", "votes_cambiemos_san_juan": "CAMBIEMOS SAN JUAN", "votes_frente_progresista_popular": "FRENTE PROGRESISTA POPULAR", "votes_frente_todos": "FRENTE TODOS", "votes_nueva_dirigencia": "NUEVA DIRIGENCIA", "votes_adn_accion_por_una_democracia_nueva": "ADN - ACCION POR UNA DEMOCRACIA NUEVA", "votes_1_pais_somos_san_juan": "1 PAIS SOMOS SAN JUAN", "votes_frente_amplio_formoseno_cambiemos": "FRENTE AMPLIO FORMOSE\u00d1O CAMBIEMOS", "votes_principios_y_conviccion": "PRINCIPIOS Y CONVICCION", "votes_frente_de_la_victoria": "FRENTE DE LA VICTORIA", "votes_movimiento_integracion_latinoamericana_de_expresion_social": "MOVIMIENTO INTEGRACION LATINOAMERICANA DE EXPRESION SOCIAL", "votes_frente_jujeno_cambiemos": "FRENTE JUJE\u00d1O CAMBIEMOS", "votes_federal_fueguino": "FEDERAL FUEGUINO", "votes_iniciativa_por_la_union": "INICIATIVA POR LA UNION", "votes_cambiemos_tierra_del_fuego": "CAMBIEMOS TIERRA DEL FUEGO", "votes_frente_ciudadano_y_social": "FRENTE CIUDADANO Y SOCIAL", "votes_frente_tierra_de_union": "FRENTE TIERRA DE UNION", "votes_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_los_trabajadores_partido_obrero_izquier": "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE LOS TRABAJADORES - PARTIDO OBRERO + IZQUIERDA POR UNA OPCION SOCIALISTA", "votes_union_para_vivir_mejor_cambiemos": "UNION PARA VIVIR MEJOR - CAMBIEMOS", "votes_movimiento_politico_social_y_cultural_proyecto_sur": "MOVIMIENTO POLITICO, SOCIAL Y CULTURAL PROYECTO SUR", "votes_frente_renovador_autentico": "FRENTE RENOVADOR AUTENTICO", "votes_movimiento_norte_grande": "MOVIMIENTO NORTE GRANDE", "votes_alternativa_popular_riojana": "ALTERNATIVA POPULAR RIOJANA", "votes_cambiemos_fuerza_civica_riojana": "CAMBIEMOS - FUERZA CIVICA RIOJANA", "votes_frente_justicialista_riojano": "FRENTE JUSTICIALISTA RIOJANO", "votes_una_rioja": "UNA RIOJA", "votes_del_trabajo_y_del_pueblo": "DEL TRABAJO Y DEL PUEBLO", "votes_socialista_autentico_del_chubut": "SOCIALISTA AUTENTICO DEL CHUBUT", "votes_cambiemos_chubut": "CAMBIEMOS CHUBUT", "votes_frente_chubut_para_todos": "FRENTE CHUBUT PARA TODOS", "votes_de_trabajadores_por_el_socialismo": "DE TRABAJADORES POR EL SOCIALISMO", "votes_avanzar_y_cambiemos_por_san_luis": "AVANZAR Y CAMBIEMOS POR SAN LUIS", "votes_frente_unidad_justicialista_san_luis": "FRENTE UNIDAD JUSTICIALISTA SAN LUIS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 99681, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T09:58:53.510265", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 99241, "n_distinct_geometry": 4640, "quality_index": 3.926, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.953, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.751, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.609, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.77, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.084, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.375, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.037, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.609, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.577, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.411, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.411, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 99681}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "10813981620a4eb2905e4c473bd7566f", "name": "Argentina 2015 Runoff \u2014 Presidente", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2015, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='BALLOTAGE', cargo='PRESIDENTE'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_frente_para_la_victoria": "FRENTE PARA LA VICTORIA", "votes_cambiemos": "CAMBIEMOS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 94170, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T09:52:01.204617", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 93727, "n_distinct_geometry": 4640, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.765, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.59, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Cambiemos", "winner_candidate": "M. Macri", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Frente para la Victoria (FplV)", "margin": 2.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 94170}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1ac3234586e8429b9f1f767db19195ed", "name": "France 2024 \u2014 L\u00e9gislatives R1", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_com": "COM", "votes_div": "DIV", "votes_dsv": "DSV", "votes_dvc": "DVC", "votes_dvd": "DVD", "votes_dvg": "DVG", "votes_eco": "ECO", "votes_ens": "ENS", "votes_exd": "EXD", "votes_exg": "EXG", "votes_fi": "FI", "votes_hor": "HOR", "votes_lr": "LR", "votes_rdg": "RDG", "votes_rec": "REC", "votes_reg": "REG", "votes_rn": "RN", "votes_soc": "SOC", "votes_udi": "UDI", "votes_ug": "UG", "votes_uxd": "UXD", "votes_vec": "VEC"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 70099, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 2, "votes_gt_valid": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-06-05T09:47:04.787175", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 70099}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4fa3ddacf0ac4ef29962928c59f35a94", "name": "France 2024 \u2014 Europ\u00e9ennes", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_lcom": "LCOM", "votes_ldiv": "LDIV", "votes_ldvd": "LDVD", "votes_ldvg": "LDVG", "votes_leco": "LECO", "votes_lens": "LENS", "votes_lexd": "LEXD", "votes_lexg": "LEXG", "votes_lfi": "LFI", "votes_llr": "LLR", "votes_lrec": "LREC", "votes_lrn": "LRN", "votes_lug": "LUG", "votes_lvec": "LVEC"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 70104, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-06-05T09:42:24.664350", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 70104}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4db737b2853b4c61998ff17a53d4c9e4", "name": "France 2022 \u2014 Pr\u00e9sidentielle R2", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2022, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_emmanuel_macron": "EMMANUEL MACRON", "votes_marine_le_pen": "MARINE LE PEN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 69682, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 11}, "n_stations_flagged": 11, "created_at": "2026-06-05T09:37:35.420323", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 69682}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7bbb6a3c711a4032a33a3fec72e0a880", "name": "France 2022 \u2014 Pr\u00e9sidentielle R1", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2022, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_anne_hidalgo": "ANNE HIDALGO", "votes_emmanuel_macron": "EMMANUEL MACRON", "votes_fabien_roussel": "FABIEN ROUSSEL", "votes_jean_lassalle": "JEAN LASSALLE", "votes_jean_luc_m_lenchon": "JEAN-LUC M\u00c9LENCHON", "votes_marine_le_pen": "MARINE LE PEN", "votes_nathalie_arthaud": "NATHALIE ARTHAUD", "votes_nicolas_dupont_aignan": "NICOLAS DUPONT-AIGNAN", "votes_philippe_poutou": "PHILIPPE POUTOU", "votes_val_rie_p_cresse": "VAL\u00c9RIE P\u00c9CRESSE", "votes_yannick_jadot": "YANNICK JADOT", "votes_ric_zemmour": "\u00c9RIC ZEMMOUR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 69682, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-06-05T09:32:42.788979", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 69682}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b34d61f11a8a4945923e5e090498f0ff", "name": "France 2017 \u2014 Pr\u00e9sidentielle R2", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2017, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_emmanuel_macron": "EMMANUEL MACRON", "votes_marine_le_pen": "MARINE LE PEN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 69242, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-05T09:27:53.752014", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 69242}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d2e4434a49a14315a601928f9d7d54ce", "name": "France 2017 \u2014 Pr\u00e9sidentielle R1", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2017, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "", "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_beno_t_hamon": "BENO\u00ceT HAMON", "votes_emmanuel_macron": "EMMANUEL MACRON", "votes_fran_ois_asselineau": "FRAN\u00c7OIS ASSELINEAU", "votes_fran_ois_fillon": "FRAN\u00c7OIS FILLON", "votes_jacques_cheminade": "JACQUES CHEMINADE", "votes_jean_lassalle": "JEAN LASSALLE", "votes_jean_luc_m_lenchon": "JEAN-LUC M\u00c9LENCHON", "votes_marine_le_pen": "MARINE LE PEN", "votes_nathalie_arthaud": "NATHALIE ARTHAUD", "votes_nicolas_dupont_aignan": "NICOLAS DUPONT-AIGNAN", "votes_philippe_poutou": "PHILIPPE POUTOU"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 69242, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-05T09:22:39.314685", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 69242}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4c9935c81c744f4eac4f784d730e2543", "name": "Ukraine 2020 Local Elections \u2014 Elected Officials Roster (25.10.2020)", "metadata": {"country": "Ukraine", "year": 2020, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ukraine 2020 local elections, held 25 October 2020. WINNERS-ONLY dataset extracted from CVK's `obranyvm` open-data XML: 43,392 elected council deputies (oblast/raion/city/settlement/rural/tg) + 1,419 elected heads/mayors = 43,414 winners across 1,575 councils in 25 oblasts. NO defeated candidates, NO polling-station tallies, NO registered/cast/valid (none are published in the source). The vote column is F58 (deputies) / F50 (heads) = the elected person's total votes received. Long-format with `c", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "candidate", "long_candidate_votes_col": "votes", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {"final": "final"}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 43414, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 21573, "registered_not_positive": 43414}, "n_stations_flagged": 43414, "created_at": "2026-06-05T09:17:52.478240", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.505, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.73, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.552, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.325, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.505, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.206, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.332, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.583, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.168, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.542, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.552, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.325, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.325, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.383, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.383, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.268, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.268, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.688, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 43414}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7ea9f6fa0e544cfb9eb381e13def4f44", "name": "Argentina 2021 General \u2014 Concejales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='GENERAL', cargo='CONCEJALES'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_juntos": "JUNTOS", "votes_frente_de_todos": "FRENTE DE TODOS", "votes_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_trabajadores_unidad": "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE TRABAJADORES - UNIDAD", "votes_frente_vamos_con_vos": "FRENTE VAMOS CON VOS", "votes_movimiento_organizacion_democratica": "MOVIMIENTO ORGANIZACION DEMOCRATICA", "votes_nueva_necochea": "NUEVA NECOCHEA", "votes_agrupacion_comunal_transformadora": "AGRUPACION COMUNAL TRANSFORMADORA", "votes_avanza_libertad": "AVANZA LIBERTAD", "votes_federal": "FEDERAL", "votes_republicano_federal": "REPUBLICANO FEDERAL", "votes_unidos_por_pehuajo": "UNIDOS POR PEHUAJO", "votes_union_por_todos": "UNION POR TODOS", "votes_union_celeste_y_blanco": "UNION CELESTE Y BLANCO", "votes_unidos_pinamar": "UNIDOS PINAMAR", "votes_vecinos_en_accion_pinamar": "VECINOS EN ACCION PINAMAR", "votes_vocacion_social": "VOCACION SOCIAL", "votes_todos_por_saavedra": "TODOS POR SAAVEDRA", "votes_union_vecinal_salliquelo": "UNION VECINAL SALLIQUELO", "votes_convocacion_civica_por_san_isidro": "CONVOCACION CIVICA POR SAN ISIDRO", "votes_podemos_azul": "PODEMOS AZUL", "votes_todos_por_bahia": "TODOS POR BAHIA", "votes_integracion_ciudadana": "INTEGRACION CIUDADANA", "votes_accion_tandilense": "ACCION TANDILENSE", "votes_mision_accion_compromiso": "MISION, ACCION COMPROMISO", "votes_primero_bolivar": "PRIMERO BOLIVAR", "votes_innovar_bragado": "INNOVAR BRAGADO", "votes_accion_vecinal_por_brandsen": "ACCION VECINAL POR BRANDSEN", "votes_accion_por_tornquist": "ACCION POR TORNQUIST", "votes_u_vecinal_del_partido_de_t_lauquen": "U. VECINAL DEL PARTIDO DE T. LAUQUEN", "votes_nueva_alternativa_carmena": "NUEVA ALTERNATIVA CARME\u00d1A", "votes_movimiento_vecinal_del_partido_de_tres_arroyos": "MOVIMIENTO VECINAL DEL PARTIDO DE TRES ARROYOS", "votes_humanista": "HUMANISTA", "votes_bien_comun_por_rosales": "BIEN COMUN POR ROSALES", "votes_corriente_de_pensamiento_bonaerense": "CORRIENTE DE PENSAMIENTO BONAERENSE", "votes_juntos_por_chascomus": "JUNTOS POR CHASCOMUS", "votes_primero_chivilcoy": "PRIMERO CHIVILCOY", "votes_primero_dolores": "PRIMERO DOLORES", "votes_cambia_mendoza": "CAMBIA MENDOZA", "votes_verde": "VERDE", "votes_de_los_jubilados": "DE LOS JUBILADOS", "votes_vamos_mendocinos": "VAMOS ! MENDOCINOS", "votes_compromiso_federal": "COMPROMISO FEDERAL", "votes_agrupacion_vecinal_puebla_la_costa": "AGRUPACION VECINAL PUEBLA LA COSTA", "votes_unidos_por_la_costa": "UNIDOS POR LA COSTA", "votes_accion_por_villarino": "ACCION POR VILLARINO", "votes_peronenses_primero": "PERONENSES PRIMERO", "votes_belgrano_primero": "BELGRANO PRIMERO", "votes_frente_patriota": "FRENTE PATRIOTA", "votes_crear_mar_del_plata": "CREAR MAR DEL PLATA", "votes_accion_marplatense": "ACCION MARPLATENSE", "votes_ac_vecinal_gral_villegas": "AC. VECINAL GRAL. VILLEGAS", "votes_juntos_por_el_cambio": "JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO", "votes_frente_amplio_catamarqueno": "FRENTE AMPLIO CATAMARQUE\u00d1O", "votes_con_vos_podemos": "CON VOS PODEMOS", "votes_union_vecinal_de_a_gonzales_chaves": "UNION VECINAL DE A. GONZALES CHAVES", "votes_unidos_por_santa_rosa": "UNIDOS POR SANTA ROSA", "votes_movimiento_integrador_santarroseno": "MOVIMIENTO INTEGRADOR SANTARROSE\u00d1O", "votes_somos_fray_mamerto_esquiu": "SOMOS FRAY MAMERTO ESQUI\u00da", "votes_frente_unidos_por_san_jose": "FRENTE UNIDOS POR SAN JOSE", "votes_participacion_popular": "PARTICIPACION POPULAR", "votes_nuevos_rumbos": "NUEVOS RUMBOS", "votes_agrupacion_municipal_primero_lobos": "AGRUPACION MUNICIPAL PRIMERO LOBOS", "votes_frente_justicialista": "FRENTE JUSTICIALISTA", "votes_frente_encuentro_civico_por_santiago": "FRENTE ENCUENTRO CIVICO POR SANTIAGO", "votes_frente_patriotico_laborista": "FRENTE PATRIOTICO LABORISTA", "votes_partido_movimiento_de_accion_vecinal": "PARTIDO MOVIMIENTO DE ACCION  VECINAL", "votes_partido_nueva_alternativa": "PARTIDO NUEVA ALTERNATIVA", "votes_partido_podemos": "PARTIDO PODEMOS", "votes_partido_movimiento_para_la_accion_solidaria": "PARTIDO MOVIMIENTO PARA LA ACCION SOLIDARIA", "votes_frente_juntos_por_el_cambio": "FRENTE JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO", "votes_frente_renovador_y_progresista": "FRENTE RENOVADOR Y PROGRESISTA", "votes_unidad_y_accion_por_mar_chiquita": "UNIDAD Y ACCION POR MAR CHIQUITA", "votes_encuentro_vecinal_en_accion": "ENCUENTRO VECINAL EN ACCION"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 43188, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T09:14:20.009960", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 43175, "n_distinct_geometry": 1035, "quality_index": 3.934, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.94, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.796, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.639, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.621, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 43188}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "db80d22bd4e64bebb4e2f6d99e7c933e", "name": "2023 Paso Gobernador/A", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='PASO', cargo='GOBERNADOR/A'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_esperanza_del_pueblo": "ESPERANZA DEL PUEBLO", "votes_principios_y_valores": "PRINCIPIOS Y VALORES", "votes_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_trabajadores_unidad": "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE TRABAJADORES - UNIDAD", "votes_politica_obrera": "POLITICA OBRERA", "votes_movimiento_de_avanzada_socialista": "MOVIMIENTO DE AVANZADA SOCIALISTA", "votes_celeste_provida": "CELESTE PROVIDA", "votes_juntos_por_el_cambio": "JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO", "votes_proyecto_joven": "PROYECTO JOVEN", "votes_movimiento_libres_del_sur": "MOVIMIENTO LIBRES DEL SUR", "votes_frente_federal_de_accion_solidaria_de_la_provincia_de_buenos_air": "FRENTE FEDERAL DE ACCION SOLIDARIA DE LA PROVINCIA DE BUENOS AIRES", "votes_frente_patriota_federal": "FRENTE PATRIOTA FEDERAL", "votes_unidad_social": "UNIDAD SOCIAL", "votes_union_por_la_patria": "UNION POR LA PATRIA", "votes_la_libertad_avanza": "LA LIBERTAD AVANZA", "votes_movimiento_de_integracion_federal_mif": "MOVIMIENTO DE INTEGRACION FEDERAL (MIF)", "votes_vocacion_social": "VOCACION SOCIAL", "votes_politica_abierta_para_la_integridad_social": "POLITICA ABIERTA PARA LA INTEGRIDAD SOCIAL", "votes_corriente_de_pensamiento_bonaerense": "CORRIENTE DE PENSAMIENTO BONAERENSE", "votes_liber_ar": "LIBER.AR", "votes_confianza_publica": "CONFIANZA PUBLICA", "votes_buenos_aires_primero_bap": "BUENOS AIRES PRIMERO (BAP)", "votes_justicia_y_dignidad_patriotica": "JUSTICIA Y DIGNIDAD PATRIOTICA", "votes_todos_por_buenos_aires": "TODOS POR BUENOS AIRES", "votes_por_santa_cruz": "POR SANTA CRUZ", "votes_cambia_santa_cruz": "CAMBIA SANTA CRUZ", "votes_movimiento_al_socialismo": "MOVIMIENTO AL SOCIALISMO", "votes_libres_del_sur": "LIBRES DEL SUR", "votes_fte_de_izq_y_de_trabajadores_unidad": "FTE DE IZQ. Y DE TRABAJADORES - UNIDAD"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 42170, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T09:11:10.837374", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 42157, "n_distinct_geometry": 998, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 42170}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "48431e5b05b34b74b30e25553e3dc01d", "name": "Argentina 2019 General \u2014 Diputados Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2019, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='GENERAL', cargo='DIPUTADOS PROVINCIALES'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_frente_de_todos": "FRENTE DE TODOS", "votes_juntos_por_el_cambio": "JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO", "votes_frente_nos": "FRENTE NOS", "votes_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_trabajadores_unidad": "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE TRABAJADORES - UNIDAD", "votes_consenso_federal": "CONSENSO FEDERAL", "votes_gem": "GEM"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19274, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-05T09:07:14.682904", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 17328, "n_distinct_geometry": 104, "quality_index": 3.915, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.779, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.618, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.998, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.053, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.083, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 19274}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "56e6af19a95f48c0b4152fa5a411c4c0", "name": "Argentina 2013 General \u2014 Diputados Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='GENERAL', cargo='DIPUTADO NACIONAL'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_autodeterminacion_y_libertad": "AUTODETERMINACION Y LIBERTAD", "votes_frente_para_la_victoria": "FRENTE PARA LA VICTORIA", "votes_unen": "UNEN", "votes_union_pro": "UNION PRO", "votes_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_los_trabajadores": "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE LOS TRABAJADORES", "votes_camino_popular": "CAMINO POPULAR", "votes_unidos_por_la_libertad_y_el_trabajo": "UNIDOS POR LA LIBERTAD Y EL TRABAJO", "votes_frente_renovador": "FRENTE RENOVADOR", "votes_union_con_fe": "UNION CON FE", "votes_frente_progresista_civico_y_social": "FRENTE PROGRESISTA CIVICO Y SOCIAL", "votes_partido_obrero": "PARTIDO OBRERO", "votes_frente_civico_y_social": "FRENTE CIVICO Y SOCIAL", "votes_frente_tercera_posicion_f3p_unidad_catamarquena": "FRENTE TERCERA POSICION (F3P) UNIDAD CATAMARQUE\u00d1A", "votes_union_civica_radical": "UNION CIVICA RADICAL", "votes_coalicion_civica_afirmacion_para_una_republica_igualitaria_ari": "COALICION CIVICA - AFIRMACION PARA UNA REPUBLICA IGUALITARIA (ARI)", "votes_vecinalismo_independiente": "VECINALISMO INDEPENDIENTE", "votes_encuentro_vecinal_cordoba": "ENCUENTRO VECINAL CORDOBA", "votes_union_por_cordoba": "UNION POR CORDOBA", "votes_cambio_popular": "CAMBIO POPULAR", "votes_encuentro_por_corrientes": "ENCUENTRO POR CORRIENTES", "votes_union_por_chaco": "UNION POR CHACO", "votes_movimiento_socialista_de_los_trabajadores_mst": "MOVIMIENTO SOCIALISTA DE LOS TRABAJADORES (MST)", "votes_movimiento_polo_social_la_tercera_posicion_de_la_gente": "MOVIMIENTO POLO SOCIAL LA TERCERA POSICION DE LA GENTE", "votes_partido_de_accion_chubutense": "PARTIDO DE ACCION CHUBUTENSE", "votes_nueva_izquierda": "NUEVA IZQUIERDA", "votes_alianza_union_por_entre_rios": "ALIANZA UNION POR ENTRE RIOS", "votes_alianza_frente_amplio_progresista": "ALIANZA FRENTE AMPLIO PROGRESISTA", "votes_frente_amplio_formoseno": "FRENTE AMPLIO FORMOSE\u00d1O", "votes_partido_por_un_pueblo_unido": "PARTIDO POR UN PUEBLO UNIDO", "votes_frente_jujeno": "FRENTE JUJE\u00d1O", "votes_frente_union_pro": "FRENTE UNION PRO", "votes_frente_primero_jujuy": "FRENTE PRIMERO JUJUY", "votes_partido_justicialista": "PARTIDO JUSTICIALISTA", "votes_partido_humanista": "PARTIDO HUMANISTA", "votes_pueblo_nuevo": "PUEBLO NUEVO", "votes_partido_de_los_trabajadores_socialistas": "PARTIDO DE LOS TRABAJADORES SOCIALISTAS", "votes_frente_pampeano_civico_y_social_frepam": "FRENTE PAMPEANO CIVICO Y SOCIAL - FREPAM", "votes_frente_propuesta_federal": "FRENTE PROPUESTA FEDERAL", "votes_izquierda_por_una_opcion_socialista": "IZQUIERDA POR UNA OPCION SOCIALISTA", "votes_compromiso_federal": "COMPROMISO FEDERAL", "votes_fuerza_civica_riojana": "FUERZA CIVICA RIOJANA", "votes_frente_nuevo_pacto_federal": "FRENTE NUEVO PACTO FEDERAL", "votes_union_pd_pro": "UNION PD-PRO", "votes_frente_amplio_progresista_coalicion_civica_ari": "FRENTE AMPLIO PROGRESISTA-COALICION CIVICA-ARI", "votes_partido_socialista": "PARTIDO SOCIALISTA", "votes_frente_renovador_de_la_concordia": "FRENTE RENOVADOR DE LA CONCORDIA", "votes_frente_unidos": "FRENTE UNIDOS", "votes_union_popular": "UNION POPULAR", "votes_movimiento_libres_del_sur": "MOVIMIENTO LIBRES DEL SUR", "votes_movimiento_popular_neuquino": "MOVIMIENTO POPULAR NEUQUINO", "votes_union_de_los_neuquinos": "UNION DE LOS NEUQUINOS", "votes_compromiso_civico_neuquino": "COMPROMISO CIVICO NEUQUINO", "votes_frente_progresista_sur": "FRENTE PROGRESISTA SUR", "votes_alianza_frente_progresista": "ALIANZA FRENTE PROGRESISTA", "votes_partido_de_la_victoria": "PARTIDO DE LA VICTORIA", "votes_movimiento_independiente_justicia_y_dignidad": "MOVIMIENTO INDEPENDIENTE JUSTICIA Y DIGNIDAD", "votes_partido_renovador_de_salta": "PARTIDO RENOVADOR DE SALTA", "votes_memoria_y_movilizacion_social": "MEMORIA Y MOVILIZACION SOCIAL", "votes_salta_somos_todos": "SALTA SOMOS TODOS", "votes_frente_plural": "FRENTE PLURAL", "votes_frente_popular_salteno": "FRENTE POPULAR SALTE\u00d1O", "votes_cruzada_renovadora": "CRUZADA RENOVADORA", "votes_partido_dignidad_ciudadana": "PARTIDO DIGNIDAD CIUDADANA", "votes_frente_del_pueblo": "FRENTE DEL PUEBLO", "votes_democrata_independiente": "DEMOCRATA INDEPENDIENTE", "votes_union_para_vivir_mejor": "UNION PARA VIVIR MEJOR", "votes_santafesino_cien_por_ciento": "SANTAFESINO CIEN POR CIENTO", "votes_unite_con_fe_por_la_cultura_educacion_y_trabajo": "UNITE! CON FE POR LA CULTURA, EDUCACION Y TRABAJO", "votes_union_pro_santa_fe_federal": "UNION PRO SANTA FE FEDERAL", "votes_partido_fe": "PARTIDO FE", "votes_frente_civico_por_santiago": "FRENTE CIVICO POR SANTIAGO", "votes_pro_propuesta_republicana": "PRO PROPUESTA REPUBLICANA", "votes_fuerza_republicana": "FUERZA REPUBLICANA", "votes_laborista_de_la_independencia": "LABORISTA DE LA INDEPENDENCIA", "votes_alternativa_popular": "ALTERNATIVA POPULAR", "votes_frente_acuerdo_civico_y_social": "FRENTE ACUERDO CIVICO Y SOCIAL", "votes_gen": "GEN", "votes_movimiento_popular_fueguino": "MOVIMIENTO POPULAR FUEGUINO", "votes_partido_popular": "PARTIDO POPULAR", "votes_espacio_democratico_para_la_victoria": "ESPACIO DEMOCRATICO PARA LA VICTORIA", "votes_movimiento_solidario_popular": "MOVIMIENTO SOLIDARIO POPULAR", "votes_union_federal": "UNION FEDERAL"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19398, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 297, "cast_gt_registered": 329}, "n_stations_flagged": 626, "created_at": "2026-06-05T08:13:54.329557", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 19394, "n_distinct_geometry": 418, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.953, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.772, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.588, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.742, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.145, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.036, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 19398}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "02426f9a6a0941b88d1b493b65c080e0", "name": "2015 Paso Gobernador", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2015, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='PASO', cargo='GOBERNADOR'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_alianza_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_los_trabajadores": "ALIANZA FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE LOS TRABAJADORES", "votes_alianza_unidos_por_una_nueva_alternativa_una": "ALIANZA UNIDOS POR UNA NUEVA ALTERNATIVA (UNA)", "votes_movimiento_al_socialismo": "MOVIMIENTO AL SOCIALISMO", "votes_mst_movimiento_socialista_de_los_trabajadores": "MST-MOVIMIENTO SOCIALISTA DE LOS TRABAJADORES", "votes_cambiemos_buenos_aires": "CAMBIEMOS BUENOS AIRES", "votes_alianza_frente_para_la_victoria": "ALIANZA FRENTE PARA LA VICTORIA", "votes_alianza_progresistas": "ALIANZA PROGRESISTAS", "votes_alianza_compromiso_federal": "ALIANZA COMPROMISO FEDERAL", "votes_alianza_frente_popular": "ALIANZA FRENTE POPULAR", "votes_patria_grande": "PATRIA GRANDE", "votes_movimiento_libres_del_sur": "MOVIMIENTO LIBRES DEL SUR", "votes_partido_union_vecinal_prov": "PARTIDO UNION VECINAL PROV.", "votes_alianza_cambiemos": "ALIANZA CAMBIEMOS", "votes_partido_del_trabajo_y_del_pueblo": "PARTIDO DEL TRABAJO Y DEL PUEBLO", "votes_alianza_cambiemos_chubut": "ALIANZA CAMBIEMOS CHUBUT", "votes_movimiento_de_accion_vecinal": "MOVIMIENTO DE ACCION VECINAL", "votes_socialista": "SOCIALISTA", "votes_de_accion_chubutense": "DE ACCION CHUBUTENSE", "votes_alianza_frente_progresista_popular": "ALIANZA FRENTE PROGRESISTA POPULAR", "votes_cruzada_renovadora": "CRUZADA RENOVADORA", "votes_nueva_izquierda": "NUEVA IZQUIERDA", "votes_alianza_frente_tercera_posicion": "ALIANZA FRENTE TERCERA POSICION", "votes_obrero": "OBRERO", "votes_union_popular": "UNION POPULAR", "votes_juntos_por_san_juan": "JUNTOS POR SAN JUAN", "votes_alianza_frente_union_chubut_somos_todos": "ALIANZA FRENTE UNION CHUBUT SOMOS TODOS", "votes_movimiento_polo_social_la_tercera_posicion_de_la_gente": "MOVIMIENTO POLO SOCIAL LA TERCERA POSICION DE LA GENTE", "votes_alianza_frente_civico_y_social": "ALIANZA FRENTE CIVICO Y SOCIAL", "votes_gen": "GEN", "votes_alianza_compromiso_con_san_juan": "ALIANZA COMPROMISO CON SAN JUAN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 42028, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 467}, "n_stations_flagged": 467, "created_at": "2026-06-05T07:39:42.638151", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 41716, "n_distinct_geometry": 1643, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.765, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.59, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Cambiemos", "winner_candidate": "M. Macri", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Frente para la Victoria (FplV)", "margin": 2.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 42028}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9c9497250a454ec1b95e81c309594979", "name": "2023 Paso Intendente/A", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='PASO', cargo='INTENDENTE/A'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_integracion_ciudadana": "INTEGRACION CIUDADANA", "votes_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_trabajadores_unidad": "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE TRABAJADORES - UNIDAD", "votes_principios_y_valores": "PRINCIPIOS Y VALORES", "votes_movimiento_libres_del_sur": "MOVIMIENTO LIBRES DEL SUR", "votes_vocacion_social": "VOCACION SOCIAL", "votes_confianza_publica": "CONFIANZA PUBLICA", "votes_corriente_de_pensamiento_bonaerense": "CORRIENTE DE PENSAMIENTO BONAERENSE", "votes_frente_federal_de_accion_solidaria_de_la_provincia_de_buenos_air": "FRENTE FEDERAL DE ACCION SOLIDARIA DE LA PROVINCIA DE BUENOS AIRES", "votes_liber_ar": "LIBER.AR", "votes_movimiento_de_integracion_federal_mif": "MOVIMIENTO DE INTEGRACION FEDERAL (MIF)", "votes_politica_obrera": "POLITICA OBRERA", "votes_proyecto_joven": "PROYECTO JOVEN", "votes_juntos_por_el_cambio": "JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO", "votes_la_libertad_avanza": "LA LIBERTAD AVANZA", "votes_union_por_la_patria": "UNION POR LA PATRIA", "votes_movimiento_de_avanzada_socialista": "MOVIMIENTO DE AVANZADA SOCIALISTA", "votes_unidad_social": "UNIDAD SOCIAL", "votes_autonomista": "AUTONOMISTA", "votes_celeste_provida": "CELESTE PROVIDA", "votes_esperanza_del_pueblo": "ESPERANZA DEL PUEBLO", "votes_todos_por_buenos_aires": "TODOS POR BUENOS AIRES", "votes_alianza_encuentro_marplatense": "ALIANZA ENCUENTRO MARPLATENSE", "votes_buenos_aires_primero_bap": "BUENOS AIRES PRIMERO (BAP)", "votes_creciendo_juntos": "CRECIENDO JUNTOS", "votes_politica_abierta_para_la_integridad_social": "POLITICA ABIERTA PARA LA INTEGRIDAD SOCIAL", "votes_frente_patriota_federal": "FRENTE PATRIOTA FEDERAL", "votes_justicia_y_dignidad_patriotica": "JUSTICIA Y DIGNIDAD PATRIOTICA", "votes_vecinalismo_por_brandsen": "VECINALISMO POR BRANDSEN", "votes_frente_h_a_c_e_r_por_progreso_social": "FRENTE H.A.C.E.R. POR PROGRESO SOCIAL", "votes_accion_vecinal_gral_villegas": "ACCION VECINAL GRAL VILLEGAS", "votes_unidos_por_casares": "UNIDOS POR CASARES", "votes_baradero_400_anos": "BARADERO 400 A\u00d1OS", "votes_primero_rosales": "PRIMERO ROSALES", "votes_primero_chivilcoy": "PRIMERO CHIVILCOY", "votes_primero_dolores": "PRIMERO DOLORES", "votes_juarez_renace": "JUAREZ RENACE", "votes_encuentro_vecinal_general_rodriguez": "ENCUENTRO VECINAL GENERAL RODRIGUEZ", "votes_crecer": "CRECER", "votes_vecinos_unidos_por_lujan": "VECINOS UNIDOS POR LUJAN", "votes_navarro_renace": "NAVARRO RENACE", "votes_espacio_de_pensamiento_y_accion_epa": "ESPACIO DE PENSAMIENTO Y ACCION -EPA-", "votes_nueva_necochea": "NUEVA NECOCHEA", "votes_agrupacion_comunal_transformadora": "AGRUPACION COMUNAL TRANSFORMADORA", "votes_marcos_paz_tiene_futuro": "MARCOS PAZ TIENE FUTURO", "votes_lincoln_es_futuro": "LINCOLN ES FUTURO", "votes_la_tradicion_lobos": "LA TRADICION LOBOS", "votes_primero_lobos": "PRIMERO LOBOS", "votes_tres_de_febrero_en_accion": "TRES DE FEBRERO EN ACCION", "votes_suipacha_despierta": "SUIPACHA DESPIERTA", "votes_fte_de_izq_y_de_trabajadores_unidad": "FTE DE IZQ. Y DE TRABAJADORES - UNIDAD", "votes_gen": "GEN", "votes_accion_por_villarino": "ACCION POR VILLARINO", "votes_participacion_popular": "PARTICIPACION POPULAR", "votes_libres_del_sur": "LIBRES DEL SUR", "votes_por_una_catamarca_mejor": "POR UNA CATAMARCA MEJOR", "votes_agrupacion_vecinal_24_de_octubre": "AGRUPACION VECINAL 24 DE OCTUBRE", "votes_compromiso_con_vox": "COMPROMISO CON VOX", "votes_construimos_fray_mamerto_esquiu": "CONSTRUIMOS FRAY MAMERTO ESQUIU", "votes_todos_por_saavedra": "TODOS POR SAAVEDRA", "votes_agrupacion_vecinal_puebla_la_costa": "AGRUPACION VECINAL PUEBLA LA COSTA", "votes_de_costa_a_costa": "DE COSTA A COSTA", "votes_peronenses_primero": "PERONENSES PRIMERO", "votes_partido_de_integracion_comunitaria": "PARTIDO DE INTEGRACION COMUNITARIA", "votes_saujil_avanza": "SAUJIL AVANZA", "votes_movimiento_integrador_santarroseno": "MOVIMIENTO INTEGRADOR SANTARROSE\u00d1O", "votes_mov_vecinal_del_pdo_de_tres_arroyos": "MOV. VECINAL DEL PDO DE TRES ARROYOS", "votes_primero_san_nicolas": "PRIMERO SAN NICOLAS", "votes_unidos_por_londres": "UNIDOS POR LONDRES"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 41237, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T07:32:19.880439", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 41224, "n_distinct_geometry": 912, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 41237}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "663a67ce2f784292a197a0f92d12c410", "name": "Argentina 2011 General \u2014 Senadores Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='GENERALES', cargo='SENADORES/AS NACIONALES'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_alianza_union_para_el_desarrollo_social": "Alianza Uni\u00f3n para el Desarrollo Social", "votes_coalicion_civica_afirmacion_para_una_republica_igualitaria_ari": "Coalici\u00f3n C\u00edvica - Afirmaci\u00f3n para una Rep\u00fablica Igualitaria ARI", "votes_alianza_frente_popular": "Alianza Frente Popular", "votes_alianza_compromiso_federal": "Alianza Compromiso Federal", "votes_alianza_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_los_trabajadores": "Alianza Frente de Izquierda y de los Trabajadores", "votes_alianza_frente_amplio_progresista": "Alianza Frente Amplio Progresista", "votes_alianza_frente_para_la_victoria": "Alianza Frente para la Victoria", "votes_union_popular": "Uni\u00f3n Popular", "votes_alianza_frente_primero_jujuy": "Alianza Frente Primero Jujuy", "votes_union_civica_radical": "Uni\u00f3n C\u00edvica Radical", "votes_fortaleza": "Fortaleza", "votes_es_posible": "Es Posible", "votes_partido_obrero": "Partido Obrero", "votes_cruzada_renovadora": "Cruzada Renovadora", "votes_partido_dignidad_ciudadana": "Partido Dignidad Ciudadana", "votes_alianza_frente_renovador_de_la_concordia": "Alianza Frente Renovador de la Concordia", "votes_alianza_frente_encuentro_sur": "Alianza Frente Encuentro Sur", "votes_alianza_frente_para_la_victoria_riojana": "Alianza Frente para la Victoria Riojana", "votes_partido_socialista": "Partido Socialista", "votes_alianza_frente_compromiso_federal": "Alianza Frente Compromiso Federal", "votes_alianza_frente_popular_union_pro": "Alianza Frente Popular Uni\u00f3n Pro", "votes_pro_propuesta_republicana": "Pro-Propuesta Republicana", "votes_alianza_frente_popular_riojano": "Alianza Frente Popular Riojano", "votes_acuerdo_republicano_federal": "Acuerdo Republicano Federal"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 39187, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T07:25:49.399084", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 38857, "n_distinct_geometry": 1974, "quality_index": 3.76, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.749, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.573, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.034, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.544, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Front for Victory (FpV)", "winner_candidate": "Cristina Fern\u00e1ndez de Kirchner", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Broad Progressive Front (FAP)", "margin": 37.31, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 39187}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a7a0225042a54fdaa4215fd9fef01ee5", "name": "Argentina 2019 General \u2014 Gobernador", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2019, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='GENERAL', cargo='GOBERNADOR'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_trabajadores_unidad": "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE TRABAJADORES - UNIDAD", "votes_frente_de_todos": "FRENTE DE TODOS", "votes_juntos_por_el_cambio": "JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO", "votes_frente_nos": "FRENTE NOS", "votes_consenso_federal": "CONSENSO FEDERAL", "votes_gem": "GEM"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 37021, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-06-05T07:19:52.311320", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 34325, "n_distinct_geometry": 140, "quality_index": 3.915, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.779, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.618, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.998, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.053, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.083, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 37021}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "67af7512fe88417aaa7940a808e6f2b3", "name": "Argentina 2019 General \u2014 Intendente", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2019, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='GENERAL', cargo='INTENDENTE'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_frente_nos": "FRENTE NOS", "votes_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_trabajadores_unidad": "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE TRABAJADORES - UNIDAD", "votes_juntos_por_el_cambio": "JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO", "votes_frente_de_todos": "FRENTE DE TODOS", "votes_consenso_federal": "CONSENSO FEDERAL", "votes_convocacion_civica_cambia_san_isidro": "CONVOCACI\u00d3N C\u00cdVICA - CAMBIA SAN ISIDRO", "votes_somos_lujan": "SOMOS LUJAN", "votes_union_vecinal_salliquelo": "UNION VECINAL SALLIQUELO", "votes_unidad_y_accion_por_mar_chiquita": "UNIDAD Y ACCION POR MAR CHIQUITA", "votes_a_toda_costa": "A TODA COSTA", "votes_propin_propuesta_pinamar": "PROPIN-PROPUESTA PINAMAR", "votes_agrupacion_atlantica": "AGRUPACION ATLANTICA", "votes_accion_marplatense_am": "ACCION MARPLATENSE-AM", "votes_movimiento_organizacion_democratica_mode": "MOVIMIENTO ORGANIZACION DEMOCRATICA-MODE", "votes_movimiento_vecinal_de_tres_arroyos_mv": "MOVIMIENTO VECINAL DE TRES ARROYOS-MV", "votes_agrupacion_municipal_ituzaingo_positivo": "AGRUPACI\u00d3N MUNICIPAL ITUZAINGO POSITIVO", "votes_todos_por_bahia": "TODOS POR BAHIA", "votes_bien_comun_por_rosales": "BIEN COMUN POR ROSALES", "votes_accion_por_villarino": "ACCION POR VILLARINO", "votes_agrupacion_compromiso_vecinal": "AGRUPACI\u00d3N COMPROMISO VECINAL", "votes_base_ciudadana": "BASE CIUDADANA", "votes_todos_por_saavedra": "TODOS POR SAAVEDRA", "votes_mision_accion_y_compromiso": "MISI\u00d3N, ACCI\u00d3N Y COMPROMISO", "votes_union_vecinal_de_adolfo_gonzales_chaves": "UNION VECINAL DE ADOLFO GONZALES CHAVES", "votes_union_vecinal_de_balcarce_uvb": "UNION VECINAL DE BALCARCE-UVB", "votes_agrupacion_municipal_primero_lobos": "AGRUPACI\u00d3N MUNICIPAL PRIMERO LOBOS", "votes_frente_patriota": "FRENTE PATRIOTA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 36071, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-06-05T07:13:09.435040", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 33375, "n_distinct_geometry": 133, "quality_index": 3.915, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.779, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.618, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.998, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.053, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.083, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 36071}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "eb49ba24fdfa47f3bbf83b613297f52a", "name": "2015 Paso Intendente", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2015, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='PASO', cargo='INTENDENTE'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_union_del_pueblo_la_plata": "UNION DEL PUEBLO LA PLATA", "votes_movimiento_al_socialismo": "MOVIMIENTO AL SOCIALISMO", "votes_partido_popular": "PARTIDO POPULAR", "votes_todos_por_buenos_aires": "TODOS POR BUENOS AIRES", "votes_patria_grande": "PATRIA GRANDE", "votes_alianza_frente_para_la_victoria": "ALIANZA FRENTE PARA LA VICTORIA", "votes_alianza_progresistas": "ALIANZA PROGRESISTAS", "votes_alianza_compromiso_federal": "ALIANZA COMPROMISO FEDERAL", "votes_mst_movimiento_socialista_de_los_trabajadores": "MST-MOVIMIENTO SOCIALISTA DE LOS TRABAJADORES", "votes_cambiemos_buenos_aires": "CAMBIEMOS BUENOS AIRES", "votes_alianza_frente_popular": "ALIANZA FRENTE POPULAR", "votes_alianza_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_los_trabajadores": "ALIANZA FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE LOS TRABAJADORES", "votes_alianza_unidos_por_una_nueva_alternativa_una": "ALIANZA UNIDOS POR UNA NUEVA ALTERNATIVA (UNA)", "votes_agrupacion_vecinal_union_por_moron": "AGRUPACION VECINAL UNION POR MORON", "votes_accion_ciudadana": "ACCION CIUDADANA", "votes_mirada_amplia_regional": "MIRADA AMPLIA REGIONAL", "votes_mov_amplio_de_trab_y_jubilados_matraju": "MOV. AMPLIO DE TRAB. Y JUBILADOS-MATRAJU", "votes_alianza_frente_marplatense": "ALIANZA FRENTE MARPLATENSE", "votes_crecer": "CRECER", "votes_con_vocacion_por_san_isidro": "CON VOCACION POR SAN ISIDRO", "votes_agr_municipal_de_int_pacea": "AGR.MUNICIPAL DE INT.PACE\ufffdA", "votes_unidad_pacea": "UNIDAD PACE\ufffdA", "votes_renovacion_para_junin": "RENOVACION PARA JUNIN", "votes_union_vecinalista_dignidad_para_todos": "UNION VECINALISTA DIGNIDAD PARA TODOS", "votes_union_vecinal_de_adolfo_gonzales_chaves": "UNION VECINAL DE ADOLFO GONZALES CHAVES", "votes_construccion_vecinal_participativa": "CONSTRUCCION VECINAL PARTICIPATIVA", "votes_unidos_por_necochea": "UNIDOS POR NECOCHEA", "votes_movimiento_union_del_partido_de_pinamar": "MOVIMIENTO UNION DEL PARTIDO DE PINAMAR", "votes_accion_pinamarense_ap": "ACCION PINAMARENSE-AP", "votes_vientos_del_sur_visur": "VIENTOS DEL SUR-VISUR", "votes_propuesta_pinamar_propin": "PROPUESTA PINAMAR-PROPIN", "votes_vecinos_en_accion_pinamar_venap": "VECINOS EN ACCION PINAMAR-VENAP", "votes_encuentro_por_rojas": "ENCUENTRO POR ROJAS", "votes_union_vecinal_salliquelo": "UNION VECINAL SALLIQUELO", "votes_vamos": "VAMOS", "votes_causa_popular_brandsen": "CAUSA POPULAR BRANDSEN", "votes_nueva_alternativa_carmea": "NUEVA ALTERNATIVA CARME\ufffdA", "votes_agr_municipal_de_la_intransigencia_colonense": "AGR.MUNICIPAL DE LA INTRANSIGENCIA COLONENSE", "votes_juntos_por_dorrego": "JUNTOS POR DORREGO", "votes_integracion_vecinalista_rosalea": "INTEGRACION VECINALISTA ROSALE\ufffdA", "votes_una_nueva_oportunidad_suarense_unos": "UNA NUEVA OPORTUNIDAD SUARENSE-UNOS", "votes_somos_rodriguez": "SOMOS RODRIGUEZ", "votes_acuerdo_ciudadano_x_trenque_lauquen": "ACUERDO CIUDADANO X TRENQUE LAUQUEN", "votes_movimiento_vecinal": "MOVIMIENTO VECINAL", "votes_todos_vecinos": "TODOS VECINOS", "votes_accion_por_villarino": "ACCION POR VILLARINO", "votes_nuevo_zarate": "NUEVO ZARATE", "votes_c_unidad_social_y_pol_6_de_diciembre": "C.UNIDAD SOCIAL Y POL. 6 DE DICIEMBRE", "votes_compromiso_pringles": "COMPROMISO PRINGLES"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 34250, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 386}, "n_stations_flagged": 386, "created_at": "2026-06-05T07:07:27.098128", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 34237, "n_distinct_geometry": 782, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.765, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.59, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Cambiemos", "winner_candidate": "M. Macri", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Frente para la Victoria (FplV)", "margin": 2.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 34250}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "aa4ca56ed9764dd596a9dfc3dbf5319f", "name": "Argentina 2013 General \u2014 Concejales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2013, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='GENERAL', cargo='CONCEJAL'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_frente_para_la_victoria": "FRENTE PARA LA VICTORIA", "votes_unidos_por_la_libertad_y_el_trabajo": "UNIDOS POR LA LIBERTAD Y EL TRABAJO", "votes_frente_renovador": "FRENTE RENOVADOR", "votes_frente_progresista_civico_y_social": "FRENTE PROGRESISTA CIVICO Y SOCIAL", "votes_compromiso_federal": "COMPROMISO FEDERAL", "votes_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_los_trabajadores": "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE LOS TRABAJADORES", "votes_union_popular": "UNION POPULAR", "votes_frente_popular_democratico_y_social_podemos": "FRENTE POPULAR DEMOCRATICO Y SOCIAL (PODEMOS)", "votes_frente_social_de_la_provincia_de_buenos_aires": "FRENTE SOCIAL DE LA PROVINCIA DE BUENOS AIRES", "votes_integracion_ciudadana": "INTEGRACION CIUDADANA", "votes_unidos_por_bahia_upb": "UNIDOS POR BAHIA (UPB)", "votes_union_con_fe": "UNION CON FE", "votes_espacio_union_pro": "ESPACIO UNION PRO", "votes_nueva_alternativa_carmena": "NUEVA ALTERNATIVA CARME\u00d1A", "votes_juntos_por_dorrego": "JUNTOS POR DORREGO", "votes_compromiso_pringles": "COMPROMISO PRINGLES", "votes_integracion_vecinalista_rosalena": "INTEGRACION VECINALISTA ROSALE\u00d1A", "votes_una_nueva_oportunidad_suarense": "UNA NUEVA OPORTUNIDAD SUARENSE", "votes_unidad_por_chascomus": "UNIDAD POR CHASCOMUS", "votes_partido_lealtad_y_dignidad_de_la_provincia_de_buenos_aires": "PARTIDO LEALTAD Y DIGNIDAD DE LA PROVINCIA DE BUENOS AIRES", "votes_nuevo_encuentro": "NUEVO ENCUENTRO", "votes_defensa_comunal_de_general_paz": "DEFENSA COMUNAL DE GENERAL PAZ", "votes_accion_marplatense": "ACCION MARPLATENSE", "votes_agrupacion_atlantica": "AGRUPACION ATLANTICA", "votes_construccion_social_participativa": "CONSTRUCCION SOCIAL PARTICIPATIVA", "votes_union_vecinal_de_gonzales_chaves": "UNION VECINAL DE GONZALES CHAVES", "votes_frente_ciudad_nueva": "FRENTE CIUDAD NUEVA", "votes_union_vecinal_conservadora_de_lobos": "UNION VECINAL CONSERVADORA DE LOBOS", "votes_marea_popular": "MAREA POPULAR", "votes_mercedes_independiente_comunal": "MERCEDES INDEPENDIENTE COMUNAL", "votes_movimiento_union_del_partido_de_pinamar": "MOVIMIENTO UNION DEL PARTIDO DE PINAMAR", "votes_propuesta_pinamar_propin": "PROPUESTA PINAMAR PROPIN", "votes_vientos_del_sur_vi_sur": "VIENTOS DEL SUR (VI-SUR)", "votes_juntos_por_quilmes": "JUNTOS POR QUILMES", "votes_rivadavia_primero": "RIVADAVIA PRIMERO", "votes_concordancia_aperturista_saltense": "CONCORDANCIA APERTURISTA SALTENSE", "votes_san_fernando_puede": "SAN FERNANDO PUEDE", "votes_agrupacion_renovacion_san_isidro_a_r_s_i": "AGRUPACION RENOVACION SAN ISIDRO A.R.S.I", "votes_con_vocacion_por_san_isidro": "CON VOCACION POR SAN ISIDRO", "votes_union_vecinalista_dignidad_para_todos": "UNION VECINALISTA DIGNIDAD PARA TODOS", "votes_modelo_vecinal_tenaz": "MODELO VECINAL TENAZ", "votes_accion_comunal_del_partido_de_tigre": "ACCION COMUNAL DEL PARTIDO DE TIGRE", "votes_union_vecinal_del_partido_de_trenque_lauquen": "UNION VECINAL DEL PARTIDO DE TRENQUE LAUQUEN", "votes_movimiento_vecinal_del_partido_de_tres_arroyos": "MOVIMIENTO VECINAL DEL PARTIDO DE TRES ARROYOS", "votes_nuevo_siglo_de_25_de_mayo": "NUEVO SIGLO DE 25 DE MAYO", "votes_todos_vecinos": "TODOS VECINOS", "votes_accion_por_villarino": "ACCION POR VILLARINO", "votes_nuevo_zarate": "NUEVO ZARATE", "votes_1o_tres_lomas": "1\u00ba TRES LOMAS", "votes_corriente_de_unidad_social_y_politica_6_de_diciembre": "CORRIENTE DE UNIDAD SOCIAL Y POLITICA 6 DE DICIEMBRE"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 34008, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 919}, "n_stations_flagged": 919, "created_at": "2026-06-05T07:01:48.908802", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 33995, "n_distinct_geometry": 771, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.953, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.772, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.588, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.742, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.145, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.036, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 34008}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ea74a243446a47b6ae3996346a4eb233", "name": "Argentina 2021 General \u2014 Diputados Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='GENERAL', cargo='DIPUTADOS PROVINCIALES'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_frente_justicialista": "FRENTE JUSTICIALISTA", "votes_frente_encuentro_civico_por_santiago": "FRENTE ENCUENTRO CIVICO POR SANTIAGO", "votes_frente_juntos_por_el_cambio": "FRENTE JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO", "votes_frente_patriotico_laborista": "FRENTE PATRIOTICO LABORISTA", "votes_frente_renovador_y_progresista": "FRENTE RENOVADOR Y PROGRESISTA", "votes_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_trabajadores_unidad": "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE TRABAJADORES UNIDAD", "votes_partido_encuentro_de_la_victoria": "PARTIDO ENCUENTRO DE LA VICTORIA", "votes_frente_cruzada_santiaguena": "FRENTE CRUZADA SANTIAGUE\u00d1A", "votes_frente_crecer": "FRENTE CRECER", "votes_por_un_santiago_obrero": "POR UN SANTIAGO OBRERO", "votes_chaco_cambia_juntos_por_el_cambio": "CHACO CAMBIA + JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO", "votes_frente_de_todos": "FRENTE DE TODOS", "votes_frente_integrador": "FRENTE INTEGRADOR", "votes_del_obrero": "DEL OBRERO", "votes_frente_vamos_con_vos": "FRENTE VAMOS CON VOS", "votes_accion_chaquena": "ACCION CHAQUE\u00d1A", "votes_frente_por_la_educacion_y_el_trabajo": "FRENTE POR LA EDUCACI\u00d3N Y EL TRABAJO", "votes_juntos": "JUNTOS", "votes_avanza_libertad": "AVANZA LIBERTAD", "votes_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_trabajadores_unidad_1": "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE TRABAJADORES - UNIDAD", "votes_union_celeste_y_blanco": "UNION CELESTE Y BLANCO", "votes_vamos_la_rioja": "VAMOS LA RIOJA", "votes_hay_futuro_la_rioja": "HAY FUTURO LA RIOJA", "votes_union_del_centro_democratico": "UNI\u00d3N DEL CENTRO DEMOCR\u00c1TICO", "votes_movimiento_ciudadanos_unidos_por_el_pueblo": "MOVIMIENTO CIUDADANOS UNIDOS POR EL PUEBLO", "votes_fe_frente_de_la_esperanza": "FE - FRENTE DE LA ESPERANZA", "votes_todos_avanzamos": "TODOS AVANZAMOS", "votes_frente_amplio_de_izquierda_nacional_y_popular": "FRENTE AMPLIO DE IZQUIERDA NACIONAL Y POPULAR", "votes_unidos_por_mi_gente": "UNIDOS POR MI GENTE", "votes_frop": "FROP", "votes_rioja_solidaria": "RIOJA SOLIDARIA", "votes_frente_vecinalista_del_tercer_sector": "FRENTE VECINALISTA DEL TERCER SECTOR", "votes_nex": "NEX", "votes_nos": "NOS", "votes_unidos_por_sanagasta": "UNIDOS POR SANAGASTA", "votes_convergencia_riojana": "CONVERGENCIA RIOJANA", "votes_volver_a_creer": "VOLVER A CREER", "votes_frente_federal": "FRENTE FEDERAL", "votes_mo_te_po": "MO.TE.PO.", "votes_integracion_y_esperanza_ciudadana": "INTEGRACI\u00d3N Y ESPERANZA CIUDADANA", "votes_es_posible": "ES POSIBLE", "votes_cambia_mendoza": "CAMBIA MENDOZA", "votes_verde": "VERDE", "votes_vamos_mendocinos": "VAMOS ! MENDOCINOS", "votes_de_los_jubilados": "DE LOS JUBILADOS", "votes_federal": "FEDERAL", "votes_compromiso_federal": "COMPROMISO FEDERAL", "votes_juntos_por_el_cambio": "JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO", "votes_frente_amplio_catamarqueno": "FRENTE AMPLIO CATAMARQUE\u00d1O", "votes_con_vos_podemos": "CON VOS PODEMOS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 29614, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T06:56:57.064686", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 29553, "n_distinct_geometry": 1134, "quality_index": 3.934, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.94, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.796, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.639, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.621, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 29614}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e5c0d84650ab4f1eba685c9cf183eefa", "name": "Afghanistan 2019 Presidential \u2014 IEC/ECC audit overlay", "metadata": {"country": "Afghanistan", "year": 2019, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Station-level audit overlay for the 2019 Afghan presidential election (28 September 2019). Built from Colin Cookman's ``ps_key_2019.csv`` (transcribed from IEC's public audit-list and ECC special-audit adjudications). One row per IEC-gazetted polling station (29,586 total); ``result_status`` derived from the IEC + ECC decision columns via first-match-wins precedence (invalidated > recount > quarantined > final). Counts: 25,616 final, 1,373 quarantined, 298 recount, 2,299 IEC-invalidated. Per-row", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_total": "Total (overlay placeholder)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {"final": "final", "quarantined": "quarantined", "recount": "recount", "excluded": "excluded"}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 29586, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T06:51:57.456362", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.728, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.152, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.329, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.162, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.728, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.432, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.055, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.514, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.005, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.251, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.236, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.155, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.329, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.329, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.162, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.162, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.175, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.175, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.487, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.487, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.211, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.211, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.674, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"final": 25616, "excluded": 2299, "recount": 298, "quarantined": 1373}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": true}, {"id": "ab82386436784291ba97672e24a16f32", "name": "2015 Paso Senadores Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='PASO', cargo='SENADORES NACIONALES'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_alianza_frente_para_la_victoria": "ALIANZA FRENTE PARA LA VICTORIA", "votes_alianza_unidos_por_una_nueva_alternativa_una": "ALIANZA UNIDOS POR UNA NUEVA ALTERNATIVA (UNA)", "votes_alianza_encuentro_por_corrientes": "ALIANZA ENCUENTRO POR CORRIENTES", "votes_alianza_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_los_trabajadores": "ALIANZA FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE LOS TRABAJADORES", "votes_mst_movimiento_socialista_de_los_trabajadores": "MST-MOVIMIENTO SOCIALISTA DE LOS TRABAJADORES", "votes_partido_del_trabajo_y_del_pueblo": "PARTIDO DEL TRABAJO Y DEL PUEBLO", "votes_alianza_compromiso_federal": "ALIANZA COMPROMISO FEDERAL", "votes_alianza_progresistas": "ALIANZA PROGRESISTAS", "votes_mst_nueva_izquierda": "MST - NUEVA IZQUIERDA", "votes_movimiento_al_socialismo": "MOVIMIENTO AL SOCIALISMO", "votes_alianza_union_por_cordoba": "ALIANZA UNION POR CORDOBA", "votes_alianza_cambiemos": "ALIANZA CAMBIEMOS", "votes_union_celeste_y_blanco": "UNION CELESTE Y BLANCO", "votes_es_posible": "ES POSIBLE", "votes_alianza_frente_amplio_podemos": "ALIANZA FRENTE AMPLIO PODEMOS", "votes_alianza_frente_tercera_posicion": "ALIANZA FRENTE TERCERA POSICION", "votes_obrero": "OBRERO", "votes_alianza_frente_civico_y_social": "ALIANZA FRENTE CIVICO Y SOCIAL", "votes_alianza_cambiemos_chubut": "ALIANZA CAMBIEMOS CHUBUT", "votes_movimiento_independiente_justicia_y_dignidad": "MOVIMIENTO INDEPENDIENTE JUSTICIA Y DIGNIDAD", "votes_partido_popular": "PARTIDO POPULAR", "votes_de_accion_chubutense": "DE ACCION CHUBUTENSE", "votes_movimiento_polo_social_la_tercera_posicion_de_la_gente": "MOVIMIENTO POLO SOCIAL LA TERCERA POSICION DE LA GENTE", "votes_alianza_frente_progresista_civico_y_social": "ALIANZA FRENTE PROGRESISTA CIVICO Y SOCIAL", "votes_unite_por_la_libertad_y_la_dignidad": "UNITE POR LA LIBERTAD Y LA DIGNIDAD", "votes_alianza_frente_union_chubut_somos_todos": "ALIANZA FRENTE UNION CHUBUT SOMOS TODOS", "votes_del_campo_popular": "DEL CAMPO POPULAR", "votes_alianza_frente_popular": "ALIANZA FRENTE POPULAR", "votes_instrumento_electoral_por_la_unidad_popular": "INSTRUMENTO ELECTORAL POR LA UNIDAD POPULAR", "votes_alianza_frente_renovador_federal_por_la_esperanza": "ALIANZA FRENTE RENOVADOR FEDERAL POR LA ESPERANZA", "votes_alianza_cambiemos_mendoza": "ALIANZA CAMBIEMOS MENDOZA", "votes_alianza_frente_cambiemos": "ALIANZA FRENTE CAMBIEMOS", "votes_socialista_autentico": "SOCIALISTA AUTENTICO", "votes_partido_movimiento_de_participacion_ciudadana": "PARTIDO MOVIMIENTO DE PARTICIPACION CIUDADANA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 29018, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 27}, "n_stations_flagged": 27, "created_at": "2026-06-05T06:47:21.663523", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 29013, "n_distinct_geometry": 1928, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.765, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.59, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Cambiemos", "winner_candidate": "M. Macri", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Frente para la Victoria (FplV)", "margin": 2.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 29018}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6e5dc210c5bc4b7e964b7b651e5ab872", "name": "Argentina 2017 General \u2014 Diputados Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2017, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='GENERAL', cargo='DIPUTADO PROVINCIAL'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_frente_justicialista": "FRENTE JUSTICIALISTA", "votes_unidad_ciudadana": "UNIDAD CIUDADANA", "votes_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_los_trabajadores": "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE LOS TRABAJADORES", "votes_1pais": "1PAIS", "votes_cambiemos_buenos_aires": "CAMBIEMOS BUENOS AIRES", "votes_cambia_mendoza": "CAMBIA MENDOZA", "votes_intransigente": "INTRANSIGENTE", "votes_somos_mendoza": "SOMOS MENDOZA", "votes_compromiso_federal": "COMPROMISO FEDERAL", "votes_movimiento_norte_grande": "MOVIMIENTO NORTE GRANDE", "votes_movimiento_integracion_latinoamericana_de_expresion_social": "MOVIMIENTO INTEGRACION LATINOAMERICANA DE EXPRESION SOCIAL", "votes_partido_primero_jujuy": "PARTIDO PRIMERO JUJUY", "votes_movimiento_comunitario_pluricultural": "MOVIMIENTO COMUNITARIO PLURICULTURAL", "votes_partido_por_la_dignidad_del_pueblo": "PARTIDO POR LA DIGNIDAD DEL PUEBLO", "votes_podemos_jujuy": "PODEMOS JUJUY", "votes_frente_unidad_ciudadana": "FRENTE UNIDAD CIUDADANA", "votes_fente_cambia_jujuy": "FENTE CAMBIA JUJUY", "votes_nacionalista_constitucional_unir": "NACIONALISTA CONSTITUCIONAL -  UNIR", "votes_movimiento_socialista_de_los_trabajadores": "MOVIMIENTO SOCIALISTA DE LOS TRABAJADORES", "votes_patria_grande": "PATRIA GRANDE", "votes_izquierda_al_frente_por_el_socialismo": "IZQUIERDA AL FRENTE POR EL SOCIALISMO", "votes_obrero": "OBRERO", "votes_frente_civico_y_social_cambiemos": "FRENTE CIVICO Y SOCIAL - CAMBIEMOS", "votes_frente_de_unidad_ciudadana": "FRENTE DE UNIDAD CIUDADANA", "votes_frente_justicialista_para_la_victoria": "FRENTE JUSTICIALISTA PARA LA VICTORIA", "votes_gem_catamarca": "GEM CATAMARCA", "votes_avanzar_y_cambiemos_por_san_luis": "AVANZAR Y CAMBIEMOS POR SAN LUIS", "votes_frente_unidad_justicialista_san_luis": "FRENTE UNIDAD JUSTICIALISTA SAN LUIS", "votes_partido_san_luis_somos_todos": "PARTIDO SAN LUIS SOMOS TODOS", "votes_partido_proyecto_clase_media_proclame": "PARTIDO PROYECTO CLASE MEDIA-PROCLAME"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 25932, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T06:44:04.821911", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 25726, "n_distinct_geometry": 1310, "quality_index": 3.926, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.953, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.751, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.609, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.77, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.084, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.375, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.037, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.609, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.577, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.411, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.411, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 25932}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cdb97ad9cd1449218156d636fe594f29", "name": "2015 Paso Diputados Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2015, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='PASO', cargo='DIPUTADOS PROVINCIALES'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_alianza_frente_union_chubut_somos_todos": "ALIANZA FRENTE UNION CHUBUT SOMOS TODOS", "votes_union_popular": "UNION POPULAR", "votes_alianza_cambiemos": "ALIANZA CAMBIEMOS", "votes_alianza_frente_tercera_posicion": "ALIANZA FRENTE TERCERA POSICION", "votes_alianza_cambiemos_chubut": "ALIANZA CAMBIEMOS CHUBUT", "votes_alianza_frente_para_la_victoria": "ALIANZA FRENTE PARA LA VICTORIA", "votes_alianza_compromiso_federal": "ALIANZA COMPROMISO FEDERAL", "votes_de_accion_chubutense": "DE ACCION CHUBUTENSE", "votes_gen": "GEN", "votes_partido_popular": "PARTIDO POPULAR", "votes_alianza_unidos_por_una_nueva_alternativa_una": "ALIANZA UNIDOS POR UNA NUEVA ALTERNATIVA (UNA)", "votes_mst_movimiento_socialista_de_los_trabajadores": "MST-MOVIMIENTO SOCIALISTA DE LOS TRABAJADORES", "votes_movimiento_independiente_justicia_y_dignidad": "MOVIMIENTO INDEPENDIENTE JUSTICIA Y DIGNIDAD", "votes_movimiento_polo_social_la_tercera_posicion_de_la_gente": "MOVIMIENTO POLO SOCIAL LA TERCERA POSICION DE LA GENTE", "votes_partido_del_trabajo_y_del_pueblo": "PARTIDO DEL TRABAJO Y DEL PUEBLO", "votes_obrero": "OBRERO", "votes_movimiento_libres_del_sur": "MOVIMIENTO LIBRES DEL SUR", "votes_alianza_progresistas": "ALIANZA PROGRESISTAS", "votes_patria_grande": "PATRIA GRANDE", "votes_nueva_izquierda": "NUEVA IZQUIERDA", "votes_proclame": "PROCLAME", "votes_frente_mxc": "FRENTE MXC", "votes_alianza_frente_popular": "ALIANZA FRENTE POPULAR", "votes_cambiemos_buenos_aires": "CAMBIEMOS BUENOS AIRES", "votes_alianza_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_los_trabajadores": "ALIANZA FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE LOS TRABAJADORES", "votes_mov_amplio_de_trab_y_jubilados_matraju": "MOV. AMPLIO DE TRAB. Y JUBILADOS-MATRAJU", "votes_movimiento_al_socialismo": "MOVIMIENTO AL SOCIALISMO", "votes_todos_por_buenos_aires": "TODOS POR BUENOS AIRES", "votes_socialista": "SOCIALISTA", "votes_alianza_frente_civico_y_social": "ALIANZA FRENTE CIVICO Y SOCIAL", "votes_movimiento_de_accion_vecinal": "MOVIMIENTO DE ACCION VECINAL", "votes_partido_union_vecinal_prov": "PARTIDO UNION VECINAL PROV.", "votes_instrumento_electoral": "INSTRUMENTO ELECTORAL", "votes_movipro": "MOVIPRO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 22697, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 203}, "n_stations_flagged": 203, "created_at": "2026-06-05T06:42:40.630520", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 22577, "n_distinct_geometry": 804, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.765, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.59, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Cambiemos", "winner_candidate": "M. Macri", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Frente para la Victoria (FplV)", "margin": 2.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 22697}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "03b2f6e57d9b4d50b20dc1c912c08ee3", "name": "2023 Paso Diputados/As Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='PASO', cargo='DIPUTADOS/AS PROVINCIALES'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_movimiento_de_avanzada_socialista": "MOVIMIENTO DE AVANZADA SOCIALISTA", "votes_movimiento_libres_del_sur": "MOVIMIENTO LIBRES DEL SUR", "votes_politica_obrera": "POLITICA OBRERA", "votes_proyecto_joven": "PROYECTO JOVEN", "votes_frente_patriota_federal": "FRENTE PATRIOTA FEDERAL", "votes_liber_ar": "LIBER.AR", "votes_juntos_por_el_cambio": "JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO", "votes_union_por_la_patria": "UNION POR LA PATRIA", "votes_la_libertad_avanza": "LA LIBERTAD AVANZA", "votes_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_trabajadores_unidad": "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE TRABAJADORES - UNIDAD", "votes_principios_y_valores": "PRINCIPIOS Y VALORES", "votes_politica_abierta_para_la_integridad_social": "POLITICA ABIERTA PARA LA INTEGRIDAD SOCIAL", "votes_movimiento_de_integracion_federal_mif": "MOVIMIENTO DE INTEGRACION FEDERAL (MIF)", "votes_corriente_de_pensamiento_bonaerense": "CORRIENTE DE PENSAMIENTO BONAERENSE", "votes_buenos_aires_primero_bap": "BUENOS AIRES PRIMERO (BAP)", "votes_todos_por_buenos_aires": "TODOS POR BUENOS AIRES", "votes_frente_federal_de_accion_solidaria_de_la_provincia_de_buenos_air": "FRENTE FEDERAL DE ACCION SOLIDARIA DE LA PROVINCIA DE BUENOS AIRES", "votes_confianza_publica": "CONFIANZA PUBLICA", "votes_vocacion_social": "VOCACION SOCIAL", "votes_unidad_social": "UNIDAD SOCIAL", "votes_justicia_y_dignidad_patriotica": "JUSTICIA Y DIGNIDAD PATRIOTICA", "votes_esperanza_del_pueblo": "ESPERANZA DEL PUEBLO", "votes_celeste_provida": "CELESTE PROVIDA", "votes_por_santa_cruz": "POR SANTA CRUZ", "votes_cambia_santa_cruz": "CAMBIA SANTA CRUZ", "votes_movimiento_al_socialismo": "MOVIMIENTO AL SOCIALISMO", "votes_libres_del_sur": "LIBRES DEL SUR", "votes_fte_de_izq_y_de_trabajadores_unidad": "FTE DE IZQ. Y DE TRABAJADORES - UNIDAD"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 22418, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T06:40:33.942054", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 22410, "n_distinct_geometry": 553, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 22418}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b0813889a8db4b9ab0258972b3aaaecc", "name": "Argentina 2023 General \u2014 Diputados Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='GENERAL', cargo='DIPUTADO PROVINCIAL'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_union_por_la_patria": "UNION POR LA PATRIA", "votes_juntos_por_el_cambio": "JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO", "votes_la_libertad_avanza": "LA LIBERTAD AVANZA", "votes_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_trabajadores_unidad": "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE TRABAJADORES - UNIDAD"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21507, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T06:39:21.645063", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 21499, "n_distinct_geometry": 508, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21507}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1e707b3e54fa4cf69f56d2fcb2f99bc1", "name": "2015 Paso Senadores Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2015, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='PASO', cargo='SENADORES PROVINCIALES'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_mst_movimiento_socialista_de_los_trabajadores": "MST-MOVIMIENTO SOCIALISTA DE LOS TRABAJADORES", "votes_alianza_frente_popular": "ALIANZA FRENTE POPULAR", "votes_todos_por_buenos_aires": "TODOS POR BUENOS AIRES", "votes_movimiento_al_socialismo": "MOVIMIENTO AL SOCIALISMO", "votes_alianza_progresistas": "ALIANZA PROGRESISTAS", "votes_partido_popular": "PARTIDO POPULAR", "votes_alianza_unidos_por_una_nueva_alternativa_una": "ALIANZA UNIDOS POR UNA NUEVA ALTERNATIVA (UNA)", "votes_cambiemos_buenos_aires": "CAMBIEMOS BUENOS AIRES", "votes_alianza_compromiso_federal": "ALIANZA COMPROMISO FEDERAL", "votes_patria_grande": "PATRIA GRANDE", "votes_alianza_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_los_trabajadores": "ALIANZA FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE LOS TRABAJADORES", "votes_alianza_frente_para_la_victoria": "ALIANZA FRENTE PARA LA VICTORIA", "votes_alianza_cambiemos": "ALIANZA CAMBIEMOS", "votes_nueva_izquierda": "NUEVA IZQUIERDA", "votes_socialista": "SOCIALISTA", "votes_union_popular": "UNION POPULAR", "votes_movimiento_libres_del_sur": "MOVIMIENTO LIBRES DEL SUR", "votes_movipro": "MOVIPRO", "votes_frente_mxc": "FRENTE MXC", "votes_alianza_frente_tercera_posicion": "ALIANZA FRENTE TERCERA POSICION", "votes_alianza_frente_civico_y_social": "ALIANZA FRENTE CIVICO Y SOCIAL", "votes_obrero": "OBRERO", "votes_gen": "GEN", "votes_movimiento_de_accion_vecinal": "MOVIMIENTO DE ACCION VECINAL", "votes_instrumento_electoral": "INSTRUMENTO ELECTORAL", "votes_partido_union_vecinal_prov": "PARTIDO UNION VECINAL PROV."}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21402, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 221}, "n_stations_flagged": 221, "created_at": "2026-06-05T06:38:07.247453", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 21208, "n_distinct_geometry": 898, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.765, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.59, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Cambiemos", "winner_candidate": "M. Macri", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Frente para la Victoria (FplV)", "margin": 2.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21402}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "29c5aca1d8fe4ab98b0293b21383df87", "name": "Argentina 2011 General \u2014 Diputados Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2011, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='GENERALES', cargo='DIPUTADOS/AS PROVINCIALES'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_frente_entrerriano_federal": "Frente Entrerriano Federal", "votes_partido_popular_de_la_reconstruccion": "Partido Popular de la Reconstrucci\u00f3n", "votes_pro_propuesta_republicana": "Pro-Propuesta Republicana", "votes_nueva_izquierda": "Nueva Izquierda", "votes_alianza_frente_justicialista_para_la_victoria": "Alianza Frente Justicialista para la Victoria", "votes_gen": "GEN", "votes_frente_progresista_civ_y_soc": "Frente Progresista Civ. y Soc.", "votes_union_popular": "Uni\u00f3n Popular", "votes_union_y_libertad": "Uni\u00f3n y Libertad", "votes_alianza_frente_amplio_progresista": "Alianza Frente Amplio Progresista", "votes_alianza_frente_para_la_victoria": "Alianza Frente para la Victoria", "votes_alianza_frente_primero_jujuy": "Alianza Frente Primero Jujuy", "votes_alianza_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_los_trabajadores": "Alianza Frente de Izquierda y de los Trabajadores", "votes_alianza_union_para_el_desarrollo_social": "Alianza Uni\u00f3n para el Desarrollo Social", "votes_frente_unidos_por_san_luis": "Frente Unidos por San Luis", "votes_partido_nueva_generacion": "Partido Nueva Generaci\u00f3n", "votes_partido_democ_independiente": "Partido Democ. Independiente", "votes_alianza_compromiso_federal": "Alianza Compromiso Federal", "votes_mo_v_i_pro": "MO.V.I.PRO.", "votes_fuerza_nueva": "Fuerza Nueva", "votes_alianza_frente_popular": "Alianza Frente Popular", "votes_nuevo_encuentro": "Nuevo Encuentro", "votes_coalicion_civica_afirmacion_para_una_republica_igualitaria_ari": "Coalici\u00f3n C\u00edvica - Afirmaci\u00f3n para una Rep\u00fablica Igualitaria ARI"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20608, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T06:36:52.992310", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 20259, "n_distinct_geometry": 692, "quality_index": 3.76, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.749, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.573, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.034, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.544, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Front for Victory (FpV)", "winner_candidate": "Cristina Fern\u00e1ndez de Kirchner", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Broad Progressive Front (FAP)", "margin": 37.31, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 20608}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c5bf97c053c54678b4ab4101cb0a6996", "name": "Argentina 2021 General \u2014 Diputados de la Ciudad (CABA)", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='GENERAL', cargo='DIPUTADOS/AS DE LA CIUDAD'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_juntos_por_el_cambio": "JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO", "votes_frente_de_todos": "FRENTE DE TODOS", "votes_la_libertad_avanza": "LA LIBERTAD AVANZA", "votes_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_trabajadores_unidad": "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE TRABAJADORES - UNIDAD", "votes_autodeterminacion_y_libertad": "AUTODETERMINACI\u00d3N Y LIBERTAD"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8531, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T06:08:52.066167", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 8531, "n_distinct_geometry": 148, "quality_index": 3.934, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.94, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.796, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.639, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.621, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8531}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2c5545aa7a624867835a5e3bec4dd77b", "name": "Argentina 2023 General \u2014 Concejales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='GENERAL', cargo='CONCEJAL'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_union_por_la_patria": "UNION POR LA PATRIA", "votes_juntos_por_el_cambio": "JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO", "votes_la_libertad_avanza": "LA LIBERTAD AVANZA", "votes_frente_de_izquierda_y_de_trabajadores_unidad": "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y DE TRABAJADORES - UNIDAD", "votes_gen": "GEN", "votes_movimiento_integrador_santarroseno": "MOVIMIENTO INTEGRADOR SANTARROSE\u00d1O", "votes_podemos_santa_rosa": "PODEMOS SANTA ROSA", "votes_construimos_fray_mamerto_esquiu": "CONSTRUIMOS FRAY MAMERTO ESQUIU", "votes_compromiso_con_vos": "COMPROMISO CON VOS", "votes_partido_de_integracion_comunitaria": "PARTIDO DE INTEGRACION COMUNITARIA", "votes_saujil_avanza": "SAUJIL AVANZA", "votes_unidos_por_londres": "UNIDOS POR LONDRES", "votes_participacion_popular": "PARTICIPACION POPULAR", "votes_por_santa_cruz": "POR SANTA CRUZ", "votes_juntos_por_el_cambio_caleta_olivia": "JUNTOS POR EL CAMBIO CALETA OLIVIA", "votes_juntos_por_pico_truncado": "JUNTOS POR PICO TRUNCADO", "votes_juntos_por_las_heras": "JUNTOS POR LAS HERAS", "votes_juntos_por_gregores": "JUNTOS POR GREGORES", "votes_primero_de_diciembre": "PRIMERO DE DICIEMBRE", "votes_encuentro_vecinal_el_chalten": "ENCUENTRO VECINAL EL CHALTEN", "votes_juntos_por_calafate": "JUNTOS POR CALAFATE", "votes_juntos_por_rio_gallegos": "JUNTOS POR RIO GALLEGOS", "votes_reconstruccion_social": "RECONSTRUCCION SOCIAL", "votes_juntos_por_rio_turbio": "JUNTOS POR RIO TURBIO", "votes_juntos_por_28": "JUNTOS POR 28"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1887, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T06:07:20.076961", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 1887, "n_distinct_geometry": 156, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1887}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e74ab835c2204f46af62c51195cb2d17", "name": "2015 Paso Diputados/As Provinciales Proporcionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2015, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='PASO', cargo='DIPUTADOS/AS PROVINCIALES PROPORCIONALES'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_nueva_izquierda": "NUEVA IZQUIERDA", "votes_cruzada_renovadora": "CRUZADA RENOVADORA", "votes_alianza_frente_para_la_victoria": "ALIANZA FRENTE PARA LA VICTORIA", "votes_alianza_compromiso_con_san_juan": "ALIANZA COMPROMISO CON SAN JUAN", "votes_juntos_por_san_juan": "JUNTOS POR SAN JUAN", "votes_alianza_frente_progresista_popular": "ALIANZA FRENTE PROGRESISTA POPULAR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1584, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-06-05T06:06:02.382565", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 1584, "n_distinct_geometry": 136, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.765, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.59, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Cambiemos", "winner_candidate": "M. Macri", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Frente para la Victoria (FplV)", "margin": 2.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1584}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7fb441334c394a1ea6421d2da43403c2", "name": "2015 Paso Diputado/As Provinciales Departamentales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2015, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='PASO', cargo='DIPUTADO/AS PROVINCIALES DEPARTAMENTALES'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_alianza_frente_progresista_popular": "ALIANZA FRENTE PROGRESISTA POPULAR", "votes_nueva_izquierda": "NUEVA IZQUIERDA", "votes_alianza_frente_para_la_victoria": "ALIANZA FRENTE PARA LA VICTORIA", "votes_juntos_por_san_juan": "JUNTOS POR SAN JUAN", "votes_cruzada_renovadora": "CRUZADA RENOVADORA", "votes_alianza_compromiso_con_san_juan": "ALIANZA COMPROMISO CON SAN JUAN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1584, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 11}, "n_stations_flagged": 11, "created_at": "2026-06-05T06:04:15.660844", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 1584, "n_distinct_geometry": 136, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.765, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.59, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Cambiemos", "winner_candidate": "M. Macri", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Frente para la Victoria (FplV)", "margin": 2.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1584}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f99427437695413c959c2ae89028794f", "name": "Argentina 2015 General \u2014 Diputados Provinciales (proporcionales) [San Juan (proportional seat ballot)]", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2015, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='GENERALES', cargo='DIPUTADOS/AS PROVINCIALES PROPORCIONALES'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_alianza_frente_progresista_popular": "ALIANZA FRENTE PROGRESISTA POPULAR", "votes_alianza_frente_para_la_victoria": "ALIANZA FRENTE PARA LA VICTORIA", "votes_alianza_compromiso_con_san_juan": "ALIANZA COMPROMISO CON SAN JUAN", "votes_juntos_por_san_juan": "JUNTOS POR SAN JUAN", "votes_cruzada_renovadora": "CRUZADA RENOVADORA", "votes_nueva_izquierda": "NUEVA IZQUIERDA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1553, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T06:01:13.982893", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 1553, "n_distinct_geometry": 136, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.765, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.59, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Cambiemos", "winner_candidate": "M. Macri", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Frente para la Victoria (FplV)", "margin": 2.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1553}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "da9d9e87a46f4fc49af150df6e943428", "name": "Argentina 2015 General \u2014 Diputados Provinciales (departamentales) [San Juan (departmental seat ballot)]", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2015, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='GENERALES', cargo='DIPUTADO/AS PROVINCIALES DEPARTAMENTALES'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_alianza_frente_para_la_victoria": "ALIANZA FRENTE PARA LA VICTORIA", "votes_alianza_compromiso_con_san_juan": "ALIANZA COMPROMISO CON SAN JUAN", "votes_juntos_por_san_juan": "JUNTOS POR SAN JUAN", "votes_cruzada_renovadora": "CRUZADA RENOVADORA", "votes_nueva_izquierda": "NUEVA IZQUIERDA", "votes_alianza_frente_progresista_popular": "ALIANZA FRENTE PROGRESISTA POPULAR"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1553, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T06:00:03.035512", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 1553, "n_distinct_geometry": 136, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.765, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.59, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Cambiemos", "winner_candidate": "M. Macri", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Frente para la Victoria (FplV)", "margin": 2.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1553}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "97ccfb8964864005bbc718d899543844", "name": "Finland 2025 County", "metadata": {"country": "Finland", "year": 2025, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ministry of Justice canonical party results, polling-district level. Source files: av-2025_taat_maa.csv + av-2025_tpat_maa.csv. Yle's vaalit.yle.fi/tulospalvelu re-publishes these same numbers but only down to municipality, so the ministry CSV is the canonical source.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_suomen_sosialidemokraattinen_puolue": "SDP \u2014 Suomen Sosialidemokraattinen Puolue", "votes_kansallinen_kokoomus": "KOK \u2014 Kansallinen Kokoomus", "votes_suomen_keskusta": "KESK \u2014 Suomen Keskusta", "votes_vasemmistoliitto": "VAS \u2014 Vasemmistoliitto", "votes_vihre_liitto": "VIHR \u2014 Vihre\u00e4 liitto", "votes_perussuomalaiset": "PS \u2014 Perussuomalaiset", "votes_suomen_ruotsalainen_kansanpuolue": "RKP \u2014 Suomen ruotsalainen kansanpuolue", "votes_suomen_kristillisdemokraatit_kd": "KD \u2014 Suomen Kristillisdemokraatit (KD)", "votes_liike_nyt": "LIIK \u2014 Liike Nyt", "votes_vapauden_liitto": "VL \u2014 Vapauden liitto", "votes_liberaalipuolue_vapaus_valita": "LIBE \u2014 Liberaalipuolue - Vapaus valita", "votes_lapin_sitoutumattomat_yhteislista": "LAPSIT \u2014 Lapin Sitoutumattomat - yhteislista", "votes_uudenmaan_sitoutumattomien_keski_uudenmaan_yhteislista": "KEUSIT \u2014 Uudenmaan sitoutumattomien Keski-Uudenmaan yhteislista", "votes_suomen_kommunistinen_puolue": "SKP \u2014 Suomen Kommunistinen Puolue", "votes_pienten_kuntien_puolesta_yhteislista": "YL1 \u2014 Pienten kuntien puolesta -yhteislista", "votes_el_inoikeuspuolue": "EOP \u2014 El\u00e4inoikeuspuolue", "votes_valta_kuuluu_kansalle": "VKK \u2014 Valta kuuluu kansalle", "votes_juha_m_kimartti": "E2405 \u2014 Juha M\u00e4kimartti", "votes_mustasaaren_suomenkielisten_kunnallisj_rjest_ry_n_yhteislista": "MSK ry \u2014 Mustasaaren Suomenkielisten kunnallisj\u00e4rjest\u00f6 ry:n yhteislista", "votes_kristallipuolue": "KRIP \u2014 Kristallipuolue", "votes_pirkanmaan_sitoutumattomat_yhteislista_pirsit": "PirSit \u2014 Pirkanmaan Sitoutumattomat yhteislista, PirSit", "votes_tapani_karvinen": "E2514 \u2014 Tapani Karvinen", "votes_esko_j_kk": "E2473 \u2014 Esko J\u00e4kk\u00f6", "votes_avoin_puolue": "AP \u2014 Avoin Puolue", "votes_viivi_rantaj_sk": "E2474 \u2014 Viivi Rantaj\u00e4\u00e4sk\u00f6", "votes_timo_virtanen": "E2717 \u2014 Timo Virtanen", "votes_veli_matti_surakka": "E2335 \u2014 Veli-Matti Surakka", "votes_jari_hovinen": "E2525 \u2014 Jari Hovinen"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1492, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-05T05:58:19.982726", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.863, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.852, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.808, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.549, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.263, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.566, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.707, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.707, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.031, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.031, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1492}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9608fdddf4ef4c418931b3383a1283a5", "name": "Argentina 2011 General \u2014 Diputados Provinciales (proporcionales) [San Juan (proportional seat ballot)]", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2011, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='GENERALES', cargo='DIPUTADOS/AS PROVINCIALES PROPORCIONALES'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_todos_por_san_juan": "Todos por San Juan", "votes_union_produccion_y_trabajo": "Uni\u00f3n, Producci\u00f3n y Trabajo", "votes_alianza_frente_para_la_victoria": "Alianza Frente para la Victoria", "votes_frente_opositor": "Frente Opositor", "votes_partido_dignidad_ciudadana": "Partido Dignidad Ciudadana"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1386, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T05:55:52.124854", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 1386, "n_distinct_geometry": 134, "quality_index": 3.76, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.749, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.573, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.034, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.544, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Front for Victory (FpV)", "winner_candidate": "Cristina Fern\u00e1ndez de Kirchner", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Broad Progressive Front (FAP)", "margin": 37.31, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1386}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e8772f2d78cb496988a0af57d3bf1a0a", "name": "Argentina 2011 General \u2014 Diputados Provinciales (departamentales) [San Juan (departmental seat ballot)]", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2011, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='GENERALES', cargo='DIPUTADO/AS PROVINCIALES DEPARTAMENTALES'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_alianza_frente_para_la_victoria": "Alianza Frente para la Victoria", "votes_partido_dignidad_ciudadana": "Partido Dignidad Ciudadana", "votes_union_produccion_y_trabajo": "Uni\u00f3n, Producci\u00f3n y Trabajo", "votes_todos_por_san_juan": "Todos por San Juan", "votes_frente_opositor": "Frente Opositor"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1386, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T05:55:31.971966", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 1386, "n_distinct_geometry": 134, "quality_index": 3.76, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.749, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.573, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.034, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.544, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Front for Victory (FpV)", "winner_candidate": "Cristina Fern\u00e1ndez de Kirchner", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Broad Progressive Front (FAP)", "margin": 37.31, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1386}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cf11c9b759f1416cb5455bb6ea3d9db0", "name": "Argentina 2015 General \u2014 Diputados Provinciales (distrito \u00fanico) [Santa Cruz (single-district)]", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2015, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='GENERALES', cargo='DIPUTADOS/AS PROVINCIALES DISTRITO \u00daNICO'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_frente_de_izquierda_y_los_trabajadores": "FRENTE DE IZQUIERDA Y LOS TRABAJADORES", "votes_frente_para_la_victoria_santacrucena": "FRENTE PARA LA VICTORIA SANTACRUCE\u00d1A", "votes_mst_movimiento_socialista_de_los_trabajadores": "MST-MOVIMIENTO SOCIALISTA DE LOS TRABAJADORES", "votes_union_para_vivir_mejor": "UNION PARA VIVIR MEJOR", "votes_movimiento_al_socialismo": "MOVIMIENTO AL SOCIALISMO"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 783, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T05:55:21.742326", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 783, "n_distinct_geometry": 33, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.765, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.59, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Cambiemos", "winner_candidate": "M. Macri", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Frente para la Victoria (FplV)", "margin": 2.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 783}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1a5d3fe965a3411687982d9c89b380ca", "name": "Argentina 2011 General \u2014 Diputados Provinciales (distrito \u00fanico) [Santa Cruz (single-district)]", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2011, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Direcci\u00f3n Nacional Electoral provisional results from datos.gob.ar (CC-BY-4.0). Long-format CSV pivoted per (a\u00f1o, eleccion_tipo, cargo). eleccion_tipo='GENERALES', cargo='DIPUTADOS/AS PROVINCIALES DISTRITO \u00daNICO'. valid=POSITIVO total; invalid=NULO+EN BLANCO+IMPUGNADO+RECURRIDO; COMANDO votes preserved separately in comando_votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_partido_socialista": "Partido Socialista", "votes_unidos_por_santa_cruz": "Unidos por Santa Cruz", "votes_encuentro_ciudadano_sur": "Encuentro Ciudadano Sur", "votes_union_civica_radical": "Uni\u00f3n C\u00edvica Radical", "votes_coalicion_civica_afirmacion_para_una_republica_igualitaria_ari": "Coalici\u00f3n C\u00edvica - Afirmaci\u00f3n para una Rep\u00fablica Igualitaria ARI", "votes_partido_obrero": "Partido Obrero", "votes_frente_para_la_victoria_santacrucena": "Frente para la Victoria Santacruce\u00f1a"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 745, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T05:55:07.825246", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 745, "n_distinct_geometry": 32, "quality_index": 3.76, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.749, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.573, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.034, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.544, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Front for Victory (FpV)", "winner_candidate": "Cristina Fern\u00e1ndez de Kirchner", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Broad Progressive Front (FAP)", "margin": 37.31, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 745}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "eb9fb19178af43d38a2e640606aa7a72", "name": "Estonia 2023 Riigikogu (Jaoskond)", "metadata": {"country": "Estonia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "VVK canonical results, jaoskond (polling-station, ~600+ units) level. Source: opendata.valimised.ee/api/RK_2023/VOTING_RESULT_IN_PARISH_*.xml. License CC BY 4.0. Each parish XML contains J1, J2, ... cells per party + per totalRow; this dataset extracts those per-jaoskond breakdowns. Sister parquet at parish level (estonia_rk_2023.parquet) is the same data aggregated. i-voting (E cells) NOT split per jaoskond at source.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_eesti_konservatiivne_rahvaerakond": "Eesti Konservatiivne Rahvaerakond", "votes_eesti_keskerakond": "Eesti Keskerakond", "votes_eesti_reformierakond": "Eesti Reformierakond", "votes_erakond_eesti_200": "Erakond Eesti 200", "votes_isamaa_erakond": "ISAMAA Erakond", "votes_sotsiaaldemokraatlik_erakond": "Sotsiaaldemokraatlik Erakond", "votes_eestimaa_hendatud_vasakpartei": "EESTIMAA \u00dcHENDATUD VASAKPARTEI", "votes_erakond_parempoolsed": "Erakond Parempoolsed", "votes_ksikkandidaadid": "\u00dcksikkandidaadid", "votes_erakond_eestimaa_rohelised": "Erakond Eestimaa Rohelised"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 405, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 405, "cast_gt_registered": 404}, "n_stations_flagged": 405, "created_at": "2026-06-05T05:54:58.599620", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.848, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.264, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.845, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.264, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.799, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.833, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.296, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.031, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.031, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.969, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 405}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1e170fc9aee14ff89639b0df939b9daa", "name": "Estonia 2024 European Parliament (Jaoskond)", "metadata": {"country": "Estonia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "VVK canonical results, jaoskond (polling-station, ~600+ units) level. Source: opendata.valimised.ee/api/EP_2024/VOTING_RESULT_IN_PARISH_*.xml. License CC BY 4.0. Each parish XML contains J1, J2, ... cells per party + per totalRow; this dataset extracts those per-jaoskond breakdowns. Sister parquet at parish level (estonia_ep_2024.parquet) is the same data aggregated. i-voting (E cells) NOT split per jaoskond at source.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_isamaa_erakond": "ISAMAA Erakond", "votes_eesti_konservatiivne_rahvaerakond": "Eesti Konservatiivne Rahvaerakond", "votes_eesti_keskerakond": "Eesti Keskerakond", "votes_sotsiaaldemokraatlik_erakond": "Sotsiaaldemokraatlik Erakond", "votes_eesti_reformierakond": "Eesti Reformierakond", "votes_erakond_parempoolsed": "Erakond Parempoolsed", "votes_koos_organisatsioon_osutab_suver_nsusele": "KOOS organisatsioon osutab suver\u00e4\u00e4nsusele", "votes_erakond_eesti_200": "Erakond Eesti 200", "votes_ksikkandidaadid": "\u00dcksikkandidaadid", "votes_erakond_eestimaa_rohelised": "Erakond Eestimaa Rohelised"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 378, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 378, "registered_not_positive": 378}, "n_stations_flagged": 378, "created_at": "2026-06-05T05:54:49.483199", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.848, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.264, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.848, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.264, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.799, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.833, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.296, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.969, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.025, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.025, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.969, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 378}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "aeec8da48b26488dbea61ac57c343eaa", "name": "Ukraine 2010 Presidential \u2014 Round 1 (2010-01-17)", "metadata": {"country": "Ukraine", "year": 2010, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ukraine 2010 presidential election, Round 1 (2010-01-17). Yanukovych led 35.32% / Tymoshenko 25.05% / Tihipko 13.06% / Yatsenyuk 6.96% / Yushchenko (incumbent) 5.45%. 224 TVOs scraped from CVK HTTrack mirror at cvk.gov.ua/pls/vp2010/ (windows-1251 HTML, hashed URLs). Registered + invalid bulletins NOT published per-TVO in HTML \u2014 only cast + candidate votes. Notable: this is the last Ukrainian presidential election BEFORE Crimea annexation, so Crimea (TVOs 1-10, 225) was still able to vote. Ukrai", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_ianukovych_v": "\u042f\u043d\u0443\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447 \u0412. \u0424.", "votes_tymoshenko_iu": "\u0422\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0448\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u042e. \u0412.", "votes_tihipko_s": "\u0422\u0456\u0433\u0456\u043f\u043a\u043e \u0421. \u041b.", "votes_iatseniuk_a": "\u042f\u0446\u0435\u043d\u044e\u043a \u0410. \u041f.", "votes_iushchenko_v": "\u042e\u0449\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u0412. \u0410.", "votes_symonenko_p": "\u0421\u0438\u043c\u043e\u043d\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e  \u041f. \u041c.", "votes_lytvyn_v": "\u041b\u0438\u0442\u0432\u0438\u043d \u0412. \u041c.", "votes_tiahnybok_o": "\u0422\u044f\u0433\u043d\u0438\u0431\u043e\u043a \u041e. \u042f.", "votes_hrytsenko_a": "\u0413\u0440\u0438\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u0410. \u0421.", "votes_bohoslovska_i": "\u0411\u043e\u0433\u043e\u0441\u043b\u043e\u0432\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0430 \u0406. \u0413.", "votes_moroz_o": "\u041c\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0437 \u041e. \u041e.", "votes_kostenko_iu": "\u041a\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u042e. \u0406.", "votes_suprun_l": "\u0421\u0443\u043f\u0440\u0443\u043d \u041b. \u041f.", "votes_protyvsikh_v": "\u041f\u0440\u043e\u0442\u0438\u0432\u0441\u0456\u0445 \u0412. \u0412.", "votes_pabat_o": "\u041f\u0430\u0431\u0430\u0442 \u041e. \u0412.", "votes_ratushniak_s": "\u0420\u0430\u0442\u0443\u0448\u043d\u044f\u043a \u0421. \u041c.", "votes_brodskyy_m": "\u0411\u0440\u043e\u0434\u0441\u044c\u043a\u0438\u0439 \u041c. \u042e.", "votes_riabokon_o": "\u0420\u044f\u0431\u043e\u043a\u043e\u043d\u044c \u041e. \u0412."}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {"final": "final"}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 224, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 224, "registered_not_positive": 224, "cast_gt_registered": 224}, "n_stations_flagged": 224, "created_at": "2026-06-05T05:54:40.976920", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.69, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.049, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.484, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.264, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.69, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.049, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.036, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.458, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.353, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.338, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.971, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.484, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.484, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.264, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.264, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.33, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.211, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.211, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.719, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Party of Regions", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "All-Ukrainian Union \"Fatherland\"", "margin": 3.48, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "UKR", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"final": 224}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "279efb66797c4a4983890999afb7f202", "name": "Ukraine 2010 Presidential \u2014 Round 2 (runoff) (2010-02-07)", "metadata": {"country": "Ukraine", "year": 2010, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ukraine 2010 presidential election, Round 2 (runoff) (2010-02-07). Yanukovych won 48.95% over Tymoshenko 45.47% in a 3.5-pp margin runoff. 222 TVOs scraped from CVK HTTrack mirror at cvk.gov.ua/pls/vp2010/ (windows-1251 HTML, hashed URLs). Registered + invalid bulletins NOT published per-TVO in HTML \u2014 only cast + candidate votes. Notable: this is the last Ukrainian presidential election BEFORE Crimea annexation, so Crimea (TVOs 1-10, 225) was still able to vote. Ukrainian 'against all' option wa", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_ianukovych_v": "\u042f\u043d\u0443\u043a\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447 \u0412. \u0424.", "votes_tymoshenko_iu": "\u0422\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0448\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u042e. \u0412."}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {"final": "final"}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 222, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 222, "cast_valid_mismatch": 222, "registered_not_positive": 222}, "n_stations_flagged": 222, "created_at": "2026-06-05T05:54:32.516377", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.69, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.049, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.484, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.264, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.69, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.049, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.036, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.458, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.353, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.338, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.971, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.484, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.484, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.264, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.264, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.33, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.211, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.211, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.719, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Party of Regions", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "All-Ukrainian Union \"Fatherland\"", "margin": 3.48, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "UKR", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"final": 222}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "81201acff6d54023a02b2af4f0311b79", "name": "Ukraine 2014 Presidential \u2014 Extraordinary (25.05.2014)", "metadata": {"country": "Ukraine", "year": 2014, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ukraine 2014 extraordinary presidential election (25 May 2014), held after the Revolution of Dignity / Yanukovych's flight. Poroshenko won outright in round 1 with 54.70% / 9,857,308 votes (no runoff). Tymoshenko 12.81% / 2,310,050; Lyashko 8.32%; Hrytsenko 5.48%; Tihipko 5.23%. 189 TVOs (197+1 abroad out of 225 nominal) \u2014 Crimea (TVOs 1-10, 224-225) was already under Russian occupation; parts of Donetsk/Luhansk (41-44, 53-56, 61, 104, 108-111) couldn't vote due to separatist control. Source: sc", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_poroshenko_p": "\u041f\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0448\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u041f. \u041e.", "votes_tymoshenko_iu": "\u0422\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0448\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u042e. \u0412.", "votes_liashko_o": "\u041b\u044f\u0448\u043a\u043e \u041e. \u0412.", "votes_hrytsenko_a": "\u0413\u0440\u0438\u0446\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u0410. \u0421.", "votes_tihipko_s": "\u0422\u0456\u0433\u0456\u043f\u043a\u043e \u0421. \u041b.", "votes_dobkin_m": "\u0414\u043e\u0431\u043a\u0456\u043d \u041c. \u041c.", "votes_rabinovych_v": "\u0420\u0430\u0431\u0456\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447 \u0412. \u0417.", "votes_bohomolets_o": "\u0411\u043e\u0433\u043e\u043c\u043e\u043b\u0435\u0446\u044c \u041e. \u0412.", "votes_symonenko_p": "\u0421\u0438\u043c\u043e\u043d\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u041f. \u041c.", "votes_tiahnybok_o": "\u0422\u044f\u0433\u043d\u0438\u0431\u043e\u043a \u041e. \u042f.", "votes_iarosh_d": "\u042f\u0440\u043e\u0448 \u0414. \u0410.", "votes_hrynenko_a": "\u0413\u0440\u0438\u043d\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u0410. \u0412.", "votes_konovaliuk_v": "\u041a\u043e\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0430\u043b\u044e\u043a \u0412. \u0406.", "votes_boyko_iu": "\u0411\u043e\u0439\u043a\u043e \u042e. \u0410.", "votes_malomuzh_m": "\u041c\u0430\u043b\u043e\u043c\u0443\u0436 \u041c. \u0413.", "votes_kuzmin_r": "\u041a\u0443\u0437\u044c\u043c\u0456\u043d \u0420. \u0420.", "votes_kuybida_v": "\u041a\u0443\u0439\u0431\u0456\u0434\u0430 \u0412. \u0421.", "votes_klymenko_o": "\u041a\u043b\u0438\u043c\u0435\u043d\u043a\u043e \u041e. \u0406.", "votes_tsushko_v": "\u0426\u0443\u0448\u043a\u043e \u0412. \u041f.", "votes_saranov_v": "\u0421\u0430\u0440\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432 \u0412. \u0413.", "votes_shkiriak_z": "\u0428\u043a\u0456\u0440\u044f\u043a \u0417. \u041d."}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {"final": "final"}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 189, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 189, "cast_valid_mismatch": 189, "registered_not_positive": 189}, "n_stations_flagged": 189, "created_at": "2026-06-05T05:54:22.499758", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.301, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.985, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.417, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.215, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.301, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.575, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.985, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.451, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.723, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.417, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.417, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.215, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.215, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.293, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.293, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.149, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.149, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"final": 189}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "765892dbe8dd4c109daec43f4301f1aa", "name": "Ukraine 2019 Presidential \u2014 Round 1 (2019-03-31)", "metadata": {"country": "Ukraine", "year": 2019, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ukraine 2019 federal presidential election, Round 1 (31 March 2019). Zelensky 30.24% / Poroshenko 15.95% / Tymoshenko 13.40% / Boiko 11.67% / Hrytsenko 6.91%. 200 Territorial Election Districts (TVOs) + 1 abroad district. 26 TVOs are MISSING from the source data because of Russian occupation of Crimea (TVOs 1-10, 224-225) and parts of Donetsk/Luhansk (41-44, 53-56, 61, 104, 108-111) \u2014 these areas could not vote at all under Ukrainian law. Source: CVK open-data via data.gov.ua/dataset/rezult_vp (", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_balashov_hen": "\u0411\u0410\u041b\u0410\u0428\u041e\u0412 \u0413\u0435\u043d\u043d\u0430\u0434\u0456\u0439 \u0412\u0456\u043a\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_bezsmertnyy_rom": "\u0411\u0415\u0417\u0421\u041c\u0415\u0420\u0422\u041d\u0418\u0419 \u0420\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d \u041f\u0435\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_bohomolets_ol": "\u0411\u041e\u0413\u041e\u041c\u041e\u041b\u0415\u0426\u042c \u041e\u043b\u044c\u0433\u0430 \u0412\u0430\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0456\u0432\u043d\u0430", "votes_bohoslovska_inn": "\u0411\u041e\u0413\u041e\u0421\u041b\u041e\u0412\u0421\u042c\u041a\u0410 \u0406\u043d\u043d\u0430 \u0413\u0435\u0440\u043c\u0430\u043d\u0456\u0432\u043d\u0430", "votes_boyko_iuri": "\u0411\u041e\u0419\u041a\u041e \u042e\u0440\u0456\u0439 \u0410\u043d\u0430\u0442\u043e\u043b\u0456\u0439\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_bondar_vik": "\u0411\u041e\u041d\u0414\u0410\u0420 \u0412\u0456\u043a\u0442\u043e\u0440 \u0412\u0430\u0441\u0438\u043b\u044c\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_vashchenko_ole": "\u0412\u0410\u0429\u0415\u041d\u041a\u041e \u041e\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0440 \u041c\u0438\u0445\u0430\u0439\u043b\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_vilkul_ole": "\u0412\u0406\u041b\u041a\u0423\u041b \u041e\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0440 \u042e\u0440\u0456\u0439\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_haber_myk": "\u0413\u0410\u0411\u0415\u0420 \u041c\u0438\u043a\u043e\u043b\u0430 \u041e\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_hrytsenko_ana": "\u0413\u0420\u0418\u0426\u0415\u041d\u041a\u041e \u0410\u043d\u0430\u0442\u043e\u043b\u0456\u0439 \u0421\u0442\u0435\u043f\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_danyliuk_ole": "\u0414\u0410\u041d\u0418\u041b\u042e\u041a \u041e\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0440 \u0412\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_derevianko_iuri": "\u0414\u0415\u0420\u0415\u0412\u2019\u042f\u041d\u041a\u041e \u042e\u0440\u0456\u0439 \u0411\u043e\u0433\u0434\u0430\u043d\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_zhuravlov_vas": "\u0416\u0423\u0420\u0410\u0412\u041b\u042c\u041e\u0412 \u0412\u0430\u0441\u0438\u043b\u044c \u041c\u0438\u043a\u043e\u043b\u0430\u0439\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_zelenskyy_vol": "\u0417\u0415\u041b\u0415\u041d\u0421\u042c\u041a\u0418\u0419 \u0412\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440 \u041e\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_kaplin_ser": "\u041a\u0410\u041f\u041b\u0406\u041d \u0421\u0435\u0440\u0433\u0456\u0439 \u041c\u0438\u043a\u043e\u043b\u0430\u0439\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_karmazin_iuri": "\u041a\u0410\u0420\u041c\u0410\u0417\u0406\u041d \u042e\u0440\u0456\u0439 \u0410\u043d\u0430\u0442\u043e\u043b\u0456\u0439\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_kyva_ill": "\u041a\u0418\u0412\u0410 \u0406\u043b\u043b\u044f \u0412\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_kornatskyy_ark": "\u041a\u041e\u0420\u041d\u0410\u0426\u042c\u041a\u0418\u0419 \u0410\u0440\u043a\u0430\u0434\u0456\u0439 \u041e\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0456\u0439\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_koshulynskyy_rus": "\u041a\u041e\u0428\u0423\u041b\u0418\u041d\u0421\u042c\u041a\u0418\u0419 \u0420\u0443\u0441\u043b\u0430\u043d \u0412\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_kryvenko_vik": "\u041a\u0420\u0418\u0412\u0415\u041d\u041a\u041e \u0412\u0456\u043a\u0442\u043e\u0440 \u041c\u0438\u043a\u043e\u043b\u0430\u0439\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_kupriy_vit": "\u041a\u0423\u041f\u0420\u0406\u0419 \u0412\u0456\u0442\u0430\u043b\u0456\u0439 \u041c\u0438\u043a\u043e\u043b\u0430\u0439\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_lytvynenko_iuli": "\u041b\u0418\u0422\u0412\u0418\u041d\u0415\u041d\u041a\u041e \u042e\u043b\u0456\u044f \u041b\u0435\u043e\u043d\u0456\u0434\u0456\u0432\u043d\u0430", "votes_liashko_ole": "\u041b\u042f\u0428\u041a\u041e \u041e\u043b\u0435\u0433 \u0412\u0430\u043b\u0435\u0440\u0456\u0439\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_moroz_ole": "\u041c\u041e\u0420\u041e\u0417 \u041e\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0440 \u041e\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_nalyvaychenko_val": "\u041d\u0410\u041b\u0418\u0412\u0410\u0419\u0427\u0415\u041d\u041a\u041e \u0412\u0430\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0438\u043d \u041e\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_nasirov_rom": "\u041d\u0410\u0421\u0406\u0420\u041e\u0412 \u0420\u043e\u043c\u0430\u043d \u041c\u0438\u0445\u0430\u0439\u043b\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_novak_and": "\u041d\u041e\u0412\u0410\u041a \u0410\u043d\u0434\u0440\u0456\u0439 \u042f\u0440\u0435\u043c\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_nosenko_ser": "\u041d\u041e\u0421\u0415\u041d\u041a\u041e \u0421\u0435\u0440\u0433\u0456\u0439 \u041c\u0438\u0445\u0430\u0439\u043b\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_petrov_vol": "\u041f\u0415\u0422\u0420\u041e\u0412 \u0412\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440 \u0412\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_poroshenko_pet": "\u041f\u041e\u0420\u041e\u0428\u0415\u041d\u041a\u041e \u041f\u0435\u0442\u0440\u043e \u041e\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0456\u0439\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_ryhovanov_rus": "\u0420\u0418\u0413\u041e\u0412\u0410\u041d\u041e\u0412 \u0420\u0443\u0441\u043b\u0430\u043d \u041e\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_skotsyk_vit": "\u0421\u041a\u041e\u0426\u0418\u041a \u0412\u0456\u0442\u0430\u043b\u0456\u0439 \u0404\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0444\u0456\u0439\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_smeshko_iho": "\u0421\u041c\u0415\u0428\u041a\u041e \u0406\u0433\u043e\u0440 \u041f\u0435\u0442\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_solovyov_ole": "\u0421\u041e\u041b\u041e\u0412\u0419\u041e\u0412 \u041e\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0440 \u041c\u0438\u043a\u043e\u043b\u0430\u0439\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_taruta_ser": "\u0422\u0410\u0420\u0423\u0422\u0410 \u0421\u0435\u0440\u0433\u0456\u0439 \u041e\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0456\u0439\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_tymoshenko_iuli": "\u0422\u0418\u041c\u041e\u0428\u0415\u041d\u041a\u041e \u042e\u043b\u0456\u044f \u0412\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440\u0456\u0432\u043d\u0430", "votes_tymoshenko_iuri": "\u0422\u0418\u041c\u041e\u0428\u0415\u041d\u041a\u041e \u042e\u0440\u0456\u0439 \u0412\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0434\u0438\u043c\u0438\u0440\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_shevchenko_iho": "\u0428\u0415\u0412\u0427\u0415\u041d\u041a\u041e \u0406\u0433\u043e\u0440 \u0410\u043d\u0430\u0442\u043e\u043b\u0456\u0439\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447", "votes_shevchenko_ole": "\u0428\u0415\u0412\u0427\u0415\u041d\u041a\u041e \u041e\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0440 \u041b\u0435\u043e\u043d\u0456\u0434\u043e\u0432\u0438\u0447"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {"final": "final"}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 200, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 103}, "n_stations_flagged": 103, "created_at": "2026-06-05T05:46:47.098225", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 1, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.505, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.73, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.528, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.318, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.505, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.206, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.332, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.583, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.675, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.528, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.528, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.318, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.366, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.366, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.292, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"final": 200}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "670b4efa1e734b15b1b01e68eefefbc0", "name": "India 2024 Lok Sabha General Election \u2014 Section 58A repoll overlay", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "ECI-published Section 58A re-polling record for the 2024 Lok Sabha General Election (held in 7 phases, April-June 2024). Source: Annexure 16 'Details of Re-poll Held' from the GE-2024 Statistical Report at www.eci.gov.in (XLS, 8.5 KB). Grand Total: 40 PSs across 13 Parliamentary Constituencies in 10 states/UTs (Arunachal Pradesh, Bihar, Gujarat, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Odisha, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal). Manipur was the largest state contributor (Inner Manipur PC-1: 11 PS", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_total": "Total (overlay placeholder)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {"recount": "recount"}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 13}, "n_stations_flagged": 13, "created_at": "2026-06-05T05:43:15.307399", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.381, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.281, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.281, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"recount": 13}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": true}, {"id": "45d329d3ffda4cd2b1056b7f271c2e40", "name": "Sweden 2018 Riksdag", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Sweden Riksdag 2018 results at valdistrikt level, parsed from sv-valmyndigheten/2018/2018_R_per_valdistrikt.xlsx. Long format (one row per station \u00d7 party). Polygon centroids from sv-valmyndigheten/2018/2018_valgeografi_valdistrikt.zip (SWEREF 99 TM, reprojected to WGS 84).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "party_name", "long_candidate_votes_col": "party_votes", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6325, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 321, "registered_not_positive": 321}, "n_stations_flagged": 321, "created_at": "2026-06-05T05:37:49.297344", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.88, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.915, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.908, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.875, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.297, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.187, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.547, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.008, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.008, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6325}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e75184dd270c4633b97278aed98600f5", "name": "Poland 2023 \u2014 Sejm per-obw\u00f3d (31.5K stations, PiS-KO transition)", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "PKW dane.kbw.gov.pl/dane/2023/sejmsenat/wyniki_gl_na_listy_po_obwodach_sejm_csv. 12 list committees. KO+TD+Lewica beat PiS forming the Tusk govt.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "wojewodztwo", "sub_region_col": "powiat", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"KOMITET WYBORCZY BEZPARTYJNI SAMORZ\u0104DOWCY": "KOMITET WYBORCZY BEZPARTYJNI SAMORZ\u0104DOWCY", "KOALICYJNY KOMITET WYBORCZY TRZECIA DROGA POLSKA 2050 SZYMONA HO\u0141OWNI - POLSKIE STRONNICTWO LUDOWE": "KOALICYJNY KOMITET WYBORCZY TRZECIA DROGA POLSKA 2050 SZYMONA HO\u0141OWNI - POLSKIE STRONNICTWO LUDOWE", "KOMITET WYBORCZY NOWA LEWICA": "KOMITET WYBORCZY NOWA LEWICA", "KOMITET WYBORCZY PRAWO I SPRAWIEDLIWO\u015a\u0106": "KOMITET WYBORCZY PRAWO I SPRAWIEDLIWO\u015a\u0106", "KOMITET WYBORCZY KONFEDERACJA WOLNO\u015a\u0106 I NIEPODLEG\u0141O\u015a\u0106": "KOMITET WYBORCZY KONFEDERACJA WOLNO\u015a\u0106 I NIEPODLEG\u0141O\u015a\u0106", "KOALICYJNY KOMITET WYBORCZY KOALICJA OBYWATELSKA PO _N IPL ZIELONI": "KOALICYJNY KOMITET WYBORCZY KOALICJA OBYWATELSKA PO _N IPL ZIELONI", "KOMITET WYBORCZY POLSKA JEST JEDNA": "KOMITET WYBORCZY POLSKA JEST JEDNA", "KOMITET WYBORCZY WYBORC\u00d3W RUCHU DOBROBYTU I POKOJU": "KOMITET WYBORCZY WYBORC\u00d3W RUCHU DOBROBYTU I POKOJU", "KOMITET WYBORCZY NORMALNY KRAJ": "KOMITET WYBORCZY NORMALNY KRAJ", "KOMITET WYBORCZY ANTYPARTIA": "KOMITET WYBORCZY ANTYPARTIA", "KOMITET WYBORCZY RUCH NAPRAWY POLSKI": "KOMITET WYBORCZY RUCH NAPRAWY POLSKI", "KOMITET WYBORCZY WYBORC\u00d3W MNIEJSZO\u015a\u0106 NIEMIECKA": "KOMITET WYBORCZY WYBORC\u00d3W MNIEJSZO\u015a\u0106 NIEMIECKA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 31074, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 9862}, "n_stations_flagged": 9862, "created_at": "2026-06-05T05:31:04.714351", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.755, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.863, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.598, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.457, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.755, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.343, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.47, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.518, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.012, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.598, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.457, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.52, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.52, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.56, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.13, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.13, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.659, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 31074}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "77c368c7be4543048a678cf859163065", "name": "Chile 2013 \u2014 Presidential R2 (Bachelet v Matthei)", "metadata": {"country": "Chile", "year": 2013, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Servel mesa-level via Wayback.", "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "Provincia", "sub_region_col": "Comuna", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"EVELYN MATTHEI FORNET": "EVELYN MATTHEI FORNET", "MICHELLE BACHELET JERIA": "MICHELLE BACHELET JERIA", "VOTOS EN BLANCO": "VOTOS EN BLANCO", "VOTOS NULOS": "VOTOS NULOS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 30611, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 30611, "cast_gt_registered": 30611}, "n_stations_flagged": 30611, "created_at": "2026-06-05T05:29:10.978827", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.919, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.951, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.894, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.846, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.442, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.568, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.642, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.894, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.672, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.965, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.076, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.076, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "New Majority for Chile/Socialist Party of Chile", "winner_candidate": "Michelle Bachelet Jeria", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Alliance", "margin": 29.29, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "CHL", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 30611}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bed5e9a0fecf443fafbd9da8f4f13bf9", "name": "Chile 2013 \u2014 Presidential R1 (36K mesas)", "metadata": {"country": "Chile", "year": 2013, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Servel mesa-level via Wayback. 9 candidates.", "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "Provincia", "sub_region_col": "Comuna", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ALFREDO SFEIR YOUNIS": "ALFREDO SFEIR YOUNIS", "EVELYN MATTHEI FORNET": "EVELYN MATTHEI FORNET", "FRANCO ALDO PARISI FERNANDEZ": "FRANCO ALDO PARISI FERNANDEZ", "MARCEL CLAUDE REYES": "MARCEL CLAUDE REYES", "MARCO ENRIQUEZ-OMINAMI GUMUCIO": "MARCO ENRIQUEZ-OMINAMI GUMUCIO", "MICHELLE BACHELET JERIA": "MICHELLE BACHELET JERIA", "RICARDO ISRAEL ZIPPER": "RICARDO ISRAEL ZIPPER", "ROXANA MIRANDA MENESES": "ROXANA MIRANDA MENESES", "TOMAS JOCELYN-HOLT LETELIER": "TOMAS JOCELYN-HOLT LETELIER", "VOTOS EN BLANCO": "VOTOS EN BLANCO", "VOTOS NULOS": "VOTOS NULOS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 30611, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 30611, "cast_gt_registered": 30611}, "n_stations_flagged": 30611, "created_at": "2026-06-05T05:26:33.195454", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.919, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.951, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.894, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.846, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.442, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.568, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.642, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.894, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.672, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.965, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.076, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.076, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "New Majority for Chile/Socialist Party of Chile", "winner_candidate": "Michelle Bachelet Jeria", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Alliance", "margin": 29.29, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "CHL", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 30611}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "155bbe76b15e4de3872cf37fa202fcfe", "name": "Slovakia 2023 \u2014 NRSR okrsky (5.9K)", "metadata": {"country": "Slovakia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "volby.statistics.sk N\u00e1rodn\u00e1 Rada SR with preferential votes.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"K\u00f3d kraja": "K\u00f3d kraja", "Kraj": "Kraj", "K\u00f3d obvodu": "K\u00f3d obvodu", "Obvod": "Obvod", "K\u00f3d okresu": "K\u00f3d okresu", "Okres": "Okres", "K\u00f3d obce": "K\u00f3d obce", "Obec": "Obec", "Okrsok": "Okrsok", "TIP / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Hudec": "TIP / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Hudec", "TIP / Jana Volo\u0161inov\u00e1": "TIP / Jana Volo\u0161inov\u00e1", "TIP / Martin Schwantzer": "TIP / Martin Schwantzer", "TIP / Marek Loveck\u00fd": "TIP / Marek Loveck\u00fd", "TIP / Andrea Oravcov\u00e1": "TIP / Andrea Oravcov\u00e1", "TIP / Marek Kri\u017e\u00e1nek": "TIP / Marek Kri\u017e\u00e1nek", "TIP / \u013dubo\u0161 Majer": "TIP / \u013dubo\u0161 Majer", "TIP / J\u00e1n Hurban": "TIP / J\u00e1n Hurban", "TIP / Peter Sedl\u00e1k": "TIP / Peter Sedl\u00e1k", "TIP / Mat\u00fa\u0161 \u0160ima\u013e": "TIP / Mat\u00fa\u0161 \u0160ima\u013e", "TIP / Ivana Ven\u017e\u00edkov\u00e1": "TIP / Ivana Ven\u017e\u00edkov\u00e1", "TIP / Karol Hude\u010dek": "TIP / Karol Hude\u010dek", "TIP / \u013dubom\u00edr Bajus": "TIP / \u013dubom\u00edr Bajus", "TIP / Miroslav Pinte": "TIP / Miroslav Pinte", "TIP / Mari\u00e1n Mandel\u00edk": "TIP / Mari\u00e1n Mandel\u00edk", "TIP / Anton Min\u00e1rik": "TIP / Anton Min\u00e1rik", "TIP / Franti\u0161ek Hanc": "TIP / Franti\u0161ek Hanc", "TIP / Roman Vaja\u0161": "TIP / Roman Vaja\u0161", "TIP / Mari\u00e1n Fabu\u0161": "TIP / Mari\u00e1n Fabu\u0161", "TIP / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Novota": "TIP / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Novota", "TIP / Milan Krigler": "TIP / Milan Krigler", "TIP / Gabriela Mikov\u00e1": "TIP / Gabriela Mikov\u00e1", "TIP / \u013dubom\u00edr Hadvi\u010d\u00e1k": "TIP / \u013dubom\u00edr Hadvi\u010d\u00e1k", "TIP / Marian Andr\u00e1\u0161ko": "TIP / Marian Andr\u00e1\u0161ko", "TIP / Kamil B\u00edlek": "TIP / Kamil B\u00edlek", "TIP / Gejza Dubovicky": "TIP / Gejza Dubovicky", "TIP / Juraj Tilesch": "TIP / Juraj Tilesch", "TIP / Eva Kov\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1": "TIP / Eva Kov\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1", "TIP / Martin Mitter": "TIP / Martin Mitter", "TIP / Rastislav Gajdo\u0161": "TIP / Rastislav Gajdo\u0161", "TIP / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Kromka": "TIP / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Kromka", "TIP / Martin Michal\u00edk": "TIP / Martin Michal\u00edk", "TIP / Mat\u00fa\u0161 Jurko": "TIP / Mat\u00fa\u0161 Jurko", "TIP / Miriam Hadob\u00e1s": "TIP / Miriam Hadob\u00e1s", "TIP / Peter \u017dif\u010d\u00e1k": "TIP / Peter \u017dif\u010d\u00e1k", "TIP / Jozef Lacka\u0148": "TIP / Jozef Lacka\u0148", "TIP / Marek \u0160panihel": "TIP / Marek \u0160panihel", "TIP / Jozef Boja\u010dko": "TIP / Jozef Boja\u010dko", "TIP / Nikola Babinsk\u00e1": "TIP / Nikola Babinsk\u00e1", "TIP / Igor Pola\u0161ko": "TIP / Igor Pola\u0161ko", "TIP / J\u00e1n Havri\u013e\u00e1k": "TIP / J\u00e1n Havri\u013e\u00e1k", "TIP / Nikoleta Mich\u00e1lkov\u00e1": "TIP / Nikoleta Mich\u00e1lkov\u00e1", "TIP / Vlasta Be\u0148ov\u00e1": "TIP / Vlasta Be\u0148ov\u00e1", "TIP / M\u00e1ria Michnov\u00e1": "TIP / M\u00e1ria Michnov\u00e1", "TIP / Alena \u017didov\u00e1": "TIP / Alena \u017didov\u00e1", "TIP / Eduard Herdel": "TIP / Eduard Herdel", "TIP / Ernest\u00edna B\u00f3\u017eikov\u00e1": "TIP / Ernest\u00edna B\u00f3\u017eikov\u00e1", "TIP / J\u00e1n Varga": "TIP / J\u00e1n Varga", "TIP / Martin Kuch\u00e1r": "TIP / Martin Kuch\u00e1r", "TIP / Imrich Habu\u0161ta": "TIP / Imrich Habu\u0161ta", "TIP / Pavol G\u00e1bor": "TIP / Pavol G\u00e1bor", "TIP / Miroslav Vojsovi\u010d": "TIP / Miroslav Vojsovi\u010d", "TIP / Peter Mali\u0148\u00e1k": "TIP / Peter Mali\u0148\u00e1k", "TIP / Michal Lazor": "TIP / Michal Lazor", "TIP / J\u00e1n \u010curlik": "TIP / J\u00e1n \u010curlik", "TIP / Maro\u0161 Fedor": "TIP / Maro\u0161 Fedor", "TIP / R\u00f3bert Rosenberg": "TIP / R\u00f3bert Rosenberg", "TIP / Viera Simanov\u00e1": "TIP / Viera Simanov\u00e1", "TIP / Marek Chn\u00e1pko": "TIP / Marek Chn\u00e1pko", "TIP / Michal Kon\u010d": "TIP / Michal Kon\u010d", "TIP / Radovan Bet\u00edk": "TIP / Radovan Bet\u00edk", "TIP / Miroslava Drabi\u0161\u010d\u00e1kov\u00e1": "TIP / Miroslava Drabi\u0161\u010d\u00e1kov\u00e1", "TIP / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Urban\u00edk": "TIP / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Urban\u00edk", "TIP / Radom\u00edr W\u00e1gner": "TIP / Radom\u00edr W\u00e1gner", "TIP / J\u00e1n Roth": "TIP / J\u00e1n Roth", "TIP / Lucia Mlyn\u00e1rikov\u00e1": "TIP / Lucia Mlyn\u00e1rikov\u00e1", "TIP / Ivan Len\u00e1r": "TIP / Ivan Len\u00e1r", "TIP / Juraj Mu\u0161uta": "TIP / Juraj Mu\u0161uta", "TIP / Jakub Alchus": "TIP / Jakub Alchus", "TIP / Ras\u0165o Kyse\u013e": "TIP / Ras\u0165o Kyse\u013e", "TIP / M\u00e1ria \u017dof\u010d\u00ednov\u00e1": "TIP / M\u00e1ria \u017dof\u010d\u00ednov\u00e1", "TIP / Franti\u0161ek P\u0159\u00edkopa": "TIP / Franti\u0161ek P\u0159\u00edkopa", "TIP / Jozef \u010eurina": "TIP / Jozef \u010eurina", "TIP / Viktor Horansk\u00fd": "TIP / Viktor Horansk\u00fd", "TIP / R\u00f3bert Hlavinka": "TIP / R\u00f3bert Hlavinka", "TIP / Drahoslav Tk\u00e1\u010d": "TIP / Drahoslav Tk\u00e1\u010d", "TIP / Milan Sal\u00e1k": "TIP / Milan Sal\u00e1k", "TIP / Jozef Ihn\u00e1t": "TIP / Jozef Ihn\u00e1t", "TIP / Kl\u00e1ra Luk\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1": "TIP / Kl\u00e1ra Luk\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1", "TIP / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Tvaro\u017eek": "TIP / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Tvaro\u017eek", "TIP / M\u00e1ria Krav\u00e1rikov\u00e1": "TIP / M\u00e1ria Krav\u00e1rikov\u00e1", "TIP / Mari\u00e1n Kraj\u010do": "TIP / Mari\u00e1n Kraj\u010do", "TIP / Nat\u00e1lia \u0160\u010dep\u00e1nkov\u00e1": "TIP / Nat\u00e1lia \u0160\u010dep\u00e1nkov\u00e1", "TIP / J\u00e1n Be\u0148o": "TIP / J\u00e1n Be\u0148o", "TIP / David \u0160ev\u010d\u00edk": "TIP / David \u0160ev\u010d\u00edk", "TIP / Margita M\u00e9hesov\u00e1": "TIP / Margita M\u00e9hesov\u00e1", "TIP / Andrej Hude\u010dek": "TIP / Andrej Hude\u010dek", "TIP / Daniel Sl\u00e1dek": "TIP / Daniel Sl\u00e1dek", "TIP / J\u00e1n \u0160adibol": "TIP / J\u00e1n \u0160adibol", "TIP / Gabriel Vilcega": "TIP / Gabriel Vilcega", "TIP / Iveta T\u00f3thov\u00e1": "TIP / Iveta T\u00f3thov\u00e1", "TIP / Andrej Lal\u00edk": "TIP / Andrej Lal\u00edk", "TIP / Katar\u00edna Ko\u0161\u00e1rov\u00e1": "TIP / Katar\u00edna Ko\u0161\u00e1rov\u00e1", "TIP / Ondrej Mu\u0161ka": "TIP / Ondrej Mu\u0161ka", "TIP / Anton Baniar": "TIP / Anton Baniar", "TIP / Peter Nociar": "TIP / Peter Nociar", "TIP / Monika Ole\u0148ov\u00e1": "TIP / Monika Ole\u0148ov\u00e1", "TIP / Erik Oslanec": "TIP / Erik Oslanec", "TIP / Gabriel Rusz\u00f3": "TIP / Gabriel Rusz\u00f3", "TIP / J\u00e1n Kan\u010do": "TIP / J\u00e1n Kan\u010do", "TIP / Du\u0161an Bambu\u0161ek": "TIP / Du\u0161an Bambu\u0161ek", "TIP / Nade\u017eda B\u00faryov\u00e1": "TIP / Nade\u017eda B\u00faryov\u00e1", "TIP / Viliam Tom\u00e1\u0161ik": "TIP / Viliam Tom\u00e1\u0161ik", "TIP / Marcel Luk\u00e1\u010d": "TIP / Marcel Luk\u00e1\u010d", "TIP / R\u00f3bert Mydlo": "TIP / R\u00f3bert Mydlo", "TIP / Anton Malatinec": "TIP / Anton Malatinec", "TIP / Ondrej Glajza": "TIP / Ondrej Glajza", "TIP / Viktor Tonhajzer": "TIP / Viktor Tonhajzer", "TIP / Simona Jankovi\u010dov\u00e1": "TIP / Simona Jankovi\u010dov\u00e1", "TIP / Peter Revick\u00fd": "TIP / Peter Revick\u00fd", "TIP / Martin Bambura": "TIP / Martin Bambura", "TIP / Peter Ihn\u00e1t": "TIP / Peter Ihn\u00e1t", "TIP / Katar\u00edna Hvizdov\u00e1": "TIP / Katar\u00edna Hvizdov\u00e1", "TIP / Martin Min\u00e1rik": "TIP / Martin Min\u00e1rik", "TIP / Jana Molekov\u00e1": "TIP / Jana Molekov\u00e1", "TIP / Marta Hanu\u0161ovsk\u00e1": "TIP / Marta Hanu\u0161ovsk\u00e1", "TIP / Andrea Ga\u0161parov\u00e1": "TIP / Andrea Ga\u0161parov\u00e1", "TIP / Martina Tatarkov\u00e1": "TIP / Martina Tatarkov\u00e1", "TIP / Jana Moln\u00e1rov\u00e1": "TIP / Jana Moln\u00e1rov\u00e1", "TIP / Jana Moj\u017ei\u0161ov\u00e1": "TIP / Jana Moj\u017ei\u0161ov\u00e1", "TIP / Du\u0161an Krcho": "TIP / Du\u0161an Krcho", "TIP / Martin Hozza": "TIP / Martin Hozza", "TIP / Marcel Mach\u00e1\u010d": "TIP / Marcel Mach\u00e1\u010d", "TIP / Viktor De\u00e1k": "TIP / Viktor De\u00e1k", "TIP / Pavol Kov\u00e1\u010d": "TIP / Pavol Kov\u00e1\u010d", "TIP / Viliam Kr\u00e1lik": "TIP / Viliam Kr\u00e1lik", "TIP / M\u00e1ria Rosenbergov\u00e1": "TIP / M\u00e1ria Rosenbergov\u00e1", "TIP / Igor Durd\u00edk": "TIP / Igor Durd\u00edk", "TIP / Adriana Horn\u00edkov\u00e1": "TIP / Adriana Horn\u00edkov\u00e1", "TIP / Mari\u00e1n Valovi\u010d": "TIP / Mari\u00e1n Valovi\u010d", "TIP / Kamila Rajnicov\u00e1": "TIP / Kamila Rajnicov\u00e1", "TIP / Marcel Bochin": "TIP / Marcel Bochin", "TIP / Jana Ko\u017eejov\u00e1": "TIP / Jana Ko\u017eejov\u00e1", "TIP / \u013dubom\u00edr Cmar": "TIP / \u013dubom\u00edr Cmar", "TIP / \u013dubo\u0161 Murga": "TIP / \u013dubo\u0161 Murga", "TIP / Angelika Tak\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1": "TIP / Angelika Tak\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1", "TIP / Roman Keru\u013e": "TIP / Roman Keru\u013e", "TIP / Linda Nos\u00e1lov\u00e1": "TIP / Linda Nos\u00e1lov\u00e1", "TIP / Miroslav Betu\u0161": "TIP / Miroslav Betu\u0161", "TIP / Henrieta Anderkov\u00e1": "TIP / Henrieta Anderkov\u00e1", "TIP / Nat\u00e1lia Ungerov\u00e1": "TIP / Nat\u00e1lia Ungerov\u00e1", "TIP / Ladislav Rybarsk\u00fd": "TIP / Ladislav Rybarsk\u00fd", "TIP / Ladislav Dolansk\u00fd": "TIP / Ladislav Dolansk\u00fd", "TIP / Stanislav Belovi\u010d": "TIP / Stanislav Belovi\u010d", "TIP / Peter Kozma": "TIP / Peter Kozma", "TIP / J\u00e1n Mu\u0161uta": "TIP / J\u00e1n Mu\u0161uta", "TIP / Jana Vojtekov\u00e1": "TIP / Jana Vojtekov\u00e1", "TIP / Erik Kalu\u017ea": "TIP / Erik Kalu\u017ea", "TIP / Michal Urban": "TIP / Michal Urban", "TIP / Martin Kov\u00e1\u010d": "TIP / Martin Kov\u00e1\u010d", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Milan Urb\u00e1ni": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Milan Urb\u00e1ni", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Milan Lopa\u0161ovsk\u00fd": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Milan Lopa\u0161ovsk\u00fd", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Simona Gul\u00e1kov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Simona Gul\u00e1kov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Mari\u00e1n Geci": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Mari\u00e1n Geci", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Ladislav Slebodn\u00edk": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Ladislav Slebodn\u00edk", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Andrej Sliacky": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Andrej Sliacky", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Peter Regina": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Peter Regina", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jaroslav Jen\u010do": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jaroslav Jen\u010do", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / \u0160tefan Barto\u0161": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / \u0160tefan Barto\u0161", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Janka Bursov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Janka Bursov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / J\u00e1n Potock\u00fd": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / J\u00e1n Potock\u00fd", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Radovan S\u00e9le\u0161": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Radovan S\u00e9le\u0161", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Ondrej Chovanec": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Ondrej Chovanec", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Jozaniak": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Jozaniak", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Zemko": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Zemko", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Marcela Gallov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Marcela Gallov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Milan Moj\u017ei\u0161": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Milan Moj\u017ei\u0161", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Anna Iv\u00e1nkov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Anna Iv\u00e1nkov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Miroslav Andr\u00e1ssy": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Miroslav Andr\u00e1ssy", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Daniel Belko": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Daniel Belko", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Gabriel Koll\u00e1r": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Gabriel Koll\u00e1r", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / \u0160tefan Ondik": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / \u0160tefan Ondik", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Katar\u00edna Paukov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Katar\u00edna Paukov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Martin Magura": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Martin Magura", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Vladislav Berkovi\u010d": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Vladislav Berkovi\u010d", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Mari\u00e1n \u0160ivara": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Mari\u00e1n \u0160ivara", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / J\u00e1n Hra\u0161ko": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / J\u00e1n Hra\u0161ko", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / J\u00e1n \u0160imko": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / J\u00e1n \u0160imko", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Michal Janek": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Michal Janek", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / \u0160tefan Ladi\u010dkovsk\u00fd": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / \u0160tefan Ladi\u010dkovsk\u00fd", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Roman Pivar\u010di": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Roman Pivar\u010di", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Robert Hazucha": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Robert Hazucha", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Peter Hysek": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Peter Hysek", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Ingrid Kosme\u013eov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Ingrid Kosme\u013eov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Peter \u0160pac\u00edr": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Peter \u0160pac\u00edr", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Ji\u0159\u00ed Shejbal": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Ji\u0159\u00ed Shejbal", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Peter \u0160vec": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Peter \u0160vec", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Ondrej Kralina": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Ondrej Kralina", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Stanislav Hal\u010din": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Stanislav Hal\u010din", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Martin Kov\u00e1\u0159": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Martin Kov\u00e1\u0159", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Franti\u0161ek Barto\u0161": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Franti\u0161ek Barto\u0161", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Vladim\u00edr Popovi\u010d": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Vladim\u00edr Popovi\u010d", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Milan Mare\u010d\u00e1k": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Milan Mare\u010d\u00e1k", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Viera \u0160\u00e1ndorov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Viera \u0160\u00e1ndorov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Monika Matu\u0161iakov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Monika Matu\u0161iakov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Ivana Matu\u0161kov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Ivana Matu\u0161kov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Michal Antu\u0161": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Michal Antu\u0161", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jozef Popjak": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jozef Popjak", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Kamil Slota": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Kamil Slota", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / \u013dubom\u00edr \u010ci\u017em\u00e1r": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / \u013dubom\u00edr \u010ci\u017em\u00e1r", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Klaudia Hlo\u017eekov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Klaudia Hlo\u017eekov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / J\u00e1n Longauer": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / J\u00e1n Longauer", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / M\u00e1ria \u010cern\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / M\u00e1ria \u010cern\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Alica Stra\u010d\u00e1rov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Alica Stra\u010d\u00e1rov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jozef Ben\u010di\u010d": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jozef Ben\u010di\u010d", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Gabriela Jur\u00edkov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Gabriela Jur\u00edkov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Lucia Staro\u0148ov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Lucia Staro\u0148ov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Lucia Harisov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Lucia Harisov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jozef Fekia\u010d": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jozef Fekia\u010d", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Angelika Tankov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Angelika Tankov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Viera Sabov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Viera Sabov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Iveta Tal\u00e1nov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Iveta Tal\u00e1nov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Miroslav Menyk\u00f6": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Miroslav Menyk\u00f6", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Marek \u010culen": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Marek \u010culen", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Daniela Len\u010dov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Daniela Len\u010dov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Mikul\u00e1\u0161 Bog\u013earsk\u00fd": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Mikul\u00e1\u0161 Bog\u013earsk\u00fd", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Miroslav Bud\u00e1\u010d": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Miroslav Bud\u00e1\u010d", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Ladislav L\u00ed\u0161ka": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Ladislav L\u00ed\u0161ka", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Marta Maskalikov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Marta Maskalikov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Monika Pulmannov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Monika Pulmannov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Pavol Neupauer": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Pavol Neupauer", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Pavol Zvar\u00edk": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Pavol Zvar\u00edk", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Elena Majerov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Elena Majerov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Iveta Orosov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Iveta Orosov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / J\u00falia Skorkov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / J\u00falia Skorkov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Alb\u00edn Humensk\u00fd": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Alb\u00edn Humensk\u00fd", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Viera Kubal\u00edkov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Viera Kubal\u00edkov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jaroslav Krn\u00e1\u010d": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jaroslav Krn\u00e1\u010d", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Pavol Valko": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Pavol Valko", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Viera Sokol\u00edkov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Viera Sokol\u00edkov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Mari\u00e1n Kova\u013e": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Mari\u00e1n Kova\u013e", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Stanislav Za\u0165ko": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Stanislav Za\u0165ko", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Ladislav Pondi": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Ladislav Pondi", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Katar\u00edna Oslovi\u010dov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Katar\u00edna Oslovi\u010dov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Eva Medve\u010fov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Eva Medve\u010fov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Gabriel Timko": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Gabriel Timko", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jana D\u017eulov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jana D\u017eulov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Martin Petru\u0161ka": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Martin Petru\u0161ka", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Peter Zachar": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Peter Zachar", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jaroslav Mochnack\u00fd": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jaroslav Mochnack\u00fd", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Zuzana Hra\u0161kov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Zuzana Hra\u0161kov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Marta Kicov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Marta Kicov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Roman Haris": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Roman Haris", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Karol \u0160trb\u00e1k": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Karol \u0160trb\u00e1k", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Martin \u0160\u00edp": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Martin \u0160\u00edp", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jozef \u0170berlauer": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jozef \u0170berlauer", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Andrea Kandrav\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Andrea Kandrav\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / J\u00e1n Koll\u00e1r": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / J\u00e1n Koll\u00e1r", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Dani\u0161": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Dani\u0161", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Erik L\u00e1szl\u00f3": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Erik L\u00e1szl\u00f3", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Mari\u00e1n Ha\u0161ko": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Mari\u00e1n Ha\u0161ko", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Stanislav Bubelini": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Stanislav Bubelini", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Lucia Kudla\u010dov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Lucia Kudla\u010dov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Robert Hrn\u010diar": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Robert Hrn\u010diar", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Miroslav \u0160amko": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Miroslav \u0160amko", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / J\u00e1n Bela": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / J\u00e1n Bela", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Slavom\u00edr Ol\u00e1h": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Slavom\u00edr Ol\u00e1h", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Denisa Za\u0165kov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Denisa Za\u0165kov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Norbert Papanec": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Norbert Papanec", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Privits": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Privits", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Beata Felov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Beata Felov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Anton B\u00e1novsk\u00fd": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Anton B\u00e1novsk\u00fd", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Eva Olachov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Eva Olachov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / J\u00e1n Sliacky": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / J\u00e1n Sliacky", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Du\u0161an Segedy": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Du\u0161an Segedy", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Martin Juri\u010dak": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Martin Juri\u010dak", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jana Fedorkov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jana Fedorkov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / \u0160tefan Vra\u0161tiak": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / \u0160tefan Vra\u0161tiak", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / M\u00e1ria Legi\u0148ov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / M\u00e1ria Legi\u0148ov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Milan Sihelsky": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Milan Sihelsky", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Lenka Ol\u010d\u00e1kov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Lenka Ol\u010d\u00e1kov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Marek \u0160amko": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Marek \u0160amko", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jaroslav Va\u0148o": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jaroslav Va\u0148o", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jaroslav Va\u0148o.1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jaroslav Va\u0148o.1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / M\u00e1ria Holubov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / M\u00e1ria Holubov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Just\u00edna \u017digov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Just\u00edna \u017digov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Gabriel \u017diga": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Gabriel \u017diga", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Peter Vajdiar": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Peter Vajdiar", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Ladislav Siv\u00e1k": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Ladislav Siv\u00e1k", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Filip": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Filip", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Marcela Filipov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Marcela Filipov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Marianna Spi\u0161\u00e1kov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Marianna Spi\u0161\u00e1kov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Martina Adamov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Martina Adamov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Tibor Matula": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Tibor Matula", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Vladislav Kon\u00f4pka": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Vladislav Kon\u00f4pka", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Adri\u00e1na Moj\u017ei\u0161ov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Adri\u00e1na Moj\u017ei\u0161ov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Dana \u010cill\u00edkov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Dana \u010cill\u00edkov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jaroslav Benko": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Jaroslav Benko", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Emil Kisel": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Emil Kisel", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Peter Jur\u010d\u00e1k": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Peter Jur\u010d\u00e1k", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Stanislav Jur\u00edk": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Stanislav Jur\u00edk", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Emil Nov\u00e1k": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Emil Nov\u00e1k", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Helena Bahe\u013eov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Helena Bahe\u013eov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Martina Durb\u00e1kov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Martina Durb\u00e1kov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Dalibor Eli\u00e1\u0161": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Dalibor Eli\u00e1\u0161", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Peter Kraslan": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Peter Kraslan", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Franti\u0161ek Haris": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Franti\u0161ek Haris", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Gabriela Berkyov\u00e1": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Gabriela Berkyov\u00e1", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / \u013dubom\u00edr Elia\u0161": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / \u013dubom\u00edr Elia\u0161", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / J\u00falius Mako": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / J\u00falius Mako", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Veronika Remi\u0161ov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Veronika Remi\u0161ov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Alan Such\u00e1nek": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Alan Such\u00e1nek", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Viera Duba\u010dov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Viera Duba\u010dov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Marek Kraj\u010d\u00ed": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Marek Kraj\u010d\u00ed", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Oto \u017darnay": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Oto \u017darnay", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / So\u0148a Gabor\u010d\u00e1kov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / So\u0148a Gabor\u010d\u00e1kov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Anna Vere\u0161ov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Anna Vere\u0161ov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Silvia Petruchov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Silvia Petruchov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Miroslav Sopko": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Miroslav Sopko", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / J\u00e1n Marosz": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / J\u00e1n Marosz", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Elena \u010cerve\u0148\u00e1kov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Elena \u010cerve\u0148\u00e1kov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Nat\u00e1lia G\u00e1lisov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Nat\u00e1lia G\u00e1lisov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Michal \u0160ipo\u0161": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Michal \u0160ipo\u0161", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Daniel Lip\u0161ic": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Daniel Lip\u0161ic", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / G\u00e1bor Grendel": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / G\u00e1bor Grendel", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Marcel Klimek": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Marcel Klimek", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Viera Le\u0161\u010d\u00e1kov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Viera Le\u0161\u010d\u00e1kov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Tibor Hlavat\u00fd": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Tibor Hlavat\u00fd", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Milan Kuriak": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Milan Kuriak", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / \u013dubom\u00edr Klie\u0161tik": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / \u013dubom\u00edr Klie\u0161tik", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Peter Ziman": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Peter Ziman", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Anna \u0160mehilov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Anna \u0160mehilov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / M\u00e1ria Cehelsk\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / M\u00e1ria Cehelsk\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Eduard Heger": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Eduard Heger", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Mari\u00e1n Petro": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Mari\u00e1n Petro", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Radovan Ondrejka": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Radovan Ondrejka", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / J\u00e1n Her\u00e1k": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / J\u00e1n Her\u00e1k", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Peter Vons": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Peter Vons", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Zuzana Nebusov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Zuzana Nebusov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Patrik Miha\u013e": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Patrik Miha\u013e", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Hedviga Kurcinov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Hedviga Kurcinov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Anna Vargov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Anna Vargov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Michal Drotov\u00e1n": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Michal Drotov\u00e1n", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Obaidullah Mir": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Obaidullah Mir", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Richard Drutarovsk\u00fd": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Richard Drutarovsk\u00fd", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Peter Jur\u010dovi\u010d": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Peter Jur\u010dovi\u010d", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Peter Oremus": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Peter Oremus", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Milo\u0161 Svoboda": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Milo\u0161 Svoboda", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Marcela Ga\u0161ov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Marcela Ga\u0161ov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Marek K\u00fadela": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Marek K\u00fadela", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Milan J\u00e1n Pilip": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Milan J\u00e1n Pilip", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Milan Kaplan": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Milan Kaplan", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Marta Ivanov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Marta Ivanov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Jozef Luk\u00e1\u010d": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Jozef Luk\u00e1\u010d", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Marianna Kov\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Marianna Kov\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Du\u0161an Dechet": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Du\u0161an Dechet", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Vanda Rybansk\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Vanda Rybansk\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Rastislav Te\u0161ovi\u010d": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Rastislav Te\u0161ovi\u010d", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Juraj Lok\u0161a": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Juraj Lok\u0161a", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / O\u013ega Jaro\u0161ov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / O\u013ega Jaro\u0161ov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Jozef H\u00fcbel": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Jozef H\u00fcbel", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Milan Potock\u00fd": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Milan Potock\u00fd", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Adri\u00e1n Balog": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Adri\u00e1n Balog", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / R\u00f3bert Pajdlhauser": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / R\u00f3bert Pajdlhauser", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / R\u00f3bert Hal\u00e1k": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / R\u00f3bert Hal\u00e1k", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Jozef Vydra": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Jozef Vydra", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Peter Hochschorner": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Peter Hochschorner", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / J\u00e1n Brezovsk\u00fd": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / J\u00e1n Brezovsk\u00fd", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Radom\u00edr Kizek": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Radom\u00edr Kizek", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Eduard \u010conka": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Eduard \u010conka", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Jozef Bubn\u00e1r": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Jozef Bubn\u00e1r", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Peter Huba": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Peter Huba", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Marek Drimal": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Marek Drimal", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Vladim\u00edr Polakovi\u010d": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Vladim\u00edr Polakovi\u010d", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Stanislav Irs\u00e1k": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Stanislav Irs\u00e1k", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Katar\u00edna Ivani\u010dov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Katar\u00edna Ivani\u010dov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Vojtech Farka\u0161": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Vojtech Farka\u0161", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Elena Fatulov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Elena Fatulov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Peter Ol\u00e1\u0161": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Peter Ol\u00e1\u0161", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Iveta Noskov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Iveta Noskov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Pavol Jusko": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Pavol Jusko", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Janka Rindo\u0161ov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Janka Rindo\u0161ov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Henrieta Hrub\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Henrieta Hrub\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Peter Bet\u00e1k": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Peter Bet\u00e1k", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Roman Fajer": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Roman Fajer", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Roman Hvizd\u00e1k": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Roman Hvizd\u00e1k", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Mari\u00e1n Kali\u0161": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Mari\u00e1n Kali\u0161", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Mari\u00e1n Si\u010d\u00e1k": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Mari\u00e1n Si\u010d\u00e1k", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Tibor Ko\u010d\u00edk": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Tibor Ko\u010d\u00edk", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / \u013dubom\u00edr Je\u017eo": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / \u013dubom\u00edr Je\u017eo", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Iveta Zaremsk\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Iveta Zaremsk\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Ladislav M\u00e1\u0161ik": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Ladislav M\u00e1\u0161ik", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Lud\u011bk Vrt\u00edk": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Lud\u011bk Vrt\u00edk", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Peter Hrebik": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Peter Hrebik", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Vladim\u00edr Kr\u00e1tky": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Vladim\u00edr Kr\u00e1tky", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Pavol Blahovsk\u00fd": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Pavol Blahovsk\u00fd", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Marcel Mihalik": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Marcel Mihalik", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Matej Fab\u0161\u00edk": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Matej Fab\u0161\u00edk", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / J\u00e1n Budaj": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / J\u00e1n Budaj", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Marian Kubala": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Marian Kubala", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Franti\u0161ek H\u00f6ger": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Franti\u0161ek H\u00f6ger", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Anton Fri\u010d": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Anton Fri\u010d", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Mari\u00e1n G\u00e1lis": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Mari\u00e1n G\u00e1lis", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Vladim\u00edr Fe\u013ebaba": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Vladim\u00edr Fe\u013ebaba", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Caban": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Caban", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Marian Novota": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Marian Novota", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Mat\u00fa\u0161 Bystriansky": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Mat\u00fa\u0161 Bystriansky", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Gejza Farka\u0161": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Gejza Farka\u0161", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Igor Kraf\u010d\u00edk": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Igor Kraf\u010d\u00edk", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Kon\u0161tant\u00edn Javorsk\u00fd": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Kon\u0161tant\u00edn Javorsk\u00fd", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Rastislav Zimmermann": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Rastislav Zimmermann", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Martin Majdan": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Martin Majdan", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Martin Baranovi\u010d": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Martin Baranovi\u010d", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Martin \u0160eb\u00e1k": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Martin \u0160eb\u00e1k", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / J\u00e1n Sz\u00f6ll\u00f6s": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / J\u00e1n Sz\u00f6ll\u00f6s", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Eduard Mih\u00f3k": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Eduard Mih\u00f3k", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Ivan Uhr\u00edk": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Ivan Uhr\u00edk", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / \u017daneta Knotekov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / \u017daneta Knotekov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Viera Olbertov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Viera Olbertov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Juraj Pavl\u00edk": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Juraj Pavl\u00edk", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Patrik Lupt\u00e1k": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Patrik Lupt\u00e1k", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Peter Hub\u00e1\u010dek": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Peter Hub\u00e1\u010dek", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Viktor Ga\u017eo": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Viktor Ga\u017eo", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Henrich Ha\u0161\u010d\u00e1k": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Henrich Ha\u0161\u010d\u00e1k", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Henrieta Petrincov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Henrieta Petrincov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Dagmar Pupalov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Dagmar Pupalov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Eva Ivanovov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Eva Ivanovov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Lampart": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Lampart", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / \u0160tefan Goron": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / \u0160tefan Goron", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Patrik Me\u010d\u00e1r": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Patrik Me\u010d\u00e1r", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / R\u00f3bert Sit\u00e1r": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / R\u00f3bert Sit\u00e1r", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Milan Tom\u00edk": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Milan Tom\u00edk", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Franti\u0161ek Kov\u00e1\u010d": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Franti\u0161ek Kov\u00e1\u010d", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Erik Bukna": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Erik Bukna", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Andrej Holi\u010d": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Andrej Holi\u010d", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Roman Szil\u00e1gyi": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Roman Szil\u00e1gyi", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Jaroslav Hupka": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Jaroslav Hupka", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Roman Va\u0148o": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Roman Va\u0148o", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Marian Kol\u00e1\u010dek": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Marian Kol\u00e1\u010dek", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / J\u00e1n \u010ci\u010dmanec": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / J\u00e1n \u010ci\u010dmanec", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Tom\u00e1\u0161 \u0160tark": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Tom\u00e1\u0161 \u0160tark", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / R\u00f3bert Ma\u010dej": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / R\u00f3bert Ma\u010dej", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Milan Be\u0148o": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Milan Be\u0148o", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Adri\u00e1n Cup\u00e1k": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Adri\u00e1n Cup\u00e1k", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Pavol Le\u0161ko": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Pavol Le\u0161ko", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / \u0160tefan Tom\u00e1\u0161": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / \u0160tefan Tom\u00e1\u0161", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Anna Jakub\u00edkov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Anna Jakub\u00edkov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Jozef Halka": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Jozef Halka", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Michal Krav\u010d\u00edk": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Michal Krav\u010d\u00edk", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Igor Hra\u0161ko": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Igor Hra\u0161ko", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Janka \u0160\u00edpo\u0161ov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Janka \u0160\u00edpo\u0161ov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Peter Poll\u00e1k": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Peter Poll\u00e1k", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Helena Mezensk\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Helena Mezensk\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / J\u00e1n Mi\u010dovsk\u00fd": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / J\u00e1n Mi\u010dovsk\u00fd", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Richard Va\u0161e\u010dka": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Richard Va\u0161e\u010dka", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Eva Horv\u00e1thov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Eva Horv\u00e1thov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Martin Fecko": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Martin Fecko", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Jozef Viskupi\u010d": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Jozef Viskupi\u010d", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Erika Jurinov\u00e1": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Erika Jurinov\u00e1", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Igor Matovi\u010d": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Igor Matovi\u010d", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / \u013dudov\u00edt Kan\u00edk": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / \u013dudov\u00edt Kan\u00edk", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / J\u00e1n Gre\u0161\u0161o": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / J\u00e1n Gre\u0161\u0161o", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Tibor \u0160ag\u00e1t": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Tibor \u0160ag\u00e1t", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Martina J\u00e1no\u0161\u00edkov\u00e1": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Martina J\u00e1no\u0161\u00edkov\u00e1", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Rudolf Lachkovi\u010d": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Rudolf Lachkovi\u010d", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Erika Jankajov\u00e1": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Erika Jankajov\u00e1", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Pavol \u0160r\u00e1mek": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Pavol \u0160r\u00e1mek", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Anna Mierna": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Anna Mierna", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Marian Proch\u00e1zka": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Marian Proch\u00e1zka", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Jozef Weber": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Jozef Weber", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Jaroslav Pet\u00edk": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Jaroslav Pet\u00edk", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Miroslav Ondru\u0161": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Miroslav Ondru\u0161", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Du\u0161an Kme\u0165": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Du\u0161an Kme\u0165", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Emil Bartko": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Emil Bartko", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Vladim\u00edr Kokarda": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Vladim\u00edr Kokarda", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Pavol Kva\u010dkay": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Pavol Kva\u010dkay", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Stanislav \u0160koda": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Stanislav \u0160koda", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Jozef \u010cuha": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Jozef \u010cuha", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Juraj Ircha": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Juraj Ircha", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Vladim\u00edr S\u00e1dovsk\u00fd": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Vladim\u00edr S\u00e1dovsk\u00fd", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Milan Dvorsk\u00fd": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Milan Dvorsk\u00fd", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Marian Petrok": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Marian Petrok", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Michal R\u00f3za": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Michal R\u00f3za", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Radoslav Hodor": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Radoslav Hodor", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Eduard Valkovsk\u00fd": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Eduard Valkovsk\u00fd", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Milan N\u00e9meth": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Milan N\u00e9meth", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Ivan Mendrej": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Ivan Mendrej", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Jaroslav Dominik": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Jaroslav Dominik", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Matej Kulifaj": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Matej Kulifaj", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Slavom\u00edr Pirk": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Slavom\u00edr Pirk", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Igor Stupavsk\u00fd": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Igor Stupavsk\u00fd", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Martin Anto\u0161": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Martin Anto\u0161", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Martin Malicher": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Martin Malicher", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Martina Mat\u00fa\u0161ov\u00e1": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Martina Mat\u00fa\u0161ov\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / Eva Babitzov\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Eva Babitzov\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / Viliam Novotn\u00fd": "\u0160ANCA / Viliam Novotn\u00fd", "\u0160ANCA / Stanislav Horn\u00edk": "\u0160ANCA / Stanislav Horn\u00edk", "\u0160ANCA / Jaroslava Luka\u010dovi\u010dov\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Jaroslava Luka\u010dovi\u010dov\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / Szil\u00e1rd Both": "\u0160ANCA / Szil\u00e1rd Both", "\u0160ANCA / Jozef Mertan": "\u0160ANCA / Jozef Mertan", "\u0160ANCA / Daniel Balko": "\u0160ANCA / Daniel Balko", "\u0160ANCA / Emil Petrvalsk\u00fd": "\u0160ANCA / Emil Petrvalsk\u00fd", "\u0160ANCA / Ondrej Snopko": "\u0160ANCA / Ondrej Snopko", "\u0160ANCA / Franti\u0161ek O\u013eha": "\u0160ANCA / Franti\u0161ek O\u013eha", "\u0160ANCA / Pavol Petrovi\u010d": "\u0160ANCA / Pavol Petrovi\u010d", "\u0160ANCA / Jozef Repask\u00fd": "\u0160ANCA / Jozef Repask\u00fd", "\u0160ANCA / J\u00e1n Berceli": "\u0160ANCA / J\u00e1n Berceli", "\u0160ANCA / Iveta Kijevsk\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Iveta Kijevsk\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / Michal Vr\u00e1b": "\u0160ANCA / Michal Vr\u00e1b", "\u0160ANCA / Marian Keru\u013e": "\u0160ANCA / Marian Keru\u013e", "\u0160ANCA / Roman Luk\u00e1\u010d": "\u0160ANCA / Roman Luk\u00e1\u010d", "\u0160ANCA / Peter Orvo\u0161": "\u0160ANCA / Peter Orvo\u0161", "\u0160ANCA / Pavel Po\u017eoni": "\u0160ANCA / Pavel Po\u017eoni", "\u0160ANCA / Peter Novovesk\u00fd": "\u0160ANCA / Peter Novovesk\u00fd", "\u0160ANCA / Vladislav Oravec": "\u0160ANCA / Vladislav Oravec", "\u0160ANCA / Matej \u0160arock\u00fd": "\u0160ANCA / Matej \u0160arock\u00fd", "\u0160ANCA / \u0160tefan Schnitzer": "\u0160ANCA / \u0160tefan Schnitzer", "\u0160ANCA / Marek Ko\u0161uda": "\u0160ANCA / Marek Ko\u0161uda", "\u0160ANCA / Erik Trella": "\u0160ANCA / Erik Trella", "\u0160ANCA / Viera Gondov\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Viera Gondov\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / Peter Baran\u010dik": "\u0160ANCA / Peter Baran\u010dik", "\u0160ANCA / Radovan Balogh": "\u0160ANCA / Radovan Balogh", "\u0160ANCA / Ivan Mur\u00edn": "\u0160ANCA / Ivan Mur\u00edn", "\u0160ANCA / \u013dubom\u00edr Mi\u010d\u00fach": "\u0160ANCA / \u013dubom\u00edr Mi\u010d\u00fach", "\u0160ANCA / \u0160tefan Bur\u00e1nsky": "\u0160ANCA / \u0160tefan Bur\u00e1nsky", "\u0160ANCA / \u0160imon Hen\u010del": "\u0160ANCA / \u0160imon Hen\u010del", "\u0160ANCA / J\u00e1n Vrabe\u013e": "\u0160ANCA / J\u00e1n Vrabe\u013e", "\u0160ANCA / Mauricio Espinosa": "\u0160ANCA / Mauricio Espinosa", "\u0160ANCA / Peter Labanc": "\u0160ANCA / Peter Labanc", "\u0160ANCA / Milan Smi\u017eansk\u00fd": "\u0160ANCA / Milan Smi\u017eansk\u00fd", "\u0160ANCA / Darina Antol\u00edkov\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Darina Antol\u00edkov\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / Jaroslava Novotn\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Jaroslava Novotn\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / Al\u017ebeta Rig\u00e1\u0148ov\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Al\u017ebeta Rig\u00e1\u0148ov\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / Michal Gajdo\u0161": "\u0160ANCA / Michal Gajdo\u0161", "\u0160ANCA / Ondrej Potan\u010dok": "\u0160ANCA / Ondrej Potan\u010dok", "\u0160ANCA / Marian B\u00f6lcs": "\u0160ANCA / Marian B\u00f6lcs", "\u0160ANCA / Patrik Anina": "\u0160ANCA / Patrik Anina", "\u0160ANCA / Jozef Kre\u0161\u00e1k": "\u0160ANCA / Jozef Kre\u0161\u00e1k", "\u0160ANCA / Jaroslav Nem\u010d\u00edk": "\u0160ANCA / Jaroslav Nem\u010d\u00edk", "\u0160ANCA / Ivana Avdijov\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Ivana Avdijov\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / Juraj Cap": "\u0160ANCA / Juraj Cap", "\u0160ANCA / J\u00e1n I\u017edinsk\u00fd": "\u0160ANCA / J\u00e1n I\u017edinsk\u00fd", "\u0160ANCA / Zlatica Horv\u00e1tov\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Zlatica Horv\u00e1tov\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / Alexander Held": "\u0160ANCA / Alexander Held", "\u0160ANCA / Ivan Dobrotka": "\u0160ANCA / Ivan Dobrotka", "\u0160ANCA / Mari\u00e1n F\u00farik": "\u0160ANCA / Mari\u00e1n F\u00farik", "\u0160ANCA / Ren\u00e1ta Klaukov\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Ren\u00e1ta Klaukov\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / Juraj Holubek": "\u0160ANCA / Juraj Holubek", "\u0160ANCA / Vikt\u00f3ria Kozelov\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Vikt\u00f3ria Kozelov\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / \u013dubom\u00edr Straka": "\u0160ANCA / \u013dubom\u00edr Straka", "\u0160ANCA / Jana Ignacikov\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Jana Ignacikov\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / Miroslav Vidovenec": "\u0160ANCA / Miroslav Vidovenec", "\u0160ANCA / Erika Lamperov\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Erika Lamperov\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / Peter Kri\u017e": "\u0160ANCA / Peter Kri\u017e", "\u0160ANCA / Marek Farka\u0161": "\u0160ANCA / Marek Farka\u0161", "\u0160ANCA / Martin \u0160ev\u010d\u00edk": "\u0160ANCA / Martin \u0160ev\u010d\u00edk", "\u0160ANCA / Peter Lu\u010div\u0148\u00e1k": "\u0160ANCA / Peter Lu\u010div\u0148\u00e1k", "\u0160ANCA / Peter Alf\u00f6ldi": "\u0160ANCA / Peter Alf\u00f6ldi", "\u0160ANCA / Eva Oravcov\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Eva Oravcov\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / Peter Hajd\u00fa": "\u0160ANCA / Peter Hajd\u00fa", "\u0160ANCA / Martina M\u00e9sz\u00e1ros Bariakov\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Martina M\u00e9sz\u00e1ros Bariakov\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / J\u00e1n Laco": "\u0160ANCA / J\u00e1n Laco", "\u0160ANCA / J\u00e1n Hroman\u00edk": "\u0160ANCA / J\u00e1n Hroman\u00edk", "\u0160ANCA / Dominika Krn\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Dominika Krn\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / Slavko Ondo": "\u0160ANCA / Slavko Ondo", "\u0160ANCA / Jana Ve\u010dern\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Jana Ve\u010dern\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / Michaela Ambr\u00fasov\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Michaela Ambr\u00fasov\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / Marta Cyprichov\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Marta Cyprichov\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / D\u00e1vid Ka\u0161\u010d\u00e1k": "\u0160ANCA / D\u00e1vid Ka\u0161\u010d\u00e1k", "\u0160ANCA / J\u00e1n Miku\u0161": "\u0160ANCA / J\u00e1n Miku\u0161", "\u0160ANCA / Katar\u00edna Metzgerov\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Katar\u00edna Metzgerov\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / Matej Ba\u0148as": "\u0160ANCA / Matej Ba\u0148as", "\u0160ANCA / Iveta Golmicov\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Iveta Golmicov\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / Miroslav Sekere\u0161": "\u0160ANCA / Miroslav Sekere\u0161", "\u0160ANCA / Mari\u00e1n Pi\u0148ko": "\u0160ANCA / Mari\u00e1n Pi\u0148ko", "\u0160ANCA / Gust\u00e1v Voda": "\u0160ANCA / Gust\u00e1v Voda", "\u0160ANCA / Miroslav Sako": "\u0160ANCA / Miroslav Sako", "\u0160ANCA / Danka Tom\u00e1\u0161ov\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Danka Tom\u00e1\u0161ov\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / R\u00f3bert Ambro\u017e": "\u0160ANCA / R\u00f3bert Ambro\u017e", "\u0160ANCA / Marcel Z\u00e1hor\u010d\u00e1k": "\u0160ANCA / Marcel Z\u00e1hor\u010d\u00e1k", "\u0160ANCA / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Krahulec": "\u0160ANCA / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Krahulec", "\u0160ANCA / Peter Py\u0161n\u00fd": "\u0160ANCA / Peter Py\u0161n\u00fd", "\u0160ANCA / Marek Borodin": "\u0160ANCA / Marek Borodin", "\u0160ANCA / Mat\u00fa\u0161 Gajdo\u0161": "\u0160ANCA / Mat\u00fa\u0161 Gajdo\u0161", "\u0160ANCA / Alena Ivaneck\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Alena Ivaneck\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / Du\u0161an Marko": "\u0160ANCA / Du\u0161an Marko", "\u0160ANCA / Monika Poljakov\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Monika Poljakov\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / Marian Valach": "\u0160ANCA / Marian Valach", "\u0160ANCA / Marek Doj\u010d\u00e1n": "\u0160ANCA / Marek Doj\u010d\u00e1n", "\u0160ANCA / Peter Ilavsk\u00fd": "\u0160ANCA / Peter Ilavsk\u00fd", "\u0160ANCA / Peter Mertan": "\u0160ANCA / Peter Mertan", "\u0160ANCA / Marianna \u0160abov\u00e1": "\u0160ANCA / Marianna \u0160abov\u00e1", "\u0160ANCA / Miroslav Mat\u00fa\u0161ka": "\u0160ANCA / Miroslav Mat\u00fa\u0161ka", "\u0160ANCA / Vladim\u00edr T\u00fary": "\u0160ANCA / Vladim\u00edr T\u00fary", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Boris Koll\u00e1r": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Boris Koll\u00e1r", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Milan Krajniak": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Milan Krajniak", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Martina \u0160imkovi\u010dov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Martina \u0160imkovi\u010dov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter Mar\u010dek": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter Mar\u010dek", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Petra Kri\u0161t\u00fafkov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Petra Kri\u0161t\u00fafkov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter P\u010dolinsk\u00fd": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter P\u010dolinsk\u00fd", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Rastislav Hol\u00fabek": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Rastislav Hol\u00fabek", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter \u0160tarcho\u0148": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter \u0160tarcho\u0148", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / \u013dudov\u00edt Goga": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / \u013dudov\u00edt Goga", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Zuzana \u0160ebov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Zuzana \u0160ebov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Adriana P\u010dolinsk\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Adriana P\u010dolinsk\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Michal Hynek": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Michal Hynek", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Roman Malovec": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Roman Malovec", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Mat\u00fa\u0161 Vi\u0161\u0148ovsk\u00fd": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Mat\u00fa\u0161 Vi\u0161\u0148ovsk\u00fd", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / D\u00e1vid Tar\u010d\u00e1k": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / D\u00e1vid Tar\u010d\u00e1k", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Oskar Dobrovodsk\u00fd": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Oskar Dobrovodsk\u00fd", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Gizela Kev\u00e9lyov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Gizela Kev\u00e9lyov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Andrej Por\u00e1zik": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Andrej Por\u00e1zik", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter Pavelko": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter Pavelko", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Janka Krausov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Janka Krausov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / M\u00e1ria Kubov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / M\u00e1ria Kubov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Filip Mlynar\u010d\u00edk": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Filip Mlynar\u010d\u00edk", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Roman \u0160mida": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Roman \u0160mida", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Eva Hudecov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Eva Hudecov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Martin Dzielavsk\u00fd": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Martin Dzielavsk\u00fd", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Miloslav Hr\u00e1dek": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Miloslav Hr\u00e1dek", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Radovan Mi\u010dunek": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Radovan Mi\u010dunek", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / R\u00f3bert Mam\u010dak": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / R\u00f3bert Mam\u010dak", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / \u013dubica Mur\u00ednov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / \u013dubica Mur\u00ednov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / O\u013ega Nov\u00e1kov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / O\u013ega Nov\u00e1kov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / J\u00falius Chovanec": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / J\u00falius Chovanec", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Pavol August\u00edn": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Pavol August\u00edn", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Viliam Kandra": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Viliam Kandra", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Silvia Hrickov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Silvia Hrickov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter Mudroch": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter Mudroch", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Alexander S\u0171t\u00f6": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Alexander S\u0171t\u00f6", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / J\u00e1n Marcin": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / J\u00e1n Marcin", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Vlasta Hrin\u00edkov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Vlasta Hrin\u00edkov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Regan Belovi\u010d": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Regan Belovi\u010d", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Filip Farka": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Filip Farka", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / \u013dubom\u00edr Mal\u00e1k": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / \u013dubom\u00edr Mal\u00e1k", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Michal Hesoun": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Michal Hesoun", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Lenka Hierzer \u0160tiber": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Lenka Hierzer \u0160tiber", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Martin Malatin": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Martin Malatin", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Rastislav \u0160aling": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Rastislav \u0160aling", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Milo\u0161 Ku\u010dera": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Milo\u0161 Ku\u010dera", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Korn\u00e9lia Kemenck\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Korn\u00e9lia Kemenck\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Vladim\u00edr Omasta": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Vladim\u00edr Omasta", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Kahan": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Kahan", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Henrieta Minichov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Henrieta Minichov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Veronika Tom\u00edkov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Veronika Tom\u00edkov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Jaroslav Karahuta": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Jaroslav Karahuta", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Martina Li\u0161kov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Martina Li\u0161kov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / J\u00falius Gy\u00f6ry": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / J\u00falius Gy\u00f6ry", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Andrej Va\u0161ko": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Andrej Va\u0161ko", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Josef Va\u0161uta": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Josef Va\u0161uta", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter \u010eurikovi\u010d": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter \u010eurikovi\u010d", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter Varga": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter Varga", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / J\u00e1n Pa\u0161ko": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / J\u00e1n Pa\u0161ko", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Miloslav Hette\u0161": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Miloslav Hette\u0161", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Vladim\u00edra Hanicov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Vladim\u00edra Hanicov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / \u013duba Markov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / \u013duba Markov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Martin Rusn\u00e1k": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Martin Rusn\u00e1k", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Marek Dani\u0161": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Marek Dani\u0161", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Pavol Doktor": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Pavol Doktor", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Andrea Kraj\u010diov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Andrea Kraj\u010diov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Andrej Roman": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Andrej Roman", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Silvia Pint\u00e9rov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Silvia Pint\u00e9rov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Jakub Tinka": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Jakub Tinka", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / R\u00f3bert Rozgo\u0148": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / R\u00f3bert Rozgo\u0148", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Marcela Sarkocyov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Marcela Sarkocyov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Katar\u00edna Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Katar\u00edna Pol\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Lambert Kajanovi\u010d": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Lambert Kajanovi\u010d", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Michal Vic\u00e1\u0148": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Michal Vic\u00e1\u0148", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Gabriela Fiedorov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Gabriela Fiedorov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Miroslav Klobu\u0161ick\u00fd": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Miroslav Klobu\u0161ick\u00fd", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Radoslav Balick\u00fd": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Radoslav Balick\u00fd", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter Socha": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter Socha", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Juraj Mikler": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Juraj Mikler", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Boris Kuzmick\u00fd": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Boris Kuzmick\u00fd", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Dalibor Krav\u00e1rik": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Dalibor Krav\u00e1rik", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Roman \u017divojinov": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Roman \u017divojinov", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter Hricko": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter Hricko", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Igor Hur\u010d\u00edk": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Igor Hur\u010d\u00edk", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Du\u0161an Bo\u017eek": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Du\u0161an Bo\u017eek", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Andrea \u010cajkovi\u010dov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Andrea \u010cajkovi\u010dov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Du\u0161an Daxner": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Du\u0161an Daxner", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / R\u00f3bert L\u00e1ska": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / R\u00f3bert L\u00e1ska", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Karol Hanic": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Karol Hanic", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Patrik Svediak": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Patrik Svediak", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Lonc": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Lonc", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Adriana Kov\u00e1csov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Adriana Kov\u00e1csov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Dalibor Steindl": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Dalibor Steindl", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Patrik Polakovi\u010d": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Patrik Polakovi\u010d", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter Nagy": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter Nagy", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Ingrid Janotkov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Ingrid Janotkov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Jozef Le\u0161ko": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Jozef Le\u0161ko", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Libu\u0161a Val\u00fachov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Libu\u0161a Val\u00fachov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Eduard Morav\u010d\u00edk": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Eduard Morav\u010d\u00edk", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Miroslav Bauer": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Miroslav Bauer", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Andrea Darnadiov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Andrea Darnadiov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter \u0160utl\u00e1k": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter \u0160utl\u00e1k", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / \u013dubo\u0161 Drg\u00e1\u0148": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / \u013dubo\u0161 Drg\u00e1\u0148", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Milan Remen\u00e1r": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Milan Remen\u00e1r", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter Kunc": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Peter Kunc", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Martin Brad\u00e1\u010d": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Martin Brad\u00e1\u010d", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Martin \u010cervenka": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Martin \u010cervenka", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Milan Moln\u00e1r": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Milan Moln\u00e1r", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / \u0160tefan Kev\u00e9ly": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / \u0160tefan Kev\u00e9ly", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Zuzana Mrk\u00e1vkov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Zuzana Mrk\u00e1vkov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Franti\u0161ek Reiner": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Franti\u0161ek Reiner", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Marek Gligani\u010d": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Marek Gligani\u010d", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Nata\u0161a Bittnerov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Nata\u0161a Bittnerov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Jana Dem\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Jana Dem\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Erika Theodorakakuov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Erika Theodorakakuov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / J\u00e1n Polomsk\u00fd": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / J\u00e1n Polomsk\u00fd", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Juraj Ivani\u010dka": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Juraj Ivani\u010dka", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Milan Vetr\u00e1k": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Milan Vetr\u00e1k", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Patrik Pavuk": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Patrik Pavuk", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Zuzana \u0160imov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Zuzana \u0160imov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / \u013dubo\u0161 \u0160uca": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / \u013dubo\u0161 \u0160uca", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Janka Petrikov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Janka Petrikov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Roman \u0160tef\u00e1nik": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Roman \u0160tef\u00e1nik", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Zlatica Bocchini": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Zlatica Bocchini", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Helena Ufn\u00e1rov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Helena Ufn\u00e1rov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Barbora Slez\u00e1kov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Barbora Slez\u00e1kov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Anna Mar\u0165\u00e1kov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Anna Mar\u0165\u00e1kov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Marcel \u0160ejvl": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Marcel \u0160ejvl", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Marek Zemko": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Marek Zemko", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Mari\u00e1n Oravec": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Mari\u00e1n Oravec", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Viera Pa\u013eov\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Viera Pa\u013eov\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Milan Hulvej": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Milan Hulvej", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Franti\u0161ek Kmec": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Franti\u0161ek Kmec", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Richard Rosival": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Richard Rosival", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / R\u00f3bert Hus\u00e1r": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / R\u00f3bert Hus\u00e1r", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Branislav Petr\u00edk": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Branislav Petr\u00edk", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Andrej Mich\u0148\u00e1k": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Andrej Mich\u0148\u00e1k", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / J\u00e1n Jedin\u00e1k": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / J\u00e1n Jedin\u00e1k", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / J\u00e1n Kalaf\u00fas": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / J\u00e1n Kalaf\u00fas", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / \u013duboslav Chvasta": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / \u013duboslav Chvasta", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Franti\u0161ek \u0160tof\u00edk": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Franti\u0161ek \u0160tof\u00edk", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Ondrej \u0160tefik": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Ondrej \u0160tefik", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Franti\u0161ek Maslo": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Franti\u0161ek Maslo", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Jaroslav Kolib\u00edk": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Jaroslav Kolib\u00edk", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Roman Frankovsk\u00fd": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Roman Frankovsk\u00fd", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Vladim\u00edr Melicher": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Vladim\u00edr Melicher", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Rastislav Kvet\u00e1k": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Rastislav Kvet\u00e1k", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Na\u010fa \u010ci\u010d\u00e1kov\u00e1": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Na\u010fa \u010ci\u010d\u00e1kov\u00e1", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / J\u00e1n Dzurik": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / J\u00e1n Dzurik", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Juraj Vavr\u00edk": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Juraj Vavr\u00edk", "SZS / Nat\u00e1lia Hanul\u00edkov\u00e1": "SZS / Nat\u00e1lia Hanul\u00edkov\u00e1", "SZS / Martin \u010culen": "SZS / Martin \u010culen", "SZS / Dana Kobidov\u00e1": "SZS / Dana Kobidov\u00e1", "SZS / Rastislav Vel\u010dek": "SZS / Rastislav Vel\u010dek", "SZS / Nora P\u00e1nikov\u00e1": "SZS / Nora P\u00e1nikov\u00e1", "SZS / Milan Kov\u00e1\u010dik": "SZS / Milan Kov\u00e1\u010dik", "SZS / O\u013ega Hru\u0161kov\u00e1": "SZS / O\u013ega Hru\u0161kov\u00e1", "SZS / Roman Koll\u00e1r": "SZS / Roman Koll\u00e1r", "SZS / Darina Kri\u017e\u00e1kov\u00e1": "SZS / Darina Kri\u017e\u00e1kov\u00e1", "SZS / Juraj Kuku\u010dka": "SZS / Juraj Kuku\u010dka", "SZS / Erika Malatincov\u00e1": "SZS / Erika Malatincov\u00e1", "SZS / Martin Valent": "SZS / Martin Valent", "SZS / M\u00e1ria \u0160tekl\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1": "SZS / M\u00e1ria \u0160tekl\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1", "SZS / \u013dubo\u0161 Michal\u00edk": "SZS / \u013dubo\u0161 Michal\u00edk", "SZS / Darina Ninisov\u00e1": "SZS / Darina Ninisov\u00e1", "SZS / Michal Vavro": "SZS / Michal Vavro", "SZS / Marta Ga\u0161parovi\u010dov\u00e1": "SZS / Marta Ga\u0161parovi\u010dov\u00e1", "SZS / Milan Branick\u00fd": "SZS / Milan Branick\u00fd", "SZS / Jarmila Petrovi\u010dov\u00e1": "SZS / Jarmila Petrovi\u010dov\u00e1", "SZS / Gabriel Gajdo\u0161": "SZS / Gabriel Gajdo\u0161", "SZS / Silvia Mackovi\u010dov\u00e1": "SZS / Silvia Mackovi\u010dov\u00e1", "SZS / Anton Juri\u0161": "SZS / Anton Juri\u0161", "SZS / M\u00e1ria Tomanov\u00e1": "SZS / M\u00e1ria Tomanov\u00e1", "SZS / Miroslav Koll\u00e1r": "SZS / Miroslav Koll\u00e1r", "SZS / S\u00e1ra Hanul\u00edkov\u00e1": "SZS / S\u00e1ra Hanul\u00edkov\u00e1", "SZS / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Figa": "SZS / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Figa", "SZS / Andrea Benkov\u00e1": "SZS / Andrea Benkov\u00e1", "SZS / Kristi\u00e1n Hoffmann": "SZS / Kristi\u00e1n Hoffmann", "SZS / Janka Ritomsk\u00e1": "SZS / Janka Ritomsk\u00e1", "SZS / Ioan Brencus": "SZS / Ioan Brencus", "SZS / Katar\u00edna Ga\u0161par\u00edkov\u00e1": "SZS / Katar\u00edna Ga\u0161par\u00edkov\u00e1", "SZS / Milan Antal\u00edk": "SZS / Milan Antal\u00edk", "SZS / Viera Sebinov\u00e1": "SZS / Viera Sebinov\u00e1", "SZS / Jozef Grond\u017e\u00e1k": "SZS / Jozef Grond\u017e\u00e1k", "SZS / Veronika V\u00e1gnerov\u00e1": "SZS / Veronika V\u00e1gnerov\u00e1", "SZS / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Majer": "SZS / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Majer", "SZS / Zdenka Slukov\u00e1": "SZS / Zdenka Slukov\u00e1", "SZS / Milan Proksa": "SZS / Milan Proksa", "SZS / M\u00e1ria Bedn\u00e1rov\u00e1": "SZS / M\u00e1ria Bedn\u00e1rov\u00e1", "SZS / Michal Poruban": "SZS / Michal Poruban", "SZS / Beata Bakajszov\u00e1": "SZS / Beata Bakajszov\u00e1", "SZS / Anton Kr\u00e1\u013eovi\u010d": "SZS / Anton Kr\u00e1\u013eovi\u010d", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Ondrej Kloko\u010d": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Ondrej Kloko\u010d", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Roman Ruhig": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Roman Ruhig", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Andrej Trnovec": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Andrej Trnovec", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Pavel Marko": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Pavel Marko", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Andrej Richn\u00e1k": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Andrej Richn\u00e1k", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Ren\u00e1ta Knezovi\u0107": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Ren\u00e1ta Knezovi\u0107", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Peter Fut\u00e1\u0161": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Peter Fut\u00e1\u0161", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Rudolf Steigauf": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Rudolf Steigauf", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / M\u00e1ria Javorekov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / M\u00e1ria Javorekov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Gabriela Lacu\u0161ov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Gabriela Lacu\u0161ov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Vladim\u00edr Mal\u00fd": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Vladim\u00edr Mal\u00fd", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Peter Moln\u00e1r": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Peter Moln\u00e1r", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / \u013dubica Krek\u00e1\u0148ov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / \u013dubica Krek\u00e1\u0148ov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Rastislav Kuzma": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Rastislav Kuzma", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Anna Pla\u010dkov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Anna Pla\u010dkov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Patr\u00edcia Brestovansk\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Patr\u00edcia Brestovansk\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Miroslav Pil\u010dik": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Miroslav Pil\u010dik", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Milan Kyse\u013e": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Milan Kyse\u013e", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Adri\u00e1na Ma\u0161kov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Adri\u00e1na Ma\u0161kov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / So\u0148a Bilkov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / So\u0148a Bilkov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Monika Matl\u00e1kov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Monika Matl\u00e1kov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Iveta Kurillov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Iveta Kurillov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Marian K\u0148a\u017eko": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Marian K\u0148a\u017eko", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef Bocan": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef Bocan", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef Gajdo\u0161": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef Gajdo\u0161", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Viera Lea Slivkov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Viera Lea Slivkov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Richard Burkovsk\u00fd": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Richard Burkovsk\u00fd", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Milan Pra\u0161ovsk\u00fd": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Milan Pra\u0161ovsk\u00fd", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef Ko\u0161i\u010diar": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef Ko\u0161i\u010diar", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Estera S\u00e1sikov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Estera S\u00e1sikov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef Valovi\u010d": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef Valovi\u010d", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Helena \u0160tibelov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Helena \u0160tibelov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Anna Kr\u010dm\u00e1rikov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Anna Kr\u010dm\u00e1rikov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Juraj Galbav\u00fd": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Juraj Galbav\u00fd", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Ferdinand Peth\u00f6": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Ferdinand Peth\u00f6", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Viliam Zopp": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Viliam Zopp", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Anna Jablonovsk\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Anna Jablonovsk\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef Le\u0161ko": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef Le\u0161ko", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / \u013dubom\u00edr Zub\u010d\u00e1k": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / \u013dubom\u00edr Zub\u010d\u00e1k", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Zuzana Gallov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Zuzana Gallov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Vladim\u00edr Rosinsk\u00fd": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Vladim\u00edr Rosinsk\u00fd", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / \u013dubom\u00edr Tak\u00e1\u010d": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / \u013dubom\u00edr Tak\u00e1\u010d", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Du\u0161an \u010euri\u0161ka": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Du\u0161an \u010euri\u0161ka", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Du\u0161an Ke\u010dk\u00e9\u0161": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Du\u0161an Ke\u010dk\u00e9\u0161", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Igor \u010eurana": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Igor \u010eurana", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Peter Kol\u00e1roci": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Peter Kol\u00e1roci", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Oto Ba\u010da": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Oto Ba\u010da", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef Jendrek": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef Jendrek", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Du\u0161an Pohorelec": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Du\u0161an Pohorelec", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Vladim\u00edr \u0160ipo\u0161": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Vladim\u00edr \u0160ipo\u0161", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Juraj Pivka": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Juraj Pivka", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Marek Lipovsk\u00fd": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Marek Lipovsk\u00fd", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Martin Re\u017e\u0148\u00e1k": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Martin Re\u017e\u0148\u00e1k", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jana Pokorn\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jana Pokorn\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / J\u00e1n Jambrich": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / J\u00e1n Jambrich", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef Petrus": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef Petrus", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / J\u00e1n Dil\u00edk": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / J\u00e1n Dil\u00edk", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Ivan \u0164apu\u0161\u00edk": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Ivan \u0164apu\u0161\u00edk", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Roman \u0160trba": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Roman \u0160trba", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Oxana Tk\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Oxana Tk\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Ondrej Drugda": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Ondrej Drugda", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Peter Podmajersk\u00fd": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Peter Podmajersk\u00fd", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Peter P\u00e1nik": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Peter P\u00e1nik", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / \u0160tefan Mi\u0161\u010d\u00edk": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / \u0160tefan Mi\u0161\u010d\u00edk", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Pavol Goda": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Pavol Goda", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Dominik Angyal": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Dominik Angyal", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Franti\u0161ek Kelemen": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Franti\u0161ek Kelemen", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Ondrej Kaduk": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Ondrej Kaduk", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef \u017dabka": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef \u017dabka", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Dagmar Kraj\u010dovi\u010dov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Dagmar Kraj\u010dovi\u010dov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jaroslav Feh\u00e9rv\u00e1ri": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jaroslav Feh\u00e9rv\u00e1ri", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Igor Lacko": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Igor Lacko", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Milan Gun\u00e1r": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Milan Gun\u00e1r", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / M\u00e1ria Slivov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / M\u00e1ria Slivov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / J\u00e1n Hiraj": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / J\u00e1n Hiraj", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Darina Lorin\u010d\u00e1kov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Darina Lorin\u010d\u00e1kov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Priska T\u00f3thov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Priska T\u00f3thov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef Choluj": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef Choluj", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Gabriela Balajov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Gabriela Balajov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Daniela Dlaskov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Daniela Dlaskov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / J\u00e1n Petr\u00edk": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / J\u00e1n Petr\u00edk", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef\u00edna Hatalov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef\u00edna Hatalov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Eva Opinov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Eva Opinov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Anna Luteran\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Anna Luteran\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Viliam Sedl\u00e1k": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Viliam Sedl\u00e1k", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef Maga\u010d": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef Maga\u010d", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Branislav Kubica": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Branislav Kubica", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jaroslav Podol\u00e1k": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jaroslav Podol\u00e1k", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / O\u013ega Grozdani\u010dov\u00e1": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / O\u013ega Grozdani\u010dov\u00e1", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef Danko": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef Danko", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef S\u00e1sik": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Jozef S\u00e1sik", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Csaba Feh\u00e9r": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Csaba Feh\u00e9r", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Istv\u00e1n M\u00e1zik": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Istv\u00e1n M\u00e1zik", "MKDA-MKDSZ / K\u00e1roly Drap\u00e1k": "MKDA-MKDSZ / K\u00e1roly Drap\u00e1k", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Peter Havasi": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Peter Havasi", "MKDA-MKDSZ / O\u013ega Mrvov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / O\u013ega Mrvov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Peter Gornyitzki": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Peter Gornyitzki", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Ajnacska B. Nagy": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Ajnacska B. Nagy", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Attila Kardo\u0161": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Attila Kardo\u0161", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Gergely Bart\u00f3k": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Gergely Bart\u00f3k", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Franti\u0161ek Turansk\u00fd": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Franti\u0161ek Turansk\u00fd", "MKDA-MKDSZ / \u0160tefan Juh\u00e1sz": "MKDA-MKDSZ / \u0160tefan Juh\u00e1sz", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Ladislav Bart\u00f3k": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Ladislav Bart\u00f3k", "MKDA-MKDSZ / J\u00e1n Allar\u00e1m": "MKDA-MKDSZ / J\u00e1n Allar\u00e1m", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Eva Jur\u010d\u00e1kov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Eva Jur\u010d\u00e1kov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Katar\u00edna Botl\u00f3ov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Katar\u00edna Botl\u00f3ov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Marcel Fagyas": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Marcel Fagyas", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Franti\u0161ek Timko": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Franti\u0161ek Timko", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Ladislav Morvay": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Ladislav Morvay", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Melinda Vicena": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Melinda Vicena", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Csaba K\u00e1poszt\u00e1s": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Csaba K\u00e1poszt\u00e1s", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Viktor Mu\u0161\u0161\u00e1k": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Viktor Mu\u0161\u0161\u00e1k", "MKDA-MKDSZ / M\u00f3nika Mar\u00e1z": "MKDA-MKDSZ / M\u00f3nika Mar\u00e1z", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Alexander V\u00e9gh": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Alexander V\u00e9gh", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Franti\u0161ek Kendi": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Franti\u0161ek Kendi", "MKDA-MKDSZ / J\u00e1cint Kecskem\u00e9ti": "MKDA-MKDSZ / J\u00e1cint Kecskem\u00e9ti", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Jozef S\u00e1rk\u00f6zi": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Jozef S\u00e1rk\u00f6zi", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Anna Doczyov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Anna Doczyov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Nora Borb\u00e9lyov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Nora Borb\u00e9lyov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Oliv\u00e9r Nagy": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Oliv\u00e9r Nagy", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Kov\u00e1cs": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Kov\u00e1cs", "MKDA-MKDSZ / G\u00e1bor Piski": "MKDA-MKDSZ / G\u00e1bor Piski", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Jozef P\u00e1l": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Jozef P\u00e1l", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Magdal\u00e9na Dob\u00f3ov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Magdal\u00e9na Dob\u00f3ov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Anik\u00f3 Nagyov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Anik\u00f3 Nagyov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Ondrej Fajd": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Ondrej Fajd", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Roland Nadick\u00fd": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Roland Nadick\u00fd", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Tibor Hloska": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Tibor Hloska", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Ladislav Kov\u00e1cs": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Ladislav Kov\u00e1cs", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Nikoleta Orvo\u0161ov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Nikoleta Orvo\u0161ov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Zsolt Szalay": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Zsolt Szalay", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Jozef Mih\u00e1ly": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Jozef Mih\u00e1ly", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Norbert Bacskai": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Norbert Bacskai", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Veronika Zsolnayov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Veronika Zsolnayov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Jozef Brauis": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Jozef Brauis", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Edita Riczo Prib\u00e9kov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Edita Riczo Prib\u00e9kov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Judita Nagyov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Judita Nagyov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Gell\u00e9rt Mag": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Gell\u00e9rt Mag", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Monika Rag\u00e1nyov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Monika Rag\u00e1nyov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Janka Cimoradsk\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Janka Cimoradsk\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Mikul\u00e1\u0161 Kriv\u00e1nsky": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Mikul\u00e1\u0161 Kriv\u00e1nsky", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Alojz Rig\u00f3": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Alojz Rig\u00f3", "MKDA-MKDSZ / T\u00edmea Oroszl\u00e1nyov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / T\u00edmea Oroszl\u00e1nyov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / \u00c9va V\u00e1rady G\u00e1l": "MKDA-MKDSZ / \u00c9va V\u00e1rady G\u00e1l", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Imrich Hegyi": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Imrich Hegyi", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Szil\u00e1rd Bug\u00e1r": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Szil\u00e1rd Bug\u00e1r", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Robert Zupko": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Robert Zupko", "MKDA-MKDSZ / J\u00e1n Orvo\u0161": "MKDA-MKDSZ / J\u00e1n Orvo\u0161", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Ladislav F\u00fczes": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Ladislav F\u00fczes", "MKDA-MKDSZ / \u013dudov\u00edt Szab\u00f3": "MKDA-MKDSZ / \u013dudov\u00edt Szab\u00f3", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Magdal\u00e9na Dankov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Magdal\u00e9na Dankov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / S\u00e1ndor Juh\u00e1sz": "MKDA-MKDSZ / S\u00e1ndor Juh\u00e1sz", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Zuzana \u00c1d\u00e1mov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Zuzana \u00c1d\u00e1mov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / J\u00e1n Allar\u00e1m.1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / J\u00e1n Allar\u00e1m.1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Gy\u00f6ngyike Kov\u00e1csov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Gy\u00f6ngyike Kov\u00e1csov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / \u0160tefan Sallai": "MKDA-MKDSZ / \u0160tefan Sallai", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Eva Kolberov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Eva Kolberov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Erika \u00c1d\u00e1mov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Erika \u00c1d\u00e1mov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Zolt\u00e1n Tak\u00e1cs": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Zolt\u00e1n Tak\u00e1cs", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Buris": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Buris", "MKDA-MKDSZ / M\u00e1ria Munkov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / M\u00e1ria Munkov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Michal Pankovics": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Michal Pankovics", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Val\u00e9r Viderman": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Val\u00e9r Viderman", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Ladislav Guly\u00e1s": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Ladislav Guly\u00e1s", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Tibor Szeles": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Tibor Szeles", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Bianka B\u00e9resov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Bianka B\u00e9resov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / T\u00fcnde T\u00f3thov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / T\u00fcnde T\u00f3thov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Otto Kluka": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Otto Kluka", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Timea Zsilinsk\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Timea Zsilinsk\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Imrich Zsemlye": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Imrich Zsemlye", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Ladislav \u00c1d\u00e1m": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Ladislav \u00c1d\u00e1m", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Norbert Janetka": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Norbert Janetka", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Judita Boz\u00f3": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Judita Boz\u00f3", "MKDA-MKDSZ / M\u00e1ria Abah\u00e1ziov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / M\u00e1ria Abah\u00e1ziov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Attila B\u00e9da": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Attila B\u00e9da", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Gabriel P\u00e1l": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Gabriel P\u00e1l", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Henrieta V\u00e1mos": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Henrieta V\u00e1mos", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Evel\u00edna Kissov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Evel\u00edna Kissov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Mikul\u00e1\u0161 Sokol": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Mikul\u00e1\u0161 Sokol", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Adri\u00e1n B\u00e1\u0161ti": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Adri\u00e1n B\u00e1\u0161ti", "MKDA-MKDSZ / J\u00falius Kova\u010d": "MKDA-MKDSZ / J\u00falius Kova\u010d", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Ladislav W\u00e1gner": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Ladislav W\u00e1gner", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Iveta Horv\u00e1thov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Iveta Horv\u00e1thov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Tibor R\u00e1cz": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Tibor R\u00e1cz", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Michal Ki\u0161\u0161": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Michal Ki\u0161\u0161", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Gabriel Ag\u00f3cs": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Gabriel Ag\u00f3cs", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Iveta Baloghov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Iveta Baloghov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / M\u00e1ria Sillikov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / M\u00e1ria Sillikov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Melinda Menyh\u00e9rtov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Melinda Menyh\u00e9rtov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / J\u00e1n Sz\u0171cs": "MKDA-MKDSZ / J\u00e1n Sz\u0171cs", "MKDA-MKDSZ / J\u00e1nos S\u00e1rk\u00f6zi": "MKDA-MKDSZ / J\u00e1nos S\u00e1rk\u00f6zi", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Helena \u0160utkov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Helena \u0160utkov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / R\u00f3bert Bal\u00e1\u017e": "MKDA-MKDSZ / R\u00f3bert Bal\u00e1\u017e", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Norbert M\u00e9sz\u00e1ros": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Norbert M\u00e9sz\u00e1ros", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Patrik Juh\u00e1sz": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Patrik Juh\u00e1sz", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Zuzana \u00c1d\u00e1mov\u00e1.1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Zuzana \u00c1d\u00e1mov\u00e1.1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Eva Ne\u0161\u0165\u00e1kov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Eva Ne\u0161\u0165\u00e1kov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Andrea Menyh\u00e9rtov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Andrea Menyh\u00e9rtov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / R\u00f3bert \u00c1d\u00e1m": "MKDA-MKDSZ / R\u00f3bert \u00c1d\u00e1m", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Angela Dar\u00f3cziov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Angela Dar\u00f3cziov\u00e1", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Silvia Nistelbergerov\u00e1": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Silvia Nistelbergerov\u00e1", "VZDOR / Stanislav Piro\u0161\u00edk": "VZDOR / Stanislav Piro\u0161\u00edk", "VZDOR / Miroslav Pomajd\u00edk": "VZDOR / Miroslav Pomajd\u00edk", "VZDOR / Martin Zele\u0148\u00e1k": "VZDOR / Martin Zele\u0148\u00e1k", "VZDOR / Jozef Vacula": "VZDOR / Jozef Vacula", "VZDOR / Martin J\u00e1grik": "VZDOR / Martin J\u00e1grik", "VZDOR / Branislav Jurn\u00fd": "VZDOR / Branislav Jurn\u00fd", "VZDOR / Zlata Pomajd\u00edkov\u00e1": "VZDOR / Zlata Pomajd\u00edkov\u00e1", "VZDOR / Anton Orokock\u00fd": "VZDOR / Anton Orokock\u00fd", "VZDOR / Mari\u00e1n \u010cerven\u00fd": "VZDOR / Mari\u00e1n \u010cerven\u00fd", "VZDOR / \u0160tefan Kubini": "VZDOR / \u0160tefan Kubini", "VZDOR / Ivan \u010cavajda": "VZDOR / Ivan \u010cavajda", "VZDOR / Tom\u00e1\u0161 B\u00f3ka": "VZDOR / Tom\u00e1\u0161 B\u00f3ka", "VZDOR / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Piro\u0161\u00edk": "VZDOR / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Piro\u0161\u00edk", "VZDOR / Miroslav Biel": "VZDOR / Miroslav Biel", "VZDOR / Peter \u010cern\u00e1k": "VZDOR / Peter \u010cern\u00e1k", "VZDOR / Regina Lalikov\u00e1": "VZDOR / Regina Lalikov\u00e1", "VZDOR / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Klimek": "VZDOR / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Klimek", "VZDOR / Milan Ol\u0161ovsk\u00fd": "VZDOR / Milan Ol\u0161ovsk\u00fd", "VZDOR / Luk\u00e1\u0161 \u0160alap": "VZDOR / Luk\u00e1\u0161 \u0160alap", "VZDOR / Ren\u00e1ta Kacov\u00e1": "VZDOR / Ren\u00e1ta Kacov\u00e1", "VZDOR / \u0160tefan R\u00e1c": "VZDOR / \u0160tefan R\u00e1c", "VZDOR / Miroslav Biel.1": "VZDOR / Miroslav Biel.1", "VZDOR / Du\u0161an Sabol": "VZDOR / Du\u0161an Sabol", "VZDOR / Patrik \u017didek": "VZDOR / Patrik \u017didek", "VZDOR / Stanislav \u010cavajda": "VZDOR / Stanislav \u010cavajda", "VZDOR / Ter\u00e9zia Darva\u0161ov\u00e1": "VZDOR / Ter\u00e9zia Darva\u0161ov\u00e1", "VZDOR / Leonid Podstranick\u00fd": "VZDOR / Leonid Podstranick\u00fd", "VZDOR / Dominik Horeli\u010dan": "VZDOR / Dominik Horeli\u010dan", "VZDOR / Rudolf Varga": "VZDOR / Rudolf Varga", "VZDOR / Adam Nosek": "VZDOR / Adam Nosek", "VZDOR / Anton Mih\u00e1lik": "VZDOR / Anton Mih\u00e1lik", "VZDOR / Ladislav Michalek": "VZDOR / Ladislav Michalek", "VZDOR / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Lalik": "VZDOR / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Lalik", "VZDOR / Slavom\u00edr Gur\u00e1\u0148": "VZDOR / Slavom\u00edr Gur\u00e1\u0148", "VZDOR / Val\u00e9r Simko": "VZDOR / Val\u00e9r Simko", "VZDOR / Peter Kasarda": "VZDOR / Peter Kasarda", "VZDOR / Vladim\u00edr Z\u00e1kop\u010dan": "VZDOR / Vladim\u00edr Z\u00e1kop\u010dan", "VZDOR / Tom\u00e1\u0161 K\u0159ibsk\u00fd": "VZDOR / Tom\u00e1\u0161 K\u0159ibsk\u00fd", "VZDOR / Milan Ostatn\u00edk": "VZDOR / Milan Ostatn\u00edk", "VZDOR / Michal Sklen\u010d\u00e1r": "VZDOR / Michal Sklen\u010d\u00e1r", "VZDOR / Marek Basala": "VZDOR / Marek Basala", "VZDOR / Jozef Bajk\u00f3": "VZDOR / Jozef Bajk\u00f3", "VZDOR / Peter Kos\u0165": "VZDOR / Peter Kos\u0165", "VZDOR / Jaroslav Firka\u013e": "VZDOR / Jaroslav Firka\u013e", "VZDOR / Pavol Tka\u010d": "VZDOR / Pavol Tka\u010d", "VZDOR / \u0160tefan Fedi\u010d": "VZDOR / \u0160tefan Fedi\u010d", "VZDOR / Vladim\u00edr Chalupka": "VZDOR / Vladim\u00edr Chalupka", "MOST - H\u00cdD / B\u00e9la Bug\u00e1r": "MOST - H\u00cdD / B\u00e9la Bug\u00e1r", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Lucia \u017dit\u0148ansk\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Lucia \u017dit\u0148ansk\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / L\u00e1szl\u00f3 S\u00f3lymos": "MOST - H\u00cdD / L\u00e1szl\u00f3 S\u00f3lymos", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Zsolt Simon": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Zsolt Simon", "MOST - H\u00cdD / G\u00e1bor G\u00e1l": "MOST - H\u00cdD / G\u00e1bor G\u00e1l", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Tibor Bastrn\u00e1k": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Tibor Bastrn\u00e1k", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ivan \u0160vejna": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ivan \u0160vejna", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Elem\u00e9r Jakab": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Elem\u00e9r Jakab", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Arp\u00e1d \u00c9rsek": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Arp\u00e1d \u00c9rsek", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Franti\u0161ek \u0160ebej": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Franti\u0161ek \u0160ebej", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Edita Pfundtner": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Edita Pfundtner", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Gabriel Csicsai": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Gabriel Csicsai", "MOST - H\u00cdD / P\u00e9ter V\u00f6r\u00f6s": "MOST - H\u00cdD / P\u00e9ter V\u00f6r\u00f6s", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Kraj\u0148\u00e1k": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Kraj\u0148\u00e1k", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ir\u00e9n S\u00e1rk\u00f6zy": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ir\u00e9n S\u00e1rk\u00f6zy", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Antal": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Antal", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ladislav Bal\u00f3di": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ladislav Bal\u00f3di", "MOST - H\u00cdD / \u0160tefan Vavrek": "MOST - H\u00cdD / \u0160tefan Vavrek", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Zuzana Csadyov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Zuzana Csadyov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Kres\u00e1k": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Kres\u00e1k", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Karol Pataky": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Karol Pataky", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Andrea Vitk\u00f3ov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Andrea Vitk\u00f3ov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Galbav\u00fd": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Galbav\u00fd", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Pavol Burdiga": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Pavol Burdiga", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Bertalan B\u00f3na": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Bertalan B\u00f3na", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Morvay": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Morvay", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Mari\u00e1n T\u00f3th": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Mari\u00e1n T\u00f3th", "MOST - H\u00cdD / \u013duba Kr\u00e1\u013eov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / \u013duba Kr\u00e1\u013eov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Zolt\u00e1n Fekete": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Zolt\u00e1n Fekete", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Stanislav Vosp\u00e1lek": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Stanislav Vosp\u00e1lek", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Viktor Lesty\u00e1nszky": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Viktor Lesty\u00e1nszky", "MOST - H\u00cdD / R\u00f3bert T\u00f6lgyesi": "MOST - H\u00cdD / R\u00f3bert T\u00f6lgyesi", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Martin Dub\u00e9ci": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Martin Dub\u00e9ci", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Eva \u010c\u00e1kv\u00e1riov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Eva \u010c\u00e1kv\u00e1riov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Zolt\u00e1n Marczell": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Zolt\u00e1n Marczell", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Vladim\u00edr V\u00e1g\u00e1si": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Vladim\u00edr V\u00e1g\u00e1si", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Iveta Pl\u0161ekov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Iveta Pl\u0161ekov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Ag\u00f3cs": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Ag\u00f3cs", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Norbert Kru\u0161insk\u00fd": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Norbert Kru\u0161insk\u00fd", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Zolt\u00e1n Forr\u00f3": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Zolt\u00e1n Forr\u00f3", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Alexander Slafkovsk\u00fd": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Alexander Slafkovsk\u00fd", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Lajos Cs\u00f3ka": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Lajos Cs\u00f3ka", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Krist\u00edna Bug\u00e1rov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Krist\u00edna Bug\u00e1rov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Jakub Kuruc": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Jakub Kuruc", "MOST - H\u00cdD / R\u00f3bert Csudai": "MOST - H\u00cdD / R\u00f3bert Csudai", "MOST - H\u00cdD / \u00c1gnes H\u00e9der": "MOST - H\u00cdD / \u00c1gnes H\u00e9der", "MOST - H\u00cdD / T\u00edmea Feketeov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / T\u00edmea Feketeov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Gust\u00e1v Magyarics": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Gust\u00e1v Magyarics", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Zolt\u00e1n Antal": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Zolt\u00e1n Antal", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Rudolf H\u00e9ger": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Rudolf H\u00e9ger", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Pavol Krut\u00fd": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Pavol Krut\u00fd", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Jozef Ko\u0161a": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Jozef Ko\u0161a", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ren\u00e1ta Medgyesov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ren\u00e1ta Medgyesov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Zolt\u00e1n Kov\u00e1cs": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Zolt\u00e1n Kov\u00e1cs", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ervin Chom\u010da": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ervin Chom\u010da", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Agne\u0161a T\u00f3thov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Agne\u0161a T\u00f3thov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Franti\u0161ek Magyari": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Franti\u0161ek Magyari", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Rita P\u00e1sztorov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Rita P\u00e1sztorov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / \u0160tefan Kert\u00e9sz": "MOST - H\u00cdD / \u0160tefan Kert\u00e9sz", "MOST - H\u00cdD / \u0160tefan Szidor": "MOST - H\u00cdD / \u0160tefan Szidor", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Silvester Galo": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Silvester Galo", "MOST - H\u00cdD / M\u00e1ria Vargov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / M\u00e1ria Vargov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Viliam Rigo": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Viliam Rigo", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Franti\u0161ek Vangel": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Franti\u0161ek Vangel", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Jozef Boj\u010d\u00edk": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Jozef Boj\u010d\u00edk", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Karol Farkas": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Karol Farkas", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ladislav Lang": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ladislav Lang", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Michal Gori\u0161\u010d\u00e1k": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Michal Gori\u0161\u010d\u00e1k", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Rastislav \u017ditn\u00fd": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Rastislav \u017ditn\u00fd", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Eva Polereck\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Eva Polereck\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Zolt\u00e1n Borsiczk\u00fd": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Zolt\u00e1n Borsiczk\u00fd", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ladislav Kukol\u00edk": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ladislav Kukol\u00edk", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Jozef Jobb\u00e1gy": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Jozef Jobb\u00e1gy", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Boris Brunner": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Boris Brunner", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Kakulo\u0161": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Kakulo\u0161", "MOST - H\u00cdD / \u013dubica Kov\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / \u013dubica Kov\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ivana Festenburg": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ivana Festenburg", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Daniela Baranov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Daniela Baranov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / J\u00e1n Buocik": "MOST - H\u00cdD / J\u00e1n Buocik", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Michal Zurbola": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Michal Zurbola", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Jozef Ma\u010far": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Jozef Ma\u010far", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Lajos Berner": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Lajos Berner", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ondrej Hanzl\u00edk": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ondrej Hanzl\u00edk", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Gabriel L\u00e1szl\u00f3": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Gabriel L\u00e1szl\u00f3", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Branislav Horn\u00edk": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Branislav Horn\u00edk", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Erzs\u00e9bet Hamerlik": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Erzs\u00e9bet Hamerlik", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Franti\u0161ek M\u00e9sz\u00e1ros": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Franti\u0161ek M\u00e9sz\u00e1ros", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Vojtech Ravasz": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Vojtech Ravasz", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Atila Oravecz": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Atila Oravecz", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Attila Tuloki": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Attila Tuloki", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Szab\u00f3": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Szab\u00f3", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Jozef D\u00facz": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Jozef D\u00facz", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Karol Streda": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Karol Streda", "MOST - H\u00cdD / M\u00e1ria Vinczeov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / M\u00e1ria Vinczeov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Rudolf Gregorovi\u010d": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Rudolf Gregorovi\u010d", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Erik Bojni\u010dan": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Erik Bojni\u010dan", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Franti\u0161ek Mikl\u00f3s": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Franti\u0161ek Mikl\u00f3s", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Merav\u00fd": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Merav\u00fd", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Pavol Nagy": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Pavol Nagy", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Petra Nagyov\u00e1 D\u017eerengov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Petra Nagyov\u00e1 D\u017eerengov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ivan Va\u0148o": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ivan Va\u0148o", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Erika Be\u0148ov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Erika Be\u0148ov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Gabriela J\u00f3zan Horv\u00e1th": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Gabriela J\u00f3zan Horv\u00e1th", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Vladim\u00edr Sav\u010dinsk\u00fd": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Vladim\u00edr Sav\u010dinsk\u00fd", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Bollo": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Bollo", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Zolt\u00e1n Szab\u00f3": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Zolt\u00e1n Szab\u00f3", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Franti\u0161ek Bachorec": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Franti\u0161ek Bachorec", "MOST - H\u00cdD / \u0160tefan T\u00f3th": "MOST - H\u00cdD / \u0160tefan T\u00f3th", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Tat\u00e1r": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Tat\u00e1r", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Jakab": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Jakab", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Maro\u0161 Rep\u00edk": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Maro\u0161 Rep\u00edk", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Adri\u00e1n Kubica": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Adri\u00e1n Kubica", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Norbert Czibula": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Norbert Czibula", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Marek Da\u0148ko": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Marek Da\u0148ko", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Martin J\u00f3na": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Martin J\u00f3na", "MOST - H\u00cdD / J\u00e1n Hala\u0161ka": "MOST - H\u00cdD / J\u00e1n Hala\u0161ka", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Pavel Kropitz": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Pavel Kropitz", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Tibor Bal\u00e1zs": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Tibor Bal\u00e1zs", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Marek Korpa": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Marek Korpa", "MOST - H\u00cdD / M\u00e1ria Zuberov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / M\u00e1ria Zuberov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Anik\u00f3 Szklad\u00e1nyi Helys\u00e9g": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Anik\u00f3 Szklad\u00e1nyi Helys\u00e9g", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Dalibor \u010eura\u010dka": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Dalibor \u010eura\u010dka", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Kristi\u00e1n Kov\u00e1cs": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Kristi\u00e1n Kov\u00e1cs", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ur\u0161ula Ambru\u0161ov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ur\u0161ula Ambru\u0161ov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Hencz": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Hencz", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Jozef \u017delinsk\u00fd": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Jozef \u017delinsk\u00fd", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Sylvia Be\u0148ov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Sylvia Be\u0148ov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ladislav R\u00e1cz": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ladislav R\u00e1cz", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Gabriel K\u00f6b\u00f6l": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Gabriel K\u00f6b\u00f6l", "MOST - H\u00cdD / L\u00edvia Farkasov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / L\u00edvia Farkasov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / D\u00f3ra Horv\u00e1thov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / D\u00f3ra Horv\u00e1thov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Radoslav Kaln\u00fd": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Radoslav Kaln\u00fd", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Jitka Semivanov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Jitka Semivanov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Erika Ku\u0161ick\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Erika Ku\u0161ick\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Milan Ha\u0161an": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Milan Ha\u0161an", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Monika Khernov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Monika Khernov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Jaroslav P\u00e1stor": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Jaroslav P\u00e1stor", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Milada Flori\u00e1nov\u00e1": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Milada Flori\u00e1nov\u00e1", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter \u0160tefa\u0148\u00e1k": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter \u0160tefa\u0148\u00e1k", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Fajta": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Fajta", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Mint\u00e1l": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Peter Mint\u00e1l", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Tibor T\u00f3th": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Tibor T\u00f3th", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Magdal\u00e9na T\u00e1rnok": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Magdal\u00e9na T\u00e1rnok", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Csaba Cs\u00edzi": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Csaba Cs\u00edzi", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Gabriel D\u00f6me": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Gabriel D\u00f6me", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Gabriel Szalay": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Gabriel Szalay", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Igor \u0160ag\u00e1t": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Igor \u0160ag\u00e1t", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Dion\u00fdz Sipos": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Dion\u00fdz Sipos", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ladislav \u00c1gh": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Ladislav \u00c1gh", "SNS / Andrej Danko": "SNS / Andrej Danko", "SNS / Jaroslav Pa\u0161ka": "SNS / Jaroslav Pa\u0161ka", "SNS / Eva Smol\u00edkov\u00e1": "SNS / Eva Smol\u00edkov\u00e1", "SNS / Anton Hrnko": "SNS / Anton Hrnko", "SNS / \u0160tefan Zeln\u00edk": "SNS / \u0160tefan Zeln\u00edk", "SNS / Vladim\u00edr Chovan": "SNS / Vladim\u00edr Chovan", "SNS / Stanislav Kmec": "SNS / Stanislav Kmec", "SNS / Rudolf Urbanovi\u010d": "SNS / Rudolf Urbanovi\u010d", "SNS / Jaroslav Rido\u0161ko": "SNS / Jaroslav Rido\u0161ko", "SNS / Magdal\u00e9na Kucia\u0148ov\u00e1": "SNS / Magdal\u00e9na Kucia\u0148ov\u00e1", "SNS / Tibor Berna\u0165\u00e1k": "SNS / Tibor Berna\u0165\u00e1k", "SNS / Peter Pamula": "SNS / Peter Pamula", "SNS / Radovan Bal\u00e1\u017e": "SNS / Radovan Bal\u00e1\u017e", "SNS / Eva Anto\u0161ov\u00e1": "SNS / Eva Anto\u0161ov\u00e1", "SNS / Tibor Jan\u010dula": "SNS / Tibor Jan\u010dula", "SNS / Jaroslav Regec": "SNS / Jaroslav Regec", "SNS / Juraj Sobo\u0148a": "SNS / Juraj Sobo\u0148a", "SNS / Karol Kon\u00e1rik": "SNS / Karol Kon\u00e1rik", "SNS / Michal Lavr\u00edk": "SNS / Michal Lavr\u00edk", "SNS / Du\u0161an Tittel": "SNS / Du\u0161an Tittel", "SNS / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Machala": "SNS / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Machala", "SNS / Jozef Hud\u00e1k": "SNS / Jozef Hud\u00e1k", "SNS / Karol Farka\u0161ovsk\u00fd": "SNS / Karol Farka\u0161ovsk\u00fd", "SNS / Miroslav \u0160kvarek": "SNS / Miroslav \u0160kvarek", "SNS / J\u00falia Koll\u00e1rov\u00e1": "SNS / J\u00falia Koll\u00e1rov\u00e1", "SNS / Martin Pastirik": "SNS / Martin Pastirik", "SNS / Pavel Kapusta": "SNS / Pavel Kapusta", "SNS / Erik Gemzick\u00fd": "SNS / Erik Gemzick\u00fd", "SNS / J\u00e1n Ikr\u00e9nyi": "SNS / J\u00e1n Ikr\u00e9nyi", "SNS / Slavom\u00edr Kupka": "SNS / Slavom\u00edr Kupka", "SNS / Maro\u0161 Pavlovi\u010d": "SNS / Maro\u0161 Pavlovi\u010d", "SNS / \u013dudov\u00edt Hajduk": "SNS / \u013dudov\u00edt Hajduk", "SNS / Du\u0161an Lauko": "SNS / Du\u0161an Lauko", "SNS / Helena Pol\u00e1kov\u00e1": "SNS / Helena Pol\u00e1kov\u00e1", "SNS / Milan Mlyn\u00e1r": "SNS / Milan Mlyn\u00e1r", "SNS / J\u00e1n Kri\u0161anda": "SNS / J\u00e1n Kri\u0161anda", "SNS / Jarmila Tk\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1": "SNS / Jarmila Tk\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1", "SNS / Tibor Hanuliak": "SNS / Tibor Hanuliak", "SNS / J\u00falius Buchta": "SNS / J\u00falius Buchta", "SNS / Eduard Markovi\u010d": "SNS / Eduard Markovi\u010d", "SNS / Emil Div\u00e9ky": "SNS / Emil Div\u00e9ky", "SNS / Zdenko Koz\u00e1k": "SNS / Zdenko Koz\u00e1k", "SNS / Ladislav Pecko": "SNS / Ladislav Pecko", "SNS / Martin Miku\u0161": "SNS / Martin Miku\u0161", "SNS / Pavol Gori\u0161\u010d\u00e1k": "SNS / Pavol Gori\u0161\u010d\u00e1k", "SNS / Igor \u0160ufliarsky": "SNS / Igor \u0160ufliarsky", "SNS / Milan \u010eurica": "SNS / Milan \u010eurica", "SNS / Peter Urbanec": "SNS / Peter Urbanec", "SNS / Jana Breckov\u00e1": "SNS / Jana Breckov\u00e1", "SNS / Ivan \u0160a\u0161ko": "SNS / Ivan \u0160a\u0161ko", "SNS / Peter Br\u00e1zda": "SNS / Peter Br\u00e1zda", "SNS / Jaroslav Barcaj": "SNS / Jaroslav Barcaj", "SNS / Du\u0161an Raj\u010dan": "SNS / Du\u0161an Raj\u010dan", "SNS / Sl\u00e1vka Kram\u00e1rov\u00e1": "SNS / Sl\u00e1vka Kram\u00e1rov\u00e1", "SNS / Mari\u00e1n Vojtko": "SNS / Mari\u00e1n Vojtko", "SNS / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Kuchar\u00edk": "SNS / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Kuchar\u00edk", "SNS / J\u00e1n Sitek": "SNS / J\u00e1n Sitek", "SNS / Eva Milu\u010dk\u00e1": "SNS / Eva Milu\u010dk\u00e1", "SNS / Milan Sta\u0148o": "SNS / Milan Sta\u0148o", "SNS / Miroslav Brincko": "SNS / Miroslav Brincko", "SNS / M\u00e1rio Dinga": "SNS / M\u00e1rio Dinga", "SNS / Jaroslav Fidrik": "SNS / Jaroslav Fidrik", "SNS / Milan Kr\u00e1lik": "SNS / Milan Kr\u00e1lik", "SNS / Pavel Ol\u0161iak": "SNS / Pavel Ol\u0161iak", "SNS / Jaroslav Va\u013eo": "SNS / Jaroslav Va\u013eo", "SNS / Miriama Linkov\u00e1": "SNS / Miriama Linkov\u00e1", "SNS / Jozef Galbav\u00fd": "SNS / Jozef Galbav\u00fd", "SNS / Juraj Kli\u017ean": "SNS / Juraj Kli\u017ean", "SNS / Du\u0161an Backo": "SNS / Du\u0161an Backo", "SNS / Du\u0161an Ha\u013eko": "SNS / Du\u0161an Ha\u013eko", "SNS / Milan Garaj": "SNS / Milan Garaj", "SNS / Stanislav Haramia": "SNS / Stanislav Haramia", "SNS / Vladim\u00edr Fra\u0148o": "SNS / Vladim\u00edr Fra\u0148o", "SNS / Pavol Kleban": "SNS / Pavol Kleban", "SNS / Ondrej \u0160ediv\u00fd": "SNS / Ondrej \u0160ediv\u00fd", "SNS / Valter Retter": "SNS / Valter Retter", "SNS / D\u00e1vid Deme\u010dko": "SNS / D\u00e1vid Deme\u010dko", "SNS / Miroslav Sluka": "SNS / Miroslav Sluka", "SNS / J\u00e1n Tulis": "SNS / J\u00e1n Tulis", "SNS / Milan Klempai": "SNS / Milan Klempai", "SNS / Emil \u0160atan": "SNS / Emil \u0160atan", "SNS / Ingrid Vrko\u010dov\u00e1": "SNS / Ingrid Vrko\u010dov\u00e1", "SNS / Ivan I\u0161tv\u00e1nffy": "SNS / Ivan I\u0161tv\u00e1nffy", "SNS / Monika Gerge\u013eov\u00e1": "SNS / Monika Gerge\u013eov\u00e1", "SNS / Jozef Pribock\u00fd": "SNS / Jozef Pribock\u00fd", "SNS / Karol Gerh\u00e1t": "SNS / Karol Gerh\u00e1t", "SNS / Peter Zorvan": "SNS / Peter Zorvan", "SNS / Mari\u00e1n Kr\u00e1sny": "SNS / Mari\u00e1n Kr\u00e1sny", "SNS / \u0160tefan Reh\u00e1k": "SNS / \u0160tefan Reh\u00e1k", "SNS / Mari\u00e1n Andel": "SNS / Mari\u00e1n Andel", "SNS / Ivan Bubela": "SNS / Ivan Bubela", "SNS / \u0160tefan Paulov": "SNS / \u0160tefan Paulov", "SNS / Mariana Boha\u010diakov\u00e1": "SNS / Mariana Boha\u010diakov\u00e1", "SNS / Du\u0161an Macoszek": "SNS / Du\u0161an Macoszek", "SNS / \u013dubom\u00edr Ontkovi\u010d": "SNS / \u013dubom\u00edr Ontkovi\u010d", "SNS / Janka Pisarikov\u00e1": "SNS / Janka Pisarikov\u00e1", "SNS / Igor Pav\u00fak": "SNS / Igor Pav\u00fak", "SNS / Klaudia Bertokov\u00e1": "SNS / Klaudia Bertokov\u00e1", "SNS / Zuzana \u0160kopcov\u00e1": "SNS / Zuzana \u0160kopcov\u00e1", "SNS / J\u00e1n Olejn\u00edk": "SNS / J\u00e1n Olejn\u00edk", "SNS / Patrik Zvon\u00e1r": "SNS / Patrik Zvon\u00e1r", "SNS / Juraj \u0160r\u00e1mek": "SNS / Juraj \u0160r\u00e1mek", "SNS / Martin Patoprst\u00fd": "SNS / Martin Patoprst\u00fd", "SNS / Igor \u0160\u00e1ly": "SNS / Igor \u0160\u00e1ly", "SNS / Milan \u010ceremeta": "SNS / Milan \u010ceremeta", "SNS / Miroslav Magdech": "SNS / Miroslav Magdech", "SNS / Miroslav Ilavsk\u00fd": "SNS / Miroslav Ilavsk\u00fd", "SNS / O\u013ega B\u00faryov\u00e1": "SNS / O\u013ega B\u00faryov\u00e1", "SNS / M\u00e1ria Farka\u0161ov\u00e1": "SNS / M\u00e1ria Farka\u0161ov\u00e1", "SNS / Vincent T\u00f3th": "SNS / Vincent T\u00f3th", "SNS / Iveta Ko\u017euchov\u00e1": "SNS / Iveta Ko\u017euchov\u00e1", "SNS / Vladim\u00edr Fekia\u010d": "SNS / Vladim\u00edr Fekia\u010d", "SNS / \u013dudov\u00edt Ru\u017ei\u010dka": "SNS / \u013dudov\u00edt Ru\u017ei\u010dka", "SNS / Zdena Hy\u017e\u00e1kov\u00e1": "SNS / Zdena Hy\u017e\u00e1kov\u00e1", "SNS / Ladislav Hospod\u00e1r": "SNS / Ladislav Hospod\u00e1r", "SNS / Jozef Horv\u00e1th": "SNS / Jozef Horv\u00e1th", "SNS / Ladislav \u010cern\u00e1k": "SNS / Ladislav \u010cern\u00e1k", "SNS / \u013dubom\u00edr Bielko": "SNS / \u013dubom\u00edr Bielko", "SNS / Du\u0161an Ma\u0161lonka": "SNS / Du\u0161an Ma\u0161lonka", "SNS / Milan \u010eur\u00e1k": "SNS / Milan \u010eur\u00e1k", "SNS / J\u00e1n Z\u00e1hon\u010d\u00edk": "SNS / J\u00e1n Z\u00e1hon\u010d\u00edk", "SNS / Franti\u0161ek Orsz\u00e1gh": "SNS / Franti\u0161ek Orsz\u00e1gh", "SNS / Peter Kuchari\u010d": "SNS / Peter Kuchari\u010d", "SNS / Pavel Gavalec": "SNS / Pavel Gavalec", "SNS / \u013dubo\u0161 Bern\u00e1t": "SNS / \u013dubo\u0161 Bern\u00e1t", "SNS / Eduard Pokorn\u00fd": "SNS / Eduard Pokorn\u00fd", "SNS / M\u00e1ria Luprichov\u00e1": "SNS / M\u00e1ria Luprichov\u00e1", "SNS / Martin \u010can\u00e1dy": "SNS / Martin \u010can\u00e1dy", "SNS / Peter Bo\u017e\u00edk": "SNS / Peter Bo\u017e\u00edk", "SNS / J\u00e1n Jakubiansk\u00fd": "SNS / J\u00e1n Jakubiansk\u00fd", "SNS / Eva Petr\u00e1\u0161kov\u00e1": "SNS / Eva Petr\u00e1\u0161kov\u00e1", "SNS / Peter Tap\u0161\u00e1k": "SNS / Peter Tap\u0161\u00e1k", "SNS / Eduard Hartmann": "SNS / Eduard Hartmann", "SNS / M\u00e1rio Popovi\u010d": "SNS / M\u00e1rio Popovi\u010d", "SNS / R\u00f3bert Jamro\u0161kovi\u010d": "SNS / R\u00f3bert Jamro\u0161kovi\u010d", "SNS / Peter Hasa": "SNS / Peter Hasa", "SNS / Rastislav Ko\u010dka": "SNS / Rastislav Ko\u010dka", "SNS / Peter Pito\u0148\u00e1k": "SNS / Peter Pito\u0148\u00e1k", "SNS / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Cinkani\u010d": "SNS / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Cinkani\u010d", "SNS / J\u00e1n Plencner": "SNS / J\u00e1n Plencner", "SNS / Marek Or\u0161ula": "SNS / Marek Or\u0161ula", "SNS / Miroslav Sedl\u00e1\u010dek": "SNS / Miroslav Sedl\u00e1\u010dek", "SNS / Emil Dud\u00e1\u0161": "SNS / Emil Dud\u00e1\u0161", "SNS / Andrej Palu\u0161ka": "SNS / Andrej Palu\u0161ka", "SNS / Jozef Brto\u0161": "SNS / Jozef Brto\u0161", "SNS / Vlastimil E\u0161tvan": "SNS / Vlastimil E\u0161tvan", "SNS / Jaroslav Kocan": "SNS / Jaroslav Kocan", "SNS / Stanislav Ga\u013ea": "SNS / Stanislav Ga\u013ea", "SNS / Peter Hrb\u00e1\u0148": "SNS / Peter Hrb\u00e1\u0148", "SNS / Jaroslav Blina": "SNS / Jaroslav Blina", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00e1n Pavli\u0161": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00e1n Pavli\u0161", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Krist\u00edna Ulmanov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Krist\u00edna Ulmanov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Ivan Go\u0148ko": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Ivan Go\u0148ko", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Svetlana Bornayov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Svetlana Bornayov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Stanislav Martin\u010dko": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Stanislav Martin\u010dko", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Andrea \u0160o\u0161kov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Andrea \u0160o\u0161kov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / \u013dubor Perh\u00e1\u010d": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / \u013dubor Perh\u00e1\u010d", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / \u013dubov Bochy\u0148ov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / \u013dubov Bochy\u0148ov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Martin Bavol\u00e1r": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Martin Bavol\u00e1r", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00e1n Rychvalsk\u00fd": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00e1n Rychvalsk\u00fd", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Rudolf Weiss": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Rudolf Weiss", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Ren\u00e1t Mandel\u00edk": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Ren\u00e1t Mandel\u00edk", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Em\u00edlia Bl\u00e1\u017eov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Em\u00edlia Bl\u00e1\u017eov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jozef Za\u0165ko": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jozef Za\u0165ko", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Martin Bago": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Martin Bago", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Daniel Di\u0161kanec": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Daniel Di\u0161kanec", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Mari\u00e1n \u017digala": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Mari\u00e1n \u017digala", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Ondrej Ko\u017eiak": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Ondrej Ko\u017eiak", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Filip Galambo\u0161": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Filip Galambo\u0161", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Bore Janeski": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Bore Janeski", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Oto Brandebur": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Oto Brandebur", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Gabriela Halu\u0161kov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Gabriela Halu\u0161kov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / \u013dubica Bla\u0161kov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / \u013dubica Bla\u0161kov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00e1n Antal": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00e1n Antal", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / \u0160tefan Grib": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / \u0160tefan Grib", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jozef Zima": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jozef Zima", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Em\u00edlia Kamenick\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Em\u00edlia Kamenick\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jozef\u00edna Tom\u00e1\u0161ov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jozef\u00edna Tom\u00e1\u0161ov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jaroslav Ha\u0161\u010di\u010d": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jaroslav Ha\u0161\u010di\u010d", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00e1n Bystriansky": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00e1n Bystriansky", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Vlasta Laga\u0148ov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Vlasta Laga\u0148ov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / \u0160tefan Pjontek": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / \u0160tefan Pjontek", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Milan Be\u0148o": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Milan Be\u0148o", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Vladim\u00edr \u010culko": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Vladim\u00edr \u010culko", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Andrea Valachov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Andrea Valachov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Magdal\u00e9na Ujvari - Liptakov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Magdal\u00e9na Ujvari - Liptakov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / R\u00f3bert Kil\u00edk": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / R\u00f3bert Kil\u00edk", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Miloslav Hoschek": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Miloslav Hoschek", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Milan Ded\u00edk": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Milan Ded\u00edk", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Val\u00e9ria Gren\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Val\u00e9ria Gren\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00e1n \u0160najder": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00e1n \u0160najder", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Franti\u0161ek Tomko": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Franti\u0161ek Tomko", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Gabriela Chudinov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Gabriela Chudinov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Peter D\u017eubera": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Peter D\u017eubera", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Michal Kyse\u013e": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Michal Kyse\u013e", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jarmila Forg\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jarmila Forg\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Eva Mat\u00e9ov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Eva Mat\u00e9ov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Juraj Pustai": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Juraj Pustai", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Zuzana Hluch\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Zuzana Hluch\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Erik M\u00facska": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Erik M\u00facska", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jozef Krpelan": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jozef Krpelan", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jana Varmu\u017eov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jana Varmu\u017eov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Marko Halu\u0161ka": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Marko Halu\u0161ka", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Drahoslav Miha\u013eov": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Drahoslav Miha\u013eov", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Rudolf Majerik": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Rudolf Majerik", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jozef Vojtu\u0148": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jozef Vojtu\u0148", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00e1n Margala": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00e1n Margala", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Lucia Kraj\u0148\u00e1kov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Lucia Kraj\u0148\u00e1kov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Babin": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Babin", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Zdenka Bendallov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Zdenka Bendallov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Silvia \u017ditn\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Silvia \u017ditn\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Renata Hornov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Renata Hornov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Vincent T\u00f3th": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Vincent T\u00f3th", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Anna Fecaninov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Anna Fecaninov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Ter\u00e9zia Doln\u00e1kov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Ter\u00e9zia Doln\u00e1kov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / O\u013ega Pali\u010dkov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / O\u013ega Pali\u010dkov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Franti\u0161ek Baldys": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Franti\u0161ek Baldys", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Darina Kapustov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Darina Kapustov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Miroslav Babin": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Miroslav Babin", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Luk\u00e1\u0161 \u017d\u00e1\u010dik": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Luk\u00e1\u0161 \u017d\u00e1\u010dik", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Ladislav Pira": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Ladislav Pira", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00falius M\u00e1t\u00e9": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00falius M\u00e1t\u00e9", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Marianna Stebkov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Marianna Stebkov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Miroslav Majn\u00fd": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Miroslav Majn\u00fd", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Mari\u00e1n Ba\u010da": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Mari\u00e1n Ba\u010da", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00e1n Sekere\u0161": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00e1n Sekere\u0161", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Michal Rakar": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Michal Rakar", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Ivan \u0160kovran": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Ivan \u0160kovran", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00e1n Fecanin": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00e1n Fecanin", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Nat\u00e1lia \u0158\u00edhov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Nat\u00e1lia \u0158\u00edhov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Peter Kov\u00e1\u010d": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Peter Kov\u00e1\u010d", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jana Gazd\u00edkov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jana Gazd\u00edkov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Tibor Kur\u010d\u00edk": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Tibor Kur\u010d\u00edk", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Milo\u0161 Kapr\u00e1\u013e": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Milo\u0161 Kapr\u00e1\u013e", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Nikola Forg\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Nikola Forg\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Franti\u0161ek Seliga": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Franti\u0161ek Seliga", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Vladislav Nov\u00e1k": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Vladislav Nov\u00e1k", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00e1n Darmo": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00e1n Darmo", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Mariana Hricov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Mariana Hricov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Vladim\u00edr Bizo\u0148": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Vladim\u00edr Bizo\u0148", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Dalibor Kohar": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Dalibor Kohar", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Imrich Grof": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Imrich Grof", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00e1n Ba\u010do": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00e1n Ba\u010do", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Richard \u017dof\u010d\u00e1k": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Richard \u017dof\u010d\u00e1k", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Patrik Textoris": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Patrik Textoris", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Gabriel Hronec": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Gabriel Hronec", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Jurica": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Jurica", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / M\u00e1rio J\u00e1no\u0161\u00edk": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / M\u00e1rio J\u00e1no\u0161\u00edk", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jana Nova Bobokov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jana Nova Bobokov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Otto Vollmann": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Otto Vollmann", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Martin D\u00e1vid": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Martin D\u00e1vid", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Miroslav Vojtek": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Miroslav Vojtek", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Franti\u0161ek \u00c1rvay": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Franti\u0161ek \u00c1rvay", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jana Mal\u00edkov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jana Mal\u00edkov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Iveta Ki\u0161\u0161imonov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Iveta Ki\u0161\u0161imonov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Alan Lano": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Alan Lano", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Filip Jakubec": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Filip Jakubec", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Henrieta \u010eatkov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Henrieta \u010eatkov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Peter Buda": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Peter Buda", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00e1n Kapusta": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / J\u00e1n Kapusta", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / O\u013ega Mur\u00e1nska": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / O\u013ega Mur\u00e1nska", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Miroslav Ko\u0161ari\u0161\u0165an": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Miroslav Ko\u0161ari\u0161\u0165an", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Marian Tu\u0161iak": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Marian Tu\u0161iak", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Zuzana Hamplov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Zuzana Hamplov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jana S\u00fdkorov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jana S\u00fdkorov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Franti\u0161ek Varmu\u017ea": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Franti\u0161ek Varmu\u017ea", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Marta Hajd\u00fachov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Marta Hajd\u00fachov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Ivana Dobrotov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Ivana Dobrotov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Bo\u017eena Trembo\u0161ov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Bo\u017eena Trembo\u0161ov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / L\u00edvia \u010c\u00ed\u017eov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / L\u00edvia \u010c\u00ed\u017eov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Svetlana \u010cabalov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Svetlana \u010cabalov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Kate\u0159ina Bydov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Kate\u0159ina Bydov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Veronika Bavl\u0161\u00edkov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Veronika Bavl\u0161\u00edkov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Martina Bur\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Martina Bur\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Andrea \u010cierna": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Andrea \u010cierna", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Milo\u0161 Potan\u010dok": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Milo\u0161 Potan\u010dok", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Franti\u0161ek Varmu\u017ea.1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Franti\u0161ek Varmu\u017ea.1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jozef J\u00e1nsky": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jozef J\u00e1nsky", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / \u013dubo\u0161 Kudela": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / \u013dubo\u0161 Kudela", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Darina Kapustov\u00e1.1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Darina Kapustov\u00e1.1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Juraj Mes\u00e1ro\u0161": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Juraj Mes\u00e1ro\u0161", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / \u013dubica Patr\u00e1\u0161ov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / \u013dubica Patr\u00e1\u0161ov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Monika Orthov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Monika Orthov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / \u013dudmila Dikov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / \u013dudmila Dikov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jaroslav Vol\u00e1r": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Jaroslav Vol\u00e1r", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Elena Ku\u0161n\u00edrov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Elena Ku\u0161n\u00edrov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Roman Bur\u010d\u00edk": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Roman Bur\u010d\u00edk", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / M\u00e1ria Bal\u00e1\u017eov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / M\u00e1ria Bal\u00e1\u017eov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Ivetta Laubertov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Ivetta Laubertov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Michal Glajch": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Michal Glajch", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Pavel \u0160ov\u010d\u00edk": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Pavel \u0160ov\u010d\u00edk", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Miroslava Gallkov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Miroslava Gallkov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Franti\u0161ek Baldys.1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Franti\u0161ek Baldys.1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Libu\u0161a Tatransk\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Libu\u0161a Tatransk\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Eva \u0160krab\u00e1kov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Eva \u0160krab\u00e1kov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Filip Pittner": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Filip Pittner", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Miroslav Kone\u010dn\u00fd": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Miroslav Kone\u010dn\u00fd", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / D\u00e1\u0161a Sziglov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / D\u00e1\u0161a Sziglov\u00e1", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Pavol Ku\u0161t\u00e1r": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Pavol Ku\u0161t\u00e1r", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / \u013dubica Br\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / \u013dubica Br\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1", "KSS / Jozef Hrdli\u010dka": "KSS / Jozef Hrdli\u010dka", "KSS / Jalal Suleiman": "KSS / Jalal Suleiman", "KSS / Jozef \u0160evc": "KSS / Jozef \u0160evc", "KSS / Artur Bekmatov": "KSS / Artur Bekmatov", "KSS / Jaroslav Ko\u010di\u0161": "KSS / Jaroslav Ko\u010di\u0161", "KSS / J\u00e1n Juri\u0161ta": "KSS / J\u00e1n Juri\u0161ta", "KSS / Anna Sotakov\u00e1": "KSS / Anna Sotakov\u00e1", "KSS / J\u00e1n Ka\u0161ica": "KSS / J\u00e1n Ka\u0161ica", "KSS / Juraj Obert": "KSS / Juraj Obert", "KSS / Peter Palko": "KSS / Peter Palko", "KSS / Viera Hurti\u0161ov\u00e1": "KSS / Viera Hurti\u0161ov\u00e1", "KSS / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Sis\u00e1k": "KSS / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Sis\u00e1k", "KSS / Miriam Moko\u0161ov\u00e1": "KSS / Miriam Moko\u0161ov\u00e1", "KSS / Ivan Kost\u00far": "KSS / Ivan Kost\u00far", "KSS / J\u00e1n Jakub\u010d\u00e1k": "KSS / J\u00e1n Jakub\u010d\u00e1k", "KSS / Juraj Ba\u0161ista": "KSS / Juraj Ba\u0161ista", "KSS / Karol Ondria\u0161": "KSS / Karol Ondria\u0161", "KSS / Michal Vojn\u00edk": "KSS / Michal Vojn\u00edk", "KSS / Martin Fabu\u0161": "KSS / Martin Fabu\u0161", "KSS / Erika Danihelov\u00e1": "KSS / Erika Danihelov\u00e1", "KSS / Pavol Su\u0161ko": "KSS / Pavol Su\u0161ko", "KSS / Vladim\u00edr Sl\u00e1dek": "KSS / Vladim\u00edr Sl\u00e1dek", "KSS / Lucia Ka\u0161iarov\u00e1": "KSS / Lucia Ka\u0161iarov\u00e1", "KSS / Michal Kotian": "KSS / Michal Kotian", "KSS / V\u00e1clav Homi\u0161an": "KSS / V\u00e1clav Homi\u0161an", "KSS / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Rov\u0148\u00e1k": "KSS / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Rov\u0148\u00e1k", "KSS / Michal Diene\u0161": "KSS / Michal Diene\u0161", "KSS / Jozef Bo\u0161ansk\u00fd": "KSS / Jozef Bo\u0161ansk\u00fd", "KSS / Mikul\u00e1\u0161 Lakato\u0161": "KSS / Mikul\u00e1\u0161 Lakato\u0161", "KSS / Juraj Pavlovi\u010d": "KSS / Juraj Pavlovi\u010d", "KSS / Rastislav Kopeck\u00fd": "KSS / Rastislav Kopeck\u00fd", "KSS / Iveta Ondrejovi\u010dov\u00e1": "KSS / Iveta Ondrejovi\u010dov\u00e1", "KSS / Katar\u00edna Volentierov\u00e1": "KSS / Katar\u00edna Volentierov\u00e1", "KSS / Samuel Zubo": "KSS / Samuel Zubo", "KSS / Marek Kopeck\u00fd": "KSS / Marek Kopeck\u00fd", "KSS / Du\u0161an Janek": "KSS / Du\u0161an Janek", "KSS / J\u00e1n Chalabala": "KSS / J\u00e1n Chalabala", "KSS / Milan Cap\u00e1k": "KSS / Milan Cap\u00e1k", "KSS / J\u00e1n Bla\u0161ko": "KSS / J\u00e1n Bla\u0161ko", "KSS / M\u00e1ria Geca\u0161kov\u00e1": "KSS / M\u00e1ria Geca\u0161kov\u00e1", "KSS / Mikul\u00e1\u0161 Ju\u0161\u010d\u00edk": "KSS / Mikul\u00e1\u0161 Ju\u0161\u010d\u00edk", "KSS / Zuzana K\u00fadelkov\u00e1": "KSS / Zuzana K\u00fadelkov\u00e1", "KSS / Jozef Kaj\u00e1nek": "KSS / Jozef Kaj\u00e1nek", "KSS / Miroslav \u010cauder": "KSS / Miroslav \u010cauder", "KSS / Eduard \u017digo": "KSS / Eduard \u017digo", "KSS / Slavom\u00edr Bla\u017eek": "KSS / Slavom\u00edr Bla\u017eek", "KSS / J\u00e1n Hamar": "KSS / J\u00e1n Hamar", "KSS / Dagmara Debn\u00e1rov\u00e1": "KSS / Dagmara Debn\u00e1rov\u00e1", "KSS / Karol Jank\u00f3": "KSS / Karol Jank\u00f3", "KSS / Rastislav Bobor": "KSS / Rastislav Bobor", "KSS / Mari\u00e1n Orie\u0161\u010dik": "KSS / Mari\u00e1n Orie\u0161\u010dik", "KSS / Tamara Kav\u010dakov\u00e1": "KSS / Tamara Kav\u010dakov\u00e1", "KSS / Alojz Alm\u00e1ssy": "KSS / Alojz Alm\u00e1ssy", "KSS / Val\u00e9ria Tholtov\u00e1": "KSS / Val\u00e9ria Tholtov\u00e1", "KSS / Mari\u00e1n Krakovsk\u00fd": "KSS / Mari\u00e1n Krakovsk\u00fd", "KSS / Ladislav Vojtko": "KSS / Ladislav Vojtko", "KSS / Ladislav Z\u00e1hradn\u00edk": "KSS / Ladislav Z\u00e1hradn\u00edk", "KSS / Jozef Smatana": "KSS / Jozef Smatana", "KSS / Dominik K\u00fatnik": "KSS / Dominik K\u00fatnik", "KSS / Du\u0161an Krivsk\u00fd": "KSS / Du\u0161an Krivsk\u00fd", "KSS / Daniel Kianica": "KSS / Daniel Kianica", "KSS / Kvetoslava Zelinov\u00e1": "KSS / Kvetoslava Zelinov\u00e1", "KSS / Juraj Brecko": "KSS / Juraj Brecko", "KSS / Roman Hudec": "KSS / Roman Hudec", "KSS / Andrea Stefanovi\u010d": "KSS / Andrea Stefanovi\u010d", "KSS / Jozef Kendra": "KSS / Jozef Kendra", "KSS / Miroslav Cimra": "KSS / Miroslav Cimra", "KSS / Juraj Bern\u00e1r": "KSS / Juraj Bern\u00e1r", "KSS / Jaroslav Studen\u00fd": "KSS / Jaroslav Studen\u00fd", "KSS / Alena Hant\u00e1kov\u00e1": "KSS / Alena Hant\u00e1kov\u00e1", "KSS / Val\u00e9ria Petrovsk\u00e1": "KSS / Val\u00e9ria Petrovsk\u00e1", "KSS / Vladim\u00edr Chlebo": "KSS / Vladim\u00edr Chlebo", "KSS / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Cebu\u013ea": "KSS / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Cebu\u013ea", "KSS / \u013dudov\u00edt Kr\u00e1\u013e": "KSS / \u013dudov\u00edt Kr\u00e1\u013e", "KSS / Pavol Le\u0161tinsk\u00fd": "KSS / Pavol Le\u0161tinsk\u00fd", "KSS / J\u00e1n Kraj\u010d\u00edk": "KSS / J\u00e1n Kraj\u010d\u00edk", "KSS / J\u00e1n Ko\u010dan": "KSS / J\u00e1n Ko\u010dan", "KSS / Alexander Horv\u00e1th": "KSS / Alexander Horv\u00e1th", "KSS / Jaroslav Pecho\u010diak": "KSS / Jaroslav Pecho\u010diak", "KSS / Eva Cebov\u00e1": "KSS / Eva Cebov\u00e1", "KSS / Valent\u00edna Humen\u00edkov\u00e1": "KSS / Valent\u00edna Humen\u00edkov\u00e1", "KSS / Alojz Bogric": "KSS / Alojz Bogric", "KSS / Miroslav \u010cuj": "KSS / Miroslav \u010cuj", "KSS / Franti\u0161ek Luka\u010dko": "KSS / Franti\u0161ek Luka\u010dko", "KSS / J\u00e1n Galu\u0161\u010dak": "KSS / J\u00e1n Galu\u0161\u010dak", "KSS / Robert Podrack\u00fd": "KSS / Robert Podrack\u00fd", "KSS / Milan Zbur\u00edn": "KSS / Milan Zbur\u00edn", "KSS / J\u00e1n Je\u017eo": "KSS / J\u00e1n Je\u017eo", "KSS / Stanislav Bal\u00e1\u017e": "KSS / Stanislav Bal\u00e1\u017e", "KSS / Eva Nemsilov\u00e1": "KSS / Eva Nemsilov\u00e1", "KSS / Dana Grusov\u00e1": "KSS / Dana Grusov\u00e1", "KSS / J\u00e1n Ka\u0161iar": "KSS / J\u00e1n Ka\u0161iar", "KSS / Zita Pr\u00edvozn\u00edkov\u00e1": "KSS / Zita Pr\u00edvozn\u00edkov\u00e1", "KSS / Ren\u00e9 Besterci": "KSS / Ren\u00e9 Besterci", "KSS / Eduard \u017digo.1": "KSS / Eduard \u017digo.1", "KSS / Dalibor Vuji\u010di\u010d": "KSS / Dalibor Vuji\u010di\u010d", "KSS / Miroslav Loch": "KSS / Miroslav Loch", "KSS / Vladislav \u0160vigar": "KSS / Vladislav \u0160vigar", "KSS / Igor Sojka": "KSS / Igor Sojka", "KSS / Lenka Szeg\u00e9nyov\u00e1": "KSS / Lenka Szeg\u00e9nyov\u00e1", "KSS / Jaroslav Sajko": "KSS / Jaroslav Sajko", "KSS / Alena Dubinov\u00e1": "KSS / Alena Dubinov\u00e1", "KSS / Peter Teyerl": "KSS / Peter Teyerl", "KSS / Milan B\u00e9re\u0161": "KSS / Milan B\u00e9re\u0161", "KSS / Vincent Anto\u0161": "KSS / Vincent Anto\u0161", "KSS / Viliam K\u00fatny": "KSS / Viliam K\u00fatny", "KSS / Franti\u0161ek \u0160u\u0161l\u00edk": "KSS / Franti\u0161ek \u0160u\u0161l\u00edk", "KSS / J\u00e1n U\u0161iak": "KSS / J\u00e1n U\u0161iak", "KSS / J\u00e1n Holub": "KSS / J\u00e1n Holub", "KSS / Zlatica Bach\u0148\u00e1kov\u00e1": "KSS / Zlatica Bach\u0148\u00e1kov\u00e1", "KSS / \u013dubom\u00edra Masarykov\u00e1": "KSS / \u013dubom\u00edra Masarykov\u00e1", "KSS / Marek Kanc\u00edr": "KSS / Marek Kanc\u00edr", "KSS / Miroslav Kulik": "KSS / Miroslav Kulik", "KSS / J\u00e1n Miklo\u0161": "KSS / J\u00e1n Miklo\u0161", "KSS / Tibor Kore\u010dko": "KSS / Tibor Kore\u010dko", "KSS / Danica Dole\u017ealov\u00e1": "KSS / Danica Dole\u017ealov\u00e1", "KSS / Peter Tvrd\u00fd": "KSS / Peter Tvrd\u00fd", "KSS / Katar\u00edna Kasardov\u00e1": "KSS / Katar\u00edna Kasardov\u00e1", "KSS / Milan Mal\u00fd": "KSS / Milan Mal\u00fd", "KSS / Michal Hane\u010d\u00e1k": "KSS / Michal Hane\u010d\u00e1k", "KSS / Pavol P\u0161en\u00e1k": "KSS / Pavol P\u0161en\u00e1k", "KSS / Vladim\u00edr Lulj\u00e1k": "KSS / Vladim\u00edr Lulj\u00e1k", "KSS / Anna Hor\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1": "KSS / Anna Hor\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1", "KSS / \u013dubom\u00edr Kol\u00e1r": "KSS / \u013dubom\u00edr Kol\u00e1r", "KSS / Elena Mik\u0161ov\u00e1": "KSS / Elena Mik\u0161ov\u00e1", "KSS / Bla\u017eena \u017d\u00e1kovicov\u00e1": "KSS / Bla\u017eena \u017d\u00e1kovicov\u00e1", "KSS / Viera Pt\u00e1\u010dovsk\u00e1": "KSS / Viera Pt\u00e1\u010dovsk\u00e1", "KSS / Jozef Hallon": "KSS / Jozef Hallon", "KSS / Vasi\u013e Kse\u0148ak": "KSS / Vasi\u013e Kse\u0148ak", "KSS / Jozef Ko\u017euch": "KSS / Jozef Ko\u017euch", "KSS / Igor Kr\u00e9ta": "KSS / Igor Kr\u00e9ta", "KSS / J\u00e1n Galanda": "KSS / J\u00e1n Galanda", "KSS / Miroslav Samiec": "KSS / Miroslav Samiec", "KSS / J\u00e1n Markus": "KSS / J\u00e1n Markus", "KSS / Peter Malackani\u010d": "KSS / Peter Malackani\u010d", "KSS / Miroslav Her\u00e1k": "KSS / Miroslav Her\u00e1k", "KSS / J\u00e1n Kopas": "KSS / J\u00e1n Kopas", "KSS / Marek Jur\u00edk": "KSS / Marek Jur\u00edk", "KSS / J\u00e1n Bu\u010dko": "KSS / J\u00e1n Bu\u010dko", "KSS / Vladim\u00edr Ma\u010duga": "KSS / Vladim\u00edr Ma\u010duga", "SDK\u00da-DS / Pavol Fre\u0161o": "SDK\u00da-DS / Pavol Fre\u0161o", "SDK\u00da-DS / Milan Roman": "SDK\u00da-DS / Milan Roman", "SDK\u00da-DS / Martin Tur\u010dan": "SDK\u00da-DS / Martin Tur\u010dan", "SDK\u00da-DS / Juraj K\u00e1\u010der": "SDK\u00da-DS / Juraj K\u00e1\u010der", "SDK\u00da-DS / Matej \u017diliak": "SDK\u00da-DS / Matej \u017diliak", "SDK\u00da-DS / J\u00e1n Spev\u00e1r": "SDK\u00da-DS / J\u00e1n Spev\u00e1r", "SDK\u00da-DS / Filip Lackovi\u010d": "SDK\u00da-DS / Filip Lackovi\u010d", "SDK\u00da-DS / Barbora Or\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Barbora Or\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Katar\u00edna \u010ci\u017em\u00e1rov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Katar\u00edna \u010ci\u017em\u00e1rov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Tiso\u0148": "SDK\u00da-DS / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Tiso\u0148", "SDK\u00da-DS / Anton Kup\u0161o": "SDK\u00da-DS / Anton Kup\u0161o", "SDK\u00da-DS / Nat\u00e1lia Novitzk\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Nat\u00e1lia Novitzk\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Du\u0161an Je\u017e\u00edk": "SDK\u00da-DS / Du\u0161an Je\u017e\u00edk", "SDK\u00da-DS / Valeri\u00e1n Poti\u010dn\u00fd": "SDK\u00da-DS / Valeri\u00e1n Poti\u010dn\u00fd", "SDK\u00da-DS / J\u00falius Piliar": "SDK\u00da-DS / J\u00falius Piliar", "SDK\u00da-DS / Tibor Ma\u0165a\u0161": "SDK\u00da-DS / Tibor Ma\u0165a\u0161", "SDK\u00da-DS / Peter Ottinger": "SDK\u00da-DS / Peter Ottinger", "SDK\u00da-DS / J\u00e1n Odzgan": "SDK\u00da-DS / J\u00e1n Odzgan", "SDK\u00da-DS / Roman Hrn\u010dir\u00edk": "SDK\u00da-DS / Roman Hrn\u010dir\u00edk", "SDK\u00da-DS / Peter H\u00faska": "SDK\u00da-DS / Peter H\u00faska", "SDK\u00da-DS / Slavom\u00edr Fre\u0161o": "SDK\u00da-DS / Slavom\u00edr Fre\u0161o", "SDK\u00da-DS / Anton Bajz\u00edk": "SDK\u00da-DS / Anton Bajz\u00edk", "SDK\u00da-DS / J\u00e1n Kesel\u00fd": "SDK\u00da-DS / J\u00e1n Kesel\u00fd", "SDK\u00da-DS / Juraj \u0160tekl\u00e1\u010d": "SDK\u00da-DS / Juraj \u0160tekl\u00e1\u010d", "SDK\u00da-DS / Judita Vavrekov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Judita Vavrekov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / \u0160tefan Macej\u00e1k": "SDK\u00da-DS / \u0160tefan Macej\u00e1k", "SDK\u00da-DS / Mat\u00fa\u0161 Molit\u00f3ris": "SDK\u00da-DS / Mat\u00fa\u0161 Molit\u00f3ris", "SDK\u00da-DS / J\u00e1n Brozman": "SDK\u00da-DS / J\u00e1n Brozman", "SDK\u00da-DS / Zuzana Mar\u0161alov\u00e1 Borikov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Zuzana Mar\u0161alov\u00e1 Borikov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Dagmar Raj\u010danova": "SDK\u00da-DS / Dagmar Raj\u010danova", "SDK\u00da-DS / Karol Gut": "SDK\u00da-DS / Karol Gut", "SDK\u00da-DS / Martin G\u00e1cik": "SDK\u00da-DS / Martin G\u00e1cik", "SDK\u00da-DS / Michal J\u00e1no\u0161\u00edk": "SDK\u00da-DS / Michal J\u00e1no\u0161\u00edk", "SDK\u00da-DS / Peter Ba\u010da": "SDK\u00da-DS / Peter Ba\u010da", "SDK\u00da-DS / J\u00e1n Kokor\u00e1k": "SDK\u00da-DS / J\u00e1n Kokor\u00e1k", "SDK\u00da-DS / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Cmero": "SDK\u00da-DS / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Cmero", "SDK\u00da-DS / Vojtech Menyh\u00e1rt": "SDK\u00da-DS / Vojtech Menyh\u00e1rt", "SDK\u00da-DS / Vladim\u00edr Dani\u0161": "SDK\u00da-DS / Vladim\u00edr Dani\u0161", "SDK\u00da-DS / Zuzana Barciov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Zuzana Barciov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Radovan Jon\u00e1\u0161": "SDK\u00da-DS / Radovan Jon\u00e1\u0161", "SDK\u00da-DS / Daniel Vidovi\u010d": "SDK\u00da-DS / Daniel Vidovi\u010d", "SDK\u00da-DS / Rajmund Fiala": "SDK\u00da-DS / Rajmund Fiala", "SDK\u00da-DS / Martin Hal\u00e1s": "SDK\u00da-DS / Martin Hal\u00e1s", "SDK\u00da-DS / Rastislav Jusko": "SDK\u00da-DS / Rastislav Jusko", "SDK\u00da-DS / Ladislav \u0160tibranyi": "SDK\u00da-DS / Ladislav \u0160tibranyi", "SDK\u00da-DS / Michal Mr\u00e1z": "SDK\u00da-DS / Michal Mr\u00e1z", "SDK\u00da-DS / Zden\u011bk Kamhal": "SDK\u00da-DS / Zden\u011bk Kamhal", "SDK\u00da-DS / Gabriela Emrichov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Gabriela Emrichov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Dominika Vrbick\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Dominika Vrbick\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Marta \u010cern\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Marta \u010cern\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Zuzana Luk\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Zuzana Luk\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Richard \u010cerm\u00e1k": "SDK\u00da-DS / Richard \u010cerm\u00e1k", "SDK\u00da-DS / Patrik \u0160tofej": "SDK\u00da-DS / Patrik \u0160tofej", "SDK\u00da-DS / Miroslav Jobus": "SDK\u00da-DS / Miroslav Jobus", "SDK\u00da-DS / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Dobrock\u00fd": "SDK\u00da-DS / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Dobrock\u00fd", "SDK\u00da-DS / D\u00e1vid Hol\u00fd": "SDK\u00da-DS / D\u00e1vid Hol\u00fd", "SDK\u00da-DS / Martin \u0160\u00e1rm\u00e1ny": "SDK\u00da-DS / Martin \u0160\u00e1rm\u00e1ny", "SDK\u00da-DS / Marianna Vaculkov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Marianna Vaculkov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Vladim\u00edr Hronsk\u00fd": "SDK\u00da-DS / Vladim\u00edr Hronsk\u00fd", "SDK\u00da-DS / Janka \u017dilov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Janka \u017dilov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Jana Plankov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Jana Plankov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Dagmar Irena Burcelov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Dagmar Irena Burcelov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Peter Trstensk\u00fd": "SDK\u00da-DS / Peter Trstensk\u00fd", "SDK\u00da-DS / Ivana Hrom\u00e1dkov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Ivana Hrom\u00e1dkov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Michal Pol\u00e1k": "SDK\u00da-DS / Michal Pol\u00e1k", "SDK\u00da-DS / Peter Nov\u00e1k": "SDK\u00da-DS / Peter Nov\u00e1k", "SDK\u00da-DS / Peter Mucha": "SDK\u00da-DS / Peter Mucha", "SDK\u00da-DS / Vanda Dem\u010d\u00e1kov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Vanda Dem\u010d\u00e1kov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Nikola \u0160trb\u00e1kov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Nikola \u0160trb\u00e1kov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Hus\u00e1r": "SDK\u00da-DS / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Hus\u00e1r", "SDK\u00da-DS / O\u013ega Dzurkov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / O\u013ega Dzurkov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Matej Kr\u00e1lik": "SDK\u00da-DS / Matej Kr\u00e1lik", "SDK\u00da-DS / Patr\u00edcia Forrov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Patr\u00edcia Forrov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Kamenist\u00fd": "SDK\u00da-DS / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Kamenist\u00fd", "SDK\u00da-DS / Pavol Dobrota": "SDK\u00da-DS / Pavol Dobrota", "SDK\u00da-DS / Branislav Bedn\u00e1rik": "SDK\u00da-DS / Branislav Bedn\u00e1rik", "SDK\u00da-DS / Martin \u010cern\u00fd": "SDK\u00da-DS / Martin \u010cern\u00fd", "SDK\u00da-DS / Milo\u0161 Skatulok": "SDK\u00da-DS / Milo\u0161 Skatulok", "SDK\u00da-DS / M\u00e1rio Borza": "SDK\u00da-DS / M\u00e1rio Borza", "SDK\u00da-DS / Zuzana Maxianov\u00e1 Tobia\u0161ov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Zuzana Maxianov\u00e1 Tobia\u0161ov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Erika Ko\u017e\u00e1kov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Erika Ko\u017e\u00e1kov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Patr\u00edcia Krch\u0148av\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Patr\u00edcia Krch\u0148av\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Ladislav Barto\u0161": "SDK\u00da-DS / Ladislav Barto\u0161", "SDK\u00da-DS / Adri\u00e1n Kapust\u00edk": "SDK\u00da-DS / Adri\u00e1n Kapust\u00edk", "SDK\u00da-DS / Pavel Chropovsk\u00fd": "SDK\u00da-DS / Pavel Chropovsk\u00fd", "SDK\u00da-DS / Martin Kr\u00ed\u017e": "SDK\u00da-DS / Martin Kr\u00ed\u017e", "SDK\u00da-DS / Peter Juh\u00e1sz": "SDK\u00da-DS / Peter Juh\u00e1sz", "SDK\u00da-DS / Celest\u00edn \u010cern\u00e1k": "SDK\u00da-DS / Celest\u00edn \u010cern\u00e1k", "SDK\u00da-DS / Peter Zubek": "SDK\u00da-DS / Peter Zubek", "SDK\u00da-DS / J\u00falius Mr\u00e1z": "SDK\u00da-DS / J\u00falius Mr\u00e1z", "SDK\u00da-DS / Vladim\u00edr Koc\u00far": "SDK\u00da-DS / Vladim\u00edr Koc\u00far", "SDK\u00da-DS / Marta Pr\u00edvarov\u00e1-\u010cujd\u00edkov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Marta Pr\u00edvarov\u00e1-\u010cujd\u00edkov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Andrej Dobrock\u00fd": "SDK\u00da-DS / Andrej Dobrock\u00fd", "SDK\u00da-DS / Katar\u00edna G\u00e4rtnerov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Katar\u00edna G\u00e4rtnerov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Rudolf Oravec": "SDK\u00da-DS / Rudolf Oravec", "SDK\u00da-DS / Rudolf Machov\u010d\u00e1k": "SDK\u00da-DS / Rudolf Machov\u010d\u00e1k", "SDK\u00da-DS / Ladislav Vo\u013en\u00fd": "SDK\u00da-DS / Ladislav Vo\u013en\u00fd", "SDK\u00da-DS / R\u00f3bert Len\u010d": "SDK\u00da-DS / R\u00f3bert Len\u010d", "SDK\u00da-DS / Pavel Schwarz": "SDK\u00da-DS / Pavel Schwarz", "SDK\u00da-DS / Michal Suchodolinsk\u00fd": "SDK\u00da-DS / Michal Suchodolinsk\u00fd", "SDK\u00da-DS / Jana Vaculov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Jana Vaculov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Kvetoslava Sokolov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Kvetoslava Sokolov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Juraj Horan": "SDK\u00da-DS / Juraj Horan", "SDK\u00da-DS / \u0160tefan Dvor\u010d\u00e1k": "SDK\u00da-DS / \u0160tefan Dvor\u010d\u00e1k", "SDK\u00da-DS / Igor F\u00f6ldes": "SDK\u00da-DS / Igor F\u00f6ldes", "SDK\u00da-DS / Milan Kocian": "SDK\u00da-DS / Milan Kocian", "SDK\u00da-DS / Igor \u010cerm\u00e1k": "SDK\u00da-DS / Igor \u010cerm\u00e1k", "SDK\u00da-DS / Peter Drgo\u0148": "SDK\u00da-DS / Peter Drgo\u0148", "SDK\u00da-DS / Paul\u00edna G\u00e1bor\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Paul\u00edna G\u00e1bor\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Michal Duba": "SDK\u00da-DS / Michal Duba", "SDK\u00da-DS / Mirka Fia\u010danov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Mirka Fia\u010danov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Jozef Lul\u00e1k": "SDK\u00da-DS / Jozef Lul\u00e1k", "SDK\u00da-DS / Miroslav Ove\u010dka": "SDK\u00da-DS / Miroslav Ove\u010dka", "SDK\u00da-DS / Franti\u0161ka Mr\u00e1zov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Franti\u0161ka Mr\u00e1zov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Janka Kro\u0161l\u00e1kov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Janka Kro\u0161l\u00e1kov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Du\u0161an Ru\u017ei\u010dka": "SDK\u00da-DS / Du\u0161an Ru\u017ei\u010dka", "SDK\u00da-DS / Tichom\u00edr Ivan": "SDK\u00da-DS / Tichom\u00edr Ivan", "SDK\u00da-DS / Viera Haru\u0161tiakov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Viera Haru\u0161tiakov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Peter Hromn\u00edk": "SDK\u00da-DS / Peter Hromn\u00edk", "SDK\u00da-DS / Du\u0161an Krivjan\u010din": "SDK\u00da-DS / Du\u0161an Krivjan\u010din", "SDK\u00da-DS / Silvia Gor\u00e1sov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Silvia Gor\u00e1sov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Michal Piliar": "SDK\u00da-DS / Michal Piliar", "SDK\u00da-DS / Michaela Szu\u0161\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Michaela Szu\u0161\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / J\u00e1n Dulla": "SDK\u00da-DS / J\u00e1n Dulla", "SDK\u00da-DS / Denisa Bedn\u00e1rov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Denisa Bedn\u00e1rov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Branislav Andreansk\u00fd": "SDK\u00da-DS / Branislav Andreansk\u00fd", "SDK\u00da-DS / Ivan Ben\u010d\u00edk": "SDK\u00da-DS / Ivan Ben\u010d\u00edk", "SDK\u00da-DS / Jana Hol\u00edncov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Jana Hol\u00edncov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Alena \u010cerm\u00e1kov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Alena \u010cerm\u00e1kov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Richard Nagy": "SDK\u00da-DS / Richard Nagy", "SDK\u00da-DS / Eva Chrappov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Eva Chrappov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Bohu\u0161 Len\u010d\u00e9\u0161": "SDK\u00da-DS / Bohu\u0161 Len\u010d\u00e9\u0161", "SDK\u00da-DS / Daniel Soj\u010d\u00e1k": "SDK\u00da-DS / Daniel Soj\u010d\u00e1k", "SDK\u00da-DS / Pavol Sukup": "SDK\u00da-DS / Pavol Sukup", "SDK\u00da-DS / Pavol Andra\u0161\u00edk": "SDK\u00da-DS / Pavol Andra\u0161\u00edk", "SDK\u00da-DS / J\u00e1n Taba\u010dek": "SDK\u00da-DS / J\u00e1n Taba\u010dek", "SDK\u00da-DS / Radovan \u010caj\u00e1gi": "SDK\u00da-DS / Radovan \u010caj\u00e1gi", "SDK\u00da-DS / Marek Cabadaj": "SDK\u00da-DS / Marek Cabadaj", "SDK\u00da-DS / Jozef \u010eurovi\u010d": "SDK\u00da-DS / Jozef \u010eurovi\u010d", "SDK\u00da-DS / Marek Mikul\u00edk": "SDK\u00da-DS / Marek Mikul\u00edk", "SDK\u00da-DS / Martin K\u0148azovick\u00fd": "SDK\u00da-DS / Martin K\u0148azovick\u00fd", "SDK\u00da-DS / Jozef Moln\u00e1r": "SDK\u00da-DS / Jozef Moln\u00e1r", "SDK\u00da-DS / Igor Doka": "SDK\u00da-DS / Igor Doka", "SDK\u00da-DS / Milan Trstensk\u00fd": "SDK\u00da-DS / Milan Trstensk\u00fd", "SDK\u00da-DS / Marek \u010corba": "SDK\u00da-DS / Marek \u010corba", "SDK\u00da-DS / Juraj Hanul\u00edk": "SDK\u00da-DS / Juraj Hanul\u00edk", "SDK\u00da-DS / Tibor Klema": "SDK\u00da-DS / Tibor Klema", "SDK\u00da-DS / Jana N\u00e9methov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Jana N\u00e9methov\u00e1", "SDK\u00da-DS / Martin Gajdo\u0161": "SDK\u00da-DS / Martin Gajdo\u0161", "SDK\u00da-DS / Ren\u00e1ta Pap\u0161ov\u00e1": "SDK\u00da-DS / Ren\u00e1ta Pap\u0161ov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Robert Fico": "SMER-SD / Robert Fico", "SMER-SD / Robert Kali\u0148\u00e1k": "SMER-SD / Robert Kali\u0148\u00e1k", "SMER-SD / Peter Pellegrini": "SMER-SD / Peter Pellegrini", "SMER-SD / Peter Ka\u017eim\u00edr": "SMER-SD / Peter Ka\u017eim\u00edr", "SMER-SD / Marek Ma\u010fari\u010d": "SMER-SD / Marek Ma\u010fari\u010d", "SMER-SD / Peter \u017diga": "SMER-SD / Peter \u017diga", "SMER-SD / Miroslav Laj\u010d\u00e1k": "SMER-SD / Miroslav Laj\u010d\u00e1k", "SMER-SD / Richard Ra\u0161i": "SMER-SD / Richard Ra\u0161i", "SMER-SD / J\u00e1n Po\u010diatek": "SMER-SD / J\u00e1n Po\u010diatek", "SMER-SD / J\u00e1n Richter": "SMER-SD / J\u00e1n Richter", "SMER-SD / Juraj Blan\u00e1r": "SMER-SD / Juraj Blan\u00e1r", "SMER-SD / Martin Glv\u00e1\u010d": "SMER-SD / Martin Glv\u00e1\u010d", "SMER-SD / Jaroslav Ba\u0161ka": "SMER-SD / Jaroslav Ba\u0161ka", "SMER-SD / Jana La\u0161\u0161\u00e1kov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Jana La\u0161\u0161\u00e1kov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / \u013dubom\u00edr V\u00e1\u017eny": "SMER-SD / \u013dubom\u00edr V\u00e1\u017eny", "SMER-SD / \u013dubom\u00edr Jahn\u00e1tek": "SMER-SD / \u013dubom\u00edr Jahn\u00e1tek", "SMER-SD / Peter Chud\u00edk": "SMER-SD / Peter Chud\u00edk", "SMER-SD / Tibor Glenda": "SMER-SD / Tibor Glenda", "SMER-SD / Stanislav Kub\u00e1nek": "SMER-SD / Stanislav Kub\u00e1nek", "SMER-SD / Vladim\u00edr Fai\u010d": "SMER-SD / Vladim\u00edr Fai\u010d", "SMER-SD / Du\u0161an \u010caplovi\u010d": "SMER-SD / Du\u0161an \u010caplovi\u010d", "SMER-SD / J\u00e1n Podmanick\u00fd": "SMER-SD / J\u00e1n Podmanick\u00fd", "SMER-SD / Viktor Strom\u010dek": "SMER-SD / Viktor Strom\u010dek", "SMER-SD / R\u00f3bert Madej": "SMER-SD / R\u00f3bert Madej", "SMER-SD / Erik Tom\u00e1\u0161": "SMER-SD / Erik Tom\u00e1\u0161", "SMER-SD / Miroslav \u010c\u00ed\u017e": "SMER-SD / Miroslav \u010c\u00ed\u017e", "SMER-SD / Igor Federi\u010d": "SMER-SD / Igor Federi\u010d", "SMER-SD / Igor Choma": "SMER-SD / Igor Choma", "SMER-SD / Denisa Sakov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Denisa Sakov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Du\u0161an Galis": "SMER-SD / Du\u0161an Galis", "SMER-SD / Mari\u00e1n Salo\u0148": "SMER-SD / Mari\u00e1n Salo\u0148", "SMER-SD / Pavol Pavlis": "SMER-SD / Pavol Pavlis", "SMER-SD / Ladislav Kamenick\u00fd": "SMER-SD / Ladislav Kamenick\u00fd", "SMER-SD / Du\u0161an Mu\u0148ko": "SMER-SD / Du\u0161an Mu\u0148ko", "SMER-SD / Maro\u0161 Kondr\u00f3t": "SMER-SD / Maro\u0161 Kondr\u00f3t", "SMER-SD / Du\u0161an Jarjabek": "SMER-SD / Du\u0161an Jarjabek", "SMER-SD / Jozef Valock\u00fd": "SMER-SD / Jozef Valock\u00fd", "SMER-SD / \u013dubo\u0161 Blaha": "SMER-SD / \u013dubo\u0161 Blaha", "SMER-SD / \u013dubom\u00edr Petr\u00e1k": "SMER-SD / \u013dubom\u00edr Petr\u00e1k", "SMER-SD / R\u00f3bert Puci": "SMER-SD / R\u00f3bert Puci", "SMER-SD / \u013dubom\u00edr \u017deliezka": "SMER-SD / \u013dubom\u00edr \u017deliezka", "SMER-SD / Vladim\u00edr Mateji\u010dka": "SMER-SD / Vladim\u00edr Mateji\u010dka", "SMER-SD / J\u00e1n Senko": "SMER-SD / J\u00e1n Senko", "SMER-SD / Jana Va\u013eov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Jana Va\u013eov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Du\u0161an Bublav\u00fd": "SMER-SD / Du\u0161an Bublav\u00fd", "SMER-SD / Monika Jankovsk\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Monika Jankovsk\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Vojtech Ferencz": "SMER-SD / Vojtech Ferencz", "SMER-SD / Branislav Ondru\u0161": "SMER-SD / Branislav Ondru\u0161", "SMER-SD / Jozef Burian": "SMER-SD / Jozef Burian", "SMER-SD / Jozef Bu\u010dek": "SMER-SD / Jozef Bu\u010dek", "SMER-SD / Emil \u010eurov\u010d\u00edk": "SMER-SD / Emil \u010eurov\u010d\u00edk", "SMER-SD / Pavol Goga": "SMER-SD / Pavol Goga", "SMER-SD / J\u00e1n Kvorka": "SMER-SD / J\u00e1n Kvorka", "SMER-SD / M\u00e1ria Jan\u00edkov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / M\u00e1ria Jan\u00edkov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Peter \u0160uca": "SMER-SD / Peter \u0160uca", "SMER-SD / Boris Susko": "SMER-SD / Boris Susko", "SMER-SD / Rastislav Chovanec": "SMER-SD / Rastislav Chovanec", "SMER-SD / Michal Baga\u010dka": "SMER-SD / Michal Baga\u010dka", "SMER-SD / August\u00edn Hamb\u00e1lek": "SMER-SD / August\u00edn Hamb\u00e1lek", "SMER-SD / Peter N\u00e1hlik": "SMER-SD / Peter N\u00e1hlik", "SMER-SD / O\u013ega Nachtmannov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / O\u013ega Nachtmannov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Mari\u00e1n K\u00e9ry": "SMER-SD / Mari\u00e1n K\u00e9ry", "SMER-SD / Mikul\u00e1\u0161 Krajkovi\u010d": "SMER-SD / Mikul\u00e1\u0161 Krajkovi\u010d", "SMER-SD / Milan Pan\u00e1\u010dek": "SMER-SD / Milan Pan\u00e1\u010dek", "SMER-SD / Vladim\u00edr Bal\u00e1\u017e": "SMER-SD / Vladim\u00edr Bal\u00e1\u017e", "SMER-SD / Jozef Je\u017e\u00edk": "SMER-SD / Jozef Je\u017e\u00edk", "SMER-SD / Martin Nemky": "SMER-SD / Martin Nemky", "SMER-SD / Milan Moj\u0161": "SMER-SD / Milan Moj\u0161", "SMER-SD / Ladislav Andre\u00e1nsky": "SMER-SD / Ladislav Andre\u00e1nsky", "SMER-SD / Darina Gab\u00e1niov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Darina Gab\u00e1niov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / \u013dubo\u0161 Martin\u00e1k": "SMER-SD / \u013dubo\u0161 Martin\u00e1k", "SMER-SD / Viliam Jasa\u0148": "SMER-SD / Viliam Jasa\u0148", "SMER-SD / Ivan Varga": "SMER-SD / Ivan Varga", "SMER-SD / Marek Mitterp\u00e1k": "SMER-SD / Marek Mitterp\u00e1k", "SMER-SD / Peter Fitz": "SMER-SD / Peter Fitz", "SMER-SD / \u0160tefan Ga\u0161parovi\u010d": "SMER-SD / \u0160tefan Ga\u0161parovi\u010d", "SMER-SD / Mari\u00e1n Z\u00e1humensk\u00fd": "SMER-SD / Mari\u00e1n Z\u00e1humensk\u00fd", "SMER-SD / Jaroslav Demian": "SMER-SD / Jaroslav Demian", "SMER-SD / Bibi\u00e1na Riapo\u0161ov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Bibi\u00e1na Riapo\u0161ov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Lea Gre\u010dkov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Lea Gre\u010dkov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Juraj Gedra": "SMER-SD / Juraj Gedra", "SMER-SD / Andrej Koles\u00edk": "SMER-SD / Andrej Koles\u00edk", "SMER-SD / Peter Kalivoda": "SMER-SD / Peter Kalivoda", "SMER-SD / Em\u00edlia M\u00fcllerov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Em\u00edlia M\u00fcllerov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Milan G\u00e9ci": "SMER-SD / Milan G\u00e9ci", "SMER-SD / Viera Ku\u010derov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Viera Ku\u010derov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Eva Hufkov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Eva Hufkov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Peter Maru\u0161inec": "SMER-SD / Peter Maru\u0161inec", "SMER-SD / Magda Ko\u0161\u00fatov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Magda Ko\u0161\u00fatov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Viliam Holeva": "SMER-SD / Viliam Holeva", "SMER-SD / Tibor Lebock\u00fd": "SMER-SD / Tibor Lebock\u00fd", "SMER-SD / Milan Hal\u00faz": "SMER-SD / Milan Hal\u00faz", "SMER-SD / Vladislav Petr\u00e1\u0161": "SMER-SD / Vladislav Petr\u00e1\u0161", "SMER-SD / Slavom\u00edr Drozd": "SMER-SD / Slavom\u00edr Drozd", "SMER-SD / Rastislav \u010cep\u00e1k": "SMER-SD / Rastislav \u010cep\u00e1k", "SMER-SD / Mari\u00e1n Kova\u010d\u00f3cy": "SMER-SD / Mari\u00e1n Kova\u010d\u00f3cy", "SMER-SD / Franti\u0161ek Petro": "SMER-SD / Franti\u0161ek Petro", "SMER-SD / Otto Brixi": "SMER-SD / Otto Brixi", "SMER-SD / Miroslav \u010cell\u00e1r": "SMER-SD / Miroslav \u010cell\u00e1r", "SMER-SD / Anton\u00edn Cico\u0148": "SMER-SD / Anton\u00edn Cico\u0148", "SMER-SD / J\u00e1n Babi\u010d": "SMER-SD / J\u00e1n Babi\u010d", "SMER-SD / Michal Luk\u0161a": "SMER-SD / Michal Luk\u0161a", "SMER-SD / Jozef Andrej\u010d\u00e1k": "SMER-SD / Jozef Andrej\u010d\u00e1k", "SMER-SD / Viera \u0160edivcov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Viera \u0160edivcov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / \u0160tefan Hreha": "SMER-SD / \u0160tefan Hreha", "SMER-SD / J\u00e1n Zvon\u00e1r": "SMER-SD / J\u00e1n Zvon\u00e1r", "SMER-SD / Viera Maz\u00farov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Viera Maz\u00farov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Peter Ga\u017ei": "SMER-SD / Peter Ga\u017ei", "SMER-SD / Svetlana Pavlovi\u010dov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Svetlana Pavlovi\u010dov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Radko Gavliak": "SMER-SD / Radko Gavliak", "SMER-SD / Vladim\u00edr Mac\u00e1\u0161ek": "SMER-SD / Vladim\u00edr Mac\u00e1\u0161ek", "SMER-SD / Peter Obrim\u010d\u00e1k": "SMER-SD / Peter Obrim\u010d\u00e1k", "SMER-SD / J\u00e1n Ra\u010d\u00e1k": "SMER-SD / J\u00e1n Ra\u010d\u00e1k", "SMER-SD / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Alscher": "SMER-SD / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Alscher", "SMER-SD / Franti\u0161ek Mr\u00e1zik": "SMER-SD / Franti\u0161ek Mr\u00e1zik", "SMER-SD / Igor Nic\u00e1k": "SMER-SD / Igor Nic\u00e1k", "SMER-SD / Iveta Hanul\u00edkov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Iveta Hanul\u00edkov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / J\u00e1n Hrub\u00fd": "SMER-SD / J\u00e1n Hrub\u00fd", "SMER-SD / Juraj Gerlici": "SMER-SD / Juraj Gerlici", "SMER-SD / \u013dubom\u00edr Bl\u00e1ha": "SMER-SD / \u013dubom\u00edr Bl\u00e1ha", "SMER-SD / Vladim\u00edr J\u00e1no\u0161\u00edk": "SMER-SD / Vladim\u00edr J\u00e1no\u0161\u00edk", "SMER-SD / Branislav H\u00e1morn\u00edk": "SMER-SD / Branislav H\u00e1morn\u00edk", "SMER-SD / Helena Boh\u00e1tov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Helena Boh\u00e1tov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Ku\u010dera": "SMER-SD / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Ku\u010dera", "SMER-SD / Katar\u00edna Jankack\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Katar\u00edna Jankack\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Mari\u00e1n M\u00fadry": "SMER-SD / Mari\u00e1n M\u00fadry", "SMER-SD / Peter Sokol": "SMER-SD / Peter Sokol", "SMER-SD / Andrea \u017diakov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Andrea \u017diakov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Martin Lidaj": "SMER-SD / Martin Lidaj", "SMER-SD / \u013dubom\u00edr Ha\u0161ko": "SMER-SD / \u013dubom\u00edr Ha\u0161ko", "SMER-SD / Kvetoslava Hejbalov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Kvetoslava Hejbalov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Du\u0161an Petr\u00edk": "SMER-SD / Du\u0161an Petr\u00edk", "SMER-SD / \u013dubom\u00edr Komara": "SMER-SD / \u013dubom\u00edr Komara", "SMER-SD / J\u00falius La\u0161\u0161an": "SMER-SD / J\u00falius La\u0161\u0161an", "SMER-SD / Zita Koprdov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Zita Koprdov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Milan Berec": "SMER-SD / Milan Berec", "SMER-SD / Mat\u00fa\u0161 \u0160utaj - E\u0161tok": "SMER-SD / Mat\u00fa\u0161 \u0160utaj - E\u0161tok", "SMER-SD / Ladislav B\u00f3di": "SMER-SD / Ladislav B\u00f3di", "SMER-SD / Mari\u00e1n Siekela": "SMER-SD / Mari\u00e1n Siekela", "SMER-SD / Marek Ill\u00e9\u0161": "SMER-SD / Marek Ill\u00e9\u0161", "SMER-SD / Jozef \u017dil\u00edk": "SMER-SD / Jozef \u017dil\u00edk", "SMER-SD / Silvia P\u00fa\u010dikov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Silvia P\u00fa\u010dikov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Martina Ga\u0161parov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Martina Ga\u0161parov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Janka Krahul\u00edkov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Janka Krahul\u00edkov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Marta Gubrick\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Marta Gubrick\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Jana Malinkov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / Jana Malinkov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Alexander Da\u0161ko": "SMER-SD / Alexander Da\u0161ko", "SMER-SD / J\u00e1n Elzer": "SMER-SD / J\u00e1n Elzer", "SMER-SD / J\u00falia G\u00e1lov\u00e1": "SMER-SD / J\u00falia G\u00e1lov\u00e1", "SMER-SD / Martin Luka\u010dovi\u010d": "SMER-SD / Martin Luka\u010dovi\u010d", "KDH / J\u00e1n Fige\u013e": "KDH / J\u00e1n Fige\u013e", "KDH / Miroslava Szitov\u00e1": "KDH / Miroslava Szitov\u00e1", "KDH / Peter Belinsk\u00fd": "KDH / Peter Belinsk\u00fd", "KDH / J\u00falius Brocka": "KDH / J\u00falius Brocka", "KDH / J\u00e1n Hudack\u00fd": "KDH / J\u00e1n Hudack\u00fd", "KDH / Milo\u0161 Morav\u010d\u00edk": "KDH / Milo\u0161 Morav\u010d\u00edk", "KDH / Pavol Zajac": "KDH / Pavol Zajac", "KDH / Pavol Hru\u0161ovsk\u00fd": "KDH / Pavol Hru\u0161ovsk\u00fd", "KDH / Pavol Abrhan": "KDH / Pavol Abrhan", "KDH / Franti\u0161ek Orlovsk\u00fd": "KDH / Franti\u0161ek Orlovsk\u00fd", "KDH / Marian Faktor": "KDH / Marian Faktor", "KDH / Alojz P\u0159idal": "KDH / Alojz P\u0159idal", "KDH / Jozef Bob\u00edk": "KDH / Jozef Bob\u00edk", "KDH / Mari\u00e1n Rado\u0161ovsk\u00fd": "KDH / Mari\u00e1n Rado\u0161ovsk\u00fd", "KDH / Peter Mur\u00e1nsky": "KDH / Peter Mur\u00e1nsky", "KDH / Du\u0161an Pek\u00e1r": "KDH / Du\u0161an Pek\u00e1r", "KDH / Mari\u00e1n Sop\u010d\u00e1k": "KDH / Mari\u00e1n Sop\u010d\u00e1k", "KDH / Eva Grey": "KDH / Eva Grey", "KDH / Marek Michal\u010d\u00edk": "KDH / Marek Michal\u010d\u00edk", "KDH / Alb\u00edn Masla\u0148\u00e1k": "KDH / Alb\u00edn Masla\u0148\u00e1k", "KDH / Radovan Gond\u017e\u00far": "KDH / Radovan Gond\u017e\u00far", "KDH / Ren\u00e1ta Ocilkov\u00e1": "KDH / Ren\u00e1ta Ocilkov\u00e1", "KDH / Stanislav Kahanec": "KDH / Stanislav Kahanec", "KDH / Michal Sla\u0161\u0165an": "KDH / Michal Sla\u0161\u0165an", "KDH / Norbert Luk\u00e1n": "KDH / Norbert Luk\u00e1n", "KDH / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Domin": "KDH / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Domin", "KDH / Milan Majersk\u00fd": "KDH / Milan Majersk\u00fd", "KDH / Ivan Uhliarik": "KDH / Ivan Uhliarik", "KDH / \u013dubica \u010cern\u00e1": "KDH / \u013dubica \u010cern\u00e1", "KDH / Vladim\u00edr Sirotka": "KDH / Vladim\u00edr Sirotka", "KDH / Jozef Miklo\u0161ko": "KDH / Jozef Miklo\u0161ko", "KDH / Marek Mes\u00e1ro\u0161": "KDH / Marek Mes\u00e1ro\u0161", "KDH / J\u00e1n Beljak": "KDH / J\u00e1n Beljak", "KDH / J\u00e1n Oparty": "KDH / J\u00e1n Oparty", "KDH / Peter Dobe\u0161": "KDH / Peter Dobe\u0161", "KDH / Ferdinand Exner": "KDH / Ferdinand Exner", "KDH / O\u013ega Fe\u010dikov\u00e1": "KDH / O\u013ega Fe\u010dikov\u00e1", "KDH / J\u00e1n Gab\u010do": "KDH / J\u00e1n Gab\u010do", "KDH / J\u00e1n Porubsk\u00fd": "KDH / J\u00e1n Porubsk\u00fd", "KDH / Mari\u00e1n \u010cau\u010d\u00edk": "KDH / Mari\u00e1n \u010cau\u010d\u00edk", "KDH / Peter Stanko": "KDH / Peter Stanko", "KDH / Jozef Kisl\u00edk": "KDH / Jozef Kisl\u00edk", "KDH / Pavel Pavl\u00e1sek": "KDH / Pavel Pavl\u00e1sek", "KDH / Andrej Klapica": "KDH / Andrej Klapica", "KDH / J\u00e1n Jakubi\u0161in": "KDH / J\u00e1n Jakubi\u0161in", "KDH / J\u00e1n Van\u010do": "KDH / J\u00e1n Van\u010do", "KDH / M\u00e1ria Sliacka": "KDH / M\u00e1ria Sliacka", "KDH / Katar\u00edna Tuh\u00e1rska": "KDH / Katar\u00edna Tuh\u00e1rska", "KDH / Jozef \u010curlej": "KDH / Jozef \u010curlej", "KDH / J\u00e1n Miho": "KDH / J\u00e1n Miho", "KDH / Daniel Slivka": "KDH / Daniel Slivka", "KDH / Darius Hatok": "KDH / Darius Hatok", "KDH / Marcel \u010eurkovsk\u00fd": "KDH / Marcel \u010eurkovsk\u00fd", "KDH / J\u00e1n Kme\u0165": "KDH / J\u00e1n Kme\u0165", "KDH / Milan Hovanec": "KDH / Milan Hovanec", "KDH / J\u00e1n \u010cuchran": "KDH / J\u00e1n \u010cuchran", "KDH / Roman Sova": "KDH / Roman Sova", "KDH / J\u00e1n Morovi\u010d": "KDH / J\u00e1n Morovi\u010d", "KDH / Matej Kr\u010dm\u00e1r": "KDH / Matej Kr\u010dm\u00e1r", "KDH / Ivan R\u00e1c": "KDH / Ivan R\u00e1c", "KDH / Miloslav Hatala": "KDH / Miloslav Hatala", "KDH / Anton \u0160motl\u00e1k": "KDH / Anton \u0160motl\u00e1k", "KDH / Anna Dudov\u00e1": "KDH / Anna Dudov\u00e1", "KDH / Martin Baxa": "KDH / Martin Baxa", "KDH / Mari\u00e1n Javorka": "KDH / Mari\u00e1n Javorka", "KDH / Katar\u00edna Hud\u00e1kov\u00e1": "KDH / Katar\u00edna Hud\u00e1kov\u00e1", "KDH / Ivan Sadovsk\u00fd": "KDH / Ivan Sadovsk\u00fd", "KDH / M\u00e1ria Jakubov\u00e1": "KDH / M\u00e1ria Jakubov\u00e1", "KDH / Zuzana Rattajov\u00e1": "KDH / Zuzana Rattajov\u00e1", "KDH / Alojz Hlina": "KDH / Alojz Hlina", "KDH / Jana Miklo\u0161kov\u00e1": "KDH / Jana Miklo\u0161kov\u00e1", "KDH / Miroslav Herman": "KDH / Miroslav Herman", "KDH / Jaroslav Pola\u010dek": "KDH / Jaroslav Pola\u010dek", "KDH / Peter Jo\u0161tiak": "KDH / Peter Jo\u0161tiak", "KDH / Iveta Hatalov\u00e1": "KDH / Iveta Hatalov\u00e1", "KDH / Martin Kraj\u010dovi\u010d": "KDH / Martin Kraj\u010dovi\u010d", "KDH / Martin Jech": "KDH / Martin Jech", "KDH / Igor Geletka": "KDH / Igor Geletka", "KDH / Milo\u0161 Zaujec": "KDH / Milo\u0161 Zaujec", "KDH / Martin Novodomec": "KDH / Martin Novodomec", "KDH / Mikul\u00e1\u0161 Krippel": "KDH / Mikul\u00e1\u0161 Krippel", "KDH / Miroslav Tu\u010dn\u00edk": "KDH / Miroslav Tu\u010dn\u00edk", "KDH / Mari\u00e1n Benko": "KDH / Mari\u00e1n Benko", "KDH / J\u00e1n Nigut": "KDH / J\u00e1n Nigut", "KDH / Rudolf Michalov": "KDH / Rudolf Michalov", "KDH / Viera Kimerlingov\u00e1": "KDH / Viera Kimerlingov\u00e1", "KDH / Peter Dvoran": "KDH / Peter Dvoran", "KDH / Daniel Bago": "KDH / Daniel Bago", "KDH / Jaroslav Ur\u00edk": "KDH / Jaroslav Ur\u00edk", "KDH / Miroslav Fabian": "KDH / Miroslav Fabian", "KDH / \u013dudmila R\u00e9v\u00e9sov\u00e1": "KDH / \u013dudmila R\u00e9v\u00e9sov\u00e1", "KDH / Martina Uli\u010dn\u00e1": "KDH / Martina Uli\u010dn\u00e1", "KDH / Juraj Putirka": "KDH / Juraj Putirka", "KDH / Mari\u00e1n Babej": "KDH / Mari\u00e1n Babej", "KDH / Peter \u0160tuller": "KDH / Peter \u0160tuller", "KDH / Jana Nachtmannov\u00e1": "KDH / Jana Nachtmannov\u00e1", "KDH / Katar\u00edna Hozl\u00e1rov\u00e1": "KDH / Katar\u00edna Hozl\u00e1rov\u00e1", "KDH / J\u00e1n Kotu\u013ea": "KDH / J\u00e1n Kotu\u013ea", "KDH / Martin Vrana": "KDH / Martin Vrana", "KDH / Nata\u0161a \u017dembov\u00e1": "KDH / Nata\u0161a \u017dembov\u00e1", "KDH / Miroslav Gleva\u0148\u00e1k": "KDH / Miroslav Gleva\u0148\u00e1k", "KDH / J\u00e1n Kokarda": "KDH / J\u00e1n Kokarda", "KDH / Branislav Borovsk\u00fd": "KDH / Branislav Borovsk\u00fd", "KDH / Gerda Fodorov\u00e1": "KDH / Gerda Fodorov\u00e1", "KDH / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Jedin\u00e1k": "KDH / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Jedin\u00e1k", "KDH / Radovan Horv\u00e1th": "KDH / Radovan Horv\u00e1th", "KDH / Michal Mudr\u00e1k": "KDH / Michal Mudr\u00e1k", "KDH / Ivona Vicianov\u00e1": "KDH / Ivona Vicianov\u00e1", "KDH / Pavol Noga": "KDH / Pavol Noga", "KDH / J\u00e1n Pa\u013eov\u010d\u00edk": "KDH / J\u00e1n Pa\u013eov\u010d\u00edk", "KDH / Peter Barbas": "KDH / Peter Barbas", "KDH / Franti\u0161ek Kmec\u00edk": "KDH / Franti\u0161ek Kmec\u00edk", "KDH / Miroslav Papay": "KDH / Miroslav Papay", "KDH / Pavol Mi\u010duda": "KDH / Pavol Mi\u010duda", "KDH / Monika V\u00e9ghov\u00e1": "KDH / Monika V\u00e9ghov\u00e1", "KDH / Slavom\u00edr Majer\u010d\u00e1k": "KDH / Slavom\u00edr Majer\u010d\u00e1k", "KDH / \u013dubor Kalafus": "KDH / \u013dubor Kalafus", "KDH / Juraj \u0160imunek": "KDH / Juraj \u0160imunek", "KDH / Franti\u0161ek Pr\u00edvara": "KDH / Franti\u0161ek Pr\u00edvara", "KDH / Franti\u0161ek \u010cech": "KDH / Franti\u0161ek \u010cech", "KDH / Milan \u0160indler": "KDH / Milan \u0160indler", "KDH / M\u00e1ria Tom\u00e1\u0161ov\u00e1": "KDH / M\u00e1ria Tom\u00e1\u0161ov\u00e1", "KDH / Juraj Rosin\u010din": "KDH / Juraj Rosin\u010din", "KDH / L\u00fddia Budzi\u0148\u00e1kov\u00e1": "KDH / L\u00fddia Budzi\u0148\u00e1kov\u00e1", "KDH / Igor Barto\u0161\u00edk": "KDH / Igor Barto\u0161\u00edk", "KDH / Andrej \u010cop\u00edk": "KDH / Andrej \u010cop\u00edk", "KDH / Mari\u00e1n Eli\u00e1\u0161": "KDH / Mari\u00e1n Eli\u00e1\u0161", "KDH / M\u00e1ria Hor\u0148\u00e1kov\u00e1": "KDH / M\u00e1ria Hor\u0148\u00e1kov\u00e1", "KDH / Martin Klimek": "KDH / Martin Klimek", "KDH / R\u00f3bert Rybovi\u010d": "KDH / R\u00f3bert Rybovi\u010d", "KDH / Peter Rado\u0161insk\u00fd": "KDH / Peter Rado\u0161insk\u00fd", "KDH / Milan Neve\u010fal": "KDH / Milan Neve\u010fal", "KDH / Peter Cocher": "KDH / Peter Cocher", "KDH / J\u00e1n Moj\u017ei\u0161": "KDH / J\u00e1n Moj\u017ei\u0161", "KDH / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Hot\u00e1ry": "KDH / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Hot\u00e1ry", "KDH / Jozef Bolje\u0161ik": "KDH / Jozef Bolje\u0161ik", "KDH / Vladim\u00edr Heger": "KDH / Vladim\u00edr Heger", "KDH / \u013dubom\u00edr Le\u0161ko": "KDH / \u013dubom\u00edr Le\u0161ko", "KDH / Stanislav Jir\u00ed\u010dek": "KDH / Stanislav Jir\u00ed\u010dek", "KDH / J\u00falius Vyrostek": "KDH / J\u00falius Vyrostek", "KDH / Peter Gabura": "KDH / Peter Gabura", "KDH / Viliam Majda": "KDH / Viliam Majda", "KDH / \u0160tefan Horony": "KDH / \u0160tefan Horony", "KDH / Emanuel Noga": "KDH / Emanuel Noga", "KDH / Juraj Marko": "KDH / Juraj Marko", "KDH / Ladislav Ogur\u010d\u00e1k": "KDH / Ladislav Ogur\u010d\u00e1k", "KDH / Andrej Krab\u00e1\u010d": "KDH / Andrej Krab\u00e1\u010d", "KDH / Michal Deket": "KDH / Michal Deket", "KDH / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Kov\u00e1\u010dik": "KDH / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Kov\u00e1\u010dik", "KDH / Peter Bobula": "KDH / Peter Bobula", "SKOK! / Juraj Mi\u0161kov": "SKOK! / Juraj Mi\u0161kov", "SKOK! / Katar\u00edna Augustini\u010d": "SKOK! / Katar\u00edna Augustini\u010d", "SKOK! / Daniel Krajcer": "SKOK! / Daniel Krajcer", "SKOK! / Jozef Koll\u00e1r": "SKOK! / Jozef Koll\u00e1r", "SKOK! / Monika Dimitriadu": "SKOK! / Monika Dimitriadu", "SKOK! / Martin Chren": "SKOK! / Martin Chren", "SKOK! / J\u00e1n \u0160ub\u00e1k": "SKOK! / J\u00e1n \u0160ub\u00e1k", "SKOK! / Daniela \u0160tieberov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Daniela \u0160tieberov\u00e1", "SKOK! / \u013dubom\u00edr Par\u00edzek": "SKOK! / \u013dubom\u00edr Par\u00edzek", "SKOK! / Pavol Bal\u017eanka": "SKOK! / Pavol Bal\u017eanka", "SKOK! / Rastislav Antala": "SKOK! / Rastislav Antala", "SKOK! / J\u00e1n Gajdo\u0161": "SKOK! / J\u00e1n Gajdo\u0161", "SKOK! / Karol Achimsk\u00fd": "SKOK! / Karol Achimsk\u00fd", "SKOK! / Stanislav Michal\u00edk": "SKOK! / Stanislav Michal\u00edk", "SKOK! / Roman Remo": "SKOK! / Roman Remo", "SKOK! / Ivan Pavlov": "SKOK! / Ivan Pavlov", "SKOK! / Ferndinand V\u00edtek": "SKOK! / Ferndinand V\u00edtek", "SKOK! / Daniel Hudec": "SKOK! / Daniel Hudec", "SKOK! / \u013dubica Navr\u00e1tilov\u00e1": "SKOK! / \u013dubica Navr\u00e1tilov\u00e1", "SKOK! / Peter Bodoki": "SKOK! / Peter Bodoki", "SKOK! / Marek Nikel": "SKOK! / Marek Nikel", "SKOK! / Zolt\u00e1n R\u00f3zsa": "SKOK! / Zolt\u00e1n R\u00f3zsa", "SKOK! / Martina Fondrkov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Martina Fondrkov\u00e1", "SKOK! / Jozef M\u00f3der": "SKOK! / Jozef M\u00f3der", "SKOK! / Peter Klein": "SKOK! / Peter Klein", "SKOK! / Ladislav Mal\u00edk": "SKOK! / Ladislav Mal\u00edk", "SKOK! / \u0160tefan Moln\u00e1r": "SKOK! / \u0160tefan Moln\u00e1r", "SKOK! / Branislav \u0160vec": "SKOK! / Branislav \u0160vec", "SKOK! / Peter Mare\u010dek": "SKOK! / Peter Mare\u010dek", "SKOK! / Romana Jakabov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Romana Jakabov\u00e1", "SKOK! / Peter Ill\u00fd": "SKOK! / Peter Ill\u00fd", "SKOK! / Milan Benka": "SKOK! / Milan Benka", "SKOK! / Roman Trnka": "SKOK! / Roman Trnka", "SKOK! / Zdenka Ra\u010dayov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Zdenka Ra\u010dayov\u00e1", "SKOK! / Alica Dragulov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Alica Dragulov\u00e1", "SKOK! / Oto Koppan": "SKOK! / Oto Koppan", "SKOK! / Rastislav Kone\u010dn\u00fd": "SKOK! / Rastislav Kone\u010dn\u00fd", "SKOK! / Mikul\u00e1\u0161 P\u00e1l": "SKOK! / Mikul\u00e1\u0161 P\u00e1l", "SKOK! / Michal Markot\u00e1n": "SKOK! / Michal Markot\u00e1n", "SKOK! / Viera \u017d\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Viera \u017d\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1", "SKOK! / Pavel Bedn\u00e1rik": "SKOK! / Pavel Bedn\u00e1rik", "SKOK! / Vilibald \u017di\u017eak": "SKOK! / Vilibald \u017di\u017eak", "SKOK! / Martin Rusn\u00e1k": "SKOK! / Martin Rusn\u00e1k", "SKOK! / Michal Barto\u0161ovi\u010d": "SKOK! / Michal Barto\u0161ovi\u010d", "SKOK! / Samuel Horniak": "SKOK! / Samuel Horniak", "SKOK! / Daniel J\u00f3na": "SKOK! / Daniel J\u00f3na", "SKOK! / J\u00e1n Ku\u010dera": "SKOK! / J\u00e1n Ku\u010dera", "SKOK! / Leonard Lendvorsk\u00fd": "SKOK! / Leonard Lendvorsk\u00fd", "SKOK! / Martin Bug\u00e1r": "SKOK! / Martin Bug\u00e1r", "SKOK! / Marek Imre": "SKOK! / Marek Imre", "SKOK! / Boris Schubert": "SKOK! / Boris Schubert", "SKOK! / Vladim\u00edr Vlk": "SKOK! / Vladim\u00edr Vlk", "SKOK! / Ladislav Babu\u0161\u010d\u00e1k": "SKOK! / Ladislav Babu\u0161\u010d\u00e1k", "SKOK! / Vladim\u00edr Kaba\u0148a": "SKOK! / Vladim\u00edr Kaba\u0148a", "SKOK! / M\u00e1rio Khandl": "SKOK! / M\u00e1rio Khandl", "SKOK! / Igor Hla\u010f": "SKOK! / Igor Hla\u010f", "SKOK! / Viera Ja\u0161kov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Viera Ja\u0161kov\u00e1", "SKOK! / Peter Holec": "SKOK! / Peter Holec", "SKOK! / Peter Kraus": "SKOK! / Peter Kraus", "SKOK! / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Mor\u00e1vek": "SKOK! / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Mor\u00e1vek", "SKOK! / Norbert Dikacz": "SKOK! / Norbert Dikacz", "SKOK! / Peter Jonec": "SKOK! / Peter Jonec", "SKOK! / Eva Ga\u0161parov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Eva Ga\u0161parov\u00e1", "SKOK! / Juraj Jurkovi\u010d": "SKOK! / Juraj Jurkovi\u010d", "SKOK! / Jozef Balog": "SKOK! / Jozef Balog", "SKOK! / J\u00falia Vir\u00e1gov\u00e1": "SKOK! / J\u00falia Vir\u00e1gov\u00e1", "SKOK! / Peter Kov\u00e1\u010dik": "SKOK! / Peter Kov\u00e1\u010dik", "SKOK! / M\u00e1ria Jakubcov\u00e1": "SKOK! / M\u00e1ria Jakubcov\u00e1", "SKOK! / Zolt\u00e1n Moln\u00e1r": "SKOK! / Zolt\u00e1n Moln\u00e1r", "SKOK! / J\u00e1n Gajdo\u0161.1": "SKOK! / J\u00e1n Gajdo\u0161.1", "SKOK! / Ingrid Tribulov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Ingrid Tribulov\u00e1", "SKOK! / Adriana Valentov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Adriana Valentov\u00e1", "SKOK! / J\u00e1n \u0160tulajter": "SKOK! / J\u00e1n \u0160tulajter", "SKOK! / Miroslav Hasznos": "SKOK! / Miroslav Hasznos", "SKOK! / Pavol Kondrla": "SKOK! / Pavol Kondrla", "SKOK! / Bohuslav \u0160vanda": "SKOK! / Bohuslav \u0160vanda", "SKOK! / Rastislav Kunst": "SKOK! / Rastislav Kunst", "SKOK! / Erich Korec": "SKOK! / Erich Korec", "SKOK! / Miroslav Horniak": "SKOK! / Miroslav Horniak", "SKOK! / Eva Francov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Eva Francov\u00e1", "SKOK! / Peter \u0160i\u0161ka": "SKOK! / Peter \u0160i\u0161ka", "SKOK! / Jaroslav Melicher": "SKOK! / Jaroslav Melicher", "SKOK! / Nat\u00e1lia Konopov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Nat\u00e1lia Konopov\u00e1", "SKOK! / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Luka\u010dovsk\u00fd": "SKOK! / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Luka\u010dovsk\u00fd", "SKOK! / Sven \u0160ov\u010d\u00edk": "SKOK! / Sven \u0160ov\u010d\u00edk", "SKOK! / Roman Piala": "SKOK! / Roman Piala", "SKOK! / Denisa Demko": "SKOK! / Denisa Demko", "SKOK! / Martin Mi\u0161kov": "SKOK! / Martin Mi\u0161kov", "SKOK! / Ladislav Dugas": "SKOK! / Ladislav Dugas", "SKOK! / Monika Pl\u00e1\u0148avsk\u00e1": "SKOK! / Monika Pl\u00e1\u0148avsk\u00e1", "SKOK! / Patrik Dani\u0161": "SKOK! / Patrik Dani\u0161", "SKOK! / Peter Golian": "SKOK! / Peter Golian", "SKOK! / Radka T\u00f3th": "SKOK! / Radka T\u00f3th", "SKOK! / Veronika Abrmanov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Veronika Abrmanov\u00e1", "SKOK! / \u013dubom\u00edr Jastr\u00e1b": "SKOK! / \u013dubom\u00edr Jastr\u00e1b", "SKOK! / Jakub Leginus": "SKOK! / Jakub Leginus", "SKOK! / Lucia Mlynar\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Lucia Mlynar\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1", "SKOK! / Milan Belko": "SKOK! / Milan Belko", "SKOK! / Pavol Bielik": "SKOK! / Pavol Bielik", "SKOK! / \u013dudov\u00edt Jur\u010d\u00edk": "SKOK! / \u013dudov\u00edt Jur\u010d\u00edk", "SKOK! / Rudolf \u017dit\u0148an": "SKOK! / Rudolf \u017dit\u0148an", "SKOK! / Blanka Zanvitov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Blanka Zanvitov\u00e1", "SKOK! / Alena \u0160pa\u010dkov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Alena \u0160pa\u010dkov\u00e1", "SKOK! / Martin \u0160uhajda": "SKOK! / Martin \u0160uhajda", "SKOK! / \u0160tefan Oravec": "SKOK! / \u0160tefan Oravec", "SKOK! / Tom\u00e1\u0161 \u0160iko": "SKOK! / Tom\u00e1\u0161 \u0160iko", "SKOK! / Juraj R\u00fddzi": "SKOK! / Juraj R\u00fddzi", "SKOK! / Marianna Zuz\u010d\u00e1kov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Marianna Zuz\u010d\u00e1kov\u00e1", "SKOK! / Petra Hupianov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Petra Hupianov\u00e1", "SKOK! / \u013dubo\u0161 Poh\u00e1nka": "SKOK! / \u013dubo\u0161 Poh\u00e1nka", "SKOK! / Jakub Ilavsk\u00fd": "SKOK! / Jakub Ilavsk\u00fd", "SKOK! / Milan Bu\u010dko": "SKOK! / Milan Bu\u010dko", "SKOK! / Anton Remi\u0161": "SKOK! / Anton Remi\u0161", "SKOK! / Katar\u00edna Hranicov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Katar\u00edna Hranicov\u00e1", "SKOK! / Peter Hradsk\u00fd": "SKOK! / Peter Hradsk\u00fd", "SKOK! / Katar\u00edna Dubovsk\u00e1": "SKOK! / Katar\u00edna Dubovsk\u00e1", "SKOK! / M\u00e1ria Vr\u00e1blikov\u00e1 Jani\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1": "SKOK! / M\u00e1ria Vr\u00e1blikov\u00e1 Jani\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1", "SKOK! / J\u00e1n Rozbora": "SKOK! / J\u00e1n Rozbora", "SKOK! / R\u00f3bert Mikul\u00e1\u0161": "SKOK! / R\u00f3bert Mikul\u00e1\u0161", "SKOK! / Franti\u0161ek Jir\u00e1nek": "SKOK! / Franti\u0161ek Jir\u00e1nek", "SKOK! / \u013dubo\u0161 Vi\u010d\u00edk": "SKOK! / \u013dubo\u0161 Vi\u010d\u00edk", "SKOK! / Dominik Hulka": "SKOK! / Dominik Hulka", "SKOK! / Katar\u00edna Toma\u0161\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Katar\u00edna Toma\u0161\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1", "SKOK! / Michal Wenzl": "SKOK! / Michal Wenzl", "SKOK! / Gabriel Farkas": "SKOK! / Gabriel Farkas", "SKOK! / Ivana Stancelov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Ivana Stancelov\u00e1", "SKOK! / \u013dubo\u0161 Chmela": "SKOK! / \u013dubo\u0161 Chmela", "SKOK! / \u0160tefan Dor\u010d\u00e1k": "SKOK! / \u0160tefan Dor\u010d\u00e1k", "SKOK! / Miriama Petr\u00edkov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Miriama Petr\u00edkov\u00e1", "SKOK! / Alena Pol\u00e1kov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Alena Pol\u00e1kov\u00e1", "SKOK! / Du\u0161an \u0160trb\u00e1\u0148": "SKOK! / Du\u0161an \u0160trb\u00e1\u0148", "SKOK! / J\u00falia Kostoln\u00e1": "SKOK! / J\u00falia Kostoln\u00e1", "SKOK! / R\u00f3bert Ondria\u0161": "SKOK! / R\u00f3bert Ondria\u0161", "SKOK! / J\u00e1n Ba\u0161n\u00e1r": "SKOK! / J\u00e1n Ba\u0161n\u00e1r", "SKOK! / \u013dubom\u00edr \u0160im\u00e1\u0161ek": "SKOK! / \u013dubom\u00edr \u0160im\u00e1\u0161ek", "SKOK! / Igor Chacha\u013e\u00e1k": "SKOK! / Igor Chacha\u013e\u00e1k", "SKOK! / Michal Mur\u00e1nsky": "SKOK! / Michal Mur\u00e1nsky", "SKOK! / Miroslav Studeni\u010d": "SKOK! / Miroslav Studeni\u010d", "SKOK! / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Benkovi\u010d": "SKOK! / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Benkovi\u010d", "SKOK! / Filip Libu\u0161a": "SKOK! / Filip Libu\u0161a", "SKOK! / Franti\u0161ek Vl\u010dek": "SKOK! / Franti\u0161ek Vl\u010dek", "SKOK! / Emil Hurta": "SKOK! / Emil Hurta", "SKOK! / Radovan \u010cechovi\u010d": "SKOK! / Radovan \u010cechovi\u010d", "SKOK! / Matej Vl\u010dek": "SKOK! / Matej Vl\u010dek", "SKOK! / Ivan Cifrani\u010d": "SKOK! / Ivan Cifrani\u010d", "SKOK! / Radovan Ma\u010duga": "SKOK! / Radovan Ma\u010duga", "SKOK! / Vladim\u00edr Palen\u010d\u00e1r": "SKOK! / Vladim\u00edr Palen\u010d\u00e1r", "SKOK! / Jozef Spodniak": "SKOK! / Jozef Spodniak", "SKOK! / Dominika Kiral Vargov\u00e1": "SKOK! / Dominika Kiral Vargov\u00e1", "SKOK! / Marian Hur\u00edk": "SKOK! / Marian Hur\u00edk", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Marian Kotleba": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Marian Kotleba", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Martin Belusk\u00fd": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Martin Belusk\u00fd", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Rastislav Schlos\u00e1r": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Rastislav Schlos\u00e1r", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Juraj Koles\u00e1r": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Juraj Koles\u00e1r", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Nat\u00e1lia Grausov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Nat\u00e1lia Grausov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Milan Uhr\u00edk": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Milan Uhr\u00edk", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Ondrej Binder": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Ondrej Binder", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Stanislav Drobn\u00fd": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Stanislav Drobn\u00fd", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Andrej Medveck\u00fd": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Andrej Medveck\u00fd", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / J\u00e1n Kecsk\u00e9s": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / J\u00e1n Kecsk\u00e9s", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Stanislav Miz\u00edk": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Stanislav Miz\u00edk", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Peter Krupa": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Peter Krupa", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jana Neh\u00e9zov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jana Neh\u00e9zov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Milan Mazurek": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Milan Mazurek", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / J\u00e1n Mora": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / J\u00e1n Mora", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Mari\u00e1n Chmel\u00e1r": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Mari\u00e1n Chmel\u00e1r", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Milan \u0160p\u00e1nik": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Milan \u0160p\u00e1nik", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Rastislav Smolka": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Rastislav Smolka", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Vladim\u00edr Zeman": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Vladim\u00edr Zeman", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jozef Mihal\u010din": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jozef Mihal\u010din", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / \u0160tefan Szaniszl\u00f3": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / \u0160tefan Szaniszl\u00f3", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / M\u00e1rio \u0160u\u0161ek": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / M\u00e1rio \u0160u\u0161ek", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Martin Feran\u010d\u00edk": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Martin Feran\u010d\u00edk", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Peter Kiss": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Peter Kiss", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / J\u00e1n Cuper": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / J\u00e1n Cuper", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Rastislav Kysel": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Rastislav Kysel", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Lenka \u010carn\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Lenka \u010carn\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / \u0160tefan Surm\u00e1nek": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / \u0160tefan Surm\u00e1nek", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Richard Toku\u0161ev": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Richard Toku\u0161ev", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Peter Kuli\u010d": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Peter Kuli\u010d", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Vojtech Papp": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Vojtech Papp", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Marek \u010eur\u00e1n": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Marek \u010eur\u00e1n", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Martin Kotleba": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Martin Kotleba", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jaroslav Kacian": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jaroslav Kacian", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Franti\u0161ek Drozd": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Franti\u0161ek Drozd", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / \u0160tefan Hud\u00e1k": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / \u0160tefan Hud\u00e1k", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / J\u00e1n P\u0148a\u010dek": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / J\u00e1n P\u0148a\u010dek", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Anton \u010culen": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Anton \u010culen", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Miroslav Ram\u0161ak": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Miroslav Ram\u0161ak", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Radovan Hr\u00e1dek": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Radovan Hr\u00e1dek", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Karol Polansky": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Karol Polansky", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Martin Baltes": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Martin Baltes", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Mari\u00e1n Lacena": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Mari\u00e1n Lacena", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Rastislav Rogel": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Rastislav Rogel", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Milan Kr\u0161iak": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Milan Kr\u0161iak", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Anton \u010cekan": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Anton \u010cekan", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Eva Zelenayov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Eva Zelenayov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Miroslav \u0160u\u0148al": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Miroslav \u0160u\u0148al", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Peter Ka\u0161arik": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Peter Ka\u0161arik", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Stanislav Lakata": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Stanislav Lakata", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Juraj O\u0161\u010denda": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Juraj O\u0161\u010denda", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Du\u0161an Cibula": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Du\u0161an Cibula", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Radoslav Luka": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Radoslav Luka", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Ludmila Rendekov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Ludmila Rendekov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Bla\u017eena I\u0161tokov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Bla\u017eena I\u0161tokov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / J\u00e1n Ondu\u0161": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / J\u00e1n Ondu\u0161", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Pavol Drobn\u00fd": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Pavol Drobn\u00fd", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Martin \u017d\u00e1\u010dik": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Martin \u017d\u00e1\u010dik", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Tibor R\u00fag\u00f3": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Tibor R\u00fag\u00f3", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Stanislav \u0160urik": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Stanislav \u0160urik", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Adriana Zavadinkov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Adriana Zavadinkov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Marek Dubai": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Marek Dubai", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Boris K\u00e1bele": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Boris K\u00e1bele", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Monika P\u0148a\u010dekov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Monika P\u0148a\u010dekov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Marek Kotleba": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Marek Kotleba", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Ladislav Nagy": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Ladislav Nagy", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Martina Kme\u0165ov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Martina Kme\u0165ov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Franti\u0161ek D\u017euppa": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Franti\u0161ek D\u017euppa", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / \u0160tefan Jur\u00edk": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / \u0160tefan Jur\u00edk", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Monika Se\u010dk\u00e1rov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Monika Se\u010dk\u00e1rov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / J\u00falius Stanko": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / J\u00falius Stanko", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Stanislav Kandera": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Stanislav Kandera", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Juraj Brandajsk\u00fd": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Juraj Brandajsk\u00fd", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Bla\u017eena Posp\u00ed\u0161ilov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Bla\u017eena Posp\u00ed\u0161ilov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Andrea Brehov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Andrea Brehov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Michaela Kru\u017elicov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Michaela Kru\u017elicov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Stanislav Susa": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Stanislav Susa", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / J\u00e1n Gancar\u010d\u00edk": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / J\u00e1n Gancar\u010d\u00edk", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Erik Fur\u00e1k": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Erik Fur\u00e1k", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Michal Gy\u00f6rgy\u00edk": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Michal Gy\u00f6rgy\u00edk", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Kazim\u00edr Sabado\u0161": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Kazim\u00edr Sabado\u0161", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Zdenko \u013daud\u00e1r": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Zdenko \u013daud\u00e1r", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Ivan O\u010den\u00e1\u0161": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Ivan O\u010den\u00e1\u0161", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Peter Kupka": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Peter Kupka", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Zuzana Garelov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Zuzana Garelov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Marcel Urban": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Marcel Urban", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Mari\u00e1n Mi\u0161\u00fan": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Mari\u00e1n Mi\u0161\u00fan", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Mari\u00e1n Mag\u00e1t": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Mari\u00e1n Mag\u00e1t", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Michal Buchta": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Michal Buchta", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jozef Ko\u0148a": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jozef Ko\u0148a", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Miroslav Potan\u010dok": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Miroslav Potan\u010dok", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Ivan Pavlisko": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Ivan Pavlisko", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Peter Hamala": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Peter Hamala", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Marek Hlavat\u00fd": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Marek Hlavat\u00fd", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Roland \u0160turman": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Roland \u0160turman", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Rastislav \u010cech": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Rastislav \u010cech", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Ivan Bokor": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Ivan Bokor", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Nina Uher\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Nina Uher\u010d\u00edkov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jozef Mravec": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jozef Mravec", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Anton Holka": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Anton Holka", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Peter Kla\u010dan": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Peter Kla\u010dan", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jarmila Berry Tocikov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jarmila Berry Tocikov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jozef Macurik": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jozef Macurik", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Viliam Brandis": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Viliam Brandis", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Franti\u0161ek Lipka": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Franti\u0161ek Lipka", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Ren\u00e1ta Hartling Oravcov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Ren\u00e1ta Hartling Oravcov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / J\u00e1n T\u00f3th": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / J\u00e1n T\u00f3th", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Mat\u00fa\u0161 Svin\u010d\u00e1k": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Mat\u00fa\u0161 Svin\u010d\u00e1k", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jana Piokov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jana Piokov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Zuzana Ka\u0161iarov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Zuzana Ka\u0161iarov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Peter Demjan": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Peter Demjan", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Branislav Du\u0161a": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Branislav Du\u0161a", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Monika Hrabovsk\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Monika Hrabovsk\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Peter Tonko": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Peter Tonko", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Vladim\u00edra \u0160midtov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Vladim\u00edra \u0160midtov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Peter Meda": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Peter Meda", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Gabriel Ko\u010d\u00edk": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Gabriel Ko\u010d\u00edk", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Monika Mard\u017eejov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Monika Mard\u017eejov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jozef Michalko": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jozef Michalko", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Em\u00edlia Frolov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Em\u00edlia Frolov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / J\u00e1n Kubo\u0161": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / J\u00e1n Kubo\u0161", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Marek \u0160imko": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Marek \u0160imko", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Andrej Salnick\u00fd": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Andrej Salnick\u00fd", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jana Drobn\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jana Drobn\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Roman Blan\u00e1r": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Roman Blan\u00e1r", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Du\u0161an Rajtek": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Du\u0161an Rajtek", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Vladim\u00edr \u0160i\u0161ovsk\u00fd": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Vladim\u00edr \u0160i\u0161ovsk\u00fd", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Martin Celleng": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Martin Celleng", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jozef\u00edna Schlos\u00e1rov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jozef\u00edna Schlos\u00e1rov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Miroslav \u0160imek": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Miroslav \u0160imek", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Vladim\u00edr Kute\u0161": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Vladim\u00edr Kute\u0161", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Martina Kov\u00e1\u010dikov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Martina Kov\u00e1\u010dikov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Vanda \u010cemanov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Vanda \u010cemanov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Stanislav Handzu\u0161": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Stanislav Handzu\u0161", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Michal Mikita": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Michal Mikita", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jana Drengubiakov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jana Drengubiakov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Karol Mu\u017e\u00edk": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Karol Mu\u017e\u00edk", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Roman Krivo\u0161\u00edk": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Roman Krivo\u0161\u00edk", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / J\u00e1n Balu\u0161\u00edk": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / J\u00e1n Balu\u0161\u00edk", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Al\u017ebeta Dovcov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Al\u017ebeta Dovcov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Stanislav Kor\u010dinsk\u00fd": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Stanislav Kor\u010dinsk\u00fd", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Lofaj": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Lofaj", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Katar\u00edna \u0160intalov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Katar\u00edna \u0160intalov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Vladim\u00edr He\u010dko": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Vladim\u00edr He\u010dko", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Zuzana Letkov\u00e1": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Zuzana Letkov\u00e1", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Peter \u010eurica": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Peter \u010eurica", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Marek Bel\u00e1k": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Marek Bel\u00e1k", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jozef Miku\u0161": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Jozef Miku\u0161", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Ivan Katrinec": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Ivan Katrinec", "#SIE\u0164 / Radoslav Proch\u00e1zka": "#SIE\u0164 / Radoslav Proch\u00e1zka", "#SIE\u0164 / Katar\u00edna Mach\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / Katar\u00edna Mach\u00e1\u010dkov\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / Andrej Hrn\u010diar": "#SIE\u0164 / Andrej Hrn\u010diar", "#SIE\u0164 / Miroslav Beblav\u00fd": "#SIE\u0164 / Miroslav Beblav\u00fd", "#SIE\u0164 / Katar\u00edna Cs\u00e9falvayov\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / Katar\u00edna Cs\u00e9falvayov\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / Eduard Adam\u010d\u00edk": "#SIE\u0164 / Eduard Adam\u010d\u00edk", "#SIE\u0164 / Simona Petr\u00edk": "#SIE\u0164 / Simona Petr\u00edk", "#SIE\u0164 / Igor Janckul\u00edk": "#SIE\u0164 / Igor Janckul\u00edk", "#SIE\u0164 / Alena Ba\u0161istov\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / Alena Ba\u0161istov\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / Zuzana Zimenov\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / Zuzana Zimenov\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / Vladim\u00edr Bil\u010d\u00edk": "#SIE\u0164 / Vladim\u00edr Bil\u010d\u00edk", "#SIE\u0164 / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Stoklasa": "#SIE\u0164 / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Stoklasa", "#SIE\u0164 / Martin Kapitul\u00edk": "#SIE\u0164 / Martin Kapitul\u00edk", "#SIE\u0164 / Martin Fedor": "#SIE\u0164 / Martin Fedor", "#SIE\u0164 / Jozef Konkoly": "#SIE\u0164 / Jozef Konkoly", "#SIE\u0164 / Martin \u010euri\u0161in": "#SIE\u0164 / Martin \u010euri\u0161in", "#SIE\u0164 / Lucia Cop\u00e1kov\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / Lucia Cop\u00e1kov\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / R\u00f3bert Auxt": "#SIE\u0164 / R\u00f3bert Auxt", "#SIE\u0164 / Jozef Kamenick\u00fd": "#SIE\u0164 / Jozef Kamenick\u00fd", "#SIE\u0164 / J\u00falia \u010curillov\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / J\u00falia \u010curillov\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / \u013dubom\u00edr Kubla": "#SIE\u0164 / \u013dubom\u00edr Kubla", "#SIE\u0164 / Juraj Kur\u0148avka": "#SIE\u0164 / Juraj Kur\u0148avka", "#SIE\u0164 / Roman Jaro\u0161": "#SIE\u0164 / Roman Jaro\u0161", "#SIE\u0164 / J\u00e1n Kr\u00e1lik": "#SIE\u0164 / J\u00e1n Kr\u00e1lik", "#SIE\u0164 / Franti\u0161ek G\u0151gh": "#SIE\u0164 / Franti\u0161ek G\u0151gh", "#SIE\u0164 / Maro\u0161 Sagan": "#SIE\u0164 / Maro\u0161 Sagan", "#SIE\u0164 / Roman Brecely": "#SIE\u0164 / Roman Brecely", "#SIE\u0164 / Ivan Ron\u010d\u00e1k": "#SIE\u0164 / Ivan Ron\u010d\u00e1k", "#SIE\u0164 / Ladislav Luk\u00e1\u010d": "#SIE\u0164 / Ladislav Luk\u00e1\u010d", "#SIE\u0164 / Ren\u00e1ta Popundov\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / Ren\u00e1ta Popundov\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / J\u00e1n Mrva": "#SIE\u0164 / J\u00e1n Mrva", "#SIE\u0164 / Radoslav Dlugo\u0161": "#SIE\u0164 / Radoslav Dlugo\u0161", "#SIE\u0164 / Adri\u00e1n Gu\u017eo": "#SIE\u0164 / Adri\u00e1n Gu\u017eo", "#SIE\u0164 / Miroslav \u0160pak": "#SIE\u0164 / Miroslav \u0160pak", "#SIE\u0164 / J\u00e1n Pr\u00edlepok": "#SIE\u0164 / J\u00e1n Pr\u00edlepok", "#SIE\u0164 / Miroslava Zajcevov\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / Miroslava Zajcevov\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / Lubo\u0161 K\u00fcrthy": "#SIE\u0164 / Lubo\u0161 K\u00fcrthy", "#SIE\u0164 / \u013dubom\u00edr Kocourek": "#SIE\u0164 / \u013dubom\u00edr Kocourek", "#SIE\u0164 / Pavel Greksa": "#SIE\u0164 / Pavel Greksa", "#SIE\u0164 / \u013dudmila Chodelkov\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / \u013dudmila Chodelkov\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / Ladislav L\u00f6rinc": "#SIE\u0164 / Ladislav L\u00f6rinc", "#SIE\u0164 / Dominika Tekeliov\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / Dominika Tekeliov\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / Samuel Vavr\u00edk": "#SIE\u0164 / Samuel Vavr\u00edk", "#SIE\u0164 / Igor Adamec": "#SIE\u0164 / Igor Adamec", "#SIE\u0164 / J\u00e1n Man\u00edk": "#SIE\u0164 / J\u00e1n Man\u00edk", "#SIE\u0164 / Viera Koval\u00edkov\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / Viera Koval\u00edkov\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / Martin Starzyk": "#SIE\u0164 / Martin Starzyk", "#SIE\u0164 / \u013dubom\u00edr Fiksel": "#SIE\u0164 / \u013dubom\u00edr Fiksel", "#SIE\u0164 / Jozef Kohajda": "#SIE\u0164 / Jozef Kohajda", "#SIE\u0164 / Andrej Kopt\u00e1k": "#SIE\u0164 / Andrej Kopt\u00e1k", "#SIE\u0164 / Erik Ha\u013eko": "#SIE\u0164 / Erik Ha\u013eko", "#SIE\u0164 / Marcel Ma\u0165ov\u010d\u00edk": "#SIE\u0164 / Marcel Ma\u0165ov\u010d\u00edk", "#SIE\u0164 / R\u00f3bert Pietrik": "#SIE\u0164 / R\u00f3bert Pietrik", "#SIE\u0164 / Michal Radosa": "#SIE\u0164 / Michal Radosa", "#SIE\u0164 / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Vlachovi\u010d": "#SIE\u0164 / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Vlachovi\u010d", "#SIE\u0164 / Martin \u010cervenka": "#SIE\u0164 / Martin \u010cervenka", "#SIE\u0164 / Jozef Be\u0148o": "#SIE\u0164 / Jozef Be\u0148o", "#SIE\u0164 / Ivan Plev\u00edk": "#SIE\u0164 / Ivan Plev\u00edk", "#SIE\u0164 / Marcel \u0160ulo": "#SIE\u0164 / Marcel \u0160ulo", "#SIE\u0164 / Michal Fajin": "#SIE\u0164 / Michal Fajin", "#SIE\u0164 / R\u00f3bert N\u00e1lepka": "#SIE\u0164 / R\u00f3bert N\u00e1lepka", "#SIE\u0164 / Ivan \u010cernega": "#SIE\u0164 / Ivan \u010cernega", "#SIE\u0164 / Roman Jan\u010di": "#SIE\u0164 / Roman Jan\u010di", "#SIE\u0164 / So\u0148a Szabadosov\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / So\u0148a Szabadosov\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / J\u00e1n Ohor\u010d\u00e1k": "#SIE\u0164 / J\u00e1n Ohor\u010d\u00e1k", "#SIE\u0164 / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Pa\u013eko": "#SIE\u0164 / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Pa\u013eko", "#SIE\u0164 / Marek Hova\u0148\u00e1k": "#SIE\u0164 / Marek Hova\u0148\u00e1k", "#SIE\u0164 / Roland Schaller": "#SIE\u0164 / Roland Schaller", "#SIE\u0164 / R\u00f3bert Ors\u00e1g": "#SIE\u0164 / R\u00f3bert Ors\u00e1g", "#SIE\u0164 / Jozef Juri\u0161": "#SIE\u0164 / Jozef Juri\u0161", "#SIE\u0164 / Peter Vajda": "#SIE\u0164 / Peter Vajda", "#SIE\u0164 / J\u00falius Koz\u00e1k": "#SIE\u0164 / J\u00falius Koz\u00e1k", "#SIE\u0164 / Erv\u00edn Szalma": "#SIE\u0164 / Erv\u00edn Szalma", "#SIE\u0164 / Martin \u0160orf": "#SIE\u0164 / Martin \u0160orf", "#SIE\u0164 / Pavel J\u00e1no\u0161\u00edk": "#SIE\u0164 / Pavel J\u00e1no\u0161\u00edk", "#SIE\u0164 / Miroslav Jur\u00ed\u010dek": "#SIE\u0164 / Miroslav Jur\u00ed\u010dek", "#SIE\u0164 / Martin Fer\u00e1k": "#SIE\u0164 / Martin Fer\u00e1k", "#SIE\u0164 / Ivan Hriczko": "#SIE\u0164 / Ivan Hriczko", "#SIE\u0164 / M\u00e1rio Bal\u00e1zs": "#SIE\u0164 / M\u00e1rio Bal\u00e1zs", "#SIE\u0164 / Karol Glezgo": "#SIE\u0164 / Karol Glezgo", "#SIE\u0164 / Jaroslav Ka\u0161uba": "#SIE\u0164 / Jaroslav Ka\u0161uba", "#SIE\u0164 / Vladim\u00edr Svr\u010dek": "#SIE\u0164 / Vladim\u00edr Svr\u010dek", "#SIE\u0164 / Zuzana Badov\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / Zuzana Badov\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / Ivan Uhl\u00e1r": "#SIE\u0164 / Ivan Uhl\u00e1r", "#SIE\u0164 / Jana Rubick\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / Jana Rubick\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / Simona Smo\u013e\u00e1kov\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / Simona Smo\u013e\u00e1kov\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / Patrik Magdo\u0161ko": "#SIE\u0164 / Patrik Magdo\u0161ko", "#SIE\u0164 / Martin Vojta\u0161ovi\u010d": "#SIE\u0164 / Martin Vojta\u0161ovi\u010d", "#SIE\u0164 / Veronika Gmiterko": "#SIE\u0164 / Veronika Gmiterko", "#SIE\u0164 / Martin Galgoczy": "#SIE\u0164 / Martin Galgoczy", "#SIE\u0164 / Roman Rosina": "#SIE\u0164 / Roman Rosina", "#SIE\u0164 / Oto Hodul\u00edk": "#SIE\u0164 / Oto Hodul\u00edk", "#SIE\u0164 / Tom\u00e1\u0161 M\u00e1\u013eus": "#SIE\u0164 / Tom\u00e1\u0161 M\u00e1\u013eus", "#SIE\u0164 / Miloslav Vysok\u00fd": "#SIE\u0164 / Miloslav Vysok\u00fd", "#SIE\u0164 / M\u00e1ria Ole\u0161ov\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / M\u00e1ria Ole\u0161ov\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / Milan L\u00f6rinc": "#SIE\u0164 / Milan L\u00f6rinc", "#SIE\u0164 / \u013dubo\u0161 T\u00f6r\u00f6k": "#SIE\u0164 / \u013dubo\u0161 T\u00f6r\u00f6k", "#SIE\u0164 / Juraj Valentovi\u010d": "#SIE\u0164 / Juraj Valentovi\u010d", "#SIE\u0164 / J\u00e1n Gre\u0161\u0161o": "#SIE\u0164 / J\u00e1n Gre\u0161\u0161o", "#SIE\u0164 / Ivana Uhr\u00edkov\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / Ivana Uhr\u00edkov\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / Michal Majd\u00e1k": "#SIE\u0164 / Michal Majd\u00e1k", "#SIE\u0164 / Peter Il\u010d\u00edk": "#SIE\u0164 / Peter Il\u010d\u00edk", "#SIE\u0164 / Michal Sl\u00e1dek": "#SIE\u0164 / Michal Sl\u00e1dek", "#SIE\u0164 / Peter Z\u00e1vodsk\u00fd": "#SIE\u0164 / Peter Z\u00e1vodsk\u00fd", "#SIE\u0164 / Roman Ko\u0148uch": "#SIE\u0164 / Roman Ko\u0148uch", "#SIE\u0164 / Martin Kvetko": "#SIE\u0164 / Martin Kvetko", "#SIE\u0164 / Vladim\u00edr J\u00f3ri": "#SIE\u0164 / Vladim\u00edr J\u00f3ri", "#SIE\u0164 / Jozef Benko": "#SIE\u0164 / Jozef Benko", "#SIE\u0164 / Denis C\u00e1der": "#SIE\u0164 / Denis C\u00e1der", "#SIE\u0164 / Vladim\u00edr Baran": "#SIE\u0164 / Vladim\u00edr Baran", "#SIE\u0164 / Jaroslav Pepucha": "#SIE\u0164 / Jaroslav Pepucha", "#SIE\u0164 / Tatiana Faltinov\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / Tatiana Faltinov\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / Tibor Martin\u010di\u010d": "#SIE\u0164 / Tibor Martin\u010di\u010d", "#SIE\u0164 / Martin Vician": "#SIE\u0164 / Martin Vician", "#SIE\u0164 / Miroslav Bukovan": "#SIE\u0164 / Miroslav Bukovan", "#SIE\u0164 / Barbara Pavl\u00edkov\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / Barbara Pavl\u00edkov\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / Denisa Vargov\u00e1 Luk\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / Denisa Vargov\u00e1 Luk\u00e1\u010dov\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / Miroslav Burgel": "#SIE\u0164 / Miroslav Burgel", "#SIE\u0164 / Andrej Magyar": "#SIE\u0164 / Andrej Magyar", "#SIE\u0164 / Peter Thirring": "#SIE\u0164 / Peter Thirring", "#SIE\u0164 / R\u00f3bert Kessler": "#SIE\u0164 / R\u00f3bert Kessler", "#SIE\u0164 / Miroslav Vitik\u00e1\u010d": "#SIE\u0164 / Miroslav Vitik\u00e1\u010d", "#SIE\u0164 / Mat\u00fa\u0161 Komend\u00e1t": "#SIE\u0164 / Mat\u00fa\u0161 Komend\u00e1t", "#SIE\u0164 / Pavol Hor\u00e1k": "#SIE\u0164 / Pavol Hor\u00e1k", "#SIE\u0164 / J\u00e1n Chovanec": "#SIE\u0164 / J\u00e1n Chovanec", "#SIE\u0164 / Silvia \u017de\u0148uchov\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / Silvia \u017de\u0148uchov\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / Tibor Szl\u00e1dicsek": "#SIE\u0164 / Tibor Szl\u00e1dicsek", "#SIE\u0164 / Peter Kobela": "#SIE\u0164 / Peter Kobela", "#SIE\u0164 / Ter\u00e9zia Stankov\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / Ter\u00e9zia Stankov\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / Ondrej Kubala": "#SIE\u0164 / Ondrej Kubala", "#SIE\u0164 / Martin O\u0165apka": "#SIE\u0164 / Martin O\u0165apka", "#SIE\u0164 / Milan Simu\u0161iak": "#SIE\u0164 / Milan Simu\u0161iak", "#SIE\u0164 / Michaela Porvichov\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / Michaela Porvichov\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / Tibor Pap\u0161o": "#SIE\u0164 / Tibor Pap\u0161o", "#SIE\u0164 / Erik Lajtman": "#SIE\u0164 / Erik Lajtman", "#SIE\u0164 / Tibor Farka\u0161": "#SIE\u0164 / Tibor Farka\u0161", "#SIE\u0164 / Michal Najdek": "#SIE\u0164 / Michal Najdek", "#SIE\u0164 / Jozef Toma\u0161t\u00edk": "#SIE\u0164 / Jozef Toma\u0161t\u00edk", "#SIE\u0164 / Peter Bodor": "#SIE\u0164 / Peter Bodor", "#SIE\u0164 / \u013dubo\u0161 Maxina": "#SIE\u0164 / \u013dubo\u0161 Maxina", "#SIE\u0164 / Zora \u0160kodov\u00e1": "#SIE\u0164 / Zora \u0160kodov\u00e1", "#SIE\u0164 / Roman \u0160trb\u00edk": "#SIE\u0164 / Roman \u0160trb\u00edk", "#SIE\u0164 / Miloslav Tka\u010divsk\u00fd": "#SIE\u0164 / Miloslav Tka\u010divsk\u00fd", "#SIE\u0164 / Marcel Ko\u0161ta": "#SIE\u0164 / Marcel Ko\u0161ta", "#SIE\u0164 / R\u00f3bert Ko\u010di\u0161": "#SIE\u0164 / R\u00f3bert Ko\u010di\u0161", "#SIE\u0164 / Miroslav Zub\u010dek": "#SIE\u0164 / Miroslav Zub\u010dek", "#SIE\u0164 / Michal Mo\u0161a\u0165": "#SIE\u0164 / Michal Mo\u0161a\u0165", "#SIE\u0164 / Kristi\u00e1n \u010cechm\u00e1nek": "#SIE\u0164 / Kristi\u00e1n \u010cechm\u00e1nek", "#SIE\u0164 / Martin Bar\u010d\u00edk": "#SIE\u0164 / Martin Bar\u010d\u00edk", "#SIE\u0164 / Bohdan Hrobo\u0148": "#SIE\u0164 / Bohdan Hrobo\u0148", "SMK-MKP / J\u00f3zsef Ber\u00e9nyi": "SMK-MKP / J\u00f3zsef Ber\u00e9nyi", "SMK-MKP / Gyula B\u00e1rdos": "SMK-MKP / Gyula B\u00e1rdos", "SMK-MKP / Iv\u00e1n Farkas": "SMK-MKP / Iv\u00e1n Farkas", "SMK-MKP / J\u00f3zsef Menyh\u00e1rt": "SMK-MKP / J\u00f3zsef Menyh\u00e1rt", "SMK-MKP / Istv\u00e1n Samu": "SMK-MKP / Istv\u00e1n Samu", "SMK-MKP / Kriszti\u00e1n Forr\u00f3": "SMK-MKP / Kriszti\u00e1n Forr\u00f3", "SMK-MKP / L\u00e1szl\u00f3 K\u00f6teles": "SMK-MKP / L\u00e1szl\u00f3 K\u00f6teles", "SMK-MKP / Ferenc Auxt": "SMK-MKP / Ferenc Auxt", "SMK-MKP / \u00d6rs Orosz": "SMK-MKP / \u00d6rs Orosz", "SMK-MKP / Zolt\u00e1n Cziprusz": "SMK-MKP / Zolt\u00e1n Cziprusz", "SMK-MKP / Be\u00e1ta Kiss": "SMK-MKP / Be\u00e1ta Kiss", "SMK-MKP / Zolt\u00e1n Ilko": "SMK-MKP / Zolt\u00e1n Ilko", "SMK-MKP / Gabriella N\u00e9meth": "SMK-MKP / Gabriella N\u00e9meth", "SMK-MKP / Imre Knirs": "SMK-MKP / Imre Knirs", "SMK-MKP / L\u00e1szl\u00f3 Szab\u00f3": "SMK-MKP / L\u00e1szl\u00f3 Szab\u00f3", "SMK-MKP / Attila Karaffa": "SMK-MKP / Attila Karaffa", "SMK-MKP / P\u00e9ter \u0150ry": "SMK-MKP / P\u00e9ter \u0150ry", "SMK-MKP / Ildik\u00f3 K\u0151r\u00f6siov\u00e1": "SMK-MKP / Ildik\u00f3 K\u0151r\u00f6siov\u00e1", "SMK-MKP / P\u00e1l Zachar": "SMK-MKP / P\u00e1l Zachar", "SMK-MKP / D\u00e1vid Nagy": "SMK-MKP / D\u00e1vid Nagy", "SMK-MKP / Tiham\u00e9r Gyarmati": "SMK-MKP / Tiham\u00e9r Gyarmati", "SMK-MKP / Ildik\u00f3 Bastern\u00e1kov\u00e1": "SMK-MKP / Ildik\u00f3 Bastern\u00e1kov\u00e1", "SMK-MKP / Olga Szab\u00f3": "SMK-MKP / Olga Szab\u00f3", "SMK-MKP / P\u00e9ter Cs\u00fasz": "SMK-MKP / P\u00e9ter Cs\u00fasz", "SMK-MKP / Be\u00e1ta Beke": "SMK-MKP / Be\u00e1ta Beke", "SMK-MKP / Eva Bal\u00e1zsov\u00e1": "SMK-MKP / Eva Bal\u00e1zsov\u00e1", "SMK-MKP / G\u00e1bor Mih\u00f3k": "SMK-MKP / G\u00e1bor Mih\u00f3k", "SMK-MKP / J\u00e1nos De\u00e1k": "SMK-MKP / J\u00e1nos De\u00e1k", "SMK-MKP / Zolt\u00e1n B\u00f3na": "SMK-MKP / Zolt\u00e1n B\u00f3na", "SMK-MKP / Tibor Varga": "SMK-MKP / Tibor Varga", "SMK-MKP / Jozef Filipko": "SMK-MKP / Jozef Filipko", "SMK-MKP / Tibor Beke": "SMK-MKP / Tibor Beke", "SMK-MKP / Lajos Lad\u00e1nyi": "SMK-MKP / Lajos Lad\u00e1nyi", "SMK-MKP / Csaba Orosz": "SMK-MKP / Csaba Orosz", "SMK-MKP / Ladislav Pol\u00e1k": "SMK-MKP / Ladislav Pol\u00e1k", "SMK-MKP / Istv\u00e1n Domin": "SMK-MKP / Istv\u00e1n Domin", "SMK-MKP / Val\u00e9ria Geri": "SMK-MKP / Val\u00e9ria Geri", "SMK-MKP / Gergely Ag\u00f3cs": "SMK-MKP / Gergely Ag\u00f3cs", "SMK-MKP / Peter K\u00f6p\u00f6ncei": "SMK-MKP / Peter K\u00f6p\u00f6ncei", "SMK-MKP / Juraj Nagy": "SMK-MKP / Juraj Nagy", "SMK-MKP / Csaba Furik": "SMK-MKP / Csaba Furik", "SMK-MKP / Peter Juh\u00e1sz": "SMK-MKP / Peter Juh\u00e1sz", "SMK-MKP / L\u00e1szl\u00f3 Bacs\u00f3": "SMK-MKP / L\u00e1szl\u00f3 Bacs\u00f3", "SMK-MKP / \u00c1kos Horony": "SMK-MKP / \u00c1kos Horony", "SMK-MKP / T\u00edmea B\u00f6gi": "SMK-MKP / T\u00edmea B\u00f6gi", "SMK-MKP / Norbert Becse": "SMK-MKP / Norbert Becse", "SMK-MKP / Tibor Doln\u00edk": "SMK-MKP / Tibor Doln\u00edk", "SMK-MKP / Tibor Farkas": "SMK-MKP / Tibor Farkas", "SMK-MKP / L\u00e1szl\u00f3 Fekete": "SMK-MKP / L\u00e1szl\u00f3 Fekete", "SMK-MKP / J\u00f3zsef P\u00f3csik": "SMK-MKP / J\u00f3zsef P\u00f3csik", "SMK-MKP / Ladislav Rig\u00f3": "SMK-MKP / Ladislav Rig\u00f3", "SMK-MKP / \u0160tefan Pusztai": "SMK-MKP / \u0160tefan Pusztai", "SMK-MKP / Dezs\u0151 P\u00e1lffy": "SMK-MKP / Dezs\u0151 P\u00e1lffy", "SMK-MKP / Adrianna Gergely Papp": "SMK-MKP / Adrianna Gergely Papp", "SMK-MKP / Adriana \u017dia\u010dkov\u00e1": "SMK-MKP / Adriana \u017dia\u010dkov\u00e1", "SMK-MKP / Viktor V\u00e9gs\u0151": "SMK-MKP / Viktor V\u00e9gs\u0151", "SMK-MKP / Zsuzsanna Szvor\u00e1k": "SMK-MKP / Zsuzsanna Szvor\u00e1k", "SMK-MKP / Attila Bark\u00f3": "SMK-MKP / Attila Bark\u00f3", "SMK-MKP / M\u00e1rk Czibulya": "SMK-MKP / M\u00e1rk Czibulya", "SMK-MKP / Ott\u00f3 Szab\u00f3": "SMK-MKP / Ott\u00f3 Szab\u00f3", "SMK-MKP / Ildik\u00f3 D\u00falov\u00e1": "SMK-MKP / Ildik\u00f3 D\u00falov\u00e1", "SMK-MKP / L\u00edvia Cseszk\u00f3": "SMK-MKP / L\u00edvia Cseszk\u00f3", "SMK-MKP / T\u00fcnde Neszm\u00e9ri": "SMK-MKP / T\u00fcnde Neszm\u00e9ri", "SMK-MKP / Tam\u00e1s Iv\u00e1n": "SMK-MKP / Tam\u00e1s Iv\u00e1n", "SMK-MKP / Michal Brogy\u00e1nyi": "SMK-MKP / Michal Brogy\u00e1nyi", "SMK-MKP / Zolt\u00e1n \u0160onko\u013e": "SMK-MKP / Zolt\u00e1n \u0160onko\u013e", "SMK-MKP / Oliv\u00e9r Stercel": "SMK-MKP / Oliv\u00e9r Stercel", "SMK-MKP / Anik\u00f3 Nagy": "SMK-MKP / Anik\u00f3 Nagy", "SMK-MKP / Ildik\u00f3 Bauer": "SMK-MKP / Ildik\u00f3 Bauer", "SMK-MKP / Gabriel B\u00e1rdos": "SMK-MKP / Gabriel B\u00e1rdos", "SMK-MKP / \u00c1rp\u00e1d Horv\u00e1th": "SMK-MKP / \u00c1rp\u00e1d Horv\u00e1th", "SMK-MKP / Mikl\u00f3s Viola": "SMK-MKP / Mikl\u00f3s Viola", "SMK-MKP / B\u00e9la Hajtman": "SMK-MKP / B\u00e9la Hajtman", "SMK-MKP / Zolt\u00e1n K\u00f6rnyi": "SMK-MKP / Zolt\u00e1n K\u00f6rnyi", "SMK-MKP / D\u00e9nes P\u00f3sa": "SMK-MKP / D\u00e9nes P\u00f3sa", "SMK-MKP / J\u00e1nos Marsall": "SMK-MKP / J\u00e1nos Marsall", "SMK-MKP / Zita Cseri": "SMK-MKP / Zita Cseri", "SMK-MKP / J\u00f3zsef Kopasz": "SMK-MKP / J\u00f3zsef Kopasz", "SMK-MKP / Franti\u0161ek Botka": "SMK-MKP / Franti\u0161ek Botka", "SMK-MKP / Alica Ko\u013evekov\u00e1": "SMK-MKP / Alica Ko\u013evekov\u00e1", "SMK-MKP / Zolt\u00e1n Marcink\u00f3": "SMK-MKP / Zolt\u00e1n Marcink\u00f3", "SMK-MKP / L\u00fddia Czapov\u00e1": "SMK-MKP / L\u00fddia Czapov\u00e1", "SMK-MKP / L\u00f3r\u00e1nt G\u00f6m\u00f6ry": "SMK-MKP / L\u00f3r\u00e1nt G\u00f6m\u00f6ry", "SMK-MKP / Istv\u00e1n Zacharia\u0161": "SMK-MKP / Istv\u00e1n Zacharia\u0161", "SMK-MKP / \u0160tefan Oravecz": "SMK-MKP / \u0160tefan Oravecz", "SMK-MKP / Ladislav Gujber": "SMK-MKP / Ladislav Gujber", "SMK-MKP / Ladislav Dud\u00e1s": "SMK-MKP / Ladislav Dud\u00e1s", "SMK-MKP / Alexander N\u00e9veri": "SMK-MKP / Alexander N\u00e9veri", "SMK-MKP / Marian So\u00f3ky": "SMK-MKP / Marian So\u00f3ky", "SMK-MKP / Ernest T\u00f3th": "SMK-MKP / Ernest T\u00f3th", "SMK-MKP / Lajos Csonka": "SMK-MKP / Lajos Csonka", "SMK-MKP / Roz\u00e1lia Szalay": "SMK-MKP / Roz\u00e1lia Szalay", "SMK-MKP / J\u00e1nos B\u00f3b": "SMK-MKP / J\u00e1nos B\u00f3b", "SMK-MKP / Gabriel T\u00f3th": "SMK-MKP / Gabriel T\u00f3th", "SMK-MKP / Zuzana Szamosov\u00e1": "SMK-MKP / Zuzana Szamosov\u00e1", "SMK-MKP / Katalin B\u00f3zsing": "SMK-MKP / Katalin B\u00f3zsing", "SMK-MKP / Zsuzsanna Szarka": "SMK-MKP / Zsuzsanna Szarka", "SMK-MKP / M\u00e1ria Szuper\u00e1k": "SMK-MKP / M\u00e1ria Szuper\u00e1k", "SMK-MKP / Adri\u00e1n Szaniszl\u00f3": "SMK-MKP / Adri\u00e1n Szaniszl\u00f3", "SMK-MKP / Szil\u00e1rd Somogyi": "SMK-MKP / Szil\u00e1rd Somogyi", "SMK-MKP / Norbert G\u00e1bor": "SMK-MKP / Norbert G\u00e1bor", "SMK-MKP / Kinga Faklenov\u00e1": "SMK-MKP / Kinga Faklenov\u00e1", "SMK-MKP / Ladislav Kormos": "SMK-MKP / Ladislav Kormos", "SMK-MKP / Henrieta Vargov\u00e1": "SMK-MKP / Henrieta Vargov\u00e1", "SMK-MKP / Michal Hang\u00e1csi": "SMK-MKP / Michal Hang\u00e1csi", "SMK-MKP / Anik\u00f3 Kor\u010dokov\u00e1": "SMK-MKP / Anik\u00f3 Kor\u010dokov\u00e1", "SMK-MKP / P\u00e9ter \u00d3v\u00e1ry": "SMK-MKP / P\u00e9ter \u00d3v\u00e1ry", "SMK-MKP / G\u00e1bor Veres": "SMK-MKP / G\u00e1bor Veres", "SMK-MKP / J\u00e1nos M\u00e9ry": "SMK-MKP / J\u00e1nos M\u00e9ry", "SMK-MKP / Ferenc Fekete": "SMK-MKP / Ferenc Fekete", "SMK-MKP / Gergely Finta": "SMK-MKP / Gergely Finta", "SMK-MKP / P\u00e9ter Nagy": "SMK-MKP / P\u00e9ter Nagy", "SMK-MKP / Mikul\u00e1\u0161 Csirmaz": "SMK-MKP / Mikul\u00e1\u0161 Csirmaz", "SMK-MKP / Tibor Csenger": "SMK-MKP / Tibor Csenger", "SMK-MKP / \u00c1kos Csonka": "SMK-MKP / \u00c1kos Csonka", "SMK-MKP / L\u00e1szl\u00f3 Farkas": "SMK-MKP / L\u00e1szl\u00f3 Farkas", "SMK-MKP / \u0160tefan Horv\u00e1th": "SMK-MKP / \u0160tefan Horv\u00e1th", "SMK-MKP / Ladislav Kocsis": "SMK-MKP / Ladislav Kocsis", "SMK-MKP / \u00c9va Bogn\u00e1r": "SMK-MKP / \u00c9va Bogn\u00e1r", "SMK-MKP / Zolt\u00e1n H\u00e1jos": "SMK-MKP / Zolt\u00e1n H\u00e1jos", "SMK-MKP / Zolt\u00e1n Novota": "SMK-MKP / Zolt\u00e1n Novota", "SMK-MKP / Peter Ertl": "SMK-MKP / Peter Ertl", "SMK-MKP / Mikul\u00e1\u0161 Szalai": "SMK-MKP / Mikul\u00e1\u0161 Szalai", "SMK-MKP / Tibor Dobai": "SMK-MKP / Tibor Dobai", "SMK-MKP / Zolt\u00e1n B\u00e1n": "SMK-MKP / Zolt\u00e1n B\u00e1n", "SMK-MKP / Attila Tak\u00e1cs": "SMK-MKP / Attila Tak\u00e1cs", "SMK-MKP / Eugen Wirth": "SMK-MKP / Eugen Wirth", "SMK-MKP / Vikt\u00f3ria Leco Bajz\u00e1k": "SMK-MKP / Vikt\u00f3ria Leco Bajz\u00e1k", "SMK-MKP / Pavel \u00c9leszt\u0151s": "SMK-MKP / Pavel \u00c9leszt\u0151s", "SMK-MKP / Tibor Pog\u00e1ny": "SMK-MKP / Tibor Pog\u00e1ny", "SMK-MKP / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Lakato\u0161": "SMK-MKP / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Lakato\u0161", "SMK-MKP / M\u00e1ria Czuczor": "SMK-MKP / M\u00e1ria Czuczor", "SMK-MKP / Enik\u0151 Mag Fodor": "SMK-MKP / Enik\u0151 Mag Fodor", "SMK-MKP / Tam\u00e1s Zupko": "SMK-MKP / Tam\u00e1s Zupko", "SMK-MKP / Zolt\u00e1n Oros": "SMK-MKP / Zolt\u00e1n Oros", "SMK-MKP / Michal T\u00f3th": "SMK-MKP / Michal T\u00f3th", "SMK-MKP / J\u00falius Ag\u00f3cs": "SMK-MKP / J\u00falius Ag\u00f3cs", "SMK-MKP / Magdal\u00e9na Hrb\u00e1csek": "SMK-MKP / Magdal\u00e9na Hrb\u00e1csek", "SMK-MKP / Attila Farkas": "SMK-MKP / Attila Farkas", "SMK-MKP / Juraj Guly\u00e1s": "SMK-MKP / Juraj Guly\u00e1s", "SMK-MKP / Zolt\u00e1n Urb\u00e1n": "SMK-MKP / Zolt\u00e1n Urb\u00e1n", "SMK-MKP / G\u00e9za Szimk\u00f3": "SMK-MKP / G\u00e9za Szimk\u00f3", "SMK-MKP / Ferdinand Szalay": "SMK-MKP / Ferdinand Szalay", "SMK-MKP / Attila Zsapka": "SMK-MKP / Attila Zsapka", "SMK-MKP / Imre Vadkerti": "SMK-MKP / Imre Vadkerti", "SMK-MKP / Iv\u00e1n Fenes": "SMK-MKP / Iv\u00e1n Fenes", "SMK-MKP / B\u00e9la Hrub\u00edk": "SMK-MKP / B\u00e9la Hrub\u00edk", "SMK-MKP / L\u00e1szl\u00f3 Mikl\u00f3s": "SMK-MKP / L\u00e1szl\u00f3 Mikl\u00f3s", "SMK-MKP / Edit Bauer": "SMK-MKP / Edit Bauer", "SMK-MKP / B\u00e9la Hal\u00e1sz": "SMK-MKP / B\u00e9la Hal\u00e1sz", "PD / M\u00e1ria Ritomsk\u00e1": "PD / M\u00e1ria Ritomsk\u00e1", "PD / Robert Be\u0148o": "PD / Robert Be\u0148o", "PD / Pavol Kri\u0161pinsk\u00fd": "PD / Pavol Kri\u0161pinsk\u00fd", "PD / Eva Laj\u010diakov\u00e1": "PD / Eva Laj\u010diakov\u00e1", "PD / Em\u00edlia Uhl\u00e1rikov\u00e1": "PD / Em\u00edlia Uhl\u00e1rikov\u00e1", "PD / Jozef \u0160olc": "PD / Jozef \u0160olc", "PD / Gabriel Kar\u00e1csony": "PD / Gabriel Kar\u00e1csony", "PD / Ondrej Urban": "PD / Ondrej Urban", "PD / Peter Lipt\u00e1k": "PD / Peter Lipt\u00e1k", "PD / Milan Kicka": "PD / Milan Kicka", "PD / Milan Hrtan": "PD / Milan Hrtan", "PD / Gabriela Z\u00e1vack\u00e1": "PD / Gabriela Z\u00e1vack\u00e1", "PD / Marek Bal\u00e1\u017e": "PD / Marek Bal\u00e1\u017e", "PD / Miroslav Se\u010dany": "PD / Miroslav Se\u010dany", "PD / Patrik Bujna": "PD / Patrik Bujna", "PD / Milan Tomkuliak": "PD / Milan Tomkuliak", "PD / Milan Laj\u010diak": "PD / Milan Laj\u010diak", "PD / Alena Kolumberov\u00e1": "PD / Alena Kolumberov\u00e1", "PD / Igor Jure\u010dka": "PD / Igor Jure\u010dka", "PD / Lenka Kapustov\u00e1": "PD / Lenka Kapustov\u00e1", "PD / Darina Halu\u0161kov\u00e1": "PD / Darina Halu\u0161kov\u00e1", "PD / Elena Mozolov\u00e1": "PD / Elena Mozolov\u00e1", "PD / Viliam Mokr\u00e1\u0148": "PD / Viliam Mokr\u00e1\u0148", "PD / Vladim\u00edr Lau\u0161": "PD / Vladim\u00edr Lau\u0161", "PD / Monika Pirovits": "PD / Monika Pirovits", "PD / \u013dudmila Klimkov\u00e1": "PD / \u013dudmila Klimkov\u00e1", "PD / Vladislav Cocu\u013ea": "PD / Vladislav Cocu\u013ea", "PD / Richard Lakti\u0161": "PD / Richard Lakti\u0161", "PD / Jana Lachkovi\u010dov\u00e1": "PD / Jana Lachkovi\u010dov\u00e1", "PD / Alena Laboreck\u00e1": "PD / Alena Laboreck\u00e1", "PD / Peter Sihelsk\u00fd": "PD / Peter Sihelsk\u00fd", "PD / Katar\u00edna Blahovcov\u00e1": "PD / Katar\u00edna Blahovcov\u00e1", "PD / Mari\u00e1n Funt\u00edk": "PD / Mari\u00e1n Funt\u00edk", "PD / Miroslav Za\u0165ko": "PD / Miroslav Za\u0165ko", "PD / Ivan Marko": "PD / Ivan Marko", "PD / Ren\u00e1ta Minov\u00e1": "PD / Ren\u00e1ta Minov\u00e1", "PD / Vladim\u00edr Neumann": "PD / Vladim\u00edr Neumann", "PD / Peter Britka": "PD / Peter Britka", "PD / Dagmar Kah\u00fanov\u00e1": "PD / Dagmar Kah\u00fanov\u00e1", "PD / David Sul\u00edk": "PD / David Sul\u00edk", "PD / Milan Brach\u0148\u00e1k": "PD / Milan Brach\u0148\u00e1k", "PD / Janka Mokranov\u00e1": "PD / Janka Mokranov\u00e1", "PD / Emil Za\u0165ko": "PD / Emil Za\u0165ko", "PD / Iveta Ro\u010fomov\u00e1": "PD / Iveta Ro\u010fomov\u00e1", "PD / Ru\u017eena Halaj\u010dikov\u00e1": "PD / Ru\u017eena Halaj\u010dikov\u00e1", "PD / Viktor Macanga": "PD / Viktor Macanga", "PD / Martin Roj\u010dek": "PD / Martin Roj\u010dek", "PD / Alena Pivovar\u010diov\u00e1": "PD / Alena Pivovar\u010diov\u00e1", "PD / Martin Krenick\u00fd": "PD / Martin Krenick\u00fd", "PD / Du\u0161an Zachar": "PD / Du\u0161an Zachar", "PD / Katar\u00edna Petrusov\u00e1": "PD / Katar\u00edna Petrusov\u00e1", "PD / Beata \u0160olcov\u00e1": "PD / Beata \u0160olcov\u00e1", "PD / Roman Bukov\u00fd": "PD / Roman Bukov\u00fd", "PD / Franti\u0161ek Gr\u00falik": "PD / Franti\u0161ek Gr\u00falik", "PD / Sandra Mihalecov\u00e1": "PD / Sandra Mihalecov\u00e1", "PD / Milan Hrtan.1": "PD / Milan Hrtan.1", "PD / M\u00e1ria Chorv\u00e1tov\u00e1": "PD / M\u00e1ria Chorv\u00e1tov\u00e1", "PD / Ivan Herda": "PD / Ivan Herda", "PD / Marcel Harni\u010d\u00e1r": "PD / Marcel Harni\u010d\u00e1r", "PD / Juraj Chleb\u00edk": "PD / Juraj Chleb\u00edk", "PD / Roman Z\u00e1gora": "PD / Roman Z\u00e1gora", "PD / Milan Janek": "PD / Milan Janek", "PD / Iveta \u0160teffekov\u00e1": "PD / Iveta \u0160teffekov\u00e1", "PD / Miroslav Zeman": "PD / Miroslav Zeman", "PD / Alojz Han\u010din": "PD / Alojz Han\u010din", "PD / Gabriela Czanikov\u00e1": "PD / Gabriela Czanikov\u00e1", "PD / Anton Teleki": "PD / Anton Teleki", "PD / Matilda Ma\u0161lankov\u00e1": "PD / Matilda Ma\u0161lankov\u00e1", "PD / M\u00e1ria Reptov\u00e1": "PD / M\u00e1ria Reptov\u00e1", "PD / Miroslav Gr\u00e1ner": "PD / Miroslav Gr\u00e1ner", "PD / Peter M\u00fcller": "PD / Peter M\u00fcller", "PD / \u013dubica Miku\u0161ov\u00e1": "PD / \u013dubica Miku\u0161ov\u00e1", "PD / Boris Kar\u00e1csony": "PD / Boris Kar\u00e1csony", "PD / Ter\u00e9zia Ruj\u00e1kov\u00e1": "PD / Ter\u00e9zia Ruj\u00e1kov\u00e1", "PD / J\u00falius \u0160\u00e1rk\u00f6zi": "PD / J\u00falius \u0160\u00e1rk\u00f6zi", "PD / Anna Ihnatcov\u00e1": "PD / Anna Ihnatcov\u00e1", "PD / Ivan Murza": "PD / Ivan Murza", "PD / Vlasta Zajacov\u00e1": "PD / Vlasta Zajacov\u00e1", "PD / Ivana Holenov\u00e1": "PD / Ivana Holenov\u00e1", "PD / \u013dubica Tirp\u00e1kov\u00e1": "PD / \u013dubica Tirp\u00e1kov\u00e1", "PD / Juraj Trstensk\u00fd": "PD / Juraj Trstensk\u00fd", "PD / Gabriela Olejn\u00edkov\u00e1": "PD / Gabriela Olejn\u00edkov\u00e1", "PD / Katar\u00edna Balogov\u00e1": "PD / Katar\u00edna Balogov\u00e1", "PD / Barbora Kar\u00e1csony": "PD / Barbora Kar\u00e1csony", "PD / Alena Hor\u0148\u00e1kov\u00e1": "PD / Alena Hor\u0148\u00e1kov\u00e1", "PD / J\u00e1n Bo\u0161ansk\u00fd": "PD / J\u00e1n Bo\u0161ansk\u00fd", "PD / Attila Luk\u00e1\u010d": "PD / Attila Luk\u00e1\u010d", "PD / J\u00e1n Varga": "PD / J\u00e1n Varga", "PD / Juraj Libera": "PD / Juraj Libera", "PD / Eva Barnov\u00e1": "PD / Eva Barnov\u00e1", "PD / Zuzana O\u010den\u00e1\u0161ov\u00e1": "PD / Zuzana O\u010den\u00e1\u0161ov\u00e1", "PD / Silvia Saremaslaniov\u00e1": "PD / Silvia Saremaslaniov\u00e1", "PD / Jurij Martynov": "PD / Jurij Martynov", "PD / Tom\u00e1\u0161 \u0160o\u0161ovec": "PD / Tom\u00e1\u0161 \u0160o\u0161ovec", "PD / Jaroslav La\u0161ut": "PD / Jaroslav La\u0161ut", "PD / Jozef Fur\u0165a": "PD / Jozef Fur\u0165a", "PD / Franti\u0161ek Pos": "PD / Franti\u0161ek Pos", "PD / Peter Ivan": "PD / Peter Ivan", "PD / Zsolt T\u00e1rnok": "PD / Zsolt T\u00e1rnok", "PD / Eva Cop\u00e1kov\u00e1": "PD / Eva Cop\u00e1kov\u00e1", "PD / Jana Balogov\u00e1": "PD / Jana Balogov\u00e1", "PD / Tibor R\u00e9vay": "PD / Tibor R\u00e9vay", "SaS / Richard Sul\u00edk": "SaS / Richard Sul\u00edk", "SaS / \u013dubom\u00edr Galko": "SaS / \u013dubom\u00edr Galko", "SaS / Jana Ki\u0161\u0161ov\u00e1": "SaS / Jana Ki\u0161\u0161ov\u00e1", "SaS / Jozef Mih\u00e1l": "SaS / Jozef Mih\u00e1l", "SaS / Eugen Jurzyca": "SaS / Eugen Jurzyca", "SaS / Jozef Rajt\u00e1r": "SaS / Jozef Rajt\u00e1r", "SaS / Lucia Nicholsonov\u00e1": "SaS / Lucia Nicholsonov\u00e1", "SaS / Martin Polia\u010dik": "SaS / Martin Polia\u010dik", "SaS / Karol Galek": "SaS / Karol Galek", "SaS / Martin Klus": "SaS / Martin Klus", "SaS / Alojz Bar\u00e1nik": "SaS / Alojz Bar\u00e1nik", "SaS / Nat\u00e1lia Blahov\u00e1": "SaS / Nat\u00e1lia Blahov\u00e1", "SaS / Juraj Droba": "SaS / Juraj Droba", "SaS / Renata Ka\u0161\u010d\u00e1kov\u00e1": "SaS / Renata Ka\u0161\u010d\u00e1kov\u00e1", "SaS / Peter Osusk\u00fd": "SaS / Peter Osusk\u00fd", "SaS / Miroslav Ivan": "SaS / Miroslav Ivan", "SaS / Anna Zemanov\u00e1": "SaS / Anna Zemanov\u00e1", "SaS / Branislav Gr\u00f6hling": "SaS / Branislav Gr\u00f6hling", "SaS / Milan Lauren\u010d\u00edk": "SaS / Milan Lauren\u010d\u00edk", "SaS / Ondrej Dost\u00e1l": "SaS / Ondrej Dost\u00e1l", "SaS / Vladim\u00edr Sloboda": "SaS / Vladim\u00edr Sloboda", "SaS / Jana Cig\u00e1nikov\u00e1": "SaS / Jana Cig\u00e1nikov\u00e1", "SaS / Radoslav Pavelka": "SaS / Radoslav Pavelka", "SaS / Michal Br\u00f3ska": "SaS / Michal Br\u00f3ska", "SaS / Mari\u00e1n Viskupi\u010d": "SaS / Mari\u00e1n Viskupi\u010d", "SaS / Jakub Nedoba": "SaS / Jakub Nedoba", "SaS / \u013dubo\u0161 Sam\u00e1k": "SaS / \u013dubo\u0161 Sam\u00e1k", "SaS / Stanislav Fo\u0159t": "SaS / Stanislav Fo\u0159t", "SaS / Pavol Kubi\u0161": "SaS / Pavol Kubi\u0161", "SaS / Ivan Kuhn": "SaS / Ivan Kuhn", "SaS / Miroslav \u017diak": "SaS / Miroslav \u017diak", "SaS / Vladim\u00edr Halaj": "SaS / Vladim\u00edr Halaj", "SaS / Anna Pa\u013eovov\u00e1": "SaS / Anna Pa\u013eovov\u00e1", "SaS / Iveta Posp\u00ed\u0161ilov\u00e1": "SaS / Iveta Posp\u00ed\u0161ilov\u00e1", "SaS / Andrej Buday": "SaS / Andrej Buday", "SaS / Michal Uher\u010d\u00edk": "SaS / Michal Uher\u010d\u00edk", "SaS / Juraj Blusk": "SaS / Juraj Blusk", "SaS / Jozef Pajer": "SaS / Jozef Pajer", "SaS / \u013dudov\u00edt Be\u0165ko": "SaS / \u013dudov\u00edt Be\u0165ko", "SaS / J\u00e1n Rudolf": "SaS / J\u00e1n Rudolf", "SaS / Marek Juro": "SaS / Marek Juro", "SaS / Ant\u00f3nia Mikul\u00edkov\u00e1": "SaS / Ant\u00f3nia Mikul\u00edkov\u00e1", "SaS / Monika Kozelov\u00e1": "SaS / Monika Kozelov\u00e1", "SaS / Pavol L\u00ed\u0161ka": "SaS / Pavol L\u00ed\u0161ka", "SaS / Peter Cmorej": "SaS / Peter Cmorej", "SaS / Martin \u0160u\u0161ol": "SaS / Martin \u0160u\u0161ol", "SaS / Milan Blaho": "SaS / Milan Blaho", "SaS / Jarmila Teskov\u00e1": "SaS / Jarmila Teskov\u00e1", "SaS / Peter Jur\u010do": "SaS / Peter Jur\u010do", "SaS / Ladislav Matejka": "SaS / Ladislav Matejka", "SaS / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Ranik": "SaS / Luk\u00e1\u0161 Ranik", "SaS / Juraj Jevin": "SaS / Juraj Jevin", "SaS / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Galo": "SaS / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Galo", "SaS / Boris Ka\u010d\u00e1ni": "SaS / Boris Ka\u010d\u00e1ni", "SaS / Vladim\u00edr Poruban": "SaS / Vladim\u00edr Poruban", "SaS / Alexandra Bern\u00e1thov\u00e1": "SaS / Alexandra Bern\u00e1thov\u00e1", "SaS / Zaher Mahmoud": "SaS / Zaher Mahmoud", "SaS / Zlata Holubov\u00e1": "SaS / Zlata Holubov\u00e1", "SaS / \u013dudmila Zajacov\u00e1": "SaS / \u013dudmila Zajacov\u00e1", "SaS / Polat Elalmis": "SaS / Polat Elalmis", "SaS / So\u0148a Tchirov\u00e1": "SaS / So\u0148a Tchirov\u00e1", "SaS / M\u00e1ria Urbanov\u00e1": "SaS / M\u00e1ria Urbanov\u00e1", "SaS / Roman Hud\u00edk": "SaS / Roman Hud\u00edk", "SaS / Jozef Klink": "SaS / Jozef Klink", "SaS / \u0160tefan Pecen": "SaS / \u0160tefan Pecen", "SaS / Ivan Hus\u00e1r": "SaS / Ivan Hus\u00e1r", "SaS / Marian P\u00e1le\u0161": "SaS / Marian P\u00e1le\u0161", "SaS / Ivo Nem\u010di\u010d": "SaS / Ivo Nem\u010di\u010d", "SaS / Lucia Rennerov\u00e1": "SaS / Lucia Rennerov\u00e1", "SaS / R\u00f3bert Klimo": "SaS / R\u00f3bert Klimo", "SaS / Ivan Holko": "SaS / Ivan Holko", "SaS / J\u00e1n Karman": "SaS / J\u00e1n Karman", "SaS / Ondrej Kvasnica": "SaS / Ondrej Kvasnica", "SaS / Jozef Kramec": "SaS / Jozef Kramec", "SaS / Igor Prielo\u017en\u00fd": "SaS / Igor Prielo\u017en\u00fd", "SaS / Edita Anthony": "SaS / Edita Anthony", "SaS / Teodor Dlu\u017eansk\u00fd": "SaS / Teodor Dlu\u017eansk\u00fd", "SaS / Jozef Strelinger": "SaS / Jozef Strelinger", "SaS / Peter Zika": "SaS / Peter Zika", "SaS / Rudolf Klimek": "SaS / Rudolf Klimek", "SaS / \u0160tefan Nemlaha": "SaS / \u0160tefan Nemlaha", "SaS / Juraj \u0160t\u00edt": "SaS / Juraj \u0160t\u00edt", "SaS / Michal Kov\u00e1\u010d": "SaS / Michal Kov\u00e1\u010d", "SaS / Viktor Mur\u00e1nsky": "SaS / Viktor Mur\u00e1nsky", "SaS / Peter Pacek": "SaS / Peter Pacek", "SaS / \u013dudmila \u0160imkov\u00e1 Filipovi\u010dov\u00e1": "SaS / \u013dudmila \u0160imkov\u00e1 Filipovi\u010dov\u00e1", "SaS / Mari\u00e1n Tak\u00e1cs": "SaS / Mari\u00e1n Tak\u00e1cs", "SaS / Robert \u0160un\u00edk": "SaS / Robert \u0160un\u00edk", "SaS / Vladim\u00edr Hojstri\u010d": "SaS / Vladim\u00edr Hojstri\u010d", "SaS / Zuzana Pobiecka Lodi-F\u00e9": "SaS / Zuzana Pobiecka Lodi-F\u00e9", "SaS / \u013dudov\u00edt Paulis": "SaS / \u013dudov\u00edt Paulis", "SaS / Peter Kalist": "SaS / Peter Kalist", "SaS / Franti\u0161ek Kov\u00e1\u010dik": "SaS / Franti\u0161ek Kov\u00e1\u010dik", "SaS / Marianna Ma\u0161\u00e1tov\u00e1 Haliakov\u00e1": "SaS / Marianna Ma\u0161\u00e1tov\u00e1 Haliakov\u00e1", "SaS / Andrea Andr\u00e1\u0161iov\u00e1": "SaS / Andrea Andr\u00e1\u0161iov\u00e1", "SaS / Michal Smolka": "SaS / Michal Smolka", "SaS / Selim Hikmet": "SaS / Selim Hikmet", "SaS / Drahom\u00edr Kr\u010dm\u00e1rek": "SaS / Drahom\u00edr Kr\u010dm\u00e1rek", "SaS / Richard Sklenka": "SaS / Richard Sklenka", "SaS / Peter Wachter": "SaS / Peter Wachter", "SaS / Monika Albertiov\u00e1": "SaS / Monika Albertiov\u00e1", "SaS / Martin Klementis": "SaS / Martin Klementis", "SaS / Jozef Boledovi\u010d": "SaS / Jozef Boledovi\u010d", "SaS / Roman Noga": "SaS / Roman Noga", "SaS / Peter Briestensk\u00fd": "SaS / Peter Briestensk\u00fd", "SaS / Radoslav Ru\u0161\u010d\u00e1k": "SaS / Radoslav Ru\u0161\u010d\u00e1k", "SaS / Vendel\u00edn Kriva\u010dka": "SaS / Vendel\u00edn Kriva\u010dka", "SaS / Peter Nagy": "SaS / Peter Nagy", "SaS / M\u00e1rius Nem\u010d\u00edk": "SaS / M\u00e1rius Nem\u010d\u00edk", "SaS / Peter Struha\u010dka": "SaS / Peter Struha\u010dka", "SaS / Mari\u00e1n Kundr\u00e1th": "SaS / Mari\u00e1n Kundr\u00e1th", "SaS / Juraj Lednick\u00fd": "SaS / Juraj Lednick\u00fd", "SaS / Milan L\u00f6rinc": "SaS / Milan L\u00f6rinc", "SaS / Martin Pravda": "SaS / Martin Pravda", "SaS / \u013dubom\u00edr P\u00e4toprst\u00fd": "SaS / \u013dubom\u00edr P\u00e4toprst\u00fd", "SaS / V\u00ed\u0165azoslav Kopanica": "SaS / V\u00ed\u0165azoslav Kopanica", "SaS / Vladim\u00edr \u0160karp\u00ed\u0161ek": "SaS / Vladim\u00edr \u0160karp\u00ed\u0161ek", "SaS / Jozef Kanu\u0161\u010d\u00e1k": "SaS / Jozef Kanu\u0161\u010d\u00e1k", "SaS / Milan \u0160alko": "SaS / Milan \u0160alko", "SaS / Peter Kri\u017ean": "SaS / Peter Kri\u017ean", "SaS / Peter Hradick\u00fd": "SaS / Peter Hradick\u00fd", "SaS / Du\u0161an Vajda": "SaS / Du\u0161an Vajda", "SaS / Emil S\u00fator": "SaS / Emil S\u00fator", "SaS / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Moln\u00e1r": "SaS / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Moln\u00e1r", "SaS / Milo\u0161 Domor\u00e1k": "SaS / Milo\u0161 Domor\u00e1k", "SaS / Tibor Bindas": "SaS / Tibor Bindas", "SaS / Juraj \u0160antav\u00fd": "SaS / Juraj \u0160antav\u00fd", "SaS / J\u00e1n Tvrdo\u0148": "SaS / J\u00e1n Tvrdo\u0148", "SaS / Marek Luk\u00e1\u010d": "SaS / Marek Luk\u00e1\u010d", "SaS / Martin Pilnik": "SaS / Martin Pilnik", "SaS / Vladim\u00edr Blah\u00fat": "SaS / Vladim\u00edr Blah\u00fat", "SaS / Miroslav Stanov\u010d\u00e1k": "SaS / Miroslav Stanov\u010d\u00e1k", "SaS / Vladim\u00edr Bu\u010dko": "SaS / Vladim\u00edr Bu\u010dko", "SaS / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Bilik": "SaS / Tom\u00e1\u0161 Bilik", "SaS / Peter Kol\u00e1r": "SaS / Peter Kol\u00e1r", "SaS / Daniel Kravec": "SaS / Daniel Kravec", "SaS / \u013dubica Lehotsk\u00e1": "SaS / \u013dubica Lehotsk\u00e1", "SaS / Ivan Hodo\u0161i": "SaS / Ivan Hodo\u0161i", "SaS / Martin Tlacha\u010d": "SaS / Martin Tlacha\u010d", "SaS / Michal Albert": "SaS / Michal Albert", "SaS / Ingrid \u0160ab\u00edkov\u00e1": "SaS / Ingrid \u0160ab\u00edkov\u00e1", "SaS / \u013dudov\u00edt Kraus": "SaS / \u013dudov\u00edt Kraus", "SaS / Martin Lazar\u00e1k": "SaS / Martin Lazar\u00e1k", "SaS / Andrej Ka\u017eim\u00edr": "SaS / Andrej Ka\u017eim\u00edr", "SaS / Milan Dobrovodsk\u00fd": "SaS / Milan Dobrovodsk\u00fd", "SaS / Dagmar Valovi\u010dov\u00e1": "SaS / Dagmar Valovi\u010dov\u00e1", "SaS / Marek Krupa": "SaS / Marek Krupa", "SaS / Tibor Kram\u00e1r": "SaS / Tibor Kram\u00e1r", "SaS / Karol Uv\u00e1\u010dik": "SaS / Karol Uv\u00e1\u010dik", "SaS / Branislav Bos\u00e1k": "SaS / Branislav Bos\u00e1k"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5993, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 5993, "cast_gt_registered": 5993}, "n_stations_flagged": 5993, "created_at": "2026-06-05T05:22:56.921797", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.784, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.812, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.724, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.606, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.327, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.653, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.196, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.196, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 5993}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8c8485c3b8fb42799d1ee1665b9d8a8c", "name": "Brazil 2012 \u2014 Prefeito R2 (municipal, 86K secoes)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2012, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "TSE per-secao runoffs in larger municipios.", "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "SG_UF", "sub_region_col": "NM_MUNICIPIO", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"10": "NR_VOTAVEL_10", "11": "NR_VOTAVEL_11", "12": "NR_VOTAVEL_12", "13": "NR_VOTAVEL_13", "14": "NR_VOTAVEL_14", "15": "NR_VOTAVEL_15", "20": "NR_VOTAVEL_20", "22": "NR_VOTAVEL_22", "23": "NR_VOTAVEL_23", "25": "NR_VOTAVEL_25", "28": "NR_VOTAVEL_28", "36": "NR_VOTAVEL_36", "40": "NR_VOTAVEL_40", "43": "NR_VOTAVEL_43", "45": "NR_VOTAVEL_45", "50": "NR_VOTAVEL_50", "55": "NR_VOTAVEL_55", "65": "NR_VOTAVEL_65", "95": "NR_VOTAVEL_95", "96": "NR_VOTAVEL_96"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 86183, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 86183, "cast_gt_registered": 86183}, "n_stations_flagged": 86183, "created_at": "2026-06-05T02:15:02.422938", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.975, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.92, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.871, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.777, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.975, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.994, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.255, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.064, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.629, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.629, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.493, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.493, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 86183}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "89d064c756b74259a15f091c5ee637da", "name": "Bolivia 2025 \u2014 Presidential R2 runoff (Paz v Quiroga, 35.3K)", "metadata": {"country": "Bolivia", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "OEP/TSE EG2025 runoff via datosbolivia mirror. 35,253 mesas \u00d7 2 parties. 19 Oct 2025: PDC (Rodrigo Paz) 54.9% beat LIBRE (Jorge 'Tuto' Quiroga) 45.1% \u2014 first peaceful transfer away from MAS since 2006. 85.3% turnout; valid reconciles exactly.", "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"LIBRE": "LIBRE", "PDC": "PDC"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 35253, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T02:13:01.439122", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.856, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.781, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.605, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.352, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.696, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.156, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.081, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.52, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.352, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.352, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.741, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.266, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.266, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.68, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 35253}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "37ce004512104ddabeea9aad37ae5062", "name": "Bolivia 2025 \u2014 Presidential R1 per-mesa (35.3K)", "metadata": {"country": "Bolivia", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "OEP/TSE Sistema de C\u00f3mputo EG2025 via datosbolivia/elecciones2025 GitHub mirror. 35,253 mesas \u00d7 8 parties + full ballot accounting. 17 Aug 2025: PDC (Rodrigo Paz) ~32% led, MAS-IPSP collapsed to ~3% \u2014 first non-MAS lead since 2006. Compulsory voting, 86.9% turnout. Valid reconciles exactly to party-sum.", "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AP": "AP", "APB-SUMATE": "APB-SUMATE", "FP": "FP", "LIBRE": "LIBRE", "LYP-ADN": "LYP-ADN", "MAS-IPSP": "MAS-IPSP", "PDC": "PDC", "UNIDAD": "UNIDAD"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 35253, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T02:10:56.572109", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.856, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.781, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.605, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.352, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.696, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.156, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.081, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.52, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.352, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.352, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.741, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.266, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.266, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.68, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 35253}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6cae5d35caf34adf99c028cbf635c268", "name": "Romania 2014 \u2014 European Parliament (18.7K sections)", "metadata": {"country": "Romania", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "code4romania mirror, section-level.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Cod Birou Electoral": "Cod Birou Electoral", "SIRUTA": "SIRUTA", "Nr Alegatori Liste": "Nr Alegatori Liste", "Nr Alegatori Liste Permanente": "Nr Alegatori Liste Permanente", "Nr Alegatori Liste Speciale": "Nr Alegatori Liste Speciale", "Nr Alegatori Prezentati La Urne": "Nr Alegatori Prezentati La Urne", "Nr Alegatori Prezenti La Urne Lista Permanenta": "Nr Alegatori Prezenti La Urne Lista Permanenta", "Nr Alegatori Prezenti La Urne Lista Speciala": "Nr Alegatori Prezenti La Urne Lista Speciala", "Nr Alegatori Prezenti La Urne Lista Suplimentara": "Nr Alegatori Prezenti La Urne Lista Suplimentara", "Nr Buletine Vot Primite": "Nr Buletine Vot Primite", "Nr Buletine Vot Anulate": "Nr Buletine Vot Anulate", "Nr Voturi Nule": "Nr Voturi Nule", "PARTIDUL DEMOCRAT LIBERAL": "PARTIDUL DEMOCRAT LIBERAL", "PARTIDUL MI\u015eCAREA POPULAR\u0102": "PARTIDUL MI\u015eCAREA POPULAR\u0102", "UNIUNEA DEMOCRAT\u0102 MAGHIAR\u0102 DIN ROM\u00c2NIA": "UNIUNEA DEMOCRAT\u0102 MAGHIAR\u0102 DIN ROM\u00c2NIA", "ALIAN\u0162A ELECTORAL\u0102 PSD-UNPR-PC": "ALIAN\u0162A ELECTORAL\u0102 PSD-UNPR-PC", "PARTIDUL NA\u0162IONAL LIBERAL": "PARTIDUL NA\u0162IONAL LIBERAL", "PARTIDUL ROM\u00c2NIA MARE": "PARTIDUL ROM\u00c2NIA MARE", "ALIAN\u0162A NA\u0162IONAL\u0102 A AGRICULTORILOR": "ALIAN\u0162A NA\u0162IONAL\u0102 A AGRICULTORILOR", "PARTIDUL DREPT\u0102\u0162II SOCIALE": "PARTIDUL DREPT\u0102\u0162II SOCIALE", "PARTIDUL NOUA REPUBLIC\u0102": "PARTIDUL NOUA REPUBLIC\u0102", "PARTIDUL VERDE": "PARTIDUL VERDE", "FOR\u0162A CIVIC\u0102": "FOR\u0162A CIVIC\u0102", "PARTIDUL ECOLOGIST ROM\u00c2N": "PARTIDUL ECOLOGIST ROM\u00c2N", "PARTIDUL ALTERNATIVA SOCIALIST\u0102": "PARTIDUL ALTERNATIVA SOCIALIST\u0102", "PARTIDUL NA\u0162IONAL \u0162\u0102R\u0102NESC CRE\u015eTIN DEMOCRAT": "PARTIDUL NA\u0162IONAL \u0162\u0102R\u0102NESC CRE\u015eTIN DEMOCRAT", "PARTIDUL POPORULUI - DAN DIACONESCU": "PARTIDUL POPORULUI - DAN DIACONESCU", "UNGUREANU GEORGIANA-CORINA": "UNGUREANU GEORGIANA-CORINA", "FILIP CONSTANTIN-TITIAN": "FILIP CONSTANTIN-TITIAN", "LIGA D\u0102NU\u0162": "LIGA D\u0102NU\u0162", "PUREA PAUL": "PUREA PAUL", "CAPSALI PERICLE-IULIAN": "CAPSALI PERICLE-IULIAN", "COSTEA PETER": "COSTEA PETER", "DIACONU MIRCEA": "DIACONU MIRCEA", "D\u0102EANU VALENTIN-EUGEN": "D\u0102EANU VALENTIN-EUGEN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18723, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 18723, "cast_gt_registered": 18723}, "n_stations_flagged": 18723, "created_at": "2026-06-04T22:03:28.580136", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.671, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.916, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.676, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.57, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.43, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.159, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.242, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.186, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.41, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.676, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.57, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.523, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.523, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Christian Liberal Alliance (PNL\u2013PDL)", "winner_candidate": "K. Iohannis", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "PSD\u2013UNPR\u2013PC", "margin": 8.77, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "ROU", "year": 2014, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 18723}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e2938d88a4114c798d30da678e236216", "name": "Slovenia 2014 \u2014 Dr\u017eavni Zbor (17K voli\u0161\u010da)", "metadata": {"country": "Slovenia", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "DVK-RS VsaVolisca via Wayback.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "VOLIVCEV", "cast_col": "Oddanih", "valid_col": "VELJAVNIH", "invalid_col": "Neveljavnih", "region_col": "ENOTA", "sub_region_col": "OKRAJ", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"DeSUS": "DeSUS", "DL": "DL", "ED-NS": "ED-NS", "ZL": "ZL", "LGS": "LGS", "NSi": "NSi", "PSS": "PSS", "PS": "PS", "SD": "SD", "SDS": "SDS", "SNS": "SNS", "SLS": "SLS", "SMC": "SMC", "SHS": "SHS", "VERJAMEM": "VERJAMEM", "ZAAB": "ZAAB", "ZS": "ZS"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17224, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 2050, "registered_not_positive": 13993}, "n_stations_flagged": 13994, "created_at": "2026-06-04T22:02:15.598279", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.612, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.741, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.865, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.794, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.612, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.766, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.219, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.281, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.097, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.097, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17224}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "98898209cce24e67b0f83511887d03fc", "name": "Netherlands 2021 \u2014 Tweede Kamer per-stembureau (13.8K)", "metadata": {"country": "Netherlands", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Kiesraad CSV via data.overheid.nl \u2014 37 parties \u00d7 13,814 stembureaus (full national coverage).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"50PLUS": "50PLUS", "BBB": "BBB", "BIJ1": "BIJ1", "Blanco (lijst 30)": "Blanco (lijst 30)", "CDA": "CDA", "CODE ORANJE": "CODE ORANJE", "ChristenUnie": "ChristenUnie", "D66": "D66", "DE FEESTPARTIJ (DFP)": "DE FEESTPARTIJ (DFP)", "DENK": "DENK", "De Groenen": "De Groenen", "Forum voor Democratie": "Forum voor Democratie", "GROENLINKS": "GROENLINKS", "JA21": "JA21", "JEZUS LEEFT": "JEZUS LEEFT", "JONG": "JONG", "LP (Libertaire Partij)": "LP (Libertaire Partij)", "Lijst Henk Krol": "Lijst Henk Krol", "Modern Nederland": "Modern Nederland", "NIDA": "NIDA", "NLBeter": "NLBeter", "OPRECHT": "OPRECHT", "PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)": "PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)", "Partij van de Arbeid (P.v.d.A.)": "Partij van de Arbeid (P.v.d.A.)", "Partij van de Eenheid": "Partij van de Eenheid", "Partij voor de Dieren": "Partij voor de Dieren", "Partij voor de Republiek": "Partij voor de Republiek", "Piratenpartij": "Piratenpartij", "SP (Socialistische Partij)": "SP (Socialistische Partij)", "Splinter": "Splinter", "Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij (SGP)": "Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij (SGP)", "Trots op Nederland (TROTS)": "Trots op Nederland (TROTS)", "U-Buntu Connected Front": "U-Buntu Connected Front", "VVD": "VVD", "Volt": "Volt", "Vrij en Sociaal Nederland": "Vrij en Sociaal Nederland", "Wij zijn Nederland": "Wij zijn Nederland"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13814, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 13814, "cast_gt_registered": 13789}, "n_stations_flagged": 13814, "created_at": "2026-06-04T22:01:15.665222", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.835, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.732, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.864, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.812, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.732, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.924, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.146, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.472, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.019, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.019, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 13814}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8dbed450ca51416a965b4c9d287657c6", "name": "Bulgaria 2019 \u2014 European Parliament (12.2K sekcia)", "metadata": {"country": "Bulgaria", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "CIK sections.txt + votes.txt joined per sekcia.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"party_1": "party_1", "party_2": "party_2", "party_3": "party_3", "party_4": "party_4", "party_5": "party_5", "party_6": "party_6", "party_7": "party_7", "party_8": "party_8", "party_9": "party_9", "party_10": "party_10", "party_11": "party_11", "party_12": "party_12", "party_13": "party_13", "party_14": "party_14", "party_15": "party_15", "party_16": "party_16", "party_17": "party_17", "party_18": "party_18", "party_19": "party_19", "party_20": "party_20", "party_21": "party_21", "party_22": "party_22", "party_23": "party_23", "party_24": "party_24", "party_25": "party_25", "party_26": "party_26", "party_27": "party_27", "party_28": "party_28", "party_29": "party_29", "party_30": "party_30", "party_31": "party_31", "party_32": "party_32", "party_33": "party_33", "party_34": "party_34", "party_35": "party_35", "party_36": "party_36", "party_37": "party_37", "party_38": "party_38", "party_39": "party_39", "party_40": "party_40", "party_41": "party_41", "party_42": "party_42", "party_43": "party_43", "party_44": "party_44", "party_45": "party_45", "party_46": "party_46", "party_47": "party_47", "party_48": "party_48", "party_49": "party_49", "party_50": "party_50", "party_51": "party_51", "party_52": "party_52", "party_53": "party_53", "party_54": "party_54", "party_55": "party_55", "party_56": "party_56", "party_57": "party_57", "party_58": "party_58", "party_59": "party_59", "party_60": "party_60", "party_61": "party_61", "party_62": "party_62", "party_63": "party_63", "party_64": "party_64", "party_65": "party_65", "party_66": "party_66", "party_67": "party_67", "party_68": "party_68", "party_69": "party_69", "party_70": "party_70", "party_71": "party_71", "party_72": "party_72", "party_73": "party_73", "party_74": "party_74", "party_75": "party_75", "party_76": "party_76", "party_77": "party_77", "party_78": "party_78", "party_79": "party_79", "party_80": "party_80", "party_81": "party_81", "party_82": "party_82"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12223, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 12223, "cast_gt_registered": 12223}, "n_stations_flagged": 12223, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:59:44.556025", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.606, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.609, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.506, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.606, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.577, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.025, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.413, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.508, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.627, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.609, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.561, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 12223}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e5ccf9fe2fd0453a8c6fe12a44676d6b", "name": "Netherlands 2025 \u2014 Tweede Kamer per-stembureau (10K)", "metadata": {"country": "Netherlands", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Kiesraad CSV. 27 parties \u00d7 10,085 stembureaus.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"50PLUS": "50PLUS", "BBB": "BBB", "BIJ1": "BIJ1", "Belang Van Nederland (BVNL)": "Belang Van Nederland (BVNL)", "CDA": "CDA", "ChristenUnie": "ChristenUnie", "D66": "D66", "DE LINIE": "DE LINIE", "DENK": "DENK", "ELLECT": "ELLECT", "FNP": "FNP", "Forum voor Democratie": "Forum voor Democratie", "GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)": "GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)", "JA21": "JA21", "LP (Libertaire Partij)": "LP (Libertaire Partij)", "NL PLAN": "NL PLAN", "Nieuw Sociaal Contract (NSC)": "Nieuw Sociaal Contract (NSC)", "PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)": "PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)", "Partij voor de Dieren": "Partij voor de Dieren", "Partij voor de Rechtsstaat": "Partij voor de Rechtsstaat", "Piratenpartij": "Piratenpartij", "SP (Socialistische Partij)": "SP (Socialistische Partij)", "Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij (SGP)": "Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij (SGP)", "VVD": "VVD", "Volt": "Volt", "Vrede voor Dieren": "Vrede voor Dieren", "Vrij Verbond": "Vrij Verbond"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10085, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 10085, "cast_gt_registered": 10082}, "n_stations_flagged": 10085, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:58:56.938378", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.786, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.896, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.832, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.774, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.387, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.837, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.739, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.027, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.027, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10085}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f04d9a3e24d34b899dede4cd85d82765", "name": "Netherlands 2023 \u2014 Tweede Kamer per-stembureau (10K, PVV win)", "metadata": {"country": "Netherlands", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Kiesraad CSV. 26 parties \u00d7 10,046 stembureaus. PVV's surprise victory under Wilders.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"50PLUS": "50PLUS", "BBB": "BBB", "BIJ1": "BIJ1", "BVNL / Groep Van Haga": "BVNL / Groep Van Haga", "CDA": "CDA", "ChristenUnie": "ChristenUnie", "D66": "D66", "DENK": "DENK", "Forum voor Democratie": "Forum voor Democratie", "GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)": "GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)", "JA21": "JA21", "LEF - Voor de Nieuwe Generatie": "LEF - Voor de Nieuwe Generatie", "LP (Libertaire Partij)": "LP (Libertaire Partij)", "Nederland met een PLAN": "Nederland met een PLAN", "Nieuw Sociaal Contract": "Nieuw Sociaal Contract", "PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)": "PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)", "Partij voor de Dieren": "Partij voor de Dieren", "PartijvdSport": "PartijvdSport", "Piratenpartij - De Groenen": "Piratenpartij - De Groenen", "Politieke Partij voor Basisinkomen": "Politieke Partij voor Basisinkomen", "SP (Socialistische Partij)": "SP (Socialistische Partij)", "Samen voor Nederland": "Samen voor Nederland", "Splinter": "Splinter", "Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij (SGP)": "Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij (SGP)", "VVD": "VVD", "Volt": "Volt"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10046, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 10046, "cast_gt_registered": 10042}, "n_stations_flagged": 10046, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:58:04.537556", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.826, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.917, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.847, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.791, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.826, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.568, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.642, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.791, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.019, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.019, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 10046}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d3b9ba5dfca54547aea843a1788d869d", "name": "El Salvador 2018 \u2014 Concejos Municipales per-JRV", "metadata": {"country": "El Salvador", "year": 2018, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "TSE per-JRV via Wayback.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "DEPARTAMENTO", "sub_region_col": "MUNICIPIO", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ARENA": "ARENA", "FMLN": "FMLN", "GANA": "GANA", "PCN": "PCN", "PDC": "PDC", "CD": "CD", "DS": "DS", "PSD": "PSD", "FPS": "FPS", "PSP": "PSP", "FMLN_CD_PSD": "FMLN_CD_PSD", "FMLN_CD_PSD_PSP": "FMLN_CD_PSD_PSP", "FMLN_GANA": "FMLN_GANA", "FMLN_PSP": "FMLN_PSP", "ARENA_PCN": "ARENA_PCN", "FMLN_PDC_PSD": "FMLN_PDC_PSD", "PCN_PDC": "PCN_PDC", "PDC_ARENA": "PDC_ARENA", "PDC_PCN": "PDC_PCN", "FMLN_PSD": "FMLN_PSD", "GANA_FMLN_CD": "GANA_FMLN_CD", "PDC_CD": "PDC_CD", "PDC_FMLN": "PDC_FMLN", "PSD_CD": "PSD_CD", "FMLN_CD": "FMLN_CD", "IMPUGNADOS": "IMPUGNADOS", "NULOS": "NULOS", "ABSTENCIONES": "ABSTENCIONES", "FALTANTES": "FALTANTES", "OTROS_VOTOS": "OTROS_VOTOS", "VV_MAS_OTROS": "VV_MAS_OTROS", "TOTALES": "TOTALES"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 9422, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 9422, "cast_gt_registered": 9422}, "n_stations_flagged": 9422, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:57:22.961996", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.258, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.822, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.631, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.428, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.258, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.532, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.483, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.427, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.435, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.428, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.428, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.294, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.294, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.634, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.634, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.685, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 9422}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2b775b15a9ca4a288a8e9bdae88fde63", "name": "El Salvador 2018 \u2014 Diputaciones per-JRV", "metadata": {"country": "El Salvador", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "TSE per-JRV via Wayback.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "DEPARTAMENTO", "sub_region_col": "MUNICIPIO", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ARENA": "ARENA", "FMLN": "FMLN", "GANA": "GANA", "PCN": "PCN", "PDC": "PDC", "CD": "CD", "PSD": "PSD", "FPS": "FPS", "ARENA_PCN": "ARENA_PCN", "FMLN_PSD": "FMLN_PSD", "FMLN_PSD_CD": "FMLN_PSD_CD", "FML_CD": "FML_CD", "PDC_PCN": "PDC_PCN", "NO_PARTIDARIOS": "NO_PARTIDARIOS", "VOTO_CRUZADO": "VOTO_CRUZADO", "IMPUGNADOS": "IMPUGNADOS", "NULOS": "NULOS", "ABSTENCIONES": "ABSTENCIONES", "FALTANTES": "FALTANTES", "OTROS_VOTOS": "OTROS_VOTOS", "VV_MAS_OTROS": "VV_MAS_OTROS", "TOTALES": "TOTALES"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 9413, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 9413, "registered_not_positive": 9413, "votes_gt_valid": 2780}, "n_stations_flagged": 9413, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:56:41.867774", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.258, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.822, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.631, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.428, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.258, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.532, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.483, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.427, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.435, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.428, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.428, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.294, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.294, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.634, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.634, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.685, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 9413}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0007bdec0a27494f919d9d10a55e8208", "name": "Netherlands 2023 \u2014 Provinciale Staten per-stembureau (9.2K)", "metadata": {"country": "Netherlands", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Kiesraad CSV. 48 parties \u00d7 9,177 stembureaus (Provincial council = electors of Senate).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"50PLUS": "50PLUS", "AWP voor Water, Klimaat en Natuur": "AWP voor Water, Klimaat en Natuur", "AWP voor water, klimaat en natuur": "AWP voor water, klimaat en natuur", "Alliantie": "Alliantie", "BBB": "BBB", "Belang van Nederland (BVNL)": "Belang van Nederland (BVNL)", "CDA": "CDA", "CODE ORANJE": "CODE ORANJE", "ChristenUnie": "ChristenUnie", "ChristenUnie-SGP": "ChristenUnie-SGP", "D66": "D66", "DENK": "DENK", "FNP": "FNP", "Forum voor Democratie": "Forum voor Democratie", "GOUD": "GOUD", "GROENLINKS": "GROENLINKS", "Groninger Belang": "Groninger Belang", "Hart voor Vrijheid": "Hart voor Vrijheid", "JA21": "JA21", "JEZUS LEEFT": "JEZUS LEEFT", "Krachtig Flevoland": "Krachtig Flevoland", "LOKAAL-LIMBURG": "LOKAAL-LIMBURG", "Limburgse Senioren Partij (LSP)": "Limburgse Senioren Partij (LSP)", "Lokaal Brabant": "Lokaal Brabant", "Lokale Partijen Gelderland": "Lokale Partijen Gelderland", "Namens Noord-Hollanders.": "Namens Noord-Hollanders.", "Nederland met een PLAN (S.V.P.)": "Nederland met een PLAN (S.V.P.)", "ONS Gelderland": "ONS Gelderland", "Omzien!": "Omzien!", "Onafhankelijke Politiek-NH OPNH": "Onafhankelijke Politiek-NH OPNH", "Ouderen App\u00e8l - Hart voor Brabant": "Ouderen App\u00e8l - Hart voor Brabant", "PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)": "PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)", "Partij van de Arbeid (P.v.d.A.)": "Partij van de Arbeid (P.v.d.A.)", "Partij van de Arbeid (P.v.d.A.) / GROENLINKS": "Partij van de Arbeid (P.v.d.A.) / GROENLINKS", "Partij voor Zeeland (PVZ)": "Partij voor Zeeland (PVZ)", "Partij voor de Dieren": "Partij voor de Dieren", "Partij voor het Noorden": "Partij voor het Noorden", "Piratenpartij": "Piratenpartij", "Provinciaal Belang Frysl\u00e2n": "Provinciaal Belang Frysl\u00e2n", "SP (Socialistische Partij)": "SP (Socialistische Partij)", "Samen Lokaal Twente": "Samen Lokaal Twente", "Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij (SGP)": "Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij (SGP)", "Sterk Lokaal Drenthe": "Sterk Lokaal Drenthe", "SterkLokaalFlevoland": "SterkLokaalFlevoland", "U26 GEMEENTEN": "U26 GEMEENTEN", "VVD": "VVD", "Volt": "Volt", "ZWARTE PIET IS ZWART": "ZWARTE PIET IS ZWART"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 9177, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 9168, "registered_not_positive": 9177}, "n_stations_flagged": 9177, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:56:01.062716", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.826, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.917, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.847, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.791, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.826, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.568, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.642, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.791, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.019, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.019, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 9177}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e465e6d364df4d21930027a5582afd09", "name": "Poland 2019 \u2014 Sejm per-obw\u00f3d (27.4K stations, PiS landslide)", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "PKW dane.kbw.gov.pl/dane/2019/sejmsenat/. 10 committees. PiS retained majority 235/460.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "wojewodztwo", "sub_region_col": "powiat", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"KOALICYJNY KOMITET WYBORCZY KOALICJA OBYWATELSKA PO _N IPL ZIELONI - ZPOW-601-6-19": "KOALICYJNY KOMITET WYBORCZY KOALICJA OBYWATELSKA PO _N IPL ZIELONI - ZPOW-601-6-19", "KOMITET WYBORCZY AKCJA ZAWIEDZIONYCH EMERYT\u00d3W RENCIST\u00d3W - ZPOW-601-21-19": "KOMITET WYBORCZY AKCJA ZAWIEDZIONYCH EMERYT\u00d3W RENCIST\u00d3W - ZPOW-601-21-19", "KOMITET WYBORCZY KONFEDERACJA WOLNO\u015a\u0106 I NIEPODLEG\u0141O\u015a\u0106 - ZPOW-601-5-19": "KOMITET WYBORCZY KONFEDERACJA WOLNO\u015a\u0106 I NIEPODLEG\u0141O\u015a\u0106 - ZPOW-601-5-19", "KOMITET WYBORCZY POLSKIE STRONNICTWO LUDOWE - ZPOW-601-19-19": "KOMITET WYBORCZY POLSKIE STRONNICTWO LUDOWE - ZPOW-601-19-19", "KOMITET WYBORCZY PRAWICA - ZPOW-601-20-19": "KOMITET WYBORCZY PRAWICA - ZPOW-601-20-19", "KOMITET WYBORCZY PRAWO I SPRAWIEDLIWO\u015a\u0106 - ZPOW-601-9-19": "KOMITET WYBORCZY PRAWO I SPRAWIEDLIWO\u015a\u0106 - ZPOW-601-9-19", "KOMITET WYBORCZY SKUTECZNI PIOTRA LIROYA-MARCA - ZPOW-601-17-19": "KOMITET WYBORCZY SKUTECZNI PIOTRA LIROYA-MARCA - ZPOW-601-17-19", "KOMITET WYBORCZY SOJUSZ LEWICY DEMOKRATYCZNEJ - ZPOW-601-1-19": "KOMITET WYBORCZY SOJUSZ LEWICY DEMOKRATYCZNEJ - ZPOW-601-1-19", "KOMITET WYBORCZY WYBORC\u00d3W KOALICJA BEZPARTYJNI I SAMORZ\u0104DOWCY - ZPOW-601-10-19": "KOMITET WYBORCZY WYBORC\u00d3W KOALICJA BEZPARTYJNI I SAMORZ\u0104DOWCY - ZPOW-601-10-19", "KOMITET WYBORCZY WYBORC\u00d3W MNIEJSZO\u015a\u0106 NIEMIECKA - ZPOW-601-15-19": "KOMITET WYBORCZY WYBORC\u00d3W MNIEJSZO\u015a\u0106 NIEMIECKA - ZPOW-601-15-19"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 27410, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 4125, "registered_not_positive": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 4126, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:54:10.657974", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.899, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.939, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.682, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.505, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.725, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.219, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.213, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.991, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.748, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.692, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.465, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.682, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.505, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.595, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.595, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.561, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.107, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.107, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.68, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 27410}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "8ffd473d1f2f4f26a02db584b9a1701a", "name": "El Salvador 2021 \u2014 Asamblea Legislativa per-JRV", "metadata": {"country": "El Salvador", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "TSE per-JRV via Wayback. NT = Nuevas Ideas (Bukele).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "DEPARTAMENTO", "sub_region_col": "MUNICIPIO", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"NT": "NT", "FMLN": "FMLN", "N": "N", "PDC": "PDC", "VAMOS": "VAMOS", "PCN": "PCN", "GANA": "GANA", "CD": "CD", "ARENA": "ARENA", "ARENA-DS": "ARENA-DS", "ARENA-PCN": "ARENA-PCN", "PCN-DS": "PCN-DS", "N-GANA": "N-GANA", "BONILLA": "BONILLA", "SEGOVIA": "SEGOVIA", "TOTAL_ARENA-PCN": "TOTAL_ARENA-PCN", "TOTAL_N-GANA": "TOTAL_N-GANA", "VOTO_CRUZADO": "VOTO_CRUZADO", "IMPUGNADOS": "IMPUGNADOS", "NULOS": "NULOS", "ABSTENCIONES": "ABSTENCIONES", "FALTANTES": "FALTANTES"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8452, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 8452, "cast_gt_registered": 8451, "votes_gt_valid": 2905}, "n_stations_flagged": 8452, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:51:32.239990", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.951, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.955, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.403, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.156, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.955, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.145, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.536, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.47, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.367, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.624, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.406, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.403, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.156, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.156, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.191, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.191, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.575, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.575, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.09, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.09, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.424, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8452}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cfed08afa17b49a3b991efc9c232912c", "name": "El Salvador 2021 \u2014 PARLACEN per-JRV", "metadata": {"country": "El Salvador", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "TSE per-JRV via Wayback. Parlamento Centroamericano.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "DEPARTAMENTO", "sub_region_col": "MUNICIPIO", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"FMLN": "FMLN", "N": "N", "CD": "CD", "N_CD": "N_CD", "PDC": "PDC", "PCN": "PCN", "GANA": "GANA", "ARENA": "ARENA", "TOTAL_N_CD": "TOTAL_N_CD", "VOTO_CRUZADO": "VOTO_CRUZADO", "IMPUGNADOS": "IMPUGNADOS", "NULOS": "NULOS", "ABSTENCIONES": "ABSTENCIONES", "FALTANTES": "FALTANTES"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8451, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 8451, "cast_gt_registered": 8451, "votes_gt_valid": 3628}, "n_stations_flagged": 8451, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:50:59.314864", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.951, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.955, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.403, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.156, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.955, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.145, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.536, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.47, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.367, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.624, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.406, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.403, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.156, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.156, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.191, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.191, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.575, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.575, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.09, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.09, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.424, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8451}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6bb3a6a7794f4287b97839cc48f38c7d", "name": "El Salvador 2021 \u2014 Concejos Municipales per-JRV", "metadata": {"country": "El Salvador", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "TSE per-JRV via Wayback.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "DEPARTAMENTO", "sub_region_col": "MUNICIPIO", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"NT": "NT", "DS": "DS", "FMLN": "FMLN", "N": "N", "PDC": "PDC", "VAMOS": "VAMOS", "PCN": "PCN", "GANA": "GANA", "CD": "CD", "ARENA": "ARENA", "ARENA-PCN": "ARENA-PCN", "ARENA-DS": "ARENA-DS", "GANA_PCN": "GANA_PCN", "N-CD": "N-CD", "N-CD-GANA": "N-CD-GANA", "N-GANA": "N-GANA", "N-PCN": "N-PCN", "N-PCN-GANA": "N-PCN-GANA", "PDC-CD": "PDC-CD", "TOTAL_ARENA-DS": "TOTAL_ARENA-DS", "TOTAL_ARENA-PCN": "TOTAL_ARENA-PCN", "TOTAL_GANA-PCN": "TOTAL_GANA-PCN", "TOTAL_N-CD": "TOTAL_N-CD", "TOTAL_N-CD-GANA": "TOTAL_N-CD-GANA", "TOTAL_N-GANA": "TOTAL_N-GANA", "TOTAL_N-PCN": "TOTAL_N-PCN", "TOTAL_N-PCN-GANA": "TOTAL_N-PCN-GANA", "TOTAL_PDC-CD": "TOTAL_PDC-CD", "IMPUGNADOS": "IMPUGNADOS", "NULOS": "NULOS", "ABSTENCIONES": "ABSTENCIONES", "FALTANTES": "FALTANTES"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8451, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 8451, "registered_not_positive": 8451}, "n_stations_flagged": 8451, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:50:22.307347", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.951, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.955, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.403, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.156, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.955, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.145, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.536, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.47, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.367, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.624, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.406, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.403, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.156, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.156, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.191, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.191, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.575, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.575, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.09, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.09, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.424, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 8451}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e21deec3154a48f1b5dfd9c227b31e24", "name": "Italy 2024 \u2014 European Parliament per-comune (7.9K)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Eligendo DAIT via ondata/elezioni_europee_2024 (Italy-only, excludes out-of-country). 7,896 comuni \u00d7 15 lists. FdI/Meloni won 28.8%.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region_code", "sub_region_col": "provincia", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ALLEANZA VERDI E SINISTRA": "ALLEANZA VERDI E SINISTRA", "ALTERNATIVA POPOLARE": "ALTERNATIVA POPOLARE", "AZIONE - SIAMO EUROPEI": "AZIONE - SIAMO EUROPEI", "DEMOCRAZIA SOVRANA POPOLARE": "DEMOCRAZIA SOVRANA POPOLARE", "FORZA ITALIA - NOI MODERATI - PPE": "FORZA ITALIA - NOI MODERATI - PPE", "FRATELLI D'ITALIA": "FRATELLI D'ITALIA", "LEGA SALVINI PREMIER": "LEGA SALVINI PREMIER", "LIBERTA'": "LIBERTA'", "MOVIMENTO 5 STELLE": "MOVIMENTO 5 STELLE", "PACE TERRA DIGNITA'": "PACE TERRA DIGNITA'", "PARTITO ANIMALISTA - ITALEXIT PER L'ITALIA": "PARTITO ANIMALISTA - ITALEXIT PER L'ITALIA", "PARTITO DEMOCRATICO": "PARTITO DEMOCRATICO", "RASSEMBLEMENT VALD\u00d4TAIN": "RASSEMBLEMENT VALD\u00d4TAIN", "STATI UNITI D'EUROPA": "STATI UNITI D'EUROPA", "S\u00dcDTIROLER VOLKSPARTEI (SVP)": "S\u00dcDTIROLER VOLKSPARTEI (SVP)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7896, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:49:50.293939", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.908, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.784, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.687, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.687, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.693, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.693, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.182, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.182, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 7896}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "00f081bb43e64cb2a57c8c9f8a041512", "name": "Spain 2019 \u2014 Generales Comunitat Valenciana per-mesa (6K)", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "dadesobertes.gva.es (Generalitat Valenciana). National MIR is geo-blocked from this network; Valencia regional portal is accessible. 6,043 mesas \u00d7 20 parties. PSOE 697K / PP 583K / VOX 467K / Podemos-EUPV 338K matches official CV totals.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "provincia", "sub_region_col": "municipio", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AUNACV": "AUNACV", "AVANT ADELANTE LOS VERDES": "AVANT ADELANTE LOS VERDES", "AVANT LOS VERDES": "AVANT LOS VERDES", "CONTIGO": "CONTIGO", "Cs": "Cs", "ERPV": "ERPV", "FE de las JONS": "FE de las JONS", "M\u00c9S COMPROM\u00cdS": "M\u00c9S COMPROM\u00cdS", "P-LIB": "P-LIB", "PACMA": "PACMA", "PCOE": "PCOE", "PCPE": "PCPE", "PODEMOS-EUPV": "PODEMOS-EUPV", "PP": "PP", "PSOE": "PSOE", "PUM+J": "PUM+J", "RECORTES CERO-GV": "RECORTES CERO-GV", "UIG-SOM-CUIDES": "UIG-SOM-CUIDES", "UNIDOS S\u00cd-ACPS-DEf": "UNIDOS S\u00cd-ACPS-DEf", "VOX": "VOX"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6043, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:49:22.019491", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.945, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.908, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.871, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.804, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.036, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.036, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 6043}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dc8763be38864210bd6e1b287baca711", "name": "Slovakia 2017 \u2014 PSK okrsky (5.9K)", "metadata": {"country": "Slovakia", "year": 2017, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "volby.statistics.sk Predsedovia samospr\u00e1vnych krajov.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"kod_kraja": "kod_kraja", "kraj": "kraj", "kod_obvodu": "kod_obvodu", "obvod": "obvod", "kod_okresu": "kod_okresu", "okres": "okres", "kod_obce": "kod_obce", "obec": "obec", "okrsok": "okrsok", "TIP / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania": "TIP / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania", "TIP / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %": "TIP / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania", "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %": "STRANA MODERN\u00c9HO SLOVENSKA (SMS) / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania", "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %": "OBY\u010cAJN\u00cd \u013dUDIA a nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 osobnosti (O\u013dANO - NOVA) / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania", "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %": "DS - \u013dudo Kan\u00edk / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %", "\u0160ANCA / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania": "\u0160ANCA / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania", "\u0160ANCA / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %": "\u0160ANCA / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania", "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %": "SME RODINA - Boris Koll\u00e1r / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %", "SZS / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania": "SZS / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania", "SZS / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %": "SZS / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania", "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %": "KOAL\u00cdCIA SPOLO\u010cNE ZA SLOVENSKO / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania", "MKDA-MKDSZ / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %": "MKDA-MKDSZ / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %", "VZDOR / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania": "VZDOR / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania", "VZDOR / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %": "VZDOR / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania", "MOST - H\u00cdD / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %": "MOST - H\u00cdD / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %", "SNS / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania": "SNS / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania", "SNS / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %": "SNS / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania", "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %": "Odvaha - Ve\u013ek\u00e1 n\u00e1rodn\u00e1 a prorusk\u00e1 koal\u00edcia / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %", "KSS / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania": "KSS / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania", "KSS / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %": "KSS / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %", "SDK\u00da-DS / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania": "SDK\u00da-DS / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania", "SDK\u00da-DS / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %": "SDK\u00da-DS / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %", "SMER-SD / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania": "SMER-SD / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania", "SMER-SD / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %": "SMER-SD / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %", "KDH / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania": "KDH / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania", "KDH / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %": "KDH / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %", "SKOK! / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania": "SKOK! / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania", "SKOK! / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %": "SKOK! / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania", "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %": "\u013dS Na\u0161e Slovensko / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %", "#SIE\u0164 / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania": "#SIE\u0164 / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania", "#SIE\u0164 / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %": "#SIE\u0164 / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %", "SMK-MKP / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania": "SMK-MKP / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania", "SMK-MKP / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %": "SMK-MKP / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %", "PD / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania": "PD / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania", "PD / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %": "PD / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %", "SaS / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania": "SaS / Po\u010det voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania", "SaS / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %": "SaS / Podiel voli\u010dov, ktor\u00ed vyu\u017eili pr\u00e1vo prednostn\u00e9ho hlasovania v %"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5993, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 5993, "registered_not_positive": 5993, "votes_gt_valid": 3244}, "n_stations_flagged": 5993, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:34:25.316664", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.909, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.835, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.72, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.615, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.611, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.72, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.72, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.663, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.663, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.916, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.285, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.285, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 5993}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "60d6668f3f3042c292c30fe5454f477c", "name": "Netherlands 2017 \u2014 Tweede Kamer per-stembureau (5.9K)", "metadata": {"country": "Netherlands", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Kiesraad EML OSV4 format via data.overheid.nl. 37 parties incl. VVD/PVV/CDA/D66/GL/SP/PvdA. ~64% of national turnout (some gemeentes used non-EML formats).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "cast", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "gemeente_id", "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_1_VVD": "votes_1_VVD", "votes_2_Partij_van_de_Arbeid_(P.v.d.A.)": "votes_2_Partij_van_de_Arbeid_(P.v.d.A.)", "votes_3_PVV_(Partij_voor_de_Vrijheid)": "votes_3_PVV_(Partij_voor_de_Vrijheid)", "votes_4_SP_(Socialistische_Partij)": "votes_4_SP_(Socialistische_Partij)", "votes_5_CDA": "votes_5_CDA", "votes_6_Democraten_66_(D66)": "votes_6_Democraten_66_(D66)", "votes_7_ChristenUnie": "votes_7_ChristenUnie", "votes_8_GROENLINKS": "votes_8_GROENLINKS", "votes_9_Staatkundig_Gereformeerde_Partij_(SGP)": "votes_9_Staatkundig_Gereformeerde_Partij_(SGP)", "votes_10_Partij_voor_de_Dieren": "votes_10_Partij_voor_de_Dieren", "votes_11_50PLUS": "votes_11_50PLUS", "votes_12_OndernemersPartij": "votes_12_OndernemersPartij", "votes_13_VNL_(VoorNederland)": "votes_13_VNL_(VoorNederland)", "votes_14_DENK": "votes_14_DENK", "votes_15_NIEUWE_WEGEN": "votes_15_NIEUWE_WEGEN", "votes_16_Forum_voor_Democratie": "votes_16_Forum_voor_Democratie", "votes_17_De_Burger_Beweging": "votes_17_De_Burger_Beweging", "votes_18_Vrijzinnige_Partij": "votes_18_Vrijzinnige_Partij", "votes_19_GeenPeil": "votes_19_GeenPeil", "votes_20_Piratenpartij": "votes_20_Piratenpartij", "votes_23_Libertarische_Partij_(LP)": "votes_23_Libertarische_Partij_(LP)", "votes_24_Lokaal_in_de_Kamer": "votes_24_Lokaal_in_de_Kamer", "votes_21_Artikel_1": "votes_21_Artikel_1", "votes_22_Niet_Stemmers": "votes_22_Niet_Stemmers", "votes_25_JEZUS_LEEFT": "votes_25_JEZUS_LEEFT", "votes_26_StemNL": "votes_26_StemNL", "votes_27_MenS_en_Spirit___Basisinkomen_Partij___V-R": "votes_27_MenS_en_Spirit___Basisinkomen_Partij___V-R", "votes_2_PvdA": "votes_2_PvdA", "votes_3_PVV": "votes_3_PVV", "votes_4_SP": "votes_4_SP", "votes_6_D66": "votes_6_D66", "votes_8_GroenLinks": "votes_8_GroenLinks", "votes_9_SGP": "votes_9_SGP", "votes_11_50_Plus": "votes_11_50_Plus", "votes_13_VoorNederland": "votes_13_VoorNederland", "votes_28_Vrije_Democratische_Partij": "votes_28_Vrije_Democratische_Partij", "votes_28_Vrije_Democratische_Partij_(VDP)": "votes_28_Vrije_Democratische_Partij_(VDP)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5936, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 5936, "cast_gt_registered": 5936}, "n_stations_flagged": 5936, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:33:54.654324", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.929, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.878, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.833, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.929, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.431, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.608, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.809, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.019, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.019, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 5936}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "96df7d2382174e198ab6b5c3ec2fd124", "name": "Tunisia 2011 \u2014 Constituent Assembly (4.9K polling centers)", "metadata": {"country": "Tunisia", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "First post-revolution election (Oct 2011). 95 party lists. Nahda won \u2014 established the assembly that drafted the post-revolution constitution. ISIE scrape via fwelections (Arabic data, party numbers preserved).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "eligible_voters", "cast_col": "voter_turnout", "valid_col": "correct_ballots", "invalid_col": "cancelled_ballots", "region_col": "circumscription", "sub_region_col": "delegation", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"party_041": "party_041", "party_001": "party_001", "party_042": "party_042", "party_002": "party_002", "party_043": "party_043", "party_003": "party_003", "party_044": "party_044", "party_004": "party_004", "party_045": "party_045", "party_005": "party_005", "party_046": "party_046", "party_006": "party_006", "party_047": "party_047", "party_007": "party_007", "party_048": "party_048", "party_008": "party_008", "party_049": "party_049", "party_009": "party_009", "party_050": "party_050", "party_010": "party_010", "party_051": "party_051", "party_011": "party_011", "party_052": "party_052", "party_012": "party_012", "party_053": "party_053", "party_013": "party_013", "party_054": "party_054", "party_014": "party_014", "party_055": "party_055", "party_015": "party_015", "party_056": "party_056", "party_016": "party_016", "party_057": "party_057", "party_017": "party_017", "party_058": "party_058", "party_018": "party_018", "party_059": "party_059", "party_019": "party_019", "party_060": "party_060", "party_020": "party_020", "party_061": "party_061", "party_021": "party_021", "party_062": "party_062", "party_022": "party_022", "party_063": "party_063", "party_023": "party_023", "party_064": "party_064", "party_024": "party_024", "party_065": "party_065", "party_025": "party_025", "party_066": "party_066", "party_026": "party_026", "party_067": "party_067", "party_027": "party_027", "party_068": "party_068", "party_028": "party_028", "party_069": "party_069", "party_029": "party_029", "party_070": "party_070", "party_030": "party_030", "party_071": "party_071", "party_031": "party_031", "party_072": "party_072", "party_032": "party_032", "party_073": "party_073", "party_033": "party_033", "party_074": "party_074", "party_034": "party_034", "party_075": "party_075", "party_035": "party_035", "party_076": "party_076", "party_036": "party_036", "party_077": "party_077", "party_037": "party_037", "party_078": "party_078", "party_038": "party_038", "party_079": "party_079", "party_039": "party_039", "party_040": "party_040", "party_080": "party_080", "party_081": "party_081", "party_082": "party_082", "party_083": "party_083", "party_084": "party_084", "party_085": "party_085", "party_086": "party_086", "party_087": "party_087", "party_088": "party_088", "party_089": "party_089", "party_090": "party_090", "party_091": "party_091", "party_092": "party_092", "party_093": "party_093", "party_094": "party_094", "party_095": "party_095"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4868, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 4533, "registered_not_positive": 32, "cast_gt_registered": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 4567, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:33:26.436803", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.391, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.544, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.328, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.247, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.391, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.544, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.177, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.311, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.16, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.328, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.247, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.247, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.309, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.309, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.335, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "CPR", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Against CPR", "margin": 96.15, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "TUN", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 4868}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2a1debdd600741ebad0be70eff2f3a98", "name": "Liberia 2017 \u2014 Presidential (3.7K polling-places)", "metadata": {"country": "Liberia", "year": 2017, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Heiss mirror of necliberia.org via Wayback. Weah/Boakai/Brumskine \u2014 19 candidates.", "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "county", "sub_region_col": "precinct", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Boakai": "Boakai", "Brumskine": "Brumskine", "Cooper": "Cooper", "Cummings": "Cummings", "Dweh": "Dweh", "Fahnbulleh": "Fahnbulleh", "Freeman": "Freeman", "Johnson": "Johnson", "Jones": "Jones", "Kpadeh": "Kpadeh", "Mator": "Mator", "Mcintosh": "Mcintosh", "Sandy": "Sandy", "Tuider": "Tuider", "Urey": "Urey", "Weah": "Weah", "Wento": "Wento", "Whapoe": "Whapoe", "Wiles": "Wiles"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3692, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 3692, "registered_not_positive": 3692}, "n_stations_flagged": 3692, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:33:04.553159", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.891, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.719, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.62, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.459, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.719, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.621, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.486, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.605, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.267, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.567, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.606, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.402, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.62, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.62, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.649, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3692}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "75ace3ff65ef40fa9ce945d8fbb3a1d7", "name": "Slovenia 2018 \u2014 Dr\u017eavni Zbor (3.3K voli\u0161\u010da)", "metadata": {"country": "Slovenia", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "DVK-RS Wayback. Note: only 3.3K voli\u0161\u010da \u2014 likely partial.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "VOLIVCEV", "cast_col": "Oddanih", "valid_col": "VELJAVNIH", "invalid_col": "Neveljavnih", "region_col": "ENOTA", "sub_region_col": "OKRAJ", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"ZELENI": "ZELENI", "DeSUS": "DeSUS", "DD": "DD", "GAS": "GAS", "Zsi": "Zsi", "GSN": "GSN", "ZDRU\u017dENA DESNICA": "ZDRU\u017dENA DESNICA", "LEVICA": "LEVICA", "LM\u0160": "LM\u0160", "LNBP": "LNBP", "NPS": "NPS", "NSi": "NSi", "PIRATI": "PIRATI", "ReSET": "ReSET", "SDS": "SDS", "SLS": "SLS", "SNS": "SNS", "SMC": "SMC", "SPS": "SPS", "SD": "SD", "SOLIDARNOST": "SOLIDARNOST", "SSN": "SSN", "STRANKA AB": "STRANKA AB", "ZD": "ZD", "ZDRU\u017dENA LEVICA": "ZDRU\u017dENA LEVICA"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3279, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 177, "cast_gt_registered": 179}, "n_stations_flagged": 179, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:32:45.068950", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.65, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.783, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.83, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.759, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.002, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.151, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.894, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.09, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.09, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Social Democrats (SD) (formally Independent)", "winner_candidate": "Borut Pahor", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "List of Marjan \u0160arec (LMS)", "margin": 6.18, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "SVN", "year": 2017, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3279}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "79badc4aa4984f9ea8fa711ae9905fd8", "name": "Pakistan 1993-2018 \u2014 Constituency (multi-cycle, 2.5K)", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Constituency-level 4-place breakdown across General Elections 1993-2018.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "voter_reg", "cast_col": "votes_cast", "valid_col": "validated_votes", "invalid_col": "votes_disq", "region_col": "province", "sub_region_col": "assembly", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"win_votes": "winner", "second_votes": "second_place", "third_votes": "third_place", "remainder_votes": "remainder"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2500, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 2, "cast_gt_registered": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:32:10.582668", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.98, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.493, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.395, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.25, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.98, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.495, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.493, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.104, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.526, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.159, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.869, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.435, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.25, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.25, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.134, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2500}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f538494ab2a842b6996aa6c34f551e7d", "name": "Latvia 2018 \u2014 13th Saeima per-iecirknis (1,078)", "metadata": {"country": "Latvia", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "CVK via Wayback. 1,078 polling stations \u00d7 16 lists. Saska\u0146a 167K won (19.8%), KPV LV 120K, Jaun\u0101 konservat\u012bv\u0101 115K.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "novads", "sub_region_col": "iecirknis_name", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Latvijas Krievu savien\u012bba": "Latvijas Krievu savien\u012bba", "Jaun\u0101 konservat\u012bv\u0101 partija": "Jaun\u0101 konservat\u012bv\u0101 partija", "R\u012bc\u012bbas partija": "R\u012bc\u012bbas partija", "Nacion\u0101l\u0101 apvien\u012bba \"Visu Latvijai!\"-\"T\u0113vzemei un Br\u012bv\u012bbai-LNNK": "Nacion\u0101l\u0101 apvien\u012bba \"Visu Latvijai!\"-\"T\u0113vzemei un Br\u012bv\u012bbai-LNNK", "PROGRES\u012aVIE": "PROGRES\u012aVIE", "Latvijas centrisk\u0101 partija": "Latvijas centrisk\u0101 partija", "LSDSP-KDS-GKL": "LSDSP-KDS-GKL", "No sirds Latvijai": "No sirds Latvijai", "Saska\u0146a\" soci\u0101ldemokr\u0101tisk\u0101 partija": "Saska\u0146a\" soci\u0101ldemokr\u0101tisk\u0101 partija", "Att\u012bst\u012bbai-Par!": "Att\u012bst\u012bbai-Par!", "Latvijas Re\u0123ionu Apvien\u012bba": "Latvijas Re\u0123ionu Apvien\u012bba", "Latvie\u0161u Nacion\u0101listi": "Latvie\u0161u Nacion\u0101listi", "Jaun\u0101 VIENOT\u012aBA": "Jaun\u0101 VIENOT\u012aBA", "Par Alternat\u012bvu": "Par Alternat\u012bvu", "Politisk\u0101 partija \"KPV LV": "Politisk\u0101 partija \"KPV LV", "Za\u013co un Zemnieku savien\u012bba": "Za\u013co un Zemnieku savien\u012bba"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1078, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1078, "cast_valid_mismatch": 328, "registered_not_positive": 1078}, "n_stations_flagged": 1078, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:31:57.958333", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.885, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.932, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.832, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.745, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.938, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.519, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.386, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.729, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.129, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.129, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1078}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "17477b7b0ae746d8823523c32744531b", "name": "Latvia 2022 \u2014 14th Saeima per-iecirknis (1,055)", "metadata": {"country": "Latvia", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "CVK data.gov.lv (host network-blocked; recovered via Wayback Apr-2025 snapshot). 1,055 polling stations \u00d7 19 party lists. Jaun\u0101 VIENOT\u012aBA 173K won (Kari\u0146\u0161). ZZS 114K. NEW country.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "novads", "sub_region_col": "iecirknis_name", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Jaun\u0101 VIENOT\u012aBA": "Jaun\u0101 VIENOT\u012aBA", "Latvijas Krievu savien\u012bba": "Latvijas Krievu savien\u012bba", "Za\u013co un Zemnieku savien\u012bba": "Za\u013co un Zemnieku savien\u012bba", "TAUTAS KALPI LATVIJAI": "TAUTAS KALPI LATVIJAI", "SUVER\u0112N\u0100 VARA": "SUVER\u0112N\u0100 VARA", "Krist\u012bgi Progres\u012bv\u0101 Partija": "Krist\u012bgi Progres\u012bv\u0101 Partija", "Saska\u0146a\" soci\u0101ldemokr\u0101tisk\u0101 partija": "Saska\u0146a\" soci\u0101ldemokr\u0101tisk\u0101 partija", "Politisk\u0101 partija \"Stabilit\u0101tei!": "Politisk\u0101 partija \"Stabilit\u0101tei!", "Politisk\u0101 partija \"Tautas varas sp\u0113ks": "Politisk\u0101 partija \"Tautas varas sp\u0113ks", "Partija \"Vienoti Latvijai": "Partija \"Vienoti Latvijai", "Nacion\u0101l\u0101 apvien\u012bba \"Visu Latvijai!\"-\"T\u0113vzemei un Br\u012bv\u012bbai-LNNK": "Nacion\u0101l\u0101 apvien\u012bba \"Visu Latvijai!\"-\"T\u0113vzemei un Br\u012bv\u012bbai-LNNK", "LATVIJA PIRMAJ\u0100 VIET\u0100": "LATVIJA PIRMAJ\u0100 VIET\u0100", "Konservat\u012bvie": "Konservat\u012bvie", "Politisk\u0101 partija \"KATRAM UN KATRAI": "Politisk\u0101 partija \"KATRAM UN KATRAI", "PROGRES\u012aVIE": "PROGRES\u012aVIE", "Att\u012bst\u012bbai-Par!": "Att\u012bst\u012bbai-Par!", "Apvien\u012bba Latvijai": "Apvien\u012bba Latvijai", "APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Za\u013c\u0101 partija, Latvijas Re\u0123ionu Apvien\u012bba, Liep\u0101jas partija": "APVIENOTAIS SARAKSTS - Latvijas Za\u013c\u0101 partija, Latvijas Re\u0123ionu Apvien\u012bba, Liep\u0101jas partija", "Politisk\u0101 partija \"Republika": "Politisk\u0101 partija \"Republika"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1055, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1055, "cast_valid_mismatch": 402, "registered_not_positive": 1055}, "n_stations_flagged": 1055, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:31:45.397045", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.885, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.937, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.829, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.74, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.937, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.938, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.731, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.791, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.638, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.798, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.087, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.087, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1055}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "7b698cf733e448e68e4328d253dc926b", "name": "Belgium 2024 \u2014 EP per-municipality (593 muni, VB+N-VA tied)", "metadata": {"country": "Belgium", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "verkiezingsresultaten.belgium.be national XML. VB 1.03M vs N-VA 994K \u2014 Flemish nationalists ascendant. 21 parties.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": "muni_name", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"VLAAMS BELANG": "VLAAMS BELANG", "Open Vld Renew EU": "Open Vld Renew EU", "Volt Europa": "Volt Europa", "PVDA": "PVDA", "Vooruit": "Vooruit", "N-VA": "N-VA", "GROEN": "GROEN", "CD&V": "CD&V", "Voor U": "Voor U", "MR": "MR", "PS": "PS", "LES ENGAG\u00c9S": "LES ENGAG\u00c9S", "PTB": "PTB", "D\u00e9FI": "D\u00e9FI", "ECOLO": "ECOLO", "Anticapitalistes": "Anticapitalistes", "PFF-MR": "PFF-MR", "SP": "SP", "CSP": "CSP", "VIVANT": "VIVANT", "ProDG": "ProDG"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 593, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 593, "registered_not_positive": 593}, "n_stations_flagged": 593, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:31:35.160247", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.873, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.891, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.81, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.794, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.321, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.08, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.031, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.031, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.969, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 593}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a52581a72fac4566923a955b793c4f36", "name": "Belgium 2014 \u2014 EP per-municipality (589 muni)", "metadata": {"country": "Belgium", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "verkiezingsresultaten.belgium.be national XML. N-VA 1.12M plurality.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": "muni_name", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"GROEN": "GROEN", "VLAAMS BELANG": "VLAAMS BELANG", "open vld": "open vld", "SP_A": "SP_A", "N-VA": "N-VA", "CD&V": "CD&V", "PVDA+": "PVDA+", "MR": "MR", "VB": "VB", "FDF": "FDF", "ECOLO": "ECOLO", "PS": "PS", "CDH": "CDH", "Parti Populaire": "Parti Populaire", "PTB-GO!": "PTB-GO!", "Stand Up USE": "Stand Up USE", "MG": "MG", "VEGA": "VEGA", "LA DROITE": "LA DROITE", "DEBOUT LES BELGES": "DEBOUT LES BELGES", "PFF": "PFF", "PRO DG": "PRO DG", "VIVANT": "VIVANT", "SP": "SP", "CSP": "CSP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 589, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 589, "registered_not_positive": 589}, "n_stations_flagged": 589, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:31:24.963182", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.911, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.937, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.902, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.838, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.911, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.937, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.925, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.723, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.749, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.245, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.031, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.031, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.977, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 589}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4c84f44ce54e47ca929a3409d8ec1f35", "name": "Belgium 2019 \u2014 EP per-municipality (581 muni)", "metadata": {"country": "Belgium", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "verkiezingsresultaten.belgium.be national XML. N-VA 953K won.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": null, "sub_region_col": "muni_name", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"open vld": "open vld", "N-VA": "N-VA", "VLAAMS BELANG": "VLAAMS BELANG", "CD&V": "CD&V", "PVDA": "PVDA", "GROEN": "GROEN", "SP_A": "SP_A", "Volt": "Volt", "ECOLO": "ECOLO", "CDH": "CDH", "MR": "MR", "Parti Populaire": "Parti Populaire", "D\u00e9FI": "D\u00e9FI", "PTB": "PTB", "PS": "PS", "VIVANT": "VIVANT", "ProDG": "ProDG", "CSP": "CSP", "PFF-MR": "PFF-MR", "SP": "SP", "DierAnimal": "DierAnimal"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 581, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 581, "registered_not_positive": 581}, "n_stations_flagged": 581, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:31:14.841294", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.894, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.926, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.901, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.837, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.911, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.723, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.336, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.084, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.901, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.916, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.031, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.031, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 581}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a203084d999841a5b374ccee6961b321", "name": "India 2024 \u2014 Lok Sabha PC-level (top-20 parties)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "ECI PC-level. Pivoted from 8,875 long rows; top-20 parties + Other (91% coverage).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "_valid_synth", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "st_name", "sub_region_col": null, "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Aam Aadmi Party": "Aam Aadmi Party", "All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam": "All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "All India Trinamool Congress": "All India Trinamool Congress", "Bahujan Samaj Party": "Bahujan Samaj Party", "Bharat Rashtra Samithi": "Bharat Rashtra Samithi", "Bharatiya Janata Party": "Bharatiya Janata Party", "Biju Janata Dal": "Biju Janata Dal", "Communist Party of India  (Marxist)": "Communist Party of India  (Marxist)", "Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam": "Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam", "Independent": "Independent", "Indian National Congress": "Indian National Congress", "Janata Dal  (United)": "Janata Dal  (United)", "Nationalist Congress Party \u2013 Sharadchandra Pawar": "Nationalist Congress Party \u2013 Sharadchandra Pawar", "None of the Above": "None of the Above", "Other": "Other", "Rashtriya Janata Dal": "Rashtriya Janata Dal", "Samajwadi Party": "Samajwadi Party", "Shiv Sena": "Shiv Sena", "Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackrey)": "Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackrey)", "Telugu Desam": "Telugu Desam", "Yuvajana Sramika Rythu Congress Party": "Yuvajana Sramika Rythu Congress Party"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 531, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 530, "registered_not_positive": 531}, "n_stations_flagged": 531, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:31:04.954100", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.381, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.281, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.281, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 531}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d796d46a5aa249e48f732a52b8c1084e", "name": "Peru 2026 \u2014 Presidential R1 per-mesa (92.7K)", "metadata": {"country": "Peru", "year": 2026, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "ONPE EG2026 live API via onpeescraper. 92,718 mesas \u00d7 38 parties + full ballot accounting (registered/cast/valid/invalid). Fuerza Popular (Keiko Fujimori) led R1 ~17.2%; runoff 7 June 2026. Valid reconciles to 0.0004% vs votos_validos.", "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "ubigeo", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"AHORA NACI\u00d3N - AN": "AHORA NACI\u00d3N - AN", "ALIANZA ELECTORAL VENCEREMOS": "ALIANZA ELECTORAL VENCEREMOS", "ALIANZA PARA EL PROGRESO": "ALIANZA PARA EL PROGRESO", "AVANZA PA\u00cdS - PARTIDO DE INTEGRACI\u00d3N SOCIAL": "AVANZA PA\u00cdS - PARTIDO DE INTEGRACI\u00d3N SOCIAL", "FE EN EL PER\u00da": "FE EN EL PER\u00da", "FRENTE POPULAR AGR\u00cdCOLA F\u00cdA DEL PER\u00da": "FRENTE POPULAR AGR\u00cdCOLA F\u00cdA DEL PER\u00da", "FUERZA POPULAR": "FUERZA POPULAR", "FUERZA Y LIBERTAD": "FUERZA Y LIBERTAD", "JUNTOS POR EL PER\u00da": "JUNTOS POR EL PER\u00da", "LIBERTAD POPULAR": "LIBERTAD POPULAR", "PARTIDO APRISTA PERUANO": "PARTIDO APRISTA PERUANO", "PARTIDO CIUDADANOS POR EL PER\u00da": "PARTIDO CIUDADANOS POR EL PER\u00da", "PARTIDO C\u00cdVICO OBRAS": "PARTIDO C\u00cdVICO OBRAS", "PARTIDO DE LOS TRABAJADORES Y EMPRENDEDORES PTE - PER\u00da": "PARTIDO DE LOS TRABAJADORES Y EMPRENDEDORES PTE - PER\u00da", "PARTIDO DEL BUEN GOBIERNO": "PARTIDO DEL BUEN GOBIERNO", "PARTIDO DEMOCRATICO FEDERAL": "PARTIDO DEMOCRATICO FEDERAL", "PARTIDO DEMOCR\u00c1TICO SOMOS PER\u00da": "PARTIDO DEMOCR\u00c1TICO SOMOS PER\u00da", "PARTIDO DEM\u00d3CRATA UNIDO PER\u00da": "PARTIDO DEM\u00d3CRATA UNIDO PER\u00da", "PARTIDO DEM\u00d3CRATA VERDE": "PARTIDO DEM\u00d3CRATA VERDE", "PARTIDO FRENTE DE LA ESPERANZA 2021": "PARTIDO FRENTE DE LA ESPERANZA 2021", "PARTIDO MORADO": "PARTIDO MORADO", "PARTIDO PATRI\u00d3TICO DEL PER\u00da": "PARTIDO PATRI\u00d3TICO DEL PER\u00da", "PARTIDO PA\u00cdS PARA TODOS": "PARTIDO PA\u00cdS PARA TODOS", "PARTIDO POL\u00cdTICO COOPERACI\u00d3N POPULAR": "PARTIDO POL\u00cdTICO COOPERACI\u00d3N POPULAR", "PARTIDO POL\u00cdTICO INTEGRIDAD DEMOCR\u00c1TICA": "PARTIDO POL\u00cdTICO INTEGRIDAD DEMOCR\u00c1TICA", "PARTIDO POL\u00cdTICO NACIONAL PER\u00da LIBRE": "PARTIDO POL\u00cdTICO NACIONAL PER\u00da LIBRE", "PARTIDO POL\u00cdTICO PER\u00da ACCI\u00d3N": "PARTIDO POL\u00cdTICO PER\u00da ACCI\u00d3N", "PARTIDO POL\u00cdTICO PER\u00da PRIMERO": "PARTIDO POL\u00cdTICO PER\u00da PRIMERO", "PARTIDO POL\u00cdTICO PRIN": "PARTIDO POL\u00cdTICO PRIN", "PARTIDO SICREO": "PARTIDO SICREO", "PER\u00da MODERNO": "PER\u00da MODERNO", "PODEMOS PER\u00da": "PODEMOS PER\u00da", "PRIMERO LA GENTE \u2013 COMUNIDAD, ECOLOG\u00cdA, LIBERTAD Y PROGRESO": "PRIMERO LA GENTE \u2013 COMUNIDAD, ECOLOG\u00cdA, LIBERTAD Y PROGRESO", "PROGRESEMOS": "PROGRESEMOS", "RENOVACI\u00d3N POPULAR": "RENOVACI\u00d3N POPULAR", "SALVEMOS AL PER\u00da": "SALVEMOS AL PER\u00da", "UN CAMINO DIFERENTE": "UN CAMINO DIFERENTE", "UNIDAD NACIONAL": "UNIDAD NACIONAL"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 92718, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-04T10:53:54.759827", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.648, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.299, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.667, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.506, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.299, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.575, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.264, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.667, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.388, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.691, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 92718}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fb7331ec7ebb4ba0a61ac69279cc2140", "name": "Sudan 2010 \u2014 Candidates to the National Assembly", "metadata": {"country": "Sudan", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Built from NEC SQL Server backups (2010-05-03) restored locally. Source DB: ElectionsResult. Tables: FinalCentersResults + CandidatesVotesObtained + Candidates + Parties + States + constituency tables. Includes full ballot-flow accounting (received, spoiled, unused, issued, in_box, discrepancy) alongside vote tallies \u2014 uniquely rich for forensics. Pre-South-Sudan-secession: 25 northern states + 10 southern states (later \u2192 South Sudan via 2011 referendum).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_cand_210": "\u0627\u0628\u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0639\u0627\u0644\u064a \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0639\u0648\u0636 (independent)", "votes_cand_216": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u064a (independent)", "votes_cand_217": "\u0633\u0646\u0627\u062f\u0629 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_219": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 (independent)", "votes_cand_220": "\u0631\u0627\u0628\u062d \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u0628\u0644\u0648\u0644 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_221": "\u0647\u0628\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u0639\u0627\u0648\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u064a\u0645\u0646 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_223": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0645\u0632\u0629 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0641\u0631\u062d (New Sudan Party - NSP)", "votes_cand_231": "\u0643\u0648\u0643\u0648 \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0644\u064a \u0633\u0639\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_239": "\u0646\u0627\u0635\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u064a (Free Sudanese National Party - FSNP)", "votes_cand_240": "\u0645\u0642\u0628\u0648\u0644 \u0645\u0633\u0644\u0645 \u062e\u0644\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_273": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u064a\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0642\u064a (independent)", "votes_cand_275": "\u0636\u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_279": "\u062d\u0645\u064a\u062f\u0647 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_287": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062a\u062c\u0627\u0646\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0627\u062a\u062d (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_289": "\u0646\u0648\u0631\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u062b\u064a\u0646\u0629 (independent)", "votes_cand_291": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0639\u0648\u0636 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_292": "\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_295": "\u0643\u0648\u0647 \u0643\u0644\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_296": "\u0627\u064a\u062f\u0627\u0645 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_298": "\u062a\u0643\u0644\u0648\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062a\u0631\u0643 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_299": "\u062c\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0644 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 (Truth Federal Party - TFP)", "votes_cand_300": "\u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u062c\u0628\u0631 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_302": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_303": "\u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u0641\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_305": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0631\u0634\u0648\u062a\u0649) \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_306": "\u0645\u0646\u0632\u0644 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f\u0629 \u062f.\u0639\u0644\u0649 ( National Reform Party - NRP)", "votes_cand_307": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u062c\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0628\u062d\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_308": "\u0627\u0644\u062e\u0648\u0627\u0636 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062e\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_309": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0642\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Free Sudanese National Party - FSNP)", "votes_cand_310": "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0648\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0628\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0627\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0628\u064a\u0631 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_311": "\u062a\u064a\u0647 \u0633\u0631\u0648\u0631 \u0643\u0648\u0647 \u0645\u064a\u0631\u063a\u0646\u0649 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_312": "\u0643\u0648\u062f\u0649 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u0633\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_313": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u063a\u0627\u0626\u0628 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 (independent)", "votes_cand_314": "\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_315": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0635\u0627\u0628\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_316": "\u0643\u062f\u0641\u0648\u0642 \u0627\u064a\u062f\u0627\u0645 \u0646\u0627\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_317": "\u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u062f \u0645\u0624\u0645\u0646 \u062c\u0645\u0639\u0629 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_318": "\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0642\u064a\u062f\u0648\u0645 \u0628\u062f\u0631 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_319": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Socialist Mayoist Union Organization - SMUO)", "votes_cand_320": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_321": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062c\u0648\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062e\u064a\u0631 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_322": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_323": "\u0645\u0646\u0632\u0644 \u062d\u0645\u062f\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_324": "\u062e\u064a\u0627\u0631 \u0635\u0628\u0627\u062d\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u0646 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_325": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_326": "\u0628\u0631\u0634\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0644\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_333": "\u0639\u062c\u0628\u0647 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0645\u064a\u062f \u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0627\u064a\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_334": "\u0633\u0648\u0627\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0628\u0634\u0631\u064a \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_363": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0627\u0632\u0642 \u0639\u0633\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_366": "\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_377": "\u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062a\u0627\u062c \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_399": "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0648\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0647\u062c\u0648 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_407": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0643\u064a \u0631\u0636\u0648\u0627\u0646 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_424": "\u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u062f\u0627\u0648\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_428": "\u0633\u0628\u064a\u0644 \u062d\u062c\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062a\u0642\u0648\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_434": "\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0636\u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_444": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u0627\u0632\u0642 (independent)", "votes_cand_456": "\u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0647\u0627\u0631\u0648\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_461": "\u0627\u0644\u0623\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u064a\u0631 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_465": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0628\u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u0633\u0645 \u0632\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0627 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_468": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 ( Umma Nationalist Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_485": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0641\u0631\u062d (Umma, Collective Leadership Party - UCLP)", "votes_cand_486": "\u0627\u0644\u0641\u0643\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_490": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0637\u0627\u0631\u0642 (independent)", "votes_cand_491": "\u0627\u0644\u0643\u0646\u0646 \u062a\u0642\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0639\u064a\u0645 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_493": "\u062c\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0627\u064a\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_505": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0627\u0635\u0631 \u062c\u0645\u0627\u0644 ( Unionist Democratic Naserist Party - UDNP)", "votes_cand_531": "\u0625\u0633\u062d\u0627\u0642 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_539": "\u064a\u0633 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 (Sudanes Revolutionary Movement Committees-SRMC)", "votes_cand_541": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u0628\u0648 \u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_542": "\u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_543": "\u062f\u0631\u0639 \u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 (independent)", "votes_cand_562": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0642\u0627\u0644 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0637\u0627\u0631\u0642 (independent)", "votes_cand_603": "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0627\u064a \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_609": "\u0627\u0644\u0623\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0632\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_615": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u062d\u064a\u0649 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_670": "\u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0627\u0637\u0641 (independent)", "votes_cand_683": "\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u062c\u0628 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0645\u0646\u0635\u0648\u0631 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_724": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0625\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_731": "\u0625\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_732": "\u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_735": "\u0625\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u062c\u0645\u0639\u0629 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u064a\u062d (independent)", "votes_cand_740": "\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0645\u0629 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0634\u0627\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_759": "\u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0627\u0628\u064a ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_775": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062f\u0627\u0624\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0641\u062e\u0631\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_776": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0631\u0627\u0633 \u0643\u0627\u0641\u0649 \u062a\u0627\u0648\u0631 \u0646\u0648\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_782": "\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0627\u0643 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_789": "\u062c\u0627\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 (Umma, Collective Leadership Party - UCLP)", "votes_cand_794": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0647 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0644\u0627\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (Sudanes Revolutionary Movement Committees-SRMC)", "votes_cand_800": "\u0647\u0627\u0631\u0648\u0646 \u062d\u0645\u062f\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_806": "\u0633\u0639\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u0645\u0648\u0646 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_820": "\u0627\u0644\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_824": "\u0633\u0627\u0644\u0645 \u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0646 \u0633\u0627\u0644\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_828": "\u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_838": "\u0648\u0647\u0628\u0629 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0644\u064a\u0631\u064a \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_842": "\u0646\u0627\u0635\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_851": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0625\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_866": "\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0627\u064a\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0627\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_910": "\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0636\u064a\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_920": "\u0625\u0633\u062d\u0627\u0642 \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0632\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0627 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_1014": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062d\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_1019": "\u0627\u0644\u0641\u0643\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u064a ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1020": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0628\u0648 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1025": "\u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0648\u062e\u064a\u0631 \u0634\u0637\u0629 \u062d\u0633\u0646 ( National Reform Party - NRP)", "votes_cand_1026": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0631\u064a\u062d\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0634\u0631 ( National Reform Party - NRP)", "votes_cand_1079": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0633\u0628\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u064a\u0632 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_1080": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u062d\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 \u0645\u0643\u064a \u0645\u064a\u0631\u063a\u0646\u064a ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_1082": "\u0633\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0648\u064a \u062a\u0645\u0633\u0627\u062d \u0642\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0642\u064a ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1083": "\u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0627\u0628\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1084": "\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u064a\u062d ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1085": "\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0648\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_1086": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062c\u0645\u0639\u0647 \u0645\u0631\u062f\u0633 \u062c\u0645\u0627\u0639 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_1088": "\u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0636\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0646\u0627 (independent)", "votes_cand_1099": "\u0645\u0646\u0639\u0645 \u063a\u0628\u0648\u0634 \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0645\u0643\u064a ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_1107": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0633\u0631\u0627\u062c \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0645\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_1108": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u062a\u0648\u0631 \u0643\u0628\u064a\u0631 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_1109": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u0633\u0645 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_1110": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0632\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0627 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_1111": "\u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0646\u0648\u0631\u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u0628 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_1112": "\u0632\u0631\u064a\u0628\u0629 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_1154": "\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0633\u064a\u0644\u0629 (independent)", "votes_cand_1158": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0643\u0631\u064a \u062d\u0633\u0646 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_1167": "\u0642\u0631\u0634\u064a \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0632\u0643\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f\u0639\u0644\u064a ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_1173": "\u062c\u0627\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0636\u0648 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_1176": "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0648\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0627\u0644\u0645 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_1177": "\u0644\u0627\u0632\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0633\u064a\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_1180": "\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0646\u0635\u0631 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0641 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_1181": "\u0647\u0631\u0648\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0628\u0644\u0648\u0644\u0629 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_1187": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_1188": "\u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_1191": "\u0647\u0646\u0648\u0629 \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0636\u064a \u062d\u0633\u0646 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_1198": "\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0627\u0628\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Sudanese Congress Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_1200": "\u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u0641\u064a \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0627\u062f\u0645 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_1203": "\u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0634\u0631\u0649 \u0639\u0644\u0627\u0621 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Umma Nationalist Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1206": "\u0647\u0644\u0627\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0641\u0631\u062d \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 ( Justice Party - JP)", "votes_cand_1207": "\u0627\u0632\u0631\u0642 \u063a\u0628\u0648\u0634 \u0641\u0631\u062d \u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f ( Justice Party - JP)", "votes_cand_1209": "\u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_1213": "\u0628\u0644\u0627\u0644 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0628\u0644\u0627\u0644 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_1218": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0633\u0627\u0644\u0645 \u062c\u0627\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u0628 \u0633\u0627\u0644\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1239": "\u062c\u0645\u0639\u0647 \u0633\u0627\u0644\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0627\u0644\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1241": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645 \u062f\u0647\u0628 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1243": "\u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1244": "\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1245": "\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0648\u0636 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1248": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062a\u062c\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0628\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_1249": "\u0627\u0644\u0634\u0627\u0632\u0644\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0627\u062c\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_1250": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u064a (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1251": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1252": "\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1253": "\u062f\u0631\u062f\u0648\u0642 \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (White Banner Party - WBP)", "votes_cand_1254": "\u0627\u0644\u0623\u0639\u064a\u0633\u0631 \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1255": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0632\u064a\u0631\u0642 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0632\u064a\u0631\u0642 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1259": "\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0648\u0645 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u064a (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1260": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0628\u0627\u0633\u0637 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0633\u0637 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0628\u0643\u0631 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_1261": "\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0641\u062a\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1263": "\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u062e\u064a\u0631 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_1264": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0641 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_1265": "\u0646\u0645\u0631 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1266": "\u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 (independent)", "votes_cand_1268": "\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u062c\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u0641\u064a \u0633\u0627\u0644\u0645 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1269": "\u062a\u0645\u0633\u0627\u062d \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1270": "\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0628\u0631\u064a\u0645\u0629 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1272": "\u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1273": "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0648\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1275": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u064a\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1276": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0648\u0642\u064a \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1278": "\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0644\u064a\u0644\u0629 \u0645\u0633\u062a\u0648\u0631 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1279": "\u0645\u0646\u0648\u0641\u0644 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0647\u062f\u064a ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1280": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1281": "\u062c\u0644\u064a \u0623\u0628\u0648\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0642\u064a ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1282": "\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0642\u0627\u062f\u0645 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1283": "\u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0628\u0631\u064a\u0645\u0629 \u0636\u064a\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0633\u0627\u0644\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_1284": "\u0623\u0643\u0631\u062a \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0645\u0647\u062f\u064a (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1285": "\u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u0641\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1286": "\u0639\u062c\u0628\u0646\u0627 \u0623\u0628\u0648\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u062c\u0628\u0646\u0627 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_1287": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1288": "\u0639\u0645\u0631 \u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f\u0629 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_1333": "\u0623\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0628\u062d\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1335": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0625\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u064a\u062d\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0627\u0644\u0642 (independent)", "votes_cand_1337": "\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0633\u064a\u062f\u0629 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_1340": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0633\u0648\u0644 \u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0625\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_1342": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0634\u0631\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_1344": "\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0647\u062f\u064a ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_1345": "\u0643\u0631\u064a \u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0622\u062f\u0645 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_1346": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u0644\u0643 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_1347": "\u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u064a\u0632 \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_1364": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1366": "\u0642\u064a\u0644\u0648\u0628 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u064a ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1368": "\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1370": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0641\u0642\u064a\u0631 \u0633\u0627\u062a\u064a (independent)", "votes_cand_1389": "\u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u062f\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1392": "\u0631\u0627\u0628\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0627\u0643\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u062f\u0648\u0649 \u0627\u062e\u0631\u0634 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1394": "\u0645\u0627\u0644\u0643 \u062a\u0648\u062a\u0648 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0648\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1398": "\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0642\u064a\u062f\u0648\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u0627\u0645\u0648\u0646 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1401": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1402": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u0646 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1403": "\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0648\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1407": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1411": "\u0628\u062e\u062a\u0627\u0646 \u0647\u0627\u0631\u0648\u0646 \u062c\u062f\u064a\u062f \u062d\u0645\u062f\u0648\u0646 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1414": "\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1467": "\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1469": "\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u064a\u0632 \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 (independent)", "votes_cand_1470": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0645\u064a\u0631\u063a\u0646\u064a \u0639\u0635\u0627\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1474": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0632\u064a\u062f \u0647\u0627\u0631\u0648\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0632\u064a\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1479": "\u0627\u0644\u062e\u062a\u0645 \u062a\u0627\u062c \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u063a\u0641\u0648\u0631 \u062a\u0627\u062c \u0627\u0644\u062e\u062a\u0645 (Sudanese Congress Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_1481": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062e\u064a\u0631\u064a \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0645\u062d\u062c\u0648\u0628 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_1485": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0644\u0627\u0644 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0628\u0644\u0627\u0644 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1486": "\u0628\u062f\u0631\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0646\u0642\u062f \u0633\u0631\u0627\u062c \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1487": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_1617": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u064a\u0632 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0637\u0627\u0631\u0642 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_1618": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1620": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u062c\u0648\u0628 \u0639\u0627\u062f\u0644 (independent)", "votes_cand_1623": "\u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0627\u0633\u0627\u0645\u0629 (independent)", "votes_cand_1658": "\u0627\u0644\u0632\u0627\u0643\u064a \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0642\u064a ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_1663": "\u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u0646 \u062f\u0641\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0648\u0645 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1665": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0628\u0644\u0648 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1668": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 (New Sudan Organization Party - NSOP)", "votes_cand_1670": "\u0634\u0637\u0629 \u0633\u0628\u064a\u0644 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_1733": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u064a\u0633 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1734": "\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0634\u0627 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1735": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u064a\u0633 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1736": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0627\u062d\u0649 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1737": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u062c\u0628\u0629 \u0645\u062e\u062a\u0627\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0635\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0627\u0633\u0631 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_1738": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0634\u0646\u0628 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_1739": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0628\u0644\u0648\u0644\u0629 \u0639\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0627\u0628\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Socialist Democratic Union Organization -SDUO)", "votes_cand_1741": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_1742": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0647\u064a\u062b\u0645 (United Democratic Unionist  (United) - UDUP)", "votes_cand_1743": "\u0645\u062e\u062a\u0627\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_1746": "\u0645\u0633\u0627\u0639\u062f \u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0633\u0639\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_1747": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0635\u0628\u0627\u062d \u0646\u0632\u0627\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_1749": "\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u062a\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0647\u0627\u0634\u0645 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_1751": "\u062a\u062d\u0627\u0645\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_1752": "\u0645\u0631\u0643\u0632\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_1754": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_1755": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0646\u0635\u0631\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( National Renaissance Party - NRP)", "votes_cand_1756": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0627\u064a\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_1757": "\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_1758": "\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0627 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1760": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0644\u0629 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u062d\u0633\u0646 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_1762": "\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0646\u0635\u0631\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_1763": "\u062c\u0627\u0645\u0639 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u062c\u0627\u0645\u0639 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_1764": "\u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0646\u0627\u0635\u0631 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0646\u0627\u0635\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_1765": "\u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u062c\u0645\u0639\u0647 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_1767": "\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0627\u062b\u0642 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_1769": "\u0636\u0648\u0627\u0644\u0628\u064a\u062a \u0645\u0641\u0631\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_1770": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0645\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_1771": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062e\u0627\u0648\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_1772": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0646\u064a (independent)", "votes_cand_1773": "\u0627\u0644\u0632\u0628\u064a\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0633\u0627\u062a\u0631 \u0642\u0645\u0631\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_1775": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0647\u0627\u0634\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_1777": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0643\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_1778": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_1779": "\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062e\u0644\u064a\u0644 (independent)", "votes_cand_1780": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_1783": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_1784": "\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0641\u0627\u0637\u0645\u0629 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_1785": "\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0639\u064a\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_1792": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1793": "\u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0628\u0634\u0627\u0631\u0629 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_1795": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0643\u064a \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645  \u0643\u0645\u0627\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_1797": "\u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0645\u062f \u0641\u064a\u0635\u0644 (White Banner Party - WBP)", "votes_cand_1798": "\u0647\u0628\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0645\u0647\u062f\u064a \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_1799": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u0642\u0628\u0648\u0644 \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1801": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1805": "\u0633\u0639\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0633\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u062a\u0645 \u062d\u064a\u062f\u0631 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_1808": "\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u0643\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0646\u062c\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1810": "\u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0647\u0628\u0648\u0628\u0629 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1811": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0639\u0632 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( National Reform Party - NRP)", "votes_cand_1812": "\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0642\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0646\u0627 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u064a (independent)", "votes_cand_1813": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_1814": "\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1815": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0646\u0635\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_1818": "\u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0627\u0644\u062a\u062c\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_1821": "\u0635\u0627\u063a\u0629 \u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1822": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062a\u062c\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_1833": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_1839": "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u062c\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0647\u062f\u064a \u0641\u0648\u0632\u064a (independent)", "votes_cand_1846": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0641\u0631\u062d \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_1851": "\u0628\u0634\u0631 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0627\u0636\u0644 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_1857": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643 (independent)", "votes_cand_1859": "\u062a\u0648\u0628\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0639\u0644\u0649 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1871": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062f\u0644\u0627\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_1876": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062d\u0633\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0633\u0648\u0644 (independent)", "votes_cand_1882": "\u0628\u0634\u0627\u0631\u0629 \u0627\u0633\u062d\u0642 \u0628\u0634\u0627\u0631\u0629 \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d (Justice National Party - JNP)", "votes_cand_1887": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f\u0646\u064a \u0628\u0627\u0633\u0628\u0627\u0631 \u062c\u0639\u0641\u0631 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_1894": "\u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1910": "\u0643\u0648\u0643\u0648 \u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 (New National Democratic Party - NNDP)", "votes_cand_1950": "\u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1972": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u064a\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u062f\u0649  \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1979": "\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0642\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0646\u0627 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0632\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_1983": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_1987": "\u0645\u0646\u0635\u0648\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0647\u064a\u062b\u0645 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_1992": "\u062d\u0631\u064a\u0632 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u063a\u0627\u0632\u0649 ( National Reform Party - NRP)", "votes_cand_1996": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0632\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0627 \u0645\u0627\u0644\u0643 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_2006": "\u062e\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062e\u0636\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_2007": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0643\u0645 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_2011": "\u062d\u0645\u0632\u0629 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 \u062d\u0645\u0632\u0629 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_2012": "\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u064a ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_2014": "\u062c\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0637\u0647 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_2015": "\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u0639\u0627\u0648\u064a\u0629 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_2018": "\u0627\u0645\u0627\u0645\u0647 \u0633\u064a\u062f\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0641 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2019": "\u0627\u064a\u0648\u0628 \u0637\u0647 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_2022": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0641\u064a\u0638 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0643\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0641\u064a\u0638 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_2029": "\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u064a \u062f\u064a\u0627\u0628 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_2032": "\u0634\u0631\u0641\u064a \u0633\u0643\u0648\u062a\u0629 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_2034": "\u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u064a (independent)", "votes_cand_2038": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0639\u0648\u0641 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_2040": "\u0639\u064a\u0633\u0627\u0648\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_2047": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0635\u064a\u0631\u064a \u0646\u062c\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (Sudanes Revolutionary Movement Committees-SRMC)", "votes_cand_2052": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u062c\u064a\u062f \u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0637\u0647 (independent)", "votes_cand_2054": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 ( Umma Nationalist Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_2060": "\u0633\u0648\u0631\u0643\u062a\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 (independent)", "votes_cand_2062": "\u0643\u0641\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_2069": "\u0628\u0644\u0627\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_2072": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0647\u0627\u0628 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0641 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_2079": "\u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_2080": "\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_2081": "\u0637\u0647 \u0641\u0631\u062d \u0645\u062f\u062b\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_2083": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 \u062c\u0639\u0641\u0631 \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_2103": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0646\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u064a\u0648\u0646\u0633 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2104": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0637\u0644\u0627\u0644 (Justice National Party - JNP)", "votes_cand_2106": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0645\u0643\u064a ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_2110": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_2111": "\u0645\u062c\u0630\u0648\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0627\u0645\u0648\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_2112": "\u062d\u0631\u0628\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_2113": "\u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u064a \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_2114": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u0631\u062b \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0646\u062c\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (New National Democratic Party - NNDP)", "votes_cand_2115": "\u0639\u0637\u064a\u0629 \u0645\u0643\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_2121": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u0627\u0628\u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u0633\u0645 ( National Reform Party - NRP)", "votes_cand_2122": "\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2124": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 \u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_2135": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_2138": "\u0625\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u062a\u0627\u062c \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0637\u0647 (independent)", "votes_cand_2139": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0634\u0646\u0648\u0628\u0629 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u064a (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_2140": "\u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2141": "\u062c\u0631\u0645\u0629 \u062c\u0646\u0642\u0627\u0644\u0629 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Al Sudan Anna Party - AAP)", "votes_cand_2143": "\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0641\u064a\u0635\u0644 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_2144": "\u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_2146": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0625\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0632\u064a\u0646 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_2147": "\u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062e\u062a\u0627\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2148": "\u0623\u062c\u0628\u064a\u0631 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u0646 \u062d\u0633\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_2149": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u064a\u062d\u064a (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_2150": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u062e\u0627\u0637\u0631 \u0628\u062f\u0648\u064a \u062c\u0645\u0627\u0644 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2152": "\u0625\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u064a\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_2153": "\u0627\u0644\u0632\u0628\u064a\u0631 \u0623\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062c\u0645\u0627\u0644 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_2154": "\u0628\u0634\u0631 \u0625\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_2155": "\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0646\u0648\u0631\u064a\u0646 \u0647\u0634\u0627\u0645 (Peoples  Forces for Rights and Democracy - PFRD)", "votes_cand_2156": "\u062a\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u062d\u062c\u0627\u0632 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u062f\u0648 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2157": "\u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0623\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0625\u0633\u062d\u0642 \u0637\u064a\u0628\u0629 (Free Will Party - FWP)", "votes_cand_2158": "\u0645\u0637\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u0645\u0629 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_2159": "\u0647\u0627\u0631\u0648\u0646 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0645\u062e\u062a\u0627\u0631 (Al Sudan Anna Party - AAP)", "votes_cand_2162": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2163": "\u0623\u0628\u0648\u0647 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u064a ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_2164": "\u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645\u0629 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u062a\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_2165": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u064a\u0646\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0636\u0648\u0627\u064a \u0639\u064a\u0646\u0629 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_2166": "\u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0646\u0648\u0631\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_2167": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2168": "\u0642\u062c\u0629 \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0635\u0648\u0635\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2169": "\u0623\u0631\u0628\u0627\u0628 \u0623\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u064a\u0648\u0646\u0633 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_2170": "\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u0631\u0628\u0627\u0628 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_2171": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0627\u062a\u062d (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_2172": "\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0629 \u062d\u0644\u0648 \u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2173": "\u0623\u062a\u064a\u0645 \u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u062a\u064a\u0631\u0627\u0628 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_2174": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_2175": "\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 \u0628\u0631\u064a\u0631 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_2184": "\u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0627\u062a\u0645 (Sudanese Congress Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_2194": "\u0648\u0631\u0627\u0642 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0641\u062a\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_2198": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u0631\u062b ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_2203": "\u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0645\u0632\u0645\u0644 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u064a (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2208": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0628\u0634\u0627\u0631\u0629 (independent)", "votes_cand_2211": "\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_2214": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0633\u0648\u0642\u064a \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u064a \u062d\u0627\u0641\u0638 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_2215": "\u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0644\u0647 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_2216": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0642\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u062c\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_2217": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u064a (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_2218": "\u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_2219": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0642\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_2221": "\u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0645\u0647\u062f\u064a (independent)", "votes_cand_2222": "\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0631\u062c\u0648\u0628 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2223": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0643\u0631\u0627\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_2224": "\u0628\u0637\u0631\u0627\u0646 \u062d\u0627\u062c \u0631\u062d\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u062d\u0627\u062c \u0631\u062d\u0645\u0629 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_2225": "\u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0631\u064a\u0639 \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0644\u064a \u0643\u0646\u062a\u0628\u0627\u064a ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_2226": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0641\u0627\u0639\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_2227": "\u062e\u0645\u064a\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_2228": "\u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0645\u0628\u0631\u0648\u0643 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u062c\u0645\u0627\u0644 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_2229": "\u0628\u064a\u0646\u0627\u0648\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u064a\u0646\u0627\u0648\u0649 \u064a\u0627\u0633\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_2230": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u064a\u0627\u062f (Muslim Brothers Party - MBP)", "votes_cand_2231": "\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 \u062c\u0627\u0645\u0639 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0637\u0649 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_2232": "\u0645\u0646\u0635\u0648\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u062e\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0645\u0646\u0635\u0648\u0631 ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_2234": "\u0643\u0631\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2235": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u064a\u062d\u064a\u0649 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_2237": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_2238": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u062c\u062f \u0627\u064a\u0648\u0628\u064a\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0645\u0639\u0627\u0648\u064a\u0629 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_2240": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0646\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_2241": "\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0629 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0637\u0644\u062d\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_2242": "\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u062d\u0627\u062c \u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u062d\u0627\u062c \u062d\u0645\u062f (United Democratic Unionist  (United) - UDUP)", "votes_cand_2243": "\u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062c\u0648\u062f\u0627\u062a (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_2244": "\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f  \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_2245": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0634\u0646\u0627\u0628 \u062d\u0627\u062a\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_2246": "\u0633\u064a\u062f\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u0649 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2247": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0644\u0647 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2248": "\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u062d\u064a \u062d\u0633\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0633\u0648\u0644 \u0633\u064a\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_2249": "\u0627\u0644\u0633\u0627\u0641\u0644\u0627\u0648\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u062d\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u062d\u0649 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_2250": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0631\u0627\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u064a ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_2252": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062f\u0641\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062f\u0641\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_2253": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u064a\u0631\u063a\u0646\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_2254": "\u0643\u0648\u0643\u0648 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_2255": "\u0643\u0646\u062f\u0629 \u0643\u0648\u062f\u0649 \u0643\u0648\u0643\u0648 \u062c\u0627\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_2256": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_2257": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u0645\u062a \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0644\u0649 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_2258": "\u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_2259": "\u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_2260": "\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_2270": "\u0633\u0639\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0633\u0639\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_2272": "\u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0634\u0631\u064a\u0641 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0641 \u0639\u0627\u062f\u0644 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_2278": "\u0627\u0644\u062e\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062e\u062a\u0627\u0631 \u0633\u064a\u062f\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_2299": "\u0627\u0644\u0633\u0646\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u062f\u0649 \u0642\u0637\u0628\u0649 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2305": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062e\u062a\u0627\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u064a\u0648\u0646\u0633 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_2307": "\u0637\u0647 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0633\u0637 (independent)", "votes_cand_2312": "\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_2314": "\u0633\u0639\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0637\u0647 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_2316": "\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0644\u0629 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u062f\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_2320": "\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0641\u0627\u0639\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f ( Umma Party - UP)", "votes_cand_2321": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0628\u064a\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2322": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0636\u0631 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u0633\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_2323": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062f\u0627\u0626\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0647\u0627\u0634\u0645 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_2325": "\u0628\u0631\u0634\u0645 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0627\u0644\u062e\u064a\u0631\u0627\u062a (Justice National Party - JNP)", "votes_cand_2326": "\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_2327": "\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 (independent)", "votes_cand_2331": "\u0642\u0645\u0631\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e ( Socialist Democratic Union Organization -SDUO)", "votes_cand_2332": "\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_2333": "\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u0641\u064a (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2334": "\u0627\u0644\u0631\u0636\u0627 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0627\u0646\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0641\u064a\u0639 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_2339": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0646\u0627\u0641\u0639 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0646\u0627\u0641\u0639 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2340": "\u0639\u0634\u0631\u0629 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_2342": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u062f\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_2349": "\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_2351": "\u0639\u0628\u0648\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u062e\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0642\u0627\u0633\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_2366": "\u0643\u0648\u062f\u0649 \u0628\u0631\u064a\u0645\u0629 \u0643\u0646\u062f\u0629 \u0632\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0627 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_2369": "\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_2370": "\u062c\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062e\u0644\u064a\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2380": "\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u062c\u0639\u0641\u0631 \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2382": "\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0628\u0631\u0643\u0629 \u0627\u0633\u062d\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u063a\u0627\u0644\u064a (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2384": "\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0645\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2388": "\u0637\u0647 \u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u0645\u0628\u062f\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0646\u0639\u0645 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2393": "\u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u062d\u0646\u0642\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_2398": "\u0639\u0633\u0627\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0643\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0641 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0628\u0643\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2403": "ACHUIL DENG DOOT MARIAL (African National Congress - ANC)", "votes_cand_2406": "WOL GOCH DAM JOSEPH (African National Congress - ANC)", "votes_cand_2411": "\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u062d\u0633\u0646 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_2429": "WOL ALEU DENG WOL ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_2433": "MATHOK KUOL MAMER WEK ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_2438": "KUR NYANG BAK BONA ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_2441": "\u0642\u0631\u064a\u0634 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u064a \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_2447": "KUR THUC MATHOK AUGUSTINO ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_2449": "MALANG MOU MATHUC JOSEPH ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_2451": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0648\u0631\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_2455": "DUAT ATEM AJIING MAYIIK ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_2461": "REHAN DENG REHAN AJUET (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2463": "NGOR ALEU DENG JOHN (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2471": "MANTAU MANUAL MAYOM (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2487": "\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u0627\u0631\u0649 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0633\u064a\u062f \u0645\u062c\u062f\u0649 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_2495": "\u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_2497": "\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u0644\u0643 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_2505": "\u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0637\u0644\u062d\u0629 (United Democratic Unionist  (United) - UDUP)", "votes_cand_2527": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0628\u0631\u0645\u0647 \u062d\u0633\u0646 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_2555": "\u0627\u0644\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 \u062f\u0627\u0624\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0631\u062a\u0636\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_2562": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0637\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u064a\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062e\u064a\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_2570": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0647\u0627\u0628 \u062f\u064a\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u0632\u0645\u0644 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_2585": "\u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643 \u0637\u0627\u0631\u0642 (Justice National Party - JNP)", "votes_cand_2594": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u063a\u0627\u0632\u064a ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_2599": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d (independent)", "votes_cand_2603": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0628\u0631\u064a\u0631 ( Nile Valley Unity Party - NVUP)", "votes_cand_2616": "\u064a\u0633 \u0639\u062c\u0628\u0646\u0627 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_2626": "\u0633\u0627\u0644\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u064a\u0633\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_2633": "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0648\u0645 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u062a\u0627\u062c \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0631 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_2637": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u062a\u0627\u062c \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2649": "RING MADUT MALUAL BONA ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_2651": "\u0645\u0631\u0643\u0628 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_2652": "WURUK DENG MARKO SANTINO ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_2656": "\u062d\u0627\u062c \u062e\u0636\u0631 \u062f\u0631\u0627\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u064a\u062f \u0645\u0631\u062a\u0636\u064a (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_2662": "\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u064a\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_2669": "\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f (National United Democratic Front -NUDF)", "votes_cand_2674": "MOU MADUT MAKUIR (African National Congress - ANC)", "votes_cand_2693": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_2705": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0631\u062d\u0645\u0629 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_2718": "\u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0633\u064a\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_2725": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_2729": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u064a\u0632 \u0627\u0632\u0647\u0631\u064a ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_2730": "\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u062d\u0627\u062c \u0641\u0631\u062d \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_2815": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0643\u0631\u062a\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2824": "\u062d\u0645\u064a\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_2829": "\u0645\u062f\u0646\u0649 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0643\u0649 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_2836": "\u0627\u0644\u0641\u0643\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_2903": "\u0646\u062c\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u062c\u062f\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Umma, Collective Leadership Party - UCLP)", "votes_cand_2909": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Umma, Collective Leadership Party - UCLP)", "votes_cand_2923": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u064a\u062d\u064a \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u064a\u0627\u0633\u0631 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_2955": "\u0645\u062e\u062a\u0627\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_2989": "\u0627\u0628\u0648 \u0646\u0648\u0628\u0649 \u062e\u0644\u064a\u0644 \u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_2996": "\u0645\u0646\u0635\u0648\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0645\u0646\u0635\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u062c\u0627\u0646\u064a ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_3019": "\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631\u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0622\u062f\u0645  \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_3023": "\u0627\u062c\u0648\u0646\u0642 \u0631\u0645\u064a\u0628\u0648\u0649  \u0639\u0645\u0631  \u0642\u0627\u0636\u0649 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_3025": "\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u062f\u0645 (Al Sudan Anna Party - AAP)", "votes_cand_3042": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d (Al Sudan Anna Party - AAP)", "votes_cand_3045": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631  \u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u0649 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_3055": "\u0632\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0627 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (Al Sudan Anna Party - AAP)", "votes_cand_3060": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062c\u0630\u0648\u0628  \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649  \u0645\u062c\u0630\u0648\u0628 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_3063": "\u0627\u0632\u0631\u0642 \u0628\u0631\u064a\u0645\u0629 \u0633\u064a\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0632\u0631\u0642 (Al Sudan Anna Party - AAP)", "votes_cand_3065": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 (East Justice and Development Party -EJDP)", "votes_cand_3070": "\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643\u0648\u064a\u0646  \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646  \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_3083": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0623\u0648\u0646\u0648\u0631  \u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631  \u0646\u0627\u064a\u0631 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_3089": "\u0622\u062f\u0645  \u062d\u0627\u062c \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f (East Democratic Party - EDP)", "votes_cand_3093": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0648\u0646\u0648\u0631  \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0628\u0643\u0631  \u0639\u0645\u0631 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_3095": "\u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0623\u062f\u0631\u0648\u0628  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f  \u0645\u062f\u064a\u0646\u0629 (independent)", "votes_cand_3104": "\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0631\u0627\u0628\u062d  \u062c\u0644\u0627\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (Truth Federal Party - TFP)", "votes_cand_3503": "\u0627\u0644\u0633\u0646\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u062e\u0644\u064a\u0644 \u0639\u0644\u0649 (Al Sudan Anna Party - AAP)", "votes_cand_3530": "ALIAP AKOL NHIAL ALIAP (United Sudanese African Party - USAP)", "votes_cand_3535": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0633\u062d\u0642 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 (Peoples  Forces for Rights and Democracy - PFRD)", "votes_cand_3602": "\u0631\u062c\u0627\u0644  \u0622\u062f\u0645  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646  \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_3660": "\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0627\u0642\u064a \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062e\u062a\u0627\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_3697": "\u0627\u0633\u062d\u0642 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u064a ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_3701": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0628\u062f\u0648\u064a  \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a  \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_3723": "\u0631\u0636\u0648\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_3734": "\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0635\u0631\u064a  \u062d\u0633\u0646  \u0639\u0637\u0627 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0646\u0627\u0646  \u0627\u0633\u0627\u0645\u0629 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_3743": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0645\u0631 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_3789": "\u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0631\u0636\u0648\u0627\u0646 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0627\u0631\u0641 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_3799": "\u064a\u062d\u064a\u0649 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0634\u0646\u0628 \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_3808": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u062c\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0644 (Justice National Party - JNP)", "votes_cand_4093": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0637\u0627\u0628\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u062d\u0633\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0628\u064a (Free Will Party - FWP)", "votes_cand_4361": "\u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0627\u0633\u0639\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_4396": "\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0632\u0647\u0631\u064a ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_4407": "\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u062d\u0633\u0646  \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_4416": "\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0645\u064a\u0644 \u0646\u0627\u0642\u064a \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_4452": "\u0637\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0628\u0627\u0631 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0634\u0627\u062f\u064a\u0629 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_4460": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0639\u0644\u0627 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_4515": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_4520": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0644\u0642\u0645\u0627\u0646 ( Umma Nationalist Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_4525": "\u0646\u0633\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0647\u0644\u0627\u0644 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_4527": "\u062a\u0627\u0631\u0633 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u064a\u0633\u064a \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_4539": "\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_4569": "\u062a\u064a\u0631\u0627\u0628 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u0645\u0647 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_4574": "\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0627\u0636\u0644 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_4577": "\u0633\u0644\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0647\u0631\u0648\u0646 \u0623\u062f\u0645 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_4586": "\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u062d\u0631\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_4592": "\u062f\u0642\u0648 \u0623\u0628\u0648\u0647 \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0623\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 (independent)", "votes_cand_4600": "\u0646\u0647\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_4603": "\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062f\u0627\u0624\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_4605": "\u062e\u0645\u064a\u0633 \u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0647 \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_4612": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u064a\u0633 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_4617": "\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u062c\u0648\u0627\u0647\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_4618": "\u0627\u0644\u0632\u0628\u064a\u0631 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 (Al Sudan Anna Party - AAP)", "votes_cand_4622": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u064a\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_4624": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_4627": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0627\u0633\u062d\u0642 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_4630": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u062e\u0645\u064a\u0633 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u064a\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_4639": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u062a\u0645\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u064a \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u064a\u0627\u0633\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_4646": "\u0643\u0627\u0641\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0641\u0631\u0627\u062c \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_4650": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_4651": "\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u062c\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_4659": "\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0632 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_4670": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0646\u064a\u0644 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_4671": "\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0627\u0641\u0638 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_4673": "\u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0641\u0631\u062d \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( National Reform Party - NRP)", "votes_cand_4674": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062e\u062f\u0627\u0645 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_4685": "\u062d\u0645\u0627\u0631\u0648 \u0628\u062f\u0648 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0623\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_4698": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_4706": "\u0633\u0627\u0644\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0639\u062a\u0632 (Justice National Party - JNP)", "votes_cand_4710": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_4711": "\u0627\u0633\u062d\u0642 \u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (independent)", "votes_cand_4712": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u064a  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_4713": "\u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0628\u0627\u0631 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_4714": "\u0623\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0647\u0631\u0648\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u064a\u0632 \u062e\u0627\u0637\u0631 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_4725": "\u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0628\u0643\u0631 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_4727": "\u0623\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u064a\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0623\u0645\u064a\u0646 ( Umma Nationalist Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_4737": "\u062c\u0627\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0647\u0627\u0631\u0648\u0646 \u064a\u062d\u064a\u0649 \u0627\u064a\u0648\u0628 ( Umma Nationalist Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_4738": "\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_4743": "\u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a \u0647\u0631\u0648\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062d\u0633\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_4746": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0636\u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u064a\u062a \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_4753": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u062d\u0633\u0646 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_4756": "\u0623\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u0633\u0648\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0645\u0632\u0629 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_4759": "\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_4776": "\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0623\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0623\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_4783": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0646\u0627\u0648\u0649 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_4787": "\u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_4870": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_5277": "\u0625\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0633\u0631\u0627\u062c \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 ( National Reform Party - NRP)", "votes_cand_5278": "\u0627\u062c\u0628\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u064a\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 ( National Reform Party - NRP)", "votes_cand_5312": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_5313": "\u0627\u0644\u0631\u0628\u064a\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_5314": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_5320": "\u0645\u0633\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u064a\u0648\u0646\u0633 \u0627\u062f\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_5330": "\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_5334": "\u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u064a \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0636\u0648\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_5335": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0648\u062f\u0627\u0639\u0647 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0644\u0647 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_5347": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u064a\u062d\u064a \u0639\u0645\u0631 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_5382": "\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_5432": "DENG ADHUAL LONGAR LUAL ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_5608": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0623\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0641\u062a\u062d\u064a\u0629 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_5624": "\u0623\u0646\u0648 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u064a\u0633\u064a \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_5644": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Al Sudan Anna Party - AAP)", "votes_cand_5647": "\u0634\u0645\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0632\u0631\u0642 \u0643\u0646\u0647 \u0627\u062f\u0645 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_5649": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u062c\u0645\u0639\u0629 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_5652": "\u0628\u062d\u0631 \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0628\u062d\u0631 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_5657": "\u0639\u064a\u0633\u064a \u0645\u062e\u062a\u0627\u0631 \u0631\u0645\u0636\u0627\u0646 \u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_5660": "\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u062d\u0633\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_5692": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0628\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_5693": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u064a\u0633\u064a \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( National Reform Party - NRP)", "votes_cand_5695": "MALEK KUOC MAYOM ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_5699": "AGAI AKOON HENRY (African National Congress - ANC)", "votes_cand_5702": "DELIEC MALEK NYANDENG ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_5704": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u062f\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_5707": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_5712": "\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0648 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u062f\u0645 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_5720": "\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_5721": "\u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u064a \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_5725": "\u0631\u0627\u0628\u062d \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_5727": "\u0646\u0635\u0631 \u0637\u0647 \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0628\u064a\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_5734": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u062d\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_5740": "\u0633\u0627\u0644\u0645 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0639\u0627\u0628\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f (Sudanes Revolutionary Movement Committees-SRMC)", "votes_cand_5749": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_5753": "\u0633\u0644\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0646\u0645\u064a\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_5755": "\u0628\u0631\u0643\u0627\u062a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_5761": "\u0627\u0644\u0647\u0646\u062f\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_5765": "\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0641 (independent)", "votes_cand_5770": "\u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_5774": "\u0623\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_5776": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0641 \u062e\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_5785": "\u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u064a\u0648\u0646\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0631\u064a\u0641\u0649 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_5789": "\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u0627\u0644\u0643 (independent)", "votes_cand_5791": "\u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u062e\u0627\u0637\u0631 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_5798": "\u0623\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u062d\u0633\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0634\u064a\u062e\u0629 \u0623\u062f\u0645 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_5799": "\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (independent)", "votes_cand_5808": "\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0623\u062f\u0645 \u0623\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u062c\u0645\u0627\u0644 ( Umma Nationalist Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_5819": "\u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0643 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_5825": "\u0645\u0643\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u0627\u0643\u0648\u0643 \u062c\u064a\u0645\u0633 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_5826": "\u0639\u0632\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0646\u0649 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_5837": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0627\u0634\u0626 \u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f (Al Sudan Anna Party - AAP)", "votes_cand_5851": "\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_5852": "\u062d\u0633\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062e\u062a\u0627\u0631 \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_5855": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062a\u062c\u0627\u0646\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0641\u064a\u0639 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_5859": "\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_5867": "\u0627\u0644\u0641\u0643\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0627\u0645\u0649 \u062d\u0633\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0633\u0648\u0644 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_5870": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u062c\u0648\u062f\u0629 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_5873": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0645\u0646\u0635\u0648\u0631 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_5876": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0631\u0632\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0633\u0639\u062f \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_5880": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_5885": "\u062c\u0645\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0632\u064a\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_5889": "\u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_5891": "\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_5897": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0645\u064a\u0639\u0627\u0628\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0645\u062d\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u064a\u0627\u0633\u0631 ( Umma Nationalist Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_5903": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u062c\u0648\u0628 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_5906": "\u0627\u0633\u062d\u0642 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u064a\u062d\u064a\u0649 \u0639\u0627\u0645\u0631 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_5908": "\u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0647\u0627\u0628 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_5912": "\u0639\u0627\u0644\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0646\u0635\u0631 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_5914": "\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u063a\u0646\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_5917": "\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_5923": "\u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0631 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_5925": "\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0629 \u0628\u0644\u0648\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0636\u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_5930": "\u0633\u0631\u0627\u0644\u062e\u062a\u0645 \u062c\u0639\u0641\u0631 \u0645\u0639\u062a\u0635\u0645 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_5933": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_5935": "\u0639\u0637\u0627\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u0627\u0645\u0648\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_5938": "\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0645\u064a\u0631\u063a\u0646\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0647\u0627\u0628 (East Democratic Party - EDP)", "votes_cand_5939": "\u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0645\u062d\u062c\u0648\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0645\u062d\u062c\u0648\u0628 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_5941": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 (Al Sudan Anna Party - AAP)", "votes_cand_5943": "\u062f\u0641\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_5945": "\u0637\u0647 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0641\u064a\u0635\u0644 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_5948": "\u0633\u0627\u0648\u0649 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0633\u0627\u0648\u0649 \u0639\u0644\u0649 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_5949": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u0646 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_5950": "\u0627\u0644\u0634\u0641\u064a\u0639 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u064a\u062f ( Umma Nationalist Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_5952": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u0631\u062b \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0639\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_5955": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0641\u0627\u0631\u0648\u0642 ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_5960": "\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_5961": "\u0646\u0648\u0631\u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f\u064a\u0646\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0644\u0647 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_5963": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u064a\u0632 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u0646 \u062f\u0641\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_5964": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0642\u0627\u0633\u0645 (Umma, Collective Leadership Party - UCLP)", "votes_cand_5965": "\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0644\u0649 \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_5966": "\u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0642\u0631\u0634\u0649 \u0645\u0639\u0627\u0648\u064a\u0629 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_5967": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_5969": "\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0632\u0648\u0644\u0649 \u0642\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0638\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_5971": "\u0628\u062f\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 (independent)", "votes_cand_5973": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_5974": "\u0637\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0647\u062c\u0648 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_5976": "\u062d\u0633\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0633\u0648\u0644 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0628\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_5980": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u062d\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0648\u0636 (Umma, Collective Leadership Party - UCLP)", "votes_cand_5982": "\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0631\u062c\u0628 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0631\u062c\u0628 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_5984": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0642\u0627\u0633\u0645 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_5986": "\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0646\u064a\u0644 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u062f\u0648\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_5988": "\u0633\u0627\u0644\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_5990": "\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u064a\u0639 ( Umma Nationalist Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_5992": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u0627\u0645 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_5995": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0634\u0631\u0641 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0646\u0648\u0631\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_5997": "\u0639\u0644\u0642\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0639\u062a\u0635\u0645 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6003": "\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0648\u062f\u0627\u0639\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u064a\u0644\u0649 (United Democratic Unionist  (United) - UDUP)", "votes_cand_6004": "\u0646\u0648\u0631\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0644 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_6005": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_6006": "\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0646\u0648\u0631\u0627\u0644\u062f\u0627\u0626\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u062d\u0649 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_6009": "\u0627\u0644\u0636\u0648 \u0633\u0627\u0644\u0645 \u0627\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u0628\u0634\u0627\u0631\u0629 (independent)", "votes_cand_6010": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0646\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_6011": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_6012": "\u0643\u0646\u062f\u0647 \u0643\u0627\u0644\u0648 \u062e\u0645\u064a\u0633 \u0647\u0627\u0631\u0648\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6013": "\u0627\u0644\u0641\u0643\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0633\u064a\u0644\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_6014": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6015": "\u0631\u0648\u0627\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0642\u0628\u0648\u0644 \u0642\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_6017": "\u0645\u0636\u0648\u064a \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 \u0632\u064a\u062f\u0627\u0646 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_6018": "\u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0633\u062d\u0642 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_6019": "\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0641\u062a\u0627\u062d \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0641 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_6020": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0627\u0633\u0627\u0645\u0629 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_6021": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_6022": "\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6023": "\u0643\u0631\u0628\u064a \u062c\u0645\u0639\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0636\u0626 \u0645\u0627\u0646\u064a\u0633 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_6024": "\u062f\u0627\u0631 \u0645\u0627\u0621 \u062d\u0646\u0648\u0646 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0645\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6027": "\u0645\u0627\u0644\u0643 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0647\u0627\u0648\u0649 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_6028": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6032": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_6033": "\u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u064a ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6034": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0628\u062d\u0631 \u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_6041": "\u0628\u0634\u0627\u0631\u0629 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u062c\u0627\u0646\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_6052": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_6053": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0633\u0646 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u062f\u0648\u0649 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_6054": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_6056": "\u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u062d\u0633\u0628\u0648 (independent)", "votes_cand_6057": "\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0635\u0627\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_6060": "\u0627\u0644\u0635\u0631\u0627\u0641 \u062d\u0645\u062f\u0648\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_6062": "\u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0628\u0644\u0629 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0641\u062a\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_6063": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062e\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062e\u0645\u064a\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 (independent)", "votes_cand_6066": "\u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6068": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0642\u0631\u0634\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6069": "\u0646\u0627\u0635\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0646\u0627\u0635\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_6072": "\u0627\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0646\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_6074": "\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f \u0639\u0632\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (White Banner Party - WBP)", "votes_cand_6079": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_6081": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u062d\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0629 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_6083": "\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0629\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_6085": "\u0627\u0644\u0632\u0627\u0643\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u062f\u0641\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (East Democratic Party - EDP)", "votes_cand_6094": "\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0627\u0645\u0648\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_6097": "\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0631\u062d\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0635\u0627\u0645 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6100": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0647\u0627\u0628 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062c\u0639\u0641\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_6128": "\u0643\u0633\u0644\u0627 \u0639\u0645\u0631  \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (independent)", "votes_cand_6130": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0634\u064a\u062e \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_6182": "\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0648\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6183": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u062d\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u0645\u064a\u0631\u063a\u0646\u0649 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_6209": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062e\u0636\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0639\u0632 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_6210": "\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0627\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062c\u0645\u0627\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_6212": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u0631\u0646 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6213": "\u062d\u0645\u062f\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645\u0629 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6218": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_6220": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0639\u0645\u0631\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u064a\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_6223": "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0648\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0644\u0624\u0649 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_6227": "\u0634\u0645\u062a \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_6233": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0648\u0636 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_6236": "\u0645\u0631\u0633\u0627\u0644 \u062c\u0627\u0628\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0633\u0637 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0641\u0627\u062a\u062d (independent)", "votes_cand_6238": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0646\u0635\u0648\u0631 \u0639\u0627\u0645\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (East Democratic Party - EDP)", "votes_cand_6241": "\u0628\u0646\u0643\u0649 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0645\u064a\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 (Sudanese Congress Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_6242": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0635\u0627\u0628\u0631 (United Democratic Unionist  (United) - UDUP)", "votes_cand_6249": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0631\u0628\u0627\u0628 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0643\u0645\u0627\u0644 ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_6251": "\u0634\u062f\u0648 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u0631\u062a\u0636\u0649 (Working Forces Alliance Party - WFAP)", "votes_cand_6252": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0628\u0644\u0647 \u0641\u064a\u0635\u0644 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_6253": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_6254": "\u0627\u0644\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u062c\u0648\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_6255": "\u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0633\u064a\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u0644\u0629 (independent)", "votes_cand_6256": "\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6257": "\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6258": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0641\u062a\u0627\u062d \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0642\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_6261": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0643\u0634\u0647 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f (East Democratic Party - EDP)", "votes_cand_6263": "\u064a\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0643\u0645\u0627\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6266": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0628\u0643 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u062f\u0648\u0649 \u0641\u062a\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 (United Democratic Unionist  (United) - UDUP)", "votes_cand_6272": "\u064a\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628 \u0627\u0633\u062d\u0642 \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_6274": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0643\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0633\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_6278": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0627\u062f\u0644 ( Umma Nationalist Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6280": "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0647\u0627\u0645\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_6289": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0647\u0627\u0646\u0649 (Sudanese Congress Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_6290": "\u0627\u062c\u0627\u0643 \u062f\u0627\u0646\u064a\u0627\u0644 \u0641\u064a\u062a\u0631 \u0644\u064a\u0646\u0648 (independent)", "votes_cand_6291": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_6321": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_6323": "\u0627\u0644\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_6326": "\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0644\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (United Democratic Unionist  (United) - UDUP)", "votes_cand_6328": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6331": "\u0642\u0648\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0646\u064a\u0644 \u0639\u0632\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0628 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6334": "\u062c\u0645\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0627\u062a\u062d \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Sudanese Congress Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_6337": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062f\u0644\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_6339": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0642\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0642\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_6342": "\u0647\u0627\u0631\u0648\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0641\u0627\u0631\u0648\u0642 (independent)", "votes_cand_6345": "\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0630\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_6348": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6352": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u062f\u0641\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0633\u0631\u0627\u0644\u062e\u062a\u0645 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_6354": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0641 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0646\u062f\u0649 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6356": "\u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6362": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_6366": "\u0633\u0631\u0627\u062c \u0637\u0644\u062d\u0629 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0642\u0631\u064a\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (East Democratic Party - EDP)", "votes_cand_6369": "\u0628\u0627\u0643\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_6370": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u0627\u0632\u0642 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0646\u0648\u0631\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0641\u0636\u0644 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_6374": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062f\u0645 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6375": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0646\u0633 (independent)", "votes_cand_6378": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6381": "\u0627\u0644\u062f\u0642\u064a\u0631 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062c\u0644\u0627\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_6383": "\u0645\u0627\u0644\u0643 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0633\u0641\u064a\u0627\u0646 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_6390": "\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0646\u064a\u0644 \u0636\u064a\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u064a\u0631\u063a\u0646\u0649 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6398": "\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0628\u062f\u0631\u0627\u0644\u0632\u0645\u0627\u0646 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_6403": "\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0644\u0649 \u062f\u0631\u0627\u062c ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6404": "\u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u062d\u0645\u0632\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_6405": "\u064a\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0641\u062a\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_6406": "\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u063a\u0641\u0627\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0633\u0648\u0644 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_6408": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0639\u0628\u0648\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6409": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_6422": "\u0648\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0628\u064a\u062a\u0631 \u0633\u0641\u0631\u064a\u0646\u0648 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6423": "\u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_6424": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0638\u064a\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_6426": "\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u064a\u0632 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6427": "\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0643\u0645\u0627\u0644 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_6430": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u062f \u0628\u062d\u0631 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_6431": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0644\u0645\u0649 (East Democratic Party - EDP)", "votes_cand_6432": "\u062c\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0629 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0647\u062c\u0627\u0646\u0627 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_6435": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6437": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u064a\u0632 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643 \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_6438": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0646\u0648\u0631\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0642\u064a ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6439": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_6440": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6442": "\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6443": "\u0628\u064a\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0646\u0639\u0645 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_6449": "\u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0646\u0639\u0645 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_6450": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0645\u0636\u0648\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (Working Forces Alliance Party - WFAP)", "votes_cand_6454": "\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0627\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0644\u0647 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_6456": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0639\u0627\u0642\u0644\u0629 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6458": "\u062a\u0627\u062c \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0642\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u062a\u0627\u062c \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_6460": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u063a\u0646\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6461": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_6462": "\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u0633\u062d\u0642 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_6464": "\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0639\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0639\u0635\u0627\u0645 ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_6465": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 (independent)", "votes_cand_6466": "\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0633\u062d\u0642 \u064a\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6467": "\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0644\u0648\u0644\u0629 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_6468": "\u0628\u0634\u0627\u0631\u0629 \u062c\u0627\u0628\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0628\u0649 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_6471": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0647 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0647\u0627\u0634\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0647 (independent)", "votes_cand_6474": "\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0643\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0639\u0645\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_6476": "\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0646\u0648\u0631\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_6478": "\u0627\u0644\u0631\u0636\u0649 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_6480": "\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0643\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0637\u0644\u0628 ( Umma Nationalist Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6482": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_6484": "\u062c\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0629 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0634\u0648\u0642\u0649 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6486": "\u0628\u062f\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_6487": "\u0645\u0636\u0648\u0649 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u062c\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0629 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6489": "\u062c\u0627\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u0628 \u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6492": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u062d\u0649 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_6495": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0628\u064a\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_6498": "\u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0639\u0644\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_6500": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_6503": "\u062f\u0641\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0633\u062d\u0642 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_6508": "\u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u062d\u0633\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_6510": "\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6512": "\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_6514": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062f\u0641\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_6515": "\u0627\u0644\u0634\u0627\u064a\u0628 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062c\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0629 \u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_6516": "\u062e\u0645\u064a\u0633 \u0647\u0627\u0634\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u064a\u0632 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_6517": "\u0627\u0633\u062d\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0636\u0648 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u0645\u0629 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_6519": "\u0639\u0648\u0648\u0636\u0629 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_6521": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0639\u0627\u0642\u0644\u0629 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0644\u0643 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_6524": "\u0627\u0631\u0628\u0627\u0628 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u0649 ( Umma Nationalist Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6526": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6528": "\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0644\u0649 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_6529": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0647\u062f\u0649 \u0645\u062f\u062b\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_6531": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u062d\u0649 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u0633\u0645 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6533": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_6536": "\u0627\u0644\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 (Umma, Collective Leadership Party - UCLP)", "votes_cand_6538": "\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_6561": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_6566": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u063a\u0632\u0627\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_6567": "\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0644\u0649 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_6568": "\u0627\u0633\u062d\u0642 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u062d\u0646\u0647 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_6572": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0639\u0634\u0631\u0629 \u062e\u064a\u0631\u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_6574": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062f\u064a\u0627\u0628 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6575": "\u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u062f\u0631 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u062f\u062c\u0627\u0646\u0647 (independent)", "votes_cand_6577": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6578": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0643\u0627\u0634\u0641\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0645\u0647\u062f\u0649 \u0645\u062c\u0627\u0647\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_6579": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0639\u0644\u0649 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_6580": "\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u0627\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6587": "\u0642\u0627\u0633\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0642\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_6588": "\u0627\u0644\u0643\u0648\u064a\u0631\u0633 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 ( Socialist Mayoist Union Organization - SMUO)", "votes_cand_6590": "\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0646\u064a\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 (independent)", "votes_cand_6593": "\u0627\u0644\u0646\u062a\u064a\u0642\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0648\u0645 ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_6605": "\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_6739": "\u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u064a\u0648\u0646\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u064a\u062d ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6740": "\u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d (independent)", "votes_cand_6741": "\u0646\u0635\u0631 \u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u062c\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0644 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_6742": "\u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0643\u0627\u0631\u0627 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_6743": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0647 \u0645\u062f\u0646\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_6744": "\u062e\u0628\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u062e\u0636\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_6745": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6746": "\u062e\u0636\u0631 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0627\u062b\u0646\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u064a\u0632 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_6747": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u062d\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_6868": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0635\u0627\u0628\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_6917": "\u0643\u0627\u0646 \u0644\u064a\u0645 \u0644\u0627\u0645 \u062b\u0648\u062c (United Sudanese African Party - USAP)", "votes_cand_6953": "\u062f\u0627\u0648 \u0646\u064a\u0648\u0643 \u064a\u0648\u0627\u0631 \u0623\u064a\u0648\u064a\u0644 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_6968": "\u062f\u064a\u0646\u0642 \u0622\u0648\u064a\u0631 \u062f\u0627\u0648 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_6976": "\u0648\u0627\u0643\u0648 \u062c\u0646\u063a\u0648 \u0627\u0648\u0644\u0646 \u0627\u064a\u0644\u064a\u0627 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6986": "\u0628\u0648\u0645 \u062c\u0648\u0643 \u062c\u0627\u0643 \u062c\u0648\u0643 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6992": "\u062f\u064a\u0646\u0642 \u0627\u064a\u0648\u064a\u0644 \u0642\u0648\u062c \u062f\u064a\u0646\u0642 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6997": "\u062f\u064a\u0646\u0642 \u062f\u064a\u0646\u0642 \u0623\u0628\u0627\u0646 \u062c\u0648\u0632\u064a\u0641 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_6998": "\u062a\u0644 \u0648\u0648\u0644 \u0644\u0648\u0627\u0644 \u0628\u0648\u062b (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_7000": "\u0623\u0643\u0645\u062c\u0648 \u062c\u0648\u0643 \u0628\u0648\u0644 \u0639\u0648\u0636 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_7003": "\u0623\u0643\u0648\u064a\u0627\u0646\u0642 \u062f\u064a\u0646\u0642 \u0623\u0645\u0648\u0645 \u0646\u064a\u0628\u0648\u0646\u0642 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_7008": "\u062f\u064a\u0646\u0642 \u0645\u0634\u0627\u0631 \u062f\u064a\u0646\u0642 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062f\u0627\u0626\u0645 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_7018": "\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0623\u0634\u064a\u0643 \u0623\u0643\u0648\u062c \u0623\u0646\u0642\u0648\u0643 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_7039": "\u0643\u0648\u062f\u064a\u062a \u062c\u0648\u0643\u0646\u064a\u0627\u0646\u0642 \u0628\u0648\u0644 \u0628\u0646\u062c\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_7046": "\u0643\u0648\u0646\u062c \u0634\u0648\u0644 \u062c\u0648\u0643 \u0644\u064a\u062f\u064a\u0627 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_7062": "\u062f\u0627\u0643 \u0623\u0628\u0644 \u0623\u0648\u0641\u0648\u0646 \u0633\u0627\u0646\u062a\u064a\u0646\u0648 (Sudanese African National Union - SANU)", "votes_cand_7066": "\u0645\u064a\u0648\u0646\u0642 \u062a\u0648\u062a \u0643\u0648\u0627\u062c\u064a\u0646 \u0634\u0648\u0644 ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_7131": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0648\u0645 \u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_7141": "\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0627\u0642\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_7145": "\u064a\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628 \u0627\u0633\u062d\u0642 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_7225": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u062f\u0648\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_7235": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0627\u062d\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_7237": "\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0632\u064a\u0646\u0648 \u0639\u0645\u0627\u0631\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_7240": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062c\u062f\u0649 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_7245": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0639\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_7248": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0647\u0631\u0648\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0631\u062d\u0645\u0647 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_7250": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u062e\u0644\u064a\u0644 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_7251": "\u0646\u0648\u0631\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0627\u0636\u0644 (Free Will Party - FWP)", "votes_cand_7255": "\u0648\u0627\u0631 \u0639\u0631\u0628\u064a \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_7257": "\u0627\u0648\u0646\u0633\u0629 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u062a\u0627\u062c \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0631 (Funj Association National Party - FANP)", "votes_cand_7260": "\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 (independent)", "votes_cand_7265": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u062d\u0633\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0646\u0648\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_7268": "\u062f\u062e\u0631\u064a \u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u064a\u0633\u064a (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_7280": "\u0627\u0644\u062e\u062a\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_7287": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0633\u062d\u0642 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_7291": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0648 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_7297": "\u0631\u0636\u0648\u0627\u0646 \u062f\u0631\u064a\u0646\u0648 \u0633\u0645\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u062f\u0645 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_7302": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0647 \u062c\u0644\u0627\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0636\u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u064a\u062a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0642\u064a (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_7316": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_7322": "\u0643\u0627\u0631\u0627 \u0628\u064a\u0644\u0648 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 (independent)", "votes_cand_7329": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0643\u064a \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_7330": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_7331": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u064a \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0646\u0635\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (Truth Federal Party - TFP)", "votes_cand_7335": "\u0627\u0644\u0628\u062f\u0631\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (National United Democratic Front -NUDF)", "votes_cand_7339": "\u0627\u0644\u0641\u0643\u064a \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_7347": "\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0633\u0627\u0631\u0629 (independent)", "votes_cand_7351": "\u0627\u0644\u0643\u0627\u062a\u0648\u0644\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_7352": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062c\u064a\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0643\u0631\u0649 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_7355": "\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u062c\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0633\u0646\u064a\u0646 (Sudanese Solidarity Democratic Party - SSDP)", "votes_cand_7357": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_7363": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0648\u0645 \u0639\u0648\u0636 (Sudanese Solidarity Democratic Party - SSDP)", "votes_cand_7378": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0644\u0645 \u0628\u062e\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0635\u0631 (Funj Association National Party - FANP)", "votes_cand_7384": "\u0645\u062f\u0646\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u0628\u0648\u0623\u0645\u064a\u0646\u0629 \u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0644\u064a\u0644 (independent)", "votes_cand_7394": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u064a (independent)", "votes_cand_7403": "\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0645\u0644 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (South and North Funj  Association Party - SNFAP)", "votes_cand_7404": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062a\u0639\u0646\u0649 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_7406": "\u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0631\u062c\u0628 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0633\u064a\u0644 (independent)", "votes_cand_7408": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062c\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0628\u062d\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_7411": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u062c\u0627\u0646\u0649 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_7414": "\u062f\u0631\u064a\u062f\u0642\u0629 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0644\u064a ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_7418": "\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0628\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0628\u064a\u0631 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_7423": "\u0631\u064a\u063a\u0627 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0628\u0643\u0631 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_7428": "\u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0631\u064a\u0645\u0629 \u062c\u0645\u0639\u0629 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_7431": "\u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0638\u064a\u0645 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_7433": "\u0633\u0648\u0645\u064a \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0628\u0644\u0627\u0644 ( Justice Party - JP)", "votes_cand_7436": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0642\u0631\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u0633\u0644\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_7442": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 ( National Reform Party - NRP)", "votes_cand_7485": "\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0623\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_7519": "\u0627\u0644\u0634\u0627\u0626\u0628 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u064a\u0627\u0633 \u064a\u062d\u064a ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_7529": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u0641\u0638 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_7576": "\u0623\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0627\u0636\u0644 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_7581": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062c\u0639\u0641\u0631 (Funj Association National Party - FANP)", "votes_cand_7589": "\u0623\u0628\u0648 \u062a\u0648\u0633 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u064a (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_7594": "\u0642\u0644\u062f\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062c\u0648\u062f\u0629 \u0643\u0645\u0646\u062f\u0627\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_7599": "\u0625\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0631 \u0625\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 (independent)", "votes_cand_7615": "\u062d\u0627\u0643\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u0645\u062d\u062c\u0648\u0628 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0644\u064a\u0644 (South and North Funj  Association Party - SNFAP)", "votes_cand_7622": "\u0627\u0628\u064a\u0646\u0627 \u0623\u062f\u0645 \u062d\u0645\u0632\u0629 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_7626": "\u062c\u0644\u064a \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0633\u0648\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u062c\u0648\u0628 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_7639": "\u0623\u0642\u0631 \u062f\u0641\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0623\u062f\u0645 \u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_7651": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0639\u0635\u0627\u0645 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_7655": "\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0639\u0645\u0629 \u062a\u0627\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062f\u0641\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u064a\u062d (Funj Association National Party - FANP)", "votes_cand_7659": "\u0642\u0631\u0634 \u062f\u0646\u064a\u0627 \u0645\u064a\u0633\u0627 \u0627\u0633\u062a\u064a\u0641\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_7813": "\u0643\u0627\u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0634\u0631\u064a\u0641 \u062f\u0627\u0624\u0648\u062f (Free Sudanese National Party - FSNP)", "votes_cand_7891": "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0631\u0627\u0628\u0649 \u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0636\u0648\u0649 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_8216": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0643\u0627\u0634\u0641\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Socialist Mayoist Union Organization - SMUO)", "votes_cand_8239": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0644\u0649 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_8253": "\u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0637\u064a\u0641\u0648\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0643\u0645 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_8257": "\u0642\u0646\u062f\u064a\u0644 \u062c\u0627\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0648\u0627\u0636 \u0639\u0644\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_8258": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0631\u0627\u0644\u062e\u062a\u0645 \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_8259": "\u0631\u0627\u0628\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0637\u0647 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_8260": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0646\u062e\u064a\u0644\u0629 \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062e\u062a\u0627\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0633\u0637 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_8262": "\u0627\u0644\u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u062d\u0627\u0641\u0638 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_8264": "\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (independent)", "votes_cand_8265": "\u0632\u064a\u0627\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_8266": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0645\u0631\u062e\u0629 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_8267": "\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u064a\u0627\u0633\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_8295": "\u064a\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0646\u062f\u064a  \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0627\u0633\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_8347": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0631\u064a\u0641\u064a \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_8414": "\u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0642\u064a ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_8501": "\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0639\u0641\u0631\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0627\u062c\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_8502": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0634\u0631\u064a\u0641 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_8511": "\u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0644\u064a  \u0642\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_8514": "\u0642\u0646\u062c\u0627\u0631\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u062f\u0648\u064a ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_8519": "\u0625\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_8522": "\u0643\u0628\u0627\u0634\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0648\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0636\u064a \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_8530": "\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0638\u064a\u0645 (South and North Funj  Association Party - SNFAP)", "votes_cand_8536": "\u0647\u062c\u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062a\u0648\u0645 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_8550": "\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (independent)", "votes_cand_8560": "\u0633\u0639\u062f \u0625\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0645\u064a\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_8571": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_8605": "\u0627\u0644\u0639\u062c\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0646\u0635\u0648\u0631  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_8609": "\u0643\u0648\u0643\u0648 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u062e\u0636\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_8610": "\u0623\u0628\u0648\u0631\u0648\u0641 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_8650": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_8666": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0646\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_8671": "\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0641 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_8677": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0627\u0632\u0642 \u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0627\u0632\u0642 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_8718": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062d\u0628\u0648\u0628 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0627\u0630\u0644\u064a ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_8740": "\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u064a  \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_8743": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0625\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f (South and North Funj  Association Party - SNFAP)", "votes_cand_8747": "\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0642\u064a \u0633\u064a\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u0644\u0629 ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_8752": "\u0642\u0646\u062f\u064a \u0641\u0648\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_8753": "\u0625\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0631\u0645\u0636\u0627\u0646 \u064a\u062d\u064a\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Funj Association National Party - FANP)", "votes_cand_8761": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u0644 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_8778": "\u062e\u0645\u064a\u0633 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062c\u0644\u0627\u0644 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_8781": "\u0643\u0628\u0627\u0634\u064a \u0643\u0634\u0648\u0645\u0629 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u0628\u0648\u062d\u062f\u064a\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_8783": "\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0641 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u064a ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_8789": "\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_8794": "\u0625\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u062c\u0644\u064a \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_8797": "\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u062a\u064a\u0629 \u0631\u062d\u0645\u0629 \u0639\u0648\u0636 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_8805": "\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u062d\u064a\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u062f\u0645 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_8807": "\u0627\u0644\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u064a\u062f\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_8815": "\u0642\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_8819": "\u0646\u0627\u0635\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u064a\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_8827": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0625\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0632\u064a\u0646\u0628 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_8907": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0641 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0647 \u0645\u0646\u0627\u0641 ( Socialist Democratic Union Organization -SDUO)", "votes_cand_8956": "\u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062d\u064a\u062f\u0631 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_9075": "\u0647\u0646\u0648 \u0628\u0631\u064a\u0645\u0629 \u0639\u0644\u064a\u0627\u0646 \u062d\u0627\u0631\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_9242": "\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_9277": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_9295": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u062d\u064a (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_9308": "\u0628\u0634\u0631 \u0632\u0627\u064a\u062f \u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a \u0627\u062f\u0645 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_9584": "\u062e\u0628\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_9591": "\u0643\u0628\u0631 \u062f\u0627\u0624\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_9766": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_9803": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_9806": "\u062d\u0633\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u062d\u0633\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_9811": "\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u064a  \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 (National Peoples Alliance Party - NPAP)", "votes_cand_9813": "\u0637\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0641 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_9816": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0628\u0627\u0644\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_9819": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0648\u0634\u064a\u0643 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_9822": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_9832": "\u0643\u0644\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0628\u0631\u064a\u0643 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (Sudanese Usoud Hurrah Party - SUHP)", "votes_cand_9855": "\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0647\u062f\u0627\u0628 \u0639\u0644\u0649 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_9857": "\u0645\u062f\u0646\u064a \u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0648\u0647\u0627\u062c ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_9862": "\u0639\u0644\u064a \u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_9865": "\u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0634\u0646\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0649 \u062c\u064a\u0644\u0627\u0646\u0649 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_9868": "\u0627\u0648\u0643\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_9869": "\u0645\u0633\u0644\u0645 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0627\u0628\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_9870": "\u0647\u064a\u064a\u0633 \u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_9886": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0645\u062e\u062a\u0627\u0631 ( Umma Party - UP)", "votes_cand_9891": "\u0628\u062f\u0648\u0649 \u0628\u0634\u0631\u0649 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0648\u0621\u0627\u0644 (Sudanese Congress Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_9896": "\u0627\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u0634\u064a\u062e \u0637\u0647 \u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0627\u0645\u0627\u0645 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_9905": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0627\u0645\u0646\u0647 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u064a\u0633\u064a (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_9910": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0643\u0628\u0627\u0634\u0649 \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_9914": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0636\u0631\u0627\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0646\u0648\u0631 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_9915": "\u0627\u0648\u0643\u064a\u0631 \u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_9916": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_9919": "\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0647 \u0627\u0648\u0643\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_9921": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0636\u0631 \u0645\u064a\u0631\u063a\u0646\u0649 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_9923": "\u062c\u064a\u0644\u0627\u0646\u0649 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_9932": "\u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_9934": "\u0623\u062f\u0627\u0628 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_9944": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_9946": "\u0627\u062f\u0631\u0648\u0628 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u062f\u0645 (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_9954": "\u0634\u0631\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_9961": "\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_9976": "\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u062d\u064a ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_9986": "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0627\u064a \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d (East Democratic Party - EDP)", "votes_cand_9990": "\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631 (East Democratic Party - EDP)", "votes_cand_9991": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0648\u0647\u0627\u062c \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u062d\u0633\u0646 (East Democratic Party - EDP)", "votes_cand_9995": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062f\u064a\u0633\u0627\u0649 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_9998": "\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0647\u064a\u064a\u0633 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_10018": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0636\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_10036": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u064a\u0631\u0642 \u0627\u0648\u0647\u0627\u062c (independent)", "votes_cand_10043": "\u0642\u0628\u0633\u0647 \u0628\u0627\u0645\u0643\u0627\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0637\u0647 (independent)", "votes_cand_10044": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0637\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_10077": "\u0634\u0631\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_10079": "\u0634\u0642\u0627\u0642 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_10083": "\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_10084": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0645\u064a\u062f\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0646\u0639\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062e\u0627\u062a\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_10085": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u064a\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u062c\u0645\u0639\u0629 (National United Democratic Front -NUDF)", "votes_cand_10088": "\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0644\u0648\u062d \u0622\u062f\u0645 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_10090": "\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_10092": "\u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u0641\u0638 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_10094": "\u0639\u0631\u064a\u0636 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (National United Democratic Front -NUDF)", "votes_cand_10096": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f (White Banner Party - WBP)", "votes_cand_10097": "\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0631\u0627\u0628\u062d \u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a \u0645\u0633\u062a\u0648\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_10099": "\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u064a\u062f\u0631 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_10104": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u062e\u0631\u0649 \u062f\u0627\u0624\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062f\u062e\u0631\u0649 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_10116": "\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_10118": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u062c\u0627\u0646\u0649 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_10120": "\u0627\u0648\u062f\u0648\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u0646 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_10134": "\u0639\u0641\u0648\u0646\u0627 \u0643\u0648\u0643\u0648 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (United National Sudanese Party - UNSP)", "votes_cand_10136": "\u0646\u0645\u0631 \u0646\u0645\u064a\u0631\u0649 \u0646\u0627\u0635\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_10142": "\u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u062f\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u064a\u062f ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_10145": "\u0643\u0648\u0643\u0648 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (United National Sudanese Party - UNSP)", "votes_cand_10146": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0646\u0635\u064a\u0628 \u062c\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0644 \u0633\u0646\u062f\u0633 (independent)", "votes_cand_10152": "\u0631\u064a\u062d\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0636\u0648 (United National Sudanese Party - UNSP)", "votes_cand_10155": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062c\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0644 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u062c\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0644 (New National Democratic Party - NNDP)", "votes_cand_10156": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0628\u0643\u0631 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_10161": "\u0646\u0627\u064a\u0644 \u062a\u0627\u0648\u0633 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0645\u0631 (Sudanes Revolutionary Movement Committees-SRMC)", "votes_cand_10162": "Achor Mariano Girjouk Siro ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_10170": "\u0639\u0648\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_10175": "\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u064a\u0648\u0646\u0633 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_10183": "\u062c\u0645\u0639\u0629 \u0639\u0632\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0634\u0631\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u0627\u0631\u0649 (Free Will Party - FWP)", "votes_cand_10184": "\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0648\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062c\u0645\u0627\u0644 (Al Sudan Anna Party - AAP)", "votes_cand_10439": "Majok Awet Batista Dominic (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_10448": "Ukaza Khojule Mesry Peter (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_10528": "\u0645\u0633\u062a\u0648\u0631 \u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u062d\u0633\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_10685": "Ali Alalah Adam Rasheed ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_11348": "Juga Bakura Ugoro Charles (United Sudanese African Party - USAP)", "votes_cand_11379": "Ibrahim Monsur Ibrahim Mahmoud (African National Congress - ANC)", "votes_cand_11718": "Fartak Tamin Mohammed Alfadil (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_11754": "Cukuo Bandas Julio Kalisto (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_11909": "Fartak Ahamed Abdar haman Issa ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_12070": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u062f\u0631\u0648\u0633 \u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_12107": "\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Umma Party - UP)", "votes_cand_12110": "\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0645\u064a\u0631\u063a\u0646\u064a \u062d\u0627\u062a\u0645 (Sudanese Congress Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_12116": "\u062a\u0648\u0631\u0643\u0628\u064a\u0631 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0641 ( Umma Party - UP)", "votes_cand_12117": "\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u0628\u0648\u062d\u0648\u0627\u0621 \u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0643\u0627\u0641\u064a ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_12119": "\u0627\u0644\u0623\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f \u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0631\u062f\u064a\u0631\u064a ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_12123": "\u0627\u0644\u0631\u064a\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0627\u0630\u0644\u064a \u0645\u0639\u0627\u0648\u064a\u0629 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_12125": "\u0643\u0648\u0643\u0648 \u0641\u0631\u062d \u062c\u0627\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_12126": "\u0644\u0628\u0646 \u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0622\u062f\u0645 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_12127": "\u0645\u0646\u062c\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u064a\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_12128": "\u062a\u0631\u0643 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0636\u0648\u0627\u0644\u0628\u064a\u062a ( Umma Party - UP)", "votes_cand_12331": "\u0642\u0627\u064a \u062f\u064a\u0646\u0642 \u062a\u0639\u0628\u0627\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_12332": "\u062a\u064a\u0646\u062c \u0637\u0648\u0627\u0646 \u062a\u0648\u0645\u0633\u0648\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_12335": "\u062a\u064a\u0646\u062c \u062c\u0627\u0646\u062c \u0623\u0646\u062c\u0644\u064a\u0646\u0627 (independent)", "votes_cand_12336": "\u062f\u0648\u0646\u0642 \u0646\u064a\u0631\u0648 \u0643\u0648\u0646\u0642 (independent)", "votes_cand_12337": "\u0645\u0627\u0637\u0648\u062a \u0644\u064a\u0644\u064a \u0628\u0648\u0644 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_12338": "\u0631\u0648\u0627\u064a \u0643\u0648\u0646\u0642 \u0623\u0646\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0627 ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_12339": "\u0642\u0627\u062a\u0643\u0648\u062b \u0645\u0628\u0648\u0631 \u062c\u064a\u0645\u0633 (National Democratic Front Party - NDFP)", "votes_cand_12342": "\u0641\u0648\u062a \u0641\u0648\u0643 \u0645\u0627\u064a\u0643\u0644 (independent)", "votes_cand_12343": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0642\u0628 \u0627\u062f\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_12494": "NYOMBE VINCENT BURENG GEORGE ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_12495": "BAMBO SAID LADO ALBINO (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_12499": "AKASHA ABDUL SALAM ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_12500": "JALLAB HAJAR MESKIN NENA ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_12503": "KENYI LADO BEPO CORNELIO (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_12505": "JUKAKOMBO DOKA JUMA SAID ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_12506": "KENYI FARAJALA FORMONA LAZARUS ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_12519": "LOSUKWA BONJO YOANE PAUL ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_12522": "SORO WANI LUMORI SEBIT (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_12523": "PETER DISTY TABAN MOSES ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_12524": "PETRO KENYI ALIGO JOSEPH ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_12528": "SONGA GALE LASU JOSEPH (independent)", "votes_cand_12530": "LUGWORO JUSTIN KUDUS ANTHONY ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_12533": "LORO WANI ABDALLA BILLAL (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_12535": "LODYIONG BOSO BENJAMIN DINA ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_12538": "JOTO MAGOG KENYI JAMES ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_12543": "AWAN LAKU JOHN ALBINO ( United Democratic Party - UDP)", "votes_cand_12544": "WANI HAY FADAMULLA ABDALLA YUSSIF (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_12545": "MORJAN LAKU HASSAN RAMADAN ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_12546": "PAUL PORU ALAMY DAVID ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_12547": "GWANGALE FATAKI ABDALLA HASSAN (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_12548": "LOTIYU FRANCIS GWAGWE CHRISTOPHER (independent)", "votes_cand_12549": "STEPHEN ALISON JOEL YONGOLE ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_12550": "LADO EL AMIN DANIEL SEBIT ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_12551": "LOMURO KUNDU WANI THOMAS ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_12552": "TAMBO JUSTIN LEMI STEPHEN (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_12752": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_12772": "\u062f\u0641\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062a\u0648\u0645 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_12795": "\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u064a ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_12799": "\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0642\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0645\u062f\u062d\u062a ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_12826": "Ahmed Mohammed Bilal Ahmed (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_13114": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_13142": "\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u064a\u0641\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_13212": "Adal Awien Teresa (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_13335": "\u062f\u064a\u0634\u0627\u0628 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u064a\u0631\u063a\u0646\u064a ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_13342": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0627\u0644\u062d\u064a\u0631\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0631\u0636\u064a \u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u064a\u0648\u0646\u0633 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_13384": "\u0648\u0642\u064a\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062f\u0641\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_13386": "\u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0626\u0641 \u062f\u0641\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0626\u0641 \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u064a\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_13397": "\u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u062c\u0627\u0628\u0631 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_13398": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_13399": "\u062a\u0645\u0631\u0629 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0644\u0649 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_13445": "\u0645\u062c\u0648\u0643 \u062f\u0648\u0631 \u062c\u0648\u0646 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_13446": "\u0646\u064a\u0648\u0646 \u0628\u0627\u0631 \u062f\u0627\u0641\u0648\u0643 \u064a\u0627\u0633\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_13447": "\u0628\u064a\u0644\u0648 \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0633\u062a\u064a\u0641\u0646 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_13459": "\u0639\u0642\u064a\u062f \u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0644\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_13460": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0641 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0628\u0643\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_13489": "\u062c\u0648\u0634 \u0631\u0648\u062a \u0635\u0645\u0648\u0626\u064a\u0644 ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_13490": "\u0646\u064a\u0627\u0643 \u0631\u0648\u0627\u064a \u0634\u0648\u0644 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( United Democratic Salvation Front \u2013 UDSFP/M)", "votes_cand_13526": "\u0646\u0642\u0648\u0646\u062f\u064a\u0646\u0642 \u0632\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u0646\u062f\u0631\u0648 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_13527": "\u064a\u0648\u0645 \u0643\u0648\u0631 \u0634\u0648\u0631\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u0627\u0631\u0646\u0627\u0633 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_13543": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0634\u0648\u0634\u0629 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0627\u0632\u0642 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_13562": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u064a\u0627\u0633 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_13586": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_13589": "\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0646\u064a ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_13748": "\u0643\u0627\u0645 \u0642\u0627\u062a\u0643\u0648\u062b \u0641\u0627\u0631\u0648\u0642 (United Democratic Salvation Front - UDSFP)", "votes_cand_13758": "\u0634\u0648\u0644 \u062f\u0627\u0648 \u0645\u062c\u0648\u0643 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_13759": "\u0644\u0648\u0645 \u062a\u0627\u0628 \u0644\u0627\u0646\u0642 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_13760": "\u0637\u0648\u062a \u0642\u0631\u0646\u064a\u0627\u064a \u062c\u0648\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_13869": "\u0628\u0627\u0646\u0642\u0627 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0642\u0628\u0648\u0644 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_13872": "\u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_13874": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_13877": "\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u064a\u0627\u0633\u0631 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_13887": "\u0634\u0644\u062a\u0648\u062a \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649  \u0628\u0634\u0627\u0631\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u0646 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_13888": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u0631 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0642\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u064a\u062d (independent)", "votes_cand_13941": "Baarkeer Awuol Lual Kuol ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_13942": "Pakaak Deng Wuor Philip (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_13943": "Gatpan Adom Hassan (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_13944": "Chan Badeng John ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_13945": "Banban Lim Chuol ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_13947": "Thac Wan Doang Jacob ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_13948": "Gatkuoth Chang Elaisha (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_13949": "Kuoth Nyoab Toc Juang (independent)", "votes_cand_13950": "Gar Koryom Ruot Michael (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_13951": "Kerjok Gatkuoth Koang ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_13952": "Nyang Choljok Puok Stephen (United Sudanese African Party - USAP)", "votes_cand_13953": "Liak Rial William (independent)", "votes_cand_13954": "Ding Makhor Buom Pur (independent)", "votes_cand_13955": "Nyang Kor Bol Jebril (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_13956": "Nyual Lul Chot Michael ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_13959": "Mal Thiong Maker ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_13960": "Majer Akuor Pech El Sheikh (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_13961": "Diang Kok Gai Riek (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_13962": "Nyuot Ruon Gatluak ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_13963": "Nyibach Ochang Ajiba Isaac (Sudanese African United Party - SANU)", "votes_cand_13965": "Manyole Moro Nganinming Michael (Sudanese African United Party - SANU)", "votes_cand_13966": "Kari Korlem Ibon Lawryan ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_13968": "Thawan Kedesho Kadawil (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_14026": "Kuong Nyuon Char Kuach ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_14028": "Diu Machar Rundial ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_14031": "Khoar Thoow Char ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_14419": "\u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u0645\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0628\u062f\u0648\u0649 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0642\u064a \u0645\u0639\u0627\u0648\u064a\u0629 (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_14424": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Working Forces Alliance Party - WFAP)", "votes_cand_14425": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u062d\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0646\u0649 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_14426": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0639\u0645\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_14427": "\u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0625\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 (Eastern Sudan Democratic Socialist Congress -ESDSCP)", "votes_cand_14428": "\u0627\u0644\u0631\u0641\u0627\u0633 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u0649 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_14430": "\u0625\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u062a\u0627\u062c \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0631 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_14432": "\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_14433": "\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0629 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_14434": "\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_14435": "\u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062c\u0627\u0628\u0648 \u062d\u0645\u0632\u0647 \u062d\u0633\u0646 ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_14436": "\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_14437": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0625\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u062d\u0633\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_14438": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0641\u064a\u0635\u0644 (East Justice and Development Party -EJDP)", "votes_cand_14439": "\u0643\u064a\u0646\u0649 \u062c\u0627\u062f\u0627 \u062c\u0631\u0645\u064a\u0643 \u062c\u064a\u0645\u0633 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_14440": "\u0627\u0644\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (Truth Federal Party - TFP)", "votes_cand_14441": "\u0645\u0646\u0635\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0632\u0648\u0644\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0647\u0627\u0634\u0645 (Sudanese National Labour Party - SNLP)", "votes_cand_14480": "\u0627\u0644\u0631\u0636\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 ( National Renaissance Party - NRP)", "votes_cand_14481": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_14482": "\u0625\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_14483": "\u0628\u0634\u0627\u0631\u0629 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u064a\u062d\u064a (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_14484": "\u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u0631\u062f\u0644\u0648 \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_14485": "\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f\u0629 \u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0647 \u0642\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0647 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_14486": "\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0643\u0645\u0627\u0644 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_14487": "\u0639\u064a\u0633\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0645\u062d\u062c\u0648\u0628 (Sudanese Usoud Hurrah Party - SUHP)", "votes_cand_14488": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643 (Sudanese National Labour Party - SNLP)", "votes_cand_14489": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u062d\u0645\u0632\u0647 \u0633\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u062a\u0645 \u0641\u064a\u0635\u0644 (independent)", "votes_cand_14490": "\u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062c\u0639\u0641\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0641\u064a\u0639 (independent)", "votes_cand_14491": "\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u062d\u0627\u062c \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0627\u0645\u0649 \u062f\u0641\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_14492": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0623\u062f\u0645 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u0646 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_14493": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0641\u0631\u062d \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_14494": "\u0645\u062c\u0630\u0648\u0628 \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 \u0628\u0631\u0639\u0649 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_14495": "\u062f\u0627\u0624\u0648\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_14496": "\u0627\u0644\u0632\u0627\u0643\u0649 \u062d\u0627\u062c \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u062d\u0633\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_14497": "\u0634\u064a\u0629 \u0643\u0646\u0648\u0646\u0629 \u0643\u0646\u0648 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_14612": "\u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 (Truth Federal Party - TFP)", "votes_cand_14642": "\u062f\u0642\u064a\u0633 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0625\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_14644": "\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0646\u0649 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0646\u064a\u0644 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_14647": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0625\u0633\u062d\u0627\u0642 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0628\u062f\u0648\u0649 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_14650": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_14652": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0631\u0645\u0636\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u062c\u0648\u0628 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_14654": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_14656": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0644\u064a\u0645 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0644\u064a\u0645 \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_14658": "\u0639\u0645\u0631 \u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f \u0625\u0633\u062d\u0627\u0642 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_14659": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u062a\u0639\u0627\u0631\u0636 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062e\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0633\u0627\u0645\u0647 (independent)", "votes_cand_14662": "\u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0623\u062f\u0645 \u064a\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628 \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d (Truth Federal Party - TFP)", "votes_cand_14665": "\u062e\u0645\u064a\u0633 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u0644 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_14668": "\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_14671": "\u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0639\u0635\u0627\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_14673": "\u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u062f\u0641\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_14674": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u064a\u062d\u064a \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u062d\u0633\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_14675": "\u0627\u0644\u0647\u0646\u062f\u0649 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0641 \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_14676": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_14677": "\u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u064a\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628 \u0639\u0628\u0648\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_14678": "\u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a \u0623\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (East Democratic Party - EDP)", "votes_cand_14679": "\u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0636\u0624 \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_14681": "\u064a\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628 \u062c\u0645\u0639\u0629 \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_14682": "\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0646\u064a\u062f \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0638\u064a\u0645 (Truth Federal Party - TFP)", "votes_cand_14683": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u064a\u062f\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_14684": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_14685": "\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u062f\u0631\u0649 \u0631\u0628\u064a\u0639 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_14686": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u064a\u0636 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_14687": "\u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u062c\u0627\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u0645\u0646\u062a\u0635\u0631 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_14688": "\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0647\u0644\u0648\u0644 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_14689": "\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0646\u064a\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062c\u064a\u062f ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_14690": "\u064a\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u0639\u0627\u0630 (East Democratic Party - EDP)", "votes_cand_14691": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0631\u0636\u0649 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0631\u0636\u0649 \u062a\u0648\u0641\u064a\u0642 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_14692": "\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0631\u0643\u0627\u062a \u062e\u0636\u0631 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_14693": "\u0643\u0648\u0628\u064a\u0627 \u0645\u0648\u0642\u0627 \u0646\u0627\u0633\u0648\u0646\u0627 \u0645\u0648\u0642\u0627 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_14694": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0637\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0641\u064a\u0638 (Sudanese Usoud Hurrah Party - SUHP)", "votes_cand_14695": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0624\u0645\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (Truth Federal Party - TFP)", "votes_cand_14710": "\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0623\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0631\u0628\u064a\u0639 (Truth Federal Party - TFP)", "votes_cand_14712": "\u0639\u0627\u0645\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_14713": "\u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0641\u062a\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_14716": "\u062c\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0644\u062f\u0627\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u064a ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_14717": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u062d\u0645\u0632\u0647 \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_14718": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0625\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_14719": "\u0627\u0628\u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u0633\u0645 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0625\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0638\u064a\u0645 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_14720": "\u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0625\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 \u0646\u0632\u0627\u0631 (East Democratic Party - EDP)", "votes_cand_14721": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0647\u0627\u0628 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0636\u064a\u0644 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_14722": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0628\u0649 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0637\u0627\u0631\u0642 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15855": "Bimuon Riak Peter Nhial (Sudanese African National Union - SANU)", "votes_cand_15916": "\u0627\u0644\u0633\u0646\u0647\u0648\u0631\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0646\u0639\u0645 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0646\u0639\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_15919": "\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u064a\u062f\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_16023": "\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0632\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0627 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631  \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_16025": "\u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a \u0643\u0648\u0643\u0648 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a (New National Democratic Party - NNDP)", "votes_cand_16043": "\u0627\u062d\u064a\u0645\u0631  \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646  \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_16044": "\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_16045": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645  \u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u062c\u0639\u0641\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_16046": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 (East Democratic Party - EDP)", "votes_cand_16047": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0648\u0649 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16048": "\u0643\u0627\u0641\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u062d\u0633\u0646  \u0635\u0641\u064a\u0629 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_16049": "\u0648\u0642\u064a\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631  \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0627\u062d\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_16050": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0623\u0648\u0647\u0627\u062c  \u0633\u064a\u062f\u0646\u0627  \u0639\u0644\u0649 (Islamic Central Party - ICP)", "votes_cand_16051": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0641\u0627\u0637\u0645\u0629  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_16052": "\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646  \u0637\u0647  \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (Sudanese National Alliance Party - SNAP)", "votes_cand_16053": "\u0622\u062f\u0645 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641  \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646  \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_16054": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0625\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644  \u0639\u0645\u0631 (East Justice and Development Party -EJDP)", "votes_cand_16055": "\u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649  \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_16056": "\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0646\u0627 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u0627\u0644\u0628\u062d\u0627\u0631\u0649  \u062d\u0645\u062f\u0646\u0627 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_16057": "\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646  \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0646\u0648\u0631  \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_16058": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d  \u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u063a\u0641\u0627\u0631  \u0639\u0627\u062f\u0644 (Sudanese Usoud Hurrah Party - SUHP)", "votes_cand_16059": "\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646  \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_16062": "\u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649  \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0628\u0643\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_16063": "\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631  \u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0639\u064a\u0633\u064a \u0647\u064a\u062b\u0645 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16064": "\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0631\u0627\u0628\u062d  \u0643\u0645\u0627\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_16065": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u062d\u0645\u0632\u0647  \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0637\u0647 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_16066": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f  \u062d\u0633\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 (East Justice and Development Party -EJDP)", "votes_cand_16067": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u0627\u0633\u062d\u0642 (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_16068": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f  \u062d\u0633\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u062d\u0633\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_16069": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0639\u0632 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_16070": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0639\u064a\u0633\u064a \u0631\u0645\u0636\u0627\u0646  \u0646\u062c\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_16071": "\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0631\u0622\u0646  \u062d\u0633\u0646 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_16072": "\u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u062d\u0633\u0646 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_16073": "\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646  \u064a\u0627\u0633\u0631 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_16080": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0647\u0645\u062f  \u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 (Eastern Sudan Democratic Socialist Congress -ESDSCP)", "votes_cand_16081": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645  \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f  \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_16082": "\u0642\u0644\u064a \u0622\u062f\u0645  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0645\u064a\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16083": "\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f  \u0643\u0631\u0627\u0631 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_16084": "\u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645  \u0625\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f (East Justice and Development Party -EJDP)", "votes_cand_16085": "\u0641\u0643\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_16086": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646  \u0645\u0647\u0646\u062f (East Democratic Party - EDP)", "votes_cand_16087": "\u0622\u062f\u0645  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u062c\u0644\u0627\u062f  \u0623\u0633\u0627\u0645\u0629 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_16088": "\u062f\u0631\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u062d\u0633\u0646  \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16089": "\u0628\u064a\u0631\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649  \u0623\u062f\u0631\u0648\u0628  \u0628\u064a\u0631\u0642 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_16090": "\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646  \u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0643\u0631\u0627\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_16091": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0646\u0627\u064a\u0644\u0627\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u0633\u064a\u062f (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_16092": "\u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645  \u0645\u062f\u0646\u064a \u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0645\u062f\u0646\u064a (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_16093": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0648\u0646\u0648\u0631  \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_16094": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f  \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_16095": "\u0622\u062f\u0645  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631  \u0622\u062f\u0645  \u0628\u0627\u0644\u0639\u064a\u062f (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_16102": "\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646  \u0623\u0648\u0647\u0627\u062c  \u062d\u0633\u0646  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_16103": "\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_16105": "\u0627\u0648\u0634\u0627\u0645  \u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_16106": "\u0622\u062f\u0645  \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0622\u062f\u0645  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Sudanese Congress Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_16107": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f   \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_16108": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u062f\u064a\u0633\u0627\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0639\u0644\u064a (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_16111": "\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633  \u0622\u062f\u0645  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Umma Party - UP)", "votes_cand_16112": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0625\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 (East Democratic Party - EDP)", "votes_cand_16113": "\u0622\u062f\u0645 \u062d\u0633\u0646  \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f \u0643\u0631\u0627\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16115": "\u0627\u0644\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0641 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646  \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0641  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_16116": "\u0639\u0645\u0631  \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0638\u064a\u0645 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_16117": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645  \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_16118": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u0622\u062f\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_16119": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_16120": "\u0633\u0639\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u0631\u0628\u064a\u0639  \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0628\u0643\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_16121": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u062f\u0647\u0628 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_16123": "\u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644  \u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 (East Democratic Party - EDP)", "votes_cand_16124": "\u0627\u0644\u062e\u0637\u064a\u0628  \u062d\u0633\u0646  \u0645\u062e\u062a\u0627\u0631  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_16127": "\u062f\u064a\u0646\u0627\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0633\u064a\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0634\u0645\u0648  \u0632\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0627 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16129": "\u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0627\u0648\u0646\u0648\u0631  \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_16130": "\u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u064a ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_16131": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u062e\u064a\u0631\u064a \u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0646\u0648\u0631\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_16132": "\u062f\u0627\u0624\u062f \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f  \u0633\u064a\u062f \u0625\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_16133": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645  \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_16134": "\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631  \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_16136": "\u0645\u0627\u0646\u062c\u0644 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646  \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_16138": "\u062f\u064a\u0627\u0628 \u0639\u0645\u0627\u0631\u0629  \u062c\u0627\u062f\u064a\u0646  \u0639\u0645\u0627\u0631\u0629 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_16140": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646  \u0623\u0628\u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16142": "\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631  \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0639\u0644\u0649 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_16143": "\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f  \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u0639\u0644\u064a (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_16144": "\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631  \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631  \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_16145": "\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0627\u064a\u0631 \u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u062a\u0648\u0645 \u0628\u0634\u0631\u0649 ( Umma Party - UP)", "votes_cand_16206": "\u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0641\u0627\u0637\u0645\u0629 \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_16534": "Deng Tong Kuol Anyuon ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16536": "John Agany Deng Kawac ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16539": "James Aguer Alich Aguer ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16550": "Monica Nyibol Aleu Malual (independent)", "votes_cand_16553": "Ayii Ayii Akol Agany (independent)", "votes_cand_16568": "Sumeya Adut Deng Amet (independent)", "votes_cand_16577": "Mohamed Mustafa Mohamed Nasir (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_16593": "Garang Akok Mading Ngong (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_16599": "John Bol Tong Jok (United Sudanese African Party - USAP)", "votes_cand_16600": "Simon Dut Mayath Akec (United Sudanese African Party - USAP)", "votes_cand_16602": "Maduok Atak Marac Dau (United Sudanese African Party - USAP)", "votes_cand_16616": "Charles  Akot Ayii Akot (African National Congress - ANC)", "votes_cand_16619": "Deng Wol Kuac Kuac (United Democratic Salvation Front - UDSFP)", "votes_cand_16662": "\u0623\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0647\u0627\u0628 \u0639\u0645\u0631 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_17390": "Jak Chuol Wie Samuel (independent)", "votes_cand_17391": "\u0644\u064a\u062c\u0644\u064a\u062c \u0623\u0648\u0642\u0627\u0644 \u062c\u064a\u0628\u064a\u0646 \u0641\u0644\u064a\u0628 (United Sudanese African Party - USAP)", "votes_cand_17392": "Yot Kurwath Deng Pal (independent)", "votes_cand_17393": "Pinydong Deng Luke Johnson (independent)", "votes_cand_17394": "Thanypieny Kunen Thuok Simon (United Democratic Salvation Front - UDSFP)", "votes_cand_17395": "Gey Gatluak Wang David ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_17396": "Chak Yat Today Michael (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_17397": "Guny Kuany Gatwech Bor ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_17398": "Bol Nguoth Lam Peter (independent)", "votes_cand_17522": "\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0631\u062c\u064a \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_18152": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0645 \u062f\u0628\u0627\u0644\u0648 \u062c\u064a\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_18153": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u062d\u0633\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_18154": "\u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_18155": "\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u062f\u0648\u0649 \u0627\u062e\u0631\u0634 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_18156": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0646\u0642\u0644\u0648 \u062a\u0648\u062a\u0648 \u0643\u0648\u0643\u0648 \u062f\u064a\u0641\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_18157": "\u0627\u0631\u0628\u0649 \u062f\u0644\u062f\u0648\u0645 \u0627\u0645\u0648\u0646 \u0639\u0645\u0627\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_18158": "\u0627\u0644\u063a\u0627\u0626\u0628 \u0639\u0644\u064a\u0648\u0647 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0628\u0634\u0631\u0649 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_18159": "\u062a\u0645\u0628\u0629 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u062a\u064a\u0645\u0627 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0648 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_18161": "\u0639\u0648\u062f \u0627\u062c\u0628\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0643\u0649 \u062c\u0627\u0628\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_18162": "\u062c\u0631\u0627\u062f \u0643\u064a\u0631 \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_18327": "\u0643\u0648\u0646 \u0645\u0646\u064a\u0627\u0646\u0642 \u062c\u0631\u0645\u0627\u064a\u0629 (independent)", "votes_cand_18328": "\u0631\u0648\u0627\u064a \u0645\u0644\u064a\u0627\u0647\u0640 \u0645\u0646\u064a\u0627\u0646\u0642 (independent)", "votes_cand_18336": "Mayol Makuac Goc ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_18339": "Deng Mathok Anyar (Sudanese African National Union - SANU)", "votes_cand_18340": "Matiop Bol Kon (Sudanese African National Union - SANU)", "votes_cand_18345": "Saad Ahamed Mohammed Al-Moez ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_18346": "Yoya Kali Noka John (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_18495": "\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0627\u0632 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0648\u0636 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_18500": "\u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_18505": "\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0646\u0635\u0648\u0631\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0628\u0643\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_18512": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_18516": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_18520": "\u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_18522": "\u0627\u0648\u0634\u0649 \u0627\u0648\u0631\u0634\u064a\u0646 \u062a\u0627\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0642\u0627\u0648\u0632 ( Socialist Mayoist Union Organization - SMUO)", "votes_cand_18524": "\u0627\u0631\u0642\u064a\u0644\u0627 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0635\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062f\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u062f\u0645 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_18529": "\u0639\u0631\u0628\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_18535": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 ( Nile Valley Unity Party - NVUP)", "votes_cand_18540": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062c\u0627\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0645\u0633\u062a\u0648\u0631\u0629 (Free Sudanese National Party - FSNP)", "votes_cand_18545": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u064a\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_18559": "\u0627\u0633\u062d\u0642 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0633\u062d\u0642 \u0639\u0644\u0649 (United Sudanese Forces Party - USFP)", "votes_cand_18564": "\u0627\u0631\u0633\u0645\u0649 \u062c\u0644\u0627\u0628 \u062e\u0645\u064a\u0633 \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_18569": "\u0627\u0643\u0648\u0649 \u0627\u0648\u062a\u0648 \u0627\u062f\u0648\u0643 \u0628\u064a\u062a\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_18576": "\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u062d\u064a \u0639\u0644\u0649 (Justice National Party - JNP)", "votes_cand_18586": "\u0645\u0639\u062a\u0648\u0642 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0631\u0645\u0636\u0627\u0646 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_18591": "\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_18597": "\u0647\u0627\u0634\u0645 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0646\u0639\u0645 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_18603": "\u0631\u0641\u0627\u0639\u0649 \u0637\u0631\u0628\u0648\u0634 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0641 (New National Democratic Party - NNDP)", "votes_cand_18608": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0636\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0636\u0649 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_18610": "\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0639\u0628\u0648\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u062c\u062f ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_18613": "\u062f\u064a\u0645\u0648 \u062c\u064a\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 ( Justice Party - JP)", "votes_cand_18617": "\u062c\u0645\u0648 \u0627\u0631\u0642\u0648\u0642 \u0627\u0642\u0648\u0632 \u0639\u0627\u062f\u0644 (United National Sudanese Party - UNSP)", "votes_cand_18629": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 (Sudanese National Front Organization - SNFO)", "votes_cand_18632": "\u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u062c\u0627\u0631\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0628\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_18638": "\u0641\u0627\u0648\u062a\u064a\u0646\u064a\u0646\u064a\u0648 \u062c\u0627\u062f\u0627 \u062c\u0648\u0646 (Sudanese African United Party - SANU)", "votes_cand_18643": "\u0642\u064a\u0644\u0649 \u0642\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0627\u0644 \u0631\u0627\u0646\u062f\u0649 \u0642\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0627\u0644 (National Democratic Front Party - NDFP)", "votes_cand_18648": "\u0639\u0631\u062c\u0648\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0647\u064a\u0628\u0627\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_18652": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062f\u0641\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647   \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0633\u0637 \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 ( Socialist Mayoist Union Organization - SMUO)", "votes_cand_18657": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_18660": "\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0643\u062f\u0648\u062f\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 (independent)", "votes_cand_18662": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062e\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u064a\u0627\u0633\u0631 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_18666": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0632\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0642\u064a\u0648\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_18674": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0632\u064a\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_18678": "\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0644\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_18683": "\u0645\u064a\u0631\u063a\u0646\u0649 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_18687": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0643\u0631\u0649 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (New National Democratic Party - NNDP)", "votes_cand_18690": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_18694": "\u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u0641\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u062c\u0648\u0628 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0647\u0627\u0634\u0645 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_18736": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u062c\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0627\u0645\u0631 \u062d\u0633\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0633\u0648\u0644 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_18739": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_18744": "\u062e\u064a\u0631 \u0639\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0639\u0648\u0636 ( Socialist Mayoist Union Organization - SMUO)", "votes_cand_18747": "\u062c\u0645\u0639\u0647 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0647\u0627\u0631\u0648\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u0649 ( Nile Valley Unity Party - NVUP)", "votes_cand_18758": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Sudanes Revolutionary Movement Committees-SRMC)", "votes_cand_18760": "\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0633\u064a\u062f\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u064a\u0631\u063a\u0646\u0649 \u0639\u0645\u0627\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_18763": "\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0627\u0644\u0628 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_18771": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0643\u0631\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u064a\u0632 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_18780": "\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_18791": "\u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0641\u0627\u0631\u0648\u0642 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_18796": "\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u062a\u0648\u0645\u0627\u0633 \u0635\u0645\u0648\u064a\u0644 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_18803": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0643\u0645\u0627\u0644 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_18809": "\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0647\u0627\u0628 \u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_18812": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_18816": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_18819": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_18822": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0644\u0647 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_18829": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0631\u0643\u0627\u062a \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 \u0628\u062f\u0631\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_18840": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 (United Democratic Unionist  (United) - UDUP)", "votes_cand_18844": "\u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u062d\u0645\u064a\u062f\u0629 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_18852": "\u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u062d\u0627\u062c \u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u062f\u0648\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_18862": "\u0628\u062f\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0645\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_18866": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0642\u0631\u0648\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_18874": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0633\u0627\u0645\u0629 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_18890": "\u062f\u0639\u0648\u0628 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0648\u0636 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_18899": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0641\u062a\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u064a\u0632 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_18913": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_18919": "\u0637\u0644\u062d\u0629 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0628\u064a\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_18926": "\u0637\u0644\u062d\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_18936": "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0631\u0627\u0628\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0635\u0627\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_18955": "\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_18968": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0642\u0633\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0627\u062d\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_18985": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_18988": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u062f\u0649 \u0645\u0646\u062f\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u062f\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_19010": "\u064a\u0633 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u064a\u0645\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_19229": "\u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0633\u0639\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u063a\u0641\u0627\u0631 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_19254": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u062d\u064a\u062f\u0631 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_19264": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_19271": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0636\u0648\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0632\u0647\u0631\u0649 \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_19279": "\u0633\u064a\u062f\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0641\u062a\u0649 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0647\u0634\u0627\u0645 (United Democratic Unionist  (United) - UDUP)", "votes_cand_19286": "\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u062c\u0627\u0628\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_19293": "\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u064a\u062f\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_19303": "\u0639\u0643\u0627\u0634\u0629 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0643\u0627\u0634\u0629 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_19318": "\u062f\u0648\u0644\u064a\u0628 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0643\u0645\u0627\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_19325": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u0646 ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_19326": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0648\u0631\u0649 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u062d\u0633\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_19329": "\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u064a\u0631\u063a\u0646\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_19331": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0645\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_19332": "\u0627\u0644\u0634\u0627\u064a\u0642\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_19333": "\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0641\u064a\u0638 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_19335": "\u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d (independent)", "votes_cand_19337": "\u062e\u0648\u062c\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_19339": "\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Socialist Mayoist Union Organization - SMUO)", "votes_cand_19340": "\u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0637\u0649 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_19343": "\u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0643\u064a\u0645 \u062e\u0636\u0631 ( Nile Valley Unity Party - NVUP)", "votes_cand_19352": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0627\u0628\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0648\u0627\u0626\u0644 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_19356": "\u0639\u0631\u0648\u0629 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u062c\u0648\u0628 (independent)", "votes_cand_19362": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0627\u0637\u0639 ( Unionist Democratic Naserist Party - UDNP)", "votes_cand_19365": "\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u062e\u0636\u0631\u0627\u0621 (Working Forces Alliance Party - WFAP)", "votes_cand_19366": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0647\u0627\u0634\u0645 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_19368": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0639\u0635\u0627\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_19371": "\u0635\u063a\u064a\u0631\u0648\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u062c\u062f \u062c\u0644\u0627\u0644 (independent)", "votes_cand_19373": "\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0627\u0628\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_19377": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u062d\u0633\u0628\u0648 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u062c\u062f \u0639\u0635\u0627\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (United Democratic Unionist  (United) - UDUP)", "votes_cand_19381": "\u0645\u0627\u0644\u0643 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0646\u0639\u0645\u0627\u062a ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_19385": "\u0633\u0639\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_19389": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u062d\u0649 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0646\u064a\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_19392": "\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0643\u0645\u0627\u0644 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_19395": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 \u0641\u0648\u0632\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_19397": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u062c\u0648\u0628 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_19400": "\u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0646\u0635\u0631\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_19417": "\u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0634\u0647\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Socialist Mayoist Union Organization - SMUO)", "votes_cand_19425": "\u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_19430": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0648\u064a\u0631\u0635 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 ( Advancement and Social Justice Party - ASJP)", "votes_cand_19433": "\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0628\u0643\u0631\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_19439": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u0635\u0639\u0628 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_19446": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Free Will Party - FWP)", "votes_cand_19466": "\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_19528": "\u0646\u0642\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0631\u064a\u0645 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_19540": "\u0645\u0631\u0633\u0627\u0644 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0632\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_19590": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u062e\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0647\u062f\u064a\u0629 ( Socialist Mayoist Union Organization - SMUO)", "votes_cand_19600": "\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_19607": "\u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0641 \u064a\u0648\u0646\u0633 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_19618": "\u0643\u0645\u0628\u0627\u0644 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u062c\u0644\u0627\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646  \u064a\u0627\u0633\u0631 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_19631": "\u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062e\u0636\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0646\u0639\u0645 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_19642": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0646\u0627\u062f\u0631 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_19748": "\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0628\u0643\u0631 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_19754": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062c\u0639\u0641\u0631 ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_19760": "\u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u0641\u0649 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0627\u0631\u0647 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_19765": "\u0633\u064a\u062f\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_19773": "\u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0639\u0637\u0627\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0646\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_19783": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0646\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_19788": "\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u062d\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0633\u064a\u0644\u0629 \u0645\u062c\u062a\u0628\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_19796": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0647\u0627\u0628 (independent)", "votes_cand_19801": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631  \u062d\u0633\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0633\u0648\u0644 \u062f\u0641\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_19806": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0644 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_19811": "\u0643\u0631\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_19812": "\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u064a\u0633\u064a (independent)", "votes_cand_19815": "\u0646\u0627\u0635\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0643 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u063a\u0627\u0646\u0645 \u0627\u0633\u0627\u0645\u0629 (Free Sudanese National Party - FSNP)", "votes_cand_19816": "\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u062d\u0645\u0632\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645 ( Socialist Mayoist Union Organization - SMUO)", "votes_cand_19818": "\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0643\u0645\u0627\u0644 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_19823": "\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u062f\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643 \u0639\u0645\u0631 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_19827": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_19828": "\u0627\u0644\u062e\u0636\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_19837": "\u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0643\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u0644\u0629 \u0642\u0645\u0631 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_19838": "\u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_19844": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u064a \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_19852": "\u064a\u0633 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062f\u0627\u0626\u0645 \u0633\u0627\u0645\u0649 (Muslim Brothers Party - MBP)", "votes_cand_19854": "\u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0627\u0636\u0644 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0630\u064a\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_19862": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0632\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0632\u062a ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_19865": "\u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0634\u0627\u064a\u0628\u0648 \u064a\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u062a\u062f\u064a ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_19871": "\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u064a \u0627\u0633\u0627\u0645\u0629 (independent)", "votes_cand_19872": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u064a\u062d\u0649 \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 (United Democratic Unionist  (United) - UDUP)", "votes_cand_19876": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u0635\u0639\u0628 (independent)", "votes_cand_19882": "\u0637\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u062f\u0648\u064a \u0646\u0635\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_19884": "\u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0639\u0635\u0645\u062a (Free Will Party - FWP)", "votes_cand_19892": "\u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0634\u0648\u0643\u062a \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0637\u0627\u0631\u0642 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_19899": "\u064a\u0633 \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0627\u062f\u0644 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_19905": "\u0645\u0631\u062f\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u064a\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_19907": "\u0627\u0628\u0648 \u0633\u0627\u0644\u0641 \u0642\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_19913": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_19917": "\u0645\u0643\u064a\u0646 \u0641\u0636\u064a\u0644 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 (United Sudanese Forces Party - USFP)", "votes_cand_19921": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u064a ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_19927": "\u0641\u0642\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0648\u0636 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_19930": "\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0641\u0627\u0626\u0632 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_19942": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u062e\u0644\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u062f\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_19947": "\u0645\u0646\u0627\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_19950": "\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0634\u0631\u0649 \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_19952": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u0627\u0632\u0642 (independent)", "votes_cand_19975": "\u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 (independent)", "votes_cand_19978": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_19985": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u062d\u0645\u0632\u0647 \u064a\u062d\u064a ( Socialist Mayoist Union Organization - SMUO)", "votes_cand_19991": "\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0641 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0644\u0647 ( Umma Nationalist Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20002": "\u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a (United Sudanese Forces Party - USFP)", "votes_cand_20013": "\u062c\u0645\u0639\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_20023": "\u0642\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f  \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0627\u0645\u0649 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20030": "\u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_20051": "\u0627\u0628\u0648 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u064a\u0648\u0628 \u062d\u0627\u062a\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_20057": "\u0628\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_20058": "\u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Sudanese National Front Organization - SNFO)", "votes_cand_20065": "\u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0648 \u0639\u0627\u0642\u0644\u0629 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_20074": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u064a\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_20078": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0645\u062d\u062c\u0648\u0628 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0635\u0627\u0645 (United Democratic Unionist  (United) - UDUP)", "votes_cand_20084": "\u062a\u0627\u0648\u0631 \u062d\u0644\u0648\u0641 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631 ( Justice Party - JP)", "votes_cand_20086": "\u062a\u0644\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_20092": "\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u064a (Working Forces Alliance Party - WFAP)", "votes_cand_20099": "\u0645\u0627\u0644\u0643 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0630\u0627\u0643\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_20104": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0639\u0645\u0631 ( National Renaissance Party - NRP)", "votes_cand_20108": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_20117": "\u0643\u0627\u0643\u062a\u0644\u0627 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_20119": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0645\u064a\u062f \u0628\u0644\u0647 \u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0646 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20128": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0631\u064a\u0645\u0629 \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Umma, Collective Leadership Party - UCLP)", "votes_cand_20133": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0647\u0627\u0634\u0645 ( Advancement and Social Justice Party - ASJP)", "votes_cand_20139": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u0631\u064a \u0645\u064a\u0631\u063a\u0646\u0649 \u0639\u0627\u062f\u0644 (independent)", "votes_cand_20148": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u064a\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0646\u062f\u064a ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_20157": "\u062f\u064a\u0646\u0627\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_20158": "\u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0627\u062a\u062d (independent)", "votes_cand_20165": "\u0647\u0628\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u0627\u0647\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_20167": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0631\u0628\u0649 (United Sudanese Forces Party - USFP)", "votes_cand_20170": "\u0639\u0645\u0631 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0633\u062d\u0627\u0642 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_20177": "\u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0627\u0633\u062d\u0627\u0642 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_20182": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062f\u0647\u0628 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_20188": "\u0643\u0643\u0649 \u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 (independent)", "votes_cand_20194": "\u062a\u064a\u0631\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_20202": "\u062c\u0645\u0639\u0647 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0647\u0627\u0631\u0648\u0646 \u0627\u062f\u0645 ( Nile Valley Unity Party - NVUP)", "votes_cand_20207": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u062c\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0628\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u0639\u062a\u0632 ( Socialist Mayoist Union Organization - SMUO)", "votes_cand_20210": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u0627\u0644\u0643 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_20212": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0628\u064a\u0628 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0628\u064a\u0628 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_20219": "\u0645\u0627\u0631\u064a\u0627 \u0641\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646\u0648 \u0644\u064a\u0648\u0646\u0627\u062f\u0648 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_20223": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_20224": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u064a\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20228": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0633\u0639\u062f (United Sudanese Forces Party - USFP)", "votes_cand_20233": "\u0645\u062c\u0648\u0643 \u0627\u0644\u064a\u062a \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u064a\u0627\u0633\u0631 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_20235": "\u0639\u0637\u064a\u0629 \u062a\u0648\u062a\u0648 \u0648\u0646\u064a\u0633 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (United National Sudanese Party - UNSP)", "votes_cand_20239": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0647 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20241": "\u0643\u0648\u0647 \u0643\u0643\u064a \u062c\u0645\u0639\u0647 ( Justice Party - JP)", "votes_cand_20244": "\u0645\u0643\u0627\u0648\u064a \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Working Forces Alliance Party - WFAP)", "votes_cand_20249": "\u0643\u0648\u0646 \u0645\u0648\u0631\u0648\u064a\u0644 \u0631\u064a\u0646\u0642 \u0628\u0648\u0644 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_20251": "\u062f\u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_20269": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_20293": "\u064a\u062d\u0649 \u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0627\u0636\u0644 \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20308": "\u0646\u0635\u0631 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Working Forces Alliance Party - WFAP)", "votes_cand_20314": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0633\u062d\u0627\u0642 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_20447": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0628\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0646\u0627\u0646\u0649 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e (independent)", "votes_cand_20455": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0628\u0643\u0631  \u0641\u062a\u062d \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0644\u064a\u0644 (independent)", "votes_cand_20459": "\u0628\u0648\u062f\u0627 \u0635\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0646 \u0627\u064a\u0644\u064a\u0627 \u0633\u0628\u062a (independent)", "votes_cand_20466": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_20477": "\u0628\u0648\u0631 \u062c\u0648\u0631 \u0631\u0648\u0631\u064a\u062c \u0642\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0627\u0644 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_20484": "\u064a\u0648\u0646\u0633 \u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_20489": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u064a\u0632 \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0627\u062f\u0645 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_20495": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_20497": "\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0646\u0648\u0631\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_20504": "\u0627\u0644\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0646\u0639\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20508": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u0633\u0645 \u0647\u0627\u0634\u0645 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (Working Forces Alliance Party - WFAP)", "votes_cand_20512": "\u064a\u062d\u0649 \u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a \u064a\u062d\u0649 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (United Sudanese Forces Party - USFP)", "votes_cand_20515": "\u062f\u064a\u0646\u0642 \u0645\u0627\u0631\u0643\u0648 \u0627\u0633\u062a\u064a\u0641\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_20566": "\u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0630\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Socialist Mayoist Union Organization - SMUO)", "votes_cand_20569": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0645\u0631 (Sudanes Revolutionary Movement Committees-SRMC)", "votes_cand_20572": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0634\u0631\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_20574": "\u0633\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0648\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_20576": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0639\u0627\u0628\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u062e\u0636\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_20578": "\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0643\u0627\u0645\u0644 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_20581": "\u0627\u0644\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062c\u062f\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_20586": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u0649 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20605": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f  \u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643  \u0639\u0627\u0637\u0641 (Justice National Party - JNP)", "votes_cand_20608": "\u0645\u0633\u0639\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631  \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0627\u062a\u062d (Sudanese Congress Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_20610": "\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u062a\u0627\u062c \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20626": "\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0628\u0643\u0631 ( Advancement and Social Justice Party - ASJP)", "votes_cand_20633": "\u062c\u0645\u0639\u0629 \u062d\u0633\u0646  \u062c\u0645\u0639\u0629  \u0646\u0639\u0645\u0627\u0646 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_20646": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u0646\u0635\u0648\u0631 \u0645\u0627\u0644\u0643 (Sudanese National Alliance Party - SNAP)", "votes_cand_20664": "\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0632\u0647\u0631\u0649 \u0633\u064a\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u062c\u0644\u0627\u0621 (United Democratic Unionist  (United) - UDUP)", "votes_cand_20665": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0633\u0628\u064a\u0628 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_20666": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062f\u0641\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (independent)", "votes_cand_20667": "\u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0645\u0624\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u062f\u0645  \u064a\u062d\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_20668": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u064a\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Democratic Awareness Movement Party - DAMP)", "votes_cand_20669": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0627\u0644\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u062c\u0627\u062f \u0633\u0627\u0644\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_20670": "\u0647\u0627\u0631\u0648\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649  \u0627\u0644\u062a\u062c\u0627\u0646\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_20671": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0645\u0643\u0649 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_20672": "\u0643\u0648\u0646\u0649 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_20673": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_20674": "\u0646\u0627\u0635\u0631 \u0628\u0631\u0645\u0629  \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20675": "\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0646\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u0633\u062d\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u064a\u062d \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20676": "\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u062a\u0628\u0646 (Justice National Party - JNP)", "votes_cand_20677": "\u062e\u0645\u064a\u0633 \u062d\u0642\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0639\u0644\u0649 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_20678": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0633\u0648\u0644 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 (Working Forces Alliance Party - WFAP)", "votes_cand_20679": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_20680": "\u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u064a\u062d\u0649  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_20681": "\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0631\u064a\u062f\u0648 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_20682": "\u062f\u0644\u0648 \u0627\u0631\u0628\u0627\u0628 \u062e\u0645\u064a\u0633 \u0647\u0631\u0649 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_20683": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0646\u0635\u0648\u0631 \u0639\u0632 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0627\u062a\u062d (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_20684": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_20685": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Socialist Mayoist Union Organization - SMUO)", "votes_cand_20686": "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0648\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_20687": "\u062d\u0648\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u062e\u062f\u064a\u062c\u0629 (independent)", "votes_cand_20688": "\u062d\u0633\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0641\u064a\u0638 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_20689": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0647\u0627\u0634\u0645 ( Nile Valley Unity Party - NVUP)", "votes_cand_20690": "\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u062c\u0627\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0628\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_20691": "\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u063a\u0648\u0644 \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 (independent)", "votes_cand_20692": "\u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_20693": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_20694": "\u063a\u0646\u062f\u0648\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u064a\u0632 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_20695": "\u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0634\u0645\u064a\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0631\u0645\u0636\u0627\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_20696": "\u0643\u0627\u0641\u0649 \u0643\u0648\u0643\u0648 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_20697": "\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0644\u0643 \u0637\u0629 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_20698": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0639\u0632\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0647\u0627\u0631\u0648\u0646 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20699": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0642\u0627\u0633\u0645 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20700": "\u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u062c\u0627\u0646\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_20701": "\u0627\u0644\u062f\u0627\u0631\u0648\u062a\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0639\u0645\u0631 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20702": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0633\u0644\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0641\u0627\u0631\u0648\u0642 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Sudanese National Alliance Party - SNAP)", "votes_cand_20703": "\u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u064a\u0648\u0646\u0633 \u0627\u0628\u0648 \u0637\u0647 \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (Sudanes Revolutionary Movement Committees-SRMC)", "votes_cand_20704": "\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_20705": "\u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646  \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Justice National Party - JNP)", "votes_cand_20706": "\u0627\u0642\u0648\u0641 \u062c\u0645\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u0631\u062a\u0636\u0649 (United National Sudanese Party - UNSP)", "votes_cand_20707": "\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u064a\u0632 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 ( National Reform Party - NRP)", "votes_cand_20708": "\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062e\u0646\u0633\u0627\u0621 ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_20709": "\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_20710": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0645\u0632\u0629 ( Socialist Mayoist Union Organization - SMUO)", "votes_cand_20711": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0636\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_20712": "\u0645\u0644\u0648 \u062f\u064a\u0646\u0642 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f ( United Democratic Party - UDP)", "votes_cand_20713": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0647\u0627\u0628 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_20714": "\u0641\u0631\u062d \u0628\u0631\u0634\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Justice Party - JP)", "votes_cand_20715": "\u064a\u0644 \u0645\u064a\u062c\u064a\u062d \u062c\u064a\u0644 \u0634\u064a\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_20716": "\u0627\u0644\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_20717": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u062f\u0649 \u062e\u0636\u0631 \u0645\u0627\u0644\u0643 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_20718": "\u0627\u0644\u0633\u0631 \u0646\u0648\u0628\u0649 \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u062c\u0627\u0646\u0649 (United National Sudanese Party - UNSP)", "votes_cand_20719": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0635\u0628\u0631\u0649 \u0639\u0646\u0627\u0646 (Sudanes Revolutionary Movement Committees-SRMC)", "votes_cand_20720": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0628\u0627\u0639\u0648 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20721": "\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_20722": "\u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0647\u0627\u0634\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_20723": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0648\u0636 (Working Forces Alliance Party - WFAP)", "votes_cand_20724": "\u0645\u062f\u0646\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0641\u0631\u062d  \u0639\u0644\u0649 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20725": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u062e\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0645\u0631 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_20726": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0648\u0645 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (United National Sudanese Party - UNSP)", "votes_cand_20727": "\u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062f\u0645 (Umma, Collective Leadership Party - UCLP)", "votes_cand_20728": "\u0627\u0644\u0628\u064a\u062a \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0636\u0648\u0621 \u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20732": "\u0627\u0644\u0641\u0627\u062f\u0646\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_20733": "\u0627\u0644\u0628\u062f\u0631\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u062f\u0631\u0649 \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_20736": "\u0648\u0646\u062c\u0647 \u0627\u0628\u064a\u0644\u0649 \u062d\u062c\u0627\u062c \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (Free Sudanese National Party - FSNP)", "votes_cand_20738": "\u0635\u0644\u0648\u062d\u0629 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_20739": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0644\u064a\u0644\u0629 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0627\u062f\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_20741": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0634\u0631\u064a\u0641 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0627\u0644\u0645 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_20742": "\u0645\u0646\u0632\u0648\u0644 \u0643\u0648\u0643\u0648 \u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0646\u0627\u062b (independent)", "votes_cand_20744": "\u0627\u063a\u0628\u0634 \u0645\u0647\u062f\u0649 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Free Will Party - FWP)", "votes_cand_20746": "\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0641 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0641\u062a\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u064a\u0645 ( National Reform Party - NRP)", "votes_cand_20747": "\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_20748": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0631\u0648\u0631 \u062c\u0645\u0639\u0629 \u0628\u0634\u0627\u0631\u0647 ( Justice Party - JP)", "votes_cand_20750": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0633\u064a\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u062f\u0631\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (Working Forces Alliance Party - WFAP)", "votes_cand_20752": "\u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u0641\u0649 \u0631\u062d\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0623\u062f\u0645 \u062f / \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_20754": "\u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u062a\u0627\u0645\u0648\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0649  \u0639\u0644\u0649 (United National Sudanese Party - UNSP)", "votes_cand_20755": "\u0633\u0646\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0649 \u0628\u0648\u0644\u0633 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0634\u0645\u0639\u0648\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_20756": "\u062f\u064a\u0646\u0642 \u0643\u0648\u064a\u0644 \u0643\u0644\u064a\u062a\u0648 \u062c\u0648\u0632\u064a\u0641 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_20757": "\u0635\u0627\u0641\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0643\u0631\u0649 \u062c\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0629 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0642\u0649 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_20759": "\u0627\u0648\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_20760": "\u062d\u0631\u0628\u0647 \u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f \u0646\u0633\u064a\u0645 \u0642\u0627\u0633\u0645 (Free Sudanese National Party - FSNP)", "votes_cand_20762": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0647\u0627\u0634\u0645 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20763": "\u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Justice National Party - JNP)", "votes_cand_20769": "\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u0628\u0648\u0639\u0627\u0642\u0644\u0629 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u064a\u062f\u0631 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_20771": "\u0645\u0646\u0635\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u0631\u0649 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u0646\u0627\u0644 (independent)", "votes_cand_20772": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20773": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0642\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_20774": "\u0627\u0644\u0641\u0643\u0649 \u0627\u064a\u0648\u0628 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0632\u0647\u064a\u0631 ( Socialist Mayoist Union Organization - SMUO)", "votes_cand_20776": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_20778": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_20779": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062e\u062a\u0627\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f \u0645\u062e\u062a\u0627\u0631 ( Advancement and Social Justice Party - ASJP)", "votes_cand_20780": "\u0627\u0644\u0639\u062a\u0628\u0627\u0646\u0649 \u0645\u062a\u0648\u0644\u0649 \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u063a\u0627\u0632\u0649 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_20782": "\u0631\u0627\u0636\u0649 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0647\u0627\u0634\u0645 ( Nile Valley Unity Party - NVUP)", "votes_cand_20784": "\u0639\u0648\u0636\u0648\u0646 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0641\u062a\u0627\u062d (independent)", "votes_cand_20786": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0635\u0627\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_20788": "\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0644 \u0645\u0647\u062f\u0649 \u0637\u0647 \u0639\u0644\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_20790": "\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u0627\u0631\u064a \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0645\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_20792": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20793": "\u062d\u0633\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u062f\u0641\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0635\u0627\u0641\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (Working Forces Alliance Party - WFAP)", "votes_cand_20795": "\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u0643\u0649 \u0641\u062a\u062d\u0649 ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_20798": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0648\u062f\u0627\u0639\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_20801": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062f\u0641\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0643\u0645\u0627\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20802": "\u0627\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_20803": "\u0627\u0628\u0648 \u0632\u064a\u062f \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0648 \u0632\u064a\u062f ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_20804": "\u0627\u0628\u0634\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u0648\u0624\u0641 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0645\u064a\u0633\u0631 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_20806": "\u062c\u0645\u0627\u0639 \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u062c\u0645\u0627\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f (Umma, Collective Leadership Party - UCLP)", "votes_cand_20809": "\u0628\u064a\u0648\u0645\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0641\u0631\u064a\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Sudanese Congress Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_20812": "\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0631\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u062c\u0648\u0628 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_20813": "\u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_20814": "\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_20815": "\u0627\u0628\u0648 \u0634\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u062c\u0639\u0641\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0633\u0627\u0646 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_20816": "\u0627\u0644\u0643\u0628\u0627\u0634\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_20817": "\u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062e\u064a\u0631 \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_20819": "\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0639\u0648\u0636 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20821": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0639\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0639\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_20822": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0648\u0644\u064a\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_20824": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062a\u064a\u0642 \u0639\u0627\u0637\u0641 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_20826": "\u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u0631\u063a\u0646\u0649 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_20828": "\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0633\u064a\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u062d\u0633\u0646 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_20831": "\u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0628\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0647\u0634\u0627\u0645 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_20833": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_20835": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0645\u0633\u0627\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Umma Nationalist Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20837": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0628\u0643\u0631 ( National Renaissance Party - NRP)", "votes_cand_20839": "\u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0639\u0632 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0646\u062f\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_20841": "\u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0634\u0645\u0627\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u0649 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_20843": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (East Democratic Party - EDP)", "votes_cand_20845": "\u0627\u0644\u0628\u062f\u0631\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062f . \u0647\u0627\u0634\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_20847": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a \u0645\u0647\u062f\u0649 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_20851": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u062f\u0649 (Umma, Collective Leadership Party - UCLP)", "votes_cand_20853": "\u0643\u0648\u0645\u0649 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u062b\u0631\u064a\u0627 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_20856": "\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u0631\u063a\u0646\u0649 \u0639\u0644\u0649 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_20857": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0644\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0639\u0627\u062f\u0644 ( National Reform Party - NRP)", "votes_cand_20858": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0628\u0631\u0648\u0641\u064a\u0633\u0648\u0631 / \u0641\u064a\u0635\u0644 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20859": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062e\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062a\u0627\u062c \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0631 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_20860": "\u0633\u064a\u062f \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0641\u064a\u0635\u0644 (United Democratic Unionist  (United) - UDUP)", "votes_cand_20861": "\u0642\u0628\u0644\u0629 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0645\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_20862": "\u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0642\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0637\u0647 (independent)", "votes_cand_20863": "\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0642\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0648\u0627\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_20864": "\u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0627\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_20865": "\u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0625\u0633\u0645\u0640\u0640\u0640\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u062e\u0645\u064a\u0633 \u0633\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u062a\u0645 (United National Sudanese Party - UNSP)", "votes_cand_20866": "\u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0643\u0648\u0645\u0649 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u0649 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_20867": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062f\u0627\u0624\u0648\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0643\u0631\u0645 ( Umma Nationalist Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20868": "\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u062c\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_20869": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0644 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0641\u062e\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20870": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u062c\u0627\u0628\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0647 ( Socialist Mayoist Union Organization - SMUO)", "votes_cand_20871": "\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0646\u064a\u0644 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20872": "\u062f\u0641\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u0639\u0627\u0648\u064a\u0629 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_20873": "\u0627\u0633\u062d\u0627\u0642 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20874": "\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0644  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u0633\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_20875": "\u062c\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0644 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u062c\u0645\u0639\u0647 \u0646\u0645\u064a\u0631\u0649 (United National Sudanese Party - UNSP)", "votes_cand_20876": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_20878": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u064a \u062e\u0648\u062c\u0644\u064a \u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (United Democratic Unionist  (United) - UDUP)", "votes_cand_20879": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0645\u0631 ( National Reform Party - NRP)", "votes_cand_20882": "\u0627\u062c\u0627\u0646\u0642 \u0627\u0643\u0648\u0627\u0646\u062c \u0627\u0634\u0648\u0627\u0646\u062c ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_20892": "\u0627\u0646\u062f\u064a\u0629 \u0633\u0627\u0645\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0643\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u064a\u0632 (United National Sudanese Party - UNSP)", "votes_cand_20909": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u062f\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 (Umma, Collective Leadership Party - UCLP)", "votes_cand_20910": "\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u064a\u062f (Umma, Collective Leadership Party - UCLP)", "votes_cand_20914": "\u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0634\u0645\u0628\u0627\u062a\u064a (Umma, Collective Leadership Party - UCLP)", "votes_cand_20922": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0647\u0627\u0628 \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0646\u0633 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20923": "\u0628\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0644\u0627\u062c \u0633\u0644\u0627\u0645 (White Banner Party - WBP)", "votes_cand_20924": "\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (independent)", "votes_cand_20925": "\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0631\u0632\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_20926": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645  \u062e\u0644\u064a\u0644  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_20927": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0643\u0633\u0627\u0648\u0649 \u062d\u0628\u064a\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u064a\u0627\u0633\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_20928": "\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0634\u064a\u062e \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0627\u0646\u0648\u0631 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_20929": "\u0643\u0628\u0627\u0634\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u0645\u0648 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0648\u0645 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_20930": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645  \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u064a\u0627\u0633\u0631 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_20931": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u0633\u0648\u0644 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_20932": "\u0641\u0631\u062d \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0636\u0631 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_20933": "\u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0639\u0641\u064a\u0641\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0639\u0641\u064a\u0641\u0649 (Umma, Collective Leadership Party - UCLP)", "votes_cand_20934": "\u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_20935": "\u0646\u0645\u0631 \u062a\u0627\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u063a\u0627\u0626\u0628 \u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f (United National Sudanese Party - UNSP)", "votes_cand_20941": "\u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u062e\u0645\u064a\u0633 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( United Democratic Salvation Front \u2013 UDSFP/M)", "votes_cand_20944": "\u0643\u064a\u0644\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0646\u0645\u0631 \u0646\u0627\u0635\u0631 \u0644\u064a\u0644\u0649 (Peoples  Forces for Rights and Democracy - PFRD)", "votes_cand_21736": "\u0645\u0646\u0645\u064a \u0642\u0644\u0648\u0627\u0643 \u062a\u0648\u062a (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_21737": "\u0644\u0648\u0627\u0644 \u0644\u064a\u0645 \u062a\u0648\u064a\u0644 \u0648\u0644\u064a\u0645 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_21738": "\u0642\u0631\u062c\u064a\u0643 \u0643\u0648\u064a\u0646\u0647 \u0627\u0633\u062a\u064a\u0641\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_21739": "\u0628\u0627\u0638 \u0648\u0627\u0646\u0642 \u0645\u0627\u062b\u064a\u0648 (independent)", "votes_cand_21740": "\u0645\u062f\u0648\u062a \u0642\u0627\u0646\u062c \u0642\u062f\u064a\u062a (independent)", "votes_cand_21744": "Golnam Chier Monyping Ramzi ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_21745": "Kamic Marial Luac Abraham (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_21746": "Bol Aru Yar Monica (United Democratic Salvation Front - UDSFP)", "votes_cand_21747": "Gony  Bol Dhuor Sulieman (African National Congress - ANC)", "votes_cand_21748": "Machol Riak Mayinde Matur ( National Justice Movement Party - NJMP)", "votes_cand_21749": "Riak Chinor Makuac Makur (United Sudanese African Party - USAP)", "votes_cand_21750": "Adam Abdalla Abdalaziz Raja (independent)", "votes_cand_21751": "Adhiac Beny Kot Bullen ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_21752": "Amou Reec Anyieth Macuor (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_21753": "Thon  Dhuol Makuong Nekamiahia (African National Congress - ANC)", "votes_cand_21754": "Achiek Chep Chuot Madol ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_21755": "Maliet  Matuet Dhieu Daniel ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_21756": "Reec Abergut Manyang Peter (African National Congress - ANC)", "votes_cand_21757": "Machik Alajabo Julla Gibriel (Sudanese African United Party - SANU)", "votes_cand_21758": "Ngong Arop Malual Martin (independent)", "votes_cand_21759": "Yom  Riak Maliet Alembany ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_21760": "Nak Deng Majuec Paul (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_21761": "Bol Aru Samuel Margaret (Sudanese African United Party - SANU)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": ["emb_participants_exceed_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_participants", "emb_ballot_reconciliation_fail", "emb_in_box_exceeds_registered", "emb_in_box_exceeds_participants", "emb_discrepancy_mismatch", "emb_vote_total_mismatch", "emb_over_95pct_share", "emb_in_box_exceeds_legal_max", "emb_participants_box_difference_over_5pct"], "emb_flag_map": {"emb_participants_exceed_registered": "participants_exceed_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_registered": "issued_exceeds_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_participants": "issued_exceeds_participants", "emb_ballot_reconciliation_fail": "ballot_reconciliation_fail", "emb_in_box_exceeds_registered": "in_box_exceeds_registered", "emb_in_box_exceeds_participants": "in_box_exceeds_participants", "emb_discrepancy_mismatch": "discrepancy_mismatch", "emb_vote_total_mismatch": "vote_total_mismatch", "emb_over_95pct_share": "over_95pct_share", "emb_in_box_exceeds_legal_max": "in_box_exceeds_legal_max", "emb_participants_box_difference_over_5pct": "participants_box_difference_over_5pct"}, "audit_history_source": "sudan_2010_national_assembly.audit.parquet"}, "n_stations": 9896, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3353, "registered_not_positive": 38, "cast_gt_registered": 37, "invalid_gt_cast": 103, "votes_gt_valid": 237}, "n_stations_flagged": 3455, "created_at": "2026-06-04T04:46:57.445086", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 9896, "n_distinct_geometry": 24, "quality_index": 1.34, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.82, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.213, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.066, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.34, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.404, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.14, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.213, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.213, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.066, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.066, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.07, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.106, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.106, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "National Congress", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "SPLM", "margin": 49.61, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SDN", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"quarantined": 853, "excluded": 131, "recount": 3, "final": 8909}, "flag_dictionary": {"participants_exceed_registered": "The number of participating voters is higher than the number of registered voters", "issued_exceeds_registered": "The number of ballots issued to voters is higher than the number of registered voters.", "issued_exceeds_participants": "The number of ballots issued to voters is higher than the number of participating voters.", "ballot_reconciliation_fail": "The total number of Ballots issued to voters does not equal the number of ballots received minus the number of spoiled and unused ballots", "in_box_exceeds_registered": "The total number of votes in the ballot box is higher than the number of registered voters. ", "in_box_exceeds_participants": "The total number of votes in the ballot box is higher than the number of participating voters. ", "discrepancy_mismatch": "The record discrepancy (F) does not equal the number of ballots issued to voters minus the total of ballots found in the box.", "vote_total_mismatch": "The total number of votes in the ballot box does not equal the total votes obtained by candidates plus the total number of invalid votes.", "over_95pct_share": "Unusual number of votes in the Polling Station (recommendation:  >95% of votes going to one candidate for more than 500 votes)", "in_box_exceeds_legal_max": "Number of Ballots found in the Box is equal or greater than the maximum authorized (1000 for Southern States, 1200 for Northern States)", "participants_box_difference_over_5pct": "Number of voters who participated in the voting is not different to 5% to the number of Ballots found in the Box"}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": true}, {"id": "cac5a4f1501b43a5b69e6e0830ca8d3f", "name": "Sudan 2010 \u2014 Candidates to Southern Sudan Legislative Assembly", "metadata": {"country": "Sudan", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Built from NEC SQL Server backups (2010-05-03) restored locally. Source DB: ElectionsResult. Tables: FinalCentersResults + CandidatesVotesObtained + Candidates + Parties + States + constituency tables. Includes full ballot-flow accounting (received, spoiled, unused, issued, in_box, discrepancy) alongside vote tallies \u2014 uniquely rich for forensics. Pre-South-Sudan-secession: 25 northern states + 10 southern states (later \u2192 South Sudan via 2011 referendum).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_cand_15525": "Miakol Aluong Chuang Gier ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15526": "Ruea Kok James ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15527": "Tut Chol Tot Timothy ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15529": "Jaak Wuol Jok Mary (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_15530": "Wur Kic Nyang Martin (Sudanese African United Party - SANU)", "votes_cand_15532": "Abo Ahmad Alnur Ahmad (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_15533": "Luk Thiyang Kueth David (independent)", "votes_cand_15534": "Tutdel Dhor Mario Michael (independent)", "votes_cand_15535": "Juoc Bol Abui Stephen (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_15536": "Thon Yong Wieu Malok (independent)", "votes_cand_15537": "Both Deng John (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_15538": "Diet Gatwich Palet Johnson (independent)", "votes_cand_15540": "Unango Abdalla Thomas Luciano (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_15541": "Chany Ret Nyaulang Mary ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15542": "Nyoap Deng Gatjieth William ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_15543": "Luak Gor Hoth ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_15544": "Changath Ruach Kach John (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_15545": "Farajalla Saeed Rizig Awad (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_15546": "Chol Jok John ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15547": "Duany Mai Wal ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_15550": "Jok Luk John ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15552": "Banak Sigin James ( United Democratic Salvation Front \u2013 UDSFP/M)", "votes_cand_15553": "Gilo Abdrobo Mohamed (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_15554": "Gora Akway  Okwier David ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15555": "Gil Bayak Kutin ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15557": "Dapka Musa Alamin Ramadan ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15558": "Yanga Wanji Arkangelo Bari ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15560": "Kuich Duop Gatkuoth (independent)", "votes_cand_15561": "Bilieth Yien David ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15562": "Bol Duol Hoth Simon (independent)", "votes_cand_15563": "Koryom Dok Yoal Gabriel (independent)", "votes_cand_15564": "Bil Benjamin Marial Barnaba ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15565": "Deng Dau Deng ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15566": "Macuar Mayuot Mathuc Elias ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15567": "Deng Ketch Chol John (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_15568": "Biowei Chol Philip (independent)", "votes_cand_15569": "Deng Leek Thon Philip ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15570": "Nak Thel  Nak Majok (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_15572": "Ahamed Musa Mahammed Ahamed ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15573": "Kur Ayuen Dengtiel ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15574": "Patirit Marial Daniel (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_15578": "Mayen Deng Leek Mabior (United Sudanese African Party - USAP)", "votes_cand_15584": "Adam Ali Adam Ismaeil (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_15587": "Makuei Lueth Makuei Michael ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15589": "Ayom Alier Elijah (independent)", "votes_cand_15590": "Alier Malek Benjamin ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15591": "Nguany Deng Akon Ayuen (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_15593": "Nayzo Njbra John George (African National Congress - ANC)", "votes_cand_15594": "Angou Lokurnyang Francis ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15596": "Bureth Ogut James ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_15599": "Gangu Irer Aruk David ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15600": "Cholil Lukaye Thabalang Philip (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_15602": "Mabor Aciek Kot Philip (African National Congress - ANC)", "votes_cand_15613": "Kiba Arkol Fotur Peter (African National Congress - ANC)", "votes_cand_15666": "Lisan Amadeo Adu Joseph ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_15676": "Matuic Ubur Majok Santino (Sudanese African United Party - SANU)", "votes_cand_15689": "Uku Kangandi Andrea John (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_15698": "Upio Uchalla Paulino Ugudo (National United Democratic Front -NUDF)", "votes_cand_15703": "yeru Bolo Richard Arkangelo (National United Democratic Front -NUDF)", "votes_cand_15711": "Abdella Jabriel Musa Abdu ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_15712": "Sobeyan Maskhur Fatur Ramadan ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_15713": "Yak Lual Jervase Constantine (United Sudanese African Party - USAP)", "votes_cand_15714": "Ukelo Modesto Wol Joseph ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_15715": "Mohammed Musa Issa Mohammed (independent)", "votes_cand_15718": "Ugbede Jabakana Peter William (independent)", "votes_cand_15719": "Madut Uyu Mayar Clement (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_15780": "Ater  Wantok Mon Dr. Amon (independent)", "votes_cand_15781": "Thuou Akot Awet Daniel ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15785": "Mager Muorwal Mager Joseph (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_15787": "Kachuol Malek Matur Gabriel (Sudanese African United Party - SANU)", "votes_cand_15789": "Mon Monydit Deng Daniel ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15790": "Mayup Biet Muoranyar Peter (independent)", "votes_cand_15792": "Gol Makuer Matur  Zakaria ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15793": "Gaak Malooc Angui Paul (African National Congress - ANC)", "votes_cand_15794": "Manok Dhok Madol Benjamin (independent)", "votes_cand_15795": "Manyiel Deng Malual Simon ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15796": "Mayen Manyiel Mayen Henry (African National Congress - ANC)", "votes_cand_15797": "Machek Alajabo Machek Andrew (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_15798": "Riak Akec Mayom Paul ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15799": "Puou Manyuon Mabor Gabriel (African National Congress - ANC)", "votes_cand_15800": "Mathiec Mayuen Liech Lazaro (United Sudanese African Party - USAP)", "votes_cand_15801": "Tieng Dut Mading Yuot (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_15802": "Maciel Mading Majok Cirillo (independent)", "votes_cand_15804": "Athong Tut Matot Gordon ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15805": "Deng Malou Dharuai Job (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_15807": "Cinweng  Deng Marial Dr. Achol (independent)", "votes_cand_15808": "Mabor Dak Machar Nyithak (Sudanese African United Party - SANU)", "votes_cand_15809": "Ajuac Along Awerial Parmena ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15810": "Arok Awan Mon Farag (African National Congress - ANC)", "votes_cand_15812": "Jok Ater Jok Benjamin (African National Congress - ANC)", "votes_cand_15895": "Mok Diew puok Koang (independent)", "votes_cand_16215": "Juch Taban  Timothy (independent)", "votes_cand_16216": "Kuoth Hoth Dop Moses (independent)", "votes_cand_16228": "Nak Chiman Gai  Samuel ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_16443": "Dhieu Mathok Diing Wol (independent)", "votes_cand_16444": "Mading Dau Geng Bol (independent)", "votes_cand_16447": "Ngong Deng Gum ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16448": "Geng Diing Gum Geng (United Sudanese African Party - USAP)", "votes_cand_16449": "Abdslkrim Malek Garang Kur (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_16467": "Agiu Agiu Thiep Bol ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16468": "Elias Ngong Ngong Gau (African National Congress - ANC)", "votes_cand_16469": "Geng Khon Bol Khon (United Sudanese African Party - USAP)", "votes_cand_16470": "Thomas Mou Kuan Adim (independent)", "votes_cand_16579": "MARING IGGA WANI JAMES ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16580": "MONOJA LODU TOMBEKANA LUKA ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16581": "KWAJOK ROMBE LADO TONGUN ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16582": "HAKIM ELUZAI KWAJE JOY ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16583": "DANIEL JUMI LOGALE PAUL ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16584": "LONGORO ONESIMO MOSES BIDALI ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16585": "KAPE MUKHTAR MATHEW ISMAIL ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16586": "MOMO DANGA STEPHEN HENERY ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16587": "KWORI DUKU JANKA JAMES ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16588": "LO LISI LO LIPO WANI BRAMATALI ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16589": "LEGGE KEDIA LAKU PAULINO ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16590": "MUREIN MALAU ALI JUMA ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16591": "LOGWONGA PETER LASU REMIJO ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16610": "JOKO MILLA LEMI JIMMY ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16614": "LADO WANI JOSEPH JAMES ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_16615": "LAKU PAUL BYEBYE KAMILO ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_16620": "JUSTIN KAZANI LAKU SIMON ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_16621": "GORE MODI AUGUSTINO MIRIELA ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_16622": "LANYAWA SEI  LASU NIMLASUAYA ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_16623": "LOGULOMO ZAKAYO LUKUDU DENIS ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_16624": "JIGUA WATA ARINGO NICOLA ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_16625": "JACKSON KENYI SAMUEL SWORO ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_16626": "WURBE YOASA SANYA SALUWEN ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_16642": "GONGU PAUL KOLONG SABINA ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_16643": "LAKU JALAL JAMES TOWONGO ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_16970": "Arop Madut Arop ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16971": "Deng Wek Kiir (Sudanese African United Party - SANU)", "votes_cand_16972": "Nyuol Garang Bona (independent)", "votes_cand_16973": "Buong Maming Bol Victor ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_16974": "Deng Mayom Kuany ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16975": "Nyuol Mayath Deng Nyuol (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_16976": "Majok Biajo Margrate (Sudanese African National Union - SANU)", "votes_cand_16977": "Aler Majak Charles ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16978": "Atem Majur Duot Dhal (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_16979": "Kondok Deng Muon Deng ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_16980": "Majok Yak Majok ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_16981": "Dut Deng Aguek Aron ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_16982": "SURUR NDEKE ELUIDA AWUTU ( United Democratic Salvation Front \u2013 UDSFP/M)", "votes_cand_16983": "WOJA BABA MOGGA GABRIEL ( United Democratic Salvation Front \u2013 UDSFP/M)", "votes_cand_16984": "SWAKA WANI SARAFINO (United Sudanese African Party - USAP)", "votes_cand_16985": "BIOMUKE LAKU KUMBA SEMAYA (United Sudanese African Party - USAP)", "votes_cand_16988": "WANI MIJI WONGO JUMMY (United Sudanese African Party - USAP)", "votes_cand_16992": "BUNDUKI IBRAHIM RAJAB SALAH (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_16996": "LOKOSA YUGU JOHN CHRISTO (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_17000": "JADA ELUNAI WURI ISAAC (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_17002": "WAJA KENYI BEN OKETTA (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_17003": "LOGWRONG KAJOKEJI EASA SALIM (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_17004": "BERO WANI LAKU OSMAN (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_17005": "GORGI DIYO PUDU ADAM (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_17006": "BABA YUASA LASU JAMES (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_17007": "LOBOKA SAMSON PITA MARGRET (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_17010": "SULIMAN SAAID SULIMAN ISMAIL ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_17012": "LADO JADA WANI STANSLAUS ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_17019": "TATA AMANI BARNABA MARGRET ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_17021": "YOUNIS ABE ALIGO MARTIN ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_17024": "MAJURO LAKU UMBA WILLIAM ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_17025": "LAKU MANYARA PITIA ABRAHAM ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_17026": "LOBORONG CEAZARIO AKAKI ALEX ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_17027": "YANGA LOMURO ELIA MARTIN ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_17028": "ADHA KAMONDE JUMA SCOPAS (independent)", "votes_cand_17029": "GALI JAKE WANI LEMI (independent)", "votes_cand_17030": "MARANG GWAKI BARAJA WORI (independent)", "votes_cand_17031": "ADAWO MABE ANDRAGA SAVERIO (independent)", "votes_cand_17032": "LOSSO DONGA ALIGO MANOAH (independent)", "votes_cand_17033": "MOZUWIRI KUMAMA NDOROMO NDOLE (independent)", "votes_cand_17034": "LEJU LOGO MULUKWAT LEONARD (independent)", "votes_cand_17035": "ABURAMA DIMA JIBI SCOPAS (independent)", "votes_cand_17036": "KIMBO YAKOBO KIDEN MARY (independent)", "votes_cand_17037": "LUGOR LAKU LORI YATTA (independent)", "votes_cand_17038": "WILLIAM PHANUEL KWAJE JOHN (independent)", "votes_cand_17039": "PAI PAI BENJAMIN LUGALLA GEORGE (Sudanese African United Party - SANU)", "votes_cand_17040": "AKO GURAK TABAN AUGUSTINO (independent)", "votes_cand_17049": "Yak Garang Dr. Omer ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_17054": "Duwar Deng Duwar Samuel ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_17055": "Kuel Deng Lual James ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_17056": "Mawien Deng But Bona (independent)", "votes_cand_17057": "Jong Majong Machok ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_17058": "Reng Kuot Deng Kuot ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_17059": "Aduot Aleu Ayieny Aleu ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_17060": "Akoc Majok Akoc Wol (Sudanese African United Party - SANU)", "votes_cand_17061": "Majang Chol Wol William (African National Congress - ANC)", "votes_cand_17062": "Ariik Dhor Mawien Kornelio ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_17063": "Anyuon Madut Majan Deng (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_17064": "Machar Parek Maduot Dr. Toby (Sudanese African National Union - SANU)", "votes_cand_17065": "Muorwel Dut Majok ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_17066": "Lat Manyuon Mangong (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_17067": "Deng Nhial Deng Nhial ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_17068": "Tiel Athian Tiel Malual (African National Congress - ANC)", "votes_cand_17069": "Adhal Longar Lual ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_17070": "Anhiernyin Mapuor Saleman (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_17092": "\u0645\u062c\u0627\u0643 \u0645\u0631\u064a\u0627\u0644 \u064a\u0627\u0633\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_17093": "\u0623\u064a\u0648\u064a\u0644 \u0645\u0646\u064a\u0644 \u0631\u064a\u0643 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_17094": "\u062f\u064a\u0646\u0642 \u0627\u062c\u0648\u0627\u062c \u0627\u0644\u0628\u064a\u0646\u0648 (independent)", "votes_cand_17096": "\u0645\u0634\u0627\u0631 \u0645\u0627\u062c\u064a\u0637 \u0645\u0627\u0648\u064a\u0646 (United Sudanese African Party - USAP)", "votes_cand_17097": "\u0645\u0643\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u0646\u062c\u0631\u0648\u0631 \u0628\u0637\u0627\u0631\u064a\u0629 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_17098": "\u062f\u064a\u0646\u0642 \u0628\u0648\u0644 \u0632\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0627 (independent)", "votes_cand_17099": "\u0645\u0627\u062a\u064a\u0643 \u0628\u0648\u0644 \u0633\u0627\u064a\u0645\u0648\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_17100": "\u0643\u0648\u0644\u0627\u0646\u0642 \u062f\u064a\u0648 \u0646\u064a\u0643\u0648\u0644\u0629 (independent)", "votes_cand_17101": "\u0643\u0648\u0646 \u0646\u064a\u0627\u0644 \u063a\u0631\u062f\u0648\u0646 (Sudanese African United Party - SANU)", "votes_cand_17102": "\u0643\u0627\u064a \u062f\u0627\u0643 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0631\u0627\u062c (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_17103": "\u0648\u064a\u062c\u0627\u0646\u0642 \u0645\u0646\u062a\u0648\u064a\u0644 \u062c\u0648\u0632\u064a\u0641 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_17104": "\u0648\u064a\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0627\u0644 \u0642\u0627\u062a\u0643\u0648\u0631 \u062c\u064a\u0645\u0633 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_17105": "\u062c\u0627\u0644 \u0643\u0648\u0644 \u0631\u0648\u0627\u064a ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_17106": "\u0643\u0648\u0645\u0641\u064a\u0648 \u0633\u0628\u062a \u0641\u0627\u0646\u062a\u0631\u0644\u064a\u0646\u0648 ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_17107": "\u062f\u0627\u062f\u0648\u0631 \u0648\u0648\u0631 \u0648\u0644\u064a\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_17108": "\u0631\u0648\u0636\u0627\u0644 \u062f\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0646\u0642\u0647 \u0643\u0648\u0627\u0646\u0642 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_17109": "\u062a\u0627\u0628 \u0637\u0648\u0646 \u062c\u064a\u0643\u0627\u0646\u062c (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_17110": "\u062f\u064a\u0646\u0642 \u0645\u062b\u064a\u0627\u0646\u0642 \u0645\u0627\u062b\u064a\u0648 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_17112": "\u062f\u064a\u0648 \u0645\u0648\u062a \u0645\u0627\u064a\u0643\u0644 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_17113": "\u0644\u0627\u0645 \u0643\u0648\u064a\u062b \u062c\u064a\u0645\u0633 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_17114": "\u0647\u0648\u062b \u0643\u0627\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_17115": "\u0644\u064a\u0641 \u0648\u064a\u0634 \u062f\u0627\u0643 \u0643\u0648\u0646\u0642 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_17116": "\u0637\u0648\u0627\u0646 \u062a\u0648\u0645\u0633\u0648\u0646 \u0648\u0648\u0644 (independent)", "votes_cand_17117": "\u0633\u064a\u0641 \u0645\u0646\u0642\u0648\u0627\u0644 \u0641\u064a\u062a\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_17118": "\u0646\u064a\u0627\u0644 \u062c\u0627\u0644 \u0643\u0648\u0646\u0642 \u0641\u064a\u062a\u0631 ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_17219": "Bidoy Ruot Gatnor Paul (independent)", "votes_cand_18163": "\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0645\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_18173": "\u0623\u064a\u0648\u0645 \u0646\u064a\u0627\u0644 \u062f\u064a\u0646\u0642  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_18174": "\u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0631\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f  \u064a\u0627\u0633\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_18175": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u062f\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0627\u0636\u0644  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_18176": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u062f\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_18177": "\u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646  \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u064a\u0632 (Sudanese National Alliance Party - SNAP)", "votes_cand_18178": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0641\u064a\u0638 \u0625\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0643\u0627\u0645\u0644 (independent)", "votes_cand_18180": "\u0633\u064a\u0643\u0646\u062c\u0648 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0631  \u062d\u0627\u062a\u0645 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_18181": "\u0645\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0646\u0642\u062f \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_18182": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062c\u062d\u0627 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_18183": "\u062c\u0644\u0627\u0628 \u0645\u0646\u064a\u0631  \u0634\u064a\u062e \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u0646\u064a\u0631 (New National Democratic Party - NNDP)", "votes_cand_18184": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0641\u0627\u0637\u0645\u0629 ( Socialist Democratic Union Organization -SDUO)", "votes_cand_18329": "Majok Biajo Margrate (Sudanese African United Party - SANU)", "votes_cand_18330": "Machar Parek Maduot Dr.Toby (Sudanese African United Party - SANU)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": ["emb_participants_exceed_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_participants", "emb_ballot_reconciliation_fail", "emb_in_box_exceeds_registered", "emb_in_box_exceeds_participants", "emb_discrepancy_mismatch", "emb_vote_total_mismatch", "emb_over_95pct_share", "emb_in_box_exceeds_legal_max", "emb_participants_box_difference_over_5pct"], "emb_flag_map": {"emb_participants_exceed_registered": "participants_exceed_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_registered": "issued_exceeds_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_participants": "issued_exceeds_participants", "emb_ballot_reconciliation_fail": "ballot_reconciliation_fail", "emb_in_box_exceeds_registered": "in_box_exceeds_registered", "emb_in_box_exceeds_participants": "in_box_exceeds_participants", "emb_discrepancy_mismatch": "discrepancy_mismatch", "emb_vote_total_mismatch": "vote_total_mismatch", "emb_over_95pct_share": "over_95pct_share", "emb_in_box_exceeds_legal_max": "in_box_exceeds_legal_max", "emb_participants_box_difference_over_5pct": "participants_box_difference_over_5pct"}, "audit_history_source": "sudan_2010_southern_assembly.audit.parquet"}, "n_stations": 2792, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 74, "cast_gt_registered": 16, "invalid_gt_cast": 13, "cast_valid_mismatch": 776}, "n_stations_flagged": 805, "created_at": "2026-06-04T04:41:22.917286", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2792, "n_distinct_geometry": 7, "quality_index": 1.34, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.82, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.213, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.066, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.34, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.404, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.14, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.213, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.213, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.066, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.066, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.07, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.106, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.106, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "National Congress", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "SPLM", "margin": 49.61, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SDN", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"final": 2737, "quarantined": 53, "recount": 1, "excluded": 1}, "flag_dictionary": {"participants_exceed_registered": "The number of participating voters is higher than the number of registered voters", "issued_exceeds_registered": "The number of ballots issued to voters is higher than the number of registered voters.", "issued_exceeds_participants": "The number of ballots issued to voters is higher than the number of participating voters.", "ballot_reconciliation_fail": "The total number of Ballots issued to voters does not equal the number of ballots received minus the number of spoiled and unused ballots", "in_box_exceeds_registered": "The total number of votes in the ballot box is higher than the number of registered voters. ", "in_box_exceeds_participants": "The total number of votes in the ballot box is higher than the number of participating voters. ", "discrepancy_mismatch": "The record discrepancy (F) does not equal the number of ballots issued to voters minus the total of ballots found in the box.", "vote_total_mismatch": "The total number of votes in the ballot box does not equal the total votes obtained by candidates plus the total number of invalid votes.", "over_95pct_share": "Unusual number of votes in the Polling Station (recommendation:  >95% of votes going to one candidate for more than 500 votes)", "in_box_exceeds_legal_max": "Number of Ballots found in the Box is equal or greater than the maximum authorized (1000 for Southern States, 1200 for Northern States)", "participants_box_difference_over_5pct": "Number of voters who participated in the voting is not different to 5% to the number of Ballots found in the Box"}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": true}, {"id": "00fccf37c9f34d8dace5b357c98d8059", "name": "Sudan 2010 \u2014 Party Lists to State Constituencies", "metadata": {"country": "Sudan", "year": 2010, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Built from NEC SQL Server backups (2010-05-03) restored locally. Source DB: ElectionsResult. Tables: FinalCentersResults + PartiesListVotesObtained + Parties + States + constituency tables. Includes full ballot-flow accounting (received, spoiled, unused, issued, in_box, discrepancy) alongside vote tallies \u2014 uniquely rich for forensics. Pre-South-Sudan-secession: 25 northern states + 10 southern states (later \u2192 South Sudan via 2011 referendum).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_party_8": "Congress national Party - NCP", "votes_party_9": "Peoples Congress Party - PCP", "votes_party_10": " Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP", "votes_party_12": " National Reform Party - NRP", "votes_party_14": " Democratic Unionist Party - DUP", "votes_party_15": " Umma National Party - UNP", "votes_party_16": " Umma Nationalist Party - UNP", "votes_party_17": " Socialist Democratic Union Organization -SDUO", "votes_party_18": " Umma Federal Party - UFP", "votes_party_19": "New Sudan Organization Party - NSOP", "votes_party_21": "Sudanese Congress Party - SCP", "votes_party_22": "Truth Federal Party - TFP", "votes_party_23": " Justice Party - JP", "votes_party_24": "Umma, Collective Leadership Party - UCLP", "votes_party_25": "South and North Funj  Association Party - SNFAP", "votes_party_26": "Sudanese Usoud Hurrah Party - SUHP", "votes_party_27": "United National Sudanese Party - UNSP", "votes_party_29": " Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF", "votes_party_30": " Nile Valley Unity Party - NVUP", "votes_party_32": "African National Congress - ANC", "votes_party_34": "United Sudanese Forces Party - USFP", "votes_party_35": "Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP", "votes_party_36": "Eastern Sudan Democratic Socialist Congress -ESDSCP", "votes_party_37": "Sudanese African National Union - SANU", "votes_party_38": " United Democratic Salvation Front \u2013 UDSFP/M", "votes_party_39": "United Democratic Salvation Front - UDSFP", "votes_party_41": "Peoples  Forces for Rights and Democracy - PFRD", "votes_party_42": "New National Democratic Party - NNDP", "votes_party_44": "Baath Arab Socialist Party -BASP", "votes_party_45": " Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP", "votes_party_47": "Islamic Central Party - ICP", "votes_party_48": "Bija Congress Party - BCP", "votes_party_50": " Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM", "votes_party_51": "Justice National Party - JNP", "votes_party_61": "Sudanes Revolutionary Movement Committees-SRMC", "votes_party_65": "Liberation National Party - LNP", "votes_party_66": "Sudanese African United Party - SANU", "votes_party_67": "Muslim Brothers Party - MBP", "votes_party_68": "Al Sudan Anna Party - AAP", "votes_party_69": "Funj Association National Party - FANP", "votes_party_70": "National Democratic Front Party - NDFP", "votes_party_71": "East Justice and Development Party -EJDP", "votes_party_74": " Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC", "votes_party_75": "National United Democratic Front -NUDF", "votes_party_76": " Unionist National Party - UNP", "votes_party_78": "United Democratic Unionist  (United) - UDUP", "votes_party_79": "Free Will Party - FWP", "votes_party_80": " National Renaissance Party - NRP", "votes_party_81": "Peoples Movement for Democratic Rights - PMDR", "votes_party_83": "East Democratic Party - EDP", "votes_party_84": " United Democratic Party - UDP", "votes_party_87": "National Liberation Party - NLP", "votes_party_88": " United Democratic Front - UDF", "votes_party_93": "Sudanese National Alliance Party - SNAP", "votes_party_94": "Sudanese National Front Organization - SNFO", "votes_party_95": "Sudanese National Labour Party - SNLP", "votes_party_96": "Islamic National Front Party - INF", "votes_party_101": " Sudanese Communist Party - SCP", "votes_party_102": " Umma Party - UP", "votes_party_103": "United Sudanese African Party - USAP", "votes_party_104": "Sudanese Solidarity Democratic Party - SSDP", "votes_party_106": "National Peoples Alliance Party - NPAP", "votes_party_107": " Arab Socialist Naserist Party - ASNP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": ["emb_participants_exceed_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_participants", "emb_ballot_reconciliation_fail", "emb_in_box_exceeds_registered", "emb_in_box_exceeds_participants", "emb_discrepancy_mismatch", "emb_vote_total_mismatch", "emb_over_95pct_share", "emb_in_box_exceeds_legal_max", "emb_participants_box_difference_over_5pct"], "emb_flag_map": {"emb_participants_exceed_registered": "participants_exceed_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_registered": "issued_exceeds_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_participants": "issued_exceeds_participants", "emb_ballot_reconciliation_fail": "ballot_reconciliation_fail", "emb_in_box_exceeds_registered": "in_box_exceeds_registered", "emb_in_box_exceeds_participants": "in_box_exceeds_participants", "emb_discrepancy_mismatch": "discrepancy_mismatch", "emb_vote_total_mismatch": "vote_total_mismatch", "emb_over_95pct_share": "over_95pct_share", "emb_in_box_exceeds_legal_max": "in_box_exceeds_legal_max", "emb_participants_box_difference_over_5pct": "participants_box_difference_over_5pct"}, "audit_history_source": "sudan_2010_party_list_state.audit.parquet"}, "n_stations": 9665, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 49, "invalid_gt_cast": 92, "cast_valid_mismatch": 3492, "registered_not_positive": 40, "votes_gt_valid": 598}, "n_stations_flagged": 3768, "created_at": "2026-06-04T04:40:30.719874", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 9665, "n_distinct_geometry": 21, "quality_index": 1.34, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.82, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.213, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.066, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.34, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.404, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.14, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.213, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.213, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.066, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.066, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.07, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.106, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.106, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "National Congress", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "SPLM", "margin": 49.61, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SDN", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"final": 8698, "excluded": 24, "recount": 3, "quarantined": 940}, "flag_dictionary": {"participants_exceed_registered": "The number of participating voters is higher than the number of registered voters", "issued_exceeds_registered": "The number of ballots issued to voters is higher than the number of registered voters.", "issued_exceeds_participants": "The number of ballots issued to voters is higher than the number of participating voters.", "ballot_reconciliation_fail": "The total number of Ballots issued to voters does not equal the number of ballots received minus the number of spoiled and unused ballots", "in_box_exceeds_registered": "The total number of votes in the ballot box is higher than the number of registered voters. ", "in_box_exceeds_participants": "The total number of votes in the ballot box is higher than the number of participating voters. ", "discrepancy_mismatch": "The record discrepancy (F) does not equal the number of ballots issued to voters minus the total of ballots found in the box.", "vote_total_mismatch": "The total number of votes in the ballot box does not equal the total votes obtained by candidates plus the total number of invalid votes.", "over_95pct_share": "Unusual number of votes in the Polling Station (recommendation:  >95% of votes going to one candidate for more than 500 votes)", "in_box_exceeds_legal_max": "Number of Ballots found in the Box is equal or greater than the maximum authorized (1000 for Southern States, 1200 for Northern States)", "participants_box_difference_over_5pct": "Number of voters who participated in the voting is not different to 5% to the number of Ballots found in the Box"}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": true}, {"id": "066e2efc4eb6463f830f12ab0374f49c", "name": "Sudan 2010 \u2014 Party Lists to National Constituencies", "metadata": {"country": "Sudan", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Built from NEC SQL Server backups (2010-05-03) restored locally. Source DB: ElectionsResult. Tables: FinalCentersResults + PartiesListVotesObtained + Parties + States + constituency tables. Includes full ballot-flow accounting (received, spoiled, unused, issued, in_box, discrepancy) alongside vote tallies \u2014 uniquely rich for forensics. Pre-South-Sudan-secession: 25 northern states + 10 southern states (later \u2192 South Sudan via 2011 referendum).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_party_8": "Congress national Party - NCP", "votes_party_9": "Peoples Congress Party - PCP", "votes_party_10": " Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP", "votes_party_11": " Advancement and Social Justice Party - ASJP", "votes_party_12": " National Reform Party - NRP", "votes_party_14": " Democratic Unionist Party - DUP", "votes_party_15": " Umma National Party - UNP", "votes_party_16": " Umma Nationalist Party - UNP", "votes_party_17": " Socialist Democratic Union Organization -SDUO", "votes_party_18": " Umma Federal Party - UFP", "votes_party_19": "New Sudan Organization Party - NSOP", "votes_party_21": "Sudanese Congress Party - SCP", "votes_party_22": "Truth Federal Party - TFP", "votes_party_23": " Justice Party - JP", "votes_party_24": "Umma, Collective Leadership Party - UCLP", "votes_party_25": "South and North Funj  Association Party - SNFAP", "votes_party_26": "Sudanese Usoud Hurrah Party - SUHP", "votes_party_27": "United National Sudanese Party - UNSP", "votes_party_28": "Working Forces Alliance Party - WFAP", "votes_party_29": " Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF", "votes_party_30": " Nile Valley Unity Party - NVUP", "votes_party_32": "African National Congress - ANC", "votes_party_34": "United Sudanese Forces Party - USFP", "votes_party_35": "Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP", "votes_party_36": "Eastern Sudan Democratic Socialist Congress -ESDSCP", "votes_party_37": "Sudanese African National Union - SANU", "votes_party_38": " United Democratic Salvation Front \u2013 UDSFP/M", "votes_party_39": "United Democratic Salvation Front - UDSFP", "votes_party_41": "Peoples  Forces for Rights and Democracy - PFRD", "votes_party_42": "New National Democratic Party - NNDP", "votes_party_44": "Baath Arab Socialist Party -BASP", "votes_party_45": " Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP", "votes_party_47": "Islamic Central Party - ICP", "votes_party_48": "Bija Congress Party - BCP", "votes_party_50": " Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM", "votes_party_51": "Justice National Party - JNP", "votes_party_61": "Sudanes Revolutionary Movement Committees-SRMC", "votes_party_65": "Liberation National Party - LNP", "votes_party_66": "Sudanese African United Party - SANU", "votes_party_67": "Muslim Brothers Party - MBP", "votes_party_68": "Al Sudan Anna Party - AAP", "votes_party_69": "Funj Association National Party - FANP", "votes_party_70": "National Democratic Front Party - NDFP", "votes_party_71": "East Justice and Development Party -EJDP", "votes_party_74": " Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC", "votes_party_75": "National United Democratic Front -NUDF", "votes_party_76": " Unionist National Party - UNP", "votes_party_78": "United Democratic Unionist  (United) - UDUP", "votes_party_79": "Free Will Party - FWP", "votes_party_82": "United Democratic Front for Southern Sudan - USPF-M", "votes_party_83": "East Democratic Party - EDP", "votes_party_87": "National Liberation Party - NLP", "votes_party_88": " United Democratic Front - UDF", "votes_party_94": "Sudanese National Front Organization - SNFO", "votes_party_96": "Islamic National Front Party - INF", "votes_party_97": "Free Democrats Party - FDP", "votes_party_101": " Sudanese Communist Party - SCP", "votes_party_102": " Umma Party - UP", "votes_party_103": "United Sudanese African Party - USAP", "votes_party_104": "Sudanese Solidarity Democratic Party - SSDP", "votes_party_107": " Arab Socialist Naserist Party - ASNP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": ["emb_participants_exceed_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_participants", "emb_ballot_reconciliation_fail", "emb_in_box_exceeds_registered", "emb_in_box_exceeds_participants", "emb_discrepancy_mismatch", "emb_vote_total_mismatch", "emb_over_95pct_share", "emb_in_box_exceeds_legal_max", "emb_participants_box_difference_over_5pct"], "emb_flag_map": {"emb_participants_exceed_registered": "participants_exceed_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_registered": "issued_exceeds_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_participants": "issued_exceeds_participants", "emb_ballot_reconciliation_fail": "ballot_reconciliation_fail", "emb_in_box_exceeds_registered": "in_box_exceeds_registered", "emb_in_box_exceeds_participants": "in_box_exceeds_participants", "emb_discrepancy_mismatch": "discrepancy_mismatch", "emb_vote_total_mismatch": "vote_total_mismatch", "emb_over_95pct_share": "over_95pct_share", "emb_in_box_exceeds_legal_max": "in_box_exceeds_legal_max", "emb_participants_box_difference_over_5pct": "participants_box_difference_over_5pct"}, "audit_history_source": "sudan_2010_party_list_national.audit.parquet"}, "n_stations": 11152, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3749, "registered_not_positive": 52, "cast_gt_registered": 43, "invalid_gt_cast": 92, "votes_gt_valid": 359}, "n_stations_flagged": 3891, "created_at": "2026-06-04T04:39:28.854165", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 11152, "n_distinct_geometry": 24, "quality_index": 1.34, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.82, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.213, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.066, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.34, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.404, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.14, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.213, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.213, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.066, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.066, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.07, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.106, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.106, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "National Congress", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "SPLM", "margin": 49.61, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SDN", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"quarantined": 999, "excluded": 26, "recount": 6, "final": 10121}, "flag_dictionary": {"participants_exceed_registered": "The number of participating voters is higher than the number of registered voters", "issued_exceeds_registered": "The number of ballots issued to voters is higher than the number of registered voters.", "issued_exceeds_participants": "The number of ballots issued to voters is higher than the number of participating voters.", "ballot_reconciliation_fail": "The total number of Ballots issued to voters does not equal the number of ballots received minus the number of spoiled and unused ballots", "in_box_exceeds_registered": "The total number of votes in the ballot box is higher than the number of registered voters. ", "in_box_exceeds_participants": "The total number of votes in the ballot box is higher than the number of participating voters. ", "discrepancy_mismatch": "The record discrepancy (F) does not equal the number of ballots issued to voters minus the total of ballots found in the box.", "vote_total_mismatch": "The total number of votes in the ballot box does not equal the total votes obtained by candidates plus the total number of invalid votes.", "over_95pct_share": "Unusual number of votes in the Polling Station (recommendation:  >95% of votes going to one candidate for more than 500 votes)", "in_box_exceeds_legal_max": "Number of Ballots found in the Box is equal or greater than the maximum authorized (1000 for Southern States, 1200 for Northern States)", "participants_box_difference_over_5pct": "Number of voters who participated in the voting is not different to 5% to the number of Ballots found in the Box"}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": true}, {"id": "43e7aade36e4486ca77bf4fb0f92bc57", "name": "Sudan 2010 \u2014 Women Lists to National Constituencies", "metadata": {"country": "Sudan", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Built from NEC SQL Server backups (2010-05-03) restored locally. Source DB: ElectionsResult. Tables: FinalCentersResults + PartiesListVotesObtained + Parties + States + constituency tables. Includes full ballot-flow accounting (received, spoiled, unused, issued, in_box, discrepancy) alongside vote tallies \u2014 uniquely rich for forensics. Pre-South-Sudan-secession: 25 northern states + 10 southern states (later \u2192 South Sudan via 2011 referendum).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_party_8": "Congress national Party - NCP", "votes_party_9": "Peoples Congress Party - PCP", "votes_party_10": " Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP", "votes_party_11": " Advancement and Social Justice Party - ASJP", "votes_party_12": " National Reform Party - NRP", "votes_party_14": " Democratic Unionist Party - DUP", "votes_party_15": " Umma National Party - UNP", "votes_party_16": " Umma Nationalist Party - UNP", "votes_party_17": " Socialist Democratic Union Organization -SDUO", "votes_party_18": " Umma Federal Party - UFP", "votes_party_19": "New Sudan Organization Party - NSOP", "votes_party_21": "Sudanese Congress Party - SCP", "votes_party_22": "Truth Federal Party - TFP", "votes_party_23": " Justice Party - JP", "votes_party_24": "Umma, Collective Leadership Party - UCLP", "votes_party_25": "South and North Funj  Association Party - SNFAP", "votes_party_26": "Sudanese Usoud Hurrah Party - SUHP", "votes_party_27": "United National Sudanese Party - UNSP", "votes_party_28": "Working Forces Alliance Party - WFAP", "votes_party_29": " Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF", "votes_party_30": " Nile Valley Unity Party - NVUP", "votes_party_32": "African National Congress - ANC", "votes_party_34": "United Sudanese Forces Party - USFP", "votes_party_35": "Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP", "votes_party_37": "Sudanese African National Union - SANU", "votes_party_38": " United Democratic Salvation Front \u2013 UDSFP/M", "votes_party_39": "United Democratic Salvation Front - UDSFP", "votes_party_41": "Peoples  Forces for Rights and Democracy - PFRD", "votes_party_42": "New National Democratic Party - NNDP", "votes_party_45": " Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP", "votes_party_47": "Islamic Central Party - ICP", "votes_party_48": "Bija Congress Party - BCP", "votes_party_50": " Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM", "votes_party_51": "Justice National Party - JNP", "votes_party_61": "Sudanes Revolutionary Movement Committees-SRMC", "votes_party_65": "Liberation National Party - LNP", "votes_party_66": "Sudanese African United Party - SANU", "votes_party_67": "Muslim Brothers Party - MBP", "votes_party_68": "Al Sudan Anna Party - AAP", "votes_party_69": "Funj Association National Party - FANP", "votes_party_71": "East Justice and Development Party -EJDP", "votes_party_74": " Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC", "votes_party_75": "National United Democratic Front -NUDF", "votes_party_76": " Unionist National Party - UNP", "votes_party_78": "United Democratic Unionist  (United) - UDUP", "votes_party_79": "Free Will Party - FWP", "votes_party_83": "East Democratic Party - EDP", "votes_party_87": "National Liberation Party - NLP", "votes_party_88": " United Democratic Front - UDF", "votes_party_97": "Free Democrats Party - FDP", "votes_party_101": " Sudanese Communist Party - SCP", "votes_party_102": " Umma Party - UP", "votes_party_103": "United Sudanese African Party - USAP", "votes_party_104": "Sudanese Solidarity Democratic Party - SSDP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": ["emb_participants_exceed_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_participants", "emb_ballot_reconciliation_fail", "emb_in_box_exceeds_registered", "emb_in_box_exceeds_participants", "emb_discrepancy_mismatch", "emb_vote_total_mismatch", "emb_over_95pct_share", "emb_in_box_exceeds_legal_max", "emb_participants_box_difference_over_5pct"], "emb_flag_map": {"emb_participants_exceed_registered": "participants_exceed_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_registered": "issued_exceeds_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_participants": "issued_exceeds_participants", "emb_ballot_reconciliation_fail": "ballot_reconciliation_fail", "emb_in_box_exceeds_registered": "in_box_exceeds_registered", "emb_in_box_exceeds_participants": "in_box_exceeds_participants", "emb_discrepancy_mismatch": "discrepancy_mismatch", "emb_vote_total_mismatch": "vote_total_mismatch", "emb_over_95pct_share": "over_95pct_share", "emb_in_box_exceeds_legal_max": "in_box_exceeds_legal_max", "emb_participants_box_difference_over_5pct": "participants_box_difference_over_5pct"}, "audit_history_source": "sudan_2010_women_list_national.audit.parquet"}, "n_stations": 11093, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3758, "registered_not_positive": 53, "cast_gt_registered": 45, "invalid_gt_cast": 104, "votes_gt_valid": 431}, "n_stations_flagged": 3932, "created_at": "2026-06-04T04:38:28.058458", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 11093, "n_distinct_geometry": 24, "quality_index": 1.34, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.82, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.213, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.066, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.34, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.404, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.14, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.213, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.213, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.066, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.066, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.07, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.106, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.106, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "National Congress", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "SPLM", "margin": 49.61, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SDN", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"quarantined": 964, "excluded": 22, "recount": 4, "final": 10103}, "flag_dictionary": {"participants_exceed_registered": "The number of participating voters is higher than the number of registered voters", "issued_exceeds_registered": "The number of ballots issued to voters is higher than the number of registered voters.", "issued_exceeds_participants": "The number of ballots issued to voters is higher than the number of participating voters.", "ballot_reconciliation_fail": "The total number of Ballots issued to voters does not equal the number of ballots received minus the number of spoiled and unused ballots", "in_box_exceeds_registered": "The total number of votes in the ballot box is higher than the number of registered voters. ", "in_box_exceeds_participants": "The total number of votes in the ballot box is higher than the number of participating voters. ", "discrepancy_mismatch": "The record discrepancy (F) does not equal the number of ballots issued to voters minus the total of ballots found in the box.", "vote_total_mismatch": "The total number of votes in the ballot box does not equal the total votes obtained by candidates plus the total number of invalid votes.", "over_95pct_share": "Unusual number of votes in the Polling Station (recommendation:  >95% of votes going to one candidate for more than 500 votes)", "in_box_exceeds_legal_max": "Number of Ballots found in the Box is equal or greater than the maximum authorized (1000 for Southern States, 1200 for Northern States)", "participants_box_difference_over_5pct": "Number of voters who participated in the voting is not different to 5% to the number of Ballots found in the Box"}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": true}, {"id": "1af1f4eb200842d39b394770370afbcd", "name": "Sudan 2010 \u2014 Women Lists to State Constituencies", "metadata": {"country": "Sudan", "year": 2010, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Built from NEC SQL Server backups (2010-05-03) restored locally. Source DB: ElectionsResult. Tables: FinalCentersResults + PartiesListVotesObtained + Parties + States + constituency tables. Includes full ballot-flow accounting (received, spoiled, unused, issued, in_box, discrepancy) alongside vote tallies \u2014 uniquely rich for forensics. Pre-South-Sudan-secession: 25 northern states + 10 southern states (later \u2192 South Sudan via 2011 referendum).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_party_8": "Congress national Party - NCP", "votes_party_9": "Peoples Congress Party - PCP", "votes_party_10": " Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP", "votes_party_12": " National Reform Party - NRP", "votes_party_14": " Democratic Unionist Party - DUP", "votes_party_15": " Umma National Party - UNP", "votes_party_16": " Umma Nationalist Party - UNP", "votes_party_17": " Socialist Democratic Union Organization -SDUO", "votes_party_18": " Umma Federal Party - UFP", "votes_party_19": "New Sudan Organization Party - NSOP", "votes_party_21": "Sudanese Congress Party - SCP", "votes_party_22": "Truth Federal Party - TFP", "votes_party_23": " Justice Party - JP", "votes_party_24": "Umma, Collective Leadership Party - UCLP", "votes_party_25": "South and North Funj  Association Party - SNFAP", "votes_party_26": "Sudanese Usoud Hurrah Party - SUHP", "votes_party_27": "United National Sudanese Party - UNSP", "votes_party_28": "Working Forces Alliance Party - WFAP", "votes_party_29": " Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF", "votes_party_30": " Nile Valley Unity Party - NVUP", "votes_party_32": "African National Congress - ANC", "votes_party_33": "New Sudan Party - NSP", "votes_party_34": "United Sudanese Forces Party - USFP", "votes_party_35": "Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP", "votes_party_37": "Sudanese African National Union - SANU", "votes_party_38": " United Democratic Salvation Front \u2013 UDSFP/M", "votes_party_39": "United Democratic Salvation Front - UDSFP", "votes_party_41": "Peoples  Forces for Rights and Democracy - PFRD", "votes_party_42": "New National Democratic Party - NNDP", "votes_party_44": "Baath Arab Socialist Party -BASP", "votes_party_45": " Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP", "votes_party_46": " National Justice Movement Party - NJMP", "votes_party_47": "Islamic Central Party - ICP", "votes_party_48": "Bija Congress Party - BCP", "votes_party_50": " Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM", "votes_party_61": "Sudanes Revolutionary Movement Committees-SRMC", "votes_party_65": "Liberation National Party - LNP", "votes_party_66": "Sudanese African United Party - SANU", "votes_party_67": "Muslim Brothers Party - MBP", "votes_party_68": "Al Sudan Anna Party - AAP", "votes_party_69": "Funj Association National Party - FANP", "votes_party_70": "National Democratic Front Party - NDFP", "votes_party_71": "East Justice and Development Party -EJDP", "votes_party_74": " Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC", "votes_party_75": "National United Democratic Front -NUDF", "votes_party_76": " Unionist National Party - UNP", "votes_party_78": "United Democratic Unionist  (United) - UDUP", "votes_party_79": "Free Will Party - FWP", "votes_party_80": " National Renaissance Party - NRP", "votes_party_83": "East Democratic Party - EDP", "votes_party_87": "National Liberation Party - NLP", "votes_party_88": " United Democratic Front - UDF", "votes_party_94": "Sudanese National Front Organization - SNFO", "votes_party_95": "Sudanese National Labour Party - SNLP", "votes_party_97": "Free Democrats Party - FDP", "votes_party_101": " Sudanese Communist Party - SCP", "votes_party_102": " Umma Party - UP", "votes_party_103": "United Sudanese African Party - USAP", "votes_party_104": "Sudanese Solidarity Democratic Party - SSDP", "votes_party_106": "National Peoples Alliance Party - NPAP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": ["emb_participants_exceed_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_participants", "emb_ballot_reconciliation_fail", "emb_in_box_exceeds_registered", "emb_in_box_exceeds_participants", "emb_discrepancy_mismatch", "emb_vote_total_mismatch", "emb_over_95pct_share", "emb_in_box_exceeds_legal_max", "emb_participants_box_difference_over_5pct"], "emb_flag_map": {"emb_participants_exceed_registered": "participants_exceed_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_registered": "issued_exceeds_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_participants": "issued_exceeds_participants", "emb_ballot_reconciliation_fail": "ballot_reconciliation_fail", "emb_in_box_exceeds_registered": "in_box_exceeds_registered", "emb_in_box_exceeds_participants": "in_box_exceeds_participants", "emb_discrepancy_mismatch": "discrepancy_mismatch", "emb_vote_total_mismatch": "vote_total_mismatch", "emb_over_95pct_share": "over_95pct_share", "emb_in_box_exceeds_legal_max": "in_box_exceeds_legal_max", "emb_participants_box_difference_over_5pct": "participants_box_difference_over_5pct"}, "audit_history_source": "sudan_2010_women_list_state.audit.parquet"}, "n_stations": 9541, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3610, "registered_not_positive": 38, "cast_gt_registered": 34, "invalid_gt_cast": 92, "votes_gt_valid": 782}, "n_stations_flagged": 3937, "created_at": "2026-06-04T04:37:21.729003", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 9541, "n_distinct_geometry": 21, "quality_index": 1.34, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.82, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.213, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.066, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.34, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.404, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.14, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.213, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.213, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.066, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.066, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.07, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.106, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.106, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "National Congress", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "SPLM", "margin": 49.61, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SDN", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"quarantined": 846, "excluded": 26, "recount": 2, "final": 8667}, "flag_dictionary": {"participants_exceed_registered": "The number of participating voters is higher than the number of registered voters", "issued_exceeds_registered": "The number of ballots issued to voters is higher than the number of registered voters.", "issued_exceeds_participants": "The number of ballots issued to voters is higher than the number of participating voters.", "ballot_reconciliation_fail": "The total number of Ballots issued to voters does not equal the number of ballots received minus the number of spoiled and unused ballots", "in_box_exceeds_registered": "The total number of votes in the ballot box is higher than the number of registered voters. ", "in_box_exceeds_participants": "The total number of votes in the ballot box is higher than the number of participating voters. ", "discrepancy_mismatch": "The record discrepancy (F) does not equal the number of ballots issued to voters minus the total of ballots found in the box.", "vote_total_mismatch": "The total number of votes in the ballot box does not equal the total votes obtained by candidates plus the total number of invalid votes.", "over_95pct_share": "Unusual number of votes in the Polling Station (recommendation:  >95% of votes going to one candidate for more than 500 votes)", "in_box_exceeds_legal_max": "Number of Ballots found in the Box is equal or greater than the maximum authorized (1000 for Southern States, 1200 for Northern States)", "participants_box_difference_over_5pct": "Number of voters who participated in the voting is not different to 5% to the number of Ballots found in the Box"}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": true}, {"id": "909493fc8eee4c85904ac9e60dc939dc", "name": "Sudan 2010 \u2014 Women Lists to Southern Sudan Legislative Assembly", "metadata": {"country": "Sudan", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Built from NEC SQL Server backups (2010-05-03) restored locally. Source DB: ElectionsResult. Tables: FinalCentersResults + PartiesListVotesObtained + Parties + States + constituency tables. Includes full ballot-flow accounting (received, spoiled, unused, issued, in_box, discrepancy) alongside vote tallies \u2014 uniquely rich for forensics. Pre-South-Sudan-secession: 25 northern states + 10 southern states (later \u2192 South Sudan via 2011 referendum).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_party_8": "Congress national Party - NCP", "votes_party_29": " Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF", "votes_party_32": "African National Congress - ANC", "votes_party_37": "Sudanese African National Union - SANU", "votes_party_38": " United Democratic Salvation Front \u2013 UDSFP/M", "votes_party_39": "United Democratic Salvation Front - UDSFP", "votes_party_50": " Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM", "votes_party_66": "Sudanese African United Party - SANU", "votes_party_74": " Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC", "votes_party_88": " United Democratic Front - UDF", "votes_party_103": "United Sudanese African Party - USAP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": ["emb_participants_exceed_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_participants", "emb_ballot_reconciliation_fail", "emb_in_box_exceeds_registered", "emb_in_box_exceeds_participants", "emb_discrepancy_mismatch", "emb_vote_total_mismatch", "emb_over_95pct_share", "emb_in_box_exceeds_legal_max", "emb_participants_box_difference_over_5pct"], "emb_flag_map": {"emb_participants_exceed_registered": "participants_exceed_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_registered": "issued_exceeds_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_participants": "issued_exceeds_participants", "emb_ballot_reconciliation_fail": "ballot_reconciliation_fail", "emb_in_box_exceeds_registered": "in_box_exceeds_registered", "emb_in_box_exceeds_participants": "in_box_exceeds_participants", "emb_discrepancy_mismatch": "discrepancy_mismatch", "emb_vote_total_mismatch": "vote_total_mismatch", "emb_over_95pct_share": "over_95pct_share", "emb_in_box_exceeds_legal_max": "in_box_exceeds_legal_max", "emb_participants_box_difference_over_5pct": "participants_box_difference_over_5pct"}, "audit_history_source": "sudan_2010_women_list_southern_assembly.audit.parquet"}, "n_stations": 3185, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 188, "cast_valid_mismatch": 984, "registered_not_positive": 32, "cast_gt_registered": 27, "invalid_gt_cast": 40}, "n_stations_flagged": 1070, "created_at": "2026-06-04T04:36:22.193010", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3185, "n_distinct_geometry": 9, "quality_index": 1.34, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.82, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.213, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.066, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.34, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.404, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.14, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.213, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.213, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.066, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.066, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.07, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.106, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.106, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "National Congress", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "SPLM", "margin": 49.61, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SDN", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"quarantined": 294, "final": 2891}, "flag_dictionary": {"participants_exceed_registered": "The number of participating voters is higher than the number of registered voters", "issued_exceeds_registered": "The number of ballots issued to voters is higher than the number of registered voters.", "issued_exceeds_participants": "The number of ballots issued to voters is higher than the number of participating voters.", "ballot_reconciliation_fail": "The total number of Ballots issued to voters does not equal the number of ballots received minus the number of spoiled and unused ballots", "in_box_exceeds_registered": "The total number of votes in the ballot box is higher than the number of registered voters. ", "in_box_exceeds_participants": "The total number of votes in the ballot box is higher than the number of participating voters. ", "discrepancy_mismatch": "The record discrepancy (F) does not equal the number of ballots issued to voters minus the total of ballots found in the box.", "vote_total_mismatch": "The total number of votes in the ballot box does not equal the total votes obtained by candidates plus the total number of invalid votes.", "over_95pct_share": "Unusual number of votes in the Polling Station (recommendation:  >95% of votes going to one candidate for more than 500 votes)", "in_box_exceeds_legal_max": "Number of Ballots found in the Box is equal or greater than the maximum authorized (1000 for Southern States, 1200 for Northern States)", "participants_box_difference_over_5pct": "Number of voters who participated in the voting is not different to 5% to the number of Ballots found in the Box"}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": true}, {"id": "10ede229278a41f4be0f29b422937345", "name": "Sudan 2010 \u2014 Party Lists to Southern Sudan Legislative Assembly", "metadata": {"country": "Sudan", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Built from NEC SQL Server backups (2010-05-03) restored locally. Source DB: ElectionsResult. Tables: FinalCentersResults + PartiesListVotesObtained + Parties + States + constituency tables. Includes full ballot-flow accounting (received, spoiled, unused, issued, in_box, discrepancy) alongside vote tallies \u2014 uniquely rich for forensics. Pre-South-Sudan-secession: 25 northern states + 10 southern states (later \u2192 South Sudan via 2011 referendum).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_party_8": "Congress national Party - NCP", "votes_party_9": "Peoples Congress Party - PCP", "votes_party_14": " Democratic Unionist Party - DUP", "votes_party_29": " Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF", "votes_party_32": "African National Congress - ANC", "votes_party_37": "Sudanese African National Union - SANU", "votes_party_38": " United Democratic Salvation Front \u2013 UDSFP/M", "votes_party_39": "United Democratic Salvation Front - UDSFP", "votes_party_50": " Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM", "votes_party_66": "Sudanese African United Party - SANU", "votes_party_74": " Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC", "votes_party_75": "National United Democratic Front -NUDF", "votes_party_82": "United Democratic Front for Southern Sudan - USPF-M", "votes_party_88": " United Democratic Front - UDF", "votes_party_103": "United Sudanese African Party - USAP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": ["emb_participants_exceed_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_participants", "emb_ballot_reconciliation_fail", "emb_in_box_exceeds_registered", "emb_in_box_exceeds_participants", "emb_discrepancy_mismatch", "emb_vote_total_mismatch", "emb_over_95pct_share", "emb_in_box_exceeds_legal_max", "emb_participants_box_difference_over_5pct"], "emb_flag_map": {"emb_participants_exceed_registered": "participants_exceed_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_registered": "issued_exceeds_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_participants": "issued_exceeds_participants", "emb_ballot_reconciliation_fail": "ballot_reconciliation_fail", "emb_in_box_exceeds_registered": "in_box_exceeds_registered", "emb_in_box_exceeds_participants": "in_box_exceeds_participants", "emb_discrepancy_mismatch": "discrepancy_mismatch", "emb_vote_total_mismatch": "vote_total_mismatch", "emb_over_95pct_share": "over_95pct_share", "emb_in_box_exceeds_legal_max": "in_box_exceeds_legal_max", "emb_participants_box_difference_over_5pct": "participants_box_difference_over_5pct"}, "audit_history_source": "sudan_2010_party_list_southern_assembly.audit.parquet"}, "n_stations": 3258, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 126, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1068, "registered_not_positive": 27, "cast_gt_registered": 31, "invalid_gt_cast": 30}, "n_stations_flagged": 1127, "created_at": "2026-06-04T04:35:32.828963", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3258, "n_distinct_geometry": 10, "quality_index": 1.34, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.82, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.213, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.066, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.34, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.404, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.14, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.213, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.213, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.066, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.066, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.07, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.106, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.106, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "National Congress", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "SPLM", "margin": 49.61, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SDN", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"recount": 2, "quarantined": 272, "final": 2984}, "flag_dictionary": {"participants_exceed_registered": "The number of participating voters is higher than the number of registered voters", "issued_exceeds_registered": "The number of ballots issued to voters is higher than the number of registered voters.", "issued_exceeds_participants": "The number of ballots issued to voters is higher than the number of participating voters.", "ballot_reconciliation_fail": "The total number of Ballots issued to voters does not equal the number of ballots received minus the number of spoiled and unused ballots", "in_box_exceeds_registered": "The total number of votes in the ballot box is higher than the number of registered voters. ", "in_box_exceeds_participants": "The total number of votes in the ballot box is higher than the number of participating voters. ", "discrepancy_mismatch": "The record discrepancy (F) does not equal the number of ballots issued to voters minus the total of ballots found in the box.", "vote_total_mismatch": "The total number of votes in the ballot box does not equal the total votes obtained by candidates plus the total number of invalid votes.", "over_95pct_share": "Unusual number of votes in the Polling Station (recommendation:  >95% of votes going to one candidate for more than 500 votes)", "in_box_exceeds_legal_max": "Number of Ballots found in the Box is equal or greater than the maximum authorized (1000 for Southern States, 1200 for Northern States)", "participants_box_difference_over_5pct": "Number of voters who participated in the voting is not different to 5% to the number of Ballots found in the Box"}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": true}, {"id": "f268a4d7863d48a4bee60718e78301ef", "name": "Sudan 2010 \u2014 Candidate to the Presidency of the Government of Southern Sudan", "metadata": {"country": "Sudan", "year": 2010, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Built from NEC SQL Server backups (2010-05-03) restored locally. Source DB: ElectionsResult. Tables: FinalCentersResults + CandidatesVotesObtained + Candidates + Parties + States + constituency tables. Includes full ballot-flow accounting (received, spoiled, unused, issued, in_box, discrepancy) alongside vote tallies \u2014 uniquely rich for forensics. Pre-South-Sudan-secession: 25 northern states + 10 southern states (later \u2192 South Sudan via 2011 referendum).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_cand_18186": "Atem Thiik Mayardit Salva Kiir ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_18187": "Ajawin Akol Lam ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": ["emb_participants_exceed_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_participants", "emb_ballot_reconciliation_fail", "emb_in_box_exceeds_registered", "emb_in_box_exceeds_participants", "emb_discrepancy_mismatch", "emb_vote_total_mismatch", "emb_over_95pct_share", "emb_in_box_exceeds_legal_max", "emb_participants_box_difference_over_5pct"], "emb_flag_map": {"emb_participants_exceed_registered": "participants_exceed_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_registered": "issued_exceeds_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_participants": "issued_exceeds_participants", "emb_ballot_reconciliation_fail": "ballot_reconciliation_fail", "emb_in_box_exceeds_registered": "in_box_exceeds_registered", "emb_in_box_exceeds_participants": "in_box_exceeds_participants", "emb_discrepancy_mismatch": "discrepancy_mismatch", "emb_vote_total_mismatch": "vote_total_mismatch", "emb_over_95pct_share": "over_95pct_share", "emb_in_box_exceeds_legal_max": "in_box_exceeds_legal_max", "emb_participants_box_difference_over_5pct": "participants_box_difference_over_5pct"}, "audit_history_source": "sudan_2010_southern_president.audit.parquet"}, "n_stations": 3578, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 48, "invalid_gt_cast": 47, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1191, "registered_not_positive": 29, "votes_gt_valid": 135}, "n_stations_flagged": 1234, "created_at": "2026-06-04T04:34:42.855487", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3578, "n_distinct_geometry": 11, "quality_index": 1.34, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.82, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.213, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.066, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.34, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.404, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.14, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.213, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.213, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.066, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.066, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.07, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.106, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.106, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "National Congress", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "SPLM", "margin": 49.61, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SDN", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"final": 3019, "excluded": 1, "quarantined": 558}, "flag_dictionary": {"participants_exceed_registered": "The number of participating voters is higher than the number of registered voters", "issued_exceeds_registered": "The number of ballots issued to voters is higher than the number of registered voters.", "issued_exceeds_participants": "The number of ballots issued to voters is higher than the number of participating voters.", "ballot_reconciliation_fail": "The total number of Ballots issued to voters does not equal the number of ballots received minus the number of spoiled and unused ballots", "in_box_exceeds_registered": "The total number of votes in the ballot box is higher than the number of registered voters. ", "in_box_exceeds_participants": "The total number of votes in the ballot box is higher than the number of participating voters. ", "discrepancy_mismatch": "The record discrepancy (F) does not equal the number of ballots issued to voters minus the total of ballots found in the box.", "vote_total_mismatch": "The total number of votes in the ballot box does not equal the total votes obtained by candidates plus the total number of invalid votes.", "over_95pct_share": "Unusual number of votes in the Polling Station (recommendation:  >95% of votes going to one candidate for more than 500 votes)", "in_box_exceeds_legal_max": "Number of Ballots found in the Box is equal or greater than the maximum authorized (1000 for Southern States, 1200 for Northern States)", "participants_box_difference_over_5pct": "Number of voters who participated in the voting is not different to 5% to the number of Ballots found in the Box"}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": true}, {"id": "25ae2abf5b834994a24e51cf6b6f7620", "name": "Sudan 2010 \u2014 Candidates to the Office of State Governor", "metadata": {"country": "Sudan", "year": 2010, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Built from NEC SQL Server backups (2010-05-03) restored locally. Source DB: ElectionsResult. Tables: FinalCentersResults + CandidatesVotesObtained + Candidates + Parties + States + constituency tables. Includes full ballot-flow accounting (received, spoiled, unused, issued, in_box, discrepancy) alongside vote tallies \u2014 uniquely rich for forensics. Pre-South-Sudan-secession: 25 northern states + 10 southern states (later \u2192 South Sudan via 2011 referendum).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_cand_241": "\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0634\u0639\u064a\u0628 \u0639\u064a\u0633\u0649 \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f (Truth Federal Party - TFP)", "votes_cand_242": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u062d\u0633\u0646 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_243": "\u0643\u0631\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u0643\u0631\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_335": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u062f\u0649 (independent)", "votes_cand_341": "\u0633\u0639\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_350": "\u0627\u0628\u0648 \u0631\u0648\u0641 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u0627\u0644\u0643 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1319": "\u0623\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0628\u062d\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0623\u0633\u0639\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_1322": "\u0636\u062d\u064a\u0629 \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u0631\u0628\u0627\u0628 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_1325": "\u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0647\u0627\u0631\u0648\u0646 \u062c\u0645\u0639\u0629 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_1356": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0645\u064a\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0645\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u0631\u0649 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1359": "\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062e\u0644\u064a\u0644 \u0641\u062a\u062d\u064a (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1361": "\u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_1650": "\u0623\u0628\u0648\u0631\u0648\u0641 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0639\u0645\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_1651": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0647\u062c\u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0634\u064a\u062e \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0648\u0645 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_1652": "\u0623\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0645\u0632\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_1653": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0643\u064a\u0645 \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u062c\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0638\u064a\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_1800": "\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u0649 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_1802": "\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0627\u062d\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_1803": "\u0627\u0644\u062c\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u062e\u0627\u0631\u0649 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_1804": "\u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0633\u0644\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0628\u062e\u064a\u062a \u0639\u0648\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_1806": "\u0639\u0633\u0643\u0648\u0631\u0649 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 \u0639\u0644\u0649 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_2087": "\u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0641\u0631\u062d \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_2089": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0644\u0643 \u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0628\u064a\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (independent)", "votes_cand_2093": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u062c\u0645\u0639\u0629 \u0627\u0632\u062f\u0647\u0627\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_2094": "\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0644\u064a ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_2097": "\u0642\u0631\u0646\u0627\u0635 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u0624\u0648\u0641 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_2101": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0646\u0627\u062c\u064a (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_2127": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0644\u064a (independent)", "votes_cand_2128": "\u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0625\u0633\u062d\u0642 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0643\u0645 \u062c\u0639\u0641\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_2130": "\u0623\u0628\u0648 \u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0628\u062d\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062a\u0627\u062c \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_3019": "\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631\u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0622\u062f\u0645  \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_3023": "\u0627\u062c\u0648\u0646\u0642 \u0631\u0645\u064a\u0628\u0648\u0649  \u0639\u0645\u0631  \u0642\u0627\u0636\u0649 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_3045": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631  \u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u0649 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_3060": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062c\u0630\u0648\u0628  \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649  \u0645\u062c\u0630\u0648\u0628 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_3065": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0627\u062f\u0631 (East Justice and Development Party -EJDP)", "votes_cand_3070": "\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643\u0648\u064a\u0646  \u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646  \u0635\u0644\u0627\u062d \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_3083": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0623\u0648\u0646\u0648\u0631  \u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631  \u0646\u0627\u064a\u0631 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_3089": "\u0622\u062f\u0645  \u062d\u0627\u062c \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f (East Democratic Party - EDP)", "votes_cand_3093": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0648\u0646\u0648\u0631  \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0628\u0643\u0631  \u0639\u0645\u0631 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_3095": "\u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0639\u0644\u0649  \u0623\u062f\u0631\u0648\u0628  \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f  \u0645\u062f\u064a\u0646\u0629 (independent)", "votes_cand_3104": "\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f  \u0631\u0627\u0628\u062d  \u062c\u0644\u0627\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (Truth Federal Party - TFP)", "votes_cand_3994": "\u0643\u0628\u0631 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_4040": "\u0627\u0644\u062f\u0648\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_4078": "\u0631\u064a\u0627\u0644 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u063a\u0641\u0627\u0631 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0627\u062f\u0645 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_4085": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_4126": "\u0623\u062a\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0645 \u0643\u062a\u0631 \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_5662": "\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u062a\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0627\u062a\u062d ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_5669": "\u0643\u0628\u0648\u0631 \u0643\u0627\u0634\u0627 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0645\u064a\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_5679": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_5691": "\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0639\u0645\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_5695": "MALEK KUOC MAYOM ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_5696": "\u0645\u0627\u062f\u0628\u0648 \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (Al Sudan Anna Party - AAP)", "votes_cand_5699": "AGAI AKOON HENRY (African National Congress - ANC)", "votes_cand_5702": "DELIEC MALEK NYANDENG ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_5706": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0633\u062d\u0642 \u0645\u0647\u062f\u064a \u0645\u0648\u0633\u0649 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_5727": "\u0646\u0635\u0631 \u0637\u0647 \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0628\u064a\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_5740": "\u0633\u0627\u0644\u0645 \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0639\u0627\u0628\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f (Sudanes Revolutionary Movement Committees-SRMC)", "votes_cand_5749": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0635\u0637\u0641\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_5755": "\u0628\u0631\u0643\u0627\u062a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_5761": "\u0627\u0644\u0647\u0646\u062f\u0649 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_5765": "\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0641 (independent)", "votes_cand_5770": "\u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_5776": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0634\u0631\u064a\u0641 \u062e\u0644\u0641 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_5785": "\u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u064a\u0648\u0646\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0631\u064a\u0641\u0649 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_5789": "\u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u0627\u0644\u0643 (independent)", "votes_cand_5799": "\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0648\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (independent)", "votes_cand_5932": "\u0633\u0627\u062c\u0648 \u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_5937": "\u0627\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0645\u0631  \u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0630\u064a\u0631 (South and North Funj  Association Party - SNFAP)", "votes_cand_5940": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0627\u0628\u064a\u0646\u064a \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 (Funj Association National Party - FANP)", "votes_cand_5942": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0635\u0627\u0645 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_5957": "\u062c\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0647 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 \u062c\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0647 \u0627\u0646\u0648\u0631 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_5962": "\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0642\u0627\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0641\u0631\u062d (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_7078": "\u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0627\u0645\u0644 (independent)", "votes_cand_7286": "\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0627\u062c \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0645\u064a\u0631\u063a\u0646\u064a ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_7295": "\u0633\u0639\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0628\u0644\u0627\u0644 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0642\u064a \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_7299": "\u064a\u062d\u064a\u0649 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0648\u0647\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u062c\u0627\u0646\u064a ( Justice Party - JP)", "votes_cand_7304": "\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0635\u064a\u0644\u064a \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0633\u0644\u064a\u0645\u0627\u0646 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_7306": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u062f\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_7308": "\u0632\u0627\u0643\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u064a\u0631\u063a\u0646\u064a \u0645\u0639\u062a\u0635\u0645 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_7917": "\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0637\u0644\u062d\u0629 \u0628\u0627\u0643\u0627\u0634 (independent)", "votes_cand_7918": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0648\u0645 \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_7919": "\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0635\u0631\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u0628\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_7920": "\u0642\u0646\u062f\u0648\u0641\u0627 \u0623\u064a\u0631 \u0639\u0642\u0627\u0631 \u0645\u0627\u0644\u0643 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_9306": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0641\u062a\u062d \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_9362": "Dogoogoo Hassan Zackaria Rizik ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_9373": "\u0627\u0644\u062d\u0644\u0648 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0622\u062f\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_9390": "\u0627\u0644\u062f\u062e\u064a\u0631\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0634\u0645\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 ( Umma Federal Party - UFP)", "votes_cand_9391": "Kaffa Ugali Tartizio Rozeta (African National Congress - ANC)", "votes_cand_9393": "\u0639\u0627\u0648\u0644 \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0627\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_9397": "\u0627\u0644\u0634\u0645\u0628\u0644\u064a \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_9399": "Yas Ngeleto Musa Stephen (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_9403": "Biar Akol Longar Ayuel (independent)", "votes_cand_9421": "\u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0622\u062f\u0645 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0634\u0627\u0641\u0639 \u0633\u0628\u064a\u0644 ( National Reform Party - NRP)", "votes_cand_9422": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f\u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 \u063a\u0627\u0632\u064a (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_9423": "\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0645\u064a \u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f \u0622\u062f\u0645 \u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_9424": "\u0641\u0636\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0635\u0627\u0644\u062d ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_9426": "\u0647\u0628\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u064a\u0648\u0633\u0641 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_9430": "\u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0637\u0627 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0639\u062a\u0635\u0645 ( Democratic Unionist Party - DUP)", "votes_cand_9431": "\u0647\u0628\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0627\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u0631\u062a\u0636\u0649 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_9432": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0632\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_9779": "\u0623\u064a\u0644\u0627 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_9782": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0641\u0627\u0637\u0645\u0629 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (independent)", "votes_cand_9784": "\u0646\u0643\u0633\u0648\u0628 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0636\u0631\u0627\u0631 \u0636\u0631\u0627\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_9793": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0628\u0627\u0645\u0643\u0627\u0631 \u062c\u0639\u0641\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_10623": "Two Ibrahim Elias Ishaq ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_11129": "Riak Dong Malwal Joseph (United Democratic Salvation Front - UDSFP)", "votes_cand_11865": "LADU SULE ABDUL RAHAMAN PETER ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_11866": "UMBA GORE LADU ALFRED (independent)", "votes_cand_11867": "GWOLLO KONGA WANI CLEMENT ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_11868": "LAKU CIRICIO LORO JAMES (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_11869": "NIGO SIMON RICHARD AYINE ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_12331": "\u0642\u0627\u064a \u062f\u064a\u0646\u0642 \u062a\u0639\u0628\u0627\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_12332": "\u062a\u064a\u0646\u062c \u0637\u0648\u0627\u0646 \u062a\u0648\u0645\u0633\u0648\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement / Democratic Change \u2013 SPLM/DC)", "votes_cand_12335": "\u062a\u064a\u0646\u062c \u062c\u0627\u0646\u062c \u0623\u0646\u062c\u0644\u064a\u0646\u0627 (independent)", "votes_cand_12336": "\u062f\u0648\u0646\u0642 \u0646\u064a\u0631\u0648 \u0643\u0648\u0646\u0642 (independent)", "votes_cand_12337": "\u0645\u0627\u0637\u0648\u062a \u0644\u064a\u0644\u064a \u0628\u0648\u0644 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_12338": "\u0631\u0648\u0627\u064a \u0643\u0648\u0646\u0642 \u0623\u0646\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0627 ( Southern Sudan Democratic Forum - SSDF)", "votes_cand_12339": "\u0642\u0627\u062a\u0643\u0648\u062b \u0645\u0628\u0648\u0631 \u062c\u064a\u0645\u0633 (National Democratic Front Party - NDFP)", "votes_cand_13029": "\u0639\u0644\u064a \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u062d\u0627\u0641\u0638 (independent)", "votes_cand_13040": "LOUIS LOBONG LOJORE LOYANMOE ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_13212": "Adal Awien Teresa (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_13312": "Ater Maper Awan Isaac (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_13408": "Madut Severino Akok Paul (independent)", "votes_cand_13859": "\u062f\u064a\u0628\u0648\u062b \u0642\u0631\u0646\u0642 \u062f\u064a\u0646\u0642 \u0642\u0644\u0648\u0627\u0643 (independent)", "votes_cand_13860": "\u0623\u062c\u0627\u0648\u064a\u0646 \u0623\u0643\u0648\u0644 \u064a\u0648\u0631 \u064a\u0648\u0627\u0646\u0633 (independent)", "votes_cand_13861": "\u0631\u0645\u0628\u0627\u0646\u0642 \u0634\u0627\u0648\u062c \u0634\u0627\u0631\u0644\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0641\u064a\u062a\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_13863": "\u064a\u0648\u0646\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u064a\u062c\u0627 \u0646\u064a\u0627\u0646\u0627\u0633 \u0633\u0627\u0631\u0647 (independent)", "votes_cand_13865": "\u062f\u0627\u0643 \u0628\u0634\u0648\u0643 \u062f\u0648\u0628 \u062f\u0627\u0643 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_13866": "\u0645\u0627\u0631 \u0641\u0648\u062c \u0643\u0648\u0646 \u0633\u0627\u064a\u0645\u0648\u0646 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_13870": "\u0637\u0648\u0646 \u064a\u0627\u062c \u0634\u0627\u0646\u0642 \u0634\u0627\u0646\u0642\u0633\u0648\u0646 \u0642\u0628\u0631\u064a\u0627\u0644 ( United Democratic Salvation Front \u2013 UDSFP/M)", "votes_cand_13871": "\u0631\u064a\u0627\u0643 \u0648\u064a\u0648 \u0623\u0646\u062f\u0631\u0648 \u0628\u0648\u0644 ( United Democratic Front - UDF)", "votes_cand_13889": "KUMBA TARIRA NUNU JEMMA ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_13890": "AHMED SAID KISANGA AWAD (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_13891": "BAMBEY AJALLA BULLEN ABBAS ( United Democratic Salvation Front \u2013 UDSFP/M)", "votes_cand_13892": "BAKOSORO MARIO JOSEPH BANGASI (independent)", "votes_cand_13893": "KIMBO ALEX UKELE NATALE (independent)", "votes_cand_13969": "Loklok Jakok Duer Joseph (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_13971": "Chaw Juuk Manyang Kuol ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_14414": "Dut Deng Athor George (independent)", "votes_cand_14530": "\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u0627\u0644\u0643 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0627\u0642\u0631 ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_14531": "\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0648\u0646\u0649 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u0627\u0633 \u0628\u0627\u0628\u0643\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_14532": "\u0645\u0648\u0633\u064a \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0639\u062a\u0635\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f (Bija Congress Party - BCP)", "votes_cand_14533": "\u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u062f\u0645  \u062d\u0633\u064a\u0646  \u0627\u0644\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 (Umma Reform and Development Party - URDP)", "votes_cand_14534": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0633\u0646 \u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_14535": "\u0627\u0644\u062f\u0627\u0628\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u064a\u0631\u064a \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_14536": "\u0625\u0633\u062d\u0642 \u0625\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639\u064a\u0644 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0627\u0636\u0644 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_14537": "\u062d\u0633\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0625\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0647\u0627\u062f\u0649 (East Democratic Party - EDP)", "votes_cand_14538": "\u064a\u0648\u0646\u0633 \u0628\u0646\u064a\u0629 \u0623\u062f\u0645 \u0633\u0644\u0648\u0649 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_14539": "\u062d\u0645\u0627\u062f \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0623\u062f\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_15993": "Jang Mayay Tong Chol ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_15994": "Mayol Abiei Kuc Gabriel (African National Congress - ANC)", "votes_cand_16441": "Kawac Makuei Mayar Kawac ( United Democratic Salvation Front \u2013 UDSFP/M)", "votes_cand_16532": "Dau Aturjong Nyuol Dau (independent)", "votes_cand_16533": "Joseph Ajuong Mayuol Kuel (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_17154": "Paul Malong Awan Anei ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_18283": "Aloisio Emor Ojutuk Ofuho (independent)", "votes_cand_19863": "\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0648\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0636\u0631 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_19870": "\u062e\u0627\u0637\u0631 \u062d\u0645\u062f\u0648\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0627\u0647\u0631 \u0627\u062f\u0645 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_19878": "\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 (independent)", "votes_cand_19881": "\u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0637\u0629 \u0628\u062f\u0631\u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_19888": "\u0627\u0628\u0648 \u0642\u0631\u062c\u0629 \u0643\u0646\u062a\u0628\u0627\u0649 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0648 \u0642\u0631\u062c\u0629 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_19897": "\u0627\u0644\u0637\u0648\u064a\u0644 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_19903": "\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0642\u0631 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0646\u0647\u0649 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_19910": "\u0627\u0628\u0649 \u0648\u0648\u0631 \u0627\u0628\u0649 \u0644\u064a\u0646\u0648 \u0627\u062f\u0648\u0631\u062f ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_19925": "\u0639\u064a\u0627\u0634 \u0646\u064a\u0648 \u0628\u0646\u0627\u0646\u0649 \u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 (Justice National Party - JNP)", "votes_cand_19931": "\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 \u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0628\u0643\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_19936": "\u0631\u0641\u0627\u0649 \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0634\u0631 (independent)", "votes_cand_19943": "\u0647\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0627\u0628\u062f\u0648\u0646 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0639\u0627\u0628\u062f\u0648\u0646 (independent)", "votes_cand_19951": "\u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0644\u064a\u0641\u0629 \u0639\u0628\u062f\u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u064a\u0645 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0639\u0628\u064a\u062f\u0629 (independent)", "votes_cand_19994": "\u0634\u062f\u0627\u062f \u0627\u0633\u062d\u0627\u0642 \u064a\u0639\u0642\u0648\u0628 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_19999": "\u062e\u0636\u0631 \u0639\u0645\u0631 \u0633\u0639\u062f \u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_20003": "\u0627\u0628\u0648\u0627\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0632\u0643\u0631\u064a\u0627 \u064a\u062d\u064a ( National Reform Party - NRP)", "votes_cand_20007": "\u0631\u0642\u064a\u0642 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0628\u0648\u0633\u0644\u064a\u0628 \u0639\u0644\u0649 ( Justice Party - JP)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": ["emb_participants_exceed_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_participants", "emb_ballot_reconciliation_fail", "emb_in_box_exceeds_registered", "emb_in_box_exceeds_participants", "emb_discrepancy_mismatch", "emb_vote_total_mismatch", "emb_over_95pct_share", "emb_in_box_exceeds_legal_max", "emb_participants_box_difference_over_5pct"], "emb_flag_map": {"emb_participants_exceed_registered": "participants_exceed_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_registered": "issued_exceeds_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_participants": "issued_exceeds_participants", "emb_ballot_reconciliation_fail": "ballot_reconciliation_fail", "emb_in_box_exceeds_registered": "in_box_exceeds_registered", "emb_in_box_exceeds_participants": "in_box_exceeds_participants", "emb_discrepancy_mismatch": "discrepancy_mismatch", "emb_vote_total_mismatch": "vote_total_mismatch", "emb_over_95pct_share": "over_95pct_share", "emb_in_box_exceeds_legal_max": "in_box_exceeds_legal_max", "emb_participants_box_difference_over_5pct": "participants_box_difference_over_5pct"}, "audit_history_source": "sudan_2010_governor.audit.parquet"}, "n_stations": 11204, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 337, "cast_valid_mismatch": 3414, "registered_not_positive": 41, "cast_gt_registered": 44, "invalid_gt_cast": 103}, "n_stations_flagged": 3530, "created_at": "2026-06-04T04:30:02.590782", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 11204, "n_distinct_geometry": 24, "quality_index": 1.34, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.82, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.213, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.066, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.34, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.404, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.14, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.213, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.213, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.066, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.066, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.07, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.106, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.106, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "National Congress", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "SPLM", "margin": 49.61, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SDN", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"excluded": 120, "recount": 8, "quarantined": 1019, "final": 10057}, "flag_dictionary": {"participants_exceed_registered": "The number of participating voters is higher than the number of registered voters", "issued_exceeds_registered": "The number of ballots issued to voters is higher than the number of registered voters.", "issued_exceeds_participants": "The number of ballots issued to voters is higher than the number of participating voters.", "ballot_reconciliation_fail": "The total number of Ballots issued to voters does not equal the number of ballots received minus the number of spoiled and unused ballots", "in_box_exceeds_registered": "The total number of votes in the ballot box is higher than the number of registered voters. ", "in_box_exceeds_participants": "The total number of votes in the ballot box is higher than the number of participating voters. ", "discrepancy_mismatch": "The record discrepancy (F) does not equal the number of ballots issued to voters minus the total of ballots found in the box.", "vote_total_mismatch": "The total number of votes in the ballot box does not equal the total votes obtained by candidates plus the total number of invalid votes.", "over_95pct_share": "Unusual number of votes in the Polling Station (recommendation:  >95% of votes going to one candidate for more than 500 votes)", "in_box_exceeds_legal_max": "Number of Ballots found in the Box is equal or greater than the maximum authorized (1000 for Southern States, 1200 for Northern States)", "participants_box_difference_over_5pct": "Number of voters who participated in the voting is not different to 5% to the number of Ballots found in the Box"}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": true}, {"id": "b8197678b42549c5805c108be8773acb", "name": "Sudan 2010 \u2014 Candidate to the Presidency of the Republic", "metadata": {"country": "Sudan", "year": 2010, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Built from NEC SQL Server backups (2010-05-03) restored locally. Source DB: ElectionsResult. Tables: FinalCentersResults + CandidatesVotesObtained + Candidates + Parties + States + constituency tables. Includes full ballot-flow accounting (received, spoiled, unused, issued, in_box, discrepancy) alongside vote tallies \u2014 uniquely rich for forensics. Pre-South-Sudan-secession: 25 northern states + 10 southern states (later \u2192 South Sudan via 2011 referendum).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_cand_18163": "\u0627\u0644\u0628\u0634\u064a\u0631 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062d\u0633\u0646 \u0639\u0645\u0631 (Congress national Party - NCP)", "votes_cand_18173": "\u0623\u064a\u0648\u0645 \u0646\u064a\u0627\u0644 \u062f\u064a\u0646\u0642  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647 (Peoples Congress Party - PCP)", "votes_cand_18174": "\u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0639\u0631\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f  \u064a\u0627\u0633\u0631 ( Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement - SPLM)", "votes_cand_18175": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u062f\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0627\u0636\u0644  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0647  \u0645\u0628\u0627\u0631\u0643 ( Umma Reform and Renewal Party - URRP)", "votes_cand_18176": "\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0647\u062f\u064a \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0631\u062d\u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u062f\u064a\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0635\u0627\u062f\u0642 ( Umma National Party - UNP)", "votes_cand_18177": "\u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0639\u062b\u0645\u0627\u0646  \u062e\u0627\u0644\u062f  \u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u064a\u0632 (Sudanese National Alliance Party - SNAP)", "votes_cand_18178": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0641\u064a\u0638 \u0625\u062f\u0631\u064a\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u064a\u0628 \u0643\u0627\u0645\u0644 (independent)", "votes_cand_18180": "\u0633\u064a\u0643\u0646\u062c\u0648 \u0639\u0644\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0631  \u062d\u0627\u062a\u0645 ( Unionist Democratic Party \u2013 Original UDP)", "votes_cand_18181": "\u0645\u0646\u0648\u0631 \u0646\u0642\u062f \u0625\u0628\u0631\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0645 \u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f ( Sudanese Communist Party - SCP)", "votes_cand_18182": "\u0645\u062d\u0645\u062f \u062c\u062d\u0627 \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f (independent)", "votes_cand_18183": "\u062c\u0644\u0627\u0628 \u0645\u0646\u064a\u0631  \u0634\u064a\u062e \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646 \u0645\u0646\u064a\u0631 (New National Democratic Party - NNDP)", "votes_cand_18184": "\u0639\u0628\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062d\u0645\u0648\u062f \u0623\u062d\u0645\u062f \u0641\u0627\u0637\u0645\u0629 ( Socialist Democratic Union Organization -SDUO)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": ["emb_participants_exceed_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_participants", "emb_ballot_reconciliation_fail", "emb_in_box_exceeds_registered", "emb_in_box_exceeds_participants", "emb_discrepancy_mismatch", "emb_vote_total_mismatch", "emb_over_95pct_share", "emb_in_box_exceeds_legal_max", "emb_participants_box_difference_over_5pct"], "emb_flag_map": {"emb_participants_exceed_registered": "participants_exceed_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_registered": "issued_exceeds_registered", "emb_issued_exceeds_participants": "issued_exceeds_participants", "emb_ballot_reconciliation_fail": "ballot_reconciliation_fail", "emb_in_box_exceeds_registered": "in_box_exceeds_registered", "emb_in_box_exceeds_participants": "in_box_exceeds_participants", "emb_discrepancy_mismatch": "discrepancy_mismatch", "emb_vote_total_mismatch": "vote_total_mismatch", "emb_over_95pct_share": "over_95pct_share", "emb_in_box_exceeds_legal_max": "in_box_exceeds_legal_max", "emb_participants_box_difference_over_5pct": "participants_box_difference_over_5pct"}, "audit_history_source": "sudan_2010_president.audit.parquet"}, "n_stations": 11836, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 56, "invalid_gt_cast": 72, "cast_valid_mismatch": 3392, "registered_not_positive": 40, "votes_gt_valid": 277}, "n_stations_flagged": 3493, "created_at": "2026-06-04T04:28:29.438191", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 11836, "n_distinct_geometry": 24, "quality_index": 1.34, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.82, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.213, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.066, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.34, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.404, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.14, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.213, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.213, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.066, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.066, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.07, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.106, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.106, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "National Congress", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "SPLM", "margin": 49.61, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SDN", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"final": 10993, "excluded": 131, "recount": 16, "quarantined": 696}, "flag_dictionary": {"participants_exceed_registered": "The number of participating voters is higher than the number of registered voters", "issued_exceeds_registered": "The number of ballots issued to voters is higher than the number of registered voters.", "issued_exceeds_participants": "The number of ballots issued to voters is higher than the number of participating voters.", "ballot_reconciliation_fail": "The total number of Ballots issued to voters does not equal the number of ballots received minus the number of spoiled and unused ballots", "in_box_exceeds_registered": "The total number of votes in the ballot box is higher than the number of registered voters. ", "in_box_exceeds_participants": "The total number of votes in the ballot box is higher than the number of participating voters. ", "discrepancy_mismatch": "The record discrepancy (F) does not equal the number of ballots issued to voters minus the total of ballots found in the box.", "vote_total_mismatch": "The total number of votes in the ballot box does not equal the total votes obtained by candidates plus the total number of invalid votes.", "over_95pct_share": "Unusual number of votes in the Polling Station (recommendation:  >95% of votes going to one candidate for more than 500 votes)", "in_box_exceeds_legal_max": "Number of Ballots found in the Box is equal or greater than the maximum authorized (1000 for Southern States, 1200 for Northern States)", "participants_box_difference_over_5pct": "Number of voters who participated in the voting is not different to 5% to the number of Ballots found in the Box"}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": true}, {"id": "82c93247c9464bf0ac3405dae935f4b4", "name": "Canada 2025 \u2014 45th GE poll-by-poll (NEW country)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Elections Canada open data (ovrGE45 pollbypoll_bureauparbureau, 343 EDs). 28 Apr 2025: Carney's Liberals minority ~43.8%, Conservatives (Poilievre) ~41.3%, NDP collapsed, BQ in Qu\u00e9bec. Candidate names\u21927 canonical party cols via table_tableau12. registered=Electors, cast=valid+rejected, valid=Total Votes, invalid=Rejected. First Canada VOTE dataset in corpus (previously only 2004 PD geometry).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Liberal": "Liberal", "Conservative": "Conservative", "NDP": "NDP", "Bloc Qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois": "Bloc Qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois", "Green": "Green", "People's Party": "People's Party", "Other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 81252, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 7369, "cast_gt_registered": 9183}, "n_stations_flagged": 9183, "created_at": "2026-06-03T23:25:01.382399", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.878, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.84, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.736, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.718, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.626, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.626, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.026, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 81252}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dfd69bb972324b9dbb07603a11972437", "name": "Chile 2025 \u2014 Presidential R2 (Kast v Jara, 40.9K mesas)", "metadata": {"country": "Chile", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "SERVEL Datos_SegundaVotacion (per-mesa), 14 Dec 2025 runoff fetched via Chile VPN. 40,888 mesas. Jos\u00e9 Antonio Kast (Republicanos) 58.2% beat Jeannette Jara (PC) 41.8%. registered=electores, cast=Total Suma, valid=Total V\u00e1lidos, invalid=Nulos+Blanco; \u03a3cand==valid exactly. Compulsory voting, 85.4% turnout. Completes the Chile 2025 pair (R1 already loaded).", "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"JEANNETTE JARA ROMAN": "JEANNETTE JARA ROMAN", "JOSE ANTONIO KAST RIST": "JOSE ANTONIO KAST RIST"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40888, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 107, "registered_not_positive": 425, "cast_gt_registered": 17, "invalid_gt_cast": 106}, "n_stations_flagged": 549, "created_at": "2026-06-03T23:22:51.470976", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.841, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.921, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.839, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.781, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.727, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.64, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.64, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.075, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.075, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 40888}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d6832f424dd442b5b78a77a017aa6205", "name": "Poland 2025 \u2014 Presidential R2 (Nawrocki v Trzaskowski, 32.1K)", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "PKW per-obw\u00f3d, 1 June 2025 runoff. 32,143 obwody. Karol Nawrocki (PiS-backed) 50.89% beat Rafa\u0142 Trzaskowski (KO) 49.11% \u2014 matches official exactly. turnout 71.6%. \u03a3cand==valid exactly. (foreign/diaspora obwody preserved via station_id uniquify.)", "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"NAWROCKI Karol Tadeusz": "NAWROCKI Karol Tadeusz", "TRZASKOWSKI Rafa\u0142 Kazimierz": "TRZASKOWSKI Rafa\u0142 Kazimierz"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 32143, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 2901, "registered_not_positive": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 2904, "created_at": "2026-06-03T23:20:41.258808", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.449, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.768, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.645, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.449, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.874, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.375, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.598, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.671, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.081, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.081, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.917, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 32143}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ecb5733a4582473c9ef73b2b95f9ca99", "name": "Poland 2025 \u2014 Presidential R1 per-obw\u00f3d (32.1K)", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "PKW prezydent2025.pkw.gov.pl protokoly_po_obwodach (UTF-8 CSV). 32,143 obwody \u00d7 13 candidates, 18 May 2025. Trzaskowski (KO) 31.4% / Nawrocki (PiS) 29.5% / Mentzen 14.8% / Braun 6.2%. registered=uprawnionych, cast=karty wydane \u0142\u0105cznie, valid=g\u0142os\u00f3w wa\u017cnych na kandydat\u00f3w, invalid=g\u0142os\u00f3w niewa\u017cnych; \u03a3cand==valid exactly. turnout 67.3%.", "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"BARTOSZEWICZ Artur": "BARTOSZEWICZ Artur", "BIEJAT Magdalena Agnieszka": "BIEJAT Magdalena Agnieszka", "BRAUN Grzegorz Micha\u0142": "BRAUN Grzegorz Micha\u0142", "HO\u0141OWNIA Szymon Franciszek": "HO\u0141OWNIA Szymon Franciszek", "JAKUBIAK Marek": "JAKUBIAK Marek", "MACIAK Maciej": "MACIAK Maciej", "MENTZEN S\u0142awomir Jerzy": "MENTZEN S\u0142awomir Jerzy", "NAWROCKI Karol Tadeusz": "NAWROCKI Karol Tadeusz", "SENYSZYN Joanna": "SENYSZYN Joanna", "STANOWSKI Krzysztof Jakub": "STANOWSKI Krzysztof Jakub", "TRZASKOWSKI Rafa\u0142 Kazimierz": "TRZASKOWSKI Rafa\u0142 Kazimierz", "WOCH Marek Marian": "WOCH Marek Marian", "ZANDBERG Adrian Tadeusz": "ZANDBERG Adrian Tadeusz"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 32143, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 3854, "registered_not_positive": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3857, "created_at": "2026-06-03T23:18:50.727439", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.449, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.768, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.645, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.449, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.874, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.375, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.598, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.671, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.081, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.081, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.917, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 32143}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "30a30ade63264dc48aa8e8c2bd5615ed", "name": "Romania 2025 \u2014 Presidential RE-RUN R2 (Dan v Simion, 19.9K)", "metadata": {"country": "Romania", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "AEP prezenta.roaep.ro browser-fetched. 19,944 sections, 18 May 2025. Nicu\u0219or Dan 53.6% beat George Simion 46.4%; turnout 64.7%. \u03a3cand==valid exactly. The decisive re-vote after the annulled Dec-2024 election.", "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"GEORGE-NICOLAE SIMION": "GEORGE-NICOLAE SIMION", "NICU\u0218OR-DANIEL DAN": "NICU\u0218OR-DANIEL DAN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19944, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 43, "registered_not_positive": 965, "cast_gt_registered": 1251}, "n_stations_flagged": 1287, "created_at": "2026-06-03T23:16:39.376654", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.266, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.912, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.605, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.464, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.311, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.578, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.417, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.767, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.608, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.424, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.877, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.419, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.419, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 19944}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "27d9c4759c304d99bf6b608154d7034c", "name": "Romania 2025 \u2014 Presidential RE-RUN R1 per-section (19.9K)", "metadata": {"country": "Romania", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "AEP prezenta.roaep.ro (WAF-gated; browser-fetched per-county pv_{cc}.json, scope PRCNCT). 19,944 sections \u00d7 11 cands, 4 May 2025 re-run after CCR annulled Dec-2024. Simion 41% / Dan 21% / Antonescu 20% / Ponta 13%; turnout 53.2%. PV semantics a=registered,b=cast,c=valid,d=null; \u03a3cand==valid exactly. Companion to presidential_r1_annulled (2024).", "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"GEORGE-NICOLAE SIMION": "GEORGE-NICOLAE SIMION", "GEORGE-CRIN-LAUREN\u021aIU ANTONESCU": "GEORGE-CRIN-LAUREN\u021aIU ANTONESCU", "ELENA-VALERICA LASCONI": "ELENA-VALERICA LASCONI", "CRISTIAN-VASILE TERHE\u0218": "CRISTIAN-VASILE TERHE\u0218", "MARCELA-LAVINIA \u0218ANDRU": "MARCELA-LAVINIA \u0218ANDRU", "VICTOR-VIOREL PONTA": "VICTOR-VIOREL PONTA", "SEBASTIAN-CONSTANTIN POPESCU": "SEBASTIAN-CONSTANTIN POPESCU", "SILVIU PREDOIU": "SILVIU PREDOIU", "JOHN-ION BANU-MUSCEL": "JOHN-ION BANU-MUSCEL", "PETRU-DANIEL FUNERIU": "PETRU-DANIEL FUNERIU", "NICU\u0218OR-DANIEL DAN": "NICU\u0218OR-DANIEL DAN"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19944, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 1140, "cast_valid_mismatch": 80, "registered_not_positive": 965}, "n_stations_flagged": 1212, "created_at": "2026-06-03T23:15:23.001545", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.266, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.912, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.605, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.464, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.311, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.578, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.417, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.767, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.608, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.424, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.877, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.419, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.419, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 19944}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "116752bf4d98477d93e070b08be2814f", "name": "Honduras 2025 \u2014 Presidential per-JRV (NEW country, 19.2K)", "metadata": {"country": "Honduras", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "CNA/eVoting transparency platform (web.sie.evoting.com) via Wayback (official CNE portal decommissioned). 5-Dec-2025 provisional snapshot, 19,152 JRVs \u00d7 5 presidential candidates across 18 departments. Photo-finish: Asfura (PNH) 40.0% vs Nasralla (PLH) 39.8% (0.2pp), Moncada (Libre) 19.1%. Per-JRV results dict mixes all races (congress multi-vote) \u2014 presidential isolated by frontrunner-UUID filter. cast=ballotCasts, valid=\u03a3cand, invalid=null+blank; registered not published (synth). First Honduras dataset in corpus.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "_registered_synth", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"Asfura (PNH)": "Asfura (PNH)", "Nasralla (PLH)": "Nasralla (PLH)", "Moncada (Libre)": "Moncada (Libre)", "Rivera (DC)": "Rivera (DC)", "Avila (PINU)": "Avila (PINU)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19152, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 15757, "invalid_gt_cast": 41, "registered_not_positive": 19152, "cast_valid_mismatch": 1083}, "n_stations_flagged": 19152, "created_at": "2026-06-03T23:13:27.312232", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.595, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.506, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.511, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.38, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.595, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.377, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.232, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.138, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.284, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.312, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.511, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.511, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.38, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.38, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.256, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.256, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 19152}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "13233ad6c69e44d0a2387d9d894ec4e9", "name": "Germany 2024 \u2014 Brandenburg Landtag per-Wahlbezirk (3.9K)", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Brandenburg Landtagswahl 22 Sep 2024, votemanager XLSX (Zweitstimmen). 3,925 Wahlbezirke (incl. Briefwahl) \u00d7 14 parties. SPD (Woidke) 30.9% narrowly beat AfD 29.2%, BSW 13.5%, CDU 12.1%; turnout 72.9%. \u03a3party==valid exactly. First German state (Landtag) election in corpus.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"SPD": "SPD", "AfD": "AfD", "CDU": "CDU", "GR\u00dcNE-B 90": "GR\u00dcNE-B 90", "DIE LINKE": "DIE LINKE", "BVB - FREIE W\u00c4HLER": "BVB - FREIE W\u00c4HLER", "FDP": "FDP", "Tierschutzpartei": "Tierschutzpartei", "Plus": "Plus", "BSW": "BSW", "III_ Weg": "III_ Weg", "DKP": "DKP", "DLW": "DLW", "WU": "WU"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3925, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 687, "cast_gt_registered": 687}, "n_stations_flagged": 687, "created_at": "2026-06-03T23:12:50.534776", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.825, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.778, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.567, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3925}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d385197979f449cb9bd5021cb6782f6b", "name": "Portugal 2025 \u2014 Legislativas per-freguesia (3.1K)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "MAI eleicoes.mai.gov.pt static files (Angular SPA fallback; territory tree LOCAL-500000\u2192distrito\u2192concelho\u2192freguesia, results territory-results-LOCAL-{DDCCFF}-AR.json). 3,092 freguesias \u00d7 21 party-lists, 18 May 2025 snap. AD (PPD-PSD/CDS) 32.9%, PS 24.0%, Chega 23.1% surge, IL 5.7%. registered\u2248numberVoters/percentageVoters; cast=numberVoters; valid=\u03a3party; invalid=blank+null. turnout 64.4%.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"PPD-PSD_CDS-PP_PPM": "PPD-PSD_CDS-PP_PPM", "PS": "PS", "CH": "CH", "B_E_": "B_E_", "IL": "IL", "ADN": "ADN", "L": "L", "PCP-PEV": "PCP-PEV", "R_I_R_": "R_I_R_", "E": "E", "JPP": "JPP", "MPT": "MPT", "PAN": "PAN", "PPD-PSD_CDS-PP": "PPD-PSD_CDS-PP", "PCTP-MRPP": "PCTP-MRPP", "NC": "NC", "PPM": "PPM", "ND": "ND", "VP": "VP", "PLS": "PLS", "PTP": "PTP"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3092, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-03T23:12:27.533148", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.926, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.717, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.228, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.919, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.166, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.166, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.899, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 3092}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c3b8c53aba954b79a539538f7da20020", "name": "Kosovo 2025 (Dec) \u2014 Parliamentary per-polling-station (2.6K)", "metadata": {"country": "Kosovo", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "KQZ/QKN official live-results portal (resultsparliamentary2025.kqz-ks.org), data host storage.kqz-ks.org JSON reverse-engineered from the Vue SPA bundle. 28 Dec 2025 SNAP election (Feb-2025 Assembly dissolved 20 Nov after failing to form govt). 2,557 polling stations \u00d7 24 entities, 100% processed (updatedAt 2025-12-31). Vet\u00ebvendosje (Kurti) 49.3%, PDK 21%, LDK 13.6%; turnout 45.4%. registered=maxPossibleVoters, cast=currentVoters, valid=sum(entityVotes).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "municipality_id", "sub_region_col": "voting_station", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"NOVA DEMOKRATSKA STRANKA": "NOVA DEMOKRATSKA STRANKA", "KOSOVA DEMOKRAT\u0130K T\u00dcRK PART\u0130S\u0130 - KDTP": "KOSOVA DEMOKRAT\u0130K T\u00dcRK PART\u0130S\u0130 - KDTP", "PARTIA BALLI KOMB\u00cbTAR DEMOKRAT SHQIPTAR": "PARTIA BALLI KOMB\u00cbTAR DEMOKRAT SHQIPTAR", "FJALA": "FJALA", "L\u00ebvizja P\u00ebrparimtare e Rom\u00ebve t\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs": "L\u00ebvizja P\u00ebrparimtare e Rom\u00ebve t\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs", "L\u00ebvizja VET\u00cbVENDOSJE!": "L\u00ebvizja VET\u00cbVENDOSJE!", "Iniciativa Qytetare P\u00ebr Kosov\u00eb": "Iniciativa Qytetare P\u00ebr Kosov\u00eb", "JEDINSTVENA GORANSKA PARTIJA": "JEDINSTVENA GORANSKA PARTIJA", "Ned\u017emidin Sejdilar": "Ned\u017emidin Sejdilar", "PARTIA LIBERALE EGJIPTIANE": "PARTIA LIBERALE EGJIPTIANE", "KOSOVSKI SAVEZ": "KOSOVSKI SAVEZ", "NISMA SOCIALDEMOKRATE - NISMA": "NISMA SOCIALDEMOKRATE - NISMA", "LIDHJA DEMOKRATIKE E KOSOV\u00cbS - LDK": "LIDHJA DEMOKRATIKE E KOSOV\u00cbS - LDK", "Kosovaki Nevi Romani Partia": "Kosovaki Nevi Romani Partia", "PAI-PDAK-LPB": "PAI-PDAK-LPB", "SOCIJALDEMOKRATSKA UNIJA - SDU": "SOCIJALDEMOKRATSKA UNIJA - SDU", "SRPSKA LISTA": "SRPSKA LISTA", "INICIATIVA E RE DEMOKRATIKE E KOSOV\u00cbS": "INICIATIVA E RE DEMOKRATIKE E KOSOV\u00cbS", "AAK - ALEANCA P\u00cbR ARDHM\u00cbRIN\u00cb E KOSOV\u00cbS": "AAK - ALEANCA P\u00cbR ARDHM\u00cbRIN\u00cb E KOSOV\u00cbS", "PARTIA DEMOKRATIKE E KOSOV\u00cbS - PDK": "PARTIA DEMOKRATIKE E KOSOV\u00cbS - PDK", "PSA": "PSA", "KOALICIJA VAKAT": "KOALICIJA VAKAT", "PARTIA ROME E BASHKUAR E KOSOV\u00cbS": "PARTIA ROME E BASHKUAR E KOSOV\u00cbS", "Za Slobodu Pravdu i Opstanak": "Za Slobodu Pravdu i Opstanak"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2557, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-03T23:10:46.584241", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.218, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.406, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.631, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.457, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.218, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.406, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.278, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.441, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.0, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.082, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.104, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.457, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.638, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.348, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.348, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2557}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a7de9bef1e5a4dd79ef330f8de2a152a", "name": "Nigeria 2023 (Presidential, PU-level \u2014 complete)", "metadata": {"country": "Nigeria", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Nigeria 2023 presidential election (25 Feb 2023). Tinubu (APC) won 36.61%. **Rebuilt 2026-05-27 from 3 sources to lift coverage 68.3% \u2192 93.5% (123,894 \u2192 165,350 PUs of INEC's 176,846-PU universe).** Layers: (a) 123,894 transcribed PUs from Mark Essien's HNG dataset (original baseline; heavy southern bias); (b) 24,996 OCR'd PUs (Claude Sonnet 4.5 Vision on Wayback-archived EC8A scans; 57.9% high+medium confidence per `ocr_confidence` column); (c) 16,460 inferred-excluded PUs (in INEC registry but no PDF, no overlay flag \u2014 votes=0, `data_source='inferred_excluded'`). The northern security-zone gap (Sokoto/Taraba/Yobe/Zamfara <3.5% \u2192 47-74%) is closed: those states now have meaningful representation. The remaining 11,496 PUs are PUs with no EC8A document on Wayback and no overlay record \u2014 true data unavailability rather than under-sampling. OCR pipeline: nigeria-2023-rebuild/06_wayback_ocr_runner.py + Wayback `/available`\u2192CDX \u2192 Brotli decompress \u2192 PyMuPDF JPEG render (dim-capped 7800px / 3.6MB) \u2192 Anthropic claude-sonnet-4-5 vision \u2192 structured JSON. Total OCR cost: $158.23. The `data_source` column distinguishes the 4 layers; the `ocr_confidence` column (only set on `data_source='ocr'`) lets downstream consumers filter to high+medium for forensic tests if desired.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_apc": "Bola Tinubu (APC) \u2014 winner", "votes_lp": "Peter Obi (LP)", "votes_pdp": "Atiku Abubakar (PDP)", "votes_nnpp": "Rabiu Kwankwaso (NNPP)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 165350, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 2351, "cast_valid_mismatch": 13541, "registered_not_positive": 24127, "cast_gt_registered": 2035, "invalid_gt_cast": 181}, "n_stations_flagged": 38099, "created_at": "2026-05-27T13:25:29.503586", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 150393, "n_distinct_geometry": 1949, "quality_index": 2.108, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.659, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.484, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.316, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.108, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.659, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.365, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.995, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.514, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.383, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.808, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.484, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.484, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.28, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.28, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.666, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.415, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 165350}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a683b43aeb2e42a083d42d668b15b4bf", "name": "Ukraine 2010 Local Elections \u2014 Elected Officials Roster (31.10.2010)", "metadata": {"country": "Ukraine", "year": 2010, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Ukraine 2010 local elections, held 31 October 2010. WINNERS-ONLY roster scraped from CVK vm2010 archive at cvk.gov.ua/pls/vm2010/. 47,389 elected officials across 12,059 councils in 27 oblasts. LAST Ukrainian local election BEFORE the 2014 annexation, so Crimea + Sevastopol are included in the data. Same winners-only structure as the 2020 sibling obranyvm. F58/F50 = deputy/head vote count from CVK. NO defeated candidates, NO polling-station tallies, NO registered/cast/valid published. Long-format with candidate=nominating_party so the forensic engine groups winners by party for digit-test cohort analysis.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "candidate", "long_candidate_votes_col": "votes", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {"final": "final"}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 47389, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 47389, "cast_gt_registered": 36160}, "n_stations_flagged": 47389, "created_at": "2026-05-26T15:26:35.274130", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.69, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.049, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.484, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.264, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.69, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.049, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.036, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.458, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.353, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.338, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.971, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.484, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.484, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.264, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.264, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.33, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.211, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.211, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.719, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Party of Regions", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "All-Ukrainian Union \"Fatherland\"", "margin": 3.48, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "UKR", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 47389}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f70dda724b694fc6923769db601d49d3", "name": "United States 2020 (U.S. Senate, MEDSL precincts)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "U.S. Senate general election (2020), precinct-level. 73,456 precincts \u00d7 5 party buckets (DEM/REP/LIB/GREEN/OTHER, where OTHER absorbs Independent + misc. parties + write-ins-by-party). Source: MEDSL Dataverse (see SOURCES.md) (CC0 1.0). registered = valid synthesised (no per-precinct registration figure in MEDSL); quality_flags = ['registered_synthesised'] on every row so turnout-based tests (KHT corner) read as uninformative.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "Democratic Party (SENATE race candidate)", "votes_republican": "Republican Party (SENATE race candidate)", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian Party", "votes_green": "Green Party", "votes_other": "Other (Independent + minor parties + write-ins)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 73456, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 611}, "n_stations_flagged": 611, "created_at": "2026-05-26T15:03:23.763361", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.754, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.681, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.815, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.734, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.681, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.473, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.429, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.917, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.928, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.085, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.085, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.901, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 73456}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "192c7fb5e72b447b84b2b4db9546b691", "name": "United States 2018 (U.S. Senate, MEDSL precincts)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "U.S. Senate general election (2018), precinct-level. 153,148 precincts \u00d7 5 party buckets (DEM/REP/LIB/GREEN/OTHER, where OTHER absorbs Independent + misc. parties + write-ins-by-party). Source: MEDSL Dataverse (see SOURCES.md) (CC0 1.0). registered = valid synthesised (no per-precinct registration figure in MEDSL); quality_flags = ['registered_synthesised'] on every row so turnout-based tests (KHT corner) read as uninformative.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "Democratic Party (SENATE race candidate)", "votes_republican": "Republican Party (SENATE race candidate)", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian Party", "votes_green": "Green Party", "votes_other": "Other (Independent + minor parties + write-ins)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 153148, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 10381}, "n_stations_flagged": 10381, "created_at": "2026-05-26T14:21:31.453938", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.382, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.914, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.824, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.739, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.382, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.7, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.527, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.274, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.495, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.407, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.739, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.635, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.935, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.097, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.097, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.903, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 153148}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f2461108504c4ad18b8031aa68b6a010", "name": "United States 2016 (U.S. Senate, MEDSL precincts)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "U.S. Senate general election (2016), precinct-level. 139,754 precincts \u00d7 5 party buckets (DEM/REP/LIB/GREEN/OTHER, where OTHER absorbs Independent + misc. parties + write-ins-by-party). Source: MEDSL Dataverse (see SOURCES.md) (CC0 1.0). registered = valid synthesised (no per-precinct registration figure in MEDSL); quality_flags = ['registered_synthesised'] on every row so turnout-based tests (KHT corner) read as uninformative.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "Democratic Party (SENATE race candidate)", "votes_republican": "Republican Party (SENATE race candidate)", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian Party", "votes_green": "Green Party", "votes_other": "Other (Independent + minor parties + write-ins)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 139754, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 2036}, "n_stations_flagged": 2036, "created_at": "2026-05-26T13:43:45.586843", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.259, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.885, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.83, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.259, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.594, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.554, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.495, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.068, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.068, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 14.13, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 139754}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dd8b0aae92464934bd8de28897220f46", "name": "United States 2020 (U.S. House of Representatives, MEDSL precincts)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "U.S. House of Representatives general election (2020), precinct-level. 158,471 precincts \u00d7 5 party buckets (DEM/REP/LIB/GREEN/OTHER, where OTHER absorbs Independent + misc. parties + write-ins-by-party). Source: MEDSL Dataverse (see SOURCES.md) (CC0 1.0). registered = valid synthesised (no per-precinct registration figure in MEDSL); quality_flags = ['registered_synthesised'] on every row so turnout-based tests (KHT corner) read as uninformative.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "Democratic Party (HOUSE race candidate)", "votes_republican": "Republican Party (HOUSE race candidate)", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian Party", "votes_green": "Green Party", "votes_other": "Other (Independent + minor parties + write-ins)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 158471, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 5982}, "n_stations_flagged": 5982, "created_at": "2026-05-26T13:03:48.547791", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.754, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.681, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.815, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.734, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.681, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.473, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.429, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.917, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.928, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.085, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.085, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.901, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 158471}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fcefb00d02334abea8da073ae95f99ec", "name": "United States 2018 (U.S. House of Representatives, MEDSL precincts)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "U.S. House of Representatives general election (2018), precinct-level. 195,082 precincts \u00d7 5 party buckets (DEM/REP/LIB/GREEN/OTHER, where OTHER absorbs Independent + misc. parties + write-ins-by-party). Source: MEDSL Dataverse (see SOURCES.md) (CC0 1.0). registered = valid synthesised (no per-precinct registration figure in MEDSL); quality_flags = ['registered_synthesised'] on every row so turnout-based tests (KHT corner) read as uninformative.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "Democratic Party (HOUSE race candidate)", "votes_republican": "Republican Party (HOUSE race candidate)", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian Party", "votes_green": "Green Party", "votes_other": "Other (Independent + minor parties + write-ins)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 195082, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 11049}, "n_stations_flagged": 11049, "created_at": "2026-05-26T12:10:32.109761", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.382, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.914, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.824, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.739, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.382, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.7, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.527, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.274, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.495, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.407, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.739, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.635, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.935, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.097, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.097, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.903, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 195082}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2415b7a83b1848259bb910ac04d868a6", "name": "Russia 2011 State Duma Election - Polling-Station-Level (geocoded)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Russia 2011 State Duma election held 4 December 2011, the contest that triggered the Bolotnaya protests and Shpilkin's first widely-cited fraud analysis. 81,840 polling stations geocoded by Konstantin Kuk (https://github.com/kuk/analyze-izbirkom, https://habr.com/ru/post/279157/) \u2014 addresses scraped from cikrf.ru, geocoded via Yandex Geocoder. ~85% coverage of the ~96k total UIKs in 2011. 7 parties: ER (Yedinaya Rossiya), KPRF, LDPR, SR, Yabloko, Patrioty Rossii, Pravoye Delo. Convention: registered=size (line 1, voters on list); cast=total (line 2, ballots received by UIK - this is what CIK reports as nominal turnout); valid=votes (line 10, valid ballots = sum of party votes); invalid=cast-valid. The 2011 election is the canonical case study for the Kobak/Shpilkin integer-percentage falsification fingerprint and the Beber-Scacco last-digit anomaly.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "candidate", "long_candidate_votes_col": "votes", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {"final": "final"}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 81840, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 28410}, "n_stations_flagged": 28410, "created_at": "2026-05-26T12:01:39.978158", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.737, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.331, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.299, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.134, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.331, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.583, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.205, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.608, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.152, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.313, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.451, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.108, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.277, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.299, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.299, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.134, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.225, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.225, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.125, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.125, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.429, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "United Russia", "winner_candidate": "Vladimir Putin", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Communist Party of the Russian Federation", "margin": 46.42, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "RUS", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 81840}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "da07ad5c8a074662830cd6ecd2b1a80f", "name": "Afghanistan 2014 Presidential (runoff, with IEEC audit overlay)", "metadata": {"country": "Afghanistan", "year": 2014, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Afghanistan 2014 Presidential RUNOFF (14 June 2014) \u2014 the most-audited election in Afghan history. After preliminary results showed Ghani winning by 13 pp the Abdullah camp alleged fraud and the international community brokered a UN-led full audit of EVERY runoff polling station (~22k boxes), July-August 2014. Outcome: a national-unity government between Ghani (President) and Abdullah (CEO). This parquet merges Cookman's per-station vote tallies with his keyfile's post_audit_status column: Validated \u2192 final, Recounted \u2192 recount, Invalidated \u2192 excluded, blank \u2192 unknown. The Recounted bucket (~40% of stations) is the headline audit figure \u2014 it is NOT 'final' in the as-published sense, hence result_status=recount. USE the StatusFilterChips / BeforeAfterCancellationToggle to flip between Published view (Validated only) vs Pre-cancellation view (Validated + Recounted + Invalidated + unknown). Verdict flips between those views answer the headline question: did the IEEC's audit materially clean up an anomalous count, or were the anomalies pervasive?", "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_dr_abdullah_abdullah_fr_winner": "Dr. Abdullah Abdullah (FR winner)", "votes_mohammad_ashraf_ghani_ahmadzai_ro_winner": "Mohammad Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai (RO winner)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {"final": "final", "quarantined": "quarantined", "recount": "recount", "excluded": "excluded", "unknown": "unknown"}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 22324, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-05-18T20:08:41.996470", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 22324, "n_distinct_geometry": 6816, "quality_index": 1.725, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.244, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.35, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.199, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.725, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.244, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.546, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.636, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.629, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.157, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.101, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.275, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.418, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.35, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.35, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.199, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.199, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.2, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.2, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.519, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.519, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.231, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.231, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 12.8, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "AFG", "year": 2014, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"final": 12057, "recount": 9438, "excluded": 829}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": true}, {"id": "87d7ce4f142140d09c229b9af1b1d8af", "name": "Afghanistan 2014 Presidential (1st round, with IEEC audit overlay)", "metadata": {"country": "Afghanistan", "year": 2014, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Afghanistan 2014 Presidential 1st round (5 April 2014). Per-station vote tallies from Cookman's IEC transcription, merged with the IEEC post-audit status from Cookman's ps_key_2014.csv keyfile. Inner-joined on station_id == ps_code; first-round IDs were zero-padded to match the keyfile's NN format. result_status derived from post_audit_status: Validated \u2192 final, Recounted \u2192 recount, Invalidated \u2192 excluded, blank \u2192 unknown. The 2014 audit was the UN-led full audit triggered by the Abdullah-Ghani dispute after the runoff; this 1st-round overlay carries the SAME station-level audit decisions because the IEEC re-adjudicated the entire roster, not just runoff boxes. USE the StatusFilterChips / BeforeAfterCancellationToggle to compare Published view (excludes Invalidated stations) vs Pre-cancellation view (every station, including the excluded).", "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_dr_abdullah_abdullah_fr_winner": "Dr. Abdullah Abdullah (FR winner)", "votes_abdul_rahim_wardak": "Abdul Rahim Wardak", "votes_zalmai_rasul": "Zalmai Rasul", "votes_abdul_qayum_karzai": "Abdul Qayum Karzai", "votes_mohammad_sahfiq_gul_agha_sherzai": "Mohammad Sahfiq Gul Agha Sherzai", "votes_hedayat_amin_arsala": "Hedayat Amin Arsala", "votes_abdul_rab_rasul_sayaf": "Abdul Rab Rasul Sayaf", "votes_eng_qutbudin_hilal": "Eng. Qutbudin Hilal", "votes_mohammad_ashraf_ghani_ahmadzai_ro_winner": "Mohammad Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai (RO winner)", "votes_mohammad_nader_naeem": "Mohammad Nader Naeem", "votes_mohammad_daoud_sultanzoy": "Mohammad Daoud Sultanzoy"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": "result_status", "result_status_map": {"final": "final", "quarantined": "quarantined", "recount": "recount", "excluded": "excluded", "unknown": "unknown"}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18474, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 95}, "n_stations_flagged": 95, "created_at": "2026-05-18T20:07:21.332362", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 18471, "n_distinct_geometry": 5346, "quality_index": 1.725, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.244, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.35, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.199, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.725, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.244, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.546, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.636, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.629, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.157, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.101, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.275, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.418, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.35, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.35, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.199, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.199, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.2, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.2, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.519, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.519, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.231, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.231, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 12.8, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "AFG", "year": 2014, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 358, "recount": 7422, "excluded": 670, "final": 10024}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": true}, {"id": "1932a2bfd61c4610bde8848897d65c2a", "name": "Pennsylvania 2024 General (Precinct, OpenElections)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "PA precinct results from OpenElections (github.com/openelections/openelections-data-pa, MIT). 9,018 precincts \u00d7 5 party buckets. VEST-equivalent geography but with the OpenElections name mapping (~358K-row source CSV). Per-precinct enrolment NOT published by Pennsylvania at this resolution; registered=valid synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "Kamala Harris (D)", "votes_republican": "Donald Trump (R)", "votes_libertarian": "Chase Oliver (L)", "votes_green": "Jill Stein (G)", "votes_other": "Other / Independent"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 9018, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T15:40:59.378208", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 9018}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a24a39a7dc554462980a1d8664d55b86", "name": "United States 2024 (U.S. Senate, MEDSL precincts)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "U.S. Senate general election (2024), precinct-level. 156,208 precincts \u00d7 5 party buckets (DEM/REP/LIB/GREEN/OTHER, where OTHER absorbs Independent + misc. parties + write-ins-by-party). Source: MEDSL Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/ZCM3BN (CC0 1.0). registered = valid synthesised (no per-precinct registration figure in MEDSL); quality_flags = ['registered_synthesised'] on every row so turnout-based tests (KHT corner) read as uninformative.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "Democratic Party (SENATE race candidate)", "votes_republican": "Republican Party (SENATE race candidate)", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian Party", "votes_green": "Green Party", "votes_other": "Other (Independent + minor parties + write-ins)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 156208, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 18551}, "n_stations_flagged": 18551, "created_at": "2026-05-18T14:59:06.238263", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 156208}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "82a62aac883b433d976dee8ce2a61911", "name": "United States 2024 (U.S. House of Representatives, MEDSL precincts)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "U.S. House of Representatives general election (2024), precinct-level. 200,461 precincts \u00d7 5 party buckets (DEM/REP/LIB/GREEN/OTHER, where OTHER absorbs Independent + misc. parties + write-ins-by-party). Source: MEDSL Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/USBYR4 (CC0 1.0). registered = valid synthesised (no per-precinct registration figure in MEDSL); quality_flags = ['registered_synthesised'] on every row so turnout-based tests (KHT corner) read as uninformative.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "Democratic Party (HOUSE race candidate)", "votes_republican": "Republican Party (HOUSE race candidate)", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian Party", "votes_green": "Green Party", "votes_other": "Other (Independent + minor parties + write-ins)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 200461, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 20365}, "n_stations_flagged": 20365, "created_at": "2026-05-18T14:05:24.167592", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 200461}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "edc6fe43e9ca46fba9adcc35bd9bc80d", "name": "United States 2024 (U.S. State Governor, MEDSL precincts)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "U.S. State Governor general election (2024), precinct-level. 30,580 precincts \u00d7 5 party buckets (DEM/REP/LIB/GREEN/OTHER, where OTHER absorbs Independent + misc. parties + write-ins-by-party). Source: MEDSL Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/DODOBJ (CC0 1.0). registered = valid synthesised (no per-precinct registration figure in MEDSL); quality_flags = ['registered_synthesised'] on every row so turnout-based tests (KHT corner) read as uninformative.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "Democratic Party (GOVERNOR race candidate)", "votes_republican": "Republican Party (GOVERNOR race candidate)", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian Party", "votes_green": "Green Party", "votes_other": "Other (Independent + minor parties + write-ins)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 30580, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 892}, "n_stations_flagged": 892, "created_at": "2026-05-18T13:55:23.920016", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 30580}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f9bf9a497a9f487d9dee43d8f53752a9", "name": "United States 2022 (U.S. Senate, MEDSL precincts)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "U.S. Senate general election (2022), precinct-level. 135,961 precincts \u00d7 5 party buckets (DEM/REP/LIB/GREEN/OTHER, where OTHER absorbs Independent + misc. parties + write-ins-by-party). Source: MEDSL Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/IAD3XR (CC0 1.0). registered = valid synthesised (no per-precinct registration figure in MEDSL); quality_flags = ['registered_synthesised'] on every row so turnout-based tests (KHT corner) read as uninformative.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "Democratic Party (SENATE race candidate)", "votes_republican": "Republican Party (SENATE race candidate)", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian Party", "votes_green": "Green Party", "votes_other": "Other (Independent + minor parties + write-ins)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 135961, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 9232}, "n_stations_flagged": 9232, "created_at": "2026-05-18T13:21:02.756963", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 135961}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5e3b40aa3b7c4168a1a6bc8c3b2c53f7", "name": "United States 2022 (U.S. House of Representatives, MEDSL precincts)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "U.S. House of Representatives general election (2022), precinct-level. 168,525 precincts \u00d7 5 party buckets (DEM/REP/LIB/GREEN/OTHER, where OTHER absorbs Independent + misc. parties + write-ins-by-party). Source: MEDSL Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/EOKNGW (CC0 1.0). registered = valid synthesised (no per-precinct registration figure in MEDSL); quality_flags = ['registered_synthesised'] on every row so turnout-based tests (KHT corner) read as uninformative.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "Democratic Party (HOUSE race candidate)", "votes_republican": "Republican Party (HOUSE race candidate)", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian Party", "votes_green": "Green Party", "votes_other": "Other (Independent + minor parties + write-ins)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 168525, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 9121}, "n_stations_flagged": 9121, "created_at": "2026-05-18T12:46:54.231042", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 168525}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "36c71ed56c224649a31fe8217fd69f7a", "name": "United States 2022 (U.S. State Governor, MEDSL precincts)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "U.S. State Governor general election (2022), precinct-level. 129,158 precincts \u00d7 5 party buckets (DEM/REP/LIB/GREEN/OTHER, where OTHER absorbs Independent + misc. parties + write-ins-by-party). Source: MEDSL Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/OAARCY (CC0 1.0). registered = valid synthesised (no per-precinct registration figure in MEDSL); quality_flags = ['registered_synthesised'] on every row so turnout-based tests (KHT corner) read as uninformative.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "Democratic Party (GOVERNOR race candidate)", "votes_republican": "Republican Party (GOVERNOR race candidate)", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian Party", "votes_green": "Green Party", "votes_other": "Other (Independent + minor parties + write-ins)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 129158, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 8097}, "n_stations_flagged": 8097, "created_at": "2026-05-18T11:45:53.359434", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 129158}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "732261c3ecfe4f838fb01846351814fb", "name": "United States 2016 (U.S. House of Representatives, MEDSL precincts)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "U.S. House of Representatives general election (2016), precinct-level. 178,725 precincts \u00d7 5 party buckets (DEM/REP/LIB/GREEN/OTHER, where OTHER absorbs Independent + misc. parties + write-ins-by-party). Source: MEDSL Dataverse doi:10.7910/DVN/PSKDUJ (CC0 1.0). registered = valid synthesised (no per-precinct registration figure in MEDSL); quality_flags = ['registered_synthesised'] on every row so turnout-based tests (KHT corner) read as uninformative.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_democrat": "Democratic Party (HOUSE race candidate)", "votes_republican": "Republican Party (HOUSE race candidate)", "votes_libertarian": "Libertarian Party", "votes_green": "Green Party", "votes_other": "Other (Independent + minor parties + write-ins)"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 178725, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 3004}, "n_stations_flagged": 3004, "created_at": "2026-05-18T10:49:01.628571", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.259, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.885, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.83, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.259, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.594, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.554, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.495, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.068, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.068, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 14.13, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 178725}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "cd632e3e4ca244e1b2975ad925f31843", "name": "United States 2016 Presidential (precinct-level, MEDSL)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2016, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "MIT MEDSL precinct-level. Candidates bucketed to Trump / Clinton / Johnson (Libertarian) / Stein (Green) / other. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised (MEDSL doesn't publish per-precinct registered/cast/invalid).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_trump": "Trump", "votes_clinton": "Clinton", "votes_johnson": "Johnson", "votes_stein": "Stein", "votes_other": "Other"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 181988, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"registered_not_positive": 3111, "votes_gt_valid": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3113, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:30:05.687204", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 178273, "n_distinct_geometry": 2837, "quality_index": 3.259, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.885, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.83, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.259, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.594, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.554, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.495, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.068, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.068, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 14.13, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {"unknown": 181988}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "33dc632d0130404d892f0f1fbdec54db", "name": "Switzerland 2023 Nationalrat (per-Gemeinde)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Swiss federal lower house (Nationalrat) 2023 election, per-Gemeinde resolution. 2,143 Gemeinden \u00d7 ~10-16 parties. Source: BFS opendata.swiss / voteinfo-app.ch. Party totals from sd-t-17.02-NRW2023-parteien.json; turnout from sd-t-17.02-NRW2023-wahlbeteiligung.json. BFS doesn't publish below Gemeinde for federal elections.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_SP": "Sp", "votes_FDP": "Fdp", "votes_SVP": "Svp", "votes_GPS": "Gps", "votes_EVP": "Evp", "votes_MITTE": "Mitte", "votes_GLP": "Glp", "votes_EDU": "Edu", "votes_PdA": "Pda", "votes_SD": "Sd", "votes_LEGA": "Lega", "votes_MCR": "Mcr", "votes_MCG": "Mcg", "votes_AUFRECHT": "Aufrecht", "votes_ANDERE_LISTEN": "Andere Listen", "votes_EAG": "Eag"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2143, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_valid_mismatch": 1286, "votes_gt_valid": 2076}, "n_stations_flagged": 2141, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:11:21.534703", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2143, "n_distinct_geometry": 28, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.884, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.838, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.559, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2143}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f1913004fd574e9ca41b3e0e4fcaef0b", "name": "Denmark 2022 Folketing (per-valgsted)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Denmark Folketingsvalg 1 November 2022, per-valgsted. Source: Danmarks Statistik BULK API table FV22TOTA. Leaf-level OMR\u00c5DE filtered (excludes national/storkreds/opstillingskreds aggregates). Party totals by letter (A-\u00c5); candidate-level personal votes dropped from canonical to keep the column count manageable.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {"votes_socialdemokratiet": "Socialdemokratiet", "votes_radikale_venstre": "Radikale Venstre", "votes_konservative": "Konservative", "votes_nye_borgerlige": "Nye Borgerlige", "votes_sf": "Sf", "votes_liberal_alliance": "Liberal Alliance", "votes_kristendemokraterne": "Kristendemokraterne", "votes_moderaterne": "Moderaterne", "votes_dansk_folkeparti": "Dansk Folkeparti", "votes_frie_groenne": "Frie Groenne", "votes_venstre": "Venstre", "votes_danmarksdemokraterne": "Danmarksdemokraterne", "votes_enhedslisten": "Enhedslisten", "votes_alternativet": "Alternativet"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1347, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:11:14.735941", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.823, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.891, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.915, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.887, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.823, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.069, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.887, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.986, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.002, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.002, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.985, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1347}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a38a104b96834d73b03a3323221eb6ff", "name": "Moldova 2024 Presidential R2 (polling-section level)", "metadata": {"country": "Moldova", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "CEC Moldova canonical results, polling-section (sec\u021bie de votare) level. 2219 sections including diaspora ('Sec\u021bii exteritoriale'). Source: a.cec.md XLSX.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_sandu_maia": "Sandu Maia", "votes_stoianoglo_alexandr": "Stoianoglo Alexandr"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2219, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:11:06.071390", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 1870, "n_distinct_geometry": 1064, "quality_index": 2.688, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.196, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.622, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.503, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.196, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.274, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.527, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.382, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.425, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.31, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.388, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.622, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.503, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.493, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.493, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.325, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.325, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.674, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2219}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "6d84e0c5350a4ec8931422ab7022d181", "name": "Moldova 2024 Presidential R1 (polling-section level)", "metadata": {"country": "Moldova", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "CEC Moldova canonical results, polling-section (sec\u021bie de votare) level. 2219 sections including diaspora ('Sec\u021bii exteritoriale'). Source: a.cec.md XLSX.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_stoianoglo_alexandr": "Stoianoglo Alexandr", "votes_sandu_maia": "Sandu Maia", "votes_usatii_renato": "Usatii Renato", "votes_tarlev_vasile": "Tarlev Vasile", "votes_vlah_irina": "Vlah Irina", "votes_chicu_ion": "Chicu Ion", "votes_nastase_andrei": "Nastase Andrei", "votes_ticu_octavian": "Ticu Octavian", "votes_furtuna_victoria": "Furtuna Victoria", "votes_ulianovschi_tudor": "Ulianovschi Tudor", "votes_morari_natalia": "Morari Natalia"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2219, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:10:57.298394", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 1870, "n_distinct_geometry": 1064, "quality_index": 2.688, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.196, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.622, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.503, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.196, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.274, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.527, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.382, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.425, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.31, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.388, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.622, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.503, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.493, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.493, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.325, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.325, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.674, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 2219}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "53c25a313cc14a97adb10dbfab5f1c66", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u5c71\u68a8\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u5c71\u68a8\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u305d\u3046\u3060\u8a18\u53f2": "\u305d\u3046\u3060\u8a18\u53f2", "votes_\u4e2d\u5cf6\u304b\u3064\u3072\u3068": "\u4e2d\u5cf6\u304b\u3064\u3072\u3068", "votes_\u4e2d\u8c37\u771f\u4e00": "\u4e2d\u8c37\u771f\u4e00", "votes_\u5800\u5185\u306e\u308a\u5b50": "\u5800\u5185\u306e\u308a\u5b50", "votes_\u5927\u4e45\u4fdd\u4ee4\u5b50": "\u5927\u4e45\u4fdd\u4ee4\u5b50", "votes_\u9ad8\u7530\u3042\u304d\u3072\u308d": "\u9ad8\u7530\u3042\u304d\u3072\u308d"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 27, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:10:53.546634", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 27, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 27}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2100c472e91742299ba956fab473c07b", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u5c71\u53e3\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u5c71\u53e3\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u306e\u3060\u304d\u3088\u3057": "\u306e\u3060\u304d\u3088\u3057", "votes_\u3075\u304d\u3042\u3052\u653f\u5b50": "\u3075\u304d\u3042\u3052\u653f\u5b50", "votes_\u307f\u3075\u3058\u7f8e\u667a\u5b50": "\u307f\u3075\u3058\u7f8e\u667a\u5b50", "votes_\u4f0a\u85e4\u535a\u6587": "\u4f0a\u85e4\u535a\u6587", "votes_\u5742\u672c\u3075\u307f\u3053": "\u5742\u672c\u3075\u307f\u3053", "votes_\u5cb8\u306e\u3076\u3061\u3088": "\u5cb8\u306e\u3076\u3061\u3088", "votes_\u5e73\u5ca1\u79c0\u592b": "\u5e73\u5ca1\u79c0\u592b", "votes_\u6797\u3088\u3057\u307e\u3055": "\u6797\u3088\u3057\u307e\u3055", "votes_\u9ad8\u6751\u6b63\u5927": "\u9ad8\u6751\u6b63\u5927"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:10:50.310882", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 19, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 19}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3d602d6b6d004051b7961ccce68d4add", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u5c71\u5f62\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u5c71\u5f62\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3048\u3093\u3069\u3046\u5229\u660e": "\u3048\u3093\u3069\u3046\u5229\u660e", "votes_\u304b\u3068\u3046\u9b8e\u5b50": "\u304b\u3068\u3046\u9b8e\u5b50", "votes_\u304d\u304f\u3061\u5927\u4e8c\u90ce": "\u304d\u304f\u3061\u5927\u4e8c\u90ce", "votes_\u3059\u305a\u304d\u306e\u308a\u304b\u305a": "\u3059\u305a\u304d\u306e\u308a\u304b\u305a", "votes_\u306b\u3068\u3046\u3079\u3068\u3046\u307e": "\u306b\u3068\u3046\u3079\u3068\u3046\u307e", "votes_\u4e09\u4e95\u5bfa\u4fee": "\u4e09\u4e95\u5bfa\u4fee", "votes_\u539f\u7530\u307e\u3055\u3072\u308d": "\u539f\u7530\u307e\u3055\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u5c71\u7530\u307e\u3082\u308b": "\u5c71\u7530\u307e\u3082\u308b", "votes_\u5ca9\u672c\u3053\u3046\u3058": "\u5ca9\u672c\u3053\u3046\u3058", "votes_\u77f3\u9ed2\u3055\u3068\u308b": "\u77f3\u9ed2\u3055\u3068\u308b"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 35, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:10:47.221760", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 35, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 35}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "440d084e7d4c47a48cfeb72067a3f155", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u548c\u6b4c\u5c71\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u548c\u6b4c\u5c71\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u304f\u3059\u3082\u3068\u6587\u90ce": "\u304f\u3059\u3082\u3068\u6587\u90ce", "votes_\u3057\u3093\u3053\u7950\u5b50": "\u3057\u3093\u3053\u7950\u5b50", "votes_\u305b\u3053\u3046\u5f18\u6210": "\u305b\u3053\u3046\u5f18\u6210", "votes_\u306b\u304b\u3044\u4f38\u5eb7": "\u306b\u304b\u3044\u4f38\u5eb7", "votes_\u4e95\u672c\u3086\u3046\u3044\u3061": "\u4e95\u672c\u3086\u3046\u3044\u3061", "votes_\u5c71\u672c\u3060\u3044\u3061": "\u5c71\u672c\u3060\u3044\u3061", "votes_\u6751\u4e0a\u306e\u308a\u3042\u3064": "\u6751\u4e0a\u306e\u308a\u3042\u3064", "votes_\u6797\u3086\u307f": "\u6797\u3086\u307f", "votes_\u6797\u5143\u307e\u3055\u305f\u304b": "\u6797\u5143\u307e\u3055\u305f\u304b", "votes_\u6b63\u53f8\u6b66": "\u6b63\u53f8\u6b66", "votes_\u9ad8\u6a4b\u3072\u3067\u3042\u304d": "\u9ad8\u6a4b\u3072\u3067\u3042\u304d"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 30, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:10:43.040258", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 30, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 30}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "1e218093727c4e6eaeeef17eda902264", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u5bcc\u5c71\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u5bcc\u5c71\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3042\u3055\u304a\u304b\u5f18\u5f66": "\u3042\u3055\u304a\u304b\u5f18\u5f66", "votes_\u304a\u304a\u304f\u307c\u5149\u592a": "\u304a\u304a\u304f\u307c\u5149\u592a", "votes_\u3053\u3057\u304b\u308f\u5eb7\u6674": "\u3053\u3057\u304b\u308f\u5eb7\u6674", "votes_\u305f\u3061\u3070\u306a\u6176\u4e00\u90ce": "\u305f\u3061\u3070\u306a\u6176\u4e00\u90ce", "votes_\u305f\u3070\u305f\u88d5\u660e": "\u305f\u3070\u305f\u88d5\u660e", "votes_\u4e0a\u7530\u82f1\u4fca": "\u4e0a\u7530\u82f1\u4fca", "votes_\u5409\u7530\u3068\u3088\u3075\u307f": "\u5409\u7530\u3068\u3088\u3075\u307f", "votes_\u5742\u672c\u3072\u308d\u3057": "\u5742\u672c\u3072\u308d\u3057", "votes_\u5c71\u3068\u3057\u3072\u308d": "\u5c71\u3068\u3057\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u6cc9\u91ce\u548c\u4e4b": "\u6cc9\u91ce\u548c\u4e4b", "votes_\u9752\u5c71\u308a\u3087\u3046\u3059\u3051": "\u9752\u5c71\u308a\u3087\u3046\u3059\u3051"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 16, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:10:39.867468", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 16, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 16}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "25daab269c2242e8b87b221d2808459a", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u9ce5\u53d6\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u9ce5\u53d6\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3042\u3055\u304f\u3089\u6d69\u4e4b": "\u3042\u3055\u304f\u3089\u6d69\u4e4b", "votes_\u5ca1\u7530\u307e\u3055\u304b\u305a": "\u5ca1\u7530\u307e\u3055\u304b\u305a", "votes_\u6e6f\u539f\u4fca\u4e8c": "\u6e6f\u539f\u4fca\u4e8c", "votes_\u77f3\u7834\u3057\u3052\u308b": "\u77f3\u7834\u3057\u3052\u308b", "votes_\u798f\u4f4f\u3072\u3067\u3086\u304d": "\u798f\u4f4f\u3072\u3067\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u8d64\u6ca2\u308a\u3087\u3046\u305b\u3044": "\u8d64\u6ca2\u308a\u3087\u3046\u305b\u3044"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:10:36.429636", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 19, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 19}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4f16a13d94904a74b244fb225866ee2c", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u6771\u4eac\u90fd", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u6771\u4eac\u90fd prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3042\u304f\u3064\u5e78\u5f66": "\u3042\u304f\u3064\u5e78\u5f66", "votes_\u3042\u3079\u7950\u7f8e\u5b50": "\u3042\u3079\u7950\u7f8e\u5b50", "votes_\u3044\u3067\u3057\u3052\u7f8e\u6d25\u5b50": "\u3044\u3067\u3057\u3052\u7f8e\u6d25\u5b50", "votes_\u3044\u306a\u3070\u592a\u90ce": "\u3044\u306a\u3070\u592a\u90ce", "votes_\u3044\u306e\u304f\u3061\u5e78\u5b50": "\u3044\u306e\u304f\u3061\u5e78\u5b50", "votes_\u3048\u3073\u3055\u308f\u7531\u7d00": "\u3048\u3073\u3055\u308f\u7531\u7d00", "votes_\u304a\u304f\u3082\u3068\u3086\u308a": "\u304a\u304f\u3082\u3068\u3086\u308a", "votes_\u304a\u3068\u304d\u305f\u99ff": "\u304a\u3068\u304d\u305f\u99ff", "votes_\u304b\u308f\u3050\u3061\u3081\u3050\u307f": "\u304b\u308f\u3050\u3061\u3081\u3050\u307f", "votes_\u304f\u3057\u3076\u3061\u4e07\u91cc": "\u304f\u3057\u3076\u3061\u4e07\u91cc", "votes_\u3055\u3044\u3068\u3046\u305f\u304b\u3086\u304d": "\u3055\u3044\u3068\u3046\u305f\u304b\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u3055\u304f\u3089\u3044\u3057\u3087\u3046\u3053": "\u3055\u304f\u3089\u3044\u3057\u3087\u3046\u3053", "votes_\u3055\u3068\u3046\u3055\u304a\u308a": "\u3055\u3068\u3046\u3055\u304a\u308a", "votes_\u3055\u3068\u3046\u7531\u7f8e": "\u3055\u3068\u3046\u7531\u7f8e", "votes_\u3057\u3093\u3069\u3046\u4f38\u592b": "\u3057\u3093\u3069\u3046\u4f38\u592b", "votes_\u3059\u304c\u308f\u3089\u4e00\u79c0": "\u3059\u304c\u308f\u3089\u4e00\u79c0", "votes_\u305f\u304b\u306e\u76f4\u7f8e": "\u305f\u304b\u306e\u76f4\u7f8e", "votes_\u305f\u3076\u3061\u6b63\u6587": "\u305f\u3076\u3061\u6b63\u6587", "votes_\u305f\u308b\u3044\u826f\u548c": "\u305f\u308b\u3044\u826f\u548c", "votes_\u306a\u304c\u3064\u307e\u662d": "\u306a\u304c\u3064\u307e\u662d", "votes_\u306c\u308b\u304d\u6d0b\u5e73": "\u306c\u308b\u304d\u6d0b\u5e73", "votes_\u306f\u304e\u3046\u3060\u5149\u4e00": "\u306f\u304e\u3046\u3060\u5149\u4e00", "votes_\u3075\u3058\u305f\u4e45\u7f8e": "\u3075\u3058\u305f\u4e45\u7f8e", "votes_\u307b\u305d\u306e\u771f\u7406": "\u307b\u305d\u306e\u771f\u7406", "votes_\u307e\u3064\u3070\u3089\u4ec1": "\u307e\u3064\u3070\u3089\u4ec1", "votes_\u3082\u304c\u307f\u3088\u3057\u306e\u308a": "\u3082\u304c\u307f\u3088\u3057\u306e\u308a", "votes_\u3088\u304f\u3089\u3055\u3086\u308a": "\u3088\u304f\u3089\u3055\u3086\u308a", "votes_\u3088\u3057\u308f\u3089\u4fee": "\u3088\u3057\u308f\u3089\u4fee", "votes_\u3088\u3060\u304b\u308c\u3093": "\u3088\u3060\u304b\u308c\u3093", "votes_\u30a4\u30cf\u307e\u3055\u306e\u308a": "\u30a4\u30cf\u307e\u3055\u306e\u308a", "votes_\u30d5\u30af\u30a4\u30b1\u30f3\u30bf": "\u30d5\u30af\u30a4\u30b1\u30f3\u30bf", "votes_\u4e09\u4e95\u3051\u3093": "\u4e09\u4e95\u3051\u3093", "votes_\u4e0b\u6751\u535a\u6587": "\u4e0b\u6751\u535a\u6587", "votes_\u4e2d\u6d25\u5ddd\u3072\u308d\u3055\u3068": "\u4e2d\u6d25\u5ddd\u3072\u308d\u3055\u3068", "votes_\u4e2d\u91ce\u3051\u3093": "\u4e2d\u91ce\u3051\u3093", "votes_\u4e38\u5ddd\u73e0\u4ee3": "\u4e38\u5ddd\u73e0\u4ee3", "votes_\u4e94\u5341\u5d50\u3048\u308a": "\u4e94\u5341\u5d50\u3048\u308a", "votes_\u4e95\u4e0a\u4fe1\u6cbb": "\u4e95\u4e0a\u4fe1\u6cbb", "votes_\u4e95\u6238\u307e\u3055\u3048": "\u4e95\u6238\u307e\u3055\u3048", "votes_\u4eca\u5ca1\u3046\u3048\u304d": "\u4eca\u5ca1\u3046\u3048\u304d", "votes_\u4eca\u6751\u5145": "\u4eca\u6751\u5145", "votes_\u4f0a\u85e4\u3057\u3085\u3093\u3059\u3051": "\u4f0a\u85e4\u3057\u3085\u3093\u3059\u3051", "votes_\u4f0a\u85e4\u306a\u306a": "\u4f0a\u85e4\u306a\u306a", "votes_\u4f0a\u85e4\u9054\u4e5f": "\u4f0a\u85e4\u9054\u4e5f", "votes_\u5186\u3088\u308a\u5b50": "\u5186\u3088\u308a\u5b50", "votes_\u5357\u5317\u3061\u3068\u305b": "\u5357\u5317\u3061\u3068\u305b", "votes_\u539f\u52aa": "\u539f\u52aa", "votes_\u5409\u5e73\u3068\u3057\u305f\u304b": "\u5409\u5e73\u3068\u3057\u305f\u304b", "votes_\u5409\u7530\u306f\u308b\u307f": "\u5409\u7530\u306f\u308b\u307f", "votes_\u5409\u7530\u572d\u4e00\u90ce": "\u5409\u7530\u572d\u4e00\u90ce", "votes_\u548c\u7530\u6b63\u5b50": "\u548c\u7530\u6b63\u5b50", "votes_\u571f\u5c4b\u307f\u308f": "\u571f\u5c4b\u307f\u308f", "votes_\u571f\u7530\u3057\u3093": "\u571f\u7530\u3057\u3093", "votes_\u5869\u5bfa\u3086\u3046\u305f": "\u5869\u5bfa\u3086\u3046\u305f", "votes_\u5927\u304f\u307e\u5229\u662d": "\u5927\u304f\u307e\u5229\u662d", "votes_\u5927\u585a\u7d00\u4e45\u96c4": "\u5927\u585a\u7d00\u4e45\u96c4", "votes_\u5927\u68ee\u7d00\u660e": "\u5927\u68ee\u7d00\u660e", "votes_\u5927\u6cb3\u5185\u3057\u3052\u305f": "\u5927\u6cb3\u5185\u3057\u3052\u305f", "votes_\u5927\u6cb3\u539f\u307e\u3055\u3053": "\u5927\u6cb3\u539f\u307e\u3055\u3053", "votes_\u5927\u6d25\u3042\u3084\u304b": "\u5927\u6d25\u3042\u3084\u304b", "votes_\u5927\u7a7a\u3053\u3046\u304d": "\u5927\u7a7a\u3053\u3046\u304d", "votes_\u5927\u897f\u3051\u3093\u305f\u308d\u3046": "\u5927\u897f\u3051\u3093\u305f\u308d\u3046", "votes_\u5927\u897f\u6d0b\u5e73": "\u5927\u897f\u6d0b\u5e73", "votes_\u5927\u8c46\u751f\u7530\u307f\u306e\u308b": "\u5927\u8c46\u751f\u7530\u307f\u306e\u308b", "votes_\u5927\u8cc0\u3084\u3059\u308d\u3046": "\u5927\u8cc0\u3084\u3059\u308d\u3046", "votes_\u5965\u6751\u3088\u3057\u3072\u308d": "\u5965\u6751\u3088\u3057\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u5b89\u7530\u3057\u3093": "\u5b89\u7530\u3057\u3093", "votes_\u5b89\u85e4\u305f\u304b\u304a": "\u5b89\u85e4\u305f\u304b\u304a", "votes_\u5bae\u672c\u5fb9": "\u5bae\u672c\u5fb9", "votes_\u5bae\u672c\u6804": "\u5bae\u672c\u6804", "votes_\u5bae\ufa11\u305f\u308d\u3046": "\u5bae\ufa11\u305f\u308d\u3046", "votes_\u5c0f\u5824\u6771": "\u5c0f\u5824\u6771", "votes_\u5c0f\u7530\u539f\u304d\u3088\u3057": "\u5c0f\u7530\u539f\u304d\u3088\u3057", "votes_\u5c0f\u91ce\u305f\u3044\u3059\u3051": "\u5c0f\u91ce\u305f\u3044\u3059\u3051", "votes_\u5c71\u4e0b\u3088\u3046\u3053": "\u5c71\u4e0b\u3088\u3046\u3053", "votes_\u5c71\u5cb8\u4e00\u751f": "\u5c71\u5cb8\u4e00\u751f", "votes_\u5c71\u7530\u307f\u304d": "\u5c71\u7530\u307f\u304d", "votes_\u5c71\u82b1\u90c1\u592b": "\u5c71\u82b1\u90c1\u592b", "votes_\u5ca1\u672c\u307f\u3064\u306a\u308a": "\u5ca1\u672c\u307f\u3064\u306a\u308a", "votes_\u5e73\u5c06\u660e": "\u5e73\u5c06\u660e", "votes_\u5e73\u6ca2\u52dd\u6804": "\u5e73\u6ca2\u52dd\u6804", "votes_\u5e73\u91ce\u3088\u3057\u305f\u304b": "\u5e73\u91ce\u3088\u3057\u305f\u304b", "votes_\u5fb3\u6c38\u3086\u304d\u3053": "\u5fb3\u6c38\u3086\u304d\u3053", "votes_\u624b\u585a\u3088\u3057\u304a": "\u624b\u585a\u3088\u3057\u304a", "votes_\u6589\u85e4\u304b\u3088": "\u6589\u85e4\u304b\u3088", "votes_\u4e95\u6749\u751f": "\u4e95\u6749\u751f", "votes_\u57a3\u5b8f": "\u57a3\u5b8f", "votes_\u65e9\u5ddd\u304b\u3093": "\u65e9\u5ddd\u304b\u3093", "votes_\u6709\u7530\u307e\u3055\u3068\u3057": "\u6709\u7530\u307e\u3055\u3068\u3057", "votes_\u6709\u7530\u82b3\u751f": "\u6709\u7530\u82b3\u751f", "votes_\u671b\u6708\u307e\u3055\u306e\u308a": "\u671b\u6708\u307e\u3055\u306e\u308a", "votes_\u6728\u539f\u8aa0\u4e8c": "\u6728\u539f\u8aa0\u4e8c", "votes_\u6728\u6751\u305f\u3051\u3064\u304b": "\u6728\u6751\u305f\u3051\u3064\u304b", "votes_\u672b\u677e\u7fa9\u898f": "\u672b\u677e\u7fa9\u898f", "votes_\u677e\u4e0b\u73b2\u5b50": "\u677e\u4e0b\u73b2\u5b50", "votes_\u677e\u5c3e\u3042\u304d\u3072\u308d": "\u677e\u5c3e\u3042\u304d\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u677e\u5cf6\u307f\u3069\u308a": "\u677e\u5cf6\u307f\u3069\u308a", "votes_\u677e\u672c\u5065\u592a": "\u677e\u672c\u5065\u592a", "votes_\u677e\u672c\u6d0b\u5e73": "\u677e\u672c\u6d0b\u5e73", "votes_\u6797\u308a\u307e": "\u6797\u308a\u307e", "votes_\u67f4\u7530\u304b\u3064\u3086\u304d": "\u67f4\u7530\u304b\u3064\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u68ee\u3086\u3046\u3044\u3061": "\u68ee\u3086\u3046\u3044\u3061", "votes_\u68ee\u3088\u3046\u3059\u3051": "\u68ee\u3088\u3046\u3059\u3051", "votes_\u690d\u6728\u3072\u308d\u305f\u304b": "\u690d\u6728\u3072\u308d\u305f\u304b", "votes_\u6a0b\u53e3\u307e\u3053\u3068": "\u6a0b\u53e3\u307e\u3053\u3068", "votes_\u6b66\u7530\u3086\u3046\u3044\u3061\u308d\u3046": "\u6b66\u7530\u3086\u3046\u3044\u3061\u308d\u3046", "votes_\u6c38\u91ce\u3072\u308d\u5b50": "\u6c38\u91ce\u3072\u308d\u5b50", "votes_\u6c5f\u5d0e\u3055\u306a\u3048": "\u6c5f\u5d0e\u3055\u306a\u3048", "votes_\u6c60\u7530\u516c\u4e09": "\u6c60\u7530\u516c\u4e09", "votes_\u6ca2\u7530\u3057\u3093\u3054": "\u6ca2\u7530\u3057\u3093\u3054", "votes_\u6cb3\u6751\u5efa\u4e00": "\u6cb3\u6751\u5efa\u4e00", "votes_\u6d66\u5ddd\u3086\u3046\u3059\u3051": "\u6d66\u5ddd\u3086\u3046\u3059\u3051", "votes_\u6d77\u6c5f\u7530\u4e07\u91cc": "\u6d77\u6c5f\u7530\u4e07\u91cc", "votes_\u7530\u539f\u8056\u5b50": "\u7530\u539f\u8056\u5b50", "votes_\u7551\u5c3b\u6587\u592b": "\u7551\u5c3b\u6587\u592b", "votes_\u77f3\u5009\u3053\u3046\u3058\u308d\u3046": "\u77f3\u5009\u3053\u3046\u3058\u308d\u3046", "votes_\u77f3\u539f\u3072\u308d\u305f\u304b": "\u77f3\u539f\u3072\u308d\u305f\u304b", "votes_\u77f3\u5ddd\u307e\u3055\u3068\u3057": "\u77f3\u5ddd\u307e\u3055\u3068\u3057", "votes_\u77f3\u5ddd\u3081\u3044\u5b50": "\u77f3\u5ddd\u3081\u3044\u5b50", "votes_\u77f3\u5ddd\u3086\u308a\u304b": "\u77f3\u5ddd\u3086\u308a\u304b", "votes_\u798f\u7530\u304b\u304a\u308b": "\u798f\u7530\u304b\u304a\u308b", "votes_\u82e5\u5bae\u3051\u3093\u3058": "\u82e5\u5bae\u3051\u3093\u3058", "votes_\u5408\u8cb4\u4e4b": "\u5408\u8cb4\u4e4b", "votes_\u85e4\u5ddd\u305f\u304b\u3057": "\u85e4\u5ddd\u305f\u304b\u3057", "votes_\u8c37\u5ddd\u667a\u884c": "\u8c37\u5ddd\u667a\u884c", "votes_\u8fbb\u6e05\u4eba": "\u8fbb\u6e05\u4eba", "votes_\u9152\u4e95\u306a\u3064\u307f": "\u9152\u4e95\u306a\u3064\u307f", "votes_\u91cd\u7530\u3058\u3085\u3093\u307a\u3044": "\u91cd\u7530\u3058\u3085\u3093\u307a\u3044", "votes_\u91d1\u6fa4\u3086\u3044": "\u91d1\u6fa4\u3086\u3044", "votes_\u9234\u6728\u3051\u3093\u3044\u3061": "\u9234\u6728\u3051\u3093\u3044\u3061", "votes_\u9234\u6728\u307f\u304b": "\u9234\u6728\u307f\u304b", "votes_\u9234\u6728\u3088\u3046\u3059\u3051": "\u9234\u6728\u3088\u3046\u3059\u3051", "votes_\u9234\u6728\u96bc\u4eba": "\u9234\u6728\u96bc\u4eba", "votes_\u9577\u5cf6\u662d\u4e45": "\u9577\u5cf6\u662d\u4e45", "votes_\u9580\u3072\u308d\u3053": "\u9580\u3072\u308d\u3053", "votes_\u963f\u90e8\u53f8": "\u963f\u90e8\u53f8", "votes_\u9808\u85e4\u5143\u6c17": "\u9808\u85e4\u5143\u6c17", "votes_\u9999\u897f\u304b\u3064\u4ecb": "\u9999\u897f\u304b\u3064\u4ecb", "votes_\u9ad8\u6728\u3051\u3044": "\u9ad8\u6728\u3051\u3044", "votes_\u9ad8\u6728\u3072\u308d\u3057": "\u9ad8\u6728\u3072\u308d\u3057", "votes_\u9ad8\u677e\u3055\u3068\u3057": "\u9ad8\u677e\u3055\u3068\u3057", "votes_\u9ce9\u5c71\u7d00\u4e00\u90ce": "\u9ce9\u5c71\u7d00\u4e00\u90ce", "votes_\u9ed2\u5d0e\u7950\u4e00": "\u9ed2\u5d0e\u7950\u4e00", "votes_AI\u30e1\u30a4\u30e4\u30fc": "AI\u30e1\u30a4\u30e4\u30fc"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 70, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:10:33.235088", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 70, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 70}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d7feb5f9ab6f47b08c74a79fe3b7bf3b", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u5fb3\u5cf6\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u5fb3\u5cf6\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u306f\u307e\u5171\u751f": "\u306f\u307e\u5171\u751f", "votes_\u4e45\u4fdd\u305f\u304b\u3086\u304d": "\u4e45\u4fdd\u305f\u304b\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u4ec1\u6728\u535a\u6587": "\u4ec1\u6728\u535a\u6587", "votes_\u4f50\u85e4\u884c\u4fca": "\u4f50\u85e4\u884c\u4fca", "votes_\u5409\u7530\u3068\u3082\u4ee3": "\u5409\u7530\u3068\u3082\u4ee3", "votes_\u5c71\u53e3\u4fca\u4e00": "\u5c71\u53e3\u4fca\u4e00", "votes_\u795d\u8061": "\u795d\u8061", "votes_\u98ef\u6cc9\u304b\u3082\u3093": "\u98ef\u6cc9\u304b\u3082\u3093", "votes_\u9ad8\u6a4b\u3048\u3044": "\u9ad8\u6a4b\u3048\u3044"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 24, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:10:29.091939", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 24, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 24}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "60b0762360384d96a021204eebc034d3", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u6803\u6728\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u6803\u6728\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3044\u304c\u3089\u3057\u6e05": "\u3044\u304c\u3089\u3057\u6e05", "votes_\u3044\u304c\u592e": "\u3044\u304c\u592e", "votes_\u3055\u3068\u3046\u52c9": "\u3055\u3068\u3046\u52c9", "votes_\u3084\u3053\u3046\u52d8\u53f8": "\u3084\u3053\u3046\u52d8\u53f8", "votes_\u3084\u306a\u548c\u751f": "\u3084\u306a\u548c\u751f", "votes_\u4e80\u5c71\u967d\u4e09": "\u4e80\u5c71\u967d\u4e09", "votes_\u5ca1\u6751\u3051\u3044\u5b50": "\u5ca1\u6751\u3051\u3044\u5b50", "votes_\u5ddd\u4e0a\u3072\u3068\u3057": "\u5ddd\u4e0a\u3072\u3068\u3057", "votes_\u677f\u6d25\u3086\u304b": "\u677f\u6d25\u3086\u304b", "votes_\u67cf\u5009\u3086\u3046\u3058": "\u67cf\u5009\u3086\u3046\u3058", "votes_\u6e21\u8fba\u3057\u3093\u305f\u308d\u3046": "\u6e21\u8fba\u3057\u3093\u305f\u308d\u3046", "votes_\u798f\u7530\u3042\u304d\u304a": "\u798f\u7530\u3042\u304d\u304a", "votes_\u8239\u7530\u306f\u3058\u3081": "\u8239\u7530\u306f\u3058\u3081", "votes_\u8302\u6728\u3068\u3057\u307f\u3064": "\u8302\u6728\u3068\u3057\u307f\u3064", "votes_\u85e4\u5ca1\u305f\u304b\u304a": "\u85e4\u5ca1\u305f\u304b\u304a", "votes_\u9752\u6728\u3072\u308d\u3057": "\u9752\u6728\u3072\u308d\u3057"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 26, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:10:26.144169", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 26, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 26}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "5589a78f769241239da8ec7c75f9412c", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u9759\u5ca1\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u9759\u5ca1\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3044\u306a\u3070\u3060\u3044\u3059\u3051": "\u3044\u306a\u3070\u3060\u3044\u3059\u3051", "votes_\u304b\u3064\u307e\u305f\u5b5d\u660e": "\u304b\u3064\u307e\u305f\u5b5d\u660e", "votes_\u304b\u307e\u3057\u305f\u7531\u4f73\u5b50": "\u304b\u307e\u3057\u305f\u7531\u4f73\u5b50", "votes_\u304b\u307f\u304b\u308f\u967d\u5b50": "\u304b\u307f\u304b\u308f\u967d\u5b50", "votes_\u3052\u3093\u307e\u3051\u3093\u305f\u308d\u3046": "\u3052\u3093\u307e\u3051\u3093\u305f\u308d\u3046", "votes_\u3055\u3052\u3055\u304b\u5927\u4ecb": "\u3055\u3052\u3055\u304b\u5927\u4ecb", "votes_\u3068\u3084\u307e\u304b\u305a\u3086\u304d": "\u3068\u3084\u307e\u304b\u305a\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u3072\u3089\u304c\u9ad8\u6210": "\u3072\u3089\u304c\u9ad8\u6210", "votes_\u3075\u304b\u3056\u308f\u967d\u4e00": "\u3075\u304b\u3056\u308f\u967d\u4e00", "votes_\u308f\u305f\u306a\u3079\u5468": "\u308f\u305f\u306a\u3079\u5468", "votes_\u4e0b\u5c71\u304b\u305a\u307f": "\u4e0b\u5c71\u304b\u305a\u307f", "votes_\u4e95\u6797\u305f\u3064\u306e\u308a": "\u4e95\u6797\u305f\u3064\u306e\u308a", "votes_\u51a8\u8c37\u3053\u3046\u3059\u3051": "\u51a8\u8c37\u3053\u3046\u3059\u3051", "votes_\u52a0\u85e4\u3088\u3057\u3072\u3055": "\u52a0\u85e4\u3088\u3057\u3072\u3055", "votes_\u5409\u5ddd\u306a\u304a\u3053": "\u5409\u5ddd\u306a\u304a\u3053", "votes_\u57ce\u5185\u307f\u306e\u308b": "\u57ce\u5185\u307f\u306e\u308b", "votes_\u5bae\u6ca2\u3072\u308d\u3086\u304d": "\u5bae\u6ca2\u3072\u308d\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u5bfa\u5cf6\u307f\u305a\u3072\u3068": "\u5bfa\u5cf6\u307f\u305a\u3072\u3068", "votes_\u5c0f\u5c71\u306e\u3076\u3072\u308d": "\u5c0f\u5c71\u306e\u3076\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u5c71\u4e0b\u3053\u3046\u304d": "\u5c71\u4e0b\u3053\u3046\u304d", "votes_\u5c71\u672c\u3086\u3046\u305e\u3046": "\u5c71\u672c\u3086\u3046\u305e\u3046", "votes_\u65e5\u5409\u96c4\u592a": "\u65e5\u5409\u96c4\u592a", "votes_\u6749\u6751\u3088\u3057\u304a": "\u6749\u6751\u3088\u3057\u304a", "votes_\u7530\u4e2d\u3051\u3093": "\u7530\u4e2d\u3051\u3093", "votes_\u7d30\u91ce\u8c6a\u5fd7": "\u7d30\u91ce\u8c6a\u5fd7", "votes_\u9234\u6728\u305b\u3064\u5b50": "\u9234\u6728\u305b\u3064\u5b50", "votes_\u9234\u6728\u305f\u3051\u3086\u304d": "\u9234\u6728\u305f\u3051\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u9234\u6728\u3088\u3057\u3072\u308d": "\u9234\u6728\u3088\u3057\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u9ad8\u6a4b\u307f\u307b": "\u9ad8\u6a4b\u307f\u307b"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 41, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:10:23.061594", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 41, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 41}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "0539878b3f0e4e3bad6677c69a28f601", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u5cf6\u6839\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u5cf6\u6839\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u305f\u304b\u304c\u3044\u6075\u7f8e\u5b50": "\u305f\u304b\u304c\u3044\u6075\u7f8e\u5b50", "votes_\u3080\u3089\u307b\u3048\u308a\u3053": "\u3080\u3089\u307b\u3048\u308a\u3053", "votes_\u4e80\u4e95\u4e9c\u7d00\u5b50": "\u4e80\u4e95\u4e9c\u7d00\u5b50", "votes_\u4e80\u8c37\u3086\u3046\u5b50": "\u4e80\u8c37\u3086\u3046\u5b50", "votes_\u5927\u585a\u3055\u3068\u3053": "\u5927\u585a\u3055\u3068\u3053", "votes_\u9ad8\u898b\u3084\u3059\u3072\u308d": "\u9ad8\u898b\u3084\u3059\u3072\u308d"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:10:19.715356", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 19, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 19}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ac4075fb5127446ea60aba402a6dcb43", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u6ecb\u8cc0\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u6ecb\u8cc0\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3046\u3048\u306e\u8ce2\u4e00\u90ce": "\u3046\u3048\u306e\u8ce2\u4e00\u90ce", "votes_\u304d\u306e\u305b\u660e\u5b50": "\u304d\u306e\u305b\u660e\u5b50", "votes_\u3067\u3058\u3057\u3093\u3054": "\u3067\u3058\u3057\u3093\u3054", "votes_\u3068\u304f\u306a\u304c\u4e45\u5fd7": "\u3068\u304f\u306a\u304c\u4e45\u5fd7", "votes_\u4f50\u85e4\u3053\u3046\u3078\u3044": "\u4f50\u85e4\u3053\u3046\u3078\u3044", "votes_\u5317\u91ce\u3086\u3046\u3053": "\u5317\u91ce\u3086\u3046\u3053", "votes_\u5927\u5ca1\u3068\u3057\u305f\u304b": "\u5927\u5ca1\u3068\u3057\u305f\u304b", "votes_\u5e73\u5c3e\u307f\u3061\u304a": "\u5e73\u5c3e\u307f\u3061\u304a", "votes_\u658e\u85e4\u30a2\u30ec\u30c3\u30af\u30b9": "\u658e\u85e4\u30a2\u30ec\u30c3\u30af\u30b9", "votes_\u6b66\u6751\u306e\u3076\u3072\u3067": "\u6b66\u6751\u306e\u3076\u3072\u3067"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:10:15.420783", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 19, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 19}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ed0fcb1da34745918f03479f5577c39f", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u57fc\u7389\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u57fc\u7389\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3042\u3055\u306e\u3081\u7fa9\u82f1": "\u3042\u3055\u306e\u3081\u7fa9\u82f1", "votes_\u3044\u3061\u304d\u4f34\u5b50": "\u3044\u3061\u304d\u4f34\u5b50", "votes_\u3044\u3061\u306e\u4e00\u99ac": "\u3044\u3061\u306e\u4e00\u99ac", "votes_\u3044\u306e\u307e\u305f\u5609\u76f4": "\u3044\u306e\u307e\u305f\u5609\u76f4", "votes_\u3048\u3060\u306e\u5e78\u7537": "\u3048\u3060\u306e\u5e78\u7537", "votes_\u304a\u304f\u3060\u667a\u5b50": "\u304a\u304f\u3060\u667a\u5b50", "votes_\u304d\u304b\u308f\u3060\u3072\u3068\u3057": "\u304d\u304b\u308f\u3060\u3072\u3068\u3057", "votes_\u3053\u307f\u3084\u307e\u6cf0\u5b50": "\u3053\u307f\u3084\u307e\u6cf0\u5b50", "votes_\u3057\u3070\u3084\u307e\u660c\u5f66": "\u3057\u3070\u3084\u307e\u660c\u5f66", "votes_\u3057\u3093\u3069\u3046\u7fa9\u5b5d": "\u3057\u3093\u3069\u3046\u7fa9\u5b5d", "votes_\u3059\u304e\u3080\u3089\u614e\u6cbb": "\u3059\u304e\u3080\u3089\u614e\u6cbb", "votes_\u305b\u304d\u306d\u304b\u305a\u3084": "\u305b\u304d\u306d\u304b\u305a\u3084", "votes_\u305f\u3051\u307e\u3055\u516c\u4e00": "\u305f\u3051\u307e\u3055\u516c\u4e00", "votes_\u3064\u3061\u3084\u54c1\u5b50": "\u3064\u3061\u3084\u54c1\u5b50", "votes_\u306a\u3048\u3080\u3089\u4eac\u5b50": "\u306a\u3048\u3080\u3089\u4eac\u5b50", "votes_\u306a\u304c\u307b\u308a\u5065": "\u306a\u304c\u307b\u308a\u5065", "votes_\u3070\u3070\u3072\u308d\u3057": "\u3070\u3070\u3072\u308d\u3057", "votes_\u307b\u3055\u304b\u3084\u3059\u3057": "\u307b\u3055\u304b\u3084\u3059\u3057", "votes_\u307b\u305d\u3084\u307f\u3048\u3053": "\u307b\u305d\u3084\u307f\u3048\u3053", "votes_\u307e\u3064\u3046\u3089\u7384\u55e3": "\u307e\u3064\u3046\u3089\u7384\u55e3", "votes_\u3082\u308a\u3084\u5343\u6d25\u5b50": "\u3082\u308a\u3084\u5343\u6d25\u5b50", "votes_\u4e09\u30c3\u6797\u3072\u308d\u307f": "\u4e09\u30c3\u6797\u3072\u308d\u307f", "votes_\u4e09\u4e0a\u304d\u3087\u3046\u3078\u3044": "\u4e09\u4e0a\u304d\u3087\u3046\u3078\u3044", "votes_\u4e09\u89d2\u305d\u3046\u305f": "\u4e09\u89d2\u305d\u3046\u305f", "votes_\u4e2d\u539f\u3088\u3057\u3080\u306d": "\u4e2d\u539f\u3088\u3057\u3080\u306d", "votes_\u4e2d\u6751\u308a\u304b": "\u4e2d\u6751\u308a\u304b", "votes_\u4e2d\u6839\u304b\u305a\u3086\u304d": "\u4e2d\u6839\u304b\u305a\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u4e2d\u91ce\u3072\u3067\u3086\u304d": "\u4e2d\u91ce\u3072\u3067\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u4f0a\u52e2\u7530\u307f\u3061\u3053": "\u4f0a\u52e2\u7530\u307f\u3061\u3053", "votes_\u4f50\u85e4\u304b\u305a\u307e": "\u4f50\u85e4\u304b\u305a\u307e", "votes_\u52a0\u6765\u305f\u3051\u3088\u3057": "\u52a0\u6765\u305f\u3051\u3088\u3057", "votes_\u5742\u672c\u3086\u3046\u306e\u3059\u3051": "\u5742\u672c\u3086\u3046\u306e\u3059\u3051", "votes_\u5927\u585a\u62d3": "\u5927\u585a\u62d3", "votes_\u5927\u5cf6\u3042\u3064\u3057": "\u5927\u5cf6\u3042\u3064\u3057", "votes_\u5c0f\u6cc9\u308a\u3085\u3046\u3058": "\u5c0f\u6cc9\u308a\u3085\u3046\u3058", "votes_\u5c71\u53e3\u3059\u3059\u3080": "\u5c71\u53e3\u3059\u3059\u3080", "votes_\u5c71\u672c\u3086\u3046\u5b50": "\u5c71\u672c\u3086\u3046\u5b50", "votes_\u5cb8\u7530\u5149\u5e83": "\u5cb8\u7530\u5149\u5e83", "votes_\u5cf6\u7530\u8aa0": "\u5cf6\u7530\u8aa0", "votes_\u5de5\u85e4\u304b\u304a\u308b": "\u5de5\u85e4\u304b\u304a\u308b", "votes_\u5e73\u4e95\u660e\u7f8e": "\u5e73\u4e95\u660e\u7f8e", "votes_\u6751\u4e95\u3072\u3067\u304d": "\u6751\u4e95\u3072\u3067\u304d", "votes_\u67ff\u6cbc\u306f\u308b\u304d": "\u67ff\u6cbc\u306f\u308b\u304d", "votes_\u68ee\u7530\u3068\u3057\u304b\u305a": "\u68ee\u7530\u3068\u3057\u304b\u305a", "votes_\u6a4b\u672c\u3079\u3093": "\u6a4b\u672c\u3079\u3093", "votes_\u6a4b\u672c\u307f\u304d\u3072\u3053": "\u6a4b\u672c\u307f\u304d\u3072\u3053", "votes_\u6ca2\u53e3\u3061\u3048\u5b50": "\u6ca2\u53e3\u3061\u3048\u5b50", "votes_\u6ca2\u7530\u826f": "\u6ca2\u7530\u826f", "votes_\u6cb3\u5408\u3086\u3046\u3059\u3051": "\u6cb3\u5408\u3086\u3046\u3059\u3051", "votes_\u6d25\u6751\u5927\u4f5c": "\u6d25\u6751\u5927\u4f5c", "votes_\u6e21\u8fba\u3084\u3059\u3086\u304d": "\u6e21\u8fba\u3084\u3059\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u7267\u539f\u3072\u3067\u304d": "\u7267\u539f\u3072\u3067\u304d", "votes_\u7530\u4e2d\u826f\u751f": "\u7530\u4e2d\u826f\u751f", "votes_\u77e2\u91ce\u3086\u304d\u5b50": "\u77e2\u91ce\u3086\u304d\u5b50", "votes_\u77f3\u4e95\u5553\u4e00": "\u77f3\u4e95\u5553\u4e00", "votes_\u77f3\u5ddd\u305f\u304b\u307f": "\u77f3\u5ddd\u305f\u304b\u307f", "votes_\u79cb\u5c71\u3082\u3048": "\u79cb\u5c71\u3082\u3048", "votes_\u7af9\u5185\u5343\u6625": "\u7af9\u5185\u5343\u6625", "votes_\u8fbb\u6751\u3061\u3072\u308d": "\u8fbb\u6751\u3061\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u8fd1\u85e4\u3072\u3067\u307e\u3055": "\u8fd1\u85e4\u3072\u3067\u307e\u3055", "votes_\u91ce\u4e2d\u3042\u3064\u3057": "\u91ce\u4e2d\u3042\u3064\u3057", "votes_\u9234\u6728\u3088\u3057\u3072\u308d": "\u9234\u6728\u3088\u3057\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u9ad8\u4e95\u305f\u304b\u3057": "\u9ad8\u4e95\u305f\u304b\u3057", "votes_\u9ad8\u6728\u308c\u3093\u305f\u308d\u3046": "\u9ad8\u6728\u308c\u3093\u305f\u308d\u3046", "votes_\u9ad8\u6a4b\u3084\u3059\u3057": "\u9ad8\u6a4b\u3084\u3059\u3057", "votes_\u9ad8\u6a4b\u82f1\u660e": "\u9ad8\u6a4b\u82f1\u660e"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 73, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:10:10.970601", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 73, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 73}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4dd31d99e49a4132abc90a15a3b461f3", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u4f50\u8cc0\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u4f50\u8cc0\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3057\u3082\u3072\u3054\u3057\u512a\u4e5f": "\u3057\u3082\u3072\u3054\u3057\u512a\u4e5f", "votes_\u4e95\u4e0a\u3086\u3046\u3059\u3051": "\u4e95\u4e0a\u3086\u3046\u3059\u3051", "votes_\u539f\u53e3\u4e00\u535a": "\u539f\u53e3\u4e00\u535a", "votes_\u53e4\u5ddd\u3084\u3059\u3057": "\u53e4\u5ddd\u3084\u3059\u3057", "votes_\u5927\u4e32\u3072\u308d\u3057": "\u5927\u4e32\u3072\u308d\u3057", "votes_\u5ca9\u7530\u304b\u305a\u3061\u304b": "\u5ca9\u7530\u304b\u305a\u3061\u304b"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:10:06.724495", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 20, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 20}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "28cd92926c714fd4b2c153305559ca11", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u5927\u962a\u5e9c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u5927\u962a\u5e9c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3042\u304a\u3084\u304e\u4ec1\u58eb": "\u3042\u304a\u3084\u304e\u4ec1\u58eb", "votes_\u3044\u3055\u9032\u4e00": "\u3044\u3055\u9032\u4e00", "votes_\u3044\u3068\u3046\u4fe1\u4e45": "\u3044\u3068\u3046\u4fe1\u4e45", "votes_\u3046\u3089\u306e\u9756\u4eba": "\u3046\u3089\u306e\u9756\u4eba", "votes_\u3046\u308b\u307e\u8b72\u53f8": "\u3046\u308b\u307e\u8b72\u53f8", "votes_\u304b\u306e\u3046\u967d\u4e4b\u52a9": "\u304b\u306e\u3046\u967d\u4e4b\u52a9", "votes_\u304b\u308f\u305d\u3048\u305f\u3064\u307e": "\u304b\u308f\u305d\u3048\u305f\u3064\u307e", "votes_\u3053\u3046\u3089\u3044\u5553\u4e00\u90ce": "\u3053\u3046\u3089\u3044\u5553\u4e00\u90ce", "votes_\u3055\u304b\u3044\u3089\u3093\u306a": "\u3055\u304b\u3044\u3089\u3093\u306a", "votes_\u305f\u304b\u3089\u3044\u3066\u308b\u307f": "\u305f\u304b\u3089\u3044\u3066\u308b\u307f", "votes_\u3061\u3085\u3046\u3058\u3087\u3046\u6804\u592a\u90ce": "\u3061\u3085\u3046\u3058\u3087\u3046\u6804\u592a\u90ce", "votes_\u3068\u304b\u3057\u304d\u306a\u304a\u307f": "\u3068\u304b\u3057\u304d\u306a\u304a\u307f", "votes_\u306a\u304c\u3055\u304d\u7531\u7f8e\u5b50": "\u306a\u304c\u3055\u304d\u7531\u7f8e\u5b50", "votes_\u306f\u304e\u306f\u3089\u4ec1": "\u306f\u304e\u306f\u3089\u4ec1", "votes_\u306f\u304e\u539f\u3051\u3044": "\u306f\u304e\u539f\u3051\u3044", "votes_\u307e\u3064\u3046\u3089\u305f\u3051\u3057": "\u307e\u3064\u3046\u3089\u305f\u3051\u3057", "votes_\u3080\u306d\u304d\u3088\u7687\u4e00": "\u3080\u306d\u304d\u3088\u7687\u4e00", "votes_\u3084\u306f\u305f\u611b": "\u3084\u306f\u305f\u611b", "votes_\u308f\u305f\u3057\u8003\u4e00": "\u308f\u305f\u3057\u8003\u4e00", "votes_\u308f\u305f\u306a\u3079\u7d50": "\u308f\u305f\u306a\u3079\u7d50", "votes_\u30df\u30ce\u30d9\u30c6\u30eb\u30aa": "\u30df\u30ce\u30d9\u30c6\u30eb\u30aa", "votes_\u4e2d\u53f8\u5b8f": "\u4e2d\u53f8\u5b8f", "votes_\u4e2d\u5c71\u6cf0\u79c0": "\u4e2d\u5c71\u6cf0\u79c0", "votes_\u4e95\u4e0a\u82f1\u5b5d": "\u4e95\u4e0a\u82f1\u5b5d", "votes_\u4ef2\u5ddd\u307e\u306a\u3076": "\u4ef2\u5ddd\u307e\u306a\u3076", "votes_\u4f50\u85e4\u3057\u3052\u304d": "\u4f50\u85e4\u3057\u3052\u304d", "votes_\u5185\u7530\u305f\u304b\u3064\u3050": "\u5185\u7530\u305f\u304b\u3064\u3050", "votes_\u5185\u85e4\u3053\u3046\u3044\u3061": "\u5185\u85e4\u3053\u3046\u3044\u3061", "votes_\u5317\u5c3e\u307e\u306a\u3076": "\u5317\u5c3e\u307e\u306a\u3076", "votes_\u5317\u5ddd\u664b\u5e73": "\u5317\u5ddd\u664b\u5e73", "votes_\u5317\u6751\u307f\u304d": "\u5317\u6751\u307f\u304d", "votes_\u56fd\u91cd\u3068\u304a\u308b": "\u56fd\u91cd\u3068\u304a\u308b", "votes_\u5800\u5185\u305f\u304b\u304a": "\u5800\u5185\u305f\u304b\u304a", "votes_\u5869\u5ddd\u61b2\u53f2": "\u5869\u5ddd\u61b2\u53f2", "votes_\u5927\u77f3\u3042\u304d\u3053": "\u5927\u77f3\u3042\u304d\u3053", "votes_\u5927\u897f\u3072\u308d\u3086\u304d": "\u5927\u897f\u3072\u308d\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u5927\u8fbb\u3055\u3084": "\u5927\u8fbb\u3055\u3084", "votes_\u592a\u7530\u3068\u304a\u308b": "\u592a\u7530\u3068\u304a\u308b", "votes_\u5965\u4e0b\u305f\u3051\u307f\u3064": "\u5965\u4e0b\u305f\u3051\u307f\u3064", "votes_\u5b88\u5cf6\u6b63": "\u5b88\u5cf6\u6b63", "votes_\u5bae\u51fa\u3061\u3055\u3068": "\u5bae\u51fa\u3061\u3055\u3068", "votes_\u5bae\u672c\u305f\u3051\u3057": "\u5bae\u672c\u305f\u3051\u3057", "votes_\u5bfa\u5ddd\u5e78\u751f\u6804": "\u5bfa\u5ddd\u5e78\u751f\u6804", "votes_\u5c0f\u5ddd\u967d\u592a": "\u5c0f\u5ddd\u967d\u592a", "votes_\u5c3e\u8fbb\u304b\u306a\u5b50": "\u5c3e\u8fbb\u304b\u306a\u5b50", "votes_\u5c71\u672c\u304b\u306a\u3048": "\u5c71\u672c\u304b\u306a\u3048", "votes_\u5ca1\u4e0b\u3057\u3087\u3046\u3078\u3044": "\u5ca1\u4e0b\u3057\u3087\u3046\u3078\u3044", "votes_\u5ca9\u8c37\u826f\u5e73": "\u5ca9\u8c37\u826f\u5e73", "votes_\u5cf6\u7530\u3068\u3082\u3042\u304d": "\u5cf6\u7530\u3068\u3082\u3042\u304d", "votes_\u5de6\u85e4\u7ae0": "\u5de6\u85e4\u7ae0", "votes_\u5e73\u5ca9\u307e\u3055\u304d": "\u5e73\u5ca9\u307e\u3055\u304d", "votes_\u5e73\u5ddd\u305b\u3064\u3088": "\u5e73\u5ddd\u305b\u3064\u3088", "votes_\u6708\u8db3\u307e\u3044\u3053": "\u6708\u8db3\u307e\u3044\u3053", "votes_\u6771\u3068\u304a\u308b": "\u6771\u3068\u304a\u308b", "votes_\u6771\u7530\u3058\u3085\u3093\u307a\u3044": "\u6771\u7530\u3058\u3085\u3093\u307a\u3044", "votes_\u677e\u5ca1\u80fd\u793c": "\u677e\u5ca1\u80fd\u793c", "votes_\u6885\u6751\u3055\u3068\u3057": "\u6885\u6751\u3055\u3068\u3057", "votes_\u68ee\u5c71\u3072\u308d\u3086\u304d": "\u68ee\u5c71\u3072\u308d\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u6c60\u4e0a\u308f\u304b\u3053": "\u6c60\u4e0a\u308f\u304b\u3053", "votes_\u6c60\u4e0b\u5353": "\u6c60\u4e0b\u5353", "votes_\u6ca2\u7530\u304f\u307f\u3053": "\u6ca2\u7530\u304f\u307f\u3053", "votes_\u6e05\u6c34\u305f\u3060\u3057": "\u6e05\u6c34\u305f\u3060\u3057", "votes_\u7247\u5ca1\u771f": "\u7247\u5ca1\u771f", "votes_\u77f3\u6a4b\u3042\u3064\u3057": "\u77f3\u6a4b\u3042\u3064\u3057", "votes_\u78ef\u90e8\u548c\u54c9": "\u78ef\u90e8\u548c\u54c9", "votes_\u798f\u7559\u30e8\u30fc\u30b3": "\u798f\u7559\u30e8\u30fc\u30b3", "votes_\u7af9\u5185\u3088\u3057\u306e\u308a": "\u7af9\u5185\u3088\u3057\u306e\u308a", "votes_\u85e4\u7530\u307f\u304d": "\u85e4\u7530\u307f\u304d", "votes_\u85e4\u7530\u6587\u6b66": "\u85e4\u7530\u6587\u6b66", "votes_\u897f\u7530\u85ab": "\u897f\u7530\u85ab", "votes_\u8c37\u5ddd\u3068\u3080": "\u8c37\u5ddd\u3068\u3080", "votes_\u8c37\u6d69\u4e00\u90ce": "\u8c37\u6d69\u4e00\u90ce", "votes_\u9060\u85e4\u305f\u304b\u3057": "\u9060\u85e4\u305f\u304b\u3057", "votes_\u99ac\u5834\u3072\u3067\u304d": "\u99ac\u5834\u3072\u3067\u304d", "votes_\u99ac\u5834\u4f38\u5e78": "\u99ac\u5834\u4f38\u5e78", "votes_\u9ed2\u5ddd\u3088\u3046\u3058": "\u9ed2\u5ddd\u3088\u3046\u3058", "votes_\u9ed2\u7530\u307e\u3055\u304d": "\u9ed2\u7530\u307e\u3055\u304d"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 72, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:10:02.297777", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 72, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 72}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "63767aed295d482b929ae7f149e4fdbd", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u6c96\u7e04\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u6c96\u7e04\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3042\u304b\u307f\u306d\u653f\u8ce2": "\u3042\u304b\u307f\u306d\u653f\u8ce2", "votes_\u30b3\u30af\u30d0\u5e78\u4e4b\u52a9": "\u30b3\u30af\u30d0\u5e78\u4e4b\u52a9", "votes_\u30cb\u30b7\u30e1\u6052\u4e09\u90ce": "\u30cb\u30b7\u30e1\u6052\u4e09\u90ce", "votes_\u30d2\u30ac\u30bf\u30ab\u30b7": "\u30d2\u30ac\u30bf\u30ab\u30b7", "votes_\u30df\u30e4\u30b6\u30ad\u653f\u4e45": "\u30df\u30e4\u30b6\u30ad\u653f\u4e45", "votes_\u30e4\u30e9\u3068\u3082\u3072\u308d": "\u30e4\u30e9\u3068\u3082\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u4e0b\u5730\u30df\u30ad\u30aa": "\u4e0b\u5730\u30df\u30ad\u30aa", "votes_\u4eca\u91ce\u3042\u3055\u307f": "\u4eca\u91ce\u3042\u3055\u307f", "votes_\u548c\u7530\u3068\u3082\u3072\u3055": "\u548c\u7530\u3068\u3082\u3072\u3055", "votes_\u5c71\u5ddd\u3072\u3068\u3057": "\u5c71\u5ddd\u3072\u3068\u3057", "votes_\u5c71\u5ddd\u3084\u3059\u3072\u308d": "\u5c71\u5ddd\u3084\u3059\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u5cf6\u5c3b\u3042\u3044\u5b50": "\u5cf6\u5c3b\u3042\u3044\u5b50", "votes_\u57a3\u30af\u30cb\u30aa": "\u57a3\u30af\u30cb\u30aa", "votes_\u57ce\u3064\u304b\u3055": "\u57ce\u3064\u304b\u3055", "votes_\u8d64\u5dba\u30ce\u30dc\u30eb": "\u8d64\u5dba\u30ce\u30dc\u30eb", "votes_\u91d1\u57ce\u30c8\u30aa\u30eb": "\u91d1\u57ce\u30c8\u30aa\u30eb"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 41, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:09:57.894539", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 41, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 41}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "3d1f302f92d0497ca56729c30355386a", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u5ca1\u5c71\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u5ca1\u5c71\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3042\u3044\u3055\u308f\u4e00\u90ce": "\u3042\u3044\u3055\u308f\u4e00\u90ce", "votes_\u3059\u307f\u3088\u308a\u8061\u7f8e": "\u3059\u307f\u3088\u308a\u8061\u7f8e", "votes_\u3064\u3080\u3089\u3051\u3044\u3059\u3051": "\u3064\u3080\u3089\u3051\u3044\u3059\u3051", "votes_\u306f\u305f\u3068\u3082\u3053": "\u306f\u305f\u3068\u3082\u3053", "votes_\u306f\u3063\u3068\u308a\u5343\u79cb": "\u306f\u3063\u3068\u308a\u5343\u79cb", "votes_\u4f50\u3005\u6728\u3086\u3046\u3058": "\u4f50\u3005\u6728\u3086\u3046\u3058", "votes_\u4f59\u6c5f\u3086\u304d\u304a": "\u4f59\u6c5f\u3086\u304d\u304a", "votes_\u52a0\u85e4\u52dd\u4fe1": "\u52a0\u85e4\u52dd\u4fe1", "votes_\u539f\u7530\u3042\u304d\u5b50": "\u539f\u7530\u3042\u304d\u5b50", "votes_\u539f\u7530\u30b1\u30f3\u30b9\u30b1": "\u539f\u7530\u30b1\u30f3\u30b9\u30b1", "votes_\u57a3\u5185\u96c4\u4e00": "\u57a3\u5185\u96c4\u4e00", "votes_\u5c71\u4e0b\u305f\u304b\u3057": "\u5c71\u4e0b\u305f\u304b\u3057", "votes_\u67da\u6728\u307f\u3061\u3088\u3057": "\u67da\u6728\u307f\u3061\u3088\u3057", "votes_\u6a4b\u672c\u304c\u304f": "\u6a4b\u672c\u304c\u304f"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 30, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:09:54.749551", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 30, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 30}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "eebeb4f251974ed98597b612d3f9ae71", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u5927\u5206\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u5927\u5206\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3048\u3068\u3046\u535a\u662d": "\u3048\u3068\u3046\u535a\u662d", "votes_\u3048\u3068\u3046\u5f81\u58eb\u90ce": "\u3048\u3068\u3046\u5f81\u58eb\u90ce", "votes_\u5409\u5ddd\u306f\u3058\u3081": "\u5409\u5ddd\u306f\u3058\u3081", "votes_\u5409\u826f\u5dde\u53f8": "\u5409\u826f\u5dde\u53f8", "votes_\u5927\u585a\u307f\u3064\u3088\u3057": "\u5927\u585a\u307f\u3064\u3088\u3057", "votes_\u5c0f\u6797\u304b\u3084\u3053": "\u5c0f\u6797\u304b\u3084\u3053", "votes_\u5c71\u4e0b\u304b\u3044": "\u5c71\u4e0b\u304b\u3044", "votes_\u5ca9\u5c4b\u305f\u3051\u3057": "\u5ca9\u5c4b\u305f\u3051\u3057", "votes_\u5e83\u702c\u5efa": "\u5e83\u702c\u5efa", "votes_\u91ce\u4e2d\u3057\u3093\u3059\u3051": "\u91ce\u4e2d\u3057\u3093\u3059\u3051"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:09:50.990881", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 19, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 19}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fcbf8423be5d4469befb195ea1821e7d", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u65b0\u6f5f\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u65b0\u6f5f\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3046\u3081\u305f\u306b\u5b88": "\u3046\u3081\u305f\u306b\u5b88", "votes_\u3055\u3044\u3068\u3046\u6d0b\u660e": "\u3055\u3044\u3068\u3046\u6d0b\u660e", "votes_\u305f\u304b\u3068\u308a\u4fee\u4e00": "\u305f\u304b\u3068\u308a\u4fee\u4e00", "votes_\u3064\u304b\u3060\u4e00\u90ce": "\u3064\u304b\u3060\u4e00\u90ce", "votes_\u307b\u305d\u3060\u5065\u4e00": "\u307b\u305d\u3060\u5065\u4e00", "votes_\u3088\u3057\u3080\u3089\u3086\u3046\u3044\u3061\u308d\u3046": "\u3088\u3057\u3080\u3089\u3086\u3046\u3044\u3061\u308d\u3046", "votes_\u308f\u3057\u304a\u82f1\u4e00\u90ce": "\u308f\u3057\u304a\u82f1\u4e00\u90ce", "votes_\u4e2d\u6751\u305f\u3051\u304a": "\u4e2d\u6751\u305f\u3051\u304a", "votes_\u4e95\u4e0a\u3082\u3068\u3086\u304d": "\u4e95\u4e0a\u3082\u3068\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u6cc9\u7530\u3072\u308d\u3072\u3053": "\u6cc9\u7530\u3072\u308d\u3072\u3053", "votes_\u77f3\ufa11\u3068\u304a\u308b": "\u77f3\ufa11\u3068\u304a\u308b", "votes_\u7c73\u5c71\u9686\u4e00": "\u7c73\u5c71\u9686\u4e00", "votes_\u83ca\u7530\u307e\u304d\u3053": "\u83ca\u7530\u307e\u304d\u3053", "votes_\u897f\u6751\u3061\u306a\u307f": "\u897f\u6751\u3061\u306a\u307f", "votes_\u9ed2\u5ca9\u305f\u304b\u3072\u308d": "\u9ed2\u5ca9\u305f\u304b\u3072\u308d"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 37, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:09:47.949425", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 37, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 37}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a5e46f85c73c4277a6e48e43ac041f0b", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u5948\u826f\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u5948\u826f\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u304a\u3056\u304d\u5145\u5178": "\u304a\u3056\u304d\u5145\u5178", "votes_\u304b\u308f\u3068\u3084\u3059\u3057": "\u304b\u308f\u3068\u3084\u3059\u3057", "votes_\u305f\u306e\u305b\u592a\u9053": "\u305f\u306e\u305b\u592a\u9053", "votes_\u307e\u3076\u3061\u3059\u307f\u304a": "\u307e\u3076\u3061\u3059\u307f\u304a", "votes_\u4e95\u4e0a\u826f\u5b50": "\u4e95\u4e0a\u826f\u5b50", "votes_\u539f\u5c71\u3060\u3044\u3059\u3051": "\u539f\u5c71\u3060\u3044\u3059\u3051", "votes_\u592a\u7530\u3042\u3064\u3057": "\u592a\u7530\u3042\u3064\u3057", "votes_\u5c0f\u6797\u3057\u3052\u304d": "\u5c0f\u6797\u3057\u3052\u304d", "votes_\u670d\u90e8\u3061\u304b": "\u670d\u90e8\u3061\u304b", "votes_\u6797\u5143\u653f\u5b50": "\u6797\u5143\u653f\u5b50", "votes_\u6c60\u7530\u3048\u3044\u5b50": "\u6c60\u7530\u3048\u3044\u5b50", "votes_\u9ad8\u5e02\u65e9\u82d7": "\u9ad8\u5e02\u65e9\u82d7", "votes_\u9ad8\u91ce\u3042\u3064\u3057": "\u9ad8\u91ce\u3042\u3064\u3057"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:09:44.922933", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 40, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 40}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "b7ea6b37bd8d4621a39a1442362398f1", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u9577\u5d0e\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u9577\u5d0e\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3059\u3048\u3064\u3050\u7cbe\u4e00": "\u3059\u3048\u3064\u3050\u7cbe\u4e00", "votes_\u4e0b\u6761\u535a\u6587": "\u4e0b\u6761\u535a\u6587", "votes_\u4e95\u4e0a\u7fd4\u4e00\u6717": "\u4e95\u4e0a\u7fd4\u4e00\u6717", "votes_\u5185\u7530\u9686\u82f1": "\u5185\u7530\u9686\u82f1", "votes_\u52a0\u85e4\u7adc\u7965": "\u52a0\u85e4\u7adc\u7965", "votes_\u5c71\u7530\u3072\u308d\u3057": "\u5c71\u7530\u3072\u308d\u3057", "votes_\u5c71\u7530\u52dd\u5f66": "\u5c71\u7530\u52dd\u5f66", "votes_\u6a2a\u7530\u3068\u3082\u3072\u308d": "\u6a2a\u7530\u3068\u3082\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u897f\u5ca1\u79c0\u5b50": "\u897f\u5ca1\u79c0\u5b50", "votes_\u91d1\u5b50\u5bb9\u4e09": "\u91d1\u5b50\u5bb9\u4e09", "votes_\u9ad9\u6728\u3055\u3068\u3053": "\u9ad9\u6728\u3055\u3068\u3053", "votes_\u9ed2\u77f3\u9686\u592a": "\u9ed2\u77f3\u9686\u592a"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:09:41.087247", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 21, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 21}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c68e896ba2164ba29298a46c998f2ec1", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u9577\u91ce\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u9577\u91ce\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3057\u306e\u306f\u3089\u5b5d": "\u3057\u306e\u306f\u3089\u5b5d", "votes_\u305f\u3051\u3060\u826f\u4ecb": "\u305f\u3051\u3060\u826f\u4ecb", "votes_\u3080\u305f\u3044\u4fca\u4ecb": "\u3080\u305f\u3044\u4fca\u4ecb", "votes_\u308f\u304b\u3055\u6e05\u53f2": "\u308f\u304b\u3055\u6e05\u53f2", "votes_\u4e0b\u6761\u307f\u3064": "\u4e0b\u6761\u307f\u3064", "votes_\u4e95\u51fa\u3088\u3046\u305b\u3044": "\u4e95\u51fa\u3088\u3046\u305b\u3044", "votes_\u5bae\u4e0b\u4e00\u90ce": "\u5bae\u4e0b\u4e00\u90ce", "votes_\u5f8c\u85e4\u3057\u3052\u3086\u304d": "\u5f8c\u85e4\u3057\u3052\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u5f8c\u85e4\u305d\u3046\u3044\u3061": "\u5f8c\u85e4\u305d\u3046\u3044\u3061", "votes_\u624b\u585a\u5927\u8f14": "\u624b\u585a\u5927\u8f14", "votes_\u795e\u6d25\u305f\u3051\u3057": "\u795e\u6d25\u305f\u3051\u3057", "votes_\u798f\u7530\u3058\u3085\u3093\u305f": "\u798f\u7530\u3058\u3085\u3093\u305f", "votes_\u82e5\u6797\u3051\u3093\u305f": "\u82e5\u6797\u3051\u3093\u305f"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 78, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:09:36.695982", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 78, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 78}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "e9f77e6b0af0473fb2052d1bb2062489", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u5bae\u5d0e\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u5bae\u5d0e\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3057\u3052\u3044\u3086\u304b": "\u3057\u3052\u3044\u3086\u304b", "votes_\u305f\u3051\u3044\u4fca\u8f14": "\u305f\u3051\u3044\u4fca\u8f14", "votes_\u3075\u308b\u304b\u308f\u3088\u3057\u3072\u3055": "\u3075\u308b\u304b\u308f\u3088\u3057\u3072\u3055", "votes_\u5916\u5c71\u3044\u3064\u304d": "\u5916\u5c71\u3044\u3064\u304d", "votes_\u6751\u306f\u3064\u3088": "\u6751\u306f\u3064\u3088", "votes_\u6c5f\u85e4\u62d3": "\u6c5f\u85e4\u62d3", "votes_\u6e21\u8fba\u5275": "\u6e21\u8fba\u5275", "votes_\u767d\u6c5f\u597d\u53cb": "\u767d\u6c5f\u597d\u53cb", "votes_\u9577\u53cb\u3057\u3093\u3058": "\u9577\u53cb\u3057\u3093\u3058"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 26, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:09:30.852927", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 26, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 26}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "91e9bda92cd3488ebb6ffec09b3ea02c", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u5bae\u57ce\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u5bae\u57ce\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3044\u3068\u3046\u4fe1\u592a\u90ce": "\u3044\u3068\u3046\u4fe1\u592a\u90ce", "votes_\u3055\u304b\u3044\u3064\u306d\u306f\u308b": "\u3055\u304b\u3044\u3064\u306d\u306f\u308b", "votes_\u3055\u3068\u3046\u3086\u3046\u3044\u3061": "\u3055\u3068\u3046\u3086\u3046\u3044\u3061", "votes_\u4e2d\u5d8b\u308c\u3093": "\u4e2d\u5d8b\u308c\u3093", "votes_\u571f\u4e95\u3068\u304a\u308b": "\u571f\u4e95\u3068\u304a\u308b", "votes_\u5927\u6797\u307e\u3055\u3072\u3067": "\u5927\u6797\u307e\u3055\u3072\u3067", "votes_\u5b89\u4f4f\u6df3": "\u5b89\u4f4f\u6df3", "votes_\u5c0f\u91ce\u5bfa\u4e94\u5178": "\u5c0f\u91ce\u5bfa\u4e94\u5178", "votes_\u5ca1\u672c\u3042\u304d\u5b50": "\u5ca1\u672c\u3042\u304d\u5b50", "votes_\u65e9\u5742\u3042\u3064\u3057": "\u65e9\u5742\u3042\u3064\u3057", "votes_\u67f3\u6ca2\u3064\u3088\u3057": "\u67f3\u6ca2\u3064\u3088\u3057", "votes_\u79cb\u8449\u3051\u3093\u3084": "\u79cb\u8449\u3051\u3093\u3084", "votes_\u897f\u6751\u3042\u304d\u3072\u308d": "\u897f\u6751\u3042\u304d\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u938c\u7530\u3055\u3086\u308a": "\u938c\u7530\u3055\u3086\u308a", "votes_\u9ad8\u6a4b\u3053\u3046\u3058": "\u9ad8\u6a4b\u3053\u3046\u3058"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 39, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:09:27.711260", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 39, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 39}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "103899ea223540d3af912794cb0e546c", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u4e09\u91cd\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u4e09\u91cd\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3057\u3082\u306e\u5e78\u52a9": "\u3057\u3082\u306e\u5e78\u52a9", "votes_\u3059\u305a\u304d\u82f1\u656c": "\u3059\u305a\u304d\u82f1\u656c", "votes_\u3075\u304f\u3082\u308a\u548c\u6b4c\u5b50": "\u3075\u304f\u3082\u308a\u548c\u6b4c\u5b50", "votes_\u4e2d\u5ddd\u305f\u307f\u3072\u3067": "\u4e2d\u5ddd\u305f\u307f\u3072\u3067", "votes_\u4f0a\u85e4\u307e\u3055\u3057": "\u4f0a\u85e4\u307e\u3055\u3057", "votes_\u51fa\u53e3\u6d0b\u4ecb": "\u51fa\u53e3\u6d0b\u4ecb", "votes_\u5c71\u672c\u308a\u304b": "\u5c71\u672c\u308a\u304b", "votes_\u5ca1\u7530\u304b\u3064\u3084": "\u5ca1\u7530\u304b\u3064\u3084", "votes_\u5ddd\u5d0e\u3072\u3067\u3068": "\u5ddd\u5d0e\u3072\u3067\u3068", "votes_\u68ee\u53e3\u3042\u3086\u307f": "\u68ee\u53e3\u3042\u3086\u307f", "votes_\u7530\u6751\u306e\u308a\u3072\u3055": "\u7530\u6751\u306e\u308a\u3072\u3055", "votes_\u77f3\u539f\u307e\u3055\u305f\u304b": "\u77f3\u539f\u307e\u3055\u305f\u304b", "votes_\u9752\u6cbc\u967d\u4e00\u90ce": "\u9752\u6cbc\u967d\u4e00\u90ce"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 30, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:09:23.929404", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 30, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 30}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d7213c47a17b45ef9a355d5c6a57dafc", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u4eac\u90fd\u5e9c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u4eac\u90fd\u5e9c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3042\u3060\u3061\u3086\u3046\u3058": "\u3042\u3060\u3061\u3086\u3046\u3058", "votes_\u3042\u3093\u3069\u3046\u88d5": "\u3042\u3093\u3069\u3046\u88d5", "votes_\u304b\u307f\u3058\u3087\u3046\u4eae\u4e00": "\u304b\u307f\u3058\u3087\u3046\u4eae\u4e00", "votes_\u3053\u307e\u3064\u5e83\u660e": "\u3053\u307e\u3064\u5e83\u660e", "votes_\u3055\u306e\u82f1\u5fd7": "\u3055\u306e\u82f1\u5fd7", "votes_\u305d\u306e\u3055\u304d\u5f18\u9053": "\u305d\u306e\u3055\u304d\u5f18\u9053", "votes_\u306a\u304b\u3058\u307e\u79c0\u6a39": "\u306a\u304b\u3058\u307e\u79c0\u6a39", "votes_\u3072\u3089\u305f\u3051\u8015\u4e09": "\u3072\u3089\u305f\u3051\u8015\u4e09", "votes_\u307e\u3048\u306f\u3089\u8aa0\u53f8": "\u307e\u3048\u306f\u3089\u8aa0\u53f8", "votes_\u3084\u307e\u306e\u3044\u548c\u5247": "\u3084\u307e\u306e\u3044\u548c\u5247", "votes_\u3088\u3057\u3060\u771f\u7531\u7f8e": "\u3088\u3057\u3060\u771f\u7531\u7f8e", "votes_\u4e95\u5742\u535a\u6587": "\u4e95\u5742\u535a\u6587", "votes_\u52dd\u76ee\u3084\u3059\u3057": "\u52dd\u76ee\u3084\u3059\u3057", "votes_\u5317\u795e\u3051\u3044\u308d\u3046": "\u5317\u795e\u3051\u3044\u308d\u3046", "votes_\u5409\u7530\u5e78\u4e00": "\u5409\u7530\u5e78\u4e00", "votes_\u5800\u5834\u3055\u3061\u5b50": "\u5800\u5834\u3055\u3061\u5b50", "votes_\u5800\u5ddd\u3042\u304d\u3053": "\u5800\u5ddd\u3042\u304d\u3053", "votes_\u5b89\u6301\u306a\u308b\u307f": "\u5b89\u6301\u306a\u308b\u307f", "votes_\u5c71\u4e0b\u3072\u308d\u5b50": "\u5c71\u4e0b\u3072\u308d\u5b50", "votes_\u5c71\u5185\u5065": "\u5c71\u5185\u5065", "votes_\u5c71\u672c\u308f\u304b\u3053": "\u5c71\u672c\u308f\u304b\u3053", "votes_\u5f18\u7530\u54f2\u96c4": "\u5f18\u7530\u54f2\u96c4", "votes_\u6728\u6751\u5143\u7d00": "\u6728\u6751\u5143\u7d00", "votes_\u672c\u7530\u3086\u3046\u3059\u3051": "\u672c\u7530\u3086\u3046\u3059\u3051", "votes_\u672c\u7530\u592a\u90ce": "\u672c\u7530\u592a\u90ce", "votes_\u68ee\u30ab\u30f3\u30bb\u30a4": "\u68ee\u30ab\u30f3\u30bb\u30a4", "votes_\u6cc9\u30b1\u30f3\u30bf": "\u6cc9\u30b1\u30f3\u30bf", "votes_\u7530\u4e2d\u3072\u3067\u3086\u304d": "\u7530\u4e2d\u3072\u3067\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u897f\u5c71\u306e\u3076\u3072\u3067": "\u897f\u5c71\u306e\u3076\u3072\u3067", "votes_\u9053\u672c\u305f\u304b\u3084": "\u9053\u672c\u305f\u304b\u3084"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 36, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:09:20.704232", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 36, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 36}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "103a674e29f04205a2fa127be51713fe", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u718a\u672c\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u718a\u672c\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u304a\u304f\u3060\u6728\u306e\u5b9f": "\u304a\u304f\u3060\u6728\u306e\u5b9f", "votes_\u3053\u3093\u3060\u3042\u304b\u306d": "\u3053\u3093\u3060\u3042\u304b\u306d", "votes_\u51fa\u53e3\u3057\u3093\u305f\u308d\u3046": "\u51fa\u53e3\u3057\u3093\u305f\u308d\u3046", "votes_\u5742\u672c\u3066\u3064\u3057": "\u5742\u672c\u3066\u3064\u3057", "votes_\u6728\u539f\u307f\u306e\u308b": "\u6728\u539f\u307f\u306e\u308b", "votes_\u690d\u7530\u305f\u304b\u3068\u3057": "\u690d\u7530\u305f\u304b\u3068\u3057", "votes_\u6a4b\u6751\u308a\u304b": "\u6a4b\u6751\u308a\u304b", "votes_\u77e2\u4e0a\u96c5\u7fa9": "\u77e2\u4e0a\u96c5\u7fa9", "votes_\u7b39\u672c\u3086\u304d\u3053": "\u7b39\u672c\u3086\u304d\u3053", "votes_\u897f\u91ce\u3060\u3044\u3059\u3051": "\u897f\u91ce\u3060\u3044\u3059\u3051", "votes_\u91cd\u677e\u305f\u304b\u307f": "\u91cd\u677e\u305f\u304b\u307f", "votes_\u91d1\u5b50\u3084\u3059\u3057": "\u91d1\u5b50\u3084\u3059\u3057"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 49, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:09:17.073467", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 49, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 49}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "bffc5ad815ff46379c9e1fd3501b70da", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u9ad8\u77e5\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u9ad8\u77e5\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u304a\u3056\u304d\u6b63\u76f4": "\u304a\u3056\u304d\u6b63\u76f4", "votes_\u4e2d\u8c37\u5143": "\u4e2d\u8c37\u5143", "votes_\u6b66\u5185\u306e\u308a\u304a": "\u6b66\u5185\u306e\u308a\u304a", "votes_\u6d5c\u5ddd\u3086\u308a\u3053": "\u6d5c\u5ddd\u3086\u308a\u3053"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 35, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:09:13.410200", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 35, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 35}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f7b51d2c6b2743b3969c8388bb6f72a4", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u795e\u5948\u5ddd\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u795e\u5948\u5ddd\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3042\u304a\u3084\u304e\u967d\u4e00\u90ce": "\u3042\u304a\u3084\u304e\u967d\u4e00\u90ce", "votes_\u3042\u304b\u307e\u4e8c\u90ce": "\u3042\u304b\u307e\u4e8c\u90ce", "votes_\u3042\u3079\u3068\u3082\u3053": "\u3042\u3079\u3068\u3082\u3053", "votes_\u3044\u3055\u3058\u3088\u3057\u3048": "\u3044\u3055\u3058\u3088\u3057\u3048", "votes_\u3044\u3068\u3046\u307e\u307f\u3053": "\u3044\u3068\u3046\u307e\u307f\u3053", "votes_\u3046\u3064\u307f\u3055\u3068\u308b": "\u3046\u3064\u307f\u3055\u3068\u308b", "votes_\u304f\u3055\u307e\u525b": "\u304f\u3055\u307e\u525b", "votes_\u3054\u3068\u3046\u7950\u4e00": "\u3054\u3068\u3046\u7950\u4e00", "votes_\u3055\u304b\u3044\u5b66": "\u3055\u304b\u3044\u5b66", "votes_\u3057\u304a\u3055\u304b\u6e90\u4e00\u90ce": "\u3057\u304a\u3055\u304b\u6e90\u4e00\u90ce", "votes_\u3057\u306e\u306f\u3089\u8c6a": "\u3057\u306e\u306f\u3089\u8c6a", "votes_\u3059\u304c\u7fa9\u5049": "\u3059\u304c\u7fa9\u5049", "votes_\u305d\u3046\u306e\u5275": "\u305d\u3046\u306e\u5275", "votes_\u305d\u3048\u3060\u52dd": "\u305d\u3048\u3060\u52dd", "votes_\u305f\u3081\u305d\u3046\u7a14": "\u305f\u3081\u305d\u3046\u7a14", "votes_\u306f\u3058\u304b\u306e\u3072\u308d\u304d": "\u306f\u3058\u304b\u306e\u3072\u308d\u304d", "votes_\u307e\u308b\u305f\u3053\u3046\u4e00\u90ce": "\u307e\u308b\u305f\u3053\u3046\u4e00\u90ce", "votes_\u307f\u305f\u306b\u82f1\u5f18": "\u307f\u305f\u306b\u82f1\u5f18", "votes_\u3080\u306a\u304b\u305f\u5bcc\u6b21\u90ce": "\u3080\u306a\u304b\u305f\u5bcc\u6b21\u90ce", "votes_\u3084\u306a\u304e\u3084\u6771\u4e09\u697c": "\u3084\u306a\u304e\u3084\u6771\u4e09\u697c", "votes_\u3084\u307e\u304e\u308f\u5927\u5fd7\u90ce": "\u3084\u307e\u304e\u308f\u5927\u5fd7\u90ce", "votes_\u3088\u3057\u3044\u3048\u5f18\u4ecb": "\u3088\u3057\u3044\u3048\u5f18\u4ecb", "votes_\u4e09\u597d\u308a\u3087\u3046": "\u4e09\u597d\u308a\u3087\u3046", "votes_\u4e26\u6728\u307e\u308a\u5b50": "\u4e26\u6728\u307e\u308a\u5b50", "votes_\u4e2d\u5c71\u306e\u308a\u3072\u308d": "\u4e2d\u5c71\u306e\u308a\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u4e2d\u6751\u305f\u3051\u3068": "\u4e2d\u6751\u305f\u3051\u3068", "votes_\u4e2d\u6751\u572d": "\u4e2d\u6751\u572d", "votes_\u4e2d\u897f\u3051\u3093\u3058": "\u4e2d\u897f\u3051\u3093\u3058", "votes_\u4e2d\u8c37\u4e00\u99ac": "\u4e2d\u8c37\u4e00\u99ac", "votes_\u4e45\u5742\u304f\u306b\u3048": "\u4e45\u5742\u304f\u306b\u3048", "votes_\u4eac\u3068\u3057\u3072\u3067": "\u4eac\u3068\u3057\u3072\u3067", "votes_\u4f50\u3005\u6728\u304b\u3064\u307f": "\u4f50\u3005\u6728\u304b\u3064\u307f", "votes_\u4f50\u3005\u6728\u30ca\u30aa\u30df": "\u4f50\u3005\u6728\u30ca\u30aa\u30df", "votes_\u4f50\u85e4\u304b\u304a\u308a": "\u4f50\u85e4\u304b\u304a\u308a", "votes_\u4f50\u85e4\u305f\u304b\u3057": "\u4f50\u85e4\u305f\u304b\u3057", "votes_\u5148\u6c96\u4ec1\u5fd7": "\u5148\u6c96\u4ec1\u5fd7", "votes_\u5185\u7530\u3048\u307f\u3053": "\u5185\u7530\u3048\u307f\u3053", "votes_\u52a0\u85e4\u3061\u304b": "\u52a0\u85e4\u3061\u304b", "votes_\u52a0\u85e4\u306a\u3092\u5b50": "\u52a0\u85e4\u306a\u3092\u5b50", "votes_\u53e4\u5ddd\u306a\u304a\u304d": "\u53e4\u5ddd\u306a\u304a\u304d", "votes_\u5409\u6751\u52dd\u7537": "\u5409\u6751\u52dd\u7537", "votes_\u5409\u7530\u5927\u6210": "\u5409\u7530\u5927\u6210", "votes_\u541b\u5d8b\u3061\u304b\u5b50": "\u541b\u5d8b\u3061\u304b\u5b50", "votes_\u5927\u585a\u3055\u3086\u308a": "\u5927\u585a\u3055\u3086\u308a", "votes_\u5927\u91ce\u62d3\u592b": "\u5927\u91ce\u62d3\u592b", "votes_\u592a\u3072\u3067\u3057": "\u592a\u3072\u3067\u3057", "votes_\u5c0f\u6cc9\u9032\u6b21\u90ce": "\u5c0f\u6cc9\u9032\u6b21\u90ce", "votes_\u5c71\u5d0e\u8aa0": "\u5c71\u5d0e\u8aa0", "votes_\u5c71\u672c\u3068\u3082\u3072\u308d": "\u5c71\u672c\u3068\u3082\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u5c71\u672c\u307f\u305a\u3048": "\u5c71\u672c\u307f\u305a\u3048", "votes_\u5e73\u672c\u3053\u3046\u3058\u308d\u3046": "\u5e73\u672c\u3053\u3046\u3058\u308d\u3046", "votes_\u65e9\u5ddd\u3046\u305f\u5b50": "\u65e9\u5ddd\u3046\u305f\u5b50", "votes_\u65e9\u7a32\u7530\u3086\u304d": "\u65e9\u7a32\u7530\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u661f\u91ce\u3064\u3088\u3057": "\u661f\u91ce\u3064\u3088\u3057", "votes_\u6728\ud842\udfb7\u5c0f\u767e\u5408": "\u6728\ud842\udfb7\u5c0f\u767e\u5408", "votes_\u677e\u672c\u7d14": "\u677e\u672c\u7d14", "votes_\u690d\u6728\u307e\u308a\u3053": "\u690d\u6728\u307e\u308a\u3053", "votes_\u6a2a\u5c71\u305b\u3044\u3054": "\u6a2a\u5c71\u305b\u3044\u3054", "votes_\u6a2a\u7530\u5149\u5f18": "\u6a2a\u7530\u5149\u5f18", "votes_\u6a2a\u95a2\u304b\u3064\u3072\u308d": "\u6a2a\u95a2\u304b\u3064\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u6c34\u6238\u307e\u3055\u3057": "\u6c34\u6238\u307e\u3055\u3057", "votes_\u6c5f\u5ca1\u305f\u304b\u3072\u308d": "\u6c5f\u5ca1\u305f\u304b\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u6c5f\u7530\u3051\u3093\u3058": "\u6c5f\u7530\u3051\u3093\u3058", "votes_\u6cb3\u91ce\u592a\u90ce": "\u6cb3\u91ce\u592a\u90ce", "votes_\u6d25\u91ce\u3066\u308b\u3072\u3055": "\u6d25\u91ce\u3066\u308b\u3072\u3055", "votes_\u6d45\u5ddd\u7fa9\u6cbb": "\u6d45\u5ddd\u7fa9\u6cbb", "votes_\u6df1\u4f5c\u30d8\u30b9\u30b9": "\u6df1\u4f5c\u30d8\u30b9\u30b9", "votes_\u718a\u5742\u305f\u304b\u306e\u308a": "\u718a\u5742\u305f\u304b\u306e\u308a", "votes_\u7247\u67f3\u3059\u3059\u3080": "\u7247\u67f3\u3059\u3059\u3080", "votes_\u7267\u5cf6\u304b\u308c\u3093": "\u7267\u5cf6\u304b\u308c\u3093", "votes_\u7518\u5229\u660e": "\u7518\u5229\u660e", "votes_\u7530\u4e2d\u304b\u305a\u306e\u308a": "\u7530\u4e2d\u304b\u305a\u306e\u308a", "votes_\u77f3\u4e95\u5321": "\u77f3\u4e95\u5321", "votes_\u7b20\u3072\u308d\u3075\u307f": "\u7b20\u3072\u308d\u3075\u307f", "votes_\u84ee\u6c60\u3086\u304d\u304a": "\u84ee\u6c60\u3086\u304d\u304a", "votes_\u85e4\u7530\u3057\u3085\u3046\u3044\u3061": "\u85e4\u7530\u3057\u3085\u3046\u3044\u3061", "votes_\u897f\u5ca1\u3088\u3057\u305f\u304b": "\u897f\u5ca1\u3088\u3057\u305f\u304b", "votes_\u8d64\u77f3\u3072\u308d\u5b50": "\u8d64\u77f3\u3072\u308d\u5b50", "votes_\u91d1\u5b50\u6d0b\u4e00": "\u91d1\u5b50\u6d0b\u4e00", "votes_\u91d1\u6751\u308a\u3085\u3046\u306a": "\u91d1\u6751\u308a\u3085\u3046\u306a", "votes_\u9234\u6728\u3051\u3044\u3059\u3051": "\u9234\u6728\u3051\u3044\u3059\u3051", "votes_\u9234\u6728\u307f\u3064\u305f\u304b": "\u9234\u6728\u307f\u3064\u305f\u304b", "votes_\u9577\u53cb\u3088\u3057\u3072\u308d": "\u9577\u53cb\u3088\u3057\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u98ef\u7530\u3088\u3057\u304d": "\u98ef\u7530\u3088\u3057\u304d", "votes_\u9ad8\u5bae\u307f\u3061\u5b50": "\u9ad8\u5bae\u307f\u3061\u5b50"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 58, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:09:09.887975", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 58, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 58}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "4f0c0520be404467bec7684fae541b12", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u9e7f\u5150\u5cf6\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u9e7f\u5150\u5cf6\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3064\u3058\u5065\u592a\u90ce": "\u3064\u3058\u5065\u592a\u90ce", "votes_\u306e\u307c\u308a\u305f\u304f\u307e": "\u306e\u307c\u308a\u305f\u304f\u307e", "votes_\u307e\u3064\u3056\u304d\u771f\u7434": "\u307e\u3064\u3056\u304d\u771f\u7434", "votes_\u307f\u305f\u305e\u306e\u3055\u3068\u3057": "\u307f\u305f\u305e\u306e\u3055\u3068\u3057", "votes_\u307f\u3084\u3058\u62d3\u99ac": "\u307f\u3084\u3058\u62d3\u99ac", "votes_\u3084\u3059\u304a\u304b\u5b8f\u6b66": "\u3084\u3059\u304a\u304b\u5b8f\u6b66", "votes_\u5c0f\u91cc\u3084\u3059\u3072\u308d": "\u5c0f\u91cc\u3084\u3059\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u5c71\u5185\u307f\u3064\u306e\u308a": "\u5c71\u5185\u307f\u3064\u306e\u308a", "votes_\u5ddd\u5185\u3072\u308d\u3057": "\u5ddd\u5185\u3072\u308d\u3057", "votes_\u68ee\u5c71\u3072\u308d\u3057": "\u68ee\u5c71\u3072\u308d\u3057", "votes_\u77e2\u7af9\u3086\u304b\u308a": "\u77e2\u7af9\u3086\u304b\u308a", "votes_\u91ce\u9593\u305f\u3051\u3057": "\u91ce\u9593\u305f\u3051\u3057"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 44, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:09:05.966489", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 44, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 44}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "653e58e65a224c5db865c147de19bc7d", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u9999\u5ddd\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u9999\u5ddd\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3055\u3055\u3044\u5b5d\u5fd7": "\u3055\u3055\u3044\u5b5d\u5fd7", "votes_\u305b\u3068\u9686\u4e00": "\u305b\u3068\u9686\u4e00", "votes_\u305f\u306a\u3079\u5065\u4e00": "\u305f\u306a\u3079\u5065\u4e00", "votes_\u305f\u307e\u304d\u96c4\u4e00\u90ce": "\u305f\u307e\u304d\u96c4\u4e00\u90ce", "votes_\u5927\u5ca1\u3072\u308d\u307f": "\u5927\u5ca1\u3072\u308d\u307f", "votes_\u5927\u91ce\u656c\u592a\u90ce": "\u5927\u91ce\u656c\u592a\u90ce", "votes_\u5c0f\u5ddd\u3058\u3085\u3093\u3084": "\u5c0f\u5ddd\u3058\u3085\u3093\u3084", "votes_\u5c0f\u6797\u306a\u304a\u307f": "\u5c0f\u6797\u306a\u304a\u307f", "votes_\u5e73\u4e95\u5353\u4e5f": "\u5e73\u4e95\u5353\u4e5f", "votes_\u753a\u5ddd\u30b8\u30e5\u30f3\u30b3": "\u753a\u5ddd\u30b8\u30e5\u30f3\u30b3", "votes_\u77f3\u7530\u307e\u3086": "\u77f3\u7530\u307e\u3086", "votes_\u7d30\u5ddd\u4fee\u5e73": "\u7d30\u5ddd\u4fee\u5e73"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:09:02.458213", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 19, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 19}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "13ce5ec043fd4e238665cc3390cf1f2d", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u5ca9\u624b\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u5ca9\u624b\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3057\u306a\u305f\u3051\u3057": "\u3057\u306a\u305f\u3051\u3057", "votes_\u3059\u305a\u304d\u4fca\u4e00": "\u3059\u305a\u304d\u4fca\u4e00", "votes_\u4e2d\u6751\u3086\u304d\u3053": "\u4e2d\u6751\u3086\u304d\u3053", "votes_\u5409\u7530\u606d\u5b50": "\u5409\u7530\u606d\u5b50", "votes_\u5c0f\u6ca2\u4e00\u90ce": "\u5c0f\u6ca2\u4e00\u90ce", "votes_\u7c73\u5185\u3072\u308d\u307e\u3055": "\u7c73\u5185\u3072\u308d\u307e\u3055", "votes_\u85e4\u539f\u305f\u304b\u3057": "\u85e4\u539f\u305f\u304b\u3057"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 33, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:08:59.068080", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 33, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 33}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2c53fdbb951541f1a449c0f5a98d423c", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u77f3\u5ddd\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u77f3\u5ddd\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3042\u3089\u3044\u6df3\u5fd7": "\u3042\u3089\u3044\u6df3\u5fd7", "votes_\u304a\u3060\u3051\u304b\u3044": "\u304a\u3060\u3051\u304b\u3044", "votes_\u304a\u3084\u307e\u3060\u7d4c\u5b50": "\u304a\u3084\u307e\u3060\u7d4c\u5b50", "votes_\u3053\u3070\u3084\u3057\u8aa0": "\u3053\u3070\u3084\u3057\u8aa0", "votes_\u3053\u3093\u3069\u3046\u548c\u4e5f": "\u3053\u3093\u3069\u3046\u548c\u4e5f", "votes_\u306b\u3057\u3060\u662d\u4e8c": "\u306b\u3057\u3060\u662d\u4e8c", "votes_\u3075\u3058\u306f\u3089\u5fb3\u82f1": "\u3075\u3058\u306f\u3089\u5fb3\u82f1", "votes_\u4f50\u3005\u6728\u306f\u3058\u3081": "\u4f50\u3005\u6728\u306f\u3058\u3081", "votes_\u5357\u3057\u3087\u3046\u3058": "\u5357\u3057\u3087\u3046\u3058", "votes_\u5742\u672c\u3072\u308d\u3057": "\u5742\u672c\u3072\u308d\u3057", "votes_\u5c0f\u68ee\u305f\u304f\u304a": "\u5c0f\u68ee\u305f\u304f\u304a", "votes_\u6751\u7530\u3057\u3052\u308b": "\u6751\u7530\u3057\u3052\u308b"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:08:55.221998", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 19, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 19}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "185aac2470314c65b3254cae9c88f5ca", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u8328\u57ce\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u8328\u57ce\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3044\u307e\u3080\u3089\u654f\u662d": "\u3044\u307e\u3080\u3089\u654f\u662d", "votes_\u304b\u3058\u304a\u304b\u535a\u6a39": "\u304b\u3058\u304a\u304b\u535a\u6a39", "votes_\u306a\u304c\u304a\u304b\u6842\u5b50": "\u306a\u304c\u304a\u304b\u6842\u5b50", "votes_\u306c\u304b\u304c\u798f\u5fd7\u90ce": "\u306c\u304b\u304c\u798f\u5fd7\u90ce", "votes_\u306f\u306a\u3057\u5eb7\u5f18": "\u306f\u306a\u3057\u5eb7\u5f18", "votes_\u3080\u3068\u3046\u3072\u308d\u307f\u3064": "\u3080\u3068\u3046\u3072\u308d\u307f\u3064", "votes_\u3080\u3068\u3046\u3086\u3046\u5b50": "\u3080\u3068\u3046\u3086\u3046\u5b50", "votes_\u4e2d\u6751\u306f\u3084\u3068": "\u4e2d\u6751\u306f\u3084\u3068", "votes_\u52a0\u5ddd\u3086\u3046\u307f": "\u52a0\u5ddd\u3086\u3046\u307f", "votes_\u5343\u8449\u305f\u3064\u304a": "\u5343\u8449\u305f\u3064\u304a", "votes_\u5409\u7530\u3064\u3070\u3055": "\u5409\u7530\u3064\u3070\u3055", "votes_\u56fd\u5149\u3042\u3084\u306e": "\u56fd\u5149\u3042\u3084\u306e", "votes_\u5927\u5185\u304f\u307f\u5b50": "\u5927\u5185\u304f\u307f\u5b50", "votes_\u5927\u9ad8\u4f38\u4e00": "\u5927\u9ad8\u4f38\u4e00", "votes_\u5ddd\u4e95\u3072\u308d\u5b50": "\u5ddd\u4e95\u3072\u308d\u5b50", "votes_\u68b6\u5c71\u3072\u308d\u3057": "\u68b6\u5c71\u3072\u308d\u3057", "votes_\u6a4b\u53e3\u306a\u307b": "\u6a4b\u53e3\u306a\u307b", "votes_\u6d45\u91ce\u3055\u3068\u3057": "\u6d45\u91ce\u3055\u3068\u3057", "votes_\u7530\u6240\u3088\u3057\u306e\u308a": "\u7530\u6240\u3088\u3057\u306e\u308a", "votes_\u77f3\u5ddd\u3042\u304d\u307e\u3055": "\u77f3\u5ddd\u3042\u304d\u307e\u3055", "votes_\u798f\u5cf6\u306e\u3076\u3086\u304d": "\u798f\u5cf6\u306e\u3076\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u9593\u5bae\u307f\u3061\u5b50": "\u9593\u5bae\u307f\u3061\u5b50", "votes_\u9752\u5c71\u3084\u307e\u3068": "\u9752\u5c71\u3084\u307e\u3068", "votes_\u9ad8\u6a4b\u8aa0\u4e00\u90ce": "\u9ad8\u6a4b\u8aa0\u4e00\u90ce"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 44, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:08:50.920055", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 44, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 44}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a5a68d54a9a546359f9779232b5be25f", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u5175\u5eab\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u5175\u5eab\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3044\u3055\u304b\u4fe1\u5f66": "\u3044\u3055\u304b\u4fe1\u5f66", "votes_\u3044\u3061\u3080\u3089\u6d69\u4e00\u90ce": "\u3044\u3061\u3080\u3089\u6d69\u4e00\u90ce", "votes_\u3044\u3068\u3046\u307e\u3055\u3084": "\u3044\u3068\u3046\u307e\u3055\u3084", "votes_\u304a\u304d\u572d\u5b50": "\u304a\u304d\u572d\u5b50", "votes_\u304b\u3068\u3046\u3051\u3093\u3058": "\u304b\u3068\u3046\u3051\u3093\u3058", "votes_\u304d\u3058\u307e\u3072\u308d\u3064\u3050": "\u304d\u3058\u307e\u3072\u308d\u3064\u3050", "votes_\u3053\u3080\u3089\u6f64": "\u3053\u3080\u3089\u6f64", "votes_\u305b\u304a\u3048\u3044\u3058": "\u305b\u304a\u3048\u3044\u3058", "votes_\u305b\u304d\u3088\u3057\u3072\u308d": "\u305b\u304d\u3088\u3057\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u305f\u3051\u3046\u3061\u3086\u307f\u3053": "\u305f\u3051\u3046\u3061\u3086\u307f\u3053", "votes_\u305f\u3080\u3089\u306a\u304a\u3084": "\u305f\u3080\u3089\u306a\u304a\u3084", "votes_\u3068\u304b\u3044\u7d00\u4e09\u6717": "\u3068\u304b\u3044\u7d00\u4e09\u6717", "votes_\u3072\u3073\u3086\u3046\u3053": "\u3072\u3073\u3086\u3046\u3053", "votes_\u3075\u3058\u3044\u3072\u3055\u3086\u304d": "\u3075\u3058\u3044\u3072\u3055\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u3075\u3058\u3059\u3048\u3072\u308d\u307f": "\u3075\u3058\u3059\u3048\u3072\u308d\u307f", "votes_\u3075\u3058\u308f\u3089\u305b\u3044\u3084": "\u3075\u3058\u308f\u3089\u305b\u3044\u3084", "votes_\u3075\u306a\u304b\u308f\u6cbb\u90ce": "\u3075\u306a\u304b\u308f\u6cbb\u90ce", "votes_\u307b\u308a\u3044\u3051\u3093\u3058": "\u307b\u308a\u3044\u3051\u3093\u3058", "votes_\u3082\u308a\u3084\u307e\u6b63\u4ec1": "\u3082\u308a\u3084\u307e\u6b63\u4ec1", "votes_\u3084\u306f\u305f\u30aa\u30ab\u30f3": "\u3084\u306f\u305f\u30aa\u30ab\u30f3", "votes_\u3084\u307e\u3060\u8ce2\u53f8": "\u3084\u307e\u3060\u8ce2\u53f8", "votes_\u4e00\u8c37\u52c7\u4e00\u90ce": "\u4e00\u8c37\u52c7\u4e00\u90ce", "votes_\u4e09\u6728\u3051\u3048": "\u4e09\u6728\u3051\u3048", "votes_\u4e0a\u7530\u3055\u3061\u5b50": "\u4e0a\u7530\u3055\u3061\u5b50", "votes_\u4e2d\u91ce\u3072\u308d\u307e\u3055": "\u4e2d\u91ce\u3072\u308d\u307e\u3055", "votes_\u4eca\u6cc9\u307e\u304a": "\u4eca\u6cc9\u307e\u304a", "votes_\u4f4f\u5409\u3072\u308d\u304d": "\u4f4f\u5409\u3072\u308d\u304d", "votes_\u52a0\u53e4\u304d\u3044\u3061\u308d": "\u52a0\u53e4\u304d\u3044\u3061\u308d", "votes_\u5409\u7530\u304f\u307f\u3053": "\u5409\u7530\u304f\u307f\u3053", "votes_\u5409\u898b\u79cb\u5f66": "\u5409\u898b\u79cb\u5f66", "votes_\u5411\u5c71\u597d\u4e00": "\u5411\u5c71\u597d\u4e00", "votes_\u548c\u7530\u6709\u4e00\u6717": "\u548c\u7530\u6709\u4e00\u6717", "votes_\u5927\u4e32\u307e\u3055\u304d": "\u5927\u4e32\u307e\u3055\u304d", "votes_\u592a\u7530\u6e05\u5e78": "\u592a\u7530\u6e05\u5e78", "votes_\u5c71\u4e0b\u3055\u3068\u3057": "\u5c71\u4e0b\u3055\u3068\u3057", "votes_\u5c71\u53e3\u3064\u3088\u3057": "\u5c71\u53e3\u3064\u3088\u3057", "votes_\u5c71\u5ca1\u3055\u3068\u307f": "\u5c71\u5ca1\u3055\u3068\u307f", "votes_\u5c71\u7530\u654f\u826f": "\u5c71\u7530\u654f\u826f", "votes_\u5ca1\u7530\u3055\u3068\u308b": "\u5ca1\u7530\u3055\u3068\u308b", "votes_\u5fb3\u5b89\u6df3\u5b50": "\u5fb3\u5b89\u6df3\u5b50", "votes_\u6728\u539f\u304f\u306b\u3084": "\u6728\u539f\u304f\u306b\u3084", "votes_\u677e\u672c\u305f\u3051\u3042\u304d": "\u677e\u672c\u305f\u3051\u3042\u304d", "votes_\u6797\u30de\u30ea\u30a2\u3086\u304d": "\u6797\u30de\u30ea\u30a2\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u685c\u4e95\u30b7\u30e5\u30a6": "\u685c\u4e95\u30b7\u30e5\u30a6", "votes_\u6a4b\u672c\u3051\u3044\u3054": "\u6a4b\u672c\u3051\u3044\u3054", "votes_\u6c60\u7551\u3053\u3046\u305f\u308d\u3046": "\u6c60\u7551\u3053\u3046\u305f\u308d\u3046", "votes_\u6cb9\u8c37\u8056\u4e00\u90ce": "\u6cb9\u8c37\u8056\u4e00\u90ce", "votes_\u6d5c\u672c\u3086\u304d\u3072\u308d": "\u6d5c\u672c\u3086\u304d\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u82e6\u74dc\u304b\u305a\u3057\u3052": "\u82e6\u74dc\u304b\u305a\u3057\u3052", "votes_\u897f\u6751\u3084\u3059\u3068\u3057": "\u897f\u6751\u3084\u3059\u3068\u3057", "votes_\u8c37\u516c\u4e00": "\u8c37\u516c\u4e00", "votes_\u8d64\u6728\u6b63\u5e78": "\u8d64\u6728\u6b63\u5e78", "votes_\u8d64\u7fbd\u304b\u305a\u3088\u3057": "\u8d64\u7fbd\u304b\u305a\u3088\u3057", "votes_\u9060\u85e4\u826f\u592a": "\u9060\u85e4\u826f\u592a", "votes_\u963f\u90e8\u3051\u3044\u3057": "\u963f\u90e8\u3051\u3044\u3057", "votes_\u9ad8\u7530\u3088\u3057\u306e\u3076": "\u9ad8\u7530\u3088\u3057\u306e\u3076"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 52, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:08:47.839090", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 52, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 52}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "610cde98c3eb406fa6f6214d9d2f219b", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u5317\u6d77\u9053", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u5317\u6d77\u9053 prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3044\u306a\u3064\u4e45": "\u3044\u306a\u3064\u4e45", "votes_\u304a\u304a\u3055\u304b\u8aa0\u4e8c": "\u304a\u304a\u3055\u304b\u8aa0\u4e8c", "votes_\u304a\u304a\u3064\u304d\u304f\u308c\u306f": "\u304a\u304a\u3064\u304d\u304f\u308c\u306f", "votes_\u304a\u304e\u3046\u548c\u654f": "\u304a\u304e\u3046\u548c\u654f", "votes_\u304b\u3068\u3046\u8cb4\u5f18": "\u304b\u3068\u3046\u8cb4\u5f18", "votes_\u304b\u308f\u306f\u3089\u3060\u82f1\u4e16": "\u304b\u308f\u306f\u3089\u3060\u82f1\u4e16", "votes_\u3055\u3044\u3068\u3046\u4f73\u4ee3": "\u3055\u3044\u3068\u3046\u4f73\u4ee3", "votes_\u3057\u306e\u3060\u5948\u4fdd\u5b50": "\u3057\u306e\u3060\u5948\u4fdd\u5b50", "votes_\u305f\u3064\u306e\u5e83\u5fd7": "\u305f\u3064\u306e\u5e83\u5fd7", "votes_\u3068\u308a\u3053\u3057\u826f\u5b5d": "\u3068\u308a\u3053\u3057\u826f\u5b5d", "votes_\u306b\u3057\u304b\u308f\u5c06\u4eba": "\u306b\u3057\u304b\u308f\u5c06\u4eba", "votes_\u4e2d\u5ddd\u3086\u3046\u3053": "\u4e2d\u5ddd\u3086\u3046\u3053", "votes_\u4e2d\u6751\u3072\u308d\u3086\u304d": "\u4e2d\u6751\u3072\u308d\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u4f0a\u85e4\u308a\u3061\u5b50": "\u4f0a\u85e4\u308a\u3061\u5b50", "votes_\u4f50\u3005\u6728\u3042\u3051\u307f": "\u4f50\u3005\u6728\u3042\u3051\u307f", "votes_\u4f50\u85e4\u8015\u5e73": "\u4f50\u85e4\u8015\u5e73", "votes_\u5343\u8449\u306a\u304a\u3053": "\u5343\u8449\u306a\u304a\u3053", "votes_\u5411\u5c71\u3058\u3085\u3093": "\u5411\u5c71\u3058\u3085\u3093", "votes_\u548c\u7530\u3088\u3057\u3042\u304d": "\u548c\u7530\u3088\u3057\u3042\u304d", "votes_\u5897\u7530\u5065\u6cbb": "\u5897\u7530\u5065\u6cbb", "votes_\u5bae\u5185\u3057\u304a\u308a": "\u5bae\u5185\u3057\u304a\u308a", "votes_\u5c0f\u6797\u3055\u3068\u308b": "\u5c0f\u6797\u3055\u3068\u308b", "votes_\u5c71\u5ca1\u9054\u4e38": "\u5c71\u5ca1\u9054\u4e38", "votes_\u5c71\u5d0e\u6cc9": "\u5c71\u5d0e\u6cc9", "votes_\u672c\u9593\u304b\u3064\u307f": "\u672c\u9593\u304b\u3064\u307f", "votes_\u6771\u304f\u306b\u3088\u3057": "\u6771\u304f\u306b\u3088\u3057", "votes_\u677e\u4e0b\u3072\u3067\u304d": "\u677e\u4e0b\u3072\u3067\u304d", "votes_\u677e\u6728\u3051\u3093\u3053\u3046": "\u677e\u6728\u3051\u3093\u3053\u3046", "votes_\u6b66\u90e8\u3042\u3089\u305f": "\u6b66\u90e8\u3042\u3089\u305f", "votes_\u6c60\u7530\u307e\u304d": "\u6c60\u7530\u307e\u304d", "votes_\u7530\u4e2d\u3088\u3057\u3072\u3068": "\u7530\u4e2d\u3088\u3057\u3072\u3068", "votes_\u77f3\u5ddd\u304b\u304a\u308a": "\u77f3\u5ddd\u304b\u304a\u308a", "votes_\u795e\u8c37\u3072\u308d\u3057": "\u795e\u8c37\u3072\u308d\u3057", "votes_\u8352\u4e95\u3086\u305f\u304b": "\u8352\u4e95\u3086\u305f\u304b", "votes_\u9053\u4e0b\u5927\u6a39": "\u9053\u4e0b\u5927\u6a39", "votes_\u9234\u6728\u305f\u304b\u3053": "\u9234\u6728\u305f\u304b\u3053", "votes_\u9234\u6728\u308a\u3085\u3046\u3058": "\u9234\u6728\u308a\u3085\u3046\u3058", "votes_\u9ad8\u6728\u3072\u308d\u3072\u3055": "\u9ad8\u6728\u3072\u308d\u3072\u3055", "votes_\u9ad9\u6a4b\u3086\u3046\u3059\u3051": "\u9ad9\u6a4b\u3086\u3046\u3059\u3051"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 191, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:08:43.903489", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 191, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 191}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "a9175f86fe494cb49134ad0d8eee718b", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u5e83\u5cf6\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u5e83\u5cf6\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3042\u305a\u307e\u304b\u3064\u3084": "\u3042\u305a\u307e\u304b\u3064\u3084", "votes_\u3044\u306e\u306f\u3089\u771f\u5f13": "\u3044\u306e\u306f\u3089\u771f\u5f13", "votes_\u3046\u3076\u306f\u3089\u3068\u3057\u3075\u307f": "\u3046\u3076\u306f\u3089\u3068\u3057\u3075\u307f", "votes_\u304b\u306d\u3057\u308d\u653f\u5b5d": "\u304b\u306d\u3057\u308d\u653f\u5b5d", "votes_\u3053\u3058\u307e\u654f\u6587": "\u3053\u3058\u307e\u654f\u6587", "votes_\u3057\u3052\u3080\u3089\u5e78\u53f8": "\u3057\u3052\u3080\u3089\u5e78\u53f8", "votes_\u3066\u3089\u3060\u7a14": "\u3066\u3089\u3060\u7a14", "votes_\u4e2d\u539f\u3064\u3088\u3057": "\u4e2d\u539f\u3064\u3088\u3057", "votes_\u4e95\u4e0a\u3057\u3093\u3084": "\u4e95\u4e0a\u3057\u3093\u3084", "votes_\u4f50\u85e4\u3053\u3046\u3058": "\u4f50\u85e4\u3053\u3046\u3058", "votes_\u5c0f\u6797\u53f2\u660e": "\u5c0f\u6797\u53f2\u660e", "votes_\u5c71\u7530\u306f\u3058\u3081": "\u5c71\u7530\u306f\u3058\u3081", "votes_\u5ca1\u7530\u3072\u308d\u307f": "\u5ca1\u7530\u3072\u308d\u307f", "votes_\u5cb8\u7530\u6587\u96c4": "\u5cb8\u7530\u6587\u96c4", "votes_\u5e73\u53e3\u3072\u308d\u3057": "\u5e73\u53e3\u3072\u308d\u3057", "votes_\u5e73\u672c\u6d69\u4e00": "\u5e73\u672c\u6d69\u4e00", "votes_\u6589\u85e4\u3066\u3064\u304a": "\u6589\u85e4\u3066\u3064\u304a", "votes_\u7389\u7530\u306e\u308a\u305f\u304b": "\u7389\u7530\u306e\u308a\u305f\u304b", "votes_\u798f\u7530\u7384": "\u798f\u7530\u7384", "votes_\u7a7a\u672c\u305b\u3044\u304d": "\u7a7a\u672c\u305b\u3044\u304d", "votes_\u9ad8\u898b\u3042\u3064\u307f": "\u9ad8\u898b\u3042\u3064\u307f"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 30, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:08:40.299843", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 30, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 30}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "c84a7f0abb854e1489e8e0cd5609d7ff", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u7fa4\u99ac\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u7fa4\u99ac\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3044\u306e\u3068\u3057\u308d\u3046": "\u3044\u306e\u3068\u3057\u308d\u3046", "votes_\u304a\u3076\u3061\u512a\u5b50": "\u304a\u3076\u3061\u512a\u5b50", "votes_\u3055\u3055\u304c\u308f\u535a\u7fa9": "\u3055\u3055\u304c\u308f\u535a\u7fa9", "votes_\u305f\u306a\u306f\u3057\u305b\u3064\u5b50": "\u305f\u306a\u306f\u3057\u305b\u3064\u5b50", "votes_\u306f\u304e\u308f\u3089\u8c9e\u592b": "\u306f\u304e\u308f\u3089\u8c9e\u592b", "votes_\u4e2d\u5cf6\u3086\u307f\u3053": "\u4e2d\u5cf6\u3086\u307f\u3053", "votes_\u4e2d\u66fd\u6839\u3084\u3059\u305f\u304b": "\u4e2d\u66fd\u6839\u3084\u3059\u305f\u304b", "votes_\u4f0a\u85e4\u305f\u3064\u3084": "\u4f0a\u85e4\u305f\u3064\u3084", "votes_\u5c71\u7530\u3072\u308d\u304d": "\u5c71\u7530\u3072\u308d\u304d", "votes_\u767d\u4e95\u3051\u3044\u3053": "\u767d\u4e95\u3051\u3044\u3053", "votes_\u77f3\u95a2\u305f\u304b\u3057": "\u77f3\u95a2\u305f\u304b\u3057", "votes_\u798f\u7530\u9054\u592b": "\u798f\u7530\u9054\u592b", "votes_\u9577\u8c37\u5ddd\u304b\u3044\u3061": "\u9577\u8c37\u5ddd\u304b\u3044\u3061", "votes_\u9ad8\u6a4b\u305f\u3082\u3064": "\u9ad8\u6a4b\u305f\u3082\u3064"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 36, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:08:36.942492", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 36, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 36}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "ab51613c835f4e3a9db65b033862b7c5", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u5c90\u961c\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u5c90\u961c\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3055\u304b\u3050\u3061\u76f4\u4eba": "\u3055\u304b\u3050\u3061\u76f4\u4eba", "votes_\u305b\u3093\u3060\u3042\u304d\u3072\u308d": "\u305b\u3093\u3060\u3042\u304d\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u305f\u306a\u306f\u3057\u6cf0\u6587": "\u305f\u306a\u306f\u3057\u6cf0\u6587", "votes_\u307e\u306e\u3055\u3068\u3057": "\u307e\u306e\u3055\u3068\u3057", "votes_\u4e09\u5c3e\u572d\u53f8": "\u4e09\u5c3e\u572d\u53f8", "votes_\u4eca\u4e95\u307e\u3055\u3068": "\u4eca\u4e95\u307e\u3055\u3068", "votes_\u4f0a\u85e4\u3042\u3086\u307f": "\u4f0a\u85e4\u3042\u3086\u307f", "votes_\u53e4\u5c4b\u572d\u53f8": "\u53e4\u5c4b\u572d\u53f8", "votes_\u5c71\u7530\u826f\u53f8": "\u5c71\u7530\u826f\u53f8", "votes_\u5c71\u8d8a\u3068\u304a\u308b": "\u5c71\u8d8a\u3068\u304a\u308b", "votes_\u6b66\u85e4\u3088\u3046\u3058": "\u6b66\u85e4\u3088\u3046\u3058", "votes_\u91ce\u7530\u8056\u5b50": "\u91ce\u7530\u8056\u5b50", "votes_\u91d1\u5b50\u3057\u3085\u3093\u307a\u3044": "\u91d1\u5b50\u3057\u3085\u3093\u307a\u3044"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 42, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:08:33.775610", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 42, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 42}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9833aa47459f4ce7abd4c4acf88c4d5b", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u798f\u5cf6\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u798f\u5cf6\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u304a\u3050\u307e\u614e\u53f8": "\u304a\u3050\u307e\u614e\u53f8", "votes_\u304b\u306d\u3053\u6075\u7f8e": "\u304b\u306d\u3053\u6075\u7f8e", "votes_\u304f\u307e\u304c\u3044\u667a": "\u304f\u307e\u304c\u3044\u667a", "votes_\u3052\u3093\u3070\u5149\u4e00\u90ce": "\u3052\u3093\u3070\u5149\u4e00\u90ce", "votes_\u4e0a\u6749\u3051\u3093\u305f\u308d\u3046": "\u4e0a\u6749\u3051\u3093\u305f\u308d\u3046", "votes_\u4e38\u672c\u3086\u307f\u3053": "\u4e38\u672c\u3086\u307f\u3053", "votes_\u4e80\u5ca1\u3088\u3057\u305f\u307f": "\u4e80\u5ca1\u3088\u3057\u305f\u307f", "votes_\u5510\u6a4b\u306e\u308a\u304a": "\u5510\u6a4b\u306e\u308a\u304a", "votes_\u5742\u672c\u7adc\u592a\u90ce": "\u5742\u672c\u7adc\u592a\u90ce", "votes_\u658e\u85e4\u3086\u3046\u304d": "\u658e\u85e4\u3086\u3046\u304d", "votes_\u6839\u672c\u62d3": "\u6839\u672c\u62d3"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 59, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:08:30.574795", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 59, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 59}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "f589131d7434412ca0cb277cd4338466", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u798f\u5ca1\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u798f\u5ca1\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3042\u305d\u3046\u592a\u90ce": "\u3042\u305d\u3046\u592a\u90ce", "votes_\u3042\u3079\u3072\u308d\u304d": "\u3042\u3079\u3072\u308d\u304d", "votes_\u3044\u3061\u306e\u305b\u5c0f\u591c\u5b50": "\u3044\u3061\u306e\u305b\u5c0f\u591c\u5b50", "votes_\u3044\u306a\u3068\u307f\u4fee\u4e8c": "\u3044\u306a\u3068\u307f\u4fee\u4e8c", "votes_\u304a\u304c\u305f\u6797\u592a\u90ce": "\u304a\u304c\u305f\u6797\u592a\u90ce", "votes_\u304a\u306b\u304d\u8aa0": "\u304a\u306b\u304d\u8aa0", "votes_\u304b\u3081\u3060\u6643\u5c1a": "\u304b\u3081\u3060\u6643\u5c1a", "votes_\u304b\u308f\u306e\u7965\u5b50": "\u304b\u308f\u306e\u7965\u5b50", "votes_\u304d\u3044\u305f\u304b\u3057": "\u304d\u3044\u305f\u304b\u3057", "votes_\u304f\u308a\u306f\u3089\u6e09": "\u304f\u308a\u306f\u3089\u6e09", "votes_\u3053\u306e\u307f\u4eae\u592a\u90ce": "\u3053\u306e\u307f\u4eae\u592a\u90ce", "votes_\u3057\u304d\u73b2\u5b50": "\u3057\u304d\u73b2\u5b50", "votes_\u305d\u3046\u3042\u304d\u3053": "\u305d\u3046\u3042\u304d\u3053", "votes_\u305f\u3051\u3060\u826f\u592a": "\u305f\u3051\u3060\u826f\u592a", "votes_\u306b\u3048\u3060\u5143\u6c17": "\u306b\u3048\u3060\u5143\u6c17", "votes_\u306f\u3068\u3084\u307e\u4e8c\u90ce": "\u306f\u3068\u3084\u307e\u4e8c\u90ce", "votes_\u3075\u304f\u306a\u308a\u5065\u592a": "\u3075\u304f\u306a\u308a\u5065\u592a", "votes_\u3086\u304d\u3072\u3089\u4f73\u5f18": "\u3086\u304d\u3072\u3089\u4f73\u5f18", "votes_\u308f\u305f\u306c\u304d\u82f1\u5f66": "\u308f\u305f\u306c\u304d\u82f1\u5f66", "votes_\u30bf\u30b3\u30b9\u30ad\u30c3\u30c9": "\u30bf\u30b3\u30b9\u30ad\u30c3\u30c9", "votes_\u4e09\u539f\u3042\u3055\u3068": "\u4e09\u539f\u3042\u3055\u3068", "votes_\u4e38\u5c3e\u3051\u3044\u3059\u3051": "\u4e38\u5c3e\u3051\u3044\u3059\u3051", "votes_\u4e95\u4e0a\u305f\u304b\u3072\u308d": "\u4e95\u4e0a\u305f\u304b\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u53e4\u5ddd\u3084\u3059\u3057": "\u53e4\u5ddd\u3084\u3059\u3057", "votes_\u53e4\u8cc0\u3042\u3064\u3057": "\u53e4\u8cc0\u3042\u3064\u3057", "votes_\u5409\u6751\u306f\u308b\u304b": "\u5409\u6751\u306f\u308b\u304b", "votes_\u5409\u677e\u3082\u3068\u3042\u304d": "\u5409\u677e\u3082\u3068\u3042\u304d", "votes_\u5824\u304b\u306a\u3081": "\u5824\u304b\u306a\u3081", "votes_\u5927\u77f3\u3058\u3093\u3068": "\u5927\u77f3\u3058\u3093\u3068", "votes_\u5965\u7530\u3075\u307f\u3088": "\u5965\u7530\u3075\u307f\u3088", "votes_\u5bae\u5185\u3072\u3067\u304d": "\u5bae\u5185\u3072\u3067\u304d", "votes_\u5c71\u53e3\u3086\u3046\u3068": "\u5c71\u53e3\u3086\u3046\u3068", "votes_\u5c71\u672c\u3054\u3046\u305b\u3044": "\u5c71\u672c\u3054\u3046\u305b\u3044", "votes_\u5c71\u672c\u306a\u304a\u307f": "\u5c71\u672c\u306a\u304a\u307f", "votes_\u5c71\u7530\u3072\u308d\u3068\u3057": "\u5c71\u7530\u3072\u308d\u3068\u3057", "votes_\u5ca1\u90e8\u5409\u9ad8": "\u5ca1\u90e8\u5409\u9ad8", "votes_\u5e73\u5cf6\u3057\u308d\u3046": "\u5e73\u5cf6\u3057\u308d\u3046", "votes_\u672c\u53f8\u3086\u304d\u3072\u308d": "\u672c\u53f8\u3086\u304d\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u6751\u4e0a\u3068\u3082\u306e\u3076": "\u6751\u4e0a\u3068\u3082\u306e\u3076", "votes_\u6751\u7530\u3057\u3085\u3093\u3044\u3061": "\u6751\u7530\u3057\u3085\u3093\u3044\u3061", "votes_\u677e\u5c3e\u3088\u3057\u307f\u3064": "\u677e\u5c3e\u3088\u3057\u307f\u3064", "votes_\u677e\u5c3e\u308a\u3064\u5b50": "\u677e\u5c3e\u308a\u3064\u5b50", "votes_\u68ee\u7530\u3068\u3057\u3075\u307f": "\u68ee\u7530\u3068\u3057\u3075\u307f", "votes_\u6c96\u5712\u30ea\u30a8": "\u6c96\u5712\u30ea\u30a8", "votes_\u6cb3\u91ce\u304b\u305a\u3072\u308d": "\u6cb3\u91ce\u304b\u305a\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u702c\u5c3e\u3072\u3067\u3068\u3057": "\u702c\u5c3e\u3072\u3067\u3068\u3057", "votes_\u798f\u672c\u305f\u304b\u3057": "\u798f\u672c\u305f\u304b\u3057", "votes_\u7dd2\u65b9\u304d\u3048": "\u7dd2\u65b9\u304d\u3048", "votes_\u85e4\u4e38\u3055\u3068\u3057": "\u85e4\u4e38\u3055\u3068\u3057", "votes_\u8fd1\u85e4\u307e\u3055\u3072\u3053": "\u8fd1\u85e4\u307e\u3055\u3072\u3053", "votes_\u91cd\u677e\u3086\u3046\u3053": "\u91cd\u677e\u3086\u3046\u3053", "votes_\u9ed2\u77f3\u3086\u3046\u3053": "\u9ed2\u77f3\u3086\u3046\u3053"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 75, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:08:27.529956", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 75, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 75}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "76baf749f82d4482a76211a4df124fbc", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u798f\u4e95\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u798f\u4e95\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u304a\u3084\u306a\u304e\u8302\u81e3": "\u304a\u3084\u306a\u304e\u8302\u81e3", "votes_\u304b\u306d\u3082\u3068\u5e78\u679d": "\u304b\u306d\u3082\u3068\u5e78\u679d", "votes_\u3064\u3058\u82f1\u4e4b": "\u3064\u3058\u82f1\u4e4b", "votes_\u306f\u305f\u306e\u3064\u3070\u3055": "\u306f\u305f\u306e\u3064\u3070\u3055", "votes_\u5c71\u672c\u62d3": "\u5c71\u672c\u62d3", "votes_\u6589\u6728\u6b66\u5fd7": "\u6589\u6728\u6b66\u5fd7", "votes_\u7530\u4e2d\u3053\u306f\u308b": "\u7530\u4e2d\u3053\u306f\u308b", "votes_\u7a32\u7530\u3068\u3082\u307f": "\u7a32\u7530\u3068\u3082\u307f", "votes_\u897f\u5c71\u7406\u6075": "\u897f\u5c71\u7406\u6075", "votes_\u9ad8\u6728\u3064\u3088\u3057": "\u9ad8\u6728\u3064\u3088\u3057"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:08:23.465084", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 17, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 17}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "d62b6bce6afa43299dbb80c76fc6e658", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u611b\u5a9b\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u611b\u5a9b\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3044\u3057\u3044\u3068\u3082\u3048": "\u3044\u3057\u3044\u3068\u3082\u3048", "votes_\u304b\u3058\u306e\u3053\u3046\u3059\u3051": "\u304b\u3058\u306e\u3053\u3046\u3059\u3051", "votes_\u3053\u3046\u305d\u304c\u3079\u3088\u3057\u307f\u3061": "\u3053\u3046\u305d\u304c\u3079\u3088\u3057\u307f\u3061", "votes_\u4e95\u539f\u305f\u304f\u307f": "\u4e95\u539f\u305f\u304f\u307f", "votes_\u5869\u5d0e\u3042\u304d\u3072\u3055": "\u5869\u5d0e\u3042\u304d\u3072\u3055", "votes_\u767d\u77f3\u6d0b\u4e00": "\u767d\u77f3\u6d0b\u4e00", "votes_\u77f3\u672c\u61b2\u4e00": "\u77f3\u672c\u61b2\u4e00", "votes_\u897f\u4e95\u76f4\u4eba": "\u897f\u4e95\u76f4\u4eba", "votes_\u8d8a\u667a\u304d\u3088\u3059\u307f": "\u8d8a\u667a\u304d\u3088\u3059\u307f", "votes_\u9577\u8c37\u5ddd\u3058\u3085\u3093\u3058": "\u9577\u8c37\u5ddd\u3058\u3085\u3093\u3058"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:08:20.334410", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 20, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 20}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "60643d2bf9434aac92f6ca14e4a5f064", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u5343\u8449\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u5343\u8449\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3044\u307e\u3069\u3081\u5c1a\u4eba": "\u3044\u307e\u3069\u3081\u5c1a\u4eba", "votes_\u3048\u308a\u30a2\u30eb\u30d5\u30a3\u30e4": "\u3048\u308a\u30a2\u30eb\u30d5\u30a3\u30e4", "votes_\u304a\u304f\u306e\u7dcf\u4e00\u90ce": "\u304a\u304f\u306e\u7dcf\u4e00\u90ce", "votes_\u304f\u305a\u306f\u3089\u8302": "\u304f\u305a\u306f\u3089\u8302", "votes_\u304f\u3069\u3046\u8056\u5b50": "\u304f\u3069\u3046\u8056\u5b50", "votes_\u3055\u3044\u3068\u3046\u5065": "\u3055\u3044\u3068\u3046\u5065", "votes_\u3057\u3044\u306a\u4eae\u592a": "\u3057\u3044\u306a\u4eae\u592a", "votes_\u305f\u304c\u3084\u4eae": "\u305f\u304c\u3084\u4eae", "votes_\u305f\u3058\u307e\u8981": "\u305f\u3058\u307e\u8981", "votes_\u305f\u307f\u3084\u3072\u3055\u3068": "\u305f\u307f\u3084\u3072\u3055\u3068", "votes_\u3068\u304f\u307e\u3059\u304d\u3088\u5b50": "\u3068\u304f\u307e\u3059\u304d\u3088\u5b50", "votes_\u306a\u304b\u3084\u3081\u3050": "\u306a\u304b\u3084\u3081\u3050", "votes_\u3072\u3060\u304b\u525b": "\u3072\u3060\u304b\u525b", "votes_\u307f\u3084\u304b\u308f\u4f38": "\u307f\u3084\u304b\u308f\u4f38", "votes_\u307f\u3084\u3058\u7d14\u4e00": "\u307f\u3084\u3058\u7d14\u4e00", "votes_\u3084\u304b\u307e\u30b1\u30f3\u30bf": "\u3084\u304b\u307e\u30b1\u30f3\u30bf", "votes_\u3088\u3060\u304b\u305a\u305f\u304b": "\u3088\u3060\u304b\u305a\u305f\u304b", "votes_\u30df\u30b5\u30aa\u30fb\u30ec\u30c3\u30c9\u30a6\u30eb\u30d5": "\u30df\u30b5\u30aa\u30fb\u30ec\u30c3\u30c9\u30a6\u30eb\u30d5", "votes_\u4e0a\u7530\u3042\u3064\u3072\u308d": "\u4e0a\u7530\u3042\u3064\u3072\u308d", "votes_\u4ef2\u3086\u304d\u3053": "\u4ef2\u3086\u304d\u3053", "votes_\u52a0\u85e4\u548c\u592b": "\u52a0\u85e4\u548c\u592b", "votes_\u539f\u7530\u3057\u3093\u305f\u308d\u3046": "\u539f\u7530\u3057\u3093\u305f\u308d\u3046", "votes_\u539f\u7530\u3088\u3057\u3084\u3059": "\u539f\u7530\u3088\u3057\u3084\u3059", "votes_\u5730\u5f15\u76f4\u8f1d": "\u5730\u5f15\u76f4\u8f1d", "votes_\u5742\u4e95\u3088\u3046\u3059\u3051": "\u5742\u4e95\u3088\u3046\u3059\u3051", "votes_\u5927\u3059\u304d\u3086\u3046\u3084": "\u5927\u3059\u304d\u3086\u3046\u3084", "votes_\u5b89\u85e4\u3058\u3085\u3093\u5b50": "\u5b89\u85e4\u3058\u3085\u3093\u5b50", "votes_\u5bae\u672c\u3072\u308d\u3086\u304d": "\u5bae\u672c\u3072\u308d\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u5c0f\u6797\u305f\u304b\u3086\u304d": "\u5c0f\u6797\u305f\u304b\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u5c0f\u6c60\u307e\u3055\u3042\u304d": "\u5c0f\u6c60\u307e\u3055\u3042\u304d", "votes_\u5c71\u5d0e\u306f\u308b\u3086\u304d": "\u5c71\u5d0e\u306f\u308b\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u5ca1\u5cf6\u304b\u305a\u307e\u3055": "\u5ca1\u5cf6\u304b\u305a\u307e\u3055", "votes_\u5ca1\u91ce\u7d14\u5b50": "\u5ca1\u91ce\u7d14\u5b50", "votes_\u5cb8\u91ce\u3068\u3082\u3084\u3059": "\u5cb8\u91ce\u3068\u3082\u3084\u3059", "votes_\u5e73\u6238\u822a\u592a": "\u5e73\u6238\u822a\u592a", "votes_\u6728\u6751\u3066\u3064\u3084": "\u6728\u6751\u3066\u3064\u3084", "votes_\u672c\u5e84\u3055\u3068\u3057": "\u672c\u5e84\u3055\u3068\u3057", "votes_\u677e\u672c\u3044\u305a\u307f": "\u677e\u672c\u3044\u305a\u307f", "votes_\u677e\u672c\u3072\u3055\u3057": "\u677e\u672c\u3072\u3055\u3057", "votes_\u677e\u91ce\u3072\u308d\u304b\u305a": "\u677e\u91ce\u3072\u308d\u304b\u305a", "votes_\u67cf\u5d0e\u3059\u3048\u3068": "\u67cf\u5d0e\u3059\u3048\u3068", "votes_\u685c\u4e95\u96c5\u4eba": "\u685c\u4e95\u96c5\u4eba", "votes_\u68ee\u82f1\u4ecb": "\u68ee\u82f1\u4ecb", "votes_\u690e\u540d\u53f2\u660e": "\u690e\u540d\u53f2\u660e", "votes_\u6c34\u6cbc\u3072\u3067\u3086\u304d": "\u6c34\u6cbc\u3072\u3067\u3086\u304d", "votes_\u6d5c\u7530\u3084\u3059\u304b\u305a": "\u6d5c\u7530\u3084\u3059\u304b\u305a", "votes_\u6d66\u91ce\u771f": "\u6d66\u91ce\u771f", "votes_\u6e21\u8fba\u3072\u308d\u307f\u3061": "\u6e21\u8fba\u3072\u308d\u307f\u3061", "votes_\u6e21\u90e8\u307e\u3055\u3057": "\u6e21\u90e8\u307e\u3055\u3057", "votes_\u7530\u6cbc\u305f\u304b\u3057": "\u7530\u6cbc\u305f\u304b\u3057", "votes_\u767d\u77f3\u3061\u3088": "\u767d\u77f3\u3061\u3088", "votes_\u77e2\u5d0e\u3051\u3093\u305f\u308d\u3046": "\u77e2\u5d0e\u3051\u3093\u305f\u308d\u3046", "votes_\u77f3\u585a\u3055\u3060\u307f\u3061": "\u77f3\u585a\u3055\u3060\u307f\u3061", "votes_\u85e4\u5dfb\u3051\u3093\u305f": "\u85e4\u5dfb\u3051\u3093\u305f", "votes_\u8c37\u7530\u5ddd\u306f\u3058\u3081": "\u8c37\u7530\u5ddd\u306f\u3058\u3081", "votes_\u91ce\u7530\u3088\u3057\u3072\u3053": "\u91ce\u7530\u3088\u3057\u3072\u3053", "votes_\u9580\u5c71\u3072\u308d\u3042\u304d": "\u9580\u5c71\u3072\u308d\u3042\u304d", "votes_\u96e8\u5bae\u304d\u3087\u3046\u3053": "\u96e8\u5bae\u304d\u3087\u3046\u3053", "votes_\u9ad8\u6a4b\u304d\u3087\u3046\u3059\u3051": "\u9ad8\u6a4b\u304d\u3087\u3046\u3059\u3051", "votes_\u9ad8\u6a4b\u3055\u3068\u3057": "\u9ad8\u6a4b\u3055\u3068\u3057"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 61, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:08:17.277420", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 61, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 61}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "dbdb0f5cebb24400afadbf7c69dbc3df", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u9752\u68ee\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u9752\u68ee\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u304b\u306d\u306f\u307e\u3042\u304d\u3089": "\u304b\u306d\u306f\u307e\u3042\u304d\u3089", "votes_\u3055\u3044\u3068\u3046\u307f\u304a": "\u3055\u3044\u3068\u3046\u307f\u304a", "votes_\u305d\u306e\u305f\u5bff\u4e00": "\u305d\u306e\u305f\u5bff\u4e00", "votes_\u3064\u3057\u307e\u6df3": "\u3064\u3057\u307e\u6df3", "votes_\u307e\u3059\u305f\u4e16\u559c\u7537": "\u307e\u3059\u305f\u4e16\u559c\u7537", "votes_\u4e45\u4fdd\u3057\u3087\u3046": "\u4e45\u4fdd\u3057\u3087\u3046", "votes_\u5ca1\u7530\u306f\u306a\u3053": "\u5ca1\u7530\u306f\u306a\u3053", "votes_\u6728\u6751\u6b21\u90ce": "\u6728\u6751\u6b21\u90ce", "votes_\u677e\u5c3e\u548c\u5f66": "\u677e\u5c3e\u548c\u5f66", "votes_\u795e\u7530\u6f64\u4e00": "\u795e\u7530\u6f64\u4e00", "votes_\u9577\u5742\u3058\u3085\u3093\u3084": "\u9577\u5742\u3058\u3085\u3093\u3084"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:08:13.424635", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 40, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 40}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "9db8225e8e89476797905c2aa913f574", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u79cb\u7530\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u79cb\u7530\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3068\u304c\u3057\u535a\u4e4b": "\u3068\u304c\u3057\u535a\u4e4b", "votes_\u307f\u306e\u308a\u5ddd\u4fe1\u82f1": "\u307f\u306e\u308a\u5ddd\u4fe1\u82f1", "votes_\u5bfa\u7530\u5b66": "\u5bfa\u7530\u5b66", "votes_\u5c0f\u5ddd\u306e\u308a\u3088": "\u5c0f\u5ddd\u306e\u308a\u3088", "votes_\u5c71\u5185\u6885\u826f": "\u5c71\u5185\u6885\u826f", "votes_\u6751\u5ca1\u3068\u3057\u3072\u3067": "\u6751\u5ca1\u3068\u3057\u3072\u3067", "votes_\u677e\u6d66\u3060\u3044\u3054": "\u677e\u6d66\u3060\u3044\u3054", "votes_\u798f\u539f\u3058\u3085\u3093\u3058": "\u798f\u539f\u3058\u3085\u3093\u3058", "votes_\u7dd1\u5ddd\u305f\u304b\u3057": "\u7dd1\u5ddd\u305f\u304b\u3057", "votes_\u85e4\u7530\u304b\u305a\u3072\u3055": "\u85e4\u7530\u304b\u305a\u3072\u3055", "votes_\u9234\u6728\u3055\u3068\u3057": "\u9234\u6728\u3055\u3068\u3057"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 25, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:08:09.696039", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 25, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 25}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "eb76720a437640b38ed8789a3af98530", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662 SMD \u2014 \u611b\u77e5\u770c", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 House of Representatives SMD half, \u611b\u77e5\u770c prefecture, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 shugiin50 per-prefecture Excel. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u3042\u304a\u3084\u307e\u5468\u5e73": "\u3042\u304a\u3084\u307e\u5468\u5e73", "votes_\u3042\u3055\u304a\u5927\u8f14": "\u3042\u3055\u304a\u5927\u8f14", "votes_\u3044\u3068\u3046\u5fe0\u5f66": "\u3044\u3068\u3046\u5fe0\u5f66", "votes_\u3048\u304c\u307f\u535a\u4e4b": "\u3048\u304c\u307f\u535a\u4e4b", "votes_\u304a\u304a\u305f\u3051\u308a\u3048": "\u304a\u304a\u305f\u3051\u308a\u3048", "votes_\u304a\u304a\u306b\u3057\u5065\u4ecb": "\u304a\u304a\u306b\u3057\u5065\u4ecb", "votes_\u304f\u307e\u3060\u88d5\u901a": "\u304f\u307e\u3060\u88d5\u901a", "votes_\u3057\u3052\u3068\u304f\u548c\u5f66": "\u3057\u3052\u3068\u304f\u548c\u5f66", "votes_\u305b\u304d\u5065\u4e00\u90ce": "\u305b\u304d\u5065\u4e00\u90ce", "votes_\u3064\u3058\u6075": "\u3064\u3058\u6075", "votes_\u3070\u3093\u306e\u8c4a": "\u3070\u3093\u306e\u8c4a", "votes_\u3080\u308d\u305e\u306e\u5e78\u5fd7": "\u3080\u308d\u305e\u306e\u5e78\u5fd7", "votes_\u4e2d\u5ddd\u305f\u304b\u3082\u3068": "\u4e2d\u5ddd\u305f\u304b\u3082\u3068", "votes_\u4e2d\u5ddd\u3072\u308d\u3068": "\u4e2d\u5ddd\u3072\u308d\u3068", "votes_\u4e2d\u7530\u3061\u3088": "\u4e2d\u7530\u3061\u3088", "votes_\u4e39\u7fbd\u3072\u3067\u304d": "\u4e39\u7fbd\u3072\u3067\u304d", "votes_\u4e39\u91ce\u307f\u3069\u308a": "\u4e39\u91ce\u307f\u3069\u308a", "votes_\u4eca\u679d\u5b97\u4e00\u90ce": "\u4eca\u679d\u5b97\u4e00\u90ce", "votes_\u4f0a\u85e4\u6075\u5b50": "\u4f0a\u85e4\u6075\u5b50", "votes_\u516b\u6728\u3066\u3064\u3084": "\u516b\u6728\u3066\u3064\u3084", "votes_\u7530\u3086\u3046\u304d\u3061": "\u7530\u3086\u3046\u304d\u3061", "votes_\u539f\u7530\u5b66": "\u539f\u7530\u5b66", "votes_\u53e4\u5ddd\u3072\u308d\u3042\u304d": "\u53e4\u5ddd\u3072\u308d\u3042\u304d", "votes_\u53e4\u5ddd\u5143\u4e45": "\u53e4\u5ddd\u5143\u4e45", "votes_\u5409\u7530\u3064\u306d\u3072\u3053": "\u5409\u7530\u3064\u306d\u3072\u3053", "votes_\u5927\u6a4b\u3068\u304a\u308b": "\u5927\u6a4b\u3068\u304a\u308b", "votes_\u5927\u897f\u96c5\u4eba": "\u5927\u897f\u96c5\u4eba", "votes_\u5c0f\u5c71\u3061\u307b": "\u5c0f\u5c71\u3061\u307b", "votes_\u5c71\u672c\u3053\u3046\u3044\u3061": "\u5c71\u672c\u3053\u3046\u3044\u3061", "votes_\u5ca1\u672c\u307f\u3064\u306e\u308a": "\u5ca1\u672c\u307f\u3064\u306e\u308a", "votes_\u5cac\u307e\u304d": "\u5cac\u307e\u304d", "votes_\u5de5\u85e4\u5f70\u4e09": "\u5de5\u85e4\u5f70\u4e09", "votes_\u65e5\u91ce\u3055\u308a\u3042": "\u65e5\u91ce\u3055\u308a\u3042", "votes_\u6749\u672c\u3058\u3085\u3093\u3053": "\u6749\u672c\u3058\u3085\u3093\u3053", "votes_\u6749\u672c\u548c\u5df3": "\u6749\u672c\u548c\u5df3", "votes_\u677e\u5d0e\u7701\u4e09": "\u677e\u5d0e\u7701\u4e09", "votes_\u677e\u7530\u30a4\u30b5\u30aa": "\u677e\u7530\u30a4\u30b5\u30aa", "votes_\u6839\u672c\u5e78\u5178": "\u6839\u672c\u5e78\u5178", "votes_\u690d\u7530\u548c\u7537": "\u690d\u7530\u548c\u7537", "votes_\u6c34\u91ce\u3088\u3057\u3072\u3053": "\u6c34\u91ce\u3088\u3057\u3072\u3053", "votes_\u6cb3\u6751\u305f\u304b\u3057": "\u6cb3\u6751\u305f\u304b\u3057", "votes_\u725b\u7530\u6e05\u535a": "\u725b\u7530\u6e05\u535a", "votes_\u7267\u7fa9\u592b": "\u7267\u7fa9\u592b", "votes_\u72ac\u304b\u3044\u660e\u4f73": "\u72ac\u304b\u3044\u660e\u4f73", "votes_\u7530\u4e2d\u304b\u3064\u3088\u3057": "\u7530\u4e2d\u304b\u3064\u3088\u3057", "votes_\u7686\u5ddd\u307e\u3055\u304b\u305a": "\u7686\u5ddd\u307e\u3055\u304b\u305a", "votes_\u77f3\u4e95\u305f\u304f": "\u77f3\u4e95\u305f\u304f", "votes_\u795e\u7530\u3051\u3093\u3058": "\u795e\u7530\u3051\u3093\u3058", "votes_\u798f\u7530\u3068\u304a\u308b": "\u798f\u7530\u3068\u304a\u308b", "votes_\u82e5\u5c71\u3057\u3093\u3058": "\u82e5\u5c71\u3057\u3093\u3058", "votes_\u85e4\u539f\u306e\u308a\u307e\u3055": "\u85e4\u539f\u306e\u308a\u307e\u3055", "votes_\u897f\u5ddd\u3042\u3064\u3057": "\u897f\u5ddd\u3042\u3064\u3057", "votes_\u8fd1\u85e4\u662d\u4e00": "\u8fd1\u85e4\u662d\u4e00", "votes_\u9152\u4e95\u30b1\u30f3\u30bf\u30ed\u30fc": "\u9152\u4e95\u30b1\u30f3\u30bf\u30ed\u30fc", "votes_\u9234\u6728\u3053\u3046\u3044\u3061": "\u9234\u6728\u3053\u3046\u3044\u3061", "votes_\u9234\u6728\u3058\u3085\u3093\u3058": "\u9234\u6728\u3058\u3085\u3093\u3058", "votes_\u9577\u5742\u3084\u3059\u307e\u3055": "\u9577\u5742\u3084\u3059\u307e\u3055", "votes_\u95a2\u3072\u3055\u304b\u305a": "\u95a2\u3072\u3055\u304b\u305a", "votes_\u9ad8\u6a4b\u3086\u3046\u3059\u3051": "\u9ad8\u6a4b\u3086\u3046\u3059\u3051", "votes_\u9ad9\u6728\u3057\u3052\u308b": "\u9ad9\u6728\u3057\u3052\u308b", "votes_\u9ebb\u751f\u3061\u3055": "\u9ebb\u751f\u3061\u3055"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 69, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:08:05.600537", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 69, "n_distinct_geometry": 1, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 69}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "fa6b88dfde594ce3b3bb2415cb18e975", "name": "Japan 2024 \u8846\u8b70\u9662\u8b70\u54e1\u7dcf\u9078\u6319 (PR / Proportional Representation)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Japan 2024 lower-house proportional representation half, municipality-level vote totals. Source: \u7dcf\u52d9\u7701 (Soumusho) shugiin50 per-block Excel files. Votes are integer-rounded from \u6309\u5206\u7968 floats (proportional allocation of mixed-name ballots). registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised \u2014 Soumusho doesn't publish per-municipality registered at this level.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_\u307f\u3093\u306a\u3067\u3064\u304f\u308b\u515a": "\u307f\u3093\u306a\u3067\u3064\u304f\u308b\u515a", "votes_\u308c\u3044\u308f\u65b0\u9078\u7d44": "\u308c\u3044\u308f\u65b0\u9078\u7d44", "votes_\u516c\u660e\u515a": "\u516c\u660e\u515a", "votes_\u53c2\u653f\u515a": "\u53c2\u653f\u515a", "votes_\u56fd\u6c11\u6c11\u4e3b\u515a": "\u56fd\u6c11\u6c11\u4e3b\u515a", "votes_\u5b89\u697d\u6b7b\u5236\u5ea6\u3092\u8003\u3048\u308b\u4f1a": "\u5b89\u697d\u6b7b\u5236\u5ea6\u3092\u8003\u3048\u308b\u4f1a", "votes_\u65e5\u672c\u4fdd\u5b88\u515a": "\u65e5\u672c\u4fdd\u5b88\u515a", "votes_\u65e5\u672c\u5171\u7523\u515a": "\u65e5\u672c\u5171\u7523\u515a", "votes_\u65e5\u672c\u7dad\u65b0\u306e\u4f1a": "\u65e5\u672c\u7dad\u65b0\u306e\u4f1a", "votes_\u793e\u4f1a\u6c11\u4e3b\u515a": "\u793e\u4f1a\u6c11\u4e3b\u515a", "votes_\u7acb\u61b2\u6c11\u4e3b\u515a": "\u7acb\u61b2\u6c11\u4e3b\u515a", "votes_\u81ea\u7531\u6c11\u4e3b\u515a": "\u81ea\u7531\u6c11\u4e3b\u515a"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {"standard": "standard"}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1925, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-18T09:07:56.374772", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 1925, "n_distinct_geometry": 55, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 1925}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "02f1fbffd34b41b7a49843df99a5152e", "name": "United States 2020 Presidential (precinct-level, MEDSL+VEST)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2020, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "MIT MEDSL precinct-level votes joined to VEST 2020 polygon centroids via per-state recipes (vest-medsl-coords/improve_join.py). 122,994/153,388 precincts geocoded (80.2%). Candidates bucketed to Trump (R) / Biden (D) / Jorgensen (L) / Other; Green + minor parties fold into Other. registered=cast=valid=sum(votes) synthesised \u2014 MEDSL doesn't publish per-precinct denominators.", "electoral_system": "fptp", "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "unknown", "source_description": null, "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "station_id", "registered_col": "registered", "cast_col": "cast", "valid_col": "valid", "invalid_col": "invalid", "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": "lat", "lon_col": "lon", "candidate_cols": {"votes_trump": "Donald Trump (R)", "votes_biden": "Joseph R Biden (D) \u2014 winner", "votes_jorgensen": "Jo Jorgensen (L)", "votes_other": "Green + minor parties + write-ins"}, "long_format": false, "long_candidate_name_col": null, "long_candidate_votes_col": null, "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": "station_type", "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 149961, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-17T20:19:53.894677", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 119915, "n_distinct_geometry": 121249, "quality_index": 3.754, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 2.681, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.815, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.734, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.681, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.473, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.429, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.917, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.928, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.085, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.085, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.901, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 149961}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "58c9db3c98f34584bf148f76522ae660", "name": "Libya HNEC sample (Municipal)", "metadata": {"country": "Libya", "year": 2026, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "UNDP-supported HNEC tally; Individual + List races mixed", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "HNEC (Libya High National Elections Commission) operational database", "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "barcode", "registered_col": "number registrants", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "valid votes", "invalid_col": "invalid ballots", "region_col": "voting district", "sub_region_col": "center", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "candidate name", "long_candidate_votes_col": "votes", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 186, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"votes_gt_valid": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-04-29T19:42:51.880631", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.453, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 1.646, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.193, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.098, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.453, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.613, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.411, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.668, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.189, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.547, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.973, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.977, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.494, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.193, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.098, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.098, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.123, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.123, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.323, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.323, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.254, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.254, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.536, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.536, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 186}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": 0.2271505376344086, "fingerprint_category": "parallel_voluntary", "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "2915cfbbc9f1425d8a2adca246c0766b", "name": "South Africa 2024 (IEC)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": null, "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "IEC (Electoral Commission of South Africa) voting district results", "authority_tier": null, "publication_status": null}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "VD_Number", "registered_col": "Registered_Population", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "Total_Valid_Votes", "invalid_col": "Spoilt_Votes", "region_col": "Province", "sub_region_col": "Municipality", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "sPartyName", "long_candidate_votes_col": "Party_Votes", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 23292, "granularity": null, "quality_summary": {"cast_gt_registered": 67}, "n_stations_flagged": 67, "created_at": "2026-04-29T19:35:52.674174", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.695, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (2026) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index", "losers_consent_index": 3.351, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.734, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.648, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.695, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.351, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.046, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.391, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.648, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.517, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {"unknown": 23292}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": 0.2447294976384714, "fingerprint_category": "closed_list_pr_voluntary", "anomaly_pattern": "polarisation", "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1442", "name": "Mongolia 2021 \u2014 Presidential (per polling station, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Mongolia", "year": 2021, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2087, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 74, "turnout_100_pct": 23}, "n_stations_flagged": 23, "created_at": "2026-09-22T13:10:13.149769", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 1979, "n_distinct_geometry": 1588, "quality_index": 3.063, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.587, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.609, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.495, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.063, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.587, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.57, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.842, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.461, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.744, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.026, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.707, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.609, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.495, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.495, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.428, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.428, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.706, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1441", "name": "Sweden 2022 Riksdag (Valmyndigheten official)", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "98,194 rows = 6,578 valdistrikt \u00d7 parties; cast 6,547,801 / valid 6,477,970 / registered 7,775,390 reconcile to Valmyndigheten totals. Includes lat/lon centroids extracted from the EPSG:3006 polygon shapefile.\n", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6578, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 314}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-09-22T13:08:27.350370", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 314, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.864, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.895, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.892, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.613, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.195, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.813, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.813, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.976, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.009, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.009, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1440", "name": "Mexico 2024 Senadur\u00edas \u2014 per-acta recount/audit overlay (INE c\u00f3mputos)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 audited", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "audited"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 171794, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2356, "cast_exceeds_registered": 90, "turnout_100_pct": 125}, "n_stations_flagged": 215, "created_at": "2026-08-31T11:02:50.768833", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1439", "name": "Mexico 2024 Diputaciones Federales (INE c\u00f3mputos, per-acta status)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 171643, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2356, "cast_exceeds_registered": 66, "turnout_100_pct": 120}, "n_stations_flagged": 186, "created_at": "2026-08-31T10:54:23.876407", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1438", "name": "Mexico 2021 Diputaciones Federales (INE c\u00f3mputos, per-acta status)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 163666, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1746, "cast_exceeds_registered": 44, "turnout_100_pct": 203}, "n_stations_flagged": 247, "created_at": "2026-08-31T10:46:12.987473", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.525, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.624, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.534, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1437", "name": "Mexico 2018 Diputaciones Federales (INE c\u00f3mputos, per-acta status)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 157859, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2305, "cast_exceeds_registered": 55, "turnout_100_pct": 9}, "n_stations_flagged": 64, "created_at": "2026-08-31T10:38:09.387169", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.702, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.958, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.675, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.452, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.702, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.162, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.547, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.452, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.372, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.652, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "National Regeneration Movemenr (MORENA)", "winner_candidate": "Andr\u00e9s Manuel L\u00f3pez Obrador", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "National Action Party (PAN)", "margin": 30.91, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MEX", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1436", "name": "Mexico 2018 Presidencia (INE c\u00f3mputos, per-acta status)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2018, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 156840, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1253, "cast_exceeds_registered": 59, "turnout_100_pct": 12}, "n_stations_flagged": 71, "created_at": "2026-08-31T10:29:51.663162", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.702, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.958, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.675, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.452, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.702, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.162, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.547, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.452, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.372, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.652, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "National Regeneration Movemenr (MORENA)", "winner_candidate": "Andr\u00e9s Manuel L\u00f3pez Obrador", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "National Action Party (PAN)", "margin": 30.91, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MEX", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1435", "name": "Thailand 2026 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) [Proportional tier] (SAGE, per-constituency) \u2014 proportional_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Thailand", "year": 2026, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 400, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 400}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T09:21:43.322923", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 400, "n_distinct_geometry": 451, "quality_index": 3.266, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.424, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.314, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.16, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.576, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.441, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.36, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.785, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.632, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.424, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.314, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.314, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.247, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.247, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.478, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.478, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.635, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.587, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1434", "name": "Albania 2021 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Albania", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5199, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-08-31T09:21:18.873697", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 5199, "n_distinct_geometry": 1971, "quality_index": 2.451, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.905, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.526, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.438, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.451, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.613, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.905, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.627, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.407, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.68, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.144, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.536, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.526, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.526, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.615, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1433", "name": "Switzerland 2007 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2705, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2705}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T09:20:59.492316", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.849, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.888, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.842, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.435, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.157, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.039, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.888, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1432", "name": "Hungary 2014 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) [Individual Constituency tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 individual_constituency_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Hungary", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10386, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 3282, "cast_exceeds_registered": 75}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T09:12:42.082718", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 10384, "n_distinct_geometry": 7375, "quality_index": 2.954, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.734, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.669, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.521, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.734, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.074, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.767, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.668, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.319, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.521, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.505, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.442, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1431", "name": "Taiwan 2004 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Taiwan", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14643, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 7, "cast_exceeds_registered": 3, "turnout_100_pct": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-08-31T09:08:00.770180", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.359, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.408, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.776, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.677, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.359, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.408, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.793, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.388, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.118, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.198, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.672, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.318, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.919, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Democratic Progressive Party", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Kuomintang; Peoples First Party", "margin": 0.18, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "TWN", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1430", "name": "Hungary 2010 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) [Individual Constituency tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 individual_constituency_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Hungary", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10926, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T09:06:05.161876", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 10858, "n_distinct_geometry": 6660, "quality_index": 3.887, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.939, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.808, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.677, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.587, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.623, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.35, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.35, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Fidesz", "winner_candidate": "Pal Schmitt", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Hungarian Socialist Party", "margin": 52.8, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "HUN", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1429", "name": "Hungary 2014 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) [National List tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 national_list_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Hungary", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10386, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 10386}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T09:03:46.280453", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 10384, "n_distinct_geometry": 7375, "quality_index": 2.954, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.734, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.669, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.521, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.734, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.074, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.767, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.668, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.319, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.521, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.505, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.442, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1428", "name": "Hungary 2010 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) [National List tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 national_list_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Hungary", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10926, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T09:02:28.994682", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 10858, "n_distinct_geometry": 6660, "quality_index": 3.887, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.939, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.808, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.677, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.587, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.623, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.35, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.35, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Fidesz", "winner_candidate": "Pal Schmitt", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Hungarian Socialist Party", "margin": 52.8, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "HUN", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1427", "name": "Taiwan 2008 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) [Constituency tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 constituency_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Taiwan", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14377, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:55:26.398742", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.592, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.763, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.793, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.685, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.433, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.118, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.685, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.689, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Kuomintang", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Democratic Progressive Party", "margin": 16.9, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "TWN", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1426", "name": "Taiwan 2008 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) [Proportional tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 proportional_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Taiwan", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14377, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:53:39.774341", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.592, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.763, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.793, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.685, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.433, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.118, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.685, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.689, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Kuomintang", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Democratic Progressive Party", "margin": 16.9, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "TWN", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1425", "name": "Taiwan 2008 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Taiwan", "year": 2008, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14401, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:52:11.731730", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.592, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.763, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.793, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.685, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.433, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.118, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.685, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.689, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Kuomintang", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Democratic Progressive Party", "margin": 16.9, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "TWN", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1424", "name": "Taiwan 2004 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Taiwan", "year": 2004, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13786, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:50:07.066266", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.359, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.408, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.776, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.677, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.359, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.408, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.793, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.388, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.118, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.198, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.672, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.318, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.919, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Democratic Progressive Party", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Kuomintang; Peoples First Party", "margin": 0.18, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "TWN", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1423", "name": "Taiwan 2008 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) [Mountain Aboriginal tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 mountain_aboriginal_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Taiwan", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14377, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 5227, "turnout_100_pct": 1435}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:48:49.221823", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.592, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.763, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.793, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.685, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.433, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.118, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.685, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.689, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Kuomintang", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Democratic Progressive Party", "margin": 16.9, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "TWN", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1422", "name": "Taiwan 2008 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) [Lowland Aboriginal tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 lowland_aboriginal_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Taiwan", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14377, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 5033, "turnout_100_pct": 1224}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:46:35.926591", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.592, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.763, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.793, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.685, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.433, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.118, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.685, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.689, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Kuomintang", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Democratic Progressive Party", "margin": 16.9, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "TWN", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1421", "name": "Denmark 1987 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1987, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1967, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1967}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:43:14.637964", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 801, "n_distinct_geometry": 645, "quality_index": 3.738, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.873, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.879, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.254, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.064, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.002, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.002, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1420", "name": "Switzerland 1991 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 1991, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2860, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2860}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:42:52.079783", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.734, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.887, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.887, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.832, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.734, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.827, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.407, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.19, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.048, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.887, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.813, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.813, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1419", "name": "Switzerland 1995 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 1995, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2860, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2860}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:42:29.868339", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.727, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.887, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.835, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.727, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.544, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.19, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.048, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.887, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1418", "name": "Switzerland 1987 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 1987, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2901, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2901}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:41:57.635484", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.883, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.871, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.814, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.537, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.187, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.047, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.785, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1417", "name": "Switzerland 1999 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 1999, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2860, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2860}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:40:32.322073", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.725, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.89, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.89, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.838, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.725, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.842, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.394, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.18, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.045, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1416", "name": "Switzerland 2003 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2003, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2833, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2833}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:40:06.613868", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.733, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.88, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.888, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.841, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.733, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.182, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.045, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.888, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1415", "name": "Switzerland 1975 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 1975, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2902, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2902}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:39:30.521047", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.733, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.891, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.859, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.798, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.733, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1975, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1975, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.828, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 1975, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.532, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 1975, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 1975, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 1975, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.223, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.056, "year": 1975, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 1975, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.798, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 1975, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 1975, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.921, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 1975, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1975, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 1975, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1975, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1414", "name": "Switzerland 1983 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 1983, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2901, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2901}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:39:07.609565", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.738, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.88, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.871, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.813, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.188, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.047, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.813, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.813, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1413", "name": "Switzerland 1971 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 1971, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2914, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2914}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:38:45.641965", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.742, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.628, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.574, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.742, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.535, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.046, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.628, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 1971, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.574, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 1971, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 1971, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1412", "name": "Switzerland 1979 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 1979, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2889, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2889}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:37:04.057421", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.728, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.895, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.863, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.803, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.728, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.181, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.045, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 1979, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 1979, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.921, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1411", "name": "Denmark 1981 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1981, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1956, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1956}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:36:38.029110", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 787, "n_distinct_geometry": 630, "quality_index": 3.734, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.872, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.88, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.734, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.872, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.25, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.062, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.002, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.002, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1981, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1410", "name": "Denmark 1988 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1988, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1968, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1968}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:36:16.897103", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 804, "n_distinct_geometry": 645, "quality_index": 3.738, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.873, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.908, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.88, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.254, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.064, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.002, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.002, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1409", "name": "Denmark 1990 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1990, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1956, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1956}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:35:55.031015", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 813, "n_distinct_geometry": 654, "quality_index": 3.746, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.868, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.908, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.88, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.746, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.667, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.26, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.002, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.002, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1408", "name": "Denmark 1984 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1984, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1953, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1953}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:35:31.563801", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 795, "n_distinct_geometry": 645, "quality_index": 3.741, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.874, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.906, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.878, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.874, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.261, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.002, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.002, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1984, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1407", "name": "Denmark 1979 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1979, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1944, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1944}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:33:57.165748", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 783, "n_distinct_geometry": 623, "quality_index": 3.733, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.873, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.908, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.88, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.733, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.258, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.002, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.002, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1406", "name": "Denmark 1998 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1998, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1917, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1917}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:33:35.236073", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 815, "n_distinct_geometry": 636, "quality_index": 3.73, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.87, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.906, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.879, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.263, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.066, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.002, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.002, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1405", "name": "Denmark 2001 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 2001, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1898, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1898}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:32:56.216612", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 826, "n_distinct_geometry": 662, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.867, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.906, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.879, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.867, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.26, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.002, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.002, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1404", "name": "Denmark 2005 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1854, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1854}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:32:23.035406", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 836, "n_distinct_geometry": 662, "quality_index": 3.842, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.908, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.92, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.895, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.842, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.924, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.236, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.059, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.002, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.002, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1403", "name": "Denmark 1994 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 1994, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1915, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1915}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:32:01.767081", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 814, "n_distinct_geometry": 654, "quality_index": 3.732, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.875, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.909, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.881, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.732, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.869, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.656, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.25, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.062, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.002, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.002, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1402", "name": "Denmark 2007 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1644, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1644}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:31:39.688579", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 1159, "n_distinct_geometry": 995, "quality_index": 3.839, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.909, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.922, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.896, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.839, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.233, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.058, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.002, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.002, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1401", "name": "Thailand 2026 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) [Constituency tier] (SAGE, per-constituency) \u2014 constituency_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Thailand", "year": 2026, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 400, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 400}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-31T08:30:33.137245", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 400, "n_distinct_geometry": 451, "quality_index": 3.266, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.424, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.314, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.16, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.576, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.441, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.36, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.785, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.632, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.424, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.314, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.314, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.247, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.247, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.478, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.478, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.635, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.587, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1400", "name": "Brazil 2022 Governador (TSE bweb, se\u00e7\u00e3o level, both turnos)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 720050, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 17}, "n_stations_flagged": 17, "created_at": "2026-08-30T21:16:10.584547", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1399", "name": "Norway 2013 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (Storting, SAGE, per-station) \u2014 storting", "metadata": {"country": "Norway", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 655, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 655}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T23:23:35.882049", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 643, "n_distinct_geometry": 519, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.897, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.863, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.443, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.052, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.513, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.971, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.006, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.006, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.979, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1398", "name": "Kenya 2022 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Kenya", "year": 2022, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 46221, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 46221}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T23:19:07.483688", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 46036, "n_distinct_geometry": 18450, "quality_index": 2.613, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.409, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.55, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.45, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.613, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.409, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.806, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.634, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.006, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.487, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.55, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.45, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.45, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.876, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1397", "name": "France 2007 \u2014 Presidential R2 (SAGE, per-station) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2007, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 65611, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 39}, "n_stations_flagged": 39, "created_at": "2026-08-24T23:13:34.056955", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 64017, "n_distinct_geometry": 31958, "quality_index": 3.893, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.877, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.807, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.45, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.455, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.364, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.877, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.807, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.059, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.059, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "UMP", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "PS", "margin": 6.13, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "FRA", "year": 2007, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1396", "name": "France 2007 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 65614, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 23}, "n_stations_flagged": 23, "created_at": "2026-08-24T22:17:07.368024", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 64019, "n_distinct_geometry": 31958, "quality_index": 3.893, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.877, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.807, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.45, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.455, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.364, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.877, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.807, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.059, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.059, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "UMP", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "PS", "margin": 6.13, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "FRA", "year": 2007, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1395", "name": "France 2007 \u2014 Presidential R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2007, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 65613, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 64}, "n_stations_flagged": 64, "created_at": "2026-08-24T22:12:09.803328", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 64019, "n_distinct_geometry": 31958, "quality_index": 3.893, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.877, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.807, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.45, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.455, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.364, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.877, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.807, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.059, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.059, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "UMP", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "PS", "margin": 6.13, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "FRA", "year": 2007, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1394", "name": "Germany 1998 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) [Proportional tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 proportional_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 1998, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 89455, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 89455}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T22:03:55.221986", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 88664, "n_distinct_geometry": 12274, "quality_index": 3.94, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.831, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.894, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.856, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.965, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.767, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.561, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.64, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.894, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1393", "name": "Germany 2009 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) [Proportional tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 proportional_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 88413, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 88413}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T21:55:52.096153", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 87228, "n_distinct_geometry": 14764, "quality_index": 3.946, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.9, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.862, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.973, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.993, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.542, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1392", "name": "Germany 2013 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) [Constituency tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 constituency_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 87637, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 87637}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T21:46:52.668873", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 86963, "n_distinct_geometry": 12012, "quality_index": 3.885, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.947, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.892, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.853, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.947, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.938, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.622, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.407, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.982, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1391", "name": "Germany 2005 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) [Constituency tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 constituency_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 88473, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 88473}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T21:38:08.973801", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 87615, "n_distinct_geometry": 9704, "quality_index": 3.942, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.859, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.972, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.993, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.512, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1390", "name": "Germany 2002 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) [Constituency tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 constituency_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 89447, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 89447}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T21:29:55.635699", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 88442, "n_distinct_geometry": 11853, "quality_index": 3.939, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.831, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.898, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.859, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1389", "name": "South Korea 2020 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 37348, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 37348}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T21:25:42.915198", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 28638, "n_distinct_geometry": 12166, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.806, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.85, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.782, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.806, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.718, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.625, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.191, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.048, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.924, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.903, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.113, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.113, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1384", "name": "Greece 2019 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Greece", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21544, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 9, "turnout_100_pct": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 12, "created_at": "2026-08-24T21:05:58.430134", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 20385, "n_distinct_geometry": 7210, "quality_index": 3.93, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.954, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.864, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.763, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.693, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.023, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.739, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.924, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.173, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.173, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.905, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1383", "name": "Senegal 2024 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Senegal", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10932, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1122}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T21:01:37.783975", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 10884, "n_distinct_geometry": 1882, "quality_index": 3.487, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.605, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.605, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.461, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.487, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.605, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.424, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.153, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.966, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.51, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.378, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.461, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.461, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.443, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.674, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1382", "name": "Slovenia 2022 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Slovenia", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14172, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 11180}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T20:59:31.424199", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 3278, "n_distinct_geometry": 2226, "quality_index": 3.839, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.914, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.808, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.728, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.839, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.722, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.112, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.548, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.744, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.705, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.705, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.928, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.095, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.095, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1381", "name": "Sweden 2006 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5783, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 5783}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T20:57:53.122732", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 5783, "n_distinct_geometry": 6060, "quality_index": 3.891, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.923, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.912, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.879, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.923, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.223, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1378", "name": "Slovenia 2018 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Slovenia", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5314, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2305, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T20:53:18.068737", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 3107, "n_distinct_geometry": 1941, "quality_index": 3.65, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.783, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.83, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.759, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.002, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.151, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.738, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.894, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.09, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.09, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Social Democrats (SD) (formally Independent)", "winner_candidate": "Borut Pahor", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "List of Marjan \u0160arec (LMS)", "margin": 6.18, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "SVN", "year": 2017, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1377", "name": "Austria 2022 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Austria", "year": 2022, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2240, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2240}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T20:52:33.811423", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 2115, "n_distinct_geometry": 1914, "quality_index": 3.804, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.887, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.841, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.762, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.295, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.739, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.917, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.107, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.107, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1376", "name": "Palestine 2006 \u2014 Legislative (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Palestine", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2793, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2793}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T20:52:02.509449", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 2653, "n_distinct_geometry": 437, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1375", "name": "Cabo Verde 2021 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Cape Verde", "year": 2021, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1294, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T20:51:40.730500", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 1017, "n_distinct_geometry": 712, "quality_index": 3.775, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.936, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.775, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.676, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.775, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.635, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.271, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.678, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.482, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.676, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.601, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.601, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.912, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.259, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.259, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1374", "name": "Saint Lucia 2021 \u2014 Legislative (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Saint Lucia", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 110, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 110}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T20:51:19.127851", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 110, "n_distinct_geometry": 15, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1372", "name": "Cambodia 2013 \u2014 Legislative (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Cambodia", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1621, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1621}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T19:32:36.584155", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 1621, "n_distinct_geometry": 1828, "quality_index": 2.151, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.923, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.297, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.114, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.151, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.923, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.283, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.262, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.989, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.247, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.976, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.494, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.971, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.243, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.297, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.297, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.114, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.115, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.115, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.135, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.135, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.382, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.382, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1371", "name": "Switzerland 2011 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Switzerland", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2510, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2510}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T19:32:20.752688", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 2497, "n_distinct_geometry": 2568, "quality_index": 3.843, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.897, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.852, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1370", "name": "Peru 2011 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Peru", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 107455, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 107455}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T07:42:21.427253", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.88, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.959, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.812, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.67, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.066, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.516, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.501, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.501, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.816, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.916, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Gana Peru (GP)", "winner_candidate": "Ollanta Humala", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Fuerza 2011 (F2011)", "margin": 2.9, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PER", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1369", "name": "Peru 2011 \u2014 Andean Parliament (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Peru", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 107455, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 107455}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T07:34:38.067263", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.88, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.959, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.812, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.67, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.066, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.516, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.501, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.501, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.816, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.916, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Gana Peru (GP)", "winner_candidate": "Ollanta Humala", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Fuerza 2011 (F2011)", "margin": 2.9, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PER", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1368", "name": "Peru 2011 \u2014 Presidential R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Peru", "year": 2011, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 107455, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 107455}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T07:26:07.361327", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.88, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.959, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.812, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.67, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.066, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.516, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.501, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.501, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.816, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.916, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Gana Peru (GP)", "winner_candidate": "Ollanta Humala", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Fuerza 2011 (F2011)", "margin": 2.9, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PER", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1367", "name": "Poland 1991 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 1991, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 22338, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 22338}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T07:23:29.197328", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 22174, "n_distinct_geometry": 16040, "quality_index": 3.867, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.855, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.866, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.783, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.867, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.716, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.789, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.394, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.084, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.084, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Solidarity", "winner_candidate": "L. Walesa", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 48.6, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "POL", "year": 1990, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1365", "name": "Peru 2011 \u2014 Presidential R2 (SAGE, per-station) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Peru", "year": 2011, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 107449, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 107449}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T07:11:22.519890", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.88, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.959, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.812, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.67, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.066, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.516, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.501, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.501, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.816, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.916, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Gana Peru (GP)", "winner_candidate": "Ollanta Humala", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Fuerza 2011 (F2011)", "margin": 2.9, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PER", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1364", "name": "Poland 1993 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 1993, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 22482, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 22482}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T07:07:26.892346", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 22360, "n_distinct_geometry": 18807, "quality_index": 3.87, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.854, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.887, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.808, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.702, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.789, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.374, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.594, "year": 1993, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.887, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.084, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.084, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1363", "name": "South Korea 2012 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 27982, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 27982}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T07:03:52.214814", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 26854, "n_distinct_geometry": 13999, "quality_index": 3.279, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.753, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.658, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.279, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.178, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.288, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.181, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.045, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.753, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.753, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.658, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.648, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.823, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.196, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.196, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.823, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1362", "name": "Poland 2011 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 25984, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 25984}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T07:00:31.152500", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 25715, "n_distinct_geometry": 21528, "quality_index": 3.921, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.915, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.827, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.398, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.797, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.085, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.085, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.971, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Civic Platform", "winner_candidate": "B. Komorowski", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Law and Justice (PIS)", "margin": 6.02, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "POL", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1361", "name": "Poland 1995 \u2014 Presidential R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 1995, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 22748, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 22748}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T06:57:20.525001", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 22725, "n_distinct_geometry": 17961, "quality_index": 3.549, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.857, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.889, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.81, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.549, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.715, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.789, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.38, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.595, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.084, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.084, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic Left Alliance (SLD)", "winner_candidate": "A. Kwa\u015bniewski", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 3.4, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "POL", "year": 1995, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1360", "name": "Poland 2001 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 2001, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 24827, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 24827}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T06:54:01.573335", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 24662, "n_distinct_geometry": 15110, "quality_index": 3.865, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.856, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.806, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.9, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.695, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.084, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.084, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "A. Kwa\u015bniewski", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 36.6, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "POL", "year": 2000, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1359", "name": "South Korea 2008 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 26807, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 26807}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T06:50:37.111016", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 26196, "n_distinct_geometry": 11276, "quality_index": 3.919, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.942, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.759, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.661, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.749, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.288, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.206, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.654, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.894, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.17, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.17, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1358", "name": "Poland 1997 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 1997, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 23074, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 23074}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T06:47:37.399046", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 22925, "n_distinct_geometry": 17370, "quality_index": 3.867, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.857, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.871, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.792, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.867, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.905, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.702, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.084, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.084, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1357", "name": "Poland 2000 \u2014 Presidential R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 2000, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 24681, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 24681}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T06:40:30.772177", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 24514, "n_distinct_geometry": 11700, "quality_index": 3.865, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.856, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.878, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.8, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.9, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.695, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.084, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.084, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "A. Kwa\u015bniewski", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 36.6, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "POL", "year": 2000, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1356", "name": "Taiwan 2001 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) [Constituency tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 constituency_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Taiwan", "year": 2001, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13511, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T06:38:01.078852", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.594, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.904, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.782, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.682, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.594, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.539, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.118, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.389, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.682, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.68, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.318, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Democratic Progressive Party", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent - James Soong", "margin": 2.49, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "TWN", "year": 2000, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1355", "name": "Poland 1990 \u2014 Presidential R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 1990, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 22238, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 22238}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T06:34:56.614278", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 22228, "n_distinct_geometry": 14568, "quality_index": 3.867, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.855, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.74, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.66, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.867, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.532, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.716, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.643, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.483, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 1990, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.66, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.638, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.084, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.084, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Solidarity", "winner_candidate": "L. Walesa", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 48.6, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "POL", "year": 1990, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1354", "name": "Taiwan 1998 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) [Constituency tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 constituency_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Taiwan", "year": 1998, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13472, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T06:32:33.840592", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.446, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.87, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.659, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.493, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.734, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.061, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.598, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.458, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.659, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.493, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.493, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.547, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.547, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.38, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.38, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1353", "name": "Romania 2019 \u2014 Presidential R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Romania", "year": 2019, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19583, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 835, "cast_exceeds_registered": 126, "turnout_100_pct": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 130, "created_at": "2026-08-24T06:30:46.582351", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 18748, "n_distinct_geometry": 9740, "quality_index": 3.931, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.903, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.75, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.555, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.132, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.395, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.383, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.328, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.552, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.586, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.586, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.384, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.384, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1352", "name": "Poland 1995 \u2014 Presidential R2 (SAGE, per-station) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 1995, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 22472, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 22472}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T06:27:42.832476", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 22467, "n_distinct_geometry": 17544, "quality_index": 3.549, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.857, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.889, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.81, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.549, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.715, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.789, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.38, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.595, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.084, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.084, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic Left Alliance (SLD)", "winner_candidate": "A. Kwa\u015bniewski", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 3.4, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "POL", "year": 1995, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1351", "name": "Italy 2001 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2001, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8188, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8188}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T06:25:22.041467", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 7897, "n_distinct_geometry": 7699, "quality_index": 3.822, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.88, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.746, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.363, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.694, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.746, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.271, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.271, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1350", "name": "Taiwan 1995 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) [Constituency tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 constituency_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Taiwan", "year": 1995, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12201, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-08-24T06:23:42.930793", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.124, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.877, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.324, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.279, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.124, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.727, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.15, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.598, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.836, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 1995, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.324, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.324, "year": 1995, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.279, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.279, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.314, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.314, "year": 1995, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.818, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.38, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.38, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.654, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Kuomintang", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Democratic Progressive Party", "margin": 36.52, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "TWN", "year": 1996, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1349", "name": "Poland 1990 \u2014 Presidential R2 (SAGE, per-station) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 1990, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 22236, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 22236}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T06:21:04.240805", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 22226, "n_distinct_geometry": 14568, "quality_index": 3.867, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.855, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.74, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.66, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.867, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.532, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.716, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.643, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.483, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 1990, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.66, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.638, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 1990, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.084, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.084, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1990, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Solidarity", "winner_candidate": "L. Walesa", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 48.6, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "POL", "year": 1990, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1348", "name": "Brazil 2002 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6159, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6159}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T06:19:17.037726", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 5960, "n_distinct_geometry": 6180, "quality_index": 3.877, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.933, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.856, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.721, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.729, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.549, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.726, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.278, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.07, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Coalition Lula for President", "winner_candidate": "Luiz In\u00e1cio Lula da Silva", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Coalition Big Alliance", "margin": 22.54, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "BRA", "year": 2002, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1347", "name": "Romania 2016 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Romania", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19043, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 121}, "n_stations_flagged": 121, "created_at": "2026-08-24T06:17:12.645720", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.753, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.914, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.733, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.63, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.753, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.649, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.242, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.248, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.924, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.352, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.352, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1345", "name": "Bulgaria 2026 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Bulgaria", "year": 2026, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12721, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 16, "cast_exceeds_registered": 889, "turnout_100_pct": 88}, "n_stations_flagged": 977, "created_at": "2026-08-24T06:12:17.142529", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 11943, "n_distinct_geometry": 7032, "quality_index": 3.264, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.398, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.599, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.499, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.264, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.398, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.391, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.348, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.484, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.599, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.499, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.499, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.442, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.643, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.643, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.754, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1344", "name": "Italy 1996 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 1996, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8189, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8189}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T06:10:54.901296", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.823, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.884, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.835, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.75, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.823, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.884, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.208, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.694, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.764, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.935, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.245, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.245, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1343", "name": "Italy 2001 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) [Proportional tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 proportional_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2001, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8112, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8112}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T06:08:54.622799", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 7826, "n_distinct_geometry": 7699, "quality_index": 3.822, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.88, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.746, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.363, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.694, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.746, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.271, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.271, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1342", "name": "Romania 2019 \u2014 Presidential R2 (SAGE, per-station) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Romania", "year": 2019, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19583, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 835, "cast_exceeds_registered": 178, "turnout_100_pct": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 186, "created_at": "2026-08-24T06:06:40.839894", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 18748, "n_distinct_geometry": 9740, "quality_index": 3.931, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.903, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.75, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.555, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.132, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.395, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.383, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.328, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.552, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.586, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.586, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.384, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.384, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1341", "name": "South Korea 2007 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 2007, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13403, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 13403}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T06:05:26.390235", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 13176, "n_distinct_geometry": 11469, "quality_index": 3.919, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.942, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.834, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.759, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.749, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.68, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.206, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.735, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.132, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.132, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1340", "name": "Brazil 1998 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 1998, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6078, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6078}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T06:03:40.740450", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 5771, "n_distinct_geometry": 6130, "quality_index": 3.876, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.93, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.849, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.711, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.876, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.725, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.549, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.584, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.283, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.071, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.574, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.924, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Go ahead Brazil", "winner_candidate": "Fernando Henrique Cardoso", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Union of the People - Change Brazil", "margin": 21.35, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "BRA", "year": 1998, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1339", "name": "South Korea 2012 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 2012, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14044, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 14044}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T06:01:24.924704", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 13542, "n_distinct_geometry": 14652, "quality_index": 3.279, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.753, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.658, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.279, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.178, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.288, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.181, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.045, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.753, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.753, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.658, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.648, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.823, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.196, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.196, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.823, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1338", "name": "Italy 1994 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 1994, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8192, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8192}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T06:00:13.148880", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.538, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.883, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.83, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.743, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.205, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.694, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.761, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.69, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.743, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.935, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1337", "name": "Italy 2008 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) [Proportional tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 proportional_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8027, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8027}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:58:22.321264", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 7854, "n_distinct_geometry": 7941, "quality_index": 3.837, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.966, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.855, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.768, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.837, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.966, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.992, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.628, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.694, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.78, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1336", "name": "Paraguay 2018 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Paraguay", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21016, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 21016}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:55:21.496320", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 21016, "n_distinct_geometry": 543, "quality_index": 3.007, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.225, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.583, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.417, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.007, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.225, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.677, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.584, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.396, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.753, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.608, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.402, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.583, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.583, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.417, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.417, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.237, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.237, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.786, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.739, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "National Republican Association \u2013 Colorado Party (ANR)", "winner_candidate": "Mario Abdo Ben\u00edtez", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "GANAR Alliance", "margin": 3.88, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PRY", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1335", "name": "Dominican Republic 2012 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominican Republic", "year": 2012, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14644, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 174, "cast_exceeds_registered": 71, "turnout_100_pct": 11}, "n_stations_flagged": 82, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:53:14.311557", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 14005, "n_distinct_geometry": 1605, "quality_index": 3.215, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.842, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.612, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.366, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.215, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.842, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.516, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.583, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.396, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.448, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.007, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.564, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.391, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.366, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.366, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.328, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.452, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Partido de la Liberacion Dominicana (PLD)", "winner_candidate": "Danilo Medina", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Partido Revolucionario Dominicano (PRD)", "margin": 4.26, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "DOM", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1334", "name": "Bulgaria 2013 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Bulgaria", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11902, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 124, "turnout_100_pct": 68}, "n_stations_flagged": 192, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:51:28.204568", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.603, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.58, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.657, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.542, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.58, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.236, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.596, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.657, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.657, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.542, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.542, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.511, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.511, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.412, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.78, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1333", "name": "Dominican Republic 2016 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominican Republic", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15496, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 157, "cast_exceeds_registered": 9}, "n_stations_flagged": 9, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:50:34.537595", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.812, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.731, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.571, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.333, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.812, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.731, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.683, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.529, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.409, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.993, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.748, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.398, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.571, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.333, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.333, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.299, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.299, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.451, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.451, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Partido de la Liberacion Dominicana (PLD)", "winner_candidate": "Danilo Medina", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Partido Revolucionario Moderno (PRM)", "margin": 26.76, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "DOM", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1332", "name": "Brazil 1998 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 1998, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6092, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6092}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:44:54.827229", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 5785, "n_distinct_geometry": 6130, "quality_index": 3.876, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.93, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.849, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.711, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.876, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.725, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.549, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.584, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.283, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.071, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.574, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 1998, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 1998, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 1998, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.924, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 1998, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Go ahead Brazil", "winner_candidate": "Fernando Henrique Cardoso", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Union of the People - Change Brazil", "margin": 21.35, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "BRA", "year": 1998, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1331", "name": "Bulgaria 2014 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Bulgaria", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12177, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 428, "cast_exceeds_registered": 122, "turnout_100_pct": 35}, "n_stations_flagged": 157, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:44:11.369825", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.737, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.581, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.673, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.561, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.461, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.255, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.452, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.613, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.673, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.673, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.561, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.523, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.523, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.406, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.406, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.787, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1330", "name": "Italy 1992 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) [Proportional tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 proportional_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 1992, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8101, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8101}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:42:25.293709", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.822, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.881, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.831, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.747, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.196, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.146, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.532, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 1992, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.747, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.747, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.755, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1992, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1329", "name": "Brazil 2002 \u2014 Presidential R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2002, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6159, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6159}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:41:41.383546", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 5960, "n_distinct_geometry": 6180, "quality_index": 3.877, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.933, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.856, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.721, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.729, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.549, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.726, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.278, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.07, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Coalition Lula for President", "winner_candidate": "Luiz In\u00e1cio Lula da Silva", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Coalition Big Alliance", "margin": 22.54, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "BRA", "year": 2002, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1328", "name": "Bulgaria 2016 \u2014 Presidential R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Bulgaria", "year": 2016, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12340, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 14, "cast_exceeds_registered": 508, "turnout_100_pct": 53}, "n_stations_flagged": 561, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:39:58.072028", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.876, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.667, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.561, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.876, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.255, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.286, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.572, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.667, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.561, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.515, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.515, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.527, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Independent, officially supported by Socialist Party", "winner_candidate": "Rumen Radev", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "GERB", "margin": 23.21, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "BGR", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1327", "name": "Bulgaria 2017 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Bulgaria", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12441, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 26, "cast_exceeds_registered": 519, "turnout_100_pct": 47}, "n_stations_flagged": 566, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:39:14.295452", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.606, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.624, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.521, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.606, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.577, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.025, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.347, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.508, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.627, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.521, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.482, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.482, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.539, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.539, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.73, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.73, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Independent, officially supported by Socialist Party", "winner_candidate": "Rumen Radev", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "GERB", "margin": 23.21, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "BGR", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1326", "name": "Netherlands 2012 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Netherlands", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 9514, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 9514}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:36:43.928819", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 9505, "n_distinct_geometry": 5359, "quality_index": 3.877, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.939, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.872, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.825, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.937, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.807, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.317, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.872, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.016, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1325", "name": "Dominican Republic 2010 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominican Republic", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13568, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 13568}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:35:41.521036", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.145, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.784, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.625, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.145, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.537, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.662, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.516, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.629, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.204, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.568, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.326, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.326, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.417, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.417, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1323", "name": "Dominican Republic 2008 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominican Republic", "year": 2008, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13075, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 23, "turnout_100_pct": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 33, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:33:20.018535", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12720, "n_distinct_geometry": 1765, "quality_index": 3.272, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.03, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.638, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.376, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.272, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.03, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.572, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.529, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.204, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.389, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.638, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.376, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.376, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.335, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.422, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Partido de la Liberacion Dominicana (PLD)", "winner_candidate": "Leonel Antonio Fernandez Reyna", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Partido Revolucionario Dominicano (PRD)", "margin": 13.35, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "DOM", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1322", "name": "Italy 1996 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) [Proportional tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 proportional_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 1996, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8117, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8117}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:31:35.799556", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.823, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.884, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.835, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.75, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.823, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.884, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.208, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.694, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.764, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.935, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.245, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.245, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1321", "name": "Netherlands 2010 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Netherlands", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 9581, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 9581}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:30:31.967255", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 9572, "n_distinct_geometry": 4686, "quality_index": 3.872, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.939, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.874, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.828, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.872, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.802, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.311, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.578, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.016, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1320", "name": "Italy 1987 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) [Proportional tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 proportional_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 1987, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8093, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8093}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:28:47.195351", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.823, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.877, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.82, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.725, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.823, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.205, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.146, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.634, "year": 1987, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.725, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.725, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.744, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.333, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.333, "year": 1987, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1319", "name": "Paraguay 2013 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Paraguay", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17460, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 17460}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:26:12.741908", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 17460, "n_distinct_geometry": 531, "quality_index": 3.036, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.946, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.585, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.407, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.036, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.791, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.448, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.286, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.377, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.585, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.585, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.407, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.407, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.229, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.229, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Asociacion Nacional Republicana-Partido Colorado (ANR-PC)", "winner_candidate": "Horacio Cartes", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Alianza Paraguay Alegre (APE)", "margin": 9.43, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PRY", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1318", "name": "Italy 1994 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) [Proportional tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 proportional_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 1994, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8117, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8117}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:25:30.001783", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.538, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.883, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.83, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.743, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.205, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.694, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.761, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.69, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.743, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.935, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1317", "name": "Zimbabwe 2018 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Zimbabwe", "year": 2018, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10960, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 10960}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:18:15.368598", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 10856, "n_distinct_geometry": 1766, "quality_index": 1.422, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.651, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.313, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.216, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.422, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.355, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.651, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.016, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.504, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.997, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.563, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.213, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.044, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.261, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.313, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.313, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.216, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.216, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.185, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.185, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.428, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.428, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.38, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.38, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.771, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.532, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.532, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1316", "name": "Brazil 2002 \u2014 Presidential R2 (SAGE, per-station) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2002, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6159, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6159}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:17:31.765182", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 5960, "n_distinct_geometry": 6180, "quality_index": 3.877, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.933, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.856, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.721, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.729, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.549, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.726, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.278, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.07, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Coalition Lula for President", "winner_candidate": "Luiz In\u00e1cio Lula da Silva", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Coalition Big Alliance", "margin": 22.54, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "BRA", "year": 2002, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1315", "name": "Dominican Republic 2002 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominican Republic", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11518, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 11518}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:15:28.189664", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 11487, "n_distinct_geometry": 1251, "quality_index": 3.672, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.335, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.672, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.388, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.672, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.335, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.692, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.715, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.529, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.204, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.214, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.672, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.388, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.35, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.35, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.429, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1314", "name": "Dominican Republic 2016 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominican Republic", "year": 2016, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 16262, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 175, "cast_exceeds_registered": 31, "turnout_100_pct": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 37, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:14:35.736013", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.812, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.731, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.571, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.333, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.812, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.731, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.683, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.529, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.409, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.993, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.748, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.398, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.571, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.333, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.333, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.299, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.299, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.451, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.451, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Partido de la Liberacion Dominicana (PLD)", "winner_candidate": "Danilo Medina", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Partido Revolucionario Moderno (PRM)", "margin": 26.76, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "DOM", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1313", "name": "Italy 1983 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) [Proportional tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 proportional_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 1983, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8088, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8088}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:12:51.627446", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.824, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.881, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.806, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.146, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.531, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 1983, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.295, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1312", "name": "Paraguay 2018 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Paraguay", "year": 2018, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21206, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 21206}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:10:03.880119", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 21016, "n_distinct_geometry": 543, "quality_index": 3.007, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.225, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.583, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.417, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.007, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.225, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.677, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.584, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.396, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.753, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.608, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.402, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.583, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.583, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.417, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.417, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.237, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.237, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.786, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.739, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "National Republican Association \u2013 Colorado Party (ANR)", "winner_candidate": "Mario Abdo Ben\u00edtez", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "GANAR Alliance", "margin": 3.88, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PRY", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1311", "name": "Italy 1979 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) [Proportional tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 proportional_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 1979, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8080, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8080}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:09:15.058314", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.826, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.879, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.763, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.664, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.826, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.879, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.084, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 1979, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.146, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 1979, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.524, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 1979, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 1979, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.664, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.664, "year": 1979, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.658, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 1979, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 1979, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.186, "year": 1979, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1309", "name": "Italy 1972 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) [Proportional tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 proportional_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 1972, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8055, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8055}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:07:14.699101", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.886, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.742, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.64, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.08, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.146, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.209, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 1972, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.742, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.64, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.64, "year": 1972, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.638, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 1972, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1972, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.186, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 1972, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1308", "name": "Italy 1953 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) [Proportional tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 proportional_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 1953, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7849, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 7849}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:05:40.568718", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.829, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.875, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.684, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.552, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.083, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 1953, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1953, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.435, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 1953, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.223, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.556, "year": 1953, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.684, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.684, "year": 1953, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.552, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 1953, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.508, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.508, "year": 1953, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 1953, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.671, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1953, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.194, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.194, "year": 1953, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 1953, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1307", "name": "Italy 1958 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) [Proportional tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 proportional_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 1958, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7983, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 7983}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:04:56.680649", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.822, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.885, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.709, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.593, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1958, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1958, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1958, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.078, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 1958, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.146, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 1958, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 1958, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 1958, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.709, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 1958, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.593, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.593, "year": 1958, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.549, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 1958, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 1958, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.771, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 1958, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.194, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.194, "year": 1958, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 1958, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1306", "name": "Dominican Republic 2004 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominican Republic", "year": 2004, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12203, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 12203}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:02:52.737311", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 12070, "n_distinct_geometry": 1368, "quality_index": 3.66, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.632, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.659, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.379, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.66, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.632, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.69, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.599, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.529, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.204, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.659, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.379, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.379, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.344, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.344, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.433, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.433, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Partido de la Liberacion Dominicana (PLD)", "winner_candidate": "Leonel Fern\u00e1ndez Reyna", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Partido Revolucionario Dominicano (PRD)", "margin": 23.46, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "DOM", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1305", "name": "Paraguay 2008 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Paraguay", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14306, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 14306}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T05:00:37.458492", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 14306, "n_distinct_geometry": 548, "quality_index": 3.019, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.858, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.62, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.493, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.019, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.374, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.728, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.432, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.019, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.204, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.479, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.62, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.62, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.493, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.493, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.289, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Alianza Patri\u00f3tica para el Cambio (APC)", "winner_candidate": "Fernando Lugo", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Associati\u00f3n Nacional Republicana (Colorado) (ANR-PC            )", "margin": 10.65, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PRY", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1304", "name": "Paraguay 2013 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Paraguay", "year": 2013, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17520, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 17520}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:59:03.626656", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 17460, "n_distinct_geometry": 531, "quality_index": 3.036, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.946, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.585, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.407, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.036, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.791, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.448, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.286, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.377, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.585, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.585, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.407, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.407, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.229, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.229, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Asociacion Nacional Republicana-Partido Colorado (ANR-PC)", "winner_candidate": "Horacio Cartes", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Alianza Paraguay Alegre (APE)", "margin": 9.43, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PRY", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1303", "name": "New Zealand 1999 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "New Zealand", "year": 1999, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4379, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 4379}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:57:29.399284", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 4062, "n_distinct_geometry": 2793, "quality_index": 3.761, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.886, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.88, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.825, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.761, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.71, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.665, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.009, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.009, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1302", "name": "South Korea 2002 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 2002, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13715, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 13715}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:55:35.604455", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.894, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.911, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.761, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.911, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.698, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.68, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.185, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.046, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1301", "name": "Italy 1968 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) [Proportional tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 proportional_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 1968, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8055, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8055}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:54:53.180889", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.822, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.885, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.729, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.62, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.076, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 1968, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.146, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 1968, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.211, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 1968, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.729, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 1968, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.62, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.62, "year": 1968, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.61, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 1968, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.872, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 1968, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.186, "year": 1968, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.787, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 1968, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1300", "name": "Italy 1976 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) [Proportional tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 proportional_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 1976, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8065, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8065}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:53:20.495267", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.826, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.883, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.758, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.661, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.826, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.853, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.146, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.758, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.758, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.656, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.186, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1299", "name": "Serbia 2000 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Serbia", "year": 2000, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8170, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 217}, "n_stations_flagged": 217, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:52:47.888700", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.815, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.87, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.364, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.272, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.718, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.791, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.698, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.433, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.358, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.547, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.637, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.394, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.132, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.533, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.364, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.364, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.272, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.272, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.3, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.3, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.685, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Democratic Opposition of Serbia (DOS)", "winner_candidate": "Vojislav Ko\u0161tunica", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Socialist Party of Serbia (SPS)", "margin": 13.09, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "SRB", "year": 2000, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1298", "name": "Italy 1948 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) [Proportional tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 proportional_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 1948, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7658, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 7658}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:51:14.686018", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.821, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.881, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.623, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.506, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1948, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1948, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 1948, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.745, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 1948, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1948, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.435, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 1948, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.211, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 1948, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.623, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 1948, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 1948, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.452, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 1948, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 1948, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.671, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1948, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.194, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.194, "year": 1948, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.747, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.747, "year": 1948, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1297", "name": "Italy 1963 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) [Proportional tier] (SAGE, per-station) \u2014 proportional_tier", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 1963, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8037, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8037}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:50:30.744456", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.825, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.883, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.728, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.618, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 1963, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1963, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1963, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.078, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 1963, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.146, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 1963, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 1963, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.225, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.556, "year": 1963, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1963, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 1963, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.608, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.608, "year": 1963, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 1963, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 1963, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.186, "year": 1963, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.787, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 1963, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1296", "name": "Taiwan 2000 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Taiwan", "year": 2000, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13305, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:48:57.359270", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.575, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.821, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.772, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.674, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.575, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.118, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.392, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.674, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.668, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.346, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.346, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Democratic Progressive Party", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent - James Soong", "margin": 2.49, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "TWN", "year": 2000, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1295", "name": "Taiwan 1996 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Taiwan", "year": 1996, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12595, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:48:15.202892", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.168, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.877, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.505, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.389, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.168, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.727, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.267, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.507, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.627, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.598, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.836, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 1996, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.505, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.389, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.389, "year": 1996, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.435, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.435, "year": 1996, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.38, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.38, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Kuomintang", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Democratic Progressive Party", "margin": 36.52, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "TWN", "year": 1996, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1294", "name": "Bulgaria 2016 \u2014 Presidential R2 (SAGE, per-station) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Bulgaria", "year": 2016, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12340, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 14, "cast_exceeds_registered": 477, "turnout_100_pct": 53}, "n_stations_flagged": 530, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:46:41.869012", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.876, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.667, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.561, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.876, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.255, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.286, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.572, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.667, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.561, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.515, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.515, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.527, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Independent, officially supported by Socialist Party", "winner_candidate": "Rumen Radev", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "GERB", "margin": 23.21, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "BGR", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1293", "name": "Egypt 2014 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Egypt", "year": 2014, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14040, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 141}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:45:37.351834", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 13338, "n_distinct_geometry": 300, "quality_index": 1.356, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.037, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.137, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.085, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.356, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.339, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.037, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.259, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 0.472, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.118, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.302, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.061, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.265, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.251, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.313, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.18, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.137, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.137, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.085, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.085, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.079, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.079, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.172, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.568, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.568, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.689, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.171, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.171, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "Abdel Fattah el-Sisi", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Popular Current", "margin": 93.82, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "EGY", "year": 2014, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1292", "name": "Serbia 2003 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Serbia", "year": 2003, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8589, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:44:03.728888", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.954, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.916, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.646, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.53, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.419, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.192, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.72, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.222, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.53, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.53, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.492, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.492, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.621, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": null, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "SRB", "year": 2003, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1291", "name": "Portugal 2011 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4260, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:43:30.962970", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 4260, "n_distinct_geometry": 4020, "quality_index": 3.896, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.884, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.829, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.677, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.721, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.644, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.091, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.091, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Social Democratic Party, People's Party", "winner_candidate": "A. Cavaco Silva", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Socialist Party, Left Bloc, Democratic Party of the Atlantic, Portuguese Workers' Communist Party", "margin": 33.21, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "PRT", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1289", "name": "Japan 2012 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3989, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 3989}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:40:43.631819", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 3989, "n_distinct_geometry": 1577, "quality_index": 3.894, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.947, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.848, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.774, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.947, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.591, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.567, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.202, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.108, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.108, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1288", "name": "Japan 2021 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3991, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 3991}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:39:20.394200", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 3991, "n_distinct_geometry": 1693, "quality_index": 3.858, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.926, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.824, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.736, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.147, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.045, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.045, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1287", "name": "Japan 2026 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2026, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3852, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 3852}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:38:46.840912", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 3850, "n_distinct_geometry": 1742, "quality_index": 3.838, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.819, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.734, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.758, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.758, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.05, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1286", "name": "Portugal 2009 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4257, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:38:13.881326", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 4257, "n_distinct_geometry": 4020, "quality_index": 3.896, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.894, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.838, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.874, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.721, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.629, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.657, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.894, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.809, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.091, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.091, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1285", "name": "Japan 2009 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4105, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 4105}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:36:39.206323", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 4105, "n_distinct_geometry": 1596, "quality_index": 3.892, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.947, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.854, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.779, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.947, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.583, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.478, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.108, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.108, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.924, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1284", "name": "Serbia 2007 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Serbia", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8462, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:36:07.438041", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.979, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.74, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.628, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.527, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.979, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.74, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.198, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.01, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.502, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.72, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.982, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.759, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.628, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.527, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.48, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.48, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.656, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic Party", "winner_candidate": "B. Tadi\u0107", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Serbian Radical Party", "margin": 2.34, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "SRB", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1283", "name": "Croatia 2019 \u2014 Presidential R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Croatia", "year": 2019, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6533, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6533}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:35:03.656679", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 6190, "n_distinct_geometry": 5109, "quality_index": 3.66, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.942, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.734, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.617, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.66, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.421, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.403, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.386, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.617, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.617, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.582, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.823, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.293, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.293, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1282", "name": "Japan 2017 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4040, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 4040}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:32:58.200883", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 4040, "n_distinct_geometry": 1782, "quality_index": 3.87, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.933, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.821, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.744, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.789, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.567, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.247, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.744, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.743, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.093, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1281", "name": "Serbia 2008 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Serbia", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8525, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:32:26.322978", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.979, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.74, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.628, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.525, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.979, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.74, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.198, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.986, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.982, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.759, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.628, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.656, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.637, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.637, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic Party", "winner_candidate": "B. Tadi\u0107", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Serbian Radical Party", "margin": 2.34, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "SRB", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1280", "name": "Paraguay 2008 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Paraguay", "year": 2008, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14306, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 14306}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:30:12.215264", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 14306, "n_distinct_geometry": 548, "quality_index": 3.019, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.858, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.62, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.493, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.019, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.374, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.728, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.432, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.019, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.204, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.479, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.62, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.62, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.493, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.493, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.289, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Alianza Patri\u00f3tica para el Cambio (APC)", "winner_candidate": "Fernando Lugo", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Associati\u00f3n Nacional Republicana (Colorado) (ANR-PC            )", "margin": 10.65, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PRY", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1279", "name": "Japan 2014 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Japan", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3966, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 3966}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:29:38.665222", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 3966, "n_distinct_geometry": 1557, "quality_index": 3.887, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.942, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.815, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.739, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.578, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.567, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.235, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.739, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.098, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.098, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1278", "name": "Bosnia and Herzegovina 2018 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Bosnia and Herzegovina", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6552, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:28:05.630888", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 6546, "n_distinct_geometry": 1370, "quality_index": 2.533, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.571, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.513, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.34, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.471, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.631, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.432, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.608, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.513, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.513, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.34, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.34, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.368, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.628, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.696, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.685, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1277", "name": "Portugal 1976 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 1976, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4189, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 214, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:27:34.268782", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3970, "n_distinct_geometry": 4378, "quality_index": 3.138, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.801, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.513, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.455, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.138, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.801, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.545, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.031, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.508, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.265, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.459, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.513, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.513, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.455, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 1976, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.46, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.46, "year": 1976, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.084, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.084, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "A. Ramalho Eanes", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 45.13, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "PRT", "year": 1976, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1276", "name": "Portugal 1987 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 1987, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4196, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 63}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:27:02.133227", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3967, "n_distinct_geometry": 4378, "quality_index": 3.693, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.864, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.809, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.693, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.859, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.444, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.674, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.48, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.62, "year": 1987, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.809, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.105, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.105, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Socialist Part (PS)", "winner_candidate": "M. Soares", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Democratic and Social Centre, Social Democratic Party (CDS)", "margin": 2.36, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "PRT", "year": 1986, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1275", "name": "Portugal 2005 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4247, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:25:38.133995", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 4042, "n_distinct_geometry": 4017, "quality_index": 3.845, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.958, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.889, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.835, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.952, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.668, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.651, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.663, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.088, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.088, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.969, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Social Democratic Party, People's Party", "winner_candidate": "A. Cavaco Silva", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 29.8, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "PRT", "year": 2006, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1274", "name": "Portugal 1995 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 1995, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4189, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:25:06.162453", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3964, "n_distinct_geometry": 4378, "quality_index": 3.694, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.936, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.861, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.806, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.694, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.449, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.674, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.49, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.1, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.1, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Socialist Party", "winner_candidate": "J. Sampaio", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Social Democratic Party, People's Party", "margin": 7.82, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "PRT", "year": 1996, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1273", "name": "Portugal 2002 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4249, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:24:33.000930", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 4044, "n_distinct_geometry": 4017, "quality_index": 3.696, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.929, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.876, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.821, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.696, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.929, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.453, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.484, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.876, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.088, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.088, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "J. Sampaio", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Social Democratic Party, People's Party", "margin": 20.87, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "PRT", "year": 2001, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1272", "name": "Portugal 1999 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 1999, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4202, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:23:08.794095", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3997, "n_distinct_geometry": 4378, "quality_index": 3.689, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.868, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.815, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.689, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.451, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.674, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.088, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.088, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1271", "name": "Portugal 1983 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 1983, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4191, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 173}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:21:45.299753", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3965, "n_distinct_geometry": 4378, "quality_index": 3.676, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.936, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.857, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.8, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.676, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.558, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.674, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.487, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 1983, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.107, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.107, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1270", "name": "Portugal 1980 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 1980, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4196, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 178}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:21:12.371585", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3967, "n_distinct_geometry": 4378, "quality_index": 3.194, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.815, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.841, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.776, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.194, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.565, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.674, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.486, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 1980, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.107, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.107, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "A. Ramalho Eanes", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Democratic Alliance", "margin": 16.21, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "PRT", "year": 1980, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1269", "name": "Portugal 1985 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 1985, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4189, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 128}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:20:39.307466", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3961, "n_distinct_geometry": 4378, "quality_index": 3.693, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.8, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.864, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.807, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.693, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.8, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.443, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.674, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.474, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 1985, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.807, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 1985, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 1985, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.107, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.107, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1985, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Socialist Part (PS)", "winner_candidate": "M. Soares", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Democratic and Social Centre, Social Democratic Party (CDS)", "margin": 2.36, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "PRT", "year": 1986, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1268", "name": "Portugal 2019 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3068, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:20:17.635296", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3060, "n_distinct_geometry": 3318, "quality_index": 3.875, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.942, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.886, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.82, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.842, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.436, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.971, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.105, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.105, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1267", "name": "Portugal 1979 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 1979, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4198, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 178, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:18:53.537643", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3969, "n_distinct_geometry": 4378, "quality_index": 3.194, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.815, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.753, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.687, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.194, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 1979, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.542, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.565, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.265, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 1979, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.459, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.486, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 1979, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.753, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.753, "year": 1979, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.687, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 1979, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.655, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 1979, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.086, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.086, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "A. Ramalho Eanes", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Democratic Alliance", "margin": 16.21, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "PRT", "year": 1980, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1266", "name": "Serbia 2004 \u2014 Presidential R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Serbia", "year": 2004, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8584, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:18:22.310895", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.954, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.916, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.634, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.521, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.419, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.192, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.72, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.222, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.634, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.634, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.521, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.482, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.482, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.903, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic Party", "winner_candidate": "B. Tadi\u0107", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Serbian Radical Party", "margin": 7.94, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "SRB", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1265", "name": "Georgia 2020 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Georgia", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3795, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 3795}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:17:49.525612", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 3635, "n_distinct_geometry": 1807, "quality_index": 2.457, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.392, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.616, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.47, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.457, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.392, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.348, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.798, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.402, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.35, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.548, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.637, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.678, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.264, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.566, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.616, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.47, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.47, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.903, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.61, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.123, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.123, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1264", "name": "Portugal 2015 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3092, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:17:17.408573", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3084, "n_distinct_geometry": 3318, "quality_index": 3.891, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.952, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.887, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.829, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.952, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.605, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.565, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.887, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.093, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.093, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.972, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Social Democratic Party, People's Party", "winner_candidate": "M. Rebelo de Sousa", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independen", "margin": 29.12, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "PRT", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1263", "name": "Portugal 2011 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 2011, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4250, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:15:53.705509", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 4250, "n_distinct_geometry": 4020, "quality_index": 3.896, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.884, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.829, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.677, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.721, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.644, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.091, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.091, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Social Democratic Party, People's Party", "winner_candidate": "A. Cavaco Silva", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Socialist Party, Left Bloc, Democratic Party of the Atlantic, Portuguese Workers' Communist Party", "margin": 33.21, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "PRT", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1262", "name": "Serbia 2002 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Serbia", "year": 2002, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8615, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:15:22.113376", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.954, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.916, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.61, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.499, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.662, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.192, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.72, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.142, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.61, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.499, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.499, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.465, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.465, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.901, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.621, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": null, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "SRB", "year": 2002, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1261", "name": "Croatia 2014 \u2014 Presidential R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Croatia", "year": 2014, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6350, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6350}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:14:39.089447", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 6038, "n_distinct_geometry": 5170, "quality_index": 3.866, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.936, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.823, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.704, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.324, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.169, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.542, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.823, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.302, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.302, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Croatian Democratic Union", "winner_candidate": "K. Grabar-Kitarovi\u0107", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 1.48, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "HRV", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1259", "name": "Portugal 2006 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 2006, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4250, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:12:51.928449", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 4048, "n_distinct_geometry": 3887, "quality_index": 3.845, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.958, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.894, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.839, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.952, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.668, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.651, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.663, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.894, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.091, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.091, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Social Democratic Party, People's Party", "winner_candidate": "A. Cavaco Silva", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 29.8, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "PRT", "year": 2006, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1258", "name": "Costa Rica 2022 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Costa Rica", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2100, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:12:30.143599", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2100, "n_distinct_geometry": 2054, "quality_index": 3.845, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.936, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.866, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.813, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.944, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.813, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.813, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.193, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.924, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1257", "name": "Slovenia 2026 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Slovenia", "year": 2026, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3085, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 104, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:11:06.574732", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2965, "n_distinct_geometry": 2734, "quality_index": 3.839, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.914, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.692, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.589, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.839, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.722, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.548, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.744, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.692, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.589, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.589, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.604, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.604, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.078, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.078, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.691, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1256", "name": "Croatia 2019 \u2014 Presidential R2 (SAGE, per-station) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Croatia", "year": 2019, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6533, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6533}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:10:23.864382", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 6190, "n_distinct_geometry": 5109, "quality_index": 3.66, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.942, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.734, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.617, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.66, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.421, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.403, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.386, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.617, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.617, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.582, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.823, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.293, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.293, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1255", "name": "Croatia 2014 \u2014 Presidential R2 (SAGE, per-station) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Croatia", "year": 2014, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6352, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6352}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:08:49.313922", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 6038, "n_distinct_geometry": 5170, "quality_index": 3.866, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.936, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.823, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.704, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.324, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.169, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.542, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.823, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.302, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.302, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Croatian Democratic Union", "winner_candidate": "K. Grabar-Kitarovi\u0107", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 1.48, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "HRV", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1254", "name": "Croatia 2025 \u2014 Presidential R2 (SAGE, per-station) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Croatia", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6755, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6755}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:08:05.612809", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 6428, "n_distinct_geometry": 4700, "quality_index": 3.415, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.925, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.686, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.593, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.415, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.925, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.793, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.286, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.106, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.453, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.613, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.593, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.593, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.543, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.254, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.254, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.743, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1253", "name": "Portugal 1980 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 1980, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4188, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 178, "cast_exceeds_registered": 10, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 11, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:07:30.686947", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3969, "n_distinct_geometry": 4378, "quality_index": 3.194, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.815, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.841, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.776, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.194, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.565, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.674, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.486, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 1980, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.107, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.107, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "A. Ramalho Eanes", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Democratic Alliance", "margin": 16.21, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "PRT", "year": 1980, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1252", "name": "Serbia 2008 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Serbia", "year": 2008, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8546, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:06:06.111302", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.979, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.74, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.628, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.525, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.979, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.74, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.198, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.986, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.982, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.759, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.628, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.656, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.637, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.637, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic Party", "winner_candidate": "B. Tadi\u0107", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Serbian Radical Party", "margin": 2.34, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "SRB", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1251", "name": "Portugal 1986 \u2014 Presidential R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 1986, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4194, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 86}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:05:33.939725", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3968, "n_distinct_geometry": 4378, "quality_index": 3.693, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.933, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.86, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.805, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.693, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.443, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.674, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.474, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 1986, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 1986, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 1986, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.105, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.105, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Socialist Part (PS)", "winner_candidate": "M. Soares", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Democratic and Social Centre, Social Democratic Party (CDS)", "margin": 2.36, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "PRT", "year": 1986, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1250", "name": "Slovakia 2019 \u2014 Presidential R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Slovakia", "year": 2019, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5940, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 5940}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:04:50.732169", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 5940, "n_distinct_geometry": 1606, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.32, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.841, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.32, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.535, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.668, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.911, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.287, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.287, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1249", "name": "Portugal 2001 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 2001, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4189, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:03:28.041615", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3992, "n_distinct_geometry": 4378, "quality_index": 3.686, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.929, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.871, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.816, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.686, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.929, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.444, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.674, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.487, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.816, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.788, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.088, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.088, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "J. Sampaio", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Social Democratic Party, People's Party", "margin": 20.87, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "PRT", "year": 2001, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1248", "name": "Paraguay 2003 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Paraguay", "year": 2003, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8401, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8401}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:02:34.922623", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 8401, "n_distinct_geometry": 540, "quality_index": 2.945, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.89, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.565, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.409, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.46, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.486, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.204, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.258, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.315, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.565, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.565, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.409, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.409, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.216, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.216, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.589, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.589, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.693, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.693, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Partido Colorado (PC)", "winner_candidate": "Oscar Nicanor Duarte Frutos", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Partido Liberal Radical Aut\u00e9ntico (PLRA)", "margin": 13.6, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PRY", "year": 2003, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1247", "name": "Portugal 1991 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 1991, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4173, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 18}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:02:02.906136", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3944, "n_distinct_geometry": 4378, "quality_index": 3.676, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.859, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.803, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.676, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.674, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.481, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.62, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.105, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.105, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "M. Soares", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Democratic and Social Centre", "margin": 56.19, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "PRT", "year": 1991, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1246", "name": "Portugal 1976 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 1976, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4199, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 214, "turnout_100_pct": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:00:39.184555", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3970, "n_distinct_geometry": 4378, "quality_index": 3.138, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.801, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.513, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.455, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.138, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.801, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.545, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.031, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.508, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.265, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 1976, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.459, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.513, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.513, "year": 1976, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.455, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 1976, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.46, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.46, "year": 1976, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.084, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.084, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1976, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "A. Ramalho Eanes", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 45.13, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "PRT", "year": 1976, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1245", "name": "Costa Rica 2022 \u2014 Presidential R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Costa Rica", "year": 2022, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2152, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-08-24T04:00:17.725438", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2100, "n_distinct_geometry": 2054, "quality_index": 3.845, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.936, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.866, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.813, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.944, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.813, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.813, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.193, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.924, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1244", "name": "Portugal 2016 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 2016, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3071, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:59:53.954299", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3063, "n_distinct_geometry": 3318, "quality_index": 3.891, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.952, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.888, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.83, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.952, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.605, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.565, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.888, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.104, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.104, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Social Democratic Party, People's Party", "winner_candidate": "M. Rebelo de Sousa", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independen", "margin": 29.12, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "PRT", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1243", "name": "Ghana 2020 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Ghana", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 275, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 275}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:59:32.339603", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 275, "n_distinct_geometry": 281, "quality_index": 2.984, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.358, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.718, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.604, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.984, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.358, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.034, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.758, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.377, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.594, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.13, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.264, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.449, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.718, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.718, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.604, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.604, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.515, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.515, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.626, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.626, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1242", "name": "Jamaica 2016 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Jamaica", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6954, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6954}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:57:58.588621", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 6688, "n_distinct_geometry": 1134, "quality_index": 3.859, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.783, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.804, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.685, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.859, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.245, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.338, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.417, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.604, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.685, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.611, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.611, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.899, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.126, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.126, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1241", "name": "Portugal 1986 \u2014 Presidential R2 (SAGE, per-station) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 1986, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4196, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 88}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:57:26.850064", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3968, "n_distinct_geometry": 4378, "quality_index": 3.693, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.933, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.86, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.805, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.693, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.443, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.674, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.474, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 1986, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 1986, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 1986, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.105, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.105, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Socialist Part (PS)", "winner_candidate": "M. Soares", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Democratic and Social Centre, Social Democratic Party (CDS)", "margin": 2.36, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "PRT", "year": 1986, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1240", "name": "Portugal 1996 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 1996, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4189, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:56:53.392857", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3966, "n_distinct_geometry": 4378, "quality_index": 3.694, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.936, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.869, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.816, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.694, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.449, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.674, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.49, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.816, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.092, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.092, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Socialist Party", "winner_candidate": "J. Sampaio", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Social Democratic Party, People's Party", "margin": 7.82, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "PRT", "year": 1996, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1239", "name": "Slovenia 2017 \u2014 Presidential R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Slovenia", "year": 2017, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3376, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 309}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:55:30.925205", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3112, "n_distinct_geometry": 2039, "quality_index": 3.873, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.936, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.84, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.772, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.002, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.853, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.151, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.748, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.748, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.894, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.076, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.076, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Social Democrats (SD) (formally Independent)", "winner_candidate": "Borut Pahor", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "List of Marjan \u0160arec (LMS)", "margin": 6.18, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "SVN", "year": 2017, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1238", "name": "Costa Rica 2018 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Costa Rica", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2086, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:55:08.713195", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2083, "n_distinct_geometry": 2118, "quality_index": 3.893, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.947, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.89, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.834, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.947, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.968, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.992, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.583, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.798, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.198, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Citizens' Action Party (PAC)", "winner_candidate": "Carlos Alvarado", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "National Restoration Party (PRN)", "margin": 21.18, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "CRI", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1237", "name": "Jamaica 2011 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Jamaica", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6543, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6543}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:54:26.394489", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 6291, "n_distinct_geometry": 1155, "quality_index": 3.784, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.788, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.767, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.651, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.788, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.981, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.338, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.511, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.651, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.583, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.583, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.888, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.169, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.169, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1236", "name": "Jamaica 2007 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Jamaica", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6233, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6233}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:52:53.121233", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 6054, "n_distinct_geometry": 904, "quality_index": 3.785, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.783, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.762, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.644, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.785, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.519, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.375, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.594, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.495, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.511, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.644, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.644, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.58, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.58, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.169, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.169, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1235", "name": "Paraguay 2003 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Paraguay", "year": 2003, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8401, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8401}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:52:00.503725", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 8401, "n_distinct_geometry": 540, "quality_index": 2.945, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.89, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.565, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.409, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.46, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.486, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.204, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.258, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.315, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.565, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.565, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.409, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.409, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.216, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.216, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.589, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.589, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.693, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.693, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Partido Colorado (PC)", "winner_candidate": "Oscar Nicanor Duarte Frutos", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Partido Liberal Radical Aut\u00e9ntico (PLRA)", "margin": 13.6, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PRY", "year": 2003, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1234", "name": "Portugal 2021 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 2021, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3092, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:50:36.723735", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3084, "n_distinct_geometry": 3318, "quality_index": 3.863, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.809, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.884, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.81, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.833, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.664, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.771, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.924, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.131, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.131, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1233", "name": "Serbia 2003 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Serbia", "year": 2003, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8577, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:50:05.318738", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.954, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.916, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.646, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.53, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.419, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.192, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.72, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.222, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.53, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.53, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.492, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.492, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.621, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": null, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "SRB", "year": 2003, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1230", "name": "Slovenia 2012 \u2014 Presidential R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Slovenia", "year": 2012, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3678, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 246}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:48:38.700446", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3420, "n_distinct_geometry": 1744, "quality_index": 3.883, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.94, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.847, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.768, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.64, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.219, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.574, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.643, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.935, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.153, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.153, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "ZLSD", "winner_candidate": "Borut Pahor", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 34.74, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "SVN", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1229", "name": "Costa Rica 2018 \u2014 Presidential R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Costa Rica", "year": 2018, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2086, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:48:17.050041", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2083, "n_distinct_geometry": 2118, "quality_index": 3.893, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.947, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.89, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.834, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.947, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.968, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.992, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.583, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.798, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.198, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Citizens' Action Party (PAC)", "winner_candidate": "Carlos Alvarado", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "National Restoration Party (PRN)", "margin": 21.18, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "CRI", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1227", "name": "Slovenia 2012 \u2014 Presidential R2 (SAGE, per-station) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Slovenia", "year": 2012, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3673, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 300}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:46:31.795087", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3415, "n_distinct_geometry": 1846, "quality_index": 3.883, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.94, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.847, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.768, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.64, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.219, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.574, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.643, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.935, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.153, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.153, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "ZLSD", "winner_candidate": "Borut Pahor", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 34.74, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "SVN", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1226", "name": "Slovenia 2017 \u2014 Presidential R2 (SAGE, per-station) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Slovenia", "year": 2017, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3373, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 307}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:46:00.682793", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3111, "n_distinct_geometry": 2039, "quality_index": 3.873, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.936, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.84, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.772, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.002, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.853, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.151, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.748, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.748, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.894, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.076, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.076, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Social Democrats (SD) (formally Independent)", "winner_candidate": "Borut Pahor", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "List of Marjan \u0160arec (LMS)", "margin": 6.18, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "SVN", "year": 2017, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1223", "name": "Georgia 2016 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Georgia", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3625, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 3625}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:43:44.141070", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 3601, "n_distinct_geometry": 1319, "quality_index": 2.997, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.348, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.685, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.518, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.997, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.348, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.472, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.505, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.685, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.518, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.518, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.549, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.632, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.108, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.108, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.899, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1222", "name": "Serbia 2008 \u2014 Presidential R2 (SAGE, per-station) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Serbia", "year": 2008, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8573, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:43:12.686583", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.979, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.74, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.628, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.525, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.979, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.74, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.198, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.986, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.982, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.759, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.628, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.656, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.637, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.637, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic Party", "winner_candidate": "B. Tadi\u0107", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Serbian Radical Party", "margin": 2.34, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "SRB", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1220", "name": "Moldova 2021 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Moldova", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2150, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 30}, "n_stations_flagged": 30, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:41:07.258999", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 1998, "n_distinct_geometry": 1348, "quality_index": 3.569, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.331, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.752, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.618, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.569, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.331, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.55, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.637, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.659, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.592, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.592, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.421, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1219", "name": "Serbia 2004 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Serbia", "year": 2004, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8586, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:40:00.754325", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.954, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.916, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.634, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.521, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.419, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.192, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.72, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.222, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.634, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.634, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.521, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.482, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.482, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.903, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic Party", "winner_candidate": "B. Tadi\u0107", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Serbian Radical Party", "margin": 7.94, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "SRB", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1218", "name": "North Macedonia 2016 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "North Macedonia", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3478, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:38:37.718614", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3475, "n_distinct_geometry": 1668, "quality_index": 2.875, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.463, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.449, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.279, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.463, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.676, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.884, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.471, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.766, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.257, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.607, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.402, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.449, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.279, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.279, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.314, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.314, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.7, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.2, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.2, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.564, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.564, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1217", "name": "Slovakia 2019 \u2014 Presidential R2 (SAGE, per-station) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Slovakia", "year": 2019, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5940, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 5940}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:37:31.447216", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 5940, "n_distinct_geometry": 1606, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.32, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.841, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.737, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.32, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.535, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.668, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.911, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.287, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.287, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1216", "name": "Denmark 2026 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 2026, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1314, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1314}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:37:10.001001", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 1313, "n_distinct_geometry": 1287, "quality_index": 3.823, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.891, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.913, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.884, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.823, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.069, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.876, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.98, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1215", "name": "Samoa 2025 \u2014 Legislative (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Samoa", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 50, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 50}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:36:48.197963", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 50, "n_distinct_geometry": 61, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1214", "name": "Denmark 2015 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1389, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1389}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:36:25.826298", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 1389, "n_distinct_geometry": 1177, "quality_index": 3.834, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.899, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.921, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.894, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.842, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.231, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.058, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.921, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.894, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.002, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.002, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1213", "name": "Lithuania 2019 \u2014 Presidential R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Lithuania", "year": 2019, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2024, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:35:12.527893", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 1971, "n_distinct_geometry": 2034, "quality_index": 3.825, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.932, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.817, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.756, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.578, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.427, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.709, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.935, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.123, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.123, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1211", "name": "Albania 2017 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Albania", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5361, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:34:19.038480", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.657, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.026, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.536, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.437, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.657, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.664, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.026, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.769, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.519, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.38, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.346, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.925, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.536, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.536, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.437, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.378, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.378, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.69, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.69, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.77, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1210", "name": "Denmark 2011 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1389, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1389}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:33:56.069538", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 1389, "n_distinct_geometry": 1177, "quality_index": 3.837, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.908, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.921, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.894, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.837, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.231, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.058, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.921, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.894, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.002, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.002, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1209", "name": "Armenia 2026 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Armenia", "year": 2026, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2006, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1, "turnout_100_pct": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:32:43.657932", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2004, "n_distinct_geometry": 1557, "quality_index": 3.024, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.583, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.614, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.371, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.583, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.051, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.471, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.354, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.589, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.43, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.514, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.491, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.491, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.237, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.237, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.472, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.472, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1208", "name": "Nicaragua 2001 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Nicaragua", "year": 2001, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 9453, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 9453}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:31:51.387500", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 9453, "n_distinct_geometry": 186, "quality_index": 3.221, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.908, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.588, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.373, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.221, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.987, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.747, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.146, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.536, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.797, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.558, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.26, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.565, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 2001, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.281, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.253, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.253, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Partido Liberal Constitucionalista (PLC)", "winner_candidate": "Enrique Bola\u00f1os Geyer", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Frente Sandinista de Liberaci\u00f3n Nacional (FSLN)", "margin": 13.94, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "NIC", "year": 2001, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1207", "name": "Moldova 2014 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Moldova", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2073, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 7}, "n_stations_flagged": 7, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:31:29.983447", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.844, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.064, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.623, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.516, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.064, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.833, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.454, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.235, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.187, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.457, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.623, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.516, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.516, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.466, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.466, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.809, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1206", "name": "Costa Rica 2018 \u2014 Presidential R2 (SAGE, per-station) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Costa Rica", "year": 2018, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2086, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:30:16.743426", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2083, "n_distinct_geometry": 2118, "quality_index": 3.893, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.947, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.89, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.834, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.947, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.968, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.992, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.583, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.798, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.198, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Citizens' Action Party (PAC)", "winner_candidate": "Carlos Alvarado", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "National Restoration Party (PRN)", "margin": 21.18, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "CRI", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1205", "name": "Costa Rica 2022 \u2014 Presidential R2 (SAGE, per-station) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Costa Rica", "year": 2022, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2100, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:29:53.702350", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2100, "n_distinct_geometry": 2054, "quality_index": 3.845, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.936, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.866, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.813, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.944, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.813, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.813, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.193, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.924, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1204", "name": "Moldova 2020 \u2014 Presidential R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Moldova", "year": 2020, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2143, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 24}, "n_stations_flagged": 24, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:29:32.178527", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2003, "n_distinct_geometry": 1371, "quality_index": 3.266, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.573, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.651, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.518, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.573, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.853, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.631, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.859, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.794, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.512, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.651, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.518, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.518, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.492, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.492, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.795, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1203", "name": "Austria 2008 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Austria", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2552, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2552}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:29:10.940267", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.854, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.909, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.872, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.802, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.854, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.872, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1202", "name": "Austria 2010 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Austria", "year": 2010, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2508, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2508}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:28:48.966751", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 2163, "n_distinct_geometry": 2227, "quality_index": 3.848, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.909, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.872, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.803, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.404, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.601, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.872, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "SPO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "FPO", "margin": 64.09, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "AUT", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1201", "name": "Lithuania 2019 \u2014 Presidential R2 (SAGE, per-station) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Lithuania", "year": 2019, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2024, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2, "cast_exceeds_registered": 8, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 9, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:28:27.747611", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 1971, "n_distinct_geometry": 2034, "quality_index": 3.825, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.932, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.817, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.756, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.578, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.427, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.709, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.935, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.123, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.123, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1199", "name": "Austria 2016 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Austria", "year": 2016, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2249, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2249}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:26:52.656541", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 2122, "n_distinct_geometry": 1912, "quality_index": 3.387, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.082, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.848, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.78, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.387, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.082, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.911, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.138, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.292, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.475, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.78, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.746, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.043, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1197", "name": "Kosovo 2026 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Kosovo", "year": 2026, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2498, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:26:10.228787", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2498, "n_distinct_geometry": 916, "quality_index": 3.218, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.406, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.631, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.457, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.218, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.406, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.278, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.441, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.0, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.082, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.104, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.457, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.638, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.348, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.348, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1196", "name": "Moldova 2020 \u2014 Presidential R2 (SAGE, per-station) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Moldova", "year": 2020, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2143, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 18}, "n_stations_flagged": 18, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:25:47.660663", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2003, "n_distinct_geometry": 1371, "quality_index": 3.266, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.573, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.651, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.518, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.573, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.853, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.631, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.859, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.794, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.512, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.651, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.518, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.518, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.492, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.492, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.795, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1195", "name": "Armenia 2013 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Armenia", "year": 2013, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1988, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:25:26.291954", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 1986, "n_distinct_geometry": 1021, "quality_index": 1.075, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 0.865, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.349, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.206, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.075, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.269, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.216, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.3, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.575, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.521, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.13, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.067, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.267, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.989, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.747, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.599, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.349, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.349, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.206, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.206, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.284, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.284, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.251, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.251, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.609, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "RPA", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Heritage", "margin": 22.44, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "ARM", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1193", "name": "Austria 2006 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Austria", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2423, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2423}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:23:50.736150", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.85, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.913, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.861, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.788, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.401, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.788, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.077, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.077, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1192", "name": "Ecuador 2006 \u2014 Presidential R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Ecuador", "year": 2006, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1241, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1241}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:23:29.467147", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 1180, "n_distinct_geometry": 1155, "quality_index": 3.53, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.928, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.693, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.451, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.53, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.487, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.021, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.796, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.297, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.48, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.693, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.693, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.451, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.451, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.399, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.399, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.391, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.391, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.709, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Movimiento Alianza PAIS/PS-FA  (Alianza PAiS      )", "winner_candidate": "Rafael Correa Delgado", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Partido Renovador Institucional Acci\u00f3n Nacional (PRIAN) (PRIAN)", "margin": 13.34, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ECU", "year": 2006, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1190", "name": "Finland 2015 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Finland", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2142, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2142}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:22:45.680473", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 2118, "n_distinct_geometry": 304, "quality_index": 3.874, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.869, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.827, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.874, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.925, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.791, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.707, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.975, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.494, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.976, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.012, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.012, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1189", "name": "Finland 2011 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Finland", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2351, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2351}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:22:23.655747", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.886, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.945, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.884, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.843, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.837, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.578, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.453, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.015, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.015, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.977, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "National Coalition Party", "winner_candidate": "S. Niinist\u00f6", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Green League", "margin": 25.18, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "FIN", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1188", "name": "Ecuador 2017 \u2014 Presidential R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Ecuador", "year": 2017, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1306, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1306}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:22:02.259137", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 1230, "n_distinct_geometry": 1292, "quality_index": 3.047, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.691, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.552, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.338, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.047, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.691, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.386, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.386, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.274, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.109, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.21, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.552, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.338, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.338, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.39, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.39, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.275, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.275, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.627, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.627, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "PAIS Alliance", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "CREO", "margin": 2.32, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ECU", "year": 2017, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1187", "name": "Ecuador 2013 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Ecuador", "year": 2013, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1300, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1300}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:20:50.130080", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 1222, "n_distinct_geometry": 1266, "quality_index": 3.305, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.926, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.538, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.265, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.305, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.25, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.384, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.716, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.538, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.265, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.265, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.378, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.378, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.2, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.2, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.703, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.684, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.684, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Alianza Patria Altiva i Soberana  (Alianza PAiS      )", "winner_candidate": "Rafael Vicente Correa Delgado", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Creando Oportunidades (CREO)", "margin": 34.49, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ECU", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1186", "name": "Guyana 2015 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Guyana", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2284, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:20:28.837075", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2263, "n_distinct_geometry": 479, "quality_index": 3.203, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.401, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.65, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.444, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.203, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.401, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.041, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.265, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.566, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.194, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.595, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.162, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.29, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.65, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.444, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.444, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.463, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.463, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.672, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.416, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.416, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1185", "name": "Austria 1999 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Austria", "year": 1999, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2424, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2424}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:20:05.779590", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.765, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.858, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.857, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.78, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.837, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.461, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.78, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Indpendent (SPO)", "margin": 56.95, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "AUT", "year": 1998, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1184", "name": "Austria 2002 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Austria", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2401, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2401}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:19:43.400522", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.773, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.859, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.858, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.782, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.773, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.859, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.836, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.716, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.474, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.085, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.085, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1183", "name": "Ecuador 2002 \u2014 Presidential R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Ecuador", "year": 2002, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1162, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1162}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:19:21.792595", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 1161, "n_distinct_geometry": 1087, "quality_index": 3.636, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.846, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.689, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.446, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.739, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.69, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.297, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.054, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.513, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.689, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.446, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.446, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.355, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.355, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.703, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Partido Sociedad Patri\u00f3tica 21 de Enero (PSP)", "winner_candidate": "Lucio Guti\u00e9rrez", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Partido Renovador Institucional de Acci\u00f3n Nacional (PRIAN)", "margin": 9.59, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ECU", "year": 2002, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1181", "name": "Ecuador 2009 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Ecuador", "year": 2009, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1248, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1248}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:17:47.375983", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 1184, "n_distinct_geometry": 1247, "quality_index": 3.472, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.92, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.613, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.329, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.472, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.018, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.999, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.25, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.384, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.672, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.418, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.613, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.613, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.329, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.329, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.411, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.411, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.238, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.238, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.66, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Alianza Patria Altiva i Soberana  (Alianza PAiS      )", "winner_candidate": "Rafael Vicente Correa Delgado", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Partido Sociedad Patri\u00f3tica 21 de Enero  (PSP)", "margin": 23.76, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ECU", "year": 2009, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1180", "name": "Finland 2012 \u2014 Presidential R1 (SAGE, per-station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Finland", "year": 2012, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2326, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2326}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:17:25.093792", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.886, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.945, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.885, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.844, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.837, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.578, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.027, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.015, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.015, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.977, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "National Coalition Party", "winner_candidate": "S. Niinist\u00f6", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Green League", "margin": 25.18, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "FIN", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1179", "name": "Finland 2018 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Finland", "year": 2018, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1990, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1990}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:16:40.923452", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 1988, "n_distinct_geometry": 358, "quality_index": 3.873, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.884, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.849, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.924, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.853, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.707, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.98, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.495, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.98, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.018, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.976, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Formally independent, supported by National Coalition Party (NCP) and Christian Democrats (KD)", "winner_candidate": "Sauli Niinist\u00f6", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Green League", "margin": 50.2, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "FIN", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1178", "name": "Botswana 2019 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Botswana", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 57, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:16:18.453208", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 57, "n_distinct_geometry": 63, "quality_index": 2.664, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.481, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.656, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.56, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.664, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.481, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.62, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.032, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.758, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.064, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.516, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.064, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.516, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.34, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.465, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.116, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.656, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.56, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.468, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.468, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.129, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.129, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.795, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1177", "name": "Ecuador 2017 \u2014 Presidential R2 (SAGE, per-station) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Ecuador", "year": 2017, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1306, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1306}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:15:56.189738", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 1230, "n_distinct_geometry": 1292, "quality_index": 3.047, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.691, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.552, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.338, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.047, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.691, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.386, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.386, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.274, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.109, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.21, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.552, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.338, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.338, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.39, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.39, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.275, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.275, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.627, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.627, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "PAIS Alliance", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "CREO", "margin": 2.32, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ECU", "year": 2017, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1176", "name": "Fiji 2022 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Fiji", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 991, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 991}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:15:34.619913", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 974, "n_distinct_geometry": 1171, "quality_index": 2.557, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.983, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.398, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.263, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.983, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.499, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.389, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.136, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.227, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.424, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.106, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.398, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.398, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.263, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.263, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.27, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.27, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.684, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.684, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.454, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.454, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.357, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.357, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.518, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.518, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1174", "name": "Norway 2009 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Norway", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 655, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 655}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:14:51.002672", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 650, "n_distinct_geometry": 530, "quality_index": 3.856, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.92, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.899, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.866, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.791, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.048, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.899, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.971, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.006, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.006, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.976, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1173", "name": "Ecuador 2002 \u2014 Presidential R2 (SAGE, per-station) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Ecuador", "year": 2002, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1162, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1162}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:14:29.988614", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 1161, "n_distinct_geometry": 1087, "quality_index": 3.636, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.846, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.689, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.446, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.739, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.69, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.844, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.297, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.054, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.513, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.689, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.446, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.446, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.355, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.355, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.703, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Partido Sociedad Patri\u00f3tica 21 de Enero (PSP)", "winner_candidate": "Lucio Guti\u00e9rrez", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Partido Renovador Institucional de Acci\u00f3n Nacional (PRIAN)", "margin": 9.59, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ECU", "year": 2002, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1172", "name": "Cyprus 2001 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Cyprus", "year": 2001, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1244, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 10, "turnout_100_pct": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 18, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:13:17.666334", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 1243, "n_distinct_geometry": 455, "quality_index": 3.666, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.662, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.805, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.678, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.662, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.199, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.223, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.556, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.678, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.678, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.672, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 2001, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.184, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.184, "year": 2001, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2001, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1171", "name": "Panama 2004 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Panama", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 615, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 13, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 14, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:11:48.918271", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 584, "n_distinct_geometry": 557, "quality_index": 3.816, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.914, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.737, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.561, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.729, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.24, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.416, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.759, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.69, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.561, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.642, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.642, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.576, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.576, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Partido Revolucionario Democr\u00e1tica (PRD)", "winner_candidate": "Mart\u00edn Torrijos", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Partido Solidaridad (PS)", "margin": 16.57, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PAN", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1170", "name": "Panama 2009 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Panama", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 619, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:10:56.518081", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 588, "n_distinct_geometry": 578, "quality_index": 3.805, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.739, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.549, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.805, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.112, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.24, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.416, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.616, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.739, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.549, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.48, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.48, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.567, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.567, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.576, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.576, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Cambio Democr\u00e1tico (CD)", "winner_candidate": "Ricardo Martinelli Berrocal", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Partido Revolucionario Democr\u00e1tica (PRD)", "margin": 22.38, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PAN", "year": 2009, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1168", "name": "Finland 2012 \u2014 Presidential R2 (SAGE, per-station) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Finland", "year": 2012, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2327, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2327}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:10:13.233879", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.886, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.945, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.885, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.844, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.837, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.578, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.027, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.015, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.015, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.977, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "National Coalition Party", "winner_candidate": "S. Niinist\u00f6", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Green League", "margin": 25.18, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "FIN", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1165", "name": "Hong Kong 2021 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Hong Kong", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 656, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 656}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:09:06.568615", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 656, "n_distinct_geometry": 527, "quality_index": 0.217, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.041, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.205, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.168, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.217, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.054, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.041, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.51, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 0.384, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.096, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.578, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.144, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.198, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.05, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.205, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.168, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.168, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.23, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.23, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.082, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.082, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.243, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.243, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1164", "name": "Bhutan 2018 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Bhutan", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 885, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 885}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:08:44.851322", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 864, "n_distinct_geometry": 340, "quality_index": 3.681, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.863, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.579, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.489, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.681, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.276, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.566, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.539, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.385, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.489, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.489, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.486, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.486, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.744, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.104, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.104, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1160", "name": "Cabo Verde 2026 \u2014 Legislative (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Cape Verde", "year": 2026, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1332, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1332}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:06:24.478583", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 1002, "n_distinct_geometry": 765, "quality_index": 3.775, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.936, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.745, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.631, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.775, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.635, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.271, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.923, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.731, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.482, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.557, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.557, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.288, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1158", "name": "Papua New Guinea 2007 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) R1 (SAGE, per-constituency) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Papua New Guinea", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 85, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 85}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:05:29.116206", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 85, "n_distinct_geometry": 87, "quality_index": 2.036, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.68, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.511, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.396, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.036, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.509, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.68, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.159, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.436, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.599, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.444, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.511, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.511, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.396, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.396, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.287, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.287, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1157", "name": "Hong Kong 2016 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Hong Kong", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 104, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 104}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:05:06.898902", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 104, "n_distinct_geometry": 98, "quality_index": 2.723, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.762, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.333, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.294, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.723, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.156, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.275, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.069, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.333, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.333, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.294, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.294, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.296, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.296, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.088, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.088, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.771, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1156", "name": "Ghana 2020 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Ghana", "year": 2020, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 275, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 275}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:04:44.984205", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 275, "n_distinct_geometry": 281, "quality_index": 2.984, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.358, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.718, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.604, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.984, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.358, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.034, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.758, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.377, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.594, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.13, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.264, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.449, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.718, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.718, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.604, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.604, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.515, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.515, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.626, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.626, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1155", "name": "Iran 2017 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iran", "year": 2017, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 370, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 370}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T03:00:58.699169", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 370, "n_distinct_geometry": 349, "quality_index": 1.972, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.864, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.185, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.134, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.972, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.493, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.282, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.015, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.504, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.147, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.481, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.222, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.056, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.185, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.185, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.134, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.165, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.165, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.272, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.272, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.158, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.158, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.214, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.214, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1150", "name": "Vanuatu 2025 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Vanuatu", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:58:43.431223", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 18, "n_distinct_geometry": 20, "quality_index": 3.718, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.853, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.729, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.623, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.718, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.853, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.796, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.664, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.21, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.766, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.836, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.729, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.623, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.565, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.565, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.911, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.332, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.332, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1148", "name": "Iceland 1991 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 1991, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:58:00.365693", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 8, "n_distinct_geometry": 7, "quality_index": 3.739, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.877, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.862, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.776, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.739, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.303, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.576, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.013, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.013, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "V. Finnbogad\u00f3ttir", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": null, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "ISL", "year": 1992, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1147", "name": "Iceland 1987 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 1987, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:57:39.039237", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 8, "n_distinct_geometry": 7, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.876, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.859, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.876, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.876, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.745, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.304, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.576, "year": 1987, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 1987, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.016, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1987, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "V. Finnbogad\u00f3ttir", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 89.2, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "ISL", "year": 1988, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1145", "name": "Iceland 1995 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 1995, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:56:04.334811", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 8, "n_distinct_geometry": 7, "quality_index": 3.742, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.878, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.862, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.778, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.742, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.874, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.318, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.58, "year": 1995, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.786, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 1995, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.013, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.013, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 1995, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "\u00d3. R. Gr\u00edmsson", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 11.81, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "ISL", "year": 1996, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1144", "name": "Iceland 1999 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 1999, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:55:42.772895", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 8, "n_distinct_geometry": 7, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.874, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.868, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.781, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.874, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.327, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.791, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.013, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.013, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "\u00d3. R. Gr\u00edmsson", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": null, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "ISL", "year": 2000, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1143", "name": "Iceland 1983 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 1983, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:55:21.930149", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 8, "n_distinct_geometry": 7, "quality_index": 3.747, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.879, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.845, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.741, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.747, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.879, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.867, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.742, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.297, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 1983, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.741, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.755, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 1983, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1983, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "V. Finnbogad\u00f3ttir", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": null, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "ISL", "year": 1984, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1142", "name": "Iceland 1978 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 1978, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:55:01.127744", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 8, "n_distinct_geometry": 7, "quality_index": 3.745, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.881, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.826, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.722, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.745, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.867, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.727, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 1978, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 1978, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 1978, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1978, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 1978, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1141", "name": "Iceland 1974 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 1974, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:54:40.642914", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 8, "n_distinct_geometry": 7, "quality_index": 3.74, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.883, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.826, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.719, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.74, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.325, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 1974, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 1974, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.719, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 1974, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 1974, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 1974, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1140", "name": "Iceland 1971 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 1971, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:54:19.753074", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 8, "n_distinct_geometry": 7, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.874, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.825, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.717, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.874, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.872, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.74, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.3, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.575, "year": 1971, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 1971, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1971, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.725, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.725, "year": 1971, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 1971, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "K. Eldj\u00e1rn", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": null, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "ISL", "year": 1972, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1139", "name": "Iceland 1979 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 1979, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:53:54.266995", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 8, "n_distinct_geometry": 7, "quality_index": 3.74, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.886, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.827, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.722, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.74, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.292, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 1979, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 1979, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 1979, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 1979, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 1979, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "V. Finnbogad\u00f3ttir", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 1.5, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "ISL", "year": 1980, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1138", "name": "Iceland 1959 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 1959, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:53:33.584765", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 8, "n_distinct_geometry": 7, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.883, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.808, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.701, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.731, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.307, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 1959, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 1959, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.701, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 1959, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.69, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.69, "year": 1959, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.928, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1959, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": null, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "ISL", "year": 1960, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1137", "name": "Iceland 1967 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 1967, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:53:12.831861", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 8, "n_distinct_geometry": 7, "quality_index": 3.74, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.879, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.824, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.719, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.74, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1967, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.879, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1967, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1967, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1967, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1967, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1967, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.315, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 1967, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 1967, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.719, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 1967, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 1967, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1967, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1967, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 1967, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1967, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "K. Eldj\u00e1rn", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 31.2, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "ISL", "year": 1968, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1136", "name": "Iceland 1963 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 1963, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:52:51.573890", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 8, "n_distinct_geometry": 7, "quality_index": 3.735, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.873, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.808, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.702, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1963, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1963, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1963, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1963, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1963, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1963, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.309, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 1963, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 1963, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.702, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 1963, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.697, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.697, "year": 1963, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1963, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1963, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 1963, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1963, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": null, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "ISL", "year": 1964, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1135", "name": "Papua New Guinea 1992 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) R1 (SAGE, per-constituency) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Papua New Guinea", "year": 1992, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 88, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 88}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:52:29.473746", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 88, "n_distinct_geometry": 88, "quality_index": 2.821, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.977, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.545, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.418, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.705, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.977, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.641, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.031, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.258, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.436, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 1992, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 1992, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.595, "year": 1992, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 1992, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.418, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.418, "year": 1992, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.297, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.297, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 1992, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1132", "name": "Papua New Guinea 2007 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) R2 (SAGE, per-constituency) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Papua New Guinea", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 30, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 30}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:51:26.184009", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 30, "n_distinct_geometry": 36, "quality_index": 2.036, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.68, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.511, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.396, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.036, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.509, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.68, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.159, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.436, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.599, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.444, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.511, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.511, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.396, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.396, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.287, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.287, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1129", "name": "Luxembourg 2018 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Luxembourg", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 102, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 102}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:50:22.738361", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 102, "n_distinct_geometry": 103, "quality_index": 3.811, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.909, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.874, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.793, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.905, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.473, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.026, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1128", "name": "Luxembourg 2013 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Luxembourg", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 106, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 106}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:50:02.085669", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 106, "n_distinct_geometry": 103, "quality_index": 3.82, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.911, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.873, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.792, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.82, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.911, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.901, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.651, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.366, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.026, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1127", "name": "Ireland 2016 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Ireland", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2, "cast_exceeds_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:49:41.092523", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 40, "n_distinct_geometry": 39, "quality_index": 3.89, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.948, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.886, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.815, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.613, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.308, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.238, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.059, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.771, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1126", "name": "Ireland 2020 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Ireland", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 39, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:49:19.641246", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 39, "n_distinct_geometry": 39, "quality_index": 3.888, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.944, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.891, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.824, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.944, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.938, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.046, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.78, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.032, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.032, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1124", "name": "Solomon Islands 2019 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Solomon Islands", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 50, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 50}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:48:38.000618", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 50, "n_distinct_geometry": 44, "quality_index": 3.445, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.485, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.656, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.503, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.445, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.485, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.689, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.622, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.411, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.656, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.503, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.388, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.78, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.622, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1121", "name": "Vanuatu 2016 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Vanuatu", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:46:43.112923", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 18, "n_distinct_geometry": 20, "quality_index": 3.617, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.69, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.771, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.661, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.617, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.69, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.684, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.198, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.462, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.771, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.903, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.427, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1120", "name": "Dominica 2014 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominica", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 250, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 250}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:46:22.161396", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 250, "n_distinct_geometry": 82, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1119", "name": "Timor-Leste 2018 \u2014 Legislative (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Timor-Leste", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 67, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 67}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:46:01.227228", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 65, "n_distinct_geometry": 70, "quality_index": 3.638, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.91, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.689, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.502, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.638, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.84, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.132, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.651, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.663, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.005, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.689, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.502, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.502, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.431, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.348, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.348, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "FRETILIN", "winner_candidate": "Francisco Guterres", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Democratic Party", "margin": 24.6, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "TLS", "year": 2017, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1116", "name": "Ireland 2011 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Ireland", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 43, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 43}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:44:58.772107", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.954, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.821, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.308, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.192, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.048, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.036, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.036, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.975, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Labour Party", "winner_candidate": "M. D. Higgins", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 21.3, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "IRL", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1115", "name": "Iceland 2013 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:44:38.209129", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 6, "n_distinct_geometry": 6, "quality_index": 3.835, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.926, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.858, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.775, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.366, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.592, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.012, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.012, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.921, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "\u00d3. R. Gr\u00edmsson", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 19.62, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "ISL", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1114", "name": "Dominica 2019 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominica", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 255, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 255}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:44:17.589770", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 252, "n_distinct_geometry": 84, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1113", "name": "Ireland 2007 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Ireland", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 43, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 43}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:43:55.726523", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.951, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.891, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.815, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.952, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.84, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.308, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.203, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.975, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1112", "name": "Ireland 2002 \u2014 Legislative (lower house) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Ireland", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 42, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 42}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:43:30.916444", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.828, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.883, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.807, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.828, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.308, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.103, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.026, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.807, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1111", "name": "Vanuatu 2004 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Vanuatu", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:43:08.370483", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 17, "n_distinct_geometry": 20, "quality_index": 3.0, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.098, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.615, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.517, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.0, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.098, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.726, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.198, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.487, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.615, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.517, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.499, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.499, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.887, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.441, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.441, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1110", "name": "Iceland 2016 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:42:44.307571", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 6, "n_distinct_geometry": 6, "quality_index": 3.824, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.86, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.776, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.837, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.366, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.592, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.012, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.012, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "G. Th. J\u00f3hannesson", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 10.98, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "ISL", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1109", "name": "Vanuatu 2020 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Vanuatu", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:42:23.502867", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 18, "n_distinct_geometry": 20, "quality_index": 3.718, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.658, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.78, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.659, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.718, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.658, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.45, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.21, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.705, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.426, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.78, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.659, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.604, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.604, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.876, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.352, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.352, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1108", "name": "Brazil 2002 \u2014 Presidential [Abroad] (SAGE, per-constituency) \u2014 abroad_voting", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2002, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 102, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 102}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:42:02.943483", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.877, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.933, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.856, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.721, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.729, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.549, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.726, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.278, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.07, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Coalition Lula for President", "winner_candidate": "Luiz In\u00e1cio Lula da Silva", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Coalition Big Alliance", "margin": 22.54, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "BRA", "year": 2002, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1107", "name": "Iceland 2017 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:41:38.391990", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 6, "n_distinct_geometry": 6, "quality_index": 3.824, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.861, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.779, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.837, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.327, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.392, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.366, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.592, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.012, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.012, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.939, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "G. Th. J\u00f3hannesson", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 10.98, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "ISL", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1106", "name": "Gambia 2021 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Gambia", "year": 2021, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 53, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 53}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:41:14.176232", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 53, "n_distinct_geometry": 47, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1105", "name": "Vanuatu 2002 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Vanuatu", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:40:53.323738", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 17, "n_distinct_geometry": 20, "quality_index": 3.013, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.1, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.619, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.519, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.013, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.753, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.1, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.417, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.604, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.742, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.435, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.198, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.489, "year": 2002, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.619, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.519, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.519, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.503, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.887, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.441, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.441, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1104", "name": "Iceland 2021 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:40:32.639169", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 6, "n_distinct_geometry": 6, "quality_index": 3.459, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.469, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.836, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.745, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.459, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.469, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.164, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.575, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.416, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.604, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1102", "name": "Iceland 2009 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:39:42.900366", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 6, "n_distinct_geometry": 6, "quality_index": 3.834, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.925, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.796, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.925, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.352, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.013, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.013, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "\u00d3. R. Gr\u00edmsson", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": null, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "ISL", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1101", "name": "Iceland 2003 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 2003, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:39:18.821581", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 6, "n_distinct_geometry": 6, "quality_index": 3.738, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.877, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.867, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.781, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.869, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.74, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.316, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.013, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.013, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "\u00d3. R. Gr\u00edmsson", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 73.09, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "ISL", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1100", "name": "Iceland 2007 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:38:58.167503", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 6, "n_distinct_geometry": 6, "quality_index": 3.834, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.924, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.873, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.787, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.924, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.364, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.787, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.013, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.013, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "\u00d3. R. Gr\u00edmsson", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": null, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "ISL", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1099", "name": "Iceland 2012 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 2012, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:38:37.767695", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.835, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.926, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.875, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.794, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.366, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.592, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.013, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.013, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "\u00d3. R. Gr\u00edmsson", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 19.62, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "ISL", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1098", "name": "Liechtenstein 2021 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Liechtenstein", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 11}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:38:15.141600", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 11, "n_distinct_geometry": 10, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1097", "name": "Seychelles 2020 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Seychelles", "year": 2020, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 26, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 26}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:37:48.360111", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 25, "n_distinct_geometry": 24, "quality_index": 3.81, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.502, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.666, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.575, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.502, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.371, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.479, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.72, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.656, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.664, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.666, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.575, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.575, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.076, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.076, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1096", "name": "Liechtenstein 2017 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Liechtenstein", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 11}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:37:24.314039", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 11, "n_distinct_geometry": 10, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1095", "name": "Liechtenstein 2013 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Liechtenstein", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 11}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:37:02.881168", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 11, "n_distinct_geometry": 10, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1094", "name": "Iceland 1996 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 1996, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:36:38.901441", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.737, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.885, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.869, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.783, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.314, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 1996, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.791, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.013, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.013, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "\u00d3. R. Gr\u00edmsson", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 11.81, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "ISL", "year": 1996, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1093", "name": "Iceland 1980 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 1980, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:36:14.950310", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.74, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.886, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.849, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.744, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.74, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.292, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 1980, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.744, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 1980, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 1980, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "V. Finnbogad\u00f3ttir", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 1.5, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "ISL", "year": 1980, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1092", "name": "Liechtenstein 2005 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Liechtenstein", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 11}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:35:49.846956", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 11, "n_distinct_geometry": 10, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1091", "name": "Liechtenstein 2001 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Liechtenstein", "year": 2001, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 11}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:35:26.521914", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 11, "n_distinct_geometry": 10, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1090", "name": "Liechtenstein 2009 \u2014 Legislative (unicameral) (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Liechtenstein", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 11}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:35:03.802654", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 11, "n_distinct_geometry": 10, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1089", "name": "Iceland 2004 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 2004, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:34:38.020672", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.754, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.877, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.867, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.782, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.874, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.725, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.308, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.013, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.013, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "\u00d3. R. Gr\u00edmsson", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 73.09, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "ISL", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1088", "name": "Iceland 1952 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 1952, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:33:56.313375", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.74, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.884, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.802, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.694, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.74, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 1952, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.884, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1952, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.746, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1952, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1952, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1952, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1952, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.288, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.572, "year": 1952, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 1952, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 1952, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.685, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 1952, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.928, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 1952, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1952, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 1952, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 1952, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Social Democratic Party", "winner_candidate": "\u00c1. \u00c1sgeirsson", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Independence Party - Progressive Party.", "margin": 2.8, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "ISL", "year": 1952, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1087", "name": "Iceland 1988 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 1988, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:33:33.533700", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.738, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.878, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.859, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.77, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.725, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 1988, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.77, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 1988, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.78, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 1988, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.016, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1988, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "V. Finnbogad\u00f3ttir", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 89.2, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "ISL", "year": 1988, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1086", "name": "Iceland 1968 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 1968, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-24T02:32:51.027945", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.737, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.877, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.824, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.719, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.736, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.315, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 1968, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 1968, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.719, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 1968, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 1968, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1968, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "K. Eldj\u00e1rn", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 31.2, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "ISL", "year": 1968, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1085", "name": "Venezuela 2013 \u2014 Presidential (SAGE, per-station)", "metadata": {"country": "Venezuela", "year": 2013, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 39259, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 215, "cast_exceeds_registered": 12, "turnout_100_pct": 11}, "n_stations_flagged": 23, "created_at": "2026-08-23T05:57:02.866432", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 38904, "n_distinct_geometry": 3308, "quality_index": 2.157, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.408, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.327, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.109, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.157, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.539, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.408, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.241, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.31, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.651, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.163, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.167, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.18, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.327, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.327, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.109, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.109, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.226, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.226, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.598, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.43, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.43, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Gran Polo Patriotico-Partido Socialista Unido de Venezuela (GPP-PSUV)", "winner_candidate": "Nicolas Maduro Moros", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Mesa de la Unidad Democratica (MUD)", "margin": 1.5, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "VEN", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1083", "name": "Brazil 2018 - Presidential Round 2 (per urna) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2018, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 93580, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 93580}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-22T07:59:13.462488", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 92914, "n_distinct_geometry": 61461, "quality_index": 3.51, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.659, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.749, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.608, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.51, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.659, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.632, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.246, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.285, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.608, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.608, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.446, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.446, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.785, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1082", "name": "Brazil 2014 - Presidential Round 2 (per urna) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2014, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 94192, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 94192}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-22T07:51:36.658831", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 93437, "n_distinct_geometry": 63643, "quality_index": 3.969, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.02, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.873, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.783, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.969, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.992, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.02, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.096, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.287, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.072, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.626, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.626, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "With the strength of the people", "winner_candidate": "Dilma Rouseff", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Change, Brazil", "margin": 3.28, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "BRA", "year": 2014, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1081", "name": "Brazil 2014 - Presidential Round 1 (per urna) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2014, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 94194, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 94194}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-22T07:43:55.610711", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 93439, "n_distinct_geometry": 63643, "quality_index": 3.969, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.02, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.873, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.783, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.969, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.992, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.02, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.096, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.287, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.072, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.626, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.626, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "With the strength of the people", "winner_candidate": "Dilma Rouseff", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Change, Brazil", "margin": 3.28, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "BRA", "year": 2014, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1079", "name": "Brazil 2022 Senador (TSE bweb, se\u00e7\u00e3o level) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 471010, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 14}, "n_stations_flagged": 14, "created_at": "2026-08-20T19:43:14.887016", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1078", "name": "US 2022 U.S. House (MEDSL precincts)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 160637, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 160637}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-20T19:28:50.021070", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1077", "name": "Pakistan 2018 \u2014 National Assembly (SAGE / Cookman Form-47 re-key, per polling station)", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 79030, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 82, "cast_exceeds_registered": 18, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 19, "created_at": "2026-08-20T19:16:25.536108", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 79030, "n_distinct_geometry": 257, "quality_index": 1.98, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.493, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.395, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.25, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.98, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.495, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.493, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.104, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.526, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.159, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.869, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.435, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.25, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.25, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.134, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1076", "name": "Zambia 2021 \u2014 Presidential (per constituency)", "metadata": {"country": "Zambia", "year": 2021, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 156, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-20T13:52:04.186523", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.663, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.428, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.421, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.339, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.428, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.879, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.47, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.154, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.61, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.421, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.339, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.339, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.274, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.274, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.676, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1075", "name": "US 2022 U.S. Senate (MEDSL precincts)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 111561, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 111561}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-20T13:45:14.111542", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1074", "name": "US 2022 Governor (MEDSL precincts, 34 states + AK)", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "National multi-contest dataset filtered to office == GOVERNOR from the MEDSL 2022 State Offices precinct file. Per-(state, candidate) vote columns, NULL off-ballot (sparse wide, same convention as iceland_sveitarstjorn / us_2024_president_precinct). Ballot-accounting rows excluded; mode double-counting removed; fusion party lines summed; per-state write-in bucket. Reconciles per contest to state SoS toplines (FL DeSantis 59.4, TX Abbott 54.8, NY Hochul 53.2 [two-way], GA Kemp 53.4).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 126176, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 126176}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-20T13:38:20.153292", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1073", "name": "Uganda 2011 \u2014 Presidential (per polling station, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Uganda", "year": 2011, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 23968, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 36}, "n_stations_flagged": 36, "created_at": "2026-08-20T13:36:06.923614", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 23964, "n_distinct_geometry": 8040, "quality_index": 1.378, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.682, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.317, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.233, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.378, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.344, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.42, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.475, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.369, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.208, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.01, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.253, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.284, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.473, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.317, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.317, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.233, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.233, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.21, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.21, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.528, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.528, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.348, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.348, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.649, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "NRM", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "FDC", "margin": 44.02, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "UGA", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1072", "name": "Uganda 2006 \u2014 Presidential (per polling station, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Uganda", "year": 2006, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19786, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 36}, "n_stations_flagged": 36, "created_at": "2026-08-20T13:35:03.119025", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.247, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.508, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.318, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.243, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.247, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.312, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.508, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.377, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.361, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.34, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.088, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.272, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.326, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.332, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.431, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.358, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.318, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.243, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.243, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.213, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.213, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.367, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.367, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.787, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "NRM", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "FDC", "margin": 21.87, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "UGA", "year": 2006, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1071", "name": "Turkey 2018 \u2014 Parliamentary (closed-list PR, per sand\u0131k)", "metadata": {"country": "Turkey", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 180065, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1, "cast_exceeds_registered": 3183, "turnout_100_pct": 1301}, "n_stations_flagged": 4484, "created_at": "2026-08-20T13:28:33.612308", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.372, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.454, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.295, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.104, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.372, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.593, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.454, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.507, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.377, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.35, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.21, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.092, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.295, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.104, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.104, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.228, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.228, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.357, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.357, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.15, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.15, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.198, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Justice and Development Party (AK)", "winner_candidate": "Recep Tayyip Erdo\u011fan", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Republican People's Party (CHP)", "margin": 21.95, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "TUR", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1070", "name": "Turkey 2015 (November) \u2014 Grand National Assembly (per ballot box)", "metadata": {"country": "Turkey", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "critical", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 174992, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8, "cast_exceeds_registered": 2076, "turnout_100_pct": 892}, "n_stations_flagged": 2968, "created_at": "2026-08-20T13:19:02.010286", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 174992, "n_distinct_geometry": 45907, "quality_index": 2.606, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.425, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.388, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.23, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.606, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.425, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.139, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.465, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.236, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.352, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.129, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.282, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.388, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.23, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.23, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.292, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.78, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.352, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.352, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Justice and Development Party (AK)", "winner_candidate": "Recep Tayyip Erdo\u011fan", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Joint candidate of several (heterogeneous) opposition parties", "margin": 13.35, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "TUR", "year": 2014, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1068", "name": "Tunisia 2014 \u2014 Presidential, Round 2 runoff (per polling station, SAGE) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Tunisia", "year": 2014, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10572, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 10572}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-20T13:07:47.779505", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 10562, "n_distinct_geometry": 2268, "quality_index": 3.497, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.78, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.745, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.632, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.497, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.497, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.558, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.695, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.44, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.11, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.632, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.34, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.34, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Nidaa Tounes", "winner_candidate": "Beji Caid Essebsi", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Congress for the Republic (CPR)", "margin": 11.36, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "TUN", "year": 2014, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1067", "name": "Tunisia 2014 \u2014 Presidential, Round 1 (per polling station, SAGE) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Tunisia", "year": 2014, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10504, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 10504}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-20T13:07:05.211915", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 10494, "n_distinct_geometry": 1515, "quality_index": 3.497, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.78, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.745, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.632, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.497, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.497, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.558, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.695, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.44, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.11, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.632, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.34, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.34, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Nidaa Tounes", "winner_candidate": "Beji Caid Essebsi", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Congress for the Republic (CPR)", "margin": 11.36, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "TUN", "year": 2014, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1066", "name": "Slovakia NR SR 2020 party-list per-okrsok (volby.statistics.sk)", "metadata": {"country": "Slovakia", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5998, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-08-20T13:06:11.321462", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.68, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.84, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.757, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.68, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.606, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.472, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.658, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.211, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.211, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1065", "name": "Serbia 2022 - Presidential (per polling station, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Serbia", "year": 2022, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8267, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-08-20T13:05:56.298992", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.248, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.289, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.357, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.259, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.248, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.289, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.231, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.558, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.388, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.347, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.463, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.499, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.143, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.286, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.357, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.357, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.259, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.259, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.469, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.437, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1064", "name": "Serbia 2022 - National Assembly (per polling station, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Serbia", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8267, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-08-20T13:04:58.708268", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.248, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.289, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.357, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.259, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.248, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.289, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.231, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.558, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.388, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.347, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.463, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.499, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.143, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.286, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.357, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.357, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.259, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.259, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.469, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.437, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1063", "name": "Serbia 2020 - National Assembly (per polling station, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Serbia", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8433, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-08-20T13:04:42.389845", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.764, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.64, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.349, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.244, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.764, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.441, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.64, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.486, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.24, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.454, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.617, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.261, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.315, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.349, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.349, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.244, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.244, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.306, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.671, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.443, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1062", "name": "Serbia 2017 - Presidential (per polling station, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Serbia", "year": 2017, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8396, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-08-20T13:03:35.279921", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 8287, "n_distinct_geometry": 6044, "quality_index": 2.242, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.167, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.376, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.29, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.242, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.56, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.167, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.056, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.514, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.208, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.638, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.484, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.376, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.376, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.29, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.29, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.306, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.797, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.488, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.446, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.446, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1061", "name": "Serbia 2016 - National Assembly (per polling station, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Serbia", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8364, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-08-20T13:03:19.337175", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.297, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.38, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.411, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.321, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.297, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.38, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.251, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.315, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.836, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.484, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.411, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.411, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.321, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.321, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.329, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.329, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.524, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.709, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.493, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.493, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1060", "name": "Serbia 2014 - National Assembly (per polling station, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Serbia", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8387, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-08-20T13:03:02.655815", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.556, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.367, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.44, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.35, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.367, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.444, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.611, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.312, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.305, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.576, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.836, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.514, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.379, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.44, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.35, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.35, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.35, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.35, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.556, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.556, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.654, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.528, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.528, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1059", "name": "Serbia 2012 - Presidential, Second Round (per polling station, SAGE) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Serbia", "year": 2012, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8391, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-08-20T13:02:02.854746", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.813, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.753, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.593, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.486, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.753, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.994, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.982, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.679, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.42, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.593, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.593, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.486, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.486, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.453, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.453, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.903, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.653, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Serbian Radical Party", "winner_candidate": "T. Nikoli\u0107", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Choice for a Better Life", "margin": 2.23, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "SRB", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1058", "name": "Serbia 2012 - Presidential, First Round (per polling station, SAGE) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Serbia", "year": 2012, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8391, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-08-20T13:01:44.110348", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.813, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.753, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.593, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.486, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.753, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.994, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.982, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.679, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.42, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.593, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.593, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.486, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.486, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.453, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.453, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.903, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.653, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Serbian Radical Party", "winner_candidate": "T. Nikoli\u0107", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Choice for a Better Life", "margin": 2.23, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "SRB", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1053", "name": "Russia 2000 - Presidential (per UIK) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 2000, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Tag: academic_replication (EFToolkit / Mebane-Kalinin). station_id = regname|commission|uik. region=federal subject, sub_region=territorial commission (TIK). No per-UIK coordinates in source.\n", "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 91306, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 4220}, "n_stations_flagged": 4220, "created_at": "2026-08-20T12:54:12.526503", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.555, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.096, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.403, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.223, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.555, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.096, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.751, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.493, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.862, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.466, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.431, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.182, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.403, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.223, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.223, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.283, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.283, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.787, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.602, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "Vladimir Putin", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Communist Party of the Russian Federation", "margin": 23.9, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "RUS", "year": 2000, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1052", "name": "Philippines 2016 \u2014 Vice-President (COMELEC transparency server, per clustered precinct)", "metadata": {"country": "Philippines", "year": 2016, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 unofficial", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "unofficial"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 90642, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 208}, "n_stations_flagged": 208, "created_at": "2026-08-20T12:50:30.671468", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.065, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.576, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.485, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.346, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.576, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.719, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.353, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.527, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.382, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.695, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.485, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.346, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.346, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.24, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.24, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.647, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.691, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.744, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1051", "name": "Peru 2016 \u2014 President, first round (per mesa) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Peru", "year": 2016, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 77307, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 454}, "n_stations_flagged": 454, "created_at": "2026-08-20T12:47:11.643152", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.55, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.713, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.788, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.673, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.55, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.713, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.66, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.334, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.396, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.35, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.788, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.673, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.673, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.504, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.504, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.894, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.823, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.527, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Peruanos Por el Kambio (PPK)", "winner_candidate": "Pedro Pablo Kuczynski", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Fuerza Popular (FP)", "margin": 0.24, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PER", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1050", "name": "Peru 2006 \u2014 President, first round (per mesa) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Peru", "year": 2006, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 88481, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2, "turnout_100_pct": 66}, "n_stations_flagged": 66, "created_at": "2026-08-20T12:42:55.398969", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.78, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.845, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.792, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.652, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.391, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.67, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.501, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.652, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.478, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.478, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.531, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.531, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.917, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Partido Aprista Peruano (PAP)", "winner_candidate": "Alan Garc\u00eda", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Uni\u00f3n por el Per\u00fa (Partido Nacionalista Peruano) (UP )", "margin": 5.25, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "PER", "year": 2006, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1049", "name": "Panama 2024 \u2014 Presidential (per mesa)", "metadata": {"country": "Panama", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier3_citizen \u00b7 preliminary", "authority_tier": "tier3_citizen", "publication_status": "preliminary"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7574, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 117, "cast_exceeds_registered": 54, "turnout_100_pct": 12}, "n_stations_flagged": 66, "created_at": "2026-08-20T12:41:51.178200", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.751, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.945, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.728, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.578, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.751, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.826, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.553, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.24, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.479, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.42, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.578, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.578, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.471, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.471, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.888, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.694, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.484, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.484, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1048", "name": "Nigeria 2003 Presidential - Plateau State (Beber-Scacco replication)", "metadata": {"country": "Nigeria", "year": 2003, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "academic_replication. valid=Sum(30 party cols); invalid=rejects; cast=totalvotes (source-reported total, differs from valid+invalid at 508 stations - original-PV arithmetic slips preserved as-is).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2580, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 19, "turnout_100_pct": 197}, "n_stations_flagged": 216, "created_at": "2026-08-20T12:41:44.292845", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.275, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.428, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.304, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.275, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.319, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.486, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.407, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.102, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.396, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.771, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.686, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.428, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.428, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.304, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.304, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.242, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.242, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.636, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.636, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.5, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.5, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "PDP", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "ANPP", "margin": 29.75, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "NGA", "year": 2003, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1047", "name": "Mozambique 2009 - Presidential (per polling station, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Mozambique", "year": 2009, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12366, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 67, "turnout_100_pct": 14}, "n_stations_flagged": 81, "created_at": "2026-08-20T12:40:22.223424", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12273, "n_distinct_geometry": 499, "quality_index": 2.092, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.209, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.453, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.307, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.092, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.523, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.209, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.264, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.075, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.269, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.221, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.305, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.649, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.453, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.453, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.307, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.307, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.289, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.747, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.747, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.519, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.519, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "FRELIMO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "RENAMO", "margin": 58.6, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MOZ", "year": 2009, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1046", "name": "Mozambique 2009 - Legislative (per polling station, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Mozambique", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12345, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 69, "turnout_100_pct": 19}, "n_stations_flagged": 88, "created_at": "2026-08-20T12:39:29.701765", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12252, "n_distinct_geometry": 499, "quality_index": 2.092, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.209, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.453, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.307, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.092, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.523, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.209, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.264, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.075, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.269, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.221, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.305, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.649, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.453, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.453, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.307, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.307, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.289, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.747, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.747, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.519, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.519, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "FRELIMO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "RENAMO", "margin": 58.6, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MOZ", "year": 2009, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1045", "name": "Mozambique 2004 - Presidential (per polling station, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Mozambique", "year": 2004, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11924, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 25, "turnout_100_pct": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 27, "created_at": "2026-08-20T12:38:26.365197", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 11865, "n_distinct_geometry": 427, "quality_index": 2.609, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.581, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.425, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.296, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.693, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.46, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.285, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.321, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.261, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.315, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.432, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.358, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.425, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.425, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.296, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.296, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.283, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.283, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.69, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.69, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.519, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.519, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "FRELIMO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "RENAMO", "margin": 32.0, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MOZ", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1044", "name": "Mozambique 2004 - Legislative (per polling station, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Mozambique", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11902, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 28, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 29, "created_at": "2026-08-20T12:37:06.050490", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 11845, "n_distinct_geometry": 427, "quality_index": 2.609, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.581, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.425, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.296, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.693, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.46, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.285, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.321, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.261, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.315, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.432, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.358, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.425, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.425, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.296, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.296, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.283, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.283, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.69, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.69, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.519, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.519, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "FRELIMO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "RENAMO", "margin": 32.0, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MOZ", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1043", "name": "Mozambique 1999 - Presidential (per polling station, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Mozambique", "year": 1999, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3452, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 66, "cast_exceeds_registered": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-08-20T12:36:55.537240", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3452, "n_distinct_geometry": 442, "quality_index": 1.738, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.208, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.453, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.298, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.208, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.512, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.273, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.285, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.321, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.324, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.433, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.358, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.453, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.453, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.298, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.298, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.295, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.682, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "FRELIMO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "RENAMO", "margin": 4.0, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MOZ", "year": 1999, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1042", "name": "Mozambique 1999 - Legislative (per polling station, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Mozambique", "year": 1999, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3452, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 93, "cast_exceeds_registered": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-08-20T12:36:45.483043", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3452, "n_distinct_geometry": 442, "quality_index": 1.738, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.208, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.453, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.298, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.738, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.208, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.552, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.512, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.273, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.285, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.321, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.324, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.433, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.358, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.453, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.453, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.298, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.298, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.295, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.682, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "FRELIMO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "RENAMO", "margin": 4.0, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MOZ", "year": 1999, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1041", "name": "Mozambique 1994 - Presidential (per polling station, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Mozambique", "year": 1994, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7114, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 21, "turnout_100_pct": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 24, "created_at": "2026-08-20T12:35:34.748359", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 7114, "n_distinct_geometry": 541, "quality_index": 2.686, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.853, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.246, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.199, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.686, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.853, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.775, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.923, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.301, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.325, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.324, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.44, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.36, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.199, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.199, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.186, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.595, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.595, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.44, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "FRELIMO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "RENAMO", "margin": 19.0, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MOZ", "year": 1994, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1040", "name": "Mozambique 1994 - Legislative (per polling station, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Mozambique", "year": 1994, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7114, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 14, "turnout_100_pct": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 18, "created_at": "2026-08-20T12:35:14.212228", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 7114, "n_distinct_geometry": 541, "quality_index": 2.686, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.853, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.246, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.199, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.686, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.853, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.775, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.923, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.301, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.325, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.324, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.44, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.36, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.199, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.199, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.186, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.595, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.595, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.44, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "FRELIMO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "RENAMO", "margin": 19.0, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MOZ", "year": 1994, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1039", "name": "Montenegro 2020 \u2014 Parliament / Skupstina (per polling station)", "metadata": {"country": "Montenegro", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1217, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 7}, "n_stations_flagged": 7, "created_at": "2026-08-20T12:35:11.051532", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.0, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.801, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.5, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.395, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.0, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.5, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.801, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.489, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.507, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.377, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.757, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.792, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.448, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.5, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.5, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.424, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.5, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.5, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.788, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1038", "name": "Montenegro 2016 \u2014 Parliament / Skupstina (per polling station)", "metadata": {"country": "Montenegro", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1206, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-08-20T12:35:07.775802", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.765, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.541, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.484, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.383, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.441, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.541, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.311, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.578, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.997, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.515, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.379, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.799, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.575, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.484, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.484, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.383, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.383, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.787, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1037", "name": "Montenegro 2013 \u2014 President (per polling station) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Montenegro", "year": 2013, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1169, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-20T12:35:05.201813", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.122, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.622, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.494, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.394, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.122, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.53, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.622, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.467, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.617, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.515, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.379, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.799, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.563, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.391, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.494, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.494, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.401, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.401, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.78, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic Party of Socialists of Montenegro (DPS)", "winner_candidate": "Filip Vujanovi\u0107", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Formally independent, supported by (and leader of) Democratic Front", "margin": 2.42, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "MNE", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1035", "name": "Malaysia GE12 (2008) \u2014 Dewan Rakyat (federal House), FPTP (per constituency, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 222, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 222}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:38:48.342858", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 222, "n_distinct_geometry": 237, "quality_index": 2.273, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.896, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.328, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.216, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.273, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.568, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.454, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.177, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.11, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.596, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.149, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.328, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.216, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.216, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.236, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.236, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.635, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.594, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.594, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.328, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1034", "name": "Denmark 2022 \u2014 Folketing (per polling-district / afstemningsomr\u00e5de)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1347, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:38:44.839115", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.823, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.891, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.915, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.887, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.823, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.069, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.887, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.986, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.002, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.002, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.985, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1033", "name": "Denmark 2019 \u2014 Folketing (per polling-district / afstemningsomr\u00e5de)", "metadata": {"country": "Denmark", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1384, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:38:41.611667", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.821, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.898, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.916, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.886, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.898, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.916, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.002, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.002, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1032", "name": "Mauritania 2024 Presidential (SAGE / CENI, per bureau)", "metadata": {"country": "Mauritania", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4503, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 3, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:32:17.598084", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 4451, "n_distinct_geometry": 244, "quality_index": 1.962, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.354, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.337, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.136, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.962, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.49, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.354, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.589, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.684, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.297, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.324, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.331, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.333, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.515, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.379, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.385, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.346, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.337, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.337, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.136, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.531, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.531, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.167, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.167, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1031", "name": "Malaysia GE15 (2022) \u2014 Dewan Rakyat (federal House), FPTP (per voting stream, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 35603, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 35603}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:27:41.259938", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 34617, "n_distinct_geometry": 7404, "quality_index": 2.615, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.647, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.459, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.316, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.615, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.647, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.21, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.012, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.561, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.39, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.226, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.343, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.343, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.368, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.615, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1030", "name": "Malaysia GE14 (2018) \u2014 Dewan Rakyat (federal House), FPTP (per voting stream, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 27891, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 27891}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:24:58.857878", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 26951, "n_distinct_geometry": 7038, "quality_index": 2.75, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.893, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.444, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.319, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.75, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.576, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.644, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.394, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.348, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.255, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.314, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.146, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.169, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.444, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.444, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.319, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.319, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.334, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.334, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.271, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.271, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.634, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.634, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1029", "name": "Malaysia GE13 (2013) \u2014 Dewan Rakyat (federal House), FPTP (per voting stream, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Malaysia", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 25153, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 25153}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:22:28.922335", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 24237, "n_distinct_geometry": 5982, "quality_index": 2.086, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.004, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.321, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.206, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.086, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.452, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.613, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.333, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.333, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.177, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.11, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.698, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.174, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.321, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.321, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.206, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.206, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.225, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.225, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.615, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.578, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.578, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.574, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.315, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.315, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1028", "name": "Madagascar 2024 \u2014 National Assembly (per bureau de vote, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Madagascar", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 27540, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 189, "turnout_100_pct": 194}, "n_stations_flagged": 383, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:20:16.440462", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 26571, "n_distinct_geometry": 13575, "quality_index": 1.139, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.218, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.403, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.201, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.139, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.285, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.218, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.304, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.253, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.427, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.357, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.169, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.344, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.336, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.403, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.179, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.179, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.689, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.244, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.244, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.658, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1027", "name": "Madagascar 2023 \u2014 Presidential (per bureau de vote, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Madagascar", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 27371, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 108, "turnout_100_pct": 184}, "n_stations_flagged": 292, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:17:24.544556", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 27301, "n_distinct_geometry": 13760, "quality_index": 1.139, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 0.98, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.461, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.225, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.139, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.285, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 0.98, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.245, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.253, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.427, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.357, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.169, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.344, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.336, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.461, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.461, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.225, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.225, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.705, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.705, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.244, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.244, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.658, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1026", "name": "Madagascar 2018 \u2014 Presidential round 2 (per bureau de vote, SAGE) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Madagascar", "year": 2018, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 24844, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 30, "turnout_100_pct": 42}, "n_stations_flagged": 72, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:15:23.098837", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 24766, "n_distinct_geometry": 12909, "quality_index": 2.389, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.317, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.481, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.268, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.389, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.317, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.064, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.406, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.712, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.428, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.387, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.347, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.467, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.367, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.481, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.268, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.268, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.232, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.232, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.355, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.355, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1025", "name": "Madagascar 2018 \u2014 Presidential round 1 (per bureau, SAGE; partial ~75%) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Madagascar", "year": 2018, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 preliminary", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "preliminary"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18677, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 10, "turnout_100_pct": 30}, "n_stations_flagged": 40, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:13:33.705251", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 18623, "n_distinct_geometry": 9819, "quality_index": 2.389, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.317, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.481, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.268, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.389, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.317, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.064, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.406, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.712, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.428, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.387, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.347, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.467, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.367, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.481, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.268, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.268, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.232, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.232, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.355, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.355, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1024", "name": "Lebanon 2022 \u2014 Parliament (per qalam, open-list PR, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Lebanon", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12001, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 12001, "outside_country": 5141}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:11:50.711694", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 6860, "n_distinct_geometry": 2039, "quality_index": 2.796, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.831, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.405, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.25, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.796, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.232, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.223, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.398, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.349, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.404, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.405, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.405, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.25, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.25, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.253, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.253, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.648, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.502, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.502, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1023", "name": "Lebanon 2018 \u2014 Parliament (per qalam, open-list PR, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Lebanon", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 9607, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 9607, "outside_country": 2772}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:10:15.212332", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 6826, "n_distinct_geometry": 2117, "quality_index": 2.86, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.018, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.44, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.282, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.018, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.797, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.067, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.267, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.268, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.317, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.334, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.334, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.39, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.44, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.282, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.282, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.242, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.242, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.692, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.495, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.495, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1022", "name": "Latvia 2024 \u2014 European Parliament (per iecirknis)", "metadata": {"country": "Latvia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 999, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 999}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:10:10.531243", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.885, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.937, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.834, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.759, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.937, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.938, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.731, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.26, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.798, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.071, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1021", "name": "Latvia 2022 \u2014 14th Saeima (per iecirknis)", "metadata": {"country": "Latvia", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1055, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1055}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:10:06.437293", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 403, "n_distinct_geometry": 342, "quality_index": 3.885, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.937, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.829, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.74, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.937, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.938, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.731, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.791, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.638, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.798, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.087, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.087, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1020", "name": "Latvia 2019 \u2014 European Parliament (per iecirknis)", "metadata": {"country": "Latvia", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1000, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:10:03.765210", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 119, "n_distinct_geometry": 116, "quality_index": 3.885, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.932, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.826, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.741, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.938, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.519, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.502, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.741, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.717, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.118, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.118, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1019", "name": "Latvia 2018 \u2014 13th Saeima (per iecirknis)", "metadata": {"country": "Latvia", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1078, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1078}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:09:59.444106", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 598, "n_distinct_geometry": 607, "quality_index": 3.885, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.932, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.832, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.745, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.938, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.519, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.386, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.729, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.129, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.129, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1018", "name": "Kosovo 2025 (Feb) \u2014 National Assembly (per polling station)", "metadata": {"country": "Kosovo", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2533, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:09:51.625641", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2533, "n_distinct_geometry": 1151, "quality_index": 3.218, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.406, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.631, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.457, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.218, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.406, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.278, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.441, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.0, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.082, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.104, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.457, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.638, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.348, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.348, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1017", "name": "Kosovo 2021 \u2014 National Assembly (per polling station)", "metadata": {"country": "Kosovo", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2380, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:09:44.204571", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2380, "n_distinct_geometry": 1033, "quality_index": 3.537, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.509, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.674, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.494, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.537, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.509, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.275, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.068, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.1, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.674, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.494, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.494, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.484, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.484, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.656, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.282, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.282, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1016", "name": "Kosovo 2021 \u2014 Municipal Assemblies (per polling station)", "metadata": {"country": "Kosovo", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2477, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:08:39.627231", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2477, "n_distinct_geometry": 1007, "quality_index": 3.537, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.509, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.674, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.494, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.537, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.509, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.275, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.068, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.1, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.674, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.494, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.494, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.484, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.484, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.656, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.282, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.282, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1015", "name": "Kosovo 2019 \u2014 National Assembly (per polling station)", "metadata": {"country": "Kosovo", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2547, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:08:31.828084", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2547, "n_distinct_geometry": 1033, "quality_index": 3.56, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.566, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.677, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.497, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.566, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.558, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.367, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.592, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.982, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.158, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.716, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.497, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.497, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.472, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.472, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.671, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.318, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.813, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.813, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1014", "name": "Kosovo 2017 \u2014 National Assembly (per polling station)", "metadata": {"country": "Kosovo", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2488, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:08:24.320394", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2488, "n_distinct_geometry": 978, "quality_index": 3.64, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.272, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.574, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.399, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.64, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.272, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.622, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.715, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.679, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.147, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.473, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.574, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.399, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.399, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.406, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.406, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.613, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.613, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.392, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.78, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1013", "name": "Kosovo 2017 \u2014 Municipal Assemblies (per polling station)", "metadata": {"country": "Kosovo", "year": 2017, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2505, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:08:15.005920", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2505, "n_distinct_geometry": 1017, "quality_index": 3.64, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.272, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.574, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.399, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.64, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.272, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.622, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.715, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.679, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.147, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.473, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.574, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.399, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.399, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.406, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.406, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.613, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.613, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.392, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.78, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1012", "name": "Kosovo 2014 \u2014 National Assembly (per polling station)", "metadata": {"country": "Kosovo", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2372, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 33}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:08:07.313380", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2372, "n_distinct_geometry": 776, "quality_index": 3.717, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.157, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.593, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.414, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.157, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.421, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.116, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.548, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.593, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.593, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.414, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.414, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.397, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.397, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.539, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.539, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1011", "name": "Kosovo 2013 \u2014 Municipal Assemblies (per polling station)", "metadata": {"country": "Kosovo", "year": 2013, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2346, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:07:08.965773", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2346, "n_distinct_geometry": 672, "quality_index": 2.386, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.78, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.519, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.364, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.386, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.033, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.258, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.116, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.536, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.384, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.519, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.519, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.364, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.364, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.349, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.349, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.543, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1010", "name": "Honduras 2021 \u2014 Presidential (per JRV, SAGE / official CNE)", "metadata": {"country": "Honduras", "year": 2021, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18293, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 55, "turnout_100_pct": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 59, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:05:27.237057", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 18200, "n_distinct_geometry": 3630, "quality_index": 2.94, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.964, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.394, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.248, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.964, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.535, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.634, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.487, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.248, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.142, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.282, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.248, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.248, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.152, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.152, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.773, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.773, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.635, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.718, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.718, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1009", "name": "Honduras 2021 \u2014 Legislative / National Congress (per JRV, SAGE / official CNE)", "metadata": {"country": "Honduras", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18273, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 18273}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:03:23.066125", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 18200, "n_distinct_geometry": 3630, "quality_index": 2.94, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.964, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.394, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.248, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.964, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.535, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.634, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.487, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.248, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.142, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.282, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.248, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.248, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.152, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.152, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.773, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.773, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.635, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.718, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.718, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1008", "name": "El Salvador 2019 \u2014 Presidential (per JRV)", "metadata": {"country": "El Salvador", "year": 2019, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 9568, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 9568}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:02:57.162115", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.351, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.822, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.599, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.393, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.351, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.532, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.039, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.51, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.259, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.565, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.503, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.626, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.807, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.599, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.393, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.393, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.285, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.285, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.575, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.575, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.596, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.596, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.72, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.72, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1007", "name": "El Salvador 2014 \u2014 Presidential Round 2 runoff (per voting centre, SAGE) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "El Salvador", "year": 2014, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1591, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1591}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:02:50.880736", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 1591, "n_distinct_geometry": 833, "quality_index": 3.384, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.849, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.665, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.465, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.384, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.202, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.577, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.644, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.017, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.465, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.465, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.319, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.319, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.608, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.608, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Frente Farabundo Mart\u00ed para la Liberaci\u00f3n Nacional (FMLN)", "winner_candidate": "S. S\u00e1nchez Cer\u00e9n", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Alianza Republicana Nacionalista (ARENA)", "margin": 0.22, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SLV", "year": 2014, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1006", "name": "El Salvador 2014 \u2014 Presidential Round 1 (per voting centre, SAGE) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "El Salvador", "year": 2014, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1591, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1591}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T22:01:49.747876", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 1591, "n_distinct_geometry": 833, "quality_index": 3.384, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.849, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.665, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.465, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.384, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.849, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.202, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.577, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.644, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.017, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.465, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.465, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.319, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.319, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.608, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.608, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Frente Farabundo Mart\u00ed para la Liberaci\u00f3n Nacional (FMLN)", "winner_candidate": "S. S\u00e1nchez Cer\u00e9n", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Alianza Republicana Nacionalista (ARENA)", "margin": 0.22, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SLV", "year": 2014, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1005", "name": "Dominican Republic 2024 \u2014 Presidential (per colegio, SAGE) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominican Republic", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18495, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 18495, "outside_country": 1550}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T21:59:49.396250", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 16337, "n_distinct_geometry": 2554, "quality_index": 3.63, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.71, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.495, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.63, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.611, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.104, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.526, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.091, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.773, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.368, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.436, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.495, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.495, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.399, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.399, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.562, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.899, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1004", "name": "Dominican Republic 2020 \u2014 Presidential (per colegio, SAGE) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Dominican Republic", "year": 2020, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17274, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 174, "cast_exceeds_registered": 2, "outside_country": 1065}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-08-18T21:58:10.840046", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 15907, "n_distinct_geometry": 2573, "quality_index": 3.176, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.546, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.656, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.449, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.176, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.546, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.539, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.532, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.383, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.755, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.759, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.656, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.449, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.353, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.353, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.598, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1003", "name": "Bulgaria 2024 \u2014 National Assembly (2024-06-09) per polling section", "metadata": {"country": "Bulgaria", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12976, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 19, "cast_exceeds_registered": 7, "turnout_100_pct": 318}, "n_stations_flagged": 325, "created_at": "2026-08-18T21:56:39.129279", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12976, "n_distinct_geometry": 5912, "quality_index": 3.29, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.418, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.645, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.533, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.29, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.391, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.348, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.484, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.533, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.533, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.482, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.482, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1002", "name": "Bulgaria 2023 \u2014 National Assembly (2023-04-02) per polling section", "metadata": {"country": "Bulgaria", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12916, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 28, "cast_exceeds_registered": 11, "turnout_100_pct": 274}, "n_stations_flagged": 285, "created_at": "2026-08-18T21:55:08.288807", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12591, "n_distinct_geometry": 5049, "quality_index": 3.606, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.913, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.659, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.58, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.606, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.48, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.73, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.075, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.012, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.659, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.58, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.58, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.336, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.336, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1001", "name": "Bulgaria 2022 \u2014 National Assembly (2022-10-02) per polling section", "metadata": {"country": "Bulgaria", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12932, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6, "cast_exceeds_registered": 9, "turnout_100_pct": 246}, "n_stations_flagged": 255, "created_at": "2026-08-18T21:53:35.893661", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12098, "n_distinct_geometry": 5049, "quality_index": 3.67, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.679, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.602, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.67, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.788, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.364, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.73, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.012, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.679, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.679, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.602, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.544, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.301, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.301, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:1000", "name": "Bulgaria 2021 \u2014 National Assembly (2021-11-14) per polling section", "metadata": {"country": "Bulgaria", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13238, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 29, "cast_exceeds_registered": 8, "turnout_100_pct": 337}, "n_stations_flagged": 345, "created_at": "2026-08-18T21:52:45.243735", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12124, "n_distinct_geometry": 5049, "quality_index": 3.67, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.665, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.549, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.67, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.679, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.417, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.604, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.905, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.4, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.549, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.807, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:999", "name": "Bangladesh 2018 \u2014 Jatiya Sangsad (per polling station, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Bangladesh", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40149, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 565}, "n_stations_flagged": 565, "created_at": "2026-08-18T21:49:13.932988", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 39775, "n_distinct_geometry": 13228, "quality_index": 1.163, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 0.781, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.252, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.097, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.163, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.291, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.195, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.635, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.409, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.413, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.103, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.985, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.167, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.252, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.252, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.097, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.097, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.095, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.095, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.423, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.423, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.188, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.188, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.899, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.389, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.389, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:998", "name": "Austria 2024 \u2014 Nationalrat, full country per Gemeinde", "metadata": {"country": "Austria", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2270, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 155}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T21:49:06.480074", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.802, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.882, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.84, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.762, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.802, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.882, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.542, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.114, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:997", "name": "Austria 2019 \u2014 Nationalrat, full country per Gemeinde", "metadata": {"country": "Austria", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2273, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 155}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T21:49:02.030164", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.819, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.881, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.862, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.793, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.819, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.735, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.107, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.325, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.074, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.074, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:996", "name": "Armenia 2021 \u2014 National Assembly (party-list, per polling station)", "metadata": {"country": "Armenia", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "2,008 polling stations, 25 forces. Reconciles to certified national shares within 0.04pp: Civil Contract 53.96% (certified 53.92%), Armenia Alliance 21.10% (21.11%), I Have Honor 5.22% (5.22%). The ~0.05% shortfall vs certified totals is expected \u2014 the per-station tabulation excludes the small electronic vote and three annulled stations. No per-station coordinates in source (omitted).\n", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2008, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-08-18T21:48:57.865472", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.024, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.583, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.724, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.532, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.583, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.051, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.471, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.029, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.764, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.514, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.532, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.532, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.311, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.311, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:995", "name": "Armenia 2018 \u2014 National Assembly (party-list, per polling station)", "metadata": {"country": "Armenia", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "2,010 polling stations, 11 forces. Reconciles to certified national shares within 0.02pp: My Step Alliance 70.44% (certified 70.42%), Prosperous Armenia 8.27% (8.27%), Bright Armenia 6.37% (6.37%). The ~0.05% shortfall vs certified totals is expected \u2014 the per-station tabulation excludes the small electronic vote and three annulled stations. No per-station coordinates in source (omitted).\n", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2010, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 7}, "n_stations_flagged": 7, "created_at": "2026-08-18T21:47:59.384049", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.927, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.524, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.404, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.944, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.718, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.442, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.675, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.518, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.629, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.524, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.344, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.344, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:994", "name": "Armenia 2017 \u2014 National Assembly (party-list, per polling station)", "metadata": {"country": "Armenia", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "2,009 polling stations, 9 forces. Reconciles to certified national shares within 0.02pp: Republican Party 49.14% (certified 49.15%), Tsarukyan Alliance 27.36% (27.35%), Yelk 7.79% (7.78%), ARF 6.58% (6.58%). The ~0.05% shortfall vs certified totals is expected \u2014 the per-station tabulation excludes the small electronic vote and three annulled stations. No per-station coordinates in source (omitted).\n", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2009, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-08-18T21:47:55.626991", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.76, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.381, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.219, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.218, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.485, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.04, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.015, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.504, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.3, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.3, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.248, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.248, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.813, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.813, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.608, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.608, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:993", "name": "Armenia 2012 \u2014 National Assembly (proportional ballot, per polling station)", "metadata": {"country": "Armenia", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "1,982 polling stations, 9 forces (proportional ballot). Reconciles to certified national shares within 0.09pp: Republican Party 44.11% (certified 44.02%), Prosperous Armenia 30.19% (30.12%), ANC 7.10% (7.08%). The ~0.05% shortfall vs certified totals is expected \u2014 the per-station tabulation excludes the small electronic vote and three annulled stations. Only the proportional ballot is represented (mixed system). No per-station coordinates in source (omitted).\n", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1982, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 7}, "n_stations_flagged": 7, "created_at": "2026-08-18T21:47:51.012141", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.046, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.343, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.353, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.201, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.046, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.262, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.343, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.336, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.302, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.576, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.216, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.093, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.345, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.983, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.353, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.353, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.294, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.294, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.21, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.21, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "RPA", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Heritage", "margin": 22.44, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "ARM", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:992", "name": "Armenia 2003 Presidential R2 runoff (Hyde observer-effect replication) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Armenia", "year": 2003, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "academic_replication. cast=valid=votersR2; invalid=0 (deposit has no invalid-ballot column). Reconciles to CEC/OSCE R2 (Kocharyan 67.5%) within 0.06pp.", "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1764, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1, "cast_exceeds_registered": 28, "turnout_100_pct": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 32, "created_at": "2026-08-18T21:47:47.859626", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.054, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 0.608, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.349, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.186, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.054, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.264, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 0.608, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.152, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.162, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.311, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.078, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.212, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.664, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.416, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.349, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.349, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.186, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.292, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.703, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.238, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.238, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.584, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "People's Party of Armenia", "margin": 34.91, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "ARM", "year": 2003, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:991", "name": "Armenia 2003 Presidential R1 (Hyde observer-effect replication) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Armenia", "year": 2003, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "academic_replication. cast=valid=reported total; invalid=0 (deposit has no invalid-ballot column). Reconciles to CEC/OSCE R1 within 0.33pp.", "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1764, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1, "cast_exceeds_registered": 6, "turnout_100_pct": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-08-18T21:47:44.170378", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.054, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 0.608, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.349, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.186, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.054, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.264, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 0.608, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.152, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.162, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.311, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.078, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.212, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.664, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.416, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.349, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.349, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.186, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.186, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.292, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.703, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.238, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.238, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.584, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "People's Party of Armenia", "margin": 34.91, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "ARM", "year": 2003, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:990", "name": "Albania 2013 - Kuvendi (per precinct, regional closed-list PR)", "metadata": {"country": "Albania", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Tag: academic_replication (EFToolkit / Mebane-Kalinin). valid = sum of 66 party columns; cast = max(Ballots, valid); invalid = cast - valid; registered = Registered. station_id = <commune>_<precinct> with -k suffix on 60 collision pairs. No per-precinct coordinates (only commune/prefecture polygons ship with the toolkit).\n", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5508, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2, "turnout_100_pct": 63}, "n_stations_flagged": 63, "created_at": "2026-08-18T21:46:35.161269", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.147, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.523, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.433, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.147, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.297, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.324, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.061, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.515, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.48, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.523, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.523, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.433, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.433, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.38, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.38, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.72, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.72, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.758, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.758, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:989", "name": "Afghanistan 2018 \u2014 Wolesi Jirga (per polling station, SAGE)", "metadata": {"country": "Afghanistan", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "New race+cycle for AF (the corpus previously held Afghanistan presidential only). SNTV lower-house general seats. Academic transcription (Cookman IEC re-key) of scanned tally sheets -> tier4_independent_rekeyed.\n", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17715, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 17715}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T21:44:09.777341", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 17694, "n_distinct_geometry": 1514, "quality_index": 1.634, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.361, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.33, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.176, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.361, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.188, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.547, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.517, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.129, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.211, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.199, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.441, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.36, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.33, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.176, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.176, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.179, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.179, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.513, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.513, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.226, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.226, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.687, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:988", "name": "Latvia 2014 \u2014 12th Saeima (per iecirknis)", "metadata": {"country": "Latvia", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1054, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1054}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T21:40:33.509883", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.89, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.827, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.832, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.748, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.827, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.744, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.748, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.748, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.082, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.082, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:987", "name": "Mexico 2018 Senadores \u2014 recount/annulment audit (INE casanuladas)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 recount", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "recount"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 156808, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1051, "cast_exceeds_registered": 55, "turnout_100_pct": 9}, "n_stations_flagged": 64, "created_at": "2026-08-18T15:02:30.627015", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.702, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.958, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.675, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.452, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.702, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.162, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.547, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.452, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.372, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.652, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "National Regeneration Movemenr (MORENA)", "winner_candidate": "Andr\u00e9s Manuel L\u00f3pez Obrador", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "National Action Party (PAN)", "margin": 30.91, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MEX", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:986", "name": "Mexico 2018 Senadores (INE c\u00f3mputos, casilla)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 157891, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2308, "cast_exceeds_registered": 56, "turnout_100_pct": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 64, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:56:44.651046", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.702, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.958, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.675, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.452, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.702, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.162, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.547, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.857, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.452, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.372, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.652, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "National Regeneration Movemenr (MORENA)", "winner_candidate": "Andr\u00e9s Manuel L\u00f3pez Obrador", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "National Action Party (PAN)", "margin": 30.91, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MEX", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:985", "name": "Maldives 2023 \u2014 Presidential Round 2 / Runoff (per ballot box) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Maldives", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 586, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:56:39.023595", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.239, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.749, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.596, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.453, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.239, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.749, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.448, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.775, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.828, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.596, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.596, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.453, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.453, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.396, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.396, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.741, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.463, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.463, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:984", "name": "Maldives 2023 \u2014 Presidential Round 1 (per ballot box) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Maldives", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 574, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:56:37.209463", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.239, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.749, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.596, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.453, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.239, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.749, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.448, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.775, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.828, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.596, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.596, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.453, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.453, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.396, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.396, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.741, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.463, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.463, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:983", "name": "Malawi 2019 \u2014 Presidential MEC declared + Tipp-Ex edit coding (audit/version-diff companion) \u2014 mec_declared_audit", "metadata": {"country": "Malawi", "year": 2019, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "Annulment/version-diff companion to malawi_2019_presidential. Carries MEC declared figures + per-station result-sheet edit flags. result_status=annulled_by_court.\n", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "critical", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 audited", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "audited"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5002, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 1, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:56:18.073190", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.022, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 0.645, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.48, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.413, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.161, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.622, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.406, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.15, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.756, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.365, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.341, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.078, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.27, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.48, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.48, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.413, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.269, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.269, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.684, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.684, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:982", "name": "Malawi 2019 Parliamentary", "metadata": {"country": "Malawi", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3315, "granularity": "location", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 45}, "n_stations_flagged": 45, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:56:10.494801", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.022, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 0.645, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.48, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.413, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.161, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.622, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.406, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.15, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.756, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.365, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.341, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.078, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.27, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.48, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.48, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.413, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.269, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.269, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.684, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.684, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:981", "name": "Malawi 2019 Local Government", "metadata": {"country": "Malawi", "year": 2019, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3314, "granularity": "location", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 39, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 40, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:56:03.325266", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.022, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 0.645, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.48, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.413, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.161, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.622, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.406, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.15, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.756, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.365, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.341, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.078, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.27, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.48, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.48, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.413, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.269, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.269, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.684, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.684, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:980", "name": "Tamil Nadu 2026 Legislative Assembly (booth-wise Form 20)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2026, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "~71,294 booths across 220 ACs. valid=Total Valid Votes; invalid=Rejected; cast=valid+rejected+NOTA. 13 ACs excluded as OCR-garbage exports (no recoverable boundary): 151-159 (Tittakudi..Kattumannarkoil) and 179-183 (Viralimalai..Aranthangi).", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 71294, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 71294}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:51:10.148225", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.377, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.26, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.472, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.45, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.377, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.377, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.26, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.26, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.534, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.667, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.684, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.684, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.458, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.458, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:979", "name": "Tamil Nadu 2021 Legislative Assembly (booth-wise Form 20)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "~80,171 booths across 214 ACs. valid=Total Valid Votes (candidate sum, excl NOTA); invalid=Rejected; cast=valid+rejected+NOTA. 3 ACs excluded (OCR garbage, no recoverable boundary): 027-Shozhinganallur, 110-Coonoor, 228-Radhapuram.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 80171, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 80171}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:45:57.354152", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.398, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.307, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.137, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.398, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.398, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.307, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.307, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.234, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.234, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.687, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.466, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.466, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:978", "name": "India \u00b7 Sikkim 2024 \u2014 Electoral roll register by sex (per polling station) \u2014 electoral_roll_by_sex", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 574, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:45:48.564851", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.381, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.281, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.772, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.281, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.477, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:977", "name": "Hungary 2018 mp (party-list per-szavazokor)", "metadata": {"country": "Hungary", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 preliminary", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "preliminary"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10285, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:45:28.058094", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.404, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.426, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.481, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.373, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.404, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.601, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.426, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.25, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.204, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.441, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.182, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.481, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.344, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.344, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.72, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.72, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.468, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.468, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.584, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Fidesz", "winner_candidate": "Janos Ader", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 46.23, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "HUN", "year": 2017, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:976", "name": "Ghana 2012 \u2014 Presidential (CODEO observer per-polling-station sample) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Ghana", "year": 2012, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 parallel_count", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "parallel_count"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1994, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 66, "cast_exceeds_registered": 39, "turnout_100_pct": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 47, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:44:36.597235", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 666, "n_distinct_geometry": 774, "quality_index": 3.549, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.626, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.771, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.661, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.549, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.626, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.276, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.605, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.518, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.098, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.771, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.566, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.566, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.929, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "NDC", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "NPP", "margin": 2.99, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "GHA", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:975", "name": "Germany \u00b7 Thuringia 2024 \u2014 Landtag (per Wahlbezirk) \u2014 thuringia", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2998, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 488}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:44:30.389966", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.825, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.778, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.567, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:974", "name": "Georgia 2012 \u2014 Parliamentary, party-list (per precinct)", "metadata": {"country": "Georgia", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3696, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 4, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:44:22.323320", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.974, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.609, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.519, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.361, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.974, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.495, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.465, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.396, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.519, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.519, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.361, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.361, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.431, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.748, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.748, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.568, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.568, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.096, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.096, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Georgian Dream", "winner_candidate": "Giorgi MARGVELASHVILI", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "United National Movement", "margin": 40.38, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "GEO", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:973", "name": "Estonia 2019 Riigikogu (jaoskond)", "metadata": {"country": "Estonia", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 451, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:44:20.096553", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.873, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.948, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.898, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.848, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.517, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.629, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.031, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.031, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:972", "name": "Estonia 2019 European Parliament (Jaoskond)", "metadata": {"country": "Estonia", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 444, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:44:18.371577", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.873, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.948, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.898, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.848, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.517, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.629, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.031, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.031, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:971", "name": "Estonia KOV 2017 (VVK, jaoskond)", "metadata": {"country": "Estonia", "year": 2017, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 557, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:44:13.951475", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.909, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.952, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.907, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.861, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.952, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.42, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.907, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.907, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.816, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.027, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.027, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.971, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:970", "name": "Estonia 2015 Riigikogu (jaoskond)", "metadata": {"country": "Estonia", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 547, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:43:27.634867", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.909, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.952, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.894, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.845, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.952, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.569, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.42, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.894, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.795, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.027, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.027, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:969", "name": "Estonia 2014 European Parliament (Jaoskond)", "metadata": {"country": "Estonia", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 566, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 566}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:43:25.174559", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.908, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.888, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.838, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.944, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.632, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.569, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.888, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.788, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.027, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.027, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:968", "name": "Estonia KOV 2013 (VVK, jaoskond)", "metadata": {"country": "Estonia", "year": 2013, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 804, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 222}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:43:18.361010", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.908, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.883, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.834, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.944, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.632, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.569, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.834, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.788, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.027, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.027, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:967", "name": "Croatia 2020 \u2014 Sabor (per polling place)", "metadata": {"country": "Croatia", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6664, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1, "turnout_100_pct": 105}, "n_stations_flagged": 105, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:42:57.771662", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.66, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.942, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.756, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.647, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.66, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.398, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.432, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.386, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.647, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.6, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.293, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.293, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:966", "name": "Croatia 2016 \u2014 Sabor (per polling place)", "metadata": {"country": "Croatia", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6686, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8, "turnout_100_pct": 108}, "n_stations_flagged": 108, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:41:57.239611", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.866, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.942, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.765, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.651, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.685, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.124, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.169, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.542, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.651, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.608, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.608, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.325, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.325, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Croatian Democratic Union", "winner_candidate": "K. Grabar-Kitarovi\u0107", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 1.48, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "HRV", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:965", "name": "Croatia 2015 \u2014 Sabor (per polling place)", "metadata": {"country": "Croatia", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6687, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6, "turnout_100_pct": 111}, "n_stations_flagged": 111, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:41:40.596882", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.866, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.662, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.816, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.703, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.662, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.474, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.528, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.169, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.542, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.816, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.703, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.656, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.302, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.302, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Croatian Democratic Union", "winner_candidate": "K. Grabar-Kitarovi\u0107", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 1.48, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "HRV", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:964", "name": "Croatia 2011 \u2014 Sabor (per polling place)", "metadata": {"country": "Croatia", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6728, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 24, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:41:06.538654", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.798, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.946, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.853, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.744, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.798, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.947, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.426, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.744, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.939, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Social Democratic Party of Croatia", "winner_candidate": "I. Josipovi\u0107", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 20.52, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "HRV", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:963", "name": "Brazil 2022 Governor R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 92359, "granularity": "voting_site", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 1, "turnout_100_pct": 9}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:37:38.602646", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:962", "name": "Brazil 2020 Mayor R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2020, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 92539, "granularity": "voting_site", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 18}, "n_stations_flagged": 18, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:33:43.582441", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.51, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.659, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.534, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.51, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.659, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.632, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.246, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.672, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.534, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.397, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.397, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.682, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.537, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.709, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:961", "name": "Brazil 2018 Governor R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2018, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 91795, "granularity": "voting_site", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 233, "turnout_100_pct": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 241, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:29:33.235675", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.51, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.659, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.749, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.608, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.51, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.659, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.632, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.246, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.285, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.608, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.608, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.446, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.446, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.785, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:960", "name": "Brazil 2016 Mayor R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2016, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 93764, "granularity": "voting_site", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 87}, "n_stations_flagged": 87, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:25:13.556149", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.969, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.02, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.781, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.653, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.969, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.992, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.02, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.096, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.641, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.287, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.072, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.653, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.495, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.495, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.872, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.809, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:959", "name": "Brazil 2014 Governor R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2014, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 0, "granularity": "voting_site", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:24:51.593841", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.969, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.02, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.873, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.783, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.969, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.992, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.02, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.096, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.287, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.072, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.626, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.626, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "With the strength of the people", "winner_candidate": "Dilma Rouseff", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Change, Brazil", "margin": 3.28, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "BRA", "year": 2014, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:958", "name": "Brazil 2012 Mayor R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2012, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 92305, "granularity": "voting_site", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 86}, "n_stations_flagged": 86, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:20:55.019470", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.975, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.92, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.871, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.777, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.975, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.994, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.255, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.064, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.629, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.629, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.493, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.493, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:957", "name": "Brazil 2010 Governor R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2010, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 0, "granularity": "voting_site", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:20:33.837690", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.975, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.92, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.871, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.776, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.975, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.994, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.255, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.064, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.494, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.494, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "For Brazil to keep on changing", "winner_candidate": "Dilma Rouseff", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Brazil can do more", "margin": 12.11, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "BRA", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:956", "name": "Brazil 2008 Mayor R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2008, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 91154, "granularity": "voting_site", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 340}, "n_stations_flagged": 340, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:16:48.404389", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.933, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.916, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.866, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.96, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.255, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.064, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.62, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.62, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.494, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.494, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:955", "name": "Brazil 2006 Governor R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2006, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 87804, "granularity": "voting_site", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-08-18T14:12:42.693278", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.933, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.916, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.868, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.77, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.96, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.255, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.064, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.77, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.622, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.494, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.494, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Coalition the People's Power", "winner_candidate": "Luiz In\u00e1cio Lula da Silva", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Coalition for a decent Brazil", "margin": 21.65, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "BRA", "year": 2006, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:953", "name": "Romania 2020 \u2014 Senate (per section, upper house) \u2014 senate", "metadata": {"country": "Romania", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18274, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 763}, "n_stations_flagged": 763, "created_at": "2026-07-26T17:02:53.122026", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.451, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.896, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.805, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.676, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.451, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.125, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.6, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.676, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.601, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.601, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.347, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.347, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.911, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:952", "name": "Romania 2020 \u2014 Chamber of Deputies (per section)", "metadata": {"country": "Romania", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18274, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 763}, "n_stations_flagged": 763, "created_at": "2026-07-26T17:02:11.138121", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.451, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.896, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.805, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.676, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.451, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.125, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.6, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.676, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.601, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.601, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.347, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.347, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.911, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:950", "name": "South Africa 2024 \u2014 Regional-to-National compensatory ballot (per voting district)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 23291, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 47, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 48, "created_at": "2026-07-26T16:55:20.550291", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.695, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.351, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.734, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.648, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.695, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.351, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.046, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.391, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.648, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.517, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:949", "name": "South Africa 2024 \u2014 Provincial Legislatures (per voting district)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 23291, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 46, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 47, "created_at": "2026-07-26T16:53:43.183545", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.695, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.351, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.734, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.648, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.695, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.351, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.046, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.391, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.648, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.517, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:948", "name": "South Africa 2019 \u2014 Provincial Legislatures (per voting district)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 23050, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 145, "cast_exceeds_registered": 468, "turnout_100_pct": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 471, "created_at": "2026-07-26T16:52:07.279376", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.378, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.389, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.727, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.623, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.378, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.389, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.472, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.575, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.644, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.623, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.489, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.489, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.461, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.461, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:947", "name": "South Africa 2014 \u2014 Provincial Legislatures (per voting district)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 22262, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 914, "turnout_100_pct": 27}, "n_stations_flagged": 941, "created_at": "2026-07-26T16:50:41.386080", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.673, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.765, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.758, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.641, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.439, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.507, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.449, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.299, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.575, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.758, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.758, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.524, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.481, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.877, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:946", "name": "South Africa 2009 \u2014 Provincial Legislatures (per voting district)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19725, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 1450, "turnout_100_pct": 23}, "n_stations_flagged": 1473, "created_at": "2026-07-26T16:49:21.403683", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.715, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.787, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.775, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.656, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.715, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.405, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.394, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.607, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.48, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.278, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.656, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.53, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.53, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.475, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.475, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:945", "name": "South Africa 2004 \u2014 Provincial Legislatures (per voting district)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 16963, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 988, "turnout_100_pct": 27}, "n_stations_flagged": 1015, "created_at": "2026-07-26T16:48:07.980805", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.794, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.9, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.764, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.649, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.794, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.9, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.347, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.174, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.607, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.48, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.26, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.565, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.764, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.649, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.514, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.514, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.416, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.416, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:944", "name": "South Africa 1999 \u2014 Provincial Legislatures (per voting district)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 1999, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14525, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2, "cast_exceeds_registered": 1556, "turnout_100_pct": 41}, "n_stations_flagged": 1597, "created_at": "2026-07-26T16:46:59.307995", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.785, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.903, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.709, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.598, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.785, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.356, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.131, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.533, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.607, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.282, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.709, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.598, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.475, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.475, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:943", "name": "South Africa 2014 \u2014 National Assembly (per voting district)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 22263, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 1180, "turnout_100_pct": 23}, "n_stations_flagged": 1203, "created_at": "2026-07-26T16:45:36.035957", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.673, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.765, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.758, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.641, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.439, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.507, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.449, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.299, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.575, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.758, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.758, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.524, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.481, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.877, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:942", "name": "South Africa 2009 \u2014 National Assembly (per voting district)", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19734, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 9, "cast_exceeds_registered": 1723, "turnout_100_pct": 22}, "n_stations_flagged": 1745, "created_at": "2026-07-26T16:44:39.721183", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.715, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.787, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.775, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.656, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.715, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.405, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.394, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.607, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.48, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.278, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.656, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.53, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.53, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.475, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.475, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:941", "name": "Indonesia 2014 presidential (per-TPS)", "metadata": {"country": "Indonesia", "year": 2014, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 478828, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 478828}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-07T11:00:36.482274", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.689, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.419, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.658, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.512, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.689, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.419, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.77, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.32, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.593, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.27, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.568, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.658, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.424, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P)", "winner_candidate": "Joko Widodo", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Great Indonesia Movement Party (GERINDRA)", "margin": 6.3, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "IDN", "year": 2014, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:940", "name": "Turkey 2011 parliamentary (per-sandik)", "metadata": {"country": "Turkey", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 199659, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 21, "cast_exceeds_registered": 3459, "turnout_100_pct": 1547}, "n_stations_flagged": 5006, "created_at": "2026-07-07T10:54:38.224281", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.521, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.937, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.522, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.354, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.521, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.937, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.19, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.465, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.613, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.377, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.522, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.522, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.354, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.354, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.387, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.387, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.647, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.702, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.666, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.536, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.536, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:939", "name": "Mexico 2000 Senadores (per-casilla)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2000, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 114139, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 114139}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-07T10:48:33.239767", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.577, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.955, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.671, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.481, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.577, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.955, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.587, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.63, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.657, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.521, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.151, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.671, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.481, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.344, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.344, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.55, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional (PAN)", "winner_candidate": "Vincete Fox", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Partido Revolucionario Institucional  (PRI)", "margin": 6.55, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MEX", "year": 2000, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:938", "name": "Mexico 1994 presidential (per-casilla)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 1994, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 96415, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 96415}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-07T10:39:02.930164", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.721, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.266, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.467, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.26, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.721, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.48, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.463, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.366, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.652, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.26, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.26, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.227, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.227, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.521, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.679, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.679, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.671, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Partido Revolucionario Institucional  (PRI)", "winner_candidate": "Ernesto Zedillo Ponce de L\u00e9on", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional (PAN)", "margin": 23.44, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MEX", "year": 1994, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:931", "name": "NYC 2025 General Election \u2014 Mayor (by ED) \u2014 general", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2025, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4117, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 23, "turnout_100_pct": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 25, "created_at": "2026-07-06T19:52:52.928114", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 4032, "n_distinct_geometry": 4005, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.735, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.571, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.584, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.336, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.735, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.571, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.472, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.472, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.729, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:930", "name": "NYC 2024 General Election \u2014 President (by ED) \u2014 nyc_ed", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4187, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 3, "turnout_100_pct": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 9, "created_at": "2026-07-06T19:52:27.891794", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 4057, "n_distinct_geometry": 4109, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:929", "name": "Us 2024 president", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 181224, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 181224}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-06T19:42:41.380718", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:928", "name": "France 2022 mp R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 69680, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-06T19:39:49.817290", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.846, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.918, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.875, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.807, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.625, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.406, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.807, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.045, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.045, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:927", "name": "France 2017 mp R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 69241, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-06T19:36:37.425880", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.928, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.886, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.817, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.901, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.441, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.053, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.053, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:926", "name": "Paraguay 2023 president", "metadata": {"country": "Paraguay", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12233, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 15, "turnout_100_pct": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 20, "created_at": "2026-07-06T19:35:37.448686", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 10784, "n_distinct_geometry": 15, "quality_index": 2.933, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.183, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.576, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.42, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.183, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.656, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.414, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.0, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.348, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.337, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.576, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.576, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.42, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.42, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.24, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.24, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.739, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:923", "name": "Malawi 2019 Presidential (annulled by ConCourt 2020-02-03)", "metadata": {"country": "Malawi", "year": 2019, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4015, "granularity": "location", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 56, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 57, "created_at": "2026-07-06T19:34:24.027522", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.022, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 0.645, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.48, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.413, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.161, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.622, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.406, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.15, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.756, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.365, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.341, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.078, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.27, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.48, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.48, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.413, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.269, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.269, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.684, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.684, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:922", "name": "India 2019 Lok Sabha (national, booth-level)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 161619, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 22597, "cast_exceeds_registered": 31, "turnout_100_pct": 25}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-06T19:26:17.533476", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 126295, "n_distinct_geometry": 51927, "quality_index": 2.913, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.513, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.43, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.324, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.656, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.664, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.639, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.43, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.43, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.324, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.324, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.563, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.527, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:921", "name": "India 2014 Lok Sabha (national, booth-level)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 521265, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 10995, "cast_exceeds_registered": 1502, "turnout_100_pct": 28}, "n_stations_flagged": 1530, "created_at": "2026-07-06T18:56:28.919415", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 382968, "n_distinct_geometry": 286231, "quality_index": 3.604, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.56, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.617, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.488, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.604, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.069, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.658, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.275, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.617, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.617, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.488, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.818, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.576, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.576, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:920", "name": "India 2009 Lok Sabha (national, booth-level)", "metadata": {"country": "India", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 476741, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 89181, "cast_exceeds_registered": 1624, "turnout_100_pct": 12}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-06T18:21:21.846509", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 350404, "n_distinct_geometry": 249852, "quality_index": 3.646, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.666, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.683, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.539, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.201, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.683, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.683, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.539, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.539, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.731, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.731, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:918", "name": "Sweden 2014 Riksdag (Valmyndigheten official)", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6224, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 390}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T22:26:21.780521", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 5837, "n_distinct_geometry": 4991, "quality_index": 3.903, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.928, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.915, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.885, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.817, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.56, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.037, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.509, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.858, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.975, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:917", "name": "Sweden 2010 Riksdag (Valmyndigheten official)", "metadata": {"country": "Sweden", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6063, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 395}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T22:25:46.148796", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 5668, "n_distinct_geometry": 4999, "quality_index": 3.909, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.93, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.914, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.881, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.911, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.235, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.004, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.004, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:916", "name": "Brazil 2022 Presidente R2 (TSE direct, se\u00e7\u00e3o level) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 472028, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-07-05T21:59:01.350010", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 471008, "n_distinct_geometry": 58472, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:915", "name": "Brazil 2022 Presidente R1 (TSE direct, se\u00e7\u00e3o level) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 472028, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 9}, "n_stations_flagged": 9, "created_at": "2026-07-05T21:31:47.822066", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 471008, "n_distinct_geometry": 58472, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:914", "name": "Brazil 2022 Presidente R2 (MedeirosLD/TSE) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 92361, "granularity": "location", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 92361}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T21:24:39.104403", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 92359, "n_distinct_geometry": 58472, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:913", "name": "Brazil 2022 Presidente R1 (MedeirosLD/TSE) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 92361, "granularity": "location", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 92361}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T21:17:51.492296", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 92359, "n_distinct_geometry": 58472, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:912", "name": "Brazil 2018 Presidente R2 (MedeirosLD/TSE) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2018, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 93580, "granularity": "location", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 93580}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T21:11:01.557639", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 92914, "n_distinct_geometry": 61461, "quality_index": 3.51, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.659, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.749, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.608, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.51, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.659, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.632, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.246, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.285, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.608, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.608, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.446, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.446, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.785, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:911", "name": "Brazil 2018 Presidente R1 (MedeirosLD/TSE) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2018, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 93580, "granularity": "location", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 93580}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T21:04:02.878575", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 92914, "n_distinct_geometry": 61461, "quality_index": 3.51, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.659, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.749, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.608, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.51, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.659, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.632, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.246, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.285, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.608, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.608, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.446, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.446, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.785, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:910", "name": "Brazil 2014 Presidente R2 (MedeirosLD/TSE) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2014, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 94192, "granularity": "location", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 94192}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:57:02.318110", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 93437, "n_distinct_geometry": 63643, "quality_index": 3.969, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.02, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.873, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.783, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.969, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.992, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.02, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.096, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.287, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.072, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.626, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.626, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "With the strength of the people", "winner_candidate": "Dilma Rouseff", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Change, Brazil", "margin": 3.28, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "BRA", "year": 2014, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:909", "name": "Brazil 2014 Presidente R1 (MedeirosLD/TSE) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2014, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 94194, "granularity": "location", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 94194}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:50:00.185827", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 93439, "n_distinct_geometry": 63643, "quality_index": 3.969, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.02, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.873, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.783, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.969, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.992, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.02, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.096, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.287, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.072, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.626, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.626, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.506, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "With the strength of the people", "winner_candidate": "Dilma Rouseff", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Change, Brazil", "margin": 3.28, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "BRA", "year": 2014, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:908", "name": "Brazil 2010 Presidente R2 (MedeirosLD/TSE) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2010, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 92675, "granularity": "location", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 92675}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:43:10.355171", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 91250, "n_distinct_geometry": 70144, "quality_index": 3.975, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.92, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.871, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.776, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.975, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.994, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.255, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.064, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.494, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.494, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "For Brazil to keep on changing", "winner_candidate": "Dilma Rouseff", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Brazil can do more", "margin": 12.11, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "BRA", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:907", "name": "Brazil 2010 Presidente R1 (MedeirosLD/TSE) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2010, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 92675, "granularity": "location", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 92675}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:36:22.724655", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 91250, "n_distinct_geometry": 70144, "quality_index": 3.975, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.92, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.871, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.776, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.975, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.994, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.255, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.064, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.494, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.494, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "For Brazil to keep on changing", "winner_candidate": "Dilma Rouseff", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Brazil can do more", "margin": 12.11, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "BRA", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:906", "name": "Brazil 2006 Presidente R2 (MedeirosLD/TSE) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2006, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 89005, "granularity": "location", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 89005}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:29:47.473142", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 88301, "n_distinct_geometry": 65054, "quality_index": 3.933, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.916, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.868, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.77, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.96, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.255, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.064, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.77, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.622, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.494, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.494, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Coalition the People's Power", "winner_candidate": "Luiz In\u00e1cio Lula da Silva", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Coalition for a decent Brazil", "margin": 21.65, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "BRA", "year": 2006, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:905", "name": "Brazil 2006 Presidente R1 (MedeirosLD/TSE) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2006, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 89006, "granularity": "location", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 89006}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:22:53.514634", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 88302, "n_distinct_geometry": 65054, "quality_index": 3.933, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.916, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.868, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.77, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.96, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.255, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.064, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.77, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.622, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.494, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.494, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Coalition the People's Power", "winner_candidate": "Luiz In\u00e1cio Lula da Silva", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Coalition for a decent Brazil", "margin": 21.65, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "BRA", "year": 2006, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:904", "name": "Czech Kv2022", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 16988, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:21:51.484082", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.818, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.874, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.854, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.784, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.874, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.63, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.657, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.158, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.158, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:903", "name": "Czech Kv2018", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2018, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17405, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:20:55.474016", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.234, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.916, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.81, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.708, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.541, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.57, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.719, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.2, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.2, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.903, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "SPO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "TOP 09", "margin": 2.74, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "CZE", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:902", "name": "Czech Kv2014", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2014, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17282, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:19:51.593975", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.856, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.9, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.852, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.766, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.9, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.228, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.228, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.916, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "SPOZ", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "TOP 09", "margin": 9.6, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "CZE", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:901", "name": "Czech Kv2010", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2010, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17291, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 5, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:18:39.556734", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.859, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.904, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.883, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.805, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.859, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.96, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.49, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:900", "name": "Czech Kv2006", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2006, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17442, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:17:43.309776", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.86, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.901, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.821, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.901, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.962, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.49, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.258, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.258, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.977, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:899", "name": "Czech Kv2002", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2002, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17006, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 10, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:16:39.630102", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.786, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.884, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.808, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.839, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.044, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.511, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.258, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.258, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.975, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:898", "name": "Czech Kz2024", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13591, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:15:17.000737", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12395, "n_distinct_geometry": 4247, "quality_index": 3.865, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.865, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.811, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.872, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.095, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.095, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:897", "name": "Czech Kz2016", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13660, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:13:52.499611", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12423, "n_distinct_geometry": 4247, "quality_index": 3.856, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.9, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.852, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.763, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.9, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.222, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.222, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.916, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:896", "name": "Czech Kz2012", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13670, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:12:28.341172", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12762, "n_distinct_geometry": 4247, "quality_index": 3.859, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.904, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.891, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.814, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.859, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.96, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.49, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.234, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.234, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "SPOZ", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "TOP 09", "margin": 9.6, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "CZE", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:895", "name": "Czech Kz2008", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13659, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:11:15.266826", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12748, "n_distinct_geometry": 4247, "quality_index": 3.86, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.901, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.897, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.821, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.901, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.962, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.49, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.903, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.258, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.258, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:894", "name": "Czech Kz2004", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13653, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:10:03.009189", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12738, "n_distinct_geometry": 4200, "quality_index": 3.786, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.892, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.815, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.839, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.044, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.511, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.258, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.258, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.977, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:893", "name": "Czech Kz2000", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2000, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 13677, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1, "turnout_100_pct": 9}, "n_stations_flagged": 9, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:08:50.218169", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12755, "n_distinct_geometry": 4200, "quality_index": 3.791, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.895, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.878, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.801, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.791, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.839, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.034, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.508, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.878, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.79, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.79, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.258, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.258, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.976, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:892", "name": "Czech 2025 Sn\u011bmovn\u00ed (volby.cz)", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14819, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 7}, "n_stations_flagged": 7, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:07:37.321583", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12396, "n_distinct_geometry": 4247, "quality_index": 3.793, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.849, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.794, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.793, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.869, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.33, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.171, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.171, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:891", "name": "Czech 2021 Sn\u011bmovn\u00ed (volby.cz)", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14886, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 18}, "n_stations_flagged": 18, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:06:23.691948", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12423, "n_distinct_geometry": 4247, "quality_index": 3.818, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.874, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.789, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.698, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.874, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.63, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.657, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.698, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.698, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.164, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.164, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:890", "name": "Czech 2017 Sn\u011bmovn\u00ed (volby.cz)", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14865, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 13}, "n_stations_flagged": 13, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:05:11.987145", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12423, "n_distinct_geometry": 4247, "quality_index": 3.612, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.632, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.726, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.612, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.632, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.323, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.57, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.643, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.503, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.626, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.21, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.21, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "SPO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "TOP 09", "margin": 2.74, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "CZE", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:889", "name": "Czech 2013 Sn\u011bmovn\u00ed (volby.cz)", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14873, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 14}, "n_stations_flagged": 14, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:04:00.363174", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12765, "n_distinct_geometry": 4247, "quality_index": 3.856, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.92, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.863, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.779, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.194, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.785, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.238, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.238, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.935, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "SPOZ", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "TOP 09", "margin": 9.6, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "CZE", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:888", "name": "Czech 2010 Sn\u011bmovn\u00ed (volby.cz)", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14894, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 14}, "n_stations_flagged": 14, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:02:48.555813", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12753, "n_distinct_geometry": 4247, "quality_index": 3.859, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.904, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.883, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.805, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.859, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.96, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.49, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:887", "name": "Czech 2006 Sn\u011bmovn\u00ed (volby.cz)", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14866, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 26}, "n_stations_flagged": 26, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:01:36.199523", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12736, "n_distinct_geometry": 4200, "quality_index": 3.86, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.901, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.821, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.901, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.962, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.49, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.258, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.258, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.977, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:886", "name": "Czech 2002 Sn\u011bmovn\u00ed (volby.cz)", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14868, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2, "turnout_100_pct": 66}, "n_stations_flagged": 66, "created_at": "2026-07-05T20:00:24.719471", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12738, "n_distinct_geometry": 4200, "quality_index": 3.786, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.884, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.808, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.839, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.044, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.511, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.884, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.258, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.258, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.975, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:885", "name": "Czech 2024 European Parliament", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14714, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:59:12.181050", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12395, "n_distinct_geometry": 4247, "quality_index": 3.865, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.865, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.811, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.872, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.095, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.095, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:884", "name": "Czech 2019 European Parliament", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14766, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:58:23.210795", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12424, "n_distinct_geometry": 4247, "quality_index": 3.234, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.916, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.8, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.699, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.541, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.18, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.707, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.707, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.939, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.225, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.225, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "SPO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "TOP 09", "margin": 2.74, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "CZE", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:883", "name": "Czech 2014 European Parliament", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14777, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:57:12.170350", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12566, "n_distinct_geometry": 4247, "quality_index": 3.856, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.9, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.852, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.766, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.9, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.228, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.228, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.916, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "SPOZ", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "TOP 09", "margin": 9.6, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "CZE", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:882", "name": "Czech 2009 European Parliament", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14777, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:55:59.834854", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12750, "n_distinct_geometry": 4247, "quality_index": 3.86, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.901, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.888, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.813, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.901, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.962, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.49, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.888, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.813, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.813, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.268, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.268, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:881", "name": "Czech 2004 European Parliament", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14763, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:55:11.976161", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 12737, "n_distinct_geometry": 4200, "quality_index": 3.786, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.892, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.815, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.839, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.044, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.511, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.258, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.258, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.977, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:876", "name": "Greenland 2021 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Greenland", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:49:04.736643", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:875", "name": "Greenland 2018 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Greenland", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:48:59.049263", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:873", "name": "Greenland 2014 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Greenland", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:47:52.678057", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:872", "name": "Greenland 2013 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Greenland", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:47:46.481885", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:870", "name": "Greenland 2009 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Greenland", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:46:40.623974", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:869", "name": "Greenland 2005 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Greenland", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:46:36.881501", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:867", "name": "Greenland 2002 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Greenland", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:45:28.550654", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:866", "name": "Greenland 1999 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Greenland", "year": 1999, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:45:24.316199", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:864", "name": "Greenland 1995 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Greenland", "year": 1995, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:44:16.414825", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:863", "name": "Greenland 1991 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Greenland", "year": 1991, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:44:12.780309", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:861", "name": "Greenland 1987 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Greenland", "year": 1987, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:43:04.264091", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:860", "name": "Greenland 1984 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Greenland", "year": 1984, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:42:57.102403", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:858", "name": "Greenland 1983 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Greenland", "year": 1983, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:41:52.174306", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:857", "name": "Greenland 1979 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Greenland", "year": 1979, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-07-05T19:41:49.141272", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": null, "electoral_democracy_source": null, "liberal_democracy_index": null, "liberal_democracy_source": null, "vdem_indicators": {}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:840", "name": "Mexico 2000 Presidential", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2000, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 113424, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 113424}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T14:44:18.328838", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.577, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.955, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.671, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.481, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.577, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.955, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.587, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.63, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.657, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.521, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.151, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.671, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.481, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.344, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.344, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.55, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional (PAN)", "winner_candidate": "Vincete Fox", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Partido Revolucionario Institucional  (PRI)", "margin": 6.55, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MEX", "year": 2000, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:838", "name": "Poland 2007 Sejm", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 25476, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 34}, "n_stations_flagged": 34, "created_at": "2026-06-25T14:41:08.397445", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.917, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.911, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.874, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.803, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.911, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.762, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.398, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.774, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.083, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.083, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:837", "name": "Afghanistan 2019 Presidential (Cookman/IEC, gender)", "metadata": {"country": "Afghanistan", "year": 2019, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 25075, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 40, "turnout_100_pct": 12}, "n_stations_flagged": 52, "created_at": "2026-06-25T11:24:21.595635", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 18778, "n_distinct_geometry": 3163, "quality_index": 1.728, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.152, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.329, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.162, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.728, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.432, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.055, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.514, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.005, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.251, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.236, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.155, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.329, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.329, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.162, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.162, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.175, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.175, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.487, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.487, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.211, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.211, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.674, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:836", "name": "Mexico 2025 \u2014 Voter register by sex (Padr\u00f3n / Lista Nominal, per secci\u00f3n) \u2014 voter_register_by_sex", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 71539, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 1688}, "n_stations_flagged": 1688, "created_at": "2026-06-25T11:11:48.306211", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.469, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.221, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.195, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.469, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.221, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.221, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.265, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.265, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.626, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.626, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.265, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.265, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.574, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.619, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:835", "name": "Afghanistan 2009 Presidential R1 (Cookman/IEC + ECC audit)", "metadata": {"country": "Afghanistan", "year": 2009, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "critical", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19870, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 19870}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-25T11:04:59.796871", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 17331, "n_distinct_geometry": 4584, "quality_index": 1.769, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.39, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.361, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.196, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.769, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.222, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.458, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.115, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.274, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.339, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.289, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.322, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.361, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.361, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.196, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.196, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.204, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.255, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.255, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent - Hamid Karzai", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent (CCH)", "margin": 21.04, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "AFG", "year": 2009, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:834", "name": "Uruguay 2024 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Uruguay", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7340, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 118}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-06T20:09:33.211676", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 7340, "n_distinct_geometry": 18, "quality_index": 3.862, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.768, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.862, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.183, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.546, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.681, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.681, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.913, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:832", "name": "Philippines 2022 president", "metadata": {"country": "Philippines", "year": 2022, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 105613, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 7}, "n_stations_flagged": 7, "created_at": "2026-06-06T11:15:59.533414", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 92152, "n_distinct_geometry": 75, "quality_index": 2.172, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.781, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.411, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.277, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.172, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.384, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.596, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.058, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.265, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.602, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.558, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.39, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.512, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.411, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.411, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.277, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.277, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.178, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.178, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.529, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.657, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.657, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:831", "name": "Colombia 2022 president R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2022, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 103364, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 103364, "cast_exceeds_registered": 489, "turnout_100_pct": 26}, "n_stations_flagged": 515, "created_at": "2026-06-06T11:08:31.970859", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 88277, "n_distinct_geometry": 1227, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.696, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.561, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.696, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.561, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.426, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.426, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.383, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.383, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:830", "name": "Colombia 2022 president R2 (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2022, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 103363, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 103363, "cast_exceeds_registered": 708, "turnout_100_pct": 24}, "n_stations_flagged": 732, "created_at": "2026-06-06T11:01:19.542642", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 88277, "n_distinct_geometry": 1227, "quality_index": 3.724, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.684, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.696, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.561, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.724, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.684, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.552, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.696, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.561, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.426, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.426, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.383, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.383, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:829", "name": "Colombia 2018 president R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2018, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 97650, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 97650, "cast_exceeds_registered": 304, "turnout_100_pct": 17}, "n_stations_flagged": 321, "created_at": "2026-06-06T10:54:13.269332", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.744, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.93, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.666, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.533, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.744, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.647, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.794, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.336, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.558, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.635, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.666, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.533, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.533, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Democratic Center (CD)", "winner_candidate": "Iv\u00e1n Duque M\u00e1rquez", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Progressive Movement (MP)", "margin": 12.79, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "COL", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:828", "name": "Colombia 2018 president R2 (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Colombia", "year": 2018, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 97644, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 97644, "cast_exceeds_registered": 331, "turnout_100_pct": 24}, "n_stations_flagged": 355, "created_at": "2026-06-06T04:32:02.398129", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.744, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.93, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.666, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.533, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.744, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.647, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.794, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.336, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.558, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.635, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.666, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.533, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.533, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Democratic Center (CD)", "winner_candidate": "Iv\u00e1n Duque M\u00e1rquez", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Progressive Movement (MP)", "margin": 12.79, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "COL", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:827", "name": "Netherlands 2023 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Netherlands", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10042, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-06-06T04:27:50.327274", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 9982, "n_distinct_geometry": 7678, "quality_index": 3.826, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.917, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.847, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.791, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.826, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.568, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.642, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.791, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.019, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.019, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:826", "name": "Liberia 2014 Senate R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Liberia", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4701, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 4701, "cast_exceeds_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-06-06T04:25:56.162857", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 4585, "n_distinct_geometry": 16, "quality_index": 2.931, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.386, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.611, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.45, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.386, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.341, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.605, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.651, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.338, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.585, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.401, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.611, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.611, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.45, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.45, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.393, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.393, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.58, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.58, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:825", "name": "Liberia 2011 Presidential R2 (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Liberia", "year": 2011, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4455, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 4455, "cast_exceeds_registered": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-06-06T04:23:01.122703", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 4350, "n_distinct_geometry": 16, "quality_index": 2.931, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.386, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.646, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.487, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.386, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.341, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.553, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.862, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.401, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.487, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.487, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "UP", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "CDC", "margin": 81.43, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "LBR", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:824", "name": "Liberia 2011 Presidential R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Liberia", "year": 2011, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4457, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 4457, "cast_exceeds_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-06-06T04:22:11.352912", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 4352, "n_distinct_geometry": 16, "quality_index": 2.931, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.386, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.646, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.487, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.386, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.341, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.553, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.862, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.401, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.487, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.487, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "UP", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "CDC", "margin": 81.43, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "LBR", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:823", "name": "Liberia 2011 House R1", "metadata": {"country": "Liberia", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4457, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 4457}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-06T04:20:38.555854", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 4352, "n_distinct_geometry": 16, "quality_index": 2.931, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.386, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.646, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.487, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.386, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.341, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.553, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.862, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.401, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.487, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.487, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "UP", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "CDC", "margin": 81.43, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "LBR", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:822", "name": "Liberia 2011 Senate R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Liberia", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4457, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 4457}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-06T04:16:54.021780", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 4352, "n_distinct_geometry": 16, "quality_index": 2.931, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.386, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.646, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.487, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.386, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.341, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.553, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.862, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.401, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.487, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.487, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "UP", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "CDC", "margin": 81.43, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "LBR", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:820", "name": "Indonesia 2024 president", "metadata": {"country": "Indonesia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 518145, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 9473, "cast_exceeds_registered": 9185, "turnout_100_pct": 5555}, "n_stations_flagged": 14740, "created_at": "2026-06-05T17:26:38.966958", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 514009, "n_distinct_geometry": 378, "quality_index": 2.768, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.522, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.332, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.522, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.738, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.464, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.117, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.529, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.301, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.067, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.332, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.332, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.3, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.3, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.7, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.741, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:817", "name": "NYC 2025 Democratic Mayoral Primary \u2014 first choice by ED (RCV) \u2014 dem_primary_rcv", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2025, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4036, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 41, "turnout_100_pct": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 43, "created_at": "2026-06-05T16:01:27.331626", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3991, "n_distinct_geometry": 3963, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.735, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.571, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.584, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.336, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.735, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.571, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.472, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.472, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.729, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:815", "name": "NYC 2021 General Election \u2014 Mayor (by ED) \u2014 general", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5725, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T16:00:54.485982", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.754, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.681, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.821, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.756, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.681, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.429, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.6, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.068, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.068, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:814", "name": "Canada 2011 (House, by party)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 71463, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 5014, "cast_exceeds_registered": 149, "turnout_100_pct": 17}, "n_stations_flagged": 166, "created_at": "2026-06-05T15:41:38.599517", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.59, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.811, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.74, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.623, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.747, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.687, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.676, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:813", "name": "Canada 2008 (House, by party)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 69557, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 4348, "cast_exceeds_registered": 163, "turnout_100_pct": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 173, "created_at": "2026-06-05T15:38:45.914743", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.873, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.945, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.827, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.753, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.893, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.302, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.74, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.753, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.753, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.703, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.033, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.033, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:812", "name": "Canada 2006 (House, by party)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 66089, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 3678, "cast_exceeds_registered": 371, "turnout_100_pct": 18}, "n_stations_flagged": 389, "created_at": "2026-06-05T15:36:13.303373", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.941, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.83, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.757, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.401, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.745, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.035, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:811", "name": "Canada 2004 (House, by party)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 64235, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 3550, "cast_exceeds_registered": 147, "turnout_100_pct": 12}, "n_stations_flagged": 159, "created_at": "2026-06-05T15:33:38.947706", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.755, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.888, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.825, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.755, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.596, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.678, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.702, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.035, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:810", "name": "Czech 2023 Presidential \u2014 Round 2 (by candidate) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14857, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 19}, "n_stations_flagged": 19, "created_at": "2026-06-05T15:32:51.962025", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.865, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.863, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.796, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.872, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.132, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.132, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:809", "name": "Czech 2023 Presidential \u2014 Round 1 (by candidate) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14857, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 19}, "n_stations_flagged": 19, "created_at": "2026-06-05T15:32:11.367353", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.865, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.863, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.796, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.872, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.132, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.132, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:808", "name": "Czech 2013 Presidential \u2014 Round 2 (by candidate) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2013, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14903, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-06-05T15:31:23.267422", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.856, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.92, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.863, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.779, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.194, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.785, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.238, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.238, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.935, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "SPOZ", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "TOP 09", "margin": 9.6, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "CZE", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:807", "name": "Czech 2013 Presidential \u2014 Round 1 (by candidate) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2013, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14903, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-06-05T15:30:40.172031", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.856, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.92, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.863, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.779, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.194, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.785, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.238, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.238, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.935, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "SPOZ", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "TOP 09", "margin": 9.6, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "CZE", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:802", "name": "Nigeria 2023 Presidential Complete", "metadata": {"country": "Nigeria", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 154782, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 22925, "cast_exceeds_registered": 408, "turnout_100_pct": 865}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-05T05:55:40.586997", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 140563, "n_distinct_geometry": 1673, "quality_index": 2.108, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.659, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.484, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.316, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.108, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.659, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.365, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.995, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.514, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.383, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.808, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.484, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.484, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.28, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.28, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.666, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.415, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:801", "name": "Australia 2025 (House first prefs, by party)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8913, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8913}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-04T23:21:27.331740", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 8331, "n_distinct_geometry": 7368, "quality_index": 3.804, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.844, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.793, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.802, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.15, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.537, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.726, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.029, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.029, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:800", "name": "Australia 2022 (House first prefs, by party)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8451, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8451}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-04T23:20:09.196629", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 8387, "n_distinct_geometry": 6945, "quality_index": 3.841, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.794, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.067, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.919, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.988, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.033, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.033, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:799", "name": "Australia 2019 (House first prefs, by party)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8736, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8736}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-04T23:18:49.540657", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 8202, "n_distinct_geometry": 7529, "quality_index": 3.649, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.93, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.825, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.779, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.649, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.19, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.019, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.033, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.033, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.887, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:798", "name": "Australia 2016 (House first prefs, by party)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8192, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8192}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-04T23:17:32.410088", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 7669, "n_distinct_geometry": 8286, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.937, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.871, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.833, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.937, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.876, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.07, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.987, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.038, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.038, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:797", "name": "Australia 2013 (House first prefs, by party)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8960, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8960}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-04T23:16:11.916015", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 8474, "n_distinct_geometry": 8060, "quality_index": 3.909, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.727, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.862, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.821, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.727, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.479, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.592, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.114, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.528, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.862, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.983, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.04, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.04, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:796", "name": "Australia 2010 (House first prefs, by party)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8774, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8774}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-04T23:14:53.064484", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 8276, "n_distinct_geometry": 8700, "quality_index": 3.905, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.947, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.896, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.856, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.905, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.947, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.722, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.963, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.108, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.991, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.035, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:795", "name": "Australia 2007 (House first prefs, by party)", "metadata": {"country": "Australia", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8218, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 8218}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-04T23:13:20.609071", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 7722, "n_distinct_geometry": 8245, "quality_index": 3.87, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.941, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.88, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.839, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.924, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.726, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.801, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.08, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.52, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.785, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.99, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.035, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:791", "name": "Nigeria 2023 president", "metadata": {"country": "Nigeria", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 115958, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 123}, "n_stations_flagged": 123, "created_at": "2026-06-04T21:17:21.282745", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 106283, "n_distinct_geometry": 1630, "quality_index": 2.108, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.659, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.484, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.316, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.108, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.659, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.365, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.995, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.514, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.383, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.808, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.484, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.484, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.28, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.28, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.666, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.415, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:790", "name": "Germany 2024 \u2014 Saxony Landtag \u2014 saxony", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4540, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1100}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-04T12:50:21.904520", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.825, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.778, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.567, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:789", "name": "Germany 2024 \u2014 Brandenburg Landtag \u2014 brandenburg", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3925, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 687}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-04T12:50:11.379047", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.825, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.778, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.567, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:783", "name": "San Francisco 2024 Mayor (RCV) \u2014 first choice by precinct \u2014 sf_general_rcv", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 510, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 510}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-03T07:23:43.261578", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.918, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.751, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.447, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.438, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.61, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.902, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.051, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.051, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:782", "name": "Maine 2018 U.S. House District 2 (RCV) \u2014 first choice by town \u2014 me02_ushouse_rcv", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2018, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 427, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 427}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-03T07:01:25.100389", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.382, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.914, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.824, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.739, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.382, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.7, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.527, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.274, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.495, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.407, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.739, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.635, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.935, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.097, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.097, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.903, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:777", "name": "Alaska 2022 U.S. House Special General (RCV) \u2014 first choice by precinct \u2014 ushouse_special_general_rcv", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 511, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 511}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-06-03T06:35:08.311159", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.91, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.035, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.833, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.769, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.035, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.683, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.397, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.599, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.606, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.606, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:776", "name": "Russia 2011 State Duma (\u0423\u0418\u041a-level, geocoded)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 81840, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 28410, "turnout_100_pct": 2210}, "n_stations_flagged": 30620, "created_at": "2026-05-31T20:57:06.063928", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 81840, "n_distinct_geometry": 80438, "quality_index": 1.737, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.331, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.299, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.134, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.737, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.434, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.331, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.583, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.205, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.608, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.152, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.313, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.451, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.108, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.277, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.299, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.299, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.134, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.225, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.225, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.125, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.125, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.429, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "United Russia", "winner_candidate": "Vladimir Putin", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Communist Party of the Russian Federation", "margin": 46.42, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "RUS", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:775", "name": "Russia 2021 State Duma (\u0423\u0418\u041a-level, PR)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 96302, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 2146}, "n_stations_flagged": 2146, "created_at": "2026-05-31T20:46:35.787795", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 85794, "n_distinct_geometry": 94, "quality_index": 1.482, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.616, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.245, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.094, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.482, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.616, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.654, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.566, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.039, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.26, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.112, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.286, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.01, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.253, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.245, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.245, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.094, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.094, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.188, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.188, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.424, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.701, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.271, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.271, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:774", "name": "Us 2020 Presidential", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2020, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 153388, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 153388}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-28T19:00:29.984847", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 122994, "n_distinct_geometry": 130614, "quality_index": 3.754, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.681, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.815, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.734, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.681, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.14, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.473, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.429, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.734, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.734, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.625, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.917, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.928, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.085, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.085, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.901, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:773", "name": "Us 2016 Presidential", "metadata": {"country": "United States", "year": 2016, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 181988, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 181988}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-28T17:42:01.423988", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 178273, "n_distinct_geometry": 2709, "quality_index": 3.259, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.885, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.83, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.259, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.594, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.898, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.554, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.495, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.456, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.068, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.068, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": null, "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": null, "margin": 14.13, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "USA", "year": 2016, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:772", "name": "Norway 2013 Sa", "metadata": {"country": "Norway", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-28T17:41:23.826527", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 7, "n_distinct_geometry": 7, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.897, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.863, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.443, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.052, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.513, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.971, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.006, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.006, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.979, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:766", "name": "Iceland 2018 Sveitarstjorn", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 2018, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 56, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 56}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-28T17:13:02.630790", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.824, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.919, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.875, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.793, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.837, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.7, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.702, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.366, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.592, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.012, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.012, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:765", "name": "Iceland 2014 Sveitarstjorn", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 2014, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 56, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 56}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-28T17:12:48.465288", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.835, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.926, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.856, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.773, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.366, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.592, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.773, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.773, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.012, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.012, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.921, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.921, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:764", "name": "Iceland 2010 Sveitarstjorn", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 2010, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 58, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 58}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-28T17:12:35.402544", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.834, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.925, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.881, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.799, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.834, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.925, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.352, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.013, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.013, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:763", "name": "Iceland 2006 Sveitarstjorn", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 2006, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 60, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 60}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-28T17:12:23.500082", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.754, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.877, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.865, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.781, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.754, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.874, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.725, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.308, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.013, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.013, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:762", "name": "Iceland 2002 Sveitarstjorn", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 2002, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 69, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 69}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-28T17:09:15.344449", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.874, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.868, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.78, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.874, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.327, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.78, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.797, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.013, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.013, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:757", "name": "France 2024 Legislatives R2", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 61615, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2, "turnout_100_pct": 13}, "n_stations_flagged": 13, "created_at": "2026-05-28T16:42:33.132727", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 60049, "n_distinct_geometry": 55698, "quality_index": 3.83, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.903, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.864, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.8, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.759, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.5, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.375, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.049, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.049, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:755", "name": "France 2015 Regionales R2", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 67776, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 67776}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-28T15:42:23.351187", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 63449, "n_distinct_geometry": 62408, "quality_index": 3.895, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.883, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.812, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.961, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.694, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.452, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.053, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.053, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:753", "name": "France 2012 Presidentielle", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2012, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 67932, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 62}, "n_stations_flagged": 62, "created_at": "2026-05-28T14:52:48.300787", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 61595, "n_distinct_geometry": 62408, "quality_index": 3.895, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.89, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.82, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.961, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.694, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.861, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.452, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.363, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.059, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.059, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "SP", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "UMP", "margin": 3.27, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "FRA", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:752", "name": "Czech Se2024 R2 (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4154, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-28T14:47:26.940621", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3619, "n_distinct_geometry": 1337, "quality_index": 3.865, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.865, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.811, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.872, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.095, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.095, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:751", "name": "Czech Se2022 R2 (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4434, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-28T14:46:12.473873", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3669, "n_distinct_geometry": 1831, "quality_index": 3.818, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.874, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.854, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.784, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.874, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.63, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.657, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.158, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.158, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:750", "name": "Czech Se2020 R2 (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5008, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2, "turnout_100_pct": 28}, "n_stations_flagged": 28, "created_at": "2026-05-28T14:41:48.786615", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 4268, "n_distinct_geometry": 1633, "quality_index": 3.234, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.916, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.806, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.709, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.541, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.709, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.716, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.217, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.217, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:741", "name": "Bolivia 2019 Presidential Annulled", "metadata": {"country": "Bolivia", "year": 2019, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 34555, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 280}, "n_stations_flagged": 280, "created_at": "2026-05-28T13:22:32.474196", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 33048, "n_distinct_geometry": 10, "quality_index": 1.952, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 0.9, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.456, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.241, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.952, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.488, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.225, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.091, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.773, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.486, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.368, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.342, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.389, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.883, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.471, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.241, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.241, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.294, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.294, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.701, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.289, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.668, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:740", "name": "Argentina 2023 Paso Parlamento Mercosur Regional", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 104532, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 14}, "n_stations_flagged": 14, "created_at": "2026-05-28T12:34:21.420148", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 104052, "n_distinct_geometry": 3906, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:738", "name": "Argentina 2023 Paso Concejal", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 988, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-05-28T11:47:53.781381", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 988, "n_distinct_geometry": 109, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:737", "name": "Argentina 2015 Paso Parlamentarios Mercosur Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 94236, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 3, "turnout_100_pct": 39}, "n_stations_flagged": 42, "created_at": "2026-05-28T11:39:23.290484", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 93797, "n_distinct_geometry": 3980, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.765, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.59, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Cambiemos", "winner_candidate": "M. Macri", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Frente para la Victoria (FplV)", "margin": 2.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:735", "name": "Nz 2020 mp", "metadata": {"country": "New Zealand", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 9867, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 9867}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-27T10:20:20.040253", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 6302, "n_distinct_geometry": 3449, "quality_index": 3.863, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.933, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.826, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.777, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.742, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.475, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.009, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.009, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:733", "name": "Turkiye 2023 president (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Turkey", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 195817, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 3603, "cast_exceeds_registered": 3157, "turnout_100_pct": 947, "outside_country": 3455}, "n_stations_flagged": 4104, "created_at": "2026-05-26T06:44:51.821019", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 182981, "n_distinct_geometry": 72, "quality_index": 2.462, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.85, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.285, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.108, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.462, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.474, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.747, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.366, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.342, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.995, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.222, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.285, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.285, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.108, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.108, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.193, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.388, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.178, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.178, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.177, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.177, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:732", "name": "Turkiye 2023 president", "metadata": {"country": "Turkey", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 191129, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 3775, "turnout_100_pct": 1112}, "n_stations_flagged": 4887, "created_at": "2026-05-25T14:07:48.219926", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 181896, "n_distinct_geometry": 72, "quality_index": 2.462, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.85, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.285, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.108, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.462, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.474, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.747, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.366, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.342, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.995, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.222, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.285, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.285, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.108, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.108, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.193, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.388, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.388, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.178, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.178, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.177, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.177, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:730", "name": "South Africa 2019 National Election", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 23031, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 125, "cast_exceeds_registered": 639, "turnout_100_pct": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 644, "created_at": "2026-05-25T13:32:50.458238", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 21856, "n_distinct_geometry": 19202, "quality_index": 3.378, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.389, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.727, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.623, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.378, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.389, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.472, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.575, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.644, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.623, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.489, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.489, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.461, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.461, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:729", "name": "South Africa 2004 National Election", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 16972, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 9, "cast_exceeds_registered": 1234, "turnout_100_pct": 36}, "n_stations_flagged": 1270, "created_at": "2026-05-25T13:31:37.097021", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 16718, "n_distinct_geometry": 16024, "quality_index": 3.794, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.9, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.764, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.649, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.794, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.9, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.347, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.174, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.607, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.48, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.26, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.565, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.764, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.649, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.514, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.514, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.416, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.416, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:728", "name": "South Africa 1999 National Election", "metadata": {"country": "South Africa", "year": 1999, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "critical", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14525, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2, "cast_exceeds_registered": 1661, "turnout_100_pct": 39}, "n_stations_flagged": 1700, "created_at": "2026-05-25T13:18:40.617723", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 13733, "n_distinct_geometry": 14348, "quality_index": 3.785, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.903, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.709, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.598, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.785, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.356, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.131, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.533, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.607, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.282, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.709, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.598, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.475, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.475, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.859, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.395, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:727", "name": "Italy 2022 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Italy", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7842, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-25T05:56:48.467749", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 7559, "n_distinct_geometry": 6321, "quality_index": 3.908, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.956, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.842, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.763, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.956, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.589, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.446, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.862, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.924, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.134, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:726", "name": "Ukraine 2019 Rada \u2014 Rada SMD rank-buckets", "metadata": {"country": "Ukraine", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "critical", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 199, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-24T10:41:07.073376", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.505, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.73, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.528, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.318, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.505, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.206, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.332, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.583, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.675, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.528, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.528, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.318, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.366, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.366, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.292, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:725", "name": "Ukraine 2019 Presidential \u2014 POLLING-STATION Round 2 (Zelensky landslide) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Ukraine", "year": 2019, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "critical", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 29980, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 331}, "n_stations_flagged": 331, "created_at": "2026-05-24T10:39:22.949707", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.505, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.73, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.528, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.318, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.505, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.206, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.332, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.583, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.675, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.528, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.528, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.318, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.366, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.366, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.292, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:723", "name": "Ukraine 2019 Presidential \u2014 POLLING-STATION Round 1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Ukraine", "year": 2019, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "critical", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 29989, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 332}, "n_stations_flagged": 332, "created_at": "2026-05-24T10:37:27.219081", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.505, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.73, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.528, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.318, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.505, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.206, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.332, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.583, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.655, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.675, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.528, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.528, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.318, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.318, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.366, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.366, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.292, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.762, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:721", "name": "Ukraine 2014 Presidential \u2014 POLLING-STATION (Poroshenko) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Ukraine", "year": 2014, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "critical", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 29202, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1, "turnout_100_pct": 254}, "n_stations_flagged": 254, "created_at": "2026-05-24T10:35:33.903753", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.301, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.985, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.417, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.215, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.301, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.575, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.985, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.451, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.723, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.417, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.417, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.215, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.215, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.293, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.293, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.149, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.149, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:719", "name": "Ukraine 2010 Presidential \u2014 POLLING-STATION Round 2 (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Ukraine", "year": 2010, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "critical", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 33667, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 486}, "n_stations_flagged": 486, "created_at": "2026-05-24T10:33:38.456309", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.69, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.049, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.484, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.264, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.69, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.049, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.036, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.458, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.353, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.338, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.971, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.484, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.484, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.264, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.264, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.33, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.211, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.211, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.719, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Party of Regions", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "All-Ukrainian Union \"Fatherland\"", "margin": 3.48, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "UKR", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:717", "name": "Ukraine 2010 Presidential \u2014 POLLING-STATION Round 1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Ukraine", "year": 2010, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "critical", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 33227, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 374}, "n_stations_flagged": 374, "created_at": "2026-05-24T10:31:42.194305", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.69, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.049, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.484, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.264, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.69, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.672, "year": 2010, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.049, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.036, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.458, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.353, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.338, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.971, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.601, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.484, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.484, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.264, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.264, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.33, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.33, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.211, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.211, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.883, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.719, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Party of Regions", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "All-Ukrainian Union \"Fatherland\"", "margin": 3.48, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "UKR", "year": 2010, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:715", "name": "Ukraine 2004 Presidential \u2014 POLLING-STATION Round 3 (legit re-run) (round 3)", "metadata": {"country": "Ukraine", "year": 2004, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 3, "stakes_level": "critical", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 33182, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 5, "cast_exceeds_registered": 2, "turnout_100_pct": 476}, "n_stations_flagged": 478, "created_at": "2026-05-24T10:28:43.561065", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.815, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.479, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.383, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.271, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.479, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.198, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.298, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.074, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.548, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.137, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.348, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.41, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.352, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.383, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.383, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.271, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.271, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.298, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.298, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.386, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.386, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.584, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Independent - Viktor Yushchenko", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Party of Regions", "margin": 7.91, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "UKR", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:713", "name": "Ukraine 2004 Presidential \u2014 Round 2 (ANNULLED by Supreme Court) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Ukraine", "year": 2004, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "critical", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 223, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 223}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-24T10:28:38.311566", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.815, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.479, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.383, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.271, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.479, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.198, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.298, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.074, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.548, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.137, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.348, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.41, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.352, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.383, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.383, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.271, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.271, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.298, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.298, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.386, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.386, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.584, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Independent - Viktor Yushchenko", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Party of Regions", "margin": 7.91, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "UKR", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:712", "name": "Ukraine 2004 Presidential \u2014 Round 1 (Yushchenko vs Yanukovych) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Ukraine", "year": 2004, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "critical", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 222, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 222}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-24T10:28:36.808457", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.815, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.479, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.383, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.271, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.479, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.37, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.198, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.298, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.074, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.548, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.137, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.348, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.41, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.352, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.383, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.383, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.271, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.271, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.298, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.298, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.733, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.386, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.386, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.584, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.584, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Independent - Viktor Yushchenko", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Party of Regions", "margin": 7.91, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "UKR", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:711", "name": "Ukraine 1999 Presidential \u2014 Round 2 (Kuchma 56.3% re-election) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Ukraine", "year": 1999, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "critical", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 225, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-24T10:28:35.877097", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.626, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.543, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.422, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.245, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.626, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.406, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.543, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.113, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.278, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.426, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.356, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.045, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.234, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.422, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.245, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.245, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.307, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.307, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.702, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.296, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.296, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.69, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.69, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Accord", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "KPU", "margin": 18.92, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "UKR", "year": 1999, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:710", "name": "Ukraine 1999 Presidential \u2014 Round 1 (Kuchma 36.5%) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Ukraine", "year": 1999, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "critical", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 225, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-24T10:28:33.754835", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.626, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.543, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.422, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.245, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.626, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.406, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.543, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.113, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.278, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.426, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.356, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.045, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.234, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.422, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.422, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.245, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.245, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.307, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.307, "year": 1999, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.702, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 1999, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.296, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.296, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 1999, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.69, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.69, "year": 1999, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Accord", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "KPU", "margin": 18.92, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "UKR", "year": 1999, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:688", "name": "Germany 2025 BTW", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 95111, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 28703}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-24T00:17:12.770339", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 95111, "n_distinct_geometry": 16, "quality_index": 3.846, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.462, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.828, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.782, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.462, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.746, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.233, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.558, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.024, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.024, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:685", "name": "Germany 2021 BTW", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 96300, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 29693, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-20T21:50:52.060660", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 94668, "n_distinct_geometry": 16, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.863, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.814, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.214, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.863, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.814, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.016, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.956, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:684", "name": "Germany 2017 BTW", "metadata": {"country": "Germany", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 88510, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 16634, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-20T21:31:57.406654", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 88510, "n_distinct_geometry": 16, "quality_index": 3.881, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.95, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.889, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.842, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.881, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.779, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.412, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.012, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.012, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:681", "name": "Pakistan 2024 mp \u2014 form45_v2", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14119, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 14119}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-15T05:36:32.001227", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.168, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.339, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.313, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.193, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.168, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.339, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.631, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.436, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.109, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.462, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.223, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.406, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.313, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.313, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.193, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.114, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.586, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.586, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.818, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.559, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:675", "name": "Mexico 2015 (Diputados)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: INE (Instituto Nacional Electoral) casilla-level published results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 148833, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T20:20:29.215773", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 5672, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.467, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.655, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.643, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.433, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.467, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.655, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.985, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.589, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.254, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.836, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.643, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.643, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.433, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.433, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.329, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.329, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.69, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.69, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.7, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.7, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:674", "name": "Mexico 2012 (Presidential)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2012, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: INE (Instituto Nacional Electoral) casilla-level published results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 143437, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T20:20:21.328883", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 5366, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.336, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.825, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.65, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.457, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.336, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.315, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.243, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.65, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.457, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.336, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.336, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.688, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.663, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.663, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.791, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI)", "winner_candidate": "Enrique Pena Nieto", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Partido Revolucionario Democratico (PRD)", "margin": 6.78, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MEX", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:673", "name": "Mexico 2012 (Diputados)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: INE (Instituto Nacional Electoral) casilla-level published results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 142230, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T20:20:10.807768", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 4464, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.336, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.825, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.65, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.457, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.336, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.825, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.315, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.553, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.243, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.65, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.457, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.336, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.336, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.688, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.663, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.663, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.791, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI)", "winner_candidate": "Enrique Pena Nieto", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Partido Revolucionario Democratico (PRD)", "margin": 6.78, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MEX", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:672", "name": "Mexico 2009 (Diputados)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: INE (Instituto Nacional Electoral) casilla-level published results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 138403, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T20:20:03.420857", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 3997, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.481, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.626, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.65, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.459, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.481, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.626, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.387, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.498, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.377, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.441, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.65, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.691, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.609, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:671", "name": "Mexico 2006 (Presidential)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2006, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: INE (Instituto Nacional Electoral) casilla-level published results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 130788, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T20:19:56.327070", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 4207, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.292, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.259, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.674, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.478, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.292, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.259, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.565, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.379, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.159, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.151, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.681, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.42, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.674, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.478, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.478, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.346, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.346, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.685, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.609, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional (PAN)", "winner_candidate": "Felipe Calder\u00f3n", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Alianza por el Bien de Todos (PRD/PT/PC)", "margin": 0.6, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MEX", "year": 2006, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:670", "name": "Mexico 2006 (Diputados)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: INE (Instituto Nacional Electoral) casilla-level published results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 129666, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T20:19:50.086498", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 3385, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.292, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.259, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.674, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.478, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.292, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.259, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.565, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.379, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.159, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.151, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.681, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.42, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.674, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.674, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.478, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.478, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.346, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.346, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.685, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.685, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.609, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2006, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional (PAN)", "winner_candidate": "Felipe Calder\u00f3n", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Alianza por el Bien de Todos (PRD/PT/PC)", "margin": 0.6, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MEX", "year": 2006, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:669", "name": "Mexico 2003 (Diputados)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2003, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: INE (Instituto Nacional Electoral) casilla-level published results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 120589, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T20:19:43.523956", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 3045, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.582, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.702, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.499, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.012, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.753, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.252, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.813, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.157, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.539, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.702, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.499, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.499, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.359, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.359, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.611, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.611, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2003, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:668", "name": "Mexico 2000 (Diputados)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2000, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: INE (Instituto Nacional Electoral) casilla-level published results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 112707, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T20:19:37.963324", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 2840, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.577, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.955, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.671, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.481, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.577, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.955, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.587, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.63, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.657, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.521, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.151, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.671, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.481, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.344, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.344, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.55, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional (PAN)", "winner_candidate": "Vincete Fox", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Partido Revolucionario Institucional  (PRI)", "margin": 6.55, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MEX", "year": 2000, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:667", "name": "Mexico 1997 (Diputados)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 1997, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: INE (Instituto Nacional Electoral) casilla-level published results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 104716, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T20:19:32.731630", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 2195, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.348, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.761, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.555, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.346, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.348, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.761, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.488, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.872, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.636, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.521, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.474, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.555, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.346, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.346, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.275, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.275, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.669, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.643, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.643, "year": 1997, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.684, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.684, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:665", "name": "Argentina 2023 General \u2014 Parlamento Mercosur \u2014 Lista Nacional \u2014 [general] Parlamento Mercosur \u2014 Lista Nacional", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 104520, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T20:19:17.832415", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:664", "name": "Argentina 2023 General \u2014 Presidente \u2014 [general] Presidente", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 104520, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T20:19:12.774669", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 104040, "n_distinct_geometry": 3906, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:663", "name": "Argentina 2017 PASO \u2014 Diputados Nacionales \u2014 [paso] Diputados Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 99687, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T20:18:51.226667", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.926, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.953, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.751, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.609, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.77, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.084, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.375, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.037, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.609, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.577, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.411, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.411, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:662", "name": "Argentina 2021 PASO \u2014 Diputados Nacionales \u2014 [paso] Diputados Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 99428, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T20:18:33.439879", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.934, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.94, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.796, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.639, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.621, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:661", "name": "Russia 2018 (Presidential)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 2018, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: Centralnaya izbiratel'naya komissiya (cikrf.ru) UIK-level results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 97699, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T20:18:26.433075", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.947, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.597, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.264, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.107, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.947, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.487, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.016, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.254, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.027, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.257, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.337, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.834, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.074, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.269, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.264, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.264, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.107, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.107, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.201, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.201, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.466, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.466, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.065, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.305, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.305, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "All-Russia People's Front (ONF)", "winner_candidate": "Vladimir Putin", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Communist Party of the Russian Federation", "margin": 64.92, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "RUS", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:660", "name": "Russia 2016 (Duma)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: Centralnaya izbiratel'naya komissiya (cikrf.ru) UIK-level results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 96871, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T20:18:17.990207", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.891, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.6, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.263, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.106, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.473, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.6, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.19, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.547, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.256, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.965, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.241, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.576, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.057, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.264, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.263, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.263, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.106, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.106, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.204, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.466, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.466, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.077, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.077, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.716, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.306, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:659", "name": "Russia 2020 (Constitution referendum)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 2020, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: Centralnaya izbiratel'naya komissiya (cikrf.ru) UIK-level results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 96765, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T20:18:12.701000", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.947, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.597, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.255, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.097, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.947, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.487, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.597, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.016, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.254, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.181, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.256, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.814, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.074, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.269, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.255, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.255, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.097, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.097, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.194, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.194, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.423, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.423, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.06, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.719, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.288, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:658", "name": "Russia 2008 (Presidential)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 2008, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: Centralnaya izbiratel'naya komissiya (cikrf.ru) UIK-level results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 96612, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T20:18:07.877682", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.103, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.701, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.302, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.139, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.103, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.526, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.701, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.297, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.125, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.354, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.339, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.459, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.103, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.302, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.302, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.139, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.139, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.228, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.228, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.543, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.162, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.162, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.731, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.731, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.433, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.433, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "United Russia", "winner_candidate": "Dmitry Medvedev", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Communist Party of the Russian Federation", "margin": 53.2, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "RUS", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:656", "name": "Russia 2007 (Duma)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 2007, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: Centralnaya izbiratel'naya komissiya (cikrf.ru) UIK-level results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 96193, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T20:17:50.002535", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.074, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.632, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.316, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.146, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.074, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.518, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.632, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.658, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.25, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.23, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.354, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.339, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.459, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.103, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.146, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.146, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.237, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.237, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.159, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.159, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.444, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.444, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "United Russia", "winner_candidate": "Dmitry Medvedev", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Communist Party of the Russian Federation", "margin": 53.2, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "RUS", "year": 2008, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:655", "name": "Russia 2004 (Presidential)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 2004, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: Centralnaya izbiratel'naya komissiya (cikrf.ru) UIK-level results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 95779, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T20:17:43.109108", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.343, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.098, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.321, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.153, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.343, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.586, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.098, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.485, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.46, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.365, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.431, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.105, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.321, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.321, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.153, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.153, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.239, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.239, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.561, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.561, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.159, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.159, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.458, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.458, "year": 2004, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent, supported by United Russia", "winner_candidate": "Vladimir Putin", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Communist Party of the Russian Federation", "margin": 58.11, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "RUS", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:654", "name": "Russia 2012 (Presidential)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 2012, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: Centralnaya izbiratel'naya komissiya (cikrf.ru) UIK-level results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 95415, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T20:17:36.688515", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.032, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.499, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.278, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.122, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.032, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.508, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.499, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.625, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.034, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.259, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.226, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.451, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.863, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.108, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.277, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.278, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.278, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.122, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.122, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.216, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.216, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.107, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.107, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.381, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.381, "year": 2012, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "United Russia", "winner_candidate": "Vladimir Putin", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Communist Party of the Russian Federation", "margin": 46.42, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "RUS", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:652", "name": "Russia 2003 (Duma)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 2003, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: Centralnaya izbiratel'naya komissiya (cikrf.ru) UIK-level results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 95205, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T20:17:14.930569", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.255, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.55, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.339, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.165, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.255, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.564, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.55, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.637, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.587, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.647, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.46, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.365, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.431, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.105, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.339, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.339, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.165, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.165, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.564, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.564, "year": 2003, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.159, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.159, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2003, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.478, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.478, "year": 2003, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent, supported by United Russia", "winner_candidate": "Vladimir Putin", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Communist Party of the Russian Federation", "margin": 58.11, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "RUS", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:651", "name": "Russia 2024 (Presidential)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: Centralnaya izbiratel'naya komissiya (cikrf.ru) UIK-level results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 91946, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T20:17:09.278745", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 82603, "n_distinct_geometry": 94, "quality_index": 1.008, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.593, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.171, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.057, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.008, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.252, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.593, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.648, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 0.656, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.164, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.127, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.262, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.066, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.253, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.563, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.233, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.171, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.171, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.057, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.057, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.129, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.129, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.26, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.26, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.046, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.046, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.795, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.08, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.08, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:650", "name": "Russia 2000 (Presidential)", "metadata": {"country": "Russia", "year": 2000, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: Centralnaya izbiratel'naya komissiya (cikrf.ru) UIK-level results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 91333, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T20:17:02.516753", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.555, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.096, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.403, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.223, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.555, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.096, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.774, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.751, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.688, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.493, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.862, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.466, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.431, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.858, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.182, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.403, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 2000, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.223, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.223, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.283, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.283, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.631, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.224, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.787, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.602, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.602, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "Vladimir Putin", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Communist Party of the Russian Federation", "margin": 23.9, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "RUS", "year": 2000, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:648", "name": "Argentina 2019 PASO \u2014 Diputados Nacionales \u2014 [paso] Diputados Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 98834, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T18:59:26.456798", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.915, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.779, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.618, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.998, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.053, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.083, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:646", "name": "Argentina 2019 General \u2014 Presidente \u2014 [general] Presidente", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2019, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 97282, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T18:13:38.056400", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 91471, "n_distinct_geometry": 509, "quality_index": 3.915, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.779, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.618, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.998, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.053, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.083, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:645", "name": "Mexico 1994 (Diputados)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 1994, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: INE (Instituto Nacional Electoral) casilla-level published results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 95738, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T16:33:35.733522", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 1631, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.721, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.266, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.467, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.26, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.721, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.266, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 1994, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.48, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.463, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.366, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.652, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.26, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.26, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.227, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.227, "year": 1994, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.521, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.679, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.679, "year": 1994, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.671, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.671, "year": 1994, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Partido Revolucionario Institucional  (PRI)", "winner_candidate": "Ernesto Zedillo Ponce de L\u00e9on", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Partido Acci\u00f3n Nacional (PAN)", "margin": 23.44, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "MEX", "year": 1994, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:641", "name": "Argentina 2015 General \u2014 Parlamento Mercosur \u2014 Lista Nacional \u2014 [general] Parlamento Mercosur \u2014 Lista Nacional", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 93655, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T14:53:54.392638", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.765, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.59, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Cambiemos", "winner_candidate": "M. Macri", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Frente para la Victoria (FplV)", "margin": 2.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:639", "name": "Brazil 2022 (Senator)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: TSE (cdn.tse.jus.br) Boletim de Urna ZIP exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 92359, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T14:26:50.210588", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 1, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.699, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.54, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.4, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.67, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.704, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:636", "name": "Argentina 2013 PASO \u2014 Diputados Nacionales \u2014 [paso] Diputados Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 91571, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T13:37:17.933976", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.953, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.772, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.588, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.742, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.145, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.036, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:634", "name": "Brazil 2024 (Municipal, Mayor)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: TSE (cdn.tse.jus.br) Boletim de Urna ZIP exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 89145, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T12:59:30.412733", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 9878, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.571, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.551, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.712, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.795, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.917, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.996, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.712, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.569, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.569, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.438, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.438, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:632", "name": "Brazil 2006 (Senator)", "metadata": {"country": "Brazil", "year": 2006, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: TSE (cdn.tse.jus.br) Boletim de Urna ZIP exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 87804, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T12:36:50.011107", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.933, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.916, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.868, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.77, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.96, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.255, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.064, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.868, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.868, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.77, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.77, "year": 2006, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.622, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.622, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.494, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.494, "year": 2006, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2006, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Coalition the People's Power", "winner_candidate": "Luiz In\u00e1cio Lula da Silva", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Coalition for a decent Brazil", "margin": 21.65, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "BRA", "year": 2006, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:630", "name": "Argentina 2011 PASO \u2014 Diputados Nacionales \u2014 [paso] Diputados Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 85936, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T12:16:05.330736", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.76, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.749, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.573, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.034, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.544, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Front for Victory (FpV)", "winner_candidate": "Cristina Fern\u00e1ndez de Kirchner", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Broad Progressive Front (FAP)", "margin": 37.31, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:629", "name": "Argentina 2011 General \u2014 Presidente \u2014 [general] Presidente", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2011, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 84429, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T12:08:23.625181", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 81447, "n_distinct_geometry": 3791, "quality_index": 3.76, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.749, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.573, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.034, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.544, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Front for Victory (FpV)", "winner_candidate": "Cristina Fern\u00e1ndez de Kirchner", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Broad Progressive Front (FAP)", "margin": 37.31, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:624", "name": "Canada 2000 (Federal)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2000, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: Elections Canada poll-by-poll results (elections.ca/res/rep/off)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 58002, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T11:36:54.071840", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 301, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.876, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.88, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.836, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.756, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.876, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.88, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.611, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.716, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.679, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.756, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.035, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:623", "name": "Canada 1997 (Federal)", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 1997, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: Elections Canada poll-by-poll results (elections.ca/res/rep/off)", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 54901, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T11:32:29.434978", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.712, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.882, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.84, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.76, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.712, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.882, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.608, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.902, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.884, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.348, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 1997, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.76, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.76, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.715, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 1997, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.035, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 1997, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:622", "name": "Mexico 1991 (Diputados)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 1991, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: INE (Instituto Nacional Electoral) casilla-level published results", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 53563, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T11:25:07.828418", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 2566, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.461, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.264, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.41, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.196, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.461, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.615, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.264, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 1991, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.726, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.431, "year": 1991, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.111, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.278, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.655, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.414, "year": 1991, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.41, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 1991, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.196, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.196, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.198, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.613, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.613, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.38, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.38, "year": 1991, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 1991, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 1991, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:621", "name": "Argentina 2023 General \u2014 Senadores Nacionales \u2014 [general] Senadores Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 49249, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T11:18:10.119382", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:620", "name": "Argentina 2017 PASO \u2014 Senadores Nacionales \u2014 [paso] Senadores Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 47499, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T11:11:18.125188", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.926, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.953, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.751, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.609, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.77, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.084, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.375, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.037, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.609, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.577, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.411, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.411, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:619", "name": "Argentina 2017 General \u2014 Senadores Nacionales \u2014 [general] Senadores Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 47493, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T11:04:28.084696", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.926, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.953, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.751, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.609, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.77, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.084, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.375, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.037, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.609, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.577, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.411, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.411, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:617", "name": "Argentina 2021 PASO \u2014 Concejales \u2014 [paso] Concejales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 42513, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T10:52:07.334000", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.934, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.94, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.796, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.639, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.621, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:615", "name": "Argentina 2011 PASO \u2014 Senadores Nacionales \u2014 [paso] Senadores Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40167, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T10:43:04.773861", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.76, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.749, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.573, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.034, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.544, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Front for Victory (FpV)", "winner_candidate": "Cristina Fern\u00e1ndez de Kirchner", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Broad Progressive Front (FAP)", "margin": 37.31, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:614", "name": "Argentina 2011 General \u2014 Gobernador \u2014 [general] Gobernador", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2011, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 38881, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T10:40:10.540112", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.76, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.749, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.573, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.034, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.544, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Front for Victory (FpV)", "winner_candidate": "Cristina Fern\u00e1ndez de Kirchner", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Broad Progressive Front (FAP)", "margin": 37.31, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:611", "name": "Argentina 2017 General \u2014 Concejales \u2014 [general] Concejales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2017, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 36919, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T10:26:15.750999", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.926, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.953, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.751, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.609, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.77, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.084, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.375, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.037, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.609, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.577, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.411, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.411, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:610", "name": "Argentina 2017 PASO \u2014 Concejales \u2014 [paso] Concejales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2017, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 35531, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T10:22:23.790107", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.926, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.953, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.751, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.609, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.77, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.084, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.375, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.037, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.609, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.577, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.411, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.411, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:608", "name": "Argentina 2013 PASO \u2014 Concejales \u2014 [paso] Concejales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2013, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 34036, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T10:15:20.372591", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.953, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.772, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.588, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.742, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.145, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.036, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:605", "name": "Argentina 2021 General \u2014 Senadores Nacionales \u2014 [general] Senadores Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 30715, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T10:04:32.534968", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.934, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.94, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.796, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.639, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.621, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:604", "name": "Argentina 2021 PASO \u2014 Senadores Nacionales \u2014 [paso] Senadores Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 30517, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T10:01:00.858209", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.934, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.94, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.796, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.639, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.621, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:603", "name": "Argentina 2015 General \u2014 Senadores Nacionales \u2014 [general] Senadores Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 28769, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T09:57:30.621323", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.765, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.59, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Cambiemos", "winner_candidate": "M. Macri", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Frente para la Victoria (FplV)", "margin": 2.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:602", "name": "Argentina 2015 General \u2014 Diputados Provinciales \u2014 [general] Diputados Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 26782, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T09:54:26.925672", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.765, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.59, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Cambiemos", "winner_candidate": "M. Macri", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Frente para la Victoria (FplV)", "margin": 2.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:599", "name": "Argentina 2021 General \u2014 Senadores Provinciales \u2014 [general] Senadores Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 23783, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T09:47:14.382929", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.934, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.94, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.796, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.639, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.621, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:598", "name": "Argentina 2017 General \u2014 Senadores Provinciales \u2014 [general] Senadores Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 23624, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T09:45:03.545597", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.926, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.953, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.751, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.609, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.77, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.084, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.375, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.037, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.609, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.577, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.411, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.411, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:597", "name": "Argentina 2017 PASO \u2014 Diputados Provinciales \u2014 [paso] Diputados Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 23499, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T09:42:54.872846", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.926, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.953, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.751, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.609, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.77, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.084, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.375, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.037, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.609, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.577, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.411, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.411, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:593", "name": "Argentina 2019 General \u2014 Senadores Nacionales \u2014 [general] Senadores Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 22153, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T09:32:42.334031", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.915, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.779, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.618, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.998, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.053, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.083, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:592", "name": "Argentina 2019 PASO \u2014 Senadores Nacionales \u2014 [paso] Senadores Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 22051, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T09:30:53.463927", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.915, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.779, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.618, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.998, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.053, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.083, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:591", "name": "Argentina 2013 General \u2014 Senadores Provinciales \u2014 [general] Senadores Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21820, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T09:29:06.731207", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.953, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.772, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.588, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.742, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.145, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.036, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:589", "name": "Argentina 2011 General \u2014 Senadores Nacionales \u2014 [general] Senadores Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21167, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T09:25:28.542798", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.76, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.749, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.573, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.034, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.544, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Front for Victory (FpV)", "winner_candidate": "Cristina Fern\u00e1ndez de Kirchner", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Broad Progressive Front (FAP)", "margin": 37.31, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:588", "name": "Argentina 2013 General \u2014 Senadores Nacionales \u2014 [general] Senadores Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20594, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T09:22:44.235176", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.953, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.772, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.588, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.742, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.145, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.036, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:587", "name": "Argentina 2013 PASO \u2014 Senadores Nacionales \u2014 [paso] Senadores Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20556, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T09:20:08.387365", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.953, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.772, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.588, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.742, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.145, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.036, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:585", "name": "Romania 2024 Presidential R1 (ANNULLED) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Romania", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: unknown", "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19918, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T09:15:40.294401", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.442, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.344, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.628, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.449, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.442, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.611, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.344, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.586, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.505, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.376, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.628, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.449, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.442, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.389, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.389, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:583", "name": "Argentina 2019 PASO \u2014 Diputados Provinciales \u2014 [paso] Diputados Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19656, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T09:10:42.902017", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.915, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.779, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.618, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.998, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.053, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.083, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:581", "name": "Argentina 2011 General \u2014 Senadores Provinciales \u2014 [general] Senadores Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18960, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T09:05:53.694052", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.76, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.749, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.573, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.034, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.544, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Front for Victory (FpV)", "winner_candidate": "Cristina Fern\u00e1ndez de Kirchner", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Broad Progressive Front (FAP)", "margin": 37.31, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:579", "name": "Argentina 2019 General \u2014 Senadores Provinciales \u2014 [general] Senadores Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18424, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T09:02:05.900164", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.915, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.779, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.618, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.998, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.053, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.083, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:572", "name": "Argentina 2011 PASO \u2014 Diputados Provinciales \u2014 [paso] Diputados Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 16451, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T08:48:48.730318", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.76, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.749, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.573, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.034, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.544, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Front for Victory (FpV)", "winner_candidate": "Cristina Fern\u00e1ndez de Kirchner", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Broad Progressive Front (FAP)", "margin": 37.31, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:560", "name": "Argentina 2023 General \u2014 Miembros de la Junta Comunal (CABA) \u2014 [general] Miembros de la Junta Comunal (CABA)", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8770, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T08:33:45.631022", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:559", "name": "Argentina 2023 General \u2014 Jefe de Gobierno (CABA) \u2014 [general] Jefe de Gobierno (CABA)", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8770, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T08:32:29.022970", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:557", "name": "Argentina 2021 PASO \u2014 Diputados de la Ciudad (CABA) \u2014 [paso] Diputados de la Ciudad (CABA)", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8473, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T08:30:23.992075", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.934, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.94, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.796, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.639, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.621, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:554", "name": "Argentina 2019 PASO \u2014 Diputados de la Ciudad (CABA) \u2014 [paso] Diputados de la Ciudad (CABA)", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7459, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T08:27:51.340212", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.915, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.779, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.618, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.998, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.053, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.083, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:553", "name": "Argentina 2019 PASO \u2014 Miembros de la Junta Comunal (CABA) \u2014 [paso] Miembros de la Junta Comunal (CABA)", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2019, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7459, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T08:26:56.177806", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.915, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.779, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.618, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.998, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.053, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.083, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:552", "name": "Argentina 2019 PASO \u2014 Jefe de Gobierno (CABA) \u2014 [paso] Jefe de Gobierno (CABA)", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2019, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7459, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T08:26:08.299376", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.915, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.779, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.618, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.998, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.053, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.083, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:551", "name": "Argentina 2019 General \u2014 Miembros de la Junta Comunal (CABA) \u2014 [general] Miembros de la Junta Comunal (CABA)", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2019, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7387, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T08:25:22.211592", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.915, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.779, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.618, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.998, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.053, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.083, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:550", "name": "Argentina 2019 General \u2014 Jefe de Gobierno (CABA) \u2014 [general] Jefe de Gobierno (CABA)", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2019, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7387, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T08:24:34.807935", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.915, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.779, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.618, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.998, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.053, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.083, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:548", "name": "Argentina 2017 General \u2014 Diputados de la Ciudad (CABA) \u2014 [general] Diputados de la Ciudad (CABA)", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7386, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T08:23:01.606993", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.926, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.953, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.751, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.609, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.77, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.084, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.375, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.037, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.609, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.577, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.411, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.411, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:546", "name": "Czech 2020 Senate R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: \u010cesk\u00fd statistick\u00fd \u00fa\u0159ad CSVW open data (volby.cz/opendata)", "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5160, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T08:22:07.485665", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.234, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.916, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.806, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.709, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.541, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.709, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.709, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.716, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.914, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.914, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.217, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.217, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:544", "name": "Czech 2022 Senate R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: \u010cesk\u00fd statistick\u00fd \u00fa\u0159ad CSVW open data (volby.cz/opendata)", "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4910, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T08:21:03.753700", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.818, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.874, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.854, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.784, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.874, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.886, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.63, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.657, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.769, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.769, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.158, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.158, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:543", "name": "Czech 2024 Senate R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: \u010cesk\u00fd statistick\u00fd \u00fa\u0159ad CSVW open data (volby.cz/opendata)", "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 4718, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T08:20:35.341494", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.865, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.894, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.865, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.811, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.865, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.872, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.095, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.095, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:533", "name": "Argentina 2011 PASO \u2014 Diputados Provinciales (departamentales) [San Juan (departmental seat ballot)] \u2014 [paso] Diputados Provinciales (departamentales)", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1410, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T08:16:59.916181", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.76, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.749, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.573, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.034, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.544, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Front for Victory (FpV)", "winner_candidate": "Cristina Fern\u00e1ndez de Kirchner", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Broad Progressive Front (FAP)", "margin": 37.31, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:531", "name": "Paris 2026 (Municipal, Round 2) \u2014 [runoff] (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2026, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: data.gouv.fr per-bureau-de-vote results (Minist\u00e8re de l'Int\u00e9rieur)", "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 903, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T08:16:12.390420", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.83, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.903, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.865, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.8, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.759, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.5, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.375, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.917, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.056, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.056, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:530", "name": "Paris 2026 (Municipal, Round 1) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2026, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: data.gouv.fr per-bureau-de-vote results (Minist\u00e8re de l'Int\u00e9rieur)", "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 903, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T08:16:06.787938", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.83, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.903, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.865, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.8, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.759, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.5, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.375, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.721, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.721, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.917, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.056, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.056, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2026, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:529", "name": "Argentina 2021 General \u2014 Intendente \u2014 [general] Intendente", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: datos.gob.ar \u2014 C\u00e1mara Nacional Electoral mesa-level CSV exports", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 619, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T08:16:03.236865", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.934, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.94, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.796, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.639, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.621, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:528", "name": "Czech 2025-Jan Senate R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: \u010cesk\u00fd statistick\u00fd \u00fa\u0159ad CSVW open data (volby.cz/opendata)", "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 122, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T08:14:21.721545", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.793, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.849, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.794, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.793, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.869, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.33, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.855, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.849, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.171, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.171, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:527", "name": "Czech 2019-Apr Senate R2 (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: \u010cesk\u00fd statistick\u00fd \u00fa\u0159ad CSVW open data (volby.cz/opendata)", "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 110, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T08:14:20.387814", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.234, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.916, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.8, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.699, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.541, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.18, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.707, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.707, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.939, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.225, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.225, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "SPO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "TOP 09", "margin": 2.74, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "CZE", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:526", "name": "Czech 2019-Apr Senate R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Czech Republic", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": "v1 src: \u010cesk\u00fd statistick\u00fd \u00fa\u0159ad CSVW open data (volby.cz/opendata)", "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 110, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-12T08:14:19.273721", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.234, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.916, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.8, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.699, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.234, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.541, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.18, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.707, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.707, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.939, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.225, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.225, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "SPO", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "TOP 09", "margin": 2.74, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "CZE", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:521", "name": "Pakistan 2024 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Pakistan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1162, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1162}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-11T22:34:00.808864", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.168, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.339, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.313, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.193, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.168, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.339, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.631, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.436, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.109, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.462, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.223, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.406, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.351, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.313, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.313, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.193, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.193, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.114, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.586, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.586, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.818, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.559, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:518", "name": "Iran 2024 president (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Iran", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 32, "granularity": "province", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 32}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-11T22:26:34.516605", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.389, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.858, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.166, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.088, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.389, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.347, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.983, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.584, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.146, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.166, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.166, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.088, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.088, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.152, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.152, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.252, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.252, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.116, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.116, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.23, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.23, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:517", "name": "Iran 2024 president", "metadata": {"country": "Iran", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 31, "granularity": "province", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 31}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-11T22:23:33.137501", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.389, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.858, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.166, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.088, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.389, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.347, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.983, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.697, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.584, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.146, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.166, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.166, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.088, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.088, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.152, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.152, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.252, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.252, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.116, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.116, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.23, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.23, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:516", "name": "Iran 2013 president", "metadata": {"country": "Iran", "year": 2013, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1039, "granularity": "province", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1039}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-11T22:20:38.769567", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.915, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.896, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.174, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.129, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.231, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.558, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.324, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.147, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.492, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.208, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.052, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.174, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.174, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.129, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.129, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.171, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.171, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.239, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.239, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.171, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.171, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.729, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.169, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.169, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "CCA", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Society of Engineers", "margin": 43.44, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "IRN", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:515", "name": "Iran 2009 president", "metadata": {"country": "Iran", "year": 2009, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 366, "granularity": "province", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 366}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-11T22:17:00.825079", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.895, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.521, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.158, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.122, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.224, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.521, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.38, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.544, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.386, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.521, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.13, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.254, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.064, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.557, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.179, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.045, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.158, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.158, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.122, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.122, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.172, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.172, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.225, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.225, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.144, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.144, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.212, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.212, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Abadgaran", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Green Movement", "margin": 29.44, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "IRN", "year": 2009, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:514", "name": "Bolivia 2025 president", "metadata": {"country": "Bolivia", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 35223, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 35223}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-11T22:12:41.235360", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.856, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.781, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.605, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.352, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.781, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.696, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.156, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.712, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.081, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.52, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.605, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.352, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.352, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.741, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.266, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.266, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.68, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.68, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:512", "name": "Sierra Leone 2008 LGE NEC Workflow Audit \u2014 lge_workflow_audit", "metadata": {"country": "Sierra Leone", "year": 2008, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 audited", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "audited"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11771, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2, "cast_exceeds_registered": 513, "turnout_100_pct": 8, "invalidated": 4234}, "n_stations_flagged": 4750, "created_at": "2026-05-08T11:54:25.357359", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.669, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.027, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.517, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.325, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.027, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.398, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.306, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.489, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.517, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.325, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.325, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.288, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.485, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.787, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "APC", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "SLPP", "margin": 9.24, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SLE", "year": 2007, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:511", "name": "Sierra Leone 2007 R2 NEC Workflow Audit \u2014 workflow_audit (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Sierra Leone", "year": 2007, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 audited", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "audited"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6157, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"invalidated": 45, "disputed_votes": 36}, "n_stations_flagged": 81, "created_at": "2026-05-08T11:51:36.628847", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.669, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.027, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.539, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.346, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.027, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.398, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.349, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.489, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.539, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.539, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.346, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.346, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.306, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "APC", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "SLPP", "margin": 9.24, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SLE", "year": 2007, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:510", "name": "Sierra Leone 2007 R1 NEC Workflow Audit \u2014 workflow_audit (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Sierra Leone", "year": 2007, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 audited", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "audited"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6163, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1, "cast_exceeds_registered": 118, "turnout_100_pct": 3, "invalidated": 45}, "n_stations_flagged": 166, "created_at": "2026-05-08T11:49:20.363309", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.669, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.027, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.539, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.346, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.027, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.398, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.349, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.489, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.539, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.539, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.346, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.346, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.306, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "APC", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "SLPP", "margin": 9.24, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SLE", "year": 2007, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:509", "name": "Afghanistan 2009 Provincial Council (Cookman/IEC)", "metadata": {"country": "Afghanistan", "year": 2009, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "contested", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20212, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 20212}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-08T11:11:13.958860", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 17465, "n_distinct_geometry": 4038, "quality_index": 1.769, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.39, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.361, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.196, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.769, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.222, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.555, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.458, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.115, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.097, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.274, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.339, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.289, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.322, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.361, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.361, "year": 2009, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.196, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.196, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.204, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.204, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.54, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.54, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.255, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.255, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": null, "winner_party": "Independent - Hamid Karzai", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent (CCH)", "margin": 21.04, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "AFG", "year": 2009, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:503", "name": "Peru 2021 president (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Peru", "year": 2021, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 86237, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 86237}, "n_stations_flagged": 86237, "created_at": "2026-05-07T22:48:29.678925", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.648, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.496, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.771, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.66, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.496, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.169, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.565, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.182, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.771, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.66, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.481, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:502", "name": "Zimbabwe 2013 Presidential", "metadata": {"country": "Zimbabwe", "year": 2013, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7127, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 7127}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T22:40:08.891981", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.869, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.417, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.289, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.209, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.869, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.417, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.354, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.225, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.556, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.785, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.196, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.234, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.458, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.364, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.905, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.226, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.289, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.209, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.209, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.19, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.19, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.457, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.467, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.744, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.744, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.458, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.458, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "ZANU-PF", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "MDC-Tsvangirai", "margin": 27.79, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ZWE", "year": 2013, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:501", "name": "Sierra 2023 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Sierra Leone", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 16, "granularity": "province", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 16}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T22:38:59.528529", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.869, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.701, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.512, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.391, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.869, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.701, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.425, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.193, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.497, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.705, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.426, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.084, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.391, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.391, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.353, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.353, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.65, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.554, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.554, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:499", "name": "Malawi 2020 president", "metadata": {"country": "Malawi", "year": 2020, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 9183, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T22:32:21.378332", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.702, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.87, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.534, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.462, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.702, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.718, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.476, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.995, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.499, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.128, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.244, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.311, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.386, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.346, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.534, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.534, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.462, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.462, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.317, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.317, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.679, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.679, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:498", "name": "Croatia 2024 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Croatia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6648, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 106}, "n_stations_flagged": 106, "created_at": "2026-05-07T22:26:59.481436", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.765, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.925, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.71, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.607, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.925, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.66, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.175, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.106, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.811, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.453, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.613, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.71, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.556, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.556, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.828, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.828, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.254, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.254, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:497", "name": "Israel 2020 mp \u2014 knesset_23", "metadata": {"country": "Israel", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11179, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 548}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T15:24:24.262313", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.81, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.936, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.723, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.639, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.81, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.186, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.28, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.389, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.723, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.723, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.84, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.84, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.109, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.109, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:481", "name": "Spain 2023 mp \u2014 cortes_total", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 60366, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 43}, "n_stations_flagged": 43, "created_at": "2026-05-07T14:30:34.466302", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.831, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.269, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.846, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.759, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.269, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.603, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.946, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.91, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.477, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.067, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.067, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.885, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:480", "name": "Spain 2019 mp \u2014 nov", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 59607, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 26}, "n_stations_flagged": 26, "created_at": "2026-05-07T14:25:29.200954", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 55216, "n_distinct_geometry": 8745, "quality_index": 3.945, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.908, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.871, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.804, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.036, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.036, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:478", "name": "Nigeria 2023 president \u2014 anambra", "metadata": {"country": "Nigeria", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3679, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-05-07T14:22:34.161879", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3614, "n_distinct_geometry": 876, "quality_index": 2.108, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.659, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.484, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.316, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.108, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.527, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.659, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.365, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.995, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.249, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.514, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.383, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.808, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.452, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.484, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.484, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.316, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.316, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.28, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.28, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.666, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.666, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.415, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:477", "name": "Kyrgyzstan 2021 mp \u2014 jk_2021_nov_r3", "metadata": {"country": "Kyrgyzstan", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2494, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T14:21:34.982084", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2494, "n_distinct_geometry": 9, "quality_index": 2.623, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.96, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.41, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.256, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.623, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.96, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.613, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.157, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.777, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.444, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.41, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.256, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.256, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.278, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.278, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.66, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.412, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.619, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:476", "name": "Kyrgyzstan 2021 mp \u2014 jk_2021_apr_r2", "metadata": {"country": "Kyrgyzstan", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2483, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T14:20:38.797771", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2483, "n_distinct_geometry": 9, "quality_index": 2.623, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.96, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.41, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.256, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.623, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.96, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.613, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.157, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.777, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.444, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.41, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.256, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.256, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.278, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.278, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.66, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.412, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.619, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:475", "name": "Kyrgyzstan 2021 mp \u2014 jk_2021_jan_r2", "metadata": {"country": "Kyrgyzstan", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2474, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T14:19:36.478125", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2474, "n_distinct_geometry": 9, "quality_index": 2.623, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.96, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.41, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.256, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.623, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.96, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.613, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.157, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.777, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.444, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.41, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.256, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.256, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.278, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.278, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.66, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.412, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.619, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:474", "name": "Israel 2020 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Israel", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 12545, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 838}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T14:17:42.487091", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.803, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.928, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.714, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.64, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.28, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.306, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.714, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.64, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.64, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.571, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.105, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.105, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:472", "name": "Israel 2020 mp \u2014 knesset_22", "metadata": {"country": "Israel", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10901, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 362, "cast_exceeds_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-05-07T14:14:57.554386", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.429, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.936, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.708, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.623, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.429, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.544, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.626, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.28, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.389, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.623, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.623, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.562, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.124, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.124, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:471", "name": "Nz 2020 mp \u2014 cannabis", "metadata": {"country": "New Zealand", "year": 2020, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 137, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 137}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T14:13:54.493485", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.863, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.933, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.826, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.777, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.742, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.475, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.009, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.009, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:470", "name": "Nz 2020 mp \u2014 eolc", "metadata": {"country": "New Zealand", "year": 2020, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 137, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 137}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T14:13:06.616074", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.863, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.933, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.882, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.826, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.777, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.742, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.475, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.882, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.775, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.775, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.009, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.009, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:463", "name": "Venezuela 2024 president", "metadata": {"country": "Venezuela", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 24532, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T13:31:09.965155", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.117, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 0.535, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.196, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.046, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.117, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.029, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 0.535, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.134, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.227, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.108, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.027, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.171, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.662, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.898, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.225, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.196, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.196, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.046, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.046, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.094, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.094, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.335, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.016, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.211, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.211, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:460", "name": "Uk 2024 mp", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 650, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T13:19:10.589884", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.864, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.951, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.832, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.75, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.5, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.144, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.286, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.124, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.281, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.675, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.043, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.043, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:459", "name": "Uk 2019 mp", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 650, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T13:18:18.985429", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.919, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.958, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.854, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.787, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.619, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.905, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.369, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.569, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.392, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.854, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.787, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.716, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.91, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.91, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.916, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.041, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.041, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:458", "name": "Uk 2017 mp", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 650, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T13:17:33.040121", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.915, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.958, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.865, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.801, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.958, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.663, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.531, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.883, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.389, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.038, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.038, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:457", "name": "Uk 2015 mp", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 650, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T13:16:47.468034", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.721, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.961, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.855, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.788, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.721, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.961, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.526, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.646, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.788, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.788, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.728, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.04, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.04, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:456", "name": "Uk 2010 mp", "metadata": {"country": "United Kingdom", "year": 2010, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 650, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T13:16:00.423038", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.766, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.965, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.866, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.802, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.766, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.965, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.961, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.396, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.748, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.556, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.596, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.399, "year": 2010, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.741, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 2010, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.04, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.04, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2010, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:454", "name": "Turkiye 2018 president", "metadata": {"country": "Turkey", "year": 2018, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 180524, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 25, "cast_exceeds_registered": 3527, "turnout_100_pct": 1338}, "n_stations_flagged": 4865, "created_at": "2026-05-07T13:02:56.839572", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.372, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.454, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.295, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.104, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.372, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.593, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.454, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.507, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.377, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.35, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.21, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2018, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.092, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.295, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.104, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.104, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.228, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.228, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.357, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.357, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.15, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.15, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.198, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.198, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Justice and Development Party (AK)", "winner_candidate": "Recep Tayyip Erdo\u011fan", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Republican People's Party (CHP)", "margin": 21.95, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "TUR", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:453", "name": "Turkiye 2014 president", "metadata": {"country": "Turkey", "year": 2014, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 165467, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 16, "cast_exceeds_registered": 1742, "turnout_100_pct": 863}, "n_stations_flagged": 2605, "created_at": "2026-05-07T12:57:15.995202", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.714, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.529, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.426, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.252, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.678, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.529, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.882, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.678, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.977, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.494, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.279, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.354, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.28, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.32, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.426, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.426, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.252, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.252, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.311, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.311, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.538, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.538, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.576, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.576, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.777, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.777, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.368, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.368, "year": 2014, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Justice and Development Party (AK)", "winner_candidate": "Recep Tayyip Erdo\u011fan", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Joint candidate of several (heterogeneous) opposition parties", "margin": 13.35, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "TUR", "year": 2014, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:452", "name": "Taiwan 2024 president", "metadata": {"country": "Taiwan", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17795, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T12:55:58.260880", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.877, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.941, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.804, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.707, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.294, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.462, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.616, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.707, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.707, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.699, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.699, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.22, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.22, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:451", "name": "Taiwan 2020 president", "metadata": {"country": "Taiwan", "year": 2020, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17226, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T12:54:47.373635", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.898, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.945, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.82, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.719, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.898, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.637, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.411, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.984, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.719, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.735, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.934, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.934, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.876, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.189, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.189, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:450", "name": "Taiwan 2016 president", "metadata": {"country": "Taiwan", "year": 2016, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15582, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T12:53:37.270703", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.906, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.912, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.835, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.727, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.906, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.605, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.348, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.346, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.743, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.743, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.273, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.273, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:449", "name": "Taiwan 2012 president", "metadata": {"country": "Taiwan", "year": 2012, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 14806, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T12:52:24.593531", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.707, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.77, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.676, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.707, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.77, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.39, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.374, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.195, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.549, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.676, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.697, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.697, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.768, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.331, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.908, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Kuomintang", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Democratic Progressive Party", "margin": 5.97, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "TWN", "year": 2012, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:448", "name": "Srilanka 2024 president", "metadata": {"country": "Sri Lanka", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 182, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T12:51:41.070320", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.677, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.497, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.462, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.085, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.364, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.497, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.497, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.481, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:447", "name": "Srilanka 2024 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Sri Lanka", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 182, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T12:50:55.904090", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.677, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.497, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.888, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.462, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.085, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.856, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.714, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.364, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.677, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.677, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.497, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.497, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.481, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:446", "name": "Srilanka 2019 president", "metadata": {"country": "Sri Lanka", "year": 2019, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 205, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T12:50:13.148990", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.878, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.9, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.564, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.439, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.9, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.791, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.611, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.731, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.561, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.39, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.564, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.564, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.439, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.439, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.399, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.399, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.503, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.702, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:445", "name": "Srilanka 2015 president", "metadata": {"country": "Sri Lanka", "year": 2015, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 205, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T12:49:30.669618", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.168, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.036, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.55, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.397, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.168, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.036, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.401, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.534, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.785, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.731, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.192, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.55, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.55, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.397, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.397, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.361, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.361, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.735, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.515, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.515, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.692, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "New Democratic Front (NDF)", "winner_candidate": "Maithripala Sirisena", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "United People's Freedom Alliance (UPFA)", "margin": 3.7, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "LKA", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:443", "name": "Spain 2019 mp \u2014 apr", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 60090, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 2, "turnout_100_pct": 40}, "n_stations_flagged": 42, "created_at": "2026-05-07T12:40:28.708120", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 55663, "n_distinct_geometry": 8745, "quality_index": 3.945, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.908, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.871, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.804, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.945, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.506, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.036, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.036, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:442", "name": "Spain 2016 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 57583, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 33}, "n_stations_flagged": 33, "created_at": "2026-05-07T12:35:48.777959", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 53596, "n_distinct_geometry": 8745, "quality_index": 3.868, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.971, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.847, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.766, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.971, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.993, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.882, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.613, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.758, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.766, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.766, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.062, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.062, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:441", "name": "Spain 2015 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 57563, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2, "turnout_100_pct": 17}, "n_stations_flagged": 17, "created_at": "2026-05-07T12:31:20.491590", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 53576, "n_distinct_geometry": 8745, "quality_index": 3.868, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.971, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.856, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.759, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.971, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.993, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.882, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.85, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.613, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.758, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.757, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.948, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.053, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.053, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:440", "name": "Spain 2011 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 59928, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 22}, "n_stations_flagged": 22, "created_at": "2026-05-07T12:26:59.773152", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 55878, "n_distinct_geometry": 8745, "quality_index": 3.951, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.973, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.821, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.973, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.993, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.965, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.719, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.801, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.45, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.809, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.041, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.041, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:439", "name": "Spain 2008 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 59398, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 4, "turnout_100_pct": 24}, "n_stations_flagged": 28, "created_at": "2026-05-07T12:22:04.205373", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 55412, "n_distinct_geometry": 8745, "quality_index": 3.95, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.973, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.886, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.819, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.95, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.973, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.993, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.965, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.991, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.788, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.719, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.8, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.45, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.038, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.038, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:438", "name": "Spain 2004 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 56637, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 7, "turnout_100_pct": 9}, "n_stations_flagged": 16, "created_at": "2026-05-07T12:17:52.711309", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 52585, "n_distinct_geometry": 8745, "quality_index": 3.896, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.936, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.875, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.808, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.938, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.7, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.719, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.369, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.092, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.798, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.038, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.038, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:437", "name": "Spain 2000 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 2000, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 53696, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-05-07T12:13:48.538278", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 49730, "n_distinct_geometry": 8745, "quality_index": 3.897, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.817, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.705, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.719, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.36, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.09, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.038, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.038, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:436", "name": "Spain 1996 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 1996, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 49269, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 2, "turnout_100_pct": 10}, "n_stations_flagged": 12, "created_at": "2026-05-07T12:10:08.118317", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 45360, "n_distinct_geometry": 8745, "quality_index": 3.894, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.94, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.82, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.894, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.937, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.704, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.719, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.358, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.089, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.82, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.82, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.962, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.038, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.038, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:435", "name": "Spain 1993 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 1993, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 46761, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1, "cast_exceeds_registered": 9, "turnout_100_pct": 9}, "n_stations_flagged": 18, "created_at": "2026-05-07T12:06:29.368216", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 42896, "n_distinct_geometry": 8745, "quality_index": 3.876, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.892, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.818, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.876, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.704, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.719, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.379, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.095, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.818, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.818, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.813, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.813, "year": 1993, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.038, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.038, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1993, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:434", "name": "Spain 1989 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 1989, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 44334, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 15, "turnout_100_pct": 15}, "n_stations_flagged": 30, "created_at": "2026-05-07T12:03:05.572049", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 40474, "n_distinct_geometry": 8745, "quality_index": 3.896, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.891, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.81, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.691, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.719, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.782, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.364, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.091, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 1989, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.804, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 1989, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.038, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.038, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1989, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:433", "name": "Spain 1986 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 1986, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 42791, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 67, "cast_exceeds_registered": 60, "turnout_100_pct": 17}, "n_stations_flagged": 77, "created_at": "2026-05-07T12:00:15.553636", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 39323, "n_distinct_geometry": 8745, "quality_index": 3.9, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.937, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.89, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.805, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.9, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.937, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.706, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.719, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.485, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.357, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.089, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 1986, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.797, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.797, "year": 1986, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.897, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.038, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.038, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 1986, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:432", "name": "Spain 1982 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Spain", "year": 1982, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40813, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 482, "cast_exceeds_registered": 236, "turnout_100_pct": 60}, "n_stations_flagged": 296, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:57:22.358134", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 35895, "n_distinct_geometry": 8695, "quality_index": 3.896, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.937, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.881, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.791, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.937, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.707, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.719, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.485, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.461, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.115, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.791, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 1982, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 1982, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.041, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.041, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 1982, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:431", "name": "Southkorea 2024 mp", "metadata": {"country": "South Korea", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17868, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 23, "turnout_100_pct": 1857}, "n_stations_flagged": 1880, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:56:03.715626", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.866, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.231, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.724, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.627, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.866, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.231, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.864, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.062, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.288, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.072, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.627, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.627, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.156, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.156, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:430", "name": "Sierra 2023 president", "metadata": {"country": "Sierra Leone", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1, "granularity": "constituency", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:55:29.081030", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.869, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.701, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.512, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.391, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.869, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.467, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.701, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.425, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.193, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.548, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.497, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.705, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.426, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.868, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.717, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.084, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.512, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.512, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.391, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.391, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.353, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.353, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.811, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.811, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.65, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.65, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.554, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.554, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:429", "name": "Sierra 2008 councillor", "metadata": {"country": "Sierra Leone", "year": 2008, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5429, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1, "cast_exceeds_registered": 512, "turnout_100_pct": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 514, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:54:41.830953", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.669, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.027, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.517, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.325, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.027, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.398, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.306, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.489, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.517, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.325, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.325, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.288, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.485, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.787, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "APC", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "SLPP", "margin": 9.24, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SLE", "year": 2007, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:428", "name": "Sierra 2008 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Sierra Leone", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5883, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1, "cast_exceeds_registered": 1, "turnout_100_pct": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 7, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:53:54.746231", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.669, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.027, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.517, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.325, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.027, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.398, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.306, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.489, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.517, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.517, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.325, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.325, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.288, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.803, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.485, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.485, "year": 2008, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.787, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "APC", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "SLPP", "margin": 9.24, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SLE", "year": 2007, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:427", "name": "Sierra 2007 president R2 (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Sierra Leone", "year": 2007, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6157, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 133}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:53:06.281396", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.669, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.027, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.539, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.346, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.027, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.398, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.349, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.489, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.539, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.539, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.346, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.346, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.306, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "APC", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "SLPP", "margin": 9.24, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SLE", "year": 2007, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:426", "name": "Sierra 2007 president R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Sierra Leone", "year": 2007, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6163, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 146, "cast_exceeds_registered": 111, "turnout_100_pct": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 114, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:52:18.214944", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.669, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.027, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.539, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.346, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.027, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.757, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.954, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.398, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.349, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.587, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.489, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.539, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.539, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.346, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.346, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.306, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 2007, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.801, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.545, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.545, "year": 2007, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2007, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2007, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "APC", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "SLPP", "margin": 9.24, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "SLE", "year": 2007, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:425", "name": "Portugal 2024 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3092, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:51:34.840185", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.674, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.836, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.754, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.674, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.912, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.813, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.575, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.644, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.754, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.689, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.166, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.166, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.899, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.899, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:424", "name": "Portugal 2022 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Portugal", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3092, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:50:51.868670", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.7, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.951, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.847, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.758, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.7, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.951, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.814, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.563, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.758, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.758, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.917, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.139, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.139, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:422", "name": "Peru 2021 president R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Peru", "year": 2021, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 86488, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 9335, "turnout_100_pct": 94}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:41:49.463374", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 75265, "n_distinct_geometry": 198, "quality_index": 3.648, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.496, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.771, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.66, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.496, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.169, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.565, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.182, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.795, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.771, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.66, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.481, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.481, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.829, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.829, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:419", "name": "Nz 2023 mp", "metadata": {"country": "New Zealand", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 8532, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 10, "turnout_100_pct": 8522}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:38:42.168014", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 7886, "n_distinct_geometry": 2440, "quality_index": 3.841, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.913, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.88, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.824, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.719, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.394, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.849, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.671, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.957, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.977, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.008, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.008, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:417", "name": "Nz 2017 mp", "metadata": {"country": "New Zealand", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7324, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 15, "turnout_100_pct": 7309}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:37:05.006470", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 3990, "n_distinct_geometry": 2998, "quality_index": 3.872, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.934, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.879, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.822, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.872, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.788, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.541, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.009, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.009, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.939, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:416", "name": "Nz 2014 mp", "metadata": {"country": "New Zealand", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5884, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 45, "turnout_100_pct": 5839}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:36:08.400054", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 3282, "n_distinct_geometry": 2691, "quality_index": 3.872, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.932, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.886, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.831, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.872, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.916, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.787, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.539, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.009, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.009, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:415", "name": "Nz 2011 mp", "metadata": {"country": "New Zealand", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6129, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 57, "turnout_100_pct": 6072}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:35:12.589913", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.876, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.94, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.891, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.837, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.876, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.923, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.79, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.948, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.535, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.634, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.891, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.787, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.009, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.009, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.954, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:414", "name": "Nz 2008 mp", "metadata": {"country": "New Zealand", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6009, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 53, "turnout_100_pct": 5956}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:34:19.734342", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.873, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.939, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.88, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.825, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.939, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.796, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.635, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.88, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.88, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.009, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.009, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:413", "name": "Nz 2005 mp", "metadata": {"country": "New Zealand", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5770, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 59, "turnout_100_pct": 5711}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:33:27.068192", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.69, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.938, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.879, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.824, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.69, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.938, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.924, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.264, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.529, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.879, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.009, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.009, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:412", "name": "Nz 2002 mp", "metadata": {"country": "New Zealand", "year": 2002, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5859, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 52, "turnout_100_pct": 5807}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:32:33.675779", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.763, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.885, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.881, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.826, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.885, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.699, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2002, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.826, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.826, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.778, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2002, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.009, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.009, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.958, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2002, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:411", "name": "Nmacedonia 2025 mp R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "North Macedonia", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3552, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 17}, "n_stations_flagged": 17, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:31:50.859681", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.119, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.293, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.562, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.374, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.293, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.823, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.517, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.285, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.393, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.913, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.728, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.364, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.591, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.562, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.562, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.373, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.373, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.789, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.789, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.753, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.753, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.664, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.664, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:408", "name": "Maldives 2026 referendum", "metadata": {"country": "Maldives", "year": 2026, "election_type": "referendum", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 588, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:23:50.198769", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.205, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.111, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.556, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.416, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.205, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.801, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.111, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.778, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.236, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.897, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.448, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.775, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.694, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.091, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.523, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.556, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.556, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.416, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.416, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.371, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.371, "year": 2026, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.722, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.722, "year": 2026, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.312, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.312, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2026, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:407", "name": "Kyrgyzstan 2025 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Kyrgyzstan", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2619, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 127}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:23:06.511781", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2619, "n_distinct_geometry": 9, "quality_index": 2.371, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.215, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.313, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.178, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.371, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.593, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.215, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.804, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.992, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.748, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.647, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.218, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.805, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.682, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.42, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.313, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.313, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.178, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.178, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.235, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.235, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.478, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.478, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.358, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.358, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.469, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:406", "name": "Kyrgyzstan 2021 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Kyrgyzstan", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2474, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:22:22.530598", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2474, "n_distinct_geometry": 9, "quality_index": 2.623, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.96, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.41, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.256, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.623, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.96, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.858, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.715, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.613, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.403, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.157, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.777, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.444, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.41, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.256, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.256, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.278, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.278, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.66, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.66, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.412, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.833, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.619, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:405", "name": "Kyrgyzstan 2020 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Kyrgyzstan", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2475, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:21:41.273561", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2475, "n_distinct_geometry": 9, "quality_index": 1.818, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 0.608, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.385, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.255, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 0.608, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.152, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.702, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.675, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.407, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.352, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.177, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.816, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.704, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.717, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.429, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.385, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.385, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.255, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.255, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.274, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.274, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.652, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.427, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.427, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.813, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.813, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:404", "name": "Kyrgyzstan 2017 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Kyrgyzstan", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2375, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:20:57.009571", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2375, "n_distinct_geometry": 9, "quality_index": 2.284, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.148, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.449, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.303, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.148, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.787, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.807, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.702, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.739, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.435, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.218, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.759, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.69, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.378, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.344, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.449, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.303, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.303, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.313, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.313, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.667, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.667, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.437, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.437, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.719, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.719, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Social Democratic Party of Kyrgyzstan (SDPK)", "winner_candidate": "Sooronbay Jeenbekov", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 20.73, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "KGZ", "year": 2017, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:403", "name": "Kyrgyzstan 2016 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Kyrgyzstan", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2365, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:20:15.582926", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2365, "n_distinct_geometry": 9, "quality_index": 2.233, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.146, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.447, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.303, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.233, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.558, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.146, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.135, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.677, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.419, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.223, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.629, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.657, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.261, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.315, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.447, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.447, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.303, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.303, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.308, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.308, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.664, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.664, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.455, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.729, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.729, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Social Democratic Party of Kyrgyzstan (SDPK)", "winner_candidate": "Sooronbay Jeenbekov", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 20.73, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "KGZ", "year": 2017, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:402", "name": "Kyrgyzstan 2015 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Kyrgyzstan", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2374, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-05-07T11:19:35.177504", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 2374, "n_distinct_geometry": 9, "quality_index": 2.233, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.146, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.455, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.317, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.233, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.558, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.146, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.786, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.135, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.677, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.419, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.061, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.265, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.679, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.261, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.315, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.455, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.455, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.317, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.317, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.312, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.312, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.664, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.664, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.456, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.456, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.856, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.856, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.742, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:394", "name": "Indonesia 2019 president", "metadata": {"country": "Indonesia", "year": 2019, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 806583, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 806583}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T08:21:15.938958", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 671233, "n_distinct_geometry": 380, "quality_index": 3.466, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.09, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.596, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.459, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.466, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.09, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.506, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.876, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.384, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.596, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.298, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.477, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.449, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.596, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.596, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.459, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.459, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.372, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.754, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.754, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.741, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:391", "name": "Hungary 2022 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Hungary", "year": 2022, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 10243, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 23}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T08:18:40.836878", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.355, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.757, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.447, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.335, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.355, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.589, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.757, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.939, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.551, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.638, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.186, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.546, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.559, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.287, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.348, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.087, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.447, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.447, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.335, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.335, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.317, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.317, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.632, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.632, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.505, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.505, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:375", "name": "Georgia 2024 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Georgia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3110, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 80, "cast_exceeds_registered": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-05-07T08:06:17.011475", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.642, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 0.436, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.48, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.327, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.642, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.41, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 0.436, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.109, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.121, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.53, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.708, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.177, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.599, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.4, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.168, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.542, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.48, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.48, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.327, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.327, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.374, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.374, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.776, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.776, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.443, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.443, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.188, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.188, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.701, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.701, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:370", "name": "Chile 2025 senator", "metadata": {"country": "Chile", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 11483, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-05-07T07:32:20.266798", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 11483, "n_distinct_geometry": 7, "quality_index": 3.841, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.921, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.839, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.781, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.727, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.64, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.64, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.075, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.075, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:369", "name": "Chile 2025 president R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Chile", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40472, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 46, "turnout_100_pct": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 54, "created_at": "2026-05-07T07:29:36.813018", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 40472, "n_distinct_geometry": 14, "quality_index": 3.841, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.921, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.839, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.781, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.727, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.64, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.64, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.075, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.075, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:368", "name": "Chile 2025 president", "metadata": {"country": "Chile", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40900, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 46, "turnout_100_pct": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 54, "created_at": "2026-05-07T07:27:38.224352", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 40473, "n_distinct_geometry": 14, "quality_index": 3.841, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.921, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.839, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.781, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.727, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.64, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.64, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.075, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.075, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:367", "name": "Chile 2025 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Chile", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 40473, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 38, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 39, "created_at": "2026-05-07T07:20:22.325506", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 40473, "n_distinct_geometry": 14, "quality_index": 3.841, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.921, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.839, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.781, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.841, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.921, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.727, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.803, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.533, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.633, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.64, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.64, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.075, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.075, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:365", "name": "Bangladesh 2024 mp", "metadata": {"country": "Bangladesh", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 41903, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-05-07T07:13:30.963624", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.87, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.571, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.225, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.097, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.217, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.571, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.393, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.527, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.382, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.179, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.045, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.547, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.137, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.17, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.292, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.565, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.141, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.225, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.225, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.097, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.097, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.114, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.114, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.56, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.309, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.309, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.444, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.444, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:363", "name": "France 2024 ep", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 70101, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T06:40:05.621024", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 68267, "n_distinct_geometry": 66342, "quality_index": 3.83, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.903, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.864, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.8, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.83, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.903, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.759, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.5, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.375, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.864, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.864, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.8, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.8, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.049, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.049, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.959, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:362", "name": "France 2022 president R2 (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2022, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 69671, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T06:37:13.085402", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 66624, "n_distinct_geometry": 65801, "quality_index": 3.846, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.918, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.875, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.807, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.625, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.406, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.807, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.045, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.045, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:361", "name": "France 2022 president R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2022, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 69672, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T06:34:13.001504", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 66624, "n_distinct_geometry": 65801, "quality_index": 3.846, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.918, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.875, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.807, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.843, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.625, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.406, "year": 2022, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.807, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.761, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.761, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.92, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.045, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.045, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:359", "name": "France 2019 ep", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 69297, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T06:28:14.258030", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 65956, "n_distinct_geometry": 65801, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.928, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.866, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.793, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.901, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.441, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.866, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.866, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.793, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.793, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.764, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.061, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.061, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:358", "name": "France 2017 president R2 (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2017, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 69241, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T06:25:26.141353", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 65382, "n_distinct_geometry": 65445, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.928, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.886, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.817, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.901, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.441, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.053, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.053, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:357", "name": "France 2017 president R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "France", "year": 2017, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 69241, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T06:22:40.375140", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 65382, "n_distinct_geometry": 65445, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.928, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.886, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.817, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.491, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.901, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.441, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.817, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.817, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.792, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.792, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.053, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.053, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.97, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.97, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:342", "name": "Argentina 2025 Generales \u2014 Senadores Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 25861, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-05-07T05:35:11.029256", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.89, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.936, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.69, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.524, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.578, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.166, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.417, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.69, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.69, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.524, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.5, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.5, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.64, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.64, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.415, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:341", "name": "Argentina 2025 Generales \u2014 Diputados Nacionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 108992, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 8, "created_at": "2026-05-07T05:28:51.167294", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.89, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.936, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.69, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.524, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.89, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.578, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.166, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.417, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.854, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.071, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.69, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.69, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.524, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.524, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.5, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.5, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.821, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.64, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.64, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.415, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:340", "name": "Argentina 2023 Segunda Vuelta \u2014 Presidente y Vice", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 104520, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 36}, "n_stations_flagged": 36, "created_at": "2026-05-07T05:24:33.596424", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 104040, "n_distinct_geometry": 3906, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:339", "name": "Argentina 2023 General \u2014 Senadores Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20506, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-05-07T05:21:26.189109", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:336", "name": "Argentina 2023 General \u2014 Parlamento Mercosur Regional", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 104520, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 15}, "n_stations_flagged": 15, "created_at": "2026-05-07T05:09:58.751554", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:332", "name": "Argentina 2023 General \u2014 Intendente", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 42136, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 14}, "n_stations_flagged": 14, "created_at": "2026-05-07T05:01:07.548963", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:331", "name": "Argentina 2023 General \u2014 Gobernador Y Vice", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 41259, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-05-07T04:59:49.323919", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.907, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.943, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.838, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.695, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.943, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.709, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.127, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.073, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.695, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.906, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.906, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.781, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.781, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.404, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.404, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:326", "name": "Argentina 2021 PASO \u2014 Senadores Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 23482, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T03:21:30.062608", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.934, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.94, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.796, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.639, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.621, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:324", "name": "Argentina 2021 PASO \u2014 Intendentes", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 23, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T03:16:20.171488", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.934, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.94, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.796, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.639, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.621, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:323", "name": "Argentina 2021 PASO \u2014 Diputados Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 26281, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T03:13:41.478184", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.934, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.94, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.796, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.639, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.621, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:316", "name": "Argentina 2021 General \u2014 Gobernador", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2337, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-07T02:51:06.590026", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.934, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.94, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.796, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.639, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.934, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.985, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.212, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.803, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.237, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.809, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.54, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.885, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.065, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.796, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.796, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.639, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.639, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.621, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.621, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.479, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.479, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:311", "name": "Argentina 2019 PASO \u2014 Senadores Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19133, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 4}, "n_stations_flagged": 4, "created_at": "2026-05-07T02:33:53.647084", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.915, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.779, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.618, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.998, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.053, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.083, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:309", "name": "Argentina 2019 PASO \u2014 Presidente", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2019, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 98834, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 2, "turnout_100_pct": 34}, "n_stations_flagged": 36, "created_at": "2026-05-07T02:27:23.638430", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.915, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.779, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.618, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.998, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.053, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.083, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:306", "name": "Argentina 2019 PASO \u2014 Intendente", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2019, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 37165, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 12}, "n_stations_flagged": 12, "created_at": "2026-05-07T02:20:11.873218", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.915, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.779, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.618, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.998, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.053, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.083, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:305", "name": "Argentina 2019 PASO \u2014 Gobernador", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2019, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 38085, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 13}, "n_stations_flagged": 13, "created_at": "2026-05-07T02:16:43.091764", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.915, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.949, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.779, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.618, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.949, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.899, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.998, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.053, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.468, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.083, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.779, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.779, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.618, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.612, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.612, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.408, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.408, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.86, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:291", "name": "Argentina 2017 PASO \u2014 Senadores Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 23201, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 187, "turnout_100_pct": 8}, "n_stations_flagged": 195, "created_at": "2026-05-07T01:34:45.650282", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.926, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.953, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.751, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.609, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.77, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.084, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.375, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.037, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.609, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.577, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.411, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.411, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:289", "name": "Argentina 2017 PASO \u2014 Diputados As De La Ciudad", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 7386, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 7}, "n_stations_flagged": 7, "created_at": "2026-05-07T01:28:40.406632", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.926, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.953, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.751, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.609, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.77, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.024, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.756, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.084, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.375, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.149, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.037, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.751, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.609, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.609, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.577, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.577, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.75, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.75, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.411, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.411, "year": 2017, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:279", "name": "Argentina 2015 Generales \u2014 Senadores Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 21246, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 11}, "n_stations_flagged": 11, "created_at": "2026-05-07T01:02:26.005642", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.765, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.59, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Cambiemos", "winner_candidate": "M. Macri", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Frente para la Victoria (FplV)", "margin": 2.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:277", "name": "Argentina 2015 Generales \u2014 Presidente", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2015, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 93655, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 55}, "n_stations_flagged": 55, "created_at": "2026-05-07T00:57:45.994457", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 93221, "n_distinct_geometry": 8998, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.765, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.59, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Cambiemos", "winner_candidate": "M. Macri", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Frente para la Victoria (FplV)", "margin": 2.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:276", "name": "Argentina 2015 Generales \u2014 Parlamentarios MERCOSUR (Provinciales)", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 93655, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 53}, "n_stations_flagged": 53, "created_at": "2026-05-07T00:52:42.326035", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.765, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.59, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Cambiemos", "winner_candidate": "M. Macri", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Frente para la Victoria (FplV)", "margin": 2.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:274", "name": "Argentina 2015 Generales \u2014 Intendente", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2015, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 34718, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 22}, "n_stations_flagged": 22, "created_at": "2026-05-07T00:45:48.369330", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.765, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.59, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Cambiemos", "winner_candidate": "M. Macri", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Frente para la Victoria (FplV)", "margin": 2.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:273", "name": "Argentina 2015 Generales \u2014 Gobernador", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2015, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 46872, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 29}, "n_stations_flagged": 29, "created_at": "2026-05-07T00:43:03.266149", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.743, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.935, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.765, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.59, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.743, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.935, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.654, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.913, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.73, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.682, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.119, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.603, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.603, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.875, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.646, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.525, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.525, "year": 2015, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.874, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.874, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Cambiemos", "winner_candidate": "M. Macri", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Frente para la Victoria (FplV)", "margin": 2.68, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2015, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:266", "name": "Argentina 2013 PASO \u2014 Senadores As Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17633, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 75, "turnout_100_pct": 5}, "n_stations_flagged": 80, "created_at": "2026-05-07T00:25:09.335366", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.953, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.772, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.588, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.742, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.145, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.036, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:264", "name": "Argentina 2013 PASO \u2014 Diputados (Provinciales)", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2013, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19845, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 91, "turnout_100_pct": 12}, "n_stations_flagged": 103, "created_at": "2026-05-07T00:21:25.695333", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.871, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.953, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.772, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.588, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.953, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.988, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.742, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.765, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.145, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.036, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2013, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.588, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.607, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.607, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2013, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.551, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.551, "year": 2013, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.895, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.895, "year": 2013, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:257", "name": "Argentina 2011 PASO \u2014 Senadores As Provinciales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 15971, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 606, "turnout_100_pct": 13}, "n_stations_flagged": 619, "created_at": "2026-05-06T23:58:23.286614", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.76, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.749, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.573, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.034, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.544, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Front for Victory (FpV)", "winner_candidate": "Cristina Fern\u00e1ndez de Kirchner", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Broad Progressive Front (FAP)", "margin": 37.31, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:255", "name": "Argentina 2011 PASO \u2014 Presidente A", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2011, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 85936, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 862, "turnout_100_pct": 26}, "n_stations_flagged": 888, "created_at": "2026-05-06T23:51:32.175518", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.76, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.749, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.573, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.034, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.544, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Front for Victory (FpV)", "winner_candidate": "Cristina Fern\u00e1ndez de Kirchner", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Broad Progressive Front (FAP)", "margin": 37.31, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:254", "name": "Argentina 2011 PASO \u2014 Gobernador A", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2011, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 33832, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 839, "turnout_100_pct": 13}, "n_stations_flagged": 852, "created_at": "2026-05-06T23:48:30.812764", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.76, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.749, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.573, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.034, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.544, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Front for Victory (FpV)", "winner_candidate": "Cristina Fern\u00e1ndez de Kirchner", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Broad Progressive Front (FAP)", "margin": 37.31, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:253", "name": "Argentina 2011 PASO \u2014 Diputados As Provinciales Proporcionales", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2011, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1410, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 6}, "n_stations_flagged": 6, "created_at": "2026-05-06T23:47:16.572238", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.76, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.749, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.573, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.034, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.544, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Front for Victory (FpV)", "winner_candidate": "Cristina Fern\u00e1ndez de Kirchner", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Broad Progressive Front (FAP)", "margin": 37.31, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:246", "name": "Argentina 2011 Generales \u2014 Intendente", "metadata": {"country": "Argentina", "year": 2011, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 32417, "granularity": "booth", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 204, "turnout_100_pct": 15}, "n_stations_flagged": 219, "created_at": "2026-05-06T23:24:43.993913", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.76, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.957, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.749, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.573, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.989, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.768, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.692, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.022, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.755, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.034, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2011, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.573, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.597, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.597, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.641, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.641, "year": 2011, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.544, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.544, "year": 2011, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.886, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.886, "year": 2011, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Front for Victory (FpV)", "winner_candidate": "Cristina Fern\u00e1ndez de Kirchner", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Broad Progressive Front (FAP)", "margin": 37.31, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "ARG", "year": 2011, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:198", "name": "Mexico 2024 Presidente (INE)", "metadata": {"country": "Mexico", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 170766, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1178, "cast_exceeds_registered": 95, "turnout_100_pct": 138}, "n_stations_flagged": 233, "created_at": "2026-05-06T19:50:38.360097", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.004, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.907, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.496, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.246, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.004, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.751, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.907, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 2.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.173, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.543, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.399, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.6, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.957, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.739, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.581, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.395, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.496, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.246, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.246, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.63, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.63, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.394, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.394, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.645, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.645, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:185", "name": "Hong Kong 2025 LegCo LC9", "metadata": {"country": "Hong Kong", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 69, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 69}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T17:24:13.803228", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.242, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.525, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.151, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.142, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.242, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.009, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.116, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.964, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.142, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.142, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.085, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.085, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.227, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.227, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:184", "name": "Hong Kong 2025 LegCo LC8", "metadata": {"country": "Hong Kong", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 64, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 64}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T17:24:00.941241", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.242, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.525, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.151, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.142, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.242, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.009, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.116, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.964, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.142, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.142, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.085, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.085, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.227, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.227, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:183", "name": "Hong Kong 2025 LegCo LC7", "metadata": {"country": "Hong Kong", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 66, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 66}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T17:23:48.559234", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.242, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.525, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.151, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.142, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.242, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.009, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.116, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.964, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.142, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.142, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.085, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.085, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.227, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.227, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:182", "name": "Hong Kong 2025 LegCo LC6", "metadata": {"country": "Hong Kong", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 57, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 57}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T17:23:36.111559", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.242, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.525, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.151, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.142, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.242, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.009, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.116, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.964, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.142, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.142, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.085, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.085, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.227, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.227, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:181", "name": "Hong Kong 2025 LegCo LC5", "metadata": {"country": "Hong Kong", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 57, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 57}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T17:23:23.741488", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.242, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.525, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.151, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.142, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.242, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.009, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.116, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.964, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.142, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.142, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.085, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.085, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.227, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.227, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:180", "name": "Hong Kong 2025 LegCo LC4", "metadata": {"country": "Hong Kong", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 53, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 53}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T17:23:11.030301", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.242, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.525, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.151, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.142, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.242, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.009, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.116, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.964, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.142, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.142, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.085, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.085, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.227, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.227, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:179", "name": "Hong Kong 2025 LegCo LC3", "metadata": {"country": "Hong Kong", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 58, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 58}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T17:22:57.918385", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.242, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.525, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.151, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.142, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.242, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.009, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.116, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.964, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.142, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.142, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.085, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.085, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.227, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.227, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:178", "name": "Hong Kong 2025 LegCo LC2", "metadata": {"country": "Hong Kong", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 66, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 66}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T17:22:45.164125", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.242, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.525, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.151, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.142, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.242, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.009, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.116, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.964, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.142, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.142, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.085, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.085, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.227, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.227, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:177", "name": "Hong Kong 2025 LegCo LC10", "metadata": {"country": "Hong Kong", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 71, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 71}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T17:22:32.111649", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.242, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.525, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.151, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.142, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.242, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.009, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.116, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.964, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.142, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.142, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.085, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.085, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.227, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.227, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:176", "name": "Hong Kong 2025 LegCo LC1", "metadata": {"country": "Hong Kong", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 63, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 63}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T17:22:10.587078", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 0.242, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.525, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.151, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.142, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.242, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.06, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.525, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.631, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.152, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.009, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.464, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.116, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.964, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.741, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.035, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.151, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.151, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.142, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.142, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.219, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.219, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.614, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.614, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.579, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.579, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.085, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.085, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.227, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.227, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:175", "name": "Guyana 2025 Regional (GECOM)", "metadata": {"country": "Guyana", "year": 2025, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2790, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 24, "turnout_100_pct": 15}, "n_stations_flagged": 39, "created_at": "2026-05-06T12:50:24.819082", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.932, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.056, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.515, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.328, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.056, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.134, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.352, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.223, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.515, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.515, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.328, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.38, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.38, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.668, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.771, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:174", "name": "Guyana 2025 General (GECOM)", "metadata": {"country": "Guyana", "year": 2025, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3039, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 20, "turnout_100_pct": 14}, "n_stations_flagged": 34, "created_at": "2026-05-06T12:50:09.910257", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.932, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.056, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.515, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.328, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.733, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.056, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.764, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.134, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.571, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.78, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.352, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.588, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.223, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.515, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.515, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.328, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.38, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.38, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.668, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.668, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.507, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.507, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.771, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.771, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:173", "name": "Somaliland 2024 Presidential (SLNEC)", "metadata": {"country": "Somalia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2405, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2405}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T12:49:50.980422", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": 0.165, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.127, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.153, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.247, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.062, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.165, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.165, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.127, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.127, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.101, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.101, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.424, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.208, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.208, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.619, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:172", "name": "Somaliland 2024 Parties (SLNEC)", "metadata": {"country": "Somalia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "other", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2405, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2405}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T12:49:32.488208", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": null, "quality_index_source": null, "losers_consent_index": null, "losers_consent_source": null, "electoral_democracy_index": 0.165, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.127, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.153, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.288, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.247, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.062, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.165, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.165, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.127, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.127, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.101, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.101, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.424, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.424, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.208, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.208, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.87, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.87, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.619, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.619, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:171", "name": "Liberia 2023 Presidential R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Liberia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5890, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 5890}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T12:48:58.368284", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 5756, "n_distinct_geometry": 16, "quality_index": 3.219, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.785, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.624, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.421, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.219, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.785, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.048, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.762, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.093, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.523, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.726, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.267, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.567, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.31, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.328, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.624, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.624, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.421, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.421, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.407, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.407, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.581, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.581, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.877, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.877, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.836, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:167", "name": "Liberia 2005 Senate R1", "metadata": {"country": "Liberia", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3068, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 82, "cast_exceeds_registered": 2562, "turnout_100_pct": 7}, "n_stations_flagged": 2569, "created_at": "2026-05-06T11:48:10.231457", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3007, "n_distinct_geometry": 16, "quality_index": 2.991, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.942, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.276, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.267, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.991, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.748, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.042, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.51, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.085, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.267, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.267, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.217, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.217, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.649, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "UP", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "CDC", "margin": 18.8, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "LBR", "year": 2005, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:166", "name": "Liberia 2005 Presidential R1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Liberia", "year": 2005, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3068, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 82, "cast_exceeds_registered": 11}, "n_stations_flagged": 11, "created_at": "2026-05-06T11:47:36.796561", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3007, "n_distinct_geometry": 16, "quality_index": 2.991, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.942, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.276, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.267, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.991, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.748, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.042, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.51, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.085, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.267, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.267, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.217, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.217, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.649, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "UP", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "CDC", "margin": 18.8, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "LBR", "year": 2005, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:165", "name": "Liberia 2005 House R1", "metadata": {"country": "Liberia", "year": 2005, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3068, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 82, "cast_exceeds_registered": 6, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 7, "created_at": "2026-05-06T11:46:40.595404", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 3007, "n_distinct_geometry": 16, "quality_index": 2.991, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.942, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.276, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.267, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.991, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.748, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.59, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.897, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.042, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.51, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.085, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.521, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.141, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.535, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.661, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.415, "year": 2005, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.276, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.276, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.267, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.267, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.217, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.217, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.649, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.649, "year": 2005, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.857, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2005, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.83, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2005, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "UP", "winner_candidate": null, "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "CDC", "margin": 18.8, "political_system": "presidential", "iso3code": "LBR", "year": 2005, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:162", "name": "Uganda 2021 Presidential", "metadata": {"country": "Uganda", "year": 2021, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 34684, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 1, "turnout_100_pct": 409}, "n_stations_flagged": 410, "created_at": "2026-05-06T11:43:13.094475", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.207, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.793, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.274, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.18, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.207, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.302, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.793, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.448, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.786, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.447, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.519, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.13, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.007, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.252, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.182, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.295, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.366, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.342, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.274, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.274, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.18, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.18, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.153, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.153, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.413, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.413, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.27, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.27, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.815, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.815, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.495, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.495, "year": 2021, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:161", "name": "Uganda 2016 Presidential", "metadata": {"country": "Uganda", "year": 2016, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 28010, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 1, "turnout_100_pct": 130}, "n_stations_flagged": 131, "created_at": "2026-05-06T11:41:54.049572", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.059, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.76, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.289, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.205, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.059, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.265, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.76, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.509, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.377, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.538, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.135, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.211, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.867, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.217, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.448, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.362, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.289, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.289, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.205, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.205, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.181, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.181, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.468, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.468, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.337, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.337, "year": 2016, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.831, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.831, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.568, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.568, "year": 2016, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:160", "name": "DRC 2023 Presidential", "metadata": {"country": "DR Congo", "year": 2023, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 20109, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 20109}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T11:40:23.001204", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.703, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.087, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.333, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.123, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.703, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.426, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.087, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.272, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.828, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.08, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.27, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.337, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.334, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 1.391, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.348, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.804, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.451, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.333, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.333, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.123, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.123, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.156, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.156, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.458, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.458, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.161, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.161, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.686, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.686, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:159", "name": "DRC 2018 Presidential", "metadata": {"country": "DR Congo", "year": 2018, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 17780, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 369, "turnout_100_pct": 7}, "n_stations_flagged": 376, "created_at": "2026-05-06T11:39:17.892457", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 1.648, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 1.582, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.306, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.117, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 1.648, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.412, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 1.582, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.396, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.79, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.448, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.006, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.252, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.026, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.257, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 0.495, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.124, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.244, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.311, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.306, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.306, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.117, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.117, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.181, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.181, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.398, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.398, "year": 2018, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.223, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.223, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2018, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.656, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.656, "year": 2018, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:158", "name": "Canada 2021 Federal House", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 79068, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6739, "cast_exceeds_registered": 883, "turnout_100_pct": 53}, "n_stations_flagged": 936, "created_at": "2026-05-06T11:36:16.123060", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 79068, "n_distinct_geometry": 68326, "quality_index": 3.846, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.904, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.843, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.749, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.846, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.818, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.634, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.908, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.822, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.706, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.749, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.749, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.711, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.931, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.909, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.909, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.03, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.03, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.936, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.936, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:157", "name": "Canada 2019 Federal House", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 75354, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 6503, "cast_exceeds_registered": 582, "turnout_100_pct": 23}, "n_stations_flagged": 605, "created_at": "2026-05-06T11:31:27.396703", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 75354, "n_distinct_geometry": 79554, "quality_index": 3.875, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.918, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.85, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.763, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.875, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.918, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.666, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.673, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.832, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.85, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.85, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.763, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.763, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.716, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.716, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:156", "name": "Canada 2015 Federal House", "metadata": {"country": "Canada", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier2_official_derived \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier2_official_derived", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 74860, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 5277, "cast_exceeds_registered": 729, "turnout_100_pct": 31}, "n_stations_flagged": 760, "created_at": "2026-05-06T11:29:07.694273", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 74860, "n_distinct_geometry": 60809, "quality_index": 3.763, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.944, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.807, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.735, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.763, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.944, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.421, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.513, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.878, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.718, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.929, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.779, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.695, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.807, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.735, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2015, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.665, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.665, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.938, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.938, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.021, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.021, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:139", "name": "Belarus 2020 PVT (\u0413\u043e\u043b\u043e\u0441/Zubr.in citizen reconstruction)", "metadata": {"country": "Belarus", "year": 2020, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": "1,310 of ~5,800 precincts. Comparison set for forensics \u2014 citizen ~62% Lukashenko vs official 80%.\n", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "critical", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier3_citizen \u00b7 parallel_count", "authority_tier": "tier3_citizen", "publication_status": "parallel_count"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1310, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 6, "turnout_100_pct": 9, "no_report": 36}, "n_stations_flagged": 51, "created_at": "2026-05-06T05:59:51.890061", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 1310, "n_distinct_geometry": 781, "quality_index": 0.277, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 0.975, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.208, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.045, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 0.277, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.069, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 0.975, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.244, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 1.322, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.331, "year": 2020, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 0.228, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.057, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 0.064, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.016, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.332, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.833, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 0.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.071, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.208, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.208, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.045, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.045, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.244, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.244, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.227, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.227, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.018, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.018, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.372, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.372, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.129, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.129, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:126", "name": "Lithuania 2024 Seimas", "metadata": {"country": "Lithuania", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1947, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T04:56:14.831071", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.132, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.902, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.798, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.732, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.132, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.902, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.896, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.32, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.83, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.339, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.807, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.845, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.711, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.798, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.798, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.732, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.732, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.696, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.696, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.918, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.918, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.169, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.169, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:125", "name": "Slovenia 2014 EP", "metadata": {"country": "Slovenia", "year": 2014, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3267, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 317, "cast_exceeds_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-05-06T04:54:21.636919", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.612, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.741, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.865, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.794, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.612, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.741, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.935, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.766, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.219, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.645, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.911, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.281, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.57, "year": 2014, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.794, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.794, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2014, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.937, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.937, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.097, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.097, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 2014, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:124", "name": "Slovenia 2009 EP", "metadata": {"country": "Slovenia", "year": 2009, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3740, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 266, "cast_exceeds_registered": 1, "turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-05-06T04:53:53.891031", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.882, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.937, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.873, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.791, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.882, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.937, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.933, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.65, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.912, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.219, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.694, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.584, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.646, "year": 2009, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.873, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.873, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.791, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.78, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.78, "year": 2009, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.94, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.94, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.865, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.13, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.13, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2009, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:123", "name": "Romania 2024 pcj (AEP)", "metadata": {"country": "Romania", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18955, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 93}, "n_stations_flagged": 93, "created_at": "2026-05-06T04:51:26.097248", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.442, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.344, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.628, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.449, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.442, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.611, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.344, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.586, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.505, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.376, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.628, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.449, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.442, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.389, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.389, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:122", "name": "Romania 2024 eup (AEP)", "metadata": {"country": "Romania", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 19870, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 915, "cast_exceeds_registered": 202, "turnout_100_pct": 21}, "n_stations_flagged": 223, "created_at": "2026-05-06T04:50:05.713191", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.442, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.344, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.628, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.449, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.442, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.611, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.344, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.586, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.505, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.376, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.628, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.449, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.442, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.389, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.389, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:121", "name": "Romania 2024 cj (AEP)", "metadata": {"country": "Romania", "year": 2024, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 18955, "granularity": "station", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 93}, "n_stations_flagged": 93, "created_at": "2026-05-06T04:48:51.960585", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.442, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 2.344, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.628, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.449, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.442, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.611, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 2.344, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.586, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.381, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 1.505, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.376, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 1.878, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.469, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 2.94, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.418, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.605, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.628, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.628, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.449, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.449, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.442, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.442, "year": 2024, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.661, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.661, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.389, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.389, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.736, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.736, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:120", "name": "Poland 2023 Sejm", "metadata": {"country": "Poland", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 31497, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2, "turnout_100_pct": 77}, "n_stations_flagged": 77, "created_at": "2026-05-06T04:47:13.036709", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 2.755, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.863, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.598, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.457, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 2.755, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.689, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.343, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.836, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.609, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.652, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 2.47, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.618, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.518, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.879, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.012, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.503, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.598, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.598, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.457, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.457, "year": 2023, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.52, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.52, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.56, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.56, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.13, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.13, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.659, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.659, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:119", "name": "Lithuania 2020 Seimas", "metadata": {"country": "Lithuania", "year": 2020, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1987, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-05-06T04:46:49.109354", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.253, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.852, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.802, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.745, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.253, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.813, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.371, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.339, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.421, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.838, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.71, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.802, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.802, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2020, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.697, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.697, "year": 2020, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.924, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.116, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.116, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2020, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:118", "name": "Lithuania 2016 Seimas", "metadata": {"country": "Lithuania", "year": 2016, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1996, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 83}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T04:46:27.530335", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.814, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.936, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.825, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.772, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.814, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.954, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.936, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.919, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.439, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.86, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.427, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.42, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.831, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.708, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.825, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.825, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.772, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.772, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.737, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.737, "year": 2016, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.973, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.136, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.136, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.941, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2016, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:117", "name": "Finland tpv_2024_2 (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Finland", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1756, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-05-06T04:45:39.828628", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.863, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.827, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.782, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.549, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.263, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.566, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.703, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:116", "name": "Finland tpv_2024_1 (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Finland", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1756, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-05-06T04:45:18.687282", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.863, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.827, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.782, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.549, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.263, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.566, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.703, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:115", "name": "Finland kv_2025", "metadata": {"country": "Finland", "year": 2025, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1658, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-05-06T04:44:44.817722", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.863, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.852, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.808, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.549, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.263, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.566, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.808, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.808, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.707, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.707, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.031, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.031, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.946, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:114", "name": "Finland kv_2021", "metadata": {"country": "Finland", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1854, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-05-06T04:44:07.329749", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.86, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.93, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.871, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.835, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.924, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.549, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.015, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.504, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.835, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.835, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:113", "name": "Finland epv_2024", "metadata": {"country": "Finland", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1756, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-05-06T04:43:44.871472", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.863, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.827, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.782, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.549, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.263, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.566, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.782, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.782, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.703, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.703, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.95, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:112", "name": "Finland epv_2019", "metadata": {"country": "Finland", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1943, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T04:43:22.531565", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.86, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.93, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.881, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.842, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.924, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.707, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.015, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.504, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.976, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.01, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.01, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.975, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Formally independent, supported by National Coalition Party (NCP) and Christian Democrats (KD)", "winner_candidate": "Sauli Niinist\u00f6", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Green League", "margin": 50.2, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "FIN", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:111", "name": "Finland ekv_2023", "metadata": {"country": "Finland", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1808, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-05-06T04:42:59.903031", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.863, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.927, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.853, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.812, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.927, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.92, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.98, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.774, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.549, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.001, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.5, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.767, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.767, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.981, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.015, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.015, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.961, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.961, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:110", "name": "Finland ekv_2019", "metadata": {"country": "Finland", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1943, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 3}, "n_stations_flagged": 3, "created_at": "2026-05-06T04:42:36.052215", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.86, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.93, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.881, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.842, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.924, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.707, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.015, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.504, "year": 2019, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.881, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.881, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2019, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.976, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.01, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.01, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.975, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.975, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Formally independent, supported by National Coalition Party (NCP) and Christian Democrats (KD)", "winner_candidate": "Sauli Niinist\u00f6", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Green League", "margin": 50.2, "political_system": "parliamentary", "iso3code": "FIN", "year": 2018, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:108", "name": "Finland av_2022", "metadata": {"country": "Finland", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1664, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T04:41:51.281985", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.86, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.93, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.869, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.827, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.86, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.965, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.924, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.852, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.549, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.959, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.99, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.015, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.504, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.869, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.869, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.827, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.827, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.784, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.784, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.011, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.011, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:107", "name": "Estonia rk_2023 (VVK)", "metadata": {"country": "Estonia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 86, "granularity": "parish", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T04:41:34.696398", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.848, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.264, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.845, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.264, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.799, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.833, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.296, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.845, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.845, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.806, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.806, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.966, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.031, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.031, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.969, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:106", "name": "Estonia kov_2025 (VVK)", "metadata": {"country": "Estonia", "year": 2025, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 78, "granularity": "parish", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T04:41:15.791646", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.848, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.264, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.887, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.837, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.264, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.799, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.501, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.875, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.833, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.296, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 2025, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.887, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.887, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.837, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.837, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.81, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.81, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.969, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.025, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.025, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.969, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:105", "name": "Estonia kov_2021 (VVK)", "metadata": {"country": "Estonia", "year": 2021, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 79, "granularity": "parish", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T04:40:54.808496", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.873, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.948, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.9, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.853, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.873, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.948, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.926, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.821, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.833, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.517, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.629, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.9, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.9, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.853, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.853, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.816, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.031, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.031, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.974, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.974, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:104", "name": "Estonia ep_2024 (VVK)", "metadata": {"country": "Estonia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 86, "granularity": "parish", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T04:40:37.896534", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.848, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.264, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.893, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.848, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.848, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.264, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.816, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.915, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.799, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.835, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.959, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.833, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.958, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.296, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.574, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.893, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.893, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.848, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.848, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.805, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.805, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.969, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.025, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.025, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.969, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:84", "name": "Lithuania 2012 Seimas", "metadata": {"country": "Lithuania", "year": 2012, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2017, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T01:24:26.397574", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.723, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.714, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.839, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.783, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.723, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.931, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.714, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.284, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.821, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.484, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.614, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.903, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.68, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.67, "year": 2012, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.839, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.839, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.783, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.783, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2012, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.968, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.147, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.147, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2012, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:83", "name": "Lithuania 2008 Seimas", "metadata": {"country": "Lithuania", "year": 2008, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2034, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T01:24:17.006680", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.847, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.947, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.824, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.765, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.947, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.987, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.932, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.696, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.924, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.484, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.677, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.669, "year": 2008, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.765, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.765, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.745, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.745, "year": 2008, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.945, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.145, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.145, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2008, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "D. Grybauskait\u0117", "runner_up_partisanship": "Left", "runner_up_party": "Social Democratic Party of Lithuania", "margin": 56.53, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "LTU", "year": 2009, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:82", "name": "Lithuania 2004 Seimas", "metadata": {"country": "Lithuania", "year": 2004, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2031, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T01:24:08.037899", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.778, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.931, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.819, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.759, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.931, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.669, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.427, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.484, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.291, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.573, "year": 2004, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.819, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.819, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.74, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.74, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.932, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.932, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.963, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.192, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.192, "year": 2004, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.944, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 2004, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Conservative", "winner_party": "Independent", "winner_candidate": "V. Adamkus", "runner_up_partisanship": "Conservative", "runner_up_party": "Peasants and New Democratic Party Union", "margin": 5.23, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "LTU", "year": 2004, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:81", "name": "Lithuania 2000 Seimas", "metadata": {"country": "Lithuania", "year": 2000, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2027, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T01:23:58.684145", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.764, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.93, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.822, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.759, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.764, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.941, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.93, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.983, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.434, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.859, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.484, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.015, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.504, "year": 2000, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.822, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.822, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.759, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.759, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.727, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.727, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.926, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.926, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.964, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.964, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.192, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.192, "year": 2000, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.927, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.927, "year": 2000, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:80", "name": "Lithuania 1996 Seimas", "metadata": {"country": "Lithuania", "year": 1996, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2036, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T01:23:48.408346", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.771, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.829, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.824, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.753, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.771, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.829, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.904, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.976, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.778, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.945, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.484, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.759, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.44, "year": 1996, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.824, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.824, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.753, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.753, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.713, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.713, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.919, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.919, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.942, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.942, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.192, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.192, "year": 1996, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.923, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.923, "year": 1996, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:79", "name": "Lithuania 1992 Seimas", "metadata": {"country": "Lithuania", "year": 1992, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "researcher_cso", "source_description": "tier4_independent_rekeyed \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier4_independent_rekeyed", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 2061, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T01:23:38.705473", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.777, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.783, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.799, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.731, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.777, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.944, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.783, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.665, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.916, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.429, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.857, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.484, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.711, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.928, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.623, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.406, "year": 1992, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.799, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.799, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.731, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.731, "year": 1992, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.691, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.691, "year": 1992, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.917, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.917, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.925, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.925, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.142, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.142, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 1992, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": {"winner_partisanship": "Left", "winner_party": "Democratic Labour Party of Lithuania", "winner_candidate": "A, Brazauskas", "runner_up_partisanship": null, "runner_up_party": "Independent", "margin": 21.75, "political_system": "semi-presidential", "iso3code": "LTU", "year": 1993, "source": "Girardi (2020), \u201cPartisan Shocks and Financial Markets\u201d, AEJ:Applied 12(4) \u2014 Partisanship in Worldwide Presidential Elections (doi:10.7910/DVN/FHCCWY)"}, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:78", "name": "Norway 2025 st (Valgdirektoratet)", "metadata": {"country": "Norway", "year": 2025, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 3602, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1677, "cast_exceeds_registered": 35, "turnout_100_pct": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T01:23:22.225787", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.798, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.891, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.89, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.847, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.798, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.95, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.891, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.923, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.863, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.966, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.815, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.454, "year": 2025, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.847, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.847, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.844, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.844, "year": 2025, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.01, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.01, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.953, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.953, "year": 2025, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:77", "name": "Norway 2023 ko (Valgdirektoratet)", "metadata": {"country": "Norway", "year": 2023, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1459, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 176}, "n_stations_flagged": 176, "created_at": "2026-05-06T01:23:11.757616", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.826, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.908, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.89, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.841, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.826, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.925, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.007, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.502, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.01, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.01, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:76", "name": "Norway 2023 fy (Valgdirektoratet)", "metadata": {"country": "Norway", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1357, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 174}, "n_stations_flagged": 174, "created_at": "2026-05-06T01:23:03.693351", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.826, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.908, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.89, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.841, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.826, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.925, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.007, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.502, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.89, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.89, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.841, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.841, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.947, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.947, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.955, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.955, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.01, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.01, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.949, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.949, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:75", "name": "Norway 2021 st (Valgdirektoratet)", "metadata": {"country": "Norway", "year": 2021, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1483, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 172}, "n_stations_flagged": 172, "created_at": "2026-05-06T01:22:55.653423", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.826, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.908, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.892, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.843, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.826, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.957, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.908, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.925, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.877, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.969, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.007, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.502, "year": 2021, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.892, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.892, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.843, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.843, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.846, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.846, "year": 2021, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.93, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.93, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.01, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.01, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.951, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.951, "year": 2021, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:74", "name": "Norway 2019 ko (Valgdirektoratet)", "metadata": {"country": "Norway", "year": 2019, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1507, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 168}, "n_stations_flagged": 168, "created_at": "2026-05-06T01:22:45.091209", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.823, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.909, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.889, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.852, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.823, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.872, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.985, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.008, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.008, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:73", "name": "Norway 2019 fy (Valgdirektoratet)", "metadata": {"country": "Norway", "year": 2019, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1403, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"cast_exceeds_registered": 168}, "n_stations_flagged": 168, "created_at": "2026-05-06T01:22:36.798295", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.823, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.909, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.889, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.852, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.823, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.872, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.985, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2019, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.889, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.889, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.852, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.852, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.851, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.851, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.008, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.008, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.96, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.96, "year": 2019, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:72", "name": "Norway 2017 st (Valgdirektoratet)", "metadata": {"country": "Norway", "year": 2017, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1365, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1, "cast_exceeds_registered": 168}, "n_stations_flagged": 168, "created_at": "2026-05-06T01:22:28.017211", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.823, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.909, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.888, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.855, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.823, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.909, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.977, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.928, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.982, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.872, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 1.985, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.496, "year": 2017, "bucket": "low", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.888, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.888, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.855, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.855, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.842, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.842, "year": 2017, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.967, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.967, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.009, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.009, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.978, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.978, "year": 2017, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:71", "name": "Norway 2015 ko (Valgdirektoratet)", "metadata": {"country": "Norway", "year": 2015, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1447, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 2, "cast_exceeds_registered": 162}, "n_stations_flagged": 162, "created_at": "2026-05-06T01:22:17.675703", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.904, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.871, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.052, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.513, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.971, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.006, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.006, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.979, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:70", "name": "Norway 2015 fy (Valgdirektoratet)", "metadata": {"country": "Norway", "year": 2015, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 1342, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 1, "cast_exceeds_registered": 160}, "n_stations_flagged": 160, "created_at": "2026-05-06T01:22:08.727279", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.851, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.922, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.904, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.871, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.851, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.963, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.922, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.981, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.942, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.986, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.847, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.962, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.809, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.914, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.052, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.513, "year": 2015, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.904, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.904, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.871, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.871, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.971, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.971, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.984, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.984, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.006, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.006, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.979, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.979, "year": 2015, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:60", "name": "Slovakia prez_2024_r2 (volby.statistics.sk) (round 2)", "metadata": {"country": "Slovakia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 2, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5938, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-05-06T01:15:17.121945", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.784, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.746, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.59, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.681, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.606, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.706, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.746, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.582, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.278, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.278, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.807, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:59", "name": "Slovakia prez_2024_r1 (volby.statistics.sk) (round 1)", "metadata": {"country": "Slovakia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "presidential", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": 1, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5938, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-05-06T01:15:00.786119", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.784, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.746, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.59, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.681, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.606, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.706, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.746, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.582, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.278, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.278, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.807, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:58", "name": "Slovakia nrsr_2023 (volby.statistics.sk)", "metadata": {"country": "Slovakia", "year": 2023, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 6013, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 18, "turnout_100_pct": 2}, "n_stations_flagged": 2, "created_at": "2026-05-06T01:14:38.380910", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.784, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.812, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.724, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 2.941, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.735, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.606, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.327, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.812, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.812, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.724, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.724, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.653, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.653, "year": 2023, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.915, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.915, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.896, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.896, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.196, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.196, "year": 2023, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.933, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.933, "year": 2023, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:57", "name": "Slovakia ep_2024 (volby.statistics.sk)", "metadata": {"country": "Slovakia", "year": 2024, "election_type": "parliamentary", "contest_name": null, "notes": null, "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 5930, "granularity": "district", "quality_summary": {"turnout_100_pct": 1}, "n_stations_flagged": 1, "created_at": "2026-05-06T01:14:16.104119", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": true, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.784, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.892, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.746, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.59, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.784, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.946, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.892, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.973, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.871, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.968, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.681, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.92, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.824, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.956, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.606, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.901, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.706, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.676, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.746, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.746, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.59, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.59, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.582, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.582, "year": 2024, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.861, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.861, "year": 2024, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.838, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.838, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.278, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.278, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.807, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.807, "year": 2024, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}, {"id": "v2:51", "name": "Iceland 2022 Sveitarstj\u00f3rnarkosningar", "metadata": {"country": "Iceland", "year": 2022, "election_type": "local", "contest_name": null, "notes": "49 sveitarf\u00e9l\u00f6g, ~146 (municipality \u00d7 list) combos.", "electoral_system": null, "round": null, "stakes_level": "routine", "special_flags": [], "source_category": "official", "source_description": "tier1_official_direct \u00b7 final", "authority_tier": "tier1_official_direct", "publication_status": "final"}, "mapping": {"station_id_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "registered_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "cast_col": null, "valid_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "invalid_col": null, "region_col": "region", "sub_region_col": "sub_region", "lat_col": null, "lon_col": null, "candidate_cols": {}, "long_format": true, "long_candidate_name_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_candidate_votes_col": "(v2 \u2014 column metadata not surfaced)", "long_race_split_col": null, "geometry_source": null, "station_type_col": null, "station_type_map": {}, "ballots_received_col": null, "ballots_spoiled_col": null, "ballots_unused_col": null, "ballots_issued_col": null, "ballots_in_box_col": null, "discrepancy_col": null, "votes_in_box_col": null, "result_status_col": null, "result_status_map": {}, "emb_flag_cols": [], "emb_flag_map": {}, "audit_history_source": null}, "n_stations": 49, "granularity": "municipality", "quality_summary": {"registered_unavailable": 49}, "n_stations_flagged": 0, "created_at": "2026-05-06T01:10:40.633439", "office_group": null, "province_subset": null, "n_non_regular": 0, "has_real_registered": false, "n_with_geometry": 0, "n_distinct_geometry": 0, "quality_index": 3.459, "quality_index_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Free and Fair Elections Index (v2elfrfair_osp)", "losers_consent_index": 3.469, "losers_consent_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Election losers consent (v2elaccept_osp)", "electoral_democracy_index": 0.832, "electoral_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Electoral Democracy Index (v2x_polyarchy)", "liberal_democracy_index": 0.742, "liberal_democracy_source": "V-Dem (v16) \u2014 Liberal Democracy Index (v2x_libdem)", "vdem_indicators": {"free_fair": {"label": "Free and Fair Elections Index", "score": 3.459, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.865, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elfrfair_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4 ordinal (v2elfrfair_osp) estimate of the extent to which registration fraud, systematic irregularities, government intimidation of the opposition, vote buying, and election violence are absent, and the EMB is autonomous and resourced.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "losers_consent": {"label": "Election losers consent", "score": 3.469, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.867, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elaccept_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which losing parties / candidates accept the official results. Independent of cleanness \u2014 a clean election can still see losers refuse the verdict.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_intimidation": {"label": "Election government intimidation", "score": 3.887, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.972, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elintim_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: extent to which opposition candidates / parties / workers are subjected to repression, intimidation, violence, or harassment by the government. Higher = LESS intimidation.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_irregularities": {"label": "Election other voting irregularities", "score": 3.164, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.791, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elirreg_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: other intentional irregularities (ballot stuffing, double voting, intentional miscounting). Higher = LESS irregular.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_autonomy": {"label": "Election management body autonomy", "score": 3.688, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembaut_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have autonomy from the government to apply election rules and laws impartially? Higher = MORE autonomous.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_emb_capacity": {"label": "Election management body capacity", "score": 3.575, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.894, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elembcap_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: does the EMB have sufficient staff and resources to administer a well-run election? Higher = MORE capable.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "election_paid_campaign": {"label": "Election paid campaign advertising", "score": 2.416, "scale_max": 4.0, "score_normalised": 0.604, "year": 2022, "bucket": "moderate", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2elpaidig_osp)", "interpretation": "0..4: how equal was access to paid campaign advertising across parties / candidates? Higher = MORE equal access.", "axis": "election", "inverted": false}, "electoral_democracy": {"label": "Electoral Democracy Index", "score": 0.832, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.832, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_polyarchy)", "interpretation": "0..1 polyarchy index (Robert Dahl). The rule-set the election operates inside: free-fair elections + freedoms of association + expression + elected executive. Slow-moving regime context.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "liberal_democracy": {"label": "Liberal Democracy Index", "score": 0.742, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.742, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_libdem)", "interpretation": "0..1 multiplicative combination of polyarchy with constraints on the executive, minority rights, and judicial independence. A high Free+Fair under a low Liberal-dem is the textbook signature of competitive authoritarianism.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "egalitarian_democracy": {"label": "Egalitarian Democracy Index", "score": 0.752, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.752, "year": 2022, "bucket": "high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_egaldem)", "interpretation": "0..1: polyarchy \u00d7 extent to which political rights and freedoms are protected EQUALLY across social groups.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "civil_liberties": {"label": "Civil liberties index", "score": 0.952, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.952, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_civlib)", "interpretation": "0..1: liberal rights \u2014 physical violence, privacy, political rights, equality before the law. Lower \u2192 state restricts or attacks civil liberties.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "judicial_constraints": {"label": "Judicial constraints on the executive", "score": 0.943, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.943, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_jucon)", "interpretation": "0..1: does the judiciary effectively constrain executive action (review, override, prosecute)? Lower \u2192 unconstrained executive.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}, "political_corruption": {"label": "Political corruption index", "score": 0.023, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.023, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_corr)", "interpretation": "0..1 composite of public-sector + executive + judicial + legislative corruption. INVERTED \u2014 higher = MORE corrupt.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": true}, "freedom_of_expression": {"label": "Freedom of expression and alternative information", "score": 0.922, "scale_max": 1.0, "score_normalised": 0.922, "year": 2022, "bucket": "very high", "source": "V-Dem (v16, 2026) \u2014 extracted from V-Dem-CY-Full+Others-v16.csv (v2x_freexp_altinf)", "interpretation": "0..1: extent to which government respects press / media freedom, freedom of ordinary people to discuss politics, and freedom of academic / cultural expression.", "axis": "regime", "inverted": false}}, "partisanship": null, "status_summary": {}, "flag_dictionary": {}, "composite_anomaly_score": null, "fingerprint_category": null, "anomaly_pattern": null, "has_audit_overlay": false}]